United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-97-025c
Environmental Protection Emergency Response NTIS: PB97-178 903
Agency (5305W) February 1998
v>EPA Background Document
for Capacity Analysis
for Land Disposal
Restrictions Phase III -
Decharacterized Waste
waters, Carbamate
Wastes, and Spent
Potliners (Final Rule)
Volume 3:
Appendix A (Part 2) -
Appendix F
Printed on paper that contains at lest 20 percent postconsumer fiber
-------
APPENDIX A (Part 2)
DETAILED ANALYSES OF THE REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR
INDUSTRIES GENERATING IGNITABLE, CORROSIVE, REACTIVE, AND/OR
ORGANIC TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTES MANAGED IN CLEAN WATER
ACT OR CLEAN WATER ACT-EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter No.
Leather Treating , 11
Metal Products and Machinery . . . . '....-. 12
Pesticides 13
Petroleum Refining 14
Pharmaceutical 15
Pulp and Paper 16
Transportation Equipment Cleaning . . . . .17
-------
CHAPTER 11
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR THE
LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING INDUSTRY
11.1 INTRODUCTION
This analysis of required treatment capacity for the leather tanning and finishing industry
was developed to support today's proposed rule. The following sections are presented: summary
of findings (Section 11.2); background on the leather tanning and finishing industry (Section 11.3);
waste types potentially subject to today's proposed rule (Section 11.4); available data on wastes
generated and managed at the leather tanning and finishing facilities (Section 11.5); and an
analysis of required treatment capacity for the leather tanning and finishing industry (Section
11.6).
11.2 SUMMARY •
The leather tanning and finishing industry is primarily engaged in tanning, currying, and
finishing raw or cured hides and skins into leather. A summary of the estimated impact of today's
proposed rule is presented in Exhibit 11-1.
EXHIBIT 11-1
MAJOR FINDINGS FOR THE LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING INDUSTRY
Discharge
Mode
Direct
Indirect"
Zero
Total
Number of
Facilities
17
— T41~
2
160
Total \Vastewaters~~
Mixed With ICRT
Wastes (million
tons/yr)"
4.9
46.5
0.6
52
- -1 Facilities
without RCRA-
equivalent
Treatment*
17
141
2
160
„ _ . ,
Facilities
with Land-
based Units8
17
6
2
25
- _
Affected
Facilities8
3 to 17
0 to 6
Oto2
3 to 25
Affected
Wastewater
(million
tons/yr)a
0.8 to 4.9
0 to 2.0
0 to 0.6
0.8 to 7.5
• The quantities in this column were determined on an aggregated basis and apportioned to the direct, indirect, and zero
dischargers based on the percentage of each discharge mode. • •" . ' .
The exact number of facilities in this industry is unclear. According to the effluent
limitations guidelines development document1 and the POTW Report to Congress2, as of
1 U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
Standards for the Leather Tanning and Finishing, Point Source Category, Office of Water, Document No.
440/1-82/016.
2 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), Report to Congress on the Discharge of Hazardous Wastes to Publicly
Owned Treatment Works, Office of Water, Regulations and Standards.
-------
11-2
November 1982, there were approximately 160 facilities in the leather tanning and finishing
industry. According to another data source, in 1987, there were 311 facilities in the leather
tanning and finishing industry.3 However, according to an industry expert, the number of leather
tanning and finishing establishments is now estimated to be less than 100.4 In this analysis, EPA
used the effluent guidelines development document and POTW report estimates of 160 facilities.
Most tanneries operate on a small-scale basis, are located in urban areas, and use tanks
for wastewater treatment. Today's proposed rule may impact only a few of these facilities since
most of the characteristic wastewaters managed in land-based units also carry listed codes,
especially the solvent codes, as is indicated by the 1991 Biennial Reporting System (BRS) and the
POTW Report to Congress.5 EPA estimates that 90 percent of the hazardous wastes generated
by the leather tanning industry contain spent solvents and carry the listed codes. All of the
remaining raw wastewaters that are managed in land-based units may be affected by the today's
rule. Other assumptions used in this analysis are detailed in Section 11.6.
' • ' t .
Using the data and assumptions outlined above, EPA developed estimates for affected
facilities and wastes. Most of the available data are several years old with some of the data being
more than 20 years old. This rule may, in reality, have a very low impact on the leather tanning
and finishing industry. _ Several practices may have changed in light of the RCRA program. For
example, facilities may be segregating their wastewaters and treating them separately in tanks.
113 BACKGROUND6
The leather tanning and finishing industry is addressed in 40 CFR Part 425 and has an
SIC code of 3111. Establishments in this industry are primarily engaged in tanning, currying, and
finishing raw or cured hides and skins into leather. In addition, the industry includes converters
and dealers thaH>ny-hide*-and-sfcins or leather and contract with tanners or finishers to process
these products. In 1987, there were 258 tanneries, 16 converters, and 45 contract tanneries in the'
leather tanning and finishing industry.7 However, according to an industry expert, the number of
leather tanning and finishing establishments is now less than 100, of which around 30
establishments conduct only finishing operations.8 : - — - '
The tanneries operating in the United States as of September 1982 were primarily located
in Massachusetts, New York, and Wisconsin.9 The vast majority of these facilities are family-
3 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1990 (January), 1987 Census of Manufacturers, Industry Series,
MC87-1-31A.
4 Personal communication with Frank Rutland, Director of the Leather Association, University of
Cincinnati, 1994 (September 20).
5 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), op. cit
6 Most of this section is summarized from U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. cit.
7 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1990 (January), op. cit.
8 Personal communication with Frank Rutland (September 20), op. cit.
9 U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op.-cit.
-------
11-3
owned and closely-held corporations, with a few facilities that are divisions of large conglomerates.
Approximately 30 percent of these facilities have less than 50 employees and generate less than
100,000 gallons of wastewater per day. Most of the facilities are housed in buildings that are
more than 50 years old. A few of these facilities, typically the larger facilities, use modern
processing methods and equipment.
The primary raw materials for tanning are cattle hides, sheepskins, and pigskins. The
hides and skins of horses, goats, deer, elk, calves, and other animals are also used in smaller
quantities. These animal hides or skins are composed of outer (epidermal) and inner (dermal)
layers. The dermal layer, consisting mainly of the protein collagen, is made into leather. Tanning
is the reaction of collagen fibers with tannins, chromium, alum, or other tanning agents that
stabilize and preserve the hide or skin.
A schematic of the standard manufacturing processes characteristic to the leather tanning
and finishing industry is shown in Exhibit 11-2. Virtually all the manufacturing processes utilize
water in significant quantities. In addition, some processes use various chemical preservatives,
biocides, dyes, pigments, and solvents.
The standard manufacturing processes for the leather tanning and finishing industry can be
organized into three major groups:
• Beamhouse operations - including washing and soaking hides or skins and
removing the attached hair;
• Tanvard process - involving the tanning agent's reaction with and stabilization of
the proteinaceous matter in the hides or skins; and
• Retanning and wet finishing - involving further tanning performed with chemical
agents such as syntans, dyes, lubricants, and various finishes.
The primary inputs to these operations include water, lime, sodium sulfide, sodium
sulfhydrate, ammonium salts, enzymes, basic chromium sulfates, vegetable tanning extracts,
synthetic tanning compounds, mineral acids, alum, natural and synthetic fatliquors, acid dyes, some
solvent coatings, and sodium chloride.
The leather tanning and finishing industry has been grouped into nine categories based on
the type of raw material processed and the manufacturing processes employed. The types of
raw materials used for the categorization are cattle hide, grain sides, split, pickled sheepskin,
shearling, and pigskin. The manufacturing processes used for the categorization are beamhouse
operations, tanyard process, and retanning and finishing processes. In most cases, the categories
developed have been substantiated by EPA through the examination of the final products, plant
size, age and location (including climate), wastewater characteristics and treatability, engineering
aspects of various control technologies, costs, economic impacts, and other factors. The specific
categories are listed in Exhibit 1.1-3 along with a summary of the raw materials processed.
Essentially each category is a combination of the processes detailed in the next section. Category
1 represents the largest fraction of the leather tanning and finishing industry and hence, the
available data concentrates on this category.
10
U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op tit
\
-*-
-------
11-4
EXHIBIT 11-2
PRODUCT AND WASTEWATER FLOW FOR
LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING PLANTS
ADDED MATERIALS I
PROCESSES
WASTE
I SOLID AND LIQUID
BEAMHOUSE
OI*T. SALT. ILOOO,
OCPILATOUT CHEMICALS
WITCH ~"~" """""" .
».'. _i _LvtD N
CMCMICALS
——UNFUCB CHCUICALS-
(continued on next page)
-------
11-5
EXHIBIT 11-2
PRODUCT AND WASTEWATER FLOW FOR GENERALIZED
LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING PLANTS
TMMMN6 MZMT
•cm. •LCIOHHC
RETAN. COLOR
MTUOUOKS, MTVI
FATLIOUOR
FINISH
COATIHO
TIUJtMtMT
. Source: U^. EPA, 1982 (November), op, at
-------
11-6
11.4 WASTE TYPES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY TODAY'S RULE
Waste stream constituents include dirt, manure, salt, fleshings, grease, hair, unfixed
chemicals and tanning agents, proteins, dyes, pigments, oil, and leather dust. Specific wastes are
discussed below according to the three major groups of processing: beamhouse operations, lanyard
process, and retanning and wet finishing processes.
Beamhouse operations may generate up to 75 percent of the waste load from a complete
tannery. This group of processes is a source of proteinaceous organic and inorganic (lime)
pollutants characterized by high pH (10 to 12) and substantial amounts of biological oxygen
demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), sulQdes, and. nitrogen.
• Washing and soaking is done to remove salt, restore the .moisture content of the
hides, and remove material such as dirt and manure. This process generates
wastewater that contains dirt, manure, salt (chlorides and other dissolved solids)
and other foreign material.
• Solvent degreasing (usually only for sheepskins and pigskins) generates animal fat
and related waste material from the skins, plus spent detergents or solvents. Most
plants use a solvent recovery system.
• The hair save process mechanically removes hair that has been chemically softened
in an alkaline medium. The bulk of the hair is.removed as a solid, though the
residual roots and fragments may enter the wastewater. Hair may be washed and
baled, however, due to the lack of salability the hair is generally landfilled.
• The hair pulp (burn') process dissolves the hair completely from the hide or skin
using lime and sulfides/sulfhydrates. This generates higher wastewater flows and
pollutant loadings as compared to the hair save process. However, the industry
prefers this process to the hair save process due to cost savings from reduced time
and labor.
The tanyafd process can generate a different volume and pollutant loading of the
wastewater depending on the tanning agent used. The different tanning agents used in the
United States include trivalent chromium, vegetable tannins, alum, and synthetic tannins (syntans).
More than 80 percent of the leather produced is tanned using chromium, while most of the
remaining leather produced.is tanned using vegetable tannins..
• Deliming and bating are performed in an acid medium and produce inorganic
calcium salts, small amounts of proteinaceous hair and waste hide substances, and
large quantities of ammonia.
• Pickling involves soaking in a solution of sulfuric acid and salt for preparing the
hides for tanning. This process generates a highly acidic waste stream (pH of 2.5
to 3.5) that contains salt.
• Tanning is accomplished primarily by trivalent chromium salts, or by vegetable
tannins in extracts derived from special types of tree bark. For chromium tanning,
-------
11-7
some setting agents may be used to increase the chromium uptake in the hide
substance.
The retanning and wet finishing processes also can generate a variety of wastewaters.
• Retanning. coloring, and fatliquoring generate trivalent chromium, vegetable
tannins, synthetic tannins, natural and synthetic sulfonated oils, and spent acid
dyes. These three processes are generally done sequentially, usually in the same
drum. Retanning is generally done using chromium, syntans, and vegetables and
coloring is done using aniline and synthetic organic dyes. Fatliquoring involves
natural oil replenishments for lubrication primarily by synthetic sulfonated oils.
These wastes are fairly low in BOD5 and TSS and are high in chemical oxygen
demand (COD). These wastes are generated in fairly large volumes and may
sometimes be highly colored. The high color prevents these wastewaters from
being recycled.
• Drying may include processes such as hanging, toggling, pasting, and vacuum
drying. This process generates relatively small quantities of low strength
wastewater such as frame washing, rewet conditioning wastes, vacuum dryer
cooling water, wet scrubbers for buffing dust, and spray booth wash down.
• Buffing a'nd"6thef finishing'operations are basically dry processes and generate
little or no wastewater. Water use is generally limited to facilitating handling and
cleanup operations.
Leather tanning arid finishing wastes are characterized by the nine categories developed
using the type of raw materials processed and the manufacturing processed used instead of being
characterized only by the type of process. This was done since most tanneries combine wastes
from the different processes prior to treatment and were taken into consideration for developing
the nine categories presented'in Exhibit 11-3. Hence, wastewaters from the same category
generally have similar characteristics and pollutant loadings. These raw wastewaters are treated
and discharged to surface wasters or POTWs. Approximately 10 percent of the facilities discharge
directly to surface waters (under NPDES) and the remaining send their wastes to POTWs.
Wastewater treatment involves preliminary treatment and end-of-pipe treatment
Preliminary treatment includes screening, sulfide reduction (oxidation or chemical precipitation),
flue gas carbonation, and ammonia reduction. These processes are generally conducted in tanks
and hence may not trigger LDRs. However, the flue gas carbonation involves sparging
(dispersion) followed by clarification, which may be conducted in surface impoundments.
End-of-pipe treatment involves primary and secondary (biological) treatment processes.
The primary treatment processes include flow equalization (in tanks or basins), plain
sedimentation, and coagulation-sedimentation. The biological treatment processes include
trickling filters, treatment in lagoons, activated sludge treatment, and rotating biological
contactors. The end-of-pipe treatment processes are generally conducted only by the direct
dischargers.
These treatment processes are used to control four conventional pollutants — biological
oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), oil and grease, and pH — and one toxic
pollutant — chromium. Most tanneries are several decades old and probably have not significantly
-------
11-8
EXHIBIT 11-3
RAW MATERIAL SUMMARY FOR EACH CATEGORY OF THE
LEATHER AND TANNING INDUSTRY"
Category
1. Hair Pulp; Chrome Tan;
Retan; Wet Finish
2. Hair Save; Chrome Tan;
Retan; Wet Finish
3. Hair Save or Pulp; Norn.
chrome Tan; Retan; Wet
Finish
— -
4. Retan; Wet 'Finish; Sides
a-
5. No Beamhouse " "
6. Through-the-blue
7. Shearling
8. Pigskin
9. Retan; Wet Finish; Splits
Raw Material
Cattle hide
Deer, Elk, Moose
Cattle hide
Calfskin
Cattle hide
Calfskin
Cattle hide
Pigskin
Cattle hide
Sheepskin
Lamb, Goat, Kid, Skiver
Cattle hide
Shearling
Pigskin
Cattle hide
Preprocessed Condition
Fresh
Salted
Brine cured
Brine cured-prefleshed
Prefleshed
Pickled
Fresh
Salted
Dried
Fresh
Salted
Brine cured
Brine cured-prefleshed
Salted
Salted
Brine cured
Brine cured-prefleshed
Prefleshed
Salted
Through-the-blue
Through-the-blue
Pickled
Limed split
Pickled
Brine cured-prefleshed
Pickled
Fresh
Prefleshed
Salted
Brine cured-prefleshed
Fresh
Wet salted
Salt dried
Brine cured
Blue splits
4 U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. cit.
-------
11-9
changed their-treatment processes. At the time the CWA regulations were promulgated (the
development document detailing the regulations is dated November 1982), the other toxic
pollutants measured in the wastewaters were not addressed due to the following reasons: (1) toxic
pollutants were not detectable with the use of analytical methods approved pursuant to section
304(h) of the CWA, (2) toxic pollutants were detected at only a small number of sources within a
category and were uniquely related to the source, (3) toxic pollutants were detected in treated
effluents in trace amounts and were expected to neither cause nor be likely to cause toxic effects,
(4) toxic pollutants in treated effluents were present in amounts too small to be effectively
reduced by technologies known to EPA, or (5) toxic pollutants had no available pretreatment
technologies that were economically available for removing the pollutants prior to discharge to
POTWs.
It appears that some wastes may be D002. Organic TC wastes may be generated. The
following sections address these wastes in more detail, including the degree to which they may
ultimately be affected by today's rule.
11.5 AVAILABLE DATA
Several data sources were used for obtaining information on the generation and
management of the wastes by the leather tanning and finishing industry. A description of the data
sources is given in Chapter 3 of the main text of the background document. The applicable
information obtained from these data sources is provided in the sections below.
11.5.1 Effluent Guidelines Development Document
The development document for the leather industry11 covered the 158 tanneries that
were operating at the time of the compilation of the document This document characterized the
wastewaters primarily for the pollutants regulated by the CWA. The document, however, also
presented waste characterization data on other toxic pollutants that were measured in the
wastewaters. The sampling data summarized in the document were very sparse, with only one
tannery sampled per constituent and category in most cases. The maximum detected toxic'
pollutant concentrations in the raw wastewaters generated by the manufacturing processes in each
category are presented in Exhibit 11*4. As seen in this exhibit, several of the toxic pollutants
detected in the raw wastewaters are at levels above UTS. Also, the raw wastewaters contain
several TC organics. The average volumes of raw wastewaters generated by all facilities in each
category are given in Exhibit 11-5.
With only a few exceptions, the raw wastewaters are treated prior to discharge. Less than
seven percent of the facilities send their wastewaters directly to POTWs without any treatment.
Wastewater treatment involves preliminary treatment and end-of-pipe treatment Preliminary
treatment generally includes screening, sulfide reduction (oxidation or chemical precipitation), flue
gas carbonation, and ammonia reduction. These processes are generally conducted in tanks and
hence may not trigger the LDRs. The maximum detected toxic pollutant concentrations in
wastewaters under Category 1 (the largest category) after sulfide oxidation are presented in
Exhibit 11-6. These were the only data available in the development document for wastewaters
during preliminary treatment
11
U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. cit.
-------
11-10
EXHIBIT 11-4
TOXIC POLLUTANTS DETECTED IN RAW WASTEWATERS"
Chemical Constituent
Lead
Cadmium
Chromium
Mercury
Copper
Nickel
Zinc
Acenaphthene
Benzidine
Benzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
UTS
(mg/1)
0.690
0.690
2.770
0.150
-^
3.980
2.610
0.059
—
0.140
0.055
.0.054
0.046
0.210
0.057
0.089
0.036
0.088
0.090
0.054
Maximum Concentrations (mg/I) in the Nine Industry Categories
1
1.10*
160.00*
0.05
0.06
0.50
0.03
0.03
1
0.26*
0.05
0.03
2
15.60*
150.00*
0.08
0.08
3.64* :
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.14*
^
0.03
Vl
0.40
115.00*
0.20
0.35
0.83
.
0.02
0.27*
0.30
0.04
:
; 4
1.90*
:71.00*
0.70
0.13
0.48
0.03
0.03
1
1
0,02
0.02
5
1.60*
170.00*
0.26
0.03
2.60
0.10
0.02
0.04*
0.01
6
0.04
396.00*
0:15
0.23
0.92
0.01
0.20*
0.03
0.05
7
0.08
. 56.00*
0.03
0.14
0.12
0.50
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
8
0.11
112.00*
0.20
0.04
0.21
0.13*
0.01
0.24*
9
0.59
0.02
120.00*
0.36
0.03
4.00*
0.09
0.03
-------
11-11
EXHIBIT 11-4
TOXIC POLLUTANTS DETECTEJD IN RAW WASTEWATERS (continued)
t
Chemical Constituent
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene . !
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine i
Phenol
2-Nitrophenol j
. 4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Para-chloro-meta Cresol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate i
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Pyrene
Anthracene/Phenanthrene
Acenaphthylene
UTS
(ing/1)
0.057
6.059
6.068
0.400
0.039
0.028
0.120
0.036
0.044
0.089
0.035;
0.280
0.04?:
0.057:
0.067
0.059
0.059
'. '
; Maximum Concentrations (mg/1) in the Nine Industry Categories
I
0.09*
O.GJ2
0.43*
4.40* ,;
'• i
i
i
.
•
;
o4*
,' 0.05
! 0.12*
!
0.02
2 l
3.08* i-
0.03 |
i i •
i i
6.01 !
5.50*:
i
; i
0.01
i :
i
i
i
i •
0.24
0.01
3
0.04
0.06*
• . -, •
i I
! j
'< 25.00*
23.04*
0.07*
2.90*
1.70*
0.01
0.01
0.01
4
0.35*
3;23*
i '
i
5.46* i
2J70*
0.15*
0.40*
0.01
0.18
5
0.10*
0.01
- 6.20*
3.70*
4.20*
0.13*
6
0.03
0.20*
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.78*
7
0.04
0.01
0.09*
1.25*
0.09
0.04
8
0.08*
0.45*
1.42*
0.01
0.20*
0.02
0.02
9
0.10*
0.18*
0.25
0.11*
0.04*
0.15*
0.11
0.11*
-------
1.1-12
EXHIBIT 11-4
TOXIC POLLUTANTS DETECTED IN RAW WASTEWATERS (continued)
Chemical Constituent
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
UTS
(mg/1)
0.056
0.080
0.054
Maximum Concentrations (mg/1) in the Nine Industry Categories
1
0.10*
0.10*
0.02
2
0.31*
3
0.08*
0.02
4
0.24*
0.63* i
0.02
5
0.04
0.10*
6
7
0.01
0.04
8
0.01
9
0.02
• U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. cit.
Concentration exceeds UTS.
-------
11-13
EXHIBIT 11-5
AVERAGE RAW WASTEWATER VOLUMES GENERATED BY ALL
FACILITIES IN EACH CATEGORY8
Category
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Category
Hair Pulp; Chrome Tan; Retan;
Wet Finish
Hair Save; Chrome Tan; Retan;
Wet Finish
Hair Save or Pulp; Non-chrome
Tan; Retan; Wet Finish
Retan; Wet Finish; Sides
No Beamhouse
Through-the-blue
Shearling
Pigskin
Retan; Wet Finish; Splits
Total
Total Raw Wastewaters*
(million gallons per year)
8,700.
420
942
850
318
360
420
70
455
12,535
a Source: U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. ciL
' Estimate based on 250 working days in a year.
The report indicated that there are 17 direct dischargers and 141 indirect dischargers.
Most tanneries only conduct preliminary treatment of their wastewaters and then discharge their
wastes to POTWs. Some of the preliminary treatment may be conducted in land-based units. In
general, the end-of-pipe treatment, involving primary and biological treatment processes, is
conducted in land-based units. All of the 17 direct dischargers (under NPDES) perform end-of-
pipe treatment in land-based units. These 17 direct dischargers generate and treat a total of 1,115
million gallons per year of wastewaters. The development document also indicated that up to 25
facilities use land-based units to handle or treat wastewaters. Exhibit 11-7 shows the maximum
detected toxic pollutant concentrations in wastewaters under Category 1 after the primary
treatment processes.
As indicated by Exhibits 11-6 and 11-7, the maximum concentrations of several underlying
hazardous constituents in the wastewaters that may be managed in land-based units are above
UTS. Also, several of the wastewaters contain TC organics. The data, however, were not
sufficient to identify specific facilities and specific wastewater volumes that may be affected by
today's proposed rule.
-------
11-14
EXHIBIT 11-6
TOXIC POLLUTANTS DETECTED IN SULFIDE OXIDATION
EFFLUENTS IN CATEGORY ONEa
Chemical Constituent
Lead
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Nickel
Zinc*
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene*
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Naphthalene
4-Nitrophenol
Peritachlbrbphenbl
Phenol* -.----
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Diethyl Phthalate*
Toluene
UTS
(mg/1)
0.690
0.690
2.770
3.980
2.610
0.140
0.057
0.036
0.088
0.044
0.036
0.059
—
~0:089
"0.039
0.280
0.200
0.080
Maximum
Concentration
(mg/1)
0.52
0.02
1.50
1.00
1.08
15.00
1.86
0.03
0.11
0.01
0.01
0.08
0.02
6.10
0.20
0.26
0.14
1.20
0.04
• U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. tit.
' Concentration exceeds UTS.
-------
11-15
EXHIBIT 11-7
TOXIC POLLUTANTS DETECTED IN PRIMARY
EFFLUENTS IN CATEGORY ONE"
Chemical Constituent
Lead*
Chromium*
Copper
Nickel
Zinc
Benzene
Chlorobenzene*
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane"
2,4,6-Trichlorophenor
Chloroform*
1,2-Dichlorobenzene*
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene*
1,2-Trans-dichloroethylene
2,4-Dichlorophenol*
2,4-Dimethylphenol*
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Ethylbenzene*
Fluoranthene
Methylene Chloride*
Naphthalene*
Nitrobenzene •
4-Nitrophenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Pentachlorophenol*
Phenol*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
UTS Level
(mg/1)
0.690
2.770
—
3.980
2.610
0.140
.0.057
0.057
0.035
0.046
0.036
0.088
0.090
— ;;:••'•'•
0.044
0.036
0.087
0.057
0.068
0.089
0.059
0.068
—
0.4
0.089
0.039
0.280
Maximum Concentration
(mg/1)
3.20
120.00
0.14
0.19
2.60
0.01
2.80
0.45
10.50
0.05
0.35
0.05
0.10
0.02
0.08
0.05
0.02
0.97
0.01
0.60
0.10
0.03
2.36
0.04
11.00
2.75
0.20
-------
11-16
EXHIBIT 11-7
TOXIC POLLUTANTS DETECTED IN PRIMARY EFFLUENTS
IN CATEGORY ONE" (continued)
Chemical Constituent
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate
Diethyl Phthalate
Fluorene
Pyrene
.Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene*
Trichloroethylene*
UTS Level
(mg/1)
0.057
0.2
0.059
0.067
0.056
0.080
0.054
Maximum Concentration
(mg/1)
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.52
0.25
a U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. cit.
" Concentration exceeds UTS
11.5.2 POTW Report to Congress (RTC)
The 1986 RTC12 evaluated the types, sources, and quantities of hazardous wastewaters
that are discharged to POTWs. The RTC indicated that there were a total of 160 facilities, of
which 17 facilities were direct dischargers, 141 facilities were indirect dischargers, and 2 facilities
were zero dischargers. These numbers match those indicated by the development document.13
However, the total indirect discharge flow indicated by the POTW report is significantly less than
that indicated by the development document. The RTC indicated a total flow of 6.4 million
gallons per day while that indicated by the development document was 4S.7 million gallons per
day. Based on the comments by an industry expert14 and the depth of information provided in
these two sources, EPA has based its total wastewater flow estimates on information given in the
development document The shortcomings of this report for the purposes of this analysis are that
it concentrates on total mass loadings instead of concentrations and does not provide any data on
the use of land-based units.
The RTC also indicated that spent solvents accounted for 90 percent of the hazardous
wastes generated by small quantity generators. Since the processes used are similar, EPA assumes
that large quantity generators would also generate hazardous wastes with similar characteristics.
Furthermore, since the manufacturing processes used by the direct and indirect dischargers are
similar, EPA extrapolates and assumes that 90 percent of all raw wastewaters generated by the
leather tanning and finishing industry would contain spent solvents and carry the listed F001
12 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), op. cit
13 U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op cit.
14 Personal communication with Frank Rutland, 1994 (September 20), op. cit.
-------
11-17
through F005 codes for the solvents. Qualitatively, this is highly likely since most tanning facilities
use solvents, in their operations.
The RTC also presented data on wastewater characteristics that indicated the presence of
several constituents .above UTS. Exhibit 11-8 presents the typical characteristics of wastewaters
discharged to POTWs from leather tanning and finishing facilities.
EXHIBIT 11-8
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF POLLUTANTS IN WASTEWATERS
DISCHARGED TO POTWsa
Constituent
Arsenic
Benzene*
Cadmium
Chloroform*
Chromium*
Lead*
Mercury
Methylene chloride
Nickel
Silver
Toluene
Zinc*
Discharge to POTW Maximum
Concentration (mg/1)
0.003
0.28
03
0.149
178.75
85.43
0.00088
0.005
0.2
0.012
0.008
4.7
UTS Concentration (mg/1)
1.4
0.14 ,
0.69
0.046
2.77
0.69
0.15
0.089
3.98
0.43
0.08
2.61
8 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), op. ctt
* Concentration exceeds UTS. . ,
11.53 Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
EPA retrieved data from the Waste Generation and Management (GM) forms15 of the
BRS for all wastes that carried the SIC code of 3111. The data set used for this analysis are
provided in Attachment 11-1.
15 For a description of the GM and other forms, as well as the data input codes, see U.S. EPA, 1991
(August), 1991 Hazardous Waste Report: Instructions and Forms, OMB # 2050-0024, EPA Form 8700-13
A/B(5-80).
-------
11-18
The BRS data only indicated one solid waste stream and four liquid waste streams that
were treated on site. All of the liquid wastes carried the listed solvents codes and, hence, will not
be affected by this rule.
EPA also reviewed data from the GM forms for wastes that were managed off site. The
data only contained 10 solid waste streams and 30 liquid waste streams that were generated at 21
facilities and sent off site for treatment. Most of these wastes carried the listed EPA codes for
solvents. Only 2 of the solid wastes carried listed codes. Of the liquid wastes, there were only 6
characteristic wastes that did not include any listed codes. Based on the processes generally
employed, these liquid wastes may contain underlying hazardous constituents.
EPA reviewed the data from the PS forms for obtaining information on how the solid and
liquid wastes were treated. This information was very sparse, covering only 4 solid waste streams
and 12 liquid waste streams. The 4 solid wastes were managed in different units: one waste was
managed in a RCRA-regulated landfill, one waste was managed in a container, and two wastes
were managed in tanks that were exempt from all regulations. Most of the liquid wastes,
however, were managed in tanks — 3 wastes were managed in other unspecified types of land-
based units that were exempt from all regulations. With the exception of two state-regulated
tanks, all of these tanks were claimed to be exempt from all regulations.
The information contained in the BRS for the leather tanning and finishing industry is too
sparse to extrapolate for the entire industry. The general lack of information in the BRS seems
to indicate that, in general, the facilities do not consider their wastes to be hazardous and also do
not consider their treatment systems to be hazardous waste treatment systems.
11.5.4 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
EPA has reviewed the toxic release inventory and did not find any applicable information
for this analysis. : ; .
11.5.5 Permit Compliance System (PCS)
EPA found that 3 of the 5 leather tanning direct dischargers providing information on
their treatment types in the PCS used one of the treatment types that indicated the potential use
of a land-based unit Many sites did not report their treatment type in the PCS and not all
potentially affected facilities are included in the database. Also,, some of these sites may not
generate the proposed ICRT wastes. These factors lead to uncertainty, in the use of these data;
however, this information provides perhaps an order of magnitude range for the number of
leather tanning and finishing facilities that EPA can expect to use land placement
11.5.6 Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey
The Subtitle D Industrial Non-hazardous Waste Screening Survey provides information
regarding whether wastes are managed on site in Subtitle D land-based units at industrial
facilities. For each of the facilities surveyed, information was gathered on the quantities of total
waste generated each year, and how the waste is distributed among surface impoundments,
-------
11-19
landfills, waste piles, and land application units. All numbers in the final report16 were
extrapolated to the entire industry sector.
In April 1989, EPA analyzed these and other data to further characterize the industrial
Subtitle D universe. The EPA analysis indicated that of the 1,586 facilities in the leather
industry (SIC code 31) there are 27 facilities (approximately 2 percent) that use land-based units
to treat approximately 168 million tons of wastewater.
The Industrial Subtitle D Survey has several important limitations. The information is
based on waste quantities in 1985 and does not provide information that can be used to determine
the waste characteristics or waste composition. Also, SIC code 31 encompasses more than just
the leather tanning and finishing industry. However, EPA believes that most or all of these
facilities that use land-based units are, likely to be leather tanning and finishing facilities since the
other industries in the leather sector manufacture specific leather goods and generally do not
generate significant quantities of wastewaters to require the use of land-based units.
11.5.7 Industry Studies Database (ISDB)
EPA has reviewed the ISDB and did not find any applicable information for this analysis:
11.5.8 Industry Contacts
In order to better understand the leather tanning and finishing industry, EPA interviewed
a trade association contact18 and has tried to contact several major leather tanning industries.
The trade association contact made the following key points:
• The past regulations and other market factors have put most tanneries out of
business. There are only 60 to 65 tanneries currently operating with maybe 30 to
35 more facilities that only do leather finishing. The facilities that only do leather
finishing generate little or no wastewaters.
• The leather tanning and finishing industry processes have not changed since the
last two decades. The 1982 development document is still the best document
available that characterizes the industry. -
• Most of these facilities are very old and are located in urban locations, precluding
the space required for lagoons. Hence, all of the pretreatment and treatment at
most of the facilities are done in tanks.
• There are only 2 to'5 facilities that currently use land-based units for managing
their wastewatersr
16 Westat Inc., 1987 (December 29), Screening Survey of Industrial Subtitle D Establishments, Draft
Final Report, submitted to EPA.
17 ICF Inc., 1989 (April 3), Characterization of the Industrial Subtitle D Universe, Results of First Task,
memorandum to EPA.
18 Personal communication with Frank Rutland, 1994 (September 20), op. cit
-------
11-20
In addition, EPA contacted staff from several facilities. These facilities were selected for
follow-up on their BRS data submissions and telephone interviews were conducted to collect
more information on the waste generation and management practices followed by these facilities.
The information obtained is summarized in Exhibit 11-9. Detailed information obtained from the
facilities is provided in the form of telephone logs in Attachment 11-2.
EXHIBIT 11-9
SUMMARY OF BRS FOLLOW-UP CONTACTS
Company Name
Greiner William Co.,
Inc.
Seton Company3
Wolverine Worldwide
Inc.3
Worth, Inc.3
ICRT
Wastes
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Land-
Based
Units
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Constituent
Concentrations
above UTS
?
NA
NA
NA
Quantity
Discharged
NA
NA
NA
NA
Direct
Discharger '
NA
NA
NA
NA
Indirect
Discharger
NA •
NA
NA
NA
Zero
Discharger
NA
•NA
NA
NA
a EPA was unable to obtain any significant data from the contacts.
NA - Not available
11.5.9 Comments to Previous Rules
EPA has reviewed the comments to previous rules and did not find any applicable
information for this analysis.
11.5.10 TC RIA
Another source, a TC RIA report19 presented estimates of waste generation by the
leather industry. This document is part of a series of background documents for the rule on
toxicity characteristic wastes. This report characterized the 384 leather tanning and finishing
facilities that were operating at the time of the compilation of the report. However, the total
wastewater generation indicated by the TC RIA is significantly less than that indicated by the ,
development document. The TC RIA indicated a total generation of 2.3 million tons of
wastewater per year while that indicated by the development document was 52 million tons per
yean Based on the comments by an industry expert20 and the depth of information provided in
these two sources, EPA has based its total wastewater flow estimates on information given in the
development document The TC RIA indicated that the leather tanning and finishing industry
19 U.S. EPA 1987 (May 27), Estimates of Waste Generation by Cettulbsic Manmade Fibers, Synthetic
Organic Fibers, Petroleum Refining, Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products, Leather Tanning and
Finishing, Oil and Gas Transportation Industries, and the Laundry, Cleaning and Garment Services, Draft
Report, Office of Solid Waste.
20 Personal communication with Frank Rutland, 1994 (September 20), op. cit
-------
11-21
(SIC code 3111) produces essentially all of the waste generated by the leather sector (SIC code
31). The RIA also indicated that 85 percent of the wastewater generated by the leather tanning
and finishing industry was sent to POTWs with the rest being treated on site.
11.5.11 Other Data Sources
The summary statistics for the leather tanning and finishing industry were presented in the
1987 Census of Manufacturers.21 As of 1987, there were a total of 311 facilities, including 16
converters and 45 contract .tanneries, in the leather tanning and finishing industry. Approximately
60 percent of these facilities employed less than 20 workers each. There were only 38 tanneries,
accounting for approximately 11 percent of all tanneries, that employed more than 100 employees.
EPA also reviewed industry comments on related rules, such as the Phase II Rule, the
Emergency Rule, and the Notice of Data Availability for information regarding the management
of wastes at leather tanning facilities. However, EPA did not find any data that would support
this analysis.
11.6 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS
This section presents an estimate of the number of facilities and quantity of wastewater
affected by today's proposed rule. The exact number of facilities in this industry is unclear.
According to the effluent limitations guidelines development document22 and the POTW.
Report to Congress23, as of November 1982, there were approximately 160 facilities in the
leather tanning and finishing industry. According to another data source, in 1987, there were 311
facilities in the leather tanning and finishing industry.24 However, according to an industry
expert, the number of leather tanning'and finishing establishments is now estimated to be less
than lOO.25 In this analysis, EPA used the effluent guidelines development document and
POTW report estimates of 160 facilities.
As indicated by the POTW Report to Congress, EPA estimates that there are a total of
160 facilities, of which 17 facilities are direct dischargers, 141 facilities are indirect dischargers, and
2 facilities are zero dischargers. Based on information provided in the development document
and Subtitle D Screening Survey26, EPA estimates that all of the 17 direct dischargers use land-
based units, and in addition, 8 other facilities use land-based units. EPA used the following
assumptions to estimate the number of facilities and wastewater. volumes that may be affected by
today's rule:
21
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1990 (January), op. tit
22 U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), op. cit
23
U.S. EPA, 1986 (November), op. cit
24 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1990 (January), op. cit
** Personal communication with Frank Rutland, 1994 (September 20), op. tit
26 ICF Inc., 1989 (April 3), op. ciL
-------
11-22
• " EPA assumed that most facilities aggregate their characteristic wastewaters with
• other non-hazardous wastewaters prior to treatment.
• The characterization data presented in the development document and the POTW
Report to Congress indicated that all wastewaters generated by this industry
contain pollutants above UTS and that most of these pollutants are not addressed
by technology-based standards.
• The POTW Report to Congress indicated that spent solvents accounted for 90
percent of the hazardous wastes generated by small quantity generators. Since the
manufacturing processes used by all the leather tanning facilities are similar, EPA
extrapolates and assumes that 90 percent of all raw wastewaters generated by the
leather tanning and finishing industry would contain spent solvents and carry the ~
listed F001 through F005 codes for the solvents. Qualitatively, this is highly likely
since most tanning facilities use solvents in their operations. Also, this assumption
is supported by the data presented in the 1991 BRS.27
• This rule may not impact all the wastewaters at these facilities. EPA believes that
the large volumes of wastewaters that carry the RCRA listed codes are segregated
from other characteristic wastes and are treated appropriately under the existing
RCRA regulations for listed wastes. The remaining raw wastewaters (10 percent
of the total generation) that are managed in land-based units may be affected by
today's rule.
• All wastewater volumes were estimated using average wastewater flows given in
the development document with the assumption that the tanneries operate at their
100 percent daily capacity for 250 days a year.
Using the data and assumptions outlined above, EPA estimates that approximately 3 to 25
facilities and 0.8 to 7.5 million tons of wastewaters per year may require alternative treatment due
to today's rule. Most of the available data are several years old with some of the data being more
than 20 years old. This rule may, in reality, have a very low impact on the leather tanning and
finishing industry. Several practices may have changed in light of the RCRA program. For
example, facilities may be segregating their wastewaters and treating them separately in tanks.
27
U.S. EPA, 1991 (August), op. tit
-------
ATTACHMENT 11-1
TOP 25 FACILITIES REPORTING ICRT WASTES
IN THE 1991 BIENNIAL REPORTING SYSTEM
-------
BRS 91 Overtlgh.
DATE i 09/06/94
a PS form* («• of 7/94)
GM Pagei for Watt* Managed On-i1ta
SIC CODE - LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING INDUSTRY
Facility '
10
Facility
Nane
GM
City Pago
Origin
SIC Coda
Source
Coda
Font
PCd Code
1991 Ton*
6anaratad
C00007069974
CAS Number*
Wait* Description .
WESTERN TANNING INC
DELTA
3111.
A64
830*
0.0
t REACTIVE SULFINEt UNHAtRINO OPERATION DURING TANNING UP TO APPROXIMATELY MAY 1990. USED SOOtuM SULF1DE OR SODIUM SULF-
HYDRATE. . .
Coanontt . I AIR OXIDATION FOLLOWED IT BURIAL .IN SECURE, APPROVED LAND-
Onilto Info (Syitm/Qty) i M12S/7.489.6 . . > .
Wilt* Coda* i D00» ;
PS Paa* Syttea Regulatory Stetut Operational Statu* Unit Typo*
FILL.
01
01
07
MED001065S80 •
CAS NuiBbort
Wait* Description
CoatMnti
On*It* Info (Syitm/Qty) I M021/2I.B
Watt* Cod**
IRVING TANNING CO
I 00108-80-3 01330-20-7
I STILL BOTTOMS. FLAMMABLE, LIQUID
I • . . ''
HARTLANO
3111
A09
B209
7.0
PS Pag* sX*tMI R*gu1*tery Statui
i 0001 FOOJ F005
to
09
Oparatlonal Statu*
01
Unit Typo*
01
NC000238896S LACMWAMNA LEATHER COMPANY INC CONOVER 3 3111
CAS Humbert I 00067-64-1 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 00110-82-7
Wait* Da.crlptlon i STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED FROM ON SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT NONE HALOGENATED SOLVENT.
Comnontl I QUATITY GIVEN IN POUNDS , .
On*It* Info (SyitM/Qty) i M021/17.3 . . ' '
Watt* Cod*i > 0001 D007 F003 FOOS , ' .
PS Pag* SyttM* Regulatory Statu* Operation*! Statu* Unit Type* •
A21
B20J
26.0
PAD0014679SO LOEWENGART k CO., INC. . . MERCERSBURG .
CAS NiMbtrt I 00067-64-1 00100-41-4 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Watte Detcrlptlon
3111
A21
B203
SS.O
nt*
• I IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM LEATHER FINISHING OPERATIONiMIX TURE OF SOLVENTS XYLENE. ACETONE. ETHYL BENZENE .METHYL ISOBUTY
L «TONE.METHYL ETHYL KETONE AND TOLUENE. ,
l SECTION 1, BO* El ALSO SOURCE CODE A09 .
On*He Info (Sytten/Qty) : H021/2S.O
Watte Codet
a,
0001 F003 FOOS
PS Page Syitw
M021
Regulatory Statui
08
Operation*) Statui
06
Unit Typet
10
SAXTON
1
3111
PAD0701S6124 SETON COMPANY. LEATHER DIVISION
CAS Nunbert l 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 . . -
Watte Detcrlptlon. t WASTEWATER AND PIGMENTS FROM LEATHER FINISHING PROCESS'AND C LEAN-UP COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID.
Cement* i CAS It 111-76-2
Ontlte'lnfo (Syttem/Qty) i M032/S9.2
A29
B10I
649.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE I 0»/0»/94
Facility
ID
- GM a PS forms (es of 7/94)
Facility
Name
~ GM Pages for
SIC CODE • LEATHER
City
Waste Maneged Off-site
TANNING AND FINISHING INDUSTRY
GM
Page SIC
Origin Source Form
Code Code POM Cod*
1991 Tons
Concreted
NAPA
3111
1
CAD909127028 SAWYER OF NAPA INC
CAS Numbers I 07440-47-3 . ', •
Weste Description t LEATHER IUFFIH8 OUST
Ccenents - I SEC.l.H. LEATHER DUST FROM BUFFING DRY TANNED SKINS. SEC.IV. A. PLANT CLOSED IN DECEMBER 1990.
Offslt* Info (Syst*»/Qty) I HIM/27.7 . .
Witt* Cod*» i .
PS Page Sy steal Regulatory Status Operational SUtus Unit Types
A99
B40«
28.0
CAD009127028 SAWYER OF NAPA INC NAPA
CAS Nunbora . l 07440-47-J
Witt* Description I WASTE FROM BOTTOM OF TANNING VATS.
Commits • I SEC. IV. PLANT CLOSED IN DECEMBER 1990. SEC. IF'- A56
Offslt* Info (Systen/Qty) t M132/9.7
Wist* C«d*s .1 . .
PS P«g* System R*gu1«tory Status Operational Status Unit Types
3111
A09
B404
10.0
CAD009127028 SAWYER OF NAPA INC NAPA
CAS Numbers ' i 07440-47-3 .
Waste Description I WASTE FROM BOTTOM OF TANK CONTAINING CHROME PROCESS LIQUORS.
Consents t SEC. IV. PLANT CLOSED IN DECEMBER 1990. SEC. IF: AS6 •
Offslte Info (Syste*/Qty) i H132/4.9
Wast* Codas l
PS Peg* System Regulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types
3111
A09
B404
9.0
NAPA
3111
CAD00912702S SAWYER OF MAPA INC
CAS Hunkers . l 00127-18-4 .
Waste Description l ACTIVATED CHARCOAL WASTE FROM ACTIVA AIR SCRUBBER CONTAINING TETRACHLOROETHVLENE.
CotMntS 1 SEC IV. PLANT CLOSED IN DECEMBER 1990.
Offslte Info (Syst*>/Qty) l M132/2.0
Weste Codes i 0039 •
PS Page System Regulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types ,
A7B
B404
2.0
HDD003062114
CAS Ni«ab*rs
Wast* Description
Cements
GARDEN STATE TANNING-W.O. BYRON PLANT WILLIAMSPOBT
t 00067-64-1 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
l IGNITABLE WASTE SOLVENT FROM CLEANING HOSES IN SPRAYING
MEK. MIBK, TOLUENE, XYLENE AND CYCLOHEXANONE
1
3111
A09
B203
160.0
UNITS IN THE LEATHER FINISHING OPERATION CONTAINING ACETONE,
: SEC. IV-B: DURING 1991 WE PHASED OUT ALL SOLVENT BASED FINISHING PROC-
ESSES AND REPLACE THEM WITH WATER BASED FINISHING PROCESSES. THIS ELIMINATED OUR HAZARDOUS SOLVENT WASTE.
Offtlte Info (System/Qty) : M02Z/170.0
Waste Codes . t F003 FOOS
PS Pag« Systan Ragulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types
-------
Facility
10 '
City
P*g*
SIC
Origin
Cod*
Source
Cod*
POM
Fom
Cod*
1991 Tont
6*n*r*t*d
HED00106S580 IRVING TANNING CO
CAS Numb*rs t 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Wast* Description : STILL BOTTOMS. FLAMMABLE LIQUID
Comments i '
Off.1t* Info (Systm/Qty) I H021/2.9 M021/2.0 M021/1.S
Wilt* Cod*t I 0001 FQ03 FOOS
PS Pege sX?twB Regulatory Status Operational Status
HARTLAND
3111
A0»
(209
H021/0.7
09
01
Unit Types
01
7.0
BERWICK
I WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUID. IGNITABLE (MINERAL SPIRITS, 2-PROPOX YETHANOL)
HED001096395 PRIME TANNING CO
CAS Humbert t
Watt* 0«»cr1pt1on
Cements t
Offtlt* Info (System/Qty) I MOS1/47.8 H061/30.7 HOSl/ll.t HOS1/S.1 M042/3.5
Wait* Code* I 0001 0007 D008
PS Pag* System R*gul*tory Status Operational Status Unit Typ*s
,1
3111
A29
B219
99.0
OWN CO ' ' BIDDEFORD ' ' ~ 1 3111
I 00078-93-3 00108-88-3 .
\j . - - .
> FLAMMABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM COATING OPERATION. MIXTURE OF M EK, TOLUENE, AND IPA
HED98546627S
CAS Numbers
Vast* Description
Cements t
Offtlt* Info (Systom/Qty) i M061/12.5
Waste Codes t 0001 D03S F003 FOOS .
PS Pege Systen Reguletory Status Operational Status Unit Types
A21
B203
12.p
MI000601372B EAGLE OTTAWA LEATHER CO. GRAND HAVEN
CAS Numbers I 00067-64-1 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Waste Description
3111
A21
B209
I IGNITABLE WASTEPAINT RELATED MATERIALS FROM COATING-OPERATIC N IN LEATHER MANUFACTURE; MIXTURE CONTAINING TOLUENE, XYLENE
S, ACETONE, MEK, AND MI Bit. , .
Consents i
Off.1t. Info (System/Qty) I MOM/238.3 M061/109.2
Wast* Codes I 0001 F003 FOOS
PS Pege System Regulatory Stetus Operational Status Unit Types
347.0
GRAND HAVEN
I OUTDATED AND OBSOLETE LABORATORY CHEMICALS FROM ON-SITE RESE ARCH AND TESTING LABORATORIES.
HI0006013724 EAGLE OTTAWA LEATHER CO
CAS Numb.ors I
W*st* Description
Conments '
Off.lt* Info (System/Qty) i M049/0.1
Waste Codes i 0001 0002 0007 U122 U219
PS P*g* Syst*m Regulatory Status Op*r*t1on*1 Status Unit Type.
3111
A94
BOOt
0.0
HN0982427452
USER TANNING COMPANY
OWATONNA
3111
A99
B103
75.0
-------
Facility Facility '. • GH Origin Sourc* tor* 1991 Tent
10 Nt»o CUy Pag* • SIC Cod* Cod* POM Cod* Benereted
LBS/GAL' IN ORDER TO PASS DATA ASSESSMENT EDIT.
OfftU* Info (Syttem/Qty) I H071/7S.O
Watt* Cod** :• 000? 0007
PS P*g* Sytten Regulatory Stetut Operational Statut Unit Typ*t
NC000238896S LA.CKAWANNA LEATHER COMPANY INC . CONOVER • 3 3111 1 AZi I BZOi 26.0
CAS NueOert : 000(7-64-1 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 00110-82-7
Wait* Description I STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED FROM ON SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT NONE HALOGENATED SOLVENT.
CoMMntt : QUATITY GIVEN IN POUNDS
Offtit* Info (Sytt*»/Qty) t H061/21.8 M061/4.2
Watt* Cod** i 0001 0007 F003 FOOS
PS Pag* Syitm) Roguletory Statu* Operational Statu* Unit Typet •
NED080209950LACKAWANNA LEATHER " •OMAHA ' " 1 3111 1 A37'i B20920.0
CAS Hueb*r* ;. I 00078-93-3 00108-88-3 01330-20-7 .
We*t* Oeterlptlon t IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM CLEANING'PERLON LINES ON A PAIN TING MACHINE AND GENERAL CLEAN. ALSO, PAINT OVERSPRAV CONTA
INING TOLUENE AND XYLCNE AND METHYL ETHYL KETONE. '
Comwnt* ' t SEC. I. BOX H| FORM CODE. ALSO Bill.
Offtlt* Info (Syttea/Qty) t M061/17.6 H061/2.4 . .
Wette Code* i 0001 0035 F003 FOOS
PS Page Syttw Regulatory Statu* Operation*) Statut Unit Typei • -
NJD002160166 AMERICAN LEATHER MFG CO ' RAHWAY ' • 1 3lTi 1 A29 i B20J 4.0
CAS Hurt.r. I 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3
Wttt* Deicrlptlon I FLAfMABLE LIQUID FROM SPRAYING OF UPHOLSTERY lEATHEft, H1XTU- RE OF TOLUENE, MEK, AND MIBK.
Caoecnt* i SECTION 1. BOX Ft SPRAYING OF UPHOLSTERY LEATHER. :
OffaUe Info (Systeie/qty) i M041/3.S •
Watte Code* i F003
PS Page Sytte* Regulatory Statu* Operational Statu* Unit Typet
NJD011606571. SUPERIOR DYED FURS LTD PASSAIC ~' " 3 3111 1 A19 i »302 '. 2.0
CAS Nwtben I 00079-01-6 .
Watt* Oetcrtptten . i TRICHLOROETHYLENE CONTAMINATED SAW DUST GENERATED FROM DECREASING OPERATIONS
Offtlt* Info (Sytteii/Qty) ; M043/1.7 , '
W*tte Codet : 0040 • .
PS Page Syttw Regulatory Statut Operational Statut Unit Typet
i H043 11 06 NA 02 . •
NJD139C89327 UOO FINISHING COMPANY NEWARK ~ 3 3111 I A2l i B203 To"
CAS Nueibert : ,
Watte Dotcrlptlon i OVERSPRAY AND CANCELLED ORDER MATERIALS AND LEFT OVER. STILL BOTTOMS
Cgenxntt : '
Off.It. Info (Syttem/Qty) : M051/1.4 -
Wttte Cedet : FOOS
PS Page Sytten Regulatory. Stetut Operational Statut Unit Typet
-------
Facility
ID
aclllty
City
Origin Source Form
i-«g« SIC Cod* Cod* I>OM Cod*
1891 Tom
G*n*rat«d
MJD981131196
CAS Numbers
Wait* Description
SCMMRZ LEATHER COMPANY
t OK - -
CARLSTADT
I MIXTURE OF TOLUENE BUTYL ACETATE AND LEATHER COATINGS;
FINISHING
1 3111 1 «9 Z (Zll
WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUID FROM SPRAY OPERATION IN LEATHER
Comint* I
Of flit* Info (System/Qty) : MOZ9/1.3 MOZ9/1.2
w*st* codes i oooi Door oooe boas FOOS
• *
PS Pag* System Regulatory Status Operational Statu* Unit Typ**
3.0
NYDOOZ1ZCB10 MOENCH TANN . BOWANOA . , ...
CAS Numbera i 01330-ZO-7
Watt* Description i FLAMMABLE WASTE LIQUID FINISH. LACQUERS » DYES. XYLENE
Contents , I CONVERT SPRAY FINISH FROM SOLVENT TO WATERBASED.
Offslte Info (System/Qty) I M051/16.1
Waste Codes I FOOS .
PS Page ' Syste* Regulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types
3111
AZJ
1 BZ01
16.0
MOENCH TANN
GOWANDA
I EQUIPMENT CONTAINING FLUID CONTAMINATED WITH PCB
NYDOOZ1Z6910
CAS Numbers
Waste Description
CooMnta t
Offslte Info (Systm/Qty) i M04J/0..3
Wast* Codes . ' ' i .
PS Page System Regulatory St*tu* Operational Status Unit Types
3111
A93
1 B309
0.0
NYDOOZ1ZC910 MOENCN TANN GOWANDA
CAS Nwnbers . I LABP - - • •
Wast* Description I LAB PACKS-HISC OBSELETE CHEMICALS OF LESS THAN 100 CMS.
Consent* i
Offslte Info (Systew/Qty) i M141/0.0 .
Waste Code's : 0001 0003 0010 0124 U134
PS P*g*' System Regulatory Stitus pp*r*t1on*l Status Unit Type*
S . 3111 Z
Asa t BOOI
0.0
NYDOOZ1ZB910 . .MOENCH TANN GOWANDA
CAS Ninbtrs t LABP - -
Wast* Description I LAB PACKS-HISC OBSELETE ACUTE CHEMICALS OF L.T. 100 CMS
Consents i .
Offslt* Info (Systm/Qty) i M141/0.0
Watt* Cod.. , i P098 PI06 P10B
PS P*g* System Regulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types
6 3111 Z
ASB 1 B004
0.0
OH0004ZOZ644
CONNCAUT LEATHER INC
CONNEAUT
1 3111
14.0
-------
Facility Facility • GM Origin Source Fora 1911 Tent
ID ' NMW City , Pege SIC Cod* Cod* POM Cod* Generated
Coanentt i
Off.1t* Info (Syttm/qty) i M999/13.9 .
U*(t* Cod*t • i 0001 F003 F005 . . . ' , '
PS Peg* Sytteai R*guUtory Stetut Operational Statui Unit Typ*i
OHD004ZOZ644 CONNEAUT LEATHER INC ' ;. CONNEAUT . ~ i 3111 '. ~ 1.0'
CAS Nunbert t
Watte Description i HAZARDOUS WASTE LIQUID MM C
CoMMntt i ...
OffilU Info (Syttan/qty) i M999/0.7
W*(t* Cod«» : 0006
PS P*g* Sytten R*gul*tory St*tut Operation*! Status Unit Typo
f
PAD0014679SO LOEWENGART t CO.. INC. . MERCERSBURO 1 3111 1 A21 I (203 55.0
CAS Nunbert I 00087-64-1 00100-41-4 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Wtfta Detcrlptlon I 1GNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM LEATHER FINISHING OPERATION;MIX TURE OF SOLVENTS XYLENE.ACETONE.ETHYL BENZENE .METHYL ISOBUTV
L KETONE.METHYL ETHYL KETONE AND TOLUENE.
CoMwnta : SECTION 1. BOX Ei ALSO SOURCE CODE A09
Offtlt* Info (Sytt«i/qty) : H051/26.0 MOJ1/3.S
Watt* Coda. t 0001 F003 F005
PS Pap* Syttm Regulatory Statut . Operational Statui Unit Typat ,
I H021 08 06 10
PAD0014679SO LOEWENGART ft CO.. INC. ' • HCRCERSBURG ' 2 3111 B Sirs i B203 9.0
CAS Nwabert < 00067-64-1 00100-4.1-4 . 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Wait* Description t IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENT FROM RECYCLING OPERATIONiMIXTURE OF' SOLVENTS XYLENE.ACETONE.ETHYL BENZENE,M£TH»L tSOBUTYL KETONE
.METHYL ETHYL KETONE AND TOLUENE.
Coaaient* ' • . i .
Of flit* Info (Syttn/Qty) i M05J/8.8 . •
Watte Cod** I 0001 F003 FOOS
PS Pag* •' Sytteai Regulatory Statui Operational Stetua Unit Typet '
I H021 08 06 10 .
PADOS16S2840 GARDEN STATE TANNINO ! FLEETWOOO [ - ' ' 1 3111 1 A21 C B20« 315.0
CAS NuHbert .: 00078-93-3 0009S-47-6 00108-10-1 00108-88-3
Watt* Detcrlptlon I IGNITABLE, SPENT SOLVENT, RESIN, PIGMENT MIXTURE FROM LEATHE R FINISHING OPERATION AND CLEANING. MOISTURE CONSIST OF METH
VL ETHYL KETONE, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE. TOLVENE ACETONE.
Comontt t CAS NUMBER 108-94-1
Offtlte Info (Sytteia/qty) : M051/192.8 MOS1/1ZZ.O
Watte Codet i F003 F005
PS Pag* Syttarn Regulatory Stttut Operational Statut Unit Typet ' • '
PAD0704S6124 'SETON COMPANY, LEATHER DIVISION SAXTON ~ 1 3111 I *29 I BlOl '• (49.0
CAS Humbert : 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3
Watte Detcrlptlon : WASTEWATER AND PIGMENTS FROM LEATHER FINISHING PROCESS AND C LEAN-UP COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID.
Coamenta : CAS li T11-76-Z ' .
Off.lt* Info (Sytteie/qty) i M061/S6.8 . .
Watte Codet : 0035 FOOS
-------
Facility
ID .
PS Page
Syst«
M032
aclllty
Nam*
a Regulatory Status
08
City
Operational Statui Unit Types
01 01
Origin Sourc* Form
Page SIC Code Code . POM Code
1991 Tons
Generated
PAD0704S6124 SETON COMPANY. LEATHER DIVISION SAX TON 2 3111 1 A29 1 (209 181.0
CAS Numbers • I 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7 -
Wot* Description i SOLVENT WASTE FROM LEATHER FINISHING PROCESS AND CLEAN-UP FL AMMABLE LIQUID TOLUENE. HIBK. AN0 HEK.
Cements i • . •
Offslte Info (Syttw/Qty) t M061/11S.3 H061/6C.1
Wot* Cod*t t 0001 0035 F003 FOOS
PS P*g* System R*gu1*tory Stitui Operational Status Unit Typo
I H032 08 01 01
PAD070456124SETON COMPANr. LEATHER DIVISION SAXTON11 3111 5 ' AB9 ~1404 59.0
CAS Numbers I 00078-93-3 00108-10-1
Wait* Description I FILTER CAKE WASTE FROM WASTEWATER TREATMENT FILTER PflESS.
ConMntt i CAS Is 111-76-Z
Offslt* Info (Syat*m/Qty) 1 MOS1/54.1 HQ43/4.8 •
Wait* Codai . i 0001 0035 FOOS • .
PS Pag* System Regulatory Statui Operational Status Unit Typai
I H032 ' 08 01 01 .
PAD070456124 SETON COMPANY. LEATHER'DIVISION SAXTON 1 3111 1 ~ A29 i B409 38.0
CAS Ninb*rt I 00078-93-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Watte Description i PRODUCTION WASTE FROM LEATHER FINISHING PROCESS AND CLEANUP INCLUDING RAGS. WOOD. AND PLASTIC TAINTED WITH PAINT.
Comment! I CAS ft 111-76-2 .
Offllt* Info (Systm/Oty) I M061/36.9 M043/1.3
Wasta Cod*s • t 0001 D035 F003 FOOS -
PS Pag* SystM R*gu1*tory Status Operational Status Unit Types '
I H032 08 > 01 01
PAD0704S6124 SETON COMPANY. LEATHER DIVISION SAXTON ' '• ~7 3lTi 1 A08 t M09 31.0
CAS Numbers I 00078-93-3 . -
Watt* Description i BAND SCRAPPINGS CLEANING OF DRIED PAINT FROM LEATHER FINISHI NG SPRAY BOOTH CONVEYOR BANDS.
Conaents i
Offllt* Info (Systm/Qty) I H061/31.4 .
Wast* Codes : 0001 0035 • '
PS Page System Regulatory Status Operational Statui Unit Types
I M032 08 01 01 ' .
PAD070456124 SETON COMPANY. LEATHER DIVISION SAXTON 8 ] 3111 i A29 i STol 27^0~
CAS Numbers i • . • •
Wast* Description I TANK RESIDUE SLUDGE FROM CLEANING OF LEATHER FINISHING SPRAY BOOTHS. ..
Contents i ' . •
Offslte Info (Systam/Qty) I M061/27.2 ' - _ . ' '
Waste Codes . : D001 '
PS Page System Regulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types
1 H032 08 01 01 •
-------
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Pag*
SIC
Origin
Cod*
Source
Cod*
COM
Form
Cod*
1991 Tent
Generated
Watte Description t TANK RESIDUE SLUDGE FROM CLEANING OF SOLVENT FINISHING SPRAY BOOTHS.
Content! i CAS li 111-76-2
Offtlt* Info (Sytteei/Qty) i M061/9.6
Watte Codes • t 0001 0035 F003 FOOS
PS Pege Systwi Regulatory Stetu* Operational Statue Unit Type*
M032
08
01
01
SAXTON
'10
PAD0704S6124 SETON COMPANY, LEATHER DIVISION
CAS Nunbert > I 00078-93-3 00108-88-3
Watte Description I TANK RESIDUE SLUDGE FROM CLEANING OF WATER BASED FINISHING S PRAY BOOTHS.
Coenentt i CAS fI 111-76-2 .
Offtlte Info (Sytteie/Qty) i H061/I.6
Watt* Codet : 0001 FOOS
.PS Page System Reguletory Statut Operational Stttu* Unit Type*
3111
A29
BlOt
2.0
M032
01
01
PAD0704S6124 SETON COMPANY. LEATHER DIVISION SAXTON
CAS NunlMrt i 00108-88-3 . 01330-20-7
W«tt* Description t IGNITABLE SPENT SOLVENTS FROM PARTS CLEANER.
Unit Typot
01
5 3111 1
A19 1 B2li
0.0
Offtlt* Info (SyttM/Qty) I M029/0.1
W*tt* Cod.t t D001 D01B 0039
PS P*g* sX*t*"<
Rtgulttory Stttut
08
Op*r*t1on*1 Stttut
01
WID00609847* PFISTER t VOGEL TANNING CO MILWAU/EE
CAS Numbirt : 00071-36-3 00108-10-1 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
Watt* D*tcr1ptton i •
CoHMntt • I
Offtlt* Info (Syttm/Qty) I M022/77.7
W*tt* Cod*t ' : F003
PS P>g* Syttm Regulatory St*tut Op*r*t1ona1 St*tut Unit Typ*t
2 3111 1
A2*
B204
89.0
WID006098479 PFISTER » VOGCL TANNING CO
CAS Nuabcrt i
Witt* Description :
Cmnent* i
Offtlte Info (Sytten/Qty) t H132/1.B
W*tt* Cod*t : 0007
PS P*g* • Syttem Regulttory Status
MILWAUKEE
1 3111 2
ASB
B31*
2.0
Operational Statu* Unit Type*
W1098206468S AMITY LEATHER PRODUCTS CO WEST BEND
CAS Humbert . I
W**t* 0**cr1pt1on :
Coenentt i
Offtlte Info (Sy«ticn/Qty) : H029/0.4
Wttte Code* : FOOS
PS Pege Sytten Reguletory Stetut Operational Statut Unit Type*
1 3111 1
A21
B209
0.0
-------
Facility
ID
elllt'y
City
WI0988S7S460 PAUL FLAGQ LEATHER CORP SHEtOYGAN
CAS Nunbers .1
Witt* Description i . .
Commit* t
Offlit* Info (Systeni/Qty) IMOZ9/11.6 M029/7.0
Watte Cod.t t D001
PS P«g« Syttm Regulatory Stttui Optratlonkl Stctu* Unit Typo*
WIT860011041 GEBHARDT-VPGEL LEATHER MILWAUKEE
CAS Numbers :
Waste Description i
Consents • i . .
Offslta Info (System/Qty) i M029/28.7
Waste Codes ' t 0001
PS Page System Regulatory Status Operational Status Unit Types
Origin Sourc* Font 1991 Ton>
SIC Coda Coda POM Coda Ganaratad
3111
A89
BZII
19.0
3111
(201
30.0
-------
\
ATTACHMENT 11-2
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO BRS DATA
-------
11-2-1
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
Greiner William Co., Inc.
Kentucky
10/5/94 - 12/6/94
John Bledsoe
(606) 248-2171
Manisha Shahane
FAX: (606) 248-3933
Main Interview
12/2/94 Mr. Bledsoe indicated that as far as he knows the facility generates no ignitable,
corrosive,.or reactive wastes. The wastes may contain some ammonia.
The facility uses butyl acetate and ethylene glycol in the finishing process. Acids
are neutralized.
To treat the wastewaters the facility uses ponds [the secretary, Wanita, later
specified that the facility uses lagoons]. Lime and chlorine are added during the
treatment process.
He suggested that I speak with Herbert Weinstein (owner) or Warren Peace
(environmental consultant). .
Wanita confirmed that D001 wastes are generated by the facility. However, I have
been unable to speak with either Herbert Weinstein or Warren Peace to date.
-------
11-2-2
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Leather Industry Research Lab
University of Cincinnati,. Ohio
DATE: 9/20/94 .
CONTACT NAME: Frank Rutland, Director of the Leather Association
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (513)556-1200
ICF CONTACT NAME: Shailendra Reddy
INTERVIEW: He made the following points during the conversation:
.He cannot understand how RCRA can regulate wastewaters that are already regulated under
RCRA.
He questioned RCRA's authority to regulate constituents below threshold levels.
The leather tanning and finishing industry processes have not changed since the last two decades.
The 1982 development document is still the best document available that characterizes.the
industry.
The past regulations and other market factors have put most tanneries out of business. There are
only 60-65 tanneries currently operating with maybe 30T35 more facilities that only do leather
finishing. The facilities that only do leather finishing generate little or no wastewaters.
Most of these facilities are very old and are located in urban locations, precluding the 'space
required for lagoons. Hence, all of the pretreatment and treatment at most of the facilities are
done in tanks.
He could only think of 2 facilities (a facility in Kentucky that sends their wastes to a POTW and a
facility in Tennessee that direct discharges their wastes) that use lagoons for treatment He
estimates that there may be at most one to three more facilities that use land-based units.
The facility at Tennessee has a series of 5 ponds that treat the wastewaters prior to discharge
through NPDES. This is the only facility in Tennessee that direct discharges its wastewaters.
He believes that there is very little probability of Gnding information on underlying hazardous
constituents. In general, the facilities only keep track (and monitor) information that is required
under current regulations. He suggested that EPA should go through the proper NPDES or state
authorities if they wish to get further information on specific volumes and concentrations.
His summarization - The wastewater effluents of the leather tanning industry contain very little
toxic pollutants. There are very few facilities in the industry that use land-based units.
-------
11-2-3
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
Seton Company, Leather Division
Pennsylvania
10/5/94 - 12/6/94
Carl Zipfel
(610) 666-9600
Manisha Shahane
FAX: (610) 666-1088
10/6/94 The initial call was made to Mark Taylor at (814) 635-2937 (the contact name
provided by the BRS). He directed the call to Carl Zipfel.
Contact was never made with Mr. Zipfel.
-------
11-2-4
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
Wolverine World Wide Inc.
Michigan
10/5/94 - 12/6/94
Steve Lyons
Harold Bailey, Manager of Environmental Affairs
(616)866-5500
Manisha Shahane
FAX: (616) 866-0992
10/5/94 Steve Lyons asked for a written information request before he could respond to
any of our requests. Information was faxed to him on 10/5/94.
12/6/94 Harold Bailey from the Department of Environmental Affairs called back. He said
that Wolverine World Wide is a small quantity generator. He made the following
points:
Some solvents are in the wastes.
Liquid wastes are sent to incineration.
He requested for some background information. A meeting was set up to talk at
3:00 pm later that afternoon after he had a chance to look over the fax, but he .
was not available at that time. No further contact has been made.
-------
11-2-5
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
Worth, Inc.
Tennessee
10/6/94 - 12/6/94
Bob Holder
(615) 455-2288
Manisha Shahane
12/6/94 Initial contact was made. Mr. Holder said that he would prefer to write and hoped
to get it to us that week. No further contact has been made with the company.
-------
11-2-6
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: U.S. Department of Commerce, Consumer Goods and Services
DATE: 10/6/94
CONTACT NAME: James Byron
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (202)482-4034
ICF CONTACT NAME: Shailendra Reddy
Left several messages on his voicemail since September 20, He has not yet responded.
-------
CHAPTER 12
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR THE
METAL PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY INDUSTRY
12.1 INTRODUCTION
This analysis of required treatment capacity, for the metal products and machinery
(MP&M) industry was developed to support today's proposed rule. The following sections are
presented: summary of findings (Section 12.2); background on the MP&M industry (Section
12.3); waste types potentially subject to today's proposed rule (Section 12.4); available data on
wastes generated and managed at MP&M facilities (Section 12.5); and an analysis of required
treatment capacity for the MP&M industry (Section 12.6).
12.2 SUMMARY
MP&M includes facilities that generate wastewater while processing metal parts, metal
products, and machinery, including manufacture and assembly operations, rebuilding, repair, and
maintenance operations. A summary of the estimated impact of today's proposed rule is
presented in Exhibit 12-1.
EXHIBIT 12-1
MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE METAL PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY INDUSTRY
Discharge
Mode
Direct
Indirect
Zero
Total
Number of
Facilities
3,060
21,420
6,120
30,600
Total Wastewaters
Mixed With ICRT
Wastes (million
tons/yr)*
2380
170
50
2,600
Facilities
Without
RCRA-
equivalent
Treatment*
130
940
270
1,340
Facilities
with Land-
based
Units"
460
210
€0
730
Affected
Facilities8
Oto20
Oto9
Oto3
Oto32
Affected
Wastewater
(million
tons/yr)a
0 to 15.56
0 to 0.07
0 to 0.02
0 to 15.65
a The quantities in this column were determined on an aggregated basis and apportioned to the direct, indirect, and
zero dischargers based on the percentage of each discharge mode.
Due to the.size of this category and based on differences/similarities between the groups
within this category, the facilities in the' category have been divided into two groups: MP&M
Effluent Guidelines Phase I and Phase H. The MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I group
includes seven industrial categories: aircraft, aerospace vehicles, hardware, ordnance, stationery
industrial equipment, mobile industrial equipment, and electronic equipment The MP&M
Effluent Guidelines Phase n group includes eight industrial categories: motor vehicles, bus and
-------
12-2
truck, railroad, ships and boats, office machines, household equipment, instruments, and precious
and nonprecious metals.
There are 10,600 facilities in MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and 20,000 facilities in
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase II that are regulated under the CWA. Available data for
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I facilities were reviewed to identify the impact of today's
proposed rule. These results were then extrapolated to include the MP&M Effluent Guidelines
Phase II facilities. For estimating the maximum number of affected facilities, EPA assumed that
all facilities in this category that have wastewater flows greater than 100,000 gallons per day use
land-based units and only a portion of the facilities with flows less than 100,000 gallons per day
use land-based units. The maximum number of facilities and wastewater volume that may be
affected by today's proposed rule were then estimated by identifying characteristic wastewaters
with end-of-pipe pollutant concentrations above UTS. All the pollutants found to exceed UTS
levels were priority pollutants. Other assumptions used in this analysis are detailed in Section
12.6.
Using the data and assumptions outlined above, EPA developed estimates for affected
MP&M facilities. Approximately 3,060 facilities are direct dischargers, 21,420 facilities are
indirect dischargers, and 6,120 facilities are zero discargers. EPA estimates that 730 facilities use
land-based units. In addition, approximately 1,340 facilities have constituents in their wastewaters
that are above UTS. EPA estimates that 0 to 32 facilities and 0 to 15.65 million tons of
wastewater per year will be impacted by today's proposed rule. However, EPA is currently
developing revised effluent limitations guidelines for the MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I
facilities and expects to finalize the rule in June 1996. EPA expects to finalize the rule for
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase II facilities in 1997. If the upcoming rule on revised effluent
limitations guidelines addresses all pollutants that exceed their UTS, then this category may not
be significantly affected by today's proposed rule.
12 3 BACKGROUND1
The metal products and machinery (MP&M) industry (formerly the Machinery
Manufacturing and Rebuilding Industry) is engaged in the manufacturing of a variety of products
that are constructed primarily by using metals. The MP&M facilities manufacture, rebuild, or
maintain machinery, including transportation, office machines, electronic and electrical equipment
1 Most of this section is summarized from, the data collected for the effluent limitations program (see
Section 12.5.4) and U.S. EPA, 1987 (October 19), Estimates of Waste Generation by the Fabricated Metal
Products Industry (SIC 34), the Industry and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment Industry (SIC
35), the Electronic and Other Electrical Equipment and Components Industry (SIC 36), and the
Transportation Equipment Industry (SIC 37, except 371), Draft Report, Office of Solid Waste, prepared by
Midwest Research Institute (MRI). It is important to note that the processes and data may have changed
since the writing of the document.
-------
. 12-3
•
and machinery, laboratory and medical instruments, household appliances, and industrial tools and
equipment. The MP&M industry includes the following SIC codes:
• SIC Code 34. Fabricated Metal Products, Except Machinery and Transportation
Equipment: This SIC code includes establishments engaged in fabricating ferrous
and nonferrous metal products, such as metal cans, tinware, hand tools, cutlery,
general hardware, nonelectric heating apparatus, fabricated structural metal
products, metal forgings, metal stampings, ordnance (except vehicles and guided
missiles), and a variety of metal and wire products, riot elsewhere classified.
• SIC Code 35. Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment:2
This SIC code includes establishments engaged in manufacturing machinery and
equipment, other than electrical equipment (SIC code 36) and transportation
equipment (SIC code 37). Machines powered by built-in or detachable motors
ordinarily are included in this SIC code, with the exception of electrical household
appliances (SIC code 36). Portable tools, both electric and pneumatic powered,
are included in this SIC code, but hand .tools are classified in SIC code 34.
• SIC Code 36. Electronic and Other Electrical Equipment and Components,
Except Computer Equipment:3 This SIC code includes establishments engaged in
manufacturing machinery, apparatus, and supplies for the generation, storage,
transmission, transformation, and utilizatiotuof electrical energy. The manufacture
of household appliances is included in this group, but industrial machinery and
equipment powered by built-in or detachable electric motors is classified in SIC
code 35.
• SIC Code 37. Transportation Equipment: This SIC code includes establishments
engaged in manufacturing equipment for transportation of passengers and cargo by
land, air, and water. Important products produced by establishments classified in
. this SIC code include motor vehicles, aircraft, guided missiles and space vehicles,
ships, boats, railroad equipment, and miscellaneous transportation equipment, such
as motorcycles, bicycles, and snowmobiles.
Approximately 70 percent of the facilities in the MP&M industry are associated with
transportation and office machines. An estimated 67 percent of the facilities have less than 10
2 Note that for today's proposed rule capacity analysis, SIC codes 3571 to 3579 for computer and
other electronic office equipment are covered separately under Chapter 5 for "Electrical and Electronic
Components." ..
3 Note that for today's proposed rule capacity analysis, this group of industries (SIC code 36) is
covered separately under Chapter 5 for "Electrical and Electronic Components."
-------
12-4
employees.4 The MP&M facilities operating in the United States as of October 1987 were
primarily located in California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas.5
The MP&M industry includes 15 industrial groups. Due to the size of this category and
based on differences/similarities between .the groups within this category, the facilities in the
category.have been divided into two groups for the purposes of the effluent guidelines program:
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and Phase II. The specific industries included under the
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and Phase II groups are given in Exhibit 12-2.
EXHIBIT 12-2
SPECIFIC INDUSTRIES INCLUDED IN THE MP&M EFFLUENT GUIDELINES
PHASE I AND PHASE II GROUPS
Phase I
Aircraft
Aerospace Vehicles
Hardware (Machine Tools, Screw Machines, etc.)
_Qrdnance .. . __ .
Stationary-Industrial -Equipment (including
Electrical Equipment)
. Mobile Jndustrial.. Equipment
Electronic Equipment (including Communications
Equipment)
Phase II
Motor Vehicles (i.e., Automobiles)
Bus and Truck
Railroad
Ships and Boats . ,
7Office Machines
Household Equipment :
Instruments (Measurement and Control
Instruments and Specialty Equipment)
Precious and Nonprecious Metals
Though the MP&M industry includes 970,000 facilities, most of these facilities do not
include any operations that generate wastewaters. The facilities regulated under the CWA only
includes 10,600 facilities in the MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I group and 20,000 facilities in
the MP&M-Effluent Guidelines Phase n group. Hence, only these facilities were analyzed for
the effect of today's proposed rule.
4 U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), Preliminary Data Summary for the Machinery Manufacturing and
Rebuilding Industry, Office of Water, Document No. 440/1-89/106. it is important to note that the
processes and data may have changed since, the writing of the document
U.S. EPA, 1987 (October 19), op. cit
-------
12-5
The standard manufacturing processes for the MP&M industry can be organized into two
groups: complex product and simple product. A schematic of the standard manufacturing
processes characteristic to these two groups is shown in Exhibit 12-3..
The MP&M facilities vary greatly in size, age, number of employees, and number and type
of operations performed. They range from very small job shops with less than 10 employees to
large facilities employing thousands of production workers. Because of the differences in sizes
and processes, production facilities are custom-tailored to the specific needs of each individual
plant. The possible variations of unit operations within the industry are extensive. The unit
operation types (and their sequence) presented in Exhibit 12-3 are not actual plants but are
representative of possible unit operation combinations within the MP&M category. Some
complex products could require the use of nearly all 46 unit operation types, while a simple
product might require only a single operation.
Many different raw materials are used by the MP&M facilities. Basis materials are almost
exclusively metals, that range from common .copper and steel to extremely expensive high grade
alloys and precious metals. The solutions utilized in the various unit operations can contain
acids, bases, cyanides, metals, complexing agents, organic additives, oils, and detergents. All of
these raw materials can potentially enter wastewater streams during the production sequence.
12.4 WASTE TYPES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY TODAY'S RULE
. The-waslewalexs-generated by the MP&M industry contain several organic and metal
pollutants. The wastewater characteristics and pollutant loadings vary with the manufacturing
operations_generating Jhe wastewaters. The specific unit operations usually begin with materials
in the form of raw stock (rods, bars, sheet" castings, forgings, etc.) arid "can progress to the most
sophisticated surface finishing operations. The various-unit operation types conducted in the
MP&M facilities and their standard^vater usage are given in Exhibit 12-4.
— EPA estimates that 10 percent of the MP&M facilities are direct dischargers, 70 percent
are. :inditect_d!schargers, and 20 percent are zero dischargers.6 _
"The MP&M~facilitiesprimarily use water in operations for surface treatment and rinsing
of work pieces and parts, cooling and lubrication, quenching, spray booths, testing, equipment
washing, and other miscellaneous applications. The specific wastewater treatment processes
typically used by the direct and indirect dischargers are summarized in Exhibit 12-5.
The MP&M category has been included under the effluent guidelines program because
many of the facilities identified in the "category use processes that generate large quantities of
U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. cit
-------
EXHIBIT 12-3
STANDARD UNIT OPERATIONS IN THE METALS PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY INDUSTRY
OMtflt flCOCT
M Shtat InMct rcMwra
Stock * DtfooMtlon OtfocMtlon
HfraaauraI
OttoCTitlon Y
l-GEEH
cu-niwi "ti-in>
H
EH
H
S. H •- H — h
Hachtnlng U-
Clcanlng
I
VMt
I— Calibrate L»-
•H fainting I
K)
8IKUHPPUCT
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (October 19), op. cit.
-------
12-7
EXHIBIT 12-4
UNIT OPERATION TYPES IN MP&M FACILITIES8
Unit Operation Type
Electroplating
Electroless Plating
Anodizing
Conversion Coating
Etching (Chemical Milling)
Cleaning
Machining
Grinding
Polishing
Tumbling (Barrel Finishing)
Burnishing
Impact Deformation
Pressure Deformation
Shearing ;
Heat Treating
Thermal Cutting
Welding
Brazing •.-•••?
Soldering
Flame Spraying
Sand Blasting
Other Abrasive Jet Machining
Elec. Discharge Machining
Electrochemical Machining
Electron Beam Machining
Laser Beam Machining
Plasma Arc Machining
Ultrasonic Machining
Sintering
Laminating
Hot "Dip Coating
Major Water
Usage
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
.-- «. J£_ .-^1~..-^.
X
Minimal Water
Usage
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
.
X
X
Zero Discharge
X
X
X
X
X
-------
12-8
EXHIBIT 12-4
UNIT OPERATION TYPES IN MP&M FACILITIES0 (continued)
Unit Operation Type
Sputtering
Vapor Plating
• Thermal Infusion
Salt Bath Descaling
Solvent Degreasing
Paint Stripping
Painting
Electrostatic Painting
Electropainting ......
Vacuum Metalizing
Assembly
Calibration
Testing --.--— - -.- — -
Mechanical Plating --• - —
Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing
Major Water
Usage
X
X
X -,
X
X
X
X
X
Minimal Water
Usage
-
X
.
X
Zero Discharge
X
X
X
X
X
-
U.S, EPAa9814Q.ctQbex 19),__<&_
corrosive wastewaters. These wastewaters include both acidic and alkaline streams and include
both concentrated solutions (i.e., process baths) and rinsewaters. Common practice in the MP&M
industry is to collect acidic wastewaters-in one tank and alkaline wastewaters in a separate tank.
The wastewaters are then used for pH adjustments and to precipitate metals. Most wastewaters
appear to be in tanks rather than in land-based units, (i.e., surface impoundments).7 Exhibit 12-6
presents a schematic of a typical wastewater treatment train at MP&M facilities.. The following
sections address these wastes in more detail, including the degree to which they may ultimately be
affected by tbdayTproposed rule.
12.5 AVAILABLE DATA
Several data sources were used for obtaining information on the generation and
management of the wastes by the MP&M industry. A description of the data sources is given in
Chapter 3 of the main text of the background document. The applicable information obtained
from these data sources is provided in the sections below.
U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. cit.
-------
12-9
12.5.1 Effluent Guidelines Development Document
The data summary for the Machinery Manufacturing arid Rebuilding Industry8 was
developed by EPA for deciding whether to develop national effluent limitations guidelines and
standards for these facilities. The report covered the 970,000 MP&M facilities that were
operating at the time of the compilation of the information. The report estimated that 10 percent
EXHIBIT 12-5
COMMON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES IN MP&M FACILITIES3
Treatment
Oil Separation
pH Adjustment
Chemical Precipitation
Sedimentation
Flocculation
Cr. Reduction
Multimedia Filtration Following
Lime and Settling
Dissolved Air Flotation
Emulsion Breaking
Cyanide Destruction
* : " 1 : :
Chlorination
Activated Carbon
Equalization
Ultrafiltration
Deep Well Injection
. Biological Oxidation
Percent of Total
Dischargers Using
Treatment
52
35
35
19
19
16
3
11
11
8
8
6
6
4
3
3
Percent of Direct
Dischargers Using
Treatment
33
67
44
78
11
33
11
0
11
11
11
22
11
0
11
11
Percent of Indirect
Dischargers Using
Treatment
55
30
33
11
20
14
2
12
11
8
8
3
5
'5
2
2
a U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. tit.
of the MP&M facilities are direct dischargers, 70 percent are indirect dischargers, and 20 percent
are zero dischargers. This document characterized the wastewaters for the priority pollutants, but
it did not present any data on non-priority pollutants.
U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. tit.
-------
EXHIBIT 12-6
i •;''•'' j •':•
TYPICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AT METAL PRODUCT AND MACHINERY FACILITIES
Raw Haate Dladuuge
(Treatavnt Syatea
Influent)
Hut* Treatmt
(If
Oily Haete
•taovai
Treated
Bf Clumt
qptloml
• I. I
Nanufaeturlng Pacillty
Raw HasU fiourctt
Toxic
Organioa
Reduction
Ociimn
HtUU
Cyanide
Destruction
Nithout
Conplcied
Hetale
Removal
RawKute
Haul*}
Matala""]
RemovalJ
final
Treated
ICCluent
Precioue
Hetal*
Recovery
Hauled Or
Reclaiawl
Hauled Or
Reclaiawl
Preatad
Effluent
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (October 19), op. cii.
-------
12-11
The unit operations in the MP&M industry generate wastewaters with high concentrations
of organics and metals. Exhibit 12-7 presents the maximum concentrations of several underlying
hazardous constituents in the wastewaters that may be managed in land-based units are above the
UTS levels set by the Phase II LDRs. However, these concentrations are at the points of
generation, and the effluent concentrations are typically much lower due to dilution and
wastewater treatment. The total reported wastewater flow for the MP&M industry was 630
billion gallons per year (2,620 million tons per year). The data, however, were not sufficient to
identify specific facilities and specific wastewater volumes that may be affected by today's
proposed rule.
EXHIBIT 12-7
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF SELECTED POLLUTANTS IN RAW WASTEWATERS8
—
Chemical Constituent
. Chlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Pichlproethene
Ethylhenzene. __ _.. .
Methytene Chloride
Naphthalene- — '•-!•
-Pentachtorophenol
Pnenor
Phenantfifehe
Toluene 7 ~
Beryllium
Chromium
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
UTS Level (mg/1)
0.057
0.054
0.025
' . . 0.057
0089
0.059
0.089
0.039
0.059
0.08
0182
2.77"
0.69
3.98
2.61
Maximum
. Concentration (mg/1)
21
174
15
71
4271
13
145 . ._
392
..__.. 33 .. .
9
15,000
" ' ~ ' 19)40o
3,500
39,000
45,000
U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. cit.
-------
12-12
12.5.2 POTW Report to Congress (RTC)
EPA has reviewed the RTC and did not find any applicable information for this analysis.
12.5.3 Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
Data from the 1991 BRS were extracted to determine what types of affected wastes are
generated by the petroleum refining industry. EPA obtained data for the top 25 waste generators
who treat ICRT wastes on site. (See Attachment 12-1.) A few facilities were selected for follow-
up on their BRS data submissions. This information is discussed in Section 12.5.8.
12.5.4 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
EPA has reviewed the TRI and did not find any applicable information for this analysis.
12.5.5 Permit Compliance System (PCS)
EPA found that approximately 50 of the 328 MP&M direct dischargers providing
information on their treatment types in the PCS used one of the treatment types that indicated
the potential use of a land-based unit. Many sites did not report their treatment type in the PCS
and not all potentially affected facilities are included in the database. Also, some of these sites
may not generate wastes affected by today's proposed rule. These factors lead to uncertainty in
the use of these data; however, this information provides perhaps an order of magnitude range for
the number of MP&M facilities that EPA can expect to use land placement
12.5.6 Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey
EPA has reviewed the Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey and did not find any
applicable information for this analysis.
12.5.7 Industry Studies Database (ISDB)
EPA has reviewed the ISDB and did not find any applicable information for .thus analysis.
12.5.8 Industry Contacts
, In order to better understand the generation and management of wastewaters at MP&M
facilities, EPA contacted facilities to follow-up on their BRS data submissions. This follow-up
information indicated that several pollutants found in wastewaters may not be addressed by the
NPDES or POTW permits. Most of the facilities have not analyzed for the underlying hazardous
constituents in their wastewaters. The information obtained is summarized in Exhibit 12-8
(detailed information obtained from the facilities is provided in the form of telephone logs in
Attachment 12-2). .
12.5.9 Comments to Previous Rules
EPA reviewed industry comments on related rules, such as the Phase II Rule, the
Emergency Rule, and the Notice of Data Availability for information regarding the management
-------
12-13
EXHIBIT 12-9
SUMMARY OF BRS FOLLOW-UP CONTACTS
Company Name
Buckbee-Mears,
Cortland
Monsanto Company
National
Semiconductor
Corporation
U.S. Steel Corp.,
Fairless Works
ICRT
Wastes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Land-
Based
Units
Yes
No
No
No
Constituent
Concentrations
above UTS
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Quantity
Discharged
524,200
tons/year
Not
Available
374,000
gallons/day
856,750.3
tons/year
Direct
Discharger
No
Yes
No
Yes
Indirect
Discharger
Yes
No
Yes
No
Zero
Discharger
No
No
No
No
of wastes at MP&M facilities. However, EPA did not find any data that would support this
analysis.
12.5.10 TCRIA
The TC R1A report9 presents estimates of waste generation by the MP&M industry. .
This document is part of a series of background documents for the rule on toxicity characteristic
wastes. This report only characterized 110,500 establishments that were operating in 1984. The
report estimated that the MP&M industry generates approximately 9,570 million tons of
wastewater per year. Exhibit 12-9 presents waste characterization data for wastewaters prior to
end-of-pipe treatment This exhibit indicates that several constituents exceed the UTS levels set
by the Phase II LDRs. The data, however, were not sufficient to identify specific facilities and
specific wastewater volumes that may be affected by today's proposed rule.
12.5.11 Data Collected for the Effluent Limitations Program
In order to better characterize the MP&M industry and its wastewaters for the effluent
guidelines limitations, EPA has conducted several data collection efforts. Section 12.6 presents an
analysis of the data presented below and Attachment 12-3 presents the results of the analysis.
These data collection efforts are briefly described below:
Questionnaires , -
To determine the universe of facilities included in the MP&M category for the effluent
guidelines program, EPA began with Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) information. Based on SIC codes,
US. EPA* 1987 (October 19), op. cit.
-------
12-14
EXHIBIT 12-9 '
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS IN COMBINED WASTEWATERS PRIOR TO
END-OF-PIPE TREATMENT
Constituent
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride'
Chlorobenzem,
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane*
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Chloroform* .- • - -
2,4-Dichlorophenol'
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Ethyl benzene'
Methylene chloride*
Bromoform
Chlorodibromomethane
Isophorone
Nitrobenzene
' N-Nitrosodiphenylamine*
Pentachlorophenol*
Phenol*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate*
UTS
(mg/1)
0.14
0.057
0.057
0.054
0.054
0.057
0.033
0.035
0.046
0.044
0.087
0.057
0.089
0.63
0.057
-
0.068
0.40
0.089
0.039
0.28
Maximum
Level
(mg/1)
0.029
0.097
0.011
12.0
0.01
0.006
0.01
0.03
0.685
0.068
0.012
0.113
8.4
0.001
0.002
0.03
0.01
0.78
. 50.0
6.55
2.9
Constituent
Di-n-butyl phthalate*
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tetrachloroethylene*
Toluene'
Trichlorethylene*
Chlordane'
Endrin*
Heptachlor
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium*
Chromium'
Cyanide*
Lead*
Mercury*
Nickel*
Selenium
Silver*
Barium*
UTS
(mg/1)
. 0.057
0.059
0.061
0.056
0.08
0.054
0.0033
0.0028
0.0012.
1.9
1.4
0.82
0.69
2.77
1.2
0.69
0.15
3.98
0.82
0.43
1.2
Maximum
Level (mg/1)
3.1
0.01
0.01
0.255
0.277
4.8
0.013
0.006
0.00008
0.5
0.158
0.11
21.6
601.8
805: 1'
23.8
0.358
789
0.06
22.12
19.73
U.S. EPA, 1987 (October 19), op. cit
Concentration exceeds UTS.
-------
12-15
EPA estimated that there were 970,000 facilities in the MP&M category. Through further
analysis, it was determined that 270,000 facilities were in the MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I
group and 700,000 facilities were in the MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase II group.
A two-page facility "screener" questionnaire was sent to 8,000 statistically-selected
facilities, including all facilities identified in MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and
manufacturing facilities in MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase II. The overlap of phases during
the screener mailing is because MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and Phase II were still being
defined at that time. The focus of the screener questionnaire was to identify the industrial group
of the facility, the unit operations at the facility, and the processes that involve or use water.
Over 47 different unit operation types that potentially include water rinses were identified by
EPA based on the screener responses. It was also determined from screener responses that the
number of facilities in MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I was significantly smaller than that
estimated by D&B. Screener responses indicated that less than half of the original 270,000
facilities performed the identified operations on metals (i.e., many were wood, warehouse, or non-
manufacturing operations) and that less than half of the remaining operations used water. As a
result, the estimate of the number of facilities in MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I was reduced
from 270,000 to 10,600 facilities. Assuming that the wastewaters generated by the MP&M
Effluent Guidelines Phase II facilities are similar to those generated by the MP&M Effluent
Guidelines Phase I facilities, EPA adjusted the number of facilities in the MP&M Effluent
Guidelines Phase II group from 700,000 to 20,000.
A detailed questionnaire was then sent to 1,000 statistically.identified MP&M Effluent
Guidelines Phase I facilities that responded to the screener questionnaire. The 65-page detailed
questionnaire was sent in January 1991 for the calendar year 1989 information. The purpose of
the questionnaire was to gather specific data and information on the unit operations and
treatment trains, wastewater generation and flow rates, and contaminants in the waste streams.
Of the 1,000 questionnaires sent, 800 facilities provided complete responses. Additional
information was received regarding flow rates and process diagrams; limited information was
received on contaminants in the wastewaters.
The data collected from the 800 facilities in the detailed questionnaire are maintained in
the Data Collection Portfolio (DCP) Database on the EPA mainframe. However, the process
and treatment train flow diagrams are not contained in the database. Codes (e.g., similar to the
code system used in the BRS) were assigned to questionnaire responses so the database can be
queried according to the individual categories on the questionnaire, the particular treatment
activity, or by other parameters.
Sampling Program
A sampling program was implemented during 1986-1993, with most data collected between
1991 and 1993, at 27 selected facilities. The facilities were selected to fill data holes or gaps in
industry sector or unit operations data received on the detailed questionnaires. As a result, the
-------
12-16
emphasis of the sampling program addressed the major unit operations and wastewater treatment
operations at these facilities.
The sampling criteria included metals (from Method 1620), organics (from Methods 1624
and 1625), and other conventional parameters (e.g., pH, TSS, and oil and grease). Originally, 300
constituents were analyzed in the samples; approximately 80 constituents of concern have been
identified based on certain criteria (these criteria are currently not considered to be in the public
domain). Samples were taken from concentrated solutions as close as possible in time to the
discharge time of the unit operation bath (e.g., some electroplating baths are discharged monthly,
others are discharged annually) for obtaining the highest contaminant levels. Samples were also
taken from rinsewaters during discharge, floor washes, and influent to the treatment system after
co-mingling of .waste streams.
Data were collected for the unit operations and treatment systems at these facilities and
have been incorporated into various files in the MP&M database. Despite their age, these data
are still considered to be representative of the MP&M industries, primarily because there is
typically very little change in this industry over time.
MP&M Database
Originally, the focus of the MP&M effluent guideline effort and the associated data
collection (the questionnaires and sampling data mentioned above) was to develop facility-specific
information. However, due to the size of the industry, statistically representative facilities were
identified and used for all regulatory efforts. A total of 446 facilities were selected to undergo a
modelling process and become representative of the entire MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I
group. The modelling process included use of actual questionnaire responses as the basis for the
model facility and use of the sampling and analysis data and site-visit information to fill in missing
information. As a result, each of the 446 facilities represents a portion of the industry. Scale-up
factors for each facility were then developed to allow the 446 facilities to be expanded to the
10,600 faculties identified in the MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I group. Of the 446 facilities,
50 have a scale-up factor of zero. These 446 model facilities are considered representative of the
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I group and were utilized in this capacity analysis.
12.6 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS
This section presents an estimate of the number of facilities and quantity of wastewater
affected by today's proposed rule. The average facility wastewater discharge in the MP&M
industry varies widely from 150 tons per year to 350 million tons per year. EPA used the
following assumptions to estimate the wastewater flows of direct, indirect, and zero discharges:
• Considering that 67 percent of the MP&M facilities have less than 10 employees
and that most of these facilities are indirect dischargers, EPA estimates that the
average wastewater flow for indirect dischargers is 100 times lower than that for
direct dischargers, which typically are facilities with large wastewater flows.
10
U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. cit
-------
12-17
Furthermore, EPA assumes that the MP&M zero dischargers typically have low .
wastewater flows, and estimates that the average wastewater flow for zero
dischargers is similar to that for indirect dischargers..
Extrapolating the information provided in the PCS, EPA estimates that approximately 460
facilities (or 15 percent) of the MP&M direct dischargers use land-based units. Extrapolating the
information provided in the PCS, EPA estimates that approximately 460 facilities (or 15 percent)
of the MP&M direct dischargers use land-based units. More than 67 percent of the MP&M
facilities are small (i.e., they have less than 10 employees11). Most of these facilities are small
job shops located in urban areas that either discharge their wastewaters to POTWs or are zero
dischargers. Considering that these facilities typically do not use land-based units, EPA estimates
that up to 210 and 60 facilities (or 1 percent each) of the MP&M indirect and zero dischargers,
respectively, use land-based units to manage or treat wastewaters.
The primary sources of data used in this analysis are the questionnaires, sampling data,
and the MP&M database that are mentioned in Section 12.5.4. The approach for identifying
facilities in the MP&M category that would likely be affected by today's proposed rule was
developed as a result of numerous discussions with the effluent guidelines development project
teams regarding the data that were collected and how they are currently managed in the
numerous files of the MP&M database. The discussions resulted in an approach consisting of a
series of queries and assumptions based on industry knowledge designed to define the affected
universe. The queries and assumptions utilized are described below and the detailed results of
the analysis are presented in Attachment 12-2:
Step 1: Query the database to identify facilities generating wastewaters that are corrosive
or contain a TC organic constituent Assumptions: Ignitable, reactive, or TC
pesticide wastewaters are not generated to a large extent by the MP&M industry.
All wastewaters that contain o.ne of the TC organic constituents at the point of
generation are considered TC organic wastewaters.
Step 2: For all facilities, compare all end-of-pipe constituents and their concentrations to
the UTS list.
Step 3: Identify all facilities that use land-based units and have end-of-pipe concentrations
above the UTS levels. Assumptions: All facilities with wastewater flows greater
than 100,000 gallons per day use land-based units. EPA used this conservative
assumption to capture the upper bound for affected facilities and wastewater
volumes. The detailed questionnaire asked for information regarding the
treatment performed but not for the unit in which the treatment is performed.
For facilities with wastewater flows less than 100,000 gallons per day, the list of
treatment codes in the DCP Dictionary was reviewed to identify the treatments
that would likely occur in a land-based unit
11 U.S. EPA, 1989 (October), op. tit.
-------
12-18
Step 4: Apply the industry scale-up factors for MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and
. Phase n groups. Assumption: The MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I and Phase
II groups generate similar wastewaters from similar processes.
Using the data and assumptions mentioned above, EPA found that several facilities have
pollutants at concentrations higher than the UTS levels. All of these pollutants were found to be
priority pollutants. EPA estimates that the maximum number of facilities that may be affected by
today's proposed rule are 32 MP&M facilities.
EPA lacks the data to differentiate which of the estimated 32 upper bound affected
MP&M facilities are direct, indirect, or zero dischargers. The distribution of the total number of
MP&M facilities between direct, indirect, and zero dischargers (i.e., 10, 70, and 20 percent,
respectively) cannot be used to differentiate the 32 affected facilities, since direct dischargers
typically generate larger volumes of wastewater and, consequently, have more land-based units
and will be more affected by today's proposed rule. Considering that the type of operations and
characteristics of generated wastewaters at all MP&M facilities are similar, EPA assumes that the
distribution between the direct, indirect, and zero dischargers for facilities affected by today's
proposed rule is the same as that for facilities with land-based units.
However, EPA is currently developing revised effluent limitations guidelines for the
MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase I facilities and expects to finalize the rule in June 1996. EPA
expects to finalize the rule for MP&M Effluent Guidelines Phase II facilities in 1997. If the
upcoming rule on revised effluent limitations guidelines addresses all pollutants that exceed their
UTS, then this category may not be affected by today's proposed rule.
-------
ATTACHMENT 12-1
BRS DATA
-------
SRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
.A t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 1
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
AZD009004961 HONEYWELL, INC. PHX
Source Code . : A22-Surface Prep and Finish
Fora Code B11?-lnorganic Liquid
Waste Description AQUEOUS WASTE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATION WITH LOU CU CONCENTRATION. ,
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
999 3812 1-On-site activity 1-Before nix
386,457.6 2-No
1-No TRI Report
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/386,457.6
D002
PS Page System
1 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Sec.III-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
473,782.2 / 386,457.6
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1,205,463.6 / 1,205,463.6 400,471.8 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
678.7 / 678.7
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ELEMENTARY WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM
Comment :
AZ0091235457 INTEL CORP PHX CAMPUS
CHANDLER
19 3674 1-0n-*ite activity 4-After mix of HW ft hon-HW
312,760.6 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
A02-Cleaning 4 DegreesIng
B104-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE SOLUTIONS TREATED ONSITE IN BLDG . F6 WASTEWATER NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM
07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • GN * PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 2
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for."Metals Products & Machinery" industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
onsite Info (System/Qty)
Jaste Codes
City
: M121 -Other Trttrt/312,760.6
: 0002
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement Generated
Radio-
active
AZD091235457 INTEL CORP PHX CAMPUS CHANDLER
Source Code : A22-Surface Prep and Finish
20 3674 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU t hon-HU
83.402.8 2-No
Fora Code
Waste Description
8103-Inorganic Liquid
RINSEUATERS C SPENT BATHS (F.ELECTROPLATING) HAVING HAZ. HASTE CHARACTERISTICS;TREATED IN BLDG. CH4 WASTEWATER PRE-
TREATMENT SYSTEM
Comments
CAS Numbers
rRI Constituent
: 07664-93-9
: 3-TRI ConstitUent(s)
onsite Info (System/Qty) : M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/B3,402.8
Jaste Codes : D002
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 667.2 / 667.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
667.2 / 667.2
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU .
Operational Status : 01 -Operational
Unit Type : 01 -Tank
Description : PRECIPITATION OF CALCIUM FLOURIDE F/WASTEUATERS CONTAINING HYDROFLUORIC ACID USING LIME
Comment :
M121 -Other Trtmt 312,760.6 / 312,760.6
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
312,760.6 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : BLDG F6 UASTEUATER NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM
Residual (Total/RCRA)
1,000.0 / 1,000.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BUS yi uversib- • un a ra rorms ins 01 I i/»m
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 3
File : 1ND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products ft Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
CotiiMnt
3 M077-Aqueous
Sec.III-A.
City
• ' v , •
Inorganic Trtmt 83,402.8 / 83.402.8
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
CM ' Origin ' 1991 Tons Radio-
Page SIC _ Code Point of Measurement Generated active
166,805.7 / 166,805.7 63,402.8 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
48.9 / 48.9
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : METALS PRECIPITATION ft PH ADJUST OF WASTEWATERS ASSOCIATED W/ELECTROPLATING
Comment :
4 M078-Aqueous Inorganic Trtnt 41.7/41.7 0.0/0.0 41.7/41.7 0.8/0.8
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N . 0.0/0.0 1900 •
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU ,
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank •
Description : TREATMENT OF ARSENIC CONTAMINATED WASTE WATER I AN ION EXCH-ANGE UNIT
Comment :
CAD008324949 TRW ELECTRONIC ft DEFENSE MANHATTAN BEACH 37 3679 i-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW 15,732.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comnents
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surface Prep.and Finish '
8103-lnorganic Liquid
CHELATED METALS AND HEAVY METAL BEARING WASTE LIQUID FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/15,732.0
0002 D006
CAD008324949 TRW ELECTRONIC ft DEFENSE MANHATTAN BEACH > 38 3679 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW 252,816.8 2-No
Source Code : A22-Surface Prep.and Finish
-------
iRS 91 Oversight
>ATE : 11/15/94
He : IN08RUN1.RPT
CM t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 4
BRS Data-for "Hotels Products ft Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
.acility
lO
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
>: ore Code
faste Description
ioments
C.KS Numbers
fRI Constituent
Jnsite Info (System/Qty)
,/aste Codes
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
ACID LIQUID WASTE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtnt/252,816.8
0002
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
System .
H121 -Other Trtrot 252,816.8/252,816.8 900,750.6/900,750.6 252,816.8/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
48
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEUTRALIZATION OF CORROSIVE (NON-METAL BEARING) WASTEWATERS IN TANK SYSTEM
Comment • • . ' t
M077rAqueous Inorganic Trtmt 15,732.0/15,732.0 75,062.6/75.062.6 15|727.6 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
4.4 / 4.4
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational ' -
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : METAL BEARING WASTE TREATED BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION
Cooment : .
CAD041472986 NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP SANTA CLARA
source Code : A22-Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code , : B103-Inorganic Liquid
15 3417 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
413.7 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight «iM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 5
File : IN08RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products ft Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
: CORROSIVE WASTE CONTAINING METALS TREATED IN A BATCH TREATMENT SYSTEM
Waste Description
Comments : '
CAS Numbers : 07440-50-8 07664-93-9
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/413.7
Waste Codes : 0002
CAD041472986 NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
SANTA CLARA
16 3417 1-On-slte activity 1-Before mix
Source.Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A04-Cleaning ft Degreasing
BIOS-Inorganic liquid
NON CYANIDE WASTEWATER CONTAINING HEAVY METALS FROM PLATING OPERATIONS TREATED IN A CONTINUOUS PROCESS
07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/72,280.0
0002 : - ,
72,280.0 2-No
CAD041472986 NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
SANTA CLARA
18 3674 1-On-slte activity 1-Before mix
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent'
!
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A04-Cleaning ft Degreasing
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
ACIDIC WASTE WATER FROM SEMICONDUCTOR FABRICATION PROCESS
. ' •' - .1
07647-01-0 07664-39-3 07664-93-9 07697-37-2
3-TRI ConstItuent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/1.452,085.1 ; ,
D002
1,452,085.1 2-No
-------
3 91 Oversight • CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
rE : 11/15/94 Page 6
te : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
cility Facility
Name
CM Origin ' 1991 Tons • Radio- •
City Page " SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Totat/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
10
11
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtart 413.7 / 413.7 792.3 / 792.3
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status :. 06-RCRA/POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : BATCH TREATMENT OF CORROSIVE UASTEUATER CONTAINING METALS
Comnent :
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtrot 513.2 / 513.2 792.3 / 792.3
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
413.7 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
41.0 / 0.0
513.2 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
37.4 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CYANIDE DESTRUCTION FOLLOWED BY METAL PRECIPITATION IN TANKS. PRECIPITATED METALS COLLECTED IN SLUDGE. (BATCH TREATMENT)
Coorocnt s . *
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 79,153.9 / 79,153.9
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
328,774.0 / 328,774.0 79,153.9 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
26.5 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW '
Operational status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CYANIDE WASTE TREATED IN CONTINUOUS FLOW SYSTEM; CYANIDE DESTRUCTION FOLLOWED BY METAL PRECIPITATION
Cooment :
_M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 72,280.0 / 72,280.0: 328,774.0 / 328,774.0 , 72,280.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 ~~
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW .
Operational Status : 01-Operational - •
Unit Type : 01-Tank
68.5 / 0.0.
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh. GM I PS Forms (As oM 1/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 7
File : IND8RUN1.RPT . ^
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
"•
13
Facility
Name
Description
Comment
M121 -Other Trtmt
Sec.lll-A. Neti
City
: HEAVY METAL PRECIPITATION (CONTINUOUS
1,452,085.1 / 0.0
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
GM
Page SIC
SYSTEM)
2,435,362.8 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1,452,085.1 / 0.0
1991 Tons
Generated
0.0 / 0.0
Radio-
active
X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW ' •
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ACID NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM (CONTINUOUS FLOW)
Comment : '
CAD070466479 SIGNETICS COMPANY SUNNYVALE 14 3674 1-On-slte activity 2-After mix of HW 403,867.3 2-Ho
Source Code : A31-Other'than Surface Prep and Finish
Forn Code : B119-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : CORROSIVE WASTEWATER FROM THE SEMICONDUCTORMANUFACTURING PROCESS..
Conments : *SEC. I, H; B119: ACIDIC AND CAUSTIC AQUEOUS WASTE. "SEC. II, SYSTEM 1: ACID AND CAUSTIC NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM. "*SEC.
IV, B, W19: SHUT DOWN PROCESS FAB.
CAS Numbers : < .
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent - ' .
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M078-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/403,867.3 ,
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page System ' Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
24~ MOTB-Aqueous Inorganic Trtrot 403,867!3 / 403,867.3 3,616,513.8/3,616,513.8 404,261.1/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper.' (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-Tank
NEUTRALIZATION OF A D002 WASTE COMING FROM SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING.
* SEC. I, B, M078: NEUTRALIZATION OF ACIDS AND BASES. SEC. II, A, C: THE TOTAL ttCRA WASTE THAT (S TREATED IN THIS SYSTEM
-------
. AS Numbers
HI Constituent
nsite Info (System/Qty)
/aste Codes
A03-Cleaning ft Degressing ' ' •
8106-Inorganic Liquid . .
SPENT CAUSTIC SOLUTION AND RINSE WATER FROM PLATING AND SURFACE PREPARATION TANKS: SOLUTION OF CAUSTIC SODA AND WATER Wl
TH METALS.
1-No TRI Report
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/141,667.3
D002
PS Page System
1
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 20,786.3 / 20,786.3
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
77,090.6 / 77,090.6 19,660.5 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA):
1,570.4 / 1,570.4
0.0 / 0.0
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversig.. CM 4 PS forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 9
File : IND8RUN1.RPT i
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City '.•'••
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : WASTE CYANIDE FOR CYANIDE DESTRUCTION FOLLOWED BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION.
Comment : SEC II. BOX F - THE SYSTEM CAN ONLY HANDLE INORGANIC WASTES. SEC II. BOX B - PERMIT LIMITATION ON MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL CA
PACITY.
2 H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtnt 15,013.3 / 15,013.3 1.850,174.9 / 1,850,174.9 (4,186.9 / 0.0 1,570.4 / 1,570.4
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900 .
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank .
Description : SPENT CHROME SOLUTION FOR CHROME REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION.
Comment : . • .
3 N077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtrat 355,300.3 / 355,300.3 1,595,650.5 / 1,595,650.5 155,143.1 / 0.0 1,570.4 / 1,570.4
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTU .
Operational Status : 01-Operational • • ,
Unit Type : 01-Tank ' . . .
Description : SPENT ACID AND CAUSTIC SOLUTION METAL BEARING WASTES FOR CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION,
Comment : •
CTD010170363 STANLEY HARDWARE . NEU BRITAIN 12 3471 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix 97,335.2 2-No /
Source Code : A22-Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code . : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : ACID RINSEWATERS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS - CORROSIVE
Comments : •
CAS Numbers : 07647-01-0 07664-93-9 07697-37-2
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/97,335.2
-------
,«S 91 Oversight - CM ( PS Forms (As of 11/94)
•ATE : 11/15/94 Page 10
He : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products ft Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
.acility
0
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated,
Radio-
.active
taste Codes
: 0002
TD010170363 STANLEY HARDWARE
NEW BRITAIN
13 3471 1-On-site activity 1-Before ml*
162,225.4 2-No
ource Code
,orn Code '
iaste Description
1 oonents
AS Nuflbers
Rl Constituent
nsite Info (System/Qty)
jste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish '
B110-Inorganic Liquid
ALKALINE RINSEWATERS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
CAS * B1310-73-2
•
3-TRI Constituent(s)
H077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/162,225.4
D002
PS Page System
.45 M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Sec.lII-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
36,437.2 / 36,437.2
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
219.182.7 / 219,182.7 36,437.2 / 36,437.2
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CYANIDE OXIDATION OF ELECTROPLATING WASTEWATER BY
Content : SEC. II. BOX B ft C: ARE REPORTED IN GALLONS/YEAR AND ARE
ALKALINE CHLORINATION
REPORTED AS AIR QUANTITY TREATED IN 1991 ON-SITE
46
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 64,890.1 / 64,890.1
Sec.lll-A. Neu Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
109,591.3 / 109,591.3 64,890.1 / 64,890.1
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHROMIUM REDUCTION OF CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING UASTEUATER
Comment : SEC. II, BOX B: REPORTED IN GALLONS PER YEAR.
47 M101-Sludge Trtmt
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
522.5 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 11
File : 1ND8RUN1.RPT '
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
"If,. ......
Facility Facility
ID Name City
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
N 0.0/0.0 . 1900'
CM Origin
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
-
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : DEWATERING OF METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE
Conment :
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational ,
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF ELECTROPLATING UASTEUATER .
Comment : .
IDD053798104 AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS. INC. POCATELLO
Source Code : A01-Cleaning I Degreasing
: B119-lnorgantc Liquid
3674 5-Residual
4-After nix of HU i hon-HU
465,933.6 2-No
Form Code
Waste Description
Comnents,
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
OnsIte Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
NEUTRALIZATION OF WASTEUATER FROM THE PROCESSING OF SILICON WAFERS AND ASSOCIATED EXHAUST AIR SCRUBBERS CONTAINING HF, H
CL. H3P04, H2S04, H202, NH4F, NH40H.
IF A02, A03, A05, A06 A27, A78 IH BIOS, B110, BUS SEC IK 07664-39-3
06484-52-2 07664-41-7 07664-93-9 07697-37-2 07783-20-2
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/465,933.6
D002 .
PS Page System
27
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M121-0ther Trtmt 465,933.6/0.0 1,310,444.6/0.0 462,605.5/0.0
Sec!lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
55.2 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE i 11/15/94 Page 12
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID.
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operatfonal .
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEUTRALIZATION OF UASTEUATER FROM THE PROCESSING OF SILICON WAFERS AND ASSOCIATED EXHAUST AIR SCRUBBERS CONTAINING. HF,
HCL, H3P04, H2S04, H202. NH4F, AND NH40H
Garment :
MAD000829986 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
HUDSON
22 3674 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of hW
310,196.0 2-No
Source Code
Forn Code
Waste Description
Connients
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A27-Surface Prep and Finish •
B104-Inorganic Liquid
CONCENTRATED INORGANIC SOLUTIONS AND RINSE WATERS FROM ETCHING AND STRIPPING OPERATIONS IN SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP MANUFACTU
RING, AND PROCESS EQUIPMENT PARTS CLEANING. INORGANIC WATE
SEC.1, F-A01, A-02, A31; SEC.I, H-B105, B110, 8115, SEC. II 0 -M077
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/310,196.0
D002
PS Page System
19 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
310,196.0 / 310.196.0
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
328,774.0 / 328,774.0
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
311,467.0 / 0.0
Sec.l!l-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
657,548.0 / 657.548.0
1992
1
Residual (Total/RCRA)
19.1 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operatfonal
Unit Type : : 01-Tank
Description : WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR TREATING RINSE WATERS FROM ETCHING STRIPPING AND CLEANING OPERATIONS IM SEMICONDUCTOR CHI
P MFGING. CALCIUM FLUORIDE SLUDGE GENERATED IS CLASSIFIED AS
Comment :
MID006015598 KEELER BRASS CO.
GRAND RAPIDS
8 3471 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
366,605.5 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversi
DATE : 11/15/9*
GN & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 13
File : INDBRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
. Cuciincots
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
: A22-surface Prep and Finish
: B107-lnorganlc Liquid
: RINSEWATERS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS.
: 07440-50-8 07440-66-6
: : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : N072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/366,605.5
Waste Codes : 0002 0003 0007
PS Page System
9 M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Sec.lll-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
366,605.5 / 366,605.5
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
876,730.6 / 876,730.6 366,605.5 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
149.7 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : WASTEUATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.
Comment :
1900
NYD002047967 GRUMMAN AERO!
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Garments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Ons ite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
iPACE CORPORATION BETHPAGE > . 3 3479 1-On-site activity 1 -Before mix 338,985.9 2-No
A29- Surf ace Prep and Finish . ,
BIOS- Inorganic Liquid
RINSEWATERS WITH ACIDIC WASTES FROM ELECTROPLATING AND METAL
SEC. 1.F-ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHING. SEC. 1.H-AQUEOU
-
3-TRI Const ituent(s) .
M071 -Aqueous Inorganic Trtrat/338,985.9 • .
D007 D002
-------
RS 91 Oversight
ATE : 11/15/94
• Me : IND8RUN1.RPT
CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 14
60
BRS Data for "Metals Products i Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility
0
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement Generated
Radio-
active
PS Page System
59 M085-Aqueous Organic Trtmt
Sec.llI-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
3,150.0 / 3,150.0
New Max. Oper, (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
45,990.0 / 45,990.0 3,150.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1935
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational ' •
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHEMICAL OXIDATION FO RINSEWATERS FOLLOWED BY CHROME REDUCTION AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITAION IN TANKS.
Coonent : SEC 1.B-CHEHICAL OXIDATION FOLLOWED BY CHROME REDUCTION AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION.
H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 339,652.6 / 339,652.6
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1.661,750.0 / 1,661,750.0 339,652.6 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1935
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW ;
Operational Status : 01-Operational ,
Unit Type '. 01-Tank ,
Description : CHROME REDUCT4CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF RINSEWATERS IN TANKS
Comment :
Residual (Total/RCRA)
7.4 / 0.0
787.5 / 0.0
.Y0010783967 BUCKBEE-MEARS CORTLAND
CORTLAND
3 3479 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
524,200.0 2-No
ource Code
ora Code
Jaste Description
laments
AS Numbers
iRI Constituent
\
msite Info (System/aty)
Jaste Codes .
A03-Cleaning t Degreesing N
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
PROCESS AND RINSE WASTEWATERS FROM PHOTOCHEMICAL ETCHING OPE
SEC. I, BOX F, CONT.:A02,A04,A06,A09,A29 (PHOTO RESIST-COATI
00107-21-1 07647-01-0 07697-37-2 07782-50-5
3-TRI Constituent^)
H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/524,200.0
D002 D007
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
-------
BRS 91 Overs19 GM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 15
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery*' Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
17'
Facility
Nairn
M071- Aqueous
Sec.llI-A.
Inorganic Trtrat
New Max. Oper.
602.300.0
(Total/RCRA)
City
/ 524.200.0
Year of Change
CM
Page
, 800,000.0
Future Avail
SIC
/ 700.
. Code
Origin
Code
000.0 602,
X Future Capacity
Point of Measurement
300.0 / 524,200.0
1991 Tons
Generated
1,911.0 / 1,911.0
Radio-
active
N 0.0/0.0 5535 0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW . -
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 01-Tank 10-Tank
Description : UASTEUATER TREATMENT FOR CHROME REDUCTION AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION FOR TREATING PROCESS AND RINSE UASTEUATER FROM PHOT
OCHENICAL ETCHING OPERATIONS.
Comment : SEC. I, BOX E: DRAINS/WASTE PIPING / SEC. II, BOX B: ESTIMATED
18 M121 -Other Trtrot 602,300.0/524,200.0 800,000.0/800,000.0 602,300.0/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.llI-A. NeM Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1935 0 '
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU .
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank .
Description : UASTEUATER PRETREATMENT PLANT FOR NEUTRALIZING PROCESS/RINSE UATERS FROM PHOTOCHEMICAL ETCHING OPERATIONS AND CITY UATER
TREATMENT UASTEUATER.
COflVDGTlt • ' • . •
19 M021-Solvents Recovery 3.6/3.6 90.0/90.0 i.6 / 0.0 1.0/1.0
* ' '
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change ,' Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity .
N 0.0 / 0.0 1935 0
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
. Unit Type : 01-Tank .
' Description : DISTILLATION UNIT TO RECOVER SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENT FROM PRODUCTION GLASS PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATE COATING.
Comnent : SEC. II, BOX A: ESTIMATED / SEC. II, BOX B: ESTIMATED /.SEC. II, BOX C: ESTIMATED / SEC. II, BOX 0: ESTIMATED
NYD080460215 OAK-MI TSUI HOOSICK FALLS 8 3497 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HU 489,716.7 2-No
Source Code : A31-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : PROCESS UASTE UATERS ENTERING UASTE TREATMENT UNIT,-CORROSIV
Conroents : UASTE UATER RINSES PROCESSED N SITE-CORROSIVE
-------
,45 91 Oversight • CM t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
ATE ! 11/15/94 Page 16
ile : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products t Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility
D
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
AS Numbers :
,RI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
nsite Info (System/Oty) : M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/489,716.7
aste Codes : 0002 0004
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 489,716.7/489,716.7 622,521.2/622,521.2 489,716.7/0.0
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
379.9 / 379.9
0.0 / 0.0
1935
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Conment
02-NPOES
01-Operational
01-Tank
CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF METALS, PH ADJUSTMENTS. METALS INCLUDE ARSENIC & COPPER
R0060591963 INTEL CORPORATION ALOHA CAMPUS ALOHA • . 13 3674 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HU 363,925.1 2-No
ource Code
orm Code
taste Description
oowents
AS Numbers
Rl Constituent
insite Info (System/Qty)
/aste Codes
A27- Surf ace Prep and Finish , •
8104- Inorganic Liquid •
ACID WASTE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM NEUTRALIZE CORROSIVE WASTE WATER PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO POTU
' . ' ' .' ' ' '.
a-Unknown
H121 -Other Trtmt/363,925.1 .
0002
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
1 M121 -Other Trtmt 363,925.1 / 363,925.1 459,191.0 / 459,191.0 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
-------
BRS 91 OversIgh CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 17
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Uastes
Facility Facility GH
ID • Name City Page
Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
N 0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status 03- POT W • :
Operational Status -01-Operatlonal
Unit Type 01 -Tank 02-Container
Description ACID WASTE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM- NEUTRALIZE CORROSIVE
Convncnt , .
ORD987166204 FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS. INC. GRESHAM 13
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Conments .
CAS Nunfcers
TRI Constituent
Ons ite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A02-Cleaning & Degrees ing
BIOS- Inorganic Liquid , . .
ACID WASTE WATER FOR SEMI-CONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING.
AND PHOSPHORIC ACIDS AND AMMONIA
8 -Unknown
MlZI-Other Trtmt/611,648.3
D002
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper
03- Incinerator 04-Klln, Furnacei or Boiler
WASTEWATER PRIOR Td DISCHARGE TO POTU
3674 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-HU 611,648.3 2-No
HAZARDOUS DUE TO CORROSlVITT COMPOSED OF SULFURIC, NITRIC
•
. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
1 M121 -Other Trtrot 611,648.3/29.126.1 611,648.3/29,126.1 0.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank 02-Container 03-Incinerator
Description : NEUTRALIZATION OF SPENT ACIDS BY PH ADJUSTMENT WITH CAUSTIC SODA
Conment :
04-Klln, Furnace, or Boiler
PAD002375376 U.S. STEEL CORPORATION FAIRLESS WORKS FA1RLESS HILLS
Source Code : A03-Cleanlng & Degreasing ;
3 3479 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
770,737.2 2-No
-------
RS 91 Oversight • GM 4 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
ATE : 11/15/94 Page 18
,ile : IH08RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
, acility Facility
o Name
arm Code
aste Description
oonents
AS Hunters
,RI Constituent
nsite Info (System/Ply)
aste Codes
AD002375376 U.S. STEEL
ource Code
i orn Code
aste Description
ooraents
AS Hunters
.Rl Constituent
nsite Info (System/Qty)
aste Codes
AD002375376 U.S. STEEL
ource Code
. orn Code
'aste Description
onments
AS Nunters
Rl Constituent
CM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
B1 10- Inorganic Liquid
SPENT CAUSTIC CLEANING SOLUTIONS AND RINSES GENERATED FROM CLEANING CARBON STEEL
2-No TRI Constituent
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/308,294.9 M124-0ther Trtmt/462,442.3
D002
CORPORATION FAIRLESS WORKS FAIRLESS HILLS - 4 3479 1-On-site activity 1 -Before mix 856,750.3 2-No
A02-Cleaning t Degrees ing ,
BIOS- Inorganic Liquid . .
SPENT ACID CLEAHIHG SOLUTIOHS AND RINSES GENERATED FROM CLEANING CARBON STEEL -
07439-92-1 07440-47-3 07440-66-6 07647-01-0 07664-93-9
3-TR1 Constituent(s)
H077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/856, 750.3 •
: 0002
CORPORATION FAIRLESS WORKS FAIRLESS HILLS 5 3479 1-On-site activity 1 -Before mix . 118,921.6 2-No
A29-Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
SPENT CHRONIC ACID SOLUTIONS AND RINSES GENERATED FROM TREATING CARBON STEEL
SEC 1, F : WASTE GENERATED FROM GALVANIZING AND TREATING CARBON STEEL
SEC 1, K : CAS #07439-92-0 WAS REJECTED BY THE COMPUTER ALTHOUGH SITE AND MSDS LISTINGS AGREE IT IS VALID
07439-92-1 07440-47-3 07440-66-6 .
3-TRI Constituent(s)
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
File : INDBRUN1.RPT
A & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 19
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/118,434.3
Waste Codes : D002 0007
PS Page
T
System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Ml24-0ther Trtmt 1,777,847.8 / 462,442.3 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
1,773,585.4 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational ' • . ( ' • .
Unit Type : 01-Tank • _ ' .
Description : NEUTRALIZATION AND PHASE SEPARATION OF OILY AND CAUSTIC (0002) UASTEWATERS FROM FINISHING AND CLEANING CARBON STEEL
Conment : SEC II, A&B : CAUSTIC UASTEWATERS ARE COMBINED AND DISCHARGED TO THE FINISHING MlLl TREATMENT PLANT. INDIVIDUAL WASTEWA
TER STREAMS MAY BE HAZARDOUS (0002). THE COMBINED STREAM IS NOT HAZARDOUS
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 1.165,045.2 / 1,165,045.2
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
1)161,226.2 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
3,619.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES ,
Operational Status : 01-Operational ' ,
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEUTRALIZATION AND PRECIPITATION OF ACID AND CAUSTIC (0002) WASTEWATERS GENERATED FROM CLEANING CARBON STEEL
Conment : SEC11, A&B : ACID. WASTEUATERS ARE COMBINED AND DISCHARGED TO THE FINISHING MILL UASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. INDIVIDUAL
WASTEWATER STREAMS MAY BE HAZARDOUS (0002). THE COMBINED STREAM IS NOT HAZARDOUS. K062 IS USED AS A WASTEWATER TREATME
NT CHEMICAL FOR EMULSION BREAKING PH CONTROL AND SLUDGE SEEDING AT THE FINISHING MILL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (SEE FO
RM CM, PAGE 1, SECTION II AND IV). K062 IS ADDED (1 GALLON/MINUTE) TO THE ACID UASTEWATER STREAM FOR THE ABOVE TASK AND
IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE INFLUENT QUALITY , .
H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 118,434.3 / 118,434.3
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
118,084.1 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
350.2 / 350.2
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES.
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHROMIUM REDUCTION OF CHROMIC WASTEWATERS (D007, 0002) GENERATED FROM COATING CARBON STEEL. TREATMENT ACCOMPLISHED BY R
EACTION WITH SULFUR DIOXIDE FOLLOWED BY CHEMICAL
Conment : SEC I. A CONTINUED : PRECIPITATION AND SLUDGE DEWATERING SEC II, A : CHROMIC WASTEWATERS ARE COMBINED AND DISCHARGED
TO THE FINISHING MILL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. THE INDIVIDUAL WASTEUATER STREAMS MAY BE HAZARDOUS. THE COMBINED STR
-------
JRS 91 Oversight
.)ATE : 11/15/94
file : IN08RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 20
BRS Data for "Hetals Products t Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
EAM IS USUALLY NOT HAZARDOUS. SULFUR DIOXIDE IS USED FOR CHROMIUM REDUCTION
.'AD005033055 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
ERIE
15 3743 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
297.114.0 2-No
source Code
Form Code
Jaste Description
Comnents
CAS Numbers
fRI Constituent
Jnsite Info (System/Qty)
iVaste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid '
ACIDIC WASTE WATER FROM ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHING OPERATIONS
SEC. IV. BOX 2-WASTE WATER .GENERATED RELATIVELY PROPORTIONALTO PRODUCTION VOLUME
1-No TRI Report
H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtrat/297,114.0
D002 '-
PAD005033055 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
ERIE
16 3743 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
38,781.0 2-No
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
comnents.
CAS Numbers.
TRI Constituent
OnsHe Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
B107-Inorganic Liquid
CYANIDE WASTE WATER FROM ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHING OPERATIONS
SEC. IV, BOX 2-WASTE WATER GENERATION RELATIVELY PROPORTIONAL TO PRODUCTION VOLUME
1-No TRI Report
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/38,781.0
D003
System
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Sec.lll-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
442.239.0 / 38,781.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,969,240.8 / 438.350.4 442,239.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
173.5 / 20.3
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
-------
BRS 91 Overs!gl. OH ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 21
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products ft Machinery11 Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility GN Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
ID Name City Page SIC . Code Point of Measurement Generated active
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CYANIDE BEARING WASTE WATER FROM HEAT TREATING AND ELECTROPLATING ARE TREATED flf ALKALINE CHLRINATIOM FOLLOWED Bf LIME
NEUTRALIZATION FOR METALS PRECIPITATION
Comment :
2 M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 442,239.0 / 297,114.0 1,969,240.8 / 1,530,890.4 442,239.0 / 0.0 175.5 / 155.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity •
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900 .
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES •
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ACIDIC WASTE WATERS ARE TREATED BY CHROMATE REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY NEUTRALIZATION WITH LIME FOR METALS PRECIPITAION
Comment : '/ .
PAD980554570 GTE PRODUCTS CORP. WARREN 7 3496 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW ft non-HU - 496,861.1 2-No
Source Code : A22-Surfa.ce Prep and Finish
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
WASTE ACID ft CORROSIVE CLEANING BATHS PLUS RINSE WATERS.
CAS 01310-73-2 ' .
07440-02-0 07440-50-8 07647-01-0 07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
N077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/496,861.1
D002 0008
PAD980554570 GTE PRODUCTS CORP. WARREN 10 3496 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW ft non-mi 23,035.9 2-No
Source Code : A31-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : Bl19-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : SPENT RINSE WATER FROM A PRECIOUS METAL ELECTROPLATING OPERATION.
Comnents : SEC. 1, F (8119) SOLUTION FROM A PRECIOUS METAL ELECTROPLATING OPERATION THAT CONTAINS CYANIDE.
-------
.)RS 91 Oversight
.)ATE : 11/15/94
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 22
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
CAS Numbers :
[Rl Constituent : 1-Ho TRI Report
onsite Info (System/Oty) : M073-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/23,035.9
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1 M073-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 23,228.1/192,2 104,253.5/104,253.5 23,228.1/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
Q.O / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CYANIDE DESTRUCTION FROM A PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY
Conroent :
PROCESS.
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 496.862.7 / 496,862.7 726,274.7 / 726,274.7 496,662.7 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
8S.S / 85.5
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : PH NEUTRALIZATION, ABSORPTION AND METAL EXTRACTION BY
Comment :
CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION" tO A VACUUM FILTER DRUM.
HOK-Hetals Recovery • 33.9 / 33.9 208.5 / 208.5 192.2 / 192.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
08-Exempt
01-Operational
01-Tank
PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FROM ELECTROPLATING BATHS.
TXD007321904 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
DALLAS
5 3674 1-On-site activity B-Unknown
3,402,095.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversig,
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND8RUM1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 23
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin.
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
ACID SOLUTION, MILD
8-Unknoun
M121-0ther Trtmt/3.402,095.0
: D002
PS Page
191
System
M121-Other Trtmt
Sec.Ill-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Qper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 3.402,095.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status :
Unit Type : •
Description :
Comment :
TXD041470543 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT AUSTIN
7 3672 1-On-site activity B-Unknown
703,386.8 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comnents .
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
ATS-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
RINSEWATER/WASTEWATER
8-Unknown
M121-Other Trtmt/704,313.0
-------
RS 91 Oversight - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
ATE : 11/15/94 Page 24
. ile : IN08RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
, aeility
D
iaste Codes
PS Page
192
Facility
Name
System
N141-
Sec. Ill -A.
City
: 0003 0005 0006 0001 0007 D008 0009 0010
Influent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.2
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0011
Max
0.0
Future
GM
Page
0018
. Oper
/ 0.0
Avail
SIC
0019
Origin
Code
0020 D021 0022
. (Total/RCRA)
. Code
0023
Point of
0024 0029
Measurement
OOZo 0027
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0,d/
X Future Capacity
0.0
1991 Tons
Generated,
0020 0029 0030 0031
Radio-
active
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
193
194
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : -
Unit Type :
Description : ' •
Couiuent •
M121-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 702,293.5
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comnent :
M141- ' 0.0/0.8
Sec.lll-A. Hen Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Garment : '
• 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
,XD047830443 SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS CARROLLTON
-ource Code : A27-Surface Prep and Finish
orm Code : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
laste Description : ACID, HYDROFLUORIC
1 3674 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
43.3 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Overs! gl
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
JH t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 25
BRS Data for "Metals Products ft Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Garments :
CAS Numbers :
TRI Constituent : 8-Unknown
Onsite Info (System/Ply) ': M121-Other Trtmt/43.3
Waste Codes : 0002
TXD047830443 SOS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS
CARROLLTON
2 3674 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
346.4 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Cpuments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A27-Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
ETCHING SOLUTION. ACID
8-Unknown
M121-Other Trtmt/346.4
D002
TXD047830443 SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS
CARROLLTON
3 3674 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
621,194.5 2-No
Source Code
Form Code.
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent 8-Unknown
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : M121-0ther Trtmt/621,194.5
Waste Codes : D002
ATS-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B101-Inorganic Liquid
WASTEWATER, INDUSTRIAL PROCESS, HYDROCARBON CONTAINING
-------
3RS 91 Oversight • GH 4 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 26
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for'"Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25'Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
fXD047830443 SOS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS
CARROLLTON
10 3674 1-On-slte activity B-Unknown
379.0 2-No
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
Garments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A27-Surface Prep and Finish
B110-Inorganic Liquid
CAUSTIC LIQUID WASTES
8-Unknown
M121-Other Trtmt/379.0
D002
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
TXD980627111 SONY MICROELECTRONICS
SAN ANTONIO
2 3674 1-On-site activity B-Unknown
1,588,770.0 2-No
source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Nutters
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
: A75-PoU Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
Bl19-Inorganic Liquid
WASTEWATER, PROCESS
8-Unknown
H121-Other Trtmt/1,588,770.0
0002
PS Page System
207 M121-Other Trtmt
Sec.lII-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 1,586.865.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0/0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE :. 11/15/94
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 27
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
, Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW .
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
208 M021-Solvents Recovery 0.0 / 0.6
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type :
Description :
Comnent :
209 M021-Solvents Recovery 0.0 / 2.8
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comnent :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
d.O / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
UT0009667536 SIGNETICS COMPANY
OREM
11 3674 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
40.8 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
w ^
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
: AOS-Cleaning I Degreaslng
: 8201-Organic Liquid
5 ISOPRdPANOL - USED AS A CLEANER FOR SILICON WAFERS DURING ICMANUFACTURING.
: 00067-56-1
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : M021-Solvents Recovery/21.0
Waste Codes : D001
-------
RS 91 Oversight
ATE : 11/15/94
tile : IND8RUN1.RPT
CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 28
BRS Data for "Metals Products I Machinery" industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT, Wastes
acility
tO
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated.
Radio-
active
rD009667536 SICNETICS COMPANY
OREN
17 3674 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-NU
611.462.8 2-No
ource Code : A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
iora Code : B119-Inorganic Liquid • . • .
aste Description : WASTE WATER PROCESSED IN AN ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNIT PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO A POTW.
ooraents ' : SECTION IH: WASTEWATER GENERATED FROM THE NEUTRALIZATION OF INORGANIC ACIDS AND BASES,
iAS Hunters : 07647-01-0 07664-38-2 07664-39-3 07664-93-9 07697-37-2
.Rl Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
nsite Info (System/Qty) : M121-0ther Trtmt/611,462.8
aste Codes : D002
PS Page System
1 M021-Solvents Recovery
Sec.llI-A. Hen Max. Oper.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
21.0 / 21.0
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
121.4 / 121.4
'Future Avail. Code
21.0 / 0.0
. X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Coinnent"
M121-Other Trtmt
11-RCRA
01-Operational
01-Tank 02-Container
DISTILLATION OF SPENT ISOPROPANOL ALCOHOL
SECTION 1C: SYSTEM IS NOT REGULATED BY RCRA. BUT GENERATES A RCRA REGULATED WASTE MATERIAL
REUSED ON SITE. .
RECLAIMED MATERIAL IS
611,462.8 / 611,462.8
4,150,771.5 / 4,150;771.5
611,462.8 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational •
Unit Type . : 01-Tank
Description : INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER CONTAINING INORGANIC ACIDS AND BASES NEUTRALIZED IN AN ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNIT PRIOR TO
DISCHARGE TO A POTW. • ,
Comment : SECTION IA: WASTE NEUTRALIZED AND DISCHARGED UNDER NPDES PRETREATMENT PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF OREM, 40 CFR 469 SUBPART A
SEMICONDUCTOR CATEGORY. . SECTION IE: MATERIAL TREATED IN DOUBLE CONTAINED, ABOVE
-------
BRS 91 Oversig, M & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 29
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery1* Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility GM . Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
ID Name City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
GROUND TANK SYSTEM. SECTION 1IA: INFLUENT WASTEWATER GENERALLY ABOVE A PH OF 2
AND LESS THAN 12.5. .
UTD073008237 NATIONAL SEMI CONDUCTOR WEST JORDAN 7 3674 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU « hon-HU 869.318.6 2-No
Source Cede : A02-Cleaning t Degreesing
Form Code : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : SPENT ACID FROM ETCH, CLEANING BATHS AND ION EXCHANGE REGEN-ERATION 'WASTE. THE CORROSIVE WASTE IS NEUTRALIZED IN AM
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM.
Comments : '
\ , • -•
CAS Numbers : 07664-38-2 07664-39-3 07664-41-7 07664-93-9 07697-37-2
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constitufcnt(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M121-Other Trtmt/869,318.6
Waste Codes : 0002
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
~~~T~ M121 -Other Trtmt 1.261.745.6/869,318.6 2,082,235.2/2,082,235.2 1,261.745.6/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0/0.0 1900
. ^ Regulatory Status : 03-POTW,
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNIT. THE UNIT NEUTRALIZES CORRO-SIVE (D002) WASTE WITH SODA ASH SLURRY. NEUTRALIZATION
OCCURS IN TWO TANKS.
. Comment : •
VAD066000993 AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH RICHMOND 37 3672 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU * hon-HJ 246,006.4 2-No
Source Code : A01-Cleaning & Degrees ing . -v
Form Code : B1l6-Inorganlc Liquid
Waste Description : WASTEWATER FROM METAL FINISHING PROCESSES WHICH REQUIRE ONLY NEUTRALIZATION BEFORE DISCHARGING.
Garments : SEC. I, BOX F: A02, A03, A05, A06, A09, A22, A23, A27, A92 SEC. I. BOX K: 1. GLYCOL ETHERS, 3. COPPER COMPOUNDS
-------
i(S 91 Oversight • GH 4 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
ATE : 11/15/94 Page 30
ile : 1ND8RUN1.RPT
8RS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility
.0
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
CAS NUMBERS: 50-00-0, 7439-92-1, 7664-41-7
< AS Numbers :
Rl Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
nsite Info (System/Qty) : M121-0ther Trtot/246,006.4
.raste Codes ' •: 0002
A0066000993 AMERICAN TELEPHONE C TELEGRAPH
RICHMOND
38 3672 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU t hon-HU
701.0 2-No
ource Code
orn Code
a«t» Description
oonents
AS Numbers
iRI Constituent
jnslte Info (System/Oty)
A02-Cleaning I Degreesing
B106-Inorganic Liquid
WASTEWATER FROM METAL FINISHING PROCESSES WHICH CONTAIN
SEC. I, BOX F: A03
CAS NUMBERS: 7439-92-1
3-TRI Constituent(s)
H077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/701.0 M121-Other Trtmt/701.0
COMPLEXED METALS WHICH MUST BE REMOVED BEFORE DISCHARGING.
SEC. I, BOX K: 1. GLYCOL ETHERS, 2. COPPER COMPOUNDS
D008 0002
Jaste Codes
PS Page System
1 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
1,012.947,7 / 1,012,414.5
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
3,331,276.1 / 3,331,276.1
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1,012,414.5 / 1,012,414.5
Residual (Total/RCRA)
820.2 / 820.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1919
Regulctory Status : 03-POTW . '
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description > : CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF METALS FROM WASTEWATER PRODUCED BY PRINTED WIRING BOARD MANUFACTURING PLANT (D002, D008, F007)
IN TANKS.
Conroent :
2 M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0 208,507.1 / 208,507.1 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BBS 91 Oversi9. GM'» PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 31
File : IND8RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Metals Products & Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH -
Page'
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 02-Temporarily Idle
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHROMIUM REDUCTION AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF CHROMIUM CONTAINING UASTEUATERt.
Comment :
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 701.0/701.0 1,459.6/1,459.6 700.6 / 700.6 0.6/0.6
Sec.lll-A. New MBA. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0,0 / 0.0 1900 '
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational '
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF COMPLEXED METALS FROM UASTEUATERS (D008.D002).
Comment : • , '
M121-0ther Trtmt 246,006.4 / 246,006.4 1,405,171.0 / 1,405,171.0 246.006.4 / 246,006.4 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. . New Max; Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900 .
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal >
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NUETRALIZATION OF UASTEWATER IN TANKS (0002,0008). . •
Comment :
H083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0 43,236.0 / 43,236,0 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A.y New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
.•
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 02-Temporarily Idle
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : AIR STRIPPING OF METHYLENE CHLORIDE FROM SEGREGATETED UASTEWATERS, DONE IN TANKS.
Comment :
M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0 432,360.3 / 432,360.3 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0/0.0 1900 .
-------
JRS 91 Oversight • CM t PS forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 32
File : INDBRUN1.RPT
Facility Facility
ID Name
BRS Data for "Metals Products ft Machinery" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
CM
City Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Conment
: 03-POTU
: 02-Tetnporarily Idle
: 01-Tank ;
: AIR STRIPPING OF 1,1,1 TRICNLOROETHANE FROM SEGREGATED UASTEWATERS, DONE IN TANKS.
-------
ATTACHMENT 12-2
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO BRS DATA
-------
12-2-1
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Buckbee-Mears, Cortland
DATE: 12/9/94 and 12/15/94
CONTACT NAME: BUI George
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 604-753-9615/ Fax 607-753-8198
ICF CONTACT NAME: Daniel Goldberg
Waste Generation and Management
• Mr. George said that the facility generates wastewaters from acid cleaning and photoresist
stripping.
• These wastes carry the RCRA waste codes of D002 and D007. The wastes are treated on
site, and when they go to POTW they are considered non-hazardous wastewater.
• The UTS constituents with their end-of-pipe concentrations in the wastewater are:
Phenol [0-0.1 mg/1] and chromium [0.2-0.8 mg/1]
• The waste streams are aggregated with other waste streams. They are treated by
chromium reduction, pH neutralization, precipitation,'and settling.
s ,
• Mr. George said that the only land-based unit used at the facility is a concrete clarifier
tank. There are no Subtitle C surface impoundments at the facility. The sludge in the
clarifier tank is. not a toxicity characteristic waste and it is managed as a hazardous waste.
The contents of the clarifier tank do not leak into surrounding soils. The maximum
concentration of the total volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the wastewaters in the
clarifier tank is 50 ppb.
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• Mr. George did not think that the plant would re-pipe and/or otherwise modify the system
if the previously discussed wastes were required to be segregated and treated for
• underlying UTS constituents.
• He did not know if there are any alternative treatment systems that are available or will
soon be available.
Waste Discharge Agreement
• The facility uses a City Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit. Mr. George did not
know if the permit uses indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the.presence of
-------
12-2-2
others or if there are other pollutants in the wastewater not addressed by the permit.
Special Wastes
• Mr. George said that the facility does not generate any "special" wastes.
-------
o ? •''•'•
?-i o? r*
b*Q -? 8* wj?
I. . • «i 1- *- «*
I'V'i1 1 -1 T
Etching & Cold
Developer - - •*• ^ , -
Ferric Both
Tl .'in
o ? O < I o
^9 ' «• . S .Q MJ
• .,! s 5
V "/> '"
r>.s / M
nx^ ?£ r» w»n
KS ij is ;{&
il ]IJ insi
^ - *"t 1 1
II II
coustic c°ld F_er;;f
Stripper — -•-- Fl°w Bolh -
Rinse o
M 1 !
i t i i *
§ • * . * « ^
50 t«
M • Applies to Lines I a
rH~- -'
line 3
rtci ^
i7-
,J-.
-l,R^
u_l_.
^ 1 1
*»»
0\tf*v
\
r— ' —
fa
1$.
§4^
61^^
A
&
nd 2 Only
;
i
L
»
^t
h
4A
'1
1
^
c
-------
Steel---
Acid
Cleaning
°
4zii " » w 30
bin ii
III!-;!
i Couslic •
! Passivation
Finishing Operations / Insp.
&
Storage / Shipping
s
o
o
M/UCDIM
p|DM|F
rimib
Buckbee-Medrs Cortland
Process Flow Diagram
Mini
INC
-------
Ol REGENERATION
012 (M3 i
AGIO CAUSTIC
INFLUENT WFLUENT
(TOTAL -(,130 1 TOTAL -8 130
MLRMSEWW Dl EQUALIZATION TANK :
/TAL..Z44A Neuwaaaiion 01 waamnuer torn www trrujfem- TOTAL. 17. JPO
. 0 ^ WUnfcS^^ NOM4UZAROOUS HW - 0
M121
i
; 1
mEATED PROCESS
* &^%miBA4*eeo unit
• NOtrPnOubSa WW
TOTAL* 447£vA I i
i MwiTit<7ftrt pnocEsa DRAIN uwts TOTAL .HW -iniot i
,1 "*»• 385.700 Chiwnlum Reduction — . '- —
U-ACtOaEAN M071 , ' '(
UtaMlnOMul) j
03-OOATER ' '] • . '
M*OEV.WASH
06-DEV.BATH ;
^QJVPWTO*^ TOTAL- \77.\OO
UNTREATED PROCES
NON-PROCESS WW
( i
. .i NOTE: ALL VALUES IN TONS
; No. OF PROD. DAYS USED FOR ALL CALCS.
WW - Waste Water
WWTP * Waste Water Treatment Ptani
HW - Hazardous Wade
i >
TOTAL WWTP MFLUENT
WNHLTfMtE)
TOTAL- 743,100 WWTPNOMffOCESS
P "1 418.400 TOT^ . jft 35t)
: HW . Oil'. 1,260
PIAMT WWTP 1
WFUJEMT WWTP 1
(TOTM.WWTPBTLT4- M12S f
NOWfROCEBS)
_ NEUTRALIZATION TANKS
^ HnalNeutralbaUon
TOTAL- 474.ROO M121
^^'m CLARF.EH •*••'
PiBdpttatton&Ctariflcation RAW
M123 SLUDGE.
* IIMf IJ 9^JL
iMMn ait
WWTP CCC1 1 rtfT *""^****
NON4MZATOOUS ' 740 QA A
nniALWrnP) TOTAL » /'Ib.oOO
f MVf.O
4 ft A 7/1 fl -
Moo I
FB.TER ^JJj^
MIDI M*" 1.4 43
REPORTING YEAq
1993
IbUCXBEE-MEARSOOIITALND
OordanLMY
1
i
i
c
c
a
0
E
c
rr
X
u>
19
-------
ICUTRMJZATlON TANKS
4ASTE
-VATER
FIDW DIASFWVI
PRETREATMENT
SYSTEM
y
o
X
OB
tr.
f.
I
e
o
•-i
o
o
en
-------
MI-JARS
PART 1-SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Permit #2
1. During the term of this permit the permittee is authorized to discharge wastewater to the
City of Cortland sewer system from the outfalls listed below:
Outfall. Description*
001 10-inch process wastewater from Building 3
002 6-inch sanitary sewer from Building 2
003 10-inch sewer at Manhole No. 6
•Outfall locations are referenced st the Buckbee Mears site plan (Sheet WW-01) dated April 2,
199L
2. During the term of Are permit, fee discharge from^Pjitfall 00} shall not exceed the
following effluent limitations. Effluent from this outfall shall consist of process (metal
finishing and non-process^ wastewater from the manufacturing of aperture masks for color video
PARAMETER
FLOW GAL/DAY
Cadmium (total), mg/L
Chromium (total) mg/L
Copper (total). mg/L
Cyanide (total) mg/L
Lead (total) mg/L
Nickel (total) mg/L
Silver (total) mg/L
.Zinc (total) mg/1
Total Toxie Organic* (TTOX
mg/L ""
MAXIMUM
MONTHLY
AVG.
560,000
0.21
1.40
1.70
0.53
"" 0.35
1.96
0.20
1.22
— .
PEAK DAY
., - ' — —
0.57
2.28
2.78
0.99
0.57
3^7
OJS
2.14
1.75
The term total toxic organics (HO) is defmed as the sum of all concentrations geater than 0.01
mg/1 for the toxic listed in Attachment A to this permit
-------
BICKBKt MKAKS
(2)009. 009
FART 1-SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Permit #2
3. During the term of this permit, the discharge from Outfall 002 shall be of domestic or non-
process wastewater and shall comply with the provisions of Article U of the City of
Cortland Wastewater Discharge Law.
4. During the terms of this permit, the discharge fnmQtatfall 003) shall consist of the
combined discharges from Outfalls 001 and 002 and shaUcompJy with the provisions of Article
H of the Chy of Cortland Wastewater Law. and the following effluent limitations:
PARAMETER
Flow (GPD)
Arsenic (total)
Cadmium (total)
Chromium (total)
Copper (total)
Iron (total)
Lead (total)
Nickel (total)
Selenium (total)
Silver (total)
Zinc (total)
Cyanide (total)
Phenolics (total)
Chloroform
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes~fr>tal)
Diethyl phthalate
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Total Toxic Organics
MAXIMUM DAILY (MG/L)
700.000
0.2
0.1
0.8
0.8
"30.0
0.2
1.8
'. 0.2
0.16
1.72
0.18
0.09
0.1
0.13
0.13
0.65
0.2
0.4
1.40
-------
12-2-5
i
• When asked if there are any alternative treatment systems that are available or will soon
be available, he said that the facility has investigated both electrolytic recovery of metals
from solution as well as a reverse osmosis system for wastewater treatment.
Waste Discharge Agreement
• Mr. Pakdel said that the facility discharges pretreated industrial wastes directly to the San
Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant in compliance with terms of the
wastewater discharge permit
• The permit regulates the following constituents [maximum allowable concentration in
mg/1]: TTO [2.13], cadmium [.69], chromium [1.0], copper [2.7], cyanide total [1.0], lead
[.4], nickel [2.6], silver [.43], zinc [2.6]. Mr. Pakdel said that the sampling and analysis are
performed for the materials, both internally and externally, without the use of any
surrogate chemicals.
• He said that there were no pollutants that are not addressed at all.
Special Wastes
• Mr. Pakdel said that the facility does not generate any "special" wastes.
-------
M«*i Avail
WORKSHEET
3E
MASS AUDIT STUDY
for: Dyn*.Cr«l! Inc.
*»p«r«d 8r : 8«rytar
Facility Data: Detail Process Flow Diagram of WWTP System
j
-------
12-2-6
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: U.S. Steel Corporation Fairless Works
DATE 11/29/94
CONTACTNAME: AlanLewis
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 215-736-1217
ICF CONTACT NAME: Daniel Goldberg
Waste Generation and Management
•* • Mr. Tjewis ^ard that Ins facility gcueidlc& spent caustic cleaning solutions, liuses, "and spent
acid cleaning solutions as waste from cleaning carbon steel
• These wastes carry the D002 waste code, and in 1991, 856,7503 tons were generated.
• Mr. Lewis explained that the D002 rinses are commingled and neutralized.
• The main type of treatment for the wastes is a flash mixer that stabilizes pH, and then the
waste is transferred to clarifiers. Mr. Lewis said that no land based units are used.
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• When asked if the plant would re-pipe and/or otherwise modify the system if the D002
wastes were to be segregated and treated for underlying UTS constituents, Mr. Lewis did
not feel that the question was applicable to the facility.
Waste Discharge Agr
Mr. Lewis stated that the facility uses a NPDES permit He did not believe that it uses
indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the presence of others.
The NPDES permit regulates these constituents at the following concentrations [mg/1]:
hexavalent chromium [.056], lead [1.89], tetrachloroethylene [.108], total chromium [2.77],
nickel [3.98], naphthalene [.071], zinc [238], cadmium [.69], copper [338], cyanide
silver [.43], TPO [2.13].
Mr. Lewis said that there were no pollutants that are not addressed at all
Mr. Lewis said that the water is discharged directly to surface waters.
-------
12-2-7
Special Wastes
• Mr Lewis said that the facility does not generate any "special" wastes.
-------
ATTACHMENT 12-3
DETAILED RESULTS OF TODAY'S PROPOSED RULE
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-------
Hmenttc fit AimTyoc fag TCP, XC Oiff^Sc, zo& TC PaftfifV Wastewatas
-------
Pell
C«*
~ 124
1 14S
124
ras
124
ias
T24
US
124
US
124
14)
124
141
124
ias
124
14S
124
ias
124
14)
124
T24
14)
14)
124
124
14)
14)
124
14)
124
14)
f>4
14)
124
us
1 Cone..
•J Uvil
0.044
• 0.0)9-
0.044
0.019
0.044
0.039
0.044
0.019
0.044
0.019
0.044
0.039
0.044
0.0)9
0.044
0.0)9
• 0.044
0.019
0.044
0.0)9
0.044
0.0)9
0.044
0.044
0.019
0.039
0.044
0.044
0.039
0.039
0.0*4
0.039
0.044
0.019
0.0*4
0.019
0.044
0.019
IIU
10
29)0
2998-
2950
29U
2910
2910
29M
29)0
29SB
29)0
29U
29)0
29U
29)0
29)0
29)0
191)0
191)0
191)0 -
191)0
191)0
191)0
191)0
191)1
191)0
HIM
191)0
19IM
191)0
19IM
19158
I91SO
I9ISO
1?l)9
191)0
191)0
191SO
191M
ItrtM
10
24-1 '
— M«r •
»-l
SS-1
n-2
SS-2
so- 10
•SB-10
SB-*
so**
50-7
SO-7
SO-O
so-o
Si-9
SO-O
14-1
14-1
11-1
11-1
1)1-1
m-i
410-1
410-1
410-1
418-1
410-2
410-2
411-2
410-2
)••!!
10-11
SO-12
SB-12
SO-S
Sl-1
SO-4
90-4
Pull
9JWV1
Co*
124"
" " * 148
•1W
124
•0*^
M'
f
124
124
124
VOkv
14$
124
14)
124
124
14S
124
'•T
141
124
149
9V«P
124
14S
US
124
ias
141
124
14S
124
14S
124
14S
124
US
Printout of rtla
Follcom
nd
....
4.)4743992S
' ~S;*042999M
4.S4743992S
S.4042979M
4.S474S9929
S.M42999M
O.I4S71HS9
O.I02IS9449
2.4*OS24Sn
I.OBMS8217
2.448)24171
1.08MSS217
1.01737904
2.039*72)01
742)12*224
< t.lSSJOTnO
0.2)87731*0
I0.12S444940
0.000194009
0.000909107
0.14*119*00
0.102099901
O.OSA044S07
O.OSMWS07
I.2S)924U1
1.2)5924)83
0.0097*2087
0.0097*2087
O.SM7124BS
O.S347I24U
79.47U7009I
99.S4BSS7*tt
n.71S*29209
42.144SSM1I
19.905474729
44.102*3411
IS.7B3S99I72
I9.72924B94S
•"• rvuw
0.000 124
0.000* -145"
1 0.000 T24
O.OW T*s
0.000 124
0.000 US
0.00* 1M
0.000 161
O.OM 124
0.000 |*S
0.000 124 ,
O.OM MS
0.000 124
0.009 16)
0.000 124
0.000 ias
0.000 124
O.OM ras
0.000 124
0.000 ras
0.000 124
0.000 US
0.000 T24
0.000 R4
0.000 ias
0.000 .US •
0,000 124
0.000 124
0.000 14S
. 0.000 149
0.000 124
0.000 US
0.000 124
0.000 14S
0.000 124
0.000 US
0.000 124
0.000 ias
HW rouMM
2-Ctt.OMWM ' ^
•^••UMVMNJL
••••MM -
2-cflLotorBfim.
MKHOL
rflMllfb .
'i-CVLOMMMM '
•'^•MillW HUM.
rum
, 2-enodofHttot
1 ronoL-
2-MOROPUtOl
mm.
2'CBUUpaim.
MOW.
2-cajtommi
NNOL . . -
2-CMtfBflBffMMM
• •W.lMWHEinK
. wom • .
i-ouwmm
PMONL
i-€M.otonaoL
fHfldX.
••CULflMMVHM
•^•"»wwomoyoii|»
PWHOL
2-CHLOWPWot
2-CtfUWPWW.
'Horn.
9HEHOL
2-|M «W OM
*"• ~j rf .
1881.924 24 *S4S"
7881,924- "24* MS "
70D.924 24 MS
7MS.924 24 MS
tMl.924 24 MS
nU.92* 24 S4S
IMI.92* 24 MS
7883.92* 24 MS
7811.92* 24 MS 1
•*•• *BA4 A
78B),92* 24 MS
788S.92* 24 MS
78U.9M 24 I4S
780.92* 24 MS
"B.9M 24 S4S
788S.92* 24' MS
1881.92* ]
I99S4.98I
199)4.981
199)4.901
199)4.941
199)4.901
199)4.981
199)4.981
I99M.90I
19994.901
199)4.981
1t9)4.M1
19994.981
19914.M1
199)4.981
199)4.981
199)4.981
199)4.981
199)4.901
19994.981 .
199)4.981.
I99M.981 -
199)4.981
14 MS
2BS
28S
26)
281
28S
»» ,
281
MS
Ml
US
28)
249
US
26S
28S
28S
20)
28)
20)
2B)
28)
28S
Cora
*iRfH
0.05410000
0.04400000
0.01410000
0.0*400008
^•^^^RrJ^PW^
0.0)4)0100
0.0*4M*00
O.OMMIOO
0.04400000
0.0)4)0000
0.06400000
O.OS4SQOOO
0.0440NOO
0,05450100
0.044MIM
*• •^'^OJP^BJ
0.0)6)0000
0.04400000
O.OS4SOOOO
0.0*400000
O.OS4MIOO
0.04440IDO
» • w^v^^WV
0.054JOOOO
0.04400000
O.OMMIOO
o'oisMial
Q.OS4SOIM
0.09490000
O.AMIUIflA
•WWVVUU
0.0*400100
0.0141010)
O.M4MIO)
O.OS4MOOO
0.04*00000
0.054)0000
0.0*480000
O.OS4MIOO
8.I44M0IM
09/02m
-------
Nil
cm.
Ltwl
tltt . itrt«
10 10
Poll
tato.1
Mlcom
Ind
Printout of Hit pwl»
pollcodtPollniM
flpN
M
Com
1*4 __ f2* 2'cmawwwn. iffM.vot
Iftooititfrv
12.n«SM2»
0.000 124
"orooo"w»'
0.090, 124
0.000 141
0.010 f24
O.OM fol
O.OM m
1.000 145
• / 281
• m
a tai
• m
o 201
• til
I 101
• its
j.nuoooo
o!l94MOOO
oioUNOU
O.OMWOtl
0.01430100
124
T49
1M
124
0.044
0.019
0.044
I.OS9
1.044
O.Wf
11-4
WHO SO-4
WIJO 91-0
IflM 11*1
I»IM n
-------
Resate of Analysis for 1CB, TC Oiyanfc, and 1C Ptesfldde Wabtemim
Aviated Weight Ktctora Applied
-------
•It
10
19190
19)30
191)0
191)0"
191)0
191)0
19150
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19190
19150
19110
19190
191)0
19110
OtrcM
10
51-4
.50-4 .
504
-90*5 —
90-12
SO-4
90-S
SO*
90-f
50-1
91-12
S04
90-11
90-11
31-1
11-1
410-1
14-1
410-1
4W-I
410-2
414-2
410-2
410-2
14-1
410-1
.4.00MOOOOOO.
4.0000000000
4.9000000000
4.1010000000
Cone.
Lml
O.OU
0.019
0.044
-o.o»-
0.0(«
0,119
O.M4
O.U9
0.044
O.OS9
Nllcedi Ml
124
124
Prli of Fl<« pirttf.
flow
2-CM.OROPKNOl
4.0010000000
WO^^^WWBRWWRP
A.OON000008
4.0000000000
4.0000000000
4.0000000000
4.0000000000
4.0000000000
0.059
0.044
1.059
0.0(4
0.059
0.044
0.059
0.0(4
0.059
O.M4
0.059
0.059
0.444
0.059
0.059
0.044
0.044
0.044
0.059
114
149
f}4
149
T24
T49
IZ4
T49
R4
T49
m
T49
124
T4S
W
T49
T4S
T24
T«
T49
124
Tt4
m
141
2'CMLonraon.
Nairn. .
nun. _
1'CM.OMWM.
t-CHLOMMBO.
NHOL
NE«Ot
HHW.
fllML
niwi
s-no.01
tpy COM
fotftow
HBO.
1995(.90t
19954.901 .
199U.90I
W954.90f -
!99)4.90l
199)4.901
19M4.90I
199)(.9fll
199)4.901
199)(.90l
irm.Wl
199)(.90t
I9W(.90|
199)4.901
199)4.901
199)4.901
WJ4.W1
199I4.MI
19914.901
19954.901
19954.901
19954.901
19954.901
19954.901
19994.901
19914.901
199)4.901
199)4.901
19954.901
199)4.901
249
.-249
245
:T'JJJ'J
249
201
205
209
209
249
' 209
209
209
205
249
209
209
209
209
205
205
205
205
205
209
209
209
209
209
205
0,01410000
.0.04400000-
0.05439001
"O.M40WOO-
0.0)450000
0.04400000
O.OM54MO
0.04400000
0.05450000
0.04400000
0.09450000
0.04400000
0.05450000
0.04400000
0.95450000
0.044000M
. 0.05450000
0.04400000
O.OMSOOOO
0.04400000
0.0)450000
0.04400000
0.04400000
0.09410000
0.04400000
0.04400000
0.0)430000
0.05450000
O.OM50000
0.04400000
(5(9/554.400
49497354.440...
49(9f594.400
4«ms«.«*r
49(9/554.400
49491394.400
49491394.404
49497J94.400
49(91354.400
45(913)4.400
49(913)4.400
41(913)4.400
49491354.490
49(97594.400
49(97354.490 .
45497594.400
49(97554.400
49(9/3)4.404
49(9/3)4.400
49497554.400
49497S54.400
49497554.400
4949/5)4.400
49(97554.400
49491354.400
49(9/354.400
4M9/554.400
49(97594.400
49491354.400
49497JU.4M
27290(1(0.000
2/2944140.0M-
272944940.040
272944140.004
27290(140.000
27290(140.000
272904KO.ni
272904140.400
272924140.000
27290(1(0.000
2/2904KO.OOO
272904140.000
272904 WO.OOO
272904MO.OOO
27290(140.000
27290(140.000
27290(140.000
272904140.009
27290(140.000
2729241(0.000
2729041(0.009
2729M140.400
27290(140.000
27290(1(0.000
272904149.040
272904KO.OM
272904140.014
272944140.000
27290(140.000
272904140.000
09/02/94
-------
Besotts of Analysis of Facilities nffli Less Han 100,000 jpd How
-------
IIU14 Mtco*
IflM , 114 t-OLOIOPHBtt
Printout of rlU •IrlmB
Cone Moil Totflew
O.OM50000 4S49nS6.»M mWt*
inittw.
Mjjigt
6.0000000000 M
1.0000000006 fcr
-------
frlnum «f flU Indlmfl
HUM Mica* fell
WB '. 124
•WIT -rui -• mm.
wn ; m
Sana •
O.OSAIOOM
-o:o6
-------
CHAPTER 13
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR THE PESTICIDES INDUSTRY
13.1 INTRODUCTION
This analysis of the required treatment capacity of the pesticides industry was developed
to support today's proposed rule. The following sections are presented in this report: summary
of Gndings (Section 13.2); background on the pesticides industry (Section 13.3); waste types
potentially subject to this rule (Section 13.4); available data on wastes generated and managed at
pesticide manufacturing facilities (Section 13.5); and the required capacity analysis for the
pesticides industry (Section 13.6).
13.2 SUMMARY
The pesticide industry includes both pesticide manufacturers and formulators/packagers.
Pesticide manufacturers produce the active ingredients for these products, while'
formulators/packagers process these ingredients with other substances and package pesticide
products for sale. A summary of the estimated impact of today's proposed rule is presented in
Exhibit 13-1. There are 75 facilities in this industry; however, EPA assumes that the 32 facilities
co-treat OCPSF wastewaters with pesticide manufacturing wastewaters. Of these, 12 facilities are
direct dischargers, 12 are indirect dischargers (one facility discharges both directly and indirectly),
and 20 facilities are zero dischargers. The 43 existing pesticide manufacturers discharge
approximately 3 million tons of total wastewaters mixed with ICRT wastes every year. Of these,
approximately 2 million tons are discharged directly, and 0.17 million tons are discharged indirectly
EXHIBIT 13-1
MAJOR FINDINGS FOR THE PESTICIDES INDUSTRY
Discharge
Mode
Direct
Indirect
Zero
Total
Number of
Faculties
12
12
20
43"
Total
Mixed with ICRT
Wastes (tons/yr)"
2,186,580
168,492
639,887
2^94,959
Facilities
Without
RCRA-
equivalent
Treatment"
12
12
20
43
Faculties
with Land-
based Units"
1 to 3
1 to 3
0
2to6
Affected
Faculties"
Ito3
1 to 3
0
2to6
Affected
Wastewater
(thousand
tons/yr)"
182 to 547
14 to 42
0
196 to 589
' The quantities in this column were determined on an aggregated basis and apportioned to the direct, indirect, and
zero dischargers based on the percentage of each discharge mode.
b One facility discharges both directly and indirectly. Therefore, summing the direct, indirect, and zero dischargers
will result in 44 facilities.
-------
13-2
to surface waters. All facilities are most likely to generate ICR and TC organic wastes and
several underlying hazardous constituents present in the wastewaters appear to be above the UTS
levels. EPA estimates that approximately 5 to 14 percent of the facilities are likely to have land-
based units as part of their wastewater treatment system. Based on the data reviewed, EPA
estimates that 2 to 6 facilities and approximately 200,000 to 600,000 tons of wastewater per year
are likely to be impacted by today's proposed rule.
133 BACKGROUND1
The pesticides industry includes both manufacturers and formulators/packagers. Pesticide
manufacturing facilities produce the Pesticide Active Ingredients (PAIs). Formulators/packagers
process active ingredients with other ingredients into pesticide formulations and package them for
distribution and sale. The pesticide industry is included within, but not limited to, SIC Major
Group 28, Chemical and Allied Products. More specifically, facilities manufacturing PAIs may be
engaged in one or more of the following SIC groups: 2831; 2833; 2834; 2842; 2843; 2861; 2865;
2869; 2879; and 2899. There were 75 manufacturing faculties, located in 29 states. Of these, 46
also manufacture products covered under the organic chemicals industry. The majority of
pesticide manufacturing facilities are located in the eastern half of the United States and along
the Gulf Coast Approxunately~50rpercent of all pesticide production occurs in these areas.
A wide variety of PAIs and classes of PAIs are produced by the pesticide chemicals
manufacturing industry, which are categorized into the following nine types:
•
• Herbicides: used for weed control;
• - Insecticides: used for control of insects;
• Rodenticides: used for control of rodents;
• Fungicides: used for control of fungi;
• Nematocides: used for control of a particular class of worms, which are often
parasites of animals and plants;
• Miticides: used for control of mites, which are. tiny arachnids that often infest
prepared food or act as parasites on animals, plants, or insects; .
• Disinfectants: used for control of bacteria and viruses;
-- • Defoliants: used to remove leaves from growing plants; and
1 Most of this section is summarized from: U.S. EPA, 1993 (September), Development Document for
Effluent Guidelines, Pretreatment Standards, and New Source Standards for the Pesticide Chemicals
Manufacturing Point Source Category, Office of Water, Effluent Guidelines Division, EPA-821-R-93-016.
-------
13-3
• Synergists: used in conjunction with other substances to enhance the effects of
each.
There are approximately 128 PAIs and classes of PAIs representing 186 individual active
ingredients manufactured by 225 separate production processes. Of these 225 processes, 178 are
batch processes. A "typical" facility in the pesticide manufacturing industry manufactures only one
active ingredient and is the only facility in the country producing that PAL 'Typical" production
is between 1,000,000 and 10,000,000 pounds of total PAI for a year.
Pesticide manufacturing processes involves two stages: the manufacture of a PAI, '
followed by the formulation and packaging of the PAI. The PAI manufacturing processes, are
highly dependent upon the type of PAIs being manufactured at the facility. Generally, a PAI is
manufactured by the chemical reaction of two or more raw materials often in the presence of
solvents, catalysts, and acidic or basic reagents. The raw materials may include any of a large
number of organic and inorganic compounds. PAIs may also be used as raw materials in
manufacturing derivative PAIs typically through the formation of various salts and esters. The
formulation of pesticides is done through the mixing, blending, or dilution of one or more PAIs.
Exhibit 13-2 shows the flow diagram of a typical PAI manufacturing process.
13.4 WASTE TYPES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY TODAY'S RULE
Because of the: wide variety of raw materials and processes used and of products
manufactured, a wide variety of pollutants are found in this industry's wastewaters. The pesticide
manufacturers use a wide variety of in-plant and eiid-bf-pipe controls, such as steam stripping,
biological .treatment, activated carbon, chemical oxidation, and hydrolysis, to treat these pollutants.
The sources of wastewater reported at pesticide manufacturing facilities:
• "" "PAI process wastewaters;
• Other pesticide wastewater, and
• Other facility wastewaters.
PAI process wastewaters: Waters leaving the manufacturing or production process are
known as PAI process wastewaters. Wastewaters resulting from various processes include:
• • Water of reaction - formed during chemical reaction;
» Process solvent - used to transport or support the chemicals involved in the
reaction process; . •
• Process stream wash water - added to the spent acid or base (carrier) which has
been separated from the reaction mixture, to purify the stream by washing away
the impurities;
• Product wash water - used to purify an intermediate product or active ingredient;
• Spent Acid/Caustic - discharged from reaction process; .
-------
13-4
EXHIBIT 13-2 .
FLOW DIAGRAM OF A TYPICAL PESTICIDE MANUFACTURING PROCESS
1
1
*
flMdm
. . - •
i
*
i
*
*
RMoftn
i
i
*
i
t
I'
_*_
SvpataOon
Product
I
t
!•». Product Wnb)
Furtw prootntno
May alto tea
Source: U.S. EPA, 1993 (September), op.ot
-------
13-5
• " Product/process laboratory quality control wastewater: and
• Safety shower water - used to deluge an employee, clothing and all, in the event
of an accident
Most of these sources of wastewater are common for all PAI manufacturing processes.
Few other sources associated with pesticide operations include:
• Steam jet/vacuum pump solvent or wastewater - stripped from the reaction
mixture, through the operation of a venturi or vacuum pump;
• Air pollution control scrubber blowdown - wastewater or acid/basic compounds
used in air emission control scrubbers;
• Equipment and floor wash - wastewater from equipment and floor cleaning
process;
• Pump seal wastewater - from leakage of water used in lubricate pumps and cool
packing; . •
• Shipping container cleanout - wastewater from cleaning shipping containers;
• Contact cooling water - water used to cool steam and other emissions from
evaporating water from products; and
«... General/uncategorized process wastewater - a combination of sources or cases
where total flow is greater than the sum of individual identified parts.
Water used in" these processes could result in the water being contaminated with PAIs or
other compounds used in the manufacturing process. Exhibit 13-3 shows process wastewaters
generated by different sources-.
Other pesticide wastewater sources: Wastewaters generated-during pesticide production
from non-process sources which can also contain pesticide and other pollutants. These include:
• Showers used by pesticide production employees - any PAIs the employee might
have inadvertently contacted could be washed into the wastewaters;
• . Laundries used to wash clothing from pesticide production employees - any PAIs
that might be on the employee uniforms could be washed into the wastewaters;
• Cleaning safety equipments used in pesticide production - cleaning of goggles,
respirators, and boots with solvents followed by a soap and water wash could wash
the contaminants into the wastewater; and
• Contaminated stormwater - accidents, leaks, spills, shipping losses, and fugitive
emissions can all lead to PAIs and other pollutants into the stormwater.
-------
13-6
EXHIBIT 13-3
PAI PROCESS WASTEWATERS GENERATED IN 1986 BY EFFLUENT TYPE8
Effluent Type
Product Wash
Scrubber Slowdown
Process Stream Wash
Process Solvent
Spent Acid
General Process/Unidentified Wastewater
Contaminated Stormwater
Steam Jet/Vacuum Pump
Equipment Wash
Spent Solvent- '. - -
Spent Caustic -..—_. .
Total
Waste Volume (gal/yr)
487,669,000
207,232,000
201,232,000
196,042,000
178,212,000
58,894,000
43,810,000
28,255,000
22,492,000
15,001,000
: 6,890,000
1,445,554,000
Percent
33.7
14.3
13.9
.13.6
123
4.1
3.0
2.0
1.6
1.0
0.5
100.0
Number of
Facilities
40
33
35
29
7
17
4
7
18
15
4
209
.a U.S. EPA, 1993 (September), op. tit. " .
- "- .f-.;---J^i- ~f ,^ •:",•. " .- .
Most of the facUities do not monitor these sources (except for stormwater), and not all
facilities have all of these "other" sources. Data from faculties that reported these sources are
provided in Exhibit 13-4. •; ..-!_.
''" ' - .
Other facility wastewater co-treated with pesticide wastewaters: Often, pesticide
manufacturing faculties also manufacture other products. Wastewaters generated from other
operations may be co-treated with wastewaters from pesticide chemicals manufacturing. Facilities
reported co-treating wastewater from the following production operations:
. • Pesticide Formulating/Packaging (PFP) of "in-scope" and "out-of-scope" PAIs ("out
of scope" PAIs are those PAIs not included in the list of 269 PAIs and classes of
PAIs considered for regulation);
• Organic Chemicals, Plastics, Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF);
• Inorganic Chemicals;
Pharmaceuticals;
-------
13-7
EXHIBIT 13-4
WASTEWATERS GENERATED AT EXISTING FACILITIES FROM OTHER PESTICIDES
WASTEWATER SOURCES"
Source
Showers
Laundry
Safety Equipment
Contaminated Stormwater
Average Wastewater
Generated (gal/day)
2,300
1,330
1,414
210,211
Number of Facilities
56
19
39
39
a U.S. EPA, 1993 (September), op. at. '
• Other Manufacturing: including production of out-of-scope PAIs or wastewater
from manufacturing operations not listed above; and
• Other Wastewater: including sources such as sanitary wastewater.
OCPSF operations contribute the largest percentage of the co-treated wastewater, and the
largest number of facilities. On average, 50 percent of the total wastewater volume from
treatment systems that co-treat pesticide and OCPSF manufacturing wastewaters is due to QCPSF
processes: Thirty-two (32) of the 75 facilities co-treat OCPSF wastewater with pesticide.
manufacturing wastewater. '• -\ . . •,
13.5 AVAILABLE DATA v
Several data sources were used for obtaining information on the generation and
management of the wastes by the pesticide industry. A description of the data sources is given in
Chapter 3 of the main text of the background document. The applicable information obtained
from these data sources is provided in the sections below.
13.5.1 Effluent Guidelines Development Document
The effluent guidelines development document provided the most recent data on the
pesticide manufacturing facilities. According to these data, there are 75 facilities in the pesticide
manufacturing industry. Of these, 28 facilities are direct dischargers, 28 are indirect dischargers
(one facility discharges wastewaters both directly and indirectly) and 20 faculties are zero
dischargers. Of the 20 zero discharging facilities, 7 facilities generate no process wastewater
because of recycle/reuse operations or because they do not use water2, and 10 facilities use on
U.S. EPA. 1993 (September), op. cit.
-------
13-8
site or off site deep well injection, and 3 facilities discharge their wastewaters through
incineration. The 75 current pesticide manufacturers generate approximately 1.36 billion gallons
of process wastewater. These facilities discharge approximately 1.22 billion gallons of wastewater
either directly or indirectly to surface waters. Approximately 83 percent of the wastewater is
discharged directly and 6 percent is discharged indirectly. The rest is discharged by deep well
injection. Exhibit 13-5 summarizes process wastewater flows by discharge status.
EXHIBIT 13-5
TOTAL PROCESS WASTEWATER FLOW BY TYPE OF DISCHARGE"
Discharge Status
Direct
Indirect
No Discharge
Total
Number of Facilities
28
28
20
76"
Percent of Facilities
37
37
26
100
Total Flow (gal)
1,133,784,000
87^65,000
142,197,000
1,363,346,000
' U.S. EPA, 1993 (September), op.cit. __ . . _
b The number of facilities is grater than 75 due to one facility that discharges both directly and indirectly.
Upon EPA's request, the pesticide manufacturing facilities supplied self-monitored waste
characterization data for the purpose of developing effluent guidelines. To expand and augment
these data, EPA conducted on-site sampling at 23 facilities between 1988 and 1990. EPA's
sampling data collection efforts included analyses for conventional pollutants, priority pollutants,
PAIs, and other non-conventional and non-priority pollutants.
EPA's analyses show the presence of metals and inorganic non-priority pollutants in the
wastewaters. The metals found most frequently include sodium, iron, barium, calcium, manganese,
potassium, iodine, and strontium. Other inorganic, non-priority pollutants frequently detected
include phosphorus, silicon, and sulfur. Non-priority organic pollutants detected in more than 10
percent of the samples collected include 2-propanone, 2-butanone, 1,4-dioxane, and xylenes. In
analyzing for conventional pollutants, an average pH of 8 was observed in the wastewaters.
Exhibit 13-6 provides the pH range observed in the final discharge. EPA, under the Clean Water
Act, regulates all the conventional pollutants and 28 priority pollutants. EPA also regulated all
the 120 pesticide active ingredients under the CWA. However, 95 priority pollutants, and several
non-conventional pollutants are not regulated by CWA because of .the following reasons:
The pollutant has not been detected in the effluent with the use of analytical
methods promulgated pursuant to Section 304(h) of the CWA or other state-of-
the-art methods.
-------
13-9
EXHIBIT 13-6
INDUSTRY SELF-MONITORING pH LEVELS IN FINAL DISCHARGE
3000-
2708
BPT Limit Range
6-9
BIB
0-2 2-4 4-6 6-7 7-8 8-0 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14
pH Ranges
Source: U.S. EPA, 1993 (September), op.dL
-------
13-10
• The pollutant is present only in trace amounts and is neither causing nor likely to
cause toxic effects. In addition, the pollutant is present in amounts too small to be
effectively reduced by technologies known to the Administrator.
• The pollutant is detectable in the effluent from only a small number of sources
and the pollutant is uniquely related to only those sources.
• The pollutant will be effectively controlled by the technologies which are the basis
for controlling certain pesticide active ingredients in the effluent limitations
guidelines and standards.
• There is no treatability data on some of the priority pollutants that would be
expected in the wastewaters from this industry.
• Asbestos is not regulated because there is no promulgated Section 304(h)
. analytical method for asbestos in water.
EPA studies also show that at least some type of treatment is provided to over 99 percent
of the wastewaters discharged directly and to approximately 92 percent of the wastewaters
discharged indirectly. Exhibit 13-7 summarizes the number of facilities using different types of
treatment technology. - . . ;...
13.5 J POTW Report to Congress (RTC)
The 1986 RTC3 indicated that there are 119 facilities with 45 direct dischargers, 38
indirect dischargers; and 25 zero dischargers. The remaining dischargers status was unknown.
The concentrations of underlying constituents present in the. wastewaters discharged from
pesticide manufacturing facilities is provided in Exhibit 13-8. According to these data, many
underlyuSg^riazardous constituents are present at several magnitudes higher than the UTS levels.
.-..-, 13.53 Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
Data from the 199J.BRS.were extracted to determine what types of affected wastes are
generated by the pesticide manufacturing industry. EPA obtained data for the top 25 waste
generators who treated their wastes on site. (See Attachment 13-1 for BRS data.) Five facilities
were selected for follow-up on their BRS data submissions and telephone interviews were
conducted to collect more information on the waste generation and management practices
followed by these facilities. The information obtained is summarized in the telephone logs in
Attachment 13-2. - .
13.5.4 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
EPA has reviewed the TRI and did not Gnd any applicable information for this analysis.
3 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), Report to Congress on the Discharge of Hazardous Waste to Publicly
Owned Treatment Works, Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
-------
13-11
EXHIBIT 13-7
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES USED BY FACILITIES IN THE PESTICIDE INDUSTRY8
Treatment Technology
Biological Treatment '
Carbon Adsorption
Chemical Precipitation/Filtration
Chemical Oxidation
Coagulation/Flocculation
Distillation
Evaporation
Hydrolysis
Incineration
Resin Adsorption . - •
Solvent Extraction
Steam Stripping
Ultraviolet Decomposition '
Number of Facilities
24
12
5
• "... 9
6
2
0
4
3
2
3'
6
_ 2
1 UJS. EPAr4993-(September), op. cit ;—— : —
~ 13.53 Permit Compiianci System (PCS) -
According to the PCS data, 255 direct discharging facilities are in the pesticides category,
and 56 (22 percent) of tnese facilities appear to use land-based units as part of the wastewater
treatment system. (The PCS Jala include-many organic chemical manufacturing facilities, which
explains the high number of facilities compared to the 75 reported in the effluent guidelines
development document). - . "
13.5.6 Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey
The Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey did not include the pesticide manufacturing
industry. Therefore, EPA used data from this survey to calculate the average percentage of land-
based units used across all the industries for which data were available. EPA found that
approximately 12 percent of the faculties in all industrial sectors use land-based units as part of
the wastewater treatment system.
-------
13-12
EXHIBIT 13-8
CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION DATA FOR PESTICIDES INDUSTRY8
Constituent
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane*
1,1-Dichotoroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
2,4,6-Tricnolorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol*
Acetone.
Arsenic
Barium
bis(2-Etnylhexyl) Phthalate
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate'
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform*
Cyanide* .
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate'
Di-n-Octyl Pfithalate*
Diethyl Phthalate
Ethyl Benzene
Methyl Alcohol
Metbylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Phenol'
Toluene
Trichloroethene .
Discharge to POTW (mg/l,
Maximum Concentration)
0.013
0.118
0.01
0.042
0.03
0.83
0.025
0.13
0.5
0.27
0.278
0.038
0.165
3.0
0.124
6.074
0.016
0.015
0.006
0.008
0.02
0.167
0.009
0.002
UTS Concentration (mg/l)
0.054
0.057
0.059
0.21
0.035
0.044
0.28
1.4
1.2
0.28
0.017
0.057
0.046
1.2
0.057
0.017
0.2
0.057
5.6
0.089
0.059
0.039
0.08
0.054
• VJS. EPA, 1986 (February), op. tit
* Concentration exceeds UTS.
-------
13-13
13.5.7 Industry Studies Database (ISDB)
.'
An analysis of the ISDB4 provides ranges of constituent concentrations in the ICR wastes
managed in CWA, SDWA, or CWA-equivalent systems. According to this data, there are 96
facilities in the pesticides industry, and 52 facilities (54 percent) were reported to generate ICR
wastes. These data also indicate that the concentrations of many underlying constituents exceed •
the UTS levels. Exhibit 13-9 provides available data on constituent concentrations of pollutants
present in the wastewaters discharged by the pesticides industry. Many of these constituents are
non-priority pollutants. The ISDB also indicates that eight facilities (approximately 8 percent) in
the pesticides industry manage their ICR wastes in surface impoundments.
13.5.8 Industry Contacts ,
In order to better understand the generation and management of wastewaters in the
pesticide manufacturing industry, EPA contacted staff from different pesticide manufacturing
facilities. These facilities were selected for follow-up on their BRS data submissions and
telephone interviews were conducted to collect more information on the waste generation and
management practices followed by these facilities. None of the facilities contacted reported
. manufacturing pesticides. One facility reported manufacturing pesticides, but this facility also
manufactures organic and inorganic chemicals. This facility reported generating ICRT wastes
that are aggregated with other wastes prior to treatment Exhibit 13-10 summarizes the
information obtained from the industry contacts. Detailed information obtained is summarized in
the telephone logs provided in Attachment 13-1.
13.5.9 Comments to Previous Rules
EPA has reviewed comments to previous rules and did not find any applicable information
for this analysis. .
13.6 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS
• '. • ' •
There are significant data limitations in assessing the extent of the impact of this rule due
to high variability in the waste generation and management practices in this industry. For this
analysis, EPA excluded the 32 facilities that co-treat OCPSF wastewaters with pesticide
manufacturing wastewater, assuming that these facilities will be covered under the OCPSF
industry. Of the remaining 43 facilities, 20 facilities are zero dischargers. EPA estimated the -
number of direct and indirect dischargers, by applying the ratio reported for all 75 facilities. Thus,
EPA estimates that there are 12 direct dischargers and 12 indirect dischargers. One facility which
discharges both directly and indirectly is accounted as two facilities. The average wastewater flow
rate obtained from the effluent guidelines document was used to estimate the quantity of
wastewaters for these 43 facilities. To bridge other data gaps, EPA made assumptions based on
industry knowledge and professional judgement These key assumptions specific to the pesticide
industry are listed below.
4 U.S. EPA, 1994 (November 30), Summary Data from Industry Studies Database for Use in Phase III
Capacity Determinations, Draft, Submitted by Science Applications International Corporation.
-------
13-14
EXHIBIT 13-9
WASTEWATER CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION DATA FOR
THE PESTICIDES INDUSTRY
Chemical Constituent
1,4-Dioxane*
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol*
2,4-Dichlorophenol*
2,6-Dichlorophenol*
Arsenic
Benzene*
Bromoform*
Chloroform*
Chloromethane*
Chromium*
'Cyanide
Ethylbenzene*
Lead*
Methylene Chloride*
Nickel -?
Selenium
Tetrachloroethene
Xylene*
Max. Concentration
(percent)
12E-5
1E-3
82E-3
2E-2
5.8E-5
5.4E-4
5E-3
73E-6
9.17E-5
403E-5
4.3E-5
31E-4
1E-4
3JE-5
1E-5
5E-6
13E-6 :
10.6
UTS Concentration
(percent)
1.2E-5
3.5E-6
4.4E-6
4.4E-6
1.4E-4
1.4E-5
63E-5
4.6E-6
1.9E-5
3.7E-5 , .
1.2E-4
5.7E.6
2.8E-5
8.9E-6
5JE-5
8.2E-5
5.6E-6
3.2E-5
* Concentration exceeds UTS.
Based on the pesticide manufacturing process knowledge, EPA believes that all 43
pesticide manufacturing facilities could generate ICRT wastes that are aggregated
and decharacterized prior to any treatment The ISDB data indicated that 55
percent of the facilities reported generating ICR wastes. Therefore, EPA chose an
average of these values and estimates that approximately 80 percent of the
facilities are likely to generate at least some ICR and TC organic wastes that are
mixed with other wastewaters.
Data on the number of facilities using land-based units vary among different.
sources. For example, the PCS data indicated 22 percent, and the Subtitle D
-------
13-15
EXHIBIT 13-10
SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE LOG FOR PESTICIDES INDUSTRY
Company Name"
Ciba-Geigy
Corporation
ICRT
Wastes
Yes
Land-Based
Units
No
Constituent
Concentrations
above UTS
, Yes
Quantity
Discharged
(tons)
120,696.6
Direct
Discharger
Yes
Indirect
Discharger
No .
Zero
Discharger
No
' * Only one of the facilities contacted.generate pesticides or pesticide wastes.
survey indicated 12 percent, and the ISDB data indicated 8 percent Therefore,
EPA used these data to set the upper bound at 22 percent and the lower bound at
8 percent to estimate the number of facilities with land-based units.
Of the 20 zero dischargers, 7 facilities do not generate ICRT wastewaters, and 3
facilities treat their wastewaters through incineration. These facilities are excluded
from this analysis. The remaining 10 facilities use deep well injection and are not
included in estimating the affected facilities. These are discussed in detail in the
deep well injection section of this report
The ISDB data indicate that several underlying hazardous constituents are present
at higher than UTS levels. Based on this data and process knowledge, EPA
believes that several underlying hazardous constituent are likely to be present at a
level greater than the UTS in all the wastewaters discharged by this industry.
Based on the data reviewed and the above mentioned assumptions, EPA estimates that 2 to 6
facilities are likely, to impacted by today's proposed rule:
-------
BRS 91 Oversia
DATE : 11/15/94
CM t PS Fores (As of 11/94)
Page 1
FUt : INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Nam City
CTDOP1449826 UK 1 ROYAL CHEMICAL CO INC NAUGATUCK
Source Coda . s A19-Cleanlng ft Degreaslng
Fona Code : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : CORROSIVE UASTEUATER FROM CHEMICAL PLANT OPERATIONS;
CM Origin
Page SIC Code point of Measurement
59 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After klx of HU 1 hon-Htf
SULFURIC ACID. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, OTHER ACIDS IN SMALL
1991 Tons
Generated
1.891,371.1
Radio-
active
2-No
Cements
CAS NuBbers
TRI Constituent
QUANTITIES
j 1.0. ALSO 2879
AND COOLING TOMER BLOUDOUN, ONCE-THROUGH COOLING WATER,
II. N125-NEUTRALIZATION, EQUALIZATION, CLARIFICATION
I.F. ALSO A49. A59. A89-COMBINEO PROCESS UASTEWATERS, BOILER
nt>4w n^wt rwr f nwr vwwini>v re\wwi*0v •wnn'i ••••m s»n*f i
SANITARY SEWAGE AND STORM WATER FROM ENTIRE PLANT
i 00062-53-3 00067-64-1
t 3-TRI Constltuent(s)
00075-56-9 00095-47-6 00121-69-7
Onslte Info (Systea/Oty) : Nl25-0ther Trtart/1.891,371.1
Waste Codes : D°02
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Systen
M125-0ther Trtmt 1,891.371.1 / 1.891.371.1 10,654,712.3 / 10,654,712.3 1.886,155.1/0.0
Sec.llI-A. Mew Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
493.6 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description t WWTP FOR TREATMENT OF PROCESS WASTEWATERS. SANITARY SEWAGE. BOILER AND COOLING TOWER SLOWDOWN, ONCE-THROUGH COOLING
WATER. AND STORMWATER FROM CHEMICAL PRODUCTION PLANT.
Cosnent : I.B. NEUTRALIZATION, EQUALIZATION, CLARIFICATION ALSO, I.A. WWTP IS ABBREVIATION FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT
PLANT '
65
NOSI-Energy Recovery 368.4 / 368.4 8,390.4 / 8.390.4
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1991
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status : 03-Penunently Closed
Unit Type : 01-Tank 04-Kiln, Furnace, or Boiler
Description J INCINERATION OF SOLVENTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY IN TWO
INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
-------
BUS 91 OvertIo
DATE J 11/15/94
Flit > 1NDORUN1.RPT
CM i PS Fora (At of It/94)
Page 2
BRS Data for "Pesticides11 Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Uastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
Conaent
CM Origin
City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
: I.C. RCRA REGULATED AND RCRA EXEMPT UNITS WITH ADDITIONAL STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
I.D. t III. D. SYSTEM PERMANENTLY CLOSED 7/91
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
-
OED041212473 STANDARD CHLORINE OF DELAWARE INC
DELAWARE CITY
27 2865 1-On-slte activity 4-After nix of KU A hon-HW
613,714.8 2-No
Source Coda
Font Code
Uastt Description
Consents
CAS Nuabers
TRI Constituent
: A31-0ther than Surface Prep and Finish
: B102-Inorganic Liquid
: PROCESS WASTE HATER CONTAINING BENZENE, MONOCHLOROBENZENE. PARA-DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHOOlCHLOROBENZENE AND TRICHLOROBENZE
NES ••.•-• ' , . • • • ' .
I SECTION I.F. • A53, AS9, A35, A56, A51
:' 3-TRI Constltuent(s)
Onsltt Info (SvsteiB/Qty) t N083-Aqueous Organic Trtat/613.714.8
Uastt Codes : 0018 D021 0027
SECTION I.H. - BIOS
PS Page Systea
1 M039-0ther Recovery
Sec.lll-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1.0 / 0.0
NCM Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
789.0 / 769.0
Future Avail. Code
d.O / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / O.Q
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
11-RCRA
06-Other
10-Tank •'•'.'• '
HYDROOECHLORINATION UNIT; DECHLORINATE DISTILLATION COLUMN BOTTOMS THROUGH VAPOR PHASE REACTOR
SECTION I.B. - VAPOR PHASE REACTOR TO DECHLORINATE STILL BOTTOMS
SECTION I.C. • STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACT SECTION I.D. - PILOf SCALE OPERATION/ON-COINO TESTING
SECTION I.E. • VAPOR PHASE REACTOR SECTION II.E • DUE TO ON-GOING TESTING OPERATION HAS BEEN LI
NITED.
N083-Aojueous Organic Trtnt 613,714.8 / 613,714.8
Sec.lll-A. Hew Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,035,029.2 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
413,714.8 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
242.2 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPOES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1900
-------
> 91 Oversight • CM I PS Foraa (As of 11/94)
r£ | 11/15/94 Page 3
tl t INDPRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 faculties General ing. I CRT Wastes
clllty
Facility
II MBA
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Unit Type . : 01-Tank
Description : WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM CONSISTING OF STEAM STRIPPER. AIR STRIPPING TANK, NEUTRALIZATION TANK, PH ADJUSTMENT TANK.
SAND FILTERS, CLARIFIER AND DECANTING TANK. AND FILTER PRESS
Content :
0051011609 OSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA INC
AUGUSTA
3 2869 1-On-slte activity 1-Before nix
-38,994.0 2-Ho
'Urea Code
>n> Code
iste Description
fleents
tSNiafccrs
(I Constituent.
: A99-Other Processes
: B110-Inorganic Liquid
: ION EXCHANGE REGENERATES FROM BOILER WATER DEMORALIZATION; SODIUM HYDROXIDE.
: l-Ft REGENERATION OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN USING SODIUM HYDROXIDE.
5 - . • • . ' •
: 2-Ho TRI Constituent
i>|t« Info (Systeft/Qty) -s M121-0ther Trtait/38.994.0
>ste Codes : D002
\0051011609 DSH CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA INC
4 2869 1-On-site activity 1-Before nix
32,658.8 2-No
wee Code : A99-Other Processes . .
jf» code i BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
aste Description S ION EXCHANGE REGENERATES FROM BOILER WATER DEMORALIZATION; SULFUR 1C ACID.
oaannts ; I-F: REGENERATION OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN USING SULFUR1C ACID.
AS Nurtwrs : 07664-93-9
Kl Constituent : 3-TRI Const!tuent(s)
nslte Info (Systen/Qty) : N121-0ther TrtBt/32,658.8
aste Codes : 0002
AD051011609 OSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA INC AUGUSTA
ource Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
ora Code : B102-Inorganic Liquid
8 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After nix of HW t non-HU 2,549,956.3 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Overs*
DATE t 1 VIS/9*
CM I PS form (As of 11/94)
Pagi 4
File 1 INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID ••
Facility
Nam
City
CM
Page .SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Waste Description : WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT INFLUENT FLOW.
Cements : .
CAS Hunters : 00071-43-2 00108-88-3
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituents)
Onsjfe |nfo (Systeai/Oty) > M081-Aqueous Organic Trtait/2.549,956.3
W,aste Codes : 0018
10
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Page System
NOSI-Energy Recovery 1,667.6/1,667.6 9,224.3 / 9,224.3 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. Hen Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.5 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status i 01-RCRA ' .
Operational Status s 01-Operational
Unit Type i 04-KIIn,' Furnace, or Boiler'•••
Description : REUSE OF RECOVERED FLAMMABLE ORGANICS AS BOILER FUEL.
Cosnent. : ' ' . •
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtert 2.549.956,3 / 2.549,956.3 . 4,847,364.8 / 4,847,364.8 2.552,336.8 / 0.0
.Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
156.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
unit Type
Description
Coaraent
N12?-0ther Trtait
02-NPDES
01-Operational
01-Tank ••••"'•
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT; ACTIVATED SLUDGE.
1,538,265.9 / 71,652.9
3.783,220.2 / 0.0
1,538.265.9 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
OJ0.0 / 0.01900
Regulatory Status t 02-NPDES . '
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type « 01-Tank ' ,
-------
91 Ovtrtight • OH I PS Fonas (At of 11/94)
:i,i 11/15/94 Page S
.• i INDORUMKRPT
BRS DiU for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 2S Facilities Generating I CRT Uastes
illty
facility
None City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement . Generated
Radio-
active
" Description t NEUTRALIZATION. IYSTEH.
-' Consent .i-.'.';.. . .
005092572 NALCO CHEMICAL CO 8EOFORO PARK 10 2899 1-On-slte activity 4-After *
-------
(S 91 Oversigh. M t PS Fora (As of 11/94)
UI t 11/15/94 Page 6 ..
He I INDdRUNl.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility Facility CM Origin
J Name City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0/0.0 1900
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Consent
01-RCRA
01-Operatlonal
04-Klin, Furnace, or Boiler .
ENERGY RECOVERY FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED AS FUEL IN
H083-Aqueous Organic Trtart 672,527.4/672,527.4
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
INDUSTRIAL BOILER.
672,527.4 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
90.0 / 0.0
. 0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Content
03-POTU
01-Operatlonal
01-Tank
UASTEUATER PRETREATNENT FOR DISCHARGE TO POJTV
rp006370167 B.F. GOODRICH CHEMICAL GROUP CALVERT CITY 35 2869 1-On-site activity (-After Mix of HW t hon-HU 627.652.0 2-No
ource Code .
off Code
taste Description
:oHtnts
:A| Muter*
[Rl Constituent
t A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish •
> 8102- Inorganic Liquid ,
, _ ^ • • - • • , . • .
» ''.'•• ' •' ' ' ' ' . '
s 00056-23-5 00071-43-2 00107-21-1 00108-88'3 07647-01-0 .
: 3-TRI Const Ituent(s) '
Jnilte Info (Systen/Oty) : M083-Aqueous Organic Trt«/627,652.0
Codes : 0028
PS page System Influent (Total/RCRA)
1 M083-Aqueoos Organic Trtart 679,443.1 / 679,443.1
Sec.lll-A. Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
2,191.752.0 / 2,191,752.0
1992
1,095,876.0 / 1,095,876.0 679,443.1 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
• • • 1 ' '
Residual (Total/RCRA)
68.7 / 68.7
-------
S 91 Oversight • CM I PS Fern (As of 11/94)
IE J 11/15/94 Page 7
le : IMDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
•clllty
Facility
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status : 2 -NPDES °':
Operational Status : 1 -Operational
Unit Type j 1 -lank
Description . :
Consent i
H083-Aqueous Organic Trtat 671,487.1 / 671,487.1
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,095,876.0 / 1,095,876.0 671,487.1 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
17.7 / 17.7
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Cement
2 -NPDES
1 -Operational
1 -Tank
H081-Aqueous Organic TrtBt 1,005,203.2 / 333,716.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1.095,876.0/365,000.0 1,005,203.2/0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
2.338.5 / 364.2
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Content
2 -NPDES.
1 -Operational
1 -Tank
2!-Container
N121-0ther Trttrt 839.2 / 839.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status : 8 -Exempt
Operational Status : 1 -Operational
Unit Type : 1 -Tank .
Description : .
Conaent :
H077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtnt 479,896.6/479,896.6
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,095.876.0 / 1.095,876.0 839.2 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
876.700.8 / 876,700.8 479,896.6 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
285.4 / 285.4
0.0 / Q.O
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM i PS Forw (to of 11/94)
DATE s 11/15/94 Page 8
File J INDORUN1.RPT
BUS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
.-
Facility
Nane
•Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Conaent
. City
I -NPDE8
1 -Operational .
1 -Tank.
GN Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
;' I ••'..'•' . •
LA0008080681 OLIN CORPORATION LAKE CHARLES PLANT
UESTLAKE
40 2865 1-On-slte activity 1-Bafore •!«
767.113.0 2-No
i A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: 8102-Inorganic Liquid
: UASTEUATER GENERATED IN TOI/TOA PRODUCTION PROCESSES WHICH CARRY TC CODES (LCU113)
' * ''' ' ' . '
» 00121-14-2
: 3-TRI Constitucnt(s)
Onslte Info (SysteaVQty) i H082-Aqueous Organic Trtnt/767,113.0
Waste Codes : 0030 .
Source Code
For» Code
Waste Description
Contents
CAS Nwfcers
TR| Constituent
LAD008080681 OLIN CORPORATION LAKE CHARLES PLANT
UESTLAKE
t ATB-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trttrt
: 8109-Inorganic Liquid.' , . -
: SPENT SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION FROM TDI CAUSTIC SCRUBBER IN TOI PRODUCTION PROCESS UCU118)
Source Coda
For* Code
Waste Description
Cements :
CAS Hunters :
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
Onslte Info (Systen/Qty) : N082-Aqueous Organic Trtat/4,209.2
Wasta Codes : D002
44 2865 1-On-slte activity 1-Before nix
1.... ... • . ' "
4.209.2 2-No
LA00080M681 OLIN CORPORATION LAKE CHARLES PLANT
Source Code .: A99-Other Processes
UESTLAKE
45 2869 1-On-site activity 1-Before nix
2.486.7 2-No
-------
RS 91 Oversight • GM IPS Fora (As of 11/94)
ATE « 1J/15/94 Page?
ile t IKDORUN1.RPT
BUS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acllity Facility
0 ".'• Maw
ana Code
lasts Description
apwnts '
AS Nu*ers .
R| Constituent
unite Info (SysteaVQty)
ftsta Codes
PS Page Systoa
City
: B109- Inorganic liquid ~
: SPENT SODIUM HYOORXIPE FROM AN ION BED REGENERATION IN
s - ' . . ' '
•
•
i
: 2-No TRI Constituent
: M121 -Other Trttst/2,486.7
. 0002
. Influent (Total/RCRA) Max.
46 N041-lnclneratlon 14,368.0 / 14.368.0 0.0
Sec.lll-A.
Neil Nan. Qper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change Future
GN Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
UATER TREATING FACILITY (LCU119)
\
Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Totai/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
/ 0.0 521,420.0 / 525,420.0 89.3 / 89.3
Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status ': 01 •Operational.
Unit Type : 03-Incinerator
Description : INCINERATION OF LIQUID HAZARDOUS HASTE IN LIQUID INJECTION INCINERATOR.
Cement • ; '
47
K082-Aqueous Organic TrUrt 69,985.1 / 69,985.1
Sec.lll-A. NeM Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Coument .
02-NPDES , •
01-Operational •
01-Tank
GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT OF IDA NETHANOL STILL BOTTOMS UASTEUATER (K1l2)
48
M082-Ac|ueous Organic Trtsit 0.0 / 0.0
See.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
3,200.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1900
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
iRS 91 Oversigh. CM I PS form (As of
>ME I 11/15/94 Past 10
lit t
BRS Data for "Pesticide*" Industry
Top 25 Faculties Generating (CRT Hastes
racility
10 ' ' •'
Facility
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated .
Radio;
active .
50
51
Unit Type i 01-Tank .
Description „ S GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT OF RECOVERED LANDFILL LEACHATE AND GROUKDllATER PRIOR TO DISCHARGE THROUGH NPDES
SYSTEM,. .•"•:•••• '..,.•• ' . • '•
Consent . s • "i ' ... . • .'•••. >.-•...
M082-Ac|ueous Organic Trtart 0.0/0.0 0.0/0.0 4,209.2/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / O.Q
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Consent
02-NPDES . -
01-Operatlonal ' • --
01-Tank :
GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT OF SPENT SODIUM HYDRO XIDE SOLUTION PRIOR TO DISCHARGE THROUGH NPDES SYSTEM.
N082-Aqueous Organic Trt»t 767,113.2 / 767,113.2
Stc.lll-A. Het* Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0/0.0 / 767,113.2/0.0
Future Avail. Code .X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
02-NPDES
01-Operatlonal
01-Tank
GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT OF TC-HAZARDOUS UASTEUATERS PRIOR TO DISCHARGE THROUGH NPDES SYSTEM.
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Consent
MOSI-fnergy Recovery 351.9 / 351.9
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) fear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
.Future Avail. Coda
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
40.5 / 0.0
1900
' Regulatory Status
Operational,Status
Unit Type
Description
Content
52 M121-Other Trtnt
11-RCRA
01-Operatlonal
04-Klln, Furnace, or Boiler
HASTE STREAMS BURNED IN STEAM BOILERS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
2,486.7 / 2.486.7
Sec.lll-A. Net* Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
2,486.7 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
$,486.7/0.0
X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPOES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1900
767.113.2/416.8
0.0 / 0.0
0.0/0.0
-------
91 Oversight • CM I PS Foras (As of 11/94)
t 11/15/9* Page 11
I IHDORUNt.RPT
8RS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
ility
Facility
None
Unit Type
Description
Cement
: 01-Tank .
: NEUTRALIZATION OF
City
SPENT SODIUM
GN
Page
HYDROXIDE SOLUTION PRIOR
SIC
origin
Code
TO DISCHARGE THROUGH
Point of Measurement
NPOEI SYSTEM.
. 1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
M123-0ther Trtait . . 767,113.2/707,113.2
Sec.Ill-A. Hey Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
767,113.2 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
322.7 / 322.7
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
unit type
Description
Content
02-NPOES .
01•Operational
01-Tank -
PRIMARY CLARIFICATION OF TC-HAZARDOUS WASTEUATER GENERATED IN THE TDI/TDA PROCESSES.
04077680? BASF
ret Coda
nCode
to Description
ntnts
Nuabers
Constituent
CORPORATION GEISMAR 15
: A53-One-tree Code : A34-Other"then Surface Prep and Finish
n Code : BlOI-lnorganic Liquid ' .
te Description : WASTEWATERS GENERATED FROM THE MOI PLANT AND ARE CLASSIFIED AS A CHARACTERISTIC WASTE DUE TO IMPLEMENTATION OF TCLP.
mints : SEC IIA THIS WASTE BECAME HAZARDOUS DUE TO IMPLEMENTATION OF TCLP, THEREFORE, 1990 DATA ONLY INCLUDES THE TIME PERIOD OF
SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1990. SEC IVA BASF PLANS TO INSTALL MDI COLLECTION SYSTEM IN 1992.
269.808.2 2-No
-------
BUS 91 Overs I g.
DATE t 11/15/94
fit* t INDORUNl.RPT
at i PS form (As of 11/94)
Page 12
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
CAS Nuaters : 00108-90-7
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constltuent(s)
onslte |nfo (SysteaVQty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtaat/269,808.2
Waste Codes t 0021
PS, Page
3
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
System
N134-0isposai 18,927.3 / 18,927.3 51,840.0 / 51,840.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. Men Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change- Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description <
Conment
04-UIC
01-Operational . .
06-Underground Inj. Well
INJECTION OF 'HAZARDOUS WASTE (D002) VIA INJECTION WELL.
SECTION ID. INJECTION WELL D-2A HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY PLUGGED AND ABANDONED. INJECTION WELL 0-3 IS STILL OPERATIONAL.
SECTION IIB UNIT OF MEASURE FOR OPERATIONAL CAPACITY IS IN GAL/YEAR.
SECTION HE WELL ONLY USED WHEN NEEDED.
M051-Energy Recovery 17,760.7/17,760.7 67,450.0/67,450.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change 'Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status I 01-RCRA
Operational Status i 01•Operational
Description S RECYCLING OF HAZARDOUS (K114, U154, 0001) AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS (ANINE BOILER AND UTILTIES BOILERS 3 AND 6)
FOR ENERGY RECOVERY. .
Cement I SECTION I.E. 4 STORAGE TANKS SECTION I.E. 3 BOILER*
SECTION II A. VALUE FOR DENSITY OF WATER USED IN CALCULATIONS WAS 8.34 LBS/GAL OBTAINED FROM UNIT OPERATIONS AND PROCESS
ES IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REYNOLDS, TOM. BOSTON. MA
H081-Aqueous Organic Trtart 1,713,511.3 / 532,944.1 2,761,718.1 / 2,761,718.1 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. Net* Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
930.0 / 0.0
V 3.945,287.7 / 3,945.287.7
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1994
1
-------
-------
f<$ 91 Oversight
ATE 1 11/15/94
1 A t PS Forms (At of 11/94)
Pig* 14
lit t INDORUN1.RPT
42
44
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acUlty
0
Facility
Nam
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active '
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type i 09-Surfeco
Description t WASTE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY, AER STABILIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
Consent « SEC. II. D WANT IVI RECORDED IN WET WEIGHT.
N051-Energy Recovery 48,616.8/47,013.2 482,383.2/482,383.2 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Cement
43 M043-|nclneratlon
01-RCRA
01-Oparationai
04-JcTln. Furnace, or Boiler 10-Tank
ENERGY RECOVERY IN BOILERS, LIQUID WASTE STREAMS
255.0 / 14.1
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
261.8 / 261.8
' Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type 02-Contalner 03 -Incinerator -
Description ICINERATION OF IGNITABLE, CORROSIVE AND/OR REACTIVE SOLID WASTE
Cement ' ' •
M041- Incineration 11.942.7 / 5,350.4
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
35.068.0 / 35.068.0 0.0 /
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA .
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type : 01-Tank . 04-Klln, Furnace, or Boiler
Description : INCINERATION OF IGNITABLE, CORROSIVE. AND/OR REACTIVE LIQUIDWASTES
Comment :
0.4 / 0.4
98.5 / 0.0
0.9 / 0.0
LAD981149750 UNION TEXAS PRODUCTS CORP. GEISMAR
source Code : ATS-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtnt
Fora Code : B102-Inorganic Liquid
JMte Description t WASTE WATER FROM OLEFINS PROCESS UNIT WHICH CONTAINS BENZENE
4 2869 1-On-slte activity 1-Before nix
729,853.4 2-No
-------
s 91 Oversight • GN I PS form* (As of 11/94)
TE : 11/15/94 Page 15
It ! INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
cility
Facility
UMW
City
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
nsents : 2. A OUANTITU INCLUDES WASTE NENERATED AS NON-HAZARDOUS PRIOR TO SEPT. 25, 1990
S Nutters , 00071-43-2 Q0108-88-3
I Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
.site Info (Systesi/Qty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtait/729,853.4 , '
ste Codes : 0018
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1
M081 -Aqueous Organic Trtit 729,853.4/729,853.4 ; 876,700.8/876,700.8 710,127.6/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
64.9 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-RCRA/HPDES , .
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface lanoundaent •
Description : WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM FOR TREATING.WASTE WATER FROM AN OLEFINS PROCESS UNIT.
Content :
107 2869 1-On-slte activity - 4-After •!* of MU t hon-HW
0002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPWATER
'urce Code : A02-Cleaning I Degreesing
urce Code . : A74-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
108 2869 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-HW
657,600.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Overslgh. CM I PS Form (A* of 11/94)
DATE I 11/15/94 Page 16
Flit l INOORUN1.RPT
BRS bit* for •Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
s 8115-Inorganic Liquid
I WASTE WATER FOAM MANUFACTURING BUILDING
DILUTE !
For* Code
Uattf Description
Cceaenta • ' : •
CAS Nuabers t
' ' ' ' ' • . . • ' . ' '
TRI Constftuent t 2-No TRI Constituent
Onstte Info (System/city) t M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtait/657,600.0
Haste Code* : D002
CORROSIVE LIQUID, CONTAINS TRACE ORGANIES, HYDROCHLORIC AClO
N.J0002385730 E.|. DUPONT-
Source Cod*
f cm Code
(last* Description
Consents
CAS Nunfaers
TRI Constituent
Onsife Info (SystesVQty)
Waste Codes
CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPWATER
» A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
t 8104- Inorganic Liquid
t WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS
: 2-No TRI Constituent
: M091- Aqueous In/Organic Tr tat/657. 600.0
: D002
113 2869 1-On-site activity 3-After nix with non-tM
CORROSIVE LIQUID CONTAINl SULFUR1C ACID
657,600.0 2-No
NJOP02385730 E.I. DUPONT
Source Code
form Code
Wast* Description
Coonents
CAS Nunbers
TRI Constituent
•CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPWATER
s A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
t 8104- Inorganic Liquid
: WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS
: 2-No TRI Constituent
114 2869 1-On-site activity 3-After nix with non-HU
CORROSIVE LIQUID CONTAINS SULFUR1C HTDROHLORlC ACIDS
438,400.0 2-No
-------
US 91 Oversight - CM * PS Forms (As of 11/94)
ATE J 11/15/9* Page 17
lit ! INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acUity Facility
o. ' None
City
6N
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
nslte Info {SystM/Qty) : K091-Aqueous In/Organic Trt*t/438,400.0
aste Codes : 0002
Up002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPWATER
.ource Code : AJ7-Other than Surface Prep and Finish .
on Code : 8102-Inorganic liquid
Jaste Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BLOC. CONTAINS 01SOLVED METH.CHROMIUH, AND LEAD. AND ORGANIC!,
.oawnt* . :
AS Nuabers : 00121-14-2 .
Rl Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
insite Info (Systen/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/1,525.632.0
'aste Codes : 0007 0008 0030 0032 D033
117 2869 1-On-site activity «-After nix of Ml I hon-HW 1,525.632.0 2-No
IJ00023B5730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPWATER
118 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After Mix of NU I hon-HW 87,680.0 2-No
source Code
rora Code
JMH Dtscription
consents
CAS Nwfcers
Kll Constituent
: A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish .
: B102-lnorganic Liquid -
: WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BLDG. CONTAINS 01SOLVED ORGANICS
: 00121-14-2 '
: 3-TRI Constituent(s) .
onslte Info (Systen/Qty) : H091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtnt/87.680.0
Jaste Codes : 0006 0007 0008 0030 0032
4JD002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPWATER
source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Fora Code : 8212-Organic Liquid
121 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After nix of HW t non-HW 54.800.0 2-No
-------
RS 91 Overs I gh j
ATE t 11/15/94
lie t INDORUN1.RPT
t PS Form (As of 11/94)
Page 18
BRS Data for •Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
actlity
o
Facility
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
aste Description : WASTE WATER FROM KAMI. BLDG
oanents • • • : ' ' ,'
AS Numbers. : 00078-93-3 00108-90-7 00121-14-2
HI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
nslte Info (Systea/Qty) i N091-Aqueous In/Organic Trttt/54,800.0
astt Codes : D018 D021 0022 D03Q 0032
JD002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPWATER
122 ; 2869 1-On-slte activity 4-After Mix.of HU t hon-HU
6,578.0 2-No
ource Code
or* Code
raste Description
amenta
AS Nuabert
R| Constituent
: A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: 8102-lnorganlc liquid
: WASTE WATER FROM MANU. BLOC. CONTAINS ACID SCRABBER STEAMS AND 01SOLVED SOLVENTS
: 00121-14-2
: 3-TRI Constitutnt(s)
>nsite Info (Systeo/Oty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtrt/6,578.0
lute Codes : 0002 0007 0008 0030 :
IJD00238S730 E.I. OUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPIMTER
source Code t A27-Surface Prep and Finish
form Code : B212-0rganic Liquid
'aste Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANU. BLDG. CONTAINS ACID WASTES AND
.otnents :
ASNuObers : 00071-43-2 00121-14-2
rRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Unite Info (System/Oty) : H091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/657,600.0
123 2869 1-0n-s
-------
3S 91 Oversight • CM I PS form (As of 11/94)
ATE : 11/15/94 Page 19
ill s INJDOaUNI.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acillty Facility
D •' Naoe
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Point of Neasurenent
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
fatte Codes
: 0002 0008 0019 0021 0026
E.I. pUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPUATER
.ource Code : A19-Cleaning ft Degress Ing
oral Code : B114-Inorganic Liquid •
last* Description > WASTE WATER FROM NANU. BLDQ. CONTAINS DISOLVED SOLVENTS, HETALS CHROMIUM «• LEAD
aments : ,...
:AS. Niflbers : • '' • . . ' - '.
R| Constituent t 2-No TRI Constituent
insite Info ^ystoa/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic TrUrt/175,360.0 •
faste Codes : 0001 0007 0008
12S 2869 1-On-slte activity 4-After m\* of HW ft hon-HU
175,360.0 2-No
UPOOZ385730 E.I. OUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPWATER
iource Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish.
rorp Code • . . : B114-lnorganic Liquid , ' •
Jaste Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BLDGS. CONTAINS 01SOLVED ORGANICS AND METALS
127 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW t non-HW
219.200.0 2-No
CAS Hubert : DK • -
fRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
oralte Info (System/oty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/219,200.0
Uaste Codes . : 0001 0007 0008
HJ0002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPUATER
Source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and.Finish
fora Code : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
Uaste Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING, CONTAINS DISOLVED ORGANICS AND ACIDS
128 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After nix of HW t non-HW
175,360.0 2-No
-------
RS 91 Oversight
ATE I 11/15/94
lit I INOORUN1.RPT
J* t PS Fom (As of 11/94)
Page 20
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acUity
0
Facility
Dana
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
nts • . ' > • '
AS NuBbers : 00056-23-5 00071-43-$
81 Constituent i 3-TRI Constltuent(s) ' . ,
insitf Info (Systep/Qty) i M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtiat/175,360.0
last* Codes : t 0007 0001 0002 :
IJ0002385730 E.I. OUPONT- CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPUATER
.ource Code
or* Code
taste Description
:oBBents
AS Hunters
;RI Constituent
: A37-Other than Surface Prep and F.inlsh -
t B102-Inorganic Liquid
S WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BLOCS CONTAINS DISOLVED
130 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After m\* of HU 1 hon-HU
ORGAN ICS
383,600.0 2-No
! 00121-14-2
i 3-TRI Coratltuent(s)
msite Info (Systen/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtait/383,600.0
lastt Codes : 0001 0030 0032 0033
IJD002385730 E.|. OUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPWATER
131 2869 1-On-site activity 3-After «lx Mith non-NW
1,468,640.0 2-No
iourca Coda
i-oni Code
Jaste Description
consents
CAS NUgfwrs
ril constituent
: ATB-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtait ,
t BIOS-Inorganic Liquid . •
t WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING CONTAINS HYDROCHLORIC AND METALS DISSOLVED
J
: 2-No TRI Constituent
onsite Info (Systen/Qty) : H091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtat/1,468,640.0
J«ste Codes .. : 0002
-------
91 Oversight • GN t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
: 11/15/94 Page 21
.• ; INDpRUNl.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
ility
Facility
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
102385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPUATER
134 2869 1-On-slte activity 4-After nix of HW I non-HU
113.984.0 2-No
ret Code
.a Code
te Description
.nents ' •
Nuifcers
Constituent
: A51-0ne-tlme t Intermit. Process
: 8101-lnorganic liquid • •' '
: UASTE WATER FROM NANU. CONTAINS ORGAN I CS AND DISSOLVED
METALS
: 2-No TRI Constituent
ite Info (System/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtnt/113,984.0
te Codes , : 0001 . D007 0008
002385730 E.I. DUPONT
irce Code . • ..
n Code •
te .Description
nents
, Nurfxrs
i Constituent
ilte Info (Systen/Qty)
ite Code»
CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPUATER
: ASI-One-tine I Intermit. Process
: 8101-Inorganic Liquid
: WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING
: 2-No TRI Constituent
: M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/105,218.0
; 0001
135 2869 1-On-site activity 3-After BJK with non-HU
105,218.0 2-No
J002385730 E.I. DUPONT
jrce Code
rajCode '• •
ste Description
iwents
S Ninbers
CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPWATER
: AS1-One-tine t Intermit. Process
: B101-Inorganic Liquid
; WASTE WATER FROM MANUFACTURING BLOCS
136 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU t non-HU
21,920.0 -2-No
-------
-------
; 91 Oversight.- CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
fE : 11/15/94 Page 23
It : INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
dUty facility CM Origin
Nane . . City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
m Code : BllO-lnorganlc Liquid
ste Description : WASTE WATER FROM NADU. BLOCS CONTAINS CAUSTIC WASTES.
onents : . ...... ^ ^
S (haters • : ; • . ' . ,.,, '''.••':..
1 Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent " :
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
site Info (Systep/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/219.200.0
ste Codes : P002
0002385730 E.I. OUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS DEEPWATER
uree Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish ,
rp Code • .' : 8114-lnorganic Liquid
ste Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANU. BLOCS, CONTAINS ACID (SULFURIC)
nnents ~ • : ' •••'... ,
.S NuHbers . : ' ^ ' .
I Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
.site Info (Systen/Qty) : H091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/219,200.0
iste Codes : 0002 ' .
146 2869 1-oh-site activity J-After •(« with non-HU
219,200.0 2-No
I0002U5730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPWATER
147 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After nix of HU t non-HU 548,000.0 2-No
>urce Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
iraCode : BIH-lnorganic Liquid
istt Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANU. BLOCS
agents ; WASTE WATER FROM MANU. BLOCS
*S Umbers : 00107-06-2
(I Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
-------
,RS 91 Overs!ghv 41 PS Form (As of 11/94)
ATE I 11/15/94 page 24
Ut I INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility Facility
0 Nam f
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
Jnfo (Systea/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtist/548,000.0
'aste Codes ; 0008 0028 -
IJD002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS
DEEPUATER
148 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of NW * hon-HU 548,000.0 2-Mo
ource Code
taste Description
amenta
AS, Hunters
R| Constituent
: A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
t Bl14-lnorganlc Liquid
: WASTE WATER FROM KAMI. BLOCS
: 00071-43-2 00107-06-2
: 3-TRI Constltuent(s)
oslte Info (Systeo/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtpt/548,000.0
a«te Codes i 0008 0018 0028
J0002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPWATER
ource Code > A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
orp Code . i B114-Inorganic Liquid
aste Description : WASTE WATER FROM MANU. BLOCS. CONTAINS ACID AND.DISSOLVED METALS
oments • i .... . . . -
AS Nufeers :
Rl Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
nslte Info (System/Qty) : M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/548,000.0
'aste Codes : : D002 0007 0008
149 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU t non-HU
548,000.0 2-No
JD002385730 E.I. DUPONT-CHAMBERS WORKS OEEPWATER
ource Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
ora Code : B113-Inorganic Liquid
151 2869 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of NW t hon-HU
876,800.0 2-No
-------
iS 91 Oversight • OH * PS Foraa (As of 11/94)
iTE : 11/15/94 Pa8e25
ilt ; INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
icility
Facility
Nam
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
«te Description : WASTE WATER FROM SERVICE FACIL CONTAINS LIME * VARIOUS
QBBents : .
AS Nuabers : 00071-43-2 00107-06-2 00121-14-2
HI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
nsjte Info (Systen/Qty) : H091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtatt/876,800.0
faste Codes : 0002 0008 0018 0028 0030
ORGANICS + METALS
PS Page System
116
M014-Hetals Recovery
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
2,206.0 / 0.0
(Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
10,500.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
20,500.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.6 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 10-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 10-Tank
Description I FR-6S IS A THERMAL TREATMENT FACILITY FOR USE IN STRESS
RESIDUAL ORGANIC MATERIAL ON NON COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS
Comnt : I-B THERMAL TREATMENT TO REMOVE ORGANIC CONTAMINANT I-C
SCRAP METAL EXEMPTION. I-E THERMAL OVEN.
RELIEVING METAL EQUIPMENT AND THERMAL DESTRUCTION OF
HAS BEEN OPERATING UNDER INTERIM PART B PERMIT. QUALIFIES
117
M021-Solvents Recovery
Sec.lll-A. Men Max. Oper.
2.198.697.0 / 2.198.697.0
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
3,287,628.0 / 3,287.628.0 2,189,124.0 / 2.189,124.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
9,573.0 / 9,573.0
N 0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
1900
Unit Type
Description
Connent '
118 M041-lncineration
01-Tank 04-Kiln, Furnace, or Boiler
: LEAD PRE TREATMENT FACILITY TREATS WASTES FROM REMEDIATION AND MANUFACTURE. WASTE CONTAINS 0008 AND C306. TREATMENT
CONSISTS OF DISTILLATION TO REMOVE ORGANICS LEAD, CHEMICAL..
; I-B ALSO N-021, M-032, M042, M077, M101, M013. I-E FURNACE IS A SLUDGE DRYER II 0 MADE UP AS FOLLOWSl LEAD PRESS CAKE.
6376 TONS: HEAD FURNACE SLAG, 1290: E SUMP SLUDGE 1103; LEAD MELT POT SLAG, 75; LEAD. RUST AND SCALE, 67; AND LEAD
FLUE OUST 662 TONS. THERE WASTES ARE SHIPPED OFF SITE FOR LEAD RECOVERY. II F INVOLVLES RESIDUE FROM FR-6S TAHtNATION
OF TANKS RETURNED FROM CUSTOMERS WHICH HAVE BEEN IN MOTOR FUEL ANTIKNOCK CUPD. USE
5,270.0 / 727.0
.Sec.lll-A. Hen Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
7.100.0 / 2,364.0
Future Avail. Code
1.058,616.0 / 146,036.0
X Future Capacity
O.t / 0.0
-------
-------
TE :' 11/15/94 Page 27
i If > INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
icflity
> .
' Facility
None
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin •
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
-------
US 91 Overslgh
ATE i 11/15/94
lie : INDORUN1.RPT
1 I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Pagt 28
8RS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acillty
0
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description. ' •
Comnent
OS-Exempt
XD0008364B6 ISK BIOTECH CORP./GREENS BAYOU PLANT HOUSTON
4 2879 5-Residual
a-Unknown
iource Code
ora Code
laste Description
:ojHnents
AS Niflbers
iRI Constituent
: A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trttrt
: B102- Inorganic Liquid
: WASTEVATER, PROCESS
: 8-UnknoMn
msltt Info (Systen/Qty) : NOBS-Aqueous Organic Trtnt/1.235.007.2 Nl21-0ther Trtmt/1,235,007.2
11 H123-0ther Trt«/1,235,007.2 H124-0ther Trtnt/1,235,007.2
Jaste Codes
t 0019 D032
1,235,007.2 2-No
rXDOQ0836486 ISK BIOTECH CORP./GREENS BAYOU PLANT HOUSTON
5 2879 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
: ATB-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
:-B109-Inorganic Liquid
• ,
: SCRUBBER SOLUTION, SPENT (SODIUM HYDROXIDE)
source Code
FODS Code
Jaste Description
consents :
CAS Hunters :
FRI Constituent : 8-Unknonn
Oralte.Info (Systen/Oty) : H121-0ther Trtnt/4,383.5
Codes : 0002
4,383.5 2-No
rXD000836486 ISK BIOTECH CORP./GREENS BAYOU PLANT
HOUSTON
7 2879 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
2,628.0 2-No
-------
; 91 Oversight • GN I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
fE i 11/15/94 Page 29
1« : INDORUN1.RPT .
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Uastes
cillty Facility
Name • ,
urce Code
naCode
ste Description
intents
s Umbers
1 Constituent
CM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
City Page SIC ' Code Point of Measurement Generated active •
: A49-Other than Surf ace Prep and Finish . .
: BlOI-lnorganlc Liquid
: UASTEUATER CONTAINING ORGAN ICS
: • '
•-.•' . . i
: 8-UnknoNn . •
site Info (Systen/Oty) ; N123-0ther Trt«t/2,628.0
ste Codes : D001 D019 0032
Pjl Page System
190 N085-Aqueous Organic Trtnt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Totat/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 1,233,526.4
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : •
Description :
Connent : '
0.0./ 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X.Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0001913381 CHEVRON CHENI
uret Code ' ;
•rm Code
>ste Description
menta
>S Hunters
(I Constituent
isite Info (System/Qty)
CAL CCNPANT, CEDAR BAYOU PL BAYTOWN . 1 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown 986,288.4 2- Ho
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtut ' •
B102- Inorganic Liquid
UASTE UATER. INDUSTRIAL CONTAINS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
B- Unknown ' .
H081 -Aqueous Organic Tr trot/986, 288. 4
-------
S 91 Oversighv
*TE : 11/15/9*
ilt : INDORUN1.RPT
4 • PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 30
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
iclllty
>
iste Codes
Facility
Kane
: 0018
CM
City Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement Generated
Radio-
active
PS Page System
52 M081-Aqueous Organic Trtat
• Sec.lll-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 986,288.4
Neti Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
unit Type
Description
Comment
02-NPDES
XD008079642 DU PONT SAB1NE RIVER WORKS
ORANGE
1 2869 1-On-site activity B-Unknowi
142,850.8 2-No
: A32-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: B110-Inorganic Liquid
: CORROSIVE WASTES
ource Code
ora Code
aste Description
onaents :
AS Numbers : '
Rl Constituent : 8-unkiwun
insitt Info (Systen/Qty) : M134-Dlsposal/78,571.9 >
Jastt Codes : 0002 0003 0018 0023 0024 0025 0026 0001
IXDOOB079642 DU PONT SABINE RIVER WORKS
ORANGE
3 2869 1-On-slte activity 8-Unknowi
1,045,080.6 2-No
>ource Code
form Code
vaste Description
^oraents
CAS Hunters
: A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
: WATER, CONTAMINATED
-------
n Oversight
: 11/15/9*
: INDORUN1.RPT
GM t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 31
BftS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Uastes
uty
Facility -
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active '
Constituent : 8-Unknown
te Info (Systcn/Qty) : M134-Disposal/1,031,891.0
e Codes : 0001 0002 000$ 000* 0005 0006 0007 0008 0009 0010 0011 0012 0013 D014 0019 0016 001? DOld 0019 0020 0021 0022 0023 0024
Page
~JO~~
11
12
System Influent (Total/RCRA)
H041-lncineration . 0.0 / 142.837.4
Sec.III-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type . : •
Description :
Ccanent t . .
H042-lncineration 0.0 / 18,825.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA , /
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description , :
Coonent s
WW2-Incineration .0.0/1.045.073.6
Sec.lll-A. H«M Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 07-RCRA/UIC .
Operational Status : ;
Unit Type :
Description :
Coament : '
MOAZ-lnclneration 0.0 / 21.0
Sec.lll-A. Hen Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Future Aval I. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0/0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0/0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity •
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
MS 91 Overs (9.
PATE : 11/15/94
CM t PS Forts (As of 11/94)
Page 32
file : IWIORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
' ' . '•
Facility
Name
.0.0 '/
Regulatory Status
>
0.0
01 -ROM
' ' '. '• V ' • -CM
City Page SIC
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Operational Status
Unit Type
. Description
Cojnuent
^ Mitt-Disposal 0.0/117.1
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
. Unit Type
Description
Comment
15 M041-Incineration 0.0/24.7
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Garment
16 M041-lnclneratlon 0.0/17.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Coninent
17 H042-Incineration 0.0/686.6
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
' ' 0.0/0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0/0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0,0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
; 91 Oversight - CM I PS Foros (As of 11/94)
IE : 11/15/94 Page 33
le : INOORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
:illty Facility
Kane'
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status': ' • .
Unit Typo : •
Description :
Cement : •
18 M042-lncineration 0.0 / 7,418.9
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description : ', .
Cement :
19 M132-Dispo»al 0.0 / 12.6
Sec.lll-A. NeH Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : Of-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description :
Cqnment ' :
ZQ N078-Aqueous Inorganic Trwt ' 0.0 / 169.5
Sec.|ll-A. New Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : •
Description :
Cement :
21 N042-Incineration 0.0/191.3
Sec.lll-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
i O.O/ 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.6 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0,0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0/0.0
. X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 /O.O
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
RS 91 Overs I g».
ATE t 11/15/94
tit : INOORUN1.RPT
GN I PS Forta (At of 11/94)
Pagi 34
22
23
24
25
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acllity
ID -' '
Facility
Name
City .
OH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
. Generated
Radio-
active •
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M042-incineretion 0.0 / 0.4
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA •
' Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comnent
H042-Incineration 0.0 / 0.3
Sec.lll-A. NCM Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comnent
M042-lnclneration 0.0 / 32.S
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0/0.0 0.0/0.0
Future Avail. Code . X Future Capacity
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : •
Unit Type : -
Description : . .. -
Comnent :
H042-lncineratlon 0.0/1.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
IRS 91 Oversight
JATE : 11/15/94
,ile : IHOORUN1.RPT
CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 35
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
(XD008092793 OOU CHEMICAL
source Code '
form Code
Waste Description
Consents '
CAS Hunters
r*l Constituent
onslte Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
rXD008092793 OOU CHEMICAL
Source Code
form Code
Waste Description
Consents
CAS Hunters
Til Constituent
Onslte Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
U.S.A. FREEPORT 2 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
: A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: B113-lnorganlc Liquid .
: UASTEUATER, ALKALI HE PROCESS
: •' .
: . • :
: 8-Unknown
: M029-Solvents Recovery/3,020,639. 1 N083-Aqueous Organic Tr tat/1, 725, 885.9
M121 -Other Trtat/1.396.2 ,
: 0002 ',,'•'
U.S.A. FREEPORT 3 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
: A49-Other than Surface ?fep and Finish , "
: B102- Inorganic Liquid ...
: UASTEUATER
• • ' '
• - ; .
* '
: BrUnknoun . . •
: M029-Sol vents Recovery/31,300.3" M081- Aqueous Organic Trtmt/483.6
H083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/140, 511.0 MOBS -Aqueous Organic Trtmt/47,474.5 M121 -Other Trtmt/2, 669,000.0
: 0018 0019 0020 0021 0022 D023 D024 0025 0026 0027 0028 0029 0030 0031 0032 D033 b034 D03J 0036 D037
4,748,055.2 2-Mo
3.145,796.5 2-No
0038 0039 0040 0041
PS Page System
. 53 'M042-Incineration
Influent (Totai/RCRA)
6.0 / 2.1
Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Residual. (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
-------
8RS 91 Overs Igh. GN i PS forms (Ac of 11/94)
DATE : 11/'5/9* Page 36
File t INOQRUN1.RPT
BRS Data- for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name City
Sec.tll-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
CM Origin
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
Future Aval I . Code X Future Capacity
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
54 8083-Aqueous Organic Trt*t 0.0 / 1,725.886.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
"~~ 0.0 / 0.0~
Regulatory Status 02-NPDES •
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
55 M121-Other Trtrot 0.0 / 1.396.2
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0 '.
Regulatory Status 02-NPDES
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Copment
56 N029-Solvents Recovery 0.0 / 3.020.639.0
Sec.lll-A. New Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
"0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : .
Unit Type :
Description : . (|
eminent :
0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0/0.0 0.0/*.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0^0 / 0.0 . 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
57 M.042-Incineration
0.0 / 45.5
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
; 91 Oversight • CN I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
if. : 11/15/94 Page 41
te : INDORUM1.RPT
76
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
:llity Facility
' ' ';;' ' Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
• Description
Coonent
CM Origin
City Page SIC Code
01-RCRA
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement - Generated active
M042-Incineration O.Q / 164.8
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
01-RCRA
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Content
N042-lnctneration Q.O / 0.1 3
Sec.lll-A. Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : •
Unit Type : -
Description .:
Content ' : • •
H042-lnclneration 0.0 / 2,532.9
Sec.lll-A. Neu Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA . -
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description : . •.
Coonent : . .
H051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 5,118.7
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
•Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversl>..
DATE t 11/15/94
file : INOORUH1.RPT
CM t PS Fom (As of 11/94)
Page 42
78
60
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID '
Facility
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Operational Status t -
Unit Type : -
Description i
Consent :
H051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 6,542.7 (
Sec.lll-A. He* Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Cement
H042-lnctneration 0.0/1.6
Sec.lll-A. Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
•Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Content
M042-lhcineration 0.0 / 45.7
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
H042-Incineration 0.0 / 8.947.5
Sec.lll-A. Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
d.O / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
;l Oversight - CM I PS Foras (As of 11/94)
: 11/15/94 Page 43 '
: IMOORUN1.RPT
82
8?
84
85
BRS Oats for "Pesticides'? Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
If'ty .Facility . , • ' '
Nam
GN
City .' Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement . Generated
Radio-
active
Unit Type : - ' :
Description :
Coment : '
K051-Energy Recovery .. 0.0/2,500.0
Sec.lll-A. Hen Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0 ,
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA !
Operational Status : • •;
Unit Type : •
Description : ,
Coment : !
MOSI-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 3,326.8
Sec.lll-A. Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
~ 0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : •
Unit Type . : - .
.Description :
Coment :
M051 -Energy Recovery 0.0 / 4,918.3
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0 ~~
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
. Operational Status : - ' . •
Unit Type : -
Description :
Coment :
M051 -Energy Recovery 0.0 / 28,346.6
Sec.lll-A. Neu Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : •
Unit Type : •
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
.0.0 / 0.0 ;
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 /O.O
X Future Capacity
o.o / o!o
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Overs i 9 CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 44
File : INDORUN1.RPT
Facility Facility
ID Name
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
CM Origin
City Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement ' Generated active
Description : .
Comnent : • •
86
87
89
M042-lncineration 0.0 / 31.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : r
Unit Type : •
Description :
Comnent :
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 3,560.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type ' :
Description :
Comnent • :
M051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 2,874.8
Sec.lll-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comnent :
M042-lncineration 0.0 / 232.9
Sec.III-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
01-RCRA
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
b.O / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future 'Capacity
d.O / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
, 91 Oversight • CM 4 PS forms (As of 11/94)
E : 11/15/94 Page 45
e : INDORUN1.RPT
ility Facility
Name
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
CM Origin
City Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active .
90
91
92
93
Comment :
H042- Incineration 0.0/42.5
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :. •
Description . :
Comment :
M051-Energy Recovery 0.0/3,824.2
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type . :
Description :
Comment : .
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 0.0 /.1.9
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : • .
Unit Type : - .
Description :
Comment :
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 311.2
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operatt6nal Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
i3RS 91 Oversight J4 & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 46
File : INDORUN1.RPT
Facility Facility
ID Name
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
GM Origin
City Page SIC Code
•
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
94
95
96
97
M132-Dlsposal 0.0 / 88.6
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Qper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 87.3
Sec.III-A. NeU Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
M042-lncineration 0.0 / 1,079.5
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
.Comment :
N132-Dlsposal 0.0 / 9B9.9
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0 .
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
d.O / 0.0
X Future Capacity
6.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
91 Oversight
. : 11/15/94
.- : INDORUN1.RPT
CM 4 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 47
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
98
99
100
101
M051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 10,846.0
Sec.lll-A. Net* Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : •
Description : >
Comment :
H042-Incineration 6.0 / 141.5
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : •
Unit Type : -
Description :
'Connent •
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 82.5
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0,0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type . : -
Description :
Comment .. : '
M042-lncineration 0.0 / 130.1
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : •
Description ' :
Comment :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail; Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
102 Ml32-Disposal
0.0 / 2,376.9
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
8RS 91 Oversigh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : INDORUN1.RPT
X & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 48
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
103
104
105
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status •: 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
M042- Incineration 0.0/0.1
Sec.!!I-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : - ~
Description :
Comment :
M132-Dlsposal 0.0 / 2.1
Sec.MI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
H132-0isposal 0.0 / 45.8
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : - •
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
106 M042-Incineration
0.0 / 12.6
0.0/0.0 0.0/0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0 . 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0,0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
91 Oversight
£ : 11/15/94
e : INDORUN1.RPT
GN « PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 49
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
ility
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
107
108
109
110
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : - . .
Description : • ' . .
Comment :
N132-Disposal ' . 0.0 / 136.7
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0;0 t.
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
H042-Incineration Q.O / 90.3
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
tonment :
M042-lncineration 0.0 / 17.8
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
H042-Incineration 0.0 / 833.9 .
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future AvaiI. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
. 0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
S VI overs igi. m * KS rorms ins or n/w*
TE : 11/15/94 ^ Page 50
le : INDORUN1.RPT
•cllity Facility
J Name
1
BRS Data for "Pesticides". Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
GN ' Origin
City Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
111
112
113
114
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : • .
Unit Type : •
Description :
Comnent :
H132-0lsposal 0.0/4,910.1
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change.
0.0 /. 0.0 ,
1
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : •
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comnent :
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 1.8
Sec.lll-A. New Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
• 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comnent :
N042-Incineration 0.0 / 30.2
Sec.lll-A. New Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comnent :
N042-Incineration 0.0 / 18.1
Sec.lll-A. New Nax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.07 0.0
-------
; 91 Oversight - CM 4 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
fE : 1 VIS/94 Page 51
le :' INOORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
:ility Facility
. Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
115
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA .
Operational Status : - . , .
Unit Type :
Description :
Cooment : .
M042-incineration 0.0/30.2 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
'008123317 DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
VICTORIA
2 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
882,053.0 2-No
tree Code
.« Code
. ;te Description
..nents
i Numbers
(I Constituent
;ite Info (System/Qty)
;te Codes
A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid -
BRINES, CYANIDES, HEAVY METALS AND DISSOLVED ORGANICS
8-Unknown
M134-D1sposal/885.028.0
0002 0003 D018 0026
J008123317 DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO. VICTORIA
irce Code : A31-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
rra Code : BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
;te Description : ACID, AQUEOUS AND DISSOLVED ORGANICS CONTAMINATED
.intents :
3 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
3,029,705.0 2-No
-------
(S 91 Oversigh ,
*TE : 11/15/94
ile : INDORUN1.RPT
I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 52
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
icility
.)
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
S1C
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
AS.Numbers :
,
-------
91 Oversight - CM * PS Forms (As of 11/94)
,: : 11/15/94 Page 53
.- : INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
ility Facility
Name
Sec.lll-A.
City
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
CM
Page SIC
Future Avail. Code
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
X Future Capacity
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
. Comnent :
44 M051 -Energy Recovery : 0.0/1,799.9
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
46 M051-Energy Recovery 0.0/25,714.6
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
47 M051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 196.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : - .
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment t
0.0 / 0.0 •
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
M051-Energy Recovery
0.0 / 1,546.6
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
. 91 OversIgh
fE : 11/15/94
te : IKDORUN1.RPT
J4 ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 54
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
-lilt)
f Facility
Name
Sec.lII-A.
New Max. Oper.
(Total/RCRA)
City
Year of -Change
CM
Page
Future Avail.
SIC
Code
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
X Future Capacity
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment : -
49 M132-Disposal ' 0.0 / 14.2
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
50 M132-Dlsposal 0.0 / 0.3
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status: :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
51 M132-Dlsposal 0.0 / 200.9
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
.Unit Type : •
Description :
Comment : .
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0 d.O / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
XD041515420 SEADRIFT/UNION CARBIDE CHEN & PLASTICS N. SEADRIFT
3 2869- 5-Residual
8-Unknown
7,589.4 2-No
-------
91 Oversight
c : 11/15/94
e : INDORUN1.RPT
CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 55
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
ilfty Facility
Name
rce Code
m Code
te Description
flients
. Numbers
Constituent
.ite Info (System/Qty)
te Codes
CM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
City . Page . SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated ' active
A79-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B1 16- Inorganic. Liquid • • • . . . .
UATER, RUNOFF FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
8-Unfcnown
MOBS-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/7. 589.4
0018 .
041515420 SEADRIFT/UNION CARBIDE CHEN I PLASTICS N. SEADRIFT
5 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknoun
834,000.0 2-No
irce Code
in Code
.te Description
merits
. Nunbers
i Constituent
Hte Info (System/Qty)
:te Codes
ATS-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B102-Inorganic Liquid
WATER. FURNACE WATER
8-Unknown
NOBS-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/834,000.0
0018
.)041515420 SEADRIFT/UNION CARBIDE CHEN I PLASTICS N. SEADRIFT
17 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
39.7 2-No
jrce Code
rm Code
ste Description
unents
S Numbers
I Constituent
: A59-One-time I Intermit. Process
: B219-0rganic Liquid
: IGNITABLE WASTES
: 8-Unknown
-------
RS 91 Oversigl
ATE : 11/15/94
He : INDORUN1.RPT
JN & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 56
BRS Data for "Pesticides11 Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Uastes
acil.ity
0
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
nsite Info (System/Qty) : MDBS-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/3.3 M132-Dlsposal/1.3
aste Codes : 0001
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
XD050309012 AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY - CHOCOLATE BAYOU ALVIN
1 2869 1-On-site activity B-Unknown
: A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtnt
: B102-Inorganic Liquid
: WASTEWATER CONTAINING ORGANICS
;ource Code
, orm Code
Jaste Description
:omnents :
AS Numbers :
iRI Constituent : 8-Unknown
insite Info (System/Qty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/8,243,256.0
taste Codes : D018
8,243,256.0 2-No
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
tffluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
rX0058275769 LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY
CHENNELVIEU
1 2869 1-pn-site activity 8-Unknowrt
: A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: B114-Inorganic Liquid
: UASTEUATER, INDUSTRIAL PROCESS(DOHESTIC-INDUSTRIAL GRADE)
iource Code
form Code .
/aste Description
Comnents :
CAS Numbers :
fRI Constituent : 8-Unknoun
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/2,812,521.7
Waste Codes : D002 0018
2,823,780.7 2-No
-------
,S 91 Oversight - CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
JE : 11/15/94 Page 57
. le : INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
.cilitv Facility
> Name
CM Origin
City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
0056275769 LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY CHENNELVIEU 4 2869 1-On-site activity 8-Unknoun
>urce Code
irm Code
iste' Description
-------
:S 91 Oversight j
JE : 11/15/94
ile : INOORUN1.RPT
I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 58
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
iciiity
i>
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated.
Radio" .
active
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Coonent :'
.(0083472266 ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANV/CHANNELVIEW
CHANNELVIEU
1 2869 1-On-site activity B-Unknown
1,774,654.0 2-No
jurce Bode
,arm Code
jste Description
jonents
AS Numbers
.,
-------
91 Oversight • GN & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
£.: 11/15/94 Page 59
WASTEWATERS .
SEC I.F- COMBINED PROCESS WASTEWATERS FROM THE MANUFACTURE OF CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES
2-No TRI Constituent
M121-Other Trtnt/3,150,000.0 .-•'..
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
3,150,000.0/3,150,000.0 4,200,000.0/4,200.000.0 3.150,000.0/0.0
Sec.II!-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
1900
-------
,RS 91 Overslgl. ,
•ATE : 11/15/94
. He : INDdRUNI.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 60
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
, acility Facility
<0 '. Name
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type 01 -Tank
Description TANK NEUTRALIZATION OF
Coniucnt
2 M021 -Sol vents Recovery 80.4 / 80
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
City
PLANT UASTEUATERS
Year of Change
CM
Page SIC
500.0 / 500.0
Future Avail. Code
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
1M / 0.0
X Future Capacity
1991 Tons
Generated
0.0 / 0.0
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : DISTILLATION UNIT TO RECLAIM SPENT SOLVENT GENERATED FROM PILOT LAB OPERATIONS
Comnent : SEC I.C- NOT REGULATED UNDER RCRA RECYCLING UNIT SEC II.C- APPROXIMATELY 126,000 LBS OF SOLVENT RECLAIMED AND
SOLD FOR REUSE
-------
ATTACHMENT 13-1
TOP 25 FACILITIES REPORTING ICRT WASTES IN THE BRS
-------
BUS vi uversignt • on & PS forms (AS or
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 37
File : INDORUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
58
59
60
61
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : •
Description : ' .
Comment :
MOBS-Aqueous Organic Trtrat 0.0 / 44,975.5
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 483.6
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change'
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 02-NPOES
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M1Z1-Other Trtrat 0.0 / 2,669,000.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) .Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPOES .
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description ' :
Comment :
M029-Solvents Recovery 0.0 / 28,551.4
Sec.III-A; New Max..Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
O.d / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.() / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : INDORUN1.RPT
JM & PS Forms (As .of 11/94)
Page 38
BRS Data for'"Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
62
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05<-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status :
Unit Type : •
Description :
Comment :
M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0/140,511.0
Sec.lil-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change.
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description : '
Comnent ' ' .
M085-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 2,499.0
Sec.IM-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status ! 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comnent :
M121-Other Trtmt 0.0 / 2,748.9
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : OS-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment : •
H042-Incineration 0.0 / 210.2
See.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
' 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
.0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail; Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
"0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
S 91 Oversight
fE : 11/15/94
,le : INDORUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 39
66
67
68
69
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
cility
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
\0rigin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated.
Radio-.
active
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : .
Unit Type :
Description :
Comment :
M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 25,376.8
Sec.llI-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPOES
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
M124-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 30,423.2
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
M121-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 13,094.0
Sec.III-A. Hew Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA . •.
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
M121-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 428,064.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future, Avail. Code
. O.d / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
iRS 91 Oversight «
i ATE : 11/15/94
. ile : INDORUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 40
70
71
72
73
BRS Data for "Pesticides" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
acility
0
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : -
Description :
Conment :
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 6S5.7
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0 .
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Cooinent :
N124-0ther Trtmt - 0.0 / 4.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status : •
Unit Type : •
Description :
Conment • : .
M051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 3,132.0
Sec.il I-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : • -
Description :
Conment :
M042-Incineration 0.0 / 566.7
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper.(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
•v
V
ATTACHMENT 13-2
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO BRS DATA
-------
13-2-1
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Amoco Chemical Company
DATE: 11/30/94
CONTACT NAME: William Ostrowski
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 713-581-3350
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg
This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
13-2-2
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Dow Chemical USA
DATE: 12/01/94
CONTACT NAME: Malies Greenwood
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 409-238-2805
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg ,
This facility aggregates their pesticide waste with their organic chemical waste
-------
13-2-3
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: DSM Chemicals North America
DATE: 12/02/94
CONTACT NAME: Donna Byrdy
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 706-849-6395
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg
This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
13-2-4
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Dupont de Nemours and Company
DATE: 11/29/94
CONTACT NAME: Steven Barger
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 512-572-2213
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg
• This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
13-2-5
TELEPHONE LOG
•
COMPANY NAME: Ethyl Corp
DATE: 12/6/94
CONTACT NAME: Michael Griffin
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 803-534-5781
ICF CONTACT NAME. William Freudenberg
This facility did not know if they generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
13-2-6
TELEPHONE LOG
( . «
COMPANY NAME: Merck Sharp and Dohme Quimica
DATE: 12/6/94
CONTACT NAME: Julio Diaz
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 809-846-4100
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg .
This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
13-2-7
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Mobil Chemical Company O/A Plant
DATE: 12/02/94
CONTACT NAME: Mark Matson
•
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 409-839-1245
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg
• This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
13-2-8
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Parke Davis
•'
DATE: • 12/6/94
CONTACT NAME: Perry Piccard
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 616-392-2375
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg
This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste. The SIC code of this
facility is 3824.
-------
13-2-9
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Union Carbide Chemical
DATE: 11/30/94
CONTACT NAME: Kim Harvey
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 504-468-4175 (
ICF CONTACT NAME: William Freudenberg
This facility does not generate pesticides or pesticide waste
-------
CHAPTER 14
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
14.1 INTRODUCTION
This analysis of required treatment capacity for the petroleum refining industry was
developed to support today's rule. The following sections are presented: summary of findings
(Section 14.2); background on the petroleum refining industry (Section ft.3); waste types
potentially subject to this rule (Section 14.4); available data on wastes generated and managed at
petroleum refining facilities (Section 14.5); and an analysis of required treatment capacity for the
petroleum refining industry (Section 14.6).
14.2 SUMMARY
The petroleum refining industry includes establishments that are primarily engaged in
producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, and other products
from crude petroleum and its fractionation products, through straight distillation of crude oil,
redistillation of unfinished petroleum derivatives, cracking, or other processes. EPA has identified
over 150 distinct processes that are conducted in the petroleum refineries. A summary of the
estimated impact of today's rule is presented in Exhibit 14-1.
EXHIBIT 14-1
MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
Discharge
Mode
Direct
Indirect
Zero
Total
Number of
Facilities
127
21
39
187
Total Wastewaters
Mixed With ICRT
Wastes (million
tons/yr)a
440
70
135
645
Facilities
Without
RCRA-
equiyalent
Treatment8
127
21
39 _.
187
Facilities
with Land-
based
Units8
86
. 14
27
127
Affected
Facilities8
6 to 58
4 to 10
Oto 17
10 to 85
Affected
Wastewater
(million
tons/yr)a
19 to 200
3 to 32
Oto 58
22 to 290
a The quantities in this column were determined on an aggregated basis and apportioned to the.direct,
indirect, and zero dischargers based on the percentage of each discharge mode.
This industry generates large volumes of wastewaters and uses land-based units extensively.
These data appear to indicate that most, and possibly all, wastewaters generated by this industry
contain pollutants above UTS and that most of these pollutants are not addressed adequately by
technology-based standards (e.g., NPDES permits). In the recent past, however, rules such as the
primary sludges (F037, etc.), TC, and benzene NESHAP have resulted in several changes in the
wastewater handling and treatment practices of the petroleum refining industry. EPA
-------
14-2
conservatively, estimates that up to two-thirds of these facilities have constituents above UTS
levels and thus may be affected by today's rule. The minimum number of facilities and wastewater
volume affected by this rule were estimated by calculating average concentrations of non-priority
pollutants in wastewaters assuming that priority pollutants are adequately addressed by
technology-based standards. Other assumptions and data used in this analysis are detailed in
Section 14.6. Based on these assumptions, EPA assumes that 10 to 85 facilities will be affected by
today's rule.
»
143 BACKGROUND1
The petroleum refining industry covers SIC code 2911 and includes establishments that are
primarily engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants,
and other products from crude petroleum and its fractionation products. Production processes
include straight distillation of crude oil, redistillation of unfinished petroleum derivatives, and
.cracking. Exhibit 14-2 presents a schematic of the overall petroleum refining process:
The number of petroleum refineries have been steadily decreasing in recent times. In
1981, there were 324 operable petroleum refineries, while in 1993, the number of operable
petroleum refineries decreased to 187. Of these operable facilities, only 175 petroleum refineries
were actually operating in 1993. The overall capacity of the petroleum refining industry, however,
has increased from 16.67 million barrels per day of petroleum products in 1987 to 17.45 million
barrels per day of petroleum products in 1993. Petroleum refineries are located across the
country and were present in 35 states in 1989. California, Texas, and Louisiana accounted for
more than 43 percent of all refineries and 57 percent of the U.S. capacity. Texas and California
each accounted for close to 17 percent of all petroleum refineries. '
Petroleum refining involves several manufacturing operations and processes including
crude desalting, atmospheric, and vacuum distillation, hydrotreating, catalytic cracking, thermal
processing and residual upgrading, light hydrocarbon processing, hydrocracking, catalytic
reforming, extraction, isomerizatioh, lube processing, sulfur removal and recovery, and product
blending and inventory. EPA has identified over 150 distinct processes that are conducted in the
petroleum refineries. ;
The primary raw material of this industry is crude oil. In addition, over 71 toxic chemicals
are purchased by the refineries for their operations. The primary chemicals include benzene,
carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, phenol, toluene, zinc, chromium, copper, and lead. A
spectrum of products is manufactured by petroleum refineries, including hydrogen, fuel gas, sulfur,
1 Most of this section is summarized from U.S. EPA, 1982 (October), Development Document for
Effluent Limitations Guidelines New Source Performance Standards and Pretreatment Standards for Petroleum
Refining, Point Source Category, Office of Water. It is important to note that processes and data may have
changed since the writing of the document.
2 U.S. EPA, 1990 (October), Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Listings of Primary and Secondary
OilfWater/Solids Separation Sludges from the Treatment of Petroleum Refinery Wastewaters, Office of Solid
Waste, prepared by DPRA Incorporated and ICF Incorporated. It is important to note that processes and
data may have changed since the writing of the document.
I
3 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1994 (January), U.S. Industrial Outlook 1994, Forecasts for Selected
Manufacturing and Service Industries, International Trade Administration.
-------
Pilnwry
dttlllUiloo
EXHIBIT 14-2
OVERALL PETROLEUM REFINING PROCESS
Upgrading
Product*
itimnpncfic
tftltltrtlon
Orudt
End point
tfffnptfttufi)
•c
f"
40
220
340
400
-
1 Hydrogm
|mimil«clura
t
H.
H tf
I 1
» >| Mydro-
m ««""t
lyittm
+ *"
AlkylMlon
" mitirlalt to chtmlciU
»— \
' bl^l Md |*t llMl.
ht*ttnf oil
— *• Niphlhi
— »• CM oil
t +* Lllhl productt
1 » ui— L..I
Lubclcant
m*nulKturt
Hydro -
VtMlng
i Light prodiktl
> tight productt
| • » Futl oil or iw
Source: Kirk-Othmer, 1982, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Third Edition, Volume 17, John Wiley & Sons.
-------
14-4
liquified petroleum gas, butane, aromatic feedstocks, leaded and unleaded motor gasolines, jet
fuel, kerosene, diesel, heating oil, asphalt, coke, and several toxic pollutants including benzene,
toluene, phenol, and ethylbenzene.
14.4 WASTE TYPES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY TODAY'S RULE
Petroleum refining generates large quantities of wastewaters which are generally processed
on-site prior to discharge to POTWs or surface waters. Some refineries Evaporate the water
and/or recycle and reuse their wastewaters. The petroleum refineries use land-based units
extensively for treating their wastewaters. Due to the diversity and complexity of the processes
used and products produced, petroleum refineries are generally characterized by the quantity of
raw material processed, rather than by the quantity and types of products produced. The quantity
of raw materials used by the petroleum refineries ranges from 50 barrels of oil per day (or 2,100
gallons per day) to 665,000 barrels of oil per day (or approximately 28 million gallons per day).
The wastewaters generated by the petroleum refineries contain several organic and metal
pollutants. Petroleum refineries generally treat their wastewaters using (1) in-plant.controls of
water use, (2) in-plant treatment of segregated waste streams for ammonia and sulfide removal via
steam stripping, and (3) end-of-pipe treatment consisting of oil/water separators, biological
treatment, and, in some cases, mixed media filtration. Much of this treatment is conducted in
land-based units.
The wastewater characteristics and pollutant loadings vary considerably with the operations
generating the wastewaters. In the commercial synthesis of a single product from a single
feedstock, there generally are sections of the process associated with the preparation of the
feedstock, the chemical reaction, the separation of reaction products, and the purification of the
final product Each unit operation may generate different wastewater volumes with different
pollutant loadings. Hence, the types and quantities of wastewaters generated by each plant's total
production mix are unique.
The primary refining operations that generate most of the wastewaters and pollutant
loadings are crude distillation, catalytic cracking, asphalt blowing, and drying and sweetening. The
four major sources of process wastewater among these operations are cooling water, water used to
wash unwanted materials from a process stream, water used as part of a reaction process, and
boiler blowdowns.
Approximately 68 percent of the petroleum refining facilities are direct dischargers.
Approximately 11 percent of the petroleum refining facilities are indirect dischargers. The zero
dischargers account for the remaining 21 percent of the petroleum refining facilities.4 Most of
these zero .dischargers use evaporation or percolation ponds to achieve zero discharge.
Wastewater treatment involves primary and secondary treatment. Exhibit 14-3 presents a
simplified wastewater treatment flow diagram for petroleum refining. Primary treatment includes
oil recovery units such as the primary treatment include API separators, CPI separators, other
types of oil/water/solids separators, dissolved air flotation (DAF) units and induced air flotation
units. Primary treatment also includes certain wastewater treatment units upstream of oil
recovery units, such as flow equalization units, settling units, low rate aeration units, pH
4 U.S. EPA, 1994 (June), Summary Report of Results of Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Standards
Special Study Review of the Petroleum Refining Industry, Office of Water.
-------
EXHIBIT 14-3
SIMPLIFIED END-OF-PIPE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FLOW DIAGRAM FOR PETROLEUM REFINING
Frlnurv frtitufnt
n
'n:
OINr
.rrlmrv.
ImtNtnt
!„,
IB
,'ln
tllilN
ItMnJarv Irtilmn i
ir
i
-i-»
II.M1..I
riiUllin
TrtitNtnt
SlaJft
Ililoilotl
InaiMiil
Iicoi
'n:
•rimi
Mint
li
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 13), Estimates of Waste Generation by the Petroleum Refining Industry, Final Draft Report, Office of Solid
Waste.
-------
14-6
adjustment units, and flocculation units.
Secondary treatment includes aggressive or non-aggressive biological treatment, filtration,
granular activated carbon process, powdered activated carbon process, cyanide removal, and
metals removal. Units involved with aggressive biological treatment include activated sludge
systems, water clarifier units, rotating biological contactors, trickling filter systems, high rate
aeration units, and final sand filtration units. Units involved in non-aggressive biological
treatment include low rate aeration units, settling and oxidation ponds, aftd polishing ponds.
These treatment processes are used to control biological oxygen demand (BOD5), total
suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), oil and grease, phenolic compounds,
ammonia, sulfides, pH, and chromium. At the time the.CWA regulations were promulgated (the
development document detailing the regulations is dated October 1982), the other priority
pollutants measured in the wastewaters were not addressed due to the following reasons: (1)
pollutants are effectively controlled by technologies set by other effluent limitations guidelines, (2)
pollutants were detected in trace amounts and were expected to neither cause nor be likely to
cause toxic effects, or (3) pollutants were detected at only a small number of sources and were
uniquely related to the source.
Many of the wastewaters generated by the petroleum refineries are ignitable and/or
toxicity characteristic for organics such as benzene and toluene. The following sections address
these wastes in more detail, including the degree to which they may ultimately be affected by
today's rule.
14.5 AVAILABLE DATA
Several data sources were used for obtaining information on the generation and
management of the wastes generated by the petroleum refining industry. A description of the
data sources is given in Chapter 3 of the main text of the background document. The applicable
information obtained from these data sources is provided in the sections below.
14.5.1 Effluent Guidelines Development Document
The development document for the effluent limitations guidelines for the petroleum
industry5 covered the 303 petroleum refining facilities that were operating at the time of the
compilation of that document The document presented waste characterization data on priority
pollutants that were measured in the wastewaters. The document, however, did not present any
data on non-priority pollutants. Exhibit 14-4 presents the maximum observed concentrations of
these pollutants. The concentrations given in this exhibit are the observed concentrations before
the BAT standards of the effluent limitations guidelines were promulgated in 1982. Hence,
concentrations in current discharges may potentially be lower.
According to the development document, data from an EPA sampling program have
shown that the application of technology-based standards regulated by CWA substantially reduce
the concentrations of most pollutants found in the wastewaters. Toxic pollutants were reportedly
reduced to near or below the concentrations that could be accurately measured using available
measurement techniques at the time. However, two problems should be noted concerning these
U.S. EPA, 1982 (October), op. tit.
-------
14-7
data: (1) non-priority pollutants were not addressed and (2) the technology-based treatment
standards did not adequately address all toxic priority pollutants.
EXHIBIT 14-4
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF POLLUTANTS IN EFFLUENTS3
Pollutant
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1-2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Tetrachloroethylene
Chloroform
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Pentachlorophenol
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Acenaphthene •
Naphthalene.
4,4-DDT.
a-BHC
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phtbalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chrysene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Toluene
Phenol
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
UTS
(mg/1)
0.14
0.057
0.21
0.054
0.018
0.056
0.046
0.044
0.036
0.089
0.057
0.089
0.059
0.059
0.0039
0.00014
0.087
0.28
0.057
0.20
0.047
0.017
0.061
.0.059
0.059
0.059
0.067
0.080
0.039
1.9
1.4
0.82
0.69
Effluents of Direct Dischargers
Percent
Occurrence
25
6
13
6
69
6
6
30
12
18
; 6
12
18
6
6
6
88
18
24
6
29
Maximum
Concentration (mg/1)
0.012
0.01
0.066*
0.01
O.f
0.006
0.001
2.0'
0.01
0.03
0:003
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.007
0.035
0.064*
0.37
0.9
0.002
0.02
Effluents of Indirect Dischargers
Percent
Occurrence
100
17
17
33
17
50
100
17
83
17
33
83
50
83
17
17
67
33
17
50
50
33
83
100
67
Maximum
Concentration (mg/1)
5.8'
0.031
0.054
0.015
0.018
0.021
9.3*
0.83*
18.0'
' 0.012
0.041
0.62*
0.005*
0.002*
0.023
0.04
0.038
0.016
0.012
0.081*
0.081*
0.021
48.0*
14.0*
0.069
-------
. 14-8
EXHIBIT 14-4
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF POLLUTANTS IN EFFLUENTS0 (continued)
Pollutant
Chromium
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
UTS
(mg/1)
2.77
1.2
0.69
0.15
3.98
0.82
0.43
1.4
2.61
, Effluents of Direct Dischargers
Percent
Occurrence
100
47
41
69
41
41
12
12
94
Maximum
Concentration (mg/1)
1.23
0.32
0.211
0.012
0.074
0.032
0.015
0.012
- 2.0
Effluents of Indirect Dischargers
Percent
Occurrence
100
100
83
33
17
100
100
Maximum
Concentration (mg/1)
2.196
9.0'
0.043
0.001
0.027
0.682
0.405
a U.S. EPA, 1982 (October), op. ciL
Concentration exceeds UTS.
The net facility average wastewater flow was 1.738 million gallons per day (or 2.64 million
tons per year). There were a total of 303 facilities, of which 100 facilities were direct dischargers,
148 facilities were indirect dischargers, and 55 facilities were zero dischargers.
14.5.2 POTW Report to Congress (RTC)
The 1986 RTC6 evaluated the types, sources, and quantities of hazardous wastewaters
that are discharged to POTWs. The report indicated that there were a total of 170 facilities, of
which 104 facilities were direct dischargers, 45 facilities were indirect dischargers, and 21 facilities
were zero dischargers. The report presented some characterization data for metals found in _
wastewaters discharged to POTWs. However, all of SIC code 29 was covered by the POTW
report. SIC code 29 includes petroleum refining, asphalt products, lubricating oils and greases,
and petroleum and coal products. Other shortcomings of this report for the purposes of this
analysis are that it focuses on total mass loadings instead of concentrations and does not provide
any data on the use of land-based units.
The total indirect discharge flow indicated by the RTC is 92.3 million gallons per day (140
million tons per year). The RTC also presented data on wastewater characteristics that indicated
the presence of several constituents above UTS. Exhibit 14-5 presents the typical characteristics
of wastewaters discharged to POTWs from petroleum refineries.
6 U.S. EPA, 1986. (February), Report to Confess on the Discharge of Hazardous Wastes to Publicly
Owned Treatment Works, Office of Water. .
-------
14-9
14.53 Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
Data from the 1991 BRS were extracted to determine what types of affected wastes are
generated by the petroleum refining industry. EPA obtained data for the top 25 waste generators
who treat ICRT wastes on site. (See Attachment 14-1.) A few facilities were selected for follow-
up on their BRS data submissions. This information is discussed in Section 14.5.8.
EXHIBIT 14-5
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF POLLUTANTS IN
WASTEWATERS DISCHARGED TO POTWSa
Constituent
Cadmium
Chromium
Cyanide
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
Discharge to POTW Maximum
Concentration (mg/I)
2.6
3.6
V 2.4
2.01
22
10.7
UTS Concentration
(mg/1)
0.69
2.77
1.2
0.69
3.98
2.61
U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), op. tit.
14.5.4 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
EPA used TRI data along with ISDB data (see Section 14.5.7).
14.5.5 Permit Compliance System (PCS)
EPA found that approximately 44 of the 106 petroleum refining direct dischargers
providing information on their treatment types in the PCS used one of the treatment types that
indicated the potential use of a land-based unit. However, the total number of direct dischargers
mentioned in the PCS (337) is greater than the total number of operable petroleum refineries
(192; see Section 14.5.7). Also, it is not clear how many of these facilities generate ICRT wastes.
These factors lead to uncertainty in the use of these data.
14.5.6 Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey
The Subtitle D Industrial Non-hazardous Waste Screening Survey provides information
regarding whether wastes are managed on site in Subtitle D land-based units at industrial
facilities. For each of the facilities surveyed, information was gathered oh the quantities of total
waste generated each year, and how the waste is distributed among surface impoundments,
-------
14-10
landfills, waste piles, and land application units. All numbers in the final report7 were
extrapolated to the entire industry sector.
In April 1989, these and other data were analyzed to further characterize the industrial
Subtitle D universe.8 This analysis indicated that of the 1,585 facilities in the petroleum sector
(SIC code 29) there are 366 facilities (approximately 23 percent) that use land-based units to treat
approximately 168 million tons of wastewater.
»
The Industrial Subtitle D Survey has several important limitations. The information is
based on waste quantities in 1985 and does not provide information that can be used to determine
the waste characteristics or waste composition. Also, SIC code 29 includes petroleum refining,
asphalt products, lubricating oils and greases, and petroleum and coal products. However, due to
the nature and volume of wastewaters generated, EPA believes that at least half of these surface
impoundments and most of the wastewater volume are ai petroleum refineries.
14.5.7 Industry Studies Database (ISDB) ,
The Industry Studies Database (ISDB) report9 summarizes data from the ISDB which
was developed as part of the Hazardous Waste Listing Program. The report presents information
on the number of facilities and volumes of ignitable, corrosive, and reactive (ICR) wastes
managed in CWA, SDWA, or CWA-equivalent systems that may be affected by this rule. The
ISDB report was intended as a supplement to other research in making capacity determinations
and does, not present detailed analysis of the potential impact of the Phase II or IV on capacity.
The report includes information on the generation, management, and constituent concentrations
of ICR wastes for several industrial categories.
The ISDB characterized the petroleum refining industry for 1983. The ISDB covered the
156 facilities that were operating at the time of the compilation of the database. The ISDB
report presented the following details on the petroleum refining industry: .
• 133 facilities generated ICR wastes.
• Of the 133 facilities that generated ICR wastes, 85 facilities (or 64 percent)
managed ICR wastes in CWA, SDWA, or CWA-equivalent systems. The total
volume of wastewaters managed in these systems was 1,789,131 metric tons (1.97 .
million tons). Of this quantity, 2 percent was ignitable, 94 percent was corrosive,
and 4 percent was reactive.
• Of the 133 facilities that generated ICR wastes, 23 facilities used land application
units for treatment, 6 facilities utilized deep well injection, 31 facilities used only
tank-based systems (i.e., no surface impoundments) for treatment, and 66 facilities
7 Westat Inc., 1987 (December 29), Screening Survey of Industrial Subtitle D Establishments, Draft Final
Report, submitted to EPA.
8 ICF Inc., 1989 (April 3), Characterization of the Industrial Subtitle D Universe, Results of First Task,
memorandum to EPA. '
t
9 U.S. EPA, 1994 (November 30), Summary Data from Industry Studies Database for Use in Phase III
Capacity Determinations, Draft, submitted by Science Applications International Corporation.
-------
14-11 ,
used surface impoundments and tanks for treatment. Of the 66 facilities that used
surface impoundments and tanks for treatment, 45 facilities discharged the wastes
under NPDES, 7 facilities discharged to POTWs, 1 facility used deep well
injection, 1 facility used a land application unit, and 8 facilities did not specify the
method of disposal. These 66 facilities account for 94 percent of the quantity of
ICR wastes managed in CWA, SDWA, or CWA-equivalent systems.
• Of the 133 facilities that generated ICR wastes, 24 facilit^s directly discharged
their wastes without treatment. Of these 24 facilities, 17 facilities used land
application units, 3 facilities directly discharged to POTWs, and 4 facilities used
deep well injection.
The report also presented ranges of constituent concentrations in ICR wastes managed in
CWA, SDWA, or CWA-equivalent systems. However, these concentrations were generally
estimated/measured at the point of generation and the effluent concentrations are typically much
.lower due to dilution and wastewater treatment. Exhibit 14-6 presents the maximum
concentrations of constituents that exceeded UTS.
EXHIBIT 14-6
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF CONSTITUENTS WITH
CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE UTS LEVELS"
Constituent
Arsenic
Barium
Benzene
Cadmium
Chromium
UTS Level
(mg/1)
1.4
1.2
0.14
0.69
2.77
Maximum
Concentrations
(mg/1)
550
2,000
55,000
550
10,000
Constituent
Lead
Methanol
Phenol
Sulfide
Cresols
UTS Level
(mg/1)
0.69
5.6
0.039
14
0.77
Maximum
Concentrations
(mg/1)
10,000
750,000
550
300,000
55,000
U.S. EPA, 1994 (November 30), op. cit.
EPA used data in the TRI database and the ISDB to conduct the required analysis of the
impact of today's rule on the petroleum refining industry. This analysis, however, focused only on
non-priority pollutants, based on the assumption that all priority pollutants are addressed by
technology-based standards. The analysis indicated that 137 of the 202 petroleum refineries (or
68 percent) use land-based units for treating wastewaters. Using the same percentage, EPA
estimates that currently there are 127 petroleum refineries that use land-based units. The
methodology and results of this analysis are presented below.
According to the ISDB data, flow rates among facilities range from 12,000 gallons per day
to 24 million gallons per day. From these data EPA determined low, average, and high flow rates
and, for direct dischargers, calculated constituent concentrations at: (1) a low flow rate of 250,000
gallons per day; (2) an average flow rate of 3.22 million gallons per day; and, (3) a high flow rate
-------
14-12
of 10 million gallons per day. For indirect dischargers, EPA used: (1) a low flow rate of 200,000
gallons per day; (2) an average flow rate of 720,000 gallons per day; and, (3) a high flow rate of
1.77 million gallons per day. The high and low flow rates represent the 95th percentile and 5th
percentile values for the facilities listed under each category of effluent dischargers. Using the
estimated waste generator rates and TRI data, EPA calculated the constituent concentrations in
the effluent from direct and indirect discharges. EPA found that:
• Four indirect dischargers could have UTS level exceedancfs for xylenes, methyl
' ethyl ketone, and cresols; and
• Six direct dischargers could have UTS level exceedances for xylenes, methyl ethyl
ketone, cresols, and methanol.
EPA multiplied the number of direct and indirect dischargers affected by the average daily
discharge for both types of facilities to estimate that at least 22 million tons of waste could be
affected each year.
14.5.8 Industry Contacts
In order to better understand the generation and management of wastewaters at
petroleum refining facilities, EPA contacted facilities to follow-up on their BRS data submissions.
This follow-up information indicated that most of the facilities contacted are direct dischargers.
The information also indicated that several pollutants found in wastewaters may not be addressed
by the NPDES permits. Most of the facilities have not analyzed for the underlying hazardous
constituents in their wastewaters. The information obtained is summarized in Exhibit 14-7.
Detailed information obtained from the facilities is provided in the form of telephone logs in
Attachment 14-2.
14.5.9 Comments to Previous Rules
EPA reviewed the comments to previous rules and did not find any applicable information
for this analysis.
14.5.10 TCRIA
. A TC RIA report10 presented estimates of waste generation by the petroleum refining
industry. This document is part of a series of background documents for the rule on toxicity
characteristic wastes. This report characterized the 220 refineries that were operating at the time
of the compilation of the report The report estimated that the petroleum refining industry
generates approximately 760 million tons of wastewater per year. Exhibit 14-8 presents waste
characterization data for raw and treated wastewaters. This exhibit indicates that none of effluent
concentrations of the five measured constituents exceed UTS in the wastewater after secondary
treatment -
10
U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 13), op. cit.
-------
14-13
EXHIBIT 14-7
SUMMARY OF BRS FOLLOW-UP CONTACTS
Company Name
Amoco Oil Company
- Mandan Refinery
Amoco Oil Company
Refinery3
Champlin Refining
and Chemicals, Inc.
Chevron - Mississippi
Crown Central
Petroleum Corp.
Koch Refining
Company
Sun Company
Total Petroleum
Incorporated
ICRT
Wastes
Yes.
-
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Land-
Based
Units
Yes
-
No
No
No
No
No
No
Constituent
Concentrations
above UTS
Yes
-
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Quantity
Discharged
(tons/year)
NA
-
2,492,950
3,165,864
2.1 (MOD)
3,000,000
2,000
1.2 (MOD)
Direct
Dischargeiv
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Indirect
Discharger
No
-
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Zero
Discharger
No
-
No
Nq
No
No
No
No
a Facility did not want to provide information.
MGD - Million gallons per day
NA - Information Not Available
14.5.11 Effluent Limitations Special Study Review of the Petroleum Refining Industry
The effluent limitations special study review11 provided information for determining
whether the current effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the petroleum industry
should be revised or updated. The report is a compilation of data collected during 1992 and
1993, and includes comparisons with data collected in the late 1970's (which formed the basis of
the existing limitations).
As of .1990, only 22 of the 192 existing facilities were indirect dischargers. The data also
indicate that there were approximately 137 direct dischargers in 1992. Exhibit 14-9 presents
maximum concentration data for effluents of indirect dischargers. Exhibit 14-10 presents average
metal concentration data for effluents of direct dischargers. The average concentrations of metals
in effluents of direct dischargers was estimated using total pollutant loading information and
effluent volume data from the PCS. Note that although only one constituent exceeds UTS, the
concentrations are only averages and therefore, other UTS exceedances are likely.
11
U.S. EPA, 1994 (June), op. tit.
-------
14-14
14.5.12 Analyses of F037/F038 Wastes
The summary statistics for the petroleum refining industry were presented in a regulatory
impact analysis (RIA) of the listing of F037/F038 wastes (i.e., primary and secondary treatment
sludges from treatment systems upstream of aggressive biological treatment systems).12
Petroleum refineries are located across the country and were present in 35 states in 1989.
California, Texas, and Louisiana accounted for more than 43 percent of all refineries and 57
percent of the U.S. capacity. Texas and California each accounted close ^o 17 percent of all
petroleum refineries. Another 9 states had six or more refineries present within their borders.
The 204 operable refineries present at the beginning of 1989 were owned by 106 companies. Of
these companies, 10 companies possessed over 57 percent of the crude distillation capacity and
another 21 companies controlled an additional 30 percent
The RIA report estimated that approximately 89 percent of the petroleum refineries used
surface impoundments and generated primary and/or secondary oil/water/solids separation sludges.
The report also estimates that over 84 percent of the petroleum refineries have wastewaters that
are toxicity characteristic (TC) for benzene and/or metals. Since the compilation of the report in
1990, the TC rule for organics has been promulgated, resulting in most refineries having changed
their practices of handling and treating wastewaters. Hence, this source of data must be used with
caution to estimate the current number of refineries using surface impoundments.
The F037/F038 capacity analysis for the petroleum refining industry presented an analysis
of primary and secondary treatment sludges.13 This report, however, concentrated on the
sludges and, except for a few facilities, did not provide any significant information on the
generation or management of wastewaters.
14.5.13 Analysis of the TC Survey
In 1992, EPA had conducted a survey of major facilities that generate or manage toxicity
characteristic (TC) (i.e., organic TC codes: RCRA codes D018 through D043) wastes for
developing land disposal restrictions for these TC wastes. This TC survey covered several large
petroleum refineries.
The primary problems associated with this survey for the purposes of this analysis are that
the survey only covered only a fraction of the currently operating petroleum refineries and
focused only on wastewaters that carried the organic TC codes. The large volumes of wastewaters
at the petroleum refineries that were characteristic only for ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or
metals were not covered by this survey. Furthermore, most of the refineries responding to the
survey presented data on the TC organics and did not present any data on underlying hazardous
constituents. Hence, the survey could not .be used for estimating concentrations of underlying
hazardous constituents or wastewater volumes affected by today's rule.
However, the survey does present some information on the trend of land-based units at
petroleum refineries. Due to the combined effect of several regulations such as the minimum
technology requirements for surface impoundments and the TC LDRs, most of the refineries are
12 U.S. EPA, 1990 (October), op. tit.
13 U.S. EPA, 1992 (June), Background Document for the Capacity Analysis for Newfy Listed Wastes and
Hazardous Debris to Support 40 CFR 268 Land Disposal Restrictions (Final Rule), Office of Solid Waste.
-------
14-15
switching to tanks for managing their wastewaters. The data indicated that all of the petroleum
refineries covered by the survey planned on switching to tank-based units by the end of 1994 to
manage all their organic TC wastewaters. Note that the TC survey only covered organic TC
wastewaters and hence, this trend may not be applicable to the entire characteristic wastewater
volume at petroleum refineries.
14.5.14 Comments to the Proposed Phase III Rule
•
In comments received on the Proposed Phase III rule, the American Petroleum Institute
(API) and seven companies operating large petroleum refineries confirmed the presence of oil
and hydrocarbons in high concentrations (up to 10,000 ppm of oil) in the wastewaters originally
generated and discharged to process sewers at their facilities (Attachment 4-3). These
commenters also confirmed the use of non-hazardous waste surface impoundments and the
presence of UHCs at levels above their corresponding UTS. All refineries, however, make an
attempt to recover and reuse these pollutants before the wastewaters are treated and finally
discharged. At the same time, according to API, many facilities have started segregating highly
concentrated wastewaters even before discharging them to process sewers due to the recent
promulgation of the Benzene Waste NESHAP (BWN).
Because of these waste management practices, the petroleum refining industry believes
that LDRs on decharacterized wastewaters should be applied at the last point of aggregation of ~
wastewaters at each refinery. Furthermore, API and some of these companies have provided data
to confirm the effectiveness of Aggressive Biological Treatment (ABT) systems installed at their
facilities. Some companies also confirmed the generation and discharge of large quantities of
stormwater (with low risk) through "wet-weather" surface impoundments at their facilities.
14.6 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS
EPA estimates that there are 187 facilities in the petroleum refining industry.14 A TC
RIA report15 estimated the waste generation by the petroleum refining industry. This report
characterized the 220 refineries that were operating at the time of the compilation of the report.
The report estimated that the petroleum refining industry generates approximately 760 million
tons of wastewater per year. Scaling this estimate to the current number of facilities in the
industry, EPA estimates that currently the petroleum refining industry generates approximately
645 million tons of wastewater per year.
The effluent limitations special study review16 indicated that as of 1990, only 22 of'the
192 existing facilities were indirect dischargers. The data also indicated that in 1992,
approximately 137 of the 202 petroleum refineries were direct dischargers. Scaling these numbers
to the current number of facilities in the industry, EPA estimates that currently there are 127
direct dischargers, 21 indirect dischargers, and 39 zero dischargers in the petroleum industry.
The primary limitations of the analysis conducted using the TRI and ISDB databases for
the purposes of this rule's analysis are: (1) the analysis did not attempt to identify wastes that are
14 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1994 (January), op. tit
15 U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 13), op. tit.
16 U.S. EPA, 1994 (June), op. tit.
-------
14-16
characteristic for toxic organics (e.g., benzene); and (2) wastewaters such as desalter brine, process
sour waters, ballast water, pump gland water, tank farm waters, boiler water blowdown, sanitary
wastes, storm water, cooling tower blowdown, and oils sent to slop oil system .were not addressed.
Also, the ISDB report used in the analysis mentioned the following factors that affect the current
applicability of the data set:
• The industry has restructured significantly over the past 10 years. The number of
small less-efficient refineries have reduced significantly. Consequently, the number
of facilities using improper or out-dated management practices may have reduced.
• Several rules such as the TC rule, benzene NESHAP, sludge listings, and EPA fuel
standards have changed or been promulgated in the last 10 years. These rules
have caused the petroleum refineries to change or reduce practices such as land
disposal.
Furthermore, the analysis conducted using the TRI and ISDB databases made the
assumption that all priority pollutants are addressed by technology-based standards. This may lead
to an understatement of the actual number of affected facilities. Hence, EPA used the results
obtained from this analysis as the estimate for the minimum number of facilities and wastewater
volumes that may be affected by today's rule:
EPA used the following assumptions to estimate the maximum number of facilities and
wastewater volumes' that may be affected by this rule:
• EPA conservatively estimates that up to two-thirds, (or 85 facilities) of the
petroleum refining facilities have priority or non-priority constituents above UTS
levels and thus may .be affected by this rule. EPA lacks the data to develop more
accurate estimates.
• . EPA lacks the data to differentiate which of the estimated 127 petroleum refining
facilities with land-based units are direct, indirect, or zero dischargers. Considering
that (i) the type of operations and characteristics of generated wastewaters and (ii)
the average wastewater generation at all petroleum refining facilities are similar,
EPA assumes that the distribution between the direct, indirect, and zero
dischargers for facilities with land-based units is the same as the overall distribution
of petroleum refining facilities between direct, indirect, and zero dischargers (i.e.,
68, 11, and 21 percent, respectively). EPA used this same distribution to
differentiate between the estimated 85 upper bound affected petroleum refining
, facilities.
• The total wastewater volume was obtained from the TC RIA report and the
wastewater volume for indirect dischargers was obtained from the POTW Report
to Congress. All other wastewater volumes were estimated using average
wastewater flows.
This industry generates large volumes of wastewaters and uses land-based units extensively.
The available characterization data17'18'19'20 appear to indicate that most, and possibly all,
17 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), op. tit
-------
14-17
wastewaters generated by this industry contain pollutants above UTS levels and that most of these
pollutants are not addressed adequately by technology-based standards (e.g., NPDES permits). In
the recent past, however, rules such as the primary sludges (F037, etc.), TC, and benzene
NESHAP have resulted in several changes in the wastewater handling and treatment practices of
the petroleum refining industry. Thus, it is difficult to ascertain the facilities and wastewaters that
are affected by this rule.
Using the data and assumptions, EPA estimates that up to 85 petroleum refining facilities
and 290 million tons of wastewater may be affected by today's rule. Assuming that all priority
pollutants will be addressed by technology-based standards regulated by CWA, EPA estimates that
at least 10 petroleum refining facilities and 22 million tons of wastewater that have non-priority
pollutants with end-of-pipe concentrations above UTS levels win be affected by this rule.
18 U.S. EPA, 1994 (November 30), op. cit
19 U.S. EPA, 1982 (October), op. cit
20 U.S. EPA, 1994 (June), op. cit.
-------
x
ATTACHMENT 14-1
BRS DATA
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh. CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 1
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
6 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
CAD008354052 MOBIL OIL CORP TORRANCE
Source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Fora'Code : B104-Inorganic Liquid •
Waste Description : SPENT (HF) HYDROFLUORIC ACID SOLUTION AND ASO (ACID SOLUBLE OIL) FROM ALKYLATION PROCESS UNIT. (RCRA)
Comnents :
CAS Numbers . :
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
onsite Info (System/Qty) : M121-Other Trtmt/1,813.2 N125-0ther Trtmt/1,813.2
Waste Codes : D002
/
CAD008354052 MOBIL OIL CORP . TORRANCE 9 2911 1-On-stte activity 1-Before nix
Source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Fora Code : BlU-lnorganlc Liquid .
Waste Description : WASTEWATER FROM THE REGENERATION OF SPENT RESIN IN DEM1NERALIZER UNIT; PH RANGES FRdM LESS THAN 2.6 TO > 12.5. (RCRA)
Comnents : .
CAS Numbers :
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
Onsjte info (System/Qty) : M121-0ther Trtmt/872.525.7
Waste Codes : D002 . -
1,813.2 2-No
872,525.7 2-No
PS Page System
3 M121-Other Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Totat/RCRA)
1,813.2 / 1,813.2 1,908.7 / 1,908.7 1,813.2 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper.. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0/0.0 '
Regulatory Status : 07-RCRA/UIC
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
-------
91 Oversight
,i : 11/15/94
_• : IN05RUN1.RPT
CM & PS forms (As of 11/94)
Page 2
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
ility
Facility
Name
Unit Type
' Description
Comment
City
: ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION TREATMENT SYSTEM
: SECTION II, BOX C - DISCHARGED TO COttR.
GM
Page
sic
FOR ALKYLATION ACID
' Origin •
Code
TAR BEFORE DISCHARGE
Point of Measurement
TO IWU/COKER.
1991 Tons
Generated ,
Radio-
active
M125-0ther Trtmt 15,491.4/15,491.4 3,180,975.0/3,180,975.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
3,212,784.7 / 3,212.784.7
1993
1
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational • .
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : MOBIL DELAYED COKING UNIT ' .
Cooment : SECTION I, BOX B: DELAYED COKING PROCESS. SECTION II, BOX A: FEED INCLUDES NEUTRALIZED ALKY ASO AND API/GFU SLUDGE.
M121-Other Trtmt 872,525.7 / 872,525.7
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper.. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
969,473.0 / 969,473.0 . 872,525.7 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity.
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 07-RCRA/UIC '
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 01-Tank -
Description : OEHINERALIZER WASTE WATER'NEUTRALIZATION BEFORE DISCHARGE TO POTW.
Comnent : SECTION II, A. QUANTITY ESTIMATE BASED ON AVERAGE FLOW RATE OF 400 GAL/HIN. B. BASED ON INFLUENT QTY. BEING 90X OF MAXIM
UM OPERATIONAL CAPACITY; EFFLUENT HAS PH LIMITS. SECTION I, A. THIS UNIT IS A TOTALLY ENCLOSED SYSTEM WHICH IS DIRECTLY
ONNECTED TO THE PRODUCTION PROCESS. IT IS CONSTRUCTED AND OPERATED IN A MANNER THAT PREVENTS THE RELEASE OF ANY HAZARDOU
<009164021 SHELL OIL CO/MARTINEZ MFC COMP MARTINEZ 6 2911 1-On-site activity 1 -Before mix 31,500.0 2-No
. irce Code
.m Code
ite Description
.nments
s Nuifcers
1 Constituent
site Info (System/Qty)
ste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
8109- Inorganic Liquid '
SPENT CAUSTIC (CORROSIVE) FROM PETROLEUM REFINING
-.
2-No TRI Constituent '
H032-0ther Recovery/31,500.0
D002 '
-------
IRS 91 Oversight
)ATE : 11/15/94
Hie : 1ND5RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
. Page 3
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
CAD009164021 SHELL OIL CO/HARTINEZ NFG COMP
MARTINEZ
44 2911 5-Residual
3-After mix with non-HU
7,250,000.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Conments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A75-PoU Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B102-Inorganic Liquid
PROCESS WATER AND STORM WATER FROM PETROLEUM REFINING
SECIE-HYOROCARBON RECOVERY AND SOLIDS REMOVAL
2-No TRI Constituent
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/7.250,000.0
D018
CAD009164021 SHELL OIL CO/MARTINEZ MFC COMP
MARTINEZ
47 2911 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-HU
3,500,000.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Conments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid
PROCESS WATER AND STORM WATER FROM PETROLEUM REFINING
SECI(SYSTEM 1-HYDROCARBON RECOVERY AND SOLIDS REMOVAL
2-No TRI Constituent
M032-Other Recovery/3,500,000.0
0018
PS Page System.
44 M041-Incineration
Sec.lll-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
206.5 / 60.9
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
2,830.0 / 301.2
Future Avail. Code
25,190.8 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
-------
; 91 Oversight
It : 11/15/94
le : INDSRUN1.RPT
CM t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 4
45
46
47
48
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
c
ility
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Unit Type : 01-Tank 03-Incinerator
Description : INCINERATION OF TWO LIQUID ORGANIC STREAMS, ONE EPA REGULATED (D001 AND U220) AND ONE REGULATED BY CALIFORNIA, IN A LIQU
ID INJECTION INCINERATOR. ;.
Cooroent : II.E: THE TWO ON-SlTE INCINERATORS SHARE A PERMIT CAPACITY LIMIT OF 15,380 TONS. H.B. KCRA CAPACITY ESTIMATE IS PORTION
OF PERMIT CAPACITY LIMIT BASED ON PROPORTION TREATED IN 1991.
M04Mncineration 26,175.9 / 10,336.9 .62,570.0 / 15,078.8 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
606.8 / 606.8
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type ' : 01-Tank •' 04-Kiln, Furnace, or Boiler
Description : INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS (OAF FLOAT) AND NONHAZARDOUS (ACTIVATED SLUDGE) WASTE WATER TREATMENT SLUDGES IN INDUSTRIAL BO
ILERS.
Garment : II.E: THE TWO ON-SITE INCINERATORS SHARE A PERMIT CAPACITY LIMIT OF 15,380 TONS. U.B: RCRA CAPACITY ESTIMATE IS PORTION
OF PERMIT CAPACITY LIMIT BASED ON PROPORTION TREATED IN 1991.
M032-0ther Recovery 31.500.0 / 31,500.0
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
42,460.0 / 42,460.0 31,500.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
08-Exempt
01-Operational .
01-Tank
NEUTRALIZATION OF SPENT CAUSTIC IN A COLUMN.
I.B: ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION WITH RECOVERY OF SULFUR.
M032-0ther Recovery 45,752.8 / 7,296.9
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
25,725.1 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
16,541.57 2,859.5
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt •
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 02-Container 10-Tank
Description : HYDROCARBON RECOVERY WITH SLUDGE DEWATERING. PORTABLE SYSTEM OWNED, OPERATED, AND PERMITTED BY A CONTRACTOR.
Comment : I.B: HYDROCARBON RECOVERY WITH SLUDGE DEWATERING. II.F: SYSTEM IS COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE BUT NOT WHILE LOCATED AT SHELL
MARTINEZ. I.E: CENTRIFUGE AND/OR GRAVITY BELT FILTER PRESS AND/OR PLATE AND FRAME FILTER PRESS AND/OR OTHER DEWATERING E
OUIPMENT. .'••".
M032-0ther Recovery 7,250,000.0 / 3,500,000.0 9,200,000.0 / 9,200,000.0 7,250,000.0 / 7,250,000.0 17,633.8 / 17,633.8
Sec.lll-A. Hew Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
-------
iRS 91 Overs igtu M t PS Forms (As of
'ATE : 11/15/94 Page 5
rile : IND5RUN1.RPT
racillty Facility
ID Name
11/94)
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
CM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
City Page SIC Code point of Measurement Generated active
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT FOR PROCESS AND STORM WATER FROM PETROLEUM REFINING. ACTIVATED-SLUDGE, WATER TREATMENT POND REP
ORTED SEPARATELY.
Comment : I.B: HYDROCARBON RECOVERY AND SOLIDS REMOVAL.
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 7,250,000.0/7,250,000.0 9,200,000.0/9,200,000.0 7,250,000.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) -Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
35,812.8 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type . : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : BIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION OF A PROCESS WATER STREAM (D018) IN AN ACTIVATED SLUDGE, WATER TREATMENT POND. ONE UNIT IN AN EFF
LUENT TREATMENT SYSTEM.
Comnent : '
C0000010997S COLORADO REFINING CO. (FORMERLY ASAMERA) COMMERCE CITY
5 2911 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
360,300.3 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent ;
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid .
PROCESS UASTEWATER FROM PETROLEUM REFINING; CONTAINS BENZENE
IIA INCLUDES 21.300,000 GALLONS OF RCRA WASTEWATER AND 59,900,000 GALLONS OF NON-RCRA (PRIOR TO TC RULE) WASTEWATER
00071-43-2
3-TRI Constituent(s) *
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/360,300.3
D018
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 360,300.3 / 360,300.3 499,249.4 / 499,249.4 359,883.27 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
400.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 6
File : INOSRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status j 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF 0018 UASTEWATER IN A SURFACE IN- POUNDMENT.
Cooment :
UD080012305 SHELL OIL CO . ROXANA
Source Code : A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : B219-0rganic Liquid
Uaste Description : ' ' •' .
Comments . : ;
CAS Numbers . : 00100-41-4 00108-88-3 01330-20-7 07440-47-3 07664-41-7
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/9,419,004.0
Uaste Codes : D018
14 2911 1-On-site activity 4-After nix of HU & hon-HU 9.419,004.0 2-No
ILD080012305 SHELL OIL CO . ROXANA
Source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Forn Code : B109-Inorganic Liquid
Uaste Description . :
Comments : "
CAS Numbers :
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M121-Other Trtmt/15,141.3
Uaste Codes : D002
15 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before nix
15.141.3 2-No
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
-------
3RS 91 Oversigh.
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IN05RUN1.RPT
CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 7
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
31
32
33
M123-0ther Trtmt 9.444.120.1 / 9,444,120.1
Sec.III-A. Net* Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
21,918,265.2 / 21,918,265.2 9,443,874.1 / 9,443.874.1
Future Avail. Code ' X Future Capacity
350.0 / 350.0
1994
Y 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type ••' : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description :
Comment : .
H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 9.444.120.1 / 9,444,120.1'
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
21.918,265.2 / 21,918,265.2 9,443,769.8 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
SOO.O / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description :
Conment :
H133-Dtsposal 192,106.6 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Y 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 06-Other
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description :
Conment :
1999
3,084,089.3 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
1
189.399.1 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
1.921.0 / 0.0
KSD087418695 TOTAL PETROLEUM INC ARKANSAS CITY 7 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
Source Code : ATS-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt .
Form Code : B102-Inorganic Liquid ,
Waste Description : WASTEWATER CONTAINING BENZENE
Comnents : WASTEWATER NEWLY REGULATED AS A CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS WASTE DUE TO BENZENE TOXlClTY (D018) OH 9/25/90.
CAS Numbers :
1,821,350.0 2-No
-------
,RS 91 Oversight • GH 1 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
,ATE : 11/15/94 Page 8
ile : IND5RUH1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility
iO
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
,RI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituents)
insite Info (System/Qty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/1,821,350.0
laste Codes : 0018
PS Page System
' 9 M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Sec.lll-A.
1.821,350.0 / 1.821,350.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
3,283,686.0 / 3,283.686.0 1,821,350.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1994
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA ,
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT/BIOLOGICAL (AGGRESSIVE AERATION) TREATMENT
Conment : THE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT WILL BE CLOSED IN 1994 AS PER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
LAD0080803SO CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
LAKE CHARLES
17 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
12,931.4 2-No
source Code
Font Code
.Jaste Description
Comments
CAS Nunbers
fHI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A89-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
Bill-Inorganic Liquid
SOUR WATER GENERATED DURING PRODUCTION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTSMIXTURE OF UATER/SULFIDES/PNENOLS/AMMOMIA/OIL I GREASE/GRIT/
AND OTHER DISSOLVED SOLIDS . .
00071-43-2 00108-88-3
3-TRI Constftuent(s)
M134-Disposal/12.931.4
D003
01330-20-7
LAD008080350 CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION LAKE CHARLES
Source Code : A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
:orm Code : B119-Inorganic Liquid
Vaste Description : PROCESS WASTEWATER FROM PROCESS SEWERS; MIXTURE OF OIL/
26 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
WATER/SOLIDS. TREATED IN All NPDES TREATMENT TRAIN
13,527,855.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight u
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Paige 9
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
Comnents
City
: SECTION I. D:
H:
GH Origin
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
SIC, 2869
PROCESS WASTEUATER
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
SECTION II. ON-SITE SYSTEM 1:
: 00071-43-2
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M094-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/13,527,855.0
Waste Codes
: D018
NPDES ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT TRAIN
20
System Influent (Total/RCRA)
M134-Dlsposal 12,931.4 / 12.931.4
Sec.Ill-A. Neu Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 07-RCRA/UIC
'Operational Status : 01-Operational
1900
Unit Type
Description
Comment
06-Underground Inj. Well 10-Tank
FOUR INJECTION WELLS USED FOR THE DISPOSAL OF SOUR WATER
SECTION i, E: FILTER VESSELS USED TO.FILTER AQUEOUS
SECTION II, B: RESERVOIR IS UNLIMITED '
SECTION III, B: INJECTION WELLS ARE TO BE REPLACED WITH
LINE IN 1992, THE INJECTION WELLS WILL BE
REGULATIONS
WASTE PRIOR TO INJECTION
SECTION II, E: NO KNOWN LIMITS
SOUTH WATER STEAM STRIPPERS. WHEN THESE GO ON
PLUGGED AND ABANDONED UNDER EXISTING
N124-0ther Trtmt
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper;
2,206.5 / 2,206.5
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Future Avail. Code
0,0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 06-Other
1900
Unit Type
Description
Comment
10-Tank , .
PRIVATE CONTRACTOR USING MOBILE EQPMNT CONS1STING/CENTRIFUGEPLATE & FRAME PRESS/ASSOCIATED EQPMNt BROUGHT IN AS VOLUMES
DICTATE/PROCESS WASTE STREAMS. SPLITS OUT WATER/OIL/SOLIDS
SECTION I. D: SYSTEM IS OWNED BY PRIVATE CONTRACTOR
REMOVE OIL/WATER/SOLIDS SECTION I,
SCREEN, PLATE & FRAME PRESS SECTION II,
THIS AMOUNT NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL RECORDED
THIS SYSTEM BROUGHT IN TO PROCESS WASTE TO
E: SYSTEM INCLUDES CENTRIFUGE, SHAKER
C: RECOVERED OIL WITH <190BSW • 929.6 TONS
22
N124-0ther Trtmt
6,534.3 / 6,534.3
0.0 / 0.0
3,677.3 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
iRS 91 Oversight
'ATE : 11/15/94
ile : IND5RUN1.RPT
GN ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 10
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
facility
ID
Facility
Name
Sec. 11 I -A.
N
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0 . • '
City
Year of
Change
1900
GN
Page
Future Avail.
SIC
Code
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
X Future Capacity
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
24
25
27
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 06-Other
Unit Type : 10-Tank
Description : PRVT CONTRACTOR USING MOBILE/EQPMNT CONSIST/SHAKER SCREEN/ CENTRIFUGE/PLATE ft FRAME PRESS/ASCT. EQPMNT BROUGHT IN AS
VOLUME/DICTATE PROCESS UST/STRM; SEPT/U.ST • OIL/UATER/SOL1DS
Comment : SECTION I, D: SYSTEM OWNED BY PVT/CONTRACTOR; BROUGHT IN
SECTION I, E: SYSTEM INCLUDES CENTRIFUGE/SHAKER SCREENS/
TO PROCESS WASTE TO REMOVE OIL/WATER/SOLIDS
PLATE ft FRAME PRESS
M125-0ther Trtmt 5,460.0 / 5,460.0
Sec.UI-A. Hen Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity .
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type
Description
Comnent
M124-0ther Trtmt
10-Tank
INJECTION/SLUDGE INTO COKING UNIT TO FORM PETROLEUM COKE
CYCLE CALLED THE MOSC PROCESS (MOBIL OIL SLUDGE COKING)
SECTION I, E: INDUSTRIAL COKING UNIT
.USING MOBIL PROCESS. SLUDGE IS INJECTED DURING COOLING
4,095.1 / 4.095.1
Sec.UI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.07 0.0
Future Avail. Code
2,155.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
302.1 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status '
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
02-NPDES
06-Other '
10-Tank
TREATMENT/SLUDGE USING PLATE ft FRAME PRESS TO DEWATER;.
TO INCINERATOR FOR DISPOSAL OR TO FUELS PROGRAM FOR REUSE
SECTION I, D: SYSTEM IS OWNED BY PRIVATE CONTRACTOR.
SECTION I, E: SYSTEM INCLUDES PLATE ft FRAME PRESS AND
FOLLOWED BY STEAM TUNNEL DRYER. RESULTANT SOLIDS THEN SENT
USED AS HEEDED TO PROCESS OILY SLUDGES
STEAM DRYER
M094-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt 13,527,855.0 / 13,527,855.0 21,917,520.0 /.21,917,520.0 13,527,855.0 / 0.0
Sec.UI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
9,368.7 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
1900
09-Surface Impoundment
-------
S 91 Oversight
IE : 11/15/94
le : INDSRUN1.RPT
.A t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 11
BUS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
.eillty
Facility
Name
Description
Comment
City
: WASTEWATER TREATMENT TRAIN CONSISTING/SURGE
SETTLING POND/POLISHING POND
GN
Page SIC
BASIN/EQUALIZA- TION
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
BASIN/FLOCCULATION/DAF TANKS/AERATION BASIN/CLARIFIERS/
.0008179707 MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
CHALMETTE
4 2911 1-On-site activity 2-After ml* of HU
806.070.0 2-No
urce Code
..cm Code
.ste Description
nroents '
S Numbers
I Constituent
.site Info (System/Qty)
.ste Codes
A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Bill-Inorganic Liquid
REACTIVE SOUR WATER (PROCESS WASTEWATER) FROM PETROLEUM REFINING PROCESSES.
00071-43-2
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M134-Dlsposal/806,070.0
D003 D018
PS Page System
17 M052-Energy Recovery
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
21,160.0 / 10,580.0
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
, Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
' 37,600.0 / 37,600.0
. Future Avail. Code
15,870.0/0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
5,290.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt .
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 10-Tank
Description : SLUDGE COKING AT DELAYED COKING PROCESS UNIT. RECYCLES OILY SLUDGES PRODUCED IN THE REFINERY, USING MOBIL"? PATENTED SLU
DGE-COKING PROCESS.
Comnent : SEC. I.E • THE MOBIL-PATENTED SLUDGE COKING TECHNIQUE IS UTILIZED AT OUR DELAYED COKING PROCESS UNIT.
18
MOSS-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 6,386,984.5 / 6.386,984.5 6,600,000.0 / 6,600,000.0 0,386,984.5 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : MAIN API SEPARATOR
1900
-------
,RS 91 Oversight
-------
BRS 91 Overs ig.
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND5RUH1.RPT
CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 13
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
. Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Comment : 1) REGARDING SEC. I,C • WELLS REGULATED BY LA DEPARTMENT OF NARTURAL RESOURCES (DNR).
2) WELLS BEING CLOSED IN 1992 IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAND BAN LAWS.
3) SEC. II. BOX B AND C ARE ESTIMATED. 4) SEC. II, BOX E - LIMITED FACTOR IS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
(CAN PLUG UELLSJ 5) SEC. Ill, BOX B,C,D,E • SEE COMMENT 2
LAD056024391 BP OIL COMPANY - ALLIANCE REFINERY
BELLE CHASSE
Source Code.
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B102-Inorganic Liquid
PROCESS WASTEWATER FROM OPERATING AREAS THAT CONTAIN
00071-43-2
3-TRI Constituent(s)
H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/5,339,961.0
D018
18 2911 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW * hon-Hll 5,339,961.0 2-No
GREATER THAN .5 PPM BENZENE
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
PS Page System
22~ M051-Energy Recovery 920.0 / 920.0 • 4,920.5 / 4,920.5 d,0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
23
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 04-Kiln, Furnace, or Boiler
Description : ENERGY RECOVERY OF D001 & D002 HYDROCARBON POLYMER MIXTURE BY BURNING IN ONSITE BOILERS
Comnent :
Ml24-0ther Trtmt 10,369.0 / 10',369.0 0.0/0.0 7,514.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Aval 1. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : PHASE SEPARATION OF OIL & WATER FROM K048, K049, K051 &
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
D018 SLUDGES TO CONCENTRATE SOLIDS. PROCESS TAKES PLACE IN
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 14
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
25
26
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
A SEPARATION TANK
• Comment :
H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 5.339,961.0 / 5,339,961.0 8,371,275.0 / 8,371,275.0 5,339,961.0 / 0.0
Sec.llI-A. Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF D018 WASTEUATER IN REFINERY WASTE- WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
Comment :
M131-Disposal 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0 97,900.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status ': 04-Under Construction ' •
Unit Type : OS-Land application/treatment
Description : 6 ACRE LAND TREATMENT UNIT/USED TO TREAT K048, K049, K050, K051, & K052 REFINERY WASTES (CURRENTLY UNUSED)
Comment i •
H131-Disposal 0.0/0.0 - 0.0/0.0 14,851.0/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change .Future Avail. Code , X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA ' '
Operational Status : 03-Permanently Closed . •
Unit Type , : OS-Land epplication/treatment
Description : 9 ACRE LAND TREATMENT UNIT/USED TO TREAT K048, K049, K050, , K051, & K052 REFINERY WASTES (CURRENTLY BEING CLOSED)
Coment , : SECTION II, E: THE LAND TREATMENT CANNOT BE USED •- IT IS
CURRENTLY UNDERGOING CLOSURE
5 2911 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-HW
MND006162820 ASHLAND PETROLEUM COMPANY ST. PAUL PARK
Source Code : A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : B113-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : PROCESS WASTEWATER WITH BENZENE CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE REGULATORY LIMIT OF 0.5 PPM.
2,618,015.0 2-No
-------
IRS 91 Oversight
lATE : 11/15/94
GH & PS Forms {As of 11/94)
Page 15-
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
Origin
Code •
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
comments :
.:AS Numbers : 00071-43-2 ' •
fRI Constituent : 1-No TRI Report
Jnslte Info (System/Qty) : M081 -Aqueous Organic Trtmt/2,618,015.0
Jaste Codes : D018
MND006162820 ASHLAND PETROLEUN COMPANY
ST. PAUL PARK
10 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
217.2 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
: A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
: CORROSIVE HYDROFLUORIC ACID FROM ALKYLATION PROCESS.
: SECTION IK: PER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH NR. SCALCUCCI. CAS NO. WAS'CHANGED FROM 'F664-39-3' TO '7664-39-3' (MLH/DPR
A) 08/20/92.
: 07664-39-3 . . '
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M121-0ther Trtmt/217.2
Waste Codes : 0002
PS Page
1
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
System
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 2.618,015.0 / 2,618,015.0 7,013,844.9 / 7,013,844.9 2,618,015.0 / 2,618,015.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
47.0 / 0.0
7.013,844.9 / 0.0
1994
1
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : OS-Planned, Not Constructed
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : PROCESS WATER WITH BENZENE (0018) CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE REGULATORY LIMIT OF (0.5 PPM) ENTER THE UASTEWATER TREATM
ENT PLANT AND IS BIOLOGICALLY...(CONTINUED IN COMMENTS).
Comment : (CONTINUED FROM WASTE DESCRIPTION)...TREATED IN THE FIRST TWO OF FOUR AERATED SURFACT IMPOUNDMENTS. SEC. (II.A.) ESTIM
SECTION 11A: ESTIMATES QUANTITY. SECTION IIIA: ASHLAND PLANS TO CLOSE THE FIRST TWO SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS AND UPGRADE EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS BY IMPLEMETING A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS: A
DAF UNIT FOLLOWED BY EITHER ROTATING SUBMERGED BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS, ACTIVATED CARBON SYSTEM OR A UASTEWATER STRIPPER.
ALSO BEING CONSIDERED AS PART OF WWTP DESIGN IS A CONVENTIONAL ACT1VIATED SLUDGE SYSTEM.
-------
,1RS 91 Oversight • CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE": 11/15/94 Page 16
file : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
SECTION IID: ESTIMATED WET TONS.
.1SD054179403 CHEVRON
source Code
Form Code
Jaste Description
coonents
CAS Numbers
rRI Constituent
onsite Info (System/city)
Waste Codes.
10 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
PASCAGOULA
A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B109-Inorganic Liquid
REACTIVE AND CORROSIVE SPENT TREATING CAUSTIC FROM THE PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
3-TRI ConstItuent(s)
M076-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/5,678.0
D002 D003 0010
6,293.6 2-No
MS0054179403 CHEVRON
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Coonents
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
PASCAGOULA
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish' ' '
BW-Inorganic Liquid . <
SPENT ACIDS AND ACIDIC WASTES FROM PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
N121-Other Trtmt/1,629.2
0002
13 2911 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-HW
1,629.2 2-No
NSD054179403 CHEVRON
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
PASCAGOULA
A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid
REFINERY WASTE WATER CONTAINING BENZENE
16 2911 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW & non-HW 6,575,256.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Overs Ij,
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 17 .
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
>°
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated -
Radio-
active
Comments " : •
CAS Numbers : 00071-43-2
TR1 Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : H081-Aqueous Organic Trtrnt/6,575,256.0
Waste Codes : D018
PS Page
"20!
21
22
System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M032-0ther Recovery 1,998.2 / 1.998.2 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
1,782.2 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
216.0 / 216.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status : 06-Other
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : OIL RECOVERY FOR HAZARDOUS OIL REFINERY WASTES
Comment :
N076-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : WET AIR OXIDATION AND NEUTRALIZATION OF SPENT TREATING CAUSTICS FROM PETROLEUM REFINING
Comnent ' : . .
N084-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 300,000.0 / 14.5 451,160.0 / 451,160.0 300,014.5 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : WET AIR OXIDATION OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS
Comment :
-------
dRS 91 Oversight - GM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
OATE : 11/15/94 Page IB
File : INDSRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
23
24
25
26
27
M125-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0 16,000.0 / 16,000.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 03-Pennanently Closed i
Unit Type : OS-Waste Pile
Description : UASTE PILE FOR THE STORAGE AND AIR OXIDATION OF REACTIVE
Comment : '
N131-Disposal 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
SPENT CATALYST FROM PETROLEUN REFINING
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory. Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 03-Permanently Closed
Unit Type : OS-Lend application/treatment09-Surface Impoundment
Description : LAND TREATMENT FACILITY FOR TREATING OILY REFINERY WASTES
Comment : NORTH LANDFARM
M131-Disposal 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of'Change Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 03-Permanently Closed
Unit Type : OS-Land application/treatment09-Surface Impoundment
Description : LAND TREATMENT FACILITY FOR TREATING OILY REFINERY WASTES
Comment : EAST LANDFARH
M076-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M121-Other Trtmt
01-RCRA
03-Pennanently Closed
09-Surface Impoundment *
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT FOR THE WET AIR OXIDATION 0F AQUEOUS
1,629.2 / 1,629.2
0.0 / Q.O
WASTES WITH HIGH CHEMICAL OXIDATION DEMAND
1,629.2 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Overall CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/1S/9o Page 19
File : INDSRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility Facility OH Origin
10 Name City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated, active-
Sec.l!l-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
28
29
30
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status .: 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operationat
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS FOR TREATING CORROSIVE HAZ. WASTES
Comment : ...
M125-0ther Trtrat 5.710.2/5,710.2 24,000.0/24.000.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Tear of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
5,710.2 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA ,
Operational Status t 02-Temporarily Idle
Unit Type : OS-Waste Pile
Description : WASTE PILE FOR THE OXIDATION OF REACTIVE SPENT CATALYST FROMPETROLEUM REFINING
Comment : . .
M032-0ther Recovery 1.600.0 / 4.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
6.300.0 / 6,300.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RECYCLING OILY HAZARDOUS WASTE BY REINTRODUCTIONS TO REFIN- ING PROCESS
Comment :
M08I-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 6,575,256.0 / 6.575,256.2 9,132,300.0 / 9,132.300.0 6,575,256.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) ' Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank .
Description : BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF AQUEOUS WASTES CONTAINING HYDROCARBONS
Comment * .
31 M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
10,654,350.0 / 175,340.2
16,700,000.0 / 1,000,000.0
10,829,690.2 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 20
File : INDSRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroletm Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name .
Sec.lll-A.
N
Men Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
City
Year of
Change
1900
CM
Page
Future Avail.
SIC
Code
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
X Future Capacity
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status : 02-NPOES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : REDUCTION OF CHROMIUM BY SULFIDES IN VASTEUATER TREATING
Comment : • . • '
SYSTEM
MDD0061 75467 AMOCO Oil CO
Source Code
Form Code
Uaste Description
Consents •
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Uaste Codes
IPANY-MANDAN REFINERY MANDAN 24 2911 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HU 683,544.0 2-No
ATS-Poll Ctrl or Uaste Trtmt
B101- Inorganic Liquid
REFINERY UASTEUATER.
00071-43-2
3-TRI Const ituent(s) '
N081 -Aqueous Organic Trtmt/683, 544.0 .
0018
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
20 H081- Aqueous Organic Trtmt 683,544.0 / 683,544.0 8.220,000.0 / 8,220,000.0 683,544.0 / 683.544.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
25
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : TREATMENT OF D018 UASTEUATER IN ENHANCED BIO-OXIDATION CELLS
Comment ':
M101-Sludge Trtmt 946.2 / 946.2 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
816.2 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
130.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
-------
BRS 91 Overs1&
DATE : 11/15/94
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 21
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active.
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Coninent
02-NPDES
06-Other
01-Tank
OEUATERING OF K049-K051 WASTES GENERATED FROM REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT.
SEC. I.D. PRESSING OPERATION PERFORMED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR- AS NEEDED.
OKD05807877S SUN REFINING t MKTG. CO. - TULSA REF.
TULSA
9 2911 5-Residual
4-After nix of HU I rton-HV
4.352,000.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
: A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: B102-Inorganic Liquid ' ' ,-
: PROCESS WASTE WATER FROM PETROLEUM REFINING. THIS CONTINUOUSSTREAM IS USUALLY CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS DUE TO
BENZENE.
Corments : SEC. I, BOX F CONTINUED: A34, A37, A09, A38, A03, ATS AND A76.
CAS Numbers : 00071-43-2 00078-93-3 00108-88-3 01330-20-7 07664-41-7
TR1 Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) :M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/4,352,000.0
Waste Codes : D018 . .
PS Page System
11~ M131-Disposal
Influent (Total/RCRA)
4.237.2 / 1.370.2
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
61,568.7 / 61,568.7
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 08-Land application/treatment
Description : LAND TREATMENT OF F037 SLUDGE, D018 SLUDGE, AND NON-
Comnent : SEC. !, BOX 8: PERMIT LIMITS ARE BASED ON ANNUAL OIL APPLI- CATION RATE. FIGURE SHOWN ASSUMES AN AVERAGE OIL CON-
TENT OF 10X BY WEIGHT IN SLUDGE.
HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM* REFINERY OILY SLUDGES, FILTER CLAYS AND
12
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 4.352.000.0 / 4,352,000.0 7,671.132.0 / 7,671,132.0 4,352.000.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
6.098.0 / 5,334.3
0.0 / 0.0
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
file : INOSRUN1.RPT
GH I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 22
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25
-------
aRS 91 Overs i i
DATE : 11/15/9-.
CM & PS forms (As of 11/94)
Page 23
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
01-Operatlonal
08-land application/treatment
LAND TREATMENT FACILITY FOR THE DISPOSAL OF WASTES
PAD049791098 CHEVRON USA
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
PRODUCTS COMPANY PHILADELPHI PHILADELPHIA 9 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
•
: A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: B103-Inorganic Liquid
: CORROSIVE WASTE GENERATED FROM THE VARIOUS REFINERY PROCESS VESSELS IN CAUSTIC TREATING SERVICE. SPENT CAUSTIC IS HAZAR
DOUS DUE TO ITS PH>12.5; ALSO WASTE OCCASIONALLY FAILS TCLP
: SEC I, A (WASTE DESCRIPTION) CONTINUED : ANALYSIS FOR ARSENIC AND SELENIUM (D004/D010)
SEC III. C : ALSO MOTS. M121 SEC I, K : CAS NUMBER 01)10-73-2 WAS REJECTED BY THE SYSTEM
SEC I. J : AS THERE WERE NO VALID CAS NUMBERS, THIS FIELD WAS CHANGED FROM A 3 TO Alt 8, TO ALLOW THIS REPORT TO PASS ITS
BASIC EDIT
1.571.0 2-No
: 8-Unknonn
: M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/520.0
: D002 0004 0010
PAD049791098 CHEVRON USA
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
Conments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
OnsIte Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
PRODUCTS COMPANY PHILADELPHI PHILADELPHIA 14 2911 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
: ATS-PolI Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
: B207-0rganic Liquid
: ALL PROCESS AND STORM WATER PROCESSED THROUGH.#4 SEPARATOR. THE WATER IS PUMPED DIRECTLY TO THE OXIDATION BIOLOGICAL T
REATMENT) TANKS AT THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
: SEC IV. B : SOURCE CONTROL TRAINING FOR OPERATIONS EMPLOYEES
: 00071-43-2
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
: MOai-Aqueous.Organic Trtmt/4,881,358.2
: 0018
4.881,358.2 2-No
-------
,RS 91 Oversight - CM I PS Forms (As of 11/94)
•ATE : 11/15/94 Page 24
lie : INOSRUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acillty
0
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
. active
iAD049791098 CHEVRON USA PRODUCTS COMPANY PHILADELPHI PHILADELPHIA
15 2911 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
7.321,524.8 2-No
ource Code
,arm Code
/aste Description
.:oonents
.AS Numbers
.Rl Constituent
insite Info (System/Qty)
Jaste Codes
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B207-0rganic Liquid
ALL PROCESS AND STORM UATER PROCESSED THROUGH «2B SEPARATOR THE WATER IS PUMPED TO X-106 SUMP AND THEN TO ROUGHING FILTE
RS AND PRIMARY CLARIFIERS FOR PRETREATHENT PRIOR TO
SEC I. A (WASTE DESCRIPTION) CONTINUED : BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT (OXIDATION TANKS)
SEC IV, B : SOURCE CONTROL TRAINING FOR ALL OPERATIONS EMPLOYEES
00071-43-2
3-TRI Constltuent(s)
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/7,321,524.8
: 0018
PS Page System
1 N042-lncineration
Sec.UI-A. New Max. Oper.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
8,330.0 / 1,509.0
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
89,425.0 / 26,600.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
1,368.0 / 1,368.0
Y 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1993
Unit Type
Description
Comnent
M121-Other Trtmt
: 03-Incinerator . _
: FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATOR WITH DRY CYCLONE AND WET GAS SCRUBBER (APCOS) TREATS API SEPARATOR SLUDGE, SLOTOIL EMULSION S
OLIDS (WHEN GENERATED) AND NON HAZARDOUS BIO-ALUM SLUDGE
: SEC II. B : MAXIMUM CAPACITY IS BASED ON MAXIMUM GPM OF ALL PERMITTED WASTE STREAMS. THIS INFORMATION WAS CALCULATED FR
OH OPERATING MANUAL (ORIGINAL). ACTUAL MAXIMUM CAPACITY IS LIMITED BY PADER AND EPA PERMIT
SEC II. C : NOT CALCULATED SEC III, B : NEW MAXIMUM CAPACITY WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER R
ECEIPT OF NEW PERMIT WITH METAL EMISSIONS ADJUSTED FEED RATES. TEST BURN CONDUCTED 6/91, 'WEI ARE WAITING FOR EPA RESPO
NSE .
4,685.0 / 4,685.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
3,560.0 / 3,560.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
4,685.0 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1900
-------
DATE : 11/15/94
File : INDSRUNI.K.-i
Page 25
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
M081-Aqueous Organic Trttnt 12,203,408.0 / 12,203,408.0 21,931,800.0 / 21,931,800.0 12,183,900.0 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capaelty
6,821.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPOES
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 01-Tank 10-Tank
Description : ALL PROCESS WATER AND MOST STORMUATER IS PROCESSED THROUGH THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PRIOff TO DISCHARGE UNDER AN NP
DES PERMIT. ALSO PROCESSED ARE SPENT CAUSTIC HEAT EXCHANGER
Conraent : SEC I, A (WASTE T.D.R SYSTEM DESCRIPTION) CONTINUED : BUNDLE CLEANING SLUDGE AND TC WASTE WATER
SEC II, A I APPROXIMATELY 40X OF THE TOTAL INFLUENT IS FROM NO. 4 SEPARATOR WHICH IS PROCESSED DIRECTLY TO THE OXIDATION
TANKS. THE OTHER 60X IS FROM NO. 2B SEPARATOR AND RECEIVES ADDITIONAL TREATMENT THROUGH THE ROUGHING FILTERS AND THE P
RIMARV CLARIFIERS SEC I, E : THE SYSTEM INCLUDES ROUGHING FILTERS (TRICKLING F
ILTERS), PRIMARY AND FINAL CLARIFIERS, OXIDATION (BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT) TANKS, AND SAND FILTERING PRIOR TO DISCHARGE
4 M051 -Energy Recovery 97,961.0/338.0 225,150.0/225,150.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
N 0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA . . '
Operational Status : 01-Operational .
Unit Type : 04-Klln, Furnace, or Boiler • ,
Description : OIL IS PUMPED FROM FUEL OIL STORAGE TANKS TO THE BOILER BURNERS, (6 OR 8, DEPENDING ON WHICH BOILER IS FIRING OIL) A CON
TROL VALVE REGULATES THE OIL PRESSURE TO THE BURNERS. AS
Comnent : SEC 1, A CONTINUED : THE OIL IS INJECTED INTO THE FIREBOX, IT IS ATOMIZED BY 200 POUND STEAM
SEC II, A : QUANTITY IS TOTAL OIL AND RCRA OIL CHARGED TO BOILERS IN 1991
SEC II, B : UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, 3 OF 4 BOILERS ARE BURNING GAS. OIL IS NORMALLY ONLY FED TO 1 BOILER FOR GAS HE
ADER CONTROL. THE MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL CAPACITY IS BASED OF FIRING ALL 4 BOILERS WITH OIL, AND THE BOILERS OPERATING AT
MAXIMUM STEAM OUTPUT. ALSO, THE MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL CAPACITY (RCRA) IS BASED ON TH
E ABILITY TO BURN 100X RCRA EXEMPT (D001, FLASH POINT <140F BUT GREATER THE 100F) OILS
Radio-
active
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : SPENT CAUSTIC MATERIAL (PH > 12.5) IS NEUTRALIZED WITH SULFURIC ACID TO LOWER Prt AND MAKE THE WASTE MATERIAL NOll HAZARDO
US PRIOR TO SHIPMENT OFF SITE. NEUTRALIZATION CAN TAKE
Comnent : SEC I, A (WASTE T.D.R SYSTEM DESCRIPTION) CONTINUED : PLACE IN-LINE (PRIOR" TO TANK) OR III TANK
SEC II. B : BASED ON MAXIMUM FILL OF TANK 1051 TO 39 FEET
PAD980550594 SUN COMPANY, INC. MARCUS HOOK REFINERY MARCUS HOOK
Source Code : A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
form Code : BK)2-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : REFINERY PROCESS.WASTE WATER CONTAINING A LOW LEVEL OF BENZENE
7 2911 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW I hon-HU 6,000,000.0 2-No
-------
,RS 91 Over's ight - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
-ATE : 11/15/94 Page 26
He : IND5RUN1.RPT
acUlty Facility
D Name
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
CM Origin
City Page SIC Code
i
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement • Generated active
oonents
: TREATMENT CONSISTS OF PH ADJUSTMENT, WASTE OIL RECOVERY AND DEWATERING
SEC II A • AMOUNT GENERATED FROM DATE TC RULE BECAME EFFECTIVE IN 1990. NOT A FULL YEARS AMOUNT
ONSITE SYSTEM 1 DELETED.
AS Numbers :
Rl Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
msite Info (System/Qty) : MOBS-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/6,000,000.0
laste Codes : D018
PS Page System
1 M085-Aqueous Organic Trtnt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Totat/RCRA)
6,000,000.0 / 6.000,000.0 18,000,000.0 / 18,000.000.0 6,000,000.0 / 6,000,000.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
2,000.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU , .
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description : AN EASTERN CHANNEL IMPOUNDMENT IS USED T6 CONVEY CON.WASTE WATERS CONTAINING BENZENE (D018) AND STORMWATER FROM PROCESS
UNITS AND OIL RECOVERY SEPEARATORS TO A FINAL OIL RECOVERY
Conment : . • -
RD090074071 PUERTO RICO SUN OIL CO.
YABUCOA
9 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2.509,382.6 2-No
.ource Code
.orm Code
.'aste Description
odroents
AS Numbers
.Rl Constituent
nsite Info (System/Qty)
.aste Codes
A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
8207-Organic Liquid
WASTEWATERS CONTAINING BENZENE
SEC. I BOX F: THESE UASTEUATER COMES FROM PETROLEUM
00071-43-2 00078-93-3 00108-88-3 07664-41-7
3-TRI Constituent(s)
H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/2,509,382.6
D018
REFINERY OPERATIONAL PROCESSES
-------
S 91 Oversight - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
TE : 11/15/94 Page 27
le : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
cility
PS Page
1
Facility
Name
System
H081- Aqueous Organic Trtmt
City
Influent (Total/RCRA)
2,509,382.6 / 2,509,382.6
CM Origin
Page SIC Code
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
5,331,005.0 / 5,331,005.0
Point of Measurement.
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
2,509,382.6 / 0.0
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 09-Surface Impoundment
Description . : UASTEUATERS AGRESSIVE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Comment :
Mill-Stabilization 169.9/169.9
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
572.0 / 572.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
282.9 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
1900
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-Operational
01-Tank
CEMENT BASED STABILIZATION OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
RD991291972 PHILLIPS PUERTO RICO CORE INC. GUAYAMA
1
ource Code : ATS -Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
or* Code : B219-0rganlc Liquid
aste Description : TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
6 2911 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW & non-HU
FOR BENZENEWASTEWATERS FROM. SANITARY, PROCESS (0018), STORHUATERS, BOILER
404,325.6 2-No .
aaments
AS Numbers
Rl Constituent
msite Info (System/Qty)
Jaste Codes
: SEC I BOX H, CONTINUED : B219-WASTEWATERS FROM SANITARY,
SEC II, BOX A AND B, CONTINUED: THESE AMOUNTS REFLECT THE
AND 1991, RESPECTIVELY. SEC IV, BOX B CONT. : W99-SOME
WASHINGS WERE REDUCED.
: 00071-43-2 00100-41-4 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
: H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/404,325.6
: 0018 '
PROCESS, STORMWATERS, BOILERS AND COOLING WATER SLOWDOWNS.
WATER DISCHARGED FROM OXIDATION POND DURING THE YEARS 1990
PROCESS WASTE STREAMS WERE ELIMINATED AND OTHER PROCESS
-------
,RS 91 Oversight
ATE : 11/15/94
ile : IND5RUN1.RPT
J4 & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 28
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
, acUity
lO
' Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement Generated
Radio-
active
•
•R0991291972 PHILLIPS PUERTO RICO CORE INC/
GUAYAMA
8 2911 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
33,626.9 2-No
iource Code
rorro Code
Jaste Description
laments
<:AS Numbers
TRI Constituent
onsite Info (System/Qty)
Jaste Codes
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B219-0rganic Liquid
TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP) FOR BENZENE. BALLAST WASTE WATERS GEN FROM VESSELS AND SHIPS.
THESE UASTEUATER ARE STORED IN THE BALLAST TREAAATMENT FAC.
SEC I., BOX H, CONT.: BALLAST WATERS GEN. FROM VESSELS AND AND SHIPS CONING FOR SERVICE TO THE PLANT.
00071-43-2
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M085-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/6.305.0
D018 .
PS Page
1
System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 404,325.6 / 404.325.6
Sec.III-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
680,356.4/680,356.4 404,325.6/0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
620,265.8 / 620,265.8
1994
1
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Cement
05-RCRA/NPDES
Q1-Operational
01-Tank 09-Surface Impoundment
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT COMPOSED OF VARIOUS UNITS INCLUDING TWO SURFACE IMPOUNTHENTS (ONE FOR TREATMENT & THE OTHER
AS STORAGE FAC.), TANKS (CLARIF1ER),PUMPS & SUMPS. THE PLANT
SEC. I, BOX E. CONT. : TWO RCRA SURFACE IMPOUNTMENTS, ONE FOR TREATMENT AND THE OTHER FOR STORAGE; AND TANKS, PUMPS
AND SUMPS EXEMPTED FROM RCRA. SEC. Ill BOX A, CONT: REPLACEMENT OF RCRA FACILITIES IS
BEING PLANNED. SEC II, BOX A AND C, CONT.: THESE AMOUNTS REPRESENT THE
TREATED WATERS . DISCHARGED DURING 1991. SEC III, BOXES B AND C, CONT.: THESE AMOUNTS ARE IN DRAFT
FORM, NOT FINAL. THIS DATA WAS REQUESTED BY EQB ON MARCH 11.1993INUED: THESE AMOUNTS ARE IN DRAFT FORM, NOT FINAL. THESE
DATA WAS REQUESTED BY EQB ON MARCH 11 1993. -
M085-Aqueous Organic Trtmt . 6,305.0 / 6,305.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
986,288.4 / 986.288.4 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity •
0.0 / 0.0
Y 986,288.4 / 986.288.4
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : 02-Temporarily Idle
1994
-------
S 91 Oversight
-IE : 11/15/94
.le : IN05RUN1.RPT
A & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 29
Comnent
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
icility Facility
) Name
Unit Type
Description
: 01 -Tank
: BALLAST WATER
City
CM
Page
09-Surface Impoundment
TREATMENT FACILITIES CONSISTING OF TWO (2)
Origin
SIC Code
RCRA (STORAGE) SURFACE
Point of
IHPONDHENTS,
Measurement
TANKS
(RCRA-EXEMPTED)
1991 Tons
Generated
t
Radio-
active
PUMPS AND SUMPS FOR WASTEWATERS CLASSIFIED AS D018(BENZENE
SEC. I, BOX B, CONT. : STORAGE FOLLOWED BY AIR FLOATATION. SEC I, BOX D, CONT. : DURING 1991, THE FAC. RECEIVED BALLAST
WATERS, BUTDID NOT TREATED THEM, JUST STORED. SEC II, BOX C.CONT. : THERE WAS NO DISCHARGE IN 1991, JUST STORING OF BALL
AST WATERS; SEC II BOX E CONT. : THE TWO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS ARE USED FOR BALLAST WATERS FROM SHIPS AND VESSELS COMING
WITH PRODUCTS TO THE PLANT. SEC III BOX A CONT. : NEW FACILITIES ARE BEING EVALUATED. SEC III BOX D CONT. : THE NEW
FACILITIES THAT ARE BEING PLANNED WILL CONTINUE SERVING TO VESSELS AND SHIPS THAT BRING SERVICE TO THE PLANT.
,(0008080533 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY
TEXAS CITY
2 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
11,688.7 2-No
jurce Code
orn Code
aste Description
oonents
AS Numbers
iRI Constituent
nsite Info (System/Qty)
aste Codes
: A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B109-Inorganic Liquid
CAUSTIC WASTES
8-Unknown '
M134-Disposal/3,348.7
D002
XD008080533 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY
TEXAS CITY
3 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
1,662,637.6 2-No
: A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: Bill-Inorganic Liquid
: SOUR WATER WITH H2S, PHENOLS, AND NH3
>ource Code
. on* Code
laste Description
:omnents ' :
AS Numbers :
iRI Constituent : 8-Unknown
msite Info (System/Qty) : M134-Disposal/1,657,039.1
laste Codes : 0003
(XD008080533 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY
TEXAS CITY
4 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
629.573.0 2-No
-------
RS 91 Oversight
•ATE : 11/15/94
ile : INDSRUN1.RPT
M & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 30
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acllity
lO
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
:ource Code
, orn Code
taste Description
:omnents
:AS Numbers
iRI Constituent
msite Info (System/Qty)
taste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
8102-Inorganic Liquid
WATER (BALLAST) FROM JANKERS/BARGES
8-Unknown . .
HOBI-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/629,573.0
D018
rXD008080533 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY
TEXAS CITY
5 2911 3-Mgmt of non-HW
8-Unknown
source Code
form Code
iJaste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-lnorganic Liquid
WATER, STORM RUNOFF FROM LANDFILL AREA
8-Unknown :
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/5,945,954.0
0018
5,945.954.0 2-No
1X0008080533 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY TEXAS CITY
Source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code ' : B102-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : WASTE WATER, INDUSTRIAL CONTAINS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Conments . : '
CAS Numbers :
6 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
19,123,022.0 2-No
-------
,RS 91 Oversight >>N & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
ATE : 11/15/94 Page 31
tie : IN05RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining!1 Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
acility
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
iRI Constituent : 8-Unknown
insite Info (System/City) : H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/18.533,550.0
Jaste Codes : D018
M137-Disposal/589,472.0
fXD008080533 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY
TEXAS CITY
9001 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
source Code
rorra Code
.
-------
8RS 91 Oversigh j
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND5RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 32
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Description :
Comment :
157 M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 629,573.0
Sec.lU-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status :. -
Unit Type :
Description :
Coonent :
158 H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 5,945,954.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
159 H081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 19,123,022.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status :~ •
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comment :
160 M051-Energy Recovery 0.0 / 50,696.5
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change.
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity'
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
!S 91 Oversight .
-------
RS 91 Oversight
.ATE : 11/15/94
ile : IN05RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 34
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
.acility
10.
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
Origin ' .
Code '
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active •
rni Constituent
: 8-Unknown
Jnsite Info (System/Oty) : M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/11,203.0
M124-0ther Trtmt/162.0
H089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/813.0
Jaste Codes
: DOIK
rXD048210645 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM SWEENY COMPLEX
OLD OCEAN
2 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
7,497,320.0 2-Mo
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A09-Cleaning I Degreesing
B101-Inorganic Liquid
WASTEWATER
8-Unknown
M089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/7.488,295.0 M124-0ther Trtmt/9,025.0
N133-Disposal/139,903.5
0018
TXD048210645 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM SWEENY COMPLEX
OLD OCEAN
4 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
Source Code
Fora Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A09-Cleaning ( Degreesing
B201-Organic Liquid
PETROLEUM/ PETROCHEMICAL, MISC. , WASTES
8-Unknown
M089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/1,226.0 M124-0ther Trtmt/831.0
0018
2,573.0 2-No
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
-------
RS 91 Oversight ,,
ATE : 11/15/94
, ile : IND5RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 35
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
31
33
34
M089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 7,489,114.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status :
Unit Type. : -
Description :
Comnent :
H124-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 9,025.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comnent :
M089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 1,226.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max.Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0/0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPOES
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Comnent . :
M124-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 831.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type :
Description :
Comnent . :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
35 H089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt
0.0 / 614.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
-------
,S 91 Oversight
,TE : 11/15/94
ite : IND5RUN1.RPT
A 8 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 36
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
icility
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Foint of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
37
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
~~0.0 / 0.0• ' - ' ,
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status :
Unit Type : -
Description :
Conment : , .
M124-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 162.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status :
Unit Type : •
Description :
Conment :
M089-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 0.0 / 813.0
•Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 05-RCRA/NPDES
Operational Status : -
Unit Type : •
Description :
Conment :
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
X future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1X0051161990 CHAMPL1N REFINING AND CHEMICALS, INC. CORPUS CHRISTI
.ource Code
.orm Code
laste Description
Comments
:»S Umbers
(Rl Constituent
A49-other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid
UASTEWATER, PROCESS
8-Unknown
2 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
3,151,965.4 2-No
-------
SRS 91 Oversig! GN ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 37
File : IND5.RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility '
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
onsite Info (System/Qty) : HOB1-Aqueous Organic Trtnt/3,151,965.4
Waste Codes : D018 > • •
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
DCD059685339 MCKEE PLANTS/DIAMOND SHAMROCK
SUNRAY
source Code ;
Form Code
Waste Description,
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A49-Other than Surface Prep end Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid
WASTEUATER, REFINERY
8-Unknown
M129-0ther Trtmt/1,531,420.0
D018
1 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
1,531,420.0 2-No
rX0059685339 MCKEE PLANTS/DIAMOND SHAMROCK
SUNRAY
source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
FRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A76-PoU Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B205-Organic Liquid
UASTEUATER FROM OIL SEPARATION
8-Unknown
M129-0ther Trtmt/1,044.9
D018
2 2911 5-Residual
8-Unknonn
. 1,044.9 2-No
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
-------
-------
us yi uversigni UN & KS forms (AS or ii/v.j
ATE : 11/15/94 Page 39
ile : 1ND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleun Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
acility
D
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991.Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
nsite Info (System/Oty) : Hl21-0ther Trtmt/540.0
aste Codes : D002
XD990709966 THREE RIVERS REFINERY
THREE RIVERS
ource Code
orm Code
aste Description
omnents
AS Numbers
it I Constituent
nsite Info (System/Oty)
laste Codes
A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B102-Inorganic Liquid
UASTEWATER
8-Unknoun
M124-0ther Trtmt/615,439.9
0018
2 2911 1-On-site activity 8-Unknoun
615.439.9 2-No
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
ITD007064447 AMOCO OIL COMPANY REFINERY
CASPER
3 2911 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HU & non-HU 1,568,312.0 2-No
. ource Code
orm Code
(aste Description
:omnents
AS Numbers
,RI Constituent
insite Info (System/Qty)
laste Codes
PS Page System
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt '
B102-Inorganic Liquid
WASTEWATER, EXEMPT FROM RCRA REGULATIONS PER 40 CFR 264.1. GGENERATED FROM A REFINERY OIL-WATER DEPARATOR AND CONTAINING
BENZENE.
WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE TO RCRA EXEMPT POTW. *
00071-43-2 00091-20-3 00100-41-4 00108-88-3 01330-20-7
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M082-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/1,568,312.0
D018
8 H083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
1,568,312.0 / 0.0
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
4,362,480.0 / 4,362.480.0
. Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1,568,312.0 / 0.0
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
-------
:S 91 Oversigh X & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
aE : 11/15/94 Page 40
ile : IND5RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Petroleum Refining" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
icility
i •
Faci I i ty
Name
Sec.llI-A.
City
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
GH
Page
Future Avail.
SIC
Code
Origin
Code Point of Measurement
X Future Capacity
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RCRA-EXEMPT AIR STRIPPING OF REFINERY UASTEUATER FOR
Comment :
PRETREATMENT PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO A POTU.
-------
ATTACHMENT 14-2
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO BRS DATA
-------
14-2-1
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Amoco Oil Company - Mandan Refinery
DATE: 12/12/94
CONTACT NAME: Edward Foy
»
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 701-667-2553
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management
• This facility generates ICRT wastes from:
-Spent caustics processes - reactive sulfides
-Blowdown - light hydrocarbons
• The RCR A waste codes that these wastes carry are:
D001, D002, and D018
• The quantity of wastes generated are:
The facility could not provide any figures at the time of the interview
• The wastes contain the following UTS constituents:
Benzene - concentration not available at the time of the interview
L;;ad (after bio-ponds) - 1.3 ppm
• How these waste streams are managed:
-This facility aggregates their streams
-On-site wastewater treatment system includes API separator and bio-
oxidation ponds
-This facility uses land-based units
o Bio-oxidation ponds are used at the facility
o None of the land-based units are Subtitle C surface impoundments
o The quantity of sludge generated was not available at the time of the
interview
o The sludge is not a toxicity characteristic waste
o The land-based units do not leak or leach into underlying or
surrounding soils
o The contact could not provide the concentration of the total volatile
organic compounds (VOC) in the wastewaters in the land-based
units
o Lead - <.002 ppm
-The facility has tested for 44 UTS constituents all of which were
non-detectable
-------
. 14-2-2
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• The facility would re-pipe and/or modify the system by installing an above ground
sewage facility, if they were required to segregate and treat (or pre-treat) their
wastes to. underlying UTS constituents
• Possible modifications to implement alternative treatment systems were estimated
to cost 100 million dollars over a one or two year period *
• There were no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available on-
site
Waste Discharge Agreement
• This facility is a direct discharger through an NPDES permit.
The constituents and the standards that the NPDES permit regulates are:
(the facility was unable to-provide permit limits)
BOD
COD
NH3
Nitrogen
pH
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others.
• The contact could not answer whether there were any wastes that were not
covered in the NPDES permit.
Special Wastes ,
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes.
-------
14-2-3
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Amoco Oil Company Refinery
DATE: 12/8/94
CONTACT NAME: Robert Breuer
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 307-261-4345
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Did not want to participate in the interview .
-------
14-2-4
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Champlin Refining and Chemicals, Inc.
DATE: 12/7/94
CONTACT NAME:. Kevin Kenall
»
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 512-844-5314
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management
• This facility generates ICRT waste from:
-Desalters
-BTX units - benzene, toluene, and xylene are extracted
-Tank drawdowns
• The RCRA waste code that these wastes carry is:
D018 i
• The quantity of wastes generated is:
D018 - 2,492,950 tons
• The wastes contain the following UTS constituent:
Benzene
• How these waste streams are managed:
-The waste streams are aggregated in the equalization tanks
-On-site treatment includes .bio activated sludge units, dissolved air
flotation, and steam stripper \
-No land-based units are used
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• The facility would re-pipe/modify their current wastewater treatment system, if the,y
were required to segregate and treat (or pre-treat) their wastes for underlying UTS
constituents
• Possible modifications to implement alternative treatmeni systems would cost 5 to
10 million dollars over a two year period
• . There are no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available on-site
Waste Discharge Agreement
• This facility is a direct discharger under an NPDES agreement.
-------
14-2-5
• The constituents and the standards (Ibs/day) that the NPDES permit regulates are
(monthly average):
BOD 750 Sulfide 2.6
TSS 748 Phenol 3.3
COD 5810 Chromium 0.16
Oil/Grease 275 Hexachromium 0.13
NH3 . 194
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others.
• There are no pollutants in the wastewater that are not addressed in the NPDES
permit.
Special Wastes
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes
-------
14-2-6
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Chevron
DATE: 12/6/94
CONTACT NAME: Wallace Calhoun
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 601-938-4694
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management
This facility generates ICRT wastes from:
-Spent caustics from various processes
The RCRA waste codes that these wastes carry are:
D002 and D018
The quantity of wastes generated was 3,165,864 tons in 1993
The wastes contain the following UTS constituent:
Benzene
How these waste streams are managed:
-This facility does not aggregate their streams
-On-site treatment system includes API separator, dissolved air flotation,
induced air flotation, and activated biological sludge unit
-This facility uses land-based units
o Three lagoons and one aeration lagoon are used at this facility
o None of the land-based units are Subtitle C surface impoundments
o The quantity of the sludge generated was not provided by the contact
o The sludge is not a toxicity characteristic waste
o The facility is investigating whether the land-based units leak or leach
into underlying or surrounding soils
o the concentration of the total volatile organic compounds (VOC) in
the wastewaters in the land-based units was not detectable
o The facility cannot provide UTS constituent and concentration data
for wastewaters entering the land-based unit because the data were
not available at the time of the interview
Additional/Alternative Treatment
The facili'y would re-pipe/modify their current wastewater treatment system, if they
were required to segregate and treat (or pre-treat) their wastes for underlying UTS
constituents
-------
14-2-7
Possible modifications to implement alternative treatment systems would cost two
or three hundred million dollars and would take years..
There were no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available on-
site
Waste Discharge Agreement
This facility is a direct discharger to the Mississippi Sound through an NPDES
permit.
The constituents and the standards (ppm) that the NPDES permit regulates are
(based en a flow rate of nine million gallons/day):
BOD 43 Phenol 0.2
TSS 35 Chromium 0.2
COD 305 Hexavalent chromium 0.02
Oil/Grease 12 Zinc 0.6
NH3 21 Nickel 0.09
Sulfide 0.2 '
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others.
• The contact could not answer whether there were any wastes that were not
covered in the NPDES permit.
Special Wastes
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes
-------
14-2-8
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Crown Central Petroleum Corporation
DATE: 12/7/94
CONTACT NAME: John Jones ^
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 713-920-3930
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management
• This facility generates ICRT waste from:
-Water draws on tanks
-Crude desalter
-Draining of vessels for maintenance activities
• l eaks and spills
• The RCRA waste code that these wastes carry is:
D018
• The quantity of wastes generated is:
D018 - 2,100,000 gallons/day .
• The wastes contain the following UTS constituent:
Benzene
• How these waste streams are managed:
-The waste streams are aggregated and treated before being discharged to
thePOTW
-On-site wastewater treatment system includes a corrugated plate
interceptor and an oil/water separator
-No land-based units are used
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• The facility was uncertain if they would re-pipe/modify their treatment system, if
they were required to segregate and treat (or pre-treat) their wastes for underlying
UTS constituents
• The facility was unable to provide a cost or time estimate for any modifications
• There are. no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available pn-site
Waste Discharge Agreement
• This facility discharges to a POTW through a POTW permit
-------
14-2-9
• The constituents that the POTW permit regulates are:
(the facility was unable to provide permit limits).
TSS
Chemical oxygen
Metals
Organics
NH3 ^
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others.
• The facility was uncertain if any pollutants in the wastewater are not addressed in
the POTW permit.
Special Wastes
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes
-------
14-2-10
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Koch Refining Company
DATE: 12/8/94
CONTACT NAME: Stoney Vining
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 512-242-8327
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management •
• This facility generates ICRT waste from general refining units
• The RCRA waste code that these wastes carry is:
D018
• The quantity of wastes generated is:
D018 - 3,000,000 tons/year .
• The wastes contains the following UTS constituent:
Benzene
• How these waste streams are managed:
-The waste streams are aggregated and treated before being discharged to
a nearby snip channel
-On-site (tank-based) wastewater treatment system includes API separators,
grid chamber, dissolved air flotation unit, and aeration tank
-No land-based units are used
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• The facility would re-pipe/modify their current wastewater treatment system, if they
were required to segregate and treat (or pre-treat) their wastes for underlying UTS
constituents
• • The facility estimates that these modifications would cost 10 to 40 million dollars
and take one and one-half years to complete
• There are no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available pn
site.
Waste Discharge Agreement
• The facility is a direct discharger to a nearby ship channel through an NPDES
permit
-------
14-2-11
• The constituents that the NPDES permit regulates are:
(the contact was unable to provide permit limits):
General volatile organic compounds (VOC)
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others.
• There are no pollutants that are not addressed in the NPI^ES permit
Special Wastes
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes
-------
14-2-12
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Sun Company Incorporated
DATE: 12/6/94
CONTACT NAME: Michael Manigly
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 215-339-7492
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management
• This facility generates ICRT wastes from:
-Spent caustics from various processes
• The RCR A waste codes that these wastes carry are:
D002andD018
• The quantity of wastes generated are:
D002 - 2000 tons
D018 - quantity not available at the time of the interview
' • The wasrrs contain the following UTS constituent:
Benzene
• How these waste streams are managed:
-The waste streams are aggregated in the separators
-On-site wastewater treatment includes an activated biological sludge units
-No land-based units are used
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• The contact did not feel any modifications were necessary
• There were no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available on-
site
Waste Discharge Agreement
• This facility is a direct discharger to the Schuylkill River through an NPDES
agreement.
• The constituents and the standards (mg/1) that the NPDES permit regulates are:
BOD5 27 Aluminum limit not given
TSS 30 Chromium 0.16
COD 284 Hexachromium 0.13
Oil/Grease 12 Zinc 0.6
-------
14-2-13
NH3 22 Cyanide limit not given
Sulfide 0.21 Phosphorus limit not given
Phenol 0.14 BOD 89.25%
TRO 0.2 pH 6-9
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others. *
• The contact could not answer whether there were any wastes that were not
covered in the NPDES permit.
Special Wastes
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes
-------
14-2-14
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Total Petroleum Incorporated
DATE: 12/8/94
CONTACT NAME: Greg Brown
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 316-442-5100x5674
ICF CONTACT NAME: David Bell
Waste Generation and Management
This facility generates ICRT waste from:
-Crude units
-Sour water stripping tower
-Vacuum units
-Hydrocracker
-Reformers
The RCRA waste code that these wastes carry is:
D018
The quantity of wastes generated is:
D018 - 1,200,000 gallons/day
The wastes contain the following UTS constituent:
Benzene
How these waste streams are managed:
-The waste streams are aggregated and treated before being discharged to
a neighboring stream
-On-site (tank-based) wastewater treatment system includes bio activated
sludge unit and sour water stripping .tower
-No land-based units are used
Additional/Alternative Treatment
The facility would re-pipe/modify their current wastewater treatment system, if they
were required to segregate and treat (or pre-treat) their wastes for underlying UTS
constituents
The facility estimates that these modifications would cost 7 to 10 million dollars
and take two years to complete
There are no alternative treatment systems available or soon to be available on
site.
-------
14-2-15
Waste Discharge Agreement
• The facility is a direct discharger to a neighboring stream through an NPDES
. permit
• The constituents that the NPDES permit regulates are:
(the contact was unable to provide permit limits):
Oil and grease *
TOC
Hydrocarbons - petroleum chemicals
• The facility does not use indicator or surrogate chemicals to represent the
presence of others.
• Benzene is not specifically addressed in the NPDES permit
Special Wastes
• This facility does not generate any "special" wastes
-------
ATTACHMENT 14-3
COMMENTS TO THE PROPOSED PHASE III RULE
-------
14-3-1
PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
DATA OBTAINED FROM COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED PHASE III LDR RULE
Commenter(s)
Comment Number(s)
Type Of Data
Issue Supported By Data
Sun Company Inc.
Exxon Company USA
Mobil Oil Corporation
American Petroleum Institute (API)
National Petroleum Refiners Association
Chevron
Texaco
Phillips
23
42
60
87
90
91
Waste stream
constituents
Wastewater
management
Petroleum refining consists of a sequence of processes
vliicl. convert crude oil or other hydrocurnor: into ;; :,lat.'
of products consisting primarily of fuels. In order to
maximize the amount of product .produced from each
barrel of crude, any hydrocarbons that can be recovered,
including hydrocarbons in the wastewater collection
system, are captured and reused as a feedstock.
Consequently, several petroleum refining commenters have
indicated that the point of generation (POG) for streams
in the wastewater collection system which have recoverable
hydrocarbons does not occur before the point at which
recovery of hydrocarbons for reuse ceases. Texaco further
reports that the actual percentage of recoverable oil is on
average close to 1% (10,000 ppm), and they suggest that
EPA seems to believe that the percentage of oil in refinery
process waters is between 1 and 100 ppm. The American
Petroleum Institute (API) maintains that many refining
processes discharge water to process sewers. However,
because of the Benzene Waste NESHAP (BWN), many
sources of oil to the process sewer, and water streams with
.elatively high levels of constituents have been segregated
from the, sewer. Since the relatively highly concentrated
streams have been segregated from the sewer, this has
reduced the variation of constituent concentrations being
managed in the sewer system. As a result, these
commenters feel that it makes sense to attach LDRs after
similar streams have been aggregated.
-------
PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
DATA OBTAINED FROM COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED PHASE III LDR RULE (cont'd.)
Commenter(s)
Comment Number(s)
Type of Data
Issue Supported by Data
BPOil
27 (Page 3)
27 (Page 6, Table 1)
Influent water quality
Stormwater Pond Sludge
BP oil states that stormwater impoundments do not pose
sufficient risks to require replacement. The commenter indicates
that the influent water quality is expected to be in the range of
0.16 - 0.3 mg/1 benzene which is well below TC levels, but higher
than UTS levels, at least for initial periods of flow. Stormwater
pond sludge sampling data provided by BP Oil shows that all
constituents are below UTS levels.
Shell Chemical
Company
111 (Page 2)
111 (Page 2)
Concentration of
chemicals in process
wastewater
Concentration of
chemicals expected in
stormwater impoundments
after dilution
Shell states that stormwater impoundments receiving water with
previously characteristic waste during storm events should be
exempt because these impoundments manage extremely small
amounts of process wastewater and, therefore, pose negligible
risks. The data provided by the commenter also indicates that
process wastewater samples exceeding UTS levels before
commingling with stormwater fail to achieve UTS levels even
after dilution in stormwater impoundments (Dilution factors of 1
to 5 and 1 to 20). However, the commenter states that all
stormwater that is commingled with untreated process wastewater
is treated prior to discharge.
Exxon Company,
U.S.A
21 (Page 3, Table
1.A.4)
21 (Page 9, Table
1.D.1)
Stormwater impoundment
management data
Costs for closing
stormwater impoundments
Exxon Company provides data on the size of stormwater
impoundments located at its four refineries. According to Exxon
Company, the size of the impoundments (45 acres) makes any
regulation requiring additional controls very costly. Exxon
Company provides data to show that replacing stormwater
impoundments with tanks would incur a^ipital u>st of $70
million and an operating cost of $4 million/year fpr the next 30
years. Exxon Company also provides data for the percentage of
time for which stormwater meets CWA discharge permit
parameters without treatment. According to the data, stormwater
at two of the three refineries meets CWA standards at least 90
percent of the time, while a third refinery meets standards 50
percent of the time. The commenter also provides data to show
that the stormwater impoundments are at minimum levels at least
70 percent of the time and, therefore, the chances of stormwater
leaching to the groundwater are very low.
-------
PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY
DATA OBTAINED FROM COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED PHASE HI LDR RULE (cont'd)
Commenter(s)
Comment Number(s)
Type of Data
Issue Supported by Data
API
42 (Appendix A)
42 (Appendix B)
Facility sampling data for
ABT units
Biodegradability of BTEX
in ABT units
API conducted sampling and analysis on wastewaters from ABT
units to test the effectiveness of ABT. The sampling data
demonstrates extremely effective treatment of UTS constituents.
Only one organic constituent, benzo (g,h) perylene was detected
above the UTS (11 ppb compared to a UTS level of 5.5 ppb).
Also, the data showed only one instance when a UTS metal was
detected above the UTS level in the effluent from the ABT.
Based on the data, API suggests that ABT should be designated
fcs BOAT. API also provides data to show that organic
constituents are destroyed, and not volatilized, in ABT units.
API provides graphs showing, that, depending on the type of
ABT unit and its operating parameters, the fraction of BTEX
compounds biodegraded can exceed 99 percent.
BPOil
27 (Page 7, Table 2)
Facility sampling data for
ABT units (dewatered
biosolids)
BP Oil participated in the API data collection program and has
submitted.additional data with its comment. The data confirms
that ABT reduces constituents in refinery wastewaters to below
UTS levels. Therefore, BP Oil suggests that ABT should be
specified as the BOAT.
Exxon Company,
U.S.A
21 (Page 13, Table II.E)
Costs for closing Exxon's
ABT units
Exxon Company provides cost estimates for closure of ABT
units and surface impoundments and their replacement with
tanks. According to E>xon, this option would cost $600 million
with ongoing costs of $60 million/year for 30 years. Exxon
indicates that costs of this magnitude would seriously jeopardize
the economic viability and continued opgr^ion of Exxon's
facilities and would provide minimal risk mitigation. Therefore,
Exxon suggests that ABT should be designated as the BOAT.
Environmental
Technology
Council (ETC)
69 (Attachment 69A)
Evaluation of
biodegradability of UTS
constituents in industrial
wastewater treatment
lagoons
ETC opposes the propos«,l to establish ABT as the BOAT. ETC
provides results of a study conducted to determine the
effectiveness of biological treatment and states that biological
treatment provides low reduction efficiencies for many common
petroleum waste constituents.
-------
CHAPTER 15
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
15.1 INTRODUCTION
This analysis of required treatment capacity of the pharmaceutica^industry was developed
to support today's proposed rule. The following sections are presented: nummary of findings
(Section 15.2); background on the pharmaceutical industry (Section 15.3); waste types potentially
subject to this rule (Section 15.4); available data on wastes generated and managed at
pharmaceutical facilities (Section 15.5); and an analysis of required treatment capacity for the
pharmaceutical industry (Section 15.6).
15.2 SUMMARY
The pharmaceutical industry includes facilities that are primarily engaged in
manufacturing, fabricating, or processing medicinal chemicals and pharmaceutical products. This
industry also includes facilities that are primarily engaged in the grading, grinding, and milling of
botanicals or the preparation of cosmetics that function as skin treatment. This industry does not
include facilities that are only engaged in pharmaceutical research. A summary of the estimated
impact of today's proposed rule is presented in Exhibit 15-1.
EXHIBIT 15-1
MAJOR FINDINGS FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Discharge
Mode
Direct
Indirect
Zero
Total
Number of
Facilities
34
336
190
560
Total Wastewaters
Mixed With ICRT
Wastes (million
tons/yr)"
42
88
80
220
Facilities
Without
RCRA-
equivalent
Treatment"
4
44
25
73
Facilities
with Land*
based Units8
24
47
61
132
Affected
Facilities8
0 to 3
0 to 6
0 to 8
Oto 17
Affected
Wastewater
(million
tons/yr)a
0 to 12.0
0 to 1.6
Oto 3.4
Oto 17
The quantities in. this column were determined on an aggregated basis and apportioned to the direct, indirect, and
zero dischargers based on the percentage of each discharge mode.
-------
15-2
A recent public meeting on the pharmaceutical industry1 indicated that most pollutants
found in the wastewaters generated and managed by the pharmaceutical industry will be
adequately addressed in the upcoming proposed rule on revised effluent limitations guidelines.
This rule is expected to be proposed in February 1995 and finalized in February 1996. Assuming
that, at the minimum, all priority pollutants will be addressed by this revised rule on effluent
guidelines limitations, EPA assessed the maximum impact of today's proposed rule by estimating
the land-based units that may process non-priority pollutants having end-M-pipe concentrations
above UTS levels. However, if an upcoming rule on revised effluent limitations guidelines
addresses all pollutants that exceed their UTS, then the pharmaceutical industry may not be
significantly affected by today's proposed rule.
The primary assumptions used by EPA to estimate the number of facilities and wastewater
volumes that may be affected by today's proposed rule are presented below. Refer to Section
15.6 for further details on the data and assumptions used in this analysis.
• To estimate the number of facilities that may use land-based units, EPA assumes
that the general type of units used in the pharmaceutical industry are similar to
those in the organic chemicals manufacturing facilities (see Chapter 3).
/
• As indicated by the analysis conducted using the questionnaire and sampling data,.
13 percent of the facilities with land-based units may be affected by today's
proposed rule.
• The limited analysis conducted on the questionnaire and sampling data indicated
that up to two facilities with 10.8 million tons of wastewater may be affected by
today's proposed rule. Considering the volume of wastewaters generated, EPA .
assumes that both these facilities are direct dischargers. While estimating the total
volume of wastewaters at direct dischargers affected by today's proposed rule, EPA
used this volume estimate for two facilities; and for the rest of the facilities, EPA
used average wastewater flows to estimate the affected volumes of wastewater.
Using these assumptions, EPA estimates that up to 17 facilities and 17 million tons of
wastewater per year generated by the pharmaceutical industry will be affected by this rule.
15.3 BACKGROUND2
The pharmaceutical industry includes facilities that are primarily engaged in
manufacturing, fabricating, or processing medicinal chemicals and pharmaceutical products. This
industry does not include facilities that are only engaged in pharmaceutical research. Specific SIC
codes include:
1 U.S. EPA, 1994 (June 15), "Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry, Effluent Limitations Guidelines
and Standards," handout distributed for public meeting on May 23, 1994.
2 Most of this section is summarized from U.S. EPA, 1983 (September), Development Document for
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Point Source Category,
Office of Water, Document No. 440/1-83/084. It is important to note that processes and data may have
changed since the writing of the document.
-------
15-3
SIC 2831 - Biological Products: Establishments primarily engaged in producing bacterial and
viral vaccines, toxoids and analogous products (such as allergenic extracts), serums,
plasmas, ajid other blood derivatives for human or veterinary use.
SIC 2833 - Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products: Establishments primarily engaged in
(1) manufacturing bulk organic and inorganic medicinal chemicals and their
derivatives; and (2) processing (grading, grinding, and milling) bulk botanical drugs
and herbs. Also included are establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing
agar-agar and similar products of natural origin, endocrine products, manufacturing
or isolating basic vitamins, and isolating active medicinal principles such as
alkaloids from botanical drugs and herbs.
SIC 2834 - Pharmaceutical Preparations: Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing,
fabricating, or processing drugs in pharmaceutical preparations for human or
veterinary use. The greater part of the products of these establishments are
finished in the form intended for final consumption, such as ampuls, tablets,
capsules, vials, ointments, medicinal powders, solutions, and suspensions. Products
of this industry consist of two important lines: (1) pharmaceutical preparations
promoted primarily to the dental, medical, or veterinary professions, or (2)
pharmaceutical preparations promoted primarily to the public.
The pharmaceutical industry also .includes the following:
• All fermentation, biological and natural extraction, chemical synthesis, and
formulation products that are considered pharmaceutically active ingredients by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and that are not covered by SIC codes
2831, 2833, or 2834;
• Cosmetic preparations covered by SIC code 2844 that function as skin treatments;
and
• The portion of a product with multiple end uses that is attributable to
pharmaceutical manufacturing either as a final pharmaceutical product, component
of a pharmaceutical formulation, or a pharmaceutical intermediate.
The pharmaceutical industry does not cover cosmetic preparations such as lipsticks,
mascara, perfumes, colognes, deodorants, and shaving preparations that do not function as skin
treatments. This industry specifically excludes surgical and medical instruments and apparatus,
orthopedic, prosthetic, and surgical appliances and supplies, dental equipment and supplies,
medical laboratories, dental laboratories, outpatient care facilities, health and allied services,
diagnostic devices, animal feeds which include pharmaceutically active ingredients such as vitamins
and antibiotics, and foods and beverages which are fortified with vitamins or other
pharmaceutically active ingredients.
Most of the pharmaceutical industry is located in the eastern half of the United States.
New Jersey accounts for 16 percent of the facilities and EPA Region II accounts for over a third
of the facilities. The pharmaceutical industry can be categorized into the following categories
based on distinct differences in manufacturing processes, raw materials, products, and wastewater
characteristics and treatability:
-------
15-4
Subcategory A - Fermentation;
Subcategory B - Biological and natural extraction;
Subcategory C - Chemical synthesis; and
Subcategory D - Formulation.
Several facilities in the pharmaceutical industry use more than one manufacturing process
and can be categorized in more than one Subcategory. However, subcat^ory D (formulation) is
the most prevalent manufacturing process with approximately 65 percent of the facilities
conducting this operation. Furthermore, 58 percent of the pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities
only conduct subcategory D operations.3 All of the four subcategories involve batch, continuous,
and semi-continuous manufacturing operations, with the batch:type production accounting for
approximately 87 percent of all operations.4
Due to the variety of products and the number of process variations, the pharmaceutical
industry utilizes a vast array of raw materials and processing agents. Chemical materials are
extensively used as reactants, extractive solvents, catalysts, inhibitors, diluents, and for other
purposes. The raw materials and processing agents used by the different operations conducted at
pharmaceutical industries are discussed below:
• . Fermentation: Fermentation operations use large quantities of nutrient materials
such as carbohydrates and proteins. Other materials that enter the fermentation
process include (1) metals that are used as reaction modifiers and processing
agents in the fermenter and (2) organic solvents that are used as extractive agents
for product separation and purification. '
• Biological and natural extraction processes: These processes can have a wide
variety of feedstocks including roots, leaves of plants, animal glands, or parasite
fungi. Organic solvents such as benzene and chloroform are used for extraction.
• Chemical synthesis: This uses the widest range of feedstocks in the pharmaceutical
industry. Organic solvents are liberally used in the synthesis since the solvents are
relatively inexpensive as compared to the products. Other additives that may
contain metals are used to control reactions during the synthesis.
• Formulation: Product recovery and purification processes used to produce
Pharmaceuticals including some formulation operations require the extensive use
of solvents and extractive agents that may contain metals. The organic compounds
used include methylene chloride, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and chloroform.
15.4 WASTE TYPES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY TODAY'S RULE
The wastewaters generated by the pharmaceutical industry contain several caustic, organic,
and metal components. The wastewater characteristics and pollutant loadings vary with the
.3 U.S. EPA, 1982 (November), Economic Analysis of Proposed Effluent Standards and Limitations for
the Pharmaceutical Industry, Office of Analysis and Evaluation, Document No. 440/2-82-013. .It is
important to note that processes and data may have changed since the writing of the document.
4 U.S. EPA, 1983 (September), op. cit.
-------
15-5
manufacturing operations generating the wastewaters. The flow and composition of wastewaters
discharged from a pharmaceutical facility can be highly variable .as a result of three common
practices found in the pharmaceutical industry: campaigning, batch processing, and wastewater
commingling.
Many different pharmaceutical products are manufactured during different campaigns.
Campaigns are limited production efforts in which specific products are rfenufactured. Between
campaigns, the process equipment must be cleaned to avoid contamination between processes.
Thus, changeovers produce wastewaters whose composition depends on the product manufactured
on that process line. Batch-type production is the most common manufacturing operation used by
the industry. Often, many different batch operations are running simultaneously in separate
vessels. The timing, composition, and concentrations of wastewater discharges vary between
individual batches, contributing to the variability of wastewaters produced by a facility. Lastly,
commingling of wastes is a typical practice of pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities and adds to
the variability of wastewaters. Often, organic-contaminated wastes from different processes will
be mixed in order to accumulate a sufficient amount for the economical operation of a particular
treatment unit, such as a steam stripper.
The wastewater treatment processes generally used for treating the wastewaters generated
by the different manufacturing processes include primary clarification, equalization, neutralization,
activated sludge treatment, and aeration. Some of this treatment may be conducted in land-based
units. The specific manufacturing operations, the wastewaters generated, and the typical
wastewater treatment are discussed below. Sections 15.5 and 15.6 address these wastes and
management practices in more detail, including the degree to which the wastes may ultimately be
affected by today's proposed rule.
15.4.1 Fermentation
Fermentation is the basic processing method used for producing most antibiotics and
steroids.. The. fermentation operations are generally conducted on a batch basis. The batch sizes
are generally very large for these operations and, hence, these operations generate large
quantities of wastewaters. The specific steps employed in this operation are seed preparation,
fermentation, and product separation. Exhibit 15-2 presents the processes generally employed in
fermentation.
• Seed preparation: Spores from the plant master stock are activated with water,
nutrients, and heat The seed tanks are emptied, sterilized, and reinoculated only
when contamination occurs. This process is not expected to produce any
contaminated wastes.
• Fermentation: This step involves the use of a water wash and steam sterilization
of the fermenter vessel prior to the addition of sterilized nutrient raw materials.
Microorganisms are transferred from the seed tank to the vessel to begin
fermentation. After the fermentation period of twelve hours to a week, the
fermenter batch whole broth is filtered to remove mycelia (remains of the
microorganisms). .
• Product recovery: There are three common methods of product recovery: solvent
extraction, direct precipitation, and ion exchange or adsorption. In solvent
extraction, organic solvents such as methylene chloride, benzene, chloroform, 1,1-
-------
EXHIBIT 15-2
TYPICAL FERMENTATION PROCESS
Vint
Saad
Raw
Matarlah
•
CQ2 1 *
Saad 1
Tank , 1—
Farmantatlc
Tank
— »•
MtihSuilltatron 1
Tank
Sterile .
i
ii
Ml
Math
Traaimant
Tank
Mr
'Mill
Vacuum
FHlar
I
Spant
Baar
•
..
fcrubbar
1
i
Fa«ka|lnf
Icnibbar
'wr
i
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 16), Estimates of Waste Generation by the. Pharmaceutical Industry, Final Drafl Report.
-------
15-7 .
dichloroethylene, and 1,2-dichloroethylene are used to remove the pharmaceutical
product from the fermenter broth. With subsequent extractions, the product is
separated from any contaminants. Further removal of the product from the
solvent can by done by either precipitation, solvent evaporation, or further
extraction processes. Normally, most of the solvents used in the process are
recovered and reused. Direct precipitation consists of first precipitating the
product from the aqueous broth, using solid materials sucr? as ion exchange resins,
adsorptive resins, or activated carbon. The product is then recovered from the
solid phase with the use of solvents, after which the product is recovered from the
solvent.
Wastewaters generated by the fermentation step include spent beers from the filtration
process. The wastewaters also includes water from steam used for sterilization of most equipment
and from air pollution control equipment used to deodorize off-gases. Steam is often used in
conjunction with chemical disinfectants, such as phenol. The liquid from liquid scrubbers may
contain adsorbed chemicals, light soluble organic compounds, and heavier insoluble organic oils
and waxes. Most of the wastewater is generated during the fermentation and product recovery
steps. During the product recovery steps, solvents are used in solvent extraction and ion
exchange or adsorption. The most commonly used solvents in solvent extraction are acetone,
methanol, isopropanol, ethanol, amyl alcohol; and methyl isobutyl ketone. Direct precipitation
using heavy metal precipitating agents is a recovery process which results in wastewaters
contaminated with metals. Zinc and copper are priority pollutants used in direct precipitation. In
general, fermentation plants produce wastewaters with high pollutant loadings and relatively large
flows. In a typical treatment train, many of the wastewaters from the fermentation process are
corrosive. These wastewaters are usually combined with other wastewaters from other
manufacturing operations and sent for biological treatment.
15.4.2 Biological and Natural Extraction
Biological or natural extraction is used to remove therapeutic biological products from
natural sources such as plant parts (e.g., roots or leaves), animal parts (e.g., glands), or parasitic
fungi (e.g., molds). A biological product is any vims or bacterial vaccine, therapeutic serum, toxin,
antitoxin, blood derivative, or analogous product applicable to the prevention, treatment, or cure
of diseases or injuries in man. The two major production processes in the biological group are
blood fractionation and vaccine production. The products are then extracted using solvents.
• Blood fractionation: Numerous methods are used to refine and fractionate blood.
This involves the separation of the plasma and the subfractionation of the
precipitates.
• Vaccine production: Vaccine production is generally lengthy and involves
numerous batch operations. The primary unit operations include mincing,
centrifugation, incubation, freezing, and drying. Wastes associated with this
process include spent media broth, waste gags, and bad batches of production seed
or final product. Exhibit 15-3 presents the processes generally employed in vaccine
production.
• Extraction: Solvents are used in two ways in extraction operations. First they are
used to remove fats and oils that would contaminate the products. These
"defatting" extractions use organic liquids that dissolve the fat but not the product
-------
EXHIBIT 15-3
TYPICAL VACCINE PRODUCTION PROCESS
HARVESTED. MINCED
TRVPSINIIEDTO
INDIVIOIIALCfUS
CENTRIFUGE
CELLS
RESUSPENDED
CELLS
BOTtLED
INCUBATE
CELLS
SUPERNATANT
WASTED
SEED CELLS
WITH VIRUS
SEED
INCUIATE
ADD FRESH
MEDIUM
RB-INCUBATE
HARVEST
FLUIDS
FREIIS
HARVEST
60
VENT
• WASH
WATER
THAW VIRUS
SUSPENSION
AND CLARIFY
DRYING
PACKAOINQ
AND
LABELING
STORAGE
AT4°C
SPENT
-•to. WASH
WATCH
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 16), op. cit.
-------
15-9
material. Solvents are also used to extract the product itself. Most extraction
processes practice solvent recovery and recycle.
The principal sources of wastes from the biological/natural extractions are spent raw
materials, flow and equipment washdown,, chemical wastes, and spills. Solvents used in the
extraction are recovered and recycled and solvent content in wastewaters depends on the extent
and recovery of recovery operations. Generally, wastewater from these operations are
characterized by low pollutant loadings, small flows, and a pH range of approximately 6.0 to 8.0.
The wastewaters from the production of the biological products can also be flammable.
15.4-3 Chemical Synthesis
Chemical synthesis is utilized widely in the manufacture of many drugs. Most production
is in batch reactors that can be used for a wide variety of process steps, including heating, cooling,
mixing, evaporating, condensating, crystallizing, and extracting. The various steps involved in
chemical synthesis include the preparation of the feedstock, the chemical reaction, the separation
of the reaction products, and the final purification of the desired product. Each product is usually
manufactured in a campaign in which one or more of the process units are employed for a few
weeks or months to manufacture enough compound to satisfy the projected sales demand. At the
end of the campaign, the same equipment is.cleaned and used to manufacture a different product.
Exhibit 15-4 presents the processes generally employed in chemical synthesis. . • -
Waste from the chemical synthesis operations include spent solvents, mother liquor,
filtrates, equipment washdown, spills, and batch process residues. Wastewaters are generated as a
result of filling and emptying of batch reactors, process wastes, pump seal water, wet scrubber
spent water, and spills. Wastewaters from cleaning batch reactors contain small amounts of the
unreacted raw materials and some solvents. The effluent from the chemical synthesis operations
is the most complex to treat due to the variability of the feed and processes employed.
Wastewaters are generally characterized as having high pollutant loadings, large flows, and highly
variable Ph values, ranging from 1 to 11.0.
15.4.4 Formulation
Formulation involves the mixing, compounding, and other formulation of pharmaceutical
to produce readily useable forms such as tablets, capsules, liquids, and ointments. In this process
active ingredients are physically mixed with filler, formed into dosage quantities, and packaged for
distribution. Exhibit 15-5 presents the processes generally employed in formulation processes.
Wastewaters from these operations are generated by floor and equipment washing, wet
scrubbers, spills, and laboratory wastes. These operations generate low volumes of wastewaters
with low pollutant loadings that are readily treatable by biological treatment systems. Most of the
wastewaters are corrosive.
15.4.5 Wastewater Treatment
Wastewater treatment involves in-plant treatment and end-of-pipe treatment. In-plant
treatment processes are used to treat specific pollutants in segregated waste streams while the
end-of-pipe treatment processes are usually designed to treat a number of pollutants in the plant's
overall wastewater discharge. In-plant treatment includes cyanide destruction technologies such as
chlorination, ozonation, and alkaline hydrolysis; metals removal technologies such as chemical
-------
EXHIBIT 15-4
TYPICAL CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS PROCESS
HEUUO
IV>
I T
RAW
MATERIAL*
MECYCLID
SOLVENT!
Ml* "
MATERIAL!
i
RAW
V— » iATCH
01
»-«»™|aS
•* ' ' '
1 I-
HATER MOTHER
TO HTP LIQUOR
TO SALT
PLANT
MA
RECYCLED • '
RAW SOLVENT!
TIHIALS 1
•ATCH
PROCESSES
SYNTHESIS
- I 1
PROCESSES
: ~*" INTERMEDIATE H
•RINE
TO SALT
PLANT
REUSED 1
T 1
». RECOVERY
DISTILLATION
"f * bUST
A L . COLLECTOR
•AWN RECOVERY
OXIDATION bRVINQ
WATER 1 ' WATER . WATER 1
TOWTP f TOWTP TOWTP \
RESIDUE " IRINI
TO DUMP .TO SALT
PLANT *
RAW
MATERIALS
T 1
| STHIPPINQ
WASTI
INEAT
DUST . .
COLLECTOR
_ PIIODUCT PRODUCT
V*
o
STENT. .
SOLVENTS
SOLVENT
RECOVERY
DISTILLATION
RECYCLED
'SOLVENTS
MATERIALS
DERIVATIVES
<
DRYER 1 °UU
0"TEfi JoBLllCTOH
rnooucT
• '" *
WATER
TOWTP
AIR
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 16), op. cit.
-------
EXHIBIT 15-5
TYPICAL PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION PROCESSES
TAILCT PRODUCTS
.WATCH • 1
WCIOH i ^1 ,
INORCDICNTll ^1*
1
WASH
WATCH 1
LIQUID PRODUCTS
COOLING WAS*
WATCH WATC
AMPULI PRODUCTS
GLASS ^ GLASS
UNPACK ^ WASH
1
WASHWA
WATIR ; WATIR
J J
1 1 i
•WIWI i .-• fcl GHANU-
•xmu | P-| UT|OM
WASH WASH
•ATM WATIH
, • WATIR
T
i
1 WASH
M WATIR
-4
STCRILIfC
OCPVROQCNATI
TIR > WASH WATIR
W/
f
W
WATIR
1
WASH
WATIR
— L
|K
IJHAI
.
t '• 1
ITCH ''• WATCH WATCH
i r i
i -I i •:
IASH .WA>H WASH _
ATCR "ATCR WATCR f
• i
WATCR : , . • •
I '
\
WASH . '
WATCR
yen 1 ' |^™~~" 1
9LUTIONI . l^1*-1"1! ^ •**
1
V V
in if Aim ffAwiffAit"
• *
WATCH
FILM „ WASH
COATINQ WATCH
J
ACKAQINO|« WATCH
|
WASH
WATCR
-
STCAM CONDCNSATC
I i HCTURN
*«
1
1 INSPCCT 1
Source: U.S. EPA, 1987 (November 16), o/>. cit.
-------
15-12
reduction, alkaline precipitation, and sulfide precipitation; solvent recovery and removal; steam
stripping; and carbon adsorption. These processes are generally conducted in tanks.
End-of-pipe treatment includes primary, biological, and tertiary treatment processes. The
primary treatment processes include screening, primary sedimentation, primary chemical
flocculation/clarification, and dissolved air flotation. The biological treatment processes include
trickling filters, treatment in lagoons, activated sludge treatment, and rotaung biological
contactors. The tertiary treatment includes thermal oxidation and evaporation. Other end-of-
pipe treatment processes include equalization, neutralization, and polishing. The end-of-pipe
treatment processes are generally conducted by the direct dischargers.
These treatment processes are used to control biological oxygen demand (BODe), total
suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and Ph. At the time the CWA
regulations were promulgated (the development document detailing the regulations is dated
September 1983), the other priority pollutants measured in the wastewaters were not addressed
due to the following reasons: (1) pollutants are effectively controlled by technologies set by other
effluent limitations guidelines, (2) pollutants were detected in trace amounts and were expected to
neither cause nor be likely to cause toxic effects, (3) pollutants were present in amounts too small
to be effectively reduced by technologies known to EPA, or (4) pollutants were detected at only a
small number, of sources within a category and were uniquely related to the source.
The available data indicate that over 50 percent of the wastewaters are strong acids or
alkaline wastes and that another 36 percent of the wastewaters are ignitable.
15.5 AVAILABLE DATA
Several data sources were used for obtaining information on the generation and
management of the wastes generated by the pharmaceutical industry. A description of the data
sources is given in Chapter 3 of the main text of the background document The applicable
information obtained from these data sources is provided in the sections below.
15.5.1 Effluent Guidelines Development Document . ,
The development document6 for the effluent limitations guidelines for the
pharmaceutical industry covered the 466 pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities that were
operating at the time of the compilation of the document The document presented waste
characterization data on priority pollutants, but did not present any data on non-priority
pollutants. The maximum detected priority pollutant concentrations in the effluent wastewaters
are presented in Exhibit 15-6. The development document indicated that, of the 466 facilities, 55
were direct dischargers, 277 were indirect dischargers, and 134 were zero dischargers. The report
also indicated that the total direct and indirect discharge flows were 68 million and 72 million tons
per year, respectively.
5 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), Report to Congress on the Discharge of Hazardous Wastes to Publicly
Owned Treatment Works, Office of .Water. It is important to note that processes and data may have
changed since the writing of the document
6 U.S. EPA, 1983, op. cit
-------
15-13
EXHIBIT 15-6
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS IN EFFLUENTS3
Pollutant
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
1 -2-Dichloroethane*
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
'Bis(2-chloroethyl)
ether
Chloroform*
1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene*
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Ethylbenzene*
Methylene chloride*
Bromoform
4-Nitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Phenol*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
UTS
(mg/1)
0.14
0.057
0.21
0.054
0.054
0.033
0.046
0.025
0.036
0.032
0.057
0.089
0.63
—
0.28
0.039
0.28
Maximum
Level (mg/1)
0.12
0.016
0.5
0.033
0.014
0.02
0.11
0.18T
0.015
0.014 .
0.16
2.6
0.044
0.015
0.015
0.12
0.068
Pollutant <
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-ethyl phthalate
. Tetrachlorqethylene
Toluene*
Trichloroethylene
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
UTS
' (mg/1)
0.057
0.20
0.056
0.080
0.056
1.9
1.4
0.82
0.69
2J7
0.69
0.15
3.98
0.82
0.43
1.4
2.61
Maximum
Level (mg/1)
0.015
0.02
0.018
1.35
0.011
0.09
0.03
0.002 „
0.04
0.3
0.4
0.001
0.3
0.056
0.04
0.029
0.4
3 U.S. EPA, 1983 (September), op. tit.
Concentration exceeds UTS.
As is indicated by Exhibit 15-6, the maximum concentrations of several underlying
hazardous constituents in the wastewaters that may be managed in land-based units are above the
UTS levels set by the Phase II LDRs. The data, however, were not sufficient to identify specific
facilities and specific wastewater volumes that may be affected by today's proposed rule.
-------
15-14
15.5.2 POTW Report to Congress (RTC)
The 1986 RTC7 evaluates the types, sources, and quantities of hazardous wastewaters
that are discharged to POTWs. The report indicated that there were a total of 465 facilities, of
which 54 facilities were direct dischargers, 279 facilities were indirect dischargers, and 134 facilities
were zero dischargers. These numbers match those indicated by the development document8
since the original data source was the same for both of these documents*The report presented
some characterization data for pollutants found in wastewaters discharged to POTWs. The
primary shortcomings of this report for the purposes of this analysis are that it concentrates on
total mass loadings instead of concentrations and does not provide any data on the use of land-
based units. The total indirect discharge flow indicated by the POTW report is 72 million tons
per year. This agrees with the wastewater volumes indicated by the development document.9
The POTW report also indicated that over 50 percent of the wastewaters are strong acids or
alkaline wastes and that another 36 percent of the wastewaters are ignitable. The POTW report
presented data on wastewater characteristics that indicated the presence of several constituents
above the UTS levels set by the Phase II LDRs. Exhibit 15-7 presents the typical characteristics
of wastewaters discharged to POTWs from pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities.
15.53 Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
Data from the 1991 BRS were extracted to determine what types of affected wastes are
generated by the petroleum refining industry. EPA obtained data for the top 25 waste generators
who treat ICRT wastes on site. (See Attachment 15-1.) A few facilities were selected for follow-
up on their BRS data submissions. This information is discussed in Section 15.5.8.
15.5.4 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
EPA has reviewed the TRI and did not find any applicable information for this analysis.
15.5.5 Permit Compliance System (PCS)
EPA's PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit-holding facilities. PCS tracks
publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) and other direct dischargers to surface water bodies,
but not indirect dischargers (i.e., dischargers to POTWs).
EPA found that less than 3 of the 41 pharmaceutical manufacturing direct dischargers
providing information on their treatment types used one of the treatment types that indicated the
potential use of a land-based unit. Many sites did not report their treatment type in the PCS and
not all potentially affected facilities are included in the database. Also, some of these sites may
not generate today's proposed rule wastes. These factors' lead to uncertainty in the use of. these
data; however, this information provides perhaps an order of magnitude range for the number of
pharmaceutical facilities that EPA can expect to use land placement.
7 U.S. EPA, 1986, op. cit.
8 U.S. EPA, 1983, op. cit.
9 U.S. EPA, 1983, op. cit.
-------
15-15
EXHIBIT 15-7
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF POLLUTANTS IN
WASTEWATERS DISCHARGED TO POTWS3
Constituent
1,1-DichIoroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane*
Acetone*
Arsenic
Benzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Brompform
Cadmium
Chlorobenzene*
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chromium
Cyanide .
Dimethyl Phthalate
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Ether*
Lead
Mercury*
Methylene Chloride
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Toluene*
Xylene*
Zinc*
Discharge to POTW Maximum*
Concentration (mg/1) *
0.012
0.281
19.0
0.1
0.0058
0.019
0.325
0.1
0.083
0.012
0.05
0.11
0.002
. 0.043
0.041
0.775
0.42
0.7
0.013
0.6
0.034
0.0616-
5.648
. 1.000
4.76
UTS Concentration
(mg/l)
0.059
0.21
0.28
1.4
0.14
0.28
0.63
0.69
0.057
0.046
0.19
2.77
1.2
0.047
0.057
0.12
0.69
0.15
0.089
3.98
0.82
0.43
0.08
0.32
2.61
a U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), op. cit.
Concentration exceeds UTS.
-------
15-16
15.5.6 Industrial Subtitle.0 Screening Survey
EPA has reviewed the Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey and did not find any
applicable information for this analysis.
15.5.8 Industry Contacts
In order to better understand the generation and management of wastewaters at
pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities, EPA contacted facilities to follow-up on their BRS data
•submissions. This follow-up information indicated that several pollutants found in wastewaters
may not be addressed by the NPDES or POTW permits. Most of the facilities have not analyzed
for the underlying hazardous constituents in their wastewaters. The information obtained is
summarized in Exhibit 15-8. Detailed information obtained from the facilities is provided in the
form of telephone logs in Attachment 15-2.
EXHIBIT 15-8
SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE LOGS FOR THE
PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Company Name
Eli Lilly and Co. -
Tippecanoe Labs.
Mallinckrodt S.C.C.
Raleigh PLT
Sanofi Diagnostics
Pasteur, Inc.
1CRT
Wastes
Yes
Yes
NA
Land-
Based
Units
No/?.
NA
NA
Constituent
Concentrations
above UTS
NA
NA
NA
Quantity
Discharged
NA
- NA
NA
Direct
Discharger
Yes
No
No
Indirect
Discharger
No
No
No
Zero
Discharger
No
No
No
NA - Not available
15.5.9 Comments to Previous Rules
EPA has reviewed the comments to previous rules and did not find any applicable
information for this analysis.
15.5.10 Analysis of the Data Collected for the Effluent Limitations Program
In order to better characterize the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry and its
wastewaters for the effluent guidelines limitations, EPA has conducted several data collection
efforts. Section 15.6 presents an analysis of the data presented below and Attachment 15-3
presents the results of the analysis. These data collection efforts are briefly described below:
-------
15-17
Questionnaires
EPA has been collecting data on the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry since 1975.
These data have included information on manufacturing processes, water use, wastewater
characteristics, and treatment technologies in the industry. In 1986, the available data were
reviewed and areas where additional data were needed were identified. To fill the identified data
gaps, surveys and questionnaires were conducted by EPA. The 1989 Pharmaceutical Screener
Questionnaire and the 1991 Detailed Questionnaire identified 304 pharmaceutical manufacturing
facilities that used solvents and discharged wastewaters. Furthermore, a patent search was
conducted to determine which facilities used solvents during production.
EPA distributed the Screener Survey in May 1989 to 1,163 known or suspected
pharmaceutical manufacturers. Approximately 560 pharmaceutical manufacturers were identified
from the responses. In September 1991, EPA sent the Detailed Questionnaire to 280 facilities
requesting data for operations conducted during 1990. Of these 280 facilities, 245 were deemed
eligible. EPA received responses from 244 of the 245 eligible facilities. Of the 35 plants that
were not eligible, 12 were closed and 23 were exempt from responding because they no longer
manufactured pharmaceutical products. The results from the questionnaire are contained in a
CBI and non-CBI version of the pharmaceuticals database on the EPA mainframe.
Sampling Program
To complete data gaps identified during the 1986 information review, 13 facilities were
sampled between 1986 and 1991. The objectives of the sampling effort were threefold:
characterize the pollutants in the wastewater discharged at direct and indirect discharging
facilities; obtain treatment system performance data for biological treatment systems; and collect
treatability data from distillation (steam stripping) units. Samples were analyzed for the presence
and concentrations of all pollutants on the "Industrial Technology Division (ITD) List of
Analytes."
The Industrial Technology Division (ITD) List of Analytes was derived from the
ITD/RCRA List of Lists. Analytes on the ITD/RCRA List of Lists were included on the ITD
List of Analytes except:
• Analytes that appear only on the "Acutely Toxic Chemicals List" in EPA's
Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program (VTOX list), including:
Analytes that hydrolyze or are destroyed by water;
Analytes that are designated for analysis solely by high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC);
Analytes that must be analyzed by a subset of their chemical structure or
derivatized (except for the phenoxy acid herbicides that are analyzed by
Method 615); and
Analytes for which no analytical standard is available.
• For analytes that hydrolyze, the hydrolysis product is included (if an analysis type
and standard are available).
• Metal salts that are included as the metal (e.g., beryllium, iron, sodium) and as the
anion (e.g., F, S', CN')-
-------
15,18
15.5.11 Other Data Sources
Effluent guidelines summary statistics for the pharmaceutical industry were developed for
a pharmaceutical manufacturing industry public meeting.10 There are approximately 560
facilities in the pharmaceutical industry. Approximately 60 percent of the pharmaceutical facilities
are indirect dischargers. Only 6 percent of the pharmaceutical facilities are direct dischargers and
the remaining facilities (34 percent) are zero dischargers. Several faciliti« in the pharmaceutical
industry use more than one manufacturing process and can be categorized^in more than one
subcategory. However, subcategory D (formulation) is the most, prevalent manufacturing process
with approximately 58 percent of the pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities conducting only
subcategory D operations. The public meeting also indicated that, in addition to the priority
pollutants, several non-priority pollutants that may be found in the effluents will also be addressed
by the upcoming rule on revised effluent limitations guidelines.
EPA also reviewed industry comments on related rules, such as the Phase II Rule, the'
Emergency Rule, and the Notice of Data Availability for information regarding the management
of wastes at pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities. However, EPA did not find any data that
would support this analysis. .
15.5.12 Comments on the Proposed Phase III LDR Rule
According to comments received on the Phase III LDR proposed rule, the pharmaceutical
industry generates wastewaters with similar UHCs (e.g., organic solvents) from different
manufacturing processes at the same facility. The industry believes that it is more appropriate to
be able to aggregate these waste streams and evaluate them for hazard characteristic and the
applicability of LDRs at the point that the aggregated stream leaves the manufacturing process.
Nevertheless, EPA has not addressed this issue in this rule. The summary of one comment from
this industry is given in Attachment 15-4.
15.6 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS
EPA expects to propose a new rule on revised effluent limitations guidelines for the
pharmaceutical manufacturing industries. This rule is expected to be proposed in February 1995
and finalized in February 1996. Assuming that, on the minimum, all priority pollutants will be
addressed by this revised rule on effluent guidelines limitations, EPA assessed the maximum
impact of today's proposed rule by estimating the land-based units that may process non-priority
pollutants having end-of-pipe concentrations above UTS levels.
The total direct and indirect discharge flows indicated by the development document11
were 68 million and 72 million tons per year, respectively. EPA modified these using data
developed for a public meeting (see above) to estimate that the current direct and indirect
discharge flows are 42 million and 87 million tons per year, respectively. EPA then estimated t.he
total zero discharge flow to be 80 million tons per year based on average direct and indirect
discharge flows.
10 U.S. EPA, 1994, op. cit.
11 U.S. EPA, 1983,op. cit.
-------
15-19
EPA had conducted a limited analysis of the impact of today's proposed rule using the
questionnaires and sampling data that are mentioned in Section 15.5.10. The approach for
identifying facilities in the pharmaceutical category that would likely be affected by today's
proposed rule was developed as a result of numerous discussions with the effluent guidelines
development project teams regarding the data that were collected and how they are currently
managed in the CBI and non-CBI versions of the pharmaceutical database. Due to the type of
data collected/available, point-of-generation information on the constituents present and the
physical parameters of the wastewaters were not available. This analysis ^as mainly used for
estimating the percentage of facilities with land-based units that have wastewaters with underlying
hazardous constituents at concentrations above the UTS levels.
The discussions with the effluent guidelines development project teams resulted in a series
of queries and assumptions being applied to the data based on industry .knowledge designed to
estimate the number of facilities in the affected universe. The queries and assumptions used are
described below and the detailed results of the analysis are presented in Attachment 15-3:
Step 1: Identify the treatment steps that could occur in a land-based unit and query the
database for those facilities that use those treatment steps. Assumption: Aerated
stabilization basins and wastewater stabilization ponds' are the treatment steps
likely to occur in a land-based unit.
Step 2: Query end-of-pipe data to identify the constituents present that are not priority
pollutants, but are a UTS constituent. For each pollutant identified, calculate the
end-of-pipe concentration (mg/1) and end-of-pipe flow rate. Assumption: All
priority pollutants will be addressed in the upcoming rule on revised effluent
guidelines limitations.
Step 3: Compare end-of-pipe concentration to UTS levels.
Using the data and assumptions mentioned above, EPA found that several facilities have
non-priority pollutants at concentrations higher than the UTS levels. This analysis indicated that
there are approximately 15 pharmaceutical facilities that use treatment types indicating the
presence of land-based units. Of these, two pharmaceutical facilities (or approximately 13 percent
of the facilities with land-based units) with a total wastewater volume of 10.8 million tons per year
may be affected by today's proposed rule.
However, this analysis may underestimate the actual number of pharmaceutical facilities
that use land-based units. This is because one of the assumptions used in this analysis that
aerated stabilization basins and wastewater stabilization ponds are the only treatment systems
likely to occur in a land-based unit — to identify facilities that use land-based units, would exclude
facilities (e.g., zero dischargers) that may use land-based units for purposes other than treatment
(e.g., evaporation).
EPA used the following assumptions and steps to estimate the number of facilities and
wastewater volumes that may be affected by today's proposed rule.
• To estimate the number of facilities that may use land-based units, EPA assumes
that the general type of units used in the pharmaceutical industry are similar to
those in the organic chemicals manufacturing facilities (see Section 4.3.3). Using
-------
15-20
this assumption, EPA estimates that approximately 24 direct dischargers, 47
indirect dischargers, and 61 zero dischargers use land-based units^.
• As indicated by the analysis conducted using the questionnaire and sampling data,
13 percent of the facilities with land-based units may be affected by today's
proposed rule. Accordingly, EPA estimates that up to 17Jacilities (or 13 percent
of the 132 facilities using land-based units) will be affected by today's proposed
rule. EPA used the same percentage to estimate the direct, indirect, and zero
dischargers that may be affected by today's proposed rule.
• Considering that the wastewaters generated at facilities without land-based units
are similar to fhose generated at facilities with land-based units, EPA assumes that
13 percent of the pharmaceutical facilities have constituents above UTS levels.
• The limited analysis conducted on the questionnaire and sampling data indicated
that up to two facilities with 10.8 million tons of wastewater may be affected by
today's proposed rule. Considering the volume of wastewaters generated, EPA
assumes that both these facilities are direct dischargers. While estimating the totaj
volume of wastewaters at direct dischargers affected by today's proposed rule, EPA
used this volume estimate for'two facilities; and for the rest of the facilities, EPA
used average wastewater flows to estimate the affected volumes of wastewater.
Using these assumptions, EPA estimates that up to 17 facilities and 17 million tons of
wastewater per year generated by the pharmaceutical industry will be affected by today's proposed
rule. However, a recent public meeting on the pharmaceutical industry12 indicated that, in
addition to the priority pollutants, several non-priority pollutants that may be found in the
effluents will also be addressed by the upcoming rule on revised effluent limitations guidelines.
Hence, if the revised effluent limitations guidelines also address all the non-priority pollutants that
exceed their UTS levels, then the pharmaceutical industry may not be affected by today's
proposed rule.
12 U.S. EPA, 1994, op. cit.
-------
ATTACHMENT 15-1
BRS DATA
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE i 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
uM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 1
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
• Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
CTD097730709 BOEHRINGER INGELHEIH PHARH INC
RIDGEFIELD
7 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
79.2 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Conments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A99-Other Processes
B109-Inorganic Liquid
ACID CAUSTIC WASTEWATER FROM THE REGENERATION OF ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND LABORATORY WASTE
SEC I H ALSO B104 SEC IF ALSO A94 ALL QUQNTITIES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY.ALL FIGURES HAVE BEEN ROUNDED OFF
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtmt/79.2
D002
PS Page System
12 M121-0ther
Sec. 1 11 -A.
N
Regulatory
Operational
Unit Type
Description
Conment
Influent
Trtmt 42,118.4
New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
0.0 /
Status
Status
(Total/RCRA)
/ 79.2
Year of
Change
Max
152
Future
:' Oper
,210.2
Avail
. (Total/RCRA)
/ 0.0
. Code
X Future
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
42,
Capacity
118.4 / 0.0
0.0 1900
03-POTW
01 -Operational
01 -Tank
NEUTRALIZATION OF ACID/ALKALINE UASTEWATER IN FOUR ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS
SEC MAC TOTAL INFLUENT AND TOTAL EFFLUENT ARE ESTIMATED. RCRA INFLUENT IS ESTIMATED. FIGURES HAVE BEEN
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.9 / 0.9
ROUNDED OFF.
THESE SYSTEMS ADJUST PH OF LABORATORY WASTEWATERS FROM REGENERATION OF ION EXCHANGE RESINS
SEC HE 05 07
IND006050967 ELI LILLY & CO.-TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES SHADELAND
Source Code : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : 6203-Organic Liquid
•Waste Description : SPENT SOLVENT FROM BULK PHARMACEUTICAL PROCESSING FOR SOLVENT RECOVERY.
Comnents : SEC. I, BOX F; A31, A32, A33 ALSO LISTED.
CAS Numbers :
73 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
114.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight .
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 2
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : M021-Solvents Recovery/105.4
Waste Codes : D001
IND006050967 ELI LILLY & CO.-TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES SHADELAND
92 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
35.585.0 2-No
Source Code •
Form Code
Waste Description
Conroents
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
8104-Inorganic Liquid
SPENT MIXED ACID FOR SULFUR1C ACID RECOVERY.
SEC. II, ON-SITE SYSTEM 1; RECOVERY OF SULFURIC ACID.
07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s) ,
M032-0ther Recovery/35,585.0
D002
PS Page System
1 H021-Solvents Recovery
Sec.lII-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
2,817.1 / 2,817.1
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
7,459.8 / 7,459.8
% Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type
Description
Convnent
0.1-Tank
FRACTIONATION/DISTILLATION UNIT FOR THE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS IN PHARMACEUTICAL/AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.
SEC. II, BOX B; SYSTEM RECEIVES MULT I-COMPONENT WASTE STREAMS AND OPERATIONAL CAPACITY IS DEPENDANT UPON THE MIXTURE OF
WASTE COMPONENTS. . SEC. II, BOX C; EFFLUENT FIGURES INCLUDE EFFLUENT FROM CLOSE
D-LOOP RECOVERY OPERATIONS IN ADDITION TO NON-CLOSED-LOOP RECOVERIES.
SEC. II, BOX E; TANK AVAILABILTY.
M041-Incineration
69,891.7 / 68,467.9
102,957.0 / 102,957.0 .
947,891.0 / 947,891.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 3
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
3
Facility
Name City
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
01 -Operational
03- Incinerator
INCINERATION OF LIQUIDS IN TWO THERMAL
M031 -Other Recovery 7.8 / 7.8
Sec.I!l-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
GM Origin 1991 Tons
Page SIC . Code Point of Measurement Generated
OXIDIZERS.
192.1 / 192.1 95.7 / 47.8 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
Radio-
active
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : POLYMER RECOVERY OPERATION.
Comment s
M043-Incineration 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0. / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1996
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status : OS-Planned, Not Constructed • ,
Unit Type : 03-Incinerator
Description : INCINERATION OF SOLIDS AND LIQUIDS IN ROTARY KILN AND SECONDARY COMBUSTION CHAMBER SYSTEM.
Conment : SEC. I, BOX C; SYSTEM IS PLANNED; NOT EXISTING IN 1991. SEC. Ill, BOX B; SYSTEM IS PLANNED; NOT FULLY DESIGNED.
M032-0ther Recovery 35,585.0/35,585.0 108,000.0/108,000.0 252,201.6/0.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
08-Exempt
01-Operational
01-Tank
SULFURIC ACID RECOVERY OPERATION.
REMOVAL OF CONTAMINANTS FROM SPENT SULFURIC ACID STREAM.
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 10,890,104.9 / 1,678,668.1 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
10,651,305.9 / 0.0
% Future Capacity
10,404.4 / 10,404.4
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
1900
-------
DATE : 11/15/94
File : 1ND6RUN1.RPT
Page 4
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-Operational
01-Tank
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR BIOTREATMENT OF AQUEOUS WASTE FROM PROCESSING AREAS.
SEC. II, BOX B; THE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IS NOT DEFINED IN FLOW CAPACITY TERMS.
H083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 552,106.7 / 552,106.7
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
554,026.2 / 554,026.2
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : OlrOperational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : AIR STRIPPING UNIT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PRIOR TO BIOTREATMENT.
Comment : SEC. II, BOX B; THE AIR STRIPPING UNIT IS NOT DEFINED IN FLOW CAPACITY TERMS.
Ml25-0ther Trtmt 5.2 / 5.2
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
5.2 / 5.2
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
% Future Capacity
9.2 / 9.2
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
C eminent
08-Exempt
03-Permanently Closed
02-Container
ADDITION OF CLAY ABSORBANT AND WATER TO FILTER CAKE.
SEC IB: TREATMENT IN DRUMS TO REDUCE BTU VALUE
KYD006370175 ISP CHEMCIALS INC.
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/City)
Waste Codes
A09-Cleaning & Degreasing
B113-Inorganic Liquid
CALVERT CITY
28 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
10,514.5 2-No
2-No TRI Constituent
M082-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/10,514.5
D018
-------
BRS 91 Overs igi. GM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 5
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility GM Origin
ID Name City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1 MOSI-Energy Recovery 2,609.3/2,609.3 5,000.0/5,000.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status 1 -RCRA
Operational Status 1 -Operational
Unit Type 1 -Tank 4 -Kiln, Furnace, or Boiler
Description
Comment
2 M121-0ther Trtmt 506.5 / 506.5 1,000.0 / 1,000.0 506.5 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 . 1900
Regulatory Status 2 -NPDES
Operational Status 1 -Operational
Unit Type 10-Tank
Description
Comment
3 M121-0ther Trtmt 11,131.5/11,131.5 20,000.0/20,000.0 11,131.5/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 . 1900
Regulatory Status 2 -NPDES
Operational Status 1 -Operational
Unit Type 10-Tank
Description
Comment • .
4 M082-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 10,514.5 / 10,514.5 20,000.0 / 20,000.0 10,514.5 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status 2 -NPDES
Operational Status 1 -Operational
Unit Type 1 -Tank 2 -Container
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
111.1 / 111.1
Description
Comment
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - GM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 6
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement Generated
Radio-
active
-
MED985468982 FMC CORP-MCD - BIOPRODUCTS
ROCKLAND
3 2836 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
1.2 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A94-Other Processes
B203-0rganic Liquid
WASTE ISOPROPANOL USED IN LABORATORIES
1-No TRI Report
M021-Solvents Recovery/1.2
0001
PS Page System
1 M021-Solvents Recovery
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Sec.lII-A.
1.2 / 1.2
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.3 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
. N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status 01-RCRA
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
01 -Operational
01 -Tank
WASTE ISOPROPANOL GENERATED
Comment
1900 .
IN THE LABORATORY IS DISTILLED FOR RE-USE
MID006013643 PARKE DAVIS & CO
HOLLAND
8 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
152.415.8 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments '
: A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: 8101-Inorganic Liquid
: AQUEOUS WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF PHARMACEUTICALS.
: SECTION I, BOX F - AQUEOUS CHEMICAL WASTES FROM THE PRODUCTION OF PHARMACEUTICALS. SECTION II - FILTRATION & DEEPWELL I
NJECTION.
CAS Numbers
: 00067-56-1 00067-64-1 . 00071-43-2 00075-05-8 00110-86-1
-------
BRS 91 Oversight J
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 7
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M125-0ther Trtmt/152,415.8
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page
10
11
12
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
System
M134-Disposal 152,415.8 / 152,415.8 339,733.1 / 339,733.1 152,415.8 / 152,415.8
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
521,768.1 / 521,768.1
1992
1
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
04-UIC
01-Operational
01-Tank 06-Underground Inj.'Well
DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF PRE-TREATED AQUEOUS CHEMICAL WASTE.
M125-0ther Trtmt 152,415.8 / 152,415.8 339,733.1 / 339,733.1 152,415.8 / 152,415.8
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
1,169.3 /. 0.0
521,768.1 / 521,768.1
1992
1
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
01-Operational
01-Tank
TREATMENT OF AQUEOUS CHEMICAL WASTES PRIOR TO DEEP WELL INSPECTION BY EQUALIZATION, NEUTRALIZATION, AND FILTRATION.
SECTION, I, BOX B - TREATMENT OF AN AQUEOUS WASTE STREAM BY EQUALIZATION, NEUTRALIZATION, AND FILTRATION.
M021-Solvents Recovery 498.2 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,724.5 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
365.8 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
07-RCRA/UIC
01-Operational
01-Tank
RECOVERY OF ACETONE.
M021-Solvents Recovery 255.4 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1.636.5 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
88.9 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight viH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 8
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
Facility Facility
ID Name
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
GM Origin
City Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated • active
13
14
15
16
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 07-RCRA/UIC
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RECOVERY OF ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL.
Conroent : SECTION III, BOX A - BOX WAS LEFT BLANK BUT THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THEREFORE DAC AT DPRA ENTERED "NO" IN
THIS BOX.
M021-Solvents Recovery 1,766.3 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
3,424.2 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
, 747.2 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
07-RCRA/UIC
01-Operational
01-Tank
RECOVERY OF METHYL ALCOHOL.
SECTION 11C: MLH AT DPRA ASSUMED RESPONSE. TO BE '1.00 SG' 10/01/92.
H021-Solvents Recovery 520.1 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,945.2 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
271.3 / 271.3
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 07-RCRA/UIC
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RECOVERY OF TOLUENE.
Conroent :
M021-Solvents Recovery 124.7 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,446.4 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
32.9 / 32.9
% Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
. Comment
07-RCRA/UIC
01-Operational
01-Tank
RECOVERY OF XYLENE.
M021-Solvents Recovery 3,795.4 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
3,561.1 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
569.3 / 569.3
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 9 .
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name City
N 0.0 /
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
0.0 1900
07-RCRA/UIC
01 -Operational
01 -Tank
SOLVENTS RECOVERED AS FUEL.
GM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
/
MND037335072 SANOFI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR INC
CHASKA
7 2835 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2.6 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/City)
Waste Codes
A94-Other Processes
B110-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE SOLUTIONS GENERATED THROUGH GENERAL LAB PROCEDURES.
SECTION 11C: UOM=5 BUT DENSITY LISTED AS DK=DONT' KNOW OR BLANK; THEREFORE, MLH AT DPRA ASSUMED RESPONSE TO BE '8.34 LB
S/GAL1 IN ORDER TO PASS DATA ASSESSMENT EDIT.
1-No TRI Report
M121-Other Trtmt/2.6
D002
PS Page System
9 M121 -Other Trtmt
Sec. I II -A. New Max. Open.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
3.1 / 0.0
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
3.1 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
03-POTW
01-Operational
02-Container
NEUTRALIZATION OF P030 CYANIDE SOLUTION WASTE.
SECTION IIB: NEUTRALIZATION IS PART OF THE PROCESS. NEUTRALIZATION CAPACITY WOULD NOT EXCEED PRODUCTION CAPACITY.
10
M121-0ther Trtmt 2.6 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
2.6 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
A & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 10
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
: 03-POTW
: 01-Operational
: 02-Container
: NEUTRALIZATION OF CORROSIVE SOLUTION WASTE D002.
: AWXRION IIA AND C: UOM=5 BUT DENSITY LISTED AS DK=DON'T KNOW; THEREFORE, MLH AT DPRA ASSUMED RESPOSNE TO BE '8.34 LBS/G
AL1 IN ORDER TO PASS DATA ASSESSMENT EDIT.
NCD042091975 MALLINCKROOT S.C.C. RALEIGH PLT.
RALEIGH
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste-Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B219-0rganic Liquid
PROCESS WASTEWATER EXHIBITING CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS
SEC I H: HIGH WATER CONTENT NITROBENZENE 3 10*PPM .
WHICH IS NORMALLY MIXED IN THE SEWER SYSTEMS.
00098-95-3 •
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/62,850.2
0036
17 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
WASTE (D036) FROM THE PRODUCTION OF P-AMINOPHENOL.
SEC IV B: W99 REVERSE OSMOSIS OF NON-REGULATED WASTE WATER
67,704.1 2-No
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
19
M051-Energy Recovery 584.0 / 584.0 4,263.4 / 2,653.1 0.0 / 0-0
Sec. III-A. New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail'. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
20
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 04-Kitn. Furnace, or Boiler
Description : THERMAL OXIDATION OF ANILINE STILL BOTTOM (K083) IN BOILER #1 FOR HEAT RECOVERY
Comment :
M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 87,610.9 / 62,850.2 318.275.3 / 318,275.3 19,277.5 / 0.0
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
Y 518,122.5 / 518,122.5
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW
1992
1
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
uM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 11
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-Operational
01-Tank
AEROBIC DIGESTION OF CONTAMINATED WASTEUATER EXHIBITING
1.7508 MGM ESTIMATED FOR SEPTEMBER 1991
THE CHARACTERISTIC OF NITROBENZENE (D036)
NED007274699 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM ANIMAL HLTH
LINCOLN
7 2833 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HU
25.7 . 2-No
Source Code .
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
: A99-Other Processes
: 8110-Inorganic Liquid
: CORROSIVE AQUEOUS SOLUTION FROM REGENERATION OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN BEDS IN EQUIPMENT PRODUCING DEION I ZED WATER.
: SECTION I, BOX F: ION EXCHANGE RESIN BEDS ARE REGENERATED. THE BEDS ARE TREATED WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID AND RINSED, WIT
H THE EFFLUENT RETAINED. NEXT, THE BED IS TREATED WITH A SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION, RINSED, AND THE EFFLUENTS COMBINED
AND PH NEUTRALIZED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO POTW. SECTION IIA, I IB AND I ID SITE 1: PER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION
BETWEEN DAN HOWE AND TIM BONTRAGER/DPRA, RESPONSES WERE CHANGED/AS THOSE NOTED ABOVE (MLH/DPRA) 03/09/93.
: 2-No TRI Constituent
: M121-0ther Trtmt/25.7
: D002
NED007274699 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM ANIMAL HLTH
LINCOLN
8 2833 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
25.7 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A99-Other Processes
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
ACIDIC AQUEOUS SOLUTION FROM REGENERATION OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN BEDS IN EQUIPMENT PRODUCING DEION I ZED WATER.
SECTION I, BOX F: ION EXCHANGE RESIN BEDS ARE REGENERATED. THE BEDS ARE TREATED WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID AND RINSED, WIT
H THE EFFLUENT RETAINED. NEXT, THE BED IS TREATED WITH A SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION, RINSED, AND THE EFFLUENTS COMBINED
AND PH NEUTRALIZED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO POTW. SECTION IIA, I IB AND I ID SITE 1: PER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION
BETWEEN DAN HOWE AND TIM BONTRAGER/DPRA, RESPONSES WERE CHANGED AS. THOSE NOTED ABOVE (MLH/DPRA) 03/09/93.
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/25.7
D002
-------
BRS 91 OversIgh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
JH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 12
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
PS Page
System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Open.
(Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
9 M!21-0ther Trtmt 1,712.7/51.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
20,486.5 / 614.6
Future Avail. Code
1,712.7 / 0.0
Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
03-POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank
WASTE TREATMENT IS ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION OF AQUEOUS HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTION AND AQUEOUS SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION
BY COMBINING THE SOLUTIONS IN A ...(CONTINUED IN COMMENTS).
SECTION II, BOX A: RCRA INFLUENT ESTIMATED ON 3% OF INFLUENT IS PH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 2, OR GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO
12. SECTION II, BOX B: IT IS VERY DOUBTFUL ANY MEANINGFUL HAZARDOUS WASTE CAPACITY DATA CAN BE DERIVED FROM THE MAXIM
UN NUMBER OF TIMES A 2,588 GAL. HOLDING TANK CAN BE FILLED, MIXED, AND EMPTIED IN A YEAR! NEVER THE LESS - AS INSTRUCTS
D: ESTIMATING 2,136 NEUTRALIZATION CYCLES ANNUALLY AT 2.300GALLONS EACH AT 8.34 0/GAL. WOULD YIELD 40,973,000 LBS. MAX
IMUM ANNUAL SYSTEM CAPACITY. SECTION I, BOX A CONT'D: 2,500 GALLON NEUTRALIZING TANK. TH
E PH IS NEUTRALIZED, VERIFIED ACCEPTABLE FOR DISCHARGE, THENDISCHARGED TO POTW.
PAD003043353 MERCK & CO., INC. CHEROKEE PLANT
RIVERSIDE
1 2833 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
384.6 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish ,
B204-0rganic Liquid
IGNITABLE LISTED SPENT SOLVENT FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING. CONTAINS CHLOROFORM, ETHANOL AND ACETIC ACID.
1F. PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING.
00067-66-3 .
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M021-Solvents Recovery/384.6
D001 0002 D022
PAD003043353 MERCK & CO., INC. CHEROKEE PLANT RIVERSIDE 4 2833 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
Source Code : A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : 8202-Organic Liquid
Waste Description : LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENT FROM PRODUCTION OPERATIONS. CONTAINS ETHYLENE DI CHLORIDE.
594.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh j
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 13
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
City
GM Origin
Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
: IF. PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING.
: 00107-06-2
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M021-Solvents Recovery/594.0
Waste Codes : 0028 0001
PS Page System
1 M081-Aqueous Organic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1,583,932.0 / 1,583,932.0 2,283,075.0 / 2,283.075.0 1.583.932.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
8,450.1 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES -
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank 03-Incinerator
Description : BIOLOGICAL WASTEUATER TREATMENT FACILITY CONSISTING OF;CAUSTIC HYDROLYSIS,SOLVENT STRIPPING,EQUALIZATION,NEUTRALIZATION,
PRIMARY CLARIFICATION,BIOFILTERS,AEROBIC DIGESTION-.SECONDARY
Conroent : CLARIFICATION, SLUDGE DEWATERING, AND SLUDGE INCINERATION. IA. NOT ALL WASTEUATER UNDERGOES CAUSTIC HYDROLYSIS AND SOLVE
NT STRIPPING; IT DOES ALL UNDERGO SUBSEQUENT TREATMENT AS LISTED. SECONDARY EFFLUENT IS CHLORINATED DURING THE SWIMMING
SEASON.
M021-Solvents Recovery 5,178.6 / 5,178.6 4,500.0 / 4,500.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M041-Incineration
02-NPDES
01-Operational
SOLVENT RECOVERY VIA DISTILLATION.
IIC. THE DISTILLATION COLUMN BOTTOMS GO TO THE ON-SITE HAZARDOUS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.
483.6 / 483.6
1.451.0 / 1,451.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 03-Incinerator
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight .
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 14
Description
Comment
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
INCINERATION OF D001 SPENT SOLVENT IN LIQUID INJECTION INCINERATOR.
1C. SYSTEM IS RCRA REGULATED AND PERMITTED TO BURN IGNITABLE ONLY HAZARDOUS WASTE.
PAD980550412 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CHEMICALS
UPPER MERION
2 2833 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
7,397.0 2-No
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B101-Inorganic Liquid •
IGNITABLE, CORROSIVE WASTE WATER FROM FINE CHEMICAL MFC MIXTURE OF WATER, SODIUM SULFATE, SODIUM CHLORIDE, AMMONIA, METH
ANOL, 1SOPROPYL ALCHOL, ACETONE
00067-56-1 00067-64-1 00108-88-3 07647-01-0 07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/3,227.7
D001 D002
PAD980550412 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CHEMICALS
UPPER MERION
9 2833 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
111.9 -2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Garments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A32-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B212-0rgan1c Liquid
CORROSIVE, REACTIVE WASTEWATER FROM FINE CHEMICAL MFG. MIXTURE INCLUDES ACETON1TRILE, PHOSPHOROUS EXYCHLORIDE AND TRIET
HYLMETHYL AMMONIUM CHLORIDE
2-No TRI Constituent
M094-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/17.2
D002 D003
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
PS Page System
T~ M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 3,227.7 / 3,227.7 16.477.7 / 16,477.7 3,529.0 / 408.1
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 15
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
OS-Exempt
01-Operational
01-Tank
STEAM STRIPPING OF AQUEOUS UASTS (D001, D002) IN A TANK
2 M021-Solvents Recovery 178.6 / 178.6 1.634.9 / 1,634.9 132.3 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
60.7 / 60.7
2,477.1 / 2,477.1
1992
1
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RECOVERY OF SPENT SOLVENT WASTES (D001, F003) IN A TANK • -
Comment :
M041-Incineration 8,215.1/7,894.4 19,716.0 /• 19,716.0 12.105.1/12,105.1 0.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA '
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 03-Incinerator
Description : INCINERATION OF SPENT SOLVENTS (F002, F003, F005, D001) AND AQUEOUS (D001, D002) WASTES IN ONE LIQUID INJECTION INCINERA
TOR -
Comment :
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 60,508.1/12,106.9 92,650.5/0.0 60,738.5/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
1,350.9 / 1,028.4
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : PHYSICAL CHEMICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM INVOLVING EQUALIZATION, PH ADJUSTMENT, CHEMICAL ADDITION, CHEM. PRECIPITATION, CLARIF
ICATION. NEUTRALIZATION AND FILTRATION. BIOTREAT EFFLUENT
Comment i
M094-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt
17.2 / 17.2
343.0 / 343.0
90.5 / 90.5
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
A & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 16
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Sec.lll-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEUTRALIZATION OF AN AQUEOUS WASTE (0002 D003) STREAM
Comment : SEC I B: WASTE STREAM IS NEUTRALIZED. PRIOR TO OFF-SITE TREATMENT
PRD000692525 ANAQUEST CAR IBE, INC.
GUAYAMA
7 2834 1-On-site activity 4-After mix of HW & non-HW
2,304.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
8110-Inorganic Liquid
INFLUENT WS WATERS TO THE WS WATER TERATMENT PLANT (RCRA EXEMPTED UNIT) MIXTURE OF SODIUM OF SALTS IN AN ALKALINE AQUEOU
SOL (NAOH)
2-No TRI Constituent
M078-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/2,304.0
0002
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
1 M078-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 6,976.9 / 2,304.0 10,106.0 / 10,106.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
6,784.6 / 0.0
83,712.8 / 83,712.8
1992
1
Residual (Total/RCRA)
192.3 / 192.3
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (RCRA EXEMTED) CONSISTING OF PHADJUSTMENT AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION FOLLOWED BY FILTER
PRESS.
Comment :
PRD090028101 MERCK SHARP & DOHME QUIMICA
BARCELONETA
15 2833 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
27,632.1 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUM1.RPT
JIH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 17
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B219-0rganic Liquid
AHONIA AND DMSO STREAM CONTAINING CYANIDE - RECOVERY
SEC. Ill, SYSTEM 1. ALKALINE HYDRUL1SIS WITH SOLVENT
01310-73-2 07664-41-7
8-Unknown
M094-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt/27,632.1
D002
AND DESTRUCTION.
RECOVERY.
PS Page System
1 MOA1-Incineration
Sec.III-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
581.2 / 581.2
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
2,191.0 / 2,191.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank 03-Incinerator
Description : INCINERATION OF SPENT HALOGENATED AND NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENT
Comment :
M044-Inclneration 181.8 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,155.0 / 1,155.0
Future Avail. Code
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M125-0ther Trtmt
06-RCRA/POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank • 03-Incinerator
INCINERATION OF WS CAS
SEC II BOX A & 8: WS GAS IS HAZ AT POINT OF GEN BECAUSE
THE INCINERATOR IT NO LONGER FITS THE DEFINTION.
ALSO BURNS LISTED SOLVENT.
20,176.1 / 20,176.1
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
IT IS COMPRESSED BUT WHEN THESE GASES BY PRODUCT REACHES
SEC II BOX C: EFFLUENT IS CLASSIFIED AS HAZ BECAUSE THE UNIT
720,944.4 / 29,877.4
989,332.0 / 939,332.0
720,944.4 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. NeM Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
-------
BRS 91 Oversight M ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 18
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
Facility Facility
ID Name
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
GH Origin
City Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : US-WATER PRETREATMENT SYSTEM
Comnent : SEC I, BOX B: AN EQUALIZATION AND PH ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM
POTW.
M049-Incineration 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
(INCLUDING A SOLVENT SKIMMER) WHICH DISSCHARGES TO A
0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
% Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1994
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
OS-Planned, Not Constructed
01-Tank 03-Incinerator
PLANNED ROTARY KILN INCINERATORS
M029-Solvents Recovery 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
1996
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
1
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comnent
01-RCRA
OS-Planned, Not Constructed
01-Tank
PLANNED SOLVENT RECOVERY SYSTEM
M132-Disposal 0.0 / 0.0 .
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
06-Other
07-Landfill
HAZ WS SECURE LANDFILL CLOSURE
M023-Solvents Recovery 510.4 / 510.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Totat/RCRA) Year of Change
1,020.0 / 1,020.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
% Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
510.4 / 510.4
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/15/94 Page 20
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
City
GM
Page
Origin
SIC Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper.
Uotal/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
1 M078-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Sec.lII-A.
1,548.0 / 1,548.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
10,000.0 / 10,000.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
1,548.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW .
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank 07-Landfill
Description : A CORROSIVE LIQ WS FROM CHEMICAL SYNTESIS THAT CONTAINS PHOSPHORIC ACID AND HYDROCHLORIC ACID IS CONCENTRATED BY EVA
PORATING WATER AND THEN NEUTRALIZED WITH RAW CALCIUM CARBONA
Comment ' :
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
35 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2,355.5 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent .
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A09-Cleaning & Degreasing
B105-Inorganic Liquid
IFNI TABLE CORROSIVE REACTOR WASHWATER
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/2,355.5
D001 D002
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT ORANGEBURG
Source Code : A31-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : B105-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : CORROSIVE PROCESS WASHWATER
Comments :
CAS Numbers : 07647-01-0
36 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
5,396.9 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 21
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
1 City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
TRI Constituent : 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : N121-0ther Trtmt/5,396.9
Waste Codes : D002 0018
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
37 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
8,567.7 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B105-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE IGNI TABLE ACID WATER
00067-56-1 07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtmt/8,567.7
D001 0002
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
51 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
677.7 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE AQUEOUS CONDENSATE
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/677.7
D002 .
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT ORANGEBURG
Source Code : A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
52 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
664.3 2-No
-------
BRS 91 OversIgh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 22
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
B105-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE ACIDIC SOLUTION
SEC II 0 THIS MATERIAL IS SOLD AS A BYPRODUCT
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtmt/112.0
D002
MATERIAL DISPOSED REPRESENTS EXCESS PRODUCTION
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B105-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE STRIPPER CONDENSATE
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/6,041.9
D002
53 2834. 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
WASTE ID AW 0001A
6,041.9 2-No
SCD0433B4072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
54 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2,625.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B105-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE ACIDIC SOLUTION
07647-01rO
3-TRI Constituent(s)
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 23
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : H121-Other Trtmt/2,625.0
Waste Codes : 0002 0018
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
55 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
8,573.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid •
CORROSIVE HYDROLYSIS WATER
00067-56-1 07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/8,573.0
D002
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
56 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2,171.8 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A33-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B119-Inorganic Liquid
IGNITABLE VACUUM JET CONDENSATE
SEC I H BIOS ACIDIC AQUEOUS WASTE WITH PPM CYANIDE
DESTRUCTION
00074-90-8
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/2,171.8
D001
SEC II ON SITE SYSTEM 1 LIME NEUTRALIZATION AND CYANIDE
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT ORANGEBURG
Source Code : A31-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : 8101-Inorganic Liquid
57 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
118.4 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversigl
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
JM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 24
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
IGNITABLE WASHWATER
07664-41-7
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtmt/118.4
D001
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
58 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
122.5 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A31-0ther than Surface Prep and Finish
8101-Inorganic Liquid
IGNITBALE WASH WATER
2-No TRI Constituent
H121-0ther Trtmt/122.5
D001
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
59 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
37.6 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Cements
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
A32-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
B119-Inorganic Liquid
IGNITABLE WASH WATER
SEC IH B119 AQUEOUS WASTET WITH LOW OTHER ORGANICS
2-No TRI Constituent
M121-Other Trtmt/37.6
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
& PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 25
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Waste Codes
D001
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
60 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
367.4 2-Ho
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A31-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE WASH WATER
07664-38-2
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtmt/367.4
D002
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT
ORANGEBURG
61 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
7,881.4 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A35-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
CORROSIVE ACIDIC SOLUTION
SECII THIS MATERIAL IS SOLD AS A BYPRODUCT
07647-01-0
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-Other Trtmt/1,279.1
0002
MATERIAL DISPOSAL REPRESENTS EXCESS PRODUCTION
SCD043384072 ETHYL CORPORATION-ORANGEBURG PLANT ORANGEBURG
Source Code . : A37-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : 8105-Inorganic Liquid.
Waste Description : CORROSIVE ACIDIC SOLUTION
62 2834 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
538.9 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversigh
DATE : 11/15/94
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
uM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 26
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Comments • :
CAS Numbers , : 07664-38-2
TR1 Constituent .: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : Ml21-0ther Trtmt/538.9
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page
3
34
47
System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M051-Energy Recovery 2,925.5/2,401.8 5,000.0/4,250.0 150.7/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M121-Other Trtmt
04-Kiln, Furnace, or Boiler
11-RCRA
01-Operational
01-Tank
WASTE FUELS STEAM BOILER
SECTION I BOX C REGULATORY STATUS 11 A CERTIFICATION OF PRECOMPLIANCE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED RO EPA REGION IV FOR OPERATION
OF THE BOILER ON RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE- FUELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EPA 40CFR PART 266 SUBPART H ETHYL INTENDS TO SUBMIT A C.
ERTIF1CATION OF COMPLIANCE BY AUGUST 21 1992 AND TO PURSUE INTERIM STATUS AND A RCRA B PERMIT FOR THE BOILER SECTION I
BOX E UNIT TYPE 01 WASTE FUEL IS SUPPLIED TO THE BOILER FROM 3 90 DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS AND VIA TRAILER
SECTION II BOX B MAX OP CAP QUALTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FROM PAST EXPERIENCE
1,268.222.1 / 50,706.2
1,826,460.0 / 73,025.8
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.m-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
M121-Other Trtmt
08-Exempt
01-Operational
01-Tank
PHADJUSTMENT WELL AT THE INLET TO THE WASTE
4,371.7 / 3,122.6
TREATMENT SYSTEM
18,200.0 / 13,000.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE 8 11/15/94 Page 27
File : IND6RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility GM Origin
Name City Page SIC Code
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
Unit Type : 01 -Tank
Description : INLINE HIKING SYSTEM AT DISCHARGAE OF T 15H 46 AND T 15M 55
Comment :
50
63
66
M121-0ther Trtmt 53,876.7 / 22,665.3
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
89,250.0 / 37,546.4 47,379.7 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
08-Exempt
01-Operational
01-Tank
LIME NEUTRALIZATION TANKS T 434 AND T438
M121-0ther Trtmt 13,513.8 / 1,125.2
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
90,780.0 / 7,558.8 11,480.5 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code % Future Capacity
N 0.0 /
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
0.0
08-Exempt
01 -Operational
01 -Tank
T 20M 10 LIME NEUTRA
1900
M121-0ther Trtmt 15,000.0 / 167.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
- 17,000.0 / 189.0
Future Avail. Code
15,000.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : 330 ACID NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM
Conroent : THIS PAGE SUBMITTED4/13/92, AFTER THE REST OF THE FACILITY'S FORMS.
0.0 / 0.0
2,033.3 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
VAD093012417 MILES INC.
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
MIDDLETOUN 12
: A02-Cleaning & Degreesing
: 8114-Inorganic Liquid
: CORROSIVE LIQUIDS PRODUCTION TAILS AND WASHING SOLUTIONS
2835 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
5.9 2-No
-------
BRS'91 Overs ig.
DATE : 11/15/94
File t IND6RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 28
BRS Data for "Pharmaceutical" Industry
Top 25 Faculties Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent : 1-No TRI Report
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : H121-Other Trtmt/5.9
Waste Codes : 0002
: F. ALSO A04, 109/SEC I! A. NEUTRALIZATION OF CORROSIVE
WASTES WAS INITIATED IN 1991.
System
M121-Other Trtmt
Sec.III-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
163.3 / 6.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
163.3 / 6.0
Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1992
1
Regulatory Status : 08-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational ••
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEUTRALIZATION OF DOOZ CORROSIVE LIQUIDS IN TANKS
Comment :
-------
ATTACHMENT 15-2
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR FOLLOW-UP TO BRS DATA
-------
15-2-1
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Eli Lilly & Co. Tippecanoe Laboratories, Lafayette, IN
DATE: 12/5/94
CONTACT NAME: . Ken McCleary
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (317)477-4180
ICF CONTACT NAME: Manisha Shahane
Waste Generation and Management
• This facility generates D001 and D002 wastes.
• The processes generating these waste streams are:
- Chemical synthesis
- Biological processes (e.g., in formation of antibiotics)
This facility produces close to 100 intermediate and final bulk products^
• UTS (Universal Treatment Standards) level of detail for the wastewaters is
unavailable.
• How the waste streams are managed after generation:
- This facility has multiple wastewater treatment systems sending the
wastewaters to a single outfall under NPDES.
- Most of the wastewaters requiring treatment are D001 and D002 wastes.
- Type of waste generation varies from year to year depending on the
products.
- This facility has above-ground tanks with no land-based units.
- This facility also does physical treatment, chemical treatment, biological
treatment, and incineration.
• The biological tank treatment system is provided as part of the permit
Additional/Alternative Treatment
• The facility would re-pipe the system if the wastes have to be segregated.
• This project would take approximately 3 years and 50 million dollars
• There are alternative treatment processes on site
Waste Discharge Agreement
• This facility discharges into the Wabash river through a NPDES permit.
-------
15-2-2
• The facility uses BOD and COD as surrogates.
Permits called for the use of biomonitoring (was conducted for certain
period of time) and also initial screening of the wastes. Ongoing
monitoring is required for 20 or so constituents on a daily, weekly, and
monthly basis. The results are reported to the state on a monthly basis.
Biomonitoring includes review of toxic effects of effluents on minnows and
small fish. The monitoring schedule may be revisited during the permit
renewal of the 5 year permit issued by the state.
• A listing of the 20 constituents and their concentrations in the facility's permit are
given in the attached materials sent by the contact
Special Wastes
• The contact is not sure if there are any special wastes.
Additional Information
• The contact stated that today's proposed rule and Phase IV (LDR) monitoring
requirements are already covered under existing programs such as the NPDES.
While proposing today's rule and the Phase IV rule, EPA should account for
established requirements for wastewater emissions in order to reduce and/or
eliminate redundancy. .
-------
12/07/94 11:07 »1 317 4774180 UlLLt
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
Lilly
Page JL. erf Jj? Pages
Date fZ/-7/nA-
FROM
TELEPHONE NUMBER
FAX PHONE NUMBER
TO
COMPANY
FAX PHONE NUMBER
C=>
r f IP
COMMENTS
Tlppecanoe Laboratories
Ell Lilly end Company
-------
12x07/94 11:08
317 4774186
LILLY T133-2
Page 2 of 22
Permit So* IK 0002861
TREATMENT FACILITY CLASSIFICATION
The discharger hat a Class D industrial vagtevater treatment plane*
classified in Accordance vlch 32C IAC 3-10.1, Classification of Water and
Hastevzter -ffreatnent Plants.
PART I
A. m-LLLNT LIHTTATIONS AND KONITORIKG REQUIREMENTS
1. During the period beginning on the affective date of this
permit and lasting until the expiration date, the permittee is
authorized to discharge frott outfaU(s) 001. Suck discharge
•hall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified
belov:
Discharge Limitations
Ibs/day
Effluent Daily Daily
Characteristic Average
Flow CMCD)
TBOD,
tm
7.730
COS 38.962
TSS
Aaaonia (as N)
Cyanide, Total
Temperature
TifrlinlTl inn " 1 lT
Chronic Toxicity**
Acute Toxicity**
Methylene Chloride*
Te trachloroe thy lene *
1,2-Dichloroethane*
Toluene*
Benzene*
8,361
2,000
—
..
~
--
—
--
—
—
Maximum
15,460
.77,924
16,722
4,167
—
__
3fi i •
—
—
—
—
• ~
—
mg/1
Daily
Average
MONITOR
«-
—
..
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR
MONITOR.
MONITOR
Daily
Maximum
ONLY
. —
—
— •
ONLY
0.1
ONLY
MWrv '
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
Monitoring
Measurement
Frequency
Continuous
3x Weekly
Daily
Daily
Weekly
Weekly
Daily
»» — 1.»—
Quarterly
Continuous
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Requirement
Sample
Tjrpe
24-hr
. Tota
24-hr. Comp
24-hr
24-hr
24-hr
24-hr
Grab
^Tft'l^^WV'
- . t
« Comp
« Comp
. C'
. Cc A
r C««p
i Coap
Static Eene<
Flow
Crab
Grab
Grab
Crab
t/rab
Grab
throug
».
-------
12/-07X94 11:09 Wl 317 4774100
LILLY
mi <»«/•*'
BEFORE COPYING FORM. ATTACH SITE IDENTIFICATION LABEL
EU LILLY & CO., TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES
^M^Hg^^^BpoMM^M^B^^Bw^Mw^^wMv^^B^^nv^^n
LILLY ROAD, SHADELAND, IN 47905
EPA1DNO. lllNlDlolo]6lO:Sio|gl6l7!
FORM
GM
UJ.EHVWOHMCHTAt.
PROTECTION AOCMCV
i9«i Huurioui WMM AtpM
WASTE GENERATION AND
MANAGEMENT
INSTRUCTIONS: RMdth»*taWinrtucfi«ii beginning on p«0« laoftiw 1091
SEC.
i
AQUEOUS EFFLUENT FROM THE WWTP AIR-STRIPPING UNIT TO BIOTREATMENT
B. EPA hurt wuteeod*
IP 10 10 12 lip lo !B IB
Ot> IB li liiTlft la b If lD I !«
1 I I I I 1111111
'iolclolylsU lo'loU ^Moh lalalol. la lo I- I? I' I I I I I I I I IN IA I
SEC.
i
MUM
( I |»|l|4io|i|tUiJ
auoN
•JLLJlsl*
JU I <
|M|Q Is li II I I
I I iNlAl I I I I I M I I I.U
SEC. ***•**•*•!»•>**•*+'
| |
Sit*
1
i i i i i i i * i i i
Ste
2
a PA e h* *
-------
12x07x94
31V
BEFORE COPYING FORM. ATTACK SITE IDENTIFICATION LABEL
Cfi ENTER
SITE NAME
EU ULLY & CO.. TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES
LILLY ROAD, SHADELAND, IN 47805
EPADNO. ! »!MlPlolDl6lOiSlOiS'6l7l
UXtHVUtOMMBcm
FORM
GM
1S81 HuMfouiWUtaRipor
WASTE QEMERATION AM
HAHMSBHfHT
! INSTRUCTIONS: Pitd*edw»Wlr*nnfitmibeBinnlnQonp«8»iaoTlh«lS9l HiartowYtateHtportbooHrtbetortcoT
SCRUBBER WATER FROM INCINERATION OF LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINING
SMALL AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT
Mn in I? I* I In la I? I
ftgttl
TOT-™-. ,
top II
1 i I I I I - i I i I I .«I I I I I M I i I I
•1 I I I I II I I I l«i I I I I 1 I M i M -I I J I I I I I
SEC,
«
"I*11
O.OMI«ll»*«ir«l»*ta*i»«*
wMr*M«n*l«,***MMMt,fwi«
«nil».«r«Mh*i»to«MM*(nWT
i I M 1 I |D|KU_h I I |fl|4l7|e|9|i|IoJrAJL_U.LNlAig[
I^BM^ta^^MtMH* - lMBM«M^ri^^^v ^^^^~^H^H
| ^'*V | |tn [ZJl* "•1"^
otunnviTuit
iMlo 1c It jl II loUJTlaloh I. LnJ
vw*p—>v* OuMVMM«^M^«rmycMMi»iki1«tl
I I IN JAl i I I I I I I I I I.LJ
SEC.
i m(WFTO«c.w)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 11
Site
£
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I l i i j
i i i i i i i i i
sea
w
LLLJ LLLJ
1 I I I_L_1_LJ
«H.
M i ! I M I U
.J LLJ.u
i I I I M I I.
-------
12x07x94 11:10
317 4774180
LILLY
BEFORE COPYING FORM, ATTACH 8ITE IDENTIFICATION LABEL
ELI LILLY & CO., TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES
^Baa.nv_^_M^^^_^_^B«>^>M^_B^>ma^«««^~^^^a
LILLY ROAD, SHADELAND, IN 47905
BPAID NO. I | IN ID lOlO I SloiS !OJ9l6l7
GM
WASTE QEKCHAT10H AND
MANAGEMENT
INSTRUCTIONS: R§»d tha dttaiM tortruetoni thinning en p*gt 13 of tt» 1M1 Huanfeia Wut* Rtport booMit twfof* oompfetfog thl» farm.
SEC.
I
AQUEOUS WASTE W/LOW AMTS OF SOLVENTS FROM PHARMACEUTICAL/AGRICULTURAL
Fi|ia PHOCESSINQ
B.EPAhAurawMttood* . . . ,_ .. , , . =
ftgiU IF 10 10 la I Ic In 'ft ml
n U li IP In
I !M i
C.VMMMNI1MMM*
1 I 1 I I I ! I I ' I 1 I I
D.ftiet EMgkin* |
9 In U U 11 MMM» I I 1 N I A I
N IT I
IB li In h I
117
Ld
ftfitt
le|4|. It | ' la la la IT Is. In IB i. !• I
lolTlsl. iolo I. laN'loh lalalol. \z lo U I? 1» lolo h lo [7 |. lo le I-J2J
SEC.
i
J I I I I I |0|K|.|
!M!O la |a 11 I I U Ic lo 11 lo lo :, UJ
O.UOM
| |l»t» | la ! 'I! a u. ^«ir»TM^n« i^
II JNJAl I II Ml I I I I.U
gen AWMMTMMlMMtMWNtfMitoiniT 1. V«(CQMTWUETOIQXt)
*>KW" '—*—•--^—" '•—^
stt»
1
1 I I I
i ! I ' t I
8tt»
2
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I
O.OUM
D.OMK
»
I
I .LI J i i i r i i.i i
SEC.
IV
1.V« (COMMIE TO KXI)
M I II i I 1
i I I I i I I I
NHtl
LJLtt!
i i I i I I • i I • I I.U
LJJ.U
I I I I I M Ll_
ComrNintK
SEC 1. BOX F.-A04, 09, A31, A32, A33, A34, A57, ASS, A59, A92
Pig.
-------
15-2-3
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Mallinckrodt S.C.C. Raleigh PUT. Raleigh, NC
DATE: 12/6/94
CONTACT NAME: Mark Jaeger, Vicky Will Environmental Manager
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 878-2815 ext 2822 FAX (919) 878-2823
ICF CONTACT NAME. Manisha Shahane
. The wastewaters generated at the facility is primarily acetic acid and water. The
pH of the wastewater is around 5.
These wastewaters do not exhibit any of the RCRA characteristics.
-------
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
15-2-4
TELEPHONE LOG
Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Inc in Chaska, MN
12/6/94
Tony Gregorich
1-800-666-7111 ext. 5440 Fax 612-368-1270
Manisha Shahane
This facility designs in vitro diagnostic equipment. The information in which EPA is interested in
was faxed to him on 12/8/94. Mr. Gregorich said that he would call back after he had a chance to
discuss the questions with his supervisor. No further contact has been made with the company.
Waste Generation and Management
• If the facility is a generator, it is a small generator of wastes.
• Any and all hazardous treatment is shipped elsewhere for treatment.
-------
Facilities Identified Conducting Treatment Steps
Likely to Occur in a Land-based Unit
-------
May 16.1994
Pharmaceutical Detailed Questionnaire Information on
Aerated Stabtflzatlon Basins and Wastewaler StabMzaf Ion Ponds
Aerated SlablHzatton Basins
Faclty
Open/
Enclosed
Surface
Af*a(R2)
UquW
Depth (II)
Volume of
Aeration
Zone (MO)
Hydraute
Retention
Time (Days)
Type of
Aeration
Surface/Submerged
Horsepower
for
Aeration (HP)
Submerged
Air Flow
(SCFM)
30031
30278
30278
30278
30299
30349
30360
30631
30631
30664
30664
30701
30701
30851
30903
30954
30954
• 31066*
•
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
o|Mn
open
open
open
open
-
21,700
19,437
15,070
336
2.052
79
13,708
13,708
26,450
26.450
35.200
26.000
2,335
8.800
3.600
3,600
5,000
4.0
13.6
5.7
6.5
12.0
10.0
80
17.0
1 17.0
9.8
9.8
4.0
4.0
14.0
10.0
9.0
9.0
5.5
5.0
1.46
0.715
0.57
6.03
0.15
0.004
1.75
1.75
1.25
1.25
1.05
0.64
0.228
0.75
. 0.242
0.242
0.145
29.0
1.2
0.6
0.5
1.0
0.02
12.0
50
5.0
15.0
15.0
0.47
0.38
0.8
25
1.8
1.8
0.45
Submerged
Surface
Surface
Surface
Submerged
Submerged
Submerged
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
'Surface
Surface
Submerged
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
Wastewaler Stabfballon Ponds
I
FecHy
30029
30227
30600
30600
30600
30600
30631
30664
31056
Open/
Enclosed
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
open
Surface
Area(fl2)
51,000
9,000
1,742,000
1,525,000
218,000
300.000
95,832
10.319
576
UquU
Depth (fl)
14.0
2.5
5.0
4.0
2.5
4.0
7.0
80
11.0
Volume
(MO)
5
0.25
60
45
5
7.5
5
0.75
0.028
Residence
Time (Days)
2.0
2.5
182.5
30.0
1.0
5.0
14.6
50
02
0.5
145
50
50
20
25
3
20
10
65
10
60
45
75
200
100
100
60
525
20
1600
-------
12x07^94 11:08
317 4774160
LILLY l
J BEFORE COPYING FORM, ATTACH 8ITE IDENTIFICATION LABEL
S^. AM PMWM
«rre NAME
EUULLY&CO, TIPPECANOE LABORATORIES
LILLY ROAD, SHADELAND, IN 47005
EPAJDNO. I ilMin1olole!olslol9lei7l
U.S. CHVUtONWf HTAl
FOMI
GM
WASTE GENERATION/
UAMACFUTNT
INSTRUCTIONS: Rwd tm do«td*m«*oM beghnJr* en paa* 13 of «u 1W1 H««rioi»Wu» Ripen togWft Wort wmphUnj ttib tam.
Sg^ {xwMtMt*. AQUEOUS WASTE FROM UNDERGROUND WATER RECOVERY WELLS CONTAINING SM
"*MI AMOUNTS OF SOLVENTS
10 It) 12 U U in U
In li In 111
l» II I UJ.
FWtt
1 1 1
I. U \* \
»ri!j
I I'M I A i
U l« lo
LU
U 1
HfiU
•la lo loli IT .
>h lole |. IB le |.J»J Mo U In U IT I. Is le I. h
Ld< lololalTlsl- lolel- Ul« Iclo !o U IT I- le le I-
8EC.
IKI.U
J_L U I I lN|A|.U
aueu
all I I.|N|A
Nfill ------
i^ __J 1
eti*f*,+u*rt
IMJC U la U 1 i Iglilolol
notti
I iNlAl I I || I Ml I I.U
SEC.
| |
Gto
1
MiM*a«J*Mli
I I 1 i i i i I i i i I
I 1 I I I I I I I I I
1 1
I t I I I
0.0Mb WlWi%«
"LJ
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SEC.
IV
AOHWir
X tM(TMMMI»OOI*UT()
I_U
.-*
I I I
DQ=I
C.O«%i^lh<>HI01*)ifc (»••»<•«
I I II II 11 I I.U
I I I.U
Mm U*m mtuHn
ConanMntK
SEC 2. A AND B • GROUND WATER. NOT A HAZARDOUS WASTE, GENERATED ON SITE
Pia«
-------
ATTACHMENT 15-3
DETAILED RESULTS OF TODAY'S PROPOSED RULE
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-------
ATTACHMENT 15-4
DATA FROM THE COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED PHASE III LDR RULE
-------
Pharmaceutical Industry
Commenter(s)
Comment Number(s)
Type Of Data
Issue Supported By Data
Merck Manufacturing Division
77
Waste stream
constituents
Wastewater
management
Merck states that the majority of hazardous wastes
generated from pharmaceutical manufacturing are
spent solvents generated by the solvent transfer and
extraction steps. These routinely generated spent
solvents often have similar properties, similar UHCs,
and exhibit identical characteristics, making them
amenable to aggregation. This is also true of water
streams generated from these processes. Just as there
are multiple solvent streams generated, there are
many more water streams, some of them hazardous.
These water steams are in contact with raw materials,
solvents, and the product. A simple example of this
is deionized (DI) water systems and demineralization
systems. DI water is used extensively in the
pharmaceutical industry and demineralization systems
are used in steam generation. Minerals/ions are
removed from water using ion exchange resin beds.
The regeneration columns must be regenerated
periodically by flushing with acid and caustic solutions
which may be hazardous. When these streams are
combined, the combined stream no longer exhibits a
characteristic. Therefore, Merck believes that it is
more appropriate to be able to aggregate these water
streams and evaluate them for characteristics and
LDR at the point that the aggregated stream leaves
the process.
-------
CHAPTER 16
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR THE
PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY
EPA agrees with commenters that regulation of the Phase HI wastes generated by the
pulp and paper industry should be deferred to the Pulp and Paper Cluster Rule. Therefore, EPA
is not applying today's rule to the pulp and paper industry at this time.
-------
CHAPTER 17
REQUIRED TREATMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR THE
TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING INDUSTRY
17.1 INTRODUCTION
This analysis of required treatment capacity for the transportation equipment cleaning
(TEC) industry was developed to support today's rule. The following sections are presented:
summary of findings, (Section 17.2); background on the TEC industry (Section 17.3); waste types
potentially subject to this rule (Section 17.4); available data on wastes generated and managed at
TEC facilities (Section 17.5); and a required treatment capacity analysis (Section 17.6).
17.2 SUMMARY
The transportation equipment cleaning (TEC) industry is primarily a service industry
consisting of companies that clean the interiors of material transport vehicles (i.e., tank trucks, rail
tanks, and barges) for the transportation industry. The category also includes some aircraft
industry operations, such as aircraft exterior washing, deicing and anti-icing, and pavement deicing
and anti-icing. A summary of the estimated impact of today's rule is shown in Exhibit 17-1.
EXHIBIT 17-1
MAJOR FINDINGS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING INDUSTRY
Discharge
Mode
Direct
Indirect
Zero
Total
Number of
Facilities8
722
105
74
707b
Total Wastewaters
Mixed with ICRT
Wastes (million
tons/yr)a
5.5
0.8
0.6
6.9
Facilities
Without
RCRA-
equivalent
Treatment8
566
85
56
707
Facilities
with Land-
based
Units"
61 to 170
9 to 26
6 to 17
76 to 213
Affected
Facilities8
61 to 170
9 to 26
6 to 17
76 to 213
Affected
Wastewater
(million
tons/yr)a
0.48 to 1.3
0.07 to 0.2
0.05 to 0.1
0.6 to 1.6
a The data in this column were determined on an aggregated basis and are apportioned to the direct, indirect, and
zero dischargers based on the percentage of each discharge mode.
b Some facilities have more than one type of cleaning operation and/or discharge mode; therefore, this total is less
than the sum of the above numbers.
-------
17-2
EPA does not expect the barge cleaning industry to be affected because cleaning is
primarily conducted on the water rather than in land-based units. Based on industry contacts, the
Agency also does not expect the aircraft exterior cleaning and anti-icing/de-icing industries to be
affected because their wastewaters do not appear to exhibit the characteristics of ICRT wastes.
EPA believes that most wastewaters from truck and rail car cleaning facilities include ICRT
wastes that contain constituents above the universal treatment standards. EPA estimates that
approximately 507 tank truck and rail tank cleaning facilities and 200 barges generate 6.9 million
tons of wastewaters per year. Furthermore, based on the Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey
and the PCS data, EPA estimates that approximately 11 to 42 percent of the facilities use land-
based units. Based on these factors, the Agency estimates that approximately 76 to 213 facilities
are likely to be impacted. These facilities represent approximately 0.6 million tons to 1.6 million
tons of wastewaters generated per year. The number of affected facilities may increase if
collection sumps are considered land-based units because most TEC facilities use collection
sumps.
173 BACKGROUND
The TEC category is primarily a service industry consisting of companies that clean the
interiors of material transport vehicles (i.e., tank trucks, rail tanks, and barges) for the
transportation industry. The category also includes some aircraft industry operations, such as
aircraft exterior washing, deicing and anti-icing, and pavement deicing and anti-icing (see the
appendices to the required capacity analyses for the electroplating/metal finishing and metal
products/machinery industries for other aircraft-related processes that generate ICRT wastes).
General background discussions on the TEC industry are provided below.
173.1 Truck, Rail, and Barge Tank Cleaning
There are thousands of different products that are transported by tank vehicles. The
facilities that conduct TEC operations do not necessarily share a single SIC code. This is
primarily because many TEC operations use the SIC code of the primary industry they support.
TEC facilities that clean truck, rail, and barge tanks may identify themselves in the SIC categories
of:
Transportation Equipment (3731, 3732, 3743, 3795, 3799);
• Railroad Transportation (SIC codes 4011 and 4013);
Trucking and Warehousing (SIC codes 4212, 4213, 4214, 4215, 4221, 4222, 4225,
4226, and 4231); or
Water Transportation (SIC codes 4412, 4424, 4432, 4449, 4481, 4482, 4489, 4492,
4493, and 4499).
-------
17-3
This analysis focuses primarily on the use of vehicles using "tanks" to transport materials.
'Tanks" are defined as any container where the container comes in direct contact with the
material being transported. Examples of these transportation vehicles-include:
• Tanker trucks;
• Rail tank cars;
• Barges;
• Intermodal tank containers (e.g., flatbed trucks);
• Intermediate bulk containers (e.g., tote bins);
• Closed-top hopper cars (for dry bulk materials); and
• Any other container that meets this program definition of a tank.
The industry has been broken down into five business operational groups:
• Tank cleaners - independent businesses that provide tank cleaning services;
• Carriers - business that provide the vehicle fleet and cleaning services;
• Shippers - businesses that own and clean their own fleet;
• Builder/leaser - businesses that lease and clean vehicles; and
• Combinations of the above.
In 1989, EPA identified 400 "for-hire" tank truck cleaning facilities, which are thought to
represent at least 80 percent of tank truck cleaners. -" In addition, approximately 90 rail tank car
cleaning facilities, and approximately 200 tank barge cleaning facilities were also identified. In 1994,
approximately 300 tank truck cleaning facilities advertised in the Modem Bulk Transporter.2 Only 35 rail
tank car cleaners advertised in one of the industry's major buyer's guides, The Pocket List of Railroad
Officials.3
These facilities exist nationwide, although they tend to be concentrated in major petrochemical or
industrial or manufacturing regions. Most facilities are located in the following states or regions: (1)
California; (2) Texas-Louisiana Gulf Coast; (3) Mississippi, Missouri, and Ohio Rivers; (4) Southern Lake
Michigan, Lake Erie, and Lake Huron; and (5) Eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Only a few
facilities are located in New England.
TEC facilities are open between 8 and 24 hours a day. Truck tank cleaners service approximately
10 to 40 tanks per day. An average rail tank car cleaner services approximately four to ten tanks per day.
The three major reasons for cleaning truck, rail, and barge tanks are to: (1) prevent
contamination of materials from one cargo to the next; (2) allow or facilitate inspections; and (3) allow
vehicle or vessel repair. First, tanks that are not in dedicated service (i.e., tanks that carry a variety of
1 This information has been obtained from U.S EPA, 1989, Preliminary Data Summary for the
Transportation Equipment Cleaning Industry, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, EPA-440/1-89-104.
It is important to note that processes and data may have changed since the writing of the document.
2 1994 (March), Modem Bulk Transporter. Vol. 56. No. 9.
3 1994 (November), The Pocket List of Railroad Officials. Vol. 100. No. 4. Serial No. 394.
-------
17-4
different products) must be cleaned frequently to prevent contamination of new cargos with residues from
previous loads. Even tanks in dedicated service may need cleaning frequently in order to prevent
contamination. Second, facilitating inspection of Gttings and valves is an important part of a routine
maintenance program. Third, tank cleaning provides a safe environment for repairs. The tank must be
free of any flammable and explosive liquids and gasses before welding or cutting repairs can be
performed.
Although some variations exist, the procedures for truck, rail, and barge tank cleaning are similar
at most facilities and include the following steps:
• check shipping papers to determine the cargo last carried;
• determine what the next cargo will be if possible;
• drain tank heel (residue) and, if need be, segregate it for off-site disposal;
• rinse the tank;
• wash the tank;
• rinse the tank; and
• dry the tank.
Two additional steps are performed as needed. These steps are to (1) check the volume
of residual cargo (heel) in the tank and (2) determine how to dispose of it. Water soluble heels
that are compatible with the facility's treatment system and the conditions of its wastewater
discharge permit are usually combined with other wastewaters for treatment and disposal.
Incompatible heels are segregated in drums or tanks for off-site disposal. Heels comprised of
soaps, detergents, solvents, acids, or alkalis can be salvaged for use as a cleaning fluid for tanks or
as a neutralizer for heels.
Cleaning steps vary among individual facilities. Certain cargos may need only a water
rinse, while others may require washing with detergent or with strong caustic solution followed.by
rinsing. A typical facility might offer hot and cold water rinses, detergent washing, and caustic
washing. Other possibilities include solvent washing, steam cleaning, and forced air drying.
173.2 Aircraft Exterior Cleaning and De-icing/Anti-icing
Wastewaters generated by aircraft exterior cleaning solutions and de-icing/anti-icing agents
are very different. The washing of aircraft exteriors at the maintenance center of one major
commercial airline, which is believed to be representative of the methods used by other major air
carriers, begins with the aircraft being moved onto a "wash rack." The wash rack is paved and
beveled to direct wastewater to a catch basin. The washing operation consists of two steps:
spraying a solution of butyl cellosolve and scrubbing with brushes; and rinsing with water.
De-icing and anti-icing procedures are used at airports during cold and wet weather
conditions. Aircraft and the airport pavement are sprayed with de-icing and anti-icing solutions to
prevent icing and skidding. These solutions are generally a mixture of ethylene glycol or
propylene glycol and water. There is generally no central collection unit for recycling or disposal
of these wastes.
-------
17-5.
17.4 WASTE TYPES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY TODAY'S RULE
17.4.1 Truck, Rail, and Barge Tank Cleaning
Many types of wastewaters from the truck and railroad tank cleaning operations may be
affected by today's rule. This is primarily due to the high variability of the contents of the
wastewaters and the fact that practically any material being shipped may be a contaminant.
Although, as the PDS notes, the "tank barge cleaning subcategory is the largest contributor of .
pollutants causing exceedances of EPA criteria," the barge tank cleaning operations may be less
subject to this rule. Most wastewater storage and treatment appear to be conducted in other
barges (rather than in land-based units) before disposal to state-regulated surface waters.
Several truck and rail tank cleaning facilities have on-site wastewater collection and
treatment systems. Exhibit 17-2 presents a wastewater treatment schematic of a typical truck tank
cleaning facility that services about 40 tanks per day. Most trucks are accepted for cleaning at
this facility. Heels are segregated if incompatible with the facility's treatment system. The facility
offers hot and cold water rinses/washes, caustic washes, and presolve steps. The caustic solution is
captured for reuse. Average water use ranges between 20,000 to 22,000 gallons per day.
Wastewater treatment at this facility consists of initial settling and equalization in an old tank
truck followed by coagulation and settling in a reactor clarifier. Ferric chloride and lime are used
as coagulants. The resultant sludge is removed periodically for disposal.
17.4.2 Aircraft Exterior Cleaning and De-icing/Anti-icing
Wastewater from aircraft exterior cleaning generally goes directly from catch basins to a
local treatment plant. Aircraft exterior cleaning solutions are primarily water and butyl cellulose
mixtures. Generally, facilities use a 60-40 or 70-30 water to chemical solution. Exhibit 17-3
presents a schematic illustrating the aircraft exterior cleaning and waste management process. In
general, chemicals such as ethylene glycol and propylene glycbl in water-based solutions are
applied to aircraft exteriors and airport pavement for purposes of de-icing and anti-icing. Most
facilities apply these chemicals with water using a 50:50 water to chemical mixture. Wastewaters
are generally collected via stormwater collection systems.
At the point of generation, these aircraft cleaning and de-icing/anti-icing wastes are likely
not hazardous for the purposes of this rule. First, there does not appear to be acidic or alkaline
components in use that would cause the wastewater to be corrosive or reactive. Second, the
water content in the stream would most likely inhibit ignitability. Third, there are no known TC
organic chemicals or pesticides in this waste stream. Thus, aircraft wastewaters are not likely to
be affected by this rule. Nevertheless, the data described in the next section were assessed to
verify this finding.
17.5 AVAILABLE DATA
Several data sources were used for obtaining information on the generation and
management of the wastes by the transportation and equipment cleaning industry; A description
of the data sources is given in Chapter 3 of the main text of the background document. The
applicable information obtained from these data sources is provided in the sections below.
-------
EXHIBIT 17-2
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SCHEMATIC
(TYPICAL TANK TRUCK CLEANING FACILITY)
MIUHMMM
WMSIIWMIM
IOKIIW
IOCAMON
UUNX
kAMIIf IfKAUM
'HOIIT caam o Nuut
CIMINM:! iR>im
-------
EXHIBIT 17-3
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SCHEMATIC
(TYPICAL AIRCRAFT EXTERIOR CLEANING FACILITY)
CAICHIASM.
•OTCOVMHMIA
OIICN Mmtwxitm
AtUIMI WMTtNMtM
\
trruKNt
«mun
WMIIIMtBI
Mint IOUAION
Source: U.S EPA, 1989, op. cit.
-------
17-8
17.5.1 Preliminary Data Summary
EPA's Office of Water developed the PDS4 to obtain a basic level of familiarity with the
practices of the TEC industry and to obtain an estimate of the pollutant loadings from those
operations. The PDS effort was part of the effluent limitations development process.
The PDS study identified 111 organic pollutants (including pesticides and herbicides) in
wastewaters at TEC facilities. Of these, 50 are on EPA's Priority Pollutant List, 52 are RCRA
hazardous constituents, 72 are CERCLA hazardous substances, and five are known or suspected
human carcinogens. All 13 priority pollutant metals were found.
Eight facilities were sampled for the PDS:
• Three truck tank facilities;
• Two rail tank car cleaning operations;
• Two tank barge cleaning facilities; and
• One aircraft exterior cleaning facility.
At one of the three truck tank facilities, several organic pollutants were found at high
levels in raw wastewater. The sludge separated from the wastewater at this facility—although not
part of this rule—could be considered RCRA hazardous waste, because it exhibited the
characteristic of ignitability (D001).
One of the two rail tank car cleaning operations separated its "hazardous" and
"nonhazardous" wastewater and heel mixtures. Those wastes that can be treated using the
facility's biological treatment system (equalization and aeration with activated sludge) are routed
to the wastewater treatment facility. The remaining wastes are considered hazardous and are
disposed in an on-site injection well. Exhibit 17-4 presents a schematic of this facility.
Samples from these eight facilities were used as representative samples of raw and treated
effluent and sludges from the truck, rail and barge subsector. Attachment 17-1 presents the data
on pollutant loadings that EPA derived in the PDS, as well as a comparison of the constituent
concentrations with the UTS where there was available data. Many constituents were found to be
above UTS.
The PDS reports that wastewaters from the TEC industry are a complex mixture of many
pollutants due to the high variability of the heels contained in the tanks. The wastewaters tend to
be alkaline and have pH levels of 12 or higher. In addition, the wastewater typically contains 20
to 50 specific volatile and semivolatile organic pollutants from the List of Analytes compiled by
EPA's Industrial Technology Division. Finally, the PDS review of the analytical data for the .
facilities with physical-chemical treatment indicates that none of the treatment systems provided
consistent or high levels of treatment.
The PDS also estimates pollutant loadings in the wastewater from facilities in the tank
truck, rail tank, tank barge, and aircraft exterior subsectors of the TEC industry. In these
U.S. EPA, 1989, op. cit.
-------
EXHIBIT 17-4
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SCHEMATIC
(TYPICAL RAIL TANK CLEANING FACILITY)
tANIAMV WUIINMIM
MIUTMI rum
»IUTMII
IOCMBN
Source: U.S EPA, 1989, op. cit
-------
17-10
estimates, the quantities of wastewater discharged by different types of TEC facilities were
assumed to vary from 5,000 to 18,000 gallons per day. It was also assumed that TEC facilities
work typically for six days a week or 312 days per year.
17.5.2 POTW Report to Congress (RTC)
EPA reviewed the RTC5 and did not find any applicable information for this analysis.
17.53 Biennial Reporting System (BRS)
The 1991 BRS data on the TEC industry are particularly difficult to obtain because
facilities that conduct transportation equipment cleaning operations do not share a single SIC
code. TEC facilities that clean truck, rail, and barge tanks may identify themselves by using any
of the SIC codes listed in Section 17.3.
Data for the top 25 facilities that reported ICRT wastes are in Attachment 17-2. The
Agency searched the BRS GM forms for all transportation facilities that managed wastes on site.
EPA identified four facilities that appear to be TEC facilities and that generate potentially
affected wastes and whose descriptions of the waste may have stated the origin of the waste as
tank cleaning or were general descriptions of waste that may have been a result of tank cleaning.
Exhibit 17-5 presents the TEC facilities that manage wastes on site. Treatment system
information is also included for these four facilities. -
17.5.4 Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
EPA reviewed the TRI and did not find any applicable information for this analysis.
17.5.5 Permit Compliance System (PCS)
The Agency investigated the frequency of transportation facilities (by SIC code) in the
PCS that might be using land-based units. The SIC codes used for this category were : 37, 40,
42, 44, and 45. The PCS survey identified 1,036 transportation facilities. Of these, 99 facilities
provided some type of treatment train and approximately 11 of them (11 percent) reported using
treatment trains that are likely to be land-based units.
17.5.6 Industrial Subtitle D Screening Survey
For the analysis of these data, SIC code 37 was included in the Transportation Equipment
category. The analysis revealed that there were approximately 8,085 generators and 121 (1.5
percent) of these facilities operate surface impoundments. Less than one percent (0.1 percent) of
the transportation equipment facilities have land application units. The total quantity of waste
managed in surface impoundments is 9.63 million metric tons. The total quantity of waste
managed in land application units is 242 metric tons. Across industries, the average percentage of
land-based units is 12 percent. EPA did not use these data, however, because the definition of
5 U.S. EPA, 1986 (February), Report to Congress on the Discharge of Hazardous Waste to Publicly
Owned Treatment Works, Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
-------
17-11
TEC used in this survey was much broader than the definition used in the other data sources in
this capacity analysis. -
17.5.7 Industry Studies Database (ISDB)
EPA reviewed the ISDB and did not find any applicable information for this analysis.
EXHIBIT 17-5
BRS DATA FOR GENERATORS THAT MANAGE WASTE ON SITE
EPA ID
ALD095704011
NCD006997795
PA4170022418
TXD981046345
Name
Suttles Truck Leasing
Inc.
US Air
Philadelphia Naval
Base
Groendyke Transport
Inc.
Treatment
System
Sludge dewatering
Chrome
reduction
followed by
chemical
precipitation
Other treatment
Deepwell/
underground
injection
Quantity
(tons)
<1
5,084.2
189.7
123.9
>*•"
Waste
Codes
D001
D006, D007,
D008, D039
D002, D006,
D007, D008
D001
Description
Waste flammable liquids
from cleaning of refuse
in tank; Trailers to meet
RCRA-empty standards
Wastewater influent to
waste pretreatment plant
«
Wastewater from
cleaning operations
Tank drainings and
flushings
17.5.8 Industry Contacts
EPA contacted several facilities to follow-up on data obtained from the above sources. A,
summary of the information obtained is provided in Exhibit 17-6. For example, a few barge
cleaning facilities were called to confirm that such facilities do not use land-based units. Also, a
contact from at least one of the barge cleaning facilities indicated that he does not believe that
his facility generates ICRT wastes. Telephone logs of these conversations are presented in
Attachment 17-3.
, . The contacts indicated that wastewaters are usually discharged to POTWs after some
amount of treatment on-site. Untreated wastewater or treatment residuals are often shipped off-
site to commercial waste management facilities. The data provided by a facility that cleans tanks
that contained propane gas and food grade products showed that slightly above 600 gallons of
wastewater was generated from cleaning each tank car. Even after assuming that each tank uses
1,000 gallons of water, the annual generation of wastewater for cleaning 1.6 million units every
year (707 facilities) is estimated to be 6.9 million tons per year (less than 10,000 tons per facility).
-------
17-12
EXHIBIT 17-6
SUMMARY OF TELEPHONE LOGS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
EQUIPMENT CLEANING INDUSTRY
Company Name
Continental Grain
Dulles International
Airport
IBS Railcar Service
Center
Kiesel Marine (barge
cleaner)
Maryland Rail Car,
Inc.
Riverway Harbor
Service St. Louis, Inc.
Suttles Truck Leasing,
Inc.
ICRT
Wastes
No
No
No.
Yes
No
No/?
Yes
Land-
Based
Units
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Constituent
Concentration
above UTS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
No?
Quantity
Discharged
(gal/year)
30,000 to
40,000
120,000
4,200,000
to
5,400,000
NA
. 60,000
NA
12,000,000
Direct
Discharger
No
Yes
No
No
No '
No
No
Indirect
Discharger
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No'
Yes
Zero
Discharger
No
No
• No
Yes?
No
Yes '
No
NA - Data not available
The average consumption of water at TEC facilities is then estimated to be approximately 7,500
gallons per day (which falls within the range of wastewater quantities considered in PDS).
17.5.9 Comments to Previous Rules
EPA reviewed comments to previous rules and did not find any applicable information for
this analysis.
17.5.10 Screening Surveys
There are two "screening surveys" for this industry: (1) one for tanker trucks, rail tank
cars, barges, etc; and (2) one for external aircraft cleaning and aircraft and pavement de-icing and
anti-icing. Data from the second screening survey are not available.
The U.S. EPA Tank and Container Interior Cleaning Screening Survey was completed in
1994 for this industry sector. This survey is included in Attachment 17-4. EPA compiled the
survey data in tables presented in Attachment 17-5. Data from this survey were used to refine
the estimate of TEC facilities .identified in the PDS. Screening survey data revealed that there
are 707 TEC facilities, out of which EPA assumes 507 are rail car and tank car cleaning facilities.
-------
17-13
The screening survey indicates that 76 to 213 facilities use land-based units. Double-
counting in many categories of the survey data made it difficult to determine the exact number or
a narrower range of facilities using land-based units. For example, one facility may use more than
one type of land-based unit. EPA identified four types of land-based units: (1) evaporation
ponds, (2) non-aerated lagoons, ponds, and basins, (3) sedimentation or settling ponds, and (4)
equalization. The screening survey indicated that at most five facilities use all of the first three
types of land-based units. On this basis, EPA determined the upper bound of the estimate to be
213. However, the survey did not indicate that any facilities use all three types of land-based
units. Thus, on the basis that no facilities use all three types of land-based units, and that all
equalization occurs in tanks, EPA determined the lower bound of the estimate to be 76.
The 707 TEC facilities are reported to generate 10.8 billion tons of wastewater per year
(about 15 million tons per facility). This estimate of wastewater quantities appears to be
inconsistent with the estimates using the annual number of cleanings (1.6 million) performed on
different types of units reported in the same survey and data on quantities per cleaning obtained
from industrial contacts. The screening survey also is inconsistent with estimates obtained from
the PDS. Extrapolating additional information from the survey data was difficult due to double-
counting. For example, a facility may transport more than one commodity, use more than one
cleaning operation, and discharge to more than one destination. Despite this limitation, EPA was
able to determine that many facilities transport petroleum and coal products; food grade products;
latex, rubber, and resins; and soaps and detergents. At least 96 percent, of the facilities use water
washes as part of their cleaning operations. Approximately half of all facilities use detergent
washes and/or caustic washes as part of their cleaning operations. Finally, the majority of facilities
discharge to a POTW either exclusively, or in addition to other disposal destinations.
17.6 REQUIRED CAPACITY ANALYSIS
This section presents an estimate of the number of facilities and quantity of wastewater
affected by today's rule. EPA has made the following assumptions in order to more accurately
assess the impact of today's rule on this industry:
• Data sources did not indicate that air transportation cleaners generate ICRT
wastes. Therefore, based on discussions with industry contacts, EPA has assumed
that the air transportation cleaning sector of this industry does not generate ICRT
wastes.
• The barge-cleaning facilities do not use land-based units in their treatment system.
EPA has based this assumption on information gathered from industry contacts.
• Based on data obtained from the PDS, all tank truck cleaners and rail car cleaning
facilities are assumed to generate ICRT wastewaters. Industry contacts indicate
that the actual percentage of facilities generating ICRT wastes may be lower.
However, this information is anecdotal and is difficult to extrapolate to the entire
industry.
• Based on data obtained from the Screening Survey, EPA estimated that 76 to 213
tank and rail car cleaners use land-based units.
-------
17-14
• The average discharge of wastewater per facility is estimated to be 7,500 gallons
per day based on PDS, TEC screening survey, and industry contacts. The annual
quantity of wastewater generated by each facility is assumed to be 9,750 tons based
on 312 days of operation per year.
• All facilities generate wastewaters with constituents above UTS, based on the PDS
data. Also, no constituents are assumed to be regulated by CWA because a
development document has not yet been completed for this industry.
Based on these assumptions and the data collected, EPA assumes that all TEC facilities
have constituents above UTS. Assuming that 11 to 42 percent of the facilities use land-based
units, EPA estimates that approximately 76 to 213 facilities will be affected by today's rule. In
order to determine the quantity of wastewaters affected because of these facilities, EPA assumes
that each facility generates 7,500 gallons per day of affected wastewater per year. Thus, the
affected facilities are expected to generate approximately 0.6 million to 1.6 million tons of
wastewater.
-------
ATTACHMENT 17-1
PDS RAW WASTE POLLUTANT LOADS & CONSTITUENTS ABOVE UTS
-------
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RAW WASTE POLLUTANT LOADS
TANK TRUCK INTERIOR CLEANING FACILITIES
Pollutant Croup
Volatile Organics
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventio&al Pollutants
Semivolatile Organics
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Pesticides and Herbicides
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Elements
Priority Pollutant Metals
Nonconventional Pollutants
Cyanide
Conventional Pollutants
Method A1'2
Ibs/year
950,000
6 T 960, 000
7,910,000
220,000
2,570,000
2,790,000
0
1,050,000
1,050,000
1,260,000
27,710,000
28,970,000
700
143,710,000
Method B1'3
Ibs/year
950,000
6,990.000
7,940,000
620,000
3.100.000
3,720,000
0
1,070,000
1,070,000
1,260,000
27.710,000
28,970,000
800
143,710,000
Method C1'4
Ibs/vear
1,300,000
12.100.000
13,400,000
750,000
14,590.000
15,340,000
0
2.240.000
2,240,000
1,260,000
27,710.000
28,970,000
1,000
143,710,000
1
2
Based on 400 facilities each operating 312 days per year and discharging
15,000 gallons per day of vastevater.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants vas
assumed to be zero if a specific value was hot reported.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be equal to the detection limit if a specific value was not
reported.
During calculations, only pollutant concentrations above detection limits
were considered.
-------
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RAW WASTE POLLUTANT LOADS
RAIL TANK CAR INTERIOR CLEANING FACILITIES
Pollutant Group
Volatile Organics
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Semivolatile_0rganics
Priority Pollutantr
Nonconventional Pollutants
Method A1 t2
Ibs/year
9,000
9.600
18,600
7,400
3.400
Method B1'3
Ibs /year
9,200
10.000
19 ,200
9,400
4.700
Method C1'
'Ibs/year
10,200
30,100
40,300
21,200
14,000
35,200
Pesticides and Herbicides
Priority"Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Elements
—NOT ANALYZED—
—NOT ANALYZED—
Priority Pollutant Metals
Nonconventional Pollutants
Cyanide
Conventional Pollutants
12,000
14,730,000
14,742,000
923
13,320,000
13,000
14,730,000
14,743,000
965
13,320,000
14,000
14.730.000
14,744,000
1,850
13,320,000
Based on 89 facilities each operating 312 days per year and discharging
18,000 gallons per day of wastewater.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be zero if a specific value vas not reported.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be equal to the detection limit if a specific value was not
required.
During calculations, only pollutant concentrations above detection limits
were considered.
-------
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RAW WASTE POLLUTANT LOADS
TANK BARGE INTERIOR CLEANING FACILITIES
Pollutant Group
Volatile Organic*
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Senivolatile Organic*
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Pesticides and Herbicides
"Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Elements
Priority Pollutant Metal*
Nonconventional Pollutants
Cyanide
Conventional Pollutants
Method A1'2
Ibs/year
19,340,000
13,880,000
33,220,000
2,400
800
3,200
10
10
20
3,700
3.890,000
3,893,700
270
19,660,000
Method B1'3
Ibs/year
19,340,000
13^880^000
33,220,000
18,600
16.500
35,100
10
1.300
1,310
4,300
3.890,000
3,894,300
310
19,680,000
Method CIM
Ibs/vear
48,830,000
28,640.000
77,470,000
9,000
4.200
13,200
20
20
40
4,400
3,900,000
3,904,400
540
29,720,000
Based on 196 facilities each operating 312 days per year and discharging
7,000 gallons per day of wastevater.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be zero if a specific value was not reported.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be equal to the detection liait if a specific value was not
required.
During calculations, only pollutant concentrations above detection limits
were considered.
-------
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RAW WASTE POLLUTANT LOADS
AIRCRAFT EXTERIOR CLEANING FACILITIES
Pollutant Group
Volatile Organic*
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Seaivolatile Organic*
Priority Pollutants
MoTirBfro^ptioml p^Jl^tant*
Pesticides and Herbicides
Priority Pollutants
Nonconventional Pollutants
Eleaents
Priority Pollutant Metals
Nonconventional Pollutants
•
Cyanide
Conventional Pollutants
Method A1'2
Ibs/year
57,800
3.100
60,900
35,400
8,000
43,400
0
3,500
3,500
11,900
345,000
356,900
0
14,530,000
Method Bl'a
Ibs/year
58,500
3.200
61,700
36,100
11,900
48,000
0
3.500
3,500
11,900
345.000
356,900
14
14,530,000
Method C1'4
Ibs/vear
115,600
6.100
121,700
70,800
16.000
86,800
0
3.500
3,500
11,900
345.000
356,900
0
14,530,000
1
2
3
Based on 4,300 commercial passenger aircraft, washed four times per year.
Each wash uses 5,000 gallons.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be zero if a specific value was not reported.
During calculations, the concentration of individual pollutants was
assumed to be equal to the detection limit if a specific value was not
required.
During calculations, only pollutant concentrations above detection limits
were considered.
-------
Facility A
Tank Truck Cleaning
Summary of Analytical Results
Constituent3
benzene
ethylbenzene
toluene
2-chloronaphthalene
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acidb
arsenic
Concentration (mg/1)
5.566
1.064
0.534
3.850
1380
2.020
U.T.S. (mg/1)
0.140
0.057
0.080
0.055
0.720
1.400
" Unless otherwise noted, these constituents are considered priority pollutants.
b Non-priority pollutant.
NOTE: The wastewater treatment process at this facility consists of equalization, pH adjustment,
coagulation, and dissolved air flotation. One of the treatment system components is a 7,000-gallon batch
pH adjustment tank.
-------
Facility B
Tank Truck Cleaning
Summary of Analytical Results
Constituent8
acetoneb
ethylbenzene
methylene chloride
toluene
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
di-n-octyl pbthalate
naphthalene
Concentration
Day 1
(mg/I)
140.526
0.685
13.730
15.295
0.582
0.114
0.081
Concentration
Day 2
(mg/I)
—
1.102
7.474
25.869
0.284
—
0.175
U.T.S.
(mg/1)
0280
0.057
0.089
0.080
0.054
flLDl?
0.059
3 Unless otherwise noted, these constituents are considered priority pollutants.
b Non-priority pollutant.
NOTE: The waterwater treatment at this facility consists of equalization, pH adjustment, coagulation,
and sedimentation. Treatment system components include an old tank truck and a Dorr-Oliver reactor
clarifier.
-------
Facility C
Tank Truck Cleaning
Summary of Analytical Results
Constituent3
acetoneb
ethylbenzene
methylene chloride
toluene
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
beptachlor epoxide
arsenic
Concentration
Day 1
(mg/1)
6,524.2
2.018
0.070*
—
0.073
—
2.200
Concentration
Day 2
(mg/1)
228336
0.126
0.095
0201
0.026*
0.751
2.100
U.T.S.
(mg/1)
0280
0.057
0.089
0.080
0.054
0.016
1.400 -
° Unless otherwise noted, these constituents are considered priority pollutants.
b Non-priority pollutant.
Below the U.T.S.
NOTE: Wastewater treatment at this facility includes equalization, pH adjustment, coagulation,
sedimentation, activated carbon adsorption, and filtration. Equalization and pH adjustment are completed in
separate tanks. Coagulation-sedimentation occur in a rectangular clarifier, baffled to create a serpentine flow
path. Finally, the wastewater runs through a 40 m paper filter.
-------
Facility A
Summary of Analytical Results Rail Tank Car
Constituent3
acetone15
benzene
chloroform
methylene chloride
toluene
acenapthene
acenaphthylene
anthracene
benzo(a)anthracene
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
naphthalene
nitrobenzene
phenanthrene
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
zinc
Biological
Treatment
(mg/1)
12.757
0.768
0.428
. . —
2.127
—
—
0.110
—
—
0.164
—
0.151
0.061
—
0.061
2.720
Biological
Treatment
(mg/1)
—
0.164
0^049
—
O254
0.065
0.074
— .
—
—
—
_
— •
_
0^049 .
—
0342*
Injection
Well
(mg/1)
—
0210
—
0.100
0.038*
—
—
—
~
0.134 .
0.276
1.867
—
«_
— .
—
9.360
Injection
Well
(mg/1)
—
0.100*
—
0.125
0.064*
0.224
—
—
0.063
—
0.114
—
0.220
.—
.
—
0.924*
U.T.S.
(mg/1)
0.280
0.140
0.046
0.089
0.080
0.059
0.059
0.059
0.059
0.033
0.059
0.068
0.059
0.044
0.320
0.035
2.610
3 Unless otherwise noted, these constituents are considered priority pollutants.
b Non-priority pollutant.
Below the U.T.S.
NOTE: "Non-hazardous" washwaters are combined with other wastewaters at this facility for equalization. The
next step in the treatment process is activated sludge treatment. Finally, the wastewatcr is discharged to surface
water. "Hazardous" washwaters at this facility are collected and stored in tanks, and then sent through a 5 pm
filter to an injection well.
-------
Facility B
Rail Tank Car
Summary of Analytical Results
Constituent3
benzene
toluene
acenaptbene
acenaphthylene
anthracene
chrysene
flouranthene
flourene
naphthalene
phenanthrene
phenol
pyrene
sulfideb
Raw Waste
Dayl
(mg/1)
1.764
0.420
0.013*
—
0.034*
• ' • ~
0.020*
0.035*
0.341
0.058*
0.065*
0.013*
—
Raw Waste
Day 2
(mg/1)
5.571
0.476
0.300
0,106
1.996
0.151
0.506
0.806
-
1.436
0.572
0.340
25.000
U.T.S.
(mg/1)
0.140
0.080
0.059
0.059
0.059
0.059
0.068
0.069.
0.059
0.059
0.039
0.067
14.000
Unless otherwise noted, these constituents are considered priority pollutants.
b Non-priority pollutant. . -
Below the U.T.S. •',-"'
NOTE: Wastewater treatment at this facility includes equalization followed by activated sludge treatment.
Washwaters are collected in trenches beneath the rail cars and piped to an aerated surge tank where they are
combined with wastewater and filtrate from the sludge press. The combined wastewater is pumped to a Dorr-
Oliver primary clarifier before it is discharged to a series of two aeration basins for final clarification.
-------
ATTACHMENT 17-2
TOP 25 FACILITIES REPORTING ICRT WASTES IN THE BRS
-------
BRS 91 Overs i,
DATE : 11/16/94
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 1
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
ALD095704011 SUTTLES TRUCK LEASING INC
DEMOPOLIS
3. 4231 2-On-slte cleanup 8-Unknoun
0.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/City)
Waste Codes
A19-Cleaning & Degreasing . ' .
B204-0rganic Liquid
WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS FROM CLEANING OF RESIDUE IN TANK TRAILERS TO MEET RCRA-EMPTY STANDARDS
SECTION 1V-IN THE YEAR OF 1991 THE COMPANY RETURNED TRAILERSUITH HEELS LEFT ON THEM to GENERATORS FOR CLEANINO
1-No TRI Report
HlOI-Sludge Trtmt/17,885.8
D001
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
CA8570024143 MATHER AIR FORCE BASE
SACRAMENTO
4 4581 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
0.2 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A57-One-time & Intermit. Process
B210-0rganic Liquid
ADHESIVES. EXCESS OR OUTDATED ADHESIVES
SEC II D • MATERIAL USED BY ANOTHER GENERATOR ON BASE.
1-No .TRI Report
M032-0ther Recovery/0.0
D001
CA8570024143 MATHER AIR FORCE BASE SACRAMENTO 13 4581 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
Source Code : A22-Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : B103-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : MISCELLANEOUS ACIDS - WASTE MISCELLANEOUS ACIDS FROM PLATING SHOP (BEING CLOSED DOWN) AND SURPLUS ACIDS NOT REQUIRED ANY
0.6 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - GM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 2 '
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
.Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
LONGER.
Comments :
CAS Numbers :
TRI Constituent : 1-No TRI Report
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : H121-0ther Trtrat/0.0
Waste Codes : D002
CA8570024143 MATHER AIR FORCE BASE
SACRAMENTO
15 4581 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
1.5 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A19-Cleaning & Degreesing
B203-0rganic Liquid
MISCELLANEOUS ORGANICS OFF • SPECIFICATION, AGED, OR SURPLUS ORGANfCS.
SEC II - OM SITE 1 - MATERIAL USED BY ANOTHER BASE GENERATOR '
1-No TRI Report
M032-0ther Recovery/0.0
D001
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
CAD077184745 FMC CORP.-GROUND SYS.DIV.
SAN JOSE
10 3795 . 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
75,062.6 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste"Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
B103-Inorganic Liquid
DILUTE METAL PLATING, PHOSPHATING AND CHROMATING RINSEWATERS AND PROCESS SOLUTIONS; CADMIUM, LEAD, NICKEL, CHROMIUM, ZIH
c- ''.••'.
SECTION I, BOX F OTHER CODES: A23, A24, A29 (CHROMATING) BOX H OTHER CODE B106
07440-02-0 07664-38-2 07664-93-9
3-TRI Constituent^)
-------
BRS 91 Overs . - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 3
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/75,062.6
Waste Codes : 0006 D007 D008 D002
CAD077184745 FMC CORP.-GROUND SYS.DIV.
SAN JOSE
12 3795 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
9,669.9 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A29-Surface Prep and Finish
B103-Inorganic Liquid
HAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS FROM METAL SURFACE FINISHING USING CHROMIC ACID (CHROMATE CONVERSION COATING OF ALUMINUM); CORROSI
VES CONTAINING CHROMIUM.
SECTION I, BOX F; CHROMATE CONVERSION COATING
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/9,669.9
D002 0007
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Totat/RCRA)
PS Page System
57~~ M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 9,499.3 / 9,499.3 • 50,101.7 / 50,101.7 9,499.3 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
67.4/ 67.4
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type : 01-Tank •
Description : TREATMENT OF 0002 AND D007 WASTE CHROMIC ACID SOLUTIONS BY ACID CHROMIUM REDUCtlON.
Comment : SECTION II, BOX A: QUANTITY ESTIMATED
58
M073-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 100.2 / 100.2
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
1992
4,175.1 / 4,175.1
Future Avail. Code
1
100.2 / 100.2
X Future Capacity
0.7 / 0.7
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
03-POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 4
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
Description
Comment
GH Origin 1991 Tons
City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated
: TREATMENT OF DILUTE CADMIUM CYANIDE PLATING RINSEUATERS (0002, 0003, 0006, F007) BY ALKALINE CHLORINATION.
: SECTION II, BOX A: QUANTITY ESTIMATED. CYANIDE WASTE GENERATING PROCESS REPLACED IN 1991. NO FURTHER CYANIDE WASTES WILL
BE GENERATED. THIS TREATMENT SYSTEM WILL BE CLOSED.
Radio-
active
59 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 75,062.6 / 75,062.6 375,312.8 / 375,312.8 75,062.6 / 0.0 544.6 / 544.6
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEUTRALIZATION. PRECIPITATION, FLOCCULATION, SETTLING AND-FILTRATION OF METAL-BEARING WASTEWATERS FROM ELECTROPLATING AN
D METAL SURFACE FINISHING.
Conment : SECTION I. BOX B: ADDITIONAL PROCESS TYPES; M101 SECTION II, QUANTITIES ESTIMATED
60 M032-0ther Recovery 100.0 / 0.0 ' 416.5 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 • ,
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank 10-Tank
Description : RECYCLING OF OIL-IN-UATER EMULSION METAL WORKING FLUID BY CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATION OF FREE-PHASE OIL AND SOLID PARTICULATE
•S. .
Conment : SECTION I, BOX B: CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATION OF OIL AND WATER BOX E: CENTRIFUGE
61 MOK-Hetals Recovery 0.0/0.0 2.1/2.1 0.0/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 03-Permanently Closed
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : SILVER RECOVERY FROM SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM PROCESSING SOLUTIONS BY ELECTROLYTIC DEPOSITION.
Comment : SECTION I, BOX B: ELECTROLYTIC DEPOSITION FROM SOLUTION. THIS UNIT IS PENDING RCRA CLOSURE.
62 M123-0ther Trtmt 5,421.2/0.0 166,805.7/0.0 5,421.2/0.0 2.5/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
-------
BRS 91 Overs • GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16A, Page 5
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
City
01-Operational
01-Tank
GRAVITY SEPARATION OF OIL AND WATER IN OIL-WATER
FIVE (5) SEPARATE UNITS TREATING WASTEUATER FROM
GH Origin
Page SIC Code
CLARIFIER UNITS.
VEHICLE WASHING STATIONS.
1991 Tons Radio-
Point of Measurement Generated active
63 MIZS-Other Trtmt 27.1 / 0.0
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
50.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
27.1 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : ID-Tank
Description : HYDRAULICALLY OPERATED COMPACTOR WHICH CRUSHES MATERIAL INSIDE A 55 GAL STEEL DRUM. MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED IS LOADED
MANUALLY
Comment : SECTION I BOX B: VOLUME REDUCTION BY MECHANICAL COMPACTION I E: HYDRAULICALLY OPERATED MECHANICAL COMPACTOR
CAD980882419 UNITED AIRLINES
SAN FRANCISCO
2 4581 1-On-site activity 4-After nix of HW & non-HU
113.6 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
AS1-One-time & Intermit. Process
B205-0rganic Liquid
ADDITIONAL SOURCE CODES A53, ATS ADDITIONAL FQRM CODE B310
1-No TRI Report
M124-0ther Trttnt/84.5 I
D001 0006 D002 D005
PS Page System
3 M124-0ther Trtmt
Sec.lll-A. New Max. Oper.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
84.5 / 84.5
(Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.6 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
M / 7.1
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 10-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/16/94
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
CM & PS Forms (As of
Page 6
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
Description
Comment
City
: VERTICAL TUBE COALESCING FUEL/WATER SEPERATOR
:
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
1991 Tons
Point of Measurement Generated
Radio-
active
CAD982445934 TRW PRESSURE SYSTEMS INC
CITY OF COMMERCE
3 3795 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2.7 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A27-Surface Prep and Finish
B103-Inorganic Liquid
CONTAMINATED AND SATURATED HYDROFLUORIC ACID/NITRIC ACID FROM ETCHING OPERATIONS; MIXTURE OF HYDROFLUORIC ACID 3X, NITRI
C 30X AND 67X WATER.
1-No.TRI Report
H121-0ther Trtmt/0,0
D002
CAD982445934 TRW PRESSURE SYSTEMS INC
CITY OF COMMERCE
4 3795 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
2.4 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Garments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A02-Cleaning & Degreasing . ,
B103-Inorganic Liquid
CONTAMINATED AND SPENT NITRIC ACID FROM CLEANING OPERATIONS; MIXTURE OF NITRIC ACID 30X AND WATER.
1-No TRI Report
H121-Other Trtmt/0.0
0002
PS Page System
10
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
M121-0ther Trtmt 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
% Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
-------
BRS 91 OversI
DATE : 11/16/V-,
CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 7
File : IH11RUM1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
11
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : OS-Planned, Not Constructed
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHEMICAL NEUTRALIZATION OF D002 WASTES TO ACHIEVE NEUTRAL PH.
Comment :
M125-0ther Trtmt 57.6 / 0.0 259.2 / 0.0
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code
59.3 / 0.0
Future Capacity
0.2 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RECYCLING OF NON RCRA WASTE MACHINE COOLANT BY CENTRIFUGE AND TANK SYSTEM.
Comment :
FLD086241957 WELLCRAFT MARINE CORP #2
AVON PARK
5 3732 '1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
27.7 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
AOS-Cleaning & Degreasing
8203-Organic Liquid
WASTE DIACETONE ALCOHOL
00123-42-2
2-No TRI Constituent
M021-Solvents Recovery/27.7
D001
PS Page System
7 M021-Solvents Recovery
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Sec.III-A.
115.0 / 115.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
284.3 / 284.3
Future Avail. Code
112.8 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
2.2 / 2.2
N 0.0 / 0.0
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
1900
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 8
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
. Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-Operational
01-Tank
SOLVENT DISTILLATION
GAD006924872 DELTA AIR LINES INC
ATLANTA
50 4512 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
0.8 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
A89-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B205-0rganic Liquid
THIS WASTE COMES FROM THE STEAMING OF OIL AND FUEL FROM ABSORBENT; INFLUENT FOR PS FORM PAGE 63.
PROCESSED THROUGH STEAM OPERATION. STEAM IS USED TO PUSH WASTE OILS AND FUEL FROM ABSORBENT INTO INDUSTRIAL DRAIN TO WAS
TE TREATMENT PLANT.
1-No TRI Report
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/0.8
Waste Codes : D001
PS Page
62
63
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
System
M094-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt 55,745.0 / 55,745.0 ' 106,543.0 / 106,543.0 55,745.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
86.2 / 86.2
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type . : 01-Tank
Description : TREATMENT OF PLATING WASTE BY CHEMICAL REDUCTION AND PRECIPITATION. THIS PROCESS GENERATES 486 PLATINC WASTE SLUDGE SHOW
N OH GH PAGE 15.
Comment : I: THE PROCESS IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 486 PLATING WASTE SLUDGE.
H083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 14.4 / 0.8 19.5 / 19.5 2.6 / 0.8
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code ' X Future Capacity
13.7 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 11-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
-------
BRS 91 Oversig.
DATE : 11/16/94
GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 9
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
64
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
Unit Type : 10-Tank
Description : THIS IS A STEAM SYSTEM USED TO REMOVE MISC. FUELS AND WASTE Oil FROM ABSORBENT MATERIAL. OILS AND FUELS ARE PROCESSED TH '
ROUGH WASTE PLANT ABSORBENT.
Comment : 11-A: QUANTITY ESTIMATED. THIS WASTE IS ABSORBENT SATURATED WITH FUEL AND OIL. THE ABSORBENT IS STEAMED UNDER PRESSURE T
0 REMOVE OILS AND FUELS FROM ABSORBENT. THE ABSORBENT IS THEN NO LONGER HAZARDOUS* THE EFFLUENT GOES TO OUR WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT.
M091-Aqueous In/Organic Trtmt 1,221,810.0 / 1,633.1 1,827,000.0 / 365.0 1,221,810.0 / 0.0 1,633.1 / 1,633.1
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 06-RCRA/POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-Tank
TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER FROM WASTE TREATMENT PLANT THROUGH CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION AND BIOLOGICAL OXIDATION.
65 M061-Fuel Blending
205.7 / 205.7
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
867.4 / 867.4
Future Avail. Code
205.7 / 205.7
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : FUELS BLENDING OF WASTE OILS AND FUEL. ,
Comment : II-B: DELTA CURRENTLY MANAGES TWO 5,000 GALLON STORAGE TANKS FOR FUELS BLENDING. ONLY ONE TANK IS FILLED AT A TIME.
MAD000846303 GTE LABORATORIES
WALTHAM
4 3734 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
0.9 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A94-Other Processes
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
LABORATORY WASTE WATER CONTAINING ACID
1-No TRI Report
M121-Other Trtmt/0.9
D002
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM 8 PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 10
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name City
CM origin
Page SIC • Code Point of Measurement
1991 Tons Radio-
Generated active
PS Page
1
System Influent (Total/RCRA)
H121-0ther Trtmt 37,500.0 / 0.9
Sec. Ill -A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA)
75,000.0 / 5.0 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION OF MINERAL ACIDS (0002) IN PLANT WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.
Comment : PH NEUTRALIZATION TO TREAT THE 0003 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WASTE.
ME7170022019 PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD
KITTERY
3 3731 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
50.4 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Conments
CAS Numbers
TR1 Constituent
Onsite Info (Svstem/Oty)
Waste Codes
A19-Cleaning & Degreasing
8119-Inorganic Liquid
ACIDS AND ALKALINES (CORROSIVE MATERIAL) USED 4N METAL CLEANING,
B119 = SPENT ACID AND CAUSTIC
8-Unknown
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/50.4
0002 '
PS Page System
1 M014-Metals Recovery
Sec.llI-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
6.0 / 6.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
6.0 / 6.0
Future Avail. Code
6.0 / 6.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
6.0 / 6.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
01-Operational
02-Contafner ,
SILVER RECOVERY (TOXIC) FROM PHOTOGRAPHIC SOLUTION
-------
BRS 91 Overs I g.
DATE : 11/16/94
GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 11
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 611.2 / 50.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
611.2 / 50.4
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 50.4
X Future Capacity
48.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
01-RCRA
01-Operational
01-Tank
CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF D002 WASTE
H021-Solvents Recovery . 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 06-Other
Unit Type :
Description : SOLVENT RECOVERY UNIT (PAINT SOLVENTS)
Comment : SOLVENT UNITS WERE NOT OPERATIONAL DURING 1991
M129-0ther Trtmt 1.4 / 0.4
Sec.llI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1.4 / 0.4
Future Avail. Code
0.4 / 0.4
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 01-RCRA
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type ' : 02-Container
Description : DESTRUCTION OF AEROSOL CANS IN AN AEROSOL CAN PUNCTURER
Comment :
3 3743 1-On-slte activity 1-Before mix
MID094529286 GRAND TRUNK WEST R R CAR SHOP PORT. HURON
Source Code : A03-Cleaning & Degreasing
Form Code : B110-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION FROM CLEANING VATS.
Comnents : SECTION IV, BOX B - ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION ON-SITE PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO P.O.T.U.
CAS Numbers :
18.1 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 12
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID.
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
. Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 .Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
TRJ Constituent : 1-Mo TRl Report
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : H121-Other Trtmt/4.7
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
MOD043935048 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC.
KANSAS CITY
19 4581 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
196.4 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent .
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
: A03-Cleaning & Degreastng
: 8106-Inorganic Liquid
: WASTE CAUSTIC CLEANING SOLUTION.
: SECTION 3 A: QUESTION UNANSWERED; HOWEVER THERE IS INFORMATION IN SITE 1, BASED ON THIS INFORMATION, LLH AT DPRA ENTERED
"YES." . SECTION IH: PER JOE DAVIS, MDNR, RESPONSE WAS CHANGED FROM
'BLANK' TO '106' IN ORDER TO PASS ADVANCED DATA ASSESSMENT EDIT (MLH/DPRA) 03/23/93.
: 1-No TRI Report
: M121-0ther Trtmt/10.0
: D002 D006 D007 D008
MOD043935048 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC.
KANSAS CITY
40 4581 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
9.3 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Contnents
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
B103-Inorganic Liquid
WASTE SULFURIC ACID FROM PLATING OPERATIONS.
1-No TRI Report
H121-0ther Trtmt/5.0
0002 0007 .
-------
BRS 91 Overs i.
DATE : 11/16/9-
CM t PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 13
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
MOD043935048 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC.
KANSAS CITY
41 4581 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers •
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
B103-Inorganic Liquid
WASTE NITRIC ACID FROM PLATING OPERATIONS.
SECTION 4 A: QUESTION UNANSWERED; DUE TO LACK OF INFORMATION IN SECTION 4, LLH AT DPRA ENTERED "NO" IN BOX A.
1-No TRI Report
Ml21-0ther Trtmt/50.0
0002 0007 D006 D008 '
50.0 2-No
PS Page System
3 H021-Solvents Recovery
Sec.lll-A.
Influent (Total/RCRA)
40.6 / 40.6
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
75.0 / 75.0
Future Avail. Code
28.8 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NON-HALOGENATED FLAMMABLE SOLVENT RECYCLING BY DISTILLATION.
Comment :
M021-Solvents Recovery 14.1 / 14.1
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
75.0 / 75.0
Future Avail. Code
12.6 / 12.6
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 09-State
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : RECYCLING OF HALOGENATED SOLVENTS FROM VAPOR DECREASING AND CLEANING OPERATIONS.
Comment :
M074-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 9,121.7 / 9,121.7
62,552.1 / 62,552.1
»,121.7/ 9,121.7
Residual (Total/RCRA)
11.8 / 0.0
1.5 / 1.5
12.4 / 12.4
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 14
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
Sec.III-A.
N
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
City
Year of Change
1900
GM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ELECTROPLATING RINSE WATER AND CONCENTRATED PLATING SOLUTION TREATMENT PLANT USING CYANIDE OXIDATION, CHROME REDUCTION,
POLYMER ENHANCED METALS PRECIPITATION, ****SEE COMMENTS****
Comment : SEC 1 A: **CONT.**PH ADJUSTMENT, SLUDGE DEWATERING AND FILTERCAKE DRYING. COMMENTS: ALL DISCHARGES FROM THE CHEMICAL WA
STE WATER TREATMENT PLANT MEET FEDERAL PRETREATMENT STANDARDS. THE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATES UNDER A KANSAS
CITY, MO POTW PERMIT. THE SYSTEM IS A COMBINED CYANIDE DESTRUCTION AND CHROME REDUCTION WATER TREATMENT PLANT.
SECTION 3 A: QUESTION UNANSWERED; LLH AT DPRA MADE ASSUMPTION AND ENTERED "NO."
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 6,841.3/6,841.3 30,025.0/30,025.0 6,841.3/6,841.3 12.4/12.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank , ' .
Description : CHROME REDUCTION PORTION OF A COMBINED CYANIDE OXIDATION, CHROME REDUCTION, METALS PRECIPITATION, SLUDGE DEWATERING ELEC
TROPLATING RINSE WATER TREATMENT PLANT.
Conment' : SEC. 2 A: UOH IS 5 AND DENSITY IS ONE AND THE LBS/GAL AND SG BOX WERE LEFT BLANK THEREFORE LLH AT DPRA ENTERED AN X IN T
HE SG BOX. COMMENTS: THE SLUDGE/RESIDUAL QUANTITY IS THE AMOUNT GENERATED BY THE COMBINED PLANT AND NOT THE SLUDGE QUA
NT1TY RESULTING FROM THE TREATMENT OF THIS WASTESTEAM. ALL EFFLUENTS FROM THIS TREATMENT FACILITY MEET FEDERAL PRETREAT
MENT STANDARDS BEFORE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE KANSAS CITY, MO POTW. THIS TREATMENT PLANT IS ALSO USED TO TREAT CONCENTR
ATED PLATING WASTE BY PROPORTIONALLY HIKING THE CONCENTRATED WASTE WITH THE DILUTED RINSE WATERS.
M121-Other Trtmt 200.2 / 50/0 100.1 / 100.1 25.0 / 5.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0/0.0 1900
Regulatory Status
Operational status
Unit Type
Description
Cofnnent
03-POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank
CONCENTRATED ACID NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM USING LIME TO NEUTRALIZE NITRIC AND SULFURIC ACID.
THE EFFLUENT FROM THIS NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM IS ADDED TO THE CHROME REDUCTION INFFLUENT WASTE WATER. -
SECTION IIF: PER JOE DAVIS, MDNR, RESPONSE WAS CHANGED FROM 'BLANK1 TO '1' IN ORDER TO PASS,ADVANCED DATA ASSESSMENT ED
IT (MLH/DPRA) 03/23/93.
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 9.121.7 / 9,121.7 50,041.7 / 50,041.7 9,121.7 / 9,121.7 12.4 / 12.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
-------
BRS 91 Overs I c,.
DATE : 11/16/94
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 15
10
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : METALS PRECIPITATION PORTION OF A CYANIDE OXIDATION, CHROME REDUCTION, METALS PRECIPITATION/SLUDGE DEUATERING ELECTROPLA
TING RINSE WATER TREATMENT PLANT.
Comment : ALL EFFLUENT FROM THIS WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT MEET FEDERAL PRETREATMENT STANDARDS BEFORE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE KA
NSAS CITY, MO POTW. SEC. 2 A: UOM IS 5 AND DENSITY IS 1, THE LBS/GAL AND SG BOX WERE LEFT BLANK THEREFORE LLH AT DPRA E
NTERED AN X IN THE SG BOX.
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 2,280.4 / 2,280.4 20,016.7 / 20.016.7 2,280.4 / 2.280.4 12.4 / 12.4
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
03-POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank
CYANIDE OXIDATION PORTION OF A COMBINED CYANIDE OXIDATION, CHROME REDUCTION, METALS PRECIPITATION, SLUDGE DEWATERING ELE
CTROPLATING RINSE WAIER TREATMENT PLANT.
THE SLUDGE RESIDUAL QUANTITY IS OF THE COMBINED WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM NOT JUST OF THE TREATMENT OF THE CYANIDE HE
TALS WASTE STREAM. ALL DISCHARGES FROM THIS WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT MEET FEDERAL PRETREATHENT STANDARDS BEFORE BEIN
G RELEASED TO THE KANSAS CITY, MO POTW. SEC 2 C: UOM IS 5 AND DENSITY UNKNOWN THEREFORE BASED ON PREVIOUS INFORMATION A
ND GIVEN SPECIFIC GRAVITY LLH AT DPRA ENTERED "1"
NCD006997795 US AIR
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
WINSTON-SALEM
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt
B101-Inorganlc Liquid
WASTE WATER INFLUENT TO WASTE PRETREATMENT PLANT
1-No TRI Report
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/5,084.2
0006 D007 D008 D039
. 17 4512 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
5.084.2 2-No
PS Page System-
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • GM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 16
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
18 H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 5,084.2 / 5,084.2 26.150.0 / 26,150.0 5,019.2 / 0.0
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
65.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTU
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANY FOR NEUTRALIZATION AND •
CE HANGAR OPERATION.
Comment : REFERENCE SECTION II-C: INFLUENT QUANTITY IS MEASURED BY WATER USAGE. WE DO NO HAVE A MEANS OF MEASURING EFFLUENT QUANT
ITATIVELY. THE ONLY LOSS IN QUANTITY WOULD BE EVAPORATION.
PRECEPITATION OF METALS FROM I/W WATER STREAM FROM MAINTENAN
NCD067427922 MOEN INCORPORATED
SANFORD
4 3734 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
3,600.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Conments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
B107-Inorganic Liquid '
CYANIDE CONTAINING RINSEWATER
1-No TRI Report
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/3,600.0
D003
PS Page System
19 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Sec.III-A.
115,200.0 / 40,000.0
New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
216,000.0 / 216,000.0 113,200.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
84.2 / 84.2
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION
Comment : SECTION II, BOX A - ESTIMATE
SECTION II, BOX C - ESTIMATE
SECTION II, BOX B - ESTIMATE
-------
BUS 91 OversIg
DATE : 11/16/94
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
CM ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 17
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
20
21
22
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 14,400.0 / 14,400.0
Sec.I It-A. New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
21,600.0 / 21,600.0 14,400.0 / 14,400.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHROME REDUCTION
Comment : SECTION II, BOX A, ARE ESTIMATES
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 1.8/1.8
Sec.III-A. Neu Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
7.2 / 7.2
Future Avail. Code
1.8 / 6.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CYANIDE DESTRUCTION
Comment : SECTION II, BOX A,B, & C ARE ESTIMATES
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 115,200.0 / 40,000.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
216,000.0 / 216,000.0 1l5,116.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
84.2 / 84.2
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION
Comment : SECTION II, BOX A - ESTIMATE
SECTION II, BOX C • ESTIMATE
SECTION II, BOX B - ESTIMATE
PA4170022418 PHILADELPHIA NAVAL BASE PHILADELPHIA
Source Code : A04-Cleaning & Degreasing
Form Code : B114-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description : WASTE WATER FROM CLEANING OPERATIONS
Comments : SEC I. F : A02, A03
CAS Numbers :
1 3731 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
189.7 2-No
SEC II : MICRO-FILTRATION
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CH ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 18
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
CM
Page
SIC
. Origin
Code
Point
of
Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
TRI Constituent : 1-No TRI Report
Onsite Info (System/City} : H125-0ther Trtmt/189.7
Waste Codes : 0002 0006 D007 0008
System Influent (Total/RCRA)
H125-0ther Trtmt 1,047.1 / 210.6
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
1,047.1 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.5 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
C eminent
03-POTW
01-Operational •
01-Tank 10-Tank
NEUTRALIZATION AND FILTRATION OF HAZARDOUS AND NONHAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS
SEC I, E ! SYSTEM USES MICRO-SEPARATION FILTER SEC 1 : PRETREATMENT OF THIS WASTE IS PRIOR TO DISCHARGE INT
0 THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S SANITARY SEWER SEC II, D : SLUDGE WAS MANIFESTED OUT IN 1992, NO CM FORK SU
BMITTED '
MOZVSolvents Recovery 18.0 / 18.0
Sec.III-A. NeM Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
37.5 / 37.5
Future Avail. Code
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
OS-Exempt
01-Operational'
01-Tank
DISTILLATION UNIT TO RECYCLE SPENT FREON 113 GENERATED FROM SHIP SYSTEM FLUSHING
SEC I, C : NOT REGULATED UNDER RCRA RECYCLING UNIT
PAD003025418 BMY-COMBAT SYSTEMS, A DIVISION
Source Code : A69-Remediation Derived .
Form Code ' : BlOI-lnorganic Liquid
Waste Description : CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
Conments :
CAS Numbers :
BAIR SIDING
18 3795 2-On-site cleanup 2-After mix of HW
0.0 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Overs I g.
DATE : 11/16/94
CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 19
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
.Generated
Radio-
active
TRI Constituent : 2-No TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty) : H083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt/15,996.7
Waste Codes : 0039 0040
PS Page System
1
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
H021-Solvents Recovery 12.1 / 12.1
Sec.lll-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
12.1 / 12.1
Future Avail. Code
0.0./ 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (To.tal/RCRA)
3.3 / 3.3
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tenk /
Description : DISTILLATION OF SCRAP THINNERS FROM SPRAY PAINTING OPERATIONS
Comment : DER ADDED FORK. SYSTEM IS A MOBILE COMMERCIAL VENDOR.
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 38,949.5 / 12,853.3 . 109,591.3 / 36,165.1 38,949.5 / 0.0
Sec.Ill-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
503.0 / 503.0
109,591.3 / 76,713.9
1992
1
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NEXAVALENT CHROMIUM REDUCTION AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION OF D007 WASTEWATER IN TANKS AND ASSOCIATED ACIDIC RINSES.
Comment : . III-A. NEW EVAPORATION/CRYSTALIZATION ZERO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT WILL START UP IN 1992.
M083-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 15,996.7 / 15,996.7
Sec.III-A. New Hax. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
109,591.3 / 0.0
1992
30,442.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
1
15,996.7 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
0.4 / 0.4
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES -
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 10-Tank
Description : ON-SITE STRIPPING OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER.
Conrnent : SEC. III-A. ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM WILL BE STARTED UP SOMETIME IN 1992. CAPACITY OF 50 GPM.
PAD004341269 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY
Source Code : A03-Cleaning & Degreasing
WILMERDING
14 3743 1-On-site activity 1-Befor* (nix
1.3 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight • CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 20
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility CM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
ID Name City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
Form Code '
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Ons ite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
B109- Inorganic Liquid
SPENT CAUSTIC SOLUTION FROM PARTS CLEANING PROCESS CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS FOR CORROSIVITY.
1-No TRI Report
M121-0ther Trtmt/1.3
D002
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
1 M121-0ther Trtmt 1.3/1.3 1.5/1.5 1.5/0.0 0.0/0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
03-POTW
01-Operational • ,
01-Tank
: NEUTRALIZATION OF CAUSTIC WASTEWATER IN TREATMENT TANKS.
PAD0050330S5 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
ERIE
15 3743 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
297,114.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surface Prep and Finish
BIOS-Inorganic Liquid
ACIDIC WASTE WATER FROM ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHING OPERATIONS
SEC. IV, BOX 2-WASTE WATER GENERATED RELATIVELY PROPORTIONALTO PRODUCTION VOLUME
1-No TRI Report
H071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/297,114.0
D002
-------
BRS 91 Oversight GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 21
File : 1N11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating 1CRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GH
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
PAD005033055 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
ERIE
16 3743 1-On-site activity 1-Before mix
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
A22-Surfaee Prep and Finish
B107-Inorganic Liquid
CYANIDE WASTE WATER FROM ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHING OPERATIONS
SEC. IV. BOX 2-WASTE WATER GENERATION RELATIVELY PROPORTIONAL TO PRODUCTION VOLUME
1-No TRI Report
M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/38,781.0
D003
38,781.0 2-No
PS Page System
1 M072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
442.239.0 / 38,781.0 1,969.240.8 / 438,350.4 452,239.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code' X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Residual (Total/RCRA)
175.5 / 20.3
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Description 1 CYANIDE BEARING WASTE WATER FROM HEAT TREATING AND ELECTROPLATING ARE TREATED BY ALKALINE CHLRINATION FOLLOWED BY LIME
NEUTRALIZATION FOR METALS PRECIPITATION
Comment :
M071-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 442,239.0 / 297,114.0 1,969,240.8 / 1,530,890.4 442,239.0 / 0.0
"Sec.III-A. Nev Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
175.5 / 155.2
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment •
02-NPDES
01-Operational
ACIDIcNttSTE WATERS ARE TREATED BY CHROMATE REDUCTION FOLLOWED BY NEUTRALIZATION WITH LIME FOR METALS PREC1PITAION
TND051386506 TOUCHSTONE, INC.
JACKSON
31 3743 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
0.0 8-Unknown
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - CM & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/91 Page 22
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating (CRT Wastes
Facility Facility CM Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
ID Name City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Ons itc Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
.
-
8 -Unknown
M137-Disposal/0.3
0002
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
TXD026481523 GATX TERMINALS COROPORATION GALENA PARK 1 4226 > 1-On-site activity 8 -Unknown 227,379.1 2-Ho
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A75-Poll Ctrl or Waste Trtmt ' ,
8205-OrganIc Liquid
STORMWATER, CONTAMINATED
8-Unknown
H081- Aqueous Organic Trtmt/226,643.7
D001 D002 D003 D004 D005 D006 0007 0008 D009 D010 001 1 D012 D013 D014 DOlS D016 D017 DOld D019 D020 0021 D022 0023 D024
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
TXD981046345 GROENDYKE TRANSPORT, INC. TEXAS CITY
Source Code : A19-Cleaning ft Degreasing
form Code : 8101-Inorganic Liquid
1 4231 1-On-site activity 8-Unknown
123.9 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversk
DATE : 11/16/91.
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
GH ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
Page 23
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name
Waste Description .
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Ons ite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
GH Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
TANK TRUCK DRAININGS & FLUSHINGS
8-Unknown
M134-Disposal/123.9
D001
PS Page System
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
Residual (Total/RCRA)
VADOO1307495 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING
NEWPORT NEWS
1 3731 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW
11,700.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
' Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Oty)
Waste Codes
: A49-Other than Surface Prep and Finish
: B114-Inorganic Liquid
: ION-EXCHANGE RESIN REGENERATION WASTEWATER; ACIDIC AND BASIC
: SECTION I.F. -ION-EXCHANGE RESIN REGENERATION .
•
: 2-No TRI Constituent
: H121-0ther Trtmt/11,700.0
: D002
VAD001307495 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING
NEWPORT NEWS
2 3731 1-On-site activity «-After mix of HW & non-HW
6,360.0 2-No
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
: A22-Surface Prep and Finish
: B103-Inorganic Liquid
: INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS CONTAINING HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM AND OTHER METALS
: SECTION I.K. -CHROMIUM, LEAD, SILVER, NICKEL, COPPER AND ZINCOMPOUNDS
•
: 3-TRI Constituent(s)
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - GH ft PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 24
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility GH
ID Name City Page
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : H071- Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/6,360.0
Waste Codes : 0002 D007 D008 0011
VAD001307495 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING NEWPORT NEWS 4
Source Code
Form Code
Waste Description
Comments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
A03-Cleaning ft Degreasing i
8106- Inorganic Liquid
CAUSTIC INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS CONTAINING METALS
SECTION I.K. -CR, PB, NI, CU, AND ZN COMPOUNDS
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/5, 860.0
0002 D007 D008 0011
PS Page System Influent (Total/RCRA) Max. Oper.
1 H071- Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 6,360.0 / 6,360.0 87,600.0 /
Sec. Ill -A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail.
Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
SIC Code . Point of Measurement Generated active
3731 1-On-slte activity 4-After mix of HW ft non-HU 5,860.0 2-No
(Total/RCRA) Effluent (Total/RCRA) Residual (Total/RCRA)
87,600.0 10,084.0 / 0.0 24.9 / 24.9
Code X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
03-POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank
CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS CONTAINING
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM AND OTHER METALS
H072-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 1,945.0 / 1,945.0 87,600.0 / 87,600.0 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future'Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
03-POTW
01-Operational
01-Tank
CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS CONTAINING CANIDES AND OTHER METALS
7.6 / 7.6
-------
BRS 91 Oversi GH & PS Forms (As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/V-. Page 25
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility Facility
ID Name City
3 M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 5,860.0 / 5,860.0
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
CM
Page SIC
87,600.0 / 87,600.0
Future Avail. Code X
Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
Code Point of Measurement Generated active
9,298.0 / 0.0
Future Capacity
23.0 / 23.0
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
03-POTU
01-Operational
01-Tank
CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF CAUSTIC INDUSTRIAL UASTEUATERS CONTAINING METALS
Conment
4 M121-Other Trtmt 11,700.0/11,700.0 0.0/0.0 : 11,700.0/0.0 , 0.0/0.0.
Sec.lII-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900 ,
Regulatory Status : 02-NPDES
Operational Status : 01-Operatlonal •
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION OF ION-EXCHANGE'RESIN REGENERATIONUASTEUATER; ACIDIC AND BASIC
Comment :
5 M021-Solvents Recovery 34.2/34.2 0.0/0.0 23.6/0.0 21.8/21.8
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change . Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N 0.0 / 0.0 1900 .
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt . ' •
Operational Status :
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : NON-HALOGENATED PAINT SOLVENT RECOVERY BY BATCH DISTILLATION
Conment • : SEC. I.D. -MOBILE SYSTEM OWNED BY FIRST SOURCE, INC. .
VAD046960449 BABCOCK ft WILCOX NNFD LYNCHBURG 29 443 1-On-site activity 2-After mix of HW 6,045.5 2-No
Source Code : A26-Surface Prep and Finish
Form Code : B103-Inorganic Liquid
Waste Description . : SPENT CORROSIVE PICKLE ACID, MIXTURE OF NITRIC AND HYDROFLUORI ACIDS
Consents : I, K. CHROMIUM, COBALT, COPPER, MANTANESE, & NICKEL COMPOUNDS II, D.. NEUTRALIZATION AND CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION.
CAS Numbers : 07664-39-3 07697-37-2
-------
BRS 91 Oversight
DATE : 11/16/94
CM & PS Forms (As of
Page 26
File : IN11RUH1.RPT '
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
10
Facility
Name
City
GM
Page
SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated
Radio-
active
TRI Constituent : 3-TRt Constltuent(s)
Onsite Info (System/Qty) : M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt/6,045.5
Waste Codes : D002
PS Page System
1
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
H021-Solvents Recovery 21.4 / 21.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
187.2 / 187.2
Future Avail. Code
7.1 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
OS-Exempt
03-Permanently Closed
01-Tank
DISTILLATION OF RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED FERON 113/
DICHLOROMETHANE FOR REUSE
M021-Solvents Recovery 31.5 / 31.5
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
1,912.6 / 1,912.6
Future Avail. Code
26.2 / 26.2
X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : OS-Exempt
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 01-Tank
Description : DISTILLATION OF RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED
Comment :
M(M-Metals Recovery 0.0 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
TRICHLOROETHYLENE FOR REUSE
0.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
OS-Exempt
01-Operational
02-Container 10-Tank
REMOVAL OF SILVER FROM X-RAY AND OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC
I, B. I ON EXCHANGE & ELECTROPLATING
DEVELOPING OPERATIONS* WASTEWATER.
I, F. ELECTROPLATING APPARATUS
M082-Aqueous Organic Trtmt 11.0/11.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
11.0 / 0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Tptal/RCRA)
1.5 / 1.5
5.3 / 5.3
1.4 / 1.4
1.7 / 1.7
-------
BRS 91 Overs u GH & PS Forms (As of
DATE : 11/16/94 Page 27
Hie : IN11RUN1.RPT
Facility Facility
ID Name
11/94)
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating I CRT Wastes
GH Origin 1991 Tons Radio-
City Page SIC Code Point of Measurement Generated active
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
08-Exempt
01-Operational
02-Contafner
ADSORPTION OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE FROM MONITORING WELL
PURGE WATER
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 40,532.5 / 40,532.5 225,187.7 / 225,187.7 54,211.8 / 0.0
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
382.2 / 382.2
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
.02-NPDES
01-Operational
01-Tank
PICKLE ACID NEUTRALIZATION AND TREATMENT
II, D. CURRENTLY CONTESTING RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 33,584.4 / 12,204.3
Sec.HI-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
DESIGNATION WITH STATE OF VIRGINIA
98,665.6 / 98,665.6 110,925.8 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
302.4 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Conment
02-NPDES
01-Operational
01-Tank
RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED ACID TREATMENT
M077-Aqueous Inorganic Trtmt 2,308.4 / 2,308.4
Sec.III-A. New Max. Oper. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
6,668.1 / 6,668.1
8,168.5 / 0.0
160.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code X Future Capacity
N
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status
Operational Status
Unit Type
Description
Comment
OS-Exempt
01-Operational
01-Tank
CONVERSION OF COPPER NITRATE TO COPPER OXIDE FOR RESALE
VAD981036718 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING NEWPORT NEWS
Source Code : A24-Surface Prep and Finish
1 3731 1-On-site activity 3-After mix with non-HW
60.7 2-No
-------
BRS 91 Oversight - GM & PS Forms {As of 11/94)
DATE : 11/16/94 - Page 28
File : IN11RUN1.RPT
BRS Data for "Transportation Equipment Cleaning" Industry
Top 25 Facilities Generating ICRT Wastes
Facility
ID
Facility
Name
City
GN
Page SIC
Origin
Code
Point of Measurement
1991 Tons
Generated'
Radio-
active
Form Code
Waste Description
Coirments
CAS Numbers
TRI Constituent
Onsite Info (System/Qty)
Waste Codes
PS Page System
B105-Inorganic Liquid
WASTE CORROSIVE LIQUID
3-TRI Constituent(s)
M121-0ther Trtmt/60.7
D002
Influent (Total/RCRA)
Max. Open. (Total/RCRA)
Effluent (Total/RCRA)
1
M121-0ther Trtmt 60.7 / 60.7
Sec.III-A. New Max. Open. (Total/RCRA) Year of Change
' 0.0 / 0.0
Future Avail. Code
60.7/0.0
X Future Capacity
Residual (Total/RCRA)
0.0 / 0.0
0.0 / 0.0
1900
Regulatory Status : 03-POTW
Operational Status : 01-Operational
Unit Type : 0' Tank
Description : ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION OF SHEET METAL SURFACE PREPARATIONWASTEWATER; ACIDIC.
Comment :
-------
ATTACHMENT 17-3
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING INDUSTRY
-------
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
17-3-1
TELEPHONE LOG
Continental Grain
Atchison, KS
9/28/94 and 9/30/94
Jerry Caylor
Administrator
913-367-1635
Gillian Foster, Alex Turchi
This facility cleans tanks that have contained propane gas and food grade products. The
propane gas is flared off under a permit with the state of Kansas before, cleaning. Tanks that
have contained food products such as flour, sugar, or soy bean oil are cleaned using hot water
under high pressure and possibly a nonhazardous biodegradable degreaser called "Awesome". The
wastewater is not considered ignitable, corrosive, or reactive, or exhibits organic "toxicity
characteristics."
Wastewater falls into a collection pit where it awaits shipment, by vacuum truck, to the
local POTW. The facility has an informal agreement with the POTW to receive its wastewaters.
The wastewaters are not aggregated with any other wastes.
The facility generates approximately 30,000 to 40,000 gallons of wastewater per year.
During a typical year, the facility cleans between 50 and 60 tank cars.
-------
17-3-2
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Dulles International Airport
Fairfax, VA
DATE: 9/30/94 and 10/3/94
CONTACT NAME: Bryan Leuck
General Engineer/Government Programs
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 703-661-2800
ICF CONTACT NAME: Gillian Foster
Dulles, like most other airports, uses two types of anti-icing and de-icing solutions: Type I
and Type II. Type I is a liquid solution that is sprayed on aircraft exteriors and airport
pavements in order to melt ice and prevent icing. Type n is a gelatinous mixture that is applied
directly to the aircraft exterior and wings. It is the consistency of Naval Jelly. Both solutions are
a 50/50 mixture of water and ethylene glycol or propylene glyeol. The facility representative
believes that ethylene glycol is a CERCLA-regulated hazardous substance. Neither solution is
considered ignitable, corrosive, or reactive, or exhibiting an organic "toxicity characteristic." The
facility representative reported that some airports use potassium acetate on airport pavement.
Dulles uses approximately 120,000 gallons of pure ethylene glycol or propylene glycol
annually. It is only used in the winter months, therefore the entire amount enters into the .
wastewater stream during 3 or 4 months.
The wastewater containing ethylene glycol and propylene glycol is washed away with
stormwater and is routed into unlined open ditches that goes into a stream system. This stream
system empties into a stormwater containment impoundment. Biodegradation takes place in the
streams and containment impoundment. The airports stormwater is eventually released to larger
streams that feed into the Potomac River.
Dulles has applied for a Virginia state NPDES permit. The permit has not yet been
approved. At this time Dulles has no discharge limitations. However it does test the outfall of
the containment impoundment for pH level, biological oxygen demand, and chemical oxygen
demand.
The facility representative reported that the Federal Aviation Administration requires that
all planes be de-iced or anti-iced during certain weather conditions. In addition, some substitutes
for ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, such as potassium acetates, may act as a conductive salt
and may affect electrical systems. Also, he pointed out, these salts may accumulate in the soil and
groundwater.
No aircraft exterior washing operations are allowed at Dulles.
-------
17-3-3
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: IBS Railcar Service Center
Cedar Rapids, LA
DATE: 9/27/94 and 9/29/94
CONTACT NAME: Wade Swindle
Special Projects Manager
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 319-398-7757
ICF CONTACT NAME: Gillian Foster, Alex Turchi
IBS primarily cleans rail tanks that have carried food products such as corn syrup,
molasses, and vegetable oils. IBS does not clean tanks that have contained hydrocarbons, or
other chemicals. Solid heels from the tanks are disposed of in the local landfill by special
authorization. Other heels, liquids or pumpable sludges, are mixed with the wastewater stream.
IES generates approximately 350,000 to 450,000 gallons of wastewater per month. The
wastewater is collected in floor drains and a floor sump. The wastewater is then pumped to one
of ten 12,000-gallon storage tanks. If needed, the pH is adjusted with liquid caustic in these
tanks. Finally, wastewaters are released to the municipal POTW that the facility holds a permit
with. The wastewater is not considered ignitable, corrosive, or reactive, or organic "toxicity
characteristics."
The facility samples its wastewaters twice a month as part of its permit with the municipal
POTW that receives the wastewaters. The permit requires the facility to monitor and adjust the
pH level, oil content, and biological oxygen demand level of the wastewaters. The POTW will
only receive wastewater with a pH of 7 and a 15 ppm or below fat or oil content.
Tank trucks that require caustic cleaning are washed using a vacuum return line that
captures the washing solution for reuse. Only the rinse solution is allowed to enter the floor
drains. Wastewaters are not aggregated with other wastes prior to disposal.
-------
17-3-4
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Kiesel Marine, St.Louis, MO
DATE: 12/8/94, latest contact
CONTACT NAME: Ron Dent
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (314) 421-0328
ICF CONTACT NAME: Manisha Shahane
This facility washes barges on the water. They wash both tank and dry-cargo barges. Ninety-nine
percent of the commodities the facility transports is food grade, including molasses, grains, and
soybean oil. Occasionally, the facility may transport caustic solutions such as sodium hydroxide.
V.
Waste Generation and Management
The treatment system used by the facility involves the following steps:
• City water is heated through the heat exchanger and then run through a
"butterworth" (a spinner type cleaner) placed in the barge to be cleaned.
• The washwater is pulled out of the cleaned barge with a vacuum truck and then it
is run through Kiesel's on-site wastewater treatment plant.
• The treatment system at the plant processes all the wastewaters and cooks out the
volatile content. The plant does not have any ponds. Only aboveground tanks are
used. The wastewater goes through an oil-water separator, a cooker, then an air-
stripping column, to a cooling tower, through a charcoal bath, and then into
another aboveground tank. The water is then removed from that tank and placed
in another tank. Water from this tank goes back into the boiler to generate steam.
1 The plant treats wastewaters other than those from cleaning barges. For example, the
plant treats wastewater from other locations where rail tanks and tank trailers are cleaned. The
waste streams are not mixed before processing.
Additional/Alternative Treatment
The facility generates some corrosive wastewater from cleaning barges that contain a
caustic solution. The hazardous wastewater is loaded in trailers and then hauled off site to
treatment, storage and disposal facilities in the area.
Waste Discharge Agreement
Wastewaters from this facility should not have any UTS constituents. Since the facility does not
discharge, the facility does not have a permit.
-------
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
ICF CONTACT NAME:
17-3-5
TELEPHONE LOG
Maryland Rail Car, Inc.
Elk Mills, MD
9/29/94 and 9/30/94
J.D. Saunder
Personnel Manager
319-398-7757
Gillian Foster
This rail car facility primarily provides general car repair services. It primarily accepts
tanks that have carried food products for cleaning. The facility does not accept listed hazardous
wastes. The representative reported that the facility is not required to have a federal or state
permit.
The facility does not recycle any wash solutions. The facility does not have floor drains or
sump pits as collectors. A tank car is cleaned and the wastewater is collected by a vacuum truck,
put through a scrubber, and collected in a holding tank called a slop tank. The slop tank is an old
rail car tank.
The facility generat.es approximately 5,000 gallons of wastewater per month. They have a
contract with a waste hauler, GPX, to remove the wastes. The wastewaters are collected in a
5,000-gallon tanker and shipped off site to the Dupont Chamber Works facility for disposal.
-------
COMPANY NAME:
DATE:
CONTACT NAME:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
j—>
ICF CONTACT NAME:
17-3-6
TELEPHONE LOG
Rivenvay Harbor Service St. Louis, Inc. in East Carondelet, Illinois
12/8/94, latest contact
Harold Bruner, Vice-President
(618)286-4571
Manisha Shahane
This facility is primarily a barge operator, however it does perform some cleaning operations. The
facility cleans the barges on water. Rivenvay cleans dry-cargo barges, such as those carrying grain
and fertilizer. The facility does not clean any liquid product barges.
Waste Generation and Management
Water from the river is pumped up with hoses and sprayed into the barge to wash out the
container. The water is then pumped out of the barge and returned to the river. There is no
treatment of the washwater. This facility does not generate wastes that would be affected by this
rule.
Waste Discharge Agreement
Since it does not discharge to a particular disposal "destination, Riverway does not have a
permit.
-------
17-3-7
TELEPHONE LOG
COMPANY NAME: Suttles Truck Leasing, Inc. in Demopolis, AL
DATE: 11/15/94, latest contact
CONTACT NAME: Clarence Bean, Manager of Safety and Environmental Compliance
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (205) 289-0670 FAX 205/289-0608
ICF CONTACT NAME: Manisha Shahane
Suttles washes out a lot of hazardous waste. About ten percent of the waste may be hazardous at
a treatment facility. Mr. Bean noted that Alabama has changed ruling on the acceptable standard
of empty. The RCRA-empty standard is no longer acceptable. ADM now says that any amount
remaining in a truck or tank is not acceptable and anything that comes into contact with the
remainder is then considered hazardous waste.
Waste Generation . '
The facility generates about 30 tons per month of nonhazardous waste. It is mostly the filtercake
from outside of the vehicle (nonhazardous resins). When the solid waste is filtered out, it goes to
hazardous landfills and is manifested in as nonhazardous. Or, it might be deepwell injected,
incinerated, or burned for fuel.
The facility generates about 20 tons per month of hazardous water and waste. This includes
mostly pumpable sludge and liquids.
The facility deals with some F039 wastes.
Approximately, one million gallons of clean water are discharged per month. In one month they
might wash 2,200 tractor trailer rigs.
The Treatment Process and Waste Management
The wastewater is pumped out of the concrete floor into an aboveground tank system (cone-
bottom). The facility will then use chemicals to flocculate the solids out. The solid wastes sink to
the bottom;they are pulled out. The water then goes to-another aboveground tank (cone-bottom)
and then runs through a filter press and de-watered.
Streams are not aggregated with other streams.
Notification of regulated waste activities is provided to the state.
The facility discharges water via SID permit to the city. All the other wastes must be segregated
from this water in order lor it to go to the city.
-------
17-3-8
If a vehicle is washed in Grayland, MI, the nonhazardous water is transported to Demopolis
where it is treated and then discharged. No hazardous materials can be moved; they must be sent
directly to landfill, etc. Only one facility is running and in compliance for disposing [of hazardous
wastes].
-------
ATTACHMENT 17-4
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
TANK AND CONTAINER INTERIOR CLEANING SCREENER (QUESTIONNAIRE
-------
~~1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Tank and Container Interior Cleaning
Sereener Questionnaire
OMB No. 2040-0166
J Ex»f*» 11/3O96
U*e Now a pencil onhr. Do not write «MV stamp, or mark page* 1-3 o* thla foon except to fIB In the appropriate ovaKej tor eech question.
the General Instruction*, Optical Scanner matructiena, and the Definition of Tarma before competing thla quaatlonnalra form. Ptaaaa aaa
burden atatamant on pa0a 2 of tha covar lattar. If you have any queettona, call the halpllna numbar at 1-000-27S-130*.
SECTION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Is ^Information printed on tha mailing labat
cuiiact?
OYes
" No (Provide corrected address information on Paga 4)
2. Idantlfy tha parson moat fcnowledgeabla of
quaatlonnalra raaponaaa on Page 4.
3. la tha facility rnd tha bualnaaa entity that owm
thla faculty ona and tha aama?
O Yaa .
O No (Previda information on Paga 4)
4. How many facllrHaa oparatad by
tha buainaaa antfly llatad In
quaatlon 3 conduct TEC
oparatlona? TEC operation*
includa cleaning tha Intarlor of
tank trucka, intarmodal tank
container*. Intarmedlata bulk
container!, rail tank care, tank
bargee, and/or tanker*.
JL)
•Z/-X JL
XXO)
CD CD CD
XXX
» » r
A • •
.» -e t
5. Does your facility perform any tranaportatton
equipment cleaning (TEC) operattona? TEC operation*
include tne following activrtlaa: cleaning the interior of
tank trucks, intenriodal tank container*. Intermediate
bulk containers (IBC'a), rail tank cars, tank bargaa,
and/or tankers.
rts
NS
IF YOU ANSWERED "NO". STOP HERE. COMPLETE
THE CERTIFICATION FORM. RETURN THIS
QUESTIONNAIRE FORM AND THE SIGNED
CERTIFICATION* FORM.
«U.S. GOVERNMENT MINTING OFFICE: im-S1S-21l
6. Doe* your faculty generate tranaportatton equipment cleaning
proceaa aiaaiawaiaf? Refer to the Deflruttoo of Term* aactton.
OYaa
~ No
IF NOTEC PROCESS WASTEWATER IS GENERATED
ATTHtS FACILITY, STOP HERE. COMPLETE THE
CERTIFICATION FORM. RETURN THE CERTIFICATION
FORM AND THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FORM.
If transportation equipment cleaning proceaa
waatawatar la generated at your facility, to where la It
discharged and/or dlapoeed? Indicate all that are
applicable. Provide the Information aaaoctatad with
eocn on Peojt 4»
O POTW (Specify name on Pag* 4)
O CTW (Specify name on Paga 4)
O FOTW (Specify name on Page 4)
Z1 Other facility (Specify on Page 4)
Z United State* Surface Waters. (Specify NPDES permit numoer below)
NPOC8 Permit Number
rmi
O O ® CD CD CD CD CD®
TXIXXXXIX
T x ft. .x T> rr .r j> rr
CC1131331
004444444
i it
7 r T
a a- T r »
H H « I t
i i • * t
j j
K K
L L
M M
N N
O O
O 0
a a
s s
T T
U U
V V
w w
X X
r T
z z
Pnmcdinu.S* :'-»c.r:td »io«'w EcoSun"
. PLEASE OO NOT WRfTE IN THIS AREA
• 1 •
3634
. mm
-------
OftaOTESTBUTC.
SECTION 2. TBANSPOHTATION EQUIPMENT CLEANING OPERATIONS
7. For
facility. If
Information at your factiKy.
MX P*MM approxlmata the number of
d for eeen type of unit cleaned at ttito
on raadUyavallaMa
Tar* Truck
i/X
X X X X
X X X CD 3)
(DCDCDCDCD
T: T T . T T
j • « r/ •.
T J. 1; £,-Tl
Tank Contalnar
x-
x x x x cr
X- X CD 9 CD
XKECBGDJBB
J A > I 1
T J.--T. J X
Bulk Contalnar
x^x^xxx
X-X-XXCE
QDCZXXXDCE
J t 1 A A
T-.TXT--XI
X* CD UD
XXX XX
xx- 76%-100%
Food Grada Products. Bavaraoaa. Animal
and vegetaoia Oil. etc.'. * •Cot*
Petroleum and Coal Products (ax. coat
gasouna: napntfia: luea. crude, and
fuel oil) ........................................... .-._..-
_ X a 6 6 f
Latex. Rubber. Resins. Plastics.
P'astiozers. etc..
Scaos and Detergents.
A a c o E '
............. A a c o E *
Hazardous Waste (as defined in 40 CFR
oart26i) ; A a c o E •
Cnemicais Not Listed m Above Categones.. A a c o c *
Omer (Please soecity on cage 4) A a c o e >
Otner (Please specify on page 41 A a c o E t
9. What typaa of cieanJng operrtona dOM your facility
perform? Indlcata all thatappfy.
* Water VVash
t Presoiw*
£ CaujocWasn
o OetergantWAsn
Jl Otriers (Pleasa
specify on page 4)
10. Far calendar yaar 1992. pleaae estimate your facllltya tota
average dally proeaaa and norvprocess wastawatar
dlKharoe, In gallona par day. If poaatMa. approxtmata baa
on raadUyavailaM* Information at your facility.
u
Par Pay '--••*
rrrrr
-T X X X X X T X
T T t T«.C I- I T
Jl i X X
XXIXIXXX
.vr-rctcp
SECTION 3. WASTEWATER TREATMENT
11. Whattypa(s)ofwM
ipoaalinathod(a)
ar treatment tachnotogy(taa) or
your facility employ to manage
from transportation equipment cleaning
oparatfomf Indicate ai that appty.
r Biological Treatment
*~ Cartoon Adaorption
O Comical Oxidation or Reduction
^ Chloflnatton
^^ Clanflcatton
OOaapWallniactlon
C Oisurvad Air Rotation
C Equalization
Evaooration Ponds
_ Filtration
Z Gravity Separation
_ Gnt Chambers
~ Hyorolysis
ion Excnange/Resin Adsorption
Non-aerated Lagoons/Ponds/Basms
Oil/Water Separator.
pH Adjustment
Racks/Screens
Recycle/Reuse
Reverse Osmosrs
Sedimentation/Settling Ponds
Solvent Extraction
Steam/Air Stripping
Otners (Please specify on page 4)
Please continue on
page 3
-------
12.
fedim/a operational structure. Indicate all that apply. For
definitions of the followtnQ, refer to the Definition of Tomw
••etton.
." Carrier
.V. Shipper
Z Independent
~ Builder/leaser
If you Indicated more than era type of facility operation
above, please estimate what percentage of your bualnes*
operations are dedicated to these activities.
-------
P.O. Bex
City
SUM
Zip Code
For Question 2, Identify the person most knowlodaMDlo of questionnaire response*:
Title
Telephone Nutnoer
Beet Tim* To Contact-
tt your ruportM to Question 3 was "No", DIMM provide:
Butlneee Entity Neme
Street Adareu/P.Q. Be*
City
State
If your tMpooM to QuMtten 6
POTWHim*:
WM "POTW, "CTW, -TOTW, or "Othor FaottHy-,
FOTWNamu:
Other Feclltty N*me:_
If your response to Question • Included "Other*, please specify the commodity or commodity group.
<2)
If your response to Question 9 Included "Others", please specify the type of cleaning operetJon(s) performed.
(D (3) .
(2) ! (4) ;
If your response to Question 11 Included "Others", please indicate the other wastewater treatment or disposal methods employed.
(3)
(2)
Please provide any comments regarding your responses to the screener questionnaire. Please cross-reference your comments by ques
PLEASE DO NOT WRtTE IN THIS AREA
3634
•4 ••
-------
INTERIOR CLEANING
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Builder/leaser* A facility that cleans as well as manufactures and/or leases tank trucks, intermodal
tank containers, intermediate bulk containers (IBC's), rail tank cars, tank barges, and/or tankers.
X
Carrier-Operated* A description for a facility that owns and operates a tank fleet used to transport
others' products and cleans the fleet used for such transport (example-for hire services).
Clean Water Act* Federal legislation enacted by Congress to * restore and maintain the chemical,
physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters* (Federal Water Pollution Control
Amendments of 1972, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
Combined Treatment Works (CTW)- Any device or system, which is privately owned, operated, and
used by multiple facilities to recycle, reclaim, or treat liquid sewage or liquid industrial wastes.
Commodity- Any chemical, material, or substance transported in a tank truck, intermediate bulk
container (IBC), intermodal tank container, ran tank car, tank barge, or tanker.
Direct Discharger* A facility that conveys untreated or facility-treated process wastewater or
nonprocess wastewater directly to surface waters of the United States, such as rivers, lakes, or
oceans. (See United States Surface Waters definition.)
Discharge* The conveyance of wastewater (1) to United States surface waters such as rivers,
lakes, and oceans or (2) to a publicly-owned, federally-owned, combined, or other treatment works.
Facility- The physical location where transportation equipment cleaning (TEC) operations are
conducted.
Federally-Owned Treatment Works (FOTW)- Any device or system owned and/or operated by a
United States Federal Agency to recycle, reclaim, or treat liquid sewage or liquid industrial wastes.
Independent- A description for a facility that does not own or operate a tank fleet, but provides
cleaning services on a commercial basis either as a primary or secondary business.
Indirect Discharger- A facility that conveys, by. pipes or conduits, or hauls wastewater to a
publicly-owned treatment works (POTW), federally-owned treatment works (FOTW). combined
treatment works (CTW), or other treatment works. Indirect dischargers may or may nor treat their
wastewater at their facility.
Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC)- A completely enclosed storage vessel used to hold liquid, solid,
or gaseous materials. Intermediate bulk containers may be loaded onto flat beds for truck or rail
transport or onto ship decks for water transport. There are no maximum or minimum values for
intermediate bulk container volumes, although larger containers are generally considered to be
intermodal tank containers. IBC's are also commonly referred to as totes or tote bins.
Intermodal Tank Container* A completely enclosed storage vessel used to hold liquid, solid, or
gaseous materials. Intermodal tank containers may be loaded onto flat beds for truck or rail
transport or onto ship decks for water transport. There are no maximum or minimum values for
intermodal tank containers, although smaller containers are generally considered to be intermediate
bulk containers. >- '
-------
NPOES Program- The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systam (NPDES1 program authorized"
by Section* 307, 3T8," 407. and 405 of the Clean Water Act that appliea to facilities that discharge
wastewater directiy to United States surface waters.
Nonprocess Wastewater. Wastewater that does not come into contact with process wastewater or
that is not generated from industrial processes. This includes, but is not limited to, wastewater
generated from restrooms, cafeterias, and showers.
Process Waitewatar- Wastewater which Is generated from or comes in contact with water
.generated from industrial activities including, but not limited to, transportation equipment cleaning,
manufacturing, rebuilding, repairing, maintenance, painting, and other industrial activities performed
at a facility.
Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTWV- Any device or system owned by a State or municipality
and used to recycle, reclaim, or treat fiquid municipal sewage or liquid industrial wastes.
Ran Tank Car- A completely enclosed storage vessel pulled by a locomotive and used to transport
liquid, solid, or gaseous materials over railway access lines. A rail tank car storage vessel may
have one or more storage compartments. There are no maximum or minimum vessel or tank
volumes.
Shipper-Operated- A description for a facility that transports their own products and cleans the
fleet used for such transport.
Tanker- A self-propelled vessel constructed or adapted primarily to carry commodities in bulk in .
cargo spaces (or tanks) through rivers, oceans, and seas. There are no maximum or minimum
vessel or tank volumes. .
Tank Barge- A non-self-propelled vessel constructed or adapted primarily to carry commodities in
bulk in cargo spaces (or tanks) through rivers, oceans, and seas. There are no maximum or
minimum vessel or tank volumes. -
Tank Truck- A motor-driven vehicle with a completely enclosed storage vessel used to transport
liquid, solid or gaseous material over roads and highways. A tank .truck may have one or more
storage compartments. There are no maximum or minimum vessel or tank volumes.
Transportation Equipment Cleaning (TEC) Operations- Activities including cleaning the interior of
tank trucks, intermodal tank containers, intermediate bulk containers (IBCs), rail tank cars, tank
barges, and/or tankers.
Transportation Equipment Cleaning (TEC) Process Wastewater- Any wastewater generated from
TEC operations which may contain cleaning solutions and traces of commodities last contained in
the tank truck, intermodal tank container, intermediate bulk container (IBC), rail tank car. tank
barge, and/or tanker. .
Unh> A single tank or container used to transport commodities.
United States Surface Waters- Waters including, but not limited to, oceans and all interstate and
intrastate lakes, rivers, streams, mudflats, sand flats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet
meadows, playa lakes, and natural ponds.
-------
ATTACHMENT 17-5
SUMMARY OF DATA OBTAINED FROM THE
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
TANK AND CONTAINER INTERIOR CLEANING SCREENER QUESTIONNAIRE
-------
17-5-1
EXHIBIT 17-5-1
NUMBER OF FACILITIES USING EACH WASTEWATER
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Wastewater Treatment
Technology
No Treatment
Biological Treatment
Carbon Adsorption
Chemical Oxidation or
Reduction
Chlorination
ClariScation
Coagulation
Deep Well Injection
Dissolved Air Flotation
Equalization
Evaporation Ponds
Filtration
Gravity Separation
Grit Chambers
Hydrolysis
Ion Exchange/Resin
Adsorption
Non-aerated
Lagoons/Ponds/Basins
Oil/Water Separator
pH Adjustment
Racks/Screens
Recycle/Reuse
Reverse Osmosis
Sedimentation/Settling Ponds
Number
of
Facilities
122
109
48
44
21
122
95
29
75
136
22
150
280
66
2
1
29
322
374
45
135
7
49
Evaporation
Pond
Facilities8
0
6
1
0
1
5
3
1
3
0
22
4
7
0
0
0
• 5
7
6
1
6
0
7
Non-aerated
Lagoons,
Ponds, Basins
Facilities8
o
12
0
4
2
1!
7
0
2
9
5
6
12
4
0
0
29
14
19
6
1.0
0
12
Sedimentation/
Settling Pond
Facilities8
2
14
2
1
3
10
7
4
6
8
7
13
20
1
0
0
12
21
27
5
12
0
49
-------
17-5-2
EXHIBIT 17-5-1
NUMBER OF FACILITIES USING EACH WASTEWATER
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY (continued)
Wastewater Treatment
Technology
Solvent Extraction
Steam/Air Stripping
Others
Number
of
Facilities
4
35
35
Evaporation
Pond
Facilities3
0
0
2
Non-aerated
Lagoons,
Ponds, Basins
Facilities3
0
1
51
Sedimentation/
Settling Pond
Facilities3
0
2
0
a Facilities which use a combination of the three potentially land-based treatment technologies have been included in
the counts for all applicable columns.
EXHIBIT 17-5-2
DAILY AVERAGE DISCHARGE OF ALL FACILITIES THAT
DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
Number of Reporting Facilities
707
Average daily process and non-process
wastewater discharge, (gallons)
10,366,609,180
-------
17-5-3
EXHIBIT 17-5-3
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE DESTINATION"
Discharge Destination
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
Combined Treatment Works (CTW)
Federally Owned Treatment Works (FOTW)
Other Facility
United States Surface Waters
Total Facilities
452
187
83
74
105
Facilities which discharge to more than one destination have been included in the count for all applicable rows.
EXHIBIT 17-5-4
NUMBER OF FACILITIES USING EACH TYPE OF CLEANING OPERATION3
Cleaning Operation
Water Washes
Presolve Cleaning
Caustic Washes
Detergent Wash
Other
Petrosolve/Diesel
Acid Washes
Steam Cleaning
Total Facilities
679
130
316
371
37
23
13
149
Facilities which use more than one of these cleaning operations have been included in the counts for all applicable
rows.
-------
17-5-4
EXHIBIT 17-5-5
NUMBER OF FACILITIES CLEANING EACH TYPE OF PRODUCT8
Commodity Group
Food Grade Products
Petroleum and Coal Products
Latex, Rubber, Resins, etc.
Soaps and Detergents
Hazardous Waste
Chemicals Not Listed
Other 1
Other 2
Acid/Base
Total Facilities
396
450
334
321
153
311
46
5
16
Facilities which transport more than one commodity group have been included in the count for all applicable rows.
EXHIBIT 17-5-6
SUM OF NUMBER OF TANKS CLEANED FOR EACH TANK TYPE
Tank Type
Tank Truck
Intermediate Bulk Container
Intermodal Tank Container
Rail Tank Car
Tank Barge
Ocean/Sea Tanker
Number of Tanks Cleaned
1,351,847
30,752
32,424
161,489
14,006
899
-------
APPENDIX B
DATA ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
-------
APPENDIX B
This appendix presents a summary of the Office of Water's Waste Treatment
Industry Questionnaire and data extracted from the 1991 Biennial Reporting System on
wastewater treatment.
-------
UtffTED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
Memorandum
To: Benjie Carroll (OS-321W)
OFFCCOF
WATER
From: Debra DiCianna
Engineering and Analysis Division (WH-552)
Date: AprO 30,1 993
Subject: Treatment Capacity Information from Waste Treatment industry Project
Attached is the information you requested regarding available treatment capacity at
Centralized Waste Treatment facilities^ This information was collected in the 1991
Waste Treatment Industry Questionnaire by the Office of Water and represents 1989
data. Names and addresses of facilities are also listed.
All of the facilities included have received a final or interim RCRA Permit. None of the
information provided pertains to waste which is underground injected. Some facilities
did not supply the capacity information requested due to complex operations.
Therefore, two totals are presented. One total represents the actual values reported.
The second total is scaled-up to included facilities which did not submit data. Below
are listed the overall totals:
1989 Reported Capacity Total: 9,669,611,960 gals/year
1989 Scaled-Up Capacity Total: 11.341,084,753 gals/year
( = Reported Capacity Total + 11 x Average Capacity)
If yqu wish to obtain any additional information or have any questions, please contact
me at (202) 260-7141.
cc: Tudor Davies (WH-551)
Ramona Trovato (WH-550G)
Woody Forsht (WH-552)
Bruce Kobelski (WH-550G)
Pritvtti on flacycfcrf Paoor
-------
FACILITY OWCtrv FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE (4/10JB3)
nlnC
VLTERWTCENERGUCBOURCESMC
WEHQANCHEMCALa REFNN3CO
WEnCAN WASTE OlOGRP
PPRGPRtATETEaraUDGTESIMC
EAMEROLCONC
aPAREhMFCMUe^TALOFVJBQNAtlC.
JOGN3CO- AUBURN
JRUNSWCKOORP
JHJSHWEUMANNC
:E008MTERNMGNAL
leOOSMERWTCNALNC
£CO8 THEA1MENT CORP.
:HEMCLEARfC
:HEM-TECHSYSTByB
MEMKftL KMNftQEMBW tJC
:HEMCAL PROCESSORS WC
:*EMCAL PROCESSORS NC
IHEUCAL PROCESSORS NC
JfivlCM. WASTE MWAQaeiTCF tCW ^RSEY
>tMCAL WASTE MANAOaeNTCF NEW VORK
XARKPROCESSWaWG,
3LEANHARBORS
XEANHAflBORSNG.
XWOCONCPCNCAOTY
PCHBWOLS
PCHBMGALSNC
FOBACALSNC
JW6W&CVEHTONN3
7C6BirANDCVBnGNMCPUNT2
7f/NOiei
XJPOCEI06tejOUR3.CHA*CERWGRK3
3VNHXLNC
3JWWCSOLOO
u my & oo TTPPGOWOE ucs
3upwrc;.D^pAflK
3IH±I
Z9S6WALBB4DR
BSHEFFiaDST.
4141 YOST RD
700MAXWB1RD
B087t£NZJAVE
AnHWWGBTRQIO
raoiS1H6T&W.M3BMO
OOONDU8TWALAVE
OUTHPORTAQERfVWRD
>.QBCK 540 LP.O.
OraGPRNQGRCVEAVE
ibHuL&HCKAD
1000 8 STONY ISLAND AVE
BOO EAST2tfTH STREET
MOEA3TEPNPAPKWAY
r348.UJClEST.
TEB91
701 ALEXAftBRAVE.
IODU3TEHAVE
136BMMERRD.
D03.WESTENDAVE
900 BROADWAY
810RUBSELLST.
IOOOS.PME
M400ZW1S9QWAY
\PBQRST
mmSSOLnHNXJTRPK
IS10W17IHST
!02457VTHAVE&
12381 SCHSffEflHWY
%U1E130
£20 GEORGIA
DOS ROUGE
leCOULYflD,
rTSBBATTLECnOLtOPD.
OTY
"tlGUSTA
(VATEF6URY
B1EVILLE
CHULA VISTA
COGWN3
PRNCEGBQRGE
AUBURN
LMXXN
IMORE
lAQARAFAUfi
WCNUm
3RETOL
MCAQO
£BANGE1E9
:ARMNGDA1£
5EATTIE
BGMTIE
FACOMA
CWARK !
rCOELOTY
JAYTDN
IfVEtAM)
W.TMORE
"CNCAOTY
JNRNQTY
TVUAfVM
5LMTER
JCNQ BEACH
CENT
DETHOT
3E9VM1ER
JblHUII
3E1ROTT
•AFAYETTE
3EERPARK
iTATE
3A
CT
1
*
L
'A
VA
C
«
«
«
TT
1
*
IY -
VA
VA
VA
il
W
n
H
jn
x
^
il
5C
3V
W
«
il
A
a
H
[X
ZP
30004
DC3D4
«11I
B011
BCBZS
9875
B001
B8CM
«3416
4304
0232
30010
10517
ODES
11736
18103
BIOS
B42t
17100
14107
6427
M11S
11230
r4OB
M887
W077
anso
»13
XXXK
M227
3B023
10211
«217
17902
r«UD
W>. CAPACITY
EMU
1^^001/000
2,975.003
W40.030
BJB42^00
14ffX)jOOO
aoojooo
371^36^000
249^92
•
»
23,400.000
62500.000
30.000JOOO
•
7400.000
13.142JOOO
•
17X01200
* *?«WfyYX)
21XC4jOOO
6,500.003
G9AA009
44.100JOOO
72DjQOOyOQO
StjBOOjOOO
64.000.000
45^01,100
2,340000
20,79.000
80JBGCLOOO
14^00X00.000
98J320LOOO
21.000.000
*
310/411^00
AUSEDdflOS)
20XE
79
00
10
20
70
42.43
3
12
6.02
47
44
40.42
40.SO
23
73
08
65
12
92
74
• 90
61
100
0.5121
34
70
49.64
80
35.01
WT.AVAtWDE
KWJ
1,4901300,500
480.750
12*9,000
7J82JSO
11200X00
117X00
214.122JBOO
236.072
20332,000
80,737,000
1BXBOXXD
4,300.000
7j»30LO(M
10.102.113
40/471200
6.670.490
B1O.OCD
"080JDDO
AA^O^yOQQ
57jOOOjOOO
1510X100
&400,000
17.704.740
0
20.045.729
20£7D£00
3212X00X00
10290.702
44309.000
XBfasjaaa
StatoakptatBl hcoporatec esthBBan.
-------
FAOUTY CAPACITY FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE (4/1««3|
STREET
m.
STATE 3t»
MX. OPACITY
USED(1BS3>
GWL)
QflU
NCVOEflEXASNGi
EooupRwmncK)
XRPUBCHR3T1 IX
HTbUGRP
120,900,000
29.S5
64358C8fTTWLAVE
VWVEY
D42B
B4jB82jao
SWHttCOflP
*EOCENTTW.AVES£
N
14707
10.tCD.Z30
raw
HIEOCRPGRMTGN
63JDB2JDO
43.80
3.516348
HQMASTGN
53^00.000
JMFTTECOnPOWlCN
flOOPBtCVLVANIAAVE
fCRK
7404
JMFO*eiTAL WASTC CXMRaNC
7140 PRINCETON AV
30000,000
.29.81
79
»SjBOBJ54a
37J5S1JB3D
00,000.000
3D
42JDOO.OOO
IXBM
BVUEY
V
«Moe
IWRWKX
750.400
13.81
840,770
EBBS
BADjDOO
eHSHPSBMCE
QOCHiMBASMOT
5ANRWCBCO ^
M107
3.480,000
3HA8E BWTONyGNTAL
NC
gQOBIVBTSCEDRtVE
UNTNOTCN
IW
9720
7,900.000
2.100.000
[rmXNTMBflALTBMNUSCD
7635
IODjODO.000
17
JOOWBSTFIBDAVE
VATeUCO
0701
83.000.00C
MYTAGGO
I18THAVE.E.8THST.N
CWTGN
OBD8
ETFORKXVBWSY3TBYB
390,000,000
J8
73
lS.Oa8jBD3
-OORQGEflACE
5113
ALLS&MCENC.
JUUQERSMnHIWP.
1M30.000
501D
74^00250
J»
Sfl.7
tOS^OOLOOC
/BLLSBWICE MR YUKON PIT.
AJHDN
OWSNDUSmESNC
CISSOBOmJEAVE
csANoaes
164.000,000
44
._!£»£?!
32.128.712
01^40.003
TOC8
477.781.120
45.09
5DO AIRPORT WAY 8.
SEATTLE
VA
18134
LrftuCEdSCO
reSAiBAST.
O8ANOSJES
35^40,000
loose
BCONOCTPORATCD
XOJ^PA
Jfi4»
JS?.24
80.83
282366.104
13.457,864
m
383,144
"EAPL HBR NAVY PUBLIC WCRKSCTO
^AVALSTATIONAREA
>EARL HARBOR
B880
>D«ADISPOa«.00-POTT8TCWN
C3408CUTHPGRTRD.
POSTAYtCRWAY
AOGMA
so.ooo.ooc
VA
O421
^ST HARTFORD
1S.793.00C
aOOCARMANOT.
18108
4J
0105
KMCCHBIOORP
OB1BAYRD
: PALO ALTO
M3D3
4.9B3.377
5tfl63K3U8TffESOCRPORATICN
S3036THAVEN.
16007
5401,000,000
48.75
11
.25.«
_z»
33'
2S.fl25.0CO
14.017:500
__ 1^12578,498
2.043,185
nLVB^TEEWICEOONC
081 BBRRYESSARD
JAN JOSE
B51CMCEPD.
VWTAFESPHNGS
16133.
UB70
21,350,000
59:77
3B7.lea.OO(
6589.105
IBORONKHa
OTOOSWKAflLBRALNDa
jR
nan
407.7aB.t13
1357
353,674^31
EASTKVNPO
ONOBPORT
IN
BOB
6.710227
80
1/XS227
OJ8TON
rx
7087
iftownooHPig
MSHVR1E
m
ZfKDfKQ
57013
W.712.030
JNIGNCWBOE AGR PnCDOOMC
^TE.25
NSTTTUre
w
5112
2,102^)0003
_i£
_ I
~57
_. Blgg.UBQ
O33.fl8D.Oa
-------
FACILITY CAPACITY FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE (4/1903)
WE
... . .
JMTHO OIL flECCVBTrtNC.
is pouimoN CONTROL we
WffW*€NfTAL VVASTE RE80URCE3. NC.
COTTAGE BMROMMBflAL SERVICES NC
ssancHoioo
WASTE OONVmslCN WC
JTOEET
>
38GRACEYAVE
iM.E.US2BI&1M.N.OK15
30 FREIGHT ST
raoiWMonros
B65 TRANSPORT RD
BBBSAM33TCTJEDR
•
CITY '
4&IDRI
VAWOKA
VATOTURY
rcwwous
XEvawo
UTF10D
/
STATE
CT
a<
^
M
3H
>A
Z5P
3MS)
73600
36702
10231
M115
I9440
mW.CAPAOTY
PAU
13,140,000
SjOOO.000
30335.660
2B9J290.00D
68,300,000
xjsesfer
IO1AL
^VBWXVAUUEB:
337^)68,364
JCAIEUP TOTALS
* USED (10861
SO
50
78
ao.oe
-------
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS DATA FROM THE 1991 BIENNIAL REPORTING SYSTEM
EPA ID NUMBER
CADOS0806850
CAD059494310
CAT080033681
CTD000844399
CTD001 184894
CTD072138969
CTD990672081
U0000666206
ILD0644 18353
IND006050967
1ND093219012
MDD980555189
MND981 098478
NC0121700777
NE0043534635
NJD002141950 .
NJD00238S730
NJD0892 16790
NVD980895338
NYD000691949
NYD080336241
OHD0007241S3
OHD004178612
OHD087433744
OKD007233836
ORD009020231
ORD98072S592
PAD0101S404S
PAD059087072
PAD085690592
RID980906986
TN0003376928
UA004 13371 30
UVD004325353
WVD076826015
A
INF QUANTITY
GAL
FROM BRS DATA
1,106,843
2,281,976
4,762,512
360,768,560
574,131
11,185,574
60,067,991
16,231,493
1,793,987
2,772,124,412
53,475,694
1,662,231
4,597,350
1,901,489
6,678,629
655,428
10,347,456,240
48,923,122
641,903
11,222,398
25,079,632
29,714,577
16,642,080
0
570,943,381
185,493,828
39,115,200
17,186.856
26,770,000
1,483,895
1,416,960
7,835,470.800
282,837,630
1.743,953.866
223,468,565
B
MAX OPP CAP
GAL
FROM BRS DATA
13,250,000
27,000,000
1,207.824.000
2.283.660,000
1,370,500
28,632,648
777,777,310
30,398,036
6,240,000
50,677,025
150,804,016
50,360,000
8,417,487
7,008,000
53,191,794
4,000,000
14,064,054,720
163,112,860
5,057,200
0
240,920.000
75,000,000
98,160,000
0
354.285,248
728,763,458
76,867,000
27,000,000
981,120,000
434.280
3,961,224
8.400.000.000
366,313,416
2,188,298.888
93,013,402
C
MAX OPP CAP
GAL
FROM OU SURVEY
1,894,333
0
0
1,760,668,673
2,375,000
38,535,860
1,760,668,673
106,202,000
14.000.000
0
299,290,000
44,100.000
15,130,000
75,000,000
243,992
54,000,000
14,600,000,000
52,560,000
750,400
7,800,000
0
63,000,000
86,300,000
23,400,000
'•720,000,000
407,788,113
407,788,113
'30,000.000
74,200,258
35.985.587
6,000,000
8,710,227
37,193,500
2.102,000,000
0
D
LIO EFF GUAM
GAL
FROM BRS DATA
1,082,109
2.280,000
4,078,584
414,810,000
571,370
9,307,911
60,882,904
8,381,001
1,704,941
2,979,115,244
45,735,915
3,925,928
2,783,240
1,711,340
6,669,144
198.676
10.522.748,640
49,675,058
428,907
11,196,084
24,503,779
37,446,700
13,286,400
0
557,166,418
577,768,882
38,985.200
12,783.720
53.472.500
127.569.600
1,733,520
7,835,470,800
282,401,819
2, 537, UO, 000
217,813,732
E
NEW OPP
CAPACITY
FROM BRS DATA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
240,000
0
94,5(10,000
1,200,000
0
28,902,728
0
66,000,000
220,544,853
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
DIFFERENCE
IN OPP CAP
C-B
-11,355,667
. -27,000,000
-1,207,824,000
•522,991,327
1,004,500
9,903,212
982,891,363
75,603,964
7,760,000
-50,677,025
148,485,984
-6,260,000
6,712,513
67,992,000
-52,947,802
50,000,000
535,945,280
-110,552,860
-4,306,800
7,800,000
-240,920,000
-12.000.000
-11,860,000
23,400,000
365,714,752
-320,975,345
330,921,113
3,000.000
-906,919,742
35,551,307
2,038,776
•8,391,289.773
-329,119.916
-86,298,888
-93.013,402
G
AMOUNT
AVAILABLE
B-A
12,143,158
24,718,024
1,203,061,488
1,922.891,440
796.369
17.447,074
717,709,319
14,166,543
4,446,013
-2,721,447,387
97,328,322
48,697,769
3.820.137
5.106.511
46,513,165
3,344,572
3,716,598,480
114,189,738
4,415,297
-11,222,398
215,840,368
45,285.423
81,517,920
0
-216,658,133
543.269.630
37,751,800
9,813.144
954,350,000
-1,049,615
2,544,264
564,529.200
83.475,786
444,345,022
-130,455,164
TOTAL
24,707,689,233
32,566,972,513
22,835,584,729
26,444,830,066
411,387,581
-9,731,387,784
7,859,283,279
-------
APPENDIX C
TELEPHONE LOGS FOR THE
COMMERCIAL COMBUSTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Aptus
Coffeyville, Kansas
Contact Name: Rex Connor
Telephone Number. (316) 251-6380
Fax Number - (316)251-7498
Date: January 6, 1994
1CF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Connor verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Aptus, Coffeyville, Kansas, does
not contain any confidential information.
-------
JFACSITVIILE
TJEtrVN S1VEITTAJL,
XCIT
•J'Oi
L'ROIVIt
ciimjucm
Pacllttien SunraitUiiji HWTC: Surveys
n.uj>. Conner
fax:
Surun SlMfTnrU
IC3F Lucoi |Kif u
Plu inu:
3Kuociui«xl with Outu C'.'oniained i
MVk/TCI Survey nntl 1994 ETC: Update
December. 19. 1994
1 of
Is currtsnlly' writing the tvacltgrcnanU Uoouaaemm for it* cupmtrity cuvolyni* for th«
Pht»»e 1X1 IJDR. R.vOo that cover* <3echnrnctrrrlaa>U waste«vuter». cnrtmtnute
»rKuuobro>nine w»Bto«. and upent pr»eUner*. AM. in iltes pa»t Ce.B-. the Phase It
>\^ukly«Jm •Buckgroumd I>uc«m«sr>t), KT»<^ pltrna to brief profile^ o*' e«cH
onmliustion facjlllty in lt» u;lc«rouacl ctocuTiwent. TTic»«s £aeility
c.-cmtain information on euuti faculty inuluUinc the «nit typeo. w««to» accopteu, und h«»»i
releu*e rixtina*. /^Jthounh M.IEUU of tlU* Inftirxnacion l« In tl»o pulilie domoin. tne envU«
1993 t-rWTC ro»ponme» «uaU ttiet 1V94 upUuta h^ve j»erverthule«« been fcxatrmitiod on CTfil-
Tlic pwrno«e of thi» uorroapondcmcsci »• to eanflrm tno non-«;onridc.ntlali«)r t-wf
«p»cliic data element* csouuilnesU In the facility T»ro«les». Ti> tbl> end ple«*« r-eview tlie
ut«ne»«ed prufilw and confirm Oiat it duo no* contain C:BI or. if it de-ten. plea»e ixuirk tne
•specific: information th»* Bhrmld rvn tran(»d a« con£tdential. Confidential elements in the
profile will be V«l«nlced «-»ut in tne. non-CBI version of the Proposed PnASC IIT CTupticity
>Vn*Uy»i« Etaelcsrourul U»ocu merit. J>lea«e note that trt!« <• Uie •aaae procedure that -we
foUo\vcd for die JTlu>.«e 11 CJupacjty >\.nalyMi* BuclctfrountJ J?ocuuieni. Tne only additional
infarmntion in tltu Plutve TTT version tiT tne profile is a urirtetnieiii eotioernine the fHciliry'it
»nility to nccopt mpent potllncrc C'-«=-. EVCTI^A. waiiTe uode KOR8) and a oinnnrul atatement
concerning revisc:U information Murimltted in the 1'.*9y Jaxiuury 3t). 1 9i>4." Tltwntc you for youi cooperation. .
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
316 251 7498
START TIME
12-19-94 l:40PM
DURATION
1 18"
#PAGES
2/ 2
MODE
RESULTS
COMPLETED
9GOO
\OTE
No..:
PD :
TOTAL
0:01'18'
OPERATION NUMBER 48
POLLED BY REMOTE SF
SE\D TO MAILBOX PC
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STOKE & f-ORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERKOR CORRECT G2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULT I-POLLING RM
C-2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RFiCEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
Aptus, Coffeyville, Kansas
Aptus, a Westinghouse company, has both TSCA and RCRA Part B permits. The
incinerator unit is a slagging rotary kiln with a thermal input of 61.9 MMBtu/hour. This
facility can accept liquids, pumpable sludges, nonpumpable sludges, containerized solids,
"bulk solids, and soils. Liquids are directly injected into the rotary kiln and containerized
solids are ram-fed. Recycle feed and drop feed systems are used to feed bulk solids into
the incinerator unit Aptus is seeking permit modifications to ejpand the facility's
treatment and storage capacity.
Confidential capacity information provided by the facility included quantities of
waste burned in 1993 and maximum practical burning capacity. These estimates are
included in the aggregated estimate in Exhibit 2-X. This facility does accept K088
wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Aptus
Coffeyville, Kansas
Contact Name: Lee Grater
Telephone Number (316) 251-6380 x-215
Fax Number. (316) 251-7498
Date: 10/9/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Mr. Grater verbally confirmed that the facility can/will accept K088 wastes. The facility
will not perform purely inorganic disposals, therefore, if the K088 is commingled with organics the
facility would be willing to consider it for disposal.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Aptus
Tooele, Utah
Contact Name: Sharla Barber
Telephone Number: (801) 531-4291
Fax Number: (801)531-4934
Date: December 28, 1994
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Ms. Barber indicated in a voicemail message that the facility profile for Aptus, Tooele,
Utah, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
FVS.G SHVirUE
RAJV S1VX1TTAX-
RI^OORD
ICF"
•1'Ot
FRKfVt:
FHcUIUen Submitting trWTC: Survey*
Shiula Btutaer •
.Antu*. Tt»oele. Utah
Sarah Stnnord Phone:
ion tQ«iort*«-»r»tecl. EPA. Contractor for tno Ph
Captivity Aj»aly*l«
rrt
COL Issue* Assuuiated wilii Data Coauiin«»J In
FTWTC Survuy «ncl
tteu l«*»3
»r 2
. _ is currently wrJtrnB the back-ground document* for 1t» crapoctty anulyaJs -for -the
Phase III I_E>R Rule that cover* dechMrncterizea1 wnsteWraters, uarbamuto aucl
.dmixi<«-wwatcta, xind spent potllners. A* In the past Cc.fcv. the Phas* It Capacity
. _. __._ Auolcgxound Document). EP.A. plans to include brief profile* of each coaunerelnl
ooxnnustion facility in Its capucity analyius nuoltitround douuraent. Those fucility profile*
contain imormaticin o» eucli facility ixieludlnK «h» uoit types, wuatea auuepted. and hc«r
release rntinoa. AJtnuuBh some of thiv information is in the puhlic domain, the entire
^093 >rwnrC; ie»pons«». und the 1WM update have nevertlicieiui be>cn itttrtmltted «is CTB1.
The uurtiosye of this correspondencc. Is to confirm the •non-cunfideattality of
•pecillc datM elements contained in I lie facility profiles. Tn thJ» er»d please review the
nLcackied trroOlo nnd cnirtOrm thu.t it «J«..o« no* contain GUI or. U it does, please rawrk the
apceifiu Informatlun tlrnu* should be treated an confidential. ConfiUcntial elenaentH in the
profile will be t»U»«vk.«sd «»ut in the non-CBl version of the Prapoaod Phaae 1U Capuuity
.a,....yy,l- ^uMsUjtruund X^ocumexit. Pleaae note tliat this is the came proeod-ure that we
rollowed for the Phuise 11 Cnpadty Ajinlyaia 'Background 'Document. The only aUUliinrml
vnformutlon in the Pt««u»e, III version of the profile it. a statement uonccsmlriK tl-io Facility's
uriility tc-i uou»pt spent p^itllnors C<-*>- R-CK-A. wru*te code K€WH) tutd a general stuttsmcnt
concerning revised information submitted in the 1<»9* update.
Pleaae call Sa.ra.li Stafford at C"7<>3) 2.1H-2o5e» or fax response* tt» her wt
r»y January 3O, 1«S»*. Tti«aX you foe your cooperation.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
801 521 97U7
START TIME
12-19-9+ l:*2PM
DURATION
1 19"
#PAGES
2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPLETED
9600
\OTE:
:\o. : OPERATION NUMBER 48
PD : POLLED BY REMOTE SF
MB ; SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL
0:01-
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STORE & F-'ORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT C2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
Rt-CE I VE TO MEMORY
-------
Aptus, Tooele, Utah
This facility has RCRA and TSCA permits and operates one slagging rotary kiln
incinerator unit. The facility accepts liquids, pumpable sludges, containerized solids, bulk
solids, and soils. The incinerator system at this facility is a slagging rotary kiln with an
afterburner. This system has a thermal input of 140 MMBtu/hour,
This facility is equipped with several mechanisms for feeding waste into the
slagging rotary kiln. Liquids are injected directly from a storage tank into the kiln and/or
afterburner chamber. Pumpable sludges, having a viscosity lower thtn 10,000 centipoise,
are fed via a cement pump. Bulk solids and nonpumpable sludges are placed into
holding tanks. From these tanks, the wastes are moved by a clamshell to an apron
feeder where the waste is fed directly into the kiln feed chute. Containerized solids that
do not require shredding (e.g., lab packs) are fed directly into the kiln via an elevator
feed system. Containerized solids and bulk solids that require shredding are processed
through a shredder prior to being placed into storage tanks.
Confidential capacity information provided by the facility included waste quantities
burned in 1993 and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included
in the aggregated CB1 estimate in Exhibit 2-X. This facility does accept K088 wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Aptus
Toole, Utah
Contact Name: Sharla Barber
Telephone Number. (801) 531-4291
Fax Number. (801) 531-4934
Date: 10/9/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Ms. Barber verbally confirmed that the facility can/will accept K088 wastes. The facility
can perform on-site shredding. The facility will never refuse K088 wastes, however, the form of
the waste is the point of negotiation when settling on a price for disposal.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Chemical Waste Management
Contact Name: Kevin Hersey
Telephone Number. (708) 218-1900
Fax Number (708)572-1891
Date: January 5,1995
ICF Contact Name Anne Cowan
Mr. Hersey verbally confirmed that the facility profiles for Trade Waste Incineration,
Sauget, Illinois; CWM Chemical Services, Chicago, Illinois; and CWM-Port Arthur, Port Arthur,
Texas; do not contain any confidential information.
-------
TTtAN S1VLXTTAJL
RJECORD
HWTC Survoy.
I'MOMi
Sarab Stafford PI
ICF Incorporated. CP/V Contractor Tor thn
IQ 1_DR.
SUbMBCrri CBI IMUO* >taaoelated
WWTC Swwey
lo
19V3
Dote: December 19.
1 of <4
currently writlns the toncVarouruS doeuntient* -for it* eaaikelty anf«lyi>u>' ft»
Propoaed I*haae Til I_T>1% Kulri that cover* Uootutructerized wajitavwHtoVa, ciirt»%mnt«-. and
oa.«iMX»ub>-urnine -vn-1—r. und apent pcrtllnera. /Vm in tbe pact C»-»— •*»« Phaae IT Capacity
i^tnalyri* TTt-i-Vifrm'"-^ ^>ocum«mt). KPJ± pli»n« «o include brief proQlea uf CMtchi cnoimerdul
eomntiation facility in ita «JMp«itr to eonfira ttie nou-con-Hdentlnlrty ol
• *f*eelf]i= Uutu olementM nTu.*n» «r<»i»tl. OonliUtm.Ua! ol&xncnu. j*i the
profile %vill h>« tilankod out in tbe aoccCBt vmnton «jf t*M» Propoaed Plwao 111 Onpaisity
./Wnalyata •Buctc«r«*iuad Doouoaont. Pleat*** noto tlutt UUa Ja ttoo MXTT>«» prneodure Chnt we
fulUwveU for ttto P>H»a« II CVipucity S*n*\lymim Background Dovuznexat- 'Xtoe only Addtdnna]
liif c»i mailon in ttte PHojie Til •vmrmiem of the -profile i« a. «t^tgn>«r»i ennumrninH fi»«r
ahdiry
-------
Trade Waste Incineration (Chemical Waste Management) Sauget, Illinois
This RCRA Part B permitted facility operates three dry scrubber incineration
units. Two are fixed hearths and one is a rotary kiln. Each fixed hearth unit has a
maximum permitted heat release of 16 MMBtu/hour. The rotary kiln has a maximum
permitted heat release of 50 MMBtu/hour.
This facility can accept most physical forms of wastes. Liquids are blended in
tanks and transferred to atomizers for direct injection into the incinerator unit(s).
Pumpable sradges are injected into the incinerator unit(s) via a sludge lance.
Nonpumpable sludges and containerized solids are repackaged into burnable containers
and ram-fed into the incinerator units. Bulk solids are unloaded into pits and
transported -via clamshell into the rotary kiln unit
This facility submitted its survey independent of the set provided by HWTC Fen-
each imit and physical form of waste, this facility reported waste quantities "burned during
1992 and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included in the
aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit 2-X.
-------
CWM Chemical Services, Chicago, Illinois
This RCRA interim status facility is not currently operating and is awaiting EPA
authorization for TSCA and RCRA Part B permits. This facility is not included in EPA's
commercial combustion capacity estimate. The incinerator unit at this facility is a rotary
kiln with a thermal input of 30 MMBtu/hour.
The feed mechanism for the single unit at CWM consists of a drum conveyor and
ram-feed for containerized solids. In general, bulk solids and pumpible sludges are not
accepted at this facility. Nonpumpable sludges are generally accepted only when
containerized, •
This facility submitted its survey independent of the set provided by HWTC The
facility reported confidential maximum current practical burning capacity for liquids and
containerized solids. Because this facility is not currently operating, EPA did not include
it in the •pp^p'nai capacity '
Chemical Waste Management reported that expansion plans will depend on the
outcome of final permitting decisions.
-------
CWM-Port Arthur, Port Arthur, Texas
This RCRA Part B permitted facility operates a rotary kiln system that has a
thermal input of 175 MMBtu/hour. The facility has applied for a TSCA permit to burn
PCB-contaminated wastes.
This facility accepts liquids, pumpable sludges, containerized solids, and bulk
solids. Several feed mechanisms exist for feeding waste into the_rotary kiln. Positive
displacement pumps are used to feed pumpable sludges. Containerized solids are fed
into the unit -via a ram-feed system. Bulk solids are shredded and charged to the kiln by
a chute.
The facility reported waste quantities burned in 1992 and maximum practical
burning capacities as CBL These estimates are included in the aggregated CBI estimate
in Exhibit 2-X. This facility can accept K088 wastes. CWM indicated this facility
anticipated increasing operating hours by 50 percent m 1993-1994, and planned various
process improvements for the third quarter of 1993 that will improve on-line time and
allow the facility to accept CERCLA wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Chemical Waste Management
Contact Name: Mitch Hun
Telephone Number. (708)218-1737
Fax Number. (708) 572-1891
Date: 10/12/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Mr. Hun verbally confirmed that none of the CWM facilities can accept K088 wastes. He
stated that it causes slagging problems which make the process uneconomical.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: ENSCO
£1 Dorado/Arkansas
Contact Name: Byron Smith
Telephone Number. (501)863-7173
Tax Number. (501) 864-2226
Date: December 22,1994
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Gary Hodges indicated in a voicemail message that the facility profile for ENSCO, El
Dorado, Arkansas, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TTA.1-
RECORD
391O9I.13O7
TOt
FKO>t:
SUBJECT!
F«eiliti«9B Submlkliaa 11WTC Survuym
Uyron Soaiib
:~T>TSOO, El Onritrtn. A.rlrun*iui
<5O1) Sod -222o
SHC-Hti Stafford
ln«9uri*ori>lU In the 19SK3
XWl-C Surwjr and 1O94 ETC
19.
of Z
currently xwritlnn tne background document* for *t> capacity aru»lyiU» for tbe
f»hu»e III I_X3K Rule that eover* dechuractertoed wvamtewatcss*. cnrbaxnnte and
nrtfunobrominc wamte*. ftnd ttpent potlinerw. J\JL In the pavt ocuznextt), fit*^*. plena to Inulude brief prcvfllw*f each c;oiru»orcial
rmmnuation ftacIUty in lt« capacity analy«l» bnelcBrniund clocnsaen*. Tho»«s facility profile*
contain information on each tacility includins the unit type*. wa*tea accepted, and VMSMT
rntiAOft. y^nttnugh •unae of this InTormaclon U in the puoUc domain, the emire
nut ttow 19V4 update, have awarthelewt heen •wbsnio»«9 of ttO» eorrcMinanrtAnee looUnlity of
•peetSc Uut* elatTMsntB oantnined in the fucfHty profile*. To tnlw end pleaae jpevtew «n«<
Mttnehed profile end confirm chat It dcxM not euntitln CTHI nr. if It does, pleuse marlt «h«
•peelfic tnformncion tnj*.t it>K>uld be treated tt» confidential. CcmfUlenciitl element* *T» tne
profile %vll1 I-MS t>lanknu out in the non-CBI vemlor» o* the Propomsd Phtuw: 111 Capacity
>Kn»ty«ak Baekoround XMieurnemt. Plecuie note tl»ttt tnl» i» ttae »an>e proeeclure tnat •**»«
rollowved for the 1»haae It OMp*aeity /Knalyaia Ekiu:k«ruuad Z>oeuaient. The only additional
Infarcnucion In tit* >>to«MS III ve*»ioa of tne profile ta • «te»einn»«it ooncantlnB tne r«cUity'ji
ability to uuoept cpent i^otlinerB Cl-e-. R.CTR>V wustK code KO88) MnU «• itenernl atAt
ised (
concerning revis
(nYornamUon vutoiuitted in tbe 19V4- update.
cHll SxtrHh Stufft»ra at <7O9) 218-2656 or Ttu« rennonaea to her
Q74O V>y January 3O. 1994. *X*hanl> you I'or yottr cooperuclcvn.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
B91S018642226-051242
START TIME
12-21-94 4-.E2PM
DURATION;
0'53"
SPACES
2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPLETED
9600
NOTE:
No.: OPERATION NUMBER 48
PD : POLLED BY REMOTE SF
3 : SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL
0:00'53"
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STORE & FORWARD Rl
POLLINC A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT G2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULT1-POLLINC RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
ENSCO, El Dorado, Arkansas
ENSCO operates three rotary kiln incinerators at this RCRA Part B permitted
facility. Each kiln can burn liquids, pumpable sludges, nonpumpable sludges,
containerized solids, bulk solids, compressed gases, and soils. Two of the kilns feed into
one secondary chamber with a permitted combined feed rate of 29,718 pounds per hour.
The third kiln has a permitted feed rate of 12,912 pounds per hour.
ENSCO submitted confidential business information on quantities burned in 1993
and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included in the
aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit 2-X. ENSCO does accepts K088 wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: ENSCO
El Dorado, Arkansas
Contact Name: Ed Payton
Telephone Number: (501) 863-7173
Fax Number: (501) 864-2226
Date: 10/11/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Mr. Payton verbally confirmed that the facility is currently permitted to accept K088
wastes. The facility does not currently handle any K088 wastes. The facility is equipped with
grinding facilities, however, they cannot accept any wastes larger than a 55-gallon drum.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
Roebuck, South Carolina
Contact Name: David DeSha
Telephone Number. (803) 576-1085
Fax Number (803)551-4920
Date: January 5,1995
ICF Contact Name Anne Cowan
Mr. DeSha verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Laidlaw Environmental Services,
Inc., Roebuck, South Carolina, does not contain any confidential information. He also suggested
a wording change for the second sentence- from "one liquid injection unit" to "one hazardous
waste liquid injection incinerator."
-------
JTAC SIIVTTLE
JLNCORJPOR^VTEO
rvo-i>
TOt
CMOMt
Hncllltie* Kubmitctna HWTC Survisys
r>«vid Desii*
I~*t«ll»%v Bavtrotamaituxl JS«r-vK»M». Inu..
C^nmllnn
Snmta Su&CGonl
XGX* XocorpuritCkxl.
Gupiivily
Ph«m«>: 2
Ountractur for the Pli«u>« \ll
CBT IMIMM /S^ort^tcrf wltb
«M»U \v*** grrc vipciaus
IW3
Z>»toi
10. 1994
fue* 1 of 2
the t>wcK0rrombM9 •«««*\«a. nncl vpont r>otlinctrO-< «>»« RH«u»o XT C^pneiiy
XnulyMU Bmcktfround Idocum«nl>. EJ*/>k plans to include toriaff proifltoa of eueh cnmmnreial
conabustioti facility in It* cufMiutty Kntitynla I w»cK ground unit typmi. wHJttea MecepteU. MUI! tieut
r«l«u»« r»tiou«. AJthuuifh «cnna of t>ii» taiffnrmavion is in the {nitrite dornnin. the entire
1W3 M \VTCT r«]«pfJTi»«i« unU th» 1994 updote bove aevertlteleaa »x»er» MiHmlrtecl n» CJU1.
The T»urpnne tvr tti«t.enrre»panUano(s in tu cajnflim tt»e nun-conCUcuUeiUty of
opvciflc Uutu. •Iwxnvntw «on«u.i>M>«J in Chct fmclllty |?rafile*.TV> thia «»r»cl pleaius revivixv the
MttMc>MMl profiiB und cM»tifiini cHnt it cU««« not c.ucntniii CBI or. if ir doe*, pinnae-, mark the-.
»lM»c££ic; luTuiJDMtiun ttwa* »hc»uld l>e xreAted lift confidential. Oonifldontin) olemanm in rhe
profile MvilJ t»e blaalead eon in the ston-CXBl voivlcui of ttuo Pi«pc«»o*J Phiuic III
Xtnatly»i» BttckarounU Z>oc*itaaai. JPJease nate trun this is the n«mc procedure. th»i
foUcTwvtstl for the PhnJtc II Onpocfty AAnlymis IBnelccrauncl t>ot:uTci«;n*. The only udtlltUinal
Information in thw Pltu»<» III vecniu.it of the profile is u stutement ct»r»cernir»g the
utility tr> occopt spent p«ttliners C'-D-. R.CR./V •MW»te ct>Ue ICOSfl) u.nd n B«ner»l
ennoernlng revined Ittf/oraMitian •uUaiitted lu tlie lt»4»1 upauut.
e* tc> her n« <7O3) O:\4-
by January 3O. 14MM. Th
3rd »t (7U3) 21H-2oS«S cir fnx r<»
mnk you t'or yu«jr uoopettitiou.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
GSX-P1NEWOOD
.START TIMK
ia- 19-94 l:53PM
DURATION
1'05"
WPACES
2/ a
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPLETED
9600
NOTE:
No.
"D
:B
TOTAL
0:01'05"
OPERATION NUMBER 48
POLLED BY REMOTE SF
SEND to MAILBOX PC
48(K)BIJS SELECTED EC
STORE & FORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT C2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., Roebuck, South Carolina
This facility is fully permitted by the EPA but is under interim status with the state
regulatory agency. Laidlaw operates one liquid injection unit that injects and burns
pumpable liquids. The CBI provided included quantities of waste burned in 1993 and
maximum current practical "burning capacity. These estimates are included in the
aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit 2-X.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: L.W.D. Inc.
Calvert City, Kentucky
Contact Name: Gary Metcalf
Telephone Number. (502)395-8313
Pax Number. (502)395-8153
Date: December 20,1994
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Metcalf verbally confirmed that the facility profile for L.W.D. Inc., Calvert City,
Kentucky, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TTRAN SIVULTTAJL
TCEICOKD
^^ ICF Ir«7c:oRPOR>v.TE:i>
VMIU J.M MlMiMvr t^irfwc. VITBUMB ^oun\-\ttfl rmn MwBUimr (7tn> 9M.vT«u
T«>* facilltie* SubnUttLnM WWTC: Survey*
G-ary MutuaUT Puut: (5O2) av^-tt^B
l_Vy.D. lee.. Calvert City. Kentucky . ^B
FMOHfi Sarah Stafford Plinne: (7U9> 218«2o£>A
ICF Incorporated, E*»/K. dmtrawiur Cor cUe PHmmu III L.£>R.
Capaciry Xouly«i»
SUHJlCCTi CBI iMue* Awtouiated with Data Contained in the 1V93
HWTO filurvay
Data>: Dowsmber If*. !«*•** • . Pago t of 2
____ in currently wrftinjg the tin ck ground clocuraerrtB fur t capacity u.n«ly*t» for th
l»ropo>ed Phuae III LJ3R. Rule ttoMt cover* deeliuriwcuvrteiBcl •waateM'Mtera. enrtxtrnate und
nrsunobrumine •WM»tc». «nd spent p. BI">K. plan* to Induile ortof prndtant of ••cH onauneiotaa
oorrtbuKtiun tncillty «n ic* uufaaeity KnalyvU baokBrouncl documvnt. Thoae facility profile*
contain infra-motion an e*«h ratdllty including tne unit tyjxo*. wtuitoa oceepted. and
t-elau**
pnrpnae of thte eorraapundoaaa i» to onndran th« n«n>-ocmfldenti«Uty of
•peetfle data eleznwnui ormtained in the facility profile*. To thte e*ul pleaae review tnv
attnchuU protTle and cajnCrm that ll doe* not contaiu CBI or. tf it dee*, piettae mark ttoc
apeciSc Inforauitiuo tbat «Hould bo Tr«»a.t»*l a* confidvatiaJ. ConftrtarttioJ alament* lu the
proille %vill »x» tvUurkteed out in «no non-CBI v«r*lon of lh« >Pritr>i-»iieVna4y«i* BaokKround Octcomcxxt. Plcuuie nnte that tnta i» tac came i>rueedure that we
folluwvM.1 frw the 1>haa-«-. RCTFOV waste code KOftH).
PleM*e eaU Sarah StuCfurd. at C7O3> 218-ZA56 or fi
hy January 3O. IVW
-------
L.W.D. Inc., Calvert City, Kentucky
This facility is currently operating under interim status. L.W.D. Inc. has three
incinerators at this facility: one liquid injection unit and two rotary kilns. The liquid
injection incinerator burns liquids. The rotary kilns burn liquids, bulk solids,
containerized solids, and pumpable sludges. The liquid injection unit has a thermal input
of 40 MMBtu/hour. The rotary kilns have thermal inputs of 50 MMBtu/hour and 100
MMBtu/hour.
This facility Submitted its survey independent of the set suDmiued by HWTC The
facility provided information on quantities burned in 1992 and maximum practical
burning capacities. These estimates are included in the aggregated CB1 estimate in
Exhibit 2-X. L.WJD. Inc. does accept K088 wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Norlite Corporation
Cohoes, New York
Contact Name: Ed Berger
Telephone Number (518)235-0401
Fax Number (518)235-0233
Date: January 5,1995
ICF Contact Name: Anne Cowan
Mr. Berger verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Norlite Corporation, Cohoes,
New York, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TOECORJD
22O31-120T
FsciUtloft Suhnuttina MWTC Survey*
B*l Burner - •
Morlit«i Corporation. Gc»h«MM.. Now V«»rk
239-0233
FKOMi
SUBJECT!
Sarah Stafford Hhtma: „
ICTf Incorporated. SPA CnntiMctor tor ttto l*hawj HI
Ct«f>MUlty Analysis ^
OBI Issues AssocisUMl with Data Contained in the* 199a
MWTC Survey
Dsto:
mmner 19.
P»*c 1 of a
EPA
etui entry writing the t»acKarrrrur»d document* fnr its capacity antdysis for the
•e III I_DK Rule that covers deehMmuterixed "wawtewiitBrs. earrusmatte nnd
nrgunobromlne wastea. nnd spent potliners. A*m in the past (e.0.. the HHuse 11 Capacity
/Kaixrysis Baukjuound Orkcta^nent^, BJ">^. pluns to inetude nrief prirfllos of each er*inaneruia]
combustion facility in its capacity analysis nadcffrotrnd document. *l*ho*e fucility proHles
contain Intorntatlon on ectch facility rncludlntf the unit types, waatea accepted, and Heat
releusei ratines. Allhouffh son-m of this Information is in trie public domain, the enrlre
1WW3 HWTC responses und the 1VSM* update bave nevertheless beer* aubacutted as CBl.
this correspondonoe is
Th«»
to —"T-*|T*IT the non-confidentiality of
'data* elements contained tn Ate (acUlty pTofUos. To this end please review the
uttttdicd uro£Ue and confirm that it does not wuntain CBI or. if it does, please mark tne
•pewiCiu inrnrmation thu« should be treated as confidential. CoaCdantlal elr.mentK in Oiu
profile -will ne blanked out in the non-CBl version of tl»e Proposed Phnse III Capacity
>KT>atyais Bauk«ro%>ncl Oojeuoacmt. Please note ttoat this Is the same pruondure that -we
followed £OT thn 'PHaae Tl Capacity .Anatysik ^SaolCBTOuntl T>ocumBnt. The only additional
in£oi-rnn.tion in the I*nasc 111 •version of the profile Is a statement uoneernlny; the facility's
ability to accept spent potliners (i.e.. R.GR.A •waste uode ICOIM).
Plense call Sarah Stafford at <7O35 21» 2oS« or fa* responaek to her at
by January 3O. 1994.. Thank you Cor your cooperation.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT #*
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
518 235 0233
START TIME
12-19-94 l:56PM
DURATION
0-55-
«PAGES
•2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPLETED
144-00
NOTE:
No.
TOTAL
0:00-55"
B
OPERATION NUMBER 48
POLLED BY REMOTE SF
SEND T<> MAILBOX PC
48UOBPS SELECTED
STORE & FORWARD
POLLING A REMOTE
EC :'ERROR CORRECT
Rl : RELAY INITIATE
MP : MULTI-POLLING
C2
RS
RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO
-------
Norlite Corporation, Cohoes, New York
This RCRA Part B permitted incineration facility operates two rotary aggregate
kilns that burn liquids and pumpable sludges. The kilns are RCRA-permitted as
incinerators. Liquids are injected and sludges are pumped into the kiln. Each loin has a
thermal input of 62 MMBtu/hour. New York officials are considering a permit
modification to increase Norlite's solid feed capacity.
Norlite submitted confidential information on quantities of waste burned in 1992
and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included in the
aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit 2-X.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Contact Name Dean Salvador
Telephone Number. (504) 359-3407
Fax Number (504) 359-3705
Date: December 28,1994
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Salvador indicated in a voicemail message that the facility profile for Rhone-Poulenc
Basic Chemicals Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, does not contain any confidential
information. ;
-------
FA.CSHVm.JE
TR.AJV S1VHTTAJL
IOF
r>Mf:fllti«w Submitting HWTC Surveys
— • — - - ^ . KMMS C»O«) 3SS-370S
tVMlfc Ccftinpuny.
mvorw**l*c3ul«ane
StaCfortl
1CT Incarporacee,
C«r>«eicy
Contract
t>hun«:
or For «He I»b
ITT
GBX Issues A
wi«l> D«ta Oonialned In tbn
HWTC Survey And 19M CTTC Update
UMA: December IV. 1VW4
Puae 1 of 2
ta currtm
III
tly
L.D
tly ng the bt*ck|{TX>uncl Uocumanta for ItB capacity onatysin lor the
R.ulo that envent dcotiuracterlzcd wa«tewaterK. UMrtoauxiMte M4MJ
d Mpout potUntar*. As in tike put (O.B.. «be Pltmse IX Cnp«.clry
r>oei«raeait>l Bl'V^ plnn» to include ririet proruow r»t e»eh ecimmercU»l
crtmtnutlon fueittty in It* capucdty unuly«l» tMidcKround (|ocu«noat. T2io«e facility
concala Inftormntion on caen faciUty Includlns tHe unit type*. wiuKoit aouepteU. anU
release ratings. AltnouBn, some of tnis in£urznatian i» in tnta public domain, the entire
1993 WWTC <«WPUZUMM «vncl UM> 19»« wpUwte ba-ve novort.nolas« Hoen Kutvmtttoci an CTBI.
TTie fvurpcMM* irf chte eorraspitndtmcB la to confirm the nori-eortficto«itlallty of
•peclOc data element* oontained ill tne fm-lllry profile*. To ttU» nn«.l pl««««t r«v1««v tH«
tinaotted prufile and uunfina tnat it does not contain CB1 or. if it does, please oaarlc ton
•peciCie information tnat shnuld rws treated a* eonfldenrial. Confidential cUemtmtB in Tne
profile twill toe blanked out in the non-CBI •version of the Proposed Pnaac III Gepa«;i*y
/Vnatyiila BadcsroimU Duuumunt. Ploasc note inm tnis is tbe same procedure, thai MVC
followed tor the fbase XI Capacity Analysis BaolCffrouAd Document. TThe only additional
information In the PhaiMS III version of the profile is »i auttement cuncvrxiine the facility's
ability to accept spent potliners Z1H-2ASe or «a» responses to her at (7O3~)
37-1O Hy January 3O. lttO4. 1*h*an1c you for your cooperution.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
## COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
I
REMOTE STATION
5U4 3S9 3705
START TIME
12-19-94 2:O1PM
DURATION
0'47"
SPACES
2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESl.'LTS
COMPLETED
14400
NOtE:
No.
PD
MB
TOTAL
0:00'47"
OPERATION NUMBER 48
POLlJiD BY REMOTE SF
SEMD TO MAILBOX PC
4HOOBPS SELECTED EC
SPORE & FORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT G'2
RELAY INITIATE RS
ML'LTl-POLL INC KM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY SI ATION
RECEIVE TO MEMOR'
-------
Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
This RCRA Part B permitted facility operates two liquid injection incinerators.
These incinerators have permitted thermal inputs of 170 MMBtu/hour and 234
MMBtu/hour. This facility can accept liquids and pumpable sludges. The pumpable
sludges must either lie slurried or have a sufficiently low viscosity to be injected into the
furnace. .
Rhone-Poulenc submitted confidential information on quantifies burned in 1993
and maximum practical capacity. These estimates are included in the aggregated Cfil
estimates in Exhibit 2-X.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company
Hammond, Indiana
Contact Name: Tom Benner
Telephone Number. (219) 932-7651
Fax Number (219) 932-0524
Date: January 16,1995
ICF Contact Name: Anne Cowan
Mr. Benner indicated in a voicemail message that the facility profile for Rhone-Poulenc
Basic Chemicals Company, Hammond, Indiana, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
"F AC SHVIX JUE
TTIiAJM SIVUTTAJ-
HiuslUUe* Submitting WWTC Survey* •
Walter fdeller Hw. <219) 9^2 OS24
TVbon«-PotiU;nc B«»ic CiMiuiiaal* O«»mp*.ny. Hammond.
Indiana
llkOlVli
BtJWJXECTi
Smrwti St.CTorrt
X»tioa
Contractor fur th«£ Pba»e III t-OI*
CT.M1 LAsu«a ^d document. Those ffucUlty pi«.iCU«aa
_ Although anme »f thta infurrantiari i» in the public domain, tne entire
j-fvVT'Cf re*tic->ru>ea end cne 399A update have nevervtaeieaa Jr»t»43r« aunmittied aa CB1.
is to cor-*«TTn the non-ennficlentliillty of
contained iin the fncility r»ror§la«i.To Kuiai en«J pleHae revie»M the
_ profile end ennrlrm thnt it does not enntain CB1 or. if it does. plea«e murk the
infornaatiun th*n ahould he treated an cunfidential. Confidential «*lem«nt« in the
Tnoflle will be n tanked out In the non-CBT verait«n of the Pruprmed Phaae III Capacity
xVnalyaJK Saekccround Document. Pleuae note tnat thi» ia tbe mirnn procedure that -we
followed tor the Phaae n Oupucity .AmUysiu Back|{ruund Document. The only uclditionnl
information in the Prmae ITT •veiaiou of. the profile IK e stntninent concerning the faciiity'n
to Accept npent potliaera (i.e., R.C7R./V waste code K.O88) and n general statement
raviaed information hubxaltted in the 1«*y* update.
-.» to her (it
The purpnae of tnl» correspondertee
data " -.-....-.-. -.
Pleiute eoll
y JanuMry SO. 1O94.
at C7O3) 21tt-2<>S«> or
Thunk you far your eoopernticm
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT #*
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
219 932 0524
START TIME 1 01 RAT ION
1
12-19-94 • l:58PM
J ' 00"
SPACES
2/ 2
MODE
RRSl'I.TS
EC COMPLETED
9UOO
NOTE:
No. : OPERATION NUMBER 48
D : POLLED BY REMOTE SF
.iB : SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL O:01'OO"
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STOKE & FORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT G2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO MEMOR
-------
Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Hammond, Indiana
This facility submitted confidential information on quantities burned in 1993 and
maximum practical burning capacity. It is operating with an interim status BIF permit.
The industrial furnace at this facility burns liquid wastes only.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company
Houston, Texas
Contact Name: Ann Gallant
Telephone Number (713) 427-3108
Fax Number. (713)427-1527
Date: ' January 5,1995
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Ms. Gallant verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals
Company, Houston, Texas, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TR-AJST S^^ITTAJL-
FfelrBui. Virginia 22O31-12O7
Pax Mumlm-:
B2A.B74O
C713)
Facilities Submitting HWTC Surveys
Ann Oallant
| Rhcioe-Po>*leno Basic Chemicals Company, Houston. Toca*
FROMi I Sarab Stafford Pbone: C*°3> 218-2636
| ICF Incorporated. X3PA Contractor for the Phase XXX Z.DR
CBI Im«u*« >ka»ocl«tcirt witfe ^At« Contttla«cf la til* 1993
HWTC Survey »nd 1994 ETC Update
December 2O. 1994
Pafte 1 of 2
1 a,
. is currently writing the background documents for its* capacity analysis for the
Proposed Phase TIT XJDR. Rule that covers deeharacterixed wastewetera, earbamate and
organobroxnlne -wastes, and spent potllners. As in the past (e.g.. the Phase XI Capacity
Analysis Background Document). X3PA plans to include brief profiles of each commercial
combustion facility tn its capacity analysis background document. Those facility profiles
contain information on each facility (Including the unit Types, wastes accepted, and heat
release ratings. Although some of tjsis information is in the public domain, the entire
1993 WWTC responses and the 1994 update have nevertheless been submitted as OBI.
The purpose of this correspondence is to confirm the non-confldentlallTy of
specific data elements contained in the facility profiles. To this end please review the
attached profile and confirm that it Idoes not contain CBX or. if It does, please mark the
specific information that should be tjreated as confidential. . Confidential elements in the
profile will be blanked out in the nom-CBI version of the Proposed Phase XXX Capacity
Analysis Background Document. Please note that this is the same procedure that we
followed for the Phase XX Capacity Axmlyuls Background Document. The only additional
information in the Phase XXI version! of the profile is a statement concerning the facility's
ability to accept spent potliners Ci-e-'r RGRA waste code ICO88) and a general statement •
concerning revised information submitted In the 1994 update.
Please call Sarah Stafford at K7O3) 21B-2656 or fax responses to her at C7O3) 934.
974O by January 3O. 1994. Thank y^»u for your cooperation.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
WAS SENT
** COUNT **
# 2
*** SEND ***
NO
1
REMOTE STATION I. D.
713 427 1527
START TIME
1- 5-95 2: 07PM
DURATION | 8PAGES
1-A7- | 2
COMMENT
TOTAL 0:01-47-
XEROX TELECOPIER
-------
Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company, Houston, Texas
This RCRA Part B permitted facility burns liquids in one liquid injection
incinerator. The incinerator has a thermal input of 205 MMBtu/hour.
Rhone-Poulenc reported waste quantities burned in 1993 and maximum practical
burning capacities as CB1. These estimates are included in the aggregated CBI estimate
in Exhibit 2-X.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rollins Environmental Services
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Contact Name:' Mike DeCarlo
Telephone Number. (504)778-1234
Fax Number. (504)778-3510
Date: January 6,1995
ICF Contact Name: Anne Cowan
Mr. DeCarlo verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Rollins Environmental
Services, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, does not contain any confidential information. He also noted
that the free-standing drum shredder mentioned as planned in the last sentence of the fourth
paragraph is operational. He suggests deleting this sentence and adding "There is also a free-
standing drum shredder used for repacking solids" to the second paragraph. He also suggests that
the last sentence of the second paragraph be deleted.
-------
TVWC SI3VULLE
J=tAN STVMTTAI-
FtECORJL*
TOi
ntc>ivt>
SUKJECTi
PBBiMtlw* Submitting WWTC: Survey*
Ntitc* DeCarto Fm-rn.-
RolUnx EnvirnrtmentHl Services. Bston Rouse.
Ssrab StufTord
Gcmtrae*or fen
Pttune:
ITT
C7B1 Issues Associated wlttibata Contained In
H WTC: Survey and 1«»O4 ETC Update
lV.ru
«K Deoomb
1«. 1994
»*»B0 t or 2
EPA i» currently writing the nrnekground documents for Its caoadty analysis .for the
oroanobromine -wastes. MTU* spent potHners. AM In the past CC.B-. the Phnse II GapaiUty
Analysis Boctcgiound .Document). BPA. plans u> inulude brJef profiles of eecii mimmerctal
eotnhusUun facility In its cttpiieity analyslit background docxnnsint. Trio»«r £nclllry profiles
contain informutinn on ench tauilit> includinjc the unit types, wastes accnpt"". ant] neat
release rntinos. A.lttit»u8h some r»f this inforoaattoin i» in tlxu puhllc domain, fhe entice
1993 I-TWTC r^Tirn-"—— and the 1994 update have nevertheless been submitted itm C^Bl. '
The ptnrpoM* crF this eorrusponcienoe la to confirm the 4iun-or»nnaentiaiiry cif
specific Uata clenicota contninecl in the facility nrofiiev. To this end ptoose review the
attached profile and cooHrm ti-.:-.l it does nov coutMict OH I nr. If it does, plenae mark, the
•pectCU: lafornkatlnn tnaT should He treated MS confidential. Confidential element* In the
F»rrrr11e will He blanked out in ttoe non-CBI version of the Proposed Phnsc 111 Cu-pacity
>\nalyais BachKrrraiui Document. Please note that this is ttoe seme procedure thsvt xve
followed for the Plu*se U Capacity AxiaJysta Back||ruund r»ocumeot. Tr»e only xulUlUonnl
information in the Phase 111 version of the protile is a statement concexiuiiB the factlity-v
to acczept spent potliuefs Ci-"-« f*CTR.>*w. wust«s code K.O8B> and r« general stutemcnt
revised Infornnation sunmltteU in tno 1X«9A upciuta.
Please call Sarnh StafforU at (* n.%) 21t4>26So or f»«x renp
37AO t»y Jaituary 3O, 199A. TYtanlc yovi lor y«tur eooperntion.
onses to her at
93*-
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION'
START TIME
12-19-9* 2: 04PM
DURATION
1'12"
SPACES
2/ 2
siopn
EC
RH5VII.TS
COMPLETES)
9600
NOTE'-
\o.
-0
J
TOTAL
0:01'12"
OPERATION NUMBER 48
POLLED BY REMOTE SF
SEND TO MAILBOX PC
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STORE & FORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
HRROR COKRECT G2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULT I-POLL. ING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO'MENU
-------
Rollins Environmental Services, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
This RCRA Part B permitted facility consists of an ashing rotary kiln, liquid
burner, and an afterburner. The thermal input to the unit is rated at 95.6 MMBtu/hour.
Several mechanisms are used to feed waste into the incinerator system. Liquids
are atomized under air pressure and injected into the liquid burner and afterburner
chamber. A positive displacement pump feeds pumpable sludgdl into the rotary kiln.
Containerized solids are fed into the unit via a conveyor system. This facility generally
does not accept bulk solids, but it does accept soils.
Confidential capacity information provided by the facility included the waste
quantities burned during 1993 and the maximum practical burning capacity. These
estimates are included in the aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit 2-X. This facility
indicated that it does accept K088 wastes.
Rollins plans to replace its rotary kiln with two new units by 1997. This
modification should increase the capacity of the facility by twenty percent. Plans also
include installation of a free-standing drum shredder.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rollins Environmental Services
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Contact Name: Jessie Glasper and Teresa Wall
Telephone Number. (504) 778-3545
Fax Number. (504) 778-3510 .
Date: 10/12/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Ms. Wall verbally confirmed that the facility can/will accept K088 wastes. Mr. Glasper
stated that the Baton Rouge facility could only accept small volumes of K088 because the large
volumes of fluorides in the K088 cause problems in the disposal process. This is due to the
nature of the Baton Rouge scrubber system. It is not designed to handle large quantities of
fluorides. '
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rollins Environmental ^Services
Bridgeport, New Jersey
Contact Name: Mike Pusco
Telephone Number (302) 426-4700
Fax Number. (302)426-3339
Date: January 6,1995
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Fusco verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Rollins Environmental Services,
Bridgeport, New Jersey, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TTRAJ** SIVLTTTAJL
T>O«
f*t«»ts
SUBJECT!
Faciliti
fwtllc*
Kolli
Subaullioa I-OVTO: Surveys
Environment*! Services. Bridgeport. N»w Jersey
Snrwb Sturfiirct
Id* tocnrpoi«l«Kl,
Anitlyns
Phone: C?<>-*> 2ia-2e»3«»
Contractor Cur I h«= PlisjM III ' T-»ra
OBI Issues Associated •witb £3utM Contained in the 1W3
Survey and, 1994 IB1(_ UfuJiairi
Dato:
fit?A. J« currently writing the t»eckj(rou»»d documents rrrr Itss/supacity analysis for the
r*ropoi>ed Phusa 111 UDR. Rule that covers decharacterized wustcwatcrs. uarbamate and
orgunoarornine wiurtea. and spent potllners,. A* in the pact Ce.tf.. the .Phase II Capacity
/Vnulysis Background .Ooeunoent), EPA, plans to includu brief pro£ilea erf each commercial
combustion fnnlllry in its cttpticity Vnulysis BaekvrmarMj J^ocuxneat. Please rtotts that this Is the mmmrt procedure that we
Followed for the Phase Cl Oapaelry XKnalysto DackBrouiid Oouuraenl. The only ailditionnl
infurnaatlon in the Phusa III version of the pzo£Ue ts n. statement concernins the facility's
ehility to uccent spent potliners
-------
Rollins Environmental Services, Bridgeport, New Jersey
This RCRA Part B permitted facility operates one slagging rotary kiln with an
afterburner. The thermal input to the system is rated at 135 MMBtu/hour.
Several mechanisms are used to feed liquids, pumpable sludges, containerized
solids, compressed gases, and soils into the incinerator system. Liquids are atomized
under air pressure and injected into the Loddby liquid burner and afterburner chamber.
A positive displacement pump feeds pumpable sludges into the rotay kiln. This facility
generally does not accept bulk solids.
This facility reported quantities of waste burned in 1993 and maximum practical
burning capacities as CBL These estimates are included in the aggregated CBI estimate
in Exhibit 2-X.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rollins Environmental Services
Deer Park, Texas
Contact Name: Robert White
Telephone Number (713) 478-2141
Fax Number (713)930-2418
Date: January 6,1995
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. White verbally confirmed that the facility profile for Rollins Environmental Services,
Deer Park, Texas, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
FA.C SITVIIUS
TRAIN SJVf ITTAJL-
RECORD
onoo
TOt
FKOIVli
SXJBJISCTt
FtwiiUtUii. Submitting HV*TC Survey*
Robert MvMiluj KMXJ (71H) V:4O-1U>. 1 U
Rxilltna Knvirnotnent*! Service*. Oc-f.r Pnrlc. Tcxns
Sarah SitulfuriJ
1CU» Incorporate!.
. Phone: <7O3j 218-26r>iV
CViniruuitir lor th<» Phaau XXX
CBT laauoa >Vaaociated xwith OatA Containetl in Ihc 1MJB
HVyri'C Survoy nad 1994 KTC XJpOnte
Oxte: E>wcai..Hcr 19.
1 of 2
1» currently wrltlriK the tonck.Brcmr.tl cluoumonts ft^r UK cuayitcity nn»ly»i» for ttoe
Pltaae III ' .!•>»* Rule (tittt cMivcsm UectinrttuterlausU «waa«e>wa.term. uurbuvnatu. and
waaten. and .pent T>otlinerc. J*M in »too p««t Cts.tt-. the Phwu: II Capacity
Backoround rXjciiTn»n»). EPA. piMix* to include toritrf proXilea cif ewuta cocxxmercuil
comMuatUvn futility In ita cupuuity aaojyala tuuflcKroutid drxnarnenu Tno»e facility ironic*
contuin infornuttttMi ua eoeti •facility Including the unit type*, wnates ac«:ap««xl, u.nd IIOMI
>Mtht3U»h vome or thiv inToroaatlon ta in tlto public doiuuOn. Uie tantlre
HVvTC reaponaaw and the 1994 update have novertheiean heen submitted aa CB1.
The purpoao of thia correapondeneu la to conflnn tne non eoogdentiaJKy of
apecific dura elements conuiined in the facility i-uv.iOlea. To thia imd pleane revie«v xtiT«ti*kl. Cuntidentinl elementa an _«h*.
prufile will r»«r. blanked r.nt in the nun-CBI veraion of tUe Propoaed fhuae Hi Capacity
/\.t>alyai« Saekaround Xdociaoi«*ix. .Plaaae note tAaat tlUa ia The atuna> procedure that wn9
followed tor the Phaae II Capacity XN.iiH.tyxU J3«clbaround 'Document. Tlic only additional
information in the f»haae 111 veraion of the profile ia n, stwteiTtcsnt cortcorninK the fucility's
ubQity to auc«pt apent pot liners (i.e.. ROR.A. waalc^uudw KU'M-tB'J and n general (itatcrncnt
revised Iz " " ------ -•-- --—.- --
concerning
Izafnrmation aubuiitted In The 1994 updnle.
Pleaae cull Sarwh StaO'cird at 17O3) ZlS-ZfiSfr or fax rcaponxca to .her ot
by January 3O, 1994. Tltaiik you for your unoperation.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT **•
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE SPAT I ON
7139302418
START TIME
12-19-9+ 2:OOPM
DURATION
O'Gl"
#PAGES
2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPLETED
I'M 00
NOTE:
'io. : OPERATION \LMBER 48
D : POLLED BY REMOTE SF
MB = SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL
O-.OO'Sl'
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STORE & FORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT
RELAY INITIATE
MULTI-POLLING
G2 : G2 COMMUNICATION
RS : RELAY STATION '
RM : RECEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
Rollins Environmental Services, Deer Park, Texas
This RCRA Part B permitted facility has three incineration units-two rotary kilns
with afterburners, and one rotary reactor. Each rotary kiln system has a thermal input of
180 MMBtu/hour, The rotary reactor has a thermal input of 33.5 MMBtu/hour. Each
train has several feed mechanisms that utilize concrete pumps to feed pumpable sludges
and an elevator feed for containers. A clamshell/crane feeds bulk solids into the rotary
reactor.
Rollins reported confidential information on quantities burned in 1993 and
maximum practical capacity. These estimates are included in the aggregated CBI
estimates in Exhibit 2-X. This facility does accept K088 wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Rollins Environmental Services
Deer Park, Texas
Contact Name: Lee Hover
Telephone Number: (713) 930-2380
Fax Number (713) 930-2418
Date: 10/12/95
iCF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Mr. Hoover verbally confirmed that the facility can/will accept K088 wastes. Mr. Hoover
stated that the Deer Park facility could only accept small volumes of K088 because the large
volumes of fluorides in the K088 cause problems in the disposal process. This is due to the
nature of the Deer Park scrubber system. It is not designed to handle large quantities of
fluorides.
Mr. Hoover did state that the Rollins Environmental Services facility in New Jersey has a
scrubber designed to handle fluorides. This facility would be able to handle large volumes of
K088. Mr. Hoover provided the following contact name and number at the Rollins
Environmental Services headquarters: Fred Gerdis (302) 426-3168.
Mr. Hoover also provided the following names of additional companies that may be able
to handle K088 wastes:
Alcoa - Palestine, TX
Alcan - Aluminum Company of Canada
Reynolds Metals - Bauxite, AR (may have a delisting in 40 CFR, they may not be permitted
to take off-site wastes) .
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Ross Incineration Services
Grafton, Ohio
Contact Name: Art Hargate
»
Telephone Number. (216) 748-2200
Fax Number (216)748-1399
Date: December 20,1994
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Hargate indicated by fax that the facility profile for Ross incineration Services,
Grafton, Ohio, does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TRAJST S 1V4¥TTAL
RCOORD
<^ KCIT I>*CORPOltA/T15:r»
0^00 r.M MJctXMiy Ffeirttuc. Viratnl- 32t»l.iao7 !>•« Mumocr: CTO3) «s*.»7-o
TUi FMCllitie^ Submlttlna H WTC Survey*
R.CHU InaiiiernUon Services. Crnllon. OKIo •
KKOVli . Sarah Stafford . Phone:
1CJF IncorporaleU. EPA. Coacrautui Cor vhe »*H
SXJIUISC^I't CBT Issues Asito*:iutcsniained iu
t-rWTC Surwy onU 1W4 ETC I.JnOutu
(7O3) 218-26^«
uc QX I_r>R.
inn IWH
D«te: rv,.»^,bor 1«. I«SM
Ptatfio 1 <^r 2
fa currenlly -writtnic tiie tonekamuncl Uueutn«nt> . for It* eapneiry anuly>im for the
iiKe 111 L>DK Rule ttiat c«»ven» dechnTHCici'izod wnac^wotem, cnrbiuiiute ttncl
tir«nnot»-uxiune wnjitea. and spent potlinera. ^Jt in tae pact (e.u-. the PTiiue XX OtipacUty
A-nalymia BoefcurounU l>ucumont> EP^^. plan* to Include brief profile* of ouch commercial
eomrtuMtton -facility In it» (Mtpaejty nnalymin buukground document. 'l~ho«e facility proniex
contain InfurrnMtJun .on oneb faciHty inclucUns the unit type*. wui>te» uccept«£d. anU heat
release rtitlnff*. /Vlthuuicn MORI* of. thin UaTucuiatlon «• In the public domain, tne entire
1093 X-TWTCr reaporwoa and the 1904 uuvJote have neverthalttiut l>ee«t submitted AO CBT.
*Th<£ riuruoae of tnl» enrresponoence to to eonOraa tlte non-oonndentUklHy ro*- orlnre that we
follnvvecl for the J»hn»e TT Capacity Analyttiu Baekaround Document^ Tlic only atlditjonul
lnt'orm»»«tr«n in the Phase m veraion. of the profile in n stAtentent concerninic the facility**
ability to acoept Mpent potliner* (i.e.. I*OR.>X. waste uo«le ICtWtA) and u Kenernl Htatcmunt
reviseU inJformatiua. submitted in the 1994. update.
Please call Sarah Stafford at C"7O3) ZlS-ZoSri or fetx reaponnc* 10 tier nt {7O3) «J34-
374O by January SO, 1994. Titanic you for your cooperation. '
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
Nio.
1
REMOTE STATION1
y 16748 1267
START TIME
12-19-9+ 2: 11PM
DURATION
1'29"
0PAGES
2/ 2
MODE
RESULTS
COMPLETED
9600
NOTE =
No.
PD
MB
TOTAL
0:01
OPERATION NUMBER +8
POLLED BY REMOTE SF
SEND TO MAIUJOX PG
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STORE & FORWARD Rl
POLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT G2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
2167481399
ROSS COMPANIES
F-iei T-045. P-0G2 DEC 20 '94 I«r52
ROM Inciacnttun Service*, Cnrftoo, Ohio
Thfa incineration facility ha* & RCRA Part B permit Ron's rotary kiln
incinerator bum* liquids, nonpumpable sludges, containerized solids, bulk sulitk,
ipreued gates, and aoila. Solids and containerized waste are fed to the kin via four
feed jncchajunxis *tftf feed intn a gravity £eed cb\rt^
CBI provided In the survey included yraste quantities burned during 1993 and
practical "barring capacities These wtimatei are included to the aggregated
Bsnmate in
• 0
/
-------
TRAN SlVtlTTAJI-
tntarr (703 >
TOt
r-ueiliUe» Submitting HWTC Survey*
Jonau Si«in
ThermMUCEM. Rock Hill. South (CarnKns
SarMli Stafford . • r»hi_»r»i=. (7OH) 21 H Ze»*!ti
ICF U»u»i PUIMUM*. 12I»A Gonrraotor for tn*> PtWMC II 1 C.OR.
Cnpooicy Analysis
SiUnjttCTi
CB1 lasue
H'WTC: Survey
wttb OHIM «Jonta
In tHe 1993
Dot*: Dcounbcr !•>.
HOB* t of 2
EPA. I* currently ^wrttiziB lite tiaultigruuncl documrcnt* for ^* copocjty nnnlywit for th
Croposed PtiaBci 111 1.DK R-ule ttiat covert* tit-.cliurUclerlxeU wM>te«Mi»ter«, curtaumme mncl
oraunubrorolne •wiutteo. nnd «pent TxiUiiMtrB. A* in.ttua pnat Ce.a-> xtie rtiuc II CUipixcity
XKnnlyai* BnukKruund Document). EPA plicjunl» Booto or trita inforrnntlnn in in tiio pultlle doxnuin. the entire
l-TWTC; renpocu>e« «nd the 1994 upUuUt Hmvo. oevertteelena been *ubRilttc«l on CBI.
The r»urpoae of ttiin cc»rre«porui«i»ier« Hi to ennflvm trie non-cundclenTlallry of
ducu element* conittined in the facility profile*. To ttii> end pleM»a revioow the •
prxrHIo vnU wi»n> rn that It doe* nctt eaotiun OBI or. if It cioee. pleiMte mitrlt tJte
Infaa-UMttioo that should IMI treAteci m» cuniidentMkl. Oonfiuund Document. The only uU utatemeni coricerntnai the fitciliTy'it
HUiUty to accept spent poUiners (i.e.. RCRA wraste code K.OHB).
Kleasci cull Sarah Stafford wt C7OX> ^1«-2ci3« or fax responiMso t» tier at (7O3)
374O lay Januuiy 3O. J994. Thunk you for your oooperntlon.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
;\o.
l
REMOTE STATION
BU3 324 8378
START TIMK
12-19-JH 2: 13PM
Dl RAT ION
t -28"
ffPAGES
2/ 2
MODE
RESILTS
COMPLETED
U6OO
\OTE:
\o.
PD
MB
OPERATION \LMBER 4fl
POLLED BY REMOTE SF
SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL 0:01 "28" 2
4800BPS SELECTED EC ERROR c6RRECT G2
SFORE & FORWARD Rl RELAY INITIATE RS
POLLING A REMOTE MP MULTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMINICATION
RliLAY STATION
RECHIVK TO MEMORY
-------
ThermalKEM, Rock Hill, South Carolina
This RCRA Part B permitted facility uses a fixed hearth incinerator with a
thermal input of 42 MMBtu/hour. This facility can accept liquids, pumpable sludges,
nonpumpable sludges, containerized solids, bulk solids, compressed gases, and soils.
Metered pumps feed liquid and sludge wastes and rams feed containerized solids.
Separate machinery feeds aerosol cans directly to the incinerator.
Confidential capacity data provided by the facility include waste quantities burned
during 1992 and maximum practical burning capacities. These estimates are included in
the aggregated CBI estimate in Exhibit 2-X.
In 1992, the facility indicated that it planned to increase sludge/solid capacity by
adding an additional unit, a waste-fired boiler, and additional storage areas. No such
changes in capacity were reported in the 1993 survey.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: USPCI
Clive, Utah
Contact Name: Bill Cobb
Telephone Number (801) 595-4400
Fax Number. (801) 595-4461
Date December 27,1994
ICF Contact Name: Sarah Stafford
Mr. Cobb indicated in a voicemail message that the facility profile for USPCI, Clive, Utah,
does not contain any confidential information.
-------
TOi
PKOM*
HUMJBCTi
fuuilitUat Submit I LUB HVnTC Surveys
Bill Gobb • .
USfCt, CTUvc. LlloH
r*V*. in tbe pn«t (.c.f., tne Phase II Capacity
Background T>ouuxnant), lil*/^ plans to Include hrtef prodlas of each rmmrnoreiol
ion facility in n» capMdty onnlysis rvncKBround document. Those facility prcifiles
ountaiti information on eacn tneility including tne unit types, wastes Accepted, und rn»ai
release jutlzxcs. Although sum« of this Information ia !(• the puHllc domain, the entire
1003 WWTC: respcmscut anvl tfaw 19V4 update have nevertheless been nunrnlttod AM OBI.
-The purpose of tttix eorrespondence is to confirm the non-von'Tldentiality of
*T»ecICc data «sletn«nts contained in the facility proOlos. To this end plexsn rnviewr the
aitac-hod profile and confirm that it doe* .not miiiMtn CRT or. if it doe«. please maik vtae
specific inftirmntion that should be. treated an cctnfidential. Confidential elements in the .
profile «vlll be blanked out In The non-CTOI version of the Proposed Phases XXI
Analysis Baeksround Doctament. Pleawe riotca tnat tills is the iiaino procedure that
Xollowod for the Phase 11 Capacity Analysis Background "Document. The uxuy
informution In the Phases UI veirsion of thet profile is a statement uoneernina cne fucUity's
altility to tiucept spent potliners Ci.*.. R.C3R.A >vasto code K.UKK) and a tienertxl Ktatement
concerning rwiscd information submitted tn the 1994. update.
Kleuse cHll Sarah StulTcud ut C7O3.) 21H-Zr>An or fax response* to her at
374O »y Jauuwry 3O, 19O4-. 'fhanlc you for' yuur cooperation.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
8<>! 595 4461
START TIME
ia-^0-94 9: 50 AM
DURATION
CT48-
4PAGES
2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPLETED
14400
NOTE:
No. : OPERATION NUMBER 48
N : POLLED BY REMOTE SF
: SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL
0:00'48'
4800BPS SELECTED EC
STORE & FORWARD Rl
COLLING A REMOTE MP
ERROR CORRECT G2
RELAY INITIATE RS
MULTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
USPCI, Clivc, Utah
This new facility is RCRA and TSCA permitted. The facility plans to begin 720
hour shakedown testing by late 1994. This facility is not included in EPA's commercial
combustion capacity estimate. The unit has a permitted thermal capacity of 200
MMBtu/hour. This facility will accept liquids, pumpable sludges, containerized solids,
bulk solids, and soils. . •
USPCI did not burn wastes in 1993. Factors assumed in estimating hazardous
waste burning capacity were provided as confidential business information, including
hourly average waste feed rate, and maximum practical burning capacities. These
estimates are not included in the aggregated CBI estimate. USPCI intends to accept
K088 wastes.
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: USPCI
Clive, Utah
Contact Name: BID Cobb
Telephone Number: (801) 5954400
Fax Number. (801) 595-4461
Date: January 11,1995
ICF Contact Name: Anne Cowan
Mr. Cobb verbally confirmed that the updated facility profile for USPCI, Clive, Utah, does
not contain any confidential information. He would like the phrase "early 1995" changed to "late
1995." In addition, USPCI has been purchased by Laidlaw, so we can change the name to
USPCI-Laidlaw if we so choose.
-------
JFAC SUVTTLE
T'Tt A.N S IVf ITTAJL-
RECORD
^^ IGJF riMCORJ^ORyVTEB
••J3tKt 1^.0 MIU<»M>V Vairnoc. virjiint. 33fm-ixO7 >•» Mum
TOi n^cilitie* Submitting ilWI'C: Sv»r%-Oy«
Bill Cobb far
XJSr>CZ. CUvu. Utah
l-'MOn K
Pnico I of 2
Otven itust yxaxii TH«*lllty Ift expected to t>t9 cutnmeruiully uvuilttblo prior to .trie
cl»it«s of the Y»ha«e TIT LJ>R. Aul«« «ve 1io.vo rcvlMod ttoe enpuciry unttlyitiit t»
Include ynur facility. >^V» hnve MUo kliKhtly modified the ftaeilrty demeripticin ttiMt you
nppraved •viit u phtone mcuMutge cm r^tswenalier 27, 1994. 7*leu*e ravliew cite revitMMd
Uescri(*tion •ncJ eonCina tliot it doe* not contain CBI or. If It UtM»». ple>n*e ntsrle vne
BpecJliu iniormaMrin that BixoulU He trentcd an ounfiUcantUU. r*len«e call me i»t (7C13) 21H-
or fax your revponme to (7O3) V34-V74U. 'I'nanlc you for your cooperation.
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT WAS CONFIRMED
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE - SEE DETAILS BELOW)
** COUNT **
TOTAL PAGES SCANNED
TOTAL PAGES CONFIRMED
2
2
*** SEND ***
No.
1
REMOTE STATION
801 595 4461
v • ' '
START TIME
1- 3-95 6: 18PM
DURATION
0 41T
SPACES
2/ 2
MODE
EC
RESULTS
COMPIJTTED
144OO
VOTE:
No. : OPERATION Nl.WBER 48
PD : POLLED BY REMOTE SF
MB : SEND TO MAILBOX PC
TOTAL 0:00 42" 2
4000BPS SEU-CTED EC ERROR CORRECT G2
STOKE & FORWARD Rl RELAY INITIATE RS
POLLING A REMOTE MP Ml.'LTI-POLLING RM
G2 COMMUNICATION
RELAY STATION
RECEIVE TO MEMORY
-------
USPCI, Clive, Utah
This new facility is RCRA and TSCA permitted. The facility is currently in 720
hour shakedown testing and plans to be commercially available in early 1995. This
facility is included in EPA's commercial combustion capacity estimate. However, EPA
will continue to monitor the facility's availability and will adjust its future capacity
estimates accordingly. The unit has a permitted thermal capacity of 200 MMBtu/hour.
This facility will accept liquids, pumpable sludges, containerized solids, bulk solids, and
soils.
USPCI did not burn wastes in 1993. Factors assumed in estimating hazardous
waste burning capacity were provided as confidential business information, including
hourly average waste feed rate, and maximum practical burning capacities. These
estimates are included in the aggregated C8I estimate presented in Exhibit 2-2. USPCI
intends to accept K088 wastes.
* * * WORKING DRAFT - January 3, 1995 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: USPCI
Clive, Utah
Contact Name: - Shem Monson
Telephone Number (801) 595-4400
Fax Number. (801) 595-4461
Date: 10/11/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Mr. Monson verbally confirmed that the facility cannot accept K088 wastes for the "short
term." .
-------
TELEPHONE LOG
Company Name: Heartland Cement Company
Independence, Kansas
Contact Name: Bill Bertie
Telephone Number: (316)331-0200
Fax Number Unknown
Date: 10/12/95
ICF Contact Name: Alex Turchi
Mr. Bertie verbally confirmed that the facility can/will accept K088 wastes. At present, '•
Rineco of Arkansas is managing the kiln operations. They are only using liquid fuel. Heartland's
solid waste system is on standby.
-------
APPENDIX D
ADDITIONAL DATA SUPPORTING THE K088 CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-------
Table 1, "1993 K088 Generation Data Extracted from the BRS," provides information on
the generation and management of K088 wastes in 1993.l The table includes the name, EPA
ID, quantity, origin, source, waste form, and current management of each K088 waste stream
included in the BRS. The quantities provided include any waste stream containing the K088
waste code. Therefore, any mixtures of K088 with another hazardous waste are included. In
addition, these quantities include both primary waste (i.e., waste generated from a
manufacturing process) and secondary waste (i.e., waste generated from treatment or
recycling of a hazardous waste).
Table 2, "1993 K088 Primary Generation Data Extracted from the BRS," provides
information on the primary K088 wastestreams. The capacity analysis for K088 wastes only
considers primary generation (i.e., wastes that are generated from a manufacturing or clean-up
process, not wastes derived from treatment of a hazardous waste) and determines whether
there is adequate capacity for these wastes.2 Of this quantity, approximately 5,200 tons are
assumed to be wastewaters3, and the remaining 95,800 tons are assumed to be
nonwastewaters.
The attached October 25, 1994 letter from Reynolds Metals Company to Benji Carroll,
Capacity Programs Branch, U.S. EPA provides information on Reynolds' Gum Springs
treatment facility.
1 The information about both generation and management is taken from the "CM" form of the BRS, which is
completed by the generator of the hazardous waste in question (rather than from the " WR" form which is
completed by the facility that manages the hazardous waste) to avoid any double counting.
2 Because secondary generation results from the management of primary wastestreams and management practices
are likely to change as a result of the LDRs, secondary wastes may not be generated once the LDRs are in place.
Thus, the capacity analysis does not include them. However, the capacity analysis does consider whether the
treatment technologies to which the primary wastes are assigned generate any treatment residuals that may require
additional treatment. If there are residuals requiring additional treatment, the capacity analysis also assigns those
residuals to a treatment technology and assesses whether there is adequate capacity for them. Finally, as in shown
in Table 1, the majority of secondary K088 wastestreams (those where the origin is "Residual") are generated at
commercial hazardous waste management facilities. These wastestreams are mixtures of K088 and numerous
other waste codes and are not likely to require additional treatment to meet LDRs.
3 The BRS does not indicate whether a waste is a wastewater or non-wastewater. Therefore, we are assuming that
any wastes with the form "organic liquids" or "inorganic liquids" are wastewaters.
-------
Table 1:1993 K088 Generate., Data Extracted from the BRS
Facility Name
Reynolds Metals Company-Alloys Plant
Reynolds Metals Co Gum Springs Pit
Reynolds Metals Co Gum Springs Pit
Reynolds Metals Co Gum Springs Pit
Tri-State Steel Drum Inc
Alcoa- Warrick Operations
Alcoa- Warrick Operations .
Nsa, Division Of Soulhwire Company
Nsa, Division Of Southwire Company
Alcan Ingot, Sebree Aluminum Plant
Alcan Ingot, Sebree Aluminum Plant
Chemical Waste Management
Chemical Waste Management
Chemical Waste Management
Eastalco Aluminium Co.
Noranda Aluminum Incorporated
Noranda Aluminum Incorporated.
Waterways. Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Columbia Falls Aluminum Co.
Columbia Falls Aluminum Co.
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America .
Aluminum Company Of America
E. 1. Dupont - Chambers Works
E. 1. Dupont - Chambers Works
E. 1. Dupont • Chambers Works
EPA ID
ALD095687679
ARD006354161
ARD006354161
ARD006354161
GAD033842543
IND006366819
IND006366819
KYD049062375
KYD049062375
KYD058692526
KYD058692526
LAD000777201
LAD000777201
LAD000777201
MDD990759375 .
MOD093750966
MOD093750966
MS6210809871
MS621 0809871
MS6210809871
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MTD057561763
MTD057561763
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
Tons*
0
74
16
17
0
0
5,258
3,090
60
2,524
604
3
14,884
25,484
3,648
580
6,203
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,826
986
758
1,951
270
179
11
4
2
1
L °
485
35,373
4
Origin
Production
Residual
Production
Production
Off-Site
Production
Production
Production
Cleanup
Production
Production
Production
Residual
Residual
Production
Production
Production
Off-Site .
Off-Site
Off-Site
Off-Site
Cleanup
Off-Site
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Cleanup
Cleanup
Residual
Residual
Production
Source
Other Remediation
Air Pollution Control Devices
Clothing/Personal Protective Equip.
Routine Cleanup Wastes
Electroplating
Clean Out Process Equip.
Clean Out Process Equip.
Other
Superfund Remedial Action
Other
Other
Laboratory Wastes
Leachate Collection
Leachate Collection
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Other
Other
Oth. One-Time/lntermrttent Proc.
Routine Cleanup Wastes
Sludge Removal
Spray Rinsing
Spray Rinsing
Rcra Corrective Action
Rcra Corrective Action
Wastewater Treatment
Wastewater Treatment
Filtering/Screening
Form
Inorganic Sludges
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Sludges
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Lab Packs
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Sludges
Inorganic Sludges
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Sludges
Organic Sludges
Inorganic- Solids
Current Management
Disposal
Disposal
Stabilization
Stabilization
Other Treatment
Disposal
Disposal
Aqueous Inorganic Treat.
Disposal
Transfer
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Incineration
Disposal
Incineration
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Disposal
Disposal
Incineration
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Stabilization
Stabilization
Aqueous Inorganic Treat.
Stabilization
Disposal
Sludge Treatment
Disposal
Disposal
Off-site Manager"
OKD065438376
OKD065438376
OKD065438376
ALD000622464 -
IND093219012
IND078911146
IND078911146
IND093219012
IMD078911146
ARD006354161
TXD000761254
TXD000838896
IND078911146
ARD006354161
OKD065438376
LAD01 03951 27
MOD980962B49
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
IDD0731 14654
ORD089452353
ARD006354161
IND078911146
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
IND093219012
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
Not all information is available for all waste streams.
are rounded to the nearest ton. Zeros indicate a quantity greater than zero tons, buHess than 0.5 tons.
«v><-> ««.eito mnnnoer Blanks indicate on-site management.
-------
Table 1:1993 K088 Generation Data Extracted from the EPS
Facility Name
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
E. . Dupont - Chambers Works
Aluminum Cornpary Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer,. Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Reynolds Metals Company/St Lawrence Pint
Reynolds Metals Company/St Lawrence Pint
Ormet Corporation
Ormet Corporation
Ormet Corporation
Northwest Aluminum Company
Alcoa Technical Center
Alcoa Technical Center
Alumax Of South Carolina Inc
Alumax Of South Carolina Inc
Aluminum Company Of America-South Plant
Aluminum Company Of America-South Plant
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
EPA ID
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD0023B5730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304 '
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002245967
NYD002245967
OHD004379970
OHD004379970
OHD004379970
ORD981 764707
PAD004393138
PAD004393138
SCD097366165
SCD097366165
TND003383551
TND003383551
TXD000761254
TXD000761254
TXD000761254
TXD000761254
Tons*
3
3
143
44
44
30
174
287
19
783
1.355
6
1,360
0
2
321
224
6
13
95
0
1,654
2,946
1,470
4,408
175
5,760
0
0
1,342
9
719
3,015
8,450
0
6
275
Origin
Production
Production
Production
Residual
Residual
Production
Residual
Residual
Residual
Production
Production
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Production .
Production
Production
Production
Production
Residual
Production
Residual
Residual
Source
Filtering/Screening
Oth. Pollution Control/Waste Treat.
Oth. Pollution Control/Waste Treat.
Incineration/Thermal Treat.
Incineration/Thermal Treat.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Incineration/Thermal Treat.
Incineration/Thermal Treat. .
Incineration/Thermal Treat.
By-Product Processing
By-Product Processing
Other Remediation
Other Remediation
Other Remediation
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Other Processes
Other Processes
Other
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Spray Rinsing
Laboratory Wastes
Oth. Pollution Control/Waste Treat.
Tank Sludge Removal
Form
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Liquids
Organic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Orgrnic Liquids
Organic Liquids
Inorganic Sludges
Current Management
Disposal
Sludge Treatment
Disposal
Sludge Treatment
Disposal
Disposal
Sludge Treatment
Disposal
Incineration
Disposal
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Incineration
Disposal
Disposal ~
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Transfer
Incineration
Disposal
•
Disposal
Metals Recovery
Disposal
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Transfer
Incineration
Incineration
Off-site Manager**
TXD055141378
ArCOt-oSEJli?'
ALD000622464
IND093219012
NJD002385730
NJD0023B5730
UTD981552177
IND078911146
NVT330010000
NYD049836679
OHD045243706
UTD991301748
MND981 190242
ARD006354161
NYD049836679
IND078911146
OHD045243706
OKD065438376
ORD08b452353
PAD002390961
MAD980523203
IND078911146
SCD070375985
ARD006354161
IND078911146
ALD000622464
TXD000838896
TXD000838896
Not all information is available for all waste streams. . • . .
'Quantities are rounded to the nearest ton. Zeros indicate a quantity greater than zero tons,- but loss than u.5 tons.
**FPft in of the otf-site manager. Blanks indicate on-site management.
-------
Table 1:1993 K088 Generate., Data Extracted from the BRS
Facility Name
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Rockdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Rockdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Rockdale Operations/Aluminum Co Of Amer
Rockdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Aluminum Company Of America
Uspci - Grassy. Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci • Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
-------
Table 2:1993 K088 Primary Gen&idtion Data Extracted from the BRS
Facility Name
Reynolds Metals Company-Alloys Plant
Reynolds Metals Co Gum Springs Pit
Reynolds Metals Co Gum Springs Pit
Tri-State Steel Drum Inc
Alcoa- Warrick Operations
Alcoa- Warrick Operations
Nsa, Division Of Southwire Company
Nsa, Division Of Southwire Company
Alcan Ingot, Sebree Aluminum Plant
Alcan Ingot, Sebree Aluminum Plant
Chemical Waste Management
Eastalco Aluminium Co.
Noranda Aluminum Incorporated
Noranda Aluminum Incorporated
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Waterways Experiment Station
Columbia Falls Aluminum Co.
Columbia Falls Aluminum Co.
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
Aluminum Company Of America
E. I. Dupont - Chambers Works
E. I. Dupont - Chambers Works
E. I. Dupont - Chambers Works
E. I: Dupont - Chambers Works
E. I. Dupont - Chambers Works
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
'EPA ID
ALD095687679
ARD006354161
ARD006354161
GAD033842543
IND006366819
IND006366819
KYD049062375
KYD049062375
KYD058692526
KYD05869252S
LAD000777201
MDD990759375
MOD093750966
MOD093750966
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MS621 0809871
MTD057561763
MTD057561763
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD003162542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NCD0031 62542
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
NYD002232304
Tons*
0
16
17
0
0
5,258
3,090
60
2,524
604
3
3,648
580
6,203
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.826
986
758
1,951
270
179
11
4
2
1
0
4
3
3
143
30
783
Origin
Production
Production
Production
Off-Site
Production
Production
Production
Cleanup
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Off-Site
Off-Site
Off-Site
Off-Site
Cleanup
Off-Site
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Cleanup
Cleanup
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Source
Other Remediation
Clothing/Personal Protective Equip.
Routine Cleanup Wastes
Electroplating
Clean Out Process Equip.
Clean Out Process Equip.
Other
Superfund Remedial Action
Other
Other
Laboratory Wastes'
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Other
Other
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Routine Cleanup Wastes .
Sludge Removal
Spray Rinsing
Spray Rinsing
Rcra Corrective Action
Rcra Corrective Action
Filtering/Screening
Filtering/Screening
Oth. Pollution Control/Waste Treat.
Oth. Pollution Control/Waste Treat.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
By-Product Processing
Form
Inorganic SJudges
inorganic. Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Sludges
Organic Solids
Organic Solids .
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Lab Packs
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids •
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Sludges
Inorganic Sludges
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Current Management
Disposal
Stabilization
Stabilization
Other Treatment
Disposal
Disposal
Aqueous Inorganic Treat.
Disposal
Transfer
Disposal.
Disposal
Incineration
Disposal
Incineration
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer .
Disposal
Disposal
Incineration .
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Stabilization
Stabilization
Aqueous Inorganic Treat.
Stabilization
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Sludge Treatment
Disposal
Disposal
Incineration
Off-site Manager**
OKD065438376
OKD065438376
ALD000622464
IND093219012
IND078911146
IND078911146
IND093219012
IND078911146
ARDOOM54I61
.
IND078911146.
ARD006354161
OKD065438376
LAD01 03951 27
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
MOD980962849
IDD0731 14654
ORD089452353
ARD006354161
IND078911146
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
ALD000622464 -
IND093219012
ALD000622464
ALD000622464
ARD006354161
Not all information is available for all waste streams.
•Quantities are rounded to the nearest ton. Zeros indicate a quantity greater than zero tons, but less thun 0.5 tons.
in of th« off-site manaaer. Blanks indicate on-site management.
-------
Table 2:1993 K088 Primary Genb.uiion Data Extracted from the BRS
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Op'e
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Amer, Massena Ope
Aluminum Company Of Arm'. Massena Ope
Reynolds Metals Company/St Lawrence Pint
Reynolds Metals Company/St Lawrence Pint
Ormet Corporation
Ormet Corporation -
Ormet Corporation
Northwest Aluminum Company
Alcoa Technical Center
Alcoa Technical Center
Alumax Of South Carolina Inc
Alumax Of South Carolina Inc
Aluminum Company Of America-South Plant
Aluminum Company Of America-South Plant
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Chemical Waste Management Inc.
Ffockdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Ffockdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Rochdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Rockdale Operations/Aluminum Co. Of Amer
Aluminum Company Of America
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Uspci - Grassy Mountain Facility
Kaiser Aluminum Mead Works
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002232304
NYD002245967
NYD002245967
OHD004379970
OHD004379970
OHD004379970
ORD981 764707
PAD004393138
PAD004393138
SCD097366165
SCD097366165 .
TND003383551
TND003383551
TXD000761254
TXD000761254
TXD000761254
TXD000761254
TXD008091712
TXD008091712
TXD008091712
TXD008091712
TXD008123168
UTD991301748
UTD991301748
UTD991301748
UTD991301748
UTD991301748
WAD000065508
1,355
6
1.360
0
2
321
224
6
- 13
95
0
1,654
2,946
1,470
4,408
175
5,760
0
0
1,342
9
719
3,015
0
1
0
6
486
623
3,527
6,620
2
0
262
2
1
12
819
Production
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Cleanup
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Cleanup
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
By-Product Processing
Other Remediation
Other Remediation
Other Remediation
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Discontinue Process Equip.
Other Processes
Other Processes
Other
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Cleanup Of Spill Residues
Laboratory Wastes
Air Pollution Control Devices
Physical Scraping/Removal
Physical Scraping/Removal
Leachate Collection
Physical Scraping/Removal
Other
Other
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Laboratory Wastes
Organic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Liquids
Organic Liquids
Organic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Organic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids .
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Liquids
Inorganic Solids
Disposal
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Incineration
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Disposal
Transfer
Incineration
Disposal
Disposal
Metals Recovery
Disposal
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Aqueous Inorg/Org Treat.
Disposal
Disposal .
Transfer
Incineration
Incineration
Disposal
Transfer
Other Treatment
Disposal
Disposal
Transfer
Disposal
Stabilization
Stabilization
Transfer
ALD000622464
IND093219012
NJD002385730
NJD002385730
UTD981552177
IND078911146
NVT330010000
NYD049836679
OHD045243706
UTD991301748
MND9e^90?'2
ARD006354161
NYD049836679
IND078911146
OHD045243706
OKD065438376
ORD089452353
PAD002390961
MAD980523203
IND078911146
SCD070375985
ARD006354161
IND078911146
ALD000622464
TXD000838896
TXDOOOB38896
TXD999999998
TXD988032785
TXD999999998
LAD000777201
TXD000761254
ORD089452353
Not all information is available for all waste streams.
are rounded to the nearest ton. Zeros indicate a quantity greater than zero tons, but less than 0.5 tons.
f the off-site manager. Blanks indicate on-site management.
-------
Table 2:1993 K088 Primary Geneiation Data Extracted from the BRS
Kaiser Aluminum Mead Works
Kaiser Aluminum Mead Works
Kaiser Aluminum - Tacoma Works
Alcoa - Wenatchee Works
Alcoa - Wenatchee Works
Intalco Aluminum Corp
Intalco Aluminum Corp
Intalco Alum.inum Corp
Reynolds Metals Co
Reynolds Metals Co
Vanaln, Inc
Columbia Aluminum Corporation
Columbia Aluminum Corporation
Ravenswood Aluminum Corporation
Ravenswood Aluminum Corporation
Total Generation •
WAD000065508
WAD000065508
WAD001 882984
WAD009270794
WAD009270794
WAD009488131
WAD009488131
WAD009488131
WAD057068561
WAD057068561
WAD981 766751
WAD990828642
WAD990828642
WVD009233297
WV0009233297
22
2,518
3.929
732
3,696
382
217
166
2,780
5,059
3,014
3,872
3,872
2,304
2,304
101,065
Production
Production
Production
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Oth. One-Time/Intermittent Proc.
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Organic Solids
Organic Sludges
Organic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Inorganic Solids
Other Recovery
Disposal
Disposal
Other Recoveiv
Transfer
Disposal
Disposal
WAD981 766751
ORD089452353
ORD089452353
ARD006354161
ORD089452353
ARD006354161
ORD089452353
ORD08945P353
NYD049836679
OHD045243706
Not all information is available for all waste streams.
'Quantities are rounded to.the nearest ton. Zeros indicate a quantity greater than zero tons, but less than 0.5 tons.
«*t=pa in M tho <-v«-site rnannner. Blanks indicate on-site management.
-------
REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY
P.O. Box 27003 • Richmond, Virginia 23261-7003
October 25, 1994
Benji Carroll '
Capacity Programs Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Waterside Mall
401 M Street, S.W.
Mail Code: 5302W '
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Ms. Carroll, .. ^
RE: Request for Information on Reynolds Metals Gum Springs Plant
Attached per your request, is a information related to spent potliner treatment at our
Gum Springs Plant in Gum Springs, Arkansas.
The Gum Springs Plant has a capacity for treating 120,000 tons of spent potliner and is
open to all generators of spent potliner. Reynolds has verified 15 shipping locations
representing 7 companies.
If you have any questions or comments please, contact me at (804) 281-3952.
Sincerely yours,
Douglas D. Macauley
Manager, Environmental Remediation
attachments
-------
10/06/94 11:31 FAX 501 246 7344 RMC-GUM SPRINGS ^002/003
Sept. 29, 1994
GUM SPRINGS PLANT
SPENT POTLINER STATISTICS
1. Industry Generation - see attached. The first column is historical data gathered
from the producers as of mid 1993 and reflects estimated SPL generation at the
smelter rated capacity. The second column is most recent data gathered from the
producers and reflects the effect of capacity curtailments at some locations. Actual
SPL generation varies according to reline schedules but the general trend is toward
lower total generation as the industry continues to improve pot life.
2. Gum Springs plant began operations in August - October 1993 and through August
of 1994 had received 33,100 tons of SPL. 30,000 tons had been treated, with
inventory gain, free metal recovery and baghouse dust disposal being the
difference.
3. The Gum Springs plant is rated at 120,000 tons per year of SPL treatment capacity.
4. The Gum Springs plant treatment fee varies, being higher for customer initial
verification than for normal treatment, and also depends on the term of the
individual customer treatment contract. The range for the service is expected to be
$200 - $500 per ton-treated, FOB Gum Springs plant in approved containers.
5. Gum Springs has verified 15 shipping locations representing 7 customers; 'one
additional customer;is currently accumulating material for a 700 ton, 4 day
verification test with 484 tons on site.
All primary locations on the attachment have been contacted and Reynolds has
made offers to conduct the required verification testing and to treat current
generation, upon successful verification.
There are 11 locations, excluding Alcan Canada locations^ which remain to be
verified. ;
6. Gum Springs is permitted to treat all K088 wastes generated from the pot relining
process. The incoming material must be shipped in special containers as described
in the attachment. Additional limitations concerning acceptable chemical analysis,
particle size and contamination are described in the attachments. The shipping
location is responsible for freight, containers and meeting all necessary regulations
concerning the transportation of K088 to Gum Springs plant.
-------
10/06/94 11:53 FAi. 301 246 7344 RMOGCM SPRINGS 3005/00.8
ATTACHMENT I
Spent Potliner shall be free of foreign materials that would
not normally be expected to be found in .spent potliner generated
from the aluminum reduction process, including/ without
limitation, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxin, asbestos, pitch,
collector bars, or pieces of aluminum; other toxic materials in
excess of those normally produced in the reduction process; or
any other materials that could adversely affect the operations of
the Plant, pose a threat to the Plant or its employees, cause
residual contamination of the Plant or pose a threat to the
environment.
Spent Potliner shall be sized as small as possible, so as to
allow passage through a 12-inch square opening into the crushing
system of the Plant.
The typical chemical analysis of the Spent Potliner shall be
in the range listed below:
Carbon 15 - 50%
F 10 - 25%
•
Na 10-25%
Al 5 - 25%
Si 1 - 15%
CN 0 - 10,000 mg/Kg (total cyanide)
-------
LO/06/94 n:53 FAJt 501 246 7344 RMC-GL'M SPRINGS 2)006/008
ATTACHMENT III
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
FOR
SPENT POTLINER SHIPPING CONTAINER
SCOPE: ' . .
Pro.vide intermodel roll-off containers for transporting spent
potliner by rail or truck.
/
POTLINER DESCRIPTION: . . .
Spent potliner is a hazardous waste from the aluminum industry
consisting primarily of carbon, it will be shipped dry with
sizing ranging from dust to 12" pieces. Design densities are 100
pcf for structural design and 78 pcf for design capacity.
CONTAINER SPECIFICATIONS:
«K-^M^^_M^^H^_MM-«l-^HV^«I^HMiM^HK^^VIM^B^"«KBBW^BHIM^MMM •
• Std. ISO container with outside dimensions of 238-172" X 96".
Corner post height to be 72".
• Design capacity: Approx. 20 tons.
• Material or construction: Mild steel.
• Floor: One piece 1/4" plate with min. 3 x 3 x 3/16" channel
> supports spaced to reduce floor deformation due to large
pieces of potliner being dropped into container.
• Walls: Min. 7 ga plate.
• Corner posts:. Steel tubing with standard ISO top and bottom'
corner castings.
• Rear door: .Top hinged with fully perimeter SBR type or
approved equal extruded gasket.
• Rear wheels: Min. 6" dia. retractable wheel.
• Fork tubes: Must accommodate 12" x 5" forks.
• Top cover: One piece roll-off aluminum or fiberglass covers
designed to roll off either side of container by one person.
• Certified by a professional engineer to meet all applicable
requirements as specified in the American Association of
Railroads Specification M-930-90.
• Pass a Union Pacific Impact Test tor double stacked
containers. (Four containers per car).
-------
10/06/94 LI: 54 F.\I 501.248 7344 RMOGLM SPRINGS
J2007.-003
• Pass-a Union Pacific Impact Test for single stacked
containers. (Three containers per car). .
• Containers to have mountings for placards.
• Containers to have serial number and "tare weight stenciled on
two sides of the container with min. 3" letter size.
• Complete list of spare parts.
• Venting to be provided at top of each end of container.
Twelve square inches/ minimum at each end.
• Provide estimated weight with and without top.
• Interbox connectors will be provided to vendor prior to
container shipment.
• Submit a complete set of container drawings.
• Container to have min. 6" x 3" x 1/2" steel box for radio
freq. device. Vendor to mount device in container. Customer
to furnish and program.
• Container top and end door to have the ability -to be locked.
A • ' - .
-------
10/08/94 11:54 FAX 501 246 7344 RMOGUM SPRINGS 3005-00%
ATTACHMENT IV
WEIGHING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES
FOR . .
INCOMING SPENT POTLINER
Spent Potliner will arrive at the Facility by railroad cars in
specially constructed containers and wil-1 be off-loaded using a -
fork truck. The fork truck will transport the container of Spent
Potliner to the receiving area where if will be weighed using
platform scales and, using the container tare weight, a net
weight of Spent Potliner obtained. This net weight must agree
within ten percent of the manifest weight in order for the
container and its contents to be accepted. A visual inspection
will be made to insure that the material in the containers is
Spent Potliner and only Spent Potliner. If accepted, the
container will go to the container storage area to await
processing.
When a container's Spent Potliner is ready to be placed into the
system, a tilt platform will be used to transfer the material to
a feed bin connected to a 60-inch conveyor belt. At this point,
the material will be visually inspected and chunks of metal, if
present, will be removed. The material will then be crushed to
reduce its-size to minus 3/4-inch. As it is conveyed to the
crushed storage area, the Spent Potliner will be automatically
sampled using a Ramsey Sampler that .will take a 1.2 kilogram
"cut" four to six times per hour. The individual "cuts" will be
composited into four, one kilogram, six-hour samples that will be
taken to the analytical laboratory for further compositing into a
one kilogram sample that represents a 24-hour production "run".
A record as to which containers were used during the 24-hour
period will be maintained automatically as the containers are
placed on the tilting platform. It will be possible to collect a
sample at shorter intervals, thereby grouping a lesser number cf
containers, but it is not intended to sample individual
containers.
During the early life of the Facility, crushed Spent Potliner
samples will be collected and analyzed from each source of Sper.-.
Potliner. This information will be "evaluated for future blendIT..J
of kiln feed to achieve maximum productivity.
-------
-------
10/06.94 ii:52 FAX 301 246 7344 RMC-GL'M SPRINGS ' 2j 003/008
jiiigei
GSP Statistics
7. Gum Springs is permitted to inventory up to 252 full containers on the plant site.
Additionally, the plant has capacity to store up to approximately 3,000 tons of
crushed SPL in our unprocessed inventory containment room.
8. Gum Springs plant intends to develop recycling applications for the delisted treated
SPL residue output from the plant. A 10 year agreement was signed with JTM
Industries, Inc. in June 1993 giving JTM exclusive marketing privileges for the
product for the term of the agreement. Market development was anticipated to take
two years. JTM has been active, with full cooperation of Reynolds resources, to
proceed with the market development activities. While most of the plant's output
so far has gone to GSP's on-site Class III permitted landfill, some material has been
used for testing structural fill applications, filler for asphalt wear surface material
and for production of load-bearing hollow core masonry units. Additional testing is
underway or planned before year end for applications in the steel industry, cement
industry and for specialty concrete shapes.
The treated kiln residue product has been given the trademark ALROC™ which is
registered to JTM and appropriate MSDS has been developed for the product.
Market research so far indicates excellent potential to consume the plant's rated
output in environmentally safe recycling applications. As shipments from the plant
reach commercial scale volumes, JTM plans to reclaim material already placed in
the landfill, and anticipates using the landfill capacity as an inventory tool to isolate
plant output generation rate from variability in market demand.
-------
10/06/94 11:52 FAX 501 246 7344
RMC-GL'M SPRINGS
2004/003
(Mid 1993 Data)
SPL Generated at Capacity
Tons/Year
10:65 .AM'-,.
10/6/94.-™" i%
(September
1995
-r ,v ~-~~ "'^~-JW'
Jons/Year- $ •$<&
Reynolds
Massena
Longview
Troutdale
Bale Comeau
Alcoa
Warrick
Massena
Badin
Alcoa, TN
Rockdale
Wenatchee
Noranda
NSA
Alcan Sebree
Ormet
Eastalco Alumax
Mt. Holly Alumax
Intalco Alumax
Lauralco Alumax
Ravenswood '
"Columbia Falls
Northwest
Vanalco
Kaiser Mead
Kaiser Tacoma
Columbia
Alcan Quebec
Alouette
Alcan Kitimat
ABI
Totals
US.
4,500
8,200
3.500
Canada
16,200
8,560
2,060
2,320
5,000
11,000
2,200
31,140
8,100
3,230
3,600
8,100
5,670
4,000
7,000
5,100
5,400
2,250
3,030
7,700
2,850
4,630
70,660
10,350
10,350
5,500
118,000
5,500
25,000
5,500
N.A.
9.280
39,780
55,630
.US
4,500
7,800
N.A.
12,300
Canada
10.350
10,350
4,020
2,880
3,080
2,160
4,950
2,160
19,250
9,000
2,500
2,040
7,000
3,600
2,000
4,500
4,500
5,400
3,000 - 4,000
2,500
3,750 - 5,000
2,250 - 3,000
6,000 - 7,000
58,040 - 62,040
,
;•'?- ..c; "
> .
\
5,500
5.500
30.000
1.50O
9 OOO
5.505
46 005
89,590 - 93.590
61.855
-------
o
-------
APPENDIX E
WASTEWATER AND NON-WASTEWATER QUANTITIES
OF D003 WASTES (1993 BRS)
-------
t-J
Wastewater and Non-Wastewater Quantities of U003 Wastes (1993 BRS)
System Type
Unknown
Metals Recovery
Sol-. :.-us Recovery
Other Recovery
'
Incineration
Energy Recovery
Fuel Blending
Aqueous Inorganic Treatment
Aqueous Inorganic Treatment
cont'd
Aqueous Organic Treatment
System Description
Unknown
High-temp Metals Recovery
Secondary Smelting
Other Specified Recovery
Unknown Metals Recovery
Fractionation / Distillation
Unknown Solvents Recovery
Acid Regeneration
Other Specified Recovery
Unknown Other Recovery
Liquids
Sludges
Solids
Gases
Unknown Incineration
Liquids
Sludges
Solids
Fuel Blending
Chrome reduction followed by chemical precipitation
Cyanide destruction followed by chemical precipitation
Cyanide destruction only
Chemical oxidation followed by chemical precipitation
Chemical oxidation only
Wet air oxidation
Chemical precipitation
Other specified aqueous inorganic treatment
Unknown aqueous inorganic treatment
Biological treatment
Wastewater
Generated (tons)
7
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,636
0
0
0
0
0
0
119
0
0
415,777
, 146,587
18,873
391
81
56,322
37
38
420
Non-Wastewater
Generated (tons)
335
15
0
1,130
86
0
0
0
87
223
2,232
90
1,107
15
745
3
111
1
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1)
Total Generated
(tons)
342
16
0
1,134
87
0
0
0
87
224
5,867
90
1,108
15
745
3
111
120
44
0
415,777
146,587
18,873
391
81
56,322
37
38
420
-------
Wastewater and Non-Wastewater Quantities of D003 Wastes (1993 BRS)
System Type
,,<...
Aqueous Organic and
Inorganic Treatment
Sludge Treatment
Stabilization
Other Treatment
Disposal
Transfer Facility Storage
Unknown
System Description
Other specified aqueous organic treatment
Unknown aqueous organic treatment
Chemical precipitation in combination with biological
treatment
Chemical precipitation in combination with carbon
adsorption
Wet air oxidation'
Other specified organic / inorganic treatment
Unknown aqueous organic and inorganic treatment
Sludge, dewatering
Addition of excess lime
Stabilization / Chemical fixation using cementitious and /
or pozzolanic materials
Other specified stabilization
Unknown stabilization
Neutralization only
Evaporation only
Phase separation only /
Other specified treatment
Other unknown treatment
Landfill
Deepwell / underground injection
Direct discharge to sewer / POTW (no prior treatment)
Other specified disposal
Transfer facility storage, waste was shipped off-site with
no on-site TDR activity
M152
M999
Totals
Wastewater
Generated (tons)
22,404
0
0
0
791
0
84
0
0
0
0
0
502
14
48,589
13,989
33
0
2,210,670
10,654
0
14
0
4
2,950,042
Non-Wastewater
Generated (tons)
0
0
0
0
0
. 0 .
0
1,668
0
290
59
43
0
0
0
0
0
648
0
0
17,593
741
0
569
27,837
Total Generated
(tons)
22,404
0
0
0
791
0
84
1,668
0
290
59
43
502
14
48,589
13,989
33
648
2,210,670
10,654
17,593
755
0
573
2,977,879
-------
APPENDIX F
CASE STUDY REPORT FOR CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF LDR PHASE III
DECHARACTERIZED WASTEWATER
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Under the proposed Phase III Land Disposal Restrictions, EPA would defer end-of-pipe
standards for underlying hazardous constituents (UHC) iri decharacterized wastewaters to
limitations in CWA or CWA-equi'yalent permits. For purposes of this Case Study Report,
attention is focused on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) limits where
the facility's NPDES permit addresses the UHCs. Facilities which generate ignitable, corrosive,
reactive, or toxic (ICRT) wastes which are decharacterized and are managed in Clean Water Act
(CWA) or CWA-equivalent surface impoundments must either address those UHCs under their
NPDES permit or meet the universal treatment standards (UTS) under the Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDR). Facilities that do not have UHCs in their existing NPDES permit may elect
to modify that permit to address additional constituents as an alternative to regulation under the
LDR. In order to better understand how facilities will be affected by the implementation of these
proposed rules this document provides: (1) a review of technical procedures underlying the
developing NPDES effluent limitations; (2) a review of permit development and modification
procedures; and (3) an analysis to assess the overlap between industrial NPDES permits and the
UTS using Permit Compliance System (PCS) data and several case studies.
Effluent limitations may be based on either technology or water quality considerations. At
this time, effluent limitation guidelines (ELG) which are technology-based have been promulgated
for 51 industry categories. Where ELG have been promulgated, the permit writer must start with
the limitations specified for that industry. In addition the permit writer must consider any
applicable water quality based standards for the receiving water body. If water quality-based
standards, after considering facility and stream flows, are more stringent than technology-based
limitations, then the water quality-based limitations must be developed and included in the permit.
The permitting process begins with a facility submitting a NPDES permit application. The
application identifies constituents expected to be present in the outfall based on industry testing
requirements. This information is used by the permit writer to develop the NPDES permit.
Permit writers often rely heavily on the chemical analyses submitted in the permit applications.
These data provide the permit writer with a starting point for identifying parameters of concern
which is then augmented by reviewing of plant operations and raw materials. These chemical
analyses consider a wide array of chemicals, many of which are UHC. There are, however, a
number of constituents which have UTS which are not considered under these analytical
requirements. Once a permit is issued, the permitting authority or the facility may seek to modify
the permit based on scenarios agreed to in the permit. There are established procedures and
schedules for NPDES permit modifications however permit writing authorities are typically under
staffed and operate with significant backlogs. State officials indicated that a significant increase
in the number of industrial facilities requesting permit modifications as a result of the Phase III
LDR would have a significant adverse impact on the state's permitting activities. States which
have undertaken a watershed-based approach to issuing permits may have particular difficulty in
redirecting resources to address individual modification requests'.
Based on interviews with permitting authorities for South Carolina and West Virginia
-------
A review of KPDES permit monitoring data indicates that, for many affected industries, a
significant portion of contaminants with UTS as designated under the LDR are controlled under
the CWA. Analyses of the PCS suggest that an application of ICRT waste characterization
knowledge by the facility, would reduce the number of newly controlled UTS contaminants to a
very few per facility. This point is illustrated in several case studies. Under this scenario many
facilities may modify their NPDES permits to add those few contaminants rather than meet the
LDR end-of-pipe treatment standards. However, these modification requests may require a year
or more to be processed.
-------
A REVIEW OF THE NPDES PROGRAM WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON RULES
AND PROCESSES WHICH MAY INTERACT WITH LDR PHASE IH
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program is authorized by
Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and is implemented through the 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Parts 122 through 124. Other parts of the CFR affecting the NPDES program
include:
40 CFR Part 125 (technology-based standards);
• 40 CFR Part 129 (toxic pollutant standards);
• 40 CFR Part 130 (water quality management plans);
40 CFR Part 131 (water quality-based standards);
40 CFR Part 133 (sewage secondary treatment regulations);
40 CFR Part 135 (citizen suits);
40 CFR Part 136 (analytical procedures);
40 CFR Part 257 (sludge disposal regulations);
40 CFR Part 401 (general effluent guidelines provisions);
40 CFR Part 403 (general pretreatment regulations);
40 CFR Part 405-471 (effluent limitation guidelines);
40 CFR Part 501 (sludge permitting requirements); and
40 CFR Part 503 (sewage sludge disposal standards).
If a facility discharges pollutants from any point source (e.g., the end-of-pipe) into
navigable waters, then the operator of that facility must submit an application requesting a
discharge permit to the NPDES permitting authority. Once issued, the permit functions as a
license to discharge a specified amount of pollutants under certain conditions into U. S. waters.
The permit is drafted and issued either by an EPA Region or by an NPDES authorized State or
Territory. States and Territories may obtain the authority to issue NPDES permits by meeting
certain technical, administrative, and legal requirements. Currently, not all States or Territories
with authority to implement the basic NPDES program (i.e., municipal and industrial) have
approval for all program categories (i.e.. Federal facilities, pretreatment, general permits, and
municipal sewage sludge). Once the permit is issued to a facility, the permit is enforced through
a combination of self monitoring (requirements in the permit) and compliance monitoring.
Under 40 CFR 268 the Agency has promulgated Land Disposal Restriction (LDR)
treatment standards which, for characteristic wastes, require the removal of that characteristic and
the treatment of any other identified hazardous constituents prior to land disposal. Under Phase
III LDR, the Agency is proposing to revise these standards to apply to wastewaters subject to
treatment under the CWA which were not previously subject to the LDR. The Phase III LDR
proposed rule, in cases where there are both a RCRA treatment standard and a CWA standard for
a constituent, defers the RCRA treatment standard to CWA under specified conditions. The
Phase III LDR rule states that "decharacterized wastes managed in surface impoundments whose
discharge is regulated under the Clean Water Act (CWA), or that are zero-dishcargers that
engage in CWA-equivalent treatment before ultimate land disposal, must meet end-of-pipe LDR
-------
F-2
treatment standards for any underlying hazardous constituent reasonably expected to be present,
unless the underlying constituent is covered under a CWA permit, a CWA permit application, or a
Fundamentally Different Factors variance under 40 CFR part 125.30-32." 2 In order to comply
with these new rules, facilities which manage ICRT wastes in surface impoundments may take
advantage of this deferral to CWA. Under these scenarios, it is anticipated that industrial facilities
will seek expansion of their NPDES permits to include otherwise uncontrolled UTS constituents
in order to minimize the costs of compliance.
This report examines several of the issues associated with deferment .to CWA controls and
is organized in three sections which: 1) discuss the technical basis for the development of effluent
limitations under the NPDES program; 2) discuss the NPDES permitting process, specific how
pollutants are identified and permitted, and the processes for modifying'existing permits; and 3)
evaluates the extent to which existing permits address hazardous constituents using case studies
of several affected industrial facilities to assess, qualitatively, the impact of the Phase III LDR rule
regarding deferment to CWA.
1 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS 3
Effluent limitations are central to the NPDES permit. These limitations are written into
the permit and may be based on either technology or water quality considerations. Effluent
limitations for industrial discharges are developed by three methods:
• Technology-based Effluent Limitation Guidelines
• Technology-based Best Professional Judgment
• Water Quality_-based Considerations ~
Technology-based permit limits for industrial facilities are derived from, effluent limitations
guidelines (ELG) or Best Professional Judgment (BPJ). In all cases, technology-based limits
represent the best available technology that is economically achievable for the industry (in the case
of ELG) or of a specific industrial facility being permitted (in the case of BPJ). Technology-based
limitations vary depending on the nature of the discharge and on the type of facility. BPJ-based
limits are technology-based limits derived on a case-by-case basis, taking into account site-specific
considerations. BPJ is used in cases where effluent limitations guidelines are not available for or
do not regulate a particular pollutant of concern.
Water quality-based limitations in permits which are more stringent limits than technology-
based effluent guidelines, are necessary in order to protect the "designated use" of the receiving
water. The permit writer must calculate both technology-based permit limits and water quality-
2 Working Draft: Final Rule Land Disposal Restrictions Phase HI -- Decharacterized Wastevvaters. Carbamate Wastes, and
Spend Potliners. 40 CFR part 268.39 (d), page 105
Unless other wise noted all information in this section is extracted from U.S. EPA, Training Manual for NPDES Permit '
Writers. EPA 833-B93-003. March 1993
-------
F-3
based permit limits for each parameter and impose the more stringent limit in the permit. Water
quality-based limits are generally more difficult to develop than effluent guidelines because they
involve a site-specific evaluation of the discharge and its effect on a receiving stream.
Contaminants for which there are water quality-based limits differ depending on state, water body
and, location within water body.
Pollutants are categorized into three groups under the ELG: conventional, toxic, and.
nonconventional. By definition, there are five conventional pollutants: 5-day biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), fecal coliform, pH, and oil and grease. There are
126 toxic or "priority" pollutants, defined in Section 307(a)(l) of the CWA. These include heavy
metals and manmade organic compounds. Nonconventional pollutants are those which do not fall
under either of the above categories and include such parameters as ammonia, nitrogen, chemical
oxygen demand, and whole effluent toxicity (WET) as well as organic compounds outside the list
of priority pollutants .
Permit writers have broad
discretion in the selection of
parameters to be included in an
individual industrial permit. Where
technology-based effluent guidelines
have been promulgated, the permit
writer must start with the parameters
specified for that industry. In addition
the permit writer must consider any
applicable water quality based
standards for the receiving water
body If water quality-based
standards, after considering facility
and stream flows, are more stringent
than technology-based limitations,
then the water quality-based
limitations must be developed and
included in the permit. This process is
presented in Exhibit 1-1.
EXHIBIT l-l
SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGY- OR WATER
QUALITY-BASED LIMITATION
Develop Technology-Bated
Effluent LJmte for All Pollutant*
of Concern
Wni Umlu Auure
Compliance with Applicable
Water Quality Standards?
Develop Water Quality-
Baaed Effluent UmKa
Yes
1
i
Include Applicable Effluent
Llmlta In NPDES Permit
Often, a permit will have limitations for parameters developed by different means.
Additionally, the limitations in a single parameter will be derived through a combination of
methods. For example, an effluent may have total suspended solids limited by effluent guidelines,
phenol limited by BPJ, ammonia by aquatic toxicity (water quality considerations), and BOD5 by
effluent guidelines for part of the year, and by water quality considerations for the remainder of
the year.
-------
F-4
1.1 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES
The CWA required all industries discharging wastes into navigable waters to achieve the
Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available (BPT) by July -1, 1977. This control
technology represents the average of the best existing wastewater treatment performance within
each industry category or subcategory. By March 31, 1989, the CWA required the application of
effluent limitations based on the best control and treatment measures that have been developed or
that are capable of being developed within the industrial category or subcategory. These effluent
limitations are as follows:
• Toxic and Nonconventional Pollutants-Application of the Best Available
Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) -
• Conventional Pollutants- Application of the Best Conventional Pollutant Control
Technology (BCT).
Specific factors, enumerated below, are required to be considered in the development of effluent
limitations guidelines and are often referred to as the Section 304(b) factors:
• For BPT requirements:
The total cost of application of technology in relation to the effluent
reduction benefits to be achieved from such application;
The age of equipment and facilities involved*;
The process employed*;
The engineering aspects of the application of various types of control
techniques*;
Process changes*; and
Non-water quality environmental impact including energy requirements*.
• For BCT requirements:
All items in the BPT requirements indicated by an asterisk (*) above;
The reasonableness of the relationship between the costs of attaining a
reduction in effluent and the effluent reduction benefits derived; and
-------
F-5
The comparison of the cost and level of reduction of such pollutants from
the discharge of publicly owned treatment works to the cost and level of
reduction of such pollutants from a class or category of industrial sources.
• For BAT requirements:
All items in the BPT requirements indicated by an asterisk (*) above; and
The cost of achieving such effluent reduction.
The effluent guidelines development process includes a rigorous study of treatment
practices within an industry. Based on an analysis of these practices, the Agency generally
promulgates limitations on a daily maximum and monthly average mass effluent per production
quantity or in selected cases on a concentration basis. 40 CFR 122.45(f) requires that all permit
limits be expressed in terms of allowable mass (in units of pounds or kilograms) of pollutant per
day. However, the permit writer may also consider the use of concentration limits to supplement
the mass limits.
At this time effluent guidelines have been promulgated for 51 industry categories.
Exhibits 1-2 and 1-3 present each of the industry categories and the contaminants controlled
under each. In Exhibit 1-3, shading indicates that effluent guidelines for the industrial category
have been established for one or more of the toxic 'and nonconventional pollutants (i.e., if effluent
guidelines limitations have been established only for conventional pollutants, the industrial
category is not shaded and not present in Exhibit 1-3).
EXHIBIT 1-2
INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES WITH EFFLUENT GUIDELINES
40 CFR Part
467
427
461
431
458
411
434
465
468
405
469
• 413
457
Industrial Category
Aluminum Forming
Asbestos manufacturing
Battery manufacturing
Biuilders1 paper and board mills
Carbon black manufacturing
Cement manufacturing
Coal Mining
Coil coating
Cop-performing -
Dairv products processing
Electrical and electronic components •. ,
Electroplating
Explosives manufacturing
-------
F-6
40 CFR Part
412
424
418
407
426
406
454
460
447
415
420
425
432
433 •-
464
436
471
421
435 -
440 *
414
446
443
45S
419
439
422
459
463
466
430
428
408
417
423
409
410
429
Industrial Category
Feedlots
Ferroalloy manufacturing
Fertilizer manufacturing
Fruits and vegetables processing
- Glass manufacturing
Grain mills manufacturing
Gum and wood chemicals manufacturing
Hospitals
Ink formulating
Inorganic chemicals
Iron and steel manufacturing
Leather tanaiop and finishing
Meat products
Metal finishing
Metal molding; and casting;
Mineral mining and processing '
Nonferrous metals forming and metal powders
Nonfetrous metals manufacturing
Chi and gas extraction
Ore mining and dressing
Organic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers
Paint formulating
Paving and roofing materials
Pesticide chemicals
Petroleum, refining
Pharmaceutical manufacturing
Phosphate manufacturing
Photographic,
Plastics molding and forming
Porcelain enameling
Pulp, paper, and paoerboard
Rubber manufacturing
Seafood processing
Soap and detergent manufacturing
Steam electric power generating
Sugar processing
TexttlemilJs
Timber products processing
-------
F-7
EXHIBIT 1-3
EFFLUENT GUIDELINES BY INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES
Priority
Pollutants
Acenaphthene
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Benzidine
Carbon
Tetrachloride
(Tetrachlorometh
ane)
Chlorobenzene
1,2,4-
Trichlorobenzene
Mcxachlorobenze
ne
1,2-
Dichloroethane
1,1,1-
Trichloroethanc
1 lexaehloroelhane
1,1-
DichkinkMhane
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467.
T
461
431
.
434
465
T
T
468
T
T
469
T
T
T
T
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
424
418
426
'
415
_
420
425
X
432
433
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
464
T
T
T
T
436
471
421
X
435
440
414
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
455
419
439
422
459
466
430
\
428
423
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P.
P
P
111)
IJ1.'
"X"- Numerical Standard, "T" - Regulated as part of total toxic organic.s(TTO), "P" -- No diseliaige in. delectable amounts
-------
F-8
Priority
Pollutants
1,1,2-
Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-
Tetrachloroctlianc
Chloroethane
Bis(2-
chloroethyl) Hther
2-Chloroelhyl
Vinyl Ether
(mixed)
2-
Chloronaphlhalen
e
2,4,6-
Trichlorophenol
Parachlorometa
Cresol
Chloroform
(Trichloromethah
e)
2-Chlorophenol
1,2-
Dichlorobenzene
1,3-
Dichlorobenxeiii:
1,4-
1") irh lorohiMV/i'iu*
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
T
T
461
431
X
434
465
T
T
T
468
T
469
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
413
T
T
T >
T
T
T
T
T
T
T '
T
T
T
424
418
426
415
420
425
432
433
T
T
T
T
T
T"
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
464
T
T
T
436
471
421
435
440
414
X
X
X'
X
X
X
455
41V
439
422
459
4do
4311
X
428
423
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
V
P
P
P
P
110
1."'
;X"- Nimierical^fci.lan.1, "T" - Kegulateil as parl of total toxic organics(TTO). "P — No disulia^^in Jctuctahlo auuuinis
-------
F-9
Priority
Pollutants
3,3-
Dichlorobenzidin
e
1,1-
Dichloroethvlene
1 ,2-Trans-
dichloroelhylene
2,4-
Dichlorophenol
1,2-
Dichloropropane
1,3-
Dichloropropylen
Dichloropropenc)
2,4-
Dimelhvlphenol
,4-Dinitrotolucne
2,6-
Dinitrotoluene
1,2-
Diphenylhydrazin
e
Bhylbenzenc
Ruoranthene
4-Chlorophcnyl
PliaivlHlhu- ,
Industrial Category (-40 CFR Part)
467
T
T
T
T
461
431
434
465
T
468
T
T
469
T
T
T
T
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
424
418
426
415
420
425
432
433
T
T
T
T '
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
464
T
T
436
471
421
435
440
414
X
X
X
X
.•
X
X
X
455
419
439
422
45'J
466
'430
428
423
P
P
P
1'
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
HO
I ;•>
"X1'- Numerical Standard, "T" - Regulated as pail of total toxic org;ii)ics(TTO), "P"' — No discharge in delectable amounts
-------
F-10
Priority
Pollutants
4-Bromophenyl
Phenyl Ether
Bis (2-
Chloroisopropyl)
Ether
Bis (2-
Chloroethoxy)
Methane
Methylene
Chloride
(Dichloromethane
Methyl Chloride
(Chloromethane)
Methyl Bromide
(Bromomethane)
Bromoform
(Tribromomethan
e)
Dichlorobromom
ethane
Chlorodibromom
ethane
Hexachlorobutadi
ene
1 lexachlorocyclop
cntadiene
UnphnrnM, '
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
T
461
431
434
465
T
468
T
469
T
T
T
T
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
424
418
426
415'
420
425
432
433
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T '
464
T
,
436
471
421
435
440
414
X
X
X'
455
41,
43y
422
459
466
430
428
42J
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
|,
III)
!„"'
"X"- Numcricuj^^idard, "T" - Kcguliilcd ;is part of total toxic organicsCI'TO), "P" -- No
-------
F-ll
Priority
Pollutants
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o- "
cresol
N-
Nitrosodimethyla
mine
N-
Nitrosodiphenyla
mine
N-nitrosodi-n-
propylamine
Pentachloropheno
1
Phenol
Bis (2-
Ethylhexyl)
Phthalate
Butyl Benzyl
Phthalate
' Di-n-butyl
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
T
T
T
T
T
461
431
X
434
465
T
T
T
T
468
T
T
469
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
124
418
426
415
420
X
X
425
432
433
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
464
X
T
T
T
436
471
421
435
440
414
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
455 •
419
439
422
459
466
430
X
428
423
1'
P
,.
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
11(1
I.N
'X"- Numerical Standard, "T" - Regulated as part of total toxic organics(TTO), "P" -- No discharge in detectable amounts
-------
F-12
Priority
Pollutants
Di-n-octyl
Phthalate
Diclhyl Phthalate
Dimethyl
Phthalate
Benzo(a)anthrace
ne(l,2-
BenzanlhRacene)
Benzo(a)Pyrene
(3,4-
Benzopyrenc)
Benzo(b)fluorant
hene 3,4-
Benzofluoranlhen
e
Benzo(k)nu
ranthane(ll,12-
Benzofluoranthen
e)
Chrysene
Acenaphthvlene
Anthracene
Benzo(ghi)peiyle
ne(l,12-
Benzoperylene)
Fluorenc
PhiMi.'\nllnvni*
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
461
431
434
.
465
T
468
T
T
469
T
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
424
» •
418
426,
415
1
420
X
,
425
432
433
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
464
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
436
471
421
X
435
'
440
414
X
X
X
X
x
455
419
439
422
459
4o6
430
•
>
428
423
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
L>^
no
i.-.
L"X"- Numerical j^^ilard, "T" - Regulated as purl of total toxic organics(TTO), "P" — No c
i detectable amounts
-------
F-13
Priority
Pollutants
Dibenzo(a,h)anth
raccne (1,2,5,6-
Dibenzanthracene
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)
Pyrcne (2,3-o-
Pnenvlenepyrene)
Pvrene
Tetrachloroethyle
ne
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
(chloroethylene)
Aldrin
Dieldrin
Chlordane
(teclmical mixture
& matabolites)
4,4-DDT
4,4-DDE (p,p-
DDE)
4,4-DDD (p,p-
TDIi)
Alpha F.ndosiillnn
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
T
T
T
T
T
T
461
431
434
465
T
T
468
T
T.
469
T
T
T
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
424
418
426
415
420
X
425
-
432
433
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
l"
T
T
T
T
464
T
T
T
T
436
471
421
435
440
414
X
X
X
X
X
455
M
M
M
419
439
422
459
466
430
428
423
P
1»
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
110
1 -'>
"X"- Numerical Standard, "T" - Regulated as part of lolal toxic orgaiiies(TT( >). "I1 -- No discharge in detectable amounts
-------
F-14
Priority
Pollutants
Beta Endosulfan
Endosulfan
Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Epoxide
Alnha-BHC
(Hexachlorocyclo
hexane)
Beta-BIIC
Gatnma-BHC
(Lindane)
Delta-BHC
PCB-1242
(Arochlor 1242)
PCB-1254
(Arochlor 1254)
PCB-1221
(Arochlor 1221)
PCB-1232
C Arochlor m?1
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
461
•431
434
465
468
469
413
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
424.
418
426
415
420
425
432
-
433
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
464
436
471
421
435
440
414
455
M
M
419
439
422'
450
4(16
430
428
421
1'
P
1'
1'
1'
1'
1'
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
tin
i.:1'
X"- Numerical hj^^lnid. "T" - Regulated as part of total toxic organics(!TO), *'!'" — No ilisL-tiaij^ii dciccliiMc amounts
-------
F-15
Priority
Pollutants
PCB-1248
(Arochlor 1248)
PCB-1260
(Arochlor 1260)
PCB-1016
(Arochlor 1016)
Toxaphene
Antimony (Total)
Arsenic (Total)
Asbestos
(Fibrous)
Beryllium (Total)
Cadmium (Total)
Chromium
(Total)
Copper (Total)
Cyanide (Total)
Lead (Total)
Mercury (Total)
Nickel (Total)
Selenium (Total)
Silver (Totah
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
-167
T
T
T
X
X
461
X
X
X-
X
X
X
x.
x
431
434
465
X
X
X
468
X
X
X
X
469
X
X
X
X
X
413
T
T
T
T
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
424
X
X
418
426
X
415
X
X
X '
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
420
X
X
X
X
425
X
432
433
T
T
T
T
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
464
X
X
436
471
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
V
421
X
x .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Y
435
X
X
440
X
X
X
X
X
X
414
X
X
455
419
X
439
X
422
459
X
x
466
X
X
X
43(1
428
X
X
421
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
X
1
X
P
P
P
P
P
l>
III)
X
i.:-i
X
X
X
'X"- Numerical Standard, ''T" - Regulated as part of total toxic organics(TTO), "P" -- No dischaigc in delectable amounts
-------
F-16
.
Priority
Pollutants
Thallium (Total)
Zinc (Total)
2,3,7,8-
Telrachlorodiben
zo-p-dioxin
(TCDD)
Other Regulated
Pollutants
Ammonia, (as N)
Chromium,
Hexavalent
Cobalt
Cyanide,
Amenable'
Fluoride
Gold
Indium
Iron
Manganese
Molybdenum
Oil and Grease
Oihi-r l-Vsliridi-s
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
X
X
461
X
X
X
X
X
431
434
X
X
465
X
X
X
X
X
468
X
X
469
X
X
413
X
T
X
424
X
X .
X
418
X
X
426
X
X
415
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
420
X
X
X
X
425
X
432
X
X
433
X
T
X
X
464
X
X
436
-
X
X
471
X
X
X
X
X
421
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
435
440
X
X
X
414
X
455
\
M
419
X
X
X
439
422
X
459
X
466
X
X
430
X
42K
X
X
423
P
P
P
X
X
III)
X
IJ'I
X
X"- Numerical ^^jdard, "T" - Regulated as part of-total toxic organics(TTO), "P" -- No disclia^^in delectable amounts
-------
F-17
Priority
Pollutants
Palladium
Phosphorous
Phthalate
Platinum
Sulfide
Tantalum
Tin
Titanium
Total Metals
Tungsten
Industrial Category (40 CFR Part)
467
461
431
434
465
X
X
468
469 .
413
X
434
418
X
426
415
420
425
X
432
433
464
436
471
421
X
X
X
X
X
X
435
440
414
455
419
439
422
X
4i9
466
430
428
423
111)
X
I-'1'
"X"- Numerical Standard. "T" - Regulated as part of total toxic orgames(TTO), "P" -- No disclmige in deieclalile amounts
-------
F-18
1.2 BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT PERMITTING
Best Professional Judgment (BPJ) permitting is used in cases where an effluent limitation
guideline has not been promulgated for the industry or pollutant of concern. BPJ is defined as the
highest quality technical opinion developed by a permit writer after consideration of all reasonably
available and pertinent data or information that forms the bases for the terms and conditions of an
NPDES permit.
The NPDES regulations in 40 CFR 125.3 state that permits developed on a case-by-case
basis under Section 402(1)(1) of the CWA must consider (1) the appropriate technology for the
category class of point sources of which the applicant is a member, based on all available
information, and (2) any unique factors relating to the applicant. In setting BPJ limitations, the
permit writer must consider several specific factors as they appear in 40 CFR 125.3(d). These
factors, discussed in Section 1.1, are identical to the requirements for the development of effluent
limitations guidelines. .
1.3 WATER QUALITY-BASED LIMITATIONS
A water quality-based limitation is imposed upon a facility to ensure that the State water
quality standards are met for the receiving surface waters. Under the CWA, every State must
develop water quality standards applicable to the various bodies of water within the State, which
EPA must approve or disapprove the standards. States must review their water quality standards .
at least once every three years. Water quality standards comprise three parts:
• Uses or classifications of water. The CWA describes various uses of waters that
are considered desirable and should be protected. These uses include public water
supply, recreation, and propagation offish and wildlife.
• Water quality criteria. The regulations in 40 CFR 131.11 encourage States to
adopt both numeric and narrative water quality criteria. Numeric standards
represent levels that States determine must not be exceeded in order to protect the
designated uses of State water bodies; the numeric criteria may vary among States
and even among receiving waters within a State. Exhibit 1-4 lists the number of
states that have adopted numeric water quality standards for each priority pollutant.
Narrative criteria have been adopted by all States and include statements such as
"All State waters must, at all times and flows, be free from substances that are toxic
to humans or aquatic life." EPA periodically updates and publishes water quality
criteria which States can use as guidelines to help develop their criteria or to
supplement their criteria.
• A^tidegradation policy. EPA's antidegradation regulations (40 CFR 131.12)
require States to maintain high quality waters and outstanding natural resources
even where the designated uses of such waters would permit lower water quality.
-------
F-19
EXHIBIT 1-4
NUMBER OF STATES AND TERRITORIES WITH WATER
QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
Priority Pollutant
Acenapthene
Acrolein
Acrvlonitrile
Benzene
Benzidine
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
1 .2.4-trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1 ,2-dichloroethane
1.1.1 -trichloroethane
Hexachlorethane
1 . 1 -dichlorethane
1 . 1 ,2-trichiorethane
1 . 1 .2.2-tetrachlorethane
Chloroethane
Bis (2-chloroethvl) ether
2-chloroethvl vinvl ether
2-chloronapthalene
2.4.6-trichlorophenol
Parachlorometa cresol
Chloroform
2-chlorophenol
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene
1 .3 -dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
1 , 1 -dichloroethlvene
1 .2-trans-dichloroethvlene
2,4-dichlorophenol
1 ,2-dichloropropane
1 .2-dichloropropvlene
2 .4 -dimethvlphenol
1..4-dinitrotoluene
»2,6-dinitrotoluene
1 ,2-diphenylhvdrazine
No. States .
•w/Standards*
Adopted
16
17
17
21
23
20
18
8
19
20
19
17
1
18
19
1
17
5
4
19
16
' 22
20
18
18
19
15
19
9
20
6
17
14
16
7
16
No. States ,
w/Standards*
Adopted/Expected
31
34
33
44
38
41
36
11
35
40
' 41
33 !
~>
35
36
1
33
8
5
35
30
39
34
35
35
38
31
41
14
• 36
8
32
28
33
8
32
-------
F-20
Priority Pollutant
Ethvlbenzene
Fluoranlhene
4-chlorophenvl phenvl ether
4-bromoDhenvl phenvl ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropvl) ether
Bis (2-chloroetho\V) methane
Methvlene chloride
Methvl chloride
Methvl bromide
Bromoform
Dichlorobromomethane
Chlorodibromomethane
Hexachlorobutadiene- ' . .
Hexachlorocvclopentadiene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
2 ,4 -dini trophenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
N-nitrosodimethvlamine
N-nitrosodiphenvlamine .
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Bis (2-ethvlhexvl) phthalate
Butvl benzvl phthalate
Di-n-butvl phthalate
Di-n-octvl phthalate
Diethvl phthalate
Dimethvl phthalate .
1 ,2-benzanthracene
Benzo (a) pvrene
3 ,4-benzofluoranthene
11,1 2-benzofluoranthene
Clirvsene
Acenaphthvlene
utthracene
»1 , 1 2 benzopvrvlene
Fluorene
No. States .
w/Standards*
Adopted
18
17
3
4
15
. 3
- -17
16
15
19
19
17
'20
18
17
8
18
6
7
17
14
16
15
8
27
33
23
12
22
10
21
22
15
16
15
15
15
14
15
15
14
No. States
w/Standards'
Adopted/Expected
35
34
5
6
31
9
36
33
32
37
37
35
37 .
34 .
33
10
34
8
9
33
32
32
31
11
46
43
38
13
37
12
34
36
34
36
34
34
34
33
34
34
33
-------
F-21
Priority Pollutant
Phenanthrene
1 .2.5.6-dihenzanthracene
Irideno (\ ,2,3-cd") pvrene
Pvrene
Tetrachloroethvlene
Toluene
Trichloroethvlene
Vinvl chloride
Aldrin
Diedrin
Chlordane
4,4-DDT
4,4-DDE
4,4-DDD
Alpha-endosulfan
Beta-endosulfan
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehvde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Ganima-BHC (lindane)
Delta-BHC
PCB-1242
PCB-1254
PCB-1221 .
PCB-1232
PCB-1248
PCB-1260
PCB-1016
Toxaphene
Antimonv
Arsenic
Asbestos
Bervllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cvanide
Lead
No. States .
w/Standards'
Adopted
15
16
15
15
20
20
20
19
40
39
38
37
17
18
36
36
23
41
13
37
16
. 19
19
38
7
40
40
40
40 '
40
40
40
41
19
42
9
24
. 43
45
39
42
43
No. States .
w/Standards'
Adopted/Expected
' 34
35 • ,
34
34
40
38
42
39
51
51
50
51
33
34
48
49
33
52
25
• 49
30
35
36
51
10
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
52
35
53
24
39
53
54
.50
52 .
53 . '
-------
F-22
Priority Pollutant
Mercurv
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Dioxin (2,3,7 .8-TCDD)
No. States
w/Standards'
Adopted
43
34
45
44
19
40
19
No. States .
w/Standards'
Adopted/Expected
53
• 50
54
53 -
37
51
42
* State has numeric standards for one or more uses
To determine the impact of a facility's effluent on water quality standards, the permit
writer uses a variety of approaches and modeling techniques: One method of screening involves
using existing effluent .data and the State's numeric water quality standards to determine which
chemicals need controls. A second approach (whole effluent toxicity, or WET) involves the use
of test organisms to measure the toxicity of wastewater; this approach allows the permit writer to
protect narrative standards such as "no toxics in toxic amounts." A third approach is to assess the
overall biological integrity of an aquatic community using biological surveys and other direct.
measurements of resident biota; unlike the other approaches this evaluation may not necessarily be
specific to a particular discharger.
If, following the implementation of technology based limits, the receiving water
concentrations still exceed the water quality standards, the discharges into such waters are subject
to farther reduction. EPA requires that all effluents be characterized by the permit authority to
determine the need for water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs) to control the
discharge (40 CFR 122.44(d)). At a minimum, the permitting authority must make this
determination at each permit reissuance and must develop permit limits that will control the
discharge. This involves modeling pollutants in the facility's effluent to the receiving water and
comparing the numbers to the applicable State water quality criteria; WQBELs are needed when
the criteria are exceeded.
V
Setting WQBELs may be complicated when water quality in a water body is affected by
more than one discharger. In these cases, site-specific allocations (point source wasteload.
allocations, or WLAs) are calculated from water quality criteria.
1.4. VARIANCES
The CWA provides a mechanism for modifying CWA requirements for individual facilities
through variances. However, in no case can a variance be granted if State water quality standards
are exceeded. The three types of variances, discussed below, are economic, water quality, and
fundamentally different factors.
-------
F-23
Section 301(c) of the CWA provides for a variance for nonconventional pollutants from
BAT effluent guidelines due to economic factors. The facility must present modified requirements
that meet the following criteria.
• Represent the maximum use of technology within the economic capability of the
owner or operator.
• At a minimum, demonstrate compliance with all applicable BPT limitations and
pertinent water quality standards and provide for a reasonable degree of
improvement in the applicant's discharge.
Section 301(g).of the CWA provides for a variance for certain nonconventional pollutants
(including ammonia, chlorine, color, iron, and total phenols) from BAT effluent guidelines due to
localized environmental factors. The facility must present modified requirements that meet the
following criteria:
• The modified requirements must result in compliance with BPT and water quality
standards of the receiving stream.
• No additional treatment will be required of other point or nonpoint source
dischargers as a result of the variance approval.
This variance request typically involves a great deal of water quality assessment, including aquatic
toxicity, mixing zone and dilution model analysis, and possible site-specific criterion development.
Section 301(n) of the CWA provides for variances based upon fundamentally different.
factors (PDF). PDF variances for direct dischargers are available from effluent guidelines
regulations for BPT, BCT and BAT for toxic, conventional, and nonconventional pollutants if the
individual facility is found to be fundamentally different from the factors considered in establishing
the effluent guidelines (e.g., the facilities' equipment and processes differ from those considered).
State water quality standards must also be met. Permits based on PDF variances generally include
effluent limitations, however, these limitations may be significantly different than those found at
other facilities in the same industry.
2.0 NPDES PERMITTING PROCESS
Control of direct discharges under CWA has relied on NPDES permits since 1972 when
the first permits under the CWA were written. In the intervening years, the complexity of permit
applications, considerations incumbent on the permit writer, the permit language and conditions
have increased significantly. Permitting considerations do vary according to receiving water,
industry, and specific operating practices at the permitted facility; however, the process of
developing and/or renewing permits is largely similar across the country. When considering the
impacts of NPDES permits on the LDR programs, it is valuable to consider the process under
which these permits are developed, renewed, and modified.
In general, federal regulations establish policies, approaches, and training guidelines within
the NPDES program but delegate program implementation to states and regional authorities. As
discussed in the previous section, categorical effluent guidelines, and water quality criteria are first
-------
F-24
developed at the federal level. Authorized states then adopt these technical standards and
approaches and refine and apply them to address local concerns and water quality goals. Where
states are not authorized and where water bodies and watersheds cross state boundaries, regional
authorities may implement or coordinate aspects, of the NPDES permitting program.
State and regional permit writers take the established guidelines and integrate them with
local water quality standards on a facility-specific basis. The rules provide the permit writer with
broad authority and responsibility to integrate technological and water quality concerns to
develop effluent limitations and to develop and negotiate permit conditions and language. Permit
writers often develop discharge permits for both industrial and public discharges and may address
storm water discharges and municipal sludge use and disposal practices during a permit renewal.
Generally NPDES permits are renewed every five years with the new application submitted
approximately one year prior to the end of the current permit4.
2.1 DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL FACILITY PERMIT
2.1.1 The Application
All facilities that wish to be permitted for discharges under NPDES must submit a detailed
permit application. Applications for permit renewals far exceed the number of new permit
applications.5 Among other information, the application must include chemical analyses of the
facility's effluent discharge. This analytical data provides a key source the identification and
selection of parameters to be included in the eventual permit. Depending on industry category,
gas chromatograph - mass spectrometer (GC/MS) analyses of volatile, acid, base/neutral, and
pesticide fractions may be required in addition to analysis for toxic metals and cyanide and a wide
variety of conventional and non-conventional pollutants. Analytical requirements and target
analytes for each categorical industry are provided in Attachment F-3. In addition to analytical
data the application provides extensive characterization of waste water treatment practices and
on-site operations. This information, in addition to the existing permit and compliance record, is
used by the permit writer to provide a baseline on the facility.
Permit writers often rely heavily on the chemical analyses submitted in the permit
applications. These data provide the permit writer with a starting point for identifying parameters
of concern which is then augmented by reviewing of plant operations and raw materials. These
data also provide the primary basis for concentration estimates used by the permit writer. These
chemical analyses consider a wide array of chemicals, many of which would be considered
underlying hazardous constituents under the Phase III LDR. There are, however, a number of
constituents which have universal treatment standards which are not considered under these
analytical requirements. Those UTS chemicals which are not considered under CWA permit
application requirements are summarized in Exhibit 2-1.
Federal regulations require application at least 180 days prior to a new discharge or permit renewal, however, individual
states may have different schedules. Generalization to one year is based on a personal conversation with Russ Sherer. director of
South Carolina's NPDES program and confirmed with SAIC permit writers and inspectors.
5 Training Manual for NPDES Writers, 1993, pg 2-1
-------
. F-25
Facilities which identify one or several of the underlying hazardous constituents listed in
Exhibit 2-1 in their ICRT wastes will not have, in many cases, addressed these constituents in
their NPDES permit. As a result, these facilities may need to seek a NPDES permit modification
to address these constituents or meet the LDR end-of-pipe treatment standards.
2.1.2 Additional Information Collection from the Facility
The permit writer may request additional information including additional chemical
analyses if the application is incomplete or if facility specific concerns are not fully addressed in
the application. Only when the information is considered by the permit writer to be complete
and accurate is a draft permit be written.
Other information may be used by the permit writer in preparing the permit's
monitoring requirements. Site visit information may be used to identify unique situations or
special problems that could be addressed in the draft permit. Facility dialogue may be a way
to refine permit requirements as well. For example, the monitoring of indicator parameters
may be justified following economic considerations of monitoring requirements and
demonstrations that such monitoring would be effective. The monitoring of internal outfalls
may be developed between the permit writer and the facility as a method to track significant
sources of pollutants within the plant. Other special conditions may be imposed by the permit
as a result of site-specific knowledge.
2.1.3 Selection of Parameters
Upon review of the application the permit writer must conduct several analysis to
determine the pollutants to be included in the permit and to establish effluent limitations. As a
starting point, the permit writer will generally include all pollutants identified in the application.
As discussed above, the permit writer must determine when and if there are applicable effluent
guidelines or water quality standards and utilize the more stringent standard. If a pollutant is not
identified in the application, the permit writer will generally assume the pollutant is not present at
levels of concern and may or may not include that parameter in the monitoring requirements and
limitations. During this process, the permit writer is given discretion to eliminate pollutants that
are not believed to be present, even if those pollutants are on the effluent guideline or water
quality standard. In addition, the permit writer may make use of indicator parameters to address
:a wide spectrum of pollutants. For example, a benzene/toluene/xylene analysis may be used to
indicate the presence of a wide range of common petroleum-based pollutants.
2.1.4 Setting of Numerical Monitoring Standards
Effluent limitations are based on technology and water quality factors. Technology-
based limitations are calculated from effluent limitations guidelines and best professional
judgment, whereas water quality factors are incorporated into permits through State-established
water quality standards. Permit limitations must be based on the more stringent of these two
factors in cases of overlap.
/ . •
In converting technology-based limitations such as effluent limitations guidelines to
permit conditions, a permit writer uses site-specific information together with the limitations to
-------
F-26
generate loadings. Numerical water quality standards must be back-calculated from ambient
water quality data to determine appropriate permit loadings.
Requirements for both average (e.g., average daily loading over one month) and
maximum (e.g., quantity of pollutant in one day) values are typically listed in a permit. These
numerical values are calculated following consideration of production rate, type of business
(including multiple products or applicable categories), and the effectiveness of indicator
pollutants. Other requirements of the monitoring standards of the permit include:
• Monitoring frequency;
• Sample location (including internal outfalls);
• Sample type (e.g., instantaneous, 24-hour flow composite, or 24-hour time
composite);
• Monitoring of pollutants with no permit limitation; and
• Analytical methodology.
When incorporated into the remainder of the permit (which includes, for example, general
facility information, reporting requirements, and noncompliance notification), the draft standards
and supporting material are required to be issued as a public notice. A 30-day public comment
period follows, which may or may not include a public hearing. Following the consideration and
response to all public comments, the final permit is modified (if necessary) and issued.
2.1.5 Administrative Record
The administrative record for a draft permit consists, at a minimum, of the following
documents:
• The application and supporting data;
• The draft permit;
• The statement of basis or fact sheet;
• All items cited in the statement of basis or fact sheet, including calculations used to
derive the permit limits;
• All other items in the supporting file; and
• " For new sources, any environmental assessment, the draft/final environmental
impact statement (IS), or other such background information, such as a Findings of
No Significant Impact.
The record for the final permit consists of the record for the draft, permit, as well as copies .
of the following:
-------
F-27
• All comments received during the comment period;
• The tape or transcript of any public hearing;
• Any materials submitted at a hearing;
• Responses to comments;
• For NPDES new source permits, the draft or final EIA; and
• The final permit.
The administrative record includes all meeting reports and correspondence with the
applicant and correspondence with other regulatory agency personnel. In addition, trip reports
and telephone memos are included in the record.
2.2 NPDES PERMIT MODIFICATION PROCESSES
After the final permit is issued, the permit may still need to be modified or revoked and
reissued prior to the expiration date. Modifications differ from revocations and reissuance.. In a
permit modification, only the conditions subject to change are reconsidered while all other permit
conditions remain in effect. Conversely, the entire permit may be reconsidered when it is revoked
and reissued. A permit modification may be triggered in several ways. For example, a
representative of the regulatory agency may conduct an inspection of the facility and determine
that a need for modification exists, or information submitted by the permittee may suggest the
need for a change. Further, any interested person may request that a permit modification be
made.
There are two classifications of modifications: major and minor. From a procedural
standpoint, they differ primarily with respect to the public notice requirement. Major
modifications require public notice; minor modifications do not. Most substantive changes in a
permit are considered major modifications.
Virtually all modifications that result in less stringent conditions must be treated as a major
modification, with provisions for public notice and comment. Generally, a permit will not be
modified during the term of the permit if the facility is in full compliance with permit conditions.
The permit usually specifies several conditions which, if met, would trigger a permit modification.
Conditions that would necessitate a major modification of a permit are described in 40 CFR
122.62 and include the following:
• Alterations-When alternations or changes in operations occur that justify new
conditions that are different from the existing permit. •
• Information-When information is received that was not available at the time of
permit issuance.
• New Regulations-When standards or regulations on which the permit was based
have been changed by promulgation of amended standards or regulations or by
judicial decision.
• Compliance Schedules-When good cause for modification of a compliance
schedule exits, such as an Act of God, strike, or flood.
-------
F-28
EXHIBIT 2-1
UTS CONSTITUENTS NOT PRESENT IN NPDES PERMIT
APPLICATION TESTING REQUIREMENTS
A2213 •
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetophenone
2 - Acety laminofluorene
Acrylamide
Aldicarb sulfone
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aramite
Barban
Bendiocarb
Bendiocarb phenol
Benomyl
Benzol chloride
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
n-Butyl alcohol
Butylate
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenoiyDinoseb
Carbenzadim
C arbofuran phenol '
Carbosulfan
p-Chloroaniline
Chlorobenzilate
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene .
m-Cumenyl methylcarbamate '
Cycloate
Cyclohexanone
o,p'-DDD
o.p'-DDE
o.p'-DDT -
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Diethylene glycol, dicarbamate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Dimetilan
1,4-Dioxane
-Diphenylamine
Dithiocarbamates (total)
EPIC
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl cyanide/Propanenitrile
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethylene oxide
Famphur
Formetanate hydrochloride
Formparanate
HxCDDs (All Hexacblorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
HxCDFs (All Hexachlorodibeozofurans)
Hexachloropropylene
lodomethane
3-Iodo-2-propynyl n-butylcarbamate
Isobutyl alcohol
Isodhn
Isolan
Methacrylomtnle
Methanol
Methapyrileoe
Methiocarb
3-Methylcbolanthrene
4,4-Methylene bis(2-caloroaniline)
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methaosulfonate
Metolcarb
Molinate
2-Naphthylaminc
o-Nitroaruline
p-Nitro aniline
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
Oxamyl
Pebulate
Pentachlorobenzene
PeCDDs (AD Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
PeCDFs (AJ1 Pentachlorodibenzofurans)
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenaceiin
o-Phenylenediamine
Phorate
Phthalic acid
Phthalic anhydride
Physosti prune
Physostigmine salicylate
Promecarb
Pronamide
Propham
Propoxur
Prosulfocarb
Pyridine
Safrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
TCDDs (All Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
TCDFs (All Tetrachlorodibenzofurans)
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Thiodicarb
Thiophanate-methyl
Tirpate
Triallate
Trichloromonofluoromethane
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
1 ^,3-Trichloropropane
1,1 ^-Trichloro-1 ^,2-trifluoroethane
tris-(2,3-Dibroniopropyl) phosphate
Vemolate
-------
F-29
• Variance Requests-When requests for variances, net effluent limitations,
pretreatment, etc., are filed within the specified time but not granted until after
permit issuance.
• Reopener-Conditions in the permit that required it to be reopened under certain
circumstances.
• Net Limits-Upon request of a permittee who qualifies for effluent limitations on a
net basis under 40 CFR 122.45(g) and (h).
• Pretreatment-To require that an approved program be implemented or to change
the schedule for program development. '
• Failure to Notify-Upon failure of an approved-State to notify another State whose
waters may be affected by a discharge from the approved State.
• Non-limited Pollutants-When the level of discharge of any pollutant that is not
limited in the permit exceeds the level that can be achieved by the technology-
based treatment requirements appropriate to the permit.
• Notification Levels-To establish notification levels for toxic pollutants that are not
limited in the permit but must be reported if concentrations in the discharge exceed
these levels.
• Technical Mistakes-To correct technical mistakes or mistaken interpretations of
law made in developing the permit conditions.
• Compliance Schedules for Innovative or Alternative Facilities-To modify the
compliance schedule in light of the additional time that may be required to
construct this type of facility.
• Failed BPJ Compliance-When BPJ technology is installed and properly operated
and maintained but the permittee is unable to meet its limits, the limits may be
reduced to reflect actual removal; but in no case may they be less than the
guideline limits. If BPJ operation and maintenance costs are totally
disproportionate to the costs considered in a subsequent guideline, the permittee
may be allowed to backslide to the guideline limits.
Permit modification requirements and procedures vary significantly from state to state. To
explore these differences and their impact on LDR compliance, cognizant permitting officials have
been contacted from the States of South Carolina5 and West Virginia7. Both states indicated that
a permit modification which added new pollutant limitations would be considered a major
modification. These officials also indicated that a significant increase in the number of industrial
Personal conversation with Russ Sherer. the director of the South Carolina's NPDES office, October 5. 1995
Personal conversation with Mr, Randy Sovick, Section Head, Industrial Waste Section, Office of Water Resources, State
of West Virginia on October 23. 1995 • '
-------
F-30
facilities requesting permit modifications as a result of the Phase III LDR rulemaking would have
a significant adverse impact on the state's permitting activities. South Carolina has recently
undertaken a watershed-based approach to issuing permits consisting of dividing the state into 5
distinct basins or watersheds. Each year all permits discharging into one basin are reviewed and
issued, establishing a laddered approach ensuring all permits are reviewed every five years. This
approach has the advantage of being able to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL) of
individual contaminants to a given body of water. Contaminant levels for individual permits are
established based on a waste load allocation (WLA) to the entire basin.
West Virginia indicated that the state had a structured permit modification process in
which the state has 180 days to evaluate and act on a major permit modification. Due to the
current backlog of permit modifications and renewals, West Virginia indicated that a modification
would take in excess of a year to process. The official contacted expressed concern that
additional modification applications would only increase the existing backlog but indicated that
the state was required to process new applications in a timely manner.
3 NPDES PERMITS AS COMPARED TO UTS AS PLANNED CV PHASE III LDR
The proposed Phase III LDR end-of-pipe standards would defer to RCRA treatment
standards to CWA standards if a facility has an NPDES permit that addresses all UHCs based on
technology-based standards, water quality-based standards, or best professional judgment by the
permitting authority or the facility has been granted a Fundamentally Different Factors variance.
If a facility determines that it generates ICRT wastes and manages those wastes in a surface
impoundment, that facility can: 1) document that any underlying hazardous constituents (UHC)
have been considered under their NPDES permit or permit application, 2) seek a modification to
their NPDES permit to address any UHCs, or 3) meet the LDR end-of-pipe treatment standards.
In order to better understand how these requirements will affect facilities, a comparison of
constituents found in industrial NPDES permits to those constituents with established universal
treatment standards has been performed.
In the three sections that follow, such a comparison of NPDES permit parameters
(extracted from the PCS data base) and the LDR UTS (as presented in Phase III) has been
presented in three different levels of detail. The first presents a comparison of NPDES permit
parameters nation-wide to the LDR UTS constituents. The second presents a comparison of
NPDES permit parameters by industry (as defined by the Effluent Guidelines program) to the
LDR UTS constituents. Finally, four case studies were prepared, comparing facility-specific
NPDES permit parameters to LDR UTS constituents. Each case study attempts to assess the
likelihood that the individual facility will be subject to LDR standards not previously in place or
will require a NPDES permit modification to address underlying hazardous constituents (UHCs)
not controlled under, the existing permit. Each case study considers actual wastes known to be
ICRT at point of generation, the UHCs in those wastes at point of generation which are likely to
be known by the facility, and the actual NPDES permit limitation in force at the facility.
Each of the comparisons of PCS data to Phase III LDR rely on several common
assumptions. For many PCS parameters there is no one-to-one match with a UTS hazardous
constituent. For example, an indicator parameter like total recoverable phenols has been assumed
to provide a basis for deferring all phenolic compounds to CWA control. In this case, a single
PCS parameter links to many UTS compounds. In some cases, permits may include broad
-------
F-31
indicator parameters (i.e., total organic carbon, total volatile organics, chlorinated hydrocarbons,
etc.) which might be considered controls of a large number of specific contaminants. For the
purpose of comparison, these broad indicators are assumed to be insufficiently specific to
individual hazardous compounds to be considered a basis for deferral to CWA.
3.1 NATION-WIDE COMPARISON OF NPDES PERMIT PARAMETERS TO LDR
UTS
PCS summarizes permit conditions and monitoring results for more than 50,000 direct
discharge permits. Most permits control conventional pollutants only and do not address any toxic
pollutants. These facilities tend to include storm water dischargers, POTWs, and industries for
which effluent guidelines do not specify any toxic pollutants. Where toxic pollutants are reflected
in the NPDES permits, inorganic species tend to be most common. Specific organic compounds
are least frequently monitored, with most common organics appearing in 50 - 400 permits.
Exhibit 3-1 presents one page of a an example of the nationwide comparison data. The first
column lists the UTS constituents. The second and third columns show how many of the permits
have a quantitative limit and monitoring only requirements for the constituent, respectively. The
fourth column shows.the total number of permits (the sum of the second and third columns). The
nationwide comparison is presented in its entirety in Attachment F-l.
3.2 INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC COMPARISON OF NPDES PERMIT PARAMETERS TO
LDRUTSs
The industry-specific comparison illustrates the overlap of UTS constituents with
parameters from existing NPDES permits within industry groups as defined in the Effluent
Guidelines program. A comparison was performed for each of the industries with data in PCS (a
total of 38 out of 51 possible industries) and the results of this comparison is presented in
Attachment F-2. Exhibit 3-2 presents an example of the comparison format utilizing the results
for the organic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers (OCPSF) industry. In this example, 131 of
the approximately 250 UTS constituents are included in at least one OCPSF permit.
3.3 FACILITY-SPECIFIC CASE STUDY COMPARISON
The four case study facilities were chosen from facilities in the dyes and pigments,
carbamates, chlorinated aliphatics, solvent users, and organobromine industries based on their
estimated potential to be subject to the proposed Phase III LDR rulemakings as generators of
decharacterized wastes. Facilities were identified as candidates for the case studies based on the
following information sources: the RCRA Section 3007 Questionnaires, plant visit reports,
engineering analyses, sampling data, capacity studies, and other existing information sources were
consulted in choosing potential facilities for the case studies. The facilities were confirmed as
having NPDES permits through a search of the PCS data base. Each of the four facilities chosen
for a case study has an on-site surface impoundment as a part of a wastewater treatment train that
manages ICRT wastes.
The presence of ICRT wastes at each case study facility was identified based on RCRA
Section 3007 Questionnaire responses, engineering judgment, and in some instances personal
knowledge of the facility. For each of the case study facilities, and engineering analysis was
performed to identify all potential chemical constituents that would be expected to be present in
-------
F-32
EXHIBIT 3-1
NATIONWIDE PCS/UTS COMPARISON (example)
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for all Industries
UTS Constituents
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
Total No. of :
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1.1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.1,1 •Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro- 1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethylene
1.2,4,5 -Tetrachlorobenzene
1.2,4-Thchlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromoethane/Ethylene dibromide
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1.2-Diphenylhydrazine
1,4-Dioxane
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4,5-T
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4-D
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dinitro toluene
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
2-Chloronaphthaleae
2-Chlorophenol
2-scc-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
3-Chloropropylene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Acenaphthene •
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Aciylonitrile
Aldrin
aJpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
1
206
46
5
55
90
114
6
24
5
104
22
27
1
33
35
1
69
67
11
388
35
33
12
389
1
7
6
62
369
0
384
5
39
39
22
1
29
38
54
19
4
34
88
337
0
158
123
1
125
135
133
24
120
3
138
112
113
2
7
10.
I
123
110
14
531
116
8
106
533
0
110
101
114
499
1
536
103
115
103
9
0
140
124
109
131
1
107
341
1106
I
364
169
6
ISO
225
247
30
144
8
242
134
140
3
40
45
2
192
177.
25
919
151
41
118
922
1
117
107
176
868
1
920
108
154
142
31
1
169
162
163
150
5
141
429
1443
-------
F-33
EXHIBIT 3-2
INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC PCS/UTS COMPARISON (example)
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORG CHEMS, PLASTICS & SYN FTBR
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
bis(2-ChJoroethoxy)methane 2 0 .2
Acetonitrile .0 2 2
o-Dichlorobenzene _ 182 9 191
p-Cresol 90 21 111
p-Nitrophenol 219 13 232
Acenaphthylene . 140 13 153
Bendiocaro phenol 89 21 110
Acetone 1 4 5
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether - 3 1 4
p-Dichlorobenzene 179 10 189
gamma-BHC 2 1 3
Antimony • 14 8 22
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 181 11 192
p,R'-DDD ^2 0 2
delta-BHC 202
p,p'-DDT 3 0 3
Benz(a)anthracene 155 11 166
p,p'-DDD 2 0 2
m-Cresol 89 21 110
m-Dichlorobenzene 177 10 187
cis-l,3-Dichloropropylene 3 I 4
Oiphenylnitrosamine 2 0 2
Diethyl phthalate 157 11 168
Benzene 204 10 214
Chromium (Total) 156 12 168
Chlorobenzene 186 10 196
Chrysene 155 13 168
Carbon tetrachloride 177 11 188
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 7 5 12
Cyanides (Total) 108 19 127
BenzoOOfluoranthene 156 11 167
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 0 1
Di-n-propylnitrosamine 1 1 2
Carbon disulfide 10 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate 2 1 3
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene 53 8
Carbaryl 101
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 8 4 12
Di-n-octyl phthalate 729
Carbofuran 202
Chloroethaoe 178 11 189
Dieldiin 3 0 3
Di-n-butyl phthalate 162 9 171
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride 177 13 190
-------
F-34
EXHIBIT 3-2
INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC PCS/UTS COMPARISON (example cont.)
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORG CHZMS, PLASTICS & SYN FTBR
UTS Constituents
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Carbofuran phenol
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Chlordane (alpha and gamma tsomers)
Chloroform
Bromodichloro methane
Benzo(a)pyTene
Beryllium
Chlorodibromomethane
Cyanides (Amenable)
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Hexachlorocyclopentadiehe
. Methylene chloride
Toluene
Dithiocarbamates (total)
Mercury - Ail Others
Tetrachloroethylene
Fluoranthene
Silver
Silvex/2,4,5-TP
Toxaphene
Hexachloroethane
Thallium
Methyl ethyl ketone
Lead
Fluoride
Ethyl benzene
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomen. or all Arocio
Hexachlorobenzene
HxCDDs (All Hexachlorodibenzp-p-dioxins)
Pyridine
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan sulfate
Hexachlorobutadiene
Pyrene
Sulfide
Endosulfan Q
Heptachlor epoxide
Methyl methacrylate
Fluorene
, Mercury - Nonwastewater firom Retort
Selenium
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
154
89
20
5
1
194
8
156
7
9
108
7
1
2
193
202
1
36
191
154
19
2
2
176
4
0
112
16
190
5
179
0
0
2
2
178
157
9
2
2
0
157
36
14
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
11
21
10
2
0
14
2
11
3
1
19
5
2
0
17
16
0
17
13
12
5
0
0
10
2
3
24
3
14
1
10
1
1
0
0
9
13
0
0
0
1
13
17
5
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
165
110
30
7
1
208
10
167
10
10
127
12 .
3
2
210
218
1
53
204
166
24
"2
2
186
6
3
136
19
204
6
189
I
1
2
2
187
170
9
2
2
I
' 170
53
19
11/21/95
-------
F-35
EXHIBIT 3-2
INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC PCS/UTS COMPARISON (example cont.)
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORG CHEMS, PLASTICS & SYN FIBR
UTS Constituents
Endrin
Heptachlor
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2-Chlorophenol
Trichloroethylene
TCDDs (All Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
1,1.1 -Trichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dibromoethane/Ethylene dibromide
Tribromomethane/Bromoform
Trichloromonofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetnane
1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Zinc
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,44)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2-ChJoro-l,3-butadiene
2-Chloronapbthalene
1,2-DichJoropropane
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
1,4-Dioxane
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4,5-T
1,2-Dichloroethane
Vanadium "
2,4-Dtnitrophenot
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
3-Chloropropylene
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4,6-Dinitro-o-crcsol
p-Dichlorobenze
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Acetone
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
2
1
151
1
89
149
192
0
I
188
181
178
1
8
7
182
148
4
179
149
185
179
9
201
3
1
1
1
178
7
12
2
2
189
2
216
1
0
2
220
1
1
» 0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
. 0
9
I
21
10
13
I
1
13
12
10
0
- 3
1
11
10
0
11
10
26
10
1
15
0
0
0
2
10
0
7
0 '
0
11
2
15
1
1
0
12
0
0
I
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
2
i
160
2
no
159
205
1
2 •
201
193
188
1
11
8
193
158
4
190
159
211
189
10
216
3
1
1
3
188
7
.9
2
2
200
4
231
2
1
2
232
1
1
1
11/21/95
-------
F-36
each of the ICRT wastes managed in the wastewater treatment system. A comparable analysis
would be undertaken by the facility in implementing the Phase III LDR.
APPROACH
Underlying hazardous constituents (UHCs) were identified based on processes' raw
materials, potential break-down products, and analytical testing/monitoring data. Facility
personnel, performing the same analysis would likely have considerable additional resources for
characterizing these waste streams. These are the UHCs that would need to have been included,
or dropped from the facility's permit in order to be exempt from the Phase III land disposal
restrictions. This analysis, presented in each of the four case studies, is an attempt to mimic what
would need to be done by each facility in order to comply with the Phase III LDR rule.
Based on this analysis, conclusions were drawn regarding each facility's permit coverage,
their various options for dealing with Phase III LDR, the permit modification process a facility
might need to undertake, and the amount of time which would be required to modify the permit.
Since the Phase III end-of-pipe standards would defer to NPDES discharge limits where either the
permit specifically addresses a chemical or where a chemical was considered for the permit, a
number of different scenarios could potentially be construed as "considered" for the permit. The
following scenarios were developed and applied to each case study:
• The constituent is listed with a limit in the permit - the constituent is not subject to
.Phase UTS;
• The constituent is required to be tested by NPDES industry guidelines (see
Attachment F-3) but the permit writer has excluded the constituent and
documented the reason - the constituent is not subject to UTS;
• The constituent is required to be tested by NPDES industry guidelines (see
Attachment F-3), but did not exceed the state ambient or discharge limits,
analytical proof is documented - the constituent is not subject to UTS;
• The constituent is required to be tested by NPDES industry guidelines (see
Appendix) but was not detected in the analyses, analytical proof is documented -
the constituent is not subject to UTS; or
Attachment F-3, referenced above, presents the analytical testing that must be conducted
by a facility to identify constituents in their wastewaters. These chemicals must then be listed on
the facility's NPDES permit application. The tests include:
• Organic toxic pollutants which include volatile, acid compounds, base/neutrals,
and pesticides (Table II of Attachment F-3); and
• Other toxic pollutants including metals, cyanide, and total phenols (Table III of
Attachment F-3).
-------
' F-37
In addition, a facility is required to test for conventional and nonconventional pollutants (listed in
Table IV of Attachment F-3) if these pollutants are expected to be present. Finally, there is a list
of toxic pollutants and hazardous substances that the facility is required to identify for possible
inclusion in their NPDES permit, if these constituents are expected to be present in the effluent
(listed in Table V of Attachment F-3).
In addition to the above six scenarios, it is possible that a permit writer considered
additional constituents beyond those in effluent guideline and the permit application requirements.
For example, a permit writer may identify constituents from material safety data sheets or from .
dialogue with the facility. If additional constituents were considered they should be. reflected in
the administrative record. For purposes of this analysis it has been impossible to access those
administrative records. As a result, this assessment is limited those constituents found in the
permit and those generally required in permit applications.
Attachment F-4 presents a summary of each of the case study facilities ICRT waste
streams and the UTS constituents that were found in each waste stream.
Attachment F-5 presents the data extracted from PCS for each of the four case study
facilities. In addition, quantity-based limits, concentration-based limits, and monitoring-only
requirements for each constituent is also presented. For the purpose of these case studies, all
constituents present in the facility's permit were cross-referenced with constituents on the
Universal Treatment Standard (UTS) list8 to identify all constituents on a facility's permit that
have a treatment standard. These constituents are presented at the top of each table. .
Descriptions of each of the table's column headings are presented below:
Data Field
State
Pipefl
PCS Code
Parameter Name
UTS Name
Quantity Avg.
Quantity Max.
Cone. Min.
Cone. Avg.
Description
State where case study facility is located
Code assigned by PCS to. unique outfalls
Code assigned by PCS to unique chemical constituents,
physical properties, etc.
Name of constituent present if facility's surface water
permit
Name of constituent as appears on the UTS list, signifies
a match
Average quantity limit
Maximum quantity limit
Minimum concentration limit
Average concentration limit
UTS list as published in September 1995 Draft Proposal of LDR Phase IV
-------
F-38
Data Field
Cone. Max.
Cone. Units
Quantity Units
End Date .
Monitor Onlv
Description
Maximum concentration limit
Units for all concentrations
units for all quantities
Date through which limit is applicable
"1" signifies "monitoring only"requirements. "0" does
not.
Based on these case studies, it appears that three of the four case study facilities will
identify underlying hazardous constituents which are not listed in their NPDES permit. Most of
the UHCs, not listed in the NPDES permits, are considered in the required standard analytical test
methods and therefore may be deferred to CWA control if those constituents were identified as
required, in the permit application. However, in one case study facility, there is a UHC which is
not considered under the standard permit application. The presence of this constituent, thiocarb,
may require the case study facility to comply with LDR treatment standards or modify their
NPDES permit.
3.3.1 CASE STUDY FACILITY #1
Case Study Facility #1 .is a carbamate or dye and pigment producing facility potentially
subject to Phase III LDR. Facility #1 has six decharacterized waste streams containing UTS
constituents. The 20 constituents listed in Exhibit 3-3 are expected to appear in one or more of
the six decharacterized waste-streams at the facility. A listing of the UTS constituents identified
in each decharacterized waste stream is provided in Attachment F-4. The only constituents in the
facility's effluent that are potentially subject to Phase III LDR are those constituents that origi-
nated in the decharacterized waste streams (i.e., those constituents listed in Attachment F-4). As
discussed above, twenty UTS constituents are contributed from decharacterized waste streams.
EXHIBIT 3-3
UTS CONSTITUENTS EXPECTED IN ICRT WASTEWATERS FROM FACILITY #1
acetone dichlqromethane
aldicarb methanol
barium methyl chloride
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate methyl isobutyl ketone
chlorobenzene naphthalene
chloroform nickel
copper pyridine
cyanide thiodicarb
o-dichlorobenzene triethyl amine
p-dichlorobenzene ' zinc
-------
F-39
Facility #l's NPDES permit conditions were identified by a search of the PCS. The
NPDES permit contains constituent-specific numeric limits for 75 constituents and physical
state/constituent monitoring-only requirements for seven physical parameters and one constituent.
These conditions are shown in Exhibit 3-4. Of the 75 constituents listed in the NPDES permit, 67
are UTS constituents and marked with an asterisk on Exhibit 3-4.
Nine UTS constituents, listed in Exhibit 3-5, are included in the facility's NPDES permit
and therefore, would not be subject to Phase III LDR. However, the remaining 11 UTS
constituents, listed in Exhibit 3-6, are not included in the facility's NPDES permit.
EXHIBIT 3-4
CONSTITUENTS AND CONDITIONS OF NPDES PERMIT FOR FACILITY #1
Constituents!
* 1,1,1 -trichloro-ethane
* 1.1,2-trichloro-ethane
*l,l-dichloroethane
* 1,1-dichloroethy lene
* 1,2,4-trichloro-benzene
* 1,2-dichlorobenzene
* 1,2-dichloroelhane
* 1,2-dichloropropane
* 1,2-trans-dichloro-ethylehe
* 1,3-dichlordbenzene
•1,3-dichloropropene, total weight
* 1,4-dichlorobenzene
•2,4-dichlorophenol
*2,4-dimethylphenol
*2,4-dinitrophenol
*2.4-dinitrotoluene
*2,6-dinitrotoluene
*2-chlorophenol
*2-nitrophenol
•3,4-benzofluoran-thene
*4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
*4-nitrpphenol
•acenaphthene
*acenaphthylene
*acrylonitrile
*anthracene
"benzene
*benzo(a)anthracene
*benzo(a)pyrene
*benzo(k)fluoranthene
*bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
*bromodichloromethane
*bromoform
*bromomethane
carbaryl, total
carbofuran
*carbon tetrachleride
carbon, total organic (TOC)
chloride (as Cl)
chlorine, total residual
"chlorobenzene
*chloroethane, total weight
*chloroform
•chrysene
coliform, fecal general
cyanide (as CN)
*di-N-butyl phthalate
•dibromochloromethane ,
*diethyl phthalate
•dimethyl phthalate
*ethylbenzene
*fluoranthene
*fluorene
•hexachlorobenzene
*hexachlorobuudiene
*hexachloroethane
isophorone
*lead, total (as Pb)
*methyl chloride
*methylene chloride
'naphthalene
•nitrobenzene
nitrogen, total ammonia (as N)
nitrogen, total kjeldahl (as N)
pH range excursions, >60 minutes
pH range excursions, monthly total
*phenanthrene
phenolics, total recoverable
*pyrene
solids, total suspended (TSS)
•tetrachloroe thy lene
•toluene
toxicity, ceriodaphnia acute
•trichloroethylene
•vinyl chloride
•zinc, total (as Zn) .
N/fnnitnring Requirement Only
BOD, 5-day (20°C)
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment
nitrite (total, plus nitrate as N)
oil and grease
oxygen demand, chemical (COD)
pH
Temperature, water (Deg. C)
toxicity, ceriodaphnia chronic
• UTS constituent.
-------
F-40
Since Facility #1 could be subject to the end-of-pipe treatment standards for those
constituents in Exhibit 3-6, the facility may choose one of the following courses of action:
1. The facility can determine that the 11 UTS constituents listed in Exhibit 3-6 were
considered during the development of the NPDES permit, but eliminated from
further consideration; or
2. The facility can seek a modification to their NPDES permit to include the 11 UTS
constituents; or
3. The facility can meet the end-of-pipe treatment standards for the 11 UTS
constituents.
Under the first option, the 11 UTS constituents listed in Exhibit 3-6 may have been
considered for inclusion in the NPDES permit in one of the following manners:
• The facility can show that the 11 UTS constituents were considered for a NPDES
permit because it is identified by one of four standard test methods required to be
completed to support a permit application: volatile test, acid compounds test,
base/neutral test, or pesticides. Only thiocarb (marked with an asterisk in Exhibit
3-6) is not identified in those test methods.
• The facility may have identified to the permit writer that the 11 UTS constituents
are constituents potentially expected in the effluent waste stream.
EXHIBIT 3-5
UTS CONSTITUENTS FOUND IN FACILITY NPDES PERMIT FOR FACILITY
aldicarb o-dichlorobenzene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate p-dichlorobenzene
chlorobenzene methyl chloride
chloroform naphthalene
cyanide
If thiobarb was identified by the generator and eliminated from the permit by the permit
writer, then it is not subject to Phase III LDR. If thiocarb was not identified by either the
generator or the permit writer, then the facility could choose to seek a modification of their
NPDES permit to include that constituent or be subject to the UTS. These modifications can take
a year or more to complete.
-------
F-41
EXHIBIT 3-6
UTS CONSTITUENTS NOT FOUND IN FACILITY
NPDES PERMIT FOR FACILITY #1
acetone nickel
barium pyridine
copper thiodicarb*
dichloromethane triethyl amine
methanol zinc
methvl isobutvl ketone
* Not included in the anticipated test methods listed in Attachment F-3
3.3.2 CASE STUDY FACILITY #2
Case Study Facility #2 is a carbamate or dye and pigment producing facility potentially
subject to Phase III LDR. Facility #2 has six decharacterized waste streams. Of these six
decharacterized waste streams, UTS constituents are not expected to be present in three of the
waste streams. A list of the UTS constituents expected in the individual decharacterized waste
streams is provided in Attachment F-4. In the remaining three decharacterized waste streams,
two UTS constituents, listed in Exhibit 3-7 below, are expected to appear in one or more of the
three decharacterized waste streams. The only constituents in the facility's effluent that are
potentially subject to Phase III LDR are those constituents that originated in the decharacterized
waste streams (i.e., those constituents listed in Attachment F-4). As discussed above, only two
UTS constituents, aniline and phenol, are contributed from decharacterized waste streams.
EXHIBITS-?
UTS CONSTITUENTS EXPECTED IN WASTEWATERS FROM FACILITY #2
I aniline phenol . ||
Facility #2's NPDES permit conditions were identified by a search of the PCS. The
NPDES permit contains constituent-specific numeric limits for 62 constituents and physical
state/constituent monitoring-only requirements for four physical states and one constituent.
These conditions are shown in Exhibit 3-8. Of the 63 constituents listed in the NPDES permit, 58
are UTS constituents and marked with an asterisk on Exhibit 3-8.
One UTS constituent, phenol, is included in the facility's NPDES permit and therefore,
would not be subject to Phase III LDR. However, the remaining UTS constituent, aniline, is not
included in the facility's NPDES permit.
-------
F-42
Chemical analysis for aniline is, however, anticipated in the permit application. Since it is
known to be present by the discharger and reporting of aniline is specifically required under
permit application procedures when they are known to be present (see Attachment F-3, Table 5).
If the facility did not identify aniline in their permit application, the facility could be subject to the
end-of-pipe treatment standards for aniline and therefore may need to seek a modification to their
NPDES permit or meet the end-of-pipe treatment standard for aniline.
EXHIBIT 3-8
CONSTITUENTS AND CONDITIONS OF NPDES PERMIT FOR FACILITY #2
* 1,1,1 -trichloro-ethane
* 1,1,2-trich!oro-ethane
* 1,1 -dichloroethane
* 1,1 -dichloroethy lene
* 1,2,4-trichloro-benzene
* 1,2-dichlorobenzene
* 1,2-dichloroethane
* 1,2-dichloropropane
*1,2-trans-dichloro-ethylene
*1,3-dichlorobenzene
* 1,3-dichloropropene, total weight
* 1,4-dichlorobenzene
*2,4-dichlorophenol
*2,4-dimethylphenol
*2,4-dinitrophenol
*2,4-dinitrotoluene
*2,6-d'mitrotoluene
*2-chlorophenol
*2-nitrophenol
*3,4-benzofluoran-thene
*4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
*4-nitrophenol
•acenaphthene
*acenaphthylene
*acrylonitrile
*anthracene
*benzene
*benzo(a)anthracene
*benzo(a)pyrene
*benzo(k)fluoranthene
*bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
*carbon tetrachloride
chlorine, total residual
"chlorobenzene
*chloroethane, total weight
*chloroform
*chrysene
coliform, fecal general
copper, total (as Cu)
*di-N-buryl phthalate
•diethyl phthalate
*dimethyl phthalate
*ethylbenzene
*fluoranthene
*fluorene
"hexachlorbbenzene
*hexachlorobutadiene
*hexachloroethane
*methyl chloride"
*methylene chloride
*naphthalene
*nickel, total (as Ni)
"nitrobenzene
*phenanthrene
*phenol, single compound
phenolics, total recoverable
*pyrene
*tetrachloroethylene
"toluene
*trichloroethylene
*vinyl chloride
*zinc, total (as Zn)
Monitoring Requirement Only!
aluminum, total (as Al)
BOD, 5-day (20 Deg. C)
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment
Temperature, water (Deg. C)
Temperature, water (Deg. F)
* UTS constituent.
3.3.3 CASE STUDY FACILITY #3
Case Study Facility #3 is a carbamate or dye and pigment producing facility potentially
subject to Phase III LDR. Facility #3 has six decharacterized waste streams containing UTS
constituents. A list of the UTS constituents expected in the individual decharacterized waste
streams is provided in Attachment F-4. The two constituents listed in Exhibit 3-9 are expected to
appear in one or more of the six decharacterized waste streams at Facility #3. The only
constituents in the facility's effluent that are potentially subject to Phase III LDR are those
constituents that originated in the decharacterized waste streams (i.e., those constituents listed in
-------
. F-43
Attachment F-4). As discussed above, only two UTS constituents, chromium and phenol, are
contributed from decharacterized waste streams.
EXHIBIT 3-9
UTS CONSTITUENTS EXPECTED IN ICRT WASTEWATERS FROM FACILITY #3
chromium phenol
Facility #3's NPDES permit conditions were identified by a search of the PCS. The
NPDES permit contains physical state/constituent-specific numeric limits for 69 constituents and
ten physical states. The NPDES permit contains physical state/constituent monitoring-only
requirements'for six constituents and two physical states. These conditions are shown in Exhibit
3-10. Of the 75 constituents listed in the NPDES permit, 68 are UTS constituents and marked
with an asterisk on Exhibit 3-10.
Both UTS constituents, phenol and chromium, are included in the facility's NPDES permit
and therefore, would not be subject to Phase III LDR.
3.3.4 CASE STUDY FACILITY #4
Case Study Facility #4 is a carbamate or dye and pigment producing facility potentially
subject to Phase III LDR. Facility #4 has eleven decharacterized waste streams. Of these eleven
decharacterized waste streams, UTS constituents are not expected to be present in three of the
waste streams. A list of the UTS constituents expected in the individual decharacterized waste
streams is provided in Attachment F-4. In the remaining eight decharacterized waste streams,
nine UTS constituents, listed in Exhibit 3-1.1 below, are expected to appear in one or more of the
eight decharacterized waste streams. The only constituents in the facility's effluent that are
potentially subject to Phase III LDR are those constituents that originated in the decharacterized
waste streams (i.e., those constituents listed in Attachment F-4). As discussed above, nine UTS
constituents, acetone, aniline, carbendizum, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, phenol,
o-phenylenediamine, pyridine, and xylene, are contributed from decharacterized waste streams.
-------
. F-44
EXHIBIT 3-10
CONSTITUENTS AND CONDITIONS OF NPDES PERMIT FOR FACILITY #3
* 1,1,1 -trichloro-ethane
* 1,1,2-trichloro-ethane
* 1,1 -dichloroethane
* 1,1 -dichloroethylene
.*! ,2,4-trichloro-benzene
* 1,2-dichlorobenzene
*1,2-dichloroethane
*1,2-dichloropropane
•1,2-trans-dichloro-ethylene
•1,3 -dichlorobenzene
*l,3-dichloropropene, total weight
*l,4-dichlorobenzene
•2,4-dichlorophenol
*2,4-dimethylphenol
*2,4-dinitrophenol
*2,4-dinitrotoluene
*2,6-dinitrotoluene
*2-chlorophenol
*2-nitrophenol
*4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
*4-nitrophenol
*acenaphthene
*acenaphthylene
*acrylonitrile
*amhracene
*arsenic, total (as As)
*benzene
*benzo(a)anthracene _
*benzo(a)pyrene
*benzo(b)fluoranthene (3,4-benzo)
*benzo(k)fluoranthene
*beryllium, total (as Be)
*bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
'"cadmium, total (as Cd)
"carbon tetrachloride
carbon, tot organic (TOC)
chem oxygen demand (COD)% removal
*chlorobenzene
*chloroethane, total weight
"chloroform
chromium, hexavalent (as Cr)
*chromium, total (as Cr)
chromium, trivalent (as Cr)
*chrysene
copper, total (as Cu)
"cyanide, total (as CN)
*di-N-butyl phthalate
•diethyl phthalate
*dimethyl phthalate
*ethylbenzene
*fluoranthene
*fluorene
*hexachlorobenzene
*hexachlorobutadiene
*hexachloroethane
iron, total (as Fe)
*lead, total (as Pb)
* methyl chloride
*methylene chloride
'naphthalene
•nickel, total (as Ni)
•nitrobenzene
nitrogen, ammonia total (as N) .
oil and grease from freon extr-grav meth
oxygen demand, chem (high level)
oxygen demand, ultimate
oxygen, dissolved (DO)
PH
"phenanthrene
*phenol, single compound
*pyrene
solids, total dissolved
solids, total dissolved - 180 deg. C
solids, total suspended
•tetrachloroethylene
•toluene
•trichloroethylene
•vinyl chloride
*zinc, total (as Zn)
Monitoring Requirement Only
* 1,2-diphenyl-hydrazine
aluminum, total (as Al)
benzidine
?bis(2-chloro-isopropyl)ether
*bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
BOD, 5-day (20 Deg. C)
•butyl benzyl phthalate
Flow, in conduit or thru treatment
* UTS constituents.
-------
F-45
EXHIBIT 3-11
UTS CONSTITUENTS EXPECTED IN ICRT WASTEWATERS FROM FACILITY #4
acetone phenol
aniline o-phenylenediamine
carbendizum pyridine
methanol xylene
methvl ethvl ketone
Facility #4's NPDES permit conditions were identified by a search in the PCS. The
NPDES permit contains constituent-specific numeric limits for 63 constituents and physical
state/constituent monitoring-only requirements for three physical states and six constituent.
These conditions are shown in Exhibit 3-12. Of the 63 constituents listed in the NPDES permit,
57 are UTS constituents and marked with an asterisk on Exhibit 3-12. Two constituents,
ammonia nitrogen and kjeldahl nitrogen, are neither listed on NPDES industry-required testing
lists nor are UTS constituents, and are marked with a double asterisk.
Three UTS constituents, phenol, carbenzidum, and o-phenylenediamine are included in the
facility's NPDES permit and therefore, would not be subject to Phase III LDR. However, the
remaining six UTS constituents, acetone, aniline, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, and
xylene^ are not included in the facility's NPDES permit.
Chemical analysis for acetone, aniline, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, and xylene,
is however anticipated in the permit application. Since it is known to be present by the discharger
and reporting of these UHCs is specifically required under permit application procedures when it
is known to be present (see Attachment F-3). If the facility did not identify acetone, aniline,
methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, and xylene in their permit application, the facility could
be subject to the end-of-pipe treatment standards for these UHC and therefore may need to seek a
modification to their NPDES permit to include aniline or meet the end-of-pipe treatment standard.
Since Facility #4 is potentially subject to the end-of-pipe treatment standards, the facility
may choose the following hierarchy or course of action:
Step 1. The facility determines if acetone, aniline, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone,
pyridine, and xylene were considered during the development of the
NPDES permit, but eliminated from further consideration;
Step 2. If Step 1 is not applicable, the facility seeks a modification to their NPDES
permit to include acetone, aniline, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine,
. and xylene; or
-------
F-46
EXHIBIT 3-12
CONSTITUENTS AND CONDITIONS OF NPDES PERMIT FOR FACILITY #4
* 1,1,1 -trichloro-ethane
* 1,1,2-trichloro-ethane
.* 1,1 -dichloroethane
* 1,1 -dichloroethylene
* 1,2,4-trichloro-benzene
* 1,2-dichlorobenzene
*l ,2-dichloroethane, total weight
* 1,2-dichloropropane
* 1,2-trans-dichloro-ethy lene
*1,3-dichlorobenzene
*l,3-dichloropropene, total weight
* 1,4-dichlorobenzene
*2,4-dichlorophenol
*2,4-dimethylphenol
*2,4-dinitrophenol
*2,4-dinitrotoluene
*2,6-dinitrotoluene
*2-chlorophenol
*2-nitrophenol
*3,4-benzofluoran-thene
*4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
*4-nitrophenol
*acenaphthene
*acenaphthylene
*acrylonitrile
aluminum, total (as Al)
*anthracene
*benzene
*benzo(a)anthracene
*benzo(a)pyrene
*benzo(k)fluoranthene
*bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
*carbon tetrachloride
chlorine, total residual
*chlorobenzene
*chloroethane, total weight
*chloroform
*chrysene
coliform, fecal general
copper, total (as Cu)
"cyanide, total (as CN)
*di-N-butyl phthalate
*diethyl phthalate
•dimethyl phthalate
*ethylbenzene
*fluoranthene
*fluorene
*hexachlorobenzene
*hexachlorobutadiene
*hexachloroethane
*methyl chloride
*methylene chloride
'naphthalene
'nitrobenzene
**nitrogen, ammonia (as N)
**nitrogen, kjeldahl (as N)
*phenanthrene
*phenol, single compound
*pyrene
*tetrachloroethylene
*toluene
*trichloroethylene
*vinyl chloride
Mnnitnring Rgqnirament Only
PH
total suspended solids (TSS)
oil and grease
nitrite (plus nitrate, as N)
total organic carbon (TOC)
chloride (as Cl)
chlorine, total residual
flow, in conduit or thru treatment
bioassay (48 hour)
*UTS constituent.
Step 3. If Step 2 is not applicable, the facility meets the end-of-pipe treatment standards
for acetone, aniline, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, and xylene.
If acetone, aniline, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, or xylene were identified by
the generator anyway and eliminated from the permit by the permit writer, then these constituents
are not subject to UTS. Finally, if acetone, anilene, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, or
xylene were not identified by either the generator or the permit writer, then the facility could
choose another option (i.e., seek a modification of their NPDES permit to include acetone,
anilene, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, and xylene or be subject to UTS).
If the facility does not seek a modification of their NPDES permit to include acetone,
anilene, methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, pyridine, or xylene, and therefore would be required to
meet the end-of-pipe treatment standard, the facility would need to compare the effluent
concentration of these constituents to UTS. If the acetone, anilene, methanol, methyl ethyl
ketone, pyridine, or xylene concentrations meet the UTS treatment standards, then these
-------
F-47
constituents would no longer be subject to UTS. If the acetone, anilene, methanol, methyl ethyl
ketone, pyridine, or xylene concentrations do not meet the UTS, then the facility would have to
treat the wastewater to meet UTS, consider segregating the decharacterized wastes containing
these constituents, implement pollution prevention, or use other methods to achieve UTS.
-------
ATTACHMENT F-l
NATION-WIDE PCS/UTS COMPARISON
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for all Industries
UTS Constituents
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1,1,1,2-Tetrachlorocthane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1.2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1.2-Dibromoethane/Ethylene dibromide
1,2 -D ichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1,4-Dioxane
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyaceticacid/2,4,5-T
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4-D
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-DichJorophcnol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
3 -Chloropropy lene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Acrylonithle
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Aniline
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
1
206
46
5
55
90
114
6
24
5
104
22
27
1
33
35
1
69
67
11
388
35
33
12
389
1
7
6
62
369
0
384
5
39
39
22
1
29
38
54
19
4
34
88
337
0
158
123
1
125
135
133
24
120
3
138
112
113
2
7
10
1
123
110
14
531
116
8
106
533
0
110
101
114
499
1
536
103
115
103
9
0
140
124
109
131
1
107
341
1106
1
364
169
6
180
225
247
30
144
8
242
134
140
3
40
45
2
192
177
25
919
151
41
118
922
1
117
107
176
868
1
920
108
154
142
31
I
169
162
163
150
5
141
429
1443
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for all Industries
UTS Constituents
Barium
Bendiocaib phenol
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h»i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Beryllium
beta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbofuran phenol
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chromium (Total)
Chrysene
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropy lene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Cyanides (Total)
Cyclohexanone
delta-BHC
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
D i-n-propylnitrosamine
Dibenz(a,e)pyrcne
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
94
368
79
1611
81
78
65
77
66
16
24
29
96
28
7
10
916
1
1
368
1
77
55
106
1
26
36
210
30
747
38
2
702
702
0
4
51
7
3
48
68
1
9
56
43
39
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
316
. 499
141 .
293
141
140
137
140
402
128
99
, H2
185
129
101
118
1946
0
2
499
0
127
128
135
1
117
117
192
89
1658
106
72
905
905
1
104
118
104
103
35
137
1
9
128
120
111
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
410
867
220
1904
222
218
202
217
468
144
123
141
281
157'
108
128
2862
1
3
867
1
204
183
241
- ,2
143
153
402
119
2405
144
74
1607
1607
1
108
169
111
106
83
205
2
18
184
163
150
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for all Industries
UTS Constituents
D ipheny Initrosamine
Dithiocaibamates (total)
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl ether
Ethylene oxide
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Fluoride
gamma-BHC N
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopcntadicne
Hexachloroethane
HxCDDs (All Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
HxCDFs (All Hexachlorodibenzofurans)
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene
Isobutyl alcohol
Lead
m-Cresol
m-Dichlorobenzene
Mercury - All Others
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Methanol
Methomyl
Methoxychlor
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl parathion
Methylene chloride
n-Butyl alcohol
o-Cresol
o-Dichlorobenzene
o-Nitroaniline
o-Nitrophenol
p.p'-DDD
p.p'-DDE
p,p'-DDT
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
28
1
10
5
7
62
11
0
961
0
1
71
38
200
44
48
16
51
42
28
36
0
0
68
1
1557
368
53
712
712
1
0
12
14
6
0
0
183
0
369
61
1
372
31
28
53
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
111
0
77
75
93
128
7
1
216
I
0
143
111
274
125
129
105
140
118
108
120
1
1
139
0
2140
499
116
1552
1552
1
1
21
6
7
1
1
156
1
499
117
0
539
105
105
130
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
139
1
87
80
100
190
18
1
1177
1
1
214
149
474
169
177
121
191
160
136
156
1
1
207
1
3697
867
169
2264
2264
. 2
1
33
20
13
1
1
339
1
868
178
1
911
136
133
183
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for all Industries
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
p-Chloro-m-cresol 53 104 157
p-Cresol 423 502 925
p-Dichlorobenzene . ~ • 87 105 192 • •
p-Nitrophenol 380 538 918
Pyiene 37 113 150
Pyridine 01 1
Selenium 225 806 1031
Silver 536 969 1505
Silvex/2,4,5-TP 12 2 14
Sulfide 76 - 33 109
TCDDs (All Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins) 0 11
TCDFs (All Teirachlorodibenzofurans) 0 11,
Tetrachloroethy.lene 232 170 402
Thallium 59 358 417
Toluene • 1334 286 1620
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 205 313 518
Toxaphene 63 119 182
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene 108 134 242
trans-l,3-Dichloropropylene 03 3
Tribromomethane/Bromoform 16 107 123
Trichloroethylene , 262 164 426
Trichloromonofluoromethane 8 13 21
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl) phosphate 0 1 I
Vanadium 8 5 13
Vinyl chloride 115 135 250
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p-xyle 1087 2 \0
-------
ATTACHMENT F-2
INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC PCS/UTS COMPARISON
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NO INDUSTRY SPECIFIED
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
p-Nitrophenol 3 0 3
Bendiocarb phenol 101
p-Nitrophenol 1 0 1
o-Cresol 1 0 1
alpha-BHC • 19 131 150
o-Cresol 369 499 868
Bendiocarb phenol 368 499 867
Aldrin 54 109 163
Antimony .1 0 1
p,p'-DDD I 0 1
p.p'-DDE 28 105 133
p!p'-DDE 1 0 1
m-Dichlorobenzene 53 116 169
m-Cresol 2 0 2
p,p'-DDT 53 130 183
p,p'-DDT 1 0 I
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene 108 134 242.
n-Butyl alcohol 0 1 1
p-Cresol 1 0 1
o-Nitrophenol 202
Arsenic 3 0 3
Barium 94 316 410
p-Chloro-m-cresol 53 104 157
Arsenic 14 0 14
o-Nitr.ophenol 101
Antimony • . 2 0 2
o-Nitrophenol ' 372 .539 911
p.p'-DDD 31 105 136
p-Cresol 202
p-Dichlorobenzene -87 105 192
o-Dichlorobenzene 61 117 178
Barium 1 0 1
Barium ' 112
p-Nitrophenol 380 538 918
o-Cresol 2 0 2
Arsenic 337 1106 1443
p-Cresol 423 502 925
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 96 185 281
Acenaphthylene 39 103 142
delta-BHC 4 104 108
cis-l,3-Dichloropropylene 2 72 74
m-Cresol 1 01
Acetone 22 9 31
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NO INDUSTRY SPECIFIED
UTS Constituents
Acetooithle
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phlhalate
Anthracene
delta-BHC
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Acenaphthylene
bis(2-ChIoroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
beta-BHC
Acrylonitrile
beta-BHC
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzene
Aniline
Aldhn
alpha-BHC
Acrolein
Bendiocarb phenol
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl) phosphate
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthene
m-Cresol
gamma-BHC
Antimony
Benz(a)anthracene
Anthracene
gamma-BHC
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Benzo(a)pyTene
Benzene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
Benzene
Dibromomethane
Chloroform
Beryllium
Chloroethane
Cyanides (Amenable)
Bromodichloromethane
Dieldrin
Cyanides (Amenable)
Chromium (Total)
Chromium (Total)
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
I
I
34
1
-0
1
29
24
1
38
16
2
1611
4
I
1
29
2
0
39
1
368
1
88
79
1
44
2
55
81
3
68
1
1
1
14
0
36
1
28
56
1
747
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
0
107
0
1
0
112
99
0
124
128
I
293
1
0
0
140
0
1
115
0
499
0
341
141
0
125
0
128
141
0
137
0
0
I
0
1
117
2
129
128
0
1658
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
I
141
I
1
1
141
123
1
162
144
3
1904
5
1
1
169
2
1
154
1
867
1
429
220
I
169
2
183
222
. .3
205
1
1
2
14
1
153
3
157
184
I
2405
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NO INDUSTRY SPECIFIED
UTS Constituents
ChJorobcnzene
Cadmium
Benzo(b)fluoranihene ~
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(a)pyrene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Caibofuran phenol
Cyclohexanone
Cyanides (Total)
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Caibofuran
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Cyanides (Total)
Chloroform
Carbaryl
Cadmium
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Cadmium
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Beryllium
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Caibofuran phenol
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Caibofuran phenol
Chrysene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Bromomethanc/Methyl bromide
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Chromium (Total)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Chlorobenzilate
Chromium (Total)
Diphenylnitrosamine
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
106
1
2
65
9
1
2
51
368
0
1
7
1
1
3
702
210
1
916
30
4
48
66
2
77
78
2
2
2
1
1
702
7
39
77
38
7
10
43
26
1
1
2
28
No. of Permits Total No. of
With Monitoring Permits With
Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
135
0
1
137
9
0
1
118
499
1
2 .
104
2
1
103
905
192
0
1946
89
3
35
402
1
127
140
1
0
1
0
0
905
101
111
140
106
3
118
120
117
0
1
0
111
241
1
3
202
18
1
3
169
867
1
3
111
3
2
106
1607
402
1
2862
119
7
83
468'
3
204
218
3
2
3
1
I
1607
108
150
217
144
10
128
163
143
1
2
2
139
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NO INDUSTRY SPECIFIED
UTS Constituents
Dimethyl phthalate
Cadmium ^
Fluoride
HeptachJor
Tetrachloroethylene
Selenium
Silver
Methoxychlor
Ethyl benzene
Thallium
Fluorene
Lead
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Isobutyl alcohol
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Hexachlorobutadiene
Thallium
Thallium
Toluene
Heptachlor epoxide
Lead
Ethyl benzene
Heptachlor
Lead
Methanol
Silvex/2,4,5-TP
Fluorene
Pyrene
Fluoranthene
Hexachlorobenzene
Sulfide
Methylene chloride
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Methylene chloride
Hexachloroethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Pyrene
Thallium
HxCDDs (All Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
Tetrachloroethylene
HxCDFs (All Hexachlorodibenzofurans)
Selenium
Methylene chloride
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
I
16
200
48
5
1
536
12
4
59
1
1557
3
1
I
7
42
1
0
1334
16
17
961
1
1
1
12
38
37
1
51
76
1
28
2
36
14
1
1
0
232
0
225
183
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
2
274
129
0
2
969
21
0
358
0
2140
2
0
0
0
118
0
1
286
105
2
216
0
0
1
2
111
113
0
140
33
0 -
108
0 .
120
6
0
0
1
170
1
806
156
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
18
474
177
5
3
1505
33
4
417
1
3697
5
1
1
7
160
1
1
1620
121
1?
1177
I
1
2
14
149
150
1
191
109
1
136
2
156
20
I
I
1
402
1
1031
339
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NO INDUSTRY SPECIFIED
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Indeno (1.2,3-c,d) pyrene 68 139 207
Fluorantherie 71 143 214
Methyl isobutyl ketone 6 7 13
Silver 2 I 3
Ethyl ether .0 1 1
Indeno (1,2,3-c.d) pyrene , 2 1 3
Heptachlor epoxide 1 0 1
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 712 1552 2264
Lead . 9 4 13
Toluene . 1 -0 1
Endosulfanll 1 0.1
Endrin 62 128 190
Toluene 303
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 0 I 1
Fluoride 202
Toxaphene 63 ll9 182
Mercury - All Others 3 2 5
Endrin aldehyde 11 7 18
Endosulfan sulfate 7 93 100
Endosulfanll 5 75 80
Mercury - All Others . , 1 0 1
Endosulfan I 10 77 87
Endosulfan I 10 1
Endrin 1 0 1
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 205 313 518
Mercury - All Others 712 1552 2264
Endosulfan sulfate 1 01
Mercury - All Others 7 07
Toluene 1 0 1
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1 0 1
1,2-Dichloropropane 22 112 134
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4,5-T . 1 1 2
2,4-Dinitrophenol 388 531 919
1,2-Dichloroethanc 104 138 242
TCDDs (All Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins) 0 1 1
1,2-Dibromoethane/Ethylenedibromide 5 3 8
1,1,2,2-Tetracnloroethaiic 46 123 169
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-t m-, and p-xyle 1087 2 l°vf
1.1,2-Trichloroethane 1 0 ' 1
Vinyl chloride 1 0 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 55 125 180
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2 0 2
2,4-Dinitrbtoluene 35 116 151
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane 5 1 6
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NO INDUSTRY SPECIFIED
UTS Constituents
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
TCDFs (All Tetrachiurodibenzofurans)
Vanadium
2-Chlorophenol
2-4-Dimethyl phenol •
2-Chloronaphlhalene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4-D
Trichloromonofluoromethane
Trichloroethylene
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2,3,4,6-Tetiachlorophenol
1,4-Dioxane
1,2,4,5-Telrachlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
' 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dipheny Ihydrazine
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
Zinc
Zinc
Zinc
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1,1-Dichloroetnane
Toxaphene
Zinc
1,1-Dichloroethane
Tribromomethane/Bromofonn
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
206
35
3
114
262
.115
0
8
62
389
6
7
2
11
8
4
1
369
2
33
1
6
67
24
27
1
2
1280
11
33
I
12
90
1
17
2
16
69
2
5
1
384
No. of Permits Total No. of
With Monitoring Permits With
Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
0
158
10
0
133
164
135
1
5
114
533
101
110
0
14
13
0
0
499
0
7
2
24
110
120
113
0
0
2206
5
8
0
106
135
0
3
0
107
123
0
103
0
536
• 1
364
45
3
247
426
250
1
13
176
922
107
117
2
25
21
4
I
868
2
40
3
30
177
144
140
1
2
3486
16
41
I
118
225
1
20
2
123
192
2
108
1
920
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ALUMINUM FORMING
UTS Constituents
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
Chromium (Total)
Cyanides (Total)
Cyanides (Amenable)
Cadmium
Benzene
Silver
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isoaicrs, or all Aroclo
Lead
Zinc
1,2-Dichloroethane
14
11
11
2
0
2
1
3
14
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
14
11
11
2
1
3
1
4
14
1
m-Cresol
o-Nitrophenol
p-Nitrophenol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
Bendiocarb phenol
Carbofuran phenol
Chromium (Total)
Cyanides (Total)
Benzene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Lead
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
Vinyl chloride
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Zinc
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
0
1
I
1
1
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arsenic
Antimony
Chrysene
Chromium (Total)
Benzene
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Mercury • All Others
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Silver
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: BATTERY MANUFACTURING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Toluene 2 0 2
Lead 11 ' 0 11
Ethyl benzene 2 0 2
Vinyl chloride . 1 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-. m-, and p- xyle 0 2 1
Zinc 5 05
1,1,1-Trichloroethane . 10 I
Antimony ° 1.1.
o-Cresol 0 11
p-Nitrophenol 0 '1 - 1 , .
Barium 0 1 1
Bendiocarb phenol • 0 I 1
m-Cresol 0 I 1
o-Nitrophenol .0 1 1
p-Cresbl 0 11
Arsenic 0 2 2
Chromium (Total) 3 25
Carbofuran phenol 0,1 1
Beryllium 0 1 1
Cadmium 1 2 3
Benzene 10 1
Cyanides (Amenable) .1 1 2
Cyanides (Total) 1 1 . 2
Fluoride 0 11
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort .0 2 2
Sulfide . 10 1
Toluene 1 0 1
Silver 0 2 2
Ethyl benzene 1 0 1
Lead 1 2 3
Selenium 1 2 3
Thallium 0 1 I
Mercury - All Others 0 2 2
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-,m-, and p- xyle 1 0 I
Vanadium 0 11
2-4-Dimethyl phenol Oil
2,4-Dinitrophenol 0 1 1
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 0 1 1
Zinc 3 1 4
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 0 11
m-Cresol 1 1 2
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents included in NPDES Permits for: COAL MINING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits. Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
o-Nitrophenol 112
Bendiocarb phenol 112
Arsenic 05 5
p-Cresol 1.2
Barium 0 1
o-Cresol 12
Antimony 0 1
p-Nitrophenol 1 2
Cadmium l 8 9
Chromium (Total) 1 67
Carbofuran phenol 1 1 2
Cyanides (Total) . . 11 2
Benzene 0 11
Cyanides (Amenable) 1 1 2
Mercury - All Others 1 5 6
Selenium 0 3 3
Lead . 08 8
Ethyl benzene 0 I I
Thallium , 0 11
Silver 13 4
Sulfide 1 1 2
Mercury - Nonwastewater firom Retort 1 5 6
Fluoride 0 -2 2
Toluene 0 1 1
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 112
Zinc 3 11 14
Xylenes-mixedisomers(sumofo-, m-, andp-xyle 01 /
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 1 2
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1 2
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 1 2
p-Nitrophenol 01
p-Cresol 0 1
Barium 0-1
m-Cresol " 10 1
Bendiocarb phenol 101
o-Nitrophenol 1 0 1
o-Cresol 1 0 1
Cadmium 1 0 1
Chromium (Total) 2 13
Carbofuran phenol 1 0 1
Cyanides (Amenable) 2 0 2
Cyanides (Total) 2 0 2
Mercury - All Others 1 01
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: COIL COATING
UTS Constituents
Lead
Fluoride
Selenium
Suifidc
Ethyl benzene
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Toluene
Silver
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
Zinc
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-sec-Buryl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
m-Cresol
m-Dichlorobenzene •
Bendiocarb phenol
o-Cresol
p-Nitrophenol
p-Dichlorobenzene
p-Cresol
o-Dichlorobenzene
o.-Nilrophenol
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chloroform
Chromium (Total)
Cyanides (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
Benzene
Beryllium
Chlorobenzene
Cadmium
Cyanides (Amenable)
Methylene chloride •
Sulfide
Fluoride
Ethyl benzene
Silver
Toluene
Lead
Zinc
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-sec-Butyl-4.6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
10
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
0
I
3
1
3
1
7
11
1
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
o'
0
0
0
1
0
I
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
I
*
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
4
1
1
/
1
1
1
1
1
I
1 .
1
1
1
1
1
10
4
1
1
1
1
5
4
1
1
3
1
3
1
7
12
I
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: COPPER FORMING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 1 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomcrs (sum of o-, m-, andp- xyie 1 0 |
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol I 0 1
Benzene 1 0 1
Chromium (Total) 2 13
Cadmium 0 • • 2 2
Mercury - All Others 0 11
Ethyl benzene 1 01
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 0 1 . 1
Lead 0 2 2
Toluene • 10 1
Zinc 336
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, andp-xyle 1 0 /
o-Dichlorobenzene 2 • • 0 '2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethy.lene 4 0 4
Barium 1 0 1
Antimony 1 "12
Arsenic 4 0 4
Chlorobenzene 1 0 1
Bromodichloromethane 1 0 1
Benzene 0 11
Beryllium 1 01
Chromium (Total) 11 0 11
Chloroform 0 1 1
Cyanides (Amenable) ' 5 1 6
Cadmium 5 0 .5
Cyanides (Total) 5 I 6
Fluoride 10 0 .10
Methylene chloride 202
Thallium 1.0 1
Mercury - AU Others 202
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 202
Lead 11 1 12
Tetrachloroethylene 505
Selenium 1 0 1
Toluene 3 0 3
Sulfide 10 1
Ethyl benzene 112
Silver 5 05
Vinyl chloride 303
Trichloroethylene 6 2 8
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ELECTRICAL & ELEC COMPONENT
UTS Constituents
1,1-Dichloroethane
1.1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Zinc
Vanadium
1,2-Dichloroethane
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-. m-. and p- xyle
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1 -Tnchloroethane
Arsenic
o-Cresol
Acrylonitrile
o-Nitrpphenol
Bendiocarb phenol
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene :
Benz(a)anthracene
m-Dichlorbbenzene
Acenaphthene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Acenaphthylene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
p,p'-DDT
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Cresol
p-Nitrophenol
m-Cresol
Anthracene
Barium
Chloroform
Cyanides (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
BenzoOOfluoranthene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Chrysene
Chromium (Total)
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Cadmium
Chloroethane
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
1
10
1
3
0
1
3
4
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
I
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
I
11
I
3
f
1
3
5
3
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
I.
3
1
3
1.
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: EXPLOSIVES MANUFACTURING
UTS Constituents
Chlorobenzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Diethyl phthalate
Fluorene
Pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Fluoride
Selenium
Silver
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
Lead
Mercury - All Others
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Tetrachloroethylene
Diphenylnitrosamine
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Fluoranthene
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Methylene chloride
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloropropane
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Trichloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Zinc
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2-sec-Butyl-4.6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2-Chlorophenol
1,1-Dichloroethane '
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
m-Dichlorobenzene
Antimony
Acenaphthene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
7
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
2
3
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
2
0
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
2
9
4
4
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
8
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: FERTILIZER MANUFACTURING
UTS Constituents
Anthracene
o-Nitrophenoi
Arsenic
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Acenaphthylene
Acrylonitrile
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
p-Nitrophenol
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chlorobenzene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chloroform
Benzene
Cadmium
Dimethyl phthalate
Chrysene
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chloroethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Chromium (Total)
Carbon tetrachloride
Beryllium
Cyanides (Amenable)
Diethyl phthalate
Cyanides (Total)
Thallium
Fluorene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Mercury - All Others
Toluene
Selenium
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Fluoride
Silver
Pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Lead
Ethyl benzene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Tetrachloroethylene
Fluoranthene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
0
2
2
2
0
2
2
1
. 3
0
1
20
1
2
. 2
2
2
0
3
2
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
0
2
0
0
0 ,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
0
0
- 0
0
0
3
0
2
1
0
1
2
0
0
2
1
2
2
0
2
0
0
6
0
1
0
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 .
2
2
2
• 3
8
2
2
2
2
2
13 ,
2
2
3
. 2
3
2
2
2
3
4
2
' 3
20
3
2
2
8
2
1
3
2
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: FERTILIZER MANUFACTURING
UTS Constituents
Methylene chloride
Hexachloroethane
Vinyl chloride —
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Zinc
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
1,2-0 ichloroethane
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1.2 -Dichloropropane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Chlorophenol
Toxaphene
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethy lene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
p-Nitrophenol
Bendiocarb phenol
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
o-Nitrophenol
p-Cresol
Chromium (Total)
Carboniran phenol
Cadmium
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Lead
Sulfidc
Mercury • All Others
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoscb
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Zinc
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
2
2
2
2
11
2
0
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
< 1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
0
0
0
7
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
2
2
2
2
18
2
/
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
•;
20
1
Acrylonitrile
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: GLASS MANUFACTURING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Accnaphthenc 1 0 1
Acetone 1 0 1
Benz(a)anthracene 1 0 1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 101
o-Nitiophenol . 3 14
p-Cresol ' -. ' 31 4
Bendiocarb phenol ' 3 1 4
Antimony 1 I 2
m-Cresol 3 1 4
o-Cresol 3 1 4
p-Nitrophenol . 3 14
Arsenic 7 3 10
Chromium (Total) 8 4 12
Carbofuranphenol 3 14
Cyanides (Amenable) 0 1 1
Benzene . 101
Chrysene 101
Beryllium 1 1 .2
Cadmium 4 4 8
Cyanides (Total) 0 11
Diphenylnitrosamine 10 1
Mercury - All Others 1 1 2
Silver 5 38
Toluene 1 01
Fluoride 9 4 13
Selenium 3 2 5
Lead 12 7 19
Thallium ' , 1 0 1
Tetrachloroethylene 1 0 1
Fluorene 1 01
Sulfide 2 . 2 4
Mercury - Nonwastewater firom Retort 1 1 2
1,1-Dichloroethane 1 0 ,1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 0 I
Xylenes-mixcd isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle 1 0 /
Trichloroethylene 2 0 2
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 3 1 4
2,4-Dinitrophenol . 3 1 4
Zinc 14 4 18
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 4 1 5 •
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 1
4,6-Dinitro-o-crcsol 3 1 4 t
o-Nitrophenol 101
11/21/9S
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: GRAIN MILLS
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
o-Cresol ' 101
p-Cresol .1 0 ' 1
Arsenic 1 2 3
p-Nitrophenol 1 0 1
Bendiocarb phenol 10 1
o-Dichlorobenzene 1 0 I
Benzene 202
Barium 1 ° l
irans-l,2-Dichloroethylene 0 1 1
m-Cresol 1 ° 1
Carbofuran phenol 10 1
Cadmium ' 1 34
Cyanides (Amenable) 1 0 1
Chromium (Total) 1 0 1
Cyanides (Total) 1 0 1
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort .1 0 1
Mercury - All Others 10 1
Selenium 2 02
Lead 2 1 3
Silver 1 01
Sulfide 11 2
Fluoride 2 02
Ethyl benzene 2 0 2
Toluene 20 2
Zinc 43 7
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 1 0 1
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0 1 1
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 1 0
Trichloroethylene 1 0
Xylenes-mixedisomers(sumofo-, m-, andp-xyle 2 0
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1 0
1,1-Dichloroethane 0 1
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 1 °
p-Chloro-m-cresol 1 ° 1
o-Nitrophenol 3 1 4
Acrylonitrile 1 ° . l
p-Cresol 213
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 1 0 1
o-Dichlorobenzene 10 1
Acenaphthylene 10 I
Acenaphthene 1 0 1
o-Cresol 2 13
p-Nitrophenol 314
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: GUM & WOOD CHEMICALS MANUF
UTS Constituents
trans-1,2-D ichloroethy lene
m-Dichlorobenzene
m-Cresol
p-D ichlorobenzene
Bendiocarb phenol
Benz(a)anthracene
Anthracene
Chioromethane/Methyl chloride
Chloroethane
Benzo(ajpyrene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Chloroform
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chromium (Total)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Diethyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzene
Chrysene
Cyanides (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Tetrachloroethylene
Pyrene
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
Hexachlorobenzene
Methylene chloride
Hexachloroethane
Fluorene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Fluoranthene
Mercury - All Others
Sulfide
Lead
Trichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1.1-Dichloroethylene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
1
2
I
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
2
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
0
I
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
I
1
I
1
1
. I
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
•
I
1
2
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary °f UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: GUM & WOOD CHEMICALS MANUF
UTS Constituents
Vinyl chloride
2 -sec-Buty 1-4,6-diuiUophenol/Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Toxaphene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2-ChJorophenol
Zinc
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1.1-Dichloroe thane
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
1,2-Dichloropropane
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
• 2
4
1
1
1
1
I
.2
3
1
1
3
1
3
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
I
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
3
5
I
I
1
1
1
2
3
. 1
I
4
1
4
p-D ichlorobenzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Acenaphthylene
p-Chlorc-m-cresol
Anthracene
p-Nitrophenol
Acetone
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
p-Cresol
o-D ichlorobenzene
Acetonitrile
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
Bendiocarb phenol
Acenaphthene
o-Cresol
m-Dichlorobenzene
cis-1,3 -Dichloropropy lene
delta-BHC
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
p,p'-DDD
gamma-BHC
Antimony
p.p'-DDD
Benz(a)anthraccne
p.p'-DDT
m-Cresol
p.p'-DDE
Arsenic
18
13
13
0
13
27
1
0
15
17
0
0
14
13
14
17
0
0
17
0
0
8
0
15
0
14
0
25
1
4
1
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
1
1
5
1
5
1
1
1
2
2
1
4
2
0
2
5
2
6
19
17
14
1
14
31
2
1
20
18
I
1
19
14
19
18
I
1
19
2
1
12
2
15
2
19
2
31
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: INORGANIC CHEM MANUFACTURI
UTS Constituents
Aniline
beta-BHC
Acrylonithle
Barium
o-Nitrophenol
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Bromodichloro methane
Diethyl phthalate
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene r
^ChromiumXTotal)
^
Carbon disulfide
Butyl benzyl phthalate
XBenzo(k)fluoranthene
XChrysene
X Dimethyl phthalate
\Cyanides (Amenable)
^Benzo(b)fluoranthene
^Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
\Cyanides (Total)
XCarbofuran phenol
ABenzo(a)pyTene
^Chloroform
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Beryllium
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
>\Di-n-butyl phthalate
Dieldhn
yCarbon tetrachloride
/ Cadmium
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloroc thane
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Toxaphene
Hexachlorobenzene
Sulfide
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
0
16
6
27
0
0
18
3
0
3
' 13
3
70
24
1
I
15
13
13
29
15
17
0
29
14
15
25
3
0
3
3
13
0
21
29
0
0
17
23
1
0
18
9
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
1
0
3
4
1
2
I
1
2
2
2
0
15
4
0
1
0
I
1
6
0
1
1
6.
5
0
4
0
1
6
1
2
1
3
12
1
1
1
5
0
1
" 1
4
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
I
1
16
9
31
1
2
19
4
2
5
15'
3
85
28
1
2
15
14
14
35
15
18
1
35
19
15
29
3
1
9
4
15
1
24
41
1
1
18
28
I
I
19
13
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: INORGANIC CHEM MANUFACTURI
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Methyl methacrylate 0 1 1
Pyrene 13 1 14
Fluoranthene 13 1 14
Hexachloroethane 17 1 18
EndosulfanI 01 1
Methylene chloride 22 2 24
Hexachlorobutadiene 18 l 19
Fluorene 13 1 14
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pvrene 3 • 0 3
Thallium 13 4
Heptachlor 01 1
Mercury - All Others .33 7 40
Endosulfanll 0 1 I
Methyl ethyl ketone 01 1
Endrin 0 I 1
Endosulfan sulfate .0 1 1
Ethyl benzene 19 4 23
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 33 7 . 40
Lead ' 63 10 73
Selenium 10 4 14
Fluoride 26 5 31
Heptachlor epoxide 02 2
Methoxychlor 1 0 1
TotalPCBs(sumofaUPCBisomers,orall Aroclo 3 0 3
Silver 15 5 20
Toluene 20 5 25
2-Chlorophenol 9 1 10
Vanadium ' 2 2 4
2-Chloronaphthalene 01 1
U-Dichloroethylene 18 2 20
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0 1 1
1,2-Dibromoethane/Ethylenedibromide 0 1 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 2 3
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 20 4 24
Vinyl chloride 18 3 21
Zinc 83 18 101
1,2-Dichloroethane 17 3 20
1,1-Dichloroethane 16. 4 20
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 19 1 20
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 17 I 18
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, andp-xyle 156
1,2-Dichloropropane 18 1 19
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 14 5 19
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9 1 10
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: INORGANIC CHEM MANUFACTURI
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
2,4-Dinitrophenol 27 4 31
Trichloromonofluoromethane 1 2 3
Trichloroethylene . . 26 4 30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol . 0 1 1
2-t-Dimethyl phenol 23 4 27
2.4-Dichlorophenol .9 I 10
2.6-Dinitrotoluene 9 I 10
Tribromomethane/Bromoforra 3 2 5
4.6-Dinitro-o-cresol 27 . 4 31
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0 1 1
Arsenic • 10 17 27
p-Dichlorobenzene 2 . 1 3
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 0 1 1
Bendiocarb phenol 50 11 611
gamma-BHC . 0 1 1
p.p'-DDD 0 1 I
p,p'-DDD , 0 1 I
Barium 23 5
alpha-BHC , Oil
o-Cresol 50 11 61
m-Dichlorobenzcne 2 1 3
Anthracene 2 0 2
uans-l,2-Dichloroethylene 6 4 10
delta-BHC 01 1
m-Cresol 50 11 61
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate • 56 11
o-Nitrophenol 50 11 61
p-Chloro-m-cresol . 0 11
Antimony 2 3 5
o-Dichlorobenzene 31 4
Aldrin 0 1 1
p.p'-DDE ' 0 1 1
Benz(a)anthracene 4 6 10
Acenaphthylene 1 I 2
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 0 1 1
p-Nitrophenol 50 11 61
Acenaphthene 112
p.p'-DDT 0 1 1
p-Cresol 50 11 61
Acrylonitrik .10 1
Acetone 0 1 1
beta-BHC 0.1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate . Oil
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: IRON AND STEEL MANUFACTURES
UTS Constituents
Benzo(a)pyrene
Carbon tetrachloride
Dimethyl phthalate
Chloroform
Beryllium
Cadmium
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Benzene
Bromouichlorornethane
Chrysene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chlorobenzene
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Chlorodibromomethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Chlorobenzilate
Cyanides (Amenable)
D ibenz(a, h)anthracene
Chloroethane
Carbofuran phenol
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Dieldrin
Cyanides (Total)
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chromium (Total)
Diethyl phthalate
Hexachloroethane
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Toluene
Endrin aldehyde
Ethyl benzene
Endrin
Lead
Thallium
Fluoranthene
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene
Mercury - All Others
Tetrachloroethylene
Methylene chloride
Pyrene
Selenium
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
22
1
1
7
1
39
0
25
0
1
4
2
3
2
2
0
85
3
2
50
3
1
0
4
0
85
1
93
I
1
12
7
0
3
0
132
2
2
3
12
32.
7
2
3
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
6
2
1
6
2
20
2
6
1
0
4
1
4
2
1
1
10
5
2
11
5
2
1
5
1
10
0
17
1
1
9
5
1
1
I
19
5
2
5
9
3
3
I
5
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
28
3
2
13
3
59
2
31
1
1
8
3
7
4
3
1
95
8
4
61
8
3
I
9
1
95
1
110
2
2
21
12
1
4
1
151
7
4
8
21
35
10
3
8
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ERON AND STEEL MANUFACTURE
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Hexachlorobenzene 123
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 1 . 2 3
Silver 30 11 41
Heptachlor cpoxide 0 1 I
Fluorene 3 0 3
Fluoride 26 11 37
Sulfide 4 2 6
Hexachlorobutadiene 1 1 2
Heptachlor . Oil
1,1-Dichloroethane ' • 1 .2 9
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 0 1 1
Vanadium I 0 I
2.4-Dinitrophenol 50 11 61
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 1 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0 1 I
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trinuoroethane 2 0 2
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p-xyle 3 1
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: LEATHER TANNING & FINISHING
UTS Constituents
o-Nitrophenol
p-Cresol
Cyanides (Total)
Cyanides (Amenable)
Cadmium
Carbofuran phenol
Chromium (Total)
Methylene chloride
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Sulfide
Selenium
Lead
Mercury - All Others
Zinc
2-4-DLmethyl phenol
2.4-Dinitrophenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
0
2
2
0
0
12
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
I
4
1
2
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
1
2
2
1
1'
12
1
4
2
2
3
4
3
1
1
I
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropylene
o-Nitrophenol
m-Cresol
trans-l,3-Dichloropropylene
p-Nitrophenol
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
p-Cresol
Bendiocarb phenol
o-Cresol
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chromium (Total)
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Carbofuran phenol
Cyanides (Amenable)
Cadmium
Cyanides (Total)
Sulfide
Lead
Tetrachloroethylene
Methylene chloride
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinosefa
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: MEAT PRODUCTS
UTS Constituents • No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits ' Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Zinc 44 8
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ' 0 . 1 1
1.2-Dichloroethane , • 0 1 1
1,2-Dichloropropane 0 1 1
Vinyl chloride ' . 0 1 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0 1 1
1.1.1-Trichloroethane 01 1
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0 1 1
2-Chloroeihyl vinyl ether 01 1
1,1-Dichloroethanc 0 1 1
4.6-Dinitro-o-cresol . 01 1
p,p'-DDD 2 0 2
p.p'-DDE \ 30 3
Bendiocarb phenol 41 11 52
p-Chloro-m-cresol 3 0 3
alpha-BHC 2 13
delta-BHC ' 1.1 2
p-Nitrophenol 42 12 54
irans-l,2-Dichloroethylene 38 4 42
o-Nitrophenol 42 12 54
Antimony 10 9 19
gamma-BHC 3 I 4
m-Cresol 41 11 52
Aldrin 21 3
p.p'-DDT 21 3
Acenaphthylcne 2 1 3
Acrolein I 3 4
o-Dichlorobenzene ,7 0 7
beta-BHC 31 4
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 12
Acetone 1 4 5
Arsenic 20 15 35
p-Cresol 42 12 54
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 2 1 3
m-Dichlorobenzene 606
Barium 13 10 23
Acrylonitrile 2 35
o-Cresol 41 12 53
Benz(a)anthracene 3 4 7
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 11 5 16
Acenaphthene • 415
Anthracene 4 15
n-Butyl alcohol Oil
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: METAL FINISHING
UTS Constituents
p-Dichlorobenzene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzo(a)pyrene ~
Cyanides (Amenable)
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Butyl benzyl phthalate-
Di-a-octyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Bromodichloromethane
Dimethyl phthalate
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Chlorobenzene
Beryllium
Cadmium
Carbaryl
Dieldrin
Chlorodibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene .
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Chloroethane
Benzene
Chrysene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h.i)perylene
Chromium (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
Heptachlor
Endrin
Tetrachloroethylene
Lead
Endosulfan n
Pyridine
Hexachloroethane
Endosulfan sulfate
Silver
Isobutyl alcohol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
4
3
4
266
1
1
31
11
266
3
5
5
1
5
9
3
2
6
5
243
0
2
4
3
1
2
1
5
36
3
3
2
346
41
2
2
53
295
1
1
2
1
209
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
1
5
27
1
4
12
0
27
3
1
1
1
1
4.
1
1
4
6
30
1
2
1
2
0
2
2
4
7
0
2
2
24
11
1
1
9
41
0
0
2
0
20
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
4
4
9
293
2
5
43
11
293
6
6
6
2
6
13
4
3
10
11
273
i
4
5
5
1
4
3
9
43
3
5
4
370
52
3
3
62
336
1
1
4
1
229
,1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: METAL FINISHING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits. No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit . UTS Chemical
Limits
' Ethyl benzene 24 6 30
Fluoride 59 10 . . 69
Thallium 448
Diphenylnitrosamine 2 2 4
Methanol Oil
Sulfide 4 1 5
Ethyl acetate 0 1 1
EndosulfanI "1 0 1
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 13 7 20
HexachJorobutadiene 3 1 4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 11 2
Methylene chloride 44 13 57
Mercury - All Others 32 19 51
Fluorene , 31 4
Endrin aldehyde 1 01
Methyl ethyl ketone 5 2 7
Fluoranthene 3 2 5
Hexachlorobenzene 3 1 4
Pyrene 3 25
Toluene 40 ' 19 59
Silvex/2,4.5-TP 2 0 2
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene 2 3 5
Methoxychlor 1 1 2
Selenium 14 12 26
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 32 19 51
Heptachlor epoxide - . 2 0 2
Methyl isobutyl ketone 1 2 3
2,4-Dichlorophenol 4 1 5
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol 4 2 6
2-Chloronaphthalene 1 1 2
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 41 11 52
2.4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4-D 1 1 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 22 . 2 ,24
Trichloroethylene 99 20 119
2,4-Dinitiotoluene 3 1 4
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p-xyle 28 8 3^>
1,1-Dichloroethane 31 4 35
1,2-Dichloropropane 527
1,1-Dichloroethylene 41 2 43
Toxaphene . 2 13
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene 4 1 5
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 1 0 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol . 10 1
1.2-Diphenylhydrazine 112
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: METAL FINISHING
UTS Constituents
2-Chlorophenol
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2-4-Dunethyl phenol
1, l,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,4-Dioxane
Vanadium
Tribromomethane/Bromofonn
2,4-Diniirophenol
Vinyl chloride
1.1.1 -Trichloroethane
2-Chldroethyl vinyl ether
2,6-Diniuotoluene
Zinc
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
2,6-Oichlorophenol
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloromonofluoromethane
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4.6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Antimony
alpha-BHC
Acrolein
Bendiocarb phenol
beta-BHC
Barium
o-Cresol
gamma-BHC
o-Nitrophenol
m-Cresol
p.p'-DDT
Arsenic
p-Nitrophenol
Acrylonitrile
p-Cresol
Cadmium
Chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Beryllium
Benzene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Cyanides (Total)
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroform
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
3
0
42
7
1
2
5
43
32
63
1
4
379
7
2
18
4
1
42
1
0
2
24
0
0
24
0
24
24
0
3
24
1
24
14
2
1
1
2
0
20
1
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
2
1
12
2
0
0
2
13
3
18
2
I
64
0
0
1
2
1
14
1
1
0
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
2
0
2
5
0
0
1
0
1
3
0
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
5
1
54
9
1
2
7
56
35
81
. 3
5
443
7
2
19
6
2
56
2
I
2
26
1
1
26
1
26
26
1
6
26
1
26
19
2
1
2
2
1
23
I
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: METAL MOLDING & CASTING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Dieldrin 0 11
Bromomethane/Methyi bromide 1 0 1
Chlordanc (alpha and gamma isomers) 0 1 -I
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride . 1 0 1
Carbofiiran phenol 24 2 26
Cyanides (Amenable) 20 3 23
Chlorobenzene 1 O.I
Chromium (Total) . 22 . ' 3 ' 25
Selenium 2 2 4
Endrin 01 1
Thallium 1 1 2
Ethyl benzene 2 0 2
Mercury • Nonwastewater from Retort 3 . 4 7
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 5 4 9
Fluoride .6 1 7
Pyrene . Oil
Methyl isobutyl ketone 0 1 1
Mercury - All Others' 3 4 7
Toluene 21 3
Hexachlorobenzene 0 11
Silver 10 . 0 10
Tetrachloroethylene 2 02
Fluoranthene 0 1 1
Methylene chloride 1 1 2
Heptachlor ~ 0 1 .1
Lead 42 7 49
Toxaphene 0 I 1
Zinc 61 7 68
1,2-Dichloropropane 1 0. 1
1,1-Dichloroethane 2 1 3
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2 0 2
2,4-Dinitrophenol 24 .2 26
Tribromomethane/Bromoform 1 0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 2 4
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 12
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0 1 1
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 0 1
Vinyl chloride 101
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-. m-, and p-xyle 1 0 I
1.1-Dichloroethylene 22 4
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 24 2 26
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 0 1 *~ 1
Trichloroethylene 1 3 4
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 24 2 26
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: METAL MOLDING & CASTING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 1 • 0 1
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 24 2 26
o-Cresol 2 I 3
o-Nitrophenol 2 1 3
Barium . 224
Antimony 0.1 l
Arsenic 4 3 7
p-Nitrophenol • 2.1 3
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 0 11
Bendiocarb phenol 2 1 3
p-Cresol 213
m-Cresol 213
Carbofuran phenol 2 1 3
Beryllium 1 . 0 1
Cadmium '448
Cyanides (Total) ' 224
Chromium (Total) . 549
Benzene H 0 H
Cyanides (Amenable) 2 2 4
Fluoride 19 4 23
Selenium 2 2 4
Sulfide 2 6 8
Toluene 6 0 6
Mercury - Nomvastewater from Retort .9 5 14
Mercury - All Others 95 14
Ethyl benzene 3 0 3
Silver 1 3-4
Lead 7 3 10
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 2 1 3
Zinc 19 7 . 26
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2 1 3
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 2 1 3
Xylenes-mixedisomers(sumofo-, m-, andp-xyle 6 0 f>
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 2 1 3
Antimony .0 -I 1
Benzene Oil
Cyanides (Total) 2 0 2
Chromium (Total) 2 0 2
Cadmium • • 2 2 4
Cyanides (Amenable) 2 02
Silver ,1 • 0 1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NONFER METAL FORMING & POWD
UTS Constituents
Ethyl benzene
Fluoride
Toluene
Lead
Mercury - All Others
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
Zinc
Arsenic
p-Nitrophenol
p-Cresol
o-Nitrophenol
o-Cresol
Barium
Antimony
Bendiocarb phenol
m-Cresol
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Anthracene
Acenaphthene
Benz(a)anthracene
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene.
Benzene
Chrysene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
' Cadmium
Bromodichloromethane
Chromium (Total)
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
Cyanides (Amenable)
Carbofuran phenol
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Bcnzo(b)fluoranthene
Beryllium
Benzo(a)pyrene
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexachlorobenzene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
4
0
3
1
1
0
3
21
3
3
3
3
4
19
3
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
I
2
1
1
25
1
25
0
2
1
30
3
30
1
2
3
15
6
0
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
I
0
1
0
• 0
0
1
I
3
0
0
. 0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
1
2
1
1
0
6
0
6
0
0
1
3
2
1
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
4
1
3
1
1
/
4
24
3
3
3
3
4
23
3
3
I
1
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
1 28
2
27
1
3
1
36
3
36
1
2
4
18
8
1
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: NONFERROUS METALS MANUFACT
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Pyrene 101
Sulfide • 2 0 2
Methyl isobutyl ketone 1 0 1
Selenium 527
Toluene . 3 • 2 5
Fluoranthene . 2 1 3
Fluorene 2 0 2
Tetrachloroethylene 1 1 2
Methylene chloride 2 13
Fluoride 30 2 . 32
Thallium 1 0 1
Lead .37 6 43
Ethyl benzene 1 0 1
Silver 7 2 9
Mercury - All Others 82 10
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 82 10
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene -1 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, andp-xyle 2 1 3
Trichloroethylene 3 1,4
Zinc 52 7 59
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 1 2
1,1-Dichloroethylene 2 1 3
2,4-Dinitrophenol 3 0 3 '
1.1,1-Trichloroethane 3 1 4
1,1-Dichloroethane 2 0 2
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 30 3
Vanadium • 1 1 2
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 3 1 4
Vinyl chloride 11 2
1,2-Dibromoethane/Ethylene dibromide 2 0 2
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 3 03
o-Nitrophenol 5 2 7
Bendiocarb phenol • .' 5 . 2 7
Acenaphthene 1 0 1
p-Nitrophenol 5 2 7
o-Cresol 52 7
m-Cresol 527
Anthracene 1 .0 1
Arsenic 1 12
p-Cresol 52 7
Benzene 7 18
Cartxjfuran phenol 5 2 7
Cadmium • 101
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: OIL & GAS EXTRACTION
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Chromium (Total) 4 0 4
Cyanides (Total) I 0 I
Cyanides (Amenable) I 0 1
Mercury - All Others . 1 0 1
Fluoride 022
Fluoranthene 1 0 1
Tetrachloroethylene I 0 1
Ethyl benzene 325
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 1 01
Lead 5 3 8
Toluene 32 5
Sulfide 4 1 5
1.1,1-Trichloroethane 10 1
1.2-Dibromoethane/Ethylene dibromide 1 12
2-4-Dimethyl phenol .5 2 7
2,4-Dirutrophenol 5 27
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 5 27
Zinc .5 1 6
Trichloroethylene 1 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle 3 1 4
Vinyl chloride I 0 1
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 5 27
o-Cresol - 3 0 3
p-Cresol 3 1 4 '
p-Nitrophenol 303
Bendiocarb phenol 30 3
Antimony . ' • 2 1 3
Acenapbthene 1 0 1
Anthracene 10 1
Benz(a)anthracene 0 1 1
Barium 2 2 4
m-Cresol 3 0 3
o-Nitrophenol 3 0 3
Acetone 0 1 1
Arsenic 181 113 294
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 1 2
Cadmium 103 10 113
Chromium (Total) 20 8 28
Benzene I 12
Cyanides (Total) 22 11 33
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0 1 1
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene 0 1 1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0 1 1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORE MINING & DRESSING
UTS Constituents
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Cyanides (Amenable)
BenzoOOfluoranthene
Carbofuran phenol
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
Lead
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl ether
Fluoranthene
Fluoride
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene
Toluene
Silver
Thallium
Methyl ethyl ketone
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Selenium
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Mercury - All Others
Sulfide
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Zinc
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
Vanadium
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
o-Nitrophenol
alpha-BHC
Arsenic
beta-BHC
p.p'-DDE
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Barium
Aniline
Acrylonitrile
o-Cresol
Aldrin
p-Chloro-m-cresol
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Acrolein
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
22
0
3
0
I
109
0
0
1
3
0
0
24
2
0
100
19
0
100
5
3
3
139
3
5
1
3
219
2
25
2
2
155
154
8
1
177
89
2
2
170
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
11
1
0
1
3
7
1
1
0
7
1
1
9
I
1
8
6
1
8
0
0
0
10
0
.3
0
0
14
1
10
0
0
12
13
4
7
11
21
0
2
12.
2
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
I
33
1
3
I
4
116
1
1
1
10
1
1
33
3
1
108
.25
1
108
5
3
3
149
3
8
1
3
233
3
35
2
2
167
167
12
8
188
110
2
4
182
3
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORG CHEMS, PLASTICS & SYN FTBR
UTS Constituents No, of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 202
Acetonitrile 0 . 2 2
o-Dichlorobenzene 182 9 191
p-Cresol 90 21 . Ill
p-Nitrophenol . 219 13 232
Acenaphthylene 140 13 153
Bendiocarb phenol 89 21 110
Acetone -145
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 3 I 4
p-Dichlorobenzene 179 10 189
gamma-BHC . 213
Antimony : 14 8 22
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 181 11 192
P.R'-DDD 2 o 2
delta-BHC 20 2
p,p'-DDT 3 0 3
Benz(a)anthracene 155 11 166
p,p'-DDD 2 0 2
m-Cresol 89 21 110
m-Dichlorobenzene 177 10 187
cis-l,3-Dichloropropylene 3 1 4
Diphenylnitrosamine 2 0 2
Diethyl phthalate 157 11 168
Benzene 204 10 214
hromium (Total) ~ 156 12 168
Chlorobenzene 186 10 196
Chrysene 155 13 168
Carbon tetrachloride 177 11 188
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 7 5 12
Cyanides (Total) 108 19 127
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 156 11 167
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 0 1
Di-n-propylnitrosamine 1 1,2
Carbon disulfide 10 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate 21 3
Dibcnz(a,e)pyrene 538
Caroaryl 10 1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 8 4 12
Di-n-octyl phthalate 72 9
Carbofuran 2 02
Chloroethane 178 11 189
Dieldrin 3 0 3
Di-n-butyl phthalate 162 9 171
Chlororaethane/Methyl chloride 177 13 190
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORG CHEMS, PLASTICS & SYN FIBR
UTS Constituents
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Carbofuran phenol
(Cadmium
Bro mo methane/Methyl bromide
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Chloroform
Bromodichloromethane
Benzo(a)pyrene
Beryllium
Chlorodibromomethane
Cyanides (Amenable)
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Methylene chlohde
Toluene
Dithiocaibamates (total)
Mercury - All Others
Tetrachloroethylene
Fluoranthene
Silver
Silvex/2,4,5-TP
Toxaphene
Hexachloroethane
Thallium
Methyl ethyl ketone
-Lead
Fluoride
Ethyl benzene
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Hexachlorobenzene
HxCDDs (All Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins)
Pyridine
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan sulfate
Hexachlorobutadieoe
Pyrene
. Sulfide
Endosulfan D
Heptachlor epoxide
Methyl methacrylate
Ruorene
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
, Selenium
No. of Permits '
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
154
89
20
5
1
194
8
156
7
9
108
7
. 1
2
193
202
1
36
191
154
19
2
2
176
4
0
112
16
190
5
179
. 0
0
2
2
178
157
9
2
2
0
157
36
14
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
11
21
10
2
0
14
2
11
3
1
19
5
2
0
' 17
16
0
17
13
12
5
0
0
10
2
3
24
3
14
1.
10
I
1
0
0
9
13
0
0
0
1
13
17
5
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
165
110
30
7
1
208
10
167
10
10
127
12
3
2
210
218
1
53
204
166
24
2
2
186
6
3
136
19
204
6
189
1
I
2
2
187
170
9
2
2
1
170
53
19
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: ORG CHEMS, PLASTICS & SYN FIBR
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits '
Endrin 2 0 2
Heptachlor 1 0 1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 151 9 160
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine . 1 1 2
2-sec-ButyI-4,6-
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PAINT FORMULATING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Arsenic 1 0 1
Cadmium 1 0 1
Bromodichloromethane ~ 0 1 1
Chromium (Total) 3 0 3
Benzene 1 0 ' 1
Toluene 31 4
Methylene chloride 202
Mercury - All Others ' . 1 01
Methyl ethyl ketone 1 1 2
Tetrachloroethylene 2 0 2
Ethyl benzene 2 02
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 1 0 1
Silver . 1 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle 1 0 /
1,1-Dichloroethane 1 0 1
Zinc 4 1 5
1,1.1-Trichloroethane 101
1.2-Dichloroethane 10 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1 0 1
Anthracene 0 1 1
Barium • Oil
trans-1.2-Dichloroethylene 0 1 1
Arsenic 1 23
p-Cresol 0 3 3
p-Nitrophenol 0 3 3
Acenaphthylene 0 1 . 1
Benz(a)anthracene 0 1 1
m-Cresol , 033
o-Cresol 0 3 3
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 0 1 1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 0 1 1
Acrylonitrile 0 11
o-Nitrophenol. 033
m-Dichlorobenzene* 0 1 1
Acrolein 0 1 1
p-Dichlorobenzene 01 1
Bendiocarb phenol 0 3 3
o-Dichlorobenzene • I 0 1
Acenaphthene 0 11
Antimony 0 1 1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 01 1
p-Chloro-m-cresol 0 1 1
Benzo(a)pyrene 0 1 1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PAVING & ROOFING MATERIALS
UTS Constituents
Beryllium
Di -n-propy Initrosamine
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloroethane
Dibenz(a,h)amhracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Chloroform
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Carbofuran phenol
Cyanides (Total)
Chrysene
Benzene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene*
Chlorobenzene
Dimethyl phthalate
Chromium (Total)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
BromodichJoromethane
Cadmium
Chlorodibromomethane
Cyanides (Amenable)
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene
Fluoranthene
Hexachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Fluorene
Mercury - All Others
Hexachlorobenzene
Diphenylnitrosamine
Pyrene
Toluene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Lead
Selenium
Methylene chloride
Thallium
Mercury - Nonwastewater firom Retort
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
6
0
0
0
1
0 '
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
1
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
I
0
1
2 •
1
1
1
1
TotaJ No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
6
1
.1
1
3
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
2
1
1
1
4
1
7 .
2
1
I
I
L
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PAVING & ROOFING MATERIALS
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Silver 0.22
Ethyl benzene 2 1 3
Trichloromonofluoromethane 0 1 1
2.6-Dinitrotolucne 0 1
2-Chloro naphthalene 0 I
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 0 3
1,1-Dichloroethane 0 1
Tribromomethane/Bromoform 0 I
U-Dichloroethylene 0 1
1,1.1-Trichloroethane 0 1
2-Chlorophenol 0 1
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, rh-, and p- xyle 2 1 3
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 01 1
1,2-Dichloropropane 0 11
2,4-Dinitrophenol 0 3 3
2,4-Dichlorophenol 0 1 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0,1 1
Trichloroethylene 01 1
Vinyl chloride 0 1 1
1,2-Dichloroethane 0 1 1
2^-Dimethyl phenol 0 3 3
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0 1 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0 1 1
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 0 1 1
l,i,2-Trichloroethane 0 1 1
Zinc 4 3 7
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol • 0 3 3
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0 1 1
Bendiocarb phenol 3 25
Arsenic 415
p,p'-DDT 1 ,0 1
p-Nitrophenol 8 1 9
Benz(a)anthracene 5 0 5
o-Dichlorobenzene 7 07
o-Nitrophenol . 8 1 9
p-Chloro-m-cresol 1 . 0 I
Acrylonitrile 6.0 6
o-Cresol 325
m-Dichlorobenzene 707
Antimony 0 11
Acenaphthylene 50 5
p-Dichlorobenzene 1 0 7
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PESTICIDE CHEMICALS
UTS Constituents
Acenaphthene
m-Cresol
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
p.p'-DDD
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Anthracene
p-Cresol
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
ChJorodibromomethane
Carbaryl
Chromium (Total)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Carbofuran phenol
Cyanides (Amenable)
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(a)pyrene
Cyclohexanone
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chloroe thane
Bromodichloromethane
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Dimethyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
D ie thy 1 phthalate
Cadmium
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzene
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chloroform
Hexachloroetnane
Silver
Fluoride
Hcxachlorobutadiene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Fluorene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
Lead
Methomyl
No. pf Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
5
3
1
1
7
5
3
4
1
1
8
5
' 3
7
7
5
0
5
5
7
1
0
5
7
5
1
7
5
7
1
7
7 '
7
0
2
7
5
5
7
5
8
7
4
1
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
3
0
2
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
o ,
0
1
. 0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
1
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
5
5
1
1
7
5
5
6
1
1
11
5
5
9
9
5
I
5
5
7
1
1
5
7 '
5
2
7
5
7
2
7
8
7
1
2
7
5
5
7
5
9
g
5
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PESTICIDE CHEMICALS
UTS Constituents - No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Ethyl benzene 7 0 7
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 0 2 2
Tetrachloroethylcne .. 7 0 7
Methoxychlor ' 0 1 1
Endosulfan sulfate 0 1 1
Mercury - All Others 0 2 2
Sulfide 0 1 1
1,2-Dichloroethane 8 1 9
1,1-Dichloroethane 7 0 7
2.4-Dichlorophenol 6 1 7
Trichloroethylerie 707
2,6-Dichlorophenol 1 0 1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1 01
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7 0 7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene , 5 0 5
2,6-Dinitrotoluene .5 0 5
1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 0 7
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 1 01
Zinc • - 11 1 12
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, andp-xyle - 1 1 2.
2-Chlorophenol 6 1 7
1.2-Dichloropropane 707
Vinyl chloride 7 07
2,4-Dichlorophcnoxyacetic acid/2,4-D 2 02
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 0 1
Tribromomethane/Bromoform 10 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 707
1.1,1-Trichloroethane 7 0 7
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 5 2 1
1.4-Dioxane 1 01
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 4 2 6
2.4-Dinitrophenol 8 I 9
Toxaphene 0 1 1
4.6-Dinitro-o-cresol 8 I 9
p-Nitrophenol 134 11 145
p,p'-DDT' 7 3 10
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.3 3
p,p'-DDD 5 3 8
p-Cresol 134 11 145
beta-BHC . . 53 8
p-Dichlorobenzene 12 3 15
Acenaphthene 9 8 17
Bendiocarb phenol 134 11 145
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PETROLEUM REFINING
UTS Constituents
Antimony
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropylene
alpha-BHC
m-Dichlorobenzene
m-Cresol
Barium
o-Nitrophenol
p.p'-DDE
Aldrin
Acrylonitrile
p.p'-DDD
delta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
Arsenic
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
gamma-BHC
o-Cresol
p-ChJoro-m-cresol
Acrolein
o-Dichlorobenzene
Benz(a)anthracene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Carbaryl
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Cadmium
Benzene
Dieldrin
Carbofuran phenol
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dietnyl phthalate
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Benzo(a)pyrene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
O ibenz(a,e)pyrene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dimethyl phthalate
Bromodichloromethane
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chromium (Total)
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
4
0
5
9
134
5
134
- 5
8
7
5
0
3
5
18
5
9
3,
5
134
6
3
9
16
7 .
0
0
16
55
8
134
12
7
12
0
16
' 7
11
. 0
7
0
4
128
0
No., of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
3
3
1
3
11
1
11
3
3
. 3
3
8
7
8
11
4
4
7
1
11
6
3
3
4
9
1
8
11
18
3
11
4
8
4
8
4
8
3
1
8
4
4
9
4
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
7
3
6
12
145
6
145
S
11
10
' 8
8
10
13
29
9
13
10
6
145
12
6
12
20
16
1
8
27
73.
11
145
16
15
16
8
20
15
14
1
15
4
8
137
4
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PETROLEUM REFINING
UTS Constituents
Chloroe thane
Beryllium
Carbon tetrachloride
Diphenylnitrosamine
Chrysene . .
Chlorcxlibromomethane
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chlorobenzene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Chloroform
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Ethyl benzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Endhn aldehyde
Fluoranthene
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Endhn
Mercury - All Others
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor epoxide
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Toluene
Heptachlor
Selenium
Hexachlorobutadiene
Endosulfan II
Pyrene
Hexachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Silver
Fluoride
Sulfide
Indeno (l,2.3-c,d) pyrene
Thallium
Lead
Hexachlorobenzene
Fluorene
Methylene chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
4
4
10
3
5
0
8
16
10
29
0
13
29
16
28
3
1
17
21
7
21
0
5
8
45
8
17
7
0
6
7
11
14
8
138
12
4
39
12
6
13
I
4
9
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
8
2
7
3
4
4
3
4
7
7
7
6
7
4
17
3
1
3
5'
1
5
. 3
3
3
17
3
10
8
2
4
8
5
7
3
2
4
4
17
4
5
7
0
8
7
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
12
6
17
6
9
4
11
20
17
36
7
19
36
20
45
6
2
20
26
8
26
3
8
11
62
11
27
15
2
10
15
16
21
11
140
16
8
56
16
11
20
I
12
16
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PETROLEUM REFINING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
2.4.5-Trichloropheaol ,5 1 6
2-4-Dimelhyl phenol 134 11 145
2-Chlorophenol 9 7 16
1.2-Diphenylhydrazine 336
1.1-Dichloroeihylene . • 10 7 17
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ' . 4 8 12
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-diaitrophenol/Dinoseb .134 11 145
1.1-Dichloroethane 9 8 17
2,4-Dirutrophenol 135 10 145
Toxaphene 8 3 11
Tribromomethane/Bromoform 1 4 5
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-. m-. and p^ xyle 28 1 2f
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 88 16
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 08 8
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 78 15
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 5 1 6
Vanadium 0 4 4
Vinyl chloride 10 6 16
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 13 8 21
2,6-Dichlorophenol 51 6
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3 8 11
1,2-Dichloroethane 14 • 1 21
Trichloroethylene 13 6 19
Zinc 38 13 51
1.2-Dichloropropane .5 8 13
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol 9 4 13
Trichloromonofluoromethane 0 5 5
2-Chloronaphthalene 0 8 8
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 08 8
4,6-Dirutro-o-cresol 134 11 145
alpha-BHC 2 24
o-Dichlorobeozene 3 36
m-Cresol 20 8 28
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 2 2 4
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 2 1 3
m-Dichlorobenzcne 224
cis-1.3-Dichloropropylene 1 2 3
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 6 3 9
Benz(a)anthracene 22 4
beta-BHC 22 4
o-Cresol 20 8 28
Barium . 3 3 6
o-Nitroaniline 1 0 1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURI
UTS Constituents
Bendiocarb phenol
gamma-BHC
dclta-BHC
Anthracene
p,p'-DDT
p-Nitrophenol
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Antimony
Arsenic
Acenaphthylene
Acrolein .
Aniline
o-Nitrophenol
Acetone
Aldrin
Acenaphthene
p-Cresol
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
p,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDD
p-Dichlorobenzene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
Acrylonithle
Chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Dieldrin
Chlorodibromomethane
Cadmium
Diethyl phthalate
Chlorobenzene
Dimethyl phthalate
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Bromodichloromethane
Benzene
Benzo(a)pyreoe
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Caroofuran phenol
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Beryllium
Chromium (Total)
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
20
2
2
2
2
21
2
2
8
2
2
0
21
0 ,
2
3
20
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
1
10
3
2
3
2
4
5
2
2
20
2
20
2
2
3
2
15
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
8
1
1
2
2
8
2
2
5
2
2
1
8
. 2
1
1
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
5
2
3
2
1
3
4
2
2
4
2
8
2
2
2
2
6
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
28
3
3
4
4
29
4
4
13
4
4
1
29
2 '
3
4
28
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
5
3
4
15
5
5
5
3
7
9
4
4
24
4
28
4
4
5
4
21
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURI
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2 2 4
Di-n-octyl phthalate 4.2 6
Carbondisulfide 0 1.1
Chlororaethane/Methyl chloride 2 3 5
Di-n-propylnitrosamine 2 3 5
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide 2 3 5
Chloroform 12 4 16
Cyanides (Amenable) 20 4 24
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene . 2 2 4
Ethylene oxide 1 0 1
Endosulfan I 2 1 '3
Heptachlor epoxide 21 3
Endosulfan sulfate 2 2 4
Heptachlor 213
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 0 ' 2 ' 2
Pyrene . 2 2 4
Diphenylnitrosamine 2 2 4
Fluoranthene 3 2 5
Ethyl acetate 0 1 1
Tetrachloroethylene 224
Fluoride , 6 1 7
Fluorene 3 25
Ethyl benzene ' 3 3 6
Selenium . 6 2 8
Toluene ~ 6 3 9
Endrin 2 13
Silver 7 3 10
Sulfide 4 2 6
Thallium 22 4
Endosulfan H 2-1.3
Methomyl 0 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2 4
Methanol 01 1
Hexachlorobutadiene 2 2 4
Mercury - All Others 18 3 21
Methylene chloride 7 8 15
Methyl isobutyl ketone 01 1
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pvrene 2 2 4
Lead 13 7 20
Hexachloroethane . . 2 24
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 18 3 .21
Hexachlorobenzene . 2 24
1,1-Dichloroethane 22 4
Toxaphene 21 3
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURI
UTS Constituents
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Zinc
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane
1.2-DichJoroe thane
Trichloroethylene
2,4-Dimtrophenol
Vinyl chloride
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2-4-Dimethyi phenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Thchloromonofluoromethane
2-Chloronaphthalene .
2-Chlorophenol
1,2-DichJoropropane
2,4-Diniuotoluene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Tnbromometnane/Bromoform
1.1,1 -Trichlorocthane
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Arsenic
Bendiocarb phenol
p-Nitrophenol
m-Cresol
o-Cresol
o-Nitrophenol
Antimony
Acetone
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
p-Cresol
Bromodichloromethane
Chromium (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
Chlorodibromomethane
Cadmium
Chloroethane
Cyanides (Total)
Cyanides (Amenable)
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
2
28
2
3
2
2
2
2
21
2
2
2
21
20
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
21
2
6
6
6
6
6
I
2
1
6
1
. 2
6
1
1
1
6
6
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
2
17
2
2
3
2
4
3
8
3
2
2
8
8
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
8
0
1
I
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0 .
4
1
0
2
0
1
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS ChemicaJ
' 4
45
4
5
5
4
6
5
29
5
4
4
29
28
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
4
29
2
7
7
7
7
7
1
. 2
1
7
1
6
7
I
3
1
7 .
7
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Fluoride . 3 1 4
Methylcne chloride 3 0 3
Tetrachlorocthylene 303
Silver 10 0 10 ,
Sulfide 1 0 1
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 2 1 . 3
Mercury - All Others 2-1 3
Lead •* 2 ,6
Toluene 3-0 3
Vanadium .1 0 I
Trichloroethylene 3 0 3
Zinc ' 5; 3 8
1.1-Dichloroethane 2 0 2
2-4-Dimethyl phenol " 6 1 7
1,2-Dichloroethane 3 03
1.1,1-Trichloroethane 2 0 2
1.1-Dichloroethylene 20 2
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitr6phenol/Dinoseb 6 1 7
Vinyl chloride I 0 1
Trichloromonofluoromethane 1 0 1
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-. m-, andp-xyle 1 0 /
2,4-Dinitrophenol 6 1 7
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 6 17
trans-l,3-Dichloropropylene 0 1 1
beta-BHC 0 1 1
p-Dichlorobenzene 0 2 2
Bendiocarb phenol 8 3 11
p.p'-DDD 0 11
Acenaphthene 1 2 .3
m-Cresol 8 3 11
p-Nitrophenol 8 '3 11
Antimony 1 1 2
Acetone . 1 1 2
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 0 2 2
p-Cresol 8 3 11
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 0 1 1
alpha-BHC 0 1 1
tians-l,2-Dichloroethylene 123
cis-l,3-Dichloropropylene 0 1 .1
Anthracene 02 2
Acrylohitrile 0 2 2
delta-BHC 0 I 1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 4 4 8
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PLASTICS MOLDING & FORMING
UTS Constituents
p.p'-DDT
o-Dichlorobenzene
o-Nitrophenol —
Arsenic
Aldrin
Benz(a)anthracene
gamma-BHC
Barium
m-Dichlorobenzene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
o-Cresol
Acenaphthylene
Acrolein
p.p'-DDE
Benzene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Chlorodibromomethane
Benzo(g,h,i)peiylene '
Chiysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Bromomethane/Methyl bromide
Bromodichloromethane
Diethyl phthalate
Carbon tetrachlohde
Chromium (Total)
Dichlorodifluororaethane
Beryllium
Chloroethane
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Dieldrin
Chloroform
Chlorobenzene
Cyanides (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Cadmium
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzo(a)pyrene
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Cyanides (Amenable)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
0
0
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
8
0
0
4
1
0
1
2
0
I
2
3
6
2
2
1
2
2
1
3
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
-2
2
2
3
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
2
4
3
3
4
6
4
2
1
4
2
1
2
11
9
2
2
1
2
2
1
11
2
2
1
4
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
10
1
3
2
1
2
1
5
2
6
11
3
4
10
5
2
2
6
2
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PLASTICS MOLDING & FORMING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits .No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Methyl ethyl ketone 1 0 1
Hexachlorobutadiene 0 2 2
Selenium 156
Indeno (1.2,3-c,d) pyrene 02 2
EndosulfanI 0 I 1
Hexachloroethane 0 2 2
Ethylene oxide 1 0 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0 . 1 1
Lead ' . 77 14
Endosulfanll 0 1 1
Silver 2 4 6
Fluorene 12 3
Fluoranthene 0 2 2
Toluene 53 8
Mercury - All Others 2.6 8
Sulfide 1 0 1
Endosulfan sulfate 0 1 1
Diphenyliutrosamine 0 2 2
HcptachJor epoxide 0 1 1
Pyrene * 0 2 2
Thallium 0 11
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 0 1 1
Hexachlorobenzene . .0 2 2
Fluoride 1 1 2
Endrin 0 1 1
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 2 6 8
Methylene chloride 1 4 5
Ethyl benzene • 1 3 4
Tetrachloroethylene '1 2 3
Heptachlor 0 11
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p-xyle 2 1 3
Zinc 16 11 27
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 8 3 11
2,4-Dinitro toluene 0 2 2
2-4-Dimethyl phenol • 8 3 11
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0 22
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0 2 2
Trichloroethylene 6 2 8
1,1-Dichloroethylene 3 2 5
Trichloromonofluoromethane 0 11
Toxaphene Oil
1.1.2-Trichloro-1.2,2-trifluoroethane .1 0 1
Tribromomethane/Bromoform 0 1 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 022
11/21/95
-------
Summary of tJTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PLASTICS MOLDING & FORMING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
1,1.1-Trichloroethane 4 37
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8 3 11
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0 1 1
2-Chlorophenol 0 1 .1
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 2 3
2,4-DichIorophenol 0 1 I
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0 2 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 0 2 2
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 0 2 2
U-Dichloroethane 2 2 4
2-Chloronaphthalene 0 2 2
Vinyl chloride 1 23
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether . 0 2 2
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 8 3 11
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 2 3
1 0 1
Cyanides (Total) 1 0 1
Chromium (Total) 2 0 2
Cyanides (Amenable) 1 0 1
Lead 202
Silver 1 0 1
Zinc 213
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 2 0 2
Bendiocarb phenol 25 20 45
m-Dichlorobenzene 1 0 1
p-Nttrophenol 26 20 46
Antimony 21 3
p,p'-DDT 0 3 3
gamma-BHC 0 3 .. 3
Acenaphthylene 1 0 1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 4 4 8
p-Chloro-m-cresot 4 26
Acenaphthene ° '1 0 1
• 2 0 2
Anthracene 1 0 1
m-Cresol 25 20 45
p-Cresol 25 20 45
o-Cresol 25 20 45
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1.0 1
o-Nitrophenol 26 20 46
o-Dichlorobenzene 101
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PULP, PAPER. & PAPERBOARD
UTS Constituents
alpha-BHC
Arsenic
Acrolein
Barium
Acetone
Acrylonitrile
p-Oichlorobenzene
beta-BHC
Chromium (Total)
Cyanides (Amenable)
Carbofuran phenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Beryllium
Cadmium
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Chloroethane
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Dimethyl phthalate
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Chloroform
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers)
Cyanides (Total)
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzene
Diethyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chlorobenzene
Dieldrin
Carbon tetrachloride
Chrysene
Pyrene
Hexachlorobenzeoe
Sulfide
Lead
Endosulfan I
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Fluorene
Thallium
Toluene
Hexachloroethane
Diphenylnitrosamine
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
7
0
0
1
1
1
0
10
16
25
2
2
0
12
4
1
1
2
2
1
1
12
0
16
1
3
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
17
0
. 7
1
3
9
1
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
3
5
3
1
1
0
0
4
12
11
20
0
0
3
16
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
8
3
11
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
5
3
25
1
21
0
3
4
1
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
3
12
3
I
2
1
1
4
22
27
45
2
2
3
28
4
2
1
2
2
2
1
20
3
27
1
5
2
2
1
3
' 1
1
1
6
6
42
1
28
1
6
13
2
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: PULP, PAPER, & PAPERBOARD
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Indeno (1.2,3-c,d) pyrene > 10 I
Hexachlorobutadiene 1 0 1
Heptachlor 0 3 3
/Tetrachloroethylene 224
Ethyl benzene . 3 I -4
Total PCBs (sum of all PCBisomers. or all Aroclo 5 12 17
Mercury - All Others 7 21 28
Selenium 2 9 11
Silver 7 7 14
Methylene chloride 4 15
Endrin 0,3 3
Methyl ethyl ketone 1 01
Fluoranthene 1 3 4
Vinyl chloride 1 0 1
Xylenes-mixedisomers(sumofo-, m-, andp-xyle 3 4 7
Trichloroethylene .3 2 5
Toxaphene 0 33
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 26 20 46
2,4-Dichlorophenol - 4 1 5
1,2,4-Trichlorooenzene 1 0 1
1,2-Dichloropropane 2 02
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 0 1
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 033
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 25 20 45
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 51 6
2,4-Dinitrophenol 26 20 46
2,3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol 3 1 4
2,4-Dinitrotoluene . 1 . . 0 1
1,1-Dichloroethylene 3 03
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 31 4
1,1-Dichloroethane 1 0 1
2,6-Dichlorophenol 3 1 4
2-Chlorophenol .4 1 5
Zinc 47 39 86
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 0 1
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol 4 4 8
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol 27 20 47
Antimony 1 0 1
p-Cresol 6 1 7
Benz(a)anthracene 17 2 19
Acenaphthene 17 2 19
Acenaphthylene 17 2 19
11/21/95 .
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: RAYON AND OHER FIBERS
UTS Constituents
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate ,
Bendiocarb phenol
Acrylonitrile
Acrolein
m-Crcsol
o-Dichlorobenzene
o-Nitrophenol
Barium
Arsenic
trans-1,2-D ichloroethylene
Anthracene
o-Cresol
p-Dichlorobenzene
p-Nitropheno!
m-Dichlorobenzene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chromium (Total)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Cyanides (Amenable)
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Chrysene
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Chloroform
Carbon disulfide
Diethyl phthalate
Carbon tetrachloride
Cadmium
Chloroethane
Benzene
Dimethyl phthalate
Carbofuran phenol
Chlorobenzene
Fluorene
Mercury - Nomvastewater from Reton
Sulfide
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Lead
Fluoranthene
Tetrachloroethylene
Pyrene
Mercury • All Others
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
17
6
17
0
6
17
17
0
I
17
17
6
17
17
17
17-
8
17
11
17
17
11
17
17
17
0
17
17
2
17
18
17
6
17
17
0
2
17
17
8
17
18
17
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
2
1
.2
2
1
2
2
1 ,
2
2
2
I
2
2
2 •
2
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
0
2
2
4
2
3
2
2
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
19
7
19
2
7
19
19
1
3
19
19
7 .
19
19
19
19
13
19
13
19
19
13
19
19
19
1
19
19
4
19
21
19
7 .
19
19
2
2
19
19
12
19
21
19
2
11/21/95
-------
Summmry of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: RAYON AND OHER FIBERS
UTS Constituents
Methylene chloride
Silver
Hexachloroethane
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Selenium
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Trichloroethylene
1,4-Dioxane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloronaphthalene .
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1.1,2-Trichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2-Chlorophenol
1,2-Dichloroethane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Zinc
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
bis(2*Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Antimony
Bendiocarb phenol
p-Cresol
m-Cresol
Arsenic
o-Nitrophenol
o-Cresol
uans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
p-Nitrophenol
Barium
Chromium (Total)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbofuran phenol
Cyanides (Total)
Benzene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
17
0
17
0
0
17
17
17
18
2
17
0
16
17
16
17
17
17
17
17
6
17
16
17
16
11
17
0
0
1
1.
1
2
1
1
5
1
0
12
0
1
1
2
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
2
5
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
3
1
4
1
2
5
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
19
1
19
1
1
19
19
19
20
2
19
2
18
19
18
19
19
19
20
19
7
19
17
19
18 ,
16
19
1
I
3
3
3
4
3
3
5
4
I
16
1
3
6
3
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: RUBBER MANUFACTURING
UTS Constituents
Cyanides (Amenable)
Chloroethane
Beryllium
Chloroform
Cadmium
Selenium
Pyrene
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Ethyl benzene
Mercury - All Others
Fluoride
Silver
Tetrachloroethylene
Thallium
Lead
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Zinc
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
2-sec-Butyl<4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
m-Cresol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
Bendiocarb phenol
Arsenic
o-Nitrophenol
p-Nitrophenol
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Carbofuran phenol
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Silver
Mercury - All Others
Sulfide
Selenium
Lead
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
1
1
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
4
0
8
I
5
7
21
5
3
1
5
3
I
1
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
2
3
4
3
1
3
2
1
4
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
5
1
1
0
5
1
1
0
1
2
1
i 2
0
1
8
2
0
1
12
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 ,
1
0
1
0
0
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
6
2
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
4
I
16
3
5
8
33
6
4
3 ,
•6
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
I ,
4
4
2
3
4
4
1
4
2
I
5
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: SEAFOOD PROCESSING
UTS Constituents
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Zinc
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dtnoseb
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
4,6-Dinilro-ocresol
o-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
gamma-BHC
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
Benz(a)anthracene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropylene
Barium
Bendiocaita phenol
Acetone
p-Oichlorobenzene
m-Dichlorobenzene
p-Nitrophenol
Anthracene
o-Cresol
Arsenic
o-Dichlorobenzene
Acenaphthylene
Acrylonithle
p-Cresol
m-Cresol
Antimony
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Dimethyl phtnalate
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Cyanides (Total)
Benzo(a)pyTene
Carbon tetrachlpride
Carbofuran phenol
Benzene
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Di-n-butyl phtnalate
Diphenylnitrosamine
Benzo(b)fiuoranthene
Chrysene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Chlorobenze
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
4
5
4
4
4
13
7
0
8
8
1
2
7
0
9
8
13
7
7
3
8
6
8
7
7
1
8
8
7
1
4
8
8
7
10
1
7
4
1
8
7
4
9
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
I
1
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
4
8
4
4
4
14
7
1
8
8
1
4
8
I
9
8
14
7
8
5
8
6
8
8
8
1
8
8
7
1
6
8
8
8
10
1
7
8
1
8
7
6
9
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: SOAP & DETERGENT MANUFACTUR
UTS Constituents
2,4-Dinitrophenol
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid/2,4-D
Zinc
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresoI
Acryldnitrile
Acetone
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Benz(a)anthracene
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
Aldrin
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Anthracene
Acenaphthylene
Acrolein
Acenaphthene
p,p'-DDE
Antimony
p-Dichlorobenzene
p,p'-DDD
o-Cresol
p-Nitrophenol
m-Cresol
Bendiocarb phenol
Arsenic
p-Cresol
p.p'-DDT
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Barium
o-Nitrophenol
Dieldrin
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Chromium (Total)
Beryllium
Cyanides (Total)
BenzoQOfluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Diethyl phthalate
Chlorodibromomethane
Carbofuran phenol
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
13
9
g
0
16
13
2
1
3
5
. . 2
13
5
I
1
2
1
10
4
. 2
10
29
29
29
29
76
32
13
19
6
29
13
2
127
7
32
5
5
2
1
29
6
3
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
1
. 0
- 0
1
5
1
1
0
1
3
0
0
1
2
2
2
2
0
9
0
0
5
5
5
5
87
5
0
1
10
5
• o
2
70
26
26
2
2
0
1
5
3
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
14
9
8
I
21
14
3
1
4
8
2
13
6
3
3
4
3
10
13
2
10
34
34
34
34
163
37
13
20
. 16
'34
13
4
197
33
58
7
7
2
2
34
9
4
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: SOAP & DETERGENT MANUFACTUR
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Diethyl phthalate 7 07
Chloroethane . 808
BenzoOOfluoranthene 8 0 8
Chromium (Total) . 12 2 14
Chloroform 10 0 10
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 0 1
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers) 01 1
Selenium 0 4 4
MethoxychJor "Oil
Toxaphene 0 1-1
Toluene ~ 11 0 II
Hexachlorobutadiene 8 0 8
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 5 4 9
Lead 12 3 15
Hexachlorobenzene .8 0 8
Pyrene 707
Mercury - All Others 5 4 9
Ethyl benzene • 10 0 10
Heptachlor 0 1 1
Methylene chloride 10 0 10
Fluorene 7 0 7
Fluoride 3 ' 1 , 4
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyrene 1 0 1
Hexachloroethane 8 0 8
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo 1 0 1
Fluoranthene 707
SUver 1 2 . 3
Endrin 0 • 1 1
Tetrachloroethylene 10 0 10
2,4-Dichlorophenol 7 0 7
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 12 1 13
2-Chlorophenol 7 0 7
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 7 1 8
Vinyl chloride 8 0 8
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 7 0 7
1,1-Dichloroethylene 8 08
1,1-Dichloroethane 90 9
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 80 8
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyaceticacid/2,4,5-T 0 1 1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 70 7
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10 0 10
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum dfo-, m-, andp-xyle 2 0 2-
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 9 0 9
Trichloroethylene 8 08
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: STEAM ELEC POWER GENERATING
UTS Constituents
Tribromomethane/Bromoform
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2.3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Zinc
1,1-Dichloroelhane
1,1 -Dichloroethylene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, and p- xyle
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Vinyl chloride
1,2,4,5-TetrachIorobenzene
Vanadium
2-sec-Butyi-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
1,2-Dichloroetbane
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
o-Nitropbenol
m-Dichlorobenzene
alpha-BHC
p-Nitrophenol
delta-BHC
bis(2-Chloroetbyl)ether
p.p'-DDE
Aldrin
p-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
Anthracene -
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Benzene
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bcta-BHC
Bendiocaib phenol
p-Cresol
o-Cresol
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
gamma-BHC
Acenaphthene
cis-1,3 •Dichloropropylene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits.
1
2
19
29
19
20
2
230
I
2
4
15
2
2
3
1
10
29
2
29
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
I
0
0
5
3
0
0
93
0
1
0
6
2
0
0
2
5
5
2
5
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
2
2
19
34
22
20
2
323
1
3
4
2.1
4
2
3
3
15
34
4.
34
1
1
1
I
1 .
1
1
1
1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: STEAM ELEC POWER GENERATING
UTS Constituents
Dibenz(a,h)amhracene
Benzene -
Chlorobenzene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Cyanides (Amenable)
Carbon disulfide
Chrysene
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomcrs)
Dimethyl phthalate
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Cadmium
Bromodichloromethane
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Mercury - All Others
Pyrene
Sulfide
Diphenylnitrosamine
Hexachlorobenzene
Lead
Methylene chloride
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort
Fluorene
Toluene
Hexachloroethane
Endrin
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Selenium
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Indeno (l,2,3-c,d) pyreae
Silver
Fluoride
Thallium
Total PCBs (sum of all PCB isomers, or all Aroclo
Fluoranthene
Ethyl benzene
Toxaphene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
Trichloroethylene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
4
20
2
4
32
0
1
13
2
4
1
65
1
4
64
1
4
2
4
95
1
64
0
21
3
16
2
3
74
2
2
4
39
10
4
14
3
13
13
19
19
20
29
3
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
5
8
0
3
26
1
3
0
0
0
I
67
I
4
68
3
1
d
3
88
2
68
3
7
I
0
3
1
71
0
0
5
47
6
19
32
2
6
0
0
2
3
5
2
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
,
9
28
2
7
58
1
4
13
2
4
2
132
2
8
132
4
5
2
7
183
3
132
3
28
4
16
5
4
145
2
2
9
86
16
23
46
5
19
13
19
21
23
34
5
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: SUGAR PROCESSING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
p,p'-DDD 0 1 i
Benz(a)amhracene 1 0 1
Acenaphthylene 0 . 1
m-Cresol 1 0
P,P'-DDT o i
Dimethyl phthalate 0 1
Dibenz(a,h)amhracene 1 0
Diethyl phthalate 0 1
Benzo(a)pyrene • 1 0
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene 1 0 .
Dieldrin 0 1
Di-n-propylnitrosamine 0 1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 10
Chloroform 1 0
Chloroethane 0 1
Chrysene 01 1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 0 1
Chlordane (alpha and gamma isomers) ., 0 1 1
Carbon tetrachloride 0 1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate 01 1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene . 1 01
Carbofuran phenol 1 01
Di-n-octyl phthalate 0 1 1
Cadmium 10 1
Di-n-butyl phthalate 0.1 1
Chlorobenzene 0 11
Endrin Oil
Mercury - All Others 2 0 2
Toxaphene 0 1 1
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 2 0 2
Total PCBs (sum of all PCS isomers, or all Aroclo 2 0 2
Pyrcne 0 11
Fluorene 0 1
Hexachloroethane 0 1
Methylene chloride ' 0 1
Methyl parathion ' 0 1
Indeno (1,2,3-c.d) pyrene 1 0
Silvex/2,4,5-TP 0 1
Heptachlor . 0 1
Sulfide 235
Fluoranthene 0 11
Hexachlorobutadiene 0 1 1
Hexachlorobenzene 0 1 1
Tetrachloroethylene 01 1
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: SUGAR PROCESSING
UTS Constituents
Ethyl benzene
Lead
Toluene
Heptachlor epoxide
1,1 -Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyaceticacid/2.4,5-T
Trichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
1,1.1 -Trichloroethane
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2-Chlorophenol
1,1-Dichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acio72,4-D
Trichloromonofluoromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Zinc
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
I
0
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
Limits
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
I
1
0
I
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
I
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bendiocarb phenol
p-Cresol
Benz(a)anthracene
Acrylonitrile
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Barium
Acenaphthene
o-Nitrophenol
Antimony
p,p'-DDD
Benzene
78
78
2
2
2
0
2
0
2
80
0
0
2
3
3
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
3
4
1
1
81
81
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
83
4
1
3
1 Ml/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: TEXTILE MILLS
UTS Constituents
m-Dichlorobenzene
p-Nitrophenol
Arsenic
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Acenaphthylene
p,p'-DDD
Acrolein
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
Anthracene
p-Dichlorobenzene .
Die thy! phthalate
Chloroethane
Cadmium
Chlorodibromomethane
Carbofuran phenol
Chlorobenzene
Chrysene
Beryllium •
Dimethyl phthalate
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
Cyanides (Amenable)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Cyanides (Total)
Chloroform
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chloromethane/Methyl chloride
Dieldrin
Chromium (Total)
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Hexachlorocyclppentadiene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Selenium ' •..
Mercury - All Others
Pyrene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Fluoride
Stiver
Mercury • Nonwastewater from Retort
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
2
80
3
4
2
0
1
78
78
2
2
2
2
5
0
78
2
2
0
2
2
0
5
2
2
5
2
2
2
1
102
2
0
2
3
6
2
2
2
1
2
6
2
2
No. of Permits Total No. of
With Monitoring Permits With
Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
0
3
6
4
0
1
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
6
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
1
8
0
0
8
4
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
1
9
0
0
0
3
7
9
1
1
2
83
9
8
2
1
1
81
81
2
- 2
2
2
11
1
81
2
2
1
2
2
1
13
2
2
13
6
2
2
1
106
2
I
2
4
15
2
2
2
4
9
15
3
3
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: TEXTILE MILLS
UTS Constituents
Thallium
Lead
Fluoranthene
Sulfide
Tetrachloroethylene
Methylene chloride
Fluorene
2,4-Diiuuotoluene
Zinc
1,1,1 •Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethy lene
1,1-Dichloroethane .
2.6-Dinitrotoluene v
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenoI/Dinoseb
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2-Dichloropropane
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Vinyl chloride
2-Chlorophenol
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
2-4-Dimethyl phenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
p-Nitrophenol
Arsenic
o-Nitrophenol
Accnaphthylcne
Accnaphthene
Barium
Anthracene
p-Cresol
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
Benz(a)anthracene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Bendiocarb phenol
PaHmiiim
Benzo(a)pyTene
Cyanides (Total)
Cyanides (Amenable)
Carbofuran phenol
No. of Permits
With Quantitative
Permit Limits
0
14
2
99
2
2
2
2
27
3
2
2
2
2
2
78
2
2
80
2
2
2
2
80
80
20
11
20
0
7
0
1
20
20
20
3
1
20
2
3
4
4
20
No. of Permits
With Monitoring
Only Permit
.Limits
2
14
0
3
0
2
1
0
34
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
6
2
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
1
1
7
6
6
4
0
6
2
4
2
2
6
Total No. of
Permits With
UTS Chemical
2
28
2
102
2
4
3
2
61
4
2
3
2
2
2
81
2
2
83
2
2
2
4
83
83
26
17
26
3
10
1
2
27
26
26
7
; ' 1
26
4
' 7
6
6
26
11/21/95
-------
Summary of UTS Constituents Included in NPDES Permits for: TIMBER PRODUCTS PROCESSING
UTS Constituents No. of Permits No. of Permits Total No. of
With Quantitative With Monitoring Permits With
Permit Limits Only Permit UTS Chemical
Limits
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2 3 5
Dibenz(a,e)pyrene 1 1 2
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3 47
Chromium (Total) 15 4 19
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 3 4
Benzene . 3 I 4
Chrysene 25 7
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 23
Pyrene , , Q 2 2
Indeno(1.2,3-c,d)pyrene 2 4 6
Toluene 4 1 5 • • - _
Mercury - Nonwastewater from Retort 3 2 5
Mercury - All Others 3 2 - 5
Ethyl benzene 2 1 3
Fluoride 1 1 2
Methylene chloride 1 0 1
Fluorene 1 3 4
HxCDDs (All Hexachlorodibenzp-p-diqxins) 0 2 2
Silver 2 1 3
Fluoranthene 6 3 9
Sulfide 01 1
Lead 5 4 9
1,1-Dichloroethane 1 01
2-4-Dimethyl phenol 20 7 27
TCDDs (All Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins) 0 2 2
Zinc 15 5 20
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 1 1 2
2,4-Diniuophenol 20 7 27
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 3 25
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 0 1
2-Chlorophenol 1 2 3
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol/Dinoseb 20 6 26
Xylenes-mixed isomers (sum of o-, m-, andp-xyle 2 \ 2>
2,4-Dichlorophenol 1 0 1
4.6-Dinitro-o-cresol 20 6 26
11/21/95
-------
ATTACHMENT F-3
NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION TESTING REQUIREMENTS
-------
161 A/Duk
11:53 AM
•APPENDIX D— NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION TESTING REQUIREMENTS
TABLE I— TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC Toxic POLLUTANTS BY
INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY FOR EXISTING DISCHARGES
Industrial category
Adhesives and
O€^u*miw*«*« •*»*•••*•** •**••••••••
Aluminum
Forming.........................
Auto and Other
Laundries.......
Battery Manufacturing........
Coal Mining..... ...................
Coil Coating.. ...... ..............
Copper Forming..................
Electric and
Electronic
Cnmnnnents... ................
^.VIU|J I. •••.!•».., ........ .......
Electroplating...................
Explosives
Manufacturing^.
Foundries...........:................
Gum and Wood
Chemicals
Inorganic Chemicals
Manufacturing, .,...,
Iron and Steel
Manufacturing,..,,...., ,,
Leather T*nning and
Pini china
Mechanical Products
M snnf BCTnrin P
Nonferrous Metals
Manufacturinff..
GC/MS Fractkml
Volatile
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Add
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 -
Base/
neutral
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pesticide
2
2
2
2
2
2
D-l
-------
161 A/Disk 91 • 11/24/92 - 11:53 AM
TABLE I—TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC Tone POLLUTANTS BY
INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY FOR EXISTING DISCHARGES (CONTINUED)
Industrial category
Ore Mining... .._,..,r, ,.......,,,,
Oreanic Chemical*
Manufacturing—.—.—
Paint and Ink
Formulation.——
Pesticides...............—..
Petroleum Refining.—...—.
Pharmaceutical
ppyp^nni QHS«« •••••••••••• •••• •
Photographic
Equipment and
Supplies.-.....-.-..-.-......
Plastic and Synthetic
Materials
Manufacturing.-.—.—..
Plastic Processing...............
Porcelain Enameling—.—.
Printing and
Publishing. .n,....,, T ...
Pulp and Paper Mills
Rubbrr Processing
Soap and Detergent
Mannfarnirinff -
Steam Electric Power
Plants. - •«
TextiteMfli^
Timber Products
Processing. ..................
GC/MS Fraction1
Volatile
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Add
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Base/
neutral
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pesticide
.2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 The toxic pollutants in each fraction are listed in Table U.
2 Testing required.
D-2
-------
161 A/Duk fl -. 11/24/92 - 11:53 AM
TABLE n—ORGANIC TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN EACH OF FOUR FRACTIONS IN
ANALYSIS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROSCOPY (GS/MS)
Volatile*
IV acroltin
2V acrylonitrile
3V benzene
5V bromofonn
6V carbon tetnchloride
7V chlorobenzene
8V chlorodibromomethane
9V chloroethane
10V 2-chloroethyivinyl ether
11V chloroform
12V dichlorobromomethane
14V 1.1-dichloroethane
1SV 1.2-dichloroethane
16V U-dichhloroethylene
17V 1.2-dichloropropane
18V 13-dichloropropylene
19V ethylbenzene
20V methyl bromide
21V methyl chloride
22V methylene chloride
23V 1,1.2,2-tetnchloroethane
24V tetnchloroethylene
25V toluene
26V 1.2-trans-dichloroethylene
27V l.Ul-trichloroethane
28V 1,1.2-trichloroethane
29V tiichlbroethylene
31V vinyl chloride
Acid Compounds
1A 2-chlorophenol
2 A 2,4-dichlorophenol
3AX 2,4^limethylphenol
4A 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
5A 2,4-dinitrophenol
6A 2-nitrophenol
7A 4-nitrophenol
8A p-chloro-m-cresol
9A pentachlorophenol
10A phenol
11A 2,4,6-trichlorophenol
D-3
-------
16lA/Diik «1 • 11,14/92 • 11:53 AM
TABLE n—ORGANIC Toxic POLLUTANTS IN EACH OF FOUR FRACTIONS IN
ANALYSIS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROSCOPY (GS/MS)
(CONTINUED)
Base/Neutral
IB acenaphihene
2B acenaphthylene
3B anthracene
4B benzidine
SB benzo(a)anthracene
6B benzo(a)pyrene
7B 3,4-benzofluoranthene
8B benzo(ghi)perylene
9B benzo(k)fluoranthene
10B bis(2-chlorbeihoxy)methane
1 IB bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
12B bis(2-chldroisopropyl)ether
13B bis(2-ethylhexyi)phthalate
14B 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
1SB butylbenzyl phthlate
16B 2-chloronaphthalene
17B 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
18B chrysene
19B dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
20B 1^-dichlorobcnzcne
21B 13-dichlorobenzene
22B 1.4-dichlorobenzene
23B 33'-dichlorobenzidine
24B diethyl phthalate
25B dimethyl phthalate
26B di-n-butyl phthalate
27B 2,4-dinitrotoluene
28B 2.6^iinitrotoluene
29B di-n-octyl phthalate
30B 1.2-diphenylhydrazine (as azobenzene)
31B fluroranthene •
32B fluorene
33B hexmchlorobenzene
34B hexachlorobuudiene
35B hexachlorbcyclopentadiene
36B hexachloroethane
37B indeno<1^3-cd)pyTene
38B isophorone
39B napthalene
40B nitrobenzene
41B N-nitrosodimethylamine
42B N-niirosodi-n-propylamine
43B N-nitrosodiohenvlamine
-------
161 A/Disk *1 • 11/24/92 • 11:53 AM
TABLE n—ORGANIC Toxic POLLUTANTS IN EACH OF FOUR FRACTIONS IN
ANALYSIS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROSCOPY (GS/MS)
(CONTINUED)
Base/Neutral (continued)
44B pnenantnrene
45B pyrene
46B 1.2,4-trichlorobenzene
Pesticides
IP aldrin
2P alpha-BHC
3P beta-BHC
4P garama-BHC
5P delta-BHC
6P chlordane
7P 4,4'-DDT
8P 4.4'-DDE
9P 4,4'-DDD
10P dieldrin
1 IP alpha-endosulfan
12P beta-endosulfan
13P endosulfan sulfate
14P endrin
15P endrin aldehyde
16P heptachlor
17P heptachlor epoxide
18P PCS-1242
19P PCB-1254
20P PCB-1221
21P PCB-1232
22P PCB-1248
23P PCB-1260
24P PCB-1016
25P loxaphene
D-5 -
-------
161 A/Disk «1 - 11/24/92 • 11:53 AM
TOXIC POLLUTANTS (METALS AND CYANIDE) AND TOTAL
PHENOLS
Antimony, Total
Arsenic, Total
Beryllium, Total
- '--— Total
Chromium, Total
Copper. Total
Lead, Total
Mercury, Total
Nickel, Total
Selenium. Total
Silver. Total
Thallium. Total
D-6
-------
161 A/Duk *1-ll/24>92- 11:33 AM
TABLE rv—CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS REQUIRED
TO BE TESTED BY EXISTING DISCHARGERS IF EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT
Bromide
Chlorine, Total Residual
Color
Fecal Coliform
Fluoride
Nitrate-Nitrite
Nitrogen, Total Organic
Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
Radioactivity
Sulfate
Sulfide
Sulfite
Surfactants
Aluminum, Total
Barium, Total
Boron, Total
Cobalt Total
Iron, Total
Magnesium, Total
Molybdenum. Total
Manganese, Total
Tin, Total
Titanium. Total
D-7
-------
16lA/Duk
- 11:53 AM
TABLE V—-TOXIC POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES REQUIRED TO
IDENTIFIED BY EXISTING DISCHARGERS IF EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT
Toxic Pollauntt
Uazarootu Si
ildehyde
Allyl alcohol
AJlyl chloride
Aayl acetate
Aniliae
Benzoniaile
Beazyl chloride
Butyl acetate
Butylamine
Pap tan
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Cirtaoo disulfide
Cblorpyrifos
Cresol
Cychlohexane
2,4-D (2.4-DichkHophenaxy acetic acid)
DiaziooD
Dichlobenil
Dichlone
2«2JDictaloropropKniic acid
Dichlorvos
Dietbyl amine
Dimethyl amine
Dintxobenzene
Diquat
DisulfotOD
Epkhlorobydtin
EthiOQ
Ethyteae diamme
Ethylene
Formaldehyde
Furfural
Guthioo
bopropan
Kelthaae
i rVHrfTy'"*"***** sttuooaie
Malathi
Methoxychlor
Methyl OK
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl paraihioo
MeviBfiboi
Mexacarbaie
Monoethyl
MoDometbyl
Nated
Napi
Nitrotoluene
Parathioo
PtiextolsiiUaoaie
Pttosccne
Pioparjite
Propyleae oxide
Pyrahrms
QuiDOlme
Resorcmoi
Strootimii
Strychnine
Styrene
2.4 J-T (2.4^-Trichloropoenoxy acetic acid)
TOE CTetradikvodipheirylethane)
2,4^-TP [2X2.4.5*Trichlarophenoxy) propanoic acid]
Trichlorofaa
Triethaaolamiaedodecylbeozenesalfonate
Trkthylamiae
TrimethylaflUBe
Uraniun
Vi
Vinyl
Xylene.
Xylenol
D-8
-------
161A/Diik *1 - 11/24AJ2 - 11:53 AM
TABLE 1—TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC Toxic POLLUTANTS BY
INDUSTRY CATEGORY
Industry Category
Adhesives and Sealants —
A 1»«M2«ft»MM * - *
f\ IUTT1 111 lull ¥111 1 • 11 fi v -•••••••••
Auto and other laundries.....
Battery Manufacturing
Coal Mining..........................
Coil Coating.... . —
Copper forming~...~~..~~~..
Electric and Electronic
Electroplating...........
Explosives manufacturing...
Foundries.. .............. ........ .
Gum and wood (all sub-
pans except D and F. —
Subpan D— tall oil rosin......
Subpan F — rosin-based
Inorganic chemicals manu-
facturing, , ,.,.,,,..,,.. ,1,.,. ,,,
Iron and steel manufactur-
ing
T^ffflfy tatn^tii£ and finifh-
ttif
Mechanical products manu-
facturing, ,„.,.,,. T „ —
Nonferroos metals mann-
facturipff . ,. ,.,, ,....
.
Volatile
C1)
(l)
(i) .
(i)
(i)
(i)
(*)
t1)
C1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
( 1 )
C1)
/1\ .
(1)
GOMS
Add
C1)
(i)
(i)
. C)
C1)
C1)
(1)
(Ij
(1)
(1)
(1)
C1)
C1)
(1)
/1\
Fraction2
Base/
Neutral
C1)
(*)
(i)
(i)
(!)•
(1)
(1)
(*)
(1)
C1)
(1)
C1)
(1)
C1)
(1)
(1)
Pestl-
dde
(l)
(1)
(»)
D-U
-------
161 A/Disk »1 • 11/24/92 • 11:53 AM
TABLE I—TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC Toxic POLLUTANTS BY
INDUSTRY CATEGORY (CONTINUED)
Industry Category
Ore mining (applies to the
base and precious
metals/Subpart B).......~
Organic chemicals manu-
Paint and ink formulation —
Pesticides................".....—..
Petroleum refining. ..
Pharmaceutical prepara-
Photographic equipment
and supplies..................
Plastic and synthetic mate-
rials manufacturing.
Plastic processing .
Porcelain enameling........
Printing and publishing......
Pulp and paper board
mills— see footnote3.....
Rubber processing......
Soap and detergent manu-
• facturing...... ....................
Steam electric power
plants.......
•
Textile mills (Subpart C —
Greige mills are exempt
from this table)....................
Timber products process-
ing 1 — ...
Volatile
(*)
(*)
(*)
(i)
(l)
(l)
c1)
(l)
(l)
(*)
(1)
(l)
(1)
(*)
GOMSI
Add
(I)
(1)
(l)
(*)
(l)
(1)
C1)
(1)
(*)
(*)
•C1)
(1)
(*)
^notion*
Base/
Neutral
(*)
(1)
0)
(1)
(')
C1)
(^)
fl\
• (')
C1)
PesU-
dde
(^)
0)
(i)
c>
C)
1 Testing required.
2 The pollutants in each fraction are listed in Item V-C
3. and Paperboard Mills.
Editorial Note: The words "This revision" refer to the document published at
48 FR 14153. Apr. 1.1983.
D-12
-------
161 A/Disk »1 • 11/24/92 - U:53 AM
TABLE i—TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC Toxic POLLUTANTS IY
INDUSTRY CATEGORY(CONTINUED)
Subpart3
j^
?
c« «
D
L
F. . ..
G. ..
u
• •«••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••»•••••••••
L_ . -
J •••••••••••••••»••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• '
M. ...
(X... .. . .... _
P
Q
R ; T
S .................
T '
U--,.,^-,-,---^,,--------
GC/MS Fraction
VGA
2
2
2
2
(>)
(»)
(')
(])
(>)
(»)
(»)
(»)
(»)
(»)
(!)
(>)
<])
2
(»)
C1)
(»)
Add
(l)
(»)
(»)
C1)
C1)
(>)
(')
(>)•
(>)
(>)
(l)
(»)
(>)
(J)
C1)
(«)
(»)
(»)
(»)
C1)
(»)
Base/
Neutral
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
(«)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
(>)
Pesti-
cides
)
2
1 Must tesL '
2 Do not test unless "reason to believe" it is discharged.
3 Subpans are defined in 40 CFR Pan 430-
[48 FR 14153. Apr. 1.1983. as amended at 49 FR 38050. Sept 26.1984; 50 FR 6940.
Feb. 19. 1985]
-------
ATTACHMENT F-4
SUMMARY OF UTS CONSTITUENTS IN ICRT WASTES
FROM CASE STUDY FACILITIES
-------
Summary of Underlying Universal Treatment Standard (UTS) Wastes
in ICRT Wastes from Case Study Facilities
UTS Constituent* Expected in Waslewalers from Case Study Facility #1
WWfl
triethyl unine
dichloromethane
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phlhalale
chlorobenzeoe
barium
copper
nickel
zinc
acetone
p-dichlorobenzeen
o-dichlorobenzene
chloroform
methyl chloride '
cyanide
possible:
aldicarb
WWI2
methyl isobulyl kelone (MIK)
acetone
dichloromeuune
lunhtHalntA
Ihiodicarb
pyridine
mnthanol
WW*2a
MIK
possible:
acetone
dichloromelhane
naphthalene
Ihiodicarb
pyridine
. melhanol '
WW*2b
MIK
possible:
acetone
dichlorome thane
naphthalene
Ihiodicarb
pyridine
methanol
WW*2c
MIK
possible:
acetone
dichloromelhane
naphthalene
Ihiodicarb
pyridine
melhanol
WW«2d
MIK
possible:
acetone
dichloromelhane
naphthalene
Ihiodicarb
pyridine
melhanol
UTS Constituents Expected in Wastewalers from Case Study Facility H/l
WWJfl
No UTS constituents
expected
WW*2
aniline
WW#3
No UTS
constituents
expected
WWI4
phenol
WW*5
phenol
WW«6
No UTS
constituents
expected
-------
UTS Constituents Expected in Waslewalers from Case Study Facility 03
WW*|
chromium
WW/T2
chromium
WW/K3
phenol
WWW
phenol
WW#5
phenol
WW#6
phenol
UTS Constituents Expected in Waslewaters from Case Study Facility #4
WWII
carbeodizum
aniline
melhanol
WWf7
No UTS constituents
expected
WW/T2
carbendizum
o-phenylenediamine
aniline
melhanol
WWf8
No UTS constituents
expected
WW*3
carbendizum
o-phenylenediamine
aniline
methanol
WW(T9
acetone
phenol
xylene •
WW#4
carbendizum
methyl ethyl keione
aniline
WW«IO
pyridine
WW#5
carbendizum
methyl ethyl ketone
aniline
ww/m
acetone
pyridine
WW*6
No UTS constituents
expected
.
-------
ATTACHMENT F-5
SUMMARY OF CASE STUDY FACILITY PCS PARAMETERS
COMPARED TO UTS LIST
-------
Facility *1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potientially Addressed under NPOES Permit
state
WV1
WV1
WV1
VW1
WV1
WV1
WV1
iwvi
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
swr
WV1
WV1
WV1
WVT
WV1
wvt"
tSvl
WV1
WV1
mi
WvT
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
Mvi
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
«Mvi
VMV1
Pipei
001
001
001
001
INT
001
DOS
001
odi
SUM
OTSl .
001
001
001
SUM
001
001
SUM
SUM
601
66t
001
SUM
001
001
005
001
INT
009
001
NT
001
001
SUM
001
001
001
001
001
001
005
001
60S
NT
PCS
Code
39175
38180
32104
34S4S
34010
34010
34010
65614
14469
32730
42730
34461
34546
32730
32730
34571
32730
32730
32730
32730
14591
34538
327tt
32730
34447
34696
34696
34696
34423
34423
34423
34566
32730
327ST
01051
34396
39702
39700
343B1
34376
SOTT"
37371
J7JH
HSTT"
Pafamet« Name
VINYL CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
BROUOFORU
TRANS 1.2-DtCHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TOLUENE
TOLUENE
TElAAovukuETriVLENE
PYRENE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENANTHRENE
4-W IKoPHtNOL
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
M-DCHLOROBENZENE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLtCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
2-MTROPHENOL
1 ,2-DiCHLOROBENZENE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLtCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
NITROBENZENE •
NAPHTHALENE
NAPHTHALENE
NAPHTHALENE
OCHLOROMETHANE
DtOHLOROilETHAlE
DtCHLOROUElHANE
1.3-OCHLOROBENZENE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
LEAD. TOTAL (AS PtiJ
HEXACHLOROETHANE
HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE
BHC
R.UORENE
FLUORANTHENE
ETHYL BENZENE
EUM. BENZENE .
ETHYLBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
UTS Name
Vinyl chlonde
Tnehtoroethytene
Tribfomomelhane/Bfamoform
lian«-1.2-Dichloroec-92
29-Jun-99
16Oec9J
29-Jun-99
MJuiv&a
l6Dac.U
29-Jun-99
29-Jun99
~3ffOof«
29 Jun99
29-Jun-99
29-Jun-99
29 Jun-99
29Jun99
2»Jun-99
18-Da&B3
MJunU
3frOd-66
latwcoj
Moraloi
Orty .
0
0
a "
0 "'
1
6
0
0
0 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o •
0
fi— -
0
0 "
6
0
0
0'
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0~
o —
0
0
0
0 -
0 "
1
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
Stale
WVI
WVT
WVT
WV1
wvT
WVI
wvTl
WV1
wvr
wvi
WVI
WVI
wvl
wvi
wvi
wvT
wvr
WVI
wvi
wvi
wvi
wvr
wvf.
wvil
wvi!
wvi
WVT
wvT
WVI
WW
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi
wvi
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
Pip**
ooT-
oor
BoT
ooi
001
003
001
001
DDT
aaf
INT
005
001
001
ooi
001
001
SUM
401
101
60S
ooT
Mi
001
001
6BT
Ml
ooi
001
Wf
SUM
Mi
001
001
001
Ml
001
001
SUM
661
SUM
001
001
001
PCS
Code
3434Y~
34336
30110
00720
00726
007tt
00720
34320
34418
32108
32108
32106
34311
32105
34301
32102
32730
32734
81405
77700
77700
38677
38693
39100
34242
79531
34247
34030
34030
34524
32730
32730
34220
34215
34200
34200
32730
34657
12730
32730
32730
34586
32730
34608
Paiametef Name
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
UTS Name '
CYANIDE. TOTAL (AS CN)
CYANIDE. TOt AL(AS CN) . '
CYANIDE. TOTAL JAS CM
CYANIDE. TOTAL (AS CN
CHRYSENE
METHYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROETHANE. TOTAL WEIGHT
OiaROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
CARBCiM TCTRACHLClKiDE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
CARBOFURAN
CARBARYL TOTAL
CARBARYL TOTAL
BROMOMETHANE
BROMODtCHLOROUETHANE EFFLUENT
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
3.4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
BENZENE
BENZENE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
ANTHRACENE
ACRYLONfTRlLE
AOENAPHTHVLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
4.6-UMIHOOCRESOL
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS, TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS, TOTAL RECOVERABLE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
J.iOlUETHYiPHENbL
Dunelhyl phlhalate
Dwlhyrphlhalate
LVn butyl phlhalale
Cyanide* (Total)
Cyanide* (Total)
Cyanides (Amenable)
Cyantdet (Amenable)
Chtytene
CNoromemane/Mclnyl chloride
Chlorofann
CNOVIMMIII |
CNorafonn
Chtoioethane
CntoKKktrunomethen*
Chtarabwuene
Canunjf an pftend
MavtooMJivi phanol
Caitoluran
CartMiyF ~
CMbwyi
BromomctharaMelhyl bronvde
BcomodKNoramMhan*
biMi-ElhytSeKyOpNnaUla " "'
B*nzo(k)Buaranlhan«
BeniotbJIuwanlhene
Beruofalpyrane
Bentene
Bentene
Bens(a)anllvacene
Bendiocart) phenol
Dendmcaib phenol
Anthracene
AciytonMfet ' -
Acenaphthytene
Acenaphthene
4.6-OineVo-o«*«ol
4.6-binili(H>-c(Mol
4.6-6«lfO-o-cfe«o(
2-eac-BulvM.6-"
f
b"
0
a
a
a"
'5"
0'
r_
a
0"
i
i
i
i •
a~
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potientially Addressed under NPDES Permit
Stale
WVI
WVI
WVT
wvT
WVI
wvT
WVI
WVI
«Wr.
wvr
WVI
wvT
WVf
WVI
WVI
wvT
wvi
WVI
wvT
WVf
WVI
WVI
SWT
KvT
wvT
wvT"
wvr
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
Pipe*
SUM
DOT
001
SUM
001
001
001
001
DM
DOT
001
001
001
001
553
021
021
o5i
INf
JRB *
025
016
va~
053"
62T
016
023
020
023
020
023
016
018
017
017
017
028
517
016
017
018
017
018
020
PCS
Code . Paiametei Name
32730
34626
34611
32730
32730
34616
34601
34541
S110J
34551
34501
34486.
34511
34506
00310
00400
00680
50060
00616
00400
00680
50050
50050
00340
00400
00630
00530"
50050
00630
00340
D0556
00680
D0556
00680
50050
00556
00310
OD5JO~
00310
00400
00340
00340
00530
00680
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
2.6-DINrTROTOLUENE
2.4-OINITROTOLUENE
PHgNOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOLICS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
T'.^DlKtlTHaPHENOL
2.44XCHLOROPHENOL
1 ,2-OICHLOROPROPANE
I.S^MCHLOROETHANE
1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
VINYLIDENE CHLORDE (1.1-OICHLOROETHENE)
1.1-DCHLOROETHANE
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
BCO.S4AY(20DEG C)
PH
CARBON. TOf ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
NITROGEN. AMMONIA TOTAL (AS N)
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW, IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL} (COD)
PH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (MtGHlEvEL) (COD)
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-CR AV METH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OH THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
BOD. 5-DAY (20 DEG C)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
BOD. 54>AY (20 DEG C)
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM. (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
CARBON. TOT ORGAMC (TOC)
UTS Name
2-4~"Ciimelnyt phenol
i.'Sttnilrotoiuene
2~.4-"Diralrolbiuene
2.4-bin*fophenol
iT-SnViophenol
2.4-Dinilrophenal
2.4-Dichloiophenal
1 ,2-DtcMaiopropane
1.4 OicWoroelhane
1.2.4-Trichtarobeniene
1.1-Oict*voelhytene.
1.1-OicNonMlhane
1.1.2-TricMoTOeihane
1.1.1 Tncntoforlhane
/
Quanliy
Avg
"32
" 753
334
"32
" "06
21
157
" 617
"274
561
064
. 065
062
085
QuanUy
Man
82
18 94
842
"82
104
J63
452
927
"85
414
1 01
1 74
16
218
' ' -'.
-- - •
'
Cone
Mm
Cone Cone Cone
Avg Max Unas
Quantity
Units
! KG/DAY
jlBS/D ""
ILBSAJ
KG/DAY
MonKcx
End Dale
2d-Jun-09
29 Jun 99
29 Jun 99
29-Jun^9
MJun'88
6
29-Jun-99
29-Jun-99
29 Jun 99
~29Ju7iM
16 Dec 92
16 Dec 92
"58XS59
29 Jun99
16 Doc 92
59TGSM
29 Jun 99
29Ju^99
-------
Facility #1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
sine
(wvT
WVT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvl
wvl
WVI
WVI
wvl
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvT
wvi
WVI
wvi
wvr
wvh
WVI
WVI
WVT
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WV1
WVi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvfi
WVI
wvi
PCS.
PipeHCode
018
aw
018
020
017
020
020
017
020
020
018
030
027
030
028
028
028
028
029
028
016
028
010
036
555-
030
030
029
029
029
029
029
029
026
023
023
024
024
024
025
025
025
026
026
00630
006U ~
50050
00310
00630
00400
00530
00310
00558
00630
00400
00656
00556
00630
00556
00630
00680
50050
00310
00400
00556
00340
OOSJO
00400
00400
00340
00310
50050
00680
00630
00656
00530
00340
00400
00680
50090
00400
00680
50050
00400
00680
50050
00630
00340
PaiamMei Name
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL TDET (AS N)
CARBON TOTC5«GW6C1T6C~)
FlOWTiN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
BOO. 5 DAY (20 DEC C)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 QET (AS N)
PH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
BOO.S-DAY(20DEG C).
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
PH
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV UETH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV UETH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
BOO. 5-OAY (20 DEC C)
PH
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR4SRAV METH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG C)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
NTTRnE PLUS NrTRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
ON. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLOS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRUTREATMENT PLANT
PH
CARBON, TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRO TREATMENT PLANT
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
UTS Name
- ;-
- -
Quant ty
.... •..
• •- •-• -
... ....„
Quantity
Man
;•;:
- -• - — •-•
-. .
Cone
Min
-
.- •
- •
—
COIK.
*."«
-
-
-•-
-
(.If It
Mill
....
—
Cone
Units
MGA. '
MG/L
MGO
MG/L "
MGA.
SJ
MG/C
MGA.
MG/L - -
MGA.
SU
MGA: " "
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
asr— --
MGA." '
MGD
MGA.
so
MGA. - ""••
MGA.
MGA.
SU
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGD
MGA.
MG/L " ""
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA:" "
MGD
so -
MGA. " "
MGb " "
SU
MGA.
UG0
MGA.
MGA.
Quantity
UraU
— —
'
_ , , ,
1 _ .
End Date
"29 Jun99
" 16 Deb 9-
~~29-Jun99
29-Jun-9)
"K-3un-9!
=ss
29-JUH-9!
29-Jun9f
29-Jun-9S
29-Jun99
29Jun9S
~ TO Ow 92
29 Jun99
29-Jun"99
"»iin99
"»]un-99
~29Jun'9S
~ 29-Jun' 99
-»-35n-99
fFDec92
18 Dec 92
--^g;*
29-Juh-99
29Jun-99
MJunM
16-D0C-92
-SS:»
28Jun99
29 Jun-99
29Jun99
~X£ntt
Mofulw
Only
.
i "
i
i
.... .
i
....
i ""
....
--
-
i"
i
r_ .
"
--
-------
Facility *1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPOES Permit
PCS Quanliy Quantity Cone Cone Cone Cone Quahuy Moniiw
Slat* Pip* • Cod* Paiametei Name UTS Name Avg . Man Mm Avg Max Urals Unit End Dale Only
WVI
WW
jQ\l«
n» v i
WVI
WVI
Wvl'
WVI
WVI
WVT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvT
WVT
WVI
WvT
WVI
WVT
WvT
WVI
wvl
«|vi
WVI
WVI
wvl
WV1
WVI
WVI
WVI
WvT
wvr
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvl
WVI
wvr
030
026
026
026
OJ6~
027
027
027
027
027
026
003
002
016
002
ooJ
002
002
002
005
003
002
063
BbT~
003
003
003
003
003
003
005
005
002
001
INT
INT
SUM
001
001 .
001
001
002
001
00660
00530
00556
00630
00660
50050"
00310
00340
00400
00530
00630
00310
00400
00610
00530
00660
50050
50060
61426
62561
00400
00011
004C
10
ODelo
oMi
06M
15
16
34406
50050
50060
61426
62561
00660
00011
82562
00610
00660
34406
00840
00010
00011
00310
00400
00625
00010
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
oU.iGREAsEFREoNEXTR-GAAVME.TH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
rixMV; tni^xviAMi UN iww iNtMiMtwi P^AIMI
BOD. 5-DAY(20DEG C)
6XVGEN DEMAND CHEM (MGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
BOD. 5-DAY (20DEO C)
PH
NTTROGEN. AMMONIA TOTAL (AS N)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW, IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CHLORINE. TOTAL RESIDUAL
TOXICnY. CERIODAPHNIA CHRONIC
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. > 60 MINUTES
PH ' •
TEMPERATURE. WATER DEG FAHRENHEIT "
PH
NfflROGEN. AMMONIA TOTAL (ASN) •
NITROGEN. KJELDAHL TOTAL (AS N)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
ISOPHORONE
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CHLORINE. TOTAL RESCUAL
TOXICITY. CERIODAPHNIA CHRONIC
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. > 60 MINUTES
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
TEMPERATURE. WATER DEG FAHRENHEIT
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. MONTHLY TOTAL ACCUM
AMMONIA. UNIONIZED
CARBON. TOTORGAMC (TOC)
ISOPHORONE
CHLORIDE (AS CL)
TEMPERATURE. WATER DEG CENTIGRADE
TEMPERATURE. WATER DEO FAHRENHEIT
BOD, 6-DAY (20 DEG. C)
PH
NITROGEN, KJELDAHL TOTAL (AS N) .
NTTROGEN, AMMONIA TOTAL (AS N)
-.
~
: ..._.
—
."
-.._
244
~54itioo
1606
• - - •
,.. .. .. _ ..
743
.
743
K6~
316000
6003
6
...
6
6
6
_....
02
4
02
"02
05
4
02
4
~05
•
9
06
6
OS
9
110
9
~OS
"T5
6
2S0
06
6
110
66
110
0
IS
MGA.
MGA ' —
HSC
MGA.
MGA.
MOD
MGA.
MGA. '
SU
BGA:
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MOD
MGA.
CHRONCTOXC
SU
DEGF
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
UGA.
MGD
MGA.
CHRONCTOXC*
MGA.
DEGF
HIKFTJTES"
MGA.
MGA.
UGA.
DEGC
DEGF
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
.
LBS/D
occufttt
LB&D
i&S/O
LBSO
OCCUR/0
LBSA)
LBS/D
LBS/O
LB&O
LBS/D
LBSAD '
16 Dec 92
MJunM
29-Jun-OO
16-DK-B2
16-DK-02
20-Jun-M
29Jun-99
28-Jun-99
29-Jun-99
29Jmv99
29-Jun-B9
29-Jun-B9
29 Jun99
29Jun-99
29-JunB9
MJunM
29Jun-98
29-Jun-99
29 Jun99
29Jun99
29Jurv99
29 Jun 99
30-Od-ae
29-Jun;99
29 Jun 99
29 Jun 99
29 Jun 99
MJunM
20-Jun-M
29 Jun 99
29 Jun 99
29- Jun 99
16-Oac-92
^-3oSaw
29 Jun 99
30-Od-66
HJun-M
MJunM
30-Od-64
29-Jun-N
1
-
~
r~
i
i
i
0
0
1
d
i
0
i i ! : • i
!•- 0 lO 10 to 10
0
0
1
0
T~
o -
_ .
0 "'
0~~
1
r
o — •
i — •
a -
o
0
0
1
-------
Facility #1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
Stale Pipe*
wvTrsw"
WVT|BH~
wwrasT
wvi
wvi
WV1
WVI
wvr
WVT
WvT
wW
WVI
WVI
wvT
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
Wvi
wvr
WVI
WVT
wvr
Wvl
wvr
WVI
WVT
wvr
wvT
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvr
WVi
WVI
WVI
WVI
001
001
001
66T"
001"
001
B6T"
SbT'
001
015
513-
003
012
013
OlS
013
BH~
005
Si?"
BIT"
mr
015
515"
015"
015"
015
015
016
016
016
014
006
031
005
005
005
005
005
005
oil
006
PCS
Code
00011
6BB35
60688
34408
34561
50050
8i4bi i
6143$
74055
13581
6356}
00530
00310
00400
63562
50080
00400
00680
50050
BHST
00610
5oold
56BJT
OTEWT
00400
00530
QB5S6
00630
00660
50050
00310
00340
00400
00680
MfffiO .
00340
00635
S0050
50060
61436
83561
63563
)0660
00400
Paiametei Name
'tEMPERATURCWAfER~DEG~FAHRENH£IT
NlTRO^NTKJELDAHL ToTATlXs Nf "
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOG) "
iSOPHOffoT*
1.3-OICHLOROPROPENE. TOTAL WEIGHT
FLOW. IN CONDUrT OR TWRU TREATMENT' PL ANT
BKMSSAY (48 HR)
TOXICITY. CERIODAPHNIA ACUTE
COLIFORM. FECAL GENERAL
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. > 60 MINUTES
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. MONTHLY TOTAL ACCOM
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
BOO. WJAY (30 DEO C|
PH
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. MONTHLY TOTAL ACCUM
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC. (IOC]
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
NITROGEN. AMMONIA TOTAL (AS N)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
Cd CREASE FREON EXTR-GKAV METH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
BOD. 5-DAY (30 DEC C)
OXYGEN DEMAND, CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
NfTROGtN. KJELDAHL TOTAL (AS N)
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CHLORINE. TOTAL RESIDUAL
TOXICITY, CERKXMPHNIA CHRONIC
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. > 60 MINUTES
PH RANGE EXCURSIONS. MONTHLY TOTAL ACCUM
CARBON, TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
PH
UTS Name
... ._ ...._.
Quaillty
A
-------
Facility #1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS Quartiy Quantity
Suit Pipe • Code Parameter Name UTS Name Avg Max
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WV1
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WV1
WVI
WVI
WVI
v&pT
SjvT
WVI
WV1
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvr
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
011
008
008
008
000
000
000
010
010
010
Oil
006
065
066
060
086
066
068
064
065
068
085
085
065
B64™
084
060
084
089
088
058
080
060
080
088
088
088
087
068
088
067
087
067
087
00660
00400
00530
50050
00400
00660
50050
00400
00680
50050
00400
00011
00530
00556
00630
00400
00340
00310
00340
00556
,60830
00400
00340
00310
006JS
00556
00556
5548JT
00630
00400
00530
00400
00340
00310
00830
00530
OA5U
00310
00340
00310
00630
055S8
00530
00400
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
PH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH '
CARBON. TdTORGAMC (TOC) . .
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
TEMPERATURE. WATER DEO FAHRENHEIT
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (ASN)
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOO. 54MY(20DEG C) •
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
.
• 1 •
- - -
*
1
•
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N) •
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. 5-OAYJ26DCC Cj
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET. (ASN)
ON. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
PH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
PH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD, 5-DAY (20 DEC q
NTmmTPlUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
BOO. 5-DAY (20 DEG C)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. MJAYfJODEG C)
raiNiib P1U5 KNIRATE TOTAL i DET (AS N)
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV MElH
SOUDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
,
.. .... —
1
Cone
Mm
6
... '
-•
._. .
--
-----
Cone
A»g
30
Cone
Ua>
9
'60
t
t
. —
--•
73
.-
Cone Quantity Monitor
UniU Unit End Dale Only
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGD
SU
MGA.
MGD
SU
MGA.
MGD
SU
OEGF
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA. '"' '
MGA.
SU
MGA. •—
UGA.
MGA.
MGA.
HG7T
SU ' ~
MGA.
SU"
MGA.'
SU
MGA.
UG/L
MGA.
MGA.
UGIL
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
UGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
•
"'16 Dec 92'
M-Jun-09
-TOEJa
1flO»c92
16-DK-02
~n-Dk'-f2
29-Jurv99
29-Jun-99
29Jun99
29Jun98
~29Jun99
29 Jun99
29Jun99
~25juh~99
29 Jun»9
20-3un-dd
29-Jon-99
29Jun§9
'»Jun99
29Jun99
29Jun99
20-Jun-09
20-Jun-09
29Jun99
' ^0 Jun 09
20-Jun09
MJunOA
29Jun99
20-JunM
29Jurv99
' 29 -Jun-00
20-Jun-OO
MJuiv&A
20-Jun-Od
20-Jurv08
1
O""'"
1
1
r
i
1
i"
b~
....
i "
i
i
i
i
i .
i
i"
i
i
r
i
i
f
i
i"
1
r
i
i
i
i '
i
i
i
i
1 "
i
J —
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potientially Addressed under NPOES Permit
Slate
WVI
WVT
WVI
WVI
wvT
wvf
WVI
wvi"
wW
wvr
wvi
wVT
wvi
WVI
WVT
WvT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi.
WVfl
wvil
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WvT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WV1
PVC»
067"
066
o&tt
061
064'
BHT
060"
060
064
056
061
059
B58"
059
059
188
53a~
030
060.
067
061
jeT
063
063
060~~
062
061
062
062
062
062
061
061
061
063
077
103
076
162
101
077
MS
orr
PCS OuarUiv
Code Pwtmetef Name UTS Name Avg
00340
CK)556
00630
00310"
00530
00556
00530
00400
00310
00310
00340
00556
00530
00400
00346
00310
00^30
50050
00340
00630
00556
01830
00400
00340
00630
00630
00400
00530
00400
00340
00310
00630
00556
00530
00310
00400
00530
00310
00860
50050
00630
00630
00530
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL IIDET IAS N)
BOb.5-OAY(20DEGC)
SOLIDS. TOTAL suspCRbEB"
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
BOD. 3-DAY (20 DEG C)
BOD. 5-DAY (20 DEC C)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
Oft. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. 9-DAY (20 DEG C)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
NITRITE PLUS MTftATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OIL ft GREASE FREaN£XTR4jRAV M£TH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N) .
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
PH
SOUDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH "
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOO. 5-DAY (20 DEG C)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL i DET (AS N)
Oft. ft GREASE FREOti EXTR-GRAV ME"TH
SOLOS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
BOD.S
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPOES Permit
PCS Quanliy
SIM* Pip* • Code Paiametei Name UTS Name Avg
WVI
WvT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WV1
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVT
WVI
WVI
WV1
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
103
577'
077
o>8
070
076
076
060
07*
116
401
301
301
301
117
103
117
105
116
TO
115
Ms
105
105
117
071
076
072
072
072
07i
072
071
072
071
071
070
070
070
070
070
071
074
50050
00340
OOJRS
00630
00556
00530
00405
66530
00556
56656
£0080
50050
50050
39053
50050
00400
00400
00400
00660
SHKT
56635"
00886
oo*xr
50050
00530
00660
00400
00340
00400
00340
00310
00630
00556
005U
00630
00340
00310
00630
00556
00400
00340
00310
00556
00400
•FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
BOD. 5-DAY (JO DEO C)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED " '
PH
SOLOS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
OO. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
ALtMCARB
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
PH
PH "" "
CARBON. TOT ORGANC (TOC)
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOTOROAMC (TOC) '
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (Ceo)
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEC. C)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OK ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
NHHIlk PLUS NflRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM. (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG C)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG. C)
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
PH
OJJ2,
Quantity
Max
-
004
..-.'.
Cone
Mm
" 6
6
„
Cone Cone Cone Quantity
Avg Max Unas un<»
-----
....
9
9
.._.
50
UGO
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGD
MGD |
MGD
MGD
MGA.
MGD
SU
SU
SU
MGA.
SU
MGD
MGA.
SU
MGO
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MOA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
LBSO
LBSiD
End Dale
29 Jun-99
29 Jun 99
29- Jun-99
28 JunflO
29-Jun-9S
29Jun99
29- Jun 99
29-Jun-99
29-Jun-99
29-Jun99
29- Jun-99
29 Jun 99
29- Jun-99
»6Oec92
16 Dec 92
~59Ju7T59
29 Jun 99
29 Jun-99
16 Dec 92
16 Dec 92
29 Jun 99
-5SI
29 Jun 99
TOuSS
29 Jun 99
29- Jun-99
29 Jun99
~ T8 -Jun 90
29-Jun-99
29 Jun 99
29- Jun-99
HJun-M
29-Jun99
M JurvM
Morutot
Only
1
\
i
i
i
i
1 —
r
i
1
1
6
f~
o -
V
6 "
i
i
i
r
r
0
i
i
i
t
f
r -
i
i ~
i
i -
T
r
r
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPOES Permit
SMC
wvi
wvi
wvi
wvi
wvi
wvi"
wvi
wvi
wvf
wvi
wvi
wvi"
WVI
wvi
wvi
WvT
WV1
wvi"
wvi
wvi
wvi
wvi.
WV*
wvil
wvT
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
wvi
WVI
wvr
wvi
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
Pipe*
(075-
075-
675~
075-
074~
57JT
0*^4
698
074'
074
6/3
0/3
071
Oh
073
D7T
074"
037
538"
033"
038
038
038
035
037
640
037
036
IBH
036
035
039
031
038
043
043
051
043
043
043
030
043
040
043
PCS
Code
00556
08455-
OOW
00310
00630
00930
00530
00400
00340
00310
00630
00956
00930
00400
00340
OffJTO"
00556
00660
90050
09557T
00400
50050
00880"
00530
50050
00400
00400
50090
00680
OD4001
90090
00680
00310
00400
00310
50090
00996
00630
00996
00930
00680
00340
00680
90090
Parametef Name UTS Name
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR^RAV METH ~
PH - . •
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOO.S4AY(20DEGC)
1 ... _. ..
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N) |
SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED j .-...,.
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDEb ' '
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEU. (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. £DAY(2dDEG C)
1
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N) |
OIL ft GREASE FftEON EXWOftAVMETH - j - -.
SOLIDS, TOTAL SLMtPfclUD
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
BOD. 5 DAY (20 DEC C)
Oil GREASE FftEoNExTR^SRAV METH"
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
ON. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOrWGAKlC(TGCj" " "'~
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON, TOT ORGAMC (TOC)
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
BOD, 5-DAY (20 DEO C)
PH
BOO.S-OAYPODEG Ci
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
OH. ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OIL ft GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
• - • •- -
•
;
... . ....
Quartliy
-
: .--
Quantity
Man
— •
- -•-
• • - -
.
Coric
Mm
--
_ .
.. .
Cone
- -
....
....
•-
Lunc
Max
.
- -
Cone ' Quantity Uoiuloi
Units Urals End Date Only
MG/L
su~
H&L
MG/L
MGA,
MGA.
MG/L""
SU
MGA: :
flGAT"
MGA.
UG/C
MGA.*
su
MGA.
UG/L
flG/C
MGA
MGO~ --
M(3L
su -
MGD
UGX
MGD~
SU
SO
MGD
MGA.
so™ - —
MGD
MG/L
MGA.
su— '
BOA. - •""
lidD
UG/L
MGA:
MGA.
IGA.
MGA.
USK." "
MGA.
MCO"
._
, , , _
-
.
— -
—
~"
29 Jun 99
"29Juri99
" j9-Jun-99
29 Jun »
29 Jun 99
29 Jun 99
29 Jun »
~»-J5J.»!
II9:*!':??
""Jftlun.ftS
29 Jun «
29 Jun 99
~ 29 Jun 99
29 Juri 99
2S Jun9i
29 Jun 99
" 59 Jun"9S
_ 29 Jun 99
29 Jun 99
29 Jun M
~ flJTJun.69
WOS692
16 Doc 92
_ 29 "Jun"-99
29Jun:§9
' M Jun 99
I6.Jun89
29 Jun 99
38 JuriH
- M Jun M
29 Jun 99
1
i
i
_
i
f"
f ""
....
i " .
i
i
i
r
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
r '
i
i"
r
"
—
-------
Facility il Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants PotientiaUy Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS Quanliy
Slali Pipe* Code Pacametei Name UTS Name Avg
IWV1
inwr
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi'
"WVI
wvr
WV1
WVI
wvT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvr
wvT
WVI
WvT
wvT
WVI
^vT"
WVI
*vT
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wvi
WVI
WVI
wVi
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
042
013"
041
041
041
040
04T
032"
039
032
032
515
032
033
032
033
03J"
oir
Oil
031
03i
5JT
031
03T
035^
039
039
034
034
033
034
044
034
034.
034
033
033
033
033
033
034
054
099
00680
00400
90050
00660
00400
90090
00400
00340
00630 .
50090
00680
00630
00996
00340
00400
00400
00310
90090
00680
00630
00556
66530
00400
00930
00530
00400
00340
00310
50050
00680
00310
00596
0040Q
00400
00340
00310
90090
006*0
00630
00996
00930
ootto
50050
POMP
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
PH
PLOW. IN CONDUIT Oft THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
NITRITE PLUS NfTlUTE TOTAL 1 DET (ASN)
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
Oi. * GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
PH
BOO. 5-OAY (20 DEC C)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
NnUflb PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OIL & GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. T6TAL SUSPENDED
PH .
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOO. 9-OAY (20 DEG C)
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU. TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
BOD.MMY(20DEG C)
OIL * GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
PH
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. S-OAY (20 DEG C)
FLOW, M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
MTRm- PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
ON. I GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS, IUIAL SUSPENDED
NITMIIt PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
••-
.
Quanlily
Max
t
'
....:. . .
- • - •
Cone
Mm
-
......
Cone Cone Cone Quantity Monrtoi
Avg Max Urals Urals End Date Only
MGA.
so
user "
UG/L
SU
oar
SU
MGA.
UGA.
BCD "
MGA.
MGA.
MGA: "-
MGA.
SU
SO
MGA.
MGD
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA.
MGA.
SU
MGA. "'
MOL '
MGb
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
SU
SU
MGA.
MGA.
MGD
UGA.
MGA.
MGA.
UGA.
UGA.
MGD
MGA.
... ...
-
-
• 29 -Jun-99
29-Jun-M
"29- Jun-99
— 2FXK39
29 Jun99
29 Juv99
29- Jun-99
16-OK-92
16-DK-B2
2B-Jun-B9
MJunM
29-Jun99
29- Jun-99
29- Jun-99
16 Dec 92
2B-Jun-99
~>SFJunW
29-Jun-B9
-»Ju£Sl
29- Jun-99
16 Dec 92
29- Jun-99
29Jun-9B
16-OK-92
29-Jun99
29 Jun-99
16 Dec 92
ie-Dw-92
29- Jun-99
29-Jun-M
29-Jun99
HJunM
16 OK 92
16-OK-92
1
r~
i "
1 "
1
f
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 "
r
i
i
V"
r
i
r
i
i
i
k "
_...•..
r
!
i
i
1
1
i
1 —
1
1
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potienlially Addressed under NPOES Permit
Slat*
WV1
WvT
WV1
WvT
WV1
WV1
WvT
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WvT
WV1
(NV1
wvi
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WvT
wwl
WVf
WV1
WvT
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
wvi
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
Wvi
WV1
WV1
WV1
WV1
PCS
Pipe* Code
053
K5~
055
055
653
055
6*531
054
054
054
054
054
054
043
055
057
058
056
057
057
057
056
057
056
056
056
056
056
056
056
056
057
046
054
048
048
048
046
649
646
049
046
046
046
50050
05558
00530
00400
00660
00310
50550
00680
60630
00530
00400
00340 •
00680
00340
60310
00340
00310
00630
00556
00530
00630
00340
00310
50050
00680
00630
00556
60530
6*0400
00340
00400
QPfHO
00310
00680
00400
50050
00680
00400
66484
00680
00400
00340
00310
Paiametef Name
FLOW.TN coNDuiToR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
SoliDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED " "
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEO C)
ft.OW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
nlTRitc PLUS NfTRATc lolAL • DET (AS N)
Ok i GREASE FREON fexTH-GRAV METr)
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEU (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEU (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOO. 5-OAY (20 DEG C)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG C)
(•TRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OU.I GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COO)
BOD. 5-DAY (20 DEG C)
A.OW. IN CONbOrTOft THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. YOT ORGANIC (TOC)
NifRIIL H.U5 Nllruut iQTAl! 1 DET (AS N)
OH. 6, GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV METH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEM (HIGH LEVEL) (COD)
PH
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG C)
CARBON", V4II ORGANIC (IOC)
PH
HOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOTORGAMC (TOC)
PH
OH. 1 GREASE FREON EXTR-GRAV UETH
CARBON, IUI ORQAMC (TOC)
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND. CHEU (HIGH LEVEL) (COO) .
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG C)
Quanliy Quantity Cone Cone Cone Cone Quantity
UTS Name Avg Uax Mm Avg Max Units Urtfi End Date
"
-
•
- -'-•••-
• - —
.. .._ .
:;-L
--...
I :.
1 •
1
i • -
.. _..
....
—.
— -
....
.._.
-—
....
.....
MGD
MftL
UGA
SU
UGA.
UGA.
MGD
UGA.
UG/L
UGA.
UGA. ,
SU '
UG/L
UGA.
UGA.
UGA. ~
UGA.
UGA.
UGA.
UGA.
UGA.
UGA.
MG/C"
UGA.
UGD
MCA.
UGA:
UGA.
UGA.
SU
UGA.
SU
UGA.
UGA.
UGA.
SU
UGD
UGA.
SU
UGA.
UGA.
SU
UGA.
UGA: -.
-• - - •
. .
-
•"
*
'" ' " '~
16 Dec 92
29 Jun'9i
"29.jun9i
16-DK-9:
29.Jun.ft
16 Dec 8
16 Dec B2
29-Jun-9)
29.Jun-§i
» Jun-K
29Jun9!
29 Jun«
KJunU
29Jun99
~29Jun§9
"29 Jundi
29 Jun99
29Jun99
29'Jun-vi
t6*Ovc-92
16 Dec 92
29.jup.99
29Jun99
'M.Jun-M
26 Junft9
29-Jun-99
29.Jun.99
-^«S
njTtocfij
29 Junto
-»S«
» Junto
~X-Jun-M
Morutu
Only
r
1
i
i
r
r
r~
i"" .
.....
V
f
1
f "
i'
i
i
i "
i"
i
r
r ""
... .. ^
<""
\ "~
...
... .
r
; •-•
—
—
-------
Facility f 1 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPOES Permit
SIM*
wvi
WVI
WVI
WVI
'WVI
WVI
WVI
WVI
wW
WVT
WVI
WV1
wvi
wvi"
WVI
wvi
wvT
WVI
WVI
wvT
WVI
WVI
j^Wi
Pipe*
045
045
045
044
046
090
053
053
653
053
051
046
051
044
050
650
050
090
656
650
056
049
651
PCS
Cod*
50050
00880
00400
50050
00630
90050
00400
90050
OOttO
00400
56650
90050
00400
00660
00680
OQHB~
00556
00930
00400
00340
00310
50090
00660
PwamMei Name
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC fTOC)
PH
FLOW, IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (AS N)
FLOW. (NCONDUTT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (KJCJ
PH
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW. IN CONOUT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
PH
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOO)
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC (TOC)
NITRITE PLUS NITRATE TOTAL 1 DET (As N)
OIL I GREASE FRE6N EXTR-GRAv METH
SOLOS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
OXYGEN DEMAND CHEM (RJGH LEVEL) (COD)
BOD. 5-DAY (30 DEC C)
FLOW7 IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT ORGANIC fTOC)
UTS Name
•
.
'
Quart ry
' ~ .
.
.
•
Quanldy
Max
.....
r '
i"
....
• "
. .
Cone
Mm
...
Cone
Avg
Cone
Max
Cone
Unds
MGD
MM
SU
MGD
MGA.
MGD
SU
MGD *
MGA.
SU
MGO
MGD
su~ '" —
MGA.
MGA.
MGA.
MGA
MGA.
SU
HGA.
MGA.
MGD
BQA7 —
Quantity
Unit*
End Date
16 Dec 92
iSDecm
16-Dec-92
16-OK-92
MJunW
16-DK-92
18 Dec 92
16D*cd2
18 Dec 92
16-O*c-92
29-Jun-M
29-Jun-99
34-Jun-M
18 Dec 92
16Dec-92
29 Jun99
39-Jun99
29 Jun99
29 Jun99
29-Jun-99
29-Jun99
29Jun99
39Jun99
Moniloi
Cnity
1
i
1
i'
i
r
i
i
f
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
i
...
i
i
1
-------
Facility *2 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
Slate Pipe! Coda Paiamatai Nama
fS
SC^
SC"
sc-
fsc~
sc
SC
sc-
SC
sc
sc
001
001
601
sc
eoT" SW7V
Ool~ S73K~tPHEROLiCS~
801 (32730
GOT
sir
SZT
fce-
sc
sc
se-
sc
sc
5C~
sc
sc
sc
sc
sc
se-
sc
isr
sc
OuT
60t~bld9T
OoT~ 59175-
i»r"3eisr
001
oor
off
OOT
BTf~ 3469T
OOT
oor
001
001
DOT
oo
01087
001
OOT
our
aoT
001
odl
001
001
OOT
001
001
001
OA1
DOT
DOT
001
OOT
001
01092
vwYicHLoraor
TOLOEN¥
5075 TETRACRLORISETHY
S4W
PYftENE
PHENOUCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
JWoT
32730
PHEHANl
WtfTRlSPHEHH. '
PHENOUCs". TOTAL RECOVERABLE
34M1
TOTAL RECOVERABLE
' J4«TROWEROT
32730
3453T
34447
1.2-CMCHtOROKNZENE
" Hg^JcrrgTJTIgcWgRABLE
MTROBENZliC
34423
vstr
32730
SOST
39702
30700
S4HT
34371
34371
3O4T
30110
00720
00720
34320
OlSST
3J4TT
32101
TOIT
34301
2iNC TOTAL (AS Zlft
UTS Nama
Zinc" "
Zinc
Vinyl chtooda
TflchlofoathyUno
'Talcachiofoalhylana'
• IKJ^Z
NICKEL. TOTAL (ASM)
NAPHTHALENE
DlCTlQROMETRAC
1.3^JtCHLOROBEIgENE ~
PHEMbUCS.TOtALRECOVERlvJLE
o^di4of-
RJUOb»Maiia~
NScfiJT
Maphthaton*
HSBiytea^loTidr
HCXACHLOROETHANE
riEXACHjOROBUTAOENC
BHC
PLDORTNT
FlUORANTHENE
. NZENE
Bi«TrWLPHTHAtATE-
PM4-BUTYIPHTHALATE
cTATjpiTrowrpgcNr
CYANIDE. TOTAL (AS CN)
CHRYSENE
TOROMJUU. TOTAL (AS CR)
MTTRW
^HLOROFORH
CHLWOETTWiTToTArWEeHr
CHLOROBENZENE
Kma
Phanantluana
p-Hjuopnaool
4)Hrophanoi
p-Dlchlorobanzana
p-daaoT
SmSjKMJA'
o-Nibopriaaol'
o-Dichlorabaniana
m-Oichloro6anfaoa
m-Craaol
Haiachioiroalhana~
Quanfiy Quantity Cone Cone Cone Cone. Quantity
Ma. Units
Hr*nrHmiTt*irti "liana
HaxacMofobaiuana
EBijiba^aiU •""
Oimalnylpnlhalala
DMhytphthaiala
>n-butyl phthalala
C^aTiaiirffoW~~
JCyanMaa (Amanabla)'
Ihryiaoa
Mromium (TotaQ'
"" MomamanaMiKr
Chloroform
tone
. _._
..
— — — -—
"chloSd.
38
263
26
• "as;
065
055
._?•*
(431
~fi.S
n
T1,
103
"71
1.9T
"TJ
06t
~2^
- b"55
1.01
0\7i
6S
«1
OSS
o'il
044
2~.64
- 646
~W»
055
33
o:s3
2.82
031
"66
4.38
"S7S
~136
136
'201
141
169
JOB
~31;
~108
07
•~"TO.I
1^74
' IfiB
41
108
' 5.:
~~i:49
" J 24
"111
"108
-~T36
ITS
1.49
171
272
1.16
Sll
_ *•**.
— 1S:9
"T49
54
~"478
'" 1.18
•75
07
....
—
-
:_•
—
— -
"
i • •
i
.
.._
...
—
—
/
....
...
2
(
1
(
'"(
«
f
~\
~~i
3
'
11
2f
n
j
H
4
2<
1
Munitoi
End Data Only
-------
Facility #2 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
Slat*
(5C~
SC "
SC "
sc™
PCS
Pip* f Cod*
BOT
OOT
001
sc
001
sc
SC'
SC
001
001
001
sc
sc
SC"
sc~
SC'
SC"
001
oor
001
DOT
DOT
001
sc
sc
001
DOT
SC^
SC'
scr
sc~
sc~
oor
ODT
BOT
001
DOT
001
OOT
ODT
SC
SC"
SC"
SC"
SC
sc
SC"
sc
SC"
SC"
SC"
SB""
SC~
SC"
001
OOT
001
ODT
001
001
OOT
DDT
OOT
ow
ODT
DOT
ODT
SC^
SC"
SC"
ODT
oor
BBT
32102
B73TT
0100
34242
79631
34247
34030
34626
32730
01002
34220
342TT
34200
34206
32730
32730
32730
34BT
34611
32730
34616
34541
32103
34S61
WIT
74066
60060
00940
00324
ovmr
PwanwiMNam*
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
UTS Name
PHEMOUCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLT
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
BENZOQQFLUORANTHENE
3.4-aENZOFlUORANTHENE
BENZO(A)PVRENE .
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENB
PHENOUCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
ARSENIC^JOTAL (AS AS)
ANTHRACENE
AcwioNnwLr
ACENAPHTHVLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENOUCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
PHENOUCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
Tfaaeimcpveaor
PHENOUCS. TOTAL RECOVERABLE
2.MW6TROTOLUENE
2.4-OfiTROTOLUENE
PHENOUCS. TOTAL REC6V6RSBLC
U-OKHLOROPROPANE
T!
1.2.4-TRCHLOROBENZENE
VMVUDENE CHLORDE (1.1-OICHLOROETHENE)
1.1
jjfnsausasenvar
COUFORM. FECAL GENERAL _
FLOW, tl CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT"
CARBON. TOT OROAMC (TOC)
SOUDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
OXYOEN DEMAND. CHEM-ffaOH LEVEL) (COOl
BOD. 2OOAY (20 DEO. C)
•OD.^QAY(»DEi'rcr
Caifaoluian'piUnol
b«(2-Elhy*«y() ptahaUtT
Quanuy Quantity Cone.
Avg Max Mn
bphMMl
ArMnk
Anyfanilrll*
2-»>c-BuM-«Toph^K)IA')ino»^
2-CMoraphMoi
2-4-DbTMttiy) Pranol
Z^DIriMlnvl P»
2.4-OMtio4oluWM
2.4-OMIcoptMnal
2.4-DMIraplMnal
1,2-Ofchlofopro|Mn«
1.1-OichlonMlhylM*
i:n
1,1,2-TncMonMNwra
045
"K58
"OB
2*i
TT55
SSS
—7T
~TSJ
7T
1T7J
045
098
385
1.71
171
"OT
O.S5
0.53
5S»
668
•"TWT
13655
1120
096
108
7321
T49
~T54
154
"US
T?
Hff
"6 SB
~Wt
~!06-"
217 —
181
"y«t—718
-~T2
2J2
~5!79
"531
352
~06T
~09
1.36
6350
1260
"4600
1 11
T046S
3060
Cone Cone. Cone.
Avg Max Units
UGX
50
38
03
278
59TOM~
OGAT
81 oat
136 UGAT"
~59UGA."
01
100
59
242
759
"OT
277
TT3
~
-------
Facility 02 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potientially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
Slal* Pip* • Cod*
5C"
5C
sc
SC |00l
5C-
se IBM
tar
SC 1001
SJT
SC
8C"
OOT
BOT
On
an
«T
m
aa
002
BUT
00300
OTHT
00310
OOUT
01106
00530
soon
Paiaimter Nam*
OXYGEN.
UTS Name
Ok. i MEASE FREON EXTM^MV METH
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREAItXKT PLANT"
BOO. 5-OAY (20 DEO C)
CHLORME.
OXYGEN DB4AND. ULTMATE
ALI.MNUM. TOTAL (AS At)
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
FLOW. WCONDUT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
i. TOM
CARBON. TOT
Quanliy Quantity Cunc Cone. Cone. Cone
AVQ. Mu Mil Avy Max Units
Quantity
Units End Oat*
MonilM
41
5«56
94
"10900
1
10
OS
30
55
55
-------
Facility #3 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
Pip* • Cod* Pai am*ta< Nam*
UTS Name
Quanliy Quantity Cone
Avg. MM Mm
"
Cone.
Avg
Cone.
Cone
UniU
IMS/L
.Quantity.
Units
End Date
MonMof
Only
T
Z*c7T5TAr JAT2N)
ZINC, TOTAL (AS ZN)
VMYLCHLORDC
THHJ
6825
TTBTS
"OKll
HSSoT"
PR*n*nthV*n*
PHENOL. SlNOi£ COMPOUND
mENANTHRENE
INITROPHENOL'
"B 015
004T
B5771
34007
54W71
5J60T
1 ^-OICHLORODENZENE
MCKEL. TOTAL (AS M)
1.3-aCHLOROBENZENE
LEAD. TOTAL (AS PB)
O~M BIBS HOT
5WS7
SWOT
HEXACHLOROBUTADKNE
FLUORANTHENE
rmvi BENZENE
MQ/L
BM7THOT
Di-fl-bulylpMhah
DHMUTYL PHTHALATE
CYANDC. TOTAL (AS CN)
CYANPe. TOTAL (AS CN)
Chromium (ToUJ)
MtrHVLCHLOHlDE
"BIB
~T»1H6
~BT8I
CHUMOETHANE
CADUUM.TOTAl(ASC(H
HOC—ILBSD
•UTYl OENZYL PHTHALATE
•B 0-CM.OBOETHOXV) UETWJiE
-------
Facility *3 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
Slate PifMfCoo*
Paiametef Nam*
UTS Nam*
PA
PA
PA~
PX DO
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
wr
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA-
PA
W
nr
wr
PX"
PA-
ST
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
BT
PX~
PIT
PA
PX~
P7T
001
001
TO"
«-
001
001
01012
34242
TOS
3U47
34030
001
001
ODT
001
oo
00~1
001
ool
001
B8T
OOT
BOT
COT
001
001
OoT
DOT
ool
002
ool
001
ool
001
001
DOT
DOT
001
BOT
D6T
34SM
34215
34200
34205
5WT
5454i
32103
34S5T
345TT
31SOT
00319
01BB"
01042
01033
01032
00340
00310
DDDOT"
10300
OBinr
71PT
KNZO(A)PYRENE
BENZENE _"_'._.
BENZO(A)ANTHRACCNE
b*nzo(b)Auonin&Mn*
ANTHRACENE
XERYtonrRTLT
ACENAPHTHYIENE
ACENAPHTHENE
4.UNTRO4VCftE8oL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2.4-OlCHLOROPHENOL
1.2-OFHENYLHYDRXSNE~
1.2-OCHLOROPROPANE
1J-OICHLOROETHANE
1.).4.TMcHLoftoBEN2ENE
VMYUOENE CHLORDE (11-OtCHLORC€THEN£)
IT-OtCHLOROETHANC
1.1.2-TRlcHLOft6ETUAN^
Tl.l.TWcHLoROETMANE
SOLUS. TOTAL DISSOLVED
BOD (ULT ALL STAGES)
COLOR (PT-co UNITS)
KPN. TOTAL (ASTET
COPPCR. TOTAL (AS CU) "
SOUDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
CHROMUM. TRVALENT (ATCR)'
CHROMUM. HEXAVALENT (AS CR)
Ljieobr
BOD. 5-OAY (20 DEG7CJ
OXYoEM.tt5SaWDU»r
("FAHRENHEIT
SODS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
T4MEN. AMMONKToTATiAS N)
NffRoQEM. AMMONIA TOTAL (AgNTfif
Quanliy Quantity Cone Cone Cone Cone. Quantity Monitoi
Avg Mai. Mm Avg Mat Units Unit* End Data Only
BMIMM
ActytonHril*
2-4-Olm«hy
i*n*
M
Kan*
liam
..
.
01
—116
5
— TS
047
62
-.
- --'••
5168
412
— »:i
— f78
2.1
693
-
—
_.
—
609
0022
6623
0023
6637
6622
' 6622
6696
6022
' 6622
6676
1 6031
6618
6255
6113
! 0071
0639
--••
6
S
0153
' 6068
1 6666
1 6016
6022
6621
0021
2
12*
""0.5"
643
45
57
20
018
0059
6 Mi
6661
" 0 136
0«9
6059
62lf
sm
6J77
"50M
6106
661T
6185
bili
6.112
623
6211
6!14
6625
66SS
6651
0664
"875
4
T.5U
1
6.68
""120
"" 183
•"40
MGiC" •
Mac "
MG/C
Mac —
Mac —
«ar
uac —
Mac*
war- -
aac —
Mac-
Mac"
aar —
aac
ear--
MGA.
aac
Mo/C
tia£~
Mar
PT5CO
*sc —
Mar •
use —
Mac "
ust —
titan.
SU
am
DEO.F
MGA.
Mai
aac —
CBS/b
...... .
—
LBSVD
LBS/D'
LBS7B*
LBS70
LBS7&
1XSB'
34607
S4607
34607
34607
"14607
' 54807
54807
31867
"""31807
34807
34607
34607
"54687
34807
^^34607
34607
32761
4W£j|i
" "3460>
"31887
31807
31807
' "3*87
31887
34807
29676
"34807
29676
32761
. 34607
29876
"31807
31807
M678
3276T
"31687
34807
TOT*
Q—
6
fi-
0
o —
o —
0
B'--
or
or
o~
o-
6
fi •--
o ---
T- '
0
0
0"
a
«•
a
»
ar_;_
r "
b~ -
i -
0
0"
0
0
1
o —
-------
Facility §3 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
Quantiy Quantity Cone. Cone.
Avg. Max. Min Avg.
Cone.
Max.
Cone.
Unilt
Moniloi
Or
10~
QuanUy
Unite End Dal*
BOO. PERCENT REMOVALrTOTAG
FLOW. IN CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLAN
MUM. TOTAL BB3olV*D- IM DEOX
ALUMNUM. TOTAL (AS At.)
__
now. M coNourr OR THRU TREATMENTTSIANT
-------
Facility *4 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
Slate Pip* • Cod*
Quantity Cone. Cone Cone
Mm Avg Man
3:4
SM
068
Cone.
Quantity
Unit! End Data
Monilot
Only
-------
Facility *4 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
Quanliy Quantity Cone. Cone. Cone. Cone
Mn. Avg Max. Units
Quantity
End Dal*
Moniloi
Only
PvanMlw Nanw
UTSName
TAc«oaphT(v»n«
4£-Dinilro-o-cf Md
RRofophmol
ACCNAPHTHENE
LiWCTHVLHCNQC
Z-4-DnMlhyl phenol
2.4-OMtoololuMM
nPDNTROPHENK
Z.4-OMIioptMnol
1.4-aCHLOKOPHENCX
2.4-OtcNoroplMnol
U-OICH.OROPROPANE
1.2-Oichk>ioprop*ni
1.2-Oichloio^han*
14.4-TWCHLOROHMZDC
1.1.1 •TndilofOHMIM
PLUS MTRATC TOTAL 1 DtT. (AS N)
OXYOEN OBMND. CHEM. (HKJH dVEL) (CQDf
BOO. 5-OAY (20 DEO
. TOTAL KEHDUM.
PUOW. M CONtMT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
ALUMMUM. TOTAL (AS AL)
OL A OREABE FREON EXTR-ORAvMETH
FLOW. MOONDUn'OR THRU TREATMlNTPLANT
CARBON. TOT OROAMC (TOO
__
FLOW. N CONDUIT OR THRU TREAliKNT PLANT
CARBON. TOT OROAMC fTOCI
CHLORME. TOTAL RESDUAL
BOD. MMV (20 DEO. C)
Flow. N«JNDUTT OR THRU TREATMENT PLAMI
-------
Facility #4 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
Slat*
PCS
PipMCode PannMlwNanM
UTSNamo
021
020
WVZ
WVT
| WVZ
mm
on
WVJ
001
015
BBT
DOT
BBT
wvz
wvz
mvf
I WOT
|001
BIT
mr
IWV2
Iwvrlnr
IBTT
017
TOTT
wvz
WV2
013
wvz
017
wvz
oil
wvz
019
MAA
Oil
wvz
013
013
wvz
013
revvr
wvr
mo
on~
[WVT
[WVT
fi£
ton"
Er
wvz
00400
sooso
UOD10
50090
90090
OOHO
00629
90000
HOMO
00010
BfififlT
t^gnjjf~'
00929
miff
0053
00400
sooso
OOHO
DOOM
ODMO
00400
00010
qoflfft
90000
aagg
Q08Z5
34S6F
PH
Quanliy Quantity Cone Cone Cone Cone
Avg. Max Mm Avg MM.
TBt^TUM.\n«TER^Ea:clNTIQftADE'
FLOW. M CONDUTTOR THRU TREATMEWTPLANT"
«BT«IWOE
tytHAIUKK. WAICM
FLOW. MCONDUTT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
?'f"&jglie'"~
FLOW.MCONDUrT OR THRO TREATMENT FLAW |
CHLOfflfcE. TOTAL RE8OUAL
CARBON. TOT OROAMC (TOC)
NIKnC «XW MTNAIE TOTAL 1 Dt I. (AS N)
NmWOEN. KJELDAHL TOTAL (ASHj
CHLORME. TOTAL RESDUAl*
OJ^N DEMAMXCWtOJ^ I^VEUJC^)
CARBON. TOT OROAMC fTOCf
TBWPEfWTURE. WAltRWOiCENTlGHADE "
i»N)
NIIROQEN. AMMONIA TOTATjATN)
SdQS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
PH
CARBON. TOT OROANiCI (TOCT~
TOTAL RESCUAI
CARBON. TOT OROAMCTnK)"
PH
CARBON. TOT OROAMC (TOC)
FLOW. M CONDUTT OR THRU TREATMCHTPlANT"
CARBON. TOT OROAMC (TOO)
PH
TB«RATU^WKTERlgO.'CENTlGRADE~'
CHLORME. TOTAL RESORT
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREAtly£NTPU(NT"
SOLIDS. TOTAL SUSPENDED
HfflBTfl.T"T^I yyFHnFP
CARBON. TOT OROAMC (TOCT
MTROOEN. KJEUMHL TOTAL (AS N)
CARBON. TOT
CHLORDE(AS~C1T
OROANlClTOCT
1.yOKHLOROPROPENE. TOTATWEIGRt"
—746
~6S7|
1Z751
~40d6
0.37
5174
"1971
1547
6000
0.59
~43
«7
,
'43
"62
0:2
43
12
~M
02
43
'«
'ft
Unit*
so
DEGC"-
IMO~D—
DEG~C~~
MQO
Quantity
Units End Dale.
rso—
DE&C
Hsar~
MOA.
M6A7~"
MOAT
MSA7~
HOC
\USK.—
50
M6/C—
'MOTIT-
[DtfiC"
MOAT—
Dirrc"
MOT~"
flfiAT-
MOA.
su
HSAT~
MOT"
HOT""
STJ—
MOJL—
HOD—
HOT-
SO—
DE6C
MSO
MOT--
MOT-~
MOT
MOAT
MGA.
U07L •"••
LBS/D
LBS/D"
LlSAT
CBS7D"
LBSA)
CBS7D"
[BSfi~
L1SAT
Monilot
Only
17-Moy-M
23-Fab-OS
IJTiFBi
J3F.4TH
i7«E^97
23-Fab-M
23-F«b-90
73-Feb-M
J5T«t9l
"iss+ms—
"23.Sep4AO
"Ji-Feb-fti F"
~55Teti¥0~
~1T4SFHB""
23-F«b-U
~23TiF»
ZJTiBW
1
T"
Id"
-------
Facility *4 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
SUM
Quanliy Quanlity Cone. Cone
Avg Ma». Min A»g
PlfMfCod*
5HSBJT IFroWTN C3HMJIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLAN1
BTB*SSAY(4aHR)
PiSRCENT
«CUTE-TO"Xe
ACUTET6XC
BOO. S-OAY (20 DEO.
T OR T*fBJ TREATMENT PlJWT
(MQHIEVEL)(COO)
Oft. A'OREASE FREOM EXTR-ORW BETH
50UDS. TOTAT8USKNOEO
BOD. S-OAT (2U DEO C)
NrnUTEPlUSMTHATE
OM. A GREASE FREoNEXTW-ORAVMETfl—
CARBON. TUT OHOAMC (TOG)
WTROOEN. KJEUMHL TOTAL (AS N)
-------
Facility *4 Permit Conditions and UTS Contaminants Potentially Addressed under NPDES Permit
PCS
SlaU PifMlCod*
UTS Name
WVJ
ww
WVJ
WW
WV2
wr
OSS
00010 TEMPERATDHt. WATER DM.
00310
CARBON. TOT ORGANkf
SOUDS. TOTAL!
TOCT
C)
^^.jNC°Np^^T'yTKEATIyCNT PLANT'
CARBON. TOT OHOANCffOC) '
CHLORME. TOTAL KESDUAL
FLOW. M CONDUIT OR THRU TREATMENT PLANT
CARBON. TOT i
Quanliy Quantity Cone. Cone. Cone. Ctioc
Avg Max Min. Avg. Mai. Unit*
806
"Ml
1606
2500
Quantity
Unit* End Date
|.- —
43
~S
MO/T -
MiSC—
DBT.
-------
ATTACHMENT F-6
INTERVIEWS WITH COGNIZANT STATE PERMITTING OFFICIALS:
TELEPHONE LOGS
-------
Telephone Log
Prepared by: Christopher L. French Date: October 30, 1995
Made Call to: Russ Sherer
Director of NPDES Office
State of South Carolina
Date: October 5, 1995
Summary of Discussion: I initiated the discussion with Mr. Sherer by describing the major tenets
of the Phase m proposed rule and their potential impact on the NPDES permitting process. Mr.
Sherer suggested I contact Mr. Marion Sadler, a permit writer in his office who would be better
able to answer specific questions; however, Mr. Sherer did volunteer his opinion as to the
potential impact of the proposed rule's language. Mr. Sherer stated that there would be a
significant adverse impact on the State's permitting process as a result of possible permit
modification applications. Mr. Sherer stated that South Carolina was currently in its 3rd year of a
5-year water shed-based permitting review program. Basically, the program staggers the review
of all of the State's NPDES permits over 5-years. Each year, the permitting office reviews and
reissues all permits that discharge to one of five water sheds in the State. In this manner, the
impact of numerous facilities on a single body of water can be balanced and better evaluated. Mr.
Sherer stated that a potential influx of requests for permit modifications resulting from the Phase
III deferral would adversely impact the States basin approach. Once a permit modification
request was filed, an time frame for responding would be initiated, and therefore, throw off the 5-
year staggered approach that is currently employed.
-------
Telephone Log
Prepared by: Christopher L. French Date: October 30, 1995
Made Call to: Russ Sherer
Director of NPDES Office
State of South Carolina
Date: October 5, 1995
Summary of Discussion: I initiated the discussion with Mr. Sherer by describing the major tenets
of the Phase HI proposed rule and their potential impact on the NPDES permitting process. Mr.
Sherer suggested I contact Mr. Marion Sadler, a permit writer in his office who would be better
able to answer specific questions; however, Mr. Sherer did volunteer his opinion as to the
potential impact of the proposed rule's language. Mr. Sherer stated that there would be a
significant adverse impact on the State's permitting process as a result of possible permit
modification applications. Mr. Sherer stated that South Carolina was currently in its 3rd year of a
5-year water shed-based permitting review program. Basically, the program staggers the review
of all of the State's NPDES permits over 5-years. Each year, the permitting office reviews and
reissues all permits that discharge to one of five water sheds in the State. In this manner, the
impact of numerous facilities on a single body of water can be balanced and better evaluated. Mr.
Sherer stated that a potential influx of requests for permit modifications resulting from the Phase
III deferral would adversely impact the States basin approach. Once a permit modification
request was filed, an time frame for responding would be initiated, and therefore, throw off the 5-
year staggered approach that is currently employed.
-------
Telephone Log
Prepared by: Christopher L. French Date: October 30, 1995
Made Call to: Mr. Dave Montali
Head, Pretreatment Section for the State of West Virginia
(304)-558-4086
Date: October 11, 1995
Summary of Discussion: After a brief discussion with Mr. Montali regarding the Phase in
proposed rule, I was referred to Mr. Randy Sovick, of the Industrial Waste Section. I was
unaware that Mr. Montali was not involved in the preparation of NPDES permits, but rather
permits for indirect dischargers.
6-3
-------
Telephone Log
Prepared by: Christopher L. French Date: October 30, 1995
Made Call to: Mr. Randy Sovick
Head, Industrial Waste Section
Office of Water Resources
State of West Virginia
(304)558-8856
Date: October 23, 1995
Summary of Discussion: I initiated the discussion with an explanation of the basic tenets of the
Phase in proposed rule, and their potential impacts on the NPDES permitting program. Mr.
Sovick's general reaction was unfavorable. Mr. Sovick expressed the concern that under current
conditions, the State is under a considerable burden to reissue permits and is under-staffed.
Additional permit modification applications would only result in his office falling further behind.
Mr. Sovick provided valuable insight to the State of West Virginia's permit modification process.
Permit modifications are first classified as "major" or "minor". Mr. Sovick stated that in the case
of a modification requesting the addition of constituents to a permit, the modification would be
classified as a "major modification". For major modifications the following administrative time
line and steps are followed:
1) A modification application is filled out by the facility. In West Virginia, this
application is identical to the original permit application, however, only the
information required for the modification is provided. A fee is also paid.
2) The State has 90 days to review the permit, and an additional 90 days to determine
whether or not to issue the modification.
3) The State then has two options: 1) to deny the permit modification or 2) to issue the
permit modifications (with conditions if so desired).
4) For the issuance of major modifications, a public notice is posted of the proposed
modification and a 30 day comment period is allowed
5) .After the comment period, the final decision to issue or deny is made (a public
hearing may also be called).
6) After the final decision, a 30 day appeal period is allowed for all interested parties.
Mr. Sovick commented that although major modifications are reviewed first, there currently is a
considerable back-log in the permit review process and it is unlikely that the time line above
would be kept. Currently, prior to the addition of modifications that might result from the Phase
in "deferral", the State cannot meet its 90 day requirement. Additional modifications could take
in excess of a year to review and make a decision.
-------
Mr. Sovick also commented that there are numerous parameters considered in the permitting
process that are not reflected in the final permit: not all parameters considered are necessarily
added to the permit. As a result, Mr. Sovick thought that it would be unlikely that there would be
underlying hazardous constituents that had not at least been considered during the permitting
process. An exception, Mr. Sovick noted, would be in the case where the facility is attempting to
add constituents from waste streams that had not previously been managed in the wastewater
treatment system.
------- |