Edison Water Quality Laboratory
December 1970   Vol. HI
    OIL  & HAZARDOUS  MATERIALS
          RESEARCH NEWSLETTER
        MARK YOUR CALENDARS!
        June l£ - 17, 1971 are the dates for the
        second conference on Prevention and
        Control of Oil Spill.

        The conference to be convened in
        Washington, B.C., will be jointly
        sponsored by FWQA., API and USCG.
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY • FEDERAL WATER QUALITY ADMINISTRATION

-------
EDISON BURNS!






In October 1970 the Oil and Hazardous Materials  Research




Section, as part of its in-house  activities,  conducted




field tests using various types of commercially  available




burning and/or wicking agents with several  different  types




of oils.  A final report on this  field  test,  as  well  as the




results of laboratory investigations, is  being prepared and




should be available shortly.  In  the meantime, however, a



summary of our findings is presented below:






     1.  Burning of free floating or uncontained oil




         slicks is extremely difficult  unless the




         thickness of oil is 2 mm or greater.






     2.  Adequate automated seeding methods for  both




         the powder and nodule-type burning agents are




         lacking.  Spreading of the burning agent  on




         the oil slick had to be  accomplished by hand.




         This conclusion was also reached by the Navy,




         which conducted burning  experiments in  May 1970.






     3.  Contained South Louisiana crude  oil was successfully




         burned — 80$ to 90$ reduction —  without the appli-




         cation of burning agents and/or  "priming" fuels.




         Bunker C could not be ignited  under these same




         conditions.

-------
Bunker C was successfully burned — Q0% to 90% reduction




when the slick was seeded with burning agents and an




appropriate priming fuel.  It was discovered the South




Louisiana crude oil performed better as a priming agent




than did gasoline or lighter fluid.






Use of magnesium type flares and gasoline torches to




ignite the burning-agent-treated slick proved un-




successful.  Success was achieved, however, using a




blow torch once we learned how to manipulate the torch




in such a manner that the torch gas pressure did not




push aside the oil and seed material so as to expose the




water surface.



-------
WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1970:  CHEMICAL  USE  POLICY






Pursuant to the provisions of  this Act, the President is authorized




to prepare and publish a national  oil  and hazardous materials




pollution contingency plan.  This  plan was  published in the




Federal Register, Vol. 35, No.  106 —  Tuesday, June 2, 1970.




Included was a schedule identifying dispersants and other chemicals




that may be used in carrying out the plan.  To summarize this




schedule:




     When Regional Response Team is activated;




     Dispersants may be used in any place,  at any time, and




     in quantities designated  by the On-Scene Commander, when




     their use will:




          1.  In the judgment  of the On-Scene Commander,




              prevent or substantially reduce hazard to




              human life or limb or substantial hazard




              of fire to property.




          2.  In the judgment  of FWQA, in consultation




              with appropriate  State agencies, prevent or




              reduce substantial hazard to  a major  segment




              of the population(s) of  vulnerable species




              of waterfowl.




          3.  In the judgment  of FWQA, in consultation




              with appropriate  State agencies, result




              in the least overall environmental damage,




              or interference  with designated uses.

-------
When Regional Response Team is NOT activated;




Provisions of the preceding section shall apply.  The use




of dispersants in any other situation shall be subject to




this schedule except in States where State laws, regulations




or written policies are in effect.






Interim restrictions on use of dispersants and sinking




agents for pollution control purposes:




Except as noted above, dispersants shall NOT be used:




     1.  On any distillate fuel




     2.  On any spill of oil less than 200 barrels




         in quantity.




     3.  On any shoreline.




     U.  In any waters less than 100 feet deep.




     5.  In any waters containing major population, or




         breeding or passage areas for species of fish or




         marine life which may be damaged or rendered




         commercially less marketable by exposure to




         dispersant or dispersed oil.




     6.  In any waters where winds and/or currents are




         of such velocity and direction that dispersed




         oil mixtures would likely, in the judgment of




         FWQA., be carried to shore areas within 2k hours.




     7.  In any waters where such use may affect surface




         water supplies.

-------
Sinking agents:




Sinking agents may be  used only in marine waters




exceeding 100 meters in depth where currents are not




predominately on-shore, and only if other control methods




are judged by FWQA. to  be  inadequate or not feasible.
    7 THOUGHT OIL CALMED TROUBLED  WATERS1

-------
PULVERIZED LIMESTONE USED  FOR BEACH CLEANING*


A method of cleaning oiled pebble beaches using waterproof

limestone dust has been described by J.J.D.  Greenwood,

H.A.P. Ingram, J. McManus and D.J.A. Williams of Dundee

University  ('Public Cleansing1 60(U):1?8,' 1970).   The  reported

advantages of the powder are that it is cheap,  non-toxic  and

precludes secondary pollution which may occur when dispersants

are used.


The powder in question is a preparation of pulverized  limestone

rendered hydrophobic by treatment with stearic  acid.   It  is not

easily removed by high tides, and is very easily adsorbed to oil,

forming a friable layer on rocks and pebbles  which drops  off and

is washed away as sandsize pellets — a process greatly facilitated

by abrasive wave action.


Greenwood et al. first tried out the powder at  the beginning of

March 1968 following a spill of topped Venezuelan crude oil

into the Tay estuary, Scotland.  In all,  l$,l;00 ibs. of the

dust obtained from a local limestone works were spread manually

over ?0,UOO square feet of beach at a cost of about $ll;2.80.

Two years later the rocks and pebbles were free of oil and there

were no gross signs of detrimental effect to  living organisms.

Regular checks had not, however, been made during the two years.
^Marine Pollution Bulletin,  Volume  1  (NS), Number 6, June 1970,
 pg. 82.

                              6

-------
Dr. J. McManus  has been investigating the effect of the

limestone dust  on  various types of rock contaminated with

crude oil to  determine the optimum conditions  for its

application.  He has found that pebbles presoaked in water

take up less  oil than do dry pebbles, and the  dust-oil coating

is more easily  removed.  He has also found  that  fresh acid igneous

rocks such as granite, quartzite, and flint are  more readily cleansed

than basic basalt  ones such as limestone and dolerite, though

why this should be is not immediately clear.  It is however, under-

standable that  porous, deeply weathered rocks  that have been oiled

are very difficult to clean.
       ftiom  1970
       A John Tickner cartoon, reprinted from The WAGS/ Magazine—
       published by The Wildfowlers' Association of Great Britain & Ireland.

-------
        NEW FWQA OIL POLLUTION PROJECTS

        Following is a list of grant and contract projects awarded by

        the Federal Water Quality Administration since May 1970:
Grantee or Contractor
     Subject
   Project Officer
Expected Completion Date
Atlantic Research Corporation
Missile Systems Division
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Battelle Memorial Institute
Pacific Northwest Laboratories
P.O. Box 999
Richland, Washington 99352
Consultec, Inc.
2351 Research Boulevard
Roclcville, Maryland 20850
JBF Scientific Corporation
Alpha Industrial Park
Chelmsford, Massachusetts 0182U
University of Miami
School of Marine and
 Atmospheric Sciences
10 Rickenbacker Causeway
Miami, Florida 331U9
Concept development
studies on a self
contained oil har-
vesting device
employing a series
of rotating disks.

Design fabrication
and full-scale testing
of an oil harvesting
system employing water
jet sweeps and floating,
skimming and primary
oil-water separation.

Concept development
studies on a device to
harvest oil slicks based
upon use of a water
permeable - oil imper-
meable filter bag.

Development and demonstra-
tion of a prototype scale
mechanical harvesting de-
vice based upon a submerged
hydrodynamic oil concen-
trator.

To measure comparative
acute toxicity and effective-
ness of four dispersants
according to procedures
supplied by FWQA.
       S.  T.  Uyeda
          10/70
       Paul C.  Walkup
          10/70
       R.  B.  Dayton
          11/70
     Ralph A.  Bianchi
           5/71
      Charles E.  Lane
          U/71

-------
Grantee or Contractor
     Subject
   Project Officer
Expected Completion Date
Microwave Sensor Systems
8050 E. Florence Avenue
Downey, California 902UO
To demonstrate the
application of micro-
wave radiometry to the
detection and measure-
ment of thickness of
oil slicks.
     J.  C.  Aukland
        6/71
New England Aquarium
Central Wharf
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
New Mexico State University
Physical Science Laboratory-
Box 35U8
Las Cruces, New Mexico 88001
To measure comparative
acute toxicity and
effectiveness of four
dispersants according
to procedures supplied
by FWQA.

Develop and demonstrate
at scale a mechanical
oil recovery device
which employs a combi-
nation of the principles,
gravity weir, perferential
wetting on a rotating belt
and vacuum suction.
     S. Fai Cheuk
         U/71
     J. R. Gleyre
         5/71
Fire Department, City
 of New York
Municipal Building
New York, New York 10007
Pacific Engineering Laboratory
6^7 Howard Street
San Francisco, California
Rex Chainbelt, Inc.
h701 West Greenfield Avenue
West Milwaukee, Wisconsin
                    5321U
Demonstrate a comprehen-
sive oil spill control
program for New York
harbor and immediate
waters.

To measure comparative
acute toxicity and
effectiveness of four
dispersants according
to procedures supplied
by FWQA.

Develop fundamental design
criteria for a belt-type
oil harvesting device;
build and test a prototype
devic e.
     Joseph F. Connor
        6/30/71
     Robert A.
         U/71
Ryder
       John Pernusch
          12/70

-------
Grantee or Contractor
     Subject
   Project  Officer
Expected Completion Date
Sonics International, Inc,
7101 Carpenter Freeway
Dallas, Texas 752U7
Syracuse University
 Research Corporation
Life Sciences Division
Syracuse, New York 13210
To demonstrate and
evaluate the use,
effectiveness, and
cost of a device
utilizing the ultra-
sonic energy con-
cept to clean oil
contaminated beach
sands.

To measure comparative
acute toxicity and
effectiveness of four
dispersants according
to procedures supplied
by FWQA..
       Byron Dunn
         9/7/70
   Richard B.
        U/71
Moore
For further information on individual  projects,  please contact the Oil

and Hazardous Materials Research  Section,  Edison Water Quality Laboratory,

Federal Water Quality Administration,  Edison,  New  Jersey 08817
                        "/ say if the good Lord wanted us to fly, He  LOOI< '
                           wouldn't have invented oil slick."
                                      10

-------
OIL  POLLUTION: ESTIMATED AMOUNTS  AND  SOURCES


Used oil from vehicles may be the largest single  source  of

oil pollution, including oil pollution of the  oceans.  This

is one of the tentative conclusions reached  by a Massachusetts

Institute of Technology sponsored study group.


A summary of their major findings, including an estimate of  the

quantities and types of oil discharged to the  world's  waters

is as follows:
     a.  "It is likely that up to l.J? million tons of
          oil are introduced into the oceans every year
          through ocean shipping, offshore drilling,
          and accidents.  In addition, as much as two
          to three times this amount could eventually
          be introduced into waterways and eventually
          the oceans as a result of emission and
          wasteful practices on land.

     b.   Very little is known about the effects of
          oil in the oceans on marine life.   Present
          results are conflicting.  The effects of
          one oil spill which have been carefully
          observed indicate severe damage to marine
          organisms.  Observations of other spills
          have not shown such a marked degree of
          damage.  Different kinds of damage have
          been observed for different spills.

     c.   Potential effects include:  direct kill
          of organisms through coating, asphyxiation,
          or contact poisoning; direct kill through
          exposure to the water soluble toxic com-
          ponents of oil; destruction of the food
          sources of organisms; incorporation of
          sub-lethal amounts of oil and oil products
          into organisms, resulting in reduced re-
          sistance to infection and other stresses,
          or in reproductive successes."
                              11

-------
                            ESTIMATES OF OIL INTRODUCED
                    INTO WORLD'S WATERS AND POTENTIAL LOSSES TO
                                  WATERS, 1969

                               Metric Tons Per Year
1.
    Tankers
     (normal operations)
    Using control measures
     (80*)
    Not using control
     measures
2.  Other ships
     (bilges, etc.)

3.  Offshore production
     (normal operations)

U.  Accidental spills
     Ships
     Nonships

5.  Refineries and
     petrochemical

          SUBTOTAL

6.  Potential losses to
     water from industrial
     and automotive (not
     fuel):
    Highway vehicle spent oils
    Industrial plus all other
     vehicles

          SUBTOTAL
                                            300,000
                                         1,800,000

                                         1,500,000
                                                     1,630,000
                                                                   % of
                                                                  Total
30,000
£00,000





530,000
500,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
10.7
10.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
 6.0
36.6

30.6
                                                     3,300,000
          TOTAL
                                                     h,930,000
   NOTE:  Oil from pleasure craft and natural  seeps
           not included.
                                    12

-------
 CLEANING OILED SEABIRDS WITH  LARODAN*


 Kare Larsson,  Institute of Medical Biochemistry,  and  Goran Odham,

 Institute of Plant Physiology, University of  Goteborg, Gotegor,

 Sweden, have successfully used Larodan for cleaning oiled seabirds.

 Reportedly, with this cleaning agent,  waxing  takes place during

 cleaning (a method similar to that sometimes  used in  car cleaning)

 of the oiled bird.


 When detergents are used for washing oiled seabirds the natural

 feather wax is often removed because the  solubility and emulsifying

 properties of the feather wax and the  contaminating oil are almost

 identical.  Because of the importance  of  wax  in maintaining water

 repellancy and heat insulation,  no seabird can be returned to

 its natural environment until the wax  has been replaced in one

 way or another.


 The preen gland produces about Iarine Pollution Bulletin,  Volume 1 (NS),  Number 8, August  1970,
 pg. 123 - 12U.
                               13

-------
wax after cleaning.  Initially, about 150 oiled common swans in




Goteborg were cleaned with Tremalon B, and wax subsequently



sprayed on the plumage.  In practice, the spraying technique




was not very satisfactory; overdoses were often given resulting



in plumage with the same properties as the original oiled



plumage.






To overcome this problem Larodan 12? was used.  The preparation



consisted of a dispersion of hydrophilic lipid crystals in water,



with a commercially available synethetic wax  'pur-cellin liquid'



(composition similar to that of natural feather wax) included in



the hydrophobia regions of the lipid crystal matrix.  The hydro-



philic lipid is the 1-monoglyceride of dodecanoic acid (chain



length 12), and the synthetic wax contains a methyl-branched C^-acid



linked to n-octadecanyl -1.  The wax is a common component of



cosmetic preparations.  (Larodan 12? refers to these chain lengths.)



The proportions of the three components, monoglyceride, wax and water,



were adjusted on the basis of practical tests so that the final pro-



duct consisted of 20 per cent monoglyceride and 2 per cent wax in



water.  Larodan thus consists of two lipid components of the same



type as those occurring naturally in seabirds.  The crystalline



monoglyceride dispersions in water have been extensively tested



externally in man, and both internally and externally in test animals.






Larodan 12? has been tested on about ten Peiping ducks contaminated



with Shell talpa oil 30 to which carbon powder had been added.



About 100 g of contaminant was used on each bird, and after 3 days





                                11*

-------
they were washed with Larodan.   Only one washing was  required to




remove the oil, and  after 8-10 days the birds could swim.




Comparisons  of Larodan with other agents showed that  with the




latter the washing procedure was longer, and the birds took




longer to float.






Larodan has  been used on a large scale in Scandinavia; for example




in Gavle, Sweden,  where about seventy-five birds belonging to the




family Anatidae were successfully cleaned and returned to their




natural environment  within two weeks.
               -The Post & Times-Stir  Cincinnati, Wed., March 25, 1970





             Till IT LIKI IT IS               IT DUNAOIN
              'WHY DON'T YOU SWITCH  TO A DETERGENT OIL?'

-------
NEW R&D NEED; POWER  BRAKES FOR  TANKERS!


The stopping ability of tankers, even under crash stop

conditions — vessel in full reverse — is causing con-

cern in naval circles.  Causing the worry is a fleet

of 326,000 ton, Universe class tankers built in Japan and

under charter to a major U.S. oil company.  These tankers

are almost three times the capacity of the ill-fated

Torrey Canyon.


In the September issue of the U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings

Capt. Edward F. Oliver, USCG, ret., reported that:
          "The most important factor in connection
          with collision and stranding — the two
          most dreaded casualties — is the 'crash
          stop1 ability.  Unfortunately, the ability
          of the tankers to come to a 'Crash stop'
          has decreased as their size has increased.

          For the U00,000 tonner, the straight-line
          stopping distance for a 'crash stop1
          would be four to five miles and would
          take approximately 30 minutes.  During
          this period of backing full, the ship's
          master is unable to steer her or regulate
          the speed.

          If the engines are not put 'full astern'
          but on 'stop' it takes up to one hour for
          the Universe Ireland to come to a stop."
              ^5 minutes
        17,000 tons    1/5 mile
       dfc    I   m    21 minutes
         200,000 tons        2.5 miles
                               30 minute*
 400,000 tons
k	L
 1,000,000 tons
                                 4.5 miles
                               16

-------
OIL  POLLUTION TRAINING COURSE






A three day training course  on oil  pollution control technology will




be presented at the  Edison Water  Quality Laboratory during the week




of February 1,  1971.  Topics to be  discussed at this course will



include, but are not necessarily  limited to, oil slick




characteristics, sampling, analysis,  environmental effects, booms,




skimmers, contingency planning, and practical problem solutions.




Course will entail not only  classroom work, but actual "get the




hands dirty" laboratory participation.






Course registration  will be  limited,  therefore, for reservations




or information contact Mr. J. McKenna, Training Officer, Edison




Water Quality Laboratory,  FWQA, Edison, New Jersey 0881?.




(FTS No. 201 8U6-U6U7, Commercial No. 201 5U8-33U7).
                             17

-------
WASHINGTON-EDISON PERSONNEL CHANGES






Since the last issue of the Newsletter,  several personnel changes




have taken place, both at Edison and at Headquarters.   In



Washington, RALPH RHODES, former Chief,  Oil Pollution  Research



Section, has transferred to the FWQA.'s Charlottesville, Virginia o



office.  KURT JAKOBSON, previously with the Division of Technical



Support, Washington, D.C., is now handling Ralph's  responsibilities,






At Edison, both DR. THOMAS MURPHY,  Chief,  Oil  and Hazardous



Materials Research Section and PATRICK TQBIN,  Sanitary Engineer,



have been promoted to "greener pastures" in Washington.



Dr. Murphy is now a staff assistant to Dr.  David Stephan,



Assistant Commissioner, Research and Development.   Pat is still



involved in research activities, however,  in our sister division



of Process Research and Development.






New additions at Edison include J.  STEPHEN DORRLER, formerly in



charge of the Navy's oil pollution  program at  Norfolk, Virginia,



who will be takning on many of Tom  Murphy's old responsibilities.



DR. JOSEPH LAFORNARA, a recent graduate  of the  University of



Florida, is devoting all of his time  to develop new methods and



procedures for analyzing oil spill  samples.  IRA WILDER, pre-



viously with the Navy's Applied Science Research Laboratory is



handling the hazardous materials program.   ARNOLD FRIEBERGER,



also formerly with the Naval Applied  Science Research  Laboratory,



is involved in grant and contract management,  as well  as in-house



activities.




                              18

-------
CLEANING OIL CONTAMINATED BEACHES


Dr. A. Y. McClean, a member of "Project Oil",  the  Canadian  Government's

response team for the Tanker ARROW disaster which  occurred  in

Chedabucto Bay, Nova Scotia on February k,  1970, reports  that  a

chemical dispersant was successfully used,  without any  adverse

biological effects, to remove Bunker C  oil  from rocky shorelines.


The test results indicated that an application of  0.1 gal/ft^  would

be effective in cleansing the Bunker C  oil  from the rocky shoreline.

Based on a price of $2.97 per gallon, the cost for cleaning the  rocky

beach would be $0.30 per square foot.  This cost would  vary considerably

depending on the nature of the shore and degree of oiling.   In these

tests, as the shore was rocky, and the  oiling  quite heavy,  the product

cost was probably above average.  The cost  of  cleaning  bedrock,  for

instance, would be less.


Dr. McClean concluded that the use of BP 1100  B, or a similar  dispersant,

is a convenient and effective way of cleaning  rocky shorelines contami-

nated with Bunker C oil, although 100$ removal of  the oil is not possible

in instances where the oil has flowed underneath rocky  surfaces.


In addition, he indicated that undesirable  biological side  effects can

probably be reduced to negligible proportions  provided:

     (a)  The dispersant-treated oil is hosed  off  into  the  sea
          with large quantities of water.

     (b)  The cleaning operation is carried out during  a  rising
          tide, and wind and current conditions are such  that
          the emulsified material is quickly diluted and  dispersed,
          and

     (c)  The cleaning operation is not carried out on  such a  large
          scale that extremely large quantities of emulsified  oil
          are dumped into the sea in a short period of  time.

                                 19

-------
DISPERSANT  USE  RESULTS IN $500 FINE





As a result of expert testimony provided by  the Edison Water



Quality Laboratory in U.S.  District  Court, Southern District



of New York, a New York City oil  storage firm was fined $500



for an oil spill and an additional $500 for  using dispersant.



Testimony was directed to the toxicity and potential harmful



effects to the marine environment that could result from



the dispersant use.






The incident involved a spill of  50  - 150 gallons of #1; heating



oil into Westchester Creeks as a  result of the failure of an



automatic control alarm on  a storage tank.   Sixty gallons of



dispersant were used without notification of or approval by



FWQA.





The case, prosecuted under  the Refuse Act, U.S. Code Title 33,



Section U07, was precedent  setting in that this was the first



time a violator was successfully  prosecuted  under the Refuse Act



for using dispersant.
                              20

-------
UPDATING OF TECHNICAL  RAD MANUALS






The Newsletter will be  used as  the mechanism for updating




Edison's R&D manuals on "Oil  Skimming Devices" and "Oil




Containment Systems".   When appropriate, other past and




future reports will also be brought up to date in this




manner.  For your convenience,  the pages have not been




bound into the Newsletter,  but  rather "T-slotted" so that




they can be easily removed  and  inserted into the appro-




priate R&D report.






Included with this issue of the Newsletter is a new




addition to the report  on "Oil  Skimming Devices":






              Reynold's Medusa  Skimmers






It is important to emphasize  that mention of trade names




or commercial products  does not constitute FWQA. endoresement




or recommendations for  use.
                             21

-------