Prepublication issue for EPA libraries
and State Solid Waste Management Agencies
WRAP
A Model for Regional
Documentation of Operational and Exercise Runs
This report (SW-164c) describes work performed
for the Office of Solid Waste under contract No. 68-01-2976
and is reproduced as received from the contractor.
The findings should be attributed to the contractor
and not to the Office of Solid Waste.
Copies will be available from the
National Technical Information Service
U.S. Department of Commerce
Springfield, Virginia 22161
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1978
-------
This report was prepared by Edward Berman of Mitre Corp., Bedford,
Massachusetts, under Contract No. 68-01-2976.
Publication does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of commercial products constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government,
An environmental protection publication (SW-16Ac) in the solid waste
management series.
-------
ABSTRACT
Inputs, outputs, costs and flow assumptions are presented for
the St. Louis operational test program and Northeastern Massachusetts
parametric exercise program of WRAP. Graphical presentation of the
results of all runs is included together with an analytical cross-
evaluation.
-------
Acknowledgements
The assistance of the following people is gratefully acknowledged:
Eugene A. Counihan of MITRE in the preparation of process cost
estimates; Miss Deborah W. Rossino of the East-West Gateway Coordinating
Council in the preparation of data for the St. Louis operational runs;
Chris 6. Ganotis, Frank R. Parsons, Rene Rofe, and Mrs. Elizabeth C.
Williams of MITRE in the preparation of data for the Massachusetts
exercise runs; Mrs. Verniece Hensey, David H. Lehman, and Miss Mary V.
Mollo-Christensen of MITRE for the implementation of the WRAP computer
program; Mrs. Elizabeth C. Williams for editorial review of the
document; Dr. William M. Stein of MITRE in the development of the
equation structure; Miss Donna M. Krabbe of the Environmental Protection
Agency and Stephen G. Lewis of MITRE for their general guidance and
counsel; and Miss Donna G. Temple for her dedication in drafting and
redrafting the document. The author alone is responsible for errors or
omissions.
iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Illustrations vii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE 5
PROGRAM RUNS
The St. Louis Operational Test 5
The Run Set 7
Cross-Analysis of Solution Structure for 11
the Static St. Louis Runs
Run A 11
Run A-l 20
Run B 23
Run B-l 26
Run C 29
Run E 32
Run F 35
Run F-l 38
Cross-Analysis of Costs for the Static 41
St. Louis Runs
The Dynamic Run 41
Cross-Period Structural Analysis of the 44
Dynamic St. Louis Run
The Massachusetts Exercise Program 51
Analysis 56
Cross-Analysis of Solution Structures 63
for the Massachusetts Exercise Program
The Base Case 63
Run A 63
Run A-2 66
Run A-3 69
Run A-4 72
The Tonnage Parameterization 75
Run B-l 75
Run B-2 78
The CROW-FLY (Region Size) 81
Parameterization
Run C-l: 45 mph speed (small region) 81
Run C-2: 20 mph speed (medium region) 84
Run C-3: 10 mph speed (large region) 87
The Truck Constraint Parameterization 90
Run D-l (Medium Truck Constraint) 90
Run D-2 (Tight Truck Constraint) 93
Intercept Parameterization 96
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Concluded)
Page
CHAPTER 3 INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE OPERATIONAL 101
TEST AND EXERCISE RUNS
Source Data 101
Site Data 101
Process Data 108
Process Cost Notes 108
Process 901, Transfer, Packer to Van 108
Process 902, Transfer, Packer to Con- 108
talner
Process 903, Transfer, Packer or Van 111
to Rail
Process 905, Shredded Fuel Process 111
Process 906, Secondary Recovery 111
Process 907, Sanitary Landfill 111
Process 915, RESCO Process 112
Process 917, RESCO Landfill 112
Process 925, Dried Shredded Fuel 112
Process 935, Gas Pyrolysis 112
Process 936, Dummy Incinerator Residue 112
Process 946, Dummy Heavy End 116
Process 955, Shredded Fuel/Secondary 116
Recovery Composite
Revenues 116
Constraints 116
St. Louis A, B, and B-l 116
St. Louis A-l, C, and E 117
St. Louis F 117
St. Louis F-l 117
St. Louis 6 117
N. E. Massachusetts 117
Transportation Data 118
Miscellaneous Assumptions ng
CHAPTER 4 PROCESS OPTIONS AND SELECTIONS FOR THE 143
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE PROGRAMS
CHAPTER 5 OUTPUTS OF OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE 165
PROGRAM RUNS
vi
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Number Page
1 The St. Louis Region 6
2 District Centroid Locations and Tonnage Generation 8
Assumptions for the Static St. Louis Runs
3 Districts, Centroid Locations and Tonnage Genera- 9
tion Assumptions for the Dynamic St. Louis Run
4 The St. Louis Run Set 10
5 Summary of Static St. Louis Runs 12
6 Sites and Site Locations for the Static St. Louis 13
Runs
7 Process Options/St. Louis For Static Runs 14
8 St. Louis A-l: Off-Site Processing (Rail-Haul of 15
Fuel)
9 St. Louis B: Landfill Added (Truck-Haul of Fuel) 16
and B-l, Landfill Added (Rail-Haul of Fuel)
10 St. Louis F-l: Processing Forced On Utility Sites 17
(Meramec Capacity: 1267)
11 Sites and Site Locations for the Dynamic St. Louis 42
Run
12 Process Options/St. Louis for Dynamic Run 43
13 St. Louis G: Dynamic Run, Gas Pyrolysis in 2nd 45
Period
14 Districts, Centroid Locations and Tonnage Genera- 52
tion Assumptions for the Massachusetts Exercise
Program
15 Sites and Site Locations for the Massachusetts 57
Exercise Program
16 Process Alternatives -- Massachusetts Exercise 58
Program
17 Summary of Massachusetts Exercise Program 59
18 N. E. Mass. A: The Base Case (All Options) 60
19 N. E. Mass. C-l: CROW-FLY at 45 M.P.H. 61
20 N. E. Mass. D-2: Tight Truck Constraints 62
21 St. Louis A: The Base Case (Truck-Haul of Fuel) 144
22 St. Louis A-l: Off-Site Processing (Rail-Haul of 145
Fuel)
23 St. Louis B: Landfill Added (Truck-Haul of Fuel) 146
and B-l, Landfill Added (Rail-Haul of Fuel)
24 St. Louis C: No Interstate Flows (Rail-Haul of 147
Fuel)
25 St. Louis E: Half Commercial Tonnage (Rail-Haul 148
of Fuel)
26 St. Louis F: Processing Forced on Utility Sites 149
(Meramec Capacity: 624)
vi i
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (concluded)
Figure Number Page
27 St. Louis F-l: Processing Forced on Utility Sites 150
28 St. Louis G: Dynamic Run, Gas Pyrolysis 151
29 N. E. Mass. A: The Base Case (All Options) 152
30 N. E. Mass. A-2: Base Case 153
31 N. E. Mass. A-3: Base Case with all 514 Starting 154
Basis
32 N. E. Mass. A-4: Base Case with all-Haverhill 155
Starting Basis
33 N. E. Mass. B-l: Double Tonnage 156
34 N. E. Mass. B-2: Half-Tonnage 157
35 N. E. Mass. C-l: CROW-FLY at 45 M.P.H. 158
36 N. E. Mass. C-2: CROW-FLY at 20 M.P.H. 159
37 N. E. Mass. C-3: CROW-FLY at 10 M.P.H. 160
38 N. E. Mass. D-l : Moderate Truck Constraints 161
39 N. E. Mass. D-2: Tight Truck Constraints 162
40 N. E. Mass. E-l : Double Intercepts 163
41 N. E. Mass. E-2: Half Intercepts 164
Table Number Page
I District Centroid Locations and Tonnage Genera- 102
tion Assumptions for the Static St. Louis Runs
II Districts, Centroid Locations and Tonnage Gen- 103
eration Assumptions for the Dynamic St. Louis
Runs
III Districts, Centroid Locations and Tonnage Gen- 104
eration Assumptions for the Massachusetts
Exercise Program
IV Sites and Site Locations for the Static St. 105
Louis Runs
V Sites and Site Locations for the Dynamic St. 106
Louis Run
VI Sites and Site Locations for the Massachusetts 107
Exercise Program
VII General Process Information 109
VIII Process Costs for the Operational Test and no
Exercise Programs
IX Recovered Materials, Compositions and Values 113
X Haul Assumptions for Recovered Materials in St. 114
Louis Runs
XI Revenue Assumptions for Operational Test and 115
Exercise Runs
XII Transportation File, St. Louis A ng
XIII Transportation File, St. Louis A-l and E 122
XIV Transportation File, St. Louis B and B-l 124
XV Transportation File, St. Louis C ]29
vi i i
-------
Table Number
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
XXVI
XXVII
XXVIII
XXIX
XXX
XXXI
XXXII
XXXIII
XXXIV
XXXV
XXXVI
XXXVII
XXXVIII
XXXIX
XL
XL I
XLII
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Transportation File, St. Louis F
Transportation File, St. Louis F-l
Transportation File for St. Louis G
Transportation File for N. E. Massachusetts A
Transportation File for N. E. Massachusetts Runs
Except A
Outputs for St. Louis A (Phase 3 Solution)
Outputs for St. Louis A-l (Phase 4 Solution)
Outputs for St. Louis B and St. Louis B-1 (Phase
3 Solutions)
Outputs for St. Louis C
Outputs for St. Louis E
Outputs for St. Louis F
Phase 3 Solution
Phase 4 Solution
Phase 3 Solution
Outputs for St. Louis F-l (Phase 4 Solution)
Outputs for St,
Outputs for N. E.
tion)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Outputs for N. E.
Solution)
Louis G (Dynamic)(Phase
Page
131
134
136
137
140
166
170
174
179
183
187
191
3 Solution) 194
207
Massachusetts A (Phase 3 Solu-
Massachusetts A-2 (Phase 4 211
Massachusetts A-3 (Phase 3 215
Massachusetts A-4 (Phase 3 219
Massachusetts B-1 (Phase 4 221
Massachusetts B-2 (Phase 4 223
Massachusetts C-l (Phase 4 225
Massachusetts C-2 (Phase 4 227
Massachusetts C-3 (Phase 4 229
Massachusetts D-l (Phase 3 231
Massachusetts D-2 (Phase 3 233
Massachusetts E-l (Phase 4 235
Massachusetts E-2 (Phase 4 237
239
Outputs for N.
Solution)
CROW-FLY Mode 2 Test (Front-End Only)
IX
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Map Number
1 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 18
Region, Run A
2 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 19
Region, Run A
3 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 21
Region, Run A-l
4 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 22
Region, Run A-l
5 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 24
Region, Run B
6 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 25
Region, Run B
7 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 27
Region, Run B-l
8 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 28
Region, Run B-l
9 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 30
Region, Run C
10 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 31
Region, Run C
11 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 33
Region, Run E
12 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 34
Region, Run E
13 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 36
Region, Run F
14 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 37
Region, Run F
15 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 39
Region, Run F-l
16 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 40
Region, Run F-l
17 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 46
Region, Run 6-1st Period
18 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 47
Region, Run 6-1st Period
19 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 48
Region, Run 6-2nd Period
20 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louts 49
Region, Run G-2nd Period
21 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 50
Region, Run 6-3rd Period
22 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 53
Region, Run 6-3rd Period
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Continued)
Map Number Page
23 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 54
Region, Run G-4th Period
24 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The St. Louis 55
Region, Run 6-4th Period
25 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 64
Massachusetts Region, Run A
26 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 65
Massachusetts Region, Run A
27 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 67
Massachusetts Region, Run A-2
28 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 68
Massachusetts Region, Run A-2
29 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 70
Massachusetts Region, Run A-3
30 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 71
Massachusetts Region, Run A-3
31 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 73
Massachusetts Region, Run A-4
32 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 74
Massachusetts Region, Run A-4
33 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 76
Massachusetts Region, Run B-l
34 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 77
Massachusetts Region, Run B-l
35 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 79
Massachusetts Region, Run B-2
36 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 80
Massachusetts Region, Run B-2
37 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 82
Massachusetts Region, Run C-l
38 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 83
Massachusetts Region, Run C-l
39 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 85
Massachusetts Region, Run C-2
40 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 86
Massachusetts Region, Run C-2
41 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 88
Massachusetts Region, Run C-3
42 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 89
Massachusetts Region, Run C-3
43 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 91
Massachusetts Region, Run D-l
44 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 92
Massachusetts Region, Run D-l
xi
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Concluded)
Map Number Page
45 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 94
Massachusetts Region, Run D-2
46 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 95
Massachusetts Region, Run D-2
47 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 97
Massachusetts Region, Run E-l
48 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 98
Massachusetts Region, Run E-l
49 Flows to Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 99
Massachusetts Region, Run E-2
50 Flows from Initial Offload Point: The Northeastern 100
Massachusetts Region, Run E-2
xii
-------
CHAPTER ]
INTRODUCTION
What to do with the millions of tons of solid waste produced an-
nually throughout the country creates difficult decisions that must be
addressed at local levels. These decisions, which were once rather
straightforward, are now cbmplicated by the increasing costs of disposal,
new technologies, environmental regulations, and the unavailability of
land for landfill. These factors facing local decision makers give rise
to strong pressures towards the regionalization of solid waste manage-
ment functions. However, regionalization itself creates two fundamental
problems: the complexity of the regional system design; and a problem
of political consensus among the participants.
To assist local planners with both of these problems, an optimizing
model has been developed for the generation of minimum cost regional
solid waste management plans. The model is a fixed-charge linear pro-
gramming model, using an algorithm developed by Dr. Warren Walker'.
The model receives as input:
• waste generation data by district (represented as
occurring at a point, or centroid source within that
district)
• possible sites for transfer, processing, and disposal
• possible processes at each site
• a transportation network defining source-to-site and
site-to-site transit times
• process costs (fixed and variable) and flows
• transportation costs (variable costs only).
From these data, the model will generate a comprehensive regional solid
waste management plan, including the selection of sites and processes,
sizing each site, and determining links and flows among sources of waste
generation, processing sites, and disposal sites. The generated plan
will be the minimum cost way of handling all of the wastes while meeting
all environmental, tonnage, and traffic constraints.
By using the model, decision makers can find answers to such ques-
tions as: Which technology should be selected? Where should the fa-
cility and subscribing transfer stations be located? Whom should they
serve? How large should they be? What will a system that meets all the
Barren E. Walker, Adjacent Extreme Point Algorithms for the Fixed Charge
Problem, Dept. of Operations Research, College of Engineering, Cornell
University, January 30, 1968.
1
-------
objectives cost? What are good alternatives and what will they cost? In
sum, what is the most economically preferred regional system design and
what are the costs associated with changing that design?
A key capability of the model is its ability to balance the econ-
omies of scale achievable through centralization of processing at one
location against the additional haul costs required for centralization.
This makes it possible to determine what levels of centralization make
the most economic sense.
The model consists of a series of equations which consider the
sources of solid waste generation over a given planning region, a set
of sites, and processes to be considered at those sites, as well as
various site and process capacity constraints and traffic constraints.
The processes can be transfer stations, resource recovery processes
(including the extraction of recoverable resources to be marketed), sec-
ondary processes (which receive the residue of primary processes as
input) and various disposal processes. The model further considers many
transportation route alternatives from sources of waste generation to
sites, and from sites to sites.
Processing costs are input to the model so as to reflect the econ-
omies of scale available for each process, and revenues from the mar-
keting of recovered materials. Haul costs are included, which increase
directly which both tonnage and travel time.
The model has three essential components:
structure - which assures that each alternative considered
is feasible in the sense that all wastes gener-
ated are entered into transportation, that all
wastes arriving at a site are processed, that
all residues generated are processed at the
site or entered into transportation, that no
process exceeds the indicated tonnage maximums)
and that traffic constraints are observed,
cost - which assures that each alternative is properly
costed, including economies of scale where appropriate,
and
procedure - an organized mathematical procedure which allows
those options which improve the solution to be
separated from those that make it worse, and
indicates when the procedure has identified the
least cost solution.
The model was originally designed in eighteen alternative modes of
operation (nine static modes and nine dynamic modes) under a MITRE-
sponsored research project2. In 1974, a basic static mode of the model
2This design was reported in MITRE Report M73-111, E. B. Berman, A
Model for Selecting, Sizing, and Locating Regional Solid Waste Processing
and Disposal Facilities, October 1973. ' ~~ ~~
-------
was used for a program of operational runs in support of regional design analy-
sis for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This program used manually-generated
inputs to the algorithm, and a manual interpretation of outputs.3 This original
model was known as SWAMP [Soltd WAste Management Planning).
The Systems Management Division, Office of Solid Waste Management Programs,
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, supported the further development of the
model. The EPA project included:
• The development of a computerized preprocessor and postprocessor
for one static mode and one dynamic mode of the model.
• An operational test program on the Greater St. Louis Region (the
City of St. Louis and seven surrounding counties).
• A parametric exercise program on a region of 53 communities of
Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
• Documentation and dissemination.
The version of the model developed for EPA is known as WRAP (Waste Resources
Allocation Program).
The EPA developmental program has been documented in four volumes:
• Executive Summary, includes a brief description of the model
and its application programs. The focus is on the use of the
model to illuminate political and technical issues. (WRAPping
Up The Solid Waste Management Problem: A Model for Regional
Solid Waste Management Planning, M76-207, April 1976.)
• User's Guide, is addressed to the operations research analyst.
It contains a technical description of the model (Chapter 2),
a guide to the preparation of inputs (Chapter 3) and a guide
to the interpretation of outputs (Chapter 4). Chapter 5 con-
tains example inputs and outputs for one static run and for
one dynamic run. Chapter 6 presents the running time experi-
ence for the two run series. Chapter 7 presents a guide to
the design and operation of a model application. (WRAP -A
Model for Regional Solid Waste Management Planning: User's
Guide, MTR-3222, April 1976.)
• Programmer's Manual, contains a full description of the pro-
gram, its flowcharts and its control options. (WRAP - A Model
for Regional Solid Waste Management Planning: Programmer's'
Manual/April 1976.)
a Documentation of Operational and Exercise Runs, presents the
results of the 9 operational test runs and 13 exercise pro-
gram runs. Chapter 2 presents a summary and analysis of the
runs were reported in E. B. Berman and H. J. Yaffe, MTR-2945, Region
Design Analysis for Regional Resource Recovery System for Northeastern
Massachusetts, November 1974.
3
-------
operational and exercise runs. Chapter 3 describes Inputs
and assumptions for both run programs. Chapter 4 presents
tables of processing options offered and selected for each
of the 22 operational and exercise runs. Chapter 5 presents
full numerical outputs of each of the 22 operational and
exercise runs. (WRAP - A Model for Regional Solid Haste
Management Planning:".'.'Documentation of1 Operational and Exer-
cise Runs. MTR-3219, April 1976.)
This volume comprises the documentation of operational and exercise
runs. The other volumes may be obtained by calling or writing:
The Systems Management Division
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street
Washington, D.C. 20460
Telephone: (202) 755-9125.
-------
CHAPTER 2
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE PROGRAM RUNS
This chapter presents a narrative and graphical description of the
St. Louis operational test runs and N.E. Massachusetts exercise program
runs. A complete set of inputs and assumptions for these runs is pre-
sented in Chapter 3 and a complete numerical description of the outputs
of these runs is presented in Chapter 5.
A pair of maps has been prepared for each run, and for each time
period of the one dynamic run. These maps are included in this section
to present a graphical description of the runs. In the pair, the first
presents the flows from each centroid of waste generation to each initial
offload point. The second map in the pair shows the flows from the
initial offload points. The second map also identifies which sites were
selected for processing, and which of these were transfer, primary pro-
cessing, secondary processing and landfill sites. The second map shows
transfer flows, flows from primary to secondary processing, and fuel
flows from primary processing to the market (fuel flows are not shown
for the N.E. Massachusetts runs, since no markets were identified for
those runs).
The St. Louis Operational Test
A region of seven counties and the City of St. Louis was selected
for the operational test.
An earlier study by Sverdrup and Parcel provided much of the data
that were used in this test. The remainder were supplied by the East-
West Gateway Coordinating Council. Waste volumes and most of the waste
generation source and site locations were those identified by Sverdrup
and Parcel; the remainder were identified by the East-West Gateway
Coordinating Council. Centroid sources and sites are displayed on the
map in Figure 1. Transportation activity one-way times between sources
and sites, sites and sites, and sites and markets were estimated by East-
West Gateway Coordinating Council.
The Union Electric company, through its subsidiary, Union Colliery
Company, is planning to install an 8,000 ton per day resource recovery
system using the shredded fuel process (shredding, air classification,
magnetic separation of ferrous metals) which was developed by them. The
St. Louis operational test is designed to illuminate a number of political
issues suggested by the East-West Gateway Coordinating Council. It is
hoped that the information provided by these runs will assist the com-
munities, the Coordinating Council, and the utility by identifying their
Solid Waste Management Plan for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area, Sverdrup
and Parcel and Associates, Inc., St. Louis, June 1974, prepared for the
East-West Gateway Coordinating Council.
-------
Figure 1
THE ST. LOUIS REGION
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY IANDFIU @ UTIIITY
TRUCK TRANSFER © RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
common Interest in working together to implement the resource recovery
system.
The Run Set
The St. Louis region was divided into 29 districts for waste gen-
eration for the static runs and into 8 (seven counties and the City of
St. Louis) for the dynamic run. The districts, centroid locations, and
tonnage generation assumptions are displayed in Figure 2 (static) and
Figure 3 (dynamic).
There were originally a total of seven runs in the set, six static
and one dynamic. One of the static runs was dropped as irrelevant, and
three of the static runs were performed under alternative assumptions,
so that there were eight static runs as actually implemented.
Figure 4 describes the operational test run set as implemented.
Run D was not run because the loss of the Illinois Power Co. market did
not make any cost difference, and hence the case degenerated into the
base case.
The A-l and B-l variants represent primarily a modification in the
assumption on fuel haul. In the original runs, which included runs A
and B, it was assumed that fuel which was produced at off-utility sites
would be trucked to the closest utility location from each site that was
chosen for processing. The model generated a solution in runs A and B
in which all of the fuel was being trucked to the Meramec plant; and in
fact the capacity of that plant to absorb fuel was being exceeded. Be-
cause of excess deliveries to the Meramec plant, and an excess number of
trucks, the assumption was modified; all fuel was to be rail-hauled at
a flat cost of $3.00 per ton of fuel, regardless of destination within the
region. In runs A-l and B-l, rail-haul of fuel was assumed. In addition,
run A-l was a stripped-down version of run A in size, and was run through
phase 47. Both B and B-l were large models (112 equations and 513
activities) and were run only through phase 3 because it did not appear
likely that any additional landfills would improve the solution.
In run F, processing was forced onto the utility locations, with
the Meramec plant being limited to an input of 2,000 tons per day of
raw refuse. After further consultation with Union Electric staff, that
constraint was raised to 4,062 tons per day of raw refuse in run F-l,
representing a 65% utilization of a shredded fuel capacity of 5,000 tons
per day, translated back to raw refuse through a factor of 0.8 tons of
fuel per ton of raw refuse. In addition run F was used as guidance to
strip down the problem in size in order to obtain a phase 4 solution
for F-l.
^In phase 3, a best solution is found among adjacent extreme points; in
phase 4, single forcing is used (one column at a time is forced into the
solution). Phase 4 requires considerable running time for a large
problem, but frequently finds a better solution. The phase 3 runs were
used to guide the stripping of the model for the phase 4 runs.
7
-------
Figure 2
DISTRICT CENTROID LOCATIONS AND TONNAGE
GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE STATIC ST. LOUIS RUNS
SOURCE DISTRICT
101 DISTRICT 1
102 DISTRICT 2
103 DISTRICT 3
104 DISTRICT 4
105 DISTRICT 5
106 DISTRICT 6
107 DISTRICT 7
108 DISTRICT 8
109 DISTRICT 9
110 DISTRICT 10
111 DISTRICT 11
112 DISTRICT 12
113 DISTRICT 13
114 DISTRICT 14
115 DISTRICT 15
116 DISTRICT 16
117 DISTRICT 17
118 DISTRICT 18
119 DISTRICT 19
120 DISTRICT 20
121 DISTRICT 21
122 DISTRICT 22
123 DISTRICT 23
124 DISTRICT 24
125 DISTRICT 25
126 DISTRICT 26
127 DISTRICT 27
128 DISTRICT 28
129 DISTRICT 29
CENTROID LOCATION
TONNAGE OOP TONS PER YEAR
LONG
DEG.IMIN
91 15.80
90 58.20
90 43.00
90 32.50
90 25.80
90 20.30
90 10.80
90 07.60
89 59.50
89 51.10
89 50.10
90 04.10
90 05.90
90 06.00
89 56.90
89 45.20
90 50.40
90 42.80
90 47.90
90 30.70
90 20.60
90 34.30
90 30.50
90 24.30
90 16.80
90 15.60
90 27.10
90 16.40
90 19.50
LAT
DEG.IMIN
38 31 .80
38 25.50
38 18.20
38 25.90
38 18.40
38 08.40
38 22.10
38 36.40
38 33.40
38 32.30
38 15.70
38 27.20
38 42.50
38 52.30
38 55.20
38 44.60
38 40.00
38 48.20
38 52.00
38 47.10
38 53.70
38 37.20
38 31.70
38 43.90
38 44.70
38 38.80
38 37.30
38 34.90
38 31.10
OTHER RUNS
5.9
32.0
4.5
10.9
53.3
1.1
14.9
218.2
86.9
38.2
13.7
9.9
103.5
148.4
16.8
16.7
2.3
35.8
1.1
44.4
3.7
58.1
46.6
147.0
330.9
514.0
67.0
339.8
128.4
ST. LOUIS E
5.1
28.9
4.3
10.3
48.5
1.0
14.1
205.0
74.9
23.3
12.9
8.7
92.0
135.3
15.0
14.5
2.1
33.3
1.0
39.8
3.5
46.8
38.4
122.5
282.1
405.5
52.2
282.4
109.2
*Source: Sverdrup & Parcel, Op. C1t., Source: p. 201.
-------
Figure 3
DISTRICTS, CENTROID LOCATIONS AND TONNAGE
GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE DYNAMIC ST. LOUIS RUN'
DISTRICT
SOURCE 101 FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOURCE 102 JEFFERSON COUNTY
SOURCE 103 MADISON COUNTY
SOURCE 104 MONROE COUNTY
SOURCE 105 ST. CHARLES COUNTY
SOURCE 106 ST. CLAIR COUNTY
SOURCE 107 ST. LOUIS CITY
SOURCE 108 ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CENTROID LOCATION
LONG L"ST~
DEG.JMIN DEG.|MIN
TONNAGE 000 TONS PER YEAR
90 58.2
90 28.1
90 03.1
90 09.8
90 32.7
89 59.5
90 14.6
90 21.4
38 25.5
38 19.3
38 49.7
38 21.1
38 47.1
38 33.4
38 37.2
38 40.1
PERIOD
1
39.1
65.5
280.1
10.2
79.3
358.2
795.3
838.7
2
50.8
90.6
361.7
14.8
114.6
449.1
895.6
1075.3
3
75.9
148.5
539.8
25.1
195.3
636.1
1070.3
1582.2
4
98.80
202.40
702.30
34.80
271.00
803.40
1205.40
2042.20
County centroids were taken from the map in Sverdrup & Parcel, Op. Cit., p. 137. Waste tonnages
were estimated for the years 1978 (for period 1), 1984 (for period 2), 1993 (for period 3) and
1999 (for period 4) using interpolations of Sverdrup & Parcel projection II (Ibid, p. 53) which
assumed a 2% per year growth rate in solid waste generation per capita.
-------
Figure 4
THE ST. LOUIS RUN SET
A, BASE CASE- ALL RESOURCE RECOVERY OPTIONS > A-l VARIANT
B, ADD LANDFILL > B-l VARIA^IT
C. NO INTERSTATE FLOWS
D, LOSS OF IllINOIS POl€R CD. MARKET [NOT RUN-BECAUSE IRRELEMr]
E, HAlf COTfeCIAL TONNAGES
F. PROCESSING FORCED TO UTILITY SITE > F-l VARIANT
G. DVW1IC M
-------
Figure 6
SITES AND SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE STATIC ST. LOUIS RUNS
SITE
501 Ml TRANS
502 M2 TRANS
503 M3 TRANS
504 M4 TRANS
505 M5 TRANS PROC
506 M6 T4 TRANS PROC
507 M7 T5 TRANS PROC
508 M8 T2 TRANS
509 M9 C2 TRANS
510 Ml 0 T6 TRANS PROC
511 Mil Cl TRANS
512 Tl TRANS
513 T3 TRANS
514 Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC
515 U2 LABADIE MKT PROC
605 M5 SECOND PROC
606 M6 SECOND PROC
607 M7 SECOND PROC
610 Ml0 SECOND PROC
614 Ul MERAMEC SECOND PROC
615 U2 LABADIE SECOND PROC
701 Al SULLIVAN MUNICIPAL
702 A2 FRANKLIN COUNTY
703 A5 WEST COUNTY
704 A6 JEFFERSON COUNTY
705 A8 ALTON MUNICIPAL
706 A9 MAL
707 A10 MODERN SANITATION
708 A14 BROWN MARISSA
709 A16 BARTON-ROXANNA
710 A18 ANTONIA
711 A19 VIGUS QUARRY
712 A21 VALLEY DISPOSAL
713 A22 ALTON BRICK
LOCATION
LONG
DEG. 1 MIN
91 01.1
90 00.7
90 06.9
90 33.7
90 12.9
90 16.7
90 08.8
90 20.8
90 42.2
90 30.6
90 14.6
90 25.2
90 11.1
90 19.4
90 52.0
90 12.9
90 16.7
90 08.8
90 30.6
90 19.4
90 52.0
91 08.0
90 56.1
90 31.6
90 25.8
90 11.3
90 10.0
90 01.9
89 47.4
90 00.9
90 25.8
90 28.9
90 24.4
90 24.4
LAT
DEG. | MIN
38 26.6
38 35.5
38 53.6
38 08.9
38 40.1
38 34.9
38 37.7
38 35.5
38 49.7
38 30.8
38 47.9
38 44.7
38 42.6
38 26.0
38 32.4
38 40.1
38 34.9
38 37.7
38 30.8
38 26.0
38 32.4
38 13.5
38 22.0
38 31.6
38 12.6
38 55.6
38 44.9
38 30.8
38 16.1
38 50.5
38 20.5
38 44.7
38 26.3
38 40.0
(FOR ULTIMATE SITES ONLY)
ACRE-FEET AVAILABLE
1000
1000
800
400
500
5000
400
400
500
250
3000
400
1000
-------
Figure 7
PROCESS OPTION S/ST, LOUIS
FOR STATIC RUNS
TRANSFER STAT I ONS
901 PACKER TO TRANSFER VAN
902 PACKER TO CONTAINER
903 PACKER OR VAN TO R,R, CAR
PROCESS I N6
905 PRIMARY
SHREDDING
AIR CLASSIFICATION
MAGNETIC SEPARATION
906 SECONDARY
BU MIES PROCESS
907 SANITARY LANDFILL
14
-------
Figure 8
ST. LOUIS A-1: OFF-SITE PROCESSING (KAIL-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARY
62 ROWS 167 COLUMNS +3 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE' 3599.86506 AVERAGE S/TON: 1.44341
SITE
501
502
503
504
[~505
|j06
PROCESS
[90T1
901
901
1905]
906
SEGMENT
12
13
23
12
23
13
12
23
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL' [SEGMENT)
37.9 (1)
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
4.5 (1)
1240.0 (3)
324.2 (2)
752.0 (2)
'
SITE
pb?
508
509
CIO
10
511
PROCESS
901
906
nan
905
906
901
SEGMENT
23
13
12
23
12
13
13
12
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
502.0
395.2 (3)
87.3 (2)
153.5
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 505/605 TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 506/606
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 9
ST. LOUIS B: LANDFILL ADDED (TRUCK-HAUL OF FUEL) and B 1 -LANDFILL ADDED (RAIL-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARIES
B: OBJECTIVE VALUE.' 31 15.66636 AVERAGES/TON 1.249266
112ROWS, 512 COLUMNS +20 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTIONS „ „„„„
Bl OBJECTIVE VALUE.' 4007.72956 AVERAGE S/TON: 1.60695
SITE
601
502
503
504
505
_fi05
"506
i_fi06
T07
607
508
509
)
510
.610
i
j
PROCESS
L901]
903
1 901
1 901
903
1 901
903
901
903
nioT
|~906'
901
903
fiosl
906
901
903
[ID
906
1 901
903
901
902
901
903
rgosi
906
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL" (SEGMENT)
37.9 (11
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
4.5 (1)
1056.0 (3)
322.6 (2)
V " ""'
725.4 (2)
480.0 (21
258.2 (31
87.3 (21
i 13 j 220.5
13
SITE
511
512
513
514
J514
Tl5
_615
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
PROCESS
901
902
903
903
905
906
905
906
907
907
907
907
907
907
907
nan
907
907
907
907
907
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL' (SEGMENT)
12.1 (11
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS TRUCK CONSTRAINT. 505/605 TRUCK CONSTRAINT. 506/606
"OBJECTIVE VALUE
N THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 10
ST. LOUIS F 1 PROCESSING FORCED ON UTILITY SITES (MERAMEC CAPACITY: 1267I
RUM SUMMARY
75 ROWS 181 COLUMNS +4 SLACKS PHASE 1 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE". 3955.0481 AVERAGE S/TON. 1.5858
SITE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
PROCESS
rao
1 9011
901
fgoT)
901
L9Q3J
1 901 1
903
1 9011
903
l90ll
903
| 901 1
903
SEGMENT
12
13
23
23
12
12
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
37.9 (1)
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
434.4 (3)
349.7 (31
286.8 (31
642.4 (31
SITE
509
CIO
10
511
512
513
114
614
"515
.6.15
PROCESS
HoTl
902
non
903
906
901
902
ran
903
| gog |
| goe'l
I 905 1
1 9061
SEGMENT
12
12
13
13
12
12
12
13
13 -
13
12
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* {SEGMENT)
36.9 (1)
57.5 (2)
262.1 13)
1267.0 (3)
164.7 (2)
1227.0 (3)
159.5 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINT: TONNAGE CONSTRAINT AT 514 (MERAMEC PLANT)
•OBJECTIVE VALUE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS AND CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Map 1
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN A
* DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
ft CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
@ SANITARY LANDHU (y) UTILITY
® TRUCK TRANSFER ® RAU TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 2
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN A
TRUCK TtANSFEl (LOW
1*11 TIAHSFil flOW
FIIMAtr TO SECONDAtir FlOW
FUEL FLOW
o
*
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL
TRUCK TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Run A-1
Run A-1 is a modified resource recovery base case, with landfill
offered only for residue. It differs from Run A in its fuel haul assump-
tion; in run A-1, fuel is rail-hauled to either utility as needed. The
cost of rail-haul, with relatively high costs of loading and unloading,
was assumed to be invariant to distance within the limits of the St.
Louis region.8 In addition, on-site processing, which was offered but
not selected in Run A, was not offered in Run A-1. Runs F and F-l cover
the on-site processing case. Using run A results as guidance, run A-1
was stripped down in size and run through phase 4 to obtain a higher level
of optimization.
Map 3 shows a pattern of flows to first offload point which is quite
similar to that of run A. The district 26 to M5 flow was dropped in run
A-1; and the flow from district 27 was diverted entirely from M10 to M8.
Map 4 shows a more concentrated solution for primary processing.
M10 has been downgraded from primary processing to truck transfer. The
pattern of transfer stations remained unchanged, except for the addition
of M10 providing a transfer flow to both M5 and M6. It should be noted
that the phase 3 solution of run A-1 showed four primary processing cen-
ters, so that the more concentrated solution was directly a result of the
phase 4 processing, with its push towards a higher level of optimization.
8 See Sverdrup & Parcel, Op. Cit., p. 207.
20
-------
Map 3
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN A-l
®'
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
•fr CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
t SANITARY LANDFILL ® UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER ® RAIL TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 4
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN A-1
o
•fr
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL (Jj) UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER © RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Run B
Run B is the resource recovery base case modified to make landfill
available for either raw refuse or residue. As in run A, truck haul of
fuel was assumed, with each processing site linked to its closest utility.
In effect, all fuel went to Meramec, so that this solution is also not
really feasible. It represents a phase 3 solution.
Map 5 shows the pattern of flows to initial offload to be similar to
those of run A, except that part of the flow from district 11 has been
diverted to a landfill, Brown-Marissa (A-14),
Map 6 shows a set of site activations and waste flows identical to
run A, except for the activation of landfill A-14.
The run shows that, when landfill was offered for raw refuse, little
was chosen. The basic shredded fuel process appears to be able to com-
pete with sanitary landfill for the vast bulk (99.5%) of the region's
solid waste.
The use of the Brown-Marissa landfill lowered the system cost by
only four-tenths of a cent per ton.
23
-------
Map 5
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN B
(C)
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL © UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER © RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 6
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS RiGION, RUN B
—^—. TIUCK TIANSFCI FlOW
— — . MIL TtANSFE* HOW
^MMMM PtlmARY TO SECONDARY tLOW
........ FUU FLOW
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
* CITY/"COUNTY CENTROID
(S) SANITA*Y LANDFIll
@ TRUCK TRANSFtH
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
G>
-------
Run B-1
Run B-1 is a version of run B, modified to provide rail haul of
fuel from primary processing to the utilities. As in run B, landfill is
available for both raw refuse and heavy end residue, but was chosen only
at A-14, Brown-Marissa, to provide part of the requirements of District
11.
The numerical solution of run B-1 is identical to run B. This is
reflected in map 7 and map 8, which are identical to maps 5 and 6 except
for the flow of fuel to both utilities in map 8, (and that flow represents
an input assumption, not an output of the run).
26
-------
Map 7
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN B-1
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
•ft CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
@ SANITARY LANDFILL @ UTILITY
® TRUCK TRANSFER © RAIL TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 8
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN B-l
o
*
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTRO1D
CITY/COUNTY CENTROIO
SANITARY LANDFILL
TRUCK TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
UTILITY
© RAIL TRANSFER
-------
Run C
Run C represents the case of no interstate, flows of waste, so that
the region is in effect divided into two, a Missouri portion and an Il-
linois portion.
The most notable result of blocking interstate flows proved to be a
relocation of primary processing from site M5 in run A-l to site M10 in
run C. This appears to have resulted from a shift in the center of gravity
of the Missouri subregion towards the west.
Secondary processing, which was located at MS in run A-l, was es-
tablished at M6, for the Missouri subregion, and at M7 for the Illinois
subregion.
The relocation of primary and secondary processing is displayed on
map 10.
Map 9 shows a pattern of minor adjustments of initial offload points
in response to the changes in primary and secondary processing locations.
There was no need for the model to adjust the flows to initial offload
point because of the constraint against interstate flows since the base
case (i.e., run A-l) showed no interstate flows of raw refuse.
Fuel is assumed to be rail-hauled in run C. In this run only, fuel
from M7 is delivered to the Illinois Power Co. plant in Baldwin, 111.,
and other primary processing plants deliver to the two Union Electric Co.
plants at Meramec and Labadle, as Illustrated in map 10.
29
-------
Map 9
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN C
u>
o
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
•ft- CITr/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL (Lj) UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER 0 RAIL TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
1 I ! ! ( 5 6 T » I 10
-------
Map 10
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN C
> THICK ntANSFtt HOW
IAII TIANSFEt FLOW
, MIM«»r TO SiCONDAlf F1OW
FUCL FLOW
O
ft
®
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFIlt
TRUCK TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Run E
In run E, commercial tonnages, which tend to be heavier in the
central city, were cut in half, representing the effect of non-partici-
pation by a major private solid waste collection firm. The effect on the
solution, as shown in map 12, was to suburbanite the solution. Site M6,
the South St. Louis incinerator site, was dropped, and replaced by site
Mid, in the southwestern suburbs. The North St. Louis incinerator site,
M5, was retained for primary processing, and provided secondary processing
for the full region.
Since rail-haul of fuel is assumed, fuel flows from each primary
processing site to each of Meramec and Labadie.
Map 11 shows some minor adjustments to the changes in primary pro-
cessing sites.
32
-------
OJ
CO
Map 11
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN E
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CCNTROID
•ft- CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
® SANITARY LANDFILL
® TRUCK TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
© UTILITY
© RAIL TRANSFER
-------
Map 12
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN E
to
-F=.
TRUCK 1RANSFER FlOW
«»IL TRANSFF.1 FLOW
PRIMARY TO StCONDAtT FLOW
O
®'
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
•if CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
® SANITARY LANDFILL
® TRUCK TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Run F
In run F, primary processing was forced to the two utility sites,
Meramec and Labadie, with a constraint of 2,000 tons per day at Meramec.
A phase 3 solution was obtained.
Map 13 shows a modified pattern of flows to initial offload points.
Four districts, districts 3, 17, 19, and 22, shipped raw refuse directly
to U2, the Union Electric Plant at Labadie. One district, Illinois dis-
trict 12, shipped raw refuse interstate to M6, the South St. Louis incin-
erator site. Site Tl was introduced for the first time as an initial
offload point.
Map 14 shows a similarly modified pattern of processing and flows.
Perhaps due to the tonnage constraint at Meramec, all primary processing,
and secondary processing also, was concentrated at Labadie.
Transfer haul is largely by rail — a process unused in earlier runs.
Truck transfer was selected only at Ml, M2, M9, and M10, for a total
volume of only 218,100 tons per year, less than 9% of the total tonnage
of the region.
Rail transfer was selected at M3, M5, M6/T4, M7/T5, M8/T2, and Tl,
for a total volume of 2,296,800 tons per year or 92% of the total tonnage
of the region. In one case (M2 to M7, by van; thence to Labadie by rail)
both truck and rail were selected in the volume of 86,900 tons per year,
so that the sum of truck and rail percentages exceeds 100%.
35
-------
Map 13
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN F
A DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
it CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
@ SANITARY LANDFILL @ UTILITY
® TRUCK TRANSFER © RAIL TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 14
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT: THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN F
TIUCK ItANSFCt (LOW
RAIL TIANSFEX FLOW
PtIMARY IO SECONDARY FLOW
FUEL HOW
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
•jr CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
@ SANITARY LANDFILL
-------
Run F-l
Run F-l was a stripped-down version of run F, with a phase 4 solu-
tion.
The maximum tonnage constraint at Meramec was rasied from 2,000 to
4,062 tons per day of raw refuse, based on consultation with Union Elec-
tric staff. The constraint represents a 65% utilization of a shredded
fuel capacity of 5,000 tons per day, translated back to raw refuse
through a factor of 0.8 tons of fuel per ton of raw refuse.
Map 15, shows some modification from the run F pattern of flows to
initial offload points, the major change being the introduction of Ul,
Meramec, as an initial offload point.
Map 16 shows a modified pattern of processing and flows. Primary pro-
cessing takes place at both Ul, Meramec, and U2, Labadie, with the former
at the upper limit of tonnage. Due to the distance between the two plants,
a separate secondary processing plant was selected at each of the two loca-
tions.
Truck transfer was selected at Ml, M2, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, M10, for
a total volume of 1,932,500 tons per year, or 77% of the tonnage of the
region.
Rail transfer was selected at M3 and at Tl, for a total volume of
427,300 tons per year, or 17% of the tonnage of the region.
38
-------
Map 15
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT . THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN F-l
O
•fr
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER 0 RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 16
:F.LOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN F-l
TRUCK TRANSFER FLOW
RAH TRANSFER Flow
PRIMAIT TO SECONDARY FLOW
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL © UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER 0 RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Cross-Analysis of Costs for the Static St. Louis Runs
Perhaps the most significant result of the static St. Louis runs 1s
the narrow range of costs. With reference to figure 5, note that the
largest cost difference is between run F at $1.95 per ton and run B at
$1.25 per ton (4 mills less than run A). Yet even this small difference
of 7Q
-------
Figure 11
SITES AND SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE DYNAMIC ST. LOUIS RUN
SITE
SITE 501 Ml TRANS
SITE 506 M6 PROCESSING
SITE 507 M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
SITE 509 M9 TRANS
SITE 510 M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
SITE 514 Ul MKT/PROCESSING
SITE 711 A19 VIGUS QUARRY
LOCATION
LONG
DEG.I MIN
91 01.1
90 16.7
90 08.8
90 42.2
90 30.6
90 19.4
90 28.9
LAT
DEG. | MIN
38 26.8
38 34.9
38 37.7
38 49.7
38 30.8
38 26.0
38 44.7
(FOR ULTIMATE SITE ONLY)
ACRE-FEET AVAILABLE
20000
-------
Figure 12
PROCESS OPTION S/ST, LOUIS
FOR DYNAMIC RUN
TRANSFER STATION
901 PACO TO TONSKR VAN
£ PROCESSING
955 GAS PYRDLYSIS
955 CQTOI7E OF:
905 PRIMRY PROCESSING, DRY FUEL
906 SECONDARY PROCESSING
BU NINES PRXESS AT J3% OF PRIMARY
907 SAT«TARY LflfJDFILI
-------
The dynamic model provides capacity carryforward and land avail-
ability carryforward in a model which seeks the minimum total (discounted)
cost over the entire planning period. The model is permitted to over-
build capacity in an earlier period in order to allow for growth, and to
abandon one process when a better one comes along. Either of these mea-
sures would be taken if and only if the total system cost were thereby
reduced. In order to permit these two measures, underutilization (S)
activities are provided. If taken in an earlier period, they represent
overbuilding to allow for growth; if taken in a later period, they rep-
resent abandonment of capacity due to economic obsolescence. In Figure
13, which presents the options offered and selected in St. Louis G, both
of these uses of S activities were made; overbuilding to allow for growth
(Process 901 at two locations) and abandonment of capacity due to econo-
mic obsolescence (Process 955, which was a composite of shredded fuel
and secondary processing). In figure 13, K (capacity building) and
S (underutilization) activities are shown. In this figure, the selected
time period rather than the selected process has been boxed.
Note that process 955 was built in the first period, but abandoned
in the second period (requiring S activities in the 2nd and 3rd period
to do so) when gas pyrolysis became available at a favorable price.
Gas pyrolysis (Process 935) was built at two sites, 506 (M6) and
507 (M7), in the second period. The M6 site was expanded in the 3rd period;
the M7 site was expanded in the 4th period; and an additional gas pyroly-
sis site was built in that period at site 510 (M10), to allow for trans-
portation savings in the face of considerably enlarged tonnages. All of
this required considerable rerouting, which is displayed graphically in
the following subsection, and described in full numerical detail in Chap-
ter 5.
A transfer station was built at site 501 (Ml) in the 1st period with
enough capacity for the 3rd period (requiring S activities in the 1st and
2nd periods). A second transfer station was built in the 2nd period at
site 509 (M9) with enough capacity for the 4th period (requiring S activi-
ties in the 2nd and 3rd periods).
Cross-Period Structural Analysis of the Dynamic St. Louis Run
In the dynamic run, a map pair is used to display each of the four
model periods of the run.
Maps 18, 20, 22, and 24 display a time transition of processing
and transfer.
In the first period, a shredded fuel processing plant with secondary
recovery of the heavy end was bought at M6, the South St. Louis Incinerator
site. This was abandoned in the second period, with loss of all unused
capital, when a gas pyrolysis process became available at a very favor-
able price -- $2 per million BTU of pyrolytic gas. Gas pyrolysis was
bought at M6 and M7 in the second period, expanded at M6 in the third
period, expanded at M7 in the fourth period, and an additional plant was
added at M10 in the fourth period.
44
-------
Figure 13
ST. LOUIS G: DYNAMIC RUN. GAS PYHOLYSIS IN 2ND PERIOD
RUN SUMMARY
1 15 ROWS 287 COLUMNS *2 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 178939.3750 DISCOUNTED AVERAGE S/TON: -1.890775
SITE
501
£06
506
507
507
509
510
510
PROCESS
901
935
955
901
935
901
901
935
SEGMENT
13
01
13
13
01
13
13
01
PERIOD .
| 1
2
3
P
4
LJLH
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
rn
3
1
3
4
1
2
3
4
2
3
DD
ACTIVITY LEVEL" (SEGMENT)
K'c 75.9 (2)
98.8 (2)
2226.9 (!)
1220.7 (1)
2466.4 (3)
825.6 (11
6801 (1)
271.0 (3)
407.0 (11
SITE
514
711
PROCESS
•955
907
SEGMENT
13
13
PERIOD
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
ACTIVITY LEVEL' (SEGMENT)
UNDERUTILIZATION IS) ACTIVITIES ARE AVAILABLE FOR EACH
SITE PROCESS IN EACH PERIOD. ONLY SELECTED S ACTIVITIES
ARE LISTED. SEGMENT DOES NOT APPLY
501
501
506
506
509
509
901
901
ass
955
901
901
1
2
2
3
2
3
S's 36.8
25.1
24664
2466.4
156.4
75.7
NO ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS 'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN DISCOUNTED THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OVER PLANNING PERIOD.
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR CAPACITY BUILT IK) OR IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR UNDERUTILIZED IS).
-------
Map 17
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-lsr PERIOD
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROIO
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL © UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER 0 RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 18
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-lst PERIOD
TBUCI lOANSfEO HO0
HAH TBANSHt HOW
puiBAir to sicoHOAor non
full FLOtf
O
•ft
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY lANDFIll ® UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER 0 RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 19
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-2nd PERIOD
O
•fr
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL Q> UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER Q RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 20
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-2nd PERIOD
• IIUCK tlAMSFEl FLOW
. IAIL IIANSriB FLOW
. PHIMAHY TO StCONDAIV FLOW
FUEL FLOW
o
*
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL
TRUCK TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
©
-------
Map 21
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-3rd PERIOD
en
O
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
C DISTRICT CENTROID
•fr CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
® SANITARY LANDFILL
® TRUCK TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
A transfer station was bought at Ml in the first period, with enough
slack capacity to allow for growth through the third period. The station
was replaced with a larger plant in the fourth period (its useful life
had expired at the end of the third period).
A second transfer station was bought at M9 in the second period with
enough slack capacity to allow for growth through the fourth period.
This pattern of plant building, selected by the model to conserve
the intercept costs of capacity expansion, required a period-to-period
adjustment in initial offload points (as displayed in maps 17, 19, 21,
and 23) and in transfer flows (as described in maps 18, 20, 22, and 24).
The Massachusetts Exercise Program
A new set of runs was performed on a slightly modified version of
the same Massachusetts/New Hampshire region studied earlier.9 Zone 1 was
divided into two zones, so that there are 14 zones for waste generation
in total. These zones, their locations, and their tonnages are displayed
in Figure 14. Additional processing locations have been added in the
new zone 14, and in zone 3 (Haverhill), and the St. Louis shredded fuel
process has been made available in Haverhill, Newburyport, Gloucester,
Lowell East, and in the new zone 14 (called South Essex Inner). Other-
wise, all options made available in the earlier Massachusetts runs were
continued.
The run series consists of a base case and four parameter!zations
for a total of 13 runs as follows:
Base Case
Run A Base Case
Base Case Variants A-2, A-3, A-4
Tonnage Variant
Run Bl double tonnage
Run B2 half tonnage
Region Size Variant
Transportation distances use flat earth straight line mea-
surements from longitude and latitude. Average speeds are
as follows:
Run Cl 45 mph
Run C2 20 mph
Run C3 10 mph
9 E. B. Berman and H. J. Yaffe, Op. Cit.
51
-------
Figure 14
DISTRICTS, CENTROID LOCATIONS AND TONNAGE GENERATION
ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE MASSACHUSETTS EXERCISE PROGRAM
CENTROID LOCATION TONNAGE OOP TOMS PER YEAR
DISTRICT LONG LAT PERIOD
DEG.I MIN DEG.| MIN 1
101 SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 70 55.6 42 29.9 189.7
102 LAWRENCE 71 10.0 42 42.1 157.7
103 HAVERHILL 71 04.5 42 46.5 55.7
104 NEWBURYPORT 70 54.9 42 49.2 43.4
105 E CENTRAL ESSEX 70 52.0 42 41.6 12.0
106 GLOUCESTER 70 38.4 42 37.2 45.8
107 LOWELL EAST 71 19.2 42 38.0 129.1
108 LOWELL WEST 71 24.3 42 37.4 33.3
109 LOWELL SOUTH 71 17.0 42 32.5 53.4
110 EAST MIDDLESEX 71 09.3 42 34.6 108.0
111 NEW HAMPSHIRE 71 19.0 42 51.0 115.1
112 RESCO COMMUNITIES 70 58.8 42 26.9 186.0
113 S W CENTRAL ESSEX 70 56.4 42 38.1 11.4
114 SOUTH ESSEX INNER 70 59.0 42 32.9 72.5
Tonnages were doubled for N.E. Massachusetts B-l and halved for N.E. Massachusetts B-2.
-------
Map 22
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-3rd PERIOD
O
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY /COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL @ UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER ® RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 23
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-4th PERIOD
6 DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
O DISTRICT CENTROID
•(, CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
t SANITARY LANDFILL @ UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER 0 RAIL TRANSFER
© TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
Map 24
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT : THE ST. LOUIS REGION, RUN G-4fh PERIOD
01
in
o
A
©
DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY/COUNTY BOUNDARY
DISTRICT CENTROID
CITY/COUNTY CENTROID
SANITARY LANDFILL @ UTILITY
TRUCK TRANSFER Q RAIL TRANSFER
TRUCK CONTAINER TRANSFER
-------
The average speed is used as a numeraire of region size.
Truck Constraint Variant
Run D-l 105,000 trucks per year maximum
Run D-2 40,000 trucks per year maximum
Intercept (Economy of Scale) Variant
Run E-l all processing cost intercepts are
doubled (not including transfer
stations and landfill).
Run E-2 all processing cost intercepts as
above are halved.
Sites for the Massachusetts exercise program are displayed in figure
15 and process alternatives in Figure 16. Note in Figure 16 that there
are two dummy processes, 936, and 946, which permit differentiated reve-
nues for incinerator residue and shredded fuel heavy end residue as they
are generated in the same secondary recovery process (process 906).
Figure 17 displays a summary of the Massachusetts exercise program,
and Figures 18, 19, and 20 display site/process/linear segments offered
and selected for three runs. Run A (all options, base case) Run C-l (CROW-
FLY at 45 mph) and Run D-2 (tight truck constraint). The full set of
options and selections may be found in Section 4.
Analysis
One of the more interesting tradeoffs is in the locating of second-
ary processing (process 906). That process, if located in Lowell (site
607) receives the value of an EPA grant, worth an amortized value of
$634.1 per day. This grant value is lost at all other locations (The
process was offered in Haverhill, site 603, and South Essex Inner, site
614.) In those runs in which transportation cost is low (e.g., the low
tonnage variant run, B-2, and the small region variant, run C-l) the EPA
grant pulls that process to 607 (Lowell). In many other runs, the trans-
portation savings pull the process to 603 (Haverhill) or 614 (Danvers).
A total of four base case variants were run. The Massachusetts re-
gion is like a doughnut, with heavy concentrations of population around
the periphery, and a low-density "hole" in the middle. Because of this,
several variants were run, using alternative starting bases to force the
model to consider alternate solutions around the rim of the doughnut.
The four solutions were close in cost, but the best of them, A-4, the
all-Haverhill solution (sites 503/603), was considered the base case,
and used as the starting basis for all other runs (except run 0-2, in
which a new algorithm for a computer-generated starting basis was tested).
Other variants generated solutions ranging from one to three primary
processing locations, in addition to RESCO operating at its minimum of
600 TPD.
56
-------
Figure 15
SITES AND SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE MASSACHUSETTS EXERCISE PROGRAM
SITE
SITE 501 SALEM INCINERATOR/TR
SITE 502 LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS
SITE 503 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
SITE 504 NEWBURYPORT TR/P30C
SITE 506 GLOUCESTER TR/PROC
SITE 507 LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
SITE 510 EA MIDDLESEX TRANS
SITE 512 RESCO PROCESSING
SITE 514 SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SITE 603 HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV
SITE 607 LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV
SITE 614 SO ESX INR SCDY RECOV
SITE 633 HAV DUMMY INCIN RES
SITE 634 SO ESX DUMMY INCIN RES
SITE 637 LWL DUMMY INCIN RES
SITE 643 HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
SITE 644 'SO ESX DUM HEAVY END
SITE 647 LWL DUMMY HEAVY END
SITE 704 AMESBURY LANDFILL
SITE 705 IPSWICH LANDFILL
SITE 706 GLOUCESTER LANDFILL
SITE 708 LOWELL WEST LANDFILL
SITE 709 LOWELL SOUTH LAI\DFILL
SITE 710 EA MIDDLESEX LANDFILL
SITE 711 NEW HAMPSHIRE LANDFILL
SITE 712 RESCO LANDFILL
SITE 713 SO CTRL ESX LANDFILL
LOCATION
LONG
DEG.j MIN
70 55.6
71 08.3
71 07.3
70 54.9
70 43.3
71 21.4
71 09.2
70 58.8
70 58.7
71 07.3
71 21.4
70 58.7
71 07.3
70 58.7
71 21.4
71 07.3
70 58.7
71 21.4
70 56.9
70 52.9
70 43.3
71 24.2
71 17.0
71 09.3
71 16.0
70 58.8
71 00.0
LAT
DEG.j MIN
42 29.9
42 4?. 8
42 45.7
42 49.2
42 37.1
42 37.7
42 34.6
42 26.9
42 33.6
42 45.7
42 37.7
42 33.6
42 45.7
42 33.6
42 37.7
42 45.7
42 33.6
42 37.7
42 49.9
42 41.0
42 37.1
42 37.4
42 32.5
42 34.6
42 48.0
42 26.9
42 36.2
(FOR ULTIMATE SITE ONLY)
ACRE-FEET AVAILABLE
5000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
-------
Figure 16
PROCESS ALTERNATIVES — MASSACHUSETTS EXERCISE PROGRAM
PROCESS TYPE
SOL TRftlSFER STATION
905
FUEL (ST, LOUIS)
LEVEL
B
906 SEC175PRY PROCESSING C
915 RESCO (INCIERATOR/SM1 REC.) B
PROCESS TYPE
LEVEL
925 DRIED SHfEDDED FUEL (ECOPJEL) B
935 GAS FYROLYSIS
i-iuLiv--iiA
Km-. HEAVY END
907 SAfJITARY LA^JDFILL
917 LffJDFILL OF IflCINERATGR
ESIDUE
R U f! A 0 N L Y;
D
-------
Figure 17
SUMMARY OF MASSACHUSETTS EXERCISE PROGRAM
BASE CASE
TONNAGE
PARAMETERIZATION
CROW-FLY
(REGION SIZE
PARAMETERIZATION)
TRUCK
CONSTRAINT
PARAMETERIZATION
INTERCEPT
PARAMETERIZATION
RUN
A : ALL OPTIONS
A-2: DISPERSED STARTING BASIS
A-3: 514 STARTING BASIS
A-4: 503 STARTING BASIS
B-l : DOUBLE TONNAGE
B-2: HALF TONNAGE
C-1: 45 MPH AV. SPEED
C-2: 20 MPH AV. SPEED
C-3: 10 MPH AV. SPEED
D-l: MEDIUM TRUCK CONSTRAINT;
105,000/year
D-2: TIGHT TRUCK CONSTRAINT;
40,000/year
E-l: DOUBLE PROCESS INTERCEPTS
E-2: HALF PROCESS INTERCEPTS
LAST
PHASE
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
PRIMARY PROCESSING
LOCATIONS
503, 512
503, 507, 512
512, 514
503, 512
503, 512
503, 512
503, 512
503, 512
503, 507, 512, 514
503, 512
503, 507, 512, 514
503, 512
503, 512
SECONDARY PROCESSING
LOCATIONS
614
607
614
603
603
607
607
603
603
603
607
603
603
AVERAGE COST
PER TON
.879
.969
.720
.677
- .742
2.377
-1.549
.238
2.807
.747
2.709
1.479
- .511
512 IS ALWAYS PROCESS 515 (RESCO) AT THE MINIMUM (FORCED) LEVEL. IN RUN D-2, SITE 503 HAS PROCESS 935, GAS PYROLYSIS.
ALL OTHER SITES IN ALL OTHER RUNS HAVE PROCESS 905, SHREDDED FUEL (THE UNION ELECTRIC CO. PROCESS).
-------
Figure 18
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS A: THE BASE CASE (ALL OPTIONS!
RUN SUMMARY
78ROWS 313 COLUMNS + 16 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION: OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 1071.0181 AVERAGE S/TON .879 '.
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
_643
504
506
507
607
637
_647
510
512
PROCESS
rwn
901
r§OSl
925
935
906
936
946
cm
905
935
deD
90S
935
[ 901 1
905
935
906
936
946
1 901 !
F5TTI
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
02
13
01
01
13
13
01
13
13
01
13
13
02
13
01
01
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (31
1032.1 (3)
55.4 11)
45.8 (1)
220.8 (3)
10B.O 12)
186.0 ID
SITE
514
614
634
644
704
705
706
708
709
710
711
712
713
PROCESS
rson
905
925
935
| 9Q6 |
L9361
riari
907
907
907
907
907
907
907
917
907
SEGMENT
13
13
13
02
13
01
01
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
01
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL" (SEGMENT) >
83.9 (2)
i
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (11
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS' NONE
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
01
o
-------
Figure 19
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS C-1: CROW-FLY AT45M.P.H.
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS +7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE": -1886.1833 AVERAGES/TON: -1.5485
SITE
501
502
p03
603
633
LJ543
504
506
I~507
607
637
|_647
I
PROCESS
I 901 1
901
riosl
925
935
906
936
946
901
905
935
floTl
90S
935
I 901 |
905
935
Fgoel
riaei
cnn
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL1 (SEGMENTI
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (3)
45.8 (11
220.8 (31
180.7 (2)
46.5 111
134.2 ID
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
_644
PROCESS
rwi
["•§75*1
[~90T|
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 12)
186.0 ID
72.5 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 20
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS D-2: TIGHT TRUCK CONSTRAINTS
RUM SUMMARY
60ROWS 149 COLUMNS +7 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE": 3299.3506 AVERAGES/TON: 2.7086
SITE
501
502
r~503
603
633
643
504
506
j i
607
| 637
|_647
i
I
PROCESS
rwi
Q»D
90S
925
[935
906
936
946
[901
905
1
935
man
905
935
901
[HO
935
I 906
rae-
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL" {SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
509.9 (3)
112.9 (2)
43.4 |1)
57.8 (1)
495.6 (2)
166.0 (2!
46.5 (11
119.5 (1)
SITE
510
512
B14
614
634
.644
PROCESS
901
DEH
901
| 9051
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL' (SEGMENT)
186.0 ID
423.6 12)
•
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 507/607/637/647; TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 514/614/634/644.
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
Ol
ro
-------
Cross-Analysis of Solution Structures for the Massachusetts Exercise
Program
The solution structures of the thirteen Massachusetts exercise pro-
gram runs are displayed graphically in maps 25 through 50.
The Base Case
Run A
The four base case runs represent a configuration forcing in which
the model was forced to examine major configuration changes which were
close in cost, in order to insure that the very best solution was identi-
fied as the base case. This kind of forcing is a valuable adjunct to the
single activity forcing which was available automatically in a phase 4 sol-
ution.
The initial base case run, run A, generated a solution, illustrated
in map 26, in which all primary processing was located at Haverhill, site
503, except RESCO, site 512, operating at its forced minimum; and second-
ary processing was located in an intermediate location, South Essex Inner,
site 514, receiving incinerator residue from RESCO and heavy end residue
from Haverhill. The shredded fuel process was selected for Haverhill.
Transfer stations were selected in Salem, Newburyport, Gloucester,
Lowell, East Middlesex, and South Essex Inner, with all transfer flows
routed to Haverhill. Sanitary landfill of raw refuse was offered in Run
A, but not selected.
The pattern of flows to initial offload point is displayed in map 25.
63
-------
Map 25
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION RUN A
Disriicf IOUHDAI
lOWN/cir
I1AIE IOUNDA»T
DIHtlCI
D1ITIKI CENTRO
-------
Ol
in
Map 26
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A
-------
Run A-2
Run A-2 was a stripped-down version of run A, generating a phase 4
solution from a dispersed processing advanced starting point. This
stripped-down version was used for all runs in the series except run A.
Map 28 shows a solution with primary processing at Lowell and Haver-
hill, using the shredded fuel process, plus RESCO at its forced minimum
of 600 tons per day. Secondary processing is located at Lowell to take
advantage of the EPA grant available at that site.
Transfer stations were selected at Salem, Newburyport, Gloucester,
East Middlesex, and South Essex Inner.
Map 27 shows a pattern of flows to initial offload points which is
identical to run A.
66
-------
Map 27
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A-2
oitmcr tovNDAi
IOWM/CITV
11*11 KOUKDAtV
DllftKT
DISTEKT CfNtlOlD
-------
Map 28
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A-2
-------
Run A-3
This run was an example of configuration forcing. An advanced
starting point was used with all primary processing in South Essex
Inner, site 514, except for the forced minimum of 600 TPD at RESCO.
A phase 3 solution was obtained with that pattern of primary process-
ing, at a cost slightly preferable to either run A or A-2.
Map 30 displays that pattern of primary processing with secondary
processing collocated at South Essex Inner, and transfer stations in
Salem, Lawrence, Newburyport, Goucester, Lowell, and East Middlesex.
Map 29 shows flows to initial offload points modified from runs A
and A-2 only by the use of the transfer station in Lawrence by Law-
rence, Haverhill, and New Hampshire, and by the shift by S. W. Central
Essex directly to the primary processing plant.
69
-------
Map 29
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A-3
-------
Map 30
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A-3
-------
Run A-4
This run was a second example of configuration forcing. An ad- _
vanced starting point was used with all primary processing in Haverhill,
except for the RESCO minimum, and with secondary processing also in
Haverhill. A phase 3 solution was obtained with that pattern of pro-
cessing which proved to be marginally less expensive than run A-3,
and was thus identified as the base case.
Map 32 displays the above pattern of processing, with transfer sta-
tions selected as in run A.
Map 31 displays a pattern of flows to initial offload point which
is identical to those of run A.
72
-------
Map 31
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A-4
-------
Map 32
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN A-4
_ DISTRICT KMfNDAtY
IOWH/CITV
SIAIf •OUHOAIT
% OIlttKT
ft BlITtlCI C1HIIOID
PIIMAIY HOCtHINO
MCONDAIV NOCESSlNO
O CANIIAIT lAWOFKl
» TRUCK TKANSFfR FLOW
, PRIMAIT TO SECONDARY FLOW, HEAVY END
i PRIMARY TO SECONDARY FLOW, INCINERATOR RESIDUE
-------
The Tonnage Parameterization
Run B-l
In this run all base case source tonnages were doubled. A phase
4 solution was generated which was structurally identical in all res-
pects to the base case. The solution is displayed in maps 33 and 34.
75
-------
Map 33
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTH EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN B-l
OimiCT •OUMOAtY
IOWN/CITT •OUHDA1T
*I*tl iOUHDAlY
DISUICT
DU1IIC1 CfMtlOlD
TUtHIFH
nun AIT noctumo
SfCOMDAIT PIOCISSIHO
UHlfAIT UNOnU
COLLOCATED SOURCE AND OFFLOAD POINT
-------
Map 3(4.
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTH EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN B-l
-------
Run B-2
In this run, all base case source tonnages were halved; and a
phase 4 solution was obtained.
Map 36 displays the processing and transfer solution. Note that
secondary processing, with less haulage costs at Issue, because of re-
duced tonnages, was moved to Lowell to take advantage of the EPA grant
available only at that site. The selection of transfer stations (map 36)
and the pattern of flows to initial offload point (map 35) were Identi-
cal to those of the base case.
78
-------
Map 35
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN B-2
-------
Map 36
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN B-2
s
-------
The CROW-FLY (Region Size) Parameterization
In the CROW-FLY parameterization, transportation distances were
generated from longitude and latitude coordinates using flat-earth
straight-line measurements. Transportation times were then generated
from these measurements and an average speed assumption. A 45 mph speed
was used in run C-l to represent a small region (as compared to the
base case); a 20 mph speed was used in run C-2 to represent a medium
sized region; and a 10 mph speed was used in run C-3 to represent a
large region. All three of the runs were operated through phase 4.
Run C-1: 45 mph speed (small region)
Map 38 shows a solution in which secondary processing was moved
to Lowell. The smaller region size reduced haul costs, relative to
the base case, and thus made the EPA grant, available only in Lowell,
more attractive. In addition, the transfer station at Newburyport
was dropped.
Map 37 shows some changes relative to the base case which resulted
from the smaller region size. Thus Newburyport and E. Central Essex
shipped directly to Haverhill in lieu of the Newburyport transfer sta-
tion; and S. W. Central Essex shipped directly to Haverhill in lieu of
the South Essex Inner transfer station.
81
-------
CD
PO
Map 37
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN C-l
-------
s
Map 38
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN C-l
tmmcr touMDur
ITT KMtNOMT
>1*T[ tOUHDAtT
TRUCK TRANSFER FLOW
PRIMARY TO SECONDARY FLOW, HEAVY END
«•»••••• PRIMARY TO SECONDARY FLOW. INCINERATOR RESIDUE
-------
Run C-2: 20 mph (medium region)
Map 40 shows a solution which is identical to the base case.
Map 39 shows some changes from the base case which might be
considered reflections on the poorer measurement of times between
points in the system. E. Central Essex ships directly to Haverhill
rather than through the Newburyport transfer station, and Lowell South
ships through the East Middlesex transfer station rather than the
Lowell transfer station.
84
-------
Map 39
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN C-2
-------
Map k-0
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN C-2
OimiCT VOUNPAtY
TOWW/CItT •OUMOAir
I»TI lOUNOABT
DISTRICT
* BISHICI CINTIOID
/_ TtANSffl
\ nui*KT Mocfisma
Q SICOMBART HOCEISINO
O 1AMIHKT 1ANDFIU
•IRUCK TRANSFER FLOW
• fRlMAtT TO SECONDARY FLOW, HEAVY END
. PRIMARY TO SECONDARY FLOW, INCINERATOR RESIDUE
-------
Run C-3: 10 mph (large region)
The 10 mph speed in run C-3 generated a decentralized processing
pattern in the region. Map 42 shows that primary processing (using
the shredded fuel process) was selected at Haverhill, Lowell, and South
Essex Inner; and RESCO continues at its forced minimum level of 600
tons per day. Despite the dispersion of primary processing, transfer
stations were still selected at every possible location, even in Law-
rence to ship to nearby Haverhill, and at Salem to ship to nearby South
Essex Inner.
Despite the size of the region, the economies of scale in secondary
recovery were sufficient to retain a centralized location (in Haverhill)
for that process.
The pattern of flows to initial offload point in map 41 shows shorter
distances, reflecting the additional processing and transfer locations.
87
-------
Map lH
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN C-3
DISTRICT NAME
OII1UCT IQUHOAtY
—- II*!! IQVNDAIT
• OltllKf
a Dinner cmiion
/ IIANITER
A niMAtv PIOCISSIHO
D IKOHDMT ftOCISIMO
O SANITAIY LANDFILi
COLLOCATED SOUKE AND OFFLOAD POINT
-------
Map \Z
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN C-3
TIVCK TIANSFEt FLOW
PIIMAIV TO SICOHDAIT FLOW, NEAVY END
TO SECONDAffY FlOW, INCIHEtATOR RESIDU
-------
The Truck Constraint Parameterization
Maximum truck constraints were imposed on Haverhill, Lowell, and
South Essex Inner. In run D-1, the truck constraints were set at
105,000 trucks per year at each site. In run D-2, the truck constraints
were set at 40,000 trucks per year at each site. Both of these runs
were operated only through phase 3.
Run D-1 (Medium Truck Constraint)
Map 44 shows that the truck constraint, operative only at Haver-
hill, was satisfied by introducing an additional transfer station in
Lawrence.
Map 43 shows that Lawrence shipped through its transfer station;
otherwise the solution is the same as the base case.
90
-------
Map 43
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN D-1
-------
Map hk
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN D-l
DISIIICt NAM
K»UNO*tr
TOWH/CItT •OUHOAIY
11*11 tOUNOAIT
I oimici
* •ISTIICI CtNtlOIP
l_ TtANtFIt
_\ PII1MMT NOCEIIINO
Q 1ECOWAIT NOCISIWO
O 1ANIIMT lAHBFILt
TRUCK TRANSFER FLOW
, HIMARV TO SECONDARY FLOW, HEAVY END
, PRIMARY 10 SECONDARY HOW. INCINERATOR RESIDUE
-------
Run D-2 (Tight Truck Constraint^
Map 46 reveals a decentralized pattern of production. Primary
processing was selected at Haverhill, using the gas pyrolysis process;
at Lowell, using the shredded fuel process; at South Essex Inner, using
the shredded fuel process; and at RESCO, operating at the forced mini-
mum level of 600 tons per day. The selection of gas pyrolysis at
Haverhill most likely represents a more favorable cost at the small
scale of operation which was generated at that location (113 thousand
tons per year).
Transfer stations were selected in Salem, Lawrence, Newburyport,
and Gloucester, and secondary recovery was located in Lowell to serve
the entire region.
Map 45 and the transfer flows in map 46 show some irregularities
which result from the tight truck constraint at Lowell. This Includes
the use of the Lawrence transfer station as an offload point for dis-
trict 7 (Lowell East) with a back transfer flow to primary processing
in Lowell. The larger capacity of the transfer vehicle (17 tons assumed)
as compared to the packer vehicle (5 tons assumed) permits the truck
constraint to be met through this unusual set of flows.
93
-------
Map ^5
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN D-2
-------
Map 46
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN D-2
vo
en
-------
Intercept Parameterization
In this parameterization, all base case processing cost inter-
cepts (not including sanitary landfill and transfer stations) were
doubled in run E-l, and halved in Run E-2, to represent the effect of
stronger and weaker economies of scale. Both runs were operated through
phase 4.
Maps 47 and 48 display the results of run E-l, and maps 49 and 50
display the results of run E-2. It will be noted that both E-l and
E-2 solutions are identicial to the base case.
96
-------
Map 4?
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN E-l
-------
10
CO
Map kB
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN E-l
• nut* IIAMSHI new
• rilMAtV IO SKOHDAIIT HOW, HIAVr CND
• mKAlY TO SKONDAIT FlOW, INCmEIAfOt 1ISIOUC
-------
Map 1*9
FLOWS TO INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN E-2
-------
Map 50
FLOWS FROM INITIAL OFFLOAD POINT :
THE NORTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS REGION, RUN E-2
O
O
DISTRICT NAME
South E>M« Ool.
12 RISCO CoBnioi>iri.i
13 South W*ir C.nirol (•>•
14 Sou Ik EIHM Inn.r
OISTIIC1 COUNDAI*
tOWM/cnr BOUNDA
IIATI ftOUNDAKT
OltTtKT
DIS1IK1 CINtlOID
TtAN»II
MT MOCEI
SECOH&ART ntOCIilMO
TRUCK TRANSFER FLOW
MIMAIY TO SKONDARY FLOW, HEAVY END
PRIMARY TO SECONDARY FLOW, INCINERATOR RESIDUE
-------
CHAPTER 3
INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE RUNS
This chapter presents inputs and assumptions for all of the opera-
tional test and exercise runs.
Source Data
Source location and tonnage assumptions are presented as follows:
Table I Static St. Louis Runs
Table II Dynamic St. Louis Run
Table III The Massachusetts Exercise Series
(these are Figures 2, 3, & 14).
The source haul cost in all runs for all sources is $.113 per ton-
minute, representing a 20 cubic yard packer truck with a 3-tnan crew, and
an average between the cost of private and public ownership. This is a
recent MITRE estimate.
Site Data
Site locations and (where applicable) land availability are pre-
sented as follows:
Table IV Static St. Louis Runs
Table V Dynamic St. Louis Run
Table VI The Massachusetts Exercise Series
(these are Figures 6, 11, & 15).
All of these sites were not offered in all of the runs. Chapter 4
presents the site-process-linear segments offered and selected for each
run.
A site preparation cost of -$196,570 was applied to site 607 in the
Massachusetts exercise program runs, representing the annual amortized
value of an EPA grant, available only if process 906 (secondary process-
ing — the Bureau of Mines process) is selected at that site (Lowell,
Massachusetts). Process 906 was the only process offered at that site;
thus the site preparation cost was a convenient way of applying the
grant value to the site-process.
101
-------
o
ro
Table I „
DISTRICT CENTROID LOCATIONS AND TONNAGE GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE STATIC ST. LOUIS RUNS
CENTROID LOCATION TONNAGE 000 TONS PER YEAR
SOURCE DISTRICT LONG LAT OTHER RUNS ST. LOUIS E
DEG.JMIN DEG.JMIN
101 DISTRICT 1 9115.80 3831.80 5.9 5.1
102 DISTRICT 2 90 58.20 38 25.50 32.0 28.9
103 DISTRICT 3 90 43.00 38 18.20 4.5 4.3
104 DISTRICT 4 90 32.50 38 25.90 10.9 10.3
105 DISTRICT 5 90 25.80 38 18.40 53.3 48.5
106 DISTRICT 6 9020.30 3808.40 1.1 1.0
107 DISTRICT 7 90 10.80 3C 22.10 14.9 14.1
108 DISTRICT 8 90 07.60 38 36.40 218.2 205.0
109 DISTRICT 9 39 59.50 38 33.40 86.9 74.9
110 DISTRICT 10 8951.10 3832.30 38.2 23.3
111 DISTRICT 11 89 50.10 38 15.70 13.7 12.9
112 DISTRICT 12 90 04.10 38 27.20 9.9 8.7
113 DISTRICT 13 90 05.90 38 42.50 103.5 92.0
114 DISTRICT 14 90 06.00 38 52.30 148.4 135.3
115 DISTRICT 15 89 56.90 38 55.20 16.8 15.0
116 DISTRICT 16 89 45.20 38 44.60 16.7 14.5
117 DISTRICT 17 90 50.40 38 40.00 2.3 2.1
118 DISTRICT 18 90 42.80 38 48.20 35.8 33.3
119 DISTRICT 19 9047.90 3852.00 1.1 1.0
120 DISTRICT 20 90 30.70 38 47.10 44.4 39.8
121 DISTRICT 21 90 20.60 38 53.70 3.7 3.5
122 DISTRICT 22 90 34.30 38 37.20 58.1 46.8
123 DISTRICT 23 9030.50 3831.70 46.6 38.4
124 DISTRICT 24 90 24.30 38 43.90 147.0 122.5
125 DISTRICT 25 90 16.80 38 44.70 330.9 282.1
126 DISTRICT 26 90 15.60 38 38.80 514.0 405.5
127 DISTRICT 27 90 27.10 38 37.30 67.0 52.2
128 DISTRICT 28 90 16.40 38 34.90 339.8 282.4
129 DISTRICT 29 90 19.50 38 31.10 128.4 109.2
*Source: Sverdrup & Parcel, Op. Cit., Source: p. 201.
-------
Table II
DISTRICTS, CENTROID LOCATIONS AND TONNAGE GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE DYNAMIC ST. LOUIS RUNS*
o
CO
DISTRICT
SOURCE 101 FRANKLIN COUNTY
SOURCE 102 JEFFERSON COUNTY
SOURCE 103 MADISON COUNTY
SOURCE 104 MONROE COUNTY
SOURCE 105 ST. CHARLES COUNTY
SOURCE 106 ST. CLAIR COUNTY
SOURCE 107 ST. LOUIS CITY
SOURCE 108 ST. LOUIS COUNTY
CENTROID LOCATION
TONNAGE 000 TONS PER YEAR
LONG
DEG.JMIN
90 58.2
90 28.1
90 03.1
90 09.8
90 32.7
89 59.5
90 14.6
90 21.4
LAT
DEG-I HIN
38 25.5
38 19.3
38 49.7
38 21.1
38 47.1
38 33.4
38 37.2
38 40.1
PERIOD
1
39.1
65.5
280.1
10.2
79.3
358.2
795.3
838.7
2
50.8
90.6
361.7
14.8
114.6
449.1
895.6
1075.3
3
75.9
148.5
539.8
25.1
195.3
636.1
1070.3
1582.2
4
98.80
202.40
702.30
34.80
271.00
803.40
1205.40
2042.20
County centroids were taken from the map in Sverdrup & Parcel, Op. Cit., p. 137. Waste ton-
nages were estimated for the years 1978 (for period 1), 1984 (for period 2), 1993 (for period
3) and 1999 (for period 4) using interpolations of Sverdrup & Parcel projection II (Ibid, p. 53)
which assumed a 2% per year growth rate in solid waste generation per capita.
-------
Table III
DISTRICTS, CENTROID LOCATIONS AND TONNAGE GENERATION
ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE MASSACHUSETTS EXERCISE PROGRAM
CENTROID LOCATION TONNAGE 000 TONS PER YEAR*
DISTRICT LONG LAT PERIOD
DEG.| MIN DEG.| MIN 1
101 SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 70 55.6 42 29.9 189.7
102 LAWRENCE 71 10.0 42 42.1 157.7
103 HAVERHILL 71 04.5 42 46.5 55.7
104 NEWBURYPORT 70 54.9 42 49.2 43.4
105 E CENTRAL ESSEX 70 52.0 42 41.6 12.0
106 GLOUCESTER 70 38.4 42 37.2 45.8
107 LOWELL EAST 71 19.2 42 38.0 129.1
108 LOWELL WEST 71 24.3 42 37.4 38.3
109' LOWELL SOUTH 71 17.0 42 32.5 53.4
110 EAST MIDDLESEX 7109.3 4234.6 108.0
111 NEW HAMPSHIRE 71 19.0 42 51.0 115.1
112 RESCO COMMUNITIES 70 58.8 42 26.9 186.0
113 S W CENTRAL ESSEX 70 56.4 42 38.1 11.4
114 SOUTH ESSEX INNER 70 59.0 42 32.9 72.5
Tonnages were doubled for N. E. Massachusetts B-l and halved for N. E. Massachusetts B-2.
-------
Table IV
SITES AND SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE STATIC ST. LOUIS RUNS
SITE -PONG —T-ION .AT
-------
Table V
SITES AND SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE DYNAMIC ST. LOUIS RUN
SUE —LONG -CATION ,AT (FOR ULTIMATE SITE ONLY)
DESJ MM DEG.| MIN ACRE'FEET AVAILABLE
SITE 501 Ml TRANS 91 01.1 38 25.8
SITE 506 M6 PROCESSING 90 16.7 38 34.9
SITE 507 M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 90 08.8 38 37.7
o SITE 509 M9 TRANS 90 42.2 38 49.7
SITE 510 M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 90 30.6 38 30.8
SITE 514 Ul MKT/PROCESSIN6 90 19.4 38 26.0
SITE 711 A19 VIGUS QUARRY 90 28.9 38 44.7 20000
-------
Table VI
SITES AND SITE LOCATIONS FOR THE MASSACHUSETTS EXERCISE PROGRAM
SITE —r^—LOCATION — (R)R ULTIHATE SITE ONLY)
DEG?| MIN DEG.|MIN ACRE-FEET AVAILABLE
SITE 501 SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 70 55.6 42 29.9
SITE 502 LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 71 08.3 42 42.8
SITE 503 HAVERHILL PROCESSING 71 07.3 42 45.7
SITE 504 NEVIBURYPORT TR/PROC 70 54.9 42 49.2
SITE 506 GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 70 43.3 42 37.1
SITE 507 LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 7121.4 4237.7
SITE 510 EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 71 09.3 42 34.6
SITE 512 RESCO PROCESSING 70 58.8 42 26.9
SHE 514 SO ESSEX INNER TS/PR 70 58.7 42 33.6
SITE 603 HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 71 07.3 42 45.7
SITE 607 LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 71 21.4 42 37.7
SITE 614 SO ESX INR SCDY RECOV 70 58.7 42 33.6
SITE 633 HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 71 07.3 42 45.7
SITE 634 SO ESX DUMMY INCIN RES 70 58.7 42 33.6
.SITE 637 LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 71 21.4 42 37.7
SITE 643 HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 71 07.3 42 45.7
SITE 644 'SO ESX DUM HEAVY END 70 58.7 42 33.6
SITE 647 LWL DUMMY HEAVY END 7121.4 4237.7
SITE 704 AMESBURY LANDFILL 70 56.9 42 49.9 5000
SITE 705 IPSWICH LANDFILL 70 52.9 42 41.0 1000
SITE 706 GLOUCESTER LANDFILL 70 43.3 42 37.1 1000
SITE 708 LOWELL WEST LANDFILL 71 24.3 42 37.4 1000
SITE 709 LOWELL SOUTH LMDFILL 71 17.0 42 32.5 1000
SITE 710 EA MIDDLESEX LANDFILL 71 09.3 42 34.6 1000
SITE 711 NEW HAMPSHIRE LANDFILL 71 16.0 42 48.0 1000
SITE 712 RESCO LANDFILL 70 58.8 42 26.9 1000
SITE 713 SO CTRL ESX LANDFILL 71 00.0 42 36.2 1000
-------
Process Data
Table VII provides a summary of general information on the proces-
ses used in the operational and exercise runs.- The haul cost of $0.26
per ton minute is a recent MITRE cost estimate representing a 65 cubic
yard truck, one man crew, private ownership, carrying a 17-ton average
load.
Table VIII presents the process costs used in the operational test
and exercise programs.
Process Cost Notes
Process 901, Transfer, Packer to Van
These costs represent a recent (February, 1975) MITRE estimate
based on a critical comparison and cross evaluation of estimates avail-
able in the literature.
Total costs and capital costs were estimated, and operating costs
treated as residual.
Process 902, Transfer, Packer to Container
This process covers packing waste into a container, which is then
trucked to a rail head by flat-bed truck, and transported by rail to
either of the utility sites.
Costs were obtained from Sverdrup and Parcel^ at scales of 300
and 1000 TPD, assuming public ownership and an average speed of 35 MPH.
All costs except a cost per one-way truck mile of $.03215 were in-
cluded in the process cost for process 902. The per truck mile cost was
solved for the numbers of minutes which would generate the correct cost,
and that number of minutes entered at a standard cost per ton-minute of
$.026. Thus, for site 509, a distance of 16 miles to Tl (site 512) was
translated into a cost of $1.0288, which would be generated by a time of
9.8 minutes. The 9.8 minutes was then used with a category 5 transporta-
tion activity to each of 514 (Meramec) and 515 (Labadie). Similarly, a
distance of 14 miles between site 511 and Tl was translated into 7.0 min-
utes, which was entered into a separate category 5 transportation activity
to each of sites 514 and 515.
The total costs were assumed to be 70% operating cost and 30% capi-
tal cost.
100p. Cit., p. 208.
108
-------
Table VII
GENERAL PROCESS INFORMATION
Process
No.
981
902
903
905
906
907
9H
917
925
935
936
946
955
Process
Name
Transfer, Packer
to Van
Transfer, Packer
to Container
Transfer, Packer or
Van to Rail
Shredded Fuel
Secondary Processing
Sanitary Landfill
RESCO (Steam
Rtecov. Indn.)
RESCO. Landfill
Dried Shredded Fuel
Gas Pyrolysis
Dumpy Incinerator
Residue
Oumny Heavy End
Cormosite: Shredded
Fiisl/Sec. Rsc.
New or
Existing
N
N
N
N
N
N
E
E
N
N
N
N
N
Level
A
A
A
B
C
D
3
D
B
B
C
C
B
* Output
by weight
100
100
100
13
0
0
y
0
13
0
100
100
0
Output Haul
Cost
$/ton -minute
.026
.026
NA
.026
-
.026
-
.026
__
.026
.026
"
Density in
Landfill
Ibs/ft3
750
750
750
1000
1200
-
1000
1200
1000
-
Appli-
cation2
S.D.M
S
S
S,«
S.H
S.O.M
M
M
K
D,H
M
M
0
Input
Links2
Source
Source
Source, 901
Source 901, 902.
903
905(S); 936(«);
946 (M)
Source 901, 905
925
Source,. 901
915
Source, 901
Source, 901
915
905, 925
Source, 901
Output
Links2
903, 905, 907,
915. 925, 935, 955
905
905
906(S); 907;
946{M)
-
-
917,936
-
907, 946
-
906
906
-
'Effective density: weight of residue in pounds divided by volume o* residue olus covrr in cuhic f?=t.
2S - St. Louis Static; D • St. Louis Dynamic; u = Massachusetts Exercis<- Proiran
-------
Table VIII
PROCESS COSTS FOB TEE OPERATIONAL TEST AHD EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Slopes are in dollars per ton; Intercepts are In thousands of dollars per year
Process Ho.
901
902
903
905
906
907
915
917
925
935
936
946
955
: Process Name
Transfer, Packer to Van
Transfer, Packer to Container
Transfer, Packer or Van to
Rail
Shredded Fuel Process
Secondary Recovery
Sanitary Landfill
RESCO Process
RESCO Landfill
Dried Shredded Fuel
Gas Pyrolysis
Durnny INC1N Residue
Dummy Heavy End
Shredded Fuel/Secondary
Recovery (Composite)
Segment
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
3
fe
1
1
1
2
3
Capital Slope
.77885
.35962
.12115
1.674
1.518
1.44
2.789942
1.288205
.433975
2.980649
.908084
.441506
1.26
.75
.12
.546875
.36
.2115
0
0
4.5
2.2
1.15
2.21333
0
0
0
3.145
1.072
.54
Capital Intercept
14.0
27.5
54.2
8.1
24.9
60.0
50.15
98.509
194.151
317.0 1
668.0
1098.0
176.7 1
201.5
444.85
8.525
13.95
25.575
0
0
234.0 1
581.25
1026.1
249.6 1
386.83
0
0
493.7
844.7
1299.5
Operating Slope
.66346
.3423
.2875
3.906
3.542
3.36
4.6766
3.526163
3.329862
3.070175
1.874698
1.50641
3.1
1.4
1.08
1.640625
1.08
.6345
5.271
2.76
.46
9.35
4.46667
2.85
5.33967
0
0
0
3.473
2.278
1.688
Operating Intercept
22.0
50.5
66.8
18.9
58.1
140.0
78.807
180.898
239.286
70.0 1
320.0
710.0
155.0 1
372.0
472.75
76.725
125.550
230.175
265.0 1
950.0
0
386.0 1
1247.75
2197.9
374.4 1
705.46
0
0
225.0
475.0
1082.0
The indicated process intercents were doubled in Massachusetts exercise run E-l, and halved in Massachusetts exercise run E-2; in process 935,
segment B, the true interceots (equal to the intercepts in segment A of the process) were doubled for run E-l and halved for run E-2.
2The A segment is the standard segment, entering as segment 1 in St. Louis Dynamic and as segment 2 1n the Massachusetts exercise program.
Segment B is valid only up to 200 tons. It charges the fu-11 cost of a 200 TPD operation as intercept.
-------
Process 903, Transfer, Packer or Van to Rail
This process includes the repacking of waste into a container at a
rail head, and the shipment of the container to either of the utility
sites. The costs were obtained from Sverdrup and Parcel Jl represent-
ing a scale of 9000 tons per week. The costs include $2.30 per ton for
rail haul, independent of distance.
The costs were parameterized for scale, and allocated to capital
and operating cost categories, using the process 901 costs as factors.
Process 905, Shredded Fuel Process
This is the Union Electric process, and includes shredding, air
classification at 80% light/20% heavy, and magnetic separation of fer-
rous metals.
Cost estimates were obtained from Union Electric project staff at
scales of 2,000 and 6,000 tons per day.
Because of sharply differing log linear slopes, the capital and
operating costs were estimated independently-
Process 906, Secondary Recovery
This is the Bureau of Mines incinerator residue process which was,
at the time of the runs, to be demonstrated in Lowell, Massachusetts.
Based on conversations with Raytheon staff, it has been assumed inciner-
ator residue and air classification heavy end are interchangeable as
inputs into this processJ2
The costs for this process were taken from the earlier Massachu-
setts Application.I3 The operating and total costs were estimated, and
the capital costs taken as a residual.
Process 907, Sanitary Landfill
The costs for this process were taken from the earlier Massachu-
setts application. Capital costs were assumed to be 10% of the inter-
cept and 25% of the slope.
Op. Cit., p. 207.
12We were informed that this was the case as long as the heavy end did
not exceed 10% organic matter.
13See E. B. Berman and H. J. Yaffe, Op. Cit., p. 29.
Ill
-------
Process 915, RESCO Process
This process represents a plant now under construction in Saugus,
Mass., for the recovery of steam in a water-wall incinerator. The costs
were estimated by MITRE. Because the process has been coded existing,
only the operating costs have been included.
In this one case, the revenue has been subtracted from the operat-
ing cost slope.
Process 917, RESCO Landfill
This is a special process for the deposit of RESCO residue on a co-
located landfill. The cost of 46£ per residue ton includes haul.
Process 925, Dried Shredded Fuel
This is basically the ECOFUEL process, in which both the heavy end
and the light end are dried. Like process 905, ferrous metal is gener-
ated from the primary process.
Costs have been drawn from the earlier Massachusetts application.!*
Total cost and capital cost estimates were made, and the operating costs
were treated as a residual.
Process 935, Gas Pyrolysis
Segment A in Table VIII is the basic process cost, identified as
segment 1 in St. Louis G and segment 2 in the Massachusetts Exercise
program.
Segment B is a special treatment of the process for low tonnage ap-
plications. Where the tonnage cannot exceed 200 tons per day, which is
a proper minimum tonnage for the process, segment B is assigned. In
this segment, the full cost of operation at 200 tons per day is charged
as intercept cost. At operation below that level, revenue is lost, but
the costs are not reduced. The segment requires constraint to a 200 ton
per day maximum, since tonnages beyond that have no meaning (they would
generate no processing costs). This segment is used in the Massachusetts
exercise program at Newburyport (site 504} and Gloucester (site 506).
Costs were drawn from the earlier Massachusetts application.15 The
costs were allocated 60% to operating cost and 40% to capital cost.
Process 936, Dummy Incinerator Residue
This is a dummy process with zero processing cost. The process
exists to generate a proper revenue (differentiated from heavy end reve-
nue). This process drives process 906, secondary recovery, always at
the same site, for process costs.
14Ibid, p. 28.
15Ibid, p. 28-29.
112
-------
Table IX
RECOVERED MATERIALS, COMPOSITIONS AND VALUES
Material
Shredded Fuel
Ferrous
(No. 2 bundle)
Glass
Aluminum
Other Non-ferrous
Fill
Steam
Shredded Fuel
Gas
Frit
Ferrous
(No. 2 bundle)
Glass
Al uni num
Other Non-ferrous
Fill
Unit
MBTU
Ton
Ton
Ton
Ton
Ton
NA
MBTU
MBTU
Ton
Ton
Ton
Ton
Ton
Ton
Composition. Units Per Tnnnt Tftn
St. Louis
7 MBTU/ton
(78 tons/ton)
.065
.1177
.02308
.0145
.5023
NA
NA
7.44
.22
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mass.
7 HBTU
.065
.1769
.0346
.02308
-
(St. Louis)
Heramec/tabadie
Granite City
Alton
Belleville
St. Louis
St. Louis
[A revenue has been incorpc
7
7.44
.22
NA
.092
.0180
.0120
-
NA
at site
at site
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Market Value i
St. Louis
(delivered)
.30
57.00
40.00
300.00
700.00
2.15
rated into the pr<
NA
2.00
3.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Dollars Per Unit
Mass, (cost of
haul included)
.30
57.00
20.00
300.00
700.00
0 (given away)
cess cost]
.60
1.00
3.00
57.00
20.00
300.00
700.00
0 (given away)
, Process
905
905/925
906/946
906/946
906/946
906/946
915
925
935
935
936
936
936
936
936
Sources: Massachusetts Composition, Ibid., pp. 28-29, except ferrous was raised to .065. St. Louis Composition: Estimates were received
from East-West Gateway Coordinating Council. These appeared high, so that the lesser of that and the Massachusetts composition
was taken in each case, and, except for fuel and ferrous, reduced a further third to allow for loss in air classification, Market
values for Massachusetts were MITRE estimates, and for St. Louis were East-West Gateway Coordinating Council estimates. Union
Electric project staff have suggested that the above aluminum composition and glass market value are excessive for St. Louis.
-------
Table X
HAUL ASSUMPTIONS FOR RECOVERED MATERIALS IN ST. LOUIS RUNS
Table of One-Way Minutes for Truck-Haul
^"^\^ Market
Process ing"""^^
Site ^\^
505/605
506/606
507/607
510/610
514/614
515/615
(Glass)
Alton
12.0
54.7
39.3
75.2
41.0
174.0
(Aluminum)
Belleville
16.0
28.0
2.8
30.8
36.0
144.0
(Ferrous)
Granite City
40.0
24.0
20.5
60.0
28.0
168.0
(Other Non -Ferrous
and Fill)
St. Louis
0
0
12.0
40.0
34.0
132.0
Runs A, B, and G
(Fuel)
Meramec
39.0
34.2
47.9
36.0
0
NA
(Fuel)
Labadie
67.8
60.0
69.0
40.0
NA
0
Not Used
(Fuel)
Baldwin
NA
NA
63.0
NA
NA
NA
The cost of truck haul per ton is $.052 per one-way minute plus $.52 for turn-around time.
Truck haul of fuel to the nearest utility (always Meramec) was used in runs A, B, and G.
Rail haul of fuel at a flat cost of $3.00 per ton (regardless of destination) was used in runs A-l, B-l, C, and E.
Haul of fuel was irrelevant in runs F and F-l.
-------
Table XI
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS FOR OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE RUNS
All Revenues in Dollars Per Ton of Process Input
Runs A,
B, &G
Runs A-1 ,
8-1, C & E
~~~~~~--^^ Sit*
'rocess -^^__^
905 Shredded Fuel Truck Haul
905 Shredded Fuel Rail Haul
906 Secondary Recovery
915 RESCO Process
925 Dried Shreddod Fuel
935 Gas Pyrolysis
936 Dummy Incinerator Residue
946 Dummy Heavy End
955 Shredded Fuel /Secondary
Recovery Composite
{905 revenue plus 133! of
906 revenue for site)
505
605
3.598
3.236
22.426
MA
NA
MA
HA
NA
NA
506
606
3.852
3.291
22.150
NA
NA
15.540
NA
NA
6.732
507
607
3.293
3.302
21.952
NA
NA
15.540
NA
NA
NA
510
610
3.654
3.168
20.947
NA
NA
15.540
NA
N.A
NA
514
614
5 677
21.311
NA
NA
15.540
NA
NA
8.447
515
615
5 203
(fill excluded)
20.363
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All Mass.
5 810
NA
E incorporated
into process cost
7.910
8.100
19.345
30.077
NA
-------
Process 946, Dummy Heavy End
This is a dummy process with zero processing cost. The process
exists to generate a proper revenue (differentiated from incinerator
residue revenue). This process drives process 906, secondery recov-
ery, always at the some site, for process costs.
Process 955, Shredded Fuel/Secondary Recovery Composite
This is a composite representing process 905 plus 13% of process
906 at the same site. The segments have been formed as follows:
Each segment of 955 uses the slopes and intercepts of the
corresponding segment of process 905, and adds to them from
process 906:
955, 1st segment: 1st segment intercepts plus 13%
of 1st segment slopes
955, 2nd segment: 1st segment intercepts plus 13%
of 1st segment slopes
955, 3rd segment: 2nd segment intercepts plus 13%
of 2nd segment slopes.
Revenues
Table IX presents assumptions on composition (units output per
ton input), market location (for St. Louis), and market value. No
market locations were identified for the Massachusetts runs.
Table X presents haul assumptions for recovered materials in the
St. Louis runs. There is no counterpart for the Massachusetts runs.
Table XI presents the final revenues entered into the models.
Constraints
Land-availability constraints have been included under site data.
This subsection describes tonnage and truck constraints.
St. Louis A, B, and B-l
Truck constraints of 150,000 per year were applied at sites:
505/605
506/606
507/607
510/610
and 515/615.
A truck constraint of 56,000 per year was applied at sites 514/
614.
116
-------
St. Louis A-1, C. and E
Truck constraints of 150,000 per year were applied at sites 505/605
and 506/606.
St. Louis F
There were no truck constraints. A tonnage constraint of 624,000
per year was applied at site 514 (Meramec).
St. Louis F-l
Truck constraints of 150,000 per year were applied at sites 505/605
and 506/606. A tonnage constraint of 1,267,000 per year was applied at
site 514 (Meramec).
St. Louis 6
No truck or tonnage constraints.
N.E. Massachusetts
Tonnage constraints for all runs were as follows:
Site 504, Newburyport
Process 935, Gas Pyrolysis, 62,000 tons per year*
Other processes 1,240,000 tons per year
Site 506, Gloucester
Process 935, Gas Pyrolysis, 62,000 tons per year*
Other processes 1,240,000 tons per year
Site 512, RESCO
Process 915, RESCO Process, 465,000 tons per year.
Truck constraints for all runs except D-l and D-2 were applied at
390,000 per year at site:
503/633/643 (Haverhill)
507/637/647 (Lowell)
514/634/644 (Danvers).
For the same sites, truck constraints of 105,000 per year were
applied in run !-l! and truck constraints of 40,000 per year were ap-
plied in run D-2.
*See the discussion of this process under Process data.
117
-------
Transportation Data
The transportation files for all of the operational test and exer-
cise program runs are shown as follows:
Table XII St. Louis A
Table XIII St. Louis A-l and E
Table XIV St. Louis B and B-l
Table XV St. Louis C
Table XVI St. Louis F
Table XVII St. Louis F-l
Table XVIII St. Louis G
Table XIX N. E. Massachusetts A
Table XX all other N. E. Massachusetts runs.
The East-West Gateway Coordinating Council provided all of the one-
way time estimates for the St. Louis runs, and corresponding estimates
were prepared by MITRE for the Massachusetts runs.
An input error crept into the model input, and unfortunately, since
it involved an underestimate of time, the error affected the solution.
The error affects all St. Louis runs except F-l and G. The error has
been corrected by hand calculation in all of the affected runs. Section
5 presents all solution costs and activity levels before and after the
correction (referred to as the District 118 mod.).
The input error affected the transportation files, and is corrected
in the following tables.
The two erroneous transportation entries are:
Entered Correct
Code Origin Origin Process Destination Minutes Minutes
2 118 118 508 0.1 57.0
2 118 118 509 14.0 4.0
Miscellaneous Assumptions
For all static runs, a 20 year planning period was assumed; for St.
Louis G, there were four periods of 3, 10, 7, and 5 years for 25 years
in total. The standard turnaround time (charged for all haul in which
the origin is a site, and included in the haul cost for recovered mate-
rials) was 20 minutes in all runs.
118
-------
Taible XII
TRANSPORTATION FILE, ST. LOUIS
Page 1 of 3
OR 1C
COM si \tm K5T ""
2 101 101 501 30.4
2 101 101 510 127.4
•2 101 101 515 B'-t.S
2 102 102 501 5.,'
2 102 102 510 ' 4i.5
2 102 102 515 24. u
2 103 103 501 96.0
2 103 103 504 32.0
2 103 103 510 97.6
2 103 103 514 60.0
2 103 1<13 515 •>}.;:
2 104 104 508 3*.E
2 104 104 510 I?.!
2 104 104 514 &'">.«
2 105 105 504 34.0
2 105 105 506 6.1
2 105 105 508 74.5
2 105 105 510 44.0
2 105 105 514 16.0
2 106 106 504 36.0
2 106 106 506 46.5
2 106 106 508 47. 8
2 106 106 510 60.0
2 106 106 514 49.6
2 107 107 507 26.0
2 107 107 514 32.0
2 108 108 506 12.0
2 108 108 507 4.0
2 108 108 513 1*.0
2 109 109 502 2--
OR It
001 ii Inn"" Nl11
2 109 109 506 40. .1
2 109 109 507 30.0
2 109 109 513 32.0
2 110 110 502 16.7
2 110 110 506 40.5
2 110 110 507 15.3
2 110 110 513 36. 0
2 111 111 502 64.0
2 111 111 506 l?4.r
2 111 111 507 60.0
2 112 112 502 4S.i
2 112 112 506 24.1
2 112 112 507 30. 0
2 112 112 514 32.0
2 113 113 502 64.0
2 113 113 505 14.0
2 113 113 506 ZS.O
2 113 113 507 17.1
2 113 113 513 8.C
2 114 114 503 0.1
2 114 114 511 23.7
2 114 114 513 27.2
2 115 115 503 17.6
2 115 115 511 46. C
2 115 115 513 100.1
2 116 116 502 1-4.0
2 116 116 507 ?•"?.?
2 116 116 513 48.0
2 117 117 509 40.0
2 117 117 510 68. C
ORIC
" s. Ime KST IMI
2 117 117 512 57. i
2 117 117 515 60. C.
2 113 118 SOS 0.1 l
2
2 IIS 118 509 14.0
2 113 118 510 52.0
2 118 113 512 34.4
2 118 118 515 52.8
2 119 119 509 9.r>
2 119 119 510 24.6
2 119 119 512 44.5
2 119 119 515 36.0
2 120 120 508 42. E
2 120 120 509 14. P
2 120 120 510 37.,?
2 120 120 512 11 .2
2 120 120 515 76.'!
2 121 121 505 5ft. r
2 121 121 509 3'J.?
2 121 121 511 30.9
2 121 121 512 54. r
2 122 122 506 52. fl
2 122 122 500 23.8
2 122 122 510 Id. 3
2 122 122 512 38.4
2 122 122 515 ?2.5
2 123 121 506 23.7
2 123 123 508 19.2
2 123 123 510 1.3
2 123 123 512 2i,.7
2 123 123 514 57.4
1.) District 118
2.) District 118
mod; changed
mod; changed
to 57.0 min.
to 4.0 min.
119
-------
Table XII
Page 2 of 3
OR 1C
f*MU in.— ItCCT Kill
COM si |pwe K8T m
2 123 123 515 ?0.3
Z 124- 124 505 15.2
2 124 124 506 50. B
2 124 124 503 33.4
2 124 124 510 31.4
2 124 124 511 15.0
2 124 124 512 0.1 .
2 125 125 505 8.9
2 125 125 506 33. 'j
2 125 125 508 36.0
2 125 125 511 11.7
2 125 125 512 20. C
2 126 126 505 11. C
2 126 126 506 14.4
2 126 126 508 1C. 9
2 126 126 514 32. ?'
2 127 127 505 25. S
2 127 127 506 28.4
2 127 127 508 IS. 2
2 127 127 510 15.9
2 127 127 512 10.7
2 123 128 505 7.2
2 128 128 506 0.1
2 128 128 508 20.0
2 128 128 514 33.1
2 129 129 506 6.7
2 129 129 508 4.C
2 129 129 510 15.9
2 129 129 514 . 19.2
3 501 901 510 60.0
OR 1C
C8K si|raoc KSI ""
3 501 901 515 21.6
3 502 901 505 25.5
3 502 901 505 27.0
3 502 901 507 10. A
3 502 901 514 58.1
3 503 901 505 29. S
3 503 901 507 40.0
3 503 901 513 36.0
3 503 901 514 88.0
3 504 901 506 . 67.3
3 504 901 510 67.3
3 504 901 514 46.2
3 505 901 506 13.3
3 505 901 510 31. 9
3 505 901 514 39.0
3 505 905 606 13.3
3 505 905 610 31.')
3 505 905 614 39.0
3 5T6 901 5C5 13.1
3 506 901 51P 32.0
3 506 901 514 34.2
3 506 905 605 13.3
3 506 9O5 610 32.0
3 506 905 614 34.2
3 507 901 505 10.3
3 507 901 506 20.0
3 507 901 510 36.0
3 507 901 514 47.1
3 507 905 605 10.3
3 507 905 606 20.0
120
ORIC
6001 si Inoc K8T "IM
3 507 905 610 36.0
3 507 905 614 47.9
3 508 901 505 15.5
3 508 901 506 19.2
3 508 901 510 15.6
3 508 901 514 31.5
3 509 901 505 43.5
3 509 901 506 60.0
3 509 901 508 44.0
3 509 901 510 52.2
3 509 901 512 24.0
3 509 901 515 72.0
3 510 901 505 31.9
3 510 901 506 32.0
3 510 901 514 36.0
3 510 905 605 31.9
3 510 905 606 32 .0
3 510 905 614 36.0
3 511 901 505 3fl.,:
3 511 901 506 37.:.
3 511 901 510 b^.^
3 511 901 512 21. C
3 511 901 514 54.3
3 514 905 606 34.2
3 514 905 610 36.0
3 515 905 610 40.0
4 505 905 703 31.9
4 505 905 706 13.2
4 506 905 703 32.0
4 506 905 706 34.2
-------
Table XII
Page 3 of 3
4
4
out
si |H*
507 905
510 905
4 514 905
4 515 905
5
5
501 903
501 903
5 503 903
5 503 903
5 504 903
5 504 903
5 505 903
5 505 903
5 505 905
5 506 903
5 506 903
5 506 905
5 507 903
5 507 903
5 507 905
5 508 903
5 503 903
5 509 902
5 509 902
5 510 903
5
5
510 903
510 905
5 511 902
5 511 902
5 512 903
DEST Nil
706 30.0
703 0.1
703 36.0
703 40.0
514 -0.1
515 -0.1
514 -0.1
515 -R.I
514 -0.1
515 -0.1
514 -0.1
515 -O.I
605 -0.1
5 14 -0.1
515 -C.I
606 -0.1
514 -0.1
515 -0.1
607 -0.1
514 -0.1
515 -O.I
514 9.1
515 9.«
514 -0.1
515 -O.I
610 -C.l
514 7.7
515 7.3
514 -0.1
rMff ffllv nrftr um
W»l — 1 KST Nil
SI | NOC
5 512 903 515 -0.1
5 513 903 514 -0.1
5 513 903 515 -0.1
5 514 905 614 -0.1
5 515 905 615 -0.1
121
-------
Table XIII
TRANSPORTATION FILE, ST. LOUIS A-l AND E
Page 1 of 2
ORIC
fkftfif , fftf UIU
COW Ip-.., KST MIN
ol jrHvt
2 101 101 501 30.4
2 101 101 510 127.4
2 102 102 501 5.2
2 102 102 510 44.5
2 103 103 501 96.0
2 103 103 504 32.0
2 103 103 510 97.6
2 104 104 508 36.8
2 104 104 510 12.8
2 105 105 504 34.0
2 105 105 506 6.1
2 105 105 508 74.5
2 105 105 510 44.0
2 106 106 504 36.0
2 106 106 506 46.5
2 106 106 508 47.8
2 106 106 510 60.0
2 107 107 507 26.0
2 108 108 506 12.0
2 108 108 507 4.0
2 109 109 502 2.2
2 109 109 506 40.0
2 109 109 507 30.0
2 110 110 502 16.7
2 110 110 506 40.5
2 110 110 507 15.3
2 111 111 502 64.0
2 111 111 506 124.0
2 111 111 507 60.0
2 112 112 502 43.0
OR 1C
coot SI|P»OC MSI ""
2 112 112 506 24.3
2 112 112 507 30.0
2 113 113 502 64.0
2 113 113 505 14.0
2 113 113 506 25.0
2 113 113 507 17.1
2 114 114 503 0.1
2 114 114 511 23.7
2 115 115 503 17.6
2 115 115 511 46.0
2 116 116 502 44.0
2 116 116 507 39.3
2 117 117 509 40.0
2 117 117 510 6b.O
2 118 118 508 0.1 l
2 118 118 509 14.0 2
2 118 118 510 52.0
2 119 119 509 9.5
2 119 119 510 24.8
2 120 120 503 42.8
2 120 120 509 14.0
2 120 120 510 37.2
2 121 121 505 56.0
2 121 121 509 38.2
2 121 121 511 30.9
2 122 122 506 52.8
2 122 122 508 28.8
2 122 122 510 18.8
2 123 123 506 23.7
2 123 123 508 19.2
ORIC
cfl* s. hoc K5T ll1
2 123 123 510 1.8
2 124 124 505 15.2
2 124 124 506 50.8
2 124 124 508 38.4
2 124 124 510 31.4
2 124 124 511 15.0
2 125 125 505 8.3
2 125 125 506 33.6
2 125 125 508 36.0
2 125 125 511 11.7
2 126 126 505 11.0
2 126 126 506 14.4
2 126 126 508 10.9
2 127 127 505 25.5
2 127 127 506 28.4
2 127 127 508 18.2
2 127 127 510 15.9
2 128 128 505 7.2
2 128 128 506 0.1
2 128 128 508 20.0
2 129 129 506 6.7
2 129 129 508 4.0
2 129 129 510 15.9
3 501 901 510 60.0
3 502 901 505 25.5
3 502 901 506 27.0
3 502 901 507 10.8
3 503 901 505 29.8
3 503 901 507 40.0
3 504 901 506 67.8
T.) District 118 mod; changed to 57,0 min.
2.) District 118 mod; changed to 4.0 min.
122
-------
Table XIII
Page 2 of 2
MIC
cw si]me "*
3 504 901 510
3 505 901 506
3 505 901 510
3 505 905 606
3 505 905 610
3 506 901 505
3 506 901 510
3 506 905 605
3 506 905 610
3 507 901 505
3 507 901 506
3 507 901 510
3 507 905 605
3 507 905 606
3 507 905 610
3 508 901 505
3 508 901 506
3 508 901 510
3 509 901 505
3 509 901 506
3 509 901 SOB
3 509 901 510
3 510 901 505
3 510 901 506
3 510 905 605
3 510 905 606
3 511 901 505
3 511 901 506
3 511 901 510
5 505 905 605
5 506 905 606
5 507 905 607
5 510 905 610
Nil
67.8
13.3
31.9
13.3
31.9
13.3
32.0
13.3
32.0
10.3
20.0
36.0
10.3
20.0
36.0
15.6
19.2
15.6
43.5
60.0
48.0
52.2
31.9
32.0
31.9
32.0
38.2
37.6
63.3
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
123
-------
TAble XIV
TRANSPORTATION FILE, ST. LOUIS B AND B-l
Page 1 of 5
OHIO
CODt si IPROC Ksr MIH
1 101 101 701 69. 6
1 101 101 703 72.0
1 102 102 701 32 .4
1 102 102 702 12.0
1 103 103 701 52. 4
1 103 103 702 3'..r>
1 103 103 70* 55. 0
1 103 103 710 44.0
1 103 103 712 53.6
1 104 104 703 U.C
1 104 104 710 43. i
1 104 104 712 20.0
1 105 105 704 8.6
1 105 105 710 2.4
1 105 105 712 17.6
1 106 106 704 !<,.{?
1 106 106 710 2b.6
I 106 IG'i 712 31.9
1 107 107 707 29.8
1 107 107 703 62.0
1 107 107 710 30.6
1 107 107 712 22.4
1 100 1CS 706 28.0
1 108 ine 707 23.0
1 109 109 706 4.6
1 109 109 707 fi.S
1 110 110 706 63. C
1 110 110 707 19.2
1 110 110 703 56.4
1 110 110 709 7P.4
OR 1C
COK SI | PMC MST ""
1 111 111 707 03.7
1 111 111 708 3.2
1 112 112 706 81.0
1 112 112 707 8.8
1 112 112 709 14. C
1 113 113 706 8.3
1 113 111 707 33.0
1 113 113 709 13.8
1 114 114 705 B.C.
1 114 114 706 13.3
1 114 114 709 18.0
1 115 115 705 24. 0
1 115 115 706 42.0
1 115 115 709 1S.C
1 116 116 706 42.1
1 116 116 707 28.9
1 116 116 709 26.2
1 117 117 702 91.9
1 117 117 703 64.0
1 117 117 711 54.0
1 117 117 713 62.0
1 118 118 702 131.2
1 118 113 703 33. 3
1 118 118 711 26.2
1 116 113 71,3 36. 0
1 119 119 702 lO'i.O
1 119 119 703 68. 0
1 119 119 711 47.3
1 119 119 713 41. i
1 120 120 703 38.6
124
OftIC
eo* sihoe K8T "'"
1 120 120 711 10.3
1 120 120 713 22.5
1 121 121 703 47.6
1 121 121 705 £6.4
1 121 121 706 44.0
1 121 121 711 30.0
1 121 121 713 41.0
1 122 122 702 98. o
1 122 122 703 12. .1
1 122 122 711 25.4
1 122 122 713 16.3
I 123 123 702 39.9
1 123 123 703 0.1
1 123 123 711 26(.6
1 123 123 712 18.8
1 123 123 713 19.9
1 124 124 703 29.3
1 124 124 705 38.0
1 124 124 70S, il .r.
1 124 124 711 S.n
1 124 124 713 8.6
1 125 129 705 ?S.n
1 125 125 706 12.9
1 125 125 711 26.4
1 125 125 713 O.I
1 126 126 703 27.4
1 126 126 JOf, 20.0
1 126 126 713 15.2
1 127 127 703 14.6
1 127 127 711 12.9
-------
Table XIV
Page 2 of 5
ORI6 I "
CODE 1 BEST uiv
si |PMC Rb Ml"
1 127 127 712 21.3
1 1Z7 127 713 19.2
1 128 128 703 70.1
1 128 12S 706 36.0
1 128 133 711 4?. 7
1 128 128 712 2S.S
1 128 12B 713 6.0
1 129 129 703 13.3
1 129 129 710 18.6
1 129 129 712 11.2
1 129 129 713 22.2
2 101 101 501 30.4
2 101 101 510 127.4
2 101 101 515 84. R
2 102 1C2 501 5.2
2 102 102 510 44.5
2 102 102 515 i4.r
2 103 103 501 95.0
2 103 103 504 32.0
2 103 103 510 97.6
2 103 103 514 60.0
2 103 1"3 515 53.:?
2 104 1&4 5oa 36. -i
2 104 104 510 12.'
2 104 104 514 60. i
2 105 105 504 34.0
2 105 105 50* 6.1
2 105 1°5 5V>3 74.5
2 105 105 510 44.1
2 105 105 M4 16. r.
out
t801 nJpioc "" •"••
2 106 106 504 36.0
2 104 106 506 46.5
2 106 106 503 47. .i
2 106 106 510 60.0
2 106 10ft 514 49.6
2 107 107 507 26.0
2 107 107 514 32.0
2 101 109 506 12.0
2 108 100 507 4.0
2 108 103 513 10.0
2 109 109 502 2.2
2 109 10? 506 43.0
2 109 109 507 30.0
2 109 109 513 32, n
2 110 110 502 li.7
2 110 110 506 40.5
2 110 110 507 15.3
2 110 110 513 36.0
2 111 111 502 64.0
2 111 111 506 124. ('
2 111 111 507 60.0
2 112 112 502 41. 0
2 112 112 504 24.3
2 112 112 507 30.0
2 112 112 514 3?.0
2 113 113 502 54.0
2 113 113 505 14. f. •
2 113 113 506 25.0
2 113 1H 507 17.1
2 113 113 513 3.0
ORIC
«* -Jfa «T «
2 114 114 503 0.1
2 114 114 511 23.7
2 114 114 513 27.3
2 115 115 503 17.6
2 115 115 511 46.0
2 115 115 513 100.1
2 116 116 502 44.0
2 116 116 507 39.3
2 116 116 513 4f!.0
2 117 117 509 40. C
2 117 117 510 68. 0
2 117 117 512 57. s
2 117 117 515 60.0
2 US 118 5(53 0.1 1
2 118 113 509 14.0
2 118 118 510 52.0
2 11B 113 512 ' 34.4
211811', .5 52. P
2 119 119 509 9.5
2 119 119 510 24.8
2 119 119 512 44.5
2 119 119 515 36.0
2 120 120 503 4?.1
2 120 120 509 14.0
2 120 120 510 37.?
2 120 120 512' 11..'
2 120 120 515 76. 3
2 121 121 505 54.0
2 121 121 509 33.3
2 121 121 511 30.9
1.) District 118 mod; changed to 57.0 min.
2.) District 118 mod; changed to 4,0 min.
125
-------
Table XIV
Page 3 of 5
ORIG
AJMtf L _i--— , fkCCT UIU
eoot SI|PROC MST ""
2 121 121 512 34.0
2 122 122 506 52.3
2 122 122 503 23.3
2 122 122 510 IK.fi
2 122 122 512 3S.4
2 122 122 515 32.5
2 123 123 506 23.7
2 123 123 503 19.2
2 123 123 510 1.8
2 123 1?3 512 26.7
2 123 123 514 57.4
2 123 123 515 30. 3
2 124 124 505 15.2
2 124 124 506 50. 8
2 124 124 503 33.4
2 124 124 510 31.4
2 124 124 511 15.0
2 124 124 512 0.1
2 125 125 505 B.8
2 125 125 506 33.6
2 125 125 508 36.0
2 125 125 511 11.7
2 125 125 512 2P.O
2 126 124 505 11.0
2 126 126 506 14.4
2 126 126 503 10.9
2 126 126 514 32. "3
2 127 127 5?5 T5.5
2 127 127 506 2S.4
2 127 127 505 l'j.2
o«ie
CWI si INK MM "'"
2 1^7 127 510 15.9
2 127 127 512 10.7
2 128 129 505 7.2
2 128 129 506 0.1
2 128 129 508 20.0
2 138 123 514 33.1
2 129 129 506 6.7
2 129 129 508 4.0
2 129 129 510 15. »
2 129 129 514 19.2
3 501 901 510 60.0
3 501 901 515 21.6
3 502 901 505 25.5
3 502 901 506 27.0
3 502 901 507 10. 3
3 502 901 514 5ri.l
3 503 901 SOS 29. S
3 503 901 507 40.0
3 503 901 513 36.0
3 503 901 514 38.0
3 504 901 506 67.8
3 504 901 510 67. S
3 504 901 514 46.2
3 505 901 506 13.3
3 505 901 510 31.9
3 505 905 606 13.3
3 505 901 514 39.0
3 505 905 610 31.9
3 505 905 614 39.0
3 506 901 505 11..?
126
ORIC
"* si Inoe ttST ""
3 506 901 510 32.0
3 506 901 514 34.2
3 506 905 605 13.3
3 506 905 610 32.0
3 506 905 614 34.2
3 507 901 505 10.3
3 507 901 5f>6 20.0
3 507 901 510 36.0
3 507 901 514 47.1
3 507 905 605 10.3
3 507 905 606 20.0
3 507 905 610 36.0
3 507 905 614 47.9
3 503 901 505 15.6
3 508 901 506 19.2
3 50"} 901 510 15. 6
3 508 901 514 31.5
3 509 901 505 43.5
3 509 901 506 60.0
3 509 901 SOB 4't.O
3 509 901 510 52.2
3 509 901 512 2'..0
3 509 901 515 72.0
3 510 901 505 31 .9
3 510 901 506 32.0
3 510 901 514 36.0
3 510 905 605 31.9
3 510 905 606 32. (i
3 510 905 614 36.0
3 51 1 901 505 33.2
3 511 901 506 37.6
-------
Table XIV
Page 4 of 5
ORIG
6001 si |rooe KST "'"
3 511 901 510 f-'.T
3 511 901 51? 21. f-
3 511 901 514 04.3
3 514. 905 606 34.2
3 514 905 610 36.0
3 515 905 610 40.0
4 501 901 701 41. (,
4 501 901 702 17.6
4 501 901 703 60. (J
4 502 901 706 44.0
4 502 901 707 12 .0
4 502 901 70S 77. *
4 503 90V 705 1O.9
4 503 901 706 !<•••'
4 503 901 709 12.0
4 504 901 704 26.4
4 504 901 710 36.0
4 504 901 712 51.3
4 505 901 7C3 31.9
4 505 901 716 13.2
4 505 901 712 33.6
4 505 901 713 ^1-3
4 505 905 703 31.9
4 505 905 70S IS'2
4 505 905 712 33.6
4 505 905 713 21 -3
4 506 901 703 32.0
4 506 901 7C6 34.?
4 506 901 712 1s-9
4 506 901 713 23.9
OftIC
COK S.|PIOCKST Nl11
4 506 905 703 32.0
4 506 905 706 34.2
ORIC
* s.|«ocK8T "IH
4 511 901 713 3'. 2
4 514 905 703 36. C
4 506 ?r.5 71? Ib.'J 4 5K 905 704 34.2
4 504 V,r> 71?! 21.9
4 507 901 7')6 30.0
4 507 901 707 11.9
4 507 901 709 40.0
4 507 905 706 30.0
4 507 905 707 11-9
4 507 905 709 40.0
4 503 901 703 15. &
4 50S 901 756 40.0
4 503 901 712 36.6
4 508 901 713 13.5
4 509 901 703 45.8
4 509 901711 25.5
4 514 905 710 17.1
4 514 905 712 4.^>
4 515 905 702 24.1
4 515 905 701 ^C.C
5 501 903 514 -0.1
5 501 903 515 -0.1
5 503 903 514 -0-1
5 503 903 515 -0.1
5 504 903 514 -° • 1
5 504 903 515 -2.1
5 505 903 514 -0.1
5 505 903 515 -O.I
5 505 905 605 -0-1
4 509 901 713 39.0 ? 5Q6 9Q3 51^ -o.l
4 510 901 702 42.0
4 510 901 703 0.1
4 510 901 711 34.2
4 510 901 712 33.6
4 510 901 713 23-1
4 510 905 702 42.0
4 510 905 703 0.1
4 510 905 711 2"*>2
4 510 905 712 33.6
4 510 905 713 23. >
4 511 901 705 18-°
4 511 901 706 3-9
4 511 901 711 2S.<-
127
5 506 903 515 ~&'1
5 506 905 606 -O.I
5 507 903 514 -0-1
5 507 903 515 -O.I
5 507 905 607 -3'1
5 508 903 514 -0.1
5 508 903 515 -0-1
5 509 902 514 9.8
5 509 902 515 r)-9
5 510 903 514 -1.1
5 510 903 515 -0-1
5 510 905 610 -f.l
5 511 902 514 7.3
1
-------
Table XIV
Page 5 of 5
COOT
MIC
si me
KST
Nil
5 511 902 515
5 512 903 514
5 512 903 515
5 511 903 514
5 513 903 515
5 514 905 414
5 515 905 615
7.3
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-O.I
-o.i
128
-------
Table XV
TRANSPORTATION FILE, ST. LOUIS C
Page 1 of 2
one 1
COM 1 Dfsr HIM
si Irae K m
Z 101 101 501 30.4
2 101 101 510 127.4
2 102 102 501 5.?
2 102 102 510 '.4.'i
2 103 103 501 V'..o
2 103 103 504 3J.O
2 103 103 510 "7.6
2 104 104 508 36.8
2 104 104 510 12. a
2 105 105 504 34.0
2 105 1O5 506 S.I
2 105 105 508 74.5
2 105 105 510 44. P
2 106 106 504 36.0
2 106 106 506 46.5
2 106 106 508 47. S
2 106 106 510 60.0
2 107 107 507 ?6.0
2 108 108 507 4.0
2 109 109 502 2.2
2 109 109 507 30.0
2 110 110 502 14.7
2 110 110 507 15. j
2 111 111 502 64. 0
2 111 111 507 60.0
2 112 112 502 49.0
2 112 112 507 30.0
2 113 113 502 64.0
2 113 113 507 1T.1
2 114 114 503 1.1
jORlt | 1
C"*IL]MOCMM •»•
2 115 115 503 17. *
2 116 116 502 44.0
2 116 116 507 •!.5
2 119 119 510 24.1
2 120 120 -SOS 4>..°
2 120 120 509 !<•..;.
2 120 120 510 37. .1
2 121 121 505 5o.o
2 121 121 509 ?S.e
2 121 121 511 30.9
2 122 122 506 5.!. 3
2 122 122 508 23.1
2 122 122 510 in.M
2 123 123 506 23.7
2 123 123 508 1=>.2
2 123 123 510 1.1
2 124 124 505 15.2
2 124 124 506 50. S
2 124 124 508 31. <•
2 124 124 510 ?l .4
2 124 124 511 15.0
2 125 125 505 1.1
2 125 125 506 33.6
2 125 125 508 3->."
ORIC
m s.|»oe*ST •'•
2 125 125 511 u.T
2 126 126 505 11...
2 126 126 506 14.4
2 126 126 508 10. 'J
2 127 127 505 11.--
2 127 127 506 >i...
2 127 127 'j08 U.^
2 127 127 510 !•>.'>
2 128 128 5(15 7..>
2 128 128 506 <".!
2 128 128 508 20.0
2 129 129 506 6.7
2 129 129 503 4.0
2 129 129 510 15.9
3 501 901 510 an.y
3 502 901 507 10. a
3 503 901 507 40.0
3 504 901 506 67. B
3 504 901 510 67. 3
3 505 901 506 13.3
3 505 901 510 31.9
3 505 905 606 IT. 3
3 505 905 610 31.9
3 506 901 505 13.3
3 506 901 510 32. r
3 506 905 605 13.3
3 506 905 610 32.0
3 508 901 505 15. i
3 508 901 506 19.2
3 508 901 510 15.6
"].) District 118 mod; changed to 57.0 min.
2.") District 118 mod; changed to 4.0 rain.
129
-------
Table XV
Page 2 of 2
M
** S*|
3 509
3 509
3 509
1 510
3 510
3 510
3 510
3 511
3 511
3 511
5 505
5 50*
5 507
5 510
1C
r^i" HIT its
rail
901 505 '.1.5
901 506 60.0
901 510 SZ.Z
901 505 31.9
901 506 32.0
905 605 31.9
905 &Q6 37.. 0
901 505 .TJ.J
901 506 57. A
901 510 63.3
905 605 -';.!
905 606 -0.1
905 6O? -9.1
905 610 -C.I
130
-------
Table XVI
TRANSPORTATION FILE, ST. LOUIS F
Page 1 of 3
ORie 1
COM — ~l Bf ST HIM
si INK K5T w"
2 101 10V 501 30.4
2 101 101 510 127. A
2 101 101 515 84.8
2 102 102 501 5.2
2 102 102 510 44.5
2 102 102 515 24.0
2 103 103 501 96.0
2 103 103 504 32.0
2 103 103 510 97.6
2 103 103 514 60.0
2 103 103 515 53.2
2 104 104 509 36.3
2 104 104 510 12. n
2 104 104 514 60.8
2 105 105 504 34.0
2 1C5 105 504 6.1
2 105 105 509 74.5
2 105 105 510 44.0
2 105 105 514 16.0
2 106 106 504 36.0
2 106 106 506 46.5
2 104 106 503 47.8
2 106 106 510 60.0
2 106 106 514 49.6
2 107 107 507 26.0
2 107 107 514 32.0
2 108 108 506 12.0
2 108 108 507 4.0
2 10T 103 513 13.0
2 109 109 502 2.2
OR 1C
m s.lpioc0"' "'"
2 109 109 506 40.0
2 109 109 507 30.0
2 109 109 313 32.0
2 110 110 502 16.7
2 110 110 506 40.5
2 110 110 507 15.3
2 110 110 513 36.0
2 111 111 502 64.0
2 111 111 506 124.0
2 111 111 507 60.0
2 112 112 502 43.0
2 112 112 506 24.3
2 112 112 507 30.0
2 112 112 514 32.0
2 113 113 502 64.0
2 113 113 505 14.0
2 113 113 506 25.0
2 113 11? 517 17.1
2 113 113 513 3.0
2 114 114 513 0.1
2 114 114 511 23-7
2 114 114 513 27.3
2 115 115 503 17.6
2 115 115 511 46.0
2 115 115 513 100.1
2 115 116 502 44.0
2 116 116 507 39.3
2 116 116 513 4°..0
2 117 117 509 40.0
2 117 117 510 6T..O
ORIC
* 7^o7 KST "«
2 117 117 513 57.6
2 117 117 515 60.0
2 118 118 508 0.1
2 118 118 509 14. n
2 110 118 510 52.0
2 113 113 512 34.4
2 113 113 515 52.3
2 119 119 509 9.5
2 119 119 blO 24.?
2 119 119 512 44.5
2 119 119 515 34. 11
2 12" 120 501 42.1
2 120 120 509 14.0
2 120 120 510 37.2
2 120 120 512 11.2
2 120 120 515 76. S
2 121 121 505 56.0
2 121 121 509 31.?
2 121 121 511 30.')
2 121 121 512 34.0
2 122 122 50A 52.3
2 122 122 503 23-fl
2 122 122 510 IS. a
2 122 122 512 3B.4
2 122 122 515 32.5
2 123 123 506 23.7
2 123 123 50R 19.2
2 123 123 510 1.0
2 123 123 512 26.7
2 123 123 514 57.4
T ) District I IB mod; changed to 57.0 min.
2J District 118 mod; changed to 4.0 min.
131
-------
Table XVI
Page 2 of 3
OH 1C
coot s. |noe K5T ' MIN
2 123 123 515 30.3
2 124 124 505 15.2
2 124 124 506 50.8
2 124 124 503 30.4
2 124 124 510 31.4
2 124 124 511 15.0
2 124 124 512 0.1
2 125 125 505 a. a
2 125 125 50
-------
Table XVI
Page 3 of 3
ICOOf
MIC
si me
KIT
Mil
5 510 903 515
5 511 902 514
5 511 902 515
5 512 903 514
5 512 903 515
5 513 903 514
5 513 903 515
5 514 905 (S14
5 515 905 615
-0.1
7.3
7.3
-0.1
-o.i
-o.i
-o.i
-o.i
-o.i
133
-------
Table XVII
TRANSPORTATION FILE, ST. LOUIS
Page 1 of 2
F-l
OHIO
rniu i L ii tft.T IIIM
COM si [we K8T m
2 101 101 501 20.4
2 1C1 1C1 515 fli.ll
2 102 102 SOI 5.?.
2 1C2 102 515 24-. C
2 103 103 504- 32. C
2 103 103 515 53.2
2 1C*. 104 501 36.5?
2 104 104 510 12. 8
2 105 105 504 34.0
2 105 105 506 S.I
2 105 105 514 16.0
2 106 ICi 504 36>.r>
2 106 106 506 46.5
2 1C5 1C6 514 49.*,
2 107 107 507 26.0
2 107 107 514 32.0
2 1C8 103 506 12.0
2 103 103 507 4.0
2 103 10S 513 1S.O
2 1C"} K'r 502 2.2
2 109 109 507 30. f
2 110 110 502 16.7
2 IK. 110 507 15.3
2 111 111 502 64.0
2 111 111 507 60.0
2 112 112 506 24.3
2 112 112 507 30. C
2 113 113 535 14.0
2 113 113 507 17.1
2 114 114 503 0.1
ORIC
COK SI | PMC ^ ""•
2 114 114 ill 23.7
2 114 114 513 27.3
2 115 115 503 17.6
2 115 115 511 46.0
2 115 115 513 1C0.1
2 116 116 507 39.3
2 114 116 513 43.0
2 117 117 515 60. 0
2 IIS 118 509 4.0
2 11? US 512 34.4
2 113 119 515 52.6
2 119 119 509 9.5
2 119 119 515 36.0
2 12? 120 5C9 14.0
2 120 12C 512 11.2
2 120 120 515 76. i)
2 121 121 509 3<3.2
2 121 121 512 34.0
2 1J2 122 510 IS. 6
2 122 122 515 22.5
2 123 123 510 1.6
2 123 123 515 ?C'.3
2 124 124 510 31 .4
2 124 124 512 O.I
2 125 125 505 8.8
2 125 125 511 11.7
2 12$ 126 505 11. C
2 126 126 506 14.4
2 126 126 503 10.5
2 127 127 51C 15.9
134
omc
COK si Imc KST "'"
2 127 127 512 10.7
2 123 123 506 0.1
2 126 128 503 20.0
2 128 12S 514 j3.1
2 129 129 50& 5.7
2 129 129 i>06 4.0
2 129 129 510 15.9
2 129 129 514 19.2
3 501 901 515 21.6
3 502 901 507 10.3
3 502 901 51<> 53. 1
3 5C2 901 505 29.5
3 533 901 507 40.0
3 504 901 5CS 67. 3
3 504 901 51C 67.B
3 504 901 514 46.2
3 505 901 514 39.0
3 50!> 901 515 67.3
3 506 901 514 34.2
3 5C
-------
Table XVII
Page 2 of 2
one
eo* si |me •"
3 51C 901 515
3 511 901 505
3 511 901 512
3 511 9C1 514
3 514 905 61C
3 515 905 61C
5 5C3 903 514
5 503 903 515
5 504 903 514
5 504 903 515
5 505 903 514
5 505 903 515
5 506 903 514
5 505 903 515
5 5C-7 903 514
5 507 903 515
5 503 903 514
5 5C3 903 515
S 505 902 514
5 509 902 515
5 510 903 514
5 510 903 515
5 511 9C2 514
5 511 902 515
5 512 903 514
5 512 903 515
5 513 9C3 514
5 513 903 515
5 514 905 614
5 515 905 615
Nil
40.0
•..8.2
21.0
54.?
36.0
40.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0 . 1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-Ci.l
-0.1
-0.1
9.3
9.3
-0.1
-0.1
7.3
7.3
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
135
-------
Table XVIII
TRANSPORTATION FILE FOR ST. LOUIS 6
Page 1 of 1
MIC
m S| j^ KIT
1 103 103 711
1 105 105 711
1 106 108 711
2 101 101 501
2 102 102 506
2 102 102 510
2 102 102 514
2 103 103 506
2 103 103 507
2 104 104 506
2 104 104 507
2 105 105 506
2 105 105 509
2 105 105 510
2 106 106 506
2 106 106 507
2 107 107 506
2 109 108 506
2 108 108 510
3 501 901 506
3 501 901 510
3 507 901 506
3 507 901 510
3 507 901 514
3 509 901 506
3 509 901 510
3 510 901 506
3 510 901 514
4 509 901 711
4 510 901 711
Hit
48.0
14.3
25.0
6.0
45.0
52.0
25.0
47.2
43.0
28.0
29.0
51.8
18.0
41.2
40.0
30.0
12.0
23.9
23.9
92.0
60.0
20.0
36.0
47.9
60.0
52.2
32.0
36.0
25.5
34.2
136
-------
Table XIX
TRANSPORTATION FILE FOR N. E.
Page 1 of 3
MASSACHUSETTS A
ORU
CQM si |noe KST ""
1 101 101 7G6 32.2
1 101 101 710 35.1
1 101 101 71? 15.9
1 K.; 102 710 1. ;
1 1C7 107 710 2?.. 2
I 107 107 713 33-4
1 1C3 K'6 7f3 2.0
1 103 10* 709 13.=
1 113 1^3 710 26. .1
1 103 1CS 713 42.9
OR It
Mlf firtT um
0111 SIJPIOC KSr "'"
1 1C-? i:9 7C5 13. ft
1 1C3 109 709 2.1
1 109 109 710 !«,.?
1 109 101) 713 37.?
1 llfi 110 7"»9 If. 5
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 7 1 'j i.r-
1 110 110 713 21.0
1 111 111 711 -?.:
1 113 lir. 7Ci 3S.i
1 113 113 705 I?.*
1 113 113 7 Si 24.4
1 113 113 7K- ^'••.•>
1 113 113 71'. 12.3
1 114 114 704 I1" •
1 114 114 710 .'2.6
1 114 114 713 11. '•>
2 101 101 501 !.<»
2 ini 101 srj v:.i
2 101 101 5l:: 13. '•'
2 101 101 514 i:.7
2 102 102 5C2 i-1"'
2 10,? 102 503 13.-"
2 102 1C2 507 ?'-.i
2 102 152 514 33.5
2 103 103 502 1^.1
2 103 123 5C3 11.2
2 1C3 103 5O4 24.7
2 103 103 507 35.1
2 103 103 514 32.4
Z 104 134 50i' 30.0
137
ORIC
"• ii |me KST "I1
2 104 104 5C3 2">.2
2 104 104 504 2.0
2 104 104 514 24.5
2 105 1G5 501 42.8
2 1O5 105 M3 41.4
2 1C5 105 504 Z4.7
2 105 105 506 20.7
2 105 105 514 ii.l
21C'j!Ch5C: 37.7
2 106 106 503 63.4
2 104 106 504 'il .5
2 ir.A 106 JOA 7.5
2 106 106 i!4 31. f
2 K7 107 502 21. t
t 107 107 503 25.4
2 117 107 507 1.7
2 K'7 107 514 42. /
2 10- 102 507 24.9
2 ICi 103 5C-3 25-?
2 108 108 507 *•?
£ IOS 108 514 47.3
2 109 109 502 24.=-
2 109 109 5C3 29-9
i 1C9 109 6C7 12.2
2 109 109 510 16.?
; 1C? 109 514 ?1.C
2 110 110 50? 17.5
2 IK, 110 503 23.5
2 in 110 507 25.3
2 1 1 0 1 1 .1 5 1 0 2.0
-------
Table XIX
Page 2 of 3
OR 1C
COM I KSl NIN
si |mc
2 110 110 512- ' 32.4
2 110 110 514 24.?
2 111 111 502 25.4
2 111 111 503 25.9
2 111 111 507 37. "6 26.".
2 114 114 507 48.0
2 114 114 512 20.9
2 114 114 514 4.3
? 501 901 50> 53.5
3 5*1 501 516 32.6
3 501 931 507 61.0
3 501 901 5K 2C.-1
3 50?. 901 503 Z.2
3 502 901 50'. 30. 0
3 53J 901 507 23.3
3 50..' 901 514 3fl.)
•
ORIC
"" s.l PMC ** m
3 5C3 305 644 35.3
3 503 90S 647 23.3
3 5C3 925 644 35.3
3 503 925 647 2=.3
3 504 901 503 2S.?
3 504 901 506 45. 0
3 5C4 901 507 50.";
3 504 901 514 24.9
3 Sn4 905 64? 26. 1'
3 304 905 644 24. '7
3 504 905 647 5C .i
3 506 901 50?, 57.°
3. 506 901 504 46. C
3 50i 901 507 66.0
2 "Pi 9nl 514 24.5
3 5C.i 905 643 57."
3 5C.i 905 A4«, 24. i
2 506 «05 647 St.r.
3 50-J1 901 sr;- 2?. i
3 507 901 5.14 in.-:
3 sr,7 901 514 42. r^
3 50? 905 64?. 2,1.3
3 c/!37 905 644 i,.-i.r
3 510 9CI 5C-'3 22.-;
3 510 901 507 24.?.
3 510 901 014 24. n
3 51i 915 t?.3 b?. .0
3 512 9i"> 634 2':. I
3 512 o;^ 647 5l-£)
3 514 -701 503 35.*
138
ORIC
"* SIJNM •* ""
3 514 901 5C7 4J ..'•
3 *i\<- 90S 643 35.3
3 514 905 647 42.0
3 514 925 643 ' 35. ^
3 514 925 647 42. n
4 501 901 705 45.6
4 501 901 706 32.6
4 501 901 710 36.5
4 iOi 901 704 20. C
4 5C2 901 708 24.9
4 50.? -T;I 709 24.9
4 502 ->r. 1 710 17.5
4 5J2 501 713 26. T
4 50T- 905 7O4 16.1
4 50i 905 710 22.3
4 5.0^ 905 713 30, r-
4 503 925 704 16.1
4 503 925 710 2i.5
4 503 925 71? 30. r.
4 504 9JJ1 704 in,o
t 504 901 705 2«.5
4 'i.-ii. 901 713 26.9
4 504 905 70^ 1C. 5
4 ST4 905 705 2S.5
4 504 905 713 26.9
4 506 9C1 704 <,b.O
4 506 901 705 24. 5
4 5T6 901 706 2.0
4 506 901 713 3C.7
4 ii-,6 905 704 46.0
4 Wi 905 705 24.5
-------
Table XIX
Page 3 of 3
out
m si |mc "" "'"
4 iC6 905 706 ? .C
4 506 935 711 30. 7
4 5D7 901 7 ,*•'.• 4.';.! I
4 507 901 7 13 B.7 i
4 507 ?C1 7'.* U ..:
4 5r>7 9C1 7!C 25.'.)
4 507 501 713 41.4
4 br7 905 7-4 4i-.l
4 V, 7 5.-.:; 7.-.'; i.7
4 507 •>-.'-: 709 I::..:
4 ^07 9c:> 710 .'.'5.:-.
/, 5--T •)'•=, 71" -iil.-'-
4 M." 911 7'? ."•'-•'
It -U'1 '?T1 7r'5 I-').'1
4 11C •:•-!. 710 i.C
<, 51C 501 71." Jl-1"
4 ii-'r v^: 7" '^i;''-
4 5»<» 901 7'S ^-».9
4 M4 ''il 7-'-i ":•'•«''
4 5^ ".'I 7i.-. .-:-.''
4 -J14 9^! 713 ?•'
4 r.i4 <;.-5 70'- •;5-;-
4 :i!4 9'"r. 7Cb ?•;. •
i .,-..-, ^-)--, 7-', ?*••*•
i il- ^O^ 71^ 2-'"1
4 514 ?"•> 7n •'•-
4 51 A ?-'5 7C" i5''
4 514 925 7f5 2'-?
4 514 925 706 ?-'^
i. 514 -j:!* 71' r'";'
4 ••>!--, vr:i 71? *•-
si|n«c
5 5rt3 905 i*3 -0.1
5 5^3 925 i.43 -O.I
5 507 9" 5 647 -r'-l
5512^1571- —0.1
5 514 'SO* fc44 -0.1
5 514 9?5 e44 -0.1
5 633 934 ftr'3 ~'"1
5 624 ?:* 614 -O.J
5, ',37 vii if.-' -"• 1
S i43 94n ir,2 -u.l
5 i<>4 't6 ''14 ~0-1
5 S47
-------
Table XX
TRANSPORTATION FILE FOR N. E. MASSACHUSETTS RUNS EXCEPT A
CODE
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
ORICII
101
101
102
102
102
103
103
103
104
104
104
105
105
105
105
106
106
105
106
1?7
107
107
109
103
105
109
lf>9
109
109
110
110
11C
no
111
111
111
11?
113
113
113
113
114
114
114
501
501
501
501
502
502
PROCESS
101
101
102
102
102
103
103
103
104
104
104
105
105
105
105
106
106
106
106
1C7
107
107
108
108
108
109
109
109
109
110
110
110
110
111
111
111
112
113
113
113
US
114
114
114
901
901
901
901
901
901
SITE BEST
501
514
5C2
503
5i4
502
503
514
503
504
514
5C2
504
5O6
514
503
504
506
514
502
503
5U7
503
507
514
503
507
510
514
502
5O3
"310
514
502
503
507
512
50.3
504
506
514
503
507
514
503
506
507
514
503
504
INI
1.40
lc.,70
6. CO
13.00
ij.50
15.10
11.20
3Z.4C
26.20-
;.co
24.90
41.40
24.70
20.70
26.10
63.40
51.50
7.50
31.00 '
20.40
2S.4C
B.70
29.90
4.70
47.30
29.90
1^.20
it., ea
31.80
17.50
22.50
2.00
24.90
25. 60
25. "30
37.90
20.00
39.30
2i.lO
24.40
10.30
37.60
4S.CO
4.30
53.50
32.60
63.80
20.20
3.20
30.00
COK
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
^
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
MKII
502
502
503
503
503
503
504
504
504
5C4
504
504
504
504
506
506
505
SOS
50ft
506
507
507
507
507
5fi7
510
51.1
510
512
512
512
514
514
514
514
514
514
50 3
5C 5
507
514
514
633
634
637
643
644
647
pMcm
901
901
905
905
925
925
9C1
901
901
90 t
905
905
9C5
901
901
901
901
905
905
S>C5
901
901
901
9f:5
905
901
901
401
915
915
915
901
901
905
905
025
925
905
925
905
905
925
936
936
936
944
946
946
SITE K$T
507
514
644
647
644
647
503
506
507
514
643
644
647
503
504
507
514
643
644
647
5P3
504
514
64)
6't4
503
S07
514
633
634
637
503
507
643
647
643
647
643
643
647
644
64-4
6O3
614
i07
6C3
614
607
DIN
Z.-..30
30.30
35.30
2E.?0
25.30
26.30
26.20
4A.OO
50.20
24.90
26.20
24.90
5C.2C
57.90
46. OO
56.C.C
24.50
57.90
24.50
56.00
23.30
50.20
'•'!- .00
it,. 30
42.00
2,1.50
24.30
2 '..HO
52.90
23.10
51.60
35.30
42. CO
35.30
42.00
35.30
42. CO
-3.10
-o.io
-0.10
-0.10
-0.10
-C.10
-0.10
-3.10
-o.io
-o.io
-0.10
140
-------
The average payload of a packer truck in all runs was 5 tons (enters
into truck constraints).
The average payload of a van in all runs, was 17 tons (enters into
truck constraints).
In the dynamic run (St. Louis G) the inflation rate was 6% (entered
as 1.06) and the discount rate was also 6% (entered as 1/1.06, or .943).
In the three CROW-FLY runs of the Massachusetts exercise program,
the factor, nautical miles per minute of longitude, was .75. The average
speeds were 45 mph (run C-l); 20 mph (run C-2) and 10 mph (run C-3). One
additional run was executed through the front-end only to test CROW-FLY
mode 2 (maximum radius). For this run, in which the generated transporta-
tion file is presented in Section 5 of this volume, the following assump-
tions pertain:
1. The basic input deck was the N.E. Massachusetts run A deck,
except:
a. process 907 was added at site 712
b. process 917 was added at site 711
c. the provided transportation file included only the
type 5 transportation activities of N.E. Massachu-
setts run A.
2. The factor, nautical miles per minute of longitude was .75.
3. The maximum radius was 15 miles
4. The average speed was 45 mph.
141
-------
CHAPTER 4
PROCESS OPTIONS AND SELECTIONS FOR THE
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EXERCISE PROGRAMS
This section presents single page run summaries for each of the
22 operational test and exercise program runs, focusing on the proces-
sing options offered and selected. These are figures 21 through 41.
In the static runs (i.e., all runs except St. Louis G) the pro-
cessing options are site, process and linear segment,* and the sel-
ections are activity levels (and linear segment selected in parentheses).
For clarity, the selected site-process is boxed.
System cost in thousands of dollars per year and average cost per
ton are included.
All active constraints are identified.
In the dynamic run (St. Louis G) processing options are site, pro-
cess, linear segment, and time period for capital building or for under-
utilization, and the selections are activity levels (and linear segment
selected in parentheses). In the dynamic run, the selected time period
has been boxed for clarity.
* A linear segment of 13 means 1 through 3.
143
-------
Figure 21
ST. LOUIS A: THE BASE CASE (TRUCK-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARY
90 ROWS 325 COLUMNS + 9 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 3123.97856 AVERAGES/TON: 1.25260
SITE
501
502
503
504
505
,£.05
Toe
_fi06
507
PROCESS
1 901
903
_flQl
901
903
| 901
903
901
903
905
906
901
903
jisoir
906
901
903
I 905
906
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
37.9 (1)
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
4.5 (1)
1056.0 (3)
324.2 (2)
725.4 (2)
492.1 (2)
SITE
508
509
510
610
511
512
513
ftl4
614
515
1,6.15
703
706
PROCESS
1 901 ]
903
I 901 1
902
901
903
[ 9051
906
901
902
903
903
905
906
905
906
907
907
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
258.8 (3)
- 87.3 (2)
220.5 : (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 505/605 TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 506/606
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 22
ST. LOUIS A-1: OFF-SITE PROCESSING (RAIL-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARY
62 ROWS 167 COLUMNS <• 3 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE* 3599.86506 AVERAGE $,'TON: 1.44341
SITE
501
502
503
504
505
605
"506
606
PROCESS
901
I906J
901
1 905 |
906
SEGMENT
12
13
23
12
23
13
12
23
13
12
1
\
j
!
j
i
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
379 (1)
86 9 (2)
1652 (3)
4.5 (1)
1240.0 (3)
324.2 (2)
752.0 (2t
SITE
pso?
508
509
CIO
10
511
[
PROCESS
901
906
Him
905
906
901
SEGMENT
23
13
12
23
12
13
13
12
12
j
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
5020
395.2 (3)
87.3 (2)
153.5
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 505/605 TRUCK CONSTRAINT. 506/606
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 23
ST. LOUIS B: LANDFILL ADDED (TRUCK-HAUL OF FUEL) and B-1, LANDFILL ADDED (RAIL-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARIES
B: OBJECTIVE VALUE:* 3115.66636 AVERAGE $/TON: 1.249266
112 ROWS, 512 COLUMNS + 20 SLACKS, PHASE 3SOLUTIONS
B-1: OBJECTIVE VALUE:* 4007.72956 AVERAGE $/TON: 1.60695
SITE
501
502
503
504
505
_£05
506
_ed6
507
607
508
509
"510
jno
PROCESS
CM]
903
LJOJL
| 901
903
cue
903
901
903
L9051
[~90lF
901
903
f 905
906
901
903
[ 9Q5
906
[ 901
903
901
902
901
903
| 905^
906
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
37.9 (1)
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
4.5 (1)
1056.0 (3)
322.6 (2)
725.4 (2)
480.0 (2)
258.2 (3)
87.3 (2)
220.5
SITE
511
512
513
P514
614
Tl5
[_615
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
PROCESS
901
902
903
903
905
906
905
906
907
907
907
907
907
907
907
Riof!
907
907
907
907
907 . ..
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
12.1 (1)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 505/605 TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 506/606
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 24
ST. LOUIS C: NO INTERSTATE FLOWS (RAIL-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARY
61 ROWS 146 COLUMNS + 3 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE:* 4586.66967 AVERAGES/TON 1.839083
SITE
501
502
503
504
fibs
L605
rare
l_606
PROCESS
Hi
905
906
901
L3QL1
LaosD
SEGMENT
12
13
23
12
23
13
12
23
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT!
37.9 (1|
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
4.5 (1)
579.5 (3)
1573.7 (3)
237.5 (2)
SITE
[507
L607
508
509
[Tio
LglO
PROCESS
1 901 I
901
RioTl
906
SEGMENT
13
12
23
12
13
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
667.2 <2I
86.7 (1)
541.9 (3)
86.2 (2)
253.1
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 505/605 TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 506/606
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 25
ST. LOUIS E: HALF COMMERCIAL TONNAGE (RAIL-HAUL OF FUEL)
RUN SUMMARY
62ROWS 167 COLUMNS + 3 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE:* 3703.10966 AVERAGE S/TON: 1.752455
SITE
501
502
503
504
-505
J05
f~5b6
|_606
PROCESS
901
LifiL
901
901
901
[905]
rioTi
905
906
SEGMENT
12
13
23
12
23
13
12
23
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
34.0 (1)
74.9 (2)
150.3 (3)
4.3 (1)
, ~
1499.1 (3)
274.7 (2)
336.2 (3)
SITE
[~507
607
508
509
pio
[eio
511
PROCESS
901
1 905|
906
1 90 1~|
901
901
f 905 j
906
901
SEGMENT
23
13
12
23
12
13
13
12
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
484.5 (2)
566.9 (3)
80.2 (2)
129.5 (1)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINT: TRUCK CONSTRAINT AT 505/605
"OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
00
-------
Figure 26
ST. LOUIS F: PROCESSING FORCED ON UTILITY SITES (MERAMEC CAPACITY: 624)
RUN SUMMARY
75 ROWS 254 COLUMNS+2 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE": 4865.9449 AVERAGE $/TON 1.951062
SITE
501
502
503
504
505
CD6
96
507
PROCESS
HOD
903
I 901 I
901
[agQ
901
903
901
1 903 I
901
I 903 I
906
901
I 903 I
SEGMENT
12
12
13
23
23
12
12
23
23
23
23
12
23
23
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
37.9 (1)
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
434.4 (3)
404.1 (3)
388.6 (3)
SITE
508
509
C10
10
511
512
513
G14
14
R15
1_S15
PROCESS
901
FgoTl
| 901 j
902
903
906
901
902
HJoTI
903
905
906
I 905J
906
SEGMENT
23
23
12
12
13
13
12
12
12
13
13
13
12
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
642.4 (3)
35.8 (1)
57.5 (2)
262.1 (3)
2494.0 (3)
324.2 (2)
NO ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVEL AND CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 27
ST. LOUIS F-1: PROCESSING FORCED ON UTILITY SITES (MERAMEC CAPACITY: 1267)
RUN SUMMARY
en
0
75 ROWS 181 COLUMNS + 4 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 3955.0481 AVERAGE $/TON: 1.5858
SITE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
PROCESS
rioTi
901
901
L9JJ3J
I 901 1
903
1 901 1
903
903
| 901 1
903
SEGMENT
12
13
23
23
12
12
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
37.9 (1)
86.9 (2)
165.2 (3)
434.4 (3)
349.7 (3)
286.8 (3)
642.4 (3)
SITE
509
CIO
10
511
512
513
514
|_614
J15
PROCESS
I 901 1
902
RioTl
903
906
901
902
I 903 I
903
raps']
I 9061
rsosi
SEGMENT
12
12
13
13
12
12
12
13
13
13
12
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
36.9 (1)
57.5 (2)
262.1 (3)
1267.0 (3)
164.7 (2)
1227.0 (3)
159.5 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINT: TONNAGE CONSTRAINT AT 514 (MERAMEC PLANT)
'OBJECTIVE VALUE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS AND CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 29
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS A: THE BASE CASE (ALL OPTIONS)
RUN SUMMARY
78ROWS 313 COLUMNS + 16 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION: OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 1071.0181 AVERAGE $/TON .879
SITE
501
502
pOS
603
633
L§43
504
506
f~507
607
637
l_647
510
512
PROCESS
nan
901
1 905 1
925
935
906
936
946
fgoT)
905
935
| 90 fj
905
935
| 901 j
905
935
906
936
946
I 901 1
SEGMENT
13
13
13
13
02
13
01
01
13
13
01
13
13
01
13
13
02
13
01
01
13
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (3)
55.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
220.8 (3)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
SITE
514
614
634
644
704
705
706
708
709
710
711
712
713
PROCESS
CBD
90S
925
935
1 806_|
run
|~§4T
907
907
907
907
907
907
907
917
907
SEGMENT
13
13
13
02
13
01
01
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
01
13
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
83.9 (2)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
"OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 28
ST. LOUIS G: DYNAMIC RUN, GAS PYROLYSIS IN 2ND PERIOD
RUN SUMMARY
CJ1
— 1
115ROWS 287 COLUMNS +2 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: - 178939.3750 DISCOUNTED AVERAGE $/TON: -1.890775
SITE
501
506
506
507
507
509
510
510
PROCESS
901
935
955
901
935
901
901
935
SEGMENT
13
01
13
13
01
13
13
01
PERIOD
2
3
oq
UU
4
ULJ
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
3
dD
1
3
4
1
2
3
4
2
3
ACTIVITY LEVEL' (SEGMENT)
K's: 75.9 (2)
98.8 (2)
2226.9 (1)
1220.7 (1)
2466.4 (3)
825.6 (1)
680.1 (1)
271.0 (3)
407.0 (1)
SITE
514
711
PROCESS
955
907
SEGMENT
13
13
PERIOD
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
UNDERUTILIZATION (S) ACTIVITIES ARE AVAILABLE FOR EACH
SITE PROCESS IN EACH PERIOD; ONLY SELECTED S ACTIVITIES
ARE LISTED. SEGMENT DOES NOT APPLY.
501
501
506
506
509
509
901
901
955
955
901
901
1
2
2
3
2
3
S's: 36.8
25.1
2466.4
2466.4
156.4
75.7
NO ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS "OBJECTIVE VALUE IN DISCOUNTED THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OVER PLANNING PERIOD;
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR CAPACITY BUILT (K) OR IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR UNDERUTILIZED (S).
-------
Figure 30
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS A-2: BASE CASE
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 1179.8943 AVERAGE $/TON: .96864
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
L643
504
506
507
607
637
647
PROCESS
|90lJ
901
| 905")
925
935
906
936
946
|9or}
905
935
r§6T]
905
935
901
[90S |
935
I 906 I
I 936 j
GEE!
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3|
657.5 (2)
55.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
374.6 (2)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
I
SITE ! PROCESS
510
512
514
614
634
644
RioTI
[HTF)
rWT]
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
83.9 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
* OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 31
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS A-3: BASE CASE WITH ALL 514 STARTING BASIS
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 877.3237
SITE
501
J502
503
603
633
J43
504
506
^07
607
637
.£47
PROCESS
QoD
I 901 |
905
925
935
906
936
946
IjKfQ
905
935
T9Q1 I
905
935
[ 9Q1 j
905
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
328.5 (3)
43.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
220.8 (3)
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
J544
AVERAGES/TON: .720239
PROCESS
901
915
901
905
925
935
-90S.
936,
946
SEGMENT
23
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT) .
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
1
t
1032.1 (3)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS:
"OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 32
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS A-4: BASE CASE WITH ALL-HAVERHILL STARTING BASIS
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 825.0811 AVERAGE $/TON .677351
SITE
501
502
JT03
803
633
|_643
504
; 506
jib?
607
637
ISP
I
I
PROCESS
Lion
901
r905~)
925
935
| 906 J
CUD
1 946 1
[ioTl
905
935
[901 1
905
935
T901J
905
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (3)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
55.4 (H
45.8 (1)
220.8 (31
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
J>44
PROCESS SEGMENT
ED
| 915)
r9oT|
905
925
935
906
936
946
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
| ACTIVITY LEVEL" (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
83.9 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 33
N. E. MASSACHUSETTS B-1: DOUBLE TONNAGE
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: -1807.6484 AVERAGE S/TON: -.7420
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
643
504
506
S07
PROCESS
CUD
901
flos]
925
935
I 906 1
| 9361
ngio
1901 1
905
935
| 9Q1 [
905
935
[ 901 |
905
935
607 906
637
647
936
946
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
379.4 (3)
2064.2 (3)
361.3 (2)
93.0 (1)
268.3 (1)
110.8 (2)
91.6 (2)
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
441.6 (3)
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
644
PROCESS
can
Grub
| 901 j
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
216.0 (3)
372.0 (2)
167.8 (3)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
"OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
CJI
en
-------
Figure 3^
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS B-2: HALF-TONNAGE
RUN SUMMARY
Ol
^
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 1448.4475 AVERAGE S/TON: 2.3768
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
643
504
506
j"507
607
637
PROCESS
doD
901
1906 |
925
935
906
936
946
| 901]
905
935
1.901]
90S
935
1 9QJ]
905
935
[906,71
1 936J
-'
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
94.9 (2)
516.4 (2!
27.7 (1)
22.9 ft)
1 10.5 (2)
90.4 (1)
23.3 H)
67.1 (1)
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
J544
PROCESS
ClioTI
nrnn
r§on
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
54.0 (2)
93.0 (1)
42.0 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 35
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS C-1: CROW-FLY AT 45 M.P.H.
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: -1886
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
j§43
504
506
507
607
637
647
PROCESS
| 901
901
I 905
925
935
906
936
946
901
905
935
| 901
905
935
1 901
905
935
LjQfiJ
936
946
I
I
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (3)
45.8 (1)
220.8 (3)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
SITE
510
512
Tl4
614
634
_644
.1833 AVERAGES/TON: -1.5485
PROCESS
901
915
901
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
72.5 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 36
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS C-2: CROW-FLY AT 20 M.P.H.
RUN SUMMARY
• — — — . . 1
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 289.6099 AVERAGES/TON: .2378
SITE
501
502
libs
603
633
L§43
504
506
[507
607
637
[647
PROCESS
QBD
901
rios]
925
935
rsioT
I 936
Cm
nJbT|
905
935
1 901
905
935
raoT
905
935
906
936
946
!
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (31
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
43.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
167.4 (3)
SITE
510
512
"514
614
634
J344
PROCESS
HoD
r9TJn
Qjjrn
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
161.4 (3)
186.0 (1)
83.9 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
•OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 37
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS C-3: CROW-FLY AT 10 M.P.H.
RUN SUMMARY
60ROWS 148 COLUMNS +7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 3419.1289 AVERAGE S/TON: 2.8069
SITE
501
502
603
603
633
643
504
506
507
607
PROCESS
dsD
poTI
1 9051
925
935
1 906 1
I 936 )
| 9461
rioTi
905
935
1 901 1
905
935
901
[ 905 1
935
906
637 936
JS47
946
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
157.7 (3)
371.9 (2)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 (1)
43.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
220.8 (2)
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
J44
PROCESS
RioTl
nrnr)
901
QMS]
925
935
906
936
946
*
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
439.4 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
"OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 38
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS D-1: MODERATE TRUCK CONSTRAINTS
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 149 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 910.2827 AVERAGES/TON: .7473
01
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
_§43
504
506
i
[To?
607
637
PROCESS
USD
I 901
nioir
925
935
906
936
.946.
r90T
905
935
rioT
905
935
| 901
905
935
906
936
647 ! 946
I
j
]
]
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
157.7 (31
1032.1 (3)
180.7 (2)
46.5 (1)
134.2 > (1)
55.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
220.8 (3)
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
J44
PROCESS
RioTl
["9JIT)
| 9Q1 |
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (1)
83.9 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINST: NONE, BUT TRUCK CONSTRAINT AT 503/603/633/643 CAUSED 501/901 TO ENTER THE SOLUTIONS
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 39
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS D-2: TIGHT TRUCK CONSTRAINTS
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 149 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 3 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 3299.3506 AVERAGE $/TON: 2.7086
SITE
501
JJ02
503
603
633
643
504
506
507
607
637
647
PROCESS
Par
fsoT
905
925
r93s~
906
936
946
pro?
905
935
rwn
90S
935
901
rsoT
935
906
•gag
94g*
I
I
I
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL' (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3|
509.9 (3)
112.9 W
43.4 (1)
57.8 (11
495.6 (2)
166.0 (2)
46.5 (1|
119.5 (1)
SITE
510
512
"514
614
634
J44
PROCESS
901
| 915)
901
[90S]
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
186.0 (1)
423.6 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 507/607/637/647; TRUCK CONSTRAINT, 514/614/634/644.
"OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure k-0
IM.E. MASSACHUSETTS E-1: DOUBLE INTERCEPTS
RUN SUMMARY
en
CO
60 ROWS 148 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: 1802.0232 AVERAGE $/TON: 1.4794
SITE
501
502
503
603
633
L§43
504
506
["507
607
637
Lfi47
PROCESS
OKI
901
1 905
925
935
906
_33§.
1 946
[901
905
935
nioT
905
935
I 901
905
935
906
936
946
]
3
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (2)
180.7
46.5
134.2
55.4 (1)
45.8 (1)
220.8 (3)
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
644
PROCESS
[JOT]
["9T5"|
pSoT|
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (2)
83.9 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
-------
Figure 4l
N.E. MASSACHUSETTS E-2: HALF INTERCEPTS
RUN SUMMARY
60 ROWS 14 COLUMNS + 7 SLACKS PHASE 4 SOLUTION OBJECTIVE VALUE*: -622.7158 AVERAGES/TON: -.5112
SITE
501
_502
503
603
633
J43
504
506
B07
607
637
647
PROCESS
Hffl
901
I 905 1
925
936
BSD
1 936 1
1 £46 j
[ jadi*}
90S
935
| 9Q1 |
905
935
| 9011
905
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
12
12
01
12
12
01
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTI V ITY LEVEL * (SEGM ENT)
189.7 (3)
1032.1 (3)
180.7 (2|
46.5 (11
134.2 (1)
55.4 (11
45.8 (1)
220.8 (3|
SITE
510
512
514
614
634
J344
PROCESS
"OGD
rirnn
| 9Q1 1
905
925
935
906
936
946
SEGMENT
23
12
23
23
23
02
13
01
01
ACTIVITY LEVEL* (SEGMENT)
108.0 (2)
186.0 (2)
83.9 (2)
ACTIVE CONSTRAINTS: NONE
'OBJECTIVE VALUE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY LEVELS IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR v
-------
CHAPTER 5
OUTPUTS OF OPERATIONAL TEST
AMD EXERCISE PROGRAM RUNS
Tables XXI through XLII display the results of the 9 operational
test runs, the 13 exercise program runs, and the front-end-only CROW-
hLY mode 2 (maximum radius) run.
Inputs and other assumptions have been described in Chapter 3.
Summaries of process options offered and selected for each run have
been presented in Chapter 4, together with last phase of solution, the
number of rows, the number of columns, the solution values, and the
active constraints for each run.
Running time experience has been presented in Chapter 6 of the
User's Guide.
The presentation in this section includes all activity levels, the
objective values (total system cost) and the average costs per ton for
each solution.
The WRAP post processor was not operational for all of the runs.
Where it has been available, it has been used to provide the interpre-
tation of the solution. In three runs (N.E. Massachusetts A, A-2,
and A-3), the post processor was not available, and the solution was
interpreted by hand.
Table XXIII includes solutions for both St. Louis B and St. Louis
B-l because of the fact that those two runs generated identical activity
levels.
The District 118 mod (for which see the subsection Transportation
Data in Chapter 3) has been carried out for St. Louis A, A-l, B, B-l,
C, I, and F which were all of the runs affected by that problem. In
all cases, the solution is shown as generated and as modified.
For static runs, the objective values are in thousands of dollars
per year, including all costs from the time the packer trucks are loaded
(i.e., cost of haul to first offload point is included). Average costs
are on the same basis, and are in thousands of dollars per thousand tons,
or dollars per ton. ' For static runs, acitivity levels are in thousands
of tons per year.
For the dynamic run, the objective value is the total discounted
and inflated system cost over the whole planning period. The average
cost per ton is the objective value divided by total ton-years over the
planning period. Activity levels are in thousands of tons per year.
165
-------
Table XXI
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS A
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 4
Total Tonnage is 2493.9978
Objective Value:
Average Cost Per Ton:
As Computed
3026.1064
1.213356
District 118 Mod Increment
+97.87216
+ .03924
As Adjusted
3123.97856
1.25260
01
01
-------
St. Louis A
Table XXI
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL I>ATA FT* THf- S.IUi'X : TJ INT^McDI «TE fACILITV fl.lK.H->
*ACTIVITY LEVELS AR3 IN TH.1USAMOS JF TONS PCI riiH
ORIGIN NAME
DISTRICT I
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT 3
DISTRICT *
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 6
DISTRICT 7
DISTRICT 8
DISTRICT 9
DISTRICT 10
DISTRICT 11
DISTRICT 12
DISTRICT 1',
DISTRICT 14
DISTRICT 15
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT 17
DISTRICT IB
DISTRICT 19
DISTRICT 20
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT ii
DISTRICT 23
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 27
DISTRICT 28
DISTRICT 29
USS1
101
102
103
104
105
106
ior
101
103
IK-
111
112
113
114
115
114
117
119
119
120
121
121
123
123
12't
125
124
126
126
127
123
129
rtNArtns NAME'
11 T4ANS
Ml TKANS
M4 T°.AN5
IK. To TKANS PKOCSN,
M6 T4 TRANS P*f)C5'4'
MA Ti F34NS PR'ICSV-
17 T5 TRANS PRtlCINf
H7 Ti TRANS SMICS'JI,
12 TRANS
M7 Tb TifANS HincSN".
TRA\r P'i)Cc- . •
M3 TPANS
H? TRA,\I:
H7 T^ TttA\r> 1-^0' .'. ^."t
^« C? r^«Mi
M 5 fT T1? IN ct
"19 C2 T^A,,';
<<9 C? T;;A\r.
«9 C.' T^fMS
111 Cl TK/Hi
IIP T6 r; f!('
^)0f:
br^>
i07
•J57
^02
^C?
*>C7
31 1
5 '7
h '1 j
c.i', 'i
ti •*'?
5C" H
5C :•
•j'^
•!•>?
5.',->
511
5H
i? 1 1
S"''3
V?o
5'.5
5"^>
5C"
511
5->o
516
LEVEL"
District 118 mod; change 118 to 508 to zero; change 118 to 509 to 35.8.
-------
St. Louis A
Table XXI
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPQRTATIUM ACTIVITY UFVFL JAT4 FOR Trtt INTtHiri'IATr Til IVTilHf OIA,Tf FACILITY PAIRIS)
" »ACTI/ITY L£V=L5 ARE TM THOOW'ltn OF TuMS T< Yfci*
ORIGIN SITc NAME
f.CSTINATION SITt
ACTIVITY LEVEL-
en
oo
MI TRANS 501
«Z TRANS 50i
M3 TRANS 503
•1* TRANS 594
H5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
"6 T* TRANS PKOCSNG 506'
«6 T« TRANS PRUCSNG 506
H7 T5 TrtANS PRdCSIG 517
«7 T5 TRANS "ROCSN6 SOT
H9 T2 TRANS 508
M9 C2 TRANS 509
"10 T6 TRANS PKUCSNC 51P
«18 T6 TRANS PRQCSNS 510
Mil Cl TRAHS 511
TRANS
Ti»AiH01S!.
PUR TO VAN
P
-------
St. Louis A
Table XXI
Page 4 of 4
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS Of TONS PER YEAR
SITE M4N6
HI TRANS
«2 TRANS
«3 TRANS
N4 TRANS
N5 TRANS PROCSNG
M6 T* TRANS PROCSN&
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSN6
*8 TZ TtAMS
H9 CZ TRANS
H10 T6 TRANS PROCSNS
Tl TRANS
Ti TRANS
Ul NERA^EC MKT PROC
U2 LABADIE MXT PROC
MS SECOND PROC
N6 SECOND PROC
H7 SECOND PROC
N10 SECOND PRUC
Ul MERAHEC SECOND PR
U2 LABAOIE SECOND PR
AS WEST COUNTY
A9 HAL
P1UC ESS NAN£
501 TRANS PK< TO VAN
5O2 TKANS PKR TO VAN
501 TRANS PKS TO V.\"
504 THANS PKK TO VAN
505: SUBDUED PUEL PRUCES.
506 SrtREDOEO FUEL P«Or.SS
507 SHRE.OG?D FUEL PRIJCSS
SOB ' TRANS PK* TU V»N
5C9 TSAN5 PK1 TO VAN
510 SHRE3DED FUEL PKOCSf.
S12 T"
90?
903
9Ph
906
»Dft
906
906
907
907
ACTIVITY LINEAR
LCtf'L * SEGMENT
37.9000
86,9000
165.2000
4.500P
1055.9597
725.433P
49,7.0994
J911.BJ7I)-
51.5000
0.0
O.P
0.0
c.o
n.o
o.o
0.0
o.r.
0.0
0.0
0.0
i
2
3
1
3
2
2
'J
H
]
]
1
1. District 118 mod; change to 258.837
2. District 118 mod; change to 509-901-Segment 2 at 87.3
-------
Table XXII
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS A-l
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 4
As Calculated:
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
3501.9929 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS
FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 2493.9978 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 1.4042 PER TON
Objective Value
Average System Cost
District 118 Mod:
Mod Increment
+97.87216
+ .03924
Adjusted Values
3599.86506
1 .44341
-------
St. Louts A-l
Table XXII
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRCS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS Of TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT 10
DISTRICT 11
DISTRICT 12
DISTRICT 13
DISTRICT 14
DISTRICT 15
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT IT
DISTRICT IB
DISTRICT 19
DISTRICT 20
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT 22
DISTRICT 23
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 2T
DISTRICT 28
DISTRICT 29
I 0 DESTINATION NAME I D
101 Ml TRANS 501
102 Ml TRANS 501
103 M4 TRANS 504
104 M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
105 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
106 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
107 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
108 H7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
109 H2 TRANS 502
110 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
111 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
112 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
113 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
114 M3 TRANS 503
115 H3 TRANS 503
116 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
117 M9 C2 TRANS 509
US MS T2 TRANS 508
119 M9 C2 TRANS 509
120 M9 C2 TRANS 509
121 M9 C2 TRANS 509
122 M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
123 M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
124 M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
125 MS TRANS PROCSNG 505
126 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
126 M8 T2 TRANS 508
127 MB T2 TRANS 508
128 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
129 M6 T4 TRANS' PROCSNG 506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
5.9000
32.0000
4.5000
10.9000
53.3000
1.1000
14.9000
218.2OOO
66.9000
38.2OOO
13.7000
9.9000
103.5000
148.4000
16.8000
16.700O
2.3000.
35.8000'
1.1000
44.4000
3.7000
5B.1000
46.6000
147.0000
330.8999
185.8444
328.1538
67.0000
339.7998
128.4000
1. District 118 mode; 118-508 changed to 0; 118-509 changed to 35.8.
-------
St. Louis A-l
Table XXII
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DAT* FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAlRtSI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE I« THOUSANDS OF TOMS PW YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
HI TRANS 501
M2 TRANS 502
M3 TRANS 503
M4 TRANS 504
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
MS T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
«7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
M8 TZ TRANS 508
M9 CZ TRANS 509
M10 T6 TRANS PRDCSNS 510
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
Nil CI TRANS 511
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I 0
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
MS TRANS PROCSNG 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 504
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
MS TRANS PRQCSNG 505
M5 SECOND PROC 605
15 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M5 SECOND PROC 605
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 405
N5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
MS TRANS PROCSNG 505
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37.9000
86.9OOO
16S.2000
4.5000
0.0
0.0
97.7569
0.0
65.259V
430. 953* I
114.4677
39.0319
0.0
1. District 118 mod; change to 395.1534
2. District 118 mod; change to 87.3
TRANSPORTATION ACTIV1IY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIRISI
•ACTIVITY UfVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
H5 TRANS PROCSNG
I D ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I 0
WHERE APPLICABLE
505 SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 9O5
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
MS SECOND PROC 605
ACTIVITY
LEVEL •
161.2028
-------
St. Louis A-l
Table XXII
Page 4 of 4
SITE NAME
HI TRANS
H2 TRANS
H3 TRANS
M4 TRANS
M5 TRANS PROCSNG
N6 T* TRANS PROCSNG
NT T5 TRANS PROCSNG
MB T2 TRANS
M9 C2 TRANS
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG
Mil Cl TRANS
MS SECOND PROC
Mb SECOND PROC
M7 SECOND PROC
M10 SECOND PROC
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
I D PROCESS NAME I D
501 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
502 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
503 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
50* TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
5O5 SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
506 SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
507 SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
508 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
509 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
510 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
510 SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
511 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
605 SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
606 SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
607 SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
610 SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37.9000
86.900C
165.2000
4.5000
1240.0208
751.9749
501.9993
430.9534
51.5000
153.4996
0.0004
0.0
324.2197
0.0
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
1
2
3
1
3
2
2,
31
i2
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1. District 118 mod; change tp 395.1534
2. District 118 mod; change to 509-901-Segment 2 at 87.3
-------
Table XXIII
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS B AND ST. LOUIS B-l
(Phase 3 Solutions)
Page 1 of 5
TOTAL TONNAGE is 2493.9978 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
St. Louis B:
*
Objective Value in Thousands of Dollars Per Year
Average System Cost Per Ton
St. Louis B-l:
*
Objective Value in Thousands of Dollars Per Ton
Average System Cost Per Ton
As Calculated
3017.7942
1.210023
3909.8574
1.5677
District 118
Mod Increment
+97.87216
+ .03924
+97.87216
+ .03924
As Adjusted
3115.66636
1.249266
4007.72956
1.60695
Including all haul costs from the loading of packer trucks on.
-------
St. Louis B and B-l
Table XXIII
Page 2 of 5
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO ULTIMATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
DISTRICT II
I 0 DESTINATION NAME- I 13
111 A14 HRUWN MARISSA 703
ACTIVITY MODEL
LEVEL * PERIOD
12.1000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
6
7
8
9
10
11
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
"oistKicT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT I?.
DISTRICT 13
DISTRICT 14
"DISTRICT 15
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT 17
OISTKICT IS
DISTRICT 19
DISTRICT 20
"DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 2T
DISTRICT 28
DISTRICT 29
22
23
I D DESTINATION NAMS I 0
101 Ml TRANS 501
102 Ml TRANS 501
103 M^ TRANS 504
104 mo T6 TRAM; PROCSNG 510
105 M6 T4 TRANS PRllCSNG 506
104 «6 T4 THANS PROCSMC, 506
107 "O T5 TKAN5 PRLlCSNr, 507
108 M7 T5 TRANS PR1CSNG 507
109 12 TRANS 502
110 «7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
111 "17 Tb TK6NS PRUCSNG 507
112 M6 T4 TKANS PtUCSM'; 506
113 M7 T5 TRANS PRI1CSNS 507
11* M3 TRANS 503
115 M3 TRANS 503
116 M7 Tt TRAN5 PRUCSNG 507
117 M9 Cn TRANS 509
US MS T.'. TRANS 503
119 M9 I? TRANS 509
120 M9 C2 TRANS 50V
121 M9 C2 TRANS 509
121 Mil Cl TRANS 511
122 M10 T6 TRANS PRUCSNG 510
123 M10 T6 TRANS PRDCSNG 510
124 M5 TRANS PKIiCSNG 505
125 M5 TRANS PRDCSNG 505
126 M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
126 M6 T4 TRANS PRHCSNG 50o
126 MS T2 TRANS 503
127 MIO T6 TRANS PROCSNO 510
128 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
129 Hh T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
5.9000
32.0000
4.5000
10.9000
53.3000
1.1CUb
14.9000
218.2000
36.9000
38.2000
1.60CO
9.900r
103.5000
148.4000
16.8000
16.7000
2.3000
35.800C1
1.100P
44.4000
3.7000
0.0
56.1000
46.6000
147.COOO
330.3999
67.37E7
138.4393
258.1816
67.0000
339.7998
128.4000
1. District 118 mod; change 118-508 to 0; change 118-509 to 35.8.
-------
St. Louis B and B-l
Table XXIII
Page 3 of 5
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DAT* FOR THS INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I 0
Ml TRANS 501
MZ TRANS 502
M3 TRANS 503
H4 TRANS 504
MS TRANS PROCSNG SOS
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 5O7
*7 TS TRANS PROCSNG 507
MB T2 TRANS 508
N9 C2 TRANS 909
«IO TS TRANS PROCSNG 510
N10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG S10
Mil Cl TRANS 511
Ul WERAMEC HKT PROC S14
Ul MERANEC MKT PROC 514
UZ LABADIE MKT PROC SIS
ORlr.IN PROCESS NAME I 0
TRANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS PKR m VAN
TRANS PIU TO VAN
TRANS PKR TCI VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
SHREDDED RJF.L PRUCSS
TRANS PKR TO VAN
SHREDDED FUtL PHOCSS
TRANS PKR TU VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
SrtRFmjED FlKl fROCSS
1RANS PKk TO V4N
SHREDDFD FUFL p^otss
SHR6OD6D FUEL PHOCSS
SHRE!>DfcD FUEL PKOCSS
OESTIKATION SITS NAMS I O
901
901
901
901
901
9C1
905
901
90S
901
901
901
905
901
905
905
90S
M10 T6 TRANS PHOCSW;
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNt;
MS TRANS PROCSNG
Mf, T4 TRANS PROCSNG
N6 T4 TRAMS PROCSNJ
MS TRANS PROCSNG
MS SECOND PROC
MS TRANS PROCSNG
MS SECOND PHOC
MS TRANS PROCSNG
MS TRANS PROCSNG
MS TRANS PROCSNS
MS SECOND PROC
H6 T4 TRANS PSOCSNG
Ho SECUND PROC
M10 SECOND PROC
(UO SECOND PROC
S10
SC7
SOS
S06
50(b
505
6Oi
51-5
605
SOS
SOS
SOS
6CS
5O6
606
610
61O
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37.90OO
86,9000
163.2000
4.5000
0.0
0.0
94.3071
o.c
62.3999
293.
51.
C.C
28.be. SO
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Z.3999
J .98121
l.SOOO2
1. District H8 mod; change to 258.1812
2. District 118 mod; change to 87.3
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO ULTIMATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARS IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS TOR YEAR
.081SJN SITE HUME I 0
~U2 LABADIE «KT W«OC 515
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I l>
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 90S
DESTINATION SITE NANF. I D
A2 FRANKLIN COUNTY 702
ACTIVITY
LEWtL »
0.0
-------
St. Louis B and B-l
Table XXIII
Page 4 of 5
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LCVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR|S»
•ACTWTr LEVELS AR£ IN THOUSANDS OP TONS PIS. YEAR .
ORIGIN SITE NAME I 0
Ml TRANS 501
«1 TRANS 501
M3 TRANS 503
M* TRANS SO*
*5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
MS TRANS PHOCSNG 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
*T T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
MP T2 TRANS 50S
M9 C2 TRANS 50"!
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
Mil Cl TRANS 511
Tl TRANS 512
T3 TRANS 51.1
Ul MfRAMEC NKT PROC 51*
U2 LABADtE »KT PROC 515
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME
APPLICABLE
THANS PKR VN TJ RtIL
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
THANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR VN TO ^AIL
SHRE3DED PUFL PRUCSS
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR VN TO RAH.
TRANS PKR V\ TO RAIL
TRANS PKR TO CNTNR
TR»NS PKR VN TJ KAIL
TRANS PKR TO CNTNR
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR V.V TO RAIL
SHREOOED FUSL PRUCSS
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS
I D
DESTINATION SIT6 NAME I
903
903
903
903
903
9C5
903
903
903
902
903
9C2
903
703
905
905
Ul
U2
U2
U2
112
15
IU
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
Ul
U2
MESAMEC
LASADIE
LAUADIE
LABADIE
LASAD1E
SECOND
LABADIE
LABADLE
LABAOIE
LABAOIE
LABADIE
LASADIE
LASADIE
LAJJAJ.IE
MERAMEC
LABAOIc
MKT PROG
MKT PROC
HKT PROC
HKT PKUC
MKT PRUC
PROC
MKT PRUC
MSI JSUC..
MKT PROC
MKT PROC
MKT PROC
MKT PROC
MKT PROC
«K.T PBQC_
SECOND PR
SECOND PR
514
5.L5
515
515
515
605
515
. SIS-
SIS
515
515
515
515
—5.15-
61*
(.15
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.C
0.0
137.^748
O.C
. JMl—.
0.0
0.0
O.C
0.0
0.0
. _. i^> ....
O.b
0.0
-------
St. Louis B and B-1
Table XXIII
Page 5 of 5
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS AR= TN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I 0
HI TRANS 501
M2 TRANS 502
H3 TRANS 503
*4 TRANS 50*
K5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M6 T* TRANS PROCSNG 506
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
MB T2 TRANS 509
H9 C2 TRANS SCI
mO T6 TRANS PROCSHG 510
Tl TRANS 512
T3 TRANS 513
Ul H?i«AHEC »=USL PRUCSS 9f5
SMAEDD6D FUSL PROC5T, 90S
SHREDDED FUEL PR3CSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDcD FII6L PSUCST W5
TRANS PKK VN TO RAIL 903
THANS PKR VN TO HAIL 903
SUKtODfD Fi.'EL PROCSS 905
SECONDARY RECOVERY 90h
SECONDARY KECOVSKY 906
SaNITAKY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LJNOFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SAMTASY LANOFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 9P7
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37,
86,
165
4
1055
725,
479,
293,
51,
220
0,
0
0
322
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
9000
9000
,20OO
500C
9597
4385
9995
9912,
-5000
LINEAR
SEGMENT
1
2
3
I
3
£
2
3
1
,0
.0
,0
,6465
,0
,c
,0
,0
,0
,0
,0
,1COO
,0
,0
,0
,0
.o
1. District 118 rood; change to 258.1812.
2. District 118 mod; change to 509-901-Segment 2 at 87.3
-------
Table XXIV
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS C
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 4
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
As Calculated:
4463.9688 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS
FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 2493.9978 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 1.7899 PER TON
Mod Increment
District 118 Hod:
Adjusted Values
Objective Value
Average System Cost
+122.700874
+ .049198
4586.66967
1.839083
-------
St. Louis C
Table XXIV
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL OAT* FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT 12
DISTRICT 13
DISTRICT 1*
DISTRICT 15
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT IT
DISTRICT IP
DISTRICT 19
DISTRICT 20
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT 22
DISTRICT 23
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 27
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 29
I "> DESTINATION NAME I t)
101 HI TRANS 501
102 Ml TRANS 501
103 M4 TRANS 50*
104 MIO T6 TRANS PROCSNG 518
106 H6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
lOb MS TZ TRANS 50S
107 M7 PROCESSING 507
109 17 PROCESSING 507
109 M2 TRANS 502
110 17 PROCESSING 507
111 M7 PROCESSING 507
112 17 PROCESSING 507
113 17 PROCESSING 507
114 13 TRANS 503
115 13 TRANS 503
116 «7 PROCESSING 507
117 "9 C2 TRANS 50V
119 18 T2 TRANS 508
119 MIO T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
120 19 C2 TRANS 509
121 19 C2 TRANS 509
121 Mil Cl TRANS 511
122 MIO T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
123 110 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
124 15 TRANS PROCSNG 505
125 M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
126 MS TRANS PROCSNG 505
126 MS T2 TRANS 508
127 110 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
123 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
129 MB TZ TRANS 50R
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
5.9000
32.0000
4.50CC
10.900O
53.3000
1.1000
14.9000
218.2000
86.9000
38.2000
13.7000
9.9000
103.5000
140.4000
16.0000
16.7000
2.3000
35.80001
1.1000
44.4000
3.7OOO
0.0000
SB.1000
46.6000
147.0000
330.8999
101.6457
412.3542
67.OOOO
339.7998
128.4000
1. District 118 mod; change 118-508 to 0; change 118-509 to 35.8
-------
St. Louis C
Table XXIV
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTFRMEDIATF FACILITY P*IR(SI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEA*
ORIGIN SITE NAME
Ml TRANS 501
m TRANS 502
H3 TRANS iOJ
M4 TRANS 504
H5 TRANS PROCSSG SOS
MS TRANS PPOCSNG 505
M4 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
MB T2 TRANS 50e
M9 C2 TRANS 539
M9 C2 TRANS 509
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 51C
M10 T6 TRANS PRC1CSNG 510
Mil Cl TRANS 511
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKK TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PRflCSS 90S
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TU VAN 901
TRANS PKR. TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
M7 PROCESSING 507
M7 PROCESSING 507
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNS 506
M6 V- TRANS PROCSNG 506
M6 SECOND PROC 606
MIO T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
M6 T4 TKANS PROCSNG 506
MB T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
MM T6 TRANS HRC1CSNG 510
MS TRANS P«UCSNG 505
«6 SECOND PRUC 606
M6 T't TRANS PROCSNG 506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
37.9000
86.9000
165.2000
4.5000
579.5*54
0.0
0.0 ,
5T7.65381
18.8521^
31.5478
0.0
32.9092
O.O
1. District 118 mod; change to 541.8538
2. District 118 mod; change to 54.6521
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
N6 T4 TRANS PRUCSNG 506
M7 PROCESSING 5P7
H10 16 TKANS PROCSNG 510
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I O
NHERF APPLICABLE
SHRF.DDSD FUEL PROCSS 905
SHKKDDED FUEL PKOCSS 905
SHREDDSD FUEL PROCSS 90i
SHREDDED FUtL PROCSS 905
DESTINATION SITE NAME I l>
M5 SECOND PROC
M6 SECOND PHUC
M7 SECOND PROC
M10 SECOND PROC
605
606
607
610
ACTIVITY
LEVEL •
O.O
204.5746
86.7359
0.0
-------
St. Louis C
Table XXIV
Page 4 of 4
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TOMS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501
M2 TRANS 502
M3 TRANS 503
H4 TRANS 504
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSSS 506
MT PROCESSING 507
M8 T2 TRANS 508
M9 C2 TRANS 509
M1O T6 TRANS PRDCSNG 510
M6 SECOND PROC 606
M7 SECOND PROC 607
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANS PKR TU VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR £O VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
SECONDARY RECOVERY 90a
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37.9000
B6.90OO
165.2000
4.5000
579.5*54
1573.6514
667.1995,
577.65391
50.3999''
253.1474
237.4839
86.7359
LINEAR
SEGMENT
1
2
3
1
3
3
2
3
1
2
2
1
1. District ITS mod; change to 541.8538
2. District 118 mod; change to 509-901-Segment 2 at 86.1999
-------
Table XXV
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS E
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 4
As Calculated:
00
OJ
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
3606.7139 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS
FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 2113.0981 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 1.7068 PER TON
Objective Value
Average System Cost
District 118 Mod:
Mod Increment
+96.39576
+ .038651
Adjusted Values
3703.10966
1.752455
-------
St. Louis E
Table XXV
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURC? TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT 10
DISTRICT 11
DISTRICT 12
DISTRICT 13
DISTRICT I*
DISTRICT 15
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT 17
DISTRICT 18
DISTRICT It
DISTRICT 20
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT 22
DISTRICT 23
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 27
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 29
I D DESTINATION NAME I 0
101 Ml TRANS 501
102 Ml TRANS 501
103 *4 TRANS 504
104 M10 T6 TRANS PROCSN5 510
105 M6 14 TRANS PROCSNG 506
106 *6 T4 TRANS PROCSMG 506
107 H7 T5 TRANS PROCSMG 507
106 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
109 M2 TRANS 502
110 K7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
111 .M7 T5 TRANS PROCSMG 5C7
112 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
113 M7 TS TRANS PROCSNG 5C7
114 M3 TRANS 503
115 13 TRANS 503
116 Ifl T5 TRANS PROCSNb 507
117 H9 C2 TRANS 509
118 Ma T2 TRANS 503
119 M9 C2 TRANS 5P9
120 H9 C2 TRANS 509
121 «•» C2 TRANS 5C9
122 MIO T6 TRANS CSOCSNS 510
123 MIT T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
124 M5 TRANS PROCSNG SOS
125 MS TRANS PROCSNG 505
126 M8 T2 TRANS 508
127 MB T2 TRANS 50t
128 M6 T4 TRANS PRCKSNS 506
129 M8 T2 TRANS 508
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
5.1000
29.900CI
4.3000
10.3000
43.5000
1.0000
14.1000
205.0000
74.9000
2^.3000
12.9000
8.7000
"52.0COO
115.3000
is.ooor
14.SOGO
2.100C
33.3000'
1.0000
39.8000
3.5000
46.6000
38.4000
122.5000
282.0999
405.5000
52.2000
282.3999
109.2000
1. District 118 mod; change 118-508 to 0; change 118-509 to 33.8
-------
St. Louis E
Table XXV
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAH
ORIGIN SITE NAME
Ml TRANS 501
«2 TRAMS 502
M3 TRANS 503
M3 TRANS 503
•H TRANS 504
M5 TRANS PKOCSNG 505
M6 TA TRANS PROCSNG 506
M6 TA TRANS PROCSNG 506
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 5*07
MB T2 TRANS SOB
»9 C2 TRANS 509
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
HIO T6 TRANS PROCSNS 510
Mil Cl TRANS 511
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I U
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREODE3 FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKO TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREMED FUEL PROCSE 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I 0
M10 TO TRANS PRDCSNG 510
M7 TS TRANS PRDCSNG 507
*5 T*ANS PROCSNK 505
«7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
*6 T(5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
15 TRANS PROCSNi 505
«5 SECOND PROC 605
MS TRANS P«OCSNS 505
ACTIVITY
LEVEL «
34.0000
74.9000
39.0530
4.3000
C.C
336.1997
O.OOOO
0.0
62.97SB,
600.6995,
46.4POO*
0.0
16.8350
0.0
1. District 118 mod; change to 566.8995
2. District 118 mod; change to 80.2
TRANSPORTATION 4ITIVIT* LEVEL nATl FIR T.It CATEGORY FIVE PAIRIS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PSR YEA*
ORIGIN SITE NAME
M5 TRANS PROCSNG
ORIGIN PRHCESS NAME
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
M5 SECOMO PROC 605
ACTIVITY
LcVfcL *
-------
St. Louis E
Table XXV
Page 4 of 4
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I 0
Ml TRANS 501
H2 TRANS 502
H3 TRANS 503
M* TRANS 504
MS TRANS PROCSN6 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
M8 T2 TRANS 501
M9 C2 TRANS 509
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
Mil Cl TRANS 511
MS SECOND PROC 605
MS SECOND PROC 606
MT SECOND PROC &07
HIO SECOND PROC 610
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKK TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
34.000C
74.9000
150.3000
4.3000
1499.1460
336.1997
484.4524
600.6995
46.4000
129.5000
0.0
274.7026
0.0
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
1
2
3
1
3
3
2,
3;
i2
i
i
2
I
1
1
1. District 118 mod; change to 566.8995
2. District 118 mod; change to 509-901-Segment 2 at 80.2
-------
Table XXVI
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS F
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 4
As Calculated:
CO
-J
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
4728.8672 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS
FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 2493.9978 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 1.8961 PER TON
Objective Value
Average System Cost
District 118 Mod:
Mod Increment
+137.07772
+ .054963
Adjusted Values
4865.94492
1.951062
-------
St. Louis F
Table XXVI
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DAT* FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR IS I
*ACTIVITY LEVtLS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
CO
CO
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT 10
DISTRICT 11
DISTRICT 12
DISTRICT 13
DISTRICT I*
DISTRICT 15
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT 17
DISTRICT 16
DISTRICT 19
DISTRICT 20
DISTRICT 21
DISTRICT 22
DISTRICT 23
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 27
DISTRICT 28
DISTRICT 29
I D DESTINATION NAME 1 D
101 Ml TRANS 501
102 Ml TRANS 501
103 U2 LABADtf MKT PROC 515
104 M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNS 510
IPS M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
106 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNr, 506
107 *T T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
10» M7 T5 TRANS PROCSN1 507
169 M2 TSAN5 502
110 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNC 507
111 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNC, 507
112 M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
113 MS TRANS PROCSNG 505
114 M3 TRANS 503
115 « TRANS 503
116 H7 T5 TRAMS PROCSNG 507
117 112 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
113 18 T2 TRANS 506
119 U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
120 Tl TRANS 512
121 Tl TRANS 512
122 U2 LA6AOIE MKT PROC 515
123 MIC T4 TRANS PROCSNG 510
124 Tl TRANS 512
125 . MS TRANS PRQCSN6 505
126 MS T2 TRANS SOB
127 Tl TRANS 512
128 H6 T4 TRANS PROCSHG SOi
129 *a T2 TRANS 508
ACTIVITY
LEVEL «
5.9000
32.00OO
4.5000
10.9000
53.3000
1.1000
14.900C
218.2000
36.900C
38.2000
13.7000
9.90OO
103.5000
148.4000
lo.BOOO
16.7000
2.3000,
35.6000
1.1000
44.4000
3.7000
58.1000
44.6000
14T.OOOO
330.8999
514.0000
67.00OO
339.7998
128.4000
1. District 118 mod; change 118-508 to 0; change 118-509 to 35.8
-------
St. Louis F
Table XXVI
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LSVSL DATA FDR TnF INTERMEDIATE T3 INTERMEOIATF FACILITY PAIRtSI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ART IN T13USANOS OF TUNS PtK YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAMi
I !>
ORISIN PROCESS NAiMf I 0
MI TRANS
M2 TRANS
H3 TRANi
«n TRANS
*<• THANS
M5 TRANS PROCSNS
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG
rtT T5 TRANS PRUCSM,
MS T2 TRANS
«9 C2 TRAKS
•no T* TRANS PKOCSNG
Mil Cl TRANS
501
505
502
503
504
535
50 !>
507
503
509
51 C
511
TRANS PKR Tf) VAN
T^ANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
TKANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS PKR TO VAN
TRANS P£>
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY l^VEL DATA COS Trie CATEGOHY !=IV? PAIR(Sl
*ACTTVITY LEVELS AKS IN THOUSANDS OF TOMS Ft* YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
MI TRANS 501
WJ TRANS 503
H4 TRANS 504
m TRANS PROCSNG 505
MA T4 TRANS PROCSNu 50f>
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
M8 T2 TRANS 506
M9 C2 TRANS 509
RIO Tfc TRANS PROCSNG 510
Mil Cl TRANS 511
Tl TRANS 512
T3 TRANS 513
Ul HERAMKC MKT PROC 51*
U2 LA8ADIE MKT PRfJC Sib
ORIGIN PROCESS NAMF
WHERE APPLICABLEi
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKK VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKft VN TO RAIL
TRA.N5 PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKt VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR VN TO SAIL
TRANS PKR TO CMTNU
TRANS PKA VN TO RAIL
TRANS PKR TO CNTNK
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL
TRANS P«.R Vf« TH RAIL
SHRSD!>'i> FUEL PROCSS
SHREOOEU fUEL PROC5:
OESTINATI11N SITE NAME t 0
903
903
903
903
903
9fl?
903
902
903
90?
903
903
905
905
o:
02
(12
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
Ot
01
U2
LAH40IE
LAI1AOI?
LA6AD15
LABADIE
LABADIS
LABADJE
LABAJIt
LABADIE
LAOADIE
LABADI3
LABADI"
LABADi;
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
PROC
P*DC
PROC
PROC
PROC
PKOC
PROC
PROC
PRDC
PROC
PROC
PROC
Mt.RAMtC. SECOND PR
LAUfcuI-
SECOND PR
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
614
615
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
C.O
165.2000
0.0
434.3999
404.0996
3B8.5996,
678.1997^
D.C
0.0
0.0
262.0999
0.0
0.0
324.2190-
2. District 118 mod; change to 642.3997
-------
St. Louis F
Table XXVI
Page 4 of 4
to
o
SITE NAME
Hi TRANS
N2 TRANS
NT'TRANS
•«4 TRANS
N5 TRANS PROCSNG
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG
M7 TS TRANS PROCSNG
, N8 T2 TRANS
HI C2 TRANS
M10 TS TRtNS PROCSNG
Nil Cl TRANS
Tl TRANS
T3 TRANS
Ul MERAMEC HKT PROC
U2 LABADIE MKT PROC
N6 SECOND PROC
Kin SECOND PROC
V2 LABADIE SECOND PR
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE I* THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
I D PROCESS NAME I D
501 TRANS PKR TO V4N 901
502 TRANS PKH TO VAN 901
503 TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
50* TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
505 TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
506 TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
507" TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
508 TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
509 TRANS PKR To CNTNR 90i
510 TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
511 TRANS PKR TO CNTNR 902
512 TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
513 TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
514 SHREOOfD FUEL PROCSS 905
515 SHRE.iDen FUEL P*OCSr. 905
606 SECONDARY RECOVERY 90o
610 S?COUOARr RECOVERY 906
615 SSCONDARY RECOVERY 906
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37.9000
86.90OO
165.2000
0.0
434.3999
404.0996
3J8.5996
678.1997
0.0
57.5000
0.0
262.0999
0.0
0.0
.1493.9985
0.0
0.0
3?4.2190
LINEAR
SEGMENT
1
2
3
I
3
3
3
\2
2
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1. District 118 mod; change to 642.3997
2. District 118 mod; change to 35.8
-------
TABLE XXVII
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS F-1 (Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 3
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS ?955.CHB1 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE TS 2*93.9978 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 1.5858 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR2
DISTRICT 23
DISTRICT 24
DISTRICT 25
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT 27
DISTRICT 26
DISTRICT ?9
10
11
12
17
19
I D DESTINATION NAME I D
101 Ml TRANS 501
102 Ml TRANS 501
103 U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
104 M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
105 Ul HFRAMEC MKT PROC 514
10ft Ul MERAMEC MKT PRDC 514
107 Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC 514
108 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
109 M2 TRANS 502
110 M7 T5 TRANS PRDCSNG 507
111 M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
112 rf* T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
113 MS TRANS PfiOCSNG 505
114 M3 TRANS 503
113 M3 TRANS 503
116 M7 T5 TRANi PROCSNG 507
117 U2 LABADIE MKT PRIJC 515
118 M9 C2 TRANS 509
119 M9 C2 TRANS 509
120 Tl TRANS 512
121 Tl TRANS 512
122 U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
123 MIC T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
124 Tl TRANS . 512
125 M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
126 MB T2 TRANS 508
127 Tl TRANS 512
128 M6 T4 TRAMS PROCSNG 506
129 MS T2 TRANS 508
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
5.9000
32.0000
4.5000
10.9000
53.3000
1.1000
14.9000
218.2000
86.9000
36.2000
13.7000
9.9000
103.5000
148.4000
16.8000
16.7000
2.3000
35.8000
1.1000
44.4000
3.7000
58.1000
46.6000
147.0000
330.8999
514.0000
67.0000
339.7998
128.4000
-------
St. Louis F-l
Table XXVII
Page 2 of 3
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRtSJ
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TDNS PER YEAR
U3
ro
ORIGIN SITE NAME
Ml TRANS
H2 TRANS
M3 TRANS
M4 TRANS
MS TRANS PROCSNG
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG
MB T2 TRANS
H8 T2 TR/.NS
M9 C2 TRANS
M10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG
M1J Cl TRANS
U2 LABADIF MK.T PROC
I 0
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
508
509
510
511
515
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
SHREDDED
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
FUEL
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
PROCSS
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
905
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
U2 LABADie HKT PROC 515
Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC 514
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
111 MERAMEC MKT PROC 51*
Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC 514
Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC 514
ui MERAMEC MKT PROC 514
U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC 514
M10 SECOND PRQC 610
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
M3 THAN!
M4 TP.ANS
H5 TKANS t>ROCSNG
M6 T4 TR^NS PROCSNG
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG
MS T2 TRANS
M9 C2 TRANS
N10 T6 TRANS PROCSNG
Mil (.1 TRANS
Tl TRANS
T3 TRANS
Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC
U2 LABAD:E MKT PRDC
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME
WHERE APPLICABLE
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
503
504
50 i
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TKANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
SHREDDED
SHREDDED
VN
VN
VN
VN
VN
VN
TO
VN
TO
VN
VN
FUEL
FUEL
TO RAIL
TO RAIL
TO RAIL
TO RAIL
TO RAIL
TO RAIL
CNTNR
TO RAIL
CNTNR
TO RAIL
TO RAIL
PROCSS
PRUCSS
903
903
903
903
903
903
902
903
902
903
903
905
905
U2
U2
U2
U2
UZ
U2
U2
U2
U2
UZ
U2
Ul
U2
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
LABADIE
MERAMEC
LABADIE
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
MKT
PROC
PROC
PROC
PROC
PROC
PRDC
PROC
PROC
PROC
PROC
PROC
SECOND PR
SECOND PR
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
515
614
615
ACTIVITY
LEVEL «
37.9000
86.90OO
0.0
0.0
434.3999
349.6997
286.7988
39.9006
602.4990
36.9000
57.5000
0.0
0.0001
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
165.2000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
262.0999
0.0
164.7100
159.5O93
-------
St. Louis F-l
Table XXVII
Page 3 of 3
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
*ACTIV1TY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I 0
Ml TRANS 501
M2 TRANS 502
M3 TRANS 503
M4 TRANS 50*
M5 TRANS PROCSNG 505
M6 T4 TRANS PROCSNG 506
M7 T5 TRANS PROCSNG 507
M8 T2 TRANS 508
M9 C2 TRAMS 509
Mil) T6 TRANS PROCSNG 510
Mil Cl TRANS 511
Tl TRANS 512
T3 TRANS 513
Ul MERAMEC MKT PROC 51*
U2 LABADIE MKT PROC 515
Ul MERAMEC SECOND PR 614
U2 LABADIE SECOND PR 615
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR TO VAN 901
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
TRANS PKR VN TO RAIL 903
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
SHREDDED FUEL PROCSS 905
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
37.9000
86.9000
165.2000
0.0
434.3999
349.6997
286.7986
642.3999
36.9000
57.5000
0.0
262.0999
0.0
1266.9993
1226.9983
164.7100
159.5093
LINEAR
SEGMENT
1
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
i
2
1
3
1
3
3
2
2
-------
Table XXVIII
OUTPUTS FOR ST. LOUIS G (Dynamic)
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 13
Tonnage Summary
Period
1
2
3
4
Total
No. of Years
3
10
7
5
25
Tons Per Year (thousands)
2466.3992
3052.4976
4273.1939
5360.2904
—
Ton-Years
7399.1976
30524.9760
29912.3573
26801.4520
94637.9829
Discounted Average Cost Per Ton = -1.890778
-------
St. Louis G Table XXVIII Page 2 of 13
DYNAMIC MODEL OUTPUT
MODEL PERIOD MAJOR SORT
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS -178939.3750 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS DISCOUNTED TO YEAR ONE INCLUDING ALL
COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
ACTIVITY DATA FDR MODEL PERIOD 1
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO ULTIMATE FACILITY PAIRISI
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
MADISON COUNTY
I D DESTINATION NAME I D
103 A19 VI6US OUARRY 711
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
ID
Ol
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 1
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR1SI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
FRANKLIN COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
HONROE COUNTY
ST. CHARLES COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
ST. LOUIS CITY
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
I D DESTINATION NAME I D
101 HI TRANS 501
102 Mb PROCESSING 506
102 H10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
102 Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
103 H6 PROCESSING 506
103 MT TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
104 MJ, PROCESSING 506
105 M6 PROCESSING 506
106 M6 PROCESSING 506
107 M6 PROCESSING 506
108 M6 PROCESSING 506
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 1
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
39.100O
65.5000
0.0
0.0
280.0999
0.0
10.2000
79.3000
358.2000
795.2996
838.7000
MODEL
PERIOD
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRtS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
Ml TRANS 501
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
H9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TD VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I 0
M6 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
«6 PROCESSING
50s
506
506
506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
39.1000
0.0
0.0
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
1
1
1
1
-------
St. Louis G
Table XXVIII
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 1
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAR
Page 3 of 13
SITE NAME I D
HI TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PVROLYSIS 507
H9 TRANS 509
BIO TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
A19 VIGUS QUARRY Til
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SANITARY LANDFILL 9O7
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
39.1000
2466.3992
Q.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
VO
cn
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 1
CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS Of TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501
N6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 5O7
M9 TRANS 509
H10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
A19 VIGUS QUARRY 711
MODEL
PROCESS NAME I D PERIOD
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 1
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955 1
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 1
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 1
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 1
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955 1
SANITARY LANDFILL 907 1
ACTIVITY LINEAR
LEVEL * SEGMENT
75.9000
2466.3992
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ACTIVITY DATA FOR HODEL PERIOD I
CAPACITY UNDERUTILIZATION ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I D PROCESS NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501 TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
MODEL
PERIOD
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
36.8000
-------
St. Louis G Table XXVIII
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIH(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
Page 4 of 13
ORIGIN NAME I D
FRANKLIN COUNTY 101
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
MADISON COUNTY 103
MONROE COUNTY 10*
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106
ST. LOUIS CITY 107
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 108
DESTINATION NAME I 0
Ml TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M? TRANS 509
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M6 PROCESSING 506
H6 PROCESSING 506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
50.8000
90.6000
0.0
0.0
361.6995
14.3000
114.6000
449.0999
895.5999
1075.2996
MODEL
PERIOD
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 2
ID
--J
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
I D
HI TRANS 501
M7 TRANS/PYRDLYSIS 507
M9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I U
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I 0
M6 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
506
506
506
506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
50.8000
0.0
114.6000
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
2
2
2
2
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 2
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501
«6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
A19 VIGUS OUARRY 711
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
ACTIVITY MODEL
LEVEL * PERIOD
50.8000
2226.8987
0.0
825.5989
114.6000
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
-------
St. Louis G Table XXVIII Page 5 of 13
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 2
CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITY LEVELS
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
MODEL ACTIVITY LINEAR
SITE NAME I D PROCESS NAME I D PERIOD LEVEL * SEGMENT
«6 PROCESSING 506 GAS PYROLYSIS 935 2 2226.8987 1
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507 GAS PYROLYSIS 935 2 825.5989 1
H9 TRANS 509 TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 2 271.0000 3
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510 GAS PYROLYSIS 935 2 0.0 1
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 2
CAPACITY UNDERUTILIZATION ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
MODEL ACTIVITY
SITE NAME I D PROCESS NAME I D PERIOD LEVEL *
Ml TRANS 501 TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 2 25.1000
M6 PROCESSING 506 SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955 2 2466.3992
M9 TRANS 509 TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 2 156.4000
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 3
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO ULTIMATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY MODEL
ORIGIN NAME I D DESTINATION NAME I D LEVEL * PERIOD
MADISON COUNTY 103 AI9 VIGUS QUARRY 711 0.0 3
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 3
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY MODEL
ORIGIN NAHE I D DESTINATION NAME I 0 LEVEL * PERIOD
FRANKLIN COUNTY 1O1 Ml TRANS 501 75.9000 3
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102 M6 PROCESSING 506 148.5000 3
MADISON COUNTY 103 N6 PROCESSING 506 350.2996 3
MADISON COUNTY 103 M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507 189.4999 3
MONROE COUNTY 104 M6 PROCESSING 506 25.1000 3
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105 M9 TRANS 509 195.3000 3
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106 M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507 636.0994 3
ST. LOUIS CITY 107 M6 PROCESSING 506 1070.2996 3
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 1O8 M6 PROCESSING 506 1582.2000 3
-------
St. Louis G
Table XXVIII
Page 6 of 13
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 3
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME i o
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
16 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
M6 PROCESSING
H6 PROCESSING
506
506
506
506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
75.9000
0.0
195.3000
0.0
MODtL
PERIOD
3
3
3
3
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 3
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME
I D
PROCESS NAME
I 0
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
MODEL
PERIOD
VO
VO
Ml TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
H9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSIN6 514
A19 VIGUS QUARRY 711
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
75.9000
3447.5950
825.5989
195.3000
0.0
0.0
0.0
ACTIVITY OATA FOR NODEL PERIOD 3
CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITJf LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME
M6 PROCESSING
A19 VIGUS QUARRY
506
711
PROCESS NAME I D
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
MODEL
PERIOD
SITE NAME
M& PROCESSING
M9 TRANS
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 3
CAPACITY UNDERUTILIZATION ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
MODEL
I D PROCESS NAME I D PERIOD
506
509
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955 3
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 3
ACTIVITY LINEAR
LEVEL * SEGMENT
1220.6963
0.0
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
2466.3992
75.7000
-------
St. Louis G Table XXVIII Page 7 of 13
ACTIVITY OAT* FOR MODEL PERIOD 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FDR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAHE I D
FRANKLIN COUNTY 101
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
MADISON COUNTY 103
MONROE COUNTY 104
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106
ST. LOUIS CITY 107
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 108
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 106
DESTINATION NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501
H6 PROCESSING 506
H7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS S07
M6 PROCESSING 506
H9 TRANS 509
M7 TRANS/PYRQLYSIS 507
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
98.8000
202.4000
702.2996
34.8000
271.0000
803.3997
1205.3997
2005.0020
37.1976
MODEL
PERIOD
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
ro
O
O
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRtS)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
Ml TRANS 501
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
M6 PROCESSING 506
HIO TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
H6 PROCESSING 506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
98.8000
0.0
271.0000
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
4
4
4
4
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 4
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAHE I D
HI TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
A19 VIGUS OUARRY 711
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYRQLYSIS 935
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
SAS PYRDLYSIS 935
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
9B.8000
3447.5874
1505.6995
271.0000
406.9971
0.0
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
-------
St. Louis G
Table XXVIII
Page 8 of 13
ACTIVITY DATA FOR MODEL PERIOD 4
CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I 0
HI TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 50i
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
H7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
MODEL
PERIOD
4
4
4
4
4
ACTIVITY LINEAR
LEVEL * SEGMENT
98.6000
0.0
0.0
680.O994
0.0
406.9971
0.0
ro
O
LAND CONSTRAINT ACTIVITY LEVELS OF SLACKS IN ACRE-FEET
SITE
711
ACTIVITY LEVEL
20000.0000
-------
St. Louis 6 Table XXVIII Page 9 of 13
DYNAMIC MODEL OUTPUT
MODEL PERIOD INNER SORT
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS -178939.3750 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS DISCOUNTED TO YEAR ONE INCLUDING ALL
COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO ULTIMATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY MODEL
ORIGIN NAME I 0 DESTINATION NAME I 0 LEVEL * PERIOD
MADISON COUNTY IO3 A19 VICUS QUARRY 711 0.0 1
MADISON COUNTY 103 A19 VICUS OUARRY Til 0.0 3
-------
St. Louis G
Table XXVIII
Page 10 of 13
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS!
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
tvj
O
U>
ORIGIN NAME I 0
FRANKLIN COUNTY 101
FRANKLIN COUNTY 101
FRANKLIN COUNTY 101
FRANKLIN COUNTY 101
JEFFERSON COUNTY 103
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JEFFERSON COUNTY 103
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JEFFERSON COUNTY 102
JFFFERSON COUNTY 102
NAOISON COUNTY 103
MAO!SON COUNTY 103
MAO I SON COUNTY 103
MAO!SON COUNTY 103
MAOISON COUNTY 103
MADISON COUNTY 103
MONROE COUNTY 104
MONROE COUNTY 10*
MONROE COUNTY 104
MONROE COUNTY 10*
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105
ST. CHARLES COUNTY 105
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106
ST. CLAIR COUNTY 106
ST. LOUIS CITY 107
ST. LOUIS CITY 107
ST. LOUIS CITY 107
ST. LOUIS CITY 107
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 108
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 108
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 109
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 108
ST. LOUIS COUNTY 108
DESTINATION NAME I 0
HI TRANS 501
Ml TRANS 501
Ml TRANS 501
Ml TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
MIC TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
MIC TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 51*
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 51*
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
H7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
H7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
«6 PROCESSING 506
M9 TRANS 509
H9 TRANS 509
M9 TRANS 509
M6 PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
H6 PROCESSING 506
H6 PROCESSING 506
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
39.1000
50.8000
75.9000
98.8000
65.5000
93.6000
1*3.5000
202.4000
0.0
O.O
0.0
0.0
230.0999
350.2996
0.0
361.699S.
189.4999
702.2996
10.2000
25.1000
3*. 8000
14.8000
79.3000
114.6000
195.3000
271.OOOO
356.2000
**9.0999
636.0994
803.3997
795.2996
895.5999
1070.2996
1205.3997
838.7000
1075.2996
1582.2000
2005.0020
37.1976
MODEL
PERIOD
1
Z
3
*
1
2
3
*
1
2
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
*
1
3
*
2
I
2
3
*
I
2
3
*
1
2
3
*
1
2
3
*
4
-------
St. Louis G
Table XXVIII
Page 11 of 13
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARF IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
HI TRANS
Ml TRANS
Ml TRANS
Ml TRANS
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M9 TRANS
M9 TRANS
M9 TRANS
H9 TRANS
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS
I 0
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
501
501
501
501
507
507
507
507
509
509
509
509
510
510
510
510
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
TRANSFER
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKH
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
PKR
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TD
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
«6 PROCESSING 506
H6 PROCESSING 506
N6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
«6 PROCESSING 506
H10 TRANS/PYRDLYSI5 510
M6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
N6 PROCESSING 506
H6 PROCESSING 506
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
39.1000
50.80UO
75.9000
98.8000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
114.0000
195.3000
371.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MODEL
Pi-RIUO
1
z
3
*
1
2
3
*
1
2
3
-------
St. Louis G
Table XXVIII
Page 12 of 13
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS Of TONS PER YEAR
o
in
SITE NAME I D
Ml TRANS 501
HI TRANS 501
Ml TRANS 501
Ml TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
»6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
Mi PROCESSING 506
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
MT TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/CYROLYSIS 507
M9 TRANS 509
M9 TRANS 509
M9 TRANS 509
M9 TRANS 509
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
M1O TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
MIC TRANS/PVROLYSIS 510
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
M10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 514
A19 VIGUS OUARRY 711
A19 VIGUS OUARRY 711
A19 VIGUS OUARRY 711
A19 VIGUS OUARRY 711
PROCESS NAHJ I 0
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYRDLYSIS 935
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
GAS PYROLYSIS 935
SHREDDED FUEL/S6C RC 955
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
SANITARY LANDFILL 907
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
39.100T
50. 800 C
75.9000
98.8000
2226.8937
3447.5950
3447.5874
2466.3992
0.0
0.0
B25.5939
825.5989
1505.6995
0.0
114.6000
195.3000
271.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
406.9971
O.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MODEL
PERIOD
1
2
3
4
2
3
<•
1
1
2
2
3
**
1
i
3
4
1
2
Z
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
-------
St. Louis G
8
Table XXVIII
CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITY LEVELS
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
Page 13 of 13
SITE NAME I 0
Ml TRANS 501
Ml TRANS 501
M6 PROCESSING 506
H6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
»6 PROCESSING 506
H7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 507
M7 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 5P7
M9 TRANS 509
M9 TRANS 509
«10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Hlfi TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
Win TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
«10 TRANS/PYROLYSIS 510
111 MKT/PROCeSSINS 51*
Ul MKT/PROCESSING 51*
A19 VIGUS QUARRY 711
A19 VISUS OUARRY 711
PROCESS NAME
TRANSFER PKR TO KAN
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
5AS PYROLYSIS
5AS PYROLYSIS
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
SAS PYROLYSIS
GAS PYROLYSIS
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN
GAS PYROLYSIS
GAS PYROLYSIS
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC
SANITARY LANDFILL
SANITARY LANDFILL
I D
901
901
935
935
955
955
901
901
935
935
901
901
901
901
935
935
955
955
907
907
MODEL
PERIOD
1
4
2
3
4
1
1
4
2
4
1
2
1
4
2
4
1
4
1
3
CAPACITY UNDERUTILIZATION ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I D
HI TRANS 501
HI TRANS 501
N6 PROCESSING 506
M6 PROCESSING 506
M9 TRANS 509
H9 TRANS 509
MODEL
PROCESS NAME I 0 PERIOD
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 1
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 2
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955 2
SHREDDED FUEL/SEC RC 955 3
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 2
TRANSFER PKR TO VAN 901 3
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
75.9000
98.8000
2226.8987
1220.6963
0.0
2466.3992
0.0
0.0
B25.5989
690.0994
0.0
271.000C
0.0
0.0
0.0
406.9971
0.0
0.0
C.O
0.0
:AR
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
36.8000
25.1000
2466.3992
2466.3992
156.4000
75.7000
LINEAR
SEGMENT
2
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
I
LAND CONSTRAINT ACTIVITY LEVELS OF SLACKS IN ACRE-FEET
SITE
711
ACTIVITY LEVEL
20000.0000
-------
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
Table XXIX Page 1 of 4
OUTPUTS FOR N. E. MASSACHUSETTS A
(Phase 3 Solution)
1071.0181 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL
COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1218.1 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS .879 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY FOR SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE PAIRS
IS5
o
Origin
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
no
111
112
113
114
Destination
501
503
503
504
504
506
507
507
507
510
503
512
514
514
Activity Level*
189.7
157.7
55.7
43.4
12.0
45.8
129.1
38.3
53.4
108.0
115.1
186.0
11.4
72.5
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A Table XXIX Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE PAIRS
Origin Site
501
502
503
503
504
504
504
506
506
507
507
510
512
514
514
514
Origin Process
901
901
905
925
901
905
905
901
905
901
905
901
915
901
905
925
Destination
503
503
644
644
503
643
644
503
643
503
643
503
634
503
643
643
Activity Level*
189.7
0
134.1728
0
55.4
0
0
45.8
0
220.8
0
108.0
46.5
83.9
0
0
r\j
o
oo
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A
Table XXIX
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR THE CATEGORY 5 PAIRS
INJ
s
Origin Site
512
633
634
637
643
644
647
Origin Process
915
936
936
936
946
946
946
Destination
712
603
614
607
603
614
607
Activity Level*
0
0
46.5
0
0
134.1728
0
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A
Table XXEC
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
Page ^ of k
Origin Site
501
502
503
504
506
507
510
512
514
607
614
633
634
637
643
644
647
704
705
706
708
709
710
711
713
Origin Process
901
901
905
901
901
901
901
915
901
906
906
936
936
936
946
946
946
907
907
907
907
907
907
907
907
Activity Level*
189.7
0
1032.0989
55.4
45.8
220.8
108.0
186.0
83.9
0
180.6728
0
46.5
0
0
134.1728
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linear Segment
3
1
3
1
1
3
2
1
2
- 1
2
1
1
1
1
1 . -
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
ro
o
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
Table XXX Page 1 of 4
OUTPUTS FOR N. E. MASSACHUSETTS A-2
(Phase 4 Solution)
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS 1179.8943 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL
COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1218.1 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS .96864 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY FOR SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE PAIRS
Origin
101
102
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Destination
501
502
503
503
504
504
506
507
507
507
510
503
512
514
514
Activity Level*
189.7.
.0003
157.6997
55.7
43.4
12.0
45.8
129.1
38.3
53.4
108.0
115.1
i
186.0
11.4
72.5
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
E. Mass. A-2
Table XXX
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE PAIRS
PO
ro
Origin Site
501
502
503
504
504
506
506
507
• 510
512
512
514
514
Origin Process
901
901
905
901
905
901
905
901
901
915
915
901
905
Destination
503
503
647
503
647
507
647
503
507
634
637
503
647
Activity Level*
189.7
0
85.4749
55.4
0
45.8
0
0
108.0
0
46.5
83.8999
0
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A-2
Table XXX
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR THE CATEGORY 5 PAIRS
Origin Site
503
503
507
514
1 514
633
634
637
643
644
647
Origin Process
905
925
905
905
925
936
936
936
946
946
946
Destination
643
643
647
644
644
603
614
607
603
614
607
Activity Level*
0
0
48.6980
0
0
0
0
46.5
0
0
134.1729
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A-2
Table XXX
Page 4 of 4
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
Origin Site
501
503
504
506
507
510
. 512
514
607
633
637
643
644
647
Origin Process
901
905
901
901
905
901
915
901
906
936
936
946
946
946
Activity Level*
189.7
657.499
55.4
45.8
374.5999
108.0
186.0
83.8999
180.6729
0
46.5
0
0
134.1729
Linear Segment
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
Table XXXI Page 1 of 4
OUTPUTS FOR N. E. MASSACHUSETTS A-3
(Phase 3 Solution)
877.3237 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL
COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1218.1 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS .720239 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE PAIRS
Origin
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
no
in
112
113
114
Destination
501
502
502
504
514
506
507
507
507
510
502
512
514
514
Activity Level*
189.7
157.7
55.7
43.4
12.0
45.8
129.1
38.3
53.4
108.0
115.1
186.0
11.4
72.5
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A-3
Table XXXI
Page 2 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE PAIRS
Origin Site
501
502
503
503
504
504
• 506
506
507
507
510
512
514
514
Origin Process
901
901
905
925
901
905
901
905
901
905
901
915
901
901
Destination
514
514
647
647
514
644
514
644
514
644
514
634
503
507
Activity Level*
189.7
328.4998
0
0
43.4
0
45.8
0
220.8
0
108.0
46.5
0
0
ro
ov
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A-3
Table XXXI
Page 3 of 4
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY DATA FOR THE CATEGORY 5 PAIRS
Origin Site
514
514
633
634
. 637
643
644
647
Origin Process
905
925
936
936
936
946
946
946
Destination
644
644
603
614
607
603
614
607
Activity Level*
134.1729
0
0
46.5
0
0
134.1729
0
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
N. E. Mass. A-3
Table XXXI
Page 4 of 4
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
ro
M*
00
Origin Site
501
502
504
506
507
510
512
514
603
607
614
633
634
637
643
644
647
Origin Process
901
901
901
901
901
901
915
905
906
906
906
936
936
936
946
946
946
Activity Level*
189.7
328.4998
43.4
45.8
220.8
108.0
186.0
1032.0991
0
0
180.6729
0
46.5
0
0
134.1729
0
Linear Segment
3
3
1
1
3
2
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Activity Levels in thousands of tons per year.
-------
Table XXXII
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts A-4
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS 825.0811 IN THOUSANDS bF DOLLARS PER
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1Z19.09?* IN THOUSANDS & TONS PER CEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS .'(177351 PER TONl
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY L?:VSL lUTi. f-M T
'ACTIVITY L^VtL-i AK: I..
INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING Of- PACKfK
TOJKCF fi) INTERMr niftlc FACILITY PAIHIS)
THOUSANDS 'IF TUHS PE>< YEAR
ORIGIN NAME
SOUTH ?S<;FX OUTER
LAWRENCE
HAVERHUL
NSW9URYPUBT
E CENTRAL EESt*
GLflUCEiT-R
LOWELL c»ST
IS LUWELL WTJT
VO LOWELL SDUTrl
SAST NtmLfSfX
NrW HAM3*\rilK;:
RESCO COMMUNITIES
S W CENTRAL ESSEX
SOUTH ESJ.CX INM:R
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY
•ACTI
Ml I'HSTINATI
101 .SiLcM TNCI
102 frMVcRHILL
103 H&VI3.1ILL
104 Mt-.WKUR YPi.K
105 \irWfrt KY^iR
106 .iLnu-'.^STt-!
107 L'.'HCLL T.C
1C9 LT.WfLL INC
1C? L'lWSLL )\l".
11C .":i XTJ^L'i
111 HAV£r("ILL
112 1TSCG PKUC
113 ^C C^StX I
11* 50 :Si;» I
il\ NAH-r M"
Ne-«ATPR'/TK 501
HKJC 1 5. SI ^.i 5f 3
PRJCrSSIN'li 503
T T1/IMOC "(•<,
T TR/PrtUC 504
T-.~t?
~'Si>I-'^u 51..'
\i-JtR TR/PR 514
NNER TPl/Prt 514
ACTIVITY
II, UEVSL 4
1P9.7.0PP
157.701,1
55.70OO
4J.40CC
1 ^ . OCO 0
45. TOOT
U9.10CC.
38.20f.O
') -i .4l--ui;
1C.-1.CCOC
115.1000
lr!c> .0000
11.4000
72.5000
LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE Tu INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
VITY LEVELS ARE IN THC
OfUGJN SITE MAKE ORIGIN PROCESS NAME
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWRENCE INC IN/TRANS 50.!
NEWBURYPORT TR/PHOC 5C4
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PRUC 50i
GLOUCESTER TR/PSJC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 51C
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNEfi TR/PH 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER fTATION
SHUEDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATinrn
SHREDDci) rUrl
TRANSf-fK STATI'lJ.
SHREDUE ') FU=L
TRANSFER STAIIiiN
RESCiJ PKHCtSS
T»ANSF=R STATION
SHREOD=D FUEL
ORIED SHR= DDE D f-jc.L
(US ANUS PF TONS PEfi
DESTINATION SITE
901 HAVRHTLL
901 lAV^SrtlLL
901 HAVEkHILL
^05 riA^ OUM^Y
Orj HAV-HKI LL
905 HAV L'u'MMf
?C1 rt«ViR.iILL
•JO 5 HAV "5JMMY
•JC! HAViKHILL
915 HAS? DUXrtY
90) HAvf-'SHIL'.
905 -*Ai* OU^^Y
^25 HAV nuiu«y
YEAR
NAME
!»*0:rSSINb
PROCcSSlNG
PROCESSING
ftAVY C\D
PKO:ESSI.PJG
HEAVY ENJ
P'4J 0 tU
•>i'J 10'.. i.l '.C
'-"> 46.DUOO
5u3 '.3.VOK
o4.-. 0.0
"><..-! r. ,u
-------
N. E. Mass. A-4
Table XXXII
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIKCSI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
HAVERHILL PROCESS INS 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LHL DUMMY TNCIN RES 617
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX HUM HEAVY END 644
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL
DUMMY INCIN RESI3UE
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE
DUMMY INCIN
DUMMY HEAVY FND
DUMMY HEAVY END
DUMMY HEAVY END
DESTINATION SITE NAME
905
92!.
936
936
936
«46
*46
946
ACTIVITY
LEVEL*
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
rtAV DUMMY HEAVY END
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV
HAVCRHILL SCDY RtCOV
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV
LIMELL EA SCPY R.cCOV
643
643
603
&14
6C7
603
614
607
134.173C
. .0,0, . .. .
46.5pOCl
0.0.1
C.Oj
134,17.30
c.of
ro
ro
o
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS Of TOJ1S PER YEAR
SITE NAME
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAURENCE JNCIN/TRANS 5O2
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURVPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
LOWELL EA SCOY RECOV 607
SO ESX INR SCOY RECV 614
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LHL DUMMY INCIN RES 63T
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LULDUMMY HEAVY END 647
PROCESS NAME
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUtL 90b
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCO PROCESS 915
TRANSFER STATION 901
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HfcAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
ACTIVITY LINEAR
LEVEL • SEGMENT
189.7000
1032. P991
55.4QGC
45.BOOC'
£20.8000
H-J.OOCP
B3.9000
180.673C
0.0
0.0
46.500C
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
3
1
1
_ 3
2
2 ~~
i...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 . .. .
-------
Table XXXIII
Outputs for N.E. Massachusetts B-l
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS -1807.6484 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS Z4J6.19B7 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS -0.7420 PER TON " " '" ~ ~'
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIfUS)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
INJ
ro
ORIGIN NAME i D
SOUTH. ESSEX OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102
HAVERMILL IO3
NEWBURYPORT 104
E CFNTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER 106
LOWELL EAST 107
LOWELL WEST 108
LOWELL SOUTH 109
EAST MIDDLESEX 110
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 113
SOUTH ESSEX INNER 114
DESTINATION NAME I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX IHNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
379.3999
315.3999
111.4000
36.8000
24.0000
91.6000
2S8.2000
76.6000
106.8000
216.0000
230.2000
372.0000
22.8000
145.0000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWRENCE INC IN/TRANS 502
NEMBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 5O7
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
so ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCO PROCESS 915
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAV DUMMY
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
INCIN RES
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
HEAVY END
503
503
503
643
503
643
503
643
503
633
503
643
643
ACTIVITY
L6V6L •
379.3999
0.0
110.8000
0.0
91.6000
0.0
441.5996
0.0
216.0000
93.0000
167.8000
0.0
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. B-l
Table XXXIII
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIRtS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I D
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INC IN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
Page 2 of 2
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
268.3457
0-P
93.0OOO
0.0
0.0
268.3457
0.0
0,0
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ro
ro
FVJ
SITE NAME I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAURENCE INCIN/TRANS 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEMSURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 51Z
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUN HEAVY END 644
LWLDUMHY HEAVY END 647
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCO PROCESS 915
TRANSFER STATION 901
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
ACTIVITY
LEVEL •
379.3999
0.0
2064.1987
110.8000
91.6OOO
441.5996
216.0000
372.0000
167.8000
361 .3455
0.0
0.0
93.0000
0.0
0.0
268.3457
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
3
Z
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
-------
Table XXXIV
Outputs for N.E. Massachusetts B-2
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS 1*48.4475 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 609.3994 IN THOUSANDS Of TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 2.3768 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME I D
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102
HAVERMILL 103
NEWBURYPORT 104
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER 106
LOWELL EAST 107
LOWELL WEST 108
LOWELL SOUTH 109
EAST MIDDLESEX 110
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 113
SOUTH ESSEX INNER 114
DESTINATION NAME I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURYPORT TR/PRQC 504
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
94.9000
78.9000
27.9000
21.7000
6.0000
22.9000
64.6000
19.2000
26.7000
54.0000
57.6000
93.0000
5.7OOO
36.3000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE Tn INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR1S1
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
SALE* INCINERATOR/TR
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS
HAVERHILL PROCESSING
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS
RESCO PROCESSING
RESCO PROCESSING
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
I 0
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
501
502
503
504
504
506
506
507
507
510
512
512
514
514
514
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
RESCO PROCESS
RESCO PROCESS
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FU6L
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL
901
901
905
90T
905
901
905
901
905
901
915
915
901
905
925
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV OUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV OUMMY INCIN RES 633
LWL OUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV OUMMY HEAVY END 643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
94.9000
0.0
67.1319
27.7000
0.0
22.9000
0.0
110.5000
0.0
54.0000
0.0
23.2500
42.0000
0.0
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. B-2
Table XXXIV
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIRCS1
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME 1 D
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LHL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 6*3
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 64*
LHLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I n
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL £A SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV O07
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.2500
0.0
0.0
67.1319
PROCESSING ACTIVITY L=VELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
SITE NAME I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 50]
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 5M
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LHLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCO PROCESS 915
TRANSFER STATION 901
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
94.9000
0.0
516.3992
27.7000
22.9000
110.5000
54.0000
93.0000
42.0000
90.3819
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.2500
0.0
67.1319
LINEAR
SEGMENT
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
-------
Table XXXV
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts C-l
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS -1806.1833 IN THOUSANDS (if Di)LL.V<5 PC k 1 • M I NCLJ')I '!'• 4LI. LISTS fHOH LOADING OH PACr.FR TRUCK.:
TOTAL TONNAGE ID 1Z.1S.09B9 IN THIHISANPS OF TON: PFK Y"»l<
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS -1.5485 PER T;W
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LSJEL DATJ. FOR T.I6 >UURC-: ro INT ER1!fHATE FACILITY PAIRtSI
*ACTIVITY LeVSLS AK- IN THOUSAND! OH TUNS ȣ* YEAR
ORIGIN NAME 1 D
SOUTH Esrnt OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102.
HAVERHILL 103
NEWBURYPHRT 10*
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER 106
LOWELL EAST 107
LOWELL WEST 108
LOWELL SOUTH "" " ~'1O9
EAST HIOOLESEX 110
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S W CENTRAL Essex 113
SOUTH ESSEX INNER 11*
DESTINATION N4MT I D
SALEM INCINERATrjR/TR 501
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 5n?
HAV'RHILL PROCESSIN3 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PRUC 5C7
LOWELL INCIN/TH/PROC 507
LOWELL INCINm/DKOC 507
6' MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO PROCESSING ' 512
HAVERHILL PROCESS IMr, 503
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
199.7000
157.7000
55.7^50
43.4000
12.0000
45.8000
129.1CCO
33.3(H>G
S3.4000"
108.0000
115.1000
IBS.0000
11.4COO
77.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DftTH FOR Tut" INTM^eiUATf. TiJ INTERMEDIA^ FACILITY PAI-<(.">>
• ACTIVITY LEVELS AH= I"J THOUSANDS JF TOM^ P^? YEAR
ORIGIN SIT=
SALEM INCINERArrjR/TX
LAWRSNC; INCIN/TRANS
HAVERHILL PKUCESSIN"
NEW6LIRYPORT TR/PROC
NEHBURYPDRT TR/PRQC
GLOUCESTER TR/PKOC
GLOUCESTER TR/IMO",
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
LOH^LL INCr''i/TR/PfJJC,
EA MinDLES"/ rRAN.1;
RESCO PROCESSING
RESCO PROCESSING
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PK
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
I n
501
50^
50i
504
504
5C*
5Qo
507
507
51 '
51?
51^
514
514
514
ORIGIN PROCESS NAMf
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATIJN
SHREDDED RJtL
TRANSFER STATION
SHRcDDED FUSL
TRANSFER STATION'
RESCO PROCESS
RcSCO PROCESS
TRANSFER STATION
SHRIrDDED FUKL
DRIED SHREOUED FU'. L
I n
901
ri<: 1
905
901
905
901
50f.>
901
905
901
915
915
901
905
925
DESTINATION SITE NAME I 0
HAVcRHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVSRHILL PROCESSING 5C3
LWLOUMMY HEAVY END 647
HAVCRHILL PROCESSING 503
HAi/ OUMMY HEAVY tND 643
HAVVRHILL PROCE^^INr, SC/3
HAV DUMMY. HEAVY CMO 643
HAVFRHUL PROCESSING 5C3
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERrilLL PROCESSING 403
HAV DUMMY INC!U R,:S 633
LrVL DUMMY INCIN RfcS 637
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY HEAVY SNl) 643
HAV DIJMHY HEAVY =NQ 643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.70CO
O.C
1J4.17,30
0.0
C.C
45.TOOO
C.C,
iio.scor
O.C'
1P8.COOC
n.'o
46.5000
72.50Qfi
0.0
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. C-1
Table XXXV
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL i)ATA FOR THE
*ACTIVIT' LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS
ORISIN SITE NAME I f)
HAV5RHHL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
WAV DUMMY INCIN RgS 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIM RS 6J4
LWL DUMMY INCIN REE 637
HAV UUMMY HEAVY FMU 643
SO SX DUM HEAVY END 644
LHLDUMMY HEAVY END 6*7
ORIGIN PROCESS NAMF
WHERE APPLICABLE,
SHRUDDSD =UEL
DBI'jD SHRPDD50 FU'JL
DUMMY INCIN RfSIOll-
OUM.1Y INCIN R-iSI'WC-
PUMMY INCIN R^SIJJf
OUMMY HCAVY tl>fi5
OU^MY HEAVY END
DUMMY HEAirr END
905
925
536
9=.6
936
:'.TE3l)RY i=IVE PAIS(S)
OF TONS f"M YEAR
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV OJMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 64?
HAVERHILL SCDY RECUV 60S
SO =SX IHR SCDY RECV 414
LQHELL EA SCDY R2COV 607
.1AVERHILL SCOY RECUV 603
SCI FSX INR SCDY RECV 614
LCM^LL =A SCOY RECOV 607
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
C.D
C.C
0.0
0.0
46.50CT
c.o
0.0
134.i7:9.7000
0.0
1032 .6991
0.0
45.8000
220.3000
100 .OOOO
136.0000
72.5000
ISO .6730
o.O
0.0
0.0
46.5000
0.6'
134.1730
LINEAR
SEGMENT
3
?.
3
1
1
3
7.
1
I
2
1
1
1
1
1"
1
-------
Table XXXVI
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts C-2
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS
289.5099 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
1218.0989 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS
0.2378 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ACTIVITY
ORIGIN NAME I D DESTINATION NAME I D
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101 SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWRENCE 102 HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL 103 HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
N6WBURYPORT 104 NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105 HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
GLOUCESTER 106 GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL EAST 107 LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL WEST 108 LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL SOUTH 109 EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
EAST MIDDLESEX 110 EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111 HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112 RESCD PROCESSING 512
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 113 SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SOUTH ESSEX INNER 114 SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
LEVEL *
189.7000
157.7000
55.7000
43.40OO
12.0000
45.8000
129.1000
38.3000
53.4000
108.0000
115.10OO
186.OOOO
11.4000
72.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TU INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRCSI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I D ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D DESTINATION SITE NAME
SALEM INCINERATQR/TR 5O1 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
LAWRENCE 1NCIN/TRANS 502 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504 SHREDDED FUEL 905 HAV DUMMY HEAVY ENP
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506 SHREDDED FUEL 905 . HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507 SHREDDED FUEL 905 HAV DUMMY HEAVY SND
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
RESCO PROCESSING 512 RESCO PROCESS 915 HAV DUMMY INCIN RES
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514 TRANSFER STATION 901 HAVERHILL PROCESSING
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514 SHREDDED FUEL 905 HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514 DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925 HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
I D
503
503
503
643
503
643
503
643
503
633
503
643
643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
169.70OO
0.0
43.40OO
0.0
45.8000
0.0
167.4000
0.0
161.4000
46,5000
83.9000
0.0
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. C-2
Table XXXVI
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR(S)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I D
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 63*
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 6*4
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 6*7
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
WHERE APPLICABLE,
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 9*6
DESTINATION SITE NAME 1 D
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 6*3
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 6*3
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 61*
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
13*.1730
O.O
46.50OO
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
IS3
CO
CO
SITE NAME I 0
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAURENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEHBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 51*
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 63*
LHL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 6**
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 6*7
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCO PROCESS 915
TRANSFER STATION 901
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 9*6
DUMMY HEAVY END 9*6
DUMMY HEAVY END 9*6
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
0.0
1032.0991
43.4000
45.SOOO
167.4000
161.4000
186.0000
B3.900O
180.6730
0.0
O.O
46.5000
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
3
2
3
1
1
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
Table XXXVII
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts C-3
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE is 34i9.i2B9 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 121B.0989 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS . 2.8069 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAR
ro
ro
ORIGIN NAME I 0
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102
HAVERHILL 103
NEWSURYPORT 104
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER 106
LOWELL EAST 107
L3WELL WEST 103
LOWELL SOUTH 109
EAST MIDDLESEX 110
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S H CENTRAL ESSEX 113
SOUTH ESSEX INNER 114
DESTINATION NAME I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURYPDRT TR/PRUC 504
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LJWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LUWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
H4VERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PS 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
157.7000
55.7000
43.4000
12.0000
45.8000
129.1000
38.3000
53.4000
108.0000
115.1000
1S6.0000
11.4000
72.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC
N6WBURYPDRT TR/PROC
GLOUCESTER TR/PRQC
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS
RESCO PROCESSING
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSCX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
501
502
504
504
506
506
507
507
510
512
514
514
514
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
RESCO PROCESS
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL
901
901
901
905
901
905-
901
905
901
915
901
905
925
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
HAVERHILL PROCESSING
HAVERHILL PROCESSING
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
HAVERHILL PROCESSING
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES
HAVERHILL PROCESSING
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END
514
503
503
643
514
643
503
643
514
633
503
643
643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
157.70OO
43.40OO
0.0
45.9000
0.0
0.0
26.7040
106.0000
46.5000
0.0
57.1220
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. C-3
Table XXXVII
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIRISI
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LMLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
48.3470
0.0
46.5000
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
OJ
o
SITE NAME I D
SALE* INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAURENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
LOWELL EA SCDY R6COV 607
SO ESX INR SCOY RECV 614
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LWLDUMNY HEAVY END 647
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCD PROCESS 915
SHREDDED FUEL 905
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
189.7000
157.7000
371.8989
43.4000
45.80OO
220.8000
108.0000
186.0000
439.3994
180.6730
0.0
0.0
46.5000
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
3
3
2
I
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
Table XXXVIII
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts D-l
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS 910.2827 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAK INCLUDING ALL CUSTS FROM LOADING OF i>AC*ER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1218.0989 IN THOUSANDS OF TON1; PER YEAR
*VERAGE SYSTFM COST !S 0.7473 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS HF TONS PER YEAR
ro
oo
ORIGIN NAME I a
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102
HAVERHILL 103
NEK3JRYPORT 104
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTiK 106
LOW;I_L E1ST 107
LOWELL W=ST 103
LOWELL SOUTH 109
£AST MIDDLESEX 110
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 113
SOUTH :SSEX INNER 114
DESTINATION NAME I 0
SALE* INCINERATOR/TK 501
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
NEWBURYPOST TR/PROC 5C4
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TP./PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 501
RESCO PROCESSING 5U
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 51*
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 51*
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
157.7000
55.7000
43.4000
12.0000
45.8000
129.1000
38.3000
53.4000
108.0000
115.1000
136.0000
11.4000
72.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR TH? INTEKMEllIATc TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS AR? IN THOUSANDS OF TO^S PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
SALF.M INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWSENCf INCIN/TRANS 502
NEWBURYP'JRT TR/PROC 504
NEWBURYPORT TR/FRDC 5O4
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TR4NS 510
RESCn PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PH 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION.
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
RESCO PROCESS
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
901
901
901
905
901
905
901
905
901
915
901
905
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVBRHILL
HAV DUMMY
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
INC IN RES
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
503
503
503
643
503
643
503
643
503
633
503
643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
1H9.7000
157.0989
55.40CO
0.0
45.8000
0.0
0.0
108.0COO
46.5000
-------
N. E. Mass. D-l
Table XXXVIII
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FDR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAR
CWTSIN SITE NAME
HAVESHILL PROCFSSINS SOS
HAVErtHILL PROCESSIN5 503
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
SD ESSEX INNcR TR/PR 51*
SO L'iSCX INNER TR/PH 514
HAV 1IJMMY TNCIN KcS 63S
SO EX DUMMY IMCIN US 634
LWL DUMKY INCIN HES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO FX [>UM HEAVY END 644
LHLOUM4Y HEAVY ENn 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I U
V.HERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
SHREDDED FUEL 905
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
3MMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 64n
SD EX DUM HEAVY END 644
HAVERHTLL SCOY RECUV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY SECV 61*.
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SU ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
134.1729
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
46.50OO
0.0
G.O
134.1729
0.0
0.0
PO
CO
INJ
S4Lr-M INCINrRATOR/TR
LAWKfNCE INCIN/TRANS
HAV!=ISH1LL PROCESSING
NE^I^-fPO'tT TR/PRDC
SLOUCESTcp TR/PRIK
LDW=LL INCIM/TR/PROC
=A «TlULtSEX TRANS
RESCM P^DCrSSING
Sn :.-;.5£;X INNER TR/PR
••HV51-JL!- SCDY RECOV
HAV WM1Y INilIN RES
Sn CX D'JMIY INCtN ».S
LWL DUMMY INCIN HZS,
HAl? ni'M«Y rlSAVY ?NI'
50 :-< JU« H^AVY FNI)
LKLIW-WY H£AVY I?NH
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
I J PROCESS NAME I 0
501 TRANSFER STATION 901
502 TRANSFER 'STATION 9C1
SO* SHREDDED FUEL 905
50* TRANSFER STATION 901
50= TRANSFER STATION 901
507 TRANSFER STATION 901
510 TRANSFER STATION 901
512 RESCO PROCESS 915
514 TRANSFER STATION 901
603 SECONDARY RECOVERY 90b
633 iWMMY INCIN RESIDUE 93t
634 3U1MY INCIN RESIDUE 936
637 DUMMY INCIN RESIDUF 936
643 IXJMMY HEAVY END 946
t,v, OUHHY HEAVY END 946
641 DUMMY HEAVY END 946
ACTIVITY
LEVEL •
189.7000
157.6939
1032.0994
55.4000
45.8000
220.7999
108.0000
1S6.0000
83.9000
180.6729
46.5000
0.0
0.0
134.1729
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
3
3
3
1
1
3
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
Table XXXIX
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts D-2
(Phase 3 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS 3299.3501. IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS P5S YFA* INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OK PACKER
TOTAL TDNNASE IS 1218.0981) IN THOUSANDS Of TONS PER YbUR
AVERAGE SYSTtM COST IS
2.7086 PER TON
ISi
CO
10
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE T(l INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIMS)
*ACT1VITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME 1 D
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101
LAURENCE 102
MAVERHILL 101
NEWBURYPORT 104
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER lOi
LOWFLL EASI 10?
LOWELL WEST 103
LOWELL KEST 108
LOWELL SOUTH 109
EAST MIDDLESEX 110
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 1U
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 113
SOUTH ESSEX INMFH 114
DESTINATION NAME I 0
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 5C2
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 403
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PUlK 507
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
LAWRENCE TNCIN/TRANS 50i
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
3ESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PS 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
157.7000
S5.7000
43.4000
12.0000
45.8000
129.1000
3.7967
34.5032
53.4000
103.0000
115.1000
186.0000
11.400C
72.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATt TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRIS)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PES YEAR
ir,IN sfn HAUL
SALEM INCI^E.IATOR/rR 501
LAWRENCE INCIN/T'UNS 502
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
NEWSURYPfjKT TK/I'ROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
GLOUCESTER TR/PP.IJC 506
LOWELL INC1N/TR/PKOC 507
el MIDnLFSEX TRAMS 510
RFSCO PROCESSING 512
REf,rO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNCR TH/PR 514
SO fSSEX INNER IK/PR 514
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I n
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
RESCO PROCESS
RESCO PROCESS
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
901
901
901
901
905
981
905
901
901
915
915
901
906
DESTINATION SITE NiMf I D
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PH 514
HAV DUMMY HeAVY END 643
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PK 514
HAlf DUMMY HEAVY tND 643
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV OUMMY INCIN RES 633
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
LWLOUMMY HEAVY END 647
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7OOO
461.1235
46.7755
43.3999
0.0
t>7.?999
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
46.5000
0.0
55.0647
-------
N. E. Mass. D-2
Table XXXIX
Page 2 of 2
TRtNiPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL UATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR1SI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS A«E IN THOUSANDS OF TUNS PER YEAR
ORIRIN SITE NAMt
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
LOWELL I")f.IN/TR/l>kOC 507
SO E5SFX INNER TR/PK 511,
SO = SSEX INNER TR/PR •>!«
HAV C1UM1Y INC.IN RFS 633
SO EX DUMMY TNCM RS *34
LWL OU1MY INCIN RES 437
HAV niJHMY HEAVY END 643
SO FX HUH HEAVY HMD 644
LWLfHIMMY HSAVY ENO 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 90->
DRIED SHREDDED FJtL Vi'i
SHKfDDED FUEL 905
SHREDDED FUEL 905
^RIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIN RESIOU1; 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
!>U»MT INCIN R6SIBO? 935
DUMMY HEAVY ENP 946
DUMMY HEAVY ENO 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAl/ DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY H6AVY END 643
LHLOUMHY HEAVY END 647
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
HAVERHILL SCOY R6COV 6O3
SO ESX INR SCDY RFC; 614
LOrfELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INK SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
0.0
0.0
64.4315
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
46.5000
0.0
0.0
119.4962
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TOMS PEK YEAR
SITE NAME I D
5ALCM INCINIrRATUR/Tk SOI
LAWRENCE INtlN/TRANS 50?
HAVERHILi PROCESSING %C3
N?HSUHrPOrtT TR/PPOC i>04
SLOUC^STM TR/PROC V't
LOWELL INCIN/TS/PROC ?C7
EA MIODLFTCK TRsNL 410
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX IN'JER TR/PR S14
Lll«€LL EA SCOY ftECOV 607
HAV 3JMHY INCIN RF5 633
SO FX DUMMY INCFN RS 634
L«tt. DJMHY IMC IN 1ES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY COT e>43
SD c\ DU« HEAVY EMD 644
LMLDUMMY HEAVY fcMl) 647
PROCESS NAME I 0
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRA«S*F
-------
Table XL
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts E-l
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS 1802.0232 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1218.0989 IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS 1.4794 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SDURCt TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIKISI
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS UF TONS PER YEAR
OJ
01
ORIGIN NAME I 0
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102
HAVFRHILL 103
NEWBURYPORT 104
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER 106
LOWELL EAST 10T
LOWELL WEST 108
LOWELL SOUTH 109
EAST MIDDLESEX no
NEW HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 111
SOUTH ESSEX INNER 114
DESTINATION N4MS I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NeWBURYPORT TR/PROC 5D4
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PRDC 507
LOWELL INCIM/Trt/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
157.7000
55.7POC
43.4000
12.0000
45.9000
129.1000
3S.-J001
53.40CO
108. 0001
115.100C
11 .4COO
72.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR
LAURENCE INC IN/TRANS
NEWBURVPORT TR/PROC
NEHBURYPORT TR/PROC
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS
RESCD PROCESSING
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
50!
502
504
504
506
506
507
507
510
512
514
514
514
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
RESCD PROCESS
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL
901
901
901
905
901
905
901
905
901
915
901
905
925
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAV DUMMY
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
INCIN RES
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
HEAVY END
50?
503
503
643
503
643
503
643
503
633
503
643
643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
0.0
55.4000
0.0
45.8000
0.0
2iG.80GG
0.0
108.0000
46.5000
B3.9000
0.0
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. E-l
Table XL
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATE&OSY FIVE PAIRtSl
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TOMS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I D
MAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INC I* RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 6*3
SO EX OUM HEAVY END 644
LWLDUMMY HEAVY END 647
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I 0
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 905
ORIED SHREDDED FUEL 9zs
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY ENO 9fc6
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV DUHMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY R6CV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RF'.V 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
Page 2 of 2
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
134.1730
0.0
46.500C
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
CO
cr>
SITE NAMC I D
SALEM 1NCINERATOR/TH 501
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NEWUURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
SO ESX INR SCOY RECV 614
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWl DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LHI.DUMBY HEAVY END 647
PROCESS NAME I D
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
SHREDDED FUEL 905
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 901
TRANSFER STATION 90J
TRANSFER STATION 901
RESCO PROCESS 915
TRANSFER STATION 901
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
SECONDARY RECOVERY 906
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
ACTIVITY
LEVEL »
189.7000
0.0
1032.0991
55.4000
45 .8000
Z20.8000
108.0000
186.0000
83.9000
180.6730
0.0
0.0
46.5000
J.O
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
LINEAR
SEGMENT
3
2
2
1
1
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
Table XLI
Outputs for N. E. Massachusetts E-2
(Phase 4 Solution)
Page 1 of 2
OBJECTIVE VALUE IS -622.7158 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR INCLUDING ALL COSTS FROM LOADING OF PACKER TRUCKS
TOTAL TONNAGE IS 1218.0989 IN THOUSANDS flF TONS PER YEAR
AVERAGE SYSTEM COST IS
-0.5112 PER TON
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE SOURCE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIRISI
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN NAME I 0
SOUTH ESSEX OUTER 101
LAWRENCE 102
HAVERHILL 103
NEWBURYPORT 10*
E CENTRAL ESSEX 105
GLOUCESTER 106
LOWELL EAST 107
LOWELL WEST 108
LOWELL SOUTH 109
EAST MIDDLESEX 110
NEK HAMPSHIRE 111
RESCO COMMUNITIES 112
S W CENTRAL ESSEX 113
SOUTH ESSEX INNER lit
DESTINATION NAME I D
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
NFHBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
RESCO PROCESSING 51?
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
189.7000
157.7000
55.7000
43.4000
12.0000
45.8000
129.1000
38.3000
53.4000
108.0000
115.1000
186.0000
11.4000
72.5000
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE INTERMEDIATE TO INTERMEDIATE FACILITY PAIR(S)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME
SALEM INCINERATOR/TR 501
LAWRENCE INCIN/TRANS 502
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
NEWBURYPORT TR/PROC 504
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
GLOUCESTER TR/PROC 506
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
LOWELL INCIN/TR/PROC 507
EA MIDDLESEX TRANS 510
RESCO PROCESSING 512
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
SO ESSEX INNER TR/PR 514
ORIGIN PROCESS NAMe I D
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
SHREDDED FUEL
TRANSFER STATION
RESCO PROCESS
TRANSFER STATIDN
SHREDDED FUEL
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
901
901
901
905
901
905
901
905
901
915
901
905
9?S
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL
HAV DUMMY
HAVERHILL.
HAV DUMMY
HAV DUMMY
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
PROCESSING
INCIN RES
PROCESSING
HEAVY END
HEAVY ENO
503
503
503
643
503
t>43
i03
643
503
633
503
543
643
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
139.7000
0.0
55.4000
0.0
45.8000
0.0
220.8000
0.0
108.0000
46.5000
B3.9000
0.0
0.0
-------
N. E. Mass. 1-2
Table XLI
Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITY LEVEL DATA FOR THE CATEGORY FIVE PAIR(S)
*ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ORIGIN SITE NAME I D
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAVERHILL PROCESSING 503
HAV DUMMY INCIN RES 633
SO EX DUMMY INCIN RS 634
LWL DUMMY INCIN RES 637
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 6*3
SO EX DUM HEAVY END 644
LWLOUMMY HEAVY END 6*7
ORIGIN PROCESS NAME I D
WHERE APPLICABLE
SHREDDED FUEL 905
DRIED SHREDDED FUEL 925
DUMMY INCIM RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY INCIN RESIDUE 936
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DUMMY HEAVY END 946
DESTINATION SITE NAME I D
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAV DUMMY HEAVY END 643
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY RECV 614
LOWELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
HAVERHILL SCDY RECOV 603
SO ESX INR SCDY *ECV 614
LONELL EA SCDY RECOV 607
ACTIVITY
LEVEL *
134.1730
0.0
46.5000
0.0
0.0
134.1730
0.0
0.0
PROCESSING ACTIVITY LEVELS
•ACTIVITY LEVELS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF TONS PER YEAR
ro
-------
Table XLII Page 1 of 5
CROW-FLY Mode 2 Test (Front-End Only)
(Category 5 activities were provided; all others were generated)
TRANSPORTATION FILE
con? ORIGIN PROCESS SITE DEST.
260 ENTRIES
IIME DISTANCE SPEED
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAVS
TRANS
TRSWS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAN'S
TaiNS
TRANS
TR »NS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TR A,NS
TRANS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
101
111
101
101
101
102
102
102
107
in:
102
10J
103
IPS
103
103
103
114
104
104
l"4
105
105
105
105
105
10 S
106
107
107
in 7
107
107
10S
10 if
ioe
103
109
103
109
109
109
110
IK-
110
no
uc
110
110
111
101
101
101
101
101
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
103
103
103
103
1P3
1C4
104
104
104
105
105
105
105
105
106
106
107
107
107
1-17
107
108
108
10B
108
109
109
109
109
109
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
111
705
70ft
710
712
7U
704
705
70»
709
710
711
713
704
105
710
711
71S
704
715
706
713
704
705
706
710
713
705
706
708
709
710
711
713
7oy
709
710
711
708
709
710
712
713
705
701
709
710
711
712
713
708
15.00
15.60
15.10
5.10
9.50
16.70
17.20
15.60
14.60
IP. 00
9.90
12.70
6.80
13.70
16. SO
11.70
14.50
2.20
11.10
19.90
16.10
U.IO
1.20
1C. 60
19.73
10.80
15.40
4.90
5.20
7.7C
10.90
13.70
19.30
6.0
9. SO
15.50
li.40
9.80
0.0
3.20
19.70
17.70
18.50
15.50
a. 20
0.0
19.10
14.70
9.50
13.90
11.30
11.70
11.30
3.30
7.10
12.50
12.90
11.70
10.90
7.50
7.40
9.50
6.60
10.30
12.40
3. no
10. ao
1.70
n.30
14.90
13.50
9.10
0.90
7.90
14.70
8.10
U.50
3.70
3.90
5.70
fl . 20
10.30
14.50
0.0
7.30
11.50
12.30
7.30
0.0
6.10
14.30
13. 30
13.90
11.60
6.10
0.0
14.30
11.00
7.20
14.20
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
4b.O
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
239
-------
CROW-FLY 2 Test
Table XLII
Page 2 of 5
TRANSPORT
COOJ O^fltN
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
111
11?
112
112.
112
112
113
113
11?
in
113
114
114
114
114
114
TRANS 1 114
TRANS I 101
TRANS
101
TRANS 2 101
TRANS 2 101
TRANS 2 101
TRANS 2 102
TRANS 2 10?
A r i n H
PROCESS
111
112
112
\\Z
112
112
112
113
113
113
113
113
114
114
114
114
114
114
101
101
101
101
101
102
102
TRANS 2 102 102
TSANS 2 102
TRANS
> 102
TRANS 2 102
T'UNS
> 101
TRANS 2 103
TRANS 2 103
T1ANS 2 103
TRANS 2 103
TRANS 2 Ifl*
TRANS 2 10*
TRANS 2 104
TRANS 2 104
TRANS 2 105
TRANS 2 105
TRAMS
' 115
TRANS 2 105
TRANS 2 1C5
TRANS 2 105
TRANS 2 105
TRANS 2 106
TRANS 2 106
TRANS Z 107
TRANS 2 107
TRAMS 2 107
102
1C2
102
103
103
103
103
103
104
104
104
104
105
105
135
105
105
105
105
106
106
107
107
107
F I L b
SITE 1)6 Si".
711
705
709
71C
M2
710
7C4
705
70e>
710
71*
713
705
706
709
7K'
711
713
5CI
506
sir
512
514
502
503
504
5C7
51P
514
502
?C3
504
510
514
502
503
504
506
5C1
503
503
504
506
510
514
501
506
50?
5C3
507
260 E
TIME
5.00
19.70
19.70
14.70
0.0
12.5(1
15.70
5.20
13.20
13.70
15.10
4.40
12.40
16.70
10.00
10.50
s.oo
4.50
0.0
15.60
15.10
5.10
5.30
1.90
5.50
17.80
12. eo
10.00
16.00
6.20 .
3.00
10.30
16. 6C
la.io
15.90
13.20
0.0
19. 9C
16.00
16.40
16.20
10.50
10.60
19.70
12.60
19.80
4.90
12.60
15.70
2.20
NTH
I E
DISTANCE
3. SO
14.30
I4.RO
11.0(1
0
.0
9.30
11.30
3
•i
.90
.90
10.3(1
11
.30
3.30
<»
.30
12.50
13
7
A
3
0
11
11
.5C
.90
.00
.40
.0
.70
.30
3.10
4
I
4
13
9
7
12
4
2
7
12
13
11
9
0
14
12
12
12
7
7
14
9
14
3
9
11
1
.40
.50
.1C
.40
.50
.50
.00
.70
.20
.70
.40
.60
.90
.90
.0
.90
.00
.30
.20
.90
.90
.70
.40
.HO
.70
.50
.BO
.70
S
SPEED
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
240
-------
CROW-FLY 2 Test
Table XLII
Page 3 of 5
T K
TliANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAMS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TK >NS
TRANS
TRA\3
TRAMS
TRANS
TRAMS
TRANS
TKANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TR4NS
TRAJS
TR^^S
TRAN j
TRANS
T<4NS
TRANS
TRANS
T^ ANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAMS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAVIS
TRANS
TRANS
T.RANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
'TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
A 'J S
CT3C-
2
2
2
2
2
?
2
2
.7
2
?
2
•j
2
2
?
t
.'
2
i
-y
2
2
T
I
7
?
3
.?
t
y
>
.7
2
y
?
2
^
-\
^
3
3
3
^
3
3
3
3
PORT
1RISIN
K17
10>1
Iu3
10?
109
Inp
139
Ifl9
109
110
110
110
110
111
110
113
111
111
111
11.!
11-'
11?
n?
in
in
1 1 *
in
113
1 13
113
1 1 3
114
114
114
1 1 't
114
114
114
5^1
531
501
502
502
502
502
503
5T3
503
503
504
A T I 0 N
PROCESS
107
108
1178
103
1C9
1CS
109
109
109
11C
110
110
11C
IK
110
110
111
111
111
112
l\2
112
112
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
905
905
925
925
901
PILE
SITE BEST.
510
502
5C7
51B
502
5C7
310
512
514
501
502
503
5C7
510
512
514
502
503
5(17
501
->IC
512
514
501
502
503
504
5D6
510
512
514
501
502
503
506
510
512
514
506
512
514
503
504
507
514
644
647
444
647
503
2<,0 E
TIME
10.90
17.50
S.90
15.50
16.30
S.20
8.20
19.70
18.40
15.10
11.00
14.90
12.80
0.0
14.70
10.70
15.30
13,70
17.90
5. 1C
14.70
0.0
3.90
11.00
13.40
14.90
14.90
U.20
13.70
15.10
6.40
5.30
14.1C
19. on
16.70
10.50
3. CO
1.00
15.60
5.10
5.80
4.00
15.90
14.80
15.60
18.30
17.70
10.30
17.70
13.20
N T R I E
DISTANCE
0.20
13.20
2.20
11.60
12.20
6.20
6.10
14. BO
13.80
11.30
B.20
11.70
9.60
0.0
11.00
a. oo
11.50
10.30
13.40
3.80
11.00
0.0
6.70
S.20
10.10
11.20
11. 2P
9.90
10. SC-
ll. 30
4.30
3.90
12.10
14.20
12.50
7.90
6.00
0.70
11.70
3. BO
4.40
3.00
11.90
11.10
11.70
13.70
13.30
13.70
13.30
9.90
S
SPEED
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. 0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
241
-------
CROW-FLY 2 Test
Table XLII
Page 4 of 5
T %
TKANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TR4NS
T^ANS
TRA**S
TRftftS
TRANS
TRtMS
TRANS
TRANS
T^ANS
T^A.NS
T^SNS
TRANS
TRANS
Tt^N*
TRANS
TI^AMS
TRANS
TRANS
TR^NS
TK4N *
TRANS
T^ ANS
TrtA.\S
TRANS
TfU.NS
TRANS
TRANS
TSA.NS
TRAMS
TRANS
TRAMS
TKANS
TRANS
TRA.NS
TRAMS
TSVUS
TRANS
TRANS
TKANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
A N S
COOE
,
T|
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
?
3
3
3
-J
3
3
1
3
3
?
3
3
3
*
'.
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
» a R r
ORI.JIM
5"4
504
504
505
504
5H6
505
507
507
507
5 Iff
51 :»
510
51-1
51 ?
514
514
514
5! 4
514
514
•SIT
6< •
£'>4
6.17
64 3
641
644
4V.7
5.-1
5" 1
531
501
501
50 if
50^
5P?
502
502
502
5O2
503
513
513
503
503
503 •
503
533
503
A T I 0 N
PROCESS
9CI
901
9B5
901
90 1
901
9C5
901
9Ct
90S
3fi t
rff!l
9C 1
"01
915
9C1
701
9O1
901
505
925
93 ft
n?fc
VH.J
i^ft
y4±>
94 <,
^46
V4i
•in i
901
901
901
901
Ml
Qfl 1
901
901
901
901
901
905
905
905
905
905
MS
925
925
925
FILE
SITE BEST.
50*
5P&.
643
50*
5CV6
514.
644
503
50 T
6**i
SOI
507
51Z
S14
434
S03
506
412
514
643
543
^07
M-
(a "' i
^(;3
607
614
SO.'
402
TO*
7C-A
710-
712
713
704
705
708
709
710
711
7|3
704
705
710
711
713
704
705
710
711
264 E
T1*E
0.0
19.90
13.20
19.90
n.o
16. in
16.10
17.70
J.O
17.70
14.90
12. BO
14.70
10.70
3.90
18.30
16.10
8.90
C .(•
15.30
19.30
17.70
1 Q.30
lfl.30
17.70
17.70
H.3C
19.30
17.70
15.00
15.60
15.10
5.10
9.50
14.80
15.60
17. 5P
16.30
11. 0(1
10.40
12.10
11. SO
15.70
14.90
9.20
14.60
11.80
15.70
14.90
9.20
N T R I f
DISTANCE
a.o
14.90
9.9O
14.90
0.0
U.10
12. in
13.30
n.o
13.30
11. ?0
9.60
11.00
a.ao
6. TO
13. 7C
12.10
6.7P
C.lJ
13.70
13.70
13.30
13.70
13.70
13.30
13.30
13.70
13.70
13.30
11.30
11. 7W
11.30
3.86
7.10
11.10
11.70
U.20
12. zn
B.20
7.80
9.10
a. 90
11.80
11.20
6.90
11. CO
8.90
11.80
11.20
6.90
S
SPEED
45.0
45. O
45.0
4S.O
45. O
45. O
45. 0
45.0
45. O
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. P
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. P
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. O
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45. O
45.0
45. C
45.0
45.0
45.0
4S.O
45.0
45.0
45.0
242
-------
CROW-FLY 2
T *
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAMS
TRANS
TRA.NS
TRANS
TRA\S
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAMS
TRANS
TRAVS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAMS
TRANS
TRA\S
TRAMS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRAM3
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TR*NS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
TRANS
Test
A N S
CODE '
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4-
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
<5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
PORT
ORIGIN
503
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
506
506
5^6
506
506
5n6
507
507
507
5^7
507
557
507
507
510
MO
510
510
510
510
510
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
503
503
507
51?
614
514
633
634
637
643
644
647
Table XLII
* T I 0 N FILE
PROCESS SITE 06ST.
Page 5 of 5
925
901
901
9C1
901
905
905
9D5
905
901
901
905
905
905
901
101
901
901
905
905
905
905
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
901
905
905
9C5
905
90S
905
925
925
925
925
925
925
905
925
905
9t5
905
925
936
936
93s
•J4S
946
946
713
704
705
706
713
70-V
705
706
713
705
7Cs>
713
7C5
7C6
71?
70H
7C9
710
711
709
710
711
705
7ns
709
710
711
712
713
705
706
709
710
712
713
705
706
709
710
712
713
705
706
709
710
712
713
643
643
447
712
644
644
603
614
503
614
607
260 E
TIME
14.60
2.20
11.10
19.90
18.10
2.20
11.10
19.90
13.10
10.90
O.C
16.70
10.90
G.O
16.70
2.90
8.20
12.80
14.80
2.90
6.20
12. 8C
14. 80
18.50
15.50
8.20
0.0
19.10
14.70
9.50
11.40
16. 1C
16.40
10. 70
8.9C
3.70
11.40
16.10
13.40
in. 70
8.90
3.70
11.40
16.10
IS. 40
10.70
8.90
3.70
-0.10
-0.10
-0.1C
-0.10
-0.1C
-C.1C
-0.10
-0.10
-0.10
-0.10
-0.1P
-n.ic
N T R I E
DISTANCE
11.00
1.70
8.30
14.90
13.60
1.70
8.30
14.90
13.60
8.20
0.0
12.60
8.20
C.O
12.60
2.20
6. 20
9.60
11.10
2.20
o.?0
9.60
11.10
13.90
11.60
6.10
0.0
14.30
11. CC
7.20
8.60
12.10
13.80
8.00
6.70
2.80
8.60
12. 1C
13.80
8.00
6.70
2.8P
8.60
12.10
13.80
a. oo
6.70
2.80
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.c
0.0
o.c
c.c
0.0
0.0
r.c
s
SPEED
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
C.C
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
243
1101693
SW-164c
------- |