EPA  NEW ENGLAND
       REGIONAL  LABDRATDRY
                                              ENVIRONMENTAL
                                                   SCIENCE  FACT  SHEET
  r ARTNERS
  RELATED
  PROGRAMS

  •EPA New England, Boston, MA
  •EPA Office of Research &
  Development, Cincinnati, OH
  •USGS
  •UMASS/Boston, Dept of Biology
  •UMASS/Amherst, Dept. of Civil
   Engineering
  •MA Dept. of Environmental
   Protection
  •MA Water Resource Authority
  •MA Dept. of Conservation &
   Recreation
 WONTACTS
  EPA New England Regional
  Laboratory
  11 Technology Dr.
  North Chelmsford, MA
  01863
  1(888) 372-7341 (in NE)
  1(617)918-8300
  www.epa.gov/ne/lab
               PnLYMERASE   CHAIN  REACTION
               I INTRODUCTION
              A/most one quarter of the  2,840 listed polluted waters of New England do not meet
              water quality  criteria for  bacteria.  Traditional microbial test methods limit state,
              federal and/or tribal  regulators' ability to  implement appropriate and timely control
              measures and/or to assess human health  risk. Traditional methods only identify and
              quantify fecal  pollution in  water.  New analytical tools are  needed to identify fecal
              pollution sources.  The polymerase chain reaction method is just such a tool, providing
              an  innovative way to assess microbial water pollution.

              The goal of this  method  is to  develop rapid, routine, and cost effective regional
              analytical capability  to discriminate  between fecal pollution sources in fresh and
              marine waters.  To meet this goal, the New England Regional Laboratory  (NERL) is
developing state-of-the-science rapid, quantitative, library-independent Real-Time Polymerase Chain
Reaction (PCR) methods to differentiate and  quantify human and non-human sources of fecal
pollution.

WHAT  is  PCR?
PCR  is a repetitive biochemical technique that  mimics the  natural cellular process of Deoxyribo-
nucleic Acid  (DNA) replication for synthesizing  copies of genetic material from either DNA or
Ribonucleic Acid (RNA).  DNA, present in  all organisms, whether plant or animal, is  made up  of
genes comprised  of unique sequences of nucleotide  bases.  These  unique base sequences are used
to identify a specific organism, a species or group of related species, or a particular strain within a
species.   In three cyclically repeating  steps, Denaturing,  Annealing, and  Extension, PCR
amplifies or makes  copies of targeted fragments of the DNA. After 30 to 40 of these repetitive
cycles, copying each of the  copies produced in  the previous cycle, millions  of copies  of the
replicated nucleic acid are  produced.

The product  of PCR is called amplicon and  Real-Time PCR meosures  the amount of amplicon
being copied by labeling the DNA  strands with  a  fluorescent marker and measuring,  in real time,
the change in  sample fluorescence as the copies are produced.

Each of the  three steps of the PCR  process is  controlled  by heating and/or cooling the PCR
reaction. EPA's Regional Lab currently  uses a  high-speed thermocycling  instrument,  controlling
the repetitive process  and both detecting  and  quantifying the targeted products of interest.

                                                                               continued D
  &EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency New England
901-F-03-004B
October 2004
www.epa.gov/ne/lab
                                      I printed on 100% recycled paper, with a
                                        of 50% post consumer waste, using vegetable based inks

-------
ENVIRONMENTAL   FDRENSICS
Like phenotypic tests where colored or sheening colonies grow on agar plates allowing identification and enumeration of bacteria,
genotypic PCR techniques amplify portions of gene sequences to  enable quantification and identification of the original DNA  from
a specific progenitor organism, or strain of an  organism. Thus, PCR allows analysts  to test whether or not samples contain  DNA
from known sources, asking questions such as "Is this the suspect's DNA?" or "Does this person have a specific disease?"  or "Is the
fecal pollution in a water sample from human waste?"
                                                                       PROGRESS  TO  DATE
                                                                       In 2003,  NERL  established  and validated three
                                                                       different Real-Time PCR techniques to analyze water
                                                                       samples from two urban beaches (Carson and
                                                                       Wb//aston) in Boston and Quincy, MA for bacterial
                                                                       indicators; a hydrolysis probe  technique  for £ coli,
                                                                       a  hybridization probe technique for £ coli, and a
                                                                       hybridization probe  technique for Enterococcus.

                                                                       These  ongoing Total Maximum  Daily Load-funded
                                                                       projects focused  on  removing PCR inhibitors  from
                                                                       environmental samples and rapid sample processing
                                                                       using NERL's DNA extraction and purification  ro-
                                                                       botic instrumentation.  The automation  enables
                                                                       relatively high sample  through-put and precise
                                                                       handling of environmental DNA samples as compared
                                                                       to manual sample processing techniques.

                                                                       WHAT'S  IN  THE  FUTURE
                                                                       Future efforts  will  build  upon  previous  PCR
                                                                       accomplishments to develop a  Real-Time PCR
                                                                       PRNA Coliphage quantitation and differentiation
                                                                       procedure.  Applied  research and  development in
                                 2004 will include field assessments conducted  primarily on  Charles River water samples col-
                                 lected between Waltham  and Boston, MA,  in dry and wet-weather conditions.  Viral PCR
                                 results will be compared to more traditional  membrane filtration and MPN techniques.

                                 MICROBIAL  SOURCE  TRACKING  BACKGROUND
                                 Bacteria/ F'Coliphage  viruses (BCV) are an excellent indicator of viral contamination in both
                                 marine and fresh waters  and can more effectively differentiate  between human and animal
                                 sources of fecal contamination than simple £  coli-  based techniques.  Application of NERL's
                                 BCV methods will determine simultaneously  the  relative contribution of human versus non-
                                 human fecal contamination from  different  sources and indicate the  potential for human viral
                                 pathogen contamination in water bodies.

                                 KEY  FACTOR
                                 Regulators must exercise  caution  when applying new methods to  environmental questions.
                                 Until now regulators have not had the ability to discriminate between specific sources of fecal
                                 pollution and must be careful to determine how best to  interpret the PCR signal derived from
                                 human and non-human pollution.   In addition  to developing these analytical techniques, the
                                 New England Regional Laboratory will work with its PCR program partners to learn how best
                                 to apply this  new technology to solve environmental problems.
The  goal   of   this
method is to  develop
rapid,   routine,  and
cost effective  regional
analytical capability to
discriminate  between
fecal pollution sources
in  fresh  and  marine
waters.

-------