APTD-1505
August 1973
A STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM 1966-1972
LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES
IN LOS ANGELES
AND ST. LOUIS
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
An* Arbor, Michigan 48105
-------
APTD-1505
A STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM 1966-1972
LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES
IN LOS ANGELES
AND ST. LOUIS
Prepared by
Automotive Environmental Systems, Inc.
7300 Bolsa Avenue •
Westminister, California 92683
Contract No. 68-01-0456
EPA Project Officer: John T. White III
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
August 1973
-------
The APTD (Air Pollution Technical Data) series of reports is issued by the
Office of Air and Water Programs, U. S ." Environmental Protection Agency,
to report technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies
of APTD reports are available free of charge to Federal Employees, current
contractors and grantees, and non-profit organizations - as supplies permit
- from the. Air Pollution Technical Information Center, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Parl<;, North Carolina 27711, or may
be obtained, for a nominal cost, from the National Technical Information
Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
Virginia 22151. '
This report was furnished to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
by Automotive Environmental Systems, Inc. in fulfillment of Contract
Number 68-01-0456. The-opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed
are those of the author and not necessarily those of th Environmental
Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is not to be
considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication Number APTD-1505
. 11
-------
ABSTRACT
A comprehensive study of exhaust and evaporative emissions from
light duty vehicles was performed in Los Angeles, California; and St. Louis,
Missouri, to determine the contribution to atmospheric pollution by 1966 through
1972 model year vehicles. This study was part of a. total effort to measure the
emissions from light duty vehicles in six cities. Automotive Environmental Systems,
Inc., under contract to the Environmental Protection Agency, performed exhaust
emissions tests on 170 vehicles in Los Angeles, California; and St. Louis,
Missouri, and evaporative emissions tests on twenty 1972 model year vehicles in
Los Angeles, California. These tests determined the levels of hydrocarbons,
carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxides of nitrogen exhaust emissions as well
as hydrocarbon evaporative emissions.
Vehicles were tested for exhaust emissions using the 1975 Federal
Test Procedure. This allowed calculation and presentation of results by both the
1972 and 1975 procedures. Evaporative emissions were measured using the Sealed
Housing for Evaporative Determinations technique in general accordance with
procedures stipulated in SAE Technical Report J171.
111
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
! Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION 2-1
.2.1 .Program Objective ; 2-1
2.2 Program Design 2-2
2.3 Test 'Vehicle Procurement 2-4
2.3'. 1 Selection Procedure ; 2-4
2,3.2 Test Vehicle. Handling , .. 2-9
"• 2. 4 ^Facilities § Equipment . 2-11
2.4.1 Test Locations . . . 2-11
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler 2-11
2.4.3 Exhaust Analysis Console 2-14
.2.4.4 SHED § Fuel Conditioning Cart 2-18
"2. '4.5 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases 2-18
.2.4.6 Chassis Dynamometer . 2-20
2.4.7 Miscellaneous Equipment 2-20
2.5 .Equipment Qualification, Calibration and Crosscheck 2-22
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler ' 2-22
2.5.2 Exhaust Analysis Console ' 2-24
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer 2-26
2.5.4 Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED) 2-26
2.6 Test Procedures . 2-30
2.6.1 Vehicle and Equipment Preparation 2-30
2.6.2 Federal Exhaust Emissions Testing Procedures 2-31
2.6.3 , Evaporative Emissions Test Procedure 2-33
2..6.4 ; Daily Test Schedule 2-36
2.7 Data Handling 2-39
2.7.1 Data Collection 2-39
2.7.2^ Data Processing 2-48
2.7.3J /Calculation of Results 2-48
i (''2.7.3.1 Exhaust Emissions 2-48
; | f| 2.7.3.2 Evaporative Emissions ' 2-50
'
13. 1 Vehie-i'e Information Summary 3-2
; "1 .!-W '•• '
• •'' - i-!|-.:' ;|
3.2 -V^ehi-ple^ Exhaust Emissions Results 3-13
." ' • ' \ ' - .i':v,.- •'.'
3.3; 'VeM»e»le Evaporative Emissions Results 3-29
n I '-aifh' f
iv
-------
1-1
1. INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recognized the
problem of air pollution due to motor vehicles and has assigned a high priority
to the control and measurement of emissions from light duty vehicles. In addition
to establishing emissions control standards, to which all new vehicles manufactured
must comply, the EPA has maintained an ongoing effort to survey emissions from
"on-the-road" vehicles. This ongoing effort is to develop and update accurate
emissions factors which quantify the exact contribution to atmospheric pollution
by light duty vehicles. Once emissions factors are known and the proper segment
of the air pollution inventory is assigned to motor vehicles, the effectiveness
of current emissions control strategies can be established and updated. The
acquisition of this information on a continuing basis will assist the EPA in
evaluating control strategies with respect to control results. Furthermore,
emissions factors information will assist in the prediction of serious air
pollution episodes in densely populated areas.
In 1971, the EPA sought to precisely assess the light duty vehicle's
contribution to atmospheric pollution in six metropolitan areas using the latest
emissions measurement technology. These new techniques accurately quantified
the true amounts of pollutants entering the atmosphere from light duty motor
vehicles. The six cities selected were representative of some of the most
populated areas in the United States as well as the most diverse areas in terms
of climate and terrain--Los Angeles representing the temperate, warm and sunny
western portion of the United States and Denver, at a one mile altitude, represen-
tative of the mountainous metropolitan areas. Chicago was selected to represent
the Great Lakes and northeast region of the United States, typical of cities
with long winter seasons. St. Louis and Houston were selected as representing
the typical extremes in the Great Plains area with St. Louis experiencing rather
moderate winters and Houston normally having a very warm, but also a very humid
climate. The sixth city selected was Washington, D.C., typical of the many cities
on the Eastern Seaboard.
The Environmental Protection Agency sought, in 1972, to update
the light duty vehicle pollution inventory on 1966 through 1972 model year vehicles
-------
1-2 ,
in six cities and awarded the contract "Light Duty Vehicle Surveillance Program
Fiscal Year 1972 (Los Angeles and St. Louis)" to Automotive Environmental Systems,
Inc. The description and results of this program for these two of the six cities
are presented in this final report.
-------
2-1
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
The overall objective of. "A Study of Emissions From 1966 through
1972 Light Duty Vehicles in Six Cities" was to gather accurate exhaust and
evaporative emissions data which are statistically representative of the nation's
vehicle population. These data will be used to develop average emissions factors
v
which precisely define emissions characteristics from light duty vehicles in the
United States. The average emissions factors are to be used by the National
Air Data Branch (NADB) and the Land Use Planning Branch (LUPB) of the United
States Environmental Protection Agency, to determine the contribution of light
duty vehicles to the national air pollution inventory. These factors will enable
NADB to project vehicle emissions levels which may be used in metropolitan areas
to anticipate pollution episodes or to assist in the evaluation of pollution control
strategies such as transportation control. In addition, this program will update
vehicle exhaust emissions data on 1966 through 1971 model year vehicles and
provide exhaust and evaporative emissions data on 1972 model year light duty
vehicles.
-------
2-2
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN
In support of the broad objective of this program to accumulate
evaporative and exhaust emissions data which will provide an accurate measure
of the automobile's contribution to the nation's emissions inventory, several
subordinate objectives had to be fulfilled. The first, and perhaps most important,
was to ensure that the sample from which vehicle emissions data was obtained was
statistically representative of the nationwide population. This task was accom-
plished by testing a statistically representative sample of vehicles in six cities
located across the United States. Three contractors were selected by the Environ-
mental Protection Agency to perform these tests. General Environments Corporation
tested vehicles in Washington, D.C., and Automotive Testing Laboratories performed
emissions testing in Denver, Colorado; Houston, Texas; and Chicago, Illinois.
In this program, AESi tested vehicles in Los Angeles, California, representative
of the warm and sunny western portion of the United States; and in St. Louis,
Missouri, typical of the Great Plains area of the United States.
Another important consideration in support of the overall program
objective was the proper selection of test vehicles, model years 1966 through
1972. The 1972 model year vehicles were tested to generate exhaust and evapora-
tive emissions data and the 1966 to 1971 vehicles were tested to up-date data
generated in last year's program. In any statistical sampling program, there
is always concern about the statistical validity of the sample. A careful
delineation of the various vehicle makes, engine sizes, transmissions and car-
buretion types was obtained, and a desired national test vehicle sample was
developed by the Surveillance Branch, Office of Air § Water Programs, of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
Another important consideration in support of the program objective
was the orderly accumulation of precise test data. Therefore, precision test
equipment, well defined procedures, and rigorous qualification, calibration
and cross check techniques were used in the program.
In order to accumulate accurate exhaust and evaporative emissions
test data from the vehicle sample, techniques which measure the true polluting
characteristics of vehicles were required. The constant volume sampling
-------
2-3
technique as specified in the 1972 and 1975 Federal Test Procedures was used
to measure the pollution characteristics of the test vehicles.
The evaporative emissions test procedure used for testing in Los
Angeles was the Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED) technique.
This technique consists of placing the car in an enclosure and measuring the
concentration of evaporated hydrocarbons in the atmosphere within the enclosure.
-------
2-4
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
2.3.1 Selection Procedure
The objective of the test vehicle procurement task was to obtain
test vehicles of the appropriate make, model and age which are representative
of the nation's vehicle population. To satisfy this goal, AESi used a
selection procedure for choosing the vehicles for the program test fleet.
The selection procedure is depicted in Figure 2.3-1.
For each of the two cities, an nth-name sample of 1966 through
1972 automobiles registered in the test locations (as defined by postal zip
codes) was obtained from R. L. Polk and Company. The nth-name sampling
technique used by Polk results in the selection of a random sample by select-
ing the vehicles whose owners reside at every nth street address within the
sample area, where:
X
n = -y ; where X = Total number of vehicle owners per city
and Y = Sample size
The randomly selected names for each city were submitted to AESi
on magnetic tape--10,000 for Los Angeles and 5,000 for St. Louis.
A subsample of vehicles which best fits the national vehicle popu-
lation profile of make, model year and number of engine cylinders was selected
for each city. Later this list was reduced to those vehicles which best fit
the vehicle matrix furnished by the Office of Air § Water Programs of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency. The subsample as selected by the computer was printed out
in the format shown in Figure 2.3-2.
A mailing consisting of & letter and a postage-paid return card
as shown in Figures 2.3-3 and 2.3-4 was sent to each of the vehicle owners
selected in the subsample. The aura of "junk mail" was minimized by typing
names and addresses of the selected vehicle owners on the letters and
envelopes.
-------
2-5
Develop Strategy for Test
Fleet Selection, Procurement
and Logistics
Prepare Mailing
Materials
* Letter S Envelope
* Brochure
* Return Envelope
Design Random Vehicle
Selection Program
* Initial Elimination
* Random Selection Routine
* Other Selection Criteria
Obtain Registration List
by Test Location
* Make
* Model
* Year
* Owner
* Address
* Zip Code
IT-
[Select Initial Sample|
Send Mailing to Selected Vehicle
Owners by First Class Mail
Follow Up Mailing to
Maximize Response
* Phone Calls
* Personal Visits
* Other
Quantitatively Evaluate Response
Clarify as Needed. Review for:
* Mileage, Age * Other
Set Up On-Site File For
Keeping Records of
Every Vehicle
Set Up Home Office File
For Keeping Records of
Every Vehicle
Select Test Fleet by "fitting" Test
Vehicles as Closely as Possible to
Proportions of National Vehicle
Population Characteristics Using
This Hierarchy of Criteria:
* CID, Carburetion
* Transmission
* Year
* Make
Compatible with Our Needs?
If so, List.
Perform Test Vehicle
Logistics Function
* Pick up and Return
* Agreements with Owner
* Scheduling Considerations
* Loan Cars
* Remuneration to Owner
* Other
Figure 2.3-1 Vehicle Procurement Flow Diagram
-------
lOiOOO LOS ANGELES CARS, BY MAKE AND YEAR
SEQQ-r NAME
28 MR. L P CITRON
29 MR. IB COOPER
30 MR. J D BURDEN
31 MS. J M BRILES
32 MR. A GRIFFIN
31..._.M.R.. L J ORESSLER
E DEAS
W. H E5SERMAN
MR. J J KUBINA
HR. J J LEHMANN
MR. "M JONES
ADDRESS
3361 MC LAUGHLIN AV
LOS ANGELES CA 90066
6022 PICO BL
LOS ANGELES
1428 225T.H ST
TORRANCE
6 MIDOLERIOGE LN
PLS VRD PNS
JR 704 111TH ST
LOS ANGELES
32653 SEA GATE OR
PLS VRD PNSI
6329 10TH AV
LOS ANGELES
1200 HOOSTER ST
LOS ANGEtES
17035 YUKON AV
TORRANCE
643 8TH ST
SAM PeORQ
509 PEACH ST
COMPTON
3515_
LOS
30327 VIA
_ PLS
6600 BEACHVIEU OR
PLS VRD PNSL
325 139TH ST
LOS ANGELES
1126 109TM PL
LJQS A9SELES
4627 6TH AV
LOS ANGELES
1507 GUNLOCK ST
COHPTOW
916 THORSON AV
COMPTON
3663 STONER AV
LOS ANGELES
1559 CARDIFF AV
LOS ANGELES
JR 3801 PIRATE OR
PLS VRD PUSLA
4005 VIA GAVILAN
PLS VRD PNSLA C
3704 VIGILANCE DR
PLS VRD PNSLA C
3372 CABRILLO BL
LOS ANGELES
3310 76TH ST
LOS ANGELES
317 83RO S.T
LOS ANGELES
HFGR MODEL CYL COST TRANS CARB CID
BUICK BUI 8 3
CA
CA
LN
CA
CA
DR
CA
c&
T
CA
CA
.CA.
CA
OR
CA
CA
..CA.
CA
T
CA
CA
CA
V
CA
.CA
AN
CA
DR
CA
8L
CA
CA
CA
90035
90501
90274
90044
90274
90043
3
90035
3
90904
«731
90222
90274
90061
:94044
90043
90229
90221
90066
90035
90274
90274
90274
90066
90043
90003
71
..71
71
71
71
71
.71
r
'-71
£.'!
t.JJ
_ '-L
71
.1
71
i
171
sL_r'
71
j
'.71
h
[ 71
i
' 71
71
I
71
" 71
.71
\
j 71
^
71
-
71
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
. BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
._BU_ICK
BUICK
"BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
. BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
BUI
~§°J-
631
BUI
BUI
RIV
_,_
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
RIV
SPL
SPL
SPL
SPL
SPL
SPL
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
B
8
8
§
8
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
_4
4
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
-------
FORM APPROVED
FORM NO. 4505-1 OMB No. 158-S-72033
ca
-------
FILL OUT. TEAR OFF
AND RETURN
POSTCARD TODAY!
REPLY
No Postage Stamp Necessary If Mailed In The United States
Postage will be paid by
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Vehicle Emissions letting Laboratory
7300 Bolsa Avenue
Westminster, Ca. 92683
Form No. 4505-Z
Yes, I am willing to volunteer my car for pollution testing Q
Make of car
Year
Model
My car's engine displacement is.
Serial Number.
.cubic inches
(Obtain from vehicle registration)
Carburetor: 1 barrel D 2 barrel D
4 barrel D Fuel Inj. D
Transmission: Automatic D Manual D
Current mileage on my car is
Name
Street No.
City
Zip Code.
Form Approved
OMB No. 158-S-72033
Vol. No.
FILL IN IF
YOU HAVE THIS
INFORMATION
Bus. Phone No..
Res. Phone No..
Best time to call.
COMPANY USE ONLY
Contact Date.
FILL OUT, TEAR OFF
AND RETURN
POSTCARD TODAY!
-------
2-9
Concurrently with the mailing, AESi obtained the telephone numbers
of all selected vehicle owners whose numbers were listed. Approximately one
week after the mailing, AESi began to call and encourage all selected vehicle
owners with listed telephone numbers to participate in the program. In some
cases, selected vehicle owners were visited personally by the procurement
specialists to obtain their cooperation. Also concurrently with the mailings,
local newspapers and selected special interest groups were alerted about the
program and encouraged to publicize it with the objective of encouraging selected
vehicle owners to whom the mailings had been sent to submit the postage-paid
cards to AESi.
After maximizing the response to the mailings, all selected vehicle
owners who were willing to participate in the program were listed and resubmitted
for a second level computerized selection. Based upon the additional vehicle
parameters of cubic inch displacement, transmission type and carburetor type,
as well as the original parameters of make and model year, AESi selected from
the candidates those vehicles which best conformed to the EPA-furnished national
vehicle population profile.
AESi personnel then contacted the owners of the selected vehicles
and asked them to deliver their vehicles to the laboratory in accordance with
the testing schedule. If the selected vehicle subsequently became unavailable
for one reason or another, a spare vehicle was substituted for the initially
selected vehicle. Advertising and other strategies were used in a limited
number of instances to obtain certain hard-to-find models.
2.3.2 Test Vehicle Handling
Test vehicles were scheduled for testing at each of the laboratories
in accordance with the respective laboratory work load and manpower capabilities.
Accordingly, the scheduling of test vehicles was a critical task, especially
since the vehicle owners were relied upon to deliver their vehicles to the
laboratories. Arrangements were made with the owners of the candidate vehicles
several days in advance, and the owners were again reminded of the appointments
one day prior to the scheduled time of delivery.
-------
2-10
Virtually all of the participants required loan cars while their
cars were being tested. AESi arranged for the provision of such loan cars
with full insurance in accordance with contractual requirements, through the
services of Dollar-A-Day Rent A Car. From the standpoint of the rental car fleet
at each test facility, scheduling was especially important, since each parti-
cipant expected to be provided a rental car expeditiously upon his arrival at
the laboratory. Unless a participant from the previous day had returned a rental
car well in advance of the new participant's arrival, the new participant either
had to wait for the arrival of a rental car, or additional cars had to be provided.
In the interest of expediting the program and making it as convenient as possible
for the participants, AESi chose to have additional loan cars on hand to ensure
the immediate availability of loan cars for all participants delivering their test
vehicles to the laboratory.
Each candidate in the program signed two documents in conjunction
with the exchange of vehicles. The first document was a test agreement which
absolved the participant of all liability relating to his vehicle while in the
possession of AESi. The second document indemnified the participant from any
liability arising from the use of the loan car.
To encourage participation, incentives were provided to each vehicle
owner. The participant was supplied a free, fully-insured loan car while his
car was being tested, and a $25 U.S. Savings .Bond. These incentives generally
proved ample to obtain vehicle owners' cooperation. At the Westminster laboratory,
an additional $10 reward was offered to encourage people to deliver their vehicle
to the laboratory when they refused to participate because of the inconvenience.
This reward was accepted by ten participants who were in close proximity to the
laboratory. For those vehicle owners who were more than 25 miles away this additional
reward provided no additional incentive.
-------
2-11
2.4 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
2.4.1 Test Locations
Test facilities were established in the metropolitan areas of Los
Angeles and St. Louis. In accordance with contractual requirements, both of
the facilities were located within 10 miles of the metropolitan areas. Easy
accessibility by the program participants was considered in selection of the
specific locations. The address and elevation above mean sea level of each
facility follows:
Los Angeles
7300 Bolsa Ave.
Westminster, California 92683
50 feet
St. Louis
10723 Indianhead Blvd.
St. Louis, Missouri 63132
400 feet
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler
The equipment described in this section was designed and built in
accordance with requirements stipulated in pertinent issues of the Federal
Register for performing vehicle emissions tests in accordance with the 1972
through 1975 Federal Test Procedures. An AESi-designed and fabricated Constant
Volume Sampler was utilized in each city. Each of these constant volume samplers
features a specially designed gas-to-water heat exchanger and temperature
control circuit which allows for precise control of the sample temperature.
Inlet pressure depression is adjusted by a precision butterfly valve enabling
inlet pressure adjustments to within plus or minus 0.05 inches of water.
Blower speed is maintained at a constant 1,125 revolutions per minute by the
use of a constant speed motor. Blower revolutions are counted by the use of
a magnetic pickup and an electronic counter. All function controls are push
.button operated giving a confirming visual indication when each particular
function is being performed. Table 2.4-1 lists the performance specifications
of AESi's constant volume sampler. Listed on the left are the specifications
as itemized under Section 85.073-20 of the Federal Register, and on the right
the performance specifications of AESi's constant volume sampler.
-------
2-12
AESi Constant Volume Sampler - Performance Specifications
SPECIFICATION
AESi CVS PERFORMANCE
Must have two particulate filters
plus one charcoal filter with a
total pressure drop of less than
1" H20.
0.3" -
6.
7.
8.
9.
Tailpipe pressure within ±1"
during driving cycle with CVS and
without CVS.
Preheater to bring CVS within
±10°F of set point prior to test
startup.
A heat exchanger to maintain set
point within ± 10°F during the
Federal Test cycle.
A positive displacement pump of 300
to 350 CFM capacity calibrated per
Appendix III.
Temperature sensor within ± 2°F
allowing continuous recording.
Gauge (Gl) with accuracy of ±3mm Hg..
Gauge (G2) with accuracy of ±3mm Hg.
Sample probes (SI and S2)
10. Filters (Fl and F2)
11. Pumps (PI and P2)
12 § 13. Flow control valves (Nl and
N2) and flowmeters (FL1 and FL2)
to ensure constant sample flow.
14. Three-way solenoid valves (VI and
V2)
15. Quick connect leak tight-fittings
(Cl and C2) to connect sample bags
to CVS, EAC, purge cylinder and
evacuation pump.
0.4" HO Drop
+0.0" -0.55"H20 as measured with a
350 CID Chevelle during the first
250 seconds of the Federal cycle.
The static pressure tap was located
3-1/2" from the end of the tailpipe.
± 2°F
± 5°F
Sutorbilt 5LV running at 1125 RPM,
producing approximately 343 CFM.
See calibration section for calibra-
tion information.
± 2°F
± 0.2 mm Hg
± 0.2 mm Hg
Five specially designed probes (SI, S2,
continuous SI and S2 plus raw exhaust)
Fl and F2
Stainless steel Metal Bellows pumps
(PI and P2) plus 1 to 3 additional
pumps for other purposes.
Flowmeters (FL1 and FL2) with integral
valves (Nl and N2) plus, in some
cases, flow control pressure regulators.
Stainless steel Skinner 3-way valves
(VI and V2)
Specially designed leak-tight pneumatic
system using solenoid and/or rotary
valves to perform sample and bag manage-
ment without any fittings or make/break
operations. This facilitates rapid and
accurate sample analysis.
TABLE 2.4-1
-------
2-13
TABLE 2.4-1 (Cont.)
16. Sample collection bags of sufficient
capacity.
17. A revolution counter for pump
revolutions.
Four large sample bags made of Tedlar.
These bags can be analyzed, evacuated,
purged and re-evacuated in alternate
pairs such that the 1975 procedure
calling for six samples can be per-
formed with four bags.
Two revolution counters electrically
latched to the sample solenoid valves.
As a backup the elapsed time of each
test phase is recorded. The blower is
driven by a synchronous motor such that
blower RPM is constant. Thus; N = ET(RPM)
-------
2-14
2.4.3 Exhaust Analysis Console (EAC)
The exhaust analysis consoles used during the performance of this
program were designed in accordance with specifications stipulated in various
Federal Registers for vehicle emissions testing by the 1972 and 1975 Federal
Test Procedures. The features specified in the 1975 Federal Test Procedure for
drying the sample gas and removing carbon dioxide from the carbon monoxide sample
train were not included. These were not of practical importance at the higher
emissions levels encountered. The instruments used in the exhaust analysis
consoles were the Beckman Model 315A or 315B Nondispersive Infrared Analyzers
(NDIR's) for the measurement of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. The carbon
monoxide instrument featured a stacked sample cell configuration and three-range
amplifier. The carbon dioxide analyzer contained the standard 1/8 inch sample
cell with a three range amplifier. Table 2.4-2 lists the performance specifications
of the AESi Exhaust Analysis Consoles.
In addition to the specifications described in Table 2.4-2, which
satisfy EPA specifications, the AESi Exhaust Analysis Consoles contain the
following items:
1. Ability to analyze continuous dilute and raw undilute exhaust
gas and collect expelled analyzer gases for return to the
AESi CVS. (Raw undilute sample is expelled into the CVS
before dilution air is mixed with exhaust gases.) The obvious
benefit is continuous analysis of vehicle operation which can
be achieved without affecting the collection and analysis of
any bag sample.
2. Three to four calibration gas inlet ports per instrument to
facilitate instrument curve development and calibration results.
3. Large selection of full scale ranges available for each
instrument.
A Beckman Model 400 Flame lonization Detector (FID) was utilized
to measure total hydrocarbons. Each of the Model 400 Flame lonization Detectors
was operated with a 40% hydrogen/60% nitrogen fuel mixture and special capillary
to minimize the oxygen effect.
The Thermo Electron Corporation Model 10A Chemiluminescence Analyzer
was used for the measurement of NO and NOx. This instrument was equipped with
-------
2-15
AESi Exhaust Analysis Console - Performance Specifications
SPECIFICATION
AESi EAC PERFORMANCE
1. Quick-connect, leak-tight fitting (C3)
to attach sample bags to analytical
system.
2. Filter (F3) to remove any residual
particulate matter from the collected
samples.
3. Pump (P3)
4. Selector valves (V3, V4 and V5)
5. Flow control valves to regulate the
gas flow rates.
6. Flowmeters (FL3, FL4 and FL5)
7. Manifold to collect expelled gases
from each analyzer.
8. Pump (P4) to transfer expelled gases
to a vent external to the test room
(optional).
9. Analyzers to determine hydrocarbon,
carbon monoxide and oxides of
nitrogen concentrations.
10. An oxides of nitrogen converter to
convert any N02 present in the
samples to NO before analysis.
11. Selector valves (V6 and V7) to allow
gases to bypass the converter.
12. Recorders (Rl, R2 and R3).
Specially designed leak-tight system
using solenoid valves to manage sample
and background bag analysis without
disturbing system fittings or seals.
Three filters are used: One filter
for the FID instrument; one filter for
the NOX instrument; and one filter for
both the CO and C02 NDIR instruments.
Three sample pumps are used aligned in
the same manner as described above for
the filters.
Selector valves and solenoid selector
valves.
Flow control valves and sample by-pass
flow control valves.
Four flowmeters, one for each instru-
ment and sample by-pass flowmeters.
Manifold to collect expelled gases.
Pump not necessary. Expelled gases
are vented to outlet side of the CVS
positive displacement pump, which is
exhausted external to the test facility.
Analyzers to determine hydrocarbon,
carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen
and carbon dioxide concentrations.
An oxides of nitrogen converter to
convert any N02 present in the samples
to NO before analysis.
Stainless steel solenoid selector
valves to manage bypass of the oxides
of nitrogen converter.
Two Honeywell Model 193 potentiometric
recorders were used in each EAC.
TABLE 2.4-2
-------
2-16
7 ranges from 0 to 10 through 0 to 10,000 ppm NO. A thermal converter was
employed to convert N0_ and other nitrogen oxides to NO.
Honeywell Model 193 Potentiometric Recorders were used in the exhaust
analysis console to record all instrument signal outputs. Table 2.4-3 indicates
the ranges used for each instrument.
-------
2-17
INSTRUMENT RANGES
INSTRUMENT
Hydrocarbon
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
NO and NOx
AESi RANGE NO.
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
6
2
3
5
6
NOMINAL RANGE CONCENTRATIONS
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
0 -
4
15
10
6
3
1
0
6.
4.
300 ppm
,000 ppm
,000 ppm
.0 percent
.0 percent
.0 percent
.5 percent
.5 percent
0 percent
0 percent
0
0
250 ppm
1,000 ppm
TABLE 2.4-3
-------
2-18
2.4.4 SHED and Fuel Conditioning Cart
An AESi-designed and fabricated SHED (Sealed Housing for Evaporative
Determinations) was used in Los Angeles to perform the evaporative emissions
portion of the test program. The SHED is constructed of preformed light gauge
aluminum panels providing excellent heat dissipation. Panels were bolted together
at formed flanges, and the SHED was fitted with windows, doors and a ceiling of
tautly stretched Dupont Tedlar polyvinyl fluoride film. The SHED dimensions
are 10 feet wide by 21 feet long by 8 feet high--large enough to accommodate
all standard sized automobiles. Specially designed doors seal completely upon
closing rendering the enclosure leak proof and pressure tight. Specifications
for the SHED are in agreement with all requirements stipulated in the SAE J171
Evaporative Emissions Test Procedure. A Beckman Model 400 Flame lonization
Detector was used in conjunction with the SHED to measure hydrocarbon evaporative
emissions.
The AESi Fuel Conditioning Cart used to condition test fuel was
of the same design and manufacture as those used by the Environmental Protection
Agency in the Ann Arbor facility. The fuel conditioning cart was capable of
maintaining a bulk fuel temperature of 60° or less. The fuel conditioning cart
had the capability of transferring fuel and filling or emptying vehicle tanks,
and featured an internal fuel circulate mode to expedite gasoline temperature
conditioning and to prevent temperature stratification within the tank. The
cart was fabricated in accordance with National Electric Code specifications
for equipment operated in hazardous atmospheres.
2.4.5 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases
Two complete sets of laboratory standard calibration gases were
procured by AESi. The contents of each cylinder were analyzed and concentrations
were assigned by the Office of Air § Water Programs of the Environmental Protection
Agency in Ann Arbor. Each laboratory used the standard set of gases for defining
the complete instrument calibration curves and for subsequent assigning of values
to the day-to-day "working" gases. The laboratory standard gases and their
nominal concentrations are tabulated in Figure 2.4-1.
-------
2-19
LABORATORY STANDARD CALIBRATION GASES
Instrument
AESi Range
Nominal Concentration
HC (FID)
CO (NDIR)
11
n
n
it
C02 (NDIR)
M
n
n
NOx (CL)
it
it
it
n
2
2
2
2-3
3
3
3-4
3-4
4
4
6
6
6-3
6
3
2
3
2-1
3-1
2-1
2-1
1
3
2
3
3
2
3
3-2
2
5
5
5
5-6
6
6
6
6
29.55 ppm Carbon ir
99.3 " "
200.7 " "
306.6
585.0
933.0
1,465.5 "
4,068.0 "
8,432.0
12,058.0 " " '
1,071 ppm CO in N2
2,170 '
3,150 " " " "
4,997 " " " "
8,100 " " " "
12,800 " " " "
13,100 " " " "
15,900 " " " "
'20,400 " " " "
39,100 " " " "
56,500 " " " "
91,400 " " " "
6,000 ppm C02 in N2
10,007 " " " "
14,960 " " " "
20,500 " " " "
24,800 " " " "
30,000 " " " "
38,200 " " " "
59,100 " " " "
54 ppm NO in N-
100 " " " "
176 " " " "
196 " " " "
315.75 ppm NO in N2
464.25 " " " "
626.95 " " " "
784.65 " " " "
Figure 2.4-1
-------
2-20
2.4.6 Chassis Dynamometer
A Clayton Variable Inertia Chassis Dynamometer (CE-50) equipped
with 250-pound increment inertia loading weights and low torque bridge (0-50 hp)
was utilized in each of the laboratories. The total absorption, torque and
speed measuring systems utilized in the CE-50 provide an overall accuracy within
1.0% of full scale. AESi has added a tachometer generator driven by the front
roll to the CE-50 to operate the driver's aid chart and facilitate calibration.
2.4.7 Miscellaneous Equipment
In addition to the equipment previously described, Varian driver
aids were utilized to provide driving schedules for the various driving sequences
performed during this program. An Autoscan ignition analyzer, timing lights,
tach-dwell meter, other tuneup equipment, and small tools were used as necessary.
To measure idle carbon monoxide, a Horiba Mexa 300 dual range NDIR exhaust
gas analyzer was used. The nominal concentration ranges for this instrument
are 0 - 10% and 0-2% carbon monoxide, and 0 - 400 ppm and 0 - 200 ppm hexane
equivalents.
Precise weighing of propane recovery test cylinders was accomplished
using a Sartorius Balance which can weigh up to 2.2 Kg with a resolution of 10 mg
and an accuracy of + 7 mg. The balance contains Class S weights which are
traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. For less precise measurement,
an O'Haus Scales with an accuracy of ± 50 mg was used.
Absolute pressure was measured with a Meriam Model 310EF10 Mercury
Manometer incorporating a 0.01 inch of mercury vernier scale and a thermometer.
Calibration is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards and is within
0.009 inch of mercury throughout the working range.
Temperature measurements were made with certified ASTM 64F or 50F
thermometers or pyrometers and thermometers calibrated against the ASTM thermo-
meters. Calibration is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.
For calibration of the constant volume sampler, AESi used Meriam
Model 50 MC2-6SF and Model 50 MC2-4SF laminar flow elements. Both of these
instruments have calibration curves traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.
-------
2-21
Moreover, these instruments have been operated in series such that total measurement
differences could be observed. These differences are less than 0.5%.
Instruments used to monitor the laminar flow elements include the
temperature and pressure devices listed above plus inclined manometers (Meriam
Models 40GD10 and 40 HE35) for determining the pressure drop across the laminar
flow element. The inclined manometers have calibrations which are traceable to
the National Bureau of Standards.
-------
2-22
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, CALIBRATION AND CROSS CHECK
This section describes in detail the qualification, calibration
and cross check procedures utilized by AESi and EPA technical personnel to
ensure the generation of precise emissions test data. The requirements for
system qualification was ± 2 percent overall accuracy. This requirement
encompassed the constant volume sampler, exhaust analysis console, the primary
CVS flow calibration device, and a laboratory balance. In addition the
chassis dynamometer was calibrated by the coast-down technique stipulated
in the Federal Register. The SHED for evaporative determination in Los
Angeles was qualified and calibrated in accordance with procedures stipulated
in the SAE Technical Report J171.
In addition to the initial qualifications in each of the cities,
EPA personnel supervised periodic calibrations and cross check procedures in
each city during the course of the program. No tests were performed in
either city before meeting the qualification or cross check requirements.
Throughout the course of the program, AESi maintained a schedule for daily,
weekly and monthly calibration and maintenance. This procedure included
one hour each morning, plus four hours each week, plus eight hours each
month to perform this function.
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler (CVS)
AESi's CVS's were calibrated with the laminar flow elements and
accessories (See Section 2.4.7.) by the basic procedure specified in the
Federal Register. The latest calibration procedures from EPA-CRC-sponsored
symposia were used.
In addition to measuring CVS flow at ten pressure differentials (Figure
2.5-1) using the recommended practices discussed at the Ann Arbor symposium, AESi
measured flow at several points at inlet temperatures above and below the set
point temperature. During flow testing all possible variables were measured
and accounted for. This includes an important parameter often overlooked by
others — the temperature of manometer fluid in the barometer and the inclined
manometer. Blower motor speed was verified by means of a 60 Hz strobe light.
The inlet and outlet pressures and temperatures were varied over ranges which
-------
AUTO.VOTIVC ENVIROHMCNTAL SYSTEM!. INC. DESCRIPTION '.
CVS I-LOW I LSI
3 INLET
H OUTLET
TECH *.
127+4)/TM .yTL- PL -rPp 'Tp T-59&250
H20"= (-O.OOI3S - TA°F + I3.S9!2)PA Hg"
Prj .tJo.
u
Site
Date
STEP
NO.
AP
H20"
Vo
Ft.3/ Rev.
TA
°F
PA cor H2o
AP,
H20"
M
/TM
T
D+
El-
P_A H20
PL A H20"
Pp A H20
Pp AHZ0
Tp °R
TIME
SET
READ
0.
It-f
' 00
ii.s
•2*35"
ff?,
0.
•7*
/20.3
TO
H
-------
2-24
surround and include in every dimension, the. set of conditions at which the CVS
is operated during emissions testing.
Before inviting EPA personnel to the test site for qualification,
AESi performed ten propane recovery tests in the 0 - 300 ppm carbon range to
ensure proper calibration. For inspecting EPA officers, AESi repeated propane
recovery tests to EPA's satisfaction.
Since CVS calibration is critical, continuous checks had to be
made. Propane recovery tests were performed in the 0 - 300 ppm carbon range
before testing every day. If the test was not within ± 2%, the cause of error was
determined and remedied. A propane test within ± 2% was run before testing began.
The propane test results were plotted so that any upward or downward
trend could be detected. If such a trend had developed, the CVS would have
been immediately recalibrated using a laminar flow element. The CVS was also
leak checked every day. Periodically the pyrometer, pressure gauges and other
CVS instruments were checked for calibration regardless of need indicated by
propane tests. A log book was maintained for the CVS in which all repairs, alter-
ations, calibrations and propane tests were recorded. Moreover, files were main-
tained on the CVS's in which a history of blower volume and other characteristics
was kept.
2.5.2 Exhaust Analysis Console (EAC)
Calibration and qualification of the Exhaust Analysis Console (EAC)
was performed as stipulated in the Federal Register. Some of the procedures
discussed here were performed prior to the arrival of the Project Officer.
Prerequisite to qualification of the EAC was analysis of on-site laboratory
gases by the Office of Air and Water Programs.
Items which were checked and verified prior to individual instrument
calibration were the following: 1) total EAC leak check; 2) checked zero air qual-
ity with hydrocarbon free air; 3) adjusted all analyzers to optimize performance as
specified by individual instrument manuals; 4) checked response times for all instru-
ments. The following paragraphs describe individual analyzer optimization pro-
cedures and qualification items.
-------
2-25
Hydrocarbon Analyzer (Beckman Model 400)
1. Obtain maximum sensitivity using the following method:
a. Set fuel pressure to approximately 25 psig.
b. Set air pressure to approximately 15 psig.
c. Light burner (allow 30 minutes for warmup).
d. Set sample pressure to approximately 4 psig.
e. Flow zero grade air and set zero on meter or recorder.
f. Flow mid-range calibration gas.
g. With calibration gas flowing through instrument, adjust
air pressure to obtain maximum upscale reading.
h. Adjust sample pressure to obtain maximum reading and
best response.
2. Develop instrument curves for ranges 0-300, 0-3000, and
0-15,000 ppm.
3. Verify results graphically.
Carbon Monoxide Analyzer (Beckman Model 315A or 315B)
1. Check and/or adjust instrument tuning.
2. Check and/or adjust demodulator switching pattern.
3. Check instrument response to water and 100% carbon
dioxide (CC>2) on range 2.
4. Develop instrument curves for ranges described in Section 2.4.5.
5. Verify curve results graphically.
Carbon Dioxide Analyzer (Beckman Model 315A or 315B)
1. Check and/or adjust instrument tuning.
2. Check and/or adjust demodulator switching pattern.
3. Develop instrument curves for ranges described in Section 2.4.5.
4. Verify curve results graphically.
Oxides of Nitrogen Analyzer (TECo Model 10A)
1. Verify reaction chamber pressure to be in the 5-12 torr
range.
2. Check response time through thermal converter versus
bypass of thermal converter.
3. Develop instrument curves for ranges described in Section 2.4.5.
and verify curve results graphically. (Preliminary converter
efficiency check can be performed during curve development.")
4. Converter efficiency checks were performed as described in
35 Federal Register 219, November 10, 1970, Part II.
EAC daily and weekly checks which were performed and recorded are
described below:
Daily Check
1. Leak check of HC, CO, C02 and NO instruments.
2. NO vacuum check.
-------
2-26
3. HC analyzer - zero and span.
4. CO analyzer - zero, gain and tune.
5. C02 analyzer - zero, gain and tune.
6. NO analyzer gain.
Weekly Check
1. Individual instrument curve check of each range used.
2. Converter efficiency.
3. CO response to 100% wet C02-
Additional discussion is presented in Section 2.7.1.
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer
The Clayton CE-50 dynamometers were calibrated by the coast-down
technique specified in Appendix II of 35 Federal Register 219, Part II. A
precision tachometer generator was fitted to the absorption rolls for this
purpose. AESi performed the coast-down at several power settings and at two
or more inertia values. The driver's aid was adjusted to match the correct
speed according to a 30 and a 60 Hz strobe light. Dynamometer calibration
data was plotted graphically on a Dynamometer Road Load (DRL) form (Figure 2.5-2).
Periodic coast-down calibration checks were performed on each dynamo-
meter. If the data points did not lie within tolerance (1% of full scale or 1/2 hp)
of the standing calibration curve, the entire calibration curve set was rerun.
A log book and curve file were maintained on all dynamometers.
2.5.4 Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED)
SAE J171 was the guiding document in the design, calibration and
maintenance of the SHED. AESi developed a form, the SHED Qualification Test
(SQT), Figure 2.5-3, to facilitate quality control of the SHED. The initial
setup of the SHED included calibration of the pyrometers for fuel and enclosure
temperatures and calibration of the Flame lonization Detector (FID) used to
determine hydrocarbon concentration within the SHED. Three ranges were utilized
for FID operation: 1) 0-300 ppm; 2) 0-4000 ppm; 3) 0-15,000 ppm.
For initial calibration a background emissions check, SQT Part III,
was run overnight. Then a calibration check, SQT Part I, was performed followed
by the leak check, SQT Part II. Ongoing calibration maintenance consists of
calibrations and leak checks conducted on a weekly basis.
-------
IS
(TOU *
V.X £ at
QJB ,lSU
CNVIHCNMtNTAL STSTCOS. INC.
SUPERVISOR
SCT INtRTIA FLYlillHELS TO "K"; AT
50 M.P.ll. S1JT 1S1). R.L.H.T.; RUN
DYNO TO 60 M.P.ll.; LIFT CAR OFF
DYNO; TIME "T" FROM 55 TO 45
M.P.I!.: R.L.II.P.= 0.06073 (K/T)
DYNAMOMETER 110AD :LOAD ' HCRSEPOiVER
1028
10 15
ROAD LOAD HORSEPOWER AT SO M.P.H.
-------
SQT
TECH :
SHED VOLUME: 1695.3 FT. = V
SHED QUALIFICATION TEST
Prj.No.
W//M
Site
Date
I. CALIBRATION
A. PURGE SHED.
B. SEAL DOOR. *V,
SCF
= (-0.00136 • T
+ 13.6912)P
'- CYL. AFTER
1
C. READ SHED BACKGROUND. FID
D. INJECT =15 GRAMS PROPANE. CYL. FULL
E. OPERATE MIXING FAN 3-5 MIN. READ SHED.
(PPM1 - PPMBKD) 0.00173 • VSCF * GP = */££/% RECOVERY = 100 ±5%?
II. LEAK CHECK
g" --V • 1.298 * T
= *GP %£•?> TIMEj
TIME
PASS
OQ
A. LEAVE SHED SEALED AFTER CALIBRATION. LEAVE MIXING FAN ON. DO NOT READ SHED.
B. AFTER 4 HR. READ SHED. FID ^£fj*PPM, T^Y TIME T'2^ -T, = * <(•£ E.T. HR.
^ — 3-* 1
- PPM ) V_r_ • 0.0000173 * E.T. = *#«0>g/HR. LEAKAGE *0.1 g/HR.? //5 PASS
i oLr •f-'-
III. EMISSION CHECK
A. PURGE SHED.
B. SEAL SHED. TIME ?.>V *V
SCF.
V/= (-0.00136 • TA
+ 13.6912)P,
V • 1.298 t Tr
C. READ SHED. FID
*PPM
b. LEAVE SHED SEALED AND DO NOT SAMPLE FOR 4 HR. READ SHED.
FID 5^.#*PPM. 5V- / TIME ^.T/- T. = *///£. T. HR.
(PPM4 - PPM3) VSCF • 0.0000173 t E.T. 2 = *<
EMISSION «0.1 g/HR.?
PASS
COMMENTS:
N)
00
Calculated Value. All others are observed.
1029
-------
2-29
AESi used a fuel conditioning cart of the same manufacture and type
as EPA. The cart simply required calibration of the temperature sensor and
adjustment of the thermostatic control system.
-------
2-30
2.6 TEST PROCEDURES
2.6.1 Vehicle and Equipment Preparation
All vehicles tested in this program were inspected upon receipt
from the vehicle owner. The inspection consisted of verification of the
particular make, model year, type of engine, transmission and other infor-
mation pertinent to the program. In addition, a cursory inspection was performed
to determine that the vehicle was operating safely and that the exhaust system
was not leaking. Also, each test vehicle was inspected for any visible damage
which was pointed out to the owner and noted on the appropriate forms.
For those vehicles which were subject to evaporative emissions tests,
the vehicle preparation consisted not only of the inspection upon receipt of
the car from the owner, but also draining the fuel tank, installing a thermocouple
through a hole drilled in the filler cap received with the car, and filling the
fuel tank to 40 percent capacity with temperature conditioned fuel.
The need to test each vehicle in the as-received condition was of
paramount consideration during the vehicle preparation procedures. Because
of this important program need, measurements of vehicle operating parameters
such as basic ignition timing, point dwell, idle speed, and idle mixture were
performed on the vehicle following exhaust and evaporative emissions tests.
In order to prevent any possibility of technicians upsetting any of the as-
received adjustments, instruments were not attached to the test vehicles prior
to the exhaust emissions test. A visual examination of the underhood area
was performed in order to determine that gross malfunctions of the running
gear would not occur. Also a visual examination of the exhaust system was
performed in order to determine if any leaks existed.
All test equipment was thoroughly warmed up, calibrated, and
inspected for proper operation prior to the performance of any tests. The
chassis dynamometer was thoroughly warmed up using a non-test vehicle, if
the dynamometer had not been used during the previous two hours. During the
dynamometer warmup procedure, inertia and road load of the dynamometer were
properly set for the following test car. In addition, the dynamometer speed
indicator was calibrated and checked against the driver's aid to ensure that
both speed indications were identical.
-------
2-31
The exhaust analysis console was normally left operating during
the daylight hours. All instruments were left in a standby status with either
dry nitrogen or dry air continuously flowing through the instruments. Therefore,
it was normally not necessary to perform any preparation on the exhaust analysis
console prior to testing with the exception of the routine calibration procedures.
In the event that the exhaust analysis console or any instruments were shut
down for any length of time prior to testing, a minimum warmup period of one
half hour was required prior to use. The NOX instrument ozone generator was
normally turned off each night. About ten minutes warmup time was provided
prior to use of the NOX instrument. Normally, however, this warmup time occurred
while other instruments were being calibrated or while the vehicle was being
prepared for testing.
The constant volume sampler does.require approximately one-half hour
warmup prior to testing to ensure precise measurements, if it had not been
operated during the previous 24 hour period. If operation was performed in the
last 24 hours, less warmup time was required. The CVS was equipped with controls
to permit rapid heating of the heat exchanger and blower. The constant volume
sampler was turned on and operated early in the morning to ensure that the tempera-
ture stabilized by the time testing was initiated for the day. The CVS was
connected to the vehicle used for dynamometer warmup to warm the flexible duct
and mixing plenum.
No specific preconditioning procedures were utilized for the SHED
with the exception of ensuring that high background hydrocarbon levels were
not present in the SHED prior to testing. The flame ionization detector
utilized for SHED hydrocarbon determinations was always warmed up and calibrated
prior to use.
2.6.2 Federal Exhaust Emission Testing Procedures
All cold start exhaust emissions tests were performed in accordance
with the procedures stipulated in 35 Federal Register 219, Part II, Sections
85.70 and 85.87 and as amended in 36 Federal Register 55, and 36 Federal Regis-
ter 128. The preconditioning procedure was performed by the vehicle owner
while driving to the test facility, rather than preconditioning the vehicle
in accordance with the Federal Test Procedures.
-------
2-32
Fuel used for emissions testing at the Westminster, California,
test facility was the fuel contained in the vehicle tank as received, or a popular
commercial fuel was added to "top-off the tank as required. Since intermediate
grade fuel was generally marketed in the Los Angeles area during most of the
time this program was being run, only Indolene 30 test fuel was used for those
vehicles requiring evaporative emissions testing. Indolene 30 test fuel was
used for all program test vehicles in the St. Louis laboratory.
The exhaust analysis console was essentially identical with that
required for the 1972 Federal Test Procedures with the addition of a CO-
analyzer.
Another modification to the test procedure used in the program,
which differs slightly from the 1972 Federal Test Procedure was that separate
sample and background bags were collected during the cold transient portion
(0 - 505 seconds) as well as the cold stabilized portion (506 - 1372 seconds)
of the Federal Test. The Federal procedure calls for sample collection of one
sample bag and one background bag during both of these portions. The results
from the cold start portion of the test, however, are presumed to be identical
to the prescribed 1972 procedure because mass calculations were performed on
each of the transient and stabilized portions separately.
Following the cold transient and cold stabilized portions of the
test, the ten minute soak was performed as stipulated for the 1975 Federal Test
Procedure. After the soak, the hot transient test and the hot stabilized test
were performed using separate sample and background bags for each portion. The
only difference expected in the results from the actual Federal Test Procedure
and the slightly modified procedure used in this program are attributed to those
differences in background emissions levels between the transient and stabilized
portions of the test.
Data accumulated during the Federal Test Procedure consisted of
both volumetric and mass measurements for each of the portions of the procedure,
i.e., cold transient, cold stabilized, hot transient, and hot stabilized. Mass
results were calculated for the cold transient and cold stabilized portions
and presented as grams per vehicle mile. These results have been referred to
as the 1972 Federal Test Procedure results. In addition, the 1975 Federal
Test Procedure results were calculated by combining the mass values from the
-------
2-33
cold transient, cold stabilized, and hot transient portions of the test in
accordance with the weighting factors provided by the 1975 Testing Procedure.
This was referred to as the 1975 Federal Test Procedure. Additional discus-
sion relating to calculation of results by these modified procedures is found
in Section 2.7 entitled "Data Handling".
2.6.3 Evaporative Emissions Test Procedure
The evaporative emissions test procedure was performed on a subsample
of test vehicles in Los Angeles selected by the EPA Project Officer. The procedure
used for evaporative emissions testing was that stipulated in SAE Technical
Report J171 entitled "Measurement of Fuel Evaporative Emissions from Gasoline
Powered Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Using the Enclosure Technique." An
exception to the procedure was that the 1975 FTP was used rather than the specified
7-mode cycle, to warm up the vehicle prior to hot soak loss measurements. In
accordance with the contract, the measurement of running evaporative losses was
deleted.
The fuel required for evaporative emissions testing was Indolene 30
Test Fuel. The original tank fuel was removed from the test car. Prior to the
diurnal loss measurements, temperature conditioned test fuel was pumped into the
vehicle tank in accordance with the test procedure. The fuel filler cap which
was originally provided on the test vehicle had been removed previously, drilled
in the appropriate location and fitted with a fine wire thermocouple for internal
fuel temperature measurement. When the cap was replaced, care was taken to ensure
that the thermocouple end was immersed in the fuel. A new cap was installed
before return of the vehicle to its owner.
After the vehicle tank was filled to the specified 40% volume with
temperature conditioned test fuel and the filler cap installed, silicone rubber
heating pads were placed around the tank below the fuel level. The heating pads
were affixed by the use of tape or heavy duty permanent magnets. In accordance
with the SHED procedure the temperature of the fuel was elevated at a relatively
uniform rate to attain the desired temperature of 84° F in one hour.
Figure 2.6-1 depicts a Temperature Achievement Plot (TAP) which was developed
-------
a a 8 i
Aurouomt EHVIROHUIMTM srtnas. IMC.
TEMPERATURE ACHIEVEMENT PL01
000/f
Sq. No.
0007. k
Car No.
Z05O
Pr j .No .
Site
Date
TECH: 5f^/<
H
0>
8S
80
u.
o
(-,
O
cx
rt
H
C
0)
M
c
M 6S
60
v'
7^
z
K)
I
10 IS 20 25 50
Elapsed Minutes
40 -45 50 55 60 65 70
-------
2-35
jointly by EPA and AESi personnel to achieve a uniform rate of heating. This
temperature achievement plot was utilized for the evaporative,emissions tests
in the Westminster, California, facility. The use of the TAP is relatively
simple and effective. During the first few minutes of the one hour diurnal
soak, fuel temperatures are plotted versus time. A straight line drawn through
the last two points can then be extrapolated to determine if the desired tempera-
ture and time coordinates will be achieved. The visual indication of temperature
versus time enables the technician to obtain a uniform heating rate to the
desired temperature by making only two or three relatively minor temperature
adjustments.
Following diurnal loss measurements the test vehicle was pushed
onto the chassis dynamometer. Of course, the dynamometer had1 previously been
warmed up and adjusted to the correct inertia and horsepower. The Federal
I
exhaust emissions test procedure was then performed. However, only the cold
start, comprised of the cold transient and cold stabilized portions, the ten
minute soak, and the hot start, hot transient portions were performed. In all
evaporative tests the hot start, hot stabilized portions of the test were deleted.
Immediately following the cold and hot start test, the vehicle was driven into
the SHED and the SHED sealed for the hot soak loss measurement. During this
portion of the evaporative emissions test, frequent measurement of air temperature
within the SHED was required. This was because certain cars had a tendency to
heat the SHED more rapidly than others and the maximum temperature of 90° could
be exceeded rapidly unless cooling fans were directed against
SHED walls.
the external
Fuel samples were obtained using the bottom filling technique in
a sealed, plated, sheet metal container. The importance of proper fuel sample
handling techniques was realized and samples were carefully taken and stored
in a refrigerator until fuel inspections were performed. The fuel inspections
consisted of a determination of Reid vapor pressure by the ASTM method D 323,
a distillation by the ASTM method D 86 including determination of temperatures
at initial boiling point, final boiling point and the 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50
and 90 percent evaporated points. In addition, a hydrogen/carbon atom ratio
determination was performed on the fuel samples. Analyses were obtained
through a private laboratory by the use of a chromatographic technique
which identified all hydrocarbon constituents in the initial boiling point to
-------
2-36
130°F distillation cut of the test fuel sample. Identification of the hydrocarbon
peaks and of .their molal concentrations was obtained. A computer program was
devised to calculate the hydrogen/carbon ratio on the basis of these values.
Data and procedures for calculating evaporative losses are more fully described
in Section 2.7 entitled "Data.Handling".
2.6.4 Daily Test Schedule
The following is a summary of the daily td'st schedule which was
performed on those vehicles subjected to exhaust emissions tests only, at the
Westminster, California, laboratory.
1. After receipt of vehicle, preparation of appropriate vehicle
information forms and performance of the vehicle inspection, the
vehicle was allowed to soak for the minimum 12 hour period.
2. Following the soak a Federal cold start test was performed.
The cold start consisted of sample and background collections
for each of the transient and cold stabilized portions.
3. A 10-minute soak with the engine off was then performed.
4. The Federal hot start test was performed and involved the
collection of separate background and sample bags for each of
the hot transient and hot stabilized portions.
5. Following testing, appropriate vehicle information
such as basic ignition timing, point dwell, idle RPM,
and idle mixture (undiluted CO) were measured and
recorded.
Following is the daily test procedure used on vehicles subjected
to evaporative and exhaust emissions measurements.
1. After receipt of the vehicle from the consumer and preparation
of appropriate vehicle information forms, the vehicle inspection
was performed. The vehicle was then readied for the 12 hour
(minimum) soak.
2. The fuel remaining in the vehicle fuel tank as received was
drained from the test vehicle. Concurrently, the fuel filler
cap was modified to accept the thermocouple for measurement of
internal fuel temperature.
-------
2-37
3. Following the minimum 12-hour soak, the temperature conditioned
fuel was pumped into the fuel tank. During the soak, thermocouples
were connected and the silicone rubber heating pads were installed
on the fuel tank. , The temperature of the fuel was increased in
accordance with the prescribed procedures. The diurnal loss test
was then performed for 60 minutes.
4. The Federal cold start exhaust emissions test was performed
within 15 minutes after removal of the test vehicle from the SHED.
5. The Federal cold start procedure was performed utilizing
separate sample and background bags for each of the cold transient
and cold stabilized portions.
6. Following the cold start, the normal 10-minute soak with engine
off was performed.
7. The hot transient portion of the Federal hot start test was
then performed using the bag collection technique.
8. Immediately following the hot transient portion, the vehicle
was removed from the dynamometer and driven into the SHED at as
low an engine load as possible, The time allowed for removal of
vehicle from dyno to engine shutoff in SHED was about one minute.
9. Thermocouple wires were connected to display devices. The
SHED was then sealed and the hot soak losses were measured. The
time allocated for hot soak losses was one hour.
10. Following testing, appropriate vehicle information
such as basic ignition timing, idle RPM, idle mixture
(undiluted CO) and point dwell were measured and
recorded.
The following is a summary of the daily test schedule for vehicles
at the St. Louis laboratory.
1. After receipt of vehicle, preparation of appropriate vehicle
information forms and performance of the vehicle inspection, the
fuel tank was drained and Indolene 30 Test Fuel was added to 40
percent tank capacity. The first 505 seconds of the Federal Test
Procedure were driven on the chassis dynamometer to precondition
the vehicle's fuel system. Following this preconditioning, the
vehicle was soaked for the minimum 12-hour period.
2. Following the soak, a Federal cold start test was performed.
The cold start consisted of sample and background collections
for each of the transient and cold stabilized portions.
3. A 10-minute soak with the engine off was then performed.
-------
2-38
4. The Federal hot start test was performed and involved the
collection of separate background and sample bags for each of
the hot transient and hot stabilized portions.
5. Following testing, appropriate vehicle information such as
basic spark timing, spark advance, point dwell, idle RPM and idle
mixture (undiluted CO) were measured and recorded.
-------
2-39
2.7 DATA HANDLING
2.7.1 Data Collection
AESi developed several test data forms for use in this program.
A Test Data Sheet form was developed for the program as shown in Figure 2.7-1.
This particular form is arranged in keypunch format. Evaporative emissions
were measured in general accordance with the Sealed Housing for Evaporative
Determinations (SHED) Technique outlined in SAE Technical Report J171,
September, 1970. The data form used is shown in Figure 2.7-2.
In order to ensure first quality data, several other forms were
used for total system quality. Figure 2.7-3 is an example of a Daily Instrument
and CVS System Check form. In conjunction with the Daily Check form is the CVS
Propane Recovery form shown in Figure 2.7-4. A Weekly Check form, Figure 2.7-5,
was designed to ensure that each instrument curve is within limits of the curve
originally developed. The Weekly Check was also used as the Monthly Curve
Inspection form. This form also provides for an NOX converter check, a 100% wet
C02 response check of the CO instrument and calibration curve update information.
AESi facilities also used a seven day ambient weather station, but as an
additional check, a Daily Ambient Plot was still maintained in each laboratory
as a permanent record. Figure 2.7-6 is an example of the weekly weather station
chart and Figure 2.7-7 is an example of,a Daily Ambient Plot (DAP).
For verification of valid instrument curve development, AESi used
a Calibration Curve Result form (Figure 2.7-8). The use of this form allowed
AESi the flexibility to accept or reject instrument curve data before entry
into the computer. Instrument curves were developed on the Tymshare terminal
computer and were generated by either one of two methods. The curves for all
instrument ranges, with the exception of the 0-10% range for carbon monoxide (CO),
were generated using a second order polynomial method of least squares equation.
The curves for the 0-10% carbon monoxide (CO) range were generated by LaGrangian
interpolation.
AESi used the data accumulation system at each test site that
allowed for near instantaneous review of data for a particular test vehicle.
Following verification of vehicle acceptability, AESi used a packet of file
folders containing all data pertaining to the total testing and inspection
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMCNTAL SYSTEMS. INC.
PRJ NO. : CAR NO.
TEST DATA SHEET
WB BARO CYL A/C EVP EXH PCV
fro.o y
PIC TEC DRI . TVP ENG 10
§1 U U lo
HC
R
3
3
DEF.
1 O.t>
I O.b
CO
R
3
3
DEF.
1 0.3
06
C02
R
3
3
DEF.
38.'
2.M
NO,
R
5
6
DEF.
9-1.0
0.2
NO
R
5
5
DEF.
5S/7
O.|
TEMP
1 1 q
PRESS
/ /.7
COUNT
°l Hlb
DELTA P
/ H.6
MPH
•
COLD STABILIZED:
1
1
3
4
n
3
3
DEF.
fe.3
O.fc
R
3
3
DEF.
1 0.^
0.1
R
3
3
DEF.
.23.2
ap
R
6
5
DEF.
36./
-0.4
R
5
5
DF.F.
2fc..5
a.i
TEMP
; ) °i
PRESS
II. 6
COUNT
1 4,233
DELTA P
/ q.s
MPH
•
HOT TRANSIENT:
1
1
5
6
HC
R
2
2
DEF.
S2.M
5.M
CO
R
3
3
DEF.
9.?
0.fc
CO?
R
3
3
DEF.
33.5
2.3
NO.
R
5
5
DEF.
73. /
0-H
NO
R
5
5
DEF.
55^
0.2
TEMP
/ /Q
PRESS
1 1.7
COUNT
Q63*-
'DELTA P
1 ^.5
MPH
t
HOT STABILIZED:
1
1
7
8
R
a
2
DEF.
9-6.1
7.5
R
3
3
DEF.
/ o.?
0^
R
3
3
DEF.
•22.2
5.4
R
6
5
DEF.
SO.fc
O.S
R
5
5
DEF.
2t>.<3
0.3
TEMP
1 /Q
PRESS
t t.7
COUNT
i fc a43
DELTA P
MPH
•
IMO2
1037
-------
MJTQUOTI\'t fNViHOffUCHrAL SVSTfMS. IHC
H-
OQ
IBP
(12
Sq. No.
00024.
Car No.
Prj.No
urtffi
Site
Date
EVAPORATIVE TEST SHED RESULTS
Time
BKG.
•Initial
5 min.
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55 ,
60
65
70
P., 30. ZO "Hg, Diurnal, D
Ehclo.
Tempj Te
*l°
7*°
79°
7? °
7? °
7?'
79'
7?"
79°
79°
^r
7?'
^'
*/)'
Int.
Tank
Temp
39°
(fll°
fof
/*6°
fit*
It
7>
K°
11'
w
xr
w°
&'
Ext.
Tank
Temp
^
^^
^^
^^
^^
^^
^S*
^^
^*
s^
S^
^^
FID, Defl.,
ppm1
6-r
11:3
Jj/.o
4V. V
vi.s-
71
»v.
rhi
Jl. 6
ii.4
• l*t. *7
/6>.3~
il.l
rf. 2-
AESi
range
2—
_: RVP, psi
Pa 30.2-1 "Hg, Hot Soak, H
Enclos.
Temp, Te
: H/C Ratio •'
H/C Ratio) 0.03422 •(ppm1 -BKG )
8R = HC Mass J?V).V^ grams, D
(12
"Hg _•_ Te
- o
Int.
Tank
$7
Ext.
Tank
Temp
FID Defl.
m-
5.2.
/V.
27. C
/« .?. &
Id.ti
AESi
: Type Fuel Used
IS)
I
-b
H/C ratio)0.03422»(ppm2 -BKG )
_"Hg -J- Te °R = HC massy
-------
n, r-*s^a f
:l:L-3'.,iil
Site
Date
DAILY CVS & EAC
DATE
LEAK CHECK
VAC CHECK
1IC
CO
C02
NO
NO
NOx
FID
ZERO
GAIN
rZEBO GAD TUNE
- CO
C02
NO
.Zf.RO
GAIN TUNE
AIN
SHED FT I;
ZERO GAIN
Fin PRESS'?!-;i; !.c!ii'n
SMPL
l:UELj
:UEL| AIR ISMPL
JIRESSJ.
FUELjAIR !
! PIC
u
0.9
QO
OLO
m&*
'TrtD
0-0
0~0
0.0
74
0.0
W3J&.1?!
10.0
0-0
o.o_
?0.60-0
|£0
\0.0
&6\o~6
t>
213.
?n
5Ai/tfi'f
>7f£
I?
_ j t
DATE
i£O.O \Qff-
m
LEAK CHECK
BKGI) BAG
SMPL 'HAG
I i
B2_[^ SI i S2
^?[?-^
.o
O.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
ao
o.o
0,0
o.o
0.0
~o.o
CONT
DEF
c.o
0-0
o.J
o.o
0.3
0.0 6. >
PF,!-
DF.
OJ
0.
DM
PA.
ej
PROPANE TEST
ni-r.
t>:Y\ttr$«
~o->
oft
sic A
14 if
IT?
SO
7'
'°
N)
I
N)
MAINTENANCE:
-------
AESi ..,1
Aurouonve ENVIRONMCNTAL SYSTTMS. INC.
PRT
CVS PROPANE RECOVERY TEST NO.
*i?e
TECH:
E.T.: .to;oo
A P: /?,->
FID
DEFLECTIONS
31 f«.?
"f.f
PPMr
L
2JZ?
//.^
TO
CO
IS)
^J
I
-e>
(-0.00136 • T
-P
+.13.6912) o P
i
^J^
V
"H.,0 + T
2.2454 « NET
Ft. 3/Rev. o 0.00001 • N JJ_Z^7= HC MASS
GRAMS
PROPANE CYLINDER EMPTY
PROPANE CYLINDER FULL
10° + HC MASS =
ERROR
GAIN
Y- LOSS
Comments:
-------
tibt ENViRQNMtNTAL SlTTr**J. INC
Sq. NoJ Prfftfto.
Site'Date
WEEKLY CHECK
INST
AESi
RANGE
RANGE
SPAN
CONC. DEF.
MID RANGE
CONC.|DEF.
MID RANGE
CONC.IDEF.
MID RANGE
co:,1;:. DEF. -
MID RANGE
CON'C7|DEF.
MID RANGE
CONC.IDEF.
MID RANGE
CONC. I DEF.
ZERO
DEF.
P.I.C
FID
10
100
1000
S0(?
?*>
CO
l-II
T-W
>>'*
l-tf
2-H
3-H
.&(
tr.r
1-L
2-1
3-L
C02
MOO
if-V
/
>
"NO-
NO
100
250
1000
7&MW
10 <{
NO
NO
CONVERTER CHECK
DLI- .
START
If-?
W7
DEF.
END
r-g
wt
llMt
E.T.
10.00
(0.00
FID
SHED LEAK CHECK
L'tF.
START
DcF.
END
11Mb
E.T.
CO
mm
C02
DEFT
10
WET
100%
C02
J ~?
MASTER CURVE
F.FF RUN #
1036
-------
E A T H E R /^E A S U R E CORPORATION
P o BOX 41J57 SAGHAMtNTO, CALIFORNIA «6«4 I
1ELE FtONE <«1ft) 4*1 7M6
METEOROORAPH
CHART n t 701 W-HG-HF
-------
o if iff
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS. INC.
© Dry Bulb
A Wet Bulb
12
DAP
2050
Prj.No.
WTM
Site
6/3/73
Date
Daily Ambient Plot
8 PM
4 PM.
OP
H
^ 12 Noon
i
8 AM
4 AM.
12
1077
50 60 70 80 90
°F 28.00
Suoervisor
in
11
10
9
7
6
5
.
3
2
1
Dn
11
10
9
1.
7
. 6
4.
3
2
1
In
-rrv
:...
-—
•
::;:
.;.::.
'
••••
0
•':
•.]':.":
I|H
;.:-
•;•.:
•;.
. . t .
•::;
v;
1 ; -f
.
. - - \
!';! •'
. •
• • :
•; :
. !
- . ;
:':
i ••
... i
• !
• ' '
1 ' I
• i .
i -
i ",
•p .;" '
1 - • i ' ' j i
,;.:,
• I
:
• • i
.-; :
o •
:-,;,-,;•
" . '
1
1 - . .
1
-----
, .
!
:
j
:
i • ;
• I :!'
'.•"{""
• • :i :
•; -: ;r:
-
•"• .
i
i
-
29.00 30.00 f
: ' •
• :
1 ' j '
i ::| !•!'
i - ; ":
-
•
!" i :•
1
: : i
: i ; ! '
i
' i :' - :
•i. i i !
' ' ; . i -: :
i ;
• i :
i
I
: ' '
I ; >
i •
i '
j • ;
I
Iv ;•••;-
9
•9
o •
• -- — •---
'.
. •
'
\
1
:
12
8
4
N)
1
e>
>
12
8
4
10
28.50
29.00
29.50
30.00
3O.50
-------
CALIBRATION CURVE RESULTS
CONCENTRATION
-------
2-48
procedures for each test vehicle. This packet contained the following items:
1. Selected Vehicle Owner Contact form.
2. Program Log Sheet (Figure 2.7-9).
3. Test Data Sheet form which contains results of all test data.
A copy of this material was filed at the test site and the original
sent to the AESi corporate office for data processing and filing. Also, a
separate common file for tests conducted during a certain period of time was
inserted in the on-site file and also at the AESi corporate office file. An
example of items contained in the common file are listed below:
1. CVS Flow Calibration.
2. NOX Converter Check Verification.
3. Dynamometer coast-down calibration.
4. Dynamometer speedometer and horsepower calibration.
5. Weekly Laboratory Status Report.
6. Copy of Weekly Check form.
7. Weather Station Chart or Daily Ambient Plot.
8. Instrument Curves.
9. Daily Instrument and CVS Check form.
10. CVS Propane Recovery form.
2.7.2 Data Processing
Vehicle information, results of vehicle inspection and emissions
test data as recorded on the Test Data Sheet were then forwarded to the Computer
Sciences Department. This sheet included all required vehicle information such
as the Federal vehicle identification number, test description, cubic inch dis-
placement, number of carburetor Venturis, type of transmission and inertia weight.
Also included were certain inspection and maintenance data. Exhaust emissions
data were recorded in the form of instrument range and deflections for HC, CO,
C02, NOX and NO concentrations in the sample and background bags. Evaporative
emissions test results for all instruments were also forwarded to the Computer
Sciences Department to be used in translating test deflections to concentrations.
2.7.3 Calculations of Results
2.7.3.1. Exhaust Emissions: Results from the various test procedures
performed during the program were calculated using well known techniques. The
method for obtaining mass emissions, on a grams per mile basis, as specified
in the 1972 and 1975 Federal Test Procedures, was generally used.
-------
tNVIHONMlNTAl JTSTTMJ. fNC
PROGRAM LOG SHEET
Projoct 2050
.ST.
LIC. NO.
Pass Fail Initial
T)
H-
OS
I
Inspect vehicle for compliance
Test car release form
Rental car release form
Drain fuel
Fill tank to 40% capacity, Indolene
30 test fuel
Precondition car for ten minutes
LA4 test
Perform 12 hour soak
Run cold start LA4 test
Soak for 10 minutes
Run hot start LA4 test
(Kf
( )
( )
( )
/ \L\2\7\6\c\2H I" I I
SERIAL NO.
Pass Fail Initial
Measure and record tuneup information
Ignition timing
Dwell
Idle RPM
Idle mixture (% CO)
Review test data
Determine if replicate test is
required
Inspect vehicle for damage
Wipe car clean as necessary
Return car to owner
Owner signature for acceptance of vehicle
Fill out Bond form $25
Bond sent to owner
Send test data forms to AESi and retain copy
for test site files.
I hereby certify that the above items have been
completed to the best of my knowledge.
Laboratory Supervisor
Date
-------
2-50
Emissions test results by test location are presented in Tables 1 -
10. The basic exhaust emissions results (in grains per mile) versus the various
parameters are shown below:
Table No.
1A, IB Vehicle Make
2A, 2B Vehicle Manufacturer
3A, 3B Model Year
4A, 4B Number of Cylinders
5A, 5B Displacement
6A, 6B Inertia Weight
7A, 7B Transmission Type
8A, 8B Carburetion
9A, 9B Results of Replicate Tests
10A Number of Vehicles Meeting 1972 Standards
These results are shown by test site and test procedure (e.g. 1A is for 1972
Federal Test Procedure and IB is for the 1975 Federal Test Procedure).
2.7.3.2 Evaporative Emissions: The weighted average hydrogen/carbon
(HC) atom ratio of the initial boiling point to 130°F vapor fraction of the test
fuel was determined by use of a chromatographic technique*. A squalene column
was used to produce thirty-three chromatographic peaks. Using data from a
paper by Maynard and Sanders, and a known sample of natural gas, the eluted
peaks were identified and the mole percents determined. The H/C ratios were
calculated from the respective chemical compositions.
The following formula was used to compute the weighted average
H/C ratio for each vapor sample.
33
£
Fuel H/C ratio = i=l (Xi ' H/CiJ
100
where x. represents the mole percent of each individual fuel component and
H/C. represents the H/C ratio of each individual component. Evaporative emissions
were calculated in accordance with SHED procedure (SAE J171). Summary results
of evaporative emissions tests are highlighted in Table 11. Individual
evaporative emissions test results are presented in Table 14 of the Appendix.
*J.B. Maynard and W.N. Sanders, "Determination of the Detailed HC Composition
and Potential Atmospheric Reactivity of Full-Range Motor Gasolines." Shell Oil
Company, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, July, 1969.
-------
2-51
TABLE 1A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT I AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
170
HC
MEAN
3.
5.
2
6.
9.
4.
6.
4.
4.
8.
4.
7.
5.
6.
3.
10.
6.
42
82
12
70
07
23
02
88
15
03
40
11
48
91
42
60
04
S. D.
1.
6.
1.
6.
4.
1.
4.
2.
0.
6.
2.
0.
1.
3.
0.
15.
6.
2
2
3
5
0
7
7
3
0
0
1
0
6
8
9
3
2
CO
MEAN
C02
MEAN S. D.
53. 95 27. 8 503. 41 71. 0
76. 95 40. 4 687. 56 14O. 7
50. 50 18. 4 929. 21 235. 7
74. 61 41. 1 593. 76 119, 5
4. 0 139. 15 47. 7 605. 21 59. 0
37. 18 14. 4 351. 85 94. 2
99. 01 42. 0 563. 31 90. 4
69. 40 32. 8 563. 53 136. 4
68. 86 0. 0 776. 35 0. 0
96. 61 34. 3 6S3. 38 1O8. 9
69. 50 25. 2 685. 78 135. 6
71. 92 0. 0 338. 67 0. 0
97. 47 38. 3 527. 65 120. 1
74. 15 20. 7 672. 02 81. 5
60. 13 31. 5 360. 99 15. 4
75. 80 46. 5 307. OO 30. 4
76. 96 37. 9 585. 04 160. 4
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 30 1. 5
3. 99 1.8
5. 68 1. 3
3. 80 1. 2
4. 46 1. 6
3. 07 0. 2
3. 85 1. 4
4. 37 2. 0
5. 86 0. O
4. 22 2. 0
4. 60 1. 2
5. 19
3. 87
4. 75
4. 05
2: 55
,4. 10
0. 0
1. 8
1. 6
0. 9
1. 1
1. 6
-------
2-52
TABLE 1A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
ST LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
C02 '
MEAN S. D.
NO. OF
AMC
EUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD ,
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT I AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
170
HC
MEAN
4.
5.
5.
7.
1O.
5.
9
4.
4.
5.
5.
3.
5.
7.
5.
6.
6.
35
50
07
04
18
21
53
65
13
83
19
07
70
69
18
33
19
S. D.
•-H
--'.
3.
4.
4.
7.
-TI
9
1.
0.
2.
2.
0.
3.
4.
3.
7.
4.
0
1
2
6
7
2
9
•-*
•_'
0
2
1
0
3
6
7
5
6
CO
MEAN
51.
96.
96.
31.
113.
74.
77.
60.
54.
60.
74.
45.
64.
84.
48.
49.
72.
86
63
42
06
89
60
49
20
37
93
68
28
89
48
94
31
95
S. D
48. (.
59. ;
91. (
55. <•
75. :
46. (
61. :
30. :
0. <
56. (
37. i.
0. <
39. :
5O. '
34. !
29. :
49. <
0. 0 730. 88 0. 0
6. 0 594. 90 101. 5
7. 6 658. 29 56. 6
0. 0 323. 91 0. 0
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
3.
3.
2.
4.
4.
7.
4.
5.
4.
4.
4.
3.
2.
4.
83
39
02
73
57
32
45
71
37
03
14
19
92
24
35
77
20
S. D.
2.
2.
2.
1.
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
4
0
2
4
9
S
2
9
0
3
5
0
.0
6
8
8
8
-------
2-53
TABLE IE
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DAT5UN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLD3MOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT I AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
170
HC
MEAN
3.
5.
1.
5.
7.
3.
5.
4.
3.
7.
-— t
O.
6.
4.
6.
2.
10.
5.
29
03
90
87
32
40
23
27
57
58
85
03
77
03
90
61
37
S. D.
1.
._!.
1.
6.
2.
1.
4.
1.
0.
6.
1.
0.
1.
7.
0.
16.
6.
3
6
1
1
7
3
1
9
0
7
9
0
O
9
8
0
0
CO
MEAN S. D.
CO2
MEAN S. D.
43. 59 26. 0 483. 83 63. 6
64. 70 37. 7 663. 42 132. 0
3. 8? 14.
832. 65 214. 1
63.04 39.3 575.09 115.7
2.7 116.06 29.4 597.65 59.9
32. 56 10. 7 342. 42 94. 9
82. 12 40. 2 546. 25 37. 6
59. 89 30. 1 546. 02 13O. 3
60. 76 0. 0 762. 12 O. O
31. 62 36. 9 662. 48 106. 6
58. 86 25. 4 660. 79 131. 7
59. 77 O. O 371. 06 O. 0
85. 42 36. 6 513. 51 115. 8
62. 80 19. 8 645. 49 79. 9
52. 84 28. 5 350. 42 10. 1
72. 91 48. 8 302. 02 78. 5
65. 95 35. 4 566. 60 152. 4
NOXC
MEAN
4.
3.
5.
3.
4.
3.
3.
4.
5.
4.
4.
5.
3.
4.
3.
2.
4.
23
99
76
79
64
14
99
35
87
38
59
52
98
78
93
44
1.2
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
O.
1.
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
5
8
5
•-%
O
<-,
•If
•I"
5
9
0
2
1
0
9
4
9
1
6
-------
AMC
EUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOEILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES 170
2-54
TABLE IE
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MAKE
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
VEH.
5
12
4
39
4
2
10
35
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
170
HC
MEAN
3.
4.
4
6.
S.
4.
8.
4.
3.
5.
4.
2.
4.
6.
4.
5.
5.
91
60
29
20
73
03
45
11
69
37
4S
55
89
66
54
20
39
S. D.
2
^>
4.
4.
6.
•-/
9.
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
2.
3.
•^
s.'.
5.
3.
8
1
3
2
9
5
3
1
0
2
8
0
6
1
7
2
9
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
46. 70 46. 7 371. 26 73. 7
78. 44 51. 5 626. 13 146. 0
76. 48 98. 4 771. 93 165. 3
65. 12 46. 6 527. 13 129. 9
85. 91 67. 2 492. 57 113 7
52. 66 30. 8 287. 17 25. 6
65. 09 56. 5 482. 21 88. 6
47. 69 28. 4 527. 32 123. 4
29. 17 0. 0 703. 61 0. 0
53. 04 49. 1 577. 65 92. 9
59. 39 31. 1 637. 75 51. 6
29. 44 0. 0 311. 59 O. 0
49. 53 30. 3 517. 56 66. 4
70. 94 41. 8 596. 28 105. 4
42. 35 33. 9 323. 34 54. 1
48. 03 31. 5 3OO. 74 36. 0
59. 22 42. 9 526. 25 142. 8
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
3.
4.
2.
4.
4.
7.
4.
5.
4.
5.
4.
3.
2.
4.
87
70
22
82
02
86
68
81
93
16
11
26
15
37
3O
66
33
S. D.
2.
2.
2.
1.
2.
0.
2.
2.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
4
O
5
4
O
1
2
0
0
•^»
O
5
0
9
7
8
8
9
-------
2-55
TABLE 2A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER-
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
CO2
MEAN S. D.
503. 41 71.0
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
10
170
HC
MEAN
^*
6.
5.
6,
4.
•~t
•_•.
10.
6.
42
24
38
07
23
42
60
04
S. D.
1.
•^
•J>.
3.
6.
1.
0.
15.
6.
2
5
3
4
7
9
3
2
CO
MEAN
53.
104.
73.
72.
37.
60.
75.
76.
95
43
82
96
13
18
80
96
S. D.
27; £
42. ;
33. t
34. «
14. t
31. 5
46. •:
37. f
NOXC
MEAN
4.
3.
4.
4.
3.
4.
2.
4.
30
95
38
21
07
05
55
10
S. D.
1.
1.
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
5
6
0
4
2
9
1
6
-------
2-56
TABLE 2A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
HC
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
.•^
si'
10
170
MEAN
4.
7.
4.
6.
5.
5.
6.
6.
35 -
86
S3
53
21
18
33
19
S. D.
3. 0
7 2
1. 5
4. 1
3. 2
3. 7
7 5
4. 6
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
51. 36 48. O 379. 80 72. 1
77 27 55. 1 516. 11 91. 4
60. 19 34. 5 553. 97 126. 2
83 41 53. 9 596. 91 143. 6
74. 60 46. 0 290. 18 36 6
43. 94 34. 5 336. 35 54. 9
49 31 29. 2 307. 31 39. 4
72. 95 49. 0 542. O6 149. 4
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
4.
2.
3.
2.
4.
83
54
66
13
32
35
77
20
S. D.
2.
2.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
4
O
9
6
8
8
8
8
-------
2-57
TABLE 2E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
C02
MEAN 3. D.
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
3
1O
170
HC
MEAN
3.
5.
4.
5.
3.
2.
1O.
5.
29
34
79
30
40
90
61
37
S. D.
1.
2.
3.
5.
1
0.
16.
6.
3
9
3
3
3
8.
0
0
CO
MEAN
48.
83.
63.
61.
32.
52.
72.
65.
59
86
45
44
56
84
91
95
S. D.
26.
37.
31.
33.
10.
28.
48.
35.
0
6
5
;t>
7
5
8
4
624. 65 139. 6
NOXC
MEAN
4.
4.
4.
4.
3.
3.
2.
4.
23
09
39
22
14
93
44
12
S. D.
1.
1.
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
5
6
0
5
3
9
1
6
-------
2-58
TABLE 2E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE MANUFACTURER
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
C02
MEAN S. D.
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH.
5
26
43
81
2
O
10
170
HC
MEAN
3.
6.
4.
5.
4.
4.
5.
5.
91
35
30
67
03
54
20
39
S. D.
2. 8
6. 6
1. 4
3. 5
2. 5
3. 7
5. 2
3. 9
CO
MEAN
46.
61.
48.
67.
52.
42.
48.
59.
70
11
13
44
66
35
03
22
S. D.
46. :
47. t
31. S
47. 1
30. S
33. <
31. :
42. ':
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
4.
2.
3.
2.
4.
87
79
78
25
86
30
66
33
S. D.
2.
2.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
4
0
9
6
1
Q
8
9
-------
1966
1967
1963
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES 170
2-59
TABLE 3A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
10. OF
VEH.
17
13
21
22
27
30
35
HC
MEAN
7.
6.
7.
6.
7.
4.
4.
97
25
63
24
51
54
07
3. D.
11.
4.
5.
5.
7.
1.
4.
4
8
6
6
2
3
9
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
6. 04
6. 2
93. 81 42. 3 532. 15 153. 3
37. 77 52. 3 547. 27 126. 9
71, 74 32. 4 550. 45 1O1. 8
84. 26 32. 7 590. 11 177. 5
90. 14 42. 5 553. 89 113. 3
69. 39 26. 9 576. 49 173. 9
55! 66 25. 4 679. 11 136. 3
76. 96 37. 9 585. O4 16O. 4
NOXC
MEAN
3.
3.
4.
4.
4.
3.
3.
4.
41
70
94
60
44
78
83
10
S. D.
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0
8
O
7
6
1
2
6
-------
2-60
TABLE 3A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
HC
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
ALL VEHICLES
VEH.
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
170
MEAN
8.
8.
7.
6.
7.
4.
3.
6.
25
58
10
79
13
79
51
19
S. D.
2.
3.
5.
5.
7.
2.
1.
4.
7
0
5
0
1
6
1
6
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
2.7 103.85 56.9 463.76. 113.0
3.0 117.11 49.7 472.71 115.4
76. 54 44. 6 529. 95 123. S
87.23 53.5 521.73 116.7
6O. 79 39. 2 548. 52 ISO. 1
62. 29 44. 4 552. 69 161. O
42. 62 23. 6 621. 73 167. 9
72. 95 49. 0 542. 07 149. 4
NOXC
MEAN
2.
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
98
05
35
23
41
54
82
20
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
6
7
5
3
8
6
6
8
-------
2-61
TABLE 3B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D.
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
7.
5.
6.
5.
6.
-^»
3.
46
36
97
42
64
98
56
12.
4.
5.
5.
6.
1.
4.
0
5
6
4
5
3
3
ALL VEHICLES 170
5. 37
6. 0
86. 90 43. 3 517. 81 145. 2
75. 38 45. 3 536. 19 123. 9
60. 05 29. 1 531. 45 98. 6
71. 61 33. 1 568. 73 165. 3
78. 47 38. 4 534. 82 IDS. 1
59. 66 26. 5 560: 00 164. 7
46. 64 24. 1 655. 89 177. 9
65. 95 35. 4 566. 60 152. 4
NOXC
MEAN
3.
3.
A.
4.
4.
3.
3.
4.
43
77
91
68
45
82
81
12
S. D.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0
9
9
7
6
1
3
6
-------
2-62
TABLE 3E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. MODEL YEAR
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D.
.1 .
1966 17 7. 35 2. 5 91. 21 53. 9 442. 72 83. 4 3. 09 1. 3
1967 13 7. 65 2. 7 102. 24 40. 0 456. 79 106. 7 3. 07 1.7
1963 21 6. OO 4. O 62. 19 37 5 514. 34 123. 5 4. 5O 1. 6
I
1969 22 5. 70 4. 1 67. 69 45. 9 508. 98 112. 2 4. 54 2. 3
1970 27 6. 27 6. 5 46. 96 27. 1 534. 92 144. 3 4. 55 1. 8
1971 30 4. 21 2. 3 49. 59 40. 4 537. 48 156. 2 4. 67 1. 6
1972 35 3. 04 1.0 32. 16 20. 1 603. 96 160. 3 4. 83 1. 5
ALL VEHICLES 170 5. 39 3. 9 59. 22 42. 9 526. 26 142. S 4. 33 1. 9
-------
2-63
TABLE 4A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
I ^ , - . • .
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL:TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S.:D. .MEAN ..S. D. MEAN S. .D. MEAN S. D.
3 132 6.15 5.4 80.49 38.0 637.~77 131.3 4.24 1.6
6 19 3.80 1.7 65.73 -33.1 -474.80 95.1 4.16 2.0
4 19 7.56 11.4 63.64 38.6 328.97 .67.1 3.08 1.2
ALL VEHICLES 170 6. O4 6.2 76.96 37.9 585. O4 16O. 4 4.10 1.6
-------
2-64
TABLE 4A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S. D. MEAN 3. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D.
S 129 6.41 4.5 76.58 51.7 597.96 123.5 4.43 1.8
6 21 5. 81 4. 0 72 85 42. 9 4O6. 49 46. 4 3. 89 1.8
4 2O 5. 15 5. 6 49. 65 27. 3 323. 86 44. 8 3. 04 1.4
ALL VEHICLES 170 6. 19 4. 6 72. 95 49. 0 542. 06 149. 4 4. 2O 1. 8
-------
2-65
TABLE 4E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC CO CO2 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D.
•3 132 5. 39 5. O 63. 29 35. 2 616. 37 124. 4 4. 28 1. 6
6 19 3. 22 1. 4 56. SS 31 4 459. 92 91. 5 4. 10 2. 0
4 19 7. 34 11. 9 53. 74 40. 0 324. 01 65. 6 3. O2 1. 2
ALL VEHICLES 170 5. 37 6. 0 65. 95 35. 4 566. 60 152. 4 4. 12 1. 6
-------
2-66
TABLE 4B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC CO C02 NOXC
VEH. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D.
S 129 5.59 4.0 61.46 45.1 580.14 117.1 4.59 1.8
6 21 5. 15 3. 5 60. 63 39. 8 395. 62 45. 7 3. 96 1.9
4 20 4. 29 4. 0 43. 27 26. 8 315. 86 41.2 3. 06 1. 4
ALL VEHICLES 170 5. 39 3. 9 59. 22 42. 9 526. 25 142. 8 4. 33 1. 9
-------
2-67
TABLE 5A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT(CUB1C INCHES)
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
UNDER 251
251-330
331-399
OVER399
ALL VEHICLES
. VEH.
37
44
53
36
170
HC
MEAN
5.
6.
6.
4.
6.
79
79
34
94
04
S. D.
3.
4.
6.
3.
6.
3
3
6
9
2
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. ,D.
65. 68 35. 4 393. 46 1O9. 2
86. 65 39. 4 545. 36 31. 5
75.92 34.8 633.83 91.3
78. 22 41. 1 752. 88 141. 5
76. 96 37. 9 535. 04 160. 4
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
59
10
O8
65
10
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
7
8
4
5
6
-------
2-68
TABLE 5A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. - ENGINE DISPLACEMENT(CUB1C INCHES)
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
HC
UNDER 251
251-330
331-399
OVER399
ALL VEHICLES
VEH.
41
48
51
30
170
MEAN
5.
6.
6.
5.
6.
49
87
26
94
19
S. D.
4.
3.
4.
4.
4.
8
8
9
9
6
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
61. 53 37. 6 366. 18 61. 5
72. 55 52. 5 526. 71 83. 2
81. 94 49. 9 615. 73 97. 3
73. 90 54. 3 681. 77 148. 6
72. 95 49. 0 542. 06 149. 4
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
48
31
25
92
20
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
7
8
8
8
8
-------
2-69
TABLE 5E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT(CUBIC:INCHES)
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
VEH.
UNDER 251
251-33O
331-399
OVER399
ALL VEHICLES
37
44
53
36
170
HC
MEAN
5.
6.
5.
4.
5.
38
09
48
31
37
S. D.
3.
4.
5.
3.
6.
8
3
9
5
0
CO
C02
MEAN S. D.
MEAN S. D.
53. 76 35. 5 383. 62 3 03. 3
75. 71 36. 3 531. 00 80. 9
62. 95 30. 5 612 11 36. 5
65. 33 39. 6 726. 06 132. 1
65. 95 35. 4 566. 60 152. 4
NOXC
MEAN
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
53
11
16
68
12
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
7
3
4
5
6
-------
2-70
TABLE 5E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. ENGINE DISPLACEMENT(CUB1C INCHES)
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
HC
UNDER 251
251-330
331-399
OVER399
ALL VEHICLES
VEH.
41
43
51
30
170
MEAN
4.
6.
5.
5.
5.
73
03
41
14
39
S. D.
3. 8
3. 4
4. 5
4. 0
3. 9
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
52. 16 34. 3 356. 71 59. 0
58 43 43. 2 509. 49 33. 3
66. 31 43. 6 600. 17 9O. 1
57 99 50. 9 659. 13 140. 8
59. 22 42. 9 526. 26 142. 8
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
3.
4.
4.
5.
4^
52
42
4O
16
33
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
7
8
Q
8
9
-------
NO. OF
1501--2000
2001-2500
2501 --30 OO
3OO1 —3^00
3501-4000
4001-4500
'1501— TIOOO
5001-55OO
ALL.VEHICLES 170
2-71
TABLE 6A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS VEHICLE INERTIA WE IOHT(LBS)
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
VEH
6
y
:"::':
36
47
•-•C;
10
2
170
MEAN
6.
4.
5.
7
'-••
5.
2.
3.
6.
34
31
95
2^
69
10
96
53
01
S. D.
6. 9
2. 1
3. 5
6. 4
6. 5
2. 7
1. 2
2. 6
6. 2
MEAN
62.
50.
"72
7 6
34.
91.
51.
53.
7 .'-.
86
37
26
50
47
63
24
05
96
CO
S. D.
CO2
MEAN S. D.
278. 21 43. 5
355. 01 22. 9
72. 26 34. 0 ( 475. 69 1O2. 0
76. 50 35. 5 571. 92 95. 8
611. 79 94. 6
91. 63 33. 3 692. 21 106. 2
51. 24 16. 2 873. O5 150. 7
2 846. 35 115. 3
535. 04 160. 4
NOXC
MEAN
2.
3.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
4.
69
76
99
98
06
42
18
01
1C
S. D.
0.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
9
O
1
8
•-•
•_•
4
1
5
6
-------
NO. OF
15O1-2000
2001-25OO
25O1—3OOO
3001-3500
3501-4OOO
4-001-4500 36
4501-5000 9
5001-5500 3
ALL VEHICLES: 170
•-!' . T-:
TABLE 6 A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT(LBS)
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
EH.
S
12
27
37
00
MEAN
3. 95
5. 95
5. 05
6. 99
7. 32
S. D.
1. 4
7. 1
2. S
4.3
6. 1
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
6. O
4. 8
4. 6
45 14 IS. 3 300. 40 35. S
52 66 32. 4 339. 50 44. 5
63. 26 37. 4 442. 12 67. 3
73. 63 55. 3 514. 23 91. 7
35. 52 43. 4 60S. 72 95. 3
32 10 52. 1 623. 50 112. 4
49. 13 23. 5 759. 32 167. 7
103. 95 107. 2 766. 30 192. 7
72 95 49. 0 542. 07 149. 4
NOXC
MEAN
2.
3.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4.
53
35
97
93
72
40
63
10
2O
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
0
6
7
Q
9
7
8
7
S
-------
NO. OF
1501-2000
2001-2500
2501-3000
3001-3500
3501-4000
4001-4500
4501-5000
5001-5500
ALL VEHICLES 170
2-73
TABLE 6E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS VEHICLE INERTIA WEIGHT(LBS)
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
VEH
6
,3
.-,.-.
•_•-_•
36
47
23
1 0
2
170
MEAN
6.
3.
er
•_'.
6-
5.
4
2
2.
5
44
93
t=-f-\
._! !_'
54
34
27
54
'"' V
37
S. D.
7.
•->
_._
'-'•
A.
6-
2
1,
1.
6.
1
1
^
o
0
1
0
6
o
CO
MEAN S. D.
CO2
MEAN S. D.
59. 27 39. 1 271. 91 45. 2
44. 19 19. 7 351 63 22. 2
65. 02 34. 3 462. 79 99. 7
65. 23 32. 6 553. 66 91. 3
71. 63 40. 6 591. 72 90. 4
76. 91 33. S 671. 61 1O1. 4
39. 73 16. 4 340. 24 135. 6
45. 35 29. 3 316. 92 113. 6
65. 95 35. 4 566. 60 152. 4
NOXC
MEAN
2. 56
3. 73
3. 95
3. 99
4. 14
4. 47
5. 13
5. 04
4. 12
S. D.
1. O
1. 1
2. 2
1. 7
1. 4
1. 4
1. 2
1. 2
1. 6
-------
2- --74
TABLE 6B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. VEHICLE INERTIA WEIOHT(LES)
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
/ ;
i" ,
1 50 1
2O01
2501
<3O01
-• i
; 35.01
4,001
h501
[5001
ALL
. ,
-2000
— 2500
-3000
-35O.O
-4000
-4500
-5000
-5500
VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH.
s
12
27
37
33
36
9
3
170
HC
MEAN
. 3.
4.
4.
6.
6.
5.
4.
5.
5
51
32
43
12
31
21
59
06
39
S. D
1.
5.
•7
o
• 5.
2
5.
4.
;•:;
2
1
6
6
4
2
4
8
9
CO
MEAN S. D.
CO2
MEAN S. D.
42. 36 13. 6 294. 70 36. 6
43. S7 32. O 329. 97 39. 2
50. 23 33. 6 429. 52 66. 3
59. 43 44. 7 500. 50 39. 2
69. 93 42. 0 5S7. SS 39. 5
66. 99 47. 1 603. 66 105. 3
33. 73 23. 5 729. 12 159. 0
91.47 114. S 739.33 136.0
59. 22 42. 9 526. 26 142. S
NOXC
MEAN
2.
3.
4.
4.
4.
4.
5.
4.
4
52
42
11
02
38
57
77
35
33
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
O
•-^.
1.
0
5
7
3
9
7
7
0
9
-------
AUTOMATIC
MANUAL
NO. OF
VEH.
153
17
2-75
TABLE 7A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
ALL VEHICLES 170
HC
MEAN S. D.
5. 71 5. 0
9. 04 12. 1
6. O4 6. 2
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
77. 98 36. 9 611. 12 143. 6
67. 76 46. 4 350. 34 1O4. 0
76. 96 37. 9 535. O4 160. 4
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 23 1. 6
2. 96 1. 2
4. 1C 1. 6
-------
2-76
TABLE 7A
AUTOMATIC
MANUAL
150
20
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D.
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
ALL VEHICLES 170
5. 99
7. 69
6. 19
4. 3
6. 1
4. 6
72. 67 49. 6 566. 39 137. 9
75. 08 45. 4 359. 55 99. 1
72. 95 49. 0 542. 06 149. 4
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 45 1. 8
2. 3O 1.0
4. 20 1. 3
-------
2-77
TABLE 7E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AUTOMATIC
MANUAL
ALL VEHICLES
NO. OF
VEH.
153
17
170
HC
MEAIM
5.
8.
5.
OO
72
37
S. D.
4.
12.
6.
6
7
0
CO
MEAN
66.
62.
65.
38
05
95
S. D.
34. (
47. J
35. •<•
C02
MEAN S. D.
4. O 591. O9 136. 7
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 26 1. 6
2. 91 1. 3
4. 12 16
-------
AUTOMATIC
MANUAL
ALL VEHICLE:;
150
20
170
2-78
TABLE 7E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. TRANSMISSION TYPE
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D.
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
5. 21
6. 73
5. 39
3. S
4. 9
57. 99 43. 3 549. 38 131. 3
68 45 39 3 352. 75 97. 0
59. 22 42. 9 526. 25 142. 3
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 60 1. 8
2. 28 1. 0
4. 33 1. 9
-------
2-79
TABLE SA
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
HC
FOUR
TWO
ONE
FUEL
ALL
VENTURIS
VENTURIS
VENTUR I
INJECT.
VEHICLES
VEH.
42
98
29
1
170
MEAN
5.
6.
6.
2.
6.
72
15
27
34
04
S. D.
4.
5.
9
0.
6.
1
S
4
0
2
CO
MEAN S. D.
CO2
MEAN 3. D.
83. 58 43. 2 690. 78 156. 4
74. 33 31. 9 590. 38 123. 8
63. 73 37. 6 417. 75 139. 4
34. 93 0. 0 424. 03 0. 0
76. 96 37. 9 585. O4 16O. 4
NOXC
MEAN
4.
4.
3.
3.
4.
06
31
49
05
10
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
6
6
8
0
6
-------
FOUR VENTURIS. 34
TWO VENTURIS 103
ONE VENTURI '33
FUEL INJECT. 0
ALL VEHICLES 170
2-80
TABLE 8A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D.
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
6.
6.
5.
0.
6.
49
27
61
OO
19
4.
4.
5.
0.
4.
7
4
1
0
6
90. 16 61. 6 614. 54 160. 2
70. 85 46. 3 574. 93 120. 1
61 79 3Q. 3 364. SO 63. 3
0. 00 0. O 0. 00 0. 0
72. 95 49. O 542. 06 149. 4
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
3.
4.
3.
0.
4.
98
46
63
00
20
2.
1.
1.
O.
1.
1
7
8
0
8
-------
FOUR VENTURIS 42
TWO VENTURIS
ONE VENTURI
FUEL INJECT.
ALL VEHICLES 170
2-81
TABLE SB
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
VEH.
!• 42
98
29
1
170
HC
MEAN
4.
5.
5.
2.
5.
96
42
88
59
37
S. D.
3.
5.
9.
0.
6.
6
4
8
O
o
CO
MEAN
CO2
MEAN S. D.
74. 86 43. 7 669. 83 144. 3
63. 83 30. 1 571. 36 117. 8
61. 18 38. 3 406. 04 133. 6
37. 38 0. 0 422. 02 0. O
65. 95 35. 4 566. 60 152. 4
NOXC
MEAN
4.
4.
3.
3.
4.
08
36
42
23
12
S. D.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
6
5
8
O
6
-------
NO. OF
VEH.
FOUR VENTURIS 34
TWO VENTURIS 1O3
ONE VENTURI 33
FUEL INJECT. 0
ALL VEHICLES 170
2-82
TABLE SB
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS. NUMBER OF CARBURETOR VENTURIS
.ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
MEAN
5.
5.
4.
0.
5.
61
49
83
00
39
S. D.
•—i
si'.
4.
4
0.
•-;
7
0
0
0
9
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
74 97 53. 3 598. 90 149. 6
56. 12 38. 1 557. 13 114. 8
52 65 35. 3 355. 03 61. 0
0. 00 0. 0 0. 00 0. 0
59. 22 42. 9 526. 25 142. 8
NOXC
MEAN
4.
4.
3.
0.
4.
15
61
65
00
33
S. D.
2.
1.
1.
O.
1.
2
7
3
O
9
-------
FIRST TEST
SECOND TEST
10
10
BETWEEN TESTS 10
(PAIRED T).
2-83
TABLE 9A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED T TEST
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D.
CO
MEAN S. D.
CO2
MEAN S. D.
7. 92 10. 6
6. 72 10. 4
1. 20 2. 2
63. 11 30. 2 633. O4 136. 7
62. 41 27. 2 619. 04 130. 9
5. 71 9. 5 19. 01 71. 1
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 2O 1. O
3. 92 0. 9
O. 28 0. 6
-------
FIRST TEST
SECOND TEST
10
10
BETWEEN TESTS 10
(PAIRED T)
2-84
TABLE 9A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED T TEST
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
C02
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D
5. 15
5. 02
0. 13
2. 9
2. 4
1. 3
CO
MEAN S. D. MEAN S. D.
62. 66 46. 3 503. 33 138. 7
65. 49 41. 1 499. 13 135. 7
-2. 34 16. 9 4. 25 17 1
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 42 1. 9
4. 28 1.6
0. 14 0. 5
-------
FIRST TEST
SECOND TEST
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED T)
2-85
TABLE 9E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED T TEST
LOS ANGELES
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF HC
VEH. MEAN S. D.
CO
MEAN S. D.
C02
MEAN S. D.
10 6. 74 9. 5
10 6. 24 10. 1.
10 0. 50 1. 3
56. 73 28. 5 616. 17 126. 7
53. 32 26. 5 606. 06 133. 2
3. 45 6. 0 10. 10 30. 0
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 19
3. 88
0. 31
1. O
0. 9
0. 6
-------
2-86
TABLE 9E
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED T TEST
ST. LOUIS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NO. OF
FIRST TEST
SECOND TEST
BETWEEN TES.fS
'PAIRED T>
VEH.
10
10
1O
HC
MEAN
4.
4.
0.
46
31
15
S. D.
2
2.
o.
4
2
7
CO
MEAN
51.
50.
1
06
04
01
S. D.
37. £
33. t
3. '-.
C02
MEAN S. D.
3. 4 486. 34 134. 0
3. 71 16. 5
NOXC
MEAN S. D.
4. 52 1.9
4. 41 1 6
0. 11 0. 5
-------
2-87
TABLE 1OA
VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
LOS ANGELES
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOEILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT I AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
<3. 4
NO.
3
5
3
14
0
1
2
7
0
1
4
0
1
2
1
3
HC
GM/MI
PCT.
6O.
41.
75.
35.
0.
50.
20.
20.
o.
14.
36.
O.
3.
14.
33.
30.
0
7
0
9
O
0
O
0
0
3
4
0
3
3
3
0
CO
<39 GM/MI C3.
NO.
2
3
2
7
0
1
0
5
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
3
PCT.
4O.
25:
5O.
18.
0.
50.
0.
14.
0.
0.
9.
0.
3.
0.
33.
30.
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
-^%
-_*
0
0
1
0
3
0
3
0
BOTH HC
4 GM/MI AND
NO.
2
2
2
5
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
AND CO
<39 GM/MI
PCT.
40.
16.
50.
12.
0.
50.
0.
2.
0.
0.
9.
0.
0.
0.
33.
20.
O
7
0
8
0
0
O
9
0
0
1
0
O
o
3
0
1966
1967
196S
1969
1970
1971
1972
2
5
3
4
3
10
20
11. 8
27. 8
14. 3
IS. 2
11. 1
33. 3
57. 1
1
2
4
2
3
3
11
5. 9
11. 1
19. 1
9. 1
11. 1
10. 0
31. 4
0
2
1
1
2
1
10
0. 0
11. 1
4. 8
4. 6
7. 4
3. 3
28. 6
ALL VEHICLES 47
27. 7
26
15.
17
10. 0
-------
2-88
TABLE 10A
VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
ST. LOUIS
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONT I AC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
<3. 4
NO.
3
4
3
7
0
1
1
5
0
1
2
1
3
O
2
4
HC
GM/MI
PCT.
60.
33.
75.
18.
0.
50.
1O.
14.
0.
14.
18.
10O.
25.
O.
66.
40.
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
2
0
0
0
7
0
CO BOTH HC
<39 GM/MI <3. 4 GM/MI AND
NO.
3
2
1
9
0
0
3
12
0
4
1
0
4
2
2
5
PCT.
60.
16.
25.
23.
0.
0.
30.
34.
0.
57.
9.
0.
33.
14.
66.
50.
0
7
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
1 .
1
0
3
3
7
0
NO.
3
2
1
4
0
0
1
4
0
1
1
0
2
0
2
4
AND CO
<39 GM/MI
PCT.
6O.
16.
25.
1O.
O.
O.
1O.
11.
0.
14.
9.
0.
16.
0.
66.
40.
0
7
0
3
O
0
0
4
O
3
1
O
7
0
7
0
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
0
0
2
3
6
8
18
O. 0
0. 0
9. 5
13. 6
22. 2
26. 7
51. 4
1
0
5
4
10
10
18
5. 9
0.0
23. 8
18: 2
37. 0
33. 3
51. 4
0
0
1
1
5
5
13
O. 0
O. 0
4. 8
4. 6
18. 5
16. 7
37. 1
ALL VEHICLES 37
21. Q
48
23. 2
25
14. 7
-------
2-89
Table 11
EVAPORATIVE EMISSION TEST RESULTS
(Los Angeles)
SHED PROCEDURE
Number of Vehicles 20
Diurnal Soak: Time in Minutes 60
Enclosure Temperature F 76.5
Internal Temperature °F 83.9
HC (CMS) 12.07
Hot Soak: Time in Minutes 60
Enclosure Temperature °F 85.8
Internal Temperature °F 93.7
HC (CMS) 12.05
Combined Losses: HC (CMS) 24.12
Fuel Inspection Results:
Reid Vapor Pressure 8.71
Hydrogen/Carbon Ratio 2.49
Fuel Distillation Temperatures °F
Initial Boiling Point 92.4
5% Evaporated 112.4
10% " 129.4
15% " 143.4
20% " 158.0
30% " 185.5
40% " 206.8
50% " 223.2
90% " 310.3
Final Boiling Point 358.2
Average Differences Between Original and Replicate Tests N= 2
Number of Pairs 2
Diurnal: HC/ (CMS) 10.64
Hot Soak: HC/ (CMS) 5.07
Combined: HC/ (CMS) 15.72
-------
3-1
3. APPENDIX
This section contains vehicle information for each test car in
each of the two cities.
-------
3-2
3.1 VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
Table 12 lists individual vehicle information by city. The
following is a description of the various abbreviations used in the headings.
HEADING
S
C
CAR
R
RUN
DATE
YR
CD
MAKE
CID
INRT
DESCRIPTION
Test site--city in which vehicles were tested.
Contractor performing tests.
This is a four-digit number assigned each test vehicle at each
facility. All Project 2050 car numbers used zero (0) as the
first digit. The order and format of test vehicles in this
section are identical to that in all sections of the Appendix.
This arrangement is used to permit each determination of vehicle
identification.
Number 1 in this column indicates a replicate test was performed.
RUN is a four-digit sequential run number.
This is a six-digit number showing year, month and day.
This is a two-digit number indicating the model year of the test
vehicle.
This is a two-digit number showing the EPA-assigned make code.
This is a four-character word specifying the make of vehicle.
The first four characters of the vehicle make are always to be
used. For example: Wildcat =' WILD; Ford LTD = LTD; Pontiac
LeMans = LEMA, etc.
This is a three-digit number indicating the cubic inch displacement
of the test vehicle. In the case of small displacement engines,
round off to the nearest unit displacement. For example:
Volkswagen = 96.6 cubic inches displacement. Input should be 097.
This indicates the number of carburetor barrels or Venturis. If
a given vehicle has fuel injection, a "0" is inserted instead of
the number for Venturis. A vehicle with multiple carburetion
would be entered as total number of Venturis. Example:
3-2 BBLs = 6.
This is a single-digit number.
used. A 1 = automatic; 3, 4 =
It indicates the type of transmission
manual, specify number of gears.
INRT designates the inertia of the vehicle as a four-digit number.
Correct inertia may be obtained from the Federal Register,
Volume 35, No. 219, Part II, page 17,296.
-------
3-3
HP HP is the road horsepower setting for the given test vehicle on the
dynamometer. The Federal Register will provide the correct load
settings.
WB This is a two-digit number indicating the wet bulb temperature
in op.
DB This is a two-digit number indicating the dry bulb temperature
in °F.
BARM This is a four-digit number indicating the barometric pressure
in inches of mercury.
CY Indicates the number of cylinders in the test vehicle engine.
A single-digit number.
AC A single-digit number to indicate the presence of an air conditioning
system on the test vehicle. 1 = equipped with air conditioner;
2 = no air conditioner.
EV This is a single-digit number to indicate whether or not the test
vehicle is equipped with an evaporative emissions control device.
1 = the vehicle is equipped with such a device; 2 = no evaporative
emissions device present.
EX EX is a single-digit which indicates the presence of an exhaust
emissions control system. 1 = exhaust emissions control present;
2 = no exhaust controls.
PC This indicates the presence of a positive crankcase ventilation
system. 1 = PCV system present; 2 = no PCV control unit.
ODOM This is a five-digit number indicating the odometer reading of
the test vehicle at the start of the test.
FT A two-digit number indicating the fuel tank capacity of the
test vehicle. Round off to the nearest gallon.
IRPM Idle speed in revolutions per minute measured in drive or neutral.
DN Drive or neutral. 1 = drive; 2 = neutral.
DWL Distributor ignition dwell in degrees, 0 = electronic ignition
IGNT Basic ignition timing; + indicates before top center;
- indicates after top center. Absence of + or - indicates
that timing was before top center.
-------
3-4
10% LOAD Indicates 10% load added. 1 = yes; 2 = no.
ET This indicates that evaporative emissions tests were performed.
1 indicates evaporative test performed; 2 indicates no evaporative
test performed.
-------
TABLE 12
VEHICLE INFORMATION "SUMMARY
LOS ANGELES
s c
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 -1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1.
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
CAP R
1
;•
3
4
5
L
7
S
o
1 •-.••
11
12
13
15
16
18
1?
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
30 R
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
33
39
40
41
42
42 P
43
44.
45
45 R
46
47
43
49
R'.'N
1
5
3
4
6
i ;
7
3
543
o
14
59 O
13
16
18
26
19
2O
21
28
29
541
32
33
35
37
•34
39
44
38
43
45
74
61
62
65
70
72
73
78
76
S3
30
36
90
119
37
1 05
93
132
DATE
73 212
73
73
73
~;-.-
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7:3
73
73
73
73
73
~r •?
2 1 3
212
212
213
214
213
214
6 1
214
215
6 3
215
216
216
222
221
221
221
222
222
6 1
223
223
226
226
226
227
228
227
3 1
228
3 3
3 6
3 7
3 7
3 3
3 S
3 3
3 9
3 9
312
312
313
314
316
313
315
314
320
.'R
70
70
70
63
70
66
72
72
72
70
66
72
66
67
72
68
71
69
7O
66
71
72
68
72
68
72
69
71
71
69
71
69
69
70
66
68
71
71
67
7O
67
67
66
71
70
70
71
69
69
69
CD
16
3
3
1
i :;
.i
4
6
3
3
14
3
1
6
10
6
1
3
3
R
12
5
10
3
6
6
3
3
6
6
6
2
3
6
16
14
5
5
6
3
3
ert
12
6
6
6
S
3
6
MAKE
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
BU I C
RAME
FORD
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
DATS
CHEV
BUIC
FORD
DODG
FORD
EU I C
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
PLYM
PONT
DODG
CHEV
FORD
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
FORD
FORD
CADI
MERC
FORD
VOLK
DATS
PONT
PONT
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
PLYM
FORD
FORD
FORD
MERC
CHEV
FORD
MOD
MAVE
PEET
C 1 0
CAPP
P. I1.1 1
AMER
MAVE
CUTL
COUN
MALI
IMPA
1200
IMPA
SKYL
PINT
MONA
LTD
SKYL
IMPA
CHEL
COME
VALI
CATA
CORO
CAMA
MUST
MUST
VEGA
VEGA
MUST
TORI
GALA
COUP
COUG
MUST
BEET
2402
SAFA
FIRE
MAVE
CHEL
CHEL
CATA
DUST
TORI
TOR I
HAVE
MARC!
CHEL
LTD
CID
9~*
~.V: "
327
455
232
302
350
400
307
327
72
327
340
122
383
429
350
350
283
302
318
400
360
327
302
302
140
140
200
351
390
472
351
239
91
146
400
326
250
250
250
389
313
351
351
250
390
350
390
' ' T
1 1
1 •?
2 1
4 1
4 1
2. 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 4
4 1
4 1
2 4
4 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 4
1 4
1 1
2 1
4 1
4 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 4
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
4 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
4 1
2 1
2 1
IMP1
2000
4< >00
4('?0
'4500
27'50
?000
3500
5000
3500
4000
2000
4000
3500
2250
4500
4000
3500
4OOO
3500
2750
300O
4500
4000
3000
3500
3000
2500
2500
3000
4000
4000
5000
350'"1
3000
2000
2750
5500
'3500
2750
3500
2500
4500
3000
3500
3500
2750
4500
3500
4000
Hc- i.iri
;:
12.
13.
14
•f.
1 1.
12.
14.
12.
13.
8.
12.
12
9.
12.
13.
12.
12.
11.
10.
1O.
14.
12.
10.
12
10.
o
9.
10.
13.
13.
14.
11.
10.
8.
9
< "•
1 1.
C;
1 1.
11.
14
11.
I 2.
12.
o
14.
12
12.
'-:
0
2
o
3
3
7
3
2
3
0
3
-7
~J
2
3
0
2
9
3
0
o
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
"2.
-7
2
3
3
o
9
2
•".•
2
^j
0
3
3
3
9
0
3
0
.-. '-.
65
;.5
A. ]•
65
67
67
65
i.5
67
66
67
64
63
61
61
65
65
66
66
65
63
64
66
65
63
64
68
66
66
65
66
66
64
62
65
65
:.A
64
64
63
61
62
63
65
61
63
64
64
3B
30
85
85
81
81
83
34
83
79
83
82
78
85
80
76
79
82
80
80
76
76
78
76
78
76
78
77
78
78
76
78
79
76
76
78
78
79
78
77
73
78
-78
73
78
77
76
79
82
33
77
r
30
3'
3,,
3«
3"
3i •
3o
30.
30
30
30
30.
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
31.
30
31
30
30
29
30
30
30
29
29
29
30
30
29
29
29
29
3O
29
30
30
29
03
20
03
09
21
27
20
31
00
30
20
00
28
18
28
18
00
00
00
20
15
00
27
27
07
00
08
07
12
80
28
10
92
01
1 1
13
97
83
37
01
03
99
97
93
93
19
89
20
00
98
c
V
o
4
3
8
3
O
8
3
8
S
8
4
3
8
4
8
S
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
4
4
6
8
8
8
8
8
4
6
3
3
6
6
6
8
8
8
8
6
S
8
8
A E
C V
2 1
2 1
2 1
I 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
2 2
1 2
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 1
1 1
2 2
2 I
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 2
E
X
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
P
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM
25724
30034
40193
60072
37134
52066
5873
20992
6074
33512
74400
5460
93974
85988
16982
65620
20931
63641
51638
54443
17454
17495
6435O
19513
73485
19816
23519
17400
17501
60812
13857
51484
6085
40668
14419
70448
25068
47055
51876
40994
73505
78523
63126
30339
33400
38423
21810
52032
29970
49331
FT
20
10
23
24
21
16
16
19
21
18
20
10
20
20
10
24
23
24
23
20
16
16
27
23
18
19
20
12
12
16
18
25
26
20
16
10
10
23
19
14
20
20
27
17
20
20
16
24
20
23
500
925
675
600
650
49O
625
750
500
600
450
775
550
675
375
500
425
575
550
450
480
750
575
425
425
575
500
1150
1150
650
60O
650
600
475
550
16OO
575
725
475
700
500
500
600
625
650
650
700
65O
475
600
D
N
1
^
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DWL
54
29
35
2o
30
35
28
28
28
20
49
28
33
36
27
32
31
33
45
32
31
33
0
29
32
3O
33
33
39
28
25
35
31
28
6O
37
30
29
46
2O
20
26
31
30
30
36
30
28
3O
IGNT
11
-10
2
C:
3
—3
16
4
7
7
12
5
7
10
7
7
-6
2
4
3
-6
3
-2
-4
10
-12
4
8
8
6
0
6
-10
o
0
2
5
8
3
-4
4
4
3
7
8
8
5
3
10
2
L E
D T
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 2
2 1
2 2
1 2
1 1
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 1
1 2
2 1
2 2
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
-------
12
'.'EHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
LOS ANGELES
S C
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
CAR R
50
51
52
53
54
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
62 R
63
64
65
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
34
86
37
38
89
90
91
92
93
?4
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
RUN
1 07
116
1 *i*^
506
134
145
146
153
163
183
164
187
198
190
201
206
210
211
214
212
218
23O
229
231
250
240
231
252
257
259
254
260
263
265
266
268
272
273
269
274
275
276
277.
299
283
295
291
234
292
293
DATE
~r*?
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
315
316
319
524
320
321
321
322
323
326
323
326
327
326
327
323
323
328
323
328
329
330
33O
330
4 2
4 2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 5
4 5
4 5
4 5
4 5
4 5
4 5
4 6
412
4 8
411
410
4 S
410
411
YR
67
63
67
63
71
71
i6
70
66
69
70
71
71
70
70
66
70
70
68
69
69
69
71
66
71
71
68
71
69
72
70
72
68
70
66
71
63
70
71
70
67
63
71
67
68
69
69
71
70
69
CD
6
i
3
5
3
10
4
6
16
5
6
3
3
3
5
12
3
4
6
5
4
3
15
5
6
16
12
1
4
6
13
1
6
10
1
3
4
1
16
12
4
6
12
16
8
1
16'
6
0
3
MAKE
FORD
PUIC
MERC
PONT
CHEV
DODO
FORD
FORD
VOLK
PONT
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
PLYM
CHEV
OLDS
FORD
PONT
OLDS
CHEV
TOYO
PONT
FORD
VOLK
PLYM
BUIC
OLDS
FORD
ftHER
BUIC
FORD
DODO
BUIC
CHEV
OLDS
BUIC
VOLK
PLYM
OLDS
FORD
PLYM
VOLK
MERC
BUIC
VOLK
FORD
CHRY
CHEV
MOD
FAIR
SKYL
COLO
LEMA
IMPA
SHIN
MUST
FALC
BUG
CATA
GALA
IMPA
IMP A
CHEL
LEMA
VALI
EL C
CUTL
FAIR
CATA
VIST
NOVA
CORO
VENT
LTD
BUS
FURY
CENT
DELT
LTD
AHBA
SKYL
GALA
DART
SPEC
NOVA
DELT
RIVI
BUG
SPOR
DELT
TORI
SATE
KARM
MONG
RIVI
BUS
PINT
300
IMPA
CID
239
350
410
350
350
3 1 P
2.00
302
73
400
351
350
350
402
350
225
307
350
302
400
350
230
113
339
351
97
318
455
455
429
304
330
390
225
340
350
455
455
97
383
425
390
225
91
302
430
°7
93
440
327
•}
"•
"i
4
~>
-/
2
1
2
1
2
2
4
4
4
2
1
2
2
2
2
4
1
2
2
2
1
2
4
2
4
2
2
4
1
4
2
2
4
1
2
2
4
1
1
2
4
1
1
4
*?
T
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
INRT
3500
350':'
4500
4000
4500
3000
3000
3500
2750
4000
4000
4000
4000
3500
4000
3000
3500
4000
3500
4OOO
45OO
30OO
250O
4000
4000
3OOO
35OO
4500
4OOO
43OO
40OO
40OO
4OOO
3000
3500
3500
4500
4500
2000
4500
4500
3500
3500
2000
3500
4500
3000
2250
4500
4000
HP
1!
11.
14
12
14.
10
10
11.
8.
13
13
13.
13.
11.
12
10.
11
13.
11.
13.
12.
10.
9
13.
13.
10
11
14.
13.
14.
12
13.
13.
10
11.
12.
14.
14.
g.
14.
14
11.
11.
3.
1 1.
14.
10
3.
14.
12.
2
--T
0
•j
3
3
2
S
2
2
2
2
2
O
3
2
2
2
2
7
3
4
2
2
3
2
0
2
0
0
2
2
3
2
3
0
0
3
0
0
2
"f
3
2
0
3
3
0
0
MB
'-.'-
'-.~!
64
':H
66
67
43
61
67
63
63
65
64
65
62
64
60
65
61
66
66
63
66
66
62
66
64
62
64
63
66
63
58
61
60
59
64
62
63
66
65
64
66
65
59
62
65
62
63
65
DB BARM
32 30.
76 3"
79 3>-
76 3i'.
83 3--.
77 30
78 30.
77 30.
81 30.
76 30.
76 30.
76. 30
7flf 30.
77: 30.
77 30
78 30
76 29
8O 2-
79 2Q.
8%-29.
sir so.
7^30.
77 30.
82 30.
77 30
77' 30.
77-30.
7*. 30
8* 30.
79 i 30.
83730
85' 30.
79 30.
77 30
80 30
78 30.
79 30.
76 30.
81 30.
79 30.
79 30.
76 30.
76 30.
82 :-.o.
82 30
77 30.
81 30.
34 30.
79. 30.
84 30.
"2 2
22
06
09
02
20
18
03
12
05
16
05
00
01
00
05
98
97
98
97
15
22
19
22
21
25
25
25
18
20
21
21
19
17
19
22
18
16
22
14
16
16
18
15
18
16
11
16
16
18
C M
Y C
S 2
3 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
3 2
6 2
8 2
4 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 2
8 1
6 2
8 1
8 1
8 2
8 1
8 2
6 2
4 2
8 1
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
6 1
8 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 1
3 1
6 2
4 2
8 2
8 1
4 2
4 2
8 1
3 1
E
1 1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
E F'
X C
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
ODOM
22869
33700
57937
56126
29000
23513
85645
32294
94926
71307
31641
38648
38659
34259
47180
96390
5OO65
43339
86771
19169
6O653
20219
49202
56127
43126
23331
37196
37443
35892
144O6
43723
24275
85850
19140
78204
52524
75210
45935
35482
40303
103716
82986
71406
56613
105586
62193
63306
34633
33729
53681
FT
20
20
25
22
24
17
16
20
10
27
23
24
24
18
19
18
18
19
20
26
20
18
12
26
23
10
24
23
25
22
20
20
25
18
20
16
20
21
10
23
25
20
21
10
20
25
10
12
24
24
IRPM
575
480
650
475
600
600
525
600
800
675
7OO
700
700
1050
6OO
45O
40O
575
775
575
425
650
700
S3O
5SO
550
soo
65O
SOO
600
450
400
575
700
75O
6OO
45O
650
9OO
525
525
575
550
40O
625
600
1200
850
625
500
D
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
DHL IGNT
29
28
2?
19
28
32
38
36
47
31
28
3O
30
30
31
43
26
27
28
34
36
23
49
19
3O
65
26
26
31
31
30
30
3O
45
30
30
27
31
52
32
30
30
47
46
30
30
52
44
31
16
0
0
4
12
7
(.
'C
li
5
6
9
8
&
30
6
-3
-2
6
10
1
-4
0
5
11
5
10
-5
2
2
10
2
4
4
2
6
8
5
3
-5
3
6
5
i
0
6
-1
4
10
16
10
L E
D T
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 -
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2 o»
2 2 <7t
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
-------
TABLE 12
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
LOS ANGELES
S C
'.4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
-CAR R
102
103
104
105
106
107
103
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
117
118
119
120
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
13©
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
149 R
150
150 R
151
RUN
297
301
306
285
290
233
305
303
327
317
479
319
305
315
326
312
320
322
329
338
330
334
340
337
355
332
310
352
36O
595
369
371
376
3S2
417
414
461
433
439
45S
44O
442
524
444
446
448
454
450
456
451
-
DATE
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
411
412
412
410
410
410
412
412
417
416
517
416
412
416
417
413
416
416
417
418
417
417
418
417
420
417
413
419
420
6 9
423
423
425
426
5 1
5 1
511
5 3
5 4
510
5 7
5 7
530
5 3
5 3
5 9
510
5 9
510
5 9
,'F:
68
6?
63
71
68
67
72
72
70
70
72
67
66
66
67
68
66
70
72
68
72
67
66
67
70
67
72
67
69
72
67
67
71
69
63
71
72
71
71
72
69
71
72
71
67
69
69
63
68
70
CD
9
6
3
7
4.
12
3
t-
6
12
9
3
10
3
9
2
4
16
3
3
3
6
2
5
15
3
3
6
12
3
3
13
10
3
3
17
4
4
1
15
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
13
13
5
MAKE
CHRY
FORD
CHEV
LINC
FORD
PLYM
CHEV
FORD
FORD
PLYM
CHRY
CHEV
DODG
MERC
CHRY
CADI
OLDS
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CADI
PONT
TOYO
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
PLYM
CHEV
CHEV
AMER
DODG
CHEV
CHEV
OPEL
OLDS
OLDS
BUIC
TOYO
PLYM
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
RAMB
RAMB
PONT
MOD
NEWP
MUST
EL C
CONT
MUST
FURY
IMPA
TORI
SVAN
BARR.
ROYA
BELA
POLA
MONC
3OO
COUP
CUTL
BEET
MONT
IMPA
CHEL
LTD
SEDA
BONN
CORO
MALI
CONC
MUST
SATE
VEGA
CAPR
RAMB
MONA
CAMA
NOVA
KADE
CUST
NINE
RIVI
CELI
BARR
CAMA
MALI
MALI
IMPA
BEL
BEL
REBE
REBE
TEMP
-'
C I D
331.
302
307
460
239
31S
400
351
302
318
400
250
333
390
333
472
330
97
350
307
350
390
429
4OO
116
327
330
289
318
140
327
232
333
307
250
116
455
455
453
120
318
350
350
350
283
327
327
290
290
350
V
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
4
4
2
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
1
2
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
'^
f
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
INRT
4000
3000
3500
5000
3000
4000
4500
4000
4OOO
3500
4500
4000
40OO
4000
45OO
5000
3500
2000
4000
4000
3500
40OO
5OOO
4500
25OO
3500
4000
300O
3500
2750
4000
3000
4500
35OO
3000
250O
5500
4500
4500
2500
3000
3500
3500
3500
4000
4000
4000
3500
3500
4000
HP
13
10.
11.
14
11
12.
14.
13.
12.
12.
14.
12
13.
13.
14.
14
11.
8
13
12.
12.
13.
14.
14.
9
11.
13.
10
12.
9.
12.
10
14.
1 1.
10.
9
15.
14.
14.
9.
10.
12.
12.
12.
12.
13.
13.
11.
11.
13.
i
.3
2
•7
;;:
0
o
2
0
3
0
0
2
2
O
7
2
3
2
0
3
2
7
0
4
2
2
3
3
o
0
3
0
2
3
4
3
0
0
4
3
3
3
3
0
2
2
2
2
2
WE"
62
63
63
66
64
62
64
63
63
61
66
64
64
61
65
67
63
64
63
58
63
63
58
63
61
63
63
60
59
67
63
63
62
63
63
63
66
64
64
64
61
65
65
64
66
63
65
65
65
66
3B
76
78
76
78
82
76
79
78
79
78
79
81
78
78
82
77
79
79
78
77
79;
81
80
79
77
79
79
8O.
80
79
79
78
76
79
79
77
81
80
79
76
76
79
79
77
81
76
78
80
31
80
C
A
•BARM V..C
30
30
30
30
30
30
30.
30
30
30.
30
30
30
30
3O
30
30.
30
:'30.
:30
•'30.
•'30.
29
30
49.
30.
30
30
30
30
30
30.
30
30.
30.
30.
30.
30.
30
29.
30
30
30.
30.
30
30.
30.
13
16
10
15
11
12
13
14
16
23
18
21
12
22
17
15
20
18
16
04
15
10
98
08
99
14
15
97
99
02
03
02
04
07
21
21
11
13
04
05
19
16
99
14
15
10
05
09
04
08
3
8
3
8
3
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
8
8
4
8
8
8
8
8
8
4
8
8
8
8
4
8
6
8
8
6
4
8
8
8
4
8
.8
8
8
8
8
8
S
8
8
1
2-
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
E E
V X
2 1
2 1
2 2
1 1
2 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
F
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM
76603
62073
31259
37905
53430
27214
34697
22666
113683
40393
16007
77114
52835
67927
99319
45502
110355
39471
9453
72163
6952
34804
72173
81366
43132
82778
13637
52127
51513
15943
78689
49112
23834
45283
53504
1947O
18740
40194
26865
13026
49747
33934
24134
25464
64889
80152
80163
49285
49296
46852
FT
24
20
-20
''23
16
25
24
20
20
18
24
24
25
25
25
26
20
10
19
24
19
25
26
27
12
20
18
16
19
11
24
16
23
18
18
11
23
24
24
13
IS
17
19
19
24
24
24
22
22
19
IRPM
425
525
450
5.75
600
500
500
400
425
575
500
550
425
500
575
475
425
725
550
475
5OO
4OO
450
550
350
350
573
53O
450
373
325
60O
325
450
600
925
500
550
575
675
700
500
35O
450
475
550
550
525
525
450
D
N
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DWL IGNT
27
36
22
27
33
32
29
27
26
24
32
35
25
26
29
32
30
56
26
29
30
29
28
28
59
32
28
37
32
3O
26
34
32
25
34
53
28
30
30
54
31
34
29
32
31
27
27
30
30
37
7
-4
10
4
15
10
4
?
7
4
4
4
5
6
5
.6
10
0
9
4
9
41
8
13
9
1
11
4
0
8
2
12
4
4
-3
18
6
4
8
6
5
7
7
7
6
3
3
-5
-5
-1
L E
D T
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 1
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 1
1 2
1 2
2 1
2 2
1 2
1 1
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
-------
TABLE 12
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
LOS ANGELE?
s c
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
CAR R
-151 R
152
153
154
155
156
157
157 R
158
159
16O
161
162
163
164
165
167
163
169
169 R
170
170 R
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
RUN
453
457
464
459
465
466
467
463
470
469
476
472
473
473
483
481
526
502
515
521
507
519
513
516
523
535
531
594
587
599
DATE
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
510
510
510
510
514
514
514
515
515
515
516
516
517
516
518
513
530
523
524
525
524
525
524
525
530
531
531
6 9
6 8
6 9
YR
70
71
72
71
71
T2
66
66
72
71
72
67
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
69
70
69
70
66
72
72
CD
5
4
§
o
5
1 '?
.;:
•1;
3
6
10
10
5
2
16
12
16
1
1
1
12
12
5
10
4
6
10
6
3
6
MAKE
FONT
OLDS
MERC
CHEV
PONT
AMER
CHEV
CHE1.'
CHEV
FORD
DODG
DODG
PONT
CADI
VOLK
PLYM
VOLK
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
DODG
OLDS
FORD
DODO
FORD
CHEV
FORD
MOD
TEMP
DELT
MONG
KING
FIRE
HORN
IMFfi
IMF A
CAMA
GALA
DART
DART
LEMA
SEDA
SUPE
FURY
411
ELEC
ELEC
ELEC
DUST
DUST
WACO
CHAR
DELT
MUST
CHAR
COUN
IMP A
E-10
CID
350
350
400
400
350
253
283
233
350
351
225
225
350
472
97
360
102
455
4SS
433
340
340
40O
44O
350
250
440
390
402
302
V T
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
4 1
1 4
2 1
0 1
4 1
4 1
4 1.
4 1
4 1
2 1
4 1
2 1
1 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
2 1
INRT
4000
4500
4500
500O
350<'
3000
400' '
4000
4000
4000
3000
3000
4000
5000
2250
4000
2750
5000
5000
5000
3300
3300
5000
4000
4500
3000
4000
4500
45OO
4000
HP
13. 2
14. 0
14 0
14. 7
12. 3
10. 3
12 0
12. 0
13 2
12. 0
10. 3
10. 3
13. 2
14. 7
8 8
13. 2
9. 9
14. 7
14 7
14. 7
11. 2
11. 2
14 7
12. 0
14 0
10. 3
12. 0
12. 7
14. O
12 0
WB
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
65
65
65
65
64
65
65
65
64
64
63
62
64
63
64
63
63
64
64
65
67
68
67
c
DB EARM Y
76 30.
78' 30.
78;' 30.
77 30.
77 30.
76 30
79 30.
79 30.
80 30
80 30
78 30.
rt 30.
78 30.
7&30.
7ft' 30.
76 30.
78 30.
79 30.
T6 30.
76. 30.
zi'3°
781.30.
7* 30.
76/ 30.
7^29
76 30.
77 30.
80i 30
72' 30.
78 30.
05 8
05 8
10 8
03 3
12 8
15 6
18 8
23 8
30 8
30 8
24 6
27 6
22 8
27 8
12 4
16 8
OO 4
09 8
OO 8
01 8
06 8
03 8
00 8
03 8
99 8
02 6
OO 8
02 8
02 8
00 3
A E
C V
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 1
E F
X C
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
ODOM
46862
27108
19191
33170
18321
10170
79312
79329
21305
41303
5744
74982
18970
26642
1O9O6
30587
15641
44836
24295
24306
24237
24248
17148
73659
14450
45O37
26328
89646
13735
7620
FT
19
24
21
23
17
16
20
20
17
23
18
18
20
28
11
23
13
25
23
25
18
18
23
19
24
20
19
25
24
20
IRPM
450
525
50O
475
650
550
425
425
500
450
6OO
500
573
60O
11OO
625
525
50O
530
530
600
&OO
330
4OO
500
5OO
325
575
523
450
D
N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
DWL I GNT
37
28
30
14
30
34
SO
30
^.9
33
40
44
23
23
52
O
46
31
30
30
3±
36
31
34
29
26
26
26
29
33
-1
6
?
3
>
4
I
7
14
4
3
13
8
: 5
-3
7
4
6
6
11
11
11
-3
8
8
12
16
7
12
L
D
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
E
T
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1«
li
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
-------
TABLE 12
•.•=.:••. ICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
C; T {_ ij' i T •'•
•I-
5
5
5
5
5
5
s
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
'5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
,-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
!
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CAR R
1
2
3
4
5
6
-7
3
o
10.
11
12
14
16
17'
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
,23
29
30
31
32
34
36
37
38.
39
40
41
44
45
46
17
43
49
50
52
53
54
55
55 R
56
RUN
CT
1
6
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
79
17
18
19
21
20
24
26
22
30
23
31
27
2£
29
35
33
37
38
36
40
41
42
45
49
51
52
53
54
•54
57
60
61
62
• 49
71
65
r,.
^ ^
73
73
73
73
73
7'?
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73'
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73.
73
73
•-T-7;
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7?
.'re
13!
131
2 1
131
131
131
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
223
2 3
2 5
2 5
2 5
2 5
2 7
2 7
2 7
*? f,1
2 7
2' 9
2 3
2 S
2 8
2 9
2 9
212
212
212
213
213
213
214
214
215
211-
215
215
216
216
216
220
220
221
222
221
VR
,i,~*
72
'-. ;•
~*2
— 1
"2
~*-~.
^2
47
66
• '- 7
67
69
66
70
69
72
66
7O
69
68
69
72
68
72
71
72
66
72
67
66
67
72
67
63
46
6-S
67
63
66
67
/. -T
i'3
63
67
66
6'.?
i6
66
71
C'D
14
3
~-
1
5
iO
9
12
•3
6
3
10
1
16
10
3
8
3
3
6
13
2
1
16
2
7
15
3
14
6
5
o
16
4
• 1
3
^.
*5
*;.
10
12
6
12
4
. 3
6
-.3
S
s
6
MAKE
VOLK
CHE1.1
CAP I
GUI'"
POM'.
DODC
CHFY
FLYM
CHE1.1
FORD
CHFT.V
DODO
BUIC
VOLK
DODO
CHEV
MERC
CHEV
MERC
FORD
RAMB
CADI
BUIC
VOLK
CADI
LINC
TOYO
CHEV
DATS
FORD
PONT
CHRY
VOLK
OLDS
BUIC
CHEV'
FORD
PONT
FQNT
DODG
r'LYM
FORD
FLYM'
OLD?
CHEV
FORD
CHEV
MERC
MERC
FORD
MOD
BUS
IMF A
COLF
EL.E'I
C-'F: •-::•-:
DAFT
i^l'iF
bATE
MALI
MUST
CflMA
DART
ELEC
BEET
POLA
IMPA
MOMR
IHPA
COUC
COUN
AMBA
FLEE
SKYL
BEET
FLEE
CONT
CORO
BELA
510
COUN
CTO
NEW
BEET
VIST
LEsri
BELA
COUN
EXEC
CATA
CORO
EEL'.'
MUST
FUR/
DELM
CAPR
FALC
IMPA
COME
CC'ltE
.MUST
•- ' n
VI
350
.1 ~- >ri
T:T
455
225
400
?13
283
239
327
225
430
78
318
396
351
233
331
429
290
472
350
91
472
460
120
283
97
390
389
383
97
330
350
283
39'"*
400
400
333
^"7'j
2S9
v i V
350
327
200
327
239
289
351
,..
1
2
4
4
4
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
4
1
2
4
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
1
4
4
2
2
1
2
4
2
i
2
4
2
d
2
2
2
2
4
^
2
^
i
2
2
~
2
T
•1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1-
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
INRT
2250
4300
5500
5000
4500
3000
4500
3500
3500
3000
3500
3000
430O
2000
4500
4500
5000
3300
35OO
450O
35OO
55OO
4000
2250
5500
5000
2500
4000
2230
4500
4000
4500
2250
4000
4500
4000
4500
4500
4000
4000
3500
3000
4000
4500
4000
3000
4500
3500
3500
3500
u;i
14
15.
14
^ -i
i '.'.
i 1
11
12
10.
12.
10.
14
S.
12.
14.
14.
11.
12.
14
12.
15.
13.
3.
15
14
o
12.
8.
12.
12.
14.
O.
13.
14
12.
12.
14.
13.
13.
11.
10.
12.
14.
12.
10.
14.
11.
11.
12.
•j
0
•J
•*
3-
0
2
3
3
3
3
0
3
~7
0
7
2
3
0
3
3
2
o
3
7
4
0
8
•j
0
o
3
2
0
0
7
0
2
2
2
3
0
0
0
3
0
2
2
3
WE
i-^|
60
i2
67
57
62
59
62
61
53
53
58
61
63
55
55
5S
55
58
55
55
56
60
60
60
58
58
58
53
60
56
59
54
64
53
60
59
61
55
58
58
59
56
53
58
60
53
61
53
56
DB B,-f
79 2'
77 2T
79 2£.
75 '2?
78 '2T
SO 27-
74 ,23
73 28
74 -28.
76 "29.
70 2?
73-'?2r.
7*^9.
80&9
71 2?
71 2?
7i-s2r.
7lv-29-.
7t^9.
7602.?.
84«29
7w»?
8S?29.
76,^29.
8&&9.
73^29
73 729.
77s29.
7325?.
82^9.
77^29.
8O«29.
76 '29.
84,.29.
80 29.
79' 29.
73 29
80'- 29.
7t:'*28
77 ; 29.
74 29-
74 29.
70 29.
7O';29.
73F*29.
79. 29.
73 "29.
73 '2?.
76;, 29.
75; 29.
•M
17
13
•-•3
15
15
lo
S6
31
80
00.
05
08
13
25
44
44
38
40
38
50
45
55
60
50
60
65
65
65
6O
60
•10
35
40
25
25
20
19
20
45
50
50
50
78
78
78
60
63
65
40
65
:" A
Y C
4 2
3 2
8 1
8 1
:? 1
6 2
3 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
6 2
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
81
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 1
4 2
8 1
4 2
8 1
3 2
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 1
8 2
8 1
8 1
8 2
8 1
8 1
3 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
6 2
8 1
8 2
8 2
8 1
E E
V X
2 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 Z
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 1
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 2
1 1
F
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM
64532
29814
82552
16073
13719
11352
5706
40S 1
35920
21645
4S371
41967
70624
26622
42837
50041
5662
67284
450OO
39895
43430
38233
3233
36231
14464
48394
11700
76000
7035
57355
104OOO
81967
9039
100148
50000
39452
65560
88630
48194
75345
64329
49729
69628
18413
65265
57020
53900
41451
41470
19290
FT
IO
23
26
25
24
17
24
21
20
16
18
16
23
10
23
24
24
20
22
22
22
26
20
10
26
23
13
20
12
25
20
25
10
20
25
20
20
27
27
20
19
16
24
24
22
16
24
20
20
20
IRPM
?50
600
530
475
65O
570
650
700
55O
615
435
60O
525
1200
900
530
673
500
575
625
3OO
11OO
700
9OO
650
650
65O
600
7OO
575
725
525
1025
700
575
525
575
600
450
570
525
700
550
623
60O
500
625
7OO
700
65O
D
N
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DWL 1
43
30
29
24
29
48
,••,
O
3O
31
28
30
32
43
3O
32
32
28
29
29
30
26
3O
55
30
29
52
32
5O
3O
29
SC-
SI
29
35
32
22
31
24
29
29
35
31
3O
31
4O
33
33
33.
32
GNT
6
S
It
•i
1 -_
j
4
L
D
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
i
2
I
1
1
2
1
2
2
i
E
T
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2'
2 r
2 «>
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 •
2
2
-------
-'iii-Lc 1-
SUMMARY
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 :
5 1
5 :
5 -.
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1.
5 1
5 1
•3 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
•5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
CAP. R
57
59
4.0
61
'.2
'. ,t;
-.a
65
66
67
.;,§. .::
69*
70
72
73
7}
75
76
78
79
79 R
SO
81
32
33
34
85
95 R
86
37
38
3?
90
91
92
93
94
95
95 R
96
07
93
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
F.:j'!
73
74
7&
77
7 '3
32
33
84
95
86
113
S9
93
94
10?
97
96
102
107
108
159
101
101
1 1 0
109
116
121
in
113
115
1 17
124
122
120
123
125
127
135
13O
12S
1 32
131
129
13.6
13-1
133
137
139
-?'
73
73
73
T '.*
77
TO
73
73
73
73
73
73
TO
73
TO
73
^S
.73
73
73.
73
73
73
TO
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
TO
73
73
73
73
TO
TO
73
TO
73
73
73
73
7?
73
73
73
221
221
222
222
223
224
22~'
223
226
226
3 1
227
3 5
227
3 1
3 1
3 2
3 1
3 1
3 2
3 2
3" 3
^343
3 2
3 2
0 0
3 '•'•
3 5
3 6
3 5
3 5
3 5
3 5
3 6
3 6
3 6
3 6
3 6
3 7
3 3
3 7
O T
3 7
O T
3 7
3 S
3 S
0 0
3 3
•3 e
TO
4.3
63
-'- A
•:9
-1':'
— i
:9
i?'
49
6?
63
:9
70
69
70
6S
70
72
69
67
67
71
63
7O
70
6?
48
63
66
69
63
6S
72
4.8
69
69
70
69
.69
70
71
67
69
70
69
69
~"2
66
70
i
•3
V
~.
'j
10
1 J2
4
0
7
! 2
i
9
12
3
12
3
3
4
10
o
1 ;.
16
3
13
3
3
3
3
6
.1
4
13
i
1
16
6
13
3
3
o
5
17'
4
5
N-.". I ' C
BU i ':
FOR:-
MERC
- HE'.'
•Z-HEV
-OH:D
FQRL.
PONT
DODO
FLYM
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
FLYM
FORD
FORD
CHRY
PLYM
CHEV
PLYM
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
DODG
CHEV
VOLK
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
RAME
MERC
CHE'.1
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
FORD
OLDS
AMER
EUIC
EUIC
VOLK
FORD
PAMB
CHEV
CHEV
CHE'.'
FONT
AHEF.
OLDS
PONT
FAIR
COUG
MALI
CHEL
rajsT
PINT
30NN
3UFE
SATE
TORO
CHEL
NOVA
SPOR
VAN
MUST
NEWF
FURY
'.•EGA
SATE
BELA
BELA
NINE
CORO
IMPA
BEET
BEET
BELA
BELA
CLAS
MONR
CAPIA
BELA
KING
LTD
GALA
CUTL
HORN
3KYL
SKYL
BEET
MA'.'E
P.EBE
CONC
IMP A
CAM A
LENA
HORN
DELT
CATA
455 4
302 2
194 1
- j ' .' 7 2
3v2 "4
j 22 2
;oo 4
333 4.
313 2
455 4
230 1
230 1
31S 2
302 2
250 1
333 2
31£ 2
140 2
313 2
327 2
327 2
455 4
313 2
350 2
97 1
91- 1
307 2
307 2
232 1
428 4
327 2
307: 2
400 2
390 2
302 2
350 4
232 1
350 2
350 2
97 1
200 1
232 2
307 2
350 2
327 2
350 2
232 1
330 2
400 2
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
INFT
5000
400-
350'
350-
300'
300' '
200<
4OOO
3500
3500
4500
3500
3000
4OOO
3000
3000
40OO
3500
2250
3000
3500
350O
5000
3000
4000
1750
1750
3500
3300
3000
4OOO
2750
35OO
•50OO
4000
35OO
3500
3000
4000
4000
2000
2750
4000
4000
4000
3500
4000
2000
4500
1500
C A E E F
Hp WE JB B-'PM Y C V X C
!i 7 53 73 2:' •-••'•• 31111
1 J 2 59 77^ 2 '-' ^5 8 1 2 1 1
12. 3 5° 82 2r ?5 3 1 2 1 1
1 L 2 60 77 29. 20 62221
J : . 3 58 76 .29. 30 31211
Jv. ? 53 73 2" 30 31211
3. "J 61 73 2'- 30 42111
13. 2 55 77' 2C. 35 81211
11- 2 53 75 2~. 65 3221 1
12. 3 '59 77,2V 65 8 1 2 1 1
14. 0 61 72 2? 35 8 1 2 1 1
11. 2 59 7%29. 65 6 1 2 1 1
10. 3 64 74029. 21 622.1 1
13. 2 54 72V29. 65' 8 1 2 1 1
1C. : :-2 73 2- 40 8 2 2 1 1
1 0. o 57 72 2- 40 6 1 2 1 i
12. 0 67 77' 2? 25 8 1 2 1 1
12. 3 59 74 29. 28 8 1 2 1 1
3. 8 60 78,- 29. 25 4 2 1 1 1
10. 3 65 8Ot29. 25 8 1 2 1 1
11. 2 60 6fip29 25 8 2 2 2 1
11. 2 63 7^29 30 8 2 2 2 1
14. 7 62 73 29. 25 8 1 1 1 1
10. 3 63 77", .29. 25 8 2 2 1 1
12. 0 62 72" 29. 25 8 1 2 1 1
7. ~> 62 71-: 2'-' 35 4 2 2 1 1
7. 7 61 7i:.29 35 4 2 2 1 1
12. 3 62 7&29 30 8 1 2 1 1
12. 3 63 74*29 20 8 1 2 1 1
10 3 62 7W'29. 20 6222 1
13. 2 63 7^29. 25 8 1 2 I
9. 9 63 7^29. 20 8 2 2 1
12. 3 62 T4&29 20 8 1 2 1
14. 7 65 74 2'-. 05 811 1
13. 2 66 7? 29. 15 8 1 2 1
12. 3 66 78, 29 20 3 1 2 1 1
11 2 64 72 29 15 8 1 2 1 1
10. 3 65 74 29 05 6 1 2 1 1
12. 0 60 71. 29 20 8 1 2 1 1
12 0 59 70; 2f . 45 8 1 2 1 1
3. 3 61 76: 2i' 25 4 2 2 1 1
•••'. 9 59 7O 2v. 20 6 2 1 1 1
12. 0 58 71 2- 25 6 2 2 2 1
13. 2 i.0 74 -29. 25 8 1 2 1 1
13. 2 60 74 29 25 8 1 2 1 1
11.2 62 73 29 45 8 1 2 1 1
13. 2 56 7i>i 2*. 42 8 1 2 1 1
10. 3 65 75 2:' 10 6 1 1 1 1
12 7 62 72' 2^. 45 8 1 2 2 1
1 4. 0 63 74*29 45 8 1 2 1 1
ODOM
11382
65533
97253
37700
5024i
32S4'I>
1 2700
73985
6924 1
43886
57343
38929
63000
26648
44O3S
42730
73390
48494
8365
51976
57088
57103
30188
55655
40391
24912
59444
56321
56337
67434
1950O
35711
81200
12320
42075
53418
14429
34811
40378
40396
47523
18986
100884
39873
34500
40679
40000
7471
970OO
23739
FT
24
20
16
20
20
16
1 1
27
19
19
24
2O
16
24
20
20
24
24
11
19
24
24
24
19
24
10
10
24
24
19
24
18
24
24
22
22
20
.19
20
20
10
15
22
20
25
18
22
16
25
25
IP.PM
675
525
525
525
525
575
700
525
700
700
575
500
40O
600
600
600
60O
525
475
620
50O
500
700
600
500
1000
10OO
700
700
6OO
650
650
700
6OO
60O
70O
600
500
600
600
1200
750
900
600
700
550
600
700
600
575
D
N
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
^
2
^1
i
i
i
i
i
i
DUiL
32
24
3O
2 '
J y
23
30
31
32
21
25
23
28
28
3O
31
31
28
3O
30
3O
37
30
50
52
25
25
37
29
30
23
30
29
28
29
28
28
28
57
•5 '".•
35
29
32
30
17
19
2'r'
23
tGNT
r.
0
-2
4
-
-•;•
c
£.
9
4
6
0
c
,*.
t,
C;.
4
9
12
4
4
4
5
4
o
?
8
6
4
4
6
5
6
4
5
4
4
10
10
5
-6
5
2
5
14
9
1
1O
-3
L E
D T
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
22
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
x 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
-------
TABLE :2
VEHICLE INFORMATION S'JMMARY
5
•5
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
•S
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
S
5
5
3
5
5
5
3
5
5
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CAP R
107
10S
109
110
110 R
111
1 12
113
1 14
115
116
117.
118
119
120 •
121
122
124
125
126
127
123
129
130
131
131 R
132
133
134
135
137
133
140
141
142
144
145
145 R
146
147
14S
143 R
149
151
152
153
•154
155
.157
'153 "
' RUN
14?
145
144
147
151
154
153
155
152
IS."--
157
438
160
162
163
164
Ii9
165
164.
167
168
171
170
181
182
189
173
174
176
175
177
.179
•185
133
137
183
192
196
191
195
193
197
190
202
200
201
199
203
211
-207
DATE
7'? "•'. 9
~^3
73
73
TT-
73
73
73
73
73
-TO
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
~"2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
.73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
.73
73
73
3 9
3 429
72''. 2'--
70*:2'?
73*29
7S&2?
7^329
73»2'?.
zHF29-
7S&29.
TJiG'?
TrafeT'
7ttjjj29.
73*^9
7$' 28.
75tj:2S.
73$28.
TSSrjZS.
73g28.
7Q&ZS.
7^29.
7fflC9.
7*129.
7<®29.
8Qs29.
73v29.
§9.
9
9.
9.
74*28'
74K129.
74^.29.
74 '29^
7#29.
73T29
76 29
7^ 29.
77" 2'?.
73.2?.
76; 29.
70- 29
74-2?'
7fc 2'?
72 29
8C' 2?'
75*29.
30
35
25
45
45
-15
45
45
45
40
25
22
10
00
00
00
90
9O
90
75
75
95
10
10
00
05
05
10
10
10
03
12
90
00
10
15
3.0
15
30
15
25
12
20
22
20
20
20
40
45
C A
Y C
4 2
8 1
8 1
4 2
4 2
6 2
6 2
8 1
8 2
6 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
6 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 1
8 1
82
8 1
6 2
6 2
8
8
8
8
6
8 1
8 1
6 2
S 1
8 1
8 1
8 1
4 1
3 1
8 1
8 1
4 2
3 1
8 1
3 1
8 1
4 2
8 1
8 2
e
V
i
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1.
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
E
X
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
P
C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM
9343
48000
32000
24877
24893
47717
51323
161O4
41696
50270
45920
270OO
8553
44369
20519
31380
20959
29756
14191
18493
19145
27000
17813
37942
22722
22734
7907
27744
31365
38624
8868
15376
30398
61956
45000
16021
32119
32136
3O975
39863
19681
19698
40837
13122
30325
24314
37360
12000
5449
70100
FT
11
25
20
10
10
20
20
25
15
18
24
25
24
25
20
19
24
20
10
23
25
25
24
24
17
17
18
20
19
19
16
16
16
18
20
23
25
22
10
22
23
23
10
19
24
19
24
10
19
24
IRPM
900
600
600
900
900
800
700
800
600
625
5OO
600
8OO
900
8OO
90O
7OO
625
900
525
625
6OO
6OO
600
850
850
65O
690
6OO
650
700
650
723
950
830
600
65O
650
600
775
673
675
930
600
550
500
575
925
650
675
D
N
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
DWL IGNT
4~ 12
29
21
49
49
37
33
28
29
32
31
28
30
29
27
30
30
29
48
30
31
30
29
29
29
29
30
27
31
29
27
O
27
29
30
31
28
28
27
30
28
28
58
31
31
29
29.
SO
29
31
a
8
0
0
t
K
4
8
6
-6
1^
5
4
4
3
3
7
3
8
9
6
4
7
5
5
4
6
6
5
4
3
4
3
6
5
3
5
3
3
6
6
9
4
5
4
'2
4
3
L E
D T
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
2 2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
1 2
1 2
2 2
1 2
2 2
-------
TABLE 12
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
3T LOUIS
S C
5 1
5 1
5 1
3 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
3 1
5 1
3 1
3 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
3 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
5 1
S 1
S 1
3 1
5 1
3 1
S 1
5 1
S 1
CAR R
1-59
160
162
164
145
165 R
166
lit R
167
its
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
133
184
185
186
187
188
C A £ E P D LE
RUM DATE YR CD MAKE MOD CID V T INRT HP WE DB.rBARM Y C V X C ODOM FT IRPM N DWL IGNT D T
203 73 321 72 5 PONT LEtlfi 350 2 1 4000 13. 2 62 77*29 45 8 1 1 1 14200 20 800 1 28 512
213 73 322 68 6 FORD GALA 390 2 1 40OO 13 2 61 77^29. 50 8 1 2 1 74082 22 600 1 29 712
233 73 328 72 4 OLDS CUTL 350 2 1 4000 13. 2 66 79229 158111 10726 20 725 1 31 512
253 73 4 3 71 1 BUIC SKYL 35O 2 1 4OOO 13. 2 63 74'?29 158111 14686 2O 675 1 29 612
263 73 4 4 72 3 CHEV NOVA 350 2 1 3300 11. 2 61 73*29 14 8 2 1 1 19672 18 750 I 30 422
266 73 4 5 72 3 CHEV NOVA 350 2 1 35OO 11. 2 59 72/29 37 8 2 1 1 19686 18 750 1 3O * 2 2
269 73 4 5 70 6 FORD MAVE 25O 1 1 30OO 1O. 3 40 77£i9. 40 6 2 2 1 23394 16 650 1 3O £22
273 73 4 t 70 t, FORD MAVE 250 1 1 3000 10. 3 59 78^9. 32 6 2 2 1 23408 16 650 1 30 622
285 73 410 70 3 CHEV KING 35O 2 1 4300 12 7 61 79*29 40 8 1 21 54729 22 575 1 28 522
272 73 4 6 71 3 MERC MONR 40O 2 1 430O 140 59 75*29. 35 8 1 1 1 47797 22 700 1 31 612
291 73 411 70 15 TOYO CORO 113 2 4 23OO 9. 4 61 7&29. 55 4 1 2 1 34320 10 575 2 28 422
300 73 413 71 3 CHEV VEGA 140 1 1 2300 9. 4 60 7«g-29 60 4 2 1 1 13238 16 35O 1 28 322
333 73 417 71 3 CHEV NOVA 3O7 2 1" 3SOO 12. 3 67 7TO29 3O 8 1 1 1 56OOO 16 6OO 1 28 412
388 73 5 4 72 6 FORD GALA 331 2 1 40OO 13. 2 69 7®29 60 8 1 1 1 343OO 23 85O 1 28 7 1 2 w
389 73 5 4 71 14 DATS MAGO 97 2 4 2SOO 9 4 37 7^29 55 4 1 1 1 1 35066 10 800 2 53 322 —
397 73 5 3 67 6 FORD MUST 289 2 1 3OOO 10. 3 73 8»29 33 8 1 2 2 1 2OOOO 17 8OO 1 3O 5 2 2 **
392 73 5 4 66 5 PONT TEMP 326 2 3 3300 11. 2 60 8fflT29. 45 8 2 2 2 1 300OO 20 10OO 2 28 622
394 73 5 5 70 6 FORD FALC 3O2 2 1 4OOO 13. 2 63 7&29 47 8 1 2 1 1 39059 21 775 1 29 512
395 73 5 5 70 5 PONT CATA 350 2 1 43OO 14. 0 64 7Ag29 45 8 1 2 1 1 35878 25 8OO 1 3O 612
418 73 3 9 70 1 BUIC ESTA 455 4 1 5OOO 13. 4 63 7W29. 15 8 1 2 1 1 45553 24 60O 1 32 822
417 73 3 9 72 6 FORD GALA 331 2 1 450O 12. 7 66 9JS29 15 8 1 1 1 1 3100O 22 625 1 3O 622
412 73 3 9 68 5 PONT LEMA 350. 2 1 4OOO 1Z 0 66 7NR29. 20 8 1 2 1 1 73362 20 623 1 29 322
413 73 5 9 67 5 PONT LEMA 326 2 1 35OO 112 65 7^K9 20 8 2 2 2 1 70287 20 650 1 30 522
414 73 5 9 67 8 MERC MONR 390 4 1 40OO 12. 0 66 8z|fi9. 20 8 1 2 2 1 73344 23 623 1 3O 722
419 73 310 66 12 PLYM VALI 223 1 1 3000 10. 3 67 73829. 20 6 2 2 2 1 63130 18 673 1 3O 522
423 73 312 72 3 CHEV IMPA 434 4 1 45OO 12. 7 62 7»29 20 8 1 1 1 1 29304 24 650 I 32 622
424 73 311 71 4 OLDS CUTL 330 2 1 4000 13. 2 62 7®29 30 81111 26609 20 600 1 3O 712
428 73 312 71 5 PONT LEMA 330 2 1 4000 13. 2 63 73129 45 8 1 1 1 1 17OOO 20 650 1 31 712
447 73 318 67 1 BUIC LESA 340 4 1 4500 14. 0 61 7*29 18 8 1 2 2 1 61680 24 625 1 28 612
492 73 531 71 3 CHEV CAPR 4O2 4 1 4500 14. 0 62 7*29 42 8 1 1 '< 1 33566 24 580 1 31 12 1 2
-------
3-13
3.2 VEHICLE EXHAUST EMISSIONS RESULTS
Vehicle exhaust emissions results, Tables 13A and 13B, list exhaust
emissions test results in grams per mile for hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, carbon
dioxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, total oxides of nitrogen and total
oxides of nitrogen corrected for humidity.
-------
3-14
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EtriSSION TFST RESULTS IN rn.»M8 P£R MILE
LOS ANGELES
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
30R
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
42R
43
44
45
43R
44.
47
48
49
YR MAKE
70 FORD
70 VOLK
70 CHEV
68 CHEV
70 BUIC
66 RAMB
72 FORD
72 OLDS
72 FORD
70 CHEV
66 CHEV
72 DATS
66 CHEV
67 BUIC
72 FORD
63 DODG
71 FORD
69 BUIC
7O CHEV
66 CHEV
71 MERC
72 PLYM
68 PONT
72 DODG
68 CHEV
72 FORD
69 FORD
71 CHEV
71 CHEV
63 FORD
71 FORD
69 FORD
69 CADI
70 MERC
66 FORD
68 VOLK
71 DATS
71 PONT
67 PONT
70 FORD
67 CHEV
67 CHEV
66 PONT
71 PLYM
70 FORD
70 FORD
71 FORD
69 MERC
69 CHEV
69 FORD
CID
250
97
307
327
455
232
302
350
400
307
327
72
327
340
122
383
429
350
350
283
302
318
400
360
327
302
302
140
140
200
351
390
472
351
289
91
146
400
326
250
250
250
389
318
331
331
250
390
350
390
HC
4. 65
3. 52
3. 75
8. 93
6. 30
3. 25
2. 86
4. 13
2. 32
5. 47
6. 62
3. 09
10. 29
2. 55
3. 62
6 28
5. 87
4. 07
2. 93
3. 48
3. 97
4. 61
2. 99
7. 95
8. 72
4. 48
7. 60
2. 9%
2. 93
3. 34
2. 78
4. 12
0. 99
9. 00
3. 72
5. 38
5. 36
3. 32
4. 23
3. 23
1. 47
1. 19
4. 39
3. 74
4. 19
3 66
3. 21
7. 64
6. 36
3. 33
CO
60 60
37. 14
46 42
104. 04
1 16 36
85 22
39 03
60 37
47. 94
86. 34
107 36
27. O2
161. IS
58. 33
31. 50
108. 43
82. 50
72. 52
28 84
26 26
76. 61
109. O9
49 35
121. 51
69. 17
80. 14
81. 13
48. 26
50. 76
38. 23
70. 63
23. 77
38. 39
136. 42
41. 77
104. 27
47. 33
82. 92
37. 21
57. 52
23. 89
25. 08
83 94
79. 38
91. 09
90. 24
31. 83
126. 70
73. 27
125. 21
C02
421. 84
327. 43
621. 30
303. 76
642. 11
411. 52
734. 13
742. 27
872 96
346. 80
348. 28
283. 27
466. 55
363 84
337. 37
396. 98
632. 89
371. 89
668. 51
336. 88
683 68
551. 79
771. 96
628. 15
347. 01
653. 12
342. 25
384. 23
38O. 34
343. 06
332. 67
638. 60
1198. IS
611. 99
327. 07
268. 47
418. 42
764. 50
724. 63
441. 30
733. 32
333. 25
315. 34
457. 17
727 98
703. 63
342. 57
67O. 49
494. 96
363 12
NO
4. 73
3. 31
4. 18
3. 46
3. 63
2 40
3. 11
2. 90
3 84
3. 35
3 28
2. 49
1. 92
1. 44
3 04
2. 46
3 65
4. 32
3. 54
3. 89
2. 21
2 03
2. 95
2. 48
4. 74
2 93
6. 33
3. 06
2. 88
4. 98
2. 63
5. 26
3. 54
4. 31
1. 82
1. 59
2. 63
3. 36
2. 61
2. 33
3 13
2 49
2. 90
2. 35
2. 10
1. 91
2. 4O
3. 61
3. 27
3. 66
N02
2. 13
0. 67
1. 48
0. 97
1. 26
0. 54
0. 63
0 94
1. 35
0. 73
1. 26
0. 45
0. 4O
0. 19
0. 96
0. 73
1 10
1. 10
0. 94
1. 72
0 39
0. 33
0. 94
0. 65
2 33
1 OO
2. 72
0 66
0. 69
2. 67
0. 63
2. 25-
0. 88
1. 51
0. 48
0. 23
0. 63
0. 70
0. 30
0. 39
0. 61
0. 48
0. 74
0. 67
0. 32
0. 35
0. 60
1. 21
0. 89
1. 12
NOX
6. 86
3. 98
5. 66
4. 43
4., 89
2. 94
3. 74
3. 84
5. 19
4. O8
4. 34
2. 94
2 32
1. 63
4. 00
3. 21
4. 75
3. 42
4. 48
5. 61
2. 60
2. 36
3. 89
3. 13
7. 07
3. 95
9. 05
3. 72
3 37
7. 65
3. 28
7. 31
4. 42
5. 82
2. 3O
1. 82
3. 26
4. 06
3. 11
2 74
3. 74
2. 97
3. 64
3. 02
2. 42
2. 26
3. 00
4. 82
4. 16
4. 78
NOXC
t>. 37
3. 80
3. 30
4. 27
4. 50
2. 78
3. 67
3. 79
5. 07
3. 86
4. 53
2. 96
2. 26
1. 54
3 81
2. 38
4. 19
3. 26
4. 34
3. 72
2. 65
2. 33
3. 70
3. 00
7. 23
3. 88
9. 64
3. 34
3. 76
7. 62
3. 29
7. 32
4. 53
3. 93
2. 21
1. 67
3. 18
4. 00
3. 02
2. 63
3. 60
2. 79
3. 30
2. 79
2. 30
2. 23
2. 72
4. 93
3. 87
4. 64
ICO
7.0C
2.75
1.00
0.80
2.50
3. CO
1.75
1.50
0.10
5.00
5.50
3.20
6.2C
1 .?n
2.50
0.60
6.50
3.50
0.50
2.UO
5.5«
8. CO
0.8C
6.50
6.50
5.80
6.50
0.80
0.80
2.20
9.00
O.C2
0.25
10.00
1.60
6.80
2.50
0.20
4. CO
2.10
1.90
1 .90
2.25,
6.00
0.50
0.50
3.50
6.80
7.50
7.30
FUEL
ECON
16.7
22.4
12.6
12.7
10.5
16.0
11.0
10.4
9.3
12.7
12.0
26.3
11.8
13.4
21.2
11.3
11.1
12.7
12.3
15.1
10.9
12.0
10.3
10.5
13.0
11.2
12.8
18.9
18.9
14.5
19.6
12.5
7.0
10.4
14.7
19.7
17.4
9.7
10.7
16.4
11.4
19.4
13.4
14.9
10.0
10.6
14.0
9.9
14.0
11.4
-------
F.XHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN ORflftS PER MILE
LOS AMOELES
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
50
51
52
33
54
56
57
53
5?
6O
61
62
62R
63
64
65
67
63
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
73
79
80
81
82
83
84
86
87
flQ
69
95
91
93
94
93
96
97
98
99
100
101
YR MAKE
67 FORD
63 BUIC
67 MERC
63 PONT
71 CHEV
71 DODO
66 FORD
7O FORD
66 VOLK
69 FONT
70 FORD
71 CHEV
71 CHEV
70 CHEV
7O PONT
66 PLYtl
70 CHEV
70 OLDS
68 FORL'
69 PONT
69 OLDS
69 CHEV
71 TOYO
66 FONT
71 FORD
71 VOLK
69 PLYM
71 I3UIC
69 OLDS
72 FORD
70 AMER
72 EUIC
63 FORD
70 DODO
66 EIJIC
71 CHEV
IS OLDS
* 1 l '01 \:
70 PLYM
67 OLDS
f..n FORD
7\ PLYM
67 YOLK
6S MERC
69 BUIC
*9 VOLK
71 FOP-D
70 CHRY
69 CHE1,'
CID
289.
350
410
350
350
318
200
302
73
1 00
331
350
350
402
350
225
3O7
350
302
400
350
23O
113
3?'?
351
97
'-IS
455
455
421-3
304
350
390
225
340
330
433
433
383
425
390
225
302
430
97
98
440
327
HC
3 31
24. 63
8. 96
7 12
3. 96
4 t9
4. 62
3. 66
31 13
4. 76
1 09
3 24
3. 46
18. 93
3. 13
7. 23
6. 19
4. 57
4. 92
4. 85
3. 96
6 88
2. 50
4. 28
3. 72
6. 72
5. 04
3. 31
3. 37
3. 77
4. 28
1 94
5. 15
3. 41
4. 89
4.92
3. 67
9 32
6. 13
5. 15
3. 37
6.23
20" 13
'"?&• 2s
7.90
.,9. 95
?8'- 9B
CO
50. 73
37. 05
133 14
94. 11
69. 13
99. 38
131. 13
39. 03
173. 38
79 -T.3
56. 13
49. 79
41. 79
172. 37
81. 38
139 31
62 86
63. 83
36. 55
90. 74
62. 14
77. 50
37. 56
52. 93
46. 23
61. 17
37. 52
65 63
38. 67
104 15
74. 34
34. 35
82. 59
62. 39
105. 84
63 62
66 12
113 24
36. 47
83. 42
64. 31
22. 70
114. 61
114. 87
67. 90
63. 47
88. 63
30. 49
132,82
166. 27
C02
401. 71
398. 98
646. 95
586. 54
731. 79
533 90
412 97
339. 31
174. 55
68O. S3
689. 27
679 00
703 57
59/9. 04
62V. 13
399. 63
47Q. 26
600. 30
536. 46
616. 03
680.- 67
383. 32
358. 38
617. 05
620. 47
404. 11
523.35
305. 60
6-24. 91
722 23
390. 82
632. 43
327. 91
330. 18
47&. 63
6O5. 66
5S8. 24
57^ 40
2TO r.4
570. 63
604. 39
327. 31
535. 70
200. 00
:S39. 45
774. 94
: 318. 39
311. 92
607. 58
i'399. 37 ;:
NO
2 50
4. 04
2- 74
3. 99
3. 30
2. 45
1 22
3. 54
0. 47
3. 42
4. 81
3. 14
3. 20
1. 20
3. 64
2 42
4. 50
3. 31
6 38
3. 92
3. 27
3. 22
3. 38
5. 77
3 20
3. 11
4. 93
4. 20
4. 04
2 44
2. S6
3. 24
3. 63
4. 89
0. 77
4 70
4. 76.
4. 48
2. 44
4 06.
3 92
3 53
1.53
1. 49
2. 27
3. 85
2 07
2. 59
4. 05
2.92.
N02
0. 61
I. 45
0. 76
2 30
0 84
0. 7O
0 16
1. 42
0. 05
0. 82
I. 96
1. 01
0. 98
O. 14
1. 02
0 87
2. 24
0. 71
3. 62
0. 76
0. 66
0. 88
1. 18
2. 37
0. 87
0 78
1. 67
1 46
1. 20
0.-33
0. 44
X 41
d.: 83
2. 25
0. 15
1. 74
2. 16
2. 0.1
0. 81
0. 97
1. 08
0. 77
0. 28
• 0. 59
0. 84
0. 29
0.63
1. 41
0. 73
NOX
3J 1 1
5. 49
3. 50
6. 29
4. 14
3. 15
1 38
4. 96
o. 5;
4. 24
6 "'-'
4. Itf.
4. IS
1. 34
4. 66
3. 2T
6. 74
4 02
10. 00
4. 68
3. 93
4. 10
4. 76
3. 14
4. 07
3 89
6. 6O
5. 66
5. 24
2 97
3. 30
4. 63
4. 46
7. 14
0. 92
6. 44
6. 92
6. 49
3 25
5 03
5 00
4. 30
1. SI
1. 5?
2. 36
4. 6?
2. 36
3. 22
5. 46
3. 70
NOXC ,
3. O2
5. 74
3. 34
6. 00
4. 02
3. 26
1 29
4. 33
0. 32
4. 05
6. 46
4. 14
4. 08
1. 33
4. 33
3. 16
6. 07
3. 90 .
9 00
4. 64 "{
3. 86 :
3 85
4. 82
7. 93
3. 78
3. 92
6. 29
5. 18
4. 83
2. 77
3. 14
4. 17
3. 79
6. 50
0. 80
5. 62
6. 60
6. 07
2, 99
5. 02
4. 87
4. 19
1. 84
1. 52
2. 43
4. 36
2. 27-
2. 85':
5. 10
3, 48.
ICO
0.60
0.10
4.00
6.80
1.25
^7.80
10.00
7.00
<4 .00
4.20
0.15
0.10
0.10
5.00
1.80
10 .00
6.00
5.50
2.00
5.50
4.30
0.00
1.60
4. 40
1.10
2.00
0.05
3.00
2. SO
5.00
2.00
2.50
5.20
2.50
3.00
3.40
5.20
5.20
3.20
6.80
6.UO
On A
.ID
0,60
2.40
o.e6
2.60
4.80
0.20
4.80
10. cd
FUEL
ECON
18.0
11.4
10.0
11.7
10.4
12.6
14.0
12.7
14.4
10.8
11.2
11.6
11.3
9.5
11.5
13.9
15.1
11.1
13.8
11.4
11.2
16.8
20.9
12.4
12.6
17.0
14.8
9.7
12.2
9.9
12.3
12.8
13.2
18.1
13.6
12.3
13.0
11.4
22.7
12.3
12.3
15.3
16.6
10 O
19.9
12.5
10.1
18.7
23.1
10.5
11.8
-------
3-16
TABLE 13A
F.XHAII3T EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN OPAHS PER MILE
LOS ANGELES
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
102
103
104
105
106
107
1O8
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
117
113
119
120
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
149R
130
130R
151
YR MAKE
68 CHRY
69 FORD
68 CHEV
71 LINC
68 FORD
67 PLYM
72 CHEV
72 FORD
70 FORD
70 PLYM
72 CHRY
67 CHEV
66 DODij
66 MERC
67 CHRY
68 CADI
66 OLDS
70 VOLK
72 CHEV
63 CHEV
72 CHEV
67 FORD
66 CADI
67 PONT
70 TOYO
67 CHEV
72 CHEV
67 FORD
69 PLYM
72 CHEV
67 CHEV
67 AMER
71 DODO
69 CHEV
68 CHEV
71 OPEL
72 OLDS
71 OLDS
71 BUIC
72 TOYO
69 PLYM
71 CHEV
72 CHEV
71 CHEV
67 CHEV
69 CHEV
69 CHEV
68 RAMB
68 RAMB
70 PONT
CID
383
302
307
460
289
313
40O
351
302
313
400
250
383
390
383
472
330
97
350
307
350
390
429
40O
116
327
330
289
318
140
327
232
383
307
250
116
435
435
455
120
318
350
350
350
283
327
327
290
290
330
HC
8. 82
4. 07
8. 45
4. IS
13. 08
8. 88
1. 97
4. 40
11. 35
4. 89
3. 93
2. 46
4. 74
3. 51
13. 55
3. 60
8. 97
3. 07
2 02
5. 19
31 00
5. 62
2. 72
4. 23
4. 02
3. 10
1. 30
4. 66
5. SO
2. 70
9 73
2 97
3. 37
6. 35
2. 63
7. 11
1. 73
2. 78
5. 84
3. 72
4. 73
9. 86
4. 79
3. 41
6. 73
11. 31
3. 99
4. 73
4. 02
37. 08
CO
131. 25
82. 32
141. 36
68 86
39. 90
135 89
26 73
84. 94
158. 66
78. 47
83. 80
70. 20
93 62
72. 26
203. 72
75. 47
126. 89
35. 35
35. 43
67 70
55 35
67. 34
52. 99
69. 15
96. 04
47 39
19 00
1O9. 60
102. 31
61. 40
155. 08
22. 79
100. 74
130. 47
57. 12
71. 92
33. 17
62. 63
162. 23
46. 94
91. 73
69. 01
65. 44
37. 17
80. 10
102. 93
76,23
59. 43
60. 61
100. 04
C02
S4S. 81
449. 21
462. 58
776. 33
487. 79
443 96
847. 24
693 74
525. 66
537. 25
683. 07
388. 34
393. 82
749. 24
382. 33
770. 58
464. 34
303. 49
673. 07
336. 94
663. 42
343. 89
696. 58
630. 03
377. 48
639. 33
767. 48
309. 14
349. 40
419. 98
333. 62
433 01
609. 06
462. 19
336. 24
338. 67
928. 19
832. 22
738. 20
347. 10
569. 91
634. 23
698. 22
616. 94
338. 40
393. 66
669. 81
333. 09
332. 66
637. 36
NO
4. 09
3 21
3 39
4. 17
4 60
1. OO
3. 02
3 36
2. 04
5. 38
4. 31
2. 87
3. 80
2. 57
1. 91
5. 09
2. 23
2. 83
2. 55
3. 01
2. 41
4. 41
4. 98
3. 64
2. 48
3. 97
2 10
1 89
4. 42
2. 11
3. 32
4. 83
3. 06
2. 33
2. 12
4. 42
4. 57
4. 06
1 78
3. 43
3. 39
2 64
2. 31
2. 97
3. 34
4. 02
3. 12
3. 82
3. 78
4. 38
N02
1 42
0. 63
0. 79
1. 67
1 83
0. 09
0 51
0. 71
0. 14
1. 85
1. 13
0 94
0. 81
0. 40
0. 32
1. 73
0. 27
0. 47
0. 44
0. 38
0. 42
1. 03
2. 61
2. 1O
0. 94
0. 93
0. 34
0. 26
0. 94
0. 33
0. 73
1. 93
0. 67
0. 43
0. 31
1. 06
1. 53
1. 13
0. 29
0. 88
0. 81
0. 36
O. 67
0. S3
0. 36
1. 16
0. 47
0. 83
0. 38
1. 41
NOX
5. 31
3. 84
4. 18
3. 84
6. 43
1. 09
3. 53
4. 07
2 18
7. 23
5 44
3. 81
4 61
2. 97
2. 23
6. 82
2. SO
3. 30
2. 99
3. 59
2. 83
5. 44
7. 39
7. 74
3 42
4. 92
2. 44
2. 15
5. &
2. 44
4. 23
6. 76
3. 73
2. 98
2. 63
3. 48
6. 12
5. 19
2. 07
4. 31
4. 2O
3. 00
2. 98
3. 32
3. 9O
5. 18
3. 59
4. 63
4. 36
5. 79
NOXC
3. 15
3. 62
3. 99
3. 86
6. O2
1. 0-1
3. 37
3. 83
2. 03
6. 53
3. 43
3. 38
4. 43
2. 69
2 13
7. 07
2 34
3. 15
2 81
3. 10
2. 61
5. 01
6. 43
7. 24
3. 11
4. 39
2. 27
1. 89
4. 62
2. 49
3. 98
6. 36
3. 50
2. 79
2 46
S. 19
6. 01
4. 92
1. 98
4. 20
3. 84
2. 92
2. 91
3. 41
3. 84
4. 93
3. 54
4. 30
4. 19
3. 73
ICO
8.20
2.60
5.20
1.T5
6.00
«.oo
0.10
3.60
5.CC
2.90
5.50
3.UO
1.CO
1 .70
n.co
C.10
9.50
0.20
C.T5
2.80
10.00
U.25
2. en
6.50
0.40
0.20
n.io
2.10
5. 00
2.50
7.50
0.90,
2.70
6.00
7. CO
10.00
0.30
2.60
3.UO
i».10
3.70
0.80
6.00
0.80
3.30
3.60
3.60
0.90
0.90
2.80
FUEL
ECON
11.4
15.0
12.5
9.9
15.0
11.6
9.9
10.6
10.9
12.8
10.6
12.6
11.7
10.2
9.4
9.9
12.8
23.9
12.1
13.5
10.4
13.3
11.3
11.8
16.4
11.9
11.1
12.7
12.2
16.7
10.7
17.8
11.4
12.9
14.0
18.7
9.0
9.2
8.8
20.5
12.2
11.5
10.9
12.9
12.6
11.2
11.0
13.8
13.8
9.5
-------
3-17
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN ORAMS PER MILE
LOS ANGELES
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR YR
151R 70
152 71
153 72
154 71
155 71
156 72
157 66
157R 66
158 72
159 71
160 72
161 67
162 72
163 72
164 72
165 72
167 72
168 72
169 72
169R 72
170 72
170R 72
172 72
173 69
174 70
175 69
176 70
177 66
178 72
179 72
MAKE
PONT
OLDS
MERC
CHEV
PONT
AMER
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
DODO
DODO
PONT
CADI
VOLK
PLYfl
VOLK
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
DODO
OLDS
FORD
DODG
FORD
CHEV
FORD
CID
350
350
40O
400
350
258
283
283
350
351
225
225
350
472
97
360
102
455
455
455
340
340
400
440
350
250
440
390
402
302
HC
36. 17
2. 11
2. 96
2. 98
5. 02
1. 84
5. 67
4. 65
2. 56
4. 11
2. 35
4 01
3. 10
1. 14
2. 63
3 32
2. 34
4. 18
3. 10
2. 65
5 38
4. 41
4 18
5. 57
5 91
2. 95
16 30
5. 87
2. 73
4. 02
CO
99. 59
59. 38
61. 22
SO. 23
105 27
27. 77
93. 19
75. 91
52. 23
58. 43
71. 83
63. 42
46. 01
34. 92
44. 23
59. 57
34. 98
71. 01
26. 84
20. 93
85 62
82 88
45. 47
65. 82
104. 83
45. 52
202 92
126. 34
53 20
60. 59
C02
647. 11
798. 23
881. 83
777. 64
674. 66
528. 61
626. 45
594. 30
721. 41
573. 09
563. 72
431. 45
721. 95
1031. 50
364. 89
821 29
424. 03
929. 42
891. 38
864. 31
333. 71
539. 37
813. 88
697. 19
609. 64
479. 86
378. 62
837. 64
832 76
761. 07
NO
4. 24
3. 76
3 38
3. 89
2. 93
3. SO
3. 03
3. 39
2. 43
3. 60
2 82
4 6O
3. 32
3. 81
2. 29
3. 11
2. 39
3. 05
3. €4
3. 78
3. 90
3. 28
3 68
2. 34
3. 73
3. 29
2. 46
3. 18
2. 71
3. 12
N02
1. 24
1. 03
2. 27
0. 86
0. 36
1. 02
0. 76
0. 93
0. 48
0. 94
0. 30
1. 38
0. 76
0. 95
0. 29
1. 01
0. 58
0. 73
1. 20
1. 12
1. 21
0. 98
1. 89
0. 39
1. 19
2. OO
0. 60
0. 66
0. 62
0. 60
NOX
3. 48
4. 79
7. 85
4. 73
3. 29
4. 82
3. 79
4. 34
2. 93
4. 54
3. 32
6. 18
4. 08
4. 76
2 58
4. 12
3. 17
3. 78
3. 04
4. 90
5. 11
4. 26
3. 57
2. 73
4. 94
7. 29
3. 06
3. 84
3. 33
3. 72
NOXC
5. 33
4. 60
7. 54
4. 60
3. 18
4. 70
3. 60
4. 22
2. 83
4. 43
3. 23
3. 97
4. OO
4. 67
2. 34
4. 02
3. 03
3. 33
4. 72
4. 78
4. 88
4. 16
3. 31
2. 61
4. 79
7. 12
3. 03
3. 91
3. 70
3. 84
ICO
2.80
0.20
C.10
0.15
3.00
C.70
10.00
10. CO
U.20
2.70
5.20
1.20
0.60
1.25
0.65
0.20
C.UO
2.50
0.20
0.20
5.50
5.50
0.65
0.25
6.00
1.60
8.90
S.OO
0.50
0.20
FUEL
ECON
9.6
9.9
9.0
10.2
10.4
15.4
11.2
12.1
10.9
13.1
13.0
15.7
11.0
a.o
20.0
9.6
18.2
8.4
9.4
9.8
12.6
12.6
9.9
10.8
11.2
15.8
9.3
8.4
9.6
10.2
-------
3-18
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
34
36
37
38
39
40
41
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
32
53
54
55
55R
56
YR MAKE
67 VOLK
72 CHEV
6fc CADI
72 BUIC
71 PONT
72 DODG
72 CHRY
72 PLYM
67 CHEV
66 FORD
67 CHEV
67 DODO
69 BUIC
66 VOLK
7O DODG
69 CHEV
72 MERC
66 CHEV
70 MERC
69 FORD
68 RAMB
69 CADI
72 BUIC
68 VOLK
72 CADI
71 LINC
72 TOYO
66 CHEV
72 DATS
67 FORD
66 PONT
67 CHRY
72 VOLK
67 OLDS
68 BUIC
66 CHEV
66 FORD
67 PONT
68 PONT
66 DODG
67 PLYM
67 FORD
68 PLYM
68 OLDS
67 CHEV
66 FORD
68 CHEV
66 MERC
66 MERC
71 FORD
CID
91
350
429
455
455
225
400
318
283
239
327
225
430
78
318
396
351
283
351
429
29O
472
350
91
472
460
12O
233
97
390
389
383
97
330
350
283
390
4OO
400
383
273
289
318
350
327
2OO
327
289
289
331
HC
5. 85
3. 41
11. 25
1 99
4. 15
2. 66
3. 59
2. 83
12 62
5. 41
7. 11
5. 01
4. 59
6. 12
8. 22
7. 40
3. 35
7. 80
4 36
3. 31
2. 32
3. 18
4. 60
27. 02
2. 75
4. 13
3. 21
16. 36
2. 98
6. O6
9. 96
10. OS
3. 26
8. 31
6. 49
8. 16
7. 36
11. 62
6. 49
9. 26
9. 73
5. 63
3. 38
5. 33
9. 86
6. 98
10. 67
4. 93
4. 68
4. 26
CO
49 41
40. 97
232. 02
18. 11
22. 04
36. 17
50. 81
14. 00
201. 03
63. 00
66. 21
97. 92
76. 03
72. 83
38. 42
143. 44
26. 72
38. 36
27. 38
31 14
18. 21
58. 00
49. 14
113. 86
36. 83
54. 37
32. 86
161. 43
42. 13
61. 16
152. 13
219. 77
31. 37
129. 95
133. 71
73. 72
98. 60
160. 23
122. 43
49. 37
79. 69
122. 45
27. 73
68. 81
163. 34
85. 77
135. 33
20. 10
17. 82
32. 16
C02
296. 99
684. 18
333. 59
786. 79
676. 92
453. O6
623. 41
539. 70
388. 32
452. 38
439. 32
321. 21
484. 37
227. 16
628. 22
559. 73
773. 41
398. 19
383. 73
392. 96
314. 23
816. 27
709. 69
293 29
929. 02
730. 88
391. O7
436. 50
316. 03
392. 57
427. 34
439. 97
313. 86
721. O9
307. 21
478. 81
369. 46
376. 77
372. 34
706. 98
474. 02
428. 40
521. 93
367. 33
479. 46
390. 27
339. 66
499. 43
488. 84
602. 24
NO
1. 36
2. 94
1. 02
3. 49
5. 44
4. 22
4 79
3. 97
1 37
5. 29
2 84
2. 15
2. 64
0. 99
4. 87
2. 29
4. 88
2. 66
3 22
2. 94
2 46
5. 21
4 70
1. 93
5. 13
6. 56
3. 64
2. 03
2. 82
5. 88
0. 34
1. 33
2. 34
3. 27
3. 03
4. 28
2. 83
2 39
4. 73
3. 39
4. 97
2. 21
4. 36
4. 93
3. 80
3. 28
3. 74
4. 12
4. 16
3. 53
N02
0. 10
0. 48
0. 09
1. 70
1. 38
0. 98
1. 20
0. 69
0. 23
1. 61
0. 50
0. 21
0. 87
0. 09
1. 07
0. 20
1. 01
0. 44
0. 30
0 47
0. 41
1. 40
1. 43
0. 28
1. 38
1. 82
1. 19
0. 37
O. 66
1. 91
0. 03
O. 13
O. 48
1. 02
0. 32
1. 10
0. 62
0. 23
1. 33
0. 92
1. 77
0. 33
1. 73
1. 78
1. 03
O. 93
1. 10
1,46
1. 43
0. 89
NOX
1. 66
3. 42
1. 11
7. 19
7. 02.
5. 20
5. 99
4 66
i. 80
6. 90
3. 34
2 36
3. 51
1 08
5. 94
2.49
3. 89
3. 10
3. 72
3. 41
2. 87
6. 61
6. 13
2. 23
6. 71
8. 38
4. 83
2. 42
3. 48
7. 79
0. 37
1. 48
3. 02
4. 29
3.33
3. 38
3. 43
2. 64
6. 10
4. 31
6. 74
2. 54
6 31
6. 71
4. 83
4. 21
4. 84
3. 38
5:39
4. 42
NOXC
1. 54
3. 09
1. 04
7. 71
3. 98
4. 79
5. 44
4. 52
1. 69
6. O6
3. 05
2. 11
3. 19
1. Ol
3. 10
2. 14
3. 33
2. 67
3. 36
2. 83
2. 28
3. 38
3. 20
2. 02
3. 68
7. 37
4. 24
2. 10
2. 87
6. 77
0. 31
1. 28
2. 47
4. 00
3. 03
4. 79
3. 13
2. 38
3. 29
3. 74
3. 96
2. 29
3. S3
3. 61
4. 30
3. 73
4. 26
3. 23
4. 31
3. 76
ICO
1.20
0.10
1 .CO
1.20
0,10
0.50
0.50
o.in
7.50
1 .8S
0.30
7.10
2.20
5.20
0.50
"4.90
1.10
2.10
1.65
u.oo
3.60
0.10
0.50
2.20
O.C5
O.C5
3.20
1.50
O.C
2.80
1.00
tt.60
2.10
4.00
5.40
1.50
3.80
3.80
8.20
5.80
8.80
7. *0
0.25
2.80
9.20
0.10
2.50
0.05
0.45
5.20
FUEL
ECON
22.6
11.7
9.3
10.8
12.2
17.1
12.4
15.0
11.9
15.6
15.7
18.1
14.4
24.6
12.4
10.9
10.7
12.4
13.8
19.6
25.3
9.7
11.1
15.9
8.9
10.7
19.6
11.9
22.7
12.5
12.7
10.9
23.6
9.3
n.«
14.3
16.2
10.3
11.3
10.9
14.1
13.9
15.4
12.5
11.6
16.2
11.0
16.2
16.6
12.7
-------
3-19
TABLE ISA
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
57
38
39
60
61
62
63
64
63
66
67
68
69
70
72
73
74
73
76
78
79
79R
80
31
82
33
84
85
85R
36
87
33
89
90
*l
92
93
94
9t>
95R
96
•?;
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
YR MAKE
72 PUIC
68 FORD
68 MERC
66 CHEV
69 CHEV
68 FORD
71 FORD
69 PONT
69 DODO
69 PLYM
69 OLDS
68 CHEV
69 CHEV
70 PLYM
69 FORD
70 FORD
68 CHRY
70 PLYM
72 CHEV
69 PLYM
67 CHEV
67 CHEV
71 OLDS
63 DODG
70 CHEV
70 VOLK
69 VOLK
68 CHEV
68 CHEV
66 RAMB
69 MERC
68 CHEV
68 CHEV
72 rHEV
ia FO&B
69 FORD
69 OLDS
70 AMER
69 BUtC
69 BUIC
70 VOLK
;i FORD
67 RAMB
69 CHEV
70 CHEV
69 CHEV
69 PONT
72 AMER
66 OLDS
70 PONT
CID
455
302
302
194
307
302
122
400
383
318
455
230
230
318
302
250
383
318
140
318
327
327
453
318
350
97
91
307
307
232
428
327
307
40O
3190
302
330
232
330
35O
97
200
232
307
350
327
350
232
330
400
HC
2 49
6. 43
4. 22
7. 44
6. 12
3. 54
3 84
21. 02
7 52
4. 05
6 36
16. 08
5. 46
3. 95
6. 16
4. 84
6 19
13. 84
1. 23
6. 23
10. 84
7. 58
2. 72
4. 93
4. 26
2. 18
4. 01
9. 83
10. 12
6. 14
7. 51
6. 25
7. 24
3. 28
4, fc3
3. 93
3 04
2 31
2 9Q
3. 63
2 67
2. 43
8. 79
7. 32
3. 06
22. 03
5. 23
2. 19
8. 88
9. 32
CO
27. 29
43. 65
16. 92
118. 34
41. 37
24. 59
51. 20
172. 24
116. 42
33. 65
128 01
126 32
65. 47
40. 73
82. 18
38. 89
112. 75
124 79
26. 24
85. 46
143. 23
114. 99
18. 53
40. 19
116. 83
20 34
36 22
139. 90
138. 24
93 82
143. 20
53. 32
87. 50
64 68
36 14
43. 84
77. 84
20. 16
47 39
60. 32
37 38
26 68
113. 60
114. 08
49. 88
233. 42
48. 34
13. 49
116. 34
18. 60
C02
909. 09
627. 07
313. 40
363. 92
498. 31
360. 34
339. 32
472. 48
439. 14
540. 41
720. 85
490. 31
430 35
680. 23
543 28
434. 33
539 83
508. 43
383. 62
313. 83
386. 02
393. 31
721 43
481. 29
702. 22
333 43
293 77
458. 33
476. 76
368. 12
362. 79
418. 23
316. 62
907 26
601 46
576 66
612 32
316. 33
580. 63
551. 41
299. 01
404. 33
413. 08
323. 70
379. 96
340. 73
613. 63
484. 99
611. 65
830.20
NO
4. 81
4 93
4. 53
3. 33
4. 98
2 86
2 80
3 26
1. 99
5. 23
6. 01
4. 78
3. 17
6. 91
3. 01
3. 14
3. 58
4. 11
2. 44
3. 03
1. 54
1. 77
5. 08
4. 30
2. 49
2. 32
1 64
2. 04
2. 12
2. 86
1. 84
3. 20
2 37
3. 16
3 04
4 9O
2. 88
2. 94
4. 93
4. 45
3. 49
3. 23
1. 93
4. 28
4. 03
1. 06
3. 12
3. 39
2. 73
3. 71
NO2
2. 02
I. 79
1. 28
0. 79
1. 61
0. 60
0. 63
1. 04
0. 30
1. 68
2. 29
1. 83
0. 60
4. 33
0. 72
0. 70
0. 73
1. 20
O. 36
0. 34
0. 23
0. 19
2. 26
1. 37
0. 38
O. 34
0. 22
0. 18
0. 32
0. 59
0. 20
0. 63
0. 48
0: 62
0.56
1. 26
0. 32
0. 64
1. 67
1. 32
0. 84
0. 86
0. 28
1. 11
1. 15
0. 19
1. 67
2.37
0. 63
0. 85
NOX
6. 83
6. 74
3. 81
4. 12
6. 39
3 46
3. 43
4. 30
2. 29
6. 91
8. 30
6. 61
3. 77
11. 26
3. 73
3. 84
4. 33
5. 31
2. 80
3. 37
1. 77
1. 96
7. 34
3. 67
2. 87
2. 86
1. 86
2. 22
2. 44
3. 45
2. 04
3. 83
3. 05
3. 78
3. 60
6. 16
3. 40
3,58
6. 60
3. 77
4. 33
4. 11
2. 23
5. 39
5. 18
1.23
6. 79
7. 76
3.36
4. 56
NOXC
6. O9
3. 95
4. 98
3. 72
3. 77
3. 08
3. 24
3. 36
2. 02
6. O9
7. 89
3. 83
3. 78
9. 43
3. 59
3. 39
4. 57
4. 80
2. 31
3. SO
1. 70
1. 91
7. OO
5. 44
2. 78
2. 79
1. 78
2. 17
2. 39
3. 24
1. 94
3. 81
2. 88
3. 88
3. 64
6 28
3. 47
3. 69
6. 21
3. 34
4. 01
3. 83
2. 03
4. 96
4. 77
1. 20
5. 93
7. 88
3. 26
4. 43
ICO
1.50
0.6C
1.25
9.20
5.60
0.70
0.65
3.00
5.20
3.20
8.60
10.00
1.00
5.10
8.00
U.flO
2.10
1.40
0.8C
0.50
5.40
5.40
0.80
6. CO
9.60
1 .00
1.75
5.60
5.60
8.00
4.20
4.60
3.60
0.20
1.20
1.25
2.20
2.20
2.20
•2. 1C
1 .00
0.15
1.60
6. CO
4.60
10.00
1.95
C.25
it .60
0.25
FUEL
ECON
9.2
12.4
16.0
15.5
15.2
14.5
20.5
11.0
13.3
14.6
9.4
12.2
15.6
11.7
12.8
17.4
11.7
11.9
20.7
13.3
13.7
14.8
11.7
15.8
9.9
23.8
24.3
12.5
12.2
16.6
10.9
17.0
13.1
8.7
13.2
13.4
11.8
25.0
13.3
13.4
24.2
19.5
14.3
12.2
13.2
11.4
12.5
17.3
10.8
10.0
-------
3-20
TABLE 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR YR
107 72
108 70
109 70
110 71
110R 71
111 69
112 68
113 72
114 72
115 70
116 70
117 70
118 72
119 70
120 70
121 70
122 71
124 71
125 72
126 72
127 72
123 71
129 71
130 68
131 71
131R 71
132 72
133 71
134 71
135 71
137 72
138 72
140 72
141 67
142 69
144 71
14S 70
145R 7O
146 71
147 71
118 72
148R 72
149 71
151 72
152 71
153 71
154 70
155 71
157 72
158 66
MAKE
FORD
OLDS
BUIC
TOYO
TOYO
FORD
FORD
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
FORD
FORD
PLYM
FORD
VOLK
FORD
PONT
BUIC
CHEV
CADI
DODG
DODO
FORD
CHEV
DODG
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
DODG
CHEV
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
OPEL
FORD
FORD
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
VOLK
CHEV
BUIC
CID
122
350
350
71
71
240
200
350
302
230
440
350
350
455
200
331
360
302
97
429
400
330
307
472
223
223
351
307
383
318
225
340
318
230
302
400
351
331
66
331
400
400
97
330
400
307
383
97
307
340
HC
3. 47
4. 24
13. 17
2. 93
2. 85
5. 78
3. 67
5. 50
4. 80
2. 50
20. 86
5. 00
5. 27
2. 87
2. 96
4. 96
4. 76
3. 94
2. 37
4. 10
4 88
3. 21
4. 26
3. 10
3. 42
3. 39
3. 64
3. 92
15. 15
3. 10
3. 26
5. 37
3. 61
16. 17
3. 93
4. 31
3. 01
6. 36
3. O7
6. 79
4. 51
3. 11
4. 93
4. 72
3. 63
6. 28
35. 47
4. 84
3. 63
7. 74
CO
36. 34
41 12
180 49
23 48
26. 19
112. 47
98. 76
88. 87
101 72
28. 04
72. 22
78. 63
32. 52
46 23
12. 02
104. 20
87. 82
36. 24
13. 81
31 34
88. 61
71. IS
59. 70
58. 81
63. 37
39. 32
27. 07
31. 61
234. 08
26. 01
41. 47
81. 13
31. 94
142. 74
22. 63
93. 53
71. 49
93. 23
43. 28
88. 26
4O 33
72. 99
36. 34
31. 89
4O. 34
30. 43
66. 78
61. 29
19. 30
194. 76
CO2
395. 03
634. 49
484. 06
281. 37
279. 52
388. 50
386. 73
658 30
398. 46
450. 12
3t>5. 08
553 95
730. 56
691 28
357. 74
69O 82
584 43
632 34
384 40
684. 44
648 31
819 89
673. 12
904. 40
417 73
405. 77
710. 24
603. 00
538. 59
595. 38
431. 43
302. 68
488. 40
374. 65
527. 07
648. 43
627 31
601. 31
323 91
620. 14
734. 13
730. 36
302. 93
638. 28
683. 60
525. 97
368. 82
324. 19
603. S3
430. 26
NO
3. 36
3. 81
2. 33
2. 62
2. 61
1. 51
3. 48
4. 17
1. 72
2. 03
2. 39
3. 19
3. 45
3. 41
3. 53
3. 25
4. 10
2. 83
5 25
4. 96
3. 00
3 74
3. 81
3. 28
3.01
4. 73
3. 39
4. 16
1. 37
3. 32
3 79
3. 49
4. 08
1 62
8. 67
4. 46
3. 33
3. 75
3. 98
3. 58
4. 86
4. 74
1. 94
2. 25
4. 19
3. 26
3. 39
2. 26
3. 38
1. 30
NO2
0. 82
0. 79
O. 42
0. 47
0. 60
0 19
1. 15
1. 31
0. 25
0 35
0. 79
0. 87
0. 73
0. 88
0. 69
0. 61
1. 02
0. 30
1. 89
1. 23
0. 53
0. 89
0. 81
0. 68
1 59
1. 36
2. OO
1 31
0. 25
0. 75
1. 07
1. 03
0. 64
0. 38
0. 24
2. 11
1. 06
1. 01
0. 87
2. 23
1. 14
1. 20
0. 3O
0. 31
1. 12
1 31
3. 13
0. 33
1. 11
0. 33
NOX
4 18
4. 60
2 93
3. 09
3. 21
1. 70
4. 63
3. 48
1. 97
2. 38
3. 18
4. 06
4. 18
4. 29
4. 22
3. 86
5. 12
3. 33
7. 14
6. 19
3. 53
4. 63
4. 62
3. 96
6. 60
6. 09
7. 39
3. 47
1. 82
4. 27
4. 86
4. 52
4. 72
2. 00
8. 91
6. 57
4. 39
4. 76
4. 83
7. 81
6. 00
3. 94
2. 24
2. 56
5. 31
6. 77
8. 72
2. 59
4. 69
1. 83
MOXC
3. 82
4. 39
2. 60
2. 92
2. 97
1. 39
4. 37
5. 95
1. 79
2. 22
2. 99
4. 10
3. 98
4. 36
4. 35
3 99
3. 24
3. 35
7 19
6 05
4. 16
4. 33
5 45
3. 78
6. 17
3. 74
7 11
5. 38
1. 82
3 82
4. 64
4. 20
4. 47
2. O7
9 66
6. 32
3. 89
4. 32
4. 19
7. 09
5. 46
3. 58
2. 19
2. 37
5. 03
6 24
8. 82
2. 64
4 27
1. 63
ICO
1.60
2.60
6.20
1.90
1.90
2. CO
10. OC
6. CO
1.15
5.90
0.00
6.80
0.05
0.60
0.50
0.30
5.00
C.20
0.10
1.98
8.00
1.25
H.55
0.50
8. CO
e.cc
1.50
7.20
7.70
2.20
3.50
3.10
3. tO
9. 1C
1.75
10. CO
it. 80
U. 80
7.35
C.60
2.20
2.20
3.20
6.75
0.20
8.30
8.00
2.20
1.75
5.50
FUEL
ECON
19.2
12.5
11.0
26.8
26.9
15.2
15.9
10.9
11.5
17.7
16.3
12.8
11.1
11.5
23.0
10.2
12.0
12.3
21.5
11.4
11.1
9.4
11.3
8.8
16.8
17.4
11.6
13.3
9.1
13.7
17.5
13.7
16.1
13.6
15.4
11.0
11.7
11.5
21.9
11.4
10.9
10.0
21.8
11.8
11.7
14.9
11.3
20.4
13.9
11.4
-------
3-21
TABLE 13A
tXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN 0;;rtMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1972 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
139
160
162
164
165
163R
166
166R
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
173
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
YR MAKE
72 PONT
68 FORD
72 OLDS
71 BUIC
72 CHEV
72 CHEV
70 FORD
70 FORD
70 CHEV
71 MERC
7O TOYO
71 CHEV
71 CHEV
72 FORD
71 DATS
67 FORD
66 PONT
70 FORD
70 PONT
70 BUIC
72 FORD
68 PONT
67 PONT
67 MERC
66 PLYM
72 CHEV
71 OLDS
71 PONT
67 BUIC
71 CHEV
CID
330
390
350
330
330
330
230
230
330
400
113
140
307
331
97
289
326
302
330
433
331
3SO
326
390
225
454
350
350
340
402
HC
4. 41
4. 81
3. 69
3. 48
2. 72
2. 33
4. 20
4. 09
4. 28
8. 91
9. 35
2. O5
8. 40
2. 30
7. 44
3. 38
8. 61
3. 71
7. 13
5. 61
3. 26
4. 21
6. 18
7. 30
7. 36
2. 89
4. OS
4. 32
7. 33
2. 64
CO
9O. 11
63. 32
44. 05
103. 10
13. 04
13. 38
39. 96
37. 98
73. 65
138. 60
88. 46
44. 87
38. 63
33. O6
107. 06
101. 72
40. 23
31. 71
31. 39
101. 18
37. 09
39. 41
69. 91
33. 38
134. 09
40. 72
61. 44
86. 72
129. 93
10. 11
CO2
724. 13
604. 13
7O6. 48
694. 19
636. 49
620. 83
412. 23
422. 92
682. 83
537. 33
336. 60
372. 80
349. 30
783. 80
264. 30
49O. 34
319. 33
664. 36
638. 26
733. 31
669. 96
660. 31
330. 74
689. 98
434. 43
78O. 06
373. 30
717. 93
483. 59
774. 92
NO
3. 79
3. 77
4. 23
3. 37
3. 03
2. 87
5. 36
5. 13
2. 80
3. 31
2. 63
3. 94
2. 33
4. 46
1. 77
2. 23
3. 33
3. 30
3. 86
3. 13
4. 33
3. 83
4 16
2. 81
1. 09
4. 31
4. 07
3.21
1.31
4. 31
NO2
0. 88
2. 86
1. 33
1. Ol
0. 63
0. 88
2. 13
2. 30
0. 68
0. 87
O. 42
1. O4
0. 67
1 30
0. 23
0. 33
0. 67
0. 83
1 24
1. 38
1. O7
0. 89
1. 42
0. 63
0. 09
1. 38
O. 9O
0. 79
0. 26
1. 37
NOX
4. 67
8. 63
3. 60
4. 58
3. 66
3. 75
7. 69
7. 43
3. 48
4. 38
3. 07
4. 98
3. 20
3. 96
2. 02
2. 36
4. 02
4. 13
3. 10
6. 31
3. 40
4. 68
3. 38
3. 44
1. 18
5. 89
4. 97
4. 00
1. 77
3.88
NOXC
4. 38
7. 92
3. 67
4. 49
3. 47
3. 43
6. 92
6. S3
3. 16
3. 93
2. 87
4. 70
3. 34
6. 8O
1. 76
3. 08
3. 33
4. 03
9. O2
6. 43
9. 42
4. 83
3. 53
3. 40
1. 28
3. 73
4. 70
3. 94
1. 64
5. 84
ICO
9.00
3.10
2.50
0.20
0.20
0.20
5.80
5.80
2.75
10. CO
a. 25
0.20
2.60
0.20
6.40
9.90
3.60
0.25
2.50
6.30
0.85
1.25
3.00
3.00
2.35
1.20
3. IS
4.50
3.90
0.20
FUEL
ECON
io.i
12.3
11.3
10.1
13.3
13.6
17.1
16.8
10.9
11.3
17.6
19.7
13.9
10.5
19.5
14.1
14.6
12.2
11.6
9.7
11.5
11.6
13.0
11.1
13.3
10.4
13.0
10.2
12.5
11.1
-------
3-22
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN CRAMS PER MILE
LOS ANOELES
1975 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
29
30
30R
31
32
33
34
35
34.
37
38
39
40
41
42
42R
43
44
45
45R
44.
47
48
49
YR MAKE
70 FORD
70 VOLK
70 CHEV
68 CHEV
70 BUIC
66 RAMB
72 FORD
72 OLDS
72 FORD
70 CHEV
66 CHEV
72 DATS
66 CHEV
67 BUIC
72 FORD
68 DODG
71 FORD
69 BUIC
70 CHEV
66 CHEV
71 MERC
72 PLYM
68 PONT
72 DODO
68 CHEV
72 FORD
69 FORD
71 CHEV
71 CHEV
68 FORD
71 FORD
69 FORD
69 CADI
70 MERC
66 FORD
68 VOLK
71 DATS
71 PONT
67 PONT
70 FORD
67 CHEV
67 CHEV
66 PONT
71 PLYM
70 FORD
70 FORD
71 FORD
69 MERC
69 CHEV
69 FORD
CID
250
97
307
327
455
232
3O2
350
400
307 .
327
72
327
340
122
333
429
350
350
283
302
318
400
360
327
302
302
140
140
200
351
390
472
351
289
91
146
400
326
250
250
250
389
318
351
351
250
390
330
390
HC
4. 07
3. 23
3. 37
8. 48
5. 39
2. 94
2. 25
3. 33
2. 27
5. 36
5. 61
2. 52
9. 43
2. 38
3. 33
3. 59
4. 91
3. 32
2. 53
3. 36
3. 40
3. 99
2. 45
7. 54
7. 94
4. 10
6. 77
2. 63
2 44
3. 02
2. 64
3. 51
1. 04
8. 48
3. 52
5. 10
4. 27
4. 10
2. 85
2. 94
1. 21
0. 99
3. 85
3. 48
3. 69
3. 49
2 65
6. 31
4. 71
3. 12
CO
39. 87
34. 11
33. 37
85. 32
94. 99
79. 41
32. 5O
34. 90
34. 73
87. 12
89. 97
23. 01
153. 63
56. 17
27. 49
88. 64
80. 01
59. 72
26. 69-
21. 32
68. 73
96. 43
32. 10
110. 78
58. 83
73. 63
73. 24
'41. 80
43. 19
30 34
68. 76
18. 59
3O. 73
116. 6O
38. 44
103. 16
40. 11
66. 37
48. 44
51. 38
18. 23
18. 61
78. 74
75. 12
81. 35
61. 95
44. 41
113. 12
46. 31
111. 93
C02
405. 08
325. 41
588. 47
499. 82
633. 88
397. 38
726. 68
718. 00
839. 01
524 33
541. 28
273. 36
454. 62
552. 95
353. 18
585. 94
638. 20
553. 03
649. 87
512. 66
665. 12
538. 41
761. 60
610. 39
526. 97
630. 62
332. 86
377. 93
367. 78
528. 07
319. 29
640. 03
1124. 66
590. 01
333. 31
259. 63
409. 47
733. 06
682 92
424. 72
709. 67
503. 98
498. 89
445. 04
695. 53
676. 80
522 74
649. 04
487. 16
338. 22
NO
4. 64
3/28
4. 32
3. 64
3. 88
2. 27
2. 98
3. 02
3. 88
3. 19
3. 46
2. 49
1. 88
1. 37
3. 17
2. 62
4. 22
4. 40
3. 40
4. 02
2. 32
2. 09
3. 23
2. 58
4. 78
3. 09
6. 47
3. 10
2. 88
3. 19
2. 32
3. 16
3. 39
4. 67
2. 01
1. 43
2. 77
3. 47
2. 60
2. 41
3. 14
2. 58
2. 86
2. 38
2. 07
1. 88
2. 42
3. 67
3. 31
3. 76
N02
1. 91
0. 64
1. 34
1. 01
1. 30
0. 41
0. 39
0. 82
1. 28
0. 63
1. 17
0. 43
0. 37
0. 20
0. 85
0. 83
1. 39
1. 26
0. 89
1. 68
0 36
0. 33
0 88
0. 66
2 34
1. 12
2 86
0. 63
0. 62
2. 37
0. 74
2. 32
0. 94
1. 66
0. 46
0. 15
0. 63
0. 85
0 50
0. 33
0. 64
0. 50
0. 62
0. 61
0. 30
0. 33
0. 49
1. 16
0. 96
1 23
NOX
6. 55
3. 92
3. 66
4. 63
3. 18
2 68
3. 57
3. 84
5. 16
3. 84
4. 63
2. 92
2. 25
1 57
4. 02
3. 45
5. 61
5. 66
4. 29
3. 70
2. 68
2. 42
4 11
3. 24
7. 12
4. 21
9. 33
3. 73
3. 50
7. 56
3. 26
7. 48
4. 53
6. 33
2. 47
1. 38
3. 42
4. 32
3. 10
2. 74
3. 78
3. 08
3. 48
2. 99
2. 37
2. 21
2. 91
4. 83
4. 47
4. 99
NOXC
6. 08
3. 74
3. 30
4. 48
4. 77
2. 33
3. 31
3. 80
5. 04
3. 63
4. 62
2. 94
2. 19
1. 48
3. 83
3. 10
4. 95
5. 49
4. IS
3. 81
2. 73
2. 39
3. 91
3. 10
7. 28
4. 13
9. 93
3. 55
3. 69
7 53
3. 27
7. 29
4. 61
6. 48
2. 38
1. 45
3. 31
4. 25
3. 01
2. 62
3. 63
2. 90
3. 15
2. 76
2. 25
2. 19
2. 60
4. 94
4. 15
4. 84
JCO
7.00
2.75
1.00
0.80
2.5P
3. CO
1.75
1.50
0.10
5.00
5.50
3.20
6 .20
1.50
2.50
0.80
6.50
3.50
0.50
2.UO
5.50
9.00
0.83
6.50
6.50
5.80
6.50
0.80
0.80
2.20
9.00
O.C2
0.25
10.00
1.60
6. no
2.50
0.20
U.CO
2.10
1.90
1 .90
2.25
6. CO
0.50
0.50
3.50
6.80
7.50
7.30
FUEL
ECON
17.3
22.8
13.5
13.4
11.1
16.7
11.3
10.9
9.9
13.1
12.7
27.5
12.2
13.7
21.8
11.9
11.4
13.5
12.7
15.9
11.3
12.6
10.8
11.0
13.8
11.7
13.2
19.6
20.0
15.2
20.4
13.0
7.5
11.1
14.7
20.3
18.3
10.4
11.6
17.2
12.0
16.5
14.0
15.5
10.6
10.8
14.8
10.5
15.4
12.2
-------
3-23
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
LOS ANOELES
1973 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
50
31
52
53
54
56
57
58
59
60
61
.62
62R
63
64
65
67
63
69
70
71
72
73
74
73
76
77
78
79
30
31
32
83
84
36
87
88
39
90
91
92
93
94
95
.96
97
98
99
100
101
YR MAKE
67 FORD
68 BUIC
67 MERC
63 PONT
71 CHEV
71 DODO
66 FORD
70 FORD
66 VOLK
69 PONT
70 FORD
71 CHEV
71 CHEV
70 CHEV
70 PONT
66 PLYM
70 CHEV
70 OLDS
68 FORD
69 PONT
69 OLDS
69 CHEV
71 TOYO
66 PONT
71 FORD
71 VOLK
68 PLYM
71 BUIC
69 OLDS
72 FORD
70 AMER
72 BUIC
68 FORD
70 DODC
66 BUIC
71 CHEV
68 OLDS
7O BUIC
71 VOLK
70 PLYM
67 OLDS
63 FORD
71 PLYM
67 VOLK
68 MERC
69 BUIC
69 VOLK
71 FORD
70 CHRY
69 CHEV
CID
289
350
410
350
350
318
200
302
78
400
351
350
330
402
350
223
307
350
302
400
330
230
113
389
351
97
318
455
455
429
304
330
390
225
340
350
455
435
97
383
425
390
225
91
302
43O
97
98
440
327
HC
3 22
22 27
7. 75
6. 13
3. 67
3. 81
4. 17
4. 86
53. 37
4. 07
3. 29
2. 81
2 83
17. 71
4. 49
6. 31
5. 53
3. 34
4. 77
4. 65
3. 26
5. 16
2. 09
3. 84
3. 21
6. 24
4. 47
2. 84
2. 89
3. 48
5. 10
1. 44
4. 66
2. 85
4. 02
4. 23
4. 73
3. 28
4. 27
5. 09
3. 98
4. 50
4. 76
20. 60
21. 71
2. 25
5. 08
8. 11
8. 81
28. 49
CO
43. 54
24. 27
129. 53
34. 18
70. 43
92. 66
123. 69
76. 05
183. 21
61. 39
33. OO
31. 34
27. 28
163. 04
71. 17
123 99
52. 65
56. 30
54. 99
82. 72
47. 34
62. 01
35. 26
44. 89
31. 32
55. 37
27. 37
33. 64
49. 26
91. OS
67. 03
24. 87
67. 69
54. 27
93. 19
52. 46
59. 26
89. 43
49.39
78. 56
55. 26
15. 44
100. 61
113. 56
50. 12
43. 34
82. 85
26. 20
120. 13
161. 78
C02
395 29
602. 55
624. 53
564. 96
674 29
517. 69
4O2. 10
319. 12
181. 28
643. 06
667 57
661. 31
682. 95
389. 64
608 51
386. 01
454. 87
630 41
306. 29
588. 65
666 82
369. 95
344. 96
584. 08
600. 47
395. 47
3O5. 74
779. 53
600. 88
685. 90
569. 01
610. 24
512. 43
358. 90
463. 09
583. 48
535. 36
557. 79
277. 33
336. 13
583. O4
512. 51
331. 00
192. 67
523. 92
744. 04
310. 98
305. 25
600. 64
385. 19
NO
2. 59
4. 03
2. 56
4. 29
3. 41
2. 37
1. 12
3. 69
0. 48
3. 64
5. 02
3. 27
3. 32
1. 08
3. 59
2. 69
4. 82
3. 37
4. 87
4. 04
3. 31
3. 25
3. 46
5. 17
3. 33
3. 03
3. 02
4. 13
4. 11
2. 54
2. 79
3. 53
3. 75
5. 02
0. 78
4. 73
4. 85
4. 32
2. 42
4. 05
3. 77
3. 61
1. 61
1. 42
2. 36
3. 73
2. 01
2. S3
4. 07
2. 71
N02
0. 66
1. 52
0. 60
2. 22
0. 99
0. 62
0. 13
1. 39
0. 04
1. 04
2 21
0. 88
0. 86
0. 13
1. 07
0 82
2. 00
0. 75
2. 46
0. 90
0. 65
0. 83
1. 09
2 13
0. 84
0 68
2. 03
1. 37
1. 16
0. 43
0. 41
1. 19
0. 85
2. 04
0. 08
1. 79
2. 06
1. 34
0. 71
1. 05
1. 00
0. 83
0. 28
0. 08
0. 62
0. 84
0. 25
0. 63
1. 25
1. 19
NOX
3. 23
3. 57
3. 16
6. 51
4. 40
2. 99
1. 23
5. 08
0. 52
4. 68
7. 23
4. 15
4. 18
1. 21
4. 66
3 51
6. 82
4. 12
7. 33
4. 94
3. 96
4. 08
4. 55
7. 35
4. 19
3. 71
7. 05
5. 52
5. 27
2. 99
3. 20
4. 74
4. 60
7. 06
0. 86
6. 52
6. 91
6. 36
3. 13
3. 10
4. 77
4. 44
1. 89
1. 50
2. 98
4. 59
2. 26
3. 16
5. 3?
3. 90
NOXC
3. 17
5. 82
3. 02
6. 21
4. 27
3. O9
1. 17
4. 65
O. 52
4. 47
6. 90
4 14
4. O8
1. 20
4. 34
3. 37
6. 15
4. 00
6. 6O
4. 90
3. 89
3. 83
4. 6O
7. I/
3. 89
3. 75
6. 71
b. 03
4. 85
2. 79
3. 05
4. 24
3. 91
6. 42
0. 75
S. 63
6. 59
3. 93
2. 88
5. 08
4. 64
4. 33
1. 92
1. 43
2. 53
•V 27
2. 17
2. 30
4. 97
3. 67
ICO..
0.60
0.10
4.00
6.80
1 .25
7.80
10.00
7.00
1. 00
4.20
0.15
0.10
0.10
5.00
1 .30
10. CO
6.0C
5.50
2. CO
5.50
4.30
0.40
1 .60
4.40
1 .10
2.00
0.05
3.00
2.50
5. GO
2.00
2.50
5.20
2.50
1.CO
3.40
5.20
5.20
3.20
6.80
6.40
0.40
0.8C
2.40
0.8C
2.60
4.80
C.20
14.90
10.00
FUEL
ECON
18.7
12.5
10.4
12.4
11.1
13.1
14.6
13.6
18.9
11.8
12.2
12.3
12.0
9.8
12.1
14.7
16.0
12.1
14.6
12.1
11.8
18.3
21.8
13.3
13.4
17.7
15.8
10.2
12.9
10.6
12.9
13.6
14.0
19.6
14.2
13.0
13.8
12.4
24.1
12.8
13.0
16.1
17.6
20.3
13.2
10.7
19.4
23.8
in. ?
12.2
-------
3-24
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
LOS ANGELES
1975 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
102
103
104
105
106
1O7
108
1O9
110
111
112
113
114
115
117
118
119
120
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
149R
130
150R
151
YR MAKE
68 CHRY
69 FORD
68 CHEV
71 LINC
68 FORD
67 PLYM
72 CHEV
72 FORD
70 FORD
7O PLYM
72 CHRY
67 CHEV
66 DODG
66 MERC
67 CHRY
68 CADI
66 OLDS
70 VOLK
72 CHEV
68 CHEV
72 CHEV
67 FORD
66 CADI
67 PONT
70 TOYO
67 CHEV
72 CHEV
67 FORD
69 PLYM
72 CHEV
67 CHEV
67 AMER
71 DODG
69 CHEV
68 CHEV
71 OPEL
72 OLDS
71 OLDS
71 BUIC
72 TOYO
69 PLYM
71 CHEV
72 CHEV
71 CHEV
67 CHEV
69 CHEV
69 CHEV
68 RAMB
68 RAMB
70 PONT
CID
383
302
307
460
289
318
40O
351
3O2
318
40O
250
383
390
383
472
330
97
350
307
350
390
429
400
116
327
350
289
318
140
327
232
383
307
230
116
455
455
455
120
318
350
350
350
283
327
327
290
290
350
HC
7. 53
3. 78
7. 73
3. 57
11. 84
7. 62
1 66
4. 01
8. 10
4 14
3. 56
2. 21
3. 72
2. 65
9. 37
2. 93
8. 29
2. 91
1. 46
4. 59
26. 79
4. 82
2. 74
3. 98
3. 40
2. 92
0. 99
4 37
4 87
2. 02
7. 98
2. 81
2. 67
5. 23
1. 96
6. 03
1. 88
2. 41
5. 42
3. 21
3 99
9. 61
3. 73
3. 27
5. 26
7. 03
3. 70
3. 91
3. 46
33. 29
CO
123. 60
76. 69
105. 48
60. 76
39 19
167. 86
21 05
76. 80
134 04
59. 62
75. 28
63. 17
55. 78
49 80
145. 21
53. 83
111 18
30. 18
29. 48
59. 77
45. 45
51. 20
48. 01
64. 26
85 66
36. 08
13. 46
107. 32
90. 04
48. 16
133. 40
21. 65
90. 83
115. 57
45. 28
59. 77
24. 32
56. 08
148. 60
37. 60
78. 33
61. 01
56. 19
30. 16
62. 06
76. 09
63. 65
31. 87
53. 63
84. 92
CO2
329. 43
430 09
430. 42
762. 12
439. 86
434 45
824 65
663. 65
511. 41
545. 64
674. 75
567. 76
591 82
728. 20
535. 76
738. 45
451. 90
301. 03
658. 17
515. 37
598. 67
340. 07
670. 42
610. 43
361. 97
689 33 .
744. 38
504. 48
339. 41
401. 90
548. 36
441. 43
594. 29
441. 70
520. 04
371. O6
900. 78
813. 96
720. 95
344. 33
549. 81
610. 72
668. 83
594. 96
540. 60
591. 53
658. 30
320. 71
517. 52
622. 11
NO
4. 12
3. 08
3 50
4. 29
4. 36
1. 01
2. 90
3. 39
1. 94
3. 35
4. 24
2. 67
4. 40
2. 68
2 42
5. 22
2. 49
2. 6O
2. 34
3 OS
2. 16
4. 64
5 21
5. 54
2. 55
4. 12
1 97
1. 83
4. 61,
2. 10
3. 61
4. 90
3. 29
2. 54
2. 02
4. 62
4. 13
3. 95
1. 83
3. 48
3. 55
2. 63
2. 26
2. 87
3. 38
4. 11
3. 17
3. 87
3. 78
4. 36
N02
1 55
0 67
0. 80
1. 56
1. 69
0. 08
0. 36
0. 72
0. 19
2. 08
1. 28
0 7O
1 13
0. 50
0. 49
2 07
0. 37
0. 43
0 48
0. 33
0. 34
1. 41
2 11
2 29
0. 71
1 05
0. 34
0 24
1 07
0. 29
0 83
1. 74
0 67
0. 36
0. 45
1 22
1. 81
0 99
0. 2O
0 83
0. 73
0. 28
0. 58
0. 56
0. 67
1. 23
0. 48
0. 87
0. 68
1 41
NOX
5. 67
3. 75
4. 30
3. 85
6. 05
1 09
3. 46
4 11
2. 13
7. 63
5. 52
3. 37
5. 53
3. 18
2. 91
7. 29
2. 86
3. 03
3. 02
3. 58
2. 50
6. 05
7. 32 .
7. 83
3. 26
5. 17
2. 31
2. 07
5. 68
2. 39
4. 44
6. 64
3. 96
2. 90
2. 47
5. 84
5. 94
4. 94
2. 03
4. 31
4. 28
2. 91
2. 84
3. 43
4. 25
3. 34
3. 65
4. 74
4. 46
3. 77
NOXC
5 30
3. 53
4. 11
b. 87
5. 64
1. 01
3. 31
3. 86
1. 99
6 89
5. 50
3. 16
5. 31
2. 80
2. 77
/. 56
2. 67
2. 88
2 8-1
3. 09
2 33
5. 58
6. 2O
7. 32
2 97
4. 82
2. 16
1. 32
4. 89
2. 44
4. 15
6. 26
3. 71
2 71
2. 31
5. 32
5. 83
4. 68
1. 94
4. 20
3. 92
2. 84
2. 77
3. 31
4. 18
3. 10
3. 59
1. 59
4. 29
5. 71
ICO
fl.2C
2.B1
5.2P
1.75
6.00
«. CO
0.10
3.60
5.00
2.90
5.50
3.UO
1 ."0
1 .7?
u.f C
1.1"
9.^
0.70
0.7=.
2.er
n. re
<• .25
2.80
6. SO
O.UO
0.20
0.10
2.UO
S.OC
2.5"
7.50
0.90
2.70
6. CO
7. CO
10. OC
".30
2.60
3.UO
i*. 10
3. 70
0.80
6.00
O.flO
3.30
3.60
3.60
0.90
0.90
2.RO
FUEL
ECON
11.9
15.8
13.9
10.2
15.9
12.3
10.3
11.1
11.9
13.6
11.0
13.2
12.8
10.9
10.5
10.7
13.6
24.8
12.5
14.2
11.8
14.0
11.8
12.3
17.5
11.8
11.5
12.9
12.7
18.2
11.3
18.3
11.9
13.9
14.9
18.3
9.4
9.8
9.1
21.5
12.9
12.0
11.5
13.6
13.6
12.1
11.5
14.4
14.5
10.3
-------
3-25
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
LOS ANGELES
1973 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR YR
151R 70
152 71
153 72
154 71
155 71
156 72
157 66
157R 66
158 72
159 . 71
160 72
161 67
162 72
163 72
164 72
165 72
167 72
168 72
169 72
169R 72
170 72
170R 72
172 72
173 69
174 70
175 69
176 70
177 66
178 72
179 72
MAKE
PONT
OLDS
MERC
CHEV
PONT
AMER
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
DODC
DODG
PONT
CADI
VOLK
PLYM
VOLK
BUIC
BUIC
BUIC
PLYM
PLYM
PONT
DODC
OLDS
FORD
DODO
FORD
CHEV
FORD
CID
35O
350
400
400
350
258
233
283
350
351
225
225
350
472
97
360
102
455
455
455
340
340
400
440
350
250
440
390
402
302
HC
34. 83
1. 72
2. 72
2. 79
4 24
1. 65
5. 02
4. 30
2. 13
3. 44
2. 09
3. 05
2. 97
0. 87
2. 62
2. 91
2. 59
3. 19
2. 47
2. 29
5. 31
4. 05
3. 50
4. 96
5. 52
2. 73
15. 93
3. 68
1. 95
3. 42
CO
81. 73
34. 33
43. 41
30. 87
86. 44
22. 93
87. 23
71. 35
42. 62
46. 34
61. 86
39. 56
38. 23
22 95
39. 68
45. 83
37. 38
64. 92
13. 70
13. 26
79. 18
78. 31
35. 28
50. 86
99. 01
33. 72
173. 91
88. 77
33. 13
47. 73
C02
719. 38
778. 77
836. 53
746. 45
637. 68
SIS. 84
603. 07
570. 04
700. 33
562. 24
538. 28
447. 53
693. 33
997. 07
354. 36
798. 17
422. 02
891. 31
847. 55
832. 40
532. 22
531. 44
785. 34
660. 52
588. 71
462. 38
557. 12
802. 66
814. 09
739. 13
NO
4. 13
3 84
6. 08
3. 82
3. 10
3. 86
2. 99
3. 30
2. 39
3. 62
2. 67
4. 87
3. 19
3. 71
2. 18
3. 27
2. 73
2. 94
3 87
3. 75
3. 87
3. 27
3. 69
2. 30
3. 78
5. 19
2. 55
3. 29
2. 69
3. 11
N02
1. 08
1. 03
2. 33
0. 30
0. 49
0. 96
0. 63
0. 87
0. 47
0 99
0. 47
1. 71
0. 67
1. 02
O. 19
0. 84
0. 63
0. 74
1. 09
1 12
1 16
0. 95
1 75
0 35
1. 21
1. 89
0. 62
0. 72
0. 64
0. 56
NOX
3. 23
4. 87
8. 41
4. 62
3. 59
4. 82
3. 62
4. 17
2. 86
4. 61
3. 14
6. 53
3. 86
4. 73
2. 37
4. 11
3. 36
3. 68
4. 96
4. 87
5. 03
4. 22
5. 44
2. 65
4. 99
7 08
3. 17
4. 01
3. 33
3. 67
NOXC
3 10
4. 68
8. 08
4. 48
3. 48
4. 70
3. 45
4. 06
2. 76
4. 50
3. 08
6. 36
3. 78
4. 64
2. 32
4 00
3. 23
3. 4:3
4. 65
4. 76
4. 80
4. 12
5. 20
2. 53
4. 84
6. 92
3. 11
4. 08
3. 70
3. 78
igo
2.80
0.20
0.10
n.15
3.00
0.7C
10.00
10. CO
U.20
2.70
5.20
1 .20
0.60
1.25
0.65
0.20
O.«0
2.50
0.20
0.20
5.50
5.5C
0.65
0.25
6. CO
1 .60
8.90
5.CO
0.50
0.20
FUEL
ECON
9.2
10.6
9.5
11.0
11.0
15.9
11.7
12.7
11.5
13.7
13.8
17.1
11.6
8.6
20.9
10.1
18.1
8.8
10.1
10.3
13.2
13.3
10.4
11.7
11.7
16.8
10.0
9.3
10.1
10.8
-------
3-26
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1973 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
29
30
31
32
34
36
37
38
39
40
41
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
52
53
54
55
55R
56
YR MAKE
67 VOLK
72 CHEV
66 CADI
72 BUIC
71 PONT
72 DODO
72 CHRY
72 PLYM
67 CHEV
66 FORD
67 CHEV
67 DODO
69 BUIC
66 VOLK
70 DODO
69 CHEV
72 MERC
66 CHEV
70 MERC
69 FORD
68 RAMB
69 CADI
72 BUIC
68 VOLK
72 CADI
71 LINC
72 TOYO
66 CHEV
72 DATS
67 FORD
66 PONT
67 CHRY
72 VOLK
67 OLDS
68 BUIC
66 CHEV
66 FORD
67 PONT
68 PONT
66 DODO
67 PLYM
67 FORD
68 PLYM
68 OLDS
67 CHEV
66 FORD
68 CHEV
66 MERC
66 MERC
71 FORD
CID
91
35O
429
455
453
225
400
318
283
289
327
225
430
78
318
396
351
283
351
429
290
472
350
91
472
460
120
233
97
390
389
383
97
330
350
283
390
400
400
383
273
289
318
350
327
200
327
289
289
351
HC
5. 78
3. 03
10. 38
2. 22
4. O9
2. 27
3. 26
2 52
11. 91
4. 76
6. 16
4. 36
4. 97
5. 10
7. 49
5. 96
2. 76
6. 49
4. 04
3. 03
1 99
2. 48
3. 83
19. 40
2. 12
3. 69
2 15
14. 65
2 32
5. 37
3. 45
8. 20
2. 79
6. 76
5. 38
7. 18
6. 89
9. 74
5. 50
7. 63
9. 03
5. 31
3. 13
4. 90
7. 95
5. 50
9. 38
4. 62
4. 41
3. 37
CO
48. 93
26. 43
223. 81
12. 08
13 10
22. 13
40. 36
8. 81
161. 33
48. 98
SO. 51
82. 18
72. 06
66. 72
28. 43
115. 07
17. 04
55. 44
23. 16
24. 64
13. 49
29. 80
33. 49
119. 3O
20. 79
29. 17
21. 66
141. 37
30. 89
49. 86
123. 71
184. 63
31. 64
105. 57
133. 01
61. 45
100. 28
133. 90
87. 78
43. 82
75. 83
118. 30
24. 91
57. 50
119. 24
42. 73
109. 30
18. 87
13. 89
35. 19
C02
266. 30
659. 05
531. 17
758. 71
658 75
439. 86
615. 75
349. 39
373. 53
439. 00
430. 71
315. 07
510. 20
220. 65
615. 06
541. 69
740. 71
499. 27
588. 95
364. 68
306 13
797. 74
689. 27
293. 99
889. 08
703. 61
380. 75
422. 80
305. 24
566. 28
408. 61
437. 04
312. 73
679. 99
516. 06
463. 64
436. 05
549. 65
561. 51
562. 43
452. 30
415. 77
517. 42
567. 10
478. 76
384. 40
506. 85
491. 30
479. 43
395. 68
NO
1. 53
2. 95
0. 92
3. 41
5. 69
4. 28
4. 86
4. O4
1. 58
5. 51
2. 93
2. 35
4. 32
0. 94
4. 90
2 38
4. 78
2. 73
3. 20
2. 81
2. 62
5 54
4 76
1. 73
3. 22
6. 44
3. 60
2. 07
2. 88
3. 90
0. 27
1 35
2. 45
3. 09
3. 33
4. 24
2. 75
2. 50
5. 00
4. 11
4. 85
2. 13
4. 69
5. 05
4. 31
4. 23
3. 83
4. 24
4. 23
3. 64
N02
0. 12
0. 33
0. 08
1. 75
1. 74
1. 07
1. 02
0. 31
0. 21
1. 71
0. 51
0. 25
1. 79
0. 07
1. 08
0. 20
1. 16
0. 44
0. 69
0. 43
0. 45
1. 65
1. 42
0. 21
1. 91
2. 58
1 09
0. 38
0. 58
. 1. 96
O. 03
0. 18
0. 43
0. 76
0. 61
1. 09
0. 33
0. 37
1. 82
1. 29
1. 62
0. 32
. 90
. 79
. 56
. 42
. 23
. 37
. 33
0. 92
NOX
1. 65
3. 48
1. 00
7. 16
7. 43
3. 35
3. 88
4. 85
1. 79
7. 22
3. 44
2. 60
6. 11
1. 01
3. 98
2. 38
3. 94
3. 17
3. 89
3. 24
3. 07
7. 19
6. 16
1. 96
7. 13
9. 02
4. 69
2. 45
3. 46
7. 86
0. 3O
1. 73
2. 88
3. 85
3. 94
3. 33
3. 28
2. 87
6. 82
5. 40
6. 47
2. 45
6. 59
6. 84
5. 87
5. 65
5. 08
5. 61
3. 60
4. 56
NOXC
1. 33
3. 14
0. 94
7. 67
6. 33
4. 92
5. 35
4. 71
1. 69
6. 34
3. 14
'i 33
5 55
0 94
5. 13
2. 21
5. 37
2. 73
3. 52
2. 70
2 14
6. 07
5. 24
1 77
6. 04
7. 93
4. 12
2. 13
2. 86
6. 83
0. 25
1. 50
2. 36
3. 59
3. 37
4. 74
2. 99
2. 59
5. 92
4. 69
5. 72
2. 21
5. 77
5. 72
5. 22
S. Ol
4. 46
5. 28
4. 52
3. 87
ICO
1 .20
0.10
1.CO
1.20
0.10
C.5C
0.50
0.10
7.50
1 .85
•!.30
7. 1C
2.20
5.20
C.50
0.90
0.10
2.10
1.65
<».or
1.PO
C.10
0 .50
2.20
O.C5
3.05
J.20
1.50
0.0
2.eo
1 .00
tt.60
2.10
tt.OO
5.UO
1.50
3.80
3.80
8.20
5.80
8.8C
7. HO
0.25
2.PO
9.20
0.10
2.5C
9.<«5
O.U5
5.20
FUEL
ECON
23.3
12.5
9.7
11.3
12.8
18.4
12.9
15.5
13.3
16.7
16.8
19.4
13.9
26.0
13.0
12.0
11.4
14.6
13.9
21.5
26.6
10.4
11.8
16.3
9.6
11.7
21.1
12.8
24.6
13.4
14.0
11.8
23.9
10.2
11.9
15.2
14.4
11.2
12.4
13.5
14.8
14.3
15.7
13.2
12.8
18.9
12.5
16.6
17.1
13.4
-------
3-27
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1973 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
37
58
39
60
61
62
63
64
63
66
67
63
69
70
72
73
74
75
76
78
79
79R
80
81
82
83
84
83
83R
86
87
83
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
95R
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
YR MAKE
72 BUIC
68 FORD
63 MERC
66 CHEV
69 CHEV
68 FORD
71 FORD
69 PONT
69 DODG
69 PLYM
69 OLDS
63 CHEV
69 CHEV
70 PLYM
69 FORD
70 FORD
68 CHRY
70 PLYM
72 CHEV
69 PLYM
67 CHEV
67 CHEV
71 OLDS
68 DODO
70 CHEV
70 VOLK
69 VOLK
68 CHEV
68 CHEV
66 RAMB
69 MERC
68 CHEV
68 CHEV
72 CHEV
68 FORD
69 FORD
69 OLDS
70 AMER
69 BUIC
69 BUIC
70 VOLK
71' FORD
67 RAMB
69 CHEV
70 CHEV
69 CHEV
69 PONT
72 AMER
66 OLDS
70 PONT
CID
455
302
302
194
3O7
302
122
400
383
318
453
230
230
318
3O2
250
383
318
140
318
327
327
453
318
3SO
97
91
307
307
232
428
327
307
400
390
302
350
232
350
350
97
200
232
307
350
327
350
232
330
400
HC
2. 17
3. 42
3. 98
7. 18
3. 63
3. 17
3. 42
14. 34
6. SO
3. 73
. 5. 51
12. 86
3 96
3. 29
5. 01
4. 84
4. 90
10. 35
1. 00
4. 76
8. 32
6. 69
2. 19
4. 48
3. 86
1. 88
3. 62
8. 74
8. 93
5. 13
6. 04
5. 86
6. 32
2. 52
4. 40
3. 43
3. 86
2. 03
2. 66
2. 89
2. 13
2. 28
8. 30
6. 17
4. 68
20. 12
4. 67
2. 09
8. 10
8. 73
CO
24. 53
33. 78
15. 37
112. 96
36. 05
19. 39
44. 31
140. 43
87. 33
31. 49
98. 50
85 12
38. 21
32. 71
76. 14
36. 25
71. 33
67. 21
20. 43
41. 68
122. 34
102. 73
12. 83
33. 22
98. 08
16. 39
31. 75
106. 46
102. 90
81. 94
116. 08
43. 17
76. 84
41. 70
28. 69
30. 41
46. 63
16. 92
35. 74
36. 73
35. 02
25. 81
111. 07
88. 63
42. 17
196. 83
36. 22
10. 03
94. 71
12. 39
C02
873. 75
605. 43
497. 11
352. 14
462. 36
535. 87
326. 47
456. 16
448. 44
522. 04
694. 36
468. 89
438. 08
657. 22
521. 8O
409. 4O
562. 93
517. 97
367. 13
514. 52
376. 83
378. 09
693. 26
472. 10
671. 82
33S. 69
298. 07
452. 24
469. 3O
361. 81
534. 31
399. 65
501. 60
861. 57
384. 26
361. 96
395. 62
302. 20
570. 10
547. 19
297. 04
394. 58
409. 32
309. 40
368. 39
346. 47
393. 78
476. 84
601. OS
795. 93
NO
4. 82
4. 85
4. 54
3. 24
4. 82
2. 90
2. 89
3. 47
2. 31
5. 20
6. 18
4. 96
3. 30
6. 97
2. 87
2. 96
4. 27
4. 77
2. 50
3. 64
1. 63
1. 82
3. 06
4 33
2. 48
2. 44
1. 63
2. 46
2. 33
2. 96
2. O4
3. 20
2. 49
3. 43
3. 10
5. OO
2. 99
3. 02
3. 12
4. 69
3. 41
3. 28
1. 84
4. 44
4. 81
1. 36
5. 42
3. 31
2. 79
3. 81
NO2
1. 93
1. 81
1. 38
1 0. 73
1 51
0. 64
0. 65
1. 09
0. 39
1. 93
2. 37
2. O6
O. 74
4. 27
0. 74
0. 66
1. 16
1. 33
0 40
1. 08
0. 24
0 18
2 01
1. 44
0. 38
0. 30
0. 18
0. 33
0. 43
O. 58
0. 26
0. 62
0. 41
0. 74
0. 52
1. 40
0. 50
0. 72
1. 73
1. 48
1. 02
O. 84
0. 25
I. 24
0. 64
0. 27
1. 81
2. 19
O. 65
0. 93
NOX
6. 75
6. 66
3. 92
3. 99
6. 33
3. 54
3. 54
4. 56
2. 70
7 13
8. 55
7. 02
4. 04
11. 24
3. 61
3. 62
5. 43
6. 32
2. 90
4. 72
1. 87
2. 00
7. 07
5. 77
2. 86
2. 74
1. 81
2. 79
2. 96
3. 54
2. 30
3. 82
2. 9O
4. 17
3. 62
6. 40
3. 49
3. 74
6. 85
6. 17
4. 43
4. 12
2. 09
5. 68
3. 43
1. 63
7. 23
7. 70
3. 44
4. 74
NOXC
6. 01
3. 88
5. 07
3. 61
5. 54
3. 16
3. 35
3. 77
2. 37
6. 29
8. 13
6. 19
4. O5
9 43
3 48
3. 19
5. 72
5. 71
2. 60
4. 63
1. 79
1 93
6 74
3. 54
2. 78
2. 68
1. 73
2. 73
2. 90
3. 33
2. 19
3. 80
2. 74
4. 29
3. 67
6. 53
3. 36
3. 83
6. 44
5. 72
4. 11
3 84
1. 90
5 23
3. 02
1. 57
6. 32
7. 82
3. 34
4. 62
ICO
1 .50
0.60
1.25
9.20
5.80
0.70
0.85
}.CO
5.20
3.20
e.f 0
10. CO
1.00
5.10
8.00
a. eo
2.10
1.i»0
0.80
0.50
5.«1
5.UO
0.80
6.PO
9.60
1.CO
1.75
5.60
5.60
ft. 00
U.20
0.60
3.60
0.20
1.20
1.25
2.20
2.20
2.20
2.10
1.00
0.15
1 .80
6.00
U.60
10.0"
1 .95
0.25
U.60
".25
FUEL
ECON
9.7
13.1
16.6
16.1
16.5
15.4
21.8
12.3
14.6
15.2
10.2
13.8
17.4
12.3
13.5
18.4
12.9
13.5
22.1
14.9
14.9
15.8
12.3
16.4
10.6
24.1
24.7
13.7
13.4
17.5
11.7
18.3
13.8
9.5
13.8
14.3
13.0
26.5
14.0
14.4
24.7
20.1
14.5
13.3
13.7
12.3
13.3
17.8
11.4
10.5
-------
3-28
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1973 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR YR
107 72
1O8 70
109 70
110 71
1 1 OR 71
111 69
112 68
113 72
114 72
115 70
116 70
117 70
118 72
119 70
120 70
121 70
122 71
124 71
125 72
126 72
127 72
128 71
129 71
130 68
131 71
131R 71
132 72
133 71
134 71
135 71
137 72
138 72
140 72
141 67
142 69
144 71
143 70
145R 70
146 71
147 71
148 72
148R 72
149 71
151 72
152 71
153 71
154 70
155 71
157 72
158 66
MAKE
FORD
OLDS
BUIC
TOYO
TOYO
FORD
FORD
OLDS
FORD
CHEV
CHRY
CHEV
CHEV
OLDS
FORD
FORD
PLYM
FORD
VOLK
FORD
PONT
BUIC
CHEV
CADI
DODG
DODG
FORD
CHEV
DODG
PLYM
PLYM
PLYM
DODG
CHEV
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
OPEL
FORD
FORD
FORD
VOLK
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
DODG
VOLK
CHEV
BUIC
CID
122
350
350
71
71
240
200
350
302
230
440
350
350
455
200
351
360
302
97
429
400
350
307
472
225
223
351
307
383
318
225
340
318
230
302
400
351
351
66
351
400
400
97
350
400
307
383
97
307
340
HC
3. 16
3. 83
7. 90
2. 77
2. 67
5. 32
5. 57
4. 36
3. 61
2. 03
18. S3
4 50
4. 82
2. 67
2. 66
3 54
4 43
3. 42
2. 16
3. 40
4 42
2. 54
3 78
1. 96
2. 93
2. 84
3. 53
3. 55
12 16
2. 87
2. 81
5. 11
3. 26
15. 27
3. 40
3. 92
4. 41
4. 95
2 55
5. 20
3. 69
3. 89
4. 37
4. 23
2. 86
5. 63
33. 42
4. 37
2. 98
7. OS
CO
28. 38
33. 64
114. 32
23. 96
23 71
97. 77
104. 41
83. 05
54. 28
19. 37
47. 27
66. 37
28. 29
37. 73
8. 16
33. 98
77. 63
24. 26
9 77
27. 77
78. 33
46. 84
44. 43
31. 32
50. 18
43. 79
19. 60
26. 74
212. 15
22. 27
30 65
69. OS
23. 91
130. 34
17. 34
79. 47
63 34
74. OO
29. 44
46. 38
23. 2O
33. 49
60. 38
43. 14
20. 22
23. 16
63. 24
59. 91
10. 34
177. 01
CO2
387. 23
614. 45
486 29
272. 76
268. 25
382. 80
364. 86
640 01
6O2. 32
437 59
334 33
524 54
730. 05
673 94
355 43
697. 04
570. 17
631. 83
353. 99
667. 41
629. 37
804 87
641. 18
869. 71
4OO. 30
394. 05
690. 34
378. 44
332. 64
368. 73
422. 18
493. 13
472. 78
364. 70
310. 41
621 19
616. 04
587. 17
311. 59
617. 15
703. 98
729. 43
287. 06
638. 70
664. 94
513. 11
543. 40
319. 79
383. 24
437. 56
NO
3. 49
3. 69
3. 13
2. 56
2. 60
1. 53
2. 96
4. 22
2 16
1. 99
2. 76
3. 38
3. 37
3. 35
3. 61
3. 66
4. 13
2. 86
5. 15
3. 08
3 02
3. 73
3. 82
3. 34
3. 06
4 87
5. 60
4 13
1. 61
3 38
3. 84
3. 52
4. 10
1. 63
9. 06
4. 82
3. 47
3. 80
3. 97
5. 94
4. 85
4. 93
1. 79
2. 32
4. 37
3. 23
3. 91
2. 21
3. 61
1. 38
NO2
0. 84
0. 90
0. 64
0. 43
0. 37
0. 08
0. 88
1. 22
0. 39
0. 34
0. 95
0. 93
0. 85
0. 83
0. 77
0. 79
1. 02
0. 47
1. 73
1. 45
0. 30
0. 96
0. 86
0. 67
1 76
1 48
1. 83
1. 23
0. 24
0. 83
1. 09
1. 08
0. 76
0. 33
0. 06
1. 83
1. 13
1. 02
0. 96
2. 53
1. 27
1. 39
0. 23
0. 30
1. 27
1. 64
2. 93
0. 29
0. 85
0. 34
NOX
4. 33
4. 59
3. 77
2. 99
3. 17
1. 61
3. 84
3. 44
2. 55
2 33
3. 71
4. 33
4. 22
4 18
4. 38
4. 45
3. 15
3. 33
6. 88
6. S3
3. 52
4. 71
4. 68
4. 01
6. 82
6. 35
7. 43
3. 36
1. 85
4. 41
4. 93
4. 60
4. 86
2. 00
9 12
6. 63
4. 60
4. 82
4. 93
8. 49
6. 12
6. 32
2. 02
2.82
5. 64
6. 87
8. 84
2. 50
4. 4?
1. 92
NOXC
3. 96
4. 37
3. 31
2. 83
2. 93
1. 50
3. 62
5. 90
2. 31
2. 17
3. 50
4. 37
4 02
4. 44
4. 51
4. 59
5. 26
3. 35
6. 93
6. 38
4. 13
4. 42
5. 51
3. 83
6. 38
5. 98
7. 15
5. 27
1. 84
3. 93
4. 71
4. 28
4. 60
2. 07
9 89
6. 39
4. 09
4. 38
4. 26
7. 71
5. 57
5. 94
1 97
2. 43
5. 34
6. 33
8. 93
2. 35
4. "?;•
1. 69
ICO
1.60
2.60
6.20
1 .90
1 .90
2.00
10. CO
6.00
1.15
5.90
U.CO
6 .80
O.C5
0.60
0.50
n.30
5.00
C .20
0.10
1 .98
8. 10
1.25
«.55
0.50
e.c^
8.^0
1.5C
7.20
7 .70
2.2"
3.50
3.1^
3.63
9.10
1.75
10.00
tt.fiO
4. 60
7.35
0.60
2.20
2.20
3.20
6.75
0.20
8.30
fi.CO
2.20
1 "5
5.50
FUEL
ECON
20.1
13.1
12.8
27.8
28.2
16.0
16.2
11.3
12.7
18.7
18.2
13.8
11.2
12.0
23.6
11.1
12.6
13.0
23.5
12.3
11.6
10.0
12.3
9.6
18.2
18.8
12.1
14.0
9.6
14.5
18.5
14.3
16.9
14.4
16.2
11.7
12.2
12.3
24.3
12.6
11.8
11.1
22.4
12.0
12.6
15.6
11.9
20.7
14.5
12.0
-------
3-29
TABLE 13B
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
ST LOUIS
1973 TEST PROCEDURE
CAR
159
160
14,2
164
165
165R
166
166R
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
173
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
YR MAKE
72 PONT
63 FORD
72 OLDS
71 BUIC
72 CHEV
72 CHEV
70 FORD
70 FORD
70 CHEV
71 MERC
70 TOYO
71 CHEV
71 CHEV
72 FORD
71 DATS
67 FORD
66 PONT
7O FORD
70 PONT
70 BUIC
72 FORD
68 PONT
67 PONT
67 MERC
66 PLYM
72 CHEV
71 OLDS
71 PONT
67 BUIC
71 CHEV
CID
350
390
350
330
350
350
250
250
350
400
113
140
307
351
97
289
326
302
350
455
351
350
326
390
225
434
350
350
340
402
HC
4. 03
4. 36
3 30
3. 97
2. 19
1. 85
4. 01
3. 90
3. 63
8. 99
8. 70
1. 99
8. 81
2. 47
5. 73
4. 90
8. 93
3. 97
6. 85
5. 24
2. 75
3. 70
5. 84
7. 15
6. 57
2 56
3. 49
3. 87
6. 99
2. 56
CO
83 38
60. 67
35. 27
73. 51
10. 35
10. 49
55 68
54. 64
36. 94
128. 32
81 42
30 12
38. 17
28. 45
74. 42
94. 99
43. 26
23. 39
44. 57
87. 34
40. 40
46 44
67. 37
52. 20
111 19
32. 66
47. 76
77. 82
129. 24
9. 19
C02
708. 31
382. 78
692 17
692. 34
617 91
6O6. 57
402 00
408. 90
669 58
513. 31
331. 50
338. 00
362. OO
750 29
269 09
430 34
488. 76
641 12
629 23
706. 16
657. 48
644. 98
329. 37
637. 63
425. 37
751 53
563. 01
691. 31
468. 24
745. 03
NO
3. 78
6. 03
4. 24
3. 71
2 88
2 93
5 45
3. 27
2 92
3. 88
2. 68
3 94
2. 72
4, 45
2. 69
2. 20
3. 08
3. 36
3. 94
3. 08
4. 53
3. 93
4. 03
2. 78
1. 09
4 47
4. OS
3. 29
1. 36
4. 07
N02
0. 98
2. 59
1. 27
0. 97
0. 58
0. 64
2. O9
2. 06
0. 58
1. 01
0 47
1. 09
0. 53
1 38
0 37
0. 27
0. 57
0. 76
1. 14
1. 37
1 16
O. 91
1. 21
0 53
0. 06
1. 48
1. O3
1. 06
0 28
1. 52
NOX
4. 76
3. 62
5. 51
4. 68
3. 46
3. 57
7. 54
7. 33
3 50
4 39
3. 15
5. 03
3. 27
5. 83
3. 26
2 47
3. 65
4. 12
5. OS
6. 63
5. 69
4. 86
5. 26
3. 31
1. 15
3. 95
5. 08
4. 35
1. 64
5. 59
NOXC
4. 46
7. 91
5. 38
4. 60
3. 27
3. 26
6. 79
6. 45
3. 17
4. 39
2. 94
4. 75
3. 41
t>. 66
2 85
2. 96
3 22
4 O2
5. 00
6. 58
5. 72
3. 03
5. 23
3. 28
1 26
5 79
4. 80
4. 29
1 52
5 55
ICO
9.0^
3.10
2.50
0.20
•>.20
0.20
5.RO
5.8C
2.7S
1C. CO
U.25
0.20
2.80
C.20
6.UO
9.90
3.60
C .25
2.5^
6 .3<*
0.85
1.25
3. «0
3. CO
2.35
1.20
3.U5
4.50
3.90
0.20
FUEL
ECON
10.4
12.8
11.7
10.8
13.8
14.1
17.7
17.5
11.5
11.9
18.2
21.6
13.7
11.1
22.0
14.9
15.2
12.9
12.3
10.3
12.2
12.2
13.6
11.6
14.3
10.9
13.7
10.7
12.8
11.6
-------
3-30
3.3 VEHICLE EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Data for the diurnal loss and hot soak loss SHED evaporative
emissions tests are included in this section. Test fuel inspection information
for each test is also included. Reid vapor pressure (RVP) in pounds per square
inch was obtained by the ASTM D323 test, method. The ASTM D86 test method was
used to obtain the fuel distillation properties.
The following is a description of the headings used in this section.
HEADING DESCRIPTION
DIURNAL
HOT SOAK
TIME
ENC TEMP
(DIURNAL)
INT TEMP
HC/GMS
ENC TEMP
(HOT SOAK)
Diurnal breathing losses are fuel vapors emitted as a result
of an increase in fuel tank temperature in a specified time.
Hot soak losses are fuel vapor emitted during a specified
period beginning immediately after the engine is turned off
and sealed in the SHED enclosure.
The time in minutes required to heat the tank fuel 24
at a constant rate during the period of 60 minutes.
* 1°F
The enclosure interior air temperature as F, measured by a
thermocouple installed 6 inches below the geometric center of
the ceiling. The interior temperature is held between
68°F and 86°F.
The internal tank fuel temperature measured as °F by a
thermocouple installed near the geometric center of the
tank fuel liquid. This temperature is recorded as the
final maximum temperature of the tank fuel.
Calculated weight of emissions as grams. The emissions are
calculated from the net hydrocarbon concentration of the
enclosure in ppm carbon.
Same as ENC TEMP (DIURNAL) above except the interior temperature
should be held between 76°F and 90°F.
RVP
H/C
IBP
FBP
Reid Vapor Pressure, measured at 100°F - pounds per square
inch gauge.
Hydrogen - carbon atom ratio
Initial Boiling Point
Final Boiling Point
-------
EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS AND FUEL ANALYSIS
LOS ANGELES
SHED Test Procedures
CAR «
9
12
16
26
28
i
112
133
140
143
146
153
156
158
163
164
169
DIURNAL
Time
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
End
Tem]3
76.0
78.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
74.0
77,0
73.0
77.0
74.0
80.0
77.0
80.0
73.0
75.0
74.0
.Int.
Temp
84.0
84.0
85.0
84.0
84.0
83.0
84.0
84.0
84.0
84.0
84.0
84.0
83.0
84.0
83.0
85.0
HC
grams
3.08
9.79
11.54
20.40
20.33
16.83
4.91
14.24
4.62
6.75
9.74
11.50
4.08
16.65
10.84
.
37.53
HOT SOAK
Time
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Encl.
Temp.
90.0
79.0
84.0
86.0
88.0
86.3
83.0
87.0
84.0
85.0
90.0
88.0
89.0
88.0
77.0
87.0
Int.
Temp.
102.0
86.0
94.0
87.0
94.0
94.1
95.0
100.0
88.0
97.0
94.0
93.0
99.0
99.0
80.0
99.0
HC
jrams
19.36
5.29
7.15
14.30
20.11
7.69
14.41
15.47
8.58
7.52
15.86
16.99
7.76
13.56
2.49
22.16
RVP
8.1
8.3
9.8
9.7
9.6
8.2
8.1
9.1
9.1
8.2
9.0
9.0
8.8
8.8
8.5
8.2
H/C
2.544
2.506
2.45
2.45
2.45
2.486
2.516
2.453
2.489
2.480
2.470
2.470
2.469
2.469
2.457
2.462
IBP
94
93
91
87
90
94
93
91
92
94
93
93
93
93
94
93
5%
113
115
105
103
108
115
115
113
114
114
114
114
113
113
116
112
10%
130
128
120
116
124
134
128
131
133
128
132
132
133
133
134
130
15%
144
140
135
127
138
149
138
147
149
143
147
147
144
144
150
145
20%
157
154
147
138
150
163
149
163
166
156
163
163
164
164
163
160
30%
186
186
174
166
175
189
178
191
193
186
191
191
192
192
190
184
40%
208
208
199
195
200
210
206
209
211
208
209
209
211
211
212
204
50%
222
222
218
214
222
229
223
224
225
222
224
224
227
227
232
219
90%
309
310
303
307
308
313
305
315
316
309
317
317
317
317
315
303
FBP
350
354
346
344
340
364
354
364
365
355
366
366
370
370
363
354
TABLE 14
-------
EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS AND FUEL ANALYSIS
LOS ANGELES
SHED Test Procedures
CAR #
169R
.170
170R
':172
.178:
i
179' '
. DIURNAL
Time
60
60
•60 ;
-60
60 .
60
Encl.
Temp.
73.0
73.0
76.0
75.0
78.0
77.0
—
Int.
Temp.
.84.1
83.0
84.0
84.0
84,0
83.5.
HC
grams
16.81
12.94
12.37
6.45
12.15
7.09
'
!
HOT SOAK
Time
.60
60
.60
'60
60
60 .
Encl.
Temp_.
90.0
82.0
82.0
84.0
90.0
88.0
Int.
Temp.
103/0
93.0
93.0
92.0
102,0
96.0
HC
grams
13.00
6.78
5.79
5.48
8.78
21.18
RVP
8.7
8.3
8.1
8.3
8.6
' 8.5 •
H/C
2.47<
2.46!
2.47:
2.47C
2.47C
.2.54'
IBP
90
94 -
94
94
90
91
5%
112
115
114
113
113
110
10%
132
132
131
131
131
'129
15%
149
145
145.
146
146
145
20%
164
160
158
160
159
160
30%
190
188
186
190
183
•185
40%
212
.206
207
210
205
206
50%
227
;220
22-4
229
220
221
90%
315
312
307
305
299
309
-
FBP
361
358
358
360
360
360
TABLE 14 (cont.)
------- |