United States ' Office of Errergencv & 6 nvironmental Protection Remediai Resoonse Agency Washington, DC 20460 HW—10.6 BACKGROUND mPORMATICN: PRIORITIES LIST, FINAL RULES, MARCH 1989 The U.S. EnviTOTnrental Protection Agency (EPA) is adding 101 sites, (including 8 Federal facility sites) to the National Priorities List (NPL), expanding 2 already final Federal facility sites, and reclassifying another final site as a Federal facility site. Eight sites have been deleted from the NPL since the June 1988 rule, resulting in a final NPL of 890 sites, of which 41 are in the Federal section. Four proposed sites are being dropped from further consideration, leaving 273 sites proposed for the NPL, of which 22 are in the Federal section. Final and proposed sites total 1,163. These actions are published in three Federal Register notices; One, published March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512) is devoted to Federal facility sites. A second notice, also published on March 13 (54 FR 10520), announces a policy for listing certain types of Federal facility sites. The third notice, published in late March, adds new sites to the NPL. The two rules include new final sites from 33 of the 50 States, the District of Columbia/" and 6 Territories. Pennsylvania leads with 12 new final sites, followed by New York with 10 and Michigan with 7. Of the States and Territories, seven have no sites on the new final NPL: American Samoa, Ccmnonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Nevada, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the Virgin Islands. New Jersey has the largest number of final sites (100), followed by New York (73), Pennsylvania (71), Michigan (65), and California (52). The NPL identifies abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that warrant further investigation to determine if remediai response is necessary. Sites on the NPL are eligible for long-term remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCIA), enacted on December 11, 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), enacted on October 17, 1986. SARA authorized a "Hazardous Substances Superfund" totalling $8.5 billion over 5 years to pay costs not assumed by responsible parties for cleaning up waste sites. (CERCIA authorized $1.5 billion over 5 years.) EPA has the primary responsibility for managing site investigation, cleanup, and enforcement activities under Superfund. This document provides background information on these actions and the "ollowing lists: «, o The 101 new final sites being added to the NPL arranged alphabetically by State (page 11). o The distribution of all sites by State arranged by the number of new final sites (page 15). -1- ------- Contents of Rule All but one of the 101 sites are being added to the NFL because they have scores of 28.50 or above on the Hazard Ranking System (HRS), a numerically based system designed to evaluate the relative risks posed by a site to human health or the environment. Each State may designate a single site as its top priority. Such sites do not require an HRS score of 28.50 or above. Wisconsin's top- priority site, N.W. Mauthe Co. in Appleton, is among the new final sites. Its HRS score is below 28.50. The new final sites were in several proposed rules: o o o o o o Update Update Update Update Update Update #2: #3: #4: #5 #6 #7 6 2 2 15 12 64 Update #7, proposed on June 24, 1988, consisted of 229 sities, including 14 Federal facility sites. The formal comment period closed on August 23, 1988. Of the 229, 64 received no comments and are being added to the NPL. The 273 sites remaining in proposed status can be grouped in this way: Sites Federal facility sites Total Update #1 (Sept. 8, 1983, 48 FR 40674) 20 2 Update #2 (Oct. 15, 1984, 49 FR 40320) 41 4 45 Update #3 (April 10, 1985, 50 FR 14115) 62 8 Update #4 (Sept. 18, 1985, 50 FR 37950) 11 2 . 13 Update #5 (June 10, 1986, 51 FR 21099) 11 2 13 Update #6 (Jan. 22, 1987, 52 FR 2492) 27 0 27 Update #7 (June 24, 1988, 53 FR 23988) 153 12 165 251 22 273 The sites remain proposed pending completion of review of comments or resolution of technical or policy issues. All proposed sites will be considered for listing in future final rules. Deletion of Final Sites At the time of the NPL rulemaking of June 1988, 799 sites were on the final NPL. Since then, 10 sites have been deleted because EPA and the State determined that all appropriate response has been taken: o September 1, 1988^(53 FR 33811) - Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc., Tampa, FL -2- ------- - Varsol Spill (once listed as part of the Biscayne Aquifer), Miami, FL o December 23, 1988 (53 FR 51780) - Toftdahl Drums, Brush Prairie, WA o January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2124) - Matthews Electroplating, Roanoke County, VA o February 13, 1989 (54 FR 6521) - Presque Isle, Erie, PA o February 21, 1989 (54 FR 7424) - Parramore Surplus, Mount Pleasant, FL o February 22, 1989 (54 FR 7548/7549) - Cooper Road, Voorhees Township, NJ - Krysowaty Farm, Hillsborough, NJ o March 17, 1989 (54 FR 11203) - New Castle Steel, New Castle County, DE O March 22, 1989 (54 FR 11949) - Wade (ABM), once listed as ABM-Wade, Chester, PA Proposed sites Dropped From Further Consideration EPA revised the HRS scores for 17 of the new final sites based on its review of comments and additional information. In four cases, scores dropped below the cutoff of 28.50. Accordingly, these four sites are being dropped from the proposed NPL at this time: o Montco Research Products, Inc., Hollister, FL o E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (Montague Plant) Montague, MI o Horstmann's Dump, East Hanover, NJ o Olson Neihart Reservoir, Wasatch-County, UT RCRA-Related Sites When the first final NPL was promulgated in September 1983, EPA announced certain listing policies relating to sites that might qualify for the NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject to Subtitle ------- C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA's policy was generally to defer from the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (that is, land disposal units that received hazardous waste after the effective date of the RCRA land disposal regulations). In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments were enacted, expanding EPA's authority to require corrective measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy for placing RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June 10, 1986, (54 FR 21109) announced three major components of a final RCRA policy. Specifically, EPA announced that facilities subject to Subtitle C correction action authorities of RCRA would not be deferred but would be placed on the NPL if one or more of these conditions exist: o Ihe facilities are owned by persons who have demonstrated inability to finance appropriate remedial action by invoking bankruptcy laws. o The facilities have lost authorization to operate, and there are additional indications that the owner or operator is unwilling to undertake corrective action. o The facilities have not lost authorization to operate but have a clear history of unwillingness. These situations are determined on a case-by-case basis. On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978), EPA announced additional components of the NPL/RCRA policy. Also, additional criteria for determining unwilling- ness were provided on August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30005). In that same Federal Register (53 FR 30002), EPA requested public comment on additional criteria for determining inability to pay for remedial actions. A number of RCRA sites remain proposed pending response to public comments. Four bankrupt sites in Update #7 on which no comments were received in the public comment period are being added to the NPL: o Continental Steel Corp., Kokomo, IN o Pester Refinery Co., El Dorado, KS o Bofors Nobel, Inc., Muskegon, MI o Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc., Glen Cove, NY Federal Facility sites Section 120(a) of SARA requires that Federal facilities be subject to and comply with CERCIA in the same manner as any nongovernmental entity. CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally prohibits use of the Superfund for remedial actions at Federally owned facilities. Prior to the current action, 32 sites were on the Federal section of the final NPL and 30 were proposed, for a total of 62. EPA is adding eight sites to the Federal section of the final NPL, expanding two final Federal -4- ------- facility sites; and ^classifying a final non-Federal site to a Federal facility site. Thus, 41 sites are on the Federal section of the NPL and 22 are proposed. RCRA Policy. In its June 1986 announcement, EPA stated that it would consider at a later date whether its revised policy for deferring non- Faderal RCRA-regulated sites from the NPL should apply to Federal facilities. Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-regulated units within their boundaries, EPA determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result, on May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991), EPA published a policy proposing that Federal facilities should be considered for the NPL regardless of the existence on the facility of units subject to the Subtitle C corrective action authorities of RCRA. The proposed policy was based on several considerations: o Congress clearly intended that Federal facility sites should be on the NPL o Strict application of the non-Federal NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all Federal facility sites from the NPL because they would not likely meet any of the criteria necessary for listing (inability to pay as evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or demonstrated unwillingness to comply with RCRA). o Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the NPL serves the primary purpose of listing Federal facility sites: to advise the public of the status of Federal government cleanup efforts. o Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those sites that present the most serious problem. The policy notice published on March 13, 1989 describes EPA's decision to include on the NPL Federal facility sites that may be subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities and explains a process whereby EPA, the Federal facility, and the State can enter into an Interagency Agreement to define corrective action responsibilities at a site. Of the eight Federal facility sites being added to the NPL, six were reproposed in July 1987 because it appeared that the areas evaluated for the NPL included areas subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA Subtitle C. They are being added in conformance with the Federal NPL/RCRA policy. They are: o Anniston Army Depot (Southeast Industrial Area), Anniston, AL o Dover Air Force Base, Dover, DE o.Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Load-Assembly-Packing Area), Joliet, IL o Savanna Army Depot Activity, Savanna, IL o Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant, Doyline, LA o Letterkenny Army Depot (Property Disposal Office Area), Franklin County, PA -5- ------- The other two Federal facility sites being added to the NFL were part of Update #7 and received no Garments. Expansions/Reclassification. Under the new NPL/RORA policy for Federal facility sites, the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Adams County, 00, is being expanded to include a 93-acre lagoon known as "Basin F." EPA proposed the expansion in July 1987 based on the policy statement published in May 1987. In addition, further investigation indicates that contamination from the Arsenal extends to the Basin F area. In expanding the site to include the Basin F area, EPA will have the option of seeking a comprehensive remedy at the site under CERCLA, consistent with the CERCLA interim response action nearing completion at the site. The second site being expanded is Weldon Spring Quarry (USDOE/Army), St. Charles County, MD, which was placed on the final NPL on July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620). On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23993), EPA proposed to expand the site to include the Weldon Spring Feed Materials Plant and Raffinate Pits, which are located less than 3 miles from the Quarry and are linked to the contamination at the original site. No comments were received on the proposal. The expanded site is now on the Federal section of the final NPL under the name Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army). The site being reclassifed was proposed for the NPL on September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674) as W. R. Grace Co., Inc. -(Wayne Plant), Wayne, NJ. The company bought the facility in 1957 and owned it until September 18, 1984, when it was acquired by the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE). USDOE changed the name of the site to the Wayne Interim Storage Site (WISS). On September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070), the site was placed on the final NPL under its original name. Because of this change in ownership, EPA now considers it a Federal facility site. The site name is being changed to W. R. Grace & Co., Inc./Wayne Interim Storage Site (USDOE) to more accurately reflect the ownership and status of the site. The site has been moved to the Federal section of the final NPL. Special Study Waste Sites Section 105 (g) of CERdA, as amended by SARA, requires additional information before proposing sites with "special study wastes," as defined under RCRA Section 3001(b)(2) [drilling fluids], 3001(b)(3)(A) (ii) [mining wastes], and 300l(b) (3)(A) (iii) [cement kiln dust]. Three sites in proposed Update #7 containing or possibly containing special study wastes received no comments and are being added to the NPL. Also, one final site being expanded contains special study wastes. The sites and the special study wastes involved are: o Gulf Coast Vacuum Services, Abbeville, LA (oil drilling mud and produced waters) o PAB Oil & Chemical Service, Inc., Abbeville, LA (oil drilling mud and produced waters) o Cleveland Mill, Silver City, MM (mining wastes) -6- ------- o Weldon Spring -Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army), St. Charles County, MD (mining wastes from uranium ore processing) Mining Sites EPA's position is that mining wastes may be hazardous substances, pollutants, or ^contaminants under CERCXA and, therefore, mining waste sites are eligible for the NPL. This position was affirmed in 1985 by the United States Court of Appeals. In the past, prior to listing mining sites, EPA has considered whether they might be satisfactorily addressed using State-share monies from the Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMIR) Fund under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). AMLR funds are primarily intended for reclamation and restoration of land and water resources adversely affected by past coal mining. A State may address a noncoal mining site with AMIR monies if it: o Was abandoned prior to August 3, 1977, the enactment date of SMCRA o Is in one of the States (23 at present) without an approved AMIR Fund and — All coal sites have been addressed PX — The Governor of the State declares that the noncoal project is necessary for the protection of public health or safety On December 21, 1988 (53 FR 51394), EPA proposed revisions to the National. Contingency Plan, the Federal regulation by which CERdA is implemented. On February 8, 1989 (54 FR 6153), EPA extended the comment period on the proposal an additional 30 days to March 23, 1989. One revision to the NCP would allow adding noncoal mining sites to the NPL if States choose not to respond under SMCRA. EPA proposed not to list a mining site if all of the following occur: o The site is eligible for AMLR funding. o Sufficient AMLR funds remain to fund the entire response action. o The site is discovered in a State where it was previously thought that all mining projects had been completed and impact assistance (construction of roads, recreation facilities, etc.)had been granted. While comment is being taken on the policy, EPA is including two mining sites in this final rule to avoid delaying CERdA remedial activities. The sites, abandoned prior to the enactment date of SMCRA, are: o Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army), St. Charles County, MO o Cleveland Mill, Silver City, NM -7- ------- Since both Missouri and New Mexico have approved AMLR programs, the sites are potentially eligible for AMLR funds. However, available information indicates the sites will not be addressed using AMLR funds. Name Revisions In addition to renaming of the two Federal facility sites, four Pennsylvania sites being placed on the NFL are being renamed to reflect more accurately the nature and parties responsible for problems at the sites. The sites are: o American Electronics Laboratories, Montgomery Township, becomes North Penn-Area 5 o Gentle Cleaners, Inc./Granite Knitting Mills, Inc., Souderton, becomes North Perm-Area 1 o J. W. Rex Co./Allied Paint Manufacturing Co., Inc./Keystone Hydraulics, Lansdale, becomes North Penn-Area 6 o Spra-Fin, Inc., becomes North Penn-Area 7 HRS Effective Date On December 23, 1988 (53 FR 51962), EPA proposed revisions to the HRS in response to CERCLA Section 105(c)(1), added by SARA, which provides that EPA should revise the HRS "by October 17, 1988 (24 months after the enactment of SARA). On February 8, 1989 (54 FR 6153), EPA extended the comment period on the proposal an additional 30 days to March 23, 1989. Canmenters on NPL rules have argued that the October 17, 1988 date is the effective date for all purposes of Section 105(c)(1), and EPA cannot use the current HRS after that date to add sites to the NPL. The commenters believe that EPA may not resume listing sites until the HRS revisions are proposed and made effective. EPA disagrees with this interpretation for several reasons: o CERCLA Section 105(c)(1) states that until the effective date of the revisions "the hazard ranking system in effect on September 1, 1984, shall continue in full force and effect." This section does not state that there will be no HRS until a revised system is issued and effective, and that no sites may be listed in the interim period. The reference to the continued applicability of the current HRS is not to October 17, 1988, but rather to the effective date established by EPA. EPA has not yet established that date. When Congress has wanted to prescribe specific consequences from failure to take a certain action, it has established "hammer" provisions in other environmental laws. Congress did not do so in the case of the HRS revisions. o The overall goal of CERCLA is to expeditiously list and address problem sites. Congress did not intend to leave EPA without the means to list sites, based simply on a delay in revising a rule, and thereby harm both the public and the goal of protecting health and the environment. -8- ------- o The House/Senate Conference Report on SARA states that the current HRS shall continue in force "until the new regulations are in effect." (emphasis added) o The .report on SARA of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works states that CERCXA Section 105 (c) (1) "is meant to deal with this problem without interfering with continued EPA progress toward assessing potential site hazards, listing sites. or beginning clean-up action. It would not affect any site or facility listed prior to the actual effective date of the new hazard ranking system, nor would it r*3*T"'ne the ranking or listing of any site or facility to be delayed .... [the amendment leaves] the present hazard ranking system in operation until the more accurate hazard ranking system can be put into effect for sites to be listed thereafter.11 (emphasis added). o In the floor debate over the CERCLA amendments, members of Congress made their intent clear: — "To allow the Administrator to continue adding sites while the HRS is being reviewed, the new amendments provide that the current HRS be applied until the effective date of the revised HRS." (statements of Rep. Eckhardt and Sen. Baucas) (emphasis added) "[T]he existing hazard ranking system would continue until the revised system is in place. Thus, the provision should not disrupt progress to clean up existing NPL sites or preclude EPA from listing new sites in the interim until the HRS is revised • as required by section [105] of the bill." (statement of Sen. Baucas) (emphasis added) EPA intends to issue the revised HRS as soon as possible. However, until the proposed system has been subject to public comment and the revised system put into effect, EPA will continue to list sites using the current HRS, in accordance with CERCLA Section 105(c) (1) and Congressional intent. -9- ------- Additional Publications EPA has prepared three additional publications on the NFL actions of March 1989: o "National Priorities List, Supplementary Lists and Supporting Materials, March 1989." Publication HW-10.6S. o "Descriptions of 101 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities List in March 1989." Publication HW-8.15. o "Descriptions of 273 Sites Proposed for the National Priorities List as of March 1989." The descriptions have been compiled into one document as a convenience. Publication HW-8.16. For a single free copy of any of these documents, contact EPA's Public Information Center (PIC), PM-211B, 401 M St., SW, Washington, DC 20460, telephone 202-382-2080. Descriptions of all proposed and final NPL sites are now contained in four documents: HW-8.15 and 8.16 (just issued) plus these two previously issued documents: o "Descriptions of 272 Sites Placed on the Final NPL in 1985-87." Previously, these sites were available in two documents. They have been compiled into one document as a convenience. Publication HW-8.10/8.11. Available from'PIC. o Descriptions of 538 sites placed on the final NPL in 1983-84: "Hazardous Waste Sites: Descriptions of Sites on Current National Priorities List, October 1984." Publication HW-8.5, available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, telephone 703-487-4650. Accession No. PB85-224756. Cost is $49.95 per copy, $6.95 in microfiche, plus $3 handling fee per order. Publications HW-10.3, 10.3S, 8.12, 8.13, and 8.14 are obsolete and may be discarded. -10- ------- National Priorities List, New Final Sites (by State) March 1989 NPL Rank 754 823 835 551 199 702 327 471 652 758 386 214 611 259 350 324 667 559 720 510 351 612 368 321 791 459 631 1: V F D |-: : " 0 C St Site Name AK Alaska Battery Enterprises AR Arkwood, Inc. CA Modesto Ground Water Contamin CA Newmark Ground Water Contamin CA Southern Calif Edison (Visalia) CA Valley Wood Preserving, Inc. CT Nutmeg Valley Road FL Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc. GA Cedartown Municipal Landfill GA Mathis Bros Lf (S Marble Top Rd) GA T.H. Agricul & Nutri (Albany) IA Mid-America Tanning Co. IA Red Oak City Landfill IL Interstate Pollution Control, Inc IL Southeast Rockford Grnd Wtr Con IL Tri-County Lf/Waste Mgrat Illinois IL Yeoman Creek Landfill IN Carter Lee Lumber Co. IN Continental Steel Corp. IN Douglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc., Lf IN Galen Myers Dump/Drum Salvage IN Lakeland Disposal Service, Inc. IN Southside Sanitary Landfill KS Hydro -Flex Inc. KS Pester Refinery Co. KY Red Penn Sanitation Co. Landfill KY Tri-City Disposal Co. = Voluntary or negotiated response R = Federal enforcement S = Category to be determined = Implementation activity underway, one = One or more operable units completed; = Implementation activity completed for Response Cleanup City/County Category.. Status- Fairbanks N Star Bor R I Omaha V F S 0 Modesto D San Bernardino D Visalia V S 0 Turlock V S Wolcott D Pompano Beach D Cedartown D Kensington D Albany D I Sergeant Bluff D Red Oak R l' Rockford D • Rockford D South Elgin R Waukegan D Indianapolis D Kokomo D Mishawaka D Osceola R 0 Claypool D Indianapolis V S Topeka D El Dorado S Peewee Valley D Shepherdsville R 0 = Federal and State response = State enforcement or more operable units others may be underway all operable units -11- ------- National Priorities List, New Final Sites (by State) March 1989 NPL Rank 323 435 404 804 59 129 480 669 726 734 820 137 399 371 432 819 St LA LA MD MI MI MI MI MI MI MI NC NC NC NC NC NC Site Name Gulf Coast Vacuum Services PAB Oil & Chemical Service, Inc. Bush Valley Landfill Adam's Plating American Anodco, Inc. Bofors Nobel, Inc. Carter Industrials, Inc. Folkertsma Refuse J & L Landfill Parsons Chemical Works, Inc. ABC One Hour Cleaners Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps FCX, Inc. (Washington Plant) Koppers Co Inc (Morrisville Pint) New Hanover Cnty Airport Burn Pit Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits City/County Abbeville Abbeville Abingdon Lansing Ionia Muskegon Detroit Grand Rapids Rochester Hills Grand Ledge Jacksonville Aberdeen Washington Morrisville Wilmington Maco Response Cleanup Category.. Status^ D D D D V S R S R D R D D V R S F D D R 0 0 I 0 660 ND ' Minot Landfill 560 NH Fletcher's Paint Works & Storage 706 NH Holton Circle Ground Water Contam 830 NJ Garden State Cleaners Co. 260 NJ Global Sanitary Landfill. 775 NJ Higgins Farm 686 NJ Industrial Latex Corp. 848 NJ Kauffman & Minteer, Inc. 829 NJ Pohatcong Valley Ground Water Con 400 NM Cleveland Mill 587 NY Action Anodizing,Plating Polish 675 NY BioClinical Laboratories, Inc. 572 NY C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump 115 NY Circuitron Corp. 620 NY Conklin Dumps 664 NY Islip Municipal Sanitary Landfill 717 NY Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc. 165 NY Rosen Brothers Scrap Yard/Dump 813 NY Sidney Landfill 812 NY Warwick Landfill 461 OH TRW, Inc. (Minerva Plant) Minot Milford Londonderry Minotola Old Bridge Township Franklin Township Wallington Borough Jobstown Warren CounCy Silver City Copiague Bohemia Hamilton East Farmingdale Conklin Islip Glen Cove Cortland Sidney Warwick Minerva R R . D D D D 0 0 V R R D D D D D D D 0 0 V -12- ------- National Priorities List, New Final Sites (by State) March 1989 NPL Rank 757 766 681 795 417 703 381 822 155 539 542 541 540 765 731 730 521 177 790 427 643 778 194 138 476 477 213 94 265 St OK OK OR PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA SC SC TN TX TX TX VA VA VT VT WA WA WI WI WI Site Name Double Eagle Refinery Co. Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery Joseph Forest Products Berkley Products Co. Dump Hoarhead Farms Butz Landfill Delta Quarries/Stotler Landfill Elizabethtown Landfill Hellertown Manufacturing Co. North Penn - Area 1 North Penn - Area 5 North Penn - Area 6 North Penn - Area 7 Strasburg Landfill Elmore Waste Disposal Medley Farm Drum Dump Wrigley Charcoal Plant Brio Refining, Inc. Sheridan Disposal Services Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers H & H Inc. , Burn Pit Rentokil, Inc. (VA Wood Pres Div) Bennington Municipal Sanitary Lfl Burgess Brothers Landfill Hidden Valley Lndfl (Thun Field) Yakima Plating Co. Hechimovich Sanitary Landfill N.W. Mauthe Co., Inc. * Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill Response Cleanup City/County Category.. Status. Oklahoma City D Oklahoma City D Joseph D Denver D Bridgeton Township D Stroudsburg D Antis/Logan Twps V F S Elizabethtown D Hellertown V F Souderton R Montgomery Township R Lansdale R North Wales R Newlin Township S Greer R Gaffney V R F Wrigley R Friendswood V F Hemps tead V F Houston V R F S Farrington . R Richmond V F Bennington D Woodford . D Pierce County V S Yakima D Williamstown D Appleton R S Tomah D 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 Number of New Final Sites: 93 -13- ------- NPL National Priorities List, Federal Facility Sites, New Final (by State) March 1989 Response Cleanup Grl 4 11 12 8 16 1 10 15 St AL DE IL IL LA NM PA WA Site Name Anniston Army Depot (SE Ind Area) Dover Air Force Base Joliet Army Ammu Plant (LAP Area) Savanna Army Depot Activity Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant Cal West Metals (USSBA) Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area) Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Areas) City/County Anniston Dover Joliet Savanna Doyline Lemitar Franklin County Spokane County Category- Status. R .1 R I R R R D R R Number of New Final Federal Facility Sites: 8 -14- ------- National Priorities List, Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory (by New Final Sites) March 1989 New Final State/Territory Pennsylvania New York Michigan Illinois Indiana New Jersey North Carolina California Georgia Louisiana Texas Washington Wisconsin Iowa Kansas Kentucky New Hampshire New Mexico Oklahoma South Carolina Vermont Virginia A I abama Alaska Arkansas Connecticut Delaware Florida Maryland North Dakota Ohio Oregon Tennessee American Samoa Arizona Colorado Commonwealth of Marianas District of Columbia Guam Hawai i Idaho Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Dakota Trust Territories Utah Virgin Islands West Virginia Wyoming Non-Fed 11 10 7 4 6 6 6 4 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fed 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 ' 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Final Non- Fed 69 72 65 19 30 97 15 44 6 8 23 21 35 9 9 12 15 5 7 14 4 11 8 1 10 8 11 32 7 2 29 5 9 0 5 12 0 0 1 0 4 5 21 39 2 12 8 2 0 8 8 1 0 3 0 5 1 Fed 2 1 0 4 0 3 0 8 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Total Proposed Non- Fed 23 3 15 16 7 6 5 33 6 2 3 10 4 14 2 5 0 3 3 7 4 9 2 0 0 6 8 15 1 0 2 .1 3 0 3 2 0 0 0 6 0 2 1 0 1 7 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 Fed 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Total 95 76 80 39 37 107 21 88 13 11 28 42 39 23 11 17 15 10 11 21 8 21 12 1 10 14 20 47 10 2 .32 7 13 0 9 16 0 0 1 6 4 8 22 40 3 21 10 5 0 9 9 1 0 10 0 6 2 Total 93 849 41 251 22 1163 -15- ------- U.S. Environmental Protection \ .-..••.itw U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Offices For further information, call the Superfund Hotline, toll-free at 1-800-424-9346 or 382-3000 in Washington, DC, metropolitan area, or the Superfund Offices listed below Headquarters Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OS-230) 401 M Street. S.W. Washington. DC 20460 CML: (202)475-8103 FTS: 475-8103 Region 1 Waste Management Division. HAA-CAN 2 John F. Kennedy Building Boston. MA 02203 CML: (617) 573-5700 FTS: 833-1700 Region 2 Emergency & Remedial Response Division 26 Federal Plaza New York.'NY 10278 CML: (212) 264-8672 FTS: 264-8672 Region 3 Hazardous'Waste Management Division. 3HWOO 841 Chestnut Building Philadelphia. PA 19107 CML: (215) 597-8131 FTS: 597-8131 Region 4 Waste Management Division 345 Courtland Street. NE Atlanta. GA 30365 CML: (404) 347-3454 FTS: 257-3454 Region 5 Waste Management Division. 5HS-12 230 South Dearborn Street. 12th Floor Chicago. IL 60604 CML: (312)886-7579 FTS: 886-7579 Region 6 Hazardous Waste Management Division. 6H 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas. TX 75202-2733 CML: (214) 655-6700 FTS: 255-6700 Region 7 Waste Management Division 726. Minnesota Avenue Kansas City. KS66101 CML: (913) 236-2850 FTS: 757-2850 Region 8 Hazardous Waste Management Division. 8HWM 999 18th Street. Suite 500 . Denver. CO 80202-2405 CML: (303) 293-1720 FTS: 564-1720 Region 9 Toxics & Waste Management Division, T-1 215 Fremont Street San Francisco. CA 94105 CML: (415)974-7460 FTS: 454-7460 Region 10 Hazardous Waste Division. HW-111 1200 6th Avenue Seattle. WA98101 CML: (206)442-1906 FTS: 399-1906 ------- |