United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water Planning
and Standards
Washington, DC 20460
December 1979
Water
&EPA FY80 Work Programs
Water Planning
Division
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Water Planning
and Standards
Washington, DC 20460
December 1979
Water
vvEPA
FY80 Work Programs
Water Planning
Division
-------
INTRODUCTION
The program strategy and FY 80 work program of the Water Planning Division
have been developed to assure that the Agency's water quality management
objectives will be met in a timely and cost effective manner. The work
programs are based on the national water quality management strategy.
The work programs are intended to meet the national goals and objectives
and are tied to complementary Regional work programs necessary to carry
through these goals, objectives, and priorities at State, areawide, and
local levels.
The work programs describe the organization's functions and internal
relationships, priority programs and objectives, major tasks and accomp-
lishments scheduled for each of the Branches in the Water Planning Division
in support of the national water quality management program. These activities
are related primarily to the implementation of Sections 208 and 106 of the
Clean Water Act and of OWWM policy and program integration initiatives with
respect to the State/EPA Agreement concept.
The FY1980 work program reflects our continuing emphasis on providing
more timely strategy and program guidance, improving program management
and program integration, establishing an effective State/EPA Agreement
and evaluation process, assuring necessary technology development for
solving critical nonpoint source control problems, implementing a
management information system, including implementation data, and
providing for targeted communication and technology transfer with
respect to program policies and accomplishments.
Accomplishment of these tasks require a coordinated and complementary
work planning and implementation process. Regional Offices and grantee
agencies should review carefully the tasks, outputs, and timelines in these
work programs to incorporate appropriate tasks, outputs and timelines in
their own annual work planning, tracking, and evaluation processes.
Comments and questions on these materials are invited and should be
addressed to the responsible Water Planning Division staff identified in
the following functional listing.
-------
WATER PLANNING DIVISION
Name
IMMEDIATE OFFICE
Merna Hurd
Peter Wise
Dave Green
Marjorie Pitts
POLICY AND EVALUATION BRANCH
Immediate Office
David Ziegler
Jerry Kotas
Policy Development Section
Rita Horgan
Policy Coordination/
SEA Section
Loretta Marzetti
Evaluation Section
Lin Eichmiller
Title
Director
Acting Deputy Director
Physical Science Coordinator
Program Analyst
Acting Branch Chief
Environmental Protection
Special ist
Environmental Protection
Specialist
Program Analyst
Acting Section Chief
Telephone £
Area Code: 202
755-6928
755-7000
245-3154
755-7003
426-2474
426-2474
755-6023
755-6023
426-2522
Areas of Responsibility
Overall Management
Overall Management
Interagency Coordination
Program Evaluation Process
Branch Management and Coordination
Groundwater; 102(d) Report
WQM Five Year Strategy; WQM
Guidance Materials
Regional Policy Coordination; SEA's
Needs Assessment; WQM Accomplishments
WQM Policy Evaluation
-------
Name
IMPLEMENTATION BRANCH
Carl Myers
Urban NFS Section
Dennis Athayde
Rural NPS Section
Walt Rittal
Title
Acting Branch Chief
Section Chief
Section Chief
Faci1ities Management Section
Carl Myers Dual Capacity
OPERATIONS BRANCH
Immediate Office
Robert Hardaker
Henry Cooke
Branch Chief
Program Analyst
Financial Management Section
Paul Kraman Section Chief
Public Involvement Section
Robert Hardaker
Dual Capacity
Telephone # Areas of Responsibility
Area Code: 202
755-4911
254-3154
755-9231
755-4911
755-2117
755-2117
755-7003
755-2117
Branch Management and Coordination
Nationwide Urban Runoff Program
Rural Clean Water Program; MIP/ACP
Projects; USDA Coordination;
Construction, Silviculture, Mining NPS
AWT Projects Management; Construction
Grants Management Coordination; WQS/WLA
Coordination
Branch Management and Coordination
Management Information Systems;
ZBB Development
Financial Management Assistance Project;
Grants Coordination and Tracking;
205(g)/106 Coordination
Public Involvement; Communications/
Publications; Interest Groups
Liaison
-------
ERRATA
FY 1980 WORK PLANS
Water Planning Division
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Water Planning Division
Management Evaluation 1
Policy and Evaluation Branch
Program Evaluation Section 3
Policy Development Section 13
Pol icy Coordination/SEA Section 53
Implementation Branch
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Program 66
Silvicultural Nonpoint Source Program 83
Construction Nonpoint Source Program 88
Mining Nonpoint Source Program 90
Advanced Waste Treatment Program . 91
National Urban Runoff Program 108
Operations Branch
Public Involvement Section 188
Financial Management Section 198
-------
JOB NO 80-WPD-l
MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. Develop and implement a management evaluation system to
provide an accurate assessment of the management of the WQM process
including the effectiveness of the Regional Offices, State and Head-
quarters activities in the WQM process; to assist Regional Offices,
States and Headquarters with their own activities and improve their
management of the WQM process; and to identify problems and issues
faced at each management level, recommend possible alternative solutions,
if appropriate; and, assist Headquarters define resource needs, and changes
in program direction to resolve or contain problems.
Method. Touche Ross and Company has developed a Management Framework
that identifies and clarifies the roles and responsibilities of each
management level in the WQM process. A pilot test and the Management
Framework is underway in Region III and in the State of Maryland. Based
upon the Management Framework and input from Regional Offices and State
and areawide agencies, a management evaluation system and criteria will
be developed.
The evaluation system and criteria will be used for the review of each
Regional Office WQM process this fiscal year.
Product. A comprehensive report on the management of the WQM process
which can be utilized in a constructive manner by Regional Offices,
States, and Headquarters to improve the management of the WQM program.
-------
JOB NO 80-WPD-l
Tasks.
a.
b.
modify management framework
interviews with HQs,
start
Oct 20, 79
Oct 29, 79
finish
Jan 1, 80
Nov 2, 79
fol 1 ows
Region III and Maryland
on program elements to
be evaluated
c. integrate the management Nov 2, 79 Dec 3, 79
framework, policy guidance &
program elements to be evalu-
ated into a preliminary draft
of management evaluation
criteria and system
d. review and revision of the Dec 3, 79 Dec 12, 79
management evaluation
criteria and system
e. send Information Memorandum Dec 14, 79
to Regional Office requesting
comments on the draft manage-
ment evaluation criteria and
system
f. Regional review and draft Dec 16, 79 Jan 25, 80
g. request review by 6 States Dec 18, 79 Jan 25, 80
selected by ASIWPCA and 4
areawides selected by NARC
h. discuss Regional Offices,1 Jan 30, 80
State and areawide agencies'
comments on draft criteria
and system at WQM Coordinators
Meeting
i. finalize WQM evaluation Jan 31, 80 Mar 1, 80
system and criteria
j. send WQM evaluation system Mar 1, 80
and criteria to Regions
k. schedule Regional Office Mar 15, 80 Apr 1, 80
evaluations
1. conduct evaluations Apr 15, 80 Sept 30, 80
-------
EVALUATION SECTION WORK PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The first priority of the Evaluation Section is to complete the
Needs Assessment. The second priority is to establish a role for the
Section in evaluating aspects of the program that are of concern to
management, to help support the Branch and the Division as a whole in
policy-making and management. The first six months of FY 80 will largely
be spent on the Needs Assessment, and the last six months on specific
evaluation projects. Evaluation Section staff will also continue to
perform a variety of tasks besides evaluation, and the work plans of
this and other sections reflect this.
Specific tasks
1. Needs Assessment
2. Needs Assessment update
3. Needs Assessment follow-up
4. Program evaluation
5. Tech transfer
6. Coordination with General Counsel
-------
JOB NO. 80-ES-l
JOB DESCRIPTION: Needs Assessment
PURPOSE
The primary purposes of the Needs Assessment are to:
1. Justify section 106, 208 and 314 funding levels to OMB, Congress
and the rest of EPA, and document requests for increased funding,
2. Help EPA manage the 106 program better by providing some indication
of where the money is going; and
3. Provide information that might help in developing 106 policy or
runding allocation formulas.
METHOD
Cost estimates are developed in two tracks. In Track 1, the Regions
collect estimates made by the States. The section, in coordination with
other Headquarters offices and the Regions, is developing a format for
State cost information. The Regions will be primarily responsible for
collecting the information, although Evaluation Section staff will
provide some assistance. In Track 2, Headquarters develops its own
estimates in a five step process. First, typical activities for each
Clean Water Act program covered by the assessment are listed. Second,
costs are assigned to these activities. Third, problem indicators
identifying the extent of the problem within a State are developed.
-------
Fourth, the specific States which need programs are determined. Finally,
needs are .calculated based on the above factors.
The Evaluation Section has been working with this approach since
June and we expect to finish the draft results in late March,
END PRODUCT
A report indicating funding needs under sections 106, 208 and 314
for FY 81-84 will be distributed. The report will be used by the Evaluation Section to
develop recommendations on changes in 106 and 208 management and policy.
(See discussion of Program Evaluation.)
Tasks
start
finish
a. revise format for collecting information
from States
b. complete testing the format in pilot States
c. collect data from States
d. finish cost estimates under Track 2
e. prepare draft report and circulate for
comment
f. comment period finished
g. publish N/A
Nov. 14
Dec. 7
Oct. 17
Oct. 31
Dec. 14
Jan. 15
March 1
March 10
April 1
-------
JOB NO. 80-ES-2
JOB DESCRIPTION: Needs Assessment Update
PURPOSE
After completing the Needs Assessment, the Evaluation Section will begin
to develop an in-house data base for the assessment of needs. This will save
time and effort in any future Needs Assessment and will provide valuable
information for other Branch projects.
METHOD
The Section will organize an on-going collection of information to
update and improve current Assessment files. We will build on techniques
developed elsewhere in the Division (e.g., MIS) and in the current
Assessment, where we have established methods, clarified definitions,
goals and the scope of the Assessment, and assembled the information.
After the method for the follow-up has been established, information
will be collected by the Evaluation staff member responsible for developing
Track 2 for each program (e.g., Agriculture, NPDES).
END PRODUCT
The output will be updated with complete files on all problem/program
categories which contain the necessary background information and available
cost data to the assessments of needs.
Tasks start finish
a. assemble collected information into May 1 May 15
filing system
b. identify gaps in these files May 15 May 30
c. .identify contact in HQ, Regions, or States June 1 July 30
who can provide necessary information
d. establish method for improving current files July 1 July 15
and regularly updating them
e. improve and update files at predetermined July 15 —
intervals
-------
JOB NO. 80-ES-3
JOB DESCRIPTION: Needs Assessment Followup
PURPOSE
This work will assure that the Needs Assessment is used for the
purposes outlined in the Needs Assessment job description. It should
reflect decisions on 106 policy and management in response to the 106
evaluation. (See Evaluation Section Job No. 4).
METHOD
The Evaluation Section will develop a strategy for using the Needs
Assessment to justify funding levels. The strategy will be based on our
experience with the previous Needs Assessment, discussions with appropriate
ASIWPCA, OMB, EPA and Congressional personnel, and WPD's experience with
justifying the 208 program to Congress and OMB. The strategy should.be
developed soon enough for the actual drafting of the Needs Assessment
report to reflect the strategy.
The use of the Needs Assessment for 106 policy and management
within the Agency will depend on the role that WPD wants to establish
for itself in this area. The 106 Evaluation (see Job Description No. 4)
should help to focus the issues in this area.
END PRODUCT
"Adequate" levels of 106 funding, sensible 106 policy, and effective
106 management.
Tasks start finish
a. develop strategy for using the December 15 January 15
Needs Assessment to justify funding
levels
b. develop strategy for using April 1 May 1
Needs Assessment for 106 policy and
management
c. prepare decision package to determine August 1 September 1
whether another Needs Assessment
should be conducted
-------
JOB NO. 80-ES-4
JOB DESCRIPTION: Program Evaluation
PURPOSE
The Evaluation Section has done little actual evaluation work over
the past year. One of the major tasks of the Section is determining
what aspects of the program should be evaluated, and how these evaluations
should be conducted. This might become the major role for the Section
in the second half of the fiscal year, after the Needs Assessment is
completed.
There are three aspects to the Evaluation Section's role: identifying
where policy may be necessary, assisting in its development, and evaluating
its effectiveness. The Evalution Section's role will be designed to
minimize overlaps with other WPD evaluation systems and the evaluation
systems built into NURP. It differs from the Regional Office Evaluation,
in that the Section will evaluate the effectiveness of policy in achieving
the goals of the program, rather than the success or failure of the
Regions in carrying out existing policy.
METHOD
In the first six months, the Section will develop a process for
deciding how and when to conduct evaluations. In the last six months,
more time will be spent conducting the evaluations. WPD management,
rather than the Evaluation Section, will make the final determination on
the specific evaluation projects to be undertaken.
The Section tentatively plans to start two evaluation projects in
the first six months of FY 80: (1) an evaluation of the implementation
of the revised WQM regulations, and (2) an evaluation of policy and
management options for. the 106 program. Both of these will support policy
changes planned in the Policy Section work program.
-------
The WQM regulation evaluation. This evaluation will identify
significant issues and problems that have arisen in implementing the
revised regulations. The Section will conduct a systematic survey of
the Regions to identify problems they have had. Lawsuits on the new
regulations will be analyzed for their policy implications. Specific
issues include:
integration of 106, 308 and 315 into a consolidated WQM program
effectiveness of the significant implementation policy
The discrete output of this evalution will be a paper listing and discussing
the issues, and making recommendations. This study will also serve as a
test case to help determine the scope and method of other evaluation
projects.
The 106 Program Evaluation will assess options for 106 policy and
management including allocation formulas. It will be based, to a large
extent, on information gathered during the Needs Assessment, and will
consider the relationship between funding priorities and identified
needs. This project will be conducted in close coordination with the
Policy Development Section's activities in establishing 106 policy and
guidance.
Other potential topics for future evaluation include the policy of
not funding point sources, the effectiveness of the prototype approach
in accomplishing program objectives, and possible restructuring of the
WQM program.
END. PRODUCT
Evaluations of program issues that are of concern to management.
-------
Tasks start finish
a. develop tentative process for conducting January 1 January 21
evaluations
b. develop tentative list of potential Januray 1 January 21
subjects for evaluation
c. management determines priorities for January 21 February 7
conducting evaluations
d. refine process for conducting evaluations February 7 March 1
e. conduct evaluations April 1 —
10
-------
JOB NO. 80-ES-5
JOB DISCRETION: Technical Transfer Handbook
PURPOSE
This project is intended to help spread information concerning
successful WQM prototype projects and other WQM implementation and
planning activities.
METHOD
The handbook will be organized by problem area (e.g., ground water,
silviculture). Within each area, studies will be classified as either
Problem Identification, Solution Identification, Solution Implementation,
and Evaluation. The handbook will focus on successful studies and
implementation efforts with broad applicability to other WQM programs.
END PRODUCT
A tech transfer handbook in loose!eaf form that can be distributed
to State and areawide WQM agencies and periodically updated.
Tasks
a. develop criteria and examples for tech
transfer handbook
b. develop system for obtaining information
from agencies
c. prepare and/or edit write-ups
d. develop method for distribution
e. disseminate first version
f. update periodically
start
Ongoing
February 20
April
June
June
finish
March 12
March 19
June
11
-------
JOB NO. 80-ES-6
JOB DESCRIPTION: Coordination with General Counsel
Occasionally, EPA is sued or threatened with lawsuits on issues that
have some relevance to the WQM program. Evaluation Section staff works
with 06C in developing responses to the lawsuits, and in assuring that
WPD concerns are properly appreciated. Issues that we are presently
involved in include:
1. Colville Indians - designation as 208 agency
2. Colorado River salinity litigation
3. Northwest Colorado COG - instream flow litigation
4. National Wildlife Federation - hydroelectric dams as point
sources
5. Patuxent River Basin - total maximum daily loads
6. Bassa v. Gonzales - 208 spending for air quality planning
7. WASH COG - funding of municipal facilities elements
12
-------
POLICY DEVELOPMENT SECTION
FY 80 WORK PLAN
OCTOBER 1979
13
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
A. REGULATIONS
1. Technical Update of WQM Regulations
2. Dredge and Fill regulations
B. STRATEGIC PLANNING
1. Five Year Strategy Update
2. Ground Water Strategy
3. OWWM Strategy Coordination
4. 208 Completion Options
5. Annual Operating Guidance
C. POLICY DEVELOPMENT
1. 106 Policy and Guidance
2. WQM Policy Memo Development
3. WQM 81 Guidance Package
4. Work Program Guidance
5. 313 Follow-up
D. MISCELLANEOUS
1. Reauthorization of 208
2. Ground Water Project Management
3. Research and Development Needs
4. Participation in Clean Air Act Working Group
5. Water Qua.lity/Water Quantity Coordination Study
6. Contingencies/Administration
14
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
From the initiation of the WQM program in FY 1974 to FY 1978, policy
development had been fragmented among the Division Office and the various
branches of the Water Planning Division (WPD). In FY 1979 the Policy and
Evaluation Branch, and specifically, the Policy Development Section (PDS),
provided a focal point for policy development. The PDS identified policy
development needs, kept abreast of evolving EPA policies, developed an
annual WQM strategy, followed up on the strategy, and worked on broad policy
issues. The section also worked closely with WPD staff and others to
ensure that WQM policy was clear, complete, internally consistent, up-to-
date, and in harmony with other EPA policies. In FY 80 PDS will continue
with these activities, and initiate additional tasks.
B. Recent and Current Activities
In FY 79, several major events occurred which affected the WQM
program in the area of management.
Management. EPA is initiating a more active, rather than reactive,
management stance for the WQM program. The Division has developed and
is implementing a five year management and technical strategy. The
strategy emphasizes national priorities that focus on sources of pollution
and are consistent with OMB directives. Through revised Water Quality
Management regulations promulgated in May, 1979, the Water Quality Manage-
ment program is streamlined and is focusing on maximizing the use of
limited financial resources.
Along with this more-active management stance, EPA is using a prototype
project approach for 208 grants to solve priority problems, as expressed in
the WQM five year strategy. Several consultant consortia are assisting the
WQM program to develop, test, and transfer the results of these prototypes
to similiar areas across the country.
National priority 208 projects which Headquarters will track and provide
technical assistance to during FY 80 include eight to ten ground water
cases studies, three silviculture projects, approximately five agricul-
ture projects with intensive monitoring and evaluation consistent with
Water Planning Division's agricultural strategy, and ten financial manage-
ment assistance projects related to nonpoint sources.
In addition to these prototype projects, Headquarters will support, as
208 funds are available, national priorities without extensive tracking and
also other nonpoint source problem-solving activities essential to filling a
need in the State's WQM process.
15
-------
-2-
Fundlng. As stated above, a high priority for the WQM program under
sections 106 and 208 is more active management of the program. Another
high priority is completion of the 208 portion of the program by 1984.
Priority problem activities are discussed under the Management section,
above. The major elements of EPA's funding policy for managing 208 grants
and achieving the management priorities, are as follows:
— Needs-oriented funding. Headquarters will allocate the FY 80
208 funds on the basis of need. Each Region must demonstrate
that it has sufficient needs to meet the funding criteria to
receive its funding target. An important aspect of the needs-
oriented policy is attention to priorities.
-- Annualized work planning process. Regions, States and area-
• wides will begin to develop work programs in advance of the
start of each fiscal year so that as soon as appropriations
are available, the Regions can make grant awards based on
approved work programs. EPA will not carry over funds from
one fiscal year to the next.
~ Emphasis on implementation. The WQM regulations limit 208
funds to agencies which are implementing significant portions
of their WQM plans. Projects must result in hard outputs which
are part of an overall implementation plan.
— Restriction to nonpoint source problems. EPA will limit 208
funds in FY 80 and beyond to only nonpoint source problem-
solving efforts.
— Limitations on award. The Regional Offices will assure that
208 grantees meet the conditions of the WQM regulations and
EPA policy with respect to work plan approvals, State/EPA
Agreement completion, evidence of implementation, and other
1 imitations.
16
-------
II. FY 80 TASKS—POLICY DEVELOPMENT SECTION
17
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-A1
TECHNICAL UPDATE OF WQM REGULATIONS
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To assess the recently-completed WQM regulations to determine if
problems exist. To highlight these problems, if any, and determine the
appropriate action(s).
Method. (1) Conduct a thorough review, coordinated with PES, of the WQM
regulations; (.2) Develop a paper covering the review, noting any problems.
Include a recommendation section. (3) Consider any comments the Division
has received on the WQM regulations. Solicit input from the Regions,
States and other affected and interested parties. (4) Plan technical re-
visions as necessary for FY 81.
End Product. Memorandum describing problems and recommendations. Prelim-
inary actions for regulation revision as appropriate.
17b
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-A1
Tasks Start Finish
a. review/assess WQM regs April 1, 1980 April 16, 1980
b. consider comments on the WQM regs April 1, 1980 April 16, 1980
received by the Division
c. draft memo, "Review of WQM April 21, 1980 May 1, 1980
Regulations"
d. circulate for comments May 1, 1980 May 18, 1980
e. issue final paper/recommendations May 20, 1980 June 15, 1980
f. begin preliminary work on technical June 15, 1980 0/G
revisions-, as needed
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-A2
DREDGE AND FILL REGULATIONS
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To develop EPA policy on the implementation of Section 208(b)(4)(B)
relating to BMP's for small dredge or fill operations, and to communicate
that policy through an addition to the Subpart G regulations and a policy
memorandum.
Method. The Division has done much of the necessary background work on this
job. The Division has published a BMP handbook on dredge/fill operations,
and has prepared draft regulatory language on dredge and fill to add to the
Subpart G Regulations. After the Criteria and Standards Division (OWPS)
publishes its regulations on the Section 404 dredge/fill program, WPD will
propose its regulation on 208(b)(4)(B). Public and interagency comments on
the draft regulations have been received by EPA. The preamble, Action memo,
and various briefing memos are in need of revision. When 208(b)(4)(B) regu-
lations are proposed and promulgated, PDS will coordinate development of
guidance explaining how the States can use this program and distinguishing
it from the 404 permit program.
End Product. Dredge and fill regulations proposed and promulgated and
policy guidance.
19
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-A2
Tasks
a. review draft regulations by
existing 404 work group
b. send draft regulations to
steering committee
c. submit for red border review
d. propose dredge and fill regs
e. prepare draft guidance on
implementing the regs
f. incorporate comments/re-
visions to draft guidance
g. issue final regulations
h. issue final guidance on the
dredge and fill regs/policy
Start
0/G
October 21, 1979
November 17, 1979
December 8, 1979
January 1, 1980
February 1, 1980
January 1, 1980
April 1, 1980
Finish
October 12, 1979
November 16, 1979
December 7, 1979
December 21, 1979
January 22, 1980
February 26, 1980
April 1, 1980
May 7, 1980
20
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B1
FIVE YEAR STRATEGY UPDATE
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To develop the FY 81-Baseline WQM Five-Year Strategy.
Method. The intent of the strategy is to show, in a concise statement,
our expectations for the WQM program for the upcoming five years. The
FY 80-Baseline strategy presented a new format for the strategy and is
the most complete statement of overall WQM program policy available.
The FY 81-Baseline strategy will provide more specifics on management
and the problem-orientation of the WQM program. In the time that has
passed since the FY 80 strategy activities have been better defined.
The FY 81 strategy will update the FY 80 strategy in light of these
changes and additional information.
From the management perspective, the funding policy has changed the
most. The Division has issued several policies (see INFO 79-80,
79-100, 79-105 and draft Policy Memorandum A-2) which emphasize limiting
208 funds to nonpoint sources in FY 80 and beyond, and needs-oriented
funding. In addition, the Needs Assessment is progressing and we have
preliminary information on the demands for 106 funds. These changes or
additions to funding policies and data will be incorporated in the
FY 81 Baseline strategy.
We also know more about the priority problems. Significant progress
has been made in the ground water, agriculture and urban storm runoff
problem areas. In these areas prototype projects are selected, activities
identified and timing established. In addition, a draft ground water
strategy and final agriculture strategy are in the field. Discussions
between the Division and Construction Grants Office are continuing on
septic systems and their link to ground water and relationships among
programs in general. This type of detail will be reflected in the FY 81
Baseline strategy, speciifcally in the objective matrices.
End Product. Draft strategy will be completed by November 1 and cir-
culated for comment. The final strategy will be published and mailed
in January 1980.
21
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B1
Tasks
a. review problem-oriented strategies
developed by WPO
b. conduct review/update of discussion
of prototype projects
c. obtain needed and relevant input
from the needs assessment study
d. prepare draft strategy
e. circulate the draft strategy to HQ,
RO for comments
f. prepare final strategy, incorpor-
ating comments received and send
final strategy to printers
g. distribute copies to mailing list
h. gather background data for de-
veloping FY 82 baseline strategy
i. begin preparation of FY 82
baseline strategy
Start Finish
0/6 October 15, 1979
0/G October 15, 1979
0/G October 15, 1979
October 1, 1979 November 1, 1979
November 1, 1979 November 24, 1979
November 16, 1979 December 15, 1979
January 12, 1980 January 19, 1980
June 15, 1980 August 10, 1980
September 1, 1980
0/G
22
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B2
GROUND WATER STRAFEGY
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. This task will develop a ground water strategy for the WQM
program which will provide a framework for: (1) the development of cost
effective solutions to ground water problems through a national technical
transfer program; (2) development of Regional ground water quality manage-
ment strategies and State programs for continuing planning and implementa-
tion activities; (3) funding for ground water prototype projects in FY 80
and beyond; and (4) participation in the overall Agency ground water effort.
Method. The Water Planning Division is developing the strategy with
assistance from the WPD ground water consultants and input from the
Regions. The consultants are drafting the criteria for selecting accept-
able ground water projects, including national prototype projects. They
are also quantifying national priority ground water problems. The ground
water strategy is currently in draft (September, 1979) and is being reviewed
by the Regional offices (deadline for comments - November 9, 1979).
End Product. The development and issuance of a comprehensive ground water
strategy in final form; incorporation of the same in Bl, the WQM Five
Year Strategy.
23
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B2
Tasks
start finish
a. receive comments on draft September 20, 1979 November 9, 1979
b. revise to incorporate comments November 9, 1979 November 20, 1979
c. include list of FY 1980 Category I November 20, 1979
projects
d. finalize ground water strategy November 20, 1979 November 30, 1979
e. printing and distribution November 30, 1979 December 31, 1979
24
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B3
OWWM STRATEGY COORDINATION
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To coordinate with the OWWM offices on policy development.
Method. This activity will be an on-going activity to react to emerging
OWWM policy on a range of subjects. These subjects may include the
following: multi-purpose projects, consolidated priority lists, definition
of enforceable requirements, monitoring, and the 1990 Construction Grants
strategy. These activities cross program lines and input from affected
programs is essential for successful policy development.
In addition, PDS will review draft OWWM strategy statements and other rele-
vant documents and make recommendations for subsequent drafts, interpret OWWM
strategies for their impact on the WQM program, and adapt the WQM strategy
to conform with evolving related strategies.
End Product. Participation in some policy discussions, comments on draft
documents, and recommendations for strategy adjustments.
25
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B3
Tasks Start FinisJi
as requested by OWWH 0/G 0/G
26
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B4
208 COMPLETION OPTIONS
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To assess 208 completion options.
Method. The FY 80 Baseline strategy introduced the "sunset" concept, that
FY 83 would be the last year for 208 funds. Also, the strategy promised
more information on sunset. The Regions, States, and areawide agencies are
interested in the sunset proposal and all its implications.
WPD, with Regional input, will brainstorm about some possibilities, issues,
alternative scenarios, and options for 208 completion. This will serve to
update our strategy and begin to plan our "post-83" program. Ideas include
administratively redesigning EPA water quality programs—106, 208, 205(g)
and 314—into a concerted effort, and including SDWA and RCRA nonpoint
source authorities with WQM into a restructured program.
Information being gathered by the Needs Assessment will be utilized in our
effort to determine future needs. This information will assist us in
developing our fall-back strategy.
PDS will also discuss our "fall-back strategy" of going past FY 83 if we don't
get adequate funding. In FY 80 we did not receive full funding. If this trend
continues when, and how, will we phase out 208 funding? This issue and its
options should be included In the options discussions outlined above.
End Product. Options paper to begin to clear up the issue of 208 completion.
Establish framework for further discussions, refinements. Possible legisla-
tive proposals In FY 82-83. Incorporate initial work in FY 82 Baseline
strategy.
27
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B4
Tasks
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
assemble what we know about
208 completion
brainstorm among HQ staff
develop options paper on 208
completion
discuss with Regional staff
incorporate comments and issue
final options paper with rec-
ommendations
incorporate ideas from options
paper into FY 82 baseline
strategy
Start
April 1, 1980
April 25, 1980
May 5, 1980
June 10, 1980
July 10, 1980
September 1, 1980
Finish
April 20, 1980
May 5, 1980
June 1, 1980
July 1, 1980
August 30, 1980
October 30, 1980
28
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B5
FY 81 EPA ANNUAL AGENCY
GUIDANCE--WQM INPUT
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To interpret WPD and WQM policies and guidance for the annual
EPA Guidance to the Regions and States. Also to attempt to narrow the
gap between the operating guidance and actual operations in the Regions
and States.
Method. The PDS has the lead on the Division's section of the Agency
Guidance. There are two major steps in PDS development of the guidance:
(1) development of a policy summary and narrative explanations, and (2)
identification of expected outputs. The PDS role is to develop and
organize WPD's narrative input into the guidance, coordinate this input
with the Operations and Implementation Branches, provide this to the
Office of Analysis and Evaluation, and assist them in other related
activities as appropriate. As the guidance continues to be developed,
WPD will perform follow-up and review functions. A WPD representative
is participating in Agency-wide review of the content of and procedures
for the agency guidance; PDS will coordinate with SEA section.
End Product. Development of overall policy statements for use in
preparing FY 81 Agency Guidance. Other outputs as-assigned.
29
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-B5
Tasks Start Finish
a. assist with President's Budget November 30, 1979 December 22, 1979
Submission and Regional Guidance
b. assist with development of work January 20, 1980 February 20, 1980
load indicators
c. develop WQM portion of draft February 5, 1980 March 2, 1980
agency guidance for FY 81/82
d. respond to State comments as March 5, 1980 March 26,,1980
necessary
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C1
106 POLICY AND GUIDANCE
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To coordinate the establishment of a Headquarter's role in
the management of section 106 grants to States. This job refers to
management policies of section 106, not funding formulas for 106. This
initiative involves coordinating involved Headquarter's offices to (1)
establish a management system in Headquarters (2) gather available
information, especially from the Meeds Assessment, and (3) act as a
catalyst for developing and publishing, as necessary, guidance for Regional
Offices regarding the use of 106 funds and management systems.
Method. This job will require close coordination not only with
offices and the Regions but also Grants Administration Division, the
Office of Audit, Permits and Enforcement, and the Office of General
Counsel. WPD will provide coodination through the PDS and Evaluation
Section. The methodology for encouraging development of Section 106
guidance will consist of five tasks: (1) coordinating the establishment
of committees, both internal and external, to help in the policy develop-
ment, (2) working with PES on fact finding/problem assessment through
the Needs Assessment, (3) keeping up-to-date with the progress of consoli-
dated grants legislation and its potential impact on 106, (4) working with
the affected Headquarters Offices to identify policy options, and (5)
selection of optimal policy. This task is important since many aspects
of the integrated WQM planning process are paid for primarily with section
106 funds. Therefore, the policy EPA adopts as a result of this task will
impact State WQM programs directly.
End product. The incorporation of language for 106 in the FY 82 Baseline
WQM Five Year Strategy and the publication of a policy memorandum for
106 funding and management systems as part of the WQM Supplemental
Guidance package for FY 82.
31
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C1
Tasks
a. establish external and internal
committees
b. gather available info from Needs
Assessment findings
c. attend committee meetings to discuss
options paper
d. develop 1st options paper
e. assimilate comments
f. develop second options paper (with
committee participation)
g. hold AA briefing
h. begin to draft language for FY 82 Baseline
Strategy, include committee's input
i. finalize 106 language in 82 Baseline
Strategy
j. address 106 through FY 82 Supplemental
WQM Guidance
Start
October 20, 1979
December 10, 1979
January 13, 1980
January 26, 1980
February 20, 1980
March 15, 1980
May 5, 1980
June 1, 1980
September 7, 1980
November 8, 1980
Finisji
November 15, 1979
January 6, 1980
January 26, 1980
February 4, 1980
March 10, 1980
April 10, 1980
June 23, 1980
November 1, 1980
March 1, 1980
32
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C2
WQM POLICY MEMO DEVELOPMENT
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To issue additional policy memoranda to assist the Regions in
carrying out the WQM process in FY 80.
Method. WPD issued Supplemental WQM Program Guidance for FY 80 in September;
1979. This guidance package presented a new format and deleted outdated
policy memos. At least three additional policy memos will be developed
in the first quarter of FY 80.
a. Quality/Quantity and Related Issues
The purpose of this policy is to make planning agencies aware of
opportunities for improving water quality through involvement in
water quantity issues. WPD will implement recommendations on
water conservation from the Report of Water Policy Implementation
Task Force 11, and the draft 102(d) and 516(e)/1442(c) studies.
The final memo will incorporate Regional and interested publics'
comments.
b. Plan Update
The purpose of this policy is to clarify EPA policy on require-
ments for updates of certified and approved WQM plans. Consis-
tent with our funding policy routine plan updates are generally
discouraged. A draft of this policy is complete (September 24,
1979) and will be circulated for Regional and other input.
c. Open Space/Recreation
Open space and recreation is a high priority of the Administra-
tion and Congress. The purpose of this policy is to provide
guidance for the use of State and areawide water quality manage-
ment agencies in complying with requirements for the identifi-
cation and analysis of open space and public outdoor recreational
opportunities. Where a recreation agency has developed recreation
plans, 208 agencies may participate in implementing related
water quality controls, if funds are available.
End Product. Development of at least three policy memorandas, with Regional
input. FTnalized" and sent to the participants in the WQM process.
33
-------
Tasks
JOB NO 80-PDS-C2
start
finish
a. Quality/Quantity
i. reviewing draft reports
ii. issue report on recommenda-
tions
iii. draft
iv. comments, circulate
v. final
0/G October 10, 1979
October 10, 1979 October 24, 1979
October 25, 1979 November 1, 1979
November 1, 1979 November 24, 1979
November 28, 1979 December 31, 1979
b. Plan Update
i. finalize a draft guidance
.memo for distribution to the
Regions
ii. review and incorporate
Regional comments
iii. obtain DAA approval, finalize,
distribute
September 30, 1979 October 5, 1979
October 29, 1979 November 2, 1979
November 18, 1979 December 1, 1979
c. Open Space/Recreation
i. finalize a draft guidance
memo for distribution to the
Regions
ii. review and incorporate
Regional comments
iii. issue final guidance memo
September 30, 1979 October 16, 1979
October 16, 1979 November 15, 1979
November 20, 1979 December 10, 1979
34
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C3
FY 81 WQM SUPPLEMENTAL
GUIDANCE PACKAGE
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To publish timely, complete, and well-written Supplemental
WQM Program Guidance for FY 81 by April 1.
Method. In September the Division issued the FY 80 Supplemental WQM
Program Guidance. Throughout this next year we will update the guidance
package. Updating will involve developing new policy memoranda? (see C2),
deleting any outdated memos, correcting existing memos, correcting the
text concerning the management and problem-solving discussions, and
adding new management discussions. In addition, the management discussion
may be refined. The Division has a consultant working on evaluation of
Regional management. Region III is the trial Region for developing and
testing Regional management procedures. Findings from this trail will be
incorporated into the management discussion.
End Product. Publication of Supplemental WQM Guidance for FY 81 by April 1
35
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C3
Tasks
a. review FY 80 guidance package-
make any necessary coorections, de-
letions, or additions
b. adjust Mgmt. Framework as necessary
re: Reg III findings
c. issue draft update
d. incorporate comments/revisions
e. issue in final
f. signature on- final
g. printing and mailing
Start
Finish
December 1, 1979 January 12, 1980
January 1, 1980
January 15, 1980
January 20, 1980
February 20, 1980
March 1, 1980
March 1, 1980
January 13, 1980
March 1, 1980
March 10, 1980
April 1, 1980
36
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C4
WORK PROGRAM AND STATE
STRATEGY GUIDANCE
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To investigate requirements for and results of State and areawide
WQM work programs. Analyze demands upon States and areawides and determine
if, and how, the work program process can be simplified. Issue work program
guidance. Review draft State strategy guidance, incorporate any neccessary
changes and issue final guidance.
Method. Analyzing the work program and strategy development process
will require several activities. First, PDS will work with the SEA
and FMS section to determine the present status of work programs.
The SEA section has been reviewing work programs in its SEA assessment.
PDS staff will work with them to identify weak areas and to find 2-3
good examples of work programs, and distribute these examples to the
Regions. Second, PDS will conduct an analysis of the annual process
facing the States. We will examine the many demands placed on them and
determine opportunities for potential streamlining. Third, PDS will conduct
discussions with Audit on the coordination of aui't requirements and reflect
this in our work program guidance. Fourth, draft State strategy guidance
was published in FY 79. PDS will closely review this guidance in light
of current policies. Changes will be incorporated and the policy issued
in final.
End Product. (1) A guidance package on work programs which will include
both narrative and examples. (2) A systems analysis of the annual process
required of the Regions and States, with recommendations. (3) Final
State strategy guidance.
-------
Tasks
JOB NO 80-PDS-C4
start
finish
a. work with SEA, FMS section,
det weak areas, 2-3 "good"
work programs
b. arrange discussions with Audit
c. distribute 2-3 good examples
of work programs to Regions
d. conduct systems analysis
i. examine demands on RO,
States from all sources
e. review draft State strategy
guidance, incorporate changes
f.-4 prepare draft guidance package on
work program process, circulate
g. incorporate comments on work
program guidance
h. issue final State strategy
guidance
i. issue final guidance package on
work programs
January 3, 1980 January 19, 1980
January 10, 1980 January 25, 1980
January 20, 1980
January 21, 1980 February 14, 1980
January 26, 1980 February 21, 1980
February 14, 1980 March 2, 1980
March 2, 1980
March 2, 1980
April 1, 1980
April 1, 1980
April 3, 1980
April 20, 1980
38
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C5
313 FOLLOW-UP
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To facilitate implementation of WQM plans with respect to control of NPS
pollutants on Federal lands.
Method. Some background research has already been completed in FY 79. The
next step is to coordinate with the Evaluation Section in assessing the
current status of WQM planning and implementation on Federal lands. This
will involve gathering information from the Implementation Branch and the
Regional Offices as well as examining plans covering substantial areas of
Federal lands. The assessment shall consider the factors contributing to
both successful and unsuccessful implementation efforts. Suggestions will
be solicited on the role EPA should play in helping the States and Federal
land management agencies work together effectively.
Upon completion of the problem assessment, the PDS staff will propose
options for a Headquarters response and, if appropriate, develop a policy
memorandum.
End Product. A determination by WPD of the action necessary to improve
WQM planning and implementation efforts on Federal lands. May include de-
velopment of a policy memo to incorporate in the Supplemental WQM Program
Guidance for FY 82.
39
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-C5
Tas ks
a. conduct discussions with HQ and RO
staff
b. propose options, based on discussions,
input
c. draft PM, if appropriate
d. circulate, comments, revisions
e. issue final
Start
June 1, 1980
July 1, 1980
Finish
June 25, 1980
July 10, 1980
July 10, 1980 July 24, 1980
July 24, 1980 August 18, 1980
August 18, 1980 September 10, 1980
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D1
REAUTHORIZATION OF 208
AND 106
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. The authorization for 208 and 106 grant funds ends in FY 80. A re-
authorization is necessary to make funding possible through FY 84 and to
promote program stability.
Method. Reauthorization of the 208 and 106 program will require several
activities, both internal and external to EPA. First, PDS staff must prepare
draft legislative language to amend 208(f)(3) and 208(j) and 106(a). This
language must be approved by the AA, Office of Water and Waste Management.
Second, staff will prepare testimony to support reauthorization. Third,
PDS staff will prepare testimony to support reauthorization. Fourth,
final legislative language will be developed with the concurrence of EPA
management and the Hill. EPA will testify at Congressional hearings on
the reauthorization.
End Product. A reauthorization of 208 and 106 funds through FY 84.
41
-------
Tasks
JOB NO 80-PDS-D1
start
finish
a. prepare draft legislative language
b. work with Congressional committees
on reauthorization
c. prepare testimony to support
reauthorization
d. develop final legislative language
e. Congressional hearing
January 14, 1980 January 24, 1980
0/6 0/6
February 1, 1980 February 21, 1980
February 21, 1980 March 17, 1980
April 3, 1980
42
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D2
GROUND WATER PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To track the prototype projects to provide technical, institutional
and fiscal guidance as required, to keep abreast of activities, and to
examine and evaluate results.
Method. At Regional and State request WPD and the ground water consultants
will track prototype projects throughout the course of the project. Consul-
tants can assist in the development/refinement of project work plans, parti-
cipate in key project meetings with State and Regional staff, review/comments
on draft work products and develop project reports to be transferable to
other areas with similar ground water problems. Following initial project
meetings, communications will be by conference call and in writing, when
possible, to minimize travel costs.
End Product. Management of ground water prototype projects through such
activities as mid-course corrections, work program development, periodic
status reports, and coordination/1iasion/tech transfer.
43
-------
Tasks.
JOB NO 80-PDS-D2
a. review proposals
b. select proposals
start
0/G
finish
October 26, 1979
October 31, 1979
c. participate in development
and review of work programs
d. track milestones
e. mid-year revisions to work
program
f. visit sites
g. coordinate consultant consortia
and project team
0/6
0/G
March 17, 1980
0/G
0/G
December, 1979
0/G
April 25, 1980
0/G
0/G
44
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D3
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To determine what areas of the WPD's work can be augmented by
the Office of Research and Development.
Method. (1) Assess projects we are currently working on. (2) Are there gaps
or study limitations which prevent us from going further with a study? (3)
Assimilate a list of perceived needs or gaps; coordinate with the Implemen-
tation Branch and Walt Rittall, our representative on the Headquarters Re-
search and Development Task Force, and (4) Coordinate our list of needs with
other lists within WPD, particularly with PES and Operations Branch.
End Product. Identification of needs; areas where we feel further research
would be beneficial.
45
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D3
RED
Tasks
a. assess projects/gaps
b. assemble list of needs
c. coordinate with WPD
Start
February 1, 1980
February 16, 1980
February 25, 1980
Finish
February 16, 1980
February 25, 1980
March 1, 1980
46
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D4
PARTICIPATION IN SECTIONS
316 and 176(c) (CAA) WORK
GROUPS
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To insure that the policies and regulations developed to implement
two sections of the Clean Air Act (176(c) and 316) are compatible with WQM
program objectives.
Method. A member of the PDS staff will attend work group meetings and comment
on drafts of policies and regulations as they are developed. Section 176(c)
covers determinations of conformity of Federal actions (including of a plan) to
each State air quality implementation plan (SIP) developed in response to re-
quirements of the Clean Air Act. Section 316 allows the Administrator to
condition, restrict, or withhold construction grants in areas where SIPs are
inadequate, have not been submitted, or are not being implemented. WQM is
affected by each of these sections to the extent that 208 plans contain
population projections and other facility-related elements.
End Product. Policies and regulations developed under Sections 176(c) and 316
of the Clean Air Act that are consistent with WQM program objectives.
47
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D4
Tasks
Section 316
i. comment of draft final interim
policy
ii. participate on work group de-
veloping revisions to const.
grants regulations imp!em.
section 316
Section 716(c)
i. comment on ANPRM
ii. work group meeting
iii. comment on draft proposal
regulations
iv. work group meeting
v. work group meeting
vi. comment on draft final
regulations
Start
October 5, 1979
November, 1979
October 1, 1979
January 16, 1980
July 1, 1980
Finish
October 12, 1979
September, 1980
October 5, 1979
January 7, 1980
January 30, 1980
June 16, 1980
July 14, 1980
July 31, 1980
48
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS- D5
WATER QUALITY/WATER
QUANTITY COORDINATION
STUDY
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To complete a report to Congress analyzing the relationships
between water quality programs and State and Federal water allocation
programs, pursuant to Section 102(d) of the Clean Water Act.
Method. The second draft of the Water Quality/Water Quantity Report was
distributed for review/comment in August and September. Comments are due
by November 16, 1979. Comments will be incorporated into the report in
November and December. Revised recommendations will be reviewed by the
Assistant Administrator, OWWM, and reviewed by the State Task Force. Fol-
lowing Red Border Review, the Administrator will transmit the final report
to Congress.
End Product. The final Water Quality/Water Allocation Report to Congress
including recommendations to solve identified problems and to improve
quali ty/quanti ty coordfnati on.
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D5
WATER QUALITY/WATER
QUANTITY COORDINATION
STUDY
Tasks
a. review and synthesize comments
b. revise chapters and recommendations
per comments including editing;
draft executive summary
c. Assistant Administrator review
revised recommendations and
outstanding policy issues
d. Discuss (conference call)
revised recommendations with
State Task Force
e. Commence Steering Committee
Review
f. comments incorporated; Red Border
Review
g. OMB Review
h. printing
i. Report Delivered
start
finish
November 1, 1979 December 7, 1979
December 1, 1979 January 18, 1980
December 19, 1979 December 31, 1979
January 10, 1980
January 21, 1980 - January 31, 1980
February 8, 1980 February 27, 1980
February 27, 1980 March 12, 1980
March 14, 1980 April 25, 1980
April 30, 1980
-------
JOB NO 30-PDS-D6
CONTINGENCIES AND ADMINISTRATION
JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose. To take care of administrative tasks and contingencies as necessary
to anticipate issues and problems; to maintain informed, cordial relationships
and Regional contacts.
Method. This work plan will set aside time and resources to handle PDS admin-
istrative tasks, for example, the Section and Branch ZBB duties. Each member
of the Section will be assigned Regions to be familiar with throughout the year;
this person would be responsible for most Section contacts with the Region,
would handle correspondence pertaining to the Region, and prepare briefings
of trip materials for the Region as appropriate.
End Product. Section ZBB and other administrative documents; briefings;
correspondence.
51
-------
JOB NO 80-PDS-D6
Tasks
a. prepare PDS ZBB materials assigned
for FY 81/82
b. prepare PDS work plan for FY 81/82
c. assign PDS staff contacts for each
Region
d. prepare briefings, notes, answer
correspondence for Regions assigned;
attend occassional meetings of
interest to Region
e, conduct personnel evaluations
f. prepare personnel evaluations
criteria
g. PDS status reports
h. handle correspondence to the Hill,
OMB, 208, agencies, etc. on policy
matters .
Start
March 1, 1980
Finish
April 1, 1980
August 15, 1980 November 1, 1980
October 1, 1979
0/G
0/G
April 1, 1980 April 30, 1980
September 1, 1980 September 30, 1980
January 5, 1980
April 5, 1980
July 5, 1980
0/G
0/G
5 2
-------
WORK PLAN
POLICY COORDINATION/SEA SECTION
POLICY AND EVALUATION BRANCH
WATER PLANNING DIVISION
FY 1980
53
-------
WORK PLAN: POLICY COORDINATION/SEA SECTION
I. Introduction
The State/EPA Agreement (SEA) process, implemented by EPA in FY 1979, is
beginning to take hold and expand in scope.
For Fiscal Year 1979, EPA encouraged its Regions and the States to develop
SEAs covering programs under the Clean Water Act. »Thirty-two States and Territories
successfully negotiated and signed Agreements. Most of these covered Clean Water
Act programs only and reflected the traditional emphasis on individual programs
and existing grant processes. However, in a few cases environmental issues that
cut across program categories were identified.
In Fiscal Year 1980 the Agreements became mandatory. The States and Regions
are now required to go beyond the Clean Water Act (CWA) to cover programs under
the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), which regulates the disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. In
addition, many Agreements will also cover air quality priorities. It appears
that the FY 80 Agreements will move closer to true integration, but it is still
expected that the overall emphasis will remain programmatic rather than problem-
specific.
In FY 1981, it is anticipated that all EPA programs will be covered in the
process (e.g., air, noise, radiation, toxics, pesticides).
The SEA is a mechanism designed to streamline and integrate the management
of environmental programs. Its ultimate goals are to:
Ensure that the large sums of Federal money going to the
States produce tangible results in solving priority environ-
mental problems; and
Realign available resources to identify and solve the problems
that separate programs cannot handle alone.
The State/EPA Agreement is meant to be an important decision document,
identifying high-priority environmental issues that the States and EPA agree
must be addressed. It is also intended to be a management tool, focusing attention
toward solving identified problems. It is also an information document useful
to EPA, State and local governments, areawide agencies, and the public. It
is expected that the SEA will help simplify Federal guidance and regulations,
eliminate duplication of effort, and reduce the paperwork associated with environ-
mental programs.
On balance the SEA process has gotten off to a respectable start at both
the Regional and State levels. The SEA is definitely being used as a management tool
and a communication tool to solve environmental problems, and some Regions and
States are successfully converting to an integrated approach.
54
-------
-2-
This is a critical time for the process and much work needs to be done by
the States and EPA if the Agreements are to work. A strong commitment is needed
on the part of both the States and EPA. In addition, tasks specified in the
Agreement must be carefully tracked and evaluated to assure that they are carried
out. The tasks below are geared toward making the SEA process a successful and
worthwhile endeavor.
II. Primary Work Tasks
The primary work tasks of the Policy Coordination/SEA Section will be
as follows:
1. Development of Guidance for FY 81 State/EPA Agreements and other
guidance to assist in development of State/EPA Agreements.
2. Responsibility for coordinating HQ-Regional Tracking System to keep
HQ and the Regions informed on the status of the SEAs. Tracking system will
consist of periodic phone calls to the Regions, follow-up reports and an Annual
Regional Assessment.
3. Coordination of information exchange activities among HQ and the
Regions which includes semi-annual coordinators' meetings, review and comment
on SEAs, and exchange of information on successful techniques developed by
individual Regions and States.
4. Coordination of Regional liaison activities within the Water Planning
Division and coordination of regional briefing materials for the Assistant Admini-
strator's office.
5. Review of related EPA and other Federal agency program guidance,
memoranda of understanding and regulations to determine consistency with the
water quality management program.
III. Job Description
Following are the individual job descriptions for each task.
55
-------
JOB NO. 80-SEA-A1
JOB DESCRIPTION: Development of FY 81 State/EPA Agreement Guidance
PURPOSE
To provide Regions and States with guidance to assist in the development
of effective State/EPA Agreements.
METHOD
This task will be accomplished based on input from the Regions, States,
substate entities, other EPA offices and the general public. Information from
the HQ-Regional tracking system and the annual summary will be utilized.
END PRODUCT
FY 81 SEA Guidance.
WORK ITEMS
1. Develop outline of guidance and obtain HQ and Regional comments.
October 1979
2. Obtain decision on inclusion of air programs and other media programs
(outside of OWWM). November 15. 1979
3. Complete draft Guidance including: Policy Statement, Case Studies and
Program Criteria. December 15, 1979
4. Comment period on Guidance. December 15, 1979 - January 15, 1980
5. Finalize FY 81 Guidance. January 30, 1980
56
-------
JOB NO. 80-SEA-A2
JOB DESCRIPTION: Development of Additional Guidance related to SEA Process
PURPOSE
To provide Regions and States with additional specific details that
should assist them in the development of State/EPA Agreements.
METHOD
Additional guidance will be generated on the basis of need and will be
developed in conjunction with pertinent HQ program offices.
END PRODUCT
Guidance.
WORK ITEMS
1. Work with Policy Section in WPD to develop clarification of the relation-
ship of the WQM funding policy to the SEA process. November - December 1979
2. Work with the Office of Planning and Management to develop guidance on
grants management and streamlined paperwork requirements for the SEA. February -
April 1980
3. Based on FY 80 experiences, develop further guidance and techniques for
public participation and the role of planning and implementing agencies and State
Igislators. February - April 1980
57
-------
JOB NO- 80-SEA-A3
JOB DESCRIPTION: Tracking/Evaluation System
PURPOSE
To keep HQ and the Regions informed of the status of the development and
implementation of the SEA process and to track and evaluate the outputs and
commitments specified in the Agreements. This system should also identify
where changes and improvements are needed in the SEA Guidance.
METHOD
This task will basically be accomplished though bi-monthly phone calls to
the Regional SEA contacts; follow-up status reports; the Annual SEA Assessment;
and the development and implementation of an evaluation system (with the Office
of Planning and Management as lead).
END PRODUCT
Bi-monthly status reports for distribution to HQ and the Regions; and
Annual SEA Assessment Report summarizing problems, progress, results and successes
in the development and implementation of the SEA process.
WORK ITEMS
1. Conduct bi-monthly phone calls to the Regional SEA Coordinators.
2. Prepare and distribute of status report to HQ and Regional contacts.
3. Work with Regional WQM Coordinators to ensure inclusion of WQM priorities
in the FY 81 SEAs to the maximum extent feasible. Begin February 1980
4. Work with Division Director, WPD, to include SEA requirements in the
Regional management evaluation criteria. November - December 1979
5. Develop SEA Tracking/Evaluation mechanism for Regional use. February -
April 1980
6. Assist the Office of Planning and Management in the development of
program evaluation methodology for SEAs. February - April 1980
7. Coordinate development of OWWM program evaluation criteria to fit
into the 0PM evaluation system. May - June 1980
8. Participate in selecting and training HQ teams to conduct Regional SEA
assessment/evaluation. July 1980
9. Participate in conducting Regional SEA assessment/evaluation and preparing
Annual Assessment Report. August - September 1980
58
-------
JOB NO 80-SEA-A4
JOB DESCRIPTION: Coordination of Information Exchange Activities
PURPOSE
To provide Regions and States with procedures and approaches shown to
be innovative and successful in integrating the various programs for the SEA
and to assist the States and Regions in developing SEAs.
END PRODUCT
Improved State/EPA Agreements through exchange of information.
WORK ITEMS
1. Conduct SEA Coordinators' Meetings. October 1979 and April 1980
2. Develop criteria for review of FY 80 SEAs. October 1979
3. Coordinate review of FY 80 SEAs within OWVIM and provide comments to
the Regions. This is a priority activity and will require extensive resource
commitments within OWWM since all of the Agreements are scheduled to come into
Headquarters in October and November. Initially the HQ Review Team will review
one Agreement per Region so that there will be immediate feedback (by end of
January) to assist Regions in developing FY 81 Agreements. Remainder of
Agreements will then be reviewed. November 1979 - May1980
4. Review FY 80 Agreements for WQM outputs and prepare analytical feedback
for WQM Coordinators. This is a priority activity and will require extensive
resource commitments within the Water Planning Division since all of the Agreements
are scheduled to come into Headquarters in October and November. Initially, one
Agreement per Region will be reviewed to provide immediate feedback to WQM
Coordinators (by end of January). November 1979 - May 1980
5. Periodically distribute innovative and successful SEA approaches.
6. Explore, with the Regions,-workshop needs for information exchange
purposes and set up workshops on an as needed basis. February - June 1980
-------
JOB NO. 80-SEA-A5
JOB DESCRIPTION: Regional Coordination
PURPOSE
A. To coordinate and facilitate Headquarters-Regional liaison activities being
conducted by each of the WPD Branches to keep firm management control of the WQM
program and to assist in preparing for Regional visits and briefings. Also to
assure that policy directives have Regional input and that the Regions are kept
up-to-date on decisions pertaining to the WQM program.
B. To coordinate regional briefing materials within the Office of Water
and Waste Management for the use of the Assistant Administrator.
METHOD
The Policy Coordination/SEA Section will be responsible for coordinating with
the Regional contacts designated by the Branch Chiefs on a Region-by-Region basis
and preparing reports on Regional activities as the need arises.
END PRODUCT
Regional liaison and periodic reports on Regional activities, problems, and
progress.
WORK ITEMS
Al. As need arises, meet with designated Regional contacts within the Division
to obtain status on Regional activities, etc.
A2. Prepare report for Division Director, as needed.
Bl. Develop format for regional briefing books and distribute to Deputy
Assistant Administrators within OWWM.
B2. Notify DAAs prior to each regional visit of AA and coordinate preparation
of material for briefing book.
B3. Prepare WPD input for AA's meetings with the Regional Administrators in
residence on an as needed basis.
-------
JOB NO. 80-SEA-A6
JOB DESCRIPTION: |8)jlf(OfaEflftJed EPA and other Federal Agency Guidance
PURPOSE
To assure consistency with the water quality management program.
METHOD
This task will basically be accomplished by reviewing related program
regulations and guidance of other EPA programs and other Federal Agency programs
and providing input into those regulations and guidance packages, as necessary.
END PRODUCT
Agency liaison and coordination.
WORK ITEMS
1. Review of pertinent EPA regulations and guidance. ONGOING
2. Review of pertinent regulations and guidelines of other Federal
agencies. ONGOING
61
-------
C4
ce
BRANCH: POLICY ANO EVALUATION BRANCH HOUR SUIUUICI UIAGUAH AND HISUUHCC 1'I.AH
SECTION: Policy Coordinatlon/SEA Section ' paijo 1 of
task
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
,100 HO. AND NAME
description
80-SEA-A1 FY 81 SEA GUIDANCE
"Inallze outline of Guidance
YEAR 19
o^t nov dec
—
)bta1n decision on Inclu- 1^^^^^^^^^^
slon of Air Programs. UHMMMHH
;ofnplete draft Guidance
Including:
° Policy Statement .
0 Case Studies
0 Program Criteria
Gunmen t Period on Guidance
Finalize FY 81 Guidance
80-SEA-A2 ADDITIONAL GUIDANC
Relationship between WQM
Funding Policy and SEA.
Grants Management/Stream-
lined Paperwork Requirements
Public Participation Tech-
niques; role of Regional
planning and Implementing
jgencles and State legis-
lators
80-SEA-A3 TRACKING/EVALUATIO
Bi-monthly phone calls.
Distribute bi-monthly status
report to Reglonal/HQ Con-
tarfi
m—
A
A
Hi
••
TEAR _^
Jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug srp
•i
-
A
A
•
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
J
level of
effort
(p-m's)
-------
BRANCH: POLICY AND EVALUATION BRANCH WOIMC SU|ULIICt UIACIIAH AMD KCSUUIICE I'l.AH
SECT ION:pol Icy Coordlnatlon/SEA Section " Pa'lc 2 "f
JOB MO. AIID NAME
task description
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
~
Work with Regional WQM
Coordinators to assure
Inclusion of WQM outputs
In SEAs.
Work with Division Director,
HPD, to Include SEA require-
ments In the Regional manage
ment evaluation criteria.
Develop SEA Tracking/Evalu-
ation mechanism for Regional
use.
of program evaluation
methodology for SEAs.
Coordinate development of
OWWM program evaluation
criteria.
Participate In selecting
and training HQ teams to
conduct Regional SEA Assess-
ment/Evaluation
Participate In conducting
Regional SEA Assessment/
Evaluation and preparing
Annual Report.
— , —
YEAR 79
oqt
nov
dec
-\.
YIAR 80
4an fcb mar apr may Jun Jtil auy s«p
A
A
A
••••*
A
^^^1
1
•BOM
•man
i
level of
effort
(p -m's)
-------
BRANCH: POLICY AND EVALUATION BRANCH HOKK Sl(|UlHCl UIAGHAH AND ItlSOUHCE 'LAN
SECTION: Policy Coordlnation/SEA Section ' I>«HI
JOB NO. AHD NAME
task description
1.
2.
3.
4.
5-
6.
1.
2.
0-SEA-A4 COORDINATION OF
NFORMATION EXCHANGE ACT1-
ITIES
induct SEA Coordinators'
eetings.
evelop review criteria for
Y 80 SEAs.
Coordinate review of FY 80
EAs within OWWM and provide
onments to the Regions.
ieview FY 80 Agreements for
QM outputs and prepare
nalytical feedback for WQH
Coordinators.
'eriodically distribute 1n-
lovative and successful SEA
ipproaches.
Ixplore with the Regions
workshop needs for Informa-
tion exchange and set up worl
ihops on an as needed basis.
JO-SEA-A5 REGIONAL COOROIH-
\TION
•IPO Reports as needed.
tegional briefing materials
YEAR 79
0<)t
A
••••
nov
H"
• U^jni
A
dec
:1al Feedt
o 3 of 4
YEAR 80
Jan fob mar apr
ack — *-
.
.in.
1al Feedback — +\
__
A
I I I
\
A
™~
.^
A
may jun
|
• A
A
Jul amj si-p
A
neakssHTOffw
A
j^^lg^j^E
love) of
effort
(p-m's)
-------
BRANCH: POLICY AND EVALUATION BRANCH WOIIK SHJUlMCt U1ACIIAH AHU HCSOUHCE 1'I.AH
SECTION: Policy Coordlnatlon/SEA Section ' (iai|(
.100 NO. Arm fiAnc
task dcscrl|illon
1.
80-SEA-A6 RELATED EPA AND
OTHER FEOERArSGENCTGUF~
DUNCE Mu RIGlOtlONS
Review and Coordination.
. ., ... ' — ——
TEAR 79
o(|t nov dec
mm
~\
4 of 4
1 '
YEAR 80
Jan fcb mar apr may Jun Jul nucj sc|i
-,
level of
effort
(p-m's)
-------
Agricultural NPS Program
FY 80
Introduction
An aggressive nonpoint source (NPS) pollution control program is required if
the legislatively mandated water quality goals are to be met. Since agricul-
tural activities have been identified as major contributors to nonpoint source
pollution, EPA has given a high priority to the development and implementation
of agricultural nonpoint source control programs.
Agricultural nonpoint source pollutant problems are pervasive. (Many States-
have identified their agricultural NPS related water quality problems and
developed implementation programs.) Reasonable solutions to many of the agri-
cultural problems are known and many of the institutional mechanisms are in
place. However, there is general agreement that while implementation programs
move ahead, there is the need to develop a more comprehensive evaluation of
the impact of agricultural nonpoint source pollutants on water quality; the
degree of control required to meet water quality goals; and, the effectiveness
of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in reducing pollutant loadings and meeting
water quality goals. Since water quality management resources in EPA are limited,
it is not feasible to fund each State to look at every agricultural nonpoint
source water quality problem. A strategy has been developed to focus resources
on solving the most significant problems in those areas where water quality has
or will be most adversely affected. Information and data from these projects
will be widely disseminated to other States with similar problems.
NPS projects of the Office of Research and Development (ORD) are an integral
part of the NPS program. The NPS strategy recognizes the supportive role of
the ORD projects in implementation of the strategy.
The agricultural strategy builds on the framework developed in the Water
Planning Division's Water Quality Management Strategy. It is consistent
with the Work Load Analysis (WLA) developed for the Zero-Based Budget process
for both the FY 80 and 81 budgets. The increasing emphasis on program imple-
mentation described in the strategy is consistent with the FY 80 and 81 bud-
get decisions. The attention to implementation will require that additional
Agency resources are devoted to this area. However, since the need for personnel
in the planning phase will decrease, no additional resources will be required
in the water quality management program.
The agricultural NPS Strategy is the framework for: 1) defining national
agriculture NPS policy; 2) developing Regional agriculture NPS strategies
and State programs for continuing agricultural NPS planning and implemention
activities; 3) funding FY-1980 agriculture NPS program elements; 4) determining
the need for new Federal legislative initiatives or changes needed in existing
legislation and 5) recommending required legislative action.
ere applicable, State definition also includes areawide agencies.
66
-------
OBJECTIVE 1
Complete the development of State agricultural NFS plans:
• Identify and prioritize areas with critical agricultural NFS water
quality problems.
• Select BMPs appropriate for the pollutant problems.
• Designate management agencies with adequate authorities and
capabilities.
• Develop operational programs.
National Policy Direction
Continued Section 208 funding for the development of agriculture NPS programs
will be limited to States that have identified agricultural activities as
significantly contributing to the State's water quality problems. Planning
funds may be made available in those States where EPA has determined that the
agriculture plan elements in the initial plan were inadequate. Normally,
agricultural portions of 208 plans determined by EPA to be adequate will not
receive further funding. Where warranted, further funding must be commensurate
with an established need for additional water quality problem identification
and solutions and for further designations or changes in area priorities. In
addition the responsible planning and designated management agencies must clearly
demonstrate an interest in implementing the NPS control program before further
funding is provided. Agricultural NPS elements are considered adequate if
agricultural NPS problems are identified, critical areas and sources prioritized,
BMPs identified in sufficient detail to select implementation projects, manage-
ment agencies have been designated and the required operational program is
underway. No funds shall be provided in those States where agricultural
activities do not presently contribute or will not contribute to water quality
problems.
Problem identification has not been completed in a number of States. Sediment
was identified as a pollutant in many of the initial plans, but other potential
pollutants (i.e. pesticides, nutrients, etc.) may not have been addressed. In
States where preliminary data indicates a strong probability that pollutants
other than sediment contribute to water quality problems funding priority
shall be given to address those pollutants.
Continuing planning process (CPP) funding may also be required to complete
other program elements, such as the development of State funding for the
operational programs of designated management agencies, for administrative or
legislative actions required to accelerate implementation, and for CPP regulatory
program development. CPP activities which address regulatory programs shall
be given priority.
67
-------
Funding of agricultural NPS work elements that involve cause/effect analyses
and the evaluation of the effectiveness of BMP systems will generally be
limited to projects selected under the comprehensive monitoring and evaluation
program objective.
Pi scussion
Identification and Prioritization of Critical Areas or Sources
Most States identified agricultural NPS pollutants as a significant water
quality problem in their initial 208 plans. A variety of planning techniques
were used to identify those problems, ranging from sophisticated land use
models to field examination. In many States the information developed was
sufficient to identify the critical problem areas. Since implementation will
focus on those priority problem areas and available resources will limit the
number of areas which can be addressed, the use of funds for further problem
identification studies will have a very low priority. States have designated
priority areas as a result of RCWP requirements (many States used FY 79 funds),
therefore, no FY 80 funds will be utilized for this purpose. Since implementa-
tion resources are only sufficient to initiate control programs in a few of the
highest priority problem areas, the development of priority listings for every
area in the State is not necessary at this time.
BMPs
BMP identification was required in initial plan development. While these plans
addressed BMPs, in many cases the BMPs were limited to standard soil and water
conservation practices. As the impact of many of these practices on water
quality is not clearly understood, evaluation of BMP effectiveness is still
required and will be funded in selected priority problem areas where accelerated
BMP implementation is underway.
The largest gap in selection, testing and evaluation of BMPs regards pollutants
other than sediment. The CPP can be utilized to obtain this information. Exam-
ples include the use of Cooperative Extension Service personnel in addressing
pesticide, nutrient, animal wastes, etc; the funding of planning activities in
such critical problem areas; and the funding of programs to transfer techniques
to other applicable areas.
The initial planning process resulted in the development of numerous BMP Hand-
books and substantial amounts of informational material such as brochures, slide
shows, movies, etc. FY 80 funds will not be used to produce similar material
which would duplicate what has been produced previously. Funding material of
this type will be limited to innovative approaches for which Handbooks, and
other informational or educational material have not been developed.
Management Agencies
There will be few cases that justify funding of activities related to management
agencies. Designation of management agencies was completed in the initial
plans. Where required, detailed management agency agreements have been funded
with FY 78/79 funds. Where management agencies accepted their designation
68
-------
it was in full recognition of their obligations and they should be prepared to
fulfil their responsibilities. This does not mean that management agencies
can not be utilized to carry out specific planning functions. Planning
activities related to management agencies, such as, obtaining additional admin-
istrative or legislative authority (i.e. regulatory legislation) are eligible
for funding and have a high priority.
Develop Operational Programs
Most initial plans will require additional effort for the development of effec-
tive operational programs. With few exceptions most States have relied heavily
on ongoing programs. Issues concerning additional non-Federal resource require-
ments were generally not given much attention. The CPP should address the
questions of providing technical assistance and cost sharing through non-Federal
sources, and developing additional administrative and legislative authorities
required to meet the program decisions agreed to in the initial plan. Some
examples include State and local budget support for management staffs, including
enforcement; State and local cost sharing programs; administrative regulations
requiring BMPs on State leased land; etc.
Program Tasks
Headquarters
1. As requested, assist Regional Offices in the
development of Regional agricultural strategy.
2. Define and provide examples of acceptable agri-
culture NPS elements to Regional Offices & States.
3. Develop additional cooperative agreements as re-
quired. Define functions and areas where Regions
and States may use USDA (ASCS, SCS, SEA, FS), USDI,
and TVA to complete agriculture NPS programs.
4. Provide Regions and States with information on the
mechanisms States have developed to fund the opera-
tional elements of the agriculture NPS programs and
on regulatory agricultural NPS programs.
Regions
5. Develop Regional agricultural NPS strategy.
6. Identify those States with acceptable agricultural
NPS plans and those States with inadequate elements.
Define requirements and work elements necessary to
make the plans acceptable. This analysis is needed
as input into the Regional strategy.
Scheduled Action
Assist three Regions
prior to 3-80
Quarterly; Starting
3-80
Develop two coopera-
tive agreements in
FY 80
Quarterly, starting
5-80
Complete 3-80
Complete 2-80
69
-------
7. Use the cooperative agreements to assist States Each Region develop
in utilizing the expertise of USDA (ASCS, SCS, minimum of 1 program
SEA, FS) and other agencies (DOI, TVA) to com-
plete their State agriculture NFS programs.
8. Negotiate State/EPA Agreements and develop 208 Complete for FY 81
work plans to correct the inadequacies of State
agricultural NFS plans.
Funding Decisions
9. Fully approved Agricultural NPS elements are generally not eligible for
funding. Hhere conditions change, the continuing planning program may
be required to address plan additions or revisions.
10. Funding will be available only to those States with:
(a) Significant agricultural NPS problems.
(b) Agricultural NPS elements which were found to be inadequate in
the initial 208 plan.
11. Funding will not be provided for further problem identification activity
in designated RCWP projects.
12. BMP Handbooks for soil and water conservation practices will not be
funded. Pesticide and nutrient BMP activity may be funded.
13. 208 funds can not be used to cost share BMP implementation.
14. Those States addressing regulatory programs for agricultural NPS controls
shall be given funding priority.
Federal Legislative Initiatives
15. Reauthorization of 208 planning grants beyond FY 80.
70
-------
OBJECTIVE 2
Develop a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation (M&E) program to:
• Determine the cause and effect relationship between agricultural
activities, NPS pollutants and their impact on stream quality.
t Evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs on stream quality;
0 Determine the degree of control necessary to meet water quality
qoals.
National Policy Direction
Initial plans have defined the agricultural NPS problem on a broad scale.
However, only limited information is available regarding the effect of
agricultural activities at the field, farm and small watershed level. There
is a need to analyze the effect of NPS pollutants on stream quality from various
farming activities and to evaluate the cost effectiveness of BMPs applied to
correct or prevent those problems. A comprehensive M&E program, including
technical guidance, is being developed in coordination with the Office of
Research and Development. The M&E Guidance document will be jointly released
by ORD and OWWM and will provide guidance for:
• General M&E which will normally consist of a few stations to determine
BMP effectiveness in selected projects. An example is the requirement
for a general M&E program in all approved Rural Clean Water Program
(RCWP) projects. General M&E is also being conducted in a number of
Model Implementation (MIP) and ACP Special Projects.
• Intensive M&E which will be utilized to determine detailed cause and
effect relationships in a very limited number of areas (projects in
the major type of agricultural activity areas such as dairy farming,
corn belt and wheat belt cropping systems, irrigated agriculture, etc).
Intensive M&E will be restricted to nationally approved projects.
M&E guidance being developed must be utilized for all intensive M&E projects.
Additionally all monitorinq and evaluation funded, beginning with FY 80, will
be conducted in accordance"with the Administrator's June 14, 1979, memorandum:
Quality Assurance Requirements for all EPA Extramural Projects Involving
Environmental Measurements.
Discussion
There is a lack of information regarding the causes and effects of NPS
pollution and cost effectiveness of control programs. This has been stated
in the initial plans, in GAO reports, and in the recent Congressional Oversight
Hearing on NPS pollution.
71
-------
This information is required to establish appropriate BMPs, determine the costs
and benefits of a NFS control program, convince landowners and the public that
the required investment is appropriate and, where required, provide justifi-
cation for enforcement actions. The information will be obtained through
both general and intensive M&E in project areas where BMPs are being applied
on an accelerated basis. These projects will normally be restricted to RCHP,
MIPs, Special Water Quality Projects, projects where State funded cost sharing
is available and research projects. A number of field evaluation (M&E) projects
will be funded with ORD funds in FY 80.
Approximately ten projects (including those selected under RCWP), representative
of different types of farming operations, climatic and soil conditions,
combinations of BMPs, and receiving water use will be selected for intensive
study of cause/effect relationships. The intensive M&E projects are costly
and will normally have a time span of not less than five years. Information
from these projects will be used in other areas with similar problems and
conditions.
Priority for both intensive and general M&E projects will be given to the
accelerated implementation projects (MIPs, Special Water Quality Projects,
RCWP projects) to make use of the administrative and management structure,
the baseline data, the commitment of USDA agencies and the institutional
structure already developed.
Intensive M&E projects approved under the RCWP will receive funds from that
program. Other intensive M&E projects will be funded mainly with 208 funds
although 106, 314 and research funds may also be used. Those RCWP projects
which are not selected for intensive M&E will require a general M&E program.
Assurances that such a program will be conducted must be forthcoming before
final project approval is given. Funds for general M&E may be provided from
a number of sources; 208, 106, other Federal programs, State and local funds,
etc.
Program Tasks Scheduled Action
Headquarters
1. Develop draft monitoring and evaluation guidelines 3-80
with ORD assistance (September 1, 1979). Finalize
detailed monitoring and evaluation guidance.
2. Based upon an analysis of State 208 plans and the 2-80
advice of Regional Offices and States, develop a
matrix of water quality conditions, types of farm
operations, pollutants and BMP systems to be covered
by the intensive monitoring'and evaluation studies.
72
-------
3. Develop a monitoring and evaluation strategy that 3.30
classifies pollutants, water quality conditions and
combinations of BMPs for different agricultural enter-
prises to determine the required mix of monitoring and
evaluation proposals. The M&E project proposals will
cover a variety of conditions, pollutants and BMP
systems and will be prioritized with the assistance
of Regional Offices and States. The classification
of pollutants, conditions and BMP systems will be
used as a check to cover as many matrix elements as
possible within existing resources. The strategy
will integrate the mix of conditions to be studied
in order to: 1) determine the cause/effect rela-
tionship of selected NPS pollutants on water quality;
2) to estimate the effectiveness of BMP systems
on preventing pollutants from reaching the stream
for different types of farming operations; and,
3) the amount of control required to meet water
quality goals.
4. In cooperation with USDA, select the RCWP M&E 3-80
projects.
5. In cooperation with the Regional Offices and States, 3-80
select projects for intensive M&E with 208 funding.
6. Assist in development of work plans for RCWP and 208 Complete 2-80
funded intensive M&E projects.
7. Coordinate with Q.RD on its M&E Projects. Ongoing
8. Establish system to provide Regions with informa- 6-80
tion obtained from the M&E projects.
Regions
9. Recommend appropriate RCWP and 208 funded projects 12-79
for intensive M&E.
10. Assist appropriate States to develop M&E plans Complete 3-80
for RCWP projects and 208 funded M&E projects,
both general and intensive.
11. Negotiate FY 1980 208 grant agreements to fund Complete 3-80
general and intensive monitoring and evaluation
project activities.
73
-------
OBJECTIVE 3
Expedite the Implementation of Agriculture NFS Control Programs:
• Utilize the resources and authorities of EPA, USDA and other agencies
(USDI, TVA) to accelerate the implementation of approved/certified
State agriculture MPS programs.
t Seek additional resources to fund the implementation of agriculture
MPS programs (Federal, State, local).
• Encourage States to use their existing water pollution legislative
authorities as necessary, to secure the application of BMPs by
farmers who will not participate in voluntary programs.
National Policy Direction
Implementation is the highest priority of the agricultural NPS strategy.
Aggressive national and Regional leadership is reguired to assist States to
make use of their own authorities and the authorities and resources of Federal
agencies to expedite the implementation of agriculture NPS control programs.
Regional Project Officers will work with States and other agencies to develop
at least one accelerated implementation project for a priority agricultural
water guality problem area in each State, in addition to ongoing MIP, ACP
special projects and RCWP projects.
Discussion
Environmental and agricultural programs provide incentives which can be used
to assist to meet the national goals of fishable/swimmable waters while
maintaining an adeguate food and fiber base.
Regions must work with local, State, and other Federal planning and management
agencies who have the authority, delivery systems and resources to implement
NPS controls. The means for implementing priority projects include:
• RCWP projects.
• Additional ACP projects.
• Agreements with other Federal and State agencies to transfer or add
resources to work in priority areas. This includes Soil Conservation
Service, Cooperative Extension Service, T.V.A., Bureau of Land
Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Forest Service, State agricultural
and forestry agencies, etc.
• Provision of State and local cost sharing programs.
74
-------
Funding Decisions
12. Intensive M&E projects funded by 208 or RCWP must be consistent with
the national M&E project priorities.
13. 208 funds for other than intensive M&E projects will be limited to
trend analysis on RCWP projects and special projects where M&E is
already underway. Other funding sources will also be utilized.
14. All M&E projects must follow EPA's Quality Assurance Requirements.
Federal Legislative Initiatives
15. None
-------
• Provision to re-direct funds by those agencies whose program objectives
are enhanced by NFS control programs, (ie) Highway Department,
Irrigation Districts, Fish and Game Agencies, etc.
6 Local and State regulatory programs.
The Administrator reiterated his support of non-regulatory agricultural
control programs on July 18, 1979, before the Subcommittee on Oversight and
Review, House Committee on Public Works and Transportation. However, a
number of States have developed backup authority to ensure that non-participating
farmers do not gain an economic advantage over cooperating farmers by their
failure to implement BMPs.
Iowa, South Dakota and Pennsylvania have adopted regulatory controls for
agricultural erosion and sediment problems. Other States such as Washington
rely on a voluntary program but refer non-participating farmers (those who
have had a valid complaint filed against them and refuse to correct their
problems) to the Department of Ecology for action. Without violating the
concept of a voluntary program, there are a number of mechanisms that can be
used to monitor program compliance.
Various management tools are available to accelerate NFS control programs.
For example, where pesticide use is substantial, in addition to an on-farm
integrated pest management program, container disposal may require attention.
Consideration may be given to establishing a system of disposal fees included
in the price of the pesticide to support a program for proper disposal of
containers in these situations.
Regional project officers are the key to assisting States in implementing their
agriculture NPS program. The umbrella USDA/EPA agreement and agreements
between EPA and individual USDA agencies should be used by project officers
to develop projects with USDA on shifting its resources to meet State priorities.
Agencies in the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Tennessee Valley
Authority can also assist States with their agriculture NPS control programs.
Other examples for NPS implementation include Bureau of Land Management leases
requiring performance standards to protect water quality and Title V Regional
Economic Development Commission funds used to establish BMP demonstration
projects.
A few States (Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, etc.) have developed cost share
programs to subsidize the costs of BMPs. Regions should assist States in
these types of legislative initiatives by providing information on State
cost share programs and encouraging their adoption.
Regions should identify and evaluate conflicting, inflexible and ineffective
programs. Problems with State and local laws, ordinances and programs should
be included in any evaluation process. A major example is the prior appropriation
rights water law common in the western States.
76
-------
A key element in the strategy is the training assistance given to designated
management agencies in the utilization of management tools in their States to
accelerate NPS implementation. As part of this assistance, a number of manage-
ment agency workshops will be conducted in FY 80 and FY 81.
Program Tasks
Headquarters
1. Provide information to Regional Offices and
States on innovative management and legislative/
administrative initiatives to secure the implemen-
tation of NPS controls.
2. Work with national agricultural organizations to
enlist their support for implementation program.
3. Develop material which will be used in management
agency workshops. With Regions, schedule work-
shops as required. National Association of
Conservation Districts (NACD) will provide
consulting services and have a major responsi-
bility for the scheduling and conduct of
workshops.
Regions
Scheduled Action
Quarterly beginning
1-80
Continuing
6 workshops; 2 per
quarter in 2nd, 3rd, &
4th quarters.
of
Develop better communication among State water
quality agencies, designated management agencies
and ASCS, SEA, SCS, BIA, TVA, BLM, etc. Methods
accomplishment include work shops, establishing
advisory groups, etc.
Assist States, ACP development committees and
other agencies to focus technical assistance
(SCS, SEA, FS) and funds (ACP, Small Farm
Demonstration projects, State cost-share
programs Title V Regional Development Commission
funds, etc) in at least one priority area per
State to expedite the implementation of agri-
culture NPS control practices.
Assist States to develop leases and contracts
which include stipulations to protect water
quality on public lands with the Bureau of
Land Management, Forest Service and Tennessee
Valley Authority, as appropriate. Select at
least one priority area per State and develop
agreement.
Encourage States to use their existing legislative/
administrative authorities to secure compliance
from non-cooperating operators. Develop program
in at least one State per Region.
Throughout year
Identify project 1-80
Initiate 4-80
Initiate 5-80
By 6-80
77
-------
8. Assist in initiating, scheduling and conduct of Initial selection 12-79
management agency workshops. Locations will be Final selections 1-80
limited to those Regions which request workshops. Workshops start 3-80
Workshops completed 8/80
Funding Decisions
9. Approve RCWP project applications.
Federal Legislative Initiatives
10. Extend RCWP (208j) authorization.
-------
OBJECTIVE 4
Develop a Management Information System for evaluating the effectiveness of
the Agriculture MRS control program.
National Policy Direction
The WQM program will be evaluated on its success in implementing 208 planning
decisions which will lead to meeting the Nation's water qua!ity goals. A
management information system which will provide data for evaluating the NPS
program is to be developed. Agriculture will be a key element in the system
developed.
Discussion
Hundreds of management agencies have been designated to implement agricultural
NPS programs. These agencies were generally in operation and were given the
additional responsibility for water guality management. The success of the
agricultural NPS program depends to a great degree on their concerted efforts.
EPA has not normally worked with management agencies on a continuing basis.
Presently, there is no system by which the implementation program (water guality
outputs) of these agencies can be determined. EPA does not have any system
by which this information can be collected and analyzed (ie) there is no way
by which we can determine if a program's goals are being met or if we can
judge whether a program is successful.
An approach is reguired which recognizes EPA's resource limitations and
utilizes the delivery systems of other agencies (local, State and Federal)
to provide required data.
Program Tasks Scheduled Action
Headquarters
1. Form a management information system task force of Initiate 11-79
Headquarters, Regional, ORD, USDA and State Complete 6-80
representatives to:
a. Establish the scope of the system;
b. identify the data elements to be included in
the system;
c. evaluate information collection and transfer
mechanisms and recommend a system that will
provide the user community with timely and
accurate information on the implementation
of agriculture nonpoint source control programs.
2. With the Regions, develop criteria to be used to Initiate 1-80
document the success of State agriculture NPS Complete 6-80
control programs.
79
-------
Regions
3. Develop with States, the criteria to be used to Initiate 3-80
evaluate the States' and the designated management Complete 9-80
agencies' success in implementing agricultural
nonpoint source control programs.
Funding Decisions
4. None
Federal Legislative Initiatives
5. None
SO
-------
OBJECTIVE 5
Policy issue analysis required to provide basis for Agency's long range
agricultural strategy.
National Policy Direction
To date, agricultural NFS policy and programs have focused on utilizing
presently available legislative authority, resources and institutions. It
is believed that significant short term progress in NFS implementation can
be achieved in this manner. However, the strategy should also consider long
range needs in the above areas. It is also necessary to evaluate a number of
broader agricultural policy issues to determine their long range effect on the
Nation's water quality goals.
Discussion
There are a number of policy and program issues which must be reviewed in
order to determine what actions are required to assure that the agricultural
NFS strategy is revised as required, addresses changing needs and remains
consistent with other program policies in the Administration.
No major policy or program shifts are expected within the next two years.
However, there are a number of policy issues which require analysis at this
time.
For the past few years agricultural production has been curtailed as a matter
of national policy (ex., set aside programs). It now appears that this policy
is changing and production constraints will be lifted. The effect will be
to bring more land into crop production. This land is often marginal and
may require more management to prevent NFS pollution from occurring. A
coordinated policy will be required to assure that agricultural and environmental
goals are mutually recognized and that programs consistent with those goals
are adopted.
Another issue which has surfaced in recent years is the need to adapt agricul-
tural incentive programs to meet environmental goals. There is some discussion
in Congress and within the Administration regarding the need for better
coordination of various economic incentive programs with national environmental
goals. For example; legislation has been introduced to require that farmers
who utilize Federal assistance programs for crop insurance also be required to
adopt a soil and water resource plan. Support for this concept is growing.
It is important for EPA to analyze the effects of this and other legislative
efforts to develop policy positions and structure its long range strategy to
accommodate changes in national agricultural policy.
81
-------
Most States have adopted a non-regulatory approach for their agricultural
nonpoint source control program. However, a number of States have adopted
various regulatory mechanisms to support the non-regulatory approach.
Evaluation of the various approaches will be undertaken to determine the
effectiveness of each. It is expected that a period of three to five
years will be required to make a determination of program effectiveness,
A few States have adopted the general permit concept for various NFS activities,
including some related to agriculture. These initial efforts should be
evaluated to determine their effectiveness and utility in other areas and
for other situations. Another issue which requires attention is the utilization
of section 313 to assist designated management agencies in their efforts in
working with other Federal agencies to accelerate NPS implementation on public
lands.
While there are a large number of issues which might be studied it is important
to recognize resource limitations in this area. Only one or two major issues
will be evaluated within a fiscal year.
Program Tasks Scheduled Action
Headquarters
1. Work closely with USDA, national agricultural and Continuing
environmental organizations and others on national
agricultural policy issues.
2. Evaluate policy issues relevant to WQM program, Continuing
utilize ORD to assist in analyses and decisions
on long range issues.
3. Develop work groups as required to study and Select issue 1-80
provide recommendations on policy changes. Convene work groups 3-80
Complete study 7-80
4. Revise agricultural NPS strategy as required. 9-80
Regions
5. Participate in Headquarters' work groups. Continuing
Funding Decisions
6. Provide contract assistance.
Federal Legislative Initiatives
7. Provide Agency recommendations on Administration oolicy and congressional
legislation.
-------
SilviciiHural NPS Program
FY 80
I. INTRODUCTION
This program will strengthen EPA and Forest Service Cooperation
to help achieve and maintain water quality goals.
EPA relies on authorities and responsibilities of the Forest Service
to assist in implementing water quality management plans. The
Forest Service (FS) has these authorities and responsibilities through
management of National Forests, State and Private Cooperative Programs,
and Forestry Research. While forestry planning and management
practices incorporate water quality management, these activities
often consider WQM secondary and the WQM aspects of forestry activities
are often not appropriately recognized and applied. This program while
not significantly altering current forestry planning or management
practices will highlight and assure implementation of the WQM aspects
of these forestry activities. It will provide WQM emphasis for forestry
activities in concert with WQM legislation and objectives.
EPA is responsible under P.L. 95-217 for cleaning up our Nation's waters,
while FS is responsible for conservation of renewable resources on all
forestlands. Since both agencies share conmon concerns for the environment
and WQM, it is appropriate to pool their technical and financial resources
as well as share institutional arrangements of both agencies to aggressively
address WQM problems.
Successful joint EPA-FS efforts have primarily been completed. This indicates
the agencies can work together effectively, but to hasten implementation of
WQM plans, a new thrust in forestry WQM is needed.
II. PROBLEM
Although pollution from silvicultural activities is not considered a
major overall WQM problem, localized problems result from inadequate
application of forestry practices. Preventative measures must also
be Implemented to avoid future potential problems resulting from
silvicultural activities.
Forestry planning and management procedures and standards generally
contain WQM provisions. However, when these WQM procedures are not
implemented, WQ problems become apparent. FS, through its forestry
leadership role can assist EPA in WQM by emphasizing the WQM aspects
of forestry practices to assure implementation of WQM precedures and
instill concern for WQ in forestry programs and landowners objectives.
83
-------
III. SILVICUTURAL PROGRAM FOR UQM
A. Objectives
Initiate a two year intensive effort with Forest Service to
assure that UQM aspects of forestry planning and management
practices are properly applied. To meet this objective, the
program must instill a water quality awareness in forestry programs
and landowners activities. It must also increase water quality
emphasis on both short and long range forestry programs.
B. Strategy
The FS can be the focal point for implementing the silvicultural
program. The FS with its expertise and institutional arrangements
with the forestry community can provide the leadership needed
to assure proper planning and application of WQM practices. EPA
will also commit financial assistance and use of its institutional
arrangements to the FS to assure acceleration of WQM silvicultural
activities. Specific arrangements regarding implementation of this
silvicultural program will be developed in a FS-EPA Agreement.
Four areas of FS involvment will be initiated to fulfill FS
management responsibility and assure that silvicultural portions
of WQM plans will be refined and implemented. They are:
1. Substantive review of the 1980 Forest and Rangeland
Renewable Resources Assessment and Program (RPA)
2. Prototype Planning Projects
(a) National Forest Land Management Planning
(b) State Forestry Resources Plans
3. Prototype FIP and ACP Implementation Projects
4. Information and Education Emphasis
Initiation of these four major areas requires participation of
various functional and administrative units within both orgainzations.
This will strengthen FS-EPA relations for achieving the environmental
quality goals of our Nation.
Existing institutional arrangements such as steering committees,
workgroups etc. will be used to the extent possible to implement
the program.
84
-------
C. Approach
The objectives_of the sHvlcultural program for WQM will be achieved
by the completion of the following items:
I) Substantive review of the 1980 Forest and Rangeland Renewable
Resources Assessment and Program (RPAR)
The Office of Environmental Review (OER) has the responsibility
to develop the procedures for a substantive review of the WQM
aspects of the RPAR document. This process was initiated in
FY-79 and will be continued through 1980, as appropriate.
2) Prototype Planning and Implementation Projects
(a) National Forest Land Management Planning
The Office of Environmental Review (OER), in cooperation with
the USFS, will provide assistance to facilitate adequate
WQM considerations in the plans and assure National Forest
Coordination with State and local WQM agencies. One prototype
forest will be selected to review the planning process as
defined by the National Forest Management Act.
(b) State Forestry Resource Plans
Three cooperative prototype projects (Indiana, Colorado, and
New Hampshire) have been developed to identify and document
the mechanism for assuring the incorporation of adequate
water quality management considerations into the State
Forestry Planning Process. The results of these studies will
be monitored and used to stimulate similar activities in other
States.
(3) Forest Incentives Program (FIP) and Agricultural Conservation
Program (ACP) projects.
FIP and ACP provide site specific application of forestry
practices. These practices are usually conducted for timber
production, but they do provide water quality benefits. To
assure that the WQM aspects of these programs are recognized,
EPA and FS will establish prototype projects. These projects
will apply forestry BMPs and encourage use of these practices
to improve water quality as well as increase timber production.
Project results will be documented and publicized to encourage
States and landowners to use these programs for water quality
improvements. A training program will be prepared for use by
service foresters.
85
-------
ASCS manages the ACP cost-sharing program. The agency encourages
use of the ACP program for applying forestry practices for WQM.
This proposal compliments ASCS objectives and they will be
actively involved in the projects. EPA will contribute use of
its institutional arrangements and expertise to implement the
program and provide financial assistance for training programs
and publishing results of the projects.
(4) Information And Education Projects
A joint USES/EPA Workgroup has been developed for the purpose of
preparing a basic training package for managers, loggers and
operators and land owners which clearly identifies potential NFS
problems and the need for best management practices. EPA is
providing the financial support for this program and will utiliz
this infromation to seek better compliance of BMP guidance for
water quality protection.
IV Tasks
The following tasks are identified for program implementation.
(1) Develop procedures for the coordinating of the EPA-RPA
Review 6/80 (OER)
(2a) Establish Program objectives
o Select Project 11/80 (OER)
o Develop Work Plan 3/80 (OER)
o Initiate Project 6/80 (OER)
(2b) o Monitor Program Progress - continuing
o Publicize Results - 10/80
(3) o Provide on-site technical
assistance - continuing
o Develop cooperative projects
(3 sites max) - continuing
o Provide program policy and
guidance for on-going
silvicultural projects - as reqd.
(4) o Develop contracts for preparation
of training material - 3/80
o Develop Implementation Plan for
training program - 6/80
o Review progress and integrate
completed elements into silviculture
program - continuing
86
-------
o Conduct Regional awareness seminars
to promote utilization of training
and planning programs - 6/80; 10/80
-------
CONSTRUCTION NFS PROGRAM
FY 80
PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENACTMENT OF LAWS TO CONTROL
CONSTRUCTION RELATED NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION.
OBJECTIVE:
Becuase of the lack of regulatory Statewide legislation in most of
the U.S. to control pollution resulting from construction activities,
the principal purpose of this program will be to provide assistance
to States for the development and enactment of such regu-
latory mechanisms. Seminars are to be conducted in selected States
that were not involved in the FY 79 program. They are to meet the
following objectives:
1. Identify construction problems in seminar States
2. Provide information on available control measures
3. Discuss accomplishments made by other States in this area
4. Identify approaches to problem solution available to
seminar States
5. Encourages States to conduct needed follow-up action
identify organization to accompany it
STRATEGY:
The strategy for continuing this program will include working with a
number of States to initiate the development and implementation of effective
State laws to control construction-related nonpoint source pollution. At
least one of these States will be located in the region West of the Rocky
Mountains where no statewide laws have been enacted.
An important part of this program will be to obtain public participation;
more clearly identify the State's problems, particularly in priority areas;
describe technical, institutional, and legal measures usable for controlling
or preventing this pollution; report how other States have approached the
problem; and initiate definite action by the States to develop and implement
control laws and programs regarding construction-related nonpoint source
pollution.
Speakers and participants at seminars are to provide information regarding the
magnitude and extent of the problem, the potential solutions, and what the
State's actions should be. They will represent State and local agencies,
EPA and other appropriate Federal agencies, and other concerned land developers
88
-------
engineers and contractors, landscape architects, environmental organizations
and other similar groups. yam^uons,
_WORK ELEMENTS:
Headquarters
Headquarters personnel will provide guidance and technical and institutional
information to EPA Regional staff, the States, and the public groups
involved. Funds will be provided to obtain participation by certain
public groups.
Regions
Regional staff will support State personnel in the conduct of the
program, participate in seminars, provide information on problems
regarding construction activities in the State, and help arrange
for participation in the program by local sections of national
environmental and other groups.
Other Participating Groups
Other participating groups will involve, for example, the various
State and Federal agencies involved in construction, County Engineers,
Council of Governments, State legislative members, League of Women
Voters, Conservation Districts, Public Works Associations members,
and the International Erosion Control Association. This list is
not inclusive and will be refined on a continuing basis as the EPA
constituency groups are identified. These groups will participate
by providing information on problem areas, measures for control, cost
and effectiveness of measures, and environmental benefits.
SCHEDULE:
1. With provision of Regional support, solicit program participation
by appropriate seminar States. (January 1980)
2. Aid selected States in seminar program planning and devleopment of
federal work program. (February - April 1980)
3. Develop and award grant to public groups to assist in conductng
seminars. (March - May 1980)
4. Conduct seminars. (As reqd)
5. Provide technical consultation and institutional information
to committees established as a result of seminars. (August 1980)
6. Provide information to 208 State and areawide WQM agencies and
other State agencies on results of seminar programs. (September 1980)
89
-------
Mining NPS Program
FY 80
INFORMATION:
The purpose of the FY-80 Mining Program is to define a common mineral strategy
and implementation action program to stimulate and provide direction for appro-
priate and effective-implementation of nonpoint source controls over common
minerals mining.
STRATEGY:
Examine selected technical and institutional WQM aspects of common minerals
mining from a national prescriptive, formulate an Agency strategy and control
implementation program in conjunction with the Financial Management Assistance
Project, that will serve to stimulate and provide direction for appropriate
and effective implementation of nonpoint source controls.
WORK ELEMENTS:
Headquarters
1. Begin examination of common minerals mining - March 1980
2. Review procedures in at least three (3) States in different
Regions - June 1980
3. Gather additional material as necessary - July - August 1980
4. Formulate a common minerals mining strategy and NPS control
implementation work program. September - October 1980.
PRODUCTS
An Agency WQM strategy and implementation action program for nonpoint
sources contorls over common minerals mining.
90
-------
Implementation Branch
Facilities Management Section
FY 1980 Workplan
Summary of Objectives
I. Ensure that 208 issues, especially nonpoint source water quality
impacts, are integrated into Task Force recommendations.
II. Demonstrate how the WQM process can contribute to defensible AWT
decisions through integrated program management (WQS to WLA to Effluent
Limitations to NPDES permits to Step 1 Facilities Planning to NPS/AWT Program
Integration and Implementation).
A. Resolve WQM policy issues related to AWT including nonpoint source
interfaces.
B. Arrange technical, managerial and financial assistance for selected
prototype projects concerning AWT issues. Utilize Technical Assistance
and prototype projects to facilitate NPS/AWT program integration and
development of compatible NPS policy.
C. Track the progress of prototype projects that demonstrate practical
techniques for AWT planning and which jointly maximize the use of
ongoing programs for PS/NPS trade-off analyses.
D. Follow-up on site specific AWT Task Force recommendations which
necessitate reanalysis of wasteload allocations especially where
NPS runoff is or may have significant impact.
91
-------
III. Participate in the resolution of 201-208 issues including the
optimum use of 201 grant money and other funding sources for ongoing
integration of point source/municipal facilities elements into the WQM
program.
A. Refine and update the continuing WQM role in the 201 program,
including NPS considerations.
B. Develop a funding strategy, given 208 funding constraints, to deal
with 201-208 issues in the WQM program using Federal (106, 201, 205(g)),
State, and local resources.
NOTE: This FY 1980 Workplan expands and updates the workplan entitled
"Advanced Wastewater Treatment Planning and Review Program" contained in
the "FY 79 Work Programs - Water Planning Division (December 1978)". The
FY 1979 workplan provided some additional background information, roles/
responsibilities, and strategic considerations which are not repeated here.
Readers may wish to refer to this previous document for such additional
information.
-------
Objective I.
Ensure that 208 issues, especially nonpoint source water quality impacts,
are integrated into Task Force recommendations.
General Approach
The Facilities Management Section of the Water Planning Division has the
responsibility to assist the Headquarters AWT Task Force in their review of
proposed projects. From the beginning of the review through the final report,
section staff are involved with the review of each task force project. On
a weekly basis Section personel attend the task force meetings to be briefed
of the status of the projects that are under review. At this time, consultant
reports on facility and water quality issues are discussed. From this
information a preliminary indication of which project might have nonpoint source
problems is made. Those projects with possible nonpoint source problems are
then investigated in detail by this Section. The regional 208 coordinator
responsible for the project planning area is contacted. Further detail
on the nonpoint source problems and additional documentation is collected.
This step may also involve contact with the State or areawide agencies.
The OWPO project officer is contacted and appropriate language concerning nonpoint
sources is incorporated into the interim and final reports.
During the concurrence process, each OWPS Division is given the opportunity
to comment on the interim reports. These reports are also sent to the Region,
State and grantee for comment. The Section is responsible for making final
written comment on the report prior to signture by the Administrator. Final
corrections concerning nonpoint source and WQM issues, the introduction of
new information and the opportunity to make general comments concerning the
•93
-------
report and the recommendations are formally transmitted to the task force during
the concurrence period.
The section is also responsible for attending meetings with Regional, State,
and local officials and recieving their comments on the interim reports. For
controversial and complicated projects, this many involve extensive discussions
and negotiations.
The decisions made by the task force will affect EPA policy and guidance relative
to the planning for and funding of advanced treatment facilities. This
section also has the responsibility to participate in the development of such
policy and guidance. This coordination of EPA programs should lead to more
comprehensive justifications for later AWT projects.
Tasks for Objective I
1. Attend the weekly Task Force meetings to keep the Division abreast
of project reviews and policy issues, including nonpoint source impacts.
2. Contact the regional 208 coordinator for each project under review
to assess the significance of 208 and nonpoint source issues.
3. Coordinate with other OWPS Divisions and OWPO project officers
to develop interim and final decisions on each project.
4. Work with the OWPO project officer to incorporate appropriate
information, conclusions and recommendations concerning the impact
of nonpoint sources and the overall WQM process, (especially when
regionalization is involved) into the task force reports.
-------
5. Prepare the official Division comments during the concurrence process.
6. Participate in meetings with Regional, State and local officials
concerning their responses to interim task force decisions.
7. Review and comment on emerging EPA policy and guidance concerning
the review of advanced waste treatment projects and incorporate WQM
issues, particularly nonpoint sources, population projections, and
areawide service boundaries.
-------
Objective II
Demonstrate how the WQM process will contribute to defensible AWT
decisions through integrated program management (WQS to WLA to Effluent
Limitations to NPDES permits to Step 1 Facilities Planning to NPS/AWT
Program Integration and Implementation).
General Approach
Bascially the Branch will deal with two situations; first, where effluent
limitations and technical evaluations are inadequate; and, second where
effluent limitations are still being developed. The key input that the Branch
will provide for the complex process of awarding construction grants is a
better understanding of the trade-offs between point and nonpoint source
controls and how this information can be used for making better WQM decisions.
Individual project outputs should provide or directly lead to scientifically
defensible WLA's.
Ideally the information from this activity would be used as part of the
pre-application conference prior to award of Step 1 grants. But because
many important projects have proceeded into or past the Step 1 phase this activity
may impinge on the process at various stages. Thus, in some cases, we may have
to provide support for projects that are into the Step 2 design stage where
NPS impacts are suspect and alternatives to advanced waste treatment have not
been adequately considered because of deficient WLA's.
The most difficult part of this activity will be to integrate our input into
the ongoing process for WQM and construction grants while minimizing the impact
on specific grant projects. To do this the formal lines of accountability and
operation must be well understood.
-------
Waste!oad allocations done for individual treatment plants often ignore
benthic loadings due to NPS, toxic effects of ammonia, etc. In certain
situations low or intermittently flowing streams are involved and there
is a poor understanding of deoxygenation. In other situations the upstream
or background WQ conditions are often poorly identified, especially
for nutrients and ammonia. The downstream impact of nutrients on lakes
and flowing streams is often poorly understood too. Added to this may
be questionable projections for the year 2000 population and commerical
wastewater loadings. Also, nearly all waste!oad allocations have one or more
rate coefficient that needs additional information. Because of these uncertainties
a high degree of reluctance to use some models can develop.
The Regions operate and maintain accountability more or less in a "project
management" mode for construction grant processing. Project officers are
•
for the most part technically oriented administrative specialists who guide
the grant applications through the "red tape". As necessary, technical and other
experts are brought into the process by the project officer. Grants administration
experts assist with much of the financial aspects of grants. Other experts
brought in may require knowledge of water quality standards, in-depth knowledge
of EPA regulations, firsthand knowledge of State and local environmental
conditions, modelling, and state-of-the-art treatment technology.
In most Regions the Water Planning staff are heavily involved as experts during
the Step 1 and 2 reviews. A key input to the proces is the waste!oad allocation.
Despite the obvious advantage of an acceptable WLA during the pre-Step 1 application
phase effluent limitations must often be developed or improved during a later stage.
Most if not all operational aspects of preparing the WLA are done by the State.
-------
This delegation of WLA authority to the States complicates the lines of accountability
and limits the control of the Regional project officer. In nearly all Regions
a detailed technical review of the WLA is not done by the Regional project officer.
A variety of resources can be utilized to provide the needed technical
support at the Region for its responsibilities on AWT decision-making. The
role of this Section is most important in reviews where national policy issues
overlap into operational areas. In these instances resources and expertise can
be arranged and provided by us.
Tasks for Objective II
Subobjective 11.A. Resolve WQH policy issues related to AWT including nonpoint
source i nterfaces.
1. Coordinate within OWPS to resolve questions on WQ Standards, WLA's,
monitoring requirements, NFS analyses, and WQM Plan Implementation.
2. Assist in preparation of Headquarters AWT policy.
3. Attend Headquarters and Regional meetings to deal with issues impinging
on existing or draft Headquarters policy.
4. Prepare memoranda, papers, and presentations discussing the implications
of nonpoint source analyses.
5. Coordinate with OWPO to ensure that Regional and Headquarters (> $3 million)
reviews utilize NPS guidelines and procedures for AWT project screening
and project review.
6. Coordinate with other EPA Headquarters officers, such as OTS, ORD,
etc., to maintain currency with new and developing techniques for
PS/NPS trade-off assessment.
-------
Subobjective II.B. Arrange technical, managerial and financial assistance for
selected prototype projects concerning AWT issues. Utilize Technical Assistance
and prototype projects to facilitate NPS/AHT program integration and development of
compatible NPs policy.
1. For prototype AWT projects, provide where necessary combined technical,
financial and managerial assistance to States or select areawide
agencies, utilizing in-house staff and contractor assistance.
0 Review and comment on Regional requests for Technical Assistance and
prepare 208-AWT Project Summary.
0 Communicate with the Region and attend meetings if necessary to
screen final selections for assistance.
0 Coordinate with Regions on the timing and execution of the TA.
0 Assist in development of work programs for the TA.
0 Prepare Work Assignments and screen contractor workplans.
Attend Regional meeting(s) to initiate Technical Assistance grant.
0 Coordinate provisions of technical assistance by other OWPS Divisions.
2. Obtain additional contractor assistance as needed.
99
-------
3. Participate in selection and review of financial management
assistance (FMAP) projects involving point source issues.
4. Refine program objectives based on review and comments by Regions,
consultants and OWPO/FRD.
5. Scrutinize Regional workplans and Needs Survey/GICS for major
involvement of 201/208 resources.
6. Integrate the Branch's other NPS activities, information and
policy into the NPS/AWT process.
Subobjective II.C. Track the progress of prototype projects that demonstrate
practical techniques for AWT planning and which jointly maximize the use of ongoing
programs for PS/NPS trade-off analyses.
1. Analyze interim outputs against contractor workplans, especially
for selection of models, emphasis on sensitive rate coefficients,
field survey techniques, and nonpoint source loading projections.
2. Review, evaluate, and comment on progress reports for each
workplan output.
3. Coordinate progress reports with Regional project officers to
identify early problems in meeting the objectives of the work
assignments.
4. Ensure coordination of interim and final project outputs with
OWPO/FRD and OWPS/MDSD and CSD.
100
-------
5. Prepare quarterly progress reports.
6. Recommend new WQM policy and program strategy especially on joint
PS/NPS issues.
7. Disseminate project reports to WQM and other interested agencies
and review comments.
Subobjective II.D Follow-up on specific Headquarters Advanced Treatment Task^
Force recommendations which necessitate reanalysis of allocations especially
where NPS runoff is or may have significant impact.
1. Assess the recommendations of Headquarters Advanced Treatment Task
Force reviews for follow-up on WQM-related deficiencies.
2. Coordinate with Regional 208 project officers to determine if
recommendations are consistent with WQM plans.
3. Coordinate with Regional 201 project officers for determination
of schedules for dealing with deficiencies noted during the
review process.
4. Arrange for reanalysis and/or work program development for basic
WQM issues such as wasteload allocations or NPS analyses, including
use of available funding resources (201,106, 205(g), 314, State
funds, etc.).
1 Ql
-------
5. Provide written analysis of situations where Task Force Recommendations
may be dealt with by direct Headquarters assistance.
6. Regularly analyze reports and milestones for confirmation that
the quality of outputs is high.
7. Coordinate with Headquarters staff in the OWPO Facility Requirements
Division to ensure that improvements in the WQM program are consistent
with and are made a part of the 201 AWT project review and PRM guidance.
102
-------
Objective III.
Participate in the resolution of 201-208 issues including the optimum
use of 201 grant money and other funding sources for ongoing integration of
point source/municipal facilities elements into the WQM program. This
objective will emphasize refining and updating all aspects of the continuing
WQM role in the 201 program, including NPS, AWT, regionalization, and manage-
ment agency considerations.
General Approach
Many activities are expected throughout FY 80 to resolve joint policy issues
between the 201 and 208 programs. Because some WQM plans are not yet fully
approved for 201 control needs, some 208 activity will persist. But as 208
plans are approved, the shift from planning to operations and predominant 201
support will take effect.
FY 80 is a transition year from planning to implementation during which resolution
of joint issues will be stressed. Point source wastewater control needs should
be well into implementation, and primary emphasis on nonpoint source control
needs will be stressed in 208 in FY 80 and beyond. The scope of this new emphases
will be reflected in the WQM Needs Survey report expected at mid-year. The
most difficult job during this transition will be to integrate 201 and 208
needs without delaying implementation by abruptly changing or inactivating point
source control efforts.
Some basic adjustments may arise out of the WQM Needs Survey. A number of
conceptual and administrative tasks to provide guidance and policy during this
adjustment period will be needed. Perhaps the most important aspect of these
103
-------
tasks will be making funding arrangements, often from diverse sources, to
accomplish the objectives of EPA's WQM policies related to municipal point
sources.
This Section will work through the existing Division and Headquarters
structure to coordinate and integrate this funding policy into the overall
program strategy. Full use of financial experts such as FMAP consultants and
the input of Headquarters and Regional managers will be sought during policy and
strategy development. Maximum involvement of the 1981 SEA and five year strategy
development processes will be sought.
At the end of the year, revised policy on the continuing role of WQM in operational
201 programs and the financial means of implementing this policy is expected.
Tasks for Objective III
1. Work with OWPS and OWPO staff to prepare discussion papers, assessments
and preliminary drafts.
2. Draft policy on 201-208 integration and circulate within Headquarters.
3. Draft policy on funding packages for use of 106, 205(g), and 201
resources for WQM activities for municipal point sources. Consider
need for future 208 funding in this area.
4. Transmit draft guidance and policy to Regions for comment.
5. Review comments and revise guidance.
6. Provide inputs on policy integration for the FY 81 SEA/5 year
strategy.
7. Transmit final operational and funding policy on 201-208 issues.
104
-------
TASK SCHEDULE
FY 80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
B. New Technical, Financial, & Managerial Assistance
1. Coordinate overall project needs
Review new requests
Screen candidate
Arrange TA implementation
Workplan development
Prepare work assignments
2. Arrange additional assistance
3. FMAP interface
4. Refine program
5. Scrutinize workplan
6. integrate into Branch activities
C. Track Progress
1. Analyze interim outputs
2. Evaluate progress reports
3. Coordinate progress with Regions
-------
TASK SCHEDULE
FY 80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
C. Track Progress (GOUT.)
4. Coordinate projects outputs at Hqs.
5. Prepare quaterly reports
6. Prepare new policy & guidance
7. Disseminate information
D. Follow-up on Task Force Activity
1. Assess TF recommendations
2. Coordinate WQM Plans
3. 201 Coordination
4. Assist joint reanalyses
5. Prepare reports
6. Project feedback
7. Integrate 201/201 programs
Objective: Resolve 201-208 policy/
funding issues
1. Develop drafts
^
2. Circulate drafts
3. Revise policy
4. Integrate policy
5. Finalize Branch position
-------
TASK SCHEDULE
FY 80
123456789 10 11 12
Objective: Continue participation
on AWT Task Force
1. Attend TF meetings
2. Contact Regions
3. Coordinate with OWPS
4. Prepare comments
5. Review interim Tf decisions
6. Prepare reports
7. Coordinate NPS policy
Objective: Synthesize NPS/AWT
Interface ana Develop Policy
A. New Policy Development
1. Coordinate new policy internally
2. Prepare policy
3. Attend project meetings
4. Prepare presentations
5. Coordinate with Hq. Task Force
6. External coordination
-------
1978-1983 WORK PLAN
FOR THE
$
I
. UJ
(3
NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM
November, 1978
Water Planning Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
108
-------
CONTENTS
Section I - INTRODUCTION
Section II - PROBLEM STATEMENT
Section III - NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM
Objectives
Strategy
Approach
Prototype Projects
Schedule
Resource Requirements
Appendix - TASK DESCRIPTIONS
Appendix - WORK ELEMENT DESCRIPTIONS
4
4
5
&
8
10
10
13
23
109
-------
Section I
INTRODUCTION
The treatment of municipal and industrial wastes has significantly
reduced the quantities of pollutants which enter our nation's receiving
waters. However, it is becoming clear that water quality goals will not
be met in some areas unless nonpoint sources are controlled also. More
specifically, urban runoff has been identified as a major source of
water pollution problems in many areas. This document summarizes the
current status of knowledge regarding urban runoff problems and des-
cribes a program for providing the information necessary to plan and
effect control.
Over the past decade, studies by EPA and others have examined the
concept that storm runoff may be a major pathway through which pollutants
are carried to receiving waters. During the last two years, studies
conducted as part of 208 planning programs have verified this concept
in numerous locations, nationwide. However, Congress, in its last round
of Clean Water Act Amendments , provided funds only for problem assessment
and planning. No implementation funds were allocated, because it was
felt that the current state of technical knowledge is insufficient to
justify large-scale action. That assesment was accurate in that there
are important information deficiencies regarding pollutant sources, areal
accumulation patterns, washoff and transport mechanisms, instream be-
havior of the pollutants, and control effectiveness. In fact, not enough
is known about the practical implications of the resulting impacts on
water quality and aquatic ecosystems.
The program described herein is directed toward reviewing what is
known about urban runoff mechanisms , problems , and controls and present-
ing a holistic view of the current state of the art and a strategy for
action. This will be presented in a way that will provide EPA, local
decision makers, and interested citizens with a rational basis for assess-
ing urban runoff problems, postulating realistic control options, and
developing plans consistent with local needs. The program will culminate
with a report to Congress in 1983 and will continue thereafter to assure
implementation. The following sections desribe the major problems asso-
ciated with urban runoff planning and the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program
(NURP) which is intended to solve those problems. It includes a discus-
sion of the program's objectives, strategy, approach, outputs, schedule,
and estimated requirements for funds and personnel.
iWQ
-------
Section II
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Many 208 studies began with the assumption that urban runoff was
an important cause of water quality problems. Although the studies have
progressed and much information on runoff and receiving waters has been
developed, it is still difficult to assess urban runoff's role as a
major cause of problems. That is partly because of interferences by
other sources and complex relationships within the receiving waters.
But it is also because of difficulties in deciding what constitutes
a "problem". In some cases, "problems" are synonymous with standards
violations; in others, "problems" are synonymous with an impairment
or denial of beneficial uses.
The practical implication of these differences of opinion is that
local agencies are very reluctant to make commitments to implementing
controls, in the absence of clear problem definition.
Another major obstacle to implementation is associated with the
uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of controls. Many of the
measures proposed for controlling urban runoff are either new or special
applications of conventional practices used for other purposes. Engi-
neers, planners, public works personnel, and other decision makers are
understandably reluctant to invest large amounts of time and money in
controls which may not perform as hoped.
Other obstacles to implementation include basic data deficiencies
on sources, transport, mechanisms, and receiving water characteristics
(hydrologic and water quality aspects). Table 1 summarizes some of the
more important topic areas where knowledge is lacking.
What is needed is a program which will fill in these and other
information gaps, synthesize (and communicate) what is known at the
present state of the art, and help resolve the uncertainties over pro-
blem definition. The Nationwide Urban Runoff Program is directed toward
this end.
-------
Table 1. TOPICS OF UNCERTAINTY
• Sources - not enough is known about where pollutants originate. Major sources
certainly include vehicles, vegetation, erosion, animals, and air pollution, but a
better understanding of source contributions could enhance control opportunities.
"• Washoff/transport mechanisms - not enough is known about how pollutants get
from the sources to the receiving waters. Models for simulating runoff would be
more useful in problem definition and control evaluation if they could accurately
reflect washoff and transport mechanisms.
• Impacts - it is still difficult to go beyond speculation in assigning urban runoff
its proper share of responsibility for pollution problems, where other sources also
contribute. In cases where other sources create obvious problems, it is difficult
to determine the appropriate level of control for urban runoff.
• Relative benefits - local planners have difficulty deciding whether the various
benefits of controlling urban runoff quality justify the costs involved. There is
considerable controversy over the present dry weather standards' relationship to
beneficial uses, given the time and space scales of storm events. Many plans fail
to be implemented because of uncertainties regarding: How much control is
enough? Who benefits? Who should pay? Who should decide?
• Controls - some of the control measures cited in typical 208 plans are plausible
candidates, but their application for the purpose of water pollution control has
not been studied quantitatively. Soth cost and effectiveness data on full-scale
programs are lacking.
-------
Section III
NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES
The ultimate objective of the program is to conduct an assessment
of urban runoff on a nationwide scale and present the findings in a
report to Congress in 1983. The report will describe:
• the nature of urban runoff problems where signi-
ficant problems have been identified
• the causes of these problems (e.g., sources, trans-
port modes, impact mechanisms)
• the severity of these problems, based on considera-
tion of beneficial uses and water quality standards
• opportunities for controlling urban runoff problems,
including descriptions of control measures, their
effectiveness, costs, and strategies for broad-scale
implementation.
Ancillary program objectives will be:
• to develop the information base required to assess
urban runoff problems and mechanisms.
• to examine the adequacy of current dry-weather water
quality standards when used to judge the signifi-
cance of storm-dominated pollution problems.
• to support related programs within EPA
and other agencies.
• to support the Regions and program parti-
cipants at the state, areawide, and local level.
• to develop the information base required to identify,
assess, and implement effective controls.
113
-------
STRATEGY
The Nationwide Urban Runoff Program involves selecting a limited
number of locations for intensive data gathering and study with the
purpose of:
• meeting program objectives
• developing implementation plans for those areas
* demonstrating transferability, so that solutions
and knowledge gained can be applied in other areas
(without the need for intensive data gathering
efforts)
Approximately thirty such studies will be conducted nationwide, with
some pairing in order to demonstrate transf erability and the need to
cover a wide range of climatic and hydrologic regimes. The first projects
selected are those with obvious problems (e.g., beach closures, impacted
water supplies, impacts on aquatic life).
The strategy calls for providing a full range of technical and management
assistance to each project (as the needs arise) and for communication
of experiences, sharing of data, and transfer of lessons learned on
a timely basis. Under the strategy, the roles and responsibilities
of all involved participants will be clearly defined and communicated
at the outset and will be reviewed and revised where warranted as the
project progresses.
The strategy recognizes the need for program coordination, both within
and outside of the Agency, to maximize the use of linited resources
and minimize conflict and overlap. The apropriate nature and degree
of coordination is yet to be established, but typical areas include
toxic subtances control, drinking water supply problems, combined sewer
overflows, residuals management, air pollution impacts, etc.
As the program gains momentum and information is generated, mechanisms
will be implemented to insure that the information gained is communicated
to local governmental officials. An important activity will be to
involve the relevant segment of the public so they become acquainted
with the program and its benefits and costs, and so they can provide in-
puts to decisions required at the local level.
114
-------
APPROACH
The objectives of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program will be
achieved by accomplishing the ten tasks whose relationship is shown
below. The end product of the program is the assessment of urban
runoff on a nationwide basis (i.e., from problem definition through
control'planning) and the resultant report' to Congress. The Prototype
Projects conducted with the Regions will provide the vehicle for devel-
oping information, insights, and perspective.
7. Project
Monitoring/
Coordination
1. Program Development
2. Program Management
3. 208 Uroan Runoff Status Deveiopment
4. Agency Coordination
5. Prototype Project Selection
6. Work Plan Development
PROTOTYPE PROJECTS
CONDUCTED IN REGIONS
9. Program Assessment and Evaluation
Technical/
Management
Assistance
NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT AND
REPORT TO CONGRESS
Although the tasks referred to here are to be performed by the
Water Planning Division staff assigned to the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program (supported by consultants as needed), substantial participation
by the Regions is recognized as being essential. It is anticipated that
the Regions will contribute in the selection of prototype projects,
coordination with grantees, and provision of administrative support.
Tasks 1 through 4 are the effort required to establish the program.
Tasks 5 and 6 are associated with initiating the Prototype Projects.
Tasks 7 and 8 are the on-going efforts required to support the Regions
and grantees who conduct the projects. In Task 9, the knowledge gained
will be synthesized to yield the products of Task 10. Table 2 summarizes
the work elements which make up these ten tasks. Additional detail is
presented in the Appendix.
115
-------
Table 2. TASKS COMPRISING THE NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM
1. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT:
• Define objectives for NURP.
• Develop strategy.
• Develop Program Execution Plan.
• Coordinate with Regions.
• Estimate resource requirements.
• Obtain contractual support.
2. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:
• Prepare and maintain Program Management Notebook.
• Prepare and maintain Master Plan.
• Prepare and maintain Staffing Plan.
• Prepare Program Budget Requests.
' Provide ad hoc briefings to higher authorities.
• Manage headquarters-level contracts.
3. 208 URBAN RUNOFF STATUS DETERMINATION:
* Collect basic information.
• Prepare 208 pre-screening checklist.
• Visit Regions, review urban runoff portions of
WQM plans.
• Prepare summary reports.
4, AGENCY PROGRAM COORDINATION:
* Coordinate with other EPA offices:
- Office of Water Planning and Standards
- Office of Water Programs Operation
- Office of Toxic Substances
- Office of Enforcement
- Office of Solid Waste
- Office of Research and Development
- Office of Air. Noise, and Radiation
5. PROTOTYPE PROJECT SELECTION:
• Develop project selection criteria.
* Support Regions' project solicitation processes.
• Pre-screen potential grantees.
• Support preparation of grant applications.
• Participate in final selection process.
6. WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT:
• Receive requests for technical assistance.
• Prepare model work plan.
• Review initial work plan drafts.
• Provide comments and guidance for revising and
completing final work plans.
• Meet with Regions, states, and areawide and
local WQM agency representatives as required.
7. TECHNICAL/MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE:
• Provide on-site technical assistance to projects.
• Establish data collection quality assurance protocol,
• Provide training for Regions, states, and areawide and
local WQM agencies.
• Provide project management assistance to Project
Officers in Regions.
8. PROJECT MONITORING/COORDINATION:
• Review and comment on progress reports.
• Attend project status briefings.
• Prepare and distribute Program Newtlenen.
• Provide information clearinghouse function.
• Maintain Prototype Project Status File.
• Establish Program Steering Committee, chair meetings.
• Provide program policy and guidance.
9. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION:
• Analyze information developed in preceding tasks to
identify and assess major trends and cause-and-effect
relationships.
• Analyze available information to determine its
relationship to policy issues (including legal,
institutional, and financial implications).
• Assess the practical applicability of effective control
measures.
10. NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT AND REPORT TO CONGRESS:
• Review quarterly and annual 208 reports.
• Summarize information on problem identification.
• Summarize causa-and-effect relationships, resource
needs, and cost-effectiveness of control alternatives.
• Summarize institutional, legal, and financial aspects.
• Document urban runoff problems, effectiveness of
controls, and cost of implementation.
• Synthesize a Nationwide Urban Runoff Control Program.
• Prepare report to Congress.
116
-------
PROTOTYPE PROJECTS
The Prototype Projects provide a means for obtaining information
essential to developing a nationwide perspective and will simultaneously
provide Regions, states, and 208 agencies with site-specific information
they need for planning and decision making. Projects will be conducted
in all Regions during the course of the program. The projects which
have been identified for the first round (i.e., 1978-1979 funding) are
described briefly in Table 3.
The prototype projects will vary considerably in scope and focus.
Attempts will be made to allocate the funds approximately in proportion
to need. As a first approximation, the "need" of each each Region was
defined in terms of a rough index which was obtained by computing the
product of population and annual runoff. Those regions with large
populations and high runoff were assumed to be more likely to have ur-
ban runoff problems; sparsely populated arid regions less likely. The
results of such computations are charted below along with a chart showing
the preliminary allocation of funds among the Regions.
Index of Need in Region
f (population, runoff volume)
Allocation of Funds to
Prototype Projects
VIII
COMPARISON OF NEED VERSUS FUNDING ALLOCATION
-------
Table 3. SUMMARY OF PROTOTYPE PROJECTS
PROJZCT R2CEIVLNC
REGION LOCATION HAZE* TfTi
I. Massachusetts
11. Middlesex, HJ river/estuary
Nassau/Suffolk, W! jrotmduater
III. aaltiaore, HE river
IV. Waccamav, SC ocean
Taapa/St. Petersburg, FL river
Winston— Salem, KC river/lake
V. N1PC, G stress
H?A, IX. river
SDSCOa, XI river/lakes
Ann AZbor, KI
Lansing, KI river
SBrtPC, VI lake
"I, Houston, "3
711. Kansas City, MO river
St. Louis, MO river/ lake
Till. Denver, CO stress
IX. Castro Valley, CA creek
£. Sellevue, -A creeks
FOCUS OF
STTO1
-
recreatioa,
industry,
violations
veter supply
aesthetics.
recreation,
standards
viola tioas
-
standards
violations
fishery impacts,
s tsodards
violations
standards
violations
eytrophicstlon,
standards
violations
-
recreation,
fishery impacts,
-
-
-
fishery iapacts,
aesthetics
iapacts
MAJOR
POLLUTANTS
-
bacteria,
toxics
toxics
toxics
bacteria,
oxygen
demand
bacteria,
toxics
-
bacteria,
toxics,
demand
oxygen
bacteria,
coxics ,
oxygen
demand
toxics
sediments ,
bacteria,
mitleata
-
becteria,
toxics ,
-
-
••
-
™
sediments,
heavy aetals
sealments,
coxics ,
oil i grease
CavntOL ?R£CI?ITAIIOK
?£EASLTl£S AtiC LAKDFOBH
-
-
percolation through
soil aaatle,
street sueepisg
sedimentation basin,
street suvepiag,
catchbasin cleaning
outfalls , rediversion
disinfection,
ordiaaoce eaforceaeat
-
detention basins,
source Identification
street suMplag
detention basins
-
detention basins
(above and below
gride)
-
-
-
-
*
street suvepicg,
tatcabeslns
ordinances ,
street sweeping,
tot: structural
45 ia/yr
45 ia/yr
pieaaouc
45 ia/yr
coastal
*5 Ia/yr
piedmont
50 ia/yr
coastal
55 Ia/yr
coastal
45 In/yr
piedmont
35 ia/yr
plains
35 ia/yr
plains
30 la/yr
plains
30 ia/yr
plains
30 in/yr
plaias
30 ia/yr
plains
'5 in/yr
plaias
35 ia/yr
plains
40 ia/yr
plaias
15 in/ yr
mountains,
n] a j ftm
20 ia/yr
footaills
35 ia/yr
STtror
AREA SIZI
-
large river bM:
»a*ll suecateta
aedim basin
medium, Uaear
watershed
-
small, dtOM,
urban catctaet
small, denst,
urban cateam
small, denst,
urban eatciau
saall, develop!
basin
Small, urban
basic
-
-
-
-
aedius, it"
small, •**'•'•
118
-------
SCHEDULE
The Nationwide Urban Runoff Program is planned to extend over a period
of five years, yielding its major output in late 1983 (i.e., the nation-
wide assessnent and report to Congress). However, the program is designed
such that there will be numerous other outputs at various times as
indicated in the following figures.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
The Nationwide Urban Runoff Program described here will require
an estimated 22 person-years effort and $30 million over its five year
duration. Most of the effort will be by EPA Headquarters (17 person-years).
The prototype projects (approximately 30 in all) will require an esti-
mated $29 million, about $6 million of which is allocated to the first-
round of 19 projects (see Table 4). The consulting group will require
an additional $600,000 in contract funds. Travel over the five years
will cost approximately $300,000 (consisting of about $42,000 for Head-
quart ers, $1000 for Regional personnel, and $50,000 per year for the
consulting group) . It is anticipated that the development of wet-weather
flow criteria methodology will require an additional $75,000.
119
10
-------
Program Development
Program Management
208 Uroan Runoff
Agency Program Coordination
Prototype Project Selection
Work Plan Development
Technical and
Project Monitoring
Program Assessment
Nationwide Assessment and
Calendar Years
1978 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 . 1982
M-2
1 I
^•x^i
! I
! * 4
* 4
1 1
I 1
n ii MI i
ji:2 fv-Jj |r-;J, •-::;:- ••;-:::-".': --*\
A* Arnu*i c«ooa outpvt
SCHEDULE FOR OVERALL PROGRAM
Program Management
Prototype Project Selection
Work Plan Development
Agency Program Coordination
and Coordination
Program Assessment
Technicai Management
and Assistance
SONDJ FMAMJ J A1
|si< , • • .- ...-••'•••:• ..-. ' ' .•...-"-.•/•;::•.. :.•: .•.;••••:• V :.-.•:•-.".•:>•••:•.-.:,. ..'•••: • •'• ':
j-V* '• • - •'- • ' • • • ••-•• .''.'- ••••-.-....•••-.--• -••:'•-•-•...• . - ' . .-.- • ' . - -- . -.-:-• ••-;..--- .. - . . .-.-.;.-. -
Connoif te Dfoararn
itrat«qy statement
f ' ••' 51
I- . ..*!
initiate fif^t
'OuncJ protect!
f." •"• - -- -...'- .,:••- • - -%.
/-
*0r first rounfl orotectl
[•*•••-.
Imtuate coooerauve orogram
vyirn U.S. Geoiogtcat Survey
JO:.-:/ •' : :.. : — A Q Q (
Suomit status
reooa
I,.....'.... i-"- -
Q-
3 0
2 *!
Suotrnt inrxiai
reoO't
i
auartvrw '*ooai
SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1979
11
120
-------
TABLE 4. STATUS AND FUNDING OF PROTOTYPE PROJECTS
PROJECT
LOCATION
STATUS AS 07
OCTOBER 1978
l.
Massachusetts
proposal
due 9/78
II.
Hiddletex, NJ
folk., NY
potential
project 1/79
potential
project 1/79
III. Baltimore, MD
work plan in
preparation
IV. Waccimaw, SC
Tampa/St. Petersburg, FL
Wiaston-Salem, NC
project
b«gan 8/78
project
began 8/78
work plan in
preparation
7.
S1?C, E.
EPA, IL
SEMCOC, XL
Ann Arbor, Sfl
Lansing , MI
SEVKPC, «~
project
selected
project
selected
project
selected
to be designated
project
selected
project
selected
VI. Houston, TX
to be designated
711. Kansas City, MO
St. Louis, MO
potential
project 1/79
proposal due
10/78
VII1. Denver CO
potential
project
IX. Castro Valley, CA
X. Seilevue, WA
pilot project
pilot project
12
121
-------
Appenc
Task Descriptor
122
-------
Task 1. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Objective: To develop clearly stated program objectives, a well-
founded strategy, and an implementable execution plan
for the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program
Work Elements; Define objectives for NURP (11/77 to 3/78)
Develop strategy (1/78 to 8/78)
Develop Program Execution Plan (1/78 to 8/78)
Coordinate with Regions (2/78 to 7/78)
Estimate resource requirements (7/78 to 8/78)
Obtain contractual support (3/77 to 3/78)
Description:
Products:
An initial draft of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program
Plan will be prepared and (following Headquarters re-
view) sent to the Regions for review and comment. Meet-
ings will be held in each Regional Office to discuss the
proposed program, answer questions, and receive comments
(especially on the program objectives, nationwide stra-
tegy, and roles and responsibilities of the team parti-
cipants) . Following this round of Regional visits, com-
ments received and insights gained will be used to pre-
pare a refined program strategy and execution plan. Based
upon this, a refined estimate of resource requirements
will be prepared.
_ Nationwide Program Strategy
Program Execution Plan
Resource requirements estimate
Resource Requirements; P ~ yc travel
Headquarters:
Regions:
.72
$ 0
13
123
-------
Task 2. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Objective:
Work Elements:
Description:
To assure that the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program is
well managed through completion.
Prepare and maintain Program Management Notebook (4/78
to completion of program)
Prepare and maintain Master Plan (7/78 to 9/78 to pre-
pare, will be maintained throughout the program.)
Prepare and maintain Staffing Plan (8/78 to 9/78)
Provide Program Budget Requests (6/79 to completion of
program; to be done annually)
Provide ad hoc briefings to higher authorities (initiated
upon request)
Manage Headquarters-level contracts (3/78 to 3/80)
The initial Program Management Notebook, Program Master
Plan, Program Budget Request, and Staffing Plan will
be prepared, using the Nationwide Strategy and Program
Execution Plan developed during Task 1. These will be
updated and maintained throughout the duration of the
program. The maintenance of program management docu-
mentation will facilitate the ad hoc status brief ings to
higher authorities and others. The Program Manager will
serve as Project Officer on Headquarters-level contracts.
Products: Current Program Management and Notebook
Current Program Master Plan
Current Program Staffing Plan
Resource Requirements: p - yr travel
Headquarters: 1.23
Regions: 0
$ 0
3 0
-------
Task 3. 208 URBAN RUNOFF STATUS DETERMINATION
Objectives;
To assemble and document information on the status of
the urban runoff portion of the WQM plans. To estab-
lish the basis upon which to develop the NURP. To
identify potential Prototype Project areas.
Work Elements; Collect basic information. (.10/77 to 2/78)
Prepare 208 Pre-screening Checklist (2/78)
Visit each Region to review urban runoff portion of WQM
plans (3/78 to 6/78)
Description;
Prepare Summary Reports (5/78 to 8/78)
Using "Profile" information, a first assessment of the
extent of urban runoff problems will be made. Meetings
will be held in each region with WQM Branch Chiefs, Sec-
tion Chiefs, Project Officers, WQM and NPS coordinators,
and technical support staff. Regional 208 Project Offi-
cers will be asked to complete a Pre-screening Checklist.
The current status of 208 urban runoff studies will
be discussed with regional staff. The 208 projects which
show potential for further work will be selected fron
Pre-screening Checklists and discussed with the Project
Officers. Reports summarizing discussions with Region-
al staffs and information learned from Pre-screening
Checklists will be prepared, and a list of potential
Prototype Projects will be developed.
Products: Pre-screening Checklist
Report summarizing Checklists
Report summarizing Regional visits
List of potential Prototype Projects
Resource Requirements: _p - yr travel
Headquarters:
Regions:
1.10 S9300
.97 $ 0
125
-------
Task 4. AGENCY PROGRAM COORDINATION
Objective:
To provide information for other Agency programs and
obtain support for NURP.
Work Elements; Coordinate with other EPA offices:
Office of Water Planning and Standards (10/78 to 1/80)
Office of Water Programs Operation (10/78 to completion
of program)
Office of Toxic Substances (1/79 to completion of program)
Office of Enforcement (10/78 to completion of program)
Office of Solid Waste (1/80 to completion of program)
Office of Research and Development (8/79 to comple-
tion of program)
Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation (1/79 to completion
of program)
Description:
Products:
Wet-weather flow criteria nust be developed through
an effort involving the Water Quality Standards Cri-
teria Division and the NURP. Step One grants for combined
sewer projects in Prototype Project areas should be joint-
ly developed with this program. NURP will assess the
magnitude and extent of the toxic contribution to water
pollution and may identify sources of toxic material
of which OTS may need to be aware. The NPDES and General
Permit programs will need information from the NURP
to write meaningful permits. The residuals generated
by some BMP's will create demands for disposal space
and must be considered in solid waste management plans.
NURP can also provide information regarding needs for
research and development.
None
Resource Requirements:
Headquarters:
Regions:
p - yr
1.10
0
travel
$ 0
$ o
126
-------
Task 5. PROTOTYPE PROJECT SELECTION
Objective; To select (from 208 areawide and statewide agencies
willing to participate) appropriate Prototype Projects
to assure that overall program objectives can be met.
Work Elements; Develop project selection criteria (3/78 to 7/78)
Support Regions' project solicitation processes (7/78
to 7/79)
Pre-screen potential grantees (7/78 to 7/79)
Support preparation of grant applications (8/78 to 8/79)
Participate in final selection process (7/78 to 9/79)
Description;
Products:
Criteria for selecting Prototype Projects will be dis-
cused in meetings at each Regional office, and inputs
to the final selection process will be requested. Follow-
ing the round of Regional visits, a selection criteria
guideline document will be prepared. Support to the
Regional solicitation process will be provided on request
(probably in the form of program presentations and on-site
visits). Potential grantees will be pre-screened to
avoid duplication of effort or inappropriate activities.
Grant application support will be provided (on request),
ranging fron review and comment on draft material to
on-site technical or managerial consultation. Final
selection of Prototype Projects will be made in consul-
tation with Regional staff.
Designation of Prototype Projects
Resource Requirements; p- yr travel
Headquarters: .72 $10,000
Regions: -60 $ 0
17
127
-------
Task 6. WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT
Objectives; To assure comparability in the emerging information
base. To achieve a uniform approach toward the de-
velopment of water quality management plans. To as-
sure that woi.k plans are developed around local, Re-
gional, and national needs.
Work Elements; Receive requests for technical assistance (8/78 to 7/82)
Prepare a model work plan (8/78 to 9/78)
Review initial work plan drafts (8/78 to 3/79)
Provide comments and guidance for revising and completing
final work plans (8/78 to 5/79)
Meet with Regions, States, and areawlde and local WQM
agency representatives as required (1/79 to 8/81)
Description:
Products:
Selection of Prototype Projects will be based on needs.
Work plan development will be guided by Headquarters by
sending teams when requested. It is envisioned tfiat
teams consisting of one person from Headquarters and
two consultants ( each consultant having a different area
of expertise) will (after selection of the Prototype
Project) review initial work plans, provide comments
and guidance, visit Prototype Project, areas (when re-
quested), and help write final work plans.
Model work plan
Prototype Project work plans
Resource Requirements: p - yr travel
.48 $9500
.26 $ 0
Headquarters:
Regions:
18
128
-------
Task 7. TECHNICAL/MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
Objectives:
Work Elements:
Description;
Products:
To provide technical and management assistance with
which to extend Regional, Statewide, areawide, and local
capabilities in developing and implementing WQM plans.
To assure comparability in the emerging information base.
Provide on-site technical assistance to projects (8/78
to 9/81)
Establish quality assurance protocol for data collec-
tion (6/78 to 8/78)
Provide training for Regions, States, and areawide and
local WQM agencies (8/78 to completion of program)
Provide project management assistance to Project Of-
ficers in Regions
Initiate a public participation program (8/78-9/82)
Technical and management assistance in the form of on-
site help in all technical areas will be provided to
the Regions and Prototype Projects by Headquarters.
Training will be provided to Regional, State, areawide,
and local WQM Agency staff s. All assistance and training
will be provided upon request. Protocol for quality
assurance will be developed to provide guidelines (con-
sistent with supporting agencies such as the U.S. Geologi-
cal Survey) with which to develop high quality, compar-
able information.
Quality assurance protocol
Technical/management assistance
Resource Requirements: P ~ yr travel
Headquarters: .94 $6000
Regions: .85 $1000
19
129
-------
Task 8. PROJECT MONITORING / COORDINATION
Objective:
Work Elements:
Description:
Products:
To provide a nationwide overview and assure that pro-
gram objectives are being met in each Prototype Project.
Review and comment on progress reports (10/78 to 9/81)
Attend project status briefings (8/78 to 9/81)
Prepare and distribute Program Newsletters (11/78 to
9/81)
Provide information clearinghouse function (8/78 to com-
pletion of program)
Maintain Prototype Project Status File (8/78 to com-
pletion of program)
Establish Program Steering Committee; chair meetings
(9/78 to completion of program)
Provide program policy and guidance (8/78 to comple-
tion of program)
This task will provide overview and control to assure
that program goals are met. Quarterly reports will be
provided so that Regional Project Officers and Head-
quarters coordinators will be able make minor adjust-
ments of the direction of projects. Annual reports
'•will be used to evaluate projects' merit for the following
year's funding. A quarterly newsletter will be used
to keep program participants informed as to the pro-
jects' status and any new information which may be help-
ful. A project status file will be kept current. Head-
quarters will form and chair a program Steering Committee
composed of members from EPA, the States, and local
users. The committee will provide review, direction,
and guidance to the NURP. Program policy on such matters
as financial, institutional, and legal issues will be
dealt with by other Branches within the Water Planning
Division.
Quarterly newsletter
Bulletins on recent developments
Project Status File
Program Steering Committee
Program policy and guidance
Resource Requirements:
Headquarters:
Regions:
p - yr
2.65
1.85
travel
S/700
siooo
20
130
-------
Task 9. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION
Objective;
Work Elements:
Description:
To gain an accurate perspective of the degree to which
urban runoff is a problem of national importance and
assess the implications of various control strategies.
Analyze information developed in preceding tasks to
identify and assess major trends and cause-and-effect
relationships (11/78 to 9/82)
Analyze available information to determine its rela-
tionship to policy issues (including legal, institu-
tional, and financial implications) (1/81 to 1/82)
Assess the practical applicability of effective control
measures (9/81 to 3/82)
Assess public support for implementing urban runoff
controls.
This task consists largely of an effort to synthesize
what is learned from the program to date. It will involve
a review of the various memoranda, reports, and other
file materials developed during the program. The effort
will focus on identifying ways in which the findings
of this program indicate needs for policy changes or
reconsideration.
This task will assess the ways in which urban control
will interface with established policy and their legal,
institutional, financial, and/or environmental implica-
tions. The importance of urban runoff as a nationwide
problem is defined in terms of water quality standards
and policies regarding beneficial use. The legal basis
for requiring control involves policy considerations.
The responsibility for implementing controls and their
funding both involve policy considerations. At the local
level, some of the more cost-effective controls will
involve careful considerations of (and possibly amend-
ments of) public policy.
The task will also involve an assessment of the costs
and effectiveness of various candidate control measures
and their financial, social, and environmental impli-
cations. Effectiveness will be expressed in terms of
the measures' ability to practicably reduce impacts on
water quality.
Products: Various inputs to Task 10
Resource Requirements: P ~ 1
Headquarters:
Regions:
2.50
.38
travel
S 0
S 0
21
r.U
-------
Task 10. NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT AND REPORT TO CONGRESS
Objectives: To provide a nationwide assessment of NURP results, data
transferability, and implications for problem solution
across the country. To prepare a report to Congress
showing where urban runoff problems exist, the degree of
severity, and estimated cost for correction on a regional
and national basis.
Work Elements; Review quarterly and annual 208 reports (10/79 to 12/81)
Summarize information on problem identification (10/79
to 9/82)
Summarize cause-and-ef f ect relationships, resource needs ,
and cost effectiveness of control alternatives (10/79
to 9/82)
Summarize institutional, legal, and financial aspects
(10/79 to 9/81)
Document urban runoff problems, effectiveness of con-
trols, and cost of implementation (12/80 to 12/81)
Synthesize a Nationwide Urban Runoff Control Program
(12/81 to 12/82)
Description:
Prepare report to Congress (12/81 to late 1982)
Progress reports from the Prototype Projects and other
applicable urban runoff information will be reviewed
from a nationwide perspective. Summary reports will
be prepared. They will contain cause-and-effeet data,
and control effectiveness and costs, and address in-
stitutional, legal, and financial aspects. A Nation-
wide Urban Runoff Control Program will be developed and
summarized in a report to Congress.
Products; Annual NURP summar.y reports
Nationwide Urban Runoff Control Program Plan
Report to Congress
Resource Requirements: p - yr travel
Headquarters: 6.45 $ 0
Regions: 0 $ 0
132
-------
Appenc
Work Element Description
-------
WORK ELEMENT Ib - DEVELOP STRATEGY
METHOD:
A draft nationwide strategy for the program will be developed
at Headquarters, based upon inputs from Work Elements la and 3a,
as well as other sources. It will be sent to the Regions for re-
view and comment as an Information Memorandum. During the Regional
visits (conducted as part of Work Element 3c), the proposed strategy
will be discussed; suggestions and Regional perspectives will be
solicited. A refined strategy will be prepared incorporating
these comments.
PRODUCT:
The strategy for the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in January 1978 and completed
in August 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Completion of this Work Element, including reviews at various agency
levels, is estimated to require approximately three person-months
of Headquarters and Regional effort, plus consultant team support.
Resource requirements (including travel) are included underwork
Element 3c.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .17 0
Regional .08 v 0
.25 0
24
134
-------
WORK ELEMENT la - DEFINE OBJECTIVES FOR NURP
METHOD:
This Work Element will consist of a thorough review of pertinent
prior Agency accomplishments in the urban runoff area, facilitated
by inputs from Work Element 3a. Based upon an assessment of the
current state of the art and needs identified by 208 agencies and
other federal activities (such as the Congressional Public Works
Committee), the objectives of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program
will be developed, reviewed, and finalized.
PRODUCT:
Clearly defined and agreed to program objectives which can be incor-
porated in the plan to be developed in Work Elements Ib and Ic.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in November 1977 and essentially
completed by March 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Completion of this Work Element, including reviews at various agency
levels, will require approximately three person-months of Head-
quarters and Regional effort, plus some consultant team support.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .17 0
Regional .08 0
.25 0
23
135
-------
WORK ELEMENT Ic - DEVELOP PROGRAM EXECUTION PLAN
METHOD:
A preliminary execution plan will be developed jointly with the
nationwide strategy of Work Element -lb and submitted to the same
review and refinement process. Based upon the results, a detailed
program execution plan (divided into Tasks and Work Elements) will
be developed.
PRODUCT:
An implementable execution plan for the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program. This will be incorporated in the Program Master Plan
developed in Work Element 2b.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in January 1978 and com-
pleted in August 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Resources required for developing the execution plan have been in-
cluded in the estimate for Work Element lb. Travel requirements
are included in Work Element 3c. Development of the final program
execution plan is estimated to require approximately two person-
months of Headquarters effort, plus consultant team support.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .17 0
Regional 0 0
.17 0
25
U6
-------
WORK ELEMENT Id - COORDINATE WITH REGIONS
METHOD:
In order to obtain Regional perspectives as well as Headquarters
viewpoints in all aspects of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program,
close coordination with the Regions will be established and main-
tained throughout the program development period. This will include
meetings and discussions (at Headquarters and in Regional offices),
dissemination of draft program documentation for review and comment
(e.g., proposed strategy, program tactics, team approach, roles
and responsibilities), and incorporation of comments into final
products.
PRODUCT:
Inclusion of Regional perspective along with Headquarters view-
points in all program development products.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in February 1978 and completed
in ;Tuly 1978.
26
137
-------
WORK ELEMENT le - ESTIMATE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
METHOD:
This Work Element will consist of reviewing the planned Work Ele-
ments and identifying their level of effort. The estimates will
be compiled into a matrix, and the rows and columns summed hori-
zontally and vertically (balancing the highs and lows).
PRODUCT:
An estimate of required resources,
SCHEDULE:
This effort will begin when the first Work Element is begun and end
with the completion of the matrix. See Work Element 2b.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
This Work Element will require 2 person-weeks effort in addition to
that identified in Work Element 2b.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .04 0
Regional 0 0
27
138
-------
WORK ELEMENT If - OBTAIN CONTRACTUAL SUPPORT
METHOD:
Prepare Request For Proposal after identifying contractual needs.
Identify tasks for consultants. Work with contracts office to
ensure timely finalization of contracting procedure.
PRODUCT;
Contractual support.
SCHEDULE;
This Work Element must be initiated no later than March 1977 to
ensure completion by March 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
It is estimated that this Work Element will require a program man-
ager to spend two person-months of effort.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .17 0
Regional 0 0
.17 0
28
13 9
-------
WORK ELEMENT 2a - PREPARE AND MAINTAIN PROGRAM MANAGEMENT NOTEBOOK
METHOD:
The outline and organization of the Program Management Notebook
will be developed, and all applicable information sources will be
collected and assembled (e.g., nationwide strategy, program exe-
cution plan, resource estimates, contractual documentation, vouch-
ers, progress reports).
PRODUCT:
A basic source of information, in notebook form, covering all
aspects of the program.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated by April 1978 and will continue
until program is completed.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
It is estimated that a program manager and consultant will need
two person-weeks to prepare and two person-weeks per year to maintain
the management notebook.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .25 0
Regional 0 0
.25 0
29
140
-------
WORK ELEMENT 2b - PREPARE AND MAINTAIN PROGRAM MASTER PLAN
METHOD;
A master plan covering all functions, tasks, and Work Elements
will be produced. This will be used for informational as well as
managerial purposes.
PRODUCT:
Master plan document. This effort will facilitate implementation
of Work Element 2c.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated July 1978, be operational by
September 1978, and continue through program completion.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Program manager and consultant will prepare the plan. It is estimated
that two person-months will be needed to prepare and two person-
weeks per year will be needed to maintain the plan over the life
of the program.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters -38 0
Regional 0 _0_
.38 0
30
HI
-------
WORK ELEMENT 2c - PREPARE AND MAINTAIN PROGRAM STAFFING PLAN
METHOD:
The Headquarters program organization and staff ing plan with per-
sonnel responsibilities will be prepared, based upon Headquarters
requirements, estimates made in the program execution plan (devel-
oped in Work Element Ic), and the availability of personnel.
PRODUCT:
A staffing plan to be used by the program manager in assigning in-
dividual work details.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated August 1978 and largely com-
pleted by September 1978.
RESOURCE REQURIEMENTS:
Program manager and consultant will prepare the document. One
person-month of effort will be required to prepare and one person-
week per year will be needed to maintain the plan over the life
of the program.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .17 0
Regional 0 0
.17 0
31
142
-------
WORK ELEMENT 2d - PREPARE PROGRAM BUDGET REQUESTS
METHOD:
Program budget requests (including travel dollars, personnel, and
contract funding) will be prepared on an annual basis for integra-
tion into the division's budget preparation process. These will be
based upon estimated future program requirements.
PRODUCT: Budget requirements for Division use.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be performed annually, beginning June 1979
and terminating with the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS;
A program manager with an assistant will require about one person-
week per year over the life of the contract.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters 0.1 0
Regional 0 _0_
0.1 0
32
-------
WORK ELEMENT 2e - PROVIDE AD HOC BRIEFINGS TO HIGHER AUTHORITIES
METHOD:
Briefing packages will be prepared on short notice, to inform
upper-level management of current status of the NURP. Depending
on the time available, packages of slides, films, speech notes, etc. ,
can be provided.
PRODUCTS:
Briefing packages.
SCHEDULE;
This Work Element will be initiated upon request.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Depending on the briefing package requested, the requirements can
range from one to three persons and consultant team support.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters to 0.1 per 0
briefing
Regional 0 __Q
to 0.1 -0
33
144
-------
WORK ELEMENT 2f - MANAGER HEADQUARTERS-LEVEL CONTRACTS
METHOD:
This Work Element will include directing the technical support to
be provided via contracts.
PRODUCT;
Technical support program.
SCHEDULE;
This Work Element is to be initiated March 1978 and terminate in
March 1980.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
A program manager will spend approximately four months full time
during a typical three-year contract.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .33 0
Regional 0 JL
.33 0
34
145
-------
WORK ELEMENT 3a - COLLECT BASIC INFORMATION
METHOD:
Basic information will be collected from the "computerized pro-
files", from work plans that have been submitted to Headquarters,
and from other reports (e.g., publications of State, local, and
professional organizations dealing with urban runoff).
PRODUCT:
This information will be used to identify needs and aid in finalizing
the urban runoff program strategy being developed in Work Element
Ib.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in November 1977 and completed
by February 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Nine person-months effort will be required, involving the program
manager, the information center, and technical specialists. No
contract funds are needed. Travel will be necessary to attend
urban runoff conferences in December 1977.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .75 $ 400
Regional 0 0
.75 $ 400
35
146
-------
WORK ELEMENT 3b - PREPARE 208 PRE-SCREENING CHECKLIST
METHOD;
A pre-screening checklist will be developed after an initial review
of the urban runoff portion of all work plans within one Regional
office. The purpose of the checklist will be to maximize the ef-
ficiency of the review team, document the current status of work
plan development, aid in identifying potential prototype projects,
and identify needs for assistance.
PRODUCTS;
Pre-screening questionnaire and checklist.
SCHEDULE;
This Work Element will be initiated during February 1978; the final
checklist is needed by March 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
One person from Headquarters , a program manager or a Regional Proj-
ect Coordinator, and the consultant team will prepare the checklist.
It is anticipated that the Regional needs will be approximately 400
person-hours (there are about 100 projects to be reviewed). No travel
is anticipated.
Travel
Headquarters .02 0
Regional .20 0
.22
36
-------
WORK ELEMENT 3c - VISIT EACH REGION TO REVIEW
URBAN RUNOFF PORTION OF WQM PLANS
METHOD:
Ten Regional meetings will be scheduled with each Region. Two
members from Headquarters and four consultants (each with a dif-
ferent area of expertise) will comprise the review team. The pro-
posed strategy will be discussed for further refinement, Project
Officers will be asked to present completed questionnaires and
checklists, and likely candidates will be reviewed and discussed
in detail.
PRODUCTS:
Completed questionnaires and checklists, information with which
to refine and finalize the strategy being developed in Work Element
Ib, and a list of potential prototype projects to facilitate execu-
tion of Work Element 5c.
SCHEDULE:
It is anticipated that the visits will be conducted between March
1978 and June 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Sixty person-days for the Headquarters team, 120 person-days for
the consultant team, and 200 person-days (20 per Region) for the
Regions will be required. Considerable travel and consultant time
will be needed.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .23 $8900
Regional .77 0
1.00 $8900
37
148
-------
WORK ELEMENT 3d - PREPARE SUMMARY REPORTS
METHOD:
Upon completion of the Regional visits, the comments of the Regions
and review team will be summarized in two reports. One report will
summarize the information gained from the pre-screening checklist;
the other will summarize the visit.
PRODUCTS:
Summary reports to be used in the initial selection of prototype
projects.
SCHEDULE:
Summary report preparation will be initiated in May 1978; reports
will be issued by August 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS;
It is anticipated that four person-weeks will be required. Head-
quarters team members will write the reports, and a member of the
consultant team will provide review.
p-Ir Travel
Headquarters .08 0
Regional' 0_ Q
.08 0
38
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4a - COORDINATE WITHIN THE OFFICE OF WATER PLANNING
AND STANDARDS
METHOD:
Coordination between the NURP and OWP&S must be developed either
through an ongoing agreement or through a liaison person. This
is necessary because the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program needs
to have wet-weather criteria to plan and implement properly. Co-
ordination of this type will take advantage of the expertise
available in the OWP&S so as to develop the criteria as efficiently
as possible.
PRODUCT:
A set of wet-weather flow criteria, for use in planning controls
and evaluating their effectiveness.
SCHEDULE:
It is anticipated that criteria will be developed by January 1980
(so the prototype projects can use them in planning).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Approximately 60 person-days will be needed by Headquarters person-
nel and/or the consultant team to develop this coordination, in
addition to the time required by OWP&S personnel.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .23 0
Regional 0 0
.23 0
39
ISO
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4b - COORDINATE WITH OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAMS OPERATION
METHOD:
Coordination will be developed between the NURP and the Office of
Water Programs Operation, either by an inter-division agreement or
by one person from the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program acting as
liaison. This coordination is necessary in order that information
gathered from the "Needs Survey" maybe used in the program, and so
that Combined Sewer program's Step-One grants (in prototype project
areas) can be jointly developed with the NURP.
PRODUCT:
A working relationship between the NURP and the Office of Water Pro-
grams Operation to ensure that efforts are not duplicated and that
relevant information in both offices is used to gain maximum output.
SCHEDULE:
This coordination will begin in October 1973 and will continue
throughout the duration of the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS;
An estimated 35 person-days effort will be expended by Nationwide
Urban Runoff Program personnel, plus effort by the Of f ice of Water
Programs Operation. Coordination will continue throughout the pro-
gram.
Headquarters
Regional
Travel
.15
40
151
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4c - COORDINATE WITH OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
METHOD:
Some of the problem constituents of urban runoff are toxic (e.g.,
heavy metals, pesticides). Some will be monitored in the Prototype
Projects. Coordination with the Office of Toxic Substances will
be necessary to prevent duplication of efforts and to benefit
from past research efforts by OTS. Coordination will take place
either by NURP personnel acting as a point of contact or by an
agreement between the two offices.
PRODUCT:
A working relationship with the Office of Toxic Substances to gain
input from them and to relay information to them.
SCHEDULE:
The initial coordination must take place by January 1979, and co-
ordination between the offices will continue throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
An estimated 40 person-days effort will be needed initially by Head-
quarters and/or the consultant team to develop the required re-
lationship. Additional time will be required to continue this
coordination.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .17 0
Regional 0 0
.17 0
41
152
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4d - COORDINATE WITH OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
METHOD;
Coordination between the NURP and the Office of Enforcement is
necessary to ensure that appropriate permits (e.g., General Per-
mits or NPDES) will be prepared. The information gathered in the
NURP will be useful to the Office of Enforcement, but the NURP
will also benefit from relevant information on the Prototype Pro j-
ect study areas. This coordination will come about by using one
NURP contact person or by an agreement between the offices to trans-
mit information.
PRODUCT:
Cooperation between the two of f ices that will minimize duplication
of effort and ensure that resources are used to their maximum
extent.
SCHEDULE:
Information collection will be initiated on respective prototype
areas in October 1978. Data collected by the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program, which is meaningful to the Office of Enforcement (or vice
versa), will be transmitted throughout the duration of the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Initially, approximately 20 person-days will be required by NURP
personnel to gather any information already available and to set
up the coordination program. Time will be needed throughout the
program to continue this coordination.
p-Yr Travel
Headquarters «H , ^
Regional 0 JL
.11 0
153
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4e - COORDINATE WITH OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
METHOD:
The Best Management Practices implemented in the Prototype Project
areas will generate residuals, causing a need for adequate disposal.
Accordingly, solid waste management plans must recognize this
need. The coordination needed between NURP and OSW will be de-
veloped either through a NURP point of contact or by an inter-office
agreement.
PRODUCT:
An inter-division coordination to insure that the efforts of the
NURP are not hindering the effect of the other existing programs
within the Agency.
SCHEDULE:
The element should be initiated by the time the initial projects
are underway and will continue until the final projects are com-
pleted.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
An estimated 35 person-days effort will be needed by Headquarters
personnel to develop the coordination, in addition to effort by
Office of Solid Waste personnel. Additional time will be required
to continue the coordination.
Travel
Headquarters .14 0
Regional 0 0
.14 0
43
154
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4f - COORDINATE WITH OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
METHOD;
Coordination with the Of f ice of Research and Development is neces-
sary, so that when a need for research is identified by theNURP,
OR&D can respond. Pertinent information on study findings and gaps
will be relayed by a NURP contact person.
PRODUCT:
An inter-division agreement whereby information gathered from the
NURP is transmitted to OR&D and identified needs are met.
SCHEDULE:
This element will be initiated after the Prototype Projects are well
underway (and needs are identified). Coordination will continue
until all projects are completed (possibly thereafter).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
An estimated 35 person-days effort by NURP personnel will be re-
quired to develop the coordination. Coordination must continue
throughout the duration of the projects.
p-Yr Travel
Headquarters .14 °
Regional 0 JL
.14 0
44
155
-------
WORK ELEMENT 4g - COORDINATE WITH OFFICE OF AIR, NOISE, AND RADIATION
METHOD:
Coordination with air quality programs will be effected by assign-
ing a NURP staff person as intra-agency coordinator. Because the
sources of urban pollution are clearly related to air pollution
(air being a major source), information needs to be exchanged
regarding the magnitudes of source and potential reduction through
mandates and controls.
PRODUCT:
Exchange of information.
SCHEDULE:
This element has been initiated informally. The process will be for-
malized by January 1979 and continued throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Coordination time requirements for the duration of the program is ap-
proximately 50 person-days and one trip per year to Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .20 $ 500
Regional 0 0
.20 $ 500
45
156
-------
WORK ELEMENT 5a - DEVELOP PROTOTYPE PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
METHOD:
A final selection criteria guideline document will be prepared,
based on inputs from Work Elements 3b and 3c, (following an overall
review of the state of the art of urban runoff), These criteria will
insure that program objectives will be met (including nationwide
representation and the solution of actual water quality problems).
PRODUCT:
A criteria guideline document to be used in selecting the Prototype
Projects.
SCHEDULE;
This Work Element will be initiated in March 1978 and completed
by July 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Completion of this Work Element will require two person-weeks of
Headquarters effort and assistance from consultants, in addition
to the time and travel requirements of Work Element 3c.
p-Yr Travel
Headquarters -02 °
Regional 9_ JL
.02 0
46
157
-------
WORK ELEMENT 5c - PRE-SCREEN POTENTIAL GRANTEES
METHOD:
The potential Prototype Project grantees will be screened to avoid
unwarranted duplication of effort and to ensure adequate dis-
tribution with respect to geographic locale, receiving water type,
and other factors. This will entail documenting each potential proj-
ect to be sure it is in agreement with the matrix of problems to
be solved and to meet the program's needs for information.
PRODUCT:
A list of potential Prototype Projects which will meet the overall
objectives of the program.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin in July 1978 and continue until the
selection of grantees has been completed (i.e., approximately
February 1979).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
The Headquarters-level project manager will be responsible for in-
itially screening the projects, based upon information received
from Work Elements 5b and 3c. No additional travel will be involved.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .1 0
Regional _0_ 0
.1 0
48
158
-------
WORK ELEMENT 5b - SUPPORT REGIONS' PROJECT SOLICITATION PROCESSES
METHOD:
Upon request, support will be provided to areawide or state-level
WQM agencies who wish to submit proposed Prototype Projects. Sup-
port will include explanations of the overall program goals and
visits to the project sites or agency offices.
PRODUCT:
A list of those potential Prototype Projects supported by the
respective Regions.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin July 1978 and continue until all
Prototype Projects have been selected (probably around September
1979).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Resources required for this Work Element are estimated to be 45
person-days for the Headquarters team (approximately one day for
each potential project), 45 person-days for the consultant team,
and 30 person-days for the Region. Considerable travel will be in-
volved.
p-Yr Travel
Headquarters «2
Regional -2
.4
159
-------
WORK ELEMENT 5d - SUPPORT PREPARATION OF GRANT APPLICATIONS
METHOD:
Support will be provided to potential grantees who will be applying
for Prototype Project funds. This support will range from review
and comment on the draft submittals to consultation between Head-
quarters and grant applicants.
PRODUCTS:
Completed grant applications of potential Prototype Projects to
be used in the final selection process. These applications will
include commitments of local shares (of the cost of the project)
in addition to Headquarters obligations.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin after the initial Prototype Projects
have been selected and will continue through until the selection
process has been completed.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Completion of this Work Element will require approxiamtely 45
person-days of Headquarters time, plus some consultant team support.
Travel will also be needed.
Travel
Headquarters .20 $3000
Regional .20 0
$3000
49
160
-------
WORK ELEMENT 5e - PARTICIPATE IN FINAL SELECTION PROCESS
METHOD;
Final selections of Prototype Projects will be made after the
preliminary steps of the selection process are complete (including
pre-screening of potential grantees and preparation of grant ap-
plications). These decisions will be made in consultation with
the respective Regional staffs. The projects finally selected must
meet, in aggregate, the overall objectives of the program estab-
lished in Task 1.
PRODUCTS;
Approximately thirty Prototype Projects which will help define the
extent and nature of the urban runoff problem and help determine
the approximate cost of solving the problem.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin July 1978 with the submittal of initial
project work plans and will continue until the 30 projects have been
selected. The final projects must be selected in time to leave
considerable time for compiling and assessing the results and
writing the final report to Congress. Therefore, most projects
should be finished by the end of 1981.
i
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Approximately 45 person-days will be required by both Regional and
Headquarters staff, with some consultant team support. Some travel
will be involved.
Travel
Headquarters
Regional
50 161
-------
WORK ELEMENT 6a - RECEIVE REQUESTS FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
METHOD:
After completion of Work Element 5d (or possibly in conjunction
with it), requests for assistance in developing final work plans
(for the Prototype Projects) will be received. These requests may
range from help with initial plan preparation to final review.
Requests will be answered by sending teams of consultants and
Headquarters personnel to the grantee agencies when needed.
PRODUCT:
A list of possible projects which need assistance in preparing work
plans.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated beginning with the first request
received (probably in August 1978) and will continue until the work
plans for all projects are completed.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Completion of this Work Element will require some time from both
Headquarters and the consultant team. This element is preliminary
to Work Elements 6c and 6d, and the bulk of the time required for
Task 6 is detailed in those elements. Nevertheless, approximately
15 person-days effort will be required by Headquarters.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .05 0
Regional 0 0
.05 0
51
162
-------
WORK ELEMENT 6b - PREPARE MODEL WORK PLAN
METHOD;
Using input from Work Elements 6c, 6d, and 6e, a model work plan
will be developed. The model can be used to guide grantees who
have not developed workable plans and can be used as a prototype of
future programs. The model will contain all the necessary elements
originally identified, in addition to any elements found to be lack-
ing after reviewing submitted work plans.
PRODUCT;
A model work plan containing elements necessary for the project to
be implemented.
SCHEDULE;
The model work plan will need to be developed by mid-September 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS;
Approximately 15 person-days will be needed by Headquarters and the
consultant team to develop the work plan. No travel will be involved.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters -06 0
Regional 0 _£_
.06 0
52
163
-------
WORK ELEMENT 6c - REVIEW INITIAL WORK PLAN DRAFTS
METHOD:
After initial work plans are received from each Prototype Project
grantee, teams of Headquarters personnel and members of the con-
sultant team will review them to insure that they meet requirements
of the "Proposed Work Plan Content" guidelines and reflect a quality
planning effort.
PRODUCT:
A working base for grantees to expand on.
SCHEDULE:
Review will begin with the initial submission of plans (August 1978)
and continue until each project has a sound work plan (probably
about May 1979).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS;
An estimated 30 person-days effort will be needed by Headquarters
and the consultant team to review the initial work plans. Travel will
be involved.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .11 $4500
Regional .11 0
.22 $4500
53
164
-------
WORK ELEMENT 6d - PROVIDE COMMENTS AND GUIDANCE FOR REVISING AND
COMPLETING FINAL WORK PLANS
METHOD:
After completion of Work Element 6c, it is anticipated that work
will continue in the Prototype Project areas. Comments will be
made by Headquarters and the consultant team to assist the Prototype
Project agencies in developing sound, final work plans. The com-
ments will take into consideration the status of the initial work
plan and the amount of work being done on the pro ject at that time.
PRODUCTS:
Final work plans which are consistent with program guidelines and
which are able to yield quality results.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be completed by May 1979, to" provide time
for developing work plans and completing the Prototype Projects
by August 1981.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Approximately 30 person-days will be required by the Headquarters
team.
Headquarters
Regional
.11
54
165
-------
WORK ELEMENT 7a - PROVIDE ON-SITE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO PROJECTS
METHOD:
Technical assistance will be provided in the form of on-site help
by Headquarters and the consultant team (upon request by Regions
and grantees). This assistance may range from assuring the quality
of data collection to helping with progress reports. This assist-
ance will be provided to assure that project officers and grantees
do not inadvertently waste time researching areas where expertise
may be available through Headquarters.
PRODUCT:
A system whereby project officers may solicit Headquarters to obtain
technical assistance.
SCHEDULE:
This element will be initiated beginning in August 1978 and will con-
tinue until the last request for assistance is made (probably around
September 1981).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Resources needed for this Work Element will depend on the amount of
assistance needed by the projects. The maximum effort is esti-
mated to be 90 person-days.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .34 $2,500
Regional .34 0
.68 $2,500
56
166
-------
WORK ELEMENTS 6e - MEET WITH REGIONS, STATES, AND AREAWIDE AND LOCAL
WQM AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES AS REQUIRED
METHOD:
This Work Element will be on-going throughout Work Elements 6c and
6d. However, after the final work, plans are developed, some co-
ordination may be required to assure quaxj.*" results and adherence
to the work plan. Visits to the Regional ofrx- - rr -h.- iToj
areas may be necessary.
PRODUCTS:
Output from this Work Element will be incorporated into Work Ele-
ments 6d and 6a. Final work plans will result from these meetings.
SCHEDULE:
Meetings will be initiated during revision of final work plans and
will probably be held as needed until the final Prototype Projects
are completed in August 1981.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Assistance will be provided as needed; up to 40 person-days by
Headquarters and the consultant team may be required, plus cor-
responding travel.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .15 $5,000
0
Regional
$5,000
55
167
-------
WORK ELEMENT 7b - ESTABLISH DATA COLLECTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL
METHOD:
A quality assurance protocol for data collection will be devel-
oped in the form of guidelines which will specify techniques to be
used (both in the lab and the field), along with the costs of these
techniques. The purpose of the guidelines is to assure comparability
in the emerging information base.
PRODUCT:
A quality assurance protocol to insure that credible results will be
obtained from each of the Prototype Projects.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be completed by August 1978.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
It is estimated that 10 person-days will be required of Headquarters
and the consultant team.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .04 0
Regional 0 0
.04 0
57
168
-------
WORK ELEMENT 7c - PROVIDE TRAILING FOR REGIONS, STATES, AND AREAWIDE
AND LOCAL WQM AGENCIES
METHOD:
Training sessions will be arranged for interested participants,
upon request from the Regions. This training may be in the form
of consultations, workshops, brief seminars, or other appropriate
training aids. The subjects to be covered will vary depending
on need.
PRODUCT:
A program through which Regional, State and areawide personnel
may receive training in a variety of subject areas.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated beginning in August 1978 and
will continue throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS;
It is difficult to estimate time required for this resource. Al-
though it is not known how many sessions will be required, the es-
timated maximum effort will be on the order of 30 person-days
for the program manager and/or the consultant team.
p-Yr Travel
$3,000
Regional
Headquarters
0
$3,000
58
169
-------
WORK ELEMENTS 7d - PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE TO REGIONAL
PROJECT OFFICERS
METHOD:
Management assistance will be provided to project officers (upon
request) to help in directing the Prototype Projects. This assist-
ance may range from suggestions by telephone to preparing specific
management guidelines for some projects.
PRODUCT:
Management assistance to help direct Prototype Projects.
SCHEDULE:
Assistance will be available beginning in August 1978 and continue
throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
A maximum of .20 person-years effort by Headquarters is estimated.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .20 0
Regional .15 0
.35 0
59
-------
WORK ELEMENT 7e - INITIATE A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
METHOD:
PRODUCT:
SCHEDULE:
There are three major items necessary for the NURP
public participation program. These three items are:
dissemination of information, advisory groups and im-
plementation. The dissemination of information will
involve keeping all interested parties in touch with
the program by using various media forms (news articles,
slide shows, speakers, tours of sites of evaluation).
The advisory groups will be composed of individuals that
can provide support for the" eventuality of decision
making as the project moves toward completion. This
group will be informed and have a say on what is being
done. The advisory group will also be the principal
participants in the third function. The group will be
the vehicle to provide responses to various alternative
control strategies in those areas where implementation
of stormwater controls will be needed.
A public participation program involving concerned par-
ties at various levels to facilitate implementation
of the program in future years.
Initial coordination between Program Management Branch
and the Urban Runoff Program staff will take place in
August 1978. This coordination will continue heavily un-
til all the work plans have been developed and the
mechanisms for implementing the public participation
program are in place. The coordination will continue
at a slower pace throughout the duration of the program
with ongoing monitoring and evaluation of public par-
ticipation in project areas.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Approximately 60 person-days will be needed at the Head-
quarters level with a large part of the effort being
expended in the early development of the program. Some
travel may be involved.
Headquarters:
Regions:
P-Yr
.25
.25
.50
Trgvel
S 500
siooo
S1500
171
-------
WORK ELEMENT 8a - REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROGRESS REPORTS
METHOD:
Headquarters and the consultant team will review quarterly reports
from the Prototype Projects and will recommend any necessary adjust-
ments to their month-to-month operation. Comments and recommenda-
tions will be sent to the project officers. Annual reports will be
used to evaluate each project, regarding the following year's
funding.
PRODUCTS:
Comments and recommendations to guide the project officers.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin in October 1978 and will continue until
approximately September 1981.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Approximately 360 person-days will be needed by Headquarters and the
consultant team (assuming atypical Prototype Pro ject, which would
last on the order of three years). Regional staff will prepare
the reports and make recommended changes. Travel requirements are
included under Work Element 8b.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters 1.5 0
Regional 1.5 0
3.0 0
60
17?
-------
WORK ELEMENTS 8b - ATTEND PROJECT STATUS BRIEFINGS
METHOD:
Meetings will be held so the project officers may brief Head-
quarters and the consultant team on the Prototype Projects ' status,
the problems encountered, the problem-solving approaches taken,
etc. The information gained from these meetings will be used in
Work Elements 8c, 8d, and 8e.
PRODUCT:
Information to be used in the quarterly newsletters and bulle-
tins.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin in August 1978 and will continue until
the projects are near completion (probably around September 1981).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
It is anticipated that each project will require at least two brief-
ings throughout its duration. This will amount to 60 person-days
effort by Headquarters and the consultant team. Travel will be
required.
Headquarters
Regional
Travel
.5
61 173
-------
WORK ELEMENT 8c - PREPARE AND DISTRIBUTE PROGRAM NEWSLETTERS
METHOD:
A quarterly newsletter will be prepared (using information gathered
from Work Elements 8a and 8b) and issued to all NURP participants to
keep them informed on the status of the Prototype Projects. If any
innovative approaches are taken or any breakthroughs are made,
special bulletins will be issued to all participants.
PRODUCTS:
A quarterly newsletter and bulletins on latest developments.
SCHEDULE:
The first newsletter will be distributed shortly after the first
quarterly reports are reviewed (approximately November 1978). News-
letters will continue until the last quarterly reports are reviewed
in September 1981.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
This Work Element will require approximately 30 person-days effort
by Headquarters (it is anticipated that this work can be accom-
plished by one person in the Communications Section). No travel
is involved.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .1 0
Regional 0 0
62
174
-------
WORK ELEMENT 8d - PROVIDE INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE FUNCTION
METHOD:
Participating agencies will be encouraged to submit questions
related to their Prototype Projects or the state-of-the-art of
urban runoff to the NURP. Files will be kept on projects nation-
wide as well as any new developments within the program. Infor-
mation will be transferred through training sessions, workshops,
seminars, conferences, professional journals, etc.
PRODUCTS:
Timely information in response to requests.
SCHEDULE;
This Work Element will be initiated in August 1978 and continue
throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
NURP personnel will require an estimated 50 person-^ays effort
to answer questions (or research answers), set up worktops, etc.
Some travel will be required.
p-Yr Travel
Headquarters -3 $200
Regional 2. -
.3 $200
63
ITS
-------
WORK ELEMENT 8e - MAINTAIN PROTOTYPE PROJECT STATUS FILE
METHOD:
Information gained from Work Elements 8a, 8b, and 8c will be
filed in an orderly system, with separate files for each Proto-
type Project. These files will be kept current, so the status of
each project can be determined at any time.
PRODUCT:
An easily accessible filing system to be used to determine the
status of each Prototype Project.
SCHEDULE:
The file will be established in August 1978 and updated throughout
the project.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
The filing of projects will be an ongoing process, requiring only
the effort to place notes and reports in the proper file.
?-Yr Travel
Headquarters .1 0
Regional 0 0
.1 0
64 Ilk
-------
WORK ELEMENT 8f - ESTABLISH PROGRAM STEERING COMMITTEE: CHAIR MEETINGS
METHOD:
A steering committee will be established, composed of members from
EPA Headquarters, Regions, the Off ice-of Research and Development,
and statewide, areawide, and local WQM agencies. It will be chaired
by Headquarters for the purpose of providing guidance and direction
to the program.
PRODUCTS:
None.
SCHEDULE;
The committee will be formed in September 1978 and will be main-
tained throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Required time may vary depending on the needs. It is estimated that
a maximum of 15 person-days will be required for Headquarters or
Regional personnel.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .05 $3,000
Regional .05 $1,000
.10 $4,000
65
177
-------
WORK ELEMENT 8g - PROVIDE PROGRAM POLICY AND GUIDANCE
METHOD:
Other Branches within the Water Planning Division will provide
guidance on financial, institutional and legal issues to avoid
duplication of research.
PRODUCTS:
Program policy and guidance (especially guidance on financial
alternatives for implementation).
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in August 1"978 and will con-
tinue throughout the program.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
An estimated 100 person-days effort will be required f or NURP per-
sonnel to relay questions and obtain answers.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .4 0
Regional 0 0
.4 0
-------
WORK ELEMENT 9a - ANALYZE THE INFORMATION DEVELOPED IN PRECEDING TASKS TO
IDENTIFY AND ASSESS MAJOR TRENDS AND CAUSE AND EFFECT
RELATIONSHIPS
METHOD:
This Work Element is necessary to gain an accurate perspective of
the degree to which urban runoff is a problem of national impor-
tance. The analysis will require a thorough examination of infor-
mation obtained in previous tasks to determine the need for policy
changes or reconsideration. Major trends and cause and effect
relationships will be identified using data gathered in Prototype
Projects.
PRODUCT:
An analysis on which to base conclusions about the national im-
portance of urban runoff.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated November 1978 and completed
in late 1982.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Considerable time will be needed by the program manager and the
consultant team to thoroughly examine any information gathered
from the projects to perform a proper analysis.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters i-°
0 0
Regional ,
1.0
67
179
-------
WORK ELEMENT 9b - ANALYZE AVAILABLE INFORMATION TO DETERMINE ITS
RELATIONSHIP TO POLICY ISSUES (INCLUDING LEGAL,
INSTITUTIONAL, AND FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS)
METHOD:
Policy issues must be considered if control alternatives are to
be required because such issues have legal, institutional, and
financial implications. The analysis of both established and po-
tential new policies should be coordinated with the governments
that will issue them (i.e., regions, State and local agencies).
PRODUCT:
An information base by which a relationship between policies needed
to be implemented and possibility of implementation can be deter-
mined .
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will begin in January 1981 and will continue
until the relationships between available information and policy
issues have been determined (approximately in January 1982).
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Considerable time will be needed by both Headquarters and the con-
sultant team to gather information on existing public policy in
local areas.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters .5 0
Regional .3 0
68
180
-------
WORK ELEMENT 9c - ASSESS THE PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY OF EFFECTIVE CONTROL
MEASURES
METHOD:
To determine the practical applicability of effective control meas-
ures, costs and the effectiveness of various candidate control meas-
ures will be assessed. Monetary, social, and environmental costs
will be examined.The effectiveness of measures will be determined
by .how well they practically reduce impacts on water quality.
PRODUCTS:
Cost-effectiveness curves for candidate control measures.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in September 1981 and will con-
tinue until any valid conclusions are drawn to be included in the
final report.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Considerable time will be needed to determine costs and benefits.
Analysis will be done by the program manager and the consultant team.
Headquarters
Regional
Travel
69
181
-------
WORK ELEMENT 9d - ASSESS PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR IMPLEMENTING URBAN RUNOFF
CONTROLS
METHOD; Information from ongoing public participation efforts
associated with this prototype project will be assessed
by staff members of the Water Planning Division from
reports prepared by Regional public involvement staff.
Methods of obtaining the information will include: con-
sultation with the public, at meetings, written corres-
pondence, phone communication, etc. Public perspective
and potential support for controlling urban runoff is
what needs to be understood.
PRODUCT; The development of management practices for controlling
urban runoff that will reflect the values of the affected
affected public and have its support.
SCHEDULE; This work element will be initiated November 1978 and
contine through the end of the program. This is a
continuation of work element 7e.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Most of the manpower will be on reviewing what comes from
the work element 7e effort. 20 person-days will be
needed.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters: .1 0
Regions: 0 0
0 0
-------
WORK ELEMENT lOa - REVIEW QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL 208 REPORTS
METHOD:
Submitted Prototype Project reports (quarterly and annually), will
be re-reviewed from a nationwide perspective. Information gained
frota this review includes cause and effect data and control effec-
tiveness and costs. This element is essential to the organization
and completion of the remaining Work Elements.
PRODUCT:
A general knowledge of the information contained in the summary
reports.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in October 1979. The actual
review will continue through December 1981, but the reports will
be used as references until the final report is written.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Time will be needed by both the program manager and the consultant
team in addition to the time covered in element 7a.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters 1-°
Regional 2. —
1.0 0
70 183
-------
WORK ELEMENT lOb - SUMMARIZE CAUSE AND EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS, RESOURCE
NEEDS, AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROL ALTERNATIVES
METHOD:
At the end of each year, summary reports will be written using in-
formation gathered from Work Element lOa. These reports will con-
tain information on resources and money involved, information on
cause-and-effect relationships, and estimates of control effective-
ness and costs. These annual reports will be used in assessing the
overall NURP accomplishments.
PRODUCTS:
Annual NURP summary reports,
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in October 1979 and will con-
tinue until September 1981, when the final annual reports will be
reviewed.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
The major part of the time required for this Work Element is covered
in Element 8a. However, Work Element 8a's purpose is to monitor the
projects, whereas this element focuses on summarizing the reports
submitted. Therefore, additional time is allotted to summarize any
information that was not obtained in Work Element 8a.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters 2.0 0
Regional 0 0
2.0 0
71
184
-------
WORK ELEMENT lOc - SUMMARIZE INSTITUTIONAL, LEGAL, AND FINANCIAL ASPECTS
METHOD:
Summary reports will be prepared using applicable information
gained in Work Element 9b and any new information found in the
progress reports. These summaries will contain all institutional,
legal, and financial aspects of the Prototype Projects, to be used
in assessing the probability of selected controls being implemen-
ted.
PRODUCTS:
Annual NURP summary reports.
SCHEDULE:
This element will be initiated in October 1979 and will continue
until September 1981, when the final annual reports are being re-
viewed.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
In addition to time required in Work Element 9b, time must be al-
located to summarize any areas not covered in that element. This
time will be required of both the program manager and the consul-
tant team.
p-Yr Travel
Headquarters -5
Regional __
.5
72 185
-------
WORK ELEMENT lOd - DOCUMENT URBAN RUNOFF PROBLEMS, EFFECTIVENESS OF
CONTROLS, AND COST OF IMPLEMENTATION
METHOD:
This element is essentially a summary of what the Prototype Proj-
ects have accomplished nationwide. Using information in this Work
Element, a nationwide control program can be developed. Documenting
the problems will include their geographical location and their
severity. Control effectiveness and costs will be determined by
analyzing cost-benefit figures in addition to all institutional,
legal and financial aspects involved.
PRODUCT:
Nationwide summary report to be used in developing the nationwide
urban runoff control program.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated after Work Elements lOb and
lOc are completed (possibly concurrently) and will be completed by
December 1981.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
The element will be accomplished by the program manager and the
consultant team.
Travel
Headquarters 1.5 0
Regional 0 0
1.5 0
73
186
-------
WORK ELEMENT lOe - SYNTHESIZE A NATIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF CONTROL PROGRAM
METHOD:
Based on information obtained and lessons learned from the NURP,
a nationwide urban runoff control program will be synthesized. This
program will be developed using data from Work Element lOd, taking
into account transferability of data and any aspects not considered
in the previous Work Elements. The nationwide program will include
problems to be solved and costs associated with solutions.
PRODUCT:
A Nationwide Urban Runoff Control Program.
SCHEDULE:
This Work Element will be initiated in December 1981 and completed
in December 1982.
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS:
Time will be required of the program manager and the consultant team.
P-Yr Travel
Headquarters «70
Regional 2. —
.70 0
74
187
-------
FY 79 WORK PROGRAM
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SECTION
December 4, 1978
138
-------
WORK ELEMENT lOf - PREPARE REPORT TO CONGRESS
METHOD:
The final report Co Congress will be a summary of the whole program:
its objectives, how it accomplished its objectives, data gathered,
documentation of problems, effectiveness of controls, cost of im-
plementation, and a recommended nationwide urban runoff control
program.
PRODUCT:
Report to Congress.
SCHEDULE:
Information gathering for this report will begin in August 1979.
Report writing will be initiated in early December 1982, to be fin-
ished in mid-1983.
RESOUR.CE REQUIREMENTS:
In addition to the time required to organize all the information
in the previous elements of this task, additional time must be al-
located to do the actual writing of the report. This element will
be accomplished by the program manager and the consultant team.
Travel
Headquarters • /3 0
Regional u
75
Iffi
-------
OPERATIONS BRANCH
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SECTION
FY 1980 Work Plan
Introduction
In FY 1980, the Public Involvement Section will continue to expand its
emphasis on communicating more effectively with those who affect and ere
affected by the policies and priorities of the WQM program. The Section's
objective is to educate and inform national and State decision-makers, interest
groups, Regional Offices, State and areawide WQM agencies and WPD staff on the
program's objectives, policies, priorities, status, and accomplishments.
The Section will also continue its emphasis on the integration of public
participation concepts and requirements into the overall management and policy
framework at both Headqurters and Regional levels. Part of this process will
be the transfer of funding support responsibility to Regional Offices.
Recognizing the amount of work these objectives entail, and the limited
staff resources available, the Section will use an increased level of contractor
and consultant support in FY 80. The bulk of section staff time will be
devoted to communications.
Our communications strategy is heavily oriented to the preparation of a
variety of written materials, although existing AV materials will be marketed
to some extent. Although general mailings and specialized written materials
will be used .for much of our communications, work with OMB, the Congress, and
key State officials will be much more heavily oriented to personal contact and
keyed to oversight, authorization, and budget schedules.
The Section will be using some new approaches and expanding on previous
ones to reach more people, more frequently, with information targeted to their
interests and needs. This includes a Congressional member file, and identifying,
soliciting, and clerical processing of a significant number of additions to
our mailing list, coded to their interests; improving our existing printed
materials (Bulletin, KDS), and using new materials such as prototype status
reports, WQM accomplishments, work plans information, and editorials and press
releases.
Our public participation strategy is oriented to Headquarters and Regional
staff training, and monitoring and evaluation of Regional management. Our
training activities will be conducted largely by ongoing contracts, although
we will provide in-house training to Headquarters staff. Our monitoring of
Regional public involvement management will involve principally oversight and
evaluation of the use of State and Regional financial assistance provided in
FY 79 and 80.
Communication with, and involvement of, the many publics who impact — and
are impacted by -- WQM is not solely the responsibility of the Section. Coopera-
tion, involvement and support from other WPD and Regional staff is also
190
-------
the workplan. The production of the WQM Bulletin is a good example.
OBJECTIVE I -- Assure effective communication of WQM program objectives
policies, status and accomplishments: f
A. to national decision-makers including OMB, the Congress, and State
and EPA management
B. to State, business and industry, public and environmental interest
groups
C. to Regional offices, and State and areawide WQM agency staff
D. within the Water Planning Division, including staff development
A. Communications with Congress. OMB, States, and EPA Managers
APPROACH: The Section's objective is to help WPD management build on the
successes of the past year in communicating with Congress, GAO, OMB, State
officials and EPA management. The Section will build greater capability for
doing this in several ways. New consulting contracts will strengthen the
public speaking and executive briefing skills required for all in the Division
to do a better job in these areas. A new Congressional district file will
allow management to track what WQM is doing in the districts of key members,
as well as the concerns expressed by those members. Data gathering capability
to support such communication will be extended by new Section activity on Work
Plan Summaries (Management Information System) and quarterly prototype project
reports.
While the emphasis of the Division's approach is direct,, face-to-face
contact with National and State decision-makers, the Section helps organize
the information that goes into such communications. The Section's editorial
skills and resources are available to help prepare speeches, talking points,
briefing papers, fact sheets, and full-scale reports (e.g., Oversight Testimony)
Personal contacts and specific information materials will be keyed to
schedules for budget reauthorization/authorization, appropriations, annual
oversight, ZBB, grant awards, etc.
Work Tasks
o Maintain continuous face-to-face contact with staff on Hill/OMB, tied to
authorization/appropriation cycles, and with key State officials.
o Establish and maintain an activities file for key congressional members
which includes issues raised about WQM, positions taken, accomplishments
achieved, etc.
191
-------
o Report on a quarterly basis status of prototype projects, and accomplish-
ments identified by PEB.
o Write, edit, design and print 4 issues of the WQM Bulletin
o Develop and update a quarterly fact sheet on the WQM program and priorities.
o Establish and maintain work plan portion of WPD management information
system, summarizing, cross-referencing, etc.
o Update annually, WQM Directory, a listing of all WQM planning agencies;
grant awards, addresses, maps; Regional, State and local contacts; plan
completion dates and priority problems.
o Develop revised/targeted mailing list based on response to WPD Bulletin
request, meetings, with technical program personnel and management direc-
tives. Manage GSA Denver contract for updating and receiving mailing
lists.
o Respond to general information requests from Congressmen.
I. B. Communications with State, Business/Industry, and Public Interest
Groups
APPROACH: The goal of the Part 25 regulations is to encourage
two-way dialogue between government planners and the publics who are
affected by their actions. The Division's most important decisions
are those that affect the program nationally, and therefore the
involvement of nationally represented interest groups is an essential
first step in the dialogue. At this level, our strategy will mainly
involve speeches, briefings, press releases and editorials, personal
contacts, and limited grant activities.
Beyond that, however, further outreach is needed if the dialogue
is to continue and succeed. The ultimate implementers of WQM plans
and programs are State and local decisionmakers and citizens. It is
important that the Section increase efforts to educate these groups
about the WQM program, build support for the program among them,
respond to their needs, and provide assistance. We need to build
support among the members of these groups to implement State and
local WQM programs and to transfer prototype technology and other
WQM accomplishments.
Our approach to this task will be to rely heavily on written communications
delivered by direct mail. The approach includes both national grants for
communications (NACo, ICMA) and increased inhouse efforts on the Bulletin and
mailing list. The primary groups targetted are:
State Interest Organizations—such as ASIWPCA, NCSL, NGA, ICWP, etc.
Local Interest Organizations—such as NACD, NARC, NACo, ICMA, NIC, etc.
Nonpoint Source Business/Industry Groups—the many organizations repre-
sent uig~~alF:ft:uTr^ mining, groundwater, and
other industries that can help control nonpoint source pollution.
192
-------
Civic and Environmental Organizations—the many such qrouos (e u **,
Walton League, League of Women Voters, etc.) who have traditional y'worked in
support of Clean Water Act goals. y woncea in
Engineering -and Professional Organizations—such as WPCF AWWA
NWWA, APA ASCE.^etc.,professionally, these groups dominate the institutions
responsible for implementing WQM programs. m-uuiuns
'VJork Tasks
o Prepare speeches/agendas/talking points and briefings -for major meeti
and targeted groups in FY 80. *•.•
o Manage National grants to NCSL, NACo, NARG, ICMA including review of
materials and information transfer. Review and award -funds to national
grantees for FY 80 allotment.
o Prepare as appropriate press releases and editorials for major national
journals on WQM and priority programs.
o Track pertinent meetings of National organizations and identify to manage-
ment for possible participation.
o Write, edit, design and print 4 issues of the WQM Bulletin.
o Report on a quarterly basis status of prototype projects and accomplishments
identified by PEB.
o Maintain liaison with external program advisory group, assuring their
early involvement and feedback with respect to national policy
formulation.
o. Develop and update a quarterly fact sheet on the WQM program and priorities.
o Develop -revised/targeted mailing list based on response to WPD Bulletin
request, meetings with technical program personnel and management directives.
Manage GSA Denver contract for updating and receiving mailing lists.
o Exhibit WQM material (WPCF Booth) at WPCF Conference and National Meeting.
o Update semi-annually WQM Bibliography, an.annotated listing of all material
on WQM and related areas - incorporate Data Clearinghouse, a short
abstract listing of 208 agency reports by category.
o Update annually WQM Directory, a listing of all WQM planning agencies,
grant awarH addresses; maps; Regial, State and local contacts; plan
completion dates and priority problems.
o Respond to general information requests.
193
-------
C. Communications with Regions and State/Areawlde WQK Agencies
Because State, areawide, and analogous local agencies are the direct,
line-level program managers for many aspects of WQM, full, clear, and timely
communication between them and EPA's central administration is essential.
Both WPD (headquarters) and the Regional Offices must help make this commu-
nications process effective. Role ambiguities complicate the process. These
audiences are both internal and external, partners and subordinates. WPD's
goal is to increase the State role in program management; yet WPD also needs
to communicate national policies, priorities, and ground rules.
While the Regional Offices are EPA's primary interface with State and
areawide agencies, the section will augment the Regional effort with wider
direct mailing of the Bulletin, the Key Developments Summary, and other appro-
priate documents.
Regions also operate public information programs which can help explain
the WQM program to appropriate regional and local publics. They publish news-
letters, distribute publications, and translate EPA news for local media. One
FY 80 Section objective is to develop closer working relations with the Public
and Intergovernmental Affairs officers in each Region, and to identify new
opportunities for cooperative communications projects. The section will seek
to place articles in Regional newsletters; improve Regional distribution of
WQM publications and audio visuals; and coordinate with them in advance on
press releases.
The section will seek to enhance WPD/Regional communications further by
mailing appropriate major WQM documents (including an extended KDS) to all
Regional Office and State and areawide WQM agency staff involved in the program.
The section will also play a support role in the Work Plan Summary portion of
the developing WQM Management Information System. A portion of the Barry
Lawson Inc. contract will help extend basic concepts and skills of Regional
program staff in public information. The PM/INFO/TECH system will continue as
revised.
In the past year, WPD has established a firm and clear direction for the
WQM program. The Public Involvement Section can help stimulate and strengthen
the continuing dialogue required for accomplishment of the program's goals.
Work Tasks
o Procure facilities and equipment; invite attendees; arrange reservations;
develop and print agendas; and perform other managerial and logistical
functions including contractor oversight for April National Conference.
o Mail as necessary INFO/PM/TECH's information documents, etc. to Regions,
States and areawides.
o Coordinate the distribution of information materials/press releases with
regional OPA's and RICA's.
194
-------
o Expand content and distribution of Key Developments Summary- States and
areawides to be included; PM's, iNFO's, and TECH's to Krtrarted.
o Develop revised/targeted mailing list based on response to WPD Bulletin
request meetings with technical program personnel and management directives.
Manage GSA Denver contract for updating.and receiving mailing lists.
o Write, edit, design and print 4 issues of the WQH Bulletin
o Develop and update a quarterly fact sheet on the WQM program and priorities.
o Report on a quarterly basis status of prototype projects, and accomplish-
ments identified by FEB.
o Establish and maintain work plan portion of WPD management information
system, summarizing, cross-referencing, etc.
o Coordinate supply of publications with North Carolina warehouse. Distribute
to WPD staff and Regions monthly inventory.
o Coordinate numbering and distribution of PM/INFO/TECH's and prepare and
distribute quarterly report.
o Distribute semi-annually WPD Internal Directory.
o Update semi-annually WQM Bibliography, an annotated listing of all material
on WQM and related areas — incorporate Data Clearinghouse, a short
abstract listing of 208 agency reports by category.
o Update annually WQM directory, a listing of all WQM planning agencies;
grant awards, addresses; maps; Regional, State and local contacts; plan
completion dates and priority problems.
D. WPD Internal Communications
The ultimate responsibility for better WPD internal communications lies
with each individual on the staff in his or her working relations with the
others. Internal communications is no less a priority for the Public Involvement
Section than it is for the Division generally.
The Section supports internal communications through several activities:
an internal directory, an internal calendar, and other outputs, such as the
PM/TECH/INFO system, which serve broader communications functions within the
program.
Work Tasks
o Solicit proposals, negotiate, award and manage contacts for the following
areas:
Strategy Assistance
WPD Management Training
Public Speaking
Executive Briefings
Writing/Editorial
195
-------
o Develop and provide appropriate public participation policy and training
to technical .staff of WPD.
o Establish and maintain work plan portion of WPD management information
system, summarizing, cross-referencing, etc.
o Coordinate numbering and distribution of PM/INFO/TECH's to be abstracted.
o Prepare and distribute WPD monthly calendar.
o Coordinate supply of publications with North Carolina warehouse. Distribute
to WPD staff and Regions monthly inventory.
o Distribute semi-annually WPD Internal Directory
o Write, edit, design and print 4 issues of the WQM Bulletin.
o Develop and update a quarterly bact sheet on the WQM program and priorities.
x
o Update annually WQM Directory, a listing of all WQM planning agencies;
grant awards; addresses; maps; Regional, State and local contacts; plan
completion dates and priority problems.
o Review/comment/edit, on an as-developed basis, WPD inforamtion pamphlets,
brochures, strategy and guidance documents.
OBJECTIVE II -- Promote effective public involvement in WQM nationally.
APPROACH: Since 1976, the Public Involvement Section has been laying the
groundwork for effective public participation to occur in State and local WQM
decision-making. This has been accomplished through the development of WQM
public participation policy and guidance; OWWM public participation regulations;
training of Regional Office staff in public participation skills; and through
significant funding support of public interest groups, regional activities and
Statewide coalition grants. The national policy, Regional strategies, training
programs, funding transfers, and national and State grants have been directed
to the development of a Regional management capability and to supporting local
public education/involvement for public participation in WQM.
In FY 80, the Regions will take a more direct managerial and financial
responsibility for integrating public participation in their programs. The
Public Involvement Section will assist the Regions by supplying additional
training in public participation concepts, skills, and evaluation. Also, the
Public Involvement Section will continue to review Regional public participation
work programs, oversee ongoing Regional public participation grantee progress,
and provide limited funding assistance for approved Regional public participation
activities. Though no major new public participation grants are expected,
grant activities, geared toward State coalitions and WQM advisory groups, will
continue throughout the fiscal year.
196
-------
In Headquarters, the Public Involvement Section will provide appropriate
policy direction and training to technical staff and will ensure that public
participation is adequately provided for in the prototype projects.
Work Tasks
o Develop and provide appropriate public participation policy and training
assistance to technical staff of WPD
o Review prototype work plans and status reports to assure public participa-
tion is being adequately provided for.
o Review regional work programs and assist Regions with selection, funding
and evaluative efforts. Approve and allocate funds to Regions for public
participation activities.
o Serve as project officer and provide overall management for CKT Associates'
course on public participation evaluation and Barry Lawson Associates'
course on public participation concepts and skills including: reviewing
and commenting on training materials produced, coordinating other OWWM
comments, and ensuring Regional office participation.
o Manage the cooperative agreement with Penn State University providing
advisory groups training on prioity issues in 201 and 208 including
review of training materials, selection of instructors, and coordination
of Regional and citizen advisors.
o Coordinate public participation activities with OA/OWWM/OWPS.
o Monitor and track grass-roots grants to assure progress and outputs occur
according to their workplans.
o Communication and coordination with national public interest groups
including dissemination of policy for comments.
o Manage national grant to NWF, including review of materials and information
transfer. Review and award funds to national grantees for FY 80 allotment.
197
-------
OPERATIONS BRANCH
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SECTION
FY1979 WORK'PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
With the exception of ongoing minimum staff commitment to grants allocation
and tracking, 205(g) coordination, and participation in the WQM Needs
Assessment, the Section will devote essentially all of its resources to
management, technical assistance, and coordination of the Financial
Management Assistance Project (FMAP). With improved staffing in FY 1980,
the Section will exert both a more active management and assistance role
with the FMAP team contractors and with the Regions than in FY 1979.
In January 1979, the Section began a fundamental shift in emphasis from
its historical responsibility for grants administration policy and coordi-
nation, tracking, and analysis. Initiation of the FMAP moved the Section
and the Division into a more active and substantive national role in
assuring that:
• WQM plans incorporate the financial analysis essential for
plan implementation
• costs and benefits of all treatment alternatives are fully
evaluated, and
• Regional Office, State, and areawide agency staffs receive
training jn the fiscal and management areas.
The first ten projects selected as prototypes address financing issues
and the development of analytical tool's and techniques related largely
to facility planning. This planning includes water quality standards
and AWT, waste load allocations, sewer avoidance, and point/nonpoint
source trade-offs; on-site alternatives and management; and surface water
management programs. FMAP Team's technical assistance role in these
local projects, will be completed by June 1980. FMAP's initial output
will be the development of a number of useful analytical tools and
techniques for planners and decision-makers, as well as case study
documentation of issues'and results and technology transfer principally
to Regional Office staffs. The information will be transferred both
informally and formally through a number of special technical assistance
efforts, including direct WPD information programs, publications, con-
ferences, Regional programs, and public interest group assistance.
In addition, coordination will be established with the Office of Water
Program Operations (OWPO) so that facility planning policy and other
information can incorporate the results and lessons learned from this
project.'
The Section and the FMAP team have begun to identify the projects and
approaches to be used for FY 1980 activities, which will continue on
through FY 1981. As with the 208 program overall, the FMAP projects
will be oriented entirely to financial planning and fiscal issues related
to implementation of nonpoint source control programs. Although the scope
of FMAP for FY 1980 is not yet fully defined, we anticipate a high level
of technical assistance to be made available at the Regional and local
21
198
-------
level. This will be in the form of "technology transfer" of the initial
work related to on-site systems and surface water management. An
addition will be new financial tool development oriented to other Reqion-
specific nonpoint source problem areas, such as implementation of ag? °
cultural runoff control programs in Region VII. We also anticipate
efforts, especially in Region V, with respect to financing programs for
h=PP °f self-sustaining Continuing planning. In any case, we want to
have an FMAP technical assistance project in each Region. Other related
efforts underway already include guidance to Regions, States, and areawide
agencies on the essential components of a financial work plan. There
will also be assistance to Regional Offices in the form of Regional
staff training and model FY 1980 work plan development, which will be
provided by the Section and FMAP team personnel. Although the final
FY 1980 agreement with contractors on the FMAP team is not anticipated
before June, we expect to be able to begin providing assistance to the
selected FY 1980 project agencies as early as March. This will assure
project continuity as well as an effective response to Regional needs in
these areas.
Because our primary focus and objective is development of Regional
financial management and technical assistance capability, the Section
and the FMAP team will work more closely with Regional project officers
and other staff, ensuring especially intensive involvement by project
officers in FMAP prototypes. The Section will also work more closely
with other Headquarters program offices, including the Office of Water
Program Operations, and the Office of Research and Development in develop-
ment and implementation of a comprehensive on-site systems management
strategy and in essential technology transfer system development overall.
Communication and liaison with public interest groups will be expanded
through the Financial Management Advisory Committee. Work will be con-
tinuing with NACO, the Urban Land Institute, National Association of
Home Builders, ASIWPCA and others, to develop information transfer
agreements and to build support for plan implementation objectives
overall.
We are managing FMAP as very much a cooperative effort between the Section
staff and the FMAP team consortium. In that light, the work tasks
described later reflect that sharing of responsibility ^.f^^J^
is noted in terms of the relative proportion of resf°^lb^yJ°Lf com|>
lishment between the contractors and the Section. While most °f J*«
technical assistance provided at the project location is the responsibility
of the contractors, the Section staff will participate actively also.
The Section staff will have more significant responsibility for Regional,
interest group, and EPA coordination and oversight.
22
199
-------
• collection of 205(g) financial information and analysis
of its impact on Section 106 resource distribution patterns,
• assistance in the analysis of the pros and cons of alterna-
tive methods and patterns of 106 and 208 funding,
0 participation in the development of grants administration
and audit procedures compatible with and responsive to the
needs of State/EPA Agreements and the proposed Integrated
Environmental Assistance Act, and
• participation in the WQM Needs Assessment.
The FMS will assist the Director and Branches in 1) identifying and
justifying the need for grant/program resources; 2) developing and
applying procedures to most effectively allocate resources among Regions,
State and areawide agencies; 3) monitoring, analysis and reporting
the status of grant awards and grants and Division expenditure data;
4) promoting effective financial management of resources by all WQM
grantees; and 5) providing essential management information services
to support the national and Regional program managers.
23
200
-------
OBJECTIVE 1
Implement an effective technical assistance and training program for
Regional, State and local agency planners and decision-makers concerning
financial planning and techniques to promote implementation of cost-effec-
tive WQM programs.
SUB-OBJECTIVE A/PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT
These work tasks, are focused on supervision of the FMAP team necessary to
effectively carry out the program and the indiviudal projects Also
included are various work tasks related to the selection of projects for
FY 1980 and on-site treatment system strategies.
_ . Responsibility
Tasks Sharing
Carry out the administration of the program and the
selected -projects.
• Prepare the working papers and regular reports neces-
sary to document progress and indicate direction.
• Prepare a brief paper summarizing the conclusions
and outputs of the selected FY 1979 projects, and
establishing a base point for the selected FY 1980
projects.
• Provide program management and coordination, includ-
ing:
-- monitoring of the timely and satisfactory comple-
tion of the FY 1979 work agreements for the over-
all program and the individual projects;
— developing the overall program scope of work and
budget for FY 1980;
— negotiating the individual project work agree-
ments for FY 1980;
-- providing the overall technical management and
coordination of field work;
— maintaining continuous liaison and assuring
crossflow of technical information among the
project team members and EPA;
- making necessary technical presentations on FMAP
to Federal, Regional Office, State and areawide
agency officials as requested;
— providing program direction as needed to meet
FMAP objectives;
24
FMAP Team FHS
60 40
201
-------
Responsibility
Work Tasks Sharing
FMAP Team FMS
-- providing overall project management and coordin-
ation necessary for administration of work agree-
ments and the publication and dissemination of
the program and project outputs;
-- arranging for the periodic meetings of the FMAP
project team with a frequency of six (6) weeks
or as needed 1) to share information, 2) to
discuss strategy, 3) to review work for quality
control and program direction.
t Develop and implement the selection process for ten (10) 25 75
FY 1980 FMAP projects.
* Assist the Regional Office and the State/areawide 50 50
agencies in the preparation of work programs for the
ten (10) FY 1980 FMAP projects.
• Identify State and areawide agencies working on 100
selected NPS problems, especially those regarding
on-site systems, sewer avoidance, surface water manage-
ment and agricultural runoff.
• Establish the working groups or committees necessary 25 75
to develop a coordinated strategy to encourage the
use of on-site systems wherever feasible. Priorities
are to:
* Assist ORD in research on, evaluation and technology
transfer of on-site treatment systems, and financing
and management alternatives;
* Assist OWPO in developing the strategies to evaluate
proposals for funding and management of on-site
systems in the wastewater systems construction
process.
25
202
-------
SUB-OBJECTIVE B/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING
This task focuses on carrying out the work agreements and providing direct
technical assistance to the Regional Offices and local agencies. This
includes both the FMAP projects and the FY80 work programs.
Responsibility
Sharing
Work Tasks FMAP Team FMS
• Continue working closely with the RO staffs to assist 50 50
in:
• the management of the selected FY79 and FY80
FMAP projects
• the development of TA and training programs for
State and areawide agencies
• Undertake TA and training efforts with RO staff on 25 75
" financial and fiscal management issues and problems
• Complete the technical and other work as specified 75 25
in the work programs for the 10 (ten) selected FY79
FMAP projects
• Undertake selected TA and training efforts with the RO, 50 50
State, and areawide .agencies using as a base, the initial
outputs of the selected FY79 FMAP projects.
• Undertake the technical and other work as specified in 75 25
the work programs for the 10 (ten) selected FY80 FMAP
projects.
• Continue to provide special project assistance to the 75 25
RO staffs regarding certain special problems relating
to fiscal planning and analysis. All work under this
task must be requested by the RO and receive technical
and budgetary approval as specified in the project
team work agreement
• Provide short term technical advice and assistance to 75 25
the RO staffs and to selected State and areawide agencies
in the development of FY80 work programs, as described
following:
• assist the RO staffs in their preliminary review of
the FY80 work program proposals prepared by the States
and areawides;
• develop and distribute to approved Fede raj, Stat e and
'
js:
tinuing planning activities;
26
203
-------
Work Tasks
Responsibility
Sharing
FMAP Team
FMS
provide TA to the RO staffs and selected State and
areawide agencies as they jointly develop the final
FY80 work plans.
use the FY80 work plans from selected agencies de-
scribed above as the priority group from which the
FY80 FMAP projects will be selected for intensive
TA work.
27
204
-------
SUB-OBJECTIVE C/COMMUNICATION AND LIAISON
These work tasks are focused on the need to keep a wide variety of agencies
and individuals up to date on FMAP and to maintain their interest in and
obtain their support to the program.
Responsibility
Sharing
"Ork Tasks FMAP Team FMS
• Prepare, publish and distribute quarterly status 25 75
reports on the FMAP program, projects, as well as
related activities, to selected officials at the
national, Regional, State and areawide levels
• Maintain technical liaison with the RO staffs re- 75 25
lated to the selected FY1979 and FY1980 FMAP pro-
jects
• Maintain overall policy and technical liaison with 25 75
the RO staff related to FMAP and other agency matters
« Maintain policy, technical, financial and management - 100
liaison with the broadest possible variety of interests
internal and external to EPA, such as:
• Office of Water Program Operations
* Office of Research and Development
* University of North Carolina (on-site assistance
program)
* Roy F. Weston Engineers (on-site systems manage-
ment)
* and many others
i Provide for overall coordination of contacts, mailings, - 100
travel, meetings, and other activities involving FMS,
FMAP team, and RO staffs.
• Maintain continuing liaison with the Financial Manage- 25 75
ment Advisory Committee and its membership including:
Water Pollution Control Federation
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies
National Association of Regional Councils
National League of Cities
Municipal Finance Officers Association
International City Management Association
American Public Works Association
National Association of Counties
National Conference of State Legislators
National Governor's Association
28
205
-------
Responsibility
Sharing
Work Tasks FMAP Team FMS
I Begin preparation for a make arrangements necessary 25 75
to present selected FMAP financial and management
outputs at a national meeting of water quality
planning agencies and interests
• Continue coordination with PEB to insure that FMAP 100
outputs are made available to and reflected in policy
and evaluation activities
29
206
-------
SUB-OBJECTIVE D/TOQL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
This task focuses on the preparation of procedures and practices which
effort. t0 UP9rade the1r W3ter qual1ty
Responsibility
Sharing
Work Tasks
FMAP Team
Begin the preparation and dissemination of the
financial and management tools which are out-
puts of the selected FY79 and FY80 FMAP pro-
jects.
• prepare an outline of tools and develop a 75
format for tools
. * identification of tools based on project 50
outputs and evaluation of their utility
and applicability
* prepare a packaging format for the dissemina- 75
tion of the selected tools
• undertake the formal and informal presentations 75
of the tools at the RO and local level to make
the technology available for local review and as
a test of selected tools utility in the field
Work to provide for the involvement of the HQ offices, 50
including WPD, RO's and the FMAC membership in the
evaluation, dissemination and testing of the selected
tools
Provide a second year grant to the National Association
of Counties to encourage the involvement of local offi-
cials in the WQM process by:
• identifying problems and technical assistance needs
of county water quality management agencies;
identifying thenature of authorities, resources, and
policies under which water quality management agen-
cies are operating-,
• providing an information exchange mechanism among
NACoR, EPA and counties;
• seeking review of Federal policies and programs;
and
providing information directly to county elected
officials on water quality managmenent
FMS
25
50
25
25
50
100
30
207
-------
Responsibility
Sharing
Work Tasks FMAP Team FMS
• Develop a multi-modal technology transfer system 25 75
to make the outputs of the selected FMAP projects
and tool development process readily available
at the Regional, State and areawi.de agency levels.
The system may include:
• Regional level workshops and training sessions
• various types of summaries, reports and other
printed materials and graphics
• use of teams of fiscal and management experts
to provide short term assistance in special
cases
• preparation of audio-visual presentations
31
?08
-------
OBJECTIVE 2
Provide effective, timely financial management support and coordination
within the Division, with other Headquarters offices, and with Regional
UT T i Cc*> •
SUB-OBJECTIVE A/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT AND COORDINATION
WorkTasks
t Gather and analyze data on Section 205(g) as needed to participate
in WQM-WPD policy development
Maintain current data on 205(g) awards including amount of
grant, time period of grant and activities funded.
* Develop analyses of 205(g) expenditure patterns.
• Participate in survey designed to establish actual use of 106
funds for Construction Grants Management.
* Coordinate with Construction Grants on policy for eligibility
under Section 205(g) (or possible amendments to regs).
• Participate in development of grants administration policies and
procedures for State/EPA Agreements and work plan guidance, including
audit and funding flexibility procedures.
* Develop grants policy to be included in work plan guidance
• Assist GAD in development of IEAA legislation and regulation
» Coordinate with OGC, GAD and FMD to provide interpretations regarding
legal and regulatory implications of changes in 106 and 208 allocations.
• Participate in development of alternative funding allocations for
section 106 grants for FY1981
• Develop alternative funding allocations incorporating various
methods including: update of current data; use of simple
population and land area formula; use of partial or wholly
needs-based distribution
a Assist Reaions in rapid resolution of financial management issues
involving aSvices of allowance, carry over funds, audit exception
resolution.
Resolve specific issues on as needed basis. If necessary,
coordinate response with FMD, GAD, OGC and Regional Offices.
• Identify financial management issues for WPD management and
write corrective policy when required
• Aid in conduct of the Needs Assessment
• Assist in final revision of Needs Assessment package
32
209
-------
* Continue liaison with 4 Regions and Construction Grants
re: actual performance of assessment
• Participate in writing of final report
Provide ADP and manual support essential to WPD and Regional Office
WQM information needs
Participate in development and implement action of a Management
Information System.
33
210
-------
SEC ,0tl: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SECTION R mQ ^ m^ ^ pa(JC J_ of _3_
OBJECTIVE 1
SUB
A P
•
•
•
•
B
*
t
•
•
•
WORK TASKS
e
ROGRAM ADMIN. & DEVELOPMENT
Admin, of Prog. & Projects
— Regular Reports
— Summary Report
-- FY80 Prog. Scope & Budget
— FY80 Work Agmt. Itegotiat.
— Project Team Meetings
FY80 Project Selection
Selected Proj. Work Programs
Ident. NPS Wk. Efforts &
Maintain Liaison
On-site Strategy Wk. Group
TECH. ASSISTANCE & TRAINING
Assistance to RO Staffs
RO Staff TA & Training
Complete FY79 Projects
Initial Assistance FY80 Pro
Begin FY80 Projects
• =. Scheduled Meetings
0 = Tentative Meetings
±= Published Report
monthly level of effort
(|i -...'.,)
YEAR 1979
oot
A
1
nov
A
dec
A
1
'
I. . ,
YCAR 1980
jan fcb roar apr
A
A
1
A
A
0
may jun
A
A
A
0
10 A 'S
jlfl ,UKJ SOp
A
A
0
A
leve! of
effort
(p-i-'i's)
-------
1 %'>illl: OPERATIONS BRANCH WORK SF.fJUt.NCE DIAGRAM AKO ^SOURCE PLAN
SEC 10!!: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SECTION FY lg80 Wp0 wo ^ pLAN pfcyc _2_. of J-
SUB
C
•
•
•
•
«
D
*
•
•
•
OBJECTIVE 1
WORK TASKS
COMMUNICATION & LIAISON
Quarterly Status Reports
Internal & External Liaison
Overall Contact & Travel Crd
Project Advisory Com. Mtgs.
Preparation National Mtgs.
TOOL DEV. & TECH. TRANSFER
Begin Tool Prep/Dissemntn.
— Outline & Format
-- Tool Ident. & Evaluation
-- Selected Tool Packaging
-- Formal & Informal Presnt.
Implement Tool Disetn. System
2nd Year NACO Grant
Multi -model Tech. Transfer
monthly 'level of effort
(p-m's)
YEAR 1979
oo t nov dec
yrjir, 1980
jan feb mar apr may jun jul am) st'P
A
0
A
0
0
A-
(level of
(•>{" fort
(P-,!'S)
-------
'"ii n. urtwiiuHi BKftm,n VORK SEQUENCE D AGRAM ANO HLiUUKCt PLAN
SECriOH: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SECTION ^ ^ ^ m ^ . pagc j__ of A_
OBJECTIVE 2
SUB
A
•
•
*
WORK TASK
FIN. MGMT. SUPPORT & COORD.
205(g) Data Gather/Analysis
— Survey Use of 106 Funds
— Coord. 205{g) Policy
w/ CG
Assist SEA Policy & Guidance
Coord. w/OGC, GAO, FMB on
106 & 208 allocations
Assist in Develop.. of Alter.
106 Alice, for FY 1981
Assist RO's in Resolution
of Financial Mgmt. Issues
Assist in Conduct of Needs
Assessment Process
Provide ADP Support and
Dev. and Imp. MIS
monthly' level of effort
(|l III'', )
YEAR 1979
oot
nov
dec
YCAR 1980
jan fob mar apr
may jun
jul dug sop
levy' of
efiurt
(li-m's)
-------
BRANCH: WORK SUJULNCt DIAGRAM ANU RESOURCE PLAN
SECTION: ' pa
-------
BRANCH:
SECTION:
WOIJK StlJULNCt DIAGRAM AND RESOURCE PLAN
patjc
of
JOB NO. AND NAME
Jsk description
• r
peech
egjon
uljet
"act S
-ace-
PROTO
(6 IP
ConAr
Manit
Edilc
Natic
Data
WQM
es/Talking Points (20)
al OPA/RICA Coordination
in (4 Issues)
iheets (Quarterly)
to-Face (Hill - OMB)
YPE Status/Accomplishments
rograms)
essional Member Files
ement Info System - Work P'
rials/Press Release/Briefin
)nal Meeting Tracking/Report
Clearinghouse & Bibliograph
3i rectory
YEAR
oqt
ns
3s
1
nov
A A
— A
;
dec
A
i
i
A
YEAR
jan feb mar apr
A A
A
-D D D D D D
'A A
—A
n a D D D a
A
A A.
t
A
D D D D D D C
|
A
A i
4
D a D a D a
A
may jun
A A
—k
3 D D D D Ll D
A A
4-
i
A
g a a a o D t
D a o a o D
A
i
A
jul aug sop
A
D a D a DO
D D D D D D D
i
A
A .A
A~
a o a a ' D D
D D D D O O (
A
A A
A
-
4
D DO D Dn
a a o.o a a
lOVr'l (
el run
(p-in'-.l
-------
BRANCH: WOKK SLljULNCL DIAGRAM AND RESOURCE 1' .AN
SECTION; ' patjc of
JOG NO. AND NAME
task description
1
Exhi
Aud'
Key
Ints
Mont
Rev-
Doc
Resf
NC/F
PM/I
tail
YEAR
o(]t nov dec
"
bit/Staff Support at Conferences
o-visual Marketing and Editii
Developments Summary
rnal Directory
hly Calendar
ew & Comment WPD Policy/Info
uments
ond to Cong., & Gen'l Info Re<
ublications Coordination
NFO/TECH Numbering & Report
ngs to Regions/States/ Areaw'
n
^
uests
ies
A A
A
• A
_ _ _ ,
O D
A A A A
A A
A
_ . — .
—
D '
A A A A
YEAR
jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sop
.
A A
A
_. .._ _ ..
A
A A A A
_ f- »
A A
A
-. _-
— _
ODD
A A AA
A A
A
— — — .
— — ._
A A A A
ilk ODD
A A
A
_ .__ .
— ™
A
A A A A
3 a D a
A A
i
A
A
.. . -..
— _ _
ODD
A A A A
A A
A
_,
— — ._
A A A A
A A
A
— —
^_ -.
A
A A A A
A A
A
—
D D '
A A A A
'1 I
A
_ — -. —
. — - — —
A A A A
IrV"! .
ei tun.
(d-mV.
A
k
-------
BRANCH: WORK SUJULHCt DIAGRAM AND (([SOURCE PLAN
SECTION: paijc of
JOB NO. AND NAME
task description
I
Assl
Pol
Revl
Sta
Rev
Man
Par
OA/
Ad
stance Training to WPD Progr<
cy Personnel Re Public Part
5W Prototype Work PI ans and
tus Reports
w Reg PP Funding & Alice of
e CKT & Lawson
cipate in Penn State
WM/DAA Liaison
c Advisor Coord
YEAR
ocjt nov dec
m ,
cipation
—
O Q 0
—
o
YEAR
jan feb mar apr
a a
-
., _-„ —
—
o a a
may jun
— - —
—
ODD
jul aug sop
ODD
level <
effort
(p-nr- '
------- |