United States      Industrial Environmental Research EPA-600/7-79-070
Environmental Protection  Laboratory         February 1979
Agency        Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Apitron  Electrostatically
Augmented Fabric Filter
Evaluation

Interagency
Energy/Environment
R&D Program Report

-------
                  RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES


Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These ni'he broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional  grouping  was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

    1. Environmental Health Effects Research

    2. Environmental Protection Technology

    3. Ecological Research

    4. Environmental Monitoring

    5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

    6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports  (STAR)

    7. Interagency  Energy-Environment Research and Development

    8. "Special" Reports

    9. Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the INTERAGENCY ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT series. Reports in this series result from the
effort funded  under the  17-agency'"Federal Energy/Environment Research and
Development Program. These studies relate to EPA's mission to protect the public
health and welfare from  adverse effects of pollutants associated with energy sys-
tems. The goal of the Program is to assure the rapid development of domestic
energy  supplies in an environmentally-compatible manner by providing the nec-
essary environmental data and control technology. Investigations include analy-
ses of the transport of energy-related pollutants and their.health and ecological
effects; assessments  of,  and development .of, control technologies for energy
systems; and integrated assessments of a wide'range of energy-related environ-
mental  issues.
                       EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the participating Federal Agencies, and approved
for  publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the  views and policies of the Government, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service,-Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                EPA-600/7-79-070

                                     February 1979
Apitron Electrostatically
Augmented  Fabric  Filter
            Evaluation
                    by

           Larry G. Felix and Joseph D. McCain

             Southern Research Institute
             2000 Ninth Avenue, South
             Birmingham, Alabama 35205
              Contract No. 68-02-2181
            Program Element No. EHE624A
           EPA Project Officer: Dale L Harmon

        Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
          Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
           Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                 Prepared for

        U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          Office of Research and Development
              Washington, DC 20460

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures	iii
List of Tables	   vi
Abstract	

SECTIONS

    1     CONCLUSIONS 	    1

    2     INTRODUCTION  	    2

    3     DISCUSSION  	    8
             Description Of The Apitron Filter System ....    8
             Total Particulate Collection Results 	   16
             Cascade Impactor Results 	   16
             Ultrafine Particulate Data 	   34

APPENDIX

          Cascade Impactor Run Data	   52
             Cascade Impactor Run Data—November-December,
               1977 Test	   53
             Cascade Impactor Run Data—June, 1978 Test ...   84
                                 11

-------
                         List of Figures


FIGURE NO.                                                    Page

    1     Layout of sampling locations for tests of the
            Apitron mobile pilot plant	    4

    2     Layout of a full scale Apitron unit	    6

    3     Cutaway view of a trailer mounted, mobile, pilot
            plant Apitron unit	    9

    4     Principle of operation of the Apitron dust collec-
            tor 	   12

    5     Apitron dust collector operating cycle	   13

    6     Average inlet size distribution for the Apitron
            mobile unit tests	   20

    7     Average inlet size distribution for the Apitron
            mobile unit tests	   21

    8     Apitron fractional efficiency with aged Nomex bags,
            11/30/77-12/1/77, vs. aerodynamic particle dia-
            meter in micrometers	   22

    9     Apitron fractional efficiency with new Teflon bags,
            impactor measurements, 12/2/77, vs. aerodynamic
            particle diameter in micrometers	   23

   10     Apitron fractional efficiency with conditioned
            Teflon bags, 12/5/77-12/6/77, vs. aerodynamic
            particle diameter in micrometers	   24

   11     Apitron fractional efficiency as a conventional
            fabric filter  (Teflon bags), 12/7/77-12/8/77,
            vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micrometers.   25

   12     Average inlet size distribution for the full scale
            Apitron tests  	   27

   13     Average inlet size distribution for the full scale
            Apitron tests  	   28

   14     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            dust collector vs. aerodynamic particle diameter
            in micrometers as determined from cascade impac-
            tor data	   29
                                  111

-------
                    List of Figures (Cont'd.)

FIGURE NO.                                                    Page

   15     Fractional efficiency of a full scale Apitron
            unit operating as a conventional fabric filter
            vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micro-
            meters.  6/14-15/78	   30

   16     Fractional efficiency of a full scale Apitron
            unit operating as a conventional fabric filter
            vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micro-
            meters.  6/15-16/78	   31

   17     Fractional efficiency of a full scale Apitron
            unit operating as a conventional fabric filter
            vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micro-
            meters.  6/16-17/78	   32

   18     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit operating at full ESP power vs. aerody-
            namic particle diameter in micrometers  	   33

   19     Apitron fractional efficiencies with aged Nomex
            bags, 12/1/77, vs. Stokes particle diameter
            in micrometers	   35

   20     Apitron fractional efficiencies with new Teflon
            bags, 12/2/77, vs. Stokes particle diameter in
            micrometers	   36

   21     Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
            Teflon bags, 12/5/77,  vs.  Stokes particle dia-
            meter in micrometers	   37

   22     Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
            Teflon bags, 12/6/77,  vs.  Stokes particle dia-
            meter in micrometers	   38

   23     Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
            Teflon bags", operated as a conventional fabric
            filter, 12/7/77, vs. Stokes particle diameter
            in micrometers	   39

   24     Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
            Teflon bags, operated as a conventional fabric
            filter, 12/8/77, vs. Stokes particle diameter
            in micrometers	   40

   25     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit at 25% electrical energization vs. Stokes
            particle diameter in micrometers	   42
                                IV

-------
                    List of Figures (Cont'd.)

FIGURE NO.                                                    Page

   26     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit operated as a conventional baghouse vs.
            Stokes particle diameter in micrometers 	   43

   27     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit operated as a conventional baghouse vs.
            Stokes particle diameter in micrometers 	   44

   28     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit operated as a conventional baghouse vs.
            Stokes particle diameter in micrometers 	   45

   29     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit at 25% and 50% electrical energization vs.
            Stokes particle diameter in micrometers 	   46

   30     Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
            unit at full electrical energization vs. Stokes
            particle diameter in micrometers  	   47

   31     Full scale Apitron fine particle fractional effi-
            ciency at various ESP power levels vs. Stokes
            particle diameter in micrometers  	   49

   32a    Outlet concentration variations in the 0.5 to 1.5
            micrometer size range	   50

   32b    Outlet concentration variations in the 0.01 to 0.2
            micrometer size range	   51

-------
                        List of Tables


TABLE NO.                                                     Page

    1     Specification For Apitron Test Units	10

    2a    Apitron Mobile Unit Test Conditions	15

    2b    Apitron Full Scale Pilot Plant Test Conditions ...   15

    3     Performance Tests Results For The Mobile Apitron
            Pilot Plant	17

    4     Performance Test Results For The Full Scale Apitron
            Unit	   18
                              VI

-------
       EVALUATION OF AN APITRON ELECTROSTATICALLY AUGMENTED
                           FABRIC  FILTER
                             ABSTRACT

     This report presents the results of fractional and overall
mass efficiency tests of two Apitron electrostatically augmented
fabric filter dust collectors.  The tests were performed on a
mobile pilot scale system collecting fly ash produced by a pul-
verized coal-fired industrial boiler and on a full scale pilot
plant facility collecting redispersed silica dust.

     The first series of tests was conducted in December, 1977
on the mobile device and the second series of tests were con-
ducted in June, 1978 on the full scale pilot plant facility
located at the manufacturer's facilities in Buffalo, New York.

     Total particulate concentrations were determined at the
inlet and outlet of both devices.  Inlet and outlet emission
rates as a function of particle size were determined from about
0.5 ym to 8 ym on a mass basis using cascade impactors and from
about 0.01 ym to 1.0 ym using electrical mobility and optical
techniques.
                                 VII

-------
                             SECTION  1
                            CONCLUSIONS

     This evaluation was one of a series of studies being con-
ducted by the Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory of
         ••''"'    -      /1
the Environmental Protection Agency to identify and test novel
                       '        , : ">      ' '
devices which are capable of high efficiency collection of fine
particulates.  The test methods used may not have been consistent
with compliance-type methods, but were state-of-the-art tech-
niques for measuring mass and fractional efficiency and included
standard filtration methods as well as inertial, optical, and
electrical mobility techniques.

     The first novel control device tested was a small-scale,
mobile, electrostatically augmented fabric filter system  (APITRON).
The collection efficiency, as determined by conventional filter
techniques, when the system was collecting fly ash from a pulver-
ized coal-fired boiler,  ranged from 99.90% to 99.94%.  The system
pressure drop when operating in a normal mode at a face velocity
of 33 to 35 mm/sec  (6.5-6.9 fpm)  was approximately 3.0 cm to  3.8 cm
w.c.  (1.2-1.5 in. w.c.).  Fractional efficiencies in the size range
from about 0.2 \im to 1 ym were approximately 99.85% to 99.94%.  The
system energy usage during this first series of tests was 2500
Joules/SCM.

     Because of instrument difficulties with the electrical mobility
technique and indications of insufficient conditioning of the bags
used in the mobile unit  testing, a second series of tests was
performed.  This second  test series was performed on a full-scale
pilot plant facility maintained by the manufacturer, American
Precision Industries.  During this second series of tests, the
collection efficiency of the system, when collecting redispersed

-------
silica dust at ambient temperatures, ranged from 99.995% to
99.9994%.  The system pressure drop when operating in a normal
mode at a face velocity of 29.4 mm/sec  (5.8 fpm) was approxi-
mately 9.4 cm w.c. (3.7 in. w.c.).  Fractional efficiencies in
the size range from about 0.2 ym to 1.0 ym were approximately
99.90% to 99.999%.  The system energy usage during this series
of tests ranged from 1370 Joules/SCM at one-quarter ionizing
power in the ESP section to 3390 Joules/SCM at full ionizing
power.  Power off operation required reduced face velocities
and energy requirements to the range of 1500-2300 Joules/SCM.

-------
                             SECTION 2
                           INTRODUCTION

     This report presents results of tests conducted by Southern
Research Institute (SoRI) to determine the fine particle col^-
lection capabilities of the Apitron electrostatically augmented
fabric filter.  The goals of the tests were to determine the
overall mass efficiency and the fractional efficiency of the
system when operating under normal design conditions.  Two Api-
tron systems were tested during the program.  The first system
was a mobile pilot plant designed to process up to about 7 m3/rnin
(250 acfm) at face velocities up to about 75 mm/sec  (15 fpm).
This unit was tested on a slip-stream from a pulverized coal
boiler.

     Further tests were conducted on a full scale pilot plant
facility maintained by the manufacturer, American Precision
Industries, which was designed to operate at flow rates of about
283 m3/min (10,000 acfm).,  The system in this case collected
redispersed silica dust at ambient temperatures.

     Figure 1 is a schematic of the system layout for the first
series of tests.  The control device, together with  its power
supply, is mounted in the central section of a standard 40 foot
semi-trailer.  The rear section of the trailer houses a compressed
air supply for bag and tube cleaning and a blower which provides
the required system draft.  The forward section of the trailer
houses an office and control center.

-------
                                                    GAS FLOW
               INLET ULTRAFINE
               SAMPLING PORT
                 r
                    i
                  OUTLET ULTRAFINE
                  SAMPLING PORT
           OUTLET IMPACTOR SAMPLING PORT
      OUTLET MASS TRAIN SAMPLING PORT
  \
INLETIMPACTOR,
MASS TRAIN*.
SAMPLING PORT
Figure 1.  Layout of sampling locations for tests of
         the Apitron  mobile pilot plant.

-------
       The geometry of the test site was such that a  long  run
of ducting was required to convey the flue gases  from the  boiler
ducting to the trailer mounted filter unit.  This ducting  was
insulated but infiltration of ambient air at joints resulted
in a large temperature drop and substantial dilution  of  flue
gases between the sample take off point and the  trailer.   Ad-
ditional cooling of the flue gases took place in  the  Apitron
device proper, in which a trial heat recovery system  was being
evaluated by Apitron at the time of these tests.  Outlet gas
temperatures were generally about 95°C  (160°F).   The  flue  gas
temperature at the sample take off point was approximately 205°C
(400°F).  This dropped to about 110°C  (230°F) at  the  actual inlet
of the device.

       Two bag materials, Nomex and Teflon, were  used during
the tests of the mobile unit.  Air flows as measured  in  the out-
let ducting were about 7 am3/min  (250 acfm) .  Typical filter
pressure drops were about 3 cm w.c.  at these flow rates with
electrostatic augmentation, and 9 cm w.c. without electrostatics.
The specific collection area of the electrostatic portion  of
the system was about 8.6 m2/(am3/s)  (43 ft2/1000  acfm).  Operat-
ing voltages were about 30 kv and current densities were about
535 nA/cm2  (500 yA/ft2).

     The tests of the mobile unit took place during the  period
between November 29, 1977 and December 9, 1977.

     The second series were conducted on a  full  scale facility
as illustrated in Figure 2.  Redispersed silica  dust  is  drawn
into the inlet air duct and enters .the device at  the  lower right
hand side.  After passing through the wire-pipe  precipitator
tubes and bag filters it is drawn out through an  exit on the
far side of the device.  The inlet ducting  is 45.7 cm (18  inches)
O.D. and the outlet ducting is 122 cm  (48 inches) O.D.   The device

-------
                                                 FABRIC FILTER BAGS
              PRECIPITATION TUBES
PRECIPITATOR DISCHARGE ELECTRODE
                                                                CLEANING AIR MANIFOLD
                             PRECIPITATOR POWER SUPPLY
                               Figure 2. Layout of a full scale Apitron unit.

-------
operates using ambient air at ambient pressure and temperature
conditions.  During this series of tests, the ambient temper-
atures averaged around 22°C  (72°F).  The bags were constructed
of felted polyester material.  Typical system pressure drops
were about 9.1 cm w.c.  (3.6 in. w.c.) at a flow rate of 283
am3/roin  (10,000 acfm) with electrostatic augmentation to as much
as 25 cm w.c.  (10 in. w.c.) at a flow rate of 232 am3/min  (8200
acfm) without electrostatics.  Operating voltages ranged from
27 kV to 39 kV with current densities varying from 281 nA/cm2
(261 yA/ft2) to 773 nA/cm2 (718 yA/ft2).

     The second series of tests took place during the period
between June 12, 1978 and June 19, 1978.

-------
                             SECTION 3
                            DISCUSSION

     A total of four measurement techniques were used during
the tests.  These were:   (1) electrical mobility techniques for
determining the concentration and size distribution on a number
basis for particles having diameters from about 0.01 ym to about
0.3 ym,  (2) optical techniques to determine concentration and
size distributions for particles with diameters between about
0.3 ym and 2.0 ym, (3) inertial techniques using cascade impac-
tors for determining concentrations and size distributions on a
mass basis over the size  range from 0.3 ym and 6.0 ym, and  (4)
standard filtration techniques for determining total inlet and
outlet mass loadings.

DESCRIPTION OF THE APITRON FILTER SYSTEM

     Figure 3 provides a  cutaway view of the first pilot plant
tested.  The device is divided into two separate compartments,
which share a common inlet, hopper, and power supply but each
has its own exit duct and flow metering capability.  Only one
of the two compartments was used in these tests.  Pertinent di-
mensions and operating data for this and the full scale unit
are given in Table 1.

-------
COMPRESSED AIR
MANIFOLD
                                                                                      BAGS
                                                                                    JET PULKE NOZZLE


                                                                                       INSULATOR






                                                                                      TUBE SURFACE
                                                                                      COOLING WATER
                                                                                      MANIFOLD
                                                                                      CORONA WIRE
                                                                              HOPPER
                                                        DUST DISCHARGE
                              WATER OUTLET
                       Figure 3.  Cutaway view of a trailer mounted, mobile,
                                pilot plant Apitron unit.

-------
          TABLE 1.   SPECIFICATIONS FOR APITRON TEST UNITS
Precipitator Tube ID  (cm)
Precipitator Tube Length  (cm)
Number of tubes per compartment
Number of compartments
Number of bags per tube
Filter area per bag (m2)
Operating voltage full power  (kV)
Operating current per compartment
  (mA)
SCA (m2/am3/s)
Cleaning Pulse Pressure  (kPa)
Cleaning Pulse Duration  (ms)
Cleaning Interval (min)
Nominal air flow per  compartment
  (Am3/s) as tested
Operating Pressure Drop  (cm w.g.)
Bag Material
  Small  Scale
  Mobile Unit
     12.7
     83.8
        3
        2
        4
     0.293
       30
      7.5

      8.5
      241
       50
        6
     0.118

       3.3
    Teflon
     Felt
(23  oz/sq.yd.)
     and
  Nomex  Felt
(12  oz/sq.yd.)
 Full  Scale
 Pilot Plant
     15.2
    121.9
       72
        1
        1
      2.23
       39
      325

      8.9
      552
       50
        8
      4.72

       7.1
    Dacron
   Polyester
     Felt
(11 oz/sq.yd.)
                                10

-------
     Incoming air enters the precipitator section from below
with the upper portion of the hopper serving as an  inlet plenum
as illustrated in Figure 4.  The flow then passes upward,  through
the tubes of a set of parallel wire-pipe precipitators in  which
the particulate is charged arid much is precipitated.  Flow con-
tinues upward, past the .tubes, into and through the bags where
the final filtration takes place.  Clean air exits  the unit at
an exhaust located in the side of the bag housing section.  In
the mobile unit each tube  (and associated set of bags) is  cleaned
one at a time with a six minute interval between successive
cleanings of any one tube and bag set.  In the full scale  system,
six bag and tube sets are cleaned at a time.  Cleaning is  ini-
tiated by an electrical pulse from the control system which opens
a diaphragm valve for several tens of milliseconds.  A blow pipe
connected to the valve is then pressurized which results  in a
compressed air jet downward from a nozzle directly  above  and
concentric with the corona wire of the tube being cleaned.  The
jet of air flowing downward through the tube entrains and  mixes
with a secondary air flow sweeping the tube clean of deposited
dust by the mixture of high velocity air.  The secondary  air
flow, passing from the outside to the inside of the bags,  snaps
the bags inward and dislodges the dust deposits from the  bags.
(A 708 am3/min (25,000 acfm) unit would require about 0.8.5 m3/min
(30 scfm) of compressed air at 80 psig.)  Vertical  height  con-
straints in the mobile pilot plant required the use of four short
bags in parallel over each precipitator tube rather than  one
longer bag over each tube as is used in full scale  systems.
The system operation is illustrated in Figure 5.

     In the first series of tests, the first two days of  testing
was done with relatively old Nomex bags in use.  These bags had
been subjected to sulfuric acid attack during an earlier  test
program and were tested only because a new set of Teflon  bags
                                11

-------
                   BAG HOOKS ABOVE
                        ROW
                        CLEANING
                         COMP. AIR
                         MANIFOLD
                                                        BAG SNAPS
                                                        INTO TUBE
                                                        SHEET
                        DIAPHRAGM
                           PRECIP.
                           TUBE
    ON STREAM
    FLOW
CORONA WIRE HOOKS
ON H.V. GRID. SPRING
TENSIONED AND
INSULATED AT TOP
INSULATOR
                                                        WALKWAY
                                                         g" •*

                                                         SPRING
                                                       PRECIPITATOR
                                                       SECTION
                               HOPPER
                   HIGH VOLTAGE
                   TO GRID
                 Figure 4.  Principle of operation of the Apitron
                        dust collector.
                             12

-------
NORMAL
FILTRATION
START      END
CLEANING   CLEANING
RESUME
FILTRATION
        Figure 5. Apitron dust collector operating cycle.
                         13

-------
which were scheduled to be used were not immediately available.
After two days of testing with the Nomex bags the Teflon bags
arrived and were installed.  One day of tests were performed
with the new, unconditioned Teflon material, after which the
bags were run continuously for two more days over a weekend for
conditioning before testing was resumed.

     After testing was resumed two days of data were obtained
with electrostatic augmentation at a face velocity of  about 35
mm/sec  (6.9 fpm), followed by two days of testing without  elec-
trostatic augmentation.  One of the tests without electrostatic
augmentation was run at a face velocity of 33 mm/sec  (6.5  fpm)
and the other at a face velocity of 14 mm/sec  (2.7 fpm).

     The operating conditions for the Apitron device during the
seven test days  are given in Table 2a.  As mentioned earlier,
infiltration of  ambient air resulted in a marked temperature
drop throughout  the ducting from the boiler to the Apitron trailer
This infiltration also resulted in non-negligible dilution of
the stack gases  between the inlet and outlet sampling  locations.
All efficiencies which are given herein have been corrected to
remove  the effect of this dilution.

     In the second series of tests, Dacron polyester felt  bags
were used for all testing.  These bags had been in use for several
months  and were  considered to be fully seasoned.  The  first two
days of testing  were done at a quarter power ESP condition with
a bag face velocity of about 30 mm/sec  (5.8 fpm).  This was fol-
lowed by three days of testing during which no electrostatic
augmentation was used.  Face velocities during the nonaugmented
tests varied from 24 mm/sec  (4.8 fpm) to 27 mm/sec  (5.3 fpm).
During  the two final days of testing, the effect of electrostatic
augmentation at  various power levels was investigated.  During
this period the  face velocity was kept constant at 29.4 mm/sec
(5.79 fpm).
                                14

-------
                                                  TABLE 2a.   APITRON MOBILE UNIT TEST CONDITIONS
ESP conditions

Bag
Date Material
11/30/77 Noraex
12/1/77 Noraex
12/2/77 Teflon3
12/5/77 Teflon
12/6/77 Teflon
12/7/77 Teflon
12/8/77 Teflon



Outlet gas
amVmin
7.31
7.00
8.47
7.42
7.00
6.91
2.92


Outlet
flow temp.
acfm °C
258 74
247 77
299 71
262 74
247 74
244 74
103 54



Bag Face
mm/sec
34.7
33.2
40.2
35.2
33.2
32.8
13.8
TABLE 2b.


Velocity
fpm
6.83
6.53
7.91
6.93
6.53
6.46
2.72
APITRON


Voltage
kv
31
31
30.5
30
29
0
0
FULL SCALE


Current
mA
7.5
7.5
7.5
8.0
8.5
0
0

Specific
raVamVs
8.25
8.60
7.11
8.11
8.60
0
0

collecting area
ft2/1000 acfm
41.9
43.7
36.1
41.2
43.7
0
0
Current
density
nA/cm2
750
750
750
800
850
0
0
Energy
usage
joules/m3
1910
2000
1620
1940
2120
0
0
Apitron
pressure
drop
cm w.c.
5.3
5.3
0.5
3.0
3.8
8.9
3.3
Energy
usage,
air
moving
joules/m3
530
520
50
300
380
868
323
PILOT PLANT TEST CONDITIONS





ESP conditions

Bag
Date Material
6/12-6/14 Dacron
6/14-6/15 Dacron
6/15-6/16 Dacron
6/16-6/17 Dacron
6/17-6/18 Dacron
6/18-6/19 Dacron

Outlet gas
am /min
283 10
243 8
261 9
232 8
283 10
283 10
Outlet
flow temp.
acfm °C
,000 20
,600 24
,200 22
,200 24
,000 24
,000 24

Bag Face
mm/sec
29.4
25.3
27.0
24.1
29.4
29.4

Velocity
fpm
5.79
4.98
5.32
4.75
5.79
5.79

Voltage
kv
27
0
0
0
27-33
39

Current
mA
118
0
0
0
118-190
325

Specific
m2/am3/s
8.91
0
0
0
8.91
8.91

collecting area
ft2/1000 acfm
45.2
0
0
0
45.2
45.2
Current
density
nA/cm2
281
0
0
0
281-432
773
Energy
usage
joules/m3
675
0
0
0
675-1330
2690

Apitron
pressure
drop
cm w.c.
7.1
21.6
22.9
14.6
7.1
7.1
Energy
usage,
air
moving
joules/m3
720
2200
2330
1490
720
720
3New,  clean Teflon bags installed overnight of 12/1 -  12/2

-------
     The operating conditions of the full scale collector are
given in Table 2b for the tests conducted during June 1978.

TOTAL PARTICULATE COLLECTION RESULTS

     The results of the total particulate tests of the mobile
unit are given in Table 3.  The measured inlet and outlet concen-
trations are given together with the appropriate dilution correc-
tions, the corrected total particulate collection efficiency,
and the total power usage of the control device.  The power
consumption figures do not include the required compressor power
for the cleaning pulses nor any conversion efficiencies  for  fans,
motors, power supplies, etc.  The estimated total energy usage
including losses in the latter items is approximately 40% greater
than the figures given in the table.

     Table 4 shows conditions and results of the tests of the
full scale unit.  As with the earlier data on energy usage,  the
required compressor power for the cleaning pulses and the con-
version efficiencies for fans, motors, power supplies, etc.  are
not included.

CASCADE IMPACTOR RESULTS

     Inertial sizing of the inlet and outlet particulates was
accomplished using modified Brink impactors and University of
Washington Mark III impactors.

     For the mobile unit tests, sampling was done at isokinetic
rates using heated enclosures to contain the impactors and short
stainless steel probes for conveying the samples'from the ducts
to the impactors.  In situ operation of the impactors was not
possible because of the small duct dimensions - 20 cm  (8 in.)
at the inlet and 15 cm (6 in.) at the outlet.  Modified  Brink
                                16

-------
       TABLE 3.  PERFORMANCE TESTS RESULTS FOR THE MOBILE APITRON PILOT PLANT
Date
Inlet loading,
  mg/DNm3
Outlet loading,
    mg/DNm3
12/1/77
12/2/77

12/5/77
12/6/77

12/7/77


12/8/77

4600
3940
4580
5580
4960
16150
2170
2060
2150
3230
2950
10.6
4.26
5.54
3.43
2.09
2.33
0.99
1.50

1.20
1.14
                                          Dilution  Collection
                                         correction efficiency,
Total energy usage
factor
1.79
1.46
1.60
1.50
%
99.59
99.84
99.902
99.940
joules/am"
2520
1670
2240
2500
hp/1000 acfm
1.60
1.06
1.42
1.58
                                           1.63
                                           1.89
                                               99.905
                                               99.928
                                              868
                                              323
             0.55
             0.20

-------
                     TABLE 4.  PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FOR THE FULL SCALE APITRON UNIT
                          Inlet loading,    Outlet loading,
Collection
efficiency,
Total energy usage
Date
6/12
6/14
6/15
6/16
6/17
6/18
- 6/14
- 6/15
- 6/16
- 6/17
- 6/18
- 6/19
mg/DNm
12800
12600
12800
12400
12800
12800
mg/DNm3
0.172
0.480
0.366
0.126
0.119
0.094
%
99.9987
99.9962
99.9971
99.9990
99.99907
99.99927
joules/am3
1370
2120
2250
1440
1750-2400
3580
hp/1000 acfm
0.87
1.35
1.43
0.91
1.11-1.52
2.27
00

-------
impactors were used for all inlet sampling and University of
Washington impactors were used for outlet sampling.  Both types
were used with Apeizon H grease coatings on stainless steel shim
stock impaction substrates.

     The average inlet size distribution for  the mobile  unit
tests is given in Figure 6 on a cumulative percent by weight
basis and in Figure 7 on a cumulative mass loading  (concentra-
tion) basis.

     Fractional efficiencies are shown on an  aerodynamic diam-
eter basis, by day, in Figures 8 through 11.  Collection effi-
ciencies in excess of 99% were consistently obtained in  the fine
particle size range (-3ym) when either the Teflon or Nomex bags
were used.  The efficiency curves for both materials showed effi-
ciency minima near a diameter of 7 pm which may have resulted
from primary or agglomerated particles bleeding through  the
fabric of the bags.  The efficiencies were higher on the two
days of testing with the ESP section de-energized than during
the tests with power on.  The highest efficiencies during the
entire test series were obtained on Dec. 8 when the device was
operated as a conventional baghouse at a low  face velocity.
There is some uncertainty in the significance of the differences
among the results for the various test conditions with the Teflon
bags because the bags were being tested immediately after in-
stallation and for a few days thereafter.  The efficiency of
the device showed a constant improvement with each day of testing
after the new bags were installed.  Thus, the efficiencies which
were obtained during the last two days of testing with the ESP
de-energized may have been equaled or exceeded had it been ener-
gized.  Previous testing by the manufacturer  had shown higher
efficiencies with electrostatic augmentation  than without, for
tests at fixed face velocities.
                                 19

-------


i__
r^
o:
LJ
0.
u
M
i
h-
<
_l
a




33 • 33 -
qq qc: •
^ri^
93.8:
r^n r~ •
99 & 5-
99 1
98"
^•^k^
35-;
90^
80^
70 i
GOi
50^
401
30 i
30]
loi
cr :
^j .
si
1-
-
0.5^
0— ^
«ET
o.6±H
n.n-i -
M
M
L







r •
• ^
'• »
! »
- o
r o
- »
™ ^
a
®
»
»
= » *
; 	 ••

	 1 1 	 1 	 1 1 1 1 1 1 	 1 	 1 	 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1
lo-1                   10°                   lo1


PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

     Figure 6. Average inlet size distribution for the Apitron
            mobile unit tests. Cumulative percent (by weight
            basis) vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in
            micrometers.


                     20

-------
     10
    103
ID
M
a

§
    101.
LJ
M
  10
     '1
                                                       ^lO1

                                               M
                                               a
                                               a

                                              ,cn


                                               LJ
                                               M
                                              i<
                                                       10
-«	»	1   I I  I M |
H	1	1   I I  I I  I |
                             10°                   101

       PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
             Figure 7. Average inlet size distribution for the Apitron
                   mobile unit tests. Cumulative mass loading in
                   mg/ACM vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in
                   micrometers.
                           21

-------
M
       101-
icrS
     10
                       a
                    e> ,
                   s o-
                   o
                              a>
                                     °j>.
                  FACE VELOCITY, mm/sec
                   O34.7
                   ^33.2
                B   8888888
-!	8  8 1  Hfr-fr
                                                         99*9
                                                      i99.99
^

 10"1                 10^                  101


 PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

      Figure 8. Apitron fractional efficiency with aged Nomex
            bags, 11/30/77-12/1/77, vs. aerodynamic
            particle diameter in micrometers.
                              22

-------
 101-
1CT1: :
10'
10
*
                               ::90.0
                'in-'1
       1
i   i  i i  n H
                               H—i  i  i i  11
                                                       H
                                                   h-
                                           ° 99 • 9 C3
                                  99.99
    ic
    PARTICLE  DIAN€TER  (MICROMETERS)
        Figure 9. Apitron fractional efficiency with new Teflon
              bags, impactor measurements, 12/2/77, vs.
              aerodynamic particle diameter in micrometers.
                       23

-------
     t
10
ri
10
r3.
                                                  "90*0
                 on
              I
    10
    ri
           FACE VELOCITY, mm/sec
            O  32.8
            ®  33.2
H	8—8  8  8 H M
              10°
                                   -J	1  8 U H
                                                        M
                                                 "99.99
101
  K99-999
    PARTICLE  DIAiVETER  (MICROMETERS)
         Figure 10.  Apitron fractional efficiency with conditioned
                Teflon bags, 12/5/77-12/6/77, vs. aerodynamic
                particle diameter in micrometers.
                         24

-------
H
      10
1-2--
      10
r3.
                  FACE VELOCITY, mm/sec
                    O32.8
                                  0.0
                                                           v o; o
                                                           ::-30.0
                                                          * SB-PS
                                                                    H
          10
    ri
                 I   I II I  I
10°
        -\	1	1  I  I  I I
                                                             33.9Q
                         -:33.33
101
   .33.333
          PARTICLE  DIAEJER
                Figure '11.  Apitron fractionalefficiency as a conventional
                        fabric filter (Teflon bags), ,1 2/7/77-1 2/8/77,
                        vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micrometers.
                                 25

-------
     During the tests of the full scale unit, as in the earlier
mobile unit test, inertial sizing of the inlet and outlet par-
ticulate was accomplished using modified Brink and University
of Washington Mark III,  (U of W), impactors.  Tn situ sampling
was possible at the outlet, but due to the small size of the
inlet ducting, all inlet sampling was done with a short extrac-
tive probe and nozzle.   Isokinetic sampling could not be main-
tained at the inlet because at the impactor flow rates used  (1.7
1pm, 0.06 acfm), a nozzle opening less than 1 mm would have been
required to sample isokinetically.  At the outlet, the impactors
were operated at a higher than normal flow rate  (42.5 1pm, 1.5-
1.6 acfm) and the samples were taken over 24-48 hour periods.
These samples were not taken isokinetically because large enough
sampling nozzles were not available.  All impactor data have
been corrected, by particle size, to account for the effects
of non-isokinetic sampling.

     In order to be able to sample at high flow rates at the
outlet, stages 6 and 7 of the U of W impactors were removed and
a spacer of the appropriate length was inserted.  The high outlet
flow rates were required in order to collect weighable quantities
of dust in the time available for each test.  Even so, one to
two day sampling times were required.  Inlet sampling was done
in one port with 3 point traverses.  Outlet sampling was done
in 2 ports, at 90° to each other.  Three point traverses were
used there as well.

     Figure 12 shows the corrected average inlet size distri-
bution on a cumulative percent by weight basis and Figure 13
shows corresponding .data on a cumulative mass loading basis.
Figures 14 through 18 show fractional efficiencies on an aero-
dynamic size basis for the tests conducted on the full scale
unit.  The data obtained during this test series shows the ex-
pected increased emissions for operation as a conventional fabric
filter.
                                 26

-------
33*33
 oo  a
 tJZJ.o
 33 0.5
    33
    38
    35l
F
LJ
Q_

LJ
BO
70
BO
50
      lir
   0.5U
 0.01
H	1—I  I  M I H
^	1—i  i  i i i H
       10'1                 10°                  101
       PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
         Figure 12. Average inlet size distribution for the full scale
                Apitron tests. Cumulative percent (by weight
                basis) vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in
                micrometers.
                          27

-------
    IDS:
    103::
a  i°*
    UCftr
   10
1-1.
•4—H—I  I II I H-
                            —i—i—i   i M i M
icr1                  10°                  lo1
PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
           Figure 13.  Average inlet size distribution for the full scale
                  Apitron tests. Cumulative mass loading in
                  mg/ACM vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in
                  micrometers.
                              28

-------
  10°::
1CT3:
10
   ,-4.
                                                    T 90.0
                                         :99.0
                                                    ±93.9   H
                                                                H
H	1	1  I  I I  I I |
H	1—i  i  i M 11  99
                                                    ::99.99
    10'1                  10°                    101

    PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
        Figure 14. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
               dust collector vs. aerodynamic particle diameter
               in micrometers as determined from cascade
               impactor data. ESP operating at 25% of
               nominal maximum power.
                          29

-------
 10°::
icr1-:
10
   r4.
   1
                                      ::99.0
±99,9
                                             • I
H	1	1  MINI	1	1	1  I  I I I 11 93
                                                             H
                                                  : r 33,. 39
                                                  :r 99.993
    1CT1                 10°                   101


    PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

         Figure 15. Fractional efficiency of a full scale Apitron
               unit operating as a conventional fabric filter
               vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micro-
               meters. 6/14—15/78
                         30

-------
H
Q.
       10°,:
      icr1*
      1CT2: :
      1CT3: r
                                                         T90.0
                  r33-0

                                     lull
                  H	1	1   Mill
H	'	1  Mill) 99.9999
                "99.999
          icr1                  10°                   lo1


          PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

              Figure 16. Fractional efficiency of a full scale Apitron
                     unit operating as a conventional fabric filter
                     vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micro-
                     meters. 6/15-16/78
                                31

-------
 ID?::
ID'2: :
1CT3: :
10'
                                   a a
                                                :r99.0
                                                "99.9
                                 1—i—i  i i i i ij 99.9999
                                                           LJ

                                                           U
                                                           M
                                                           U.
                                                           b.
                                                           U
                                                -99.99
                                                -:99.999
    1CT1                 10°                  lO1'

    PARTICLE DIAhCTER  (MICROMETERS)
         Figure 17. Fractional efficiency of a full scale Apitron
                unit operating as a conventional fabric filter

                vs. aerodynamic particle diameter in micro-
                meters. 6/16-17/78
                         32

-------
 10°::
icrH
ID'2: :
1CT3- r
10
   -4
                '•...,.•'
H—i—i  Mini
                                            T90.0
                                  -99.0
H	1	1  I  I I I I
                                 •" 99- 99
              ::99•999
   10'1               10°                101


    PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

         Figure 18. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
               unit operating at full ESP power vs. aero-
               dynamic particle diameter in micrometers.
99.9999
                      33

-------
     Complete data from all cascade impactor runs for both test
series are given in the appendix.

ULTRAFINE PARTICULATE DATA

     The SoRI ultrafine sampling system was used in conjunction
with a Thermosystems Model 3030 Electrical Aerosol Analyzer  (EAA)
for determining particle concentrations and size distribution
data over the size range from 0.01 ym to 0.3 ym.  A Climet opti-
cal particle counter (Model 208) was also used with the system
for determining concentrations and size distributions over the
size range from approximately 0.3 ym to 2 ym.

     Fractional efficiencies determined with this system  for
the mobile Apitron unit are shown in Figures 19 through 24 to-
gether with efficiencies determined with the cascade impactors.
In these figures the impactor results are shown on a Stokes  diam-
eter basis because the Stokes diameters better represent  the
particle size parameters on which the EAA and optical counter
operate.

     The EAA results for 12/5 through 12/8 are probably invalid.
Although the EAA appeared to be functioning normally during  this
period the mismatch in the data obtained with it and those ob-
tained with the optical counter and  impactors  indicate  otherwise.
Disassembly of the EAA upon return to SoRI revealed a broken
corona discharge wire in the aerosol charging section.  The
standard checkout procedures for the instrument performed during
the tests and after return to the laboratory did not indicate
any malfunction in spite of the broken wire.  Usually such an
occurance will be revealed by these instrument checks.  From
the appearance of the fractional efficiency curves the breakage
is believed to have occurred over the weekend of 12/3 to  12/5
and the ultrafine results shown for tests on and after 12/5  should,
as mentioned before, be disregarded.
                                 34

-------
10
r3.
               AEAA


                IMP
                                              ::90.0
i  i i mil    i—i i  i mil    i  i  i i mi
                 icr1


    PARTICLE DIAKCTER  (MICRDMLILHb)

          Figure 19. Apitron fractional efficiencies with aged
                Nomex bags, 12/1/77, vs. Stokes particle
                diameter in micrometers.
                                                   •°u
                                                      M

                                                      fe
                                             -99.9
                                           "'39»99
.99.999
                       35

-------
IDS:
ID"1: r
10
    3
     rfc     A EAA
           (D OPC
           I IMP
        H—H-M-H*
                                               To.o
                                 1
                                         1
•w-
c   i s  n w
                                                 30*0
    ID"61          10'1          10^           101
    PARTICLE  DIAS^ETER  (MICRDMETER5)
.99.999
         Figure 20. Apitron fractional efficiencies with new
               Teflon bags, 12/2/77, vs. Stokes particle
               diameter in micrometers.
                        36

-------
J.LT-:
^ f^^^L
1 t. ^^^
H
ICT1.
•
10"*;

-m-3
CA J*A q
• «
: A A ;
A A
• i
• •• *•
> •
• A EAA "
\ ®OPC ;
r $ IMP
> •
, •
	 1 	 1 — I I I 1 1 14 1 	 1 I I I 1 1 14 1 1 1 1 I 1 It-
r U«U
:9C).0
e
O
j—
•99.99

_ QQ.QQQ
10"5          10"1          ±CP           101


PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

    Figure 21. Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
           Teflon bags, 12/5/77, vs. Stokes particle
           diameter in micrometers.
                     37

-------
 ID1::
 lOP,:
10
r3.
                   EAA
                   OPC
                   IMP
10-
                10
                   "1
                                                  rO.O
                                               rSOaO
                                                101
    PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICRDMETEFS)
         Figure 22. Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
               Teflon bags, 12/6/77, vs. Stokes particle
               diameter in micrometers.
                                                          *  V
                                                          u
                                                          H
                                                          fe
                                                          h-
                                                          s
                          38

-------
 101,:
icrH
10"5T:
10'
EAA

OPC

IMP
                                                orO.O
                             -90.0
                   -\—i  linn
                            .-99,9
  	1—1111 ni|    i—MM nij

10"5         10"1          10°           101


PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

     Figure 23. Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
           Teflon bags, operated as a conventional fabric
           filter, 12/7/77, vs. Stokes particle diameter in
           . micrometers.
                         39

-------
     rA  A
 IDS:
10'1: :
10
r3.
                        A
               AEAA


                1 IMP
                                              -90.0
    10'
i  i i nnj	i—i  i Mini	1—i i \ Hi>t 99.999
                10
        rl
Iflp
                                                  99.0Q
                                             ::99.9
                                             -99.99
101
    PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

         Figure 24. Apitron fractional efficiencies with conditioned
               Teflon bags, operated as a conventional fabric
               filter, 12/8/77, vs. Stokes particle diameter in
               micrometers.
                         40

-------
     The same System utilized in the November-December, 1977
test was used in a simplified form for the full scale unit test-
ing.  The simplifications were possible because the flue gas
was ambient air at ambient conditions.  Therefore, no heated
probes were used, and other than dilution, no special handling
of the sample stream was required.  No dilution was required
for outlet sampling at this location.

     The redispersed silica dust was found to contain essentially
no particles smaller than about 0.1 to 0.2 ym.  Therefore, the
ambient urban aersol was monitored without dilution upstream
of the redispersed dust injection point and this urban aerosol
was used to compute efficiencies in the 0.01 to 0.1 pm size
range.

     Figures 25-30 show the results of tests of the full scale
unit with respect to efficiency from measurements made with the
EAA, Climet, and cascade impactors.  Again the impactor data
are shown on a Stokes diameter basis.  Figure 25 shows efficiency
measurements made during 57 hours of 1/4 power operation on 6/12-
6/14, 1978.  The next 3 figures, Figures 26 through 28 show daily
averages of efficiency measurements made for 3 successive days
without electrostatic augmentation.

     Measurements made on 6/14-15 and 6/15-16 with no augmenta-
tion show almost identical behavior with efficiencies well below
that seen for power on operation.  However, Figure 28 shows re-
sults which are typical of power on operation albeit at a lower
face velocity.  This behavior is unexplained.  Continued testing
by Apitron personnel during power off operation prior to and
subsequent to the SRI testing consistently showed much lower
efficiencies in power off than in power on operation.  Test-
ing with electrostatic augmentation at higher ESP power levels
than those used on the 12th through the 14th took place on
                                 41

-------

101-
I
10°:
10'1-
ID'2-
•
icr3;
•
«
•
in-4-
" <
»
;


•»

1


'-."I :
» 0
• :
6/12-14 1° TJ ;
1/4 POWER I 0 rl | ;
J| Jfl i .
£ EAA
o OPC :
j IMP ;
29.4 mm/sec FACE VELOCITY

r99.0
• ^Jtj Q I «J
• ^ F^J * »-J / %
: U
: M
• 99* 99 LJ
~ 99*999
-QO QQQQ
10
    5
               ic
                   1
101
PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

      Figure 26. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
             unit at 25% electrical energization vs. Stokes
             particle diameter in micrometers.
                     42

-------
 10°::
icrH
icr5-:
1CT3: :
10
             6/14-15
             NO POWER
                EAA
              o OPC
                IMP
             25.3 mm/sec FACE VELOCITY
H—i  i i mil	1—i  MIIII
~\
 icrB         icr1
 PARTICLE DIAMET
                                                T90.0
                                   t:
                                             :r99,,99
<—i i  i HIM  99.9999
                                10°          101"
                              (MICROMETERS)
          Figure 26. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
                unit operated as a conventional baghouse vs.
                Stokes particle diameter in micrometers.
                        43

-------
101-


10P:
10*:

io-s-


10'3-
•

10'4-
1C

A
A
»

:
^IIIl
• 6/15-16 0
'. NO POWER °°
O
A EAA
; O OPC
\ IMP
27.0 mm/sec FACE VELOCITY
rs 10'1 icf





.".
B »^ •
I *»
•





1C
-30.0


:33.0
:33.3 Q
: M
b.
fa
i_
r^
• ^Q« 33 LJ
1

-33.333

- 33 » 3333
?
PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)


      Figure 27. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
             unit operated as a conventional baghouse vs.
             Stokes particle diameter in micrometers.
                      44

-------
ID'2::
ID"3' :
10
   ,-4.
                                                 -93.0
                                                 -93.9
6/16-17

NO POWER


A EAA


O OPC


§ IMP

24.1 mm/sec FACE VELOCITY
                                 B
                                  a
                                 O
                                         •  •
       "s
            i  i  i inn	1—i  i 11 ni{	1—i  i  11 nil  93.3333
                                                • ~ 99«99  LJ
                                                •;' 99.999
    10
    PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

           Figure 28. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
                 unit operated as a conventional baghouse vs.
                 Stokes particle diameter in micrometers.
                        45

-------
 IDS:
10°::
10
1-2--
10
       •
       o
                                                     or   0.0
                 EAA  OPC
6/17-18   1/4 POWER   O    a


  6/18    1/2 POWER   0    A


     29.4 mm/sec FACE VELOCITY
                                ::3D.O
                                                 ::99.Q
-3.r
 ICT5

 PARTICLE DIAMET
        i i  i
                                       1 — i  i i IIH|  39 . 399
                                •:99•99
                                   10°            101"
                                 (MICROMETERS)
        Figure 29. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
               unit at 25% and 50% electrical energization vs.
               Stokes particle diameter in micrometers.
                           46

-------
 10°::
ID"1::
ID"8.:
ID'3, :
          6/18-19
          FULL POWER


          & EAA
     +    O OPC


          £ IMP


          29.4  mm/sec FACE VELOCITY
                                                T30oO
:r33.0
                                                            • i

                                                            fc
•' 33.
-33.333
10"4H	1—i  i  i mil	1—i  i i mil	1—i  i 11 nil 39.9333
                      1          10°           101
    PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)

          Figure 30. Fractional efficiency of the full scale Apitron
                 unit at full electrical energization vs. Stokes
                 particle diameter in micrometers.
                         47

-------
June 18/19.  These results showed similar ultrafine efficien-
cies but somewhat higher efficiencies for larger particles
than the data from June 12/14.

     Examination of Figures  25  through  30 reveals  that,  within
the scatter of the data, there  are no significant  differences
in collection efficiencies between tests with  and  without  electro-
static augmentation for sizes smaller than  about 0.5  ym  to 1.0
ym.  On the other hand, for  diameters in the 1 ym  to  10  ym size
range the  efficiencies with  electrostatic augmentation are signi-
ficantly higher.  Particle penetrations  in  these size ranges
were reduced approximately 6  fold at 25% of nominal maximum ESP
power and  10 fold at 100% of  nominal maximum ESP power.

     Figure  31 summarizes efficiency information obtained  with
the EAA for ESP power on operation as determined with the  ultra-
fine system.  There appears  to  be no great  change  in  efficiency
as a function of power level  over the range tested.   Thus, the
energy usage during these tests may have been  in excess  of that
required to obtain the measured performance in the ultrafine
size range.

     Particle concentrations  in both the ultrafine (dia. - 0.1
ym) and fine particle  (0.1 ^  dia - 3 ym) size  ranges  showed large
concentration swings related  to bag cleaning.   Figures  32a and
32b show sample traces of the output signals from  an  optical
particle counter and condensation nuclei counter sampling  the
outlet of  the full scale system.  Approximately seventy  percent
of the particles in the 0.5  to  1.5 ym size  range appear  to be
emitted in "cleaning puffs".
                                 48

-------
      0.0
     90.0
f  99.0
o
z
LLJ

O
O

o
<

-------
o
z
LU
CJ
z
o
o
LU
          i
J	L
 18
                               i     i     i     i     r    i     i

                    16
14
12
 10         8


TIME, minutes
                        Figure 32a.  Outlet concentration variations in the 0.5 to

                                    1.5 micrometer size range.  Concentration spikes

                                    are the result of bag cleaning.
                                                        50

-------
           1     I     I     I     I     I     I     I     I     I
                                                  I     I     I     I     I      I     I     I
<
cc
o

8
LU
LU
DC
                     I     I     I     I     I
          18
16
14
                                          12
 10         8

TIME, minutes
                          Figure 32b.  Outlet concentration variations in the 0.01 to
                                       0.2 micrometer size range.  Major increases
                                       follow the cleaning of bags.
                                                      51

-------
                            APPENDIX

                    CASCADE IMPACTOR RUN DATA
This appendix is divided into two parts.  Part 1 contains inlet
and outlet cascade impactor run data for the November-December,
1977 test.  Part 2 contains the corresponding data from the
June, 1978 test.
                                52

-------
            PART 1






  CASCADE IMPACTOR RUN DATA




November-December, 1977 Test
              53

-------
  AVCI-1    12-1-77  1539 - 1639
  IMPACTOR FLOWP.ATE B 0.027 ACFM
  IMPACTQR PRESSURE nROP =  0.3IN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY a 2.27 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 « 11.07
  CALC. MASS LOADING a 7'.'561E»01 GR/ACF
  IHPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INOE* NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. CGR/ACP) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM, (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
  DN/OLOGO (NO. PARTICLE8/DHCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  -  A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  310.0 F a isu.u c              SAMPLING DURATION  •   30.00  MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE =  310.0 F = 154.a c
 STACK PRESSURE a 28.72 IN. OF HG     MAX'. PARTICLE DIAMETER »  300.0  MICROMETERS
            CO
   0.00
  GR/DNCF
  SI
  2
a'.06
                           S2
                           3
                         2,65
N2 B 73.81          02 a  7.38
    1.8206Ei03 MG/ACM
    S3        31        85
    056
  1.66      0.90      0,32
  S.9<|      2.«7      O.«l
    so
    1
  7.26
 13.35     lf.35      8.42
  9.63E + 02  B'.1BE + 02  6.07E*02  2.84E*02  1.786*02  6.56Et01
67.79     40.41     20.10     10.59      4'.63      2'.4U
  1.23E+03  7'.36E*02  3.66E*02  1.93E+02  8.43E + 01  4.44E+01
  2.03E + 03  l'.21E + 03  6.01E + 02  3.17E + 02  1.S8E + 02  7.28E + 01
  5.39E°01  3'.22E=01  r.60E«01  8.43E-02  3.69£o02  !.94E=02
  8,e5E°01  5'.28E = 01  2,62E«01  1.38E=01  6'.05E°02  3.18Ee02
  4.67E*01  5'.43E*00  3,2BE*00  2.106 + 00  1.22E*00  3.39E°01
  5.96E + 02  3'.24Et03  3.2&E*03  1.39E + 03  6'.74E*02  1.47Ef02
  4.93E*06  l'.70E*10  7,8JE*10  1.276*11  3.11E*11  7.89E»11
       H20 o  7.7fl
2,9889E*OS M8/ONCM
       FILTER
          7

         r.oi
         7'.28E*01
                                                                             2.28E=01
                                                                             2°.a2E*02
                                                                             1.7te*13
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                11.00      6'.18      tt.06      2.55       l'.«l       0.50
  SEC. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7.o5E*oi  s'.2aE*oo  S.OOE*OO  3.22E*oo   t.90E*oo   8.76e°oi
  DH/DLOGO (MG/PNCM)                                5.97E*02  3'.26E*03  3.32E*03  1.11E + 03   6.95E + 02   1.57E + 02
  DN/DLOGn (NO. PARTICLES/DNCMJ                     3.25E + 06  I.HE + IO  5.06E+10  S.IOE + IO   1.93E + H   11.466*11
                                                                             3.83E=01
                                                                             2.42E*02
                                                                             8.216*12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS APE 21 PEG C  AND 760MH HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0'.322     0.370     0.3(10      0.345      0.31U      8.314
  HOLE DIAMETERS RY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3630    0'.2«84    0,1722    0.1353     0.0925     0.0560     0.0560

-------
  AVCI.2   12-1-77  1737 •  18S7
  IMPACTC1R FLOHRATE n 0.027 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP =  O.JTN. OF HC
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY  a 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'..
  6*8. COMPOSITION fPERCENT)           CO? «  It]
  C4LC. MASS LOADING c 7.5262E.01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/ACH) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/oNCM) SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/oNcF) SMALLE" THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/OLOGD (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLE9/ONCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER • B
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  310.0 F a  is«.« c               SAMPLING  DURATION •  30,00
STACK TEMPERATURE »  Jio.o F a ua.a c
 STACK PRESSURE s 29.72 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  o   JOO.O MICROMETERS
07          CO s  0.00
      l'.2356E + 00 GR/ONCF
       SO        SI        32
       1         2         3
     7.22      «'.03      2.68
    25.99      6'.26      a.73
N2 « 73.81          02 •  7.38
    1.7222E+03 HG/ACM
    S3        Sa        S?
    156
  1.75      0.89      0,39
  2.08      l.2«      0.52
     1.73E + 03  «'.53E + 02  3,«1F*02  1.50E*02  8.94C + 01  3.75E + 01
   38'.82     22'.80     10. Tfl      S'.aS      2'.27      fl'.9«
     6.69E + 02  3'.93E*02  t.85E*02  9.36E + 01  3.91E + OJ  J,63E*01
     1.10E + OJ  6'.U5E + 0?  3.04E402  1.5UE + 02  6.42E + 01  2,67Et01
     2.92E-01  r.72E-01  6.08E.02  0.096-02  1.71E-02  7.10E-83
     a.60E-01  2'.82E-01  1.J3E-01  6.71E-02  2.80E-02  1.17E.02
     fl.fc3E + 01  5'.3<»E + 00  3.29E*00  2.17E*00  1.2SE*00  5.86E-01
     1.07E + 03  t'.79Ei03  1.93E + 03  8.12E + 02  3.0«e + 02  J,Q3E + 03
     8.92E*06  9'.59E*09  a.57E»!0  6'.72E+10  J.31E + 11  (I.IlEfll
       H20 •  7'.7«
Z,827«E»OS H6/BNCM
       FILTER
          7


         0'.37
         2.67E+01
                                            2.7JE-01
                                            5.68E+12
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                10.9«      fc',13       0.10       2.70       l.«0       0.6fl
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7.03E + 01  8'.19E*00   5.01E + 80   3.33E*00   l'.9aE*00   9,
-------
AVCI-3   12-2-77  1100 - 1130
IMPACTOR FLOWRATE a 0,029 ACFM
IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP a  O.UIN. OF HG
ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY « 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 e
CALC. MASS LOADING e 7'.T002E = 01 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/DNCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (MG/AC*) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM, (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (QR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                                                                    INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR NUMBER ° A
                                               IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  300.0 F a iaa.9 c              SAMPLING  DURATION a  30,00
                                               STACK TEMPERATURE a  300.0 F a |
-------
  AVCI.U   12-2-77  1510 • 1S10
  IMPACTOR FLOKRATE s 0.029 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE nROP =  O.UIN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY « z'.n GM/ru.cM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 B 10.35
  CALC. MASS LOADING = i'.2732E + oo GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX DUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/D"CF) SM4LLE« THAN 050
  GEO, MEAN DIA. CMJCROMETERS)
  OM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCAOE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER  •  8
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =  300.0 F = its.9 c              SAMPLING  DURATION  B   30,00
STACK TEMPERATURE =  300.0 F s IU6.9 C
 STACK PRESSURE e 28.99 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE niAMBTER  »   300.0  MICROMETERS
N2 = 75.17          02 o  8.39
    2.9136E+03 MG/ACM
S3
1
1.68
S.03
SI
5
0.85
1.11
S3
6
0,37
0,17
         CO c  0.00
   2.0239E+00 GR/DNCF
    SO        SI        S2
    1          2         3
  6.91      3'.87      2.57
 19.38     10'.33      6.59
  3.20E+OS  6'.69E + 02  1.276+02  1.966 + 02
30.97      16'.5?      7.31      3'.08      1.10
  9.02E + 02  l'.81E + 02  2.136 + 02  8.96E+01  3.22E + 01  1.30E + 01
  1.13E + 03  7'.65E + 02  3.396 + 02  1.126 + 02  5.126 + 01  2.07E + 01
  3.91E-01  2'.10E-01  9,316-02  3.926-02  1.116-02  5.TOE-03
  6.27E-01  3.306-01  1.486-01  6.226»02  2.24E-02  9.05E-03
  1.56E + 01  5'.1BE + 00  3.166 + 00  2.08E + 00  1.206+00  5.616-01
  1.95E + 03  2'.61E + 03  2.116 + 03  1.066 + 03  3.10E + 02  8.31E+01
  1.73E + 07  T.606+10  6.15E+10  9.92E + 10  1.52E + 11  3,976 + 11
                                                      0.«5
                                                                           H20  a   6.83
                                                                               MG/DNCM
                                                                           FILTER
                                                                             7


                                                                             0'.J2
                                                                             2'.07E + 01
                                                                             2.61E-01
                                                                             6'.88E + OI
                                                                             3.27E+12
            DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                10.51      5.89      3.9«       2.59       i.Jfl       0.61
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      6.89E+oi  7'.87E»oo  a.sis+oo   3.i9E+fto   i.87E+oo   9,osE-oi
  DM/DLOGn (MG/DNCM)                                1.96E + 03  2'.66E»03  2,a«E + 03   1.08E + 03   3.20F + 02   8.89E + 01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTKLES/DNCM)                     1.1«6 + 07  r.O«E*10  1,176 + 10   6.31E+10   9.11E + 10   2.29E + 11
                                                                             1.326*01
                                                                             6.88E+01
                                                                             1.63E+12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.32?     0'.322     0,362      0.353      0.357      0,353      0.353
  HOLE OlAMETfRS RY STAGE (CF.NT IMfTpRS)             0.3616    0.2U72    0.1759     0.1367     O.OR98     0.0567     0.0567

-------
  AVCI-5   12-2-77  1702 - 1732
  IMPACTOR FLOWR4TE a 0,029 ACFM
  IMPACT"" PRESSURE DROP «=  O.OIN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY B a'.a? GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION fPERCENT)           C02 «• ic',23
  CALC.  MASS LOADING a 8.8910E..01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ONCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/oNcF) SMALLER THAN oso
  CEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (M6/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/ONCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIEP BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER  -  A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE *  300.0 F B toe.9 c              SAMPLING  DURATION  »   10.00  MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE a  300.0 f a 106.9 C
 STACK PRESSURE = 28.99 IN, OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  a   300.0 MICROMETERS
N2 a 75.07          02 •  8.39
    2.0306E+03 MG/ACM
         CO s  0.00
   T.0133E + 00 GR/ONCF
    SO        SI        32
    1          2         3
  6.98      3'.90      2.55
 25.63     lO'.lU      8.11
  1.66E + 03  6'.57E + 02  S.2SE+08
08'.69      28.39     12.15
  9.91E+02  5'.78E + 08  2.07E+08  9.61E + 01  S.10E+01   1.181 + 01
  1.57E + 03  9'.18E + 02  3.93E + 02  l.SSE + 02  0.99E+01   1.88E + 01
  0.33E-01  2'.S2E = 01  1.08E°01  o'.20Eo02  1.37E = 02   9,16E«03
  6.88E°01  O'.OIE'O]  1.72E-01  6.68E.62  2,18E°0?   8,31E>03
  0.58E + 01  S'.22E + 00  3.15E + 00  8.01E + 00  1.17E + 00   5,166 = 01
  1.02E + 03  2'.60E + 03  2.8UE + 03  1.17E + 03  3.89E + 02   6,952 + 01
  8.93Et06  l'.50E + 10  7.606+10  1.21E + 11  8.03E + 11   0.25E + 11
S3
0
1.59
3.71
2.00E+0
'.72
S4
5
0.86
1.59
2 1.03E+02
l'.5«'
85
6
0.31
0.08
. 3.11
0'.58
                                                                           H20  • .  6.83
                                                                    3.2301E+01  M8/DNCM
                                                                           FILTER
                                                                              7

                                                                   \
                                                                             0'.29
                                                                             1.88E+01
                                                                             6.20E+01
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050-(MICROMETERS)                                10.57      5.93      3.90      2.05      1.36       0.52
  GEO.  MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      6.91E + 01  7'.92E + 00  0.81E + 00  3.09E+00  1.82E + 00   e.OOEoOl
  DH/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                1.02E + 03  2'.62E + 03  2.87E + 03  l'.19E+03  0.016 + 02   7.00E + 01
  DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                     5.88E+06  .T.01E+10  0.90E+10  7.73E+10  1.26E+11   2.00E+11
                                                                             3.67E-01
                                                                             6.20E+01
                                                                             2'.8ie»12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of PSI 6Y STAGE                      0.322     0'.322     0.570     O.SflO      0'.3«5      0,310      O.S10
  HOLE DIAMETERS pY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3630    0'.2080    0.1722    0.1353     0.0925     0,0560     0,0960

-------
  AVCI.6   12-5-77  1200 - 1?30
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE e 0.024 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE HRDP =  o.aiw. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
  CAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 =  P.30
  CALC. MASS LOADING B 1.16U6E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/oNcF) SMALLER THAN oso
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MILOMETERS)
  OM/OLOGO (MG/ONCM)
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  •  A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  285.o F a iuo.6 c              SAMPLING DURATION  »   30.00
STACK TEMPERATURE s  2S5.0 F « lflfl.6 C
 STACK PRESSURE c 28.75 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE OIAMgTER •  JOO.O MICROMETERS
         CO a  O'.OO
   T.83J9E + 00 GR/ONCF
    SO        31
    1          2
  7.65      «'.2B
 38.88      4'.97
  3.03E + 03  3.87E + 02
27. 6(1      18.62
                                 N2 B 7fl.85          02 •  6.83
                                     2.66U9E+03 MG/ACM
32
3
2.80
5. 65
S3
a
1.75
2.31
84
5
0.96
1.44
35
6
0,35
0,36
B.17
f.21
                                  3. 88
     7.42E+02  0.96E«02  2.18E+02  l.OJE+02  3.21Ct01  l.«SE*01
     1.17E + 03  7'.81E*02  3,a3E»02  1.63E + 02  5.06E*01  2,Z6E*Ol
     3.2«E-01  2'.17E-01  9.51E-02  «.52E«02  1.40E-02  6.27f.03
     5.11E-01  3'.ttlE-01  l.SOE'Ol  7.11E-02  2.I1E-02  Q.87E.OJ
     «.79f + 01  g'.72E*00  3,«6E*00  2.21E + 00  1.29E + 00  5.77E.OI
     1.90E^03  l'.53EtO^  2.38E + 03  8.8JE + 02  «.28E*02  6.39E + 01
               6.90E»OP  «. 836*10  6'.85E4lO  1.66E»11  2.79E»11
                              H20 •  7.0U
                       4.1966E+03 MB/DNCM
                              CILTER
                                 T

                                0'.Z9
                                2.26E+01
                                2'.fl6E.01
                                T'.50E + 01
                                fl'.22E»12
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                11.58      6.50      4.27      2.69       1.50       0,58
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7.23E + 01  8'.68E + 00  5.27E + 00  3.30E*00   2.01E*00   9.31E-01
  OM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)                                1.90E + 03  l'.55E + 03  2.«1E*03  6.9BE»02   a.OOE*02   6.80E + 01
            Nn. PARTICLES/DMCM1                      
-------
  AyCI.7   13.5-77  1(114 - 1141
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE a o,02« ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE nROP o  0.2IN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY a 2'.27 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 B
  CALC.  MA3S LOADING • 2.0787E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT of MASS SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/DNCM)  SMALLE" THAN DSO
  CUM, (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 030
  CUM. (QR/DNCF)  SMALLER THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLE3/DNCM)
                       INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOH NUMBER ° e
  IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE »  285,o P « iao.6 c              SAMPLING DURATION =  so.oo  MIN
  STACK TEMPERATURE »  285.o f a 140.6 c
   STACK PRESSURE o 28.75 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER »  JOO.O MICROMETERS
9.30          CO B  0'. 00
        3'.273S£ + 00 GR/DNCP
N2 a 70,83          03
    4.7569E+03 MG/ACM
8.65


7
75
5
81'.
1
1
4
7
4
3
2
SO
1
.59
.34
.84E+03
99
.05E+03
.65E+03
,57E=Ol
.20E°Oi
.77E+01
.66E+03
.B4E+07


4
6
4
15.
7
1
3
5
5
1
8


•
•
•
SI
2
24
27
86E*02
50
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
37E+02
16E+03
22E=01
07E=01
67E+00
92E+03
88E+09
S3
3
2.82
7.69
5.96E*02
7.54
3.59E«a2
5.65E*02
1.37EP01
a.47E=01
3.46E+00
3,38Ei03
6,a8E«10


1
4
J
2.
1
2
5
9
2
1
1
S3
4
.85
.50
,49E*fll
88
,37E»02
.16E*02
,98E=02
.42E-02
.28E+00
.90E4.03
.34E+11
84
5
0.94 0
1.86 0
1.44E»OS 4
0'.95 0'.
4.53E«Ot 1
7.14E+01 8
1.98£008 7
3.12E-02 1
1.32E+00 6
4.93E+02 1
1.81E+11 4
85
6
.41
.57
,48E*01
36
.785^01
,7ie«oi
,53Eo01
.19E-OJ
,2SE°Oi
,2SE«02
,26E*ll
H20 «  T.Ofl
                                                                            FILTER
                                                                                7

                                                                               O.J5
                                                                               2'.71E*OJ
                                                                               2.93EB01
                                                                               9',02E»01
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS A«E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                11.49      6'.44      4.11      2.80      1.48      0,68
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      ?.?ie+oi  e'.60Etoo  5.27E«oo  S.SOE+OO  2.o5E«oo  i.ooe+oo
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                3.66E + OJ  l'.94E + 03  3.42E + 03  1.93E + 03  5.08E»02  1,31E*02
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                     1.87E+07  5.81E+09  4.46E+10  8.60E+10  l.lSE+11  2.49E+11
                                                                               4.T9E°01
                                                                               9*.02E«01
                                                                               1.56E+12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS APE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0.362     0.353     0.357     0,353     0,353
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    0'.2472    0.1759    0.1367    0,0898    0,0567    0,8567

-------
  AVCI-6   12-6-77  1055 - 1125
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE = 0,026 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE nROP =  0.3IN. (IF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           CO? c
  CALC. MASS LOADING * 1.97U6E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  DSO (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MQ/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNcM) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM, (6R/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (GR'oNcF) SMALLER THAN oso
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  OM/DLOGD (MG/DNC")
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     INLFT SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  •  A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE o  205.0 F » i6
                  0.00
7.56
                           S2
                           5
                         2,69
                         7,20
                              N2 B 78.00          02
                                  «.5186E+03 MG/ACM
                                  83        SI        S5
                                  156
                                1.66      0.92      0.33
                                3.«9      1.18      0.52
  5.65E+03  6'.27E + 02  5.28Et02  2.53E+02  8.5«E»01  3,76E»01
2T.51     12'.80      S.«T      1.96      0.77      0.25
  9.72E+02  5'.79E + 02  2.17E + 02  8.86E + 01  S.50E»01  i.UE + 01
  1.55E + 03  9'.21E + 02  3.9ttE*02  1.«1E + 02  5.57E + 01  1.81E + 01
  U.25E-01  2'.53E-01  l.OBE-01  3.87E-02  1.53E-02  «.9TE-03
  6.77E-01  a.OSE-01  1.72E-01  6.17E-02  Z.aOE-02  7.91E.03
  U.70E + 01  5'.51E + 00  3.33E*00  2.13E + 00  1.2aE*80  S.09E-01
  3.51E + 03  2'.«8E+03  2.86E*03  1.2aE + 03  S.20E + 02  8,«7E*01
                      6.50E+10  1.08E+11  l.«2E+ll
       H20 B  5.06
7,|959Et03 MG/ONCM
       FILTER
          T

         0.25
                                                                             2.J3E-01
                                                                             6.01E+01
                                                                             a,OOE*i2
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETFRS A»E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                                11.17      6'.27      a.12      2.5o       i.a«       0,55
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7,10E + 01  8'.37E + 00  5.08E + 00  3.27E*00   1.93E + 00   8,91E«01
  OM/DLOGD (MG/ONCM)                                3.51E + 03  2'.50E + 03  2,89£*03  1.26E + 03   3.jaE + 02   9.05E»01
  DN/nLOGD (NO. PAPTICLES/ONCH)                     1.P7E + 07  8'.15E + 00  «.21E»10  6.89E*tO   8.86E + 10   J.U5E + 11
                                                                             1.90E«Ot
                                                                             6'.01E»01
                                                                             T.93EM2
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONniTIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE ROOTS nF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0,37o     0.3(10     0.3«5      0,31«      0,310
  HOLE DIAMfTERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             (1.J630    0.2«8«    0.1722    0.1353    0.0925     0,0560     0.0560

-------
  AVCI.9   12-6-77  IJll • 1311
  IMPACTOR FLONRATE B 0,026 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP a  0.31". OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DFNSITY & 2'.27 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION fPERCENT)           C02 B
  CALC. MASS LOADING a 1.0805E*00 6R/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS {MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/oNcM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM, CGR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLE" THAN 050
  6EO. MEAN DIA. {MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCMJ
  DN/DLOGD (NO'. PA"TICLE8/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED PRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER - B
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =  295,o r a 106.1 c              SAMPLING DURATION B  so.oo
STACK TEMPERATURE a  295.0 F B 106.1 C
 STACK PRESSURE o 28.33 IN, Of HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER a  JOO.O MICROMETERS
                                 N2 a 78.00          02 B  7.S6
                                     2,«725E*03 MG/ACM
32
3
2. 72
6.00
S3
0
1.78
3.17
SO
3
0.91
r.«t
35
6
0,19
0.03
9.OS          CO a  0.00
        1.7207E*00 GR/DNCF
         SO        81
         1          2
       T.33      fl',09
      37.31      5.25
       2.70E+03  3*.80E + 02
     31.02      21.76
       7,77g*02  5'.38E*02  2,07E*02  1,03E*02  3.91E«01  1,932*01
       1.20E*03  8'.57E*02  3,90E*02  1.60G*02  6.226*01  S,11E*01
       3.39E°01  2'.3SE = 01  1.08E = 01  0.5lEo02  1.71E»02  S.SOEoOJ


       0.69E + 01  5'.07E*00  3,306*00  2.SOE + 00  1.87E*00  5,97E«01
       1.68E + 03  1.50E + 03  2.62E + 03  l'.20E*03  3.08E*02  8,38E + 01
       1.37E + 07  7'.70E*09  5.9JE + 10  9.82E + 10  1.03E*11  S080E*11
Ifl'.OO
a. 17
                                             1.086*02  S,lie*01
                                            l'.58      0'.T9
                                        H20  B   5.06
                                 3.937
-------
  AVCI-10  12-6-77  1500 - 15SO
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE a 0.026 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP =  0.3IN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION {PERCENT)           C02 e  9.U§
  CALC.  MASS LOADING t 1.3770E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNcM) SMALLE" THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
  OM/DLOSO (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTJCLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR NUMBE"  «•  »
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE e  2'5.0 F a 1*16.1 C              SAMPLING DURATION  •   50,00  MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE =  295.0 F a i«6.i c
 STACK PRESSURE c 28.JJ IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER •  JOO.O  MICROMSTCR8
N2 B 78.00
                                                     02
                                                           7.5h
                                     3.1509E+03 MG/ACM
83
«
I."
3.68
31
5
0.92
1.70
85
6
0.33
0,33
         CO a  0.00
   2'.1928E + 00 GR/OMCF
    SO        SI        32
    1          2         3
  7.3<>      «'.13      2.70
 as.26      7.41      7,38
  3.51E+03  S'.S8E + 02  5.36E+Q2  2.67E+02
30.12      19.39      8.70      3.37      O'.9t
  9.U9E+02  6.11E+02  2,7«E+02  1.06E+02  2.87E+01  1.37C+01
  1.51E+03  *'.TSl*Oi  «,37E+08  1.69E + 02  U.58E + 01  2.18E + 01
  U.15E-01  2>7E-01  1.20E-01  1.65E-02  1.26E-02  5.98E.OJ
  6.hOE-01  a'. 25E-01  1.91C-01  7.10E-02  2.00E-02  9.33E.03
  4.71Et01  5.32E+On  3.JUE+00  2.13E+00  1.24E+00  5.51E-01
  2.18E + 03  2'.13E + 03  2,90Et03  l.IlE + OS  a.681 + 02  5,ttOE + 01
  1.76E+07  1.07E+10  6.57E+10  1.1UE+11  2.05E+11  2,721+11
                                                      0.«3
       H20 •  5.06
5.0179E+03 MG/DNCM
       FILTER
          7

         0.30
         2.18E+01
                                                                             2.33E-01
                                                                             7'.2aE»01
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                11.1'      6.28      «.13      2.60       l.aa       0,55
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7.11E + 01  8'.38E + 00  5.09E + 00  3.27E + 00   1.93E + 00   B.93E-01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                2.18E + 03  2'.15E + 03  2.98E + 03  1.33E»03   a.82E + 02   5.77C*01
  DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                     1.16E + 07  6'.96E + 09  1.25E + 10  7.25EtlO   1.27E»11
                                                                             1.91E.01
                                                                             2', 3 IE* 12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of PSI BY STARE                      O.J22     0.322     0.370     0.300     0.3«5      0,31«      0,3l«
  HOLE niA"F.TERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3630    0.2
-------
  AVCI-13  12.7-77  1316 - 13«6
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE o 0.026 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP s  0.3IN. OF HG
  ASSUMEH PARTICLE OEMSITY c 2'.27 GM/CU.CM.
  GAB COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 B  9.07
  CALC'.  MASS LOADING o 7.8609E-01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  DSO (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM, PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 090
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN D30
  CUM. (HG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN D30
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUH. (GR/oNcF) SMALLE" THAN DSO
  SEC. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER  •>  A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE B  295.0 F a 106.1 c              SAMPLING DURATION  a   so.oo  MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE e  2«.0 F a 106.1 C
 STACK PRESSURE c 28,93 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  B  JOO.O  MICROMETERS
       SO
       1
     7.32
    26.33
N2 B 77.62
1.
SS
a
1.67
2.«1
7989E»03


0.
0.
MG/
so
5
91
81
02 B
ACM
SS
6
O.SS
0,23
         CO B  o.OO           Ng B 77.62          02 B  7.57
              GR/DNCF
              SI        32
              2         3
            «'.09      2,67
            fl'.97      5,11
  1.80E*03  S'.06E + 02  3.56E+02
30'. 09     22.12      9.01      3'. 01
  6.20E*02  3'.98E + 02  1.69E+02
  9.66E+02  6'.20E«02  2.6«E«02  9.55E + 01  3'.90E + 01  ?.30E<-01
  2.71E-01  r.7ae»oi  7.39E.02  2.68E»02  1,10E»02  6.03E.03
  4.22E°01  2.71E-01  l.lSEoQl  0.17E=02  1.71Eo02  1,01E=OS
  U.69E*01  g.OTEtOO  3.31E*00  2.11E*00  1.23E»00  9.07e«01
  1.11E + OJ  l'.37Et03  1.93E^03  6.22E*02  2.11E«02  3.62E + 01
  9.31E*06  7.05Et09  0,09E«10  7.3SE+10  9.616*10  1.86EM1
                                             5.65E401  l,60E*Ol
                                            l'.S9      0',82
                                             ?.51E*01
       H20 a  S.so
2.8017E*03 MG/ONCM
       FILTER
          7

         o'.ss
         8'.JOE + 01
                                                                             7'.6fle»01
                                                                             5'. 1
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                11.08      6.22      0.09      2.57       1.03       0,93
  CEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7,oeE+oi  e'.3iE->oo  5.005*00  3.aoE*oo   i.92E*oo   B.SSE»OI
  DM/DLOGD (MQ/DNCM)                                1,10E*03  l'.38E + 03  1.95E + OJ  8.37E*02   2.21E»02   5,86E*01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                     6.10E+06  0.61E+09  2.91E»10  0.68E+10   5.98E*10   1.06E+11
                                                                             3.88E«01
                                                                             7.60E*01
                                                                             2'.«9E»12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEG C  AMD 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of PSI "V STAGE                      0.322     fl'.S22     0.370     0.300      0.305      O.S10      0.310
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CfNTIMfTERS)             0.3630    O'.208fl    0,1722    0.1353     0.0925     0,0560     0,0560

-------
  AVCI-1U  (2.7.77  155« • 162U
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE B O.P26 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP =  O.JIM, of HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY B 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 e
  CALC. MASS LOADING * tt.9898E.01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE TNOE* NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGF
  CUM, PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MQ/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM, (QR/oNcF) SMALLF" THAN oso
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  OM/OLOGD (MG/DNCMJ
  ON/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                       INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  •  B
  IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  295.0 F B 146.1 C              SAMPLING DURATION  B   18,06  MIN
  STACK TEMPERATURE *  295.0 F * i46.i c
   STACK PRESSURE * 28.93 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER «  300.0  MICROMETERS
9.47          COs  0.00
        T'.7T16E-01 GR/DNCF
         SO        SI        S2
         I          2         3
       7.32      4.08      2.72
      13.85      S'.B4      4,31
N2 a 77,62          02 «  7.57
    1.141BE+03 MS/ACM
    83        Sa        89
    456
  1.78      O.'l      0,39
  1.73      0.86      0,31
       9.77E + 02  2'.71E + 02  3.04Eto2  1.226*02  6.06E + 01  2,19E*01
     45'.OB     29.86     ls',77      5.91      2'.50      l'.27
       5.15E + 02  3'.«1E + 02  1,«6E*02  6.75E + 01  2,85E*01  i,45E*01
       8.02Etn2  5'.31E + 02  2.27E»02  1.05E + 02  4.44E + 01  2.262*01
       2.25E-01  1.09E-01  6.37E-OJ  2.95E-02  1.25E.02  6.S3E-OS
       3.50E-01  3.32E-01  9.92E-02  4.S9E>02  1.94E-02  9.66E-OJ
       4.69E + 01  S.il?E*00  3.33E*00  J.20E + 00  1.27E + 80  5.98E-01
       6.06E*02  1.07E+OJ  1.72C*03  6.62E+02  2.07E+02  6.05E+01
       «.95E*06  5.51E+00  3.91E*10  5.20E+10  8.S2E+10  2.38E+11
H20 •  5.34
FILTER
   T


  0.32
  2.J6E+01
                                           2'.7»Eo01
                                           7.80E+01
                                           2'.91E»12
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS A*E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO. THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  R50 (MICROMETERS)                                11.08      6.21      U.15      2.74       1.42       0,65
  GEO, MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      7.0BE + 01  S'.SOE + OO  5.08E»00  3.J7E + 00   1.97E + 00   9.60E-01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                6.06E + 02  1.08E*03  1.74E + 03  6.73E*02   2.UE + 02   6,42E*01
  DN/DLOGn (NO. PARTICLES/OHCM)                     3.27E*06  J.60E*09  2.53E+10  3.35E+10   5.31E+10   1,38E*11
                                                                               7'.50E»01
                                                                               i.aeE+i2
NORMAL (EklGINEF.RIflG STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARF 21 DEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0'.J2?     0.362      0.353      0.357      0,353      0.353
  HOLE DIAMETERS B* STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    0'.2«72    0.1759     0.1367     0.0698     0.0567     0.0567

-------
  AVCI-15  12.7.77  1734 • 180
-------
  AVCI.J6  12.8.77  11?7 - 1157
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE B 0.03" ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP =  O.ltN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY * 2'.27 GM/CU.CH.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 o
  CALC.  MASS LOATING = 9.629BE.01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNcM) SMALLER THAN 030
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN D50
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/OLOGD (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTKLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER • B
IMPACTOR TFMPERATURE 8  JlO.O F B 134.4 C              SAMPLING DURATION a  56,00
STACK TEMPERATURE B  310.0 F B 154.4 c
 STACK PRESSURE B 28.76 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER o  300.0 MICROMETERS
                                 N2 » 76.46          02 »  9.85
                                     2.2036E*03 MG/ACM
                                     S3        SO        83
                                     a         5         6
                                   1.66      0.84      0.36
                                   2.10      0.93      0,28
7.51          CO •  0.00
        1.5S25E+00 GR/DNCF
         SO      .SI        32
         1         2         3
       6.86      3.82      2,54
      40.24      6.82      5.40
       2.55E+03  4'.31E + 02  3,Q2E*02  1.3JE»02  6.01E + 01  1,77E*01
     28'. 3S     16.20      6'.59      2.83      1.16      0.66
       6,25E^02  3'.57e>02  1.4SE + 02  6.28E + 01  2.5SE + 01  l,ttSE»01
       1.01E + 03  5'.76Et02  2.S4E + 02  1.01E + 02  4.HE + 01  2.34E + 01
       2.73E-01  r.56E-01  6,J4E«02  2.74E-02  1.11E-02  6.34E«03
       4.40E-01  2.52E"01  1.02E-01  4.4JE-02  1.80E-02  l,02EoO?
       4.54E + 01  5'.12E + 00  3.12E*00  2.05E*00  i.l8E»00  5,a9E-01
       1.3SE>03  1.70E + 03  1.92e«03  7.17E + 02  2.03E + 02    6.16
S,5386E*03 MG/ONCM
       FILTER
          T

         0,17
         2.S4E+01
                                                                             7',78E»01
                                                                             3.998*12
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                10,40      5.82      3,89      a.56      1.32      0,60
  GEO,  MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                       6.86E*01  7.78E+00  4.76E+00  3.15E+00  1.84E»00  8,908-01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)          •                       1.55E+03  T.71E+OS  1.95E+03  7.30E»02  2.10E*02  5,142*01
  ON/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                      9.21E+06  6.95E+OQ  3.45E+10  4.4aE«10  6.43E+10  1.392*11
                                                                             a.tiE-oi
                                                                             7',78E*01
                                                                             1,96E*12
pgORMAL (FwGINFERlNG STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 76QMM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.32?     0.322     0.362     0.353     0.357     0,353      0,353
  HOLE DTAMETfRS BY STAGE (CF.NT I METE"»S)              0,3616    0'.2472    0,1759    0.1367    0.0898    0.0567     0.0567

-------
  AVCI.17  12-8.77  1033 • 1503
  IMPACTOR-FLOWRATE » o.oso ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP °  O.UIN. OF HC
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY ». z'.zi GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           CO? a
  CALC. MASS LOADING a T.1040E-01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  DSO-(MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/ONCM/8TAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (MG/DNcM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. CGR/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (GR/DNcF) SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DL06D (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                       INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  •  A
  IMPACTOH TEMPERATURE a  310.0 F • iso.o c              SAMPLING DURATION  •   30,09  MIN
  STACK TEMPERATURE «  110.0 F • 154.4 c
   STACK PRESSURE B 28.76 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER •  300.0  MICROMETERS
7.51          CO •  0.00
        l'.1453E + 00 GR/ONCF
         80        SI        82
         1         2         3
       6.90      3.85      2.51
      27.48      6'.OS      4.33
N2 * 76.06          02 •  9.85
    1.6256E+03 MG/ACM
    S3        SO        85
    a         5         6
  l'.S7      O'.SS      0.30
  1.90      0.83      0,26
       1.74E*03  S'.83E+02  2.87E+02  1.20E+02  5.2SE+01  l,6«E*Ol
     33'.67     19.07      B',13      J'.SS      f.Sfl      O'.VZ
       5tfl7E»02  3.10E»6e  1.32E+02  5.7TE*01  2.S1E«01  l.«9E+Ol
       8.62E+02  S'.OOE+02  3.13E+02  9.30E+01  fl.05E»01  2.00E+91
       2.39E-01  i'.35E>01  5.T6E-02  2.52E-02  1.10E-02  6.516-03
       3.86E-01  2'. 18E-01  9.32E-02  fl.06E.02  l.rTE-02  1.09E.02
       «.55E*01  5'. 16EfOO  3.11S+00  1.98E*00  l.HE+00  5.05E-01
       1.06E+03  1.9ie*03  1.55E*03  5.85E»02  1.98E*02  3.64E+01
       9.48E406  9'.2SE*09  1.32E + 10  6.29E+10  1.08E*11  2.38E*11
       H20 •  6. IS
2.6208E*03 MB/ONCM
         0.36
         2'.aoE»01
                                            2.12E-01
                                            T.99E401
                                            7.05E*12
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                                10.96      5'.87      3,88      2,«2      1.34      0.31
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      6.ssE>oi  7'.83E*oo  O,TSE»OO  3,osE»oo  i.80E«oo  §.25E.oi
  OM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                1.06E+03  l'.52E*03  1.57E + 03  5.96E+02  2.04E + 02  3,91EtOl
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                     6.25E + 06  6'.06E»0<)  2.79E+10  4.0oEtlO  6.68E + 10  1.33E + H

NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0'.322     0.370     0.340     6.345     0,114      0.314
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3630    0/.2484    0.1722    0.13S3    0.0925    0,0360     0.0560
                                                                               3.S9E.OI
                                                                               7.«9E*01
                                                                               3.J9E+12

-------
  AVCI.|R  12.8.77  1600 - 1630
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE s 0.030 ACFM
  IMPACTOP PRESSURE r>ROP =  O.UlN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY s 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 «
  CALC. MASS LOADING a 7.2I55E.01 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (GR/oNcF) SMALLER THAN oso
  GEO. MFAN nu. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR  NUMBER  -  8
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE «  310.0 r » isi.u c              SAMPLING DURATION  «   Jotoo
STACK TEMPERATURF. •  sio.o f - isa.a c
 STACK PRESSURE a 26.76 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER •  300.0 MICROMETERS
7. 51           CO »  0.00
        l'.163SE + 00 GR/DNCF
                   SI
                   2
                 J.82
                 3.89
                                 N2 B 76.06          02 •  9.85
                                     1.6512E*03 "G/ACM
                           32
                           3
                         2.5U
                         fl. 72
  33
  1
1.66
1.83
                       S4
                       5
                     0.84
                     0.76
                       35
                       6
                     0,36
                     0,29
7'.68
3.33
                                              T.52
                                                      0.8J
    so
    1
  6.86
 30.24
  1.91E+03
28.la      18.89
  U.65E+02  3.12E*02  1.27E+02  5.«9E»01  Z.51E+01  1.37E+01
  7.09E+02  5'.03E + 02  ?,OaE + 02  8.86E + 01  0.05E + 01  2.21E + 01
  2.03E-01  1.36E-01  5.S4E-02  2.00E-02  1.10E-02  6.00E-03
  3.27E-01  2'.20E-01  8.935-02  3.87E-02  1.776-02  9.68E-03
  U.54E+01  5.12E+00  3.12E+00  2.05E+00  1.18E+00  5.09E-01
  1.17E + 03  9'.70E + 02  1.68E + 03  6.2SE*02  1.63E + 02  4,972 + 01
  1.05E + 07  6'.07E + 09  1.6TE + 10  6.07E»10  8.33E»10  2.53E + 11
H20 •  6.16
    MO/DNCM
FILTER
   7

  0.35
  2.21E»01
                                                                             2'.5flE-01
                                                                             7',J5E + 01
                                                                             3.78E+12
            DIAMF.TF.RS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                10. HO      5'.82      3.89      2.56       1.32       0,60
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                      6.86E+oi  T'.TSE+OO  «.76c+oo  S.ISE+OO   i.soe+oo   8,90E-oi
  OM/OLOGD (MG/ONCM)                                1.ITE + 03  9'.77e»02  1.70E + 03  6.J68*02   1.68E*02   5.5ZE»01
  ON/DLOGD (NO. PAPTICLES/DNCM)                     6.92F+06  3.96E+09  3.02E+10  3.87E+10   S.lSEtlO   {,««E*11
                                                                             U.23E-01
                                                                             7.33E«01
                                                                             r.ese+12
NORMAL (FNGINEERlNG STANDARD) CONOITIn«JS APE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG.
 •SQUARE  ROOTS OF PS! BY STAGE                    ,  0.322     0.322     0.362     0.353     0.357      0.353      0,353
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    0.2fl72    0.1T59    0.1367    0.0898     0,0567     0,0567

-------
  AVCO.J    11.30-77   1502  «  1702
  IMPACTOR  FLO*R*TE  a  0.636  ACFM
  IMPA'cTnR  PRESSURE  DROP  =  Z. UN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED  PARTICLE  DFNSITV o a'.ar  GM/CU.CM,
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02 i
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING D 1.3209E.02  GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  DSO  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/D3CM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF  MASS SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER  THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (GR/oNcF) SMALLER  THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD  (NO. PARTICLE8/ONCM)
                         OUTLET  SAMPLE    U.  OF  *.  MARK III  SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO. o D
    IMPACTOR  TEMPERATURE  a   170.0  F  «  76.7  C              SAMPLING DURATION D 180,00 MIN
    STACK  TEMPERATURE  =   170.0 F o  76.T c
     STACK PRESSURE  a  29.05 IN.  OF HG     MAX.  PARTICLE DIAMETER »   50.0 MICROMETERS
  6.72          CO  «   0.00
          l'.6844E-02  GR/DNCF
   SI        32    .    S3        84
   1         2         3         8
 7'.10      7.08      3.19      1.88
33'.73     13.38     13.40      3.22
                                     N2 • 73.97          02
                                         3.0226E+0!  MG/ACM
                                           85
                                           5
                                         0.66
                                         0.97
  86
  6
0.59
0,31
'  15.37

   87
   7
 0.18
 0.16
 1.99E«01  7,90E*00  7.91e»00  1.90E*00  S.7aE»01  1.8SE«>01  9.7aEo02
08.37     27.89      7.38      2.a5      0.96      0,88      0.83
 i'.a6E«01  8.fl3B+00  Z.JSE + OO  7.016 = 01  2.90E°01  l,«5Eo01  6.87Eo02
 1.86E+01  1.07E+01  2.eaE»00  9,uaEo01  3.70E»01  1.83E°01  8.76E«02
 6.39e°03  3,68Eo03  9.7«E=OU  3.24^=00  1.27E=04  6.34E-OS  3.00Eo05
 8.13E-OJ  4.70E»03  1.2«E=03  4.13Eo04  1.62E=04  8.086=05  3.8SEo03
 t.88E*01  7.07E+00  a.7a£*00  2.02E+00  9.17E-01  S,07Eo01  g.SOEoOl
 2.336*01  2.22E + 03  2.30E + 01  4.78e + 00  2.00e*00  8.186 = 01  Z.llEoOi
        H20 a  3.94
 J.8545E+01 MG/DNCM
FILTER
   8

 0.13
 8.76E°02
                    2.9ie«01
 2.95E*06  5.30Et09  1.82E + 08  8.90E«08  2.18E + 09  3.27E*0<>  1.465*10  2.79E*11
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK  GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                         10.74     10.66      4.83      1.97      1.04      0.64      0.25
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)               2.84E+01   1007E*01   7.19E+00  3.09E+00  l.aje*00  8.12Eofll  S.^SCoOl  l.VOEoei
  DM/DLOGD (MQ/DNCM)                         2.3SE*01   2.23E*03   Z.31E + 01  4,8SE*00  2.06E*00  8.71E=01  2,36E = 01  2.91E<>01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PA"TIcLES/DNCM)             i.95E*06   3,a8E+09   1.19E+08  3,iaE*08  1.33E+09  3,11E»09  7.29E»09  t.06E*ll
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21  DEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE  ROOTS 0^ PSI BY STAGE              0.144     0.330     0.371      0.319     0.321     0.389     0.354
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)     1.8237    0.5743    0.2512    0.0793    0.0495    0.0330    0.0229

-------
           11.10.77  1502 - 1702
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE 8 0.656 ACFM
  IMPACTOP PRESSURE DROP a  2.1IN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27 GM/CU.CM'.
                                                                  OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF W. MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO. • 0
                                             IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE •  i70.o F »  76.7 c              SAMPLING DURATION • 120,00 M
                                             STACK TEMPERATURE o  170.0 F »  76.7 c
                                              STACK PRESSURE o 29.05 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER »
                                              SI
                                              1
                                            7.10

                                           13'.73
GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 s  6.72
CALC'. MASS LOADING e 1.3209E-02 GH/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
D50 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/DSCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACP) SMALLE" THAN D50
CUM. (GR/RNCF) SMALLE" THAN D50
CEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
DN/DLOGD (NO'. PARTICLES/ONCM)
                                                                                N2 » 71,97          02 » 15.17
                                                                                    3.0226E*01 MG/ACM
S4
4
1.28
3.22
85
5
0.66
0.97
36
6
0,39
0,11
87
7
0.14
0.16
                CO a  0.00

          l'.6844E-02 GR/DNCF

             32        S3
             2         1
           7.Oil      1,19

          13.38     13.40      3.22      0.97      0,11      0.16      0.15
 1.99E+01   7.90E+00  7.91S+00  1.90E+00  5.74E-01  1.656=01  9.74E-02  8.76E-02

as.17     27.89      7.38      2,45      0.96      0.48      0.23

 f.46E*01   8.43E+00  2.23E*00  T.fllE-Ol  2.906-01  l.flSe-Ol  6.87E.02
 1.86E+01   1.07E+01  2.84E+00  9.44E-01  3.70E-01  1.85E»01  8.76E.02
 6.39E-03   3.68E.03  9,74E>04  1.24E-04  1.27E«04  6.1«Eo05  3.00E-OS
 fl.lSE-03   4.70E-03  1.24E.01  «.13E-0«  1.62E-04  8.08E-05  3.83E.05

 1.88E+01   7.07E»00  4.7«E+00  2.02E*00  9.17E-01  5.07E-01  2.30E-01  9.57E-02
 ?.15E*01   J.22E+03  2.30E+01  a.76E+00  2.00E«6o  8.18E-01  2.1ie»01  2.91Eo01
 2.95E+06   5.30E+09  1.82E*08  4.90Et08  2.18Ef09  5.27E«09  1.46E+10  2.79E+11
so.o MICROMETERS
         H20 a  1°,94
  1.83aSE*Ol MG/ONCM
 FILTER
AERODYNAMIC OIAMETFRS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNS DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                        10.74     10.66      4.85     'l,97      1.04      0,64      0,23
  SEO, MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)               2.8"E+01  1.07E+01  7.19E+00  3.09E+00  l.flJE+00  8.12E-01  3.9SE-01  l,TflE«01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                        2.S5E+01  2.23E+OJ  2.Jie+01  4.83E+00  2.06E*00  8.71E.01  2.J6C.01  2.91E-01
  ON/DLOGn (Np. PA"TICLES/DNCMJ              I.95E + 06  1.48E + 09  1.19E*08  1.14E*08  1.15E»09  3.11E + 09  7.29E*09  1.06SM1
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 "EG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE              0.144     0.330     0.371     0,319     0.321     0,389     0,354

  HOLE DlAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      1.8217    0.574!    0.2512    0.0791    0.0495    0.0330    0,0229

-------
  AVCO-2   12-01-77   1502  •  1800
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE  B 0,615  ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE  DROP =  2.0IN.  OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27  GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENTJ            C02
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING e 8.9610E.03  GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  8TAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/D8CM/ST&GE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER  THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (MG/DNCM)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (GR/ACF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO, MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  OM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
  DN/OLOGD (NO.  PARTICLE8/ONCM)
                         OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF M. MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR HO, a A
    IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE  *  170.0 F n  76.7 c              .SAMPLING DURATION B IBO.OO MIN
    STACK TEMPERATURE *  170.0 F B  76.7 c
     STACK PRESSURE  B 28.52 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER »   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                                                                  a  4.30




7
25
6 '.70

31
1
.20
.47
CO
r.l6B3E-(
32
2
7.19
14.28
a o'. 00
)2 GR/DNCF
S3
3
3.21
17.09


84
4
1.12
5.10
N2 B 76.08
2.0506E+01
35
5
0.70
1.27
02
MG/ACM
36
6
0.38
0.57
B 12.92

H20
2.67J5E*01
37
7
0.16
0.27
FILTER
8

0.21




 1.06E+01   5.94E+00   '
60.37     38.15     11.56
                              2.12E+00  5.29e°01  2.38E-01  1.12E.01  8.93E-02
                              3,62      1.64      0,75      0.33
          7.88E+00   2.37E+00  7.42E-01  3.37E°01  1.54E-01  6,BSE.02
1.61E + 01  1.02E + 01   3.0<»E + 00  9.68Eo01  4.39E»01  2,01E = 01  8.93E-02
9.U1E-03  3.a2Ei>03   1.04E»03  3.2iea04  l,47e°04  6,74E»05  2.99E = 09
7.05E°03  4.46Ea03   i.35E°03  4.23E°04  1.92E-04  8.78E=05  3.90EbOS
1.90E+01  7.19E*00   4.BOE+00  1.90E*00  8.86E-01  5.19Eo01  2.46Eo01  1.12E°01
1.26E»01  8.71E+OS   2.03E+01  4,64E«00  2.60E+00  9,09E«01  2.89E.01  2.97E°01
J.55E+06  1.97E+10   l,50E*Ofl  5,73E*OB  3.156*09  5,47E*09  1.63E»10  1.80E+11
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE  ACCORDING  TO  THE  TASK  GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  OSO (MICROMETERS)                         10.90      10.68       tt.89       1.73      1,10      0,63      0.28
  GEO, MEAN OlA.  (MICROMETERS)               2'.87E + 01   1.09E + 01   7.29E + 00   2,91E*00  1.38E*00  8,31E = 01   «.ZOE = 01  1.99E = 01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                         J.26E+01   8.76E+03   2.01E+01   0.72E+00  2.69E+00  9.67E-01   3.23Eo01  2.97E-01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLE8/DNCM)              1.02E+06   l.SOE+10   1.01E+08   3.65E+08  1.94Et09  J.22E+09   8.38E+09  7.16C*10
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21  DEC C   AND T60MM  HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE              0.1«0     0.330     0.371      0.27)      0.308     0,373     0.3«9
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      1.8237    0.5768     0.2501     O.OflOB    0.052U    0,0333    0.02«5

-------
  AVCO-2    12-01-77   1502  -  1800
  IMPACTOR  FLOWRATE  c 0.615  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  nRnp =  2.oiN.  of  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  DENSITY f 2'.27  GM/CU.CM'.
                         OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF W.  HARK  III  SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, - A
             TEMPERATURE s  170.0 F o  76.7 c              SAMPLING DURATION a iso.oo WIN
    STACK TEMPERATURE »  170.0 F •  76.7 c
     STACK PRESSURE E 28.52 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER B   50.0 MICROMETERS
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            C02 B  6.70
  CALC'.  MASS LOADING  a  8.96IOE-03 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  D50 (MICROMETERS)
         1
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DSCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ONCM)  SMALLER TH*N oso
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (GR/ONCF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
  ON/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)


SO
a
1.12
5.10
N2 E 76.08
2.0506E+01
S5
5
0.70
1.27
02
MG/ACM
36
6
0,38
0.57
« 12.'

ST
7
0.16
0.27
                CO =  0.00
          1.1683E-02 GR/ONCF
   SI        S2        S3
   1         2         3
 7.20      7.19      3.2)
25.a?     H.28     IT. 09      5.10      1.2T      0.57      0.27      0.21
 1.06E + OI   5'.9«E*00  7.11E+00  2.12E»00  5.29E-01  2.38E-01  l.t2Eo01  8.95E-02
60.37     38.15     11.56      3.62      1.64      0.75      0.33
 1.JUE + 01   7.82ftOO  2.37E4-00  T.02E-01  3.J7E-01  1.50E-01  6.85E-02
 1.61E»01   1.02E+01  3.09E»00  9.68E-01  «.39E-01  2.01E-01  8.93E.02
 5.U1E-03   3.02E-03  l.OUE-OS  3.2UE-04  l.dTE-Oa  6.TflE-05  2.99E.05
 T.05E-03   U.U6E-03  1.3SE-03  0.23E-04  1.92E-OU  8.78E-OS  3.90C.05
 1.90Ef01   7.19E+00  U.80E+OQ  1.90E+00  8.86E-01  5.19E-01  2.166-01  1.12E-01
 1.26E+01   8.71E+03  2.05E*01  «.6UE*00  2.60E+00  9,09E»01  2.89E-01  2.97E-01
 1.55E+06   1.97E+10  1.5«F+08  5.73E+08  3.15E+09  5,a7E*09  1.63E*10  1.80E*ll
        H20 B  «'.JO
 2.6735E+01 MG/DNCM
FILTER
   8
            DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                         10.90     10.88      U.89      1.73      1.10      0,63      0.28
  GEO.  MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)               2.87E*01   1.09E+01   7.29E+00  2.91E+00  1.38E+00  8.31E-01  0.206.01  1.99E«01
  DM/DLOGP (MG/DNCM)                         1.26E+01   8.76E»03   2.0«E+01  «.72E+00  a.69EtOO  9.67E-01  3.23E-01  2.97E-01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTTCLES/DNCM)              1.02E+06   1.30E+10   t.niE+08  3.65E+08  1.9aE+n9  3.22E+09  B.32E+09  7.16E*10
NORMAL (FWGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI  HY STAGE              0.1UU     0.3JO     0.371     0.271     0.308     0.373     0.309
  HOLE DIAMETERS RY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)     1.8237    0.576B    0.2501    0.0808    0.052«    O.OJ33    0.02«5

-------
  AVC0.4    ]2-0?»77   1111  -  1436
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE  B 0,810  ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE  PROP  =  3.SIN.  OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  DENSITY « 2'.27 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            C02 •
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING B 1.7076E-OS GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  D50 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DSCM/8TAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER  THAN oso
  CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER  THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER  THAN 050
  GEO, MEAN ou. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (MQ/DNCMJ
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PA»TICLE8/ONCM)
                         OUTLET  SAMPLE    U.  OF  W.  MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, o A
    IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  160.0 F «  71.1  c              SAMPLING DURATION a  iso.oo MI
    STACK TEMPERATURE »  160.8 F a  71.1 c
     STACK PRESSURE  s 28.91  IN.  OF HG     MAX.  PARTICLE DIAMETER B   SO'.O MICROMETERS
  7.68

   81
   1
 6'. 22
 9.67
 2.95E+00  T.eiEeOl   6.74E°01   2.59E°OI  9.S7E-02  5.80E=02  4.02E°02  T.KlEoOS
40.09     24.25     10,59      5,34      3.aa      2,26      1.45
 i'.S7E*00  9.48E°01   4.14E-01   2.09E=01  1.342-01   S.84E»02  5.66Eo02
 1.9BE+00  1.20E+00   5.22E°01   2.63E°01  1.70E°01   1,12E°01  7.14E=02
 6'.85E = 04  4.14E=04   1,81E»04   9,12E»03  5.87E=05  3.86E-05  2'.07E = 05
 8'.64go04  5.23E-04   2.28E-04   1.15E°04  7,«1E=05  4.8BE-05  3.12E = 03
 1.76E + 01  6.22EiOO   ".15E + 00   1.63E»00  7'.58E»01   4.33E-01  1,93E = 01  8.a3E=02
 3.26E + 00  1,1«E + OJ   1.92E + 00   5,63E°01  a.50Eo01   2.07E°01  9.55Eo02  2.37E<>01
 5.00E*05  U.OOE+09   2.26£*07   1.09E+08  8.79E+08  2,15Et09  I.IIC+IO  3,33E*11

2.


6
2
CO B
1551E-03
S2
2
.21
.55

0
'.00

GR/ONCF


2
2


•
0
83
3
77
20
34
li
0.96
0,85
N2 B 75.82
3.9076E*00
85
5 ,
0.60
0.31
02
MS/AC*
86
6
0.31
0,19
» 12,48

87
7
0.12
0.1J

4'.9S17
FILTER
e

0.23
H20 a fl'.OE
e+oo MG/DNCM




AEROOYNAMIC DIAMETERS A«E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK  GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                          9'.42      9.41      «.22      1.49      0.94      0,52      0.22
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)               2.66E+01  9.42EtOO   6.30E400  2.51E+00  1.19E400  7,01E>01  3.39E°01  1.96E°01
  DM/OLOGD (MG/DNCM)                         3.27E + 00  1.15E + 03   1.94E + 00  5.73E»01  O.T2E"01  8.24E-01  1.08E = ei  2'.S7E»Ol
  DN/DLOGD (NO.  PARTICLES/DNCM)              3.30E+05  2,6SE»09   1.48e+fl7  6.93E*07  5.39E»08  1.24E*09  5.3ie+09
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21  DEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI  B^ STAGE              0.144     0.330     0.371      0.271      0.308     0.373     0.349
  HOLE DIAMETERS 8" STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      1.8237    0.5768    0.2501     0.0806    0.0524    0,0333    0.0245

-------
AvCD-6   12.02-77  1550 - 1850
IMPACTOR FLOWPATE B O.PII ACFM
IMPACTOR PRESSURE. DROP =  3.6IN. OF HG
ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY s 2'.27 GM/CU.C^
GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02
CALC. MASS LOADING B 1.9a5SE-03 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
DSO (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/DSCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/ONCM) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN DSO
GEO. HFAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
DN/DLORD (NO. PiRTICLES/DNCM)
                                                                    OUTLET SAMPLE   U.  OF W.  MARK  III  SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, • 0
                                               IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =  iho.o F E  71.1  c              SAMPLING DURATION a IBO.OO MIN
                                               STACK  TEMPERATURE B  ito'.o F =  71.1 c
                                                STACK PRESSURE a 28.91  IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER "   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                                                                                                         H20 B  a'. 02
                                                                                                                  S.6180E+00 MG/DNCM
                                                                                                                 FILTER
                                                                                                                    8
7.68

SI
1
6.21
10.13
CO
2'.a551E-(
82
2
6.16
2.82
a 0'. 00
)3 GR/DNCF
S3
3
2.78
J.a2


sa
a
1.11
1.02
N2 B 75.82
a.asiaE+oo
85
5
0.57
O.as
02
MG/ACM
36
6
0.32
0,26
• 12. as

S7
7
0.10
0.15
                                            3.08E+00  8.57E-01   1.0«E+00  J.ilE
                                           a5'.l«     29.88     11.38      5.85
                              0.22
1.38E-01   7.99E-02  a.OaE.02  6.66E-02
S.ao      1.98      1.19
                                            J.01E+00  1.35fi + 00  S.07E.01   2.60E>01   1.S1E-01   8.80E-02  5.J8E.O?
                                            ?.5aE + no  l.h8E + 00  6.UOE.01   3.29E>01   1.91E-01   1.11E-01  6.66E.02
                                            B.76E-OU  5.81E>Oa  2.21E-OU   l.iaf-OU   fc.61E-05   3,8«E.OS  J.llE.05
                                            1.11E-03  7.3aE.Oa  2.79E.oa   l.a«E>Oa   8.3SE.03   a.BSE-OS  2.91E.OS
                                            1.76E+01  6.18E+00  a.iaE»00   1.76E+00   7.92E-01   «,28E»01  1.83E.01  7.28E»02
                                            j'.aOEtOO  2,U1E*02  J.01E + 00   7.79E>01   U.71C-01   3.30E-01  8.91EoOJ  2.21E«01
                                            S.23E+C5  8.58E*08  3.58E+07   1.21E+08   7.97E»08   S,S3E»09  1.25E+10  a.8JE»ll
            DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                          9.«0      9.32      U.2"      1.72      0.90      O.Sa      0.19
  GEO.  MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)               2.66E+01  9.36E+00  6.2'E+OO  2.70E*00  1.2«E*00  6.93E-01   3.22E-01  1.37E-01
  nH/DLOGO (MG/ONCM)                         J.IIE+OO  2.«2E+02  3.03£;oo  7.92E-01  a.89E-01  5.56E-01   1.016.01  2.J1E-01
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DNCMI              ?.U6E*05  5.6«E+08  2.33E+07  7.71E+07  U.68E+08  2,0«E»09   5.75E+09  1.6aC*ll
NORMAL  (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS »RF  21  DEO c   AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE  ROOTS OF PSI  B" STAGE              ft.fa     0.330     0.371      0.319     0.321      0.389     O.J5«
  HOLE  DIAMFTERS qv STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      1.B237    0.57UJ    0.2512    0.0793    0.0«95    0,0330    0.0229

-------
  AVC0.7    12-05-77   )256  >  15«B
  tMPACTOB FLOWRATF  a 0.707  ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE  DROP  s  2.6IN.  OF  HC
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY • 2'.2? GM/CU.CM.
                                                                  OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF W. MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, » A
                                             IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE  a  1*5.0 F a  73.9 c              SAMPLING DURATION a iso.ee MIN
                                             STACK TEMPEHATURE «  ifcS.o f o  73.9 c
                                              STACK PRESSURE  c 28.67 IN. OF HG     «AX. PARTICLE DIAMETER o   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                              SI
                                              1
                                            6.69

                                            7.65
CAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            C02 »  6.70
CALC. MASS LOADING n 1.7895E»03 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
M6/DSCM/STAGE
CUM, PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM, (MG/ONCM) SMALLER THAN OBO
CUM, (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN D50
CEO, MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DLOOD (MQ/DNCM)
DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCMJ
                                                                                N2  B  75.60          02 o 13.40
                                                                                    4.o95oE+oo MG/ACM
S4
4
1.04
0.82
SS
5
0.65
0.19
36
6
0.35
0.06
87
7
0.14
0.03
                CO a   0.00
          2.3025E=o3  GR/ONCF
             S2        S3
             2         3
           6.66      2.98
           2.70      3.10      0.82      0.19      0.06      0.09      0.18
 2.73E*00  9.65E=01   1.116+00  2.91E«01  6.86E=02  2.23E°02  1.94E=02  6.282-02
48.17     29.85      8.61      3.29      1.96      1.S6      1,19
           1.22E + 00   3.61E»Oi  l.JSEoOl  8.13E-02  6.39E»02  a.88e=02
           1.S7E + 00   a.6«E=01  1.73E<>01  l.OSEaOl  8.23E>02 . 6.28E-02
 8.62E°0  a.SO
 5.2689E+00 NO/DNCM
FILTER
   8
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO TME TASK  GROUP  ON  LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                         10.13     10,12      1.54       1.61      1.02      0,37      0,29
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)               2.76E + 01  1.01E*01   6.78E + 00   2.70E + 00  1,28E»00  7,eSE = 01  5.78E = 01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/ONCM)                         S.13EfOO  l.fl2E+03   3.18E+00   6.06E.01  S.47E-01  8,83E=02  3,fl3E=02  2.09E-01
  ON/DLOGD (NO. PARTIcLES/DNCMJ              2.84Et05  2.62E + 09   1.96E + 07   6.26E + 07  3.15E + 08  3.79E + 08  1.92E*09  7.17E + 10
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21  DEC C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE              o'.lUQ     0.330     0,371      0.271      0.308     0.373     0,509

  HOLE OIAMETERS 0Y STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      1.8237    0,9768     0.2501     0,0888    0.0524    0.0333    0.0245

-------
AVCO-7   12-05-77  1256 - 15U8
IMPACTOR FLOWRATF : 0,707 ACFM
IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP =  2.6IN. OF HG
ASSUMFH PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27 GM/CU.C"
CAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02
CALC. MASS LOADING e 1.7895E.03 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/D9CM/STAGE
CUM, PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (MO/ACM) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (MG/ONCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM, (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTlcLES/DNCM)
                                                                    OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF w. MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NQ. • A
                                               IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  i65.o F =  73.9 c              SAMPLING DURATION « iso.oo MIN
                                               STACK TEMPERATURE a  i^s.o F a  73.9 c
                                                STACK PRESSURE » 28.67 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER •>
                                          «  6.70
                                                                                N2 a 75.60          02
                                                                                    a.o950E*oo MG/ACM
                                              SI
                                              1
                                            6'.69
                                            7.65
34
4
1.04
0,82
85
5
0.65
0.19
36
6
0,33
0,06
37
T
0,14
0,03
  0.18
                CO o  0.00
          2'.3025E»03 GR/ONCF
             82        S3
             2         3
           6.68      2.98
           2.70      3.10
 2.73E+00  9.65E-01  l.m + 00  2.91E-01  6.86E-02  2.?3£-02  1.94E-02  6.28E-02
48.17     29.85      8.81      3.29      1.98      1,36      1,19
 1.97E+00  1.22E+00  3.61E-01  1.35E-01  8.13E-02  6.39E-02  4.88E-02
 2.54E+00  1.97E»Ofl  4.64E-01  1,73E=01  1.05E-01  8.23E-02  6.28E-02
 8.62E-04  5.34Eo04  1.38E.04  5.88E-05  3.55E-05  2.79E-05  2.13E-09
 f.lie-03  6.87E-04  2.03E.04  7.56E-OS  4.57E-05  3.39E-05  2.75E-05
 1.83E+01  6.69E+00  U.06E+00  1.76E+00  B.19E-01  4,74E»01  2.19E-01  9.75E«02
 3.13E + 00  1.41E + 03  J.16E + 00  6.3SE-01  3.39E-01  8.35E.02  4.84E-02  2.09E<>01
 (J.30E + 05  3.98E + 09  2.99E + Q7  9.84E + 07  5.13E + 08  6,91E*08  3.88E + 09  l,89Etll
so'.o MICROMETERS
         H20 a  4.30
  5.Z689E*00 MO/DNCM
 FILTER
    8
            DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                        10.13     10.12      1.51      1.61      1.02      O.S7      0.23
  GEO, MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)              2.76E+01  1.01E*01  6.78E+00  2.70E+00  1.28E+00  7.63E-01  J.78E.01   1.77E-01
  OM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                        3.13E*00  1,«2E+03  3.18E+00  6.46E-01  3,a7E-01  8.83E-02  3.43E«02   2.09E-01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)              ?.8«E+05  2.62F+09  1.96E+07  6.26E+07  3.15E*Ofl  3.79E+08  1,92E*09   7,17E»IO
NORMAL (fNGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS APE 21 DEG C  AND 760*H HG,
  80UARE ROOTS OF PSt BY STAGE              rt.lttU     0,330     0.371     0.271     0.308     0.373     0,349
  HOLE DTAMfTERs (jv STAGE (CENT 1METFRS)      1.8237    0.5768    0.2501    0.0808    0.0524    0,0333    0.02«5

-------
  AVCO-9    12=06-77   1122  •  1822
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE  a o,696  ACFM
  IMPACTOP PRESSURE  DROP B  2.5IN.  HF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  DENSITY = 2.27  GM/CU.CM.
                                                                  OUTLET  SAMPLE   U.  OF w.  MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, •> A
                                             IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  165.0 F B  73.9  C              SAMPLING DURATION a 420.00 MIN
                                             STACK TEMPERATURE »  I65.o F o  rs.9 c
                                              STACK PRESSURE  B 88.2B IN,  OF H6     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER «   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                              31
                                              1
                                            6.702  1.89E = 02  9,70E>03  7.10E°OS
 3,«7E°Ott  1,60E>00   3.alE°05   l.USE»05  6.3«e«06  J.25E=06  2.J8Eo06
 a.53E°0«  2.09Ed04   a.45E-05   1.86E-05  8.27E=06  a02«E=B6  3.10E=06
 1.8UE+01  6.74C«00   4.50E+00   1.771*00  6.296=01  4.78E-01  2.212=01  9,84E°6i
 1.82E+00  8.18Et02   1.07^*00   1,29E°01  1.166=01  3.42E°02  6.49E°03  2.362=02
 J.U8E+05  2.J5E»09   9,93E*06   l.V5E*OT  1.7Se*08  2,64E«08  5.086*08  2.091*10
        H20 0  4.40
 2.6218E+00
FILTER
   8
                                                                                              9,23E=03  2.60E=03  7.JOE"03
                                                                                              0,37       0,87
            DIAMETERS A*E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING  TO  THE  TASK  GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                         10.21      10.19       4.57       1.62      1.03      0,98      0.25
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)               2.77E*01   1.02E+01   6.8Je+00   2.72E+00   1,29E+00  7,69E>01  3.81E=01  1.79E=01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCH)                         1.83E + 00   8.23E + 02   1.08E»00   1.31F. = 01   1.20E°01  3,662 = 02  7.28E=03  2,36E°02
  DN/DLOGD (NO.  PARTICLE8/DNCM)              1.64E«05   1.U8E+09   6,49E»06   1.24E*07   1.07E*08  l,3a£»06  2.51E»08  ?,89E*09
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21  DEC C   AND  760MM  HO,
  SQUARE  ROOTS OF PSI BV STAGE              0.14U     0.330     0.371      0.271      0.308     0,373     0,349
  HOLE DIAMETERS BV STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      1.8237    0.5768     0,2501     0,0808    0.0524    0.0333    O.OZ45

-------
  AVCO-9   12.06-77  H22 - 1822
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE « 0.6"* ACFM
  IMPACT™ PRESSURE DROP =  2.SIN. OF HC
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.27 GM/CU.C*'.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02
  CALC.  MASS LOADING B 8.77U2E-OU GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  DSO (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/OSCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/nNCM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. CGR/ACM SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGn (MQ/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     OUTLET SAMPLE   u. OF w. MARK m SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, •  A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =  tts.o F s  TJ.<> c              SAMPLING DURATION • «2o.oo  MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE =  165.0 F o  71.0 C
 STACK PRESSURE s 28.2B IN. OF MG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER a   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                 N2 > 75.52          02 B 13,38
                                     2.00T6F+00 MG/ACM
8  6.69          CO B  0.00
           l'.l«57E-03 GR/ONCF
    SI        S2        S3        SO        35        36        87
    1         2         3         «         5         6         7
  6.7(1      6,73      3,00      1,01      0.65      0.35      O.ld
 10.05      3.50      2.38      0.38      0.13      0.06      0.03
  1.59E+00  5.58E.01  3.76E-01  S.92E°02  2.37E-02  9.23E-OS  2.60E.03  T.IOE'OS
 39.53     18.23      3.88      1.62      0.72      0.37      0.2T
  7.9UE-01  3.66E-01  T.79E-02  3.2fcE-02  1.U5E-02  7,a3E-03  5,a«E-03
  1.0«E+00  U.78E-01  1.02E-01  a.26E-02  1.89E.02  9.70E-03  T.lOEoOS
  3.U7E-Ott  1.60E-04  3.41E«05  1.«3E.05  6.3Ue=Ofc  3,25E»06  2.36E-06
  U.53E-OU  2.09E.Ofl  1.(l5C-05  1.86E = 05  8.27E«06  
-------
        l   12-07-77   105U  o  1756
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATE  B 1.020  ACF1
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE  DROP  =  5.5IN.  Of  HG
  ASSUMEH  PARTICLE  DENSITY « 2'.27  GM/CU.CM.
                     OUTLET SAMPLE   u.  QF w.  MARK in SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO. o A
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a  165.0 f »  73.9  C              SAMPLING DURATION * 422.00 WIN
STACK TEMPERATURE a  165.8 F a  73.9 c
 STACK PRESSURE B 28.88 IN. OF HC     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER o   30.0 MICROMETERS
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            CO? o  6.76
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING  a  6.2791E.OU  GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DSCM/ST»GE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS  SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN  050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM)  SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN  oso
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN D1A.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MQ/DNCM)
  ON/DLOGO  (NO. PARTlcLES/DNCM)
                                                           CO
                  o'. 00
N2 9 76.31          02 = 13.52
    1.4S69E«00 MS/ACM
       H20 P  J.40
1.81B3E*00 P.6/DNCM
81
1
5.57
11.46
1.19E*00
34.37
U.97E-01
6'.29E = 01
2.17E=04
2.75E-00
1.67E+01
i.23E*00
3.26E*05


5
3
4
12
1
2
7
9
5
5
2
82
2
.56
.88
.03Eo01
.02
.79E-01
.26E-01
,80E=05
.87E-05
.56E+00
.89E+02
.88E+09


2
1
1
2
3
4
1
1
3
5
8
33
3
.OT
.T«
,81E=01
.07
,50E=02
.46E=02
,55E=05
.96E-05
,ne»oo
.14E.01
.50E+06
84
4
0.85
0.28
2.88E°02
0.88
1.27Eo02
1.61Eo02
3.33Eo06
7.03E°06
1.05E*00
6.21E-02
1.71E»07
S5
3
0.32
0.06
6.26E°03
0.34
7'.76E°03
9.81E-05
3.39Eo06
4.29Eo06
6.67E°01
2.97E=02
8,02E*07


0.
0.
2.
0.
6.
1.
2.
3.
3,
6.
1.
36
6
26
02
03E°03
43
13E°03
78E°03
69E°06
40Eo06
68E«01
63E=03
12E+08


0.
0.
1.
o.
s.
4.
2.
2.
1.
2.
3.
87
7
09
01
OZEo03
37
J3E°03
7TEo03
S4E°06
96E=06
SOEaOl
13E=03
S3E+08
PILTER
a

0.07
6.7TE=OJ





6.13E«02
2.89E°oe
8,12e»10
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                          B.««      8.12      3.77      1.33      0.83      0.44      0.17
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)              2.32Et01  8.43E+00  3.6UE + 00  Z.?«E*00  1.05E»00  6.0SE<>01  2.788 = 01  1.19E=01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/ONC*)                         1.25E*00  5.92E«02  S.19E<>01  6,SOE = 02  1.10Eo02  7.38Eo03  2.05E=OS  2.2SE»02
  DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)              1.49E+05  1.89E+09  5.3«E*06  1,08E»07  5.10E+07  6.29E»07  2.S2E*08  !,33E«10
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of P3T BY STAGE              0.100     0.330     0.371     0,271     0.308     0,373     0.309
  HOLE DIAMETERS H* STAGE (CENTIMETERS)     t.8237    0.5768    0.2501    0.0808    0.032«    0,0333    0.02«5

-------
  AVCO-11   12-07.77  1051 - 1756
  IMPACTOR FLOWRATF. c J.820 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE PROP =  5.5IN. OF HC,
  ASSUMED  PARTICLE DENSITY s 2'.27 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           CO? :
  CALC.  MASS LOADING = 6.27'af-Od GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INOEK NIJMBER
  050 (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/OSCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/RNCF) SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/ONCMJ
                     OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF a.  MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO, - *
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE c  i65.o f a  73.9 c              SAMPLING DURATION • (122.00 MIN
STACK TEMPERATURF. «=  ibS.o F B  73.9 c
 STACK PRESSURE o 28,88 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER «   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                 N2 a 76.31          02 • IS.52
                                     l.«369E+00 M6/ACM
  6.76          CO »  0.00
          7.9H59E-0* GR/DMCP
   SI         32    .    S3        SU        85        36        37
   1231567
 5.57       5.56      2.07      0.85      0.52      0.26      0.09
11.at       3.88      1.7fl      0.28      0.06      0.02      0.01
 I.19E*00  «.03E-01  1.81E-01  2.88E-02  6.26E-03  2.03E«03  1.02E-OS  6.77E=OJ
3«.57      12.12      2.a7      0.88      0.5U      0.«3      0.37
 U.97E-01  1.79E.01  S.S1F..02  1.27E.02  7.76E-03  6.15E-03  5.35E-OJ
 6.29E-01  2.26E-01  a.«8E-02  1.61E-02  9.81E-03  7.78E-03  6.77E-OS
 2.17E-01  7.80E-05  1.55E-05  5.55E«06  3.39E-06  2.69E-06  2.3«eo06
 2.75E°OU  9.B7E = 05  1.96E.05  7.0SE»06  a.29E = 06  3.
-------
AVC0.13  12.08=77  1142 - 1808
IMPACTOP FLOWRATE B 0,515 ACFM
IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP a  0.6IN. OF HG
ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY a 2'.27 GM/CU.CM
GAS COMPOSITION {PERCENT)           C02 i
CALC. MASS LOADING a 9.04B4E-04 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
DSO (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/DSCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN oso
CUM. (GR/Acp) SMALLER THAN oso
CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN DJA. (MICROMETERS)
OM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)
DN/OLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                                                                    OUTLET  SAMPLE    u.  OF  w.  MARK  in  SOURCE  TEST IHPKTOR NO, = A
                                               IMPACTOR  TEMPERATURE  «   iso.o r  a   54.4  c               SAMPLING  DURATION n 375.00 HIM
                                               STACK  TEMPERATURE  =   130.0 F B   54.4  C
                                                8TACK  PRESSURE  »  29.30  IN.  OF HG     MAX.  PARTICLE  DIAMETER  B   so.O MICROMETERS
3.84          CO  B   o.OO
        l'.0722E=03  GR/DNCP
                                                                                N2  B  76.78           02  •  15.36
                                                                                   2.0706E*00  HG/ACM
       H20 a  4.02
2,a536E*00 H6/DNCM
SI
1
9.91
4.50
1.60E+00
34.71
7.19E«>01
8.52E-01
3.14E°04
3.72E=04
2.23E+01
2.28E*00
i.T4e»o3


9
1
3
19
4
4
1
2
9
5
4
S2
2
.89
,04
.70E.01
.62
.06E-01
,B1E=01
.77E.04
.10E-04
.90E+00
.46E+02
.73E+06


4
1
S
4
8
1
3
4
6
1
3
S3
3
.44
.06
.77E-01
.25
,80E=02
,04E»01
,85E=05
.56E-05
.63E+00
.08E+00
. 13E + 06
34
4
1.58
0.19
6.73E°02
1.51
3.12Eo02
5.70E«02
1.37E-05
1.62E=05
2.65E»00
1.90E»01
6.79E+06


1.
0.
1.
1.
2.
2.
9.
1.
1.
3.
2.
35
5
01
03
14E-02
04
16Eo02
SeEo02
4JE-06
m°05
26E+00
65E-02
47E+07
36
6
0.58
0.01
4,04Eo03
0.88
1.62E°02
2.15E-02
7,9UE=06
9.41E=06
7,64E»01
1.70E°02
3.20E+07


o'.
0.
1.
0.
»'.
2'.
7.
8.
I,
«.
5.
87
7
27
00
35E=03
82
70E-02
02E-02
ASEP06
S2E»06
96E«01
04E>03
49E+07
FILTER
a

0.06
2.02E=02





!',9iE»0!
6.71E«02
8.15E+09
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS A»E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING  TO THE  TASK  GROUP  ON  LUN6  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                         14.97     14.95       6.74       2.42      1.56       0,92      0.45
  GEO. MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)               3.36E*oi   I.SOE+OI   I.OOE+OI   a.o«E+oo   i.94E*oo   i.i9E*oo   *,«ieooi   i.iyeoei
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                         2.28E»00   5.47E+02   l.09E»00   l.SJFoOl   S.9BE-02   1.76Ee02   fl.SieoOJ   6.T18002
  DN/DLOGO (NO.  PARTICLES/DNCM)              1.15E+05   3.12E+08   2.06E+06   4.J9E+06   1.56E+07   1.97E*07   J,14E*07   «,05E»09
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE  21  DEC  C   AND  760MM  MS.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE              0.144      0,330    0,371      0.271      0.308      0.373     0.349
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)      l'.8237     0.5768    0.2501     0.0808     0.0524    0,0333    0.0245

-------
AVCO-13  12-08.77  1142 - IBflfl
IMPACTOR FLOWR4TE s 0.315 ACFM
IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP =  o.6iN. OF HG
ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY e 2'.27 GM/CU.CM.
GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 B
CALC. MASS LOADING e 9.04B4E.04 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMRF.R
D50 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/DSCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM, (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM, (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM, (6R/ONCF) SMALLER THAN 050
GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)
DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
                                                                    OUTLET SAMPLE   U. OF w. MARK III SOURCE TEST IMPACTOR NO.  .  A
                                               IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE •  i3o,o r u  54.4 c              SAMPLING DURATION B 373,00  MIN
                                               STACK TEMPERATURE =  130.0 F s  54.4 c
                                                STACK PRESSURE B 29.30 IN, OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER B   50.0 MICROMETERS
                                                                                                                         H20  a  fl',02
3.84

81
1
9.91
4.50
C.60E + 00
14.71
CO B
r.073Zr-03
S2
2
9.H9
1.04
3.70E-01
1<».62
o'.oo
SR/DNCF
S3
3
4.44
1.06
3.77E-01
1.25
N2

S4
4
1.58
0.19
6.73E-02
1.51
a 76,78
2.0706E+00
SS
5
1.01
0.03
l.iae-Oe
1.04
02
MG/ACM
36
6
0,58
0,01
4.04£o03
0,88
B 15,36 H
2,fl536Et
87 FILTER
7 8
0.27
0.00 0.06
l.J5E=03 2008E»02
0.62
                                            7'.19E = 01  U.06E-01  e.eOE«02  3,i2E°02  2.16E°02  1,82E»02  1.70E.02
                                            R.52E°01  4.81E.01  l.OUE-01  3.70E-02  2.56E-02  2.15E=02  2.02E-02
                                            J.14E»0«  1.77E-04  3.B5E-05  1.S7E-OS  9,«SE=06  7,9«E-06  7,«3Eo06
                                            3.72E-04  2.10EoOII  a.56E = 05  1,62E<>05  1,12E>05  01  5.B5E = 02  1.70E°02  O.oaEoO]
                                                              )4Ea03  6.71E«Oa
1.74E*05  4.73E+08  3.13E+06  6.79E*06  2.47E+07  3.20E+07  3.49E+07  8.1SE*09
            DIAMETERS A*E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                        la.'7     la.95      6.74      2,82      1,56      0,92      0.45
  6EO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)              3.36E*01  l.SOEtOl  1.90E+01  4.04E+00  1.94E+00  1,19E*00  6.41E.01   S.J7E«01
  CM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                        2.26E*00  5.47E+02  l.O'E+OO  1.51E-01  5.98E-02  1.76E-02  4.33E.03   6.71E-02
  5N/DLOSD (NO- PiRTTCLES/ONCM)             1.15E+05  3.12E+08  2.06E+06  4.59E+06  1.S6E+07  1.97E+07  S,iaE+07   fl,63E»09
MORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI  BY STAGE              0.144     0.330     0.371     0.271     0.306     0,373     0.349
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)     1.8237    0.5768    0.2501    0,0808    0,052a    0,0333    0.0245

-------
          PART 2






CASCADE IMPACTOR RUN DATA




     June, 1978 Test
             84

-------
 APIT-i  uRu'K (r,un  b/!3/7fi
T"PACTCJP FLPt"R»TF s 0.060 ACFM
         PRESSl'fF npnp =  I.?IM, nF HG
        PARTICLE PFMSITY = 2.6? G«/CU.tM'.
GAS CPMposITIOM  (PEPCENT1           C02  =   0.00
CALC. MASS LEAPING = u.63i iE+flfl GR/ACF
TMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX MUMPER
D50 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
                                                                                   MOPIFIFD RRINK CASCADE I«PACTOR  DUMBER  •  G
                                                                                                     SAMPLING RURATTON  »   50.00
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. CMG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/f)NCM) SMALLE" THAN 050
CLIM. (GR/ACF) SMALLE" THAN 050
CUM. (GR/nWcF) SMALLFR THAN D5P
GEP. MF.AN niA. (MICROMETERS)
          (NO.
                           SAMPLE
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =    us.o  r  -    7.2  c
STACK TF.MPFRATURF =   (15.0 f =    7.2  c
 STACK PRESSURE = 28.97  IN. OF HG     MAX.  PARTICLE
            CO =  O.dO            N2  o 79.20          02  =  19.80
      U.60U9E+00 GR/DNCF              1.0596E+OU  MG/ACM
       SO        SI        S2         S3        S«        35
       1         2         3          a         5        6
     3.96      2'.20       1.50      0.92       0.16       n.17
   «51.66     30.55      27.73      15.16      10.00       2,«T
     8.81E+03  5.96E+02   5,«1E+02  3.02Et02  1.9SE+02
   16.38     10.73       5.59       2.73       0.88
     1.7«Ef03  T.ldEtOJ   5.<'3E*02  2.90E + 02  9.3«E*01
     1.73E + 0!  l'.13E + 03   5.90E + 02  2.88E*02  9.29E + 01   (i.U7E»01
     7.59E-01  (l'.97E»01   2.59E = 01  1.27E-01  (I.08E-02  1.96F-02
     7.51E-01  1'.91E = 01   2,58E»01  1.26E-01  U.06E-02  1.95E-02
     1.26E + 01  2'.95EfOO   1.82E + 00  1.17E*00  6.50F-01  2.82t-01
     8.77E + 03  2'.31E*03   3.22E + 03  1.11E + 03  6.56E + 02  1.12E + 02
     3.21E + 09  6'.63E + 10   3,'lE + ll  6.aiE*ll  1.71E + 12  3.66E»12
                                                                                                               uo.o  MICROMETERS
                                                                                                                         H20  «   I'.OO
                                                                                                                  1.0537E*0«
                                                                                                                         FILTER
                                                                                                                           2.29
                                                                                                                           «'.«7E*01
                                                                                                                           1.22E-01
                                                                                                                           1.18E+02
                                                                                                                           5.99E*1J
          PTAHFTEWS  APE  CALCUl.ATEn  HF»E  ACCORDING TO THE TASK GRDUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
050  (MICROMETERS'                                  6.U5      3'.61      2.«7       1.53       0.79       0.52
GEO, MF»N DJA.  (MICROMETERS)                       2.0aE*01  fl'.BJE + OO  2.99E + 00   1.9«EtOO   1.10E + 00   5,0«E»01
DM./DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)                                 fi.«OE + 03  2.37E + 03  3.27E + 03   l.««E + 03   6.H«E»02   1.23E + 02
          ^0. PAHTTCLtS/nNCMl                      1.97E + 09  U'.OIE + IO  ?.3«F + 11   J.77E + 11   9.83Ftll   1,83E*12
                                                                                                                           2'.27E.OI
PKAL (E'«Gt"FF.«Ir.:p ST
SNUAPE POnTs pF PSI BY STAGE
HOLE OlAMF.TfWS PY STAGE  (CENTIMETFRS)
                                               OEG C   AND 760MM HG.
                                                   0.32?     0.32?     n.37n     0.3«0      0.3«5      0,31«      0 . 3 1 U
                                                   0.3616    0.2(17?    0.1759    0.1367     0.0898     0.0567     0.0567

-------
   AP1I.2   BRINK  10*10   6/13/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOWRATE  e  0,060  »CFM  ,
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  e   0.2IN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  DENSITY a 2'.62 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02  c   0.00
  CALC'.  MASS  LOADING a 6.3114EtOO OR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  030  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF  MASS SMALLER  THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (M5/DNCM)  8MALLE"  THAN DSO
  CUM. (GR/ACF)  SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLER  THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/OLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
  DN/OLOGD  (NO.  PARTlCLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  «•  G
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE o   so.o r «  10.0 c              SAMPLING DURATION  a   6.00  KIN
STACK TEMPERATURE B   50.0 F a  10.0 c
 STACK PRESSURE B 28.97 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER
            CO o  Q'.OO
      6'.3579E*00 GR/DNCP
       SO
       1
     3.97
   129, Sa
12.02
31
2
2'. 21
6'. 79
6'.69E*02
7'.40
32
3
1.30
5.33
5.251
3'. 78
N2 a 79.20
    83
    4
  fl'.9Z
  2.98
                                                  02 » 19.80
                                             MG/ACM
                                            34        8S
                                            56
                                          0.86      0.17
                                          1.T6      0.30
                                   2.86E*02  1.73E+02  U, 932*01
                                  i.eo      o'.to      o.26
     1.7«E*OJ  l'.07E*03  5,06E»02  2.60E*02  0.73E + 01  S,B3E*Ol
     1,7«E*03  l'.07E + 03  5.«9E»02  2.6tE«02  8.7?E«01  3,B4E«01
     7.9BE°01  4'.67E°01  2.39eo01  l.UEoOl  3.B2Eo02  1.6TE.OJ
     7.62E-01  4.69E-01  2.40E°01  l.UEoOl  3.B3e«02  1.68Eo08
     1,26E*01  2'.96EtOO  ).8ae*00  T.17E + 00  6.52E-01  2,82Eo01
     1.27E»0«  2.63E+OJ  3.12e*03  1.3SE+03  5.83E*02  l.lSe*02
     a.63E«09  7'.J7E»10  3.76E*H  6.06E + 11  l.S3E«12  3,716 + 13
ao.o MICROMETERS
         H20 n  1.00
  1.4503E+04 MG/DNCM
         P1LTER
            7

           0.39
           3.84E*01
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                                 6.48      3'.63      2.48      1.33      0.79      0,32
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                      2.05E»01   u'.85E + 00  l.OOE + 00  1.95E + 00  1.10E + 00  5.06E=01
  DM/DLOGO (MG/DNCM)                                1.28E + 00   2'.66E + 03  3.17C + 03  1.3BE*03  6.07E + 02  1.26E + 02
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLE8/DNCM)                     2.84E + 09   4'.46E*10  2.2SE*11  3.56E+11  8.65E»11  1.866*12
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 PEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of PS! BY STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0.370     0.340     0.345     0.314      0.314
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    0.2472    0,1759    0.1367    0,0898    0,0367     0.0367

-------
   APII-J   BRT'J*  1'1UO   6/11/78
  TMpACTOR  FLpwuATE  =  0.060 ACFM
           PPFSSURE  DROP =  0.2IN. nF HG
        O PARTICLE  DF.NSITY = 2'.62 GM/CU.C".
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           en? a  o.oo
  CAI.C.  MA3S  LOiOING = 8. HJfeE4.no GR/ACF
  IMPACTOP  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NIIMRER
  D50  (MICROMETERS>
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE                          ,
  CUM. PERCENT nr MASS SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSC
  CUM. (MG/DNCM)  SMALLER THAN D50
  C'JM. CGR/ACF) SMALLER THANI 050
  CUM. (GR/nNCF)  SM4LLEP THAN D50
  GED. MFAN niA.
  PM/OLOGP
  DN/OL060
                     IHLFT SAMPLE    MODIFIED RRINK CASCADE  IMP&CTOR  NUMBER - G
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   65.0 F =  IB.J c               SAMPLING  DURATION a   6.00
STACK  TFMPERATURF =   65.n F e  i«,3 c
 STACK PRESSURE = 2<». 1 7 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  o
            CO a  0.00
N2 a 70.60
                                                         B  19.90
8.2882F+00 GR/DNCF l.S567E+0« MG/ACM


u
167
1
11.
SO
1
.02
."3

27
SI
2
2'.2«
s'.au
)a B'.UbEtO
6.82
32
3
1.52
6,«1
2 6,«2E+(
3.«3
S3
U
0."3
3.33
12 3.3flE + (
1.67
$u
5
O.ttT
2.03
)2 2.03Ef02
0'.60
S5
6
0,17
0,61
6.11
0'.27
     2.09E+03  T.27E+03  6.37E+02  3.10E+02   1.11E+02   5,10E*Ol
     2.1UE+03  T.29E+03  6.50E*P2  3.17E+02   1.13E+02   5,21E*Ol
     9.I5E-01  5.S3E-01  2.78E-01  1.35E-01   a.8«E»02   2.23E.02
     9.31E-01  5'.6SE-01  2.8UE-01  1.38E-01   a.95E»02   2.28E-02
     1.27E+01  3.00E*00  1.8UE+00  1.19E+00   6.58E"Ol   2,8«E«01
     1.69E+0«  3.52E+03  3.82E+03  1.56E*03   6.82E+02   1.U2E+02
     6.03E+09  9.00E+10  a.«5E*ll  6.80E+11   1.75E+12   U.SOE+12
oo.o MICROMETERS
         M20 =  0.50
  1.8966E+OU MG/ONCM
         FILTER
            7

           0.52
           5.21E401
                                            1,22E=01
                                            1.73E+02
                                            6.88E+13
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS A"E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE  TASK GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                 6.55      3'.67      2.51       1.55       0.80       0,32
  GEO.  MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E + 01  0'.90E + flO  3.03E + 00   1.97E + 00   1.11E*00   5.10E-01
  DM/DLOr,n tMG/ONCKl                                1.69E + OU  3'.36E + 03  3.88E + 03   1.60Et03   7.12E + 02   1.56E*02
  BN/DLOS!) t^n'. PiOTTCLtS'"fJC.M1                     3.70Et09  5.«UE+in  ?.66E*)1   3.99E*11   9.83E+11
                                                                             2.29E»01
                                                                             1.73E+02
                                                                             2.70E*|3
       (ENGIMEFRI.'.'1; STANOABO) CONnlTIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AMD 760MM  HG,
  SOUARF  pnnTs rif PSt "V STAGE                      n.J?2      0.322      0.37o      0.3UO      0.3«5      0,3lfl   .  0.31fl
  HOLE DTAMFTfBS XY STitF (CENTIHETE»S)             0.3616     0.2U72     0.1759     0.1367     0.0898     0.0567    0.0567

-------
   APII = tl   RRINK  loan   6/11/78
  IMPACTPR  FLOWRATE  o  0.060  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DRIP  B   0.2IN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY o  2'.62 GM/CU.CM.
  GA8 COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02  B   o'.OO
  CALC. MASS  LOADING a 7.««1«E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  050  {MICROMETERS)
  MASS  (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/ONCM/STAGE
  CUM.  PERCENT OF  MASS SMALLER  THAN oso
  CUM.  (MG/ACM)  SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM.  (MG/DNCM)  SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM.  CQR/ACF)  SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM.  (GR/r>NcF)  SMALLER  THAN DSO
  GEO.  MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD  (NO.  PARTICLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER  = G
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE B   65.o r c  i8.j c              SAMPLING  DURATION  ,    6.00
STACK TEMPERATURE •>   6S.o F =  ie.3 c
 STACK PRESSURE a 29.IT IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER a
            CO B  O'.OO
      7'.6015E + 00 GR/DNCF
so
1
0.02
1S3.20
SI
2
2'.2«
8.56
•62
3
1.32
5.93
                            N2 « 79.60          02 o 19.90
                                1.7028E+04 MG/ACM
                                S3        SO        65
                                «         5         6
                              0.93      0.87      0.17
                              3.12      1.76      0,59
          8'.58E + 02  5.90E+02  3.1SE+02  l'.76E + 02  5.91E+01
         6.81      3'.UO      1.60      0.59       0.25
2.00E+03  l'.16E + 03  3.79E + 02  2.736 + 02  l.OOE+02  fl.22E + Ol
2.00E + 03  1.19E + 03  5.916 + 02  2.79E + 02  1.036 + 02  (I.31E + 01
8.7«E»01  5'.07E = 01  2.53E-01  1.19E»01  «.37E»02  1.80Eo02
8.93E°01  5.18E°Oi  2.58E«01  1.22E»01  a.47Ee02  1.88E«02
1.27E + 01  3'.OOE + 00  l.eOE + OO  1.19E + 00  6.38E=01  2,8«EoOJ
l,5«E + Oa  3'.37E + 03  S.5SE+03  1.86E + 03  5.92E + 02  1.37E+02
5.51E + 09  9.13E + 10  «.12E + 11  6'.38E+11  1.51E + 12  fl.35E+'12
   ll'.TS
ao.O MICROMETERS
         H20 a  O'.SO
  1.7395EiO
-------
   APII-5   RRI^K  loan
  TMPACTOR  FLnwRATF  =  0.060  ACF"
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  =   0.2IM.  OF  HG
  AssuMEn PARTICLE  DENSITY  = a'.h? GM/CU.CM
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            co?
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING s 7.««96E*00 GH/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  I^OE* NUMBER
  D5«  {MICROMETERS'
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/ACM)  SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/DNCM)  SMALLE"  THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF)  SMALLE" THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLE"  THAN DSO
  GEO. MEAN DIA.
  DM/OLOGO
  DN/DLOGO  (NO.  PARTICLES/ONCM5
                       INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER  •  G
  IMP4CTDR TEMptPATURf :   fcn.O F s  \5.b C              SAMPLING DURATION  =   6.00
  STACK TEMPERATURE =   (.n.n F s  15.6 c
   STACK PRESSURE s 29.17 IN, OF HG
0.00          CO s  0.00
        7.575aE+00 GR/DNCF
         SO        SI        32
         1          2         3
       1.00      2'.23      1.51
     152.37      8.8a      6.U8
     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETE" =
N2 a 79.20          02 o 19.80
    i,7o«7E+oa MG/ACM
    S3        Sa        S5
    a          5         6
  0.92      O.a7      0,17
  3.19      1.8U      0,62
       1.52E+OU  R.82E+02  6.06E+02  J.18E+02  1.8UE+02  6.18E+01
     12.32      7.25      3.50      1.67      0'.61      0'.25
       2.10E + OJ  t'.23E + 03  5.97EtO?  2.8«E*02  1.0aE*02  U,S2E*01
       2.1«E + 03  1.25E + 03  6.07E*02  2.89E + 02  1.06E + 02  ((.S^E + Ol
       9.1BE-01  5'.39E = 01  2.61E-01  l'.2aE»01  fl.5«E-02  1.89E-02
       9.33E-01  5>8E-ni  2.65E-01  1.26E-01  U.62E-02  1.92E-02
       1.26E+0)  2.9RE+00  1.83E+00  1.18E+00  6.56E-01  2.B«E-Ol
       1.52E+04  3.U7E+OJ  3.84E+03  1.U9E+01  6.16E+0?  l.UUE+02
       5.5      2.19      l.5u      0.80      0.32
  GEO.  MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)                       2.05E+01  a.88E+00  3.02E*00  1.96E+00  1.11E*00  5.08E-01
  DM/DLORD (MG/DNC^)                                1.52E+OU  3.50E+03  3.90E+OJ  1.52E+03  6,a2E+02  1,58E»02
  DN/OLOGH (NO. BAPTICLES/DNCH)                      3.36E+09  5.76E+10  2.71E+11  3.86E+11  B.98E+11  2.29E+I2
                                                                               J.29E.01
                                                                               l.«6E»02
NORMAL (ENGINFFIIKiG STANDARD)  CnNDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  .SUUARF ROOTS nF PST HY STAGE                      0.322     0'.322     0.370     n.3ufl     0.3«5     0,31"      0.3ia
  HOLE DlAMfTEPS RY RT4GE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    O'.2fl72    0.1759    0.1367    0.0898    0.0567     0.0567

-------
   APII.fc   BRINK  10(10   6/15/T8
  IMPACTOP  FLtlk-RATE  s  0.060  ACFM
  IMPACTOP  PRESSURE  DROP  =   0.2IN.  Of  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2.62  GM/CU.CM.
  6A8  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            C02  «   0.00
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING a a.BJZlE+00  GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  DSO  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS  (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM.  PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM.  (MG/ACM)  SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM.  (MG/DNcM)  SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM.  (GR/ACF)  SMALLER THAN DSO
  C"M.  (GR/DNCF)  SMALLE"  THAN 050
  GEO.  MgAN nu.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MQ/DNCM)
  ON/DLOGD  (NO.  PARTicLES/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  =  c
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE 3   70.0 r a  n,\ c              SAMPLING DURATION  *   4,00  MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE =   TO.O F o  21.1 c
 STACK PRESSURE f 29.17 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER
                                 N2 » 79.60          02 o 19.95
                                     1.1057E+04 MG/ACM
                                     S3        SO        S5
                                     4         S         6
                                   0.93      O'.OT      0,17
                                   1.83      1.-05      0.29
         CO B  0.00
   H.9706E+00 GR/DNCF
    SO         Si         32
    1          2         3
  «.03       2'.2U       1.52
101.76       4'.33       3.27
  1.03E+04   4.37E+02  3.30£«02  1.8SE+02  1.06E*02  2.9SE+01
 9'.7?       5.88      2'.98      l'.36      fl'.OS      O'.l7
  1.08E+03   6'.SOE*02  3.306*02  l.SOE+02  4.71E»01  1.66E + 01
  1.11E+03   6.69Ef02  3.39E«02  1.5aE+02  a.8«E+01  1.92E+01
  U.70E-01   ?'.8flE"01  l.ttUEoOl  6.56E»02  2.06E°02  8,14Eo03
  «.83E=01   2'.92E°01  1,«8E°01  6.75E°02  2.12E-02  8.36Eo03
  1.27E+01   3.01E«00  1.S5E+00  1.19E+00  6.60E=01  2.8SE«01
  1.03E+0«   T.72E+03  1.96E+03  8.63E+02  3.55E+02  6,78Et01
  3.67E+09   a>OE+10  2.26Efll  3.72E+11  9.00E*1I  2.10E+12
ttO.O MICROMETERS
         H20 o  0.25
  1.137«E*0« MG/DNCM
         FILTER
            7

           0.19
           l'.92E*01
                                                                             1.22E>01
                                                                             fc'.37E + 01
                                                                             2.33E»1S
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                                 6.58      3.68      2.51      1.95      0.80      0.33
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E*01   «.92E+00  3.0«E*00  1.98E+00  1.12E*00  5,11E>01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                l,03E + Oa   l'.73E*03  1.99E + 03  8.83E + 02  3.70E*02  7,aaE + Ol
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLE8/DNCM)                     ?.25Ef09   2'.78E*10  1.35E+M  2.1BE + 11  5.06E + 11  1.06B + 12
                                                                             2.50Eo01
                                                                             6'.37E«01
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0.370     0.3UO     0.345     O.Slfl      0,31«
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    0'.2«73    0.1759    0.1367    0.0898    0.0567     0.056T

-------
   APIT.7   BRINK  m«0   6/15/78
  iMpACTOR  FLOWRATE  s  o.o&o ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE .DROP a  fl.?IN. OF HP,
  ASSUMED "ARTICLE DFNSITY = 2'.62 GM/CU.Cw'.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)        .    C02 i  0.00
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING  - u.SSUTE+OO GR/ACF
  IMPACTOP  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX
  050
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF  MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (MG/nNCM)  SMALLE" THAN DSO
  CUM. (G&/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLE" THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS!
  DM/DLOGD  (MG/ONCM)
  ON/OLOGD  (NO. PARTICLES/ONCM)
                     INLF.T SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR NUMBER • G
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   70,0 F =  21.1 c               SAMPLING  DURATION o   t>,oo KIN
STACK TEMPERATURE =   70.0 f =  21.1 c
 STACK PRESSURE = 29.17 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  »
            CO =  0.00
      1.685JE+00 GR/ONCF
       SO        SI        32
       1         2         5
     4.03      2'.2tt      1.52
    95.67      S'.ei      3.55
N2 B 79.60
    i.o«23E+oa
    S3        Sit
    (15
  0.93      0.«7
  1.78      1.17
                                                 02
                                                       19. 95
                                                      S5
                                                      6
                                                    0.17
                                                    0.30
 9.65E+03  3.8UE+02  3.36E+02   1.8QE+02   1.18E+02   3.03E+01
9'.96      6.37      3.2«       1.56      O.U6       fl',18
 1.0flE + 03  6'.61E*02  3,S7E*02   1.63E + 02   U.81E + 01   1.86E + 01
 1.07E + 03  6'.83E + 02  3,«7E + 02   1.6PE + 02   a'.9«E*01   1.92E*01
 «.5«£-01  2'.90E-01  l.«7E-01   7.12E-02   2.10E»02   8,iae-03
 0.67E-01  2.<»9E»01  1.52E-01   7.32E-02   2.16E»02   8.38E-.03
 1.27E + 01  3'.01E + 00  1.85E*00   1.19E + 00   6.60E-01   2.85E-01
 9.69E+03  1.51E+03  2.00E+03   8.39E+02   3,96E*02   7.01E+01
 3.15E + 09  a'.05E + ln  2,30Etll   3.62E + 11   l.OOE + 12   2.21E + 12
uo.o MICROMETERS
         H20 o  0.25
  1.0722E»0<|
         FILTER
            7

           O'. 19
                                                                             1.22E-01
                                                                             6'.3rE»01
                                                                             2'.5SE+t3
AERODYNAMIC niAMFTERS ARE CALCULATEn HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                 6.58       3'.68      2,51       1.55       0.80       0,33
  GEO. MEAN OIA, (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E + 01   tt'.92E + 00 3,0«E*00   1.98E + 00   1.12E*00  5,11E»01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                9.72E + 03  -j'.SSE + OS 2,03E*03   8.59E + 02   a,13E*02  7.70E + 01
  DN/DLPGD (Nf). PARTtcLES/ONCM)                     2.11E + 09   2'.U5E + |n 1.38E*11   2.12E + 11   5.6«E + 11  1,10E*12
                                                                             2.30E>01
                                                                             6.37E+01
                                                                             l.OOE+13
NORMAL (ENGIMEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS APE 21 DEC C   AND 760MM  HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS pF PSI BY STAGE                      0.122      0.322      0.370     0.540     0,3«5     0.3I«     0.310
  HOLE niAMETE»S RY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616     0.2«72     0.1759    0.1367    0.0898    0,0567    0,0567

-------
   APII-B   BRINK  1040   6/15/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOWRATE  «  0.060  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  e   0.2IN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY c Z'.bZ  GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            CO? «
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING a U.1505E»00  SR/ACP
  IMPACTOR  ST»GE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/8TAGE
  CUM, PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER  THAN 050
  CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (MG/D^CM)  SMALLE"  THAN 050
  CUM, (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (OR/D^CF)  8MALLE"  THAN 050
  6£0. MgAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DH/DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
  DN/OLOGD  (NO. PARTICLE8/DNCM)
                       INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER « c
  IMPACTOR  TEMPERATURE  a   70,0 F =  21.1 c              SAMPLING DURATION >   6,00  MIN
  STACK TEMPERATURE  «   70.0 F >  21.1 c
   STACK PRESSURE  «  29.17 IN. OF HG     MAX'. PARTICLE DIAMETER n   40.0 MICROMETER8
0.00
CO a  0.00
     GR/DNCF
     31        82
     21
   8'.24      1.32
   3'.71      3,10
                                   N2 n 79.80          02 o 19.95
                                       9,a977E+o3 MG/ACM
                                       sj        sa        ss
                                       4         S         6
                                     0.9J      o.«T      0,17
                                     1.05      1.10      0,32
   SO
   1
 4.03
87,36
 8.82E + OS  J'.7UE*02  S.13E+02  1.0flE*02  1.11E*02  3,8SE*01
9'.77      5.94      2'.74      J.67      o'.3«      0.21
 9.28E + 02  5'.64E*02  2.60E*02  l.S9E»02  S. 106*01  l,9fce*0l
 9.55E + 02  3'.80E«02  2,67E«02  1.63E*02  S.25E*01  8,022*01
 4.06E-01  2'.46E»01  1.14E-01  6.94E-02  2.23E<>02  8,37E=03
 4.17E-01  2.5Ue=01  l,17E°Oi  7.14Ea02  2.29E=02  8,eSEo03
 1.27E+01  3.0JE+00  1.8SE+00  1.19E+00  6.60E-01  2.83E-01
 8.83E+03  1.4TE+03  l.B6E*03  U.86E*08  3.72E+02  7.48E+01
 3.15E+09  3.94EtlO  2.1«E+11  2.10E»11  9.43E+11  2.36E+12
       H20 •  0.25
9.7700E*03 M6/ONCM
       FILTER
          7

         o'.ze
         200?E*01
                                                                               1.22E°01
                                                                               6'.70E»01
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                 6.3S      3.68      2.51      l.SS      0.80      0,33
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E + 01   0°.92E + QO  3,04EfOO  1.96E + 00  1.12E + 00  S.llEoOl
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                 8.88E+03   l'.49Et03  1.89E + OJ  4.97E + 02  3.88E + 02  8.21E + 01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTicLES'ONCH)                     1.93E+09   2.38E+10  1.88E+11  1.23E+11  5.31E+11  1.17E+18
                                                                               2.30Eo01
                                                                               l'.05E*l3
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEC C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI R* STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0,370     0.3UO     0,343     0,314      B.314
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0,3616    0.2472    0,1759    0,1367    0.0898    0,0567     0,0567

-------
   APTI-9  BRINK  lOUfl  b/16/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOWRATE = 0.060 ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE r>ROP s  0,21*. (IF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  PFNSITY = 2.62 GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)           C02 »  0.00
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING = 3.8770E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX DUMBER
  D50  (MICROMETERS?
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF  M»SS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM, (MG/r>NcM)  SMALLER TH*N D50
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 090
  CUM. (GR/pNcF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  OM/OLOGD  (MG/ONCM)
           (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM5
                     INLET SAMPLE    nonmEn BRINK CASCADE  IHPACTOR  NUMBER  - c
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE s   ?o.o f s  21,1 c              SAMPLING  DURATION  =    6.00 MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE e   70.0 F a  21.1 C
 STACK PRESSURE = 29.17 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  a
                                uo.o MICROMETERS
N2 « 7<9.80          02
    8.8718E+03 MG/ACM
                                                           19.95
    S3
    a
  0.9J
  1.03
                                               34
                                               5
                                                          35
        CO s  0.00
  3.9881E+00 GR/DNCF
   SO        SI        S2
   1         2         3
 «.03      2.2U      1,52
81.75      3'.39      2,71
 8.25E + 03  3'.U2E + 02  2.73E + 02
9'.61      5.86      2.86      1.28
 B.52E*02  5'.20E + 02  2.54E + 02  l.HIE + OZ  3.2«F + 01   1.28E + 01
 8.77E*02  5'.35E+02  2.61E + 02  1.17E + 02  3.3SE+01   l,31E*Ol
 3.73E-01  2'.27E«01  1.11E"01  «.97E = 02  1.41E-02   5:.57E»03
 3.83E-01  2'.3«E = 01  t.l
-------
   APII-10  BRINK  10*10   6/16/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOWRATE  o  0,060  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  =   0.2IN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY »  2'.62 GM/CU.CM.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02  a   0.00
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING a J."»550E»00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  030  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM, PERCENT OF  MASS SMALLER  THAN DSO
  CUM, (MO/ACM)  SMALLER THAN  DSO
  CUM, (MG/DNCM)  8MALLE"  THAN DSO
  CUM, (GR/ACF)  SMALLER THAN  DSO
  CUM, (cR/oNcF)  SMALLE"  ™*N DSO
  GEOi MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD  fNO.  PARTICLE8/DNCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER = G
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE «   70,0 F o  21.1 c              SAMPLING DURATION •   6.00 MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE o   70.0 F a  21.1 C
 STACK PRESSURE s 29.17 IN, OF HG     MAX'. PARTICLE DIAMETER o   ao.O MICROMETERS
      CO B  0.00
U.068UE+00 GR/DNCF
                                 N2 s 79.80          02 o 19.95
                                     9.0503E*03 MO/ACM
   SO
   1
 «.03
83.82
  SI
  2
2.2fl
S'.JJ
  82
  J
1,52
2.54
                               S3
                               fl
                             0.93
                             1.57
                                               3D
                                               5
                                             0.«7
                                             0.85
                                      0'.38
   35
   6
 0.17
 0.22
 2.22e*01
O'.lfl
               3'.3bE»02  2.56E»02
    '.15      5.5«      2.79      1.30
     8.282*02  5.01C*02  2,32E»02  1.186*02  3.«3E*01  1,3BS»01
     8.52E*02  5.16E*02  Z,99E«02  1.ZJE*02  3.53E«01  1.3lE»Ol
     3.62E-01  2'.19E = 01  1.10E=01  5.1«£o02  1.30E-02  3, 572=03
     3.72E=01  2'.25E-01  1.13E-01  5.29Eo02  1.3«Eo02  9.73Eo03
     1.27E + 01  J'.OIE + OO  1.83E + 00  1.19E»00  fc.60e = 01  ?,83E-=01
     8.fl9E+03  1.32e*03  1.32E*03  6,«6E+02  2.8?E*02  3.18E+01
     3.02E+09  3.50E+10  1.76E*11  2.79E+11  7.29E+1J  1.62E«12
H20 n  0.88
    MG/ONCM
FILTER
   7

  0.11
                                                                       1.?SE»1S
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                  6.58      3.68      2.Si       1.35      0.80      0.13
  GEO.  MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS)                       2.06EtOi   a'.92E»oo  3,o«e+oo  i.98E+oo  I.IZE+OO  S.UE=OI
  DM/DLOGD (MG/ONCM)                                 8.52E+03   1.33E+03  1.55E*03  6.61E»02  3.00E+02  3.655*01
  DN/DLOGP fNO. PABTICLES/DNCM)                     1.85E*09   2'.1«E+10  1.05E*11  1.632 + 11  fl.lOE+11  8,868*11
                                                                             2,30Eo01
                                                                             a.36g*01
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD)  CONDITIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SOUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0'.322     0,370     0.3(10     0.3
-------
   APII-ll  BRI^K man  6/16/78
  IMPACTOH  FLPWRATE  s ft.060 ACFM
  IMPACTC1R  PRESSURE  PROP =  0.2IN. OF HG
  ASSUME" PARTICLE  DENSITY = j'.6? GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)           C02 =  ft.00
  CALC.  MASS LEADING s 3.«980E+00 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  D50  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAQE
  CUM. PERCENT OF  MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CEO. MEAN DIA. (MJCPOMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD  (NO. PARTTCLE3/ONCM)
                     INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED BRINK CASCADE  IMPACTOR  NUMBER  -  o
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   70.0 F c  21.1 c              SAMPLING  DURATION  «    6.no MIN
STACK TEMPERATURE =   TO.O F =  21.1 c
 STACK PRESSURE = 29.17 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER a
                                                     02 B J9.95
S3
It
0.93
1.37
Stt
5
0.«7
0.90
35
6
0.17
0.22
         CO  o   0.00           N2 B 79.80
   3.5983E+00  GR/DNCF
    SO        SI         82
    1          2         3
  4.03      2'.2U       1.52
 73.01      3'.28       2.67
  7.37E+03  3.31E+02  2.69E+02  1.38E*02  9.08E+01  8.22E+01
10.53       6'.51      3.21      1.56      fl'.«5      O'.IB
  B.U3E+02  5'.21E*02  2.59E+02  1.25E + 02  3.63E*01  1.U7E + 01
  8.67E + 02  5'.36E»02  2.66E + 02  1.28Et02  3.73E»01  1.51E + 01
  3.68E=01  2.2BE-01  1.13E=01  5,««E-02  1.59E-02  6,«3E«03
  3.79E-01  2'.S4E"01  1.166-01  5.60E-02  1.63E-02  6.61E-03
  1.27E + 01  3'.01E*00  I.eSEtOO  1.19E + 00  6.60E-01  2.85E-01
  7,39Et03  l'.30E + OI  1.60E + OJ  6,U6Et02  3.01E*02  5.1«E*01
  2.63E + 09  3>8E + 1«  1.8SE+11  2.79E+U  7.71E+11  1.62E+12
«o.o MICROMETERS
         H20 a  0.25
                                                                           FILTER
                                                                              7

                                                                             0.15
                                                                             1.22E°01
                                                                             5.03E»01
                                                                             1.99E+13
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERF. ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                 6.58      3'.68      2.51       1.55       0.80       0.33
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E*01  
-------
   APII-12  BRINK  jnuo   6/17/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOWR*TE  =  o.o<>o  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  (iROP  =   0.2IN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE OF.NSITY a  2'.6?  GM/CU.CH'.
  CAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)            C0?  f
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING a 0.601«E*00  6R/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDFX NUMBER
  oso  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER  THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM)  SMALLER  THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLER  THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  OM/DLOGD
  DN/OLOGD  (NO.
                       INLET SAMPLE    MODIFIED 9RINK CASCADE IMPACTOR NUMBER  »  C
  IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   7b.o F =  21.1 c '             SAMPLING DURATION  .   4.00  MIN
  STACK TEMPERATURf  s   76.0 F s  21.1 C
   STACK PRESSURE =  29.17 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER o   OO.O  MICROMETERS
0.00
CO =  o.OO
     GR/DNCF
     81        S2
     2         3
   2'.2fl      1.52
   03  l'.80E*03  2.02E + 03  7.26E + 02  2.91E»02  3,70E»Ol
 3.09E+09  0.81E+10  2.12E+11  3.13EM1  7,37E*11  1.18E»12
       N20 a  6'.J5
1.0832E*OU M6/DNCM
       FILTER
          7

         O'.IO
         i.
                                                                               1.22E°01
            DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNQ DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                 6.58      3'.68      2,51      1.55      0.80       0,33
  GEO. MFAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E + 01  0'.92E + 00  3.00E + 00  1.98E*00  1.12E + 00   S.llEoOl
  DM/OLOGD (MG/DNCH)                                9.83Ef03  l'.81E + 03  2,05E»03  7.03E + 02  S.OSE + 02   0,lie«01
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                     2.10E + 09  2'.91E*10  l.J'E + 11  l.BaE + 11  0.15C + 11   S.86E+11
                                                                               2.30E°01
                                                                               3'.]5E«01
                                                                               5.26E«1Z
NORMAL (EwGINEE"ING STANDARD) CONOITIC1NS ARE ?\ DEC C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0.370     0.300      0.305      0.310      0.310
  HOLE DIAMETERS RY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.3616    0.2072    0.1759    0.1367     0.0898     0.0567     O.OS6.T

-------
   APII-13  RPINK  inun   6/17/78
  IMPACTOR  FLCIWRATF  i  0.060  ACfM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  a   O.?IM.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY s  z'.tz  GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            COS  r
  CALC.  MASS  LOADING s «.902  2.72E+01  l,01E»Ol
 4.84E-02  1.16E-02  4,29E»03
 fl.98E»02  1.19E-02  tt.UlE.03
 1.19E+00  6.60E»01  2,85E=01
 7.02E+02  2.91E+02  3.97E+01
 J.03E+11  7.37E>11  1.25E+12
H20 n  fl',25
FILTER
   7

  O'.tO
                                           !'022E<>01
                                           3'.S5E«01
AEROOVNA"IC OIAyETFRS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                 6.58      3'.68      2.51       1.55       0.80       0,33
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                      2.06E+01  U.92E+00  3.0KE+00   1.98E+00   1.J2E+00   3,11E»01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                1.06E + Ofl  l'.83E + 03  1.99E + 05   7.19E + 02   3.03E + 02   U.36E*Ol
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/ONC^)                     2.ME + 09  P.9UE + 10  1.35E + 11   1.78E + 11   1.15E + 11   6.23E + 11
                                           2.JOE.01
                                           J.JSE»01
                                           5.26E+12
       (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS APE ?1 DEG C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE HOOTS OF PS! B¥ STAGE                      0.322     0.322     0.370      n.3afl      0.315      0.3ia      O.Jlfl
  HOLE DItMETERS B* STAGE (CENTIMETERS)             0.361ft    0.2«72    0.1759     0.1367     0.0898     0.0567    0,0567

-------
   APIOo|    U.  OF  W.  A     6/12«l«/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOWR4TE  s 1.630  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  s  «.9IN.  OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE OENSITY = 2'.62  GM/CU.CM'.
  CA8  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02  =   0.00
  CALC.  MASS LOADING  o  7'.«"20Eo05  GR/ACF
  IMPACTOP  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS {MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/ONCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT  OF  MASS  SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MS/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM)  SMALLE"  THAN 050
  CUM, (GR/ACF) SMALLE" THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLE"  THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/OLOGD
  DN/DLOGD  (NO.
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a   85.0 F a  29.fl C
STACK TEMPERATURE »   85.o f «  29.a c
 STACK PRESSURE u 28.72 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER
SAMPLING DURATION B  ,2880  MIN
          ?o.o MICROMETERS
            CO


S2
2
90
13
N2 B 79.20
J.7144E
83
3
l.Tfl
1.33
02
°oi MG/ACM
sa
a
0.59
0.86
» 19.80

35
5
0.30
0.39
H20 B
1.8559E-01 MG.
FILTER
6

1'.37
 B  0.00
05 GR/ONCF
   si
   i
 3'. 90
IS'.Sl
 f.2SE=01  2.53E»02   1.25E»02   7.00Eo03   fl,80E=OS
32'.82     19.09     12.37       8.60       6.01
 5.63E-02  3.27E-02   2.12E-02   1.47Ee02   1.03E°02
 6'.09E-02  3.54E=02   2'.30E = 02   1.60E"02   l,12Ei02
 2.05   9.27E°06   6.44E°06   4,30E<06
 2'.66E°05  1.55E°05   1.00E = 05   6'.98Eo06   4.88Ec.06
 B'.88E + 00  3.94E + 00   2.62E*00   I'.OIE + OO   «.20E«FOl
 T.77E-01  3.71E*01   3.52E-02   1.49E-02   1.68E-02
 1.84E+05  4.11E+08   1.43E»06   l.oaE*07   1,60E*06
                          f.OO
                                                                             1.18E-0?
                                                                             2.16Eo01
                                                                             3.71E»02
                                                                             2.70E+01*
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS A»E CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                           6.a«      6,fl3      2.87       1.00       0,55
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                                l.aaE + oi  6.aSE+oo  «'.3oE+oo   i'.70E*oo   7,««E»oi
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                          l'.78E»01  3.74E + 01  3.56E-02   1.53E«02   1,83E»02
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                               l'.13E*05  2.68E + 08  8.58E*05   5.99E»06   8,S8E»07
                                                                             1.90Ba01
                                                                             J.71Eo02
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARDl CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEG C  AND 760MH HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS Of PSI BY STAGE                                O'.IOU     0.330      0.371      0.271      0.308
  HOLE DIAMETERS P" STAGE (CENTIMETERS)                       1.8237    0.5768     0.2501     0.0808     0.0520

-------
   APlo-3   U.  Of w.  D    fe/l3-ia/7R
  IMPACTOR FLPWR4TF  B 1.510 ACFM
  IMPACTOP PRESSURE  PROP =  &.6IN. nf-' HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.fa2 GM/CU.CM'.
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 =
  CALC.  "ASS LOADING  = 1.1299E-Oil 6R/ACF
  IMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  DSO  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (HILLIG»AMS>
  MG/DNCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT  nr MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/pNCM)  SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SHALLE" THAN 050
  CUM. (Gf'nNcF)  SMALLE" THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS!
  OM/DLOGD (MG/ONCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTJCLES/DNCH}
  IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   50.0 F =  10.0 c
  STACK TEMPERATURE a   50.0 F =  10.0 C
   STACK PRESSURE c 28.72 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER =
SAMPLING DURATION s   1867
0.00          CO o  0.00
        1.1««5E-P« GR/DNCF
                   SI
                   1
                   W2 s 79.20          02 = 19.80
                       2.5855E»01 MG/ACM
             32        83        Sa        S5
             2         3         a         5
 a'.Ol      3.98      1.79      0.70      0,28
13.83      2.88      1.66      0.72      0,58
 .l'.75E = 01  3.65E-02  2.11E-02  9.1«E-03  7.36E-03
32'.99     19.Oa     11.00      7.51      U.70
 8.53E-02  «,92E-02  2.8ilE-02  1.9UE-02  1.22E.02
 8'.6a£ = 02  a.99E-02  2.8BE»02  1.97E-02  1.23E.02
 3'.73E-05  2.15E-05  1.2<1E-05  8.a8E-06  5.31E-06
 3'.78E = 05  2.18E-05  1.26E-OS  8.59E-06  5.38E-06
 8'.96E + 00  3.99E + 00  2.67E + 00  1.12E + 00  a.a«E«01
 2.51E-01  1002£+01  6.06E-02  2.26E-02  1.8UE-02
 2.55E+05  1.17E+08  2.S3E+06  1.17E+07  1.53E+08
          20.0 MICROMETERS
                   H2D B  I'.OO
            2.6189E-01 MG/ONCM
                   FILTER
                      6

                     0.97
                     l'.23E-02
                                                                               1.98E-01
                                                                               U.09E-02
          C DIA"FTF.RS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  DSO (MICROMETERS)                                           b'.SU      6.09       2.9«       1.18       0,51
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                                I'.aSE + Ol  6.51E*00   a.37E + 00   l.BTE + OO   7.77E-01
  OM/DLOGD (MG/ONCM)                                          2.53E-01  1.03E+01   6.13E-02   2.31E-02   2.01E-02
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PAPTICLES/ONCM)                               1.57F+05  7.13E+07   l.aiE*06   6.79E+06   8.18E+07
                                                                               3.61E«01
                                                                               U.09E°0?
NORMAL (ENGINEERIMR STANOARD) CHNDITlnNS ARE 21 DEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS flF PSI ^ STAGE                                O.t««      0.130      O.J71      0.319      0.321
  HOLE DTAMETEPS RY STAGE (CfMTI METfRS)               .        1.82J7     0.57U1     0.2512     0.0793     0.0«95

-------
   APIO-u   U. OF w. A    6/1U-15/78
  IMPACTOR FLOHRATE n i.63o ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP -  1.51*. OF HC
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY « z'.bZ GH/CU.CM.
  GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           COS *
  CALC. MASS LOADING a 2.«56flEoO
-------
   APIO-5    U.  Of  w.  n     6/11-15/7B
  TMPACTOR  FLdWRATE  z 0.760  ACFU
  IMPACTOP  PRESSURE  rROP s  6.2IN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  DENSITY = 2'.62  GK/CU.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02  =   0.00
  CALC.  MASS LOADING  s  6.62HE-OU  GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDE* NUMBER
  D50  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/ONCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT  OF  MASS  SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM, (ME/ACM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (MG/DNcx)  SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/DNCF)  SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  OM/DLOGD
  DN/DLOGD  (NO.
IMPACTOP TEMPERATURE s   60.0 F =  15.6 c
STACK TEMPERATURE =   1,0.0 F =  15.4 c
 STACK PRESSURE s 28.2<) IN, OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER
                      SAMPLING DURATION s
                                            1270
      CO =  0.00
6.9073E-0« GR/DNCF
           31
           1
         5.73
        32.76
         T.25E + 00
        20'.89
N2 o 79.60          02
    l.SISlEtOO MG/ACM
                                                          19.90
  S2
  2
5.68
J.71
  3U
  a
l.OS
1.09
                        35
                        5
                      0,«a
                      O,a3
11.93
2.13
                      1.09
                                     S3 .
                                     3
                                   2.57
                                   2.97
                                   1.15F-01
                                   fl.76
               3.16E-01   1.81E-01  7.21E-02   3.22E=02   1.65E=02
               3.30E-01   1.89E-01  7.52E-02   3.36E-02   1.72E.02
               1.386-0/1   7.90E-05  3.15E-05   1.«1E-05   7.19E»06
               l'.aaE»Ofl   8.20E-05  3.29E-05   1.17E-05   7.31E-06
               1.07E*01   5.71E+00  3.82F+00   1.63E+00   6,71E»01
               2'.30E + 00   5.99E*01  3.29E.01   1.05E-01   «.«3E=0?
               1.37E+06   1.56E+08  «.30E*06   1.7BE+07   1.07E+08
                                         20.0 MICROMETERS
                                                  H20 s  fl.50
                                           1.5806E+00 MS/ONCM
                                                  FILTER
                                                     6

                                                    o.as
                                                    1.72E-02
                                            J.10E-01
                                            S'.71EoOa
                                            l'.flOE*09
AERODYNAMIC OUMETfRS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                           9'.32      9.25      tt.2|       1.71      0.77
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                                l'.7flE + 01  9.29E + 00  6.2flE + 00   2.6BE + 00  1.15E + 00
  DM/OLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                          2'.11E + 00  «.01E + 01  3.32E-01   1.06E-01  U.72E.02
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTjcLES/PNCMl                               B.U2E+05  9.56E+07  2.61E+06   I.05E*07  5.98E+07
                                                                             s'.uae.oi
                                                                             5'.71E»oe
                                                                             6,78E»08
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 OEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE BOOTS OF PST P.Y STAGE                                O'.iua      0.130      0.371      0.319      0,321
  HOLt DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)                       1.8237     0.57(13     0.2512     0.0793     0.0(195

-------
   APIO-6   U. OF W. D    6/15-16/78
  IMPACTPR FLOWBiTF s 1.510 ACFM
  IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP s  6.UN. OF MG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY = 2'.62 GM/CU.CM'.
  CAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 «  0.00
  CALC. MASS LOADING = 3.U71E-04 OR/ACF
  JMPACTOR STAGE
  STAGE INDEX NUMBER
  050  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MS/ONCM/STAGE
  CUM, PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/oNcM) SMALLER THAN DSO
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (GR/DNCF) SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)
  OM/DLOGD (MG/ONCM)
  DN/DL06D (NO. PARTICLES/ONCM)
IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE s   65,o F e  ie.s c
STACK TEMPERATURE •   65.o F s  is.3 c
 STACK PRESSURE  = 28.Ill) IN, OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER «
                                         SAMPLING DURATION o   1343
            CO a  o.OO
      3'.3288E-04 GR/DNCF
                 SI         82
                 1         2
               02  l,35e«02  9,66Eo03
 6'.38E°05  3,47E°OS  1.35E-05  3.63E=06  2,36E°06
 6'.68E°05  3.6«E'05  l.«lEo05  5.906=06  ?,472=06
 9.00E+00  U.OUE+00  2.69EtOO  l.lSE+00  4.48Eo01
 8'.78E = 01  1,93E*01  l.flbE-Ol  4.63E-02  1.96E-OJ
 8.77E»05  2.16E*08  5.45E+06  2,33E*07  1,60E»08
2o'.o MICROMETERS
         H20 a  0,50
  7.6174E-OJ MO/ONCM
         FILTER
            6

           0,31
                                                                            a.OOEoOl
                                                                            1.8BEo02
                                                                            1.71E«09
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                           6'.61      6,56      2.97       1.20       0,52
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                                f.«6E+01  6,59E+00  4.42E+00   1.89E+00   7,86Ec01
  DM/DLOGn (MG/DNCM)                                          8'.83E«01  1.97E + 01  1.48E»01   4.75E-02   2,16E"02
  r»N/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DMCMI                               5'.38E + 05  1,31E + 08  3.29E*06   l.S5E*07   8,fl7E + 07
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEG C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                                O'.14<|     0.330     0.371     0.319      0,321
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)                       T.8237    0.5743    0.2512    0.0793     0,0495

-------
   APIO-7    U.  C1F  w.  A     6/15-16/7B
  IMPACTDR  FLOWRATE  = 1.630  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP  =  4.6IN. Of  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY c z'.bz GM/CU.CM'.
  CAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            CO? B  0.00
  CALC.  MASS LOADING  s  3.063RE-04 GH/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  DSD  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/ONCH/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT OP  MASS  SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM, (MG/DNCM)  SMALLER  THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (GR/pNcF)  SMALLER  THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN OIA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD  (MG/DNCM)
           (NO. PARTJCLES/DNCM)
IHPACTOR TEMPERATURE a   65.0 F B  m.j c
STACK TEMPERATURE o   65.o F a.  18.3 c
 STACK PRESSURE e 28,UU IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER  a
                                         SAMPLING  DURATION  a   1343   »IN
            CO a  O'.OO
      3'.2100E-0« GR/DNCF
                 SI        32
                 1         2
               5'.90      3.B9
              33'.26      a.99
                   N2 B 79.60          02 a  19.90
                       7.0UOE-01 MG/ACM
                       S3        3a        39
                       345
                     1.T2      0.58      0,31
                     3.02      1.3«      0.46
 5.62E-01  8.«3E«02  5.10E=02  2.26E-02  7,772-03
23.17     11.99      S.Oa      1.96      0,90
 l'.65E = 01  8.aOE = 02  3.53E«02  1.37E-02  6.295.03
 1.72E-01  8.B1E-02  3.70E-02  l.««Eo02  6,396-03
 7'.19E = 03  3.67E-05  1.S4E-05  5.99E-06  2.73E-06
 7'.53E-05  3.B5E-05  r.62E-03  6.28E-06  2.88E-06
 8.83E + 00  3.90E + 00  2'.39E + 00  l.OOE + 00  a,23E°01
 7'.92E«01  1.2SE + 02  l.««E»01  4.82E-02  2.77E-02
           1.51E + 09  6.03E + 06  J.a8£ + 07  2,67Ei08
20.0 MICROMETERS
         H20 a  0.30
  7.34576-01 H6/DNCH
         FILTER
            6

           0'.39
           6',39E-03
                                                                             2'.19So08
                                                                             t'.38E + 0«
AERODYNAMIC DIAMF.TERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                           6.S6      6.S5       2.84       0.99       0,53
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                                l'.4UE + 01  6.36EtOO   4.25E*00   1.68E + 00   7,406-01
  OM/OLOGD (MG/DNCM1                                          7'.96E-01  1.24E + 02   1.46E-01   4.966-02   3.046-02
  DN/DLOGD tun. PAPTTCLES/DNCM)                               5'.1
-------
 APIO-fl   U. OF w'. A    6/16-17/Tft
IMPACTOP FLOWRATE = i.6so ACFM
IMPACTOR PRESSURE DROP »  «.BIN. OF «G
ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY B 2'.62 GM/CU.CM'.
GAS COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           C02 «
CALC. MASS LOADING a 6.«760E.05 GR/ACF
IMPACTOR STAGE
STAGE INDEX NUMBER
050 (MICROMETERS)
MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
MG/DNCM/STAGE
CUM. PERCENT OF MASS SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN D50
CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN 050
CUM. (GR/PNCF) SMALLER THAN oso
GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)
DM/DLOGD  (MQ/ONCM)
DN/DLOGD  (NO. PAHTICLES/DNCM)
                                               IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE a   70.0 F B  21.1  c
                                               STACK  TEMPERATURE  B    70.0 F >  21.1  c
                                                         SAMPLING DURATION  t   1326  MIN
   STACK PRESSURE • 28.56 IN. OF HG
0.00          CO B  0.00           *
        6'.80flOE-05 GR/DNCF
  MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER »
« 79.80'          02 o 19.95
 i.uei9E°oi MG/ACM
                   SI        S2        S3        8«        S5
                   12345
                 3'.91      3.91      1.73      0.59      0.51
                 6.TO      0.87      0.56      0.27      0,17
                 l'.13E = 01  l.«9E=02  9.6lEo03  «.63E»OS  2.92E=OS
                26.13     16.S«     10.36      7.39      5.51
                 S'.87E-02  2.fl5E-02  1.5flE = 02  1.09E-02  8,17E = 03
                 «.07E=02  2.S7E-02  1.61E-02  1.15E-02  B.SBEoOS
                 1.64E-OS  1.07E-05  6.71E-06  fl.78E»06  3.37E-06
                 l'.78E = 05  1.13E = 05  7.0SE = 06  5.03E«06  3.75EQ06
                 8'.8SE + 00  3.91E + 00  2.60E + 00  1.01E + 00  fl.a5E«01
                 T.62E-01  2.17E+01  2.72E»02  9.B6E-03  1.03E-02
                 1.71E+05  2.65E+OB  1.1JE»06  7.0«E^06  9,91E«07
                                                                                                                20.0 MICROMETERS
                                                                                                                         M20 B
                                                                                                                  i.5S7pE«.oi
                                                                                                                         FILTER
                                                                                                                            0.50
                                                                                                                            8.98EQOJ
                                                                                                                            2',83E«02
                                                                                                                            2'.06E«0«
AERODVNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  D50 (MICROMETERS)                                           6'.39      6.38      2.85       1.00       0,55
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                                I'.auEtoi  6.3BE+oo  «.26E*oo   f.69e*oo   7,«iE=oi
  RM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                          l'.63E = 01  2,19E*01  2.75E-02   1.02E-02   1,13E»02
  DN/RLOGD C"fl. PARTjcLES/DNCM)                               1.05E + 05  1.61E + 08  6.77E*05   «.05E»06   5.32E + 07
                                                                                                                          3.90Ea01
                                                                                                                          9'.21E«OB
NORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) CONDITIONS ARE 21 DEG C  AND 760MM HG.
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                                fl'.iau     0.330     0.371      0.27J      0.309
  HOLE DIAMETERS RY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)                       l'.8237    0.5768    0.2501     0.0608     O.OS20

-------
   APln.Q   U.  HF W.  D    6/16-17/7B
  TMPACTOR  FLOWRATE  = 1.510 4CFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  DROP =  6.5IN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE  DENSITY a 2'.b2 CM/CU.Cn'.
  GAS  COMPOSITION (PERCENT)           CO? =  0.00
  CALC.  ''ASS LOADING  s 6.2«3lE-05 GR/ACF
  IMPACTOR  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  050  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/ONCM/STAGE
  CUM. PERCENT  OF MASS SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER THAN 050
  CUM. (MG/DNCM) SMALLER THAN oso
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLER THAN D50
  CUM. (GR/nNcF) SMALLER THAN 050
  GEO. MEAN DIA. [MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOGD (MQ/DNCM)
  DN/DLOGD (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
IWPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   70.0 F B  21.1 c
STACK TEMPERATURE «   70.0 F a  21.1 C
 STACK PRESSURE « 28.56 IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER
                                         SAMPLING DURATION *   1326
            CO *  O'.OO
      6.S592E-05 GR/ONCF
                 SI        S2
                 1          2
               a.07      a,on
               5.91      0.78
                   N2 = 79.RO          02 a 19.95
                       1.0266E-01 HG/ACM
                       S3        S«        35
                       3         a         S
                     1.81      0.71      0.28
                     o.ae      o.23      0.27
 1.10E»01  l.aSE-02  8.8QE=03  a.26E-03  5.00E-05
2?'.ou     i7.«i     11. IB      e.60      5.si
 3.8fcE»02  ?.«9E»02  1.6UE-02  1.23E»02  7,58E=03
 a'.06E"02  2,<>1E-02  1.72E-02  1.30E-02  7.97E-03
 r.fc9E-05  1.09E-05  7.17E-06  5.«OE=06  3.3ie-06
 1.77E-05  1.1«E"05  7.53E-06  5.&7E-06  S,«8E»06
 <»'.02E + ftn  «.05E + 00  2.7JE + 00  l.l«EtOO  U.«8F.-Ol
 l'.58E"01  O.OUE + 00  2.56E-02  1.05E-02  1.25E-02
 T.57E+05  a,fl5E+07  9.U8E+05  5.22E+Ob  1.01E*08
20.0 MICROMETERS
         H20 «  0.25
  1.5010E-01 MG/DNCM
         FILTER
            6

           O'.flJ
           7-.97E.OJ
                                                                             2'.OOEaOI
                                                                             2.«5E*09
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARF CALCULATED HERF ACCnHOING TO THE  TASK GROUP  ON  LUNG  DYNAMICS  DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                           6'.6«      6.59       2.98       1.20       0.52
  GEO. MEAN OIA. (MICROMETERS)                                r.«7E+oi  6.«>iE+oo   «.«SE+OO   I.BQE+OO   7.88E-oi
  DM/DLORD (MG/DNCM)                                          1.59E-01  «.08E*00   2.59E-02   1.08E-02   1.37E-02
  ON/PLOC-D CNn. PAHTTCLES/DNCM)                               9.65E»OU  2.69E + 07   5.67E + 05   3.0«E + 06   5.35E + 07
                                                                             1.66E.01
                                                                             2'.65E-02
                                                                             l'.OaEt09
NORMAL (ENGINEERl'Ifi STANDARD) CONDITIONS APE ?1 DEG C  AND 760MM HG,
  SQUARE ROOTS OF PSI BY STAGE                                0.10U      0.330      0.371      0.319      0.321
  HOLE DIAMETERS BY STAGE (CENTIMETERS)                       1.8237     0.57U3     0.2512     0.0793     0.0«95

-------
   APIO-10   U.  OF  W.  0    6/18-19/78
  IMPACTOR  FLOI*RATE s i.sio ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE DROP =  h.SIN. OF HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY a 2'.62 GM/CU.CM'.
  SAS' COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)           C02 e  o'.OO
  CALC.  MA8S LOADING  a 9.2oi MG/
84
4
0.71
0.32
02 B 1'
ACM
85
5
0,28
0.03
  DN/DLOGn (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)
               l'.65E»01  2.00E-02  l',09E=02  5.91E«>OS  7,95E = OJ
              25.69     16.68     11.76      9.09      5,59
               5'.<13E-02  3.53E=02  2.49E-02  1.92E-02  1.16E-02
               5.69E-02  3.70E-02  2.61E-02  2.0lE=02  1.22E=02
               2'.37E-05  1.50E-05  1.09E-05  8,aOE-06  5.0»E«06
               2'.
-------
   APIO-ll   U.  OF  w.  4    6/18-19/78
  IMPACTDP  PLowRATE  =  1.630  ACFM
  IMPACTOR  PRESSURE  PROP  s   «.HTN.  OF  HG
  ASSUMED PARTICLE DENSITY 3  Z.bZ GM/CU.CM.
  GAS  COMPOSITION  (PERCENT)            C02  =
  CALC.  MASS LOADING  a  9'.075oE.OS GR/ACF
  IMPACTOP  STAGE
  STAGE  INDEX NUMBER
  D50  (MICROMETERS)
  MASS (MILLIGRAMS)
  MG/DNCM/ST»GE
  CUM. PERCENT  OF  MASS  SMALLER THAN  050
  CUM. (MG/ACM) SMALLER T«AN  D50
  CUM. (MG/oNcM)  SMALLER  THAN oso
  CUM. (GR/ACF) SMALLE" THAN  DSO
  CUM. (GR/DNcF)  SMALLE"  THAN oso
  GEO. MEAN OlA.  (MICROMETERS)
  DM/DLOBD  (MG/ONCM)
  DN/DLOGD  (NO. PARTKLES/DNCM1
  IMPACTOR TEMPERATURE =   TO.O F =  z\.\ c
  STACK TEMPERATURE =   TO.O F c  21.1 c
   STACK PRESSURE = 28,feU IN. OF HG     MAX. PARTICLE DIAMETER o
SAMPLING DURATION o  1440  HIM
0.00          CO s  0.00
        <»'.5032E-05 GR/ONCF
                   SI
                   1
                 5.92
                lO'.Ol
                   N2 o 79.84          02 • 19.96
                       2.0767E-01 MG/ACM
             32        33        34        35
             2345
           3.91      1.73      0,59      0.31
           0.89      0.48      0.31      0,25
 l'.71E»01  1.52E-02  8.21E-03  5.30E*03  4,28E*03
21.24     14,24     10,46      8,03      6,06
 U.41E-02  2.96E-02  2.17E-02  1.67E-02  1.26E.02
 4.62E»02  3.10E-02  2.28E-02  1.T5E-02  1.32E-02
 l'.<»3E-05  1.29E.OS  9.50E-06  7.28E-06  5.50E«06
 2.02E-05  1.35E-05  9.9ttE>06  7.63E-06  3.76E-06
 8.85E+00  3.91E*00  2.60E+00  1.01E+00  4.24E-01
 2'.42E»01  2.22E + 01  2.3?E=02  1.13E-02  1.51E-02
 2.54E+05  2.70E+08  9.62E+05  8.05E»06  l,45e+08
          20.0 MICROMETERS
                   H20 B  0.20
            ?.!7U7E=01 MG/ONCM
                   FILTER
                      6

                     0.77
                     1.32E-02
                                                                               2.16E>01
                                                                               «',J8E»02
                                                                               1,15E*09
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS ARE CALCULATED HERE ACCORDING TO THE TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS DEFINITION
  050 (MICROMETERS)                                           6'.39      6.J8      2.85      1.00      0,55
  GEO. MEAN DIA. (MICROMETERS)                                T.44E+01  6.38E+00  4.26E+00  1.69E*00  T.41E.01
  DM/DLOGD (MG/DNCM)                                          2'.43E-Ol  2.24E + 01  2.35E-02  1.16E-02  1.66E-02
  DN/DLOGO (NO. PARTICLES/DNCM)                               l'.56F + 05  1.6UEt08  5.78E + 05  4.63E + 06  7.79E + 07
                                                                               3.90E«01
                                                                               4.38E-02
                                                                               1.41Et09
FORMAL (ENGINEERING STANDARD) cnNDITIONS ARE 21 DEG C  AMD 760MW HG.
  SQUARE ROnTS OF PSt BY STAGE                                O.iua     0.330      0.371      0.271      0,308
  HOLE DIAM£TERS RY STAGE (CENT I METFRS)                       1.8237    0.57fc8     0.2501     0.0808     0,0524

-------
                                TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read Inunctions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/7-79-070
                                                       3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 Apitron Electrostatically Augmented Fabric Filter
    Evaluation
                                 6. REPORT DATE
                                 February 1979
                                6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
 Larry G.  Felix and Joseph D.  McCain
                                8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.

                                  SORI-EAS-79-140F  (#20)
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southern Research Institute
2000 Ninth Avenue, South
Birmingham, Alabama 35205
                                                       10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                 EHE624A
                                 11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                 68-02-2181
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 EPA, Office of Research and Development
 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                 Final: 11/77 - 10/78	
                                 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                  EPA/600/13
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES  jERL-RTP project officer is Dale L.  Harmon, MD-61, 919/541-
 2925.
 16. ABSTRACT
          The report gives results of fractional and overall mass efficiency tests of
 two Apitron electrostatically augmented fabric filter dust collectors. The tests were
 performed on a mobile pilot-scale system collecting flyash produced by a
 pulverized-coal-fired industrial boiler and on a full-scale pilot plant collecting
 redispersed silica dust.  Total particulate concentrations were determined at the
 inlet and outlet of both devices. Inlet and outlet emission rates, as a function of
 particle size, were determined from about 0. 5 to 8 micrometers on a mass basis
 using cascade impactors , and from about 0. 01 to 1. 0 micrometers using electrical
 mobility and optical techniques. Total mass efficiency for the mobile system was
 99. 90-99. 94%; fractional efficiencies for the 0. 2-1 micrometer particle size range
 were 99. 85-99. 94%. Total mass efficiency for the full-scale pilot system was
 99.995-99.9994%; fractional efficiencies in the  0.2-1 micrometer size range were
 99.90-99.999%.
                             KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                DESCRIPTORS
                                          b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                             c. COS AT I Field/Group
 Pollution
 Dust
 Aerosols
 Filtration
 Fabrics
 Electrostatics
Fly Ash
Silicon  Dioxide
Pollution Control
Stationary  Sources
Apitron Filter
Particulate
Fabric Filters
Silica Dust
13B
11G
07D

11E
20C
2 IB
07B
 3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
 Unlimited
                                           19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report/
                                           Unclassified
                                             21. NO. OF PAGES

                                                 115
                    20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                     Unclassified
                                                                   22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                         108

-------