Federal
Financial Assistance for
Pollution Prevention
and Control
-------
Disclaimer
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency has made no
attempt to verify the correctness
of the following and does not
endorse any specific method of
pollution control financing or
any underwriting firm. The
material is being presented as
an information service in order
to provide as complete coverage
on this subject as possible.
Prepared by the Environmental
Protection Agency and the
Council on Environmental Quality
under the auspices of the Inter-
agency Task Force on Improving
Assistance Programs to mitigate
Economic Impacts of Environ-
mental Programs
-------
Federal
Financial Assistance for
Pollution Prevention
and Control
Contents
3 Introduction
5 Assistance for Industry
5 Small Business Loans
5 Guaranteed Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
6 Economic Development Loans
7 Rural Industrialization Assistance
7 Industrial Development Grants
8 Innovative Treatment System Grants
9 Industrial Development Bonds
9 Federal Tax Incentives
10 Technical Assistance Grants
10 Threatened Plant Studies
1 1 Publicly Owned Treatment Systems
1 3 Assistance for Communities
1 3 Coastal Energy Impact Program
1 3 Urban Development Action Grant Program
1 4 Economic Development Grants
1 4 Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants
1 5 Construction Grants for Municipalities
1 7 Assistance for Agriculture
1 7 Agricultural Conservation Program
1 7 Farm Ownership and Operating Loans
1 8 Soil and Water Conservation
1 9 Rural Clean Water Program
1 9 Rural Abandoned Mine Program
21 State Programs
22 State Agencies
26 Federal Agency Offices
-------
Introduction
Federal and other pollution con-
trol programs have been as-
signed to protect the environ-
ment without causing undue
harm to the economy. No Fed-
eral regulation or guideline is
issued until after its potential
cost to the discharger has been
assessed and deemed reason-
able.
Pollution control measures can
be costly, especially to smaller
firms that cannot take advantage
of the economies of scale en-
joyed by large firms. Because of
their lack of capital or low profit
margins, they face the prospect
of shutting down. Even some
communities find themselves
threatened with economic
disruption either because of the
possible loss of businesses or
through their own need to make
pollution control expenditures.
The U.S. government con-
siders it a matter of serious con-
cern that even a small number of
firms may be forced to close
because of their financial inability
to comply with environmental
laws. The Environmental Protec-
tion Agency keeps careful track
of these potential closings and
attempts to help otherwise viable
concerns remain in business.
Much of this assistance is pro-
vided by informing affected par-
ties of the Federal and other
assistance programs available to
them. This booklet describes
these programs and is intended
to be useful to affected firms,
farms, trade associations,
unions, non-profit development
organizations, and State and
local governments seeking to
reduce the sometimes disruptive
effect of environmental regula-
tions on individual firms and
local economies.
In many cases it will be appro-
priate to use a combination of
the assistance programs de-
scribed in this booklet. A fully
developed assistance strategy
can range from direct loans to a
distressed firm, to a variety of
grants, loans, and manpower
training programs to redevelop a
local economy hurt by a major
plant closing. This brochure at-
tempts to describe the individual
programs which can comprise an
assistance strategy, but in some
cases creative packaging of the
programs can bring the best
results. To assist firms, workers,
and communities in meeting
pollution control requirements
without undue loss of employ-
ment, a regional financial
assistance officer has been des-
ignated in each EPA regional
office. These officers will help
ensure that eligible business and
communities receive the financial
and technical assistance available
under the programs described in
the succeeding chapters.
Most of these programs are
aimed at assisting private firms,
particularly small businesses. By
keeping these firms alive, the
adverse impact of environmental
programs upon communities and
workers can be minimized.
Various government loans, in-
terest subsidies and tax breaks
have been devised to help
marginal firms secure pollution
control equipment at favorable
rates. A limited amount of
technical assistance also is
available to them.
Similar programs are available
to farmers who must finance the
cost of reducing run-offs from
their fields or other agricultural
operations.
Communities also are eligible
to receive grants and technical
assistance for projects aimed at
improving the environment or
reducing or avoiding the adverse
impacts environmental regula-
tions might have upon the local
economy. The grants can be
used for constructing en-
vironmental facilities or carrying
out economic development
plans.
The various programs have
been grouped into three sections
in this booklet — those intended
for industry, for communities,
and for farms. However, pro-
grams listed for one group often
can provide assistance to mem-
bers of the other groups. In ad-
dition to the Federal Programs,
many States also have made vari-
ous forms of assistance available.
These are indicated on a chart
showing what types of programs
are available in the different
States. At the end of the booklet
there is a list of the Federal and
State offices where further infor-
mation can be obtained.
The potential applicant should
keep the following facts in mind
when looking for help:
• Each program is designed to
deal with particular situations
and is limited in the types and
amount of assistance it can pro-
vide, and the types of clients it
can serve.
• These programs are designed
to help those firms that are at a
financial disadvantage in making
pollution control expenditures.
• The programs are intended to
help the firms that can be eco-
nomically viable if they are
helped.
EPA tries to identify busi-
nesses and plants that might be
adversely affected by environ-
mental regulations. Business
owners, workers or community
leaders should not hesitate to
bring their problems to the atten-
tion of the regional economic
financial adviser at the EPA of-
fice in his or her area to obtain
this valuable information.
-------
-------
Assistance for Industry
Small Business
Loans
Guaranteed
Pollution
Control
Revenue Bonds
Small Business
Administration
Small Business
Administration
The Small Business
Administration (SBA) is charged
under the Small Business Act
with aiding small businesses in
their financing needs. Section 8
of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act of 1972 amended
Section 7 of the Small Business
Act by authorizing loans to
small business concerns for
adding to or altering their
equipment, facilities, or
methods of operation in order to
comply with the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, now
called the Clean Water Act. The
loans are intended to assist
eligible businesses, farmers and
feedlot operators who might
otherwise incur substantial
economic injury. The
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) must certify that
the equipment being purchased
will be sufficient to bring the
firm in compliance with the
applicable environmental
regulations.
A small business may be
eligible for an SBA loan if its
need for the loan results from it
engaging in one of the following
activities and/or if any one of
the following conditions exists.
The business:
• Has an effluent discharge re-
quiring a Pollution Discharge
Elimination System permit under
Section 402 of the Clean Water
Act;
• Emits discharges through a
sewer line into a publicly owned
treatment works in a city or
town that requires the pretreat-
ment of waste discharge;
• Plans to discharge into a mu-
nicipal sewer system through the
construction of a lateral or inter-
ceptor sewer;
• Is subject to State or regional
requirements on controlling the
disposal of pollutants that may
affect groundwater;
• Requires a U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers permit for disposal
or dredged or fill material;
• Is subject to Coast Guard or
State government requirements
regarding the standard of perfor-
mance of marine sanitation de-
vices controlling sewage from
vessels;
• Is implementing a plan to con-
trol or prevent the discharge of
oil or other hazardous sub-
stances.
SBA also makes loans to firms
(and farmers) seeking to comply
with the Clean Air and Toxic
Substances Control Acts. These
direct loans can be made for up
to 30 years. Interest rates have
been running slightly higher than
7 percent.
Inquiries may be made at any
SBA or EPA office or by writing
the Financial Assistance Coordi-
nator, U. S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, WH-586, 401 M
Street, S. W., Washington,
D. C. 20460. EPA and SBA field
offices also are listed at the end
of this manual.
Queries about the Toxic Sub-
stances Control Act may be sent
to the Industry Assistance Office,
Office of Toxic Substances,
TS-799, 401 M Street, S. W.,
Washington, D. C. 20460. The
Industry Assistance Office also
provides a toll-free assistance
number. Telephone 800-424-9065.
In Washington, D. C., call
554-1404.
An amendment to the Small
Business Act and the Small
Business Investment Act (Public
Law 94-305) (90 Stat. 663)
authorizes SBA to guarantee
financing needed to acquire
facilities for controlling air,
noise or water
pollution contamination. SBA
may guarantee the full amount
of payments due under any
"qualified contract" let to
acquire, install, plan, design or
construct property the Agency
finds is likely to help prevent,
reduce, abate or control noise,
air water pollution or
contamination.
The statute specifically
provides that the financing of
the pollution control facilities
may be done through industrial
revenue bonds (IDB) issued by a
State or political subdivision.
Interest on these bonds is
exempt from federal income tax
under the Internal Revenue
Code and Treasury regulations.
The program is intended to
serve viable and sound
enterprises that do not have
ready access to long term
capital markets and are likely to
suffer a disadvantage in
competing with other business
concerns in the planning,
design or installing of pollution
control facilities.
A business applying for a
guarantee must:
• Be one that qualifies under
SBA industry size standards, or
is independently-owned and op-
erated, not dominant in its field,
has no more than $9 million in
assets, a net worth not exceed-
ing $4 million, and after-tax earn-
ings averaging no more than
$400,000 during the previous two
years.
-------
Assistance for Industry
Economic
Development
Loans
Economic Development
Administration
• Be at an operational or
financing disadvantage with
other business concerns with
respect to either the planning,
design or installation of.
pollution control facilities or the
obtaining of the financing
needed to do so.
• Have been in operation for a
least five years, and profitable
during any three of the last five
years preceding the date of the
application;
• Provide evidence (usually
from a pollution control
regulatory agency) on the need
for the facility, and its ability to
help prevent, reduce, abate, or
control pollution or
contamination.
Applications for a bond guar-
antee must be made on SBA
Form 1136. They can be filed at
SBA's Central Office, 1441 L
Street, N. W., Washington,
D. C. 20416 or at the nearest
SBA field office.
While the financing of
industrial revenue bonds is
normally done at the most
favorable repayment terms and
the lowest cost to the borrower,
there are instances where the
financial needs of a small busi-
ness concern are too small to
justify the costs associated with
IDB financing. Some States have
overcome this problem by issu-
ing a single IDB to cover the
pollution control financing needs
of a number of small businesses.
In those States which do not
have this program, financing
may be available through the
guaranteed and direct loans of
the Small Business Administra-
tion.
Inquiries should be directed to
any SBA office or to the Office
of Special Guarantees, U.S.
Small Business Administration,
1441 L Street, N. W., Washing-
ton, D. C. 20416. Telephone
(703) 235-2900.
Information on the program
also may be obtained by writing
the Council of Pollution Control
Financing Agencies, 10960 Wil-
shire Boulevard, Suite 1806, Los
Angeles, CA 90024 (213)
479-3895.
The Economic Development
Administration (EDA) of the U.
S. Department of Commerce is
charged with the responsibility
of stimulating industrial growth
and economic development in
economically depressed areas
of the country. EDA will make
development loans to firms in
an attempt to upgrade an area
economically by creating new
and permanent jobs and higher
incomes for local residents.
While pollution control is not
directly related to the EDA's
efforts to alleviate economic
distress and increase
employment, the business
development loan program can
indirectly help firms to install
pollution control equipment. For
example, a firm may qualify for
an EDA development loan, if it is
located in an area EDA has
designated as one of low growth
and the firm is likely to be shut
down—causing a loss of jobs—
for failure to comply with
environmental regulations.
The maturity of a loan is based
upon the useful life of the fixed
assets being acquired and may
be extended for up to 25 years.
Interest rates are determined by
the cost of borrowing by the
U. S. Government. They are
adjusted quarterly.
Loans and grants also may be
extended to a business under
Titles II and IX for the costs
incurred either to change pro-
duction processes or install
special pollution abatement
equipment.
The loans will be made only
when the funding is not available
from any other private or Federal
source.
Loan assistance (other than
working capital loans) shall not
exceed 65% of aggregate cost to
the applicant (excluding all
other Federal aid in connection
with the undertaking).
Guarantees can be extended
by EDA on loans or leases up to
90% of the potential liability.
Whenever pollution control is
involved under the title II loan or
guarantee program, or Title IX
grants, the applicant must
submit the notice from the
agency ordering the shut down
of the facility if compliance is
not achieved by a certain date.
The pollution control agency
also must certify in writing that
the proposed equipment to be
installed will satisfy its
requirements. Applications for
any new project exceeding $1
million must be accompanied by
a feasibility study prepared by
an independent consultant. The
applicant may prepare such a
study package when the cost of
the project is less than $1
million.
Inquiries may be directed to
the Office of Business Develop-
ment, Economic Development
Administration, U. S. Depart-
ment of Commerce, Washing-
ton, D. C. 20230, or the nearest
EDA regional office listed at the
end of this booklet.
-------
Assistance for Industry
Rural
Industrialization
Assistance
Industrial
Development
Grants
Farmers Home
Administration
Farmers Home
Administration
The Farmers Home Administra-
tion (FmHA) may make and in-
sure loans to either profit or non-
profit public, private, or coopera-
tive organizations, individuals,
and Indian tribes to improve,
develop, or finance business, in-
dustry and employment and
better the economic and environ-
mental climate of rural com-
munities. Such loans can be
made for pollution abatement
and control and guaranteed
when made, held or serviced by
other lenders. Indian tribes can
qualify for such loans when they
are federally recognized or oc-
cupy Federal or State reserva-
tions.
FmHA may also award grants,
not to exceed $50,000,000 an-
nually, to public bodies to help
develop private enterprises. The
funds can be used to develop,
construct, or acquire land,
buildings, plants, equipment, ac-
cess streets and roads, parking
areas, utility extensions,
necessary water supply and
waste disposal facilities. It also
can be used for refinancing or
the payment of services and
fees.
FmHA may participate in the
joint financing of private busi-
ness enterprises in rural areas
with the Economic Development
Administration, the Small Busi-
ness Administration, the Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban
Development, other Federal and
State agencies, and with private
and quasi-public financial institu-
tions. Eligible applicants can
receive either joint loans or
grants, whichever are applicable.
Loans also can be made to
eligible rural applicants for pollu-
tion abatement and control proj-
ects. FmHA also may make
grants of up to $25,000,000 an-
nually. No grant is to exceed 50
percent of a project's develop-
ment cost.
FmHA is prohibited from mak-
ing any loan which could cause
the total outstanding indebted-
ness of loans made under the
Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant
Act to exceed $50,000. Nor can
loans be used for purchasing or
leasing land other than as cash
rent, or the carrying on of any
land leasing or purchasing pro-
gram. Loans also must not ex-
ceed the amount certified by the
county committee.
FmHA also can make and in-
sure loans to associations, in-
cluding non-profit corporations,
eligible Indian tribes, and public
and quasi-public agencies for ap-
plying and establishing soil con-
servation measures, shifting land
use, and conserving, developing,
using and controlling water
resources. Loans also can be
made for installing or improving
drainage or waste disposal
facilities, and developing recrea-
tional and essential community
facilities, including the purchase
of necessary equipment. Finan-
cial and other aid also is available
for the planning of such proj-
ects. The projects must be aimed
at serving primarily farmers and
ranchers, their tenants and
laborers, and other rural
residents.
FmHA is also authorized to
make aggregate grants of up to
$300,000,000 in any fiscal year to
associations for financing
specific projects or works needed
to develop, store, treat, purify or
distribute water, or to collect,
treat, or dispose of waste in rural
areas. No grant may exceed 50
percent of development cost.
The association receiving the
grant also must insure that the
facility to be built will adequately
serve the reasonably foreseeable
growth needs of the area. No
grant is approved until FmHA
determines that the population
of the area will not decline below
that for which the project is
designed, and the project has
adequate capacity to serve both
the present population of the
area and its foreseeable future
growth. The project also must
be deemed necessary for orderly
community development consis-
tent with a comprehensive com-
munity water, waste disposal or
other development plan, and
must not conflict with any State
development plan.
-------
Assistance for Industry
Innovative
Treatment
System Grants
Environmental Protection
Agency
Under Section 105 of the Clean
Water Act industry may receive
Federal grants to construct
wastewater treatment facilities
aimed at developing and
demonstrating new or improved
methods of treating industrial
wastewaters or preventing
pollution which will have
industry-wide application. Such
grants may not exceed 75
percent of the projected costs.
The Clean Water Act, as
amended, also provides grants
for projects which can also
develop and demonstrate "new
or improved methods of joint
treatment systems for
municipal and industrial
wastewaters." The grants
program is a cost-sharing type
of agreement. However, the
Federal government bears the
full cost for some of EPA's
research and development
work, contracting with
appropriate non-government
entities for these services.
Through the contract or grant
device, EPA can support almost
any worthwhile project under
almost any type of institutional
arrangement.
Two basic conditions must be
met to receive a grant: First, the
project must have scientific and
technical merit. There must be
technical competence associated
with the project. Second, the
project activities must demon-
strate a way to combat water
pollution. The results must be
accurate in terms of both cost
and performance, and must be
made available to the public.
Inquiries should be addressed
to: Deputy Assistant Administra-
tor for Energy, Minerals and In-
dustry, RD-681, EPA 401 M
Street, S. W., Washington,
D. C. 20460.
Sections 103 and 104 of the
Clean Air Act also authorize
EPA to fund innovative
approaches to pollution control
being undertaken by air
pollution control, public and
private non-profit agencies,
institutions, organizations and
individuals. Such research and
development can be funded
through either a grant or
contract. Eligible projects are
those that demonstrate
innovative methods and
strategies for achieving
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards, or new and
improved ways of reducing air
pollution.
-------
Assistance for Industry
Industrial
Development
Bonds
Federal Tax
Incentives
The Congress has authorized
the sale of IDB's by State and
local governments to help
companies obtain the financing
needed to meet Federal
pollution control requirements.
These pollution control bonds
usually are sold by a State or
municipal agency to
underwriters who resell them to
investors. Funds raised must be
spent to meet air and water
pollution requirements.
Small issues are tax exempt
when the amount of the bonds
sold does not exceed $1 million,
or when the total capital
expenses on the facility being
financed do not exceed $5
million.
This type of financing has
been extensively utilized by
large business. Essentially, a
public entity issues tax exempt
revenue bonds on which
repayment is based solely upon
the credit of the business. The
bonds are re-paid or redeemed
by a trustee for the business.
The public entity is the nominal
owner of the property; the
property is conveyed to the
business under a lease, lease-
purchase, installment sales or
similar contract. The business
may obtain additional tax
advantages such as the
investment credit and
accelerated amortization.
The Internal Revenue Service
determines whether the interest
paid to bond purchasers is sub-
ject to Federal income tax.
Essentially all types of permanent
facilities such as piping, pump-
ing, and treatment units,
whether used for controlling
direct discharges or discharges
into municipal treatment facil-
ities, can be financed with such
bonds.
Information on Industrial
Development Bonds may be
obtained from the State
Development Agencies listed at
the end of this booklet.
Rapid amortization is an ac-
counting method for recovering
the cost of pollution control
equipment through depreciation
on an accelerated basis, or faster
than would ordinarily be allowed.
The Tax Reform Act of 1976,
section 2112, restored the rapid
amortization provision of the
tax code permitting the acceler-
ated write-off of pollution control
equipment. The 1976 statute
modified the earlier law in two
important respects. First, con-
current use of part of the invest-
ment tax credit and rapid amorti-
zation was allowed. Second,
devices which prevent the crea-
tion of pollution, such as fuel
desulfurization equipment, were
made eligible for certification.
Section 2112, however, excludes
from eligibility equipment which
"significantly" (defined in
legislative history and EPA
regulations as more than 5%) in-
creases output or capacity,
reduces the total operating cost
of the plant, or extends its useful
life. Facilities must still be cer-
tified and Federal governments in
order to be eligible for rapid
amortization. The reader should
refer to 40 C.F.R., Part 20, Cer-
tification of Facilities.
The 1976 legislation restored
rapid amortization as a perma-
nent provision for facilities in-
stalled after December 31, 1975
in plants in operation before
January 1, 1976. Further, for
those facilities installed after
December 31, 1976, the law per-
mitted concurrent use of the in-
vestment tax credit; however, if
the credit is used in conjunction
with rapid amortization only one-
half of the currently allowable in-
vestment credit may be claimed.
The Revenue Act of 1978
changed this rule to allow a 10%
investment credit for pollution
control facilities for which 5-year
amortization is elected unless the
facilities are also financed with
tax-exempt bonds. If the tax
payer uses both tax-exempt
financing and 5-year amortiza-
tion, the investment credit is
only 5%. Thus, to receive a 10%
investment credit subsequent to
the Revenue Act, the taxpayer
must choose between tax-
exempt financing and 5-year
amortization.
The new rule is applicable in
the case of facilities acquired or
constructed after December 31,
1978.
In assessing the significance of
the new rule, taxpayers should
realize that 5-year amortization of
pollution control facilities under
section 169 is allowable only in
the case of pollution control
facilities used in connection with
a plant or property that was in
operation prior to January 1,
1976.
Furthermore, if the pollution
control facility has a useful life in
excess of 15 years, only a por-
tion of the investment qualifies
for 5-year amortization. The
qualifying portion is the amount
of the investment that would be
depreciated over the first 15
-------
Assistance for Industry
Technical
Assistance
Grants
Threatened
Plant Studies
Economic Development
Administration
Environmental Protection
Agency
years if straight line depreciation
were used. For example, if a pol-
lution control device has an ex-
pected life of 20 years, three-
fourths of its cost (the amount
that would be depreciated in the
first 15 years with straight line
depreciation) can be amortized
over the first 5 years. The re-
maining one-fourth has to be
depreciated by a traditional
method, but this depreciation
can also begin in the first year,
and need not wait until the 16th.
These revisions were precipi-
tated by the fact that, after the
reinstatement of the investment
tax credit in 1971, rapid amor-
tization was used only infre-
quently because the standard in-
vestment tax credit plus standard
amortization practice provided
greater tax benefits. The con-
current use of a partial invest-
ment tax credit and rapid amorti-
zation under the 1976 Act made
the rapid amortization option
somewhat more attractive to in-
vestors in pollution control
equipment, and the 1978 Act
further increased the benefit.
The Economic Development
Administration administers a pro-
gram of grants for technical as-
sistance which can be used for
economic adjustment activities in
qualified locations. The technical
assistance can be used to deter-
mine the feasibility of specific
business projects, including the
feasibility of using financial assis-
tance to prevent a plant closing
or stimulating new economic
development after an area has
been adversely affected by envi-
ronmental regulations. Eligible
applicants are private non-profit
groups. State and local govern-
ments, and small business firms.
The program is currently funded
at approximately $15 million per
year. Initial contact for assistance
should be made through an EPA
regional office or contact:
The Director
Office of Technical Assistance
Economic Development
Administration
U. S. Department of Commerce
Main Commerce Building
Washington, D. C. 20230.
The Environmental Protection
Agency conducts studies of se-
lected situations where environ-
mental regulations may be in-
volved in a threatened plant
closing. In these studies, EPA
analyzes the financial situation of
the firm, and the impact of assis-
tance possibilities and enforce-
ment options on the ability of
the firm to remain in business.
The studies are undertaken only
in cooperation with both the firm
involved and EPA enforcement
personnel. Firms, groups of
workers, or communities which
are interested in having such a
study conducted should contact
the EPA regional enforcement
division handling the firm's case,
or the Industrial Analysis Branch,
Economic Analysis Division,
PM-220, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington,
D. C. 20460.
10
-------
Assistance for Industry
Publicly Owned
Treatment
Systems
Environmental Protection
Agency
Discharging waste water into a
publicly owned treatment works
(POTW) may result in significant
cost savings for an industry.
However, section 204(b)(1)(B) of
the Clean Water Act requires
that industrial users of POTWs
reimburse the Federal govern-
ment for the cost of constructing
that portion of the public facility
being used to treat or pretreat
the user's industrial wastes. The
resulting charges are called in-
dustrial cost recovery (ICR).
The capital costs, without
interest, are repaid over 30
years or the useful life of the
POTW, whichever is shorter.
Industrial cost recovery only
applies to the federal grant
portion (usually 75 percent) of
construction costs. When
recovering capital costs,
however, the POTWs may have
to charge interest to repay the
debt incurred in procuring the
remaining or local 25 percent
share. Interest costs on the local
share can be reduced when
State grants are used for part or
all of it.
POTWs which receive federal
wastewater construction grants
must also establish a user
charge system for the operation
and maintenance cost of the
plant. The municipality must
charge industry and residences
the full share of such costs and
no benefit that could be called a
subsidy or cost reduction
technique is allowed.
Although the current law re-
quires ICR and user charges,
discharging into a publicly-
owned system still is often less
costly — particularly for smaller
firms — than if the industry at-
tempts to fully treat the wastes
itself before discharging them
directly into a stream. One cost
saving is interest payments. ICR
does not require payment of any
interest charges, and is therefore
equivalent to an interest free
loan with up to a 30 year pay
back period. However, the use
of publicly owned systems is not
always less expensive. Often
firms must pretreat their wastes
before discharging them into
such a system, and the cost of
this pretreatment plus the user
and ICR charges can be greater
than the cost of full treatment
and direct discharge.
A municipality usually
calculates industrial cost
recovery by allocating the costs
covered by the federal grant to
the various components of
compatible industrial
wastewater; namely,
wastewater flow, suspended
solids and biological oxygen
demand. This allocation results
in a cost per unit for the quantity
of those three pollutants. The
total cost allocation is obtained
by multiplying a company's
actual discharges by their cost
per unit. The company is
assessed the allocated amount
over 30 years or, if shorter, the
useful life of the POTW.
An important question about
industrial cost recovery is what
happens to annual payments if
a company's discharge
subsequently is reduced in
volume or pollutant
concentration. The answer
depends on the agreement that
the company initially made with
the POTW. The annual
payments are not reduced if the
company has reserved a specific
capacity of the POTW.
Reserving capacity is the
equivalent of the company
having purchased a treatment
system of its own and being
accountable for the capital
costs. When no reserve capacity
is involved, the company's
annual payments decrease as
discharges are reduced.
Companies that do not reserve
capacity, however, run the risk
of not having access to the
POTW if they expand in the
future.
A POTW will automatically
establish an industrial cost
recovery system if it receives
federal grant money under the
Clean Water Act. Prior to
establishing the system the
POTW surveys their future
wastewater discharge plans. It
is important that companies
monitor and understand how
the POTW is establishing the
industrial cost recovery system.
There are no hard-and-fast
rules for allocating POTW costs
to industry, and the POTW has
considerable discretion in
making such allocations.
Therefore, the companies
involved have a stake in
insuring that the overall costs
are reasonable and the
allocations appropriate. Costs
should be discussed with POTW
officials and the POTW's
engineering firm.
The above cost calculation
procedure appears
straightforward. However, there
is considerable latitude in such
things as the methods by which
the municipality allocates costs,
the overall costs, and in what
constitutes normal and peak
discharges.
There are no certifications,
other special documents, or
application fees required by the
POTW for industrial cost
recovery. A significant user of a
POTW, ie., greater than 10
percent of the POTW capacity, is
required to sign a letter of intent
concerning future usage plans.
The letter of intent does not bind
the company to future plant
usage. Nor does it bind the
company to future payments
should it decide to leave the
POTW.
The Environmental Protection
Agency has issued guidelines to
municipalities to help them
establish industrial cost
recovery and user charge
systems. The title is: Federal
Guidelines-Cost Recovery
Systems, Industrial Cost
Recovery Systems, Municipal
Waste-Water Treatment Works,
Construction Grants Program,
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency MCD-45 Revised
August 1976.
11
-------
I
-------
Assistance for Communities
Coastal Energy
Impact Program
Urban
Development
Action Grant
Program
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric
Administration
Department of Housing
and Urban Development
The main goal of the Coastal
Energy Impact Program (CEIP) is
to help coastal communities ac-
commodate energy-related devel-
opment in a planned and envi-
ronmentally responsible manner.
Four basic kinds of assistance
are available under the CEIP
• Planning Grants are available
to coastal states and
communities preparing for the
consequences of all new or
expanded energy activity in the
coastal zone. In order to identify
a suitable location for a facility,
for example, a community may
have to conduct a natural
resource inventory, gathering
important data on local physical
conditions; it may have to plan
for improved means of
transportation to and from the
facility; community
development planning may be
required to locate new homes
and businesses to support new
residents; and, plans may have
to be made for the location and
scheduling of required new
public facilities.
• Credit Assistance is available
to communities in the form of
direct loans or guarantees of
loans or bonds.
• Repayment Assistance is also
available to a community that
cannot meet its CEIP credit
obligations because revenues
from coastal energy activity are
less than anticipated. This
guarantees that a community
receiving CEIP assistance will
not sustain a net fiscal loss from
coastal energy activity.
• Environmental Grants are
available to help prevent,
reduce, or repair damage to or
loss of valuable environmental
or recreational resources. If, for
example, the siting of an energy
facility results in the loss of or
damage to a public beach, a
community may use CEIP grants
to purchase access rights to a
similar beach area.
Further information can be
obtained from:
The Office of Coastal Zone
Management
Page Building #1
2001 Wisconsin Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20235
The Urban Development Action
Grant Program (UDAG) is
designed to combat economic
and physical distress through
the creation of new
partnerships between
governments at all levels, the
private sector, and
neighborhood groups. The
program seeks to stimulate
urban reinvestment in
communities of greatest
distress as defined by a
combination of factors including
the age of housing, percent of
poverty, population lag/decline,
job lag/decline, unemployment,
and growth in per capita
income. Action grants, that are
granted to localities are used to
leverage private investment in
neighborhood, commercial, and
industrial activities.
Action Grant funds may be
used for such activities as: land
clearance, site improvement,
rehabilitation, the provision of
financial participation in the
form of equity funding, loans,
loan guarantees, lease
guarantees, or other
appropriate arrangements for
joint public private
development.
The UDAG funds are part of
the community development
block grant program of the
Department of Housing and Ur-
ban Development, and have
recently averaged about $400
million annually. At least 25 per-
cent of the funds are set aside
for small communities with
populations of less than 50,000.
In addition to the special UDAG
funds, communities may use up
to 10 percent of the community
development block grants for
economic development activities
such as preventing plant closings
or stimulating development after
a plant closes.
For additional information,
contact the Office of Urban
Development Action Grants,
Room 7238, Office of
Community Planning and
Development, U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban
Development, Washington, D.C.
20410. The number to call is:
Area Code 202/ 755-6186.
Contact your HUD Area Office
regarding determinations of
eligibility.
13
-------
Assistance for Communities
Economic
Development
Grants
Water and
Waste Disposal
Loans and
Grants
Economic Development
Administration
Farmers Home
Administration
The Special Economic
Development and Adjustment
Assistance Program (Title IX) of
the Public Works and Economic
Development Act of 1965, as
amended, authorizes grants to
States and units of local
government threatened with
pending or actual dislocations
that would result in a significant
and permanent increase in
unemployment. Such
dislocations may take the form
of a shutdown of a major local
employer that is unable to
finance investments required to
comply with environmental
regulations.
Initially, assistance usually
takes the form of what is called
an adjustment planning grant.
Once an adjustment plan has
been prepared (and approved by
EDA), a Title IX Adjustment
Implementation Grant may be
awarded to carry out all or part
of the adjustment strategy.
Adjustment Implementation
funds granted local government
units may be used in any of a
number of ways, depending
upon what is called for in the
approved adjustment plan. The
local government may make
public works improvements that
comply with environmental
regulations; or it may loan the
funds to a local firm for anti-
pollution investments the firm
otherwise would be unable to
finance. If the plant has already
shut down, the funds may be
lent to a prospective new owner
to purchase and upgrade the
facility if private sector
financing cannot be obtained.
Proceeds of loan repayments to
the governmental unit go into a
revolving loan fund from which
further economic development
and adjustment loans can be
made.
Inquiries should be directed to
the Title IX Coordinator at any of
the Regional Offices of the
Economic Development
Administration, or to the
National Economic Adjustment
Title IX Coordinator, Economic
Development Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce,
Room 7814B, Washington, D.C.
20230. Regional Economic
Adjustment field coordinators
also are listed at the end of this
manual.
The Farmers Home Administra-
tion (FmHA) is authorized to
provide financial assistance for
water and waste disposal facil-
ities in rural areas and towns up
to 10,000 population. Public en-
tities such as municipalities,
counties, special purpose
districts, Indian Tribes, and cor-
porations not operated for profit
may receive assistance. Priority
will be given to public entities in
areas smaller than 5,500 people
to restore a deteriorating water
supply, improve, enlarge, or
modify a water system or an in-
adequate waste system.
Loans and grants also may be
used to:
1. Construct, repair, improve, ex-
pand, or otherwise modify rural
water supply reservoirs, wells,
pumping plants and water filtra-
tion and treatment facilities.
2. Acquire a water supply or a
water right.
3. Construct, repair, improve, ex-
pand, or otherwise modify waste
collection, treatment disposal
systems. Facilities to be financed
may include such items as sewer
lines, treatment plants, stabiliza-
tion ponds, storm sewer facilities,
sanitary landfills, incinerators and
necessary equipment such as
garbage trucks.
4. Pay necessary fees such as
legal and engineering develop-
ment of the facilities.
5. Pay other costs related to the
development of the facility in-
cluding acquisition of rights-of-
way and easements, and the
relocation of roads and utilities.
6. Finance projects in connection
with funds from other agencies
or those provided by the appli-
cant.
Loans are available to ap-
plicants who:
1. Are unable to obtain needed
funds from other sources at rea-
sonable rates and terms but are
financially sound and able to
manage the system effectively
and
2. Have legal capacity to borrow
and repay loans, to pledge
security for loans, and to operate
and maintain the facilities or ser-
vices.
3. Submit plans that are consis-
tent with any developmental
plans of the State, multijurisdic-
tional area, counties or munici-
palities in which the proposed
project is located.
Grants may be made for up to
75 per cent of a project's devel-
opment cost and may be used
by financially needy communities
to reduce user costs to a reason-
able level.
The maximum term on all
loans is 40 years. However, no
repayment period will exceed
statutory limitations on the
organization's borrowing authori-
ty nor the useful life of the im-
provement of the facility to be
financed.
Interest rates have been aver-
aging about 5 per cent on the
unpaid principal.
For additional information con-
tact: The local county or district
office of the Farmers Home Ad-
ministration.
14
-------
Assistance for Communities
Construction
Grants for
Municipalities
Environmental Protection
Agency
The U.S. Congress passed the
Federal Water Pollution Control,
or Clean Water, Act in 1956. A
major element of the Act
authorizes the Federal
government to award
municipalities grants for
financing construction of
sewage treatment facilities. The
program was significantly
expanded by the 1972
Amendments to the Act.
Under the construction grant
program, the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency (EPA) is autho-
rized to award grants totaling up
to 75% of the cost of a new
municipal treatment facility.
Grants for projects utilizing alter-
native or innovative processes or
technology may be increased to
85%. The remainder of the initial
costs are divided among State
and local governments and in-
dustrial users of the new system.
The law requires that
industrial users of publicly
owned works financed through
Federal grants, pay their
proportionate share of total
construction, operating,
maintenance and replacement
costs. Accordingly, when
industrial users hook up to
these facilties, they must (1) pay
a user charge based on
operating and maintenance
costs and (2) repay the portion
of the Federal grant which is
allocable to the treatment of
their industrial wastes. The
municipalities retain a share of
the repayments to help offset
their share of the treatment
facilities' cost and to provide
funds for future expansions.
The user charge system must
generate sufficient annual
revenue to offset all operational
and maintenance costs. It must
be reviewed periodically and
revised as necessary. A
surcharge may be levied when
pollutant concentrations from a
single source exceed normal
rates for domestic sewage.
There can be no discount rates
for large volume users.
Grants may also be made to
privately owned treatment works
serving one or more principal
residences or small commercial
establishments to abate an
existing water pollution or
public health problem. Eligible
establishments must have been
built and inhabited before
December 27, 1977. A public
body (municipality) must apply
on behalf of a number of such
units and certify that public
ownership of such works is not
feasible. The public body must
certify that the treatment works
will be properly maintained and
operated. User charges are
made for operating cost and
maintenance.
The cost of the facilities
must be less than the cost of
providing a collection and
central treatment system.
These are grants used to
construct alternative or
conventional treatment works
for individual residences or
clusters of residences.
Alternatives include, but are not
limited to, septic tanks and
other on-site systems; small
systems serving cluster
households; and pressure and
vacuum sewers.
Under Title II of the Clean
Water Act, EPA also can make
loan guarantees for construction
of treatment facilities.
The EPA Administrator is
authorized to guarantee loans
made to EPA grantees by the
Federal Financing Bank to
finance the local share of
construction costs. The
guarantees may not be made
unless the Administrator
certifies that the grantee cannot
finance their actual needs
without assistance because of
an inability to obtain sufficient
credit at what the Secretary of
the Treasury has deemed
reasonable terms. The
Administrator also must have
reasonable assurance that the
loan will be re-paid.
Inquiries about municipal treat-
ment grants should be sent to
the Municipal Construction Divi-
sion (WH 547), EPA, 401 M
Street, S. W., Washington,
D. C. 20460
Inquiries about loan guaran-
tees should be directed to the
Director, Grants Administration
Division (PM-215). Attention:
Municipal Loan Guarantee Pro-
gram, EPA, 401 M Street,
S. W., Washington, D. C.
20460.
15
-------
.„>' 'v'^
>•• • <-/;&ii§ ;
•« •*'.
-------
Assistance for Agriculture
Agricultural
Conservation
Program
Farm
Ownership and
Operating
Loans
Agricultural Stabilization
and Conservation Service
Farmers Home
Administration
Agriculture Stabilization and
Conservation Services (ASCS) ol
the U.S. Department of
Agriculture administers the
Agricultural Conservation Pro-
gram (ACP), the principal pro-
gram through which the Federal
Government shares with farmers
the cost of carrying out soil,
water, woodland and wildlife
conservation measures on
privately owned farmland. This
cooperative approach to meeting
the Nation's conservation and
pollution abatement needs was
originally authorized by the Con-
gress in 1936 in the Soil Conser-
vation and Domestic Allotment
Act.
Assistance ranges from 30 to
80 percent of the cost. Basic
measures include establishment
of protective soil cover, conserv-
ing and disposing of water, pro-
viding benefits to wildlife, pre-
venting or abating agriculture-
related pollution, and generally
improving the quality of the en-
vironment. The ACP's appropria-
tion has been averaging about
$190 million annually.
The pollution abatement por-
tion of the program was first
begun in 1970. Many of the anti-
pollution measures being under-
taken under the ACP are aimed
at controlling animal wastes.
Practices for controlling animal
waste and other pollution prob-
lems may be included in the ACP
under either annual or long-term
agreements. The long-term
agreements provide for schedul-
ing practice performance over a
period of 3 to 10 years based on
a farm plan. The practices must
follow prescribed engineering
plans developed by the Soil Con-
servation Service (SCS). The
amount of assistance to any one
person is limited to $3,500 in any
one year. Under the long-term
agreement plan, a producer may
establish certain measures one
year and other measures in a
future year. (For example, diver-
sions can be constructed around
the barn lot in one year and a
waste lagoon could be built the
next year.)
The ACP is administered at
the local level by the State and
County Agricultural Stabilization
and Conservation Committee.
The address for the county office
may be found in the telephone
directory under the U.S. Govern-
ment Offices. Inquiries may also
be directed to the Conservation
and Environmental Protection
Division, Agricultural Stabiliza-
tion and Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Washington, D.C. 20013.
The Farmers Home Administra-
tion (FmHA) makes Farm Owner-
ship and Operating loans to
qualified farmers and ranchers
who are or will become oper-
ators of farms no larger than
family size. Applicants must be
unable to obtain sufficient credit
elsewhere to finance their actual
needs. Farm Ownership loans
may be used to purchase and
develop farms, including struc-
tures, or farming enterprises that
are consistent with local anti-
pollution or environmental quali-
ty standards and regulations.
Operating loans can be used to
purchase livestock and equip-
ment and finance farming opera-
tions that comply with pollution
control and abatement. Individ-
ual farmers, cooperatives and
corporations or partnerships
primarily engaged in farming may
obtain soil and water loans for
developing, conserving and mak-
ing proper use of their land and
water resources. The farms must
have the required agricultural,
animal or poultry waste pollution
abatement and control facilities.
Farm ownership and soil and
water loans may not exceed
$200,000 when made by the
FmHA as insured loans or
$300,000 when made by other
lenders and guaranteed by
FmHA. The guarantee may not
exceed 90%. The interest rate is
established periodically by FmHA
for insured loans and is
negotiated between the lender
and borrower on guaranteed
loans. The maximum repayment
period is 40 years. Operating
loans may not exceed $100,000
when made by the FmHA as in-
sured loans or $200,000 when
made by other lenders and
guaranteed by FmHA. The
guarantee may not exceed 90%
The maximum initial repayment
period is 7 years and may be
rescheduled for 7 years.
Any legal entity, including in-
dividuals, partnerships, public
and private organizations, corpo-
rations, and federally recognized
Indian tribal groups may be eli-
gible for assistance.
Loans may be made in any
area outside the boundary of a
city of 50,000 or more and its im-
mediately adjacent urbanized
area with a population density of
more than 100 persons per
square mile. Priority will be given
to applications for projects in
open country, rural communities,
and towns of 25,000 and smaller.
Repayments of loans are
usually on a monthly basis with
maturity not to exceed 30 years
for land, buildings, and perma-
nent fixtures; 15 years, or the
useful life of machinery, which-
ever is shorter; and 7 years for
working capital. The interest rate
on guaranteed loans may be
fixed or variable and are deter-
mined by the lender and the bor-
rower.
Most FmHA assistance is pro-
vided through the loan guarantee
program, and application for
such a guarantee must be made
through the bank or other insti-
tution that would provide the
loan. Further information about
any of the FmHA programs can
be obtained from any of the
1,760 FmHA county offices.
Their addresses can be found in
the telephone directory, under
United States Government,
Department of Agriculture.
17
-------
Assistance for Agriculture
Soil and Water
Conservation
Soil Conservation
Service
The Soil Conservation Service
(SCSI was established under
authority of the Soil Conserva-
tion Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 163;
16 U.S.C. 590a-f). It is responsi-
ble for developing and carrying
out a national soil and water
conservation program in
cooperation with landowners and
operators, other land users and
developers, community planning
agencies, regional resource
groups, and other agencies of
government—Federal, State, and
local. The SCS also assists in
controlling agricultural pollution,
environmental improvement, and
rural community development.
The soil and water conserva-
tion program provides technical
help to locally organized and
operated conservation districts
and local sponsors of watershed
protection and resource conser-
vation and development projects.
It also assists individuals and
groups on a consultant basis.
There are approximately 3,000
conservation districts, covering
almost 2 billion acres in all the
States, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands.
Through the conservation
districts, the SCS gives land-
owners and operators the
technical assistance needed to
carry out locally-adapted soil and
water conservation programs.
Assistance to district
cooperators (individuals and
communities) includes: providing
soil and capability maps and
other resource data; providing
information about practical alter-
natives for treating and using the
land; developing plans for install-
ing treatment facilities and mak-
ing the land use change needed,
and helping to apply parts of the
plan that require special skills or
knowledge.
Soil surveys are made to deter-
mine potential soil use and the
type of treatment needed. The
SCS distributes its surveys and
interpretations to cooperators,
other Federal agencies, and
State and local organizations.
The National Cooperative Soil
Survey, which also is compiled
by the SCS, is used as the basis
for national conservation plan-
ning. The survey is conducted in
cooperation with State agricul-
tural experiment stations and
other State and Federal agen-
cies.
Other SCS activities include:
River Basin Surveys and In-
vestigations — The Service
cooperates with other Federal,
State, and local agencies in
developing coordinated water
resource programs.
Watershed Planning — The Ser-
vice is responsible for investi-
gating and surveying proposed
small watershed projects at the
request of sponsoring local
organizations, and with assisting
the sponsors in developing
watershed work plans.
Watershed and Flood Prevention
Operations — The Service works
with local sponsors. State, and
other public agencies on the in-
stallation of planned works of
improvement needed to: reduce
erosion, floodwater, and sedi-
ment damage; conserve,
develop, utilize, and dispose of
water; prevent floods and
develop fish and wildlife
habitats. It makes loans to local
organizations to help finance the
local share of the cost of carry-
ing out planned watershed and
flood prevention improvement
works. The Farmers Home Ad-
ministration administers the loan
program.
Great Plains Conservation Pro-
gram — The Service has general
responsibility for administering
programs designed to promote
greater agricultural stability in the
critical Great Plains area. The
Service shares the cost of con-
servation practices under 3 to
10-year contracts with farmers
and ranchers in designated coun-
ties of the 10 Great Plains
States, and provides the tech-
nical services needed to help make
land use adjustments and insure
that conservation measures
specified in conservation plans
are installed as scheduled by
contract.
Resource Conservation and
Development Program — The
Service is responsible for
assisting local sponsoring groups
accelerate land and water plan-
ning and development in multiple
county areas. Projects may in-
clude such measures as flood
prevention; the developing of
water resources for recreation,
wildlife, agricultural, municipal,
or industrial use; conservation
planning and the establishing of
individual land units; the improv-
ing of recreation facilities, in-
cluding historical and scenic at-
tractions; the encouraging of
new industries to locate in and
process products of an area; the
expanding of markets for crop
and livestock products; up-
grading and protecting the quali-
ty of the environment, and long-
range planning.
The SCS conducts investiga-
tions and surveys needed to
develop and plan conservation
and land use programs. It also
provides technical services and
financial assistance to sponsors,
local groups, and individuals,
and makes loans to improve and
develop resources.
Further information about any
of the Soil Conservation Service
Programs can be obtained from
the local Soil Conservation Ser-
vice office. Its address can be
found in the telephone directory
under United States Govern-
ment, Department of
Agriculture.
18
-------
Assistance for Agriculture
Rural Clean
Water Program
Rural
Abandoned
Mine Program
Soil Conservation
Service
Soil Conservation
Service
The Soil Conservation Service
has administrative leadership for
the Rural Clean Water Program
(RCWP) in the Department of
Agriculture. The objective of
this program is to improve water
quality in rural America. To be
eligible for financial and technical
assistance a proposed RCWP
project area must be included in
an approved agricultural portion
of a 208 water-quality manage-
ment plan. Any owner or
operator whose land or activities
in an approved project area are
contributing to the area's
agriculture nonpoint source
water-quality problems is eligible
to enter into a long-term (5 to 10
years) RCWP contract with the
agency designated to administer
the program in that project area.
The RCWP contract will include
measures incorporating practices
to reduce agricultural nonpoint
source pollution. The basis for
the RCWP contract is a land-
owner or operator water-quality
plan prepared with technical
assistance from the SCS and ap-
proved by a soil conservation
district. USDA will normally pay
up to 50 percent of the cost
identified for water-quality im-
provements.
The Soil Conservation Service
also administers the Rural Aban-
doned Mine Program (RAMP).
The program is designed to help
landowners develop and apply
plans for the reclamation, con-
servation and development of
eligible lands affected by coal
mining. RAMP provides cost
sharing for installing appropriate
reclamation and conservation
practices on abandoned coal mine
lands. The program is carried out
in cooperation with conservation
districts.
Additional information about
either the Rural Clean Water Pro-
gram or the Rural Abandoned
Mine Program can be obtained
from the local Soil Conservation
Service office, whose address
can be found in the telephone
directory under United States
Government.
19
-------
-------
State Programs
In addition to the Federal as-
sistance programs discussed in
this booklet, almost all States
have some form of assistance,
whether financial or tax incen-
tives, which can be used to
lower the cost of pollution con-
trol investment or to stimulate
new business investment after a
plant closing. Many States ad-
minister the Federal industrial
revenue programs which make
tax-exempt financing available to
firms installing pollution control
equipment. In addition, there are
a number of exemptions or cred-
its relating to property and sales
taxes on pollution control equip-
ment. Some States allow rapid
depreciation of pollution control
investments.
In addition to the incentive
programs specifically for pollu-
tion control investments, many
States have programs to support
economic development which
can be used to reduce the dis-
ruptive effect of a plant closing.
Among the programs available
under this category are direct or
guaranteed State loans, tax in-
centives for investment, state-
issued industrial development
bonds, and tax incentives for
research and development. For
further information on these pro-
grams, contact the State devel-
opment agencies listed on pages
24-25
21
-------
State Programs
State Financial Assistance for
State
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
ffl.S
~
91 ^^
u S 1M
.E -5 2
U. _O 3
2 5 •
w £ c
O
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
3
"5
0.
o
o
a.
E
e
X
LU «,
X §
>k &
o 2.
&ll|
o _
£ 2
"5 c
0 0
(TO
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
Pollution Control
"5
c
o
o
c
o
J3
"o
"5
c
o
s
'5
a
o
O
•a
0)
5 M
2 o
S-2
a> =
g 5
O
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
0
s
0
u
c
o
3
s.
w
c
5
a
o
Ul
a
t-
»
3 g
V V
Vt 'S.
"5 a
U) u.
O
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
c
E
a.
o
1
Q
Is
»•
3
•o
c
1
0
U)
2 >
& *-
CO "w
® £
II
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
•o
c
03
c
o
a
'5
UJ
o
«
c
a
_2
3
o
u
k
o
& w
O— £
c
Q) £
IB ^
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1 *
3 "»
= £
p o
°- s
^ tn
•5 e
s a
O m
c °>
(0 ^
"a o
E «
5 1
1 c
e
o
\
08
£
o
Q
M
•a
c
3
0 W
** c
a? £
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
Site Selection Handbook, Vol. 22, No. 2, May 1977. By permission of the publisher, Conway Publications, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. No further reproduction permitted.
22
-------
State Programs
State
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
VJO. CAROLINA
vJO. DAKOTA
DHIO
DKLAHOMA
DREGON
3ENN.
3HODE ISLAND
SO. CAROLINA
SO. DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
W.VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISL.
•o!
Sg
85
5 o
?!
•2 £
EOo,
2 c.S
O) O o
lis
o. = c
dio.
(0 o CQ
.5-5 «
U. CO 3
«? 0
W £ DC
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
1
o
a.
o
c
o
'•§.
UJ „
X g
CO ®
rl
8 c-
auj
*S
To c
3 o
CO
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
«rf
o
y
c
o
"o
a.
•5
c
tO
to
'5
£
CD
a
^
o
s «
k. ffi
5|
4} —
II
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
*«
0
0
o
7
"5
a.
k
£
c
Q
a
E
Q}
X
111
UJ
X
a
is
~«i
I'i
(Oil.
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
c
CO
a
0
!
Q
1
1
•o
c
T>
£
s
c
*ȣ
CO <
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
?
eg
1
a
'5
s
I
in
c
3
e
3
o
o
o
O e
•1
11
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
5
~o
a.
5
i
o
o
c
a
~Q.
c
0
k.
£
II
is
go
HO
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
•o
CO
o
ea
a>
s
cc
0)
0)
s
2
o
U
c
UJ
o
ll
1 1
uj ~Z
HQ
o
o
0
o
o
o
s
"
1
0
0
c
o
"3
a.
s
(S
•o
a
h
CO
2
CO
w
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
a
'5
£
CO
c
•a
§
00
CO
3
c
CO
CO
DC
2-
c
o
0
o
oB
5-
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
CO
£
i
>>
i
o
o
s
(0
2-
o
1
in
•o
3
U.
S c
co Z
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
23
-------
State Agencies
State Development
Agencies
Industrial Development Director
Alabama Development Office
3734 Atlanta Highway
c/o State Capitol
Montgomery, AL 36130
(205) 832-6980
Commissioner,
Alaska Department of Economic
Development
Pouch D
Juneau, AK 99811
(907) 465-2020
Executive Director,
Arizona Department of Economic
Planning and Development
1645 West Jefferson Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
(602) 271-5371
Executive Director,
Arkansas Industrial Development
Commission
205 State Capitol
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501)371-2052
Director,
Economic and Business Development
Department
111 N Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 322-1394
Division of Commerce and
Development
500 State Centennial Building
Denver, CO 80203
(303) 839-2350
Executive Director of Development
Connecticut Department of
Commerce
210 Washington Street
Hartford, CT06106
(203) 566-5546
Director,
Delaware Department of Community
Affairs & Economic Development
630 State College Road
Dover, DE 19901
(302) 678-4254
Director,
Division of Commercial Development
Florida Department of Commerce
107 West Gaines Street
Tallahassee, FL 32304
(904) 488-6300
Commissioner,
Georgia Department of Community
Development
1400 North OMNI International
Atlanta, GA 30301
(404) 656-3556
Hawaii Department of Planning and
Economic Development
250 S. King Street
Honolulu, HI 96813
(808) 548-4025
Idaho Economic Development
Administration
2404 Bank Drive
Suite 304
Boise, Idaho 83705
(208) 384-1521
Director,
Illinois Department of Business and
Economic Development
222 South College
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-7500
Executive Director,
Indiana Department of Commerce
332 State House
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 633-4450
Director,
Iowa Development Commission
250 Jewett Building
Des Moines, IA 50309
(515) 281-3619
Director,
Kansas Department of Economic
Development
6th Floor, 503 Kansas Avenue
Topeka, KS 66603
(913) 296-3481
Commissioner,
Kentucky Department of Commerce
Capitol Plaza Towers - 22nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-4270
Director,
Louisiana Department of Commerce
and Industry
P.O. Box 44185, Capitol Station
Baton Rouge, LA 70804
(504) 389-5371
State Planning Office
184 State Street
Augusta, ME 04333
Deputy Secretary,
Maryland Department of Economic
and Community Development
2525 Riva Road
Anapolis, MD 21401
(301)269-3265
Massachusetts Department of
Commerce and Development
Government Center
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202
(617) 727-3218
Director,
Office of Economic Expansion
Michigan Department of Commerce
Law Building - 4th Floor
Lansing, Ml 48913
(517) 373-3530
Commissioner,
Department of Economic
Development
480 Cedar Street, Hanover Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 296-2755
Director,
Mississippi Agricultural and Industrial
Board
P.O. Box 849
1504 State Office Building
Jackson, MS 39205
(601)354-6711
Director,
Missouri Division of Commerce and
Industrial Development
8th Floor, Jefferson Building
Jefferson City, MO 65101
(314) 751-4241
Director,
Office of Commerce and Small
Business Development
Room 108, State Capitol Building
Helena, MT 59601
(406) 449-3923
Director,
Department of Economic
Development
State Office Building
301 Centennial Mall South
Lincoln, NE 68509
(402)471-3111
Director,
Nevada Department of Economic
Development
Blasdel Building
Carson City, NV 89701
(702) 882-7478
24
-------
State Agencies
Director,
Office of Industrial Development
Box 856
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 271-2591
Director,
Division of Economic Development
P.O. Box 2766
Trenton, NJ 08625
(609) 292-7757
Director,
New Mexico Department of
Development
113 Washington Avenue
Santa Fe, NM 87503
(505) 827-3101
President,
New York State Environmental
Facilities Corp.
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12205
(518) 457-4100
Industrial Financing
New York State Department of
Commerce
99 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12245
(518) 474-4100
Director, Industrial Development
Division
North Carolina Department of
Commerce
430 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 733-3151
Director,
Business and Industrial Development
Department
State Office Building
Bismarck, ND 58501
(701)224-2810
Ohio Air Quality Development
Authority and Ohio Water Quality
Development Authority
50 West Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 224-3383
Director,
Department of Industrial
Development
Office of the Governor
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
(405) 521-2401
Director,
Department of Economic
Development
317 S.W. Alder 9th Floor
Portland, OR 97204
(503) 229-5535
Secretary,
Pennsylvania Department of
Commerce
South Office Building
Harrisburg, PA17120
(717)787-3003
Deputy Administrator,
Puerto Rico Economic Development
Administration
Continental Operations Branch
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10010
(212) 245-1200
Administrator,
Puerto Rico Economic Development
Administration
G.P.O. Box 2350
San Juan, PR 00936
Director,
Rhode Island Department of
Economic Development
One Weybosset Hill
Providence, Rl 02908
(401)277-2601
Director,
South Carolina State Development
Board
P.O. Box 927
Columbia, SC 29202
(803) 758-3145
Director,
Department of Economic and
Tourism Development
620 South Cliff
Sioux Falls, SD 57103
(605) 339-6779
Commissioner,
Department of Economic and
Community Development
1007 Andrew Jackson State Office
Building
500 Deaderick Street
Nashville, TN 37219
(615) 741-1888
Executive Director,
Texas Industrial Commission
410 E. Fifth Street
Capitol Station, Box 12728
Austin, TX 78711
(512) 472-5059
Executive Director,
Department of Development
Services
Room 104, State Capitol
Salt Lake City, UT84114
(801)533-5961
Secretary,
Vermont Agency of Development
and Community Affairs
Montpelier, VT 05602
(802)828-3211
Commissioner,
Virgin Islands Department of
Commerce
P.O. Box 1693, Charlotte Amalie
St. Thomas, VI 00801
(809) 774-1331
Director,
Virginia Division of Industrial
Development
1010 State Office Building
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 786-3791
Department of Economic and
Commercial Development
Governor's Office
Charleston, WV 25301
(304) 348-2000
Wisconsin Department of Business
Development
123 West Washington Avenue
Madison, Wisconsin 53703
(608) 266-8773
Executive Director,
Department of Economic Planning
and Development
Barrett Bldg.
Cheyenne, WO 82002
(307) 777-7234
25
-------
Federal Agencies
SBA Field Offices
REGION CITY
RO Boston
DO Boston
POD Holyoke
DO Augusta
1 DO Concord
DO Hartford
DO Montpelier
DO Providence
RO New York
DO New York
POD Melville
DO Hato Rey
POD St. Thomas
II DO Newark
POD Camden
DO Syracuse
BO Buffalo
BO Elmira
POD Albany
POD Rochester
RO Philadelphia
DO Philadelphia
BO Harrisburg
BO Wilkes-Barre
BO Wilmington
III DO Baltimore
DO Clarksburg
BO Charleston
DO Pittsburgh
DO Richmond
DO Washington
RO Atlanta
DO Atlanta
DO Birmingham
DO Charlotte
POD Greenville
DO Columbia
DO Jackson
IV BO Biloxi
DO Jacksonville
DO Louisville
DO Miami
POD Tampa
DO Nashville
BO Knoxville
POD Memphis
POD West Palm Beach
RO Chicago
DO Chicago
BO Springfiled
DO Cleveland
DO Columbus
V BO Cincinnati
DO Detroit
BO Marquette
DO Indianapolis
DO Madison
BO Milwaukee
POD Eau Claire
DO Minneapolis
STATE
Mass.
Mass.
Mass.
Maine
N.H.
Conn.
Vt.
R.I.
N.Y.
N.Y.
N.Y.
Puerto Rico
Virgin Island
N.J.
N.J.
N.Y.
N.Y.
N.Y.
N.Y.
N.Y.
Bala Cynwyd, Pa.
Bala Cynwyd, Pa.
Pa.
Pa.
Del.
Towson Md.
W. Va.
W. Va.
Pa.
Va.
D.C.
Ga.
Ga.
Ala.
N.C.
N.C.
S.C.
Miss.
Miss.
Fla.
Ky.
Coral Gables Fla.
Fla.
Tenn.
Tenn.
Tenn.
Fla.
III.
III.
III.
Ohio
Ohio
Ohio
Mich.
Mich.
Ind.
Wis.
Wis.
Wis.
Minn.
ZIP CODE
02110
02114
01040
04330
03301
06103
05602
02903
10007
10007
11746
00919
00801
07102
08104
13260
14202
14901
12210
14614
19004
19004
17102
18702
19801
21204
26301
25301
15222
23240
20417
30309
30309
35205
28202
27834
29201
39201
39530
32202
40202
33134
33602
37219
37902
38103
33402
60604
60604
62701
44199
43215
45202
48226
49855
46204
53703
53202
54701
55402
ADDRESS (TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR PUBLIC USE ONLY)
60 Battery March 10th. Fl.
150 Causeway St., 10th Floor
302 High Street-4th Floor
Federal Building, 40 Western Ave., Room 512
55 Pleasant St., Room 213
One Financial Plaza
Federal Building, 87 State St., Rm. 204 Box 605
57 Eddy St., Room 7th Fl
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3214
26 Federal Plaza, Room 3100
425 Broad Hollow Rd. Rm. 205
Chardon and Bolivia Streets, PO Box 1915
U.S. Fed. Ofc. Bldg., Veterans Dr., Rm. 283
970 Broad St., Room 1 635
1 800 East Davis Street
Federal Building-Room 1073-100 South Clinton Street
111 West Huron St., Room 1311, Federal Building
180 State Street- Rm. 412
99 Washington Ave., Twin Towers Bldg., Room 921
Federal Building, 100 State Street
231 St. Asaphs Rd.. 1 Bala Cynwyd Plaza, Suite 646 West Lobby
231 St. Asaphs Rd., 1 Bala Cynwyd Plaza, Suite 400 East Lobby
1 500 North 2nd Street
Penn Place, 20 N. Pennsylvania Ave.
844 King Street, Federal Building, Rm. 5207
Oxford Bldg., 8600 LaSalle Road, Rm. 630
109 North 3rd St., Room 301, Lowndes Building
Charleston National Plaza, Suite 628
Federal Building, 1000 Liberty Ave., Room 1401
Federal Building, 400 North 8th St., Room 3015 Box 10126
1030 15th St. N.W. Suite 250
1375 Peachtree St., N.E.
1720 Peachtree Steet, N.W., 6th Floor
908 South 20th St., Room 202
230 S. Tryon Street Suite 700
215 South Evans Street Rm. 206
1801 Assembly St., Room 131
Providence Capitol Bldg., Suite 690, 200 E. Pascagoula St.
1 1 1 Fred Haise Blvd., Gulf Nat. Life Insurance Bldg. 2nd Floor
Federal Building, 400 West Bay St., Room 261, PO Box 35067
Federal Building, 600 Federal PI., Room 188
2222 Ponce De Leon Blvd., 5th Floor
1802 700 Twiggs St., Suite 607
404 James Robertson Parkway, Suite 1012
502 South Gay St., Room 307, Fidelity Bankers Building
Federal Building, 167 North Main St., Room 211
Federal Building, 701 Clematis St., Room 229
Federal Building, 219 South Dearborn St., Room 838
Federal Building, 219 South Dearborn St., Room 437
One North, Old State Capital Plaza
1240 East 9th St., Room 317
Federal Bldg., U.S. Courthouse, 85 Marconi Blvd.
Federal Building, 550 Main St.
477 Michigan Ave., McNamara Building
540 W. Kaye Ave., Don H. Bottum University Center
575 North Pennsylvania St., Rm. 552 New Fed. Bldg.
1 22 West Washington Ave., Room 713
Federal Bldg., Rm. 246, 517 East Wisconsin Ave.
500 South Barstow St., Room 89AA, Fed. Off.
Bldg. & U.S. Courthouse
12 South 6th St., Plymouth Building
(617)223-2100
(617)223-2100
(413)536-8770
(207)622-6171
(603) 224-4041
(203) 244-3600
(802) 229-0538
(401)528-4580
(212)264-1468
(212)264-4355
(516)752-1626
(809) 763-6363
(809) 774-8530
(201 ) 645-2434
(609)757-5183
(315)423-5370
(716)846-4301
(607) 733-4686
(518)472-6300
(716)263-6700
(215)597-3311
(215)597-3311
(717)782-3840
(717)826-6497
(302) 573-6294
(301 ) 962-4392
(304) 623-5631
(304)343-6181
(412)644-2780
(804)782-2617
(202) 655-4000
(404) 881 -4943
(404)881-4325
(205)254-1344
(704) 372-071 1
(919)752-3798
(803) 765-5376
(601)969-4371
(601)435-3676
(904) 791 -3782
(502) 582-5971
(305) 350-5521
(813)228-2594
(615)251-5881
(615)637-9300
(901)521-3588
(305) 659-7533
(312)353-0355
(312)353-4528
(217)525-4416
(216)522-4180
(614)469-6860
(513)684-2814
(313)226-6075
(906)225-1108
(317)269-7272
(608) 252-5261
(414)291-3941
(715)834-9012
(612)725-2362
26
-------
Federal Agencies
REGION
RO
DO
POD
DO
DO
DO
VI DO
BO
DO
BO
DO
POD
DO
DO
RO
DO
VII DO
DO
DO
DO
RO
DO
DO
VIII DO
DO
DO
DO
BO
RO
DO
BO
POD
DO
IX POD
DO
BO
DO
DO
DO
RO
DO
DO
X BO
DO
DO
DO
CITY
Dallas
Dallas
Marshall
Albuquerque
Houston
Little Rock
Lubbock
El Paso
Lower Rio
Grande Valley
Corpus Christi
New Orleans
Shreveport
Oklahoma City
San Antonio
Kansas City
Kansas City
Des Moines
Omaha
St. Louis
Wichita
Denver
Denver
Casper
Fargo
Helena
Salt Lake City
Sioux Falls
Rapid City
San Francisco
San Francisco
Fresno
Sacramento
Las Vegas
Reno
Honolulu
Agana
Los Angeles
Phoenix
San Diego
Seattle
Seattle
Anchorage
Fairbanks
Idaho
Portland
Spokane
STATE
Tex.
Tex.
Tex.
N. Mex.
Tex.
Ark.
Tex.
Tex.
Harlingen, Tex.
Tex.
La.
La.
Okla.
Tex.
Mo.
Mo.
Iowa
Neb.
Mo.
Kan.
Colo.
Colo.
Wyo.
N. Dak.
Mont.
Utah
S. Dak.
S. Dak.
Calif.
Calif.
Calif.
Calif.
Nev.
Nev.
Hawaii
Guam
Calif.
Ariz.
Calif.
Wash.
Wash.
Alaska
Alaska
83701
Oreg.
Wash.
ZIP CODE
75235
75242
75670
87110
77002
72201
79401
79901
78550
78408
70113
71101
73102
78206
64106
64106
50309
68102
63101
67202
80202
80202
82602
58102
59601
84138
57102
57701
94102
94105
93712
95825
89101
89505
96850
96910
90071
85004
92188
98104
98174
99501
99701
97204
99210
ADDRESS (TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR PUBLIC USE ONLYI
1720 Regal Row, Regal Park Office Bldg., Rm. 230
1 100 Commerce St., Room 3C36
100 South Washington Street, Federal Building G-12
5000 Marble Ave., N.E., Patio Plaza Bldg. Rm. 320
One Allen Ctr., 500 Dallas Street
611 Gaines St., Suite 900
1205 Texas Ave., 712 Federal Office Bldg. & U.S. Courthouse
4100 Rio Bravo, Suite 300
222 East Van Buren Street Box 2567
3105 Leopard St.
1001 Howard Ave., Plaza Tower, 17th Floor
Fannin Street, U.S. Post Office & Courthouse Building
Fed. Bldg., 200 N.W. 5th St., Suite 670
727 E. Durango, Rm A-513 Federal Bldg.
91 1 Walnut St., 23rd Floor
1150 Grande Ave. -5th Floor
New Federal Building, 210 Walnut St., Room 749
Nineteenth and Farnum Streets, Empire State Building
Suite 2500, Mercantile Tower, One Mercantile Center
1 10 East Waterman Street, Main Place Building
Executive Tower Bldg., 1405 Curtis Street, 22nd Floor
721 1 9th St., Room 426A
Federal Building, Room 4001, 100 East B St. Box 2839
Federal Building, 653 2nd Ave., North, Room 218
618 Helena Avenue Box 4819
Federal Building, 125 South State St., Room 2237
National Bank Building, 8th & Main Ave., Room 402
515 9th St., Federal Bldg. (Room) 246
450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36044
21 1 Main Street 4th Fl.
1229N. St., P.O. Box 828
2800 Cottage Way
301 E. Stewart Box 7527, Downtown Station
50 South Virginia St., Rm. 308 Box 3216
300 Ala Moana, P.O. 50207
Pacific Daily News Bldg., Rm. 507
350 S. Figueroa St., 6th Floor
1 1 2 North Central Ave.
880 Front Street, Federal U.S. Building, Room 4-S-33
710 2nd Ave., 5th Floor, Dexter Horton Building
915 Second Ave. Federal Building -Room 1744
1016 West 6th Ave., Suite 200, Anchorage Legal Center
Federal Building and Courthouse, P.O. Box 14, 101 12th Ave.
1005 Main St., 2nd Fl., Continental Life Bldg.
1220 S.W. Third Avenue, Federal Building
Court House Building, Room 651 Box 21 67
(214) 749-2531
(214)749-3961
(214)935-5257
(505) 766-3430
(713)226-4341
(501)378-5871
(806) 762-701 1
(915) 543-7200
(512)423-8934
(512)888-3011
(504) 589-261 1
(318)226-5196
(405)231-4301
(512)229-6250
(816)374-3318
(816)374-5557
(515)284-4422
(402)221-4691
(314)425-4191
(316) 267-6311
(303) 837-01 1 1
(303) 837-01 1 1
(307) 265-5550
(701)237-5771
(406) 449-5381
(801 ) 524-5800
(605) 336-2980
(605) 343-5074
(415)556-7487
(415)556-7490
(209) 487-5000
(916)484-4726
(702) 385-601 1
(702) 784-5477
(808) 546-8950
**( ) 777-8420
(213)688-2956
(602)261-3611
(714)293-5440
(206) 442-5676
(206) 442-5534
"(907) 272-5561
(907)452-1951
(208)384-1096
(503)221-2682
(509) 456-3777
"Dial Operator for Assistance
10 Regional Off ices (RO)
63 District Offices (DO)
18 Branch Offices (BO)
15Post-of-dulv(POD)
27
-------
Federal Agencies
EDA Business
Development Offices
Director
Office of Business Development
Economic Development
Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce.
Room 7866
Washington, D.C. 20230
Telephone: 202/377-5236
Chief, Business Development
Division
Economic Development
Administration
William J. Green, Jr. Federal
Building
600 Arch Street (Room 10424)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 10106
Telephone: 215/597-7889
Chief, Business Development
Division
Economic Development
Administration
Suite 700
1365 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: 404/257-2841
Chief, Business Development
Division
Economic Development
Administration
Suite 505, Title Building
909-17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: 303/327-4403
Chief, Business Development
Division
Economic Development
Administration
175 W. Jackson Boulevard
Suite A-1630 (16th Floor)
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Telephone: 312/353-4764
Chief, Business Development
Division
Economic Development
Administration
Lake Union Building, Suite 500
1700 Westlake Avenue, North
Seattle, Washington 98109
Telephone: 206/399-4730
Chief, Business Development
Division
Economic Development
Administration
American Bank Tower, Suite 600
221 West Sixth Street
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: 512/734-5217
EDA Economic
Adjustment Coordinators
National Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce,
Room 7814B
Washington, D.C. 20230
Telephone: 202/377-2659
Regional Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
William J. Green, Jr. Federal
Building
600 Arch Street (Room 10424)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
Telephone: 215/597-7893
Regional Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
Suite 700
1365 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: 404/257-7401
Regional Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
Suite 505, Title Building
909-17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: 303/327-4716
Regional Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
175 W. Jackson Boulevard
Suite A-1630 (16th Floor)
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Telephone: 312/353-4735
Regional Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
Lake Union Building, Suite 500
1700 Westlake Avenue, North
Seattle, Washington 98109
Telephone: 206/399-4740
Regional Economic Adjustment
Coordinator
Economic Development
Administration
American Bank Tower, Suite 600
221 West Sixth Street
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: 512/734-5469
Financial Assistance
Coordinators at EPA
HEADQUARTERS
Sheldon Sacks
Financial Assistance Coordinator
Office of Analysis & Evaluation
Environmental Protection Agency
Room 845 E.T. (WH-586)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
AC 202 755-3624
REGION 1
CT, ME. MA. NH, Rl. VT
Ted Landry, Chemical Engineer
Enforcement Division
Environmental Protection Agency
Room 2109
John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg.
Boston, MA 02203
AC 617 223-5061
REGION 2
NJ. NY. PR. VI
Kenneth Eng, Chief
Air & Environmental Applications
Sect.
Enforcement Division
Environmental Protection Agency
Room 10009
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10007
AC 212 264-4726
REGION 3
DE, MD. PA, VW. DC. VA
Chuck Sapp, Chief
Office of Special Programs
Enforcement Division
Environmental Protection Agency
Curtis Building
6th & Walnut Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19106
AC 215 597-9433
REGION 4
AL. FL, GA. KY. MS. NC. SC. TN
John Hurlebaus, Supervisor
Grants Analysis
Program Support Branch
Grants Administrative Support Sect.
Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30308
AC 404 257-4793
REGION 5
IL. IN. Wl. Ml. MN. OH
Chester Marcyn, Contingency Plan
Coordinator
Surveillance and Analysis Branch
Enforcement Division
Environmental Protection Agency
536 South Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60605
AC 213 353-2316
REGION 6
AR. LA. NM. OK. TX
Roger Hartung, Acting Chief
Water Program Branch
Water Division
Environmental Protection Agency
1st International Bldg.
1201 Elm Street
Dallas, TX 75270
AC 214 729-2662
REGION 7
KS. MO. NB. IA
Paul Walker, Chief
Engineering Branch
Water Division
Environmental Protection Agency
1735 Baltimore Avenue
Kansas City, MO 64108
AC 816 758-2725
REGION 8
CO. WY. MT. NO. SD. UT
Gerald Burke, Sanitary Engineer
Office of Grants
Water Division
Environmental Protection Agency
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, CO 80203
AC 303 327-4579
REGION 9
AZ. CA. HI. NV. GU. SAMOA
Stan Leibowitz, Chief
General Services
Permits Branch
Enforcement Division
Environmental Protection Agency
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
AC 415 442-1270
REGION 10
AK. OK. WA, ID
Dan Bodien, Special Technical
Advisor
Enforcement Division
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
AC 206 442-1270
28
------- |