United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Water Program Operations
(WH-547)
Washington, D.C. 20460
Construction Costs
for Municipal
Wastewater Conveyance
Systems: 1973-1977
'
£*f m*
m^-^LM&,
-------
EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Protection
Agency and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. In this report there
is no attempt by EPA to evaluate the practices and methods reported.
The three technical reports listed below were prepared in conjunc-
tion with the 1976 Update of Needs for Municipal Wastewater Treatment
Facilities, a biennial report to the U.S. Congress. This series of
reports provide construction cost relationships for wastewater treatment
plants and sewers presently under construction and also related opera-
tions and maintenance (O&M) cost relationships for existing facilities.
The data base for all three studies is representative of the ten regions.
Document Number
430/9-77-013 Construction Costs for Municipal
MCD-37 Wastewater Treatment Plants: 1973-1977
430/9-77-014 Construction Costs for Municipal
MCD-38 Wastewater Conveyance Systems: 1973-1977
430/9-77-015 Analysis of Operations & Maintenance
MCD-39 Costs For Municipal Wastewater Treatment
Systems
These reports were prepared under the direction of:
James A. Chamblee, Chief
Needs Assessment Section (WH-547)
Office of Water Program Operations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, B.C. 20460
(202) 426-4443
Copies of these reports are available from the address below.
When ordering, please include the title and MCD number.
General Services Administration (8FFS)
Centralized Mailing Lists Services
Bldg. 41, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
Cover Photo Courtesy: Metropolitan Denver Sewage Disposal District No. 1
-------
EPA 430/9-77-014 MCD-38
TECHNICAL REPORT
CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR MUNICIPAL
WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS:
1973 - 1977
BY
DAMES 8 MOORE
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ENGINEERING SERVICES
DENVER, COLORADO
MAY 1978
PREPARED FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAM OPERATIONS
WASHINGTON, D,C, 20460
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY 2-1
3.0 INTRODUCTION 3-1
3.1 BACKGROUND 3-1
3.2 STUDY OBJECTIVES 3-3
3.3 ADDITIONAL BENEFITS 3-4
3.4 FUTURE APPLICATIONS 3-5
3.5 DATA BASE UPDATES 3-6
4.0 SCOPE OF STUDY 4-1
4.1 PUBLIC LAW 92-500 FACILITIES 4-1
4.2 SAMPLE SELECTION 4-2
4.3 NON-CONSTRUCTION COST DATA 4-2
5.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 5-1
5.1 PRELIMINARY SURVEY 5-1
5*2f DATA COLLECTION WORKSHEET 5-1
5.3 THE DATA BASE 5-1
5.4 COST INDEXING 5-3
5.5 DATA ANALYSIS , 5-4
6.0 RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS 6-1
6.1 GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER 6-2
6.2 NON-PIPE AND APPURTENANCE COSTS 6-3
6.3 NON-CONSTRUCTION COSTS 6-8
6.4 FORCE MAIN COSTS 6-11
-------
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Concluded)
6.5 PUMPING STATION COSTS .................................. 6~li
6.6 MATERIAL/LABOR COSTS ................................... 6~14
6.7 TYPICAL SMALL COMMUNITY COSTS .......................... 6~17
7.0 SIMPLIFIED CONVEYANCE SYSTEM COST ESTIMATING TECHNIQUES ..... 7-1
7.1 BACKGROUND ............................................. 7-1
7.2 COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES ............................. 7~2
7.3 COST ESTIMATING EXAMPLE ................................ 7-6
APPENDIX A METHODOLOGY ........................................ A-l
A.I GENERAL ................................................ A-l
A. 2 WORKSHEET DEFINITIONS .................................. A-l
APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF DATA BASE ........................... B-l
APPENDIX C COST INDEXING ...................................... C-l
C.I REQUIREMENTS ........................................... C-l
C.2 COST INDEXING SYSTEMS INVESTIGATED ..................... C-2
C.3 ALASKA, HAWAII, GUAM, PUERTO RICO INDICES .............. C-3
C.4 USE OF THE EPA CUSS INDEX .............................. C-4
C.5 COMMON- BASE COST CONVERSIONS ........................... C-5
APPENDIX D SANITARY SEWER COST TABLES ......................... D-l
-------
Ill
LIST OF TABLES
Page
6.1 Average Total Cost Per Foot of Pipe 6-4
6.2 Average Total Cost Per Foot of Pipe by Pipe Type - By Depth. 6-5
6.3 Average Non-Pipe and Appurtenance Costs 6-7
6.4 Step I and Step II Costs 6-9
6.5 Step III Non-Construction Costs 6-10
6.6 Force Main Construction Costs 6-12
6.7 Sanitary Sewers - Material Costs 6-15
6.8 Sanitary Sewers - Labor Costs 6-16
6.9 Typical Small Community Sewer Costs 6-18
7.1 Sanitary Sewers - Total In-Place Costs - Simplified Cost
Estimating Techniques 7-10
7.2 Sanitary Sewer Sizing 7-11
7.3 Sanitary Sewer Area Multipliers 7-13
7.4 Sanitary Sewer Cultural Modifiers 7-15
A.I Sanitary Sewer Code Reference Table A-10
B.I Sampled Sanitary Sewer Facilities B-2
B.2 Data Base Description B-18
C.I Complete Urban Sewer System (CUSS) Index C-6
D.I Gravity Sanitary Sewer Costs - By Diameter and Region D-l
D.2 Gravity Sanitary Sewer Costs - By Diameter, Region and Pipe
Type D-4
D.3 Gravity Sanitary Sewer Costs - By Diameter, Region and
Depth D-20
D.4 Gravity Sanitary Sewer Costs - SMSA D-28
D.5 Gravity Sanitary Sewer Costs - Non-SMSAs D-31
D.6 Gravity Sanitary Sewer Costs - By Diameter, Region, Pipe
Type and Depth D-34
-------
IV
LIST OF FIGURES
6.1 Pumping Station Construction Costs 6-13
7.1 Pumping Station Construction Costs - Simplified Cost
Estimating Techniques • 7-12
A.I Data Collection Worksheet A-9
LIST OF MAPS
Page
7.1 Sanitary Sewer Cost Indexing - Area Multipliers 7-14
B.I Sampled Sanitary Sewer Facilities B-36
C.I Sanitary Sewer Facilities - City Multipliers C-7
-------
1.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
-------
1-1
1.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This report was prepared by Dames & Moore, Water Pollution Control
Engineering Services, Denver, Colorad®, under the direction of
Mr. James A. Chamblee of EPA Headquarters' Municipal Construction
Division.
Sincere appreciation is extended to EPA Construction Grants person-
nel in each of the ten regions. Their advice and assistance was
invaluable in accumulating the large quantity of construction bid data
contained herein.
Inquiries concerning this report should be directed to:
Mr. James A. Chamblee
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (WH-547)
401 M. Street Southwest
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 426-4443
-------
2.0 SUMMARY
-------
2-1
2.0 SUMMARY
The purposes of this study were to collect, categorize and analyze
construction bid data for wastewater conveyance systems nationwide with
the goal of providing a reference for estimating future facility costs.
To accomplish these goals, construction bid information was obtained from
the construction grant files in each of the ten EPA regional offices.
All facilities sampled are municipally owned conveyance systems funded
after passage of Public Law 92-500. The 455 construction projects
sampled included new and enlarged wastewater conveyance facilities.
Costs for both collector and interceptor projects were included along
with the costs of associated pump stations and force mains. Costs for
cast-in-place sanitary sewer pipe were not available in the projects
sampled for this study. In addition to construction costs, data on Step
I, Step II and the non-construction portion of Step III costs were
collected and analyzed.
Since, in practice, both grant eligible and ineligible portions of
sewer projects are included in EPA grant file bid tabulations, construc-
tion costs for both were gathered and analyzed with equal weight in this
study. Costs of facilities for treating collected sewage are not includ-
ed in this report. A parallel document with similar objectives for
treatment plants has been published by the Environmental Protection
Agency and is entitled "Construction Costs for Municipal Wastewater
Treatment Plants 1973-1977", (EPA 430/9-77-013, MCD-37).
-------
2-2
Construction costs in this report are presented as dollars per-foot
of sewer in-place including both materials and labor. Cost of appurten-
ances such as manholes, pipe-casing and special bedding are both included
in tables for total construction cost and analyzed separately to identify
their individual effect on costs. Similarly, costs for Step I, Step II
and Step III non-construction items are itemized separately and added
into tables for total per-foot construction cost.
All cost data used in this report, except Chapter 7.0 costs, were
updated to third quarter 1977 dollars using the EPA Complete Urban Sewer
System (CUSS) Index as published quarterly by EPA. Chapter 7.0 costs
were updated to first quarter 1978 dollars using the CUSS index.
Care should be taken by the user of cost data presented in this
report. Costs for construction of sanitary sewer facilities range
widely with variation in one or more of many parameters including labor
wage rates, depth of cut and necessity of trench shoring, bedding condi-
tions due to variation in ground water elevation, material supplies and
contractor availability. While quantification of the effect of these
variables has been attempted in this study, every effort should be made
by those interested in sewer construction costs to estimate the results
of these parameters in a specific project's bidding environment.
-------
2-3
In some cases insufficient data were available to develop cost
relationships for specific pipe diameters, appurtenances or non-construc-
tion costs. As more construction cost history becomes available, the
existing data base can be expanded and regularly updated providing a more
complete series of cost estimating relationships.
-------
3.0 INTRODUCTION
-------
3-1
3.0 INTRODUCTION
3,1 Background
The United States Environmental Protection Agency and its predeces-
sor agencies have provided financial aid to local municipalities for
wastewater treatment and collection facility construction since 1957.
In the twenty one years of these grants programs several thousand munici-
pal facilities have been constructed, enlarged, or upgraded. Under the
authority of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (Public
Law 92-500), this effort intensified as the EPA set out to achieve the
goals of that act, including:
1. "That the discharge of pollutants into the navigable water
be eliminated by 1985."
2. "That wherever attainable, an interim goal of water quality
which provides for the protection and propagation of fish,
shellfish, and wildlife and provides for recreation in and on
the water be achieved by July 1, 1983."
Under PL 92-500, collector sewers became grant eligible for the
first time and EPA grant assistance increased from 50 to 75 percent for
interceptor sewer projects. More importantly, funds allocated to water
pollution abatement increased substantially under the act as shown in the
following table:
-------
3-2
PL 92-500 OBLIGATIONS
(Federal Share)
Fiscal Year Ending Dollars Obligated
6/30/73 $ 1,591,000,000
6/30/74 1,384,000,000
6/30/75 3,616,000,000
9/30/76 4,809,000,000
9/30/77 6,669,000,000
Total to 9/30/77 $ 18,069,000,000
In total, 18 billion dollars have been obligated to date in funding
over 11,000 treatment plant and sewer facilities under PL 92-500.
Surprisingly, over 50 percent of these funds were designated for con-
struction of sewer facilities. The increase in level of effort evidenced
by this allocation is tremendous when compared to the 6.1 billion dollars
funded between 1961 and 1972 under previous programs. Recently, the 1977
amendments to the Clean Water Act authorized 4.5 billion dollars per year
in Federal funds to be appropriated for the construction of water pollu-
tion control facilities for each of the next four years. Based on the
1976 Needs Survey, approximately 35 billion dollars, or 36 percent of the
total Category I through V needs, are for eligible collector and inter-
ceptor facilities. These facts indicate that construction of wastewater
conveyance systems will continue to be an area of intense financial
concern for many years.
-------
3-3
3.2 Study Objectives
The increased intensity and volume of construction work underway
since the passage of PL 92-500 has combined with general inflationary
economic trends to cause a sharp rise in wastewater conveyance facility
construction costs. Tracking these price trends is difficult since many
factors which are difficult to predict, like material and labor cost,
affect the final cost of any facility. However, in order to control and
project expenditures, the EPA must have access to accurate cost estimat-
ing techniques and objective criteria for future allocations of pollution
control money.
This study, using data on the cost of constructing wastewater
conveyance systems in the recent past, attempts to establish an empirical
base from which future costs can be estimated. The assumption is made
that past costs can be adjusted for inflation, material and labor cost
fluctuations and various other influences to yield an estimate of what
similar facilities will cost in the future. These estimating procedures
are intended to be simple and accurate enough to be applied to EPA's
future cost estimating needs, including:
1. Step I (Facilities Planning) Cost Effective Analysis Require-
ments.
2. Step II (Plans and Specifications) Design Cost Guidelines.
3. Biennial Needs Survey Cost Estimating, as required by PL 92-500.
4. 208 Areawide Planning, Cost Effective Analysis.
-------
3-4
3.3 Additional Benefits
While EPA's cost estimating needs provide the main impetus for this
study, there are other important benefits in related fields, including
those outlined below. An attempt has been made to direct this document
to each of these audiences to the extent possible.
3.3.1 Input to CAPDET Model
Concurrent with this study, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers launched a joint effort to refine the Corps' existing CAPDET
Model (Computer Assisted Procedure for the Design and Evaluation of
Wastewater Treatment Systems). Along with estimating the cost of treat-
ment plants, CAPDET will allow estimation of construction costs for
wastewater conveyance systems. It is anticipated that the present study
will provide unit costs for sewer pipe and appurtenances as input to
TRANS, in addition to non-construction costs essential for complete
estimates.
3.3.2 State Pollution Control Construction Programs
Many states operate construction grant programs which are an inte-
gral part of the Federal program and growing just as rapidly. The
construction cost tabulations presented in this study could help person-
nel in these programs estimate future costs.
-------
3-5
3.3.3 Planning Agencies at Local and Regional Levels
At the initial stage of project planning, cost of previous construc-
tion in a usable format would provide a beneficial tool, if not the only
tool, for cost estimates by local and regional planners.
3.3.4 Citizen Participation
A section of the data presented in this study is intended to provide
interested citizens with a simple method of estimating the cost and
potential tax burden of proposed sewer systems. Section 7.0 presents
simplified cost estimating procedures with examples of their use for
those interested in general sewer system construction costs. It should
be noted that guidelines for determining eligibility for collector sewer
grant assistance are set forth under Title II of the Clean Water Act and
are clarified in subsequent program requirements memoranda. These
regulations are important in estimating potential tax burden for a
specific community. Section 6.7 presents a general analysis of selected
sewer projects including per capita costs and required sewer lengths.
3.4 Future Applications
Cost estimates based on previous construction bid data cannot, of
course, replace engineers' estimates for wastewater conveyance system
projects. However, the history of construction cost must be a major
consideration in economic planning efforts. As this data base is
developed and refined based on accumulation of cost experience, it should
become complementary to and supportive of other cost estimating
-------
3-6
techniques. Also, as a benchmarking tool it should serve to illuminate
significant disparities in cost estimates for sewer system and lead to
rationalization of these differences.
3.5 Data Base Updates
It is the EPA's intention to update cost data on a regular basis
subsequent to this initial study, thus creating a "construction cost
history" for wastewater conveyance systems. EPA funding of new municipal
projects should yield a quantity and quality of bid data sufficient for
this purpose.
-------
4.0 SCOPE OF STUDY
-------
4-1
4.0 SCOPE OF STUDY
4.1 Public Law 92-500 Facilities
This study was limited to projects either completely or partially
funded under PL 92-500. Generally, collector sewer systems are eligible
for grant assistance if they serve a community in existence on October
18, 1972 and are proven cost-effective. Interceptor sewer facilities are
eligible if determined cost-effective based on facility planning informa-
tion. In most cases bid data for grant ineligible sewer facilities
are included with the tabulation of eligible facilities in the EPA grant
files. Cost data for both eligible and ineligible facilities were
gathered and analyzed in this study.
All projects sampled in this study were bid after second quarter
1973 and as a result allow three advantages. First, recent construction
costs minimize the effects of changing construction practices and regula-
tory revisions on resultant cost relationships. Second, the accuracy of
indexing costs to a current base dollar increases with more recent data.
Third, the effect of the law itself on construction costs is effectively
discounted.
A list of facilities from which bid data was collected is presented
by region and by state in Appendix B. Map B.I depicts the location of
the sewer construction projects sampled in this study.
-------
4-2
4.2 Sample Selection
Because of the large number of grants issued under PL 92-500 and
the tremendous amount of resultant cost information, coupled with limited
EPA resources, it was not feasible to review all recently constructed
facilities nationwide.
In a parallel study analyzing costs of treatment plant construction
(MCD-37), a statistical analysis was performed to determine the size,
type and location of plants necessary for a valid sample. This analysis
was based on the Grants Information Control System (GIGS) file and
resulted in a data base of 536 treatment plants. For the purposes of
this study, it was assumed that a valid sample of conveyance system costs
would result by gathering data for sewer facilities constructed in
conjunction with treatment plants. There were 285 sewer systems sampled
in this category. In addition, 170 sampled sewer facilities were
constructed independent of treatment plant projects. Emphasis was placed
on obtaining a representative sampling from each EPA region and state
with projects from both Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSA)
and non-SMSA's covering a wide range of pipe sizes and construction
conditions.
4.3 Non-Construction Cost Data
The normal procedure for allotment of water pollution control funds
under PL 92-500 to eligible communities encompasses three "steps." The
-------
4-3
Step I phase includes facility planning, general cost-effective analysis
and preliminary sewer design. Step II funds provide for preparation of
detailed plans and specifications for the chosen alternative, while Step
III monies are allotted for actual construction.
This study provided for the collection of non-construction cost data
including the non-construction portion of Step III costs such as adminis-
trative, fiscal, legal, engineering and land acquisition. Step I and
Step II grant costs and other significant items were also accumulated.
Non-construction costs are presented in this report separately and as
part of total per foot costs for in-place sewerage facilities.
-------
5.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
-------
5-1
5.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
5.1 Preliminary Survey
Prior to extensive collection of facility cost information, a
preliminary survey of available construction bid data was performed.
This survey investigated municipal and state construction files as well
as those in EPA regional offices. It was found that EPA grant files
provided the most consistent and detailed cost information and, there-
fore, were the exclusive source of construction bid information for this
study.
5.2 Data Collection Worksheet
After reviewing the preliminary survey, data collection worksheets
were developed and collection efforts begun in each of the ten EPA
regional offices. Data collection worksheets were designed to facilitate
keypunching and recall of cost information for computer analysis. They
also provided for collecting itemized costs for non-construction items
such as legal fees, administrative expense, project inspection, Step I,
and Step II costs. In addition, physical parameters such as land use,
soil conditions and topography were coded. Appendix A provides a
detailed description of the data forms with definitions of the coded
items.
5.3 The Data Base
Construction cost data were taken from winning contractor bid
tabulations only. Consideration was given to gathering and averaging bid
-------
5-2
costs from the two or three low bidders. While this method may have
dampened the effect of certain bid irregularities, available time and
manpower resources precluded the use of this approach.
The data base for the cost tables and relationships developed in
this study is comprised of over 13,000 bid items for both construction
and non-construction costs. Construction costs include unit costs for
gravity sewers and force mains, broken down into labor and material
components when available. Information for sewer pipe is classified by
diameter, pipe type and depth; lengths, unit costs and total costs are
included for each bid item. Data for pumping stations, both package and
custom built, were collected, including pumping capacity and total
dynamic head. Costs for appurtenances and other non-pipe costs associ-
ated with gravity and pressure sewers were coded and analyzed in Section
6.0 of this report. These appurtenances and non-pipe costs include:
- Manholes - Standard and Drop
Thoroughfare crossings
- Pavement Removal and Replacement
Utility Removal and Reconnections
Rock Excavation
Special Pipe Bedding
- Miscellaneous Appurtenances
Non-construction costs collected and analyzed included:
- Administrative/Legal
Preliminary
-------
5-3
- Land, Structures, Right-of-Way
- Architect/Engineer Basic Fees
- Other Architect/Engineer Fees
- Project Inspection
Land Development
- Relocation Expense
Relocation Payments to Individuals and Businesses
Demolition and Removal
- Bond Interest
Contingency
- Indirect Costs
- Miscellaneous
Equipment
- Other Eligible Costs
Mobilization costs were often bid separately and thus were itemized
as separate appurtenance costs, while dewatering, trench shoring and
normal pipe bedding were included in the cost for in-place sewer pipe.
Pipe jacking and casing costs were incorporated in the appurtenance
category of which they were a part such as a particular stream or thor-
oughfare crossing.
5.4 Cost Indexing
Costs were updated from their bid date to third quarter 1977 dollars
using the EPA Complete Urban Sewer System (CUSS) cost Index. Thus, all
-------
5-4
cost relationships presented in Section 6 are third quarter 1977 dollars.
Appendix C describes the procedure employed to bring all reported con-
struction costs to a common dollar base.
5.5 Data Analysis
Initial computer screening of the bid data was performed to ensure
quality of the data base. Unrealistically high or low bid prices were
eliminated in this process. An example of deleted items would be bids
such as one cent per foot of eight inch clay pipe or one cent per cubic
yard of rock excavation. Such bid peculiarities result from contractor's
surpluses of a particular item or contractor's speculation on the
anticipated quantities of specific bid items and are not representative
of realistic marketplace construction values.
Conveyance system construction costs have been developed on the
basis of dollars per foot of pipe in-place. Section 6.0 presents total
in-place construction costs by diameter, pipe type and depth. Appendix D
presents unit costs for various pipe types, depths and diameters by EPA
Region. To obtain total in-place costs, the cost of appurtenances and
non-construction items had to be allocated to individual pipe costs. The
following procedure was used to accomplish this:
1. Appurtenance costs were summed for the entire project.
-------
5-5
2. Non-construction costs including Step I, Step II and Step III
non-construction items were totalled for the project.
3. The total volume of sewer pipe was calculated using the diameter
and length of each pipe bid item.
4. For each bid item the ratio of volume for that specific item to
the total volume of the job was calculated.
5. To the unit cost for each pipe item was added the portion of
appurtenance and non-construction cost resulting from multiply-
ing (4) by (1) and (2), respectively.
The breakdown of total per-foot pipe costs into pipe cost, appurten-
ance cost and non-construction costs is shown in Section 6.0 also.
A significant percentage of the total expense of a wastewater
conveyance project results from non-construction cost items. These
non-construction costs were readily available during the course of data
collection from the EPA grant files. In addition to being included in
total pipe costs, non-construction costs have been analyzed separately.
Tables 6.4 and 6.5 summarize the average ratios of Step I, Step II and
Step III non-construction costs to total construction costs for facil-
ities sampled in this study. Note that national average ratios for a
particular non-construction cost item may be lower than the regional
figures since some projects had no expenditures for certain items. While
there were 455 sewer projects sampled, only non-construction costs from
those built independent of plants were included in this table. For plant
-------
5-6
and sewer projects covered under the same grant, non-construction costs
were lumped together and unidentifiable for either plant or sewer por-
tions only.
In addition to Step III non-construction costs the percentage
of construction costs for Step I and Step II grants have also been
analyzed. Based only on projects which have proceeded through individual
Step I, II and III phases, the percentages indicated at the bottom of
Table 6.4 were calculated. Step I and II percentages were then added to
the Step III non-construction cost percentages to yield total project
non-construction cost percenages for new wastewater conveyance systems as
indicated on the bottom of Table 6.5.
-------
6.0 RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS
-------
6-1
6.0 RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS
The following wastewater conveyance system cost relationships
have been developed from a data base of 455 sanitary sewer construction
\
projects. The types and details of data collected for each facility
allow a multitude of cost relationships and other correlations to be
produced. Those presented in this chapter were thought to be the most
relevant and usable to the cost estimating user community.
A survey of the tables and figures will indicate that, while some
categories of cost data are founded on a significant number of bid items,
others are weakly supported and must be used with caution or, possibly,
not at all. The number of data points used to calculate average costs
for each item is shown in parentheses beside the unit cost. In some
cases tables or costs were included which contain relatively little
actual data. This was done for two reasons: first, to emphasize the
uncertainty of data presented and, second, to provide criteria and format
for future additions to this data base by the EPA as more construction
history becomes available. Obviously, construction practices, needs
and conditions in certain areas may preclude widespread use of certain
sizes or types of sewer pipe; thus, the lack of data for various items in
tables such as Table 6.1 will inherently reflect the construction prac-
tices of the various EPA regions.
-------
6-2
The cost relationships are compiled in tabular form (rather than
as families of curves) to allow side-by-side presentation of average unit
costs and the number of points (N) upon which it is based. Tables 6.1
and 6.2 are summaries of Appendix D tables in which costs are tabulated
by EPA region to facilitate cost estimation for construction cost com-
parison purposes. Also in Appendix D, unit costs per foot of pipe are
broken into categories for pipe, appurtenances and non-construction
costs. Due to the variation in parameters such as depth and pipe type
from table to table, the user should check to ensure use of the correct
cost category when using Chapter 6 or Appendix D information.
6.1 GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER: IN-PLACE COSTS
The unit cost of pipe including materials and labor (i.e. in-place)
is added to appurtenance cost on a per foot basis and non-const ruction
cost on a per foot basis to yield total, in-place gravity sewer cost by
diameter as shown in Table 6.1. Section 5.3 describes the appurtenance
and non-construction cost items which are included in the per foot cost
of gravity pipe in this section. Costs are presented in Table 6.1 for
various types and depths of pipe as well as for construction in and out
of Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSAs).
Table 6.2 is a tabulation of in-place, gravity sewer costs for
each pipe type at various ranges of depth. This table allows comparison
of the cost of specific pipe types and indicates the relative increase in
cost due to increasing pipe depths. While increasing depth and diameter
-------
6-3
of sewer pipe should be reflected by increasing cost per foot, this is
not shown in some specific cases in Tables 6.1 and 6.2. Reasons for
these inconsistencies were difficult to determine and in many cases could
not be resolved. Scarcity of data for a particular classification may
cause unusually high costs for a few bid items such as trench shoring or
dewatering to have disproportionately greater effect on national average
costs. For instance, the cost of 6 inch diameter vitrified clay pipe at
depths greater than 15 feet from Table 6.2 is the average of only three
bid items. Likewise the average per foot costs for 27 and 30 inch VC
pipe in the same depth range seem inconsistent. While detailed analysis
of the design plans and specifications for the projects represented in
these averages would probably explain this inconsistency, this level of
analysis was not possible in this study. Obviously, use of such costs
for estimating purposes should be avoided.
The data presented in Tables 6.1 and 6.2 are a summary of the tables
presented in Appendix D which provide breakdowns of unit costs by EPA
Region and by material, appurtenance and non-construction costs.
6.2 NON-PIPE AND APPURTENANCE COSTS
A significant portion of final, in-place construction cost for
sanitary sewer facilities results from non-pipe expenses for items listed
on Table 6.3 The total percentage (111%) indicates that non-pipe and
appurtenance expenses are actually more costly than the materials and
labor for pipe installation. Percentages developed for this table are
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(includes all appurtenances and all non-construction costs)
PIPE TYPE
Asbestos Vitrified Cast Reinforced Ductile
PVC Cement Clay Iron Concrete Iron Other
14.53 (17) 9.07 ( 5) 15.21 ( 14) 8.64 ( 5) 14.85 ( 4) 10.76 ( 2)
15.59 (25) 22.00 ( 11) 23.24 (104) 30.08 ( 12) 17.14 ( 4) 27.62 ( 15) 17.93 ( 9)
54.51 (91) 34.85 (203) 30.82 (519) 35.51 ( 49) 20.59 ( 11) 49.63 ( 86) 25.05 ( 60)
36.16 (64) 42.57 (162) 37.81 (292) 44.23 ( 34) 23.30 ( 9) 46.47 ( 50) 37.36 ( 50)
61.20 (42) 54.54 (133) 48.29 (301) 56.16 ( 44) 51.14 ( 30) 66.89 ( 44) 41.76 ( 47)
40.15 (17) 76.72 ( 63) 57.37 (128) 149.90 ( 4) 74.73 ( 78) 63.43 ( 3) 52.74 ( 33)
96.27 ( 24) 90.02 ( 14) 81.55 ( 9) 72.50 ( 9) 63.93 ( 32) 75.73 ( 4)
41.73 ( 1) 75.34 ( 86) 68.43 (132) 93.02 ( 14) 84.89 (124) 84.71 ( 48) 61.67 ( 23)
112.34 ( 30) 80.33 ( 56) 206.25 ( 1) 95.48 (112) 56.91 ( 1) 61.17 ( 11)
116.09 ( 40) 90.05 ( 75) 191.36 ( 16) 98.99 (227) 113.83 ( 39) 96.02 ( 34)
124.19 ( 18) 127.11 ( 69) 113.77 ( 11)
256.37 ( 2) 148.81 ( 20) 138.78 (224) 143.47 ( 19) 143.66 ( 15)
— — 160.76 ( 15) 187.01 (243) 229.86 ( 11) 183.57 ( 19)
117.04 ( 3) 234.60 (124) 371.79 ( 11) 198.11 ( 6)
— - 159.61 ( 4) 260.40 ( 83) 314.47 ( 1)
261.56 ( 61) 367.88 ( 2)
364.50 ( 89) 306.61 ( 12)
370.06 ( 36)
_,- 412.02 ( 69)
438.52 ( 31) — 915.96 ( 3)
779. 78 ( 6)
«.— — — ~— — —— — — — 53729(3) — — __—
465.56 ( 1)
(257) (759) (1695) (188) (1647) (359) (342)
< 8 Feet 8-15 Feet > 15 Feet
12.37 ( 1) 13.15 ( 7)
16.38 ( 7) 24.24 ( 48) 33.73 ( 6)
21.76 (133) 30.85 (637) 44.31 (277)
27.09 ( 75) 36.90 (407) 51.35 (173)
37.28 ( 59) 45.40 (344) 61.35 (173)
41.67 ( 33) 61.90 (188) 71.08 ( 85)
57.72 ( 9) 75.43 ( 42) 80.40 ( 21)
60.80 ( 46) 67.00 (227) 73.93 (113)
89.86 ( 14) 87.05 ( 97) 101.29 ( 69)
82.27 ( 26) 93.45 (205) 107.73 (142)
96.60 ( 4) 109.78 ( 39) 117.55 ( 44)
136.54 ( 19) 122.27 (114) 132.31 (119)
197.96 ( 9) 150.61 (108) 160.08 (118)
364.40 ( 1) 193.62 ( 35) 254.25 ( 53)
176.86 ( 1) 190.12 ( 12) 292.69 ( 23)
207.12 ( 14) 282.19 ( 30)
323.81 ( 22) 319.66 ( 59)
287.48 ( 1) 377.66 ( 12)
369.83 ( 5) 423.73 ( 23)
(437) (2552) (1540)
SMSA
13.50 ( 49)
28.43 (150)
39.35 (542)
39.02 (364)
53.47 (394)
72.44 (239)
79.78 ( 52)
90.61 (282)
94.86 ( 95)
118.01 (227)
133.21 ( 77)
146.18 (213)
213.57 (189)
259.18 ( 81)
283.28 ( 75)
265.97 ( 62)
390.67 ( 73)
366.36 ( 36)
422.21 ( 41)
479.42 ( 35)
618.99 ( 14)
620.27 ( 4)
730.55 ( 3)
(3297)
Non-SHSA
11.08 < 68)
19.23 (182)
30.99 (899)
41.88 (524)
47.33 (432)
52.89 (199)
79.30 ( 49)
69.07 (251)
89.59 (133)
92.20 (256)
95.57 ( 54)
133.11 (125)
158.21 (127)
264.15 63)
231.99 29)
238.25 4)
356.11 40)
436.82 7)
436.25 ( 22)
(3464)
National
Average
12.09 (117)
23.38 (332)
32.75 (1436)
40.30 (887)
49. .19 (825)
59.52 (436)
79.55 (101)
80.47 (533)
89.23 (238)
104.15 (485)
117.69 (131)
141.35 (338)
189.19 (322)
249.01 (155)
268.98 (104)
264.29 ( 66)
378.44 (113)
377.83 ( 43)
411.37 ( 73)
479.42 ( 35)
618.99 ( 14)
620.27 ( 4)
730.55 ( 3)
(6791)
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
78
84
90
96
Total
Note: Numbers in parentehsis indicate the sample size
-------
Table 6.2
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(includes all appurtenances and all non-construction costs)
PVC
ASBESTOS CEMENT
VITRIFIED CLAY
Diameter
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
Total
< 8 Ft. 8-15 Ft. > 15 Ft.
11.63 < 6) 13.99 ( 1)
25.14 ( 7) 51.40 ( 44) 70.02 ( 22)
25.91 ( 5) 39.36 ( 32) 38.12 ( 16)
19.32 ( 2) 35.16 ( 20) 48.17 ( 8)
27.75 ( 2) 38.69 ( 11) 60.05 ( 1)
( 16) (113) ( 48)
< 8 Ft. 8-15 Ft. > 15 Ft.
27.90 ( 4)
23.61 ( 26) 28.05 (101) 37.66 ( 48)
28.40 ( 15) 33.86 ( 84) 51.42 ( 46)
39.06 ( 13) 44.13 ( 75) 72.53 ( 34)
48.22 ( 7) 52.54 ( 31) 81.25 ( 23)
72.15 ( 14) 81.21 ( 6)
61.91 ( 10) 76.24 ( 51) 78.87 ( 25)
105.44 ( 3) 108.07 ( 16) 123.01 ( 10)
162.27 ( 1) 97.23 ( 26) 150.26 ( 13)
256.37 ( 2)
( 75) (404) (205)
< 8 Ft. 8-15 Ft. > 15 Ft.
15.94 ( 4) 25.23 ( 21) 46.26 ( 3)
21.46 ( 47) 29.51 (247) 38.99 (108)
23.40 ( 23) 37.48 (151) 47.69 ( 50)
38.01 ( 18) 46.33 (143) 57.71 ( 67)
51.24 ( 12) 58.40 ( 64) 82.81 ( 18)
70.02 ( 1) 89.80 ( 8) 94.39 ( 5)
62.63 ( 12) 73.39 ( 71) 101.80 ( 21)
46.91 ( 3) 72.82 ( 191 107.43 ( 17)
74.69 ( 4) 87.19 ( 36) 101.44 ( 17)
70.98 ( 1) 74.04 ( 4) 80.16 ( 6)
71.51 ( 2) 78.46 ( 4)
94.44 ( 1) 110.26 ( 9)
(125) (767) ("325)
i
Ul
Note: Numbers in parentheses indicate the sample size.
-------
Table ft.?. (cOFil: J nucd)
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(includes all appurtenances and all non-construction costs)
CAST IRON
REINFORCED CONCRETE
DUCTILE IRON
Diameter
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
in
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
Total
< 8 Ft. 8-15 Ft. > 15 Ft.
_.
22.39 ( 1) 17.98 ( 2)
24.11 ( 4) 32.40 ( 17) 47.65 ( 1)
27.08 ( 4) 39.01 ! 11) 60.59 ( 2)
45.03 ( 2) 48.18 ( 14) 61.94 ( 3)
43.39 ( 1) 109.17 ( 5)
77.14 ( 5) 141.10 ( 1)
104.45 ( 2) 118.33 ( 5)
rpf> ("35) ('">
c S Ft. 8-15 Ft. > 15 Ft.
12.37 ( 1) 15.68 ( 3)
14.66 ( 1) 17.97 ( 3)
16.68 ( 1) 19.99 ( 3)
79.53 ( 2) 24.95 ( 3) 30.22 ( 1)
34.20 ( 5) 36.20 ( 2)
82.82 ( 5) 57.03 ( 29) 55.53 ( 24)
49.09 ( 1) 70.31 ( 2) 67.08 ( 5)
124.20 ( 7) 69.28 ( 47) 69.32 ( 34)
123.46 ( 6) 89.96 ( 49) 94.69 ( 41!
53.11 ( 8) 88.18 ( 94) 96.73 ( 84)
119.43 ( 2) 130.90 ( 20) 128.15 ( 30)
108.58 ( 8) 110.42 ( 80) 134.43 ( 94)
202.32 ( 6) 147.40 ( 88) 163.70 ( 96)
168.79 ( 28) 245.46 ( 46)
176.86 ( 1) 190.12 ( 12) 292.69 ( 23)
207.12 ( 14) 279.86 ( 29)
327.81 ( 19) 321.53 ( 50)
287.48 ( 1) 377.66 ( 12)
369.83 ( 5) 423.73 ( 23)
("49) (505) (594")
< 8 Ft. 8-15 Ft. > 15 Ft.
_
38.16 ( 1)
31.76 ( 9) 46.04 ( 25) 93.73 ( 8)
25.76 ( 5) 56.90 ( 17) 74.79 ( 3)
42.47 ( 4) 69.32 ( 7) 82.76 ( 10)
55.88 ( 1)
55.41 ( 4) 61.28 ( 11) 78.78 ( 5)
49.37 ( 4) 91.51 ( 12) 89.48 ( 18)
81.08 ( 3) 108.19 ( 15) 150.40 ( 13)
138.19 ( 2) 155.10 ( 9) 122.37 ( 5)
268.16 ( 1) 274.32 ( 4) 282.02 ( 1)
364.40 ( 1) 371.71 ( 4) 389.81 ( 4!
(33) (106) ("67)
< 8 Ft. 8-15 Ft. - 15 Ft.
19.45 ( 2)
16.86 ( 6) 23.00 ( 28) 28.20 ( 12) jy.
25.28 ( 3) 29.79 ( 24) 40.72 ( 11) I
26.44 ( 2) 31.88 ( 13) 52.88 ( 17)
65.35 ( 1) 54.01 ( 9) 63.38 ( 8)
108.00 ( 1) 59.32 ( 7) 60.87 ( 5)
57.90 ( 4) 50.26 ( 1)
85.63 ( 1) 82.29 ( 9) 86.67 ( 11)
105.08 ( 2) 120.33 ( 5)
101.69 ( 4)
157.03 ( 6) 171.74 ( 8)
187.94 ( 3) 208.28 ( 3)
349.90 ( 1)
298.51 ( 3) 309.31 ( 9)
f!4) (114) (111)
-------
6-7
TABLE 6,3
AVERAGE NON-PIPE COSTS AS
PERCENT OP TOTAL IN-PLACE PIPE COST
Category Percent of Pipe Cost
Sanitary Sewer Miscellaneous Appurtenances 8
Manholes 36
Manholes, Drop Type 2
Thoroughfare Crossings 15
Stream Crossings 1
Rock Excavation 2
Pavement Removal & Replacement 14
Special Bedding 1
Miscellaneous Costs not Categorized 31
Utility Reconnection & Removal 01
Total: 111
Other categories of non-pipe costs were less than one percent
of pipe cost and were not included in this table.
-------
6-8
national averages for all types, diameters and depths of pipe and can be
expected to vary widely for specific construction conditions. Fewer
manholes in rural areas, need for extensive rock excavation and greater
numbers of road crossings in urban areas are typical factors which
would affect percentages for given projects.
6.3 NON-CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Another significant expense associated with gravity sewer con-
struction are costs for Step I, Step II and Step III non-construction
items. Step I costs under PL 92-500 provide for facility planning and
economic comparison of treatment and conveyance alternatives. Step II
funds pay for detailed design and specification development for the
cost-effective alternative selected at the Step I phase. Based on the
project data collected for this study, average Step I and Step II costs
are presented in Table 6.4 as a percentage of the total construction
cost. Projects included in this table must have had both Step I and Step
II costs. Projects without separate Step I and II costs often had these
costs included in other categories, thus making such projects inappropri-
ate for future cost comparison. Only a relatively few recent projects
have progressed through all three steps, thus explaining the scarcity of
data employed in Table 6.4.
Additional non-construction costs are incurred as part of the Step
III construction phase. Table 6.5 lists the non-construction items and
the percentage of each of total construction cost. There were no
-------
TABLE 6.4
REGION AVE STEP I/TCC
01
02
03
.1474
.0252
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
.0479
.0499
: STEP I COST/TOTAL CC
! STEP II COST/TOTAL C
# WITH STEP I AVE
0
0
0
1
12
2
0
3
0
0
DNSTRUC
XJNSTRU
STEP I
.0843
.0445
.0310
.0679
.0612
.0512
.1696
.2088
.0386 - Weighted
Average
18
.0920
# WITH STEP II
0
1
1
1
4
3
3
4
1
0
18
*Developed from data for new sanitary sewer facilities with both Step I and Step II
grants for sewer construction only.
-------
TABLE 6.5
NON-CONSTRUCTION COST/TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (NCC/TCC)
FOR SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
Non-Construction
Item Description
Region Region Region Region Region
12345
Region Region Region Region Region National Sample
8
10
Average
Size
Administrative/Legal . 0060
Preliminary —
Land, Structures, .0081
Right-of-way
Architect/Engineer —
Basic Fees
Other Architect/
Engineer Fees
Project Inspection
Relocation Payments to
Individuals and
Businesses
Bond Interest
Contingency . 0 3 08
Indirect Costs
Miscellaneous
Equipment
Other Eligible Costs
.0227
—
—
. 0051
—
.0386
—
—
.0685
—
.0017
.0001
—
.0213
—
.0073
.1298
—
.0121
—
.0025
.0503
—
.0015
.0008
.0018
.0172
—
.0158
.0263
—
.0145
—
.0017
.0589
—
.0069
—
.0014
.0022
—
.0019
.0608
.0240
.0003
—
—
.0266
.0025
.0025
—
.0003
.0067
—
.0048
.0128
.0037
.0254
.0134
—
.0625
—
—
—
—
.0288
—
.0084
.0217
.0044
.0531
—
—
.0447
—
—
—
—
.0099
—
—
.0180
.0209
.0412
—
—
.0629
—
.0045
—
—
.0098
.0006
—
.0815
—
.0070
—
—
.0604
—
—
—
.0321
.0136
.0188
.0017
—
—
.0528
—
—
.0421
—
.0211
.0030
.0052
.0113
.0007
.0030
.0368
.0113
.0147
.0006
.0006
.0450
.0009
.0031
.0003
.0041
137
7
24
14
6
47
2
5
151
6
12
7
13
Note: None of the projects sampled required expenses for Land
Removal
Average Total Step III NCC: .1324
Average Step I: .0386
Average Step II: .0920
Average Total Project NCC: .2630
Development, Relocation Expenses or Demolition and
-------
6-11
expenses incurred for land development, relocation expenses (to municipal
authorities) and demolition and removal for the projects sampled in this
study. Average Step I and Step II costs are added to the total national
average Step III non-construction cost on Table 6.5 to show average total
non-construction cost.
6.4 FORCE MAIN COSTS
Table 6.6 is a tabulation of average per foot construction costs
for pressurized sanitary sewer. Unlike Tables 6.1 and 6.2, costs on
Table 6.6 do not include allowances for appurtenances or non-construction
costs. Unit prices are for force main in-place, including materials and
labor costs for pipe only. This variation is necessitated by the wide
variety of construction conditions under which force main is built,
ranging from inexpensive construction in areas with little elevation
difference to expensive stream or thoroughfare crossings. Such variation
would tend to obscure the relative difference in pipe construction
costs.
Care should be exercised in using this table since a comparatively
small percentage of the total footage of sanitary sewer construction is
force main and, as a result, average costs in Table 6.6 are based on
relatively few data points.
6.5 PUMPING STATION COSTS
Construction bid costs were collected for over 500 sanitary sewer
pumping stations ranging in capacity from 0.1 MGD to over 100 MGD and
-------
Table 6.6
FdKCE MAIN SANITARY SFWER'ii
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE IN-PL ACE
IHAM kl.G 0:1 REG 02 RE.G 03 REG 04 REO OS KEG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 0V REG 10 NATIONAL
01 * tO. 8 6 * ,00 * 3,47 $ ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * .00 *
N- 1 N~ 0 N- 6 N== 0 N= 0 N" 0 N= 0 N= 0 N== 0 N= 0
02 * .00 $ .00 * 2,96 * 1,27 % 6.38 * 2.62 * ,00 * .00 $ .1. ,96 * .00 '-H 3.85
N= 0 N-- 0 N" 10 N= 2 N" 8 N== 2 N-- 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 24
03 $ .00 * .00 * 2.95 * .00 * 8,82 * ,00 * ,00 * 4,03 * 5.87 $ .00 * 6.66
N= 0 N-~ 0 N= 2 N== 0 N= 5 N= 0 N~ 0 N= 1 N== 1 N= 0 N= 9
04 * 12,24 $ 12,19 * 8,88 $ 3,87 * 9.08 * 4,76 * 7,52 * 3,55 * 14-09 * 10.39 * 8,54
N== 5 N= 7 N= 31 N" 8 N~ 45 N= 12 N= 3 N= 6 N= 5 N= 5 N= 127
06 * 15.54 * 16.24 * 14.15 * 5.39 * 10.53 * 7.20 * 10,79 * .00 * 9,76 * 13.06 * 11.22
N= 9 N= 8 N= 30 N= 12 N= 57 N-- 15 N= 3 N= 0 N= 4 N= 5 N= 143
08 * .1.9,94 * 12,64 * 13,08 $ 6.67 * 14,4.7 $ 13,58 * .00 * 7,88 * 20,62 * 12,72 * 13,43
N- 4 N~ 3 N= 3.1. N= 12 N~ 30 N== 15 N= 0 N= 1 N= 6 N== 3 N= 105
10 * 18.18 $ 18.53 * 16.80 * 8,62 * .1.7.13 * 13.59 * 18,75 $ .00 * 17.47 * 29.64 * 17.66
N= 6 N= 3 N= 8 N= 5 N= 11 N= 8 N= 1 N= 0 N= 1 N= 7 .N= 50
12 * .1.9,83 $ 59.91 * 28.82 $ 22,58 * 24.62 * 14,74 * ,00 * ,00 $ 27.80 $ .00 * 30.62
N= 3 N= 6 N== 6 N= 1 N= 15 N~ 2 N<= 0 N~ 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 34
14 * 31.27 * 25.72 * 26,48 * 30.29 * 23.77 * 28,02 * .00 * 33,96 * 34,99 * .00 $ 27.B9
N= 1 N= 4 N= 3 N= 1 N= 5 H- 3 N= 0 N= .1. N= 3 N= 0 N= 21
16 * .00 $ 33,79 * 24,37 $ 25.85 * 28.31 * 17,52 * 21,64 * .00 * 31.08 $ ,00 $ 27,63
N= 0 N= 5 N-- 4 N~ 3 N= 10 N= 2 N= 1 N== 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 27
18 * 57.94 $ 29.11 * 26,77 * .00 * 27.11 * 21,00 $ ,00 * ,00 * 38,66 * ,00 * 31,90
N= 1 N= 4 N-- 1 N~ 0 N-~ 4 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N== 3 N= 0 N= 14
20 * .00 * 45,02 * 37,82 $ ,00 * 34,30 * 22.45 * .00 t ,00 * 62.38 $ ,00 * 40.69
N= 0 N- 8 N~ 1 N== 0 N= 10 N-- 3 N-- 0 N== 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 26
21 $ .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 $ .00 $ 53,68 $ ,00 $ 53.68
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N~ 0 N= 0 N-- 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 1
24 * 1.57.10 * 62.30 * 29,88 * 44.18 * 45.67 * .00 * ,00 $ ,00 * 75,33 $ .00 * 60.51
N- 2 N'= 11 N"- 2 N= 2 N= 10 N== 0 N~ 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 29
30 * ,00 * 129.86 * 51,57 * 63.84 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * ,00 * ,00 * 92,76
N= 0 N-- 6 N= 4 N= 2 N= 0 N- 0 N- 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 12
:',/•, * ,OO * 117 ,'?:Z * .OO $ 87,67 t 61-18 t .00 't- ,00 f , OO t|i 99,48 $ ,00 * 109,51
(J~ O N-- 10 N=- o M™ .1. N= 1. N= 0 M~- O N~= O N=- .1. N= 0 N= ' i 3
-------
10.0
FIGURE 6.1
1-i-tmtttttatntHjgi
PUMPING STATIONS
CONSTRUCTION COST VS. DESIGN CAPACI
CONSTRUCTION COST
.01
I
I—'
CO
.001
.005 .01
.05 .10
.50 1.0
5.0 10.0
50.0 100.0
DESIGN CAPACITY CMGD)
(1000 M3/DAY = MGD/0.364)
-------
6-14
with pumping heads from 10 feet to over 100 feet. Figure 6.1 is a
plot of construction cost versus design capacity for all values of
pumping head. These curves and corresponding equations are the result
of linear regression curve fit analysis and are statistically valid to
the 95 percent confidence interval. While statistically valid, the data
base for pump stations is not detailed or consistent enough to define
usable curves for various heads. As a result, the average pumping
station cost curve is utilized in Chapter 7.0 cost estimating tech-
niques. Since cost estimating tables included in this report are
directed primarily at planning level estimates where a level of detail
providing pump station heads is usually not available, Figure 6.1 should
prove useful.
6.6 MATERIAL/LABOR COSTS
Often, in sanitary sewer construction bid tabulations, the material
and labor components were itemized and bid separately as gravity sewer
pipe and pipe installation costs, respectively. These data were tabu-
lated for SMSA and non-SMSA projects and are summarized in Tables 6.7 and
6.8 for various depth ranges.
While conclusions based on these tables cannot be final due to
the limited availability of data for some categories, interesting trends
are seen at this point. First, from Table 6.7 it appears that
smaller diameter pipe is somewhat less expensive for rural, non-SMSA
projects than those in more urban, SMSA areas. This trend seems to be
-------
Table 6.7
GRAVITY SEWERS
MATERIAL COMPONENT - COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
Diameter
04
06
08
10
12
14
15
16
18
20
21
24
27
30
33
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
84
Total
C SMSA
Non-SMSA
National Average
2.04
7.41
7.47
9.87
10.42
24.79
22.97
33.01
18.24
32.76
27.32
23.43
29.18
36.45
41.08
38.53
50.09
75.69
104.42
67.52
99.33
209.15
127.24
( 2)
( 8)
(52)
(27)
(40)
( 1)
(43)
(11)
(47)
( 6)
(26)
(37)
( 8)
(18)
( 2)
(31)
( 8)
(15)
(12)
(20)
(19)
(17)
( 1)
5.
4.
6.
10.
13.
17.
10.
17.
13.
27.
18.
34.
35.
61.
52.
51.
98.
206.
—
—
—
—
—
92
96
86
15
09
85
62
80
40
68
15
77
28
00
65
69
03
44
-
-
-
-
-
(11)
(30)
(67)
(32)
(29)
( 6)
(15)
( 7)
(25)
( 4)
( 6)
(11)
( 8)
(10)
( 3)
(13)
( 5)
( 1)
5.58
5.70
7.09
9.99
11.54
17.89
19.71
25.72
15.64
30.05
24.23
27.44
31.15
44.57
46.45
43.92
60.80
81.46
104.42
67.52
99.33
209.15
127.24
(13)
(38)
(119)
(59)
(69)
( 7)
(58)
(18)
(72)
(10)
(32)
(48)
(16)
(28)
( 5)
(44)
(13)
(16)
(12)
(20)
(19)
( 7)
( 1)
I
)—'
Ul
(451)
(283)
(734)
Note: Numbers in parentheses indicate the sample size.
-------
Table 6.8
GRAVITY SEWERS
LABOR COMPONENT - COST PER FOOT OF PIPE BY DEPTH
SMSA
Diameter
04
06
08
10
12
15
18
20
21
24
27
30
33
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
Total
7
8
11
8
6
7
12
16
11
8
11
18
26
26
<8
—
. 14
.24
.23
.54
.14
.12
, 14
.07
.08
.61
.06
.74
—
—
—
.78
.77
—
Ft.
( 6)
( 3)
( 5)
( 2)
( 2)
( 1)
( 1)
( 2)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
(28)
8-15
9.87
11.12
11.26
12.71
19.69
27.91
28.11
11.38
25.20
26.37
25.80
18.02
12.74
30.31
59.23
59.23
78.23
31.12
29.46
—
Ft.
( 8)
( 2)
(42)
(15)
(29)
(32)
(44)
( 4)
( 5)
(29)
(20)
( 6)
( 6)
(23)
( 3)
( 7)
( 2)
( 2)
(281)
>
21.
34.
51.
56.
36.
25.
20.
41.
50.
31.
15.
47.
103.
126.
81.
52.
86.
142.
15
—
50
72
28
31
46
84
56
47
66
57
83
28
65
65
85
10
93
70
Ft.
( 4)
( 1)
( 7)
(15)
(25)
( 6)
( 5)
(24)
(23)
( 7)
(12)
(26)
( 1)
(21)
(22)
( 5)
(13)
(10)
(227)
NON-SMSA
<8 Ft. 8-15
—
15.52 ( 9) 4
10
2.32 ( 1) 8
4
___ -J
—
__ -3
—
2.16 ( 1) 4
3
—
17.36 ( 2) 22
—
—
—
—
—
—
(13)
—
.97
.26
.96
.06
.39
—
.35
—
.10
.73
—
.55
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ft.
(36)
(14)
(13)
( 4)
( 9)
( 4)
( 4)
( 7)
(12)
(103)
5
23
21
5
4
5
4
5
6
15
9
>15
—
.87
.71
.33
.10
.30
—
.81
.98
.96
.97
—
.02
.95
—
—
—
—
—
Ft.
(18)
( 4)
( 8)
( 2)
( 9)
( 5)
( 4)
( 2)
(10)
(23)
( 6)
(91)
NATIONAL AVERAGE
<8 Ft.
11
8
10
8
6
7
12
16
5
8
11
17
43
26
26
—
.10
.24
.12
.54
.14
.12
.14
.07
.57
.61
.06
.94
.77
—
—
.78
.77
—
(15)
( 3)
( 6)
( 2)
( 2)
( 1)
( 1)
( 2)
( 2)
( 1)
( 1)
( 3)
( 1)
( 1)
( 1)
(42)
8-15
9.87
11.12
6.38
12.27
15.21
25.25
26.11
11.38
12.39
26.37
17.45
8.87
12.74
27.93
59.23
59.23
78.23
31.12
29.46
—
Ft.
( 8)
( 2)
(78)
(29)
(42)
(36)
(53)
( 4)
( 9)
(29)
(24)
(13)
( 6)
(35)
( 3)
( 2)
( 7)
( 2)
( 2)
(384)
>15 Ft.
8
31
30
35
29
25
11
34
48
13
15
31
11
126
81
52
86
142
„
—
.41 (22)
.90 ( 5)
.99 (15)
.36 (17)
.58 (34)
.84 (6)
.23 (10)
.73 (28)
.88 (25)
.01 (17)
.83 (12)
.28 (49)
.29 ( 7)
.65 (21)
.85 (22)
.10 (5)
.93 (13)
.70 (10)
(318)
Note: Numbers in parentheses indicate the sample size
-------
6-17
reversed above 21 inch diameter, with non-SMSA pipe costs consistently
exceeding those of SMSA projects. A second trend, evident in Table 6.8,
indicates the higher cost of labor for all depths of sewer in SMSA areas
compared to non-SMSA areas. Although this could be expected and ex-
plained by the complexity of construction in urban areas and higher wage
rates due to unionization, the relative differences indicated by these
data are nevertheless interesting. Again, such inferences are not
conclusive and must be reevaluated as more construction history becomes
available.
6.7 Typical Small Community Per Capita Lengths and Costs
Using sanitary sewer information from this study, Table 6.9 was
produced to illustrate the variation in per capita lengths and costs for
construction projects in small communities. Projects were selected only
if the collector and interceptor system was designed for the entire
population of the town. In rural communities, waste flows from residents
on the outskirts of town may not be cost-effective to collect and treat,
although the cost burden is shared with those considered part of the
design population. For such cases, actual per capita costs may vary from
those shown to the degree that design population varies from the popula-
tion sharing the cost burden.
Since bid information was collected from EPA Step III grant files
without reference to project plans or specifications, the classification
of sewer pipe as collector or interceptor was not possible. As a result,
-------
TABLE 6.9
TYPICAL SMALL COMMUNITY PER CAPITA LENGTHS AND COSTS
Community
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Population
4000
1500
1865
5000
4500
4500
6400
3950
3900
513
Collector Length
Per Capita (ft/cap)
18.6
27.2
21.6
25.3
10.5
10.9
20.0
11.3
12.2
68.6
Interceptor Length
Per Capita (ft/cap)
6.5
18.1
7.4
5.0
7.1
1.1
3.1
1.7
2.2
/T^.
©
Bid
Date
6/28/78
2/12/76
12/11/73
12/31/73
6/16/75
6/01/76
6/30/76
5/28/76
10/16/75
4/19/75
Per Capita^
Cost ($/cap)
229
753
650
656
814
176
1195
541
618
594
25% Community
Share ($/cap)
57
188
163
164
204
44
299
135
155
149
I
I—'
00
Notes:
(J) Costs per capita are for the date of the construction bid and include Step I, Step II and Step III non-construction
costs.
(2) Collector and interceptor sewers are all 8" diameter and therefore indistinguishable for this study.
© Community share per capita assumes 75% EPA Grant and no state assistance.
-------
6-19
per capita lengths for collector and interceptor shown in Table 6.9 were
developed assuming collector to be pipe less than or equal to 8 inch
diameter and interceptor all pipe greater than 8 inch diameter. Admit-
tedly, this assumption was arbitrary and did not consider the design
function of the sewer pipe. While total length per capita (collector and
interceptor) could be obtained by combining both per capita lengths from
Table 6.9, individual breakdowns as shown must be considered rough
estimates.
-------
7.0 SIMPLIFIED CONVEYANCE SYSTEM COST ESTIMATING TECHNIQUES
-------
7-1
7.0 SIMPLIFIED CONVEYANCE SYSTEM COST ESTIMATING TECHNIQUES
7.1 BACKGROUND
The Environmental Protection Agency, in accordance with Sections 516
(b) (2) and 205(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
of 1972 (PL 92-500), must submit a report to Congress before February,
10, 1979 entitled "1978 Cost Estimates for the Construction of Publicly-
Owned Wastewater Treatement Facilties." Commonly referred to as the
"Needs Survey," similar reports have been submitted to Congress in 1974,
1975 and 1977. The major objective of the 1978 Needs Survey is to
provide a comprehensive estimate of the total cost of meeting the water
pollution control goals of the Act. Included in this report will be cost
estimates on a facility by facility basis for Category IVA and IVB needs,
collector and interceptor systems respectively.
In the process of developing cost estimates for new sewer facili-
ties, the most accurate cost information available is to be employed. A
majority of the facilities reviewed will have cost information available
based on completed Step I facilities planning or other similar engineer-
ing criteria. However, in many cases specific plans and cost estimates
will not have been developed.
One of the objectives of the present study was to provide construc-
tion cost estimating criteria to be used in the 1978 Needs Survey for
facilities in this latter case. In developing cost estimates for these
conveyance systems based on previous bid data, three criteria were
considered important:
-------
7-2
1. The resultant cost curves and procedures had to be broad in
scope and applicable to a wide range of construction conditions.
2. Cost estimating methods had to be flexible enough to be applied
coast to coast yet technically consistent providing national
uniformity.
3. Methods were to be straightforward, facilitating utilization by
a variety of users.
The following cost estimating procedures include curves and tables
,.>•?>•
described below and are presented in the belief that the lay public often
has need to estimate treatment plant construction costs.
7.2 SANITARY SEWER COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES
Table 7.1 - Sanitary Sewer Costs
Table 7.1 was produced using the data base outlined in Section 6.0
of this report; it lists per foot costs for a range of diameters of
gravity sewers. Costs presented in this table have been updated to first
quarter 1978 dollars using the EPA CUSS Index. The 1978 Needs Survey
cost table includes allowances in the per foot pipe costs for Step I and
Step II as well as Step III non-construction costs such as administra-
tive, legal, inspection and contingency expenses. In addition, these
costs include allowances for typical quantities of appurtenances such as
V'S
manholes, pavement removal and replacement, and special bedding.
-------
7-3
Table 7.2 - Sizing of Collector Sewers
Those using Needs Survey Procedures for cost estimates probably will
have minimal background information available. Collected populations and
rough lengths of sewer required will often be the only available data.
In such cases, Table 7.2 may be employed to estimate the pipe diameter
needed. The design discharge (collected) flow may be estimated by
multiplying the population served by an average per capita 'flow, say
100 gallons per person per day. Industrial flow, if known, may be added
also.
The pipe diameter from Table 7.2 will be used to enter Table 7.1.
While actual constructed systems would consist of a range of sizes and
include pipe smaller than the diameter indicated by Table 7.2, this size
will be used for all pipe due to the lack of detailed data.
Figure 7.1 - Pump Station Costs
This curve provides total construction costs for pump stations as a
function of average design capacity. No definition by head pumped is
provided since information on such would normally not be available at
this level of planning. Likewise, the number and size of pump stations
is not likely to be known. In such instances, data from neighboring
community systems may provide usable information. In cases where no
information is available, Needs Survey procedures allow one pump station
(sized to handle the maximum flow for the calculated pipe diameter from
Table 7.2) for each 18,000 total feet of collector and interceptor sewer.
-------
7-4
This is an extremely rough estimate based on nationally averaged con-
structed facilities and should be used only as a last resort.
Table 7.3 - Sanitary Sewer Construction Multipliers
The in-place, per-foot pipe costs listed in Table 7.1 are national
average costs and should be adjusted to reflect the relative construction
history of the given community. Table 7.3 lists area multipliers to be
applied to collector, interceptor and pump station costs. These were
computed from costs based on firm engineering estimates and costs of
comparable construction for over 500 data points as reported in the 1976
Needs Survey.
Map 7.1 - Sanitary Sewer Area Multiplier Map
Map 7.1 has been developed to define areas of influence of the
cities listed in Table 7.3. County or State boundaries were followed in
all cases. For the many areas not close to a reference city, labor rate
histories were correlated using the system described in Appendix C to
define boundary locations.
Table 7.4 - Sanitary Sewer Cultural Modifiers
The cost of sanitary sewer construction changes considerably with
variation in site conditions. Costs in congested urban areas with many
underground utilities, heavy traffic loading and higher unionization
rates are generally much higher than costs in open country or rural
communities.
-------
7-5
Using data from the 455 sewer facilities analyzed in Section 6.0
factors defining such construction cost variation were developed.
Multipliers listed in Table 7.4 are to be used for sewer and pump station
construction costs based on anticipated construction conditions.
To produce cost estimates - for planned sanitary sewer facilities
using the tables and curves the following information is required:
1. Population and per capita sewage flows. From this information
design flow may be estimated. More specific information, such
as pipe diameters or lengths, domestic and industrial sewage
flows is desirable but often not available.
2. Geographical construction setting e.g. open country, residential
streets, etc.
3. Total lengths of collector and interceptor sewer required.
It was assumed that specific design information such as pipe depth
and pipe type (vitrified clay, asbestos cement, etc.) would not be
known in the planning stage at which these cost estimating procedures are
utilized. Usually, such specific data are not available until prelim-
inary or even final design is completed; in such instances engineers'
cost estimates would replace these procedures.
Likewise, the number, size and total head of required pumping
stations rarely would be known and estimates for pumping stations parame-
ters must be produced by other methods including:
-------
7-6
1. Data on number and size of pumping stations for geographically
similar collector and/or interceptor facilities in neighboring
communities.
2. Rough estimates based on initial survey of the community to be
served by the planned system.
Note that if number one above yields usable pumping station data it
may also provide more accurate length and cost data for sewer pipe
estimating. If no data on number and size of pump stations are avail-
able, the rule-of-thumb of one pump station per 18,000 feet of sewer may
be used.
Since estimates of sewer length may be unavailable, rough rules-of-
thumb of 16 feet of collector sewer per person and one foot of intercep-
tor sewer per foot of collector were developed from previous construction
data. Again, these are rules-of-thumb to be used only in the absence of
more reliable information.
7.3 SANITARY SEWER FACILITY COST ESTIMATE-EXAMPLE
The following is an example cost estimate developed using the tables
and curves just described. The limited amount of input data required
dictates that the resultant cost estimate be used for preliminary plann-
ing only.
-------
7-7
Requirement:
Collector and interceptor sewers are required for an eligible
residential population of 1,600 in Glendive, Montana. Flows from
sewered areas of the town indicate an average sewage flow of 90
gallons per person, including an allowance for infiltration and
inflow. Also, the town limits the smallest size of collector sewer
to 8 inches in diameter. No information is available on required
lengths of sewer, sizes or number of pump stations.
Solution:
Collector Sewer Costs:
1. Allowing 16 feet per person for collector sewer length:
Total Collector Length = 16 x 1,600 = 25,600 feet
Design Flow = 1,600 x 90 gpcd = 0.14 mgd
2. From Table 7.1:
For 8-inch Diameter Sewer Pipe at $43.00
per foot x 25,600 feet $ 1,101,000
3. From Table 7.3:
Seattle Area Multiplier x 1.0735
$ 1,182,000
4. From Table 7.4:
Suburban Residential Modifier x 0.91
5. Collector Sewer Cost Estimate: $ 1,075,000
-------
7-8
Interceptor Sewer Costs:
1. Allowing one foot of interceptor length for each 16 feet of
collector length:
Total Interceptor Length - 25,600/16 = 1,600 feet
2. Flow for 1,600 people at 90 gallons per capita per day:
Total Flow = 90 x 1,600 = 144,000 gpd
3. From Table 7.2 for 0.144 mgd:
Size of Interceptor = 8-inch diameter
4. From Table 7.1:
Cost of 8-inch Sewer in-place at $43.00
per foot x 1,600 feet $ 69,000
$ 69,000
5. From Table 7.3:
\
Seattle Area Multiplier x 1.0735
$ 74,000
6. From Table 7.4:
Suburban Residential Modifier x Q.91
7. Interceptor Sewer Cost Estimate: $ 67,000
Pumping Station Costs:
1. Allowing one pump station per 18,000 feet of collector and
interceptor sewer:
Collector + Interceptor Length = 25,600 + 1,600 = 27,200 feet.
27,200/18,000 = 1.5K2
Therefore, one pumping station is justified.
-------
7-9
2. From Figure 7.1:
Cost for one 0.170 mgd pumping station $ 25,000
3. From Table 7.3:
Seattle Area Multiplier x 1.0735
$ 26,838
4. From Table 7.4:
Surburban Residential Multiplier x 0.91
5. Pumping Station Cost Estimate: $ 24,422
Total Facility Cost $ 1,166,000
This estimate includes allowances for Step I, Step II and Step
III non-construction costs as well as costs for all associated appurt-
enances. Also, as the tables and figures are based on First Quarter 1978
dollars so the estimated cost is indexed to that quarter.
-------
7-10
TABLE 7.1
SANITARY SEWER COSTS
TOTAL IN-PLACE COSTS PER LINEAL FOOT*
(January 1978 Dollars)
Pipe Diameter Average Cost
(inches) ($/foot)
6 24
8 43
10 47
12 59
15 73
18 94
21 118
24 124
27 136
30 178
36 215
42 250
48 302
54 337
60 418
66 445
72 483
* Includes associated appurtenances and non-construction costs,
-------
7-11
TABLE 7.2
SIZING OF COLLECTOR AND
Design Discharge Range
(mgd)
0.08 or less
0.08 - 0.17
0.17 - 0.29
0.29 - 0.47
0.47 - 0.82
0.82 - 1.3
1.3 - 1.9
1.9 - 2.7
2.7 - 3.8
3.8 - 4.9
4.9 - 8.0
8.0 - 11.8
11.8 - 17.0
17.0 - 22.5
22.5 - 29.5
29.5 - 37.5
37.5 - 48.0
INTERCEPTOR SEWERS
Pipe Diameter
(inches)
6
8
10
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
-------
CO
Q:
o
Q
U_
O
CO
z:
o
10.0
CO
o
o
i-
o
D
cr
H-
co
z
o
o
o
I-
PUMPING STATIONS
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST VS. DESIGN CAPACITY
.005 -01
.05 JO .50 1.0
DESIGN CAPACITY (MGD)
(1000 M3/DAY = MGD/0.264)
5.0 10.0
50.0 100.0
i
h-1
S3
NOTE: TOTAL COST INCLUDES STEP I, II, AND III NON-CONSTRUCTION COSTS
-------
7-13
TABLE 7.3
SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION AREA MULTIPLIERS
REFERENCE: MAP 7.1
Area Code
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Area
111
112
113
114
TIT
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
Atlanta, Georgia
Baltimore, Maryland
Birmingha, Alabama
Boston, Massachusetts
Charlotte, North Carolina
Chicago, Illinois
Cincinnati, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
Dallas, Texas
•B-enver-, Colorado
Detroit, Michigan
Houston, Texas
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Miami, Florida
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Minneapolis, Minnesota
New Orleans, Louisiana
New York, New York
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
St. Louis, Missouri
San Francisco, California
Seattle, Washington
Trenton, New Jersey
Multiplier
0.8088
1.0147
0.7059
1.1176
0.5952
1.1324
1.0515
1.1324
0.7132
0.8088
1.1103
0.7868
0.9926
1.1691
0.8529
1.0000
0.9559
0.9853
1.2647
1.1912
1.0809
1.2132
1.1103
1.0735
1.0809
STATE AND TERRITORIAL MULTIPLERS
Alaska
Guam
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Trust Territories
2.6667
1.2465
1.2833
0.6290
0.9037
-------
LF.A. MUNICH? A! CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX, MAP
SANiTARY SEWER FACILITIES - CITY MULTIPLIERS
B-5;:;i4 > *"-K;^Cim;HiLADELpHi
j,W '..Cj PITTSBURGH Z&jijM SALTtMORE
11'-- -r -:'^^i5*?s&.;'
•^102%^
Mi'
-------
7-15
TABLE 7.4
SANITARY SEWER CULTURAL MODIFIERS
Cultural Definition Multiplier
Open Country 0.67
Suburban Residential 0.91
Dense Residential (within City limits) 1.08
Commercial/Industrial 1.20
-------
APPENDIX A
METHODOLOGY
-------
A-l
APPENDIX A
METHODOLOGY
A. 1 General
Based on a preliminary survey of potential sources of construction
bid data for wastewater conveyance systems, it was determined that the
EPA municipal construction grant files, located in the ten regional
offices, provided the most consistent and detailed cost information. A
more in-depth study of these files furnished information used to organize
the data collection effort and develop the data worksheet shown as Figure
A.I.
Basically, this worksheet is arranged to allow tabulation of general
facility information, total construction and non-construction costs
(first-order data) and costs for individual pipe and appurtenance items
(third-order data). A separate worksheet was completed for each facility
sampled. The completed worksheets were sent to a central location for
quality assurance and keypunching into the data base.
A.2 Worksheet Definitions
The following is a block by block description of the data fields
provided on the wastewater conveyance system worksheet, Figure A.I. To
facilitate data collection, many fields utilize coded items as shown on
Table A.I. This table should be used in conjunction with Figure A.I
and the following field descriptions:
-------
A-2
(1) Grant No. - This six-digit number indicates the particular
grant under which EPA funds are allotted for sanitary sewer
facilities. A grant may apply to both sewer and treatment needs;
however, only conveyance system costs were collected on this
worksheet.
(2) Facility Name - This is the commonly accepted title of the
wastewater conveyance system being constructed. Facilities
named as treatment plants may include sewer facilities and thus
be included in this study.
(3) City or Town - Indicated here is the name of the city in which
the facility is located.
(4) State - Shown is the state in which the facility is located.
(5) County - This is the county in which the facility is located.
(6) Region - Coded here is the number of the EPA Region in which
the facility is located.
(7) A/F Number - The Authority/Facility Number is a nine-digit
number indicating the state, in the first two digits, authority,
in the next four digits, and the facility within that authority
in the last three digits. This number uniquely identifies the
particular facility and can be used to identify the facility's
discharge permit number,if any, and grant number through the
EPA's cross reference index.
(8) Type Facility - This block refers to the type of construction
provided for in the grant number specified. Treatment facili-
ties only, collection facilities only, or a combination of both
may be coded, as indicated on the code reference table included
as Table A.I.
-------
A-3
(9) Change - Table A.I lists the possible change codes each specify-
ing the nature of the sewer system construction.
(10) Topography - This field employs the codes listed in Table
A.I and classifies the type of terrain on which construction
was performed.
(11) Soil Type - As listed in Table A.I, this field employs a two
digit code. The first digit categorizes the groundwater level
with respect to foundation construction. The second digit
specifies the soil type at the construction site.
(12) Use - This field utilizes a two-digit code to specify both the
land use designation applicable to the construction site and the
surface geography of the site.
(13) Extra Conditions - Extraordinary site conditions which signifi-
cantly affected construction are coded numerically in this field
and explained under the same code in the "comments" section of
the worksheet.
(14) Population - Based on the breakdown listed in Table A.I, the
population of the community served by the conveyance facility is
coded in this block. This population is not necessarily the
service population of the constructed system.
(15) Distance - Coded in this field is the distance, in tens of
miles, from the area served by the new system to the closest
city of 50,000 population or more.
(15a) Zip Code - This field provides the zip code of the city or town
specified in Block 3.
-------
A-4
(16) Total Project Cost - Input here is the total eligible project
cost as determined from the EPA Step III grant file for the
facility. The EPA share will generally be 75 percent of this
number. If code 03 is used in Block 8, the cost in Block 16
will include the cost for the associated wastewater treatment
plant.
(17) Date - This is the contract date as specified in the Step
III, construction contract documents for the project cost shown
in Block 16.
(18) Step I Cost - Input in this field is the total grant eligible
cost for the Step I planning phase. If the project iacluded
a treatment plant in addition to sewer facilities, the Step I
cost indicated will include facilities planning costs for
both.
(19) Date - This field provides the grant award date for the Step I
planning cost.
(20) Step II Cost - Input here is the total grant eligible cost for
the Step II design phase. Again, if the project included
treatment facilities in addition to sewer works, the cost
for design of both would be included in Block 20.
(21) Date - This block indicates the grant award date for the Step
II phase.
-------
A-5
(22) Construction Cost - This field specifies the actual construction
cost obtained from the project contract documents. This cost
includes total, eligible capital construction expenses and does
not include Step I or Step II costs or Step III non-construction
costs. For projects covering both collection and treatment
facilities, only the construction bid cost for the conveyance
system is indicated in Block 28.
(23 Non-Construction Cost - These eight blocks are allocated for
a-h) Step III non-construction cost items as enumerated in Table A.I,
Items 24a-h. Blocks 24a-h correspond to the same lettered
cost, i.e. Block 24c is the appropriate code for the cost
tabulated in Block 23c. The non-construction item costs were
obtained directly from the EPA grant files.
(23i) Architect/Engineer - The name of the engineering firm respons-
ible for the design and construction inspection of the convey-
ance facility was coded in this space.
(23j) Contractor - The name of the construction company to which the
conveyance system contract was awarded was coded in this space.
(24 Non-construction Cost Code - These blocks correspond to the
a-h) non-construction item blocks (Block 23) with the same letter
code. The codes utilized for specifying non-construction item
costs are listed in Table A.I.
(25) Cost Category - Each of the three digits in this block define
an element of individual construction items.
-------
A-6
1st Digit - As Listed on Table A.I this defines the category of
the cost item.
2nd Digit - This specifies whether the cost is for materials
only, labor only or in-place cost including labor
and materials.
3rd Digit - When other than a "zero" this digit indicates that
the given cost is for a specific sewer appurtenance
as indicated on Table A.I.
This list of appurtenances was developed after extensive pre-survey
analysis of sewer bid data. The items listed are those most commonly
defined in bid tabulations nationwide.
Examples of the use of Item 25 would be:
Code 130 for sanitary sewer, in-place;
Code 132 for sanitary sewer, in-place pipe bedding material;
Code 410 for manhole materials only; and
Code 236 for pavement removal and replacement for force main
sewers.
(26) Diameter - Input in this block is the inside diameter in inches
for gravity sewer pipe, force main, and manhole cost items.
This space is left blank for pumping station cost items.
(27) Length/Capacity - The block contains one of the following
descriptive items.
a. For gravity or force main sewer items the length associated
with the cost in Block 29 for the specific bid item is shown
in this field.
-------
A-7
b. For pump station cost items the design capacity of each
station is listed in this block.
c. For manhole cost items the number of manholes to which
the total cost in Block 29 applies is listed in this space.
(28) Unit Cost - For gravity sewer, force main and manhole cost
items, the cost per unit is given in this block. For gravity
sewer and force main items this would indicate dollars per foot
of length. For manholes the cost per unit is entered here.
Cost for manhole extension rings are coded separately as manhole
appurtenance costs. For pumping stations this block is left
blank.
(29) Total Cost - Indicated here are the extended costs for gravity
sewer, force main and manhole cost items e.g. Block 27 x Block
28. Since pumping stations are itemized separately, the cost
for each station is tabulated in this field.
(30) Depth/TDH - The depth, when specified in bid tabulations, for
gravity sewer cost items is entered in this block. When avail-
able, the total dynamic pumping head (TDK) for pumping station
items is entered here.
(31) Pipe/Type - As indicated on Table A.I the type of pipe on which
the cost of Block 28 is based is entered in this column with the
following codes:
01-PVC (Polyvinylchloride pipe)
02-AC (Asbestos cement pipe)
-------
A-8
03-VC (Vitriied clay pipe)
04-CI (Cast iron pipe)
05-RCP (Reinforced concrete pipe)
06-DIP (Ductile iron pipe)
07-Other
For pumping station items the type of station planned (i.e.
either custom or package) is identified according to Table A.I
codes.
(32) Special Condition - When extraordinary conditions existed which
affected the costs presented in Blocks 28 and 29, a numeric code
was employed in this field. The specific conditions where then
enumerated in the "Comments" section of the form under the same
code number.
-------
DATA COLLECTOR
DATE OF COLLECTION.
DATA LOCATION
SANITARY SEWERS
FORCE MAINS
PUMP STATIONS
FIGURE A.I
G
E
N EP
S -4
A — '— '—
L
1 3
1ST
0 . p
R L p
D
E
R — ,.
(25)
COST
CAT
2ND
&
3RD
0
D
R
(1) GRANT NO. (2) FACILITY NAME (3) CITY OR TOWN (4) STATE (5) COUNTY
(6) 7
A REGION A/F NUMBER
(16)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
"III
(22)
CONSTRUCTION COST
| |
(23f)
NON-CONS. ITEM
| |
(27
(26) LENGTH/
DIA. CAPACITY
IS) (9)
TYPE FAC. CHANGE
117)
DATE
II
(233)
NON-CONS. ITEM
" "I
(10)
TOPO
11)
SOIL
118)
STEP 1 COST
1
(24a
CODE
(24f) i23g)
CODE NON-CONS
"III
(28)
UNIT COST
ITEM
I
1
12)
USE
.^
(13)
X-COND.
14)
POP.
(19)
DATE
T
1
(23b
NON-CONS. ITEM
24g)
CODE
I
I24bl
CODE
(23h)
NON-CONS. TEM
(29)
TOTAL COST
I
1
(30)
DEPT/
TDH
(31)
PIPE/
TYPE
15)
DiST.
7 P
(20)
STEP 2 COST
I
1
(23c)
NON-CONS. ITEM
(24h)
CODE
(32)
SPEC.
COND.
JL
|
s
„
(21)
DATE
|
1
(24c)
CODE
(23il (23j)
A/E CONT.
(25)
COST
CAT.
(26!
DiA.
|
(23(1
NON-CONS
J_
ITEM
1
(27
LENGTH/
CAPACITY
(24d
CODE
(28)
UN IT COST
(23e
NON-CONS. ITEM
1
1
(29)
TOTAL COST
130)
DEPT/
TOH
«
(24el
CODE
| ,.
.1
(31) (32)
PIPE/ SPEC.
TYPE COND.
COMMENT SECTION
C ~
o
M
t I
' I
-------
A-10
TABLE A.I
CODE REFERENCE TABLE
SEWERS, FORCE MAINS, AND POMP STATIONS
ITEM 8 - NATURE OF PROJECT
01 - Treatment Plant
02 - Collection System
03 - Both 01 and 02
ITEM 12 - LAND USE
J10 - Agricultural
i20 - Residential
130 - Dense Residential
1st ,40 - Commercial
Digit 'SO - Dense Commercial
|GO - Industrial
J70 - Dense Industrial
:80 - Municipal
il)l - Open/Vacant
2nd |02 - Forested/Brushy
Digit ,03 - Structures
< 04 - Existing Thoroughfare
ITEM 25 - CONSTRUCTION COST
•Too - Sanitary Sewers (L.F.)
1st J200 - Force Main (L.F.)
Digit J300 - Pumping Stations (L.S.
i 400 - Manholes (Each)
j 500 - Drop Manholes
foiO - Materials
2nd -020 - Labor
Digit j 030 - In Place
rooi - Mobilization
i 002 - Appurtenances
1 003 - Thoroughfare Crossing
j 004 - Stream Crossing (L.F.)
3rd j 005 - Rock Excavation (Yd3)
Digit ! OGG - Pavement Removing and
ITEM 9 - NATURE OF CHANGE
01 - Enlarge
02 - Upgrade
03 - Enlarge and Upgrade
04 - New Construction
05 - Replace
06 - Abandon
07 - No Change
08 - Modification
09 - Other
ITEM 14 - POPULATION
01 - Less than 2,500
02 - 2,500-5,000
03 - 5,000-10,000
04 - 10,000-25,000
05 - 25,000-50,000
06 - 50,000-100,000
07 - 100,000-250,000
08 - 250,000-500,000
09 - 500,000-1,000,000
10 - Greater than 1,000,000
CATEGORY ITEM
Type
) 01 -
02 -
03 -
04 -
05 -
06 -
07 -
(L.F.)
Replacement L.F.)
ITEM 10 - TOPOGRAPHY ITEM 11 - SOIL TYPE
01 - Flat 00 - No Ground Water Problem
02 - Rolling 01 - Soft Fines
03 - Hilly 1st 02 - Medium Fines
04 - Steep Digit 03 - Stiff Fines
04 - Coarse
05 - Rock
J10 - E;;cavate into
2nd Ground Water
Digit 20 - Surface Saturated
[30 - Ground Water Unknown
ITEM 24 a-h - NONCONSTRUCTION ITEMS
01 - Administrative/Legal
02 - Preliminary
03 - Land, Structures, Right-of-way
04 - Architect/Engineer Basic Fees
05 - Other Architect/Engineer Fees
06 - Project Inspection Fees
07 - Land Development
08 - Relocation Expenses
09 - Relocation Payments to Individuals
and Businesses
10 Demolition and Removal
11 - Bond Interest
12 - Contingency
13 - Indirect Costs
14 — Miscellaneous
15 - Other Significant Ineligible Costs
16 - Equipment
17 - Other Eligible Costs (Comment)
31 - TYPE OF PIPE & PUMP STATIONS
of Pipe PulRp Stations
Polyvinylchloride 10 - Custom
Asbestos Cement 20 - Package
Vitrified Clay 30 - Other
Cast Iron
Reinforced Concrete
Ductile Iron
Other
] 007 - Utility Reconnection and Removal (L.F.)
i 008 - Bedding (Yd3)
i 009 - Miscellaneous
-------
APPENDIX B
DESCRIPTION OF DATA BASE
-------
B-l
APPENDIX B
DESCRIPTION OF DATA BASE
Data for this study were collected from 455 Federally funded
facilities spread over the ten EPA regions. Name, grant number, and
other information for each sample facility are listed in Table B.I. The
index city refers to the Complete Urban Sanitary Sewer (CUSS) reference
city to which each facility was related for cost indexing purposes. See
Appendix C for a complete discussion of cost indexing procedures. Map
B.I shows the locations of sampled projects on the national map.
Table B.2 is a breakdown of the data base by pipe type, pipe depth,
and diameter by state and by EPA region.
-------
LISTING W SIWERS SAMPLE
IN REGION AND GRANT NUMBER ORDER
NJ
GRANT NO.
090155
0^0191
230102
230114
230117
230122
250255
250266
250270
250300
330093
330104
330119
330137
440074
440086
500079
500081
500083
500089
340334
340344
340354
340356
340358
34O377
FACILITY NAME
STONINGTON COLLECTION
PLYMOUTH SEWERS
FORT FAIRFIELD INTERCETOR
OLD ORCHARD BEACh INT
SOUTH PORTLAND INTERCEPTO
PORTLAND WD INTERCEPTORS
ROCKPORT INTERCEPTOR
BRADFORD INTERCEPTOR
ORANGE INTERCEPTOR
HULL WWTP £ SEWERS
MANCHESTER INTERCEPTOR
ALLENSTOWN SEWERS
WARNER VILL.F.D. SEWERS
LISBON SEWER SYSTEM
BLOCK ISLAND SEWER SYSTEM
SMITHFIELD COLLECTION
BRANDON INTERCEPTOR
HARTFORD INTERCEPTOR
NORTH BRANCH I.D. SEWERS
ENOSBURG FALLS COLLECTION
EDISON TOWNSHIP INT SEWER
ATLANTIC COUNTY S.A.
PEQUANNOCK, LINCOLN PARKE
OCEAN CO.SEWERAGE AUTHINI
PFMBERTON M IN A
S MON^OUTH R.S.A.
HOPEW6LL SANITARY SEWERS
CITY
STATE
COUNTY
INDEX CITY
STONINGTON
PLYMOUTH
FORT FAIRFIELD
OLD ORCHARD BCH
SOUTH PORTLAND
PORTLAND
ROCKPORT
HAVERHILL
ORANGE
HULL
MANCHESTER
ALLENSTOWN
WARNER
LISBON
NEW SHOREHAH
SMITHFIELO
BRANDON
HARTFORD
WEST DOVER
ENOSBURG FALLS
EDISON
ATLANTIC CITY
FAIRFIELO
TOMS RIVER
NEW LISBON
SPRING LAKE
CONNECT ICUTT
CONNECT ICUTT
MAINE
MAINE
MAINE
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
MASSACHUSETTS
MASSACHUSETTS
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
RHODE ISLAND
RHODE ISLAND
VERMONT
VERMONT
VERMONT
VERMONT
NEW JERSEY
NEW JERSEY
NEW JERSEY
NEW JERSEY
NEW JERSEY
NEW JERSEY
NFW LONDON
L ITCHFI ELD
A RODS TOOK
YORK
CUMBERLAND
CUMBERLAND
ESSEX
ESSEX
FRANKLIN
PLYMOUTH
HILLSBOROUGH
MERRIMACK
MERRIMACK
GRAFTON
WASHINGTON
PROVIDENCE
RUTLAND
W INOSOR
WINDHAM
FRANKLIN
MIDDLESEX
ATLANTIC
ESSEX
OCEAN
BURL ING TON
MONMOUIH
104
10't
10'*
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
125
120
125
125
125
125
HOPEWELL
NEW JERSEY
MERCER
-------
w
340444 PENNtNGTON SEfctRS
340455 FIELDSBORO SEWERS
340471 MOUNTAIN LAKES
340479 POINT PLEASANT
140499 LONG BEACH COLLECTOR SEW
340507 MANTOLOKING SEWERS
340534 RANDOLPH TUP M.U.A.
360389 RENSSELAER COUNTY S.D.
360391 TONAWANOA
360433 SAG HARBOR SEWERAGE SYST.
360485 ONTARIO TOWN SEWERAGE SYS
360495 N TONAWANOA WTW
360525 WATERVLIET
360534 SACKETS HARBOR STP
360611 ELLICOTTVILLE INT
360618 AMHERST SEW SYS
360638 GUILOERLAND-NORMANS KILL
360640 WALTON SEWERS
360644 WATERFORD SEWERAGE SYSTEM
360646 COflLESKILL
3606BO CHAUTAUQUA LAKE SU
360691 ORANGE CO, S. 0. *1
360707 NIAGARA CO S.0.31
360720 SCOTIA SEWER IMP
360747 NIAGARA FALLS AWT
360771 WESfFIFLD SEWER IMPRUVEM
360812 SODUS POINT STP
360824 ALBION AWT
360854 DEPOSIT SEWERAGE SYSTEM
360859 MARATHON SEWER SYSTEM
TABLE B.I (Continued)
PENNINGTON
FIELDS30RO
MOUNTAIN LAKES
POINT PLEASANT
BEACH HAVEN
MANTOLOKING
RANDOLPH
TROY
TONAWANDA
SAG HARBOR
ONTARIO
N TONAWANOA
WATERVLIET
SACKETS HARBOR
ELLICOTTVILLE
WILLIAMSVILLE
GUILDERLAND
WALTON
WATERFORO
COBLESKILL
MAYVILLE
GOSHEN
NI TQNAWANOA
SCOT IA
NIAGARA FALLS
WESTFIELD
SODUS POINT
ALBION
DEPOSIT
MARATHON
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
NEW
JERSEY
JERSEY
JERSEY
JERSEY
JERSEY
JERSEY
JERSEY
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
YORK
MERCER
BURLINGTON
MORRIS
OCEAN
OCEAN
OCEAN
MORRIS
RENSSELAER
ERIf
SUFFOLK
WAYNE
NIAGARA
ALBANY
JEFFERSON
CATTARAUGUS
ERIE
ALBANY
DELAWARE
SARATOGA
SCHOHARIE
CHAUTAUQUA
ORANGE
NIAGARA
SCHENFCTADY
N IAGARA
CHAUTAUOUA
W AYNF
ORLEANS
BROOME
CORTLAND
IZ5
125
125
125
125
125
125
104
121
119
121
121
104
121
121
121
104
104
104
104
121
104
121
104
121
121
121
12 1
121
121
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
Cd
720093 PUNCF LATERALS
78000? CHR ISTIANSTED SEWERAGE SY
100055 DtWEY BEACH COLLECTION
100076 FREDERICA WW COLLECTION
100088 SO COASTAL REGIONAL SYSTE
100102 TIOHURY BRANCH COLLECT ION
100103 CAMDEN-WYOMING-1SAAC BRAN
240152 CALVERT CO SANITARY DIST
240180 FRIEMDSVILLE SEWERS
240224 FREEDOM 01ST
240243 ACCIDENT TOWN UF
240255 WILLAROS SEWERS
240284 WHARF AREA INTERCEPTORS
240289 LAVALE SEWERS
240294 8ALLENGER CREEK WTW
240311 FREEDOM DISTRICT INTERCEP
240312 INTERCEPTORS
240318 CLEAR SPRING SEWERS
240319 WILLIAMSPOPT INTERCEPTOR
240339 BKOADiVATER CELLO PHASE II
240348 MARGATE COLLECTION SYSTEM
240374 ACCOKEFK AREA INTERCEPTOR
240393 SMITH ISLAND COLLECTION
240453 BUSH CREEK FCPCC MAIN
340333 PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS INT
420600 VALLEY FORGE SEWER AUTH.
420621 MALVERN MUNICIPAL AUTH
420622 PORTAGE JOINT SEWER AUTH
«.2065T TRl-BORO MUNICIPAL AUTH
42O7O1 MUSHAMNON VALLEY J-S.A.
SANTURCE
ST. CROIX
DEWEY BEACH
FREOERICA
BETHANY BEACH
DOVER
DOVER
PRINCE FREDERIC
FRIENOSVILLE
WESTMINSTER
ACCIDENT
WILLARDS
CENTREVILLE
LAVALE
FREDERICK
SYKESVILLE
BALTIMORE
CLEAR SPRING
WILL IAMSPQRT
BROADWATER
MARGATE
ACCOKEEK
SMITH ISLAND
LONG BAR HARBOR
PARSIPPANY
PHOENIXVILLE
MALVERN
PORTAGE
SUSQUEHANNA
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISLAND
DELAWARE
DELAWARE
DELAWARE
DELAWARE
DELAWARE
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
MARYLAND
NEW JERSEY
PENNSYLVANIA
PA
PENNSYLVAN IA
PENN
SUSSEX
KENT
SUSSEX
KENT
KENT
CALVERT
GARRF.TT
CARROLL
GARRETT
M ICCIMICO
QUEEN ANNE 'S
ALLfcGANY
FREDERICK
CAKRULL
BALTIMORE
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
ANNE ARUNDEL
ANNE AVONDEL
PRINCE GEORGES
SOMERSET
HARFORD
MORRIS
CHESTER
CHESTER
CAMBRIA
SUSQUEHANNA
129
130
120
120
120
120
120
102
121
102
121
102
102
121
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
125
120
120
121
12O
PHIL IPSBURG
PENNSYLVAN I A
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
W
Ui
420707 NtC CANOLFSS TWP SAN.AUTH
420711 HAMIL TMNBAN TWP AUl'H
420712 QLEY TWP MUNICIPAL AUTH.
420723 ADAMS TOWNSHIP
420724 STONYCREEKIUPPER) J.M.A.
420733 THOMPSONTOWN MUNIC.AUTH.
420739 POINT MARION MUNIC AUTH
420742 TREMONT MUNICIPAL AUTH
420744 HILLCREEK TWP SEWER AUTH.
420760 SYKESVILLE MUNICIPAL AUTH
420761 ADAMS TOWNSHIP
420769 FRANKLIN
420774 WINDSOR TWP MUNIC.AUTH.
420775 CARMir.HAELS-CUMBERLAND JT
420781 SCHAYLKILL HAVEN MUNIC.A.
420783 BROWN TWP MUNICIPAL AUTH
420799 MONONGAHELA MUNICIPAL AUT
420SOO SO.PARK TWP SEWER AUTH.
420820 MHUNTAINTHP AREA
420837 PENN TWP SEWERAGE AUTH
420883 NESHANNOCK TV.P
420906 UNION SEWER S DISPOSAL AU
420917 PORTER-TOWER JOINT M.A.
420992 FAIRVIEW TWP AUTH.
420993 PENN HILLS
421004 HARRISBURG SEWERAGE AUTH
510259 FIELDALE REGIONAL COLL.
510319 MILL CREEK INTERCEPTOR
510331 UPPER OCCOOUAN SAN. D1ST.
510343 VIRGINIA BEACH SEkERS
PITTSBURGH
GE TTYSBURG
01. EY
DUALO
HOOVERSV.ILLE
THOMPSONTOWN B.
POINT MARION
TRfcMONT
ERIE
SYKE'SVILLE
DUALO
FRANKLIN
RED LION
CARMICHAELS
SCHUYLKILL HAVE
REEDSVILLE
MONQNGAHCLA
LIBRARY
MOUNTAINTOP
HARRISON CITY
NEW CASTLE
NEW CASTLE
TOWER CITY
NEW CUMBERLAND
PENN HILLS
HARRISBURG
FIELDALE
LEXINGTON
MANASSAS
VIRGINIA BEACH
PENNSYLVAN I A
PENNSYLVANIA
PENN.
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVAN IA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENN
PENN
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA
PENN
PENN
PENNSYLVAN I A
PENN
PENN
PENN
VIPGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
ALLEGHENY
ADAMS
BERKS
CAMBRIA
SOMERSET
J UN I ATA
FAYETTE
SCHUYLKILL
ERIE
JEFFERSON
CAMBRIA
VENANGO
YORK
GREENE
SCHUYLKILL
MIFF LIN
WASHINGTON
ALLEGHENY
LUZ.ERNE
WESTMORELAND
LAWRENCE
LAWRENCE
SCHUYLKILL
YORK
A LLEGHENY
DAUPHIN
HENRY
ROCKflRIOGE
PRINCE WILLIAM
PRINCESS ANNE
121
102
120
121
121
121
121
120
121
121
121
121
102
121
120
121
121
121
120
121
121
i-n
120
102
121
120
102
102
102
102
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
510375
510383
510384
510446
510446
510447
510490
510498
510500
510515
510528
540208
540213
540281
54028B
540335
5^039-5
540427
010250
010256
010296
12042R
120653
130315
130357
280316
280380
37O364
37O383
CLIFTON FORGE CULL
STUART StWfRS
ROUND HILL
WAVERLY SEWERS
KIVAK'NA WATER £ SEWFR AUT
RIVANNA WATER 6 SEWER AUT
PLAINS-MARSHALL REGIONAL
MCKF.NNEY SEWERS
3LACKSBURG-VPI SAN.AUTH.
RF50V1LLE SO SEWERS
POUND COLLECTION SYSTEM
JAMES CITY CO SO #3 SEWER
OELBARTON
BLUEFIF.LD
E. KANAWHA P. S. DIST
NITRO COLLECTIUN SYSTEM
STONEWOOD COLLECTIUN
COAL HOLLOW
RIVERBENO P. S. DIST
MONROEVILLE
NEW HOPE
TOWN CREEK SEfcER SYSTtM
PENSACOLA WT h
FORCE MAIN K PUMP STATION
RICHMOND HILL SEWERAGE SY
ALMA
RICHLAND W G S DISTRICT
TOWN CREEK SEViER
TARI3OKO WTM
FARMVILI.E V«T W
CLIFTON FORGE
STUART
ROUND HILL
WAVERLY
CHARLOTTESVILLE
CHARLOTTESVILLE
MARSHALL
MCKENNEY
BLACKSBURG
REEDV1LLE
POUND
WILL IAMSBURG
OELBARTON
BLUEFIELD
HOMETOWN
NITRO
STCNEWOOD
CHARLESTON
ST.ALBANS
MONRCEVILLE
NEW HOPE
TOWN CREEK
PENSACOLA
DELRAY BEACH
RICHMOND HILL
ALMA
JACKSON
JACKSON
TAR3QRO
FARMVILL6
VIRGINIA
V 1RGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WtST VIRGINIA
ALAPAMA
ALABAMA
ALABAMA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
GEORGIA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSISSIPP I
N. CAROLINA
N. CAROL IMA
ALLF.GHANY
PATRICK
LOUD DUN
SUSSEX
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
F AUOUIER
DINWIDDIE
MONTGOMERY
NORTHUMBERLAND
W 1SE
JAMES CITY
MINGO
MERCER
PUTNAM
KANAUHA/PUTNAM
HARR I SON
KANAWHA
KANAWHA
MONROE
MADISON
LAWRENCE
ESCAMBIA
PALM BEACH
BRYAN
BACON
R ANKIN
H INDS
EOGFCOMBE
EDGE COM tie
in?
10?
10?
102
102
102
102
102
102
10?
102
102
l?l
121
121
121
121
121
121
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
118
1 18
105
IOS
-------
TABLE B.I '(Continued)
to
I
370434 SPRING LAKC
370441 MDORF COUNTY REGIONAL WT W
450265 SANTFE PUBLIC SERVICE D1S
450294 GRF. FNVILLE COUNTY SA.
450321 AIKEN CO HD CF COMMISSION
450379 ANDERSON CO WES COMM
470355 MCEWEN COLLECTION SYSTEM
470457 CENTFRV1LLE SEWERS
470463 BLOUNT COUNTY SEWERS
IT0508 3USHNELL SEWERS
170680 SPARTA
170924 SALEM
170970 U'FALLON
171006 HIGHLAND PK.GViEST INT.
171023 BELLEVILLE INTERCEPTORS
171089 GIBSON CITY INTERCEPTOR
171196 OUQUOIN
171202 MATOON
171294 WOODRIDGF INTERCEPTORS
171294 EAST BRANCH INTERCEPTOR
171310 MT. VERNON INTERCEPTORS
171365 ARTHUR
171397 HINSDALE SD SEWERS
171412 CARPENTERSVI LLE INTRCI'TR
171420 BLOOM TOWNSHIP SEWERS
171686 NAPERVILLE INTERCEPTOR
171714 OEERF1ELO INTERCEPTORS
171795 EAST SIDE LOW LEVEL INT
171796 RUCKI'URO SANITARY OISTRIC
111797 KOCKfORD SANITARY DISIRIC
SPRING LAKE
CARTHAGE
SANTEE
GREENVILLE
AIKEN
ANDERSON
MCEWEN
CENTERVILLE
MARYVILLE
BUSHNELL
SPARTA
SALEM
O'FALLON
8LCOMINGTON
BELLEVILLE
GIBSON CITY
DUQUOIN
MATCCN
WHEATON
WOOORIDGE
MT. VERNON
ARTHUR
HINSDALE
CARPENTERSVILI. E
CHICAGO HEIGHTS
NAPERVILLE
OEERFIEIO
KOCKFORD
TROCKFORD
TROCKFORO
NORTH CAROLINA
N. CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
TENNESSEE
ILL INOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILL INOIS
ILLINOIS
I L L 1 NO I S
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILL INOIS
ILLINOIS
ILL INOIS
ILL INOIS
I L L I NO I S
ILL I NO I S
ILLINOIS
ILL INOIS
ILL INOIS
CUMBERLAND
MOORE
ORANGEBURG
GREENVI LLE
AIKEN
ANDERSON
HUMPHREYS
H ICKMAN
BLOUNT
MCDONOUGH
RANDOLPH
MARION
ST. CLAIR
MCLEAN
ST CLAIR
FORO
PERRY
COLES
DUPAGE
DU PAGF
JEFFERSON
DOUGLAS
DUPAGE
KANE
COOK/WILL
OUPAGE
I AKE
WINNEBAGO
WINNTBAUO
V. INNFBAGO
105
105
105
105
105
105
103
103
103
116
122
122
122
116
122
116
122
122
106
106
122
122
106
106
106
106
106
I 16
116
1 16
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
co
171799 RGCKFORO SANITARY DISTRIC
175023 POPLAR CREEK INTERCEPTOR
17502'. MSD LIF CHICAGO
175030 MSO OF CHICAGO
17505** INTERCEPTOR
175073 MSD OF CHICAGO
175102 CALOMET INTERCEPTOR
175130 MSD OF CHICAGO
175150 SALT CREEK INTERCEPTOR
175321 MSD OF GREATER CHICAGO
175322 UPPER DES PLAINES INTCPTR
175363 MSD OF CHICAGO
130240 SWEETSER SEWERS
180260 NORTH WEBSTER
180291 INDEPENDENCE HILL CD COLL
180328 SHELBURN
180329 LINDEN COLLECTION SYSTEM
180335 ELNORA SEWERS
180346 fHRDSEYE INTERCEPTOR
180354 WILLIAMSPORT SEWERS
130375 ROME CITY
180400 BROOKLYN
180405 WHITING SEWERS
180425 KNIGHTSVILLE-HARMONY COLL
180434 CLARKS HILL COLL SYSTEM
180445 CARMEL INTERCEPTOR
180467 SEYMOUR FORCE MAIN
180470 PARAGON SEWERS
180^73 LAUREL
180*79 SEELYVILL6 COLLECTION
TROCKFORD
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
SWEETSER
NORTH WEBSTER
CROWN POINT
SHELBURN
LINDEN
ELNORA
8IRDSEYE
HILLIAMSPORT
ROME CITY
BROOKLYN
WHITING
KNIGHTSVILLE
CLARKS HILL
CARMEL
SEYMOUR
PARAGON
LAUREL
ILLINOIS
ILL I NO IS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILL INOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
ILL INOIS
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
W1NNEBAGO
COOK
COOK
COOK
COOK
COOK
COOK
COOK
COOK
COOK
C OOK
COOK
GRANT
KOSCLUSKO
LAKE
SULLIVAN
MONTGOMERY
DAVIESS
DUBOIS
WARREN
NOBLE
MORGAN
LAKE
CLAY
T IPPECANOE
HAMILTON
JACKSON
MORGAN
FRANKLIN
1 16
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
107
107
106
122
122
122
122
122
107
122
106
122
122
122
107
122
107
S6ELYVILLE
INOIANA
-------
TABLE B,l (Continued)
w
180495
180502
180520
180526
180528
180533
180542
180547
180555
180574
180591
180638
180767
180866
180874
180877
262034
262053
262088
262110
262148
262314
262345
262397
262449
262462
262462
262491
CLAY CITY
COVINGION INTERCEPTOR
DUGGER
StJNMAN
MEW PROVIDENCE COLL SYS
STAUNTON COLL SYS
MARTINSVILLE INTERCEPTORS
PRINCETON SEWERS
HUNTINGTON
NORTH AREA INTERCEPTORS
P1HNNVILLE SEVERS
BOSWELL
COMVERSE
BICKNELL SEWERS
BLUFFTON SEWERS
GREENWOOD
RICHMOND AREA REGIONAL SO
INDIANAPOLIS, ETAL.
HARBOR SPRINGS AREA SEWER
CHATHAM INTERCEPTOR
MOUNT CLEMENS
CADILLAC
GRATIQT CO. -FULTON DPW
CHEBOYGAN AREA WW MANAG.
BAY CITY RELIEF SEWERS
MONROE CO. DRAIN COMM
LENAWEE CO. DRAIN COMM.
PT. HURON TWP.
PORT HURON
MT CLEMENS C CLINTON AREA
CLAY CITY
COV INGTON
DtJGGER
SIJNMAN
NEW PROVIDENCE
STAUNTOW
MART INSVILLE
PRINCETON
HUNT INGTON
MUNC'lE
PENNVILLE
80SWELL
CONVERSE
8ICKNELL
DLUFFTON
GREENWOOD
RICHMOND
INDIANAPOLIS
HARBOR SPRINGS
CHATHAM
MOUNT CLEMENS
CADILLAC
ITHACA
CHEBOYGAN
BAY CITY
MONROE
ADRIAN
PORT HURON
PORT HURON
MT CLEMENS
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
CLAY
FOUNTAIN
SULLIVAN
RIPLEY
CLARK
CLAY
MORGAN
GIBSON
HUNT INGTON
DELAWARE
JAY
BENTON
MIAMI
KNOX
WELLS
JOHNSON
WAYNE
MARION
EMMET
ALGER
MACQMB
HEXFORD
GRAT IOT
CHEBOYGAN
PAY
MONROE
LENAWEE
ST. CLAIR
ST. CLAIR
MACOMB
12?
122
l?2
107
107
122
122
122
107
107
107
107
107
122
107
122
107
122
111
116
111
111
11 I
111
111
111
111
1 11
11 1
11 1
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
I
H
O
26Z501
262503
262504
262527
262535
262541
262543
262597
262613
262614
262639
262646
270043
270720
270720
270747
270748
270818
270824
270837
270838
270844
270845
270949
270970
390491
390542
390579
390586
1.1WOSSO
BIG RAPIDS INTERCEPTOR
MILES TOWNSHIP SEVERS
OWOSSO-CALEDCNIA SEWERS
MASON
IONIA SEWFRS
LUCE 0.0. DPW
GRATIOT CO.- ALMA , AkCADA. .
MONROE CO.
MONROE CO.FRENCHTOWNBEACH
ALLEGAN
ST. CLAIR CO.
DIJVER-EYOTA SEWERS
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
ST CLOUD
WESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR, ETC
STOCKTON COLLECTION SYS
ST.PFTER £ KASOTA.ETAL.
TAUNTON COLL SYSTEM
ZIMMERMAN INTERCEPTS
ALEXANDRIA LAKfc AREA SO
BREEZY POINT FORCE MAIN
MARSHALL FORCE MAIN
MADISON LAKE
WOOD COUNTY SS » 400
PORTAGE CO. RAVENNA S.D.
HAMILTON COUNTY INTERCPTR
MINERAL CITY
GEAUGA CO. tMCFARLAND CR K
UWOSSCI
BIG RAPIDS
ST JOSEPH
CORUNNA
MASON
IONIA
NEW8ERRY
ITHACA
MONROE
MONRCE
ALLEGAN
PORT HURON
ST CHARLES
VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA
ST CLOUD
DULUTH
STCCKTON
ST. PETER
TAUNTON
ZIMMERMAN
ALEXANDRIA
BREEZY POINT
MARSHALL
MADISON LAKE
BOWLING GREEN
RAVENNA
CINCINNATI
MINERAL CITY
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
SHI AWASEE
MECOSTA
BERR IEN
SH1AWASEE
I NGHAM
IONIA
LUCE
GRAT KIT
MONROE
MONROE
ALLEGAN
ST. CLAIR
W INONA
ST. LOUIS
ST. LOUIS
STEARNS
ST. LOUIS
W INONA
LE SUEUR
LYON
SHERBORNE
DOUGLAS
CROW WING
LYON
BLUE EARTH
WOOD
PORTAGE
HAMILTON
TUSC ARAWAS
111
11 1
111
111
111
111
116
11 I
111
111
111
111
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
111
108
107
121
CHAROQN
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
39O626 LIMA INTERCEPTORS
VJOf.30 TURUjM SCWERAGE SYSTEM
3906'«0 F AYE-WOODS INTERCEPTOR
3906V. CIRCLEVILLE INTERCEPTORS
390648 OREGON INTERCEPTORS
390657 MEDINA COUNTY INTERCEPTOR
390659 NORTHWEST AREA INTERCEPT.
390663 H4SKINS COLL SYSTEM
390680 MEW KNOXVILLE COLL SYSTEM
390683 FRENCH CREEK SEHERS
39068
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
391001
391005
391008
391104
550569
550573
550625
550631
550670
550787
550790
550820
550821
050346
050350
050358
050367
220292
220295
220305
220307
220309
220310
220314
220321
220340
350171
350188
351O29
PKEIM.P. COUNTY COI.L SYSTEM
ASHLEY
XENIA
LUCAS CTY-MCCORO RD INT
MT HOREB INTERCEPTOR
LOMIRA INTERCEPTOR
MONTREAL INTERCEPTOR
OCONOMOWOC INTERCEPTOR
INTERCEPTOR SEWER
MARSHFIELD SEWERS
STOUGHTON INTERCEPTOR
NORTHERN MORAINE UC SEWER
HEART OF THE VALLEY SEWER
PARAGOULO INTERCEPTOR
GREENBRIER SEWERAGE SYST
CENTERTON COLLECTION SYS
WEST SIDE WH TRT WORKS
JEANERETTE SEWERAGE SYST
BASILE WW COLLECTION SYST
RUSTON WW COLLECTION SYST
GILBERT SEWERAGE SYSTEM
VIVIAN SEWERAGE SYSTEM
PLEASANT HILL SEWERAGE
ROSEPINE SEWERAGE SYSTEM
LIVINGSTON SEWERAGE SYST
WEST OUCH1TA COLL SYSTEM
LAS CRUCES
LQROSBURG SEWERAGE SYSTEM
PCJRTALfcS SEWERAGE SYSTEM
J&NEA& COLLECTION SYSTEM
EATON
COLUMBUS
XENI A
MAUMEE
MT HOREB
LOMIRA
MONTREAL
OCONOMOWOC
MILWAUKEE
MARSHFIELD
STOUGHTON
ELKHART LAKE
KAUKAUNA
PARAGOULO
GREENBRIER
CENTERTON
JONESBORO
JEANERETTE
BASILE
RUSTON
GILBERT
VIVIAN
PLEASANT HILL
ROSEPINE
LIVINGSTON
WEST MONROE
LAS CRUCES
LORDSBURG
PORTALES
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
WISCONSIN
WISCONSIN
WISCONSIN
WI SCONSIN
WISCONSIN
WISCONSIN
WISCONSIN
WI SCONSIN
WISCONSIN
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOUISIANA
LOU1 SIANA
NEW MEXICO
NEW MEXICO
NtW PEXICO
P R f: D L E
DELAWARE
GREENE
LUCAS
DANE
DODGE
IRON
WAUKESHA
MILWAUKEE
WOOD
DANE
SHEBOYGAN
OUT A GAM IE
GREENE
FAULKNER
BENTON
CRAIGHEAD
IBERIA
EVANGELINE
LINCOLN
FRANKLIN
CADDQ
SABINE
VERNON
LIVINGSTON
OUCHITA
DONA ANA
HItOALGO
ROOSEVELT
L07
108
107
11 1
116
116
117
116
116
116
116
116
116
109
109
109
109
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
109
109
109
SAPULPA
OKLAHOMA
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
W
t—
u>
400537 WEWOKA SEWERS
400563 SEWCO INTERCEPTOR
400577 KETCHUM SEWERAGE SYSTEM
400638 AMBER COLLECTION SYSTEM
400644 COTTON CO RWD COLL SYSTEM
400648 ALTUS INTERCEPTOR
400674 STILLHATER INTERCEPTORS
400682 PERRY SEWERS
400743 MARTHA SEWERS
480799 BLOOMING GROVE SEWERS
480856 CROCKETT CITY INTERCEPTOR
480878 MERTZON SEWERAGE SYSTEM
480899 SAN JUAN SEWERS
480931 PALESTINE SEfcERAGE SYSTEM
480938 KERRVILLE SEWERAGE SYSTEM
480953 SULFUR SPRINGS SEWERAGE
480981 CROSBY COLLECTION SYSTEM
481078 LOMAX SEWERAGE SYSTEM
481110 8UENA VISTA INTERCEPTOR
481168 GILMER COLLECTION SYSTEM
190605 HARLAN INTERCEPTOR
190617 WOOLSTOCK SEVERS
190637 SPENCER INTERCEPTOR
Z004L5 JUNCTION CITY INTERCEPTOR
200429 ATLANTA COLLECTION SYSTEM
200450 SILVER LAKE SEWER
200576 LA HARPE WWTP £ SEWERS
290524 MONETT SEWER SYSTEM
290603 NEVADA WWTP £, INTERCEPTOR
290646 WYATT SEWER SYSTEM
WEWOKA
TULSA
KETCHUM
AMBER
HANDLE TT
ALTUS
STILLWATER
PERRY
MARTHA
BLOOMING GROVE
CROCKETT
MERTZON
CORPUS CHRISTI
PALESTINE
KERRVILLE
SULFUR SPRINGS
CROSBY
LOMAX
DEL RIO
GILMER
HARLAN
WOCLSTOCK
SPENCER
JUNCTION CITY
ATLANTA
SILVER LAKE
LA HARPE
MONETT
•NEVADA
WYATT
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
TEXAS
IOWA
IOWA
IOWA
KANSAS
KANSAS
KANSAS
KANSAS
MISSOURI
Ml SSOURI
MISSOURI
S EM INGLE:
TULSA
CRAIG
GRADY
COTTON
JACKSON
PAYNE
NOBLE
JACKSON
NAVARRO
HOUSTON
IRION
NUECES
ANDERSON
KERR
HOPKINS
HARRIS
HARRIS
VAL VERDE
UPSHUR
SHELBY
WEBSTER
CLAY
GEARY
COWLEY
SHAHNEE
ALLEN
BARRY
VERNON
M ISSISSIPPI
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
109
123
112
U2
112
112
112
109
112
112
112
109
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
122
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
CB
I
290674 VJARKENTON SEViERS
290689 ST. POBERT INTERCEPTOR
290696 CARUTHERSVILLE COLL. SYS.
310*07 BLAIR SEWFR SYSTEM
310421 SPRINGFIELD hWTP f. SEWERS
310433 YORK SEWER SYSTEM
310435 ARLINGTON SEWER SYSTEM
080321 FT. COLLINS INTERCEPTOR
080322 UPPER THOMPSON WWTP
080337 PARADISE HILLS INTERCEPT.
090352 LONGMONT WWTP £ SEWER SYS
080369 PLATTfc II INTERCEPTOR
0803TO PLATTE II INTERCEPTUR
300194 FLAXVILLE SEViERS
300199 MISSOULA STP £ INT
380294 ENOERLIN WTW £ SS
380313 SHELDON LAGOON AND CS
380332 CRARY SEWERS
460222 VIVIAN LAGOON £ COLL. SYS
460238 RAMONA SEWER SYSTEM
460240 RAPID VALLEY COLLECTION
460259 HENRY COLLECTION SYSTEM
460264 PRAIRIE MEADOW COLL. SYS
460472 BRUCE LAGOON & COLL. SYS.
490142 CEDAR CITY WWTP
490152 HYRUM CITY WWTP & SEWERS
490175 TROPIC TOWN OF
490131 EMERY TOWN PONOS 6 COLL.
490182 SEWER LINE EXTENSION
56OXO3 THERMOPOLIS INTERCEPTOR
WARRENTUN
ST. ROBERT
CARUTHERSV ILLE
BLAIR
SPRINGFIELD
YORK
ARLINGTON
FT. COLLINS
ESTES PARK
GRAND JUNCTION
LONGMONT
DENVER
DENVER
FLAXVILLE
MISSQULA
ENOERLIN
SHELDON
CRARY
VIVIAN
RAMONA
RAPID CITY
HENRY
SIOUX FALLS
BRUCE
CEDAR CITY
HYRUM CITY
TROPIC
EMERY TOWN
PRICE
MISSOUR 1
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
NEBRASKA
NEBRASKA
NEBRASKA
NEBRASKA
COLORADO
COLORADO
COLORADO
COLORADO
COLORADO
COLORADO
MONTANA
MONTANA
NORTH DAKOTA
NORTH DAKOTA
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
UTAH
UTAH
UTAH
UTAH
UTAH
WARREN
PULASK I
PEMISCOTT
WASHINGTON
SARPY
YORK
WASHINGTON
LARIMER
I ARI MER
MESA
BOULDER
DENVER
DEMVER
DANIELS
MISSOULA
RANSOM
RANSOM
RAMSEY
LYMAN
LAKE
PENNINGTON
CODINGTON
MINNEHAHA
BROOK INGS
IRON
CACHE
GARFIELD
EMERY
C ARBOM
12?
122
122
113
113
113
113
110
110
110
110
110
110
124
124
117
H 7
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
110
HO
110
110
110
TMERMOPULIS
WYOMING
HOT SPRINGS
110
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
560104
5601 10
040147
040160
040162
060740
060763
060772
060778
060786
060810
060813
060816
W
1 060823
060840
060859
060915
060938
060940
060950
060956
060957
060961
060967
061062
061121
061138
061151
150050
150054
COWLEY STP G COLLECTOR
LABARGE WWTP C COLL. SYS.
RILLITO INTERCEPTOR
SOUTHWEST INTERCEPTOR
UNOOW ROCK-FT. DEFIANCE
NORTH POINT CROSSTOWN INT
KERMAN INTERCEPTORS
FORCE MAIN
ALTAVILLE INTERCEPTOR
80LINAS COLLECTION
SUISUN-COROEL IA SYSTEM
INYO CO. SEWERS
REGIONAL COLLECTION
MT. SHASTA INTERCEPTOR
NORTH INTERCEPTOR
MONTCLAIR INTERCEPTOR
NAPA INTERCEPTOR
INTERCEPTOR
GRAND TERRACE COLLECTION
FSTECO INTERCEPTOR
SHASTA 0AM AREA COLLECTIO
SANTA ANA INTERCEPTOR
NORTH-SOUTH INTERCEPTOR
EAST SQNORA IN1ERCEPTOR
MCKINLEYVILLE COLLECTION
TAHOE-TRUCKEE INTERCEPTOR
LOS COYOTES INTERCEPTOR
HERNDON INTERCEPTOR
HANAPEPE-ELEELE KWTK
LAHAINA SEWERS
COWLEY
LADARGE
TUCSON
TUCSON
FT. DEFIANCE
SAN FRANCISCO
KERMAN
SCOTTS VALLEY
ANGELS
BOLI'NAS
FAIRFIELD
BISHOP
N. LAKEPORT
MT. SHASTA
YUBA CITY
MONTCLAIR
NAPA
SACRAMENTO
COULTON
SAN MATED
CENTRAL VALLEY
SANTA ANA
STOCKTON
SONORA
MCKINLEYVILLE
TAHOE VISTA
LOS ANGELES
FRESNO
HANAPEPE-ELEELE
LAHAINA
WYOMING
WYOMING
ARIZONA
ARIZONA
ARIZONA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CAL IFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CAL IFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNI4
CALIFORNIA
CAL I FORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
HAWAI I
HAWA 1 I
B IG HORN
L I NC OL N
PIMA
P IMA
APACHE
SAN FRANCISCO
FRESNO
SANTA CRUZ
CALAVERAS
MAR IN
SOLANO
INYO
LAKE
SISKIYOU
SUTTER
SAN BERNARDINO
NAPA
SACRAMENTO
SAN BERNARDINO
SAN MATED
SHASTA
ORANGE
SAN JOAQUIN
TUOLUMNF
HUMBOLT-
NEVAOA
LOS ANGELES
FRESNO
KAIJAI
MAIM
110
110
110
110
110
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
123
114
123
123
114
123
123
114
123
123
123
123
114
123
127
127
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
150057 KULAIMANO SF.V>f:.RS
320076 YEKINGTCIN SEVERS
320083 NELLIS INTERCEPTOR PH. I
320084 EAST LAS VEGAS LIFT STA
320038 INCLINE COLLECT ION
320091 BEATTY SEWERS
320094 FERNLEY INTERCEPTOR
320097 MCDERMITT SEVERS
320106 NFLUS INTERCEPTOR
320107 OVERTON STP
320108 SEARCHLIGHT SEVERS
66000'* MANGILAO INTERCEPTOR
660005 DEDEOO-YIGO INTERCEPTOR
660007 NORTHERN DIST. WWTF
660008 BARRIGADA SEWERAGE
02003B KOOIAK SYSTEP
020039 FAIRBANKS WHIP
020043 HAINES STP 6 COLL
020046 SKAGWAY STP G COLLECT ION
020047 PETERSBURG WhTP
160144 PARIS SEWERAGE
160156 WOODRUFF AVE INT.
160176 SEWER SYSTEM
160185 SOUTH FORK CGEUR D'ALENE
160204 CULDESAC KWTF
410365 DEPOE DAY STP
410390 INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM
410411 RFOWOOD SANITARY DISTRICT
410416 CLOVERDALE STP
<»1O*»85 BE AVERTON —ROCK CREEK INT.
KULAIMANO
YERINGTON
LAS VEGAS
EAST LAS VEGAS
INCLINE VILLAGE
BEATTY
FERNLEY
MCDERMITT
LAS VEGAS
OVERTON
SEARCHLIGHT
MANGILAO
NORTHERN DIST
NORTHERN DISTR.
BARRIGADA VILLA
KOOIAK
FAIRBANKS
HAINES
SKAGWAY
PETERSBURG
PARIS
IDAHO FALLS
SALMON
WALLACE
CULDESAC
OfiPOE BAY
PENDLETON
GRANTS PASS
CLUVERDALE
HILLSBORO
HAWAII
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
NEVADA
GUAM
GUAM
GUAM
GUAM
ALASKA
ALASKA
ALASKA
ALASKA
ALASKA
IDAHO
IDAHO
IDAHO
IDAHO
IDAHO
OREGON
OREGON
OREGON
OREGON
HAW A I 1
L YON
CLARK
CLARK
WASHOE
NYE
LYON
HUMHOLOT
CLARK
CLARK
CLARK
KODIAK IS
NORTH STAR
HAINES
SKAGWAY
WRANGELL
BEAR LAKE
BONNEVILLE
LEHHI
SHOSHCJNE
NEZ PERCE
LINCOLN
UMATILLA
JOSEPHINE
T ILLAMOOK
127
123
114
114
123
123
123
114
114
114
114
126
126
126
126
126
126
126
126
126
123
123
123
124
124
123
123
123
123
OREGON
WASHINGTON
-------
TABLE B.I (Continued)
td
410555 GLEN CREEK TRUNK SEWER
530466 BIRCH PAYfWHATEOM CQHD#8I
530470 SEWARO PARK INTERCEPTOR
530488 WESTPORT WWTF
530521 HOOOLAWN SEWERS
530538 TAUSICK WAY INTERCEPTOR
530549 STEVENS PASS-YODEL IN STP
530553 WHITE SWAN W £ S
530581 FOX AVE INTERCEPTOR
530T40 GLENWOOD STP(KLICKITAT CO
SALEM
BLAINE
SEATTLE
WESTPQRT
HOQUIAM
WALLAWALLA
KIRKLAND
YAK I MA INDIAN
SEATTLE
GOLD'ENOALE
OREGON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
POLK
WHATCOM
KING
GRAYS HARBOR
GRAYS HARBOR
WALLA WALLA
K1NG/CHELAN
Y AK1MA
KING
KLICKITAT
123
1Z4
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER; 04")
REGION 10
WASHINGTON
NATIONAL TOTALS
PVC
AC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
DEPTH (FT)
<8 9-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH 15
DEPTH 15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 3
1 3
1 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
15
TOTALS
4
4
4
M
00
REGION 01
NEW HAMPSHIRE
REGION 03
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
MICHIGAN
OHIO
REGION 06
ARKANSAS
TEXAS
REGION 08
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
REGION 10
WASHINGTON
NATIONAL TOTALS
PVC
AC
(DIAMETER! 06")
ci
RCP
DIP
OTHER
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3
2
1
5 1
1
4 1
8 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2
•"I
2
2
4
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
7
7
142
142
3
3
5 7 1
2
3 7 1
6 21 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
t> •">
1
1 2
2 2
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 3
1 3
1 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1
1
1
DEPTH 15
1
1
2
2
2 1
1
rOTALS
9
9
8
7
1
11
I
5
5
17
3
14
&
1
5
4
4
55
g
f
w
td
S3
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER; OB")
PVC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
VERMONT
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
DELAWARE
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
REGION 04
ALABAMA
GEORGIA
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
ARKANSAS
LOUISIANA
OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
REGION 07
KANSAS
REGION 08
COLORADO
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
REGION 10
WASHINGTON
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH 15
5 16 3
1 3
1 2
3 11 3
1 IS 11
182
2
4 3
A 6
1 12 8
173
5. 5
7 46 22
DEPTH (FT)
15
8 5
5 2
3 3
12 33 25
10 24 23
292
11 42 16
1 4
5 27 16
5 9
2
141
141
2 15 2
281
4
3 1
2
2
26 104 49
DEPTH (FT)
15
1 19 8
1 1
9 6
9 2
5 36 15
3 22 10
2 14 5
13 50 23
2 2
241
3 25 19
281
6 11
7 20 5
392
243
1 2
1 5
10 84 55
3
10 45 21
11
12 21
13 13
12 41 7
1
2 4
1 3
8 34 7
1 3
1 3
4? 253 113
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-- 15 MS
3111
161
2 5
1 4
1 3
1
3 6
3 6
1 2
1
2
8 23 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >lf
1 3
1 3
1 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
4
1
1
2
4 14 8
4 12 8
2
2 4
2 4
2 1
1
1 1
1 3
1
2
1
1 1
1 1
10 27 6
DEPTH (FT)
<8 B-15 >15
1 3
1 3
3 22 10
2 13 2
198
242
242
6 29 12
TOTALS
45
1
9
22
13
152
116
36
204
8
12
110
55
19
46
14
19
4
9
246
4
124
17
42
59
73
2
14
4
53
4
4
23
•->
11
10
4
4
777
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 10")
PVC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
W
ro
O
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
VERMONT
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
DELAWARE
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
REGION 04
ALABAMA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
MISSISSIPPI
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
LOUISIANA
TEXAS
REGION 08
SOUTH DAKOTA
REGION 10
WASHINGTON
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
271
141
1 3
3 15 9
3 15 9
8 6
3
2
1
2 6
4
4
S 34 16
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
4
3
1
4 18 17
4 15 13
3 4
8 32 15
146
5 24 9
2 4
3 16 7
144
2 12 3
14 7
8 5
4
2 2
15 84 46
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
15 6
1 1
4 1
10 4
1 17 1
1 9
8 1
2 32 9
2 1
1
1 23 8
1 6
7 21 1
3 12 1
2 4
2 5
6 48 34
2 4
6 22 10
8
9 11
7 9
8 22 4
2 4 1
6 18 3
24 155 55
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2
2
2
1
1
2 7
1
2 5
1
1 3
1 3
1 2
1 2
4 14 2
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 3
1 3
1
1
1 3
1 3
2 61
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
6 2
2
4 2
1 1
1 1
4 7
1
3 7
2 1
1 1
1
1
1
5 17 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
141
141
2 20 11
1 12 3
188
_3_. 24 12
TOTALS
35
2
O
3
8
20
64
42
22
116
9
13
77
10
7
102
16
1
22
17
9
37
164
6
74
14
23
47
38
7
31
4
4
4
4
527
5
W
to
r>
o
S
rt
H-
g
n>
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER? 12')
PVC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
VERMONT
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
DELAWARE
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
REGION 04
ALABAMA
GEORGIA
MISSISSIPPI
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
LOUISIANA
TEXAS
REGION 08
SOUTH DAKOTA
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
15
3
3
2 8
2 8
5 6
4 2
1 4
4 4
4 4
4
4
2 24 1C
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
10
8
2
2 18 18
1 13 14
154
9 30 6
363
4 18 3
2 6
2 15 8
1 5
1 10 8
4 2
2
2 2
13 77 34
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
12 5
2
4 2
6 3
4 23 7
3 15 6
181
3 13 5
1 1
8 4
1 3
2 1
193
3
3 3
1 3
3 61 48
153
2 17 7
9 3
9 26
21 9
8 33 4
2
8 31 4
19 151 72
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 10
2 10
3 14 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 M5
1
1
1
1
4 1
4 1
1 1
1
1
7 2
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 1
1
:
1 33
133
2 1
1 1
1
126
1
2 6
4 7 10
DEPTH (FT)
15
121
1 21
2 13 14
1 74
1 6 10
2
3
3 15 18
TOTALS
31
3
1
8
10
9
81
59
22
80
5
12
48
12
3
55
3
16
19
6
11
169
10
38
20
44
57
68
2
66
4
4
488
bet
•
i-o
rt
H-
g
CD
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER; 14 •>
pvc
AC
vc
ci
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
VIRGINIA
MINNESOTA
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
15
177
5 7
1 2
177
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >1S
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2
2
2
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
141
141
1 1
1 1
251
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
TOTALS
21
12
9
4
2
2
25
e
f
w
O
o
n>
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETERt 15')
PMC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
Ni
U>
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
VERMONT
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
DELAWARE
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
REGION 04
ALABAMA
GEORGIA
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
TEXAS
REGION 08
COLORADO
SOUTH DAKOTA
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2 7
2 7
1 1
1 1
A
1
3
2 12 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
254
132
122
5 20 9
5 20 9
4 10
4 10
2
2
7 31 23
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
6 4
2 2
4 2
294
294
4 10 5
141
2 4
1 3
2 1
2 7
1 3
1 4
H
1 24 5
1 6
8 1
1
9 4
3 9
3 9
12 65 18
DEPTH (FT)
O 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
142
1 3
1 2
1 2
1 2
3 1
3 1
243
1
143
1 20 18
4
141
6 1
6 13
3
5 33 24
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1
1
1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >1
1 3
1 3
6 8
6 8
1 98
TOTALS
17
4
3
4
6
29
6
23
61
6
44
8
3
41
4
1
14
8
5
9
67
11
15
10
19
32
13
13
4
1
3
252
i
M
W
3
rt
H-
1
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER; 16')
PVC
AC
vc
ci
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 01
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
W REGION 03
I DELAWARE
£ VIRGINIA
REGION 04
MISSISSIPPI
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
REGION 05
INDIANA
REGION 10
WASHINGTON
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH 15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 B-15 >15
3 2
3 2
7 3
2 2
5 1
1
1
3 1
3 1
14 6
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
185
185
185
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3
3
1 2
1 2
1 5
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
125
125
1 2 5
DEPTH (FT)
15
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
363
112
141
1 1
1
1
4115
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
TOTALS
8
5
3
35
29
6
5
4
1
15
4
9
2
1
1
4
4
68
o
o
a
rt
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 18')
PVC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
W
t-0
un
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
VIRGIN ISLANDS
REGION 03
DELAWARE
MARYLAND
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
REGION 04
FLORIDA
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
TEXAS
REGION 10
WASHINGTON
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
t>
6
2 13 8
165
173
6 24 16
1 1
5 21 16
2
1 4
1 4
1 3
1 3
2 1
2 1
10 52 25
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2 13 5
1 3
184
2 1
2 12 2
3
292
2 12 1
1
141
1 7
1 16 9
2
10 3
1 46
5 18 4
5 18 4
12 71 21
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1
1
5
5
5 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >lf
1 7
1 6
1
273
143
1 3
2 1
2 1
4 15 6
286
2 7
20 29
2 10
9 4
8 9
1 6
7 51 39
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
3
3
I
\
1 1
1 1
375
2 4
1
1 4 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1 10
1 10
4 12 18
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
1
1
7 5
2
5 5
1 75
TOTALS
17
10
1
6
56
24
29
3
69
5
2
59
3
60
1
6
28
14
11
93
18
15
13
18
29
43
43
3
3
341
E
£
W
NJ
O
O
3
I
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 20')
PVC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
bd
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
VIRGINIA
REGION 05
INDIANA
REGION 06
TEXAS
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
6 5
3 5
3
6 5
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 3
1 3
1 3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
15
3
3
1 1
1 1
1
1
1 4 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
fOTALS
3
3
11
8
3
2
2
1
1
4
4
21
gs
f
M
W
O
O
0
ft
H-
3
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 21')
PVC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
,Jj REGION 03
-4 DELAWARE
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
REGION 04
GEORGIA
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
NEW MEXICO
TEXAS
REGION 08
COLORADO
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH 15
2 1
2 :
2 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2 12 4
284
4
1 4 6
146
3 16 10
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2 3
2 3
166
3
2 1
142
2
1
1
298
2 6
272
3 19 17
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3 2
2
1 2
3 15 3
3 15 3
1 2
1 2
141
141
2 27 36
1 10 4
1
9 25
1 77
6 50 44
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
4 1
2
2 1
4 1
TOTALS
5
2
3
44
35
9
27
3
17
7
6
6
72
16
3
1
34
18
19
8
11
3
3
176
B
tr"
W
O
O
g
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER? 24')
PVC
AC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 01
CONNECTICUT
MAINE
NEW HAMPSHIRE
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
VIRGIN ISLANDS
REGION 03
W DELAWARE
^3 PENNSYLVANIA
00 VIRGINIA
REGION 04
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
REGION 06
TEXAS
REGION 08
COLORADO
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3
3
3
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
1 20 7
194
11 3
4
4
6
6
1 3
1 3
2 27 13
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
172
4 2
1 3
3113
131
1
4 1
141
7 4
3 2
3 1
1 1
1118
1118
5 36 17
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
1
1
1 5
1 5
2 5
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
5 5
2 1
1 1
2 3
15 14
13 13
2 1
2 16 11
1 12 10
141
5 24 16
4 2
4 16 12
142
1 34 42
1 10 4
16 19
2 6
6 13
8 94 88
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
•t
2
2 12 12
4 9
4 3
1 4
1
5 1
1 1
4
1
1
3 19 13
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 MS
1 2
1 2
1 9 12
2 3
1 1
6 9
2 11 12
fOTALS
10
3
2
5
63
40
17
6
43
6
27
10
94
5
7
19
44
11
8
120
24
9
37
10
40
27
27
3
3
360
w
O
o
ft
H-
13
ro
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER? 27')
PVC
AC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 04
* MISSISSIPPI
l-o
^ REGION 05
ILLINOIS
MICHIGAN
OHIO
REGION 06
TEXAS
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
146
146
146
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8- IS >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 94
1 5
4 4
1 2
1 2
1 10 24
3 6
1 7 18
2 20 30
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2 5
1
2 4
2 5
TOTALS
14
6
8
3
3
42
9
1
32
11
11
70
td
o
o
o
ft
H-
g
(D
CX
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 30."..)
PVC
AC
Cl
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 01
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
VIRGIN ISLANDS
REGION 03
PENNSYLVANIA
REGION 04
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
OHIO
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2
2
2
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
2 4
2 4
2 4
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
7 4
2 4
5
3 38 29
2 30 23
183
2
1 4 9
149
3 16 28
2 8 14
1 89
1 17 34
1 12 12
1
1
2 1C
1 12
8 82 104
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1
1
283
141
142
2
295
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 1
1 1
2
2
2
5 1
TOTALS
12
7
5
74
57
12
5
14
14
62
5
30
27
62
25
1
1
14
21
224
E
£
td
NJ
O
O
O
It
H-
9
(D
Q.
( DIAMETER; 33U
PVC
AC
ci
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
.
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
_._
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
12 3
8 3
4
1 2
1 2
13 5
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
rOTALS
15
11
4
3
3
18
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 36")
PVC
AC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
W
REGION 01
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
REGION 03
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
REGION 04
FLORIDA
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
MICHIGAN
OHIO
NATIONAL. TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 9
1 9
1 9
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3 5
2 2
1 3
3 45 49
3 37 43
8 6
1 45
1
1 44
1 17 27
142
3
13 22
1 19 11
1 17 11
*3
6 88 97
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 4 1
141
1 4 1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
6 G
6 8
6 8
TOTAL
8
4
4
97
83
14
10
1
9
51
7
3
t>
35
55
29
2
24
*>O J
&
O
o
3
3
(P
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER? 42'>
PVC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
REGION 04
FLORIDA
NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTH CAROLINA
REGION 05
f ILLINOIS
U> OHIO
S3
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
5 16
5 16
11 14
2
8 5
3 7
12 16
12 10
6
28 46
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
144
144
144
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3 3
3 3
3 3
TOTALS
21
21
34
2
22
10
34
22
12
89
t-1
w
W
*
1X3
s
tt
H-
g
m
(DIAMETER! 46')
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NATIONAL TOTALS
PVC
AC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1
1
1
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
TOTALS
1
1
1
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER? 48')
PVC
AC
VC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
7
u>
U)
REGION 01
MAINE
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
REGION 04
NORTH CAROLINA
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH 15
1 4
1 4
7 14
7 14
145
145
1 12 23
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
TOTALS
5
5
21
21
10
10
36
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER! 54')
f
M
o
o
pj
ft
H*
g
tB
G.
PVC
AC
vc
ci
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
REGION 04
SOUTH CAROLINA
REGION 05
ILLINOIS
OHIO
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1 2
1 2
9 27
9 27
4
4
14 29
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
1
1
1
TOTALS
3
3
36
36
5
4
1
44
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETERi 60')
PVC
AC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
REGION 04
W SOUTH CAROLINA
!£ REGION 05
OHIO
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH 15
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
15
16 23
16 23
1 11
1 11
2 16
2 16
19 50
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
3 9
3 9
3 9
TOTALS
39
39
24
24
18
18
81
g
tr1
M
o
§
-------
DISTRIBUTION OF SEWERS SAMPLE
BY PIPE TYPE AND DEPTH
(DIAMETER: 66")
PVC
MC
CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
OJ
Ul
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
REGION 05
OHIO
NATIONAL TOTALS
REGION 02
NEW JERSEY
NATIONAL TOTALS
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
7
7
1 5
1 5
1 12
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
TOTALS
7
7
6
6
13
PVC
AC
(DIAMETER? 72')
VC CI
RCP
DIP
OTHER
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 M5
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
5 23
5 23
5 23
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
DEPTH (FT)
<8 8-15 >15
TOTALS
28
28
28
6
5
W
*
NJ
O
0
rt
H-
3
I
-------
E.P.A. MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION COST STUDY
SAMPLED SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
CO
MAP B.I
-------
APPENDIX C
COST INDEXING
-------
C-l
APPENDIX C
COST INDEXING
C.I REQUIREMENTS
Construction bid data employed in developing cost relationships
presented in this report originated across a wide spectrum of time
and location. Bid dates ranged from second quarter 1973 to second
quarter 1977 and locations varied from Alaska to Puerto Rico. Data
included Step I and Step II grant costs, non-construction item costs for
administrative, legal and contingency expenses, and lump-sum costs for
conveyance system facilities. Because of these variations it was neces-
sary to devise a system for referencing costs to a common dollar base for
the purposes of data analysis.
For the purposes of this study several indexing tools were consi-
dered. Criteria for selection of the most appropriate method included the
following:
1. National Scope - The data base included facilities nationwide;
therefore the indexing method had to apply to all geographical
areas of the country.
2. Sufficient Time Span - Bids to be updated were, in some cases,
four years old. The indices must be applicable to each quarter
from 1973 to the present.
-------
C-2
3. Sewer Construction Oriented - The mix of material and labor
components had to reflect that typical of wastewater conveyance
facilities.
4. Commonly Accepted and Available - Due to the possibility
of future use of this study as well as its potential for
updating, the indexing method had to be available to and accept-
ed by the user community.
C.2 COST INDEXING SYSTEMS INVESTIGATED
There are a number of cost indexing systems in existence, each
directed at the needs of a specific user. Some, such as the Consumer
Price Index, are general in nature and applicable to a variety of pro-
ducts and services. Others, like the Federal Highway Index, serve
specific estimating needs. Generally, input to the development of each
index consists of a mix of material and labor costs. The composition of
this mix determines the relevance of a given index to a particular
construction estimating requirement.
Using the criteria above, several cost indexing methods were inves-
tigated for use in this study, including the Engineering News Record
(ENR) Building Cost Index, the ENR Construction Cost Index, the Bureau of
Reclamation Index, the EPA Complete Urban Sewer System (CUSS) Index, and
two contractor cost indices. Based on this investigation, the EPA CUSS
Index was chosen as most representative of sanitary sewer construction
cost trends.
-------
C-3
The EPA CUSS Index is updated quarterly and published in the Engi-
neering News Record periodically. Table C.I is a tabulation of the CUSS
index from its origination to third quarter, 1977. Values listed in
these tables are final values and may in some cases vary slightly from
preliminary calculations published in the Engineering News Record.
C.3 ALASKA, HAWAII, GUAM, PUERTO RIC INDICES
Because construction bid information was collected for facilities
in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam, indices were required to update
those costs. The indices listed in Table C.I for facilities in these
states of territories were developed using the following procedure:
1. From the data bank of the 1976 Needs Survey, including over
23,000 conveyance facilities, multipliers were developed for
Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and Puerto Rico for newly constructed
facilities. These multipliers are a ratio of the average cost
of construction in the particular state to the national average
cost of construction for similar facilities. Only costs based
on engineers' estimates and cost of previous comparable con-
struction were used for this analysis.
2. The 25 city index average for each quarter was then multiplied
by the appropriate Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, or Puerto Rico multi-
plier, yielding a quarterly index for these four areas.
-------
C-4
C.4 USE OF THE EPA CUSS INDEX
C.4.1 City Influence Boundaries
Applying the appropriate quarterly index to a construction bid
required the determination of which EPA index city most influenced the
contract prices. The areas of influence designated by Map C.I are the
result of application of the following criteria:
1. County boundaries were followed without exception.
2. State boundaries were followed where more definitive infor-
mation was unavailable.
3. Bureau of Labor Statistics Information was used to draw
boundaries where such information was available.
Due to the fact that labor is generally the largest single cost
component for a sanitary sewer facility, an effort was made to define
boundaries on Map C.I based on Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics data. The Bureau regularly collects and tabulates wage
rates for a variety of construction skills for 102 cities nationwide.
From these tabulations a combined rate for carpenters, masons and build-
ing laborers was derived for 15 quarters dating from third quarter 1973
to first quarter 1977. These three skills were chosen because they
correspond to the labor skills that comprise the labor component of the
EPA index. Next, the 15 quarters of record for each of the 102 BLS
cities were statistically correlated to the labor component history of
-------
C-5
each of the EPA index cities yielding a correlation coefficient repre-
senting the similarity of that city's labor costs to each EPA city. These
correlations were then used to define areas of influence for CUSS index
cities. For example, the correlations of the BLS cities, Chattanooga,
Nashville and Knoxville with the CUSS city of Birmingham were all much
higher than their correlations with the CUSS city of Cincinnati. There-
fore, Birmingham's influence boundary was drawn to include Tennessee.
Similarly, the wage rate histories of the Atlanta and Miami Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSA) were so radically different than
those of the closest BLS city histories that the areas of influence for
those two cities include only the respective SMSA's.
C.5 COMMON-BASE COST CONVERSIONS
Using Map C.I along with Table C.I, construction bid data for a
given location and date may be converted to a common dollar base for
development of a national average cost relationship. An example of this
might be a bid cost of X dollars in January, 1975 for a conveyance
system in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The influence city is found from Map C.I to
be Denver, Colorado. From Table C.I the first quarter 1975 index for
Denver is 87. To convert the cost to third quarter 1977 dollars, X
should be multiplied by 115/87 or 1.32. Conversely, cost values taken
from national average cost curves must be multiplied by the ratio of the
index for the appropriate city and the national average index for the
same quarter to arrive at a cost estimate based on the economy of the
specific city.
-------
TABLE C,l
EPA COMPLETE URBAN SEWER SYSTEM (CUSS) INDEX
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
NO,
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
CITY NAME
Atlanta
Baltimore
Birmingham
Boston
Charlotte
Chicago
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Dallas
Denver
Detroit
Houston
Kansas City
Los Angeles
Miami
Milwaukee
Minneapolis
New Orleans
New York
Philadelphia
Pittsburg
St. Louis
San Francisco
Seattle
Trenton
25 City Average
Alaska
Hawaii
Guam
Puerto Rico
3
80
98
74
111
54
112
107
108
72
77
114
72
100
117
89
102
94
89
142
123
110
126
108
103
120
101
268
129
125
63
4
81
98
78
115
54
114
109
116
69
79
114
69
101
113
90
106
94
93
142
125
115
124
109
104
120
102
271
130
127
64
1
82
98
79
115
54
117
109
117
70
79
114
70
101
114
90
109
95
93
144
125
118
126
112
105
120
103
271
132
128
C5
2
85
100
81
118
56
124
118
122
79
86
124
77
108
116
92
113
103
100
144
144
123
127
112
108
133
108
289
139
135
68
3
86
118
81
132
56
123
121
122
79
87
127
77
113
115
92
113
100
101
148
147
125
149
113
108
136
111
297
143
139
70
4
85
118
83
134
55
122
122
121
79
86
125
82
115
122
96
117
99
100
150
142
126
145
119
112
134
112
299
144
140
71
1
88
119
88
140
55
138
125
137
84
87
128
90
119
124
97
121
112
103
155
146
130
146
127
118
137
117
312
150
146
73
2
92
115
90
145
60
140
128
141
85
88
131
92
125
125
102
127
112
112
155
144
133
147
134
122
135
120
319
154
149
75
3
93
115
93
145
69
140
131
142
86
92
132
94
128
130
102
127
112
116
164
158
133
153
135
133
135
122
326
157
153
77
4
92
124
93
145
68
141
132
142
86
96
132
94
128
141
101
129
114
116
168
148
133
153
135
133
136
124
330
159
154
78
1
. 96
129
94
150
67
144
135
145
90
96
140
97
128
139
106
130
120
118
168
152
135
156
138
135
145
126
338
163
158
80
2
102
137
97
149
70
148
139
145
96
99
140
104
133
137
112
130
122
122
169
157
135
164
146
149
144
130
348
167
162
82
3
1Q3
137
97
150
74
153
139
149
96
99
141
104
135
1.46
112
133
125
122
171
158
135
164
149
150
147
132
352
170
165
83
4
102
138
97
151
76
153
139
149
97
105
140
104
135
155
111
133
126
127
171
158
136
164
149
149
147
133
355
171
166
84
1
110
138
96
152
75
154
143
154
97
110
151
107
135
159
116
136
130
134
172
162
147
165
151
146
147
136
363
174
169
86
2
111
138
102
153
77
158
144
158
103
115
158
113
136
159
117
140
133
135
173
168
148
166
151
150
150
139
370
177
172
88
3
112
140
105
162
77
164
153
164
104
115
159
117
144
166
120
146
135
142
182
167
154
171
160
158
152
143
382
183
177
91
o
-------
E.P.A. MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX MAP
SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES - CITY MULTIPLIERS
,:;;/%>-
|ir---Ji:54'"'i~r!~~ii!.-j ""^ .^Jsx^'vkr---- ^r^'ini*^ >V(
•H '""^is'^iB'y^^^fed^^^S^ t(j:^'??//-\ "•! / :-"C''-^;'i^|>-^P!i.??f ON
=^saas»s»&SI! ^m%}°^;aiiip^f-
TT~tvf%^::a=13'S'3:p-, .^^^ v°EIBS'^l /.•' ,\i-:5:"^--^-iR^^vo
.:- .^^4iJ^feK^KTS.TcXoo ..4-4?%^^ / * CL.V.L.NO if»j^ T««TON
^^ffi^^ils^^^Moi^
-119
YORK
106J*
tv^-t-r;
f** • v-J, •'" iH"-i' ••"
^"f^feu;'
*':! PITTSBURGH 5
•**:;
"^ -_ KAN="SCI7Y Wy: ,te '•
in-i-fj^jij^-l-l-R^-iffij
illlliHSfe
CINCINNATI
:pSffiki
''='.!•'* ST. LOUIS ';•
=il22iP^107^
JMS
'?%$K-
LOS ANGELES
T:,O/ :7...;' -'• ::ll:::ff^^^^^@m
°*« / "• TiVcP ..;J-^S!fe&Ji^WW'i^iT
- *"•./- "~ :'~ ' "Vp-^^^^m'^^^
1 -. •-• / / Hi'"""'""; - '"Ci:f j^M"j?°^t?SlS|^^S^I^^v
i&^W
35'ibii
•<• CHARLOTTE f
BIRMINGHAM
115 ...
^. ,^^ru ,N
,z ^,
..-' :* ... ** ^'^
\
^1:-^--^, .^-V
.~;r.:.->."»:.:-;, , fiV
o
MAP C.I
-------
APPENDIX D
SANITARY SWIER COST TABLES
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
O
I
D.TAM REG 01
04 * 13.81
N= 2
06 * 28.99
N= 2:1.
08 * 44.46
N= 87
10 * 81.30
N= 54
12 * 63.49
N= 56
15 * 100.00
N= 29
16 * 110.13
N= 12
18 * 133,73
N== 25
21 $ 158.59
N= 6
24 * 20:1. .03
N= 16
27 * .00
N= 0
30 * 181,26
N= 17
36 * 230.72
N= 15
42 * 265.07
N= 2
48 * 44V, 96
N- 7
54 » .00
N= 0
60 * 49ft. 17
N= 1
66 * .00
N= 0
REG 02
* . 00
N= 0
* 21.30
N= 2
* 43.66
N= 162
* 55.41
N= 71
* 77 . 40
N= 87
* 120.65
N= 23
$ 81.76
N= 42
* 120.21
N= 56
$ 141,90
N= 46
* 143.79
N= 73
* 119. 1 5
N= 26
* 186.55
N== 85
* 217.72
N= 115
* 270.64
N= 21
* 266,93
N= 21
* 366.01.
N- 8
* 377.35
N= 43
* 490.56
N= 10
KEG 03
* 10.72
N- 24
$ 26 . 35
N~ 58
* 32.76
N= 316
* 44 . 03
N-= 171
* 43.90
N= 113
* 64,78
N= 80
* 63.77
N= 9
* 70,71
N= 89
* 89.68
N= 37
$ 106.63
N= 59
$ 185.20
N= 8
$ 201.70
N= 16
* 219.56
N~ 19
* 292.35
N= 5
$ 164,47
N= 5
* .00
N- 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 04
* 4.51
N= 1
* 9.10
N» 2
* 19.71
N= 67
* 26 . 02
N= 110
* 35 . 1 3
N= 57
* 44.97
N= 42
* 53.08
N= 15
* 46.76
N= 60
* 36 . 34
N= 6
* 88.25
N= 98
* 96.30
N= 4
$ 104.03
N-= 66
* 178.60
N= 54
t 242.07
N= 34
* 197.66
N= 10
$ 268.71
N=» 36
t 286.09
N= 24
* .00
N= 0
REG 05
* 15.34
N= 22
* 24 . 29
N*= 155
* 34.41
N= 471
* 38 . 22
N= 330
* 48.46
N= 319
* 53 . 1 0
N= 182
* 80.01
N= 13
* 86 . 53
N= 184
$ 75.56
N= 106
* 86.97
N= 167
* 121.26
N= 70
$ 116.58
N= 125
* 160.55
N= 107
* 249.04
N= 75
* 269.35
N= 44
* 216.14
N= 20
* 449.57
N= 37
* 338.99
N= 21
it
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
$
$
*
$
$
*
*
$
REG 06
12.51
N= 24
16.83
N= 39
22.51
N= 189
28.28
N= 103
41.51
N= 140
37.00
N= 53
.00
N= 0
59.70
N= 89
57.51
N= 20
100.99
N= 42
77.10
N= 11
131.63
N= 11
127.46
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
$
*
$
*
*
*
*
$
*
t
$
$
*
$
*
t
*
*
RE.G 07
5.52
N= 1
16.41
N= 3
18.44
N= 9
26,73
N= 3
31.17
N= 4
68.88
N= 1
.00
N= 0
41.79
N= 4
43.29
N= 1
57.10
N= 3
.00
N= 0
71.99
N- 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N== 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
$
*
*
$
*
$
$
*
$
$
$
$
$
*
t
*
Ji
$
REG 08
6.87
N= 5
13.42
N= 9
18.97
N= 57
24 , 20
N= 14
32.07
N= 19
38,13
N= 11
46.18
N= 2
47.78
N= 6
58.82
N= 3
60.41
N= 8
.00
N= 0
105.52
N= 3
91.63
N= 1
107.07
N= 3
519.96
N= 2
282,98
N= 1
326.62
N= 6
360.73
N= 10
*
%
t
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
t
$
RED 09
11,39
N= 22
18.53
N= 28
27.02
N= 29
40.87
N~ 20
47.54
N= 18
51.26
N= 10
57.25
N= 1
89 . 24
N= 13
64.90
N= 13
104.43
N= 10
93,10
N= 12
104.39
N= 9
109.55
N= 9
245.58
N= 14
232.94
N= 1 4
235,96
N- 1
289.57
N= 2
307.58
N= 2
RE6 10
* 12.34
N= 16
* 30.43
N= 15
* 39.25
N= 49
* 24.84
N= 11
* 60.12
N= 12
$ 115.43
N= 5
* 102.71
N= 7
$ 124.28
N= 7
* ,00
N= 0
* 154.94
N= 9
$ .00
N= 0
$ 279.15
N= 5
* 220.63
N= 1
* 253,34
N= 1
* 266.78
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
NATIONAL
* 12.09
N= 117
* 23 . 39
N= 332
* 32,75
N=1436
* 40.30
N= 887
* 49.50
N= 825
* 59.52
N= 436
* 79.55
N= 101
* 80.47
N= 533
* 89.23
N= 238
* 104.15
N= 485
* 117.69
N= 131
$ 14.1.35
N= 338
* 189.19
N= 322
* 249.01
N= 155
$ 26B.98
N= 104
* 264.29
N= 66
t 378.44
N= 113
* 377.83
N= 43
-------
78
. 00
N= 0
* 517,96 * 277,59 $ ,00
N= 9 N- 0
.00
N= 0
* . 00 *
N= 0 N=
* 310,27 * ,00 *
N= 19 N= 0 N==
.00 * 393,59 $
0 N= 4
N=
,00 *
0
,00 * 460.02 $ 319.46 * .00 * 411,37
0 N= 22 N= 2 N= 0 N= 73
,00 * 5.1.9.20 * 341,19 * .00 * 479.42
0 N= 26 N= 5 N= 0 N= 35
.00
0
*1254.55
N= 2
N=
,00
0
.00 * 528.75 *
0 N~ 11
.00 *
0 N=
.00
0
* ,00
N= 0
* 340,54
IM= 1
.00
N= 0
* 618.99
N= 14
90
.00
0
.00
N=
N =
.00
0
.00
0
* 620.27 * .00
N= 4 N= 0
N=
.00 * ,00
0 N= 0
.00
0
* .00
N= 0
$ 620.27
N= 4
96
.00 *
N=
N =
.00 *
0
N-
.00 $ 863,04 *
N=
0
N=
.00
N=
.00 *
N=
,00
N=
* 465,56
N= 1
.00
0
* 730.55
N= 3
o
I
ro
O
o
3
rt
H>
3
C
n>
Cb
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
O
CO
IAM UNIT COST
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
7 !:1
84
90
VA
*
4
*
*
*
*
*
4
4
*
4
*
*
*
4
*
*
*
*
4
*
4
*
9 . 78
14,53
20.85
24.20
28.36
32.70
43.96
39.67
43.28
51.13
62.58
70 . 20
91.71
141. SB
1 44 . 03
149.67
1 90 . 1 1
233.15
241 .71
294.82
437.68
372.49
563.03
APPIJRT <4/FT>
4
4
4
$
4
*
4
4
t
*
4
*
*
4
*
*
*
$
t
$
4
*
4
1.29
5.01
6.26
8.81
11.97
16.04
16.70
23.22
23.14
29.79
33.05
37.22
57.19
65.53
70 . 52
62 . 24
1 22 . 36
82.12
100.99
110.24
90 . 25
126.74
63.43
NCIN
4
4
4
4
4
4
*
4
4
*
4
4
*
$
*
4
t
$
$
$
4
4
$
-•CONS (4/FTJ TOTAL COST
1
3
5
7
9
10
18
17
22
23
22
33
40
41
54
53
65
60
68
74
91
121
104
.02
.03
.62
.28
.15
.76
.88
.57
.80
.21
.06
.92
,28
.88
.41
.38
.95
. 55
.65
.34
.05
. 03
.08
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
*
4
4
4
12.09
23.38
32.75
40,30
49.49
59.52
79,55
80.47
89.23
104.15
117,69
141.35
189.19
249,01
268,98
264.29
378.44
377.83
411,37
479.42
618.99
620.27
730.55
(4/FT)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(PMC PIPE)
li/AM REG 01 REG 0? REO 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
04
06
08
O
i. 10
12
15
18
t . 00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* 25 . 513
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* 49.76
N= 1
* ,00
N= 0
* ,00
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=
$
N=
*
N=
t
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
*
N-
* 20
N=
* 29
N =
* 44
N=
* 63
N=
*
N=
t
.00
0
.31
1
.14
24
,87
10
.32
3
.00
0
.00
4 4
N=
* 9
N=
* 1.4
N=
4 22
N=
* 22
N=
* 30
N=
t
.51
1
.10
1
.87
2
.53
31
.58
.1.0
.18
9
.00
*
$
*
4
*
*
*
23
N=
18
N=
103
N=
59
N=
11.2
N=
50
N=
4.1.
.02
1
.03
14
.57
35
.94
17
.07
14
.72
5
.73
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
17.38
N= 11
20,86
N= 1
15.19
N= 4
.00
N=> 0
43.5(3
N= 8
.00
N= 0
.00
* 5.52
N= 1
* 8.9U
N= 1
* 0.53
N= 1
t 10.75
N= 1
$ 13.25
N= 1
t ,00
N= 0
* .00
* 7
N=
* 11
N=
* 19
Nn
t 25
N=
* 32
N=
* 52
N=
$
.57
3
.15
7
.40
21
.21
4
.51
4
.45
3
.00
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 35.15
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
t
$
*
*
*
$
*
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
34.54
N= 2
36.52
N= 1
44.00
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
*
t
*
*
$
*
$
14
N=
15
N=
54
N=
36
N=
61
N=
40
N=
41
.53
17
.59
25
,51
91
.16
64
.20
42
.15
17
.73
H
W
f1
M
a
ISJ
1
-------
a
i
en
SANITARY SEWERS
AVFERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
-------
SANITARY SEWPRS
AVERAGE TOTAL COS! PER FOOT OF PIPE
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE)
en AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
30
REG 01
» 12.11
N- 1
* 28.87
N= 3
* 34.67
N= 15
* 82.59
N= 5
* 45.90
N= 8
* .00
N= 0
$ 107.78
N= 6
* 122,27
N= 6
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
REG 02
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* 37 . 35
N= 80
t 59.97
N= 48
* 82.98
N= 44
* 160.64
N= 12
* 93.17
N= 12
* 94.01
N= 23
4 i.29.14
N= 18
$ 120.11
N<= 20
$ 256.37
N= 2
REG 03
* .00
N= 0
* 10.03
N= 4
* 27.95
N= 76
* 37.39
N= 58
* 40,62
N= 45
* 51.14
N= 34
* 48.57
N<= 1
% 63.46
N= 46
$ 86.46
N= 11
* 57.58
N= 4
* .00
N= 0
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
*
*
t
*
REG 04
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
8.51
N= 4
29,20
N= 26
41.31
N= 25
71.39
N= 14
.00
N= 0
32.14
N58 5
.00
N= 0
158.56
N= 6
.00
N= 0
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
1
REG 05
.00
N= 0
20.82
N= 4
54.38
N= 21
28.66
N= 22
37,17
N» 6
55.75
N=> 3
.00
N= 0
33.55
N= 3
94.53
N= 1
49.48
N= 2
.00
N» 0
REG 06
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t • vO
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
» .00
N" 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
REG 07
* .00
N=« 0
* .00
N- 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N=" 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N* 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
REG 08
* .00
N» 0
$ .00
N= 0
* 25.57
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* 47.89
N= 1
$ .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* ,00
N=» 0
* .00
N<= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
»
t
*
t
*
t
$
$
$
*
*
REO 09
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
16.99
N= 3
.00
N= 0
33.07
N= 2
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N=> 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
REG
* 8
N=
*
N=
* 9
N=
* 15
N=
* 18
N=
*
N=
* 99
N"
* 134
N=
$
N-
*
N=
*
N«
10
.31
4
.00
0
.81
3
.82
3
.87
2
.00
0
.20
5
.27
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
NATIONAL
*
*
*
*
*
t
t
*
*
i
*
9.07
N= 5
22.00
N= 11
34.85
N= 203
42.57
N= 162
54.54
N= 133
76.72
N= 63
96.27
N= 24
75.34
N= 86
112.34
N= 30
116.09
N= 40
256.37
N- 2
H
5
f
M
ho
-------
SANITARY SFJUERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE)
O
I
HI AM
04
06
00
10
12
15
16
161
21
24
30
UNIT COST
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
»
*
7.77
14.20
20.89
25. B2
an . 74
40.90
47.13
32.70
40 . 64
45 . 67
45.12
APPIJRT (t/FT)
*
*
«
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
.85
4.92
6.28
10.07
15.86
25.08
19.96
20.98
22.46
29.70
57.68
NON-CONS <*/FT> TOTAL COST <»/FT>
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
t
*
2
7
6
9
10
29
21
49
40
153
.44
.87
.66
.67
.93
.72
.17
.65
.23
.70
.55
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
9.
22.
34.
42.
54.
76.
96.
75.
112.
116.
256.
07
72
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE)
tiiAH KKG 01 RE:B 02 KFTG o;$ REM 04 REG os REG OA REG o? REG oo REO 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
04
06
OB
10
12
15
O
CO 16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
4 El
$ ,
N=
t 30 .
N=
$ 39.
N=
* 58.
N=
* 63.
N=
* 87.
N=
*
N=
t .
N=
*
N=
* ,
N=
*
N=
t
N=
% ,
N=
$ t
N-
t
N-
00
0
96
11
06
31
50
22
49
20
84
12
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
$
$
*
*
t
t
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
t
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
42.14
N= 54
46.71
N= 19
66.79
N= 33
77.03
N= 1.1
90.02
N= 14
118.70
N= 14
208.46
N= 5
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N=< 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
t
«
*
*
$
t
t
11.23
N= 1
39.80
N= 20
35.93
N= 1.17
46.40
N= 59
41.81
N= 32
79.64
N= 28
.00
N= 0
62.38
N= 21
01.77
N= 16
117.75
N= 13
280.16
N= 3
S00.40
N= 2
506. 33
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
*
*
*
t
$
$
*
*
t
t
$
*
*
t
$
.00
N=> 0
.00
N= 0
18.45
N= 32
22.48
N= 29
33.37
N" 13
38.84
N= 9
.00
N= 0
44.02
N= 15
.00
N= 0
98.71
N= 16
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
*
*
*
*
$
t
*
*
*
t
*
*
«
*
$
17.98
N= 4
17.42
N= 45
29.80
N= 190
34.79
N= 109
48.63
N= 140
46,55
N= 50
,00
N= 0
68,66
N= 42
62,11
N= 9
81,12
N= 20
147.06
N= 3
107.46
N=« 11
136.06
N= 14
117.04
N= 3
139.26
N= 3
*
N=
* 12
N=
* 19
N=
* 26
N=
* 38
N=s
* 27
N=
*
N=
* 53
N=
* 57
N=
* 78
N=
* 77
N-
*
N=
t
N=
t
N=
*
N=
.00
0
.09
14
.73
70
.83
40
.06
56
.25
15
.00
0
.87
32
.51
20
.66
22
.10
11
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
* .00
N» 0
* .00
N= 0
* 17,70
N- 6
* .00
N= 0
* 29.48
N=° 1
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
» 32,56
N=> 1
* .00
N= 0
* 54.95
N=« 1
* .00
N=» 0
* .00
N=» 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=* 0
* 32.38
N= 1
* 22.57
N= 3
* 18,13
N= 1
* ,00
N= 0
* 44.12
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N<= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t , 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 14
N=
* 21
N=
* 29
N=
* 45
N=
* 53
N=
$ 40
N=
»
N=
* 108
N=
* 73
N=
* 7B
N=
* 105
N=
* 113
N=
$
N=
t
N=
* 220
N=
.42
9
.39
12
.56
14
.57
13
,33
6
.81
2
.00
0
.71
7
.14
6
.55
3
.66
1
.33
7
.00
0
.00
0
.65
1
$ .00
N= 0
* 38.06
N= 1
* 42.91
N= 2
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
t
$
*
*
*
*
*
f
15
N=
23
N=
30
N=»
37
N=
48
N=
57
N=
90
N=
68
N=
80
N=
90
N>=
124
N=
148
N=
160
N=
117
N=
159
N=
.21
14
.24
104
.82
519
.81
292
.29
301
.37
128
.02
14
.43
132
.33
56
.05
75
.19
18
.81
20
.76
15
.04
3
.61
4
H
OS
W
a
•
i
o
-------
SANITARY SEUEKS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE)
O
i
vo
01 AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
3 A
4?
48
UNIT COST
*
*
t
t
S
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
$
*
*
12.80
15.04
20.40
22.63
20.10
32.24
40.52
36 . 72
44,99
47.05
74 . US
90 . 93
89.27
79.09
89.53
APPURT ($/FT>
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
1 . 42
3.70
5,54
8.23
10.04
13,53
19.57
17.74
22.22
18.69
30.45
28 . 06
42.43
11.34
33.34
NON-CONS <*/FT) TOTAL COST
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
.97
4.49
4,86
6,94
10.14
11,58
29.92
13.96
13,11
24.30
18.88
29.81
29.05
25.80
36.73
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15.21
23.24
30.82
37. Bl
48.29
57,37
90.02
68.43
00 . 33
90.05
124.19
148.81
160.76
117.04
159.61
<*/FT)
-------
'SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(CAST IRON PIPE)
REG 01 KEG 02 RE6 03 KEG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 KEG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
O
1
O
04 $ . 00
N= 0
06 * .00
N= 0
08 * 31,72
N= 1
10 * 41.26
N= 2
12 » 56.02
N= 1
15 * .00
N= 0
16 * 151.67
N= 3
18 * .00
N= 0
21 * .00
N= 0
24 * . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 32.13
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* 133.44
N= 2
* .00
N= 0
* 224.35
W=3 *"*
* .00
N= 0
* 35.68
N- 3
* 37.04
N= 20
* 63.60
N= 5
* 58 , 00
N= 9
* .00
N= 0
* 36.28
N= 1
* 141.10
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* 032.32
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t 18.25
N= 7
* 31.48
N= 13
* 39.77
N= 5
* .00
N= 0
* 44.74
N* 3
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 44.87
N= 2
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.10
N- 2
.00
N= 0
77.19
N= 5
63,02
N= 7
63,75
N= 4
150.78
N= 3
54,21
N__, ly
~~ e.
83.27
N=> 2
206.25
N= 1
215.95
N=> 2
* 11.13
N= 2
* 25.68
N« 7
* 26.39
N= 14
* 34,40
N— A
* 53.73
N= 22
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N* 0
* 80.86
N* 9
* .00
N= 0
* 139.90
N= 9
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
» .00
N= 0
* ,00
N=» 0
* ,00
N» 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
* .00
N=* 0
*
*
t
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
6.77
N= 1
.00
N= 0
27.97
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N* 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N*> 0
.00
N=» 0
* .00
N= 0
$ 32.94
N=° 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 126.09
N= 1
* ,00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
*
* 41
N=
* 56
N=
* 46
N=
* 98
N=
* 147
N=
*
N-
$
N-
*
N-
$
N=
.00
0
.21
1
.65
1
.52
1
.76
1
.27
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
« 8
N=»
* 30
N=
* 35
N=
* 44
N=
* 56
* 149
N-
* 81
N=
* 93
N=
* 206
N=
» 191
N=
.64
5
.08
12
.51
49
.23
34
,16
44
.90
4
.55
9
.02
14
.25
1
.36
16
fe
£
0
Ijj
o
-------
o
I
SANITARY SF.Wi:R?i
COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
.25
-------
BrtNIIARY SfUFKti
TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF
(REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE)
no
in AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
1A
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
RF::ti 01
» .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* 38,05
N= 4
* 96.77
N= 9
* .00
N= 0
$ 132.09
N= 13
* 150.81
N= 5
* 201.03
N= 16
* .00
N= 0
* 185.02
N= 13
* 238.03
N* 13
* 265.07
N= 2
* 449.96
N= 7
« .00
N= 0
* 498.17
N= 1
t .00
N= 0
*
*
$
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
REG 02
.00
N- 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
65.64
N= 8
160. B2
N= 15
143.18
N= 21
161,66
N= 38
1.37.FJO
N= 18
184.56
N= 77
228.06
N= 102
270.64
N= 21
266,93
N= 21
36 A. 01
N= 8
377,35
N= 43
490.56
N= 10
REO
*
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
* 33
N=
* 40
N=
*
* 125
N=
* .1.64
N=
* 82
N=
* 1.37
N=
t 159
N=
* 95
t 260
N=
* 164
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
0-.1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.02
5
.25
4
.00
0
.05
7
.17
5
.06
31
.70
4
.03
14
.02
12
.86
3
.47
5
.00
0
.00
0
,00
o
REG
$
i
N=
* 26
N=
*
N=
* 20
N=
i 26
N=
t
N=
* 38
N=
$ 36
N=
* 57
N=
t 96
N<=
* 95
N=
t .166
N=
$ 1.92
N=
* 197
* 260
N=
* 265
*
04
.00
0
.00
0
.48
3
.00
0
.88
1
.82
10
.00
0
.05
25
.34
A
.99
4A
.30
4
.02
49
.60
48
.79
25
.66
10
.71
36
.58
12
.00
0
REG
*
N--O
*
*
N=
* 23
N=
$ 72
N=
$ 83
N=
* 1.27
N=
* 71
N=
* 78
N=
* 83
N=
* 1.25
N=
$ 1.07
* 149
N=
* 239
* 252
N=
* 188
N=
* 385
NO
* 299
05
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.11
3
.58
14
.53
S4
.43
1
.86
63
.98
74
.45
93
.92
42
.39
70
.14
59
,16
56
.51
25
.98
15
.10
27
.60
14
*
*
*
*
%
$
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
REG 06
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
42.76
N= 1
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N«= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N=» 0
RF.G 07
* .00
N» 0
* . 00
N=» 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=» 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N<= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
*
4
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
$
*
*
*
*
REG 08
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
17.38
N= 3
21.94
N= 2
29.95
N= A
18.31
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N- 0
.00
N= 0
46.31
N= 3
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
91.63
N= 1
107.07
N= 3
439.10
N= 1
282.98
N= 1
348,82
N=» 5
360.73
N- 10
$
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
t
t
t
*
*
*
*
*
REG 09
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
18.33
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N«= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N=> 0
49.31
N= 1
.00
N= 0
66.05
N= 1
71.15
N= 1
:I08.03
N= 7
254.37
N= 13
233.89
N= 13
235.96
N= 1
387.39
N= 1
307,58
N= 2
REG 10
* 14.85
N« 4
* 17.14
N= 4
* 19.16
N= 4
* 24.12
N= 4
* ,00
N=> 0
i .00
N* 0
$ ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
S .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* 220.63
N» 1
* 253.34
N= 1
* 266.78
N= 1
* .00
N* 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
NATIONAL
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
i
*
$
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
14.85
N= 4
17.14
N- 4
20.59
N= 11
23.30
N= 9
51.14
N=- 30
74.73
N= 78
72.50
N" f
84.89
N= 124
95.48
N= 112
98.99
N= 227
127.11
N- 49
138.78
N= 224
187.01
N= 243
234.60
N= 124
260,40
N= 83
261.56
N= Al
364.50
N<* 89
370.07
N=> 36
1
O
W
-------
/i! t .00 » (517. 21 N= 9 N« 0 N=» 16 N» 0 H« 0 N« 21 N= 2 N- 0 N" 69
78
* .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 378.09 * .00 * .00 * 467.45 * 341.19 * .00 « 438.52
N= 0 N~ 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 0 N« 0 N=> 23 N" 5 N= 0 N- 31
(34
* .00 $12;=
N= 0 N=
.55 * .00 * .00 * 542.39 *
2 N= 0 N= 0 N» 4
.00 * .00 *
0 N= 0
.00 $ .00 * .00 * 779.7B
0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 6
90
$ .00 * .00 * .00 *
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0
.00 * 537.29 * ,00 *
.00 * .00 * .00 $
.00 t 537,29
N= 3 N=< 0 N= 0 N-
W
a
i
* .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * .00 t .00 * 465.56 » .00 * 465.56
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N* 0 N<= 0 N= 0 N* 1 N= 0 N- 1
I
W
O
o
0
rt
H-
g
n>
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE)
O
DT AM
04
06
Of)
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
7?
78
84
90
96
UNIT COST
*
t
*
»
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
$
*
1 3.02
13.02
15.08
13.68
21.35
30.13
59.75
46 . 56
45.52
45.70
63.78
65.53
86.43
1 36 . 00
132.54
151.83
191.60
215.20
239.63
255.20
402.69
263.78
298.51
APPURT <*/FT>
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
•
*
*
.83
1.87
2.68
5.29
21.79
31.06
7.09
24.01
25.86
32.94
38.87
40.49
58 . 53
57,77
71.50
f56 . 23
108.68
90.90
1 03 . 33
109.00
159.24
151.62
87.71
NON-CONS (t/FT) TOTAL COST
*
*
*
$
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
t.
*
*
*
*
.99
2.24
2.82
4.32
7,99
13,54
5.65
14,30
24.09
20.34
24.46
32.74
42.03
40.82
56.35
53.49
64,21
63,96
69.04
73.50
137.84
121. BB
79.33
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
$•
*
*
*
*
*
14.85
17,14
20.59
23.30
51.14
74.73
72.50
84.89
95.48
98,99
127.11
138.78
187.01
234.60
260.40
261.56
364.50
370.06
412,02
438.52
779.78
537,29
465.56
($/FT>
(N=
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(DUCTILE IRON PIPE)
UTAH REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 RUG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * .00 $ 21.30 * 25.98 * .00 * 26.65 * .00 * 20.12 * .00 * 21.82 * 51.32 » 27.62
N= 0 N= 2 N= 2 N= 0 N= 5 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 2 N= 2 N= 15
08 * 49.47 $ 58.93 t 42.46 * 16.56 * 56.78 * 43.66 * 20.44 * 24.34 * 33.24 * 19.28 * 49.63
N= 5 N" 28 N= 23 N= 3 N= 20 N= 2 N=» 1 N= 2 N= 1 N= 1 N* 86
10 t 73.20 t 41.99 * 46.65 4 31.24 * 43.65 9 28,63 * 30.24 * 39.20 * 45.49 * .00 * 46.47
N== 10 N= 4 N= 8 N= 11 N= 12 N= 1 N= 1 N= 2 N= 1 N= 0 N= 50
12 * 78.1.0 * 94.02 * 83.13 * 30.09 * 60.45 * 117.62 * 32,74 $ 38.19 * 60.30 * 49.12 * 66,89
N= 3 N= 9 N= 3 N~ 3 N= 19 N= .1. N= 1 N= 3 N= 1 N= 1 N= 44
15 * .00 $ .00 t 80.07 * .00 * 54.32 * 55.88 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 » 63.43
N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 1 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 5
fo
16 * .00 t 75.20 * 70.91 * 55.16 * 69.16 * .00 * .00 * 46.18 * .00 * .00 * 63.93 ^
N= 0 N-- 6 N= 6 N= 12 N= 6 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 32
O O
—• la * 159.81 $ 156.76 * 101.38 * 68.91 t 98.81 * 67.53 * 48.61. $ 49.60 $ .00 * ,00 * 84.71 M
01 N= 4 N* 1 N= 5 N= 15 N= 8 N= 11 N= 2 N= 2 N= 0 N* 0 N= 48 4rj
21 t .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 56.91 * .00 * .00 * 56.91
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N" 0 N= 0 N* 0 N= 1 N= 0 N=» 6 N= 1
24 t .00 * 104.70 * 87.70 * 1.23.11 * 137.52 * 90.58 $ 61.66 * 68.01 * 29.74 * .00 * 113.83
N= 0 N= 2 N= 2 N= 27 N= 3 N= 1 N= 1 N= 2 N= 1 N= 0 N= 39
30 * 261.34 * .00 * .00 * 131.21 * 170.42 * .00 * .00 * 116.50 t .00 * ,00 * 143.47
N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 14 N= 3 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 19
36 t .00 t .00 * 231.79 * 274.57 t .187.76 * .00 t .00 t ,00 * 114.85 * .00 * 229.86
N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N~ 6 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N<= 2 N= 0 N<= 11
42 * .00 * .00 * 339.58 * 378.94 * .00 t .00 t .00 $ .00 * .00 * .00 » 371.79
N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 9 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N=> 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 11
-------
o
I
SANI'lAfSY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT LIF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(DUCTILE IRON PIPE)
IJ;AM
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
30
36
42
UNIT COST
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
2:1.59
31.15
28.16
39.44
33.71
36.79
45.97
37.04
66.19
97.12
160.5^
268.17
APF'UKT (*/FT)
t
t,
t
$
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
3.17
9.13
7.86
15.20
13.71
12.62
20.79
13.12
29.14
23.71
32.31
46.93
NON-CONS (*/FT) TOTAL
4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2.84
9.34
10.43
12.16
1 3 . 99
14.51
17.95
6.74
18.48
22.63
36.97
56 . 68
*
*
*
$
*
$
*
t
*
t
$
1
27
49
46
66
63
63
84
56
113
143
229
371
COST (*/FT;
.62 (N=
.63
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(OTHER PIPE)
RF.fi 01 RE(5 02 Rl-0 03 REG 04 REG OS REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG J.O NATIONAL
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
* .00
N= 0
* 23,89
N= 1
* ,00
N~ 0
* 36.07
N= 1
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
« .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 185.46
N= 4
* .00
N=> 0
t ?85.54
N= 2
* .00
N= 0
* .00
*
N=
*
N=
* 49
N=
* 79
N=
t.
N=
* 69
N=
t 49
N=
$ 1.08
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
t
N=
t 40:
N=
t
,00
0
.00
0
.24
5
.83
6
.00
0
.27
4
.95
2
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
!.13
1
.00
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
t
N=
* 124
N=
t
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
. 33
3
.00
0
.00
*
*
*
t
$
t
*
$
*
*
*
*
$
t
16.63
N= 1
17,18
N= 8
23.31
N= 43
31.91
N*> 40
41.02
N= 41
50.16
N= 27
.1.01.50
N= 2
62.23
N= 19
63.28
N= 8
B5.84
N= 27
118.4.1
N= 10
142.88
N= 7
174.02
N= 17
198.11
*
N =
*
N=
* 21
N=
*
N=
* 55
N=
*
N=
*
N=
* 34
N=
$
N=
t
N=
$
N=
» 63
N=
* .1.27
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.76
9
.00
0
.99
3
.00
0
.00
0
.95
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.54
1
.46
1
.00
*
*
$
$
t
$
$
*
$
*
*
t
$
t
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
30.79
N= 1
39.18
N= 1
49.22
N= 1
68.88
N=» 1
.00
N= 0
37.39
N=> 1
43.29
N= 1
54.70
N= 1
.00
N= 0
71.99
N* 1
.00
N= 0
.00
*
$
$
$
t
$
t
$
*
*
*
$
$
*
4 . 68
N= 1
.00
N= 0
13.78
N= 2
18.68
N= 2
31 .81
N= 2
40.08
N= 1
.00
N= 0
55,68
N= 1
72.30
N= 1
91.63
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
,00
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
«
N=
*
N=
* 50
N=
t 58
N=
* 67
N=
» 75
N=
$
N=
t
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
,00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.93
1
.96
1
.36
1
.09
1
.00
0
.00
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
«
N=«
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=>
»
N =
$
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
* 10
N=
* 17
N=
* 25
N=
* 37
N=
» 41
N=
* 52
N=
* 75,
N=
* 61,
N=
* 61.
N=
* 96.
N=
* 113.
N=
* 143.
N=
* 183.
N=»
* 190.
.76
?.
.93
9
,05
60
,36
50
.76
47
.74
33
.73
4
,67
23
,17
11
02
3-1
77
11
66
15
57
19
11
H
P
M
t)
V
O
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0
-------
O
oo
4B
54
60
7B
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
« . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* . 00
N~ 0
* .00
N= 0
* 306.61
N- 12
* .00
N= 0
* 314.47
N= 1
* 367. BO
N=" 2
* .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N*> 0
* .00
N« 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
H-- 0
* .00
M= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t 915.96
N» 3
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N=« 0
* .00
N» 0
* 314.47
N= 1
* 367. 8B
N= 2
t 306.61
N= 12
* 915.96
N= 3
1-3
fe
f
M
a
ro
1
O
3
H-
3
C
CD
-------
SANITARY SEWEKS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(OTHER PIPE)
DIAM UNIT COST APPURT <*/FT> NON-CONS <*/FT)
TOTAL COST
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
7FJ
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
t
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
9.67
12.72
16.98
24.80
25,34
25.30
52.48
32.07
26.15
38.77
51 .15
59,34
76.96
69.08
71.58
83,10
180.67
699.32
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
t
$
*
*
*
t
t
*
*
t
*
.78
3 . 29
5,14
8.44
11.17
17.58
13.28
19.28
20 . 37
35 , 55
39 . 23
45.33
78.47
99.00
167.83
209.80
55 . 76
138.49
*
*
*
%
*
*
*
t
t
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
$
t
.30
1.90
2.91
4.10
5.24
9.85
9.96
10.31
14.63
21.69
23.37
38.97
28.12
30.01
75.04
74.96
70.17
78.14
*
*
i
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
t
f
10.76
17.93
25.05
37.36
41.76
52.74
75.73
61.67
61.17
96.02
113.77
143.66
183.57
198,11
314.47
367.88
306.61
915.96
12)
3)
H
1
W
G
?o
1
O
CO
i
g
Kj
-------
SANITARY SEfUERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(DEPTH < 8 FT.>
UTAH REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG OB REG 07 REG 10 NATIONAL
04
06
08
10
12
IS
o
ro
0 16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
*
*
*
t
$
t
*
t
$
*
*
*
$
*
*
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
30.97
N= 3
.00
N= 0
54.18
N= 4
116.94
N= 1
67.65
N= 2
158.99
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
138.26
N= 3
183,24
N* 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
$
*'
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
t
*
.00
N* 0
.00
N= 0
29.07
N= 20
38.10
N= 6
69.36
N= 8
60 . 38
N= 3
65 . 65
N= 3
.1.60.76
N= 4
160.24
N= 5
131.05
N= 2
75.31
N= 2
155.17
N= 3
183.65
N= 4
.00
N= 0
.00
N- 0
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
.00
N= 0
22.06
N= 2
25.68
N= 42
28 . 25
N= 17
34.26
N= 16
46.44
N= 12
.00
N= 0
54.80
N= 11
49.20
N= 3
62.89
N* 4
.00
N= 0
104.49
N= 1
66.30
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
t
t
*
*
*
«
*
$
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
15.44
N= 15
21.86
N= 19
24.18
N= 7
28.82
N= 6
46.80
N= 4
37 . 28
N= 10
31.45
N= 1
67.30
N=» 10
.00
N= 0
.1.01,26
N* 5
325,80
N= 2
364.40
N= 1
176.86
N= 1
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
t
*
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
18.84
N= 22
36.50
N= 16
30,85
N= 6
48.42
N= 3
.00
N= 0
56.53
N= 9
57.25
N= 3
106.49
N= 6
164.81
N« 1
157.60
N« 7
145.93
N* 1
.00
N- 0
.00
N« 0
* .00
N= 0
* 13.98
N=> 4
* 14.47
N= 26
* 18.88
N= 16
* 29.18
N* 18
* 25.17
N= 8
t .00
N= 0
* 44.95
N= 10
* 53.74
N— i *"!
» «
* 78.34
N_ A
^ f
* 70.98
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t
$
t
*
*
*
t
$
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
17.46
N= 1
.00
N<* 0
,00
N= 0
,00
N=» 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
,00
N" 0
.00
N« 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N« 0
.00
N» 0
.00
N* 0
,00
N" 0
t .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* 16.35
N= 1
$ .00
N=" 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
$ ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 16.47
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ 60.94
N= 1
% ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 12.37
N= 1
* 14.66
N= 1
* 34.23
N- 2
* 21.64
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=» 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
*
*
$
*
*
$
*
$
*
$
t
*
*
i
$
12.37
N= 1
16.38
N ~j
™ /
21.76
N= 133
27.09
N= 75
37.28
N= 59
41.67
N= 33
57.72
N= 9
60.80
N= 46
89.96
N= 14
82,27
N= 26
96,60
N= 4
136.54
N= 19
197.96
N_ O
K f
364.40
N= 1
176.86
N- 1
H
i
&y
s
y
*
1
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(DEPTH < 8 FT.>
O
PO
IJIAH
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
UNIT COST
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
10.f53
10.74
12.90
13. AS
19. 84
113.30
33.43
24.14
28.28
35.06
42.91
56.24
77.26
200 . 26
66.97
APHJFiT <4/FT)
*
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
.83
1.82
4.51
6,69
0.50
11.78
10.12
17.40
25,48
23.70
38.05
45 . 134
33.21
41.06
53.63
NON-CONS (4/FT) TOTAL COST (4/FT)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
.99
3.81
4.34
6.74
8.93
1 1 . 50
14.15
19.25
36.19
22.70
14.83
34.46
87.49
43,06
56.25
4
4
4
4
4
4
t
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
'12.37
16.38
21.76
27.09
37. 2S
41.67
57.72
60.80
89.96
82.27
96.60
136.54
197.96
364.40
176.86
-------
ro
HANI TAR Y St-UKKB
AVERAGE. TOTAL COB I PER FOOT OF PII>E
(DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
Ill AM
04
06
08
10
12
IS
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
»
*
$
9
*
t
«
K'fc.B 01
.00
N= 0
33.94
N= 9
43. 6t
N= 54
73.96
N= 37
62.92
N= 33
105.78
N= 17
131.76
N= 6
147.51
N= 17
177.39
N= 4
241.88
N= 5
.00
N= 0
183.41
N= 6
254.61
N= 3
.00
N= 0
445.08
N= 1
*
*
*
t
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
REI3
f
N=
N- '
37.
N=
42.
N=
65.
N=
69.
N=
66,
N=
91.
N=
123,
120.
N=
116.
N=
145.
N=
151.
N=
180.
208.
N=
02
OO
0
OO
0
34
78
OK
31
70
40
58
10
86
21
86
28
10
31
40
41
45
16
13
46
13
54
05
5
01
3
RF«
*
N=
* 30
N=
* 30
$ 37
N=
* 39
N=
t 50
N=
* 66
N=
* 61
N=
* 60
N-
* 86
N=
*
N=
* 1.06
N=
* 72
N=
* 120
N=
03
.00
0
. 26
5
.06
149
.24
86
.48
62
.85
42
.74
3
.24
42
.42
13
.25
32
.00
0
.47
4
.54
4
.00
0
.72
4
REG
*
t
* 18
N=
$ 26
* 30
* 36
N=
* 47
N=
* 43
N=
$ 35
N=
* 76
* 59
N=
* 101
N=
* 187
* 207
N=
* 182
N=
04
.00
0
.00
0
.16
34
.21
66
.50
35
.69
22
.29
8
.49
38
.82
4
.86
47
.35
1
.53
26
.00
21
.31
15
.37
4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
$
*
REG 05
.00
N= 0
27.37
N= 17
33.31
N= 183
35 . 48
N= 120
48.63
N= 92
81.50
N= 57
74.80
N= 1
57.71
N= 59
67 . 87
N= 36
76.27
N= 57
114,60
N= 18
87.46
N= 26
3.20.15
N= 26
.1.84.46
N= 15
.00
N= 0
REG 06
* .00
N* 0
* ts.oi
N= 9
* 20.51
N= 93
* 26.09
N= 60
* 35.82
N= 78
* 37.76
N= 37
* ,00
N= 0
* 54.49
N= 41
* 60.66
N=° 9
* 99.62
N= 23
$ 74.04
N= 4
* 137.20
N= 6
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
REG 07
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 18.72
N=> 3
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N»» 0
* .00
N=» 0
* ,00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N» 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 08
$ .00
N= 0
* 10.53
N= 5
* 17.95
N= 24
* 25,21
N= 4
* 32.51
N= 4
* 52.45
N=° 3
$ .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N=» 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 09
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N« 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N™ 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 10
t 13.15
N= 7
* 17.97
N= 3
* 41.99
N= 19
* 24.95
N= 3
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
$ 106.75
N= 3
* 132.80
N= 2
* .00
N=> 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
NATIONAL
$
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
$
$
13.15
N= 7
24.24
N- 48
30.85
N= 637
36.90
N= 407
45.40
N= 344
61.90
N= 188
75.43
N= 42
67.00
N= 227
87.05
N=» 97
93.45
N= 205
109.78
N= 39
122.27
N= 114
150.61
N= 108
193.62
N= 35
190.12
N= 12
f
fil
-------
54 * .00 * 265.79 * .00 * 236.36 * 126.68 * .00 * ,00 * .00 t .00 * .00 * 207.12
N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 9 N= 4 N= 0 N" 0 N«= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 14
60 * .00 * 343.43 * .00 * 291.84 * 230.80 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 323.81
N= 0 N= 16 N«= 0 N= 4 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N«= 22
66 * .00 * .00 t .00 * ,00 * 287.48 * ,00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * 287.48
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N=» 0 N= 0 N= 0 N" 0 N" 0 N= 1
72 t .00 t 434<20 * 2/3.27 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 369.83
N= ' 0 N= 3 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N« 0 N- 0 N* 0 N= 0 N* 0 N" 5
5
£
a
i
O
o
rf
H-
O
C
(D
-------
SrtNM'rtRY SEWERS
COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
o
1
IU AM
04
OA
OH
.10
]2
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
UNIT r.osr
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
9.
.1.5.
17.
1 9..
22.
25,
36.
31.
39,
41 .
54.
54.
71.
126.
77.
111.
174.
121.
184.
03
68
83
.10
57
90
20
07
OA
58
29
89
55
41
14
08
86
06
13
APPURT <*/FT)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
t
*
*
*
$
*
t
*
*
2
4
7
9
12
21
17
19
23
25
32
2tt
35
37
58
50
85
110
107
,32
.90
.41
.72
,58
.96
.39
.35
.97
.96
.11
.86
.58
.41
.21
.96
.01
.76
.69
NON-CONS (*/FT
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
J
*
*
*
1.79
3.64
5.59
8.08
10.23
13.95
21.83
16.57
24,01
25 . 90
23.36
30.51
43.47
29.70
54,76
45.08
63.94
55,64
78.00
> TOTAL COST
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
»
13.15
24.24
30.85
36.90
45.40
61.90
75.43
67.00
87.05
93.45
109.78
122.27
150.61
193.62
190.12
207.12
323.81
287.48
369 , 83
<*/FT>
5)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(BERTH > 15 FT.)
a
i
ro
tn
HI AM REG 01
06 * .00
N= 0
08 * 52.52
N= 22
10 * 114.99
N= 12
12 * 86.79
N= 10
15 $ 104.97
N= 7
16 t 84.41
N= 2
18 * .00
N=» 0
21 * 120.99
N= 2
24 * 250.81
N=> 5
27 * .00
N= 0
30 * 215.13
N= 4
36 * 226.64
N= 5
42 * .00
N= 0
48 * 514.39
N= 4
54 * .00
N= 0
REG 02
* .00
N= 0
* 53.36
N= 48
* 60.91
N= 18
* 86 . 90
N= 28
* 101.12
N= 7
* 77.92
N= 13
* 87.85
N- 13
* 191.02
N= 10
* 119.86
N= 21
* 13S.95
N= 4
t 184.10
N=- 30
* .176.37
N= 51
* 290.95
N= 16
* 257.43
N= 14
* 284.79
N= 2
REG
* 62
N=
* 39
N=
* 57
N=
* 52
N=
i 70
N=
* 81
N=
* 73
N=
* 108
N=
* 113
N=
*
N=
* 121
N=
* 100
N=
$
N=
t
N=
*
N=
03
.45
2
,28
48
,29
29
.94
14
.21
15
.63
2
.46
20
.27
12
.96
15
.00
0
.14
6
1.23
5
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG 04
* .00
N= 0
* 27.88
N= 5
» 32.02
N= 17
* 56.02
N= 13
* 67.56
N= 13
* 76,88
N= 3
* 6S.02
N= 12
* 43,30
N= 1
* 112.39
N= 37
* 64.00
N= 2
* 95 . 59
N= 31
* 145.10
N* 28
* 264.24
N= 18
* 214.04
N= 5
* 279.49
N= 27
REG 05
* 24.80
N= 2
* 46.72
N= 108
$ 43.59
N= 83
* 53,09
N= 89
$ 62.75
N= 40
$ .00
N= 0
* 73,29
N= 43
* 84,60
N= 36
* 86.93
N= 54
* .1.25.23
N= 32
* 116.15
N= 44
$ 144.73
N= 29
* 207.15
N= 19
* .00
N= 0
* 349.90
N= 1
REG 06
* 13.88
N= 1
* 32.93
N= 27
* 41.74
N= 14
* 58.70
N= 19
* 52.51
N= 3
* ,00
N= 0
* 69.74
N= 24
* 56 . 05
N= 8
* 96.45
N= 10
* 80.16
N= 6
* 140.30
N= 4
$ ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 07
* ,00
N=» 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* ,00
N=» 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N" 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N=» 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
REG 08
* 13.99
N= 1
* 21,19
N= 13
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 09
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
i .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N» 0
* .00
N= O
* .00
N- 0
REG 10
* .00
N= 0
* 53.75
N= 6
t ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 112.84
N= 1
* 137.20
N_ 4
W 1
* .00
N- 0
» .00
N= 0
» ,00
N= 0
* .00
N" 0
* .00
N» 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
,
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
»
*
*
NATIONAL
33.73
N" 6
44.31
N= 277
51.36
N= 173
61.35
N= 173
71.08
N= 85
80.40
N« 21
73.93
N= 113
101.29
N= 69
107.73
N= 142
117.55
N= 44
132.32
N= 119
160.08
N« 118
254.25
N= 53
292,69
N- 23
282.19
N= 30
i
H
O
w
1
O
-------
o
ro
60
66
72
* ,00 * 374.98
N= 0 N= 23
$ .00 * 436.02
N= 0 N= 7
t .00 * 487.13
N= 0 N= 16
* .00 * 2(34.95 * 283.54 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00
N= 0 N= 20 N= 16 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0
* .00 * .00 $ 294.03 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00
N= 0 N- 0 N= 5 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0
* 2/8.82 t ,00 $ .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 $ .00 * .00
N= 7 N=» 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0
$ 319.66
N= 59
* 377.66
N= 12
* 423.73
N= 23
TABLE D.3-C (Continued;
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(DEPTH > 15 FT.)
O
I
ro
I) I AM
06
08
10
12
IP
16
IB
21
?A
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
64
72
UNIT COST
$
$
*
t
*
t
*
*
*
$
*
*
$
t
»
»
1
t
2S.7S
30 . 1 1.
32.77
39.15
41.90
48. A3
45.12
50. S3
54.32
64 . 09
69.60
87.99
164.42
140.02
173.2:1
190.93
212.54
2213.68
APPURT <*/TT>
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1 . 07
8 . 77
10.39
13.10
10.54
12.09
14.58
24,93
30. B 1
38.29
28.93
35 . 40
45.24
78. «0
52.50
68.14
97 . 35
113.44
NON-CONS ($/FT> TOTAL COST
*
$
*
»
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
6
5
B
9
10
19
14
25
22
15
33
36
44
73
56
60
67
81
.89
.42
.18
.08
.63
.68
.22
.81
.68
.16
.78
.67
.59
.85
.47
.58
.77
.60
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
i
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
33.73
44.31
51.35
61. .35
71.08
80.40
73.93
101.29
107.73
117.55
132.31
160.08
234.25
292.69
282.19
319.66
377.66
423.73
(*/FT>
(N=
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS)
O
CO
HI AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
1.6
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
REG
* 12
N=
* 29
N=
* 42
N=
* 60
N=
* 63
N=
* 106
N=
* 112
N=
* 136
N=
* 158
N=
* 203
N=
*
N=
* 188
N=
* 230
N=
* 265
N=
* 449
N=
*
N=
* 498
N=
*
N=
01
.11
t
.33
19
.89
61
.67
22
.39
45
,48
23
.56
11
.32
22
.59
6
.79
15
.00
0
.95
14
.72
15
.07
2
,96
7
.00
0
.17
1
.00
0
*
$
*
*
*
$
$
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
REG 02
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
51.62
N= 73
60,95
N= 18
83 . 98
N= 53
1 1 7 . 96
N== 19
73.18
N= 26
1 36 , 39
N= 27
142,83
N= 14
175.66
N= 36
214.35
N= 3
303.08
N= 27
433.49
N= 27
158.22
N= 1
344.38
N= 4
418.54
N= 5
526.70
N= 4
615.94
N= 3
REG
*
N=
* 35
N==
* 35
N=
* 46
N=
* 37
N=>
* 71
N=
* 48
N=
* 64
N=
* 97
N=
* 125
N=
* 219
N=
* 201
N=
* 513
N=
* 260
N=
* 164
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=*
03
.00
0
.64
19
.95
111
.58
69
.88
30
.09
41
.57
1
.00
62
.10
21
.06
18
.95
6
.70
16
.54
5
.86
3
.47
5
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
t
*
*
t
*
*
t
*
$
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
t
NEC) 04
4.51
N=» 1
.00
N= 0
20.74
N= 9
27.23
N= 54
37.24
N= 35
54 . 23
N= 24
57.61
N= 9
53.80
N= 26
.00
N= 0
109.90
N'= 45
96.30
N= 4
90.45
N= 52
166.60
N= 48
222.61
N= 12
.00
N= 0
268.71
N= 36
286.09
N= 24
.00
N= 0
REG 05
* 16.69
N* 10
* 31.47
N=> 76
* 43.27
N= 191
* 36.24
N= 135
* 50.22
N= 156
* 68.31
N= 104
* 88.13
N= 5
* 100.31
N= 101
* 76.02
N= 47
* 85.35
N=» 103
* 125,41
N=« 62
* 116.35
N= 86
* 160.58
N= 85
* 273.74
N= 49
* 269.66
N= 43
* 221,33
N= 19
* 458,513
N= 36
* 338.99
N= 21
REG
* 14
N=
* 14
N=
* 25
N=
* 28
N=
* 44
N=
* 43
N=
*
N=
* 68
N=
*
N=
* 171
N=
*
N"=
* 123
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
t
N=>
*
N=
*
N=
06
.43
17
.24
11
.35
72
.35
52
,30
69
,81
25
.00
0
,99
34
,00
0
.33
5
,00
0
.46
8
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG 07
* ,00
N» 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
* 44,03
N= 2
* ,00
N* 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=* 0
* .00
N* 0
> .00
N= 0
> .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N=» 0
* . 00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
REG 08
* .00
N= 0
* 32 . 38
N= 1
* 22.57
N= 3
* 18.13
N= 1
* ,00
N= 0
$ ,00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N=* 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* 519.96
W— 1
* 282,98
N= 1
* 326.62
N= 6
* 360.73
N= 10
t
*
*
t
*
$
*
$
$
$
$
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
REG 09
11.39
N= 19
17.76
N= 22
25 . 38
N= 16
42.75
N= 12
54.77
N= 4
34.97
N= 2
.00
N= 0
106.31
N= 7
64.12
N= 7
59.27
N= 4
66.71
N= 2
104.39
N= 9
109.55
N= 9
245.58
N= 14
232.94
N= 14
235.96
N= 1
289.57
N= 2
307.58
REG
* 16
N=
* 29
N=
* 33
N=»
* 46
N=
* 58
N=
* 137
N=
i
N=
* 196
N=
*
N=
* 326
N-
$
N=
* 444
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N-
$
N=
10
.25
1
.22
2
.90
6
.52
1
.84
2
.06
1
.00
0
.33
1
.00
0
.03
1
.00
0
.67
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
o
NATIONAL
*
*
t
t
$
*
*
*
*
i
$
*
*
$
*
*
*
$
13.50
N=> 49
28.43
N" !l50
39.35
N= 542
39.02
N= 364
53.47
N= 394
72.44
N= 239
79.78
N= 52
90.62
N= 282
94.86
N= 95
•118.01
N=» 227
133.21
N- 77
146.18
N= 213
213.57
N= 189
259.18
N= 81
283.28
N= 75
265.97
N= 62
390.67
N= 73
366 . 36
N= 36
H
s
f
-------
o
ro
vo
72
7Q
84
90
96
$
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
.. 00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
* 890
N=
*
N=
*.12S4
N=
*
N=
*
N=
.26
?.
.00
0
.55
2
.00
0
.00
0
* 277
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
.59
9
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
i 378
N=
* 393
N=
* 528
N=
* 620
N=
* 863
N=
.78
A
.59
4
.75
11
,27
4
,04
2
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
\ .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* . 00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 460
N=
* 519
N=
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
.02
22
.20
26
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
* 319
N=
* 341
N=
* 340
N=
t
N=
t 465
N=
.46
2
.19
5
.54
1
.00
0
.56
1
*
NX*
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
*
*
*
*
*
422.21
N= 41
479,42
N«= 35
618.99
N= 14
620.27
N= 4
730.55
N= 3
s
3
(D
-------
SAN.) IARY
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS)
GO
O
ft I AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
78
B4
90
96
UNIT COST
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
*
4
4
4
4
4
4
1 1 . 76
16.57
23.90
23,92
29 . 20
36.91
44.22
44.22
43.73
55.10
68.43
6B . 78
89 . 65
119,70
151.66
149. 51
183.10
232.67
231.03
294.82
437,68
372,49
563.03
APfMJKT (4/FT)
4
$
4
4
*
4
4
*
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
%
4
.*
4
4
4
4
. 82
7.49
9.67
9.37
14.92
23 . 83
10.86
27.73
25,31
36.87
41.36
40.07
72 . 83
89.73
74,01
62.44
140.28
76.56
99.18
110.24
90.25
1 26 . 74
63.43
NON-CONS (4/FT) TOTAL COST
*
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
*
4
4
*
4
4
4
4
4
4
t
4
4
4
5
5
9
11
16
18
25
26
23
37
51
49
56
54
67
57
71
74
91
121
104
.91
.35
.77
.72
.34
.69
.69
,65
.81
.03
.41
.32
.07
.74
,79
.01
.28
.12
.99
.34
.05
.03
.08
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
13.50
28.43
39.35
39,02
53.47
72.44
79.78
90.61
94.86
118.01
133.21
146.18
213.57
259.18
283.28
265.97
390.67
366.36
422.21
479.42
618.99
620.27
730,55
(4/FT)
(N=
(N=
(N=
(N=
-------
a
CO
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(NOT STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA)
II I AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
REG 01
f 15.51
N= 1
* 25.72
N= 2
* 48.14
N= 26
t 95.48
N= 32
* 55.69
N= 11
* 75.17
N= 6
* 83.38
N= 1
* 114.68
N= 3
% ,00
N= 0
* 159.65
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* 145.34
N= 3
» .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 02
* . 00
N= 0
* 21.30
N== 2
* 37.. 1.3
N= 89
* 50.81
N= 53
* 67 . 1 3
N= 34
* 133.41
N= 4
* 95,70
N= 16
* 103.16
N= 29
$ 141.49
N= 32
* 112.78
N= 37
* 106.74
N= 23
» 132.31
N= 58
» 151.52
N= BB
* 276.26
N= 20
* 246.71
N= 17
REG 03
* 10.72
N= 24
* 21.82
N= 39
* 31.04
N= 205
* 42.30
N= 102
* 46.08
N= 83
* 58,16
N= 39
* 65.67
N= 8
* 86,11
N= 27
» 79 . 94
N= 16
* 98.54
N= 41
* 80.97
N= 2
« .00
N= 0
* 1.1.4.56
N= 14
* 339.58
N= 2
* .00
N= 0
$
*
*
*
*
*
J
*
*
*
t
t
*
*
$
REG 04
.00
N= 0
9.10
N= 2
19.55
N= 58
24 . 86
N= 56
31.78
N= 22
32.63
N= 18
46.28
N= 6
41.38
N= 34
36.34
N= 6
69. 813
N= 53
.00
N= 0
1 54 , 45
N= 14
274.57
N= 6
252.6?
N= 22
197.66
N= 10
*
*
$
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
t
*
*
*
REG 05
14.21
N= 12
17.38
N= 79
35.45
N= 285
41.44
N= 196
50.64
N= 164
55 . 6 1
N= 80
74.93
N= 8
69.75
N= 83
84.20
N= 49
90,51
N= 62
89.04
N= 8
117.10
N= 39
191.73
N= 16
286.09
N= 15
236.20
N= 1
REG
* 7
N=>
* 17
N=
* 20
N=
t 28
N=
* 38
N=
* 30
N=
*
N=
* 53
N=
* 57
N=
* 91
N=
* 77
N=
* 153
N=
* 127
N=
*
N=
*
N=
06
.83
7
.84
28
.76
117
.21
51
.71
71
.92
28
.00
0
.95
55
.51
20
.49
37
.10
11
.43
3
.46
1
.00
0
.00
0
*
$
$
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
REG 07
5.52
N= 1
16,41
N= 3
18.44
N= 9
26.73
N= 3
31.17
N= 4
68.88
N= 1
.00
N= 0
39.55
N= 2
43.29
N= 1
57.10
N= 3
.00
N= 0
71,99
N» 1
.00
N= 0
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
REG 08
6.87
N» 5
11.05
N= 8
18.77
N= 54
24.66
N= 13
32 . 07
N= 19
38.13
N= 11
46.18
N= 2
47,78
N= 6
58.82
N«= 3
60.41
N= 8
.00
N= 0
105,52
N= 3
91.63
N= 1
107.07
N= 3
.00
N= 0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
REG 09
11.39
N= 3'
21.36
N= 6
29.03
N=> 13
38.05
N= 8
45.47
N= 14
55.33
N= 8
37.25
N= 1
69.33
N= 6
65.82
N= 6
134.53
N= 6
98.37
N= 10
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= O
.00
N= 0
REG 10
* 12.08
N<= 15
* 30.62
N= 13
* 39.99
N= 43
* 22.67
N= 10
* 60.38
N= 10
* 110.02
N= 4
* 102,71
N= 7
* 112.27
N= 6
* .00
N= 0
* 133.56
N= 8
$ .00
N= 0
* 237.77
N= 4
* 220.63
N= 1
» 253.34
N= 1
* 266.70
N= 1
NATIONAL
t 11.08
N= 68
* 19.23
N= 182
* 30.99
N= 899
$ 41.88
N= 524
i 47.33
N= 432
* 52.89
N» 199
* 79.30
N= 49
* 69.07
N* 251
* 89.59
N= 133
$ 92.20
N= 256
* 95.57
N=» 54
* 133.11
N= 125
» 158.21
N» 127
» 264.15
N= 63
* 231.99
N" 29
M
O
-------
O
oo
PO
60
66
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
t
*
*
$
278.
N«
362.
N=
436.
N=
470.
N=
46
3
04
39
82
7
77
19
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N-«
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
*
*
*
*
117
N=
124
N=
N=
166
N==
.62
1
.99
1
.00
0
.76
3
*
$
$
$
N=
N=
N=
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
*
N-
*
N=
$
N<=
*
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
*
*
$
«
N=
N=
H"
N~
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
$
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N~
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
*
N=
t
N=
*
N»
t
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
t
*
t
•t
230
N=
356
N=
436
N-
436
N-
.25
4
.11
40
.82
7
.25
22
M
O
Ui
n
o
B
rt
H-
3
ft)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
$
t
$
$
*
t
%
$
$
*
*
*
$
t
*
*
$
*
*
1 . 62
2.97
5.70
8.99
10,20
13.43
14.40
10.15
23.03
23.71
31.19
32.36
36.07
43,09
59.43
59.17
89.66
110.72
117.26
NON-CONS <*/FT> TOTAL COST
*
%
t
*
t
*
$
*
$
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
1
3
5
8
9
11
21
16
22
20
20
28
25
37
43
43
63
78
Q4
.10
.41
.88
.50
.21
.28
.20
.35
.21
,87
,14
.13
.82
.58
.26
.53
.54
.20
.51
*
*
*
t
*
$
*
*
4
«
t
«
t
t
*
$
*
»
«
11.08
17.23
30.99
41,88
47.33
52.89
79.30
69.07
89.59
92.20
95.57
133.11
158.21
264.15
231.99
238.25
356.11
436.82
436.25
<*/FT)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
-------
SANITARY SEUERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
* 7.34
* 5.71
* 3.37
* 5.27
TOTAL COST (*/FT>
$ 25.14 (No 7)
* 24.91
* 27.75 (N=« 2)
CO
tn
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
0 N= 7 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 0 N= 0 N= 11
N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 8 N= 1 N= 4 N= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 20
t-1
01
I
W
-------
o
00
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
NON-CONS <*/FD TOTAL COST <*/FT>
06
08
10
12
15
•I
*
*
*
•1
7.09
10.33
15.81
18.58
17.57
t
$
$
t
*
2.69
23.01.
15.42
8. 28
9.94
*
$
*
*
t
1.
.to.
e.
8.
9.
84
06
11
29
16
*
*
4
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
CPVC PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
HI AM REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 RED 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 13.99 * .00 * .00 * 13.99
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N» 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1
08 * .00 t .00 * 30,02 * .00 * 116.09 * .00 t .00 * 21.67 t .00 * .00 * 70.02
N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N- 0 N= 11 N= 0 N= 0 N= 8 N== 0 N= 0 N= 22
10 * .00 * .00 * CI6.41 * 29.60 * 42.86 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 3B.12
N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 9 N= 6 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 16
12 * .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * 49.23 * 47.11 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 4S.17 H
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4 N-- 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 8 §5
5
15 * .00 t .00 S .00 t .00 * 60.05 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 60.05
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 H= 0 N=> 0 N= 1. O
T
n
-------
a
CO
VO
SANITARY SFUER8
SE nosi H-K- HIOT OK P/-PE (NATIONAL)
(PVC PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
HAM UNIT COST
06
08
10
12
15
*
*
*
*
*
9. A3
2A.9A
27. 3A
31.12
34.21
APPURT (*/FT>
*
*
*
*
*
2.. 12
32.15
7.22
9,76
16,71
NON-CONS <$/FT)
*
*
*
*
*
2.02
10.90
3.53
7.27
9.12
TOTAL COST (*/'FI)
* 13.99 (N=- 1>
« 70.02 (N» 22)
* 38.12 (N« J.A)
i 48.17
-------
4*
0
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL HOST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE - DEP1H < 8 FT.)
UIAM REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 09 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
OB
10
12
15
18
21
24
4 .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
*
$
*
4
4
«
4
27.47
N= 1 2
39.34
N= 4
69.130
N= 2
72.19
N= 2
,1. 22.4 2
N= 2
122.68
N= 2
162.27
4
$
4
4
4
4
4
22
N=
25
N=
35
N=
38
N=
52
N=
70
N=
.56
11
.51
8
.20
9
.63
5
.54
6
.96
1
.00
4
4
4
4
4
4
$
7
N=
21
N=
25
N=
N=
29
N=
N=
.14
1
,53
3
.64
2
.00
0
.29
1
.00
0
.00
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
14.53
N= 2
.00
N= 0
.00
N~ 0
.00
N= 0
29.73
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
4
N=
4
,N=
4
N=
*
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=>
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
23.62
N= 26
20.40
N= 15
39.06
N= 13
48.22
N= 7
61.91
N= 10
105.44
N= 3
162.27
td
f
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COS! PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
O
I
HAM
08
10
12
15
1.8
21
24
UNIT
t
*
*
«
t
t
*
COST
13
14
18
20
21
20
27
.45
.26
.07
.42
.85
.89
.07
APPURT
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
(*/FT)
5
7
11
16
18
23
36
.40
.05
.82
.09
.89
.90
.91
NON-CONS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4,
7.
9.
11.
21.
60.
98.
(*/FT)
76
08
16
69
16
64
27
T
*
$
$
*
*
$
*
TOTAL COST <*/FT)
23.61 (N= 26)
28.40
162.27
-------
SANITARY SEuiiiRfi
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
til AM REG 01 KEG 02 KEG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * 34.6-1 * .00 * .00 t .00 * 21.15 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * ,00 * .00 * 27,90
N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
08 * 2B.68 * ,'54.16 * 27.07 * 8,97 * 20.81 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * ,00 * .00 * 28.05
N= 8 N= 33 N= 42 N= 3 N= 15 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 101
10 * 84.74 * 39.30 * 31.05 * 27,08 * 26.47 * .00 * .00 t .00 * .00 $ ,00 * 33.86
N= 4 N= 18 N= 32 N= 16 N= 14 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 84
12 * 45,90 t 62.49 * 38.89 * 33.85 $ 35.91 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * ,00 $ .00 * 44,13 H
N= 8 N= 18 N= 30 N= 15 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 75 [g
f<
._. 15 t .00 * 86.01 * 44,14 * 53.83 * 48.37 t ,00 * .00 * ,00 t .00 * .00 * 52,54 W
I N= 0 N= 5 N= 20 N- 4 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 31 O
•t*
1X3 16 * 111.85 * 43.66 * 48,57 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 106.75 * 72.14 T
N= 3 N= 7 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 14 M
18 * 122.27 * 93.77 * 61,15 * 32.86 * 35.46 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 132.80 * 76,?4
N= 6 N= 13 N= 24 N= 4 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 51
21 * .00 $ 119.01 * 75.22 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * .00 t ,00 * .00 $ .00 * 108,07
N= 0 N= 12 N= <1 N<= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 16
24 * .00 * 109.93 t 57.513 * .00 * 49.48 * ,00 * .00 * .00 t ,00 * .00 * 97.23
N= 0 N= 20 N= 4 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 26
30 * .00 * 256.37 * .00 t .00 * .00 $ .00 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 256,37
N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 'N= 0 N= 2
-------
CD
SAHIIARY SEWURS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
CHAM
OA
08
10
12
15
16
1(3
21
24
30
UNIT COST
*
$
*
(
*
4
$
*
*
$
16.B3
18.1.4
19.23
22.09
23.60
33.44
31.02
37.20
35.95
45.12
APPIIRT <$/FT)
*
«
$
$
$
*
t
*
$
t
7.81
5 . S?
(3 . 52
12.49
16.03
13.40
22.62
22.89
22.47
57.68
NON-CONS <*/FT) TOTAL COST (*/FT)
*
$
$
t
$
$
t
t
*
$
3.24
4.31
6.10
9 . 34
10.90
25.21
22.59
47.97
38.80
153.55
$
*
$
*
*
$
$
$
*
*
27.90
28.05
33.86
44.13
52.54
72.14
76.24
1 08 . 07
97.23
256.37
w
en
i
L-?*
-------
I
BANJ TAKY SEWERS
AVERAGE' TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
DIAM REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 REG 04 KEG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
08
10
12
15
16
IB
21
24
$
*
$
*
t
*
t
*
41
N=
N=
N=
N=
84
N=
N=
N=
.08
5
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.41
1
.00
0
,00
0
.00
t
*
$
*
*
$
*
$
37
N=
60
N=
87
N=
105
N=
68
N=
87
N=
162
N=
i. 43
.59
25
.94
17
.13
18
.42
4
.54
3
.29
a
.74
4
.14
*
*
*
t
*
$
*
*
35
N=
56
N=
57
N=
73
N=
N=
71
N=
96
N-~
,83
16
.31
15
.40
6
,66
9
.00
0
.01
16
.53
6
.00
*
*
*
*
$
$
$
*
N=
37
N=
59
N=
78
N=
N=
N=
N=
158
.00
0
.32
7
.22
8
,42
10
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.56
t
*
*
*
$
$
*
*
44
N=
31
N=
39
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
.73
2
.90
7
.71
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
t
N=
$
N=
*
N*
$
N=
$
N=
t
N=
$
N=
$
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
*
N=
t
N=
$
N=
*
N=
i
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
t
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
t
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
*
t
t
*
$
«
*
*
N=
N=
N=
N=
112
N=
137
N=
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.84
1
.20
1
,00
0
.00
$
$
*
*
$
$
*
*
37,66
N= 48
51.42
N= 46
72 . 53
N= 34
81.25
N= 23
81.21
N= 6
78,87
N= 25
123.01
N= 10
150.26
£
r«
P
o>
^
-------
o
I
SANITARY SEDERS
AVEFtAGE! COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
PIAM
08
10
12
15
16
:IR
21
24
UNIT COST
t
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
27.22
34.31
40.46
SO. 96
43.71
40.46
53. A3
66 , 55
APPURT (*/FT)
*
$
*
t
t
t
*
*
5.
9,
18.
19.
11.
18,
20.
43.
48
63
55
5(3
80
47
41
62
NON-CONS (*/FT) TOTAL COST
t
$
$
*
*
*
$
*
4
7
13
10
25
19
4 III
40
.94
.47
.52
,70
.69
.93
.95
.09
* 37.66
* 51.42
* 72.53
t 81,25
* 81.21
* 78.87
* 123.01
* 150.26
<*/FT)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AUERAHE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
IJiIAH REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 RE6 O4 REG 03 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 RER 10 NATIONAL
O
4>
CTi
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.00
N= 0
14.97
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
* 37.26
NK "•
™ »J
* 46.03
N= 1
i 76.01
N- 4
« 112.03
N__ M
= ,£,
* 70.02
N=> i
* 167.05
N— *3>
*"* £,
% .00
N= 0
« .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 30 . 23
N= 1
* 27. S3
N= 13
* 28.10
N= 2
» 28.00
N= 3
* 53.77
N= 4
* ,00
N= 0
* 39.88
N= 2
* 33.25
N= 1
* 34.65
N_ t
.H JJ
* .00
N= 0
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.00
N= O
13.91
N= 7
21.56
N= 7
21.02
N= 1
36.93
N= 2
.00
N= 0
36.91
N» 2
.00
N= 0
107.64
N= 2
.00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 20.95
N= 9
* 27.21
N= 5
* 33.96
N= 2
* 39.12
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* 30.55
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 11.17
N89 3
* 13.26
N» 11
* 18.62
N- 8
* 25.89
N= 8
* 20.92
N= 3
* .00
N= 0
* 45.87
N__ f*
^ &
» 53.74
N= 2
* 48.81
N™ 1
* 70.98
N- 1
* .00
N= 0
* 17.46
N- 1
* .00
N<= 0
* .00
N* 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
» .00
Nr*t A
R U
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N" 0
» .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N— v
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N* 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N" 0
* .00
N" 0
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N* 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* IS.
N=
* 21.
N=
* 23.
N=
* 38.
N=
* 51.
N=
* 70.
N=
» 62.
N=
* 46.
N=
» 74.
N=>
» 70.
N=
94
4
46
47
40
23
01
18
24
12
02
1
63
12
91
3
69
4
98
1
g
f
W
O
*
O"*
O
-------
a
i
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE - DEPTH < B FT.)
IiIAM
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
2t
24
27
UNIT COST
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
8.R5
13.90
1 0 . VII
10.10
22 . 36
29.04
24.47
25.43
29.52
34.73
APPIIRT <*/FT)
*
$
*
*
$
*
*
$
*
$
1.7.1
4.77
6.14
8.63
15.49
11.70
21.87
14.26
9.08
23.09
NON-CONS <$/rr> TOTAL COST
$
*
$
*
»
*
*
$
*
t
5.
3.
6.
11.
13.
29.
16,
7.
36.
13.
36
77
27
27
38
19
20
22
08
15
$
*
*
*
»
*
$
$
t
$
15. V4
21.46
23.40
38.01
51.24
70.02
62.63
46.91
74.69
70.98
(t/FT)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
DIAM REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 REG 01 REG 05 REG 06 KEG 07 REI3 Of) REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * 33.73 t .00 * 34.35 * .00 $ 19.02 * 14.16 $ .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 $ 25.23
N= 7 N= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 3 N= 7 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 21
08 * 39.55 * 42.39 $ 32.89 * 17.Ml * 27.49 * 19.80 * 18.72 $ .00 * .00 * .00 * 29.51
N= 19 N= 36 N- 50 N= 20 N= 78 N= 41 N= 3 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 247
10 * 51.90 * 61.46 * 41.30 $ 23.06 * 33.11 * 26.09 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 37.48
N= 15 N= 17 N= 32 N= 21 N= 44 N= 22 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 151
12 * 62.70 * 78.56 * 33.64 * 30.00 * 41.75 * 34.70 * .00 t .00 $ .00 $ .00 * 46.33
N=" 12 N= 23 N= 13 N= 9 N- S3 N= 33 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 143
15 * 05.47 * 1.17,02 * 65.63 * 39.30 * 43.55 * 26.46 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * 58.40
f N= 6 N= 9 N= 10 N= 7 N= 23 N= 9 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 64 H
** E£
00 16 * .00 $ 89.80 * .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 $ .00 * .00 * 89.80 F1
N= 0 N= 8 N= 0 N- 0 N= 0 N- 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 8 M
O
18 * ,00 * 159.60 * 60.70 * 44.59 * 56.81 * S3.54 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * .00 * 73.39 ^
N= 0 N= 13 N- .1.2 N= 12 N= 16 N= 18 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 71 I
FS
21 * .00 * 192.26 * 57.82 * ,00 * 53.07 * 60,66 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * 72.82
N" 0 N= 2 N= 6 N= 0 N=* 2 N= 9 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 19
24 * .00 * ,00 * 99.02 * 94.90 * 70.86 * 82.33 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 87.19
N= 0 N= 0 N= 7 N= 11 N= 7 N= 11 N<= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 36
27 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 74.04 * ,00 $ .00 * ,00 $ .00 * 74.04
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N<= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
30 * .00 * .00 * .00 t ,00 * 71.51 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * ,00 * 71.51
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2
36 t .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 94.44 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 $ 94.44
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1
-------
SANT'VAUV SFWF.RS
f:RAi:if: COST PUR roor OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
PI AM
06
08
10
.1.2
15
16
IB
21
24
27
30
36
UNIT COST
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
14,27
18.62
19.42
23.08
26,68
33.89
31 .75
36.86
40.63
37.80
34 . 87
41-67
APPURT (*/TT>
t
$
$
*
*
4
*
*
*
$
*
*
5.09
6.00
9.92
12.43
18.51
25,42
24,3(3
24.10
19.21
23.09
21.2.8
30.64
NON-
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1
*
*
-CONS <*/FT) TOTAL COST
5.85
4.88
8.14
10,01
13.20
30.48
17.26
11.84
27.33
13.15
15.35
22 . 1 1
$
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
25.23
29,51
37.48
46.33
58,40
89.80
73,39
72.82
87.19
74.04
71.51
94.44
(*/FT)
(N=
(N=
(N=
(N=
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL. COST PER TOOT OF PIPE
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
DtAM RfclG 01 REG 02 RE(3 03 REG O4 REG 05 RUB 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * .00 $ .00 4 62,45 4 .00 t .00 * 13.89 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 46.26
N= 0 N- 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3
OB * 44.73 * SB.12 4 43.03 * 27.88 * 34.53 * 17.93 t .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * 38.99
N= 8 N= 15 N- 23 N= 5 N= 50 N= 7 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 108
10 * 76.35 * 60.38 * 58.15 * 16.71 * 40.83 * 35.65 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 47.69
N= 6 N= 1 N= 9 N-~ 1 N= 29 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= O N= 50
12 t 74.79 t 72.37 t 47.67 4 47.33 * 55.06 * 59.59 t .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * 57.71
N= 5 N= 7 N= 5 N= 3 N= 43 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 67
15 * .1.00.73 4 125.09 $ 68.91. * .00 * 413.54 * .00 * .00 4 .00 * .00 * .00 * 82.81
N= A N= 4 N= 5 N= 0 N= 3 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 18 t*
6
16 * .00 4 94.39 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ 94,39 g
_ N= 0 N= 5 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 5
i ?
g 18 * .00 * 227.37 * 50.22 * 51.40 * 71.46 * 5.1..48 4 .00 * .00 4 .00 4 .00 * 101.80 OS
N= 0 N= 5 N= 2 N= 1 N= 9 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 21 ^
21 * .00 4 219.26 4 120.02 4 .00 4 .00 4 56.05 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 107.43
N= 0 N= 3 N= 6 N= 0 N= 0 N= 8 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 17
24 4 .00 4 .00 4 201.33 4 106.75 4 84.94 4 82.73 * .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 101.44
N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 3 N= 4 N= 8 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 17
27 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 80.16 * .00 4 .00 4 ,00 4 .00 4 80.16
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 6 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 6
30 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 78.46 4 ,00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 70.46
N= 0 N- 0 H- 0 N= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
36 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 110.26 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 .00 4 110.26
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 9 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 9
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
UTAH
06
08
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
UNI
*
*
*
$
4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
r COST
32.00
28.26
32.58
40.05
42.18
53.41
46.42
61.81
55.56
43.91
41.82
57.50
APPURT
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
»
*
.76
6.39
8.71
V.44
26.09
11.78
36.67
29.91
20.53
23.09
21.28
30,64
NON-
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
i
*
$
*
*
-CONS <*/FT)
12.69
4.33
6.39
8.21
14.52
29.19
18.69
15,70
25,34
13.15
15.35
22,11
TOTAL
* At
$ 31
* 4;
* 5;
i e;
* 9'
* 101
* 10;
* 101
* 8(
* 7J
* 11C
46.26
101.80
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(CAST IRON PIPE - DEPTH < Cl FT.)
IMAM REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 KEG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 KEG 00 RED 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 22.39 * ,OO * .00 * .00 * .00 * 22.39
N= 0 N- 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1
OB 4 .00 t .00 * 27,90 * 12.51 t .00 * .00 t .00 $ .00 * ,00 * ,00 * 24,11
N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 1 N= 0 M= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
10 t .00 * .00 t .00 * 24.63 * 26.93 * 32.13 * .00 * .00 * .00 « .00 * 27.08
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 1 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
J2. * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 » 45.03 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 45.03 rf
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N=* 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 >
.16 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 43.39 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 « .00 * .00 * 43.39 S
-------
SANITARY StWERS
AVERAGE COST PEK FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
NON-CONS <*/FT> TOTAL COST (*/FT)
O
I
Ol
CO
06
08
10
12
I A
24
*
*
*
*
*
*
19.13
15.9,5
16,94
32.01
34.43
S4.72
*
*
*
*
t
*
2
5
5
9
3
30
.29
.61
.91
.16
,96
.69
$
*
$
$
«
$
.96
2.56
4.21
3.85
4.99
19.03
t
$
*
$
*
$
22.39
24.11
27.08
45.03
43.39
104,45
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT Of" PIPK
(CAST IRON PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
UTAH
06
oe
.10
.1.2
.1.6
1(3
S4
REG
t
N =
t
N=
* 4 1
N~
* 56
N-
* .151
N-
*
N--
*
N==
01
.00
O
.00
0
. 26
y
.02
1
.67
3
,00
0
,00
0
REG 02
t , 00
N« 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N-~ 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 03
* .00
N- 0
t 37.48
N= 1 .1.
* ,00
N= 0
* 70.93
N= 1
* . 00
N= 0
* . 00
N- 0
$ ,00
N-- 0
REG
*
N~
* 17
N==
* 37
N=
$ 34
N=
* 45
N*
t
.N=
«
N=
04
.00
0
.87
4
.76
7
.88
'2
.42
f't
.00
0
.00
0
REG 05
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
t
*
*
*
*
*
t
REG
17
N =
33
N=
41
N=
47
N--
N=
77
N=
1113
N=
06
.9£l
2
.47
2
..13
2
.79
1.0
.00
0
.14
5
.33
S
REG 07
t
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N~
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG 08
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N<= 0
t .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 09
* .00
N- 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N== 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 10
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
NAT IONAL
$
»
*
*
*
t
*
17
N=
32
N=
39
•N=
48
N=
1.09
N=
77
N=
1113
N=
.98
2
,40
17
.01
11
.18
14
.17
5
.14
5
, 33
5
H
|
M
O
T
^
-------
tn
on
SANl'IAI'iY SEWERS
AVERAOE COST CER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(CAST IRON PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
HAM UNIT COST
06
08
10
12
16
10
24
t
*
$
*
*
$
t
14.72
22.26
22 . 49
31.46
52.06
47.84
66.24
APPURT <*/FT>
*
*
«
*
*
*
*
2.29
6.66
7.64
11.17
39.33
20.63
36.67
NON-CONS (*/FT> TOTAL COST
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
3
0
5
17
B
15
.96
.46
.06
.54
.77
.66
.41
t
t
*
$
$
*
*
17.98
32.40
39.01
48.18
109.17
77.14
1113 .,33
(*/FT)
11)
14)
5>
5)
5)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(CAST IRON PIPE - HEPTH > 15 FT,)
VlfiH RtG 01 REO 02 REG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG OB REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
08 * .00 * .00 * 47. A3 * . 00 * .00 * ,00 * . 00 t .00 * .00 * .00 * 47.65
N= 0 N- 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1
10 * .00 * ,00 * 60.59 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 t .00 $ .00 $ . OO * 60.59
N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2
12 * ,00 * .00 * 73.30 * 56.26 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 t 61.94 §
N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 |3
18 * .00 * .00 t 141.10 * .00 * ,00 * .00 4 .00 * .00 * .00 t .00 * 141.1O ?
N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 O>
-------
O
en
SANITARY SEUKRS
AVERAGE; COST PER roar OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(CAST IRON PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
MAM UNIT COST
0«
10
12
IB
*
*
*
*
2V. 01
3fl . 23
32 . 65
46.70
APPURT <*/FI>
*
*
*
*
13.66
14.30
17.77
69.20
NON-CONS <*/FT>
t
*
*
$
4.96
7.90
11.51
25.11
TOTrtL COST ($/FT)
* 47.65 (N= 1)
* 60.59
-------
S«N1f Aft* SEUERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
tilAN REG 01 REG O2 REU 03 REG 01 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG O9 REG 10 NATIONAL
04
06
08
10
15
16
?
U1
00 18
21
24
27
30
36
48
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
.00
N== 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
116.94
N-~ 1
.00
N= 0
158.99
N= 1
,00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
H- 0
t
t
*
*
*
t
t
t
t
t
*
*
*
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
137.42
N= 1
195.13
N= 1
49.09
N= 1
288 . 28
N= 2
185.28
N= 3
.00
N* 0
74.04
N= 1
If.i5..t7
N" "3
206 , 08
N= 3
,00
N= 0
*
N=
i
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
* 55
N=
*
N=
* 104
N=
* 66
M-
*
N=
.00
0
.00
O
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.40
2
.00
0
.49
t
. 30
1
.00
0
*
t
$
*
*
*
t
t
*
t
t
*
*
N=
N=
N=
N=
21
N=
N=
33
N=
31
N=
53
N=
N=
76
N»
383
N=
176
N=
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.77
2
.00
0
.47
4
.45
1
,62
5
.00
0
,63
3
.44
1
.86
1
*
*
*
*
$
$
$
*
*
*
*
$
»
.00
N= O
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
58.50
N= 1
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
76,73
N= 2
45.99
N= 1
164.61
N= 1
68 . 75
N= 1
145.93
N= 1
.00
N= 0
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N*
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
*
N-
*
N=
*
N=
*
N«
*
N=
t
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N-
t
N=
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
,00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
,00
0
$ ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N=» 0
* .00
N<= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= O
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
« .00
N= 0
» .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
i .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 12.37
N= 1
* 14.66
N= 1
$ 16.68
N= 1
* 21.64
N= 1
* .00
N— rt
•*• v
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 12
N=
* 14
N=
* 16
N=
* 79
N=
$ 82
N=
* 49
N=
t 124
N=
* 123
N*
* 53
N=
* 119
N=
* 108
N=
* 202
N=
* 176
N=
.37
1
.66
1
.68
1
.53
2
.82
5
.09
1
.20
7
.46
6
.11
8
.43
2
.58
a
.32
6
.86
1
£
-------
o
en
RANITAKf SKUERS
E COSI fER FOOT OF PIPE
(REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
DJAM
04
06
on
10
is
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
48
UNj
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
rr cos r
10.53
10., Evi
9 . 35
41.33
24.04
37.98
25.10
36,69
24 . 05
45.97
41.81
57.36
66.97
APPURT (*/FT)
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
t
*
.
1.
3.
25.
38 .
6.
50.
38 .
13,
56,
26.
32.
53.
83
87
32
10
94
50
68
?2
82
90
32
18
63
NON
4
*
*
*
it
*
$
$
*
*
*
*
$
-CONS (t/FT) TOTAL COST <*/FT>
2
3
13
19
4
4fl
4f)
15
16
40
110
56
.99
.24
.99
.08
.83
.59
.32
.54
.23
.54
.43
.76
.25
*
$
$
*
$
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
$
12.37 (N=
14.66 ( N=
16.68 (N=
79.53
6)
1)
-------
BfcUF.hfi
AVKRAfiK 10TAL COS! PER FOOT OF PIPE
(REINfORCEB CONCRETE PIPE - »EPTH 8-15 FT.)
til AM
04
06
08
10
12
15
14
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
REO
*
N=
*
N--
*
N=
*
N=
* 46,
N=
* 117.
N=
* .
N=
* 159,
N=
* 1X0.
N=
* 241.
N=
*
N=
* 167,
H=
* 254.
N=
*
N=
* 445.
N=
01
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
16
I
02
4
00
0
98
7
69
3
8B
5
00
0
82
5
61
3
00
0
08
1
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
%
t
*
t
*
$
$
*
REG
N-
N"
N=
N=
N=
N=
70
N=
53
N=
.123
ON
130
N=
146
N-
128
N=
155
N=
180
N=
208
N=
02
.00
0
. 00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.31
2
.67
5
,29
15
.90
IS
.91
9
.23
38
.57
45
,05
5
.0.1.
3
REG
t
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
* 31
N=
* 38
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
* 77
N=
*
N=
* 106
N=
* 72
N=
$
N=
* 120
N=
03
.00
0
,OO
0
,00
0
.00
0
.22
4
,46
3
,00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.91
16
.00
0
,47
4
.54
4
,00
0
.72
4
REG
*
N'=
*
N =
*
N=
$
N=
*
N,-=
$ 25
N=
*
N=
* 37
N=
* 35
N=
* 54
N"
4 59
N=
* 81
N=
* 166
N=
* 147
N-
* 182
N-
04
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.02
4
.00
0
.08
15
.82
4
. 29
24
.35
1
.78
16
.45
17
.52
11
.37
4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
$
*
*
*
*
KEG
N"
N=
N=
N=
N=
53
N=
N==
65
N=
70
N-
75
N<=
123
N<=
81
N=
109
N=
183
N=
N=
05
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,92
18
,00
0
.60
20
,49
27
.47
34
.63
10
.59
:17
.85
19
.59
12
.00
0
REG 06
* .00
N" 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N=" 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N-- 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N" 0
REG 07
* ,00
N<* 0
* , 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* ..00
N-- 0
REG 08
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* , 00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG 09
* .00
N=» 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* . 00
N= O
* ,00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
REG
* 15
N=
* 17
N=
* 19
N=
* 24
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
»
N=
*
N=
$
N=
10
.68
3
.97
3
.99
3
.95
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
NATIONAL
*
*
$
$
*
$
*
$
*
*
$
*
$
$
$
15.613
N= 3
17.97
N= 3
19.99
N= 3
24.95
N= 3
34.20
N= 5
57.03
N= 29
70.31
N= 2
69.28
N= 47
89.96
N= 49
88, IB
N= 94
130.90
N= 20
110.42
N= 80
147.40
N= 88
168.79
N= 28
190.12
N= 12
M
a
' 14 * .00 t 70.31 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * ,00 * .00 * 70.31 O
O N= 0 N= ?. N= V N= O N= O N= O N= O N= O N= O N= O N= i.' ON
2!
-------
54
* .00
N= 0
* 243, 79
N= 1
N=
.00 * 236.36 * 126.60 *
0 N= 9 N= 4
.00
N=
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 207.12
N= 14
.00
0
* 343.43 *
N= 16
.00 * 271.03 * 230.80 *
N=
N=
1
N=
.00
0
* .00
N= 0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
$ 327.01
N= I
66
72
* . 00
N= o
* .00
.00
O
* .00
U- 0
.00 * 287.48
0 N= .1
* 434.20 * 273.27 *
N=
.00
0
.00
$ .00
N= 0
$ .00
N=
0
* . 00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
,00 *
0
.00 *
0
.00
0
.00
0
* .00
N- O
* .00
N= 0
$ 287.48
N- 1
* 369,83
N- 5
£
tr*
M
o
en
Os
a
o
o
0
(D
0.
-------
o
I
cr>
ro
SANMAIiY SEWERS
AWRAOt- COST l-'f-K FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
in AM
04
06
OB
10
12
15
16
IB
21
24
27
30
36
42
IB
54
60
66
72
UNIT COST
t
t
$
*
*
*
t
$
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
t
$
4
.1 3.05
13,85
12.66
13,50
23.29
27.24
53.132
3:1. .09
41.67
36.50
58 . 6 1
48.73
66,61
109.57
77.14
111. OH
175.22
121,06
184.13
API'URT (*/FT)
t
t
t
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
$
$
*
t
»
$
$
$
*
.83
1,87
3.32
5 . 20
5.90
18.30
6.87
22.63
25.63
28.59
40.32
29.27
33.58
31.24
58,21
50 . 96
89.62
110.76
107.69
NON-CONS
$
t
$
t
*
$
$
*
t
*
*
*
$
$
*
*
*
*
*
•
2.
3.
6.
5.
11.
9,
15.
22.
23,
31.
32.
47.
27.
54.
45.
62.
55.
78.
<4/FT
99
24
99
24
00
49
61
55
65
08
96
41
20
98
76
08
96
64
00
) TOTAL COST
$
*
*
*
*
t
*
$
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
t
*
«
$
15.68
17.97
19.99
24.95
34 . 20
57.03
70.31
69,28
89.96
88.18
130.90
110.42
147.40
168.79
190,12
207.12
327,81
287.48
369.83
<*/FT)
29)
2)
47)
49)
94)
20)
80)
88)
28)
12)
14)
19)
1)
5)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
IJIAM
10
12
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
4f)
54
60
66
72
REG
t
N=
*
N=
4 87.
N=
4
N=
4
N =
4 120.
N=
4 250.
N=
*
N=
4 215.
N=
4 226.
H-
4 .
N=
4 514.
N=
4
N=
4 .
N-
4
N=
4
N=
01
00
0
00
0
07
2
00
0
00
0
99
2
01
5
00
0
13
4
64
5
00
0
39
4
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
REG 02
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 67.00
N= 5
4 53.36
N= 3
4 200.40
N= 3
4 108,22
N= 14
4 138.95
N= 4
4 102.46
N= 28
4 178.70
N= 48
4 290.95
N= 1.6
4 257.43
N~- 14
4 204.79
N= 2
4 374.98
N= 23
4 436.02
N= 7
4 487.13
N= 16
(REINFORCED
REG 03 REG
4 ,
N=
4 40.
N=
4 45.
N-
4
N<=
4
N=
4
N=
4 93.
N=
4
N~
« 121.
N=
4 100.
N=
4
N-
4
N=
V »
N=
4
N=
4 .
N=
t 270.
N=
00
0
25
1
61
1
00
0
00
0
00
0
It
11
00
0
14
6
23
5
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
82
7
4
N=
4
N=
4 31
N=
4
N=
4 43
N=
4 43
4 . 65
N=
4 64
N=
4 94
N=
4 .1.40
N--
4 228
N-
4 214
N=
4 279
N=
4 265
N =
4
N=
4
N=
CONCRETE PIPE - DEPTH >
04 REG 05 REG 06
.00
0
.00
0
.38
3
.00
0
.52
6
,30
1
.42
16
.00
2
.33
2B
,03
27
.37
14
.04
5
.49
27
.01
11
.00
0
.00
0
4
4
4
t
$
4
$
4
4
4
4
4
4
$
4
4
30 . 22
N= 1
32,16
N= 1
56.61
N= .1.8
.00
N= 0
77.43
N= 25
85.50
N= 35
06.47
N-~ 30
131.69
N= 24
117.02
N= 28
156.58
N== 11
206.93
N= 16
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
203 , 54
N= 16
294.83
N= 5
.00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 , 00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
15 FT. >
REG 07
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 . 00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 . 00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
* . 00
N= 0
REG 00
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N=» 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,<>0
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= O
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
REG 09
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N=* 0
4 .00
N= 0
REG 10
4 ,OO
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N=» 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N=> 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
NATIONAL
4 30
N=
4 36
N=
4 55
N=
4 67
N=
4 69
N=
4 94
N=
4 96.
• N=
4 128.
N=
.. 4 134.
N=
4 163.
N=
4 245,
N=
4 292.
N=
4 279.
N=
4 321.
N=
4 377.
N =
4 423.
N =
.22
1
.20
2
.53
24
.08
5
.32
34
.69
41
.74
84
.15
30
43
94
70
96
46
46
69
23
06
29
53
50
66
12
73
23
1-3
f
O
b
-------
a
i
cr>
SAN I IflIVY SEWFRS
AVF.KAUE COB I PltR FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(KKINFORCEli CONCRETE PIPE -- DEPTH > 15 FT.)
IHAM
J.O
J2
IS
16
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
UNIT COST
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(DUCTILE IRON PIPE - DEPTH < 0 FT.)
IMAM REG 01 REG 02 RER 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
08 * .00 * 35.08 * 3A.90 * 15.29 * 32,56 * 42.24 * .00 t .00 * .00 t .00 * 31.76
N= 0 H~ 4 N= 1 N= 2 N= 1 N<= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 9
10 * .00 4 25.20 * .00 * 25.90 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 25.76
N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 5
12 * .00 * 713,74 4 .00 * 29.17 * 32. .'59 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 » 42.47
N~ 0 N= 1 N= 0 N* 2 N= 1 N= 0 N- 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
16 * .00 t 77.85 * .00 t 47.93 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * S5.41 rf
N-~ 0 N~- 1 N= 0 N= 3 N= 0 N* 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4 >
a
Jl:l * .00 * .00 * .00 * 45.20 * .00 * 61,64 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 49.37 M
N= 0 N= 0 N~ 0 N- 3 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4 o
•
24 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 7A.33 * .00 * 90.58 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 81.00 <*
N« 0 N= 0 N= 0 N=< 2 N= 0 N» 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 ^
30 * ,00 t .00 * .00 * 1311,19 * .00 * .00 * .00 4 .00 * .00 t .00 * 138.19
N= 0 N- 0 N= 0 N= Z N= 0 N=° 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N~ 2
36 * .00 $ .00 * .00 t 260.16 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 260.1A
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N=» 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1
42 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 364.40 t ,00 * .00 * .00 t .00 * ,00 » .00 * 364.40
N-- 0 N= 0 N== 0 N= 1 N=> 0 N= 0 N= 0 N*> 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER fDOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
OHIC'tlLE IRON PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
DIAM UNIT COOT APPIIRT (*/FT> NON-CONS (*/FT) TOTAL COST <*/FT)
O
I
cn
cr>
08
10
12
1.6
IB
24
30
36
42
*
*
*
*
*
t
$
t
t
23 . 1 5
19.09
23.04
26.96
29.61
53.62
105.65
206 . 34
280 . 26
$
*
*
*
t
»
*
*
$
"
3
11
12
9
13
16
30
41
.44
.10
.33
,99
.45
,53
.48
.17
.06
*
*
*
$
*
*
t
»
$
4,16
3.55
8.09
15.45
10.30
13.92
16.05
31.64
43.06
*
*
*
*
$
*
$
*
*
31.76
25.76
42.47
55.41
49,37
81.00
138.17
268.16
364.40
1)
1)
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(DUCTILE IKON PIPE - DEPTH B-15 FT.)
lit AM
06
08
10
12
15
O
1 16
5
IB
24
30
36
42
RF:B
t
N=
* 52
N=
* 74
N=
•t 05
N=*
$
N=
$
N=
9 1613
N=
*
N"
* 261
N=
t
N=
*
N =
01
.00
0
,86
4
.49
6
.17
1
.00
0
.00
0
.16
3
.00
0
.34
1
.00
0
.00
0
RF.G
*
N=
* 49
N=
* 1.70
N-
« 137
N=
$
N=
* flO
N=
*
N =
* 1.04
N-
$
N=
*
N=
*
N =
02
.00
0
.80
14
.99
1
.39
3
.00
0
.08
2
.00
0
.70
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
m:r; 03
* .00
N= 0
* 44.81
N= 2
$ .00
N=> 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* 75 . 02
N= 2
* 138.31
N= 1
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N-- 0
* .00
N= 0
REG
t
N-
t 19
N=
$ 34
N=
$ 31
N=
$
N=
* 47
N=
* 61
N=
* 105
N=
* 141
N=
* 274
N=
* 371
N=
04
.00
0
.10
1
.29
7
.94
1
.00
0
,91
6
.42
7
.45
12
.82
8
.32
4
.71
4
REG
* 38
N=
* 29
N=
* 40
N=
$ 52
N=
$
N~
t 74
H~
* 75
N==
* 148
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N--
OS
.16
1
.52
3
.37
2
.99
2
.00
0
.80
1
.31
1
.05
I
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG
*
N=
* 45
N=
t 28
N=
$
N=
* 55
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
06
.00
0
.09
1
.63
1
.00
0
.38
1
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG 07
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
*
N =
*
N=
$
N<*
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
$
N=
$
N=
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG on
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=»
*
N=
t
N=
$
N=
t
N=
$
N=
*
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG 09
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
$
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N =
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
REG 10
$ .00
N* 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N« 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
NATIONAL
* 38
N=
* 46
N=
* 56
N=
* 69
N=
* 55
N=
* 61
N=
* 91,
N=
.16
1
.04
25
.90
17
.32
7
.88
1
.28
11
.51
12
Hi
fe
M
O
OV
1
XD
* 108.19
N=
* 155.
N=
t 274.
N=
* 371 .
N=
15
10
9
32
4
71
4
-------
o
I
00
SANITftRY S^WF.RS
AVERAI3F COB! PE'R FIIDI' (if- PIPE (NATIONAL)
(DUCTtLE IRON PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
UAH UNIT COS!
06
00
10
12
15
16
If)
24
30
36
42
*
*
t
4
4
4
*
4
4
4
4
36.
,50.
32.
33.
42.
32.
35.
65.
109.
212.
287.
7:1
57
41
36
79
41
37
53
22
50
sa
APPUF
4
*
*
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
i'T ( 4/FT )
.88
7.79
9.87
22.32
4.58
10.51
34.49
25,57
22. SI
30.:I7
41.06
NON-CONS (4/FT
4
4
*
$
4
4
4
*
4
4
4
.56
7.67
14.61
13.63
0.50
18.34
21.64
1 7 . 08
23 . 36
31.64
43,06
) TOTAL COST
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
*
4
4
38.16
46.04
56,90
69,32
55,88
61.28
91.51
108.19
155.10
274.32
371.71
(4/FT)
(N=
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(DUCTILE IRON PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
IMAM REG 01
08 4 . 00
N== 0
10 t 86.1V
12 4 80.37
N= 1
16 4 .00
N= 0
18 * .00
N= 0
24 * .00
N= 0
30 4 ,00
N= 0
36 * .00
N= 0
42 4 .00
N= 0
REG 02
4 93.73
N- 8
4 .00
N= 0
4 119.41
N= 3
4 .00
N= 0
* 208.66
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
H- 0
4 . 00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
REG 03
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
9 . 00
N= 0
4 81.63
N= 2
4 91. .49
* .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
REG
4
N=
4
N=
4
N=
4 76
N=
4 93
N=
4 1.53
N=
4 107
N=
4 2B2
N =
* 389
N=
04
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.08
3
.56
5
.33
12
.39
3
.02
1
.III
4
REG
4
N=
4 52
N=
4 63
N-
N=
4 81
N=
4 115
N=
4 144
N--
4
N=
4
N=
OS
.00
0
.00
1
.51
6
.00
0
.61
i
.22
1
.83
2
.00
0
.00
0
REG 06
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 68 . 1 a
N= 10
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
REG 07
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
REG 00
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 . 00
N= 0
REO 09
« .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 . 00
N= 0
4 ,00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
REO 10
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
4 .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
NATIONAL
* 93.73
N= 8
4 74.79
N= 3
4 82.76
N= 10
4 78.78
N= 5
4 89.48
N= 18
4 150.40
N= 13
t 122.37
N= 5
* 282.02
N= 1
4 389.81
N= 4
I
M
-------
o
I
SANITAIiY SETUEIVS
AVfcKABE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(IJUCTILE IRON PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
i.I AH UNI I COST
00
10
12
16
1W
24
30
36
42
$
t
*
t
*
*
t
t
$
7A.73
.-Vi.M
51.fi 2
42.39
50 . 1 3
80 . 00
70,75
220.20
305,67
APPIJRT (*/FD
*
t
*
*
t
t
$
*
*
9
6
10
IB
20
4fi
24
30
41
.01
.74
.70
,3H
.41
.00
.58
.17
.06
NON-CONS <$/FT) TOTAL COST
* 7.
* 31.
* 12.
* IB.
* 18.
* 24.
* 27.
* 31.
* 43.
79
50
23
04
93
59
03
64
06
*
*
*
t
t
$
*
t
t
93.73
74.79
82.76
78.70
89. 4B
150.40
122.37
282.02
389.81
<*/FT>
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(OTHER PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
BJAM REG Ot KEG 02 KEG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
00 * .00 * .00 * 22.75 * .00 t 16.20 t 14.78 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * 16.86
N= 0 N= 0 N« 1 N= 0 N= 3 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 6
10 t .00 * .00 $ 32.15 * .00 * 21.84 * .00 * .00 * .00 t .00 * .00 * 25.28
N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= ?. N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3
12 * .00 * ,00 f .00 * .00 * 26.44 * .00 $ .00 * .00 t .00 * ,00 * 26.44
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2
ri
15 * .00 t .00 * 65.35 $ .00 * .00 $ .00 t .00 * .00 t .00 * .00 » 65.35 fe
N-- 0 N-= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N=» 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N=> 1 p
W
18 * .00 t .00 * 108.00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 « .00 * 10B.OO U
N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 Jjs
I
24 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * B5.63 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 t 85.63 W
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 1 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= O N= 1
-------
SAMI IARY KCWERS
E COST PER TOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(OTICR PIPE - DEPTH < 8 FT.)
LI I AM
oa
to
12
15
18
24
UNl'l COST
*
*
*
*
t
*
a . 4 1
11.20
1 0 . 00
J3.70
36.51.
24 . 90
APPURT <*/FD
*
't
t
t
*
*
5 .
9.
11.
22.
32.
4:1 .
45
77
07
24
03
95
NON-
*
*
*
*
*
$
-CONS <*/TT> TOTAL.
2.99
4.30
5.36
27.39
39 . 44
1.8.76
*
*
1
*
*
%
16
25
26
65
108
85
COST
6)
3)
2)
1)
1)
1)
H
ES
CTv
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AYERAOK TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(OTHER PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
RFI3 0:1 RE'li 02 Rt-Ci 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG 08 REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
06 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 19.45 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * .00 * 19.45
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 (4= 2
OB * .00 * .00 t 29.56 t .00 * 22.67 * 21.50 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 23.00
N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N" 0 N= 22 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N- 0 N= 0 N= 28
to * .00 * .00 * 36.82 t .00 $ 28.39 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 29.79
N" 0 N= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 20 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= <> N= 0 N= 24
12 $ .00 * .00 $ .00 * .00 * 31.88 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 t 31.88
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 13 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 13
1.5 t .00 * .00 * 70.57 * .00 * 45.72 * .00 * .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 « 54.01
N= 0 N-~ 0 N= 3 N- 0 N<= 6 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 9
18 * ,00 * .00 * .00 * .00 t 59,32 t .00 * .00 * .00 t . 00 * .00 t 59.32
O N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N" 0 N= 7 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 7
W 21 * .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 * 57.90 t .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 $ .00 * 57.90
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
t .00 * .00 * .00 * 82.29 * ,00 * .00 t .00 t .00 * .00 *" 82.29
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 9 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 9
27 * .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 t 105.08 t .00 * ,00 $ .00 * . 00 * .00 * 105.08
N= 0 N» 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N=* 0 N= 0 N= 2
30 * .00 * ,00 t .00 * 98.33 * 105.03 * .00 t .00 * .00 $ .00 t .00 * 101.69
N== 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 2 N= 2 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 4
36 * .00 t .00 * .00 * .00 t 157.03 * .00 * .00 * .00 t . 00 * .00 * 157.03
N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 6 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 6
42 » .00 t .00 t .00 * .00 * 107,94 * .00 t .00 $ .00 $ .00 * ,00 4 187.94
N= 0 N" 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3
60 * .00 t .00 * ,00 * 290.51 * ,00 » .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * .00 * 290.51
N- 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 0 N= 3
-------
F.ANTTARY SKWERS
AVCKAGE COST PtR FIllIT OF PII'E (NATIONAL)
(OTHER PIPE - DEPTH 8-15 FT.)
IH AM
06
08
10
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
36
42
60
KNIT COST
t
*
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
14.75
14.94
16.74
16.02
22.90
31.41
28 . 54
35.49
39 . 54
60.57
62.24
66.77
1 72 . 56
At-'PURI (*/FT)
t
t
*
*
t
t
t
*
t
$
*
$
$
3 . 65
5.51
9.07
11.07
18.28
17.63
11.92
29.77
51 .79
25.50
72.73
90 . 22
55 . 76
NON-CONS <*/TT) TOTAL COST
*
*
$
$
*
$
*
*
*
$
*
$
*
1
2
3
4
12
10
17
17
13
15
22
20
70
.04
.54
.98
.78
.82
.27
.43
.02
.73
.60
.05
.94
.17
$
$
*
*
*
$
*
*
$
t
*
*
*
19.45
23,00
29.79
31.88
54.01
59.32
57.90
82.29
105.08
101,69
157,03
187.94
298.51
(*/FT)
(N=
-------
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE TOTAL COST PER FOOT OF PIPE
(OTHER PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT.)
niAH REG 01 REG 02 REG 03 REG 04 REG 05 REG 06 REG 07 REG OB REG 09 REG 10 NATIONAL
00
10
12
15
IB
O
i 21
24
27
36
4.?
54
60
t
N«
t
N=
t
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
t
*
$
*
*
t
*
*
*
*
*
*
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
*
N=
$
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=
t
N=
*
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
$
*
*
$
$
*
*
*
t
*
$
*
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
.00
N= 0
309.31
t
*
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
*
27
N=
40
N=
52
N=
63
N=
60
N=
50
N=
86
N=
120
N=
171
N=
208
N=
349
N=
.47
10
.72
11
.21
14
.38
8
.87
5
.26
1
.67
11
.33
5
.74
8
.20
3
.90
1
.00
*
$
$
t
*
«
*
*
*
*
*
*
31
N=
N=
55
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
N=
,85
2
,00
0
.99
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
* .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
$
N=
t
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=
*
N=
t
N =
*
N=
*
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
» .00
N= 0
t ,00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
* .00
N= 0
» .00
N= 0
t .00
N= 0
$ .00
N= 0
t .00
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
*
N=
t
N=
%
N=
*
N=
t
N=
$
N=
*
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
$ 28
N=
* 40
N=
* 52
N=
* 63
N=
* 60
N=
* 50.
N=
* 86,
N=
* 120.
N=>
* 171.
N=
» 208.
N=
* 349.
N=
* 309.
.20
12
.72
11
,88
17
.38
8
.87
5
.26
1
,67
11
33
5
74
B
28
3
90
1
31
i-i
h-4
s
G
T"
a
-------
a
i
SANITARY SEWERS
AVERAGE COST PER FOOT OF PIPE (NATIONAL)
(OTHER PIPE - DEPTH > 15 FT,)
1)1 AM
08
10
12
15
18
21
24
27
36
42
54
60
UNIT COST
*
$
t
*
*
$
4
$
t
$
*
t
20.4:?
28.06
34.00
36.28
31.74
25.39
42,22
32 . 53
60,67
69.40
07.76
103.37
APPURT <*/FT)
«
*
*
*
*
$
*
*
*
*
$
t
5
9
13
20
23
18
27
52
87
107
207
33
.67
.:l.6
.54
.90
.02
.16
.10
.06
.24
.78
.19
.76
NON-CONS (t/FT> TOTAL COST
*
t
«
*
*
*
*
*
*
$
t
$
2.09
2.68
5.33
6.19
6.10
6.70
17. 35
15.73
23.02
31.09
54.94
70.17
*
*
*
t
*
*
*
$
$
*
*
.*
28.20
40.72
52.88
63.38
60.07
50.26
86.67
120.33
171.74
208.28
349,90
309.31
<*/FT>
------- |