&EPA
            United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
           Industrial Environmental Research
           Laboratory
           Cincinnati OH 45268
EPA-600/2-80-059
April 1980
             Research and Development
Laboratory and Field
Evaluation of IMS-100
Reverse Osmosis
Membrane

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination of traditional  grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
 NOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and dem-
 onstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent en-
 vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This work
 provides the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
 of pollution sources to meet environmental quality  standards.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                              EPA-600/2-80-059
                                              April 1980
      LABORATORY AND FIELD EVALUATION
     OF  NS-100  REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE
                     by
    Kenneth J.  McNulty,  Donald C.  Grant,
  John R.  Harland and Robert L.  Goldsmith
       Walden Division of Abcor, Inc.
      Wilmington, Massachusetts  01887
                    for
   American Electroplaters'  Society, Inc.
        Winter Park, Florida  32789
             Grant No.  R803753
              Project Officer

              Mary K. Stinson
   Industrial  Pollution Control  Division
Industrial  Environmental  Research Laboratory
          Edison, New Jersey 08817
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          CINCINNATI, OHIO  45268

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER

     This report has been reviewed by the Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory-Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                                     ii

-------
                                 FOREWORD

     When energy and material resources are extracted, processed, converted,
and used, the related pollutional impacts on our environment and even on
our health often require that new and increasingly more efficient pollution
control methods be used.  The Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory-
Cincinnati (lERL-Ci) assists in developing and demonstrating new and improved
methodologies that will  meet these needs both efficiently and economically.

     This report is a product of the above efforts.  It was undertaken to
demonstrate the effectiveness and economic feasibility of using reverse
osmosis for closed-loop control of metal finishing rinse wastes uder actual
plant conditions.  The reverse osmosis system concentrates the chemicals for
return to the processing bath while purifying the wastewater for reuse in the
rinising operation.  The results of the report are of value to R & D programs
concerned with the treatment of wastewaters from various metal finishing,
non-ferrous metal, steel, inorganic, and other industries.  Further informa-
tion concerning the subject can be obtained by contacting the Metals and
Inorganic Chemicals Branch of the Industrial Pollution Control Division.
                             David G. Stephan
                                 Director
                Industrial Environmental  Research Laboratory
                                Cincinnati

-------
                                  ABSTRACT

     Laboratory-'life tests were conducted with B-9 and NS-100 reverse osmosis
(RO) membranes treating zinc cyanide plating solution at ten percent of bath
strength.  The B-9 membrane was degraded by the high pH of the solution,
which was beyond the upper pH limit (pH 11) recommended for this membrane.
The NS-100 membrane showed little deterioration in performance over the first
500 hours of operation.  A reduction in permeate flux and rejection after 500
hours appeared to be caused by the precipitation of salts that resulted from
operation in the closed loop test system and would not be expected in actual
field operation.

     At the New England Plating Company, field tests were conducted treating
rinsewater from the zinc cyanide plating operation with a module of seven
tubular NS-100 reverse osmosis membranes.  Conductivity rejections of 80-96
percent and zinc rejections of 96-99 percent were measured at flux levels of
0.20-0.37 m3/m2/day (5-9 gal/ft2/day).  During 2,300 hours of exposure
to the rinsewater, the membrane showed no degradation in performance as
determined by NaCl performance tests and standard tests with a solution of
zinc cyanide plating bath diluted to five percent of bath strength.

     Because of the high cost per unit membrane area of tubular RO modules, a
number of attempts were made to fabricate a NS-100 spiral-wound module.
These attempts were all unsuccessful, and it is concluded that a more exten-
sive development program will be required before the NS-100 membrane can be
offered commercially in an economically attractive configuration.  Recently,
a new membrane similar to the NS-100 has been developed in a spiral-wound
configuration.  This membrane, designated PA-300, shows promise of super-
ceding the NS-100 membrane for plating waste applications.

     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. R803753 by the
American Electr'oplaters' Society, Inc. under the sponsorship of'the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.  This report covers the period June 1, 1975
to April 15, 1976 and work was completed as of June 1, 1978.

-------
                             CONTENTS
Foreword	iii
Abstract	iv
Figures	vi
Tables   	T	vi
Acknowledgment 	  vii
     1.  Introduction  	   1
     2.  Conclusions   	   3
     3.  Recommendations 	   4
     4.  Laboratory Life Tests with NS-100 and B-9 Membranes .  .   5
     5.  Field Test of the NS-100 Membrane	13
     6.  Fabrication of NS-100 Spiral-Wound Modules  	  26
References	27

-------
                             FIGURES
Number                                                          Page
  1      Flow schematic for laboratory life test system ....   6
  2      Schematic drawing of a B-9 mini-permeator  	   7
  3      Rejections and productivities vs. operating time for
         the NS-100 and B-9 membranes   	10
  4      Abcor spiral wound membrane module 	  14
  5      Flow schematic for field test system	15
  6      Rejection for membrane Jl at 5% of bath strength ...  18
  7      Rejection for membrane J2 at 5% of bath strength ...  19
  8      Rejection for membrane J3 at 5% of bath strength ...  20
  9      Flux at 5% of bath strength	21
 10      Conductivity rejections obtained during standard tests
         with sodium chloride	22
 11      Fluxes obtained during standard sodium chloride
         tests	24

                             TABLES
Number                                                          Page
  1      Membrane Performance During Operation on Actual Zinc
         Cyanide Rinsewater . . . .<	25
                                 vi

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of Mr. Bruce Warner,
New England Plating Co., Worcester, MA for providing samples of zinc cyanide
plating bath for the laboratory life test and for providing the site for
field tests of the NS-100 membrane.

     Technical direction was received throughout the program from the EPA
Project Officer, Ms. Mary K. Stinson, and from the members of the American
Electroplaters1 Society Project Committee:  Mr. Charles Levy, Mr. Jack Hyner,
Mr. Lawrence Greenberg, Mr. Joseph Conoby, Dr. Robert Mattair, Mr. James
Morse, Mr. Herbert Rondeau, and Mr. George Scott.
                                    vii

-------
                                 SECTION 1

                                INTRODUCTION
     The discharge of used rinsewaters from metal finishing operations is a
major source of water pollution in the electroplting industry.  Various
techniques are available for treating the rinsewater generated in the electro-
plating process.  During recent years, increased attention has been focused
on closed-loop systems used to reclaim rinsewater from individual plating
baths.  In these systems, the chemicals dissolved in the rinsewater discharge
are concentrated for return to the plating bath.  The purified water produced
in the process can be reused for rinsing.

     Reverse osmosis (RO) is one of several concentration techniques that can
be used for closed-loop treatment of electroplating rinsewaters.   When
pressurized rinsewater (feed) is brought in contact with a semi-permeable
membrane, water passes through the membrane at a much higher rate than the
dissolved salts.  The process produces a low concentration/high volume
"permeate" stream, which is recycled to the rinsing operation, and a high
concentration/low volume "concentrate" stream, which is returned  to the
plating bath.  Membrane performance is generally characterized in terms of
flux (the flow rate of permeate produced per unit membrane area)  and
rejection (the percent concentration differecne between the feed  and permeate
streams), both measured at specified conditions.  Advantages and  limitations
of RO for closed-loop treatment of electroplating rinsewaters have been
discussed previously (1).

     Preliminary tests have been conducted (1) to assess the applicability of
the commercially available membranes (cellulose acetate and polyamide) to a
variety of different electroplating rinsewaters.  While the membranes were
effective in concentrating dissolved species for all the plating  baths,
membrane life was judged to be insufficient for use in certain rinsewaters
with extremes of pH or high oxidant (chromic acid) levels.

     Several RO field tests have been conducted to determine the  applica-
bility of RO under practical conditions.  These have included:

     — spiral-wound cellulose acetate for treatment of Watts-nickel
        rinsewater (2).

     ~ hollow fiber polyamide for treatment of Watts-nickel rinsewater (3).

     ~ hollow fiber polyamide for treatment of copper cyanide rinsewater (4).
                                     1

-------
These field tests indicate that either the cellulose acetate or polyamide
membrane can be used to treat Watts-nickel rinsewaters, and the economics of
this application can be quite attractive.  On the other hand, treatment of
copper cyanide rinsewaters cannot be considered a proven application since,
during one of two field tests, the rate of membrane deterioration would
result in excessive costs for membrane replacement.

     In general, previous work has indicated that membrane life is critical
in determining the applicability of RO to rinsewater recovery, and that pH is
an important parameter in membrane life.  For the cellulose acetate membrane,
life is generally adequate over a pH range of 2.5-7; for the polyamide
membrane, life is generally  adequate over a pH range of 4-11.

     The objective of the work covered by this report was to, extend the
applicability of RO to the high-pH cyanide rinsewaters.  In particular, zinc
cyanide was selected because of its high pH and its high volume usage in the
plating industry.  Because of the pH limitations of the commercially avail-
able membranes, a non-commercial membrane, NS-100, was to be tested and
developed in a spiral-wound  configuration for electroplating applications.
Previous tests with this membrane have indicated good stability over a pH
range of 1-13 (5).

-------
                                 SECTION 2

                                CONCLUSIONS


     Laboratory life tests indicated that the NS-100 membrane is chemically
resistant to zinc cyanide rinsewater at ten percent bath strength (rinsewater
pH = 12.0-12.5).  On the other hand, the performance of the commercially
available B-9 membrane deteriorated with time, probably as a result of chemical
degradation, since the pH of the test solution was beyond the recommended
range (4-11) for this membrane.

     Membrane fouling, which was observed in the laboratory life tests after
500 hours of operation, was probably the result of the buildup and precipita-
tion of a sparingly soluble salt within the closed-loop test system.  This
type of fouling would not be anticipated in a practical system.

     During a 2300-hour field test with a tubular NS-100 module, flux levels
of 0.20-0.37 m3/m2/day, conductivity rejections of 80-96 percent, and zinc
rejections of 96-99.7 percent, were obtained and remained stable throughout
the test.  There was no degradation of the membrane as determined by a standard
NaCl solution test and a standard test with zinc cyanide solution diluted to 5
percent of bath strength.

     Attempts to fabricate the NS-100 membrane in a spiral-wound configuration
were unsuccessful.  A more extensive development effort will be  required
before the NS-100 membrane can be offered in an economically attractive
configuration for electroplating applications.

-------
                                 SECTION 3

                              RECOMMENDATIONS
     Considering both the imminent commercialization of the PA-300 membrane in
a spiral-wound configuration and the similarity of the PA-300 to the NS-100 in
type and chemistry, tests should be conducted with the PA-300 membrane to
evaluate its performance and stability for treatment of zinc cyanide rinse-
waters.  If the results look promising, field tests should be conducted to
evaluate the performance of spiral-wound PA-300 modules for treatment of
actual zinc cyanide rinsewaters.  (These recommendations are implemented
under EPA Grant Nos. R8043311 and R805300.  Full results will be included in
the final reports for these grants).

     Further development of the NS-100 membrane should be suspended until the
PA-300 and other membrane materials have been evaluated for the treatment
of various electroplating rinsewaters.

-------
                                 SECTION 4

            LABORATORY LIFE TESTS WITH NS-100 AND B-9 MEMBRANES


     The objective of this program was to demonstrate the feasibility of using
RO for closed-loop treatment of the rinsewaters resulting from zinc cyanide
plating operations.  Because of the high pH of zinc cyanide rinsewater, a
laboratory life test was conducted to determine whether the du Pont B-9
polyamide membrane could be used in the field tests.  When this program was
initiated, the polyamide membrane was the only commercially available mem-
brane that could withstand alkaline conditions (pH 4-11).  The other commer-
cially available membranes, namely cellulose acetate and cellulose triace-
tate, are limited to pH values below about 8.0.

     In parallel with these tests, a laboratory life test was conducted with
the NS-100 developmental membrane to determine if this membrane could be used
for the field test in the event that the B-9 membrane was degraded by the
zinc cyanide rinsewater.  The NS-100 membrane has exhibited good stability
over a pH range of 1-13 (5).

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Laboratory Life Test System

     A simplified flow schematic of the test system used for the laboratory
life tests is shown in Figure 1.  A positive displacement pump (Yarway
Cyclophram Model 072) was used to withdraw solution from the feed tank and
pressurize it to 2.8 x 10" N/m^ (400 psig).   The flow rate to the modules
was controlled at 0.12 m3/hr (0.53 gpm) by adjusting the displacement
volume of the pump. The pump discharge pressure was measured, and pressure
pulsations were dampened by an accumulator.   The modules were protected
against over-pressurization by a pressure relief valve and a high pressure
switch.  In addition, the pump was protected against running dry by a low
pressure switch.  Feed passed through a NS-100 tube and a B-9 mini-permeator
in series, with the operating pressure controlled by a back pressure regula-
tor.  Concentrate and both permeates were returned to the feed tank (total
recycle) so that the feed concentration would not vary with time.  The feed
temperature was measured at the pump suction.  Frictional heat input from the
pump was removed by a cooling coil  placed in the feed tank.

Membrane Modules

     The B-9 polyamide membrane was in the form of a mini-permeator.  The
design of a mini-permeator is shown in Figure 2.   The active portion of the
permeator consists of one strand (150 filaments)  of polyamide hollow fibers.

-------
                                        Concentrate
Cooling
Water
                                                                                       BPR
                                /Positive
                                ,Displacement
                                 Pump
         Key:
         T     Temperature Gauge
         ACC   Accumulator
         PRV   Pressure Relief Valve
         HPS   High Pressure Switch
         IPS   Low Pressure Switch
         P     Pressure Gauge
         BPR   Back Pressure Regulator
           Figure 1.   Flow schematic for laboratory  life test system.

-------
Permeate
                                       Epoxy Pot
 1  Strand of
150 Filaments
                                             Stainless
                                           Steel Fitting
                                                              Shell
                                                                                              Concen-
                                                                                              trate
          VA
            ^—  Stainless
                  Steel
                  Fitting
                                Feed
                     Figure 2.   Schematic  drawing of  a B-9  mini-permeator.

-------
The strand  is  looped  as  shown,  and  both  ends  are  sealed  in  an epoxy pot.
Permeate  is withdrawn  from  one  end  of  the  fiber strand after slicing exposes
the open  fiber  ends.   A  normal  four-inch diameter permeator contains about
900,000 filaments;  so  the mini-permeator contains less than 2 x 10~4 of the
surface area of a full-scale module.

     The  NS-100 membrane is formed  by  treating a  polysulfone membrane support
with a solution of  PEI (polyethylenimine)  in  water,  a solution of TDI (2,4-
tolylene  diisocyanate) in hexane, and  heat curing to cross-link the PEI.
Before reaction with  the PEI and TDI,  the  polysulfone membrane is essentially
an ultrafiltration  membrane capable of removing suspended solids and macro-
molecules.  The PEI/TDI/heat-cure treatment causes  a skin to form at the
membrane  surface that  is capable of rejecting smaller molecules and dissolved
salts.  The NS-100  membrane is  supported on the interior wall of an epoxy-
impregnated fiberglass tube 12.7 mm'(0.5 in)  in diameter and 0.61 mm (2.0
ft) long.

Performance Parameters

Productivity—
     The  productivity of a  given module  is the rate at which permeate is
produced  under specific  conditions. Productivity is dependent on tempera-
ture, pressure, and feed concentration at  the membrane surface.  Where slight
variations  in  the operating conditions occurred,  the measured productivity of
the mini-permeator  was corrected to 2.8  x  106 N/m2  (400  psig) and 25°C
 (normal operating conditions for the du  Pont  module) using  data from the
du Pont Technical Information Manual.  Flux is defined as productivity per
 unit membrane  area.

Conversion—
     The  conversion is the  ratio of permeate  flow to feed flow.  For a module
operating at near-zero conversion  (as  were both modules  in  the life test),
the concentrations  of the feed  and  concentrate streams are  nearly the same.
Thus, the concentration  on  the  feed/concentrate side of  the membrane is very
nearly the same as  the feed concentration. On the  other hand, a module
operated  at high conversion will produce a concentrate stream having a higher
concentration  than  the feed stream.  In  this  case,  the average concentration
•on the feed/concentrate side of the membrane  will be substantially higher
than the  feed  concentration.  For two  modules operated at the same pressure,
temperature, and feed concentration, the flux will  be lower for the module
operated  at the higher conversion,  since flux decreases  with increasing
 average concentration on the feed/concentrate side  of the membrane.

Rejection—
     The  rejection  (r) measures the degree to which plating salts are pre-
vented from passing through the membrane.   The rejection depends on the oper-
 ating pressure, the conversion, and the  feed  concentration, and is defined by:
                                      8

-------
                               100 [Cf - Cp]

                                       Cf

               where Cf = feed concentration (conductivity)
                     Cp = permeate concentration (conductivity).

Operating Conditions

     The feed solution used in the life tests was prepared by diluting a
sample of zinc cyanide plating bath from New England Plating Company to ten
percent of bath strength (volumetric basis).  The nominal bath composition is
given below:

          zinc (as metal)      15.0 g/1 (2.0 oz/gal)

          free cyanide         19.5 g/1 (1.6 oz/gal)

          caustic              75.0 g/1 (10 oz/gal)

          carbonate            50-60 g/1 (7-8 oz/gal) avg

          brightener           0.5% (vol)


The test system was operated continuously on the zinc cyanide feed solution,
except during interruptions for maintenance and NaCl performance tests.

     The decline in rejection performance is readily indicated by the NaCl
tests, since rejection is most sensitivve for small univalent ions.  The NaCl
performance tests were conducted every two days to obtain control data on the
membrane flux and rejection.  After disconnecting the zinc cyanide feed tank
and draining the remainder of the system, a feed tank containing a 1,500 mg/1
solution of NaCl  was connected, and the system was operated at 1.8 x 106
N/m2 (400 psig),  2.0 1/min flow rate, and 25°C until steady state was reached.
At this time the NaCl productivity and NaCl rejection were measured for each
module.  The system was drained and returned to closed-loop operation on the
zinc cyanide solution.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

     NaCl rejections and productivities for the two membranes, measured
approximately every 48 hours, are shown in Figure 3 as a function of operat-
ing time.  The productivity for the NS-100 increased over the first 500 hours
from 7 to 8.5 cm3/min.  However, between 500 and 600 hours, the productivity
decreased substantially to only 3.6 cm3/min.  This decrease is largely the
result of membrane fouling.  When the membrane "was cleaned with a two percent
citric acid solution (A),  the productivity was restored to its initial  value.
However, when the productivity again  declined rapidly, a second cleaning with
citric acid (B) increased the productivity but did not restore it to its
initial value.  After treatment with  PT-B, a du Pont proprietary membrane

-------
            A  Cleaned with 2% citric acid at pH 4

            B  Cleaned with 2% citric acid at pH 4

            C  After treatment with PT-B soln.

            D  After treatment with PEI soln. (NS-100 only)
                            300      400     500

                             Operatinq Time  (hrs)
                                                                700     800
 10



  9



  8
Z  4
*->
u
a
-a  ,
o  3

B.


   2




   1



   0
                    NS-100
                                     -£*•
                                     _L
                                              _L
                                                      t      U
          100       200       300      400^      500      600      700H   800


                              Operatinq Time (hrs)
Figure 3.    Rejections and productivities vs.  operating  time

              for the NS-100 and B-9 membranes.
                                  10

-------
"tightening agent," the productivity increased almost to its initial value
(C), but dropped after treatment with a PEI solution (D).

     The productivity for the B-9 membrane decreased rapidly to about one-
third of its initial value and appeared to be leveling off until about 500
hours.  A rapid decline in productivity was again observed between 500 and
600 hours and between 600 and 700 hours.  Only modest improvements in pro-
ductivity were obtained after cleaning and PT-B treatment.

     The rejection for the NS-100 was very stable over the first 500 hours,
but there was a substantial decline in rejection between 500 and 600 hours
and between 600 and 700 hours.  This decline corresponds exactly with the
productivity decline discussed above.  Citric acid cleaning and PEI treatment
restored the rejection of the NS-100 to its initial value.

     The rejection for the B-9 decreased substantially over the life test and
could not be restored by citric acid cleaning or PT-B treatment.  Even over
the first 500 hours, where the rejection for the NS-100 remained constant,
the rejection for the B-9 declined substantially.

     One of the most striking features of these data is the difference in
membrane performance before and after 500 hours of operating time.   Appar-
ently, some type of membrane fouling occurred after 500 hours.   The cleaning
solution (two percent citric acid at pH 4) was selected to remove iron
hydroxide precipitate, which could have resulted from corrosion of stainless
steel components in the test system.  However, if this were the foul ant,
performance should have declined gradually from the beginning of the life
test.  A more satisfactory explanation is that some constituent in  the feed
builds up to its solubility limit over the first 500 hours of operation and,
thereafter, continues to foul the membrane by precipitation.   This  hypothesis
is supported by the presence of a precipitate in the feed tank  that was quite
evident after 720 hours and may have started to accumulate at about 500
hours.  The feed solution was analyzed for carbonates,  with the thought that
the dissolution of C02 could increase the carbonate level and cause preci-
pitation of Na2CO^.  The analysis showed that Na2C03 was considerably
below its solubility limit; however, precipitation of some less soluble
carbonate species cannot be ruled out.

     If the hypothesis is correct that the total-recycle mode of operation
resulted in an accumulation of sparingly soluble salt,  the data beyond 500
hours operating time would not be characteristic of membrane performance
under actual operating conditions.  Even if the bath were saturated with  this
salt, the drag-out would be diluted in the rinse and concentrated in  the  RO
system to only about ten percent of bath strength, that is, ten percent of
saturation.  Hence, the sparingly soluble salt would not accumulate in the
reverse osmosis system as it does during total recycle.

     Based on the first 500 hours of operation, the decline in  both flux  and
rejection for the B-9 is too rapid to make this membrane economically attrac-
tive for zinc cyanide recovery.  This conclusion is supported by the results
of static tests conducted by du Pont.  In these tests the polyamide hollow
fiber was soaked in a zinc cyanide solution at ten percent of bath  strength.

                                      11

-------
Significant deterioration of the physical strength of the fibers was observed
during several weeks of testing.


     Over the first 500 hours of operation, the flux and rejection for the
NS-100 were good.  It was concluded that the NS-100 membrane has potential
for the treatment of zinc cyanide rinsewaters and should be field tested on
actual rinsewaters from a zinc cyanide plating operation.
                                       12

-------
                                 SECTION V

                     FIELD TEST OF THE NS-100 MEMBRANE


ATTEMPTS TO FABRICATE AN NS-100 SPIRAL-WOUOND MODULE

     Following the laboratory life tests with the B-9 mini-permeator and the
NS-100 tubular membrane it was decided that the most meaningful field test
would be one conducted with the NS-100 membrane in the spiral-wound configur-
ation.  The spiral-wound configuration is preferred for treating plating
rinsewaters since the capital and operating costs are lower, and the advan-
tages of the tubular configurations (namely, resistance to fouling by
suspended solids and operation at higher pressures) are not required in this
application.  The construction details of a spiral-wound module are shown in
Figure 4.

     The conditions and procedures used for formation of the NS-100 were
similar to those used for preparation of NS-100 tubular membranes (6).
Following the laboratory life test, four attempts were made to fabricate a
workable NS-100 spiral-wound module.  The first three attempts failed because
of leaks in the module glue seams.  Better results were obtained with the
fourth module.  This module, which contained a membrane surface area of about
2.3 m^, was tested on a total-recycle system similar to that shown in
Figure 1.  The module was operated on a 1,500 ppm NaCl feed solution at 2.8 x
10° N/m^, 25°C, and approximately zero percent conversion.  No gross
leaks were observed, but a considerable break-in period was required in order
to achieve the final steady state flux and rejection.  After 24 hours of
operation, the flux was approximately 0.53 m3/m2/day (13 gfd) and the
rejection was 75 percent.  While these results are encouraging, the perform-
ance of this module is inadequate for a meaningful field test.  The NS-100
membrane is capable of achieving rejections in excess of 98 percent under the
conditions at which the module was tested.

     Since attempts to fabricate a NS-100 spiral-wound module were unsuccess-
ful, it was decided to proceed with field testing the NS-100 membrane in the
tubular configuration.  It was reasoned that these tests would illustrate the
performance of the membrane over an extended period of exposure to rinsewater
under actual field conditions.  If these tests were successful, further
development of a spiral-wound module would be warranted.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

     A flow schematic of the reverse osmosis system used to field test  the
tubular NS-100 membrane is shown in Figure 5.  Feed was pumped from the rinse
tank by a booster pump (Worthington Model D-520) and filtered through a
30-micron and a 1-micron cartridge filter arranged in series.  The pressure
                                     13

-------
FEED SOLUTION
FEED SOLUTION
                                  MODULE SEAL (SEALS AGAINST THE INSIDE WALL OF A PRESSURE
                                 , VESSEL TO FORCE THE FEED SOLUTION THROUGH THE MODULE)

                                                                  PERMEATE COLLECTION HOLES
CONCENTRATE

  PERMEATE OUT

CONCENTRATE
               FEED FLOW
               ACROSS FEf D
               CHANNEL SPACER
                   PERMEATE FLOW (AFTER PASSAGE
                   THROUGH MEMBRANE INTO PERMEATE
                   COLLECTION MATERIAL)
                                       COVERING
             FEED CHANNEL
             SPACER
             MEMBRANE

             PERMEATE COLLECTION
             MATERIAL

             MEMBRANE

             FEED CHANNEL
             SPACER
                                                                                              'ADHESION LINE
                            Figure  4.   Abcor  spiral-wound  membrane module.

-------
            Plated Parts
Plated Parts 8 Drag out
         Drag out

 Rlnsewater  •——
                                                                                                     Parts
                                                                                                                To
                                                                                                               Plant
                                                                                                               Waste
                                                                                                             Disposal
                                                                                                              System
Booster
  Pump
                                                   High Pressure
                                                       Pump
                                               >  To Plant Haste
                                                  Disposal System
Key:

T     Temperature Gauge
P     Pressure Gauge
ACC   Accumulator
LPS   Low  Pressure Switch
NV    Needle Valve
PRV   Pressure Relief Valve
SV    Sample Valve
BPR   Back Pressure Regulator
F     Flow Meter
FCV   Flow Control Valve
                           Figure  5.   Flow schematic  for field  test system.

-------
of the filtered feed was then increased to the desired operating pressure of
4.2 x 106 N/m2, (600 psig) by a positive displacement diaphragm pump
(Yarway Cyclophram Model 072).  Pressure pulsations were dampened by an
accumulator located on the pump discharge.  The membrane tubes were connected
in series with a flow rate of 2.5 m3/day (0.45 gpm) in each tube.  The
permeate stream from the tubular NS-100 module flowed directly to the plant
wastewater treatment system.  The concentrate stream passed through a back
pressure regulator, which was used to control the operating pressure.  Most
of the concentrate stream was returned to the suction side of the booster
pump while a small portion (sufficient to yield a 90 percent conversion) was
bled through a control valve to the plant wastewater system.

     Pressures were measured before and after the cartridge filters, to
determine when replacement was necessary, and before and after the reverse
osmosis module to determine the operating pressure and pressure drop along
the tubes.  The system was protected from over-pressurization by a pressure
relief valve.

     Feed and concentrate flow rates were measured using flow meters, while
the permeate flow rate from each individual tube was measured by the "bucket
and stopwatch" technique.  Feed, concentrate, and permeate samples were taken
periodically for analysis.  Samples were analyzed for zinc, total solids, pH,
and conductivity using the following analytical methods:

          Parameter         Method                    Procedure

          Zinc              Atomic absorption           301A*

          Total solids      Evaporation-gravimetric     208A*

          pH                Meter reading               424*

          Conductivity      Meter reading               205*

     The membrane module consisted of seven tubular NS-100 membranes arranged
in series.  Each tube had a diameter of 12.7 mm (0.5 in), a length of 0.61 mm
( 2 ft), and a surface area of 0.024 m2 (0,26 ft2), (tubular module total
area = 0.17 m2).  Two different types of NS-100 membrane were installed in
the module:  four tubes of Type I membrane cast on a 4-mil-thick polysulfone
backing, and three tubes of Type J, cast on 8-mil-thick polysulfone backing.

     Membrane performance was determined by periodically interrupting the
field test and conducting a total recycle test with a standard solution at
standard operating conditions.  The standard solution was contained in an
auxiliary feed tank and, after draining and flushing the system, feed was
withdrawn from the auxiliary tank and both concentrate and permeate were
returned to the tank (see Figure 1).  At steady state, the flux of each tube
*Standard Method for the  Examination of Water  and Wastewater, 14th ed.,
 American Public Health Association, Washington D.C. 1976.

                                       16

-------
was measured  and samples of feed  and permeate were obtained to determine  the
rejection for each tube.  Following the test, the system was drained  and
returned to operation on the  actual zinc cyanide rinsewater.

    Standard performance tests were conducted with two different solutions:
a 1,500 ppm Nad solution,  and a solution of the actual zinc cyanide plating
bath diluted to five percent of bath strength.   During these tests the system
was operated at 4.2 x 106 N/nr (600 psig),  25°C C77°F), and 2.5 m3/day/tube
(0.45 gpm/tube) feed rate.

     Results of previous field tests have shown that performance data obtained
during operation on the actual rinsewater are difficult to interpret since
there is no way to control the concentration of the feed to the RO system.
Since feed concentration affects both flux and rejection, data obtained at
different feed concentrations cannot be directly compared to determine
whether the flux and rejection remain stable with time.  This problem,
varying feed concentration, is obviated by using the standard zinc cyanide
solution and total recycle operation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

     During the tests, the module with seven tubular membranes was exposed to
zinc cyanide rinsewaters for 2,300 hours, with an actual operating time of
1,300 hours.  The shorter operating time reflects uncontrollable system
interruptions at the site, as well as minor mechanical problems that mainly
occurred during the first 1,000 hours of membrane exposure.  Permeate fluxes
and solute rejections for both types of membrane showed little decline in
performance throughout the test.  The Type J membranes (8-mil  backing)
displayed higher rejections than the Type I membranes  (4-mil backing),
presumably because of the improved physical properties.  Accordingly, only
data for the Type J membranes are presented.

     The rejections obtained during standard tests with zinc cyanide rinse-
waters (plating bath diluted to five percent of bath strength) for the three
Type J tubular membrane assemblies are presented in Figures 6  through 8.
Each figure presents the rejection data obtained for one of the three Type J
tubes tested.  The rejections were excellent.  They appeared to increase
during the first 1,500 hours, then remained constant or decreased slightly
during the remainder of the test.  Conductivity rejections were 80-96 per-
cent, total solids rejections 87-96 percent, and zinc rejections 96-99.7
percent.

     Fluxes obtained during the tests at five percent of bath  strength were
also very stable.  They are presented in Figure 9, which indicates flux
levels of 0.20-0.37 m3/m2/day.

     The conductivity rejections obtained with 1,500 ppm NaCl  solutions are
given in Figure 10.  The rejection appeared to decrease with time, but this
is believed to have resulted from an ion exchange or adsorption phenomenon
occurring when the membranes were in contact with the highly alkaline zinc
cyanide rinsewaters.  This hypothesis was substantiated by operating the
system on a 10,000 ppm NaCl  solution for 170 hours and again measuring the

                                    17

-------
00
99.9

99.8

99.6
99.4
99.2
  99

  98

  96
  94
  92
  90

  80

  60
  40
  20
                                                         Key:
                                                         O Conductivity
                                                         D Total SolIds
                                                         A Zinc
                                 200     400    600   800    1000    1200    1400
                                                          Contact Time, Hours
                                                          1600    1800    2000    2200    2400
                                Figure 6.   Rejection for membrane  Jl  at 5% of bath strength.

-------
vo
                     o
                     •r"
                     +J
                        99.
                        99.8
                        99. (

                        99.4
                        99.2
                          99
                          98
96
94
92
90
                          80
                          60

                          40
                          20
                           0
                                Key:
                                O Conductivity
                                D Total SolIds
                                A Zinc
                                  200     400   600    800    1000    1200    1400    1600   1800   2000    2200    2400
                                                             Contact Time, Hours
                                 Figure  7.   Rejection  for membrane J2  at 5% of  bath  strength.

-------
ro
o
                   »«
                    ft
                   g
                   3
                        99.%
                        99. £-
                        99.6

                        99.4
                        99.2
                          99
                          91 -
                          96
                          80
                          60
                          40
                          20
                          0
 Key:
 O Conductivity
 DTotal Solids
 Azinc
                                  200     400    600     800
 1000    1200   1400
Contact Time, Hours
                                                                                 1600   1800    2000    2200    2400
                                    Figure 8.   Rejection  for membrane 03  at 5%  of bath strength.

-------
    1.0
    0.8
    0.6

    0.4

CM
«*£ 0.2
     0.1
    0.08
    0.06
                                     I
                          Key:
                          O  Membrane Jl
                          n  Membrane J2
                          A  Membrane J3

                              I       I
                                                           I
                                                    I
                                                                          I
                                                                                 I
                                                                                         I
200    400     600     800
                                          1000    1200    1400
                                          Contact Time, Hours
1600    1800    2000   2400
                         Figure  9.   Flux  at 5% of  bath  strength.

-------
IN)
INS
                   o
                   5
                       99.9
                       99.8  -
                                                                       Key:

                                                                       O Membrane Jl

                                                                       rj Membrane J2

                                                                       A Membrane J3
                                                                        Closed symbols represent data
                                                                        obtained after the  1% Nad
                                                                        treatment.
200   400
                                              600    800   1000,   1200    1400   1600    1800  ,2000    2200   2400

                                                              Contact Time., Hours
                              Figure 10.   Conductivity  rejections obtained during standard  tests
                                            with sodium chloride.

-------
conductivity rejection with a 1,500 ppm Nacl solution.  It was felt that by
operating the system at a high salt concentration, the adsorption or ion
exchange that had occurred could be reversed.  This was indeed the case, as
the rejection for all three membranes increased after this treatment (closed
symbols, Figure 10).  Perhaps further recovery of NaCl rejection might be
achieved by operating the system with higher salt concentrations for a longer
period of time.

     Flux levels remained stable during the tests except for an apparent
increase after an elapsed exposure time of 1,600 hours (Figure 11).  This may
indicate membrane degradation, but it is more likely to be connected with
some other phenomenon since no other data indicate degradation of the mem-
brane.

     Data obtained while the system was operating on actual zinc cyanide
rinsewaters indicate high fluxes and rejections, as shown in Table 1.
Membrane fluxes were 0.25-0.41 m^/m^/day; conductivity rejections were
76-94 percent; total solids rejections were 85-87 percent; and zinc rejec-
tions were 95.5-99.3 percent.  It should be noted that although the system
was operated at 90 percent water recovery, concentrations in the membrane
loop were only 2-4 times those in the feed because of the low rejections of
the Type I membranes.

     Results of the 2,300-hour field test with the tubular NS-100 module
indicated adequate flux and rejection and no degradation for the Type J
membranes.  It is, therefore, concluded that the NS-100 membrane can be used
for the treatment of zinc cyanide rinsewaters.
                                      23

-------
E
 «l
X
   1.0
   0.8

   0.6

   0.4
    0.2
    0.1
   0.08

   0.06
                           I
           Key:
           O   Membrane Jl
           Q   Membrane J2
           A   Membrane J3
               I
                                                                            I
                                                                                  I
200
400    600     800
                                       1000   1200   1400
                                       Contact Time, Hours
                                         1600    1800    2000   2200
  *    Figure 11.   Fluxes  obtained during  standard sodium chloride  tests.

-------
TABLE 1.   MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE DURING OPERATION
             ON ACTUAL ZINC CYANIDE RINSEWATER

Time (hrs)
Rinse concentration
Conductivity (ymho/cm)
Total solids (mg/1 )
Zinc (mg/1)
Membrane loop concentration
Conductivity (umho/cm)
Total solids (mg/1)
Zinc (mg/1)
Membrane Jl
Conductivity rejection (%)
Total solids rejection (%)
Zinc rejection (%)
Flux (m3/m2/day)
Membrane J2
Conductivity rejection (%)
Total solids rejection (%)
Zinc rejection (%)
Flux (m3/m2/day)
Membrane J3
Conductivity rejection (%)
Total solids rejection (%)
Zinc rejection (%)
Flux (m3/m2/day)
1,850

9,800
6,843
375

17,000
14,606
980

94.1
96.2
99.3
0.32

75.9
85.3
96.1
0.24

86.5
92.0
98.7
0.26
2,100

8,000
4,560
204

21,000
18,350
665

94.3
97.1
99.2
0.39

77.1
86.5
95.5
0.28

88.1
94.1
98.5
0.38
                          25

-------
                                 SECTION 6

                 FABRICATION OF NS-100 SPIRAL-WOUND MODULES
     Following the successful field tests with the NS-100 membrane in tubular
configuration, further efforts were directed toward fabricating an NS-100
spiral-wound module.

     The preparation of NS-100 spiral-wound membrane modules based on forma-
tion procedures developed for tubular configurations required adaptations in
two main areas:

     1.  the casting of a continuous flat sheet polysulfone substrate on a
         cloth backing (rather than the casting of discrete tubular sections)

     2.  the formation of the NS-100 ultrathin membrane on the flat sheet
         polysulfone substrate.

     A flat sheet of polysulfone, 0.91 m wide by 92 m long, was cast, and two
basic approaches to the formation of the NS-100 spiral-wound module were
attempted.  In the first approach, a polysulfone module was wound and then
the NS-100 skin was formed in situ.  In the second approach, the NS-100
ultrathin membrane was formed on the polysulfone substrate and then the
membrane was wound into a spiral module.  One module using the first approach
and four modules using the second approach were fabricated.  The best per-
formance characteristics obtained during a standard 1,500 mg/1 NaCl test were
a flux of 0.33 m3/m2/day and a rejection of 60 percent.  Following these
attempts it was concluded that the additional development required to fabri-
cate a workable NS-100 spiral-wound module was beyond the resources available
to this program.

     Although commercialization of a spiral-wound NS-100 module does not
appear imminent, the Fluid Systems Division of Univeral Oil Products, Inc.
(San Diego, CA) has recently developed a similar membrane, designated PA-300,
in a spiral-wound configuration.  This membrane module should be commercially
available in the near future and may well supercede the NS-100 as the most
promising new membrane for treatment of zinc cyanide and other electroplating
rinsewaters.  Tests being conducted at the Walden Division of Abcor, Inc.,
under a separate EPA grant, indicate excellent performance characteristics
for PA-300 flat-sheet membranes during exposure to zinc cyanide rinsewaters.
Based on these tests and the results presented in Sections 4 and 5 for the
NS-100 membrane (given its similarity to the PA-300), field testing of a
spiral-wound PA-300 membrane on zijic cyanide rinsewater is recommended.  Such
a field test is being conducted under a separate EPA grant; results will be
published in a separate report.

                                     26

-------
                                 REFERENCES
1.  Donnelly, R.6., R.L. Goldsmith, K.J. McNulty, D.C. Grant, and M. Tan.
    1976.  Treatment of electroplating wastes by reverse osmosis.  EPA-600/2-
    76-261, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.  96 pp.

2.  Golomb, A. 1973.  Application of reverse osmosis to electroplating waste
    treatment, Part III.  Plating 60(5):482-486. 1977.

3.  McNulty, K.J., R.L. Goldsmith, and A.Z. Gollan. 1977.   Reverse osmosis
    field test:  treatment of Watts nickel rinse waters.  EPA-600/2-77-039,
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. 29 pp.

4.  McNulty, K.J., R.L Goldsmith, A.Z. Gollan, S. Hossian, and D. C. Grant.
    1977.  Reverse osmosis field test: treatment of copper cyanide rinse
    waters.  EPA-600-2-77-170, U.S. Environmental Protection AGency, Cincin-
    nati, Ohio. 89 pp.

5.  Rozelle, L.T., J.E. Cadotte, C.V. Kopp, and K.E. Cobian. 1973.  NS-1
    membranes:  potentially effective new membranes for treatment of washwater
    in space cabins.  ASME Paper 73-ENAS-19. ASME, New York, N.Y. 5 pp.

6.  Zakak, A., P. Hoover,  A.Z. Gollan, and R.L. Goldsmith. 1975.   Development
    of a low-cost tubular  reverse osmosis module for one-pass sea water
    desalting.  U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Saline Water, OSW
    Contract No. 14-30-3251.
                                     27

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
  RLPORT NO.
  EPA-600/2-80-059
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

 LABORATORY  AND FIELD EVALUATION OF
 NS-100 REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE
             5. REPORT DATE
              April  1980 issuing date
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
           K
-------