United States  '              Office of Errergencv &
              6 nvironmental Protection         Remediai Resoonse
              Agency                    Washington, DC 20460                   HW—10.6
                          BACKGROUND mPORMATICN:
                      PRIORITIES LIST, FINAL RULES, MARCH 1989


     The U.S. EnviTOTnrental Protection Agency  (EPA) is adding 101 sites,
(including 8 Federal facility sites) to the National Priorities List (NPL),
expanding 2 already final Federal facility sites, and reclassifying another
final site as a Federal facility site.  Eight  sites have been deleted from
the NPL since the June 1988 rule, resulting in a  final NPL of 890 sites,
of which 41 are in the Federal section.  Four  proposed sites are being
dropped from further consideration, leaving 273 sites proposed  for the NPL,
of which 22 are in the Federal section.  Final and proposed sites total
1,163.

     These actions are published in three Federal Register notices;  One,
published March 13, 1989  (54 FR 10512) is devoted to Federal facility sites.
A second notice, also published on March 13  (54 FR 10520), announces a
policy for listing certain types of Federal facility sites.  The third
notice, published in late March, adds new sites to the NPL.

     The two rules include new final sites from 33 of the 50 States, the
District of Columbia/" and 6 Territories.  Pennsylvania  leads with 12 new
final sites, followed by New York with 10 and  Michigan with 7.

     Of the States and Territories, seven have no sites on the new final
NPL:  American Samoa, Ccmnonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the
District of Columbia, Hawaii, Nevada, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands,
and the Virgin Islands.  New Jersey has the  largest number of final sites
(100), followed by New York  (73), Pennsylvania (71), Michigan (65), and
California  (52).

     The NPL identifies abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites
that warrant further investigation to determine  if remediai response is
necessary.  Sites on the NPL are eligible  for long-term remedial action
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,  Compensation, and Liability
Act  (CERCIA), enacted on  December 11,  1980,  as amended by the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act  (SARA), enacted on  October 17, 1986.
SARA authorized a "Hazardous Substances Superfund" totalling $8.5 billion
over 5 years to pay costs not assumed by responsible parties for cleaning
up waste sites.   (CERCIA  authorized  $1.5 billion over 5 years.)  EPA has
the primary responsibility  for managing site investigation, cleanup, and
enforcement  activities under Superfund.

     This document provides background information on these actions and the
 "ollowing lists:
 «,
     o The  101 new  final  sites being added to the NPL arranged
       alphabetically by  State  (page 11).

     o The distribution of  all  sites by State arranged by the
       number of new final  sites  (page 15).

                                     -1-

-------
Contents of Rule

     All but one of the 101 sites are being added to the NFL because they
have scores of 28.50 or above on the Hazard Ranking System  (HRS), a numerically
based system designed to evaluate the relative risks posed by a  site to
human health or the environment.

     Each State may designate a single site as its top priority.  Such
sites do not require an HRS score of 28.50 or above.  Wisconsin's top-
priority site, N.W. Mauthe Co. in Appleton, is among the new final sites.
Its HRS score is below 28.50.

     The new final sites were in several proposed rules:
o
o
o
o
o
o
Update
Update
Update
Update
Update
Update
#2:
#3:
#4:
#5
#6
#7
6
2
2
15
12
64
     Update #7, proposed on June 24, 1988, consisted of 229 sities, including
14 Federal facility sites.  The formal comment period closed on August 23, 1988.
Of the 229, 64 received no comments and are being added to the NPL.

     The 273 sites remaining in proposed status can be grouped in this way:

                                          Sites   Federal facility sites   Total

Update #1  (Sept. 8, 1983, 48 FR 40674)       20                  2
Update #2  (Oct. 15, 1984, 49 FR 40320)      41            4                 45
Update #3  (April 10, 1985, 50 FR 14115)      62                  8
Update #4  (Sept. 18, 1985, 50 FR 37950)     11            2  .               13
Update #5  (June 10, 1986, 51 FR 21099)      11            2                 13
Update #6  (Jan. 22, 1987, 52 FR 2492)       27            0                 27
Update #7  (June 24, 1988, 53 FR 23988)     153           12                165
                                           251           22                273

     The sites remain proposed pending completion of review of comments or
resolution of technical or policy issues.  All proposed sites will be considered
for listing in future final rules.

Deletion of Final Sites

     At the time of the NPL rulemaking of June 1988, 799 sites were on the
final NPL.  Since then, 10 sites have been deleted because EPA and the
State determined that all appropriate response has been taken:

     o September 1, 1988^(53 FR 33811)

       - Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc., Tampa, FL
                                    -2-

-------
       - Varsol Spill (once listed as part of the Biscayne Aquifer),
         Miami, FL

     o December 23, 1988 (53 FR 51780)

       - Toftdahl Drums, Brush Prairie, WA

     o January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2124)

       - Matthews Electroplating,  Roanoke County, VA

     o February 13, 1989 (54 FR 6521)

       - Presque Isle, Erie, PA

     o February 21, 1989 (54 FR 7424)

       - Parramore Surplus, Mount Pleasant, FL

     o February 22, 1989 (54 FR 7548/7549)

       - Cooper Road, Voorhees Township, NJ

       - Krysowaty Farm, Hillsborough, NJ

     o March 17, 1989 (54 FR 11203)

       - New Castle Steel, New Castle County, DE

     O March 22, 1989 (54 FR 11949)

       - Wade  (ABM), once listed as ABM-Wade, Chester, PA

Proposed sites Dropped From Further Consideration

     EPA revised the HRS scores for 17 of the new final sites based
on its review of comments and additional information.  In four cases,
scores dropped below the cutoff of 28.50.  Accordingly, these four sites
are being dropped from the proposed NPL at this time:

     o Montco Research Products, Inc., Hollister, FL

     o E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (Montague Plant)
       Montague, MI

     o Horstmann's Dump, East Hanover, NJ

     o Olson Neihart Reservoir, Wasatch-County, UT

RCRA-Related Sites

     When the first final NPL was promulgated in September 1983, EPA
announced certain listing policies relating to sites that might qualify
for the NPL.  One of these policies involved facilities subject to Subtitle

-------
C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA).  EPA's policy was
generally to defer from the NPL, RCRA "regulated units"  (that is, land
disposal units that received hazardous waste after the effective date of
the RCRA land disposal regulations).

     In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments were
enacted, expanding EPA's authority to require corrective measures under
Subtitle C.  As a result of this broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised
its policy for placing RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June 10,
1986,  (54 FR 21109) announced three major components of a final RCRA
policy.  Specifically, EPA announced that facilities subject to Subtitle
C correction action authorities of RCRA would not be deferred but would
be placed on the NPL if one or more of these conditions exist:

     o Ihe facilities are owned by persons who have demonstrated inability
       to finance appropriate remedial action by invoking bankruptcy laws.

     o The facilities have lost authorization to operate, and there are
       additional indications that the owner or operator is unwilling
       to undertake corrective action.

     o The facilities have not lost authorization to operate but have a
       clear history of unwillingness.  These situations are determined
       on a case-by-case basis.

     On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978), EPA announced additional components
of the NPL/RCRA policy.  Also, additional criteria for determining unwilling-
ness were provided on August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30005).  In that same Federal
Register (53 FR 30002), EPA requested public comment on additional criteria
for determining inability to pay for remedial actions.  A number of RCRA
sites remain proposed pending response to public comments.

     Four bankrupt sites in Update #7 on which no comments were received
in the public comment period are being added to the NPL:

     o Continental Steel Corp., Kokomo, IN

     o Pester Refinery Co., El Dorado, KS

     o Bofors Nobel, Inc., Muskegon, MI

     o Mattiace Petrochemical Co., Inc., Glen Cove, NY

Federal Facility sites

     Section 120(a) of SARA requires that Federal facilities be subject to
and comply with CERCIA in the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally prohibits use of the
Superfund for remedial actions at Federally owned facilities.

     Prior to the current action, 32 sites were on the Federal section of
the final NPL and 30 were proposed, for a total of 62.  EPA is adding eight
sites to the Federal section of the final NPL, expanding two final Federal
                                   -4-

-------
facility sites; and ^classifying a final non-Federal site to a Federal
facility site.  Thus, 41 sites are on the Federal section of the NPL and
22 are proposed.

     RCRA Policy.  In its June 1986 announcement, EPA stated that it
would consider at a later date whether its revised policy for deferring non-
Faderal RCRA-regulated sites from the NPL should apply to Federal facilities.

     Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-regulated units within
their boundaries, EPA determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities.  As a result, on May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991),
EPA published a policy proposing that Federal facilities should be considered
for the NPL regardless of the existence on the facility of units subject
to the Subtitle C corrective action authorities of RCRA.  The proposed
policy was based on several considerations:

     o Congress clearly intended that Federal facility sites should be
       on the NPL

     o Strict application of the non-Federal NPL/RCRA policy would
       exclude virtually all Federal facility sites from the NPL because
       they would not likely meet any of the criteria necessary for
       listing  (inability to pay as evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy
       laws or demonstrated unwillingness to comply with RCRA).

     o Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the NPL serves the primary
       purpose of listing Federal facility sites:  to advise the public
       of the status of Federal government cleanup efforts.

     o Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set priorities and focus
       cleanup efforts on those sites that present the most serious problem.

     The policy notice published on March 13, 1989 describes EPA's
decision to include on the NPL Federal facility sites that may be subject
to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities and explains a process
whereby EPA, the Federal facility, and the State can enter into an
Interagency Agreement to define corrective action responsibilities at a
site.

     Of the eight Federal facility sites being added to the NPL, six were
reproposed in July 1987 because it appeared that the areas evaluated for
the NPL included areas subject to the corrective action authorities of
RCRA Subtitle C.  They are being added in conformance with the Federal
NPL/RCRA policy.  They are:

     o Anniston Army Depot  (Southeast Industrial Area), Anniston, AL
     o Dover Air Force Base, Dover, DE
     o.Joliet Army Ammunition Plant  (Load-Assembly-Packing Area),
         Joliet, IL
     o Savanna Army Depot Activity, Savanna, IL
     o Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant, Doyline, LA
     o Letterkenny Army Depot  (Property Disposal Office Area),
         Franklin County, PA
                                   -5-

-------
     The other two Federal facility sites being added to the NFL were
part of Update #7 and received no Garments.

     Expansions/Reclassification.  Under the new NPL/RORA policy for
Federal facility sites, the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Adams County, 00,
is being expanded to include a 93-acre lagoon known as "Basin F."  EPA
proposed the expansion in July 1987 based on the policy statement published
in May 1987.

     In addition, further investigation indicates that contamination from
the Arsenal extends to the Basin F area.  In expanding the site to include
the Basin F area, EPA will have the option of seeking a comprehensive
remedy at the site under CERCLA, consistent with the CERCLA interim response
action nearing completion at the site.

     The second site being expanded is Weldon Spring Quarry (USDOE/Army),
St. Charles County, MD, which was placed on the final NPL on July 22,
1987 (52 FR 27620).  On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23993), EPA proposed to expand
the site to include the Weldon Spring Feed Materials Plant and Raffinate
Pits, which are located less than 3 miles from the Quarry and are linked
to the contamination at the original site.  No comments were received on
the proposal.  The expanded site is now on the Federal section of the
final NPL under the name Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army).

     The site being reclassifed was proposed for the NPL on September 8,
1983 (48 FR 40674) as W. R. Grace Co., Inc. -(Wayne Plant), Wayne, NJ.
The company bought the facility in 1957 and owned it until September 18,
1984, when it was acquired by the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE).
USDOE changed the name of the site to the Wayne Interim Storage Site
(WISS).  On September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070), the site was placed on the
final NPL under its original name.  Because of this change in ownership,
EPA now considers it a Federal facility site.  The site name is being
changed to W. R. Grace & Co., Inc./Wayne Interim Storage Site (USDOE) to
more accurately reflect the ownership and status of the site.  The site
has been moved to the Federal section of the final NPL.

Special Study Waste Sites

     Section 105 (g) of CERdA, as amended by SARA, requires additional
information before proposing sites with "special study wastes," as defined
under RCRA Section 3001(b)(2) [drilling fluids], 3001(b)(3)(A) (ii) [mining
wastes], and 300l(b) (3)(A) (iii)  [cement kiln dust].  Three sites in
proposed Update #7 containing or possibly containing special study wastes
received no comments and are being added to the NPL.  Also, one final
site being expanded contains special study wastes.  The sites and the
special study wastes involved are:

     o Gulf Coast Vacuum Services, Abbeville, LA (oil drilling mud
       and produced waters)

     o PAB Oil & Chemical Service, Inc., Abbeville, LA (oil
       drilling mud and produced waters)

     o Cleveland Mill, Silver City, MM (mining wastes)

                                   -6-

-------
     o Weldon Spring -Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army),  St. Charles
       County, MD (mining wastes from uranium ore processing)

Mining Sites

     EPA's position is that mining wastes may be hazardous substances,
pollutants, or ^contaminants under CERCXA and, therefore, mining waste
sites are eligible for the NPL.  This position was affirmed in 1985 by
the United States Court of Appeals.

     In the past, prior to listing mining sites, EPA has considered
whether they might be satisfactorily addressed using State-share monies
from the Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMIR) Fund under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA).  AMLR funds are
primarily intended for reclamation and restoration of land and water
resources adversely affected by past coal mining.  A State may address a
noncoal mining site with AMIR monies if it:

     o Was abandoned prior to August 3, 1977, the enactment date of SMCRA
     o Is in one of the States (23 at present) without an approved AMIR
       Fund and

       — All coal sites have been addressed
                         PX
       — The Governor of the State declares that the noncoal project
          is necessary for the protection of public health or safety

     On December 21, 1988 (53 FR 51394), EPA proposed revisions to the
National. Contingency Plan, the Federal regulation by which CERdA is
implemented.  On February 8, 1989  (54 FR 6153), EPA extended the comment
period on the proposal an additional 30 days to March 23, 1989.
One revision to the NCP would allow adding noncoal mining sites to
the NPL if States choose not to respond under SMCRA.  EPA proposed not to
list a mining site if all of the following occur:

     o The site is eligible for AMLR funding.

     o Sufficient AMLR funds remain to fund the entire response action.

     o The site is discovered in a State where it was previously thought
       that all mining projects had been completed and impact assistance
       (construction of roads, recreation facilities, etc.)had been
       granted.

     While comment is being taken on the policy, EPA is including two
mining sites in this final rule to avoid delaying  CERdA remedial
activities.  The sites, abandoned prior to the enactment date of SMCRA,
are:

     o Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE/Army), St. Charles County, MO

     o Cleveland Mill, Silver City, NM
                                   -7-

-------
     Since both Missouri and New Mexico have approved AMLR programs, the
sites are potentially eligible for AMLR funds.  However, available information
indicates the sites will not be addressed using AMLR funds.

Name Revisions

     In addition to renaming of the two Federal facility sites, four
Pennsylvania sites being placed on the NFL are being renamed to reflect
more accurately the nature and parties responsible for problems at the
sites.  The sites are:

     o American Electronics Laboratories, Montgomery Township, becomes
       North Penn-Area 5

     o Gentle Cleaners, Inc./Granite Knitting Mills, Inc., Souderton,
       becomes North Perm-Area 1

     o J. W. Rex Co./Allied Paint Manufacturing Co., Inc./Keystone Hydraulics,
       Lansdale, becomes North Penn-Area 6

     o Spra-Fin, Inc., becomes North Penn-Area 7

HRS Effective Date

     On December 23, 1988 (53 FR 51962), EPA proposed revisions to the HRS in
response to CERCLA Section 105(c)(1), added by SARA, which provides that
EPA should revise the HRS "by October 17, 1988 (24 months after the enactment
of SARA).  On February 8, 1989 (54 FR 6153), EPA extended the comment period
on the proposal an additional 30 days to March 23, 1989.

     Canmenters on NPL rules have argued that the October 17, 1988
date is the effective date for all purposes of Section 105(c)(1), and EPA
cannot use the current HRS after that date to add sites to the NPL.  The
commenters believe that EPA may not resume listing sites until the HRS
revisions are proposed and made effective.  EPA disagrees with this
interpretation for several reasons:

     o CERCLA Section 105(c)(1)  states that until the effective date of
       the revisions "the hazard ranking system in effect on September 1,
       1984, shall continue in full force and effect."  This section
       does not state that there will be no HRS until a revised system is
       issued and effective, and that no sites may be listed in the
       interim period.  The reference to the continued applicability of
       the current HRS is not to October 17, 1988, but rather to the
       effective date established by EPA.  EPA has not yet established
       that date.  When Congress has wanted to prescribe specific
       consequences from failure to take a certain action, it has
       established "hammer" provisions in other environmental laws.
       Congress did not do so in the case of the HRS revisions.

     o The overall goal of CERCLA is to expeditiously list and address
       problem sites.  Congress did not intend to leave EPA without the
       means to list sites,  based simply on a delay in revising a rule,
       and thereby harm both the public and the goal of protecting health
       and the environment.

                                   -8-

-------
     o The House/Senate Conference Report on SARA states that the current
       HRS shall continue in force "until the new regulations are in
       effect." (emphasis added)

     o The .report on SARA of the Senate Committee on Environment and
       Public Works states that CERCXA Section 105 (c) (1) "is meant to
       deal with this problem without interfering with continued EPA
       progress toward assessing potential site hazards, listing sites.
       or beginning clean-up action.  It would not affect any site or
       facility listed prior to the actual effective date of the new
       hazard ranking system, nor would it r*3*T"'ne the ranking or listing
       of any site or facility to be delayed .... [the amendment leaves]
       the present hazard ranking system in operation until the more
       accurate hazard ranking system can be put into effect for sites to
       be listed thereafter.11   (emphasis added).

     o In the floor debate over the CERCLA amendments, members of
       Congress made their intent clear:

       — "To allow the Administrator to continue adding sites while the
          HRS is being reviewed, the new amendments provide that the
          current HRS be applied until the effective date of the revised
          HRS."  (statements of Rep. Eckhardt and Sen. Baucas)
          (emphasis added)

          "[T]he existing hazard ranking system would continue until the
          revised system is in place.  Thus, the provision should not
          disrupt progress to clean up existing NPL sites or preclude EPA
          from listing new sites in the interim until the HRS is revised   •
          as required by section [105] of the bill."  (statement of Sen.
          Baucas) (emphasis added)

     EPA intends to issue the revised HRS as soon as possible.  However,
until the proposed system has been subject to public comment and the revised
system put into effect, EPA will continue to list sites using the current
HRS, in accordance with CERCLA Section 105(c) (1) and Congressional intent.
                                   -9-

-------
Additional Publications

     EPA has prepared three additional publications on the NFL actions of
March 1989:

     o "National Priorities List, Supplementary Lists and
       Supporting Materials, March 1989."  Publication HW-10.6S.

     o "Descriptions of 101 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities
       List in March 1989."  Publication HW-8.15.

     o "Descriptions of 273 Sites Proposed for the National Priorities
       List as of March 1989."  The descriptions have been compiled into
       one document as a convenience.  Publication HW-8.16.

     For a single free copy of any of these documents, contact EPA's
Public Information Center  (PIC), PM-211B, 401 M St., SW, Washington,
DC  20460, telephone 202-382-2080.

     Descriptions of all proposed and final NPL sites are now contained
in four documents:  HW-8.15 and 8.16 (just issued) plus these two previously
issued documents:

     o "Descriptions of 272 Sites Placed on the Final NPL in 1985-87."
       Previously, these sites were available in two documents.  They
       have been compiled into one document as a convenience.  Publication
       HW-8.10/8.11.  Available from'PIC.

     o Descriptions of 538 sites placed on the final NPL in 1983-84:
       "Hazardous Waste Sites:  Descriptions of Sites on Current National
       Priorities List, October 1984."  Publication HW-8.5, available from
       the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA  22161,
       telephone 703-487-4650.  Accession No. PB85-224756.  Cost is $49.95
       per copy, $6.95 in microfiche, plus $3 handling fee per order.

     Publications HW-10.3, 10.3S, 8.12, 8.13, and 8.14 are obsolete and may
be discarded.
                                   -10-

-------
 National Priorities List,
New Final Sites (by State)
       March 1989
NPL
Rank
754
823
835
551
199
702
327
471
652
758
386
214
611
259
350
324
667
559
720
510
351
612
368
321
791
459
631
1: V
F
D
|-: :
" 0
C
St Site Name
AK Alaska Battery Enterprises
AR Arkwood, Inc.
CA Modesto Ground Water Contamin
CA Newmark Ground Water Contamin
CA Southern Calif Edison (Visalia)
CA Valley Wood Preserving, Inc.
CT Nutmeg Valley Road
FL Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc.
GA Cedartown Municipal Landfill
GA Mathis Bros Lf (S Marble Top Rd)
GA T.H. Agricul & Nutri (Albany)
IA Mid-America Tanning Co.
IA Red Oak City Landfill
IL Interstate Pollution Control, Inc
IL Southeast Rockford Grnd Wtr Con
IL Tri-County Lf/Waste Mgrat Illinois
IL Yeoman Creek Landfill
IN Carter Lee Lumber Co.
IN Continental Steel Corp.
IN Douglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc., Lf
IN Galen Myers Dump/Drum Salvage
IN Lakeland Disposal Service, Inc.
IN Southside Sanitary Landfill
KS Hydro -Flex Inc.
KS Pester Refinery Co.
KY Red Penn Sanitation Co. Landfill
KY Tri-City Disposal Co.
= Voluntary or negotiated response R
= Federal enforcement S
= Category to be determined
= Implementation activity underway, one
= One or more operable units completed;
= Implementation activity completed for
Response Cleanup
City/County Category.. Status-
Fairbanks N Star Bor R I
Omaha V F S 0
Modesto D
San Bernardino D
Visalia V S 0
Turlock V S
Wolcott D
Pompano Beach D
Cedartown D
Kensington D
Albany D I
Sergeant Bluff D
Red Oak R l'
Rockford D •
Rockford D
South Elgin R
Waukegan D
Indianapolis D
Kokomo D
Mishawaka D
Osceola R 0
Claypool D
Indianapolis V S
Topeka D
El Dorado S
Peewee Valley D
Shepherdsville R 0
= Federal and State response
= State enforcement

or more operable units
others may be underway
all operable units
        -11-

-------
                                 National Priorities List,
                                New Final Sites (by State)
                                       March 1989
NPL
Rank
323
435
404
804
59
129
480
669
726
734
820
137
399
371
432
819
St
LA
LA
MD
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Site Name
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services
PAB Oil & Chemical Service, Inc.
Bush Valley Landfill
Adam's Plating
American Anodco, Inc.
Bofors Nobel, Inc.
Carter Industrials, Inc.
Folkertsma Refuse
J & L Landfill
Parsons Chemical Works, Inc.
ABC One Hour Cleaners
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps
FCX, Inc. (Washington Plant)
Koppers Co Inc (Morrisville Pint)
New Hanover Cnty Airport Burn Pit
Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits
City/County
Abbeville
Abbeville
Abingdon
Lansing
Ionia
Muskegon
Detroit
Grand Rapids
Rochester Hills
Grand Ledge
Jacksonville
Aberdeen
Washington
Morrisville
Wilmington
Maco
Response Cleanup
Category.. Status^
D
D
D
D
V S
R S
R
D
R
D
D
V R S
F
D
D
R






0




0

I

0
660  ND '  Minot Landfill

560  NH   Fletcher's Paint Works & Storage
706  NH   Holton Circle Ground Water Contam

830  NJ   Garden State Cleaners Co.
260  NJ   Global Sanitary Landfill.
775  NJ   Higgins Farm
686  NJ   Industrial Latex Corp.
848  NJ   Kauffman & Minteer, Inc.
829  NJ   Pohatcong Valley Ground Water Con

400  NM   Cleveland Mill

587  NY   Action Anodizing,Plating Polish
675  NY   BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
572  NY   C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump
115  NY   Circuitron Corp.
620  NY   Conklin Dumps
664  NY   Islip Municipal Sanitary Landfill
717  NY   Mattiace Petrochemical Co.,  Inc.
165  NY   Rosen Brothers Scrap Yard/Dump
813  NY   Sidney Landfill
812  NY   Warwick Landfill

461  OH   TRW, Inc. (Minerva Plant)
Minot

Milford
Londonderry

Minotola
Old Bridge Township
Franklin Township
Wallington Borough
Jobstown
Warren CounCy

Silver City

Copiague
Bohemia
Hamilton
East Farmingdale
Conklin
Islip
Glen Cove
Cortland
Sidney
Warwick

Minerva


R
R


. D
D


D
D


0
0


V
  R
  R
        D
        D
        D
        D
        D
        D
        D
0
0
V
                                          -12-

-------
                                 National Priorities List,
                                New Final Sites (by State)
                                       March 1989
NPL
Rank
757
766
681
795
417
703
381
822
155
539
542
541
540
765
731
730
521
177
790
427
643
778
194
138
476
477
213
94
265
St
OK
OK
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
SC
TN
TX
TX
TX
VA
VA
VT
VT
WA
WA
WI
WI
WI
Site Name
Double Eagle Refinery Co.
Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery
Joseph Forest Products
Berkley Products Co. Dump
Hoarhead Farms
Butz Landfill
Delta Quarries/Stotler Landfill
Elizabethtown Landfill
Hellertown Manufacturing Co.
North Penn - Area 1
North Penn - Area 5
North Penn - Area 6
North Penn - Area 7
Strasburg Landfill
Elmore Waste Disposal
Medley Farm Drum Dump
Wrigley Charcoal Plant
Brio Refining, Inc.
Sheridan Disposal Services
Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers
H & H Inc. , Burn Pit
Rentokil, Inc. (VA Wood Pres Div)
Bennington Municipal Sanitary Lfl
Burgess Brothers Landfill
Hidden Valley Lndfl (Thun Field)
Yakima Plating Co.
Hechimovich Sanitary Landfill
N.W. Mauthe Co., Inc. *
Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill
Response Cleanup
City/County Category.. Status.
Oklahoma City D
Oklahoma City D
Joseph D
Denver D
Bridgeton Township D
Stroudsburg D
Antis/Logan Twps V F S
Elizabethtown D
Hellertown V F
Souderton R
Montgomery Township R
Lansdale R
North Wales R
Newlin Township S
Greer R
Gaffney V R F
Wrigley R
Friendswood V F
Hemps tead V F
Houston V R F S
Farrington . R
Richmond V F
Bennington D
Woodford . D
Pierce County V S
Yakima D
Williamstown D
Appleton R S
Tomah D


0



0
0
0
0
0
I



0
Number of New Final Sites:
93
                                          -13-

-------
NPL
                               National Priorities List,
                     Federal Facility Sites, New Final  (by State)
                                   March 1989
Response   Cleanup
Grl
4
11
12
8
16
1
10
15
St
AL
DE
IL
IL
LA
NM
PA
WA
Site Name
Anniston Army Depot (SE Ind Area)
Dover Air Force Base
Joliet Army Ammu Plant (LAP Area)
Savanna Army Depot Activity
Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
Cal West Metals (USSBA)
Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area)
Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Areas)
City/County
Anniston
Dover
Joliet
Savanna
Doyline
Lemitar
Franklin County
Spokane County
Category- Status.
R .1
R I
R
R
R
D
R
R
Number of New Final Federal Facility Sites:    8
                                            -14-

-------
                           National Priorities List,
                  Final  and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
                              (by New Final Sites)
                                  March 1989
New Final
State/Territory
Pennsylvania
New York
Michigan
Illinois
Indiana
New Jersey
North Carolina
California
Georgia
Louisiana
Texas
Washington
Wisconsin
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
New Hampshire
New Mexico
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Vermont
Virginia
A I abama
Alaska
Arkansas
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Maryland
North Dakota
Ohio
Oregon
Tennessee
American Samoa
Arizona
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
District of Columbia
Guam
Hawai i
Idaho
Maine
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Trust Territories
Utah
Virgin Islands
West Virginia
Wyoming
Non-Fed
11
10
7
4
6
6
6
4
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
0










0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0 '
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Final
Non- Fed
69
72
65
19
30
97
15
44
6
8
23
21
35
9
9
12
15
5
7
14
4
11
8
1
10
8
11
32
7
2
29
5
9
0
5
12
0
0
1
0
4
5
21
39
2
12
8
2
0
8
8
1
0
3
0
5
1
Fed
2
1
0
4
0
3
0
8
1
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
Total Proposed
Non- Fed
23
3
15
16
7
6
5
33
6
2
3
10
4
14
2
5
0
3
3
7
4
9
2
0
0
6
8
15
1
0
2
.1
3
0
3
2
0
0
0
6
0
2
1
0
1
7
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
1
Fed
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
0
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
95
76
80
39
37
107
21
88
13
11
28
42
39
23
11
17
15
10
11
21
8
21
12
1
10
14
20
47
10
2
.32
7
13
0
9
16
0
0
1
6
4
8
22
40
3
21
10
5
0
9
9
1
0
10
0
6
2
Total
93
849
41
251
22
1163
                                             -15-

-------
           U.S.  Environmental Protection
                                               \

                                         .-..••.itw
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Superfund Offices

For further  information, call the Superfund
Hotline, toll-free at 1-800-424-9346 or 382-3000 in
Washington, DC,  metropolitan area, or the
Superfund Offices listed below
Headquarters
Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response (OS-230)
401 M Street. S.W.
Washington. DC 20460
CML: (202)475-8103
FTS: 475-8103

Region 1
Waste Management Division.
  HAA-CAN 2
John F. Kennedy Building
Boston. MA 02203
CML: (617) 573-5700
FTS: 833-1700

Region 2
Emergency & Remedial Response
  Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York.'NY 10278
CML: (212) 264-8672
FTS: 264-8672
Region 3
Hazardous'Waste Management
  Division. 3HWOO
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia. PA 19107
CML: (215) 597-8131
FTS: 597-8131
Region 4
Waste Management Division
345 Courtland Street. NE
Atlanta. GA 30365
CML: (404) 347-3454
FTS: 257-3454

Region 5
Waste Management Division.
 5HS-12
230 South Dearborn Street. 12th Floor
Chicago. IL 60604
CML: (312)886-7579
FTS: 886-7579

Region 6
Hazardous Waste Management
  Division. 6H
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas. TX 75202-2733
CML: (214) 655-6700
FTS: 255-6700
Region 7
Waste Management Division
726. Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City. KS66101
CML: (913) 236-2850
FTS: 757-2850
Region 8
Hazardous Waste Management
  Division. 8HWM
999 18th Street. Suite 500 .
Denver.  CO 80202-2405
CML: (303) 293-1720
FTS: 564-1720
Region 9
Toxics & Waste Management
  Division, T-1
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco. CA 94105
CML: (415)974-7460
FTS: 454-7460
Region 10
Hazardous Waste  Division. HW-111
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle. WA98101
CML: (206)442-1906
FTS: 399-1906

-------