United Slates
Environmental Protection
Agency
Off ice of
Water Program Operations
Washington, D.C. 20460
430/9-79001
1978 Needs Survey
Cost Estimates
for Construction of
Publicly-Owned
Wastewater Treatment
Facilities
FRD-1
-------
This Report was prepared under the direction of
James A. Chamblee, Chief
Priorities and Needs Assessment Branch (WH-595)
Office of Water Program Operations
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 426-4443
Additional copies of this publication may be ordered from
the following address:
U. S. Department of Commerce
National Technical Information Service
Springfield, VA 22151
-------
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
COST ESTIMATES
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
FEB 9 1979
THE ADMINISTRATOR
Honorable Thomas P. O'Neill, Jr.
Speaker of the House
of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Speaker:
Enclosed is the Environmental Protection Agency's report on the
results of the 1978 Survey required by sections 205(a) and 516(b)(l) of
the Clean Water Act. The purpose of this report is to estimate the
costs of construction of publicly-owned wastewater treatment facilities
needed to carry out the provisions of the Act and to estimate these
costs on a State-by-State basis.
The 1978 Survey estimates tffe overall remaining needs for the
conveyance and treatment of municipal sewage, and control of pollution
from combined sewer overflows to be $106 billion. Of this total, about
$54 billion are needed for new treatment plants and interceptors, which
historically were eligible under Public Law (84-660) as well as the
present Act.
The latest estimates reflect a better formulated and more con-
sistent survey methodology, greater amounts of information now available
from such sources as new facility plans, basin plans and discharge
permits, and the expansion of the survey to include all facilities
nationwide.
Several factors have reduced needs between 1976 and 1978. Other
factors have offset these. The net result is an estimate three percent
lower than the $109 billion (January 1978 dollars) reported in the 1976
Needs Survey. New projects approved between the 1976 and 1978 surveys
account for a reduction of more than $14 billion in the present survey
estimate. More careful reporting and better cost estimates have resulted
in reduced estimates for several categories of need. At the same time,
however, the effects of inflation, calculated at 6.8 percent per year
between 1976 and 1978, have added $13 billion to the present estimate.
-------
-2-
The completion of a national facilities inventory added the cost of
6,000 previously unidentified facilities to the needs. Also, Survey
reporting rules were changed to project needs to the year 2000, instead
of the year 1990. This change resulted in less reduction of needs, but
is more consistent with existing wastewater planning documents.
The 1978 estimate includes $26 billion for control of pollution
from combined sewer overflows. This is about twenty-four percent higher
than the estimate made in 1976, which reflects improved estimation
techniques as well as the completion of an inventory of combined sewer
areas.
While the best solution to the problems of urban drainage and
pollution control may be a joint multiple purpose project, we do not
consider that the costs allocable to drainage are or should be eligible
for grant funding under our program. The 1978 estimate for combined
sewers was based on the assumption that the 1985 goals of the Act could
be met even though not all overflows during a severe storm were completely
controlled. This assumption may not fully conform with some State
standards which could be interpreted to require massive expenditures for
the control of overflows from the worst storms of record.
While stormwater needs are not eligible for Federal grants, we have
also estimated need for the control of pollution from separate storm
sewers in sewered and non-sewered urbanized areas at $62 billion above
the $106 billion for the other types of facilities. The estimated costs
of control of stormwater pollution vary greatly depending upon how one
approaches the problem. After further research, we may conclude that
$62 billion is not the best estimate. We believe, however, that it is
nearer the mark than the estimates of prior Surveys.
The separate State estimates resulting from the 1978 Survey are
presented in the attached report. Total State estimates exceeded total
EPA estimates by only three percent. A relatively few States account
for most of this difference.
I believe that the totals in this report are an accurate overall
estimate of the cost of meeting the goals of the Clean Water Act of
1977, The costs reported for treatment and interceptors, in particular,
seem nationally consistent and well formulated.
The Agency has begun a detailed analysis of the cost data resulting
from the 1978 Survey. Our preliminary results indicate that if a high
rate of inflation continues in the grants program, a more focussed
-------
-3-
funding strategy may be necessary to meet the goals of the Clean Water
Act. Based on this analysis, the Agency will prepare and transmit to
Congress a recommended construction grants allotment formula, directed
toward meeting the goals of the Act more effectively.
I would be pleased to discuss further the results of this Survey at
your convenience.
Sin
Enclosure
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
I. Introduction 1
II. Explanation of the Survey 2
III. Results of the Survey 4
Table A - 1978 Needs Survey Summary Costs 5
Table B - Treatment Costs by Treatment Levels 9
Table C - Per Capita SMSA/Non-SMSA Needs 10
IV. Comparison With The 1976 Survey 11
Table D - Comparison of 1978 Survey with 1976
Survey 13
V. Quality of Facility Estimates, Categories I-V 15
VI. Quality of Category VI Estimates 17
VII. Conclusions 17
VIII. Future Needs Survey 18
Appendix A - Conduct of the Survey A-l
I. Categories I-IV A-l
II. Categories V-VI A-6
Table A-l Treatment Level Required for Recreation
Protection in Combined Sewer Areas A-12
Table A-2 Treatment Level Required for Recreation
Protection in Storm Sewered and Non-
Sewered Areas A-13
Appendix B - Reasons for Independent State Estimates B-l
Appendix C - Summary Tables C-l
-------
COST ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
The 1978 Needs Survey
I. INTRODUCTION
This report is submitted in compliance with the provisions of the
Clean Water Act, Sections 205(a) and 516(b)(l). Included in this report
are a detailed estimate of the cost of construction of all needed publicly-
owned treatment works in all of the States and the cost of construction
of all needed publicly-owned treatment works in each of the States, to
meet the 1983 goals of the Act. The cost estimates presented in this
Survey may serve as a basis for Congressional allotment of funds in
accordance with the provisions of the Act.
This is the fourth Needs Survey conducted since the enactment of
P.L. 92-500. Three previous Surveys were conducted in 1973, 1974, and
1976. The 1978 Survey had four goals aimed at improvement of the Needs
estimation process:
1. To secure estimates wuich are comparable nationwide,
2. To improve the overall quality of the estimates,
3. To develop a detailed informatton base to assist in
program planning and management, and
4. To produce a national inventory of wastewater treatment
facilities and combined sewer areas.
EPA, in a joint effort with an advisory group consisting of State
and Regional representatives, formulated the approach used in the 1978
Needs Survey. The approach selected called for an active role by EPA,
with State participation in varying degrees, State-by-State, depending
on resource priorities. This permitted the use of a single nationwide
methodology, with uniformly applied guidelines. Provision was made in
the guidelines for local cost variations due to local conditions affecting
construction costs.
-------
II. EXPLANATION OF THE SURVEY
A. Cost Categories
The 1978 Survey used the same cost estimate Categories as
were used in 1976. These Categories are:
Category I - SECONDARY TREATMENT. This included costs for
facilities which are only required to provide "secondary treatment"
or "best practicable wastewater treatment technology" (BPWTT). For
the purpose of the Survey, BPWTT and secondary treatment were
considered synonymous. Costs for systems designed to serve individual
residences are reported in this Category.
Category II - HIGHER THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT. Costs reported
in this Category are for treatment facilities that must achieve
treatment levels more stringent than secondary. This requirement
generally exists where water quality standards require removal of
such pollutants as phosphorus, ammonia, nitrates, or organic and
other substances. Included in Category II are the costs necessary
to raise the treatment level of Category II facilities to secondary
levels, e.g. if the existing treatment level of a facility is
primary, then costs necessary to raise the treatment level to
secondary are reported in Category II, together with the costs for
treatment levels greater than secondary.
Category IIIA - CORRECTION OF INFILTRATION/INFLOW. Included
are costs for correction of sewer system infiltration/inflow problems.
Costs could also be reported for a preliminary sewer system analysis
and for a detailed Sewer System Evaluation Survey.
Category IIIB - MAJOR REHABILITATION OF SEWERS. Requirements
for replacement and/or major rehabilitation of existing sewer
systems were reported in this Category. Costs were reported if the
corrective actions were necessary to the total integrity of the
system. Major rehabilitation is considered to be extensive repair
of existing sewers beyond the scope of normal maintenance programs,
where sewers are collapsing or structurally unsound.
Category IVA - NEW COLLECTOR SEWERS. This Category included
costs of construction of new collector sewer systems and appurtenances
designed to correct violations caused by raw discharges, seepage to
waters from septic tanks and the like, and/or to comply with
Federal, State or local actions.
-------
Category IVB - NEW INTERCEPTOR SEWERS. Included in this
Category were new interceptor sewers and transmission pumping
stations necessary for the bulk transport of wastewaters.
Category V - CONTROL OF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW. Costs
reported for this Category were for facilities to prevent and/or
control periodic bypassing of untreated wastes from combined
sewers to achieve water quality objectives and which are eligible
for Federal funding. It does not include treatment and/or control
of stormwaters in separate storm and drainage systems.
Category VI - TREATMENT AND/OR CONTROL OF STORMWATERS. This
Category included the costs of abating pollution in urbanized areas
from stormwater runoff channelled through sewers and other conveyances
used only for such runoff. The cost of abating pollution from
stormwater channelled through combined sewers which also carry
sewage are included in Category V.
The incremental cost for removal of pollutants such as toxic
substances are not included in the Needs Survey.
Appendix A explains the details of the conduct of the Survey.
B. Survey Dollars
All costs were estimated in January, 1978 dollars.
C. Populations
Two time periods are of interest to the Needs Survey for
population purposes. The first of these is the present, defined as
the July, 1977 population of the States as calculated by the
Bureau of the Census in publication P-25 (No.727). The second
population of interest is the future or projected population, based
on Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) projections for the year 2000.
The BEA population projections are used consistently in the Con-
struction Grants program.
Population estimates and projections are used as State
population ceilings for Needs Survey purposes in Categories I-IV.
These ceilings are not applicable to Categories V and VI.
-------
III. RESULTS OF THE SURVEY
A. EPA Assessment
The EPA assessment of the dollar need for construction of
municipal wastewater treatment facilities to serve year 2000
populations is $106.2 billion in Categories I through V, and an
additional $62 billion for control of stormwater (Category VI).
The States' estimate for the same needs are $109.1 billion for
Categories I-V and $62 billion for Category VI (treatment and/or
control of stormwaters).
Table A contains a summary of national needs by Category.
Appendix C contains tables detailing the Survey results.
Included in the Needs assessment is $54.1 billion for Categories
I, II and IVB (treatment plants and interceptors) that reflect the
costs for the traditional Water Quality Program of Treatment Plants
and Interceptor Sewers.
B. Independent State Estimates
After EPA formulation of cost estimates, States were asked
to review these estimates and concur or provide additional data to
support differing costs. In many cases, these data were supplied,
and the resultant EPA assessments reflect those changes.
In some instances, however, differences in cost estimates were
irreconcilable between EPA and State participants. In this case,
State participants provided an independent State estimate of need
differing from the EPA estimate, and usually higher in cost.
The reason for differing cost estimates was, in general, not
associated with construction costs themselves, but with States'
beliefs that Survey guidelines should be amended and/or adjusted in
these areas to permit higher costs to be reported.
C. Differences Between State and EPA Estimates
A total of over 155,000 possible individual cost estimates
were investigated by EPA. Over 55,000 of these possible estimates
resulted in a need. Table 42 shows for each State the number of
individual cost estimates made by EPA in Categories I-IV (treatment
plants and sewers), which resulted in a need. For Categories V and
VI (control of combined sewer overflow and stormwater), two estimates
per State were made for the capital costs of achieving the 1985
goals of the Act. One estimate was for current (1977) populations,
and the other for 2000 populations.
-------
TABLE A - 1978 Needs Survey Summary Costs
(January, 1978 Dollars in Billions)
EPA State Percent
Needs Category Assessment Estimate Difference Difference
I (Plants Which Require Only
Secondary Treatment) 15.09 15.17 .08 .005
II (Plants Which Require
More Stringent Treatment
Than Secondary*)
A. To Achieve Secondary Levels (10.2)
B. Advanced Secondary Levels (6.8)
C. Advanced Treatment Levels (3.5)
Total Category II 20.51 21.78 1.27 6
IIIA (Infiltration/Inflow) 2.44 2.56 .12 5
IIIB (Replacement and/or Rehabilitation) 4.88 4.94 .06 1
IVA (New Collector Sewers) 19.02 19.19 .18 1
IVB (New Interceptor Sewers) 18.47 18.68 .21 1
V (Combined Sewer Overflows) 25.74 26.76 1.02 4
Total I, II, IVB 54.07 55.63 1.56 3
Total I - V 106.15 109.08 2.93 3
VI (Control of Stormwater) 61.67 61.70 0 0
Total I - VI 167.82 170.78 2.96 2
* Split of Category II Needs provided by EPA only. No State participation included.
-------
Of over 155,000 separate potential cost estimates investigated
by EPA, only 2953 (2 percent) independent estimates were submitted
by States, representing 3 percent of the Needs. Table 43 shows for
each State the number of independent estimates submitted in Categories
I-IV, by Category of Need. The bulk of these independent estimates
are:
Percent of Number of Percent of EPA
State State Estimates Dollar Assessment
Wisconsin 2.6 18.1
Maryland 2.5 5.5
Michigan 2.0 3.4
Nevada 3.2 8.5
New York 32.2 7.0
Washington .002 3.2
A total of forty States and Territories reported no independent
State estimates differing from EPA estimates. For Categories V &
VI, independent State estimates were submitted only for California
and Vermont. A description of the reasons for independent State
estimates is given in Appendix B.
Of approximately 155,000 possible estimates, 1,267 separate
estimates representing 758 Survey forms were submitted by States.
Most of these estimates were based on State-developed cost curves
or State population projections exceeding allowable ceilings. Other
reasons for separate estimates include disagreement on allocation
of dollars between Categories I-IV versus Category V, inclusion of
ineligible facilities, and differing inflation factors.
D. Assessment of Backlog
A continued appendage to the Survey was the assessment of need
for present populations (the backlog of need). Needs for Categories
I-V present populations are estimated to be $79 billion, or 74
percent of the year 2000 needs. Note that because of their nature,
year 2000 Needs for Categories IIIA (infiltration/inflow correction)
and IIIB (major sewer rehabilitation) are almost exclusively all
backlog needs. In addition, for reasons detailed in Section 211 of
P.L. 95-217 and the Construction Grant Regulations (40 CFR 35.925-
13), all of the Category IVA (collector sewers) needs for year 2000
are theoretically also backlog needs (see Section V for a discussion
of the extent to which Category IVA in practice includes provision
for future population growth). The differences, therefore, are
most graphically illustrated in Categories I, II, and IVB (treatment
plants and interceptor sewers), where backlog needs represent only
45 percent of the year 2000 needs. Backlog and 2000 needs are
presented by Category in the following table:
-------
Needs Category
Year 2000 EPA
Assessment
Backlog Percent
Estimate Difference
I (Secondary Treatment)
II (Hore Stringent Treatment)
A. Secondary Levels
B. Advanced Secondary
C. Advanced Treatment
Total Category II
IIIA (Infiltration/Inflow)
IIIB (Replacement and/or Rehab.)
IVA (New Collector Sewers)
IVB (New Interceptor Sewers)
V (Combined Sewer Overflow)
Total I, II, IVB
Total I-V
VI (Control of Stormwater)
Total I-VI
15.09
(10.2)
(6.8)
(3.5)
20.51
2.44
4.88
19.02
18.47
25.74
54.07
106.15
61.67
167.82
9.66
36
10.63
2.44
4.87
19.02
6.69
25.74
26.98
79.05
45.70
124.75
48
0
0
0
64
0
50
26
26
26
The differences between backlog and year 2000 needs are
substantial both because of the increase in population projected
from the present (220 million persons) to the year 2000 (270
million persons) and to the increase in percent of population
projected to be served by municipal systems (from 69 percent at
present to 88 percent in year 2000).
The differences between backlog and future estimates has grown
between 1976 and 1978, for two major reasons. First, the target
date for future needs was changed from year 1990 to year 2000, a
change made to bring needs estimates more in line with existing
planning efforts in the wastewater field. This change added an
estimated $4.3 billion to future needs as a result of the addition
of 11 million people. Second, the effect of grant awards seems to
be greater on backlog needs than on future needs. Backlog needs
were reduced by more than 25 percent from 1976 to 1978, while
future needs were reduced by about 10 percent.
The costs reported for the backlog are sufficient only for
facilities necessary to serve the June, 1977 populations. They do
not include any costs for reserve capacity which would be required
by the Act to be included in these facilities for population growth
beyond 1977. They also exclude estimates for treatment plants and
sewers that were not necessary at all in 1977, but are projected to
be necessary for year 2000 populations. Backlog needs, as determined
by EPA, are shown in Table 36.
-------
E. Costs of Plants Requiring Treatment More Stringent than
Secondary (Category II)
Category II cost estimates include all costs for each treatment
facility where required treatment levels are higher than secondary,
including costs to bring treatment levels to secondary. Using cost
curves derived from recently completed treatment construction
projects, EPA estimated those portions of Category II needs required
for three levels of construction:
1. to upgrade Category II facilities to secondary treatment
levels - $10.2 billion.
2. to upgrade Category II facilities from secondary levels to
advanced secondary levels. Advanced secondary levels are
, achieved in general when effluent limits for BOD are between
30 and 10 mg/1. (85-95 percent removal) and no nitrogen
removal requirements exist. These costs are estimated at $6.8
billion, or 19 percent of total treatment needs, and 30 percent
of treatment projects.
3. to raise Category II facilities from advanced secondary
levels to advanced treatment levels (AWT). Advanced treatment
is defined as removal of BOD above 95 percent (less than 10
mg/1) or nitrogen removal requirements. The estimate for AWT
costs is $3.5 billion, which represents 10 percent of total
treatment needs, and 6 percent of treatment projects.
Table B shows the distribution of treatment costs among the
various sub-categories of treatment level.
F. Urban/Non-Urban Meeds
Meeds in Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSA's) were
estimated, as well as needs outside of SMSAs. While the areas
outside of SMSAs may include communities of up to 50,000 population,
this division provides some idea of the relative division between
urban and non-urban needs. Table C shows the split of year 2000
needs into SMSA/non-SMSA categories. This table shows that the per
capita needs in the Nation's metropolitan areas remain above the
national average, while needs outside of metropolitan areas are
below that average. The table also shows that almost all sewer
rehabilitation needs are found in metropolitan areas, while col-
lector sewer costs tend to be higher in rural areas, where dis-
tances are greater.
-------
NEEDS CATEGORY
Category I -
(Secondary Treatment)
Category II -
Treatment More Stringent
than Secondary)
TOTAL
Number of Projects
TABLE B - TREATMENT COSTS BY TREATMENT LEVEL
(BILLIONS OF JANUARY 1978 DOLLARS)
NEED TO ACHIEVE ADVANCED SECONDARY
TOTAL NEEDS SECONDARY TREATMENT LEVELS TREATMENT LEVELS
15.1
20.5
35.6
17,258
15.1
10.2
25.3 (71 percent)
10,972 (64 percent)
6.8
6.8 (19 percent)
5,213 (30 percent)
ADVANCED WASTE
TREATMENT LEVELS
3.5
3.5 (10 percent)
1,073 (6 percent)
-------
TABLE C - 1978 NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA SMSA/NON-SMSA NEEDS
(DOLLARS PER CAPITA)
CATEGORIES
Category I
Category II
Category IIIA
Category 1 1 IB
Category IVA
Category IVB
Category V
Total I, II, IVB
Total I-V
WITHIN SMSA'S
67
100
10
30
84
89
122
256
502
OUTSIDE SMSA'S
73
72
11
2
94
69
137
214
458
NATIONAL AVERAGE
68
93
11
22
86
83
127
245
490
-------
G. Needs for Large Financially Troubled Urban Core Areas
Major U. S. metropolitan areas have large needs. A few areas
have needs above $1 billion. The New York metropolitan area is the
city with by far the greatest need, estimated at $7 billion in
Categories I-V. The major components of that need are shown below.
Needs Category Amount for N.Y. Amount for New York City
Metro Area
(millions of dollars)
Category I 2,086 I 1,887
Category II 753 0
Category IIIA 12 0.4
Category IIIB 2,754 2,754
Category IVA 1,405 484
Category IVB 1,285 326
Category V 2,519 1,742
Total 10,814 7,193
While needs in the metro area have decreased since the 1976
Survey by about 10 percent, needs in the city have remained almost
constant at seven billion dollars. This situation is not unique to
New York, but is a common occurrence in financially troubled cities,
which have little prospect of financing the local share of more
than a small percentage of their wastewater treatment and conveyance
needs. The national total of needs in the ten most financially
distressed large cities is about $15 billion. A hard core of need
exists which is not likely to be met in the foreseeable future, in
most of these cities.
IV. COMPARISON WITH THE 1976 SURVEY
A. Treatment Plants and Sewers (Categories I-IV)
The estimates of needs for the 1978 Survey in Categories I-IV
built on the experience and information from previous Needs Surveys.
EPA, in consultation with a working group of State representatives,
determined that the Survey would be conducted for Categories I-IV
on a facility-by-facility basis as in 1976. A consultant firm,
Dames & Moore, was again competitively selected to augment the
manpower available within EPA and the States. Survey guidance was
prepared in conjunction with the States and discussed in detail
during meetings held with the States at EPA's regional offices.
All data from the 1976 Survey were pre-printed on the Survey re-
porting form as a starting point for the 1978 effort.
11
-------
Dames & Moore established its personnel in EPA's ten regional
offices in the Spring of 1978 and prepared estimates facility-by-
facility on the basis of information in regional and State files.
States were asked to review and comment on estimates and provide
assistance, subject to the constraint that adverse impact on the
progress of the Construction Grants Program should be avoided as
much as possible. Independent State estimates were recorded when
agreement between the State and EPA was not possible.
The completed estimates were approved by the State and EPA and
sent to Washington for a rigorous quality check and entry into a
computer file.
Table D shows the 1978 Survey results compared with the 1976
Survey. The results of the 1978 Survey track well with the 1976
results, given the volume of grants awarded and the inflation of
construction costs experienced between Surveys. The net result was
a decrease in needs of three percent for Categories I-V. The major
reasons for the differences in these estimates for Categories I-IV
are summarized below:
Reasons which decreased needs:
1. Categories I, II, and IVB (Treatment Plants and Inter-
ceptors) were substantially affected by the $14 billion of con-
struction grant funds obligated between the 1976 and 1978 Surveys.
The $14 billion included $10.5 billion in federal funds and $3.5
billion in local funds.
2. Needs in Category II (Treatment more Stringent than
Secondary) went down, causing a reduction in total treatment needs,
even though secondary treatment needs went up slightly. This
change was primarily caused by better reporting procedures and
better cost information on Category II facilities, and not a
reduction of the number of facilities with needs for treatment
levels higher than secondary.
3. The estimates for Categories IIIA and IIIB (Infiltration/
Inflow Correction and Major Sewer Rehabilitation) have been sub-
stantially reduced from the 1976 Survey, while the reporting rules
for these costs remained identical during the two surveys. The
changes were caused by more careful reporting of Category III
needs, the shift of some needs previously reported in Category III
to Category V, and the award of grants during the period between
Needs Surveys.
4. Category IVB needs (Interceptor Sewers) have been reduced
by 9 percent primarily due to grant awards made in 1976 and 1977.
12
-------
Table D - Comparison of 1978 Survey with 1976 Survey
(January, 1978 Dollars in Billions)
Needs Category 1978 Survey 1976 Needs $Diff %Diff
I (Secondary Treatment) 15.09 14.72 +.37 +3
II (More Stringent Treatment)
A. Secondary levels (10.2)
B. Advanced Secondary (6.8)
C. Advanced Treatment (3.5)
Total Category II 20.51 24.17 -3.66 -15
IIIA (Infiltration/Inflow) 2.44 3.43 -.99 -29
IIIB (Replacement and/or Rehabilitation) 4.88 6.23 -1.35 -22
IVA (New Collector Sewers) 19.02 19.29 .27 -1
IVB (New Interceptor Sewers) 18.47 20.36 -1.89 -9
V (Combined Sewer Overflow) 25.74 20.75 +4.99 +24
Total I - V 106.15 108.95 -2.80 -3
VI (Control of Stormwater) 61.67 61.49 +.18 +0.3
Total I - VI 167.82 170.44 -2.62 -2
-------
Reasons which increased needs:
1. All categories were substantially affected by general
inflation, estimated for Needs purposes at 6.8 percent per year.
Inflation effects are responsible for an estimated $13 billion rise
in needs.
2. The completion of a national facilities inventory for the
1978 Survey resulted in the addition of over 13,000 facilities,
almost all of which are very small facilities located in rural
areas. This increase was experienced because the inventory of
facilities was completed for the first time.
3. All needs were increased to some extent because the
future needs reporting date was changed from year 1990 to year
2000. This change brought the Needs Survey more in line with
existing planning efforts for wastewater facilities, and resulted
in an estimated increase of $4.3 billion in future needs.
4. New and improved historical cost data were used to generate
cost curves for use in the Survey which were substantially higher
in cost than previous curves. The improvement in the quality of
the curves, however, was significant as well.
B. Combined Sewer Overflow (Category V)
The 1978 Category V Needs are 24 percent higher than those
estimated in the 1976 Needs Survey, after adjustment for construction
cost increases since January 1, 1976. The primary reason for this
is the increase in the volume and accuracy of information sources
needed to make these estimates. The 320 urbanized areas surveyed
were studied as 1143 separate combined sewer areas in the 1978
Needs Survey.
EPA completed an inventory of combined sewer areas in the 1978
Needs Survey. The reported combined sewer acreage increased by 13
percent as a result. The distribution of combined sewer overflow
control needs shifted from 19 percent in non-urbanized areas in the
1976 Survey to 34 percent in 1978. This increase in reported non-
urbanized combined sewer areas affects costs significantly because
the average capital cost to control pollution from non-urbanized
areas is $15,896 per acre compared to $9,221 per acre for urbanized
areas
14
-------
Further, more detailed site studies were used to determine the
relationships between the costs to control pollution from combined
sewer areas and the data collected for each combined sewer area.
This more detailed consideration of the individual characteristics
of each combined sewer area is the major reason for the individual
State needs changes from the 1976 Survey.
C. Treatment and/or Control of Stormwater (Category VI)
The 1978 Category VI Needs are one-fourth of 1 percent higher
than those estimated in the 1976 Needs Survey, after adjustment for
construction cost increases since January 1, 1976.
Individual State needs differences are due to a more detailed
consideration of the individual characteristics of each urbanized
area when compared to the 1976 Needs Survey methodology.
V. QUALITY OF FACILITY ESTIMATES, CATEGORIES I-V
The reliability of the cost estimates is dependent upon many
factors. Highly accurate cost data can only be obtained if treatment
facilities have been planned and designed adequately to meet projected
water quality requirements. Also, cost estimation is related to the
ability to discern "historical" cost trends based upon actual treatment
plant cost experience. Accordingly, EPA studied a large number of
wastewater treatment plants employing a variety of treatment technologies.
Using these data, EPA developed cost estimating procedures which were
used in the cost estimation process when better quality data were not
available.
Actual recent cost experience was studied in sewer construction and
installation as well. EPA developed cost estimating procedures and
rules of thumb for pipe costs when better data were not available.
Supplementary to EPA supplied treatment and pipe cost estimating
procedures, differences in local construction costs were recognized by
the provision of cost multipliers for each area of the United States.
One multiplier was used when estimating treatment costs in each of
fifty-one areas, and the second multiplier was used for sewers in each
of thirty areas.
The cost estimates for Categories I, II and IVB (treatment plants
and interceptors) are considered most accurate because of the many years
of experience with these types of construction costs. Also, facilities
in these Categories have been subjected to the most rigorous planning
requirements.
15
-------
The cost estimates for Categories IIIA, IIIB, and V (infiltration/
inflow, rehabilitation and combined sewer overflow) are not considered
to be as accurate as those for the other Categories, but the estimates
are considered to have greatly improved.
Numerous infiltration/inflow studies and rules of thumb based on
experience to date have resulted in a substantial improvement in the
Category IIIA estimates. Estimating the repair cost of sewers which
defy routine inspection creates a weakness in Category IIIB estimates.
In addition, there are few instances nationwide where sewer replacement
is anticipated prior to actual sewer collapse, a relatively common
occurrence in older cities.
EPA accepted needs for infiltration/inflow correction and major
sewer rehabilitation only when they could be documented by facility
plans or engineering studies. Additional undocumented needs may exist
in many areas. Costs of correction of infiltration/inflow, however, can
be traded off against treatment costs. Major sewer rehabilitation may
in many cases be considered an ongoing operation and maintenance problem
as much as a capital need eligible for grants funds.
Category IVA (new collector sewers) cost estimates have improved
since 1976. The quality of estimates in this Category degrades quickly
as non-uniform assumptions concerning future populations are introduced.
Therefore, Category IVA needs were limited to include provision for
future populations of up to 1.5 times the 1972 population requiring new
sewers, in accordance with the rule of thumb used in the Construction
Grants Program. Even though this limitation provides much better and
more comparable eligible requirements for new collector sewers, it
implicitly provides new collector sewer capacity for a great deal of
future growth in vacant lots and on the fringes of communities in
existence in 1972. Careful and detailed analysis of local conditions,
as required in the facility planning process, would likely reduce the
collector sewers eligible for construction grants below what was reported
in the 1978 Survey. For this reason, the estimates in Category IVA, are
still considered high.
For Category V (control of combined sewer overflow), estimates are
difficult to make due to the variations in the size, number and frequency
of combined sewer overflows, the characteristics of the receiving waters,
and many other factors. A substantial amount of study and research has
been conducted on how much and what type of control of combined sewer
overflow are required under varying conditions. In addition, the Agency
constructed a complete inventory of combined sewer areas in the United
States which provided more accurate data about each combined sewer area
and its receiving waters. The results of this work were incorporated in
the model used in estimating needs for Category V, and the reported
16
-------
costs are considered more comparable and reliable than in 1976. Several
major improvements were made to the model, including a continous rainfall
simulation and the establishment of wet-weather water quality criteria,
which traditionally have not been available. The shortcoming of this
approach was that in many cases, important physical data about local
conditions such as the number and location of overflow points and
receiving water characteristics, were not available in national studies
or data files, and therefore were estimated using a rule of thumb based
on experience. The results, therefore, are not considered highly accurate
for individual cities, although the State and national estimates are
considered of good quality.
An important consideration for the entire discussion of the quality
of cost estimates is the substantial -upgrading of the quality of technical
data supporting costs in this Survey, compared to prior Surveys. These
data are significantly improved and are being published concurrently
with this report. The reasons for this improvement are the work of the
contractors, and the existence of many new planning documents not previously
completed.
Based on the data collected in the 1978 inventory of combined sewer
areas, facility plans have been completed for communities with 21 percent
of the Nation's combined sewer acreage. Some fraction of these plans,
however, may address only the dry weather component of the water pollution
problem.
VI. QUALITY OF CATEGORY VI ESTIMATES
For Category VI (control of stormwater), the cost estimating methods
are tentative at best. EPA estimates are based on a uniform methodology
which incorporates the latest thinking in the field. The state of the
art for control of stormwater is not nearly as advanced as that for
dealing with combined sewer overflow. Although further research may
indicate different approaches with substantially different costs are
more appropriate than those utilized for the 1976 and 1978 Surveys, the
1976 and 1978 results are considered a much better approximation of
stormwater pollution control costs than previous estimates.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
The 1978 Needs Survey is the best estimate available of the nationwide
costs of compliance with the goals of the Clean Water Act of 1977. It
is clear from the 1978 Needs Survey that in order to meet the water
quality goals of the Act, a substantial amount of public monies will be
required. For the second time in a Needs Survey, the effects of the
public funds spent to date are noticeable in Categories I, II and IV.
17
-------
VIII. FUTURE NEEDS SURVEYS
Because of the lead time required, planning for the 1980 Needs
Survey is already in the formative stages. Our assessment is that the
1980 Needs Survey will require a smaller field effort than prior surveys,
and will become a more continuous process than the condensed field
estimation period required by prior Surveys.
18
-------
APPENDIX A
CONDUCT OF THE SURVEY
I. CATEGORIES I-IV (Treatment Plants and Sewers)
A. Background
Drawing on the experience of prior Surveys, EPA and the States
formed a working group to determine the strategy for the conduct of
the 1978 Survey. Several Survey goals were identified by the
group:
1. That the Survey identify and quantify all needs.
2. That the conduct of the Survey be nationally uniform.
3. That the utilization of scarce State personnel and
dollar resources for the Survey be minimized.
4. That a complete inventory of municipal wastewater
facilities be compiled.
The Survey approach taken for Categories I-IV (treatment
plants and sewers) as a result of these recommendations was:
1. An independent consultant, paid by EPA, would conduct the
Survey on a facility-by-facility basis for Categories I-IV.
The consultant's personnel were to be based in EPA regional
offices, but would visit State and local offices as required
to formulate cost estimates. The engineering firm of Dames
and Moore, with Headquarters in Los Angeles, California, and
company resources sufficient for this large effort, was
competitively selected.
2. Survey guidance and methodology were formulated for
Categories I-IV in draft, and circulated to all parties
involved in the Survey. State comments were solicited, and
final guidance was issued which reflected those comments.
3. While national uniformity of estimating procedures was a
Survey goal, the cost and construction differences inherent to
various sections of the country were recognized and accommodated.
A-l
-------
The formal Survey of Categories I-IV began with orientation
meetings conducted in EPA regional offices where logistics, target
dates, and individual State problems were discussed and resolved.
States were asked only to provide as much investment in personnel
for the Survey as they considered prudent; but were invited to
participate fully in the formal Survey field work.
The Survey field work was conducted in the spring, summer, and
fall of 1978. At the same time work on Categories V and VI was
undertaken by a second consultant, Black, Crow, and Eidsness (now
a part of CH2M Hill).
As estimates for Categories I-IV were completed, copies of the
estimates were reviewed by States on a facility-by-facility basis.
When cost agreement between EPA and State personnel could not be
reached, separate estimates were submitted by States and have been
included in this report.
Facility estimates were reviewed and accepted and/or approved
at four levels: 1) contractor, 2) EPA Regional Office, 3) State,
and 4) EPA Headquarters.
After machine preparation, data for Categories I-IV were
summarized for this report.
B. Survey Methodology - Operational Guidance for Categories I-IV
Participant guidance for the Survey was formulated by EPA, the
States, and the consultant working closely together. This document
included the following subjects:
1. Responsibilities of the participants.
2. Target dates for project milestones including the calendar
for the Survey and the consultant's contractual obligations.
3. Descriptions of all data sources to be provided to participants
to aid in completion of the Survey.
4. Briefing schedules for the participants.
5. Provisions for State and Regional review of consultants
data prior to finalization.
A-2
-------
6. Definitions of terms for needs purposes. Standards were
established for definitions of secondary treatment, design
year, units of measurement, cost estimating, basis of cost
estimate, design flows, and infiltration/inflow reporting.
7. Specific guidelines for completing Survey forms.
8. EPA adjustments to the 1976 Needs data base prior to its
use as a starting point in 1978.
9. Cost estimating procedures to be used when more reliable
local procedures were not available. These included estimating
procedures for treatment costs and new sewers, with factors
provided for determination of cost variation in any of fifty-
one areas in the vicinity of major cities in the United States.
10. Interceptor sewer sizing tables.
As a result of meetings and other communications with all
the States, the guidance was supplemented by request to include:
1. "Rules of Thumb" for estimating needs based on best
engineering judgment. All of the participants understood that
rules of thumb would be used only when better information was
not available. Examples are:
a. Per capita domestic and commercial flows were allowed
consistent with the cost effective regulations.
b. Collector and interceptor lengths were limited to
sixteen feet and one foot per capita, respectively, of unsewered
population.
2. A procedure for designating the basis of cost estimates.
3. Additional cost data, showing national capital costs for:
a. chlorination facilities
b. pumping stations
c. filtration systems
d. aerated lagoons and waste stabilization ponds
e. phosphorus removal
A-3
-------
4. Procedures for estimating backlog needs for all Categories.
5. Instructions for reconciliation of populations.
6. Guidance for estimation of collector sewer costs.
7. Information on grant eligibilities for land costs.
8. Guidance for estimation of I/I analysis costs.
9. Small and individual treatment systems.
C. Basis of Cost Estimate for Categories I-IV
All individual cost estimates made in Categories I-IV of the
Survey were to be accompanied with a basis of cost estimate, so
that the quality of the estimate can be better determined. EPA has
determined that the quality of cost estimates can be ranked from
high to low as follows:
1. Engineer/Consultant Firm Estimate
2. Engineer/Consultant Preliminary Estimate
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
4. Cost of Previous Comparable Construction
5. EPA Supplied Cost Estimating Procedures
6. Rough Estimates
Table 44 shows the percent of State needs reported by basis
of estimate. Table 45 shows the relative quality of estimates by
Needs Survey Category. Note that three bases of estimate (State
Certification, Analysis Completed, and Evaluation Survey Completed),
refer to Category III (infiltration/inflow correction and major
sewer rehabilitation) needs only, and have no application to other
Categories.
These tables show that the quality of the cost estimates made
in the 1978 Survey is substantially higher than in 1976, when
27 percent of needs used rough estimates or no basis of estimate.
A-4
-------
D. Data Sources for Categories I-IV
1. The types of data needed in the Survey and the sources
used to access these data were many. The major types of data
used were:
a. population (year 2000 and present)
b. total flow (average, current design and projected
year 2000 design)
c. industrial flow (average, current design and projected
year 2000 design)
d. biological oxygen demand and suspended solids con-
centrations (average, current design and
projected 2000 design)
e. nitrogen and phosphorus removal requirements (average,
current design and projected 2000 design)
f. treatment methods
g. sludge handling and treatment methods
h. level of treatment required
2. The sources of these data were:
a. 1976 Needs Survey data
b. NPDES Applications and Permits
c. Grant Application files
d. Grant Files and Grant Information Control System Data
e. Regional and/or Basin Plans (201, 208 and 303 plans)
f. Other Engineering Plans or Reports
g. State Water Quality Standards.
A-5
-------
E. Survey Preparation
The 1978 Survey form was generated by computer showing the
1976 Data of Record for each facility. Once the revised cost
estimates were recorded on Survey forms for each facility, copies
of the completed forms were provided for all parties participating
in the Survey, primarily for State review and revision. The forms
were then used to record the updated 1978 Needs Survey figures.
Census data for 1977 and BEA 2000 population projections were
used as State ceilings. State population totals were not permitted
to exceed these ceilings.
As burvey forms were completed, they were double checked by
EPA for the accuracy of the data collected and submitted. Each
State was then given the opportunity to review and comment upon the
revised data shown on Survey forms, and to review the total cost
estimates for the State.
Where differences over cost estimates were not resolved,
States submitted independent cost estimates on the form. Few
independent State estimates were required.
II. CATEGORIES V-VI (Control of Combined Sewer Overflow and Stormwater)
A. Background
Category V and VI estimates were derived from a computer cost
model as in the 1976 Needs Survey with two significant improvements
which were:
1. Substantial upgrading of the model to reflect the current
state of the art.
2. Compilation of a complete inventory of combined sewer
areas.
The consultant firm of Black, Crow and Eidsness was competi-
tively hired to upgrade the model for Categories V & VI. Dames &
Moore was given the task of compiling the inventory of combined
sewer areas.
Information collected for the inventory included:
1. Location
2. Sewer system characteristics
3. Receiving water characteristics
4. Status of CSO correction planning
A-6
-------
Sources of data for this information were:
1. State and local engineering reports
2. United States Geological Survey
3. National Combined Sewer System Data File
Data collection and model upgrading and analyses for Categories
V & VI were conducted concurrently with the work for Categories I-
IV.
In November, 1978, a draft of the results of the Category V &
VI work was mailed to States with a request for review. Substantial
changes were made to the model and the data base as a result of
comments from the States.
B. Survey Methodology for Category V (Combined Sewer Overflow)
The methodology for estimating the cost to control combined
sewer overflow to prevent periodic bypassing of untreated wastes
from combined sewers was based on eight major factors. These
factors were studied in fifteen cities in the United States selected
because of their diverse wet weather conditions and the availability
of good data. Data generated by the fifteen site studies were used
to develop an estimate of the time water quality criteria would be
violated. The estimate is based on a model which included all
sources of pollution during dry and wet weather, and flow, quality,
and reaeration capacity of the receiving water.
Similarly, data generated by the fifteen site studies were
also used to determine the lowest cost combination of stormwater
and combined sewer overflow control to meet receiving water criteria.
Further, from data generated by the fifteen site studies, an
optimum mix of pollutant control technologies was developed for
combined and separate or non-sewered areas for a range of required
BOD and suspended solids removal efficiencies.
These relationships were applied to each of the 320 urbanized
areas, or State portions of urbanized areas. These relationships
were also applied to the combined sewer areas outside of urbanized
areas utilizing State average data for some variables where necessary.
In total, 1143 combined sewer areas were studied.
A-7
-------
The eight major factors which affect Category V costs are as
follows:
1. Pollutants to be Controlled.
The pollutants for which reasonable estimates of pollutant
washoff and receiving water impact may be developed include:
suspended solids, carbonaceous BOD, nitrogenous BOD, total
phosphorus (for lakes), and fecal coliforms. For other materials
such as pesticides or heavy metals not enough is known about
their occurrence in the urban system to evaluate potential
impacts.
2. Water Quality Criteria.
The water quality criteria applied to delineate the
assimilative capacity of a receiving water are as follows:
a. Suspended solids.
The mean value of suspended solids concentration discharged
to the receiving water from urban stormwater and combined
sewer overflow sources should not exceed the mean value of the
natural background suspended solids concentration for the
subject receiving water on an annual basis. This criteria
applies except in cases where the allowable mean value of
suspended solids concentration is less than 25 mg/1. In this
case a discharge limit of 25 mg/1 shall apply.
b. Dissolved oxygen.
The minimum receiving water dissolved oxygen concentration
shall not average less than 2.0 mg/1 for more than 4 consecutive
hours; nor shall the minimum receiving water dissolved oxygen
concentration average less than 3.0 mg/1 for more than 72
consecutive hours (3 days). In addition, the annual average
receiving water dissolved oxygen concentration shall be greater
than 5.0 mg/1 for all waters which will support warm water
species and shall be greater than 6.0 mg/1 for all waters
which will support cold water species.
c. Dissolved lead.
The mean in-stream 96 hour (time averaged) dissolved lead
concentration should not exceed 0.330 mg/1. The long term
mean in-stream dissolved lead concentration should not exceed
0.010 mg/1 in soft waters (hardness less than 100 mg/1) or
0.025 mg/1 in hard waters (hardness greater than 100 mg/1.)
A-8
-------
d. Phosphorus.
Average annual lake phosphorus concentration should not
exceed 0.025 mg/1.
e. Fecal coliforms
Two untreated overflow events per year shall not be
exceeded
3. Cost of Alternative Technologies.
An optimum combination of control technologies is cal-
culated for each combined sewer area. Streetsweeping and
combined sewer flushing are employed at all treatment levels
after calculation of the optimum level of efforts for these
management practices. If these levels of removal are insuffi-
cient to satisfy the total required removal, the remainder
must be removed by a storage/treatment system. The optimum
treatment level, (see Tables A-l and A-2) is a function of the
removal required from the storage/treatment system, the pol-
lutant type (BOD or suspended solids) and the sewer system
type (separate or combined). After the optimum treatment
level is selected, the optimum combination of storage volume
and treatment rate is calculated.
4. Pollutant Sources from Dry Weather Flows.
The pollutant loadings from municipal dry weather sources
are assumed to meet 1983 secondary treatment requirements. It
is assumed that each population equivalent contributes the
following:
a. BOD = 3U mg/1
SS - 30 mg/1
TKN = 28 mg/1
Pb = 0.04 mg/1
b. 100 gallons per capita of wastewater per day
5. Pollutant Loads from Wet Weather Sources.
It was assummed that oxygen-demanding materials (i.e. BOD
and TKN) will reach maximum accumulation in fifteen days and
that non-oxygen demanding material (i.e. suspended solids and
lead) accumulate in a linear fashion. Pollutant accumulation
rates were calculated from the Stormwater Management Model
Level 1 equations.
A-9
-------
6. Tolerance of Aquatic Species
The receiving water quality criteria established for the
Survey take into account the pollution tolerance of aquatic
species. These tolerances were considered for both short-term
and long-term exposure to pollutants.
For additional bacteriological cleanup in combined sewer
overflow and urban runoff beyond that required for protection
of fish and wildlife, the storage capacity and the treatment
rate were increased so that the number of overflow events were
limited to two per year, which is comparable to allowable
violation standards for dry weather.
7. Pollutant Control Levels Required
Each combined sewer area has differing receiving water
characteristics which affect pollution control costs sub-
stantially. The degree to which pollutant control is required
is a function of the overall assimilative stream capacity
resulting from the receiving water characteristics.
The factors which led to the determination of required
control levels in each combined sewer area are the upstream
flow and quality, the combined sewer overflow, urban storm
runoff, the wastewater treatment plant effluent quality, and
the receiving water flow.
8. Types and Costs of Alternatives Necessary to meet Receiving
Water Criteria
Table A-l below shows the nationwide distribution of
combined sewer overflow treatment levels required to meet the
recreational water quality criteria described, while taking
into account both the annual and short-term assimilative
capacity of the receiving waters. This table does not show
the treatment levels required in combined sewer areas outside
of urbanized areas.
C. Survey Methodology Category VI (Stormwater Control).
The methodology for estimating the cost to provide control
and/or treatment of urban stormwater runoff channeled through
sewers or other conveyances used only for such runoff is based
on the same eight major factors and fifteen site studies as
the Category V cost estimation methodology.
A-10
-------
The cost estimates by State (and Territory) are based on
regulations for the application of the NPDES Permit Program for
separate storm sewers which were published in the Federal Register
of March 18, 1976. In these regulations, the term "separate storm
sewer" is defined as "a conveyance or system of conveyances . . .
located in an urbanized area and primarily operated for the purpose
of collecting and conveying stormwater runoff." In accordance with
this guideline, the geographical areas which require control and/or
treatment of stormwater runoff are urbanized areas of the Nation as
defined by the U.S. Bureau of Census. The specific criteria for
the delineation of an urbanized area is as follows:
1. A central city of 50,000 inhabitants or more, or twin
cities with a combined population of at least 50,000, and with the
smaller of the twin cities having a population of at least 15,000;
and
2. Surrounding closely settled territory.
The eight major factors which affect Category VI cost estimates
are the same as for Category V, except that sewer flushing was
eliminated as an alternative technology.
Table A-2 below snows the nationwide distribution of combined sewer
overflow treatment levels required to meet the dissolved water quality
criteria described, while taking into account both the annual and short
term assimilative capacity of the receiving waters.
A-ll
-------
TABLE A-l
TREATMENT LEVEL REQUIRED FOR RECREATION PROTECTION
IN COMBINED SEWER AREAS*
CAPITAL COST
IN MILLIONS AREA
TREATMENT LEVEL OF 1978 $ IN ACRES POPULATION
1 = STORAGE -0- -0- -0-
2 = 1 + MICROSCREEN 514 68,191 620,184
3=2+ SEDIMENTATION - FLOCCULATION 6,738 817,148 9,302,403
4=3+ HIGH RATE FILTRATION 4,859 534,465 12,814,696
5=4+ DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION 5,844 527,362 10,978.767
17,955 1,947,166 33,716,050
*IN URBANIZED AREAS ONLY
-------
TABLE A-2
TREATMENT LEVEL REQUIRED FOR RECREATION PROTECTION
IN STORM SEWERED AND NON-SEWERED AREAS* YEAR 2000*
CAPITAL COST
IN MILLIONS AREA
TREATMENT LEVEL OF 1978 $ IN ACRES POPULATION
1 = STORAGE -0- -0- -0-
2 = 1 + MICROSCREEN 18,601 12,309,494 41,385,274
3=>
£ 3=2+ SEDIMENTATION - FLOCCULATION 7,895 4,193,103 14,702,036
4=3+ HIGH RATE FILTRATION 35,174 15,741,459 74,340,124
5=4+ DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION -0- -0- -0-
61,670 32,244,056 130,427,434
*IN URBANIZED AREAS ONLY
-------
Appendix B
Reasons for Independent State Estimates
Categories I-VI
Prior to finalization of estimates, all Survey forms were sent to
States for review and comment. States were encouraged to provide as
much input as possible to secure the best available estimates. Where
EPA and State estimates differed, an attempt was made to resolve the
differences. To secure the most accurate and nationally consistent cost
estimates, adherence to the Survey guidelines and rules of thumb as
formulated by the EPA/State Needs Survey Working Group was enforced.
Where agreement on specific estimates could not be reached between EPA
and State personnel, separate estimates were submitted by States.
Of approximately 155,000 possible estimates, 1,267 separate estimates
representing 758 Survey forms were submitted by States. Most of these
estimates were based on State-developed cost curves or State population
projections exceeding allowable ceilings. Other reasons for separate
estimates include disagreement on allocation of dollars between Categories
I-IV versus Category V, inclusion of ineligible facilities, and differing
inflation factors.
The State of California submitted an independent estimate for
Category V of $1,186,676,000 for control of pollution from combined
sewer overflows. The EPA estimate, before adjustment for $125,000,000
of met needs, is $272,621,000. On a per acre of combined sewer area
basis the State and EPA estimates respectively are 31,146 $/acre and
7,155 $/acre. For comparison purposes, the national average cost estimated
by EPA to control pollution from combined sewer overflows is $10,752 per
acre. The estimate presented by the State of California is approximately
three times this national average cost. Most of this difference is due
to the cost estimates for the city of San Francisco.
The differences between the EPA and State estimate for San Francisco
result largely from different assumptions on appropriate control techno-
logy, in particular the optimal mix of storage and treatment capacity.
EPA's estimate is derived from the model which is based on an intensive
analysis of available research and other information on control technologies
and the 15 site studies.
The model provides the advantage of producing needs estimates which
are comparable among the States and based on reasonable and common
assumptions. It is unlikely to provide the same answer in every city as
would detailed facility planning. We understand, however, that San
Francisco and the State of California have been considering revisions
which would bring their current estimate of needs for San Francisco
closer to the EPA estimate.
B-l
-------
Given the objective of achieving comparable estimates among the
States and the uncertainty of the State and local estimates for San
Francisco, EPA has reported California's estimate as an independent
State estimate but not as an EPA estimate.
The State of Vermont submitted an independent estimate for Category VI
amounting to $30,824,000 for control of pollution from stormwater in
fourteen communities. The EPA estimate is zero because the Needs Survey
for Category VI covers only "census-defined urbanized areas," Vermont
has no "census-defined urbanized areas." Regulations for the application
of the NPDES Program to separate storm sewers were published in the
Federal Register of March 18, 1976. This document and the permit program
it established were utilized to determine the areas requiring needs in
Category VI. The regulations defined the term separate storm sewer as a
"a conveyance or system of conveyances ... located in an urbanized area
and primarily operated for the purpose of collecting and conveying
stormwater runoff."
The NPDES permit issuing authority may designate other storm sewers
as being significant contributors of pollution and thus subject to these
regulations. In absence of specific designation, stormwater needs are
estimated for census-defined urbanized areas only.
However, this restriction is under active discussion in EPA, and
may be subject to regulatory change allowing a more liberal interpretation
of storm sewers in the future.
B-2
-------
APPENDIX C
SUMMARY TABLES
Cost data from the 1978 Needs Survey are presented in summary
tables included in this Appendix. The following tables show costs
by State and U. S. totals:
Table 1 -
Table 2 -
Table 3 -
Table 4 -
Table 5 -
Table 6 -
Table 7 -
Table 8 -
Table 9 -
Table 10 -
Table 11 -
Table 12 -
Table 13 -
Table 14 -
EPA Assessments of Needs by Category.
Independent State Estimates of Needs by Category.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments,
Categories I-V.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Treatment Plants, Categories I and II.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Categories I, II, and IVB.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category I.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category II.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category IIIA.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category 11 IB.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category IVA.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category IVB.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category V.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Assessments for
Category VI.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Categories I-V.
C-l
-------
Table 15 -
Table 16 -
Table 17 -
Table 18 -
Table 19 -
Table 20 -
Table 21 -
Table 22 -
Table 23 -
Table 24 -
Table 25 -
Table 26 -
Table 27 -
Table 28 -
Table 29 -
Table 30 -
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Categories I, II, and IVB.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category I.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category II.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category IIIA.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category IIIB.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category IVA.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category IVB.
Per Capita Costs for year 2000 and Present
Population, Category V.
Comparison of 1978 and 1976 EPA Per Capita Assessments,
Categories I-V.
Comparison of 1978 EPA Assessments with State
Estimates for Categories I-V.
Comparison of Per Capita Differences Between the
EPA and State Estimates, Categories I-V.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Categories I and II.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Categories I, II, and IVB.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category I
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category II.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category IIIA.
C-2
-------
Table 31 -
Table 32 -
Table 33 -
Table 34 -
Table 35 -
Table 36 -
Table 37 -
Table 38 -
Table 39 -
Table 40 -
Table 41 -
Table 42 -
Table 43 -
Table 44 -
Table 45 -
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category IIIB.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category IVA.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category IVB.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category V.
Comparison of 1978 EPA and State Estimates,
Category VI.
Needs for Current Populations (Backlog),
Categories I-VI.
Comparison of Year 2000 and Backlog Needs,
Categories I-V.
Comparison of Year 2000 and Backlog Needs,
Categories I and II.
Comparison of Year 2000 and Backlog Needs,
Categories I, II, and IVB.
Per Capita Backlog of Needs, Categories I-V.
Per Capita Backlog of Needs,
Categories I, II, and IVB.
Number of EPA Assessments by Category
Number of State Cost Estimates Differing from
EPA Estimates
Percent of State Meeds by Basis of Cost Estimate
Percent of National Needs by Basis of Cost Estimate
C-3
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 1
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
EPA ASSESSMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION DF PUBL1CLY-OHNED HASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
MILLIONS OF 1978 DOLLARS
TOTAL
CATEGORIES _I_IUBU_i_
II III A III B
IV A
IV B
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
HIST. OF CQLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RJCO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 106,153 15,390 20,507
NOTE: SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EBUAL TOTALS DUE TO RDUND-OFFS
947
515
512
501
8,041
948
1 ,383
389
186
4,976
1,755
859
446
4,105
4,205
1,096
1,103
2,085
1,136
1,638
2,910
3,426
4,485
1,347
774
2,535
125
317
260
1,154
4,196
158
14,156
1,657
B2
6,777
572
1,536
5,358
945
840
207
1,757
3,110
399
460
2,008
2,761
1,845
1,797
75
57
44
56
977
90
44
150
333
182
65
2,691
236
207
0
0
468
126
330
79
86
46
181
294
84
405
121
20
776
171
12
55
779
37
159
65
197
924
62
2,393
149
48
86
33
21
506
144
158
43
168
4
6
4*
439
590
271
100
49
22
38
17
336
41
16
195
5
9
171
1,979
316
139
94
15
1,405
541
11
98
1,293
536
316
123
373
57
22
843
250
976
705
260
23
6
2
121
95
866
20
1,291
456
0
1,656
212
403
1,132
96
63
99
387
1,214
230
85
328
192
113
636
3
0
1
0
20
0
0
66
30
1
29
75
10
31
2
0
70
78
0
14
144
36
BO
48
Tt
45
13
7
3
43
28
98
59
2
1
1
6
137
0
103
67
0
256
36
51
10
10
51
3
124
21*
40
2
11
83
1
75
7
0
0
0
14
0
0
2
0
0
2
84
90
18
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
15
0
16
0
12
14
1,347
61
32
12
0
7
1
0
0
16
1
1
2,762
0
1
8
20
38
0
2
0
1
0
67
0
10
1
60
0
143
0
1
0
0
9
0
0
331
40
118
134
1,415
28
405
41
0
1,560
378
198
112
162
338
123
121
575
320
220
221
754
987
153
157
228
23
32
3B
269
655
42
2,436
479
3
683
139
287
982
260
314
5
512
566
61
77
43B
460
514
269
1
9
0
17
257
32
11
180
95
199
99
1,627
266
182
120
0
1,462
410
319
84
282
311
201
289
385
294
154
323
543
671
247
168
67B
20
50
33
295
601
32
1,863
438
14
825
129
301
529
100
251
29
365
1,002
57
31
515
481
189
301
9
23
3
21
320
15
16
0
9
0
0
167
0
398
128
170
8
218
0
57
2,131
2,920
192
209
592
0
1,092
147
1 ,036
1,602
187
33
757
33
70
0
272
1,009
0
3,305
67
13
3,261
0
431
2,198
329
0
24
198
39
2
2 OP
272
893
754
268
3
0
0
0
19
0
0
2,437
4,877
19,022
IB,474
25,742
-------
FEBRUARY lOi 1979
TABLE 2
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
STATE ESTIMATES FDR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED WASTEHATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
MILLIONS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES _I_LHEU_X_
TOTAL
II
III A
III 6
IV A
IV B
ALABAHA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OIST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAMAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOMA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXiS
UIAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST V1RGIMA
WISCONSIN
WYOKING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAK
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TKRR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 109,087 15,17* 21,779
NOTE: SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EOUAL. TOTALS DUE TO RQUND-OFFS
947
515
512
501
9,060
948
1,383
390
196
4,976
1,755
B59
446
4,224
4,205
1,096
1,103
2,085
1,136
1,638
3,059
3,426
4,639
1,351
774
2,535
125
317
282
1,154
4,196
158
15,146
1.657
82
6,777
572
1,536
5,391
945
840
212
1,757
3,110
399
461
2,008
2,848
1.846
2,123
75
57
44
56
987
90
44
150
333
182
65
2,691
236
207
0
0
468
126
330
79
86
46
181
294
84
405
121
21
776
173
16
55
779
37
159
76
197
924
62
2,432
149
48
86
33
21
52B
144
158
44
168
4
6
44
439
590
271
98
49
22
38
17
339
41
16
195
5
9
171
1,979
316
139
94
15
1,405
541
11
98
1,411
536
316
123
373
57
22
926
250
1,043
705
260
23
6
2
121
95
866
20
2,024
456
0
1,656
212
403
1,137
96
63
99
387
1,214
230
86
328
192
113
900
3
0
1
0
20
0
0
86
30
1
29
75
10
31
2
0
70
78
0
14
144
36
80
48
74
45
13
7
3
69
28
98
59
2
1
I
6
137
0
108
67
0
256
36
51
10
10
51
3
124
214
40
2
11
170
2
78
7
a
0
0
14
0
0
2
0
0
2
84
90
18
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
15
0
16
0
12
14
1,347
61
81
12
0
7
1
0
0
16
1
1
2,762
0
1
B
20
38
0
2
0
1
0
67
0
10
1
60
0
159
0
1
0
0
9
0
0
331
40
118
134
1,415
28
405
41
0
1,560
378
198
112
162
338
123
121
575
320
220
223
754
993
153
157
2 26
23
32
3B
269
655
42
2,576
479
3
683
139
287
985
260
314
8
512
566
61
77
438
460
514
282
1
9
0
17
257
32
11
180
95
199
99
1,627
266
182
121
0
1.462
410
319
84
283
311
201
289
385
294
154
395
543
676
247
168
67B
20
50
44
295
601
32
1,936
438
14
825
129
301
532
100
251
31
365
1.002
57
31
515
4B1
189
335
9
23
3
21
326
15
16
0
9
0
0
1.186
0
39B
128
170
8
218
0
57
2,131
2.920
192
209
592
0
1,092
147
1,036
1.602
187
33
757
33
70
0
272
1.009
0
3,305
67
13
3,261
0
431
2,198
329
0
24
198
39
2
208
272
893
75*
268
3
0
0
0
19
0
0
2,557
4,941
19,189
18,683
26,761
-------
FEBRUARY 1O, 1979
TABLE 3
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FDR CONSTRUCTION DF PUBLICtY-OMNED tIASTEHATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES l_IUBQU£H_i
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OKA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
983,473
371,875
520,932
588,251
6,298.173
792,199
1.446,461
306,628
257,928
4,233,437
1,857,904
855,026
496,504
6,095,555
3,594.601
1.176.748
771,395
1.457,536
803,257
1,093,149
3,309,029
3.862,888
5,831,375
1,829,455
852,366
2,942,420
144,158
465,497
301,300
1,183,108
3,695,315
168,476
16,488,269
1,378,404
83,265
9,170,306
587,124
1,570,773
4,324,092
621,190
1,087,405
156,371
1,453,449
3,197,223
307,145
441,731
1,798,570
2,271,194
2,481,475
2,245,665
76,494
68,090
81,338
C
1,046,376
170,644
52,032
£0.515.
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
947,377
515,777
512,875
501,930
8,041,449
948,828
1,383,067
389,310
186,077
4,976,527
1,755,995
859,176
446,643
4,105,836
4,205,646
1,096,588
1,103,188
2,085,385
1,136,873
1,638.839
,2,910,164
3,426,945
4,485,332
1,347,694
774,969
2,535,324
125,986
317,681
260,076
1,154,711
4,196,374
156,752
14,156,469
1,657,975
82,352
6,777,949
572,101
1,536,102
5,358,454
945,772
840,375
207,041
1,757,853
3,110,742
399,396
460,989
2,008,651
2t 761, 303
1,845,897
1,797,595
75,094
57,318
44,668
56,322
977,206
90,287
44,120
CHANGE
-36,096
+143,902
-8,057
-86,321
+1,743,276
+156,629
-63,394
+82,682
-71,851
+743,090
-101,909
+4,150
-49,861
-1.989,719
+611,045
-80,160
+331,793
+627,849
+333,606
+545,690
-398,865
-435,943
-1,346,043
-481,761
-77,397
-407,096
-18,172
-147,816
-41,222
-28,397
+501,059
-9,724
-2,331,800
+279,571
-913
-1,392,357
-15,023
-34,671
+1,034,362
+124,582
-247,030
+50,670
+304,404
-86,481
+92,251
+ 19,258
+210,031
+490,109
-635,578
-445,070
-1,400
-10,772
-36,430
+56,322
-69,170
-80,357
-7,912
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
0.9027
0.3413
0.4781
0.5399
5.7810
0.7271
1.3276
0.2814
0.2367
3.8858
1 . 7053
0.7848
0.4557
5.5950
3.2994
1.0801
0.7080
1.3378
0.7373
1.0033
3.0373
3.5457
5.3525
1.6792
0.7823
2.7008
0.1323
0.4272
0.2765
1.0859
3.3919
0.1546
15.1344
1.2652
0.0764
7.4994
0.5389
1.4418
3.9690
0.7537
0.9981
0.1435
1.3341
2.9347
0.2819
0.4054
1.6508
2.0847
2.2777
2.0612
0.0702
0.0624
0.0746
0.0000
0.9604
0.1566
0.0477
MJAGF OF NA.X.IQJ
I97B EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.8924
0.4858
0.4B31
0.4728
7.5752
0.8938
1.302B
0.3667
0.1752
4.68BO
1.6542
0.8093
0.4207
3.8678
3.9618
1.0330
1.0392
1.9644
1.0709
1.5438
2.7414
3.2282
4.2253
1.2695
0.7300
2.3883
0.1186
0.2992
0.2450
1.0877
3.9531
0.1495
13.3358
1.5618
0.0775
6.3850
0.5389
1.4470
5.0478
0.8909
0.7916
0.1950
1.6559
2.9304
0.3762
0.4342
1.8922
2.6012
1.7388
1.6933
0.0707
0.0539
0.0422
0.0530
0.9205
0.0850
0.0415
CHANGE
-0.0102
+0.1445
+0.0049
-0.0671
+1.7942
+0.1666
-0.0248
+0.0852
-0.0614
+0.6022
-0.0511
+0.0245
-0.0349
-1.7272
+0.6623
-0.0471
+0.3311
+0.6266
+0.3336
+0.5404
-0.2958
-0.3174
-1.1272
-0.4096
-0.0523
-0.3124
-0.0136
-0.1280
-0.0315
+0.0018
+0.5612
-0.0050
-1.7966
+0.2966
+0.0011
-1.1144
+0.0000
+0.0052
+1.0787
+0.1371
-0.2064
+0.0515
+0.3218
-0.0042
+0.0943
+0.0288
+0.2413
+0.5165
-0.5388
-0.3678
+0.0005
-0.0085
-0.0324
+0.0530
-0.0399
-0.0715
-0.0061
U.S. TOTALS
108,945,224 106,153,617 -2,791,607
100.0000
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE
-------
FC-BRUAKY 10,
1APLE S
1979
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF CQLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOW4
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
HINNESQTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NFW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
NEW Y3RK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHDBE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUA1
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
197IJ NECDS SURVEY
tnSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NtCDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED ^ASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES I, II AND IVB
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
671,173
288,316
401,308
388,320
4,794,269
486,024
427,993
218,513
22,439
2,822,545
1,228,091
708.B36
360,326
2,595,390
1 ,378,679
904,2*3
521,817
976,169
565,452
316,247
1,879,108
1,846,825
2,162,763
1,342,445
665,140
1,271,473
115,158
277,522
251,867
575,733
2,382,771
136,309
6,734,930
1,145,000
60,570
3,935,618
459,934
884,162
2,273,351
248,770
851,942
146,159
835,847
2,344,999
219,422
160,706
1,264,004
1,159,578
1,276,639
1,206,184
73,599
57,183
45,582
0
727,667
130,069
24,675
C.QSIS
1978 EP*
ASSESSMENT
526,726
434,801
391,988
336,032
6,299,037
618,942
528,924
215,329
15,406
3,336,469
1,078,898
661.083
262,092
1,662,739
894,090
699,896
707,336
8,43,245
757,777
298,397
1 ,186,807
1,570,084
1,819,075
966,286
485,110
1,481,430
64,776
213,216
220,165
588,907
2,391,934
114,742
5,548,236
1,043,637
63,007
2,568,231
375,263
726,586
2,167,295
342,523
473,780
172, 94B
922,396
2,222,232
295,048
161,295
1,283,539
1,263,901
574,616
1,038,760
62,823
46,684
43,266
38,330
676,612
57,504
32,702
EERCENIAGJL QE ts&IlD!
CHANGE
-144,447
+146,485
-9,320
-52,288
+ 1 ,504,768
+332,918
+100,931
-3,134
-7,033
+ 513,924
-149,193
-47,753
-98,234
-933,651
-484,539
-204,347
+185,519
-132,924
+192,295
-17,850
-692,301
-276,741
-343,638
-376,159
-180,030
+209,957
-50,332
-64,306
-31,702
+ 13,174
+9,163
-21,557
-1,186,694
-101,363
+2,437
-1,367,337
-84,641
-157,576
-106,066
+93,753
-378,162
+26,789
+86,551
-122,767
+ 75,626
+589
+19,535
+104,323
-701,993
-167,424
-10,776
-10,499
-2,316
+38,330
-51 ,055
-72,565
+8,027
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
1 .1327
0.4866
0.6773
0.6553
9.0914
0.8202
0.7223
0.3687
0.037S)
4.7637
2.0726
1.1963
0.6081
4.3820
2.3266
1.5261
0.8806
1.6475
0.9543
0.5337
3.1714
3.1169
3.6501
2.2656
1.1225
2.1459
0.1943
0.46&3
0.4250
0.9716
4.0214
0.2300
11.3667
1.9324
0.1022
6.6422
0.7761
1.4922
3.8368
0.4198
1.4378
0.2466
1.4106
3.9577
0.3703
0.2712
2.1333
1.9570
2.1545
2.0357
0.1242
0.0965
0.0769
0.0000
I .2281
0.2195
0.0416
1976 FPA
ASSESSMENT
0.9741
0.8041
0.7240
0.6214
il.64^1
1.5145
0.9781
0.3982
0.0284
6.1703
1.9952
1.2225
0.4P47
3.0749
1.6534
1.2943
1.3081
1.5594
1.4013
0.5518
2.1948
2.9036
3.3641
1.7H70
0.8971
2.7396
0.1197
0.3943
0.4071
1.0890
4.4235
0.2 121
10.2606
1.9300
0. 1165
4.7495
0.6939
1.3437
4.0080
0.6334
0.6761
0.3196
1.705R
4.1096
0.5456
0.29R2
2.3737
2.3373
1.0626
1.9210
0.1161
O.OB63
0.0800
0.0708
1.2512
0.1063
0.0604
L -ICil 4LS
CHANGE
-0.15P5
+0.3175
+0.0476
-0.0338
+3.5577
+0.6943
+0.2558
+0.0295
-0.0093
+ 1.4066
-0.0773
+0.0262
-0.1233
-1.3070
-0.6733
-0.2317
+0.4276
-0.0880
+0.4470
+0.0161
-0.9765
-0.2132
-0.2859
-0.4785
-0.2253
+0.5937
-0.0745
-0.0739
-0.0178
+0.1174
+0.4021
-0.0178
-1.1060
-0.0023
+0.0143
-1.8926
-O.C821
-0.1484
+ 0.1712
+0.2136
-0.5616
+0.0732
+0.2952
+0.1519
+0.1753
+0.0270
+0.2404
+0.3803
-1.0918
-0.1146
-O.OOPO
-0.0101
+0.0031
+0.0708
+0.0231
-0.1131
+0.0168
U.S. TOTALS
59,250t919 54,072,955 -5,177,964
100.0003
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FFE-RUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 6
ALASKA
AfilZOMA
AHUNSAS
CALIFORNIA
CTL.1R&D3
CTNNtCTICUT
DIST. OF C1LUM.
FLL'USA
(it [ ?G1 A
H/'.t'A I]
ILLINOIS
I NT 1 ANA
IDhi
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MA1ME
MARYLAND
M:SACHU SETTS
KIC'UGA-J
riNNESDTA
«1!31SSIPPI
t-'i j.soim
MlMAM/i
Kf 3ASK4
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEK YORK
Nfif..TH CAROLINA
NOF.TH DAKOTA
OHIO
O'LAHDMS
ORE SOU
PENNSYLVANIA
RHCOF ISLAND
5GUTK CAROLINA
fPIITH DAKOTA
11KNFSSEE
7 E X A S
UT/H
VFfc
75 , 1 5 6
2,B76,l'iO
82,793
'I*, 817
32,7«9
10,058
106,036
293, 22P
65,085
205,,]773
0
468, 246
126,67".
330,266
79,26,33e
lBl,77f
29^,203
81
197,9
-------
FEBRUARY 10t 1979
TABLE 7
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
[ FLAWS RE
OIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GLDRGIA
HAWAII
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
KftlMF
MAP YL4NO
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
M-V4DA
NFW HAMPSHIRE
NFh' JERSEY
NEV IE* i co
NEk YORK
NCFTH CAROLINA
NDFTH DAKOTA
GH13
OKLAHOMA
CPf GON
PFMSYLVANI.6
PhCflE ISLAMD
SClifK CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
If XAS
UIAH
VtklONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WFbr VIRGINIA
Kl SC3NSIN
AffUCSN SAMOA
C-U/S 1
PARIArtAS G^QUP
PUf9
+ 0
-1,633
+ 0
-15,53*
1
1976 EPi
EST1MATI
1.1956
0.117*
0.0272
0.9759
5.5682
1.4109
0.3006
0.**53
0.0566
5.6817
2.85*6
0.0000
0.223*
8.3*36
3.5*00
1.928*
0.1189
2.0082
0.3553
0.0768
5.6*78
1.3*97
*.235*
* .1102
1 .7*15
0.0332
0.0731
0.1136
0.5577
0.3678
3.3583
0.15*9
5.8325
2.*53*
0.0009
9.691B
1.3117
1 .*7b5
5.9102
0.3710
1 .0660
0,*08fc
1.8*67
6.*625
0.7691
0.31V3
1.****
1.1232
O.*076
1.9*92
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0899
0.0000
0.06*2
.£ERCEBI&eE_flE_BAIiailAL.-.IUIALS
1976 EPA
ASSESSMENT CHANGE
0.9516
0.0291
0.0
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLE 3
1979
416341*
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
D1ST. OF C3LUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOW4
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOIITH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UUH
VER10NT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CORRECTION OF INFILTRATION/INFLOW CONDITIONS
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY 111 A
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
74,963
1 ,865
1,530
2*. 10*
102,819
23,190
35,526
*,320
65,888
108,306
*7,2*1
132
18,779
117,19*
228,643
63,79*
38,338
73,361
12*. 923
16,456
2*. 5*5
19,158
82,9*9
28,06*
12*,B7B
21,796
7,362
5,635
2,507
7,623
1*2,132
*,826
168, *33
65,541
322
715, *88
37,451
131,798
37,775
9,669
*3,631
5,188
59,652
203,106
*7,963
1 ,880
33,700
122,521
B.397
82,390
2,130
0
528
0
6,915
0
9B
CQ.S.IS
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
B6,(>39
30,759
1,4*9
29, B6*
75,234
10,088
31,237
2,760
0
70,96*
78,273
27
14,628
1**,613
36,491
80,305
*B,115
7*. 180
*5,8*5
13,573
7,250
3,827
*3,860
28,102
98,58*
59,83*
2.70B
1,071
1,3*0
6,819
137,65*
9fi
103,955
67,0*1
514
256,455
36,45*
51,379
10,376
10,596
51,98*
3,1*1
12*. 660
21*, 956
*0,6B9
2,260
11,360
83,47*
1,636
76,702
7,863
0
596
0
14,531
0
115
CHANGE
+11 ,676
+28,89*
-31
+5,760
-27,595
-13,102
-*,289
-1,5*0
-65,638
-37,342
+31,032
-105
-* ,1 5 1
+27,419
-192,152
+16,511
+9,777
+ 819
-79,076
-2,883
-17,295
-15,331
-39,089
+ 38
-26,29*
+38,038
-*,65*
-4,534
-1,167
-80*
-*,478
-*,72fi
-6*,* 78
+1,500
+ 192
-*59,033
-997
-80,419
-27,397
+929
+P.353
-2,0*7
+64,998
+11,850
-7,27*
+ 380
-21,840
-39,047
-fc,761
-5,638
+5,733
+ 0
+ 5B
+ 0
+7,616
+ 0
+ 17
E.LECE
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
2.1871
0.05*4
0,0**6
0.7032
2.9998
0.6766
1.0365
0.1260
1.9223
3.1599
1 .3783
0.0038
0.5*79
3.4192
6.6709
1 .8612
1.1165
2.140*
3.6**B
O.*801
0.7161
0.5589
2.*201
o.eiee
3.643*
0.6359
0.21*7
0.1635
0.0731
0.222*
*.1*69
0.1*06
*.91*2
1 .9122
0.0093
20.8753
1.0926
3.«*53
1.1021
0.2621
1.2729
0.1513
1 .7*07
5.9259
1.3993
0.0548
0.9f32
3.5747
0.2*49
2.403E
0.0621
0.0000
0.0154
0.0000
0.201?
0.0000
a.oo2f
N.XAGE QE y^xio
1971 EPA
ASSESSMENT
3.554*
1.2619
0.059*
1.2252
3.0865
O.*138
1.2815
0.1 1*0
0.0000
2.9113
3.2112
0.0010
0.6001
5.9329
l.*970
3.2946
1.9739
3.0*33
1.380B
0.5568
0.297*
0.1569
1.799*
1.1529
*.0**5
2.*547
0.1110
0.0*39
0.05*9
0.2797
5.6*74
0.0040
*.26*B
2.7504
0.0210
10.521*
1.4955
2.107B
0.4257
0.4347
2.1327
0.12PB
5.114?
8.81BP
1.6693
0.0927
0.4B65
3.*2*6
0.0671
3. 1*66*
0.3225
c.ooro
0.0244
0.0000
C.5961
0.0000
0.00*7
CHANGE
+1.3673
+1.2075
+ 0.01*8
+0.5220
+0.0867
-0.2627
+0.2*50
-0.0119
-1 .9222
-0.2*8*
+ 1 .8329
-0.0026
+0.0522
+2.5137
-5.1738
+1.*33*
+0.855*
+0.9029
-1.7639
+0.0767
-O.*186
-0.4018
-0.6206
+0.33*1
+0.*011
+1.8188
-0.1036
-0.1195
-0.0181
+0.0573
+1.5005
-0.1367
-0.6*92
+O.S3B2
+0.0117
-10.3536
+0.*029
-1.737*
-0.6763
+0.1526
+O.R598
-0.022*
+3.3736
+2.B929
+0.2700
+0.0379
-0.4966
-0.1500
-0.1777
+0.7*30
+0.260*
+0.0000
+0.0090
+O.OOOC
+0.39**
+0.0000
+0.0019
U.S. TOTALS
3,*27.*27
2,*37,*52
-9*9,975
100.0000
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLE 9
1979
ALABAHfc
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
CPLORAOO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
CIST. OF CQLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
HP, I ME
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
N'FERASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEk JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NCRTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
C.REGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHD3E ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
It >AS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRSINH
HASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
kISCDNSIM
HYD1ING
AMERICAN SAMOA
CUA-1
Pf.RIAMAS GROUP
PUE UO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
V1F.GIM ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CORRECTION OF MAJOR REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY III B
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
2,919
76
0
0
10,613
269,937
11,398
1,667
0
7,33*
5*6
0
822
65,990
65,371
0
930
0
2,5(>3
*,228
1,282,*53
53,068
657,112
11,592
2,395
0
1,323
0
2*
*,530
31,628
690
2,869,157
0
1,5*2
*05,99B
1*,532
39,571
0
227
0
171
0
70,225
0
6,651
1,226
155,230
7fl
163,029
0
2,272
0
0
13,295
0
0
CQS1S-
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
2,376
8*
860
2,016
B*,100
90,*25
18,881
*95
0
0
1,560
0
315
3,858
15,720
208
16,83*
0
12,3*9
I*, 059
1,3*7,912
61,937
32,665
12,*93
C
7,323
1,*79
0
369
16,**0
1,*1*
1,203
2,762,267
0
1 ,5*2
6,331
20,961
36,901
0
2,565
C
1,19*
0
67,52*
0
10,896
1 ,529
60,056
665
1*3,1)1.3
0
1,189
C
0
9.21J-
0
C
CHANGE
-5*3
+ 8
+860
+2.016
+73,*37
-179,512
+7,*33
-1,172
+0
-7,38*
+1,01*
+ 0
-507
-62,122
-*9,651
+ 208
+ 15,90*
+ 0
+9,786
+9,831
+65,*59
+8,869
-62*,*27
+901
-2,385
+7,323
+ 156
+ 0
+3*5
+11,910
-30,21*
+ 313
-106,890
+ 0
+ 0
-397,957
+6,379
-670
+ 0
+2,336
+0
+ 1 ,023
+ 0
-2,701
+ 0
+ * ,2*5
+303
-95,17*
+5S7
-19,176
+ 0
-1,033
+ 0
+0
-*,077
+ 0
+0
|
1976 EP)
EST1MATI
0.0*68
0.0012
0.0000
0.0000
0.1702
*.3309
0.1823
0.0267
0.0000
0.118*
0.0087
0.0000
0.0131
1 .0586
1.0*88
0.0000
0.01*9
0.0000
0.0*11
0.067B
20.5761
0.851*
10.5*29
0.1859
0.0382
0.0000
0.0212
0.0000
0.0003
0.0726
0.507*
0.01*J
*6.033B
0.0000
0.02*7
6.5139
0.2339
0.63*8
0.0000
0.0036
0.0000
0.0027
0.0000
1.1267
0.0000
0.1067
0.0196
2.*905
0.001?
2.6156
0.0000
0.036*
0.0000
0.0000
0.2133
0.0000
0.0000
._EESCE.iaU£E_DE_tlAIJQti&U_lDlALS
19T8 EPA
ASSESSMENT CHANGE
6, 232,711
*,677,78b -1,35*,925
100.0000
0.0*67
0.0017
0.0176
0.0*13
1.72*1
1.B538
0.3870
0.0101
0,0000
0.0000
0.0319
0.0000
0.006*
0.0790
0.3222
0.00*2
0.3*51
0.0000
0.2531
0.2882
27.6336
1.2697
0.6700
0.2561
0.0000
0.1501
0.0303
0.0000
0.0075
0.3370
0.0289
0.02*6
56.6295
0.0000
0.0316
0.16*6
0.*297
0.7975
0.0000
0.0525
0.0000
0.02**
0.0000
1.38*3
0.0000
0.2233
0.0313
1.2312
0.0136
2.9*91
0.0000
0.02*3
O.OOOO
0.0000
0.1869
0.0000
0.0000
100.0000
+0.0019
+0.0005
+0.0176
+0.0*13
+1.5539
-2.*770
+0.20*2
-0.0165
+0.0000
-0.1183
+0.0232
+0.0000
-0.0066
-0.9795
-0.7265
+0.00*2
+0.3302
+0.0000
+0.2120
+0.220*
+7.0575
+0.*183
-9.8728
+0.0702
-0.0381
+0.1501
+0.0091
+0.0000
+0.0072
+0.26**
-0.*78*
+0.010*
+10.5957
+0.0000
+0.0069
-6.3*92
+0.1958
+0.1627
+0.0000
+0.0*89
+0.0000
+0.0217
+0.0000
+0.2576
+0.0000
+0.1166
+0.0117
-1.2592
+0.012*
+0.3335
+0.0000
-0.0120
+0.0000
+0.0000
-0.02*3
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10f 1979
TABLE 10
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ELIGIBLE NEW COLLECTORS AND APPURTENANCES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY IV A
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOMA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1
1
3
1
1
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
234,418
78,189
118,094
122,641
952,982
9,222
531,552
36,992
0
,294,634
239,834
146,058
106,843
378,854
521,245
105,574
87,667
257, 645
110,299
208,388
69,009
948,510
,397,841
193,576
59,963
181,302
20,315
16,384
30,244
245,380
451,595
26,451
,690,098
167,863
6,249
,107,467
75,187
276,136
,080,863
262,384
191,832
3,515
349,621
523,476
39,760
88,778
221,381
445,881
711,818
479,147
765
8,635
35,228
0
272,824
40,575
27,259
CQSIS
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
331,636
40,968
118,578
134,018
1,415,363
28,712
405,113
41,745
0
1,560,561
378,532
198,066
112,352
162,896
338,590
123,294
121,127
575,541
320,902
220,290
221,064
754,897
987,421
153,599
157,989
228,818
23,787
32,588
38,204
269,549
655,609
42,709
2. 436, 873
479,955
3,584
683,618
139,423
287,903
982,675
260,744
314,611
5,701
512,333
556,882
61,460
77,557
438,912
460,554
514 ,779
269,375
1,244
9,445
996
17,992
257,485
32,783
11,303
CHANGE
+97,218
-37,221
+434
+11,377
+462,331
+ 19,490
-126,439
+4,753
+ 0
+265,927
+138,698
+52,008
+ 5,509
-215,958
-182,655
+17,720
+33,460
+317,696
+210,603
+11,902
+152.055
-193,613
-410,420
-39,977
+98,026
+47,516
+3,472
+16,204
+7,960
+24,169
+204,014
+16,258
-1,253,225
+312,092
-2,665
-423,849
+64,236
+11,767
-98,138
-1,640
+122,779
+2,106
+162,712
+43,406
+21,700
-11,221
+217,531
+14,673
-197,039
-209,772
+ 479
+810
-34,232
+17,992
-15,339
-7,792
-15,956
EEBCE
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
1.2153
0.4053
0.6122
0.6358
4.9406
0.0478
2.7557
0.1917
0.0000
6.7118
1.2433
0.7572
0.5539
1.9641
2.7023
0.5473
0.4544
1.3367
0.5716
1.0803
0.3577
4.9174
7.2469
1 .0035
0.3108
0.9399
0.1053
0.0849
0.1567
1 .2721
2.3412
0.1371
19.1309
0.8702
0.0323
5.7415
0.3897
1.4315
5.6036
1.3602
0.9945
0.0162
1.8125
2.7138
0.2061
0.4602
1.1477
2.3116
3.6903
2.4840
0.0039
0.0447
0.1826
0.0000
1.4144
0.2103
0.1413
MTAGE QF NATJ.Q
197R EPS
ASSESSMENT
1.7433
0.2153
0.6233
0.7045
7.4403
0.1509
2.1296
0.2194
0.0000
6.2036
1.9898
1.0411
0.5906
0.8563
1.7799
0.64S1
0.6367
3.0255
1.6869
1.1580
1.1620
3.9683
5.1907
0. 11074
0.8305
1.2026
0.1250
0.1713
0.2008
1.4169
3.4464
0.2245
12.8103
2.5230
0.0188
3.5936
0.7329
1.5134
5.1657
1.3706
1.653B
0.0299
2.6932
2.9POO
0.3230
0.4076
2.3072
2.4210
2.7061
l.'.l&O
0.006*
0.0496
0.0052
0.0945
1.3535
0.1723
0.0594
CHANGE
+0.5280
-0.1899
+0.0110
+0.0686
+2.4997
+0.1031
-0.6261
+0.0276
+0.0000
+1.4917
+0.7464
+0.2839
+0.0367
-1.1077
-0.9224
+0.1008
+0.1822
+1.6887
+1.1151
+0.0776
+O.B043
-0.9490
-2.0562
-0.1961
+0.5196
+0.2629
+0.0197
+0.0863
+0.0440
+0.1448
+1.1052
+0.0873
-6.3205
+1.6527
-0.0135
-2.1478
+0.3431
+0.081B
-0.4378
+0.0103
+0.6593
+0.0117
+0.8806
+0.2661
+0.1169
-0.0525
+1.1595
+ 0.1094
-0.9842
-1.0660
+0.0025
+0.0048
-0.1773
+0.0945
-0.0608
-0.03PO
-0.0819
U.S. TOTALS
19,288,66B 19,022,705
-265,963
100.000D
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLF 11
1979
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEH INTERCEPTORS AND APPURTENANCES
THOUSANDS QF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY IV B
COSTS PERCENTAGE DE tliUQ!
1976
EPA
ESTIMATE
1
1
2
1
195
134
149
63
962
42
208
110
8
,123
425
344
157
521
431
169
184
437
121
161
505
719
,105
348
169
514
48
64
58
293
657
23
,448
469
15
,560
132
420
551
93
388
20
286
773
28
31
456
425
881
546
5
25
19
305
4
3
,489
.715
,053
,672
,808
,168
,665
,029
,255
,885
,975
,301
,109
.466
,943
,165
,435
,596
,640
,615
,224
,094
,856
,866
.988
,076
,168
,857
,711
,910
,806
,695
,877
,119
,521
,026
.743
,709
.422
,994
,819
,644
.811
,183
,578
,661
,970
,832
,760
.604
,334
,091
,332
0
,470
,008
,560
1978
EPA
ASSESSMENT
180
95
199
99
1.627
266
1B2
120
1,462
410
319
84
282
311
201
289
385
294
154
323
543
671
247
168
676
20
50
33
295
601
32
1,863
438
14
825
129
301
529
100
251
29
365
1,002
57
31
515
481
189
301
9
23
3
21
320
15
16
,667
,171
,788
,140
,446
,062
,421
,456
0
,342
,509
,745
,550
,361
,358
,978
,833
,922
,689
,585
,065
,030
,499
,995
,982
,294
,353
,403
,423
,824
,439
,651
,849
,387
,829
,196
,107
,060
,130
,638
,738
,799
,840
,366
,760
,260
,021
,274
,591
,991
,645
,790
,770
,000
,027
,642
,277
1976 EPA
CHANGE
-14
-39
+50
+ 35
+664
+223
-26
+ 10
-8
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
822
544
725
468
638
894
244
427
255
+338,457
-15
-24
-72
-239
-120
+32
+ 105
-51
+ 173
-7
-182
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
466
556
559
105
585
813
398
674
049
230
159
-176,064
-434
-100
-1
+ 164
-27
-14
-25
+ 1
-56
+8
-585
-30
,
,
,
,
,
*
,
,
,
f
,
,
357
871
006
216
815
454
238
914
367
956
028
732
-692
-734
-3
-119
-22
+6
-137
+ 9
+ 79
+229
+29
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
828
636
649
292
644
081
155
029
183
182
-401
+58
+55
-692
-244
+4
-1
-15
+21
+ 14
+ 11
+ 12
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
051
392
159
613
311
291
562
000
557
634
717
ESTIMATE
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
5
2
1
0
2
2
0
0
2
0
0
2
3
5
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
3
0
12
2
0
7
0
2
2
0
1
0
1
3
0
0
2
2
4
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.9601
.6616
.7321
.3127
.7287
.2071
.0246
.5404
.0405
.5199
.0921
.6910
.7716
.5611
.1214
.830E
.9056
.1492
.5974
.7947
.4813
.5317
.4313
.7134
.8346
.5248
.2365
.3185
.2883
.4435
.2307
.1163
.0275
.3040
.0762
.6619
.6519
.0662
.7082
.4616
.9096
.1013
.4086
.7974
.1403
.1555
.2443
.0916
.3307
.6846
.0261
.1231
.0949
.0000
.5003
.0196
.0174
197E FPA
ASSESSMENT
0.
0.
1.
0.
6.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
7.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
0.
1.
2.
3.
1.
0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
0.
10.
2.
0.
4.
0.
1.
2.
0.
1.
0.
1.
5.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
<577«
5151
OS13
5366
8069
4401
9673
651.0
0000
9152
2219
7306
4576
5283
6852
0932
5687
088P
5950
8367
7486
9392
6346
3423
9146
6714
1101
2728
1808
6012
2554
1767
0884
3728
OB02
4665
6988
6295
8640
5447
3625
1612
9801
4255
3126
1691
7876
6049
0261
6345
0521
1267
0203
1136
7322
0846
0880
20,360,585 18,474,970 -1,885,615
100.0000
100.0000
CHANGE
+0.0177
-0.1464
+0.3492
+0.2239
+4.08P2
+1.2330
-0.0374
+0.1115
-0.0404
+2.3953
+0.1298
+0.0396
-0.3139
-1.0327
-0.4361
+0.2624
+0.6629
-0.0603
+0.9976
+0.0420
-0.7326
-0.5924
-1.7966
-0.3710
+0.0798
+1.1466
-0.1263
-0.0456
-0.1073
+0.1577
+0.0247
+0.0604
-1.9389
+0.0688
+0.0040
-3.1953
+0.0469
-0.4366
+ 0.155B
+0.0831
-0.5470
+0.0599
+0.5715
+ 1.6281
+0.1723
+0.0136
+0.5433
+0.5133
-3.3044
-1.0500
+0,0260
+0.0056
-0.0744
+0.1136
+0.2319
+0.0650
+0.0706
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 12
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS ANCI PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEtDS
FOR CORRECTION OF CO.MBIMED SEWER OVERFLOWS
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY V
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
D1ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO.
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
10kA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAIME
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVAOA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NE* JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHI9
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VER10NT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
COSTS
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
0
3,429
2
1
1
1
3
2
53
437
3
439
45
169
342
9
,937
,400
103
122
150
547
53
995
,530
253
,467
165
16
349
687
,025
14
,005
239
932
300
1
208
55
183
278
387
484
314
25
0
,136
,490
,826
,992
,136
,631
55 8
,192
0
,734
,137
,663
,137
,643
,161
0
,830
,914
,327
,710
,778
0
,849
0
,986
,658
,842
,139
0
,651
0
,582
,735
0
,106
,093
,140
0
,338
.319
,417
0
,716
,259
,934
,573
,915
0
0
0
0
,575
0
0
1976 EPA
SSSESSMENT
0
9,165
167
398
128
170
8
218
57
2,131
2,920
192
209
592
1,092
147
1,036
1,602
187
33
757
33
70
272
1,009
3,305
67
13
3,261
431
2,198
329
24
198
39
2
208
272
893
754
258
3
19
0
0
,715
661
,912
,961
,671
,533
,732
0
,256
,730
,755
,885
,776
,419
0
,520
,131
,200
,291
,214
,286
,919
.236
,806
0
,996
,763
0
,138
,342
,705
,614
0
,333
,106
,342
0
,057
,462
.148
,199
,981
,811
,318
,201
,905
,164
0
0
0
,360
0
0
CHANGE
+0
+5,736
-53
+0
,IS6
-269,775
-3
-41
+83
+ 1
+ 7
-123
+47
-905
+1,520
+89
+87
+442
+ 544
+93
+40
+ 71
-66
+33
-709
+33
-95
-16
-76
+ 322
+279
+67
+1,255
+ 192
+1 ,266
+29
+22
-9
-16
+ 2
+25
-5
+ 505
+ 269
-46
+ 3
-6
,165
,080
,825
,070
,965
,460
+0
,522
,407
,092
,748
,133
,258
+ 0
,690
.217
,873
,5S1
,564
,286
.930
,236
,180
,658
.846
.574
+0
,487
.342
-877
,879
+ 0
,227
.013
,202
+0
,719
,857
,259
,199
,265
,448
.334
,628
,010
,164
+ 0
+0
+0
,315
+0
+0
PERCENTAGE. D£ NA.I10J
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
0.0000
0.0165
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
14
5
0
0
0
0
2
0
4
7
1
0
7
0
0
0
1
3
0
14
0
0
9
0
1
4
1
0
0
i
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0000
.2563
.108B
.0184
.1209
.2175
.8175
.0027
.6494
.0000
.0469
.1579
.7516
.4971
.5911
.7238
.0000
.6407
.2598
.7977
.3785
.2232
.0000
.0755
.0000
.8001
.0802
.6863
.3124
.0000
.5846
.0000
.0702
.6662
.0000
.1525
.4929
.4467
.0000
.0064
.0041
.2671
.0000
.8855
.3412
.8702
.3357
.5179
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.1237
.0000
.0000
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.0000
0.0355
0.
C.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
11.
0.
0.
2.
0.
4.
0.
4.
6.
0.
0.
0000
oooo
6514
0025
5496
5009
6629
0331
8496
0000
2224
2808
3459
7492
8148
3012
0000
2439
5715
0252
2242
7272
1292
2.9441
0.
0.
0.
i.
3.
0.
12.
0.
0.
12.
0.
1.
8.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1290
2750
0000
0604
9225
0000
8391
2615
0532
6700
0000
6755
5387
2793
0000
0934
7709
1520
0085
8117
0597
4701
9297
0445
0122
0000
0000
0000
0751
0000
ooeo
CHANGE
+0.0000
+0.0190
+0.0000
-0.2562
-1.4572
-0.0158
-0.5712
+0.2834
-0.1545
+0.0304
-0.7997
+0.0000
+0.1755
-5.B769
+4.5943
+0.2521
+0.2237
+1.5774
+0.0000
+1.6032
+0.3117
-0.7724
-1.1542
-0.4959
+0.1292
-4.1312
+0.1290
-0.5250
-0.0801
-0.6258
+0.6101
+0.0000
-1.7454
+0.2615
-0.0169
+3.0018
+0.0000
+0.5230
+4.0458
-0.1673
+0.0000
+0.0870
-0.2331
-0.1150
+0.0085
-0.0736
-0.2814
+1.5999
+0.5940
-0.4733
+0.0122
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0000
-0.0484
+0.0000
+0.0000
U.S. TOTALS
20,745,499 25,742,719 +4.997,220
100.0003
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FtPRUARY 10,
TtBLt. 13
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
D!ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IBWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEM HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
MEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GJAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
1976 MEtbS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NtKOS
FOR TREATMENT AND/OR CONTROL OF STDRMKATERS
THOUSANDS OF 1976 DOLLARS
CATEGORY VI
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
368,362
17,269
594,223
131,652
6.018.621
197,752
1,681 .671
106,019
130,394
9,358,283
551,036
529,446
10,059
2,267,296
870,352
153,032
141,859
173,731
286,016
140,397
1,281,696
2,651,241
1,511,328
313,211
240,384
585,125
9,219
74,302
141,606
149,531
9,138,512
41,374
2,460,407
195,798
2,308
5,398,476
273,084
274,100
3,518,786
98,761
168.268
6,843
460,382
3,985,015
186,475
0
1,761,356
282,326
22,417
2,171,813
0
0
0
0
362,706
0
0
C.QSIS.
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
1,428,370
122,010
531,491
610,525
4,047,876
319,494
2,441,443
270,383
184,561
6,909,125
1 .068,665
205,653
41,671
1,855,135
1,633,752
482,182
418,709
925,625
940,536
679,106
1,191,849
3,205,351
1,719,430
527,889
415,338
1,172,799
26,079
131,578
217,645
958,894
5,378,994
84,984
2,026,998
777,296
16,779
3,558,954
411,963
901,669
2,609,314
347, D16
379,781
30,032
1,313,997
3,773,298
171,921
0
1,975,668
1,374,248
220,100
1,230,055
0
0
0
0
404,121
0
0
CHANGE
+1,060,008
+104.741
-62,732
+478,673
-1,970,945
+ 121 ,742
+759,772
+164,364
+54 ,157
-2,449,158
+517,629
-323,793
+31,612
-412,161
+763,400
+329,150
+276,850
+751,894
+654 ,520
+538,709
-89,847
+554,110
+208,102
+214,678
+174,954
+587,674
+ 16,860
+57,276
+76,039
+809,353
-3,759,518
+43,610
-433,409
+581,498
+ 14,471
-1,839,522
+138,879
+627,569
-909,472
+248,255
+211,513
+23,189
+353,615
-211,717
-14,554
+0
+214,312
+1,091,922
+197,683
-941 ,758
+0
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+41 ,415
+ 0
+ 0
EtBLE
1976 EPA
ESTIMATE
0.5990
0,0280
0.9662
0.2144
9.7875
0.3215
2.7346
0.1724
0.2120
15.2160
0.8960
0.8609
0.0163
3.6869
1.4153
0.2488
0.2306
0.2625
0.4651
0.2283
2.0842
4.3113
2.4576
0.5093
0.3909
0.9515
0.0149
0.1208
0.2302
0.2431
14.8606
0.0672
4.0010
0.3183
0.0037
8.7787
0.4440
0.4457
5.7220
0.1606
0.2736
0.0111
0.7486
6.4802
0.3032
0.0000
2.8642
0.4591
0.0364
3.5317
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.5898
0.0000
0.0000
N.X&&E. 0£ E£XJOj
mS EPA
ASSESSMENT
2.3161
0.1978
0.8618
0.9899
6.5637
0.5180
3.958R
0.4384
0.299?
11.2033
1.732B
0.3334
0.0675
3.00P1
2.6491
0.7816
0.6789
1.5009
1.5250
1.1011
1.9326
5.1975
2.7880
0.8559
0.6734
1.9017
0.0422
0.2133
0.3529
1.554P
8.7221
0.1377
3.2866
1.2603
0.0271
5.7709
0.6679
1.4620
4.2310
0.5626
0.6158
0.0466
2. 1306
6.1184
0.2767
0.0000
3.2035
2.2283
0.3568
1.9945
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.6552
0.0000
0.0000
61,494,744 61,670,352
+175,608
100.0000
100.0000
CHANGE
+1.7171
+0.1696
-0.1043
+0.7755
-3.2237
+0.1965
+1.2242
+0.2660
+0.0872
-4.0146
+0.8368
-0.5274
+0.0512
-0.6787
+1.2338
+0.5330
+0.4483
+ K2184
+1.0599
+0.8728
-0.1515
+0.8862
+0.3304
+0.3466
+0.2R25
+0.9502
+0.0273
+0.0925
+0.1227
+1.3117
-6.1384
+0.0705
-0.7141
+0.9420
+0.0234
-3.0077
+0.2239
+1.0163
-1.4909
+0.4020
+0.3422
+0.0375
+1.3820
-0.3617
-0.0244
+0.0000
+0.3393
+1.7692
+0.3204
-1.5371
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0654
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 1*
197b NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA COSTS F3R CONSTRUCTION OF PUB LICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1976 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORIES I THRU V
ALA34MA
AISSKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
CXLOSADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
PIST. OF CQLUM.
FLCRIDA
GEORGIA
HAWUl
ituno
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SU.'TH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTA1
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AfEUCAN SAHOA
GUA'1
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAt. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 EPA
* ASSESSMENT
9*7,377
515,777
512,875
501,930
8,0*1,**9
9*8, P20
1,383,067
389, 31C
186,077
* ,976,527
1,755,995
859,176
446,6*3
*, 105, (536
*, 205,6*6
1 ,096,588
1,103,188
2,085,386
1 ,136,673
1,638,P39
2 ,910,16*
3,*26,9*5
*,*85,332
1 ,3*7, 69*
77*, 969
2,535,32*
125,986
317,681
260,078
1,15*. 711
*,196,37*
150,752
1*,156,*69
1 ,657,975
82,352
6,777,9*9
572,101
1,536,102
5,35B,*5*
9*5,772
8*0,375
207,0*1
1 ,757,853
3,110,7*2
399,396
*60,989
2,008,651
2,761.303
1,8*5,897
1,797,595
75,09*
57,318
**,658
56,322
977,206
90.2B7
**,120
1977
POPULATION
3,690
*07
2,296
2,1**
71,696
2,619
3,1 Ob
t.82
690
B,*52
f ,0*8
B95
657
1 1,2*5
5,330
2,679
2,326
3,*58
3,921
1,085
*,139
5,762
9,129
3,975
2,389
*,801
761
1 ,561
633
B*9
7,329
1,190
17,92*
5,525
653
10,701
2, £11
2,376
11,785
935
2,876
689
*,299
12,630
1,268
*83
5,135
3,653
1 ,1,59
* ,651
*06
29
93
12
3,232
11*
95
COSTS PER
CAPITA (1977)
256
1.267
223
23*
367
362
**5
666
269
586
3*7
959
E21
365
789
380
*7*
603
289
1,510
703
592
*91
339
32*
528
165
203
*10
1,360
572
133
789
300
126
633
203
6*6
*5*
ItCll
292
300
*OB
2*2
31*
95*
391
75*
992
386
18*
1,976
*82
*,693
297
791
*6*
2000
POPULATION
*,l*o
667
*,1*9
2,970
26,786
3,868
3.7*1
8*1
661
15.0*9
7,053
1,366
1,183
12,358
5,732
3,101
2,517
*,22*
*,659
1,222
5,583
6,61*
1C, 31*
*,505
2,7*0
5,225
802
1,73*
1,1*1
1,306
B,7*7
1,*36
18,922
7,*19
690
12,031
3,396
3,209
12,365
1,033
3.700
730
5,573
18,069
1,668
607
6,755
*,*17
2,003
5,553
*9*
*0
275
35
*,700
170
116
COSTS PER
CAPITA (2000!
228
773
123
169
300
2*5
369
*62
2P1
330
2*8
628
377
332
733
353
*38
*93
?**
1,3*1
521
flB
*3*
299
282
*85
157
183
227
88*
*79
110
7*R
223
119
563
168
*78
*33
915
227
Z83
315
172
236
759
297
625
921
323
155
1,*32
163
1,609
207
531
380
U.S. TOTALS
106,153,617
219,955
270,
392
-------
FEBRUARY 10f
TABLE 15
1979
1976 NF.EIJS SURVEY
PER CA»1TA COSTS FOS CONSTRUCTION OF PJBLICLY-OWNEC TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORIES ! II 1VB
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
(1T.T. OF COLUM.
f LP3IOA
GEORGIA
HAH* 1 1
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IDt-A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
M» INF
MARYLAND
MtFSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
^ i
HOVTANA
NEF.RASKA
NCVA94
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NE» JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
Mf» YORK
MIRTH CAROLINA
NOKTH DAKOTA
OH in
C-KLAHOMA
fKESUN
f FKMSYLVANIfv
FHliDE ISLAND
5-DUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH 06KHTA
TtNMESSEE
TEXAS
U164
VEF-10NT
VIR3IMIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRSIN1A'
I 1 JCCNSIN
WYOMING
i^L^KAN SAMOA
nus-i
PUF Ufl RICO
Fft. TR. TCKR.
VI"';i>J ISLANDS
1973 EPS
* ASSESSMENT
526,726
<*3«,B01
391, yea
336,032
6,299,037
816,942
528,924
215,329
15,406
3,336,469
1 ,071', 098
661, OB3
262,092
1,662,739
894,090
699,896
707,336
343,245
757,777
29S.397
1 ,186,837
1 ,570,064
1 ,819,075
96t,2P6
4P5, 110
1 ,481 ,430
64,776
213,216
220, 165
58fi,907
2,391,934
114,742
5,54Ci,23t
1 ,043,637
63,007
2.56R.231
375,263
726, >B6
?, 167, 295
34?, 523
473, 7FO
172, 94B
922, 39t
2 ,222,232
?95,04b
16] ,29f-
1 ,283, 539
1 ,263,9C1
574, Sit
1 ,038,760
62,8?3
46.6B4
43,26fc
3r<,330
676,612
57.SD",
32, 702
1977
POPULATION
3,690
407
2,296
2,144
21 ,896
2,619
3,108
562
690
6,452
5,048
895
857
11 ,245
5,330
2,879
2,326
3,453
3,921
1,085
4,139
5,782
9,129
3,975
?,389
4,t01
761
1 .561
633
649
7,329
1 ,190
17,924
5,525
C53
10,701
2,811
2,376
] 1 ,785
935
2,1-76
619
4 ,299
li ,£.30
I , 2 6ti
483
f. ,1 35
3.65B
1 ,»59
4 ,651
406
29
93
12
;,i^2
JI4
c)e>
COSTS PER
CAPITA (1977)
142
1,068
170
156
287
312
170
369
22
39
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 16
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA C3STS FOR CONSTRUCTION DF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORY I
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
D1ST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEX1S
UTSH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMFRICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MMIAMAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRSIN ISLANDS
1978 EPA
* ASSESSMENT
150,900
333,660
182,420
65, 174
Z, 691, 832
236,656
207,071
573
0
468,246
126,674
330,266
79,248
86,707
46,336
181,778
294,203
84,195
405,453
121,286
20,523
776,080
171,311
12,584
55,795
779,568
37,974
159,948
65,141
197,946
924,316
62,084
2,393,139
149,020
48,178
86,162
33,475
21,922
506,163
144,935
158,419
43,304
168,914
4,882
6,926
44,214
439,709
590,292
271,768
100,147
49,231
22,894
36,327
17,330
336,46]
41,862
16,425
1977
POPULATION
3,690
407
2,296
2,144
21,696
2,619
3,108
582
690
8,452
5,048
695
857
11 ,245
5,330
2,879
2,326
3,458
3,921
1,035
4,139
5,762
S.I 29
3,975
2,389
4,801
761
1,561
633
h49
7,329
1,190
17,924
5,525
653
10,701
2,611
2,376
11,785
93'j
2,876
689
4,299
12,830
1.263
483
5,135
3',65H
1 , c 59
4 ,651
406
29
93
12
3,282
114
95
COSTS PER
CAPITA (1977)
40
819
79
30
122
90
66
0
C
55
25
369
92
7
8
63
126
24
103
111
4
134
1H
3
23
162
49
102
102
233
126
52
133
2t
73
8
11
9
42
155
55
62
39
C
5
91
85
161
146
21
121
789
412
1 ,444
102
367
172
2000
POPULATION
4,140
667
4,149
2,970
26.7B6
3,b68
3,741
841
661
15,049
7,053
1,366
1,183
12,358
5,732
3,101
2,517
4,224
4,(,?9
1,222
5,583
6,614
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,225
602
1,734
1,141
1,306
8, 747
1,436
18,922
7,419
690
12,031
3,3Q6
3,209
12,365
1,033
3,700
730
5,573
18,069
1.6BB
607
6,755
4,417
2,003
•5,553
4B4
40
275
35
4,700
170
116
COSTS PER
CAPITA (2000)
3fc
500
43
21
100
61
55
0
0
31
17
241
66
7
8
58
lie
19
87
99
3
117
16
2
20
149
47
92
57
151
105
43
126
20
6°
7
9
6
40
140
42
59
30
0
4
72
65
133
13«-
16
101
572
139
495
71
?46
141
U.S. TOTALS
15,090,091
219,955
270,414
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 17
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA CDSTS FDR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORY II
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOH4
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
cut*
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
1978 EP«
* ASSESSMENT
195,159
5,970
9,780
171, 71B
1 ,979,759
316, 222
139,432
9
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLE 18
1979
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA COSTS FDR CONSTRUCTION QF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1976 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORY III A
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IDHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
197S EPA
ASSESSMENT
86,639
30,759
1,449
29,864
75,Z3
-------
FEBRUARY 1O, 1979
TABLE 19
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA C3STS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORY III B
ALA3AMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OUT. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLIMOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEV4TA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nth JERSEY
NFh MFXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
CHIO
OKLAHOMA
URL-SON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
If MESSEE
ItXAS
UTAH
VER1UMT
VIfGINI A
ktSHlNGTON
K'EST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
wrniiNG
APF3ICAN SAMOA
lUAi
,»iS<; I 1»JAS GROUP
PUMTO RICO
HAC . TR. TFRR.
VltiCIN ISLANDS
1973 EPA
* ASSESSMENT
2,376
8*
860
2,016
84,100
90,425
le.BBi
495
0
0
1,560
0
315
3,858
15,7?0
208
16,83*
0
12,349
14,059
1 ,347,912
61,937
32,685
12, 493
0
7,323
1,479
0
369
16,440
1,414
1,203
2,762,267
0
1,542
8,031
20,961
3E..901
3
2,565
0
1,194
0
67,524
0
10,1)96
1,529
60,056
665
143,fc53
0
1,189
0
0
9,218
0
0
1977
POPULATION
3,690
407
2,296
2,144
21,896
2,619
3,108
592
690
6,452
5,048
B95
657
11,245
5,330
2,879
2,326
3,458
3,921
1,085
4,139
5,782
9,129
3,975
2,389
4,801
761
1,561
633
849
7,329
1 ,190
17,924
5,525
653
10,701
2,811
2,376
1] ,735
935
2,876
689
4,^99
12,b30
1,268
4«3
5,135
3,659
1 ,659
4,651
406
29
93
12
3,232
114
95
COSTS PER
CAPITA (1977)
0
0
0
0
3
34
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
7
0
3
12
325
10
3
3
0
1
1
0
0
19
0
1
154
0
2
0
7
16
0
2
0
1
0
5
0
22
D
16
0
30
0
41
0
0
2
0
0
2000
POPULATION
4,140
667
4,1*9
2,970
26,786
3,868
3,741
841
661
15,0*9
7,053
1,366
1,183
12,358
5,732
3,101
2.517
4,224
4,659
1,222
5,583
6,614
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,225
802
1,734
1,141
1.306
8,747
1,436
18,922
7,419
690
12,031
3,396
3,209
12,365
1,033
3,700
730
5,573
18,069
1,688
607
6,755
4,417
2,003
5,553
4R4
40
275
35
4,700
170
116
COSTS PER
CAPITA (2000)
0
0
0
0
3
23
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
6
0
2
11
2*1
9
3
2
0
1
1
0
0
12
0
0
1*5
0
2
0
6
12
0
2
0
1
0
3
0
17
0
13
0
25
0
29
0
0
1
0
0
U.S. TOTALS
4 ,677,786
219,955
270,414
IB
-------
FEBRUARY JO, 1979
TABLE 20
197B MEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA COSTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 1977 POPULATION AND PROJECTED 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORY IV A
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HftMAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MRYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OH ID
OKLAHOMA
CREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH (1AKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 EPA
* ASSESSMENT
331,636
40,966
118,578
13*1,018
1 ,415,363
2P.712
405,113
4 1 , 7
-------
FtlKLVRY 1C, 1
-------
EFPPUARY I", 1979
TABLE 22
197fc NH DS SU«« Y
PES CAPITA COSTS F3< CGNSTKUCTiOT CT PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIPS
e.ASi-D ON 1977 POPULA1IO-M AND ^HDJECTF.D 20CO POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF- l°7fi DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORY V
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COL1RAOO
CONNtCTJCUT
f.FLA>!ARE
CIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEC1G1A
HfcMAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IDWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUIS!ANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
HICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
KI5.S1SSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NECSASKA
HEVAOA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NfW JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
HE* YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NOf:TH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEX.VS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
wlSCI1NSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUM
M.RIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
197S EPS
* ASSESSMENT
0
9,165
i;
0
167,715
6frl
398,912
IZS.Ibl
170,671
6,5=3
216,732
0
57,256
2,131,730
2,920,755
192,885
209,776
592,419
0
1 ,092,520
147,131
1,036,230
1 ,602,291
187,21
0
0
2000
POPJLAT1PN
4,140
6fc7
4,149
2,970
26,766
3,66ft
3,741
841
661
15,049
7.C53
1,366
l.lf 3
12.35P
5,732
3,101
2,517
4,224
4,659
1,222
5,563
6,614
10,314
4,505
2.740
5,225
802
1,734
1,141
1,306
8,747
1,436
18,922
7,419
690
12,031
3,396
3,209
12,365
1,033
3,700
730
5,573
16,0fr9
1,68B
607
6,755
4,417
2,003
5,553
4B4
40
275
35
4,700
170
116
COSTS PER
CAPITA (2000)
0
13
0
0
6
0
106
153
258
0
31
0
48
172
509
62
83
140
0
894
26
156
155
41
12
145
41
40
0
209
115
0
174
9
19
271
0
134
177
318
0
32
35
2
1
344
40
202
376
48
6
0
0
0
4
0
0
U.S. TOTALS
25,742,719
219,955
270,414
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 23
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IONA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEV4DS
NtH HAMPSHIRE
NfW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLS i
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHING!, t
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AFRICAN SAMOA
GUAM
KARIANAS GRCUP
PUERTO RICO
P«f. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
PER CAPITA COSTS FDR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
BASED ON 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORIES I_IH,SU_M
1976 EPA
* ESTIMATE
983,473
371,875
520,932
588,251
6,298,173
792,199
1, 446,461
306,628
257,928
4,233,437
1,857,904
855,026
49S.5D4
6,095,555
3,594,601
1,176,748
771,395
1,457,536
803,267
1,093,149
3,309,029
3,862,863
5,831 ,375
1,829,455
852,366
2,942,420
144,158
465,497
301,300
1,183,108
3,695,315
16B.476
16,488,269
1.378,404
83,265
8,170,306
587,124
1,570,773
4,324,092
821,190
1,087,405
155,371
1,453,449
3,197,223
307,145
441,731
1 ,798,570
2,271,194
2,481 ,475
2,245,665
76,494
68,090
81 ,338
0
1 ,046,376
170,644
52,032
1978 EPA
* ASSESSMENT
947,377
515,777
512, P75
501,930
8,041,449
948,828
1,383,067
389,310
186,077
4,976,527
1,755,995
859,176
446,643
4,105,636
4,205,646
1 ,096,588
1 ,103,188
2,085,385
I ,136,873
1,638,839
2,910,164
3,426,945
4,405,332
1,347,694
774,969
2,535,324
125,986
317,601
260,078
1 ,154,711
4 ,196,374
15B.752
14,156,469
1 ,657,975
82,352
6,777,949
572,101
1 ,536,102
5,358,454
945,772
S40.375
207,041
1,757,853
3,110,742
399,396
460,989
2,008,651
2,761,303
1,845,897
1 ,797,595
75,094
57,316
44,856
56,322
977,206
90.2P7
44,120
2000 POP,
4,140
667
4,149
2,970
26,786
3,968
3,741
841
661
15,049
7,053
1,366
1,183
12,358
5,732
3,101
2,517
4,224
4,659
1,222
5,533
6,614
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,225
802
1,734
1,141
1,306
6,747
1,436
18,922
7,419
690
12,031
3,396
3,209
12,365
1,033
3,700
730
5,573
18,069
1 ,63B
607
6,755
4 ,417
2,003
5,553
434
40
275
35
4,700
170
116
1976 COSTS
PER CAPITA
237
557
125
198
235
204
386
364
390
281
263
625
41S
493
627
379
306
345
172
894
592
584
565
406
311
563
179
26B
264
905
422
117
871
185
120
679
172
489
34V
794
293
214
260
176
It]
727
266
514
1,238
404
156
1,702
295
C
222
1,003
44E
1978 COSTS
PER CAPITA
228
773
123
169
300
245
369
462
2fll
330
248
628
377
332
733
353
43R
493
244
1,341
521
518
434
299
2C2
4P5
1K7
IPS
227
PP4
479
no
748
223
119
563
166
478
433
9)5
227
2S3
315
172
236
759
297
625
921
323
155
1,432
163
1,609
207
531
3PO
CHANGE IN PER
CAPITA COSTS
-9
+ 216
-2
-29
+65
+ 41
-17
+ 9B
-109
+ 49
-15
+3
-42
-161
+ 106
-26
+ 132
+ 140
+ 72
+ 447
-71
-66
-131
-107
-29
-78
-22
-85
-37
-21
+ 57
-7
-123
+ 3R
-1
-116
-4
-11
+P4
+ 121
-66
+6°
+ 55
-4
+^5
*32
+ 31
+ 111
-317
-M
-3
-27"
-13?
+ 1 ,609
-15
-472
-t,p
U.S. TOTALS
108,945,224
106,153,617
270,414
392
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 2*
ALA9AMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
CEHMARF
CIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IDKA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
M( IMF
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEh HAMPSHIRE
NEh JERSEY
Ntk MEXICO
N'EW YORK
NCISTH CAROLINA
"vCFTH DAKOTA
[••HI 3
OKLAHOMA
PENNSYLVANIA
K'HBTE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNFSS"
TFXAS
UTfiH
VEPMOKT
VIRGINIA
KtSHINGTDN
I'EST VIRGINIA
t.1! SCSMSIN
SAMOA
GROUP
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FDR CONSTRUCTION OF PJBL1CLY-OWNEO HASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES 1_IUEQU£U_M
/!«[RICAN
r-u/ '1
"tPIANAS
0 RICO
T1?. TERR.
IN ISLANDS
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
947,377
515,777
512,875
501,930
9,060,410
9*9,828
1 ,383,067
390 ,496
186,077
4,976,527
1,755,995
859,176
4*6,6*3
4,224,793
4,205,6*6
1 ,095,586
1,103,252
2,085,385
1 ,136,673
1 ,638,839
3,069,432
3,425,945
4,639,7*9
1,351,950
774,969
2,535,491
125,936
317,631
282,8*1
1,154,711
4,196,374
158,752
15,146,365
1 ,657,975
82,352
6,777,949
572,101
1 ,536,102
5, 391,569
945,772
840,375
212,691
l,757,er>3
IS 110, 790
399,396
461,772
r, 008, 651
2,848,103
1 ,8*5,767
2,123,813
75,094
57.31H
44,85?
56, 3? 2
967, 575
90,237
44,120
CCSIS
197E EPA
ASSESSMENT
947,377
515,777
512,875
501,930
8,041,449
9*8,828
1 ,383,067
389,310
186,077
4,976,527
1,755,995
859,176
446,6*3
4,105,836
4,205,646
1,096,568
1,103,188
2,085,385
1,136,673
1,638,639
2,910,16*
3,426,9*5
*, 465,332
1,3*7,694
774,969
2,535,32*
125,986
317,681
260,078
1,15*. 711
4,196,374
158,752
1*, 156, 469
1,657,975
8?, 352
6,777,949
572,101
1,536,102
5,358,454
945,772
6*0,375
207,041
1,757,653
3,110,742
399,396
460,989
2,008,651
2,761,303
1,8*5,897
l,797,59t
75,09*
57,31f-
44.B5E
36,322
977,206
90,287
44,120
DIFFERENCE
tO
tO
to
tO
-1,016,961
tO
to
-1,176
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
-118,957
to
tO
-64
tO
tO
tO
-159,318
to
-154,417
-4 ,256
tO
-lt>7
to
to
-22,763
to
to
to
-969,896
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
-33,135
tO
tO
-5,650
to
-48
to
-733
tO
-86, S JO
-870
-326,223
tO
tO
to
*0
-10,369
to
tO
EEB£.E
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
0.8684
0.472S
0.4701
O.*601
6.3056
0.8697
1 .267t
0.3579
0.1705
4.5619
1.6097
0.7876
O.*09*
3.B72B
3.8552
1.0052
1.0113
I .9116
1.0421
1.5023
2.8137
3.1*14
4.2532
1.2393
0.7104
2.3242
0.115*
0.2912
0.2592
1.0565
3.8467
0.1455
13.88*6
1.5193
0.0754
6.2133
0.5244
1.4081
4.9*24
0.8669
0.7703
0.19*9
1.6114
2.8516
0.3661
0.4233
1 .8413
2.61GE
1.6929
1 .9466
0.066*
0.0525
0.0413
O.OE16
0.9053
O.OP27
0.0*04
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.892*
0.4B5B
0.4631
0.4728
7.5752
0. 893P
1.302B
0.3667
0.1752
4.6P80
1.65*2
0.8093
0.4207
3.B67B
3.9618
1.0330
1.0392
1.964*
1.0709
1.5438
2.7*14
3.2282
4.2253
1.2695
0.7300
2.3683
0.1186
0.2992
0.2*50
1.0877
3:9531
0.1*95
13.335P
1.5618
0.0775
6. 3850
0.5389
l.**70
5.0*7P
0.8909
0.7916
0. 1Q50
1.6559
2.9304
0.376;
0.434?
1.B922
2.6012
1.73flfi
1.6933
0.0707
0.&539
0.0*22
0.0530
0.9205
0.0650
0.0415
DIFFERENCE
to.0240
to .0130
tO.0129
tO.0127
-0.7303
tO.02*0
tO.0350
tO.0087
tO.00*7
tO.1260
tO.O*«*
tO.0217
to.0113
-0.0050
tO.1065
tO.0277
tO.0278
tO.0528
to.0288
tO.0*15
-0.0723
tO.0868
-0.0279
tO.0302
to.0196
to.06*0
to.0031
tO.0080
-0.01*2
tO.0292
tO.1063
tO.0040
-0.5*87
tO.0*20
tO.0020
tO.1717
tO.01**
*0.0389
tO.1053
tO.0239
to.0212
tO.0000
tO.0*45
to.0787
to.0101
tO.0109
to.0508
-0.0096
to.0459
-0.2535
tO.0019
tO.0014
tO.0011
tO.001*
tO.0152
tO.0022
tO.0011
TOTALS
109,OB7,*70 100,153,617 -2,933,853
100.0000
100.0000
tO.0000
-------
1-fPfcUARY 10,
TABLE 2")
ALA3AMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
01 ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEH JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
NASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
NYOHING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 NEEDS SUKVEY
PER CAPITA COSTS FD* CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FAC1L1T1FS
BASED ON 2000 POPULATION
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORIES I THRU V
STATE
* ESTIMATE
947,377
515,777
513,675
501,930
9, 060, $10
948,828
1,383,067
390,486
186,077
it.976,527
1,755,995
859,176
446,643
4,224,793
"1,205,646
1,096,588
1,103,252
2.085,385
1.136,873
1,638,839
3,069,432
3,426,945
4,639,749
1,351,950
774,969
2,535,491
125,986
317,681
282,841
1,154,711
4,196,374
158,752
15,146,365
1,657,975
82,352
6,777,949
572,101
1,536,102
5,391,589
945,772
840,375
212,691
1,757,853
3,110,790
399,396
461,772
2,008,651
2,848,103
1.846,767
2,123,818
75,094
57,318
44,858
56,322
987,575
90,237
44,120
EPA
* ASSESSMENT
947,377
515,777
512. B75
501,930
8,041,449
948,628
1,383,067
389,310
180,077
4,976,527
1 ,755,995
859,17fc
446,643
4,105,836
4,205,646
1,096,568
1 ,103,188
2,085,365
1,136.873
1 ,638,839
2,910,164
3,426,945
4,485,332
1,347,694
774,969
2,535,324
125,986
317,681
260,078
1,154,711
4,196,374
15B.752
14,156,469
1 ,657,975
82,352
6,777,949
572,101
1,536,102
5,358,454
945,772
840.375
207,041
1 ,757,853
3,110,742
399.396
460,989
2,008,651
2,761,303
1,845,897
1 ,797,595
75,094
57,316
44,858
56,322
977,206
90,287
44,120
2000 POP.
4,140
667
4,149
2,970
26,786
3,868
3,741
641
661
15,049
7,053
1,366
1.133
12,358
5,732
3,101
2,517
4,224
4,659
1,222
5,593
6,614
10,314
4,505
2,740
5,225
832
1,734
1,141
1,306
P.747
1,436
18,922
7,419
690
12,031
3,396
3,209
12,355
1,033
3,700
730
5,573
18,069
1 ,638
607
6,755
4,417
2,003
5,553
484
40
275
35
4,700
170
116
STATE CCSTS
PER CAPITA
22!:
773
123
U9
336
245
369
464
281
330
248
62C
377
341
733
353
436
493
244
.1.341
549
518
449
300
282
465
157
163
247
884
479
110
800
223
119
563
168
478
436
915
227
291
315
172
236
760
297
644
922
3«2
155
1,432
163
1,609
210
531
360
EPA COSTS
PF.P CAPITA
22P
773
123
169
300
245
369
462
2fll
330
246
628
377
332
733
353
438
493
244
1,341
521
518
434
299
2S2
465
157
183
227
884
479
110
748
223
119
563
168
478
433
915
227
283
315
172
236
759
297
625
921
323
155
1,432
163
1,609
-207
531
3PO
DIFF. IN PER
CAPITA COSTS
+ 0
+0
+0
+0
-38
+0
40
-2
tO
40
+ 0
+ 0
40
_0
+0
40
+0
40
40
40
-2fl
+ 0
-15
-I
40
*0
40
+ 0
-20
+0
+ 0
+0
-52
+ 0
40
+ 0
40
»0
-3
40
40
-8
40
+ 0
40
-1
40
-19
-1
-59
+0
40
40
40
-3
40
40
U.S. TOTALS
109,087,470 106,153,617
270,414
39?
-11
-------
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
PIST. OF COL UN.
F-LC'RIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANS
KCNSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
K'EtRASKA
NEVADA
MEh HAMPSHIRE
NEf- JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHI3
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
CARIAMAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIKGIN ISLANDS
!'•'/>• Nttl'S SUtM/tY
CJSTS ANP mit'NTASf 3f NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT PLANTS
THOUSANDS !)F 1^78 DOLLARS
CATL-GDRtES I AND II
FfFPUARY 10,
TABLE 2ft
1979
COSTS PFktFNTiGt OF NAT 10
1978
STATE
ESTIMATE
4
1
1
1
]
1
4
1
1
1
346
339
192
235
,671
552
346
94
15
,674
668
341
177
,498
582
497
417
457
463
143
94B
,027
,216
722
316
B03
44
162
19B
293
,790
82
,457
605
48
,743
246
425
,665
241
222
144
556
,219
237
130
76S
782
385
999
53
22
39
17
359
41
16
,059
,630
,2DO
,892
,C91
,t'HO
,503
,873
,436
,127
,3B9
,33R
,542
,264
,732
,913
,503
,323
,CSB
,E12
,218
,054
,532
,547
,128
,144
,423
,613
,376
,093
,495
,091
,591
,250
,178
,033
,156
,526
,791
,695
,042
,324
,553
,866
,2Bfi
,818
,518
,627
,240
,134
,179
,894
,496
,330
, P43
,B62
,425
197S
EPA
ASSESSMENT
346
339
192
236
4,671
552
346
94
15
I,f74
668
341
177
1,330
582
497
417
457
463
143
663
1 ,027
1,147
71&
316
b03
44
162
186
293
1,790
82
3,684
605
48
1,743
246
425
1 ,638
241
222
143
556
1,219
237
130
768
7B2
3B5
736
53
22
39
17
356
41
16
,OP9
,630
,200
,092
,591
,680
,C03
,b73
,406
,127
,3P9
,33t
,54J
,37S
,732
, 9 1 fc
,5C3
,323
,0P8
,312
,742
,054
,576
,291
.121
,136
,423
,612
,742
,083
,495
,091
,367
,25C
,178
,033
,156
,526
,161
, BB5
,042
,149
,551'
,866
,26e
,035
,518
,627
,025
,769
,17(1
,894
,496
,330
,585
,862
,425
1978 STATt
DIFFEREMCE
+ 0
+0
to
+ 0
tO
to
tO
to
to
to
to
tO
tO
-117,336
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
-B4.476
to
-69,036
-4,256
tO
-8
tO
tO
-11,634
tO
tO
tO
-773,2')4
tO
+ 0
+ 0
tO
tO
-27,626
tO
to
-1,175
to
to
+0
-733
tO
+ 0
-215
-262,365
+ 0
+ 0
to
to
-3,258
tO
tO
ESTIMATE
0
0
0
0
12
1
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
4
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
2
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
12
1
0
4
0
1
4
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.9314
.9190
.5201
.6410
.6416
.4961
.9376
.2567
.0416
.0715
.8087
.9236
.4804
.0544
.5769
.3474
.1297
.2375
.2531
.3691
.5659
.7792
.2921
.9552
.8554
.1733
.1202
.4405
.5366
.7931
.8452
.2221
.0625
.637f.
.1303
.7167
.6661
.1515
.5077
.6545
.6008
.3905
.5060
.3010
.6421
.3540
.0796
.1176
.0424
.7037
.1439
.0615
,106f.
.0468
.9737
.1132
.0444
1976 EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.
0.
0.
0.
13.
1.
0.
0.
0.
5.
1.
0.
0.
3.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
2.
2.
q.
2.
0.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
10.
1.
0.
4.
0.
1.
4.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
9721
9540
5399
6654
1231
5531
9733
2665
0432
2646
6776
9589
49B7
8776
6369
3987
1728
2B46
300P
403°
4263
8651
2237
0177
eeeo
2561
1247
4573
5245
8233
0297
2306
3499
7002
1?53
8964
6914
1953
6016
6794
6237
4021
5634
4267
6665
3652
15S6
1985
0815
0696
1493
0643
1109
04R6
0016
1175
0461
DIFFERENCE
+0.0357
+0.0350
+0.019B
+0.0244
+0.4815
+0.0570
+0.0357
+0,0098
+0.0016
+0.1931
+0.0689
+0.0352
+0.0183
-0.1767
+0.0600
+ 0.0513
+0.0431
+0.0471
+0.0477
+0.0148
-0.1395
+0.1059
-0.0683
+0.0625
+0.0326
+0.0828
+0.0045
+0.016B
-0.0122
+0.0302
+0.1845
+0.0085
-1.7125
+0.0624
+0.0050
+0.1797
+0.0253
+0.0438
+0.0941
+0.0249
+0.0229
+0.0116
+0.0574
+0.1257
+0.0244
+0.0112
+0.0792
+0.0807
+0.0391
-0.6340
+0.0054
+0.0024
+0.00*1
+0.0018
+0.0279
+0.0043
+0.0017
U.S. TOTALS
36.953.B77 35,597,965 -1,355,892
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLE 27
1979
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
OELAHARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEH MEXICO
NEH YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FDR CONSTRUCTION DF PUBLICLY-OWNED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
THOUSANDS DF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES 1, II AND IV B
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
526,726
434,801
391 ,988
336,032
6,299,037
818,942
528,924
216,505
15,406
3,336,469
1,078,898
661,083
262,092
1,781,696
894,090
699,896
707,336
843,245
757,777
298,397
1 ,343,552
1,570,084
1,892,828
970,542
485,110
1,481,438
64,776
213,216
242,928
588,937
2,391,934
114,742
6,394,502
1,043,637
63,007
2,568,231
375,263
726,586
2,198,076
342,523
473,730
175,620
922,398
2,222,280
295,048
162,078
1,283,539
1,263,901
574,831
1,334,411
62,823
46,694
43,266
38,330
686,651
57,504
32,702
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
526,726
434,801
391,988
336,032
6,299,037
618,942
528,924
215,329
15,406
3,336,469
1,078,698
661,083
262,092
1,662,739
694,090
699,896
707,336
843,245
757,777
298,397
1,186,607
1,570,084
1,819,075
966,286
485, 11C
1,481,430
64,776
213,216
220,165
568,907
2,391,934
114,742
5,548,236
1,043,637
63,007
2,568,231
375,263
726,586
2,167,295
342,523
473,780
172,946
922,398
2,222,232
295,046
161 ,295
1,283,539
1,263,901
574,611)
1,038,760
62,823
46,684
43,266
36,330
676,612
57,b04
32,702
DIFFERENCE
+0
+ 0
to
+ 0
+0
+ 0
+ 0
-1,176
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
-116,957
tO
+0
+ 0
+ 0
to
+ 0
-156,745
+ 0
-73,753
-4,256
tO
-8
to
to
-22,763
tO
tO
tO
-B46.266
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
tO
tO
-30, 791
tO
to
-2,672
to
-48
tO
-7S3
+ 0
+ 0
-215
-295,651
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
tO
-10,039
+ 0
+ 0
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
0.9467
0.7814
0.7045
0.6039
11.3216
1.4719
0.9506
0.3891
0.0276
5.9966
1.9391
1.1862
0.4710
3.2023
1 .6070
1.2579
1.2713
1 .5156
1 .3620
0.5363
2.4148
2.822C
3.4020
1.7444
0.6719
2.6626
0.1164
0.3832
0.4366
1.0584
4.2991
0.2062
11 .4932
1.8757
0.1132
4.6160
0.6744
1 .3059
3.9507
0.6156
0.8515
0.3156
1.657fc
3.9942
0.5303
0.2913
2.3069
2.27H
1.0331
2.3964
0.1129
0.083<>
0.0777
0.06fcfc
1.2341
0.1035
0.0567
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.9741
0.8041
0.7249
0.6214
11.6491
1.5145
0.9781
0.3982
0.0284
6.1703
1.9952
1.2225
0.4847
3.0749
1.6534
1.2943
1.3081
1.5594
1.4013
0.551P
2.194S
2.9036
3.364]
1.7E70
0.6971
2.7396
0.1197
0.3943
0.4071
1.0890
4.4235
0.2121
10.2606
1.9300
0.1165
4.749C
0.6939
1.3437
4.0060
0.6334
0. 8761
0.319R
1.7058
4.1096
0.5456
0.2962
2.3737
2.3373
1.0626
1.9210
0.1161
0.0863
0.0°00
0.070«
1.2?. 12
0. 1063
0.0604
55,637,0i>8 «)4,072,95t -1,564,113
100.0003
100.0POO
DIFFERENCE
+0.0274
+0.0227
+0.0204
+0.0175
+0.3275
+0.0426
+0.0275
+0.0091
+0.0006
+ 0.1735
+0.0561
+0.0343
+0.0137
-0.1273
+0.0464
+0.0364
+0.0368
+0.0438
+0.0393
+0.0155
-0.2199
+0.0816
-0.0378
+0.0426
+0.0252
+0.0770
+0.0033
+0.0111
-0.0294
+0.0306
+0.1244
+0.0059
-1.2325
+ 0.0543
+0.0033
+ 0.1335
+0.0195
+0.0378
+0.0573
+0.0178
+0.0246
+0.0042
+0.0480
+0.1154
+0.0153
+0.0069
+0.0666
+0.0657
+0.0295
-0.4773
to.0032
tO.0024
to.0023
tO.0020
to.0171
+0.0030
tO.0017
tD.OOOC
-------
FEBRUARY 10i 1979
TABLE 28
1978 MEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR IMPROVEMENT OF TREATMENT PLANTS TO ACHIEVE SECONDARY LEVEL
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY 1
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM,
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I DMA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAIN!
MARYLAND
PtSSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
ME V404
NE» HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
fJEH MEXICO
NEV. YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
LHI3
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
frHOOE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UT6H
VEK4DNT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
k'EST VIRGINIA
XI SCON SIN
HVC'tlNG
MEXICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MAhllSAS GROUP
PUFRTO RICO
PAC. IR. TERR.
VIK;IN ISLANDS
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
150,900
333,660
182, $20
65,172ft
44,214
439,709
590,292
271,983
98,972
49,231
22,894
38,327
17,330
339, 739
41,8i>2
16,42!;
. tQSIS
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
150,900
333,660
182,420
65,174
2,691,832
236,658
207,071
573
0
468,246
126,674
330,266
79.24C
96,707
46,338
131,770
294,203
84,195
405,453
121, ?B6
20,523
776,080
171,311
12,584
55,795
779,566
37,974
159,948
65,141
197,946
924, 31£
b2,084
2,393.139
149,020
48,176
Bfc,182
33,475
21,922
506,163
144, 931:
158,419
43,304
168,914
4,88?
6,926
44,214
439,709
590,292
271,7f>t
100,147
49,231
22,894
38,327
17,330
336,481
41,862
16,4;";
DIFFEREMCE
tO
tO
to
+ 0
tO
to
+ 0
tO
tO
+ 0
*0
tO
to
tO
to
to
tO
to
to
tO
-1,115
tO
-1 ,999
-4,256
tO
-8
to
tO
-11,634
tO
to
to
-39,733
tO
to
tO
to
tO
-22,040
tO
*0
-1,175
tO
tO
*0
to
to
tO
-215
tl,175
to
tO
tO
tO
-3,258
tO
to
E
1978 STAT
ESTIMATE
0.9944
2.1988
1.2021
0.4294
17.7393
1.5595
1.3646
0.0037
0.0000
3.0857
0.8347
2.1764
0.5222
0.5713
0.3053
1.1979
1.9386
0.5546
2.6719
0.7992
0.1425
5.1144
1.1421
0.1109
•0.3676
5.1374
0.2502
1.0540
0.5059
1.3044
6.0913
0.4091
16.0326
0.9820
0.3174
0.5679
0.2205
0.1444
3.4806
0.9551
1.0439
0.2931
1.1131
0.0321
0.0456
0.2913
2.8977
3.8900
1.7923
0.662^
0.3244
0.1.50B
0.2525
0.1141
2.2366
0.2758
0.10P2
EEB£EllU£E-DE_B4IJDN/L_IDIALi
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT DIFFERENCE
0.9944
2.1988
1.2021
0.4294
17.7393
1.5595
1.3646
0.0037
0.0000
3.0857
0.8347
2.1764
0.5222
0.5713
0.3053
1.1979
1.9388
0.5548
2.6719
0.7992
0.1425
5.1144
1.1421
0.1109
0.3676
5.1374
0.2502
1.0540
0.5059
1.3044
6.0912
0.4091
16.0326
0.9820
0.3174
0.5679
0.2?05
0.1444
3.4808
0.9551
1.0439
0.2931
1.1131
0.0321
0.0456
0.2913
2.8977
3.8900
1.7923
0.6522
0.3244
0.150S
0.2525
0.1141
2.23B8
0.275S
0.10P2
-0.0055
-0.0122
-0.0067
-0.0023
-0.0990
-O.OOP7
-0.0076
tO.0000
*0.0000
-0.0172
-0.0046
-0.0121
-0.0029
-0.0031
-0.0016
-0.0066
-0.0108
-0.0030
-0.0149
-0.0044
tO.0065
-0.0285
to.0068
to.0275
-0.0020
-0.0286
-0.0013
-0.0058
to.0742
-0.0072
-0.0339
-0.0022
tO.1736
-0.0054
-0.0017
-0.0031
-0.0012
-o.oooe
to.1266
-0.0053
-0.005B
tO.0061
-0.0062
-O.OOOJ
-O.OOC-
-0.0016
-0.0161
-0.0217
-0.0085
-0.0114
-o.ooie
-o.oooe
-0.0014
-0.0006
to.0090
-0.0015
-0.0005
U.S. TOTALS
15,174,319 15,090,091
100.0000
100.0000
tO.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10.
TABLE 2!iIlCN.AL_lCI4Li
1976 EM
ASSESSMENT DIFFERENCE
21.779,558 20,507,89'* -1.271,664
100.0000
0.9516
0.0291
0.0476
0.8373
9.6536
1.5419
0.6798
0.4598
0.0751
6.8553
2.6414
0.0539
0.4792
6.3081
2.615*
1.5415
0.6012
1 .,8194
0.2P10
0.109B
4.1116
1.2237
4.7604
3.4411
1.2694
0.1149
0.0314
0.0139
0.5929
0.4638
4.2236
0.0975
/6.2963
' 2.2246
0.0000
8.0790
1.0370
1.9680
5.5198
0.4727
0.310?
0.4868
1.8902
5.9244
1.1232
0.41B4
1.6033
0.937P
0.5522
3.1042
0.0192
0.0000
0.0056
0.0000
0.0980
0.0000
0.0000
100.0000
+0.0556
-(0.0017
+0.0027
+0.0489
+0.5637
+0.0900
+0.0397
+0.0269
+0.0044
+0.4003
+0.1542
+0.0031
+0.0279
-0.1729
+0.1527
+0.0900
+0.0351
+0.1062
+0.0164
+0.0064
-0.1426
+0.0714
-0.0296
+0.2009
+0.0741
+0.0067
+0.0018
+0.0008
+0.0346
+0.0270
+0.2466
+0.0057
-3.0001
+0.1299
+0.0000
+0.4717
+0.0605
+0.1149
+0.2967
+0.0276
+0.0181
+0.0284
+0.1104
+0.3459
+0.0656
+0.0208
+0.0936
+0.0548
+0.0322
-1.0287
+0.0011
+0.0000
+0.0003
+0.0000
+0.0057
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.0000
-------
FFSRUARY 10, 1979
TABU' 30
lr,7! NE.fi US SUi-VEY
CDSTS AND Pf-kClHTAGE 3F NATIONAL NCECS
FDI. CORRECTION CF INF 1 L TR.U I ON/ INFLOW CONDITIONS
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
U TEGDRY I II /.
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AR1ZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNtCTICUT
DELAWARE
PIST. OF CCLUM.
FLORIDA
GLD3GIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
IMDIANA
ICWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NFP3ASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEK JERSEY
NEK MFX1CO
NEW YORK
NOPTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHI1
OKLAHOMA
OREGON'
PENNSYLVANIA
PHD3E ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VER-tONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE:
86,63'i
30,759
1,449
29,861
75, 23*
10,038
31, 257
2,780
0
70,964
7S,?73
27
14,628
144,613
36,491
80,305
48,179
74,190
45.R4E
13,573
7,250
3,827
69,726
28,132
98,5(34
59.K34
2,708
1,071
1,340
6.B19
137,654
93
108,453
67,0*1
«!<,
256,455
36,454
51,379
10,378
10,598
51,934
3, 141
124,660
214 ,956
40,689
2,250
11,660
170,274
2,291
78,758
7,863
0
596
0
14,531
0
115
C.QSIS
197» EPA
ASSESSMENT
e<>,63'/
30,759
1 ,449
29.B64
75,234
lO.Oht
31,237
2,760
t.
70,964
76,273
27
14,626
144,613
36,491
80,305
48,115
74,180
45,845
13,573
7,250
3,927
43,860
28,102
9B,58«i
59,834
2,706
1,071
1,340
6,819
137,654
96
103,955
67,041
514
256, 455
36,45i(
51,379
10,376
10,598
51 ,984
3,141
124,660
214,956
40,689
2,260
11,860
83,474
1 ,636
76,702
7,363
0
596
0
14,531
0
115
PFRCKNTAGF Of NAT 10
OIFFERE >ICE
+ 0
*C
*0
*0
*0
»0
*0
»0
*0
tO
+ 0
»0
*0
*0
*0
*0
-64
*0
*0
tO
tO
tO
-25 ,866
tO
to
tO
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
-4,498
tO
to
+0
to
tO
to
»0
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
-86,800
-655
-2,056
to
tO
to
tO
to
tO
*0
1978 S1ATE
ESTIMATE
3,3677
1.2027
0.0566
1.1677
2.941ft
0.3944
1.2214
0.1087
o.ocoo
2.774B
3.0606
0.0010
0.5719
5.6547
1.4268
3.1401
1.8639
2.9006
1 .7926
0.5307
0.2834
0.1496
2.7264
1 .0988
3.8548
2.3396
0.1058
0.0418
0.0523
0.2666
5.3625
0.0036
4.2407
2.6214
0.0200
10.0279
1.4254
2.0090
0.4058
0.4144
2.0326
0.1220
4.8744
8.4052
1.5910
0.06B3
0.4637
6.65E1
0.0895
3.0796
0.3074
0.0000
0.0233
0.0000
0.5661
0.0000
0.0044
?97t EPA
ASSESSMENT
3.5544
1.2619
0.0594
1.2252
3.0865
0.413P
1.2815
0.1 140
0.0000
2.9113
3.211?
C.0010
0.6001
5.9329
1.4970
3.2946
1.9739
3.0433
i.eeoe
0.5568
0.2974
0.1569
1.7994
1.1529
4.0445
2.4547
0.1110
0.0439
0.0549
0.2797
5.6474
0.0040
4.264P
2.7504
0.0210
10.5214
1.4955
2.1076
0.4257
0.4347
2.1327
o.i?ee
5.1143
B.8188
1.6693
0.0927
0.4865
3.4246
0.0671
3.1468
0.3225
o.oooo
0.0244
0.0000
0.5961
0.0000
0.0047
DIFFERENCE
to.1667
tO.0592
to.0028
tO.0575
tO.1447
to.0194
tO.0601
tO.0053
tO.0000
tO.1365
tO.1506
to.0000
*0.0282
tO.2782
tO.0702
tO.1545
to.0900
to.1427
to.0882
tO.0261
to.0140
tO.0073
-0.9269
tO.0541
to.1897
to.1151
to.0052
to.0021
tO.0026
tO.0131
to.2649
to.0002
tO.0241
tO.1290
to.0010
to.4935
tO.0701
fO.0986
to.0199
to.0203
tO.1001
tO.0060
to.2399
+0.4136
to.0783
tO.0044
t0.022B
-3.2334
-0.0223
+0.0672
tO.0151
+0,0000
+0.0011
+0.0000
+0.0280
+0.0000
+0.0003
U.S. TOTALS
2,557,391
2,437,452
-119,939
100.0000
100.0000
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLt 31
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIU
OKHHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
HISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
197P NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE 3F NATIONAL NEEDS
FDR CORRECTION OF MAJBR REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY III &
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
2,376
B*
860
2,016
8*. 130
90,*25
18,881
*95
0
0
1,560
0
315
3,858
15,720
2D8
16,83*
0
12,3*9
1*,059
1,3*7,912
61,937
81,022
12,*93
0
7,323
1,479
0
369
16,*"iO
1<*1*
1,233
2,762,267
0
1,5*2
8,031
20,951
38,901
0
2,565
0
1 ,19*
0
67,52*
0
10,896
1,529
60,056
665
159,638
0
1.1B9
0
0
9,218
0
0
C.QSIS
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
2,376
8*
860
2,016
B*,100
90,*25
18,881
*95
0
0
1,560
0
315
3,858
15,720
208
16,83*
0
12,3*9
1*,059
1,3*7,912
61 ,937
32,685
12,*93
0
7,323
1,*79
0
369
16,440
1 ,41*
1 ,203
2,762 ,267
0
1 ,542
8,031
20,961
38,901
0
2,565
0
1,19*
0
67,52*
0
10,896
1 ,529
60,056
665
143,853
0
1,189
0
0
9,211-
C
0
DIFFERENCE
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+0
+0
+ 0
+0
+0
+0
+0
+0
+0
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+ 0
-*8,337
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
-15,755
+0
+ 0
+ 0
+0
+ 0
+0
+ 0
1
1978 STA
ESTIMATI
0.0*130
0.0016
0.017*
0.0*07
1.7017
1.8297
0.3820
0.0100
0.0000
o.oooo
0.0315
0.0000
0.0063
0.07BO
0.3180
0.00*2
0.3*06
0.0000
0.2*96
0.28**
27.2751
1.2533
1.639*
0.2527
0.0000
0.1481
0.0299
0.0000
0.007*
0.3326
0.028f.
0.02*3
55.89*7
O.OCOO
0.0312
'0.1625
0.42*1
0.7671
0.0000
0.0519
o.ooou
0.02*1
O.QOOO
1.3663
0.0000
0.2204
0.0309
1.2152
0.0134
3.23C2
0.0000
0.0240
O.OCOO
0.0000
O.ltf,5
O.OCOO
0.0000
EtBCEN.IAfiE_OE_l!lAI.lDM4L_IBI4LS.
1976 FPA
ASSESSMENT DIFFERENCE
0.0487
0.0017
0.0176
0.0*13
1. 1.4538
0.3P70
0.0101
0.0000
0.0000
0.0319
0.0000
0.0064
0.0790
0.322?
0.00*2
0.3*51
0.0000
0.2531
0.28B2
27.6336
1.2697
0.6700
0.2561
0.0000
0.1501
0.0303
C.fcOOO
0.0075
0.3370
0.0269
0.0246
56.6295
0.0000
0.0316
0.*2«7
0.7975
0.0000
0.05 25
0.0000
0.0?**
0.0000
1.3843
0.0000
0.2233
0.0313
1.23J2
0.0136
0.0000
0.02*3
0.0000
O.COOO
0.1SU9
0.0000
0.0000
+0.0007
+0.0001
*0.0002
+0.0006
•tO.022*
+0.02*1
+0.0050
+0.0001
+0.0000
+O.QOOO
+0.000*
+0.0000
+0.0001
+0.0010
+0.00*2
+0.0000
+0.00*5
+0.0000
+0.0033
+0.0038
+0.3585
+0.016*
-0.9693
+0.003*
+0.0000
+0.0020
+0.000*
+0.0000
+0.0001
+0.00**
+0.0003
+0.0003
+0.73*8
+0.0000
+0.000*
+0.0021
+0.0056
+0,010*
+0,0000
+0.0006
+0.0000
+0.0003
+0.0000
+0.01SO
+0.0000
+0.0029
+0.000*
+0.0160
+0.000?
-o.zeio
+0.0000
+0.0003
+0.0000
+0.0000
+0.002*
+0.0000
+0.0000
U.S. TOTALS
*,9*1,
*.877,7Be.
-6*,122
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 32
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE 3F NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ELIGIBLE NEW COLLECTORS AND APPURTENANCES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY IV A
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
01 ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
PECRGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAIME
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
HISSISSIPP1
MISSOURI
MONTANA
SEE*ASKA
NEVADA
NE*f HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NfW YORK
N3RTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OSEGtlN
PENNSYLVANIA
RHOOE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WE?T VIRGINIA
hi SCOMSI'i
WYOMING
A^E^ICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERP.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
331 ,636
40,968
118,578
134,018
1,415,363
28,712
405,113
41,745
0
1,560,561
378,532
198,066
112,352
162,096
338,590
123,294
121,127
575,541
320,902
220,290
223,637
754,897
993, P82
153,599
157,969
228,977
23,787
32,58B
38,234
269,549
655,609
42,709
2,576,005
479,955
3.5B4
683, 61B
139,423
287,903
985,029
260,744
314, HI
8,679
512,333
566, B82
61 ,450
77,557
438,91?
460,554
514,779
282,106
1 ,?44
9,44';-
096
17,992
257,815
32,783
11,303
_ C.BSIS
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
331,636
40,968
118,578
134,016
1,415,363
28,712
405,113
41,745
0
1,560,561
378,532
198,066
112,352
152,896
338,590
123,294
121,127
575,541
320,902
220,290
221,064
754,897
987,421
153,599
157,989
228, B18
23,797
32,588
36,204
269,549
655,609
42,709
2,436,873
479,955
3,5B4
683,618
139,423
287,903
982 ,675
260,744
314,611
5,701
512,333
566, 8S2
61 ,460
77,557
438,912
460,554
514,779
269,37?
1 ,244
9,445
996
17,992
257,485
32,783
11 ,303
DIFFERENCE
tO
+ 0
+ 0
tO
tO
tO
to
tO
tO
tO
+ 0
+ 0
to
to
to
tO
tO
tO
to
to
-2,573
tO
-6,461
tO
tO
-159
tO
to
to
tO
tO
tO
-139,132
to
to
to
to
tO
-2,354
to
+ 0
-2,978
to
tO
to
tO
tC
tO
tO
-12,711
tC
t()
tC
to
-33C
tO
tO
EEBtE
1976 STATE
ESTIMATE
1.7262
0.2134
0.6179
0.6983
7.3757
0.1496
2.1111
0.2175
0.0000
8.1323
1.9725
1.0321
0.5854
0.8488
1.76*4
0.6*25
0.6312
2.9992
1.6722
1.1*79
1.1654
3.9339
5.1793
0.8004
0.8233
1.1932
0.1239
0.1696
0.1990
1.404b
3.4165
0.2225
13.4240
2.5011
0.0166
3.5624
0.7265
1.5003
5.1331
1.3587
1.6394
0.0452
2.6698
2.95*1
0.3202
0.4041
2.287?
2.4000
2.6826
1.4701
0.0064
0.0492
0.0061
0.0937
1.3435
0.1706
0.0566
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
1.7433
0.2153
0.6233
0.7045
7.4*03
0.1509
2.1296
0.2194
0.0000
8.2036
1.9898
1.0*11
0.5906
0.8563
1.7799
0.6*81
0.6367
3.0255
1.6869
1.1580
1.1620
3.9683
5.1907
0.8074
0.8305
1.2026
0.1250
0.1713
0.2008
1.4169
3.4464
0.2245
12.8103
2.5230
0.018P
3.5936
0.7329
I. 5134
5.1657
1.3706
1.6538
0.0299
2.6932
2.9800
0.3230
0.4076
2.3072
2.4210
2.7061
1.4160
0.0065
0.0496
0.0052
0.0945
1.3535
0.1723
0.0594
DIFFERENCE
tO.0151
+0.0018
+0.005*
+0.0061
+0.06*6
+0.0013
+0.016*
+0.0018
+0.0000
+0.0712
+0.0172
+0.0090
+0.0051
+0.0074
+0.015*
+0.0056
+0.0055
+0.0262
+0.01*6
+0.0100
-0.0033
+0.03**
+0.011*
+0.0070
+0.0072
+0.0096
+0.0010
+0.001*
+0.0017
+0.0123
+0.0299
+0.0019
-0.6137
+0.
-------
FFfiRUiRY 10,
TJBLE 33
1S7B NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW INTERCEPTORS AND APPURTENANCES
THOUSANDS OF 1976 DOLLARS
CATEGORY IV B
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
01 ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
CEOSGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WlSCONS1N
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MAR UNAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PIC. TP. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
180,667
95,171
199,738
99,140
1 ,627,446
266,062
182,421
121,632
0
1,462,342
410,509
319,745
84,550
283,432
311,356
201 ,978
289,833
385,922
294,689
154,585
395,334
543,030
676,246
247,995
168,982
678,294
20,353
50,403
44,552
295,824
601 ,439
32,651
1,936,911
438,387
14,829
825,198
129,107
301 ,060
532,285
100,638
251 ,738
31,296
365, B40
1,002,414
57,760
31,260
515,021
481,274
189,59]
335,277
9,645
23,790
3,770
21 ,000
326,808
15,64?
16,277
C.Q5I5
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
180,667
95,171
199,786
99,140
1,627,446
266,062
182,421
120,456
0
1,462,342
410,509
319,745
64,550
282,361
311,356
201,978
289,833
385,922
294,689
154,565
323,065
543,030
671 ,499
247.995
168,982
678,294
20,353
50,403
33,423
295,824
601,439
32,651
1,863,849
438,387
14,629
825,198
129,107
301,060
529,130
100,638
251,738
29,799
365,840
1,002,366
57,760
31 ,260
515,021
461,274
189,591
301 ,991
9,645
23,790
3,770
21 ,000
320,027
15,64;
16,277
DIFFERENCE
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
+ 0
-1 ,176
tO
tO
to
tO
+ 0
-1,071
tO
+0
tO
+ 0
to
tO
-72,269
tO
-4,747
tO
to
tO
tO
+ 0
-11 ,129
+ 0
+ 0
tO
-73,062
tO
tO
+ 0
+0
to
-3,155
tO
tO
-1,497
*0
-48
to
to
to
to
+0
-33 » 2d6
+ 0
to
tO
tO
-6,731
*0
tO
EtEQE
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
0.9670
0.5093
1.0693
0.5306
6.7107
1.4240
0.9763
0.6510
0.0000
7.8270
2.1972
1.7114
0.4525
1.517C
1 .6665
1.0810
1.5513
2.0656
1.5772
0.8274
2.115S
2.9065
3.6195
1.3273
0.9044
3.6305
0.1069
0.2697
0.2384
1.5633
3.2191
0.1747
10.3671
2.3464
0.0793
4.4167
0.6910
1 .6113
2.8490
0.5386
1 .3474
0.1675
1.9581
5. 3653.
0.3C91
0.1673
2.7566
2.5759
1 .0147
1.794t
0.0516
0.1273
0.020]
0.1124
1.7492
C.OS3-/
0.0671
T97B EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.9778
0.5151
1.0F13
0.5366
8.8089
1.4401
0.9873
0.6519
0.0000
7.9152
2.2219
1.7306
0.4576
1.52S3
l.f.852
1.0932
1.5687
2.0PP?
1.5950
O.f 367
1.7486
2.9392
3.6346
1.3423
0.9146
3. (714
0.1101
0.272P
0.1808
1.6012
3.2554
0.1 767
10.0884
2.3728
0.0802
4.4665
0.6988
1.6295
2.8640
0.5447
1.3625
0.1612
1.9801
5.425r-
0.3126
0. 1691
?.lf 76
2.604P
1.0261
1.634b
0.0521
0. 1287
0.020?
0.1 136
1 .7322
0.&H46
O.OPFO
DIFFERENCE
to.OJOB
+0.0058
tO.0120
to.0060
to.0982
+0.0161
+0.0110
+0.0009
+0.0000
+0.0882
+0.0247
+0.0192
+0.0051
+0.0113
+0.0187
+0.0122
+0.0174
+0.0232
+0.0178
+0.0093
-0.3672
+0.0377
+0.0151
+0.0150
+0.0102
+0.0409
+0.0012
+0.0031
-0.0574
+0.0179
+0.0363
+0.0020
-0.2785
+0.0264
+0.0009
to.0498
+0.0078
+0.0182
+0.0150
+0.006]
+0.0151
-0.0062
+0.0220
+0.0602
+0.0035
+0.0018
+0.0310
+0.0290
+0.0]14
to .0005
+0.0014
to.0002
tO.0012
-0.0169
+0.0009
to.0009
16,683,191 18,474,970
JOO.OOCG
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 34
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
01 ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SQUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
197b NEEDS SURVEY
COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CORRECTION OF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORY V
COSTS PERCFNTAGE DF NATID
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
I
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
9
,186
398
128
170
8
218
57
,131
,920
192
209
592
,092
147
,036
,602
187
33
757
33
70
272
,009
,305
67
13
,261
431
,198
329
24
198
39
2
208
272
893
754
268
3
19
0
,165
0
0
,676
661
,912
,961
,671
,533
,732
0
,256
,730
,755
,885
,776
,419
0
,520
,131
,200
,291
.214
,286
,919
,236
,806
0
,996
,763
0
,138
,342
,705
,614
0
,333
.106
,342
0
,057
,462
,148
,199
,981
,811
,318
,231
,905
,164
0
0
0
,360
0
0
1978 EPA
ASSESSMENT
9
167
39B
128
170
8
218
57
2,131
2,920
192
209
592
1,092
147
1,036
1,602
187
33
757
33
70
272
1,009
3,305
67
13
3,261
431
2,198
329
24
196
39
2
206
272
893
754
268
3
19
0
,165
0
0
.715
661
,912
,961
,671
,533
,732
0
,256
,730
,755
,885
,776
,419
0
,520
,131
,200
,291
.214
.286
,919
,236
,806
0
,996
,763
0
,138
,342
,705
,614
0
.333
.106
,342
0
,057
,462
,148
,199
,981
,811
,318
,201
,905
,164
0
0
0
,360
0
0
DIFFERENCE
tO
tO
tO
tO
-1 , OIK, 961
to
to
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
tO
tO
to
tO
to
tO
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
tO
tO
to
tO
tO
tO
to
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
to
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
10
0
0
2
0
4
0
3
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
3
0
12
0
0
12
0
1
a
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0000
.0342
.0000
.0000
.4342
.0024
.490t
.461fc
.6377
.0316
.8173
.0000
.2139
.9656
.9139
.7207
.7836
.2136
.0000
.0624
.5497
.8719
.9672
.6995
.1243
.8321
.1241
.2645
.0000
.0201
.7731
.0000
.3502
.2516
.0512
.1676
.oooc
.6117
.2136
.2306
.0000
.0896
.7415
.1462
.0082
.7808
.0194
.3380
.8182
.0046
.0116
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0723
.0000
.0000
197!) EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
11.
0.
0.
2.
0.
4.
0.
4.
6.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
0.
12.
0.
0.
12.
0.
1.
8.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0000
0355
0000
0000
6514
0025
5496
5009
6629
0331
B496
OOCO
2224
280f>
3459
7492
8148
3012
0000
2439
5715
0252
2242
7272
1292
9441
]290
2750
0000
0604
9225
0000
8391
2615
0532
6700
0000
6755
5387
2793
0000
0934
7709
1520
0085
8117
0597
4701
9297
0445
0122
0000
0000
0000
0751
0000
0000
DIFFERENCE
to.0000
tO.0013
to.0000
to.0000
-3.7826
tO.0001
to.0590
tO.0191
tO.0252
tO.0013
tO.0323
tO.0000
to.0085
tO.3152
to.4320
to.0285
tO.0310
to.0876
tO.0000
to.1615
tO.0218
tO.1533
tO.2370
to.0277
to.0049
tO.1120
tO.0049
tO.0105
to.0000
tO.0403
to.1494
to.0000
tO.4889
to.0099
to.0020
tO.4824
tO.0000
to.0638
to.3251
to.0467
tO.0000
tO.0036
to.0294
to.0058
tO.0003
tO.0309
tO.0403
tO.1321
tO.1115
to.0397
to.0004
to.0000
tO.0000
tO.0000
tO.0028
tO.0000
+0.0000
U.S. TOTALS
26,761,680 25,742,719 -1,018,961
100.0000
100.0000
tO.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10.
TAfLE 35
ALAHA1&
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
C6LIF3RNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEL'RGl A
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLIMQIS
INDIANA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
KS1NE
."URYLAND
MSSSACHU SETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEtRASKA
NEVADA
NErt HAMPSHIRE
NEk JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NE* YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
hi SCflNSIN
WY01ING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUA1
MARIANAS GROUP
PJERTD RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
197P NEEDS SURVEY
C3T.TS AND PERCENTAGE JF NATIONAL NL-fcC.S
FOK TREATMENT AND/OS CONTROL OF STQRMWATERS
THOUSANDS OF 1378 DOLLARS
CATEGORY VI
1976 STiTE
ESTIMATE
1,428,370
122,010
531,491
610,525
4.047.F76
319,494
2,441,443
270,333
184,55]
6,909,125
1,068,665
205,653
41,671
1,855,135
1,633,752
482,182
418,739
925,625
940,536
679,136
1 ,191,849
3,205,35]
1,719,430
527,839
415, 336
1 ,172,799
26,079
131 ,578
217,645
958,894
5,378,994
84,984
2,026,998
777,296
16,779
3,558,954
411,953
901,669
2,609,314
347,016
379,731
30,032
1 ,313,997
3,773,298
171 ,921
30,824
1,975,668
1,374,248
220,130
1,230,055
0
0
0
0
404,121
0
0
C.QS.IS.
1078 tPA
ASSESSMENT
l,4tb.37C
122,010
531,491
610,525
4,047,876
319,494
2,441,443
270,383
184,561
6,909,125
1,068,665
205,653
41 ,671
1,855,135
1,633,752
482,182
418,709
925,625
940,536
679,106
1,191,849
3,205,351
1,719,430
527,889
415,338
1,172,799
26,079
131,578
217,645
958,894
5,378,994
84,98.4
2,025,998
777,296
16,779
3,558,964
411,963
901,669
2,609,314
347,316
379,781
30,032
1,313.997
3,773,298
171,921
0
1,975,668
1,374,248
220,100
1,230,055
0
0
0
t
434,121
0
0
DIFFERENCE
40
40
4D
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
to
+ 0
to
tO
to
t-0
to
to
tO
to
+ 0
40
+ 0
tO
40
40
40
40
tO
tO
tO
tO
to
to
40
to
40
to
to
40
to
-30,324
to
40
40
40
40
40
40
tO
tO
tO
to
EERCf.
1978 STATE
ESTIMATE
2.3149
0.1977
0.8613
0.9694
6.5604
0.5176
3.95tb
0.4382
0.2991
11 .1977
1.7320
0.3333
0.067§
3.00fct
2.6476
0.7814
0.6786
1.5001
1.5243
1.1006
1.9316
5.1949
2.7867
0.8555
0.673]
1.9007
0.0422
0.2132
0.3527
1.5540
8.7178
0.1377
3.2851
1.2597
0.0271
5.7680
0.6676
1.4613
4.2289
0.5624
0.6155
0.0486
2.1296
6.1154
0.2786
0.0499
3.2019
2.2272
0.3567
1.9935
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.6549
0.0000
0.0000
kJJ&IzE, QE N.A.XJ.U!
197U EPA
ASSESSMENT
2.3161
0.1«7B
0.8618
O.V899
6.5637
0.5180
3.9588
0.4384
0.2992
11.2033
1.7328
0.3334
0.0675
3.0081
2.6491
0.7P1F
G.67E.9
1.5009
1.5250
1.1011
1.9326
5.1975
2.7880
O.B559
0.6734
1.9017
0.0422
0.2133
0.3529
1.5548
8.7221
0.1377
3.2868
1.2603
0.0271
5.7709
0.6679
1.4620
4.2310
0.5626
0.6158
0.0486
2.1306
6.1184
0.2787
0.0000
3.2035
2.2283
0.3568
1.9945
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.6552
0.0000
o.ooco
61t701,176 61,670,352
-30,
100.0000
100.0000
DIFFERENCE
40.0012
40.0001
40.0005
40.0005
40.0033
40.0002
40.0020
40.0002
+0.0001
+0.0056
+0.0008
+0.0001
40.0000
40.0015
40.0013
+0.0004
+0.0003
40.0008
40.0007,
+0.0005
+0.0010
+0.0026
+0.0013
40.0004
40.0003
+0.0010
+0.0000
+0.0001
+0.0002
+0.0008
+0.0043
+0.0000
+0.0017
+0.0006
+0.0000
40.0029
+0.0003
+0,0007
+0.0021
+0.0002
40.0003
40.0000
+0.0010
+0.0030
+0.0001
-0.0498
+0.0016
+0.0011
+0.0001
+0.0010
+0.0000
+0.0000
+O.OOOO
+0.0000
+0.0003
+0.0000
40.0000
40.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TSBLE 36
1979
197E NEEDS SURVEY
EPA BACKLOG ESTIMATES
FDR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED HASTfcWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
MILLIONS Of 1978 DOLLARS
ALOAMA
ALASKA
tRIZDNA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DFLAHARE
DI5T. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
Hftk'AII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
1 NO I ASIA
ID.*/.
KA»'S4S
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAI JH
MARYLAND
NA'SACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
K.J MM<:C,OTA
1*1 {, 3ISSI"PI
MISSOURI
MSTANA
MEVS:U
NEn HAMPSHIRF
hEH JERSEY
MM "it'XJCO
Nli. YORK
NOSTil C«»OLINA
NCKTH DAKOTA
CHIT
C«L JriUMA
CKF.GOM
PENNSYLVANIA
PHflF ISLAND
SDl T'-f CAROLINA
SUUTH P4K.OTS
TL \NPSSE E
Tf MS
UltH
vr '.'TINT
V).. ',!><<
37
1C
36
1 ,066
62
30
79
165
•
124
37
t:C
47(.
1
L1
C
C
11
U
u
10,654
SUE TO RUUNO-
III A
S6
30
1
29
75
10
31
2
0
70
78
0
14
144
36
30
48
74
45
13
7
3
43
2d
>3
59
2
1
1
,S
137
0
1J3
67
J
256
36
51
10
10
31
3
124
214
40
">
11
13
1
76
7
0
0
0
14
a
0
<• , 4 3 7
OFF 3
HI B
2
0
0
2
84
90
ie
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
15
0
16
0
12
14
1 ,347
61
32
12
0
6
1
0
0
16
1
1
7,762
0
1
i>
17
3b
0
2
0
1
0
67
0
10
1
60
0
143
0
1
0
0
9
0
0
4 ,871
IV A
331
40
118
134
1 ,415
28
405
41
0
1,560
378
198
112
162
338
123
121
575
320
220
221
754
987
153
157
228
23
32
38
269
655
42
2,436
479
3
683
139
287
962
260
314
»=,
512
566
61
77
438
460
514
2S9
1
9
0
17
257
32
1 1
I1', 022
V B
37
34
33
18
396
1
116
49
0
196
77
106
18
140
121?
105
117
P.I
BO
9P
98
326
447
142
49
355
6
10
10
1P1
140
7
901
93
0
309
36
67
27"
91
34
1
92
140
IP
23
274
124
153
13E
0
14
1
11
261
6
5
V
0
9
0
0
167
0
398
128
170
S
218
0
57
2 ,131
2,S20
192
209
592
0
1 ,0<>2
147
1 ,036
1,602
167
33
757
33
70
0
272
1 ,009
0
3,305
67
13
3,261
0
431
2,198
329
0
24
198
39
2
£08
272
U93
7' 4
26?
3
0
0
0
1 ?
0
0
VI
1.212
44
235
373
3,113
201
2,243
178
84
3,542
765
117
24
1,451
1,353
409
228
529
781
267
1,043
2,772
1,520
461
336
1,062
21
90
113
174
4,162
54
1 ,877
649
9
3,138
310
501
2.539
360
334
21
98B
2,164
154
0
1,222
1,031
189
900
0
0
0
0
335
0
0
2f ,74?
45,704
-------
rcrRU/S«Y 10, 1979
TAbLE 37
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
BACKLOG COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED -4ASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES _1_IU&U~Y_
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
1978
BACKLOG
633,901
2B2.392
203,488
264,904
3,827,186
206,260
1,246,095
232,238
186,077
2,662,374
1,168,453
495,130
293,846
3,670,164
3,814,181
909,552
700,234
1,623,014
563,070
1,553,022
2,342,971
2,963,378
3,935,794
922.125
586,860
1,985,067
84,010
234,852
90,664
966,759
2,716,182
84,403
12,509,049
1,152,602
30,654
5,524,995
278,504
1,033,644
4,582,01?
926,019
536,750
108,951
1,310,499
1 ,305,761
285,418
441,786
1,379,406
2,005,510
1,728,048
1,437,545
44,337
37,038
18,914
36,261
753,478
62,326
30,990
CUSIS
2000 EPA
ASSESSMENT
947,377
515,777
512,875
501 ,930
6,041,449
948, H28
1,363,067
389,310
186,077
4,976,527
1,755,995
859,176
446,643
4,105,636
4,205,646
1,096,588
1,103,188
2,085,385
1,136,673
1,638,839
2,910,164
3,426,945
4,485,332
1,347,694
774,969
2,535,324
125,986
317,681
260,078
1,154,711
4,196,374
158,752
14,156,469
1,657,975
82,352
6,777,949
572,101
1,536,102
5,356,454
945,772
840,375
207,041
1,757,853
3,110,742
399,396
460,989
2,008,651
2,761,303
1,845,897
1,797,595
75,094
57,318
44,858
56,322
977,206
90,287
44,120
DIFFERENCE
+263,476
+233,335
+309,387
+237,026
+4,214,261
+ 742,568
+ 136,972
+157,072
+ 0
+2,314,153
+587,542
+364 ,046
+152,795
+435,672
+ 391,465
+137,036
+402,954
+462,371
+573,803
+85,917
+567,293
+463,567
+549,538
+425,569
+188,109
+550,257
+41,976
+82,829
+169,414
+187,952
+1,480,192
+74,349
+1,647,420
+505,373
+51,698
+1,252,954
+293,597
+502,458
+776,442
+ 19,753
+303 ,625
+98,090
+447,354
+-1,804,981
+113,978
+19,203
+630,245
+755,793
+11 7,849
+360,050
+30,757
+30,280
+25,944
+20 ,061
+ 223,728
+27 ,961
+13,130
197h
BACKLOG
0.8650
0.3573
0.2573
0.3350
4.8409
0.2606
1 .5761
0.2937
0.2353
3. 3676
1.4779
0.6262
0.3716
4 .6423
4.8245
1.1504
0.8857
2.0529
0.7122
1.9644
2.9634
3.7463
4.97B3
1. 1663
0.7423
2.5108
0.1062
0.2970
0.1146
1.2228
3.4356
0.1067
15.8226
1.4579
0.0387
6.9865
0.3522
1 .3074
5.7957
1 .1713
0 .6789
0.1378
1.6576
1.6516
0.3610
0.5568
1 .7435
2 .5367
2.1857
1.8183
0 . 0560
0.0468
0.0239
0 . 045fe
0.9530
0 .07P&
0.0391
EEB£EI!(I&eE_O.E-tlAIJ[«UL._iei4LS.
2000 EPA
ASSEbSMfNT DIFFERENCE
O.H924
0.4E-5F
0.4fi31
0.472B
7.575?
3.693S
\.AQ2t
0.3667
0.1752
4.68BO
1.654?
0.8093
0.4207
3. B6,78
3.
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TAPLE 38
1979
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
OACKLQG COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT PLANTS
THOUSANDS OF 1978 COLLARS
CATEGORIES I AND II
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AR]ZOMA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
L'IST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
i BAH a
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IDKA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEd JERSEY
MEN MEXICO
NEW YORK*
NORTH CAROLINA
N3RTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
ORE SON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
kEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYCHING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUA1
MAKlANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS
COSTS 1
1978
BACKLOG
1
1
2
1
1
0
225
166
49
80
,688
74
275
9
15
825
414
190
90
,086
377
407
186
298
103
122
521
779
822
398
247
576
16
119
39
219
771
32
,99B
444
10
,005
48
156
,111
231
136
73
382
276
162
118
378
384
303
543
31
11
15
7
191
22
14
,297
,676
,476
,384
.235
,620
,564
,546
,320
,406
,426
,36?
,99P
,520
,956
,039
,502
,941
,220
,655
,515
,024
,831
.397
,587
,113
,888
,582
,954
,782
,955
,493
,597
,901
,867
,375
,978
,486
,642
.906
,467
.117
.403
.669
,600
,216
,229
,855
,075
,286
,6*0
,553
,885
,969
,009
.264
,752
.271
,981
2000
EPA
ASSESSMENT
346
339
19?
236
4,671
552
346
94
15
1,874
668
341
177
1,380
582
497
417
457
463
143
863
1,027
1,147
718
316
B03
44
162
186
293
1,790
82
3,684
605
48
1,743
246
425
1,638
241
222
143
556
1,219
237
130
768
782
385
736
53
22
39
17
356
41
16
35,597
,059
,630
,2DO
,892
,591
,880
,503
,873
,406
,127
,389
,336
,542
,378
,732
,918
,503
,3?3
,OB8
,812
,742
,054
,576
,291
,128
,136
,423
,f!13
,742
,083
,495
,091
,387
,250
,178
,033
,156
,526
,155
,865
,042
.149
,558
,866
,288
,035
,518
,627
,025
,769
,178
,894
,496
,330
,585
,862
,425
,985
DIFFERENCE
+ 120
+ 173
+ 142
+ 156
+2,982
+ 478
+ 70
+ S5
+1,046
+ 254
+ 150
+87
+293
+ 205
+90
+ 230
+ 159
+ 359
+ 21
+ 342
+ 247
+ 325
+319
+69
+226
+27
+ 42
+ 146
+73
+1,019
+ 49
+635
+ 160
+37
+ 737
+ 197
+268
+ 526
+ 10
+85
+ 69
+ 173
+943
+ 75
+ 11
+389
+ 398
+81
+ 193
+ 21
+ 11
+ 23
+ 10
+ 165
+ 19
+ 2
+ 15,300
,333
,154
,B16
,657
,971
,316
,957
,553
+ 0
,701
,027
,340
,022
,422
,693
,416
,562
,103
.433
,297
,718
• 223
,179
,704
,015
,248
,841
,859
,960
,128
,002
,494
,436
,333
,803
,055
,670
,884
,257
,418
,925
,746
,889
,266
,072
,806
,663
,552
,739
,129
,625
,009
,527
.321
,321
,110
.154
,004
1576
BACKLOG
1
0
0
0
8
0
1
0
0
4
2
0
0
5
1
2
0
1
0
0
2
3
4
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
3
0
14
2
0
4
0
0
5
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
.1118
.8201
.2432
.3952
.3191
.3673
.3575
.0459
.0768
.0665
.0413
.9409
.4459
.3549
.8575
.0075
.9209
.4692
.5106
.6035
.5668
.8419
.0516
.9636
.2174
.8420
.0816
.5909
. 1959
.0836
.8006
.1605
.7743
.1916
.0511
.9560
.2388
.7717
.4779
.1403
.6705
.3616
.8852
.3626
.7991
.5824
.8664
.8921
.49*1
.6762
.1554
.0585
.0786
.0345
.9*22
.1120
.0703
.0000
2000 EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.9721
0.9540
0.5399
0.6654
13.1231
1.5531
0.9733
0.2665
0.0432
5.2646
1.8776
0.958P
0.4987
3.8776
.6369
.3987
.172S
.2846
.3008
0.4039
2.4263
2.8851
3.2237
2.0177
0.8880
2.2561
0.12*7
0.4573
0.5245
0.8233
5.0297
0.2306
10.3499
1.7002
0.1353
4.8964
0.6914
1.195?
4.601S
0.6794
0.6237
0.4021
1.5634
3.4267
0.6665
0.3652
2.1588
2.1985
1.0815
2.0696
0.1493
0.0643
0.1109
0.0486
1.0016
0.1175
0.0*61
100.0000
DIFFERENCE
-0.1396
+0.1339
+0.2967
+0.2702
+4.80*0
+1.1858
-0.38*1
+0.2206
-0.0325
+1.1981
-0.1636
+0.0179
+ 0.0528
-l.*772
-0.2205
-0.6087
+0.2519
-0.18*5
+0.7902
-0.1995
-0.1*04
-0.9567
-0.8278
+0.05*1
-0.3293
-0.5858
+0.0*31
-0.1335
+0.3286
-0.2602
+1.2289
+0.0701
-4.42*3
-0.4913
+0.08*2
-0.0595
+0.4526
+0.*236
-0.8760
-O.*608
-0.0*67
+0.0*05
-0.3217
+2.06*1
-0.1325
-0.2171
+0.292*
+0.306*
-O.*125
-0.6085
-0.0060
+0.0058
+0.0323
+0.01*1
+0.059*
+0.0055
-0.02*1
+0.0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLE 39
1979
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
BACKLOG COSTS AND PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL NEEDS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED MASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
CATEGORIES I, II AND IV B
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEH HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
V1K5IN ISLANDS
1978
BACKLOG
263,250
201,416
8Zt631
99,006
2,084,776
76,374
391,952
58,752
15,406
1,022,316
491,805
297,037
109,297
1,227,067
502,625
512,860
304,382
380,874
183,974
212,580
619,514
1 ,106,590
1,269,571
540,717
297,001
932,233
22,800
130,387
50,751
400,955
911,742
40,393
3,900,896
538,264
11,309
1,315,277
85,326
224,139
1,390,853
322,770
170,155
74,858
475,044
417,380
181 ,070
142,092
653,323
508,108
456,767
678,710
32,066
26,404
17,322
18,269
452,884
29,543
19,572
C.Q5.IS
2300 EPA
ASSESSMENT
525,726
434,801
391,988
336,032
6,299,037
818,942
528,924
215,329
15,406
3,336,469
1,078,898
661,083
262,092
1 ,662,739
894,090
599,896
707,336
343,245
757,777
293,397
1,186,807
1,570,084
1,819,075
966,286
485,110
1,481,430
64,776
213,216
220,165
586,907
2,391 ,934
114,742
5,548,236
1,043,637
63,007
2,563,231
375,263
725,586
2,107,295
342,523
473,780
172, 94e
922,398
2,222,232
295, 04E
161,295
1,283,539
1,263,901
574,616
1,038,760
62,823
46,684
43,266
38,330
676,612
67,504
32. 702
DIFFERENCE
+263,476
+233,385
+309,357
+237,026
+4.214.Z51
+742,568
+136,972
+156,577
+ 0
+2,314,153
+587,093
+364,046
+152,795
+435,672
+391 ,465
+187,036
+402,954
+462,371
+573,803
+85,817
+567,293
+463,494
+549,504
+425,569
+188,109
+549,197
+41,976
+82,829
+169,414
+137,952
+1,480,192
+74,349
+1,647,340
+505,373
+51,698
+1 ,252,954
+239,937
+502,447
+ 776,442
+19,753
+303,625
+98,090
+447,354
+1,304,852
+113,978
+19,203
+530,216
+755,733
+117, b49
+360,050
+30,757
+20,230
+25,944
*2C,051
*223,728
+27,941
+ 13, HO
|
1978
BACKLOG
0.9755
0.7464
0.3062
0.3669
7.7261
0.2830
1.4525
0.2177
0.0570
3.7886
1.8226
i .looe
0.4050
4.5474
1.8627
1.9006
1.1280
1.4115
0.6816
0.787fc
2.2959
4.1009
4.7050
2.0036
1.1006
3.454t
0.0844
0.4832
0.1680
1.4859
3.3786
0.1496
14.4566
1.9947
0.0419
4.8743
0.3162
0.8306
5.1544
1.1961
0.6305
0.2774
1.7605
1.5466
0.6710
0.5265
2.4212
i.eeao
1.6S2?
2.5152
o.iiefc
0.0976
0.0641
0.0677
1.671-3
0. lCf.<,
0.072"
2000 EPA
ASSESSMENT
0.9741
0.8041
0.7249
0.6214
11.6491
l.?145
0.97S1
0.3982
0.0284
6.1703
l.°952
1.2225
0.4847
3.0749
1.6534
1.2943
1.3081
1.5594
1.4013
0.5518
2.1948
2.9036
3.3641
1.7870
0.3971
2.7396
0.1197
0.3943
3.4071
1.0890
4.4235
0.2121
10.2606
1.9300
0.116*
4.7491;
0.6°3°
1.3437
4.0080
0.6334
0.&761
0.3198
1.7C5P
4.1096
C.54-56
0.2982
2.3737
2.3373
l.Ut2t
1.9210
0.1161
0.016?
C.OPOO
0.070P
1.2M2
0.1063
'1.060'
DIFFERENCE
-C.0013
<0.0577
+0.4187
+0.2545
+3.9230
+1.2315
-0.4743
+0.1805
-0.0285
+2.3817
+0.1726
+0.1217
+0.0797
-1.4724
-0.2092
-0.6062
+0.1801
+0.1479
+0.7195
-0.2359
-0.1010
-1.1972
-1.3408
-0.2167
-0.2034
-0.7151
+0.0353
-0.08S8
+0.2191
-0.3968
+1.0447
+0.0625
-4.1959
-0.0646
+0.0746
-0.1247
+ 0.3777
+0.5131
-1.1463
-0.5626
+0.2456
+0.0424
-0.0546
+2.5628
-0.1253
-0.2282
-0.0474
+ 0.45<,3
-0.6300
-0.5941
-0.0026
-0.0114
+ C.OI')9
+0.0031
-C.4270
-0.0030
-0.0120
U.S. TOTALS
26,933,43':
54,07?,955
100.00CO
»C .0000
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 40
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
6ACKLOG PER CAPITA COSTS
FDR CONSTRUCTION' 3F PUBLICLY-QHNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORIES 1 THRU V
f Lf.JAMA
ALASKA
AF IZDNA
Af-KANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
H/.W4I1
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
IKDI I^JS
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
KjU ilE
HSRYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NFt-RASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NFW JERSEY
N(-W MEXICO
N£.i YTRK
KfRFH CARDLlNi
NOKTH DAKOTA
EHIO
P«LSHOMA
CKESCIM
PENNSYLVANIA
KHDOE ISLAND
SC.UTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UT/SH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
KtSrilMGTON
ivTST VIRGINIA
tl-,F:95
273,504
1 ,033,644
4.5P2.012
926,019
536,750
10S.951
1,310,499
1,305,761
285,
-------
FEPRUARY 1C,
TABLE 41
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
BACKLOG PER CAPITA C3STS
FOR CONSTRUCTION Of PUBLICLY-OWNED TREATMENT FACILITIES
* THOUSANDS OF 1978 DOLLARS
POPULATIONS IN THOUSANDS
CATEGORIES I II IVB
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAHARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IDHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS GROUP
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
I97B
* BACKLOG
263,250
201,416
82,631
99,006
2,084,776
76,374
391,952
58,752
15,406
1,022,316
491,805
297,037
109,297
1,227,067
502,625
512,860
304,382
380,B74
183,974
212,580
619,514
1,106,590
1,269,571
540,717
297,001
932,233
22,800
130,387
50,751
400,955
911,742
40,393
3,900,896
538,264
11,309
1,315,277
85,326
224,139
1,393,853
322,770
170,155
74,858
475,044
417,380
181,070
142,092
653,323
508,108
456,767
678,710
32,066
26,404
17,322
18,269
452,884
29,543
19,572
1977
POPULATION
3,690
407
2,296
2,144
21,396
2,619
3,108
582
690
8,452
5,048
895
357
11,245
5,330
2,879
2,326
3,458
3,921
1,085
4,139
5,782
9,129
3,975
2,389
4,801
761
1,561
633
349
7,329
1,190
17,324
5,525
653
10,701
2,811
2,376
11,785
935
2,376
589
4,299
12,830
1,268
483
5,135
3,658
1,859
4,651
406
29
93
12
3,282
114
95
BACKLOG
PER CAPITA
71
494
35
46
95
29
126
100
22
120
97
331
127
109
94
178.
130
110
46
195
149
191
139
136
124
194
29
S3
80
472
124
33
217
97
17
122
30
94
118
345
59
108
110
32
142
294
127
138
245
145
78
910
186
1 ,522
137
?59
206
U.S. TOTALS
26,983,435
219,955
1 22
-------
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
ICAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGCN
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMCA
GUAM
MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANCS
1976 HEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF EPA COST ASSESSMENTS BY CATEGORY
CAT I CAT II CAT IIIA CAT IIIB
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 42
CAT IVA
CAT IVB
1,093
4^5
365
It 729
3,330
623
408
88
1
1, 129
1,349
120
568
1,366
1,426
2,093
1, 167
1,273
1,227
574
971
497
It 583
1,251
1,639
2,128
298
781
156
479
632
372
2, 511
1,851
493
2,035
1, 551
652
3,615
96
972
617
967
2,821
619
272
1,142
1,013
1,521
1,409
233
16
12
10
117
79
12
136
201
117
133
1,15£
C
65
177
36
155
279
76
658
427
126
353
119
48
5?
227
141
162
66 1
100
23S
4<*
72
37
IOC
357
216
20?
104
258
5E
688
12
122
267
be
8
K
38
28?
23C
387
22C
98
4
21
34
134
2
1 0
448
105
33
16
17
1
246
165
1
12
281
364
112
5
238
29
20
260
25
142
421
324
25
2
2
7
47
94
1 5
251
348
0
511
303
87
350
7
113
15
188
819
185
31
86
9
87
198
2
0
2
0
5
0
0
146
8
7
48
137
42
38
8
0
1^7
235
5
76
190
94
209
92
145
76
23
22
29
l">7
135
2^8
119
25
26
4
20
116
1
351
205
3
225
40
88
52
9
183
19
155
179
32
14
50
8^
10
144
25
0
2
0
24
0
1
1
1
2
7
15
6
10
1
0
n
1
n
1
11
6
3
9
0
25
18
3
15
9
6
l\
20
5
0
z
17
1
9
22
0
1
12
22
13
0
1
0
8
0
39
0
19
7
11
3
20
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
323
74
91
491
786
62
123
24
0
334
325
36
117
259
372
36Z
227
345
304
219
273
186
510
231
415
559
41
163
41
160
235
109
851
514
84
494
350
132
1,197
35
290
78
264
765
156
87
316
263
•486
355
16
5
2
3
33
23
4
353
119
138
602
1,129
300
132
35
0
377
446
42
207
346
514
749
407
419
440
175
365
183
588
317
530
744
125
351
63
162
149
138
679
568
196
689
578
274
1,328
32
263
230
298
ItOZl
241
83
394
42"
548
472
92
5
3
3
33
22
4
U.S. TOTALS
55,757
10,074
7,190
4,389
384
14,599
19,121
-------
STATE
CALIFORNIA
DELAWARE
ILLINOIS
KANSAS
MARYLAND
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSOURI
NEVADA
NEW YORK
PENNSYLVANIA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TEXAS
VERMONT
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
PUERTO RICO
TOTAL
1
3
4
1
24
29
121
2
5
809
64
156
1
3
2
2
37
3
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF STATE COST ESTIMATES DIFFERING FROM EPA ASSESSMENTS
CAT I CAT II CAT ITIA CAT II1B CAT !VA CAT IVB
0
0
0
0
2
5
121
1
2
107
41
52
o
0
c
i
4
1
0
0
3
0
20
6
0
0
1
122
9
0
0
1
0
0
1
7
0
1
0
298
6
52
n
0
1
0
7
1
0
3
1
^
1
7
0
0
3
273
8
52
1
0
n
0
11
1
FEBRUARY 10,
TABLE 43
CAT V
1979
U.S. TOTALS
1267
-------
STATE
1978 I\EEOS SURVEY
PERCENT OF STATE DOLLAR NEEDS
BY BASIS CF COST ESTIMATE
EVALUATION ENGINEER / COST OF ENGINEER /
STATE ANALYSIS SURVEY CONSULTANT CCMPARABLE CONSULTANT
CERTIFICATION COMPLETED COMPLETED FIRM EST. CCNSTRUCTION PRELIM. EST.
EPA COST
COST EFFECTIVE
GUIDANCE ANALYSIS
FEBRUARY 10, 1979
TABLE 44
ROUGH
ESTIMATE
NONE
TOTAL
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
CKLAHCMA
CRE6CN
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOOTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMCNT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
MARIANAS
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
".0
0.0
0.1
0.0
o.o
0.0
n ,n
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.D
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
1.1
0.0
4.8
0.0
0. 1
2.7
0.5
0.1
2.6
ft. 1
0.0
0.9
3.5
o.n
0.0
2.1
1.1
3.5
3.7
4.1
1.5
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.6
1.3
10.2
0.8
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.4
1.4
0.0
0.7
3.6
0.0
0.2
4.2
0.6
0.2
0.2
5.9
0.5
6.8
5.2
0.0
0. 7
0.2
0.3
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.3
0.4
C.I
0.1
0.0
0.2
0,0
0.1
P. 6
0.0
1.2
0.5
n.O
0.1
1.9
1.3
n.9
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.4
0.0
C.I
0.0
0.1
C.9
0.1
0.0
0.0
".1
0.0
r.9
0.1
4.7
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
4.2
C.O
0.0
C.O
0.0
0.4
1.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.0
".5
0.0
rj.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
" .1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
O.fl
3.0
o.o
0.0
2.0
3.3
2.5
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.5
2.4
0.8
0.0
3.8
1 .6
1.5
"1.3
0.0
0.4
0.0
1.7
0.6
4.6
0.8
".1
1.5
1.5
1.4
0.4
1.0
0.0
0.5
2.1
3.9
1.3
0.0
1.6
2.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
18.6
7.7
25.7
25.3
29.2
8.2
0.0
5.8
11 .7
3.4
6 .8
2.1
2.9
16.7
5 .8
13.4
0.4
15 .3
8 .8
10.4
0.7
1.0
4.3
0 .5
0.0
3.8
22.1
26.7
6.5
4.1
19.7
6 .0
7.3
6.8
5.4
20.6
2.1
37.8
4.5
0.1
3 .0
53 .5
0.0
21.2
1 .3
5.7
0.9
1 .5
5.3
36.8
1 .3
•> .0
1.9
3.9
68.3
25.6
30.2
42.0
12.6
24.2
44. 1
30.1
54.0
100.0
37.1
36. 1
53.3
36.6
78.3
48.9
58.0
66.7
45.3
22.4
58.7
53.3
77.0
74.3
69.6
51.5
78.9
59.6
67.3
44.6
54.8
52.7
55.4
44.7
59.0
44.3
51.7
29.4
36.8
26.3
26.4
49.8
81.5
51.7
18.5
49.4
37.5
36.6
64.9
21. -4
63.5
20.0
53.5
16.9
0.0
78.9
16.5
31.4
67.1
65.8
38.8
71.0
41.8
30.5
37.9
37. 1
0.0
55.9
45.2
43.2
56.4
13.6
42.3
18.2
23.5
37.2
52.8
24.9
37.7
11,6
22.1
27.2
33.1
14.3
38.5
27.4
25.1
18.0
38.1
40.4
26.5
30.7
43.8
40.4
47.8
36.2
71.8
34.2
39.3
17.0
38. 1
18.5
48.4
36.5
60.6
28.7
76.1
24.8
74.7
9.7
81.7
31.9
18.1
31.6
0.0
0.1
3.8
0.5
5.2
7.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.0
21.4
0.1
0.0
T.n
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
7.5
0.0
d.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
68.1
0.0
48.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
^ f'\
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1"0.0
100.0
no.o
100.0
100. 0
100.0
ino.o
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.1
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
iod.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
101.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
-------
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
STATE CERTIFICATION
ANALYSIS COMPLETED
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT FIRM ESTIMATE
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
EPA - SUPPLIED CCST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
ROUGH ESTIMATE
(NONE GIVEN)
U.S. TOTALS
1978 NEEDS SURVEY
PERCENT OF NATIONAL DOLLAR NEEDS
BY BASIS CF COST ESTIMATE
FEBRUARY in, 1979
TABLE 45
CAT II
CAT IIIA
CAT IIIB
CAT IVA
CAT IVB
TOTAL
".0
0.0
0.0
0.6
14.1
58.2
25.2
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
Q.O
0.0
1 .0
9.9
49.3
36.9
2.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
45.5
9.2
0.8
0.0
24.4
19.9
O.I
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.6
15.8
0.1
0.0
83.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
11.1
19.6
68.4
0,4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
19.4
52.2
24.3
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
1.2
0.9
12.3
46.0
36.5
1.7
0.0
0.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
OGPO 679-141/366
------- |