Ecological Research Series
                         BROWNS FERRY
        BIOTHERMAL  RESEARCH SERIES
        I. Colonization  by Periphyton,
Zooplankton, and  Macroinvertebrates
                       Environmental Research Laboratory
                       Office of Research and Development
                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                            Duluth, Minnesota 55804

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination  of  traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.   Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.   Environmental Protection Technology
      3.   Ecological Research
      4.   Environmental Monitoring
      5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.   Scientific  and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.   Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.   "Special"  Reports
      9.   Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans, plant and animal spe-
cies, and  materials.  Problems are assessed for t,hejr long- and short-term influ-
ences. Investigations include formation, transport, and pathway studies to deter-
mine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides the technical basis
for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the
aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                                     EPA-600/3-78-020
                                                     February 1978
                 BROWNS FERRY BIOTHERMAL RESEARCH SERIES
                     I.  COLONIZATION BY PERIPHYTON,
                   ZOOPLANKTON,  AND MACROINVERTEBRATES
                                   by

                 Brian J.  Armitage, Thomas D.  Forsythe,
               Elizabeth B.  Rodgers, and William B.  Wrenn

                       Biothermal Research Section
                  Division of Forestry,  Fisheries, and
                          Wildlife Development
                       Tennessee Valley  Authority
                        Decatur, Alabama   35602
                                TV-35013A
                            Project Officers

         Thomas H. Ripley                     Kenneth E.  Biesinger
       Division of Forestry,            Environmental Research Laboratory
Fisheries, and Wildlife Development          6201 Congdon Boulevard
         Forestry Building                  Duluth, Minnesota  55804
     Norris, Tennessee  37828
                        This study was conducted
                           in cooperation with
                       Tennessee Valley Authority
                        Norris, Tennessee  37828
               ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - DULUTH
                   OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                  U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        DULUTH, MINNESOTA  55804

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Research Laboratory-
Duluth, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views
and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention
of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommen-
dation for use.
                                      ii

-------
                                  FOREWORD
     The aquatic environment must be protected from the adverse effects of
thermal dishcarges.   Large volume thermal discharges,  if not properly managed,
can have deleterious effects on fish populations and their food chain organisms
and thus ultimately  diminish the quality of man's environment;  conversely,
excessive control measures can result in economic penalties to  the public.  A
balance must therefore be attained between the industrial utilization of water
and the maintenance  of a high-quality environment.  The Browns  Ferry Biothermal
Research Station contributes to the search for this acceptable  balance through
investigations on

     —the effects of increased temperature on growth,  survival,
       reproduction  of sport and commercially important fish species
       and their food organisms, and

     —the effects of increased temperature on the ecological
       relationships between fish and their food organisms.

     This report focuses on the ecology of organisms in the experimental
system which will constitute the food chain for the fish species to be
investigated.  Specifically, this report addresses the colonization of the
experimental system, under natural thermal conditions,  by the food chain
organisms and thus serves as the baseline for future studies that will be
conducted under conditions of elevated temperatures.
                                      Clyde W.  Voigtlander
                                      Senior Aquatic Ecologist
                                      Division  of Forestry, Fisheries,
                                        and Wildlife Development
                                      Tennessee Valley Authority
                                      Norris, Tennessee  37828
                                      iii

-------
                                  ABSTRACT
     Colonization studies on a series of 12 outdoor experimental channels
supplied with water from Wheeler Reservoir (Tennessee River)  were completed
at the Browns Ferry Biothermal Research Station in Alabama.   Species
composition, dominance, seasonal patterns, colonization rates,  and biomass
estimates were determined over a 24-month period for periphyton, zooplankton,
and macroinvertebrates.  The periphyton assemblages were highly productive
and diverse.  Colonization of bare surfaces was extremely rapid during summer
months.  Zooplankton was abundant and was composed primarily of shallow-water
forms.  Macroinvertebrates quickly colonized the biothermal  channels by way
of inflowing reservoir water and by air.  Macroinvertebrate  diversity was as
great as or greater than that in Wheeler Reservoir and represented taxa found
in both littoral and open-water areas.  In general, the species composition
and the relative densities of algal and invertebrate organisms  that colonized
the channels indicated that the channels successfully simulate  reservoir
ecosystems for those trophic levels.

     The work upon which this publication is based was performed pursuant to
an Interagency Agreement between the Tennessee Valley Authority and the
Environmental Protection Agency.  This report was submitted  in  partial
fulfillment of Contract No. TV-35013A by the Tennessee Valley Authority under
partial sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  This report
covers field work from March 1974 to February 1976, and analyses completed as
of March 1977.
                                      iv

-------
                                  CONTENTS
Foreword	iii
Abstract	iv
Figures	vi
Tables	vii

     1.  Introduction  	   1
     2.  Research Facility 	   2
     3.  Conclusions 	   5
     4.  Periphyton	   7
              Scope	   7
              Materials and Methods  	   7
              Results and Discussion 	   8
     5.  Zooplankton	19
              Scope	19
              Materials and Methods  	  19
              Results	21
              Discussion	22
     6.  Macroinvertebrates  	  30
              Scope	30
              Materials and Methods  	  30
              Results	31
              Discussion	32

References	45

-------
                                   FIGURES


Number                                                                    Page

   1.  Planview of experimental channels and auxiliary facilities 	   3

   2.  Profile of Browns Ferry biothermal experimental channel  	   4

   3.  Number of periplvyton species identified from the biothermal
         channels (plotted by quarterly accumulations)  	  16

   4.  Mean values for active chlorophyll &_ during the colonization
         period (15 cm depth)	17

   5.  Vertical profiles of active chlorophyll a. after 1 and 3 weeks
         colonization 	  18

   6.  Diel^, periodicity of Simooephalus vetulus (large cladoceran)
         in a channel during the winter	* .  24

   7.  Total microcrustacean plankton density (numbers/m3) and dry weight
         biomass (mg/m3) in a channel for the 1974 and 1975 sampling
         periods	26

   8.  Water temperature and density of the seven dominant taxa in
         one channel for the 1974 and 1975 sampling periods	27

   9.  Species composition in terms of percent numbers and percent
         biomass for 1974 and 1975 sampling periods	28
                                      vi

-------
                                   TABLES
Number                                                                    Page

   1.   Algal taxa found in the biothermal  channels	10

   2.   Increases in the number of algal species colonized after 3,  7,
         and 10 days	^   15

   3.   Number of algal species colonizing  bare substrates at  15,  46,
         and 76 cm depth	15

   4.   Microcrustacean plankton found in channels as of 1975	25

   5.   Average percent relative abundance  in terms  of numbers and
         biomass in one channel and in terms of numbers in Wheeler
         Reservoir	29

   6.   Macroinvertebrate taxa identified in biothermal channels during
         colonization period 	   34

   7.   Macroinvertebrate taxa observed in  three sample areas  on
         succeeding dates  	   39

   8.   Population trends of taxa sampled in channels between  summer,
         1974 and spring, 1976	42

   9.   Numbers and dry weights of organisms per m2  on wall areas on
         successive sampling dates in 1976 	   44
                                      vii

-------
                                  SECTION 1

                                INTRODUCTION
     As early as 1968, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA),  in collaboration
with the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration,  now the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), recognized the need to acquire scientific information
that could be used for reliable prediction of the effects of increased
temperature on aquatic organisms.  A plan was initiated to build a research
facility in which aquatic organisms could be held under essentially natural
conditions but maintained under the closer controls that  approached laboratory
conditions.  Construction of this facility, which began in 1972, is essentially
complete.

     The primary feature of the facility is a series of 12 temperature-
controlled outdoor channels.  The project objectives are  to:   (1) Determine
the effect of increased annual temperature on the growth, survival, and
reproduction of warm-water fishes with emphasis on sport  and commercially-
valuable reservoir species;  (2) determine the effect of  increased annual
temperature on the species composition and production of  algae, macroinverte-
brates, and zooplankton; and  (3) determine the effect of increased annual
temperature on ecological relations between fish and their food organisms.
Attainment of the above objectives will provide data for  establishing or
adjusting temperature criteria for warm-water streams and reservoirs, and for
establishing thermal regimes for optimal production of specified groups of
aquatic organisms.

     Prior to the initiation of the heated water experiments, the channels were
colonized by Tennessee River organisms over a three-year  period (1974-1976)
under ambient temperature conditions.  This report documents the establishment
of the primary and intermediate trophic levels in the channels during the first
24 months.

-------
                                 SECTION 2

                             RESEARCH FACILITY
     The research station is located adjacent to TVA's Browns Ferry Nuclear
Plant on the north bank of the Tennessee River (Wheeler Reservoir),
approximately 10 miles (16 km) southwest of Athens,  Alabama.   Water
temperature and flow are controlled in 12 concrete channels (114 m long,
4.3 m wide, and 2 m deep) (Figure 1).  The substrates (natural reservoir
sediments and limestone rock) are arranged to provide six alternating
pools and six rock areas in each channel (Figure 2).  Other major components
include:  six tubular heat exchangers located near the inlets of the channels;
high-temperature and low-temperature pumping stations; five secondary fish-
holding ponds; a laboratory-office building; and a water-quality monitoring
system that includes a minicomputer (32-K memory).

     For this 24-month colonization study, water was pumped to the channels
from Wheeler Reservoir at the same rate as that at which it will be pumped
for the heated water experiments.  Water discharge is about 0.66 m3/min
(180 gal/min) with a channel retention time of approximately  14 hours.

-------
CO
             L_
                      SECURITY FENCH
                                           ACCESS ROAD
                                                                                  FISH


• 	 • imn
CHANNELS |




c






























HOLDING
PONDS

g
^ VALVE
BOX
/
(

D c=
1=

C
D c




D

XJTLET \ INLET
BARRIER
SCREENS
REMOVEABLE
« * llfXMIIIKXXHIUj!,! 1 — ~
                                                                                             t—
                                                                                                    STRAINERS
                                                                                         HIGH TEMPERATURE   I
                                                                                         PUMPING STATION    I
                                                                                         NEAR CONDENSER   O
                                                                                         DISCHARGE OUTLET   O
     ,J
LOW TEMPERATURE
PUMPING STATION
ON WHEELER RESERVIOR
                       Figure 1.   Planview of  experimental channels and auxiliary  facilities.

-------
             BARRIER SCREEN
               (Zrnrn ICSH)
                                                                                                 WATER LEVEL
                                                    h*~1
                  '  '  'yy S / ' S / S / S • ' r s f / s s / S *',,./ X x * *
                / ' ' / / // / // ' / / / / ////// / / / / ' / ' UUD-SILT  / ' / / '
               /'////////,///////////  / / / / / / / "U,U xSIJfT / / / / /
               / / / S / / S S / / / / J / / / / / / / S / S S / /^//S /_ s s / / / / / '
OUTLET
                    Figure 2.   Profile of Browns Ferry biothermal  channel.

-------
                                  SECTION 3

                                 CONCLUSIONS
     On the basis of 24 months of colonization studies and observations,  we
have derived the following conclusions concerning the non-chordate biota  of
the biothennal channels:

     1.  Initial filling of the channels was accompanied by high algal
productivity and biomass.

     2.  Chlorophyll ji concentrations of periphyton on wall and rock areas
were highest during the late summer and early fall.

     3.  The biomass (as chlorophyll a) and species richness of the
periphyton were within ranges reported in the literature.

     4.  Colonization rates were greater during the summer in terms of both
species numbers and biomass.

     5.  Zooplankton community composition became more complex as
colonization proceeded; seven groups (S-imocephalus, daphnids, Bosmina3
Ceriodaphniaj cyclopids, Chydovus,  and ostracods) were dominant.

     6.  The channels are selective for shallow-water zooplankton species.
No established populations of open-water forms were found.

     7.  The channel design allows convenient sampling of zooplankton,
although the diel periodicity patterns of most species necessitate night
sampling.

     8.  The biothermal channels provide excellent habitat for colonization
or macroinvertebrate species native to the Tennessee River.

     9.  Pool areas in the channels are suitable for invasion by Hexagenia
bilineataj bivalve molluscs including Corbioula manilens{.s3 Anodonta imbeciles,
and Etipt-Lo srassidens; relatively large operculate gastropods such as Pleuroaera
oanal-iculatwn-, the leech, Erpobdella punctata; and certain midges of the
subfamily Chironominae.  All of these organisms are found also in open-water
benthic areas of Wheeler Reservoir.

    10.  Rock and wall areas offer suitable habitat for the amphipods Hyalella
azteoa and Crangonyx sp., relatively small pulmonate and operculate Gastropoda,
heptageniid and baetid Ephemeroptera, psychomyiid and hydroptilid Trichoptera.
and a wide variety of Odonata and Chironomidae.

-------
     11.  Organisms dominant in terms of numbers were the Oligochaeta,
Pelecypoda, Amphipoda, Gastropoda, and Chironomidae.

     12.  Channels drawn down for two months in late fall successfully
recolonized.  Gastropoda, Amphipoda, and Chironomidae showed definite
increased densities after drawdown.

-------
                                  SECTION 4

                                 PERIPHYTON
SCOPE

     The biothermal channels are similar to the littoral areas of many
reservoirs, because of water depth and substrate types.   The absence in the
channels of aquatic vascular plants and of extreme wave  activity are the
apparent principal differences.   In water bodies with well-developed littoral
zones, the attached algae usually contribute a major share of the annual
productivity of the system (Hutchinson, 1975;  Wetzel, 1975).  Species diversity
is also usually high,  with species lists commonly showing 100-300 species
present in the littoral zones (Hutchinson, 1975).  Beginning in June, 1974,
an evaluation was undertaken of  the periphyton naturally colonizing the bio-
thernal channels.  The purposes  of the initial colonization studies were:
(1) to determine species composition and dominance patterns; (2) to identify
seasonal shifts and cycling in the periphyton community; (3) to estimate species
invasion rates and ascertain the sequence in which species became established;
and (4) to estimate the biomass  of periphyton produced with time.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

     Samples for species identification were taken from  scrapings of walls
and rock areas, from floating mats, from cores of pool sediments, and from
artificial substrates  (cellulose acetate strips, plexiglas plates, glass
slides, styrofoam sheets).  Identifications were made to the species level
whenever possible.

     Colonization of artificial  substrates was compared  with that of natural
substrates in the channels.  Although periphyton assemblages on all
artificial substrates  tested approximated those on natural substrates,
cellulose acetate was  slightly superior.  This material  had the additional
advantage of being easy to cut in various dimensions. Therefore, the major
portion of the results was obtained employing this material.  Strips (5 cm x
50 cm) were suspended horizontally at a depth of 15 cm and allowed to be
colonized for two, three, and four weeks.  Smaller strips (2.5 x 5 cm) were
implanted in rubber stoppers and suspended at depths of  15, 46, and 76 cm.
Long strips (2.5 x 105 cm) were  also hung vertically in  the water column for
pigment-depth profiles.

     Species invasion sequences  were interpreted on a presence/absence basis.
Three-dimensional colonies, branched filaments, mucilaginous colonies, tapering
filaments, and dividing mother cells complicated attempts at quantification

-------
either by cell  counts  or  cell volumes.  Recent  experiments using  tetrazolium
violet have  indicated  that  a significant number of algae colonizing artificial
substrates  (which would normally be counted  using conventional microscopic
techniques)  were not metabolically active.   Tetrazolium violet is a tetrazolium
salt which forms a violet precipitate in actively metabolizing cells via the
electron transport system (Dozier,  OREL, unpublished).  The 2.5 x 5.0 cm strips
for species  invasion sequences were normally collected after 3, 7, and 10 days.
Species invasion sequences  and colonization  rates were examined periodically.

     Chlorophyll was analyzed following methods of EPA (1973) and Vollenweider
(1974).  Correction was applied  for phaeophytin.  Active chlorophyll a_ is
reported as  yg  chl a*/cm2.


RESULTS AND  DISCUSSION

     During  1974-75, 124  taxa of algae were  identified (Table 1).  Of these,
100 taxa were identified  to the  species level (greens [36], charophytes [1],
euglenoids  [2], diatoms  [55], blue-greens  [6]).  Most of these taxa were
epilithic or epiphytic; the epipelic taxa  received only a cursory examination.
Although the absence of aquatic  vascular plants in the channels has possibly
eliminated an important habitat  normally present in the littoral  zones of
lakes and reservoirs,  the diversity of algae colonizing the biothermal channels
is comparable with that of  many  reservoirs.

     During  spring 1974,  following the initial  filling of the channels with
water pumped from Wheeler Reservoir, massive blooms of Hydrodictyon reticulation
developed in the channels.  Floating mats  of this species eventually
concentrated at the lower ends of the channels.  Following this bloom, smaller
random blooms of Spirogyra  grati-ana^ Sp. nitida^ and Cladophora glomerata
occurred along  the walls  or on the  rock areas.  Very few diatom species were
in evidence.  The periphyton community during winter 1974-75, was dominated by
Oedogonium kurzii,, StigeoolonLum sp., and  a  few epilithic and epiphytic diatoms
(Melosira varians, Coocone-is disoulus, Synedra  aous) were subdominants.  These
eventually gave way to other filamentous and coccoid green algae  of insignificant
biomass during early spring.  A  brief bloom  of  Hydrodietyon retiaulatwn occurred
in several channels during  May 1975; however, its intensity and duration were
well diminished, compared with the  1974 bloom.  Concurrent with the restricted
bloom of Hydrodictyon, Spirogyra gratiana  and Sp. nit-ida began to form mats
attached to  the walls and rock areas.  These species attained their greatest
biomass in late August and  September 1975.   Because of silt accumulation on
the Spirogyra filaments (probably attracted  to  an extracellular poly-
saccharide excreted by these species), the mats became denser and more closely
appressed to the substrates.  Subsequently,  diatoms colonized the silt surface,
followed by blue-greens.  Occasionally during the summer, random patches of
Cladophora 'glomerata appeared, and  Chaetophora elegans was codominant with
Spirogyra on substrates exposed  during September.  The demise of Spirogyra
paralleled dropping temperatures  during October and November.  Scrapings from
artificial and natural substrates during October-December 1975 were dominated
by Melosira varians and Oedogon-ium  kwczi-i.

-------
     From March 1974 to December 1975,  the number of species identified
•increased in a predictable fashion (Figure 3).   The number of diatom species
was not appreciable, however, until winter 1975.  Desmids also were quite
scarce until late summer 1975.  Constant introduction of species from the
reservoir should add to the channels'  flora in forthcoming seasons.  The
absence of vascular aquatic plants and the annual drawdown of the channels
prior to a new experiment, however, could limit the expected increase of
species numbers.

     The sequence of colonization in summer and winter 1975 varied not only
in the species present but also in the number  of species and in the rates of
colonization (Table 2).  During the summer an  artificial substrate was coated
first by bacteria.  This was followed by colonization by a few species of
diatoms (Aohnanthes linearis, Gomphonema parvulwn,  Nitzschia palea)_ and
coccoid greens.  Prostrate colonies of Protoderma viride and Stigeoclonium sp.
then covered large areas, concomitant with the appearance of filaments of
Spipogyra spp.  Chaetophora elegans often served as the codominant with
Spirogyra spp. during the late summer.   The winter colonization was also
initiated by bacteria but was followed by 15-20 different species of diatoms,
particularly Cyrribella tumida, Cym. tw?gida3  Gomphonema angustatum,  Melosira
varians, Nitzsohia acieulariSj and Synedra aous.  Melosira varians clearly
dominated the periphyton assemblage after 5-7  days of exposure.   After about
two weeks of exposure, Oedogoniwn kurzii began to colonize the substrates,
eventually^dominating or codominating with M.  varians.   Examination of natural
substrates revealed an assemblage of periphyton virtually identical with that
on artificial substrates.  Oedogoniwn kurzii supported an epiphytic diatom
flora, in contrast with the summer species of  Spirogyra whose mucilaginous
excretions barred such exploitations.

     Chlorophyll ja, corrected for phaeophytin  (chl a*}, was the major biomass
estimator during the 1974-75 colonization period.  Variation among channels
was often high, possibly due to differences in flow rates for each channel.
Most chlorophyll samples were taken from artificial substrates that were
allowed to be colonized for two weeks (Figure  4).  No statistically significant
variation (P > 0.05) was noted among replicates (3-9) within any one channel.
Typical vertical profiles for chl a* and species numbers for the summer months
are shown in Figure 5 and Table 3, respectively.  Winter profiles were.more
uniform and fewer species were present.

     In general, the productivity of new water bodies is initially high, due
to the influence of organic matter and nutrients originating from flooded
substrates (Zhadin and Gerd, 1961; Rodhe, 1964; Leentvaar, 1966; Biswar, 1969;
Funk and Gaufin, 1971).  The biothermal channels were no exception to this
"hay-infusion" phenomenon, as evidenced by the extensive mats of Hydvodiotyon
vetioulatum and Spivogyra spp.  Chlorophyll a_  concentrations of epilithic
periphyton attached on walls and rock areas fell within the expected range
(100-1200 mg chl a^ / m2) suggested by Hutchinson (1975).  The species richness
also was normal for a littoral habitat.  Although some variations existed among
channels in terms of biomass, the species and  dominance patterns for the channels
were relatively consistent.  This consistency  should provide a good foundation
for judging the effects of various thermal regimes upon the periphyton
communities.

-------
           TABLE 1.  ALGAL TA£A FOUND IN THE EXOTHERMAL CHANNELS
     Class
Order
Species
Chlorophyceae
                   Volvocales
                   Tetrasporales
                   Chlorococcales
                   Ulotrichales
                    Chaetophorales
                    Oedogoniales
                                  *3
                 Chlamydomonas sp.
                 Pandorina movwn Bory

                 Gloeocystis gigas  (Kuetz.) Lagerheim
                 Palmodiotyon vivide Kuetzing

                 Ankistrodesmus faloatus  (Corda) Ralfs
                 Chayaoiwn arribiguum Herman
                 Chlovoooocwn hurrrieola  (Nag.)  Rabenh.
                 Chodatella quadriseta  (Lemm.)  G.M.  Smith
                 Hydrodictyon reticulation (L.)  Lagerheim
                 Pediastrum duplex
                   var. gYac-ilirmm  West & West
                 Pediastrum simplex (Meyen) Lemmermann
                 Soenedesmus quadrioauda  (Trup.) de  Berb.

                 Microspora stagnorum  (Kuetz.)  Lagerheim
                 Stichoeoccus subtilis  (Kuetz.) Klercher
                 Ulothrix sonata  (Weber & Mohr) Kuetzing

                 Chaetophora elegans  (Roth) C.A. Agardh
                 Microthaimion sp.
                 Protoderma viride  Kuetzing
                 Stigeoclonium sp.
                                     Oedogonium kurzii Zeller
3 Exact species  unknown due to the absence of certain essential
  diagnostic  characteristics.
                                      10

-------
   Class
Chlorophyceae
Order
                   Siphonocladales
                   Zygnematales
Species
Charophyceae
                   Charales
Euglenophyceae
                   Euglenales
                 Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kuetzing

                 Mougeotia sp.
                 Spi-rogyra gratiana Transeau
                 Spirogyra nitida (Dillw.) Link
                 Spirogyra. sp.

                 Closterium lunula Nitzsch.
                 Closterium monilifenm Ehrenb.
                 Cosmajfiim bo try tie
                   var. tumidum Wolle
                 Cosmariim exiguum Arch.
                 Cosmarium margaritatwn (Lund.) Roy & Bliss
                 Cosmariwn oohthodes.
                   var. cmoebwn West & West
                 Staurastmm botpophilum Wolle
                 Statafastrum orbiculare Ralfs
                 Staurastvum paradoxim W. West
                 StaurastPim twegesoens de Not
                                    Chora schueinitzii A. Braun
                                    Euglena sp.
                                    Phaous orbicularis Huebner
                                      11

-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
   Class
Order
Species
Bacillariophyceae
                    Eupodiscales
                    Fragilariales
                    Achnanthales
                 Cyclotella stelligera Cleve  & Grun
                 Melosira distorts
                   var. humilis A.  Cleve
                 Melosira granulata (Ehrenb.) Ralfs
                 Melosira granulata
                   var. angust-issima 0.  Mull.
                 Melosira varians  C. A.  Agardh
                 Stephanodiscus astrea
                   var. minutula  (Kuetz.)  Grun.

                 Astevionella formosa Hassal
                 Diatoma hiemale  (Roth.) Heib.
                 Fragilctria oonstruens (Ehrenb.) Grun.
                 Frag-ilaria crotonensis Kitton
                 Opephora martyi Herib.
                 Synedra aoti-nastifop'ides Lemmermann
                 Synedra aous Kuetzing
                 Synedra rumpens  Kuetzing
                 Syndra ulna  (Nitzsch.) Ehrenberg
                 Synedra ulna
                   var.  longissima  (W. Smith) Brun.
                 Tabellaria fenestrata (Lyngb.) Kuetzing
                 Tabellaria flocoulosa (Roth.) Kuetzing

                 Achnanthes exigua Grun.
                 Aehnanthes lonoeolata
                   var. dubia Grun.
                 Achnanthes Hnearis  (W. Smith) Grun,
                                      12

-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
   Class
Order
Species
Bacillariophyceae
                   Achnanthales
                   Naviculales
                 Cocconeis disoulus  (Schum.) Cl.
                 Cocconeis placentula Ehrenberg
                 Rhoicosphenia curvata  (Kuetzing)
                   Grun. ex Rabh,

                 Frustulia rhomboides (Ehrenb.) Det.
                 Gyrosigma spencerii (Quek.) Griff.
                   & Henfr.
                 Navicula crucicula  (W. Smith) Donk.
                 Navicula mutica Kuetzing
                 Navioula radiosa Kuetzing
                 Naviaula sp.
                 Pinnularia biceps Greg.
                 Pinnularia viridis  (Nitz.) Ehrenberg
                 Stauroneis anoeps Ehrenberg

                 Gomphonema angustatwn  (Kuetz.) Rabenh.
                 Gomphonema oli-vaoeum (Lyngb.) Kuetzing
                 Gomphonema parvulum Kuetzing
                 Gomphonema truncation Ehrenberg

                 Amphora sp.
                 Cymbella affinis Kuetzing
                 Cymbella minuta Hilse  ex Rabenh.
                 Cyrnbella prostrata  (Berk.) Cl.
                 Cymbella tunrida (Berb. ex Kuetz.) V. H.
                 Cyrnbella turgida Greg.
                                      13

-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
   Class
Order
Species
Bacillariophyceae
                   Nitzschiales
                    Surirellales
 Cyanophyceae
                    Chroococcales
                    Oscillatoriales
                    Nostocales
                 Nitzschia aoicularis W.  Smith
                 Nitzsohia dissi-pata  (Kuetz.) Grun.
                 Nitzsohia palea  (Kuetz.) W.  Smith
                 Nitzschia sigma  W. Smith
                 Ni-tzsehi-a ticyblionella Hantzsch.
                 N-itzsohia vernrieularis  (Kuetz.)  Grun.
                 Ni-tzsohia sp.

                 Cymatopleura  solea  (Berb.) W.  Smith
                 Swrirella angustata  Kuetzing
                 Surirella patella Ehrenberg
                 Surirella patella
                    var.  neupaueri (Pant.) Cleve-Euler
                 Swrirella sp.
                  Meri-smopedia punctata Meyen

                  Oscillatoria geminata Menegh.
                  Oscillatoria lacustris (Kleb.) Geitler
                  Oso-Lllatoria nigra Vaucher
                  OsoillatoTia princeps Vaucher

                  Pleotonema nostocoman Bornet
                                       14

-------
TABLE 2.  INCREASE IN'THE NUMBER OF ALGAL SP.ECIES COLONIZED AFTER

                        3, 7, AND 10 DAYS

January-


July-


Days
Exposed
3
7
10
3
7
10
~~ a
Species (x)
16
29
38
45
46
52
Species (total) Range
25
47
59
49
58
62
11-19
24-33
34-46
39-47
42-48
46-57
 Mean number of species found on all strips examined (January- 6
 channels; July- 4 channels).

 Total number of species found on all strips.
  TABLE 3.   NUMBER OF ALGAL SPECIES COLONIZING BARE SUBSTRATES

                   AT 15,  46, AND 76 CM DEPTH
August-



Depth
15 cm
46 cm
76 cm
Species (x)
31
33
26
Species (total)0
50
56
42
Range
27-35
28-41
25-29
 Three days colonization period.

 Mean number of species found on all strips examined in four
 channels.

 Total number of species found on all strips at each depth.

                               15

-------
 u
 a.
 u.
 o
140
120
100
80
60
40
20

A
\\ \\ |! ! I'll
A
rt i i ii i:
i i
i :
flBBiillH
     QTR.»    2      3

                1974
2     3

 1975
Figure 3.  Number of periphyton species identified from the

 biothermal channels (plotted by quarterly accumulations).

-------
        23
            JJ   ASONDJ   FMAMJJASOND
Figure 4.  Mean values for active chlorophyll ji during the colonization period  (.15 cm depth).

-------
00
                 week ->  1


                     0.5




                     1.0





                     1.5




                  ~  2.0
                  u
                  a
2.5




3.0




3.5



4.0
                                    5  10
                                                                    80
              Figure 5.  Vertical profiles  of active chlorophyll a. after 1'and  3 weeks  colonization.

-------
                                  SECTION 5

                                 ZOOPLANKTON
SCOPE

     Before the biothermal channels were colonized in 1974, the importance of
zooplankton in such experimental ecosystems was unknown, since many zooplankton
species require open water or cannot tolerate flowing waters (Hutchinson,
1967).  The channels were designed to simulate reservoir flows that should
not severely limit zooplankton occurrence.  Water velocity was adjusted to
about 0.14 m/min in pool sections and 0.56 m/min over shallow rock sections.
Tennessee River water is pumped continuously to the channels at a rate of 0.66
m3/min (180 gal/min) and passes through a 2-mm mesh-opening screening system,
which allows introduction of most reservoir plankton species.

     Because some species of fish to be studied will reproduce in the channels,
a well-developed zooplankton community would be desirable to supply natural
forage £or larval and juvenile stages.  The well-known "critical period" for
larval fish is successfully transcended only when the right quantity 'and
variety of zooplankton food is present at the initiation of feeding.

     The purpose of the zooplankton study was the quantitative assessment of
colonization in a channel by analyzing changes in zooplankton abundance and
species composition from April through October for two years, 1974 and 1975.
Presented here are data for microcrustacean populations only in one channel
where there was no fish predation.  Planktonic rotiferan populations, although
numerous at times, contributed only a small portion to the total zooplankton
biomass and were relatively unimportant as food for fish (except as a first
food for larvae).
MATERIALS AND METHODS

     Zooplankton are known to have patchy distributions in nature, which often
makes representative sampling difficult.  An additional difficulty is that
shallow-water ecosystems often contain many species adapted to benthic habitats.
Furthermore, many littoral species are benthic during the day and migrate into
the plankton of the more open water during the night (Hutchinson, 1967).  To
sample a shallow-water ecosystem representatively, investigators must take
large-volume samples or many small samples (preferably at night) spaced
throughout the study area.

     Many small samples provide the more accurate estimation of patchiness,
but they are often costly to obtain and analyze.  In this study, assessment

                                       19

-------
of patchiness was not an  objective,  so  composite  sampling  and  large-volume
sampling were effectively used  to  factor  out  patchiness.

     Several types of sampling  methods  were considered.  Plankton  traps and
water bottles were judged not appropriate for this  study because of  the
large number of  samples needed  to  obtain  large composite volumes  (>1 m3) and
high numbers of  individuals.  Use  of a  plankton pump was considered.  Large
volumes could be obtained more  rapidly  and many locations  within a channel
could be sampled, but the pump  would require  two  operators.  The method
selected was that of towing a plankton  net horizontally by hand along the
length of each pool and combining  all pool samples.  The advantages  of the
net were that:   (a) it sampled  volumes  of up  to 15  m3, approximately 3%
of the total channel volume;  (b) it  sampled at a  constant  depth when towed
horizontally; (c) it simplified collection of samples by one person; and
(d) it collected large amounts  of  plankton, which made subsampling more
convenient and enumeration more accurate  than would be possible with small
samples.

     Samples were collected with a 0.3  m  diameter,  No. 10  (153 y mesh) plankton
net.  Copepod nauplii and small immature  ostracods  were the only microcrusta-
ceans shown to pass through the No.  10  net.   Its  efficiency was assumed to be
0.85 (after Cummins, 1969).  Estimate of  volume filtered,  4.1  m3,  was judged
to be precise, since the  distance  walked  in towing  could be measured accurately
and replicated.

     A preliminary test was conducted to  assess zooplankton diel periodicity,
sampling reproducibility,  and enumeration error so  that an efficient sampling
routine could be determined.  A nested  experimental design was used  over a
24-hour sampling period in December  1974.  The nesting consisted of  twelve
sampling times a day (every other  hour),  at which four samples were  collected,
and of two subsample enumerations  of each sample.   Samples were collected at
a constant depth of 0.2 m and distance  from the channel wall of 0.5 m.  All
species showed overwhelming diel periodicity  (shown only for the dominant
species, Simooephalus, in Figure 6).  A Nested-ANOVA gave  the  variance
components of 84% due to  sampling  time, 7% due to sample replication, and 8%
due to enumeration error.  Only 13%  of  the Simocephalus collected  were taken
during daylight  hours.  The zooplankton concentrate near vegetation  during
the daytime (i.e., attached wall algae, rock  areas, and Chora  in pools) and
most species migrate from these daytime habitats  at night  (unpublished data).
Time of day is thus critical to sampling  success.

     All samples for this  study were collected two  hours after sunset on
the nights of full and quarter  moons.   Hall,  et al., (1970) found  it necessary
also to sample at night and noted  similar diel phenomena in shallow
experimental ponds.  Zooplankton are more evenly  distributed during  dark
hours so that sampling at  night is more efficient and collections  are more
representative of existing populations  than are daytime collections.

     Zooplankton counts were converted  to biomass using literature values
for individual dry weights (Hall,  et al. ,  1970).  Although time and equipment
did not allow direct dry-weight determinations, biomass estimates  were
necessary because future  studies will relate  zooplankton standing  crop to

                                      20

-------
fish feeding patterns.  Dry weights for taxa not given by Hall were approxi-
mated by size comparison with taxa of known weight.  Average weights of
cladoceran species were approximated by assuming a one-to-one ratio of adults
to juveniles.  Adult copepod species (mostly Mesocyclops edax) were combined
intp one category and given an average dry weight of 12 yg.  The counts of
species within the genera Cepi,odaphnia3 Daphnia3 and Simooephalus were
combined by genus for the biomass conversions.

     Microcrustacean populations in Wheeler Reservoir were compared with
those in the channels through data obtained from the Nuclear Compliance
Monitoring Program, Water Quality and Ecology Branch, Division of Environmental
Planning, TVA.  Samples taken in duplicate on three dates in the reservoir,
upstream and downstream from the channel intake water pump in 1974 and 1975,
provide the data for these comparisons.
RESULT?

     Table 4 lists the species found in the channels through 1975.  The dry
weights used to convert counts to biomass for dominant species are given.
Leptodora and Diaphanasoma  (common in the reservoir) were also present but
are not included, as these  species occurred only when the channel flows were
adjusted nearly to zero.  It appears that normal channel flows are sufficient
to inhibit these two species.  The species present are typical of shallow-
water or littoral zooplankton communities.  A revised list for 1976 would
include several new colonizing species; most notable are Daphnia ambigua3 D.
catawbdj and D. parvula.  Also, the abundance of many benthic chydorid
species increased in 1976,  especially in channels with fish predation.

     Figure 7 depicts seasonal changes in total microcrustacean plankton
abundance and dry weight biomass for the months sampled in 1974 and 1975.
Zooplankton densities were  relatively low in 1974 and high in 1975.  The
decline in zooplankton in 1974 corresponded with the colonization of
filamentous algae which reached nuisance proportions by July  (see Section 4).
In 1975 the algae declined  and beds of Chora became established in pool areas.
It is apparent that dense algal growths drastically prevented zooplankton
colonization, since only in the absence of such growths did it proceed.  Had
growths of filamentous algae continued heavy in 1975, the cause/effect
relation between the algae  and zooplankton could have been investigated.  As
it was, algal densities were not high in 1975, and no definitive comment can
be made as to cause and effect.  Other factors such as anoxia, increased pH,
or H2S toxicity could have  been instrumental in causing the observed
zooplankton decline, either directly or indirectly, solely, or as a complement
to the algal abundance.

     Figure 7 also presents abundance data for total microcrustacean plankton
collected from the reservoir in the vicinity of the intake which serves as
the water source for the channels.  In 1974 the abundance was low in the
channels compared with that of the reservoir, but it was similar or higher
in 1975.
                                      21

-------
     Figure 8 shows water  temperature  in  the  channel and  abundance  data  for
individual species.  The water  temperature was  taken with a continuous
recorder.  After May 1974  there were no microcrustacean plankton populations
established of any significant  density.   In 1975  zooplankters  of several
species were abundant.  Ostracods,  absent in  1974,  colonized in 1975.  Daphniaa
Ceriodaphnia, and Bosmina  showed  the most striking  increases in abundance  in
1975.  Copepod densities were similar  in  the  two  years.   Also  depicted in
Figure 8 are densities of  Daphnia,  Bosmina, and copepods  from  Wheeler
Reservoir.  The channel was  similar to the reservoir in terms  of Bosmina and
adult copepod populations.   The dominant  copepod  in both  ecosystems was
Mesocyelops edax.

     Figure 9 shows the species composition  (percent occurrence) in terms  of
both numbers and biomass for the  dominant species given in Figure 7.  Data
are given for both parameters because  biomass alone may overemphasize the
importance of large individuals,  and numbers  alone  may overemphasize  the
importance of small, numerous individuals.  In  terms of numbers, the  small
species, Bosmina, was overwhelmingly dominant in  1974, but in  1975  no single
species dominated numerically.  Ostracods became  established after  being
absent in 1974.  In terms  of percentage biomass,  Figure 8 shows that
Simoeephalus dominated alone in 1974.  Daphnia, Simooephalus3  and ostracods
made up most of the community biomass  in  1975.  The community  composition
became more diverse and equable in  1975 compared  to 1974.

     Table 5 summarizes all  the data and  presents an overall picture  of
zooplankton colonization.  Shown  are yearly average microcrustacean
percentage occurrences in  terms of  numbers and  biomass for the channel and
numbers only for the reservoir.   About 77% of the reservoir microcrustaceans
were Bosmina followed by copepods at about 20%  (for the dates  sampled).  In
the channel in 1974 Bosmina  (47%) was  numerically dominant followed by
Simooephalus (18%) and Chydorus (15%). In 1975 Bosmina (29%), Simooephalus
(5%), and Chydorus (10%) all decreased in dominance.  Groups becoming more
extensively colonized in 1975 were  ostracods  (22%), Ceriodaphnia (13%),
Daphnia (10%), and copepods  (10%).  In 1975 five  species  each  represented
over 10% of the total community biomass;  however, there were only two such
species in 1974.
DISCUSSION

     The microcrustacean  plankton  colonizing the  channels showed  establishment
of increased diversity with  time.   The  lack of  equability in 1974 is  shown
in that Bosmina dominated numbers  and Simooephalus  dominated biomass.
Pioneer ecosystems  typically undergo such succession leading to diverse
assemblages of biota  (Odum,  1973).  It  is evident that by late 1975,  almost
two years after colonization began, there was a well-structured zooplankton
community in the channel.  Although the ecology of  individual species has
not been discussed  in detail here,  it can be concluded that the zooplankton
community in the channel  was represented primarily  by shallow-water  forms.

     The success of the channels in simulating  a  reservoir ecosystem  can be
judged in part by the diversity of biota that become colonized.  For

                                      22

-------
zooplankton investigations, the channels offer ecosystems that are relatively
easy to study but that are still as complex in species composition as most
natural ecosystems.  The channels were constructed with distinct areas of
silt pools and limestone rocks to offer habitat diversity to colonizing
organisms.  It has become increasingly evident that spatial heterogeneity in
ecosystems correlates directly with species diversity (e.g., MacArthur, 1972),
The channels are successful in terms of their potential usefulness for
studying zooplankton ecology under controlled seminatural conditions.
                                     23

-------
                   DARKNESS 1650 TO 0630 MRS.
   1150
   920
   690
cr
UJ
m
    460
    230
                                               COUNTS11 SO
            50
                                                                       tfi
                                                                       UJ
            40
                                                                       CD
            30
            2O
               tt
               UJ
               m
                                                                    10
1400     1800      2200     0200      0600
                   HOUR OFDAY(DEC. 1974)
1000
                                                                 1400
    Figure 6.   Diel periodicity of Simocephalus vetulus (large cladoceran)
      in a channel during the winter.   Diel  temperature ranges on  the
      sampling date (December 1974) were  7-15 C air and 5.5-7.5 C  water.
      Four samples were collected every other hour for a 24-hour period by
      towing a 0.3 m diameter plankton net horizontally the entire length
      of the channel (112 m) at a constant depth of 0.1 m and a constant
      distance from the channel wall of 0.5  m.
                                    24

-------
 TABLE 4.  MICROCRUSTACEAN- PLANKTON FOUND IN CHANNELS AS OF 1975.  INDIVIDUAL

   DRY WEIGHTS IN MICROGRAMS FOR CONVERTING COUNTS TO BIOMASS ARE GIVEN FOR

                               DOMINANT SPECIES
     Group
               Species
Dry Weight (yg)
Daphnidae
Sididae


Bosminidae

tfecrothricidae


Chydoridae
Cyclopoida
Calanoida
Ostracoda
Simooephalus vetulus
S. serrulatus
Daplmia laevis
D. pulex
CeriodapTrnia retieu.la.ta
C. quadrangula
Moina affinis
Seapholeberis kingi

Sida crystallina
Latona setifera

Bosmina longirostris

Maorothrix rosea
Ilyooryptus spinifer

Chydorus sphaericus
C. globosus
Disparalona rostrata (Alonella r.)
Cconptooereus rectirostris (C. similus)
Euryoerous lamellatus
Kurzia latissima
Leydigia quadrangularis (L.  leydigil
L. acanthocevcoides
Pleupoxus denticulatus
Alona sp.

Mesooyolops edax
Cyclops vernalis
C. bicuspidatus thomasi
Eucyclops agilus
E. prionophorus
Maorooyclops albidus
copepodites

Osphvantiaum labronectwn
Diaptomus sp.

(not identified)
                                                                   30.0
                                                                   30.0
                                                                   21.5
                                                                   21.5
                                                                    3.2
                                                                    3.0
      1.4
                                                                    1.5
     12.0
      2.0

     18.0


      5.0
                                      25

-------
   4OO
                                                                        40000
                                                                      - 30000
                                                                      -20000.
                                                                             OL
                                                                             Ul
                                                                             CD
                                                                      - 10000
       MAY   JUN
JUL   AUG
   1974
SEP  OCT
APR MAY   JUN  JUL  AUG   SEP
             1975
Figure 7.  Total microcrustacean  plankton density (numbers/m^)  and dry
  weight biomass (mg/m3) in a  channel  for the  1974 and 1975 sampling
  periods.  Densities of Wheeler  Reservoir microcrustaceans are given
  for comparison.  Channel density  - solid circles;  Channel biomass -
  open circles; and, Reservoir density -  solid triangles.
                                      26

-------
           APR MAY JUN  JUL AUG SEP OCT
         30
       UJ 20
         IS
e
u
i.
  5
  0
       50OO
       4OOO
       3000
       20OO
       1000
         0
      10,000
       8000
       6000
    E  4000
       2OOO
         0
       ZSOO
       200O
       1900
       IOOO
        5OO
             	1974
             	 1975
           SIMOCEPHALUS
           OSTRACODStNont In 1974)
                 974
                           310
                           975
                           1975
                 i    i   i
                           6,530
                           1975
                                              5000
                                              40OO
                                              3000
                                              2000
                                              IOOO
                                                0
                                              5000
                                              4OOO
                                              3OOO
                                              2000
                                               IOOO
                                         0
                                       IO.OOO
                                              8000
                                              60OO
                                              4000
                                              2000
                                          0
                                        2500
                                              200O
                                               1500
                                               IOOO
                                               5OO
                                                  APR  MAY JUN. JUL AUG  SEP OCT
                                                  COPEPODSlAduItt aimnwturts)
                                                             o
                                                         1974
                                                                   1975
           APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
                                                   APR MAY  JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
Figure 8.   Water temperature and density  of the seven dominant  taxa  in
  one channel  for the 1974 (solid circles)  and  1975  (solid triangles)
  sampling periods.   Wheeler Reservoir densities for the  three  taxa
  Daphnia,  Bosmina,  and  copepods (open circles  - 1974; open triangles -
  1975).
                                          27

-------
 ioo-
              PERCENT NUMBERS
  50-
 1974


   MISC.

 CHYDORUS



 BOSMINA
 COPEPOOS


CERIODAPHNIA


 DAPHNIA
                                     SIMOCEPHALUS
                                                         PERCENT BIOMASS
                                                                                 -KX)
                                                                                4-50
     I MAY  I JUN  I JUL I  AU6 I SEP I OCTl
           I  MAY  I JUN I  JUL  I AU6 I  SEP I OCTl
 100-
            PERCENT NUMBERS
  50 —
                                       1975
                                        MISC.
                                      CHYDORUS
                                      OSTRACOOS
                                      BOSMINA
                                                          PERCENT BIOMASS
                                                                                100
                                      COPEPOOS

                                     CERIODAPHNIA
                                      DAPHNIA


                                     SIMOCEPHALUS/
     I
      APR ' MAY  ' JUN '  JUL  '  AUO
                                                                              	0
           1  APR  ' MAY '  JUN  '  JUL  ' AU6
Figure 9.   Species composition in  terms  of percent numbers  and percent
  biomass  for 1974 and 1975  sampling periods.
                                         28

-------
TABLE 5.  AVERAGE PERCENT RELATIVE ABUNDANCE IN TERMS  OF  NUMBERS AND BIOMASS
 IN ONE CHANNEL AND IN TERMS OF NUMBERS IN WHEELER RESERVOIR.  THE AVERAGES
     ARE FOR MAY THROUGH OCTOBER (NINE DATES)  IN 1974  AND APRIL THROUGH
   SEPTEMBER (ELEVEN DATES)  IN 1975.   3DATA COLLECTED  IN  APRIL, JULY, AND
     OCTOBER WERE AVERAGED FOR THE RESERVOIR PERCENT RELATIVE ABUNDANCE
Channel Microcrustacean Zooplankton

Bosmina longirostris
Simocephalus vetulus, S. serrulatus
Daphnia laevis, D. pulex
Ceriodaphnia reticulata, C. quadrangula
Chydorus sphaericus
Copepodg (adults and immatures)
Ostracods
Others
Reservoir Microcrustacean Zooplankton
Bosmina longirostris
Copepods (adults and immatures)
Diaphanasoma leuchtenbergianwn
Leptodora kindtii
Daphnia retroaurvaj D. parvula
Moina minuta
Others
Percent
Numbers
1974
47
18
3
7
15
7
-
3
79
16
3
1
1
1
1
1975
29
5
10
13
10
10
22
2
75
23
2
1
1
1
1
Percent
Biomass
1974 1975
12 13
64 21
5 25
5 9
3 2
9 12
16
2 2







 Data furnished from the Nuclear Compliance Monitoring Program, Water  Quality
 and Ecology Branch, Division of Environmental Planning,  TVA.
                                     29

-------
                                  SECTION 6

                             MACROINVERTEBRATES
SCOPE

     Since summer 1974, studies of macroinvertebrates in the biothermal
channels were directed, in large part, toward identifying naturally colonizing
species and determining their rates of invasion and subsequent changes in
population size.  No species were introduced artificially; all were immigrants
either by way of Tennessee River water, air, gravid-female adults, or invasion
across land.  In two cases, organisms were transferred artificially from one
channel to another.  Crayfish (Orconectes immunis), which initially invaded
only one channel, were distributed to other channels but did not reproduce,
and snails (Physa heterostropha) were introduced to one channel which was
lacking them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS

     All twelve channels were observed and sampled, even though they differed
in presence or absence of fish, presence of the same species or numbers of
fish, or times at which they were drawn down or refilled.  The sampling carried
out was indicative, nevertheless, of certain trends or lack of trends.

     Three main sampling techniques were employed.  These reflect the three
main habitat types present in the channels—pool areas, rock areas, and walls.
Pools were sampled with a sediment corer made of a piece of PVC pipe of 23.76
on2 cross-sectional area.  Twelve cores comprised a sample in any one pool on
a particular sampling date.  Rock areas were sampled with rock-filled
galvanized trays of 0.09 m2 area on which organisms were allowed to colonize
for month-long periods.  Three trays were placed across each rock area to be
sampled.  Rocks were scrubbed with a soft brush to remove attached organisms.
Invertebrates associated with algal growths on channel walls were sampled with
a specially constructed scraping device with an attached net bag; this device
sampled an area of 0.25 m2.  Two scrapings were taken from each wall area
sampled.

     All samples were washed in a No. 70 sieve and were frozen; when thawed,
organisms were sorted and counted.  A representative subsample of each species
present was freeze-dried and weighed.

     One experiment was designed specifically to evaluate the recolonization
of macroinvertebrates during winter, since this is the period that will be of


                                       30

-------
particular importance in heated-water experiments.  Three channels were drawn
down November 5, 1975, leaving approximately 0.5 m of water remaining in pools.
The channels were refilled two months later, at which time a six-week sampling
program was begun.  Three sets of wall scrapings were taken at two-week intervals
(January 22, February 4, and February 20, 1976).  On each sampling date two
scrapings each were taken from the inlet pool, the 44-m pool, and the outlet
pool of each of the three channels.


RESULTS

     A list of all macroinvertebrates identified during the colonization
period is presented in Table 6.  Most taxa present in the channels in October
1976 were present at least intermittently during the colonization period
(Table 7).  Not all organisms present were sampled by the three standard
sampling techniques outlined.  The invasion of certain taxa was observed by
simpler means.  Odonates were observed emerging along the channel walls and
were subsequently seen laying eggs in the channels.  Fifteen anisopteran
and one zygopteran species were identified from exuviae and netted adults.
These were identified to order in quantitative samples.  Five of the
anisopteran species were present during the summer of 1974.  In both 1975
and 1976, 14 were emergent, 2 species having disappeared while 2 more invaded.
The one zygopteran species was present throughout the colonization period.

     Isolated Plumatella masses were found along the walls in the summers of
1975 and 1976.  Two of the bivalve molluscs, Eliptio crassidens and Leptodea
fpagilis were not sampled in cores but were found on the sediment near the
inlets of drawn-down channels early in 1976.  Oroonectes immunis was found
in drawn-down channels in spring 1975.  Gravid females distributed to
another channel were unsuccessful at reproducing, which may be fortunate in
light of evidence of the impact of crayfish feeding and resultant competition
with fish in an aquatic system (Magnuson, et al., 1975).

     The exuvium from one stonefly (family Perlodidae) was found at the outlet
end of one channel in May 1975.  This was the only evidence of the presence of
Plecoptera in the channels.  Certain Hemiptera and Coleoptera were captured
only by hand netting.  Belastoma sp., Ranatra sp., and Mesovilia sp. were not
seen until the summer of 1976.  Dytiscidae invaded in 1975.  Several of the
Trichoptera were found either only at the channel outlets where the current is
swift (Chimarra obscura^ Cheumatopsyehe speci-osa, and Hydropsyche betteni), or
only as adults on the channel walls (Athripsodes caneellatus3 Oecetis -inconspicua,
and Neurecl'ips'is orepuscular-Ls).  These all colonized the channels when they
were first filled.  All other Trichoptera were sampled as larvae by standard
mathods.  The only Diptera present that were not taken in regular samples were
the Simuliidae which inhabit the swift-flowing outlet areas and the Tabanidae
which were found in floating algal mats.  Both were present beginning in 1974.

     Certain genera sampled by the regular techniques were found shortly
following initial filling of the channels but were not found subsequently,
whereas the reverse was true for other genera.  Two coleopterans, Ceroyon
and Tropisternus3 were collected on rock areas in summer 1974 but not since.


                                      31

-------
     The disappearance of these genera was accompanied by the introduction of
others.  Gastropod mollusc genera increased from one (Physa heterostropha)
to five, with the appearance of Pyrgulopsis sp. and Pleurooera oanalioulatwn
in September 1975 and Lyrrmaea sp. and Helisoma sp. in February 1976.  All of
these were collected in wall scrapings.  Notoneota sp. was also first seen
in wall scraping samples in September 1975.  One ephemeropteran, Baetis
bioaudatus and two trichopterans, Orthotriohia sp. and Oxyeth-ira sp. appeared
in wall scrapings in August 1976.  The leech, Placobdella montifera appeared
in rock trays in late September 1976.

     There was great overlap in species collected in all three habitats
sampled but certain organisms were found in only one habitat.  Anodonta
•irribecilis and Corbioula manilensis were found only in pool areas.  Enallagma
sp. and Libellula sp. were collected only in rock areas but could probably
have been found with more intensive sampling in pools and along the walls.
Tramea onusta was collected only in wall scrapings but probably inhabited
other areas as well.  Notoneota sp., which was found in wall scrapings, is
probably also present in rock areas and is often seen in open water.

     Most of the invertebrate populations in the channels reached a peak
population density followed by a decline and by subsequent leveling off
(Table 8); others showed either upward or downward trends on the final
sampling date.  For pool areas, this final date was August 21, 1975, so that
estimates are not inclusive of the whole colonization period,  However, with
the exception of the bivalve molluscs and Eexagenia3 abundance peaks and
population trends of all the organisms in pool areas are reflected also in
density figures of rock and/or pool areas so that all dates in the table are
accurate.

     Several organisms showed downward trends in population size at the end
of the colonization period:  Erpobdella punotata and Helobdella sp.,
Rexagenia b-ili,neata3 Notoneeta sp., and Covbioula manilensis.  Organisms
showing population size increase were the Amphipoda, Gastropoda, and
Anodonta i-mbee-il-ls.

     In the recolonization experiment certain organisms showed increased
density following channel refilling, while others showed no particular
change.  Significance of change was shown by use of the Wilcoxon matched-pairs
signed-rank test.  Amphipoda showed increased densities on both the second
and third sampling dates while chironomids and gastropods increased in
density between the first and third, and second and third, but not the
first and second sampling dates (Table 9).  These were the only organisms
showing numerical change.  There was an increase in the summer biomasses of
the invertebrates other than the Gastropoda but these changes were not
statistically significant (Table 9).
DISCUSSION

     The most abundant organisms to colonize the channels as determined from
artificial substrates and core sampling were:  Oligochaeta, Corbiaula
manilens-is (Pelecypoda), Erpobdella punotata (Hirudinea), Hyalella azteoa

                                     32

-------
and.Crangonyx sp. (Amphipoda),  Caenis sp. (Ephemeroptera),  and Chironomidae
(Diptera).  Odonates and Eexagenla bilineata (Ephemeroptera) were also common
as determined from exuviae that were collected from the channel walls and
water surfaces.

     Diversity of macroinvertebrates in the biothermal channels is similar to
that in large mainstream reservoirs when both deep water and littoral zones
are considered.  However, certain organisms dominating reservoir fauna are
not dominant in the channels and vice versa.  Composition of pool areas in
the biothermal channels is similar to that in reservoir open water areas,
but with lower densities of Rexagenia.  Rock and wall areas in the channels
show much greater invertebrate diversity than pool areas and are similar to
littoral areas in reservoirs in having a greater number of anisopteran
odonate species and greater densities of Amphipoda than open-water areas of
reservoirs.
                                     33

-------
TABLE 6.  MACROINVERTEBRATE TAXA  IDENTIFIED  IN  BIOTHERMAL CHANNELS DURING

                            COLONIZATION  PERIOD
          Porifera



          Hydrazoa



          Ectopr'octa



          Nematoda

          Platyhelminthes

               Turbellaria



          Mollusca

               Pelecypoda
                Gastropoda

                     Pulmonata
Spongilla sp.
Hydra sp.
Pluma-tefLa sp.
Dugesia tigvina
                                         Anodonta irribecilis
                                         Eliptio arassidens
                                         Leptodea fragilis
                                         Corbicula manilens-is
                                         Physa heterostropha
                                         Lymnaea sp.
                             Planorbidae

                     Ctenobranchia
                                         P~ieurocera aanal-icu'lata
                                         Pyrgulopsis letsoni.
          Aniielida

                Oligochaeta

                Hirudinea
                                      34

-------
TABLE 6 (continued)
                                        Helobdella sp.
                                        Erpobdella punetata
                                        Plaoobdella mont-Lfera
          Arthropoda

               Crustacea

                    Decapoda



                    Amphipoda
Orconeetes irrmunis
                                        Hyalella azteca
                                        Crangonyx sp.

               Arachnida

                    Hydracarina

               Insecta

                    Collembola

                    Ephemeroptera

                              Heptageniidae

                                        Stenonema sp.

                              Ephemeridae

                                        Hexagenia bilineata

                              Baetidae

                                        Baetis bicaudatus
                                        Callibaetis fluctuans
                                        Caenis sp.

                    Odonata

                         Anisoptera

                              Gomphidae

                                        Dromogomphus spoliatus
                                    35

-------
TABLE 6 (continued)
                               Libellulidae

                                         Epioordulia princeps
                                         Epicordulia vegina
                                         PaohydLplax long-ipennis
                                         Erythemis  simplicicolHs
                                         Libellula  pulchella
                                         Libellula  luctuosa
                                         Libellula  forens-is
                                         Plathemis  lydia
                                         Perithemis tenera
                                         Pantala hymenea
                                         Pantala flavesaens
                                         Tramea  onusta
                                         Maoromia taeniolata
                                         Maaromia -ill-ino-lensis

                           Zygoptera

                               Coenagrionidae

                                         Enallqgma  civile

                Plecoptera

                               Perlodidae

                Hemiptera

                               Belastomatidae

                                         Belastoma  sp.

                               Nepidae

                                         Eanatva sp.

                               Notonectidae

                                         Notoneota  sp.

                               Mesoveliidae

                                         Mesovelia  sp.

                Trichoptera

                               Philopotamidae
                                     36

-------
TABLE,6 (continued)
                                         Chimarra  obsoura

                               Psychomyiidae
                                         Cyrnellue fraternus
                                         Neurealipsis arepuscularis
                               Hydropsychidae
                                         Cheimatopsyche  speeiosa
                                         Hydropsyche betteni
                               Hydroptilidae
                                         Eycbcopt-ila waubes-Lana
                                         Orthotin,ohia  sp.
                                         Oxyethira sp.
                               Leptoceridae
                                         Athripsodes  oancellatus
                                         Oecet-is  -Lnoonsp-Lcua
                Coleoptera

                               Hydrophilidae
                                         Ceroyon  sp.
                                         Berosus  sp.
                                         Tropisternus  sp.
                               Dytiscidae

                Diptera

                               Simuliidae

                               Chironomidae

                                    Chironominae
                                         Glyptotendipes sp.
                                         Diorotendipes  fumidus
                                         Diarotendipes  modestus
                                         Paratany.tapsus sp.

                                    Orthocladiinae
                                     37

-------
TABLE 6 (continued)
                                          Cricotopus (Isooladius)  Sylvestris
                                            group
                                          Pseudosmitt-La sp.

                                     Tanypodinae

                                          Tanypus (Apelopia)  neopunatipennis

                                Ceratopogonidae

                                          Probeszia sp.

                                Tabanidae

                                          Chrysops sp.

                                Blephariceridae
                                     38

-------
               TABLE  7.  MACROINVERTEBRATE TAXA OBSERVED IN THREE SAMPLE AREAS ON SUCCEEDING  DATES

                                          Rocks                              Pools                     Walls

                                 ^3"                                 •>3"
                             "•d".  Is**   LO   LO  iO   i-O   IO   vO    *^"   r**   LO   lO   iO   LO   tO   to    IO   VO   vO   vO   vO
  Dugesia sp.                ******        *                        *         ***
  Spongi-lta sp.
  Hydra sp.                                                                                               *   *
  Nematoda                                                *****           *                 ***
  Oligochaeta                *******        ********     ***       *
*° Erpobdella • punotata                ******    ********             ***
  Helobdella sp.             *******                         ****                *
  Hydracarina                                                                                             *   *   *
  Amphipodat                 ********        *                              ***
  Crangonyx sp.                                                                                               *   *
  Hyalella azteca                                                               *   *   *   *                 *   *
  Collembola                                                                                          *        *
  Eexagenia b-Llineata            *           *   *    *        *            *   *
  Stenonema sp.              **                             *                                  ****
  Caenis sp.                 ********    ********     ****
  Callibaetis fluctuans      *****                                                   *
  Epioordulia sp.                *                    *                                 *                 *       *

-------
TABLE 7 (continued)
                                       Rocks                             Pools                      Walls

Erythemis simplicicollis
Pantala sp.
Plathemis lydia
Tvamea onusta
°Enallagma civile
Corixidae
Notoneata sp.
Berosus sp.
Cevoyon sp.
Tropistemus sp.
Hydroptila waubesiana
Afhripsodes oanoellatus
Cyrnellus fraternus
Probezzia sp.
Chironomidae
Chrysops. sp.
* * * * *
* * * * *

*
* * * * * *
* ******
* *
* *
*
*
* * * * *
*
* . * * *
******
********
*
*
* *
*
*
* *
* * * * * * *
* *
* * * *


* * * * *

* *
******* *
******** * * * * *


-------
 TABLE 7 (continued)
                                             Rocks                             Pools                       Walls

                                                                      si-
                                               ioioiovo    -3-1—   101/110101010    lovo^ovovo
                                               r-   i~~   i—   r--    r-.   ^^   r^i—    r^-i^-r^-r^-    i^.i^r~-i^r^
                                               r~-oocriCN    r^-iHrHCMiovor^oo    o>    1-1   CN   sf   in
  Belepharlceridae                                                                                                   *
  Gastropodat                 ********    ********
i |
  Lymnaea sp.                                                                                                     *   *
  Physa heterostropha                                                                               *****
  Pyrgulopsis  letsoni                                                                               *        *   *   *
  Plewcooeva canal-Loulata
  Helisoma                                                                                                    *
  Pelecypodat                     *
  Anodonta irrbecilis                                                              *   *   *    *
  Corbioula manilensis                                          *.*   *   *    *   *   *    *

  t Taxon used before genera were identified.

-------
         TABLE 8.   POPULATION TRENDS OF TAXA SAMPLED IN CHANNELS BETWEEN SUMMER,  1974 AND SPRING,  1976
to
Date of Peak
Abundance Habitat
Dugesia sp.
Nematoda
Oligochaeta
Erpobdella punctata
Helobdella sp.
Amphipoda
Hexagenia b-it-Lnsata
Stenonema sp.
Caenis sp.
Callibaet-is fluotuans
Anisoptera
Enallagma oivila
Corixidae
Notonecta sp.
Bex>osus sp.
Hydroptila waubesiana
10/74
1/75
1/75
7/75
7/75
2/76
2/75
10/74
12/74
9/75
10/74
10/74
7/75
9/75
2/75
10/74
rocks
pools
pools
pools
pools
rocks
pools
rocks
pools
walls
rocks
rocks
rocks
walls
pools
rocks
Estimated Direction of Approximate Stable
No./m2aat Population Population Density (No./m2)
Peak Density Change Spring 1976
603
420
10,276
1,192
193
3,194
35
9
3,753
45
24
14
241
9
35
340
1 	 cv20
1 ^ MO
1 ^ i/lOO
1
1
t
I
— »* ^
!_». ^50
I—*. ^5
1
| 	 ^. o-10
1 	 ^ ^5
1 	 ^. %2
1
L^. ^2
1 	 ^. %5

-------
TABLE 8 (continued)
Date of Peak
Abundance Habitat
Cyrnellus fraternus
Pvdbezzia sp.
Chironomidae
Gastropoda
Anodonta -imbeoilis
Corbicula manilensis
8/75
12/74
5/76
5/76
8/75
7/75
rocks
pools
walls
walls
pools
pools
Estimated Direction of Approximate Stable
No./m2 at Population Population Density (No./m2)
Peak^ Density Change"3 Spring 1976
63
420
1,001
532
113
6,039
1
1— ^ ^20
t
t
t
1
  Mean of all samples taken in a particular habitat on one date.
  Explanation of symbols.





   T     = Increase




   T     = Decline




   I ^   = Decline and leveling off

-------
TABLE 9.  NUMBERS AND DRY WEIGHTS (mg) OF ORGANISMS PER m2 ON WALL AREAS ON SUCCESSIVE SAMPLING DATES
  IN 1976.  (1:  JANUARY 22, 2:  FEBRUARY 4, 3:  FEBRUARY 20).  DATA REPRESENT TWO SAMPLES PER WALL
                                 AREA, AVERAGED AMONG THREE CHANNELS
a)
n)
0)
fc
H
D5


Mean numbers per m2
AMPHIPODA
Sampling Date
1
1 24
1 36
3 184
3 76
6 16
6 16
1-2*
2-3*
1-3*
2
344
468
284
184
48
96



3
888
1016
592
316
140
152



CHIRONOMIDAE
Sampling
1
- 1 92
8 1 236
< 3 363
rH 3 371
3 6 245
6 115
1-2 ns
1-3*
2-3*
2
160
169
535
701
400
256



Date
3
1180
1036
1388
2120
728
956



GASTROPODA
Sampling Date
cfl

-------
                                REFERENCES
Biswar, S.  1969.  The Volta Lake:  Some ecological observations on the
     phytoplankton.  Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol.  17:  259-272.

Cummins, K. W., R. R. Costa, R. E. Rowe, G.  A.  Moshiri,  R.  M.  Scanlon,
     and R. K. Zajdel.  1969.  Ecological energetics of  a natural population
     of the predaceons zooplankter Leptodova k-indt-L-L Fock (Cladocera).
     Oikos  20: 189-223.

Funk, W. H., and A. R. Gaufin.  1971.  Phytoplankton productivity in a
     Wyoming cooling-water reservoir.  Pages 167-178 In  G.  E.  Hall, ed.
     Reservoir fisheries and limnology.  Spec.  Publ. No. 8.  Amer. Fish.
     Soc., Washington.

Hall, D. J., W. E. Cooper, and E. E. Werner.  1970.  An  experimental
     approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal
     communities.  Limnol. Oceanogr.  15(6): 839-928.

Hutchinson, G. E.  1967.  A treatise on limnology.  Vol. II.   Introduction
     to lake biology and limnoplankton.  John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
     1115 pp.

Hutchinson, G. E.  1975.  A treatise on limnology.  Vol. III.   Limnological
     botany.  John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.  660 pp.

Leentvaar, P.  1966.  The Brokopondo Lake in Surinam. Verh.  Int. Ver.
     Limnol.  16: 680-684.

MacArthur, R. H.  1972.  Geographical ecology.   Harper and Row, New York.
     269 pp.

Magnuson, John J., Gregory M. Capelli, James G. Lorman,  and Roy A. Stein.
     1975.  Consideration of crayfish for macrophyte control.   Rept. No.
     ENV 07-75-1 Univ. of Florida, Gainesville.

Odum, E. P.  1971.  Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.).  W.  B.  Saunders  Co.,
     Philadelphia.  574 pp.

Rodhe, W.  1964.  Effects of impoundment on water chemistry and plankton
     in Lake Ransaren (Swedish Lappland).  Verh. Int. Ver.  Limnol.  15: 437-443.

Wetzel, R. G.  1975.  Limnology.  W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.-  743 pp.

Zhadin, V. I., and S. V. Gerd.  1961.  Fauna and flora of the rivers, lakes,
     and reservoirs of the U.S.S.R.  Keter Press,  Jerusalem.

                                     45

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
   EPA-600/3-78-020
            3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-N.0.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Browns Ferry  Biothermal Research  Series I.
  Colonization  by Periphyton, Zooplankton, and
  Macro-Invertebrates     	
                                                            5. REPORT DATE
                                                               February 1978 issuing date
            6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  Brian J. Armitage, Thomas D. Forsythe,  Elizabeth B.
  Rodgers, and William B. Wrenn
            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Tennessee Valley Authority
  FF&WD - Biothermal Research  Facility
  P.O. Box  2000
  Decatur, Alabama  35602
            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

              1BA608
            11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

              TV-35013A
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental Research  Laboratory—Duluth, MN
  Office of Research and  Development
  U.S.  Environmental Protection.Agency
  Duluth,  Minnesota  55804
            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               Interim
            14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
              EPA/ 600/03
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  Research  performed in  cooperation with Tennessee Valley Authority, Morris,  Tennessee
  37828
16. ABSTRACT

  Colonization studies on a series  of  12 outdoor experimental  channels supplied with
  water from Wheeler Reservoir  (Tennessee River) were completed  at the Browns Ferry
  Biothermal Research Station in Alabama.  Species composition,  dominance, seasonal
  patterns,  colonization rates, and biomass estimates were determined over a 24-month
  period  for periphyton, zooplankton,  and macroinvertebrates.  In general, the
  species composition and the relative densities of algal and  invertebrate organisms
  that colonized the channels indicated that the channels successfully simulate
  reservoir  ecosystems for those trophic levels.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                               b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C.  COS AT I Field/Group
  Zooplankton
Colonization
Experimental  channels
Periphyton
Macroinvertebrates
                                                                             50  B
                                                                             68  D
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
  Release to public
                                               19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport}
                                                                          !1. NO. OF PAGES
                                                                              54
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                                          22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                              46

-------
                                                      INSTRUCTIONS

1.   REPORT NUMBER
     Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

2.   LEAVE BLANK

3.   RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
     Reserved for use by each report recipient.

4.   TITLE AND SUBTITLE
     Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
     type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
     number and include subtitle for the specific title.

5.   REPORT DATE
     Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year.  Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date of
     approval, date of preparation,  etc.].

6.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
     Leave blank.

7.   AUTHOR(S)
     Give name(s) in conventional order (John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.).  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
     zation.

8.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT  NUMBER
     Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.

9.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
     Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.

10.  PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
     Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

11.  CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
     Insert contract or grant number under which  report was prepared.

12.  SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
     Include ZIP code.

13.  TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
     Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.

14.  SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
     Leave blank.

15.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
     Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as:  Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of, Presented at conference of,
     To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc.

16.  ABSTRACT
     Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
     significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.

17.  KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
     (a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the major
     concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.

     (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
     ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.

     (c) COSATI FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COS ATI Subject Category List. Since the ma-
     jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
     endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s)  will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
     the primary posting(s).

18.  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
     Denote releasability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited."  Cite any availability to
     the public,  with address and price.

19. &20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
     DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

21.  NUMBER OF PAGES
     Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.

22.  PRICE
     Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
                                                                       « U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE-1978—T i-J '-
    EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73) (Reverje)

-------