APTD-1504
A STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES IN
DENVER, HOUSTON AND CHICAGO
Fiscal Year 1972
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
-------
APTD-1504
DENVER, HOUSTON AND CHICAGO
Prepared by
Douglas R. Liljedahl
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc ;
19900 East Colfax Avenue
Aurora, Colorado 80011
Contract-Number 68-01-0455
Project Officer: John T . White III
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
July 1973
-------
The APTD (Air Pollution Technical Data) series of reports is issued by the
Office of Air and Water Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
to report technical data of interest to a limited number of readers . Copies
of APTD reports are available free of charge to Federal Employees, current
contractors and grantees, and non-profit organizations - as supplies per-
mit - from the Air Pollution Technical Information Center, U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711,
or may be obtained, for a nominal cost, from the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring-
field, Virginia 22151.
This report was furnished to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
by Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc. in fulfillment of Contract
Number 68-01-0455. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed
are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Environmental
Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is not to be
considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication Number APTD-1504
11
-------
ABSTRACT
A 1aboratory "study was conducted on 1966 through i972 model-year
vehicles operating In three U.S. metropolitan areas, Denver, Houston
and Chicago. The three cities study was a part of a larger study
involving emission testing In six U.S. cities. Five-hundred and ten
vehicles, one-hundred and seventy In each city, were tested to
determine exhaust hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and
oxides of nitrogen emissions. A subsample of twenty of the 1972 model-
year vehicles In the Denver area were also tested for evaporative
hydrocarbon losses. Exhaust emission tests were conducted according
to the 1975 Federal Test Procedures on vehicles as received. Evapor-
ative emission tests were conducted using a slightly modified version
of the Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE J171 SHED procedure. With
respect to vehicle model-years, HC and CO emissions tend to decrease
in the more current model-years while C02 and NOx emissions tend to
increase. Exhaust HC and CO emissions were found to be significantly
higher In Denver, a high altitude city, than HC and CO emissions In
the other two cities at lower elevation, while NOX emissions In Denver
were significantly lower. Similarly, HC and CO emissions In Houston
were higher than HC and CO emissions In Chicago, assumedly resulting
from the relatively severe winter climate experienced In Chicago and
the accompanying requirement for cold weather engine and vehicle
maintenance. By manufacturer, the larger domestic made vehicles
yielded higher HC, CO, C02 and NOX emissions than the smaller foreign
made vehicles. With reference to the 1972 Federal Exhaust Emission
Standards, 3% of the 1972 model-year vehicles tested In Denver were
found to emit both HC and CO below Federal Standards. In Houston,
3U% of the 1972 model-year vehicles were found to emit both HC and CO
below Federal Standards. In Chicago, 51% of the 1972 model-year
vehicles tested were found to emit both HC and CO below 1972 Federal
Standards. With respect to the sample of 170 vehicles tested at each
site; less than 1% of all vehicles tested In Denver emitted both HC
III
-------
and CO below 1972 Federal Standards, about 13% of all vehicles tested
in Houston were below 1972 Standards for HC and CO. In Chicago/ about
16% of all vehicles tested were found to emit below 1972 Federal HC
and CO Standards.
Iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
, Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 3
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN 3
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT 5
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection 6
2.3.2 Incentives 12
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling 15
2.1* FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 17
2.U.I Test Locations 19
2.U.2 Constant Volume Samplers 19
2.U.3 Emission Analysis Consoles 20
2.U.U SHED and Fuel Conditioning Cart 21
2.U.5 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases 21
2.U.6 Chassis Dynamometer 22
2.U.7 Miscellaneous Equipment 23
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, CALIBRATION AND
CROSS-CHECK 23
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler 2U
2.5.2 Emission Analysis Console 26
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer 28
2.5.1* SHED and Fuel Conditioning Cart 29
2.6 TEST PROCEDURES 30
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation 30
2.6.2'EquIpment Preparation 31
2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test
Procedure 32
2.6.U SHED Evaporative Emission
Test Procedure 3U
2.6.5 Daily Test Schedule 35
2.7 DATA HANDLING 37
2.7.1 Data Collection 37
-------
Page
2.7.2 Data Processing UO
2.7.3 Calculation of Results i»3
3. TEST RESULTS U5
3.1 OVERALL EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS i»5
3.1.1 Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Manufacturer i»5
3.1.2 Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Model-Year i»6
3.1.3 Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Number of Cylinders U6
3.1.U Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Engine Displacement k7
3.1.5 Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Vehicle Weight U7
3.1.6 Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Transmission Type U7
3.1.7 Exhaust Emission Test Results
by Carburetor U7
3.1.8 Exhaust Emission Test Repeat Ibl11ty
(Replication) 1*8
3.1.9 Vehicles Meeting 1972 Federal
Exhaust Emission Standards US
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
Since motor vehicles were initially found to contribute
substantially to air pollution problems In the United States, a great
deal of effort and resources have been directed toward finding
solutions to these problems. In recent years, as a result of the
combined efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the
automobile industry, great strides have been made toward achieving this
end. Motor vehicles are now being produced at generally lower
emission levels In each successive model year. In spite of these
efforts, however, motor vehicles are still considered a major source
of atmospheric contamination. Factors which singularly tend to cause
emission levels to Increase, In combination produce emissions at
levels which continue to remain undesirably high. Furthermore, these
same factors which are relatively easy to deal with on a regional
level, become exceedingly complex when considered on a national basis.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), by
authority of the Clean Air Act, Is responsible for the prevention and
control of air pollution. One of the responsibilities of the EPA as
provided by the Act Is the conduct and promotion of surveys and
studies of the causes of air pollution. In this regard, the Sur-
veillance Branch of the EPA, with offices In Ann Arbor, Michigan, Is
responsible for the development of data to enable calculation of
average emission factors for motor vehicles. These factors are
utilized within EPA by the National Air Data Branch and the Land Use
Planning Branch for calculation and projections of nation-wide and
metropolitan area motor vehicle emissions and for the development of
transportation control and emergency episode procedures.
The Environmental Protection Agency, in carrying out Its programs,
contracted with Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc. (ATL), to
provide emission test data from vehicles operating in three U.S.
metropolitan areas. The three cities study was part of a larger
-------
program to study emissions In six cities. This report describes the
conduct of the three cities study and presents the results of testing
in the Denver, Houston and Chicago areas.
-------
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The overall objective of the program was to provide vehicle
emission data to be used to establish and predict vehicle emission
source data on a metropolitan and nation-wide basis. These data are
to be utilized to establish average emission factors from which
emission source Inventories/ vehicle emission control strategies and
emergency episode pollution abatement procedures will be developed.
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN
In order to accomplish the objectives of the study, the EPA
specified that emission tests be conducted on a range of vehicles from
model-years 1966 through 1972 Inclusive. Exhaust emission tests were
to be performed on all vehicles of a specified sample In six disparate
metropolitan areas of the United States. Additionally/ evaporative
emission tests were to be performed on 1972 model-year vehicles
operating in the Denver and Los Angeles areas. As indicated/ this
report covers activities relative to the Denver, Houston and Chicago
areas.
After consideration of the various factors affecting emissions
from motor vehicles/ the requirement for testing in diverse sites and
by model-year becomes obvious. Motor vehicle emissions are affected
directly by topography and Indirectly by climate/ and by engine and
component design and wear. Emissions from vehicles operating In the
Denver area, with respect to topography, for example/ are significantly
higher for exhaust hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions than
emissions from vehicles operating In cities at lower elevations.
Similarly/ emissions from 1966 model-year vehicles sold without
factory Installed control systems are known to be higher than emissions
from recent model-year vehicles equipped with control systems.
With specific reference to topography and climate relative to the
populated areas designated for Investigation; the Denver metropolitan
-------
area is situated at high elevation about one mile above sea-level and
experiences distinct seasonal temperature and weather changes. The
Chicago metropolitan area Is similar to Denver In .clImate but is
situated near sea-level In elevation. The Houston area Is situated
like Chicago near sea-level In elevation, but experiences a relatively
mild climate the year around. Testing requirements In diverse areas
were strengthened not only due to the direct Influence of elevation on
emissions but as a result of varying maintenance requirements and
practices dictated by climatic conditions and by driving habits and
mileage accumulation resulting from urbanization factors.
In addition to those discussed above, other considerations
required attention In support of program objectives. Vehicle model
years specified by the EPA for Investigation were the majority of
vehicles in use and are vehicles which are expected to remain as
pollution sources on the nations streets and highways for some time
to come. Additionally, an Important Item for consideration was that
of matching the test vehicle sample to appearance In the nation-wide
vehicle population by make, engine displacement and other factors
thought to be significant with respect to emission levels. The ratio
of vehicles by model-year was based on vehicle miles traveled as
reported by the National Academy of Science.
The proper conduct of any program Is dependent to a large extent
on the accumulation, processing and reporting of data. To ensure the
accumulation of accurate data and to minimize variables associated
with Instrument and procedural operations In time, and from site to
site, it was Important that all aspects of the program were standard-
ized. Elaborate calibration, cross-check,and operational procedures
were designed, maintained and checked at regular intervals. Standard-
ized data reporting procedures and flow routines were established and
quality audits which checked and verified each and every data point
were performed. In consideration of the Impact the study was to have
on subsequent pollution control and abatement activities, the
-------
significance of testing procedures to represent the contribution of
vehicle emissions to atmospheric loading was recognized. Exhaust and
evaporative emission testing procedures and equipment which best
represented and simulated emissions in metropolitan areas were
required. The constant volume sampling technique by the 1975 Federal
Test Procedure was utilized for determination of exhaust emissions.
The Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED) was applied
for measurement of evaporative hydrocarbon losses in general accordance
with SAE Technical Report J171.
In short, rigid test sample requirements were established,
Individual vehicles were selected by a carefully designed procurement
and selection plan, accurate testing procedures and calibrations were
established and maintained, and all data was subjected to rigid
quality Inspection and verification routines to ensure the overall
accuracy and validity of the study.
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
Several methods exist by which a test sample can be selected and
procured. Theoretically a purely random method of selection will
yield a sample which Is representative of the greater population.
However, with respect to this study, a purely random sample was neither
desirable nor feasible due to several considerations. Regional
vehicle marketing tactics and consumer requirements tend to bias a
sample toward local conditions and secondly, access to the car popu-
lation Is limited. After careful consideration of program objectives
and examination of factors affecting motor vehicle emissions, It was
determined that some biasing of the sample was In order. The Intent
of the program was to provide emission data from a sample based on
nation-wide vehicle registration data. In addition to selection by
model-year, the EPA elected to test vehicles by make, engine dis-
placement, transmission type and carburetlon. The more representative
makes and equipment combinations were specified. In the design of
sample criteria, it was realized that for one reason or another,
-------
total compliance with sample specifications would:'be difficult to
achieve within a reasonable amount of effort. : A system of selection
priorities was then established as follows:
1. Model-year
2. Make
3. Engine Displacement
i*. Transmission
5. Carburetion
Selection criteria specified that the required number of vehicles be
tested by Model-Year and Make. Absolute adherence to sample specifi-
cations was desirable. However, substitution of back-up vehicles was
considered permissible If a vehicle meeting precise sample require-
ments could not be located. In order to produce vehicles meeting
sample criteria/ sample locating strategies were developed as shown
in Figure 2.1 Vehicle Procurement Flow Diagram. Details of the
selection and procurement process are as discussed below.
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection
Several private organizations assemble/ process and compile
national and local vehicle registration data. These data are stored
In computer files and can be accessed by several methods to satisfy
the randomized selection criteria designed Into the study. ATL
obtained lists of registered vehicles In the Denver/ Houston and
Chicago metropolitan areas through a local mailing and advertising
firm, Hlbbert/Laman. Registered vehicles were selected from files
maintained by Postal Zip Code areas. Hlbbert/Laman was required to
suppl" lists by an ntn name computer selection process from Zip Code
areas adjacent to and surrounding laboratory test sites. It was
stipulated that areas under consideration be within ten miles of the
subject city limits.
Upon receipt of candidate test vehicle lists which were delivered
in the form of gummed labels and computer tabulations/ Hlbbert/Laman
printed materials/ affixed address labels to mater Ials, and stuffed
envelopes. Materials were scheduled for mailing about two weeks In
advance of anticipated test start-up. The two week Interval provided
-------
Prepare
Introductory
Letters & P.C.
i
Obtain 1 1st
of Candidate
Vehicles
Distribution of
Candidate List
ATL, Mai 1 Ing, Test
Sites
Schedule
. And Mall
By City
Select Test
Vehicles
From Response
Complete
Agreements
Vehicle
Pretest
1 nspect ion
Perform
Partlcl pant
1 nterface
Schedule
For
Testing
Soak Area
Vehicle
Rejected
Safety
Test
Return to
Owner wl th
Explanation
Return to
Participant
i
Figure 2.1, VEHICLE PROCUREMENT FLOW DIAGRAM
-------
sufficient time for the material to arrive at Its destination, and for
interested candidates to review, complete and forward required materials
for receipt and processing by ATL. Figures 2.2, 2.3, and 2.1* are
presented as samples to Indicate the content of mailings.
In theory, this strategem should have produced the desired sample
of vehicles. In actual practice, however, about 90 to 95 percent of
vehicles required were obtained. Experience indicated that a doubling
of initial mailings would not necessarily produce the entire sample
required. In Denver, for example, mailings were sent to 2500 potential
candidates. About 90% of the sample was obtained as a result of the
Denver mailing. In Houston, a mailing went out to 5000 potential
candidates. The mailing produced about 95% of the desired sample.
This indicates that to produce an additional one-half of the hard-to-
find vehicles, a doubling of initial mailings is required. Based on
experience gained in Denver and Houston, it was believed that response
to the mailings could be Improved for the Chicago effort by employing
another tactic. However, this did not prove to be the situation.
Coincident with material mailings In Chicago, announcements were
released to the news-media, local newspapers, radio stations, and
television. News coverage was good, but failed to produce a signifi-
cantly improved response.
As a result of the failure of mailings to supply the necessary
test vehicles, other tactics were employed. In the Houston and Chicago
phases of the study, the assistance of fraternal and religious organi-
zations was enlisted. Vehicles procurred and tested as a result of
this tactic represented about 30% of the vehicles tested at each site.
In view of the bias known to exist with respect to regional vehicle
buying and marketing characteristics, the benefits of this tactic are
difficult to evaluate. Although the sample tested in Houston and
Chicago fits the desired sample to a greater degree, the resulting
Improved fit may be a result of additions and Improvements to mailing
materials and Improvements In candidate handling techniques and
-------
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
1029 SOUTH BOULEVARD • OAK PARK. ILLINOIS 6O3O2 « 386-2559
Dear Vehicle Owner:
You may be able to make an important contribution towards controlling
the nation's air pollution problem, and receive a $25 United States
Savings Bond for your cooperation.
As you may know, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is conduct-
ing an important testing program for vehicle exhaust pollution in six major
metropolitan areas: Chicago, St. Louis, Denver, Los Angeles, Houston, and
Washington, D.C. Our organization has been selected by the Government to
perform these tests in this area. We are writing you because your vehicle
has been randomly selected as a candidate for testing.
Enclosed is a postpaid reply card which you should complete and
return at your earliest convenience. Printed on the card is the model,
year and make of a vehicle registered in your name. Please indicate if you
are willing to submit it to our laboratory where it will be tested under
simulated normal driving conditions. No unusual operations will be per-
formed and no adjustments will be made to your vehicle. It will be fully
insured while in our possession.
We have been authorized by the Environmental Protection Agency to
award a $25 United States Savings Bond to each participant whose vehicle
is testedl Also, we will provide you, free of charge, a late-model, fully-
insured rental car for your use during the time your vehicle is being tested.
We know you will want to be a part of this important project. Please
complete and return the enclosed postage-paid postcard today. We will con-
tact you shortly to schedule the test.
Beginning Wednesday, March 28th, you may call 386-2559 or 386-2251 if
you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
President
Figure 2.2, SAMPLE OF ATL INTRODUCTORY LETTER
-------
_ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'V
-------
W
c
re.
to
-o
r?
m
6'
c.
73
Z
o
>
S3
O
BUSINESS REPLY CARD
No Postage Stamp Necessary if Mailed in the United State*
POSIAGE Will BE PAID BY
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
1029 South Boulevard
Oak Park. Illinois 60302
fo.« No 4305!
Yes. I am willing to volunteer my cor for pollution letting
Make of cor . '
My car's engine displacement is
Serial Number '_
Carburetor.
Model
Cubic inches.
Transmission:
Home Phone
I barrel _
4 barrel _
Automatic
2 barrel _
Fuel Inj. _
Manual
Fill in as
completely
at possible.
FIRST CLASS
PERMIT NO 182
Oak Park. III.
Year
Business Phong
FILL OUT
AND RETURN
POSTCARD TODAY!
Ext.
HAV 71
VALDA I DTFHUIS
10 S 20TH AV
BAYCOOD IL 6.0153
If the above is incorrect, please correct.
-------
candidate awareness of local a$r pollution conditions. Figures 2.5
and 2.6 Indicate the quality of the vehicle sample actually tested
compared to the sample desired for each city. In order to locate the
hard-to-find vehicles, other tactics were employed. Hard-to-find
vehicles were finally obtained from car lots, new car dealership
service files and by direct advertising.
Upon receipt of Information on candidate test vehicles via
returned post-cards, a candidate vehicle file was established by
model-year, make, engine size, etc. Where cards were returned with
incomplete information, a telephone call was made relative to the
vehicle in question in an attempt to assist owners to more precisely
define vehicles. Additional information was supplied owners with
respect to engine Identification, one of the more difficult vehicle
parameters to Identify. The owner was requested to consult his owners
manual, emission system specification label affixed to the engine
compartment, vehicle I.D. number, or engine I.D. number. After pro-
curement personnel were sufficiently satisfied of the validity of
candidate vehicle Information files, vehicles In compliance with or
closely adhering to the priority criteria discussed earlier, were
scheduled for testing. Schedules were established In accordance with
project requirements. Upon delivery of test vehicles to the laboratory,
all vehicles were inspected for compliance with established or substi-
tute criteria prior to acceptance.
2.3.2 Incentlves
Experience has shown that response to public-oriented programs
can be significantly Improved through the offer of incentives. In the
study described, Incentives of a $25.00 U.S. Savings Bond and the loan
of a late-model courtesy car was offered to encourage private car
owner participation In the program. Subjective observations Indicate
Incentives in this order are near optimum. Loan vehicles provided
participants with transportation during the interval their vehicles
were being prepared and tested, and the $25.00 Savings Bond provided
12
-------
Kjake
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT 1 AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
Model Year
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
Engine CID
Less than 251
251-330
331-399
Greater than 399
Transmission
Automatic
Manual
Carburetor
- i» Barrel
2 Barrel
1 Barrel
Fuel Injection
Requested •-
Sample . :
5
12
it
39
U
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
1U
3
10
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
1*0
It it
52
3U
139
31
31
106
32
1
Number
Chicago
5
12
it
39
l»
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
11*
3
10
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
38
U5
52
35
11*8
22
30
107
32
1
of Cars
Denver
5
12
it
39
U .
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
Ul
kl
53
35
138
32
itl
93
32
it
Tested
Houston
5
12
it
39
U
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
lit
3
10
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
UO
It U
51
35
136
3it
38
97
3it
1
Figure 2.5, REQUESTED TEST SAMPLE vs. ACTUAL SAMPLE
13
-------
PossI bl e
Number of Substl
Substl tut Ions Chicago
AMC
BUI CK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
Engine CID
Transmission Type
Carburetor
Total
Per Cent
Substl tutlon
5
12
U
39
i»
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
ll»
3
10
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
170
170
170
850
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
15
13
U7
5.5%
Denver
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
25
33
7U
8.7%
tutlons
Houston
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
19
22
52
6.1%
Figure 2.6, SUBSTITUTIONS BY CATEGORY TO IDEAL SAMPLE
1.U
-------
Incentives to participants to deliver vehicles to the laboratory for
testing. In addition/ the Savings Bonds frequently provided the
necessary balance of reassurance required by the participant.
In a few isolated situations/ the Incentives offered were not
considered by candidates to be adequate to secure cooperation. In
these situations a courteous thanks was extended to the candidate If
the vehicle In question was not vital to the success of the program.
If a vehicle was vital, additional Incentive was offered, normally In
the form of cash/ to secure the vehicle for testing. Likewise, in
isolated circumstances, the Savings Bond was rejected In favor of an
equivalent value In cash. All participants were compensated by either
a U.S. Savings Bond or equivalent in cash or more. All but a relatively
few participants required the use of a courtesy vehicle.
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling
The candidate test vehicle file from which vehicles were scheduled
for testing has been described. Vehicle tests were scheduled In
consideration of project completion requirements and manpower avail-
ability. Vehicle procurement personnel normally scheduled vehicles
no more than two days in advance of testing. After an Initial trial
period In an attempt to optimize schedules, experience indicated that
a schedule filled in excess of the two day advance period was difficult
to revise. Revised schedules were occasionally required if equipment
or other failure necessitated revision, and candidates notified no
more than two days in advance were normally prompt with respect to
vehicle delivery and did not require additional telephone follow-up
remi nders.
Upon delivery of a test vehicle to the laboratory/ vehicle equip-
ment reported originally by the owner was verified and the vehicle was
Inspected for safety and exhaust.system Integrity. If rejected, the
vehicle was returned to the participant and as previously forewarned,
no Incentives were provided. If the vehicle was determined to be
acceptable/ It was furthur Inspected for existent damage. Existent
15
-------
damage such as scratches, scrapes/ nicks, dents, broken windows, etc.
were noted on a Vehicle Inspection sheet along with odometer readings
and Indication of special or peculiar equipment. Damage was brought
to the attention of the participant and agreement was indicated by the
participants signature as required. A loan vehicle and test vehicle
agreement form was then completed by ATL and the participant.
As indicated, loan vehicles were provided to participants to
minimize Inconvenience associated with the loss of personal vehicles
for the required testing interval. Late model loan vehicles were
provided by Dollar-a-Day rental car agencies In each city. Insurance
and participant protection was provided not only with respect to loan
vehicles, but also relative to test vehicles. In order to maintain
rigid testing schedules, ATL elected to have a 20| surplus of loan
vehicles available at test sites. Although an attempt was made to
encourage the prompt return of loan vehicles, participants frequently
failed to meet the required loan vehicle return schedule. Without a
surplus of loan vehicles, incoming owners of test vehicles would have
experienced unnecessary and potentially aggravating delays. Upon
completion of vehicle agreements, all forms were returned to the test
vehicle and the vehicle was moved to a staging area for pre-test
preparation and conditioning as required.
This study Is the second In a current series of emissions studies
In metropolitan areas. Experience with the previous program indicated
a necessity In some situations for consideration of special vehicle
fuel requirements. In the Six Cities Emission Study of Fiscal Year
1971 In which ATL was a sub-contractor and performed testing In Denver
and St. Louis, some difficulty relative to test fuel was experienced.
In Denver In particular, where testing was performed using tank fuels
of high winter-grade volatility, testing on several vehicles was
difficult to complete due to vehicle operational problems caused by
vapor-lock.
16
-------
In anticipation of such problems, vehicle fuel criteria were
established for the subject study. In order to minimize operational
problems relating to test fuels, vehicles were not emission tested
using winter-grade fuels. Vehicle fueling criteria were established
which required fuel tanks which contained winter-grade fuels at the
time of delivery to the laboratory be drained and refilled with summer-
grade fuel. Vehicles subjected to this procedure were then operated
In a normal manner for about 10 minutes on a city route to purge
remaining winter-grade fuel from the fuel system. As a matter of
Interest, Denver test vehicles were the only vehicles required to be
subjected to fuel changes as a result of winter-grade fuel marketing
in the test area during the time period testing was performed.
Figure 2.6 shows the routing of test vehicles from acceptance
through return to participants at the completion of testing. As
Indicated, In applicable fuel situations fuel tanks were drained,
re-filled to kOl of tank capacity with prescribed test fuel, operated
for ten minutes over a city route or equivalent and temperature soaked
for the required interval prior to testing. Evaporative test vehicles
were drained of fuel, re-filled to kO% of tank capacity with Indolene
30 or summer-grade fuel, operated on the chassis dynamometer for the
1372 second Federal Driving Schedule, and temperature soaked for the
required Interval prior to pre-test preparation and testing. Upon
completion of testing, engine diagnostic procedures were performed
(basic timing, point dwell, Idle rpm and mixture). The vehicle was
then re-fueled as required and returned to the participant.
2.i» FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc. operates permanent laboratory
facilities In the Denver area. In order to complete the project as
required, it was necessary to utilize two sets of test equipment.
Prior to shipment to temporary sites established specifically for this
program, equipment was installed in the Denver laboratory and subjected
to pre-shipment Inspection, calibration and operation.
17
-------
[Accepted Vehicle
Drain Tank! ^
Add Test
Fuel-2 Gal
-Yes-l Test OK?
Dyno Run
1372 Sec.
\
r
Fuel Sample
Fuel Analysis
Diagnostic
& Fueling
Figure 2.6, TEST VEHICLE ROUTING
-------
2.U.1 Test Locations
Aside from the permanent laboratory facilities maintained in the
Denver metropolitan area, two additional sites were temporarily es-
tablished In the Chicago and Houston metropolitan areas. Mean
elevations above sea-level and the location of each facility is as
i ndi cated below:
Denver 19900 East Col fax Avenue
Aurora, Colorado 80011
5i»90 feet
Houston 2136 Wlrtcrest
Houston, Texas 77055
60 feet
Chicago 1029 South Blvd.
Oak Park, Illinois 60302
590 feet
The Denver facility, situated about six miles from the eastern
boundary of the Denver city limits, contained about 4800 square feet
of laboratory and soak area. The facility In the Houston area, was
located In the northwest part of Houston within the city limits and
contained about 6,000 square feet of laboratory and soak area. The
Chicago facility was located about two miles west of the Chicago city
limits and contained about 10,000 square feet of laboratory and soak
area.
2.U.2 Constant Volume Samplers
Two constant volume samplers (CVS) were used in the conduct of
the study, described as CVS A and CVS 6. CVS A was utilized for
testing in the Denver area and CVS B was utilized in Houston and
Chicago. Samplers, designed and constructed by Automotive Environ-
mental Systems, Inc. of Westminister, California, were of similar
design with nominal flow capacity of 325 scfm. Each CVS mass pump
(blower) Is driven by a 2k0 volt, 3 phase, 5 horsepower motor through
a gear-belt arrangement. Blower revolutions are counted by the use of
a magnetic pick-up and associated clrculty and displayed on an elec-
tronic counter. Relatively constant diluted exhaust temperatures
(+. 2°F) are maintained by a gas to water heat exchanger and temperature
controller.
19
-------
CVS A, utilized In the Denver testing, had been subjected to
regular use over the nine month period preceedlng this project.
During the period flow rates of CVS A had been measured and recorded
at regular Intervals. Observation of flow rates Indicated that in-
ternal deposits and slippage normal to the pump continued to remain
stable. CVS B, utilized in Houston and Chicago, was assembled a short
time before being put Into service. Although this unit was operated
for about 25 hours under exhaust gas pumping conditions prior to
normal service, blower characteristics continued to change at a
relatively slow rate well Into the program. Blower flow rate changes
will be discussed In a later section.
2.U.3 Emission Analysis Console
Like the constant volume samplers, two exhaust analysis consoles
were used to perform testing. Console A was used in Denver and Console
B was used in Houston and Chicago. Both consoles are identical in
operational and performance characteristics and contain the following
major pieces of Instrumentation:
Beckman Model 315A NDIR CO analyzers with stacked cell
arrangement, 6 range capabilities and C02 interference
filters.
Beckman Model 315A and 315B NDIR C02 analyzers with 3 range
capabi11ti es.
Beckman Model UOO Hydrocarbon Flame lonlzatlon Detector.
Thermal Electron Model 10A Chemllumlnescent NO and NOX
Analyzer equipped with thermal converter and 7 range
capabilit!es.
Texas Instrument 10 inch dual channel potentlometric
recorders.
Analytical consoles were designed and constructed by ATL In accordance
with the requirements of applicable Federal Registers for exhaust
emissions testing by the 1972 and 1975 procedures. Console modifi-
cations for drying emission samples and removing C02 from the CO
sample stream were not provided, however, In view of the relatively
high emission levels expected to be encountered.
20
-------
2.U.U SHED and Fuel Conditioning Cart
Evaporative hydrocarbon losses were measured using the technique
of SAE J171 which requires losses be contained and measured In a
Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination (SHED). The SHED,
constructed of aluminum panels and Dupont Tedlar film Is sufficiently
large to Internally accomodate standard sized passenger cars and light
trucks. Nominal dimensions are 21 feet long by 10 feet wide by 8 feet
high. Taut sheets of Tedlar film cover the ceiling and doors and
strategically located wall cut-outs to permit the entrance of light
and visual contact with the vehicle under test. Hinged doors seal
upon closing and latches are provided to maintain the enclosure at a
relatively air tight condition. Enclosure leakage rates are within
specifications of SAE J171. An internal blower of nominal 100 cfm
flow capacity is provided to mix the atmosphere of the chamber. Sealed
thermocouple connectors and a sample port are also provided.
A Fuel Conditioning Cart designed and constructed by ATL was
utilized for pre-condltlonlng and storage of evaporative emission test
fuel. The cart contains an Insulated container for storage and tempera*
ture conditioning of up to 30 gallons of fuel/ a 30 gallon waste fuel
container, a heat exchanger with heating and cooling capabilities,
automatic temperature control and a nominal 5 gallon per minute fuel
pump for vehicle tank draining and filling operations.
To measure hydrocarbon evaporative losses to the SHED atmosphere
a Beckman Model UOO Hydrocarbon Flame lonlzatlon Detector was employed.
Tank fuel heating was accomplished by regulating voltage to an aluminum
heat sink and 1500 watt heating element strategically located below
the vehicle fuel tank. A 2U channel multi-point Texas Instruments
0-UOO degree F recorder In conjunct Ion wlth Iron-constantan thermo-
couples was used to monitor SHED ambient and tank fuel temperatures.
2.U.5 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases
Two sets of laboratory standard gas blends were used to establish
and maintain analytical Instrument calibrations. Prior to the start-up
21
-------
of testing, gas blends from all contractors Involved In this program
were shipped to EPA 1aboratory facl1 I11es In Ann Arbor, Michigan, for
concurrent analysis and Identification. The complement of gaseous
standards was of a quantity sufficient to permit calibration of
analytical Instrumentation at a minimum of five points on each
applicable operating range. Figure 2.7 Is a list showing concentra-
tions of gaseous project standards.
HC(ppmC)
39.6
58.2
108.0
109.5
CCKmole I
0.0172
0.0511
0.0607
0.098U
0.1061*
0.1797
C0?(mole
0.1*373
0.60U2
0.99UO
2.0U62
NOx(DDm)
32
1*9
98
250.5
322.2
513.0
592.5
)
0.2061
0.2078
0.2977
0.3103
0.3963
0.5500
I)
3.0275
3.0800
3.1100
3.1*100
109
178
191
978.0
1263.0
1909.5
2957.0
0.65
1.01
. 1.02
1.13
1.67
2.07
3.63
l». 08
U.82
5.56
201*
250
32U
5619.0
5772.0
7068.6
80U5.0
2.98
3.22
3.73
5.53
7.65
7.71
7.95
8.00
8.93
10.25
1*11
523
695
19906.0
56295.0
_
9.83
11.58
11.08
11.92
13.87
785
97U
1188
Figure 2.7, CONCENTRATIONS OF GASEOUS PROJECT STANDARDS
2.U.6 Chassis Dynamometer
Two Clayton chassis dynamometers were used In the conduct of SHED
pre-condltlonlng and exhaust emission tests. Dyno A was used for
testing In Denver and Dyno B was used In the performance of testing
in Houston and Chicago.
Both chassis dynamometers were equipped with variable inertia
flywheel assemblies of 1500 to 5500 Ib. vehicle equivalent weight and
incremental selection capabilities. The Inertia assembly used In
conjunction with Dyno A for testing In Denver was of Clayton Mfg. Co.
22
-------
design and construction. The inertia assembly used In conjunction
with Dyno B was of Clayton design but was fabricated and constructed
by ATL. Clayton Mfg. Co. was unable to deliver an Inertia assembly
within the time-frame required for maintenance of project schedules.
Prior to pressing the ATL fabricated Inertia assembly Into service,
its Inertlal loading characteristics were fully evaluated and compared
with the Clayton built assembly. Operational characteristics of the
ATL assembly were found to be Identical to those of the assembly
fabricated and supplied by Clayton.
2.1*.7 Miscellaneous Equipment
In addition to major pieces of equipment described, a Varian
Model G1000 drivers aid was utilized for vehicle testing operation
during the Federal Driving Sequence. Engine cooling was provided by
nominal 4800 cfm air blowers (fans) directed at the radiator and
underhood of the vehicle. The dynamometer utilized for testing in
Denver was flush mounted and special provisions for leveling of the
test vehicle were not required. The dynamometer used for temporary
site testing was floor mounted. Dynamometer entrance and exit ramps
were supplied to facilitate on-off vehicle flow and leveling. A
ratcheting type winch device was employed to restrain the vehicle
during dynamometer operations In addition to the restraint provided
by wheel chocks.
Engine diagnostics were performed using garage type tune-up
equipment/ tachometer/ dwell meter and timing light. Additional
Instrumentation was utilized for test equipment calibration and cross-
check and Is described In paragraph 2.5.
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION. CALIBRATION AND CROSS-CHECK
In order to ensure the validity of all test data, extensive
qualification/ calibration and cross-check procedures were required
prior to the start-up of testing and at regular intervals during
project performance. Compliance criteria were established relative
23
-------
to analytical system calibration, constant volume sampler flow rate
determlnation, dynamometer performance and calibration, and SHED cali-
bration and leakage rates. The following paragraphs describe in
detail the procedures which were established and maintained In
compliance with criteria.
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler
The first In a series of steps to establish and determine
compliance with calibration criteria relative to the CVS was to
accurately measure the mass pump flow rate. In order to determine
the flow rate It was necessary to employ a primary flow measurement
device, In this case a Merlam Laminar Flow Element (LFE), and supple-
mental temperature and pressure measuring devices. The LFE utilized
was a Model 50, rated at 1,000 cfm at 8 inches of H20 pressure
differential across the element. Auxiliary devices employed consisted
of: a mercury barometer, close tolerance thermometers, U-tube water
and mercury manometers, and an Inclined water manometer. Instru-
mentation used at each site was Identical or equivalent with one
exception. The barometer used In Denver, where mean absolute pressure
is about 24.50 inches of Hg or about 5.5 Inches of Hg lower than at
sea-level, featured Indicating scales to accomodate the lower pressures,
Both Inlet and outlet flow rates of the mass pump were measured at
several Incremental changes In Inlet pressure depressions to bracket
pump flow volume and to determine optimum operating conditions. Inlet
flow measurements were performed by blocking off the dilution air
inlet at dilution air filters.
As specified In the Federal Register mass flow through the
laminar flow element was calculated by the following formula:
VLFE SCFM= ISCFM x T|_C *
where:
SCFM«= absolute flow rate of the laminar flow element
In standard cubic feet per minute
-------
I SCFM » Indicated flow rate of the laminar flow element
in standard cubic feet per minute
TLC = a temperature correction factor
PL "H20 = the Inlet pressure to the laminar flow element
in inches of water
and
l»06.8"H20= standard absolute pressure in inches of water.
Calibration of the laminar flow element was traceable to the National
Bureau of Standards. Volume of the blower In cubic feet per revolution
was calculated as follows:
v a VLFE SCFM x ii06.8"H20 x TP °R
RPM Pp "H20 5300R
where:
Vo ™ volume of the blower per revolution In scfm
VLFE SCFM= volume of the laminar flow element In scfm
RPM = revolutions per minute of the blower
i*06.8"H20» standard absolute pressure In Inches of water
Pp"H20 a Inlet pressure to the blower in inches of water
Tp °R a inlet temperature to the blower In degrees
absolute
530°R •** standard absolute temperature in degrees absolute.
As previously Indicated, blower Inlet and outlet flow rates were
determined at several Incremental changes in blower inlet pressure
(Pp) and blower differential pressure (Ap). Rates were determined
from one operational extreme to the other. Data were then plotted,
mid-range Pp and Ap were determined, and V0 was selected and Incorpo-
rated into computer programs for subsequent calibration verification
and mass emission calculations.
As verification of blower flow calibration, effectiveness of the
CVS dilutlon alr mlxlng chamber, and integrity of the plumbing and
sampling system, propane recovery tests were performed initially and
on a daily basis. Propane recovery tests were considered the standard
by which the CVS, sample 11nes, and the Flame lonlzation Detector and
other supporting instrumentation were checked and verified. Propane
25
-------
recovery tolerances were established at ± 2 percent of measured
Injected propane values. A propane recovery test is performed by
Injecting a known weight of propane Into the CVS exhaust collector
tube over an Interval of time. During this Interval the CVS is
operational and a diluted sample of Injected propane is recovered In
the sample bag and measured In terms of ppm carbon by the hydrocarbon
FID. Hydrocarbon levels of the dilution air background Is subtracted
from the value in the sample bag. Propane recovery calculations are
then performed and the calculated recovered value Is compared with the
weighed Injected value. Recovery within *, 2 percent of Injected
propane is Indicative of the integrity of calibration and sample
sub-systems.
2.5.2 Emission Analysis Console
As discussed, two emission analysis consoles were used In the
three sites to perform emission testing. Complete analytical system
calibrations were performed at monthly Intervals. A check of zero,
mid-range/ and high calibration points was performed on a weekly basis.
Up-scale calibration span settings were established just prior to
emission sampling. Calibration tolerances were established at plus
or minus one percent of full scale or plus or minus five percent of
measured value, whichever Is smaller. A first degree equation curve
fit was required for defining calibration characteristics of the FID
and NO-NOX instruments. A second degree fit was required for the NDIR
CO and C02 Instruments. Curve fitting was accomplished by computer
operation.
Prior to calibration of analytical Instrumentation, a complete
leak check was performed. First, the sample control solenoid In the
CVS was deactivated which shut off flow from the sample bags. Sample
pumps were activated. That portion of the sample plumbing system was
considered acceptable If the flow Indicating rotometers dropped to a
flow rate of zero. As a complete and final check on Integrity of the
analytical system, a sample of trl-blend gas, CO, C02 and propane was
26
-------
injected Into totally evacuated sample bags to a relatively low volume.
The sample was then evacuated through the analytical system. A larger
volume of trl-blend gas was then routed Into the sample bag and
analyzed and recorded in a conventional manner. The same trl-blend
gas was then analyzed through the ca1 I brat Ion gas circuit and compared
with values recorded from the sample bag. The exhaust sample circuit
was considered acceptable if bag values were within 0.5$ of calibration
circuit values. A similar procedure verified the Integrity of the
NO-NOx sample circuit using an NO gas blend analyzed through the
thermal converter of the chemiluminescent Instrument as NOX.
With reference to the chemi1umlnescent Instrument/ a preliminary
leak check was performed prior to verification by the sample bag/cali-
bration circuit technique. All sample and by-pass Inlets to the
instrument were shut off. With the vacuum pump operating/ the pump
was allowed to evacuate the system down to minimum pressure. The
instrument plumbing system was considered to be leak free If the
pressure dropped to less than 0.5 torr. Normal reaction chamber
operating pressure was in the 5•to 10 torr range.
With further reference to the chemiluminescent instrument, the
efficiency of the thermal converter was required to be known. Ef-
ficiency was determined by injecting a relatively large quantity of
nitric oxide Into an auxiliary sample bag partially filled with air.
The NO to N02 reaction in the bag was then monitored alternately
through the thermal converter and converter by-pass. Converter
efficiency was assumed to be 100% If the N02 (NOX) concentration In
the bag remained relatively constant.
As noted by the manufacturer of the NDIR CO analyzer/ instrument
response is affected In a positive direction by Interference from C02
gas and water vapor. Optical or gas filters are provided to minimize
Interference. However/ deterioration In the effectiveness of filters
may occur causing CO values to appear to Increase. C02 and water
vapor response were monitored on a weekly basis. This was accomplished
27
-------
by pumping water saturated C02 gas through the CO sample circuit and
recording the resultant response. The filter system was considered
adequate If interference remained below 0.5$ of full scale on the
0-10% CO range. A response greater than 0.5% of full scale indicated
the filter system was Inadequate and required attention.
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer
Chassis dynamometers were calibrated at each test site Initially
and calibrations were verified at intervals of about two weeks during
testing. The speedmeter was calibrated first. An 1800 rpm strobe
light was beamed at the dynamometer rolls. A vehicle was utilized to
drive the rolls at a rate at which the roll speed was in synchronization
with the modulating light beam. The gain of the speedmeter circuit
was then adjusted to Indicate a meter speed of i»6.5 miles per hour
which corresponds to a roll speed of 1800 rpm. The speed Indicating
adjusting screw was then locked. A dead weight torque bridge cali-
bration was then performed.
All water was removed from the power absorption unit (water
brake). A voltage was then applied to the load cell torque bridge to
simulate a roll surface speed of U6.5 mph. A known weight was then
applied to the water brake torque arm and the dynamometer horsepower
meter was adjusted to correspond to the simulated horsepower absorption
value. Power losses Internal to the dynamometer were then determined.
The water brake was loaded to an Indicated horsepower at 50 mph.
A vehicle was used to drive the dynamometer rolls. After indicated
horsepower reading had stabilized, the reading was recorded and the
vehicle was utilized to drive the rolls to a speed In excess of 55 mph.
The vehicle was then raised until the drive tires cleared the rolls.
The elapsed time for the roll speed to drop from 55 to U5 mph was
recorded. This procedure was repeated at several Increments of
Indicated horsepower. Actual dynamometer horsepower absorbed was
then calculated according to the Federal Register as follows:
28
-------
Hp= 0.06073 (W/T) . :
where Hp= actual horsepower ,,
0.06073= a constant. .. .
W= weight of.the.Inertia flywheel engaged In Ibs.
and ,
T= roll down time from 55 to U5 mph In seconds.
Actual horsepower was then plotted against Indicated horsepower and a
dynamometer calibration table was developed. Dynamometer emission
tests were performed at actual 50 mph horsepower settings determined
from the indicated versus actual horsepower table.
2.5.1* SHED and Fuel Conditioning Cart
The SHED and fuel conditioning cart have been described. The
fuel conditioning cart did not require special calibration aside from
calibration of a sight glass which was referenced with respect to the
dispensing of known quantities of fuel. Calibration of the sight
glass, which was plumbed in parallel with the insulated storage tank/
was accomplished by simply dividing the height of the tank by its
known volume.. The tank Is uniform in diameter. A scale graduated in
gallons was then developed and located adjacent to the sight glass.
SHED calibration was performed In accordance with the procedures
of SAE J171. The SHED doors were sealed and a hydrocarbon background
reading, was taken. A known quantity, of propane was Injected Into the
SHED and the Internal SHED blower was started.. When the internal SHED
atmosphere was determined to be well mixed as Indicated by the recorder
trace/ a sample was taken and the SHED hydrocarbon level recorded.
Calculations were then performed using the measured volume of the SHED
and calculated propane content was determined. The calculated value
was then compared with the. weighed propane value. Calculated SHED
propane content was required-to be within plus or minus five percent
of the weighed Injected value. .The SHED was then a 1 lowed to remain
sealed for a period of four hours at which time the SHED atmosphere
29
-------
was again sampled for hydrocarbons. A calculation of SHED propane was
again performed using the values obtained after the four hour leak
check period and compared with Initial calculated values. SHED
leakage rate was considered acceptable If the leakage rate was less
than 0.1 gram per hour. Typical weighed propane values for SHED
calibration and leak check were In the order of 20 to 25 grams of
propane per test.
In the performance of SHED calibration and leak checks/ calibra-
tion of the hydrocarbon flame ionlzation detector was critical. FID
calibration and tolerances were In accordance with procedures as
described in paragraph 2.5.2 relative to the emission analysis console.
2.6 TEST PROCEDURES
The following paragraphs describe that phase of the study which
relates to vehicle and equipment preparation and the performance of
emission tests and engine diagnostic procedures.
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation
Upon receipt of a vehicle for testing/ a pre-test inspection was
performed. The general mechanical condition of the vehicle was de-
termined relative to Integrity of the exhaust system and safety. The
vehicle was then prepared as required for testing. Non-evaporative
test vehicles in Denver, where winter-grade fuels were marketed during
the testing Interval were drained of existing fuel/ re-filled with
summer-grade fuel to kQ% of tank capacity and operated over a 10
minute city route. The vehicle was then parked for the required
temperature soak period prior to testing. It was not necessary to
comply with fueling criteria at other sites as a result of other than
winter grade fuel being marketed In the area. Fuel marketed In the
Houston area during February and March when testing was performed was
of Intermediate grade. Similarly/ fuel marketed in Chicago during the
month of April was of Intermediate grade.
30
-------
Evaporative emission tests were performed In Denver only.
Vehicles scheduled for evaporative tests/ upon receipt and acceptance,
were drained of existing fuel via the filler neck. The fuel condi-
tioning cart drain hose was then attached to the vehicle fuel pump
supply line from the fuel tank and fuel remaining in the bottom of the
tank was removed. Two gallons of test fuel (Indolene 30 or summer-
grade) was added to the tank. The vehicle was then operated on the
chassis dynamometer for the 1372 second Federal Driving Schedule to
purge and replace winter-grade fuel remaining In the vehicle fuel
system (carburetor and fuel pump). This procedure was utilized In
lieu of pre-conditioning on the 10 minute city route. The vehicle was
then parked in preparation for evaporative diurnal loss measurement
on the following day.
During much of the testing Interval in Denver, outside ambient
temperatures were well below the freezing point. For this reason and
in consideration of the design of the evaporative emission test pro-
cedure, basically a test to establish evaporative losses under warm
weather conditions, it was considered unrealistic to attempt to pre-
condition vehicles in the relatively cold temperature conditions
existent outside. Evaporative and fuel system conditioning was there-
fore, routinely performed Indoors on the chassis dynamometer under
more realistic operating conditions.
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation
The qualification and calibration procedures relative to test
equipment and instrumentation have been described.
In preparation for testing, test personnel would arrive In the
laboratory about one hour In advance of testing. During the one hour
interval the folVow!ng operations were performed:
1. Test Instrumentation which had been idle or in a stand-by
condition was turned on and allowed to warm-up.
2. Following Instrument warm-up, sample and analytical
system leak checks were performed.
31
-------
3. The analytical system was checked for proper operation.
Gain/ tune and zero settings were observed and recorded.
4
U. The efficiency of the chemilumlnescent Instrument thermal
converter was checked.
5. Propane recovery tests were performed.
6. The chassis dynamometer was warmed up for 10 minutes by
vehicle operation at 50 mph. Inertia weight and dyna-
mometer road load settings were established at conditions
prescribed for testing of the first vehicle. The drivers
aid speed calibration was verified.
In the preparation of equipment for evaporative emission tests, a
quantity of fuel sufficient to conduct evaporative tests was added to
the cold storage tank on the day prior to the test. The temperature
controller was then set for the proper temperature. For tank thermo-
couple installation/ the tank cap supplied with the vehicle was
drilled and thermocouple wires installed such that with the cap in
place and locked/ the junction was Immersed approximately mid-way in
the tank fuel without touching the sides of the tank. A new cap was
installed after testing.
2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure
Cold start exhaust emission tests were performed In accordance
with the procedures specified In 35 Federal Register 219, Part I I/
dated November 10/ 1970 and as amended In 36 Federal Register 55, and
36 Federal Register 128. All vehicles were tested as received from
the participant without further modification or adjustment.
Prior to testing/ all vehicles were temperature soaked a minimum
of 12 hours. Dynamometer settings/ in preparation for tests on specific
vehicles/ were established using non-test vehicles/ le/ vehicles not
scheduled for emission tests In the next 2k hour period. For cold
start tests/ vehicles were pushed or towed on the dynamometer. Drive
tires were Inflated to a pressure of UO psl, the vehicle restraining
winch was Installed on the rear bumper of the vehicle and wheel chocks
were located. The engine cooling fan was moved into place and situated
In front of the grille. The vehicle operator positioned himself In
the vehicle and adjusted the drivers aid to a location convenient
32
-------
for viewing.
Just prior to vehicle start-up, CVS sample and back-ground bags
were evacuated and the blower revolution counter was re-set to zero.
To alert the Instrument operator that the test was about to start/ the
vehicle operator sounded the vehicle horn twice In rapid succession.
The Instrument operator responded with a signal that pre-test prepar-
ations were in order. The horn was sounded once again signalling the
start of the test. Simultaneously/ the engine was cranked and the
cold transient segment of the test was started. At the 505 second
point/ the vehicle horn was again sounded/ signalling the end of the
cold transient segment and the start of the cold stabilized segment of
the test. The Instrument operator responded by diverting sample and
background flow Into the second set of CVS sample and backgound bags.
The cold transient sample was then subjected to analysis. The vehicle
operator continued the test through the cold stabilized segment. The
engine was shut down 2 seconds prior to termination of sampling. The
horn was again sounded to signal the end to the sampling period/ at
which time CVS sampling was terminated and the cold stabilized bag was
analyzed.
Upon termination of the cold start segment of the test/ the CVS
exhaust collector tube was uncoupled from the vehicle tailpipe/ the
vehicle cooling fan was shut down and the vehicle hood was closed.
The vehicle was then allowed to hot soak for a period of ten minutes.
Following the ten minute soak interval/ the Instrument operator was
alerted/ the engine was re-started and the hot transient segment of
the test was begun. Sampling continued through the 505 second interval/
the horn was sounded/ sample flow was diverted and the hot transient
sample and background bags were analyzed. The test was then continued
through the 1372 second Driving Schedule/ the horn was sounded to
signal the end of sampling and a second hot stabilized sample was
collected and analyzed. It was then determined If a replicate exhaust
emission test was scheduled.
33
-------
Replicate exhaust emission tests were performed on a total of ten
vehicles from model-years 1966 through 1972. Replicate tests were
performed on 2 each of the 1970, 1971, and 1972 model-year vehicles
and 1 each of the 1966, 1967, 1968, and 1969 model-year vehicles.
Test replication was performed as an overall measure of test repeat-
Iblllty.
At the termination of testing, engine diagnostic procedures were
performed. A tach-dwell meter and timing light were attached to the
engine and engine rpm, ignition dwell and ignition timing were observed
and recorded. Rpm was measured in Drive for automatic transmissions
and neutral for manual transmissions. Idle carbon monoxide levels
were observed and recorded under engine Idling conditions.
2.6.1* SHED Evaporative Emission Test procedure
Evaporative emission measurements were performed according to the
procedures outlined In SAE J171, Measurement of Fuel Evaporative
Emissions from Gasoline Powered Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Using
the Enclosure Technique. SAE J171 is a procedure for measuring evapo-
rative emissions from fuel systems of passenger cars and light trucks.
Emissions are measured during a sequence of laboratory tests that
simulate typical vehicle useage In a metropolitan area during summer
months. Although any fuel could have been utilized for the conduct of
tests, fuel of average summer grade volatility was selected. Vehicle
and fuel system pre-conditioning prior to evaporative emission testing
has been described.
Following the prescribed temperature soak, all fuel was drained
from the vehicle. Fuel was pumped from the tank via the fuel pump
supply line. Pre-conditioned test fuel was then added to kQ% of tank
volume. Bottom filling was employed. A pint sample of test fuel was
then extracted from the tank and stored under refrigeration for later
analysis. Vehicle windows and baggage compartment were opened and the
vehicle was pushed Into the SHED. In the SHED, thermocouple leads
were connected and the fuel tank heater was situated. SHED doors were
-------
then closed and the dturnal loss phase of the evaporative procedure
was started. SHED ambient and fuel tank temperatures were monitored
continuously and SHED hydrocarbon levels were monltored at five minute
Intervals. Adjustments to the fuel tank heater were made as required
to achieve a constant rise.In tank fuel temperature from 60 to 8U
degrees F over a period of one hour. At the end of one hour the
diurnal loss phase of the test was terminated, the SHED doors were
opened, thermocouple leads and the tank heater were disconnected and
the vehicle was pushed out of the SHED and on the dynamometer in
preparation for cold starting. The vehicle was then cold started and
tested as described In 2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure.
Samples were obtained for the cold transient/ cold stabilized and hot
transient segments of the procedure.
At the completion of the 505 second hot transient segment of the
test/ the engine was allowed to remain running/ chocks and vehicle
tie-downs were removed/ the vehicle was driven off the dynamometer and
Into the SHED. The engine was shut-down before the vehicle entered the
SHED. With the vehicle In the SHED/ thermocouple leads were attached
and the SHED doors were closed. Evaporative hot loss emissions were
then monitored along with tank and ambient temperatures for a period
of one hour. A vehicle flow sheet was then consulted to determine If
evaporative test replication was required.
Evaporative emission tests were performed on 20 of the 1972 model
vehicles selected for exhaust emission tests. Replicate evaporative
emission tests were performed on two of the 1972 model-year vehicles
as a measure of test repeat!bl11ty.
At the conclusion of all testing/ engine diagnostic measurements
were performed on evaporative test vehicles. Diagnostic measurements
were performed as described In paragraph 2.6.3 for exhaust emission
test vehicles.
2.6.5 Dal1v Test Schedule
For testing In Denver/ the only site In which evaporative emission
35
-------
tests were performed by ATL, a total of five non-evaporative tests
were normally performed on non-evaporative test schedule days. On
evaporative test schedule days, a total of one evaporative test and
four non-evaporative tests were normally performed. At other sites,
Houston and Chicago, where evaporative testing was not required, two
shift per day operation was employed. Vehicle receipt and start-up
of testing shifts were coordinated In such a manner as to permit the
conduct of seven non-evaporative emission tests per shift or fourteen
tests per day. A summary of exhaust and evaporative emission proce-
dures relating to a specified number of vehicles for each work shift
Is as follows:
Pre-Test Preparation
1. Vehicles were scheduled to be delivered to the laboratory
within a one hour period. Acceptable vehicles were
Inspected, subjected to pre-test preparation procedures
and retired for the specified soak Interval.
Non-Evaporative Test Vehicles
1. Following the specified soak Interval, non-evaporative
emission test vehicles were cold started by applicable
procedures. Exhaust emissions from cold transient and
cold stabilized segments of the test were collected
and analyzed.
2. The vehicle was then shut down for the specified 10
minute hot soak Interval.
3. Following the 10 minute hot soak, the vehicle was hot
started. Exhaust emissions from hot transient and hot
stabilized segments of the test were collected and
analyzed.
k. Engine diagnostic procedures were then performed on
vehicles which had completed testing. Vehicles were
refueled as required and returned to owners.
Evaporative Test Vehicles
1. The vehicle fuel tank was drained, pre-conditioned fuel
was added to specified volume and In the SHED the vehicle
was tested for diurnal evaporative losses.
2. Federal cold start exhaust emissions during the cold
transient and cold stabl1Ized•segments were collected
and analyzed.
3. The vehicle was shut down for a 10 minute hot soak.
i*. Hot start eml sslons were collected and analyzed during
the hot transient segment of the test.
36
-------
5. In the SHED, evaporative emissions were measured during
the hot loss phase of the evaporative emission test
procedure.
6. Engine diagnostic procedures were then performed on
vehicles which had completed testing. Vehicles were
refueled as required and returned to owners.
2.7 DATA HANDLING
In order to ensure the overall validity and accuracy of the study,
an elaborate system of data reporting, auditing, verification, and
processing procedures were instituted. These procedures have been
generally described in preceeding sections and are described in more
detal1 as follows:
2.7.1 Data Col lection
For the orderly collection and processing of data It was necessary
to devise data sheets which were compatible with data processing and
reporting procedures. Data was collected during various phases of
vehicle handling and testing by several personnel.
Procurement personnel retained and utilized post-cards returned
from mass mailings as reference to select and schedule vehicles for
testing in compliance with sample requirements. Procurement personnel
also utilized the Customer and Vehicle Information form, a sample of
which Is shown in Figure 2.8, to indicate tests and test conditions
to which the vehicle was required to be subjected. Applicable spaces
were completed by procurement personnel and are defined as follows:
EVAP?
Yes, indicating an evaporative emission test was
requlred.
No, indicating an evaporative emission test was
not required.
REPL?
Yes, indicating the vehicle was scheduled for a
replIcate test.
No, indicating the vehicle was not scheduled for
a replicate test.
applicable to both evaporative and non-evaporative test replication.
AC LOAD
Yes, indicating the vehicle was to be tested with
an additional 10! road load to simulate air
condi tlonlng.
No, indicating the vehicle was to be tested without
the simulated 10| load.
37
-------
CUSTOMER AND VEHICLE INFORMATION
VEHICLE INFORMATION
EVAP ? REPL 7 AC LOAD ODOMETER DATE
'
VEH f
CYL CID TRN BBL C R
141 \1\2\2\
VEH MAKE
EM C EV C IN WT
l l£l
VEH MODEL
HP
LICENSE *
VEH YEAR
11.121212:1
STATE
FEDERAL ID
AC PRESENT ? FUEL TANK CAP.
FUEL TANK AS REC'D
INDICATE (|)
(E
y
/
I IF)
Chart Proofed
Punched JkC£MU££
HOME PHONE 4
STATE:
ZIP
WORK PHONE
1972 PAINTED/UNDERCOATED PAST 60 DAYS? A/Q EVAP TEST ONLY
SHEDULING
SCHEDULED
INCOMING DATE! J2-28- 73
PROMISED COMPLETION DATg {2
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
TIME
Form ET-1272
Figure 2.8
-------
Customer and Vehicle Information sheets were also used by procurement
personnel to indicate, in advance of vehicle acceptance, information
relative to the vehicle which had been supplied by the owner. Infor-
mation supplied In advance by the vehicle owner and filled in by
procurement personnel are: . :
CYL where 8 Indicates an 8 cylinder engine
6 indicates a 6 cylinder engine
i* Indicates a k cylinder engine
CID which Indicates the cubic Inch displacement of the
engine rounded to the nearest whole cubic inch
TRN where 01 Indicates an automatic transmission
03 indicates a standard 3 speed transmission
OU Indicates a standard k speed transmission
BBL where 00 indicates a fuel Injected engine
01 indicates a single barrel carburetor
02 indicates a two barrel carburetor
Ok Indicates a four barrel carburetor
VEH MAKE which Indicates the make of the vehicle as
FORD, CHEVROLET, PONTIAC, etc.
VEH MODEL which indicates the model of the vehicle as
IMPALA, FAIRLANE, GTO, etc.
VEH YEAR which Indicates the vehicle model-year as
1969, 1972, etc.
Prior to acceptance of the vehicle at the time of initial inspection,
the above noted items were checked by inspection personnel. If
verified, the vehicle was accepted. If discrepancies existed,
procurement personnel were consulted. The vehicle was then accepted
if considered an appropriate substitute or rejected In favor of a
more acceptable vehicle. Vehicle and equipment substitutions were
indicated In accordance with changes as required. Vehicle inspection
personnel then utilized the Customer and Vehicle Information form
along with a Vehicle Inspection form and Test and Loan Vehicle Agree-
ments to continue with Inspection and pre-test preparation operations.
All forms then accompanied the vehicle through the step by step prepar-
ation and testing procedures.
In addition to providing Information relating to the vehicle, the
Customer and Vehicle Information form'contained test scheduling and
personal information with respect to the owner. Personal information
39
-------
was retained for purposes of Savings Bond Issuance. The form also
served to provide a record of performance and completion of data
verification and auditing procedures. Upon completion of such tasks,
personnel were required to Indicate completion by signing off In
appropriate spaces shown as "Chart Proofed, Punched, Input Proofed",
etc. on the Customer and Vehicle Information form. The remaining
blocks of the form were completed by test personnel prior to testing
of the subject vehicle.
For collection of exhaust and evaporative emission test data,
data forms were designed and utilized. Samples are shown In Figures
2.9 and 2.10. For emission analysis, Instrument ranges were assigned
range codes. Range codes are Indicated by the first digit of the
number. The following digits, two to the left of the decimal point,
Indicate recorder deflection In percent of full scale. The digit to
the right of the decimal point Indicates the corresponding fraction
of percent of full scale. Other data taken and entered on data sheets
are self-explanatory.
2.7.2 Data Processing
As part of data processing procedures, verification and auditing
procedures were instituted. Procedures were developed as follows:
1. The Instrument operator recorded emission data on as
many Instrument ranges as practical. An up-scale
reading was selected to represent emission data.
Range code and recorder deflection was noted adjacent
to recorder pen traces and on raw data sheet.
2. An auditor (non-operator) then examined completed
emission data charts and sheets and verified range
codes and recorder deflections. Corrections were
made as required.
3. A computer input tape was then punched from verified
data, and raw data was placed In a temporary
computer storage file.
U. Raw data was retrieved from the temporary computer
file and proof-read against raw data sheets. This
procedure provided assurance that Input and trans-
mission errors had not occured. If errors had
occured, corrections were made to temporary files
and the process was repeated.
-------
Date
Test No
EPA-3 EXHAUST EMISSION TEST
Operator
Barometer
50 MPH Load
Tlmlng
Obs. Cold Tran. Sample
Obs. Cold Tran. Bkgnd
Obs. Cold Stab. Sample
Obs. Cold Stab. Bkgnd
Obs. Hot Tran. Sample
Obs. Hot Tran. Bkgnd
Obs. Hot Stab. Sample
Obs. Hot Stab. Bkgnd
HC
Dr I ver
Conditions
Temp
Dry/Wet
Time
NOX
Motes
Blower
Rev.
In.Pr.
(18),
Figure 2.9
-------
To--, t Nun-, her
SHE:J RESULTS
Ba ronte t c-'
//
Cart Level
S tar t '//.
UO'i TC •-
For!
Vehicle Mo
Operator
Fuel
i. this t*io second run of a replicate pair?
T Inic
Background
In! t Jl
I., m 1 n .
10
Ib
20
25
30
35
MO
US
so
55
00
' DIUUNAL
En c.l o
T e"ib
7JT°
72"
67°
616
&r
^°
£9*
70*
?o°
ir
11°
-72°
73'
73'
1 nt
Tnnk
Tpr.ip
^x^
$?'
63*
(~5*
£
-------
5. After data was verified, proofed, corrected and re-
proofed, emission calculations were performed by
applicable computer programs.
6. An emission data output sheet was then printed by
computer operations and scrutinized point by point
for apparent errors. All questionable data was
circled. Output sheets containing questionable
data were returned to step 2.'for additional
analysis and the entire process was repeated.
7. Acceptable data was moved from temporary computer
storage to permanent files for subsequent processing
and statistical analysis and reporting.
2.7.3 Calculation of Results
Exhaust emission test results were calculated In accordance with
procedures outlined In applicable Federal Registers for testing by the
1972 and 1975 Federal Test Procedures. Emissions as reported are in
terms of grams per mile for mass emissions of carbon monoxide (CO),
carbon dioxide (CC>2)/ hydrocarbons (HO and oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
Tailpipe emissions of carbon monoxide are reported as measured in
terms of percent CO by volume.
Evaporative emission test results are reported for hydrocarbons
in terms of grams per test In accordance with procedures outlined
In SAE J171.
it 3
-------
3. TEST- RESULTS
Summary test results are shown In detail in the appendices. It
should be pointed put again that test results reported herein are but
a portion of a more comprehensive presentation Involving/ not three/
but six U.S. cities. A discussion of test results Is meaningful only
to the extent that the results relate to compliance with emission
standards or as they relate to the three cities investigated.
3.1 OVERALL EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS
The care with which the program was designed has been described.
Similarly/ • the method of sample se. action was described. From this
It can be assumed that the sample tested is representative of emissions
from vehicle model-years 1966 through 1972 Inclusive. Overall test
results (Appendix 1), yield the following data by city In grams per
mi le.
Test
Procedure City HC CO CO 2
Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.
1972 Denver 7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2 2.72 1.33
1975 6.86 5.00 98.9 «*9.2 U95.U 131.1 2.80 1.37
1972 Houston 6.20 5.1*0 77.1 5U.O 5U2.2 136.7 i*.19 1.80
1975 5.1*8 U.76 6U.7 UU.6 526.0 127.5 i*.32 1.79
1972 Chicago 5.63 U. 89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1 i».19 1.72
1975 5.15 I*. 58 59.0 3U.2 505.3 126.7 I*. 30 1.79
3.1.1 Exhaust Emission Test Results bv Manufacturer
Upon examination of exhaust emission test results by vehicle
manufacturer (Appendix 2)/ the following tables were constructed:
Highest and Lowest Emissions
Test Procedure
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
Citv
Denver
Houston
Chicago
Mean HC Emissions by
Maximum
CMC (8.51)
CMC (7.37)
Ford(6.65)
Ford(5.81)
Ford(6.6U)
Ford (6. 15) ;
Manufacturer
Mln Imum
Ntssan(3.82)
N!ssan(3.i*l)
Nissan(2.25)
Nissan(2.3<*)
Nlssan(2.8i*)
Nlssah(2.60)
-------
Test Procedure
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
Test Procedure
1972
1975
1972
1975
1972
1975
(LLJtjd
Denver
Houston
Chicago
CItv
Denver
Houston
Chi cago
Mean CO Emissions
Maximum
Chrys1er(lU2.8)
Chrysler(128.5)
Chrysler (8U.5)
GMC (69.5)
AMC (111.2)
AMC (102.7)
Mean NOK Emissions
Maximum
Ford (3.10)
Ford (3.23)
Toyota (U.i»3)
ChrylserU.62)
Ford U.95)
Ford (5.07)
by Manufacturer
Mi nlmum
NissanU9.1)
Nissan(U3.U)
Nissan(15.9)
Nlssan(13.U)
Nissan(21.1)
Nissan(17.i»)
bv Manufacturer
Mini mum
Nissan(1.95)
Nlssan(2.01)
VW (3.00)
VW (2.85)
Toyota(2.18)
Toyota(2.15)
In paragraphs 3.1.2 through 3.1.7 which follow, exhaust emission
test results are discussed relative to seven variables. With respect
to the discussion It should be pointed out that emissions are dependent
on not one but all of the variables presented and discussed. In this
respect conclusions which were arrived at are not necessarily totally
valid.
3.1.2 Exhaust Emission Test Results bv Model-Year
Upon examination of exhaust emission test results (Appendix 3)
the following general trends In emissions by model year are observed:
In all three cities (Denver, Houston and Chicago):
Emissions of HC and CO tend to decrease from model-years 1966 through
1972 while emissions of NOX tend to Increase. Emissions of C02 also
tend to Increase.
3.1.3 Exhaust Emission Test Results bv Number of Cylinders
Upon examination of exhaust emission test results by the number
of engine cylinders (Appendix U) the following general trends In
emissions are observed:
In al1 three ci ties:
Emissions of HC/ CO/ C02 and NOX tend to decrease with a decreasing
number of engine cylinders.
-------
3.1.U Exhaust Emission Test Results by Engine Displacement
Upon examination of test results by engine displacement In cubic
Inches (Appendix 5), the following general trends In emissions are
o
observed.
In al1 three ci ties:
HC and CO emissions are greater from engines In the 251 to 300 cubic
Inch category and in the 300 to 399 cubic inch category than from
engines less than 251 cubic inches and from engines greater than 399
cubic Inches.
CO2 and NOX emissions generally Increase with Increasing engine size.
3.1.5 Exhaust Emission Test Results bv Vehicle Weight
Upon examination of test results by vehicle weight (Appendix 6)
the following general trends In emissions are observed:
In al1 three clties:
HC and CO emissions from vehicles under 2000 Ibs tend to be higher
than emissions from vehicles In the 2001 to 2500 Ib category.
HC and CO emissions tend to increase from vehicles over 2001 Ibs with
increasing vehicle weight to about the UOOO Ib category at which point
HC emissions tend to decrease with increasing weight.
C02,and NOX emissions tend to Increase with Increasing vehlcle.weight.
3.1.6 Exhaust Emission Test Results bv Transmission Type
Upon examination of test results by transmission type (Appendix 7),
the following general trends In emissions are observed:
In all three sites:
HC/ CO, CC>2 and NOX emissions were lower from vehicles equipped with
manual transmissions than from vehicles equipped with automatic
transmissions.
3.1.7 Exhaust Emission Test Results bv Carburetor
Upon examination of test results by carburetor (Appendix 8), the
following general trends in emissions are observed:
In all three si tes:
HC and CO emissions were lowest for vehicles equipped with fuel
Injection.
NOX emissions were highest for vehicles equipped with fuel injection.
CO emissions tend to Increase with an Increase In the number of carbur-
etor Venturis, while the converse was true for NOX emissions.
-------
HC emissions tended to I.ncrease from a one barrel to a four barrel to
a two barrel carburetor.
3.1.8 Exhaust Emission Test Repeat 1 bl 1 1 tv (Replication)
As discussed, replicate exhaust emission tests were performed on
ten vehicles In each of the three cities. Since the object of the
replicate testing Is to determine that the tests are actually repeat-
able and, therefore, meaningful, the paired "T" test can be applied
to test for any differences between the first emission test and the
replicate emission test. Examination of replicate exhaust emission
tests (Appendix 9) Indicates the following:
In Denver:
At a 0.05 significance level there Is no dlscernable difference
between the first emission test and the replicate test for any of
the emissions measured.
In Houston:
Again, at a 0.05 significance level there Is no difference between
tests.
In Chicago:
At a 0.05 significance level HC, CO, and NOX emissions show no
difference between tests. C02 does indicate some difference between
the first test and the replicate.
However, when the Chicago C02 test Is compared with the other two
cities it Indicates that the difference resulted more from a standard
deviation decrease than a mean variation.
3.1.9 Vehicles Meeting 1972 Federal 1 Exhaust Emission Standards
Upon examination of test results with reference to the 1972
Federal Exhaust Emission Standards (Appendix 10), the following Is
I ndl cated :
In Denver:
With respect to the 1972 model-year vehicles tested;
were found to emit hydrocarbons at a level below the 1972 Federal
Standard of 3.i» grams per mile.
9% were found to emit carbon monoxide at a level below the 1972
Federal Standard of 39 grams per mile.
3% were found to emit both hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide below the
Federal Standards of 3.U and 39 grams per mile respectively.
With respect to all vehicles tested in Denver:
-------
k% were found to emit hydrocarbons at a level below the Federal
Standard of 3.U grams per mile.
3% were found to emit carbon monoxide at a level below the Federal
Standard of 39 grams per mile.
Less than 1% were found to emit both hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
at levels below the Federal Standards of 3.U and 39 grams per mile
respect! vel y.
In Houston:
With respect to the 1972 model-year vehicles tested;
U9% were found to emit hydrocarbons at a level below the 1972 Federal
Standard of 3.U grams per mile.
511 were found to emit carbon monoxide at a level below the 1972
Federal Standard of 39 grams per mile.
3U% were found to emit both hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide below the
Federal Standards of 3.U and 39 grams per mile respectively.
With respect to all vehicles tested in Houston:
20| were found to emit hydrocarbons at a level below the Federal
Standard of 3.U grams per mile.
22% were found to emit carbon monoxide at a level below the Federal
Standard of 39 grams per mile.
were found to emit both hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide at levels
below the Federal Standards of 3.U and 39 grams per mile respectively.
In Chicago:
With respect to the 1972 model-year vehicles tested;
77% were found to emit hydrocarbons at a level below the 1972 Federal
Standard of 3.
-------
I*. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A sincere thank you is extended to the Dollar-A-Day Rental Car Systems
for their efficient service In providing courtesy vehicles In the
Denver, Houston and Chicago areas/ with a very special acknowledgement
to June Samuels and staff of the Denver Office for the unusually
responsive and courteous service.
The assistance of Hibbert/Laman is acknowledged with respect to its
contributions toward maintaining rigid project schedules, with a
sincere thank you to Jim Kramer for his invaluable contributions.
The support of the program by the EPA/ Division of Certification and
Surveillance/ Is acknowledged with a very special acknowledgement and
thanks to the EPA Project Officer, John White/ and to Matt Macocha
and Tom Bejma of the EPA for their prompt and courteous assistance.
51
-------
APPENDICES
53
-------
CONTENTS OF APPENDICES
Appendix No. Table No. Emission Results bv Cltv Versus Page
1
2
3
It
5
6
7
8
9
10
1A
2A
3A
UA
5A
6A
7A
8A
9A
. IB
, 2B
, 3B
. <»B
, 5B
, 6B
, 7B
, 8B
, 9B
10A
Vehicle Make
Vehicle Manufacturer
Model Year
Number of Cylinders
01 splacement
inertia Weight
Transmission Type
Carburet ion
Results of Replicate Tests
Number of Vehicles Meeting
57
63
69
75
81
87
93
99
105
1972 Standards 111
AppendIx No. Jable No. DescrIotion Page
11 11 Evaporative Emission Test
Results for Denver 11U
12 12 Vehicle Information, Legend 115
Denver 116
Houston 121*
Chicago 132
13 13A 1972 Procedure, Exhaust
Emission Test Results by Vehicle
Denver IkO
Houston 1U6
Chicago 152
13 13B 1975 Procedure, Exhaust
Emission Test Results by Vehicle
Denver 158
Houston 16U
Chicago 170
Ik Ik Evaporative Emission Test
Results and Fuel Analysis 176
55
-------
TABLE. 1A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK .
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DAT SUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
* OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.88
7.19
5.07
9.75
9.68
3.82
7.64
7.00
6.32
8.23
9.06
3.17
8.05
7.11
5.02
6.76
1 .89
3.25
1 .39
8.60
5.37
0.51
2. 89
2.97
o.oo
4.85
9.90
0.00
4.54
2.13
0.83
5.00
CO
MEAN S.
104.0
136.9
131*0
117.3
175.4
49.1
136.9
96.5
95.8
111.4
11 1.7
58.5
136.8
105.0
75.9
81.7
38
53
33
66
88
27
52
41
0
59
53
0
57
40
8
37
D.
.7
.9
.8
.6
.4
.2
.3
.5
.0
• 0
.9
.0
.8
.7
.0
.6
CC2
MEAN S«
409.3
575.1
750.0
512.5
607.0
312.4
51 1.4
501 .9
636.6
598.4
612.0
333.2
452.9
585.7
361.1
295.9
71
130
1 1 1
123
64
12
122
120
0
67
90
0
1 17
75
109
65
D.
.6
.2
.7
.7
• 6
.5
.9
.7
.0
.1
.8
.0
.8
.9
.6
.9
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1 .99
2.72
3.49
2.43
2.19
1.95
2.51
3.04
4.89
3.15
2.83
2.32
2.73
3*13
2.61
2.16
0.73
1 .62
1 .60
1 .27
1 .46
0*1 1
1.14
1.18
0.00
1 .54
0.92
0.00
1.78
1 .46
1 .40
1 .43
ALL VEHICLES 170
7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2 2.72 1.33
57
-------
TABLE 1A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
CLDSMCBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PCNTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
# OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
5
5
4
7
7
2
6
6
4
5
6
3
4
5
3
5
.37
.78
.08
.42
.71
.25
.37
.87
.71
.81
.05
.63
.19
.41
.48
.99
5.12
3.42
1.98
7.46
4.70
0.23
3.13
6.85
o.oo
2.65
3.63
0.00
1 .04
2.52
2.16
5.90
CO
MEAN S.D.
53.7
94.8
71.6
84.8
102.9
15.9
110.8
73.9
87.6
80.8
86.8
53.3
56.4
67.5
24.4
61.4
38.5
58.3
35.4
56.9
39.6
10.3
108.8
52.1
o.o
54.0
47.3
0.0
19.8
31.7
4.7
36.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
444.
636.
731.
536.
596.
315.
532.
524.
702.
673.
629.
399.
508.
612.
360.
324.
8
7
5
7
3
5
5
8
1
9
3
5
2
8
2
1
93.8
127.8
88.3
113.1
132.7
50.1
109.6
109.5
0.0
90.8
111 .5
0.0
88.6
139*0
30.7
41.6
NCXC
MEAN S.D.
3.47
5.09
4.83
3.72
4.04
3.53
3.63
4.16
5.81
4.83
4.66
4.71
5.16
4.56
4.43
3.00
1.77
1.96
1.84
1 .42
0.67
0.13
2.16
2.03
0.00
2.27
2.42
0.00
1.34
1.68
0.73
1.00
ALL VEHICLES 170
6.20 5.40 77.1 54.0 542.2 136.7 4.19 1.80
58
-------
TABLE 1A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
# OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.90
4.78
3.39
5.98
5.04
2.84
5.12
6.25
2.92
9.13
4.94
1.73
3.85
6.87
5.11
4.69
2.56
1.91
2.44
3.45
0.78
0.65
2.65
6.89
0.00
10.66
2.82
o.oo
1 .21
7.25
5.72
2.31
C
MEAN
111.
80.
62.
75.
72.
21 •
65.
58.
46.
51.
64.
41.
62.
68.
75.
53.
2
4
4
5
1
1
4
9
5
7
2
9
6
1
1
7
0
S.D.
61 .8
39.8
58.8
45.2
35.3
14.2
27.6
33.8
o.o
23.4
30.3
0.0
32.3
20.4
93.9
21.9
CC2
MEAN S.D.
449.
599.
761 .
499.
588.
336.
488.
517.
732.
602.
595.
406.
465.
589.
315.
308.
2
7
6
5
4
3
8
2
5
8
9
3
5
9
5
8
74.2
123.1
197.9
105.2
68.7
16.7
112.3
114.8
0.0
97.6
88.0
0.0
77.3
94.6
66.8
58.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.63
4.33
4.96
3.53
4.21
4.70
4.67
4.68
4.98
6.29
4.54
1.26
5.04
4.55
2.18
2.29
1.24
1 .50
2.92
1.45
1.30
0.72
1.56
1.65
0.00
2.12
1.18
0.00
1.60
1.32
1 .56
0.74
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.63 4.89
67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1
4.19 1.72
59
-------
TABLE IB
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT I AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
# OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
MEAN S
5.40
6. 27
4.50
8.28
8.02
3.41
6.37
6.24
5.85
7.73
8.50
2.72
7.12
6.04
4.60
6.13
1
2
1
7
3
0
2
2
0
4
9
0
4
1
0
5
.D.
.79
.73
.36
.38
.62
.32
.28
.53
.00
.33
.70
.00
.08
.67
.58
.04
C
MEAN
97.0
117.9
106.6
101 .4
150.4
43.4
123.5
84.7
94.4
96.7
100.1
47.5
125.4
88.6
68.6
76.9
0
S.D.
42.4
49.0
17.5
57.6
70.2
21 .9
51.6
34.1
o.o
60.6
51 .7
0.0
58.3
34.8
14.3
37.4
CCS
MEAN S.D.
398*8
559.4
724.8
492.5
590.9
301.0
489.9
484.0
608.1
578.7
592.0
322.9
439.9
565.6
344.9
287.9
72.4
122.4
106.6
117.5
58.8
13.4
107.9
114.4
0.0
67.1
92.4
0.0
114.4
71 .0
105.1
62.3
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
• 04
.99
.76
.45
.37
.01
.53
.18
.65
.29
.89
.20
.72
.28
.56
.07
0.87
1.73
1.54
1.30
1.40
0.07
1*16
1.15
0.00
1.71
1.08
0.00
1 .75
1.52
1 .32
1.42
ALL VEHICLES 170
6.66 5.00 98.9 49.2 495.4 131.1
2.80 1.37
60
-------
TABLE IB
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF
VEH.
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET "
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.19
5.40
3.43
6.60
5.99
2.34
5.15
6.00
3*92
5.16
5.30
3.02
3 . 63
4.75
3.28
5.77
4.55
3.67
1.70
6.82
2.98
0*68
2.37
5.45
0.00
2.28
3.14
0.00
0.83
2.26
2.06
6.19
C
MEAN
49.5
78.2
60.6
70.9
83.1
13.4
90.5
61.6
67.4
62.7
77.9
41.8
47.2
56.2
20.0
56.5
0
S.D.
38.2
47.7
35.7
46.1
31.4
8.7
83.0
43.6
o.o
45.6
45.8
0.0
19.4
26.1
1.1
36.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
429.5
611.6
698.0
522.0
578.7
305.5
525.1
511.3
690.2
658.1
606.7
389.0
491.7
585.6
351.6
320.1
87.9
113*2
87.3
103.3
114.2
43.3
105.3
100.9
0*0
92.0
116.5
0.0
77.3
125.0
25.9
41.8
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.52
5.09
4.74
3.87
4.35
3*50
4.03
4.38
6.42
5.13
4.64
4.84
5.21
4.69
4.31
2.85
1.76
1.80
1.81
1.35
0.38
0.02
2.07
2.15
0.00
2.53
2.34
o.oo
1.22
1*68
0.78
0.95
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.48 4.76 64.7 44*6 526*0 127.5 4*32 1.79
61
-------
TABLE IB
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
0 OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.40
4.35
3.22
5.35
4.58
2.60
4.60
5.82
3.24
8.23
4.63
1.69
3.53
6.41
4.51
4.29
2.50
1.73
2.42
2.92
0.68
0.64
2.28
6.58
0*00
10.20
2.78
OoOO
1.20
6.86
4.82
2.30
C
MEAN
102.7
67.8
57.9
65.2
67.6
17.4
58.3
50.5
58.9
43.9
58.1
41.8
55.7
61.1
70.7
49.4
0
S.D.
65.2
34.0
59.7
35.5
38.2
9.7
25.1
29.3
0.0
19.9
27.4
0.0
32.9
20.7
89.0
22.4
C02
MEAN S.D.
440*4
585.0
728.3
488.9
579.2
332.6
481.9
506.0
712.1
592.7
579.6
401.5
457.1
577.7
311.0
303.9
77.3
121.3
176.9
99*2
65.1
19.0
109.5
110.7
o.o
96.1
85.1
0.0
77.4
90.1
69.0
58.1
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
2.84
4.51
5.05
3.61
4.30
4.90
4.84
4.79
4.55
6.54
4.58
1.56
5.11
4.79
2.15
2.16
1.40
1.51
3.26
1.43
1.27
0.89
1.59
1.70
0.00
2.30
1.21
o.oo
1.67
1.39
1.56
0.70
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.15 4.58
59.0 34.2 505.3 126.7
4.30 1.79
62
-------
TABLE 2A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
f OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
H
MEAN
5.88
8*14
7.19
8.51
3.82
5.02
6.76
C
S.D.
1.89
4.00
3.28
7.21
0.51
0.83
5.00
C
MEAN
104.0
142.8
98.9
1 17.3
49.1
75.9
81.7
C
S.D.
38.7
60.0
43.8
57.7
27.2
8.0
37.6
CC
MEAN
409.3
499.1
520.7
557.4
312.4
361 .1
295.9
>2
S.D.
71 .6
122.5
1 18.5
126.9
12.5
109.6
65.9
NO
MEAN
1.99
2.56
3.10
8.70
1.95
2.61
2.16
XC
S.D.
0.73
1 .47
1 .24
1.34
0.11
1.40
1 .43
ALL VEHICLES 170
7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2
2.72 1.33
63
-------
TABLE 2 A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
iLL VEHICLES
f OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
170
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.
5.
6.
6.
2.
3.
5.
6.
37
57
65
43
25
48
99
20
5.12
2.93
6.27
5.66
0.23
2.16
5.90
5.40
C
MEAN
53.7
84.5
75.3
82.5
15.9
24*4
61.4
77.1
0
S.D.
38-5
73.1
51.2
50.8
10.3
4.7
36.0
54.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
444.8
531.1
553.2
585.2
315.5
360.2
324.1
542.2
93.
104.
120*
129.
50.
30.
41.
136.
8
0
5
4
1
7
6
7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.47
4.40
4.30
4.26
3.53
4.43
3.00
4.19
1.77
1 .76
2.05
1.76
0.13
0.73
1.00
1.80
-------
TABLE 2 A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1
\
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
» OF
l/EH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
H
MEAN
5.90
4*52
6.64
5.63
2.84
5.11
4.69
C
S.D.
2.56
1.91
7.49
4.1 1
0.65
5.72
2.31
C
MEAN
111*2
65.1
57.5
72.3
21.1
75.1
53.7
0
S.D.
61.8
29.9
31 >8
39.3
14.2
93.9
21 .9
CC
MEAN
449.2
493.4
536.2
554.9
336.3
315.5
308.8
J2
S.D.
74.2
97.8
118.3
126.0
16.7
66.8
58.0
NO
MEAN
2.63
4.77
4.95
4.00
4.70
2.18
2.29
XC
S.D.
1 .24
1.51
1.79
1.57
0.72
1.56
0.74
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1
4.19 1.72
65
-------
TABLE 2B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
f OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
HC
MEAN S . D .
5
6
6
7
3
4
6
• 40
.97
.47
.37
.41
.60
.13
1.79
3.33
2.86
6.40
0.32
0.58
5.04
C
MEAN
97.0
128.5
86.9
101.1
43.4
68.6
76.9
0
S.D.
42.4
56.0
38.6
50.5
21.9
14.3
37.4
CC2
MEAN S.D.
398.
482.
502.
537.
301.
344.
287.
8
4
3
9
0
9
9
72.4
114.6
112.9
121.9
13.4
105.1
62.3
NO
MEAN
2.04
2.59
3.23
2.80
2.01
2.56
2.07
XC
S.D.
0.87
1 .44
1 .24
1 .41
0.07
1 .32
1 .42
ALL VEHICLES 170
6.86 5.00 98.9 49.2 495.4 131.1
2.80 1.37
66
-------
TABLE 2B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
» OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
MEAN
5.19
4.58
5.81
5.73
2.34
3.28
5.77
HC
S.D.
4.55
2.07
5.00
5.20
0.68
2.06
6.19
MEAN
49«5
69.4
61.9
69.5
13.4
20.0
56.5
CO
S.D.
38.2
56.6
42.8
42.5
8.7
1.1
36.9
C
MEAN
429.5
517.9
539.4
564.8
305.5
351.6
320.1
02
1
1
S.D.
87.9
95.5
14.0
19.0
43.3
25.9
41.8
N
MEAN
3.52
4.62
4.55
4.35
3.50
4.31
2.85
OXC
S
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
.D.
.76
.59
.19
.68
.02
.78
.95
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.48 4.76 64.7 44.6 526.0 127.5 4*32 1.79
67
-------
TABLE 2B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
* OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
HC
MEAN S«D.
5.
4.
6*
5.
2.
4.
4.
40
10
15
14
60
51
29
8.50
1.69
7.14
3.75
0*64
4.82
2.30
C
MEAN
102.7
58.6
49.7
63.3
17.4
70.7
49.4
0
S» Do
65.2
29.9
27.6
32.7
9.7
89.0
22.4
C02
MEAN S.D.
440.4
485*4
524.9
541 .5
332*6
311.0
303-9
77.3
96.2
114.6
119.0
19.0
69.0
58.1
NOXC
MEAN S
2*84
4.88
5.07
4.12
4.90
2.15
2.16
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
.D.
.40
.55
• 88
.60
.89
.56
.70
ALL VEHICLES 170 5*15 4.58 59.0 34.2 505-3 126.7 4.30 1.79
68
-------
TABLE 3A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEARFACTURER
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
f OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES 170 7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2 2.72 1»33
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
10.
15.
8.
6.
6.
5.
5.
97
23
25
86
36
89
61
7.41
9.55
5.20
1 .60
1.71
2.18
4.34
132.7
172.0
121.9
113.9
102.9
92.0
90.4
55.7
51.4
82°8
42=5
37.8
44.1
35.8
465.3
418.6
539.6
492.0
520.2
513.7
576.5
129
94
120
125
105
152
154
.3
.4
-3
.5
.9
.3
.3
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
.40
.67
.67
o79
.18
.76
.00
1 .57
0.90
1 el 9
io38
i .09
1 .34
Io37
69
-------
TABLE 3A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEARFACTURER
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
e OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1966 17
1967 18
1968 21
1969 22
1970 27
1971 30
1972 35
ALL VEHICLES 170 6.20 5.40 77.1 54.0 542.2 136.7 4.19 1*80
9.62
9.27
8.05
5.35
6.49
4.07
3.98
3.56
8.33
6.78
1 .69
6.28
1.55
4.57
128.
98.
86.
75.
80.
64.
44.
5
4
5
4
7
5
7
68
37
53
34
69
48
25
.6
.1
.0
.4
.6
.4
.7
472
458
528
540
532
566
615
.3
.4
.9
.5
.4
.1
•3
104
81
104
89
131
174
146
• 9
.2
.6
.2
.9
.2
• 8
2.88
3.60
3.87
5.07
3.94
4.52
4.68
1.46
1.53
1.76
1.73
1.78
1.71
1.81
70
-------
TABLE 3A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEARFACTURER
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
« OF
VEH.
MEAN
HC
s.
D.
C
MEAN
0
s.
.D.
C
MEAN
02
S
.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971 , ,
1972
ALL VEHICLES 170 5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516*3 132.1 4.19 1.72
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
11.
7.
7.
5.
4.
4.
3.
75
42
04
51
16
54
03
9.77
3.27
6.34
3.07
1.23
2.49
1.07
96.
90.
68.
74.
60.
61.
44.
6
6
7
8
0
7
4
44.8
36.5
31.9
48.9
28.0
33.5
26.2
444
460
489
508
509
507
604
.1
.5
.4
.4
.5
.2
.1
94.4
104.9
104.1
91.8
106.8
142.2
166.4
3*44
3.69
4.25
5*12
4.39
3.75
4.44
1.78
2.01
1.91
1.91
1 .65
1.41
1.35
71
-------
TABLE 3B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
* OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NCXC
MEAN S.D.
1966 17
1967 18
1966 21
1969 22
1970 27
1971 30
1972 35
ALL VEHICLES 170 6.86 5.00 98.9 49.2 495.4 131*1 2.80 1.37
9.78
13.92
6.92
5.97
5.55
5.19
4.75
6.60
9.46
3.68
1 .28
1 .56
1.75
2.42
123
157
101
97
87
80
80
.6
.5
• 8
.8
.5
• 3
.4
54.3
51.8
65.6
38.1
31*2
37.3
32.5
441
407
518
476
503
494
559
• 4
.0
• 8
.7
.3
• 8
• 3
121
89
108
119
103
145
148
.7
.9
• 3
.9
• 0
.1
.9
2.30
1.77
2.87
2.93
3.32
2.74
3.08
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.60
.10
.25
.47
.11
• 31
.39
72
-------
TABLE 3B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES 170
t OF
VEH.
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
HC
MEAN S.D.
8.42
8.20
7.39
4.68
5.47
3.71
3*52
3.48
7.56
6.57
1.45
4.47
1.48
4.09
C
MEAN
106.6
85.9
71.7
62.2
66*3
55.5
37.4
0
S.D.
45.8
35.3
41.2
29.5
56.7
45.3
23.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
465.7
448.2
513.5
526.6
519.5
543*1
593.1
95.4
73.4
99.9
83.8
125.1
161.0
139.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.00
3.70
4.22
5.30
4.20
4.46
4.69
1.38
1.54
1 .69
1.76
1.89
1.68
1 .81
5.48 4.76 64.7 44.6 526.0 127.5 4.32 1.79
73
-------
TABLE 3B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
* OF
VEH.
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
HC
MEAN S.D.
10.99
6.84
6.63
4.80
3.73
4.06
2.81
9.37
2.99
6.09
2.31
1.13
1.97
0.96
C
MEAN
89.5
80.3
61.3
61.9
49.4
55.8
40.4
0
S.D.
45.1
31.9
29.0
36.2
23.5
31.2
24.9
C02
MEAN S.D.
437.3
469.3
478.5
498.2
500.0
496*6
588.7
96*6
102.9
99.4
86.3
103.5
138.9
155.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.49
3.82
4.43
5.31
4.55
3*80
4.47
1.88
2.15
2.00
1.89
1.67
1.43
1.43
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.15 4.58 59.0 34.2 505.3 126.7
4.30 1.79
-------
TABLE 4A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
8
6
4
* OF
VEH.
128
22
20
HC
MEAN
8.32
6.83
5.69
S
6
3
3
.D.
.14
.16
.68
C
MEAN
119.6
105.1
75.3
0
S-D.
56.3
52.3
29.2
C02
MEAN
570.4
360*1
315.0
s.
102
48
67
D.
.1
• 2
.9
NOXC
MEAN
2.90
2.19
2.12
S
1
1
1
.D.
.33
.23
.15
ALL VEHICLES 170 7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2 2.72 L33
75
-------
TABLE 4A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
* OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S>D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
8 129 6.60 5.78 84.6 56.8 594<-8 109.2 4.39 1.89
6 21 5.20 3.14 59.8 38.9 413*3 49.2 3.81 1.53
4 20 4.63 4.38 46.9 30.9 338.3 49.4 3.31 1.02
ALL VEHICLES 170 6.20 5.40 77.1 54.0 542.2 136.7 4.19 1.80
76
-------
TABLE 4A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
US. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
* OF
VEH.
131
19
20
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.
5.
4.
85
42
40
5.08
5.27
2.76
CO
MEAN S.D.
69.7
60.9
54.8
37.8
40.5
38.2
C02
MEAN S>
565.2
385.6
320.6
106
42
52
D.
.0
.6
.7
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.
3.
2.
50
89
48
1 .63
1 .78
1.13
8
6
4
ALL VEHICLES 170 5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1 4.19 1.72
77
-------
TABLE 4B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF
VEH.
128
22
20
HC
MEAN S.D.
7.30
5.86
5.12
5.40
2.68
3.68
CO
MEAN S.D.
104.1
96.2
68.7
49.5
53.5
29.4
CO
MEAN
550.5
348.1
305.2
2
S.D.
97.0
45.4
64.1
NGXC
MEAN S.D.
3.00
2.26
2.07
1.37
1.29
1.13
8
6
4
ALL VEHICLES 170 6.86 5.00 98.9 49.2 495.4 131.1 2.80 1.37
78
-------
TABLE 4B -
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
8
6
4
ALL VEHICLES
* OF
VEH.
129
21
20
170
HC
MEAN S.
5.79
4.60
4.37
5.48
5.
2.
4.
4.
D.
02
78
56
76
C
MEAN
70.
49.
42.
64.
6
7
3
7
0
S.D.
46.4
33.8
30.9
44.6
C02
MEAN S>
575.3
408*6
331.5
526.0
100
50
47
127
D.
.5
• 1
.8
• 5
NCXC
MEAN S.D.
4.54
4.03
3.20
4.32
1.84
1.69
1.04
1 . 79
79
-------
TABLE 4B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
9 *^K HC C^ CC2 N^XC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
8 131 5.35 4.76 61.0 32.5 552-4 100*5 4.63 1.68
6 19 5.00 5.02 55.0 42.0 378.7 43.6 3.94 1.82
4 20 4.02 2.48 50*2 36.6 316*5 53*4 2.45 1*16
ALL VEHICLES 170 5.15 4.58 59*0 34.2 505.3 126.7 4.30 1*79
80
-------
TABLE 5A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST. RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
e OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
COS
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
LESS THAN 251 41 6.37 3-43 91.5 45.4 336.4 61.0 2.16 1.19
251-330 41 10.83 9.04 121.6 70.3 489.7 80.9 2.44 1.16
331-399 53 6.86 2.52 118.6 48.7 573.2 63.8 2.86 1.16
MORE THAN 399 35 7.44 4.90 117.2 49-7 656.6 100.8 3.47 1.56
ALL VEHICLES 170 7-82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2 2.72 1.33
81
-------
TABLE 5A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
S OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S'D.
CC2
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S»D.
LESS THAN 251 40 5.03 3.74 54.7 35.1 375.8 62.3 3.62 1.28
251-330 44 7.62 7.12 76.8 40.1 513.6 67.1 3.99 1.55
331-399 51 6.22 4.84 91.7 62.4 597.9 99.9 4.12 1.91
MORE THAN 399 35 5.71 5.10 81.8 66.3 687.0 90.6 5.20 2.07
ALL VEHICLES 170 6.20 5.40 77.1 54.0 542.2 136.7 4.19 1.80
82
-------
TABLE.5A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF
VEH.
MEAN
HC
s.
D.
MEAN
CD-
S'
D.
C
MEAN
02
S*
D.
NOXC
MEAN S
.D.
LESS THAN 251 38 4.93 4.21 57-9 39.5 349.8 56.4 3.13 1.63
251-330 45 6.14 3.54 71.8 45.7 496.7 50.8 4.27 1.64
331-399 52 6.23 6.18 72.5 28.7 557.1 86.3 4.40 1-67
MORE THAN 399 35 4.85 4.89 62.5 38.4 661.8 113.8 4.95 1.52
ALL VEHICLES 170 5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1 4.19 1.72
83
-------
TABLE 5B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF
VEH.
LESS THAN 251
251-330
331-399
MORE THAN 399
41
41
53
35
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.
9.
6.
6.
58
69
02
29
3.18
8.37
2.15
3.09
CO
MEAN S.D.
83.7
106.8
103.9
99.7
45.7
62.8
43.6
40.5
CO
MEAN
325
470
552
636
.5
.8
.5
.9
2
S.D.
57.5
71 .5
59.6
94.2
NCXC
MEAN S.D.
2.17
2.51
2.93
3.65
1.22
1.19
1.17
1.58
ALL VEHICLES 170 6.86 5.00 98.9 49-2 495.4 131-1 2.80 1.37
-------
TABLE SB
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT CCUB1C INCHES)
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S*D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D*
LESS THAN 251
251-330
331-399
MORE THAN 399
ALL VEHICLES 170 5.48 4.76 64.7 44.6 586.0 187.5 4*38 1*79
40
44
51
35
4.57
6.98
5.24
5.04
3.71
6.52
3.58
4.48
47*0
66.1
75.7
67.2
38.1
36*5
49.3
53.7
370.4
500*1
577.5
661*6
68.8
62.7
89.0
86.0
3.68
4.14
4.28
5.33
1.44
1.54
1.86
1.98
85
-------
TABLE 5B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
* OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
LESS THAN 251 38 4.58 3.96 58*6 39.4 344.4 56.4 3*13 1*68
251-330 45 5.58 3.06 62.4 38.0 487.7 49.3 4.40 1.64
331-399 52 5.71 5.93 63.1 24.4 545.3 82.8 4.54 1.75
MORE THAN 399 35 4.45 4.56 55.6 35.3 643.0 107*5 5.08 1.58
ALL VEHICLES 170 5.15 4.58 59.0 34.2 505.3 126.7 4.30 1.79
86
-------
TABLE 6A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT CLBS)
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1501-2000
2001-2500
2501-3000
3001-3500
3501-4000
4001-4500
4501-5000
5001-5500
* OF
VEH.
8
12
24
44
40
35
6
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
7.49
4.48
7-86
7.71
9.49
7.65
5.71
6.32
5.34
1.14
7.12
5.57
6.39
4.85
1.77
o.oo
C
MEAN
89.6
65.8
94.1
107.0
140.3
117.6
136.8
95.8
0
S.D.
30.6
25.2
47.9
47.5
67.9
49.7
42.7
o.o
CC2
MEAN S.D.
288.5
332.8
396.6
512.4
540.5
638.1
712.6
636.6
89.3
45*1
74.1
102.5
78.9
86.5
123.2
0.0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1.78
2.35
2.27
2.57
2.69
3.50
2.84
.05
.20
.10
.12
.30
.48
.60
4.89 0*00
ALL VEHICLES 170
7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2
2.72 1.33
87
-------
TABLE 6A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT (LBS)
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1501-SOOO
2001-2500
2501-3000
3001-3500
3501-4000
4001-4500
4501-5000
5001-5500
9 OF
VEH.
12
11
23
35
50
27
12
0
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.53
3.64
5.69
5.84
7.95
6.13
3.86
5.53
3.06
3*28
2.73
7.69
5.50
1.68
C
MEAN
51.7
44.8
61.4
84.2
89.6
91.0
58.2
0
S.D.
38.4
39.5
31.5
51.9
56.7
72.1
31*2
CO
MEAN
323.7
371.2
448.3
543.2
562.0
657.8
751 .6
2
S.D.
39.9
53.7
92.8
95.8
90.4
77.9
66.5
NGXC
MEAN S.D.
3.30
2.86
3.73
4.01
4.27
4.70
6.24
0.98
1.18
1.38
1 .56
1.83
1.98
1.88
ALL VEHICLES 170
6.20 5.40 77.1 54.0 542.2 136*7 4.19 1.80
88
-------
VS.
TABLE 6A
; EMISSION 'TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT (LBS)
' 'CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1501-2000
2001-2500
2501-3000
3001-3500
3501-4000
4001-4500
4501-5000
5001-5500
9 OF
VEH.
11
11
18
28
56
36
7
3
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.36
3.66
5.58
4.62
6.66
6.31
2.91
2.46
3.02
2.33
5.35
1.90
4.92
7.05
1.34
0.42
.C
MEAN
67.5
45.1
62.8
59.4
77.3
74.6
32.9
36.4
0
S.D.
42.4
29.2
45.0
26.3
42.0
35.1
17.1
10.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
299*8
346.0
405.7
506.4
522.9
617.9
766.6
766.8
55.0
34.8
57.1
55.9
79.3
86.2
128.0
45.0
NCXC
MEAN S.D.
2.11 0*90
2.79
3.85
4.07
4.26
5.03
5.67
.17
.55
.50
.51
.79
.89
5.62 0*68
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1
4.19 1.72
89
-------
TABLE 6B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT CLBS)
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1501
2001
2501
3001
3501
4001
4501
5001
-2000
-2500
-3000
-3500
-4000
-4500
-5000
-5500
* OF
VEH.
8
12
24
44
40
35
6
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
6.95
3.90
6.92
6.84
8.29
6.55
4.87
5.85
5.36
1.00
6.26
5.32
5.85
3.11
1.27
0.00
C
MEAN
83.7
58.7
85.3
95.2
121.1
102.7
111.2
94.4
C
S.D.
33.1
22*9
46.5
47.3
59.2
42.6
27.5
o.o
MEAN
280.5
321.7
382.6
492.5
521.1
618.7
692.3
608.1
S.D.
83.8
43.5
70.9
96.6
68.9
82.1
113.3
0*0
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
.72
.30
• 33
.61
.79
.67
• 08
.04
.17
.15
• 20
• 27
.52
.59
.65 0*00
ALL VEHICLES 170
6.86 5.00 98*9 49.2 495.4 131.1
2.80 1.37
90
-------
TABLE 6B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT (LBS)
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1501
2001
2501
3001
3501
4001
4501
5001
-2000
-2500
-3000
-3500
-4000
-4500
-5000
-5500
« OF
VEH.
12
11
23
35
50
27
12
0
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.44
3.40
5.02
5.28
6.77
5.54
3.30
5.70
2.66
3.08
2.42
6.62
4.90
1.34
C
MEAN
47.6
37.0
52.7
72.9
73.6
73.9
48.2
0
S.D.
38.3
29.9
30.6
49.6
42.5
56.2
28.1
CO
MEAN
318.6
366.8
440*1
525.1
544.4
635.3
724.7
2
S.D.
39*
60*
87.
86.
79.
67.
75.
3
1
5
5
8
7
4
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
3.19,
2.88
3.89
4.12
4.46
4.88
6.32-
0.99
1.15
1.57
1.57
1.72
1.85
2.05
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.48 4.76
64.7 44.6 526.0 127.5 4.32 1.79
91
-------
TABLE 6B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT (LBS)
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1501-2000
2001-2500
2501-3000
3001-3500
3501-4000
4001-4500
4501-5000
5001-5500
* OF
VEH.
11
11
18
28
56
36
7
3
H
MEAN
4.88
3.33
5.12
4.23
6.03
5.85
2.71
2.42
C
S.D.
2.73
2.05
5.08
1.67
4.55
6.73
1.26
0.72
C
MEAN
62.7
40.6
55*4
52.2
67.3
65.6
28.8
36.1
C
S.D.
41.1
27.6
44.1
23.3
34.3
33.6
14.5
20.0
CC
MEAN
295.0
342.7
398.1
496*6
511.9
602.4
745.6
745.7
!2
S.D.
55.0
35.5
58*8
55*6
75.5
81.2
110.3
45.3
NO
MEAN
2.01
2.85
3.91
4.19
4.39
5.16
5.84
5.64
XC
S.D.
0.87
1.20
1.64
1.51
1.51
1 .88
2.07
0.97
ALL VEHICLES 170
5.15 4.58 59.0 34.2 505.3 126.7
4.30 1.79
92
-------
TABLE 7A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF HC CO CCS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S-D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
AUTOMATIC 138 8.02 5-99 117.4 56.8 551.2 115.4 2.90 1.36
MANUAL 32 6-94 3.81 91.2 41.0 349.2 97.8 1.93 0.86
BOTH TYPES 170 7.82 5.65 112.5 55-0 513.1 137.2 2.72 L33
93
-------
TABLE 7A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
« OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
COS
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
AUTOMATIC 136 6.26 5.64 80.9 56.6 585.5 113.9 4.41 L84
MANUAL 34 5.96 4.37 61.9 39.4 368.9 68.9 3.33 L30
BOTH TYPES 170 6.SO 5.40 77.1 54.0 543.3 136.7 4.19 L80
9U
-------
TABLE 7A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AUTOMATIC
MANUAL
# OF
VEH.
148
22
, HC
MEAN S.D.
5.68
5.27
5.09
3.27
C
MEAN
68.3
57.9
0
S.D.
38.3
37.7
C02
MEAN S.D.
542.1
343.0
117.7
85.5
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
4.42
2.68
1 .67
1 .24
BOTH TYPES
170
5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1
4.19 1.72
95
-------
TABLE 7B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
« OF HC CO COS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S»D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S-D.
AUTOMATIC 138 7.00 5.25 102.3 50.3 532.0 110.6 3.00 1«39
MANUAL 32 6.21 3.70 84.3 41.6 337.5 88.9 1.90 0.86
BOTH TYPES 170 6.86 5.00 98.9 49.2 495.4 131.1 2.80 L37
96
-------
TABLE 7B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
ff Or HC CO COS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S»D« MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
AUTOMATIC 136 5.47 4.89 67.3 46-3 566.1 106.0 4-57 1.81
MANUAL 34 5.49 4»S6 54.4 35»9 365.7 64.7 3.32 1.31
BOTH TYPES 170 5.48 4.76 64.7 44.6 526.0 127*5 4.32 1.79
97
-------
TABLE 7B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
CHICAGO
; . -S9.75 FEDERAL-TEST •• PRCCSOH1KE
* OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN SoD. MEAN S«D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
AUTOMATIC 148 5.21 4.78 60*1 33.8 529.9 112.4 4.54 1.72
MANUAL 22 4.79 2.98 51.8 36o3, 339.4 87.5 2.69 1.36
BOTH TYPES 170 5-15 4« 58 59.0 34»2 505.3 126.7 4.30 1.79
98
-------
TABLE 8A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
DENVER
1978 FEDERAL. TEST PROCEDURE
* OF HC CO CSS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S»D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S.D.
FOUR BARREL 41 7.63 5.57 118.8 48.2 604.3 119.4 2.81 1.36
TWO BARREL 93 8.39 6.27 116.7 59.6 540.3 102.1 2.87 1.32
ONE BARREL 32 6.84 3.70 98.6 46.6 336.5 68.4 2.07 1.14
FUEL INJECTION 4 4.42 1.43 61.9 38.1 360.1 32.5 3.35 1.65
ALL TYPES 170 7.82 5.65 112.5 55.0 513.1 137.2 2.72 1.33
99
-------
TABLE 8A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# OF HC CO COS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S.D.
FOUR BARREL 38 6.48 4.94 89.2 59-1 633.5 119.0 4.31 2.18
TWO BARREL 97 6.43 5.99 30.0 55.3 566.6 109-0 4.39 1.72
ONE BARREL 34 5.28 4.03 56.9 37.7 375.7 65.9 3.48 L36
FUEL INJECTION 1 3.58 0.00 22.6 0.0 361.1 0.0 4.96 0»00
ALL TYPES 170 6.20 5.40 77.1 54.0 542.2 136.7 4.19 1.80
100
-------
TABLE 8A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER CF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
« OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
C02
MEAN S.D.
NCXC
MEAN S.D.
FOUR BARREL 30 5.43 3.45 77.0 46.5 623.5 143.7 4.49 1.72
TWO BARREL 107 5.83 5.38 66.4 34.6 537.S 94.1 4.41 1.64
ONE BARREL 32 5.26 4.41 61.1 40.8 350.5 62.6 3.25 1.74
FUEL INJECTION 1 2.39 0.00 17.5 0.0 378.2 0.0 2.76 0.00
ALL TYPES 170 5.63 4.89 67.0 38.3 516.3 132.1 4.19 1.72
101
-------
TABLE 8B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
f OF
VEH.
HC
MEAN S.D.
CO
MEAN S.D.
CC2
MEAN S.D.
NOXC
MEAN S.D.
FOUR BARREL 41 6.73 4.83 104.2 40.8 582.1 114.4 2.94 1.46
TWO BARREL 93 7.33 5.55 101.0 53.0 522.1 96.9 2.96 1.32
ONE BARREL 32 6-03 3.44 91-2 47-6 325.4 64.5 2.08 1.20
FUEL INJECTION 4 3.72 1.15 56.7 34.4 347.9 29.8 3.26 1.61
ALL TYPES 170 6.86 5-00 98.9 49.2 495.4 131.1 2.80 1.37
102
-------
TABLE 8B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
« OF
VEH.
FOUR BARREL
TWO BARREL
ONE BARREL
FUEL INJECTION
38
97
34
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.
5.
4.
2.
79
59
86
88
4.73
5.05
3.96
0.00
CO
MEAN S.D.
75.4
66.5
49.1
17.5
50.2
44.3
34.4
0.0
C02
MEAN S.D.
612.
548.
370.
358.
8
2
7
5
111 .4
100.0
66.7
o.o
NO
MEAN
4.42
4.54
3.57
4.66
XC
S.D.
2.08
1.71
1.53
o.oo
ALL TYPES
170
5.48 4.76 64.7 44.6 526.0 127.5 4.32 1.79
103
-------
TABLE 8B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
0 OF
VEH.
FOUR BARREL
TWO BARREL
CNE BARREL
FUEL INJECTION
30
107
32
1
HC
MEAN S.D.
5.
5.
4.
1.
02
32
82
96
3*18
5.05
4.J6
0«00
C
MEAN
67.6
58 = 2
55.2
14.6
0
S.D.
40.0
29.8
40.9
o.o
C02
MEAN S.
606.7
526*2
344.3
377.2
135
89
62
0
D.
.6
.9
.3
.0
NO
MEAN
4.65
4.53
3.27
2.49
XC
S.D.
1.73
1.70
1.80
o.oo
ALL TYPES
170
5*15 4.58 59.0 34.2 505.3 126.7 4.30 1.79
-------
TABLE 9A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED "T" TEST
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
« OF HC CO COS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D.
FIRST TEST 10 8.52 5.14 133.8 63.7 530.1 136.6 2.55 1.41
SECOND TEST 10 8.72 5.56 135.0 65.7 526.2 124.3 2.51 L49
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED "T") 10 0.20 0.70 1.2 10.8 -3.9 27.9 -0.04 0.30
105
-------
TABLE 9A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED "T" TEST
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
S OF HC CO COS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S-D«
FIRST TEST 10 4.60 1.91 70-1 48.7 622.5 103.9 4.21 1.68
SECOND TEST 10 4.70 1=64 67-0 45.4 615»0 103.6 4.32 1.22
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED "T") 10 0.09 0.51 -3.1 13.4 -7.5 29.3 0-11 0.83
106
-------
TABLE 9A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED "T" TEST
CHICAGO
1978 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
i? OF HC CO COS NCXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D. MEAN S»D. MEAN S.D.
FIRST TEST 10 4.37 1.99 b5.2 32.4 564.4 133.7 4.34 1.21
SECOND TEST 10 4.04 1.54 59.0 23.9 550.0 136.7 4.80 1.18
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED "T") 10 -0.33 0.54 -6.2 11.8 -14.4 17.1 -0.04 0.45
107
-------
TABLE 9B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED "T" TEST
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
9 OF HC CO COS NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S*D* MEAN S*D* MEAN S.D.
FIRST TEST 10 7*49 4.46 122*3 61*2 502*0 117*1 2*49 1*30
SECOND TEST 10 7*34 4.23 117*5 59*8 503*1 112*8 2*52 1*38
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED "T") 10 -0*16 0*46 -4*9 11.7 1.1 20*7 0*03 0*26
108
-------
TABLE 9B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED "T" TEST
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
f OF HC CO COS NOXC
UEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S«D. MEAN S»D. MEAN S.D-
FIRST TEST 10 4.18 1.60 61.4 44.2 598.1 92.1 4.17 1.52
SECOND TEST 10 4.20 1.54 58.1 42.6 591.6 90.2 4.33 1.18
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED "T") 10 0.02 0.36 -3.3 12.9 -6.4 25.1 0.16 0.70
109
-------
TABLE 9B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED "T" TEST
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
ff OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.D. MEAN S»D. MEAN S«D- MEAN S«D.
FIRST TEST 10
SECOND TEST 10
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED "T") 10
3.90 1.72
3.63 1.36
55.2 29.9
50.4 23.1
553.7 128.0
539.5 130.1
5.06 1.33
4*96 1.22
-0.27 0.41 -4.8 9.3 -14.2 13.5 -0 • 11 0.37
110
-------
TABLE 10A
VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
<3
NO.
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
HC
.4 GM/MI
20.0
8.3
0.0
5.1
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
100.0
8.3
o.o
0.0
10.0
c;
<39
NO.
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
^
GM/MI
X
o.o
0*0
o.o
2.6
0.0
50.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.0
9.1
0.0
o.o
o.o
0-0
20.0
BOTH HC
<3*4 AND
NO.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
AND CO
<39 GM/MI
o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
10.0
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES
0
0
0
1
0
1
5
o.o
0.0
o.o
4.5
0.0
3.3
14.3
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
o.o
0.0
o.o
0.0
o.o
6.7
8.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.1
2.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.6
1 IV
-------
TABLE 10A
VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMGBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
<3
NO.
1
4
1
7
0
2
0
7
0
1
1
0
3
3
2
2
HC
.4 GM/MI
Z
20.0
33.3
25.0
• 17.9
0.0
100.0
o.o
20.0
0.0
14.3
9.1
0.0
25.0
21.4
66.7
20.0
C
<39
NO.
1
3
1
6
0
2
3
9
0
2
1
0
2
4
3
1
0
GM/MI
%
20.0
25.0
25.0
15.4
0.0
100.0
30.0
25.7
0.0
28.6
9.1
0.0
16.7
28.6
100.0
10.0
BOTH HC
<3.4 AND
NO.
1
3
1
3
0
2
0
3
0
1
1
0
2
3
2
0
AND CO
<39 GM/MI
X
20.0
25.0
25.0
7.7
0.0
100.0
0.0
8.6
0.0
14.3
9.1
o.o
16.7
21 .4
66.7
o.o
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES
0
0
0
2
5
10
17
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
18.5
33.3
48.6
0
0
3
2
7
8
13
0.0
o.o
14.3
9.1
25.9
26.7
51.4
34
20.0
0
0
0
1
3
6
12
o.o
o.o
0.0
4.5
11.1
20.0
34.3
38
22 o 4
22
12.9
112
-------
TABLE 10A
VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC •
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
POMTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO.
1
4
3
10
0
2
2
13
1
2
3
1
5
2
2
4
0
0
3
5
5
15
27
HC
.4 GM/MI
20.0
33.3
75.0
25.6
o.o
100.0
20.0
37.1
100.0
28.6
27.3
100.0
41.7
, 14.3
66.7
40.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
22.7
18.5
50.0
77.1
CO
<39
NO.
0
2
2
5
1
2
2
8
0
2
3
0
2
, 0 .
2
2
0
2
2
3
4
4
18
GM/MI
0.0
16.7
50.0
12.8
25.0
100.0
20.0
22.9
0.0
28.6
27.3
0.0
16.7
0.0
66.7
20.0
0.0
11.1
9.5
13.6
14.8
13.3
51.4
BOTH HC
<3.4 AND
NO.
0
2
2
4
0
2
1
6
0
2
2
0
2
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
1
4
18
AND CO
<39 GM/MI
0.0
16.7
50.0
10.3
0.0
100.0
10.0
17.1
0.0
28*6
18.2
0.0
16.7
0.0
66.7
20.0
0.0
0.0
9.5
9.1
3.7
13.3
51.4
55
32.4
33
19.4
27
15.9
1 13
-------
TABLE 11
EVAPORATIVE EMISSION TEST RESULTS
DENVER
SHED PROCEDURE
NUMBER OF VEHICLES
20
DIURNAL SOAK I TIME
ENCLOSURE TEMPERATURE
INTERNAL TEMPERATURE
HC
HOT SOAKS TIME
ENCLOSURE TEMPERATURE
INTERNAL TEMPERATURE
HC
COMBINED LOSSES
60-0 MINUTES
73.4 DEGREES.F.
83.9 DEGREES.F.
17.4 GRAMS
60.0 MINUTES
82.9 DEGREES*F.
91.9 DEGREES.F.
14.2 GRAMS
31.7 GRAMS
FUEL INSPECTION RESULTS:
REID VAPOR PRESSURE
HYDROGEN/CARBON RATH
8.78
2.26
FUEL DISTILLATION TEMPERATURES* DEGREES.F.
INITIAL BOILING POINT 85.8
5% EVAPORATED 121.9
10* EVAPORATED 135.7
15% EVAPORATED 14B.7
20% EVAPORATED 161.6
30% EVAPORATED 184.4
40* EVAPORATED 201.9
50% EVAPORATED 215.8
902 EVAPORATED 320.9
FINAL BOILING POINT 333-7
AVERAGE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND REPLICATE TESTS
NUMBER OF PAIRS
DIURNAL!
HOT SOAKS
COMBINEDS
-0.4 GRAMS
3«8 GRAMS
3o5 GRAMS
1 1U
-------
Legend for Table 12
injection,
speed
taken
taken during
VEH0 - Number assigned to vehicle for test purposes
A suffix R Indicates a replicate test
TST# - Number assigned to test
DATE - this Is the date the test was conducted
first two numbers are year, second two are month,
last two are day
YR - Model year of vehicle
MAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CIO - Engine displacement in cubic inches
N - Number of carburetor venturtes, 0 - Fuel
1-1 barrel, 2-2 barrel, i* - U barrel
T - transmission, 1 - Automatic, 3-3 speed,
IWT - Inertia weight applied for test
HP - Horsepower, at 50 MPH, applied for test
WB - Wet bulb temperature, degrees Fahrenheit, taken
during test
DB - Dry bulb temperature, degrees Fahrenheit,
during test
BAROM -. Barometer pressure, inches of. Mercury,
test
C - Number of cylinders
A - Designates whether or not air conditioning Is
present in vehicle
Y - yes, N - no
V - Indicates If evaporative
Y - yes, N - no
X - Indicates if exhaust emission
Y - yes, N - no
P - Indicates If PCV Is present
Y - yes, N - no
ODOM. - Odometer reading
TC - Fuel tank capacity In gallons
.IRPM - Idle RPM
S - State of transmission at time idle RPM was read
N - neutral, 0 - drive
DUEL - Dwell in degrees
TIME - Timing in degrees, + Indicates before TDC, - indicates
after TDC
L - Indicates whether an air conditioning load was
simulated during test
Y .- yes, N - no
E - Indicates whether an evaporative test was performed
6n the .vehicle
Y - yes, N - no
emission control Is present
control Is present
115
-------
TABLE 12
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEHO TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0001
0002
0003
0001*
0005
0006
0007
0010
0012
0013
OOU
0015
0016
0017
0018
0020
0021
0022
002U
0026
0027
0023
0029
0030
2001
2002
2003
200is
2005
2 OOS
200?
2010
2GI2
2013
2Qlk
2015
2016
2017
2018
2028
2021
202:1
2G2*»
202P
2027
2028
2029
2030
721128
721128
721127
721128
721127
721128
721129
721128
721129
721129
721129
721129
721130
721130
721130
721129
721130
721130
721130
721201
721201
721201
721201
721201
69
70
70
69
72
69
70
68
70
70:
66
69
70
69
68
72
70
69
71
68
71
70
71
72
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
FORD
PLYM
PONT
FORD
BUIC
PORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
CHEV
FORD
DEVI
NOVA
IMPA
GALA
CUTL
CUTL
MUST
CAME
WAVE
FAST
GALA
FURY
CATA
FAIR
ELEC
WAVE
GALA
BE LA
STAW
TEMP
SEDA
ELEC
NOVA
LTD
l»72 k
307 2
350 2
390 2
350 2
350 l»
351 2
230 1
200 1
097 0
352 2
318 2
350 2
302 2
1(30 l*
200 1
351 2
350 I*
UOO 2
350 2
097 1
1*55 l»
307 2
1*29 l*
1 5000
1 3500
1 1*000
1 UOOO
1 3500
1 3500
1 3500
1 3500
1 2750
1 2500
1 UOOO
1 *. 0
31*. 0
30.0
32.0
33.0
37.0
53.0
39.0
28.0
58.0
28.0
30.0
31.0
+ OU. 0
+ 09.0
+08.0
+ 08.0
+ 05.0
+ 06.0
+ 00.0
+ 01*. 0
-06.0
+ 00.0
+06.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 09.0
+ 05.0
+ 07.0
+ 05.0
+02.0
+00.0
+ 00.0
+ 10.0
-05.0
+ 06.0
+ 08.0
+08.0
Y N
N N
Y N
Y W
Y Y
Y N
N N
W N
N hi
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
N Y
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y Y
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P :ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0031
0033
003U
0035
0038
0039
OOU1
001(2
OOU3
00l*l*
OOU5
OOU6
00t»8
001*9
0051
0052
0052R
0051*
0056
0057
0062
0063
0065
0066
2031
2033
2031*
2035
2038
2039
201*1
201*2
201*3
20l*it
20U5
20U6
201*8
20U9
•2051
2053
2058
2055
2057
2059
2061*
2065
2067
2068
721201
721201
721201
721201
721202
721202
721202
721202
721202
721202
721203
721203
721201*
721201*
72120U
721205
721205
721206
721205
721206
721208
721209
721211
721211
66
66
70
67
70
71
70
71
71
66
66
70
67
71
71
70
70
68
71
68
69
71
69
69
BUIC
CHEV
TOYO
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
VOLK
FORD
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
DATS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
TOYO
FORD
BUIC
DODG
PONT
FORD
WILD
BELA
CORL
FAIR
IMPA
CHEL
FURY
SQUA
TORI
MUST
IMPA
FAST
COUN
IMPA
510
DELT
DELT
FURY
CORL
CUST
LESA
DART
TEMP
FAIR
1*25
283
071
289
350
350
318
097
351
289
283
097
390
1*00
097
350
350
318
071
390
350
225
350
351
I* 1
2 1
1 i*
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
0 I*
2 1
I* 3
i* 1
0 i*
2 1
2 1
2 i*
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 I*
2 1
i* 1
1 1
2 1
l* 1
1*500
1*000
2000
3500
1*000
3500
1*000
2500
3500
3000
1*000
2500
1*500
1*000
2250
1*500
U500
1*000
2000
1*000
1*500
3000
3500
3500
lU. 0
12.0
8.3
11.2
13.2
12.3
13.2
9.1*
12.3
10.3
13.2
9.1*
12.7
13.2
8.8
11*. 0
11*. 0
13.2
8.3
12.0
11*. 0
10.3
12.3
11.2
50 70
51 72
53 71
51* 73
53 71
50 72
52 71
51* 73
52 71
52 71
53 68
1*7 69
52 71
51 71
51 70
53 69
52 70
51 69
52 72
51 70
52 69
51 69
52 72
51 7U
21*. 61
21*. 61
21*. 60
21*. 61
2U. 53
2U. U9
2i*. 59
2U. 60
2U. 60
21*. 59
21*. 51*
21*. 56
21*. 35
21*. 35
2i». 35
21*. 35
21*. 67
21*. 67
2U. 67
21*. 1*2
21*. 1*6
2U. 1*6
21*. 50
2U. 52
8 Y
8 N
l* N
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
8 Y
l* N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
l* N
8 N
8 Y
l* N
8 Y
8 Y
8 N
i* Y
8 N
8 Y
6 N
8 N
8 N
N N Y
N N Y
N Y Y
N N Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N N Y
N N Y
N Y Y
N N Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
080626
033395
01*5591
0731*21*
020673
029891
035950
0181*81*
019877
053U65
OU0287
01*0236
06(«8l(0
018171*
013050
071288
071288
07709U
036U9I*
01*9517
0357UO
012619
023867
06371*5
25
20
12
20
25
25
2U
11
22
16
20
11
25
25
11
25
25
21*
12
22
25
18
22
20
500 D
580 D
710 N
510 D
1*60 D
510 D
560 D
960 N
UUO D
500 N
520 D
6UO D
550 D
600 D
700 D
600 D
600 D
700 D
850 N
6UO D
610 D
600 D
6UO D
1*80 D
30.0
31*. b
37.0
31.0
30.0
30.0
31.0
56.0
31.0
35.0
26.0
U6.0
29.0
29.0
38.0
29.0
29.0
31*. 0
51*. 0
29.0
31.0
1*8.0
29.0
31*. 0
+ OU. 0
+ 06.0
+ 06.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 06.0
+ 06.0
+ 02.0
-06.0
+ 08.0
+06.0
+ 05.0
-03.0
+06.0
+ 10.0
+ 02.5
+ 08.0
+ 08.0
+ 02.5
-02.0
+ 11.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 07.0
+ 08.0
+ 08.0
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST£ DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0068
0069
0070
0071
0072
0075
0075
0076
0077
OQ77R
0078
0078R
0079
0080
0081
0082
0083
0081*
0086
0087
0089
0091
0092
0091*
2070
2071
2072
2073
2Q7k
2:075
2077
2073
asm
2 08 in
2080
2085
2081
2082
2083
2085
208?
2Q83
2090
2091
20S3
2095
2096
2099
721212
721212
721212
721212
721212
721211*
721213
721213
721211*
721211*
72121U
721211*
72121U
7212H*
721215
721215
721215
721216
721216
721216
721218
721218
721217
721219
69
71
66
72
66
69
68
68
68
68
67
67
66
67
72
66
68
72
70
71
69
70
71
72
PONT
PLYM
VOLK
CADI
CADI
VOLK
FORD
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
VOLK
CHRY
PONT
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
MERC
FORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CATA
SATE
SEDA
DEVI
DEVI
SEDA
MUST
DEVI
IMPA
IMPA
BELV
BELV
TEMP
SEDA
NEWP
BONN
CATA
SEDA
SKYL
COUG
GALA
FAIR
CHEL
IMPA
1*00
318
078
1*72
U29
091
289
U72
327
327
318
318
326
091
1*00
389
UOG
097
350
351
302
302
350
1*00
2 1
2 1
1 I*
t» 1
i* 1
1 I*
2 1
I* 1
1* 1
i* 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1*
2 1
i* 1
2 1
1 It
i* 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1*500
3500
2000
5000
5000
2000
3000
5000
1*000
1*000
3500
3500
3500
2000
1*500
1*500
1*500
2000
3500
3500
1*000
3500
3500
1*500
1U. 0
11.2
8.3
11*. 7
11*. 7
8.3
10,3
11*, 7
13,2
13.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
8.3
ll*«,0
l!*aO
11*. 0
8.3
12.3
12.3
13.2
12.3
12.3
It*. 0
51
52
52
51
52
55
51
51
51
50
51
50
51
51
50
51
51
52
50
50
1*9
51
52
50
69
73
72
71
72
70
71
70
69
70
70
69
69
70
69
70
70
71
69
71
70
71
70
69
2U. 56
21*. 53
2i*. 56
2U.57
21*. 57
21*. 69
21*. 69
21*. 69
21*. 82
21*. 99
21*. 80
21*. 99
21*. 87
21*. 87
21*. 99
21*. 99
21*. 99
21*. 87
21*. 87
21*. 83
2U. 75
21*. 75
2U. 76
2U. 53
8
8
i*
8
8
k
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
l*
8
8
8
l*
8
8
8
8
8
8
Y N
N Y
N N
Y Y
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y Y
Y N
N N
N Y
Y N
Y Y
Y N
Y N
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
05766U
0230U5
060705
008382
0591*23
029612
051*959
OU0055
01*0082
01(0082
033673
033673
01*0116
065262
OUU557
05861*8
OU7316
001*917
022367
007328
OU9611
0201*90
012265
018171*
26
19
10
26
26
10
22
26
25
25
22
22
22
10
21*
26
26
10
20
22
22
20
25
25
600
600
1050
600
600
950
600
610
600
590
600
600
600
960
1*90
600
670
1000
51*0
680
560
5UO
600
720
D
D
K!
D
D
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
0
K'
D
D
D
D
D
D
29.0
30.0
36.0
31.0
26.0
37.0
30.0
31.0
30.0
30.0
27.0
27.0
30.0
39.0
29.0
29.0
25.0
56.0
30.0
30.0
27.0
27.0
29.0
29.0
+ 13.0
+ 02.5
+ 02.0
+ 07.0
+ 10.0
+ 00.0
+ 06.0
+ 05.0
+ 02.0
+ 02.0
+ 07.0
+ 07.0
+ 06.0
+ 07.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 13.0
+ 00.0
+ 00.0
+ 12.0
+ 10.0
+09.0
+ 07.0
+ 01*. 0
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST0 DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T • IW.T HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0095
0096
0098
0100
0102
0103
0105
0107
0108
0109
0110
0111
0112
0113
011U
0116
0117
0118
0119
0120
0121
0123
0121*
0125
2100
2101
2103
2105
2107
2108
2110
2113
211U
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2122
2123
2121*
2125
2126
2127
2129
2130
2131
721219
721219
721219
721221
721221
721,221
721221
721226
721226
721226
721227
721227
721227
721227
721228
721228
721228
721229
721229
721229
721229
721229
730101*
730101*
69
71
72
72
72
70
70
71
70
71
72
6?
72
70
72
71
67
71
67
72
71
72
66
68
CHEV
OLDS
MERC
BUIC
FORD
FORD
DODG
BUIC
DODG
OPEL
OLDS
BUIC
RAMB
PLYM
PLYM
FORD
CHRY
FORD
FORD
FORD
CHEV
FORD
RAMB
CHRY
CHEL
CUTL
MONR
RIVI
TORI
MAVE
DART
SKYL
POLA
1900
DELT
RIVE
GREM
BARA
DUST
STAW
NEWP
TOR 1
MUST
PINT
MONT
STAW
CLAS
NEWY
350
350
351
1*55
351
250
318
350
383
116
1*55
1*30
258
225
318
1*29
383
302
289
122
350
UOO
232
1*1*6
2
2
2
l*
2
1
2
i*
2
2
i*
l*
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
l*
2
1
I*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l*
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
I*
1
1
1
1
1*000
1*000
1*500
1*500
1*000
2750
3500-
3500
1*500
2250
1*500
1*500
2750
3000
3500
1*500
1*000.
3500
3000
2250
1*000
1*500
3500
1*500
13.2
13.2
11*. 0
11* .:0
13.2
9.9
•11.2
12.3
11*. 0
8.8
1U. 0
11*. 0
9^.9
10.3
12.3
li*. 0
13.2
12.3
10.3
8.8
13.2
li*. 0
11.2
11*. 0
51
51
57
1*9
57
51
51
51
50
51
58
53
57
52
56
52
51
57
55
55
1*9
50
50
51
71
70
69
70
70
70
71
71
70
71
68
71*
70
72
71
72
70
68
69
69
69
70
68
71
21*.
21*.
21*.
21*.
2k.
21*.
2U.
21*.
2U.
2U.
21*.
2U.
21*.
21*.
2U.
21*.
2U.
2U.
21*.
2 1*'.
2 1*..
2U.
21*.
21*.
53
53
71
63
61
55
55
80
80
80
60
1*9
50
50
11
13
13
20
21*
32
38
39
1*0
1*8
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
l* N
8 Y
:8 N
6 N
6 N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 N
8'N
l* "N
8 Y
/8 Y
6 Y
8 Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y.
Y Y
NY.
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N.N
Y Y
Y. Y
Y Y
N N
N Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y.
063001*
028003
022683
009506
012751*
0281U9
011676
019078
Ol*U658
00721*5
022319
022609
016U38
029691
009333
000238
095821*
011751*
051*89.9
015072
026172
017181
01*8032
01*1501
25
20
25
25
23
16
18
20
2U
11
23
21
21
18
16
.23
2U
18
16
.11
19
21
16
.21*
1*80
680
580
720
520
510
580
500
600
920
625
1*8.0
610
680
580
510
810
1*90
550
1*1*0
620
605
1*50
610
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D.
D
N
D
.D
D
.D
D
N
D
D
D
D
29.0
29.0
28..0
29.0
30.0
38.0
51.0
29.0
29.0
38.0
28.0
35.0
1*0.0
31*. 0
30.0,
31.0
26.0
33.0
30.0
35.0
30.0
28.0
29.0
29.0
+ 00.0
+ 11.0
.;+06.0
+ 0670
+ 05.0
.+03.0
+ 05.0
+ 07.0
+ 15.0
+ 06.0
>13iO
-O.U..O.
+ 00.0
+ 15.0
-03.0
+ 02.0
+ 12". 0
+ 03.0
+ 00.0
+00.0
+08.0
+.06.0
+06.0
+05.0
Y N
Y N
Y Y
Y N
Y Y
N N
N .N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y Y
Y. N
N N.
N, N
Y Y'
Y N.
Y 'N
Y N:
N N
N Y
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0126
0127
0128
0129
0130
0131
0132
0133
013<*
0135
0136
0136R
0137
0138
0139
01UO
011*1
OU2
OU3
om
01U5
01U6
01U7
01U8
2132
2133
2131*
2135
2136
2137
2139
21^1*
21M
211*2
2U3
21U6
21U5
211*7
21U8
21*49
2150
2151
2152
2153
2151*
2155
2156
2157
73010U
73010U
730101*
730101*
730101*
730101*
730105
730105
730105
730105
730106
730106
730105
730108
730107
730107
730107
730107
730107
730109
730109
730109
730108
730110
68
71
72
67
70
67
72
68
69
71
72
72
69
68
72
66
72
67
68
72
72
72
67
66
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
PONT
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
FORD
FORD
OLDS
RAMB
PONT
CHEV
VOLK
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
BUIC
MERC
OLDS
SEDA
VEGA
MALI
BE LA
MARQ
CATA
MONT
STAW
CHEL
RIVI
MAVE
MAVE
TORO
JAVE
LEMA
CHEL
SQUA
CUTL
FALC
MONT
VEGA
LESA
MONR
JETS
091
1UO
307
283
1*29
1*00
350
1*28
230
1*55
302
302
U55
31*3
350
283
097
330
170
350
1UO
350
390
330
1
1
2
2
2
2
<*
k
1
I*
2
2
I*
U
2
1*
0
2
1
2
2
I*
2
2
I* 2000 8.3 50 71 2i».i*8 I* N N Y Y
l» 2500 9.1* 55 68 2U.52 I* N Y Y Y
1 3500 12.3 56 68 2U.5U 8 Y Y Y Y
1 1*000 12.0 1*8 70 21*. 55 8 N N N Y
1 U500 1U. 0 50 69 26.70 8 N N Y Y
1 1*000 12.0 1*7 71* 21*. 57 8 N N N Y
1 3500 12.3 56 70 2U.5I* 8 Y Y Y Y
1 U500 1U.O U7 69 21*. 67 8 Y N Y Y
1 3000 10.3 1*7 70 2U. 57 6 N N Y Y
1 l»500 11*. 0 kJ 69 21*. 1*7 8 Y Y Y Y
1 3000 10.3 1*6 72 2U.76 8 N Y Y Y
1 3000 10.3 50 70 2U.73 8 N Y Y Y
1 1*500 lit. 0 U7 70 21*. 67 8 Y N Y Y
1 3500 11.2 5U 68 2U.73 8 Y N Y Y
1 3500 12.3 1*7 69 2U.78 8 Y Y Y Y
1 3000 10.3 1*7 69 2U.78 8 N N N Y
1 2500 9.1* 1*7 69 2U.78 U Y Y Y Y
1 3500 12,3 1*7 70 2U.78 8 Y N N Y
3 3000 10.5 U7 69 2U.77 6 N N Y Y
1 3500 12.3 51* 68 21*. 83 8 Y Y Y Y
I* 2500 9.1* 5U 68 2U.71* U N Y Y Y
1 1*500 11*. 0 U8 69 21*. 72 8 Y Y Y Y
1 UOOO 13.2 1*7 70 2U. 50 8 Y N N Y
1 1*000 13.2 51* 68 21*. 61 8 N N N Y
0561*77
0139U8
0070i«i»
0521*52
017298
071337
019526
052573
063380
019000
019782
019782
OU3856
071326
007885
0503UI*
013650
0521U8
085629
0121*39
003117
017502
07361*0
01*0923
11
11
19
17
25
26
19
23
20
2U
15
15
2U
19
23
20
11
20
16
19
11
25
25
25
1000
1050
650
1*60
1*80
1*1*0
560
520
1*50
660
580
560
600
500
700
1)80
710
600
760
700
705
615
510
51*0
N
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
N
D
N
D
D
D
52.0
30.0
30.0
31.0
29.0
26.0
29.0
33.0
33.0
28.0
29.0
29.0
35.0
31.0
31.0
27.0
58.0
31*. 0
38.0
30.0
31*. 0
31.0
31*. 0
32.0
+ 00.0
+ 11*. 0
+08.0
4-08.0
+ OU.O
+ 10.0
+10.0
+07.0
-01.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 02.0
+01.0
+ 01*. 0
+00.0
+ 03.0
+ 08.0
+ 05.0
+ 10.0
+ 02.0
+08.0
+ 10.0
+ 02.0
+ 10.0
+05.0
N N
N N
Y Y
N N
Y N
N N
Y Y
Y N
N N
Y N
N Y
N Y
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
01U9
0150
0151
0152
0152R
0153
0151*
0155
0156
0157
0158
0159
0160
0160R
0161
0163
016'3R
0161*
0165
0166
0166R
0167
0168
0169
2158
2159
2160
2161
2173
2162
2163
2161*
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2178
2170
2172
2180
217U
2175
2176
2187
2177
2179
2181
730110
730110
730110
730110
730110
730110
730110
730110
730111
730111
730111
730111
730111
730111
730111
730111
730111
730112
730112
730112
730112
730112
730112
730112
71
70
68
72
72
68
72
68
69
67
70
72
71
71
70
70
70
68
72
71
71
71
69
72
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
FORD
DODG
OLDS
MERC
PONT
PONT
FORD
PLYM
PLYM
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
CHEV
DODG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
MAVE
CAPR
BELA
SUBU
SUBU
MUST
SPOR
CUTL
MONR
FIRE
STAW
TORI
DUST
DUST
DELT
NOVA
NOVA
COUG
MONT
CORO
CORO
PINT
MALI
IMPA
170
UOO
307
360
360
289
360
350
390
326
1*00
351
198
198
1*55
250
250
302
350
383
383
098
307
1*51*
1 3
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
U U
2 1
2 1
1 3
1 3
2 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
i* 1
i» 1
1 l*
2 1
I* 1
3000
1*000
UOOO
1*500
1*500
3000
1*000
3500
1*500
3500
1*500
UOOO
3000
3000
1*500
3000
3000
3500
1*000
1*000
UOOO
2250
3500
1*500
10.3
13.2
13.2
1U.O
11*. 0
10.3
12.0
12.3
11*. 0
11.2
11*. 0
13.2
10.3
10.3
11*. 0
10.3
10.3
11.2
13.2
13.2
13.2
8.8
11.2
11*. 0
50 78
57 70
1*6 69
1*7 68
1*7 69
1*7 69
1*8 70
1*7 69
1*8 68
50 68
55 69
58 71
1*8 69
50 69
1*8 69
1*7 68
1*8 69
58 72
58 71
60 68
51 69
50 68
50 69
1*9 69
2U. 66
2U. 61*
21*. 67
21*. 73
21*. 71
21*. 71*
21*. 77
21*. 76
21*. 78
2U. 79
2U. 79
2U. 76
2l».72
21*. 65
21*. 72
21*. 73
2U. 65
2U. 67
21*. 67
2U. 61*
2U. 80
21*. 63
21*. 65
21*. 65
6 N Y
8 Y N
8 N N
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 N N
8 Y N
8 N N
8 Y N
8 Y Y
6 N Y
6 N Y
8 Y N
6 N N
6 N N
8 N N
8 N Y
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
1* N Y
8 N N
8 Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
015656
038301
071*136
023793
023793
055851*
007021*
002968
051231*
091*601
019287
OOU723
021312
021312
023016
055711
055711
OU078I*
010158
016766
016766
0159U8
OU0689
031237
16
25
25
21
21
16
23
20
25
19
22
23
17
17
21*
18
18
17
19
21
21
11
20
23
61*0
620
51*0
7UO
720
610
610
510
6UO
1100
1*80
680
780
6UO
1*80
550
5UO
560
600
600
610
1100
610
1*60
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
N
N
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
N
D
D
30.0
3U. 0
33.0
30.0
30.0
31.0
31.0
31*. 0
22.0
3<«. 0
3U. 0
30.0
38.0
UO.O
31.0
31*. 0
3U. 0
32.0
30.0
27.0
27.0
U9.0
37.0
27.0
+ 00.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 02.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 05.0
+ 10.0
+ 08.0
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
-05.0
+ 06.0
+ 06.0
+ 08.0
+ 00.0
+ 00.0
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
+ 03.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 15.0
+ 10.0
+ 08.0
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0170
0171
0172
0173
017**
9175
0176
0176R
0177
0178
0179
0180
0181
0182
0183
0181*
0185
0186
0187
0188
0189
0190
0191
0192
2182
2183
2181*
2135
2186
2188
2189
2190
2 1S1
219'i
2195
219U
2195
2196
2197
219S
219S
2210
2201
2209
2203
220U
2205
2206
730113
730113
730113
730112
730113
?30113
?30113
T30113
730115
730115
730115
730115
730115
730115
730116
730116
750117
730517
730510
730511
730515
730515
730515
730515
68
71
68
66
69
70
69
69
71
72
70
67
68
67
67
66
67
72
67
72
71
67
66
66
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
DODG
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
DATS
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
RAMB
PLYM
3U1C
BUIC
CHEV
PONT
LINC
CHEV
DODG
MERC
POL A
TORI
IMPA
MUST
CORN
MUST
CHEL
CHEL
LEMA
510
NEWY
IMPA
IMPA
CAME
RAMB
FURY
SPEC
ELEC
IMPA
CATA
CONT
BELA
CORO
MONT
318
351
307
200
383
302
307
307
350
097
i*i«0
283
396
230
232
225
300
U55
283
1*00
1*60
283
383
390
2
2
2
I
k
2
2
2
2
2
u
2
k
1
1
1
2
k
2
2
k
2
li
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
1
U
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
U
1
UOOO
3500
UOOO
3500
3500
3000
3000
3000
3500
2250
U500
UOOO
UOOO
3500
3000
3500
3500
U500
UOOO
U500
5500
UOOO
3500
UOOO
13.2 52 77 2U.77 8 N N Y
12.3 U8 69 2U.78 8 N Y Y
13.2 53 75 2U.81 8 Y N Y
11.2 50 69 2U.77 6 N N Y
11.2 50 70 28.00 8 Y N Y
10.3 51 69 2U.80 8 N N Y
10.3 51 69 2U.81 8 N N Y
10.3 50 72 2U.83 8 N N Y
12.3 56 68 2U.83 8 N Y Y
8.8 50 68 2U.77 U N Y Y
1U.O 50 69 2U.67 8 Y N Y
13.2 50 70 2U.67 8 Y N N
13.2 50 69 2U.67 8 Y N Y
11.2 50 69 2U.67 6 N N N
10.3 50 70 2U.U1 6 N N N
11.2 51 70 2U.U1 6 N N N
12.3 51 70 2U.U1 8 N N N
12.7 60 76 2U.7U 8 Y Y Y
12.0 65 78 2U.62 8 Y N Y
12.7 60 79 2U.88 8 Y Y Y
13.9 61 73 2U.9U 8 Y Y Y
12.0 6U 78 2U.9U 8 Y N N
11.2 63 78 2U.88 8 N N N
12.0 62 79 2U.86 8 Y N N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
062061
01U802
067702
OU2320
OU9797
013577
05U733
05U733
017211
006101
016535
066552
022022
090503
062U83
075U16
OU3032
018938
07U66U
021U2U
012990
087953
077U6U
097137
2U
20
25
16
21
22
20
20
20
12
2U
25
25
18
16
25
20
2U
2U
25
22
2U
19
2U
520
500
660
600
6UO
560
U90
U90
630
780
780
580
570
570
560
660
550
7UO
U80
610
620
U60
590
U60
D
D
D
N
0
D
N
U
D
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
D
N
D
27.0
33.0
30.0
UO.O
55.0
31.0
20.0
20.0
30.0
55.0
37.0
31.0
30.0
31.0
36.0
U3.0
i*1.0
2S.O
30.0
50.0
30.0
28.0
UO.O
3U.O
+ 03.0
+ 08.0
+ 06.0
+ OU.O
+ 02.5
+ 05.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 16.0
+ 05.0
+ 02.5
+ 10.0
+ 06.0
+ 02.0
+ 06.0
+ 00.0
+ 15.0
+ 06.0
+ 07.0
+ 08.0
+06.0
+ 08.0
+ OU.O
-02.0
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
K N
K N
K N
K N
Y N
N Y
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
K Y
K N
N Y
Pa N
N N
N N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
DENVER
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0193
0191*
0195
0196
0197
0197R
0198
0199
0200
0201
0202
0203
2207
2208
2211
2212
2213
2216
221U
2215
2217
2218
2219
2220
730516
730516
730518
730522
730523
730523
730518
730523
730522
730601
730.601
750607
71
69
72
71
72
72
72
69
66
67
70
72
OLDS
PLYM
TOYO
PONT
PLYM
PLYM
DODG
FORD
CHEV
DODG
RAMB
CHEV
ROYA
VALI
CARI
STAW
FURY
FURY
DART
FALC
BISC
VAN
JAVE
MONT
l»55
225
097
U55
360
360
225
200
250
225
390
350
2 1
1 1
1 l»
li 1
2 1
2 1
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
i* k
2 1
1*500
30.00
2500
5000
1*000
1*000
3000
3000
3500
3000
3500
1*000
12.7
10.3
9.1*
13.1*
12.0
12.0
10.3
10.3
11.2
10.3
11.2
12.0
60
60
61
58
58
56
58
55
62
65
55
57
70
72
75
68
75
70
73
75
72
78
72
79
21*. 85
21*. 85
2l».73
2U. 65
21*. 60
2l».59
2)4.58
21*. 60
21*. 65
21*. U6
21*. U6
21*. 81*
8 Y Y
6 N N
I* N Y
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
6 N Y
6 N N
6 N N
6 N N
8 N N
8 Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
01*5551
01*3979
001*802
019957
023758
023758
011618
01*8106
099756
100000
01*2390
002523
25
18
13
2:5
2:5
23
16
16
20
20
19
19
610 D
510 D
720 N
620 D
780 D
770 D
800 N
600 N
8UO N
620 N
870 N
590 D
28.0
1*2.0
50.0
32.0
28.0
28.0
1*3.0
38.0
26.0
U2.0
32.0
29.0
+ 10.0
+ 00.0
+00.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 00.0
+ 06.0
+ 00.0
+02.0
+ 05.0
+ 12.0
N N
N N
N Y
N N
N Y
N Y
N Y
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
-------
TABLE 12
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH# TST# DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0301
0502
0303
0304
0305
0306
0307
0308
0309
0310
0311
0312
0313
031i»
0315
0315
0317
0318
0319
0320
0322
0323
032i»
0325
3001
3002
3003
300ii
3005
3006
300?
so oa
5005
3010
3011
3012
3013
301U
3015
3016
3017
3Dirt
3019
3020
3022
3023
3024
3025
730223
730223
730223
730223
730223
730223
730225
730223
730223
730223
73022U
730224
75022U
730224
730224
730221*
730224
730224
730221*
730221*
73022U
730221*
73022U
730226
66
72
70
70
71
66
71
72
71
71
68
72
66
72
66
70
72
69
72
66
71
68
66
69
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
OLDS
CHEV
VOLK
RAMB
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
EUIC
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CADI
PONT
CADI
GALA
IMPA
IMPA
CUTL
IMPA
PICK
LTD
OELT
tMPA
SEDA
AMBA
IMPA
IMPA
LTD
CATA
SEDA
RIVI
MALI
MONT
CHE2
IMPA
DEVI
TEMP
DEVI
390
350
350
1*55
350
283
1*29
350
400
097
290
1*00
283
1*00
389
097
1*55
307
350
194
350
1*72
326
1*72
2 1
2 1
2 1
it 1
2 1
2 3
1* 1
2 1
2 1
1 l*
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1*
I* 1
2 1
i* 1
1 3
2 1
i* 1
2 1
i* 1
1*000
1*000
1*000
3500
1*000
3500
1*500
U500
1*500
2250
3500
1*500
1*000
1*500
1*000
2000
1*500
3500
1*000
3000
1*000
5000
3500
5000
12.0
13.2
12.0
12.3
13.2
11.2
lU. 0
14*0
1U. 0
8.8
11.2
14.0
12.0
1U. 0
13.2
8.3
11*. 0
11.2
15.2
10.3
13.2
lit. 7
11.2
lit. 7
60
60
58
58
57
58
59
59
60
61
58
58
55
56
57
56
58
60
61
61
57
58
60
66
78
78
75
75
7U
68
75
72
72
73
78
71*
72
73
69
69
69
69
7U
75
68
68
68
85
50.15
50.11*
50.20
50.12
30.13
50.20
30.20
30.25
50.25
30.23
30.29
50.26
50.22
30.19
30.17
30.17
30.17
30.18
30.21
30.25
50.21*
50.2U
50.25
50.26
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
l» N Y
8 N N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P' ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0326
0327
0328
0329
0330
0330R
0331
0331R
0332
0333
0331*
0335
0336
0337
0338
0339
031*1
03U2
03U3
03UU
03U6
031*7
03t*8
0350
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3037
3031
301*3
3032
3033
303U
3035
3036
3038
3039
30UO
30U2
30UJ*
301*5
30U6
30U8
301*9
3050
3052
730226
730226
730226
730226
730226
.730226
730226
730226
730226
730226
730226
730226
730226
730226
730227
730227
730227
730227
730227
730227
730227
730228
730228
730228
72
71
71
69
69
69
71
71
66
72
70
67
71
70
69
71
72
69
70
71
71
69
67
72
TOYO
FORD
OLDS
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
BUIC
BUIC
RAMB
CADI
CHRY
VOLK
TOYO
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
FORD
PLYM
PONT
PONT
FORD
CORN
TORI
98
MUST
CUTL
CUTL
ELEC
ELEC
ROGU
DEVI
NEWY
SEDA
DELU
GALA
CAMA
LESA
STAW
DELT
CHEL
PINT
SATE
EXEC
VENT
TORI
120
351
1*55
200
350
350
1*55
U55
232
1*72
l»UO
091
071
351
307
350
1*55
1*55
307
097
318
350
1*00
351
2 1
2 1
I* 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
I* 1
i* 1
1 3
I* 1
I* 1
1 i*
1 3
2 1
2 3
l» 1
i* 1
2 1
2 1
1 l*
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2500
3500
5000
3000
3500
3500
1*500
1*500
3000
5000
1*500
2000
2000
1*000
3500
1*500
5000
1*000
3500
2250
1*000
1*500
1*000
1*000
9.1*
12.3
11*. 7
10.3
12.3
12.3
lU. 0
11*. 0
10.3
1U.7
11*. 0
8.3
8.3
12.0
11.2
11*. 0
11*. 7
13.2
11.2
8.8
13.2
11*. 0
13.2
13.2
61*
65
6U
61
60
58
62
59
61
60
60
5l»
68
60
60
60
60
60
60
59
59
58
61
56
80
80
78
72
71
72
71*
70
73
70
68
68
76
76
77
76
70
71
72
69
69
71*
80
78
30.25
30.31*
30.25
30.25
30.25
30.1*2
30.30
30.30
30.32
30.30
30.32
30.33
30.1*7
30.1*2
30.1*2
30.1*2
30.28
30.30
30.33
30.33
30.32
30.31*
30.37
30.32
l* Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 N
8 Y
8 Y
l* Y
l* N
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
i* N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N N
Y Y
N Y
N N
Y Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N N
Y Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
009310
01*1*887
029111*
OU2377
065313
065313
0121*96
0121*96
001*838
03108U
0311*02
069195
026699
037811
01*8162
031*523
026U90
031*560
095659
0271*81*
026620
01(9018
078021
01(1*571
12
20
25
20
20
20
21*
21*
16
27
21*
11
12
24
13
2«*
23
26
20
11
21
26
26
20
61*0
5UO
580
600
610
670
700
6UO
800
700
600
820
1000
660
760
620
620
620
700
560
590
600
1(60
610
D
D
D
D
D
D
.D
D
N
D
D
N
N
D
N
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
D
D
51*. 0
29.0
30.0
32.0
29.0
29.0
29.0
30.0
30.0
32.0
30.0
26.0
51*. 0
33.0
3U. 0
30.0
30.0
31.0
31.0
31.0
29.0
30.0
32.0
31.0
+ 05.0
-01*. 0
+ 08.0
+ 02.0
+ 06.0
+ 06.0
+ OU. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 08.0
+ 12.0
+ 06.0
+ 08.0
+ 05.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 00.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 08.0
+ 06.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 08.0
-12.0
-11.0
+01*. 0
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y,N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
-------
01
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '51'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH* TST0 DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0351
0353
055U
0355
0556
0557
0358
0359
0360
0361
0362
0363
0361*
0365
0366
0367
0368
0369
0370
0371
0372
0371*
0375
0376
3053
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3051.
5062
506>
306lt
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
30 7 0
30 71
3072
3073
507'*
3076
3077
3078
730228
730228
730228
730228
750228
730228
730228
730228
730228
730301
730501
750501
750501
750501
750501
730301
7303Q1
730301
730502
750302
750302
750502
730302
730502
68
70
72
71
72
67
72
72
63
72
68
72
69
72
72
72
72
71
68
69
66
68
70
72
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
FORD
OLDS
MERC
CHEV
RAMB
PLYM
CHRY
FORD
FORD
DODG
DODG
DODG
FORD
OLDS
FORD
MERC
DATS
CAPR
IMPA
FURY
IMPA
SATE
BELV
CATA
MUST
CUTL
MONR
BISC
GREM
FURY
NEWP
PINT
TORI
DART
DEMO
POLA
FAIR
F85
MUST
MARQ
510
596
550
560
550
318
318
1(00
302
350
UOO
307
258
318
400
122
351
225
225
318
302
350
289
U29
097
It 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 I*
2 1
1 1
1 5
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
UOOO
1*000
1*000
UOOO
3500
UOOO
U500
3000
5500
U500
UOOO
2500
UOOO
U500
2500
UOOO
5000
5500
UOOO
5500
5500
5000
5000
2000
15.2
12.0
15.2
12.0
11.2
12.0
1U.O
10.3
12.3
1U.O
12.0
9.U
15.2
1U.O
9.U
13.2
10.3
11.2
12.0
11.2
11.2
10.3
1U.7
8.3
58
56
58
60
60
60
60
60
59
58
60
61
6U
6U
63
65
66
66
62
65
62
60
60
61
72
78
68
68
70
72
68
68
68
69
70
70
69
73
70
71
73
72
69
78
72
76
75
68
30.29
30.25
30.18
30.20
30.21
30.19
30.18
30.18
30.18
30.15
50.16
50.15
50.05
50.02
50.02
50.05
50.03
30.05
50.12
30. 1U
50.15
30. OU
30.03
30.05
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 N
8 Y
8 Y
U Y
8 Y
5 Y
6 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
U Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N N Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N N Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
Y Y Y
039961
028779
01786U
022817
OOU888
079270
017013
019758
07U867
02U058
078653
008225
OU6032
01725U
019959
011725
022156
016291
061622
036015
068U86
075158
OU5515
007701
25
25
25
26
21
19
26
19
2U
22
25
21
2U
25
11
20
16
17
2U
20
20
19
22
12
610
610
610
690
610
610
580
580
560
515
610
600
610
680
810
610
610
780
600
510
650
610
610
710
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
14
H
D
D
D
D
D
51.0
26.0
31.0
31.0
U8.0
50.0
29.0
29.0
30.0
28.0
25.0
35.0
5U.O
5U.O
5U.O
30.0
38.0
k2.Q
15.0
27.0
53.0
29.0
5U.O
UO.O
+08.0
+ 08.0
+ 00.0
+ 06.0
+OU.O
+ OU.O
+ 06.0
+ OU.O
+ 00.0
+ 10.0
+08.0
-02.0
+OU.O
+ 06.0
+06.0
+ OU.O
+ 07.0
+ OU.O
-20.0
+ 08.0
+ 10.0
+ OU.O
+ OU.O
+ 07.0
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
¥ N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
K N
M N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH0 TST0 DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0377
0378
0379
0380
0381
0382
0383
038U
0385
0385R
0386
0387
0388
0389
0390
0391
0392
0393
0393R
0391*
0395
0396
0397
0397R
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
308U
3085
3086
3087
3101
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
309U
3095
3107
3096
3097
3098
3099
3115
730302
730301
730302
730302
730302
730303
730301
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730303
730305
730305
730306
730306
67
69
72
67
67
68
72
70
68
68
66
69
66
71
69
71
72
71
71
67
68
71
67
67
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
MERC
MERC
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
DODG
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
RAMB
CHEV
OLDS
BUIC
BUIC
IMPA
SEDA
MAVE
IMPA
BELA
IMPA
VEGA
CATA
MONG
MONG
MUST
CAPR
SEDA
CHAR
ELCA
MUST
SEDA
MALI
MALI
AMER
IMPA
DELT
SPEC
SPEC
283
091
302
327
283
307
11*0
1*00
302
302
200
350
078
383
350
302
097
307
307
232
327
350
300
300
2 1
1 l*
2 1
J» 1
2 1
2 1
2 3
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 3
l» 1
1 U
l* 1
I* 1
2 1
1 l»
2 1
2 1
2 3
It 1
it 1
2 1
2 1
it 000
2000
3000
1*000
itOOO
1*500
2500
U500
3500
3500
2500
UOOO
2000
3500
1*000
3000
2000
3500
3500
3000
1*000
5000
3500
3500
13.2
8.3
10.3
12.0
12.0
12.7
9.1*
11*. 0
11.2
11.2
9.1*
13.2
8.3
12.3
13.2
11.3
8.3
11.2
11.2
10.3
13.2
11*. 7
12.3
12.3
62
61*
63
60
63
61*
61*
65
68
66
68
66
66
65
68
6U
66
67
65
68
60
61*
66
70
68
70
70
68
72
71
72
72
72
70
7U
71
72
68
75
68
70
71
72
7U
69
71
76
80
30.06
30.07
30.06
30.06
30.06
30.10
30.10
30.09
30.06
29.83
30.01*
30.01
29.99
29.95
29.96
29.96
29.95
29.95
29. 85
29.93
29.93
29.91*
29.92
29.81*
8 Y
It N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
i* Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 N
8 Y
I* N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
1* N
8 Y
8 Y
6 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
N N
N Y
Y Y
N N
N N
N Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
N N
N Y
N N
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N N
N Y
Y Y
N N
N N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
069353
01*821*9
009133
053806
092807
078823
017757
012660
081252
081252
0991*1*8
056131*
05631*0
031211*
071838
016715
005067
026761
026761
031U35
0561*1*1*
026698
051*111*
051*111*
115
11
15
2U
2U
215
11
26
20
20
16
23
11
21
25
20
11
20
20
16
25
25
17
17
1100
8UO
610
580
5UO
605
920
710
550
580
890
620
81*0
780
500
610
780
1*80
1*90
1050
680
670
71*0
720
N
N
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
D
N
D
N
D
D
D
N
D
D
N
D
D
D
D
28.0
1*8.0
30.0
31*. 0
29.0
31.0
31*. 0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Ul.O
27.0
52.0
28.0
31*. o
29.0
38.0
30.0
29.0
31*. 0
27.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
+ 02.0
+ 06.0
+ 06.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 08.0
+ 06.0
+ 12.0
+ 03.0
+ OU. 0
+ 01*. 0
-08.0
+ 02.0
+ 07.5
+ 06.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 06.0
+ 06.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 01*. 0
+08.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH* TST0 DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0398
0399
OUOO
OUOl
OU01R
OU02
01*03
Oi*0i«
OitOS
OU05R
01*06
01*07
OU08
01*09
01*10
OU12
01*13
01)11*
OU1UR
OU15
01*16
01*17
01*18
01*19
3100
3102
3103
3101*
3119
3105
3106
3 1 OS
3 101;
3120
3110
3111
3112
3113
311U
3117
3113
3121
3133
3122
3123
3121»
3125
3125
730306
730306
730306
730506
730306
730306
730306
730306
730306
730306
730306
730306
730306
750306
730306
730306
730307
730307
730307
730307
730307
730307
750307
730307
72
68
72
70
70
71
70
70
70
70
69
66
70
71
67
68
67
66
66
69
71
69
69
67
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
FORD
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
PONT
BUIC
FORD
MERC
OLDS
BUIC
FORD
CADF
CADI
FORD
FORD
PLYM
FORD
PONT
SKYL
GALA
KING
TORI
TORI
CAPR
SATE
MAVE
CUTL
CUTL
CATA
LESA
FAIR
COUG
CUTL
ELEC
MUST
DEVI
DEVI
FALC
GALA
VALI
MUST
TEMP
350
390
350
302
302
1*02
318
200
350
350
UOO
31*0
250
351
330
1*30
289
1*29
1*29
302
351
225
351
326
l*
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
l*
1
2
2
l*
l*
l*
(4
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1*000
1*000
1*500
3500
3500
5000
3500
2500
1*000
1*000
1*500
UOOO
3500
3500
5500
1*500
5000
5000
5000
5500
1*000
5000
3000
3500
13.
13.
11*.
11.
11.
11*.
12.
9.
13.
13.
11*.
13.
11.
12.
12.
li».
10.
11*.
11*.
11.
13.
10.
11.
11.
2
2
0
2
2
7
3
it
2
2
0
2
2
5
5
0
5
7
7
2
2
5
5
2
68
65
67
67
60
65
65
65
62
60
66
69
70
69
68
66
61
61
60
62
65
65
6U
61*
77
72
71*
75
68
70
70
71*
68
68
72
7U
76
75
76
80
70
68
70
72
86
86
85
86
29.89
29.82
29.82
29.82
29.92
29.87
29.87
29.85
29.85
29.92
29.81
29.85
29.81*
29.85
29.82
29.81*
29.89
29.95
29.96
29.96
30.05
30.05
50.01
50.00
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
Y Y
Y N
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y Y
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y Y
N N
Y N
Y N
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
012758
068580
0161*89
01*7586
OU7386
021536
027772
035950
033718
035718
051*590
0261*09
055071
026902
056017
051*079
09021*1
060901*
060901*
0551*51
028963
OU2760
052527
056211*
20
21*
18
20
20
23
19
16
20
20
25
25
20
20
25
25
16
2l»
21*
16
25
18
20
26
680
610
580
510
51*0
710
590
750
610
600
610
670
550
660
600
51*0
610
600
600
580
625
570
51*0
1*60
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
H
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
52.0
52.0
28.0
29.0
29.0
29.0
38.0
1*6.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
31.0
27.0
32.0
51.0
5U. 0
31.0
30. 0
30.0
31.0
32.0
35.0
52.0
31*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 02.0
+ 02.0
+ 08.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+06.0
+ 05.0
-02.0
+ 06.0
+ 01*. 0
-05.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
+ 00.0
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 03.0
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
K N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
-------
ts>
IO
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '51'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH# TST# DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL-TIME L-E
01*20
01*21
OU22
01*23
Ol*2i*
01*25
Oi»26
01*27
OU28
OU28R
01*29
01*30
01*51
01*32
01*51*
01*35
01*56
01*37
OU37R
01*38
01*39
OUi(0
Oi*i*l
OUU2
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
5132
313U
3135
3136
31U9
3137
3138
3139
31 Ul
31l*-2
311*3
31UI*
311*5
3150
311*6
311*7
31U8
3151
3152
730307
730307
730307
730307
730307
730307
730307
730307
730-308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730308
730309
730309
730309
70
72
66
71
69
69
71
68
72
72
68
66
70
.68
69
71
72
72
72
70
66
67
66
68
FORD
GHEV
PLYM
PONT
BUIC
FORD
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
FORD
FORD
BUIC
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
BUIC
BUIC
PONT
MERC
DODG
CHEV
FORD
GALA
MALI
VALI
SAFA
ELEC
STAW
LEMA
CATA
LEMA
LEMA
FAIR
MUST
LESA
NEWP
NOVA
VEGA
PICK
LIMI
LIMI
LEMA
COMM
DART
BELA
FAIR
351
307
225
1*55
U30
390
350
1*00
350
350
289
289
350
383
230
11*0
350
1*55
1*55
350
390
225
283
200
2
2
1
2
i*
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
l*
2
1
1
l*
l*
l*
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1*000
3500
5000
5000
1*500
1*500
3500
1*000
3500
3500
3500
3000
1*000
.1*000
3000
2500
1*000
5000
5000
3500
1*500
3000
1*000
3000
13.2
•11.2
10.5
11*. 7
1U. '0
IfuO
12.5
15.2
12.5
12.5
11.2
10.3
13.2
15.2
10.5
9.U
12.0
It*. 7
11*. 7
12.3
11*. 0
10.3
12.0
10.5
62
6U
65
65
65
62
62
62
65
70
66
70
70
71
71
72
70
68
71
67
69
67
71
72
80
79
75
71
71*
72
71
69
69
71*
75
79
79
81
77
78
76
7i»
78
72
76
70
76
81
30.00
29.98
29.96
29.96
29.97
29.97
29.91*
2~9.91
29.93
29.96
29.9U
29.93
29.92
29.89
29.90
29.89
29.89
29.90
29.9U
29.95
29.95
29.96
29. 00
29.88
8 Y
8 Y
6 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 'Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 Y
l* Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 Y
8 Y
6 Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
OU1975
015512
060665
021559
026561
^039533
029Ul»0
07U815
011365
011565
058950
01*071*8
03U585
065017
035657
018705
019960
011*555
01U555
029095
000591
0911*88
065056
061*981*
21*
20
18
25
25
23
20
26
20
20
20
16
25
22
18
11
22
25
25
20
25
18
20
20
560
760
620
61*0
680
610
610
61*0
650
750
610
6'1*0
610
650
1000
880
880
610
600
620
61*0
620
610
1*80
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
N
N
N
b
D
D
D
D
D
D
30.0
30.0
U5.0
31.0
31.0
31.0
29.0
25.0
28.0
27.0
27.0
27.0
3U. 0
30.^0
36.0
5U. 0
51.0
51.0
31.0
29.0
30.0
38.0
27.0
1*5.0
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
+ 02.0
+ 10.0
+ 09.0
+ 08.0
+ 10.0
+ 15.0
+ 08.0
+ 09.0
+ 06.0
+ 09.0
+ 00.0
+ 10.0
+ 06.0
+ 02.0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 10.0
+ 12.0
-01*. 0
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y.N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
•Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y .N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
HOUSTON
VEH# TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
01*1*3
Okkk
Ol*l»5
OUU6
Oi»i*7
01*1*8
Ot*l«9
01*50
01*51
OU52
01*53
OU5I*
01*55
01*56
OU57
01*58
01*59
01*60
01*61
01*62
01*63
OU6t*
OU65
OU66
3153
3158*
3155
3156
3157
315S
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3161*
3165
3166
3167
3168
3165
3170
3171
3172
3173
3m
317$
3176
730309
730309
730309
730309
730309
730309
730310
730310
730310
730310
730310
730310
730312
730312
730312
730312
730313
730313
730313
730313
730313
730311*
730311*
73031U
67
70
71
67
67
70
70
69
71
70
68
71
72
70
70
67
6H
66
71
69
69
72
71
72
FORD
PLYM
FORD
FORD
CHRY
KAMB
BUIC
BUIC
VOLK
VOLK
PONT
PLYM
FORD
DODG
TOYO
CHEV
PLYM
DODG
DATS
DODG
MERC
PLYM
LINC
VOLK
FAIR
VALI
MAVE
LTD
NEWP
AMBA
ELEC
LESA
SEDA
SEDA
FIRE
DUST
COUN
POL A
CORL
!MPA
FURY
POLA
DELU
SUPE
MARQ
FURY
CONT
FAST
289
225
200
390
383
301*
1*55
350
097
097
350
198
1*29
318
071
283
318
383
097
383
1*29
360
1*60
103
I* 3
1 3
1 3
2 1
2 1
2 1
I* 1
i* 1
1 l»
1 it
1* 1
1 3
1* 1
2 1
1 l*
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 i*
l* 1
2 1
2 1
l* 1
0 1*
3000
3000
2500
1*000
1*000
1*000
1*500
1*000
2000
2000
3500
3500
1*500
1*000
2000
1*000
UOOO
1*000
2000
3500
1*500
1*000
5000
2750
10.3
10.3
9.U
12.0
13.2
12.0
li*. 0
13.2
8.3
8.3
11.2
11.2
11*. 0
12.0
8.3
12.0
12.0
13.2
8.3
11.2
11*. 0
12.0
11*. 7
9.9
70
68
68
69
68
70
72
72
71
6U
62
60
60
61
60
60
68
70
70
70
70
70
71
71
76
72
73
75
73
77
76
76
78
76
75
78
81*
81*
83
81*
71
71*
75
76
71*
72
75
75
29.86
29.82
29.82
29.82
29.78
29.78
29. 7U
29.76
29.77
29.76
29.7U
29.73
30.15
30.15
30.11
30.07
29.89
29.88
29.86
29.82
29.81
29.78
29.83
29.81*
8 Y N
6 Y N
6 Y Y
8 Y N
8 Y N
8 Y N
8 Y N
8 Y N
1* Y Y
l* N N
8 Y N
6 Y Y
8 Y Y
8 Y N
l* Y N
8 N N
8 Y N
8 Y N
l* N Y
8 Y N
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
I* N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
051162
069893
01*5281*
08085U
078887
030223
031397
059005
01522U
036501
085936
019U17
013839
021979
028675
039879
097U17
1002U2
035663
0635UO
061*065
012915
011019
005101
20
18
16
21*
21*
21
25
25
11
11
18
17
21
2i*
11
2i»
21*
25
11
21
21*
23
22
11
600 N
7UO N
1150 N
61*0 D
600 D
610 D
580 D
620 D
8UO N
980 K
1050 D
800 N
5UO D
600 D
1200 N
5UO D
600 D
51*0 D
800 N
660 D
580 D
560 D
610 D
1000 N
29.0
1*0.0
31*. 0
31.0
28.0
29.0
32.0
32.0
51*. 0
51*. 0
32.0
37.0
28.0
35.0
51*. 0
31.0
28.0
50.0
38.0
32.0
30.0
38.0
31*. 0
52.0
+ 00.0
+ 00.0
+ 08.0
+ 06.0
+ 08.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 02.0
+ 02.0
+02.0
+ 00.0
+ 06.0
+ 02.5
+ 10.0
+ 05.0
-02.0
-01*. 0
-10.0
+ 02.5
+20.0
+05.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 00.0
+ 08.0
+ 05.0
N N
N N
N N
N N
V N
K N
Y N
Y N
M N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
H N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
.. HOUSTON
TST# .DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
OU67
OU68
01(69
OU70
OU71
OU72
OU73
OU7I*
Ol»75
OU76
0477
01*78
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
318U
3185
3186
3187
3188
730311*
730311*
730311*
730311*
730315
730315
730315
730316
730316
730316
730316
730316
71
68
70
72
68
67
70
68
72
70
70
67
OPEL
CHEV
DODG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
CADE
CAMA
CORO
POLA
THUN
NOVA
TORI
SEDA
CAPR
KING
NOVA
COUG
116
250
383
-360
1*29
191*
351
091
1*02
1*51*
250
289
2
1
l*
i*
i«
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
l*
1
1
3
1
2500
3000
UOOO
1*000
1*500
3000
3500
2000
1*500
1*500
3000
3500
9.
10.
13.
13.
11*.
10.
12.
8.
11*.
It*.
10.
12.
l*
3
2
2
0
3
3
3
0
0
3
3
71*
76
70
70
70
72
71
7i»
60
61
62
59
78
81
78
78
72
7U
73
80
73
70
71*
70
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
30.
30.
83
82
79
76
78
80
80
9U
96
96
00
05
l* Y
6 N
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
6 Y
8 Y
I* N
8 Y
8 Y
6 N
8 Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
N N
N Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
022015
057057
058667
017569
OU6015
07101*3
050160
Oi*2731
01621*3
025716
01*8853
082275
11
X8
21
23
21*
18
;>.o
11
2i»
22
18
17
800
600
580
680
720
950
580
1*1*0
580
760
680
580
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
N
D
D
N
D
51*. 0
35.0
35.0
31*. o
29.0
36.0
30.0
31*. 0
30.0
32.0
32.0
27.0
+ 00.0
-01*. 0
+ 00.0
+ 00.0
+ 08.0
+ 06.0
+ 02.0
+ 07.5
-12.0
+ 12.0
-06.0
+ 09.0
N N
N N
Y N
Y .N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
CHICAGO
VEH* TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0501
0502
0503
0501*
0505
0506
0507
0508
0509
0510
0511
0512
0513
0511*
0515
0516
0517
0518
0519
0520
0521
0522
0525
0521*
1001
1002
1003
lOQit
1005
1006
1007
1003
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1011*
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
102U
7301*16
730U16
730U16
7501*16
730U16
7301*16
7301*16
7301*16
7301*16
730U16
730U16
7301*16
7301*16
730U16
730U17
730U17
7301*17
7301*17
7301*17
730U17
7301*17
7301*17
7301*17
7301*17
71
72
72
72
71
71
71
71
71
72
72
70
71
70
70
70
72
70
69
72
67
68
71
71
FORD
RAMB
BUIC
FORD
FORD
DODG
FORD
FORD
VOLK
OLDS
FORD
OLDS
PONT
MERC
PONT
PLYM
CHEV
FORD
FORD
BUIC
VOLK
FORD
LINC
CHEV
GALA
HORN
STAW
STAW
MUST
DEMO
GALA
WAVE
SEDA
98
GALA
DELT
GRAN
MARQ
CATA
FURY
CAPR
GALA
LTD
STAW
SEDA
FALC
MARK
IMPA
351
258
1*55
351
302
225
351
200
097
1*55
351
350
1*55
1*29
1*00
318
1*00
351
302
1*55
091
200
1*60
350
2 1
1 1
I* 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 I*
1* 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
I* 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1* 1
1 I*
1 1
l* 1
2 1
1*000
3500
5500
1*500
3500
3000
1*000
3000
2000
5000
UOOO
1*500
1*500
5000
1*500
1*000
1*500
1*000
1*000
5500
2000
3000
5500
1*000
13.2
11.2
15.3
11*. 0
12.3
10.3
12.0
10.3
8.3
11*. 7
13.2
Ii*. 0
11*. 0
11*. 7
11*. 0
13.2
11*. 0
12.0
12.0
15.3
8.3
10,. 5
15.5
12.0
59
59
62
61
5r8
58
55
55
56
55
57
55
56
55
55
53
51
53
52
.52
53
58
59
58
72
70
70
73
71
71
70
68
70
69
75
70
72
71
70
71
69
71
72
73
73
71
72
70
29.20
29.15
29.10
29.15
29.19
29.2U
29.29
29.51
29.51
29.51
29.52
29.52
29.52
29.52
29.55
29.57
29.57
29.57
29.56
29.55
29.56
29.U5
29.1*1*
29.1*1*
8 Y Y
6 Y Y
8 Y Y
8 Y^ Y
8 N Y
6 N Y
8 N Y
6 N Y
1* N Y
8 Y Y
8 N Y
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 Y N
8 N N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 N N
8 Y Y
1* N N
6 N N
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
056670-
059961
018200
012152
017611*
018565
01*6712
016581
009708
002861
008155
0187U1
050510
01*6511
029626
023030
01601*9
056711*
063805
019069
085U79
01*621*1*
016771
0381*16
23
16
23
21
20
17
23
16
10
25
22
25
21*
21*
26
21*
21*
23
21*
22
11
16
22
25
380
61*0
680
675
575
530
500
1*60
920
610
6UO
650
710
520
630
575
580
500
<»90
720
61*0
1*60
500
6UO
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
H
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
0
N
D
D
D
32.0
28.0
3U;0
28.0
51*. 0
1*5.0
35.0
1*3.0
56.0
26.0
52.0
52.0
53.0
32.0
30.0
32.0
27.0
33.0
32.0
29.0
50.0
1*1.0
28 . 0
32.0
+06.0
+08.0
+ 00.0
+ 06.0
+ 05.0
+ 00.0
+ 07.0
-02.0
+ 00.0
+ 08.0
+ 06.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 02.0
+ 08.0
+ 00.0
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
+ 02.0
+06.0
+ 02.5
-02.0
+ 06.0
+ 02.0
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N.
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
PROJECT CODE '31'
CHICAGO
VEH# TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DUEL TIME L E
0525
0526
0527
0528
0529
0530
0531
0532
0533
053i»
0535
0536
0537
0538
0539
05UO
051*1
05U2
05U3
051*5
051*6
051*7
051*8
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
103U
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
101*0
101*1
101*2
10U3
10<*l*
101+5
101*6
101*7
10U8
7301*17
7301*17
730U17
7301*17
7301*18
7301*18
730U18
730U18
730U18
730U18
7301*18
7301*18
7301*18
7301*18
730U18
730U18
7301*18
7301*18
730U18
7301*19
7301*19
730U19
730U19
7301*19
69
69
70
66
67
72
70
68
69
69
66
72
72
72
71
72
69
72
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
PLYM
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
FORD
BUIC
DODG
CHEV
BUIC
VOLK
CUTL
LTD
IMPA
FAIR
VENT
SQUA
LESA
SATE
SKYL
GALA
CHEL
SATE
MAVE
LESA
MONA
MALI
Wl LD
SEDA
350 2
390 l*
350 2
200 1
1*00 2
66 PONT BONN
68 MERC MONT
67 CHEV BELA
67 PLYM FURY
71 OLDS CUTL
72 OLDS CUTL
103 0
350 l*
273 2
350 2
302 2
191* l
318 2
302 2
350 2
383 2
307 2
1*30 I*
097 1
389 2
302 2
283 2
318 2
350 2
350 2
1 3500 11.2 60 72 29.1*1* 8 Y N Y Y 020189 25
1 UOOO 13.2 59 70 29.1*1* 8 Y N Y Y 066760 2k
1 1*000 12.0 59 69 29.1*1* 8 Y N Y Y 030.799 25
1 3000 10.3 59 70 29.1*1* 6 N N N Y 01*3365 25
1 1*000 13.2 59 70 29.U7 8 Y N Y Y 06301*1* 18
l* 2500 9.1* 59 71 29.U8 l* N Y Y Y 00657U 16
1 1*500 11*.0 59 70 29.1*8 8 Y N Y Y 01*1*001 20
1 3500 11.2 61 71 29.U7 8 N N Y Y 023335 25
1 1*000 13.2 60 71 29.1*7 8 Y N Y Y 028573 13
1 1*000 12.0 60 73 29.U6 8 Y N Y Y 035387 20
1 3000 10.3 60 71 29.U5 6 N N Y Y 055111 20
1 3500 11.2 62 7t» 29.1*1* 8 Y Y Y Y 01391*0 21
1 3000 10.3 62 70 29.1*0 8 Y Y Y Y 0012U8 15
1 1*500 II*.0 61 70 29.1*1 8 Y Y Y Y 009132 25
1 1*500 II*.0 62 70 29.1*2 8 Y N Y Y 017138 23
1 3500 11.2 63 73 29.1*1 8 Y Y Y Y 006399 19
1 1*500 II*.0 62 72 29.1*1 8 Y N Y Y 01*311*8 25
I* 2000 8.3 62 72 29.UO I* N Y Y Y 011001* 10
1 1*500 II*.0 60 70 29.38 8 Y N N Y 0771*29 20
1 3500 11.2 60 70 29.39 8 N N Y Y 028751 17
1 1*500 12.7 60 70 29.39 8 Y N Y Y 077090 22
1 1*000 12.0 61 72 29.1*0 8 N N Y Y 073051* 25
1 1*000 13.2 60 70 29.1*0 8 Y Y Y Y 025290 20
1 1*000 13.2 60 70 29.UO 8 Y Y Y Y 002907 20
580 D 31*.0 +OU.0 N N
5UO D 30.0 +06.0 Y N
580 D 32.0 +03.0 N N
520 D 38.0 -01*.0 N N
575 D 30.0 -OU.0 Y N
960 N 50.0 +02.0 N N
700 D 32.0 +06.0 Y N
6UO D 26.0 +05.0 N N
1*80 D 30.0 +02.0 Y N
580 D 31*.0 +07.0 N N
610 D 32.0 +02.0 N N
650 D 33.0 +00.0 N N
610 D 30.0 +03.0 N N
600 D 30.0 +05.0 Y N
610 D 35.0 +00.0 Y N
750 D 31.0 +03.0 N N
560 D 29.0 +01.0 Y N
910 N 36.0 +10.0 N N
5i*0 D 30.0 +02.0 Y N
560 D 31.0 +06.0 N N
520 D 33.0 +07.0 N N
580 D 32.0 +10.0 N N
700 D 32.0 +05.0 Y N
690 D 30.0 +01.0 Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
CHICAGO
VEH# TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
051*9
0550
0551
0552
0553
055i»
0555
0556
0557
0558
0559
0560
0561
0562
0563
0561*
0565
0567
0568
0569
0570
0571
0572
0573
10«*9
1050
1051
1052
1053
1051)
1055
i056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1061*
1065
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
7501*19
750U19
730U19
730U19
730U19
7301*19
730U19
730U9
730U19
730U20
7301*20
730U20
730U20
7301*20
7301*20
7501(20
7301*20
7301*20
7301*20
7301*20
730U20
7301*23
7301*23
7301*23
69
72
71
72
71
71
68
70
71
70
70
72
70
72
70
69
70
68
68
72
66
70
70
66
CHEV
CHRY
BUIC
TOYO
PLYM
OPEL
OLDS
BUIC
VOLK
CHEV
CHRY
PLYM
CHEV
CADI
FORD
DODG
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
DODG
CADI
VOLK
PONT
CHEV
IMPA
NEWP
SKYL
CORN
DUST
1900
CUTL
ELEC
SEDA
CAMR
STAW
FURY
IMPL
COUP
FAIR
MONA
FAIR
CORV
WILD
DEMO
DEVI
SEDA
LEMA
IMPA
327
1*00
350
120
198
116
350
1*55
097
350
l*l*0
360
UOO
1*72
302
383
250
161*
1*30
225
U29
097
350
283
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 I*
1 1
2 1
2 1
U 1
1 U
2 1
l* 1
2 1
2 1
I* 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
U 1
1 1
l* 1
1 l*
2 1
2 1
1*000
1*500
1*000
2500
3000
2500
3500
1*500
2000
3500
5000
1*000
1*000
5000
3500
1*000
3500
2500
1*500
3000
U500
2000
1*000
UOOO
13.2
1U.O
13.2
9.1*
10.3
. 9.1*
12.3
11*. 0
8.3
11.2
11*. 7
13.2
13.2
11*. 7
12.3
12.0
11.2
9.1*
11*. 0
10.3
11*. 0
8.5
13.2
12.0
60 70
60 70
63 72
65 71*
6U 71*
62 72
65 71*
65 75
61* 71*
51 69
61 71
61 71
53 73
61* 71*
65 79
65 75
67 76
65 7U
66 71*
6b 75
66 7U
55 69
5i« 68
53 69
29.1*0
29. UO
29.25
29.25
29.32
29.32
29.32
29.32
29.32
29.38
29.1*1
29.U1
29.1*5
29.1*1*
29.1*0
29.52
29.51
29.1*9
29.1*6
29.U1*
29.U3
29.29
29.29
29. 29
8
8
8
l*
6
1*
8
8
l*
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
8
6
8
U
8
8
N N
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
N N
Y N
N Y
N N
Y N
Y Y
Y N
Y Y
N N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N Y
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
0361*12
012502
028U06
001*758
01*31*1*1*
031U80
058601
032082
026768
023761
01UU76
015326
033131
0071*53
023963
01*3095
0261*82
OU2288
01*1*609
003257
10001*8
02728U
015677
052001
16
25
23
13
13
10
20
25
10
19
23
23
20
27
20
24
20
11
17
1.5
21*
10
22
20
660 D
610 D
650 D
800 N
5UO D
850 D
600 D
5UO D
800 M
610 D
550 D
580 D
1*70 D
670 D
500 D
520 0
650 D
U80 D
590 0
600 D
580 D
520 N
590 D
520 D
50.0
50.0
50.0
51*. 0
38.0
51*. 0
32.0
25.0
1*8.0
28.0
5U. 0
28.0
50.0
51.0
51*. 0
28.0
35.0
32.0
54.0
1(6.0
31.0
52.0
51.0
51.0
-05.0
+01*. 0
+ 01*. 0
+ 00.0
+ 05.0
+ 00.0
-01.0
+ 00.0
+ 00.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 02.0
+ 05.0
+ 09.0
+ 06.0
+ 08.0
-02.0
-02.0
-OU,0
+ 06.0
+ 00.0
+ 01*. 0
+ 07.5
+ 05.0
+ 08.0
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
n N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
CHICAGO
VEH0 TST* DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
057U
0575
0576
0577
0578
0579
0580
0581
0583
0584
0585
0586
0587
0588
0589
0590
0591
0592
0592R
0593
059l»
059UR
0595
0596
1071*
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1083
1081*
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1106
1093
109i»
1105
1095
1096
7301*23
7301*23
7301*23
730U2U
7301*23
7301*23
730U23
7301*23
7301*21*
730U2U
730U2U
7301*21*
7301*21*
730l*2U
7301*21*
7301*21*
7301*21*
7301*21*
730U21*
7301*21*
730i*2U
7301*21*
730U21*
730U21*
68
70
68
72
68
69
72
69
69
71
68
70
71
72
68
71
67
71
71
68
70
70
69
68
CHEV
FORD
CHRY
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
FORD
DODG
DODG
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
VOLK
CADI
CHEV
CAMA
MAVE
NEWP
CAPR
CHEV
BUG
LTD
IMPA
RANC
VEGA
BELA
COUN
CAPR
MONA
CORN
LI Ml
CUST
IMPA
IMPA
MUST
SEDA
SEDA
DEVI
BELA
327
200
383
122
396
091
UOO
350
351
11*0
307
351
098
360
318
1*55
289
350
350
289
097
097
1*72
307
I*
1
2
2
i«
1
2
l*
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
l*
2
2
2
2
1
1
i*
2
1
1
1
i*
1
i*
1
1
1
i*
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l*
l*
1
1
3500
2500
1*000
2000
3500
2000
1*000
UOOO.
1*500
2500
1*500
1*500
2500
1*500
3500
5000
UOOO
1*000
UOOO
3000
2000
2000
5000
1*000
12.
9.
13.
8.
12.
8.
13.
13.
11*.
9.
12.
11*.
9.
11*.
11.
11*.
12.
13.
13.
10.
8.
8.
11*.
12.
3
l*
2
3
3
3
2
2
0
l*
7
0
l*
0
2
7
0
2
2
3
3
3
7
0
56
57
56
56
55
51*
56
55
51
53
53
52
53
50
50
55
51*
5U
53
55
51*
53
5U
52
73
73
70
69
68
68
68
70
68
68
69
68
69
68
70
6G
68
68
68
70
70
68
68
69
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29
29
26
26
28
28
28
33
38
38
39
38
1*1
1*2
1+2
1*1
1*0
UO
36
1*0
39
36
37
36
8 N
6 Y
8 Y
l« N
8 Y
1* N
8 Y
8 Y
8 N
1* N
8 N
8 Y
l* N
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
8 Y
8 N
l* N
1* N
8 Y
8 N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
057276
030061*
052368
011115
072217
038021*
002313
050271*
01*1502
020875
01*581*1
039931
017390
000962
OU7137
02U6i»9
069868
010887
010887
01*1963
039690
039690
01*2617
0301U1*
18
16
25
12
20
10
17
25
23
11
22
23
12
23
21
25
25
2U
21*
16
10
10
26
25
570
51*0
710
1000
560
860
560
580
520
800
590
520
800
650
550
7UO
500
600
600
590
101*0
101*0
680
610
D
D
D
N
D
N
D
D
D
N
D
D
N
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
N
D
D
29.0
1*1.0
23.0
1*2.0
29.0
50.0
31.0
30.0
23.0
38.0
32.0
32.0
52.0
37.0
21*. 0
30.0
25.0
27.0
27.0
30.0
52.0
52.0
29.0
31*. 0
+ 09
-02
+ OU
-08
-06
+ 12
+ 00
+ 01*
+ 07
+ 05
+ 09
+ 10
+ 02
+ 02
+ 10
+ 02
-03
+ 02
+ 02
-03
+07
+ 07
+ 10
+ 10
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.5
.0
.0
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
CHICAGO
TSTtf DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0597
0598
0598R
0599
0599R
0600
0601
0602
0603
060U
0605
0606
0607
0608
0609
0610
0611
0612
0613
0613R
061U
0615
0616
0617
1097
1098
1115
1099
1118
1100
1101
1102
1105
110'*
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1115
lilt*
1110
1133
1117
1119
1120
1121
730U25
730U25
7301*25
7301*25
730U25
7301*25
7301*25
7301*25
7301*25
7301*25
7301*25
7301*25
730U25
730U25
7301*25
730U25
730U26
730U26
730U26
730U26
7301*26
730U26
7301*26
7301*26
72
71
71
72
72
71
69
66
71
71
67
69
66
71
70
68
68
66
69
69
67
69
67
69
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
MERC
PONT
CHEV
TOYO
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
CADI
VOLK
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
OLDS
BUIC
PONT
MONT
DELT
DELT
MONT
MONT
FIRE
MONT
GTO
MALI
CORO
CUTL
CAMA
BISC
CAPR
VALI
FLEE
SEDA
VALI
FURY
FURY
FIRE
98
LESA
LEMA
1*00
1*55
1*55
350
350
350
390
326
307
096
330
307
283
UOO
225
1*72
091
225
225
225
326
1*55
31*0
350
2 1
I* 1
l* 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
l* 1
2 1
1 l*
2 1
2 1
2 3
2 1
1 1
l* 1
1 l*
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1* 1
2 1
2 1
1*500
U500
U500
1*000
UOOO
3500
U500
1*000
3500
2000
3500
3500
1*000
1*500
3000
5000
2000
3000
1*000
1*000
3500
1*500
1*000
3500
1U. 0
11*. 0
11*. 0
13.2
13.2
12.3
lU. 0
12.0
11.2
8.3
12.3
11.2
12.0
1U. 0
10.3
11*. 7
8.3
10.3
12.0
12.0
11.2
11*. 0
13.2
12.3
53
52
52
51
1*9
51
52
50
51
52
52
55
55
56
53
55
52
52
43
52
52
52
1*9
56
69
69
68
68
69
68
69
68
69
70
66
69
72
71
68
70
68
63
68
69
69
68
69
68
29.38
29.39
29.1*2
29.38
29.U6
29.38
29.38
29.38
29.38
29.38
29.37
29.37
29.1*0
29.1*0
29.1*0
29.38
29.1*2
29.1*2
29.1*5
29.31*
29. 1*6
29.1*7
29.1*2
29.1*0
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
1* N
8 Y
8 N
8 N
8 Y
6 N
8 Y
l* N
6 N
6 N
6 N
8 Y
8 Y
8 N
8 Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
N N Y
Y Y Y
Y Y Y
N N Y
N Y Y
N N Y
Y Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N N Y
N Y Y
N Y Y
N N Y
N Y Y
N N Y
N Y Y
008761
02U160
021*160
007805
007805
025161
01*3951
072618
008088
013732
029979
026U75
051068
026187
028061*
030893
01*5516
039711
062215
062215
055683
057035
01*3038
026308
22
215
25
19
19
17
2U
12
20
12
2!>
11)
20
23
18
26
10
18
2 1*
2 U
18
2!;
25
21
560
590
600
670
61*0
1*90
600
690
510
950
51*0
550
580
6UO
1*10
780
1300
710
530
550
6!*0
550
560
610
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
N
D
D
D
K
L'
D
t!
D
D
D
D
33.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
28.0
31.0
31.0
56.0
30.0
29.0
27.0
30.0
35.0
33.0
57.0
1*6.0
U.O
1*7.0
32.0
28.0
32.0
32.0
+ 09.0
+ 07.0
+ 07.0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 12.0
+ 13.0
+ 16.0
+ OU. 0
+ 00.0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
+ 05.0
+ 10.0
+ 03.0
+ 10.0
+ 00.0
+ 00.0
+06.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 06.0
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
CHICAGO
VEH# TST0 DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT HP WB DB BAROM C A V X P ODOM. TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0619
0620
0621
0622
0623
0623R
0621*
062UR
0625
0626
0627
0627R
0628
0628R
0629
0630
0631
0632
0633
0631*
0635
0636
0636R
0637
1123
112U
1125
1126
1127
1136
1128
11U5
1129
1130
1131
111*6
1132
ni»i»
1131*
1135
1137
1138
1139
111*0
11U
11U2
1150
11U3
730U26
730i»26
7301*26
730U26
730U26
730U26
7301*27
7301*27
730U27
7301*27
7301*27
730U27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
730U27
7301*27
7301*27
7301*27
68
72
68
71
67
67
72
72
72
70
68
68
70
70
70
67
69
68
67
70
66
66
66
67
FORD
CHEV
PONT
CHEV
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
CHEV
FORD
PONT
PONT
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
CHRY
CHEV
RAMB
CHEV
DODG
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
LTD
CAMA
CATA
IMPA
RANG
RANC
RANG
RANC
CONC
CUST
TEMP
TEMP
MALI
MALI
TORO
NEWP
NOVA
JAVE
IMPA
CORO
COUN
GALA
GALA
COLO
390
350
1*00
350
390
390
351
351
1*02
302
350
350
307
307
U55
383
230
31*3
327
318
390
289
289
390
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
l*
2
2
2
2
2
1*
2
1
i*
i*
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1*000
3500
1*000
1*000
1*000
1*000
1*500
1*500
UOOO
1*000
1*000
UOOO
3500
3500
1*500
1*000
3000
3500
UOOO
1*000
1*500
1*000
1*000
1*500
13.
12.
13.
13.
13.
13.
12.
12.
13.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
11*.
13.
10.
11.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
11*.
2
3
2
2
2
2
7
7
2
0
0
0
3
3
0
2
3
2
0
0
7
0
0
0
51*
50
52
50
53
55
50
1*8
52
52
51
1*9
50
1*9
1*9
1*9
51*
72
52
52
58
52
50
52
68
68
68
68
68
72
69
68
69
70
70
68
70
68
72
72
68
69
68
68
68
66
68
68
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
29.
38
37
32
32
32
31
32
32
33
33
32
31*
32
32
33
32
30
30
30
29
29
29
33
28
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N N
N N
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
N Y
N N
N Y
N Y
N N
N Y
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
05U998
011602
063705
025965
053799
053799
012928
012928
011287
029889
081791
081791
02731*3
0273U3
0171(95
021977
057983
038152
080596
05031(6
095050
074185
071*185
108899
20
18
26
25
23
23
21
21
18
21*
20
20
20
20
25
25
18
19
22
2U
20
25
25
20
510
500
500
630
520
520
1*1*0
500
590
1*1*0
620
620
630
650
610
560
610
590
U10
71*0
610
500
500
590
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
N
D
D
D
D
30.0
29.0
31.0
31.0
28.0
28.0
38.0
38.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
32.0
31.0
32.0
27.0
37.0
33.0
31.0
31.0
36.0
32.0
29.0
29.0
32.0
+ 12.0
+ 08.0
+ 09.0
+ 07.0
+ 01*. 0
+OU. 0
+ 08.0
+ 08.0
+ 07.0
+ 03.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 03.0
+ 03.0
+ 08.0
+ 12.0
+ 06.0
+ 10.0
+ 05.0
+ 12.0
+ 03.0
-01*. 0
-01*. 0
+ 06.0
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
CHICAGO
PROJECT CODE '31'
VEH*
0638
0639
061*0
061*1
Q6U2
061*3
OSUl*
06U5
06U6
06U8
06U9
0650
0651
0652
0653
0651*
0655
0656
0657
0658
0659
0660
0661
0662
TST#
11U7
111*8
111*9
1151
1152
1153
115t
1155
1156
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
116!v
1165
1165
116?
1165
1169
1170
1171
1172
DATE
730U28
730U28
7301*28
730U28
7301*28
7301*28
730U28
7301*28
7301*28
730U30
7301*30
730U30
7301*30
7301*30
7301*30
730U30
7301*30
7301*30
730501
730501
730501
730501
730501
730501
YR
66
71
66
72
67
69
71
66
68
66
72
72
70
71
72
68
66
67
72
69
69
67
72
67
MAKE
MERC
PLYM
VOLK
PONT
CHEV
PONT
MERC
OLDS
FORD
BUIC
CHEV
DATS
TOYO
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
MODL
COLO
SATE
SEDA
LEMA
BELA
CATA
MONT
DELT
MUST
LESA
VEGA
510
CORO
CAPR
IMPA
THUN
IMPA
NOVA
THUN
NOVA
FURY
CAPR
IMPA
COUN
CID
390
318
078
350
283
1*00
1*00
330
289
3UO
11*0
097
116
UOO
350
1*29
283
19U
1*29
350
318
283
350
289
N T
2 1
2 1
1 i»
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 I*
1 I*
2 1
2 1
I* 1
2 1
1 1
l* 1
U 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
l* 3
IWT
1*500
3500
2000
3500
UOOO
1*000
UOOO
1*000
3000
1*000
2500
2500
2500
1*500
U500
1*500
1*000
3000
1*500
3000
1*000
UOOO
1*500
UOOO
HP
12.7
12.3
8.3
12.3
12.0
13.2
13.2
12.0
10.3
13.2
9.1*
9.1*
9.1*
11*. 0
1U. 0
lU. 0
12.0
10.3
11*. 0
11.3
13.2
13.2
12.7
12.0
WB DB
1*9 69
1*9 68
U9 68
52 70
51 70
52 70
50 68
5U 70
55 70
60 70
58 68
58 68
59 70
59 69
60 69
60 69
51 69
61 69
56 72
6U 73
63 70
62 70
61* 71
65 7U
BAROM
29.31*
29.33
29.32
29.33
29.33
29.37
29.37
29.37
29.37
29.32
29.31*
29.32
29.30
29.30
29.30
29.50
29.29
29.28
29.18
29.17
29.17
29.16
29.17
29.19
N A V
8 Y N
8 Y Y
1* N N
8 Y Y
8 N N
8 Y N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 N N
8 N N
1* N Y
l* N Y
U N N
8 Y Y
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 N N
6 N N
8 Y Y
8 Y N
8 N N
8 N N
8 Y Y
8 N N
X P
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
N Y
Y Y
N Y
ODOM.
051*1*1*3
02091*1*
06562U
011901*
050885
01*2621
028391
09371*8
039325
0960UO
012571
030050
052881
01*0566
019U76
038871*
082160
096775
01678U
101630
05891*5
061*776
012889
06U936
TC
20
19
10
20
21*
26
22
25
16
25
11
12
12
21*
2U
21*
20
18
22
18
21
21+
25
20
IRPM
1*1*0
600
11*00
600
5UO
660
1*50
510
5UO
5UO
600
101*0
810
570
590
750
590
U80
1*00
510
660
USO
590
7UO
S
D
D
N
D
D
D
0
D
D
D
0
D
N
D
D
D
D
rt
u
D
D
0
D
D
0
DWEL
37.0
29.0
59.0
30.0
32.0
31.0
27.0
M.O
29.0
29.0
UO.O
52.0
52.0
29.0
32.0
31*. 0
3U.O
28.0
25.0
31.0
31.0
29.0
36.0
37.0
TIME
+ 17.0
+OU. 0
+ 02.0
+ 06.0
-02.0
+ 12.0
-03.0
+ 06.0
+ 09.0
-07.5
+ 09.0
+ 10.0
+ 00.0
+ 09.0
+ 09.0
+ 10.0
+ 05.0
+ 10.0
+ 10.0
+ 02.0
+ 03.0
+ 09.0
+ 10.0
+ 12.0
L E
Y N
Y N
N N
Y N
IV N
Y N
Y N
K N
N N
V N
N N
N N
N N
Y N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
Y N
V N
Y N
Y N
N N
N N
-------
TABLE 12, CONT'D
VEHICLE,INFORMATION SUMMARY
PROJECT CODE '31'
CHICAGO
VEH0 TST# DATE YR MAKE MODL CID N T IWT/ HP WB DB BAROM C A, V X;P ;ODOM., TC IRPM S DWEL TIME L E
0661* 1171* 730502 72 PONT GRAN U55 2 1 1*500 Iji.O ,6U 70 29;12 '8: Y Y -Y, Y mZoei* 25
0665 1175 730502 66 RAMB CLAS 232 11 3000 10.3. 60/70 29.12 6 N. N N :Y'. 0'6'6;7-2:5;-2;0;
0666 1176 730502 66 DODG CHAR 361 2 1 1*000 13:2-6:6 69! 29;1'5 8
-------
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
0010
0012
0013
0014
0015
0016
0017
0018
0020
0021
0022
0024
0026
0027
0028
0029
0030
0031
0033
0034
0035
0038
0039
YEAR
1969
1970
1970
1969
1972
1969
1970
1968
1970
1970
1966
1969
1970
1969
1968
1972
1970
1969
1971
1968
1971
1970
1971
1972
1966
1966
1970
1967
1970
1971
MAKE
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
FORD
PLYM
PONT
FORD
BUIC
FORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
VGLK
BUIC
CHEV
FORD
BUIC
CHEV
TOYO
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CID
472
307
350
390
350
350
351
230
200
97
352
318
350
302
430
200
351
350
400
350
97
455
307
429
425
283
71
289
350
350
HC
6.31
6«16
6*04
7.20
5.25
6.80
4.57
12.12
4.14
4.90
9.09
7.76
8. 11
7.06
11.24
3.67
1 1.01
6.60
8.56
4.62
4.14
7.08
6.94
5.84
13.93
9.64
5.85
8.59
6.69
6.77
CO
143.8
61 .2
109.2
134.7
91.2
105.5
86.8
89.0
54.6
90.6
116. 7
176.7
152.3
93 = 0
152.7
45.6
178.1
128.8
199.6
50«8
64.6
156.2
70.2
1 14.9
249.4
136.0
80-9
S14o3
103.6
150.5
C02
685-3
471 .3
506.9
521.2
671.0
527.8
561 .4
427.9
406.7
333.7
530.5
422.4
561.1
432.5
547.3
393.1
528.4
499.2
742.0
585.2
293.9
598.5
479.0
665.7
468.5
511.3
487.6
459.9
522.4
582.2
NO
3.34
3.97
3.41
2.26
3.55
2.42
2.56
2.91
2.26
2.58
4.15
0.98
2.67
2.31
4.30
3.52
2.73
2.38
1.77
2.87
1 .50
1.91
1 .92
3.17
1 .28
2.21
3.91
3.38
2.9i
1 .48
N02
0.87
0.83
0^68
G° 30
0.68
0.76
0.34
Oo56
0.30
0.38
0.98
0.03
0.96
0.37
1 » 36
0.95
0.38
0.32
0.12
0.67
0.15
0.19
0.28
0.59
O.li
Oo32
0*95
0.61
0.52
0.13
NOX
4.21
4.80
4.09
2.55
4.23
3.19
2.90
3.47
2.57
2.96
5.13
1.05
3.63
2.68
5.66
4.47
3.11
2.70
I .89
3.54
1.65
2.10
2.20
3.76
1 .39
2.53
4.86
3.99
3.44
1.61
NOXC
3.39
4.30
3.66
2.12
3.77
2.93
2.67
3.1 1
2.19
2.50
4.38
0.91
3.38
2.48
5.11
4.14
2.78
2.43
1 .69
3.53
1.50
1.89
2.13
3.51
1.16
2.11
4.22
3.48
2.99
1 .32
I. CO
3.57
3.10
6.10
3.57
1 .27
7.08
3.82
7.04
3.40
4.30
5.30
3.30
7.23
6.67
7.23
2.88
5.20
6.70
1 .86
1 .95
2.56
4.87
8.92
5.91
5.20
2.46
1.80
5.10
7.42
6.48
FUEL
ECON
9.5
15.1
12.7
11.7
10.7
12.4
12.5
14.6
17.6
18.1
11.9
12.2
10.7
14.8
10.8
18.6
10.5
12.3
8.2
13.1
21.7
10.2
14.5
10.3
9.8
11.7
14.0
13.3
12.6
10.6
1UO
-------
TABLE 13A, CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0041
0042
0043
0044
0045
0046
0048
0049
0051
0052
0052R
0054
0056
0057
0062
0063
0065
0066
0068
0069
0070
0071
0072
0073
0075
0076
0077
0077R
0078
0078R
YEAR
1970
1971
1971
1966
1966
1970
1 9 67
1971
1971
1970
1970
1968
1971
1968
1969
1971
1969
1969
1969
1971
1966
1972
1966
1969
1968
1968
1968
1968
1967
1967
MAKE
PLYM
VOLK
FORD
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
DATS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
TOYO
FORD
BUIC
DODG
PONT
FORD
PONT
PLYM
VOLK
CADI
CADI
VOLK
FORD
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
FLYM
CID
318
97
351
289
283
97
390
400
97
350
350
318
71
390
350
225
350
351
400
318
78
472
429
91
289
472
327
327
318
318
HC
5.76
4. 10
5.42
15.01
7.88
6.03
12.53
5.95
3.45
7.81
7.47
7.16
4.20
7.99
7.54
5.64
5.13
7.96
6.80
5.06
6.41
3.46
6.15
5.67
5.15
4.36
5.65
6.20
20.56
22.36
CO
97.5
27.9
57.2
97-8
77.4
98.8
168.0
91.7
68.3
168.0
145.1
150.9
66.6
122.0
187.6
97.0
56.6
85.1
120.5
76.5
100.3
171.6
114.3
84.9
46.3
94.5
101.6
105.5
254.3
269.8
C02
586.0
391.2
560.4
515.4
563.5
330.5
603.8
634.9
303.5
586.3
571.6
510.8
302.0
617.0
535.3
414.1
564.0
476.4
554.6
459.2
205.9
905.6
655.1
244.3
491.4
754.0
749.8
675.4
382.4
382.4
NO
3.66
3.51
4.17
2.40
5.06
1.91
2.99
5.99
1 o99
2.18
2.30
2.20
1 .95
2.67
2.22
2.74
4.79
3.99
3.49
2.72
0«84
1 .44
4.60
1 .57
3.19
4.29
2.25
2.19
0.82
0.64
N02
1 .16
0.65
1.02
0-47
1 .67
0.26
0.73
1.63
0.23
0.39
0.31
0.29
0.23
0.31
0.49
0.41
1 .20
0.90
0.54
0.34
0.05
0.08
1 .07
0.16
0.56
1.01
0.45
0.25
0.10
0.06
NOX
4.82
4.16
5.19
2.87
6.73
2.17
3.72
7.62
2.22
2.57
2.61
2.50
2.18
2.98
2.71
3.16
5.99
4.89
4.02
3.06
0.89
1.52
5.68
1 .72
3.74
5.30
2.69
2.44
0.92
0.70
NOXC
4.12
3.63
4.43
2.45
5.98
1 .74
3.19
6.42
1 .88
2.27
2.24
2.12
1 .85
2.53
2.35
2.69
5.09
4.04
3.42
2.58
0.76
1 .28
4.82
1 .51
3.14
4.48
2.29
2.02
0.78
0.58
I. CO
2.60
0.20
3.50
0.25
1 .86
3.34
0.50
2.00
2.30
4.40
3.80
3.70
2.40
2.90
2.00
1.20
1.70
7.60
2.60
5.10
2.35
1 .60
0.50
7.40
1 .99
1.60
5.00
5.70
5.50
5.10
FUEL
ECON
11.7
19.8
13.3
12.4
12.5
17.6
9.8
11.1
21.0
10.1
10.7
11.5
21.1
10.6
10.4
15.2
13.3
14.0
11.6
14.9
23.1
7.5
10.4
22.4
15.3
9.7
9.6
10.3
10.5
10.1
11*1
-------
TABLE 13A* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH«
0079
0080
0081
0082
0083
0084
0086
0087
0089
0091
0092
0094
0095
0096
0098
0100
0102
0103
0105
0107
0108
0109
0110
0111
0112
0113
0114
0116
0117
0118
YEAR
1966
1967
1972
1966
1968
1972
1970
1971
1969
1970
1971
1972
1969
1971
1972
1972
1972
1970
1970
1971
1970
1971
1972
1969
1972
1970
1972
1971
1967
1971
MAKE
PONT
VOLK
CHRY
PONT
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
MERC
FORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
MERC
BUIC
FORD
FORD
DODG
BUIC
DODG
OPEL
OLDS
BUIC
AMC
PLYM
PLYM
FORD
CHRY
FORD
CID
326
91
400
389
400
97
350
351
302
302
350
400
350
350
351
455
351
250
318
350
383
116
455
430
258
225
318
429
383
302
HC
7.96
20.49
6.29
7.36
4.87
6.73
6.44
5.26
9.48
7.70
4.34
29.35
10.25
6.07
4.43
3.81
4.57
3.52
5.51
4.50
6.30
3.17
4.57
7.86
2.89
5.87
7.67
5.29
10.87
5.36
CO
85.0
160*2
131.6
123*4
45.7
82.0
182.0
94.0
144.5
99.2
108.6
132.7
184.7
96.3
105.7
83.8
69.9
44.3
85.7
102.3
110*4
58.5
36.4
141.0
67.0
103*6
133.2
72.9
284.8
66.5
C02
525.1
214.1
603.3
537.4
647.8
307.3
471.9
621*5
490.9
537.6
613.6
659.8
492.6
597.8
570.0
822.2
588.1
413.5
509.8
516.4
568.9
333*2
648.8
431.2
430.7
340*3
523.1
698.9
542.0
554.3
NO
3.61
1.15
1.96
2.07
3.65
1.66
1.15
3.17
2.30
4.36
2.10
1.77
1.95
2.84
2.72
3.10
3.82
2.86
3.42
1.60
4.24
2.47
3.00
1.76
1.92
2.45
2.61
5.03
0.82
2.81
N02
0.91
0.12
0.30
0.21
0.75
0.17
0.06
0.60
0.39
0.49
0.19
0.48
0.19
0.48
0.56
1.15
0.88
0*42
0.65
0.14
1.14
0.29
0.80
0.22
0.19
0.36
0.52
1.39
0.06
0.50
NOX
4.52
1.28
2.25
2.28
4.40
1.83
1.20
3.77
2.69
4.85
2.29
2.25
2.14
3.31
3.28
4.25
4.11
3.27
4.07
1.74
5.39
2.76
3.80
1.98
2.11
2.81
3-13
6*43
0.88
3.31
NOXC
3.84
1.08
1.88
1.92
3.71
1.56
1.01
3.11
2.20
4.07
1.97
1.88
1.80
2.80
3.12
3.48
3.88
8.77
3.42
1.46
4.47
2.32
3.73
1.69
8.00
2.39
2.90
5.49
0.75
3.20
I. CO
5.40
10.40
1 .20
2.20
0.09
4.70
7.42
1.75
5.30
5.50
4.50
4.50
8.90
2.70
2.77
4.48
3.57
4.40
5.90
5*40
5. 50
5.90
0.94
2.10
1.70
0.94
8>10
5*20
1*80
1.77
FUEL
ECON
13.0
16.7
10.7
11.8
12.1
19.4
11.4
11.3
11.9
12.4
N.I
9.2
10.9
11.5
11.8
9.2
12.5
18.0
13.4
12.8
11.6
20.4
12.3
13.1
16.3
17.0
11.7
10.7
8.7
13.1
11*2
-------
TABLE 13A* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0119
0120
0121
0123
0124
0125
0126
0127
0128
0129
0130
0131
0132
0133
0134
0135
0136-
0136R
0137
0138
0139
0140
0141
0142
0143
0144
0145
0146
0147
0148
YEAR
1967
1972
1971
1972
1966
1968
1968
1971
1972
1967
1970
1967
1972
1968
1969
1971
1972
1972
1969
1968
1972
1966
1972
1967
1968
1972
1972
1972
1967
1966
MAKE
FORD
FORD
CHEV
FORD
AMC
CHRY
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
PONT
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
FORD
FORD
OLDS
AMC
PONT
CHEV
VOLK
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
BUIC
MERC
OLDS
CID
289
122
350
400
232
440
91
140
307
283
429
400
350
428
230
455
302
302
455
343
350
283
97
330
170
350
140
350
390
330
HC
15.57
6.70
4.61
4.34
7.99
16.75
6.43
4.64
5.09
10.38
10.38
11.99
3.07
10.52
8.99
5.28
4.83
5.13
5.75
6.67
6.48
36. 50
2.64
38.76
5.01
4.42
4.23
5.17
7.18
7il8
CO
193.7
90.1
38.8
87.6
166.0
203.4
76.9
85.8
51.3
145.5
81.8
155.7
47.2
193.4
104.6
98.9
91.2
95.9
165.5
1 12.6
133.6
142.7
30.2
214.9
97.9
78.7
67.6
85.8
114.9
86.0
C02
371.7
307.2
674.1
719.8
376.0
587.0
252.6
338.4
650.8
416.4
681.4
482.3
542.2
621.9
318.4
690.7
587.9
613.0
765.4
421 .2
629.1
350.0
385.1
457.9
371.9
619.9
408.2
688.9
496.2
532.1
NO
1 .20
1 .58
3.60
5.75
1 .31
2.06
1 .96
2.18
3.14
1 .58
3.46
3.28
1 .72
4.42
1.38
3.51
2.39
2.37
2.07
1 .54
1.96
1.31
5.15
1 .03
0.98
2.07
0.78
3.40
2.78
2.54
N02
0.11
0.11
0.65
1 .89
0.24
0.20
0.17
0-30
0.73
0.25
0.60
0.68
0.19
0.43
0.19
0.66
0.21
0.41
0.30
0.17
0.18
0*21
1 .77
0.11
0.10
0.34
0.07
0.57
0.39
0-61
NOX
1.31
1 .69
4.25
7.64
1 .55
2.26
2.13
2.48
3.87
1 .83
4.06
3.96
1 .91
4.85
1.57
4.17
2.60
2-79
2.37
1 .71
2.14
1.53
6.92
1.14
1.08
2.41
0.86
3.97
3.16
3.15
NCXC
1 .20
1 .58
3.51
6.37
1 .31
1 .90
1 .76
2.28
3.64
1.48
3.33
3.07
1 .77
3.88
1 .25
3.34
2.01
2.31
1.89
1 .54
1.71
1 .22
5.53
0.91
0.86
2.17
0.78
3.22
2.52
2.84
I. CO
8.92
1.40
0.60
7.40
7.23
3.80
1 .30
6.86
0.29
6.10
3.20
7.40
1.52
9.47
6.40
5.20
4.40
4.61
5.10
1 .35
5.40
1.10
3.80
5.30
1.01
0.50
0.94
1 .70
5iOO
0«87
FUEL
ECON
12.2
18.9
11.8
10.2
13.4
9.2
22.5
18.2
11.9
13.1
10.5
11.6
14.2
9.3
17.4
10.3
11.9
11.3
8.5
14.3
10.3
12.9
20.1
9.7
16.4
11.7
16.8
10.6
12.7
12.9
1U3
-------
TABLE ,13A* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH(!>
0149
0150
0151
0152
C152R
0153
0154
0155
0156
0157
0158
0159
0160
0160R
0161
0163
0163R
0164
0165
0166
0166R
0167
0168
0169
0170
0171
0172
0173
0174
0175
YEAR
1971
1970
1968
1972
1972
1968
1972
1968
1969
1967
1970
1972
1971
1971
1970
1970
1970
1968
1972
1971
1971
1971
1969
1972
1968
1971
1968
1966
1969
1970
MAKE
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
FORD
DODG
OLDS
MERC
PONT
PONT
FORD
PLYM
PLYM
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
CHEV
DODG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
DODG
FORD
CID
170
400
307
360
360
289
360
350
390
326
400
351
198
198
455
250
250
302
350
383
383
98
307
454
318
351
307
200
383
302
HC
7.33
7.55
6.50
6.19
6.88
5.47
6. 15
5.44
7.88
9.37
7.18
6.35
12.85
12.53
6.68
4.04
4.12
4.36
5.56
11.48
11.62
4.79
6.66
2.44
10.81
5.07
26.14
6» 99
5.72
5.32
CO
85.8
122.5
64«8
127.5
140.7
100.3
157.9
76«8
80.5
129.2
95.7
126o9
162.0
168»i
135.7
69.8
65.6
63.3
120.0
206.5
200.6
61.7
79.9
60.4
174.2
43o4
422 » 4
61.5
111°6
50.3
C02
319.4
546.4
549.6
643.2
629.6
485.8
519.3
565.1
633.1
493.9
740.1
745.0
306.0
314.5
661.4
432.3
427.7
652.5
619.0
591.3
609.3
247.2
420.2
793.3
512.9
572.2
425*6
357.0
676.0
459.5
NO
1 .68
2.55
4.45
5.16
4.83
2.42
3.14
3.14
5.17
1.52
5.26
2.93
1.39
1.30
2.99
3.08
3.34
2.09
2.08
1.36
1 .32
2.25
2.95
2.29
1.85
4.15
0>62
2.70
2.98
2.57
N02
0.34
0.88
1.07
5.55
3.36
0.42
0.63
0.57
2.55
0.19
1.87
0.63
0.17
0.17
0.50
0.79
0.60
0.33
0.29
0.14
0.10
0.30
0.38
0.27
0.41
1.12
0.06
1.07
0.41
0.50
NOX
2.02
3.43
5.52
6.70
7.19
2.84
3.76
3.71
7.73
1.71
7.1 3
3.56
1 .56
1.47
3.49
3.87
3.94
2.42
2.36
1.50
1 .42
2.56
3.33
2.56
2.26
5.28
0.68
3.77
3.39
3.06
NOXC
1 .60
3.24
4.35
5.39
5.75
2.27
3.03
2.96
6.30
1 .44
6.51
3.40
1 .27
1 .23
2.83
3.11
3.20
2.30
2.27
1.54
1.21
2.15
2.79
2.11
1 .86
4.28
0.57
3.15
2.74
2.60
I. CO
6.43
4.08
0.16
4.80
4.80
6.20
7.70
5.90
0.14
0.79
5.62
0.29
10.00
9.00
9.80
6.80
8.10
2.25
8.64
6.65
6.70
6.80
2.60
5.30
1.20
3.30
6.30
3.50
3.50
0.19
FUEL
ECON
18.6
11.6
13.2
10.3
10.1
13.4
11.3
12.6
11.3
12.2
9.7
9.2
14.8
14.3
9.9
16.0
16.3
13.3
10.8
9.3
9.2
24.7
15.7
9.9
10.8
13.5
7.6
18.7
10.2
16.0
-------
TABLE 13A* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0176
0176R
0177
0178
0179
0180
0181
0182
0183
0184
0185
0186
0187
0188
0189
0190
0191
0192
0193
0194
0195
0196
0197
0197R
0198
0199
0200
0201
0202
0203
YEAR
1969
1969
1971
1972
1970
1967
1968
1967
1967
1966
1967
1972
1967
1972
1971
1967
1966
1966
1971
1969
1972
1971
1972
1972
1972
1969
1966
1967
1970
1972
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
DATS
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
AMC
PLYM
BUIC
BUIC
CHEV
PONT
LING
CHEV
DODG
MERC
OLDS
PLYM
TOYG
PONT
PLYM
PLYM.,
DODG
FORD
CHEV
DODG
AMC
CHEV
CID
307
307
350
97
440
283
396
230
232
225
300
455
283
400
460
283
383
390
455
225
97
455
360
360
225
200
250
225
390
350
HC
4.60
4.28
9.33
4.18
4.83
38.08
6.05
7.87
5.52
7.18
10.34
3.06
12.47
4.92
6.32
20.70
7.04
18.09
5.35
3.31
4.99
5.43
7.21
6.58
, 4.93
5.67
12.02
12.79
6.31
4.71
CO
50.2
50.0
163.6
29.9
81 .6
178.0
120.4
142.3
95.2
206.9
143.5
59.7
216.3
60.9
95.8
152.6
92.7
239.4
52.5
45.7
80.1
96.9
106.8
108.4
100.1
80.8
161.2
232.5
79.1
105.7
C02
426.4
435.2
684.5
321 .2
695.7
396.3
554.9
338.2
312.5
310.1
407.5
722.8
455.9
661.4
636.6
419.0
656.7
533.8
718.4
355.4
293.7
533.8
595.4
603.6
380.8
351.3
281.1
284.5
506.3
553.1
NO
2.57
2.45
1 .72
2.11
4.16
1.29
1 .94
1.63
1.77
0.39
1.78
4.91
0.84
2.34
3.80
1.58
1.74
1 .27
3.19
4.30
1 .53
1 .28
3.56
3.39
2.72
2.01
0.98
0.28
2.93
2.58
N02
0.36
0.92
0.15
0.30
0.89
0.15
0.18
0.84
0.55
0.04
0.20
1 .53
0.05
0.91
1 .06
0.23
0.20
0.14
0.98
1 .28
0*22
0*14
1.09
0.67
0.48
0.19
0.12
0.05
0.62
0.39
NGX
2.93
3.37
1 .86
2.41
5.05
1 .44
2.11
2*48
2.31
0.43
1.98
6.44
0.89
3.25
4.86
1.81
1.94
1 .41
4.17
5.58
1 .75
1.42
4.65
4.06
3.20
2.20
1.10
0.32
3.55
2.97
NOXC
2.49
2.76
1.75
2.03
4.22
1.20
1 .77
2.07
1 .93
0.36
1.68
6.20
0.97
3.06
4.89
1 .89
1.97
1.39
4.20
5.53
1.75
1.39
4.33
3.77
3.02
1 .93
1.15
0.35
3.19
2.63
I. CO
2.20
0.43
5.72
5.40
3.50
7.50
0.25
7.60
6.00
5.30
7.20
0.12
5.90
2.84
6.23
6.39
0.50
9.05
1.89
7.52
2.84
5.59
2.16
2.20
6.79
7.12
5.92
7.20
3.56
7.36
FUEL
ECON
17.1
16.8
9.1
23.3
10.6
11.1
11.6
15.1
18.5
13.5
13.3
10.7
10.6
11.5
11.0
12.2
10.8
9.2
10.9
20.3
20.4
12.6
11.3
11.1
16.0
17.9
15.5
12.9
13.6
12.1
1U5
-------
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0301
0302
0303
0304
0305
0306
0307
0308
0309
0310
0311
0312
0313
0314
0315
0316
0317
0318
0319
0320
0322
0323
0324
0325
0326
0327
0328
0329
0330
0330R
YEAR
1966
1972
1970
1970
1971
1966
1971
1972
1971
1971
1968
1972
1966
1972
1966
1970
1972
1969
1972
1966
1971
1968
1966
1969
1972
1971
1971
1969
1969
1969
MAKE
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
OLDS
CHEV
VOLK
AMC
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CADI
PONT
CADI
TOYO
FORD
OLDS
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
CID
390
350
350
455
350
283
429
350
400
97
290
400
283
400
389
97
455
307
350
194
350
472
326
472
120
351
455
200
350
350
HC
8.17
3.18
4.77
13.28
3.22
9.50
5.33
3.52
2.52
2.85
4.16
2.71
9.73
29.22
6.27
4.94
2.17
3.57
2.64
4.74
4.27
3.97
7.84
5.42
2.08
5o22
4.06
3.28
7.32
6.51
CO
72.1
71»3
147.7
868.9
61.1
118.2
101.9
59.5
37.7
46»3
63.6
26.6
135ol
89.9
67«8
53.1
24.5
53.5
32.7
67.1
67.4
82.5
76.7
83.1
29ol
71.0
64°6
30«4
138 = 6
103°4
C02
581.1
856.4
632.6
662.9
554.8
464.8
571.9
643.3
656.3
312.1
539.2
717.6
459.7
588.9
552.4
320.2
815.5
519.6
642.4
337.9
626*0
694.5
472.4
705.4
395.2
597.2
717.7
477.9
482.8
508.2
NO
3.29
2.97
2.07
1.64
4.92
1.86
1.96
3.59
3.47
1.93
2.19
4.29
3.53
4.27
3.79
2*49
5.51
4.10
2.88
2.52
4.99
4.15
4.40
4.66
3.07
3*56
4.89
3.85
2.08
3.05
N02
1.75
UOO
0.32
0.46
0.59
0«72
0.51
1 .42
1 .22
0.34
2.56
0.86
0.85
Io50
1.96
0.59
2.60
1.60
0.84
0.54
1.67
1.36
1.76
2.99
0.8!
0.69
S.75
2.76
0»30
0.85
NOX
5.04
3.97
2.39
2.09
5.51
2.58
2.46
5.01
4.69
2.28
4.75
5.15
4.37
5.76
5.75
3.08
8.11
5.71
3.71
3.06
6.65
5.52
6.15
7.65
3e88
4.25
7«63
5.61
2.37
3.90
NOXC
4.45
3.51
2.08
1.82
4.75
2.35
2.18
4.53
4.32
2.12
4.05
4.50
3.69
4.91
5.12
2.70
7.35
5.37
3.43
2.85
5.96
5.03
5.83
7.35
3.65
4.08
7.28
5.26
2.20
3.45
I. CO
3.93
0.12
7.89
7.62
0.10
2.62
5.40
0.41
1.45
1 .53
8.73
0.41
6.86
2.00
1.60
4.70
0.93
1.00
1.37
0.74
1.06
0.56
2.40
0.65
3.80
2.00
5.00
0.59
2.29
4.90
FUEL
ECON
12.3
9.1
10.1
9.1
13.4
13.0
11.8
11.9
12.3
22.5
13.6
11.6
12.6
10.8
13.1
21.2
10.3
14.4
12.6
19.4
11.9
10.6
14.4
10.4
19.8
12.2
10.7
16.6
12.3
12.8
-------
TABLE 13A* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0331
0331R
0332
0333
0334
0335
0336
0337
0338
0339
0341
0342
0343
0344
0346
0347
0348
0350
0351
0353
0354
0355
0356
0357
0358
0359
0360
0361
0362
0363
YEAR
1971
1971
1966
1972
1970
1967
1971
1970
1969
1971
1972
1969
1970
1971
1971
1969
1967
1972
1968
1970
1972
1971
1972
1967
1972
1972
1968
1972
1968
1972
MAKE
BUIC
BUIC
AMC
CADI
CHRY
VOLK
TOYO
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
FORD
PLYM
PONT
PONT
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
FORD
OLDS
MERC
CHEV
AMC
CID
455
455
232
472
440
91
71
351
307
350
455
455
307
97
318
350
400
351
396
350
360
350
318
318
400
302
350
400 '
307
258
HC
3.16
3.40
14.14
1.32
4.40
3.97
5.97
34.46
3.74
4.03
1.55
4.13
5.60
2.70
2.56
4.76
8.26
2.79
4.76
6.48
4.27
4.16
3.45
4.72
2.12
3.28
4.83
2.18
6.58
0.69
CO
47.6
53.9
112.9
20.0
61.1
60.7
24.5
138.4
49.7
1 16.6
10.4
89.9
85.8
23.4
33.9
85.0
76.3
39.8
91.2
135.6
86.6
30.4
53.5
49.5
18.9
58.6
77.2
21.8
59.0
8.6
C02
805.7
761.5
370.6
861.5
700.5
276.4
347.5
451.6
500.7
659.4
859.2
626.3
411.0
319.2
591.2
531.6
506.6
667.5
523.3
517.1
627.3
625.7
531.8
476.1
667.8
646.1
573.8
737.6
493.6
413.1
NO
4.96
4.44
1.62
1 .76
3.69
2.53
3.40
3.61
3.64
3.09
4.48
4.56
2.86
3.12
4.15
5.31
5.82
3.76
2.91
2.24
5.45
4.67
5.42
4.40
2.81
2.29
2.87
5.28
4.47
1.14
N02
2.44
1.63
0.40
2.09
1.10
0.94
0.86
1 .29
1.26
2.62
5.13
2.22
0.58
0.74
1.38
2.05
2.68
0.95
0.50
0.43
2.78
1.61
1.90
1.68
0.99
0°46
0.44
2.86
2.35
0.26
NOX
7.41
6.07
2.02
3.85
4.79
3.46
4.28
4.90
4.89
5.71
9.61
6.79
3.44
3.86
5.53
7.36
8.51
4.71
3.41
2.67
8.23
6.28
7.31
6.07
3.80
2.75
3.31
8.14
6.82
1.39
NOXC
6.98
5.56
1.88
3.59
4.53
2.95
4.54
4.37
4.34
5.09
8.96
6.28
3.16
3.56
5.09
6.43
7.53
3.88
3.02
2.20
7.51
5.95
6.83
5.59
3.60
2.61
3.08
7.38
6.37
1.33
I. CO
2.29
3.30
1.45
0.70
1.86
1 .63
2.07
4.00
1.95
5.00
0.1 1
1.73
4.40
3.64
0.79
1.60
7.60
3.15
2.10
3.54
8.05
1.95
4.91
1.19
0.46
2.14
4.13
0.10
6.09
0.17
FUEL
ECON
10.0
10.3
15.0
9.9
11.0
23 1
L. J • 1
21 9
L. 1 • J
11.4
15 0
\ +J i \J
10.4
10 1
1 \J • I
1 1 4
1 1 > T^
15 7
\ •J • 1
24 3
C-T^ • -J
13.6
13.0
13.6
12.0
13.0
11.8
11.4
12.9
14.2
15.6
12.6
11.9
12.5
11.4
14.6
20.7
1U7
-------
TABLE 13A» CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0364
0365
0366
0367
C368
0369
0370
0371
0372
0374
0375
0376
0377
0378
0379
0380
0381
0382
0383
0384
0385
0385R
0386
0387
0388
0389
0390
0391
0392
0393
YEAR
1969
1972
1972
1972
1972
1971
1968
1969
1966
1968
1970
1972
1967
1969
1972
1967
1967
1968
1972
1970
1968
1968
1966
1969
1966
1971
1969
1971
1972
1971
MAKE
PLYM
CHRY
FORD
FCRD
DCDG
DCDG
DODG
FORD
OLDS
FORD
MERC
DATS
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
MERC
MERC
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
DODG
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CID
318
400
122
351
225
225
318
302
330
289
429
97
283
91
302
327
283
307
140
400
302
302
200
350
78
383
350
302
97
307
HC
5.89
5.93
3.61
3.42
3.49
3.99
4.41
4.69
11.48
5.81
6.70
2.09
8.22
4.70
3.42
7.19
15.37
10.34
3.80
4.53
3.68
4.18
12.55
7.96
6.10
10.50
4.11
3.35
3.88
4.74
CO
86.3
107.0
35.9
50.5
71.8
68.3
116.7
51.6
139.0
68.3
79.7
23.2
98.7
46.6
32.5
106.0
123.9
108.3
54.0
68.3
13.6
13.3
153.6
83.9
76.3
275.6
76o6
40.4
57.7
90 »6
C02
538.4
713.6
355.9
660*1
452.9
434.5
464.5
523.9
537.7
506.0
784.4
350.9
562.5
327.0
606.0
604.5
504.3
525.9
457.6
723.4
633.3
613.3
416.3
610.3
335.2
653.6
556.1
664.8
393.0
558.2
NO
3.83
3.51
2.83
4.05
3.64
3.66
2.05
5.18
3.40
2.30
6.94
2.96
3.50
3.03
2.66
2.40
2.16
2.29
2.19
3.83
3.35
3.17
0.92
2.92
2.13
0.94
2.02
2.05
2.19
3.59
N02
1.79
1.22
0.50
0.95
1.35
1.05
0.20
2.60
0.64
0.92
2.40
0.78
1.23
0.76
0.43
0.54
0.54
0.51
0.36
1.10
0.99
0.81
0.07
0»86
0.27
0°26
0.61
0.57
0.35
1.12
NOX
5.62
4.73
3.32
5.01
4.98
4.71
2.25
7.79
4.04
3.22
9.35
3.74
4.73
3.79
3.09
2.93
2.70
2.80
2.54
4.93
4.34
3.97
0.98
3.78
2.40
1.20
2.64
8o62
2.54
4.71
NOXC
5.77
4.70
3.31
5.18
5.19
4.95
2. 20
7.61
3.87
2.88
8.44
3.62
4.68
3o86
3.08
2.79
2.65
2.82
2.55
5.05
4.80
4.26
1.07
4.01
2.52
1.27
2.85
2.71
2.72
5.13
I. CO
2.68
5.30
5.11
3.04
6.09
3.64
0.33
4.13
7.50
3.23
0*28
5.30
4.42
4.81
2.06
6.86
3.05
7.50
1.40
5.50
0.39
1 .20
1.94
9.10
0.36
6.86
5.21
2.10
3.60
5.79
FUEL
ECON'
12.8
9.9
20.9
11.8
15.4
16.0
13.4
14.3
11.2
14.0
9.5
22.5
11.9
21.4
13.3
11.2
11.9
12.2
16.0
10.5
13.3
13.7
12.7
11/6
18.7
7.9
12.9
12.0
17.9
12.4
1U8
-------
TABLE 13A, CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHtf
0393R
0394
0395
0396
0397
0397R
0398
0399
0400
0401
0401R
0402
0403
0404
0405
0405R
0406
0407
0408
0409
0410
0412
0413
0414
0414R
0415
0416
0417
0418
0419
YEAR MAKE
1971 CHEV
1967 AMC
1968 CHEV
1971 OLDS
1967 BUIC
1967 BUIC
1972 BUIC
1968 FORD
1972 CHEV
1970 FORD
1970 FORD
1971 CHEV
1970 PLYM
1970 FORD
1970 OLDS
1970 OLDS
1969 PONT
1966 BUIC
1970 FORD
1971 MERC
1967 OLDS
1968 BUIC
1967 FORD
1966 CADI
1966 CADI
1969 FORD
1971 FORD
1969 PLYM
1969 FORD
1967 PONT
CID
307
232
327
350
300
300
350
390
350
302
302
402
318
200
350
350
400
340
250
351
330
430
289
429
429
302
351
225
351
326
HC
4.16
3.44
30.31
4.67
8.08
7.96
2.84
5.11
3.37
3.16
4.08
3.42
2.70
4.13
3.50
3.92
4.10
13.99
5.60
3.46
8.16
5.79
6.33
5.61
5.81
5.55
5.23
3.17
5.20
11.03
CO
73.7
43.6
95.4
57.9
150.4
160.2
37.2
61.2
71.0
69.7
70.7
65.6
30.3
21.1
43.3
43.5
75.1
208.0
138.6
63.5
105.6
75.8
100.4
100.8
102.7
46.8
80.5
39.7
54.0
82.0
C02
514.9
351.4
516.1
740.6
537.1
534.9
746.1
712.8
678.2
548.9
548.8
709.1
526.5
338.6
557.2
523.8
643.4
429.7
470.3
652.8
520.7
640.6
381.5
664.7
709.3
466.1
649.2
512.0
496.9
447.7
NO
3.60
3.60
2.15
4.99
2.40
2.46
3.37
4.88
2.59
2.34
3.61
2.93
3.79
3.18
2.48
3.02
2.20
0.67
1.23
2.84
2.32
5.17
1.18
2.81
3.14
5.45
6.03
4.31
3.86
3.68
N02
0.61
1.21
0.56
2.29
0.46
0.32
0.52
2.34
0.62
0.67
1.04
0.85
1.18
0.99
0.66
0.61
0.57
0.08
0.12
0.54
0»25
1.70
0.29
0.64
0.82
2.07
2.21
1.17
1.18
0.91
NOX
4.21
4.80
2.71
7.28
2.86
2.78
3.89
7.22
3*21
3.01
4.65
3.78
4.97
4.17
3.14
3.63
2.77
0.74
1.35
3.39
2.57
6.87
1.46
3.45
3.96
7.52
8.24
5.48
5.04
4.60
NOXC
4.33
5.24
2.56
7.36
2.91
3.04
4.14
7.43
3.42
3.23
4.42
3.95
5.19
4.22
3.12
3.45
2.92
0.83
1.53
3.84
2.76
6.79
1.40
3.34
3.71
7.22
7.60
4.85
4.58
4.15
I. CO
5.21
5.11
2.00
3.20
6.50
6.40
2.40
1.13
7.31
3.10
2.51
6.55
1.73
0*66
3.71
3.93
1.82
5.70
1.14
3.00
0.63
3.60
0.27
2.51
2.35
4.32
5.30
3.70
5.79
5.21
FUEL
ECON
13.7
20.6
11.6
10.5
11.1
10.9
10.9
10.8
11.1
13.3
13.1
10.8
15.2
23.1
13.9
14.6
-11.5
11.1
12.6
11.6
12.5
11.4
15.9
10.6
9.9
15.9
11.2
15.2
14.8
14.5
-------
TABLE 13A, CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0420
0421
0422
0423
0424
0425
0426
0427
0428
0428R
0429
0430
0431
0432
0434
0435
0436
0437
0437R
0438
0439
0440
0441
0442
0443
0444
0445
0446
0447
0448
YEAR
1970
1972
1966
1971
1969
1969
1971
1968
1972
1972
1968
1966
1970
1968
1969
1971
1972
1972
1972
1970
1966
1967
1966
1968
1967
1970
1971
1967
1967
1970
MAKE
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
PONT
BUIC
FORD
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
FORD
FORD
BUIC
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
BUIC
BUIC
PONT
MERC
DODG
CHEV
FORD
FORD
PLYM
FORD
FORD
CHRY
AMC
CID
351
307
225
455
430
390
350
400
350
350
289
289
350
383
230
140
350
455
455
350
390
225
283
200
289
225
200
390
383
304
HC
4.37
3.58
4.49
2.74
6.76
3.99
4.27
5.38
4.64
4.68
3.74
15.34
4.74
14..67
5.38
3.94
4.15
2.16
2.28
2.35
8.15
3.59
13.65
4.78
8.86
4.38
2e23
7.03
5.84
4.44
CO
61.2
11.2
61.2
27 c 3
S18-3
25.6
117.6
62.8
27.5
24.3
36.8
150.6
87.1
155*2
58.8
53.1
44.5
19.1
24.6
35.4
166.7
64.6
139.0
20.2
80.5
52.0
i^o8
192.1
88«2
39.8
C02
527.5
612.4
393.0
825.1
545.1
621.1
907.5
534.0
682.6
668.8
490.3
375.1
548*8
529.0
475.7
280.8
485.6
754.4
766.1
623.7
662.7
375.1
411.5
443.6
471.8
351.0
395.4
454.3
442.3
549.7
NO
5.75
3.54
2.91
4.81
4.73
5.75
2.68
4.78
3.10
2.92
4.82
1.34
2.87
2.72
3.81
1.38
2.06
4.33
4.65
2.39
2.00
3.08
2.21
3.44
2.30
2.38
2.41
0.85
2.58
3*58
N02
1.71
0>92
0.53
S.06
i°65
2.87
0.49
0.34
0.34
0.37
0*42
0.14
0.38
Oo30
1.05
0.14
0.38
2o03
1.59
0.37
0.35
0.74
0.41
1.29
0.45
0 = 49
0°«8
0.06
0.64
0.76
NOX
7.46
4.46
3.44
6.87
6.37
8.63
3.17
5.12
3.43
3.29
5.24
1.48
3.25
3 = 02
«o87
1.52
2.43
6.36
6.85
2.75
2.35
3.82
2.62
4.73
2.75
2*86
2*90
0.90
3.23
4o33
NOXC
6.76
4.24
3.30
6.79
6.16
8.28
3.07
5.03
3.45
3.80
5.38
1.63
3.59
3°37
5.63
1.60
2.76
6.94
7.16
2.97
2.59
4.19
3.13
5.45
3.12
3.18
3.19
1.00
3.56
4.88
I. CO
2.91
0.12
0.14
0.18
6.55
0.08
7.16
3.20
0.19
0.55
5.11
0.84
3.00
3.10
0.14
7.62
5.64
1.82
1.40
2.24
2.62
4.60
7.31
0.65
2.66
5.40
0*41
4.13
3.23
1.82
FUEL
ECON
13.9
13.8
17.6
10.1
11.8
13.2
8.0
13.7
12.0
12.3
15.8
13.4
12.7
10.8
15.2
23.6
15.6
11.2
10.9
12.9
9.3
18.2
13.2
18.1
14.2
19.9
20.8
11.4
14.8
14.2
150
-------
TABLE 13A* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0449
0450
0451
0452
0453
0454
0455
0456
0457
0458
0459
0460
0461
0462
0463
0464
0465
0466
0467
0468
0469
0470
0471
0472
0473
0474
0475
0476
0477
0478
YEAR
1970
1969
1971
1970
1968
1971
1972
1970
1970
1967
1968
1966
1971
1969
1969
1972
1971
1972
1971
1968
1970
1972
1968
1967
1970
1968
1972
1970
1970
1967
MAKE
BUIC
BUIC
VOLK
VOLK
PONT
PLYM
FORD
DODG
TOYO
CHEV
PLYM
DODG
DATS
DCDG
MERC
PLYM
LINC
VOLK
OPEL
CHEV
DODG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
CID
455
350
97
97
350
198
429
318
71
283
318
363
97
383
429
360
460
103
116
250
383
360
429
194
351
91
402
454
250
289
HC
7.24
8.41
4.28
3.06
7.40
4.36
3.79
3.43
2.39
40.69
4.70
11.77
2.41
6.61
8.99
5.58
4.71
3.58
,3.63
5.92
9.17
6.76
10.03
8.55
4.79
22.58
2.02
14.25
6.36
7.46
CO
96.4
156.2
55.7
39.0
123.8
47.1
. 56.4
22.0
19.7
143.2
51.3
339.4
8.6
92.9
117.1
85.1
87.6
22.6
53.3
49.4
29.6
27.7
247.3
102.0
68.7
155.7
76.8
355.5
30.4
103.1
C02
672.1
486.5
334.1
339.1
460.2
409.8
689.7
544.3
338.0
428.5
511.9
564.5
280.1
508.1
737.0
629.5
702.1.
361.1
399.5
413.1
740.9
586.5
658.4
399.8
541.1
242.9
648.5
504.2
448.2
509.6
NO
3.64
3.34
2.51
3.15
1.81
4.46
4.46
4.88,
4.48
2.82
2.76
0.47
2.49
2.52
1.95
4.05
4.15
3.80
3.09
2.01
1.51
5.08
1.10
2.25
3.82
0.92
5.08
0.54
4.49
3.54
N02
0.82
0.68
0.32
0.57
0.20
1 .04
1 .88
1 .45
1.47
0.64
0.46
0.02
0.51
0.29
0.27
1.18
0.76
0.40
0.62
0.08
0.15
1.60
Oo09
0.28
0.74
0.14
2.62
0.05
1.80
1.05
NOX
4.46
4.02
2.83
3.71
2.01
5.49
6.35
6.33
5.95
3.46
3.22
0.49
3.00
2.80
2.22
5.23
4.92
4.20
3.71
2.09
1.66
6.68
1.20
2.53
4.57
1.06
7.70
0.59
6.29
4.59
NGXC
5.40
4.86
3.25
3.62
1.90
4.87
5.38
5.46
5.09
2.94
3.61
0.57
3.43
3.18
2.57
6.17
5.81
4.96
4.71
2.77
1 .85
7.46
1 .41
3.12
5.50
1.32
7.05
0*56
5.95
4.21
I. CO
3.50
8.05
8.28
1 .60
3.03
5.40
3.20
0.30
1.50
6.40
0.60
3.60
0.15
3.20
7.10
3.90
6.40
0.31
6.55
0.89
0.18
2.00
4.40
2.90
4.60
7.10
0.60
5.30
0.60
0.60
FUEL
ECON
10.5
11.7
20.4
21.6
13.1
17.8
11.2
15.1
23.6
11.3
14.6
7.8
29.5
13.1
9.3
11.4
10.4
21.8
17.9
17.4
10.9
13.6
18.2
15.1
13.4
15.9
11.4
8.0
17.2
12.8
151
-------
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0501
0502
0503
0504
0505
0506
0507
0508
0509
0510
0511
0512
0513
0514
0515
0516
0517
0518
0519
0520
0521
0522
0523
0524
0525
0526
0527
0528
0529
0530
YEAR
1971
1972
1972
1972
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1970
1971
1970
1970
1970
1972
1970
1969
1972
1967
1968
1971
1971
1969
1969
1970
1966
1967
1972
MAKE
FORD
AMC
BUIC
FORD
FORD
DODG
FORD
FORD
VOLK
OLDS
FORD
OLDS
PONT
MERC
PONT
PLYM
CHEV
FORD
FORD
BUIC
VOLK
FORD
LINC
CHEV
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
CID
351
258
455
351
302
225
351
200
97
455
351
350
455
429
400
318
400
351
302
455
91
200
460
350
350
390
350
200
400
103
HC
5«44
3.67
2.37
5.93
3.15
3.20
3.58
2.66
3.84
1.76
2.20
4.03
3.40
4.21
4o26
4.84
3.00
4.53
4.03
2.09
9.58
2.23
2.92
2.92
5.59
4.51
3.50
24.94
6.30
2.39
CO
65.6
52.7
32.5
97.7
52.1
70.2
51.0
23.1
43.0
9.5
16.6
80.9
73»3
39.4
51.1
6606
68.8
95.6
55.6
28.1
73.7
42.2
48.5
40.1
87.4
92.4
43.0
46*0
82.5
17.5
C02
487.5
445.4
817.8
730.5
587.9
379.6
553.3
379.7
337.9
753.2
663.9
497.9
622.3
724.9
558.2
509.8
729.7
523.1
430.9
750.2
176.6
373.7
732.5
559.1
506.4
519.2
469.2
356.7
542.7
378.2
NO
3.50
3.64
3.84
3.20
2.74
3.00
4.17
3.41
2.28
3.95
4.21
3.47
3.61
6.39
3.60
4.61
3.54
3.68
4.14
5.11
0.80
2.61
3.97
2.94
3.12
3.20
4.28
3.78
3.55
2.30
N02
1.84
1.33
1«78
1°18
Oo85
0.62
1.82
2.13
1.27
1.70
1.47
0.90
1.02
2.55
1.46
2.77
1.26
1.03
1.81
2.74
0.08
0.51
1.49
1.79
0.77
Oo81
1.61
1.32
1.62
0*70
NCX
5.34
4.97
5.62
4.38
3.60
3.62
5.99
5.54
3.55
5.66
5.68
4.37
4.63
8.94
5.06
7.39
4.80
4.71
5.95
7.85
0.88
3.12
5.46
4.73
3*89
4.02
5.89
5.10
5.17
3.01
NOXC
4.88
4.61
5.54
4.13
3.25
3.27
5.16
4.83
3.11
4.90
4.89
3.76
4.00
7.64
4.21
6.12
3.91
3.90
4.82
6.33
0.72
2.81
4.98
4.29
3*61
3.71
5.48
4.71
4.78
2.76
I. CO
6.95
5.60
1.88
3.40
3.60
5.90
4.12
1.97
0.96
0.22
0.26
4.32
6.89
3.62
3.48
7.00
5.45
5*22
5.40
2.40
5.40
3.83
3.01
2.83
5.52
5.37
3.74
5.38
6.80
0.12
FUEL
ECON
14.6
16.4
10.1
9.8
13.1
17.7
13.8
20.9
21.3
11.5
12.7
13.9
11.9
11.1
13.6
14.1
10.5
12.9
16.7
11.1
27.5
19.9
10.9
14.1
13.4
13.1
16.2
17.5
12.8
21.5
152
-------
TABLE 13A* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0531
0532
0533
0534
3535
0536
0537
0538
0539
0540
0541
0542
0543.
0544
0545
0546
0547
0548
0549
0550
0551 <
0552
0553
0554
0555
0556
0557
0558
0559
0560
YEAR
1970
1968
1969
1969
1966
1972
1972
1972
1971
1972
1969
1972
1966
1968
1967
1967
1971
1972
1969
1972
1971
1972
1971
1971
1968
1970
1971
1970
1970
1972
MAKE
BUIC
PLYM
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
FORD
BUIC
DGDG
CHEV
BUIC
VOLK
PONT
MERC
CHEV
PLYM
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
CHRY
BUIC
TOYO
PLYM
OPEL
OLDS
BUIC
VOLK
CHEV
CHRY
PLYM
CID
350
273
350
302
194
318
302
350
383
307
430
97
389
302
283
318
350
350
327
400
350
120
198
116
350
455
97
350
440
360
HC
5.34
3.68
3.80
4.96
4.24
2.89
2.86
3.03
6.05
2.77
5.78
3.14
5.55
3.02
9.73
6.81
2.76
3.32
15.25
5ol6
6.06
1.84
3.18
1.73
5.51
6.30
3.21
,4.20
4.06
5.28
CO
84.3
46.3
71.7
62.8
75.1
40.4
5.3
55.9
124.4
25.5
93.5
38.7
59.2
24.5
125.5
133.1
39.1
33.8
255.0
108.4
78.5
20.0
66.9
41.9
87.1
139.0
40>6
68.6
26.8
112.4
CG2
517.3
452.5
527.4
520.5
369.6
502.5
486.3
638.5
546.9
575.0
547.1
373.1
543.0
418.8
447.8
448.9
566.7
662.2
423.9
595.4
570.2
375.3
342.9
406.3
546.4
555.0
287.5
497.7
616.4
575.4
NO
3.32
4.44
4.65
5.25
1.83
3.87
2.99
3.46
2.93
2.92
4.67
2.37
3.03
3.03
2.02
1.94
3.80
3.21
0.64
3.17
1.89
2.41
2.42
1.24
2.33
2.83
1.92
3.08
4.71
4.84
N02
0.99
1.32
1.95
2.07
0.26
1.13
1.02
1.03
0.76
0.66
1.57
0.56
0.61
1.14
0.49
0.42
0.85
0.83
0.02
0.92
0.33
0.50
0.55
0.06
0.30
0.44
0.14
0.73
0.49
2.01
NOX
4.31
5.76
6.60
7.32
2.09
5.00
4.02
4.49
3.69
3.57
6.24
2.93
3.64
4.17
2.51
2.36
4.65
4.04
0.66
4.08
2.22
2.91
2.97
1.30
2.62
3.27
2.06
3.82
5.21
6.84
NOXC
3.98
5.49
6.17
6.74
1.95
4.76
3.94
4.31
3.63
3>51
6.04
2.84
3.43
3.93
2.36
2.24
4.38
3.81
0.62
3.85
2.20
2.97
2.96
1.26
2.68
3.31
2.06
3.11
4.97
6.53
I. CO
1 .50
1.05
7.23
4.92
4.00
3.50
1.31
2.50
7.23
2.48
7.23
2.46
0.19
1.40
5.85
4.42
2.12
3.77
6.00
7.43
5.32
1.78
3.82
7.06
5.22
5.08
1.11
3.82
0.15
6.50
FULL
ECON
13.3
16.5
13.6
14.0
17.7
15.4
17.6
12.1
11.7
14.2
12.5
20.0
13.6
19.0
13.1
13.1
13.9
12.2
10.2
11.3
12.5
21.5
19.4
18.6
12.7
11.2
24.6
14.3
13.2
11.5
153
-------
TABLE 13A, CGNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0561
0562
0563
0564
0565
0567
0568
0569
0570
0571
0572
0573
0574
0575
0576
0577
0578
0579
0580
0581
0583
0584
0585
0586
0587
0588
0589
0590
0591
0592
YEAR
1970
1972
1970
1969
1970
1968
1968
1972
1966
1970
1970
1966
1968
1970
1968
1972
1968
1969
1972
1969
1969
1971
1968
1970
1971
1972
1968
1971
1967
1971
MAKE
CHEV
CADI
FORD
DODG
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
DODG
CADI
VOLK
PONT
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHRY
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
FORD
DODG
DODG
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
CID
400
472
302
383
250
164
430
225
429
97
350
283
327
200
383
122
396
91
400
350
351
140
307
351
98
360
318
455
289
350
HC
6.49
0.45
3.76
11. 48
3.49
8.21
4.95
2.54
6.42
3.73
3.92
6.99
7.16
3.00
5.95
2.74
7.56
4.49
3.37
6.25
3.26
7.34
5.05
3.47
5.71
4.01
5.04
3.23
5.92
2.64
CO
115.9
20.7
56.1
74.1
19.4
94.6
55.4
36.2
147.4
47.8
71.2
91o6
53.4
48.8
89.5
39.9
78.3
58*1
54.1
122.7
23.5
60.8
43.2
39.3
94.5
61 cO
84o7
52o4
89o3
20.8
C02
491 .7
1031.7
499.7
421.8
477.0
340.2
573.0
412.9
556.7
310.9
635.0
429.4
450.3
352.1
491.2
345.0
376.3
299.7
509.4
504.4
578.1
324.8
552.4
611.9
273.9
676.4
451.4
781.7
466*6
617.3
NO
2.28
2.44
2.57
2.99
4.96
1.83
3.68
3-90
1.79
2.32
2.93
2.78
3.62
2.24
4.08
2.53
1.43
2.00
4.40
3.46
5.24
1.91
5.60
5.03
1.58
5.73
4.19
3.17
3.39
4.13
N02
0«37
0.44
0.51
1*36
2.05
0.27
0.79
1.13
0.22
0.59
0.58
0«97
i.27
0°34
2.16
0.55
0.14
0.32
2.46
0.88
3.33
0.44
4.47
2.47
0.22
2»!4
J »24
1.80
1.55
1.71
NOX
2.65
2.87
3.09
4.35
7.01
2.1 1
4.48
5.03
2.01
2.91
3.51
3.74
4.88
2o58
6.24
3.08
1.56
2.32
6.86
4.34
8.57
2.34
10.07
7.50
1=80
7.88
5 = 43
4.97
4.95
5.84
NOXC
2.17
2.86
3.03
4.39
7.37
2.14
4.67
5.21
2.10
2.52
3.02
3.15
4.20
2.26
5.47
2.72
1.37
1.99
6.09
3.74
7.03
1.98
8.45
6.25
1 .51
6.37
4.34
4.40
4.25
5.01
I. CO
6.60
1.35
4.65
5.05
0.36
7.79
1.13
0.21
2.97
5.50
5.10
5.00
5.38
0.91
3.82
3.13
2.78
5.32
2.13
4.72
0.56
3*00
3.50
0.22
3.60
2.20
3.12
3.05
3.22
0*10
FUEL
ECON
12.8
8.3
14.8
15.4
17.1
17.2
13.1
18.6
11.0
22.3
11.7
14.9
15.9
20.3
13.6
21.3
17.0
21.9
14.7
12.4
14.2
20.0
13.9
13.0
20.1
11.3
14.8
10.2
14.2
13.5
15U
-------
TABLE 13A* CGNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0592R
0593
0594
0594R
0595
0596
0597
0598
0598R
0599
0599R
0600
0601
0602
0603
0604
0605
0606
0607
0608
0609
0610
0611
0612
0613
061 3R
0614
0615
0616
0617
YEAR MAKE
1971 CHEV
1968 FORD
1970 VOLK
1970 VOLK
1969 CADI
1968 CHEV
1972 MERC
1971 OLDS
1971 OLDS
1972 CHEV
1972 CHEV
1971 PONT
1969 MERC
1966 PONT
1971 CHEV
1971 TOYO
1967 OLDS
1 9 69 CHEV
1966 CHEV
1971 CHEV
1970 PLYM
1968 CADI
1968 VOLK
1966 PLYM
1969 PLYM
1969 PLYM
1967 PONT
1969 OLDS
1967 BUIC
1969 PONT
CID
350
289
97
97
472
307
400
455
455
350
350
350
390
326
307
96
330
307
283
400
225
472
91
225
225
225
326
455
340
350
HC
2.61
3.92
2.96
2.87
3.32
4.75
2.41
4.37
4.11
3.47
3.84
5.17
4.33
1 1.44
11.23
11.72
3.49
3.82
9.17
4.95
3.66
3.37
7.50
3.65
2.85
2.97
5.06
5.04
5.86
5.18
CO
22.6
43.6
46.6
44.6
56.2
69.5
22.0
106.2
97.7
61.4
61.0
76.0
71.7
120.2
60.9
183.5
33.7
41.5
77.5
80.8
77.1
25.4
83.3
43.9
52.8
57.2
70.8
65.5
121.7
86.0
CC2
606.8
517.1
348.4
331.8
714.7
525.8
683.0
670.8
684.2
647.0
654.1
569.5
603.9
549.7
495.5
243.4
544.9
491 .2
490.9
627.6
400.0
743.4
293.0
382.6
372.9
370.2
496.7
642.6
503.9
573.1
NO
4.46
3.99
2.88
2.95
5.40
4.39
5.26
4.04
4.32
3.48
3.66
3.10
5.97
3.53
3.31
0.45
3.35
4.35
3.39
3.21
4.28
5.91
1 .79
4.44
3.63
3.38
4.22
5.44
2.90
4.77
N02
1.31
1.65
0.80
0*64
2.61
2.08
3.07
2.01
2.53
1.25
1.32
1.22
2.47
1.10
1.29
0.02
1.03
1.47
1.03
0.84
1 .64
3.40
0.59
2.11
1.09
1.44
1.79
2.54
0.60
3.20
NGX
5.77
5.65
3.68
3.59
8.01
6.46
8.33
6.05
6.85
4.73
4.97
4.33
8.44
4.63
4.60
0.47
4.38
5.82
4.42
4.06
5.92
9.31
2.38
6.55
4.72
4.82
6.02
7.97
3.50
7.97
NGXC
4.88
4.86
3.12
3.03
6.88
5.35
7.00
5.01
5.70
3.88
3.94
3.55
6.99
3.75
3.75
0.38
3.69
5.04
3»76
3.53
5.00
8.02
1 .98
5.46
3.50
3.99
4.98
6.64
2.78
7.07
I. CO
0.11
2.13
2.66
2.76
2.00
3.40
0.10
7.26
7.10
5.32
5.30
7.55
4.10
6.03
1.33
2.45
0.42
2.13
0.10
2.92
0.80
0.17
7.30
1.33
1.78
1.90
6.00
1.40
4.20
3.52
FUEL
ECON
13.6
14.8
20.6
21.6
10.9
13.7
12.2
10.4
10.4
11.8
11.6
12.6
12.2
11.5
14.2
15.6
14.6
15.6
13.8
11.5
16.7
11.2
19.8
19.2
19.1
18.9
14.2
11.7
12.4
12.2
155
-------
TABLE 13A* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0619
0620
0621
0622
0623
0623R
0624
0624R
0625
0626
0627
0627R
0628
0628R
0629
0630
0631
0632
0633
0634
0635
0636
0636R
0637
0638
0639
0640
0641
0642
0643
YEAR MAKE
1968 FORD
1972 CHEV
1968 PONT
1971 CHEV
1967 FORD
1967 FORD
1972 FORD
1972 FORD
1972 CHEV
1970 FORD
1968 PONT
1968 PONT
1970 CHEV
1970 CHEV
1970 OLDS
1967 CHRY
1969 CHEV
1968 AMC
1967 CHEV
1970 DODG
1966 FORD
1966 FORD
1966 FORD
1967 MERC
1966 MERC
1971 PLYM
1966 VOLK
1972 PONT
1967 CHEV
1969 PONT
CID
390
350
400
350
390
390
351
351
402
302
350
350
307
307
455
383
230
343
327
318
390
289
289
390
390
318
78
350
283
400
HC
17.86
2.64
31.01
4.05
6.93
5.60
3.24
3*30
1.40
3.73
4.13
3.77
4.32
3.66
5.93
4.97
9.91
6.35
16.85
7.38
35.82
8.82
7.72
7.96
32.59
3.46
6» 06
4.31
5.56
3.58
CO
62.6
36.3
55.3
48.9
96.9
68.7
40.7
46.8
28.2
29.5
65.4
61.4
40.5
35.1
84.3
63.8
35.1
107.7
172-8
58.9
68.9
120.6
94.9
81.0
66.2
57.2
87*4
60.6
65.0
40.9
C02
485.5
600.8
530.8
552.8
555.2
537.6
793.2
770.0
729.5
607.0
593.5
565.0
522.1
501.7
672.9
650.6
469.1
450.6
401.7
577.4
530.6
523.6
479.0
625.8
565.9
500.3
282.5
589.4
475.5
561.0
NO
3.93
2.85
3.65
3.95
4.69
4.86
4.08
4.10
3.28
3.80
4.67
5.37
5.19
4.29
5.07
2.67
3.12
1 .61
2.09
4.83
5.30
3.41
3.29
7.26
3.93
3.35
1.84
2.74
3.62
4.41
N02
1.59
1.02
0.94
i.88
2°16
2.42
2.30
Io98
1.20
1 .64
3.60
2.65
2.68
2.77
2.59
0.60
1.04
0.20
0.35
1.81
2.84
Io30
0.95
4.27
2.40
1.79
0»39
0.87
1.09
1.80
NOX
5.52
3.87
4.80
5.83
6.85
7.28
6.38
6-09
4.49
5.44
8.27
8.03
7.87
7.06
7.65
3.27
4.16
1 .81
2.44
6.63
8.14
4.71
4.24
11.53
6.33
5.13
2.22
3.61
4.70
6.21
NOXC
4.74
3.13
4.00
4.72
5.80
6.20
5.14
4.80
3.71
4.47
6.71
6.41
6.29
5° 64
5.96
2.55
3.58
2.37
2.03
5.53
7.49
3.98
3.43
9.61
5.02
4.10
1.78
2.97
3.81
5.11
I. CO
4.22
2.71
2.32
2.09
5.50
5.52
1.08
0.65
1.90
0.08
4.50
4.72
0.85
0.78
6.54
4.10
2.66
4.72
3.32
1.50
0.60
0.96
0.80
3.02
0.20
4.80
7.80
2.46
0.60
1.13
FUEL
c. C 0 N
13.9
13.3
12.4
13.8
12.2
13.3
10.2
10.3
11.4
13.3
12.5
13.1
14.8
15.6
10.8
11.6
16.0
13.9
12.2
12.8
11.8
12.0
13.6
11.4
11.5
14.8
20.2
12.7
14.9
13.9
156
-------
TABLE 13A* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0644
0645
0646
0648
0649
0650
0651
0652
0653
0654
0655
0656
0657
0658
0659
0660
0661
0662
0664
0665
0666
0667
0668
0669
0670
0671
0672
0673
0674
0675
YEAR
1971
1966
1968
1966
1972
1972
1970
1971
1972
1968
1966
1967
1972
1969
1969
1967
1972
1967
1972
1966
1966
1971
1969
1970
1970
1972
1970
1967
1967
1971
MAKE
MERC
OLDS
FORD
BUIC
CHEV
DATS
TOYO
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
PONT
AMC
DODG
FORD
FORD
DODG
CHEV
PLYM
AMC
DODG
AMC
DATS
CID
400
330
289
340
140
97
1 16
400
350
429
283
194
429
350
318
283
350
289
455
232
361
429
200
318
230
318
304
318
290
97
HC
9.40
12.49
4.42
80 54
2.55
3.30
1.77
3.28
4.09
6.20
9.63
6.14
2.96
7.39
3.19
8.67
3.28
12.92
2.83
9.46
3.98
3.02
3.19
3.59
2.76
2.71
3.17
3.92
6.86
2.39
CO
57.3
78.9
63.0
151.2
53.9
31.2
21.7
49.0
75.9
168.1
144.7
85.0
25.5
129.6
27.5
88.0
74.3
97.4
41.3
205.6
57.4
33.2
41.2
65.9
41.4
26.4
60.2
21 .4
129.9
11.1
CG2
597.7
490.4
464.8
414.2
354.7
324.4
327.8
610.0
576.4
647.5
424.3
357.9
703.6
493.8
555.3
448.3
675.5
476.2
894.1
335.2
304.9
643.8
427.9
561.0
352.0
542.3
540.7
556.0
473.8
348.1
NO
3.55
4.59
2.45
1*96
2.77
3.29
2.71
3.55
2.46
2.69
1.43
2.66
5.54
3.13
4.94
2.66
2.75
1.90
4.79
1.22
1 .48
5.44
6.05
4.81
1.99
5.44
2.66
4.20
2.26
3.77
N02
1 .18
1 .95
0.64
0.33
0.80
1.26
0.74
0.99
0.43
0.45
0.23
0.45
1.70
0.64
2.37
0.86
0.43
0.47
1.20
0.08
0.20
2.47
2.44
2.96
0.61
2.98
0.68
2.74
0.44
2.11
NOX
4.73
6.54
3.09
2.30
3.56
4.55
3.45
4.54
2.90
3.14
1.66
3.11
7.24
3.77
7«31
3.53
3.17
2.37
5.99
1.30
1.68
7.91
8.49
7.77
2.59
8.42
3.35
6.95
2.70
5.89
NOXC
3.83
5.54
2.66
2.17
3.28
4.19
3.19
4.23
2.75
2.99
1.35
3.02
6.27
3.79
7.37
3.48
3.25
2.42
6.18
1 .23
1.60
7.09
7.72
6.74
2.30
6.91
2.79
5.66
2.17
5.21
I. CO
1.50
4.72
2.86
7.23
7.80
3.42
0.20
1 .45
5.70
6.50
4.80
8.10
1.54
4.62
0.75
1.50
3.40
4.42
3.12
2.68
2.61
2.46
3.34
6.60
2.95
1.50
5.70
0.12
4.30
0«33
FUEL
ECON
12.4
13.6
15.4
13.1
19.8
23.1
24.2
12.7
12.5
9.5
13.0
17.4
11.8
12.3
14.6
14.5
11.1
13.2
9.2
12.9
21.8
12.6
17.7
13.1
20.8
15.0
13.8
14.7
12.7
23.8
157
-------
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH*
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
0010
0012
0013
0014
0015
0016
0017
0018
0020
0021
0022
0024
0026
0027
0028
0029
0030
0031
0033
0034
0035
0038
0039
YEAR
1969
1970
1970
1969
1972
1969
1970
1968
1970
1970
1966
1969
1970
1969
1968
1972
1970
1969
1971
1968
1971
1970
1971
1972
1966
1966
1970
1967
1970
1971
MAKE
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CLDS
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
FCRD
PLYM
PCNT
FORD
BUIC
FORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
CHEV
FORD
BUIC
CHEV
TOYC
FCRD
CHEV
CHEV
CID
472
307
350
390
350
350
351
230
200
97
352
318
350
302
430
200
351
350
400
350
97
455
307
429
425
283
71
289
350
350
HC
5.21
5.32
5.43
5.95
4.77
6.24
4.07
7.63
3.47
3.90
7.97
7.12
7.07
6.74
9.39
3.45
8.01
6.11
6.27
4.21
3.60
6.12
6.49
5.32
12.51
8.03
5.17
7.58
5.87
5.46
CO
115.0
46.0
94.7
106.9
77.2
85.7
72.2
62.6
51 .8
77.1
104.1
170.3
131 .8
85.3
116.0
40.8
129.5
114.6
156.4
38.5
59.7
122.5
65.1
100.4
230.4
112.4
74.4
91.8
91.0
121 .6
C02
653.4
456.8
489.2
502.3
646.9
501.7
534.8
418.6
378.3
324.1
505.4
408.0
542.9
420.5
544.9
382.4
521 .9
507.0
720.9
560.4
287.5
593.2
456.8
650.6
457.2
490.7
466.1
450.9
510.8
539.7
NO
3.49
4.05
3.48
2.59
3-51
2.59
2.55
3.17
2.63
2.61
4.08
0.92
2.92
2.54
4.95
3.44
3.25
2.80
1 .82
3.02
1 .42
2.26
1.92
3.26
1 .46
2.26
3.77
3.85
2.85
1 .52
N02
0.88
0.89
0.70
0.38
0.81
0.64
0.34
0.74
0.43
0.40
1.00
0.06
1.02
0.47
1.72
1.10
0.54
0.51
0.12
0.71
0.12
0.26
0.21
0.68
0°12
Oo34
Oe89
0.84
0.73
0.17
NOX
4.38
4.94
4.17
2.97
4.32
3.22
2.89
3.90
3.06
3.01
5.09
0.99
3.94
3.01
6.66
4.55
3.79
3.31
1 .94
3.73
1.54
2.53
2.13
3«94
1 .58
2.59
4.66
4.69
3.58
1.69
NCXC
3.53
4.43
3.74
2.47
3.84
2.97
2.66
3.50
2.61
2.54
4.34
0.86
3.67
2.78
6.02
4.21
3.38
2.98
1 .73
3.72
1 .40
2.28
2.05
3.67
1 .31
2.17
4.05
4.10
3.12
1 .39
I. CO
3.57
3.10
6.10
3.57
1.27
7.08
3.82
7.04
3.40
4.30
5.30
3.30
7.23
6.67
7.23
2.68
5.20
6.70
1 .86
1.95
2.56
4.87
8.92
5.91
5.20
2.46
1.80
5.10
7.42
6.48
FUEL
tCON
10.4
16.3
13.5
12.9
11.3
13.5
13.4
16.4
18.9
19.4
12.8
12.7
11.5
15.4
11.7
19.4
11.8
12.6
9.0
14.0
22.6
11.0
15.3
10.8
10.3
12.8
14.8
14.3
13.2
11.9
158
-------
TABLE 13B, CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0041
0042
0043
0044
0045
0046
0048
0049
0051
0052
0052R
0054
0056
0057
0062
0063
0065
0066
0068
0069
0070
0071
0072
0073
0075
0076
0077
0077R
0078
0078R
YEAR
1970
1971
1971
1966
1966
1970
1967
1971
1971
1970
1970
1968
1971
1968
1969
1971
1969
1969
1969
1971
1966
1972
1966
1969
1968
1968
1968
1968
1967
1967
MAKE
PLYM
VOLK
FORD
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
DATS
OLDS
OLDS
PLYM
TOYO
FORD
BUIC
DODG
PONT
FORD
PONT
PLYM
VOLK
CADI
CADI
VCLK
FORD
CADI
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
CID
318
97
351
289
283
97
390
400
97
350
350
318
71
390
350
225
350
351
400
318
78
472
429
91
289
472
327
327
318
318
HC
4o84
3.48
4.67
14. 19
7.08
5.14
11.97
5.32
3. 19
6.40
5.86
6.00
4.01
6.89
6.23
4.76
4.65
6.82
5.81
4.35
5.83
2.73
5.85
5.18
4.61
4.21
5.19
5.43
18.14
17.46
CO
82.3
23.4
53.4
99.7
70.5
94.2
154.5
68.1
58.9
137.0
1 17.6
113.7
52.3
101 .8
161 .8
81 .9
45.4
77.5
100.2
68.5
97.2
124.3
103.5
81 .2
41.7
83.8
88.6
95.7
242.7
234.9
C02
562.6
380.7
542.5
494. 1
538.2
321.2
577.9
617.1
291 .6
571 .5
557.8
506.0
289.9
585.9
523.5
403.7
544.9
459.8
543.5
446.2
202.5
868.4
635.1
237.3
475.5
742.5
625.1
579.1
371.5
374.0
NO
3.91
3.40
4.30
2.15
4.94
1 .81
3.45
6.10
2.03
2.43
2.53
2.57
2.19
2.54
2.58
2.75
4.84
4.04
3.70
2.67
0.75
1.83
4.66
1 .46
3.32
4.61
2.52
2.19
0.78
0.72
N02
1.00
0.63
1 .02
0.33
1 .59
0.20
1 .01
1 .80
0.28
0.44
0.37
0.37
0.27
0.31
0.59
0.44
1.32
0.93
0-66
0.33
0.04
0.16
1.11
0.13
0.59
1.22
0*44
0.26
0.10
0.06
NOX
4.91
4.03
5.32
2.49
6.54
2.02
4.46
7.90
2.31
2.86
2.90
2.94
2.46
2.85
3.18
3.19
6.16
4.97
4.36
3.00
0.79
1 .99
5.77
1.59
3.90
5.83
2.97
2.45
0.88
0.78
NCXC
4.20
3-52
4.54
2.13
5.80
1 .62
3.82
6.66
1 .96
2.53
2.49
2.50
2.09
2.41
2.76
2.72
5.24
4.10
3.71
2.54
0.67
1 .67
4.90
1.39
3.28
4.93
2.52
2.03
0.74
0.65
I. CO
2.60
0.20
3.50
0.25
1 .86
3.34
0.50
2.00
2.30
4.40
3.80
3.70
2.40
2.90
2.00
1 .20
1.70
7.60
2.60
5.10
2.35
1.60
0.50
7.40
1 .99
1.60
5.00
5.70
5.50
5.10
FUEL
ECON
12.5
20.7
13.8
12.8
13.2
18.3
10.3
12.0
22.5
11.0
11.6
12.6
23.1
11.6
11.1
16.2
14.1
14.7
12.3
15.6
23.8
8.3
10.9
23.3
16.0
10.0
11.4
11.8
13.7
11.1
159
-------
TABLE 13B* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH*
0079
0080
0081
0082
0083
0084
0086
0087
0089
0091
0092
0094
0095
0096
0098
0100
0102
0103
0105
0107
0108
0109
0110
0111
0112
0113
0114
0116
0117
0118
YEAR
1966
1967
1972
1966
1968
1972
1970
1971
1969
1970
1971
1972
1969
1971
1972
1972
1972
1970
1970
1971
1970
1971
1972
1969
1972
1970
1972
1971
1967
1971
MAKE
PONT
VCLK
CHRY
PONT
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
MERC
FORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
MERC
BUIC
FORD
FORD
DODG
BUIC
DCDG
OPEL
OLDS
BUIC
AMC
PLYM
PLYM
FORD
CHRY
FORD
CID
326
91
400
389
400
97
350
351
302
302
350
400
350
350
351
455
351
250
318
350
383
116
455
430
258
225
318
429
383
302
HC
6-69
20.03
5.52
6.59
3.95
5.49
5.83
4.66
8.12
7.05
3.94
16.84
8.68
5.70
4.25
3.60
4.34
3.39
4.76
4.07
5.48
2.72
4.03
6*18
2.66
4.60
6.95
5.33
9.78
4.81
CO
77.0
158.4
130.2
111 .4
38.6
76.4
166.3
71 .8
116.2
77.2
99.4
108.3
162.3
84.7
98.7
67.4
55.8
42.1
73.7
92.9
103.6
47.5
36.2
1 15.9
56.4
82.4
119.8
74.8
241 .9
55.7
CO 2
503.7
210.4
578.0
513.9
612.5
303.8
452.5
607.8
472.4
526.2
592.5
650.1
483.5
575.5
549.8
783.9
571 .6
395.9
494.0
500.0
549.7
322.9
676.0
420.4
418.3
332.5
507.8
665.1
537.6
534.3
NO
3.67
1.00
2.16
2.04
3.55
1.60
1.19
3.40
2.66
4.63
2.06
1 .90
2.17
2.82
2.76
4.45
3.33
3.07
3.43
1.66
4.16
2.36
3.54
1.93
1.99
2.66
2.69
4.74
1.09
2.66
NO 2
0.90
0.10
0«28
0.18
0.69
0.18
0.06
0.67
0.42
0.93
0.23
0.37
0.24
0.41
0.57
1 .60
0.94
0.48
0.70
0.16
1.16
0.27
1.54
0.23
0.21
0.44
0.50
1.24
0.09
0.52
NOX
4.57
1.09
2.44
2.22
4.23
1 .77
1.25
4.07
3.07
5.56
2.28
2.28
2.40
3.23
3.33
6.05
4.27
3.55
4.14
1.83
5.32
2.63
5.08
2.16
2.21
3.10
3.19
5.98
1.18
3.38
NOXC
3.88
0.92
2.03
1.87
3.57
1 .51
1 .04
3-36
2.51
4.66
1 .96
1.91
2.02
2.73
3.17
4.96
4.04
3.00
3-48
1 .53
4.42
2.20
4.99
1 .84
2.09
2.63
2.96
5.10
1 .00
3.27
T r+ f\
J. • l_/O
5.40
10.40
1.20
2.20
0.09
4.70
7.42
1.75
5.30
5.50
4.50
4.50
8.90
2.70
2.77
4.48
3.57
4.40
5.90
5.40
5.50
5.90
0.94
2.10
1.70
0.94
8.10
5.20
1.20
1.77
FUEL
ECON
13.7
17.0
11.1
12.5
12.9
20.1
12.1
12.1
13.0
13.2
11.7
10.2
11.6
12.2
12.4
9.8
13.2
18.8
14.2
13.5
12.2
21.8
11.9
14.3
17.2
18.6
12.4
11.1
9.4
13.9
160
-------
TABLE 13B* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0119
0120
0121
0123
0124
0125
0126
0127
0128
0129
0130
0131
0132
0133
0134
0135
0136
0136R
0137
0138
0139
0140
0141
0142
0143
0144
0145
0146
0147
0148
YEAR
1967
1972
1971
1972
1966
1968
1968
1971
1972
1967
1970
1967
1972
1968
1969
1971
1972
1972
1969
1968
1972
1966
1972
1967
1968
1972
1972
1972
1967
1966
MAKE
FORD
FORD
CHEV
FORD
AMC
CHRY
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
PONT
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
FORD
FORD
OLDS
AMC
PONT
CHEV
VOLK
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
BUIC
MERC
OLDS
CID
289
122
350
400
232
440
91
140
307
283
429
400
350
428
230
455
302
302
455
343
350
283
97
330
170
350
140
350
390
330
HC
12.01
5.85
4.46
4.38
7.56
12.24
6.32
4.29
4.30
9.12
10.87
9.83
2.62
9.78
7.28
5.13
4.38
4.44
4.97
6.01
5.86
32.25
2.35
37.66
3.89
3.84
3.39
4.77
6.48
5.84
CO
169.6
74.9
35.3
83.6
166.1
156.5
70.0
79.2
36.3
140.6
73.5
124.4
37.2
168.2
91 .0
89.0
78.7
80.5
137^8
103.0
125.4
131.7
32.0
217.5
88.1
59.1
54.!
78.5
94.1
65.9
C02
363.6
301.6
646.5
686.3
344.7
573.1
246.4
321.1
620.3
396.8
664.3
466.7
521.7
597.3
299.9
663.7
568.7
592.2
739.3
406.7
608.5
306.8
365.6
435.2
356.0
601.3
399.2
683.8
481.3
510.7
NO
1 .26
1.67
3.50
5.62
1.11
2.27
1.91
1.97
3.04
1 .48
3.37
3.54
1.66
4.47
1.20
3.38
2.37
2.30
2.15
1.52
1.88
0.89
4.95
0 . 95
1.47
2.12
0.78
3.32
3.16
2.52
N02
0.14
0.16
0.62
1.90
0.16
0.23
0-15
0.25
0.79
0.19
0.57
0.78
0.25
0.84
0.14
0.65
0.30
0.50
0.27
0.17
0.21
0*10
1.78
0.09
0.22
0.38
0.09
0.53
0.51
0.56
NOX
1.40
1.84
4.12
7.52
1 -27
2.51
2.06
2.23
3.83
1 .67
3.94
4.32
1 .90
5.31
1.34
4.04
2.67
2.80
2.42
1.69
2.10
0.99
6.73
1.05
1.69
2.50
0«87
3.85
3.67
3.08
NOXC
1.29
1.71
3*41
6.27
1.08
2.11
1 .71
2.06
3.60
1.35
3.23
3.36
1.77
4.25
1 .06
3.24
2.07
2.33
1.93
1.52
1.67
0.79
5.38
0.83
1 .35
2.26
0.79
3.13
2.92
2.78
I. CO
8.92
1 .40
0.60
7.40
7.23
3.80
1.30
6.86
0.29
6.10
3.20
7.40
1 .52
9.47
6.40
5.20
4.40
4.61
5.10
1.35
5.40
1.10
3.80
5.30
1.01
0.50
0.94
1.70
5.00
0.87
FUEL
ECON
13.3
20.3
12.4
10.7
14.1
10.3
23.6
19.3
12.8
13.7
10.9
12.8
15.1
9.9
19.0
10.8
12.6
12.1
9.1
15.1
10.8
14.4
21.0
9.9
17.5
12.6
17.9
10.8
13.7
14.0
161
-------
TABLE 13B* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0149
0150
0151
0152
0152R
ul53
0154
0155
0156
0157
0158
0159
0160
0160R
0161
0163
0163R
0164
0165
0166
0166R
0167
0168
0169
0170
0171
0172
0173
0174
0175
YEAR
1971
1970
1968
1972
1972
1968
1972
1968
1969
1967
1970
1972
1971
1971
1970
1970
1970
1968
1972
1971
1971
1971
1969
1972
1968
1971
1968
1966
1969
1970
MAKE
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
FORD
DODG
OLDS
MERC
PONT
PONT
FORD
PLYM
PLYM
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
CHEV
DODG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
DODG
FORD
CID
170
400
307
360
360
289
360
350
390
326
400
351
198
198
455
250
250
302
350
383
383
98
307
454
318
351
307
200
383
302
HC
6.21
5.78
6.07
5.72
6.31
5.75
5.52
5.25
6.67
8.41
5.74
5.91
11 .67
11.09
6.72
3.53
3.65
5.02
4.74
9.07
9.21
4.21
5.71
2.38
7.67
4.56
20.09
6.58
5.40
5.12
CO
82.4
91 .6
56.8
120.3
131 .4
94.5
148.7
82.0
52.7
119.6
74.4
1 15.7
155.7
148.0
129.4
55.9
54.3
57.3
111.1
188.2
186.2
55.8
64.2
64.4
128.3
41.9
343.1
60.5
111.6
44.5
C02
31 1 .2
530.9
522.2
619.3
609.6
468. 1
502.7
537.7
608.1
477.0
707.5
715.0
297.4
308.4
629.5
410.4
409.6
630.8
597.8
559.8
575.5
243.6
411 .3
775.6
507.9
544.4
435.6
348.7
646.1
442.1
NO
1 .65
2.81
4.36
5.02
4.70
.2.59
3.14
2.83
5.66
1 .46
5.52
2.78
1 .34
1.39
2.80
3.15
3.28
2.07
1.98
1.32 .
1.36
2.30
2.96
1.98
2.10
4.02
1.22
2.70
. 2.89
2.68
NC2
0.28
0.88
1.11
1 .38
1 .76
0.39
0-63
0.48
2.66
0-15
1 .96
0.70
0.16
0.15
0.54
0.73
0.70
0.31
0.28
0.10
0.08
0.34
0.43
0.19
0.57
1.08
0.25
0.91
0.36
0*40
NOX
1.94
3.69
5.46
6.39
6.46
2.97
3.76
3.30
8.32
1.62
7.47
3.48
1.50
1.54
3.35
3.88
3.98
2.39
2.25
1.42
1.44
2.64
3.38
2.17
2.67
5.09
1.47
3*61
3.26
3.08
NOXC
1 .53
3.49
4.31
5.14
5.17
2.38
3.03
2.64
6.78
1.36
6.82
3.33
1.21
1.29
2.71
3.12
3.23
2.27
2.16
1 .46
1.23
2.22
2.83
1.78
2.19
4.13
1.24
3.02
2.63
2.62
I. CO
6.43
4.08
0.16
4.80
4.80
6.20
7.70
5-90
0.14
0.79
5.62
0.29
10.00
9.00
9.80
6.80
8.10
2.25
8.64
6.65
6.70
6.80
2.60
5.30
1.20
3.30
6.30
3.50
3.50
0.19
FUEL
ECON
19.3
12.8
14.1
10.7
10.6
14.0
11.8
13.0
12.5
12.8
10.5
9.7
15.3
15.4
10.4
17.4
17.5
13.8
11.3
10.0
9.8
25.8
16.7
10.0
12.1
14.2
8.5
19.1
10.6
16.8
162
-------
TABLE ,13B, -CON.TVD
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL TEST .PROCEDURE
VEH#
0176
0176R
0177
0178
0179
0180
0181
0182
0183
0184
0185
0186
0187
0188
0189
0190
0191
0192
0193
0194
0195
0196
0197
0197R
0198
0199
0200
0201
0202
0203
YEAR
1969
1969
1971
1972
1970
1967
1968
1967
1967
1966
1967
1972
1967
1972
1971
1967
1966
1966
1971
1969
1972
1971
1972
1972
1972
1969
1966
1967
1970
1972
MAKE
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
DATS
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
AMC
PLYM
BUIC
BUIC
CHEV
PONT
LINC
CHEV
DODG
MERC
OLDS
PLYM
TCYO
PONT
PLYM
PLYM
DODG
FORD
CHEV
DODG
AMC
CHEV
CID
307
307
350
97
440
283
396
230
232
225
300
455
283
400
460
283
383
390
455
225
97
455
360
360
225
200
250
225
390
350
:HC
4.33
4.22
6.i57
3.64
4.:53
36.21
5.22
6.39
4.95
6.60
8. -6 3
2.79
1 1.81
4.22
5.85
20.23
5.63
16.16
5.90
2.91
4.63
4 .'9 6
6.51
5.72
4.15
5.09
10.84
11.32
5.79
4.29
'CO
45. 3
43..S
M 19.5
88.0
73.0
.1 63«-6
104. .3
129.3
88.7.
200.3
.118.9
55.6
216.6
50 . 4
94.4
133.5
86.0
228.6
48-0
37 • 6
79.2
83.9
110. 8
82 ..5
83.2
74.;3
155.2
229.9
70.9
93.4
C02
4.1:2 .6
418.V5
'650 • 7
3 1.0 .-5
675.0
382 .2
540.7
322.8
319.4
295.2
403-0
687.0
440.8
65 1 . 9
60 8. "1
408.1
577V2
508 .5
687.9
347.8
278.6
533. -9
584.0
606.4
377 ..2
344.4
271 .3
281 .1
505.0
533.1
'NO
2.38
2.45
1 .87
2 .0 6
4.25
1-..26
2 .'01
1 .69
1 .93
0.35
1 .98
4..56
0.77
2.76
3.60
1.61
1.54
1.17
3 .03
4.30
1.39
1 .50
3.21
3.63
2.85
2.03
0.96
0.27
3.14
2.58
NC2
•0.36
0.83
0.19
0.39
0.92
0-.14
0.20
0.46
0.61
0 .03
0.26
1 .51
0.04
0.91
1-03
0.24
0.15
0.13
0.82
1 .45
0.15
0.25
0.88
0.82
0.62
0.21
0 .09
0.04
0.63
0.40
NCX
2.74
3V28
.2.0.6
2.44
5.1 '6
1 .40
2.21
2 .1 6
2.54
0.38
2.25
6.07
0.82
3.66
4.62
1.85
1 .69
1-30
3.86
5.75
1.54
1.75
4.09
4.45
3.47
2 • 24
1.05
0.31
3.77
2.99
NOXC
2 .33
2.69
1.93
,2.06
4.32
1.16
1 .85
1.80
2.12
0.32
1.90
5.85
0.88
3.45
4.65
1 .93
1.72
1.28
3.89
5.70
1 .53
1.72
3.81
4.12
3.28
1-96
1.1.0
0.33
3.39
2.64
I. CO
2.20
0.43
5.72
5.40
3.50
7.50
0.25
7.60
6.00
5.30
7.20
0.12
5.90
2.84
6.23
6.39
0.50
9.05
1.89
7.52
2.84
5.59
2.16
2.20
6.79
7.12
5.92
7.20
3.56
7.36
FUEL
tCON
17.8
17.7
10.3
24.3
11.0
11.8
12.3
16.2
18.7
14.1
14.4
11.4
10.8
11.9
11.5
13.0
12.2
9.7
11.3
21.3
21.2
13.0
11.4
11.7
17.0
18.6
16.2
13.1
14.0
12.8
163
-------
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0301
0302
0303
0304
0305
G306
0307
0308
0309
0310
0311
0312
0313
0314
0315
0316
0317
0318
0319
0320
0322
0383
0324
0325
0326
0327
0328
0329
0330
0330R
YEAR
1966
1972
1970
1970
1971
1966
1971
1972
1971
1971
1968
1972
1966
1972
1966
1970
1972
1969
1972
1966
1971
1968
1966
1969
1972
1971
1971
1969
1969
1969
MAKE
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
OLDS
CHEV
VOLK
AMC
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
BUIC
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CADI
PONT
CADI
TOYO
FORD
OLDS
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
CID
390
350
350
455
350
283
429
350
400
97
290
400
283
400
389
97
455
307
350
194
350
472
326
472
120
351
455
200
350
350
HC
6.77
2.48
4.16
11.88
2.45
8.35
5.50
3*46
2.38
2.48
5.11
2.67
8.69
26.28
5.28
4.20
1.86
3.36
2.51
4.37
4.06
3.61
7.06
3.66
1.54
4.98
3.39
2.62
5.51
4.91
CO
65.8
46.3
-131.8
170.4
55.2
103.9
86.7
58.6
29.6
41 .9
57.6
18.9
120.0
56.6
55.9
42.9
15.9
50.0
31 .0
64.3
55.3
72.8
66.2
57.8
21.2
57.5
58.8
18.4
108.9
74.1
CC2
543.0
776.6
612.2
621 .7
532.4
452.2
555.5
631.7
635.3
304.8
512.5
706.0
449*5
571.6
526.5
308.6
767.6
492.0
620.3
333.1
599.9
665.2
456.5
668.5
380.2
570.6
665.3
471-1
469.6
500.2
NO
3.21
3.06
2.08
1.71
5.09
1 .90
2.18
3.15
3.54
1 .86
3.13
4.45
3.42
4.85
4.22
2.44
5.48
3.96
3.05
2.50
4.88
4.13
4.39
4.86
2.92
3.55
4.80
4.16
2.43
3.36
NC2
1.51
1.15
0.33
0.39
0.52
0.65
0.57
1 .48
1 .26
0.32
1.57
1 .61
0.99
1.86
1.80
0.48
2.48
1.44
0.73
0.54
1.69
1.63
1.80 .
2.48
0.74
0.85
2.24
2.12
0.60
1 .24
NOX
4.73
4.21
2.41
2.10
5.60
2.55
2.75
4.63
4.80
2.17
4.70
6.06
4.42
6.72
6.01
2.92
7.96
5.40
3.78
3.04
6.57
5.76
6.19
7.35
3.66
4.40
7.05
6.28
3.03
4.60
NOXC
4.17
3.72
2.09
1 .83
4.83
2.33
2.43
4.18
4.42
2.03
4.00
5.30
3.73
5.72
5.36
2.55
7.21
5.08
3.50
2.83
5.88
5.25
5-86
7.06
3.45
4.23
6.72
5.89
2.81
4.07
I. CO
3.93
0.12
7.89
7.62
0.10
2.62
5.40
0.41
1 .45
1 .53
8.73
0.41
6.86
2.00
1 .60
4.70
0.93
1 .00
1 .37
0.74
1.06
0.56
2.40
0.65
3.80
2.00
5.00
0.59
2.29
4.90
FUEL
ECON
13.3
10.4
10.7
9.6
14.2
13.8
12.5
12.1
12.9
23.4
14.3
11.9
13.3
11.9
14.1
22.8
11.1
15.3
13.1
19.8
12.7
11.2
15.2
11.5
21.2
13.1
11.6
17.5
13.5
14.0
16U
-------
TABLE 13B, CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0331
0331R
0332
0333
0334
0335
0336
0337
0338
0339
0341
0342
0343
0344
0346
0347
0348
0350
0351
0353
0354
0355
0356
0357
0358
0359
0360
0361
0362
0363
YEAR
1971
1971
1966
1972
1970
1967
1971
1970
1969
1971
1972
1969
1970
1971
1971
1969
1967
1972
1968
1970
1972
1971
1972
1967
1972
1972
1968
1972
1968
1972
MAKE
BUIC
BUIC
AMC
CADI
CHRY
VOLK
TOYO
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
FORD
PLYM
PONT
PONT
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
FORD
OLDS
MERC
CHEV
AMC
C.I.D
455
455
232
472
440
91
71
351
307
350
455
455
307
97
318
350
400
351
396
350
360
350
318
318
400
302
350
400
307
258
HC
3.09
3.22
12.86
1.16
3.79
3.95
5.56
24.66
3.38
3.48
1.49
4.09
5.07
2.52
2.46
4.28
7.10
2.80
3.99
4.67
4.07
3.89
3.26
4. 16
1.75
2.53
4.24
2.08
6.33
0.93
CO
41 . 1
45.0
109.4
13.4
51.5
62.3
19.5
102.4
40.6
85.1
9.3
85.1
77.2
21.6
28.4
68.9
72.3
34.1
60.7
91.0
88.5
20.6
49.4
40.0
11 .8
40.1
58.4
14.2
54.1
7.8
C02
740.3
720.7
359.3
826.6
671 .7
285.2
345.1
451.7
498.5
656.2
876.4
594.1
416.3
309.4
563.5
510.8
490.8
645.1
511.4
509.5
570.8
611.7
505.9
466.8
638.5
623.7
536.6
705.4
463.2
394.1
NO
4.16
4.24
1 .45
2.26
3.74
2*46
3.43
4.60
3.85
3.39
6.37
4.38
2.75
3.04
4.20
5.44
6.1 1
3.75
3.15
2.46
4.87
4.59
5.18
4.48
2.74
2.25
2.93
5.62
4.14
1 .44
N02
2.44
1.90
0.33
1.67
1.24
0.69
0.81
2.05
1 .28
1.84
3.44
1.95
0.70
0.75
1 .50
2.49
2.44
0.98
0.61
0.49
2.36
1.87
2.00
1.71
0.92
0.45
0.57
2.54
2.21
0.32
;NOX
6.59
6.14
•1.78
3.93
4.99
3.15
4.24
6.65
5.13
5.23
9.81
6.32
3.46
3.80
5.69
7.93
8.55
4.73
3.76
2.95
7.24
6.46
7.19
6.20
3.66
2.70
3.50
8.17
6.35
1.75
NOXC
6.21
5.62
1.66
3.66
4.72
2.69
4.51
5.94
4.55
4.67
9.15
5.86
3.18
3.50
5.25
6.93
7.57
3.90
3.33
2.43
6.60
6.12
6.71
5.70
3.47
2.56
3*25
7.40
5.93
1 .67
I. CO
2.29
3.30
1.45
0.70
1.86
1 .63
2.07
4.00
1 .95
5.00
0.11
1.73
4.40
3.64
0.79
1 .60
7.60
3.15
2.10
3.54
8.05
1 .95
4.91
1.19
0.46
2.14
4.13
0.10
6.09
0.17
FUE.L
ECON
10.9
11.0
15.5
10.4
11.6
22.4
22.6
12.8
15.5
11.1
9.9
12.0
16.0
25.3
14.4
14.0
14.2
12.5
14.3
13.3
12.3
13.5
14.9
16.4
13.4
12.8
13.8
12.1
15.6
21.7
165
-------
TABLE 13B* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0364
0365
0366
0367
0368
0369
0370
0371
0372
0374
0375
0376
0377
0378
0379
0380
0381
0382
0383
0384
0385
0385R
0386
0387
0388
0389
0390
0391
0392
0393
YEAR
1969
1972
1972
1972
1972
1971
1968
1969
1966
1968
1970
1972
1967
1969
1972
1967
1967
1968
1972
1970
1968
1968
1966
1969
1966
1971
1969
1971
1972
1971
MAKE
PLYM
CHRY
FORD
FORD
DCDG
DODG
DODG
FORD
OLDS
FORD
MERC
DATS
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
MERC
MERC
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
DODG
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CID
318
400
122
351
225
225
318
302
330
289
429
97
283
91
302
327
283
307
140
400
302
302
200
350
78
383
350
302
97
307
HC
5.13
5. 14
3.20
3.13
2.94
3.27
3.59
4.47
10.14
5.41
5.20
1.86
7.58
4.39
3.02
6.66
12.14
11.53
2.73
4.07
3.45
3.67
10.91
6.61
5.47
9.79
3.38
2.81
3.50
4.43
CO
66.1
99.6
30.1
47.0
59.6
54.3
82.2
42.2
133.2
74.4
44.4
19.6
91.2
38.9
29.0
96.3
103.1
115.1
47.6
60.6
11.9
11.8
115.3
86.3
66.7
262.1
51.8
32.2
57.2
87.9
CCS
538.2
676.1
352.1
639.0
434.1
431.9
468.8
50 1 . 2
514.7
491.6
786.7
336.2
546.9
322.7
585.8
580.0
485.8
517.5
443*2
682.1
635.6
614.2
470.4
608.4
334.0
613-8
536.5
648.8
391.1
535.8
NO
3.86
3.37
2.80
4.09
3.76
3.48
3.14
5.81
3.28
2.38
6.91
2.89
3.48
2.91
2.62
2.48
2.16
3.00
1 .92
4.00
3.69
3.40
1 .22
3.39
2.10
1.02
2.21
1.57
2.17
3.47
NC2
2.63
1 .26
0.66
1.07
1 .49
1.39
1.11
2.43
0.71
0.76
3.57
0.74
1 .21
0.65
0.51
0.56
0.52
0.77
0.28
1.10
1.01
0.76
0*12
0.92
0.27
0.22
0.55
0.50
0.35
1 .01
NOX
6.48
4.63
3.46
5.16
5.24
4.87
4.25
8.24
3.99
3.14
10.48
3.63
4.69
3.57
3.12
3.03
2.68
3.77
2.20
5.09
4.70
4.16
1 .34
4.31
2.37
1 .24
2.76
2.07
2.53
4.48
NOXC
6.65
4.60
3.45
5.34
5.47
5.12
4.17
8.05
3.82
2.82
9.46
3.52
4.64
3.63
3.11
2.88
2.62
3.81
2.20
5.22
5.20
4.46
1 .46
4.57
2.49
1.32
2.99
2.15
2.71
4.88
I. CO
2.68
5.30
5.11
3.04
6.09
3.64
0.33
4.13
7.50
3.23
0.28
5.30
4.42
4.61
2.06
6.86
3.05
7.50
1.40
5.50
0.39
1.20
1.94
9.10
0.36
6.86
5.21
2.10
3.60
5.79
FUEL
ECON
13.5
10.5
21.7
12.3
16.5
16.8
14.6
15.3
11.7
14.2
10.2
23.8
12.4
22.3
13.8
11.8
12.9
12.1
16.9
11.2
13.3
13.7
12.9
11.6
19.5
8.4
14.1
12.5
18.0
12.9
166
-------
TABLE 138* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0393R
0394
0395
0396
0397
0397R
0398
0399
0400
0401
0401R
0402
0403
0404
0405
0405R
0406
0407
0408
0409
0410
0412
0413
0414
0414R
0415
0416
0417
0418
0419
YEAR
1971
1967
1968
1971
1967
1967
1972
1968
1978
1970
1970
1971
1970
1970
1970
1970
1969
1966
1970
1971
1967
1968
1967
1966
1966
1969
1971
1969
1969
1967
MAKE
CHEV
AMC
CHEV
OLDS
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
FORD
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
FORD
OLDS
OLDS
PONT
BUIC
FORD
MERC
OLDS
BUIC
FORD
CADI
CADI
FORD
FORD
PLYM
FORD
PONT
CID
307
232
327
350
300
300
350
390
350
302
302
402
318
200
350
350
400
340
250
351
330
430
289
429
429
302
351
225
351
326
HC
3.79
3. .2 3
28.62
4.25
7.40
7.60
2.32
4.75
3.21
2.81
3.29
3.37
2.42
4.30
3.15
3.29
3.62
15.16
5.04
3.30
6.71
5.78
5.52
5.29
5.41
5.15
4.61
2.68
4.84
10.08
CO
72.5
43.8
74 .9
55.2
139.3
-1 50 . 3
30.2
58.9
67.8
52.7
53.6
65.8
23.5
1 6 .5
34.1
33.2
63.0
160.6
125.9
51 .1
84.6
77.5
77.2
98.6
98.8
41.6
67.9
33.2
53.8
76.8
cca
493.2
347.0
497.8
71;6«5
513.9
519.2
715.1
665.1
653.2
538.3
538.8
670 . 9
511.5
337.6
540.8
509.3
608.4
429.7
453.0
625.6
506.6
61 7 .7
386.5
631.7
666 . 9
455.1
599.8
504.1
482.2
432.3
NC
3.'48
3 .26
2.19
5. '4 5
2.38
2 .48
3.31
4.80
2.43
2.38
3.59
2.80
3.81
3.30
2.48
2.99
2.26
0.93
1.20
2.93
2.23
4.77
1 .57
2.58
2.87
5.43
5.70
4.36
3V96
3.66
NC2
0.56
1.47
0.57
2.03
0.41
0.29
O.'SO
2. 19
0.58
0.66
1 .01
0.91
1 .30
1 .03
0.70
0.67
0.58
0.10
0.09
0-54
0.32
1.49
0.35
0.50
0.69
2.18
1.99
1.11
1.12
0.92
NOX
4.03
4 .7-3
'2 . 7-6
7 . 48
2.79
2.77
3-81
6.98
3.02
3.04
4.60
3.71
5.12
4.33
3.18
3.66
2.84
1.03
1 .29
3.48
2.55
6.26
1.91
3.08
3.56
7.61
7.70
5.47
5.09
4.58
NOXC
4.15
5.16
2.61
7.5-6
2.84
3.03
4.05
7.19
3.21
3.26
4.37
3.88
5.35
4.38
3.15
3.48
2.99
1.16
1.47
3.94
2.74
6.19
1 .63
2.98
3.33
7.31
7.10
4.84
4.63
4.14
I. CO
5.21
5.11
2.00
3.20
6.50
6.40
2.40
1.13
7.31
3.10
2.51
6.55
1 .73
0.66
3.71
3.93
1 .82
5.70
1 .14
3.00
0.63
3-60
0.27
2.51
2*35
4.32
5.30
3.70
5.79
5.21
FULL
ECON
14.3
20.8
12.6
10.9
11.7
11.3
11.5
11.5
11.5
14.1
14.0
11.3
16.0
23.5
14.7
15.5
12.3
12.2
13.3
12.4
13.4
11.7
16.9
11.0
10.5
16.5
12.3
15.7
15.2
15.2
-------
TABLE 13B* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0
0420
0421
0422
0423
0424
0425
0426
0427
0428
0428R
0429
0430
0431
0432
0434
0435
0436
0437
0437R
0438
0439
0440
0441
0442
0443
0444
0445
0446
0447
0448
YEAR
1970
1972
1966
1971
1969
1969
1971
1968
1972
1972
1968
1966
1970
1968
1969
1971
1972
1972
1972
1970
1966
1967
1966
1968
1967
1970
1971
1967
1967
1970
MAKE
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
PONT
BUIC
FORD
PONT
PONT
PONT
PONT
FORD
FORD
BUIC
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
BUIC
BUIC
PONT
MERC
DODG
CHEV
FORD
FORD
PLYM
FORD
FORD
CHRY
AMC
CID
351
307
225
455
430
390
350
400
350
350
289
289
350
383
230
140
350
455
455
350
390
225
283
200
289
225
200
390
383
304
HC
3.72
3.08
3.31
2.26
6.35
3.40
3.40
4.73
4.68
4.73
3.16
14.25
3-93
10.38
4.89
3.67
4.04
2.05
2.07
2.25
7.11
3.19
10.90
"4.64
8.14
3.63
2.06
6.26
4.65
3.82
CO
47.6
8.3
39.2
17.7
101 .6
18.9
93.1
52.3
22.0
21.6
24.3
141.6
64.3
118.7
40.5
51.8
44.4
17.4
20.3
33.7
134.5
56.7
113.3
19.4
76.9
42.0
11 >8
191.1
62.6
29.0
C02
516.0
586.9
396.3
771.2
530.6
605.4
851.7
521 .7
646.9
6.38.0
492.4
383.6
539.6
521 .4
481 .6
268.7
479.3
727.8
715.6
611.7
629.4
363.3
412.5
422.7
452.3
346.8
385.2
434.3
445.7
534.4
NO
5.65
3.39
3.21
4.64
4.88
5.83
2.70
5.21
3.04
2.87
5.10
1.51
3.20
2.96
4.11
1 .28
2.08
4.40
4.61
2.50
1.97
3.00
2.45
4.62
2.2/1
2.37
2.38
0.76
3.08
3.50
N02
2.17
0.89
0.75
2.15
1 .92
3.29
0.44
0.33
0.38
0.41
0.47
0.19
0.56
0.53
1 .00
0.14
0.34
1 .97
1 .47
0.36
0.40
0.70
0.56
1.78
0.39
0.43
0.40
0.04
0.69
1.05
NCX
7.82
4.28
3.96
6.78
6.80
9.1 1
3.14
5.54
3.41
3.28
5.57
1 .70
3.76
3.49
5.1 1
1.42
2.42
6.36
6.09
2.86
2.37
3.70
3.01
6.40
2.63
2.80
2.78
0.80
3.78
4.55
NOXC
7.08
4.07
3-80
6.71
6.57
8.75
3.04
5.45
3.43
3.78
5.72
1 *68
4.15
3.90
5.92
1 .68
2.75
6.94
6.98
3.09
2.60
4.07
3.59
7.37
2.98
3.12
3.06
0.89
4.16
5.12
I. CO
2.91
0.12
0.14
0.18
6.55
0.08
7.16
3.20
0.19
0.55
5.11
0-84
3.00
3.10
0.14
7.62
5.64
1.82
1 .40
2.24
2.62
4.60
7.31
0.65
2.66
5.40
0.41
4.13
3.23
1 .82
FUEL
ECON
14.7
14.6
18.9
11.0
12.5
13.7
8.8
14.3
12.7
12.9
16.4
13.6
13.6
12.0
15.8
24.5
15.8
11 .7
11.7
13.2
10.3
19.2
14.2
19.0
14.8
20.9
21.6
11.8
15.9
15.0
168
-------
TABLE 13B* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHf?
0449
0450
0451'
0452
0453
0454
0455
0456
0457
0458
0459
0460
0461
0462
0463
0464
0465
0466
0467
0468
0469
0470
0471
0472
0473
0474
0475
0476
0477
0478
YEAR
1970
1969
1971
1970
1968
1971
1972
1970
1970
1967
1968
1966
1971
1969
1969
1972
1971
1972
1971
1968
1970
1972
1968
1967
1970
1968
1972
1970
1970
1967
MAKE
BUIC
BUIC
VCLK
VOLK
PONT
PLYM
FORD
DODG
TOYO
CHEV
PLYM
DODG
DATS
DODG
MERC
PLYM
LINC
VOLK
OPEL
CHEV
DGDG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
CID
455
350
97
97
350
198
429
318
71
283
318
383
97
383
429
360
460
103
116
250
383
360
429
194
351
91
402
454
250
289
HC
6.55
6.83
4.16
3.42
5.93
3.90
3.43
3.08
2.75
37.07
4.13
7.17
2.82
6.30
8.05
4.40
3.92
2.88
3.02
4.96
7.25
4.94
7.58
6.85
4.61
23.22
1.82
11.27
5.95
6.93
CO
77.1
127.7
53.5
31 .6
92.7
44.2
46.8
15.7
19.4
109.4
37.6
224.0
7.3
69.3
103.2
74.1
67.4
17.5
41.8
36.5
49.4
31.6
173.7
83.4
56.2
152.7
41 ..1
276.9
22.5
79.7
C02
627.7
472.8
329.6
331.4
450.0
399.0
673.2
536.4
329.5
423.6
495.9
594.6
274.9
507.8
724.9
601.8
690.2
358.5
389.0
405.8
717.2
583.2
654.3
406.4
529.8
235.4
635.3
525.4
437.7
499.3
NO
3.85
3.55
2.42
3.04
2.21
4.41
4.87
5.05
4.33
3«16
2.84
0.95
2.66
2.88
1.97
4.08
4.60
3.65
3«22
2.20
1.62
5.24
1.53
2.46
4.02
0«84
4.04
1.70
4.60
4.05
N02
0.89
0.83
0.30
0.51
0.39
0.95
1.78
1 .46
1.48
0.90
0.45
0.08
0.39
0.45
0.24
1.08
0.84
0.29
0.59
0.15
0.1 1
1.57
0.15
0.33
0.89
0.10
3.88
0.47
1.87
1.16
NOX
4.74
4.38
2.71
3.55
2.60
5.36
6.65
6.51
5.81
4.06
3.29
1 .03
3.04
3.33
2.21
5.16
5.44
3.95
3.81
2.35
1 .73
6.82
1.68
2.80
4.91
0.94
7.92
2.17
6.47
5.21
NOXC
5.74
5.30
3.12
3.46
2.45
4.75
5.64
5.62
4.97
3.45
3.68
1.19
3.48
3.78
2.55
6.08
6.42
4.66
4.84
3.11
1 .93
7.62
1.98
3.45
5.91
1 .17
7.25
2.07
6.12
4.78
I. CO
3.50
8.05
8.28
1.60
3.03
5.40
3.20
0.30
1.50
6.40
0.60
3.60
0.15
3.20
7.10
3.90
6.40
0.31
6.55
0.89
0.18
2.00
4.40
2.90
4.60
7.10
0.60
5.30
0.60
0.60
FUEL
ECON>
11.5
12.8
20.8
22.6
14.4
18.5
11.7
15.5
24.1
12.4
15.6
9.2
30.1
13.9
9.7
12.1
11.0
22.5
19.1
18.5
10.9
13.7
9.3
15.9
14.0
16.2
12.6
8.9
18.0
13.7
169
-------
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0501
0502
0503
0504
0505
0506
0507
0508
0509
0510
0511
0512
0513
0514
0515
0516
0517
0518
0519
0520
0521
0522
0523
0524
0525
0526
0527
0528
0529
0530
YEAR
1971
1972
1972
1972
1971
1971
1971
1971
1971
1972
1972
1970
1971
1970
1970
1970
1972
1970
1969
1972
1967
1968
1971
1971
1969
1969
1970
1966
1967
1972
MAKE
FORD
AMC
BUIC
FORD
FORD
DODG
FORD
FORD
VOLK
OLDS
FORD
OLDS
PONT
MERC
PONT
PLYM
CHEV
FORD
FORD
BUIC
VOLK
FORD
LINC
CHEV
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
CID
351
258
455
351
302
225
351
200
97
455
351
350
455
429
400
318
400
351
302
455
91
200
460
350
350
390
350
200
400
103
HC
4.70
3.56
2.14
4.62
3.16
3.01
3.19
2.44
3.28
1.64
2.09
3.54
3.22
3.92
3.86
4.67
2.68
3.59
3.81
1.89
8.86
2.27
3.24
2.87
4.87
3.97
3>44
23.50
5.38
1.96
CO
53.8
48.9
27.8
70.1
47.9
62.8
44.3
19.6
37.1
8.4
15.7
69.4
66.8
37.2
39.2
63.3
60.5
68.8
52.3
21.7
70.3
41 .0
58.9
43.2
76.5
67.5
40.9
43.1
68.3
14.6
C02
473.0
436.0
797.2
707.3
571 .1
370.1
532.3
373.2
325.6
738.2
647.3
484.2
625.4
721 .1
548.1
493.0
694.4
513.2
419.7
727.9
171.7
371 .7
712.1
542.5
483.9
491.4
462.8
344.7
516.1
377.2
NO
3.70
3-78
4.07
3.37
2.81
3-16
4.24
3.42
2.20
3.99
4.18
3.42
3.96
6-36
3.74
4.55
3.42
3.81
4.26
5.34
0.72
2.69
3.69
2.88
2.96
3.34
4.31
3*54
3.74
2.20
N02
1 .76
1.47
2.00
1.14
0.80
0.92
1 .75
1 .79
0.89
1.93
1 .43
0.93
1 .28
2.75
1.64
2.83
1.10
1.39
1.67
2.59
0.05
0.49
1.31
1.62
0.73
1.16
1 .65
1.47
1.55
0.51
NCX
5.46
5.25
6.07
4.52
3.61
4.08
5.99
5.21
3.08
5.92
5.60
4.35
5.24
9.1 1
5.38
7.38
4.52
5.21
5.93
7.93
0.77
3.18
5.00
4.51
3.68
4.49
5.97
5.02
5.29
2.71
NOXC
4.99
4.87
5.99
4.26
3.26
3.68
5.16
4.54
2.70
5.13
4.82
3.74
4.52
7.79
4.49
6.11
3.68
4.31
4.81
6.39
0.63
2.87
4.55
4.09
3.42
4.15
5.55
4.64
4.89
2.49
I .CO
6.95
5.60
1 .88
3.40
3.60
5.90
4.12
1.97
0.96
0.22
0.26
4.32
6.89
3*62
3.48
7.00
5.45
5.22
5.40
2*40
5.40
3-83
3.01
2.83
5.52
5.37
3.74
5.38
6.80
0.12
FUEL
ECON
15.5
16.9
10.5
10.7
13.5
18.6
14.5
21.6
22.5
11.7
13.1
14.7
12.0
11.2
14.3
14.6
11.1
14.0
17.3
11.6
28.6
20.0
10.9
14.3
14.3
14.6
16.5
18.2
13.9
21.8
170
-------
TABLE 13B, CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0531
0532
0533
0534
0535
C536
0537
0538
0539
0540
0541
0542
0543
0544
0545
0546
0547
0548
0549
0550
0551
0552
0553
0554
0555
0556
0557
0558
0559
0560
YEAR
1970
1968
1969
1969
1966
1972
1972
1972
1971
1972
1969
1972
1966
1968
1967
1967
1971
1972
1969
1972
1971
1972
1971
1971
1968
1970
1971
1970
1970
1972
MAKE
BUIC
PLYM
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
FORD
BUIC
DCDG
CHEV
BUIC
VOLK
PONT
MERC
CHEV
PLYM
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
CHRY
BUIC
TOYO
PLYM
OPEL
OLDS
BUIC
VOLK
CHEV
CHRY
PLYM
CID
350
273
350
302
194
318
302
350
383
307
430
97
389
302
283
318
350
350
327
400
350
120
198
116
350
455
97
350
440
360
HC
4.08
3.35
3.57
4.41
3.79
2.72
2.93
2.78
5.28
2.61
5.52
2.87
5.58
2.99
9.04
6.36
2.83
3.36
10.54
5.02
5.36
1.77
3.08
1.69
4.83
5.86
2.98
3.96
3.77
5.06
CO
54.1
37.8
63.0
54.0
67.0
39.0
5.7
45.9
112.2
23.6
82.6
38.1
64.2
22.1
119.1
129.7
39.3
38.5
187.8
110.9
67.1
18.2
66.2
41.8
72.8
115.7
37.2
62.7
23.3
107.3
CC2
518.0
441.4
508.8
506.6
356.4
484.0
489.5
614.2
534.2
560.1
527.0
365.9
546.8
414.8
432.3
434.8
568.1
640.2
443*6
593.1
554.9
374.2
334.6
401.5
537.2
538.3
288.1
492.0
602.3
561.2
NO
3.79
4.40
4.84
5.35
1.82
3.82
3.18
3.43
2.97
2.86
4.46
2.15
3.12
3.33
2.00
1.89
3.84
3.15
1.23
3.26
1.87
2.41
2.31
1.53
2.48
3.04
1.87
3.10
4.75
4.73
NC2
1 .12
1.34
1.94
2.11
0.25
1.06
1.03
1.07
0.87
0.66
1.85
0.50
0.67
1.07
0.42
0.34
0.90
0.72
0.15
0-90
0.33
0.47
0.42
0*08
0.35
0.67
0.17
0.72
0.51
1 .85
NOX
4.91
5.75
6.79
7.46
2.06
4.87
4.21
4.5O
3.83
3.53
6.31
2.65
3.79
4.40
2.42
2.23
4.74
3.87
1.38
4.16
2.20
2.88
2.74
1.61
2.83
3.70
2.04
3.82
5.25
6.57
NOXC
4.53
5.48
6.34
6.87
1.93
4.64
4.13
4.33
3.76
3.46
6.11
2.56
3.58
4.14
2.28
2.11
4.47
3.65
1.30
3.92
2.17
2.94
2.73
1.56
2.89
3.75
2.03
3.12
5.01
6.27
I. CO
1.50
1.05
7.23
4.92
4.00
3.50
1.31
2.50
7.23
2.48
7.23
2.46
0.19
1 o40
5.85
4.42
2.12
3.77
6.00
7.43
5.32
1 .78
3.82
7.06
5.22
5.08
1.11
3.82
0.15
6.50
FUEL
tCON
14.4
17.4
14.3
14.7
18.7
16. 0
17.5
12.8
12.2
14.7
13.2
20.4
13.3
19.3
13.7
13.5
13.9
12.5
11.5
11.3
13.1
21.7
19.8
18.8
13.3
12.0
24.9
14.7
13.6
11.9
171
-------
TABLE 13B, CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0561
0562
0563
0564
0565
0567
0568
0569
0570
0571
0572
0573
0574
0575
0576
0577
0578
0579
0580
0581
0583
0584
0585
0586
0587
0588
0589
0590
0591
0592
YEAR
1970
1972
1970
1969
1970
1968
1968
1972
1966
1970
1970
1966
1968
1970
1968
1972
1968
1969
1972
1969
1969
1971
1968
1970
1971
1972
1968
1971
1967
1971
MAKE
CHEV
CADI
FORD
DODG
FORD
CHEV
BUIC
DODG
CADI
VOLK
PONT
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHRY
FORD
CHEV
VOLK
FORD
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
FORD
DCDG
DCDG
BUIC
FORD
CHEV
CID
400
472
302
383
250
164
430
225
429
97
350
283
327
200
383
122
396
91
400
350
351
140
307
351
98
360
318
455
289
350
HC
5.56
0.44
3-54
10.03
3.04
7.37
4.94
2.25
6.31
3.35
3.41
6.21
6.77
2.68
5.26
2.68
7.56
3.80
3.16
5.66
2.93
6.02
4.76
3*24
5.78
3.58
4.27
3.06
5.61
2.33
CO
95.8
20.6
48.7
73.7
16.1
91 .6
52.5
32.7
145.7
41 .4
60.6
79.6
53.0
40.4
84.6
36.5
78.5
50.8
45.2
104.8
15.8
44.8
38.3
26.5
86.1
51.6
62.0
47.2
83.5
15.4
CC2
478.6
963.7
488.2
424.9
472.9
338.0
554.7
410.8
534.9
310.5
618.4
416.1
433.4
347-7
485.5
345.1
366.8
299.7
487.4
495.1
559.1
325.1
536.9
597.4
268.6
662.6
453.7
779.5
458.5
600.3
NO
2.40
2.23
2.58
3.05
5.09
1 .86
3.61
3.85
1 .69
2.41
2.93
2.86
3.41
2.31
4.23
2.52
1.34
2.00
4.50
3.50
5.04
2.13
6.06
5.08
1.57
5.65
4.65
3.48
3.58
4.13
NC2
0.47
0.36
0.53
1 .31
1 .89
0.28
0.81
1 .20
0.19
0.55
0.58
0-85
1 .48
0.36
2.1 1
0.54
0.14
0.30
2.44
1 .10
3.61
0.45
4.14
2.84
0.19
2.33
1.62
1.84
1.52
1 .82
NCX
2.87
2.59
3.11
4.36
6.98
2.14
4.42
5.05
1 .88
2.96
3.52
3.72
4.89
2.68
6.35
3.06
1 .48
2.30
6.94
4.60
8.64
2.59
10.19
7.92
1.75
7.98
6.27
5.32
5.10
5.95
NOXC
2.35
2.57
3.05
4.40
7.34
2.18
4.61
5.23
1 .96
2.57
3.02
3.12
4.20
2.34
5.57
2.70
1.29
1 .98
6.17
3.97
7.09
2.19
8.56
6.59
1 .47
6.45
5. .01
4.71
4.38
5.11
I .CO
6.60
1 .35
4.65
5.05
0.36
7.79
1.13
0.21
2.97
5.50
5.10
5.00
5.38
0.91
3.82
3.13
2.78
5.32
2.13
4.72
0.56
3.00
3.50
0.22
3.60
2.20
3-12
3.05
3.22
0.10
FUEL
ECON
13.7
8.9
15.4
15.5
17.5
17.6
13.6
18.9
11.3
23.0
12.3
15.8
16.5
21.1
14.0
21.6
17.3
22.7
15.6
13.1
15.0
21.4
14.5
13.7
21.0
11.8
15.7
10.3
14.6
14.0
172
-------
TABLE 13B* CONT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH0 YEAR
0592R 1971
0593 1968
0594 1970
0594R 1970
0595 1969
0596 1968
0597 1972
0598 1971
0598R 1971
0599 1972
0599R 1972
0600 1971
0601 1969
0602 1966
0603 1971
0604 1971
0605 1967
0606 1969
0607 1966
0608 1971
0609 1970
0610 1968
0611 1968
0612 1966
0613 1969
061 3R 1969
0614 1967
0615 1969
0616 1967
0617 1969
MAKE
CHEV
FORD
VOLK
VOLK
CADI
CHEV
MERC
OLDS
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
MERC
PONT
CHEV
TOYO
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PLYM
CADI
VOLK
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
OLDS
BUIC
PONT
CID
350
;289
97
97
472
307
400
4515
455
350
350
350
390
326
307
96
330
307
283
400
225
472
91
225
225
225
326
455
340
350
HC
2.31
3.64
2.60
2.53
2.67
4.17
2.31
3.95
3.70
3.21
3.36
4.66
3.84
10.'86
9.67
10.07
3.44
3.56
7.99
4.52
3.00
3.45
7.52
2.79
2.43
2.45
4.87
4.46
5.34
4.82
CO
17.3
38.8
38.6
38.2
45.1
56.5
14.1
98.9
92.0
57.2
56.7
68.1
58.3
117.6
48.1
173.5
26.7
36.8
54.4
64.2
53.3
20.1
81.5
28.0
44.0
46.2
65.2
49*9
112.0
75.6
CC2
586.9
51.2..2
343.8
330.7
697.5
508.8
666.1
656.5
658.5
630.8
635.7
548.3
584.3
541.3
481 .3
237.4
523.7
482.4
490.2
607.4
394.8
71 7.1
282.1
374.7
367.6
362.7
476.3
616*6
492.5
571.2
NO
4.33
4.31
2.88
3.01
5.32
4.56
5.66
4.24
4.35
3.61
3.79
3.20
6.12
3.52
3 . 42
0.42
3.45
4.28
3.68
3.25
4.68
6.26
1.80
4.47
3.75
3.53
4.33
5.69
2.90
4.95
NC2
1.46
1 .69
0.80
0.62
3.04
2.08
3. .15
1 .95
2.31
1 .22
1.21
1.23
2 . 70
1.06
1.12
0.02
1*00
1.55
1.40
0.99
1.94
3*58
0.43
2.18
1.18
1.52
1.78
2.55
0.61
3.42
NCX
5.79
6.01
3 . 68
3.63
8 .36
6 . 64
8 .81
6.20
6.66
4.83
5.00
4.42
8.82
4.58
4.54
0>44
4.45
5.83
5.08
4.24
6.61
9.84
2.24
6.65
4.93
5.05
6.11
8.24
3.51
8.37
NOXC
4.90
5.17
3.12
3.07
7.18
5.50
7.40
5.13
5.54
3.96
3.96
3.63
7.30
3.71
3.70
0.36
3.75
5.05
4.32
3.69
5.59
8.48
1.86
5.54
3.65
4.18
5.05
6.86
2.79
7.43
I. CO
0.11
2.13
2.66
2 . 76
2.00
3.40
0.10
7.26
7.10
5.32
5.30
7.55
4.10
6.03
1.33
2.45
0.42
2.13
0.10
2.92
0.80
0.17
7.30
1.33
1 .78
1.90
6.00
1.40
4.20
3.52
FUEL
ECON
14.2
1.5.2
21.5
22.2
11.4
14.5
12.8
10.8
10.8
12.1
12.0
13.2
12.9
11.7
15.1
16.4
15.4
16.1
14.8
12.3
18.2
11.7
20.4
20.8
20.0
20.0
14.9
12.5
12.9
12.6
173
-------
-... -.•••; TABLE 13B* CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1975. FEDERAL -TESCT PROCEDURE
VEH0
0619
0620
0621
0622 .
0623
0623R
0624
0624R
0625
0626
0627
0627R
0628
0628R
0629
0630
0631
0632
0633
0634
0635
0636
0636R
0637
0638
0639
0640
0641
0642
0643
YEAR
1968
1972
1968
197.1
1967
1967
1972
1972
1972
1970
1968
1968
1970
1970
1970
1967
1969
1968
1967
1970
1966
1966
1966
1967
1966
1971
1966
1972
1967
1969
MAKE
FORD •
CHEV
PCNT
CHEV
FORD
FCRD
FORD
FORD
CHEV
FORD
PCNT
PONT
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
CHRY
CHEV
AMC
CHEV
DCDG
FORD.
FCRD
FORD
MERC
MERC
PLYM
VCLK
PONT
CHEV
PCNT
CID
390
350
400
350
390
390 .
351
351
402
302
350
350
307
307
455
383
230
343
327
318
390
289
289
390
390
318
:78
350
283
400
- HC
17.84
2.44
29.24
3.82
,6.36
5. .23
3.06
3. 1 1
1 .21
3.34
3.81
3.55
3.72
3.37
5.66
4.28
9.41
5.76
15.23
6.74
34.02
7.50
6.68
- 7.26
31.01
3.22
5.73
4.06
5.32
3.46
CO .- •
60.6.
, 30.9..
45.4
-39.9
77. .1
61.1.
-33.0 ...
. 36.3.
27.3
.18.4-
54.6
52.2
28.2
25-5
80.7
. 51.7
31.5
94.8.
128.6
48.6.
, 64 . 3
104.8
78.9
66.7
58.3 .
53.3
84.4
56.5 '
•-' .61.4 •'.
35.6 ,
CC2
476.5
600.0
526.6
533.5
558.1
537.2
771 .0
755.5
703.5
588.9
572.1
546-1
516.1
502.2
643.0
635.8
464.2
447 . 1
404.9
584.7
534.5
520.8
479.3
619.4
562.0
505.6
274.5
583.4
470 . 4
553.0
NO .
3.90
2.90
3.87
4.10
5.02
4.99
4.35
4.37
3.38
3.89
5.12
5.25
5.49
4.56
5.09
2.78
3.25
1.94
2.65
5.22
5.27
3.67
3*44
7.55
3.93
3.81
1.74
3.01
3.50
4.58
NC2
1 .86
0.98
1 .86
1 .86
2.72
2.69
2.34
2.15
1.13
1 .66
3.58
3.01
2.62
2.91
2.51
0.69
1.02
0.30
0.80
1.98
3.27
1 .34
1 .11
4.73
2.47
1.77
0.29
0.89
1.11
1.90
NOX
5.76
3.87
5.73
5.97
7.73
7.68
6.68
6.52
4.51
5.56
8.70
8.26
8.1 1
7.46
7.60
3.47
4.27
2.24
3.44
7.20
. 8.54
5.00
4.56
12.29
6.41
5.59
2.03
3.90
4.60
6.48
NCXC
4.94
3.13
4.77
4.83
6.54
. 6.53
5-38
5.14
3.74
4.57
7.05
6.60
6.49
5.96
5.92
2.70
3.67
2.94
2.87
6.00
7.87
4.22
3.69
10.24
5.08
4.46
1.62
3.21
3.73
5.33
I. CO
4.22
2.71
2.32
2-09
5.50
5.52
1.08
0.65
1.90
0.08
4.50
4.72
0.85
0.78
6.54
4.10
2.66
4.72
3.32
1 -50
0.60
0.96
0.80
3.02
0.20
4.80
7.80
2.46
0.60
1.13
FUEL
ECON
14.1
13.5
12.8
14.6
12.7
13.6
10.7
10.7
11.8
14.1
13.2
13.8
15.5
16.0
11.3
12.2
16.3
14.4
13.5
13.0
11.9
12.5
14.2
11.9
11.8
14.8
20.9
13.0
15.2
14.3
17U
-------
TABLE 13B, CCNT'D
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
CHICAGO
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEH#
0644
0645
0646
0648
0649
0650
0651
0652
0653
0654
0655
0656
0657
0658
0659
0660
0661
0662
0664
0665
0666
0667
0668
0669
0670
0671
0672
0673
0674
0675
YEAR
1971
1966
1968
1966
1972
1972
1970
1971
1972
1968
1966
1967
1972
1969
1969
1967
1972
1967
1972
1966
1966
1971
1969
1970
1970
1972
1970
1967
1967
1971
MAKE
MERC
OLDS
FORD
BUIC
CHEV
DATS
TCYO
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
PONT
AMC
DODG
FORD
FORD
DODG
CHEV
PLYM
AMC
DCDG
AMC
DATS
CID
400
330
289
340
140
97
116
400
350
429
283
194
429
350
318
283
350
289
455
232
361
429
200
318
230
318
304
318
290
97
HC
6.29
12.32
3.83
7.68
2.45
3.06
1.69
2.88
3.62
5.57
8.68
5.77
2.94
5.85
3.02
8.33
3.15
12.09
2.56
9.17
3.67
2.99
3.05
3.44
2.32
2.61
2.73
3.76
5.78
2.15
CO
50.7
78.3
51.6
124.1
53.4
24.3
20.5
40.0
74.2
148.8
137.4
81.6
23.9
97.6
22.8
77.6
75.6
94*6
37.2
207.6
62.5
34.0
36.6
60.0
32.9
24.4
48.4
17.3
1 13.7
10.6
CC2
581.2
484.5
443.7
407.4
351.3
319.1
321.4
587.5
568.8
628.3
425.8
350.4
685.9
488.0
556.9
428.5
651.1
470.1
860.9
320.5
298.2
632.6
419.8
539.2
346.4
536.1
534.6
540.6
464.0
346.0
NO
3.55
4.46
2.15
2.12
2.81
3.45
2.79
3.44
2.47
2.84
1.51
2.62
5.33
3.31
5.32
2.58
2.64
1.91
4.79
0.98
1.39
5.62
5-89
4.80
2.13
5.45
2.87
4.43
2.42
4.06
N02
1.20
1.91
0.49
0.45
0.75
1.20
0.63
0.91
0.37
0.53
0.21
0.53
1.77
0.98
2.36
0.86
0.40
0.40
1.46
0.05
0«15
2.37
2.63
3.04
0.52
3.08
0.83
2.44
0.51
2.19
NOX
4.75
6.36
2.64
2.57
3.56
4.64
3.42
4.35
2.84
3.37
1.72
3.14
7.09
4.28
7.68
3*44
3.05
2.31
6.25
1.03
1.54
7.99
8.52
7.84
2.65
8.53
3.69
6.87
2.93
6.25
NOXC
3.85
5.39
2.27
2.42
3.28
4.27
3.16
4.05
2.70
3.20
1 .41
3.05
6.14
4.31
7.73
3-39
3.12
2.36
6.45
0.98
1 .46
7.17
7.75
6.80
2.36
7.00
3.07
5.60
2.35
5.53
I. CO
1.50
4.72
2.86
7.23
7.80
3.42
0.20
1.45
5.70
6.50
4.80
8-10
1 .54
4.62
0.75
1.50
3.40
4.42
3.12
2.68
2.61
2.46
3.34
6.60
2.95
1 .50
5.70
0-12
4.30
0.33
FUEL
ECON
13.0
13.7
16.5
14.2
20.0
24.2
24.7
13.5
12.7
10.1
13.3
17.9
12.1
13.5
14.7
15.4
11.4
13.5
9.6
13.1
21.8
12.8
18.2
13.8
21.9
15.2
14.3
15.3
13.4
24.0
175
-------
TABLE Ik
EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS AND FUEL ANALYSIS
DENVER
SHED TEST PROCEDURE
DIURNAL — HOT SOAK-
ENCL INT. HC ENCL INT. HC
VEH* TIME TEMP TEMP (QMS) TIME TEMP TEMP (QMS) RVP
DISTILLATION TEMPERATURES
H/C IBP 5| 10% 15% 20| 30% 1*0% 50% 90% FBP
0005
0020
0030
0098
0102
0110
Olll*
0120
0128
0132
0136
0136R
Oli*i»
011*5
Oli»6
0178
0186
0188
0195
0197
0197R
0198
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
73.0
76.0
7U. 0
73.0
71.0
71.0
73.0
73.0
76.0
72.0
69.0
68.0
70.0
72.0
72.0
69.0
77.0
80.0
75.0
76.0
73.0
77.0
85.0
81*. 0
83.0
81.0
83.0
85.0
8U. 0
86.0
8U.O
83.0
8U. 0
83.0
83.0
83.0
81*. 0
81*. 0
85.0
83.0
85.0
85.0
85.0
84. 0
12.0
22.9
18.3
15.9
32.0
9.9
25.6
13.1
11.8
0.6
29.0
28.6
29.6
8.5
3U. 6
0.5
25.1*
15.8
3.9
20.0
21.2
19.6
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
82.0
83.0
86.0
83.0
83.0
87.0
8U. 0
79.0
86.0
82.0
80.0
81.0
81.0
76.0
86.0
75.0
83.0
87.0
86.0
87.0
8i*. 0
83.0
91*. 0
81*. 0
98.0
90.0
91.0
95.0
89.0
90.0
91.0
89.0
87.0
90.0
90.0
88.0
91.0
- 83.0
103.0
10<*.0
93.0
96.0
92.0
93.0
6.U
11.8
31*. 5
31.1*
18.2
20.1
7.7
10.5
8.8
6.3
21.9
23.0
ll.i*
12.8
16.1*
O.I*
23.8
1U. 6
10.0
16.6
7.9
1.0
8.7
8.1*
8.1*
9.7
9.5
9.1*
9.5
9.2
9.1
8.7
8.8
8.7
9.0
9.0
8.5
9.1
8.2
7.8
8.1*
8.5
7.8
7.7
2.20
2.23
2.1U
2.21
2.27
2.21*
2.27
2.26
2.31
2.39
2.36
2.36
2.38
2.30
2.36
2.25
2.25
2.36
2.17
2.11*
2.22
2.19
82.U
82.1*
82.1*
82.1*
82.t*
77.0
78.8
79.7
78.8
78.8
78.8
91.1*
77.0
89.6
85.8
91.1*
102.2
98.6
89.6
107.6
96.8
89.6
121
122
122
111*
111*
116
116
118
120
122
125
122
120
120
120
122
129
128
127
129
133
131
136
138
139
127
127
129
129
135
133
135
136
138
131*
135
136
136
1U1
1<*0
11*1
11*2
li*8
1U8
151*
156
155
136
138
1U2
11*0
11*1*
11*5
11*9
1U9
152
1U9
11*8
11*8
1U9
153
153
151*
15U
163
162
168
170
170
11*7
11*8
161
152
151*
159
161
161
165
162
163
161
162
165
165
167
165
178
171*
192
193
193
17U
172
178
175
177
181
18U
182
186
185
185
183
185
187
187
189
187
196
201
209
208
208
192
193
201
19>*
197
199
201
200
203
201
202
201
201
20U
206
205
205
211
213
221
221
220
211
208
217
210
212
215
216
211*
217
216
215
21<*
216
217
210
221
219
226
225
31*3
3U7
3i«l*
313
311
316
315
311*
32>*
320
313
321
317
319
318
321
311
311
321*
318
322
320
360
356
356
31*2
331*
327
327
330
336
331
331*
330
329
325
331
331
317
321*
321*
328
336
333
------- |