WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES • 16060 EGS 01/71
     INFILTRATION RATES AND GROUNDWATER
        QUALITY BENEATH CATTLE FEEDLOTS,
               TEXAS HIGH PLAINS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY • WATER QUALITY OFFICE

-------
     WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES
The Water Pollution Control Research Series describes
the results and progress in the control and abatement
of pollution in our Nation's waters.  They provide a
central source of information on the research , develop-
ment, and demonstration activities in the Water Quality
Office, Environmental Protection Agency, through inhouse
research and grants and contracts with Federal, State,
and local agencies, research institutions, and industrial
organizations.

Inquiries pertaining to Water Pollution Control Research
Reports should be directed to the Head, Project Reports
System, Office of Research and Development, Water Quality
Office, Environmental Protection Agency, Room 1108,
Washington, D. C.  20242.

-------
          INFILTRATION RATES AND GROUNDWATER
           QUALITY BENEATH CATTLE FEEDLOTS,
                   TEXAS HIGH  PLAINS
                           by
                 Texas  Tech University
               Department of Geosciences
                 Lubbock, Texas   79409
                         for the

                 WATER QUALITY OFFICE

            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   Project #16060EGS
                 Contract f 14-12-804
                      January,  1971
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents
                      Stock Number 5501-0125

-------
                      EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Water Quality Office,
EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval does not sig-
nify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and
policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                              11

-------
                          ABSTRACT
Detailed field and laboratory studies of five feedlots were
conducted to determine field seepage rates and distributive
geometry of infiltrated runoff.  Practical field seepage
rates at these sites ranged from 2 to 20 feet/year.  Disper-
sal rates of ions in the groundwater zone varied from 45 to
400 feet/year.

Nitrogen (N03, NC>2, NH4, Org-N) and common chemical parameters
(Ca, Mg, Na, K, Cl, 804, TDS, pH, and conductance) were deter-
mined in cores and groundwater samples; based on groundwater
analyses from 80 Texas High Plains feedlots, rates of con-
centration of NOj-N and Cl in groundwater beneath feedlots
range from 0.07 to 0.4 p.p.m. per year, and average 0.17 p.p.m.
per year.

Laboratory determined constant head vertical permeability
of cores from 22 feedlot sites revealed a range in values
of lO'2 to 10-6 cm/sec for Ogallala sediments, 10~4 to iO'7
cm/sec for near-surface material of floodplains and feedpen-
runoff surfaces, and values of 10~6 to 10~8 cm/sec for playa
clay.

Factors related to runoff-infiltration were correlated with
groundwater quality, and it was determined that local surfi-
cial material and regional soils patterns are closely related
to quality of groundwater beneath feedlots.  Direct correla-
tion of water quality does not exist with feedpen-runoff
slope, cattle load, and surface-area ratios of drainage basin
to collection system.

This report is submitted in fulfillment of Project Number
16060EGS, Contract Number 14-12-804, under the (partial)
sponsorship of the Water Quality Office, Environmental Pro-
tection Agency.

Key Words:  Nitrates, groundwater quality, Ogallala Forma-
            tion, core chemistry, permeability, High Plains
            geologic environment.
                             111

-------
                          CONTENTS
Section                                             Page
 I       Conclusions 	    1

 II      Recommendations	    3

 III     Introduction 	    5

            Study Sites 	    5
            Field Methods 	    9
            Laboratory Methods 	   10
            Nitrogen Cycle 	   11

 IV      Discussion of Study Area 	   13

            Geomorphology-Geology 	   13
            Groundwater	   16

 V       Infiltration-Groundwater Quality
            Relationships 	   18

 VI      Field Infiltration Rates and Dispersal
            Rates in Groundwater	   21

            Field Site I 	   21
            Field Site II 	   27
            Field Site III 	   30
            Field Site IV 	   39
            Field Site V 	   42
            Other Sites 	   42

 VII     Acknowledgments 	   53

 VIII     References Cited 	   55

-------
                            FIGURES


NO.                                                     PAGE

 1  LOCATION  OF CATTLE  FEEDLOTS  INVESTIGATED  IN  STUDY,
    TEXAS HIGH PLAINS  	   6

 2  AGE DISTRIBUTION OF FEEDLOTS IN  STUDY  	   7

 3  APPROXIMATE AVERAGE CATTLE LOAD  ys_ YEAR FEEDLOT
    ESTABLISHED	  8

 4  GENERALIZED SOIL TEXTURE  MAP, TEXAS HIGH  PLAINS  ...  15

 5  DISTRIBUTION  OF OBSERVATION  WELLS,  FIELD  SITE  I  ...  22

 6  GAMMA LOG PROFILES, FIELD SITE I 	  23

 7  SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC  PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE I  	  23

 8  DISTRIBUTION  OF NOs-N  IN  GROUNDWATER,  FIELD  SITE  I.  26

 9  DISTRIBUTION  OF OBSERVATION  WELLS,  FIELD  SITE  II  ..  28

10  GAMMA LOG PROFILES, FIELD SITE II  	  29

11  SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC  PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE II  ...  29

12  DISTRIBUTION  OF CHLORIDE  IN  GROUNDWATER,
    FIELD "SITE II 	  32

13  DISTRIBUTION  OF OBSERVATION  WELLS,  FIELD  SITE  III  .  33

14  GAMMA LOG PROFILES, FIELD SITE III	  35

15  SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC  PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE III  ..  34

16  DISTRIBUTION  OF N03-N  IN'GROUNDWATER,  FIELD
    SITE III  	  38

17  DISTRIBUTION  OF OBSERVATION  WELLS,  FIELD  SITE  IV  ..  40

18  GAMMA LOG PROFILES, FIELD SITE IV	  41

19  SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC  PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE IV*...  41

20  DISTRIBUTION  OF OBSERVATION  WELLS,  FIELD  SITE V  ...  44

.21  GAMMA LOG PROFILES, FIELD SITE V	  45
                             VI

-------
NO.                                                    PAGE

22  SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS, FIELD SITE V 	 45

23  DISTRIBUTION OF N03-N IN GROUNDWATER, FIELD SITE V. 48

24  AGE OF FEEDLOTS INVESTIGATED vs RANGE IN MAXIMUM
    N03-N CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER 	 50

25  AGE OF FEEDLOTS INVESTIGATED vs_ RANGE IN MAXIMUM
    CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION IN GROUNDWATER 	 51

26  AGE OF FEEDLOTS INVESTIGATED vs RANGE IN MAXIMUM
    CONDUCTANCE OF GROUNDWATER	 52
                             VII

-------
                           TABLES
No.                                                    Page
I      Relation of Feedlot-Runoff Seepage Factors
       to Groundwater Quality, Texas High Plains 	 20

II     Core Chemistry, Well #8, Field Site I  	 24

III    Groundwater Chemistry, Field Site I 	 25

IV     Core Chemistry, Well #9, Field Site II	 30

V      Groundwater Chemistry, Field Site II  	 31

VI     Core Chemistry, Well #20, Field Site  III  	 36

VII    Groundwater Chemistry, Field Site III  	 37

VIII   Core Chemistry, Well #7, Field Site IV	 39

IX     Groundwater Chemistry, Field Site IV  	 43

X      Core Chemistry, Well #9, Field Site V 		 46

XI     Groundwater Chemistry, Field Site V 	 47
                            Vlll

-------
                         CONCLUSIONS


1.  Concentration values of ammoniacal, organic and nitrite
nitrogens, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and chlo-
ride in collected cattle-feedlot runoff exceed "normal" val-
ues for groundwater in the Ogallala Formation.  Nitrate-
nitrogen in collected feedlot runoff may be found to be less
concentrated than in Ogallala groundwater.  The occurrence
of high values of nitrate-nitrogen in Ogallala groundwater
in the vicinity of a feedlot is not always prima facie evi-
dence of a feedlot source.

2.  Nitrite-nitrogen, ammoniacal and organic nitrogen occur
in high concentrations in collected feedlot runoff.  These
ions usually are partially removed at the surface or retained
in the unsaturated subsurface environment and do not concen-
trate in the saturated zone in proportion (quantitatively)
to their surface occurrence.  Removal of ammonia, organic
and nitrite-nitrogen is a result of nitrification-denitrification
reactions as well as volatilization of ammonia.  Nitrogen
retention is in part accountable to clay mineral adsorption
and to bacterial fixation.

3.  Surficial silt-clay mixtures of feedpens and/or runoff
surfaces exhibit secondary cementation in the form of root
fillings, vug and pore fillings, and veinlets.  Below this
developed hardpan, soil densities are noticeably less and
permeability values are larger.

4.  The ubiquitous Texas High Plains "caprock" caliche is
often porous and permeable below runoff collection systems.
Secondary solution of caliche is evidenced by vugs, second-
ary cementation of fractures and solution vugs, and by silt-
clay-fillings in the solution vugs and voids.

5.  The unsaturated zone of the Ogallala Formation is slow-
to-rapidly permeable.  Laboratory determined constant head
vertical permeability values in the unsaturated zone range'
from 10~2 to 10~6 cm/second.  Laboratory determined perme-
ability values of playa sediments are usually less than 10~°
cm/second.  Permeability values of feedpen and runoff sur-
face material range from 10~^ to 10"^ cm/second.   Minimum
permeability of the surficial mantle and minimum permeability
values of the Ogallala sediments determine practical infil-
tration rates.

6.  Regional soils patterns and the localized surficial sedi-
ments of playas are related to groundwater quality beneath
cattle feedlots.   Total infiltration and infiltration rates
are greater in the sandy soil zones than in the hardland

-------
zones of the High Plains.  The "ponding" part of playas that
contain the usual clay layer are an effective barrier against
infiltration of feedlot runoff.

7.  Concentration in groundwater of dissolved solids derived
from High Plains cattle feedlots is restricted to the vicinity
of the point-source (feedlot).  This is accountable to the
low total volume of infiltrate, plus dilution of the infil-
trate in the groundwater zone.  Low total volume of infil-
trate is, in large part, due to (A) low rainfall, high runoff-
evaporation rates, (B) low permeability factors associated
with the feedlots, and (C) secondary precipitation in the
unsaturated zone.  Around feedlots a significant dilution
factor is the usually large flow rate (natural and induced)
in the Ogallala relative to permeability rates between the
watertable and the surface.  Groundwater dispersal rates
determined under existing field conditions show average values
ranging from 45 to 400 feet per year.  Actual dispersal rates
are greatly dependent upon distribution and pumping rate
of producing wells at the site.  Where a feedlot operation
uses large volumes of groundwater, significant quantities
of infiltrate that reach the saturated zone are recovered
by pumping.

8.  Practical seepage rates determined under existing field
environments range from 2 to 20 feet/year.  Rates of concen-
tration of NOj-N in the Ogallala Formation of the High Plains
approximate 0.07 to 0.3 p.p.m. NC^-N/year.  Approximate values
for rate of concentration of chloride are 0.07 to 0.4 p.p.m.
Cl/year.  Average values for rates of concentration of chlo-
ride and nitrate-nitrogen are about 0.17 p.p.m. per year.
Average rates of increase in conductance values for ground-
water beneath High Plains feedlots are 40-100 micromhos/cm
per year.

9.  There are several feedlots in this study that have con-
tributed N03-N to levels approaching or exceeding recommended
limits (10 p.p.m. NC^-N).  Some of the lots that have degraded
water quality approaching recommended limits are expected
to exceed such limits in the future.  On the other hand,
some sites in the High Plains will probably never signifi-
cantly degrade groundwater quality, the reasons being slow
infiltration rates relative to groundwater dispersal rates,
recycling of infiltrated runoff, subsurface impermeability
at the site, and rapid dispersal of surface runoff^  No re-
gional degradation of the Ogallala groundwater is expected
in the foreseeable future, only degradation in specific
localized areas.

-------
                       RECOMMENDATIONS
1.  Ion-balance studies are needed of nitrogen and other com-
mon ions associated with feedlot runoff.  As already known,
the concentration of some ions, for example Ca, K, N0£, NH^,
Org-N, are not quantitatively correlative from ponded runoff
to the unsaturated zone to the groundwater zone.  Imbalances
of nitrogen are in part attributable to nitrification-
denitrification reactions and volatilization of ammonia; Ca
and K reductions are attributable to cation exchange reactions
between plants-soils-bacteria and to chemical precipitation
by oxidation reactions and evaporation.  Natural processes
operate to cause such desirable imbalances; thus, techniques
need to be investigated to enhance these desirable results.

2.  An investigation is required to determine optimal rela-
tionships of seepage to return flow (pumping) under field
conditions.  Some feedlots for all practical purposes should
show buildup of runoff in the groundwater zone yet the buildup
does not occur; quantitative relationships of seepage to re-
turn flow need to be evaluated.  Slow seepage rates may be
acceptable for feedlots that use large volumes of groundwater.

3.  Shallow-hole exploration (20-40 feet) of playas is needed
to better determine the geology and its relation to control
of seepage.  New (pre-feedlot) and old playas should be in-
cluded to evaluate the effects of colloid-filtrate plugging.

4.  Periodic evaluation of groundwater quality beneath selected
sites used in this study should be made on an annual basis.
It is recommended that water supply wells in the vicinity
of all feedlots be sampled annually for specific ion content
in groundwater.

5.  In selecting future feedlot sites to minimize degradation
of groundwater it seems significant to pay attention to the
geographic location, type of "runoff system" and liquid-waste
handling procedures, composition and structure of near-surface
earth materials at the site, and pre-existing water quality
beneath the site.

Ideally, it would seem preferable to locate sites outside
areas with very sandy soil zones.  This in fact has been the
trend in feedlot location, though probably unintentional.
The "migration" of feedlots has been northward on the Plains
to areas with less sandy soil than exists in the south, south-
west part of the Plains.

-------
The best "runoff system" should be a situation where long-
term' ponding does not occur.  Water that is ponded should
be in an essentially impermeably bottomed reservoir.  Many
High Plains playas serve this purpose if_ the natural clay
liner is not breached and the storage capacity of the imper-
meable  (clay) part .of the playa is not exceeded.  If the
natural clay liner of a playa is breached, the side-slopes
of the  excavation as well as the bottom should be restored
to its  original density.  Clay layers in playas are lense-
shaped  bodies that are thin toward the edges of the "ponding"
part of the playa; therefore, the "ponding" area of a playa
adjoins what can be relatively permeable material.  Long-
term induced head due to "ponding", even in poorly permeable
zones,  may eventually cause movement of liquid-waste to the
groundwater zone.  Handling procedures for liquid waste may
be of considerable significance in reducing potential pollu-
tion hazards.  Spreading of liquid waste increases the ulti-
mate destruction and rate of conversion of nitrogens to tol-
erable  levels as well as serving to decrease concentrations
in localized areas.

Permeability data taken from cores of the subsurface unsatu-
rated zone (Ogallala Formation) and from near-surface soil
zones of feedlots indicate that the least permeable zones
are consistently at or near the surface.  This is a result
of several factors some of which are inherently due to the
geologic development of the Ogallala and some due to second-
ary precipitation of dissolved solids in soil zones of feed-
lot runoff surfaces.  Runoff slopes in time usually decrease
in permeability.

There are places in the High Plains where naturally .occurring
nitrate-nitrogen and other ions are in high concentration.
Obviously, in these geographic areas small additions of un-
desirable chemical compounds to the groundwater zone can
degrade water quality to an intolerable limit for household
or municipal use.  The intolerable limit one speaks of is
dependent upon the intended usage of the water.  Certainly
many industrial  and agricultural applications of water have
much higher tolerable limits in terms of nitrate-nitrogen
and other ionic  concentrations than water for household usage

-------
                        INTRODUCTION
Increasing concern within the last decade over possible con-
centration of nitrate and other ions in the saturated zone
beneath commercial cattle feedlots has warranted numerous
studies where feedlots proliferate.  Fortuitously interrela-
ted factors of climate, soil, and groundwater, resulting in
high-yield feedgrain production, have led to development of
over one hundred major cattle feeding operations in the High
Plains of Texas.  Commercial cattle feedlots have been in
existence in the Texas High Plains for 35 years, but increas-
ing concern due to asymtotic development within the 1960's
led to initiation of this and other studies.

The initial objectives of this study included (1) quantita-
tive estimates and distributive geometry of nitrogen (N03,
N02, NH4,- Org-N) and other chemiqal parameters (Ca, Mg, Na,
K, Cl, §64, pH, conductance) in groundwater below some major
feedlot operations, and (2) determination of relative rates
of movement of infiltrates from surface to the groundwater
zone under field conditions existing in the High Plains.
Initiation of the original project by the EPA led to incor-
poration of additional objectives supported by the Texas Water
Development Board, Texas Cattle Feeders Association, North
Plains Water District (Texas), and Texas Tech University.
The principal objectives incorporated into the total project,
by support of the aforementioned agencies, were to (3)  deter-
mine the significance of subsurface distribution of dissolved
solids from feedlot runoff to the groundwater zone (Ogallala
aquifer), and to (4) evaluate what total geologic environment(s)
in the High Plains is (are) least conducive to infiltration
of feedlot runoff to the groundwater zone.  Discussion, pres-
entation of data, and conclusions relative to objectives 1
and 2 are, primarily, herein reported.   A separate publica-
tion-'- relative to objectives 3 and 4 is in preparation.


Study Sites

Eighty commercial cattle feedlots (locations, Figure 1) were
investigated to varying degrees for the total research pro-
gram.  The 80 feedlots ranged from new to 35 years in estab-
lished age (distribution, Figure 2) with a one-time cattle
capacity of over one million head (load vs years established,
Figure 3).
         be published by International Center for Arid and
Semi-Arid Land Studies, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.

-------
                         OKLAHOMA
                                     ^v
                               HUTCHINSON^1*
FIGURE 1—LOCATION OF CATTLE  FEEDLOTS INVESTIGATED  IN  STUDY,
                       TEXAS HIGH PLAINS

-------
41950   51
52    53   54   55   56   57    58   59   I960   61   62   63    64   65   66    67   68   69   1970
                                 YEAR FEEDLOTS  ESTABLISHED
                  FIGURE  2--AGE DISTRIBUTION OF FEEDLOTS  IN STUDY

-------
    o
    o
    o
    .iH
    X!
    E-"
    a
oo   pq
    I
    w
    H
    PH
ISO



165



150



135



120



105



90



75



60



45



30



 15
                   0
 10.3



 10.0
t

L
! 6.7



 3.3
       15   10   5   0

       AGE IN YEARS
              t!950   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59  I960  61   62   63   64   65   €6  67   68  69  1970



                                       YEAR FEEDLOTS  ESTABLISHED
              FIGURE  3--APPROXIMATE AVERAGE  CATTLE  LOAD  vs. YEAR FEEDLOT ESTABLISHED

-------
Twenty-two feedlots were drilled and/or cored to investigate
subsurface geology and chemistry of part of the unsaturated
zone.  Five representative feedlots, each of which lies south
of the Canadian River, are herein described in detail.

Socio-economic implications inherent in such a volatile topic
as feedlots and potential groundwater pollution prohibit
detailed locations.  The specific site locations are of but
academic interest; geologic environments and their relation
to the Texas High Plains geologic framework are the signifi-
cant factors.  Accordingly, we have designated the sites
under the generality of field sites I thru V.


Field Methods

Holes were drilled with a commercially-owned mud-rotary rig
and with a mud-rotary rig of the Texas Water Development
Board.  All coring was completed with the TWDB rig.  Drilled
holes were reamed 12 3/4 inches in diameter to a depth of
50 feet and then completed to TD with an 8 3/4-inch bit.
All drilled holes were.set with slotted, 6-inch plastic casing
and cemented -to a depth of 50 feet.  One-foot extensions
of casing above ground level were capped with a commercial
well seal. • Holes drilled and cored with the Water Develop-
ment Board rig were completed to TD with an 8 3/4-inch bit,
and set with slotted, 5-inch plastic casing, cemented to a
depth of 20-40 feet, and capped with.a commercial well seal.
Holes were completed below the watertable but not necessarily
to the base of the Ogallala Formation.  Gamma and spontaneous
potential-resistivity logs were run by the U. S. Geological
Survey, Lubbock, Texas, on all drilled holes reported in this
phase of the project.

Four-inch diameter, two-foot long rotary cores of the Ogal-
lala Formation were taken with a double-walled core barrel
with a custom-designed sheet-metal liner to retain the core
upon removal from the barrel.  Four-inch diameter push barrels
were used for cores of soil zones.  Core samples collected
in the field for chemical analysis were retained below ground-
water temperatures with dry ice.  The metal liners were sealed
with paraffin, the push cores sealed with plastic wrapping
and paraffin, and then shipped to the TWDB Materials Testing
Laboratory, Austin, Texas, for determination of plasticity
index, void ratio, porosity, permeability, size analysis,
and moisture content.  Field and laboratory descriptions
of lithology were made according to the Unified Soil Classi-
fication System.

-------
Laboratory'Methods

Laboratory core analyses included determination of (1) in
situ unit weight and moisture content, (2) Atterberg Limits,
(3) shrinkage factors,  (4) grain size analysis by sieving
and hydrometer, (5) specific gravity, and (6) vertical con-
stant head permeability.  In addition to the above labora-
tory tests, void ratio, porosity, and degree of saturation
were calculated.

Details of techniques used to determine each of the afore-
mentioned parameters are available from the following sources
The in situ unit weight and moisture content test procedure
used is "Suspended Weight in Air and Water", as described
in U. S. Bureau of Reclamation Earth Manual, Designation
E-10, Part E, page 454.

The test procedure for  determining Atterberg Limits was the
one-point hand method for liquid limit (LL), as described
in the Texas Highway Department Soil Manual, Test Method
Tex-104-E.  The plastic limit (PL) and plasticity index (PI)
were measured according to ASTM Test Specification D-424;
shrinkage factors are described in ASTM Test Specification
D-427.

The grain-size analysis procedure used is described in ASTM
Test Specification D-422.  Al-1 soils samples in which 5%
or more of the material passed the No.. 200  sieve were graded
by both sieving and hydrometer analysis.

The procedure used to determine the specific gravity of soil
is described in ASTM Test Specification D-854.  Fifty-gram
samples were treated in a 500 ml flask; a vacuum pump was
used to remove entrapped air.

Constant head permeability tests were run on an undisturbed
core, trimmed to obtain parallel ends and uniform diameter.
The sample was then placed in a permeameter and saturated
under constant head.  When uniform flow was obtained, the
quantity of water flow  during a measured time was determined.
Permeability was calculated as shown.
                              thA

               K = coefficient of permeability
               Q = quantity of flow
               L = core  length
               t = time  elapsed
               h = total head loss
               A = core  cross-sectional area
                             10

-------
Water-quality parameters determined include the nitrogen
family (NO,, N0£, Ntfy, Org-N), common ions (Cl, Ca, Mg, Na,
K, 504), pH and conductance.

Water-quality determinations were made using Orion specific
ion probes, a Technicon nitrogen autoanalyzer, and wet chem-
istry techniques; conductivity and pH values were measured
by meters.  The wet chemistry analyses were performed in
accordance with procedures specified in Standard Methods
for Examination of Water and Wastewater.  Duplication of
analytical techniques was employed in the examination of
many samples in order to provide a basis for correlation
of results obtained by different techniques.

Aliquots for core chemistry were taken by soaking and mechani-
cally mixing equal weights of sediment and distilled water.
The core extracts were analyzed in the same manner as the
water samples.
Nitrogen Cycle

A review of the nitrogen cycle is presented as prelude to
the discussion of feedlots and water quality.  Nitrogen in
nature occurs as molecular nitrogen (N?); as organic nitro-
gen in urea, proteins, amino acids, and protein derivatives;
inorganic nitrite (N02), nitrate (N03), ammonia (Nt^), and
ammonium (NH^) ions; and as other less  (quantitatively) im-
portant intermediate products.

All animals and plants contain nitrogen, and nitrogen also
exists in the earth's atmosphere, lithosphere", and hydrosphere
Inorganic physico-chemical reactions and inorganic-organic
reactions associated with plant-animal metabolic activity
serve as the "catalyst" whereby nitrogen in various forms
is cycled in nature.  As a generality, the biological (in-
organic-organic) phase of the nitrogen cycle is graphically
represented.
\
ORG. M
FIXATION
j «
i
ATTER-* 	 »-ORG
t
Kl —


I
\
i
1 1 -
r
A

* N2,02 ~
NITRIFICATION
> — »!*% ^«.
^REDUCTION
,J
N2
j

— »-N
J
,02
t
^FICATION
r
           RECYCLE
                             11

-------
In the cycle, organic nitrogen is converted into inorganic
ammonia, nitrite, nitrate and to molecular nitrogen.  Decom-
position of organic matter results in formation of organic
nitrogen and other products.  Subsequently, organic nitrogen
is used as an energy source by bacteria and is converted to
ammonia.  Large quantities of ammonia escape to the atmosphere
as a gas; other molecules of ammonia are oxidized under aerobic
conditions, as a bacterial energy source, to nitrite and ni-
trate.  Nitrite and nitrate may further be converted to nitro-
gen gas.

Shortcuts and reversals exist in the aforementioned oxidative
process  (See diagram).  Under anaerobic conditions, nitrate
may be  converted to nitrite and to nitrogen gas.  To close
the cycle, some organisms are capable of assimilating nitro-
gen into cellular matter.

Significant differences in factors affecting the nitrogen
cycle exist between the environment of feedlots and that of
many freshwater systems.  These factors are the organic-inor-
ganic load, predominance of bacterial activity over the ac-
tivity  of algae, changing aerobic-anaerobic environments,
and the removal of runoff to the subsurface environment.

A Texas High Plains feedlot surface is an environment of al-
ternate wetting-drying, the organic and inorganic load exceeds
the capacity for degradation, the surface is aerobic (some-
times anaerobic at depth), and bacterial activity is high.
The runoff collection-system is heavily laden with organic-
inorganic matter, oxygen-deficient conditions often exist
at depth, and bacterial activity is high.  In the unsaturated
subsurface, seepage results in removal of liquid from the
anaerobic conditions.  The denitrification and reduction of
nitrate by bacteria account for relatively low concentrations
of nitrate in feedlot-runoff collection ponds.  On the con-
trary,  nitrification  (oxidation) of organic nitrogen, nitrite
and ammonia to nitrate account in part for the accumulation
of nitrate in the unsaturated zone and groundwater zone be-
neath feedlots.
                             12

-------
                DISCUSSION OF STUDY AREA
Observations on the relationships of cattle feedlot sites
to geomorphological-geological features and groundwater
quality in the Southern High Plains are presented, followed
by descriptions of representative field sites.  Outlining
the geologic setting of High Plains cattle feedlots provides
the framework for evaluating relative rates of movement of
nitrate and other ions from the surface to the watertable,
and natural rates of dispersal in the groundwater zone under
existing field conditions.


Geomorphology-Geology

The High Plains is in the "Panhandle" of Texas and is the
southernmost extension of the Great Plains which borders
the east side of the Rocky Mountains.  The High Plains is
bounded on the east and west by an erosional escarpment and
merges southward into the Edwards Plateau.

Only one major stream, the Canadian River, transgresses the
southern High Plains, but tributary drainage to the Red, Colo-
rado, and Brazos rivers originates in the region.  Drainage
relative to cattle feedlots is localized principally within
the stream systems and in the ubiquitous closed-drainage pla-
yas that occur in the region.  Semiarid climatic conditions
of low rainfall (±20 inches), large daily fluctuations in
temperature (±40°) , and high-wind conditions (5-35 mph) re-
sult in low values for long-term runoff and in periods of
rapid drying.

Most feedlots in the High Plains are located on stream drain-
age systems or playa systems.  Approximately 40% of the feed-
lots considered in this study are located on streams, 45%
on playas, and 15% have no relation to the aforementioned
geomorphic features.  These statistics are applicable to all
feedlots in the Texas High Plains.  Of course, good drainage
is an economic asset and in most instances such benefits are
readily obtainable by proper geographic location.

High Plains streams have gradients ranging from about 10 feet/
mile to less than 5 feet/mile.  Feedlot playas considered in
this study have a relief of from 5 to 45 feet of closed con-
tours.  Feedpens located adjacent to stream channels and pla-
yas in Armstrong, Bailey, Castro, Lamb, Lubbock, Farmer and
parts of Deaf Smith counties (Figure 1) have drainage slopes
ranging from 2% to 5%; feedpens in Floyd, Hale, Gray, Potter,
Oldham and Moore counties have slopes ranging between 0.2%
and 2%.  Few feedpen slopes of the High Plains exceed 5% in
value.

                           13

-------
The Ogallala Formation, the principal aquifer, surfaces the
Texas High Plains, along with a thin intermittent veneer of
unconsolidated Pleistocene sediments.  The Ogallala is breached
to the-underlying Cretaceous System in some large playas (non
feedlot) and to the Triassic and Permian systems along the
Canadian River.

Soils distribution in the High Plains (Figure 4) (1, 2, 3)
has a significant relation to infiltration of surface water,
thus a relationship to infiltration of cattle feedlot runoff.
Rates of infiltration and total accumulation of dissolved
solids in groundwater are, in general, higher in "sandy soils"
and areas of "sand dunes" than in the tighter soil zones.
Total dissolved solids (TDS) and specific-ion maps^ (chloride,
nitrate) of areas in the southern High Plains where no feedlots
are located, indicate this relationship.  A contributing factor
for the sandy soils, groundwater quality relationship is the
relatively rapid entrapment of surface water by loose surficial
material (sand) which prevents ready runoff, evaporation, and
even evapotranspiration due to low plant density.  One should
add"that the significance of soils distribution in terms of
potential degradation of large volumes of groundwater is di-
minished when one considers the low total number of feedlots
(±20 in 1970) in the sandy soil zones of the High Plains.

Most surface materials on stream and playa feedlot slopes
consist of dense, fine-grained, semi-consolidated soils under-
lain by caliche.  Feedlots located on Texas High Plains streams
have feedpens situated on slopes consisting of caliche and
thin soils, but in many the stream bottoms have breached the
caliche.  Feedlots in headwater areas and tributaries of streams
have the usual caliche zone beneath the stream channel.  Poorly
permeable, thin zones of clayey silt were found in stream
channels that breach the caliche; at most sites these zones
were underlain by thin layers of fine- to coarse-grained sand
and/or gravel.  The clayey silt and sand-gravel valley fill
overlies the Ogallala Formation.

Vertical constant head permeability values determined for the
clay-silt sediments of channels are 10"^ to 10"^ cm/second.3
The underlying sand zones usually have vertical permeability
values of 10"' cm/sec, or larger.  Most sediments that occupy
the floodplain of the channel consist of a near-surface zone
     2
      Derived from published and unpublished data of Texas
Water Development Board and High Plains Water District, and
by chemical analyses in Geoscience Department Water Quality
Lab, Texas Tech University.  In preparation for publication.

     31 X 10"6 cm/sec equals 1.034 ft/year.


                             14

-------
                          OKLAHOMA
                                                   LEGEND



                                             |   | FINE TEXTURED SOILS


                                                 SANDY SOILS

                                                 SAND DUNES
FIGURE 4--GENERALIZED SOIL  TEXTURE MAP,  TEXAS HIGH PLAINS

           (After Carter,  1931; Lotspeich § Coover, 1962;
           Lehman, Stewart § Mathers,  1970)
                            15

-------
of clay and clay-silt that is slowly permeable to impervious.
Vertical constant head permeability values determined for
floodplain sediments in this study range from 10~? cm/sec
to larger permeability values.

The "pond" of playas is surfaced by layers of clay, which
is underlain by layers of "lake-fill" sand and/or lenses of
clay-silt-sand.  Playa "fills" up to 40 feet in thickness
were measured, and all are underlain by the Ogallala Forma-
tion.  Vertical permeability values of playa lake clay are
10~6 to 10~8 cm/sec or lower in value (impermeable).  Lithi-
fication of medium and coarse-grained clastic zones is notice-
ably absent beneath the "standing water area" in all types
of collection systems.

Surficial silt-clay mixtures surfacing feedpens and/or run-
off slopes exhibit secondary cementation in the form of root
fillings, vug and pore fillings, and veinlets.  Below this
developed hardpan, soil densities are noticeably less.  Per-
meability values typical of the hardpan surface of feedpens
and drainage slopes range from 10~4 to 10~? cm/second.

Caliche below playa and stream channel collection systems
is porous and permeable.  Secondary solution of caliche is
evidenced by vugs, secondary cementation of fractures and
solution vugs, and by silt-clay filling in solution vugs and
voids.

The Ogallala Formation underlies the surficial material at
all feedlots considered in this study.  In terms of infiltra-
tion, most laboratory determined permeability values in the
unsaturated zone range from 10"^ cm/sec to 10~6 cm/sec; the
larger permeability values of Ogallala sediments will permit
rapid percolation of water.  However, minimum permeability
of near-surface material and minimum permeability values of
Ogallala sediments determine actual vertical transmissibility
rates.
Groundwater

Groundwater in the study area is ubiquitous within the Ogal-
lala Formation.  Depth-to-water ranges from a minimum of 10
feet (parts of Tierra Blanca Draw) to depths of 250-300 feet.
Saturated thicknesses range from 30 feet to 300 feet in areas
investigated.  Concentration of water-quality parameters in
this study varies significantly in the Ogallala aquifer within
short distances  (few hundred feet), regionally from north to
south, and in some geographic localities from west to east.
                             16

-------
In the High Plains, nitrite, ammoniacal and organic nitrogen,
sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, and total-dissolved-
sojids (IDS) are definitive parameters for collected feed-
lot runoff.  Most feedlot runoff (ponded) ranges from less
than one hundred to several hundred p.p.m. of ammoniacal and
organic nitrogen, chloride, sodium, calcium, potassium, and
up to several thousand p.p.m. of IDS.  These chemical parame-
ters invariably are more concentrated in collected runoff
than in Ogallala groundwater.  Nitrite and nitrate-nitrogen
concentrations in feedlot runoff (ponded) range from less
than 10 p.p.m. to several tens-of-parts-per-million.  Nitrite-
nitrogen is -consistently more concentrated in feedlot runoff
than in groundwater, but this relation is not always true
for nitrate-nitrogen.

There are areas in the southern High Plains, particularly
in sandy soil zones, where naturally occurring N03-N is higher
in "normal" Ogallala groundwater than in water beneath feed-
lots that show evidence of "seeping" to the watertable.
Thus, in order to relate groundwater quality to cattle feed-
lot runoff one must first establish the quality of water
in the Ogallala aquifer in the vicinity of a feedlot site
prior to time of establishment of the site in question.

Ionic concentrations in feedlot runoff are often difficult
to correlate with concentrations of specific ions in ground-
water derived from feedlot runoff.   This is particularly
true for potassium.  Rarely is there correlation of high
potassium concentrations in feedlot runoff with low potas-
sium concentrations consistent in Ogallala groundwater.
This is in part accountable by plant use of potassium, ad-
sorption by clay minerals, and use  of potassium by organisms.
Nitrite-nitrogen, ammoniacal nitrogen and organic nitrogen
infiltrated from feedlot runoff also are not easily corre-
lated with the occurrence of these  ions in groundwater.
Such imbalances are attributable to inorganic oxidation-
reduction reactions and/or to metabolic processes of organisms,
Chloride and conductivity values, and sometimes NOj-N, show
the most consistent correlation.

As noted previously, secon'dary precipitation of dissolved
solids is readily noticeable in the few feet of near-surface
material of feedlots and in parts of the unsaturated zone
of the Ogallala Formation.  This is another cause of the
often observed common cation-anion  imbalance between the
chemistry of cattle feedlot runoff  and groundwater.
                             17

-------
                 INFILTRATION - GROUNDWATER
                    QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS


Theoretical consideration aside, particular attention was
given to field evaluation of factors that control seepage
and seepage rates.  Cattle loading history in terms of years
and number of cattle was developed for 80 feedlot sites.
Other data for the sites include determining thickness of
the saturated and the unsaturated zones; feedpen slopes;
drainage basin, feedpen, collection system area-volume re-
lations; and type of collection system.  Other practical mat-
ters of rainfall rates and periodicity, and balance studies
of amount and rate of runoff-evaporation-infiltration were
not determined directly.  Distribution of nitrogen (N03,
N02, NH,, Org-N) and common chemical parameters (Ca, Mg,
Na, K, Cl, 804, pH, conductance) in groundwater beneath the
80 feedlots and their vicinity were determined.  Also, near-
surface cores were taken from 22 feedlot sites (feedpens
and collection ponds) in the High Plains.

From a regional viewpoint, concentration of nitrate and other
dissolved solids in groundwater as a result of runoff from
feedlots is related to soils patterns.  The southern part
of the southern High Plains and the western part of the North
Plains has a sandy soil cover (Figure 4, page 15), and the
feedlot water-quality data developed for this study Show
higher infiltrate concentrations in groundwater beneath the
sandy soil zones than in the hardland region.  As noted pre-
viously, this observation concerning soil-infiltration re-
lationships .is confirmed, independent of this study, by Texas
Water Development Board annual observation well records and
by specific ion (N03, Cl) distribution maps of the southern
High Plains.

Local sediment distribution is significant also.  Surface
sediments in High Plains playas are, almost invariably, es-
sentially impermeable (<10~6 cm/sec).  Also, secondary depo-
sition in feedpens and on runoff slopes develops a near-
surface hardpan that retards infiltration.  The unsaturated
portion of the Ogallala at few sites considered in this study
is sufficiently impervious t.o prevent some seepage of ponded
feedlot runoff if it penetrates the surfacing mantle; there-
fore, permeability of near-surface material is often the
essential controlling factor in infiltration.

No direct correlation between drainage slopes and groundwater
quality in the High Plains is apparent.  As indicated pre-
viously, few slopes exceed about 5 percent, and within these
limits other overriding factors evidently are more signifi-
cant.  The prime significance of feedlot slopes is to pre-
vent ponding which increases the probability of seepage.


                             18

-------
Ratios of collection-system area to area of drainage-basin
are in general unrelated directly to groundwater quality-
Possible exceptions to this observation are large ratios of
drainage-basin area to runoff-collection area of feedlots
located on stream channels, and small ratios of drainage basin
to runoff-collection area of feedlots located on playa sys-
tems.  In many large drainage basins with through-flowing
streams into which feedlots empty, there has not been any
significant buildup of infiltrates beneath the feedlots.
Perhaps other unknown factors affect this relationship.

According to Lehman, Stewart and Mathers (3), playa collec-
tion systems that are small (volume) in relation to drainage
basin areas influence infiltration of impounded water.  Com-
putation of drainage-basin area to playa-area ratios and their
correlation to groundwater quality do not confirm this.  How-
ever, a study by Hauser (4) and permeability determinations
in this current study leads the writer to agree with Lehman
and others.  One must conclude that small ratios of drainage
basin to playa volume are of some importance in preventing
collection and infiltration of runoff in the "overflow" parts
of the playas bordered by sandy soils.  Hence, the pumping
of excess water out of playa collection systems is a justi-
fiable practice.

Cattle load and surface-area of feedpens may have some sig-
nificance to seepage and seepage rates, but they do not appear
to be independently related, to groundwater quality beneath
Texas High Plains cattle feedlots.  Perhaps the interaction
with other factors may mask their correlation with ground-
water quality.  A summary of the relationship of this and
other factors to quality of groundwater are enumerated in
Table I."
                              19

-------
                                          TABLE I
            RELATION OP FEEDLOT RUNOFF SEEPAGE FACTORS TO GROUNDWATER QUALITY,
                                     TEXAS HIGH PLAINS
NJ
O
              Factors
Geographic Location

Age of lot

Feedlot cattle load
Feedpen surface

Feedpen gradient
Stream gradient
Drainage area vs Feedpen area

Type o£ collection system

System capacity vs Drainage area
Collection-pond surficial material
Subsurface *lithology
Caliche "caprock"

Depth to water
Saturated thickness beneath lot
                     Relation
Significant; related to soils distribution, geomor-
phic and geologic control.
Significance interdependent on other factors.  Related,
but old feedlots do not mean pollution.
Not considered significant for commercial feedlots .
Surficial material of most feedpens is poorly permea-
ble due to compaction and cementation.
Not correlative with groundwater quality.
No relation to groundwater quality.
Rarely significant; Only with very large ratios in
streams and small ratios in playas.
Significant; playa and non-ponding system away from
stream most desirable.
Not always significant.  Local geology important.
Important; playa clay impermeable.
Minimum permeability significant in Ogallala.
Significance is questionable due to unpredictable
permeability.
Significant in some geographic locations.
Importance dependent in part on transmissibility of
Ogallala Formation.

-------
            FIELD  INFILTRATION  RATES  AND  DISPERSAL
                    RATES  IN GROUNDWATER
 Infiltration  and  groundwater  dispersal  rates  of  feedlot  run-
 off  are  evaluated within  the  detailed geologic framework
 of five  selected  field  sites.   In  addition, concentration
 of NOj-N,  chloride,  and conductance values  in groundwater
 are  correlated with  the ages  of 80 feedlots (Locations,
 Figure 1,  p.  6) to further  determine field  rates  of  infil-
 tration  that  exist in the Texas High Plains.  The field  sites,
 designated I  through V, are located in  the  central part  of
 the  southern  High Plains.

 Field Site I.  Distribution of  observation wells  at  Site I
 is shown in Figure 5.   This feedlot is  eleven years  old  and
 has  a one-time capacity of  7,000 head of  cattle.   Runoff
 from this  feedlot collects  in a large shallow playa  that
 contains an open  borehole which has been  in existence for
 two  years;  surface runoff moves by gravity flow into the
 groundwater zone.

 The  Ogallala  Formation  crops out at the surface in the feed-
 pens.  The  playa  contains 20-25  feet of sediment  consisting
 of a near-surface clay  and, underlying this,  alternating
 lenses of  clay-silt  and nodular caliche;  a profile of sub-
 surface'  lithology of the Ogallala Formation at Field Site I
 is shown in Figure 6, page 23.

 Thirteen cores were  taken for permeability determinations,
 but  most of the section is so loosely consolidated and fria-
 ble  that in situ permeability determinations were not always
 possible.   Constant  head permeability values determined  at
 this site  in  the  Ogallala range from 1.45 X 10"5  cm/sec  to
 5.5  X 10"3  cm/second.   Certainly 10~5 cm/sec  is near the
 minimum permeability of the Ogallala at this  site.  The  clay
 layer of the playa is very slowly permeable to impermeable
 (10"' cm/sec).  Various hydrologic parameters of  subsurface
 material are  shown in Figure 7, page 23.

 Core chemistry (Table II)  beneath the collection pond indi-
 cates runoff has not infiltrated to the groundwater  zone.
 Water-quality data (Table III, p. 25)  from well installations
 (Well #5, #6,  Figure 5)  also indicate that seepage has not
 occurred beneath the feedpens to the groundwater  zone.

 Laboratory determined minimum permeability values for the
 Ogallala at this site are about 15 feet/year.   Depth-to-water
 beneath the feedpens is 120-130 feet,  which theoretically
would permit seepage to the watertable within about 8-9 years.
 Since runoff has not reached the watertable due to seepage,


                             21

-------
                                                    •~  WELL

                                                   -„,__ TOPOGRAPHIC
                                                  ~34iS—  CONTOUR

                                                   	 ROAD

                                                  CONTOUR INTERVAL s FEET
FIGURE  5--DISTRIBUTION  OF OBSERVATION WELLS,

                   FIELD SITE  I
                          22

-------
                                                    WELL 16

                                                    el. 3430
 Elev.
 3400-
 3375-
 3350-
 3325-
3300-
 3275-
           FIGURE  6--GAMMA LOG PROFILES,  FIELD  SITE I
FEET   GAMMA LOG
BELOW    WELL 8
L.S.D.
 0-
.25
     RELATIVE
    GRAIN SIZE
    DISTRIBUTION
       (mm.)
                 p%
   K-cm. sect1
.005  .45  70 90  30  40 45  K>~2  IO~S  Kf4  IO"6
—i       ii       ti    i   I    i   u_
                                                ii       ii
                                             k     k
80-
100-
                                                            i     iii
        RADIATION  -
        INCREASING
   ^GRAIN SIZE
    INCREASING
    VOID RATIO  POROSITY
^PERMEABILITY
  INCREASING
  FIGURE  7--SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE  I

                                    23

-------
       TABLE  II--CORE CHEMISTRY, WELL  #8,  FIELD SITE I


   FEET BELOW
   L.S.D.   N03-N N02-N  An-N   ORG-N   CA    MG    CL    SO/,   IDS   pH   I MOIST


     0    6.64  0.003   0    0.84    38    6    20    28   211  8.03   13
     9    1.33  0.003   0    0.84    44    H    20    20    78  8.10   15
     17    1.33  0.003   0    0.56    42    8    20    16   448  8.13   13
     44    0.44  0.003   0    0.56    38    8    20    12    68  8.22   17

     67    0.88  0.003   0    0.56    45    6    26    13   192  8.01   17
     90    0.81  0.003   0    0.56    30    9    12    11   120  8.30   13
      ALL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION VALUES REPORTED AS DRY WEIGHT; ALL IONS IN P.P.M.
at Field  Site  I  during its 11 years  of existence, the con-
clusion is  that  near-surface permeabilities are the control-
ling factor in the extended seepage  time.

The saturated  zone of the Ogallala Formation is 180 feet in
thickness.   The  Triassic immediately underlying the Ogallala
is an aquiclude, as is usual in the  High Plains.  Flow direc-
tion in the Ogallala is normally  toward the east but the
presence  of the  open borehole has resulted in a mound on
the watertable.   The mound is recognizable for a radius of
approximately  800 feet in a southeast direction from Well #9.
The present -difference in head from  epicenter to the south-
east edge of the mound is on the  order of 10 feet.  This
well is pumped intermittently; therefore,  the geometry of
the mound varies with time.

Groundwater chemistry (Table III, page 25) was determined
from sampling  of 19 observation wells.  The real indicators
of runoff reaching the groundwater zone at this site are
the high  N02-N and NH4-N values of Well #9.  Distribution
of "above-normal" N03-N in groundwater (Figure 8) corresponds
to the geometry  of the groundwater mound described previously.

Rate of dispersal of runoff-derived  groundwater has averaged
400 feet/year.  This field rate is reported under conditions
of periodic rainfall-injection and on a recovery-as-needed
basis.

Scalf, Hauser, McMillion, Dunlap  and Keeley (5), and Schneider,
Jones and Wiese  (6) report from short-term induced injection-
recovery  studies of NOj movement  in  the Ogallala Formation
that rates  of  movement under injection exceed the 400 feet/
year value.  Also, these investigators revealed that recovery


                              24

-------
 TABLE  III--GROUNDWATER  CHEMISTRY,  FIELD SITE I
WELL No.
1
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
17
18
19
N03-N
1,3
1,1
1,4
1.0
2.1
1.3
1.0
0.9
7.9
1.1
2.1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.5
3.5
N02-N
0.000
0.009
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.100
0.003
0.600
6.300
0.006
*
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.015
*
*
*
0.003
AM-N
0.00
*
*
*
*
0.00
*
0.00
11.77
0.28
m »
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ORG-N
0.00
*
0.22
0,12
*
0.00
*
3.60
7.00
0.00
*
*
0.11
0.28
*
*
*
*
0.28
CA
12
18
53
83
56
11
12
18
58
68
10
10
.78
/7
11
36
10
11
80
He
11
18
29
30
52
15
63
17
11
78
79
39
30
26
71
17
11
15
27
NA
31
33
31
29
78
20
28
16
15
20
29
27
36
*
25
31
11
25
*
K
8
10
9
9
7
8
8
8
12
11
11
7
10
•
11
10
10
10
*
CL
70
31
22
61
110
16
23
51
71
170
61
25
52
10
28
23
25
32
52
SO/,
60
110
7
26
100
10
*
10
10
10
*
10
21
20
*
*
*
*
25
COND.
735
617
855
685
765
680
660
600
735
1010
660
690
680
610
610
190
610
615
558
PH
7.3
7.5
7.3
7.8
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.5
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.8
7.8
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.9
ALL VALUES IN P.P.M. EXCEPT CONDUCTANCE AND pH,  CONDUCTANCE IN MICROMHOS
                           25

-------
                                                    LEGEND


                                                   •3 WELL
                                                  —6— RRM. HOf-H

                                                  :^= ROAD
FIGURE  8--DISTRIBUTION OF NOs-N IN GROUNDWATER,
                   FIELD SITE  I
                        26

-------
of injected NC>3 is related closely to volume of water recov-
ered during pumping.  Even though very high concentrations
of dissolved solids in runoff have flowed to the groundwater
zone at this site, high concentrates do not exist at great
distances from the borehole.  This relationship is due es-
sentially to volume recovery of high IDS concentrates near
the bore hole, and due to dilution away from the point source
of injection.

Field Site II.  Location of observation wells of Field Site
II are shown in Figure 9.  Site II is a 19-year feedlot with
a one-time cattle capacity of 8,000 head.  A playa collects
runoff from the feedlot and, in periods of high rainfall,
runoff flows southwestward down an intermittent drainage
channel.  Water stands in the playa except for relatively
long dry periods.  Drainage slope of the feedpen is approxi-
mately one percent.

The Ogallala Formation crops out at the surface.  The feed-
pen surface is soil covered, and below this lies a caliche
"caprock."  The caliche is breached in the deepest part of
the playa.  The playa fill consists of 5 feet of dense, im-
permeable clay below which lies 15 feet of clay-silt and
secondary nodular caliche.  The lake fill overlies fine-grain,
clean sand of the Ogallala Formation that typically under-
lies the small playas in the High Plains (Figure 10).  Con-
stant head permeability values of the unsaturated zone range
between 1.0 X 10"4 cm/sec to 4.7 X 10~3 cm/sec (Figure H).
Playa lake clay permeability is 10'~7 cm/sec, or less.

Surface material is the only impediment to seepage of feed-
lot runoff at this locality.  Seepage occurs at this site
as indicated by core chemistry (Table IV) and degreee of
saturation (66-87%) above the watertable.

Field Site II has been in existence for 19 years; depth to
the watertable at this location averages 115 feet.  Theoreti-
cally, average rates of seepage have exceeded 6.0 feet/year.
As stated, the minimum permeability of the Ogallala is 1.0
X 10'4 to 4.7 X 10~3 cm/sec (exceeds 100 ft/yr).  In prac-
tical terms, average field seepage rates are controlled by
near-surface seepage rates; the actual rate is indeterminable.

An average 200 foot saturated zone occurs within the Ogallala
Formation in this area; the underlying Triassic serves as
an aquiclude.  As is typical in the High Plains, groundwater
flow is to the southeast.

Groundwater-quality parameters (Table V) for this site were
established from 14 observation wells.  Nitrate-nitrogen
values in groundwater range from 0.8 to 7.9 parts per million.
                             27

-------
FIGURE 9--DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVATION WELLS,
                FIELD SITE II
                     28

-------
   Elev.
   3325
   3300- "-
   3275-
   3250-
   3225-
       FIGURE 10--GAMMA LOG PROFILES, FIELD SITE  II
  FEET
  BELOW
  L.S.D.
   0-
  20-
  40-
  60-
  80-
 100-
 120-
GAMMA LOG
  WELL  9
  RELATIVE
  GRAIN SIZE
 DISTRIBUTION      V8
    (mm.)
.25       .005  .45  .60 .75
   p%       K-cm. secT1

31 35  40   I0~2 IO"3 I0~* IO"5
 ill   iii
                                  t"
                                                          h-
              RADIATION .
              INCREASING
                     J3RAIN SIZE   .,-.,,.
                     INCREASING   V01D
                        III   III

                        POROSITY  -.PERMEABILITY
                        POROSITY    INCREASING
FIGURE  11--SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS,  FIELD  SITE II
                                   29

-------
      TABLE IV--CORE  CHEMISTRY, WELL #9, FIELD SITE II

  FEET BELOW
   L.S.D.    N03-N  N02-N   An-N   ORG-N    CA  KG NA  K   CL SO/j  TDS   pH  % MOIST
0.0
4.5
6.5
9.5
12.0
18.0
25.0
46.0
61.0
73.0
83.0
94.0
114.0
374.20
1 co on
152.80
76.20
67.72
65.69
43.54
72.57
14.64
26.68
0
0
13.94
13.36
0
5.39
3 TO
.32
2.40
0.95
*
2.44
1.69
1.49
1.88
0.69
•1.07
1.23
1.51
1.06
114.60
9.40
37.54
20.23
8.94
8.94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10556.80
3476.00
531.50
227.60
123.70
301.40
130.30
1.29
184.27
128.50
15.74
35.58
149.41
32.65
*
108
68
44
72
84
60
120
84
64
60
128
68
*
41
29
34
22
46
34
46
39
32
36
46
68
*
*
42
30
38
30
28
30
12
32
32
14
12
*
*
86
71
78
43
38
36
28
26
26
32
34
*
383
220
170
220.
188
142
262
167
156
149
230
230
*
*
25
25
25
25
25
75
25
75
25
25
25
14700
It
1764
1176
1000
1176
1118
942
647
559
471
529
647
588
*
*
7.3
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.3
7.2
7.3
8.4
25.7
25.5
16.1
13.5
21.7
21.7
22.4
14.8
13.6
17.4
18.5
15.0
17.3
     ALL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION VALUES REPORTED AS DRY WEIGHT: ALL IONS IN P.P.M.
Nitrate-nitrogen  values  beneath this site are below the maxi-
mum value for  the immediate area; therefore, NOg-N indepen-
dently is not .prima facie evidence of seepage.  However,  Ca,
Mg, Cl, and  conductance  values (Well #10, Table V) show that
seepage is detectable  in groundwater below the feedlot site.
The relatively high chloride (Well #10) is not detectable
for more than  800-900  feet away from the epicenter of the
playa collection  system  (Figure 12).  Assuming that runoff
could have reached the groundwater zone within the first  year
the site was in operation, the minimum rate of dispersal  in
groundwater  has been approximately 45 feet/year.  Permeability
values of the  Ogallala indicate that minimum seepage time
would be 2-3 years; therefore, minimum dispersal rates would
be on the order of 55  feet/year.

Field Site III.   Location of observation wells of Field Site
III are shown  in  Figure  13.  This site is four years old  with
a one-time cattle capacity of 4,000 head.  The operation  is
located on a stream, the stream channel serving as the col-
lection system for runoff.  Runoff collects in a low, dredged-
out area of  the channel, with the system overflowing during
periods of high rainfall.  Drainage slope in the feedpens
is 3-4$, and the  stream  channel has a gradient of less than
ten degrees.


                              30

-------
TABLE V--GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY,  FIELD SITE II
WELL No.
1
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
11
15
N03-N
1,2
1.2
7.9
7.1
5.0
3.3
2.8
1.7
5.0
2.5
2.5
1.3
1.8
0.8
N02-N
*
*
*
0.060
0.009
0.006
0.015
0.031
0.020
0.100
0.009
0.006
*
0.000
AM-N
0.00
*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
*
0.00
*
0.00
ORG-N
0.00
*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
*
0.00
*
0.70
CA
16
16
16
16
16
51
15
51
71
10
10
51
22
10
MG
16
15
15
11
16
16
51
35
85
11
51
28
11
55
NA
21
37
10
21
21
28
32
33
21
11
22
80
10
82
K
10
10
11
10
10
13
9
11
10
10
10
11
10
8
CL
53
52
53
61
15
59
52
50
89
53
53
60
26
37
SOj,
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
*
100
COND.
6.17
650
588
617
676
618
627
599
1029
620
735
559
620
791
pH
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.7
7.2
  ALL VALUES IN P.P.M.  EXCEPT CONDUCTANCE AND pH.  CONDUCTANCE IN MICROMHOS
  9CoRE HOLE
                          31

-------
                                                          WELL
                                                       — 70—RRM. CHLORIDE
                                                       	 ROAD
                                                      0 20O 400600 BOO
                                                         FEET
FIGURE 12--DISTRIBUTION OF CHLORIDE IN  GROUNDWATER,
                      FIELD SITE  II
                           32

-------
                                                         WELL
                                                         TOPOGRAPHIC
                                                          CONTOUR
                                                      	 ROAD
                                                     —	STREAM
                                                   CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
                                                     0 200. 400600

                                                         FEET
FIGURE  13--DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVATION  WELLS,
                  FIELD  SITE  III
                           33

-------
The Ogallala  Formation crops out at the  surface,  with less
than 10' of Pleistocene "cover sand"  and soil overlying the
Ogallala caliche "caprock."  The caliche is  within the feed-
pens but is breached in the low part  of  the  stream channel.
Subsurface lithology (Figure 14) consists of zones of clay,
silt, clay-silt mixtures, and zones of fine  to medium-grain
sand typical  of the upper part of  the Ogallala Formation.

Constant head permeability values  in  the unsaturated zone
of the Ogallala at the site range  from 1.9 X 10~5 cm/sec to
1.39 X 10~2 cm/sec (Figure 14).  There are no essentially
impervious stratigraphic units detectable between the surface
and wat.ertable.
FIGURE  15--SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE III
     GAMMA LOG
t&ft"   WELL 20
 0-
  20-
  40-
  60-
  8O-
                          RELATIVE
                          GRAIN SIZE
                         DISTRIBUTION
                           (mm.)
                            r
       Vs        p%       K-cm. see?'

005  .56  .70 .80    35 40 45   Iff2 IO"3 IO"4 KJ5
       ^RADIATION
       INCREASING
                       GRAIN SIZE
                       INCREASING
    VOID RATIO
             POROSITY
^.PERMEABILITY.
  INCREASING
Percentage  saturation values of effective pore space of 75-85%
in several  cores indicate that seepage  does take place.  Also,
core  chemistry (Table VI) indicates  a N03-N profile of 170
p.p.m. near the surface to 11 p.p.m.  at a depth of 80 feet.

The rate  of initial seepage probably is less than horizontal
flow  rates  in the saturated zone,  as  evidenced by the lack
of a  groundwater mound beneath the collection pond.  The depth
of water  at this 4-year-old site ranges from 60-90 feet.
Seepage has reached the groundwater  zone; therefore, the mini-
mum average field seepage rate is  on the order of 15-23 feet/
year.  Minimum permeability values determined in the laboratory
are 20 feet/year.
                               34

-------
 Elev.
3225-.
3200-
 3175-
 3150
 3125
                                                              WELL 18
                                                              el. 3233
                                                               WELL 25
                                                               el. 3235
  Elev.
  3225-
  3200-
  3175-
  3150-
3HAUE.
SHALE,
SAND,
SANDY
SHALE
          FIGURE  14--GAMMA LOG PROFILES,  FIELD SITE  III
                                    35

-------
     TABLE VI--CORE  CHEMISTRY, WELL #20, FIELD SITE III

    FEET BELOW
     L.S.D.      N03-N    N02-M    ORG-N     K      Ci_     % MOIST
2
6
18
21
28
36
37
45
54
68
80
170
68
22
22
22
45
45
50
11
44
11
0,80
0,92
0,44
0,92
0,96
0,52
0,48
0,52
0.76
0,88
0,96
585
85
102
94
23
46
95
51
16
45
212
400
60
40
40
40
40
120
40
40
60
120
567
549
461
461
372
390
355
390
319
337
408
14,3
15,2
14.7
18,3
19,8
16.8
18,1
14,9
16,3
17,0
10.1
   ALL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION VALUES REPORTED AS DRY WEIGHT;  ALL IONS IN P.P.M,
The saturated  zone  in  the  vicinity of Site III is within the
Ogallala Formation  and the underlying Cretaceous limestone.
Saturated thickness is 100 feet and, within this zone, flow
direction is to  the east.

Water-quality  parameters determined from samples from 28 ob-
servation wells  in  the area are shown in Table VII.  N03-N
values in the  vicinity range from 0.7 to 16.7 parts per million,
"Normal" background N03-N  values approximate a range of 0.7
to 7.1 parts per million.   This is the range in values in
the area west  of the feedlot and up-dip on the watertable.

Abnormally high  N03-N  values (distribution, Figure 16) exist
near the feedlot and below the floodplain that exists north
of the feedlot.  The floodplain has been under cultivation
and fertilization for  many years and some of the N03-N in
the groundwater  is  attributed to this practice.  With ground-
water flow to  the east, if the feedlot were the principal
source of N03-N, the influent nitrogen would be expected to
have reached Well #23  (Location, Figure 13) before or by the
time water was degraded in wells numbered 22, 24, and 25.
Wells #23 and  #24 are  more apt to represent distance of move-
ment, which is on the  order of a few hundred feet, with an
average rate of  100 feet/year.
                              36

-------
TABLE  VII--GROUNDWATER  CHEMISTRY,  FIELD  SITE  III
WELL No.
1
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
N03-N
1.1
7.1
2.6
1.2
5.5
1.1
15.7
15.7
15.1
7.9
5.6
1.0
5.8
5.0
3.9
6.7
11.9
16.7
13.5
*
11.7
11.7
0.9
5.0
10.8
5.0
0.7
3.9
3.1
N02-N
*
0.160
0.009
0.100
0.020
0.006
0.600
0.530
0.030
0.130
0.009
0.003
*
*
0.010
0.009
0.020
0.060
0.210
•
0.009
0.009
0.000
0.070
0.012
0,010
0.003
0.010
0.001
AM-N
*
0.28
*
0.28
0.00
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.56
*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.81
0.00
0.00
*
0.56
•
0.00
0.00
0.00
*
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.81
0.00
ORG-H
*
2.23
0.81
1.02
0.83
0.00
0.10
0.10
2.11
1.52
0.00
0.10
*
0.00
1.51
0.00
0.18
0.10
0.00
*
0.10
0.10
*
0.81
0.10
0.11
*
*
0.00
CA
65
91
88
50
60
70
58
50
50
50
51
58
60
82
51
51
50
51
61
*
53
50
18
50
18
58
76
90
11
Me
27
77
H
50
50
58
39
36
51
57
25
26
51
22
51
25
52
55
62
*
28
52
35
69
11
56
60
77
19
NA
51
78
*
59
62
67
59
56
65
57
61
57
78
72
56
59
65
65
57
*
60
63
60
62
58
61
71
78
61
                                                             K       CL     SO,,     COND.     pH

                                                              9      15      *       705     7.1
                                                             16      25      75     1323     7.2
                                                                    150      86      692     7.6
                                                             13      85     100      882     7.1
                                                             13     113      50      911     7.3
                                                             17     117     150     1058     7.3
                                                             11      16      10      765     7.1
                                                             13      32      10      617     7.2
                                                             12      50      52      882     7.3
                                                             21      61      80      613     7.3
                                                             17      60      10     1058     7.2
                                                             16      67      10      735     7.3
                                                             18     121      10      911     7.3
                                                             22     112      80      853     7.1
                                                             13     103      50      882     7.1
                                                             17      82      10      821     7.2
                                                             13      71     100     1100     7.1
                                                             12      58      *      1010     7.3
                                                             15      57      10      617     7.1
                                                             *       *        *       *        *
                                                             17      50             821     7.1
                                                             16      59      75      821     7.3
                                                             15      69      «5      618     7.1
                                                             21      92      80      658     7.2
                                                             12      57     100      706      7.3
                                                             11      30     100     1069      7,1
                                                             17     138     100     1058      7.2
                                                             15     138     125     1176      7.2
                                                             12      59     280      730      7.1
  ALL VALUES IN P.P.M. EXCEPT CONDUCTANCE AND pH.  CONDUCTANCE IN MICROMHOS
  20CoRE HOLE
                                     37

-------
                                    \     \  \   \
FIGURE 16--DISTRIBUTION OF N03-N IN GROUNDWATER,
                 FIELD SITE III
                       38

-------
Field Site IV.  Field Site  IV  observation wells are shown
in Figure 17.  This location has  been in use for 16 years
with a one-time capacity of 4,500 cattle.  Runoff from this
site collects in a playa.

The Ogallala Formation crops out  at  the surface.  Playa
sediments are 10 feet in thickne.ss,  including a 4-foot upper
clay layer.  The clay layer of the playa is relatively im-
permeable at the cored location (Well #7).  Typical subsur-
face lithologies of the Ogallala  are depicted in Figure 18.

Nine cores were taken in the Ogallala Formation beneath the
pond, and representative analyses indicate a constant head
permeability range in value of 5.27  X 10"^ cm/sec to 1.03
X 10-3 cm/sec (Figure 19).

Core chemistry (Table VIII) indicates that N03 has penetrated
to a depth of at least 46 feet, and  other ions show a decreas-
ing trend to the watertable.   Calcium,  potassium, and conduc-
tivity values decrease sharply below 11 feet.  Based on N03-N,
the field seepage rate has  been no more than 3-4 feet/year.


   TABLE VIII--CORE CHEMISTRY,  WELL  #7, FIELD SITE IV
FEET BELOW
L.S.D.'
2.5
6
11
30
16
57
68
88
110
N03-N
0.00
12.15
13.01
*
13.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N02-N
1.10
1.59
1.25
*
1.18
1.68
1.29
1.13
1.01
AM-N
0.00
0.00
0.00
*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ORG-N
113
33
67
*
0
171
32
65
32
CA
*
81
88
31
32
28
21
16
21
MG
*
26
26
13
31
36
18
16
16
NA
*
68
38
60
8
11
18
33
32
K
*
30
11
27
22
17
11
10
10
CL
*
230
212
117
78
78
69
53
62
S01
*
80
10
10
80
10
10
10
80
TDS
*
1058
1000
617
588
529
112
617
382
pH
*
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.5
% MOIST
11.2
9.3
13.1
*
15.3
18.9
15.0
15.2
15.2
      ALL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION VALUES REPORTED AS DRY WEIGHT; ALL IONS IN P.P.M.
                           39

-------
FIGURE 17--DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVATION WELLS,
                FIELD SITE IV
                     40

-------
                       WELL 7
                       el. 3392
    Elev.
   3375-
   3350-
   3325-
   3300-
   3325-
       FIGUKE  18--GAMMA LOG PROFILES,  FIELD  SITE IV
  FEET   GAMMA LOG
  BELOW     WELL 7
  L.S.D.
  0-
  ao-
  40-
  60-
  80-
         RADIATION^
         INCREASING
RELATIVE
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
(mm.)
.25 .005 JS
^GRAIN SIZE v
vs
0 75 1.0 3
1 i
1
1 1
010 RATIO F
p% K-cm. sec
5 45 50 I0~s I0~4 1C
ii ii
m^^m •^••^B
ii ii
npneiTV PERMEABILI1
I
r5
•y
                           INCREASING
                                                               INCREASING
FIGURE 19--SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS,  FIELD  SITE  IV


                               41

-------
The saturated zone of the Ogallala Formation is 200 feet
in thickness.  Within this zone, 21 wells were used to col-
lect water samples for chemical analyses (Table IX).  In
terms of NC^-N, the range in normal background N03-N is 0.7
p.p.m. to 4.7 parts per million.  Seepage has not reached
the groundwater at this site.

Field Site V.  The surface layout of Site V is shown in Fig-
ure 20.  This site has been in operation for 3-5 years and
has a one-time capacity of 17,000 head of cattle.  The ca-
pacity was 4,000 cattle in the 1940 Ts, 7-10,000. head in the
1950's, and 15-17,000 head of cattle in the 1960's.  Runoff
collects in a playa, and the playa water in turn is pumped
outside the basin for purposes of irrigation.  Feedpen drain-
age slopes average 1-2 percent.

The Ogallala Formation crops out in the feedpens.  A caliche
layer exists near the surface, and below this is a typical
Ogallala section (Figure 21).  The playa is filled with sedi-
ment to a depth of about 20 feet.

Constant head permeability values within the Ogallala range
from essentially non-pervious to 3.2 X 10~3 cm/sec (Figure
22).  The geologic section at this site is less permeable
than any of the other sites described in the report.

Core chemistry (Well #9, Table X, p. 46) indicates that per-
haps NO 3 has not reached the water table beneath the pond;
however, groundwater chemistry  (Table XI, Wells 4, 5, 9,
11, 13) indicates some seepage of N03 has occurred.  The
depth to water is 110-115 feet; thus, the 35-year-old-site
exhibits an average minimum field rate of infiltration of
about 3 feet/year.  This falls within the range of laboratory
determined permeability values for the site.

The saturated zone at the site is within the Ogallala Forma-
tion, and groundwater chemistry was determined from 16 obs.er-
vation wells penetrating this zone.  N03-N values  (distribu-
tion, Figure 23) range from 0.8 to 8.4 parts per million;
N03-N values exceeding 5 p.p.m. are above normal at the site.
Rate of dispersal of NOs-N in groundwater has been less than
100  ft/year.


Other Sites
A minimum of five and a maximum of 25 groundwater samples from
beneath each of  75 additional feedlots were chemically ana-
lyzed.  Distributive groundwater geometry of NO-j-N  (and other
ions) derived from feedlot runoff was determinable  from about
15 to 20 of these sites.  The maximum detectable distance of
                            42

-------
TABLE IX--GROUNDWATER  CHEMISTRY,  FIELD SITE  IV
WELL No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
NOj-N
0.8
1.4
2.3
2.5
2.8
1,7
1.60
2.1
1.9
0.7
3.5
1.4
3.6
1.43
2.1
4.1
2.5
4.7
4.2
2.1
1.7
N02-N
*
*
*
0.120
0.300
0.006
0.030
0.006
*
*
0.200
»
0.060
0.010
0.006
0.006
0.560
0.240
0.160
0.760
*
AM-N
*
*
*
0
0
0
0
0
*
*
1.96
»
0
0
*
*
0.28
0
0
0
1.96
ORG-N
*
*
*
0
0
0
2.0
0
*
*
0
#
0
4.87
*
*
0
0
0
0
0
CA
44
34
45
44
48
50
54
46
43
38
56
45
40
64
50
43
46
42
40
44
48
KG
39
55
48
39
38
55
57
34
37
57
38
35
36
52
55
47
40
45
43
35
34
NA
32
31
37
31
33
29
11
36
35
35
41
54
50
21
30
35
41
31
34
33
40
K
10
11
9
9
9
11
11
9
11
10
8
9
8
8
10
11
9
9
7
9
8
CL
27
44
34
57
46
39
43
41
39
21
39
64
50
41
43
47
53
50
57
43
43
SO,,
*
140
*
40
40
40
20
40
*
*
40
*
40
20
*
*
40
40
40
40
40
COND.
720
- 700
550
647
588
647
663
647
740
540
588
640
588
595
676
650
559
559
588
588
559
pH
7.3
7.4
7.6
7.2
7.4
7.2
7.6
7.2
7.8
7.5
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
*
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
   ALL VALUES IN P.P.M.  EXCEPT CONDUCTANCE AND pH,  CONDUCTANCE IN MICROMHOS X
                          43

-------
                                                         WELL
                                                     ~irm— TOPOGRAPHIC
                                                      3710  CONTOUR
                                                      	ROAD
                                                    CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
FIGURE  20--DISTRIBUTION OF  OBSERVATION WELLS,
                   FIELD  SITE  V
                          44

-------
   Elev.
   3725-
   3700-
   3675-
   3650-
   3625-
   3600-
          S":TLSHALE      CLAYEY SAND
           SAND
 FEET
BELOW
 L.S.D.
 0-
20-
40-
60-
80-
120-
140-
        FIGURE  21--GAMMA LOG PROFILES,  FIELD  SITE V
6AMMA LOG
 WELL 9
              RADIATION
              INCREASING
                   .25
 RELATIVE
 GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
   (mm.)
                                                            p%
                      ^GRAIN SIZE
                       INCREASING
                 I   I       i

             VOID RATIO  POROSITY
  K-cm. secT1

Iff4 iff5 Iff6 iff7
PERMEABILITY
  INCREASING
FIGURE  22--SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGIC  PARAMETERS,  FIELD SITE V

                                   45     __

-------
       TABLE X--CORE CHEMISTRY, WELL #9, FIELD  SITE V
  FEET BELOW  N03-N  N02-N   AM-N    ORG-N  CA  MG  NA   K  CL S0a  IDS  pH  % MOIST
    L.S.D.                                          4
3.5
9
17
22
29
35
13
58
72
84
98
110
21.16
11.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.31
0.00
12.49
73.62
12.59
12. SI
0.00
0.99
1.15
0.80
1.00
1.04
0.98
1.03
1.06
0.61
1.16
1.09
1.13
0.00
0.00
7.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
13.98
46.30
22.68
78.41
65.00
5.35
46.12
17.11
0.00
17.47
97.33
47.84
54
52
40
40
34
36
36
50
38
48
30
26
26
16
24
27
21
22
18
23
19
19
10
13
25
13
38
50
48
50
31
24
12
18
13
15
11
7
9
18
9
10
11
13
9
10
6
7
106
96
71
115
124
113
99
82
64
64
57
60
40
40
80
40
60
60
40
160
80
120
60
60
412
588
529
529
588
588
529
559
441
471
324
353
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.2
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.3
6.6
5.7
*
11.8
15.2
14.2
11.1
9.6
8.0
10 3
11.9
14.8
      ALL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION VALUES REPORTED AS DRY WEIGHT; ALL IONS IN P.P.M.
travel of NOj-N in the groundwater zone was on  the  order
of 1500 feet.   It is concluded, dissolved solids  concentrated
in Ogallala  groundwater from point-sources such as  cattle
feedlots usually are restricted to the vicinity of  the  site.

To determine relative field rates of seepage on a regional
basis, several  chemical parameters were evaluated in  terms
of ages of feedlots.  The values used to derive the graph
shown in Figure 24 represent maximum values of  N03-N  in ground-
water beneath each of 80 feedlots.  Each feedlot  used repre-
sents 5 to 25 groundwater analyses, and the high  and  low
maxima for each year represent 5 to 70 determinations of
N03-N.  The  dashed line shows the base level for"NC>3-N  be-
neath Texas  High Plains feedlots.  This base level  has  not
been corrected  for "normal" background levels in  the  Ogal
lala before  establishment of the feedlots; therefore, the
base level for  feedlot N03-N contribution is less than  shown.
The base line shows a general increasing trend  in N03-N con-
centration with age.  The upper (solid) line of Figure  24


                              46

-------
TABLE XI--GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY, FIELD  SITE  V
WELL No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
NOrN
1.1
2.3
2.4
5.7
5.0
3.6
1,4
1.0
6.4
1.0
8.4
1.0
5.2
2.7
0.8
4.17
N02-N
*
*
*
*
»
0.000
*
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.012
*
0.099
*
*
*
AM-N
*
*
*
*
*
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CA
56
64
80
54
64
67
65
64
65
56
65
60
74
68
92
68
MG
52
37
36
60
61
59
37
62
60
52
52
33
80
29
47
40
NA
59
39
72
60
60
64
65
57
59
58
57
44
52
85
52
52
K
9
12
13
15
10
12
14
15
16
8
11
10
15
11
16
10
CL
78
195
124
72
85
85
125
85
95
85
50
82
174
124
195
103
so/,
145
40
40
140
150
*
*
*
*
40
*
40
134
40
40
40
COND.
880
1150
882
890
790
706
995
706
805
735
794
706
1215
1000
941
735
PH
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.6
7.4
*
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.2
7.4
7.2
7.2
7.2
  ALL VALUES IN P.P.M. EXCEPT CONDUCTANCE AND pH.  CONDUCTANCE IN MICROMHOS
                         47

-------
\
       \
     2   \

                                                       LEGEND
—s— RPM. NO,-N

	ROAD
  FIGURE 23--DISTRIBUTION OF N03-N IN GROUNDWATER,
                     FIELD SITE V
                          48

-------
represents the highest maximum level of N03-N found in all
lots for each year shown.  As with the base line, it has not
been corrected for "normal" background N03-N.  The upper line
tends toward considerable variation in age concentration re-
lationships and indicates that, disregarding age, some lots
contribute N03-N to the groundwater zone of the High Plains.

The average slope of the N03-N base line (dashed) is about
0.17 p.p.m. NC>3-N per year.  The maximum slope value is 0.3
p.p.m. N03-N per year.  These approximated rates represent
point-sources beneath all feedlots in the study and have no
significance for a specific geographic location.  In conclu-
sion, these values approximate a regional rate of concentra-
tion of NC>3-N in Ogallala groundwater from cattle feedlots .

Additional profiles are shown for chloride (Figure 25) and
conductivity values (Figure 26) beneath the 80 feedlots .
The profiles show slopes of 0.07-0.40 p.p.m. Cl/year and an
increase in conductivity of 40-100 micromhos/cm/year,
respectively.  These data also reflect field infiltration
rates as described for NO^-N.
                           49

-------
en
o
                 	LOWEST MAXIMUM NO,-N
          £1950
1955
                                                       I960

                                             YEAR FEEDLOT ESTABLISHED
                                              1965
1970
                FIGURE 24--AGE OF FEEDLOTS INVESTIGATED vs. RANGE  IN  MAXIMUM NO,-N
                                   -CONCENTRATION  IN GROUNDWATER                  3

-------
Cn
        2SI3




         \2




          II


       O

       x 10

       5
       Q.

       £  9


       d
       z  p
       o  8
       o

       ai  _
       Q  7

       o:
       o
       -J  c
       x  6
       o
       E  4

       LJ



       1  3
       DC


          2




          I
HIGHEST MAX. Cl


LOWEST MAX.  Cl
               J	I
         «I950
      J	I	I	I	I	I	I	I
                         I	I
     1955
           I960

YEAR  FEEDLOT ESTABLISHED
1965
1970
              FIGURE 25--AGE OF  FEEDLOTS INVESTIGATED  ZS. RANGE Ifl MAXIMUM CHLORIDE

                                   CONCENTRATION OF  GROUNDWATER

-------
in
         (x|00)
          28
                       HIGHEST MAX. COND.
                 	LOWEST MAX. COND.
           a I960
1955
           I960
YEAR  FEEDLOT  ESTABLISHED
1965
1970
                  •FIGURE  26--AGE OF FEEDLOTS  INVESTIGATED ys. RANGE  IN  MAXIMUM
                                   CONDUCTANCE  OF  GROUNDWATER

-------
                     ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


William D. Miller, Professor and Chairman, Geosciences
Department, Texas Tech University, served as principal
investigator and assumes sole responsibility for the scien-
tific accuracy of the results herein reported.

Special acknowledgment is due the feedlot owners and managers
of the Texas High Plains who generously allowed us full use
of their facilities, often for many days at a time.  Their
generosity is especially gratifying due to the public outcry
over potential pollution by feedlots.

The Projects Division and Materials Testing Laboratory of
the Texas Water Development Board were major contributors
to the total project.  The core-drill  crew from the Projects
Division, TWDB, included James W. Sansom, Jr., Geologists
and Crew Chief; Keith Keppel and Leon  Byrd, Geologists; Lewis
Barnes, Chief Driller, Hugo Walker and Lynn Jorgensen, Assis-
tant Drillers.  Materials Testing Laboratory personnel who
contributed to the field work and who  performed laboratory
investigations of cores are Messrs. Paul Pasemann, Ronnie
Weddell, Joe Gates, Steve Gifford, all Engineering Techni-
cians, and Mike Howard, Technician, Structure Section.

Messrs. G. S. Sawyer, Projects Division Director, J. E. Hunt,
Chief, Materials Testing Lab, and James 0. Rodgers, Engineer,
were instrumental in the planning phase of the project.
Appreciation is also extended to Mr. C. R. Baskin, Chief
Engineer, Mr. Seth Burnitt, Water Quality, and Mr. R. C.
Peckham, Head, Ground Water division,  Texas Water Develop-
ment Board, for their assistance with  planning and implemen-
tation of portions of the project.

Recognition is given for financial support of the project
to the Texas Cattle Feeders Association, Mr. Lloyd Bergsma,
Executive Director, and the TCFA Board of Directors, Mr. Bob
Carter, President.

The North Plains Water Di-strict (Texas), J. W. Buchanan,
Manager, contributed financial support, and SP-logging equip-
ment for logging in the North Plains.

Messrs. Dennis Bell, Chief Research Assistant, and John Buchanan,
David Normand and Bill Watson, Student Research Assistants,
Geoscience Department, Texas Tech University, contributed
to the field and laboratory investigations.
                           53

-------
Mr. Clyde Wilson, Acting Project Chief, Bill Sandeen-, Physi-
cal Science Technologist, and Jim Smith, Hydrologist, U. S.
Geological Survey, Lubbock, Texas, performed the well logging
reported in this study.

The initiation and major support of the project by the En-
vironmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma, and the sup-
port by the Project Director, Mr. Marion R. Scalf, are grate-
fully appreciated.
                               54

-------
                    REFERENCES CITED
1.  Carter, W. T., "The Soils of Texas," Texas  Agricultural
    Experiment Station, Bull 431, (1931).

2.  Lotspeich, F. B.,  and Coover, J.  R., "Soil  Forming  Fac-
    tors on the Llano  Estacado:   Parent  Material,  Time  and
    Topography," Texas Journal Science,  Vol.  XIV,  No. 1,
    (1962) .

3.  Lehman, 0. R., Steward,  B. A.,  and Mathers, A.  C.,  "Seep-
    age of Feedyard Runoff Water Impounded in Playas,"  Texas
    A§M - Texas Agricultural Experiment  Station, MP-944, pp
    1-7 (1970) .

4.  Hauser, V. L., "Hydrology, Conservation,  and Management
    of Runoff Water in Playas on the  Southern High Plains,"
    USDA Conservation  Res. Report,  No. 8 (1966).

5.  Scalf,  M. R,, Hauser, V. L., McMillion, L.  G.,  Dunlap,
    W. J.,  and Keeley, J. W., "Fate of DDT and  Nitrate  in
    Groundwater," USDI, FWPCA, R. S.  Kerr Water Research
    Center, (1968).

6.  Schneider, A. D.,  Jones, 0.  R., and  Wiese,  A.  F-, "Pollu-
    tion Research in Recharging the Ogallala  Aquifer Through
    Well.s," Ogallala Aquifer Symposium,  ICASALS, Texas  Tech
    University, (1970).
                           55

-------
1

5
Accession Number
2

Organization
Geosciences
Stibjet-t Field St. Group
SELECTED WATER RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
Department

             Texas Tech University
     Title
             INFILTRATION  RATES  AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY BENEATH  CATTLE
             FEEDLOTS, TEXAS  HIGH PLAINS
  10
     Authors)
             William D.  Miller
     Geoscience Department
     Texas Tech University
     Lubbock, Texas  79410
                              16
                                 Project Designation
                                 EPA Project #16060EGS
                              21
                                 Note
  22
     Citation
  23
   Descriptors (Starred First)
     Groundwater, nitrates*,  feedlot runoff*, infiltration*
  25
     Identifiers (Starred First)
     nitrates*,  feedlot runoff,  infiltration
                    field  and laboratory studies o± tive teediots were  conducted
     to determine field seepage rates and distributive geometry of infiltrated
runoff.  Practical  field  seepage rates at these sites ranged  from  2  to 20 feet/
year.
  Nitrogen  (NO,, N02,  NH4,  Org-N)  and common chemical parameters  (Ca,  Mg, Na,
K, Cl, 804, TDS, pH,  and  conductance) were determined in  cores and groundwater
samples; based on groundwater analyses from 80 Texas High Plains  feedlots,
rates of concentration of N03-N and Cl in groundwater beneath feedlots range
from 0.07 to 0.4 p.p.m. per year,  and average 0.17 p.p.m. per year.
  Laboratory determined constant head vertical permeability of cores from 22
feedlot sites revealed a  range in values of 10"2 to 10~"  cm/sec for Ogallala
sediments,  10~4 .to  10'7 cm/sec for near-surface material  of floodplains and
feedpen-runoff surfaces,  and values of 10'6 to-10'8 cm/sec for playa clay.
  Factors related to  runoff-infiltration were correlated  with groundwater
quality, and it was determined that local surficial material  and  regional soils
patterns are closely  related to quality of groundwater beneath feedlots.
Direct correlation  of water quality does not exist with feedpen-runoff slope,
cattle load, and surface-area ratios of drainage basin to collection system.
27
  Abstre
   wTlliam D. Miller    I
                           Institution
                                  Texas Tech University
   WR: 102 (REV. JULY 19S9I
   WRSIC
                                      SEND TO: WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
                                            U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                            WASHINGTON. D. C. 20240
                                                                   « OPO: 1969-359

-------