-------
On-Stream Hours as of November 7 666
Average Stoichiometric Ratio, moles 1.10
Ca/:rnoles SO2 absorbed
Average Percent Lime Utilization 91
Average Percent SC>2 Removal 80
Inlet SO2 Concentration, ppm 1600-4000
Scrubber Outlet pH Range 4. 5-5.5
Solids Dewatering Clarifier
Average Dissolved Solids, ppm 7000
Predicted Sulfate Saturation 150
It is of interest to note, from the data in Figure 5-1, the effect of SOo
inlet concentration on SO2 removal; a drop of SO2 inlet concentration
is invariably accompanied by an increase in SO2 removal, and vice
versa.
Subsequent to the November 7 inspection, system control remained ex-
cellent, despite the varying SO2 inlet load; stoichiometric ratio was
controlled between 1. 02 and 1.16 and scrubber inlet pH between 7. 8 and
8.4.
In order to evaluate the effect of higher percent solids discharged
(higher dissolved solids concentration) upon system reliability, Run
601 -1A was restarted on November 7 with the vacuum rotary drum
filter in series with the clarifier. However, problems with the filter
(filter cloth) resulted in intermittent operation of thid device and on
November 23 the centrifuge was put in service. The centrifuge, how-
ever, also had mechanical difficulties (high vibration) and was taken
out of service after a short while. On December 15, the filter was put
back in service and remained in operation, with periodic replacement
of the filter cloth, until the termination of the test. A summary of the
operating data for Run 601-1A, with both the clarifier and filter in ser-
vice for dewatering, is as follows:
5-6
-------
On-Stream Hours with Clarifier 1487
and Filter
Average Stoichiometric Ratio, 1.11
moles Ca/moles SO2 absorbed
Average Percent Lime Utilization 90
Average SO2 removal 85
Inlet SO 2 Concentration, ppm 1700-4000
Scrubber Outlet pH Range 4. 6-5.4
Solids Dewatering Clarifier/Filter
Average Dissolved Solids, ppm 11,000
Predicted Sulfate Saturation 190
Throughout Run 601-1A, the pressure drop across the chevron demis-
ter had been somewhat variable (0. 63 1" 0. 1 inches f^O) and, after
about December 1, 1973, there was a continual increase. On January
8, 1974, Run 601-1A was terminated after 2153 hours (3 months) of
on-stream operation due to high I. D. fan vibration. The pressure
drop across the demister had increased from about 0.6 to about 1.65
inches H~O. An inspection was conducted on January 9 and the accum-
ulation of scale and solids within the scrubber system is shown in
Figures 5-2 and 5-3.
The mist eliminator was substantially blocked, partly by solids that
had fallen down from the outlet duct work and partly by scale formation,
mainly on the bottom (inlet) vanes. The bottom demister vanes were
covered with 30 to 40 mil scale. The outlet ducting between the re-
heater and I. D. fan damper was covered with from 1 to 3 inches of solids.
The shell of the spray tower was covered with a 3/8 inch thick sulfate
scale below the bottom spray header and a 1/8 inch thick sulfate scale
between the top and bottom spray headers. The rubber lining was vis-
ible in an approximate 2-1/2 ft wide band immediately below the
demister. Noticeable scale and solids buildup occurred on the tips of
5-7
-------
ui
i
00
LEGEND:
/ffff/ff SCALE
SOLIDS
CLEAfii
E -•
DATE OF INSPECTION: ^A*/-
INSPEaOR: -^ ^
SEaiON'A1 SHOWING t>£D /Ooo
SLIDING GUIDE BOLTS /W ytf//> -
w/M 3/6
DETAIL OF SPLASH SEAL
VENTURI
August 1973
Figure 5-2. Venturi Inspection
-------
01
i
vO
m SOLIDS
X PLUGGED NOZZLE
/ PARTIALLY PLUGGED NOZZLE
W-*
ff^ff se*t.f £-
- M
SECTION 'A'
DATE OF INSPECTION:
INSPEQOR: *• c-
ttF 10 MO*^LCS
VAftti ±-±
SECTION 'B'
HEADERS 1 (BOTTOM) 43
SEaiON
HEADERS 2 &4(TOP)
FUNNEL SAMPLER FfLL
IMTO H'/OI TAfifK.
SECTION 'C1
I.D. FAN DAMPERS
FAN
DAMPER
> d~~^ C**-'0S
' ^/'~2mf~^ #ee£.
} \ 3 " TK. *f£#«
TO
r"i
^c
r -.
REHEATER
VENTURI AFTER SCRUBBER
August 1973
Figure 5-3. Spray Tower Inspection
-------
several of the spray nozzles, especially on the bottom header. Some
of the Bete stainless steel ST-48 FCN spiral tip nozzles were found to
be significantly eroded after approximately 4300 hours of slurry ser-
vice; of a total of 28 nozzles, 9 were severely eroded and 15 were con-
siderably worn.
Light 1/16 inch thick scale covered the venturi plug and a 1/8 to 1/4
inch thick scale covered the venturi walls below the plug. A 1/8 to
3/8 inch thick scale covered the walls of the flooded elbow.
About 3/16 inch thick sulfate scale was found in the rubber lined circu-
lating slurry piping. Scale buildup, varying from 1/64 to 1/8 inch in
thickness, was also noted in the rubber lined variable speed pumps.
It should be noted that scale formation in the venturi, spray tower, cir-
culating slurry piping and pumps did not prevent continual operation of
the system or necessitate termination of the 3-month long lime relia-
bility test. However, scale particles in nozzles and strainers required
periodic maintenance.
It seems likely that the scale formation occurred, primarily, during
the latter portion of the test, when the clarifier and filter were used
for solids dewatering and the calculated liquor sulfate saturation was
about 190 percent. As mentioned previously, an earlier inspection of
the system on November 7, 1973, revealed a relatively scale-free
scrubber system. Prior to this inspection the calculated liquor sulfate
saturation was 150 percent.
5-10
-------
The next long-term lime reliability test will be made under conditions
intended to reduce recirculating liquor sulfate super saturation and the
accumulation of solids in the outlet duct-work. Sulfate supersatura-
tion can be reduced (1) by decreasing oxidation of sulfite to sulfate,
(2) by increasing percent solids recirculated, and (3) by increasing
effluent residence time. Oxidation can be reduced by increasing the
scrubber inlet liquor pH and/or by sealing the effluent hold tank. Also,
the eroded stainless Bete spiral tip spray nozzles in the spray tower
will be replaced by Stellite-tipped Bete spray nozzles for the next test.
5-11
-------
Section 6
TEST RESULTS FROM THE EPA PILOT FACILITY
AT RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
It is recognized that operating reliability is crucial to the successful
application of limestone and lime scrubbers to utility boilers. This
fact was the central consideration in planning an experimental program
for the EPA pilot facility at Research Triangle Park. The approach to
the reliability question assumes that scaling by calcium sulfate and
sulfite is one of the most important problems. Therefore, the primary
objective is to identify the operating conditions that eliminate scale
formation. The secondary objective is to maximize the limestone and
lime utilization, which will strongly influence operating cost when
reliability is established. This section summarizes progress toward
the improvement of process performance in these two areas.
6.1 DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT AND OPERATION
Two 300-cfm scrubbers are operated concurrently with flue gas ob-
tained from a natural gas/oil-fired boiler. Sulfur dioxide is fed from
cylinders to provide a constant inlet concentration of 3000 ppm. One
TCA scrubber is operated with lime, while the other with limestone ob-
tained from the Shawnee test facility. Limestone tests are conducted
Ln both TCA and multigrid scrubber configurations. Except for selected
tests, fly ash is not present in the slurry and the liquor is free of chlor-
ide. Both scrubbers operate with closed liquor loop using a rotary drum
filter for solids disposal (about 63 percent solids in sludge discharge).
6-1
-------
6. 2 MATERIAL BALANCES AS A BASIS FOR EVALUATING
PERFORMANCE
It is essential that the primary reactions that occur in the two process
components, the scrubber and effluent hold tank, be determined from
among the various possibilities that have been proposed. For this
purpose, extensive material balances were made on limestone
scrubbers over a range of operating conditions. Typical analytical
data acquired for these material balances are indicated in Figure 6-1.
In order to set up the simultaneous equations that will define all
reactions in both parts of the system, it is necessary to measure the
rate of CO£ evolution from the effluent hold tank, This was accom-
plished by sealing the tank and purging with air at a constant measured
rate. Orsat analyses of the purged gases provide direct data on CO2
evolution and O2 absorption rates at the liquid surface in the tank.
Table 6-1 illustrates the type of information obtained from such
material balances. Among other things, the material balances show
that: (1) under normal operating conditions (stoichiometry of 1.25
based on SO2 feed) about 70 percent of the total limestone dissolution
occurs in the scrubber; and, (2) most of the oxidation occurs in the
hold tank, about 60 percent of the total with a TCA, and 80 percent of
the total with a multigrid scrubber.
The reaction scheme consistent with the data from these material
balances shows two principal reactions occurring in the scrubber:
SO2 + H2O *- H+ + HS03" (6-1)
H+ + CaCO3 ^ Ca++ + HCO3" (6-2)
6-2
-------
GAS OUT
SULFITE OXIDATION =21%
LIMESTONE UTILIZATION = 70%
STOICH. RATIO BASED ON SO2 ABSORBED = 1.45
STOICH. RATIO BASED ON SO2 FEED = 1.13
-*— h
300 cfm 1^
@125°F
-U
78%
SO2 REMOVAL
S02
7.25 Ib/hr
I
GAS IN 1
— '"**¥
^
A
11.6
ft/sac
3200 ppm 1
280° F I j
19.5gpm(L/G = 65)
°2
CO2
LIQUID PHASE SOLID PHASE
SO3 2820 mg/l 94 mg/g
SO2 774 281
CO2 247 124
Ca 600 314
Mg 770
= 12.4%
= 15.8%
13.5 Ib/hr LIMESTONE
CaCO3 =94.9%
MgCO3 = 4.9%
INERTS=1.7%
f
I AIR
\ pH = 5.4 / 0-56 cfm
LIQUID PHASE
SO3 3090 mg/l
SO2 1370
CO2 151
Ca 774
E. H. T. /
5 min. /
4% SOLIDS
C^/ pH = 5.8
^sO " ""*•
Figure 6-1. Operating Data for Limestone Feed
6-3
-------
Table 6-1
TYPICAL PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
OF TCA AND MULTIGRID SCRUBBERS AS DETERMINED
BY MATERIAL BALANCE
Absorbent:
Inlet SO2 Concentration:
Effluent Residence Time:
Stoichiometric Ratio, moles CaCO3/
mole SO2 feed
E. H. T. O2 Absorption Rate,
acfm @ 93°F
E. H. T. CO2 Evolution Rate,
acfm @ 93°F
SO2 Make Per Pass, mg/1
CaCO3 Dissolution in E. H. T. , mg/1
CaCO3 Dissolution in Sc rubber, mg/1
Dissolution in Scrubber, % of total
Total Oxidation, mole %
SO2 Oxidized in Scrubber, mg/1
Oxidation in E. H. T. , % of total
SO2 Ppted in Scrubber as CaSO^, mg/1
803 Ppted in Scrubber as CaSO4, mg/1
L/G, gal/mcf
Scrubber Effluent pH
Scrubber Feed pH
Limestone
2800 ppm
mn.
TCA
4% Solids
1. 13
0. 035
0. 084
Multigrid
16% Solids
1.25
0. 035
0. 062
2.5
0. 014
0. 046
630
357
626
64
21
57
57
-23
380
65
5.4
5.8
774
316
814
72
27
44
78
218
184
48
5. 8
6.3
863
259
1090
81
23
139
30
454
294
48
6.2
6.4
6-4
-------
SC>2 absorption by Equation 6-1 is enhanced as a result of the dissolution
of limestone by Equation 6-2. Dissolution of CaSO3 does not occur as
long as sufficient limestone is present to maintain the scrubber effluent
pH above 5.4 (see Table 6-1). Dissolution of limestone by Equation 6-2
is completed in the scrubber effluent hold tank where it raises the pH.
As a consequence of the increased pH the bisulfite equilibrium is
shifted and sulfite is precipitated. In addition to Equation 6-2, the
primary reactions in the effluent hold tank are:
HS03- ^=r H+ + S03= (6-3)
S03= + Ca++ - — CaS03 (6-4)
The net unreacted species from the above sequence of reactions
(Equations 6-1 through 6-4) are H"1" and HCO3" which build up in the
liquor returned to the scrubber at high pH (~6. 3). The third major
reaction in the scrubber thus occurs when the pH is again dropped by
Equation 6-1; the lower pH shifts the bicarbonate equilibrium irrever
sibly to CC>2f completing the reaction cycle:
H*- + HC03- - — C02 H- H20 (6-5)
The material balances show that about 90 percent of the CC>2 is
released in the scrubber by Equation 6-5. The remainder is evolved
from the effluent hold tank.
6-5
-------
6.3 IMPROVEMENT OF LIMESTONE UTILIZATION
The slowest reaction in the reaction cycle (Equations 6-1 through 6-5)
is the dissolution of limestone (Equation 6-Z). Two important con-
sequences result: (1) the rate of limestone dissolution controls the
reactions that follow it in sequence; and, (2) the extent to which the
dissolution and precipitation reactions go to completion in the effluent
hold tank is determined by the kinetics of limestone dissolution in the
effluent hold tank.
The rate of CaSO3 precipitation is controlled by and directly related
bo the CaCO3 dissolution rate. The kinetics of the overall rate-
Limiting reaction (Equation 6-2) can thus be examined by measurements
:>f the rate of disappearance of SO2 in the effluent hold tank. This was
ione in the pilot plant by operating at various effluent hold tank residence
times, percent solids and limestone stoichiometries. Figures 6-2 and
6-3 summarize these data, showing CaSOg precipitation rate, r(mg
5O2/liter/min. ), as a function of SO2 concentration in the liquid phase,
CSQ? (mS SO2/liter), and limestone density in suspension within the
Dackmixed tank, [CaCOj] in g CaCOj/liter. The analysis indicates
tiiat the overall reaction can be approximated by a rate expression
ihat is second order in sulfite concentration and first order in CaCO3
suspension density.
The high sensitivity of the dissolution/precipitation reaction to SO2
concentration suggests that greater total conversion would be expected
in a reactor without backmixing. This can be shown mathematically
yy integration of the standard reactor design equation with the indicated
6-6
-------
30
10 --
fc
•
o
8 J-
LIMESTONE PARTICLE SIZE:
O 7% GREATER THAN 325 MESH
A 16% GREATER THAN 325 MESH
O
O
1.0 --
0.3
O
O
H 1 I I II
50
100
1,000
3,000
•SO
Figure 6-2. Rate of Sulfite Precipitation in Backmixed
Effluent Hold Tank as a Function of SO2
Concentration in the Liquid Phase
6-7
-------
4x10
-3
l
-------
second order rate expression for backmixed and plug-flow modes of
operation. An experimental comparison of these two reactor types
was carried out using vertical pipes arranged in a series of U-tubes
as a plug-flow hold tank. As shown in Table 6-2 the normal 65-75
percent limestone utilization characteristic of backmixed effluent hold
tanks was increased to 85-90 percent by plug -flow. Scrubber feed pH
was likewise consistently higher in plug-flow tests.
6.4 FATE OF MgCO3 IN LIMESTONE FEED
The limestone used in the pilot scrubber is the same as that used at
the Shawnee test facility, and contains about 5 percent MgCOg. Lime-
stone utilizations are calculated on the basis of the total CaCO3
content of the limestone. Since the MgCO3 component is present as
dolomite (CaCO3« MgCOg), a like number of moles of CaCO3 is bound
in this mineral form. Operating experience, based on Mg*+ levels
(ca. 700 ppm) observed in the closed-loop scrubbing liquor and petro-
graphic analysis of the unreacted spent solid, indicates that a maximum
of about 10 percent of the dolomite component of the limestone feed
dissolves. The remaining solid dolomite passes through the scrubber
without participating in any scrubber reactions. Thus, the utilization
achievable with a dolomitic stone is less than that which can be expected
with a pure limestone. Likewise, the spent sludge from the scrubber
contains no leachable
6. 5 CONTROL OF SULFITE SCALING
Insofar as limestone dissolution kinetics controls the steady state
liquor composition within the scrubber system, the rate of sulfite
6-9
-------
Table 6-2
COMPARISON OF BACKMIXED AND
PLUG-FLOW EFFLUENT HOLD TANK DESIGNS
Scrubber Type: Multigrid
Limestone: Shawnee (Fredonia), 16% f325 mesh
Backmixed Plug- Flow
SO2 Feed Rate, Ib/hr 4.84 4.93
Limestone Feed Rate, Ib/hr (40% Slurry) 17.4 17.6
E. H. T. Residence Time, min. 6 6
Slurry Circulation Rate, gpm 12.7 12.7
Slurry Solids, % 77
Scrubber Feed pH 5.9 6.3
Scrubber Effluent pH 5.6 6.0
Scrubber Effluent Temperature, °F 127 134
Scrubber Feed Temperature, °F 126 124
SO2 Feed Concentration, ppm 2930 3300
Stoichiometry (based on SO2 feed) 0. 87 0. 87
Stoichiometry (based on SO2 absorbed) 1. 33 1.14
Percent SO2 Removal 65.5 76.1
Limestone Utilization, % 75 88
Sulfite Oxidation, mole % 17 10
Ca++ in Scrubber Feed, mg/1 .440 100
6-10
-------
precipitation (Equation 6-4) exceeds that of limestone dissolution
(Equation 6-2) and super saturation by sulfite cannot occur. As indi-
cated by the kinetic analysis, the limestone dissolution rate is
accelerated by increasing the SO2 concentration or suspended limestone
density, or by reducing the limestone particle size. Should the lime-
stone dissolution rate locally exceed the precipitation rate of CaSC>3,
super saturation and scaling of CaSO3 can occur. Tests with the pilot
scrubber at high limestone feed stoichiometries (which increase
suspended limestone density) at L/G of 65 and 3000 ppm SO, in the
inlet flue gas (which determine the effective SC>2 concentration in the
scrubber liquor) showed excessive scaling of the scrubber walls by
CaSOj when the scrubber effluent pH rose above 6.2. This condition
corresponded to a stoichiometric ratio of 2. 5 moles CaCO3/mole SO2
feed, with 93 weight percent of the limestone particles less than 325
mesh. As shown by Table 6-1, the proportion of CaCC>3 dissolution
occurring in the scrubber is increased under these conditions. In
some cases material balances showed as much as 90 percent of the
total limestone dissolution occurring in the scrubber at high feed
stoichiometry. In such situations nearly all of the reaction sequence
is completed within the scrubber rather than delaying precipitation
until the slurry reaches the effluent hold tank as is normally the case.
Reduction of the effluent hold tank residence time will, according to
the reaction scheme discussed, buildup the steady-state sulfite
concentration in the liquor, accelerating the rate of dissolution to the
point where it may no longer control the sulfite precipitation reaction.
The scrubber feed can then become supersaturated. Experience in-
dicates that this condition is not reached until the SC>2 concentration
6-11
-------
Ln the effluent hold tank liquor exceeds 800 mg/1 which occurs only
it very short residence times (less than 5 minutes). On this basis,
residence times shorter than 7 minutes are not recommended with
Limestone scrubbing, particularly when oxidation is inhibited.
D.6 CONTROL OF SULFATE SCALING
A.S shown by the material balances, the dissolution of limestone in the
scrubber increases the concentration of Ca by about 150 ppm at
L/G of 65. When the scrubber feed is saturated with CaSO4* 2H2O
ihis represents a 25 percent increase in the calcium concentration
it the bottom of the scrubber. Thus, even if no oxidation occurs, the
scrubber effluent will be supersaturated with calcium sulfate. In a
TCA scrubber, maximum super saturation occurs at the first stage
support grid and rapid scaling at this point has been experienced in
;he scrubbers with either limestone or lime feeds. In the absence
Df fly ash, the grid openings are plugged within 50 hours at L/G of
52. The presence of fly ash significantly reduces the rate of scaling,
is does increasing L/G. Other factors, such as humidification of
Flue gas (128°F quench) and CaSO4 seeding, had no appreciable effect
when scrubbing flue gases containing 3000 ppm SO?. It was concluded
;hat L/G's must exceed 65 for TCA operation with saturated feed, and
;he presence of fly ash in the slurry is a positive benefit from the
scale-control point of view.
A. limestone or lime scrubber is customarily visualized as operating
with two coexisting, but independent, liquid/solid systems involving
precipitated CaSO3' 1 /2 H2O, crystallized CaSO4* 2H2O, and saturated
6-12
-------
mother liquor. Any sulfate generated by oxidation in the scrubber
must, according to this view, build up in the recirculating solution
until it is saturated with calcium sulfate. Crystallization of gypsum
thereupon removes the sulfate from the system.
It was shown by Imperial Chemical Industries (I.C.I. ) in 1951 that
significant amounts of calcium sulfate are incorporated into the calcium
sulfite crystal lattice when it precipitates from scrubber liquors. The
amount of sulfate that could be so incorporated was experimentally
established at 0. 225 mole SOj/mole SO? for precipitation in a limestone
slurry. The resulting compound was referred to as a "solid solution. "
Although unsaturated operation of the I. C. I. Bankside scrubber was
never reported, the formation of the solid solution clearly affords an
alternate mechanism by which CaSO^ can be purged from the system
without crystallization. Thus, if the rate of generation of sulfate by
oxidation is less than the rate at which sulfate is incorporated by the
precipitating CaSO,, the recirculating liquor is no longer constrained
to saturation by calcium sulfate.
That a closed-loop scrubber can operate unsaturated by the above
mechanism was first noted during the plug-flow hold tank experiments
at the EPA pilot facility. Unsaturation was evidenced by steady state
Ca"1"1" concentrations of only 100 ppm in the scrubbing liquor (about
1/6 the level of saturation with CaSO^.* 2H2O). Material balances
confirmed closed-loop operation and direct dissolution of solid
CaSO4'2H7O in the scrubber liquor proved unsaturation. Tests of the
solid solution verified the characteristics reported by I. C.I. , i. e. , no
detectable gypsum by x-ray diffraction, and no gypsum extractable by
water. Therefore, the sulfate shown to be present by chemical analysis
6-13
-------
(9-17 percent of total sulfur) does not exist as a separate phase.
Confirmation of the presence of sulfate by chemical analysis was made
by dissolution of the solid solution in HC1, extraction and recrystalli-
zation of pure gypsum from -water in the amounts indicated by analysis.
Intense x-ray peaks at d-values of 2.67 and 5, 34 have also been noted,
which are similar to those of calcium thiosulfate, Since thiosulfate
•was shown to be absent by chemical analysis, these peaks are probably
characteristic of the solid solution.
Tests with the backmixed effluent hold tank showed that it could also
be operated in the unsaturated mode by sealing the top of the tank to
prevent air contact with the slurry. As indicated by the material
balances, most oxidation occurs in the effluent hold tank. Sealing the
tank eliminates this source and the total oxidation is reduced to about
10-15 percent (CC^ evolution from the tank provides a self-generating
blanket). Unsaturation of the liquor occurs when the oxidation falls
below the level corresponding to the maximum 803/SO2 ratio in the
solid solution.
The oxidation level at which unsaturation occurs is shown in Figure 6-4
where calcium concentrations of the scrubber feed liquor are plotted
over the full range of oxidation in which the pilot plant has been oper-
ated. It is clear that calcium concentrations correspond to saturated
CaSO^' 2H2O above 19 percent oxidation and drop progressively as
oxidation is reduced below that level. The relationship between oxida-
tion and the SO3/SC>2 mole ratio in the solid is given by:
Sulfite Oxidation = SO2 Oxidized/(SO2 Oxidized + SO2 Precipitated)
= Ratio/(Ratio + 1)
where (6~6)
Ratio = SO3/SO2 mole ratio in solid
6-14
-------
800
700--
600--
Z
UJ v
U £*
z o
O ^
u O
a I
5 £
—• *
< U
U vi
400--
300--
200 ••
100 ••
O
O
.0.
I.C.I. SOLID SOLUTION
SATURATION
SATURATED LIQUOR
0_Q_
-8-
O TCA SCRUBBER - STIRRED TANK
A MULTIGRID SCRUBBER - STIRRED TANK
D MULTIGRID SCRUBBER - PLUG FLOW
30
40
50
60
70
80
MOLE PERCENT SULFITE OXIDATION
Figure 6-4.
Calcium Sulfate Saturation as a Function of Sulfite Oxidation in Scrubbers
Operating -with Limestone: Chloride Concentration = 0
-------
Therefore, 19 percent oxidation corresponds to the maximum SO3/SC>2
mole ratio of 0. 23, which is in good agreement with the value obtained
by I. C. I. from laboratory measurements.
Elimination of sulfate super saturation of the scrubber effluent liquor
by operation in an unsaturated mode has been demonstrated in the
TCA pilot scrubber with both limestone and lime feeds. In either
case, the limitation of oxidation below 19 percent is the critical con-
dition for desaturation. Other factors that may affect solid solution
formation and the ability to operate unsaturated, particularly in the
presence of high concentrations of chloride, are less well defined.
The current work at the EPA pilot facility is focused in this area.
6. 7 UTILIZATION IN LIME SCRUBBERS
When CaO is the scrubber feed rather than CaCOo» dissolution kinetics
is no longer a constraint and higher utilizations can be achieved in a
stirred tank of given residence time. Comparison of Figure 6-1
(limestone) and Figure 6-5 (lime) illustrates the difference at scrubber
feed pH of about 6 for 5 minutes residence time and 4 percent solids.
For lime scrubbing, raising the scrubber feed pH will increase the
amount of CO2 absorbed from the flue ga,s and utilization drops as
Ca(OH)2 is recarbonated to CaCO^. This side reaction must be limited
if the advantage of CaO over CaCO3 is to be maintained. Table 6-3
summarizes a series of tests made in the pilot scrubber to determine
the effect of feed pH on lime utilization. The values of utilization
shown are based on the solids analysis and do not reflect losses in
the slaking step, -which average about 4 percent of the total CaO content
6-16
-------
GAS OUT
SULFITE OXIDATION = 26%
LIME UTILIZATION =98%
STOICH.RATIO BASED ON SO2 ABSORBED = 1.0
300 cfm
@125° F
GAS IN
u-
R1%
>-
S02 REMOVAL
SO2
6.10lb/hr
I
I
T
V
L
'
I
*
I
t
11.5
ft/sec
L
19.5gpm(L/G°65)
LIQUID PHASE SOLID PHASE
SO3 2980 mg/l 1 25 tng/g
S02 216 378
C02 29 7
Ca 585 305
Mg 546
5.01 Ib/hr LIME
CaO = 96%
MgO = 04%
/
LIQUID PHASE
S03
S02
CO?
Ca
3300 mg/l
1110
42
boo
E. H. T. /
mm. /
4% SOLIDS
/
/
*-v pH=6-1 .
^ki *
Figure 6-5. Operating Data for Lime Feed
6-17
-------
Table 6-3
EFFECT OF FEED pH ON LIME SCRUBBER OPERATION
Scrubber Type: TCA
Pressure Drop: 6. 5 in. H^O
Effluent Residence Time: 5 min.
Percent Solids: 4%
Scrubber Feed pH
i I 1 12.
CO2 in Scrubber Effluent, mg/1 42 43 47 68
CO2 in Scrubber Feed, mg/I 29 26 25 8
CO2 Precipitated in E. H. T. , 13 17 22 60
mg/1
CO2 in Solid, mg/g 7 14 " 33 37
Lime Utilization, % 98 97 89 81
Ca++ in Scrubber Feed, mg/1 585 570 845 896
SO2 Make Per Pass, mg/1 506 569 500 570
ASO2 Across Scrubber, mg/1 732 866 674 600
ASO2 - Make Per Pass, mg/1 226 297 174 30
ACa Across Scrubber, mg/1 298 255 240 136
SO2 in Scrubber Feed, mg/1 216 188 64 33
Percent SO2 Removal 81* 78 80 84
Sulfite Oxidation, mole % 26 20 19 13
Mg++, mg/1 546 1000 40 5
Scrubber Effluent pH 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.0
* AP = 8. 5 in.
6-18
-------
of pebble lime. It is clear from Table 6-3 that recarbonation is
significant at inlet pH of 9 and above. Also, magnesium is precipi-
tated from the liquor at pH of 9. These facts indicate that the optimum
scrubber inlet pH1 s are in the range of 7-8.
The data in Table 6-3 confirm the observation reported by others
that the primary scrubbing reaction in the lime system is the dis-
solution of CaSC>3:
CaS03 + H+ — Ca++ + HS03~ (6-7)
This is evidenced by the fact that the change in SC>2 concentration in
liquid ( ASC>2) across the scrubber exceeds the SC>2 make per pass in
all cases together with the increase in Ca concentration across the
scrubber.
It is notable that the reaction shown by Equation 6-5, which contributes
to pH buffering in limestone scrubbers, does not occur in.a lime system.
Consequently the pH drops to a greater degree when SC>2 is absorbed.
As indicated in Table 6-3, change in liquor pH across the scrubber
(1-5 units) far exceeds the 0. 5 unit typical of limestone scrubbers.
This lack of buffering is presumed to be responsible for the generally
lower SC>2 scrubbing efficiency that has been experienced with lime
scrubbing at the EPA pilot facility, compared to limestone at a given
pressure drop.
At SC>2 feed concentrations in excess of 2500 ppm, the increase in
calcium concentration in the scrubber effluent resulting from CaSO,
dissolution (Equation 6-7) is responsible for CaSC>4 super saturation
6-19
-------
and TCA grid scaling in lime system, in the same manner as
dissolution (Equation 6-2) in limestone systems. The most effective
technique for dealing with this problem appears to be the unsaturated
mode of operation discussed in the previous section. Control of pH,
oxidation and Mg++ concentration to yield an unsaturated scrubber feed
and marginally saturated (to unsaturated) scrubber effluent is an
achievable goal for either limestone or lime scrubber systems.
6.8 CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions have been drawn from the limestone and
lime results of the TCA pilot-plant testing at Research Triangle
Park, -with inlet SO2 feed concentrations of 3000 ppm:
• For limestone scrubbing, control of the scrubber effluent
pH below 6. 2 will prevent calcium sulfite scaling.
• Optimum scrubber inlet pH (reasonable SO^ removal and
reasonable lime utilization) for lime scrubbing is in the
7-8 range.
• Limestone dissolution kinetics are improved by plug flow
reaction; higher utilizations can be achieved by effluent
hold tank designs such as U-tubes or a series of stirred
tanks that approximate plug flow.
• For limestone scrubbing, dissolution of CaCO3 is the rate
controlling step for SO^ absorption. For high-calcium lime
scrubbing, dissolution of CaSOj is the rate controlling step.
• Hold tank residence time must exceed 5 minutes in a lime-
stone system. 10 minutes appears to be a good choice.
For a lime system, 5 minutes appears adequate.
• The scrubber effluent will always be supersaturated with
CaSO4* ZHoO when a scrubber is operated -with saturated
feed.
6-20
-------
• Super saturation is maximum at the first stage TCA support
grid and rapid scaling of the grid by calcium sulfate occurs
at liquid-to-gas ratios less than 65 gal/mcf with no fly ash
in the system. The liquid-to-gas ratio must exceed 65 for
reliable operation with saturated calcium sulfate feed.
• The presence of fly ash reduces the rate of scaling by
calcium sulfate.
• Sulfate scaling can be eliminated by operating a scrubber
in the unsaturated mode. Closed liquor loop unsaturated
operation can be achieved in a chloride-free scrubber by
reducing oxidation below 19 percent. Under these conditions
the sulfate generated by oxidation is purged entirely as solid
solution (i. e. calcium sulfate in calcium sulfite crystal
lattice).
• For limestone scrubbing, oxidation is a controllable variable
within the limits required for unsaturated operation. It can
be reduced by eliminating air contact in the effluent hold
tank (e.g. , using sealed stirred tank or plug flow tank).
Further reduction can be attained by circulating high percent
solids (which affects the amount of liquor circulating through
the clarifier or filter).
• Sulfate bound as solid solution is not extractable from the
spent sludge by water leaching. Therefore, the potential
for water pollution is reduced.
• The dolomitic component of limestone feeds is essentially
inert and leaves the scrubber in the same form within the
sludge.
6-21
-------
Section 7
FINDINGS TO DATE
Based on Shawnee and EPA pilot facility testing to date, the following
items are preliminary findings regarding (1) scrubber design and oper-
ating parameters, (2) process chemistry/advanced concepts, and (3)
equipment/mate rials/instrumentation.
Scrubber Design and Operating Parameters
The TCA and the venturi/spray tower have potential for reliable op-
eration for both limestone and lime scrubbing. Due primarily to noz-
zle wear problems, insufficient data has been generated on the Marble-
Bed scrubber to assess its reliability potential under Shawnee conditions.
Conditions for best overall potential for reliable limestone scrubbing
operation with configurations comparable to the Shawnee scrubber sys-
tems are: an effluent residence time equal to or greater than 10 min-
utes and a percent solids recirculated equal to or greater than 10 per-
cent, for a liquid-to-gas ratio equal to or greater than 60 gal/mcf.
Variables which appear particularly important are liquid-to-gas ratio
and scrubber superficial gas velocity. Shawnee liquid-to-gas ratios
should be considered minimum values, since there is evidence that
values higher than attainable at Shawnee would further minimize the
potential for scrubber scaling and increase SC>2 removal and limestone
7-1
-------
utilization. Superficial velocity is considered important since there
appears to be a certain value above which excessive demister entrain-
ment occurs. For the Shawnee demister/Koch tray configuration in
the TCA, this maximum velocity appears to be about 8 ft/sec. The
spray tower demister/wash system limitation appears to be about 6
ft/sec.
For lime scrubbing, the venturi/spray tower conditions which have
given good results in the operation to date are: (1) a scrubber inlet pH
of 8, (2) an effluent residence time of 12 minutes, (3) a percent solids
recirculated of 8 percent (40 percent of solids is fly ash), and (4) a
spray tower liquid-to-gas ratio of 64 gal/mcf. In addition to the im-
portance of liquid-to-gas ratio and superficial gas velocity discussed
for limestone systems, inlet scrubber pH is considered important in
lime systems; the value of 8. 0 has resulted in good performance.
The following factors should be effective in minimizing pluggage prob-
lems associated with chevron-type demisters: (1) minimize scrubber
superficial velocity consistent with cost, turndown, space and other
factors, (2) utilize a wash tray between the uppermost scrubber stage
and demister, and (3) wash demister from upstream (bottomside) di-
rection with a mixture of clarified liquor and all available makeup water
and assure complete surface irrigation.
All three scrubbers have been effective dust collectors, since they have
reduced inlet particulate loadings from about 2-5 grains/scf to 0. 01-
0. 04 grains /scf.
7-2
-------
Limited cascade impactor distribution data for the TCA indicates
effective particulate removal in the submicron range. For example,
at the highest pressure drop tested (9. 7-9. 9 inches f^O), TCA re-
moval efficiencies were about 95 percent in the 0. 1 to 0. 2 micron di-
ameter size range; decreased pressure drops resulted in significantly
reduced removal efficiencies. Further testing, however, is neces-
sary to validate this apparent high performance in the submicron range.
It should be noted that combined scrubber collection of SC>2 and fly ash
(no mechanical or ESP collection upstream of the scrubbers) seems to
have a major disadvantage. Namely, that roughly 30-50 percent of
slurry solids is fly ash, -which appears to be the most abrasive solid
component. Rubber lined components have shown little evidence of
wear. The following components, however, appear particularly sensi-
tive to erosion: TCA spheres, TCA support grids, slurry spray noz-
zles, centrifuge and venturi throat guide-vane assembly. Work with
vendors is in progress to improve these components.
Although it is too early for a definitive finding concerning the relative
advantages of lime versus limestone, the following are preliminary
observations: (1) lime utilizations are substantially higher than lime-
stone utilizations; in the order of 90-93 percent for lime vs. 65-75 per-
cent for limestone, (2) pH control appears easier with lime since pH
is more sensitive to alkali addition than in the limestone system, where
the required excess is higher, and (3) preliminary at least, lime opera-
tion seems less prone to plugging and scaling problems, although rea-
sons for this apparent difference are not well understood. As mentioned
previously, the moisture content of the discharge slurry is higher than
desired for the lime testing.
7-3
-------
Process Chemistry/Advanced Concepts
Generally operation at Shawnee for both limestone and lime has yielded
scrubbing liquors that were either saturated or supersaturated with re-
spect to CaSO4- 2H2O and CaSO3' 1/2H2O. The following combination
of process variables appear effective in minimizing scaling potential:
(1) high liquid-to-gas ratios, (2) greater than 1 percent CaSO^/2H2O
seed crystals in slurry, and (3) effluent residence times greater than
or equal to 10 minutes. To minimize demister scaling, dilution of de-
mister or wash tray liquor with fresh water appears to be effective.
Research on the small pilot scrubber at EPA-RTP has indicated that
it may be possible to operate in an unsaturated sulfate mode with re-
spect to CaSOj' 2H2O, with potential freedom from gypsum scaling.
Low oxidation is essential to operation in this mode.
Plug flow effluent hold tank designs appear substantially more effec-
tive than conventional stirred tanks in enhancing limestone utilization.
They also help achieve unsaturated operation by reducing hold tank oxi-
dation. Further work is necessary.
It has been determined that the dolomite fraction of dolomitic limestone
is very slowly soluble and does not supply alkalinity under normal scrub-
ber operating conditions.
With properly calcined dolomite, magnesium does go into solution and,
when using dolomitic limes, SC>2 removal efficiencies are substantially
enhanced; this appears to be due to the increased amounts of solution
alkalinity in the form of magnesium sulfite (relative to sulfurous acid).
7-4
-------
In limestone systems it is important to avoid high stoichiometries with
corresponding high pH's, because CaSC>3* l/ZJ^O formed in the scrubber
precipitates and can lead to scaling. Lower limestone stoichiometries
are also effective in enhancing limestone utilizations, since limestone
dissolution is much more rapid at the lower pH's.
It appears practicable to substantially increase oxidation by air sparg-
ing in the stirred hold tank; this could lead to improved sludge charac-
teristics. Further evaluation is necessary.
The scrubbers are effective in absorbing HC1 from the flue gas (coal
has from 0. 1 to 0. 3 percent Cl) leading to relatively high liquor chlor-
ide levels during closed loop operation. Although the effects of chloride
are not well understood, they appear, for example, to significantly de-
crease scrubber pH with subsequent loss in absorption performance.
Equipment/Materials/Instrumentation
Rubber lined, variable speed, centrifugal pumps with Hydroseals
or Centriseals are reliable for slurry service.
For a fuel oil fired reheater, an isolated or external combustion
chamber should be used to avoid quenching of the reheater flame
by cold flue gas.
The rubber linings of the scrubbers, pumps, pipes, etc. , give
satisfactory erosion and corrosion resistances for slurry and flue
gas (quenched) services. Flakeline linings on the effluent hold tanks
and clarifiers are also satisfactory.
7-5
-------
Type 316L stainless steel gives irmch better corrosion resistance
than type 304L in slurries containing chlorides.
A centrifuge gives satisfactory de-watering capability. However,
erosion on the metal surfaces is a major problem.
The dewatering and cake discharge capabilities of the filter, using
a nylon filter cloth, are satisfactory. However, the useful life of
the nylon filter cloth tested to-date is unsatisfactory.
Uniloc Model 321 submersible type pH meters gives better perfor-
mance than Model 320 in-line flow-through types.
The performance of Ohmart radiation-type and bubble-type density
meters is unsatisfactory. The performance of Dynatrol density
meters has thus far been encouraging.
Control valves in slurry service have generally been unsatisfactory.
Variable speed pumps should be used for slurry flow control.
7-6
-------
Section 8
. FUTURE TEST PLANS AT THE SHAWNEE FACILITY
Planni ig has been performed to formulate a follow-up test program
to the present Shawnee activities. It should be noted that these plans
are quite preliminary in nature; they require additional funding which
has not officially been authorized and hopefully will be modified based
on utility and vendor inputs. Figure 8-1 presents the overall test
schedule for advanced limestone and lime testing which will extend
the present program through June 1976. The folio-wing are the ob-
jectives of the advanced program:
Evaluate the effectiveness of automatic control systems
for scrubbers experiencing widely varying flue gas flow
rates and inlet SO? concentrations.
Investigate advanced process variations which offer
promise of enhanced reliability by completely eliminating
potential for gypsum scaling.
For limestone systems, evaluate process variations which
offer potential for substantial increases in limestone utili-
zation, with subsequent decrease in sludge production.
For limestone and lime systems determine the upper limit
of SC>2 removal efficiencies within the constraints of facility
scrubber configuration, pressure drop and liquid flow rate
limitations. This may be important if future air pollution
regulations require more stringent SO2 control for power
plants.
8-1
-------
00
I
tv
TEST PROGRAM FUNCTIONS
PRESENT TEST PROGRAM
LIMESTONE LONG TERM TESTING (TWO 2000 Hi. TESTS)
LIME LONG TERM TESTING (TWO 2000 Mr. TESTS)
LIME FACTORIAL TESTING
LIMESTONE ADVANCED TESTING
FACILITY CAPABILITY SCREENING TESTS (CONTROL. OXIDATION)
FACILITY MODIFICATIONS (OXIDATION, EHT. CONTROL)
VARIABLE LOAD TESTING (pH CONTROL. 2500 Hn.l
LIMESTONE SLUDGE FIXATION
SEALED HOLD TANK (TWO 500 Hi. TESTS!
PLUG FLOW HOLD TANK TESTS (THREE 500 Hr. TESTS)
ADDITIVE TESTS (THREE 500 Mr. TESTS)
MAXIMIZE OXIDATION TESTS (THREE 500 Hi. TESTS)
MAXIMIZE UTILIZATION (THREE 250 Hr. TESTS)
MAXIMIZE SOj REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (THREE 500 Hi. TESTS)
ADV. CONCEPT RELIAB. TEST (1500 Hr CONST.. 1500 Hrv VARIABLE!
LIME/DOLOMITIC LIME ADVANCED TESTING
FACILITY CAPABILITY SCREENING TESTS (CONTROL. OXIDATION)
FACILITY MODIFICATIONS
VARIABLE LOAD TESTING (LIME)
LIME SLUDGE FIXATION
LIME TESTING
Plug Flow HOW T«nk (Two 5OO Hr. Ton)
Seated HM Tank (Two 500 Hi. Tan)
OOLOMITIC LIME TESTING
Salad Hold Tmk (One 500 Hi. Tall
Open Hold Tank (Two 500 Hi. Tntll
Pluj Flow Hokl T.nk (One 500 Ht. Tail
MAXIMIZE SO2 REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (THREE 500 Hi. TESTS)
MAXIMIZE OXIDATION TESTS (THREE 500 Hi. TESTS)
ADVANCE CONCEPT RELIABILITY TESTING (SAME AS LIMESTONE)
GENERAL PUBLICATION REPORTS
1973
N| 0
1974
J F M | A JMJ J J A S\O\ N\D
,,^.«.*, . f.«. ..
4
"_
4
1975
J|F|M|A|M|J J | A | s O|N|D
1976
J|F|M|A|M|J J)A s | o N]O
LEGEND
• •
^^m
•M^M
4 4
• TESTING OR MODIFICATION EFFORTS
• ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS EVALUATION
IM
•
*
Figure 8-1. Preliminary Schedule for Advanced Shawnee Program
-------
Investigate process variations and/or de-watering equipment
•which are capable of producing a more acceptable sludge
product.
Perform long term reliability testing on advanced limestone
and lime process variations which offer substantial improve-
ment over present process variations in one or more of the
following areas: potential reliability, limestone utilization,
SO£ removal efficiency and improved sludge product charac-
teristics.
In order to attempt to achieve these objectives, the following rep-
resents our preliminary thinking regarding the elements of the
advanced program:
Limestone Testing
For limestone, based on the results of the present test program, a
single scrubber train will be selected for advanced testing; in all
probability this will be the Turbulent Contact Absorber. Design of
system modifications will be initiated during early 1974 with the aim
of supplying a plug flow hold tank and other modifications necessary
for future testing. Facility capability screening tests will be the
first tests performed following the present test program. These
will attempt to evaluate the facility's present capability (without
modifications) in terms of (1) supplying the necessary oxidation
capability (via air sparging in the present effluent hold tank) to
produce an improved gypsum-rich sludge product and (2) ability of
the present pH control-system to effectively adjust limestone feed
rates to correspond to wide variations in flue gas and inlet SO?
concentration variations. Approximately two months are planned
for the necessary system modifications.
8-3
-------
Subsequent to this, variable load testing for a period of approximately
2500 hours will be performed on the process variation subjected to
earlier reliability testing. The pH control system selected will
attempt to keep the chemistry of the system in balance despite the
wide variations in SC>2 inlet concentrations associated with normal
Shawnee coal supplies, and a pre-programmed flue gas flow rate
daily history (via duct damper settings) which will simulate a widely
varying boiler output.
At the conclusion of this test, the effluent hold tank will be sealed
and process parameters selected to attempt to operate with the
lowest practicable oxidation; this will hopefully enable operation
in the "unsaturated-gypsum" mode which has potential for elimina-
ting gypsum scaling as a potential operating problem. After comple-
tion of this testing, the plug flow hold tank -will be tested as an
alternative to the present stirred tank; this configuration offers the
following potential advantages: (1) elimination of hold tank oxidation
allowing greater potential for unsaturated operation, (2) improved
limestone utilization and/or SO^ removal efficiencies, and (3)
potentially improved pH control, since the more sensitive scrubber
outlet pH can be used as the limestone feed rate control variable.
In another attempt to increase limestone utilizations and/or SC>2
removal efficiencies, additives will be tested for their ability to
increase limestone dissolution rates with corresponding improve-
ments in performance.
8-4
-------
Subsequent to this, process variations will be selected which offer
the potential for producing sludge with more desirable properties.
For example, oxidation of scrubber slurry will be enhanced (via
air sparging in a hold tank or by a separate oxidizer utilizing
Japanese technology) to produce a predominately gypsum/fly ash
product which should have vastly improved settling characteristics
over calcium sulfite-rich sludges. Advanced de-watering equipment
and liquor bleed stream treatment equipment might also be tested
with the aim of producing a more acceptable landfill material with-
out the need for a fixation treatment process.
Based on the results obtained prior to this point, two separate test
series will be performed; they will attempt to find conditions
associated with achieving maximum limestone utilization (minimum
sludge production) and maximum SO2 removal efficiencies, respec-
tively, consistent with constraints imposed by scrubber type, pressure
drop limitations and reasonable process economics.
The last scheduled limestone run would involve long term reliability
testing on an advanced process variation selected based on results
of prior evaluation and optimization testing. The process variation
will be selected with the aim of maximizing reliability, limestone
utilization and SC>2 removal efficiency, and improving sludge charac-
teristics consistent with reasonable process economics.
Lime Testing
A single scrubber type will be selected for lime testing; based on
8-5
-------
results to date this will probably be the venturi/spray absorber. As
discussed under limestone testing, facility capability screening
tests and system modifications will be performed during mid-1974
•with subsequent performance of variable load testing using hydrated
lime [ Ca(OH)2 ] as the alkali.
Subsequent testing will be divided into hydrated lime and slightly
dolomitic hydrated lime [ Ca(OH)2« — 5% Mg(OH)2 ] test blocks.
This is planned based on the research data generated at the RTP
scrubber facility and communications with commercial vendors
•which indicate that dolomitic lime offers the following potential
advantages over low-magnesium lime: (1) higher SO., removal
efficiency potential due to higher concentration of the sulfite anion
in solution, and (2) higher potential for operation in the unsaturated-
gypsum mode, since higher concentrations of dissolved sulfates
have been shown to favor formation of CaSO^/CaSO^ solid solutions.
Two series of lime tests are planned which-will evaluate sealed
stirred tank and plug flow hold tank variations on unsaturated oper-
ation and,in the case of the plug flow hold tank,on SO? removal
efficiencies and lime utilization.
A similar test series will be performed using dolomitic lime as the
alkali; however, three effluent hold tank variations will be evaluated:
the sealed stirred tank, the plug flow hold tank, and the conven-
tional stirred tank.
8-6
-------
Subsequent to this testing, two test series will be performed with
the objective of maximizing SC>2 removal efficiencies, and improving
sludge characteristics, respectively* These will be similar in scope
to the limestone tests described earlier.
Finally, the last lime test would involve long term reliability testing
on an advanced lime (or dolomitic lime) process variation, selected
as the most promising based on a review of prior testing.
8-7
-------
Section 9
REFERENCES
1. Bechtel Corporation, EPA Alkali Scrubbing Test Facility:
Sodium Carbonate and Limestone Test Results, EPA Report
650/2-73-013, August 1973.
2. M. Epstein, et al. , "Limestone Test Results at the EPA
Alkali Wet-Scrubbing Test Facility at the TVA Shawnee Power
Plant, " presented at the Sixty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the
A.I.Ch.E., Philadelphia, Pa., November 11-1 5, 1973.
3. M. Epstein, et al. , "Test Results from the EPA Lime/Limestone
Scrubbing Test Facility, " presented at the Flue Gas Desulfuri-
zation Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 14-17, 1973.
4. Radian Corporation, A Theoretical Description of the Limestone-
Injection Wet Scrubbing Process, NAPCA (APTIC No. 22709 and
25446) Report, June 9, 1970.
5. A. Saleem, J. Air Pollution Control Assoc. , Vol. 22, No. 3,
March 1972.
9-1
-------
Appendix A
CONVERTING UNITS OF MEASURE
Environmental Protection Agency policy is to express all measurements
in metric units. When implementing this practice will result in undue
costs or lack of clarity, conversion factors are provided for the non-
metric units. Generally, this report uses British units of measure.
For conversion to the metric system, use the following conversions:
To Convert From
acfm
OF
ft
ft/sec
gal/mcf
gpm/ft
gr / scf
n
in. H2O
Ib-moles
Ib-moles/hr
Ib-moles/min
To
nm^/hr
°C
m
m/sec
min/m^
o
gm/m
cm
mm Hg
gm-moles
gm-moles /min
gm-moles /sec
Multiply By
1.70
subtract 32 then
'* 1.8
0.305 •
0. 305
0. 134
3.79
40.8
2.29
2.54
1.87
454
7. 56
7.56
A-l
-------
Appendix B
GRAPHICAL OPERATING DATA FROM LIMESTONE
RELIABILITY VERIFICATION TESTS
B-l
-------
BOILtR WMNTENANCl I
VENIURI & SFTtAV tOWER INLET (LAB)
• VENTUII & SKAY TOWEI OUTLET (LAB)
Gil Rut. • 30.000 icfrn 8 330 °F
Liquor RUB to Vanturi = 600 gpm
Liquor Rltt to Spny Tower = 1.200 gpm
Vinturi L/G = 27 pl/mcf
Sony Tower L/G= 53 jal/mcf
Sony Tower GUI Velocity • 7.5 ft/at
Vemuri Prasure Drop = 9 in r^O
E.H.T. Rnidenci Time - 12 min
No. of Spray Haderi = 4
Gn Inlet SQ2 Cone. • 2,500-3.200 ppm
12,000-2.200 ppm during 7/26 end 7/28)
Scrubber Inlet Liquor Temp. = 126-131 °F
Liquid Conductivity = 9.500 21.500 ji mhoi/en
Discharge ICIerHier& Centrifuge) Solids
Cone. * 57-65 wt %
eppnuimetely 1-1/4 moleXMg C03naibeen
mad it the tea facility. Prior to ttiil tinw a limntone
havingepproximately 5 mole % Mg C03 habainusad.
7/28 1 7/79 I
TESTTIMf, heun
VJO I
CALENMI OAV
£ a O
IS'.
11 =
, IN SOLUBLES (ASH)
/27 I 7/2B I 7/39 I '/30 I 7/3) I 8/1
14,000
12,000
10.000
_ 8,000
5 6,000
? -,000
2 2,000
• TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS • rAAGNiSIUM (Mtj ** 1
^> CALCIUM [Co ** ) A SODIUM (f^i * 1
O 5UIFA1E (SO^" ) "7 POTASSIUM
-------
Gil Ran - 30.000 artm » 330 °F
Liquor Ran to Vinturi • 600 gpm
Liquor Rail to Spray Towir • 1,200 gpm
Vmlitri L/C - 27 nil/mri
SPTBY Tower L/G » 53 gal/md
Spray Tower Gai Vilociry - 7.5 rt/ac
Vinluri Prinuro Drop • 9 in r^O
E.H.T. HeudenceTime-Umin
No. ol Spriy Hearlan - 4
Gil Inlet S02 Cone. - 2.600-3.300 ppm
Soubbir Inlet Liquor Temp, • 128-132 °F
Llnuid ConductivilY- 22,000-27,000 u mhoi/cm
Dbclwrta ICIiritinl Cinlrifugi) Solidi
Cone.-55-65 wl%
CALENDAI DAY
SI:
. INSOIUUES (ASH)
f*'-
ls\ '
S ? 8
2= "
Si'
B|' "
8§I ..
IEII riMi. h«,
I l/v I
CALENDAI DAY
I a/ii l
14,000
M,000
11.000
10,000
B.OOO
6,000
7,000
0
.
; o
0
A
*
a
V
•
: * °
A
Q 0
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOllDS
CALCIUM (C. ** )
SULFATE (SO4 ' )
CHLORIDE (Cl ' )
MACNCSUM [Mg **)
SODIUM [Mo * )
POTASSIUM (K '1
SUlFIll (SO. " )
CARIONATKCO, '»
-
-
'
t*,ooo
11,000
10,000
1,000
6,000
1,000
0
i .
IESI TIME, teun
Ifl I 1/10
CALENDAX DAY
Figure B-] (Continued)
OPERATING DATA FOR VENTURI
RUN 506-1A
B-3
-------
KG IN «UtNl.Q-ZA
TEST TIME .ton
7/1 I f/J I
CAUNOAI DAY
14,000
11,000
10,000
3
_ 1,00X3
l" ..«>
li
E «.ooo
i
§ 2,000
C o
O CAlCIUM [Co ** > ^ MAGNESIUM (Mfl " ) '
D SULFAIE (SO/ ) ^ SODIUM (No M •
^ PorASstuM IK *)
• • SU1FITE BOj' ) • «
O CAtlONAIE ICOj' )
• -
"
-
A * A A
o o o o -
a • D n • •
14,000
12,000
10,000
i.ooa
4,000
4,000
2,000
0
Gn Riu • 25.000 icfm « JOO °F
Liquor Rne-UOOgpm
L/G-Mpl/mcf
Cm Velocity 9.8 WBC
E.H.T. Roidsna Tims = 20 min
Three Stagti, S in tfttmt/tUf
Go Inln S02 Cone. = 2.000-2.700 ppm
Scrubber Into liquor T«mp. • 121-1!7°F
Liquid Condunnrity - 11.000-20,000 Ji mhoi/cm
Dinhirjt [Chrifiirt Solid. Cone. = 26-M M %
•a
S7
&
_i Q_
6/1? I */»
CALENDAR DAY
7/7
Figure B-2
OPERATING DATA FOR TCA
RUN 510-2A
B-4
-------
ENOIUN JIO-2A '
2 a
P ,
w
o~Q f u
BO
75
10
•
SS3- •
E s ^
7
...
Sii»
5 s
1.0
m"
5i°"''
Hi-
7
B * 40
III -
3 is".
Z So
s 5 r »
C S 5
85 »
14
s - l!
Si*. '0
lli' •
S «s *
3 2 ~"
2
S~l x ,..
Is*
1 | 5 '•«
SSS o
a i *
30
2
a 11
11' ,
ill •
o ? 10
£
1
14,000
17,000
10,000
J
** 8,000
\
O 4.000
- 4,000
z
B 1.000
1
K o
2
5 600
C. 500
S
6 .a,
5
300
TOO
m
0
^^^v/V/
^^y \ /
, TOTAL, EXCLUDING OEMISTEB & KOCH HLAY
/_ '
s^
, OEMIiTEl 1 KOCH TMY
/ ;
t INLET (IN-LINE M£TE»)
/_^ — " — '
nT^Q-^^^O O O OL
^S* INLET (LAI)
LOO<>O<><>CL J
^^^_^-*> ^ OUTLET (LAIt
10 160 280 300 170 340 1«0 380 400 470 *40 440 4fl
TEST TIME, houn
C* LINDA* DAY
_
"^ ~~*
, TOTAL
r-^ L-— ^"
. (NiOtUILtl (AlHl
/
L— — _/—-
^— ]
^— j
j CALCIUM (CoO)
/ / TOTAL SULFUB (SO.)
J /
c^t^ ^A^A.^ /_/\
"^e^^^^e^^d
/ -9JLFITE (SOj)
^ O^-,_, _t-O
i i i i i i i i i 1 i
10 760 780 300 370 MO 360 380 400 4 20 440 440 44
TEST TIME, houn
CALtNDAl DAY
•
.
•
.
.
-
•
•
•
_
NO ANAIYTICAL WMnES TAKEN
•
•
•
, , 1 I I I I . . I
91
«0
81
BO
7S
10
B
4
*
1
..0
»
3.0
1.3
1.3
1.1
0 '
3D
40
10
10
14
1}
10
a
4
4
1
1.0
o
10
11
»
13
10
j
10
14,000
11,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
1,000
0
600
500
400
300
no
100
0
Gat Rail • 25,000 Kf rn 0 300 °f
Liquor Rili - 1,200 gpn
L/G - 64 gil/mrf
Gn Velocity • 8.8 II/K
E.H.T. RnidenoTim>- 20 min
Thrm Stagei, 5 in ipheres/itage
Gu Inlet SO2 Cone." 2.200-2.600 ppm
Scrubber Inlet Liquor Temp." 123-127 °F
Liquid Conductivity " 18,000 - 22,400 XL mhot/cm
e (CUriled Solidi Cone. - 36-38 wt %
Figure B-2 (Continued)
OPERATING DATA FOR TCA
RUN 510-2A
?40 160 280 300 310 340 160 330
TEST TIME, hwn
I 7/8 1 7/V I 7/'0 I 7/11 I 7/11 I 7/13
CAUNDAJI DAY
7/1S I 7/16
B-5
-------
°"gf
1EGIN (UN 506-31
//
70,000
11.000
16,000
- 14,000
J
^ 11.000
. 10,000
O
E 6,000
^ 4,000
s
s 2'tTO
« 0
• TOTAL CmitXVtD 1OLIDS A CHLOKIDt (Cl ' ) ^7 POTASSIUM (KM • SULFITE (SO - }
- O CA1.CKJM (Co** ) 4 MAGNESIUM {Mg ** ) Q CAR»ONAn (CO ' )
O SULfATE (504 ' ) i SODIUM (No * ) •
' *
.
•
A
A A
o
o - o
! 8 8 8 "
70.030
18.000
16.000
14,000
11,000
10.000
1.000
e.oop
4,000
0
Gil Rltl • 20.000 icf m » 330° F
Liquor Rm • 800 ipm Itotil)
U0-63|ll/mcf
Gn Velocity • 5.1 ft/ac
E.H.T. Undines Time-3) min
Mtrt.ll Bid Height - 3.5 in
Ga Inlat S02 Cone. • 2,300-3,100 ppm
Scrubber Inlet Liquor Tlmp. - 122-129 °F
Liquid Conductivity • 23.000,32.000 M. mhot/cm
Dietergi (Cimrrfugi) Solidi Cone. • 60-66 wt %
TEST TIME, houn
t/17 I 4/18
CALENDAI DAY
M Figure B-3
110 OPERATING DATA FOR MARBLE-BED
! RUN 506-3A & 3B
B-6
-------
BED & TOP SPHAY HEADERS (LJPPtR TAP FOR POI 30CW
RAISED If In. ON JUNE ?B, 1*73)
Gu Rate = 20,000 icfm 9 330°F
Liquor Rate* BOOgpm
L/C-S3 B«l/md
GBI Velocity- 5.t ft/we
E.H.T. Reiidenci Tims • 30 min
Marble Bad Height - 3.5 In
Gai Inlet S02 Cone,» 2,100-3,200 ppm
Scrubber Inlet Liquor Temp. - 122-130 °F
Liquid Condudiviiy « 25,000-30,600 u, mhot/cm
Otscnarge (Cintrif ugi) Solidl Cone. • 60-66 wt %
nn TIME, h
4/23 I 4/26 I 4/77 I 6/M
CAIENDAI DAY
4/?9 I 4/» I 7/1 I
10.000
18,000
14,000
-£ 14,000
r- 17,000
f
. 10,000
2 8,000
2 6.000
z
; «,ooo
1 J-wo
3
• IOTA! DISSOLVED SOUK A CHLOHM (Cl ' ) O CARIONATE (COj ' )
. O CAlCIUM(d** 1 * MAGNESIUM (Mo *+) a
D suLFAn no, • ) fi SODIUM (N,, * j •
^ fOIAJJtUM(K + J
• • SULFITE (50 - )
3 •
.
. A
A
*
o o ^
a a o a
70,000
18,000
14,000
U.OOO
17,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
7,000
0
TEST TIME, taun
4/7? I 4/1
CALENDAR DAY
Figure B-3 (Continued)
™ OPERATING DATA FOR MARBLE-BED
? RUN 506-3A & 3B
B-7
-------
Appendix C
TEST RUN INSPECTION SUMMARY TABLES
C-l
-------
Table C-l
Hun No. 501-1A (Depletion Stage) on Strata 16 Hours
Operating Date April 9 thru April 10, 1973
Conponent
Gas Inlet Duct
Vanturl
Scrubber
Afterscrubber
HoMlAB.
TO _spr<..
uemister
Kluah (2)
Chevron Stain-
less Stml
Demlster
Rsheater
IB Fan
Miscellaneous
(1) Bete Fog
(2) Top - 8p:
Bottom -
Scale
*
10 mil scale on walls
and in flooded elbow.
5 mil Intermittent
acale in afterscrubber
section, on and below
trapout tray, on and
below demlster scrubber
at second from bottom
Blurry header.
5 all scale on fourth
(Tap) and second slurry
header systems and
bottoa demiater spray
headers. (SO,-50.6J vt.
C02-2.0( Yt.fso2-36.St
«t., Ash-10.« vt. ).
5 mil scale precipitate
on bottom vanes.
*
*
*
T? us res
tying Systems Co. No. 1
Spraying Systems Co. Ho.
Solids Deposits
*
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Top completely free of solids.
*
»
»
I 7
3/1* H 6 w
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Time
First noticed
«
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
»
»
»
•Denotes not applicable or not inspected.
C-3
-------
Table C-2
Run Ko. 501-1A
On Stream 629 Hours
Operating Date April 10 thru Kay 9, 1973
Component
Gas Inlet Duct
Vraturi
Scrubber
Aftericrubber
Nozzle I. \
C 'Spn..
Demister
Plush w
Chevron Stain-
less Steel
Denister
Reheater
Component
ID Far
Miscellaneous
(1) Bete For, TF
(2) Top - Sprayl
Bottom - Spi
Scale
Negligible
Scattered thin scale
precipitate on valla;
flooded elbo« had 35
mil scale. (30,-53.9*i*.
CaO-lU.TK rt,, SO2-29.
6f, wt., Ash-1.7* wt.)
Intermittent scale in
afterscrubber section;
25 nil on and below
trapout tray;?? nil at
second from bottom
header spray area. 15
mil on and below denJate:
(S03-57.8j6 wt., SOj-
15.3* wt., CaO-21.lt*
vt., Ash-4.9< wt.)
2^ mil scale on second
header nozzles; 15 mil
soale on top header
nozzleo.
15 mil scale on bottom
vanes; scattered scale
deposit on top of vanes
(S03-66.6£ vt. , COp-SDjt
wt., SOo-Trsce, Ash-
25.7* wt. )
«
Scale
*
*
18 FC1!
ig Sys ems Co. Mo. 1 H 7
lying Systems Co. Ho. 3/
Solids Deposits
3 ft. 3 flyash accumulation In
horizontal section of ductwork
upstream of saturation sprays.
(Result of 2lt?5 operating hours)
Negligible
12 ft.3 solids deposit on bottom
of trapout tray. Scattered 3 inel
deep deposits on top slurry and
demlster bottom vash headers.
_totally
^iFive slurry nozzles' plugged/ foul
slurry nozzles partially plugged
in afterscrubber section.
Negligible
1/8 inch dry solids in duct abort
reheater; 3 burners cleaned.
Rollds Deposits
Thin dry solids film on fan
Blades
*
H 6 w
Deterioration During Test Pun Or At Time
First noticed
negligible
Guide vane bolts and surrounding area continue to
erode; two of eight annealed 316 stainless steel
bolts warrant removal.
Negligible
Slurry afterscrubber nozzles vere worn but In good
coalition .
The 316 stainless steel demlster was lightly pitted
and corroded with sons bent vanss from bMflUng but
demlster was in good condition. Stainless steel
demister was removed and polypropylene demister In-
stalled.
Stainless steel sleeve was severely deformed on the
north side In teardropahape, several SMil cracks
£ l^rw^r&t^^fW itfaffir-01" OTar
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tim
First Noticed
Negligible
*
^Denotes not applicable or not inspected.
C-4
-------
Table C-3
Run Ho. 502-1A
276 Hours
Operating Data June 13 thru June 26, 1973
Conporwnt
Qaa Inlet Duct
Vcnturl
Scrubber
Aftersc rubber
Nor.z3.eB /^
Spray
Dealster
Flush (2)
Chevron Poly-
propylene
Demi ate r
BeheaUr
ID Pan
Conpcnent
MleoeLlAnaoufl
'!) Beto ?oC TT
(2) Top - Spra;-'l
Bottom - ^-p*
Scale
*
5 mil scale on walls;
30 nil scale on walls
of flooded elbow.
(S03-l*3.6£ wt.,
002-7.9* «t..
S02-19.3]t wt., Ash-
6.5* wt.)
10 oil acale on v&lls
bene&th trapout tray
Negliclble
1/16 inch scale on top
vanes.(S03-l(7.2t vt.,
SOg-H.5* wt., OOj-
2.BJ vt., C»O-1.6| «t.,
A«h-33.9* wt.)
«
*
Scale
*
8 FCT
ig Systems Co. Ko. U^7
ylng Syatcma Co. I.o. 3/1
Solids Depoaiti
«
Negligible
U ft. 3 Bollds depoolt on bottom
of trmpout ti«y. Scattered ^2
Inch solids deposlta on top
slurry header and bottom demlBtei
wash header.
One plugged Blurry nozzle
Scattered Infrequent solids de-
poBltB on bottom vanes; about
1/3 ft.2 flow area IB blocked at
four corners at demlstor aupport
bar Junctions.
1/16 Inch dry Bolide In duct
above reheater
Thin dust coating on fan blades]
fan danpers had no significant
solids deposition.
Sollda Deposits
*
H6w
Deterioration During Test Run Or Jit Tlffl»
First Rotlcei
*
north and eaet guide vane cross braces were eroded
In arc shapes of 5 Inch length t!3/l6 inch maxima
depth and 5i Inch length, 1 Inch mxlnnm depth
respectively. Th« tonth and vest cross braces vere
eroded to arc ahtps but las* severely. The guide
vanes, guide vane bolts, sod splash seal nuts and
oolti vere alao significantly eroded. Most of the
erosion took place In 923 hours slnoe the February "Q
*.gli#,l. OUtaee'
AfterBcrubber slurry nozclsa vere eroded but still
In good condition.
negligible
StainleBs steal sleeve continues to deteriorate but
at slover rate than in put. Sleeve 1* severely
bulged and varped on the north side vlth tvo cracks,
eachtafi Inches long. Refractory has deteriorated
slightly, IB severely cracked, but it 111 Intact.
Burners are oil coated but not daoaeed or deformed.
Negligible
Deterioration During teat Run Or At Tine
First noticed
*
•Denotes not applicable or not Inspected
C-5
-------
Table C-4
Run Bo. 503-1*
On Streaa
Operating Date June 29 thru July 11, 1973
Component
Gas Joint Duct
Venturl
Scrubber
Afterscrubber
Nozzles . .
^epray
Deniistei
Flush!2)
Chevron Poly-
propylene
Demiater
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
(1) Bete Fog
(2) Top - Spl
Bottom -
Scale
*
SO mil scale on walla;
35 mil scale on walla to
flooded elbow.
(S0,-79.1< vt., 000-831
wt.? 80,-0.9* wt., A«h-
15. C* wt., CaO-2.6* wt.
15 mil scale on walls
beneath trapout tray.
Much of scale on wall
below demlster had dis-
solved and disappeared,
during test ^03-lA.
Hone
None
*
*
*
TT W FCN
ayiug Systems Co. Mo. 1
Spraying Systems Co. No.
Solids Deposlta
*
negligible
£~1 Inch solids deposit on bottos
of trapout tray.
Three slurry spray noieles were
plugged by debris.
Scattered, noounlform £-1 inch
solids deposits on top of bottom
vane and on tecond vans ; four
co rner sections were heaviest
covered as about 1/3 of their
flow area Has blocked rt'top of
bottom vane.
*
*
*
17
3/U H6W
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tloe
First Noticed
*
Erosion on guide vane crosi braces continues.
negligible
negligible
Negligible
«
*
*
•Denotes not applicable or not inspected.
Table C-5
and
On Stream
23 Hours
Operating Data July U thru July 12, 1973
Component
Oas Inlat Duet
Venturl
Scrubber
Afterscrubber
BozEles
(l)Bpn
Demistei
Fi.ush (2)
Chevron Poty-
propylene
Demlster
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
(1) Bete Fog
(2) Top - Spr
. Bottom -
Scale
.
3; oil scale on walls;
30 mil scale on walls ol
flooded elbow;
(S0,-(te.li5[ wt., C02-1.7ll
wt., S0,-2.lllt wt., Aoh-
13.3* wt.)
30 mil scale on walls
beneath trapout tray.
Some of scale on walls
from previous runs had
dissolved and diaapperei
Negligible
Negligible
«
*
*
tT 148 FCN
ylng Systems Co. No. 1 I
praying Systems Co. No.
Solids Deposits
*
negligible
0-3/8 Inch soft solids on bottom
of trapout tray.
One plugged slurry noizle in
afterscrubber.
£-1 inch solids present on 7/11
are slightly leas prevalent on
7/12/73.
1/8 inch dry solids deposit In
gas duct above reheater.
1*2 inch non-uniform solids ds-
poslt on fan Inlet dampers.
•
7
3/U H 6 W
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Time
First Noticed
*
Erosion of guide vans cross braces has contlned; the
*n*^H"ffln depth of the arc shape pattern on the north
and east aides hale increased to 3/16 and 1/8 Inch
respectively in 278 operating hours. The south and
east guide vaae cross braces had not significantly
eroded during this tijne period.
Sams of 316 stainless steel piping supports were
algnlgleantly pitted but still In good condition.
Negligible
Some broken and warped plastic denlster vanes, but
demlster Is still In good condition. It has been In
place since May 10th Inspection; 556 operating hours.
Three large cracks In stainless steel sleeve (1-2 ft.
long, 2-1 ft. lonf) at section Joints. Steel reheater
shell showed no discoloration since 6/26/73 (278 nrs.)
negligible
*
•Denotes not applicable or not Inspected.
C-6
-------
Huo Ro.
506-1A
Table C-6
On Stream Ul7 hour« Operating Date 7/29/73 - 6/13/73
Co-ponent
Gas Inlet Duct
Venturl
Scrubber
After Scrubber
Nozclea
Spray U)
De misters
Chevron
Polypropylene
Demlster (a)
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
W Used both t
Scale
*
15 oil scale on walla;
15 mil scale on flooded
elbow walla.
20 mil acale on all 't
alurry spray headers ani
on bottom half of wall
expanse between trapout
tray and demlster.
20 mil scale on after
scrubber slurry nozzles.
5 mil deposit on
scrubber walls above
demister.
SO,-V».25(HT Aah-27.2#fl
SO|-27.9*HT CCj- .7*W
*
*
bp and bottom demister fl
Sollda Deposits
*
Small amount of aollda under
splaah seal flange.
Three k ft* of solids on bottom
of trapout tray and on walls
adjacent to trapout tray.
3 plugged alurry nozzlea in
after scrubber.
Large aollda fell on top from
gaa duct above.
Several deposits of ntflCOin^
at reheater outlet. &: 2 inch
aollda on gaa duct walls above
reheater.
5 inch solids deposits on bottom
of inlet dampers.
*
ush * Denotes not applicable)
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tin*
First noticed
•
Erosion continues on north and east guide vans
crosa braces, guide vanes , and guide vane nut-bolt
assemblies. Erosion continuing on top splash seal
flange. Hirlmim depth of arc shapes on north and
east guide vane cross braces bad lncreajeO/32
and 3/1^ inches respectively during U17 hours.
negligible
negligible
Large solids deposits (one of 3/U ft5) fell on
plastic demlater from gaa duct above and did
significant damage. 10$ of top vanes wen shatter**
by these sollda. Plastic demlater was removed
and SS demister was installed.
Refractory was severely cracked but still intact.
Sleeve was distorted badly at north side,* cracks
between section Joints.
Experienced considerable difficulty during test run
in controlling gaa flow by gaa damper positioning
and had several shear pin failures on damper linkage
between dampers and damper control drive.
Venturl SO? outlet probe (AF1020) was partially
covered with solids; too extensive a covering on
or not inspected.
CT) Bete Fog IF W FCH
(2) Top - Spraying Systems Co. No. 1 H 7 ,
Bottom - Spraying Systems Co. No. 3A H 6 W
Table C-7
Run No.
507-1A
On Stream
Operating Date
6/22/73 -
Conponent
Oas Inlet Duct
Venturl
Scrubber
After Scrubber
Nozzles
Spray U)
Demlster
Flush (2)
Chevron SS
Demister
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
* Denotes not
(1) Bete Fog
(2) Top - Sp:
Bottom -
Scale
*
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
20-UO mil loose
crystalline scale on
walla above demiater.
*
*
»
ppllcable or not inspect
IF Ii8 FCN
aylng Systems Co. No. 1
Spraying Systems Co. No.
Solids Deposits
*
^ 5 mil solids on walls and
flooded elbow.
Negligible
One alurry nozzle was plugged.
Light dust coating on top and
bottom vanes was* 5 mil thick.
Several 2 Inch thick small
aollda deposits fell from gas
duct and lay on top.
Carbon deposit in No. 3 burners.
Solids in duct above reheater.
Negligible
*
ed.
1 7
3/"t H 6 H
Deterioration During Teat Run Or At Tins
First noticed
»
No additional eroalon on guide vane cross braces
during this 163 hour period. Some erosion of
corrosion specimens and aplash seal flange* Haynea
6B and 316 SS test wear bars were Installed on top
of north and east cross bracea.
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Refractory was severely cracked»a 1/2 ft hole
been oxidlied in the S3 sleeve opposite the No
burner; another 1/2 ft2 hole next to It due to
sleeve joint separation.
has
. 2
Negligible
*
C-7
-------
Table C-8
507-U
On Stnu 271 Sour*
Operating Data 8/89/73 - 9/9/73
Component
Oea Inlat Duct
Venturl
Scrubber
After scrubber
•OUlM
Bprajr I1)
"• lat»5»
Flush (2)
Chevron 8S
Dosdater
Reheater
ID Tan
Miscellaneous
•Denotes not a;
(1) Bate yog
(2) torp - S]
Bottom •
Seal*
*
Bon*
Ion*
Segllgtble
*
•
»
?llcable or not inspecte
IT 48 KB
raying System Co. Bo. 1
Spraying Systems Co. He
Solid! Deposits
*
3-lt Inch lollla on Venturl kails
around bull noult. 8«aU
asBunt (
-------
Table C-10
Run No.
509-1*. 5H-1*
520-1A, S32-U
Oa 8tr»a»
80 BOOM
Operating Date 9/U/73 - 9/16/73
Component
Oai Inlet
Duct (a)
Venturl
Scrubber (b)
After
Scrubber
Roat lea
Spray (1)
Deals ter
flush (2)
Chevron 88
Demi.ter
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
fa) saturatioi
(b) Ho slurry
' Denotes no
Scale
Negligible
Hone
10 mil acale on walla
beneath trapout tray.
Hone
•one
*•
•
eprays (raw water) were
low to Venturl scrubber
applicable or not InapJ
Solids Deposits
1 inch thick, 6 inch wide band
at saturation spray area.
Some of solids around boll
nozzle of 9/10/73 inspection
were gone.
Hone
3 plugged slurry nozilea in
after scrubber section.
Heavy aollda on top and bottom,
Top - 3/k inch aollda in HI
corner
. i/li inch in 81
. 3/8 Inch in 8V
- 1/2 inch In RV quadrant.
Bottom had 1/2-1 inch wedge
deposit blocking 50j of flow
area on east aide, l/k inch
aolida on weat aide. *
1/16 inch aollda in duct above
reheat er. Carbon deposit in
burner Ho. 2.
1-1/Z inch (avg) 3 inch (mx)
solids on bottom of damper
blades.
•
uaed aa there waa no flow to the >
cted
Deterioration During Teat Run Or At TIM
First noticed
Hegliglble
Continued erosion on apper flange of aplaah aeal
and ita accompanying nut-bolt aaseabllesi. 1/3 of
nuta on Inalde position of north and ea*t guide TSUM
cross bra/sea eroded away. 316 88 wear bar waa more
severely eroded than Raynea 6B but eroaion waa more
aevere on eaat side than on north aide.
negligible
Hegliglble
negligible
83 aleeve has 2-1/2 ft* hol», one waa Bade by
oxidation, by Bo. 2 burner. Refractory eracka
up to 2inchea wide but not aa deep aa to reheater
shell. Hew aleere and refractory Is being Install*
Hegliglble
•
enturl scrubber.
«te Pog TF 1)8 rai
:op - Spraying Systeoa Co. Ho. 1 H 1, Bottom - Spraying System Co. Ho. 3/k H 6 V
C-9
-------
Table C-ll
Hun go. 501-2A (Depletion Phase)
On Streaa Hour*
22 Hour*
Operating Bates 3/22/73 - 3/83/73
Component
Oas Inlet
Duet
TO Scrubber
Boules
Spray (1)
Cooling (g)
Chevron SB
Deadster
Beheater
n> Fan
Miscellaneous
(1) Spraco
(2) Ceraml
* Denotes not
Scale
negligible
5 mil scale precipitate
on mill beneath bottom
bed. (803-19.7* Wt,
BOz - 32.9* Wt, Aab -
39.1* Wt).
Hone
1-2 nil scale on
bottoB veaes.
»
*
*
full cone, free flow noi
nozale (5/8 Inch openlu
applicable or not Inapet
Solids Deposits
1/5 of ventri-rod gas flow
airtta was plugged by 3 ft3
of solids.
•one
Bone
Bone
Hone
Light limestone dust on
blade*.
*
let, Bo. 1969.
).
ted.
Deterioration During Kit Rim Or it Tim
nret noticed
Begllglbls
Begllglble
Bone
Begllglble
Befractoiy and 88 ileeve were in T»ry good condition.
Begllglble
*
Table C-12
Run Bo.
On Strean Hour! 253 Hbure ________ Operating Da.te» 3/23/73 - V6/73
(xy» emce i»et cleaning ventri-rod) ~~^^^~~^""~~^^^^~1
Component
Oaa Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
Boulee
Spray u)
Cooling (2)
Chevron SS
Demlater
Beheater
ID ran
Mlecellajieoua
Denotes no*
(1) Spraco :
(2) Ceraaic
Open pi
Scale
*
5 ail iron oxide scale
on valli inmllately
beneath Koch tr&y.
Hone
l/l£ Inch scale
precipitate on bottoa
vanea.
Begligible
Bone
*
applicable or not Inipc
•all cone, free flow noci
noule (5/8 i°ch opening
je nipple (1.0 inch openl
Bolide Depoaita
70* of ventrl-rod aisenbly
blocked by 5 ft3 of solid!.
Bone
Bone
•egllglbl.
negligible
Light dust coating.
*
cted.
ea, lo. 19&9.
3/83/73 - 3/2T/73
tig)3/27/73 - W73
Deterioration During Test Bun Or At Tins
First Hoticed
Begllglble
Bone
negligible
Beoliglble
88 sleeve hid not warped or deformed. Beheater refractory
above the burners had cracked and exposed expanded astal
retaining grid; rerraetory *as repaired.
MiTlnrnm fan blade defonatlon from straight line patten
mm .167 inch.
*•
C-10
-------
Table C-13
•o. 501-a*
On Stream Hours
92 Bouri
Opening D.t.._VVra-Vn/73_
Component
Oas inlet
Duet
TCA Scrubber
Hollies . .
spray t1/
Cooling '2'
Chevron 88
Demliter
Reheater
10 Fan
Mlscellaneoui
(I) Spraco
(2) Ceramic
Denote! c
Scale
negligible
negligible
*
*
*
*
»
Full cone, free flow noil
nosile (5/8 Inch openlni
t applicable or not Ins]
Solid. Depoeltl
6of of ventrl-rod flow
area was blocked by about
U-l/2 ft3 solids deposit.
legliclble
*
»
*
*
•
,e«, Bo. 1969
ected.
Deterioration During Teet HOD Or At Tiae
ririt Noticed
Ie«ll«lble
negligible
«
«
«
*
*
Run HO._501-2A
Table C-14
On Stream Hours 86 Hours
Operating Date. V^/73 - V1&/73
Component
das inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
Hossles
Spray (O
Cooling (2
Chevron 88
Dealster
Reheater
10 ?an
Mlscellaneoui
(1} Spraco
^2) Ceramic
Denotes nc
Scale
•egllglble
negligible
negligible
negligible
*
»
•
'ull cone, free flow nosi
noule (5/8 Inch opening
applicable or not insp<
Solids Deposits
5 ft3 of solids had
blocked 500 of ventri-rod
flow area (solid vaa
deposited In 86 hours).
k - 5 Inch solids deposit
on west wall beneath Koch
tray.
Ventrl-rod was renored
and replaced with the
U original Bete Tog nommle
(8T 2U KS\ . Riree of four
slurry nossles were
partially plugged.
negligible
*
*
*
es, Ho. 1969.
cted.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tlsu
first noticed
negligible
The flange of the a«ln steam sparger line Lasida the
scrubber bad partially separated. Tare* of fear nut-bolt
assemblies required replacement.
Ceramic cooling spray noule for Twatrl-rod was found
broken.
negligible
•
*
*
C-ll
-------
Table C-15
Run HQ. 501-2*
On Stream Bouri
127 hoars
Operating Date. V"/73 - V23/73
Component
Oea Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
Nozzles
8p«y I l>
Cooling *z
Chevron 83
Demister
Reheater
ID Faa
Miscellaneous
(1) Spraco t
(2) Four, Be
Denotes no
Scale
Negligible
negligible
Negligible
Negligible
«
*
*
all cone, free flow nozz!
be Tog 8t-2U FCN nozzles,
b applicable or not Inapt
Solids Depoiltl
1» ft3 solidi deposit
upstream of cooling spray
nozzles.
2-3 inch ilurry solids
on the eatt and vest walla
beneath Koch tray.
The top cooling spray
nozzle, a Bete Fog
ST 32 FCN nozsle vss
plugged. Replaced Bete
Foe nozzle »lth Spraco TIB
nozzle.
negligible
1/3 gallon of carbon vas
deposited at Ho. 2 burner.
1/16 inch solids covered
duct above reheater.
Light dust coating on
blades.
*
e>, Ho. 1969.
cted.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tias
Flrit Sotlced
H«gll4iM«
Entire 5 Inch saddle bed had fallen into the bottom bed
due to t holei In support grid, roar of six (rid sections
at this elevation were replaced.
negligible
negligible
S3 ileeve vas itlll of circular shape and vai not deformed.
Decently repaired refractory (April 6th) vas in excellent
condition.
Negligible
About one dozen colLapead spheres in each bed were replaced
Table C-16
502-2A
On Stream Hours 889 Hours
Operating Petes VCT/7? - 5/10/73
Component
3as Inlet
Duct
FCA Scrubber
Nozzles
Spray (1)
Cooling (2
atevroo SS
Demist er
Reheater
CP Fan
4iscellaneovu
fl) Spraco
(2) Four, S
* Denotes nc
Scale
Negligible
5 mil scale on walla
beneath bottom grid.
*
Negligible
*
*
*
ull cone, free flow nozc
>raco 7 LB 316 SS nozzles
applicable or not insp<
Solids Deposits
A «edge ahapea, It- 1/2 ft3
solids deposit had accumu-
lated on the bottom of the
gafl duct upstream of cool-
Ing gpray.
Scattered 0-3 inch solids
accumulation on bottom of
Koch tray.
North cooling spray nozzle
vat plugged.
Negligible
*
»
»
es, No. 1969.
cted.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tine
First Noticed
Negligible
negligible
negligible
Negligible
*
*
0-201 puop shaft seal vas repacked.
C-1Z
-------
Table C-17
Bun go. 502-2A
On Stream Hour« 868 Hour«
Operating Dates
5/10/73 - 5/21/73
Component
0»f Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
HosBlea *.*
Spray 1J>
Coollng(2)
Chevron 88
Denloter
Reheater
ID FAN
Hlacellaneoui
* Denotea not
(I) Spraco :
(2) rour, Bl
Scale
negligible
Insignificant localise
icallng.
Negligible
Negligible Additional
Scale.
»
*
*
applicable or not Inape
ull cone, free flow noiE
te Fog ST-32 FCN no»le>
Sollda Deposltl
60-70t of gas duct flow
area immediately upstream
of cooling spray noiiles
blocked by 7-1/2 ft3 of
solids.
One Inch solids deposit on
slurry noislee; no other
additional solids.
3 of U cooling spray
nosslea plugged.
2 south slurry Inlet spray
noBclea partially plugged.
Bottom vane flov area of
west quadrant 50$
blocked by solids.
»
*
*
ted.
es, No. 1969.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tine
First Noticed
Negligible
Grid wires In several areas of the top and bottoa bed grids
were noticeably eroded during test run) however, no (rldl
were removed.
Negligible
Negligible
•
*
*
Table C-18
, Bo. 503-2A - 506-2A
On Stream Hours l63 Hour«
Operating Dates 5/&/T3 - 5/29/73
Component
Oaa Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
Ho"lM m
Spray I1'
Cooling (2
Chevron 38
Demlater
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneouj
(l) Spraco
(2) Four, Bi
* Denotes i
Scale
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
*
»
ull cone, free flow nois
te ?og ST-32 rCN notsles
ot applicable or not ins
Solids Deposits
$-1/2 ft3 wedge shape
deposit on bottom of gas
duct Immediately upstream
of cooling sprays.
NOTE: To prevent solids
buildup In the gas duct,
the sootblover noule
and blowing cycle was
altered as well as the
bottom cooling spray
noule was capped.
2-3 Inch solids on west
wall, and 1 Inch on east
wall, Immediately below
Koch tray.
South cooling spray
nofile and aasoc lated
header were plugged.
Southeast slurry nossle
was partially plugged.
Negligible
Negligible
1 inch solids accumulation
on bottoB of Inlet dampers
*
es, No. 1969.
wcted.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Time
First Noticed
Negligible
Loosening, bending and erosion of grid wires continues.
Two grid sections of the bottom k»d were replaced; in
one, k lineal inches of wire were missing.
Negligible
Negligible
Reheater refractory above burner* cracked and closed
expanded metal to flame. Reheater sleeve is still
circular end in good condition. Several small section
cracks at welds.
Negligible
*Z> 1% of plastic spheres were damaged. Berth steam
sparge header under the loch tray had vibrated loose
the main header.
from
C-13
-------
Table C-19
Run Ho.
509-2A
On Stream Hour!
1465 Hours
Operating Bates 6/5/73 - 6/25/73
Component
Gas Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubbei
Nozzles . .
Spray
Cooling''
Chevron SS
De mister
Reheater
ID Pan
Mlscellaneou
* Denotea n
(1) Spraco
(2) Three,
Scale
Negligible
60 nil scale on valla
beneath bottom bed.
(S03-71.6t Wt. S02 -
2.2% Wt, CaO-5.8t Wt
Ash-20.ltl( Wt) 35 mil
acale on walls be-
neath top and bottom
beds.
Negligible
1/16 Inch acale on
bottom and second fro
bottom vanes (SO?-
67.9* Wt, CaO-OJt Wt,
302 -2.7* Wt, ABh-
28.6* Wt).
»
Negligible
3t applicable or not ins]
rull cone, free flov nozi
ete Fog ST-32 FCN no»l<
Solids Deposits
Negligible
1/2 ft2 of scale-solid!
stalactites on HE corner
of bottom grid (S03-l|8.8*
Wt, S02-9.3*Wt, Ash-lH. 7
Wt).
North cooling spray
notile yes plugged; all
1* slurry spray nocsles
were partially plugged.
Negligible
1/16 Inch dry flaky solid
above reheater.
Light dust coating.
»
ected.
lea, No. 1969.
i.
Deterioration During Teit
First noticed
Hun or At Tla»
Negligible
Grid vires continue to deteriorate
had broken vires; U grid sections were
paired In place by tackveldlng.
Pin top grid Motions
replaced,* one was re-
Negligible
Negligible
Tvo small cracks (p:3 and 6 Inches long) at section joints
of S3 aleeve. Refractory in excellent condition since its
repair during 5/30-6/5 outage. Burner shrouds are in good
condition, not oxldlced.
Negligible
K, 20% spheres
otherwise) damaged.
collapsed or vitro,
Run Ro.
510-2A
Table C-20
On Stream Hours a97 Hours
Operating Eats, 6/S7/T3 - 7/10/73
Component
Sal Inlet
Duct
ICA Scrubber
Hollies
Bpray (1)
Cooling (2)
Chevron SS
Demiater
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
\
* Denotea no'
(1) Spraco
(2) Three,
Scale
Negligible
30 oil scale on walls
beneath bottom grid (SO
7ll.5* Wt, S02-1.5»Wt,
Ash-22.7% Vt} 20 mil
scale on walla above
bottom bed.
65 mil acale on slurry
noaslea (S0,-6l.9jt Wt,
CaO-0* Wt, 802-10.14% Wt
Ash-25.1% Wt).
60 mil scale covered
bottom vanes (so,-75.2-jt
Wt, CaO-0% Wt, SOo-
2.8t Wt, ABh-21.i(J Wt)
*
1/3 of the bottom grid
waa covered with 1/U
inch stalactite acale.
(303-91. 8)1 Wt, Ash-9.2(
Wt, SOa-1.8* Wt)
applicable or not inape
ull cone, free flow noil
lete Fog ST-32 FCH nozllc
Solids Deposits
Negligible
Negligible
Top and south cooling spray
noailea were partially
plugged. All It slurry
noaalea were partially
plugged.
1/2 inch Bolida between
bottom vanes In SW corner.
Other sections partially
plugged.
1/8 inch dry solids in gas
duct above reheater.
Light dust coating on
bladea. Nonunlform 1-2
Inch sollda accumulation on
inlet daapers.
•
ted.
les, No. 1969.
I.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Ties
first Noticed
Negligible
Loose and bent grid vires were discovered on seven 1 grids,
but grlda did not require replacement.
All U Blurry notile throats were eroded and contained 1/16
inch grooves; noulea are still In good condition, however.
Negligible
S3 sleeve had 5 cracks, only 2 are significant ( - It and
8 laches loag))001y one email crack above Ho. 2 burner in
refractory.
Negligible
*
C-14
-------
Table C-21
Run No.
511-aA
On Stream Hourfl
15 Hours
Operating Pates 7/10/73 - 7/11/73
Component
Oas Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
Hollies
Spray (1)
Cooling (2)
Chevron S3
De mister
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
* Denotes no
(1) Spraco :
(2) Three, 1
Scale
Negligible
5-10 mil scale on botto
of bottom grld,Jn 15 he
period 50% of grit
Previous italactlte
ecale had Increaaed In
length .OSlnch (SOj-771
Wt, S0,-2.17* Wt, 00,-
3.2< Wt, Ash-17.7* Wt
present composition)
0.3 Inch acattered
acale vaa more denaely
populated on eaat and
north valla than on
7/10/73.
Negligible
•
»
*
*
applicable or not Inapt
ull cone, free flov noxi
ate Fog flT-32 FCH noule
Solids Depoalta
Negligible
a *
ir
UX14 SCoIrd .
Negligible
*
*
*
*
cted.
.as. No. 1969.
Deterioration During Teat Run Or At Tina
First Hotlced
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
*
*
*
*
Table C-22
Run No. 5H-2A. 512-2A. 513-2A On Str
Operating Date July 11 thru July 11, 1973
Component
Gaa Inlet Duet
TCA Scrubber
ironies
(1) Spray
(2) Cooling
Chevron Stain-
leaa Steel
Demlater
Reheater
ID Fan
Miscellaneous
(1) Spraco fu
(2) Three, Be
Scale
Negligible
15 mil acale on vails
beneath bottom bed. Hie
5-10 mil scale on 50J
of the bottom crld on
July 11 had disappeared,
•
4
*
W
»
1 cone, free flov noiili
e Fog BT-32 KB noillea,
Solids Deposits
Negligible
3/l6 Inch soft solids on valve
rims on bottom of Koch tray. ^
Inch solids on vest vail beneath
Koch tray.
I'orth cooling epray nocele part-
ially plugged.
Additional £ inch solids on
bottom vanes In southvest corner
remainder had 1/8 inch additions
aollds buildup.
*
*
Top of Koch tray had ^5 oil
aolids deposit even vitb no Irrl.
gatlon vater during 6£ hours of
testa 512-2A and 513-2A.
a, Ho. 1969.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Tioa
First noticed
Negligible
Five grid sections vere replaced due to loose and/or
bent vires. One lineal inch of vire vas missing from
the vest central section of the bottom grid.
Cooling spray nettles (ST-32 FCN) have eroded signifi-
cantly after 1340 hours operation, but are still quite
operative .
Negligible
4
*
•Denote! not applicable or not Inspected.
C-15
-------
Table C-23
Run Ho.
51U-2A
On stream Hours
1*93 HOUTI
Operating Dates 7/22/73 - 8/13/73
Component
Oes Inlet
Duct
TCA Scrubber
Howies
Spray (1)
Cooling (2)
Chevron SS
Demlater
R Chester
ID ran
Mlacellaneou.
* Denotes m
(1) Spraco :
(2) Three ,B<
Scale
Negligible
3 mil scale below
bottom bed. 30 mil ac
between second and
third beds. 60 mil
scale between top bed
and Koch tray.
«O> 20% or flow area
waa plugged by 1/6
inch (avgj scale on
bottom two vanes.
(SO.-50.9* Wt, 80,-
O.lif Wt, Ash-US. T% Wt;
*
*
75% of bottom grid was
covered with varying
scale-solids deposits;
some areas were covers
with as much aa 3/*+ an
1 inch stalactites.
(S0,-n.7* Wt, SOa-
3. U", Wt, CaO-2U.3% Wt,
Aah-Ojt Wt).
t applicable or not ins[
ull cone, free flow nozi
e Pog 3T-32 ror aoules
Solids Deposits
7 Pt^ deposit at elbow on
bottom or duct.
1 inch solids on west wall
le beneath Koch tray. Botto
or Koch tray was clean ere
for 2 ft* in SW corner.
Top cooling spray nosile
waa plugged.
Negligible
Carbon deposit In No. 3
burner. Light solids in
duct sbove reheater.
negligible
*
cted.
es, Bo. 1969
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Time
rirst noticed
negligible
Two grid aectlons were replaced because or broken wires.
i Several other sections eontsined loose and bent wires.
Pt
Cooling spray nosilea (8T-32 rCN) are eroded but still in
good operating condition.
Continued corrosion of vanes (particularly topatoat vanes).
93 sleeve is defomlng on northeast side. Eight cracks at
section joints of aleeve -onlf 3 over 6 Inchesiseveral
I/It inch wide vertical cracks In refractory.
negligible
114 of spheres of bottoa two beds were punctured or dimpled.
All of high density polyethylene spheres In top bed (milky
white) were in good condition after 1*93 hours. O-203
yaag shaft ileeve was grooved and required replacement.
C-16
-------
Table C-24
Run No.
515-2A
On Stream 571 Hours
Operating Dote August 16 thru September 10, 1973
Component
Gia Inlet Duct
TCA Scrubber
Scattered
Nozzles
U) Spray
(2) Cooling
Chevron St&ln-
less Steel
Demi ate r
(1) Spraco fu
(2) Three, Be
Component
Reheater
ID Pan
Miscellaneous
Seal*
negligible
New .168" scale unlf on-
ly covered the walls
beneath bottom bed. Ken
scale between bottom be
and Koch tray avg. .062
Inch. 2-3 Inch stalac-
tite acale on bottom
grid. Scattered non-unl
form scale-solids of 1
Inch max. depth. (F»r--
tlculsrly OB west side]
Negligible
filial of gas flow area
at bottom two vmnes wac
blocked by scale and
solids.
feall scale
strip about three IndK
wide above demlster.
(S03-80.3* wt., 80,-
1.91 wt., Ash-17.8f wt)
1 cone, free flow nozili
e rog 8T-32 PCS nomzloe
Scale
*
*
•
Solids Deposits
Solids on TE-2007; remainder of
solids In -gas duct Inlet vflC ne-
gligible.
1
Top and south cooling apray noz-
zles were plugged. TSiree slurry
sprey nozzles were partially
plugged.
s, Ho. 1969.
Solids Deposits
l/li and 1/8 inch solids In gas
duct entering tad leaving re-
heater, respectively.
Ron-uniform 3 Inch deep (max. )
solids on bottom of dampers. 5
mil dry dust on back of blades.
*
Deterioration During Test Run Or At Time
First noticed
negligible
1-6 In.' and 2-U In.2 holes In wire grid sections of
third grid. Spheres from top bed had fallen Into
middle bed. Second grid had two lineal Inches of wi«e
missing. Four of five steam sparge trench headers
and main head flange wen Loose.
Erosive grooves In alurry spray nozzle throats were
«1 Inch deep (max.); nozzle e were otherwise In good
condition.
Negligible
Deterioration Daring Teat Run Or At Tine
First noticed
Stainless steel sleen was distorted; new eleeve
will be installed. 1/U Inch vertical oracki in
refractory.
negligible
G-201 pump Impeller and inner oaflifig WCTI eroded
and pitted to various depths of .200, .279, .300
Inches at Impeller rim, hub aid at suction inlet
respectively. G-206 pump inner casing wai loose.
0-203 aid 0-20$ pinnj sleeves grooved.
•Denotes not applicable or not Inspected.
C-17
-------
Table C-25
Bun go. 501-3* (Depletion Hia««)
stream Hour*
3"t Eovuri
Operating Datea 3/W73 - 3/15/73
Component
lea Inlet
)uct
eurole Bad
Icrubberl
rom.lBS f .
Slurry (1A
Cooling -;
Sievron 88
Knitter
teOMter
:D ran
Uacellaneoua
> Denotes no
1) Bottom nee
Top Headez
?) Bete Foe £
Seal*
Hegliglble
5 •!! scale oo Blurry
piping and valla.
(7
Cooling1 z>
Chevron 83
De mister
Reheater
CD ran
Uacellaneoiu
^ Denotes no
1) Bottom Hes
Top Headei
2) Bete Fog E
Scale
»
Bottom slurry headers a
Inch acale - solids (A
so2 - 11.1* wt).
Bottom slurry spray no
acale - solids (Asn - (
S02 - 11.1* Wt).
Hegllglble
Negligible
*
*
: applicable or not Inspi
ler - CE new Ijnproved no
- CE new improved nozzl
T-20FCH nozzles (Four).
Sollda Deposit!
1 ft3 of lolida on north
aide.
id noziles covered vlth 3/8
1-60.1* Wt, 803 - 22.7* Wt.
Eles cowred «ltb 3/8 Incb
).l* Wt, 803 - 22.it Wt,
1/8 Inch (lurry deposit on
bottom vanet. LKht dust
covering on top vuaa.
O - 1/U Inch dry lolida in
outlet duct above rehsater
Light solids coating.
*
eted.
zles.
s.
Deterioration During Test Bun Or At Tlaa
Wrst noticed
legliglble
BegllglbLe
The cooling apny header and three of four spray oosilas
were obstructed by iaaill plscea of «ood and scale. Tiro
of the bottosi slurry noules w«ra plugged.
Hegllglble
negligible
Tvo of eight fan bladea vere aignlflcantly warped.
blade had a sudaum dsronmtion of O.Jo Inches from
•tralght Una pattern.
On*
a
*
C-18
-------
Table C-27
Run Ho.
501-3B
On Stream Hours
gJHour. Operating Date. 3/30/73 - 3/31/73
Component
0«s Inlet
Duct
(tortile Bed
Scrubber
Monies , .
Blurry^'
Cooling* z>
Chevron 88
Demlater
Reheater
10 ran
Mlacellaneoui
* Denotea no
(1) Bottom He«
Top lieader
'Si Bete Foe E
Scale
*
10 nil acale on valla ,
Blurry headera, and
slurry notilea (SO, -
60. OJ Wt, 80, - 2"tT3<
Wt, Aah - ?.» Wt).
10 mil acale on the to;
and bottom outer aurfa<
of tbe slurry headera.
1/10 Inch solids-scale
(aee scale analysis ab(
solids on top vanes.
*
*
*
applicable or not Lnapi
ler - CE new Improved no:
- CE new Improved nozzl<
T-20FC1! nozzles (Four).
Bollda Deposits
Small solids deposits on
the north. ajid louth aides
«l/2 ft3).
Bagllglble
*
ee
accumulation on bottom vuea
ve). 1/16 Inch aoft flaky
«
Light Dust Coating.
*
cted.
zles.
s.
Deterioration During Test Boa Or At Tlsja
rirat Hotlc«d
•egllglble
negligible
•
negligible
as sleeve hxo defomed and distorted slightly but othenrlsie
In good condition.
Ho further deformation observed or neaiured.
•
Table C-28
Run Ho. 501-3B
, Stream Houri B* H°"' Operating Pate. V2/73 ' U/6/73
Cosponent
Oaa Inlet
Duct
Marble Bed
Scrubber
Rozilea , . v
Slurry (2)
Coollngu;
Chevron S3
De mister
Reh eater
ID Fan
Mlacellaneout
* Denotes ni
(1) Bottom Hei
l^p Heodei
(2) Bete FOR £
Scale
*
Negligible
•
1/16 Inch scale on top
vanes. (Ash - 5O.2* W
SO, - "A.!* Wt, 30, -
5.#Wt). Z
*
*
«
applicable or not Insp
er - Cf. new Improved no
- CE new Improved nozzl
-20FCK nozzles (Four).
Solids Deposits
1 ft3 (total) solids
deposit on north and south
side.
Negligible
*
negligible
Negligible
Thin duat coating.
*
cted.
zles.
8.
Deterioration During Test Run Or At TlSH
Tlrst noticed
negligible
negligible
*
negligible
S3 sleeve has varped and deformed to an elongated oval
shape. Refractory deterioration rate Increasing.
Presently has significant number and slie of cracks.
Negligible
*
C-19
-------
Table C-29
Run Ho. 501-3B
On Str
i Houri
390 Hours
Operating Dates V6/73 - Vag/73
Component
Oas Inlet
Duct
(tortile Bed
Scrubber
Houl.es / . x
Blurry ^L
Cooling1'1''
Chevron 88
Demleter
Reheater
ID Tan
Klacellaneous
* Denotes no
'!) Bottom Hea
Ttop Headei
<2) Bete Pog S
Scale
negligible
10 nil scale sfter 26
noun! 5 nil addltlooial
•eale after U73 noure.
Up to 1 Inch of acale-i
nozzles. (Aeh-l>l».U* Mt
Wt, CaO - 12.6)1 Wt).
Top bad 1/16 Inch nonui
oulation.
*
»
*
applicable or not InajM
er - CE new improved no:
- CE nev improved nozzl<
-2QFCN nozzles (Pour ).
Solids Deposits
2 tt* at Blurry-ash soft
solids on north and south
Bides.
PZ, 12 ft3 of scale-sollda
removed frost slurry piping?
nozzles, bottom of
bed and walla.
ilids on slurry piping tod
, S02 - U.7* Wt, 803 - 27.8)1
.form scale and solids accu-
Bottom covered vlth 1/8 ln<
slurry solids.
1/16 Inch of dry soot and
solids in duct above
reheater. Burners were
cleaned.
Thin soot and solids coatii
ted.
zles.
Deterioration During Test ROD Or At Tls»
First Botic«d
Negligible
29* of Ifcrble bet was plugged or In stratified patten
(initial plugging stage).
Ths swirl vanes in 13 of the 16 bottom slurry noBiles
have completely disappeared, toe regaining 3 vere only
remants of their original site Jl shmpe after 70t hours
operation. The 6. top nossles vere only lightly t.-Med.
negligible
Refractory continues to crack.
deform on north side,* currently
g. Jo further blade deformation.
88 sleere continues to
haa "teardrop" shape.
rroa random sables In the glass sphere bed, the average
sphere velght loss during this test was about 6%.
Table C-30
Run Bo. 502-3*
do Stream Hours
28? hours
Operating Dates U/83/73 - 5/7/73
Component
Oas Inlet
Duct
Marble Bed
Scrubber
•°"lel !1\
Blurry* 1'
Coollng(-)
Owrron 88
Dealster
Baheater
ID ran
Micellae eoui
* Oanot
Scale
Negligible
5 nil scale beneath bet
(not on walls) 10 mil
scale above bed on
piping walls, nozzles.
(80«-66.5f wt, C05-7.0
wt, 80 -2U.I1S wt, Aah-
6.6f wt).
5 •!! scale on nozzles
below bed, 10 mil seal
on nozzles above bed.
Bottom venes covered
with 10 mil scale.
Top vanes covered with
1/b solids and brovn
scale. (S0,-55.3t wt,
COe-lt.oi ^, 80-6.9*
wt, Ash-33.7t