U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Legislation
Division of Intergovernmental Relations
Washington, D.C. 20460
-------
PREFACE
This report has been prepared to provide a nationaj. summary
on the status of State air pollution control efforts in terms of
organization, programs, and operations. It is a companion to the
FY 1972 Digest of State Programs for water pollution control and
is being published for the first time in response to requests
from governmental agencies and others interested in the activities
and progress of State air pollution control programs.
The information contained herein was obtained from State
Implementation Plans for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards and from surveys and reports prepared by the Office of
Air Programs, the former Office of Intergovernmental Programs and
the regional offices of the Environmental Protection Agency. Upon
completion of the report, draft copies were distributed to the
regional offices and to concerned units of OAP for review and
general comment. As a result, adjustments were made in the
reported data and suggestions for improving the report have
been incorporated.
In some instances difficulties were experienced in obtaining
and presenting various kinds of information due to the scarcity
of existing data for certain areas, differences in baseline
reference points and changing program requirements. Adjustments
have been made to insure that summaries reflect the latest avail-
able information and data for each period covered and estimates,
projections or limitations have been footnoted or explained in
the accompanying narrative.
Further details or additional information concerning a specific
State program, can be obtained by contacting the appropriate
Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office listed in
Appendix F.
Your comments and suggestions concerning the format, scope and
information presented in this FY 1972 Digest of State Air Programs
are invited.
Jfi, /
Nicholas M. Golubin
Assistant Directo
Division of Intergovernmental Relations
Office of Legislation
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Glossary 1
I. ORGANIZATION
A. State Administrators 3
B. State Agency Configurations 8
C. State Boards § Commissions 9
D. Air Quality Control Regions 10
E. Map of Air Quality Control Regions 12
F. Significant EPA Actions , 14
II. PROGRAMS
A. Legal Authority Needed 17
B. Funding 19
1. By State .20
C. Staffing 24
1. By State 25
2. By Occupational Category 29
3. Reasons for Vacancies 30
4. State Assignees 31
D. Salaries 36
1. Range by State 37
2. Range by Occupation 40
3. Mean Range 41
E. Rank by Population; Staff; State Funds; Local
Funds; Total Funds 42
III. OPERATIONS
A. Percent of Effort by Function 44
B. Attendance at Training Courses 45
C. Training by Profession 46
D. Major Sources of Pollution 48
E. Air Quality Surveillance 51
1. Required and Existing Equipment 52
2. Cost of Needed Equipment 54
F. Status of Implementation Plans 55
G. Priority I Air Quality Control Regions 59
1. Number S, Population by State 60
2. Percent of Population by State 61
H. Calculated Estimates of Emissions for
Selected Pollutants 62
I. Tax Incentives for Industries 65
J. Transportation Controls 67
K. Requests for Assistance 71
Appendix 77
Figure II-B1 - Funding (History Chart) 22
Figure II-B2 - Federally Supported Agencies 23
-------
Abbreviations Used in this Publication
AQCR - Air Quality Control Region
CO - Carbon Monoxide
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency
GS - General Schedule
HC - Hydrocarbon
N0£ - Nitrogen Dioxide
NOX - Nitrogen Oxide
Ox - Oxident
Part. - Particulate
Pop. - Population
R.O. - Regional Office
SIP - State Implementation Plan
S02 - Sulfur Dioxide
SOx - Sulfur Oxide
-------
Section I
ORGANIZATION
A single agency is designated in all 50 States,
the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, and American Samoa, to administer
Air Quality Control Programs. In addition 242 local
programs are operating in 38 States. Of the 55 State
agencies 13 are EPA Type; agencies combining air, water
and possibly other environmental protection programs,
but not exercising significant natural resource management
or traditional medical health protection functions. Six^
teen are Other Type; agencies combining pollution
control functions with significant natural resources
management functions or those agencies specializing
predominantly in the control of air pollution. Twenty-
five are Health Type; agencies combining air pollution
control functions and possibly other environmental
protection programs, with traditional medical health
protection functions.
Twenty-two State agencies operate under the aegis
of or in connection with a Commission, and twenty-one
with a board. Eleven utilize a council or other type of
authority and four have none of the above. These Boards
and/or Commissions may operate the control agency,
exercise regulatory authority or serve in an advisory
capacity.
In addition, States are divided into a total of
247 Federally designated air quality control regions
for the purpose of carrying out the requirements of the
Clean Air Act. The number of regions within each State
varies from one to fourteen depending on the size of
the State and the complexity of the air pollution problem.
There are 128 intrastate and 119 interstate Air Quality
Control Regions. A map showing the boundaries of these
regions is provided in Section I.E. A list of some of the
more significant EPA actions required over the next few years
to meet the goals and objectives of the Clean Air Act appear
in Section I.F. These actions have considerable impact on
the operation and resource requirements of State agencies
which are responsible for the control of air pollution in
each of the various AQCR's within their jurisdiction.
-------
I. A.
STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATORS
Alabama
W.T. Willis, Director
Division of Air Pollution Control
Department of Public Health
State Office Building
Montgomery, AL 36104
PHONE: 205-269-7841
Alaska
James A. Anderegg, Director
Division of Air § Water Quality Control
Department of Environmental Conservation
Pouch 0
Juneau, AK 99801
PHONE: 907-586-6721
Arizona
Norman E. Schell, Director
Air Pollution Control Division
4019 North 33rd Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85017
PHONE: 602-271-5306
Arkansas
Jarrell Southall, Chief
Air Section, State of Arkansas
Department of Pollution Control
and Ecology
8001 National Drive
Little Rock, AR 72209
PHONE: 501-371-1136
California
John A. Maga, Executive Officer
Air Resources Board
1025 "P" Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
PHONE: 916-445-1511
Colorado
Dr. Gerald P. Wood, Director
Air Pollution Control Division
Department of Health
4210 East llth Avenue
Denver, CO 80220
PHONE: 303-388-6111
Connecticut
Echert Beck
Director of Air Compliance
Department of Environmental Protection
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CN 06115
PHONE: 203-566-4030
Delaware
Robert R. French, Mgr. Air Resources Sec,
Division of Environmental Control
Department of Natural Resources
and Enviornmental Control
Dover, DE 19901
PHONE: 302-678-4791
Dist. of Columbia
John V. Brink, Chief
Bureau of Air § Water Pollution Control
Dept. of Environmental Services
Washington, D.C. 20002
PHONE: 202-629-3748
Florida
Vincent D. Patton, Exec. Director
Department of Pollution Control
315 South Calhoun Street, Suite 300
Tallahassee, FL 32304
PHONE: 904-224-9151
Georgia
Robert H. Collom, Jr., Director
Air Quality Control Branch
Environmental Protection Division
Deaprtment of Natural Resources
47 Trinity Avenue, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303
PHONE: 404-656-4867
Hawaii
Robert S. Nekomoto, Chief
Air Sanitation Branch
Division of Environmental Health
Honolulu, HI 96801
PHONE: 808-548-6355
-------
Idaho
Alfred J. Eiguren, Director
Air Pollution Control Commission
Idaho Department of Health
Statehouse
Boise, ID 83707
PHONE: 208-384-2390
Illinois
Dr. John J. Roberts, Manager
Division of Air Pollution Control
Environmental Protection Agency
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, IL 62706
PHONE: 217-525-3397
Indiana
Harry D. Williams, Director
Division of Air Pollution Control
State Board of Health
1330 West Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46206
PHONE: 317-633-4273
Iowa
Dr. C. L. Campbell, Director
Air Pollution Control Division
Environmental Engineering Service
Department of Health
Lucas State Office Building
Des Moines, IW 50319
PHONE: 515-281-5345
Kansas
Melville W. Gray, Ch. Eng. § Dir.
Division of Environmental Health
State Department of Health
State Office Building
Topeka, KS 66612
PHONE: 913-296-3896
Kentucky
Frank P. Partee, Technical Dir.
Air Pollution Control Commission
275 East Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40601
PHONE: 502-564-3382
Louisiana
John E. Trygg, Technical Secretary
Louisiana Air Control Commission
State Department of Health
P.O. Box 60630
New Orleans. LA 70160
PHONE: 504-527-5115
Maine
William R. Adams, Jr., Commissioner_
Department of Environmental Protection
State House
Augusta, ME 04330
PHONE: 207-289-2811
Maryland
Jean J. Schueneman, Director
Bureau of Air Quality Control
Environ. Health Admn., Dept. of Health
§ Mental Hygiene.
601 N. Howard Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
PHONE: 301-383-2779
Massachusetts
Gilbert Joly, Director
Bureau of Air Use Management
Department of Public Health
600 Washington Street
Boston, MA 02111
PHONE: 617-727-2658
Michigan
Lee E. Jager, Chief
Air Pollution Control Section
Department of Public Health
3500 North Logan Street
Lansing, MI 48906
PHONE: 517-373-1410
Minneosta
Edward M. Wiik, Director
Division of Air Quality
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
717 Delaware Street, S.E.
Minneapolis, MM 55440
PHONE: 612-378-1320
-------
Mississippi
New Jersey
Jack Curryy chief
Division of Air Pollution
Air § Water Pollution Control Comm.
P.O. Box 827
Jackson, MS 39205
PHONE: 601-354-6783
Missouri
Harvey D. Shell, Actg. Exec. Secy.
Air Conservation Commission
P.O. Box 1062
Jefferson City, MO 65101
PHONE: 314-635-9145
Montana
Donald R. Holtz, Director
Division of Air Pollution Control
State Department of Health
Cogswell Building
Helena, MT 59601
PHONE: 406-449-3454
Nebraska
James L. Higgins, Director
Department of Environmental Control
P.O. Box 25653
State House Station
Lincoln, NB 68509
PHONE: 402-471-2186
Nevada
Dick Serdoz,Air Quality Officer
Bureau of Environmental Health
Ny Building
201 S. Fall Street
Carson City, NV 89701
PHONE: 702-882-7870
New Hampshire
Forrest H. Bumford, Director
Air Pollution Control Agency
61 South Spring
Concord, NH 03301
PHONE: 603-271-2281
Willaim A. Munroe, Chief
Bureau of Air Pollution Control
Department of Environmental Protection
P.O. Box 1390
Trenton, NJ 08625
PHONE: 609-292-5450
New Mexico
Aaron Bond. Chief
Occ. Health, Rad. Health, § Air Quality
Section
Environmental Improvement Agency
PERA Building
College and West Manhattan
Santa Fe, NM 87501
PHONE: 505-827-2813
New York
Alexander Rihm, Jr., Director
Air Pollution Control Program
Dept. of Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12201
PHONE: 518-457-7231
North Carolina
W. E. Knight, Chief, Air Qual. Div.
Office of Water S, Air Programs
Department of Natural § Eco. Resources
P.O. Box 27048
Raleigh, NC 27611
PHONE: 919-829-3006
North Dakota
<'
Gene Christiansen, Director
Division of Environmental Health
and Engineering Services
Department of Health
State Capitol
Bismarck, ND 58501
PHONE: 701-224-2371
Ohio
Jack Wunderie, Eng. in Charge
Air Pollution Unit - Dept. of Health
450 E. Town Street
Columbus, OH 43216
PHONE: 614-469-2390
-------
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Robert V. Blanche, Director
Air Pollution Control Division
Department of Health
3400 North Eastern Avenue
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
PHONE: 405-427-6561
Oregon
H. M. Patterson, Director
Air Quality Control Division
Dept. of Environmental Quality
1234 S.W. Morrison Street
Portland, OR 97205
PHONE: 503-229-5267
Pennsylvania
Victor H. Sussman, Director
Bureau of Air Quality
and Noise Control
Dept. of Enviornmental Resources
P.O. Box 2351
Harrisburg, PA 17120
PHONE: 717-787-6838
Puerto Rico
Lorenzo R. Inglesias, Chief
Air Pollution Control Program
Environmetnal Quality Board
P.O. Box 11785
San Juan, PR 00910
PHONE: 809-725-5140
Rhode Island
Austin C. Daley, Chief
Division of Air Pollution Control
204 Health Bldg; Davis Street
Providence, RI 02903
PHONE: 401-277-2808
W. G. Crosby, Chief
Division of Air Pollution Control
S.C. Pollution Control Authority
P.O. Box 11628
Columbia, SC 29201
PHONE: 803-758-2966
South Dakota
Charles E. Carl, Secy $ Exec. Officer
Division of Sanitary Engineering
and Environmental Protection
Department of Health
Office Building #2
Pierre, SD 57501
PHONE: 605-224-3351
Tennessee
Harold E. Hodges, Director
Division of Air Pollution Control
Department of Public Health
Cordell Hull Building C2-212
Nashville, TN 37219
PHONE: 615-741-3931
Texas
Charles R. Barden, Executive Secretary
Texas Air Control Board
820 E. 53rd STreet
Austin, TX 78751
PHONE: 512-454-3781
Utah
Grant S. Winn, Ph.D., CHief
Air Quality Section
State Division of Health
44 Medical Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84113
PHONE: 801-328-6121
-------
Vermont
Wisconsin
Richard Valentinetti
Air Pollution Control Officer
Agency of Environmental Conservation
Montpelier, VT 05692
PHONE: 802-223-2311
Virginia
William R. Meyer, Exec. Director
State Air Pollution Control Board
Ninth St. State Office Bldg., Rm 1106
Richmond, VA 23219
PHONE: 703-770-2378
Virgin Islands
Donald Francois, Asst. Director
Division of Environmental Health
Department of Health
P.O. Box 1442
St. Thomas, VI 00801
PHONE: 809-774-3411
Washington
John A. Biggs, Director
Department of Ecology
Olympia, WA 98504
PHONE: 206-753-2241
West Virginia
Carl G. Beard, II, Director
Air Pollution Control Commission
1558 Washington Street, East
Charleston, W 25311
PHONE: 304-348-3286
Guam
0. V. Natarajan, Ph.D., Administrator
Guam Air Pollution Control Commission
P.O. Box 2999
Agana, GU 96910
PHONE: Overseas 746-9138
Douglas W. Evans, Chief
Air Pollution Control Section
Bureau of Air Pollution Control
and Solid Waste Disposal
4610 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53705
PHONE: 608-266-0924
Wyoming
Robert E. .Sudin , Director
Industrial Hygiene Services
Department of Health
and Social Services
State Office Building
Cheyenne, WY 82001
PHONE: 307-777-7511
American Samoa
Lt. Gov. Frank Mockler, Chairman
Amer. Samoa Environmental
Quality Commission
Office of the Governor
Pago Pago, AS 96920
PHONE: Overseas 32131
-------
I. B.
STATE AGENCY CONFIGURATIONS
TYPE OF AGENCY
CD HEALTH
EZB OTHER
00
/..'////£,£» New YorK
EPA REGIONAL OFFICES
-------
I.C. STATE BOARDS AND/OR COMMISSIONS
STATE BOARD COMMISSION OTHER
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawa i i
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mai ne
Maryland
Mass.
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hamp.
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Va.
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Amer. Samoa
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Air Pollution Control Commission
Environmental Advisory Board
Board of Health/Air Poll. Control Hearing Board
Pollution Control Commission
Air Resources Board
Air Pollution Control Commission
Water & Air Resources Commission
Air & Water Pollution Control Board
Fish & Game Commission
Board of Health
Air Pollution Control Commission
Pollution Control Board
Air Pollution Control Board
Air Pollution Control Commission
Board of Health
Air Pollution Control Commission
Air Control Commission
Environmental Improvement Commission
Air Quality Control Advisory Board
Public Health Council
Air Pollution Control Commission
Air & Water Pollution Control Commission
Air Conservation Commission
Board of Health/Air Poll. Control Advisory Council
Environmental Control Council
Commission of Environmental Protection
Air Pollution Control Commission
Clean Air Council
Environmental Improvement Board
Environmental Board/Council of Environmental Advisors
Board of Water & Air Resources
Air Pollution Control Advisory Council
Board of Health/Air Pollution Control Board
Board of Health/Air Pollution Council
Environmental Quality Commission
Environmental Quality Board
Board of Health
Pollution Control Authority
Air Pollution Control Commission
Air Pollution Control Board
Air Control Board
Air Conservation Committee
Air Pollution Control Board
Ecological Commission
Air Pollution Control Commission
Air Pollution Advisory Council
Air Resources Council
Air Pollution Control Commission
Environmental Quality Board
Air Pollution Advisory Commission
Environmental Quality Commission
9
-------
I. D.
Air Quality Control Regions
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hamp.
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
N. Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
fenna.
Rh. Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Va.
Wisconsin
# Interstate
3
0
3
4
0
1
2
1
1
2
5
0
1
7
5
6
1
5
3
1
2
3
2
3
2
2
0
2
1
2
3
3
2
1
1
6
2
1
3
1
3
2
4
3
1
1
2
2
4
4
# Intrastate
4
4
1
3
11
7
2
1
0
4
4
1
3
4
5
6
6
4
0
4
4
3
4
4
2
3
5
2
2
1
1
5
6
7
1
8
6
4
3
0
7
2
2
9
2
1
5
4
6
4
Total
7
4
4
7
11
8
4
2
1
6
9
1
4
11
10
12
7
9
3
5
6
6
6
7
4
5
5
4
3
3
4
8
8
8
2
14
8
5
6
1
10
4
6
12
3
2
7
6
10
8
10
-------
State # Interstate # Intrastate Total
Wyoming 03 3
American Samoa 01 1
Guam 01 1
Puerto Rico 01 1
Virgin Islands 01 1
11
-------
I. E. Air Quality Control Regions
AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGIONS
Number of AQCR's for:
Alaska - *
American Samoa - 1
Guam - 1
Puerto Rico - 1
Virgin Islands - 1
Hawaii - 1
-------
IDENTIFICATION O3 AIR .QUALITY CONTROL REGIONS
29 Metropolitan Birmingham
62 Evansvilie-Owensboro (X)
1 national Capital (I)
(D.C.-Md.-Va.)
2 Hew Jersey-Dew York-
Connecticut (I)
3 Metropolitan Chicago (I)
(III. -Ind.)
4 Metropolitan Philadel-
phia (I)
(Pa.-N.J.-Del.)
5 Metropolitan Denver
6 Metropolitan Las
Angeles (Calif.}
7 Metropolitan
St. Louis (I) (Mo. -111.)
8 Metropolitan BostonQlaas.)
9 Metropolitan Cincinnati(I)
(Ohio-lad. -Ky.)
10 San Francisco Bay Area
(Calif.)
11 Metropolitan Cleveland
(Ohio)
12 Southwest Pennsylvania
13 Niagara Frontier (N.Y.)
14 Metropolitan Kansas
1-1 City (Mo--Kan.) (I)
w
15 Metropolitan Detroit-
Port Huron (Mich.)
16 Metropolitan BaltimoreQH.)
17 Bart ford -New Haven-Spring -
field (I) (Mass. -Conn.)
IB Metropolitan Indianapolis
" 'Si-i,
30 Metropolitan Toledo (I)
(Ohio-Mich.)
31 St eubvnvl lie -Weir ton -
Wheeling (I) (Ohio-H.Va.)
32.Chatt|anooga (I) (Tenn.-Ca.)
33 Metropolitan Atlanta (Ga.)
34 Metropolitan Memphis (I)
{ark.-Hiss.-Tenn.)
35 Portland (I) (Ore.-Vasn.)
36 Vasatch Front (Utah)
37 Southern Louisiana*
Southeast Texas (I)
38 Southeast Florida
39 Central Oklahoma
40 Omaha-Council Bluffs (I)
(Neb. -Iowa)
42 Charlotte (I) (N.C.-S.C.)
43 Metropolitan Portland (Me.)
44 Albuquerque -Kid Rio
Grande (N.M.)
45 Herrimack Valley-Southern
New Hampshire (H.E.-Mass.)
46 El Faso-Las Cruces -Alamo -
gordo (I) (Tex. -N.M.)
47 Clark-MoJave(I)(Nev.-Arl±,)
48 Metropolitan Fargo-Hoorhead
OJ.D.-Mirm.) (I)
(Ind.-Ky.)
63 Northeast Mississippi
64 Fort faitl. (I) (Ark.-Okla.)
65 Hontington-Ashland-
Portsmouth-Ironton (I)
Ctf.Va.-Ky.-Ohlo)
66 Southeast Minnesota-
La Crosse (I) (Minn. -Vise.)
67 Lake Michigan (Hlsc.)
68 Moblle-Fensaccila-Panasui
City-Southern Mississippi
(Ala. -Miss. -FLs.) (I)
69 Paducab -Cairo (I)(Ky.-IU.)
70 Parker aburg -Marietta (I)
(W.Va.-Ohio)
71 Rockford-Janegville-Belolt
(III. -Wise.) (I)
72 Tennessee River Valley-
Cumberland Mountains (I)
(Ala.-Tenc.)
73 South Bend-Elkhart-Benton
Harbor (I) (Ind. -Mich.)
74 Northwest Eennsylvania-
Youngstown (I) (Pa. -Ohio)
75 Metropolitan Sioux City
(Ioua-!teb.-S.D.) (I)
76 Androscoggin Valley (15
(K.H. -Maine)
77 Jacksonville -Brunswick.
(Fla.-Ga.)
78 Monroe-El Dorado (I)
(L». -Ark.)
and.)
19 Hinneapolig-St. Paul(Minn.)
20 Southeastern Wisconsin
21 Metropolitan Providence (I)
(R.I.-Mass.)
22 Puget Sound (Hash.)
23 Louisville (I) (Ky.-Ind.)
24 Metropolitan Dayton (Ohio)
25 Phoenix-Tucson (Aric.)
16 Metropolitan Houoton-
Gslveston (Tex.)
27 Metropolitan Dallas-Fort
Worth (Tex.)
28 Metropolitan San Antonio
(Tex.)
49 Metropolitan Boise(Idaho)
50 Metropolitan Billings
139 VBBtem Mountain (K.C.)
140 Eastern Shore (Hi.)
141 Central Maryland
142 Southern Maryland
143 Horth Central Wisconsin
144 Southern Wisconsin
145 Great Basin Valley (Calif.)
146 Horth Central Coast(Calif.)
147 Horth Coast (Calif.)
148 Northeast Plateau (Calif.)
149 Sacramento Valley (Calif.)
150 San Diego (Calif.)
LSI San Joaquln VaIley(Calif.)
152 South Central Coaat(Calif-)
153 Southeast Desert (Calif.)
154 Great Falls (Montana)
155 Helena (Montana)
156 Miles City (Montana)
157 Mlsaoula (Montana)
158 Comanehe (Colo.)
159 Grand Mesa (Colo.)
160 Pawnee (Colo.)
161 San Isabel (Colo.)
162 San Lula (Colo.)
163 Yampa (Colo.)
164 Southern Delaware
165 Aroostook (Maine)
166 Down East (Maine)
167 Northwest Maine
168 Eastern Connecticut
(69 Northwestern -Connecticut
170 northern Washington
171 Olympic-Northwest
Wa«Kington
172 South Central Washington
4.73 Eastern Idaho
174 Appalachian (Ky.)
175 BluGgrass (Ky.)
176 North Central Kentucky
177 South Central Kentucky
178 Central Michigan
179 South Central Michigan
130 upper Michigan
LSI East Alabama
182 Alabama ad Tonblgbee Rivera
183 Southeast Alabama
184 Metropolitan Columbus(Ohio)
t85 -Mansfield-Marion (Ohio)
1
186 Northwest Ohio
«7 Sandusky (Ohio)
188 Hilmington-ChillicDChe-
Logan (Ohio)
169 2aneaville-Cambridge (Ohio)
190 North Central Illinois
191 East Central Illinois
192 Heat Central Illinois
193 Southeast Illinois
194 Caaper (Wyoming)
195 Rapid City (S.D.)
196 East Central Indiana
.197 Northeast Indiana
198 southern Indiana
199 Wsbash Valley (Ind.)
£00 Central Oregon
201 Eastern Oregon
202 Southwest Oregon
203 Northwest Oregon
t04 Northesat Iowa
205 North Central Iowa
206 Northwest Iowa
207 Southwest Iowa
208 South Central loua
209 Southeast Iowa
210 Lincoln-Beatrice-
Falrbury (Neb.)
211 Horth Central Kansas
212 Northeast Kansas
213 Northwest Kansas
214 South Central Kansas
215 Southeast Kansas
216 Southwest Kansas
217 Allegheny (W.Va.)
218 Central West Virginia
219 Eastern Panhandle (W.Va.)
220 Kanawha Valley (H.Va.)
221 Horth Central West Virginia
222 Southern West Virginia
223 Central Georgia
224 Northeast Georgia
225 Southwest Georgia
226 Upper Rio Grande Valley
(N.M.)
227 Northeastern Plains (H.M.)
228 Southwestern Mountains-
Augustine Plains (N.M.)
229 Pecos-Permian Basin (N.M.)
230 Central Minnesota
231 Northwest Minnesota
232 Southwest Minnesota
236 Idaho
237 Nebraska
238 Nevada
239 Central New Hampshire
240 Jersey
241 North Dakota
242 South Dakota
243 Utah
244 Vermont
245 Wyoming
-------
SECTION i. F. SIGNIFICANT EPA ACTIONS AFFECTING STATE PROGRAMS
Designation of 247 Air Quality Control Regions
covering all geographic areas of the U.S.
Promulgation of national primary and secondary
standards based on published criteria and which
are necessary to protect the public health and
welfare
Promulgation of regulations for sumbission of
State implementation plans for achieving and
maintaining national standards
Promulgation of regulations for those plans or
portions of plans which are not approved
Promulation of Standards of Performance
(emission) for new or modified stationary
sources
Promulgation of regulations by which States
will establish performance (emission) standards
for existing stationary sources for pollutants
covered by the categories listed for new
source performance standards
Promulgation of hazardous pollutant emission
standards for new and existing stationary
sources
States have. the. primary responsibility jJoA assuring ac.kie.veme.nt and maintenance
national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards within eAch region
thetr State..
Standards (,or particulate. matter, sulfur oxx.de, carbon monoiU.de,, photoc.hcm.Lcmi
oxi.de.nts, nitrogen oxide, and hydrocarbons have, been issued.
States must hold public he.aAtn.gt,, adopt and submit plans within nine, month!,
promulgation of| a national Standard.
Plant, must ptLOvi.de. f^or: emission limitations, compliance. 4che.dul.eA and other
control measures ne.e.de.d to attain standards including but not limited to land-
use, and tAanApoAtation confiolA; monitoii.ng and analyzing Ofj ambient aiA quality;
p-toceduAe* ^on. psie.-con&tAuction tievieia ofa new ttationaAy iou/tce-4 iu.bjc.ct to a
peA($0AjTOMce AiandaAd [i,e.e. below}; intergovernmental cooperation; moni.to.iing
and Ae.poHting o£ emiAAionf, by oianeM, or operator* oft Atationatiy &ouAc.eA; an
emergency episode plan; aA&uranceA of, adequate ruourcu to COM.IJ out the SIP;
and, to the e.xte.nt neceAAary, a periodic mototi vehicle. emiAliion im>pectii'n and
testing program.
-- Once. the. MminiAtrator of, EPA approve* a plan, or a portion of, a plan. State*
have, thne ye.au to achieve primary standard!, and muAt have t>et a reasonable.
spe.ci^ie.d time, period in which to achieve, secondary standards.
States must implement such regulations [substitute, plans}.
Publish Lu>t Ojj stationary source, categories to be. subject to national emission
standards. Sources {,or which standards uaill be. applicable, pre.iie.ntly inciude.:
sul&uric acid plants; steam electric pouter plants; municipal type, refuse incinerators;
nitric acid plants; and Portland cement plants.
This doeA not include, pollutants coveAzd by a criteria document or which appear, on
the. hazardous substances list.
-- Pollutants to be su.bje.ct to such standards pre^intty include.- asbestos, beryllium and
mercury.
The. Administrator shall, when requested by a State., delegate, authority (Joi imptmintint)
and e.n{,or
-------
SECTION II
PROGRAMS
15
-------
II. A.
The tabulation on the following page lists the
status of the States authority for carrying out its
Air Implementation Plan under the requirements of
Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 51, Subpart B, Paragraph
51.11(A), Code of Federal Regulations.
Changes in State authorities will be occurring
continuously as legislators enact new laws pertaining
to control of air pollution and to meet the requirements
of the Federal statues.
The information contained herein is the status
of such authority as of June 5, 1972.
16
-------
II.A. Legal Authority Needed to Carry Out State Implementation Plans - 6/5/72
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Ind iana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
N. Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rh. Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
Vir. Islands
Amer . Samoa
ADEQUATE
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
LESS THAN ADEQUATE
EDERAL DELEGATION AVAILABLE
5 (a)
5 (a)
5(b)*
5 (a)
5 (a)
4(d)
5(a)*
5 (a) (new law will
5 (a)
5 (a)*
5 (a & b)
5 (a)
3
4 (a), 5
4* , 5*
5 (a)*
5 (a)
5 (a)
5(a)**
5 (a)
4(c), 5
FED. DELE. NOT AVAILABLE
2
2
correct deficiency,)
3
2
1, 2
3
*Federal authority provided thru delegation **Federal delegation requested
17
-------
KEY
Legal Authority
1. State Agency precluded from controlling cotton
gins and saw mills.
2. State does not have emergency episode authority
comparable to Section 303 of the Clean Air Act.
3. State may not control construction, modification
or operation of certain sources.
4. a. State cannot require recordkeeping.
b. State cannot require recordkeeping of existing
sources.
c. State cannot make inspections and conduct tests.
d. State cannot require reporting and recordkeeping.
5. a. Emission data not available to public.
b. State cannot require installation or use of
monitoring devices.
18
-------
II. B. FUNDING
The tabulation on the following page
shows the budgeted funds by State and local
agencies and by the Federal Government to
support air pollution control programs for
Fiscal Year 1972.
Figure II.B.I is a history chart reflecting
the growth of State, local and Federal expendi-
tures starting with 1965, the first year in
which Federal grant funds were made available,
to the present.
Figure II.B.2 indicates the growth in
the number of State and local agencies receiving
Federal funds for the period of 1965-1972.
19
-------
II. B. 1.
STATE F.Y. 1972 BUDGETED FUNDING
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Mass.
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hamp.
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Penna.
Rh. Island
S. Carolina
South Dakota
STATE FUNDS
$239,100
28,889
236,824
136,000
6,399,601
378,651
494,500
173,931
117,068
572,392
291,221
193,989
61,000
1,012,631
265,000
212,130
110,027
335,902
225,535
92,750
430,657
223,212
348,273
472,357
64,000
143,312
103,834
25,824
15,163
78,363
1,212,602
155,058
1,767,000
276,850
19,660
290,250
115,007
385,785
1,588,082
89,156
332,125
7,000
LOCAL FUNDS
$86,449
51,470
206,832
8,459,665
232,760
326,430
421,171
97,578
3,368,858
662,873
105,771
82,947
202,062
558,642
377,723
1,007,007
166,093
686,265
34,934
119,788
131,634
141,547
62,905
7,133,450
274,413
1,564,916
172,057
317,855
1,537,712
85,022
FEDERAL FUNDS
$527,324
120,334
415,762
261,000
3,521,972
610,680
1,355,796
234,314
234,134
1,097,337
564,609
96,445
60,000
2,278,292
748,054
453,233
384,841
602,510
350,021
192,000
1,425,688
1,312,921
1,841,629
589,005
120,000
1,021,214
239,007
231,929
191,827
185,409
2,256,850
476,898
3,967,790
816,574
45,000
1,850,107
425,900
570,784
3,332,500
133,899
385,773
21,000
TOTAL FUNDS
$852,873
200,693
859,418
397,000
18,381,238
1,222,091
2,176,726
408,245
351,202
2,090,900
953,408
290,434
121,000
6,659,781
1,675,927
771,134
577,815
1,140,474
575,556
284,750
2,414,987
1,913,856
3,196,909
1,227,455
184,000
1,850,791
377,775
377,541
338,624
263,772
3,610,999
694,861
12,868,240
1,367,837
64,660
3,705,273
712,964
1,274,424
6,458,294
223,055
802,920
28,000
20
-------
STATE
STATE FUNDS
LOCAL FUNDS
FEDERAL FUNDS
TOTAL FUNDS
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
Vir. Islands
Amer . Samoa
$334,830
1,159,719
135,252
97,228
247,899
818,345
396,250
291,000
34,722
16,857
234,047
41,168
8,000
$263,339
663,094
180,333
593,031
14,322
426,911
$973,179
3,254,021
176,778
154,426
632,197
1,103,199
387,308
754,480
68,016
33,714
464,417
100,043
$1,571,348
5,076,834
312,030
251,654
1,060,429
2,514,575
797,880
1,472,391
102,738
50,571
698,464
141,211
8,000
TOTAL
$23,536,028
$30,817,859
$43,652,140
$98,006,027
21
-------
-+rr
r-r -V
'^^~
-
m
-M-
-De
-m +-
--4 I
-44
tt
22
-------
itr
Ob
bo D/ oo by 70
Fiscal Year
72
23
-------
II. C. STAFFING
The following tables provide information as
to the general overall staffing situation of control
agencies with regard to:
II.C.I. Man-year levels in FY 1972 being
devoted to the four major functional areas of
pollution control activities (as defined in
Appendix C), based mostly on data submitted in
State implementation plans. For comparison
purposes, the FY 1975 GAP manpower model estimates
are provided. These estimates are not to be
taken as representing the levels that each State
will actually need to reach in order to carry out
successful control programs. The model was
developed to calculate the long-range staffing
needs of all State and local agencies predicated
upon a data base utilizing factors such as
population, area of coverage, manufacturing
establishments, capital investments in manufacturing
and minimum air monitoring requirements called for
by Federal regulations. It represents an attempt
to predict the nationwide manpower requirement for
planning purposes and, as with any estimating
technique, is subject to individual exceptions,
variations and future modification based on actual
experience among the States.
II.C.2. Major fields of study for persons
employed in the various occupational categories
common to air pollution control agencies. General
descriptions of the duties of each category are
contained in Appendix D.
II.C.3. The principal reasons for existing
staff vacancies as of April 1971, based upon
responses received from State and local control
agencies.
24
-------
II C.I. Staffing by State
Current Man-year level by function as compar ed to OAF manpower model estimate
of need by 1975
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Conn.
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
FY
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
Technical
Services
18.0
38.6
1.5
U.2
16.3
22.0
li.O
18. U
157-0
166. U
23.7
21.3
26.1
la. 6
7-2
7 = 9
6.5
8.9
51-7
17.6
55-7
U.o
3-9
U.O
12.2
52.2
117.2
III. 7
63.1
9.8
29.5
Enforcement
6.0
51-9
1-5
2.8
13-6
20.5
1.8
30.0
283.0
327 = 5
22.5
28. U
16.9
56.1
5-9
6.5
6.0
8.0
89-8
2U.3
71.8
3-7
8.7
l.U
11.7
92.5
186.0
35-9
7)4.1
8.2
38.2
Engineering
19-0
39.5
2-5
U.6
10.U
1U.1
6.6
18.8
209.0
213.8
8.3
15.6
9.9
51-2
3-3
10. U
U.o
3.6
U5.6
17.6
5U.U
2.8
U.I
1-5
7.0
56.2
168.2
15.5
69.1
10.5
27.8
Management
12.1
la. 7
2.5
5-9
13-7
18.1
U.i
21.6
200.0
226.7
23-14
20.9
20.8
U7.7
U.6.
8.0
7 = 5
6.5
59.9
11.5
58.3
3-5
5.U
5.1
9.9
iii.U
151.1
28.3
66.1
10.5
30.6
Total
55.1
171.7
8.0
17 = 5
5U-o
7U.7
16.5
88.8
8U9.0
93h-k
77.9
86.2
73-7
196.6
21.0
32.8
2U.O
27.0
1U6.0
2U7.0
71.0
2l|.0.2
lU.O
22.1
12.0
U0.8
312.3
622.5
9U-14
272. U
39.0
126.1
-------
II C.I. Staffing by State (cont'd)
Current Man-year level by function as compared to OAF manpower model estimate
State
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Mass.
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hamp.
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
FT
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
Technical
Services
7.9
23-3
23.0
32.9
15-7
20.5
3.8
16.0
39. k
21.3
77.8
la.o
82.2
37-9
3.U
21.0
25.lt
I0l.6
9.0
9-8
3.3
12.8
7-1
8.5
li.O
11.6
191.6
12.3
12. U
213.6
U.L iieeu u,y -L/
Enforcement
6.9
3-3
21.8
38.3
10.0
31.0
2.5
22.3
U3-9 .
la- 3
105.9
1*7-2
11^5-3
57-1
3.0
30. h
2U.2
69.5
11.0
9.9
3-9
19.2
7.6
U.8
3-6
lU.i
353.2
9.7
10. h
392.8
i j
Engineering
8.5
20.1
18.0
35.7
10.6
65-5
2.U
13-7
30.7
20.5
72.5
26.2
152.6
3l4.0
2.0
28.7
18.3
1+U.o
3-5
5-3
3.0
10.8
3.2
2.7
3-0
10.5
219-2
8.5
3-9
230.7
Management
8.7
23.9
13.0
3U.3
9.8
37 = 5
3-U
16.7
36.5
38.0
82.1
U7.6
121.9
U.l;
U.3
25.7
25.U
50.7
6.0
8.0
3.8
13-7
8.9
5-1
7.0
11.6
237-3
13-0
8.6
268.2
Total
32.0
98.6
75-8
lUl-2
U6.1
15^-5
12.1
68.7
191.0
150.5
121.1
338.3
162.0
502.0
U9.0
170. U
12.6
105.8
93-3
208.8
29.5
33.0
lU.O
56.5
26.8
21.1
17.6
U7.8
208.0
1001.3
U3.5
35.3
638.0
1105.3
26
-------
II C. 1. Staffing by State (cont'd)
Current Man-year level by function as compared to GAP manpower model estimate
of need by 197$
State
North
Carolina
North
Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Penna.
Rhode
Island
South
Carolina
South
Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Va.
FT
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
Technical
Services
35.6
5i.i
1.9
3-9
U8.0
120.5
22.1
20.6
21.9
27.2
77.0
125.6
5.0
17.1
1U.2
32.0
1.0
U.2
U2.8
77-1
90.1
9.2
13.8
2.0
6.9
18.8
51.1
28.5
39.3
19. It
20.3
Enforcement
28.0
83.2
1.2
6.3
62.0
161.8
20.3
31-3
16.6
III. 6
123. U
191.2
6.0
23.7
2U-3
Ul-3
1.0
6.7
5U.9
205.3
1U5-9
2.0
13-3
U.o
8.7
26.0
57.8
33.0
52.3
12.2
21.1;
Engineering
17.6
71;. 8
0.1;
2.0
32.0
185-3
5.1*
15.0
15.9
31-U
bk.k
177.1
1.5
lU.U
13.3
1*1-3
1.5
2.2
ltf-1
71;- 7
131-7
2.0
8.8
2.0
5-7
12.0
U2.8
21.5
U8.8
10.2
26. h
Management
28.1
67.0
1.7
3-9
59-0
150.0
13.9
21.1;
22.1
32.1
86.0
158.3
3.5
17.7
13-3
36.8
3-6
U.2
U6.U
37. U
117.9
5.0
11.5
l+.o
6.8
30.0
U8.6
33-0
Ii5.0
11.2
21.8
Total
109.3
276.1
5-2
16.1
201.0
617.6
61.7
88.3
76.5
132.3
330.8
652.2
16.0
72.9
65.1
151- k
7-1
17-3
102.0
19n..2
39U. 5
1;85.6
18.2
U7.Ii
12.0
28.1
86.0
200.3
116.0
185.U
53.0
89-9
27
-------
II. C. 1. Staffing by State (cont'd)
Current Man-year level by function as compared to OAF manpower model estimate
of need by 1975
State
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Puerto
Rico
Guam
American
Samoa
Virgin
Islands
FT
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1972
1972
Technical
Services
18.8
kl.k
1.0
3.8
10.2
11.1;
1.0
.k
2.k
Enforcement
27 = 5
77.2
1.5
k.o
5-0
30.3
.1
.2
.6
Engineering
13«U
61.8
1.5
1.8
2-5
13.6
.7
.k
1.0
Management
13-1;
59.8
2.2
3.1
10.0
17.7
1.2
1.0
2.0
Total
73-1
2U6.2
6.2
12.7
32.7
73.0
3.0
2.0
6.0
TOTAL FT 72
TOTAL FT 75
11,023.9
28
-------
II.C.2. Staffing by Occupational Category
MAJOR FIELDS
OF STUDY
Agriculture
Bio] . , Phys.
Science
Social Science
Business,
Commerce
Mathematics
Liberal Arts,
Humanities
Education
Heal tli
Professions
Engineering
Other*
TOTAL
OCCUPAT EOKAL CATEGORY
Director
5
68
4
8
1
2
4
40
146
51
329
Supervisor
6
80
4
15
6
4
7
33
185
45
385
Engineer [ChcmisL |Metrologist| Specialist Technician; Inspector (Aide
I
2
27
-
5
3
-
-
-
317
15
369
11
1
53
-
7
2
2
4
6
403
39
517
1
1
f
z
117
1
_
2
-
2
3
6
13
146
II
8
182
2
1
3
1
2
3
14
17
233
1
-
9
1
_
1
-
-
-
1
1
13
II
-
13
1
1
1
1
5
-
6
9
37
I
12
81
3
6
5
3
5
-
25
15
155
11
4
91
4
2
-
9
5
9
15
29
168
I
1
16
2
1
2
1
1
12
12
48
if III
1
I
II
f
£,
23
1
£
3
4
2
1
9
32
79
' j
1
14
3
-
1
-
-
5
8
11
43
2
15
3
4
2
4
4
1
3
9
47
8
45
13
19
3
4
14
1
20
30
LV
III
2
37
3
4
1
3
3
2
12
34
101
I jJJ
-
4
-
-
-
2
1
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
5
-
-
1
-
-
1
5
Acl.iUnls,
Clerical
Other
2
33
18
18
6
16
4
10
22
70
199
T
0
A
k_
58
910
64
93
42
54
64
114
1204
433
3036'
^Includes: Law, General Science, Medicine and Degrees x-jilh no field specified
- None Reported
April 1971
-------
II. C. 3.
Reasons for Vacancies
Reason
No Difficulty Expected
Lack of Trained,
Qualified Applicants
Salary Inadequacies
Government Freeze
on Hiring
Lack of Funds or
Grant
Awaiting Exam Results
on Applicant
Acceptance
Personnel System
Problems
Limited Space
Other
State Agency
75
40
10
31
11
14
13
5
7
Local Agency
101
58
53
17
24
12
0
0
21
Total
176
98
63
48
35
26
13
5
28
Percent
35.8
19.9
12.8
9.7
7.1
5.3
2.6
1.0
5.7
TOTAL
206
286
492
100.0
30
-------
II. C. 4 STATE ASSIGNEES
The EPA State Assignee Program, initiated in
July 1971, provides for the hiring of a limited
number of professional and technical persons by
EPA and assigning them to State and local air
pollution control agencies. This Program was
developed in accordance with Sections 105(d) and
301(b) of the Clean Air Act. An essential ingredient
of this program is the distinctly limited, short-term
nature of the assignment. The period of detail is
not to exceed two years with the objective being to
encourage control agencies to hire assignees during
or upon conclusion of the two year period of employment.
Control agencies are sometimes at a disadvantage
in hiring professionals immediately upon their
graduation (or technicians with experience) due to hiring
freezes, ceiling limitations, or merit system regulations
such as, residency requirements, etc. Federal regu-
lations and pay scales often permit greater flexibility
with respect to an agency's ability to compete for and
hire persons in scarcity categories as well as those
who possess skill presently not provided for through
State or local personnel systems.
During their assignment period, assignees will
receive training and on-the-job experience that should
enhance their value to the control agency with the
result that at the end of two years, the agency will
want to make every possible effort to hire them rather
than recruit new inexperienced personnel.
The following table reflects the number of State
assignees presently on board and pending assignment
as of May 31, 1972. A summary of the various
occupation categories and the number of persons
employed in each is also provided. The majority of
persons hired through this program start at Federal entrance
level salaries for the professional services. This is
evidenced by the following distribution of filled positions
at each grade level:
GRADE NUMBER GRADE NUMBER
GS-4 4 GS-7 58
GS-5 50 GS-9 14
GS-6 3 GS-11 4
31
-------
II.G.I)..
STATUS OF STATE ASSIGNEE PROGRAM
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
As of May 31, 1972
Job Category
Civil Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemist
General Engineer
General Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
-
Civil Engineer
Chemical Engineer
General Engineer
Civil Engineer
Physicist
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Electronic Technician
General Engineer
General Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemist
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Sanitary Engineer
0
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
On Board
2
1
1
0
1
-
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
I
i
1
2
1
1
7
1
2
3
l
0
3
1
Fending
0
0
0
1
1
-
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
2
h
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
32
-------
STATUS OF STATE ASSIGNEE PROGRAM (cont'd.)
State
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
As of May 31, 1772
Job Category
Civil Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemist
Civil Engineer
Engineering Technician
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
General Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemist
Chemical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Industrial Engineer
Chemical Engineer
General Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Engineering Technician
Chemist
Engineering Technician
Electrical Engineer
Engineering Technician
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
General Engineer
Meteorologist
Computer Programmer
Meteorologist
-
Sanitary Engineer
Meteorologist
Chemist
On Board
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
1 -
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
Pending
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
-------
II.C.U. STATUS OF STATE ASSIGNEE PROGRAM
As of May31,
(cont'd)
State
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Job Category
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Materials Engineer
Civil Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Engineering Technician
General Engineer
Mathematician
Mechanical Engineer
Meteorologist
Physical Science Tech.
Engineering Technician
Physicist
Mechanical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Chemical Engineer
General Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Engineering Technician
Industrial Engineer
Physical Science Tech.
Chemist
Mechanical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Chemist
Physical Science Tech.
Physical Scientist
General Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
On Board
1
0
1
1
Fending
3
U
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
2
2
1
2
1
h
2
3
k
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
34
-------
II.C.U. STATUS OF STATE ASSIGNEE PROGRAM (cont'd)
State
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
American Samoa
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Job Category
Chemical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Chemist
Mechanical Engineer
Materials Engineer
Meteorologist
Electrical Engineer
General Engineer
Industrial Engineer
Sanitary Engineer
Physical Scientist
Mathematician
Physicist
Technicians
Computer Programmer
Job Category
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemist
Chemical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Chemist
Civil Engineer
Chemist
General Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Civil Engineer
Chemist
-
General Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Chemist
On Board
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
Engineering Technician 0
TOTALS
Summary by Job Category &
On Board
31
12
111-
h3
1
k
5
9
1
2
0
0
1
9
I
133
Grade
Fending
17
0
3
6
0
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
1
9
0
Pending
0
k
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
Jl
Grade
GS-5-11
GS-5-7
GS-9-11
GS-5-11
GS-7
GS-5-9
GS-5-6
GS-5-9
GS-5
GS-7 -11
GS-11
GS-5
GS-7 -11
GS-U-6
GS-7
TOTALS
35
-------
II.D. SALARIES
The following table (II.D.I) provides FY 1971
full-time State and local salary ranges for each of the
air pollution control occupational categories contained
in Appendix D.
Tables II.D.2 and II.D.3 give the salary range
and the mean salary range by occupational categories.
While there is a wide difference between the
highs and the lows in terms of salary ranges in
Table II.D.2 there is no apparent relationship as to
the type of agency.
The data in these tables represent ranges for
a specific position and therefore, are not necessarily
the actual salary of any given individual.
36
-------
11.D.I STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SALARY RANGES WITHIN OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawai i
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Guam
Range
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
Hiqh
Low
Hiqh
Low
High
Low
High.
Low
High
Low
High
Low
Hi ah
Occuoational Title -
Director
10.5
18.0
::
12.7
19.1
7.7
10.3
11.9
34.6
10.6
22.0
13.0
25.0
__
25.5
33.2
13.7
22.5
16.5
21.9
13.8
21.5
13.0
17.0
15.0
26.7
8.2
21.2
8.5
19.4
13.4
17 fi
12.0
Supervisor
10.0
13.9
13.9
17.8
11.0
16.9
9.0
26.4
12.0
18.1
10.0
15.0
--
13.2
24.3
10.9
20.5
10.2
18.1
::
10.0
T2.5
10.6
20.5
8.4
14.0
11.9
Id.d
Engineer
b.9 '
11.1
9.6
13.4
9.0
12.2
8.7
21.5
12.0
16.5
9.5
13.5
9.0
13.0
9.0
17.3
9.0
22.6
9.3
14.6
8.6
15.3
11.0
13.0
6.2
21.0
10.3
12.0
9.3
17.6
8.5
. 13.1
Chemist
6.0
10.3
12.0
15.4
7.8
12.7
7.7
10.3
8.5
16.1
7.5
12.9
5.2
14.0
8.5
13.0
7.8
16.6
7.8
11.2
8.5
15.3
.9.1
17.4
6.0
12.8
9.2
11.1
9.8
1?.5
9.0
Meteorologist
* "
--
--
--
8.4
17.7
11.0
16.5
--
7.0
10.0
--
11.9
16.6
--
--
--
9.6
14.9
--
--
--
--
Specialist
/.b
9.7
12.0
15.4
7.8
12.0
--
8.0
20.4
6.7
14.9
6.7
11.8
7.0
12.0
9.0
17.3
7.4
13.5
6.5
13.6
8.5
15.3
7.0
10.0 .
15.8
21.0
5.6
10.8
8.0
11.9
8.0
17. d
Technician
__
10.4
13.3
8.6
11.0
5.7
7.0
7.9
18.5
3.6
9.3
7.5
10.0
5.0
9.0
9.0
15.7
4.1
9.0
5.3
9.0
--
--
7.2
16.2
4.5
9.5
4.0
12.0
--
Inspector
1 .2
8.. 8
4.3
8.7
6.9
15.7
7.2
11.7
8.0
9.0
6.5
8.3
8.5
18.0
7.6
11.7
6.1
11.0
8.5
13.2
--
5.0
21.0
4.5
10.0
7.3
8.8
7.0
fi.fi
5.3
Aide
--
--
5.8
6.9
__
9.0
11.0
9.4
11.8
::
--
::
4.6
7.2
--
--
--
--
--
-------
Salary Range by State
State
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetl
Michigan
Minnesota '
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Ham p shir
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North
Carolina
Puerto Rico
Range
Low
Hiqh
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
sLow
High
Low
High
Lew
High
Low
High
L ow
Hi oh
Low
Hi_ah
Low
hi oh
Low
Hinh
eLow
Hicjh
Low
Hiah
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Occupational Title
Director
13.8
17.7
14.9
19.7
n.9
19.7
11.7
23.7
21.8
21.8
20.0
25.8
10.3
20.5
9.0
12.0
12.9
20.8
14.1
17.6
--
1 Z . 1
20.2
::
13.0
23.0
8.3
15.3
12.3
29.9
8.0
10.8
13.2
Supervisor) Engineer
9.3
14.5
II. b
18.2
y.'d
12.2
7.9
19.8
10.4
18.8
10.0
19.7
a.J
17.5
--
8.3
13.4
"" ~
--
a. a
14.2
::
S.b
19.9
9.0
12.3
10.1
29.0
6.4
12.0
9.6
12.0
6.9 ~
14.9
8.6
15.4
a.u
13.5
8.5
18.0
8T9~
17.1
10.0
16.0
9.4
12.3
8.0
8.3
14.1
8.4
14.1
--
6.9
14.9
::
8.9
14.9
7.6
12.3
10.5
21.7
8.0
15.0
"
Chemist
8.4
12.3
7.4
11.9
::
8.2
16.3
7.2
12.6
9.0
12.2
__
8.1
12.8
7.2
9.0
_ _
9.4
11.9
8.0
9.5
8.5
18.1
" ~
6.6
15.6
7.6
9.8
6.6
10.8
Meteorologist
9.3
11.9
/.&
11.2
::
9.6
12.6
--
13.3
14.2
_ .»
_ _
--
--
--
_ _
::
8.1
8.5
8.3
10.4
9.1
17.5
10.3
13.1
--
Specialist
4.9
10.8
::
6.0
18.3
6.8
8.3
9.6
15.7
8.0
13.6
_ _
5.1
13.5
7.6
10.8
__
~~
8.0
9.0
8.1
18.1
6.6
9.6
7.5
14.7
5.0
12.0
9.0
10.8
Technician
b.b
10.8
8.3
14.4
7.0
9.2
5.1
16.8
5.7
9.2
7.0
13.1
6.3
13.1
4.8
7.2
5.0
12.2
-_
_ _
8.9
11.2
6.0
8.0
6.7
10.0
7.1
8.9
6.2
16.5
6.1
8.8
2.9
4.2
Inspector Aide
4.b b./
11.9 8.1
b.4
8.5
__
6.0
13.7
6.8
12.9
8.8
13.9
6.8
14.1
__
5.9
10.1
-»
7.5
11.2
--
5.2
11.6
~ -
6.1
12.8
5.8
12.2
4.7
5.6
b.O
9.6
__
5.0
8.2
7.7
7.7
-
5.2
8.0
6.6
8.6
--'
::
--
4.3
6.8
--
5.2
9.2
--
" ~
00
-------
Salary Range by State
State
North
Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsyl vanic
Rh. Island
South
Carolina
South
Dakota
Tennessee
lexas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West
V i rg i n i a
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Vir. Islajid:
Arner . bamoa
Range
Low
High
Low
High
Low
Hiqh
Low
Hiqh
L'ow
Hiqh
Low
Hi oh
Low
High
Low
KiQh
Low
High
Lew
Hiqh
Low
Hi oh
LOW
Hiqh
Low
Hi oh
Low
High
Low
Hiah
Low
Hiqh
Low
Hiqh
Low
High
Low
Occupational Title
Director
--
9.0
21.1
9.7
19.4
14.0
21.0
11.0
27.2
13.4
15.3
__
-_
13.8
17.0
9.7
20.0
13.4
18.0
::
12.0
17.2.
__
17.8
21.0
--
12.0
15.0
7.5
Supervisor (Engineer
--
8.5
18.7
9.9
12.6
10.5
17.0
10.4
21.6
6.0
16.6
__
7.2
16.9
6.2
18.0
__
-
9.8
15.6
_
::
10.0
17.4
__
::
--
6.9
17.5
10.2
13.2
9.0
15.0
6.9
20.0
9.4
11.2
"" ~
' --8.6 '
11.4
9.0
14.0
9.5
18.0
9.9
14.8
9.0
13.7
__
__
8.1
14.6
7.4
9,9
12.0
15.0
Chemist
5.0
14.5
6.5
12.6
5.0
13.0
/.8
14.6
9.0
10.7
8.0
10.9
__
8.0
12.2
5.2
14.0
/.4
9.9
::
8.0
14.4
"~
'
8.5
11.4
--
Meteorologist
--
--
9.2
12.7
.10.0
12.8
8.5
14.6
~~'~
--
9.0
10.8
7.9
10.9
- =
-
::
::
::
--
_
Specialist
--
7.8
13.5
6.9
10.0
8.5
12.0
7.6
12.6
__
9.4
12.1
::
6.4
10.3
6.2
14.0
7.4
12.1
-
6.0
12.4
-
-
7.9
11.0
--
--
Technician jlnspector
4.3
13.3
5.6
9.7
7.0
11.1
5.0
- 9.4
6.b
7.7
6.1
9.7
--
4.3
8.2
4.5
9.7
6./
9.0
--
7.0
9.1
_
--
7.0
10.1
6.9
_, 9.O.. _.
9.0
11.0
5.5
13.3
5.7
9.1
8.0
11.0
5.8
13.0
b.9
8.5
5.3
7.8
6.0
9.0
4.4
13.0
~*~
6.5
12.4
__
-
9.0
10.0
<»
Aide
4.2
7.5
5.1
6.5
**.
5.0
6.7
*~ **
.
5.4
6.0
3.4
10.0
--
5.0 '
6.4
::
--
--
4.5
O-J
-------
II.D.2
Salary Range by Occupation
(thousands of dollars)
Occupational Title
Director
Supervisor
Engineer I
Engineer II
Chemist I
Chemist II
Meteorologist I
Meteorologist II
Specialist I
Specialist II
Technician I (Trainee)
Technician II
Technician III
Inspector I (Trainee)
Inspector II
Inspector III
Aide I
Aide II
Administrative, Clerical,
and Other
State
Low
7.7
7.6
6.2
7.4
6.2
5.0
7.6
7.0
6.5
5.6
2.9
3.5
5.2
5.2
4.7
6.1
4.6
4.3
2.9
Range
High
29.9
27.0
19.3
22.6
13.6
18.1
13.3
17.7
19.3
20.4
11.1
13.9
18.5
18.0
13.8
13.6
10.0
10.0
22.6
Local
Low
7.3
6.0
8.4
9.0
5.0
6.0
7.9
8.3
5.1
4.9
4.1
4.0
5.8
4.3
4.5
5.0
3.4
5.4
3.4
Range
High
34.6
29.0
16.4
21.7
14.5
17.2
15.3
17.5
15.3
16.1
13.5
13.5
16.5
14.9
21.0
17.2
8.0
11.8
21.4
40
-------
II.D.3
Mean Salary Range for All Agencies
Occupational Title
Director
Supervisor
Engineer I
Engineer II
Chemist I
Chemist II
Meteorologist I
Meteorologist II
Specialist I
Specialist II
Technician I (Trainee)
Technician II
Technician III
Inspector I (Trainee)
Inspector II
Inspector III
Aide I
Aide II
Low
15.3
13.5
10.5
12.5
8.6
10.0
10.3
10.9
8.3
9.7
7.0
7.9
8.6
7.4
8.4
9.3
5.8
6.7
High
18.1
16.6
12.9
15.5
10.6
12.5
12.2
14.2
10.6
12.2
9.0
9.8
10.9
9.7
10.3
11.2
7.0
8.0
, Administrative, Clerical,
All Other 6.6 8.0
41
-------
II.E. STATE BY STATE RANKING
The table on the following page ranks each State
according to population; the total staff of State and local
control agencies; and the amount of FY 1972 money available
for air pollution control on the basis of State, local, and
total funds.
The following are the top ten States in descending order
for each of the above categories:
POPULATION
California
New York
Pennsylvania
Texas
Illinois
Ohio
Michigan
New Jersey
Florida
Massachusetts
STAFFING STATE FUNDS LOCAL FUNDS TOTAL FUNDS
California California
New York New York
Texas Pennsylvania
PennsylvaniaNew Jersey
Illinois
New Jersey
Ohio
Maryland
Michigan
Florida
Texas
Illinois
Washington
Florida
Connecticut
Minnesota
California
New York
Illinois
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Michigan
Missouri
Texas
Indiana
Washington
California
New York
Illinois
Pennsylvania
Texas
Ohio
New Jersey
Michigan
Washington
Maryland
42
-------
II. E. STATE BY STATE RANKING
TOTALS
1. Alabama
2. Alaska
3. Arizona
4. Arkansas
5. California
6. Colorado
7. Connecticut
8. Delaware
9. Dis.t. of Columbia
10. Florida
11. Georgia
12. Hawaii
13. Idaho
14. Illinois
15. Indiana
16. Iowa
17. Kansas
18. Kentucky
19. Louisiana
20. Maine
21. Maryland
22. Massachusetts
23. Michigan
24. Minnesota
25. Mississippi
26. Missouri
27. Montana
28. Nebraska
29. Nevada
30. New Hampshire
31. New Jersey
32. New Mexico
33. New York
34. North Carolina
35. North Dakota
36. Ohio
37. Oklahoma
38. Oregon
39. Pennsylvania
40. Rhode Island
41. South Carolina
42. South Dakota
43. Tennessee
44. Texas
45. Utah
46. Vermont
47. Virginia
48. Washington
49. West Virginia
50. Wisconsin
51. Wyoming
52. Guam
53. Puerto Rico
54. Virgin Islands
Amer. Samoa
POPULATION*
21
51
33
32
1
30
24
47
41
9
15
40
43
5
11
25
28
23
20
38
18
10
7
19
29
13
44
35
48
42
8
37
2
12
46
6
27
31
3
39
26
45
17
4
36
49
14
22
34
16
50
53
26
54
55
STAFF
26
49
27
41
1
18
21
38
37
10
23
43
47
5
15
32
34
20
30
46
8
11
9
29
45
16
35
43
36
40
6
31
2
13
53
7
25
19
4
42
24
50
14
3
39
47
17
12
28
22
51
54
33
52
55
STATE FUNDS
25
49
26
35
1
14
3?
37
8
19
31
46
6
23
30
39
16
28
42
11
29
15
10
45
34
40
50
53
44
4
33
2
22
51
21
38
13
3
43
18
55
17
5
36
41
24
7
12
20
48
52
27
47
54
LOCAL FUNDS
30
U
?n
i
19
-K
1^
29
3
q
28
32
21
__
11
14
6
24
--
7
35
27
26
--
25
33
2
17
--
4
23
16
5
--
31
--
18
8
--
--
22
10
36
12
--
--
--
--
--
TOTAL FUNDS
26
47
25
36
1
21
11
35
39
12
24
42
50
3
15
29
33
22
34
43
10
13
8
20
48
14
37
38
40
44
7
32
2
18
52
6
30
19
4
46
27
54
16
5
41
45
Z.6
y
28
17
51
53
31
49
55
*1970 Census
43
-------
SECTION III - OPERATIONS
III. A . Percent of Effort by Function
The table shown below provides the percent of
effort being devoted to each of the four functional
program areas by State, local and multijurisdictional
agencies as of April 1971. (A multijurisdictional
agency is defined as one which is responsible for
air pollution control program activities within two
or more political jurisdictions within the same
State or within two or more States.)
It is interesting to note that local agencies
were devoting 30 percent of their effort to enforce-
ment activities as compared to 16 percent by State
agencies. Based on a summary of FY 1972 funding by
function of State and local agencies, it is estimated
that more efforts will be devoted to enforcement
( 34 percent local and 20 percent State). Thus, it
appears that local agencies continue to carry out
a significant part of this function within many
States.
Agency Type
State
Local
Multijuris-
dictional
Percent of Effort in Each Function
Management
21
14
20
Technical
34
23
25
Enforcement
16
30
34
Engineering
13
13
11
Other
16
20
10
44
-------
III. B. Attendence at Training Courses - FY 1972
Listed below are the number of State, local and other
personnel, such as those from universities and/or industry
attending EPA sponsored short course training at Headquarters
and in the field. Normally the courses are one week, but in
some instances may be longer. They are especially valuable
to new professionals just entering the field of air pollution
without such previous training as well as to experienced
individuals who need to keep abreast of constantly changing
technical developments.
Alabama 54
Alaska 34
Arizona 10
Arkansas 13
California 171
Colorado 131
Connecticut 15
Delaware 4
D. C. 75
Florida 171
Georgia 78
Hawaii 8
Idaho 3
Illinois 122
Indiana 71
Iowa 20
Kansas 38
Kentucky 35
Louisiana 13
Maine 10
Maryland 94
Massachusetts 53
Michigan 25
Minnesota 64
Mississippi 10
Missouri 115
Montana 16
Nebraska 25
Nevada 13
New Hampshire 5
New Jersey 71
New Mexico 13
New York 169
North Carolina 381
North Dakota 3
Ohio 178
Oklahoma 48
Oregon 17
Pennsylvania 105
Rhode Island 10
South Carolina 42
South Dakota 8
Tennessee 78
Texas 197
Utah 3
Vermont 13
Virginia 93
Washington 120
West Virginia 6
Wisconsin 67
Wyoming 14
Virgin Islands 6
Puerto Rico 4
Foreign 74
TOTAL 3216
-------
III. C. Training by Profession*
The table shown below distributes the numbers of
persons receiving short course training according to
their principal profession and where they come
from. The relatively large number of engineers in
the "all other" category represents, for the most
part, persons from educational institutions preparing
for careers in air pollution control.
PROFESSION
STATE
LOCAL ALL OTHERS TOTAL
Administrators
Chemists
Engineers
Health Educators
Indus. Hygienists
Meteorologists
Phys. Scientists
Sanitarians
Statisticians
Technicians
Others
TOTAL
40
116
426
10
17
30
20
55
0
153
125
992
80
36
175
5
8
8
5
164
5
210
184
880
81
159
649
14
14
263
14
14
7
80
49
1344
201
311
1250
29
39
301
39
233
12
443
358
3216
*Projected, based on 3/31/72 actual and FY 1972 total
46
-------
III. D. Major Sources
of Pollution
The following table indicates the major sources
of air pollution within each State. This table
does not represent all sources of pollution. Of the
sources listed in the following table; the five major
categories are:
Open Burning
Transportation
Power Generation
Industrial Processes
Petroleum Refineries
and Storage
47
-------
III .D. MAJOR SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION WITHIN STATES
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
(/}
__
,5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
mm
Cr
,(
E
^5
CQ
c
OJ
Q.
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
i_
o
ro
OJ
tp-
O
C
1 1
X
X
X
X
X
X
c
o
r
rD
4->
O
Q.
CO
E
ro
i-
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PTCL
cr
1
£
re
CG
4_>
ro
C
X
X
X
X
X
X.
vrmv
cr
E
r
ro
OJ
E
o
00
oC
V
O
o
o:
X
X
X
CO
i.
£
CJ
£
CO
<-
CD
Q.
O.
O
o
X
5WS
CO
5_
a
cu
co
£
j
E
1
E
H
cr
1
E
S-
cc
I
ai
3
u_
X
X
X
r
CO
a>
-M
fO
_C"
o
CO
o
Q-
X
X
CO
o oo
C-
4-* oC
O)
a.
X
X
X
X
X
00
I
r '
r
s:
r^
OJ
O)
00
X
X
co
E
O
r
4-1
ro
i.
O)
a.
0
s_
S-
ro
o-
X
X
"t
o
rO
4
E
ro
21
S
a>
N
i
r~
i
4J
$
OJ
u.
X
X
X
/
co
a
,
OJ
c~
00
4
^
E
rO
OJ
Q_
X
co
E
ro
r
Q-
S_
re
D
o^
X
X
CO
"£
(O
i^
a.
4-^
E
cu
E
a
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(/I
1
r
i
sr
cz
1
rO
0
X
X
X
X
X
T"
a
E
i
CO
CO
OJ
O
0
s_
Q-
CD
4-^
r~
X
3
ro
CD
X
X
cr
.^
4 *
(O
a>
in
o
ro
d
00
X
X
X
X
en
c:
i^
i-
03
~~
-1
oO
C3
r
-------
Ill .D. MAJOR SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION WITHIN STATES
to
GJ
to
to
OJ
(_>
o!
3- ₯\ r_ ;
ro
r
r
1
D^j
c:
,
o
^j\ r~
C re
C -r- IZ
Oi-C
to
c;
CO
1
^_
CD
OJ
1 c
J
. ! 0 OJ 4-> j Z: El
1_ C3 f~-
j i- 0 -:->
P CQ|
c
CJ ' CLi
C. LO|
U1
H CJ CO CJ O ^ C73|i
i- +-> 3 ct: u 3 J-!-,
cr/
CH
2
.r !
O'
5^-
__^
i1
(_>
(o
^"~ i
ra o
^
'- |Z ^3 ^
o|s- o
C. 0 .C
CD > ^^J OO
C1
j
i
C/!
1 CJ C"
! o| c:
ro r2v- c~ "^:-^
r;1 rci i- O QJ OlS" T-, CL.| ' : ^; ; rz
ca
"oj° Vo £; 'o oo
r- CO -ii E: i_
i^z o c:
u_ c- c^: '-C
X
X
X
X
i
X
1
1
1
GJ
X
X
X
X
^.*...-^l
r~ ^^
Oj! £ -*->
Sil
v
A
v
A
X
-t_«j
4
OJ
U-j
,
X
^
1 1
S_ "P c:;,_ o^ul
IT; OJ'P X 0
n3 C-i EE ; fC , - ! « to
o 3 1 o ; i- '-, ~ i c^ ro
«>u
X
i rfUl
X
X
X
X
X
<
X
i
\
ix
|
i
<
i
1
i
*
/
\
X
4
j
nf'""*
49
-------
Ill .D. MAJOR SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION WITHIN STATES
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
1 S. Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
termont
Virginia
Washington
West Va.
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Flierto Rico
Vir. Islands
Amer . Samoa
i
in
QJ
oo
CO
cu
o
o
$_
a.
cO
r_
4->
oo
rs
"O
C
f i
X
£
X
X
X
X
-
o~*
f
c
<-
CO
CI
CJ
CD-
CD
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
b
4->
fCS
si
ro
4-1
r
3
a.
00
c
03
S_
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
cr
cz
'1
"o
^J
s
4->
ra
00
<
X
X
X
X
cr
c:
i
"O
c:
re
-
cu
r~
O
+->
00
oa
t>
o
Di
X
X
I
1
00
a
-0
'
r
Si
OO
^
0.'
."^
~
0
0
X
X
X
|tO
o
-I-1
I'TJ
CO
1^-^
1
c
-r-
;
fZi
<
*""
X
X
X
I
c-
1Z
*l
t-
_0
"^
-o
o
_o
X
X
X
X
X
C/t
cz
o
c
0
4-)
4~"
0
0
X
c~
o
-)J
i"C3
^
0
CJj
r
a
0
Q-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1
1
C"
i1'.
/r-
1 ~
'~
1 lljl
*
a
u_
x
X
X
X
1
i 0 CO
i i-
,f-i o3
01
a.
X
X
X
X.
X
00
<
r-
"^~~
1
QJ
CJ
+>
C/)
X
X
C/)
^
O
4-J
n3
CU
O
>
s_
b
'0
o-
X
Tp
^;
-^
CJ
ro
<4-
^5
i p3
i;~
1
J^
1 .XI
I -1
l
1'->
cTj
Ll_
X
X
1 ""
1
i
1
1
! tr
! -'
O
;r
ig
!co
i j_i
2
ra
o
c^
-r"
1
i
! (/"
i^
II
ic"-
i
S_
1"-
X
ra
ca
|
jcr
1 c:
i
*.
+J
ro
CJ
; ^-
,.
0
(J
ro
0
CO
~^-v
i
i
^
! c
1^
1 ^
r
U_
i f'
ro
C5
i
50
-------
III. E. Air Quality Surveillance
States are required to place an air quality surveillance
system, utilizing various kinds of monitoring equipment, in operation
no later than two years after the approval of their implementation
plans.
The following tabulation is the best currently available
estimate of the amount of air pollution monitoring equipment in
operation in each State. This information was obtained from a
special analysis* which wherever possible, used data contained
in the initial January 1972 formal submission of State implementation
plans. In those instances where there was insufficient or unclear
reporting, other sources of information were used and have been
footnoted. Since States are continually increasing their surveillance
capabilities, it is to be expected that there is, in most instances,
more equipment in operation today than at the time when the plans
were submitted or when previous inventories were made. However,
this fact is not critical to the purpose of the tabulations on
the following pages, which is to give some idea as to the impact
of the Federal air surveillance requirements on the States in
terms of added equipment needs and to provide a national summary.
The minimum requirements upon which the needs are based are
those called for in the operation of a surveillance system for
monitoring pollutants within an air quality control region as
specified in Federal regulations for the preparation and submission
of State implementation plans.** The numbers and types of equipment
are based on the pollutant priority classification and population
of each region.
It is important to note that it was not possible to make
an individual determination of instrument ownership within each
AQCR within each State. Therefore, some AQCR's may possess more
than the required number of instruments while others have less.
Likewise additional items of equipment may be necessary to provide
adequate emergency episode monitoring capabilities or for purposes
of special or selected sampling needs.
Table III.E.2. indicates the general cost range of various
individual items of monitoring equipment and the cumulative national
cost based on the needs reflected in the above tabulation using
the median price range. Each item is listed at today's prices and is
subject to change.
*The Impact of State implementation Plan Requirements on Selected
Air Pollution Monitoring Instrument Manufacturers; Walter W.
Kovalick, Jr., April 13, 1972
**Federa1 Register, Volume 36, Page 15486, August 14, 1971
51
-------
III.E.I Required & Existing Equipment for
Air Quality Monitoring
POIIUTANT SUSPFNDFD' PARTICULAR SULFUR DIOXIDE CARBON MONOX'lDE PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDANTS NITROGEN DIOXIDE
MONITOR , Hiqh Volume
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado (1 )
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.(l)
Florida (2)(3)
Georgia
Hawai i
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana (2)
Maine
Maryland (3)
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina^)
N. Dakota
*R
43
11
21
18
64
29
23
7
8
33
55
3
18
ea
58
43
39
40
9
14
33
50
36
29
18
3b
13
12
14
12
24
21
/4
b3
6
*E
61
6
33
20
70
88
60
LJ4
7
87
39
7
34
114
91
31
34
65
24
6
57
46
80
22
17
68
7
29
34
25
50
42
230
116
15
*N
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
16
0
0
0
0
12
5
0
0
8
0
4
0
L7
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tape
R
15
1
8
4
22
9
10
?
3
13
17
1
3
19
17
9
9
10
3
3
15
22
n
11
6
15
3
3
3
3
8
3
28
17
2
F
b
0
7
2
0
16
39
14
7
6
5
1
]
22
24
1
1
17
5
0
20
12
1
b8
0
Ib
1
3
2
(J
22
2
4/
29
1
M
10
1
1
2
22
0
o
0
0
7
12
0
2
0
0
8
8
0
0
3
0
10
10
0
6
0
2
0
1
3
0
1
U
u
1
Bubblers
R
18
6
17
7
15
10
17
5
fi
19
3?
1
8
47
40
16
7
20
6
12
28
35
23
19
n
13
n
6
7
10
19
14
41
10
2
b
1
1
4
3
24
1
19
10
0
21
11
5
5
30
43
4
8
b8
5
b
21
46
b
Ib
1
b
2
1
6
4
0
6
b
4/
1
N
17
5
13
4
0
9--
0
0-
6
0
21
0
3
17
0
12
0-
0
1
/
/
0
I/
4
10
/
9
b
1
b
19
8
3b
U
1
Cont.
R
5
1
6
0
?
1
6
?
2
6
11
0
2
20
13
2
P
5
1
4
10
13
10
6
3
4
3
1
2
3
' 7
3
20
1
.0
L
0
0
7
0
16
2
6
14
3
13
3
1
b
25
18
1
0
10
15
2
21
8
Ib
/
0
i
2
0
0
0
21
3
4b
'i
0
N
b
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
3
0
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
Continuous
R
3
1
.4
0
28
3
6
. 2
2
0
o -
0
1
12
5
0
2
0
0
0
7
6
0
4
0
6
0
0
1
0
7
1
15
0
0
E
0
0
2
0
41
1
. 2
4
2
4
3
1
1
9
0
1
3
3
0
0
n
3
0
4
0
10
0
0
1
0
22
2
22
4
0
N
3
1
2
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
Continuous
R
5
0
4
1
32
3
6
2
2
5
1
0
0
12
7
2
4
3
' 1
0
7
6
1
0
4
6
0
0
1
0
5
3
21
2
0
E
0
0
2
0
68
1
2
4
1
4
1
V
1
6
0
1
1
4
0
. 0
10
3
0
3
0
9
0
1
2
0
4
0
9
5
0
N
5
0
2
1
0
2
4
0
1
1
0
0
o
6
7
1
3
0
1
0
0
3
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
12
0
0
Bubblers
R
0
0
13
3
20
0
19
6
8
20
17
0
5
21
26
3
0
14
0
0
20
36
25
10
. 3
_JLD
0
7
6
0
22
0
40
0
0
E
0
0
4
0
0
0
2
14
2
13
6
5
5
3
37
1
3
51
5
0
8
41
6
9
0
10
0
1
5
1
0
6
7
123
0
N
0
0
9
3
20
0
17
0
6
7
n
0
0
18
0
2
0
0
0
o
12
0
19
1
3
0
6
1
0
0
33
0
0
on
DO
* R - Required (minimum) E - Existing N - Needed
-------
III.E.I Required & Existing Equipment for
Air Quality Monitoring
MONITOR High Volume
State
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utan
Vermont
Vi rginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico(l )
Virgin Islands
Amer. Samoa
TOTAL
R
89
?R-
23
/b
1U
4U
b
4b
b/
13
b
b!
3b
34
34
/
1
4
4
1
1598
E
202
79
64
107
18
55
2
92
142
8
7
73
71
34
71
6
0
1
6
0
2767
N
0
0
0
0
0
U
4
U-
U
b
0
U
0 .
U
U
1
1
3
0
!
80
Tape
R
__3i
R
10
36
4
9
1
Ib
21
4
2
18
14
5
12
2
0
1
1
0
524
E
1?
?
5
29
0
3
0
4
3
5
1
11
18
18
0
0
0
0
1
U
499
N
21
5
5
7
4
b
.[
11
18
0
1
7
0
0
12
2
U
1
U
U
211
Bubblers
R
Sfi
fl
7
32
7
19
4
20
40
11
6
?R
14
16
14
3
3
3
3
1
853
E
W
a
5
0
18
20
0
b
b2
4
1
23
0
13
2/
1
0
0
2
0
540
N
21
n
2
32
0
U
4
15
0
7
b
5
14
3
U
2
3
3
1
1
362
Cont.
R
''n
n
i
'15
2
4
0
6
14
3
?
9
4
3
' 3
0
1
1
1
U
264
E
n
n
1
28
0
2
0
3
0
5
2
2
21
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
351
N
7
0
0
0
2
2
0
3
14
0
0
7
0
2
3
0
1
1
I
0
75
Continuous
R.
n
n '
3
12
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
"0
149
E
4
3
3
19
0
0
0
4
0
4
1
3
9
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
208
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
Continuous
R
17
4
3
12
0
1
0
5
20
2
0
7
5
0
4
0
U
0
U
.0
226
E
*
?
2
19
0
0
0
4
0
4
1
4
7
3
13
0
0
0
0
0
207
N
1?
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
20
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98
Bubblers
R
47
n
0
50
10
0
0
13
17
9
0
27
10
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
547
E
32
n
0
0
18
0
0
16
0
4
0
20
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
463
N
15
0 _.
0
50
0
0
0
0
17
5
0
7
10
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
299
Ol
(1) The 1969 Inventory of Air Pollution Monitoring Equipment operated by State and Local Agencies was used to partially or fully
estimate existing network.
(2) Raw data from the Annual Survey of Air Pollution Monitoring, July 1, 1969 - June 30, 1970 was used where possible.
(3) Based on consistencies in available data, certain assumptions were made regarding existing equipment in one or more AQCR's.
-------
III. E. 2.
COST OF NEEDED EQUIPMENT**
Type of Equipment
Hi-Volume Sampler
Tape Sampler
S02 Bubbler
S02 Continuous
CO Continuous
Oxidant Continuous
N02 Bubbler
TOTAL
Cost Range
Number Needed per Item
80
211
362
75
29
98
299
$ 150 -
$ 400 -
$ 300 -
$1 ,500 -
$1 ,700 -
$3,000 -
$ 300 -
$ 500*
$1 ,000*
$ 800
$5,700*
$4,500*
$5,240*
$ 800
Cumulative
Median Cost
$ 26,000
$148,000
$199,000
$270,000
$ 90,000
$404,000
$164,000
$1,301,000
*Higher figure is with reader and recorder
**Based on Field Operations Guide for Automatic Air Monitoring Equipment,
EPA, November 1971, and equipment company catalogs
54
-------
III. F. Status of Implementation Plans
The following tabulation lists the status of the
submission of State implementation plans required by
the Clean Air Act of 1970 for the implementation, main-
tenance and enforcement of national ambient air quality
standards within each air quality control region/or
portion thereof, within a State.
Such plans were due by January 30, 1972, nine months
after EPA promulgated standards,* for the following
pollutants:
1. Sulfur Oxide 4. Photochemical oxidents
2. Particulate matter 5. Hydrocarbons
3. Carbon Monoxide 6. Nitrogen Dioxide
An additional period of not to exceed 18 months may
be allowed for the adoption and submittal of that portion
of a plan relating to implementation of secondary ambient
air quality standards. State plans must provide for
attainment of national primary ambient air quality standards
within 3 years after the date of EPA approval of such plans,
except that a 2-year extension of this deadline may be
granted by the Administrator upon application by a Governor.
A request for such an extension must be based upon the inability
of one or more emission sources (or classes of moving sources) to
comply with the requirements of the State plan to achieve a primary
standard. It must demonstrate that presently available or planned
control technology or other reasonable alternative control techniques
will not enable the standards to be achieved within the three year
time period.
State plans must provide for attainment of national secondary
ambient air quality standards within a reasonable time. Within 4
months from the date that State plans are required to be submitted,
the Administrator must approve or disapprove such plans or portions
thereof. The Administrator must propose and promulgate regulations
(substitute plans) for those plans, or portions of plans, which he
does not approve unless, prior to such promulgation, a State adopts
and submits a plan or a revision of a plan that meets the Federal
requirements. Where necessary, proposed regulations have been
published for all but 3 States whose plans were not approved.
Considerable technical assistance was provided by each of
the ten EPA Regional Offices to the States in preparing their plan
and/or in providing financial support for contractual development
of all or portions of the plan. Information is as of July 31, 1972.
*See Section I.F. Significant EPA Actions Affecting State Programs.
55
-------
III. F. STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
B.C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
I Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Date Elan
Submitted
1/28
U/23
1/31
1/31
2/28
1/28
3/3
1/28
1/28
1/28
1/27
2/1
1/30
2/3
2/1
1/26
1/31
2/15
1/28
1/31
1/28
1/31
1/31
1/31
2/U
|_ Approved
5/31
-SHHi-
-;«HS-
5/31
5/31
###
5/31
Extension Requested*
2 years for San Francisco Bay
Area; Sacramento ; Southern Coast
18 months for New Jersey-New
York Connecticut; Hartford-
New Haven-Springfield
2 years for Tampa; Miami
18 months Hawaii
18 months E. Wash-No. Idaho;
2 years; E. Wash. -No. Idaho;
2 years State
18 Mo. Chicago; Indianapolis
2 years Chicago; Indianapolis
Louisville
2 years Dubuque; Omaha-Council
Bluffs
2 years for Kansas City
18 months for Baltimore
2 years for Baltimore; Nat .11
Capitol
18 months Boston - 2 yrs. Boston
2 years for Minneapolis-
St. Paul
How Prepared
State
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
State/EPA/Cont . ##
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
State/EPA
X
X
18 months (to submit plan for attaining
secondary standards)
-x-ftContractual support provided
SHHi-Promulgation of EPA regulations not necessary
July 31, 1972
-------
CTA TCT
0 1 A 1 C.
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
1
Date Plan
Submitted
1/28
3/1
1/28
1/31
1/27
1/31
1/31
1/28
1/26
1/27
1/31
J./28
1/28
1/28
1/31
1/28
1/31
1/28
1/28
1/28
1/27
1/28
1/28
1/28
Approved
5/31
5/31
5/31
7/27
5/31
-3BBS-
5/31
Extension Requested
2 years for Kansas City; St. Louis
2 years for Omaha-Council Bluffs
18 months for New Jersey-New York-
Connecticut; Philadelphia
2 years for New Jersey-New York-
Connecticut; Philadelphia
18 months Buffalo; New Jersey-New
York-Connecticut
18 months Cleveland
2 years Dayton; Toledo; Cleveland;
Cincinnati; Columbus
18 months for Philadelphia;
Pittsburgh
2 years for Pittsburgh
j
2 years for Houston; Corpus Christ-
San Antonio
2 years for State Capitol; Hampton
Roads
2 years for Spokane; Puget Sound
state
X
X
X
X
X
How Prepared
State/EEA/Cont . -*
X
X
X
X
X
X
y
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
'
3 State/EPA
X
|
1
i
|
X
1
j
1
X
X
July 31, 1972
-------
State
Wisconsin
Wyomi ng
Guam
Puerto Rico
Vir. Islands
Amer. Samoa
Date Plan
Submitted
1/31
1/31
1/28
1/31
1/31
2/1
Approved
5/31
5/31
5/31
Extension Requested
How Prepared
State
State/EBA/Cont.*-*
X
X
State/EPA
X
X
X
X
July 31, 1972
01
00
-------
III. G. Priority I Air Quality
Control Regions
Table 1 reflects the number of air quality
control regions classified as Priority I within
each State on a pollutant by pollutant basis
and the population residing therein. These regions
exceed national primary ambient air quality standard
for a given pollutant which, allowing for an adequate
margin of safety, is necessary for the protection
of public health.
All of the population residing within a
Priority I AQCR may not be continuously subjected
to air which exceeds the primary standard. Persons
living in outlying areas of a region furtherest
from pollutant sources may breathe air of a better
quality than those living closer to such sources.
However, assuming these individuals must travel and
work thoughout the region, they ultimately will be
exposed to the lower quality air.
Table 2 provides the percentage of the population
of each State residing within Priority I regions for
each pollutant. It is possible that from time to time
there will be changes in the regional classifications
as methods for determining the presence of pollutant
concentrations in the ambient air become more
sophisticated and indicate that reclassifications are
necessary.
59
-------
PRIORITY I AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGIONS
(Population in thousands)* -
>i,1i(>
\ \ «i h'UiM
U.. . i ^
,1 \ K i\
*\ i \ " * t \ 1 ~\
\ 1 | !- t M 1 «1
'\rk 1 VV » i " '
nl
. V
11 i M " i H 'i
1 Oi 1 ^1«'
itoor'i i v*
HtUsM 1 1
1 j .|,.»
1 UtUlO
1 1 1 inois
1 nd i i ti 1
1 ( 1 1 1 | »t II *1
1 d \\\l 1
1 UWti
k 1 1U' 'i <
[\ti 1 1 .MI r>
Kou lucky
I ou i s i iUut
M i i n»\
I 1 v\ 1 T 11
Maryland
M < n «
1 M :> 3 i
Michiyan
Minnesota
Miss
1 I 1 O -J *
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevad^
New Hamp.
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. C.
N. D.
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pehria.
Rh. Island
S. C.
S. D.
Tenn.
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Va.
Wisconsin
Wyoming
P. Rico
Amer . Samoa
Guam
Vir. Isds.
loial
Jdjinns
'/
A
f
4
;
f
| 1
}l
4
'}
1
I
(,
<)
1
1
4
11
10
12
7
9
3
5
6
6
6
7
4
5
5
4
3
3
4
8
8
8
2
14
8
5
6
1
10
4
6
12
3
2
7
6
10
8
3
1
1
1
1
Part. Pop.
S 2930
2 213
4 1773
1 48
3 11764'
4 1922
2 2506
1 386
1 746
3 3036
7 3645
0 0
3 529
7 9251
8 4108
7 2022
6 I960
5 1689
0 0
3 903
3 3470
5 5539
3 4659
2 2190
2 1213
3 3550
2 318
1 453
3 482
2 653
3 6546
4 579
4 15525
6 3811
0 0
9 8679
2 1511
1 1452
6 11676
1 922
5 1456
0 0
6 3834
4 3588
2 901
0 0
6 3915
4 2870
6 1004
3 1942
0 0
1 2690
0 0
0 0
1 63
SO v Pop.
2X 1UM
1 41
4 1773
0 0
0 0
1 37
2 2506
1 386
1 746
2 1947
3 2458
0 0
2 310
5 9064
6 3749
1 90
0 0
1 668
1 2760
2 564
3 3470
4 4902
3 4659
2 2458
1 1178
1 1815
2 304
0 0
2 332
2 653
3 6879
3 240
2 12782
0 0
0 0
5 5065
0 0
1 1452
2 6680
1 922
2 419
0 0
2 1377
5 4372
2 901
o o
Z 1 258
3 2b59
2 186
1 500
0 0
1 2690
0 0
0 0
1 63
CO Pop.
1 1018
1 69
2 1519
0 0
5 18324
1 1237
2 2506
1 386
1 746
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 112
2 7672
2 1729
0 0
1 455
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 3261
2 2864
0 0
1 1865
0 0
2 2757
0 0
0 0
1 270
0 0
3 6879
1 124
2 12782
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1452
2 6680
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 366
1 53
0 0
1 911
3 2559
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NO? Pop.
0 0
0 0
3 1684
1 48
3 15,495
1 37
2 2506
1 386
1 746
2 3851
2 2111
0 0
0 0
3 7694
4 1892
2 219
0 0
2 955
0 0
0 0
2 3261
4 4521
3 6591
1 1865
1 35
1 1815
0 0
1 453
1 270
0 0
3 6546
1 78
3 13,884
0 0
0 0
5 7406
0 0
0 0
5 10725
1 922
0 0
0 0
2 962
3 5401
2 901
0 0
3 2650
1 1907
0 0
2 1791
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ov fHC)
2 1423
0 0
2 1519
1 48
7 19229
1 1237
2 2506
1 386
1 746
2 1572
1 195
0 0
0 0
2 7672
4 1892
1 665
2 1019
2 955
1 2760
0 0
2 3261
2 2864
1 118
0 0
2 1213
2 2757
0 0
0 0
1 270
0 0
2 6328
2 463
4 15077
1 862
0 0
5 7406
2 1511
1 1452
2 6680
0 0
1 184
0 0
2 1755
7 8419
1 848
o o
3 2650
2 2156
0 0
1 1743
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
* Based on 1970 County Census figures correct to the nearest thousand
60
-------
III.G.2. PERCENTAGE OF (TOTAL) STATE POPULATION RESIDING WITHIN PRIORITY I REGIONS
FOR EACH POLLUTANT
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Miss i ssippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Haiopshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N , Oa ro I i na
N. Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pemif^y 1 vania
Kh. Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont:
VirjjJnjn
Washington
West Vir^Jnia
Wisc.oii;; i n
Ifyom i u^
Giuim
I'ucrl'o Rico
VJr. (.;!, -inds
Amur, tinman
* Based on 197
TOTAL *
pnPiiiATinw PARTICULATE
3373 86 %
296 , 71
1773 100
1887 : 2
19717 59
2178 ; 88
2989 83
543 71
746 100
6671 45
4493 i 8
749 0
693 ! 70
10981 84
5144 79
2829
2220
71
88
3136 j 53
3560
1093
3929
5688
8778
3768
2163
4637
682
I46/
482
724
7097
1010
18008
4844
610
10518 -
2489
2056
11676
922
2515
663
3834
1§998
1060
437
4543
3358
1652
4366
328
87
2690
63
28
0
82
88
97
53
58
56
76
46
30
100
90
92
57
86
77
0
82
60
70
100
100
57
0
180
32
85
0
86
85
60
44
0
0
100
inn '
n
sov
32"%
10
100
0
0
1
83
71
100
29
54
0
44
82
73
3
0
21
77
52
88
86
53
65
54
39
44
0
68
90
97
?3
7D
n
0
48
0
70
57
100
16
0
35
39
85
0
28
76
'1
11
0
0
100
100
0
CO
30 %
23
85
N02 i Ox (HC)
0%
0
94
0 2
92 /«
56 1
83 ; 83
71 71
100 | 100
0
0
0
16
69
JJ
u
20
0
0
0
82
50
0
49
0
59
0
0
56
0
97
12
70
0
0
0
0
70
57
0
0
0
0
3
5
0
2U
76
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
57
46
0
U
70
36
7
0
30
0
0
82
79
75
4-9
1
39
0
30
56
0
92
8
77
0
0
70
0
0
91
100
0
0
25
49
85
0
58
56
0
41
0
0
0
0
0
42 1"
0
85
2
97
56
83
71
100
23
4
n
n
69
36
23
dfi
30
77
0
82
50
1
0
56
59
0
0
56
0
89
45
83
17
0
70
60
70
57
0
7
0
45
76
80
0
58
64
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0 County Census figures correct to the nearest thousand el
-------
III. H. CALCULATED ESTIMATES OF EMISSIONS FOR
SELECTED POLLUTANTS
The following table presents, on a State by State
basis, calculated emission estimates for 1968 for five
major pollutants: particulate matter, sulfur oxide,
carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide and hydrocarbons.
The estimates are not actual measured pollutant
emissions within each State, as this information is
impossible to obtain.
The estimates were obtained by applying average
emission factors to published data on fuel consumption,
vehicle travel, solid waste disposal and industrial
production. One of the principal differences between
the totals in this table and those of an earlier nation-
wide report was the previous omission of a miscellaneous
category which included emissions from such sources as
forest fires, structural fires, coal refuse burning
and agricultural burning.
By early 1973, EPA will have completed a more
comprehensive State by State emission inventory based
upon information provided by the States and actual surveys
by personnel of the Office of Air Programs. This
inventory will include the four territories not currently
included and will separate the District of Columbia
from Maryland.
62
-------
III. H. 1968
CALCULATED ESTIMATES OF EMISSIONS
FOR SELECTED POLLUTANTS
(thousands metric tons)
(Annual Emissions)
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland &
D. C.
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Particulates
680
19
53
89
580
260
70
33
290
240
15
50
1400
1600
220
160
440
160
40
620
110
1200
310
100
260
64
93
15
20
170
69
1100
270
84
sox
540
22
2600
40
710
69
310
120
790
410
58
270
2800
1800
360
140
900
360
80
660
690
1400
420
92
760
900
36
250
63
1000
280
1800
440
56
CO
1900
100
1100
1300
11000
1200
1400
330
3400
2700
260
430
5400
3100
1600
1500
1600
2900
550
2000
2300 '
4600
2000
1200
2600
500
890
350
370
3400
1100
6200
2700
350
NOX
330
19
98
130
1200
150
190
45
470
330
38
43
860
520
220
180
290
300
66
290
340
660
260
150
340
i- *}
53
1 f\f\
100
A f$
42
*5 r\
39
480
98
930
380
cr\
Dl)
Hydrocarbons
430
28
200
300
2800
280
330
99
800
600
69
97
1400
800
380
410
410
O£" n
860
120
500
560
1100
490
320
630
1 +i f\
130
f*i f\r\
220
f\ *%
83
X *j
93
990
310
1500
610
no
92
63
-------
STATE
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Particulates
2200
73
80
2500
22
110
57
360
560
140
5
220
130
500
210
20
SOX
2800
240
48
1900
71
85
14
970
1100
680
5
250
500
820
340
46
CO
5600
1800
1200
5500
400
1400
390
2100
10000
610
170
2400
1800
960
2000
320
NOX
900
170
120
800
47
140
37
340
910
79
19
290
180
230
240
42
Hydrocarbons
1400
470
280
1400
93
320
90
490
3000
160
54
550
450
240
500
98
Total
18071
31095 108970 14235
27636
64
-------
III. I. Tax Incentives
The following table indicates the various
tax incentives offered by the States to encourage
industry to construct treatment facilities to
control air pollution.
As may be seen in the summary, 24 States
provide for property tax exemptions; 14 States
provide a sales and use tax exemption; 6 States
allow franchise or income tax credits; and 8 States
offer a franchise or income tax deduction.
65
-------
III. I. INCENTIVES FOR INDUSTRY
STATE PROPERTY TAX
EXEMPTION
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawai i
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
X
_
_
X
_
_
X
X
X
X
X
X
_
-
-
-
-
X
X
X
-
X
_
_
X
X
_
X
X
_
X
X
X
X
-
X
_
_
X
X
X
SALES AND USE TAX FRANCHISE OR FRANCHISE OR
EXEMPTION INCOME TAX INCOME TAX
CREDIT DEDUCTION
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
x
X
x x
X
66
-------
III. J. TRANSPORTATION CONTROLS
Most of the control techniques presented in the
Air Quality Implementation Plans submitted by the
States are designed to abate pollutants at the source.
Among these are emission control devices on automobiles,
fuel switching procedures during air pollution episode
emergencies, electrostatic precipitators, scrubbers in
stacks, and similar strategies and devices to reduce
pollutants before they reach the air.
The following table shows which States have
included in their implementation plan, information on
strategies for reducing emissions from motor vehicles
by some means in addition to the reductions afforded
by the Federal vehicle pollution control program, and
gives an indication as to the general type of control
strategies being considered. In almost every case
the control strategy has been related only to certain,
regions in the State where additional emission reductions
are deemed necessary. In many instances, final details
of the transportation control strategy have not been
provided in the implementation plan. States will be
required to submit detailed transportation control
plans and schedules for implementation at the time of
their first semiannual progress report in mid-February
1973.
Transportation controls strategies have been
summarized into the following categories:
Traffic control: this includes such actions as
converting to one-way streets, use of express lanes,
and graduated tolls depending on the number of passengers,
Parking restrictions: includes such things as
banning on-street parking, increasing parking fees,
and graduating parking fees according to the number
of passengers.
67
-------
Retrofit systems: requiring the installation
of devices or systems on older cars to reduce their
emissions.
Testing and Inspection: testing for emissions or
inspecting to ensure that installed control systems are
operating properly.
Gaseous Fuel Systems: requiring fleets, such as
taxis, government fleets, or a large company fleet, to
convert to a fuel system such as LPG, or liquid
natural gas.
Improve public transportation: either by improving
present systems, or going to new systems.
Work Schedule Changes: staggering working hours
to reduce traffic volume at any given time and, thus,
speed traffic flow. This may also be accomplished in
conjunction with instituting a four day work week
Land Use Controls: includes considerations
relating to the siting of highways, parking areas, and other
land areas likely to involve dense traffic concentrations
having substantial impact on community air quality.
68
-------
III. J.
TRANSPORTATION CONTROLS
State/Region
Arizona
Phoenix-Tucson
California
South Coast
San Francisco
Bay Area
San Diego
San Joaguin
Sacramento
Colorado
Denver
D.C.
All
Illinois
Chicago
Maryland
Baltimore s D . C .
Massachusetts
Boston
Minnesota
St. Paul
Nevada
Clark-Mohave-Yuma
New Jersey
All
New York
NY-NJ-Conn .
Ohio
Dayton
Traffic
Controls
P
P
A
P
C
P
P
C
C
C
A
C
Testing Gaseous
Parking Retrofit and Fuel
Restrictions Systems Inspection Systems
C P P
P A P P
P A P P
P A P P
P P
P P
P P
p P P
P
C C C C
p p
C C
p p
A
C C
C C C
Improve
Public Work
Transporta- Schedule
tion Changes
C
P P
A P
P P
C
P
C C
P
C C
A
C
C
Land
Use
Controls
P
P
P
C
C - Considered
P - Proposed
A - Adopted
-------
TRANSPORTATION CONTROLS (Cont.)
State/Region
Oregon
Portland
Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Texas
All
Utah
Wasatch Front
Virginia
D.C.
Washington
Puget Sound
Spokane
Wisconsin
Milwaukee
Traffic
Controls
C
C
C
P
C
Testing
Parking Retrofit and
Restrictions Systems Inspection
C C
P
C
C
C
P
Improve
Gaseous Public Work Land
Fuel Transporta- Schedule Use
Systems tion Changes Controls
C C
C
C - Considered
P - Proposed
A - Adopted
-------
III. K. REQUESTS FOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
This table reflects the various kinds of
technical assistance requested by State and
local agencies from the Air and Water Programs
Division in each of the ten EPA Regional Offices.
It points out some of the more major areas
of activity performed by State and local programs
during FY 1972 and an indication as to where
regional program efforts were being directed.
71
-------
III. K. State Requests for Assistance from EPA Regions
FY 1972
STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D. C.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
03
P
03
Q
X
'H
H
c5^
rH
H
X
X
X
X
X
X
to
CD
g-
H
B
o
CD
o
fH
p
g
u
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
g
H
-p
H
CO
H
|
03
P
W
X
X
X
X
X
CO
1
H
p.
w
1
bo
CD
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
p
Pi
>
1 1
.3
t/1
to
H
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
to
CD
H
p
'H
&
4_)
u
03
CD
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CO
p
Pi
CD
-p
03
p
co
-p
o
Oj
1 1
X
X
X
X
Pi
p-t
o
H
p
oi
-p
fl
1
53
rH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
bo
H
t _.
o
-p
H
1
1
H
-P
o3
P
g
rH
-P
CO
Pi
h 1
X
X
X
X
X
X
00
.a
a
rH
OH
CD
CO
^"^
X
p
d
orceme:
a
w
1
rH
bO
CD
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-p
o
I
1 1
u
H
bO
O
rH
O
JH
O
CD
-P
S
X
X
X
d
p
CO
t/1
B
d
03
N
X
-^^
CD
ourc
CO
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
c5
-p
CO
p
H
CD
CM
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
'g
.H
-p
g
o
m
rt
i i
o
H
rH
X
X
X
X
^ i
4H
03
-p
CO
O
-p
Pi
1
H
j3
u
CD
X
X
X
(/)
d.
0
H
-P
03
j \
1
X
X
1C
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
s
o3
(D
CO
CD
et
X
X
P!°
H
rH
Pn
CO
CD
U
fH
B
CO
X
X
X
X
, ^
J^
-p
CO
H
CD
H
J3
P
CO
rH
o3
H
U
CD
X
X
X
r-\
CD
P
03
+->
CO
0
|M
CM
rf
d
H
03
X
rH
O
f-l
+J
Pi
o
o
PI
o
H
-P
n3
-P
a
[/i
1
X
X
X
X
X
LIST OF
SPECIAL STUDIES*
* Fugitive Dust Study
^Fugitive Dust Study
Trans. Control Stratej
for State Imp. Plans
Helena Valley SO
Study x
^Sequence Fuel Burning
72
-------
III. K. State Requests for Assistance from EPA Regions
FY 1972
STATE
Idaho "
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
rt
~i
^>^
u
H
M
cci
H
CX
v_<
H
^
X
X
X
X
X
J
U)
(D
cr
H
J3
O
CD
--H
i-H
0
f-x
-p
pi
0
u
X
X
X
X
V
-A
V
J
X
0
H
-P
H
CO
H
j^5
cr
o3
p
cti
o
X
X
v
A
sodes
H
-Q
^-^
0
lt
o
to
p
o
h3
X
X
X
X
X
X
>
o
p
d
P-i
i i
d
o
H
CO
to
I/)
0
H
H
p
u
<^
,-H
"
f^-t
0
r T f~J
CT.'
43
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
>
X
X
o
-*
X
X
X
»
X
r-*
O
s
f^
rH
^
o
H
p -p
-*
p
TTt
PI
4-J
L>
C-~
^
<
X
X
X
O
o
£-.
to
c
H
o
-P
? i
^
1
o
rH
4-J
'
p
^
b
C'j O
E '"'i
1 11"
4j
'ft
o
r^_
j'l
J
CO
~?
LO
^
^
o
-p
5
-3
>-: r-\
P ±, ' CC.
C -J
oip d
"3 '
£_,
J-l
y)
^1 i r"
,
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
"-<
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1
X
X
o
r^> Cj
r i
i } ; ^
'^J
Q
o
*"* ! ^ r .h-j
H o" o
X
--±
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
j
^
p
^
5
X
X
X
o
P
to
00
p
1 H
ation
F=
O
r^
h i
o
H
^- : '
^
O
^
X
X
X
X
_;
j^
X
X
-H
LJ
c*}
P
-M
O
-P
r^
q
-P
^5
-H
U
o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C/)
r^
o
rH
4->
i
*^3
^/;
O
r^1
-H
X
X
X
X
X
X
-C
o
rrj
CD
0
X
X
d
H
-H
E-1
c3
00
o
u
3
o
^
K
-p
10
H
/)
H
3
LO
r 1
H
U
£U
O-(
CO
X
X
"-1
j
fl
j~^
i
H
Ui
O
H
~^ t
DC
^
H
~*
H
fj
1
X
X
^
^_l
o
H
-J
3
3
H
P
fj
J
H
o
"1
n
^j
^
-H
X
X
LIST OF
SPECIAL STUDIES*
Indepth Agency
Evaluation
Development of HC
control strategy
"contract)
73
-------
III. K. State Requests for Assistance from EPA Regions
FY 1972
STATE
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
rt
P
03
X
P
H
rH
rt
5-
fH
H
<
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
in
CD
cr
rH
JB
CJ
0
rH
0
^L>
H
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pi
o
H
p
H
CO
H
^
&
rt
p
rj"!
Q
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CO
§
o
H
T "j
s^
U
Pi
o
be
r4
0
^
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
Pi
CD
^
j 1
rjj
o
H
co
to
H
pt
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
0
H
p
H
H
p
U
rH
nj
fH
0
75
PH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
p
Pi
53
p
cd
p
CO
p
U
ri
g
X
X
X
X
Pi
rt
rH
OH
O
H
P
J
P
Pi
O
§
rH
P.
rH
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
M
Pi
H
o
p
H
Pi
.9
P;
o
p
rt
p
CD
"".rl
£J
P
co
Pi
i i
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
b/j
pi
i
rH
i
CD
to
^
Ti
Cv}
"H
X
p
Pi
0
a
U
,O
-U
TJ
\J
cd
bC
0
X
X
X
X
X
X
p
£_(
o
P-
PH
3
rH
rt
U
H
CO
o
1 I
o
0
o
p
0
5£
X
X
X
X
to
-d
p
CO
co
-j
O
N
^
0
U
^3
o
CO
5
0
X
X
X
X
|
00
tx^
CO
P
H
c~
p
^0
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pi
o
H
p
2
,0
a
i i
o
H
rH
^£}
^3
d.
X
X
X
X
X
1 1 1
m
cd
P
CO
1H
O
P
Pi
0
ff~
P
H
^
CJ
0
X
X
X
X
X
(/)
ri
0
H
p
rH
p
Eo
0
PH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
s*
U
%
0
oo
0
erf
X
X
Wj
S
H
rH
PH
^~
c3
LO
0
U
rH
d
o
in
X
X
X
X
X
X
, >
K
p
if)
H
0
H
d
P
CO
rH
H
O
0
Cl
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
/ \
0
p
c<3
p
5£
1
fe
o
f_l
^
oy>
fl
H
H
c3
^
-H
X
X
X
X
rH
o
£ <
p
P!
0
CJ
f1
o
H
P
c3
P
r-H
O
P-
Pi
Cv5
H
^ I
X
X
LIST OF
SPECIAL STUDIES*
Prog. Eval. Springfie!
§ State; Eval. Follow
up Kansas City, MO.
* Fugitive Dust Study
CO levels in truck
cabs
Sources of particulate
EPA/N. Mex. Joint
Study to define emis.-
sion factor: for fugi-
tive dust (roads , " con-
struction, etc.)
Sources of particulate
74
-------
III. K. State Requests for Assistance from EPA Regions
FY 1972
STATE
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
03
Q
X,
J
H
, (
Q
5
^5^
-i
H
<
r
A
X
V
-y
V
^
X
X
D
H
3
-H
o
1)
i 1
rH
O
_J
^H
O
O
r
A
X
x
x
X
X
!C
3
H
J
H
CO
H
"^
0"
<^
OS
P
^5
C)
X
X
r
X
X
X
CO
CD
d
o
CO
H
Q,
!-£-]
J>^
O
fl
CD
c{
J_i
o
r^
-3
T;
X
V
A.
X
X
(
H
o
3
-^
f 4
^
0
H
/)
CO
H
3
X
V
.A
x1
X
X
X
X
J.
5
ities
H
P
O
^
r i
oj
rH
0>
-d
CD
WH
\
>
(
co
4->
S
CD
§
-P
rt
P
C/}
P
U
£
1
O
H
-p
03
4-1
PJ
O
C-^
S
rH
fix CU
S
i i
^
^
X
X
X
X
£
V
A.
IT
K
1C
X
X
X
bO
H
J^
0
H
_q
o
H
4->
rt
P
r^
CJ
r-^
' J
^H
-P
10
1 1
X
X
X
\
<
{
*
X
X
X
to
S
re
i
a,
CD
i/i
1 j
^
4-)
rt
CD
O
rH
O
1
T3
fl
ra
rH
-1 ^j
i^
-3
X
CD
T
X
X
y
A
X
>
>
X
4-1
^
a
p:
rH
03
o
H
G£
0
r-t
O
O
O
4->
_O
X
X
'
X
T3
-O
to
o
03
tsl
rt
'-^
CD
U
"j
O
C/3
*>
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
iS
^)
LO
j>^
-O
4-J
H
^
^
O
On
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3
H
^
D
-H
^
! i
U
H
rH
Cj
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
-H
-H
+->
-0
-H
O
4-J
r-1
o
r^
-l~l
H
^5
fn
U
0
X
X
X
X
X
X
CO
d
o
H
4-1
^
rH
H
c£
^G
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
r~<
u
rj
0
CO
o
^
bO
H
H
*^_,
±
C3
o
o
H
o
X
X
X
. ^
Li
co
H
-^
G
H
d
D
_j
fj
i
-3
_)
G
-^
X
x
X
X
_^
0
03
+J
-0
o'
CH
tc
?M
H
2j
-)
i-^
H
'
X
i
o
3
3
H
4-1
r^
.3
^
O
Q_,
cn
i
d
(
^
X
X
X
LIST OF
SPECIAL STUDIES*
ntend to particulate
in EPA/N.Mex. dust stu
Indepth Agency
Evaluation
Development of HC § NO.,,
Control strategies
Indepth Agency
Evaluation
iy
75
-------
III. K. State Requests for Assistance from EPA Regions
FY 1972
STATE
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoi.iing
Amer . Samoa
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
cd
Cd
Q
X
4->
H
iH
H
^y
^
H
<
X
X
X
00
CD
D'
H
Pj
£
CD
r-t
O
[H
J->
PJ
0
C_J
X
X
X
P!
o
H
4-1
H
00
H
^5
r^-1
c^f
cd
p
cd
Q
K
X
CD
*T3
O
00
H
o t
i ~i
S^
U
Pi
CD
00
f-i
CD
u3
X
X
K
X
^
o
p
Pi
CD
&
1 1
£}
O
H
00
to
H
M
X
X
*
X
X
X
to
o
H
-P
rH
^>
H
-P
O
rH
cd
CD
O
UH
X
X
to
4->
Pi
CD
f-
3
4-1
cd
co
4->
U
cd
P^
^
X
X
PI
cd
(X
Pi
O
H
4->
cd
4~>
Pi
O
S
rH
£~^H
^1
fH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
bO
Pi
H
^
O
P
H
Pi
Pi
O
H
) i
cd
4-1
r-*
%
^J
4J
00
1 I
X
X
X
X
X
bo
Pi
H
G
pi
< |
P-i
CD
to
' }
13
c\j
1
4->
Pi
CD
(J
.p
i-4
01
""C^
rt
C^
i t
cti
b£
0)
x,
X
X
p
^
o
p.
p
CO
rH
cd
O
H
bo
O
rH
O
o
o
4->
CD
2
X
X
X
CO
d
4-1
CO
LO
n>
o
c3
N
Cu
^H
~^^^
CJ
o
^3
O
CO
^
,0
X
tL",
CJ
J.J
j/1
LO
4-J
H
pi
£H
CD
EX
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pi
0
H
-p
cd
r^
p
o
U_j
Pi
i i
U
H
rH
O
* '
$-
X
X
t4_J
-H
cd
-p
CO
M-H
o
4-1
Pi
CD
g
-P
H
^3
£_(
O
0
Pi
X
X
X
X
to
f-H
o
H
4-1
c3
rH
*~5
CO
CD
ei
X
X
X
X
X
f-Cj
o
5i
cd
CD
[/)
O
^
b^
^
H
> 4
£--
P
c'3
CO
CD
U
("<
^
O
CO
^ N
.'<
4-1
to
H
to
CD
H
""O
^i
4--1
CO
rH
cd
H
CJ
CD
p'
CO
^
CD
4-1
cd
4-1
CO
'
fd
JH
bO
O
M
EX
bO
Pi
H
Pi
H
cd
f-i
r-1
X-'
X
rH
O
£.4
4-J
Pi
O
U
Pi
o
H
4-1
cd
41
£_!
0
£X
CO
C
j_(
f"1
LIST OF
SPECIAL STUDIES*
SUMMARY OF STATE REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE
Air Quality Data 31 Meteorological Support 15
Control Techniques 35 New Source/Hazardous Stds . . 20
Data Aquisition 24 Permit System 33
Emergency Episodes 35 Public Information 19
Emission Inventory 43 Recruitment of Staff 25
Federal Activities 23 Regulations . 41
Impact Statements 13 Research fi
Implementation Plan
Instrumentation/Mon
Land Use Planning
5
itoring. .4
i_>
Legal and Enforcement
0 Source Sampling
1 Sneci al Studi e.s
13
_lfi
. 4 Training Program (State)... 11
3
0 Transportation Control
13
76
-------
APPENDIX
A. List of Local Air Pollution Control Agencies
by State
B. Clean Air Act Excerpts
Section 105
Section 106
C. Control Agency Function Descriptions
D. Titles and Definitions of Standard State
Control Positions
E. New Air Training Courses Planned for FY 1973
F. Regional Office Addresses
77
-------
APPENDIX A
LOCAL AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCIES
ALABAMA
Air Pollution Control Department
City of Huntsville
P.O. Box 308
Huntsville, AL 35804
Jefferson County Dept. of Health
1912 Eighth Avenue, South
Birmingham, AL 35202
Mobile County Board of Health
248 Cox Street
Mobile, AL 36601
ALASKA
Cook-Inlet Air Res. Mgmt. District
c/o Greater Anchorage Area Borough
Pouch 6-650
Anchorage, AK 99502
Environmental Services Division
Fairbanks North Star Borough
Box 1267; Fairbanks, AK 99707
ARIZONA
Greenlee-Graham County
P.O. Box 1475
Clifton, AZ 85533
Maricopa County Dept. of Health
1825 East Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85006
Pima County Air Pollution
Control District
151 West Congress
Tucson, AZ 85701
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
Bay Area Air Pollution
Control District
939 Ellis Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Alma County Air Pollution Control Dist.
RFD, Gadersville, NV 89410
Amador County
P.O. Box 1058
Pine Grove, CA
Butte County Air Pollution Control Dist,
P.O. Box 1229
Oroville, CA 95965
Calveras County Air Pollution
Control District
Calveras County Health Department
Government Center
San Andreas, CA 95249
Colusa County Air Pollution
Control District
546 Jay
Colusa, CA 95932
Del Norte County Air Pollution Control
District
2850 Cold Springs Road
Placerville, CA 95667
Fresno County Public Health Department
515 South Cedar
Fresno, CA 93702
Glenn County Air Pollution
Control District
Memorial Building
Willows, CA 95988
Humboldt County Air Pollution
Control District
5630 South Broadway
Eureka, CA 95501
Imperial County Air Pollution
Control District
935 Broadway
El Centre, CA 92243
Inyo County Air Pollution Control Dist.
P.O. Box 218
Independence, CA 93526
78
-------
CALIFORNIA Cont.
Kern County Air Pollution
Control District
P.O. Box 997
St. Bakersfield, CA 93302
Kings County Air Pollution
Control District
1221 West Lacey
Hanford, CA 93230
Lake County Air Pollution
Control District
Rt. #1, Box 315C
Kelsyville, CA 95451
Lassen County Air Pollution
Control Dist.
175 Russell Avenue
Susanville, CA 96130
Los Angeles County Air
Pollution Control District
434 South San Pedro Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Madera County Air Pollution
Control District
216 West Sixth Street
Madera, CA 93637
Mariposa County Air Pollution
Control District
P.O. Box 5
Mariposa, CA 95338
Mendocino County Air Pollution
Control District
Courthouse
Ukiah, CA 95182
Merced County Department of
Public Health
240 East 15th Street
Merced, CA 05340
Modoc County Air Pollution
Control District
Box 1091
Arturas, CA 96101
Monterey-Santa Cruz County Unified
Air Pollution Control District
P.O. Box 487
Salinas, CA 93901
Mono County Air Pollution Control Dist.
Courthouse
Bridgeport, CA 93517
Nevada County Air Pollution Control Dist.
P.O. Box 294
Nevada City, CA 95959
Orange County Air Pollution Control Dist.
1010 S. Harbor Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92805
Placer County Air Pollution Control Dist.
County Health Department
P.O. Box 749
Auburn, CA 95603
Plumas County Health Department
P.O. Box 480
Quincy, CA 95971
Riverside County Air Pollution
Control District
3575 llth Street Mall
Riverside, CA 92501
Air Pollution Control District
Sacramento County Health Department
2221 Stockton Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95817
San Benito County Air Pollution
Control District
172 West Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92101
San Joaquin County Air Pollution District
1601 East Hazelton Street
Stockton, CA 95201
79
-------
CALIFORNIA Cont.
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution
Control District
P.O. Box 1489
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution
Control District
4440 Calle Real
Santa Barbara, CA 93105
Shasta County Air Pollution
Control District
2650 Hospital Lane
Redding, CA 96001
Siskiyou County Air Pollution
Control District
Courthouse Annex
Yreka, CA 96097
Stanislaus County Air Pollution
Control District
820 Scenic Drive
Modesto, CA 95350
Sierra County Air Pollution
Control District
County Court House
Downieville, CA 95936
Sutter County Air Pollution
Control District
142 Garden Highway
Yuba, CA 95991
San Brindino Air Pollution
Control District
172 West 3rd St.
San Brindino, CA 92401
Tehama County Air Pollution
Contro Board
P.O. Box 250
Red Bluff, CA 96080
Tulare County Air Pollution
Control District
County Civic Center
Visalia, CA 03277
Truty County Air Pollution Control Dist.
P.O. Box AK
Weaverville, CA 96093
Tuolumme County Air Pollution Control Dist.
9 N. Washington Street
Senora, CA 95370
Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District
735 East Santa Barbara Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Yolo-Solano Air Pollution Control Dist.
P.O. Box 1157
Woodland, CA 95695
Yuba County Air Pollution
Control District
1420 "I" Street
Marysville, CA 95901
COLORADO
Tri-County District Health Dept.
4857 South Broadway
Englewood, CO 80110
Boulder City-County Health Dept.
3450 Broadway
Boulder, CO 80302
Air Pollution Control Agency
Department of Health & Hospitals
City-County of Denver
W 8th Ave. & Cherokee Streets
Denver, CO 80204
El Paso City-County Health Dept.
712 South Tegon
Colorado Springs, CO 80902
Jefferson County Health Dept.
260 South Kipling
Lakewood, CO 80226
Larimer County Health Dept.
County Court House
200 West Oak Street
Fort Collins, CO 80521
80
-------
COLORADO Cont.
Las Animas-Huerfano Counties
District Health Department
P.O. Box 791
Walsenburg, CO 81089
Mesa County Dept. of Public Health
515 Patterson
Grand Junction, CO 81501
/
Pueblo City-County Health Dept.
151 Central Main
Pueblo, CO 81003
Weld County Health Department
1555 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
CONNECTICUT
Air Pollution Control Bureau
Office of Humane Affairs
City of Bridgeport
835 Washington Avenue
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Fairfield Health Department
Town Hall
Fairfield, CT 06430
Greewich Health Department
Town Hall Annex
Greenwich, CT 06830
Dept. of Health
Stoddard Municipal Bldg.
165 Miller Street
Meriden, CT 06450
Middletown Health Dept.
Dekoven Drive
Middletown, CT 06457
Dept. of Environmental Health
Eels Hill Annex
Milford, CT 06460
New Britain Health Department
27 West Maine Street
New Britain, CT 06051
Bureau of Environmental Health
New Haven Health Department
One State Street
New Haven, CT 06511
Department of Health
137-139 East Avenue
Norwalk, CT 06824
Stamford Health Department
229 North Street
Stamford, CT 06901
Department of Health
Town Hall
Stratford, CT 06497
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
Broward County Air & Water
Pollution Control Board
540 S.E. Third Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Bio-Environmental Services Div.
Dept. of Health, Welfare, and
Bio-Environmental Services
6925 Evergreen Avenue
Jacksonville, FL 32208
Hillsborough County Pollution
Control Commission
906 Jackson Street
Tampa, FL 33602
Manatee County Air & Water Pollution
Control Department
202 Sixth Avenue, East
Bradenton, FL 33505
81
-------
Metro Bade County Pollution
Control Department
864 N.W. 23rd Street
Miami, FL 33127
Environmental Control Board
Palm Beach County Courthouse
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Pinellas County Health Dept.
500 Seventh Avenue South
St. Petersburg, FL 33721
Sarasota County Health Dept.
P.O. Box 2658
Sarasota, FL 33578
GEORGIA
Fulton County Health Dept.
99 Butler Street, S.E.
Atlanta, GA 30303
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
Bedford Park Air Pollution Control
Board
6700 78th Avenue
Bedford Park, IL 60501
c/o Argo, IL Post Office
Bensenville Pollution Control
Department
700 West Irving Park Road
Bensenville, IL 60106
City of Chicago
Dept. of Environmental Control
320 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60610
Crystal Lake Pollution Control
Department
121 North Main Street
Crystal Lake, IL 60014
Cook County Environmental
Control Bureau
Chicago Civic Center, Room 309
Chicago, IL 60602
East St. Louis Air Pollution Control
7 Collinsville Avenue
East St. Louis, IL 62201
Air Pollution Control Division
Department of Inspections & Permits
828 Davis Street
Evanston, IL 60204
Air Pollution Control Board
Granite City
2301 Adams St.
Granite City, IL 62040
Village of McCook
Air Pollution Control Board
50th and Glencoe Avenue
McCook, IL 60525
Quad City Area Regional Air Pollution
Control Agency
1504 Third Avenue
Rock Island, IL 61201
Will County Health Department
510 Ella Avenue
Joliet, IL 60433
INDIANA
Air Pollution Control Department
Water Pollution Plant
Moss Island Road
Anderson, IN 46012
Dept. of Air Quality Control
4525 Indianapolis Blvd.
East Chicago, IN 46812
Air Pollution Control Dept.
City of Evansville
Administration Bldg., Rm 207
Evansville, IN 47708
Air Pollution Control Division
City of Gary
3600 West Third Avenue
Gary, IN 46406
Dept. of Air Pollution Control
5925 Calumet Avenue
Hammond, IN 46320
82
-------
INDIANA Cont.
Bureau of Air Pollution Control
Dept. of Public Works
Room 2401 City-County Building
200 E. Washington St.
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Lake County Health Department
209 West Joliet Street
Crown Point, IN 46307
Air Pollution Control Division
100 West Sixth Street
Michigan City, IN 46360
Division of Pollution Control
St. Joseph County Health Department
1419 South Michigan Street
South Bend, IN 46613
Division of Air Pollution Control
Vigo County Health Department
120 South Seventh Street
Terre Haute, IN 47807
Wayne County Health Department
Courthouse Room 113
Richmond, IN 47374
IOWA
Linn County Health Department
445 First Street, S.W.
Cedar Rapids, IW 52404
Des Moines-Polk County Health Dept.
East First Street & Des Moines Street
Des Moines, IW 503109
KANSAS
Kansas City-Wyandotte County
Department of Health
619 Ann Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Wichita-Sedgwick County
Department of Community Health
1900 East 9th Street
Wichita, KS 67203
KENTUCKY
Air Pollution Control District
of Jefferson County
2500 S. Third Street
Louisville, KY 40202
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
Allegany County Health Dept.
P.O. Box 690
111 Union Street
Cumberland, MD 21502
Air Quality Control Section
Div. of Environmental Health
Anne Arundel County
Department of Health
101 South Street
Annapolis, MD 21401
Division of Air Pollution Control
Bureau of Industrial Hygiene
Baltimore City Health Department
Maryland Avenue & Hillan Road
Baltimore, MD 21202
Baltimore County Dept. of Health
Maryland Avenue
Towson, MD 21204
Frederick County Health Dept.
Air Quality Control Section
12 East Church Street
Frederick, MD 21701
Howard County Health Department
P.O. Box 476
Ellicott City, MD 21043
83
-------
MARYLAND Cont.
Montgomery County Dept.
of Environmental Protection
County Office Building
Rockville, MD 20850
Prince Georges County Health
Department
Cheverly, MD 20715
MASSACHUSETTS
Berkshire Air Pollution Control
District
1414 State Street
Springfield, MA 01009
Air Pollution Control Commission
Quincy Market Building, Room 84
Boston, MA 02109
Central Mass. Air Pollution Control
District
City Hall, Room 404
Worcester, MA 01608
Fitchburg Board of Health
City Hall, Room 17
Fitchburg, MA 01420
Merrimack Valley Air Pollution
Control District
600 Washington Street
Boston, MA 02111
Metro Boston Air Pollution Control
District
600 Washington Street
Boston, MA 02111
Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control
District
1414 State Street
Springfield, MA 01109
Southeastern Mass. Air Poll.
Control District
Lakeville Hospital
Lakeville, MA 02346
Air Pollution Control Division
Worcester Dept. of Public Health
455 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01608
MICHIGAN
Flint Air Pollution Control Division
1100 South Saginaw Street
Flint, MI 48502
City of Grand Rapids
City Hall, Room 403
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Macomb County Health Dept.
43525 Elizabeth Road
Mt. Clemens, MI 48043
Air Pollution Control Section
Muskegon County Health Dept.
County Building
Terrace Street
Muskegon, MI 49440
Wayne County Air Pollution
Control Division
Wayne County Health Dept.
1311 East Jefferson Street
Detroit, MI 48207
MINNESOTA
Dept. of Environmental Services
2215 West Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, MN 55431
Air Pollution Control Division
Department of Inspections
220 Grain Exchange
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Olmsted County Health Dept.
415 Fourth Street, S.E.
Rochester, MN 55901
Richfield Health Department
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
84
-------
MINNESOTA Cont.
St. Cloud Health Department
111 South Fourth Avenue
St. Cloud, MN 56301
St. Louis County Health Dept.
504 East Second Street
Duluth, MN 55805
St. Louis Park Health Dept.
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Air Pollution Control Division
Public Utilities Dept.
100 East 10th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
Greene County-City of Springfield
Air Pollution Control Authority
940 Boonville
Springfield, MO 65802
Independence Health Department
210 South Main Street
Independence, MO 64050
Kansas City Health Department
City Hall, 21st Floor
Kansas City, MO 64106
Division of Air Pollution Control
City Hall, Room 419
St. Louis, MO 63103
Division of Air Pollution Control
St. Louis County Health Department
801 South Brentwood Blvd.
Clayton, MO 63105
MONTANA
Cascade County Air Pollution Control Prog.
City-County Health Department
1130 17th Avenue, South
Great Falls, MT 59401
Missoula City-County Health Department
301 Courthouse Annex
Missoula, MT 59801
NEBRASKA
Lincoln-Lancaster County Air Pollution
Control Agency
Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Dept.
2200 St. Marys Avenue
Lincoln, NB 68502
City of Omaha
Public Safety Department
Permits & Inspection Division
108 South 18th Street
Omaha, NB 68102
NEVADA
District Health Department of
Clark County
625 Shadow Lane
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Washoe County District Health Dept.
10 Kirman Avenue
Reno, NV 89502
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
Central Jersey Regional Air Pollution
Control Agency
655 Ambey Avenue
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
Department of Health, Welfare, and
Housing
Billings-Laurel-Yellowstone County Air 60 West Scott Place
Pollution Control Program Elizabeth, NJ 07201
3302 2nd Avenue, North
Billings, MT 59103
Hudson Municipal Air Pollution
Commission
532 Summit Avenue
Jersey City, NJ 07306
85
-------
NEW JERSEY Cont.
Suburban Air Pollution Comm.
49 Mt. Pleasant Avenue
West Orange, NJ 07052
NEW MEXICO
Albuquerque Department of
Environmental Health
Box 1293
Albuquerque, NM 87103
NEW YORK
Albany County Health Department
South Ferry and Green Streets
Albany, NY 12201
Chemung County Health Dept.
John Street-Heritage Park
Elmira, NY 14901
Columbia County Dept. rf Health
363 Allen Street
Hudson, NY 12534
Erie County Dept. of Health
95 Franklin Street
Buffalo, NY 14202
Monroe County Department of Health
111 Westfall Road
Rochester, NY 14602
Bureau of Air Pollution Control
Division of Environmental Health
240 Old Country Road
Mineola, NY 11501
Department of Public Health
30 Church Street
New Rochelle, NY 10805
Department of Air Resources
Environmental Protection Admin.
51 Astor Place
New York, NY 10038
Interstate Sanitation Commission
10 Columbus Circle
New York, NY 10019
Division of Environmental Health Services
Niagara County Health Department
525 Bewley Building
Lockport, NY 14094
Division of Environmental Sanitation
Onondaga County Dept. of Health
300 South Geddes Street
Syracuse, NY 13204
Rensselaer County Dept. of Health
Division of Environmental Hygiene
Seventh Ave. & State Street
Troy, NY 12181
Rockland County Dept. of Health
50 Samsondale Plaza
West Haverstraw, NY 10993
Suffolk County Department of
Environmental Control
1324 Motor Parkway
Hauppauge, NY 11787
Westchester County Department
Of Health
County Office Building
Martine Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601
NORTH CAROLINA
Unifour Air Pollution Control Prog.
County Office Building
Newton, NC 28658
Western N.C. Regional Air
Pollution Control Agency
P.O. Box 7607
Courthouse
Asheville, NC 28807
Air Pollution Control Center
Cleveland County Health Dept.
315 Grove Street
Shelby, NC 28150
86
-------
NORTH CAROLINA Cont.
Cumberland County Health Dept.
515 Person Street
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Durham County Air Pollution
Control Agency
300 East Main Street
Durham, NC 27701
Division of Air Pollution Control
1313 Chesapeake Avenue
Columbus, OH 48212
Lake County Combined General
Health District
121 Liberty Street
Painsville, OH 44077
Forsyth County Board of Commissioners Dept. of Air Pollution Control
206 Government Circle
Third & Maine Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Gaston County Health Department
Box 819
Gastonia, NC 28502
329 10th Street
Lorain, OH 44052
Middletown Division of Air
Pollution Control
1240 Central Avenue
Middletown, OH 45042
Guilford County Dept. of Public Health Montgomery County Health Dept.
300 East Northwood Street 6175 West Third Street
Greensboro, NC 27401 Dayton, OH 45427
Mecklenburg County Health Dept.
1200 Elythe Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28203
Rowan County Health Department
1216 West Innes Street
Salisbury, NC 28144
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
Air Pollution Control
177 South Broadway
Akron, OH 44308
Air Pollution Control Division
Canton City Health Department
City Hall, Second Floor
Canton, OH 44702
Division of Air Pollution Control
2400 Beekman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45214
Division of Air Pollution Control
Department of Public Health
and Welfare
2735 Broadway Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44115
Portsmouth City Health Dept.
740 Second Street
Portsmouth, OH 45662
Department of Health
City of Mansfield
600 West Third Street
Mansfield, OH 44906
Steubenville Air Quality Region
City Annex Building
308 Market Street
Steubenville, OH 43952
Pollution Control Agency
26 Main Street
Toledo, OH 43605
Wood-Lucas County Air Pollution Agency
541 West Wooster Street
Bowling Green, OH 43402
Youngstown Air Pollution Control Agency
7 West Federal Street
Youngstown, OH 44503
87
-------
OKLAHOMA
PUERTO RICO
Air Quality Control Division
Okla. City-County Health Dept.
921 N.E. 23rd St.
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
Tulsa City-County Health Department
4616 East 15th Street
Tulsa, OK 74112
OREGON
Columbia-Willamette Air Pollution
Authority
1010 N.E. Couch Street
Portland, OR 97232
Lane Regional Air Pollution
Authority
Route 1, Box 739
Eugene, OR 97402
Mid-Willamette Valley Air
Pollution Authority
2585 State Street
Salem, OR 97301
PENNSYLVANIA
Allegeny County Health Dept.
Bureau of Air Pollution Control
301 39th Street, Bldg. #7
Pittsburgh, PA 15204
Air Pollution Control Board of
Greater York
757 West Market Street
York, PA 17404
Lehigh Valley Air Pollution
Control District
1516 Main Street
Northampton, PA 18067
Air Management Services
Phila. Department of Public Health
1701 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
Charleston County Council
County Office Bldg.
2 Courthouse Square
Charleston, SC 29401
Building & Inspection Dept.
City of Columbia
City Hall
1737 Main Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Greenville County Health Dept.
200 Unversity Ridge
Greenville, SC 29601
County Pollution Control Authority
County Court House
Spartanburg, SC 29301
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Air
Pollution Control Bureau
City Hall Annex, Room 201
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Knox County Air Pollution
Control Department
307 Locust Street
City Park Hall, Bldg. C
Knoxville, TN 39702
Memphis-Shelby County Health Dept.
814 Jefferson Avenue
Memphis, TN 38105
Metro Health Department of
Nashville & Davidson County
311 23rd Avenue, North
Nashvill, TN 37203
-------
TEXAS
VIRGINIA
Corpus Christi-Nueces County
Department of Health & Welfare
1811 N. Shoreline
Corpus Christ!, TX 78401
City of Dallas Health Dept.
1936 Amelia Court
Dallas, TX 75235
El Paso City-County Health Dept.
222 South Campbell
El Paso, TX 79901
City of Fort Worth
Department of Public Health
1800 University Blvd
Fort Worth, TX 76107
Galveston County Air Control Dept.
104 Fourth Street, South
Texas City, TX 77590
Houston City Health Dept.
Pollution Control Division
1115 North MacGregor Drive
Houston, TX 77025
Jefferson County Environmental
Control Department
1149 Pearl Street
Beaumont, TX 77701
Laredo-Webb County Health Dept.
2600 Cedar Avenue
Laredo, TX 78040
Lubbock City-County Health Dept.
1202 Jarvis Street
Lubbock, TX 79457
San Antonio Metro Health District
131 West Nueva Street
San Antonio, TX 78204
UTAH
VERMONT
Alexandria Health Department
517 N St. Asaph St.
Alexandria, VA 22314
Arlington County Bureau of
Environmental Health
1800 North Edison
Arlington, VA 22207
Fairfax County Health Dept.
4080 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax, VA 22030
Air Pollution Control Bureau
Department of Public Safety
501 North Ninth Street
Richmond, VA 23219
City of Roanoke
215 Church Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, VA
Roanoke County Health Dept.
510 S. College Ave.
Salem, VA 24153
VIRGIN ISLANDS
WASHINGTON
N.W. Air Pollution Authority
207 Pioneer Building
Second and Pine
Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Olympic Air Pollution Control
Authority
120 East State Avenue
Olympia, WA 98501
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control
Agency
410 West Harrison Street
Seattle, WA 98119
S.W. Air Pollution Control Authority
7601 N.E. Hazel Dell Avenue
Vancouver, WA 98665
89
-------
WASHINGTON Cont.
Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authority
North 811 Jefferson
Spokance, WA 99201
Yakima County Clean Air Authority
Yakima County Court House, Room 201
Yakima, WA 98901
WEST VIRGINIA
Wheeling Air Pollution Control Dept.
420 Hawley Bldg.
Main Street
Wheeling, WV 26003
WISCONSIN
City of Beloit
Department of Health
Municipal Center
Beloit, WI 53511
Air Pollution Committee
Board of Supervisors
Douglas County
Courthouse
Superior, WI 54880
Eau Claire City-County Health Dept.
414 East Grand Avenue
Eau Claire, WI 54701
City of Green Bay
100 North Jefferson
Green Bay, WI 54301
Madison Dept. of Public Health
507 City-County Building
Madison, WI 53709
Milwaukee County Dept. of Air
Pollution Control
9722 West Watertown
Plank Road
Milwaukee, WI 53226
Racine County Air Pollution
Control Department
730 Wisconsin Avenue
Racine, WI 53403
WYOMING
Laramie Environmental Commission
203 South Fourth Street
Laramie, WY 82070
90
-------
APPENDIX B
"GRANTS FOR SUPPORT OF AIR POLLUTION PLANNING AND
CONTROL PROGRAMS
"Sec. 105. (a)(l)(A) The Administrator may make grants
to_air pollution control agencies in an amount up to two-
thirds of the cost of planning, developing, establishing, or
improving, and up to one-half of the cost of maintaining,
programs for the prevention and control of air pollution or
implementation of national primary and secondary ambient air
quality standards.
"(B) Subject to subparagraph (C), the Administrator may
make grants to air pollution control agencies within the
meaning of paragraph (l)s (2), or (4) of section 302(b) in an
amount up to three-fourths of the cost of planning, developing,
establishing, or improving, and up to three-fifths of the
cost of maintaining, any program for the prevention and
control of air pollution or implementation of national primary
and secondary air quality standards in an area that includes
two or more municipalities, whether in the same or different
States.
"(C) With respect to any air quality control region or
portion thereof for which there is an applicable implementation
plan under section 110, grants under subparagraph (B) may be
made only to air pollution control agencies which have sub-
stantial responsibilities for carrying out such applicable
implementation plan."
"(2) Before approving any grant under this subsection
to any air pollution control agency within the meaning of
sections 302 (b)(2) and 302(b)(4) the Administrator shall
receive assurances that such agency provides for adequate
representation of appropriate State, interstate, local, and
(when appropriate) international, interests in the air quality
control region.
"(3) Before approving any planning grant under this sub-
section to any air oollutant control agency within the meaning
of sections 302(b)(2) and 302 (b)(4), the Administrator shall
receive assurances that such agency has the capability of
developing a comprehensive air quality plan for the air quality
control region, which plan shall include (when appropriate) a
recommended system of alerts to avert and reduce the risk of
91
-------
situations in which there may be imminent and serious
danger to the public health or welfare from air pollutants
and the various aspects relevant to the establishment of
air quality standards for such air quality control region,
including the concentration of industries, other commercial
establishments, population and naturally occurring factors
which shall affect such standards.
"(b) from the sums available for the purposes of
subsection (a) of this section for any fiscal year, the
Administrator shall from time to time make grants to air
pollution control agencies upon such terms and conditions
as the Administrator may find necessary to carry out the
purposes of this section. In establishing regulations for
the granting of such funds the Administrator shall, so far
as practicable, give due consideration to (1) the population,
(2) the extent of the actual or potential air pollution
problem, and (3) the financial need of the respective
agencies. No agency shall receive any grant under this
section during any fiscal year when its expenditures of
non-Federal funds for other than nonrecurrent expenditures
for air pollution control programs will be less than its
expenditures were for such programs during the preceding
fiscal year; and no agency shall receive any grant under
this section with respect to the maintenance of a program
for the prevention and control of air pollution unless the
Administrator is satisfied that such grant will be so used
as to supplement and, to the extent practicable, increase
the level of State, local, or other non-Federal funds that
would Tn the absence of such grant be made available for
the maintenance of such program, and will in no event
supplant such State, local, or other non-Federal funds.
No Grant shall be made under this section until the
Administrator has consulted with the appropriate official
as designated by the Governor or Governors of the State
or States affected.
"(c) Not more than 10 per centum of the total of
funds appropriated or allocated for the purposes of sub-
section (a) of this section shall be granted for air
pollution control programs in any one State. In the case
of a grant for a program in an area crossing State boundaries,
the Administrator shall determine the portion of such grant
that is chargeable to the percentage limitation under this
subsection for each State into which such area extends.
92
-------
"(d) The Administrator, with the concurrence of any
recipient of a grant under this section, may reduce the
payments to such recipient by the amount of the pay,
allowances, traveling expenses, and any other costs in
connection with the detail of any officer or employee to
the recipient under section 301 of this Act, when such
detail is for the convenience of, and at the request of,
such recipient and for the purpose of carrying out the
provisions of this Act. The amount by which such payments
have been reduced shall be available for payment of such
costs by the Administrator, but shall, for the purpose of
determining the amount of any grant to a recipient under
subsection (a) of this section, be deemed to have been
paid to such agency.
"INTERSTATE AIR QUALITY AGENCIES OR COMMISSIONS
"Sec. 106. For the purpose of developing implementation
plans for any interstate air quality control region designated
pursuant to section 107, the Administrator is authorized to
pay, for two years, up to 100 per centum of the air quality
planning program costs of any agency designated by the
Governors of the affected States, which agency shall be
capable of recommending to the Governors plans for imple-
mentation of national primary and secondary ambient air
quality standards and shall include representation from the
States and appropriate political subdivisions within the air
quality control region. After the initial two-year period
the Administrator is authorized to make grants to such agency
in an amount up to three-fourths of the air quality planning
program costs of such agency.
93
-------
APPENDIX C
CONTROL AGENCY FUNCTION DESCRIPTION
MANAGEMENT:
TECHNICAL
SERVICES:
A. Policy, public relations, intergovernmental
relations, and development of control strategies
and plans: These functions include the variety
of special activities required of an agency
director and his immediate staff in order to conduct
a meaningful and dynamic control program. As an
agency increases in size, specialists such as
systems analysts, public relations experts, and
technical writers may be involved. For small
agencies, these skills may be part of the duties
of major supervisors.
B. Administrative and clerical support: This
function includes budgeting, record keeping,
filing, typing, and related work, as normally
required to operate an agency. All clerical
staff of the agency are included in this category
for ease of tabulation.
C. Staff training: This function includes the
activities of training officers and supervisors
in providing on-the-job or formal group training.
A. Laboratory operations: This function includes all
preparatory and analytical laboratory activities
necessary to support source sampling, ambient air
monitoring, and special studies.
B. Operation of monitoring network. This function
relates to the routine servicing and operation of
all sampling and meteorological instruments deployed
in the field for continuous surveillance of air
quality and diffusion characteristics. The data
generated are used as input to diffusion models
for prediction of future air quality and the
development of control regulations; to determine
the effectiveness of agency operation in reducing
and/or preventing air pollution to forecast episode
conditions, and for public information and
education purposes.
C. Data processing: This function includes data
reduction, processing, and statistical treatment for
air sampling, meteorology, permit processing, emission
calculations, and development of inspection schedules.
D. Special studies: This function includes a
variety of special studies conducted for purposes
of locating sampling stations, determining con-
tribution of specific sources to ambient air pollution
levels, and determining need for new regulations.
D. Instrument calibration and maintenance: This
function includes those tasks performed to ensure the
proper operation of sampling, analytical, and
meteorological instruments operated by the agency.
94
-------
ENFORCEMENT
SERVICES:
ENGINEERING
SERVICES:
A. Scheduled inspections for permit renewal: This
function relates to the activities required of an
air pollution inspector to determine whether all
sources of pollution, operating under a permit are
in compliance with the terms of that permit. The
function includes travel time, inspection, and
report preparation.
B. Complaint-handling and field patrol: This
function includes the operation of a continuous
field patrol to enforce regulations on open
burning, visible emissions, odors, etc.
A. Calculation of emission estimates: This
function relates to the work done in estimating
emission rates from various sources and source
categories to provide information on program
effectiveness, potential future problems within
an agency's area of jurisdiction, location of
sampling stations, and need for new regulations.
B. Permit system: This function covers all the
work involved in reviewing plans for potential
new sources of air pollution; consultation with
builder, owner and/or other interested parties
to effect changes, where necessary, making
inspections to ensure that what is done conforms
to the plans; and appearing before hearing boards
to substantiate findings. It is assumed that
permits are issued to prevent pollution in a
comprehensive manner and that the system includes
an authority to construct and a permit to operate.
C. Development of control regulations, preparation
of technical reports on control and review of
industrial control plan for episodes: These
areas are generally project-oriented or considered
part-time responsibilities of the engineering staff.
95
-------
APPENDIX D
TITLES AND DEFINITIONS OF STANDARD
STATE CONTROL POSITIONS
DIRECTOR:
SUPERVISOR:
ENGINEER I:
ENGINEER II;
CHEMIST I:
Plans, organizes, and directs the professional,
administrative, and technical activities of an
air pollution control program; coordinates the
program with local, state, regional, federal,
and private agencies and organizations concerned
with air pollution and related environmental
activities; and evaluates program and personnel
effectiveness and initiates improvements.
Under the direction of the Director, with broad
technical latitude, is responsible for planning
a major segment of an air pollution control pro-
gram; coordinating it with other segments of the
program; supervising a professional, administra-
tive, and technical staff; and acting for the
Director as designated.
Under close supervision, makes beginning pro-
fessional engineering analyses and evaluations
of air pollution sources, problems, and assists
in the development of emission reduction
strategies; may assist in provision of professional
and technical advice; may participate in special
studies; may lead and assist in training program
personnel; learns to perform more difficult
engineering duties.
Under general supervision, with technical latitude,
performs professional engineering work in an office
or in the field; makes analyses and evaluations of
air pollution sources, problems, and permit plans;
calculates emission inventories and develops
emission control and reduction strategies and
emergency episode plans; provides professional and
technical advice; plans and conducts special studies;
assists in planning the air pollution control
program; leads and trains program personnel.
Under close supervision, performs standardized
chemical analyses of atmospheric contaminants;
assists in the development of analytical procedures
and measurement techniques; learns to perform more
difficult analyses and to provide professional and
technical advice on the chemistry of air pollution;
may participate in special studies; my lead and
assist in training program personnel.
96
-------
CHEMIST II:
METEOROLOGIST I:
METEOROLOGIST II:
SPECIALIST I:
SPECIALIST II:
Under general supervision, with technical latitude,
performs professional chemical analyses of atmos-
pheric contaminants; develops analytical procedures
and measurement techniques for laboratory and field
activities; rpovides professional and technical
advice; plans and conducts special studies; assists
in planning the air pollution control program; leads
and trains program personnel.
Under close supervision, performs beginning professional
meteorological analyses and evaluations of meteorological
and air pollution data; assists in the relation of
meteorological elements to air pollution problems and
preparation of periodic air quality forecasts; may
participate in special studies; may lead and assist
in the training of program personnel; learns to perform
more difficult meteorological duties.
Under general supervision, with technical latitude,
makes professional meteorological analysis and
evaluations of meteorological and air pollution data;
relates meteorological elements to air pollution
problems in control models; prepares periodic air
quality forecasts; recommends implementation and
termination of emergency episode plans; provides
professional and technical advice; plans and conducts
special studies; assists in planning the air
pollution control program; leads and trains program
personnel.
Under close supervision, makes beginning professional
level analyses and evaluations of air pollution sources,
problems and permit plans; assists in complex inspections
and investigations; assists in the development of
recommendations and in the conduct of negotiations for
improvement or modification of air pollutants conditions,
initiation of enforcement action and provision of
professional and technical advice; may participate in
special studies; may lead and assist in the training of
program personnel, learns to perform more difficult
professional level duties.
Under general supervision, with technical latitude,
functions as a professional-level program representative;
conducts complex inspections and investigations of
reported violations; analyzes and evaluates air
pollution sources, problems, and permit plans; develops
recommendations and negotiates improvements or corrective
actions; initiates enforcement actions; provides pro-
fessional and technical advice; plans and conducts
special studies; assists in planning the air pollution
control program; leads and trains program personnel.
97
-------
TECHNICIAN I:
TECHNICIAN II:
TECHNICIAN III
INSPECTOR I:
INSPECTOR II:
INSPECTOR III:
AIDE I:
AIDE II:
ADMINISTRATIVE:
CLERICAL: AND
OTHER
Under close supervision, following detailed directions,
performs routine technical tasks in laboratory, field
and shop; assists higher-level staff installing,
operating, calibrating and repairing a variety of
equipment and instruments used in the air pollution
control program; participates in training.
Under supervision, following general directions, installs,
calibrates, operates, modifies, maintains, and repairs
a variety of equipment and instruments used in the air
pollution control program; may assist professional staff
conducting special studies; and may lead and assist in
the training of lower-level staff.
Under general supervision, with technical latitude,
performs a broad range of technical duties of varying
complexity in the laboratory, shop, and field; assists
professional staff conducting special studies; and
leads and trains lower-level staff.
Under close supervision, following detailed directions,
performs routine field surveillance, facility and
equipment inspection, and, and complaint investigation
and learns to perform more responsible tasks by
observing and assisting higher-level staff and parti-
cipating in training.
Under supervision, following general technical directions,
performs field surveillance, facility and equipment
inspection, and complaint investigation; may assist pro-
fessional staff conducting special studies; and may
lead and assist in the training of lower-level staff.
Under general supervision, with technical latitude,
performs field surveillance, facility and equipment
inspection, and complaint investigation; assists
professional staff in conducting special studies;
and leads and trains lower-level staff.
Under close supervision, following detailed directions
serves as a helper to a higher-level employee and
learns to perform routine tasks.
Under close supervision, serves as a helper to
higher-level employees and learns to perform more
difficult tasks requiring some technical knowledge
and skill.
Includes any category not included in above occupational
categories.
98
-------
APPENDIX E
WEW COURSES FOR FISCAL yEAR 7973
^fr Quality Management Section
Env4Aonme.ntal Training Simulation (#454} (5 cku/,6]
Po££u£ion PAinctplu fioi PlanneAt, (#455) (3 day*)
Regional Planning fan MA Pollution (3 day*)
Control
-in PabLic. Commu.n4.cat4.on, (3 day&}
A Pollution (#457)
MA Pollution hdmi.nt>>3Aation 1 (#458} (3 day*}
MA Pollution kdxMjMJ* Station II (#459) (3 rfat/4)
MA Pollution kdmLnJu^tJwJu.on III (#460) (3 day*}
MA Pollution SyAtzm* Management (#461) (4 rfayi)
AXt PotJtution Agency Planning Sm-inaA (#462) (2 day*,)
S SuAveAllance. Se.c£ion
FOA ^uAtkeA Information c.onc.<2Aning tkui and oth^A
contact.: EnvJAonmnntal Pfiatzction Agency
ofi MA PitoQUami,
Manpower t?eve/opment
Aiangle. PaAk,
CaAolina 27711
MA Pollution MonttoAing Syi>tmt> (#463) (5 day*)
PolycycLic Otiganiu (#464)
MA Quality Standard* (#465) (10 day*)
99
-------
APPENDIX F
REGIONAL OFFICE AVVRESSES
REGION
Re.Q4.oncd AdmlnlAtAatoA, Reg-con I
U. S. Environmental Pfiottction Agency
John F. Kennedy federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Regional Admlnlf>tA.atoA., Re.g4.on 11
U. S. Env4A.otme.ntat Px.otc.cti.on Age.nct/
26 IFedcAal Plaza. Room 847
New York, W 10007
Re.Q-Lonai Admlnl&ttatoA., Re.g4.on 111
U. S. Environmental Px.ote.sitA.on Agency
6th & Walnut StAectA
Philadelphia, PA 19706
Re.Q4.onal AdmlnlAtAaAor, Re.g4.on IV
U. 5. Env4A.onme.ntal Protection Agency
1421 PeachtA.ee Street, W.E. Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30309
5TATES COVEREV
Regional Admi.'iii^tAaton, Re.Q4.on 0
U. S. Env4A.onme.ntal PA.ote.ction Agincy
One. Nosith WackeA. V/Uve.
Chicago, 11 60606
Regional AdmlnlitfiatoA., Re.glon I/I
U. 5. Env4A.onme.ntal PAote.c£lon Age.nc.y
1600 PatteAAon StA.e.e£
Valla*, TX 75201
Regional Admlnl&ttiatoA., Re.glon I/I I
U. S. Env4A.onme.ntal PAote.c.tlon Age.nct/
1735 Batt4jmoA.e. Avinae.
KanAOA City, MO 641 OS
Regional AdmlnlAtA.atoA., Region l/III
U. 5. Env4A.onme.ntal PA.ote.ct4.on Age.nc.y
Lincoln ToMeA Building, Su.Lte. 900
1860 Lincoln StA.e.zt
Ve.nveA, CO &Q203
Regional AdmlnldtAatoA., Region IX
U. 5. Env4A.ovme.ntal PA.ote.ctlon Agency
100 Cati&oAnla StAce^t
San FAanclbco, CA 94111
Regional Adml*il!>tA.atoA.t Re.glon X
U. 5. Env4A.om-ne.ntal PA.ote.ct4.on Agency
1200 6th Auenue
WA 9 SI 01
100
Maine.
MaAAa
Conne.ctlc.ut
Wew)
Rhode
Wew
(/4Agln
VoA.k
PueAt.0 Rico
Pennsylvania
Maryland V. C.
Wei I V&iglnla
Virginia.
Ke.ntu.cky
Tenner 4 ee
FloAlda
Ne.bA.aJ> ka
Montana
Wyoming
Colorado
\\OMOJil
Ne,vada
Arizona
Alabama
NoAth Carolina
South CaA-ollna
GeoAgla
Ohio Illinois
Minnesota. Michigan
Indiana
Oklahoma
Louisiana
New Mexico
Iowa
Ml&AOUAl
NoAth Vakota
South Vakota
Utah
Guam.
AmeA4.can Samoa
Idaho
Washington
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1972 514-149/82 1-3
------- |