CD A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Industrial Environmental Research      EPA-600/7-77-1 31
Ci /\ Office of Research and Development  Laboratory                       «/*^-»%
                      Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 November 1977
             USE OF ELECTROSTATICALLY
             CHARGED FOG FOR CONTROL OF
             FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS
             Interagency
             Energy-Environment
             Research and Development
             Program Report

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development. U S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was  consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental Health  Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports

This report has  been assigned  to the  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
NOLOGY series. This series describes  research  performed to develop and dem-
onstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent en-
vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This work
provides the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield. Virginia 22161.

-------
                                     EPA-600/7-77-131
                                       November 1977
   USE OF ELECTROSTATICALLY
CHARGED FOG FOR CONTROL  OF
     FUGITIVE  DUST EMISSIONS
                       by

                    Stuart A. Hoenig

                   University of Arizona
                Department of Electrical Engineering
                   Tucson, Arizona 85721
                   Grant No. R805228
                 Program Element No. EHE623
               EPA Project Officer: Dennis C. Drehmel

              Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
               Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
                Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
                     Prepared for

              U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                Office of Research and Development
                   Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
THE  USE OF ELECTROSTATICALLY  CHARGED  FOG FOR CONTROL
                OF DUST  FROM OPEN SOURCES
                 First  Quarterly  Report

                       For the Period

                1 June 1977 - 31 August 1977
                            For

               ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                   Research Triangle Park
                    North Carolina 27711

                    Grant No. R805228010
                      Stuart A. Hoenig

                   Principal Investigator
                    University of Arizona
                       Tucson, Arizona

-------
   UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA EXPERIENCE IN  THE CONTROL  OF DUST,
          FUME AND SMOKE BY  MEANS  OF ELECTROSTATICALLY
                          CHARGED WATER FOG
                                  by
                       Stuart A. Hoenig, Professor
                  Department of Electrical Engineering
                        The University of Arizona
                          Tucson, Arizona 85721
Acknowledgements:

        Many organizations and individuals contributed to this work;
University of Arizona laboratory personnel included Mr. Werner V.
Alchenberger, Mr.  Joseph B. Bidwell, Mr. and Mrs. Douglas K.  Darlington,
Dr. Charles F. Russ,  Mr. Christian W. Savitz, Mr. Steven W.  Schroder and
Mr. Carl R. Tornquist.  Federal agencies, corporations and industrial
organizations included the American Foundrymen's Society, the Ransburg
Corporation, the ARO  Corporation, the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.
        Notice:   Much  of  the data given in this paper was reported at
the 1976-1977 meetings of the American Industrial Hygiene Association.
More recent results  have  been added as the data became available.

-------
Disclaimer Statement





        This report has been reviewed by Dr. Stuart A. Hoenig, and the




Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA), and has been approved for publica-




tion.  Approval does not signify the views and policies of the Environ-




mental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial




products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                       Page
      LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS	     v
      SUMMARY	viii
      CONCLUSIONS	    ix
      RECOMMENDATIONS	 .     x
  I.  INTRODUCTION	     1
 II.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES  	     2
      A.  Generation of Charged Fog	     4
      B.  Dust Tunnel Studies	     6
      C.  Effects of Reduced Water Flow and Chemical Additives  ...     9
      D.  Studies of Coal Particulates and Coal Tar Volatiles ....    11
      E.  Control of Dust From Hand Grinders/ Chippers and Sanders  .    15
III.  INDUSTRIAL TESTING  	    16
      A.  Cement Plant "A"	    17
      B.  Copper Company "A"	    17
      C.  Steel Casting Company "A"	    18
      D.  Steel Company "B"	    19
 IV.  HUMIDITY INCREASE DUE TO FOGGING	    19
      REFERENCES	    22
                                    iv

-------
List of 11 lustrations






 1.  Dust Generator and Impaction Sampler




 2.  Dust Tunnel System




 3.  Modified Impaction Sampler




 4.  Charge versus Particle Size (slate)




 5.  Charge versus Particle Size (granite)




 6.  Charge versus Particle Size (clay)




 7.  Charge versus Particle Size (trap rock)




 8.  Charge versus Particle Size (magnetite)




 9.  Charge versus Particle Size (foundry dust)




10.  Charge versus Particle Size (shale)




11.  Charge versus Particle Size (fly ash)




12.  Charge versus Particle Size (copper concentrate)




13.  Charge versus Particle Size (cement quarry material)




14.  Charge versus Particle Size (cement clinker)




15.  Charge versus Particle Size (silica sand)




16.  Charge Decay versus Time and Particle Size  (silica sand)




17.  Dust Density versus Size, with and without Fogging  (foundry dust)




18.  Dust Density versus Size, with and without Fogging  (foundry dust)




19.  Dust Density versus size, with and without Fogging  (foundry dust)




20.  Dust Density versus Size, with and without Fogging  (silica sand)




21.  Dust Density versus Size, with and without Fogging  (silica flour)




22.  Dust Density with and without Fogging  (magnesium oxide)




23.  Dust Density versus Size, with and without Fogging  (silicon carbide)

-------
                                                                       VI

 24.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging (nickel mine
      precipitator dust)

 25.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (bauxite ore)

 26.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (iron oxide, dolomite,
      cement clinker and calcium oxide)

 27.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (sulfur)

 28.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (Pb 0 )

 29.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (rock salt)

 30.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (burning Carbamite)

 31.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging (silicate copper
      ore)

 32.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging (grey lead/red
      lead mixture)

 33.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging ttrona orel

 34.   Dust Reduction with Various Water Flow Rates (foundry dust)

.35.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging (iron ore
      crusher dust)

 36.   Dust Density with and without Fogging (coking coal)

 37.   Coal Tar Volatile Particulate Density versus Size with and without
      Fogging (coking coal)

 38.   Effect of Charged Fog on Coke Oven Vapors

 39.   Sulfur Dioxide Level with and without Charged Fog

 40.   Experimental Apparatus for High Temperature S0_/Fly Ash Studies

 41.   Sulfur Dioxide Level with and without Charged Fog (381 C)

 42.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging (power plant
      fly ash)

 43.   Dust Density versus Size,  with and without Fogging (power plant
      fly ash at 200 C)

-------
                                                                   vii

44.  Dust and SO  Density versus Size, with and without Fogging (power
     plant fly ash)

45.  Dust and SO? Density versus Size, with and without Fogging (power
     plant fly ash)

46.  Dust Density and SO  Level with and without Fogging (340 C)

47.  Fly Ash, SO_ Agglomerates with and without Charged Fog

48.  Dust Control on a Hand Grinder

49.  Dust Control on a Hand Held Chipper

50.  Test Set-up Cement Plant "A"

51.  Test Set-up Cement Plant "A"

52.  Dust Density versus Particle Size, with and without Fogging
     (Cement Plant "A")

53.  Dust Density versus Particle Size, with and without Fogging
     (Cement Plant "A")

54.  Test Set-up at Copper Company "A"

55.  Dust Density with and without Charged Fog (Copper Company "A")

56.  Test Set-up and Results  (drop box, Copper Company "A")

57.  Test Set-up Steel Casting Company "A"

58.  Effect of Charged Fog on Total Respirable Dust and Free Silica

59.  Dust Density with and without Charged Fog (Cream-Tex)

-------
Summary





        We have demonstrated that most industrial pollutants acquire an




electrostatic charge as they are dispersed into the air.  If this charged,




airborne material, is exposed to an oppositely charged water fog there is




enhanced contact between the particulates and the fog droplets.  After




contact is made the wetted particulates agglomerate rapidly and fall out




of the atmosphere.




        This technique has been tested on a wide variety of industrial




pollutants ranging from silica flour to sulfur dioxide and fly ash.  In



general, there has been significant suppression with a minimum of water




fog.  The system is therefore suited to control of moving or fugitive




dust sources where the usual duct and baghouse systems are too costly or




ineffective.
                                    Vlll

-------
Conclusions





        We suggest that charged fog has a significant potential for




suppression of dust from open sources.  This technique would be most




suitable for control of fugitive dust that cannot be easily contained




or captured by hoods.




        The data further suggests that charged fog might be used ahead




of an electrostatic precipitator, scrubber or bag filter to agglomerate




fine particles and increase the efficiency of the dust control system.




        Other studies have indicated that charged fog can be used to




suppress fumes, i.e., SO  by inducing them to absorb on ambient dust




particles.  If this can be further substantiated it may proved an




important weapon in the battle to clean up the environment.
                                    IX

-------
Recommenda t i ons





        We suggest that the present research program on the use of




charged fog to suppress respirable dust be continued and expanded to a




wider range of applications.  Topics of particular interest might




include:




    1.  Development of dust control systems for moving sources, i.e.,




        lift trucks and in-plant vehicles;




    2.  Control systems for open field stackers which are impossible




        to hood and result in significant dust fallout;




    3.  Coke oven facilities that are significant polluters and very




        difficult to control by conventional means;




    4.  Smelters and power plants which produce both dust and SCL.




        Here we would expect to induce the SO  to absorb on the dust



        before agglomeration occurs.  Subsequent dust fallout or



        collection would remove both pollutants.

-------
I.   Introduction





        Beginning in 1973 a number of studies were done at the University




of Arizona to determine if electrostatic charging was a factor in the




levitation of dust on Mars.  No Mars dust samples were available and




tests were run on a variety of industrial, and naturally occurring,




particulate materials.  The results indicated that in the great major-




ity of cases the respirable materials (below eight micrometers in dia-




meter) were charged and that the finer (one micrometer) particles were




almost always charged negatively.




        These results suggested that it might be possible to suppress




industrial pollutants by exposing them to an oppositely charged water




fog.  The electrostatic effect would encourage fog-dust contact and




the wetted particulates would be expected to agglomerate and fall out.




There were several potential advantages to a system of this type.




    1.  The quantity of water involved would be very low thereby




        conserving water resources in the arid southwest.  Limited




        water use would permit the application of fog on water




        sensitive materials, i.e., flour, cement, etc.




    2.  A system of this type would be suitable for control of




        moving dust sources, i.e., trucks, sweepers, front loaders,




        where conventional methods could not possibly be used.




    3.  Water fog agglomeration might be used to enhance the opera-




        tion of electrostatic precipitators which are known to have




        reduced efficiency for fine  (one micrometer) particulates.

-------
        If the particulates could be agglomerated ahead of the pre-

        cipitator the system effectiveness would be greatly increased.

    4.  Many aerosols, i.e., SO,, NO , NH  are water soluble and
                               fc    X    j
        would be expected to interact with charged water fog.  The

        droplets might absorb on ambient dust particles (that are in

        the process of agglomerating) thereby removing both the dust

        and the aerosol at the same time.  Another mechanism might

        involve direct fog induced agglomeration of the smoke or

        aerosol.  Once again the large drops would be expected to fall

        out quite rapidly.


11.   Experimental Studies

        The first investigation was aimed at a determination of the

charge vs. size spectrum for typical industrial dusts, after grinding

and dispersion into the air.  The test materials, obtained from a

variety of sources, were ground and dispersed by means of the arrastra

mill shown in Figure 1.  The powdered material was blown into a small

dust tunnel, sampled and analyzed by a modified Anderson-2000 Company

Impaction Sampler* (shown in Figure 3).  Typical results in terms of

charge** vs. particle size are shown in Figures 4 through 15; i.e.,
   *The sampler flow rate was 28.2 1/min., a sample run required some
nine minutes.
  **we recognised that it would be advantageous to have the charge data
in "absolute rather than relative units.  However, a study of the litera-
ture, i.e., Loeb Ref 2ab and some laboratory tests indicated that the
process would be difficult, time consuming and subject to severe error.
In any case the important fact was that the dust was charged and that the
respiratory material was predominately negative in sign.  Constraints of
time and funding precluded any further effort to measure absolute charge
for the industrial materials of interest.

-------
                                                                       3




4 slate, 5 granite, 6 clay, 7 trap rock, 8 magnetite, 9 foundry dust,




10 shale, 11 fly ash, 12 copper concentrate, 13 cement quarry material,




14 cement clinker, and 15 silica sand.  In view of the toxicity of




silica dust, it was of interest to observe the decay of the silica




charge as a function of time and particle size.  The data is shown in




Figure 16.  It is apparent that the smallest respiratory material is




most highly charged and decays quite slowly.  This may be connected




with the pathogenic effect of silica.  Experimental studies of this




question were reported in Reference 1.




        The data of Figures 4 through 15 indicates that the respira-




tory-size material was always charged and that generally the charge




was negative in sign.  There have been a number of studies on the




question of how and why dust charging occurs, i.e., Loeb (2a,b),




Harper  (3), Gallo and Lama (4).  There is no general agreement but we




prefer the theory of Gallo and Lama that predicts a negative charge




on the smaller dust particles.  In this connection it is important to




note the effect of impurities as discussed by Loeb.  His book indicates




that when pure quartz is ground there are as many positive as negative




particles, at every size level.  When the quartz was contaminated with




a metal  (platinum) a predominance of negative charge was observed  (2a,




b).  In this connection it is important to note that small dust particles




are frequently contaminated with absorbed metals from vapors generated




during combustion or melting  (5).  An effect of this type may be re-




sponsible for the results of Figures 4 through 15.

-------
        In any case, the above data suggests that under normal con-

ditions respiratory dust will not agglomerate and fall out, because

the uniformity of charge will reduce the number of particle collisions.

Since most particles are negative and the earth's surface normally

carries a negative charge  (6), it appears that electrostatic levitation

would further reduce the rate at which such particles fall out of the

atmosphere.

        Many attempts have been made to encourage dust agglomeration

by wetting down the dust; however, the difficulties of generating a

micron sized fog and inducing the fog to make contact with the dust

particles has almost precluded the use of fogging to control open air

dust problems.  (Some closed dust control systems use electrostatic

techniques to charge the dust.  The charged particles are then sprayed

with oppositely charged water which is effective in making contact with

the dust.  This method requires a closed vessel and the dust must be

properly charged by induction or ion diffusion.  The resultant system

is complex and only suited for dust that has been captured by hoods

and collectors (7)).


    A.  Generation of Charged Fog


        We have made use of a modified commercial* electrostatic paint

spray gun plus a University of Arizona designed apparatus** for genera-

tion of highly dispersed, micron sized, fog that carries a positive or
  *Provided by the Ransburg Corporation of Indianapolis, Indiana.

 **A commercial version of this system is marketed by the Ransburg
Corporation.

-------
negative charge, as desired.  No clogging or deposits have been observed




after many hours of operation, with ion treated tap water.




        Information on the droplet spectrum, generated by the fogging




system, was not available from the manufacturer of the spray nozzles.*




An evaluation of the droplet spectrum was done by collecting the drops




on a microscope slide coated with MgO and measuring the spot diameters




with a reticule in the microscope  (8).  There was a significant decrease




in drop size with the charging voltage "on".  We suggest this was due




to electrostatically induced fracture of water droplets (9).  The micro-




scope data indicated that more than seventy five per cent of droplets




were less than fifty micrometers in diameter.




        Another experiment, designed to measure the electrostatic charge




per droplet, made use of a fog gun and an electrically isolated metal




dewar cooled by a mixture of dry ice and acetone.  The fog condensed on




the walls of the dewar and the resultant electrical current was measured




by a picoammeter driving a chart recorder.  Integration of the current




versus time yielded the total charge delivered to the dewar.  The dewar




was weighed at the beginning and end of the experiment to determine the




total quantity of fog condensed.  Assuming that the average droplet size




was some twenty five microns, the average number of elementary charges




per droplet was found to be 8«10 .  This may be compared with the cal-




culated data of reference 10 which indicates a maximum charge of some




6.5-10^ eiementary charges for this size droplet.
   *Spraying Systems Company, Wheaton, Illinois

-------
        We might note here that droplet charging was by induction and




as the density of the spray cone increases there is a tendency for




charging to be limited to the outside of the cone.  Direct contact




charging is more efficient but may lead to problems of electrical leak-




age back through the water line to the tank.  This leakage may be limit-




ed by using long plastic tubes, of small diameter, to provide a high




resistance path.  We have found it more effective to deliver a mixture




of air and water rather than a solid column of water to the nozzle.




The air bubbles effectively block the electrical leakage  (as long as




plastic tubing is used) and we have found it possible to isolate volt-




ages up to 20 kV by this technique.







    B.  Dust Tunnel  Studies




        The interaction between industrial dusts and charged fog was




investigated in the dust tunnel shown in Figure 2.  The charged fog




and the dust were blown in at one end of the tunnel, and an industrial




vacuum cleaner was used to extract the remaining dust at the other end.




The Anderson Sampler was connected some two feet from the downstream




end of the tunnel.  Several attempts were made to measure the airflow




in the tunnel so that sampling could be done isokinetically.  Unfor-




tunately the flow velocity in the tunnel varied from day to day as the




vacuum cleaner bag loaded up so it was not practical to choose a fixed




velocity for isokinetic sampling.  The variations during a given run




were not large enough to affect the data and the primary interest was




in comparing the dust density with and without charged fog.

-------
                                                                       7
        Typical results with this system, using foundry dust, are
shown in Figure 17; without the fog, the dust level was quite high.
There was some decrease in the dust level with uncharged fog, but
with positively charged fog the decrease was dramatic.   (The choice
of positively charged fog was made on the basis of Figure 9 that in-
dicated the respirable material was (-) in sign.)
        Other data of this type, on foundry dust, is shown in Figures
17, 18 and 19.  In Figures 17 and 18, the water flow to the gun was
held constant, but the time of grinding was varied in order to change
the dust particle spectrum.
        In Figure 18, the emphasis was on the 0.5 to 4 micron respira-
tory range, while in Figure 19 the dust was ground still further to
build up the one micron fraction.  In both cases, the charged fog was
very effective in controlling the dust.  This is especially evident in
Figure 19 at the one micron level.  These results might have been an-
ticipated from Figure 9 where it was shown that the one micron sized
foundry dust had a negative charge.  We would expect this dust to inter-
act quite strongly with oppositely charged fog.  Figures 17, 18 and 19
indicate that this interaction did, in fact, occur.
        Other studies of this type were done with silica sand and silica
flour to determine if similar results could be obtained.  The data is
shown in Figures 20 and 21.  It seems quite clear that the charged fog
system is effective in reducing these particulates.

-------
                                                                       8

        Further data on magnesium oxide dust is shown in Figure 22*.

Here the interest was in the rate of reduction of dust density after

fogging began and for this reason data was taken as a function of time.

It is apparent that there was a substantial reduction after 0.5 minutes,

when charged fog was used.  In contrast, we note that the effect of un-

charged fog was only really apparent after some two minutes.  This dif-

ference is a measure of the effect of charging as a mechanism for im-

proving the contact between dust and water fog.

        Other data showing the effect of charged fog on silicon carbide

dust and nickel mine precipitator dust are shown in Figures 23 and 24.

Data on bauxite ore, calcium oxide, dolomite, cement clinker, iron oxide,

sulfur and Pb 0  are shown in Figures 25, 26, 27 and 28.  Here again
             3 4
charged fog was effective in suppressing all of these dusts, provided

that the proper polarity was used.  Similar results were obtained with

rock salt, the fumes from burning Carbamite  (an ammonium nitrate com-

pound used for underground blasting), a silicate ore sample provided

by a local mine, and a mixture of lead oxides from a battery production

facility, Figures 29, 30, 31 and 32.
   *Some of this data was obtained with a GCA Corporation RD-101 Dust
Monitor.  This unit makes use of a beta ray absorption system and in
some cases, where there was significant absorption of fog by the dust,
it appeared that the dust plus uncharged fog density was higher than
the initial dust density itself.  The data was corrected for this water
absorption, as shown in the figures, by subtracting a percentage from
each vertical bar.  This value was obtained by taking the difference
between the no-fog and the uncharged fog data, dividing by the height
of the uncharged fog bar and multiplying the other data bars by this
value.

-------
                                                                      9



        In all of the above cases there was a significant difference




between the effects of positive versus negatively charged water fog.




This would be expected from the earlier discussion of dust charging.




However, we have noted some cases in which the charge of the fog does




not have a significant effect on the suppression of respirable dust.




Typical examples are shown in Figures 32 and 33 for an industrial red




lead and trona dust Na.CO_•NaHCO.•2H.O from a commercial mine.  We sus-




pect that these samples contain materials that charge both positively




and negatively (a mixture of red lead and sulfur would display this




characteristic).   Little coagulation occurs when the materials are




very dry, if charged fog is used one of the components is wetted and




agglomeration of both species occurs.  This is speculation at present




and the phenomena will be the subject of further investigation.






    C.  Effects of Reduced Water Flow and Chemical Additives





        Another aspect of the study was aimed at evaluating the effects




of reduced water flow on dust control.  Typical results are shown in




Figure 32, where we have plotted the percent reduction of respirable




foundry dust with uncharged (30 ml/min) and with charged water at flow




rates of 30, 16 and 3.2 ml per minute.  The largest reduction was ob-




served with charged fog at 30 ml/min, but the significant reduction




was observed even at 3.2 ml/min.  This suggests that only a limited




amount of fog will be required for effective dust control.  A calcu-




lation of the effect of these fog levels on the humidity, in a typical




foundry, is given at the end of the paper.

-------
                                                                     10




        There have been suggestions that various dust control chemicals,




detergents, etc., be added to the water in order to improve the dust




control system or make the agglomerates more stable.  We have resisted




this idea on the basis that no dust control chemicals have FDA approval




for human exposure.  Anyone working in the area where the charged fog




was used could certainly be exposed to the vapors and the effects of




dust control chemicals have simply not been evaluated in this mode.  We




have done studies with various mixtures of glycerine (glycerol) and




water in cases where the fogging technique might be used at low tempera-




tures.  (Subfreezing temperatures are frequently encountered in the




iron mines of Minnesota and Ontario.)  Glycerine has FDA- approval for




oral, dermal and rectal application and a 50/50 mixture with water has




a freezing point of -23 C.




        Typical glycerine/water data with iron mine crusher dust is




shown in Figure 35.  Here the dust was run first with (+) and  (-)




charged water and then the experiment was repeated with a 50/50 glycer-




ine water mixture.  In both cases the (+) charged fog was most effective




with a slight bias in favor of the pure water rather than the water




glycerine mixture though the difference was not very significant.




        We suggest that mixtures of glycerine and water can be used for




dust suppression and may be especially valuable under freezing conditions




or when there is a tendency for the dust to redisperse.   In the case of




certain lead dusts, the glycerine seems to hold the agglomerate together




even in weak 10/90 glycerine/water solutions.

-------
                                                                      11




    D.  Studies of Coal Particulates and Coal Tar Volatiles





        The increased burning of coal raises the hazard of greater




public exposure to fly ash, coal particulates and the volatiles gener-




ated when coal is heated.  An investigation of the effect of charged




fog on these pollutants involved first the grinding of coal*, in a




nitrogen atmosphere to preclude explosions, to obtain a fine powder.




This powder was blown into the dust tunnel with nitrogen (in place




of air) and fogged.  Typical results are shown in Figure 36.  As usual




the respirable material was found to be negative and was effectively




suppressed by positively charged fog.




        To investigate coal tar volatiles, a metal pipe some 100 mm in




diameter was cut off and sealed with screw caps to form a closed tube




some 300 mm long.  The tube was filled with coarsely ground coal*, pro-




vided with a 10 mm tube to permit vapors to escape and heated to 700 C




in a small oven.  The vapors were blown into an outside dust tunnel and




exposed to charged fog.  Two experiments were done.  One was to observe




volatile particulates that were usually collected on filters.  The other




experiment was aimed at observing benzene solubles.  The data on volatile




particulates is shown in Figure 37.  The  (+) charged fog was most effective




in reducing this pollutant.




        Measurement of these benzene soluble vapors involved drawing




the fumes through a bubbler containing a benzene solution for absorption;




the benzene was then analysed by a gas chromatograph (GC).  A typical
   *Pittsburg Seam #8 Coking Coal  (Ohio)

-------
                                                                      12


test involved first making a GC run with benzene alone, then a run was


made with benzene after absorption of coal tar volatiles, and a last


run was made with benzene and coal tar volatiles where the volatiles


were fogged, with (+) fog, before reaching the benzene absorbent.


        Typical results are shown in Figure 38.  In the presence of


charged fog there was a marked reduction in pickup of benzene solubles


by the bubbler suggesting that this material had been induced to ag-


glomerate and fallout in the tunnel before reaching the collecting device.


We suggest that there may well be applications for charged fog in the


control of coal dust and coal tar volatiles.


        Experiments with SO  and Fly Ash Plus SO .  Sulfur dioxide is
                           2                    2

found as a purely gaseous pollutant in certain copper smelting operations


but in most cases is associated with substantial quantities of dust or


particulate matter.   This is especially the case in coal fired power


plants where control of fine (one micrometer) fly ash and S0_ is dif-


ficult with conventional precipitators, wet scrubbers and bag houses.


        Our first studies, of S0_ alone, were designed to observe the


interaction, if any, between charged fog and S0_.  There had been some


indication that SO- aerosols were negatively charged and to investigate


this, S0_ was provided from burning sulfur or commercial tank, and ex-


posed to charged water fog.  Typical results, at room temperature, are


shown in Figure 39.   Experimental data obtained in the heated test rig


of Figure 40 produced the data shown in Figure 41.  There seems to be


no question that (+) charged fog is effective in reducing the level of

-------
                                                                      13




SO  even at 381 C.  We suggest that the fog combines with the SO  to




form large drops of H SQ. whose vapor pressure is low enough to preclude




evaporation even at the test temperatures.




        The experiments with fly ash began with "pure" fly ash  (without




added SO ).   Typical results are shown in Figure 42.  The (-) charged fog




seemed to be most effective in this case, but this result may be limited




to the particular fly ash involved or to the fact that the test was run




at ambient temperature.  After consultation with the power company




involved, the study was repeated with the fly ash at 200 C.   Once again




charged fog was effective in suppressing the dust (typical results are




shown in Figure 43), but several experiments indicated that now the  (+)




charged fog was most effective.  We have no explanation for this at the




moment.  The question of charging as a function of external parameters,




i.e., heating, is under investigation at the moment.




        At this point, we began experiments with mixtures of SO  and




fly ash.  There have been many reports (Reference 11, pages 105-189)




of improvements in collection and adhension characteristics of fly ash




in the presence of SO. or NH .  In fact,  most commercial fly ash addi-




tives contain one or both of these chemicals.  It is worth noting that




the exact mode in which these chemicals serve to improve collection is




by no means clear and one objective of our experiment was to clarify the




SO  fly ash interaction.




        The first studies involved grinding the fly ash in the arrastra




mill and blowing, it into the dust tunnel while at the same time adding




a measured flow of SO  .  The sulfur dioxide studies were hampered by a

-------
                                                                      14




a lack of detection apparatus but the experiment served to define




possible applications of the charged fog technique.  Typical results




at ambient temperature are shown in Figure 44.  The addition of SO




raised the measured dust level appreciably.  We associate this with




absorption of SO  onto the dust thereby raising the weight of the




particles.  With (+) charged fog there was a significant reduction in




the dust level.  If SO. was not present the dust reduction was even




greater suggesting that in the presence of SO. some of the injected fog




is taken up by the gas and therefore unavailable to the dust.  In an




industrial situation this could be remedied by simply increasing the




quantity of charged fog.




        For the next experiment we were able to make some numerical




determinations of SO  level, by a wet chemical technique, and typical




results for dust and SO  are shown in Figure 45.  Here the initial




dust density is shown with an added SO. content equivalent to 13.2 mg/m .




After fogging the dust level fell to the lower curve and the S0_ level




fell below the sensitivity of our instrument 0.26 mg/nr.




        The next set of studies made use of the experimental system




shown in Figure 40.  Here the interest was to determine the effects,




if any, of the high temperature on the reaction.  Typical results are




shown in Figure 46.  There was a significant reduction in dust density




and a moderate reduction in the SO  level.  The limited effect of the




fog on the SO_ may be due to the use of a different and much more acid




fly ash, from a local mine.  This ash may have captured a majority of




the fog so rapidly that little was left to absorb SO .  These effects




will be investigated in more detail as the program developes.

-------
                                                                     15




        These SO /fly ash investigations are obviously in the very




beginning stages, equipment is still being ordered and set up.  Never-




theless, there is every indication that when a mixture of SO  and fly




ash is exposed to charged fog the fog divides between the SO  and the




fly ash.  Fog absorbed by the fly ash is tightly held and induces dust




agglomeration; the fog that interacts with the SO  forms dilute sulfuric




acid that is absorbed by the dust particles to produce a highly adhesive




agglomerate.  Two photographs are shown in Figure 47; the upper shows the




agglomerate formed with SO  plus fly ash, the lower shows the effect of




adding charged fog.  Not only are the agglomerates somewhat larger but




there are whiskers which we suspect are sulfur since they could not be




imaged in the scanning electron microscope.




        These absorption and agglomeration effects suggest that it




might be possible to remove both pollutants (SO  and fly ash) at the




same time by spraying with charged fog.  The resultant agglomerates are




large (typically thirty micromenters) and ideally suited to collection




by precipitators or wet scrubbers.  This combination of effects could




significantly improve the control systems installed on a wide variety




of power plants and smelters.






    E.  Control of Dust From Hand Grinders, Chippers and Sanders




        These tools are a source of dust and since they are often used




in confined areas, where hoods would interfere with the work, they are




a potential factor in workman injury.  Some companies have marketed




collectors and vacuum manifolds to go on the grinder but in general

-------
                                                                     16

these units have not been popular because they change the balance of

the tool and interfere with the workman's view.

        We have developed* a system for adding small quantities of

water fog to the contact area between the tool and the work.  This

effectively reduces the respirable dust level while at the same time

acting as a cooling agent.  Typical results with a grinder and chipper

are shown in Figures 48 and 49.  In each case there was a significant

reduction in dust level and operator comments indicated that grinding

seemed more efficient.  The water dispensing and controlling system

did not interfere with the operation of the tool.

        Arrangements are being made with a manufacturer of hand tools

to bring this device into the commercial market.  Further development

of systems to reduce dust during wire brushing, swing grinding and

electric arc washing are under way.


III.  Industrial Testing

        The laboratory work, while encouraging, was not a guarantee

that the system would operate in the more rigorous environment of the

industrial plant.  For this reason, a test program was organized at

several locations in southern Arizona and at a number of other industries

in various parts of the United States and Canada.  For some tests the

University participated directly in the setup and operation of the exper-

iment.  In other cases the fog guns were simply loaned or rented to the
        *This device is the subject of a patent disclosure to the
Ransburg Corporation of Indianapolis, Indiana.

-------
                                                                     17



organization for try out.  This proved to be a problem in some situations




where corporate personnel were not familiar with dust sampling procedures




or how to set up for a test of this kind.  As a result there were some




inconclusive tests and in a few cases negative results were obtained.




This problem is being slowly solved as test equipment is refined and




more time is available for assisting the corporation during the test.




        Some of the results obtained by the author, or by industrial




personnel, under controlled conditions, are discussed below.  At the




present time tests are under way at some fifty industrial locations.






    A.  Cement Plant "A"





        A sample was taken from the belt conveyor in the quarry surge




building.  The dust was tested in the system, shown in Figure 2 and




the results are shown in Figure 13.  It is clear that this dust was




primarily negative in sign, and positively charged fog should be used.




The in-plant fog tests made use of two modified Ransburg REA guns,




mounted as shown in Figures 50 and 51.  The curtains shown in Figure 51




were used to prevent dust from blowing in or out of the test area.  In




the case of Figure 50, we were interested in the dust suppression right




at the hoppers.  In Figure 51, the reduction in dust in the working area




was of importance.  The results are shown in Figures 52 and 53.  In both




cases, there was significant reduction in the dust level.






    B.  Copper Company "A"





        Dust samples were taken from a concentrate conveyor in the




smelter and tested in the dust tunnel of Figure 2.  The charge vs. size

-------
                                                                      18




data was shown in Figure 12.  It is clear that the smaller respirable




material is positive in sign, indicating that negatively charged fog




should be used.




        The experimental set up for this test made use of one Ransburg




REA gun, as shown in Figure 54.  There was some difficulty with high




ambient winds blowing the dust and fog about, but it was possible to take




data by sampling with a GCA RD-101 beta ray adsorption system.  The




results are shown in Figure 55.




        In another test, at the same company, the fog gun was set up at a




conveyor drop box as shown in Figure 56.  Some eleven samples were taken




without fog and seven samples with (+) charged fog.  The average reduction




in dust level was some 65.4%.  This was felt to be satisfactory in view




of the many other dust sources in the area and the high winds that happened




to be blowing that day.






    C.  Steel Casting Company "A"





        The test area for this study was a standard railroad boxcar used




for shipping silica sand.  Under normal conditions, the dust level during




unloading was quite high.  The control system involved four RAnsburg REA




guns fastened to the inside roof of the boxcar as shown in Figure 57.




The dust levels during unloading were monitored by MSA Gravimetric Dust




Samplers for a two hour working period.  The total dust level and the




fraction of free silica were measured with and without charged fog.  The




results are shown in Figure 58.  It is apparent that both the total dust




concentration and the respirable silica level were significantly reduced.

-------
                                                                     19



It is interesting to note that the free silica was reduced by a factor of


1. 09
Q* , g = 57.4, suggesting that the positively charged fog was most effec-



tive on the negatively charged (Figure 15) silica dust.  This very signi-



ficant effect is a measure of the effectiveness of the charged fog tech-



nique.  Further experiments in this facility are planned.




    D.  Steel Company "B"
        One of the more troublesome operations in this facility was the


bag splitting room where operators were exposed to high levels of respi-


rable dust.  This area was set up with two fog guns blowing into the


splitting hood.  Samples were taken at two fixed points in the hood area


and a third sampler was attached to the workman and operated by a battery


driven pump.


        Typical results are shown in Figure 59.  There was a significant


dust reduction at the fixed locations but the greatest improvement was


measured by the sampler on the workman.  This was most encouraging and


further studies in this faciltiy are under way.




IV.  Humidity  Increase Due to Fogging



        This is of some importance in areas where the addition of water


vapor might damage delicate equipment or interfere with industrial


operations.  To evaluate this effect, we consider a fog gun air flow of


some 100 SCFH  (2.8m /Hr) and a water flow of some A ml/min or 2.21  •



10~3 A Ib/min  (1.003 .

-------
                                                                      20



         This air flow will mix with ambient air after it leaves the  gun.



In an open-shop situation, where the supply of ambient air is essentially



unlimited, the mixture ratio will be about 100 giving an effective air


               4           3
flow of some 10  SCFH 283 m /Hr ^toward-the target.  If this  "factory  air"



is 80°F  (26.7.C) at; 50%" RH,' its^-initial moisture content- will be 0.011 lb-



H o per Ib air  (0.011 g H 0/g air).



        The density of air at the above conditions is some 0.079 Ib/SCF



(0.00128 g/m ).  This flow represents some 13.2 Ib/min (6000 g/min) of



air with an initial water vapor content of 0.145 Ib HO  (65.83 g HO).
                                                     fL            £t


        In the flow of water to the fog gun is some 30 ml/min (a rather



large value), the total water added per minute will be some 0.064 Ib  HO



(29.1 g HO).'  If we add this to the initial water vapor level of 0.145



Ib (65.83 g HO) the total is 0.209 Ib HO (94.9 g HO) or 0.0159 Ib



H 0/lb air  (0.0159 g H 0/g air).  The new RH (assuming constant tempera-



ture conditions) is some 70%, insufficient to damage industrial appartus.



        If the water flow is reduced to some 5 ml/min  (0.011 Ib/min), the



fogging technique is still quite effective (Figure 34).  Under these



conditions, the RH rises from an initial 50% RH to some 67% RH  (assuming



constant temperature).



        This calculation has been done for open shop conditions.  In



ducts or tunnels where the flow of ambient air is limited, higher relative



humidity values will be generated.  If this is a problem, it should be



possible to further reduce the water flow, provided that better atomization



of the water can be achieved.  The number of drops obtained from a given


                                                                   4   3
volume of water varies as the third power of the radius, i.e., V = —  TTR  .

-------
                                                                      21





The limiting charge per drop varies as the square of the radius NE ~ AR




(where A is a constant).  Reducing R by a factor of 10 increases the




number of drops by a factor of 1000.  The allowable charge per drop de-




creases by a factor 100, permitting an approximate gain in effectiveness




of a factor of 10.  Conversely, the quantity of water might be reduced by




a factor of 10 without loss of efficiency.




        In the case cited above reduction of water flow from 5 ml to 0.5 ml




per minute reduces the rise in relative humidity from some 17% RH to less




than 1% RH.

-------
                                                                       22

 References
 1.  Summerton,  J. E.,  et al.,  "Silicosis:  1.  The Mechanism of Homolysis
     by Silica," Journal of Molecular Pathology, 26, 113-28, (1977).

 2.a Kunkel, W.  B.,  "The Static Electrification of Dust Particles on
     Dispersion into a Cloud,"  Journal Appl.  Phys., 21, pg. 820, 1950.

   b Loeb, L. B., Static Electrification, Springer, Berlin, 1958.

 3.  Harper, W.  R.,  Contact and Frictional Electrification, Oxford Univ.
     Press, New York, 1967.

 4.  Gallo, C. F., W. L. Lama,  "Classical Electrostatic Description of
     the Work Function and lonization Energy of Insulators," IEEE
     Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 1A-1'2, No. 1,  pg. 7,
     (1976).

 5.  Natusch, D.F.S., et al., "Toxic Trace Elements: Preferential
     Concentration in Respirable Particles," Science, 183, No.  4121,
     pg. 183, 1974.

 6.  Israel, H., Atmospheric Electricity, Vol. !_, 11, U. S. (Department
     of Commerce NTIS,  Springfield, Virginia, 1973.

 7.  "Particle Charging Aids—Wet Scrubbers Sub-Efficiency," Chemical
     Engineering, pg. 74, July 21, 1975.

 8.  May, K. R., "The Measurement of Airborne Droplets by the Magnesium
     Oxide Method,"  J.  Sci. Instr., 27, pg. 128  (1950)

 9.  Doyle, A.,  et al,  "Behavior of Evaporating Electrically Charged
     Droplets,"  Jnl. Coll. Sci., 19_, 136,  (1964)

10.  Davies, C.  N.,  Aerosol Science, pg. 63,  Academic Press, New York,
     1966.

11.  Blake, D. E., PB 260-499,  Symposium on Particulate Control in Energy
     Processes,  Sept. 1976, available from National Technical Information
     Service, Springfield, Va.  22161.

-------
           COMPRESSED
           AIR
           FLOWMETER
                        DRIVE  MOTOR
              A
              m/i/mm/,
ARRASTRA
MILL
                                    I
                               IMPACTION
                               DUST  SAMPLER
DUST  GENERATOR   AND  SAMPLING  SYSTEM

-------
ANDERSON
IMPACTION
SAMPLER
                            JO  VACUUM  CLEANER
                            AND  OUTSIDE  EXHAUST
                                        BLANK -OFF
                                        PLATE
     EXPERIMENTAL '1 PUST  TUNNEL

-------
                AIR  AND
                DUST  INTAKE
                      TYPICAL
                      STAGES
                      3 OF 6

     TREK VOLT
       METER
    ANDERSON - 2000
    IMPACTION  SAMPLER
                           SEQUENTIAL
                             SWITCHING
                               SYSTEM
VACUUM
PUMP
         PERFORATED  PLATE
               \
/
       SILVER
         PAINT
                                                  \

    PLEXIGLAS   2.5mm *
                           SPRING

      PLATE     J            ______

-------
II
   PARTICLE  SIZE
   MICROMETERS
          3 RUNS
          (SLATE)
              W////////////////////////7/M//.
           I	1
                                                INDICATES  SPREAD
                                                    OF THE DATA
        6     5
         H
3     21      01
Q^  (ARBITRARY  UNITS)

-------
II
0
     PARTICLE   SIZE
     MIC ROMETE RS
                                                            3 RUNS
                                                            ( GRANITE )
                                                            INDICATES  SPREAD
                                                               OF THE DATA
                  3            2             I
                    CHARGE   (ARBITRARY  UNITS)

-------
II
   PARTICLE  SjZE
   MICROMETERS
             3 RUNS
             ( CLAY)
      INDICATES  SPREAD
        OF THE DATA
                           w/m///////,
              5    4    32     10
                CHARGE  (ARBITRARY   UNITS)

-------
- PARTICLE SIZE
 MICROMETERS
     3 RUNS
     (TRAP ROCK)
   INDICATES  SPREAD
     OF THE DATA
                       i	1
7//M//MM////I
                                  i
                       3        2        I
                  CHARGE (ARBITRARY  UNITS)

-------
II
   PARTICLE SIZE
   MICROMETERS
3 RUNS
(MAGNETITE  ORE)
                                                       i	1
                                                     INDICATES  SPREAD
                                                        OF THE DATA
               I             2.            3
               CHARGE   (ARBITRARY   UNITS)

-------
II
     PARTICLE   SIZE
     MICROMETERS
                    5  RUNS
               (  FOUNDRY  DUST )
         l	,
       INDICATES  SPREAD
          OF  THE DATA
               W//////////////////////////////M
                    -i
o
                  5432       10
                     CHARGE  (ARBITRARY   UNITS)
I      2      3

-------
II
     PARTICLE   SIZE
     MICROMETERS
                   3  RUNS
                  (SHA LE )
       INDICATES  SPREAD
          OF THE DATA
54
  CHARGE
                               3     a      I      0
                             (  ARBITRARY  UNITS )

-------
   PARTICLE   SIZE
   MICROMETERS
II
10
8
                                         BAR  SHOWS  SPREAD
                                         OF THE  DATA
                             ( 3  RUNS )

                              ELY ASH 5BOM POWER PLANT "A1
                                                         [11
           <-)
                   'ARBITRARY   UNITS)

-------
                    Y//////////////////7///A
 7
   PARTICLE    SIZE
   M I C R 0 f ,1 E T E R S
 6
-5
- 4
-2
- I
        (-)  CHARGE
      10
B_
                               i	1

                                     INDICATES   SPREAD   OF  DATA
                                         DUST FROM CONCENTRATE CONVEYOR
                                            COPPER;COMPANY "A"
                                    (-H  CHARGE   ARBITRARY   UNITS
2
_t_
4

-------
-8
-7
-6
 5
   PARTICLE   SIZE
   MICROMETERS
-4
 3
K/////////////////////I
___ , 	 j
E

//
71
i —
71
 2
-I
        (-)  CHARGE

      5      43
                                                    CEMENT COMPANY "A"
DUST   FROM  QUARRY  SURGE
STORAGE   -CONVEYOR
                                                INDICATES   SPREAD  OF   DATA
              (+)  CHARGE
            345

-------
 6
-7
   PARTICLE   SIZE


   MICROMETERS
 6
- 5
 4
 3
 2
- I
        (-)  CHARGE


       543
                                          '///A
                                                          CEMENT COMPANY "A"
CLINKER   DUST   FROM  BELT  TO

STORAGE  AREA
                                              H    INDICATES   SPREAD  OF  DATA
                   (+)  CHARGE
  i	1
5
 i

-------
                                      W////////////A
PARTICLE  SIZE
MICROMETERS
               5  RUNS
           ( SILICA  SAND)
     INDICATES  SPREAD
        OF THE  DATA

                     W////M////////////////////.
                          i	     i    	I
                                      ABOVE  II
      12
10      8     G     4      20
   CHARGE (ARBITRARY  UNITS)
246

-------
8i
6
4
2
8
  CHARGE   UNITS
   ( ARBITR ARY )
                          PHARYNX
                   SECONDARY
                   BRONCHI
AVERAGE   OF  3  TESTS
RESPIRATORY    PENETRATION

   SILICA DUST


       4.7 - 7.0 u
                                                    0.65-1.1 u
                             &      6      t
                                X ( M I N U T E S )
                  10
II

-------
10
8
   DUST  DENSITY
                                 INITIAL  DUST
                                 DUST  LEVEL
                                 (NO  FOG )
                UNCHARGED
                FOG
              ^CHARGED
                FOG
                  DIAMETER  IN  MICRONS
                                                  8
MATERIAL  (FOUNDRY  DUST)   CONTINUOUS   OPERATION
DUST   AIR  FLOW    50SCFH
FOG   WATER  FLOW   30ml/min   ( 0.475 gal/hr  )
                                                       17

-------
  DUST  DENSITY  mt* /
0
                                   MATERIAL, FOUNDRY  DUST
                                   CONTINUOUS  OPERATION

                                   FOG  WATER  FLOW   30 ml/mfn
                                   FOG  GUN  AIR  FLOW 100 SCFH
                                   DATA  CORRECTED  FOR   WATER
                                   PICK-UP  ON COLLECTION PLATES
INITIAL  DUST '
LEVEL (NO FOG)
                   UNCHARGED
                   FOG
                      (-HCHARGED
                         FOG
                                                         PARTICLE
                                                         DIAMETER
                                                         ( MICRONS)
                                                  Q

-------
12 -
8 -
        DUST  DENSITY  ™Q/m3
                                     MATERIAL   FOUNDRY  DUST
                                     CONTINUOUS  OPERATION

                                     FOG  WATER  FLOW  30ml/m|n
                                     FOG  GUN  AIR%  FLOW  100 SCFH

                                     DATA  CORRECTED  FOR  WATER
                                     PICK-UP  ON  COLLECTION  PLATES
                           CHARGED  FOG
                           INITIAL  DUST  LEVEL (NO  FOG)
                           UNCHARGED  FOG
                                                            PARTICLE
                                                            DIAMETER
                                                            {  MICRONS )

-------
7
DUST  DENSITY
  D mg/  M3
                                        INITIAL  DUST
                                      DENSITY  (TOTAL)
                                    '20.3 mg / M3
                              DENSITY  AFTER  FOGGING
                            WITH  UNCHARGED   FOG  ( TOTAL)
                           10.1  mg /  M3
                         DENSITY  AFTER  FOGGING  WITH  (+)  CHARGED
                         FOG ( TOTAL) 1.5 mg / M3
                                    2.0
                              DIAMETER
                                                 3.0
4.0
                                      ( MICRONS )
 DUST   DENSITY  VS  SIZE BEFORE AND AFJER  FOGGING
 FOG  DENSITY   2.4 ml / M3    (  SILICA  SAND )

-------
   DUST  DENSITY
   mg /
30
20
MATERIAL  - SILICA  FLOUR
DUST   TUNNEL   DATA
3   RUNS
                                WATER   FLOW  30  ml/ min
                                AIR   FLOW   100  SCFH
                         INITIAL   DUST
                         LEVEL
10
      WITH  ( + )  FOG
                                               PARTICLE   SIZE  ( MICRONS )
         0
                 6
8

-------
30 r
                        Mg 0  DUST
                        RESPIRATORY
              FRACTION   ONLY
   mg/
AIR  FLOW  100   SCFH
WATER  FLOW   30 ml / min
25
20
                  UNCHARGED
                  FOG
                                    INITIAL  DUST
                                    LEVEL
10
GCA
BETA
                               RD-IOI
                              DUST  MONITOR
                 +  CHARGED
                 FOG
              START  OF  RUN
                                     TIME  (MIN)

-------
20
18
16
14
12
10
 8
    DUST  DENSITY
    mg /
 0
                        SILICON   CARBIDE   FURNACE  DUST
                        30 %  SIC
                        50 %  Si 02
                        20 %  IRON  OXIDES
                        TEMPERATURE    23°  C (AMBIENT)
                                  INITIAL    DUST   LEVEL
                                  AFTER    SPRAYING   WITH    UNCHARGED   FOG
                    EFFECT   OF   ( + )  CHARGED    FOG
  0.0
2.0
3.0    4.0    5.0    6.0    7.0   8.0
 PARTICLE    SIZE   ( MICRONS)
9.0    10.0

-------
      DUST  DENSITY
      mg /
INITIAL   DUST
LEVEL
MIXED
(  NiO
FROM
                                     PRECIPITATOR   DUST
                                     NIS ,  Ni3 S4 )
                                             FACILITY
                                            /1EN£JO
                                     SUDBURY ,  CANADA
                                      WATER   FLOW  30 ml / MIN.
                              EFFECT   OF  ( +)
                              CHARGED   FOG
PARTICLE   DIAMETER   MICROMETERS
	I  	    g      |       |       |
     I       23      4       5
                                          8
                            10

-------
                      BAUXITE  ORE  FROM  DUVAL   CORP.
20 \-
15 k
10 \-
DUST DENSITY
mg/m3 WATER FLOW 30 ml/min
AIR FLOW 100 SCFH
-
•


-






•





•^M




VERTICAL BARS SHOW
DATA SPREAD
1 ' ' .
DATA TAKEN WITH GCA CORP.
RDM -101 BETA RAY DUST MONITOR
RESPIRABLE DUST ONLY
nl
       NO FOG
(-) FOG
(+) FOG


-------
          MODEL
i M IN t m
RDM-tOI
wn «   fcUA   CORPORATION
  BETA   RAY   DUST   MONITOR
          MATERIALS   PROVIDED   BY   KAISER   STEEL  CO.
          FONTANA   CALIFORNIA
42
38
34
30
26
22
 18
14
10 •
 6 •
 2
1 ) INITIAL
DUST LEVE
2). DUST PLUS UNCHARG
«••
L
E
3) DUST PLUS 30ml/mi]n
4) DUST PLUS 20ml/mjn
5 ) DUST PLUS 30 ml
6 ) DUST PLUS 20 ml
DATA BARS ARE '
DUST DENSITY
mg / m3


CORRECTION FOR
k


•
•
•








—





__



I
y.
\
/



—
I

'/

}



mmmm
12345
CaO
\
\
\
1

^^
;
7
f\
•>


V





njn
niln
E





Jr











D FOG
NEGATIVE FC
NEGATIVE FC


;


•F





iP
P
V
^
/
'/
'f.
/
\
J
>,
\
/
/
/
OSITIVE F(
OSITIVE F<
ERAGE OF


ABSORPT




^^H
7
/
/
'*,

' 3




ON










m
c
x
><











»

RUNS


IN GCA U





^^m

\
/






\



N








r





^M






1


















—


TI,
/
'',
y
/
\
/
\
/
6 123 5 1235 X~N 1 2 3
DOLOMITE CEMENT &*) FeO
                                         CLINKER

-------
2.0
    DUST  DENSITY
    mg  / m3
       SULFUR  SUPPLIED  BY
       DUVAL  SULFUR  COMPANY
 1.5
 1.0
 .5
 .0
                            BARS  SHOW  SCATTER
                            OVER  3   RUNS
       LABORATORY   TEST  DATA
       FOG  WATER  FLOW  30ml/min
       AIR  FLOW  100  SCFH

       6CA  CORP.   RDM-101
       BETA   RAY  DUST  MONITOR
       RESPIRABLE  FRACTION  ONLY
                                           I
     NO FOG
(-) FOG
(+) FOG

-------
   DUST   DENSITY
   mg /
8
                BARS  SHOW  SCATTER
                OVER   3  RUNS
               MATERIAL  RED LEAD
               Pb304
               LABORATORY TEST  DATA
               FOG WATER FLOW 30 ml'/ min
               AIR FLOW 100  SCFH
               GCA  CORP.  RDM 101
               BETA  RAY DUST MONITOR
               RESPIRABLE FRACTION  ONLY
          NO  FOG
(-) FOG
(+) FOG

-------
20
DUST   DENSITY
mg / m^
                          ROCK  SALT FROM  AVERY  ISLAND, LA.

                          DATA   LIMITED  TO RESPIRABLE  DUST
15
10 -
 5 -

WM





-
^•M





1













BARS SHOW SCATTER
OVER 3 RUNS

FOG WATER FLOW 30ml/ min
AIR FLOW 100 SCFH
DATA TAKEN WITH GCA CORP.
RDM -101 BETA RAY
DUST MONITOR
          NO  FOG
                    (-) FOG
(+) FOG
                                                     (21

-------
   DUST
   DENSITY
   mg / m^
FOG -
DUST
   GCA  UNIT
20
15
10
BURNING
CARBAMITE
                                         D  X  10' PIPE
             VERTICAL  BARS  SHOW
             SCATTER  OVER  3 RUNS
           LABORATORY   TEST  RESULTS
           WITH          MINE  DUST
           FUMES  FROM  BURNING
           CARBAMITE   AND  FOG

           RESPIRABLE  DUST  LEVELS
           ONLY   DATA  TAKEN   WITH
           GCA   CORP.   RDM-101
           BETA   RAY  DUST  MONITOR

           FOG  WATER  FLOW 30 ml / min
           AIR  FLOW 100  SCFH
        NO FOG
       (-) FOG
(+)FOG

-------
30
26
22
18
14
10
mg /
DUST   DENSITY
LABORATORY   TEST  RESULTS
CONTROL  OF DUST  WITH  CHARGED  FOO

AIR  FLOW  150   SCFH
FOG  WATER  FLOW  10 ml / min
                                            SILICATE   ORE   SAMPLE
                                            FROM  KCC—RMD
                                            FINE  ORE  TUNNEL
                  INITIAL
                DUST  LEVEL
          PARTICLE    DIAMETER   ( MICROMETERS )
                                                         8
                                                                   10

-------
7 h
6

5
1.0


 7

 6

 5
O.I
   mg/

   MG
   DUST
   DENSITY
LABORATORY   TEST OF  CHARGED FOG  FOG  FOR
DUST  CONTROL

GREY  LEAD  OXIDE /  RED  LEAD  MIXTURE
SPONTANEOUS   CHARGE  (-)

FOG  GUN  AIR  FLOW  150  SCFH

FOG  GUN  WATER  FLOW  35ml/min
                                   DUST  LEVEL  NO FOG
                                   DUST
      VACUUM
      CLEANE.R
61
                    DUST  LEVEL  (4-) FOG
                                ANDERSON  2000
                                SAMPLER        FOG GUN
                   PARTICLE   DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
                                        8

-------
45
39
33
27
21
 15
 0
   DUST  DENSITY
LABORATORY   TESTS  OF  DUST  CONTROL
WITH  CHARGED  FOG  ,  TRONA  DUST  FROM
                                               SAMPLE    2
                                               AIR  FLOW  150 SCFH
                                               WATER   FLOW   15 ml / min
                    INITIAL  DUST  LEVEL
                                UNCHARGED  FOG
           PARTICLE  DIAMETER (MICROMETERS)
  0
                          8
10

-------
%  REDUCTION  IN  OUST  LEVEL  AT

too

90
a/s
BU
\j\j
70


60


50

40

30
20
10
_ VARIOUS WATttt t-LUW KATt.5,
FOUNDRY DUST CONTINUOUS OPERATIC
•



M

m


•
.

»•

lm

mm
mm
mm
I
(J
|
/


X
X
X

^
V
^
A
1
/

^-^

^^>^..^ INITIAL RESPIRATORY DUST
LEVEL ( BELOV/
6p) 26.7 m9/r.i
AFTER FOGGING WITH UN-














|

/
|

•y
^
^
/ y
^

' -ft^. 	 • 	 ^CHARGED FOG
1 ( 21.4 m?/M^ )


30 m/M N

3.2 ml/MIN CHARGED FOG
/^ { 9.14 m9/M3 )
/
16.5 mI/MIN CH
f( 8.38 mVM3 )

\ \ 30 mI/MIN
\ y \ ( 5.22 mV
\ \v y
1 \H
11
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 /
7 7
7 7
7 7
V 7
i i


ARGED FOG


CHARGE'D FOG
M3 ^ *x.
\
1 	 1

-------
          DENSITY
II
6 -
           CRUSHER   DUST
           STEEP   ROCK   IRON  MINE
           ATIKOKAN , ONTARIO  CANADA


AIRFLOW  100 SCFH

FOG   WATER   FLOW  30 ml / min
               DUST  WITH UNCHARGED  FOG

               INITIAL   DUST   LEVEL

               DUST  WITH  (-) CHARGED  FOG
               AND   GLYCERINE  50 % v/v

               DUST  WITH  (-) CHARGED  FOG
                             DUST  WITH (4-) CHARGED  FOG
                             AND  GLYCERINE  50 %  v/v

                             DUST   WITH (4-) CHARGED  FOG
        12345678
                PARTICLE    DIAMETER  (  MICROMETERS )

-------
DUST
DENSITY 1

          5.9
                            BARS   SHOW  SCATTER
                            OVER  3   RUNS
                           PITTSBURGH  SEAM   8
                           COKING   COAL (OHIO)

                           LABORATORY  TEST  DATA
                           FOG  WATER  FLOW  30ml/min
                           AIR  FLOW  100  SCFH
                           GCA  CORP.
                           BETA  RAY
                           RESPIRABLE
                 RDM - 101
                 DUST  MONITOR
                  FRACTION  ONLY
                                           n
                        I
   NO  FOG
(-) FOG
(+) FOG

-------
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
       0
                                        COAL    TAR    VOLATILES

                                        FOG   WATER  FLOW    30 ml / min
                                                   15'
                                                       INITIAL   LEVEL
                      COKE OVEN
                      FUME
                      (-)   CHARGED  FOG
                                                                              10" DIA.
                                                                              PVC   PIPE

                                                                              SAMPLER
                                        AFTER   FOGGING   WITH  UNCHARGED   FOG
                                           )   CHARGED   FOG
                                                                               (371
 2.0     3.0
PARTICLE
 4.0     5.0     6.0     7.0     8.0
DIAMETER  ( MICROMETERS)
90

-------
8
   PEAK  HEIGHT
  " ARBITRARY  UNITS
EFFECT  OF  CHARGED  FOG  ON  COKE
OVEN  VAPORS

  POWDERED   COAL  COKED  AT  700  C.

    FOG   WATER  FLOW  30 ml / min
                       HEWLETT   PACKARD  MODEL  700
                       GAS  CHROMATOGRAPH
                       SILICON   GUM   RUBBER  COLUMN SE-
                          BENZENE  ONLY
                          COAL  TAR   VOLATILES
                          'lN   BENZENE
                          COAL  TAR   VOLATILES
                          /AND  (+) FOG

-------
8
mg
    NO  FOG
                  (-) CHARGED  FOG
                                 BARS  SHOW  SCATTER
                                 FOR  3  RUNS
                                  (+) CHARGED  FOG
S02  LEVEL  WITH   AND  WITHOUT   CHARGED   FOG ,
 FOG  WATER   FLOW   30'ml/min.

-------
                                     ,0V EN
THERMO-
COUPLE
S02 AND  DUST
                        FOG
                        INJECTOR
                        S02 / DUST
                        ABSORPTION
                        SYSTEM
                                     0.028  M3
                                     TEST   CHAMBER


                                     PADDLE  STIRRER
AIR
                                             DUST
SO,
    SULFUR   DIOXIDE   /   DUST  EXPERIMENTAL  SYSTEM

-------
20
18
16
14
12
10
 8
 S02  CONCENTRATION
 PPM  X   I02
[-5.3  g /m3
LABORATORY   TESTS  OF S02  CONTROL BY
MEANS  OF  CHARGED  FOG   0.028  m3  TEST
CHAMBER  AT  700 F°, 381  C°
LIQUID   INJECTION  3 ml  AT  6 KV
                              VERTICAL  BARS
                              SHOW  THE SCATTER
                              OVER  FOUR  RUNS
         INITIAL  S02
         LEVEL
            (+) FOG

                                  (-) FOG

                                                /:
                                                      NO
                                                      CHARGE

-------
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
 8
  'DUST
   LEVEL
POWER   PLANT   FLY   ASH   FROM
4  CORNERS  ,  NEW   MEXICO
           WATER   FLOW
           SOm'/min

           AIR  FLOW
           100  SCFH

           MEAN  OF 3  RUNS
                   DUST   LEVEL
                                            FOG
               CHARGED  FOG
                               » CHARGED  FOG
         I      2      3
            PARTICLE
        4     5
     DIAMETER
    6      7
( MICRONS )

-------
34
    mg
/m3
30
26
22
    DUST
    DENSITY
18
 14
 10
                     INITIAL   DUST  DENSITY
                                               POWER   PLANT   FLY   ASH
                                        FLY   ASH  INJECTED   INTO   DUST
                                        TUNNEL  AT  200 °C  ( 392 °F)
                                        WATER  FLOW   30ml  / MIN.
                 AFTER   SPRAYING  WITH
                 (4-J  CHARGED   FOG
                                                                                [4-3,
          1.0    2.0     3.0
                   PARTICLE
                       4.0     5.0     6.0     7.0     8.0
                          DIAMETER   { MICROMETERS )
9.0

-------
8.0
    DUST
    DENSITY
7.0 -
6.0 -
5.0 -
4.0 -
                   DUST -  MIDWEST   FLY  ASH
                   AIR   FLOW   200   SC F H
                   FOG   WATER   FLOW   30ml / min
 INITIAL   DUST   LEVEL  WITH
 S02  AT  13.1  mg /  m3
                    DUST  LEVEL
    DUST,
    -AND
    CHARG
      0.0
2.0     3.0     4.0     5.0
    PARTICLE    SIZE
   6.0     7.0     8.0
Ml CROMETERS

-------
 ao
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
                 INITIAL    FLY  ASH  LEVEL
                 S02   LEVEL   13.2  mg / m^
                                           MID - WEST    FLY   ASH
                            AIR   FLOW   100  SCFH
                            WATER   FLOW   30 ml / mln

                            DUST    TUNNEL   STUDY
WITH (+) CHARGED
FOG,  S02  LEVEL
BELOW   0.26mg/m3
     PARTICLE    SIZE
     MICROMETERS
      i    t   	| 	  |	  a    i
  0.0      1.0      2.0     3.0     4.0     5.0     6.0     7.0     8.0     9.0

-------
 OF  CHARGED  FOG  ON  S02  AND
    EFFECT
    COPPER   COMPANY   FLY  ASH ,  OPERATING   TEMPERATURF
    340 -C.   645 F ,   LABORATORY   TESTS   IN  1  FT.3
    DUST   CHAMBER
210
    S02  CONCENTRATION
    PPM
180
150
120
 90
 60
30
                 140
BARS  SHOW  THE
SCATTER  OVER    120
TWO  RUNS
                 100
                 I
       NO
       FOG
 (40,
 FOG
                 80
                 60
                 40
                 20
                     DUST   DENSITY
                     mg /
                                        I
           I
NO
FOG
(40
FOG

-------
                                     ,' -- cv
                                   :.A:-«  ^:'  i


            FLY  ASH  /  SO
AGGLOMERATE
r  .= >.'
k ^^?>i-13%-^M--Tj;;.p:
    FLY  ASH /  S 0^  /  CHARGED  FOG  AGGLOMERATE


                        —*|  - [<— 30 y m              (47"

-------
DUST  DENSITY
mg /m3
LABORATORY   TEST  RESULTS ,  USE  OF  WATER
FOG  TO  CONTROL  DUST  FROM  AN  AIR
DRIVEN  GRINDER

ARO  CORP.  MODEL   7025  KH5C   AT  5000 RPM

GRINDING   CAST  IRON
                          FOG  WATER  FLOW
                          50 ml / min
                           TO  SAMPLER
                                               -I
                               80 mm
      PARTICLE   DIAMETER (MICROMETERS)
                                                                     (48
  0
                          8

-------
     1
8
PARTICLE
mg
0
DENSITY

LABORATORY  TESTS  OF  DUST CONTROL  BY  MEANS  OF  WATER  FOG
ARO   CORP.  MODEL  85OOLOO CHIPPING  HAMMER
WATER  FLOW   50 ml / m3
                                  CHIPPER IMPACT  AREA

                                6"D.  ROCK  CORE    \
                                (  GREY  GRANITE )
                WITH   WATER
                FLOW
                                   CHIPPING   DRY
                                                                TO  ANDERSON
                                                                SAMPLER
     PARTICLE   DIAMETER  ( MICROMETERS )
                                                       8

-------
                            STATION  "A"
                            •STATION  "B"
                                        o
                            FOG   GUNS
     r?
           «*G
                            TO   SAMPLER
                          £^
rvi
                BELT
        51
•/I • ' / 1 ' ' / / / ' ' i ' / / 1 / // / / ' / / / / / ' ' / / / 1 ' / ' '
                                / ' /
TEST SST UP CEMENT PLANT "A"
                                                BO]

-------
                WALL
                                  FOG   GUNS
BELT
               •EDGE   OF   BELT    PLATFORM
                                            i
          SAMPLING
          STATION
          5' ( 152cm )
          ABOVE   FLOOR
2' ( 50.7cm)
                   FLOOR   TO
                   CEILING
                   CURTAIN
               I
               j   5' (152 cm)
                     8' (244cm )
              PLAN VIEW OF SURGE BUILDING

                CEMENT PLANT "£»

-------

4.0
              ARIZONA
              Rl LLITO
PORTLAND   CEMENT
PLANT   FEB.  26,  1976
                                                                 CO.
3.0
2.0
 1.0
                                                INITIAL   DUST  LEVEL
                                                STATIONS  "A" AND  "B"
                                    WATER   FLOW   RATE "1
                                    94.6  ml / min

                                    AIR  FLOW   RATE
                                    200   S C F H
     DUST
     DENSITY
DATA   POINT
UNCERTAIN
                                                                       > 2  GUNS
                                                                    STATION   "A"
                                                                    STATION   "B"
                                                     +   CHARGED   FOG
                           PARTICLE   SIZE  ( MICROMETERS )
                                                         8
                                                          10
                                       II

-------
DUST  DENSITY
                                 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

                                'SURGE BIULDING

                                 CEMENT PLANT "A"
                            WATER   FLOW   RATE
                            60  ml / min

                            AIR  FLOW   RATE
                            200   S C F  H
               INITIAL    DUST    LEVEL
                            DUST  LEVEL   AFTER   30
                            MINUTES   OF   POSITIVE  FOG
        DATA
        UNCERTA IN
               DUST    LEVEL   AFTER    5   MINUTES
               OF    POSITIVE   FOG
             23456      78
              PARTICLE     SIZE  (MICROMETERS)    (53;

-------
          W/KfrySK ^'
                                                    SAMPLING   STATION
               BELT
EXPERIMENTAL  SET-UP CONCENTRATE CONVEYOR  COPPER COMPANY "A"
                                                               154)

-------
       10.6
DUST  DENSITY
  mg / m3
      RESPIRABLE
      FRACTION
      ONLY
                     NO   FOG
                           TOTAL   DUST
                           DENSITY
                                     WATER   FLOW
                                     60  m I / mi n
                                     CHARGED   FOG
               WATER   FLOW
               30 ml / mi n
               CHARGED   FOG
                   COPPER   C 0. "A "
        DATA   FROM    CONCENTRATE   CONVEYER

-------
EXPERIMENTAL   STUDY  COPPER  COMPANY  A  CONCENTRATE

PLANT  DROP  BOX



RESPIRABLE  DUST   ONLY



INITIAL  DUST  LEVEL  AVERAGE  OF  II  RUNS  6.95 mg/m3



DUST  LEVEL WITH (+) FOG  AVERAGE  OF  7  RUNS 2.45 mg/m:
NET  REDUCTION —65.4%
               6'91~45  100  = 65.4 %
                  b.
          •«•*-£.
                               0
                                      o

                          Q
                                 »
                                   TOP  VIEW
                                  BELT

                                  FLOW
                                 \DRIVE

                                  ROLLER
        FOG  GUN-



GCA  UNIT
                                             •DROP  BOX
                      5'
                                 FRONT  VIEW
                                                   BTG

-------
•RANSBURG    REA
 TYP — 4  PLACE S
           GUN
 WORK
ARE A
                              DOORWAY
RAI LROAD
BOX CAR
                                                           SAND
                                           TEST   SET-UP  AT
                                           CASTING   CO.  A
                                                           (57,

-------
TOTAL  RESP1RABLE   DUST
      FREE  SILICA   ONLY
                                  LEVELS  OF   RESPIRABLE  DUSV
 15
 10
1.5
               INITIAL  ( TOTAL )
               DUST  LEVEL
     mg
  / m3
1.0
     h 0.5
                                   CASTING   CO. 'V
                                   INITIAL  FREE
                                   SILICA  LEVEL
                        EFFECT  OF
                        (4-)  CHARGED
                        FOG  I20ml/min
                                             EFFECT  OF
                                             (-I-)   CHARGED
                                             FOG   120 ml / min

-------
160
140
120
100
 80
 60
 40
 20
                                          NO FOG
    DUST  DENSITY
    ARBITRARY  UNITS
            SAMPLE  TAKEN  ON
            WORKMAN IN  THE  ENCLOSURE
EFFECT  OF (+) CHARGED  FOG  ON DUST
LEVELS  IN  FOUNDRY  BAG SPLITTING ROOM

MATERIAL  CREAM-TEX
   32%  ALUMINA
   52%  SILICON  DIOXIDE

STEEL   COMPANY  B

DATA  TAKEN WITH MSA PERSONNEL
SAMPLERS
FOG  WATER FLOW 45 ml / min
FOG  GUN  AIR  FLOW  150  SCFH
AREA SAMPLES  IN .ENCLOSURE
5* WIDE  , 31 HIGH , 2 '/fc' DEEP

TWO  LOCATIONS  (A,B)
          A
        NO FOG
                    B
                 NO FOG
   (+) FOG
                            (+) FOG
                                             (+)FOG

-------
                                 TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read Imtructiom on rtie reverie before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/7-77-131
                                                        3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Use of Electrostatically Charged Fog for Control of
   Fugitive Dust Emissions
                                                        5. REPORT DATE
                                                         November  1977
                                                        6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)

Stuart A. Hoenig
                                                        8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
University of Arizona
Department of Electrical Engineering
Tucson, Arizona 85721
                                                        10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

                                                        EHE623
                                                        11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                        Grant R805228
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                        13. TYPE OP REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
 EPA, Office of Research and Development
 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                                                        13. TYPE OP REPORT AND Pt
                                                        Final; 12/76-10/77
                                                        14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                         EPA/600/13
is. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Mail Drop 61, 919/541-2925.
                               prOject officer for this report is Dennis C. Drehmel,
  ABSTRACT
               report gives  results of tests of the use of electrostatically charged fog
to control a wide variety of  industrial pollutants , ranging from silica flour to SO2 and
fly ash.   It has been demonstrated that most industrial pollutants acquire an electro-
static charge as they are dispersed into the air. If this  charged airborne material is
exposed to an oppositely charged water fog there is enhanced contact between the
particulates  and the fog droplets.  After contact is made, the wetted  particulates
agglomerate rapidly and fall out of the atmosphere. The tests  showed that,  in general,
there has been significant suppression with a minimum of water  fog. The technique is
therefore well suited to control of moving or fugitive dust sources where the usual
hooding and control systems cannot be applied.
17.
                              KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
                                           b.lOENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                     c. COSATI Field/Group
Air Pollution
Dust
Emission
Electrostatics
Fog
                                           Air Pollution Control
                                           Stationary Sources
                                           Particulate
                                           Fugitive Emissions
13B
11G

20C
14B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
 Unlimited
                                            19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report/
                                            Unclassified
                                                                     21. NO. OF PAGES

                                                                       92	
                                           20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                            Unclassified
                                                                     22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------