APTD-1506
A STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM 1966-1972
LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES
IN WASHINGTON, D. C.
SECOND EDITION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
-------
APTD-1506
A STUDY OF EMISS:
IN WASHINGTON, D. C,
Prepared by
A. R. Martin and R. A. Herrick
General Environments Corporation
6840 Industrial Road
Springfield, Virginia 22151
Contract Number 68-01-0454
EPA Project Officer: John T. White III
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Water Programs
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
January 1974
-------
This report is issued by the Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control,
Office of Air and Water Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, to
report technical data of interest to a limited number of readers . Copies
of this report are available free of charge to Federal employees, current
contractors and grantees, and non-profit organizations - as supplies
permit - from the Air Pollution Technical Information Center, Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711,
or may be obtained, for a nominal cost, from the National Technical
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22151.
This report was furnished to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
by General Environments Corporation in fulfillment of Contract Number
68-01-0454. The opinions, findings , and conclusions expressed are
those of'th'e author arid not necessarily those of the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. ' Mention of company or product names is not to be
considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication Number APTD-1506
11
-------
ABSTRACT
General Environments Corporation (GEC) of Springfield, Virginia
was selected to participate in the 1972 Emission Factors Program (Six
Cities Program) by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). One hundred
and seventy privately owned passenger vehicles from the Metropolitan Washington,
D.C. area were tested for exhaust emission levels of carbon monoxide, carbon
dioxide, hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen according to the 1975 Federal
Test Procedure. Testing of vehicles included both cold and hot start cycles.
The test results were then used to calculate emission factors based on both
the 1972 and 1975 Federal Test Procedures.
111
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Test Program 2
2.1 Program Objectives ' 2
2.2 Program Design 2
2.2.1 Pretest Phase 3
2.2.2 Test Phase 3
2.2.3 Data Acquisition, Processing, and Submission 3
2,3 Test Vehicle Procurement 4
2.3.1 Selection Procedure 4
2.3.2 Test Vehicle Handling 10
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Procurement 12
2.4 Facilities and Equipment 15
2.4.1 Test Location 15
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler 15
2.4.3 Exhaust Analysis Console 17
2.4.4 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases 20
2.4.5 Chassis Dynamometer 24
2.4.6 Miscellaneous Equipment 24
2.5 Equipment Qualification, Calibration, and Cross Check 26
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler (CVS) 26
2.5.2 Exhaust Analysis Console 27
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer 29
2.6 Test Procedures 30
2.6.1 Vehicle and Equipment Preparation 30
2.6.2 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure 32
2.6.3 Daily Test Schedule 34
2.7 Data Handling 36
2.7.1 Data Collection 36
2.7.2 Data Processing 36
APPENDIX I - Test Fuel Analysis kQ
APPENDIX II - Test Results Tables 1+
iv
-------
GENERAL ENVIRONMENTS CORPORATION
SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
General Environments Corporation (GEC), of Springfield, Virginia,
formerly called General Testing Laboratories, was awarded a contract by the
Environmental Protection Agency for conducting "A Study of Emissions from
1966-1972 Light-Duty Vehicles in Washington, D.C." The contractual date was
7 September 1972.
One hundred eighty tests were conducted on one hundred seventy vehicles
using the 1975 Federal Test Procedure over a six week period.
Punched computer cards have been provided to EPA for grams of pollutant
per test vehicle per test cycle and the final gm/mile results have been cal-
culated according to the 1972 and 1975 Federal Test Procedures.
-------
2.0 TEST PROGRAM
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
The objective of this program was to provide the Environmental
Protection Agency with data on emissions of 1966-1972 model year vehicles
representative of the nationwide vehicle population.
Information has previously, through a prior year contract, been
acquired for 1957-1971 model year vehicles. This is the first information
available for 1972 model year vehicles, and updates the emission data
for prior model year vehicles.
The vehicles were tested in an as-received condition, thus the
reported emissions can be considered representative of the actual emissions
generated by these makes/models/engine types in this metropolitan area.
Similar contracts were performed in Washington, D.C,; Houston,
Texas; Los Angeles, California; Denver, Colorado; Chicago, Illinois, and
St. Louis, Missouri to provide the same information.
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN
Individual exhaust emission tests were conducted on 170 light-duty
vehicles from model years 1966-1972, Each vehicle was operated on a
chassis dynamometer through the EPA urban driving cycle from both a cold
start and a hot start. In addition, ten vehicles were retested to provide
replicate data to be used to determine the test to test reproducibility
on the same car.
The exhaust emissions from each vehicle were measured during
the transient and stabilized portions of both the cold and hot start
runs. The emission rates of total hydrocarbons, nitric oxide, total
nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide were determined.
In addition, undiluted CO concentration in raw tailpipe exhaust was
measured while the vehicle was idling.
-------
The data obtained allow computation of gin/mile emission rates
for hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, total oxides of nitrogen and carbon
dioxide in accordance with the 1972 and 1975 Federal Test Procedures.
2.2.1 Pretest Phase
EPA certification of equipment, procedures and personnel was
completed prior to commencement of test scheduling. Concurrently
test vehicles were located.
2.2.2 Test Phase
Vehicles were scheduled for test on a daily basis and after
receipt of a test car the vehicle was inspected and prepared for test.
A 12 hour temperature soak permitted the vehicle to attain the tempera-
ture required by the Federal Test Procedure. Both cold start and hot
start exhaust emission tests were conducted on all vehicles in general
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Register and the contract
scope of work.
2.2.3 Data Acquisition, Processing, and Submission
Test data was processed as acquired by both manual and computer
methods. Each vehicle data set was maintained separately and identified
by a vehicle number and a run number.
A computer program was constructed to perform the required
emission calculations and to provide punched cards for submission to EPA.
Additional programs were developed to perform the 1972 calculations, the
1975 calculations, and the calculations required for preparation of
the tables required in the final report.
-------
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
The test program required the testing of 170 cars of the years
1966-1972 and the retesting of a select number of cars for each model
year.
2.3.1 Selection Procedure
Guidelines for the selection of test vehicles were provided in
the contract and are reproduced in the following table (Table No. 1).
The sample sizes are based on vehicle miles traveled for each model year's
vehicles.
TABLE I
NUMBER OF VEHICLES TO BE TESTED IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
Vehicle Model Year Sample Size/Model Year
1972 35
1971 30
1970 27
1969 22
1968 21
1967 18
1966 17
All 170
The Environmental Protection Agency provided a list of specific
cars to be tested. R.L. Polk £ Co., Marketing Service Division, provided
mailing labels (Exhibit A) for the desired vehicle types (See Table 2).
Several mailings (Exhibits B, C § D) were conducted using these labels.
A program of newspaper ads and personal contact was instituted to fill the
differences between the set of mailing labels and the EPA requirements.
-------
70FLN 8
MS CLAIRE C S1ZER
Id29 WYOMING AV NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
72FLN 6
MR PHILLIP c HtlKKlS
1475 EUCLID ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
67FLN 8
MR JAMES H WltRZbA
1601 13TH ST Nw
WASHlriGTQN DC 20009
66FOR 8
MR MARSHALL LOGAN
1853 VERNON ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 200 J9
67FO* 8
MR JAMES S
1325 RIGGS
WASHINGTON
ALLEN
ST NW
DC 20009
66FOR 8
MR WILLIAM PALMER
1518 SWANN ST NW
WASHINGTON OC 20009
720LD 8
MS VIRGINIA J WYATT
2701 14TH ST NW
WASHINGTON OC 20009
660LD d
MS EMMA J ROBINSON
2113 12TH ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
66PLY 6
MR BR1NOLEY 8 PIETERS
2t01 ONTARIO RD NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
67MUS 8
MS DORIS E SMITH
1910 KALOKAMA RD NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
68MUS 8
MR MICHAEL D WEBB
1616 18TH ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
67MUS 8
MR ALI R SHAJARIAN
1921 19TH ST NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
66MUS 8
MR JOSE L CHAVEZ
1801 CLYDESDALE NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
700LD 8
MR PHILIP F JOHNSON
1714 SUMMIT PL NW
WASHINGTON DC 20009
72PIN *
MR CLARENCE E
2342 15TH ST
WASHINGTON DC
BEVERLY JR
200C9
72PON 8
MR HEReEKT S MAtfKlNS
1350 CLIFTON ST NW
WASHINGTON OC ^0009
EXHIBIT A
S
-------
TABLE 2
QUANTITY OF LABEL LISTINGS BY MODEL YEAR
No. of Cylinders 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
Cadillac
Oldsmobile
Buick
Pontiac
Mercury
Lincoln
Chrysler
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Ford
Volkswagen
Datsun
Mercedes Benz
Toyota
Plymouth
Plymouth
AMC
AMC
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
4
8
6
4
4
4
8
4
8
6
8
6
200
200
None
200
None
None
200
200
200
None
200
200
None
200
None
None
None
200
200
None
None
200
200
200
200
200
None
200
200
200
None
200
200
None
200
None
None
None
200
None
None
200
150
150
150
150
150
None
150
150
150
None
150
150
None
150
None
None
None
150
150
None
150
150
150
150
150
150
None
150
150
150
None
150
150
None
150
None
None
None
150 .
150
150
150
100
100
100
100
None
100
100
100
100
None
100
100
None
100
100
None
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
None
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
-------
General Testing Laboratories, Inc. / 6840 Industrial Road, Springfield, Virginia 22151 / (703) 354-2000
Form No. 4505-1 Form Approved
Office of Management
f, Budget No. 158-S-72033
Dear Vehicle Owner:
You may be able to make an important contribution towards
controlling the nation's air pollution problem, and receive a
$25 U.S. Savings Bond for your cooperation.
As you may know, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
is conducting an important testing program for vehicle exhaust
pollution in six major metropolitan areas: Chicago, St. Louis,
Denver, Los Angeles, Houston, and Washington, D.C. Our organization
has been selected by the Government to perform these tests in this area.
We are writing you because your vehicle has been randomly selected as
a candidate for testing.
Enclosed is a postpaid card which you should complete and return
at your earliest convenience. Printed on the card is the model year
and make of a vehicle registered in your name. Please indicate if
you still own this vehicle, and if you are willing to submit it to
our laboratory where it will be tested under simulated normal driving
conditions. No unusual operations will be performed and no adjustments
will be made to your vehicle. It will be fully insured while in our
possession.
We have been authorized by the Environmental Protection Agency
to award a $25 U.S. Savings Bond to each participant whose vehicle
is tested. Also, if you wish, we will provide you, free of charge,
a late-model, fully-insured rental car for your use during the time
your vehicle is being tested.
We know you will want to be a part of this important project.
Please complete and return the enclosed postage-paid postcard today.
We will contact you shortly to schedule the test.
Sincerely yours,
GENERAL TESTING LABORATORIES DIVISION
General Environments Corporation
R. G. Kolb
EXHIBIT B
7
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
December 15, 1972
A Message to the Vehicle Owner
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in carrying out the
Clean Air Act, has contracted with competent testing organizations to
conduct emission tests on certain randomly-selected 1966-1972 model
vehicles. The purpose of these tests is to develop emission factors
for use in making nationwide emission estimates. The test results from
any individual vehicle will be used only by the EPA in comparison with
the test results from all similar vehicles. The outcome of the test on
any individual vehicle cannot result in any enforcement action against
the vehicle owner.
The enclosed letter to you, from one of these testing organizations,
explains this project in detail, and it asks to test your vehicle. The
purpose of this message is to urge that if at all possible, you allow
your vehicle to be tested in this program.
To assure valid results from this program, the specific vehicles
that will comprise the sample to be tested are randomly selected in
proportion to a nationwide vehicle population average, without bias,
from vehicle registration lists provided by private research firms.
Your vehicle has been tentatively selected by means of this process.
Your participation in the test will represent a real and significant
contribution to the cause of clean air.
Please read the enclosed letter. You will note that it says a
follow-up will be made. Should you have an unlisted telephone number,
or if for any other reason it may be difficult for the testing
organization to reach you by phone, please call the number given in the
enclosed letter to arrange for your participation.
Sincerely yours,
Eric 0. Stork
Director
Mobile Source Pollution Control Program
Enclosure
EXHIBIT C
8
-------
Form No. 4505-2 Form Approved
Office of Management
5 Budget No. 158-S-72033
Vehicle registration lists show that the motor vehicle shown
below is registered in your name:
If Incorrect,
Please Correct
Do you still own this vehicle? Yes I T No I T
If yes, will you be willing to allow us to conduct pollution
tests on this vehicle? Yes , r No • ,
If yes, please indicate a telephone number where we can reach
you to make arrangements.
Phone: Best Time to Call:
EXHIBIT D
-------
Once the original contact was made, a file was kept by year and
make. Information was obtained from the car owners concerning engine
size, transmission and carburetor Venturis. If the car fit the set of
cars needed, the owner was contacted at a later date when an appointment
time was set.
Once a car arrived at the laboratory, a preliminary inspection
was conducted which consisted of an inspection to determine if there
were obvious problems with the exhaust or emission control systems and
the vehicle had the proper engine, transmission, and carburetor combination,
Included in this inspection was general mechanical condition of the vehicle
as well as driveability and safety of operation,
Any replacements to be made due to aborted tests or non-compliance
with the test requirements were contacted from a reserve file.
2.3.2 Test Vehicle Handling
After the preliminary inspection was conductedj an exchange
of cars and receipts took place. The car owner received a courtesy car
with a full tank of gas and after the test a $25.00 savings bond and an
Environmental Protection Agency certificate of appreciation (Exhibit E),
The test vehicle was driven to the defueling area and the gas tank
emptied. The gasoline was deposited into a 55 gallon drum.. The
specified volume of test fuel was pumped into the car^s gas. tank.
A 10 minute course was set up through the industrial park where
GEC is located and each car was driven over this course before
being placed in the laboratory. The cars were driven into the laboratory
and parked. At this point the date and time was posted on each car'\s
windshield. The owner's drive to the laboratory and the 10 minute
purge run constituted the vehicle preconditioning^
10
-------
w
H
H
PARTI
ESTING
UTION » AD
UIFICANT> .
OL OF M®IOR
PRES
Eric O. Stork, Director
Mobile Source Pollution Control Program
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
The car was hand pushed within the laboratory at all times
and included hand pushing onto the dynamometer to start the test.
The fuel used in all tests was Texaco Indolene 30 test fuel.
A certified analysis of the test fuel is included as Appendix I of
this report.
A final inspection was performed after the car was situated on
the dynamometer before the actual test was begun. It was determined
that the emission controls were connected and that the engine had not
been modified extensively. This ensured vehicles which were representative
of the vehicle population. The technician attached the sampling boot
to the exhaust system.
After the test was completed, the ignition timing, idle speed and
dwell were measured and recorded. The percent of carbon monoxide in the
exhaust was measured and recorded while the engine was idling.
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Procurement
Test vehicle procurement was based on the EPA vehicle mix
referred to in Section 2.3.1 of this report. The proper vehicle mix
was sought through the use of mailing labels, newspaper ads, radio
ads, and flyers. A very minor number of test vehicles were received
from civic or fraternal organizations. Several vehicles were obtained
through local college groups. There were no rental vehicles used in
this program. A listing of the EPA proposed test cars and the test cars
substituted by GEC is provided in Table 3. Only those vehicles in the
columns marked "Actual" were substituted for the adjacent vehicle in the
proposed column. Those vehicles listed only in the "Proposed'1 column
were tested as described.
12
-------
1972 EMISSION FACTORS PROGRAM
TEST SITE: WASHINGTON, D. C. CONTRACTOR: GENERAL ENVIRONMENTS CORPORATION
MAKE
American Motors
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Dodge
Ford
Lincoln
Mercury
Opel
Oldsmobile
(*) Replicates
iTALS 1972
5
12
4
39
4
10
35
1
7
1
11
Proposed
6-258A1
8-350A2
8-455A4
8-455A4
8-472A4
4-140A2
8-307A2
8-350M2
8-350A2
8-350 A2
8-350A4
8-40.0A2
8-454A4
8-400A2
6-225A1
8-360A2
4-122M2
8-302A2
8-302A2
8-351A2(*;
8-351A2
8-400 A2
8-429A4
8-400A2
8-350A2
8-455A4
Actual
4-140M2
8-350A2
8-350A2
8-350A2
8-402A4
8-440A4
4-122A2
8-400A2
8-351A2
8-455M4
1971 1970
Proposed
8-350A2
8-455A4
4-140M1
8-307A2
8-350A2
8-350 A2
8-350A4
8-400A2
8-402A4
6-225M1
8-383A2
4-97. 6M1
6-200A1
8-302A2
8-351A2
8-351A2
8-429A4
8-460A4
8-351A2
4-116M2
8-350A2
8-455A4
Actual Proposed
8-304A2
8-350A2
8-455A4
6-250A1
8-307A2(*)
8-350 A2
8-350A2
8-350A2 8-400A2
8-350A2 .
8-440A4
6-225A1 8-318A2
8-383A2
6-200M1
6-250A1
6-250A1 8-302A2
8-302A2
8-351A2
8-400A4 8-351A2
8-351A4 8-429A2
8-350A2
8-455A4
1969
Actual Proposed Actual
8-350A4 8-350A2
8-430A4
8-472A4
6-230M1
8-307A2(*)
8-307A2
8-350A2 8-350A4
8-350A4
8-383A2
8-383A4(*)
6-200A1 6-200M1
6-200M1 8-302A2
8-302A2
8-351A2
8-390A4 8-390A2
8-351A4 8-390A2
8-350A4 8-350A2
8-45SA4 8-455A2
1968
Proposed
8-290A2
8-430A4
8-472A4(*;
6-164M2
8-307A2 .
8-307A2
8-327A4
8-396A4
8-383A2
8-318A2
6-200M1
8-289A2
8-289A2
8-390A2
8-428A4
8-302A2
8-350A2
Actual
6-232A1
8-400A4
)
6-250A1
6-240A2
8-390A4
8-350A4
1967 1966
Proposed Actual Proposed Actual
6-232A2 8-343A2 6-232M1 6-232A1
8-300A2 8-340A2
8-429A4
6-230M1 6-250M1 6-194A1 6-194M1
8-283A2 8-283M2 8-283M2
8-283A2 8-283A2(*)
8-283A2(*) 8-283A2
8-327A4
8-383A2 8-383A4
6-225A1 8-318A2 8-383A2
8-289A2 6-200M1 6-200A1
8-289M2 8-289A2 8-289A2
8-390A2 8-390A2
8-390A2
8-330A2
8-390A2 8-390M2
8-330A2
TABLE 3 (continued on next page)
-------
MAKE
TOTALS 1972
Proposed Actual
1971
Proposed Actual
1970
Proposed Actual
1969
Proposed Actual
1968
Proposed Actual
1967
Proposed Actual
Plymouth '
Pontiac
Volkswagen
Datsun
Toyota
TOTALS
12
14
10
2
3
170
8-360A2
8-318A2(*)
8-340A4 8-318A2
8-350A2
8-400A2
4-103AO
4-96. 6M1
4-97. 4M2 4-97. 4A2
4-120M2 4-120M1
35
6-198A1 6-225A1
8r318A2(*)
8-350A2 8-400A2
8-455A2 8-400A2(*
4-96. 6M1
4-96. 6M1
4-97. 4M2
4-71M1
30
6-225M1
8-318A2
8-350A2
)8-400A2
4-96. 6M1
4-96.6M1
4-71M1
27
6-225A1 6-225A1
8-318A2
8-350A2
8-400A2
4-96.6A1 4-91M1
8-273M2 8-318A2 8-318A2
8-383A2
4-71A1
22
8-350A2
8-400A2
4-91M1
8-326A2
8-400M2 8-400A2
'4-91M1
21
18
1966
Proposed Actual
6-225M1 6-225A1
8-326A2
8-389A2
4-78M1
8-389A4
17
(*) Replicates
TABLE 3
-------
Approximately 15 percent of the selected test vehicles were
rejected upon arrival at the laboratory due to the failure of the vehicle
to meet the test specifications for engine cylinders, cubic inch
displacement, and/or number of carburetor Venturis, This necessitated
overscheduling to meet the daily test schedule. Over the entire test
period about 10 percent of the selected test vehicles failed to show up
for testing.
2.4 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
2.4.1 Test Location
All testing covered by this report was conducted at the Washington
Laboratories of General Environments Corporation located at 6840 Industrial
Road, Springfield, Virginia. This facility is located about nine miles
south of the city limits of Washington, D.C. Geographically the Washington,
D.C. area has a maximum elevation of 400 feet above sea level. The
average summer temperature is about 75 degrees Fahrenheit and winter
temperatures average about 35 degrees Fahrenheit.
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler
The constant volume sampler employed in the performance of this
contract was the Scott Constant Mass Flow Exhaust Sampler, Model 301
(Figure 1). The Model 301 was designed to collect and condition all of
the raw exhaust gases from a passenger vehicle operated over the Federal
Exhaust Emission Test Cycle and to retain a representative sample of
those gases for subsequent analysis applicable to mass emission calcula-
tions .
15
-------
FIGURE(1) SCOTT CONSTANT MASS FLOW
EXHAUST SAMPLER, MODEL 301
-------
The constant volume sampler (CVS) was modified in the following
areas to meet the test requirements specified in the scope of work.
a. The CVS was not equipped with a temperature recorder for
providing a graphic recording of the pump mass flow
temperature or ambient air temperature. A 12-channel
Honeywell Temperature Recorder Model 153X12^.P-X was employed
to alternately monitor the pump mass flow temperature and
ambient air temperature at fifteen second intervals. The
accuracy of the recorder was +_ 1°F.
b. A mercury manometer was installed at the mass pump to
monitor the pressure change across the mass pump as required
in 35 Federal Register 219, paragraph 85.81.
c. A 1/4 inch teflon tube was installed between the CVS and the
exhaust analysis console to permit rapid transfer of sample and
airbag contents for analysis,
d. A five (5) gallon accumulator and valve orifice (Figure 2) was
installed at the CVS to dampen the pulsations of the water
manometer monitoring the mass pump input pressure.
2.4.3 Exhaust Analysis Console
A Scott Research Exhaust Analysis Console (EAC) Model 119 (Figure 3)
was employed to analyze automotive exhaust gas samples collected by the CVS.
The EAC consists of a cabinet approximately 71" x 64" x 30" housing two non-
dispersive infrared analyzers (NDIR) for measurement of carbon monoxide
(CO) and carbon dioxide (CCO . In addition there are two Scott dual
17
-------
AIR FLOW
oo
PUMP
f
VALVE ORIFICE
i
X1
\
ACCUMULATOR
INLET
MANOMETER
PUMP
DIFFERENTIAL
MANOMETER
FIGURE (2) CVS ACCUMULATOR INSTALLATION
-------
FIGURE(3) SCOTT EXHAUST ANALYSIS CONSOLE
MODEL 119
-------
pen recorders, a Scott dryer/scrubber, a bubbler and a cut out for a
CVS remote panel.
In-house hydrocarbon (THC) and NO/NOX analyzers were used in
the performance of the test program.
The hydrocarbon analyzer (Figure 4) was a Beckman Model 400
which utilizes the flame ionization method of detection.
The NO/NOX analyzer was of the chemiluminescent type manufactured
by Thermo-Electron Incorporated of Waltham, Massachusetts (Figure 5).
2.4.4 Laboratory Standard Calibration Gases
Calibration gases were procured from Scott Research and forwarded
to the Environmental Protection Agency for concentration certification
prior to commencement of the test phase of the program, The following
gas mixtures were obtained at levels of approximately 10, 25, 40, 50, 60,
70, 85, and 100 percent of scale for each expected range; Hydrocarbon
(Propane) in Air, Carbon Monoxide in Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide in Nitrogen,
Nitric Oxide in Nitrogen.
Zero grade air or zero grade nitrogen was employed for instrument
zeroing and was reported to contain not more than 0.1 ppm total hydrocarbons
and less than 10 ppm carbon monoxide.
After testing by EPA the gases were forwarded to GEC and upon
receipt were logged in the master gas cylinder log as Gold Standard
gases for calibration of instruments. Each bottle was provided with
a gold cylinder cap to ensure easy identification.
Upon completion of instrument calibrations, a series of gas mixtures
obtained from Scott were analyzed at GEC and the actual concentrations
determined by comparing instrument response to indicated value on the
calibration curve. These gases were labeled as working gases and entered
in the master gas cylinder log.
20
-------
The following table is a listing of the gases used for
instrument spanning during the test program.
Instrument Concentration
CO 4.56% in
CO 0.50% in N2
CO 0.2909% in N
CO 1.65% in N2
C02 2.474% in N
C02 1.001% in N
NOX 212 ppm in N2
FID 144 ppm in air
FID 272 ppm in air
FID 1513 ppm in air
FID 879 ppm in air
FID 2115 ppm in air
FID 2646 ppm in air
21
-------
*> *° 1° 6P
oO \ • ' >
RANGE MULTTPUER
MODE . 4OO HYDROCARBON ANALYZER
< ,
•'':•• * • • •••
FIGURE (4) BECKMAN MODEL 400 HYDROCARBON
ANALYZER
-------
CHEMH.UMINESCEN1
NO ANALYZER
-------
2.4.5 Chassis Dynamometer
A Model ECE-50-0 Emission Dynamometer with belt driven drive
variable inertia flywheel (Figure 6) was purchased from the Clayton
Manufacturing Company of El Monte, California.
The ECE-50 dynamometer consists of
(1) a roll and frame section which provides a "treadmill" to
support and transmit power from the drive wheels of the
vehicle under test,
(2) a power absorption unit which provides the method and
controls to absorb engine horsepower consistent with that
required to operate the vehicle on the highway,
(3) a variable inertia flywheel assembly which provides a means
of dynamically simulating the mass weight of the vehicle
being tested,
(4) ramps to position the vehicle in a level position,
(5) and read-out instrumentation (speedmeter and road load
horsepower meter) which provides a reference between
dynamometer operation and road simulation.
2.4.6 Miscellaneous Equipment
A Mettler analytical balance, Model H315 was used to weigh propane
cylinders used during propane recovery tests of the CVS. The balance
accuracy was 0.1 milligram and the range 0-1000 grams.
A Varian Associates Model G-1000 Time/Speed Recorder was employed
to provide a graphic record of the simulated vehicle speed versus the
prescribed driving course. Prior to implementing the test schedule the
chart speed of the driver's aide was determined several times. The chart
speed was determined to be within the + 2 second tolerance.
24
-------
FIGURE (6)
CLAYTON DYNAMOMETER
MODEL ECE-50-0
-------
A Penske timing light model 244.2115 was employed to determine test
vehicle engine timing. A Snap-on Model MT416 primary tach dwell meter was
.used to measure point dwell and idle r.p.m.
Additonal items of equipment included a cooling fan to move air
through the test vehicle radiator, front wheel restraining blocks, vehicle
restraining cables, tire pressure gage (0-50 psi) and miscellaneous tools.
A Meriam Laminar Flow Element (LFE) Model 50MC2-6SF with a range
of 0-1000 SCFM was employed to calibrate the constant volume sampler mass
airflow. The LFE was employed with a Model 310EF10 inlet absolute pressure
gage and a Model 40HE35 differential pressure indicator.
A standard mercurial barometer was used to determine local atmos-
pheric pressure.
A Brown-Honeywell 12-channel temperature recorder was employed to
monitor and record soak area temperature at 30 second intervals.
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, CALIBRATION, AND CROSS CHECK
Instrumentation was selected for the conduct of the test phase
according to the guidelines provided in 35 Federal Register 219 Part II,
36 Federal Register 128, and the basic contract scope of work.
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler (CVS)
The constant volume sampler mass airflow was determined by means
of a Meriam Laminar Flow element at 10 increments of flow. Incremental
flow changes were effected by means of a valve situated between the laminar
flow element and the CVS. The differential pressure across the mass pump
was recorded for each increment of flow. The standard volume per
revolution of the pump was calculated and plotted against the differential
pressure.
26
-------
The CVS was calibrated by injecting known amounts of propane into
the CVS and caluclating the propane recovery based on the total air volume
moved by the CVS. Consistent readings within the range of -^2.0 percent
were obtained. A typical propane recovery calculation is presented in
Exhibit F.
2.5.2 Exhaust Analysis Console
The exhaust analysis console consists of the following subsystems -
sampling pumps, valves and flowmeters, analyzers, and recorders. Each
system is briefly discussed in the following paragraphs. The sample
handling system includes stainless steel bellows pumps for moving the
sample from the CVS to the various analytical instruments. All piping,
valves, fittings, and sample lines were of stainless steel or teflon.
Daily leak checks of the sampling system were conducted by placing all
instruments in the sample mode and sealing the inlet of the sample line.
This resulted in a zero flow indication on all instrument flowmeters.
Sample bags were checked for leaks by sampling an evacuated bag to ensure
a zero flow existed.
2.5.2.1 Analytical Instrumentation
The calibration of the analytical instrumentation consisted
of establishing the manufacturers'^ operational parameters and then
introducing gold standard gases to determine instrument response. The
following ranges were established.
Carbon Monoxide 0-0.3 percent
0-3 percent
0-10 percent
Carbon Dioxide 0-4 percent
Total Hydrocarbons 0-300 ppm carbon
0-3000 ppm carbon
Or-30,000 ppm carbon
Nitrogen Oxides 0-250 ppm NOX
0-1000 ppm NOX
27
-------
EPA Propan^ Injection Calculation Sheet
'nix ' *i * V0 x N x
w
oo H3
•it
V IB v V
mix .6947368 * vo
x N
HC
HC » V x 17.3 x conc
mass mix 1,000,000
HC
mass
17.3 X
Bar
in^G.x 25.4 » mmHG ^7 S 3-//00
Inlet Dep. » inft 0 x 1.868
P .» Bar • inlet dep.
mmHG
T ;» 460 '•+ temp, of exhaust gas
Cyl Wt. Before
Cyl Wt. After
A Wt.
Calc. Wt.
% Diff.
t >
I/
-------
Weekly three point analytical checks were conducted to ensure
analytical consistency.
The calibration curves were reconstructed each month to verify
instrument response.
Two dual pen strip chart recorders complete the sample
analytical system. One recorder monitored the output from the CO
and CO., analyzer while the other monitored hydrocarbon and NO/NOX.
Each channel of the recorders provided a full scale deflection with
10 millivolts of input signal.
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer
The chassis dynamometer met the specifications contained in 35
Federal Register 219, Part II, 36 Federal Register 128 and the contract
scope of work. The dynamometer was calibrated both for speed and road
load horsepower.
Speedometer calibration was accomplished by accelerating the
dynamometer to 46.5 miles per hour and measuring roller revolutions
with a strobotach. At 46.5 miles per hour the roller rpm was 1800 as
specified by the manufacturer.
Rated load horsepower (RLHP) calibration consisted of warming
the dynamometer for 15 minutes at 30 mph with a non-test vehicle. This
vehicle was then employed to accelerate the dynamometer rollers to 50 mph.
This indicated road load horsepower at 50 mph was recorded. The vehicle
then accelerated to an indicated 60 mph and the drive wheels physically
lifted from the rollers with a forklift truck. The coast time from 55
to 45 mph was determined by means of a 5th wheel and stop-clock. Triplicate
\
runs were conducted for several points over the working rangev The following
calculation was employed to determine the actual road load horsepower:
29
-------
HPd = (1/2) (Wj/82.2) (vj - V^/SSOt) or:
W
HP, = 0.06073
, — \s • w vx f •»? ^ j
where:
W, = Equivalent inertia in pounds
V^ = Initial velocity in ft/sec
(55 mph = 80.67 ft/sec)
\2 = Final velocity in ft/sec
(45 mph = 66 ft/sec)
t = Elapsed time for rolls to coast
from 55 mph to 45 mph
35 Federal Register 219 Appendix B
A plot of the indicated RLHP versus the actual RLHP is presented
in Figure 7. This plot was translated to a table and posted near the speed-
meter and road load horsepower meter to provide a quick reference for the
test crew.
2.6 TEST PROCEDURES
2.6.1 Vehicle and Equipment Preparation
2.6.1.1 Vehicle Preparation
Upon arrival at the laboratory each vehicle was carefully inspected
for exhaust system continuity, engine size, number of carburetor Venturis,
completeness, condition of existing emission control systems, and drive-
ability. Each item was checked on a list as completed. The vehicle
was then moved to the defueI/fuel area and the contents of the gas tank
emptied into a drum by means of a high capacity fuel pump, Test fuel
was then introduced to a level of 40 percent of tank capacity. Pumping
time was calculated by the following equation:
30
-------
16 i-
O-)
Ci
UJ
•>
O
a.
UJ
Q
< 3C
S a
Q O
< LO
c
Q
UJ
<
u
HH
g
12
_L
1
8 12 16
ROAD LOAD HORSEPOWER @ 50 MPH
20
FIGURE (7) ROAD LOAD HORSEPOWER CALIRRATION
-------
r,,- T [0-4] [Tank Capacity]
Pump time [Mm] = Pump rate in gallons per minute
Upon completion of the fueling each vehicle was driven over a prescribed
10 minute course to remove residual non-test fuel from the fuel lines,
fuel pump, and carburetor. This run to the laboratory and the ten minute
course comprised the initial vehicle preparation.
The vehicles were placed inside the laboratory with the time
and data recorded for the start of the temperature soak period. After
12 hours the vehicle was pushed onto the dynamometer by hand. Just prior
to test each vehicle was reinspected to ensure that no change had occurred
since the initial inspection. Tires were inflated to 45 pounds per square
inch, the cooling fan positioned and turned on, the hood opened, the tail
pipe connector attached, and the driver's aide placed in the car.
2.6.1.2 Equipment Preparation
The dynamometer was warmed up prior to each day^s testing. The
CVS was turned on at 300 CFM for a minimum of 20 minutes prior to use and
the analytical instrumentation was turned on for at least 30 minutes prior
to system leak checks and prior to conducting the daily propane recovery
test. Flow rates were established for each instrument and zero gas response
verified. Prior to introducing test samples all instruments were zeroed and
spanned to ensure accurate sample response.
2.6.2 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure
The test procedures employed were as detailed in 35 Federal Register
219, Part II of November 10, 1970 as amended by 36 Federal Register 55 and
36 Federal Register 128, and as modified by the contract scope of work.
32
-------
2.6.2.1 Pretest Procedures
The analytical instruments were turned onto the range to be
used and allowed to warm up. The analyzers were zeroed with zero grade
air and then spanned to adjust the attenuation of each instrument to
the desired range. The values were then compared to previous readings and
adjusted if required to within one percent of span. The NOX to NO converter
was checked for efficiency by preparing a gas bag of nitric oxide and
oxygen. The bag was mixed and connected to the sample inlet of the NO/NOX
analyzer. Alternately the NO and NOX values were read at one minute intervals
for a period of 12-15 minutes, Routinely the NOX value remained constant
while the NO value reduced with time.
A propane recovery test was conducted daily prior to starting
the vehicle tests. The propane recovery test consisted of injecting known
amounts of propane in the sample inlet of the CVS over a 15 minute period
and collecting an aliquot of the diluted sample in a plastic (Tedlar) bag.
Subsequent analysis of the diluted propane from the sample bag and a paral-
lel sample from the air bag provided a means of calculating the recovery
percent for the sampling system. A recovery of ^2.0 percent of propane
injected was experienced during the test phase of the program. This was ,
sufficient to reveal any significant leaks in the CVS system.
The analysis console and the sampling system (CVS) were leak
checked daily to determine that the systems were airtight.
2.6.2.2 Test Procedure
The vehicle was manually placed on the dynamometer with the
drive wheels situated on the rollers. The engine compartment cover was
opened and the cooling fan turned on. The CVS and dynamometer were in a
33
-------
warmed up condition with the CVS pump running but not sampling and the
heat exchanger steady at 110°F. The sample flow rates were adjusted and
the flexible exhaust tube connected to the tailpipe. At the beginning of
the test the pump revolution counter and sample collection were simultane-
ously started. After 15 seconds the vehicle was placed in gear and 20
seconds after the engine started the driving schedule commenced. At the 505
second point in the driving schedule the sample was directed into a second
bag through the five second period after the final deceleration. Analysis
of the 505 second bag commenced immediately. At the conclusion of the test
the sampling was stopped and the sample and air bags analyzed, The tail
pipe connector was disconnected, the engine compartment cover closed and
the cooling fan turned off. The interval between the cold start test
and the hot start test was 10 minutes. The test procedure was repeated
for the hot start test. Upon completion of the hot start test the tail pipe
connector was removed and the engine timing idle rpm and dwell were measured,
and recorded. The raw exhaust carbon monoxide level was determined,
2.6.3 Daily Test Schedule
The daily test schedule was generated by a scheduling clerk.
Owners were contacted by phone and requested to have their cars at the
laboratory at a specified time. The clerk prepared a schedule envelope
(Exhibit G) on which the reporting date and time were indicated. All avail-
able vehicle information including the vehicle inspection checklist was
imprinted on the envelope. All recorder tracings and test documents were
placed in this envelope which became the vehicle file folder. Upon com-
pletion of testing for each vehicle the schedule envelope was returned
to the clerk who checked the contents and removed each car tested from the
needed vehicle list.
34
-------
GENERAL ENVIRONMENTS CORPORATION
6840 INDUSTRIAL ROAD
SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22151
NAME
VEHICLE NO.
TEST DATE
RUN NO.
CAR MANUFACTURER^
CAR MODEL
DESCRIPTION: 2 door ( )
4 door ( )
Convertible ( )
Station Wagon ( )
Sedan ( )
Hardtop ( )
Air Conditioned Yes ( ) No ( )
Transmission
Standard 3 Speed ( ) 4 Speed ( )
Automatic ( )
BOND INFORMATION
Name
Co-Maker
SSN
SSN~
Beneficiary, POD_
Address
OWNER NEEDS
Directions ( )
Courtesy Car ( ) Automatic
Standard
Not needed
TEST INFORMATION
Car to be delivered_
Car to be picked up
_date/time
date/time
INSPECTION
1. Engine size agrees with code
2. Exhaust system in good shape
3. Pollution systems appear intact
4. Brakes operative
5. Engine modified
6. Transmission agrees with code
7. No. of carburetor Venturis agrees with code
Remarks:
Yes (
No (
THIS ENVELOPE MUST CONTAIN:
( ) Computer data sheet
( ) Receipt acknowledge (2)
( ) C0-C02 recorder chart
Signed
( ) NOX-THC recorder chart
( ) CVS data sheet
( ) Driver schedule cold start
( ) Driver schedule hot start
EXHIBIT G
35
-------
Normally two eight hour shifts were utilized for the testing.
Cars were put into soak 12 hours prior to the commencement of each shift
and removed from the test area after testing. An average of five cars
were tested each day.
2.7 DATA HANDLING
2.7.1 Data Collection
All necessary data were collected in worksheet form prior to
data debugging and final report tabulation. Initial vehicle data, and
CVS test information were recorded on GEC TEST DATA SHEET 4363.1 (Figure
8). Propane Injection Test Data were recorded on the EPA PROPANE INJECTION
CALCULATION SHEET (Figure 9) and the results were also entered in the
Master Test Log.
After vehicle test completion, analytical and vehicle data were
transferred to the AUTO EMISSION TEST DATA WORKSHEET (Figure 10). This
worksheet comprises the raw input data to be used in computer data reduction
and final hard copy and punched card output.
Other information pertinent to test conditions was recorded in
the Master Test Log. A typical master test log sheet is presented in
Exhibit H.
2.7.2 Data Processing
Processing of data was accomplished by means of a subcontract
to Computer Systems Group, Inc. of Annandale, Virginia. A Control Data
Corporation Model 6600 computer was utilized to calculate and tabulate
the final results of this emissions program.
36
-------
GEC TEST DATA SHEET 4363-1
EMISSION DATA
TEST NUMBER
TYPE OF TEST
INSTRUMENT OPERATION
GENERAL ENVIRONMENTS CORPORATION
6840 INDUSTRIAL ROAD
SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA
VEHICLE OPERATOR
LIGHT DUTY VEHICLE
DATE TIME
MANUFACTURE
MANUFACTURER
TRANSMISSION TYPE _
ODOMETER READING
FUEL TANK LOCATION _
UNOILUTE CO
IDLE TIMING
VEHICLE
, MODEL
__,. NUMBER OF SPEEDS
, .ENGINE DISPLACMENT
"_ _, AIR COND.
, VEHICLE ID. NUMBER
", IDLE R.P.M.
, YEAR
DWELL
DYNAMOMETER
MAKE Clayton , MODEL ECE-50-0 , SERIAL NO. D-33152A-261 , ACTUAL ROAD H.P. AT
50 M.P.H. , INDICATED ROADLOAD POWER ABSORPTION AT 50 M.P.H.
DRIVE WHEEL TIRE PRESSURE , INERTIA
SAMPLING SYSTEM INFORMATION
SERIAL NO. 6274, MODEL NO. 501, MANUFACTURER Scott Research Labs, TYPE Variable Dilution
Test
02T
02S
03T
03S
PB
In Hg
AP
mm Hg
Inlet
Dept.
In H20
Total
Revs
Tp
°R
*PR
W°
°F
D°
°F
?
Sample
Flow
SCFH
Air
Flow
SCFH
FIGURE (8)
37
-------
EPA Propane Injection Calculation Sheet
Vmix = Kl * Vo x N
V = x V
mix .6947368 x VQ
HC
x N
HC - V x 17,3 x c°nc
mass mix
TWo, oao
x T
OJ
00
HC
mass
x 17.3 x
Bar » inHG x 25.4 = mmHG
Inlet Dep. » inH^O x 1.868 = mmHG
2
P .= Bar - inlet dep.
p r ,
T •;= 460 + temp, of exhaust gas __
Cyl Wt. Before
' Cyl Wt. After
A Wt.
Calc. Wt.
% Diff.
_GMS.
CMS.
CMS.
CMS.
FIGURE (9)
-------
GENERAL ENVIRONMENTS CORPORATION
AUTO EMISSION TEST DATA WORKSHEET
U)
Co
P3
CAR
7
8
9
10
'
11
RUN
#
12
13
U
15
DATE
YYMMDD
16
17
18
19
20
21
MOD
YR.
23
23
MK
CD
24
25
MAKE
26
27
28
29
MODEL
si
31
3]
33
CID
34
35
36
V
37
T
38
h'GHT
39
40
41
42
HEADER CARD-
RLHP
43
44
45
w°
46
47
D°
48
49
BARM
so
SI
52
53
C
54
A
55
E
56
X
57
P
58
ODOM.
i
i
S9J60
61
62
63
64
TK
CAP
65
66
IDLE
RPM
67
68
69
70
G
71
DWELL
72
73
74
TIME
75|76
77
78
E
79
80
TEST 02T
"01"
ALPHA
1
o
0
3
I
CAR NO.
6
3
10
PUMP VOLUME
n
0
12
O
13
0
14
O
15
•
16
17
18
19
20
PUMP REVS
21
O
22
O
23
O
24
O
25
26
J7
28
29
30
BARO. PR.
31
32
33
•
34
•
35
INLET PR
36
37
38
A
39
40
TEMP
41
42
43
44
•
45
46
47
48
49
50
GRAINS/LB. OF AIR
51
O
52
O
53
0
54
O
55
•
56
57
58
59
60
"02"
SAMPLE BAG
Sc
%H
:
•
Sc
%c
D
•
S
c%
:o:
2
•
—
Sc
_
tNI
)X
•
s<
At
0
•
AIRBAG
c
>c*
HC
•
Sc
%C
0
•
Sc
tec
32
•
Scl
sNC
X
•
1
)Ct
NO
•
-------
AUTO EMISSION TEST DATA WORKSHEET (cont'd)
TEST 02S
CARD 01
CARD 02
TEST 03T
CARD 01
CARD 02
TEST 035
CARD 01
CARn 02
ALPHA
l
O
1
O
3
3
4
/
CAR NO.
5
fe
6
3
7
B
?
10
PUMP VOLUME
11
O
13
0
13
O
u
O
H
•
16
17
18
19
20
PUMP REVS
21
O
•n
0
23
0
24
0
25
26
27
26
29
30
BARO. PR.
31
32
" .
33
0
34
35
INLET PR
36
37
38
O
39
40
THMP
41
42
43
44
•
45
46
47
48-
49
50
GRAINS/l.B: OF AIR
M
O
«
O
«
O
S4
O
ss
0
M
47
M
^9
*n
SAMPLE BAG
Sc*.IIC
1
3
3
4
0
5
Sc'iCO
6
7
e
9
o
10
Sc%C02
ll
12
13
14
o
IS
Sc%NOX
16
17
18
19
o
20
Sc%NO
21
22
23
24
o
25
AIRBAG
Sc'iHC
26
1
|
27
28
29
a
30
l_Sc?iCO
31
32
33
34
o
35
Sc%C02
36
37
38
39
0
40
Sc%NOX
41 42
|
43
44
o
45
Sc?;NO
46
47
48
49
o
50
ALPHA
i
O
2
O
3
3
4
1
CAR NO.
5
6
6
3
1
8
»
10
II
O
i]
0
PUMP
13
O
14
O
VOLUME
15
•
16
17
IB
19
20
PUMP REVS
21
O
22
O
23
O
24
O
25
26
27
W
29
30
DARO. PR.
31
32
3j
o
34
35
INLET PR
36
37
3B
o
39
40
TEMP
41
42
43
44
•
45
46
47
48
49
50
GRAINS/LB. OF AIR
51
0
52
O
53
0
54
0
55
•
V,
S7
M
59F60
SAMPLE BAG 1 AIRBAG
Sc*.IIC
1
0
Sc°iCO
a
9
e
10
Sc%C02
II
12
13
14
o
11
Sc%NOX
It 17
i
18
19'
a
20
Sc%NO I ScWIC
21
22
•
23
34
o
25) 26
1
27
28
29
a
30
Sc'sCO •
3l|}2
33
34
o
35
Sc%C02
ri7
37
38
39
0
40
Sc'iNOX
41
42
43
44
o
45
Sc%NO
46
47
48
49
a
50
0
ALPHA
O
S
/
CAR NO.
f,
3
O
O
PUMP
O
O
VOLUME
o
0
O
PUMP
0
REVS
BAR
D.
A
PR.
I
\!LE
.T
O
PR
— i
TE
MP
•
47
4fl
-------
EXHIBIT H
31 March 1973
0700 CVS turned on for 20 minute warmup. F.I.D. analyzer on, NOx analyzer
on. Leak check of all instrument and sampling systems - OK.
0720 Propane injection started. CVS operated @ 300 CFM.
0730 NOX converter efficiency test conducted - results satisfactory.
0745 Dyno warmed up. Repeat leak check of instrument systems - OK.
0750 Results of propane injection - 0.19% - OK.
0805 Dyno warmup completed with non-test vehicle. Inertia weights and
RLHP set at 4500 and 9.35(i) respectively. Speed recorders checked.
0815 Olds Delta 88 LN# VA CMS-694 placed on dyno. Vehicle No. 0001.
Run 0001.
0840 Test (cold start) commenced. Veh. 0001, Run 0001.
0914 Hot start test started on Veh. No. 0001, Run 0001.
1005 C.S. test started Veh. No. 0002, Run 0002.
1034 H. S. test started Veh. No. 0002, Run 0002.
1200 C. S. test started on Veh. No. 0003, Run 0003. Lie. No. DME-657 (VA).
1232 H.S. test started Veh. No. 0003, Run 0003.
1321 C.S. test started Veh. No. 0004, Run 0004. Lie. No. FDD-130 (VA).
1352 H.S. test started Veh. No. 0004, Run 0004.
39
-------
Data was keypunched and key verified from the input provided by
GEC. Tab runs were made at intervals to double-check data for any
obvious errors. Each four-card set required in the contract scope of work
for submission to EPA was generated from a nine-card set which contained
vehicle identification and analytical data. This nine^card set containing
raw data was used as the computer input and as a means of cross checking
the four-card output for errors of data entry and keypunching, Tabular
listings of data were generated during the test phase to provide ready
access of completed data, Four-card sets and nine-card sets were cross-
checked against the header card input and tab run concentration valuesv
Errors discovered in data as a result of input mistakes were immediately
receded in correct form. Errors attributable directly to the testing
program were eliminated by retest of the vehicle.
Calculation of the exhaust emissions for 1972 and 1975 were per*-
formed according to the procedures defined in Exhibits I and J, respectively,
40
-------
EXHIBIT I
(1)
(2)
(3)
Hydrocarbon Mass:
HCmass = Vmix X DensityHC X '::::
1 , (JUU,
Carbon Monoxide Mass:
COconc
COmass = Vmix X DensityCO X
Oxides of Nitrogen Mass:
100
NOXmass = Vmix X DensityNO X
NOXconc
2 1,000,000
Meaning of symbols:
HCmass
DensityHC
HCconc
COmass
DensityCO
COconc
NOXmass
DensityNO
NOXconc
Vmix
Vmix
= Hydrocarbon emissions, in grams per vehicle mile.
= Density of hydrocarbons in the exhaust gas, assuming
an average carbon to hydrogen ratio of 1:1.85, in
grams per cubic foot at 68°F. and 760 mm Hg pressure
(16.33 gm/cu ft).
= Hydrocarbon concentration of the dilute exhaust sam-
ple minus hydrocarbon concentration of the dilution air
sample, in ppm carbon equivalent, i.e., equivalent pro-
pane X 3.
= Carbon monoxide emissions, in grams per vehicle mile.
= Density of carbon monoxide in grams per cubic foot at
68°F. and 760 mm Hg pressure (32.97 gm/cu ft).
= Carbon monoxide concentration of the dilute exhaust
sample minus the carbon monoxide concentration of the
dilution air sample, in volume percent.
= Oxides of nitrogen emissions, in grams per vehicle mile.
= Density of oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust gas, as-
suming they are in the form of nitrogen dioxide, in
grams per cubic foot at 68°F. and 760 mm Hg pressure
(54.16 gm/cu ft).
= Oxides of nitrogen concentration of the dilute exhaust
sample minus the oxides of nitrogen concentration of
the dilution air sample, in ppm.
= Total dilute exhaust volume in cubic feet per mile, cor-
rected to standard conditions (528°R. and 760 mm Hg).
P
= K: X VQ X N X ^
41
-------
c 9Q° D
where: K. = =— „ v 1 n = 0.09263
1 760 mm Hg X 7.5 miles
V = Volume of gas pumped by the positive displacement pump, in
cubic feet per revolution. This volume is dependent on the
pressure differential across the positive displacement pump.
N = Number of revolutions of the positive displacement pump
during the test while samples are being collected.
P = Absolute pressure of the dilute exhaust entering the positive
displacement pump, in mm Hg, i.e., barometric pressure minus
the pressure depression below atmospheric of the mixture enter-
ing the positive displacement pump.
T = Average temperature of dilute exhaust entering positive dis-
" placement pump during test while samples are being collected,
in degrees Rankin .
IC^ = Humidity correction factor.
11 1 - 0.0047 (H - 75)
where: H = Absolute humidity in grains of water per pound of dry air.
Example calculation of mass emission values:
Assume V = 0.265 cu ft per revolution; N = 20,250 revolutions;
H = 85 grains per Ib of dry air; P = 730 mm Hg; T = 550°R.;
HCconc = 160 ppm carbon equivalent; COconc = 0.09%; and NOXconc
= 70 ppm.
Then: Vmix = (0.09263) (0.265) (20,250) (730/550 = 659.8 cu ft per mile.
KH = 1 - 0.0047 (85 - 75) = 1'049'
(1) For a 1972 light-duty vehicle.
HCmass = 659.8 X 16.33 X QQ QQO = 1.72 grams per vehicle mile
NOXmass = 659.8 X 54.16 X , -J° -.-, X 1.049 = 2.62 grams per vehicle mile
J..UL/U.UUU »
(2) For a 1972 utility vehicle.
COmass = 659.8 X 32.97 X °-09 * °-85 = 16.6 grams per vehicle mile.
36 Federal Register 128, 2 July 1971
42
-------
EXHIBIT J
(a) For light-duty vehicles:
Ywm = (0.43Yct + 0.57Yht + Ys)/7.5
where: Ywm = Weighted mass emissions of each pollutant, i.e., HC, CO, or
NOX, in grams per vehicle mile.
Yet = Mass emissions as calculated from the "transient" phase of
the cold start test, in grams per test phase.
Yht = Mass emissions as calculated from the "transient" phase of
the hot start test, in grams per test phase.
Ys = Mass emissions as calculated from the "stabilized" phase
of the cold start test, in grams per test phase.
(b) The mass of each pollutant for each phase of both the cold start
test and the hot start test is determined from the following:
(1) Hydrocarbon Mass:
HCconc
HCmass = Vmix X DensityHC X i— ooo
(2) Carbon monoxide Mass:
COmass = Vmix X DensityCO X
(3) Oxides of nitrogen Mass:
NOXmass = Vmix X DensityNO- X X 1C.
z 1 , UUU , UUU H
(c) Meaning of symbols:
HCmass = Hydrocarbon emissions, in grams per test phase.
DensityHC = Density of hydrocarbons in the exhaust gas, assuming
an average carbon to hydrogen ratio of 1:1.85, in grams
per cubic foot at 68°F and 760 mm Hg pressure (16.33 gm/ft)
HCconc = Hydrocarbon concentration of the dilute exhaust sample
corrected for background, in ppm carbon equivalent, i.e.,
equivalent propane X 3.
43
-------
HCconc = HCe - HCd (1 - 1/DF)
where: HCe = Hydrocarbon concentrations of the dilute exhaust sample as
measured, in ppm carbon equivalent.
HCd = Hydrocarbon concentration of the dilution air as measured
ppm carbon equivalent.
NOXmass = Oxides of nitrogen emissions, in grams per test phase.
DensityNO? = Density of oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust gas, assum-
ing they are in the form of nitrogen dioxide, in grams,per
cubic foot at 68°F and 760 mm Hg pressure (54.16 gm/ft ).
NOXconc = Oxides of nitrogen concentration of the dilute exhaust sample
corrected for background in ppm.
NOXconc = NOXe - NOXd (1 - 1/DF)
where: NOXe = Oxides of nitrogen concentration of the dilute exhaust
sample as measured in ppm.
NOXd = Oxides of nitrogen concentration of the dilution air
as measured in ppm.
COmass = Carbon monoxide emissions, in grams per test phase.
DensityCO = Density of carbon monoxide in grams per cubic foot at
68°F and 760 mm Hg pressure (32.97 gm/ft ).
COconc = Carbon monoxide concentration of the dilute exhaust sample
corrected for background, water vapor and C02 extraction in
ppm.
COconc = COe - COd (1 - 1/DF)
where: COe = Carbon monoxide concentration of the dilute exhaust sample
volume corrected for water vapor and carbon dioxide extrac-
tion in ppm. The calculation assumes the carbon to hydrogen
ratio of the fuel is 1:1.85.
COe = (1 - 0.01925C02e - 0.00323R) COem
where: COem = Carbon monoxide concentration of the dilute exhaust sample
as measured in ppm.
C02e = Carbon dioxide concentration of the dilute exhaust sample
in mole percent.
R = Relative humidity of the dilution air in percent.
44
-------
COd = Carbon monoxide concentration of the dilution air corrected
for water vapor extraction in ppm.
COd = (1 - 0.000323R) COdm
where: COdm = Carbon monoxide concentration of the dilution air sample
as measured in ppm.
np _ _ 15.4 _
C02e + (HCe + COe) X 10 '4
Vmix = Total dilute exhaust volume in cubic feet per test phase
corrected to standard conditions (528°R and 760 mm Hg) .
Vmix = V X N (PR - Pi) C528°R)
V J1I.L .A. —• " r\ *V * ' f "^ s f\ 11 •* frrt "\
0 (760 mm Hg) (Tp)
where: VQ = Volume of gas pumped by the positive displacement pump,
in cubic feet per revolution. This volume is dependent
on the pressure differential across the positive dis-
placement pump.
N = Number of revolutions of the positive displacement pump
during the test phase while samples are being collected.
PD = Barometric pressure in mm Hg.
D
Pi = Pressure depression below atmosphere measured at the inlet
to the positive displacement pump.
Tp = Average temperature of dilute exhaust entering positive
displacement pump during test while samples are being
collected, in degrees Rankin.
IC = Humidity correction factor.
.
1 " 1 - 0.0047 (H - 75)
where: H = Absolute humidity in grains of water per pound of dry air.
(43.478) Ra X Pd
PD - Pd X Ra/100
D
Ra = Relative humidity of the ambient air, in percent.
Pd = Saturated vapor pressure, in mm Hg- at the ambient dry
bulb temperature.
45
-------
(d) Example calculation of mass emission values:
(1) For the "transient" phase of the cold start test assume
V = 0.29344 cu ft per revolution; N = 10, 485; R = 48.0%;
R = 48.2%; P = 762 mm Hg; P, = 22.225 mm Hg; P. = 70 mm Hg;
T = 570°R. ; HC = 105.8 ppm carbon equivalent; NOX = 11.2 ppm;
P C G
CO = 306.6 ppm; CO- = 1.43%; HCd = 12.1 ppm. NOX, = 0.8 ppm;
CO, = 15.3 ppm. Then:
dm r
. (0.29344) (10 485JI (762 - 70) (528) . ^^ ^ ft per ^ phase.
., .
Vmix
- (43.478) (48.2) (22.225) = ,
762 - (22.225 X 48.2/100)
1 - 0.0047 (62 - 75)
= 0.9424.
C0e = (1 - 0.01925 (1.43) - 0.000323 (48)) 306.0 = 293.4 ppm.
CO, = (1 - 0.000323(48)) 15.3 = 15.1 ppm.
'd
13.4
DF 1.43 + (105.8 + 293.4) X 10'4 9-116-
HCconc = 105.8 - 12.1 (1 - 1/9.116) = 95.03.
HCmass = (2595) (16.33) (95.03/1,000,000) = 4.027 grams per
test phase.
NOXconc = 11.2 - 0.8 (1 - 1/9.116) = 10.49.
NOXmass = (2595) (54.16) (10.49/1,000,000) (0.9424) = 1.389 grams
per test phase.
COconc = 293.4 - 15.1 (1 - 1/9.116) = 280.
COmass = (2595) (32.97) (280/1,000,000) = 23.96 grams per test phase.
(2) For the "stabilized" portion of the cold start test assume that
similar calculations resulted in HCmass = 0.62 grams per test
phase; NOXmass = 1.27 grams per test phase; and COmass = 5.98
grams per test phase.
46
-------
(3) For the "transient" portion of the hot start test assume that
similar calculations resulted in HCmass = 0.51 grams per test
phase; NOXmass = 1.38 grams per test phase; and COmass = 5.01
grams, per test phase.
(4) For a 1975 light-duty vehicle:
HC = ((0.43) (4.027) + (0.57) (0.51) + 0.62)/7.5
Will
= 0.352 gram per vehicle mile.
NOX = ((0.43) (1.389) + (0.57) (1.38) + 1.27)/7.5
wm
= 0.354 gram per vehicle mile.
CO = ((0.43) (23.96) + (0.57) (5.01) + 5.89)/7.5
Will
= 2.55 grams per vehicle mile.
37 Federal Register 221, 15 November 1972
47
-------
HEATING OILS
GASOLINES
DIESEL FUELS
INDUSTRIAL LUBRICANTS
TEXACO PRODUCTS
TELEPHONE 373-1543
P. O. BOX 822
FREDERICKSBURG. VA. 224O1
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CONSIGNEE:
PRODUCT:
TANK:
DATE TESTED
J. A. NERE CO. INC.
P.O. Box 822
Fredericksburg, Va.
P.O. # 4040 dated 2/2/73
Indolene Leaded Motor Fuel No. 30
25
3-25-72
PRODUCT ANALYSIS
TEST
TEST
SAMPLE
RESULTS
NO. D-18059
API Gravity
Distillation % F.
Initial Boiling Point
10% Evap.
50% Evap.
90% Evap.
Maximum
10% Slope
Reid Vapor Pressure
Oxidation Stability Minutes
Gum, rag/100 ml (after Hexane work)
TEL Content, cc/gal.
Sulfur Weight, %
Olefin, %
Aromatic, %
Saturates, %
Octane Research with 3.0 cc Tel/Gal.
Octane Motor with 3.0 cc Tel/Gal.
Sensitivity with 3.0 cc Tel/Gal.
59.5
92
132
221
316
401
2.8
9.0
600 +
2.4
3. 02
0.06
5.9
27.3
66.8
104.1
96.1
8.0
J. A. GRANT, Superintendent-Laboratories!
per J. G. DUBECK
BY
MAK
J. A. NERE GO., INC,
FREDERICKSBURG, V& 22401
48
-------
APPENDIX II
TABLE NO. TITLE
1A Exhaust Emissions vs. Vehicle Make, 1972
IB Exhaust Emissions vs. Vehicle Make, 1975
2A Exhaust Emissions vs. Vehicle Manufacturer, 1972
2B Exhaust Emissions vs. Vehicle Manufacturer, 1975
3A Exhaust Emissions vs. Model Year, 1972
3B Exhaust Emissions vs. Model Year, 1975
4A Exhaust Emissions vs. Number of Cylinders, 1972
4B Exhaust Emissions vs. Number of Cylinders, 1975
5A Exhaust Emissions vs. Engine Displacement, 1972
5B Exhaust Emissions vs. Engine Displacement, 1975
6A Exhaust Emissions vs. Vehicle Inertia Weight, 1972
6B Exhaust Emissions vs. Vehicle Inertia Weight, 1975
7A Exhaust Emissions vs. Transmission Type, 1972
7B Exhaust Emissions vs. Transmission Type, 1975
8A Exhaust Emissions vs. Carburetor Venturis, 1972
8B Exhaust Emissions vs. Carburetor Venturis, 1975
9A Exhaust Emissions vs. Replicate Testing, 1972
9B Exhaust Emissions vs. Replicate Testing, 1975
10A Vehicles Meeting 1972 Federal Standards
12 Vehicle Information Summary
13A Vehicle Exhaust Emission Results, 1972
13B Vehicle Exhaust Emission Results, 1975
49
-------
on
O
TABLE 1A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN G»-\M5/MlLE
•
VS.
^VEHICLE MAKE"
WASHINGTON* OoC.
1972 FEDERAL TEST
NUMBER OF
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
DAT SUN
(JOOGE
FORu
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PuNTlAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL vEHICLt •
VEHICLES
s
12
4
39
4
2
10
3b
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
170
HC
ME*N
4.b3
b.39
3.4b
b.b3
b.^7
2.43
b.73
4.72
b.c:b
b.03
b.b7
2.32
4., 10
b.bb
2.21
9.4b
D.04
CO CO^
S.U.
2.1b
b.2b
2. bo
t>.2<*
1 . 9b
o 36
4.13
2.4b
0.00
4.04
2.7o
0.00
1.48
3.31
.19
17. Mb
b.bl
MEAN
7B.47
01.49
bb.93
74.37
79. 4b
Ib.b3
78.42
bO.bb
133.35
02. 2b
Bb. IB
41.02
b9.2b
bb.73
19.32
44.01
bb.rtl
q.O. MEAN S.
53. BO
37.03
36.37
30. 3b
4i.o3
1.74
39.20
33.17
0.00
47.0^
19.34
O.GO
12.33
?9.b3
b.Bri
U . 0 ^
37.b->
4? 3. 24
6) 7.7S
bf>4.9?
bl 1.4?
b^^.oc;
312. 4S
4*^.oc;
bn/.'bM
6 3 b . V 7
b?b.^S
b?0.07
2]b.7Q
4S1.9M
b:)3. 04
310.11
2=,S.3h
b',i9.<*4
73.
Ib4.
106.
IbO.
79.
i3.
Ob.
135.
0.
02.
140.
0.
VH.
111.
b5.
b3.
ib5.
0.
bb
21
2B
91
bb
29
2b
b4
00
47
9b
00
19
94
19
72
2b
3
4
4
3
^
4
4
4
2
4
3
1
M
i+
3
2
4
MEA'
.21
.30
.34
.60
.10
.bb
«3b
,b4
.30
.Ob
. 7b
.He
.79
.20
.b/
.lb
.0^:
'OXC
! S . D .
.01
I.b9
l.bb
1.40
1.48
I.b2
1.24
1.-33
0.00
I.b2
1 ,3b
0.00
I.b2
1.64
l.lb
.72
I.b2
-------
FMT3SION TtST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILK
VS.
*V'r.HICL£ KAKE*
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
AMC
BUICK
CADILLAC
CHRYSLr1?
OAT SUN
DODGt
FO?D
L I NC PL N
MERCURY
OLDSMO^ILfc"
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTUC
TOYOTA
VOLKJWAG-'J
U'l^IR OF
ViHlCLtlS
5
12
H
39
u
2
10
3=5
1
7
11
1
12
14
3
10
HC
CO
MS AM S.D.
3.
5.
3.
5.
«*.
2.
5.
4.
4.
5.
4.
1.
3.
5 .
2.
9.
98
5*
05
97
93
33
10
29
13
19
55
p.O
66
03
06
22
1.
5.
2.
5.
1.
,
3.
2.
0.
3.
1.
0.
1.
2.
.
18.
81
19
39
13
94
29
75
38
00
62
49
30
33
94
19
34
MEAN
69.
6+
.39
79.14
141.49
167,44
146.06
68.25
1.38
74.60
129.86
0.00
81.18
133.21
0.00
92.84
109.36
54.58
56.34
NOXC
MEAN
3o27
4.46
4.33
3.71
5.32
4.72
4.64
4.69
2.17
4.30
3.86
1.97
5.09
4.35
3.63
2.03
S.O
1.07
Io72
1.62
1.35
1.40
1.57
1.18
1.64
0.00
1.70
1.39
0.00
1.61
1.73
1.10
.64
ALL V-:HICL*;:S
170
5.08
5.57
5d.7Q 35.62
.2? 147.55
4.14
1.60
-------
TABLE 2A
'in,
K)
EXHAUST EMISSION TE.ST RESULTS 1M G«AMS/MILE.
VS.
"VEHICLE MANUFACTURER*
WASHINGTON* D.C.
1972 FEOENAL TEST oROCEDURrl
AMC
CHRYSLER
FORD
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
ALL VEHICLES
NUMbLR OF
VEHICLES
5
26
<*3
81
2
3
10
170
HC
MEAN
4.53
b.02
4.91
6.02
2.43
2.21
9.48
b.64
CO
S.U.
2 . 1 b
2.89
2.71
4.53
.38
.19
17.88.
b.61
MEAN
78.^7
74.35
65. 8b
7^.22
15.63
19.32
44.01
08.81
S.D.
53.80
35.22
37.19
36.65
1.74
6.8H
31.02
3/.b9
C02
MOXC
MEAN S.D. MEAf'
4^3.24
4*0.75
5? 1.70
5^1.83
3)2.45
316.13
255. 3n
5!;9.94
73.55
95.60
129.66
156.27
13.29
bh.19
63.72
155.25
3.21
4.67
4.41
3.88
H.56
3.67
2.15
4.02
! S.D
.81
1.38
1.53
1.47
1.52
1.15
.72
1.52
-------
TA6L~
2B
U)
AMC
CHRYSL5.F
FORO
GM
NISSAN
TOYOTA
VOLKSHAGHM
ALL VSTHICLi
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS.
^VEHICLE MANUFACTURER*
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1975 FEDERAL TtST PROCEDURE
NlHBti
*/£Hl
R OF
CL~S
5
26
^ 3
81
2
3
10
170
HC
M^AN
3.98
(+ . ^2
u . U3
5. 37
2.38
2.05
9.22
5.03
S.D.
1.
2.
2.
(4.
.
.
18.
5.
81
61
57
3<+
29
19
3U
57
CO
MEAN
69.58
6<*.78
57.31
61.53
15.25
17.96
<*l.i7
53.70
S.D.
52.15
36.22
36.57
33.86
1.85
5.35
31.25
35.62
C02
MEAN
i.15.51
it67.au
508.19
543.38
306. 3
-------
TABLE
EXHAUST ^MISSION TEST RESULTS IN
tn
"MODEL YEAR*
A^HlNr,TON« D.r.
FEDERAL TEST PRQCEOUKE
1966
1967
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
NUMdEK OF
VEH
ICLES
17
18
21
22
27
30
35
HC
MEAN
12. b*
9.30
b.20
t.bl
4.78
4.25
3.23
S.D.
13.
t.
2.
1.
2.
3.
1.
61
47
07
Ul
73
16
27
CO
MEAN S.O.
1 J 8 . 9 i ? 8 . b 7
1 08.<*1 ?8.8b
71.66 33.16
69.50 ^b.9e
63.15 13.61
53.22 29. bM
44.58 i>7.94
406
**^0
4H9
^ 1 6
4Q5
51 h
6l<+
C02
ME&N S
.4? 98
.76 95
.81 95
.3R 107
.11 127
.3^ 102
.9? 192
.1'.
.bt
.83
.18
.27
.00
.49
.20
3.
3.
4.
5.
3.
»+.
4.
J 1
MEAM
U8
19
00
09
8b
It
23
OXC
S.U.
1.37
1.34
1 .5b
I.b6
1.23
1.55
1.31
ALL VEHICLES
170
b.64 5.ol
68.81
Ib5.2b
1.52
-------
TABLE 3B
FHISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS.
*MOO£l YEAR*
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
N'JMRco OF HC CO CO2 NOXC
V/tHinL'^S MEAN S.O. ME«N S.O. M!£AN S.D. MEAN S.O.
196S 17 11.vb 13.96 95.36 39.32 396.1*1 96.1*9 3.20 1.49
1967 18 8.63 4.62 97.26 26.31 ^16.77 90.15 3.36 1.37
1968 21 *f.72 2.00 63.19 32.<+<+ <*78.10 89.11 4.12 1.69
1969 22
-------
•; • . TABLE 4A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN
VS.
*NUM8EK OF CYLINDERS*
WASHINGTON* D«C«
On
TEST
OF HC. CO C02
VEHICLES MEAN s.j. MEAN s.n. MEAN s.o. MEAM s.u,
6 130 b.tt'O ^.01 75.02 ?b.U^ .bh^.VO 130.^1 ^.IV 1.51
6 21 ^.05 2.00 b8.b3 ?8.b^ JW.Vii. f5./i?3 ^.09 1.36
4 19 6.31 13.11 37.61. ?5.
-------
\SI
-J
8
6
4
ALL VFHICLF.S
TA3LF. «*R
:XH«UST FHISSION TT.ST PF-SULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS.
*NUM8ER OF CYLINOTRS*
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
UM9r:V; OF
VrHIOLtS
130
21
19
170
Mft
5.
3.
6.
5.
HO
N
19
52
03
08
S • 0.
3.81
1. 73
13.42
5.57
*E
63.
49 •
3
-------
FABLE 5A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GK;.MS/MlLE
vs.
"ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CU^IC INCHES)"
WASriIhr,TON» O.C«
FEDERAL JEST
NUMdEW OF HC CO CO^ ' UXC
VEHICLES ME^N s.o. MEAN Q.O. MEAN S.D. MEAM s.u.
LESS THAN 2S1 ^0 5. 15 , <*.0y 4h.V5 ^b.^tt J^O.^^ Y2.71 J.^J 1.4^
251 - 3130 **3 7.34 b.^7 76.^9 4I.U3 4^6.0(1 t)2.^1 "3.bb l.^o
331 - 399 57 S.^t; 3.3tt dO./^B ?b.7U 377.30 li>6.6^ A. 17 l.^tt
MORE THAN 3-5^ 30 <+.dl 1.79 O^.Ob 10.^1 bnu.si 117.13 ^.b^ 1.^3
ALL VEHICLE'- I7j t>.64 S.bl OH. Hi 77.64 5.-':S>.44
-------
5B
EXHAUST EMISSION TtST RESULTS IN G^AMS/MILE
VS.
ȣNGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)*
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1975 FEDFP4L TEST PROCEDURE
NiM3';:R or
V-IHICLiiS
40
43
57
30
HC
H-fiN
4.73
P>« F>8
t .88
3.63
S.D.
9.
5.
3.
1.
26
02
16
70
^1 c.
42.
66.
67.
51.
CO
AN
61
21
96
82
S.O.
27.39
36.50
33.74
29.99
C02
MEAN
32
-------
TABLE
ibOl-2000
2001-2bOC
2501-3000
3001-3500
3S01-4000
4C01-4SOG
4bOi-bOOO
5001-bbGG
EXHAUST tMISSION TtST PESilLTS IN ijki
VS.
^VEHICLE INERTIA-WEIGHT li_riS)«
WASHINGTON* O.C.
1972 FEDthAL TEST »
OF
VEHICLES
, HC
MEAN S.O.
CO
MEAN
Q
11
2H
31
44
3,9
7
1
9.86
3.23
•,b-.2b
6.20
b..78
4. 74
3.<+3
3.97
18.94
.94
b.7b
4.bdf
3.34
1./2
1.81
0.00
*2.72
37.43
bb.76
73.93
80.18
71.75
b2.29
76.79
33.81
J9.2b
lb.91
18.95
42.^b
-'9.88
^9.b/
0 . 0 U
2S7.89 81.82
3uu.Bv 35.22
3M7.JH b3.72
b?6.0<+ 93.13
b,>7.7S 104.21
o.iJ3.b^ 1^0.76
76b.7« 134.01
7a7.tt^ U.OU
2. 18
3.13
3.6b
3.02
*.22
4.92
**.b8
, H.bi
1.07
1.03
1.2b
1.19
1.62
1.38
1.62
0.00
ALL VEHICLE^
170
b.ol
Ob. 41
-------
TAtfLE
6*3
ON
H
LXHAUST EMISSION Tf.?T RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS.
*Vf-HICLE INE'.TIA HEIGHT (L8S)*
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1975 FrOiRAL T£ST PROCEDURE
1501
2001
-2000
-2500
NLMfl^R OF
V-HIOLcS
9
11
2501-30(30 28
3001
3501
4001
4501
soni
-35C-]
-4000
-4500
-50GO
-5509
31
U4
39
7
1
HC
HF.ANI
9.77
2.32
5.11
5.60
5. GO
4.23
2.97
2.53
S.O.
19. 36
. 3<«
5.75
4. 12
2.91
1. 73
1.63
0. 00
CO
-IE AN
40.64
32.33
57.76
63.64
67.60
63.27
42.62
44.55
S.O.
33.92
17. 4 P
35.42
33.07
38.75
31. C5
33.32
0.00
C02
MEAN
255.96
292.77
380.57
510.93
512.45
509.92
724.27
775.00
S.D.
74.34
32.18
52.08
89.37
98.62
114.81
115.12
0.00
2.
3.
3.
3.
4.
5.
4.
4.
NOXC
MEAN
20
03
73
74
44
05
65
75
S.O.
1.03
1.15
1.33
1.21
1.73
1.44
1.80
0.00
ALL V£HIOL:'.S
170
53.70 35.62 495.28 147.55
4.14
1.60
-------
TABLE 7A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN
"TRANSMISSION
WASHINGTON* D.C»
1972 FEDERAL TEST OKOC
OF HC CO COd 0.76 /43.36 Ju.3.o^ 13B.21 2.3B ,HU
ttOTH TYPES I/O b.6^+ b.6l 66.bl ^7.69 b'^.4^ lbb.2b 4.02 I.b2
-------
TAHLC 7V
C.XHOUST EMISSION TFST RESULTS IN GkAMS/MlLE
VS.
TRANSMISSION TYF£*
WASHINGTON, O.C.
CT\
^ 1975 FEOEPU TEST PROCEDURE
MU13c:' ? OF HC CD C02 NOXC
;~HTCLc~S MEAN S.D. M?_AN S.O. MEAN S.D. MEAN S.D,
AUTOMATIC m*t 4.61 3.19 59.53 5t.56 523.7? 131.77 ^.^6 1.50
MANUAL 2& 7.fe6 11.98 5!».13 «*1.«»9 337.62 131.68 2.35 .77
BOTH TYPES 170 c,.08 1.57 58.70 35.62 *95..?8 1^7.55 k. Ik 1.60
-------
FABLr.
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN. GR^
VS.
^NUMBER OF CARBURETOR v/ENTURlS"
WASHINGTON* D.r.
1972 FEDERAL TEST PRoCEuURt.
FOUR BARREL
TWO BARREL
ONE BARREL
FUEL INJECTS
OK HC
VEHICLES MEAN s.o.
Jl b.04 2.82
104 b.86 4.2b
34 b.b4 9.82
1 2.38 0.00
CO
MEAN S.O.
72.b2 33.9i
bl.bl
11.77
0.00
MEAN S.U.
6?6.l4 137.fa9
b34.bg 130.27
333.bR 74.39
3P6.7] 0.00
MOAC
MEAV S.D,
4.b7 1.41
4.03 1.53
3.^4 1.39
2.42 0.00
ALL TYPES
170
b.b4
5.
bb.Bl
4.02
I.b2
-------
TARLF 33
EMISSION TtST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS.
N3-:
-------
TABLE 9A
«
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
VS.
REPLICATE TESTING USING PAIRED *T» TEST
WASHINGTON9 D.C.
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
NUMBER OF HC
VEHICLES MEAN S.D.
FIRST TEST
SECOND TEST
BETWEEN TESTS
(PAIRED «T«)
10
10
10
7.59
6.63
7.75
4.87
.96 3.54
CO
MEAN S.Do
C02
MEAN SoDo
67066 35.04 524.61 131.54
62.23 36.15 547.48 178.64
5.43 24.25 -22.87 100.73
NOXC
MEAN SoDo
.97
088
.96
3090
007
FIRST AND SECOND TESTS
MEAN = SUM OF EA. VEHICLE GM/MI BY GAS DIVIDED BY NUMBER VEHICLES
SD = SO RT tNUMBER VEHICLES X SUM EA. SCORE SOUARED - SUM OFSCORES SQUARED
DIVIDED BY NO. VEHICLES X NO. VEHICLES-!)
BETWEEN TESTS
MEAN * MEAN TEST1 - MEAN TEST2
SD = SO RT (NUMBER VEHICLES X SUM OF((SCORE TEST1-SCORE TEST2)SQUARED) -
SUM OF SCORE TESTl - SCORE TEST2 SQUARED
DIVIDED BY (NO. VEHICLES X NO. VEHICLES - 1)J
-------
FIRST TiST
S ECO I-JD T-ST
TA?LE 93
FAUST EMISSION TFST SF.SULTS IN GRAMS/MIL'
VS.
P"°LICAT:: TESTING USING PAIPFQ *T* TEST
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1975 FEDERAL T-£ST FSOCcIOURt
IJ
V
13r:..R OF
iHICLES
10
10
•10
HO
.•It AN
f. 89
5.90
.99
S.O.
7.
*•
3.
26
47
3P
1?
57.
51.
5.
CO
AN S.O.
57 ?9.83
99 29.84
58 17.10
ME
5C9.1
523.0
-18.9
C02
AN S.
3 127.
7 175.
3 91.
NOXC
0,
93
48
20
MEAN
4,14
3.95
.20
SoQ
1.12
1.00
.85
FIRST AND SfCONO TESTS
KJ-.'fcN = SUM OF f;i, y/CHIOLE Gf/MI BY GAS CIVIDEO 3Y NUMBER VEHICLES
5'f = SQ -T [:-.UMR;-> y/-HICLrS X SU^ tA. SCOFt SQUARED - SUM OFSC03ES SQUARED
DI7IOEO BY NO. VEHICLES X NO. y/EHICLCS-l ]
•3ETW»-.t>: TESTS
lu = SQ PT tNUf-'.P.cr VCHICL.tfS X SUM OF ( (SCORE TtSTl-SCORE TEST2) SQUARED) -
SJ1 OF SCCRF TfSTl - SCOPE TEST2 SOUA-lEO
niVIUrJJ -^Y (NT.. VEHlr.L-:.S X NO. VtHlCLiS - 1)1
-------
lUA
VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEUDAL ST A ..'i
i«A-.,i-ii!.i..roN. n.c.
1972 FEDERAL TEST
NUMdER
00
AMC
ttUlCK
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OPEL
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
VOLKSWAGEN
9bb
I96S
1969
.970
.4
HC
C-.M/MI
%
R PERCENT
1
3
3
9
1
2
3
12
0
1
1
1
^
1
3
3
0
0
3
b
7
I 1
22
20
2b
7b
23
2b
100
30
34
0
14
9
100
33
/
1 JO
30
U
U
14
22
?b
36
20.OU
ib.b7
2b.OO
2b.OO
100.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
b.33
100.00
30.00
0 . u f i
'J . U U
ll.il
ALL .VEHICLES
2 M . 2
1 <* . 7 1
-------
COLUMN DEFINITIONS FOR TABLE 12
Column
Description
Alpha No.
Car #
Run #
Date
Mod Yr.
Mk Cd
MAKE
MODEL
CID
V
T
WGHT
RLHP
W°
D°
BARM
C
A
E
X
P
ODOM
TK CAP
IDLE RPM
G
DWELL
TIME
S
E
Site and Contractor number
Car number
Run number
Date (year, month, day)
Model year
Make code
Vehicle make (first 4 letters)
Vehicle model (first 4 letters)
Engine displacement
Number of carburetor Venturis
Transmission (1-auto, Srthree gears, etc.)
Inertia weight
Roal load horsepower
Wet bulb temperature (°F.)
Dry bulb temperature (°F.)
Barometric pressure (inches of mercury)
Number of cylinders .
Air conditioned (l=yes, 2=no)
Evaporative control device (l=yes,, 2=no)
Exhaust control device (l=yes, 2=no)
PCV present (l=yes, 2=no)
Odometer reading
Fuel tank capacity
Idle revolutions per minute
Gear during idle rpm (l=drive, 2=neutral)
Dwell in degrees
Timing (- indicates ATDC)
Tested as air conditioned (l=yes, 2=no)
Evaporative test (l=yes, 2=no)
-------
TAdLt
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
ALPHA NO. ^
013163 0001
013163 0002
013163 ul
013163 0
013163 0005
013163 0006
013163 0007
013163 Oo08
013163 0009
013163 0010
U13163 0011
013163 0012
013163 0013
013163 0013
013163 0014
013163 0015
013163 00lb
y 13163 0017
013163 0018
RUN
0001
0002
0003
0193
0005
0006
0007
0008
0009
0010
0011
0012
0013
R 0096
0014
0015
0016
0017
0018
DATE
YYMMDD
730331
730331
7 30331
7J0507
730402
7304Q2
730403
730403
730403
73Q40J
73040*+
730404
7304Q5
7304.0
730405
730405
730406
730400
7 J04QO
MOD
72
71
70
70
68
72
71
6b
69
6b
68
67
66
66
b9
71
72
7i
70
MK
CD
04
03
01
06
03
03
06
02
03
16
04
03
03
03
01
10
01
04
03
MAKE
OLOS
CHLV
bUlC
FoRu
CMEV
CHEV
FORL)
CADI
CHEV
VOLK
OLDS
CMEv
CHEV
CMEV
bUlC
000ft
BUlC
OLDS
CHtv
MODEL
OELT
CAP*
LESA
HAVE
IMPA
IMPA
MA./E
COnP
IMOA
HEFT
F85C
IMPA
CHFL
CH>-L
SPrc
DA-T
SPKC
NIME
NOVA
CID V
3SO 2
400 2
350 4
200 1
3? 7 4
3RO 2
250 1
4?9 H
350 4
Ql 1
350 4
3? 7 4
2«3 2
2*3 2
3^0 2
2?5 1
350 2
4C.5 4
2SO l
T
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
KGHT
4500
4500
4500
2750
4000
4500
3000
4500
4500
2000
3500
4000
3000
3000
3500
3500
4000
4bOO
3000
RU1P
140
140
140
099
132
140
103
140
140
083
123
120
103
103
123
112
132
140
103
We
61
6?
63
5Q
61
6]
5 P.
59
60
5Q
60
6?
5A
5"
^
5*
55
5 t>
d. s u
3) l)
TIME
-030
(Mt,
-035
060
010
ObO
000
200
040
-100
020
090
0 o 0
0,0
L'lO
-n30
0^0
OHO
UM-I)
SE
12
12
1,
22
12
12
22
12
12
2',,.
12
22
22
22
1-
22
12
1'
22
-------
TABLE 12 IrONT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
ALPHA NO.
ill
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
3lo3
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
013163.
01
01
01
01
01
01
Ui
01
,1
'jl
3lo3
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
31o3
3l63
3163
CAR
f
0019
002U
0021
0022
0023
0024
002b
002b
0027
0028
0030
0031
0033
0034
003b
0036
0037
0038
0039
RUN
tt
0019
0020
0021
0022
0023
C024
002b
002b
0027
00*2
0030
0031
0033
0035
0036
0037
0038
UOJ4
00*U
DATE MOD
YYMMDD YR.
730<*06
730*00
730400
7304Q7
7304Q7
730*07
730407
73040 /
730409
730*10
7304Q9
730*09
730*09
730410
73041G
73041 0
730410
^304,0-
7304) 0
69
67
71
69
71
69
70
71
72
72
72
68
67
72
72
72
66
70
09
UK
CD
05
06
10
06
05
0*
01
06
03
03
03
OB
05
12
06
03
05
06
06
MAKE
PONT
FOKD
DODG
FOKD
PONT
OLDS
HUIC
MF.KC
CHEV
CMEV
CHEv
MERC
PONT
PLYM
Foku
CHEV
PONT
FOftO
FO&D
MODEL
CATA
MIKT
CH4*
COST
SAFA
DELT
ELEC
COHG
MAi.I
NOVA
IMP A
MO'lG
EXFC
FUPY
Lin
MO,,T
TE-P
CO: IN
LTD
CID
4nu
2A9
3*3
3sl
400
3SU
4S5
3S1
3SO
307
3^0
J,,2
400
3^0
400
JSO
3P6
3*1
JQO
V
2
2
2
2
2
2
*
*
2
2
tL
2
2
*
2
2
2
*
^
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
h'GHT
4000
3000
3500
4000
5000
4000
4500
3bOO
3500
3bOO
4bOO
3500
4500
4000
4500
4000
3500
*500
4UOO
RLHP We
132 b?
103 63
123 5Q
132 57
147 bQ
132 6]
140 OS
123 61
123 00
112 54
14U 60
112 5Q
140 60
120 57
140 57
132 b6
112 57
140 56
132 57
D°
80
81
7B
73
7b
78
76
^8
78
Id
11
C5
74
74
/b
7b
/4
M
73
BARM
299b
2996
2987
2983
2983
2984
2986
2983
2996
29b3
2999
2982
2980
29b4
29b5
29bb
29bb
29b.
29bB
C A
8 I
8 '?
8 1
(j 1
8 1
B 1
8 1
a i
8 1
8 1
8 1
8 ?
8 1
8 1
8 !
8 1
8 1
rt •>
8 1
E X
2 1
2 2
2 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
P
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM.
0523^8
063000
033633
044b^b
019143
U449^3
036b43
0122-^3
032008
0110-S9
020992
0737*0
0799?8
02110b
0154*3
Olbb^b
U960S6
0284 3b
05125/
TK
CAP
27
16
21
25
^3
25
25
^U
19
16
23
^0
27
23
22
1H
22
25
^
IDLE
RRM
US 00
U440
0/40
0380
0780
0490
05bO
ObOO
03bO
Ob60
04bO
Ob*0
Ob80
ObOO
0600
0 3 / 0
0430
U b 0 0
0600
G DWELL
1 311
1 2.3ii
2 240
2 2^0
2 2^b
2 2:^0
2 2"-.b
2 310
2 2^0
1 2^0
2 2^
2 320
2 2nr>
2 9^
1 2SS
1 27t>
i ?MI
2 3;jo
2 2?J
TIME SE
0 b 0 1 /
1 Ob 2^
ObO 1-
020 [f.
105 1;^
OiJO I;'
0^0 1,
-1/80 !<•
0 9 0 1 2
100 2^
ObO 1^
-0.0 22
0 o C) 1 1-
-o
-------
FAbLE id (TONT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
TAR
ALPHA KO. »
013163 0040
013163 0041
013163 0042
U13163 0043
013163 0044
013163 004b
(J13163 004b
013163 0047
013163 0047
J13163 004H
013163 0049
013163 0050
Ol3lb3 0051
013163 00b2
ul3163 0052
013163 0053
013163 0054
013163 0055
013103 UObb
RUN
0041
0043
0044
004b
0046
00<*7
0048
0196
K 0198
0050
0051
0054
0053
0055
R 0062
0056
0057
00b8
020b
DATE
YYMMDD
73041
7J04]
7304J
73041
73041
73041
73041
73050
0
u
1
1
2
2
2
7
7305Q9
73041
73041
93041
73041
7304]
73041
7304]
7 1041
73041
7305]
2
2
3
2
3
4
3
*
J
8
MOD
YR.
72
68
70
72
71
69
70
71
71
6b
70
67
72
70
7o
66
67
07
72
MK
CD
15
06
04
01
04
12
10
05
05
03
06
05
16
03
03
06
09
04
05
MAKE
TOYO
FORD
OLDS
BUlC
OLDb
PLYM
DoUb
PONT
PONT
CnEV
FOKO
PONT
VOLK
CHEv/
CHEv/
•FOP.)'
CHKY
OLU*
P.lNf
MODEL
LT™
CUTL
CE >i
v/lsT
VAt 1
POL A
SAF.
SAP A
IMP*
MUST
TEK-u
041 1
CHFL
CHFL
MlKT
•ME.,P
VI, 7
CATA
CID
IPO
3-30
3^0
^b
350
2?5
318
.00
400
233
302
326
10*
307
307
2*9
3*3
3 *0
«*on
V T
4 1
2 1
4 i
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 3
2 1
d 1
0 1
* 1
2 1
2 1
H 1
2 1
* 1
KGHT.
2750
4500
3bOO
*500
4500
2750
4000
5000
5000
4000
3000
3500
2500
4000
4000
3000
4500
4000
4bOO
RLHP W°
099 bS
140 bfS
123 5*
140 '55
140 5^
103 b^
120 b*.
147 63
147 70
120 57
113 5*
112 b*
094 60
132 5^
132 5H
103 5*
140 57
132 57
14U 5"
D°
72
'5
to
74
70
71
71
78
78
73
74
74
76
75
77
75
76
76
72
BARM
2960
2986
2987
2989
2981
2930
2976
3012
298b
2976
2980
3015
2988
JO 10
3030
3010
3012
3012
2976
C
8
a
8
a
8
b
a
a
8
8
a
a
*
a
a
a
a
a
a
A E
;• 1
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
? 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 2
1 2
•> i
] 2
1 2
>> 2
1 2
i 2
] 1
X
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
P
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM.
U 13441
065723
0436? 7
OP70MH
U439S1
033283
047892
044336
U445?9
11 7837
U37u,b
105J,0
0054^3
U4l2r!3
041300
u 393 16
048b«0
0 767^-7
Olbyj*
TK
CAP
13
^5
20
^5
dO
18
24
23
23
20
22
22
13
22
22
16
25
24
26
IDLE
RPM
0600
ObOO
ObOO
0680
0580
Ob80
ObOO
0740
07^0
0640
0620
ObBO
08bO
0340
0340
ObUO
ObOO
0610
062b
G
2
2
2
1
1
1.
1
2
2
2
1
1
I
1
1
1
2
1
1
DWELL
045
27b
320
290
275
375
305
2 M)
26 u
250
260
3
-------
TAHLL Id (TONT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
rip
ALPHA NO. *
0:i31bJ 00b7
0.13163 00b8
0-13163 0059
U13163 0060
013163 0061
013163 0062
013163 0063
OJ.3163 0064
013163 006b
013163 0066
013163 006?
013163 0069
013163 0070
Cl3163 0071
013163 0072
013163 0073
C J Ji6.3 GO?'*
r, 1. j j 6 3 0073
..) 1 -J i o 3 0076
RUN DATE MOD
0 YYMMDD . YR.
0066 73041b 70
0061 73041^ 69
0063 73041b 70
006H 730415 69
006b 73041.b 7k!
0067 7304]b 70
0068 730416 66
0070 730411 67
0071 730417 Id
0072 73041 / 71
00/3 73041 1 71
0074 730418 66
007b 730^18 70
0076 7304]8 72
0077 7.J0418 71
007h 730410 71
0079 730418 6H
0080 730^|fa 6fa
0081 730418 72
MAKE MODEL
lb TOYO CO^L
16 VOLK -HEFT
06 F0*l> LTD
3
ob PONT TEMP
06 FORD TOPI
ob PONT L.EMA
04 OLDS JETS
16 VOLK BE- I
16 VOLK 4EFT
16 VOLK 4EF'T
16 VOLK KAi-'M
03 CHEV HEl «
13 AMC JAVE
01 Hi) 1C CEMT
it3 CHEV BEi a
06 FOUU conN
()h FOPO MLKT
03 CHEv CHFL
;)3 CHLV VEr,A
CID
71
Ql
351
350
302
350
310
a 2
Q'f
Ql
a 7
2*3
304
<+5b
350
3m
2*9
3 07
lAO
V
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
q.
2
£
2
(L
2
T
i
4
1
1
1
1
1
ij,
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<+
KCHT
2000
2000
4000
3500
3500
4000
4000
2000
2250
2000
2000
4bOO
3500
4bOO
4000
4500
JOOO
3500
2500
RLHP
083
083
132
123
112
132
120
083
097
083
083
127
112
140
132
140
113
112
094
W"
60
57
5"
b«
60
60
b«
6?
6?
6?
01
60
6?
6?
0?
6v
63
6?
6?
D°
80
7b
7b
77
79
80
76
/b
74
74
73
71
73
77
76
77
76
/4
76
BARM C
3040 <+
30J4 4
3043 8
3043 8
3046 8
3038 8
3031 8
3022 4
3020 4
30 lb 4
30 lb 4
3016 8
3016 8
3014 «
3014 8
3014 8
3013 8
J013 b
3013 4
A E
•> 2
s 2
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 2
? 2
1 1
y 1
-> 1
? 2
^ 2
1 1
1 1
i 1
1 2
> 2
,•- 1
X
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
p
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM.
0216^0
059J52
U173T2
0590h9
008191
030300
058/07
(•85710
005004
0326-^6
039558
116453
036375
Gl^b95
023705
u225a2
075^76
(J^'i J^^l
0109-9
TK
CAP
13
10
25
22
23
20
^5
10
10
10
10
20
19
25
24
20
16
20
11
IDLE
RPM
0-S30
1000
0340
0480
0420
0430
0395
1000
0780
0900
C780
0470
Ob<+G
06HO
Ot>80
OnbO
0320
OHVO
OHHil
G DWELL
1 500
2 420
1 33o
1 290
1 295
1 270
1 2"0
2 63r>
2 4KO
2 4^0
2 520
1 2.J.U
1 240
2 2'-'0
1 27b
2 3 v 0
i 3?0
1 2^u
2 2':'o -
TIME
'J 2 0
075
OoO
040
060
OoG
OoG
100
000
075
0 0 (J
000
ObO
02d
081)
1 00
OoO
12(,
> 1'J'i
SE
22
22
1,
U:
22
1 ,-•
22
22
22
2,'
2/^
22
22
12
\r
1,:
1,
22
'd<-
-------
lAhLt id. (fONT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
ALPHA NO.
'Jl
ul
ul
01
01
ol
0 1
3163
3lo3
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
013163
01
01
01
3163
316.3
3163
013163
ol
01
01
01
Ol
i.l
<;1
3163
3163
J163
J163
3163
3163
J163
CAR
t
0077
0078
0079
OObu
0081
0082
0083
0084
0084
008b
0085
0086
0087
oUbb
0089
009U
0091
0092
UU^3
RUN
»
0082
0083
0084
OObb
0086
0087
0094
0089
R 009b
0090
K 0097
0091
0092
0093
0098
0100
0101
Olu2
0103
DATE
YYMMDD .
7 J041 V
73U419
730419
73041V
730419
730*19
7jO*20
730*19
730420
7304|9
7304PO
7304?0
730420
730*20
7 3 0 * 2 U
73042*
7304?4
7 JU*2*
730*2*
MOD
YR.
'Id
71
67
71
72
71
72
72
72
67
67
71
71
71
72
67
7u
6«
'Id
UK
CD
Ob
06
12
01
10
06
13
06
06
03
03
03
06
03
10
06
12
u3
06
MAKE
PONT
FQPU
PLYM
BuIC
DODG
FoWl)
AMC
FOP.O
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
FOWI)
CHE.v/
UOLHi
F ORL)
PLYM
CHLV
Foku
MODEL CID v
Fl'Jf JSO d.
PI-T 08 1
FU^Y 3)82
ESTA *sb *
POL A 3AO d.
MA\/f 2QU 1
HO"N 258 1
GAI..A 3^1 2
GA| A 3^,1 d
H£|> 2«3 2
HEl. A 2«3 2
MOMT 3^0 2
COi Id JS1 2
CHPL 3^0 2
Sdf\> 225 1
ClK T 3"JU 2
DUsT 2?5 1
•^ELA 3 o 7 d.
10x1 351 d.
T
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
KGHT
3500
225U
4000
5500
4000
2750
3000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4500
3000
3000
4000
3000
*000
*UUU
RUIP
123
U88
120
153
132
099
103
132
132
132
120
120
127
103
113
132
103
120
132
W
61
6?
62
63
63
6*
63
6ft
60
64
OH
50
61
n?
50
30
60
60
5^
D"
72
7*
74
76
77
79
73
77
72
75
70
69
71
/*
71
72
73
77
7^
BARM
301*
3014
3014
3014
3012
3012
301 7
3011
301 7
3011
3021
3011
3015
301 7
3022
2976
2976
2976
2977
C
8
*
8
8
8
b
b
8
8
8
8
b
8
8
b
8
b
8
b
A E
1 1
1 1
1 2
1. 1
1 1
? 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
; 1
1 1
1. 2
3 2
- 2
I 1
X P
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
1 1
1 1 .
1 1
1 1
f1. 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
ODOM.
016277
u 24554
068 9.'* 2
034441
b069ib
U27301
023735
U23H19
023830
UH9423
089* ;^8
0186J8
031177
03J238
Ou5l'-.2
U7*"*7
iJ 1 6 1 M *
058651
0 153 12
TK
CAP
17
11
25
23
d.1
13
16
22
22
24
2*
19
2?
19
16
25
18
d.*
dU
IDLE
RP.M
U620
0780
U6bO
UbhO
0480
0420
0520
0*20
0*20
05t>0
0550
0610
ObbO
0^50
0800
U6HU
08UO
0620
05*0
G
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
DWELL TIME
2'->2 12'i
*00 i*!.l
2 7 u 200
315 DUO
9W 000
3 3 0 0/0
310 0*U
2 6 U U -3 0
2*U Oo()
260 060
2^0 UM)
3SU 02.fi
21-5 2UU
300 0-)d
* 1 !j 000
3 1 0 1 '-• (j
3^u 0«0
27U -0-)!'
252 10U
SE
12
22
d.r!
12
1^
22
ds
if
12
1'
2c'
22
'd?
22
1,'
1
22
22
1,.
-------
TABLE I'd. (CONT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
ALPHA NO.
013163
013lb3
01
0 1
01
ol
01
\ji 0 1
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
U13163
ol
01
Ol
J163
3163
3163
013163
01
01
01
01
Ol
01
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
3163
CAR
00'->.4
0095
0096
0097
0098
0099
0100
0101
0102
0103
0104
0105
0106
0107
0108
'J109
0110
0111
0111 ^
RUN
#
0104
0105
0106
0107
0108
0109
0110
0138
0116
0113
0114
Ollb
0117
0118
0129
0134
021b
0122
» 0133
DATE
YYMMDD
7304P4
7304P4
7304?5
73Q4?b
730425
73042b
7304^8
7J0426
73o4?b
7304^5
7304P5
7304P6
730426
730427
730427
73062V
73042b
730427
MOD
YR.
66
66
70
71
69
69
69
70
68
70
68
67
71
67
71
72
72
72
72
UK
CD
Ol
10
06
17
03
01
03
16
06
Ob
03
08
14
01
07
04
03
12
!2
MAKE
buic
DOUG
FORO
OPEL
CHEV
buic
CHEV
VOLK
FOHIJ
PONT
CHEV
MEKC
DATS
BUIC
LINC
OLDS
CHEV
P(_YM
PLYM
MODEL
LE ^ A
PQl A
FAJP
GT.
NOVA
ELEC
TOl/fh
SQi.lA
TOPI
CATA
CAoR
COMM
blO
SPFC
COMT
4*2
IMPA
UlKl
DIKT
CID
340
302
116
210
410
3SO
Q7
2*9
400
3o6
300
07
300
4M)
4sb
3^0
3ld
318
V T
d 1
2 1
2 1
2 4
1 3
4 1
4 1
1 1
2 1
2 1
4 1
2 1
2 4
2 1
4 1
4 4
2 1
2 i
2 1
wan
4000
40UO
3bOO
2250
2000
4500
4500
2250
3500
4500
4000
4bOO
22bO
4500
5000
3500
4500
3000
3000
RLHP
132
132
112
088
083
140
140
088
112
140
132
140
088
140
147
123
140
103
103
W°
60
60
60
6(1
5Q
6?
61
60
6?
6?
6?
63
61
6]
63
61
bft
b,
64
D°
74
74
71
70
75
74
75
72
73
73
74
72
72
73
75
7b
7b
7b
BARM
2977
2977
2977
2977
29/7
2978
2476
2938
2964
2969
2972
2972
2964
2966
29J5
2923
2971
29bb
2923
C
8
8
8
4
b
o
8
4
ti
d
8
d
4
8
,H
8
d
d
o
A E
i 2
? 2
? 2
? 1
'-> 2
1 2
i 2
1 2
1 2
i 2
] 2
? ?
-> 1
1 2
1 1
- 1
1 1
1 1
] 1
X
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
P
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ODOM.
071913
07841V
040038
021609
042108
U93bs9
o8b2SO
042557
05577b
0260^8
062556
054VM
032616
042014
017170
030 748
010M67
'.I 0 8 M u I
GOb«i-3
TK
CAP
25
25
d.2
12
18
25
24
10
2C
26
24
20
12
20
^4
*3
<3
ID
Ib
IDLE
RPM
0630
05*0
0580
OvOO
0540
0450
0680
0500
0630
0630
0320
0530
0480
ObOO
0540
1100
OV75
0*70
04 70
G
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
DWELL TIME SE
1 ? 0 17*1 I/
2l'JlJ 075 ic
2?b 030 22
560 020
-------
TAbLE 12 (TOIMT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
CAR RIJN DVTC MOD »1K TK IDLE
AlPIU NO. 0 ™" YYMMDD YR. CD m** MODEL CID V T raiT RLHP w* D° BARM C A E X P °DOM' CAP RPM G DWELL TIME SE
013163 0112 0123 730420 70 09 CHRY >\iE,'Y 4^0 4 1 <+50u 140 6"> 75 2969 a ! ?. 1 1 060709 24 Oo20 1 270 luO 1 c
013lb3 0113 0124 Y304?b 66 02 CADI CAl. A 47^: H 1 5000 147 64 /6 2969 8)211 030211 26 05/0 1 27n OfO 12
013163 0113 R 0132 730427 68 02 CADI CA|_A H72 4 1 5000 147 61 /4 2923 61211 030247 26 Oo70 1 270 OHI; 1 ,•_
013163 0114 0125 7304P7 66 05 PQNT LE^A 3SO 2 1 3500 112 61 75 2969 61211 u36273 19 0640 1 2rt.O .0/0 22
013163 0115 C126 730^27 66 10 DQDG CO^u 316 2 1 4000 120 6? 74 2963 6 | 2 1 1 130916 19 0600 1 310 -O2b 22'
U13163 Ollb 0127 730427 o9 Qb FORu GA|.A 3fi2 eL 1 4000 132 bl 72 2941 81211 062643 25 08/0 1 230 3UU 1^
013lb3 0117 0126 730427 69 03 CH£V MA|. I 3i)7 2 1 3500 112 60 /I 2934 a l 2 1 1 04199'9 20 U560 1 2MI OHO 2?
013163 0116 0130 7304?7 70 03 CHEV IM^A 3'^U 2 1 4000 132 61 74 2923 8 | 2 1 1 u5ollO 25 0600 1 2M> -0^0 12
Ol31b3 0119 0131 73u4?7 66 Q3 CHEv CHl-2 1^4 1 3 3000 103 b? /2 2923 b ;> 2 2 1 070776 16 0/80 2 23u -100 22
Ol31b3 0120 0135 7304?6 69 02 CADI FLFt 4?2 4 1 5000 147 64 75 2924 6)211 117143 26 0630 1 2^0 0/b 12
013163 0121 0136 73042W 71 12 PLYM VAu1 2?5 1 1 3000 103 6^ /6 2923 6)111 022697 18 Ob20 2 v9H 020 22
C13163 0122 0137 7304P8 66 12 ^LYM BEl.h! 2?5 1 1 35oO 112 56 68 2934 6 ? 2 2 1 0793^5 19 0/40 2 390 025 22
U13163 0123 0139 7304?6 68 09 CHRY NE-vP 3«3 21 4500 140 60 75 2939 6 ] 2 1 1 060200 eL* 0620 2 300 u/b 1,:
013163 0124 0140 730426 69 06 FnRO FALC 200 1 3 2500 094 6] /6 2942 b ? 2 1 1 0581 J 3 io 0580 2 2vM.i ui(> 2^
Gl31b3 0126 0142 730429 70 16 VOL* SOU A ^7 1 4 2500 094 b9 75 2990 <+ ~- 2 1 1 031315 10 U8/b 2 bOO 0->0 2^-
Ol3lb3 0127 0143 7JU429 6-S 13 AMC rtA ..h< 212 1 1 3000 103 59 75 2990 o -> 2 2 1 09237/ 16 Ob40 2 ?-IL OOU 2
013163 U128 0144 73u42^ 69 04 Ol.US Du. T 4S5 d 1 4000 132 5Q 76 2990 O ) 2 1 1 06b304 2b 0/00 1 210 Ono 1 <•
Cil3lb3 0129 Ol4b /304?v 70 10 UODti CH".tv j^j 4 1 3500 123 bn 77 2990 a 1 2 1 1 ^606^2 1p. Ob':>0 1 27i; i >*. 1^
)1316.1 0129 K 014M 7j04'iG 7.0 10 DOLM-, CM;\^ 3^3 4 i 3500 123 b? /H 3010 o 1 ? 1 1 (r6Jr,^7 18 ObbO 1 27i.i
-------
I'd
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
.rcus vn CAR RUN DATE MOD MR ....... • TK IDLE
A'-F»A NO. » „ YYMMDD YR. CD "^ MODEL CID V T H'CHT RL1IP H° D" BARM C A E X P ODOM. CAP RRM G DWELL TIME SE
u!31b3 0130 0146 M042V 71 12 P|_YM VAi I 3]a 2 1 300oH3 61 78 2990 a ) 1 1 1 i.'lbSMB 1H GbOO'2 2 Hi uOO 1,-
013163 0130 R 01<+7 730^30 71 12 P|_YM VAl 1 3ld 2 1 3000 113 ^z /3 3010 a } 1 1 1 0159Sb l* ir^OO 1 2'S'» UOi. is
013163 0131 01«*8 730430 67 03 C^tV CHt-"2 283 t 3 27bO 099 b« 760 2 2^0 Ob'J 2,.'
013163 013b Olo3 730503 67 03 Cn£V rtl^C 2SO 1 3 4000 120 6=: t<+ 2989 o ^ ? 2 1 0721-»J 20 OtsOO 2 30J U20 22
013163 0136 0154 730501 69 06 F()RO MUM 3f)2 2 1 3000 113 08 81 3009 a | 2 1 1 06^4^d 25 06^0 2 2/0 0^0 !<•
U13163 0137 0155 73o5(i3 6^ 06 FOHu TH.IN 3-0 d 1 4bOO 12V 6S 75 294b 8 i 2 2 1 0632?* ^2 u4bO 1 2SS 1 1 >! 2^
013163 0138 Olb6 730503 67 Q3 CHEV MA| I 283 2 1 3bOO 112 6fl 7b 2980 8 i 2 2 1 0^3102 20 O^tbO 1 2^0 0-+0 2?
Cl3lb3 0139 0157 730503 71 ^6 FOPU COi iM ^00 4 1 f500 140 6S /6 2996 o ] 1 1 1 0223^4 22 03HO 1 2^-b n*5 1 .:;
013163 0140 0158 730503 70 08 MFKC C0l>0 3R1 ^ 1 3bOO 123 6S 7b 2991 8)211 058b9^ 21? 06^0 1 2'-o lr>0 1 ,;
Gl3lb3 UlHl 0159 7305Q3 72 1^ DATS 5]0 ^7 2 1 2250 088 6S f5 2988 «+ P 1 1 1 Jl4v2b 12 Ob^+0 2 5'fUi O.T(I 2.-;
013163 01^2 0160 730503 72 12 PL.YM fU^vy 3]8 2 1 ^000 132 6S /3 2987 61111 026669 23 0720 2 2*U u^n 1 ,'
013163 dlH3 L-161 730503 6S< 03 CHEV MAI..I 30/ ^ 1 3bOO 123 6S /2 2986 d 1 2 1 1 'j<^29 leL tu 06-^0 2 2>'U U20 1^;
013163 0143 R o!9b 730507 6S 03 C^tv/ ^Ail 3n / 2 1 3bOO 123 61 ^ 3012 H 1 2 1 1 '.)43i;'W 2u OouO'2 2-^J uuO I,-
^13163 0144 0162 730bdJ 72 03 CHtv/ r^I-'(5 <*<>d * 1 bOOO 147 6S 73 29t!3 o | 1 1 1 jlb^-o £ .') unfO 1 2-t-J u^:', 1 ,:
0131o3 0146 0175 73050b 71 03 CHtv VE^A laO 1 4 27bO 109 brJ M 29a2 <+ 1 1 1 1 G32«'-.o 11 i)/0u 2 2Su Ooo l ,-
013163 01^8 Olbb 73050J 72 06 FOR" TO-1 30^; <; 1 ^CiOU 12U oi. /3 29«U o -• 1 1 i ulOoih ^2 OariC i 300 Un1.- i ,-
0131b3 01^*9 0109 73o5i)M. 71 15 TOYO COyL 71 1 3 2000 OH3 b^ /b 29aO ^ ' 1 i 1 'j]4b>b 1 (\ Ob-su ^ D.MJ -iO'i
-------
TAdLE. 1
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
ALPHA NO. C»R
013163 0150
013163 0151
013163 0152
013163 0153
013163 0154
013163 0155
013163 0156
Q13163 0158
013163 0159
013163 0160
013163 0161
013163 0162
(,13163 0163
013163 0164
013163 016b
013163 0166
u13163 0167
013163 0168
^13163 0169
RUN DATE MOD MK
» YYMMDD . YR. CD
0170 730504 66 06
0171 73050<* 68 12
0172 730504 69 10
0173 730504 71 01
0174 730505 70 04
0176 730505 70 12
0177 730505 68 06
0179 730506 72 06
0180 7305C6 66 05
0181 730506 69 08
0182 730506 69 12
0183 730506 72 09
0184 730506 70 03
0185 730506 71 03
0186 730500 67 13
0187 /30506 68 ()3
0188 730506 66 06
0189 73050? 6b 06
0190 730507 72 06
MAKE
FnRi)
PLYM
DODfi
dillC
OLDS
PLYM
FORD
FQKU
PONT
MERC
PLYM
CHR.Y
CHEV
CHtV
AMC
CHt-V
MERC
FQRO
FORD
MODEL
MIKT
FUDY
POl.. A
SKYL
9H
FU-vY
CUST
COiiM
CAT A
MOMY
SlMU
iMEwrY
CAMA
MALI
AMr«A
BEL A
MO'^'H
CO!'M
PI'-'T
CID
200
318
3R3
3SU
4^5
3)8
240
4(jO
3fi9
390
343
460
3SO
30 /
3^3
2RO
3QO
3*0
1?2
V
i
2
2
2
4
d.
2
2
4
2
D°
75
/4
7b
74
n
n
12
72
72
12
/5
75
75
71
68
74
Y4
15
73
BARM C
2980 6
2980 8
2977 8
2976 8
2980 8
2985 8
2985 b
2985 8
2985 8
298b 8
2999 8
2998 8
2999 8
2995 8
3000 8
3001 6
3000 M
30 ..I'.- ••>
3000 H
A E
-> 2
1 2
I 2
1 1
1 2
] ?
? 2
\ 1
? 2
y 2
1 2
1 1
f 2
1 1
1 2
] ?
? ?.
1 2
' 1
X
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
i
1
i
P
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
I
1
1
TK
ODOM. CAP
0756*6 16
0899.13 24
055010 2t
023409 ^5
053571 25
0627 Jb ^4
U422S4 ^5
u!7971 22
082312 27
0561) /y 24
051410 22
015213 £3
030611 19
028376 15
Ob60(i« 22
D69419 d*
'jH38'"'9 ^5
<;6c: Ji.'o ^U
!,'31Viu 11
IDLE
RPM
0^40
04bO
0520
0680
ObOO
0430
0530
0460
0640
0460
0540
0640
OddO
04bO
ObOO
0690
Ub80
Obnu
^00
G DWELL
1 3?i>
1 270
2 315
2 2^G
2 340
1 295
1 4lb
i 2Sb
1 210
1 2 So
2 ?^0
2 2Sb
2 31 ':)
1 26^
0 2)0
7 r-'i
2 2P.ii
J <;<<••
l -3.--d
TIME SE
UO tfi
-U'T'.I 2<*
U 0 G 2 f'
120 Id
UoO I,-
0 0 G 1 d
0^0 2<"
U 6 0 1 e'
080 2^
120 1*
0 3 U 1 <
1 U 0 1 C
-o^ii 2^:
1 J i) 1 ?
1)20" Id
OuO 2>
0/0 1 >
l^f. 1-.
U d U S i'
-------
TABLE
(TOUT.)
VEHICLE INFORMATION SUMMARY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
ALPHA NO.-
J 131 63
(l
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3i
3
3
b3
163
1
63
3163
3
3
3
3
163
1
1
1
63
63
63
CAR
0170
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
&
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
71
Id
73
74
7b
76
77
78
T* YYMMDD YR. CD ^KE MODEL CID v T WGHT RLHP w* D° BARM C A E X P ODOM. CAp RpM G DWELL TIME SE
0191 7J0507 70 06 Ff)RO MA\/t 200 1 3 2750 099 h? 73 3008 '6 1211 02J510 1 o OD<-tO d 410 0^+0 d.(>_
Ols»2 730507 68 13 AMC RAMb 212 1 1 3000 103 6? I'd 3010 b t 2 1 1 0322^0 ^2 0470 1 270 Oyd 1 ,-
0194 730507 68 01 rtl.jIC SKvL 400 * 1 4000 132 61 71 3010 8(211 0526»J ^0 04,fU 2 31o UOO \?
0197 730509 70 03 CMtV CAop 400 2 1 4500 140 69 7b 2984 « 1 2 1 1 0304^6 2b 0640 2 300 O^b 1>
0200 730511 72 08 MF.RC MOMG 351 2 1 4000 132 63 77 2963 8 1 1 I'l 013008 20 0640 1 2*d OMJ 1^
0201 730511 66 16 VoLK HEFT 7S 1 4 2000 083 61 77 29b3 t P 2 2 1 051790 10 1050 2 *+70 100 df.
0202 730515 67 10 DOLHi C0u>0 3lB 2 1 3500 112 6S ^3 2996 d ^ 2 2 1 110073 19 06bO 2 235 U<: <^^
0203 f305]5 67 06 FQRD MUST 2HV ^ 1 2750 09V 6^ 75 2996 tt P 2 2 1 137^,:4 17 0600 ^ <^0 0-*(.' ^f
730515 71 03 CHtV IMPA 3^0 2 1 4500 140 65 /b 29V6 8 1 1 1 1 l)41's?4 d4 0660 1 .300 0^0 ir
-------
TAbLt 13A
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST KESDLTS IM GR.lMbA/lLL
WASHINGTON* O.C.
1972 FEDERAL TLST
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
oo 0006
o
0007
0004
0009
0010
0011
0012
0013
G013 R
0014
0015
0016
0017
C018
Yf.AP
1972
1*71
1'370
1970
1-568 .
1972
1471
1966
1469
1968
1968
1^67
14&6
1966
1969
1971
l->72
1^71
1 -70
MAKE
OLDS
CHEV
BUIC
F ORJ
CHEV
CHEV
FORD
CADI
CHEv/
VOLK
OLDS
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
*UIC
DODG
HU1C
OLDS
CHEV
CIO
3bO
400
350
2UO
327
350
250
429
350
91
350
327
283
283
350
225
35^
^55
250
HC
^.55
3.51
u.ll
4.68
5.86
2.76
3.03
7.09
<+.<+4
4.37
5.77
8.39
26.01
15.51
2.93
3.33
2.30
3.^9
2. Mi
CO
99. 30
55. ?b
B5.10
40. I'*
7d.39
39. 3b
40 .^3
98. 2b
bl.Hf
o7. 15
01.^7
92. PO
n7.^U
28.76
69. ?3
49. al
36.8?
<+O.S5
^b.03
Cn2
blO. 72
588.^-3
^*9S.43
303.15
419. HO
67<5.->2
38?. ^3
^99. 42
517. ?b
280.85
b3fl.:3l
424.16
358.96
21S.S2
5<*?.H5
37^.^2
728.50
763. \^
441.^3
NO
3.^0
4.~s6
3.^2
2.b2
3.49
3. S3
5.,il
3.?b
5.43
1. 16
4. 14
3.78
3.78
H.?2
• 3 . ot<
4 . ;•; 0
3.31
4. (i5
»
2 . ret
N02
1 .06
1.02
.79
.74
1.28
.92
1.47
1.37
2.78
. 16
1.55
1.17
1.33
.51
1.03
2.11
.90
1 .26
.85
NOX
4.26
5.38
4.11
3.3b
4.78
4.45
6.98
4.66
d.21
1.51
5.68
4.95
5.10
2.72
4.71
6.41
H.21
5.31
3.73
MOXC
4.00
5.07
3.97
3.23
4.43
4.24
6. 18
4.15
7.23
"1.36
5.25
4.75
4.47
2.52
4.03
5.58
3.59
4.65
3.47
ICO
U.75
G.89
U.OU
1 .28
3.86
2.30
3.99
7.6U
4 .66
5.26
U.78
9.31
3.78
3.68
1 .83
5.1U
0.19
C.68
3.99
FUEL
iECONi
Ilo4
12.9
* 13,8
23.3
15.8
11.9
19.5
13»1
13.9
22,2
13.7
14,7
17,2
28.6
13.4
19. li
11.2
10,6
16. .9
-------
13A
cx>
EXHAUST t-MISSION TEST RESULTS IM (,R'.Mb/wlLE
w/ASHlM.TONN O.r...
1472 FEDERAL TEST o
ICLE
MdER
0019
0020
0021
0022
0023
0024
0025
0026
0027
0028
0030
0031
0033
0034
0035
0036
0037
0038
0039
YF AR
1969
1Q67
1-371
1959
1971
1969
Iv70
1971
1972
ls»72
1972
1968
1^67
1^72
1972
1972
1^66
IQ7U
l'=»69
MAKE
PON 1
FORO
DOUG
FORD
PONT
OLDS
BOIC
MERC
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
MERC
PONT
PLYM
FORD
CHEV
PONT
FORO
FORD
CID
400
289
383
351
400
350
455
351
350
307
3bO
302
400
360
400
350
326
351
390
HC
5.18
12.16
5.35
3.04
6.09
5.57
5.66
3.16
4.59
2.44
3.34
4.16
7.66
5.17
3.38
3.05
3.99
4.73
5. 54
CO
70. ^b
157.40
142.30
40. ?9
39.53
125.45
89.Q4
54. 55
77.19
9.11
47.
-------
TAbLt 13ft' (CONT.)
fc;XHAUST EMISSION TbSl RESULTS IM GRAMS/'-'lLt
WASHINGTON* OoC.
1472 FEDERAL TEST ^
VEHICLE
NUMdER
0040
0041
0042
0043
0044
Co
fo 0045 ,
0046
0047
0047 R
0048
0049
0050
0051
0052
0052 R
005J
0054
005b
0056
YFAR
1*72
1968
1970
1972
1971
1969
1970
1971
1*71
1966
1970
1967
1*72
1*70
1970
1*66
1*67
1*67
1472
MAKE
TOYO
FORD
OLUS
RUIC
OLUS
PLYM
DODG
PONT
PONT
CHEV
FORD
PONT
VOLK
CHEV
CHLV
FORU
CHRY
OLDS
PONT
CID
120
390
350
455
350
225
318
400
400
283
302
326
102
307
307
289
383
3JO
400
HC
2.39
6.37
5.48
3.70
5.01
3.05
6.05
4.12
4.26
17.50
3.44
15.51
2.38
5.35
3.91
7.13
6.40
6.64
2.43
CO
26.49
115.70
95.71
51. Ob
67.12
47.33
80.35
39.85
39. SO
130.15
34.26
78. ?8
11.77
80. ? 1
20. e^
102.39
107.50
121.83
30.98
C02 NO
35«.32 3.1h
585.26 3.7()
492. ?0 3.04
9Ub.»s4 5.?6
770 •*! 4.69
359.58 4.?5
505. «7 3.33
715.43 4.60
729.60 4.02
360.1)7 2.26
536.49 2.47
540.^0 4.^8
32h.vl 2.29
461. j6 3.ii7
403. 78 3.72
J84.05 4.19
452.76 2.M3
533.H8 2. -8
/ry?Vu6 * 2.^7
N0
-------
I ABl t 13fl (.CftN! . )
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN
D.C.
1972 FfcOEPAL TEST
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0057
0058
0059
0060
0061
OD 0062
UJ
0063
0064
0065
0066
0067
0069
0070
0071
0072
0073
U074
00/5
0 J76
YF-*.
1970
1969
1970
1969
•1972
1970
1966
1967
1972
1971
1971
1966
1Q70
1972
1971
1971
1968
1V6S
1972
MAKt
c
TOYO
V/OLK
FORD
PONT
FORD
PONT
OLDS
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
VOLK
CHEV
AMC
»UIC
CHEV
rORU
FCP-U
CHEV
CMEV
CID
71
91.
351
350
302
350
330
92
97
97
97
283
304
455
350
351
289
3u7
140
HC
2.00
3.95
3.91
3.65
2.27
3.93
13.27
4.59
3.75
4.73
3.33
8.42
4.65
2.03
3.71
3.06
9.31
5.87
4.24
CO
12
14
23
46
24
b6
154
52
34
29
36
134
43
• 23
33
29
57
91
36
.77
. l«
.41
.54
.Ob
.41
.07
.QO
.So
.97
.29
.h7
.UB
.47
.R6
.61
.07
.75
.hi
C02
255
254
581
477
598
527
429
169
295
192
282
432
507
747
574
602
401
378
-J55
• ?o
.48
.59
.M5
.10
.76
.13
• 06 ,
.62
.,18
.14
.?3
• ' t3
.04
.H4
.?6
.1*
.96
.S2
NO
3.97
2. 16
5.43
4.48
3.32
3.Q9
1.62
1.1*
2.. 12
1.61
1.P9
2.?3
3 . (i 0
3.11
4.^0
4.72
2.*7
1.17
l.^b
N02
1.44
.65
2.29
1.85
.92
1.39
.18
.13
.39
.23
.23
.37
.58
.61
1.10
1.67
.44
.35
.31
NO A
5.41
3.01
7.72
6.32
4.24
5.38
1.81
1.27
2.71
1.85
2.12
2.60
3.59
3.92
5.30
6.40
3.12
1. 72
2.27
•'•OAC
4. 76
2.b9
6. 74
5.b7
3. 70
4. 74
1.57
1.20
2.58
1 .66
1.99
2.4b
3.44
3.78
4.93
b.95
2.96
1 .6 Li
2.17
ICO
1 .83
2.21
0.01
2.97
3.C7
5.79
2.78
6.52
3.88
3.78
1.93
3.57
0.82
1.00
C .U6
1.37
5.93
3.99
0.28
FUEL
ECON
31.5
30.7
14.1
15.8
13.8
14.1
, 12.4
33.3
24.5
34.9
25.4
13.2
15.0
11.2
13,9
13.5
17.1
16.4
20. ,9
-------
TABLE 13A (CONT.)
EXHAUST EMISSION Tt^T RESULTS IN GR.'.MS/M 1 |_t
WASHINGTON* O.r.
1972 FEOEPAL TEST
OD
VEHICLE
NUMbER
0077
0078
0079
0080
0081
! 0082
0083
0084
0084
0085
0085
0086
0087
0088
oo ay
0090
0091
C092
OC93
Y K /W
1-72
1971
1967
1Q71
1-J72
1-m
1^72
1^72
w 1972
I^b7
ft 1967
I'm
lw71
1^71
19/2
1467
19 /u
I'-iK*
\-i~i£
MAKE
PONT
FORti
PLY-1
HUIC
DOUG
FORD
AMC
FORO
FORu
CrlEV
CHEV
CHEV
FQR.J
CHEV
DOUb
FORD
PLYM
CHEv/
FOR.J
CII)
350
9«
318
455
360
200
258
351
351
2H3
283
350
351
350
225
39u
2?5
307
3ni
HC
5.00
2.70
8,12
3.^7
2.8<+
2.27
1.<*U
1.24
1.32
6.65
8.15
4,56
<*.51
3.53
2.2a
t>.67
2.61
<+.0 /
c ,^'J
CO
113.77
47.66
147.7b
76.79
21.69
18. 9U
1 4 . ) 7
14.o8
23. S2
99.90
1 1^.30
57.49
60. ^1
01.49
*8. 1 J
90.09
51. 2b
bl .^a
1 ^.r>t\
C02
580.06
27 i.3/
368.38
747, *2
642.76
374.Q4
4GO.?3
782.^2
797.73
451.43
62^. U
484.33
o27.«l
500. "I
368. M2
<*»Q.S6
327.Q6
3B9.23
67^. >9
NO
1.^5
3. -)3
1.90
3.tj^
4.^b
4.H5
3 . 0 9
3.65
2.Q7
2.92
3.52
2.42
3.^h
1.H3
3.71
3. ah
J.^2
2 . / 7
"'^. 13
N02
.15
.5H
.23
.78
1.59
1.31
1.2*
.55
.90
.66
1.75
.53
1.19
.29
1.43
1.00
1.45
2.23
1 .48
NOX
2.00
3.57
2.13
4.72
6.55
6. lb
*.33
4.20
3.88
3.58
5.27
2.95
5.18
2.12
3.15
<+.4h
b.07
5.00
S.M.3
MOXC
1.90
3.40
2.03
4.51
6.22
5.89
4.^2
4.37
3.60
3.52
4.77
2. /5
4.96
2.06
4. I'd
4. Oh
4.67
t . 4H
5.26
5
1
2
0
C
1
C
*>
J
n
.1
u
5
3
U
2
2
U
ICO
.26
.16
.02
.50
.C
.09
.19
.09
.0
.57
.32
.66
.99
.13
.149
.97
.10
6.37
•>
V ^
,28 -
FUEL
ECON
11.5
24,9
14,2
1 _0.. 1
12.9
21,6
20,8
11.0
10.5
14.1
10,7
15.1
12.0
14.6
19 ,7
13.6
21.3
18.3
12P5
-------
TAbl. t.
(C'fiNT.->
OO
\s\
EXHAUST F MI SSI ON TEST RESULTS IM
w A ;>HI M-TON • r/.r.
1972 FFOEPiL TEST uPoCM
ICLE
MHEK
0094
0095
0096
0097
0098
0099
UiOO
0101
0102
0103
0104
0105
0106
0107
0108
0109
OiiU
Oil J
Gil: r
YFAW
1966
1966
1970
1971
1969
1969
1069
1970
1908
1^70
1968
1^67
1971
1Q67
1971
JQ/2
1972
1-72
: 197?
MAKE
HIJIC
DODG
FOKD
OPEL
CHEV
BUIC
CHEV
VOLK
FORO
PUNT
CHEV
MERC
DATS
RUIC
LINC
OLUb
CHEV
PLYM
PLYM
CID
340
383
302
116
230
430
350
97
289
400
396
390
97
300
460
455
35U
318
318
HC
12.57
5.02
4.26
2.32
3.24
5.99
5.01
2.69
3.33
4.00
8.43
5.47
2.69
b.52
5.25
*.Su
2.89
*.53
4.95
CO
158.09
93. ul
40. 06
41.82
33.25
82.05
108.^7
38.19
17.36
47.11
150. a 7
73. Q7
14. 41)
128.2^
133.35
32. ^u
42.94
M.97
. 69. 2b
C02
3^2.75
461.23
514.^5
215.79
401.^5
597.17
567.87
294. 18
520. S3
644. ?0
50ft. Qb
577. ft 7
321.^4
441 .79
63S.Q7
864.40
97S. fib
420. 29
02S.V8 :
NO
1.^7
2.Q9
3 . o^t-
1.S7
1 . MA.
4. SO
3.17
3.02
4.C.6
3.i. 0
3.00
5.^1
J . r, ?_
2.M)
2.:-l
2. ]8
3. '14
3.20
3.14
N02
.30
.72
.69
.38
.30
2.42
1.61
.86
1.11
.94
.52
-.34
.67
.63
.33
.25
.71
.65
.7o
NOX
1.87
3.71
3.73
1.95
2.14
b.92
4.98
3.88
5.17
4.39
3.52
b.07
3.69
3.23
2.35
2.43
..05
3.85
3.91
f'OXC
1.70
3.39 .
3.41
1.82
1.97
6.53
4.65
3.53
4.99
4. 19
3.39
4.94
3.48
3. Oh
2.30
2.3^
H.45
3. n
3.84
ICO
11 .32
3.57
0.28
0.10
0.6U
5.93
U.U3
2.11
O.U6
2.02
9.09
2.59
2.78
6 .67
0.37
0.1G
O.C
7.51
7.51
FUEL
ECON
14.1
14.2
15.0
30.7
19.1
11.9
11.8
24.5
15.9
12.1
11.5
12.5
25.1
13.2
1C. 3
9.5
53.8
16.2
16.1
-------
TABLE 134 (CONT.)
EXHAUST EMISSION TtSl RESULTS IN O
WASHINGTON? O.C.
FEDERAL TEST
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0112
0113
0113 R
OllH
0115
co 0116
cr\
0117
0118
0119
0120
0121
0122
0123
0124
0126
0127
U128
0129
0129* K
YEAR
1470
1468
1968
1968
1Q68
1969
1469
1470
1466
1469
1471
1466
IvbB
1969
1^70
I4t>6
1469
Is7g
l*7u
MAKE
CHRY
CADI
CADI
PONT
DODG
FORu
CHEV
CHEV
CHtV
CADI
PLYM
PLfM
CHRY
FORO
VOLK
AMC
OLDS
DODb
DODLi
CID
440
472
472
350
318
302
3u7
350
144
472
225
225
383
200
97
232
455
383
383
HC
3.09
2.07
3,14
3.43
3.70
5.36
5.78
8.25
9.37
3.32
2. HI
3.97
7.39
4.55
4.74
6.28
4.00
16.71
14.64
CO
31.39
42.47
68.99
49.22
52.03
46.02
76.41
156.66
103.95
69.61
5 0 . ^ 0
73. H8
119.0/
/b.hb
35.80
140.31
103. 23
13J.33
1 09.H4
C02
579.. vl
54P.79
753.65
58ft. ?6
423.1 7
530.47
494.57
418.H4
346.32
695.54
353.34
378.66
572.38
310.68
312. «7
33S. ^8
550. 19
49Q.m
47f.V/ "
MO
3.44
2,42
3.13
2.08
2.^3
5.43
4.39
1.S7
2.^5
5.07
3.93
2.57
4. 12
3 . o 1
2.30
1.47
3.^5
3.J /
3. (>4
N02
1.46
.60
.57
.42
.40
2.Hb
1.5B
.22
.56
1.61
1.06
1.29
1.42
1.00
.57
.45
1.45
.44
.47
NJOX
5.
3.
J.
2.
2.
8.
3 .
1.
2.
6.
4.
3.
5.
4.
2.
2.
5.
3.
4.
Q1
02
70
51
99
79
97
79
82
69
94
H6
5H
01
86
42
30
ol
05
MOXC
5. 7d
2.95
3.59
2.41
2.84
8.31
5.54
1. 74
2.72
6.56
4.67
3.54
5.04
3.69
2.55
2.15
4.70
3.24
3. /5
ICO
1 .63
2.88
1 .65
2.11
0.73
2.78
5.66
«.5U
5.39
2.68
4 .1C
5.C2
9.77
7.69
:.C2
5.26
5.93
?.57
^ .U3"
FUEL
ECON
13.9
14.2
10.1
13.1
17.2
14.3
14.0
12.8
16.5
10.9
20,1
17.5
11.3
19.9
23.]
15.4
12.2
11.6
12.8
-------
TAbLt 134, (CONJ..),
EXHAUST EMISSION TfST RESULTS IN GK
rtAt>HlK'i7TON« D.C.
1972 FEDERAL TEST o
1 Lb.
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0130
0130 R
0131
0133
0134
c»
0135
0136
0137
0138
0139
0 0140
0141
0142
0143
0143 R
0144
0146
0148
0149
Yh'AR
19/1
1971
1967
1972
1^68
1967
1969
1966
1967
1971
1970
1972
1972
1969
1969
1972
1 '71
19/2
1Q71
MAKE
PL™
PLYM
CHEV
CADI
PONT
CHEV
FORO
FORO
CHEV
FORD
MERC
DATS
PLYM
CHEv
CHEV
CHEV
CHLV
FORJ
TOYO
C1D
318
31b
2B3
472
400
250
302
390
283
400
351
97
318
307
307
402
14U
302
71
HC
3.41
3.20
21 ,b6
1.32
8.78
7.40
5.28
7.12
15.77
a. 27
3.91
2.16
3.11
5.H2
7.21
1.87
3.45
4.2^
2.25
CO
53.^4
45.21
109.39
13.aU
127.01
87.44
64. 10
121.33
163. 18
73.18
66.12
16.^6
2b.S6
93.21
104. 11
27. d4
28.22
47.3'*
18. 70
C02
466. S7
476.73
349.12
914.95
545.^6
417.76
a3l .43
bM.ll
400.77
65S.?a
>25. MO
303.05
o26. *3
54Q. i 0
494. 70
864.21
35^2
0^7 . O4
.ia,j.*«
NO
2. 75
2.72
l.?4
3.00
1 . ; ; 2
• 1.^4
4. |H
2. la
1.77
4.^3
2.H5
3.^7
4.1 ;2
3..h
3.?2
3.K9
3. -3
3.^a
1.93
N.02
.63
.80
.18
.83
.20
1.54
.39
.4H
1 .63
.63
1.92
1.21
.99
1.07
I.Ob
.70
.8b
.57
NOX
3.38
3.52
1.42
3.82
1.20
2.03
5.6b
2.53
2.21
6.26
3.48
5.59
3.23
4.67
4.29
<+.66
3.7a
«.12
2.51
,OXC
3.07
3. 12
1.25
3.71
1.19
2.06
5.61
2.55
2.36
6.25
3.51
5.63
5.36
4.81
3.85
4.V4
3.43
4. ].d
2.46
ICO
2.C2
2.11
1.57
C.C
6.38
3.88
7.69
7.33
9.77
2.1 1
6.37
U. 32
0.28
5.79
5.93
1 .65
3.0
1 .55
1.18
FUEL
ECON
15.8
15.9
15.0
9.4
11.5
15.3
16.2
11.8
12.5
11.3
13.8
26.4
13.0
12.6
13.0
9.7
21.4
12.1
23.5
-------
! 134 (CON[.)
tXi-iAUST EMISSION TtSF PEb'.JLTb IN GR
WASHINGTON* O.C.
1972 FHiJtHAL Tub! ^R
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0150
00151
0152
C153
u!54
CD
co jib5
015b
0158
0159
OlbO
0161
0162
Clbj
Ulb4
016b
0166
ulb7
71 CHEV
l4t>7 AMC
1468 CHEV
l^,h«S :-!,S4 4.Q8
.58 563.^4 3.45
.80 64;*.n5 4.4rt
.Ob 433. '-"7 1.7o
.42 ^96.15 3.^2
.27 490.47 d.'-f.
.44 487. «0 H.49
. 1 1 Hb2.52 1 ,SJ
.^b b46./,4 3.4*5
.01 JU !')«.-! 4 .. 2.^^
NO eL
.72
1.80
1.27
.45
.55
2.21
1 .bfa
I.b9
2.30
^.06
3.30
2.32
.^*4
1.11
.34
1.M5
.25
i .23
.60
NOX
3.02
b.52
4.24
2.81
3.55
b.91
5.88
5.78
b.b9
7.05
7.25
6.81
2.21
4.33
2.4*2
b.34
1.76
H ,6tt
3.24
r-'OXC
3.
6.
4.
2.
3.
6.
o ,
5.
6.
6.
6.
6.
2.
4.
2.
6.
1 .
4 .
3.
11
33
09
72
59
86
80
81
75
67
99
56
33
U5
04*
u3
73
b3
15
ICO
3
1
1
3
C
6
0
2
0
a
2
0
6
r\
2
0
6
a
f>
.67
.93
.65
.57
.73
.52
.73
.U9
.55
.54
.59
.10
.C7
.6U
.59
. -
.(7
.21
>37>
FUEL
ECON'
17.8
15.3
13.2
10.9
10.8
13.0
17.2
11.4
13.2
12.0
13.2
11.7
14.0
15.7
12.5
14.4
11.2
12.0
22.1
-------
TABLt 13A (CONT.)
iin.htti.JST LMISSION TEST RESULTS IN (3R AMS/'vi 1 Lt
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0170
0171
0172
01/3
0174
017b
0176
0177
0178
CD
YEAR MAKE CIO
1972
HC
FOR9 200
1968 AMC 232
1968 BUIC 400
1970 CHEV 400
1972 MERC 3bl
1966 VOLK 79
1Q67 DOOG 318
1967 FORD 289
1^71 CHEV 350
O.C.
CO
TEST
C02
4.84 b3.44 417.4b
3.61 6H.09 381.?7
4.64 74.yu 67S.R8
3.1b 43.97 734.il
4.63 80.02 712.?4
60.32 119.2V 144.73
7.09 1U2.H9 4^0.87
11.72 107. Rt> 369.J4
MO
2.7J
3. S3
4.97
2.27
3. S3
1.43
3.78
2.19
4.^0
N02
.62
.14
1.63
.31
1.03
.27
1.19
.39
1 .44
NOX
3.33
3.67
6.61
2.5rt
4.b6
1.70
4.97
2 • b 8
b . 04
"OXC
3.19
3.b8
6.29
' J o O
C. • OO
4.33
1.61
b.07
2.60
6.09
ICO
3.78
4.21
5.79
C.10
0.37
5.26
6.22
0.82
1.93
FUEL
ECON'
17.2
17.8
10.9
10.9
10.4
17.0
14.2
15.4
10.2
-------
TAPL." 133
t'XHtJST EMISSION TEST 9FSULTS IN G*ftMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, O.f.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
ICL?i
HP'£^'
0001
0002
0003
ono'i
0005
0006
ono7
0008
0009
00 1C
0011
3012
0013
0013
U01 <*
u015
OOlo
0017
'3Glc
VTA*
1972
1971
19/0
1970
1953
1972
1971
1966
1969
1963
1963
1967
1966
P 19fa~
19^9
1971
1S72
1971
Y373
<»K
OLD
SHE
,: CID
S 350
V 400
3UIC 350
FORO 200
CHfc
CHE
FOP
CAD
Grit
VOL
V 327
V 3C 1
0 250
I 429
V 350
K 91
OLDS 350
CHE
r* uf-~
o n^.
o ucr
•1UI
V 327
V 283
V 283
C i *? \j
100G 225
'?UI
OLD
CH^.
C 3^3
i -*55
\l 250
HC
4.25
3.03
3.72
4.09
5ol5
2.18
3. 00
S.46
3.17
3.93
5.35
7.74
24.5-5
14.19
2.25
2.95
2.09
2.99
2.44
CC
......i
37.06
65.69
33. 03
61.78
25.52
33. 32
93.73
50.72
60.22
51.16
88.14
43. 06
27.94
44.17
41.26
31. 34
32. *4
33.71
C02
590
576
485
336
407
658
369
480
^95
275
512
415
352
202
530
363
690
743
434
.35
.90
.10
.61
.07
.20
.01
.20
.43
.37
.67
.29
.07
.91
.33
,U3
.57
.05
.27
NO
3.31
4.47
3.60
2.50
3.75
3.55
4.87
3.50
4.20
1.28
4.23
3.83
3.75
2.17
3.86
4.45
3.25
4.12
2.99
N02
1. 10
.86
1. 02
.77
1. 34
.94
2.09
1. 18
2.33
.15
1.49
1. 32
1.42
. 50
1. 21
2.09
.35
1. 29
.93
NOX
4.41
5.34
4.62
3.27
5.09
4.49
6.96
4.68
6.54
1.43
5.72
5.15
5.18
2.67
5.07
6.53
4. 10
5.41
3.92
NOXC
4.16
5«04
4.45
3.11
4.73
4.27
6.18
4.17
5.79
1.28
5.33
4o92
4.57
2.47
4.35
5.68
3.50
4.76
3.64
ICO
a
0
u
i
3
2
3
7
U
5
U
9
3
3
1
5
r\
^
3
.75
.89
.04
.28
.ee
.3C
.99
.fiU
.66
.26
.78
.31
.78
.68
.83
.11
.19
.68
.99
FUEL
ECON
12.1
13.8
14.8
22.1
17.1
12.6
20.6
13.7
14.8
23.2
14.5
15.3
17.8
30. <*
14.*)
20.1
11.9
11.0
17*9
-------
TABLE 13B (CONT.)
"MISSION TL;ST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE
NUMT.rP
0019
0020
OC21
0022
0023
0024
0025
0026
0027
VO
M
002d
0030
0031
C033
0034
3035
003fc.
U037
j C1 3 c
0039
YEAR
1969
1967
1971
1959
1971
1969
1970
1971
1972
1972
1972
1965
1967
1972
IOTP
1972
1966
1970
19fja
MAKE
PONT
FC-'.O
OODG
FORO
PONT
OLDS
•3UIC
M-IRC
CHEV
CHE V
OH." V
MERC
°ONT
PLYM
FORO
CH£V
"UNT
FO^Q
r 0 3. 3
cm
,00
269
383
351
400
350
.55
351
350
307
350
302
400
360
uro
350
:,25
351
390
HC
4.52
12.07
4.93
2.81
5.72
4.54
5.22
3.24
2. 03
2.65
3.63
6.94
4.70
2.97
2. 71
3.62
3.8?
5. 01
CO
60.62
149.22
162.77
37. 20
27.98
104.82
62.65
43.63
77. 35
36.37
31.73
IOC. 13
101.53
51.44
49. 11
43.95
44. 56
63. 01
C02
580.09
309. So
532.30
618.87
817.47
516.43
601.F8
617.61
628.55
759. C4
501.62
479.62
514.43
620.48
572.98
435.39
673.b8
575.90
NO
3.U3
1.94
2.65
3.06
4.42
2.91
4.16
3.20
2.90
3.41
4.17
3.11
3.75
4.33
5.10
2.79
3.11
3.42
5.47
N02
.96
.29
.59
.70
1.86
.58
1.54
.83
1.16
1.11
. 88
1. 12
1.79
1.49
3. 49
.56
.94
1.33
3.64
NOX
4.40
2.23
3.24
3.76
6.27
3.59
5.69
4.03
4.06
4.52
5.04
4.22
5.55
5.82
8.59
3.35
4.06
4.74
9.10
NOXC
4.00
2.06
2.83
3.29
5.61
3.23
5.52
3.66
3.63
3.81
4.52
3.77
5.08
5.07
7.44
2.86
3.47
4.06
7.91
ICO
3.88
•"0.26
3.78
3.C.7
4.54
7.87
1 .55
1 .93
9.C9
o.r 1
4.10
1.68
6.22
11.32
1 ,U6
2.11
0.12
C .10
U . 5ij
FUEL
ECON
12.9
15.2
11.0
12.9
10.1
12.8
12.4
12.7
14.0
13.8
10.8
15.8
13.5
12.9
12.5
13.5
15.7
11.7
12.8
-------
TABLE 13B (CONT, )
^XHAUST MISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE.
0.4c
0041
0042
0043
3 044
004=5
3C46
OC47
OC47 1.
VO
ro
0043
0049
0050
0051
0052
0052 '>••
C0b3
GC5*
•1 0" 5
"* ' ^ £•
J '_ . v
Y^.
197,
19S3
1970
1972
1971
1969
19/0
1971
1971
1970
1967
1972
1970
1970
19*5
1937
1967
1972
MAK£ CIO
TOYO 120
POnjD 390
OLOS 350
3UIC 455
CLDS 350
'LYrt 225
OODG 31ft
?QNT "+00
°ONT 4G3
"HEV 263
PQ^O 3G2
aONT 326
VOLK 102
OHCtf 3C7
SHCV 30"
FORD 269
C5HPy 361
OLJ3 433
HC
2.15
5.96
4.58
2.79
4.32
2.44
5.21
3.77
3.80
15.65
3.80
13.50
1.97
4.
-------
TC.BLE ' i3.8 '(CONT. )
EMISSION TFST PE;SULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON', o.c.
197? F'.o^Rat TEST
VEHICLt
NUMBER
0057
0053
0059
0060
OC61
0062
0063
0064
0065
vo
U)
OC66
0057
OD69
OC7G
Oi? 71
007?
OC73
o •: 7 *
OC7T.
0 . 7 f:
YEA.?. '1AKT
1970 TOYO
1969 VOLK
1970 FORD
1969 PONT
1972 FOSO
1970 °ONT
1966 OLDS
1967 VOLK
1972 VOLK
1971 VOLK
1971 VOLK
1966 :H:V
IS 70 AMC
1972 'iUIC
1971 r,H-:v
1971 PORD
196* m°0
13-S8 CriCV
1CJ72 . CH'-V
CIO
71
91
351
350
302
350
330
92
97
97
97
283
3C4
U55
'550
351
289
107
140
HC
1.34
3.56
3.52
3.27
2.13
1.43
7.82
4. HO
3. 36
4.92
2.80
o.93
3.95
1. 33
3. 37
2.84
3.54
5.SU
5.47
CO
12.
11.
14.
37.
21.
44.
98.
51.
32.
31.
33.
111.
32.
12.
23.
23.
52.
82.
30.
25
44
77
33
92
37
38
60
47
79
57
83
36
34
41
53
SO
4U
97
C02
245.
252.
561.
462.
579.
506.
442.
176.
281.
214.
281.
411.
513.
606.
545.
539.
335.
367.
349.
33
41
38
71
79
46
55
29
24
35
10
40
10
U2
83
Cl .
00
56
71
NO
3.99
2,34
5.53
4.64
3.31
4.09
2.01
1.25
2.11
1.77
1.89
2.32
3.41
2.50
4.23
5.17
2.62
1.46
2.07
N02
1. 34
.55
2.45
1.77
.89
1.37
.35
.16
.34
.39
. 23
. 35
. 77
. 41
1. 01
1. 65
.49
.25
. 35
NOX
5.33
2.89
7.98
6.41
4.20
5.46
2.36
l.Hl
2.45
2.16
2.12
2.67
4.17
2.92
5.24
6.82
3.12
1.71
2.42
NOXC
4.69
2.48
6.96
5.63
3.68
5.54
2.07
1.37
2.33
1.97
1.99
2.52
4.00
2.81
4.38
6.37
2.95
1.60
?.32
ICO
1 .83
2.2-
. 0.01
2.C7
3.07
5.79
2.78
6.52
3.B8
3.78
1 .93
3.57
0.82
1 . •: r
c.ut
1.37
5.?.?
3.99
i . : e
FUEL
ECON
32.8
31.5
14.9
16.7
14.3
15.1
14.3
32.7
25.9
31.7
25.9
14. b
15.4
14.1
14,8
13.9
17.9
17.2
21.7
-------
TABLE 133 (CONT.)
:.XHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE
NIMFt S
0077
0076
0079
0080
0081
0082
0083
0084
vo 0084
0083
0085
0086
0067
OC8f-
0069
OU9C
3C91
J09?
1 7°. 3
YEAR
1972
1971
1967
1971
1972
1'371
1972
1972
R 1972
1967
R 1967
1971
1971
1971
1972
195*
1970
^ ir,9
1972
•1AKE
°ONT
FORO
PLYM
3UIC
000 G
FO^O
AMC
FORO
FORO
CHf. V
•7HEV
:H-:V
-ORO
;n£v
TOOG
-ORD
>LY*
C HE V
IT 3"-)
CIO
35U
98
318
455
360
200
258
351
351
283
263
350
351
350
2T5
J90
?25
3C7
351
HC
4.13
2.39
7,19
2.53
2.35
2.02
1.37
1.63
1.48
5.61
6.93
4.11
3.75
3. o:
2. as
5.93
2.41
. '-27
2. I7
CO
98. 33
41,95
126,46
44.55
14.99
15.32
11.37
13.63
20.61
80.02
91.16
49.89
43.99
**6. 01
39. 38
68. 11
42.27
SI. 33
14.38
C02
561.
268.
370.
775.
621.
363.
394.
756.
784.
405.
552.
455.
599.
463.
371.
497.
333.
410.
660.
85
87
19
00
34
54
42
23
83
24
11
45
24
C5
82
99
99
57
09
NO
1.85
3.13
2.32
4.16
5.11
4.12
3.44
3,54
3.21
2,65
3.19
2.47
3.75
1.88
3.77
3.85
4.06
1.45
4.*»4
N02
.17
.52
.29
, 82
1.51
2.07
1. 14
.62
.78
o60
1.14
.50
1.40
.29
1.75
1. 36
1.52
1.99
1.45
NOX
2.02
3.65
2.61
4.97
6.62
6,19
4.58
4.16
3.99
3.26
4.33
2.97
5.15
2.17
5.52
5.21
5.60
5.4<»
5.89
NOXC
1.92
3.49
2.47
4.75
6.29
5»89
4.44
4.26
3.72
3.18
3.92
2.79
4.95
2.11
5.09
4.74
5.18
4.88
5.34
ICO
•
5.26
1 .46
2.C2
0.50
o.r
1 .09
0.19
O.C9
o.r
3.57
4.32
5.f 6
3.99
4.43
2.U9
2.Q7
a .1?
f).37
n . •> f.
FUEL
ECON
12.2
25.9
15.0
iO.4
13.6
22,5
21.3
11.3
10.8
16.2
12.3
16.2
13.0
15.6
20.1
14.2
21.5
17.5
12.9
-------
TABLE * 13BC(CONT.)
. XH£UST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1-975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE
NUMBER
OG9,
0095
0096
0097
0098
0099
210C
oioi
0102
n 0103
0104
CIO 5
oice
0107
3 1 0 *
0109
nuc
Gill
'Mil '
YEAR
1966
1966
1970
1971
1969
1959
1969
1970
196S
1970
1968
1467
1971
19^
1971
1-72
19-2
1972
- I9r?
•^AKE
3UIC
OOOG
PORO
OPEL
~HEV
1UIC
CH'-V
tfOLK
"ORD
PONT
CHcV
1SRC
11 A T S
W1C
(.INC
ILPS
CHF. V
'LY-<
PLYM
CIO •
340
383
302
116
230
430
35-0
97
289
400
396
390
97
300
<+fcO
453
350
318
318
HC
12.37
4.03
3.58
1.60
2.93
5. .51
4.44
2.53
3.89
3.54
7.72
5.07
2.58
7.99
4. 13
«*. 01
2.63
4. 23
H . '7 3
CO
155.50
60. 35
30.62
22.13
26.53
69. 08
91.30
34. m
15.25
38.33
137.65
67. 14
13. 98
112. 05
111.27
26. 04
33.02
72. 26
63.51
C02
320.
477.
505.
219.
384.
583.
554.
286.
497.
623.
483.
566.
307.
432.
618.
839.
954.
409.
408.
90
25
84
06
71
07
02
22
M
15
97
43
61
15
53
69
78
69
57
NO
1.40
3.84
3.08
1.75
1.85
H.60
3.58
2.96
3.93
3.58
2.94
5.11
3. 09
2.73
1.96
2.04
3.41
3.32
3.25
N02
.23
1..05
.77
.36
. 30
2.27
1.59
.79
1.17
.91
.57
.71
.72
.72
.27
.24
.77
.79
.87
NOX
1.63
4.88
3.85
2.13
2.15
6.88
5.17
3.76
5.10
4.49
3.50
5.82
3.81
3.46
2.23
2.28
4.18
4.11
4.12
NOXC
1.48
4.47
3.53
1.97
1.99
6.49
4.87
3.41
4.91
4.30
3.39
5.64
3.61
3.27
2.17
2.20
4.64
3.97
4.06
ICO
11.32
3.57
0.28
0 . 1 C
C.6H
5.93
4.U3
2.11
0.46
2.C2
9.09
2.59
2.78
6.67
0.37
"MC
*.r
7.-51
7.51
FUEL
ECON
14.7
15.2
15.7
34.3
20.4
12.5
12.5
25.5
16.6
12.8
12.2
12.9
26.3
1^.0
11.0
9.9
55.3
16.5
16.9
-------
TABLE 13B (CONT.)
XHfluST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1975 FEDERAL TFST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE
0112
01.13
0113
0114
0115
one
0117
0118
vo 0119
ON
0120
0121
0122
0123
0124
0126.
0127
J128
01?9
-Mxc,
YfIA0
197Q
1963
~ 1968
1968
1963
1969
1969
1970
1966
1969
1971
1366
1958
19o9
1970
19*6
1959
1970
r 1 q?n
H«S
CH-Y
C40I
CAOI
PONT
DODG
PORO
CHEV
CHt:v
CHEV
CAOI
PLYM
PLYM
CHRY
FO^O
VOLK
i ,c •
OLDS
D31G
innr,
CIO
440
472
472
350
313
302
3C7
350
194
472
225
225
353
2 CO
97
232
4? 5
383
.*R3
HC
2.38
1.55
2.13
3.04
3. 70
4.66
4.95
6.38
3. 15
2.94
2.54
3. 53
6.89
4.56
3.34
5.6^
3.51
14.87
1 A . U *
CO
24. 18
36.21
50.11
34, 38
47.75
42,29
60,94
123.61
92.60
56.51
46.37
63.66
115.58
69.41
27. 34
13F.. 36
93. 7U
115.56
97. u?
C02
555.29
573.33
747.25
577,05
451.62
523.84
504.11
425.17
336.72
678.74
347.19
371.66
521.62
300.30
311.71
321.43
533.61
^492. .82
475. ?7
NO
4.17
2.34
2.95
2,17
2.95
6.09
4.70
1.93
2.33
5.07
3.97
2.80
3.94
2.78
2.28
1.69
3.92
3.4Q
J.36
N02
1.83
.52
.48
.47
.59
2.96
1.65
.25
.53
1.66
1.09
1.16
1.55
.84
-.43
. 31
1.47
1. 01
1. 07
HOX
6.09
2.86
3.43
2.64
3.53
9.05
6.35
2.18
2.86
6.73
5.06
3.96
5.49
3.62
1.84
2.00
5.39
4.41
4.44
NOXC
5.79
2.80
3.33
2.54
3.36
8.58
5.96
2.13
2.77
6.60
4.94
3.64
5.01
3.33
1.64
1.78
4.78
3.97
4.10
ICO
1 .83
2.88
1 .65
2.11
0.7.1
2.78
5.66
4 ,5U
5.39
2.68
a. 10
5.C2
9.77
7.69
0 . f 2
5.26
5 . ? ?-
?.C7
*
U .Ul
FUEL
ECON
14.8
14.0
10.6
13.9
16.5
14.7
14.4
13.9
1705
11.4
20.7
18.4
12.2
20.9
24. j
16.0
12.6
12.3
13.*
-------
TABLE 138 (CONT.)
FXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, O.C.
1973 FEDERAL T^ST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE
NUMBiZR
0130
0130
0131
0133
0134
0135
0136
0137
vo °138
0139
0140
0141
C142
0143
0143
014.
oiue
n i J* (*•
n i L+ Q
YCA*
1971
R 1971
1967
1972
19&8
1967
1969
1965
1967
1971
1970
1972
1972
1959
R 1959
1972
1971
1972
1971
lAK1^ CIO
°LYM 318
°LYM 318
CHEV 283
CADI 472
°ONT 400
CHEV 250
FORD 302
F0=0 390
CHEV 263
FORO 400
MERC 351
OATS 97
= LYM 318
CHZV 3C7
Ch"v 307
;H-::V UQ2
r.HrV mo
r 1 o n "3 f ?
»J > •, 'J OUC.
T -1 V O 71
»J I o /I
HC
c
3.00
2.86
23.01
1.24
8.26
6.34
4.90
6.03
14.20
3.68
3.73
2.17
2.78
5.1.
5.51
1. 43
3. 01
3.72
?. 19
CO
44.79
39.13
88.69
9.83
115.52
82.80
63. 02
120.93
142.87
60.46
57.68
16.59
21.64
76.19
82.04
25. 85
21.47
35.31
18.77
C02
444.17
458.76
338.17
870.40
530.87
400.80
410.18
518.34
393.17
628.62
516.38
305.86
612.25
522.57
475.43
631.40
348.25
630.43
331.09
NO
2.85
2.87
1.39
3.G4
1.05
1.89
3.93
2.07
2.04
4.87
2.94
3.92
4.10
3.77
3.39
3. 39
2.95
3.24
2.14
N02
.67
.74
.23
.81
.16
.23
1.74
.37
.37
1.65
.61
1.87
1.22
1. 07
1. 14
1.22
.73
.98
.39
NQX
3.52
3.61
1.62
3.85
1.21
2.11
5.67
2.45
2.40
6.53
3.55
5.79
5.32
4.84
4.53
4.61
3.68
..22
2.53
NOXC
3.19
3.19
1.43
3.76
1.19
2.20
5.59
2.U7
2.60
6.52
3.58
5.84
5.45
5.00
4.07
4.89
3.37
4.22
2.49
ICO
2.0.'
2.11
3.57
0.0
6.38
3.88
7.6T
7.33
9.77
2.11
6.37
U.32
3.28
5.79
5.93
1 .65
•?.C
1 .55
i .18
FUEL
ECON
16.9
16.7
16.1
10.0
12.0
16.1
16.9
12.2
13.4
12.1
14.3
26.2
13.5
13.4
14. 2
10.1
22.7
12.7
24.1
-------
vo
Co
TABLE 138 (CONT.)
i. XMfiUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
1ICLE
JMBER
0150
0151
0152
0153
0154
0155
0156
0158
0159
0160
0161
0162
0163
0164
0165
0166
0167
0165
C16 J
YEA*
1966
1968
1969
1971
1970
1970
1968
1972
1966
1969
1969
19'2
1970
1971
1967
1968
1965
19*8
1972
MAKE
FORD
PLYM
OOOG
3UIC
OLOS
PLYM
FORD
FCKD
PONT
MERC
°LYM
CHrtY
CH-V
CHE V
4MC
:HEV
1E3C
FQP.D
F.?°.0
CIO
200
318
383
350
455
318
240
400
389
390
383
V40
350
307
343
250
390
390
122
HC
4.22
3.75
3.72
18.93
2.48
3.63
LOG
3.07
4.66
3. 80
3.71
4.75
5.27
3. 30
'3.70
5. 30
13.30
3. 81
3. 0^
CO
55.59
42.24
41.87
73,44
32.95
68. 32
33. 09
101.71
43.96
72.22
55.43
38.92
109. 26
28.41
108.74
i*9.66
173.60
69.83
54. 16
C02
365olO
472.21
468.50
576.19
714.27
522.74
429.71
626.16
539.77
566.80
552.78
623.48
473.10
482.92
479.43
481.50
453.83
588.08
'i V1
287.33
NO
2.51
4.98
2.70
2.41
2.95
4.94
4.18
4.34
4.40
4.88
4.46
4.66
1.56
3. 38
2.10
H.56
1.56
3.74
2.68
N02
. .65
2.07
1. 00
.42
.50
2.42
1.49
Io86
2.44
2.66
3.46
2.51
.36
1. 06
. 44
1.94
.29
1.39
.65
NOX
3.16
7.06
3.71
2.83
3.44
7.36
5.66
6.20
6.84
7.54
7.92
7.17
1.92
4.44
2.54
6.49
1.85
5.14
3.32
NOXC
3.26
6.85
3.58
3.19
3.48
7.31
5.59
6.24
6.90
7.14
7.63
6.91
2.04
4.15
2.64
6.17
1.81
4.95
3.18
ICO
" .67
1 .93
1.65
3.57
".73
6.52
G.7'
2.4^
0.55
U.5U
2.59
0.1?
6.r:
c.eu
2.59
" .r
6.f 7
4.21
6*. ?7
FUEL
ECON
19.1
16.1
16.3
11.8
11.5
13.8
18.3
11.2
14.2
12.8
13.6
12.7
3.4
16.5
13.3
15.4
11.5
12.5
23.2
-------
TABLc 13B (CONT.)
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RtSULTS IN GRAMS/MILE
WASHINGTON, P.C.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
VEHICLE
NUMBER
0170
0171
0172
0173
017i*
0175
0176
0177
0178
YEAR
1970
1963
1956
1970
1972
1966
1957
1967
1971
^AKE
rORO
1HC
BUIC
CHEV
MERC
VOLK
OODG
FOPD
CH.IV
CIO
200
232
400
400
351
79
318
289
350
HC
3.71
3.22
3.47
2.62
3.53
61.35
7.18
11. 35
3. 39
CO
40.17
59.09
65.47
33.66
59.08
119.60
96.70
105.74
49.06
C02
412.39
369.09
645.66
732.80
699.92
142.91
423.93
346.38
743.19
NO
2.82
3.50
5.40
2.24
3.70
1.38
3.93
2.15
4.63
N02
.64
.12
1.93
.30
1.07
.24
1.17
.39
1.59
NOX
3.46
3.62
7.33
2.54
4.77
1.62
5.11
2.54
6.22
NOXC
3.32
3.51
6.98
2.84
4.53
1.54
5.19
2.56
6.27
ICO
3.78
a.?1
5.79
0.10
.37
5.26
6.22
O.B2
1 .93
FUEL
ECON
18.2
18.8
11.7
11.2
11.0
16.9
14.8
16.2
10.7
VO
VO
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
SHEET
1. Report No.
APTD 1506
3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Title and Subtitle
A Study of Emissions from 1966-1972 Light-Duty
Vehicles in Washington, D. C. Second Edition
5. Report Date
January, 197**
6.
7. Author(s)
A. R. Martin, R. A. Herrick
8. Performing Organization Rept.
No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
General Environments Corporation
6840 Industrial Road
Springfield, Virginia 22151
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contract/Gram No.
68-01-0451*
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Water Programs
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Division of Certification and Surveillance
M-U-hlsau 40105
13; Type of Report Ac Period
Covered
Final
14.
15.
16. Abstracts
General Environments Corporation (GEC) of Springfield, Virginia was selected
to participate in the 1972 Emission Factors Program (Six Cities Program) by
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). One hundred and seventy privately
owned passenger vehicles from the Metropolitan Washington, D. C. area were tested
for exhaust emission levels of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons
and oxides of nitrogen according to the 1975 Federal Test Procedure. Testing of
vehicles included both cold and hot start cycles. The test results were then
used to calculate emission factors based on both the 1972 and 1975 Federal Test
Procedures.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17o. Descriptors
air pollution
motor vehicles
surveillance
17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
17e. COSATI Field/Group 13B
18. Availability Statement
Unlimited
19. Security Class (This
Report)
UNCLASSIFIE
;1EP
(Thi!
20. Security Class (This
Page
UNCLASSIFIED
21. No. of Pages
10U
22. Price
IREV. 3-721
USCOMM-DC M»52-P72
-------
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORM NTIS-35 (10-70) (Bibliographic Data Sheet based on COSATI
Guidelines to Format Standards for Scientific and Technical Reports Prepared by or for' the Federal Government,
PB-180 600).
1. Report Number. Each individually bound report shall carry a unique alphanumeric designation selected by the performing
organization or provided by the sponsoring organization. Use uppercase letters and Arabic numerals only. Examples
FASEB-NS-87 and FAA-RD-68-09.
2. Leave blank.
3. Recipient's Accession Number. . Reserved for use by each report recipient.
4 Title and Subtitle. Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed promi-
nently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more
than one volume, repeat the primary title, d>l volume number and include subtitle for ihe specific volume.
5- Report Date. I ach report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected
(e.g., date of issue, date of approval, date of preparation.
6. Performing Organization Code. Leave blank.
7. Authors). Give name(s) in conventional order (e.g., John K. Doe, or J.Robert Hoe). List author's affiliation if it differs
from the performing organisation.
8. Performing Orgonizotion Report Number. Insert if performing organisation wishes to assign this number.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address, (rive name, street, city, state, and zipcojc. List no more than two levels of
an organisational hicrauliy. Display the name of the organization exactly as it should appear in Government indexes such
as USCRDR-I.
10. Project Tosk Work Unit Number. I'sc i In proicct. task and work unit numbers under which the report was prepared.
11. Controct Cront Number. ln>< rt contr.ul or grant number under which report wus prepared.
12- Sponsoring Agency Name and Address. ln< lu.ie /. ip code.
13. Type of Report and Period Covered, ludu .ite interim, final, etc., and, if applicable, dates covered.
14. Sponsoring Agency Code. Leave blank.
15. Supplementary Notes. Knter information not nu luded elsewhere liut useful, such a: : Prepared in cooperation with . . .
Translation of ... Presented at conference <>l . . . To he published in ... Super-., ,ie.-. . . . Supplements
16. Abstract. Include .1 brief f JOO words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report.
If the report contains a significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis, (a). Descriptors. Select from the Thesaurus of I'ngineenng and Scientific Terms the
proper authorised terms that identify the major concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used
as index entries for cataloging.
(b). Identifiers and Open-Ended Terms. L'se identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use
open-ended terms written in descriptor form lor those subjects for which no descriptor exists.
(c). COSATI Field/Group. Field and Group assignments are to be taken from the 1 <)6'> COSATI Subject Category List.
Since the majority of documents are multid isc iplinary in nature, the primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be the specific
discipline, area of human endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary
Field/Group assignments that will follow the primary posting(s).
18. Distribution Statement. Denote relcasahi lity to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "He-
lease unlimited". Cite any availability to the public, with address and price.
19 & 20. Security Classification. Oo not submit classified reports to the National Technical
21. Number of Pages. Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but excluding distribution
list, if any.
22. Price. Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
FORM NTIS-35 IREV. 3-721 USCOMM-OC I4»52-P72
------- |