EPA-R 3-73-032
FEBRUARY 1973
Ecological Research Series
Fish and  Food Organisms
in Acid Mine
Waters  of  Pennsylvania
                                Office of Research and Monitoring

                                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into five series.  These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface  in  related
fields.  The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   4.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental studies

This report has been assigned  to  the  ECOLOGICAL
RESEARCH  series.   This series describes research
on the effects of pollution on humans,  plant  and
animal   species,  and  materials.   Problems  are
assessed   for   their   long-   and    short-term
influences.    Investigations  include  formation,
transport, and pathway studies  to  determine  the
fate  of  pollutants and their effects.  This work
provides the technical basis for setting standards
to  minimize   undesirable   changes   in   living
organisms   in   the   aquatic,   terrestrial  and
atmospheric environments.

-------
                                               EPA-R3-73-032
                                               February 19T3
       FISH AND FOOD ORGANISMS IN ACID MINE

              WATERS OF PENNSYLVANIA
                         By

                  Robert L. Butler
                   Edwin L. Cooper
                  J.  Kent Crawford
                   Donald C. Hales
                  William G. Kimmel
                  Charles C. Wagn«r

            Pennsylvania  State University
                 208  Life Sciences I
        University Park,  Pennsylvania  16802
               Grant # WP-01539-Ol(N)l
                  Project 18050 DOG
                   Project Officer

               Quentin H. Pickering
        Newtown  Fish. Toxicology Laboratory
         Environmental Protection Ageney
                 3^11 Church Street
              Cincinnati, Ohio
                    Prepared for

         OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND MONITORING
       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              WASHINGTON, D.C. 20^60
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 30403
              Price $2.10 domestic postpaid or $1.75 QPO Bookstore

-------
                       EPA Review Notice

This report has been reviewed by the EPA and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor fdoes
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
                               ii

-------
                            ABSTRACT

The three parts of this project relate respectively to the three
objectives:  1) develop a rapid and non-lethal bioassay for acid
water using changes in utilization of cover and activity of fish,
2) determine the effect of different levels of acid mine drainage
on the presence or absence of fish populations in the watersheds
of Pennsylvania, 3) determine the median tolerance limits to low
levels of pH of five aquatic insects chosen on the basis of their
wide occurrence and common association in soft-water streams.
Analysis of variance revealed there was no relationship between
cover utilization and pH levels or between activity and pH levels
for four species of fish (smallmouth bass, longnose dace, rock
bass and brook trout).  The failure of cover utilization and
activity to reflect changes in water quality conditions makes
this bioassay technique as tested unsuitable for the establishment
of water quality criteria.

In part II of the project it was found that common fish species
normally distributed over several watersheds were absent where
there was severe acid mine drainage.  Of the 116 species of fishes
found 10 species exhibited some tolerance to acid mine drainage
(values of pH 5.5 or less).  An additional 38 species were found
at pH values between 5.6 and 6.4 with the remaining 68 species at
pH levels above 6.4.  Severe degradation occurred at pH levels
between 4.5 and 5.6.

In part III all five aquatic species survived exposure for four
days to pH levels from 6.5 to 4.0.  The 96-hour TLm values ranged
from 3.31 for the most sensitive animal, Stenonema sp., to 1.72
for the most tolerant insect, Nigronia fasciata.
                                iii

-------
                           CONTENTS
Section

PART I:  COVER RESPONSE OF FISH IN BIOASSAY OF ACID
         WATER

         Abstract

         Contents

         Figures

         Tables

I        Conclusions

II       Recommendations

III      Introduction

IV       Materials and Methods
             Apparatus
             Bioassays

V        Results

VI       Discussion

VII      Acknowledgments

VIII     References

IX       Appendices

PART II:  THE EFFECTS OF ACID MINE DRAINAGE ON FISH
          POPULATIONS

         Abstract

         Contents

         Figures

         Tables

I        Conclusions
Page
  1

  3

  5

  6

  8

 11

 13

 15

 17



 29

 55

 59

 61

 65
 75

 77

 79

 81

 83

-------
                            CONTENTS

Section                                                    Page
II       Recommendations                                    85

III      Introduction                                       87

IV       Methods and Materials                              89
             Sources of Information
             Fish Collections
             Water Analyses
             Computer Analyses

V        Results and Discussion                             95
             Distribution of Fishes in Pennsylvania
             Distribution of Acid Mine Drainage
             Effect of pH and Acidity on Fish Populations
             Tolerance of Individual Fish Species to pH
               Levels
             General Discussion of Acid Tolerance by
               Fishes

VI       Acknowledgments                                   121

VII      References                                        123


PART III:  ACUTE TOXICITY OF LOW pH TO AQUATIC INSECTS

         Abstract                                          127

         Contents                                          129

         Figures                                           131

         Tables                                            133

I        Conclusions                                       135

II       Recommendations                                   137

III      Introduction                                      139

IV       Methods and Materials                             141
             Apparatus
             Bioassays
             Test Organisms
                               vi

-------
                             CONTENTS




Section                                                    Page




V        Results                                           147




VI       Acknowledgments                                   155




VII      References                                        157
                                vii

-------
PART I:  COVERT RESPONSE OF FISH IN
         BIOASSAY OF ACID WATER
                   by

 J. Kent Crawford and Robert L. Butler

-------
                            ABSTRACT

The objective of these studies was to develop a rapid bioassay for
acid water using changes in utilization of cover and activity of
fish.  Four species of fish (smallmouth bass, longnose dace, rock
bass and brook trout) were chosen for testing that were known to
be cover seekers and which included representatives of warm and cold
water streams of Pennsylvania.  Observations of behavior were made
in a stream aquarium after a 100-hour period of acclimation to the
test water (pH levels 7.0 through 4.0) and either 1/2 or 24-hour
adjustment to the test area of the stream aquarium.  Temperature,
velocity of water, and light period were controlled.

Analysis of variance revealed there was no relationship between
cover utilization and pH levels or between activity and pH levels
for any of the four species tested.  The failure of cover utilization
and activity to reflect changes in water quality conditions makes
this bioassay technique as tested unsuitable for the establishment
of water quality criteria.

-------
                            CONTENTS
Section

  I          Conclusions

  II         Recommendations

  III        Introduction

  IV         Materials and Methods
                 Apparatus
                 Bioassays

  V          Results

  VI         Discussion

  VII        Acknowledgments

  VIII       References

  IX         Appendices
Page

 11

 13

 15

 17



 29

 55

 59

 61

 65

-------
                             FIGURES

                                                            PAGE

 1       Diagram of the stream aquarium used for
         observing fish behavior                             18

 2       Test chamber of the stream aquarium                 19

 3       Artificial cover used in the behavioral
         study                                               20

 4       Cover utilization of age 0 smallmouth bass
         in water acidified in the laboratory                30

 5       Cover utilization of age I smallmouth bass in
         water acidified in the laboratory                   30

 6       Cover utilization of age I, II and III smallmouth
         bass in water acidified in the laboratory           31

 7       Cover utilization of longnose dace in water
         acidified in the laboratory                         31

 8       Cover utilization of brook trout in water
         acidified in the laboratory                         32

 9       Cover utilization of rock bass in water
         acidified in the laboratory                         32

10       Activity of age I, II and III smallmouth bass in
         water acidified in the laboratory                   33

11       Activity of longnose dace in water acidified in
         the laboratory                                      33

12       Activity of brook trout in water acidified in
         the laboratory                                      34

13       Activity of rock bass in water acidified in
         the laboratory                                      34

14       Cover utilization of age 0 and age I smallmouth
         bass in unpolluted water and in water polluted
         with acid mine drainage                             41

-------
                            FIGURES

                                                            PAGE

15       Cover utilization and activity of age I, II
         and III smallmouth bass in unpolluted water
         and in water polluted with acid mine drainage       42

16       Cover utilization and activity of longnose
         dace in unpolluted water and in water polluted
         with acid mine drainage                             43

17       Cover utilization and activity of brook trout
         in unpolluted water and in water polluted
         with acid mine drainage                             44

18       Cover utilization and activity of rock bass
         in unpolluted water and in water polluted
         with acid mine drainage                             45

19       Cover utilization for age 0 smallmouth bass in
         unpolluted water and in treated acid mine water     46

20       Cover utilization and activity for age I, II and
         III smallmouth bass in unpolluted water and in
         treated acid mine water                             47

21       Cover utilization and activity for brook trout
         in unpolluted water and in treated acid mine
         water                                               48

22       Cover utilization and activity for rock bass in
         unpolluted water and in treated acid mine water     49
                               !
23       Cover utilization for age 0 and age I smallmouth
         bass held for less than 15 days and for more than
         15 days                                             51

24       Cover utilization and activity for longnose dace
         with either a 1/2-hour or a 24-hour period of
         adjustment to the test chamber                      52

25       Cover utilization for smallmouth bass of ages I
         and older with either a 1/2-hour or a 24-hour
         period of adjustment to the test chamber            53

-------
                            TABLES

No.

 1      Representative water chemistry of source
        water used in behavioral tests                      22

 2      Fish ages and sizes and other specifics of
        test variations used in the behavioral studies      26

 3      Correlation coefficients and coefficients of
        determination between cover utilization and
        pH and between activity and pH for fish
        tested in water acidified in the laboratory         35

 4      Variables measured for tests of cover
        utilization and activity                            36

 5      Independent variables included in the regression
        analysis for each species                           38

 6      Results of multiple regression analysis using
        cover utilization as the dependent variable         39

 7      Results  of multiple regression analysis using
        activity as the dependent variable                  40

 8      Average velocities in the test chamber for each
        species tested                                      40

 9      Average cover utilization in seconds ± one
        standard error of the mean for fish tested at
        different pH levels in water acidified in the
        laboratory                                          66

10      Average activity in movements per hour ± one
        standard error of the mean for fish tested at
        different pH levels in water acidified in the
        laboratory                                          67

11      Average cover utilization and activity ± one
        standard error of the mean for fish tested in
        unpolluted water and in water polluted with acid
        mine drainage and diluted to the desired pH
        with unpolluted water                               68
                                 8

-------
                            TABLES

No.                                                         Page

12       Average cover utilization and activity ± one
         standard error of the mean for fish tested
         in unpolluted water and in treated acid mine
         water                                               69

13       Average cover utilization in seconds ± one
         standard error of the mean for smallmouth
         bass age 0 and age I held in captivity for
         less than 15 days and for greater than 15
         days                                                70

14       Average cover utilization and activity ± one
         standard error  of the mean for longnose dace
         and smallmouth bass with either a 1/2-hour
         or a 24-hour period of adjustment to the
         test chamber.  Longnose dace were tested in
         unpolluted water at pH 7 and smallmouth
         bass were tested in water acidified in the
         laboratory to pH 7 through 4                        71

-------
                           SECTION I

                          CONCLUSIONS

1.  Utilization of cover and activity of fish under successive
levels of pH (7 through 4) are not changed under the experimental
conditions and methods of this study.  In the tests conducted no more
than nine per cent of the variation in the above behavior could be
accounted for by changes in pH.  Utilization of cover and activity
of fish as tested are unsuitable as bioassays for establishment of
pH water quality criteria.

2.  Of the 16 variables measured for relationships with cover
utilization and activity none exerted a significant controlling
influence over utilization of cover and activity of all species.
The one variable having the greatest affect was the test chamber.
Differences as small as 15 to 17 per cent in velocity between the
two chambers were related to the difference in behavior.  In light
of published material, this is a very small change in velocity.

3.  There was no significant difference in the utilization of cover
and activity of fish in treated acid mine drainage water as compared
to that of fish tested in water from the home stream.  In view of the
first conclusion nothing can be said for or against treated water.

4.  Although there was no significant difference in utilization of
cover between smallmouth bass of age I held less than 15 days versus
those held greater than 15 days, those held longer than 15 days
had a lower mean time of cover utilization and a smaller variance.
Smallmouth bass of age 0 showed a significantly lower response in
utilization of cover when held longer than 15 days.  Holding wild
fish for extended periods modifies the behavioral parameters of
these studies and may likewise affect other types of behavior.

5.  Although there was no significant difference in cover utilization
and activity with two different periods of adjustment to the aquarium
(1/2 hour and 24 hour), there was an increase in the mean utilization
of cover and decrease in mean activity with smaller variance in
tests with the longnose dace.  There was a significant increase in
utilization of cover for smallmouth bass age I and older that were
allowed an adjustment period of 24hhours rather than 1/2 hour.
Therefore, acclimation to a test apparatus such as used in these
studies should be longer than is commonly used in studies of
behavior.
                               11

-------
                           SECTION II

                         RECOMMENDATIONS

1.  The techniques and methodology used in this study should not
be followed for establishment of water quality criteria on pH.

2.  If further work on utilization of cover and activity of fish
under successive levels of pH are to be made, the following results
of this study should be kept in mind.

     a.  Young-of-the-year and older fish if tested should be tested
         separately.  Response to cover is related to age.

     b.  The period of adjustment to the aquarium appears to be
         important.  The longer period of adjustment (24 hours)
         appears to have advantage over the 1/2-hour period of
         adjustment.

     c.  Attempts should be  made in studies using stream aquaria
         to obtain velocities of less difference than 15 to 17
         per cent for paired chambers.

3.  In these studies escape routes along gradients of pH were not
provided.  Furthermore, the area for movement of fish was restricted.
It is assumed that once fish learn of these restrictions and a lack
of pH gradient, there will be no change in behavior.  An experimental
stream of larger size may have taken care of this objection.  The
development of a stream with a built in system for gradients of
pH would be highly desirable.  Perhaps an open stream system could
be developed with acid introduction at one or more points and
gradient monitoring of acid conditions coupled with position and
activity of fish.
                             i
4.  The fact remains that response to cover is still highly
predictable in some fish, especially the rock bass.  If this behavior
is truly responsive under exposure to higher acidities, this species
should be considered in future testing.
                               13

-------
                          SECTION III

                         INTRODUCTION

When natural water comes in contact with tailings from abandoned
or operative coal mines, chemical reactions occur that can render
the water unsuitable for aquatic life.  This drainage water is
characterized by a low pH, high concentrations of certain heavy
metals, and often, a heavy silt load.  These water conditions are
common where coal is mined, whether by underground or surface
methods, and therefore constitute a massive pollution problem in
coal mining areas.

An inventory assessing the extent of the effects of mining showed
that 10,500 miles of streams "are significantly affected by coal
mine drainage pollution, 6,700 of these on a continuous basis"
(U. S. Department of the Interior, 1969).  In Pennsylvania alone,
2,300 miles of streams are polluted by coal mine drainage (Pennsylvania
State Planning Board, 1968).  Included in this mileage are parts
of all the major river systems in the state.  The recreation
potential that is lost to pollution from coal mine drainage on
streams such as the Susquehanna, the Monongahela, the Kiskiminetas,
the Clarion and the Casselman makes acid mine drainage one of the
most extensive water problems in Pennsylvania.  Knowledge of the
toxicity of mine drainage water to aquatic organisms is necessary
to direct programs of abatement and treatment.

There is reason to believe that behavioral bioassays can provide
a method for measuring non-lethal toxicity of pollutants such as
acid mine drainage.  Jones (1962) has shown that fish avoid a
toxic pollutant when given a choice between toxic and non-toxic
concentrations. In fact, he could detect an avoidance reaction by
the fish being tested at sublethal concentrations of the toxicant.
He has thus shown behavioral'tests to be more sensitive than the
traditional time-to-death tests used in lethal toxicity studies.
Sprague (1964, 1968) and Ishio (1965) have operationalized the
avoidance reaction in successful sublethal toxicity tests.  Waller
and Cairns (1972) have used fish movement as an indicator of zinc
toxicity.  Warner et al. (1966) have quantified behavioral responses
of fish at sublethal toxicant concentrations and have shown fish
to be sensitive to varying concentrations of pesticides.  Fish in
their experiments were trained to respond to a conditioned stimulus
in order to avoid an electrical shock.  After exposure to sublethal
doses of toxaphene, the fish become hypersensitive to external
stimuli.  Warner (1967) concluded in a review of literature on
bioassays that "quantitative behavioral change is the most sensitive
indicator yet developed of toxicant induced change in living systems."
Warner et^ al. (1966) and Warren (1971) also contended that the
behavior of an organism is an integrated reflection of the several

                                15

-------
bodily systems and therefore is a comprehensive parameter.
This is not true of other sublethal responses such as histochemical,
biochemical, or physiological change.

There is an apparent need for the establishment of reliable water
quality criteria for waters receiving acid mine drainage.  Further,
it seems that a behavioral bioassay may be a quick and sensitive
way of establishing some of these criteria.  This study evaluates
the use of change in cover utilization and change in activity of
fish as a behavioral bioassay.
                                16

-------
                           SECTION IV

                       MATERIALS AND METHODS

Apparatus

Observations of fish behavior were made in a stream aquarium with
water quality, temperature, depth and velocity controlled.  The
stream aquarium (Figure 1) was constructed of plywood coated with
epoxy.  Outer dimensions were 420 cm by 240 cm.  The aquarium was
60 cm wide.  Water temperature was controlled at a level known to
be near the preferred temperature of the species being tested by
two 1/2 horsepower Min-0-Cool coolers (Frigid Units Incorporated,
Toledo, Ohio) and by a 120 volt Indeecc (Industrial Engineering
and Equipment Company, St. Louis, Missouri) coil heater with an
accompanying thermostat.  The copper coil of the heater was coated
with epoxy.  Tests were conducted within 3 C for all but 4.4 per
cent of the fish used in the study.  Maximum variation of water
temperature for testing was ± 6 C of the desired temperature.
Water depth was maintained at 12 cm with some variation due to
evaporation.  At a depth of 12 cm the stream aquarium was
calculated to contain approximately 777 liters (206 gallons) of
water.

Water was forced in a counter-clockwise direction around the stream
aquarium by the force of recirculating water coming through the
nozzles from the pump.  Water velocity was controlled by adjusting
the valves of the nozzles.  The pump was a Vanton Chem Guard
centrifugal model (Vanton Pump and Equipment Corporation, Hillside,
New Jersey) with those parts of the pump in contact with the water
made of  plastic.  Deterioration of an 0 ring during the study
caused some metal-water contact.  This was not noted until the end
of the experiment.  This part, a mechanical seal assembly, was
heavily corroded, but it'is not known to what extent that corrosion
may have contributed toxic ions to the test water.  All pipes
leading to and from the stream aquarium were made of polyvinyl-
chloride.  Coils of the heating and cooling units and screens
dividing sections of the stream aquarium were coated with epoxy
to prevent contamination of the water.  The stream aquarium was
lighted by twelve 40-watt fluorescent lights automatically controlled
by a Tork time switch (Time Controls Incorporated, Mt. Vernon,
New York) preset to turn on at daylight and off at darkness.

Two identical test chambers were set up by placing divider screens
in the stream aquarium (Figure 1).  Each chamber was divided into
eighteen 20 cm x 20 cm quadrats (Figure 2).  An artificial
cover 20 cm x 20 cm x 12 cm (Figure 3) was placed in one of the
center sections of the test chamber.  The cover offered darkness,
                              17

-------
      to nozzles
             f



PUMP
              z=n— from drain
                                                           HEATER
o

O
COOLERS
O






TEST CHAMBER
#2
._ .. „ 1 7O .. n i
OBSERVE

6

0

VTION


—
— * — from pump ,_
NOZZLES

AREA


TEST CHAMBER


—
—



v^y


DRAIN
c


                                                                   240
                                420
Figure 1.  Diagram of stream aquarium used for observing fish behavior.
           Distances in cm.
                                  18

-------
                                                   120
VO
                                           Observation Window
     Figure 2.  Test chamber of the stream aquarium.  Distances in cm.  Quadrat where artificial
                cover was placed is marked X.

-------
                           20 cm
                                                   12 cm
                        ARTIFICIAL COVER

Figure 3.  Artificial cover used in behavioral study.  Cover was  made
           of plexiglass painted flat black.
                                  20

-------
quiet water, visual reference and tactual reference, four factors
identified by Raines and Butler (1969) as being important in
eliciting cover usage by fish.  From the dark observation area of
the stream aquarium (Figure 1), an observer noted the position of
the fish being tested.  Movements made by the observer could not be
detected by the fish.

Recordings of fish behavior were made during observation periods
using an Esterline Angus 20 pen event recorder (Esterline Angus,
Glenside, Pennsylvania).  One pen was used for each of the 18
quadrats.  When the test fish was present in a quadrat, the pen
corresponding to that quadrat was activated by depressing a switch.
The switch was held depressed, and thus the pen activated, until
the fish moved to a different quadrat.  Then, the switch was
released and the pen deactivated and another pen corresponding to
the new quadrat position of. the fish was activated.  This procedure
gave a continuous recording of the position of the fish and a
count of the number of times a fish moved from one quadrat to
another.

Water sources for the bioassays ranged from a soft water stream to
a stream polluted with mine acid drainage.  Galbraith Run, a small
stream draining sparsely populated forest lands, was used as the
standard water (Table 1) for the first series of smallmouth bass
tests and all the tests with longnose dace.  Galbraith Run water
was chosen because it is low in total acidity, iron, sulfates
and aluminum.  For the second series of smallmouth bass tests
and for the brook trout and rock bass tests water was taken from
the home stream of the fish being tested.  This means that water
from Standing Stone Creek was used for the smallmouth bass, water
from Big Fishing Creek was used for brook trout, and water
from the Juniata River was used for rock bass (Table 1).  Water
from the home stream of the test fish was used to avoid any shock
or physiological imbalance in the fish that could result from
being placed in water to which the fish was not accustomed.

Acid mine drainage water for the bioassays was taken from Beech
Creek, a stream with heavy mining activity in its upper reaches.
Acid mine water that had been treated to remove toxic quantities
of acid, iron and sulfate was taken from the mine drainage treatment
plant at Hollywood, Pennsylvania (Lovell, MS).    The data of
table 1 are not averages, but are considered to be representative
of normal to low water flow conditions.

Water for the bioassays was transported from the source to the
laboratory in a tank painted with epoxy resin to insure that no
foreign toxicants were introduced.  A gasoline operated portable
water pump was used to transfer the water from the stream to the
tank and then from the tank to the stream aquarium.

                                21

-------
     Table 1.  Representative water chemistry of source water used in behavioral tests.
Nb

Galbraith Run
Standing Stone Creek
Big Fishing Creek
Juniata River
Spruce Creek
Beech Creek
Treated acid mine
Acidity
(mg/1
CaO>3)
3
7
0
19
5
10
10
Alkalinity
(mg/1
CaC03)
28
70
93
65
93
10
10
Specific
Conductance
vinoho/ .
cm)
30
390
455
470
221
XL500
>1500
Total Sulfate
Iron (mg/1
(mg/1 SOrS)
-Fe) 4
<1.0 9.2
<1.0 22.2
<1.0 18.9
<1.0 21.4
<1.0 31.3
1.0 ^150.0
<1.0 >150.0
Aluminum
(mg/1 Al)
0.0
12.2
4.1
6.0
3.6
XLO.O
10.0
      water from Hollywood,
      Pennsylvania

-------
Four species of fish were chosen for testing which were known to
be cover-seekers and which included representatives of warm and
cold water streams of Pennsylvania.  These species were:  smallmouth
bass (Micropterus dolomieui), rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris),
brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), and longnose dace (Rhinichthys
cataractae).  Each of these species is important in the overall
balance of Pennsylvania stream environments.  Brook trout, smallmouth
bass, and rock  bass are also important as sport fish.

Experimental fish for the study were taken from streams that were
known to have good populations of the species desired and that
were close to The Pennsylvania State University.  Wild fish were
chosen over hatchery reared fish to avoid any existing behavioral
differences between wild and hatchery fish.  Electrofishing was
used to catch fish for the study since this technique minimizes
injury and provides an easy method of capture.  Nobrush Georator
generators (Georator Corporation, Manassas, Virginia) used to
capture the fish were either AC or DC, 115 or 230 volts depending
on the conductivity of the water.  Generally, less conductive water
requires AC and high voltage to be effective in capture of fish.
Fish with any injuries or abnormalities were discarded.

Bioassays

Methods were chosen that measured fish activity and response to
cover with changes in water quality.  Changes in fish behavior could
then be associated with changes in water quality, quantitative values
required of a useful bioassay.

Water quality levels used for the test were natural unpolluted
water, natural water acidified in the laboratory, diluted acid mine
water, and treated acid mine water.  Tests conducted in natural
unpolluted water were considered controls.  Water for these controls
was taken from Galbraith Run for the first series of smallmouth
bass tests and for the longnose dace tests.  For the second series
on smallmouth bass and for brook trout and rock bass, control tests
were conducted in water from the home stream of the fish being
tested.  Water from the same source as the control tests was also
used in tests of stress from low pH.  Reagent grade sulfuric acid
was metered into the water to establish the pH levels of 6, 5, 4
and 3.  These pH levels were maintained throughout the test by
adding sulfuric acid to decrease the pH to the level desired or by
adding calcium hydroxide to increase the pH to the desired level.
Acid mine drainage water from Beech Creek was too toxic to be
used directly without dilution as water for testing.  The pH of
Beech Creek water ranges from 3.5 to 4.5 with total iron concentration
around 1 mg/liter.  The acid mine drainage water was therefore
diluted with water from the same stream as the control water to pH
                               23

-------
levels of 5 and 6.  Water obtained in this manner was similar
to that under natural conditions when a polluted stream is diluted
by confluence with a clean stream.  Acid mine water that had been
treated at the experimental mine drainage treatment plant at
Hollywood, Pennsylvania, was tested to determine if the quality of
treated effluent was acceptable as judged by the criteria of the
behavioral bioassay.

One-hour observations of cover utilization and activity were made
for each individual fish at each water quality level.  During the
tests, an observer recorded the presence or absence of the fish
being tested in each of the 18 quadrats.  After the observation
period, the total number of seconds the fish spent in the quadrat
containing the artificial cover could be counted.  This parameter
was used as a dependent variable hereafter called cover utilization
and was measured in seconds.  Also counted was the number of times
each fish moved from one quadrat to another.  This served as a
second dependent variable, activity, measured in movements per hour.
The research design called for each species of fish to be tested
at the following water quality levels:
     (1)  natural unpolluted water, pH approximately 7 (control)
     (2)  unpolluted water acidified in the laboratory to pH 6
     (3)  unpolluted water acidified in the laboratory to pH 5
     (4)  unpolluted water acidified in the laboratory to pH 4
     (5)  unpolluted water acidified in the laboratory to pH 3
     (6)  acid mine water diluted with unpolluted water to pH 6
     (7)  acid mine water diluted with unpolluted water to pH 5
     (8)  treated acid mine water
This series of tests was completed for all species except longnose
dace and yearling smallmouth bass which were not tested in treated
acid mine water.  Activity was not recorded for smallmouth bass in
the first series of tests.  Eight fish of each species were tested
at each water quality level.

Prior to observation each fish was allowed a 100-hour period of
acclimation to test water.  The purpose of this acclimation period
was two-fold:  (1) To assure that any initial shock caused by
transfer of the fish into a water of different quality than normal
would have passed and would no longer affect the behavior of the
fish; (2) To begin the tests after an acute toxicity period of 100
hours (Warner, 1967).  By holding the fish for 100 hours and then
conducting the tests, it was assumed that only sublethal concentrations
were being tested.  All species exposed to unpolluted water acidified
to pH 3, and in acid mine water at pH 5 died before the end of the
100-hour period of acclimation.

Included in the 100-hour acclimation period was a 1/2-hour or a
24-hour period of adjustment to the test area of the stream aquarium.
                               24

-------
The purpose of this adjustment period was to give the fish time to
become familiar with the new surroundings of the test chamber before
behavioral observations were made.  The 1/2-hour adjustment period
was used for the first series of smallmouth bass and for longnose
dace.  The erratic behavioral responses exhibited in these tests
suggested that the 1/2-hour adjustment period was not long enough.
The 24-hour adjustment period was used in all subsequent tests.

All fish were placed in the test chamber near the rear of the chamber.
By placing the fish at the rear of the test chamber, each fish
faced upstream to hold its position in the current and was
confronted immediately with the artificial cover.

Before being placed in the test chamber for the adjustment period,
fish were held in separate sections of nearby holding tanks during
the 100-hour period of acclimation to the test water.  The purpose
of holding the fish in individual sections was to reduce the effects
of dominant and submissive behavioral patterns that had been
established before capture in the native streams or after capture
in the laboratory holding tank.  Fish for testing were captured
as close as practical to the time of the test in order to avoid
holding fish in captivity for extended periods of time.  No fish was
used for more than one test.  While held in captivity, fish were
supplied natural foods, but food to which the fish may not have
been accustomed.  Food was seldom eaten.

Fish as nearly uniform as possible in age and size were selected
to reduce behavioral variability due to differences in age and size.
Age and size ranges for each species as well as the tests conducted,
identification of source water, and time of adjustment to the test
chamber, are listed in table 2.

Water quality conditions were monitored throughout the study for
identification of conditions associated with non-normal fish behavior.
Measurements of pH were made with a Beckman Zerometic pH meter
(Beckman Instruments Incorporated, Fullerton, California).  Readings
of pH and temperature were made before and after each test and the
average of the two readings used as the pH or temperature for the
test.  Specific conductance was measured with a Beckman conductivity
meter on a sample of water taken either before or after each test.
Acidity and alkalinity were also measured from water samples taken
either before or after each test.  Sulfates were measured once on
each day of testing.  Total iron, ferrous iron, and aluminum were
measured once for each different water quality level used.

Chemical analyses were carried out using widely accepted methods.
Acidity and alkalinity were determined by titration with a standard
base or acid to an end point denoted by the color change of an

                               25

-------
   Table 2.  Fish ages  and  sizes  and  other specifics of test variations used in the behavioral
             studies.
to
Species Ages
Smallmouth 0
bass

Smallmouth I
bass



Smallmouth I, II,
bass III
Longnose 0, I,
dace II

Brook I, II
trout
Range
of
Lengths
(mm)
76-135


108-165




126-221

68-92


115-170

Range
of
Weights
(Km)
4-28


16-69




26-128

2-7


14-59

Tests
Conducted
Complete series
(activity not
recorded)
All except
treated acid
mine water
(activity not
recorded)
Complete series

All except
treated acid
mine water
Complete series

Water
Source
Galbraith Run


Galbraith Run




Standing Stone
Creek
Galbraith Run


Big Fishing
Creek
Period of
Adjustment
to Test
Chamber
(hrs)
1/2


1/2




24

1/2


24

Period of
Acclimation
to Test
Water
(hrs)
100


100




100

100


100

   Rock bass   I, II.... 82-133   11-41     Complete  series   Juniata River    24
100

-------
indicator.  Sulfates were precipitated with barium chloride, filtered,
ignited, and the residue weighed.  The colorimetric phenanthroline
method was used to determine total iron.  The procedures followed
for these tests are described in Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater (A.P.H.A. et_ al^. , 1971).  Ferric iron and
aluminum were determined as described by Kolthoff et al. (1969)
using ammonium hydroxide to precipitate the oxide of the ion.
                                27

-------
                           SECTION V

                            RESULTS

Analyses of variance revealed there was no relationship between
cover utilization and pH or between activity and pH for any species
tested (Figures 4 through 9 and Appendix Table 9).  Both young-of-
the-year and yearling smallmouth bass appeared to decrease cover
utilization with lower pH (Figures 4 and 5).  Conversely, age I,
II and III smallmouth bass appeared to increase their cover
utilization with lower pH (Figure 6).  Cover utilization of long-
nose dace fluctuated widely at different pH levels (Figure 7).
Cover utilization of brook trout remained approximately constant
through pH 7, 6 and 5 to pH 4 (Figure 8) when it dropped markedly
(although non-significant).  Cover utilization of rock bass
remained consistently high and with small variance at all pH
levels (Figure 9).

Lower pH values also failed to produce any change in the activity
patterns of the fish.  Smallmouth bass, longnose dace and brook
trout showed widely varying activity levels (Figures 10 through 12
and Appendix Table 10).  Rock bass had consistently low activities
and low variance at all pH values (Figure 13 and Appendix Table 10).

A correlation analysis of these data confirms the independence of
each of the two measured behavioral parameters and pH.  Correlation
coefficients and coefficients of determination were calculated for
cover utilization and pH and for activity and pH for all species
tested.  No significant linear correlations were found (Table 3).
This means that there is no significant linear relationship that
exists between the behavioral parameters measured and pH.  The
coefficient of determination gives the fraction of variation in
the dependent variable that can be accounted for by variation
in the independent variable.  In the tests conducted no more than
9 per cent of the variation i in the behavioral parameter could be
accounted for by changes in pH (Table 3).

These statistical tests have shown that the aspects of fish behavior
used in the experiments under the testing conditions are not controlled
by pH.  In order to determine what variable is controlling fish
behavior, a regression analysis was conducted.  Sixteen independent
variables (Table 4) and two dependent variables were measured for
each test as described in the methods section of this paper.  Some
independent variables were significantly correlated with other
independent variables.  Correlation between independent variables
makes separation of the effects of each of the correlated variables
impossible by multiple regression.  Therefore, when independent
variables were significantly correlated, one was chosen for the
analysis and the others were omitted.  For instance, length, weight,
                               29

-------
     23
     O X-N
     M W

   ^ % "*
   & < C
   K N O
   > M O
   O h-) (1)
   U M (0
     H ^
Figure 4.
            4000
            3000 -
            2000 -
            1000 -
               0
                                                           0.92
                                               T^

                                                5
                                         pH
           Cover utilization of  age  0 smallmouth bass in water
           acidified in the laboratory.   F -5 = 2.95. L Ninety- five
           per cent confidence limits are shown.
     2
     O <-N
     l-l W
     H T3
   (X < G
   UNO
   > M O
   O hJ 0)
   O M (0
Figure 5.
            4000 -\
            3000 -
            2000
            1000  -
                                                       F » 2.00
                                     i

                                    6
                                        pH
           Cover utilization of age I smallmouth bass in water
           acidified  in the laboratory.  F _5 » 2.95.  Ninety-five
           per  cent confidence limits are shown.
                                    30

-------
     •z.
     o
        CO
   W N  O
   > IH  O
   O J  0)
   O M  0)
4000 -:
1
3000 -j J-
2000 -
1000 -
t
1
o i ,
U r^
7
"
— r





i 	
6
-f
___]._ 	 -

F »



	 1 	
5

— a."

1.04



i
4
                                         pH


Figure 6.  Cover utilization of  age I,  II   and III smallmouth bass
                                                    .05
                                                          2.95.
in water acidified in the  laboratory.   F
Ninety-five per cent confidence  limits  are°shown.
            4000  n
       W
   UNO

   O i-J fl)
   O M (0
            1000
                                         pH
Figure 7.  Cover utilization of  longnose dace in water acidified in
           the laboratory.  F
                              .05
                        2.95.  Ninety-five per  cent
           confidence limits are shown.
                                   31

-------
     M W
     H *t)
   Pi  M O
   O hJ  M O
   O iJ 0)
   O M (0
4000



3000



2000  -



1000  -
                                                _L
                                                 o
                                                           1.16
                                         pH


Figure  9.  Cover  utilization of rock bass in water acidified in the
            laboratory.   F fl_ - 2.95.  Ninety-five per cent confidence
            limits are shown.
                                    32

-------
     > 4)
     M 6
     H (1)
     O >
     •< Q
             400  -1
             300  -
             200  •
             100
                                                      F -  1.53
Figure 10.  Average activity of  age  I,  II  and  III  smallmouth bass  in
            water acidified in  the  laboratory.a  F
            five per cent confidence  limits  are  snown.
05
     2.95.  Ninety-
        g
             400
             300  -
             200  -
             100
   F - 1.22
                                       pH

Figure 11.  Average activity of longnose dace  in water  acidified  in
            the laboratory.  F    « 2.95.  Ninety-five  per  cent
            confidence limits are shown.
                                   33

-------
             400  -i
                                          F = 2.35
         CO

         4-1

         C



         §

         0)
             300
 200 -
             100  -
               0
                                                             T
                                                 o
                                         PH



Figure 12.  Average activity of brook.trout  in water acidified in the

            laboratory.  F «5 » 2.95.   Ninety-five per cent confidence

            limits are shown.
      >-i  CD
      H  4J
      M  C
      >  CU
      M  €


      y  >
      ^  i
             400
             300
 200 -
 100  -
                                          F =• 0.40
                                                            -o-

                                                            T-
                                         PH




Figure 13.  Average  activity of rock bass in water acidified in the
laboratory.  F Qg - 2.95.

limits are shown.
                                        Ninety-five per cent confidence
                                    34

-------
Table 3.  Correlation coefficients (r) and coefficients of
          determination (r ) between cover utilization and pH
          and between activity and pH for fish tested in water
          acidified in the laboratory.  Significant r  C = .349.
                 Cover utilization and pH     Activity and pH
  Species        	
                       r           r2           r        r2
Smallmouth bass      .256        .066          	      	
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass      .279        .078          	      	
  Age I

Smallmouth bass     -.282        .080         .281     .079
  Age I, II and
  III

Longnose dace       -.282        .054         .272     .074

Brook trout          .307        .094         .092     .008

Rock bass            .085        .007        -.222     .049
                                   35

-------
Table 4.  Variables measured for tests of cover utilization and
          activity.

      1.  pH of the test water

      2.  temperature of the test water

      3.  specific conductance of the test water

      4.  acidity of the test water

      5.  alkalinity of the test water

      6.  total iron concentration in the test water

      7.  ferrous iron concentration in the test water

      8.  ferric iron concentration in the test water

      9.  sulfate concentration in the test water

     10.  aluminum concentration in the test water

     11.  time of the test

     12.  chamber of the stream aquarium where the test was conducted

     13.  age of the test fish

     14.  length of the test fish

     15.  weight of the test fish

     16.  time the fish was held in captivity
                                  36

-------
and age were significantly correlated for each species of fish.
In the multiple regression analysis, length was chosen to represent
the effects of these three variables and the other two were
omitted from the analysis.  Likewise, total iron was chosen to
represent the significantly correlated variables total iron,
ferrous iron, and ferric iron.  Independent variables included
in the regression analysis for each species are listed in table 5.
With all the included variables remaining in the multiple regression
equation, no significant reduction in the total sum of squares
of the dependent variables could be attributed to the combined
effects of the independent variables (Table 6 and Table 7).  This
indicates that variables measured in the tests are not exerting
a significant controlling influence on cover utilization or activity.
Although established as a control variable, the chamber in which a
fish was tested emerged as the most important variable affecting
cover utilization for three species (Table 6) and as the most
important variable affecting activity for one species (Table 7).
The test chamber significantly influenced the cover utilization of
brook trout.  A paired T-test was used to determine if the velocities
in test chamber no. 1 differed from the velocities in test chamber
no. 2.  Velocities were found to be significantly higher in chamber
no. 1 for tests conducted with smallmouth bass ages I, II and III,
brook trout, rock bass and longnose dace, but not for smallmouth
bass age 0 or smallmouth bass age I (Table 8).  Higher velocities
were accompanied by higher cover utilization and lower activity.
The only other variable to emerge more than once as a most important
variable controlling fish behavior was pH.  Cover utilization of
three species and activity of one species was most strongly though
not significantly influenced by pH (Table 6 and Table 7).

Cover utilization and activity of fish were measured in acid mine
water taken from Beech Creek and diluted to the desired pH levels
with water from the home stream of the test fish or with water from
Galbraith Run.  With the exception of results obtained for brook
trout, cover utilization and activity did not differ significantly
from fish tested in the home water (control) alone (Figures 14
through 18 and Appendix Table 11).  The figures include the F-
values obtained in the analysis of variance.

Cover utilization and activity of fish in treated acid mine water
did not vary from cover utilization and activity of fish tested
in water from the home stream of the test fish (Figures 19 through 22
and Appendix Table 12).  The treated water was taken from the mine
drainage treatment plant at Hollywood, Pennsylvania.  Treatment
methods used to purify the raw acid mine water varied for each
species tested, but each included a neutralization process, an
oxidization process and a settling period.
                                37

-------
Table 5.  Independent variables included in the regression analysis
          for each species.  Inclusion of a variable is denoted by X.


Species








X
O.
(U
3
4J
CO
M
0)
a.
£

0)
O
O CO
•H 4->
UH O
•H 3
CJ tJ
0) C
P. O
CO U


^
CO
4J
fi



c
o
M
M

0)
4-1
CO
U-l
rH
3
CO



4J 0)
0) 0
Q) -H
H H

}^
0)
43
4J 0
CO CO
0) f
H U


4-1
00
a
a)

(U.
J3
(!)
ti
•r(
H
>>
4-1
•H
•H
4->
tx
CO
O

c
•H
Smallmouth bass    XX            X         XXX
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass    XX            X         XXX
  Age I

Smallmouth bass    XX                      X     X    X     X
  Ages I, II and
  III

Longnose dace      XXX               X     X    X     X

Brook trout        XX                 XX     XXX

Rock bass          XX                      X     X    X     X
                                   38

-------
Table 6.  Results of multiple regression analysis using cover
          utilization as the dependent variable.
  Species
Number of    Regression
independent  analysis     r
variables    results
                     Most
                     important
                     independent
                     variable
Smallmouth bass
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass
  Age I

Smallmouth bass
  Age I, II and
  III

Longnose dace

Brook trout

Rock bass
    7

    7

    6
               n.s.
               n.s.
               n.s.
         .409  .167
                        .439  .193
PH
                         pH
         .480  .230   Test chamber
n.s.     .431  .186      pH

n.s.     .577  .333   Test chamber

n.s.     .530  .281   Test chamber
                                   39

-------
Table 7.  Results of multiple regression analysis using activity
          as the dependent variable.
  Species
Number of    Regression
independent  analysis     r
variables    results
                  Most
                  important
                  independent
                  variable
StrialImouth bass
  Ages I, II and
  III
               n.s.
       .456   .208    Test  chamber
Longnose dace
Brook trout
Rock bass
7
7
6
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
.515
.546
.402
.265
.298
.161
PH
Length
Test time
 Table  8.  Average velocities (cm/sec.)  in the test chamber for each
          species tested.
    Species
   Chamber 1
Chamber 2
Faired T-test
results
 Smallmouth bass        16.3
  Age  0

 Smallmouth bass        16.3
  Age  I

 Smallmouth bass        13.6
  Ages I, II  and
  III

 Longnose dace          9.7

 Brook  trout            13.6

 Rock bass             13.6
                     16.7


                     16.7


                     11.5



                      8.1

                     11.5

                     11.5
                     n.s.


                     n.s.


                  p < .01



                  p < .05

                  p < .01

                  p < .01
                                   40

-------
                  4000 -i
                               F = 0.18
55 x-s
O 

M O 8n3 0)' H (0 4000 - 3000 -I 2000 - 1000 - 0.28 pH 7 unpolluted pH 6 polluted WATER TYPE Figujre 14. Average cover utilization of age 0 and age I smallmouth bass in unpolluted water (control) and in water polluted with acid mine drainage and diluted to pH 6 with unpolluted water. F Q_ - 4.60. Ninety-five per cent confidence limits are shown1 41


-------
  6 /-s
  M W
  H T3

W N) O
> M O
O J Q)
O M W
                 4000  -
                 3000 -
                 2000 -
                 1000 -
                                                  0.12
                            pH 7
                        unpolluted
                               pH 6
                            polluted
                              WATER TYPE
           M  C
           >  0)
           M  B
           B  5!
           <  §
                  AOO -
                  300 -
                  200 -
         100 -
                                   1.99
                            pH 7
                        unpolluted
                               pH 6
                            polluted
                              WATER TYPE

Figure 15.  Average cover utilization and activity of age I, II and
            III smallmouth bass in unpolluted water  (control) and in
            water pplluted with acid mine drainage and diluted to
            pH 6 with unpolluted water.  F Q_ = 4.60.  Ninety-five
            per cent confidence limits are*shown.
                                  42

-------
  O *->
  M 0)
  t"* *XD

W NI O
> l-i O
O i-J (U
O M W
                 4000 n
                  3000 -
                  2000 -
                 1000 -
                                F =  0.58
                             pH 7
                         unpolluted
                               pH  6
                            polluted
                               WATER TYPE
           >*  V)
           H  4J

           g  g

           H  0)
           O  >
                  400
                   300 -
         200 -
                  100 -
                    0
                                    F - 0.00
                             pH 7
                        unpolluted
                               pH  6
                            polluted
                              WATER TYPE

Figure 16.  Average cover utilization  and  activity of longnose dace in
            unpolluted water  (control)  and in water polluted with acid
            mine drainage and diluted  to pH 6 with unpolluted water.
            F __ » 4.60.  Ninety-five  per  cent confidence limits are
             • 05
            shown.
                                   43

-------
n uuu -
3000 -
COVER
UTILIZATION
(seconds)
M N3
O 0
o o
o o o
i i i










-L


X


i i
pH 7 pH 6
unpolluted polluted
                                                  6.36
                              WATER TYPE
              >
                   400 -i
                   300 -
                   200 -
                   100-
                     0
    F - 3.73
                            pH 7
                        unpolluted
   pH 6
polluted
                              WATER TYPE

Figure 17.  Average cover utilization and activity of brook trout
            in unpolluted water (control) and in water polluted with
            acid mine drainage and diluted to pH 6 with unpolluted
            water.  F fl_ =» 4.60.  Ninety-five per cent confidence
            limits are shown.

-------
            M W
            H *O
            < C
            N O
            M O
            nJ (U
            M M
4000 -|
3000-
2000-
1000-
n—
F




-3T















                             pH 7        pH 6
                         unpolluted  . polluted


                               WATER TYPE
            >
            B §
            o >
                    4001
                    300-
                    200-
                    100-
    F -  1.87
                             pH 7
                         unpolluted
   pH 6
polluted
                               WATER TYPE


Figure 18.  Average cover utilization and activity of rock bass in
            unpolluted water (control) and in water polluted with acid
            mine drainage and diluted to pH 6 with unpolluted water.
            F nc " 4.60*  Ninety-five per cent confidence limits are
             • u j
            shown.
                                   45

-------
           IS
           O x-x
           M W
           H •«
         «  M O
         O J Q)
         U M (0
                  40001
                  3000 -I
2000 -I
                  1000-1
                      F = 0.45
                        unpolluted    treated acid
                          water       mine  water


                                WATER TYPE
Figure 19.  Average cover utilization for age 0 smallmouth bass in
            unpolluted water  (control)  and in treated acid mine
            water.  F 0_ « 4.60.   Ninety-five per cent confidence
            limits are shown.
                                   46

-------
             M CO
           -> ^ *°
           os <: c
           W N O
           > M O
           O hJ 0)
           U M (0
                   4000
                   3000 -
2000 -
                   1000
                      0
                               1.55
                       f
                         unpolluted

                           water
                   treated acid

                   mine water
                                 WATER TYPE
             > ID
             M a
400-
300-
200-
100-
0-
F - 1,01

•
_[

1 rF,
' • I
unpolluted treated ac]
water mine water
                                WATER TYPE


Figure 20.  Average cover utilization and  activity for age I,  II and

            III smallmouth bass in unpolluted water (control)  and in
            treated acid mine water.   F  ._ = 4.60.   Ninety-five  per
            cent confidence limits are snown.
                                   47

-------
                  4000 i
                  3000 H
             53
             O
               W

           « 3 •§  2000
           UNO
           > M O
           O n3 • w
            H *J
            > Q)
                   400 =•
                   300i
                   200 n
               i   100-
        F - 2.95
                        unpolluted    treated  acid

                          water       mine water


                                WATER TYPE
Figure 21.  Average cover utilization and activity  for brook trout  in

            unpolluted water  (control) and  in  treated acid mine water.

            F _, - 4.60.  Ninety-five per cent confidence limits are
             • \JJ
            shown.
                                   48

-------
             O ^
             JH W
             H t3
           os < e
           W N O
           > M O
           O >-) 0)
           O M 03
             KS
             &!g
             M S
4000-
3000-
2000-
1000-
o-1




-£-







F =



= 1.93



unpolluted treated acid
water mine water
                    400
                    300-
200-
                    100-
                                  WATER TYPE
                     F • 1.80
                         unpolluted   treated acid
                           water      mine water


                                 WATER TYPE


Figure 22.  Average cover utilization and activity  for rock bass  in
            unpolluted water  (control)  and in treated  acid  mine

            water.  F Q5 = 4.60.  Ninety-five per cent confic'ence

            limits are shown.
                                   49

-------
It was necessary to hold some age 0 and age I smallmouth bass for
a period of one month or more prior to using them in a behavioral
test.  This was necessary because in cold water smallmouth bass
go beneath the rock substrate in streams (Munther, 1970).  During
this period of inactivity, the fish can be taken with an electro-
shocker only with great difficulty.  Therefore, before the onset
of cold weather a supply of fish was taken to be tested during the
period when freshly caught fish were not available.  These bass
held more than 15 days utilized the cover less than bass held less
than 15 days (Figure 23 and Appendix Table 13).  The fish held more
than 15 days were tested in laboratory acidified water at pH 6.
When it was found that the behavior of fish held in captivity was
not comparable to those held a short time, the tests were deemed
unacceptable and new tests were conducted with fresh fish.

The behavioral tests described were originally set up to maximize
the number of fish tested with the equipment available.  The
critical item determining the number of fish that could be tested
was the stream aquarium.  Using a 1/2-hour period of adjustment to
the test chamber and a 1-hour period of observation, five fish per
day could be tested in one test chamber by one observer.  However,
using only a 1/2-hour adjustment period, a fish tested under
identical conditions displayed widely varying behavior.  In an
effort to reduce that variation, a series of eight longnose dace
were allowed a 24-hour period of adjustment within the test chamber
of the stream aquarium.  Cover utilization of these fish increased
and activity decreased (Figure 24 and Appendix Table 14).  Although
the change in behavior was not statistically significant, it was
felt that the 24-hour period of adjustment before making behavior
observations would allow a more characteristic measure of the
"normal" behavior of the fish.  Therefore, the entire series of
smallmouth bass tests was repeated for bass ages I and older using a
24-hour period of adjustment rather than a 1/2-hour period of
adjustment.  These tests confirmed that cover utilization is
higher and activity lower for fish allowed 24 hours to adjust to
the test chamber (Figure 25 and Appendix Table 14).  The 24-hour
adjustment period was then used for all subsequent tests to gain
reliability at the expense of time.
                               50

-------
  O X-x
  M  (/)
  £-H *O

OS <  C
W N  O
> M  O
O hJ  0)
O M  (0
                             4000 1
                             3000
                             2000-
                             1000
                               F - 5.62
                                        HOLDING TIME

                                           (days)
8
                      O -^
                      M M
                      H -0
                      < d
                      NO
                      M O
                      hJ 0)
                      M CD
                             4000-
                             3000-
         2000-
                             1000-
                               F = 3.56
                                        HOLDING TIME

                                           (days)


          Figure 23.  Average  cover  utilization for age 0 and age I smallmouth
                      bass held  for  less  than 15  days and for more than 15 days.

                      Tests were conducted  in unpolluted water acidified to pH 6
                      in the laboratory.   F
                                            .05
                              4.60.   Ninety-five per cent
                      confidence limits  are  shown.
                                             51

-------
            O /-N
            M CO
            H "O
          BJ << a
          UNO
          > M O
          O hJ 41
          O M 0)
            > 0)
            M 6
            H 0)
            O >
40001



3000-



2000-



1000-
                                                  3.39
                          1/2-hour     24-hour
                                 i

                         ADJUSTMENT  PERIOD
                   400-i
                   300 H
 200 H
                   100 H
                          4.39
                         1/2-hour
                    24-hour
                        ADJUSTMENT PERIOD


Figure 24.  Average cover utilization and  activity  for  longnose  dace

            with either a 1/2-hour or a  24-hour period  of  adjustment
            to the test .chamber.  Fish were  tested  in unpolluted water

            at pH 7.  F 05 * 4<6°*  Ninety-five per cent confidence

            limits are shown.
                                    52

-------
            53
            O x-v
            M (0
            H t3
          tf < C
          UNO
          > M O
          O >J Q>
          O M CO
            H v-'
                  4000 1
                  3000 -
2000 -
                  1000 -
                                15.33
                           1/2-hour    24-hour


                         ADJUSTMENT PERIOD
Figure 25.  Average cover utilization for smallmouth bass of ages I
            and older with  either  a 1/2-hour or a 24-hour period of
            adjustment to the  test chamber.   Fish were tested in
            unpolluted water acidified in the laboratory to pH 7
            through 4.  F ni- 2.08.   Ninety-five per cent confidence
                         . uj.
            limits are shown.
                                   53

-------
                           SECTION VI

                           DISCUSSION

Prior to conducting the tests, three possible behavioral responses
to increasing acidity could have been hypothesized.  The fish
may gradually alter its behavioral patterns under more acid conditions
or a sudden, large change in behavior could occur at some threshold
level.  Gradual alteration in behavior under increasing acidity
could occur in two directions.  The response to increased acidity
could be an increase in cover utilization and decreased activity.
Such a response could be expected to conserve the energy of the
fish for physiological adjustment to acidity.  If the response to
increased acidity was one of trying to escape, cover utilization
would decrease and activity increase.  The avoidance tests that
have been done by Jones (196A), Ishio (1965), Sprague (1964, 1968)
and others indicate this latter type of response.

A third possibility is that instead of a gradual change in behavior
fish would exhibit a sudden behavioral change at some threshold
concentration.  If the fish were physiologically capable of
adjustment, slight change in acidity should cause no change in
behavior but instead would be compensated for by physiological
mechanisms.  At the point where physiological adjustment could no
longer compensate, a breakdown of normal activity patterns would
occur.  In this case, cover utilization and activity would remain
at normal levels until some threshold of toxicity was reached when
cover utilization would increase or decrease and be accompanied
by a decrease or increase respectively in activity.

Fish in these experiments were observed to follow the behavioral
patterns above when exposed to low pH.  Age 0 and age I smallmouth
bass exhibited decreasing cover utilization with increase in
acidity.  Age I, II and III smallmouth bass showed increasing
cover utilization.  Brook trout maintained a consistent cover
utilization until pH 4, then, as hypothesized cover utilization
decreased.  Unexpected behavioral patterns also were exhibited.
Longnose dace showed widely fluctuating cover utilization with
changing pH and rock bass maintained an unchanging and consistently
high cover utilization regardless of the pH.

Activity patterns of fish tested also varied.  Age I, II and III
smallmouth bass and longnose dace displayed a decrease in activity
with increasing acidity.  Brook trout activity was erratic with
increasing acidity.  Rock bass activity did not change from its
very low initial level even when the pH was reduced to 4.0.
                                55

-------
Longer acclimation times (24 versus 1/2 hours) failed to reduce
dramatically the variation of behavior exhibited by fish tested
under identical circumstances.  Coefficients of variability,
the sample standard deviation expressed as a per cent of the
sample mean, for fish tested in unpolluted water generally fell
within a range of 50 to 75 per cent.  This is a much higher
value than Haines and Butler (1969) found with juvenile smallmouth
bass under similar conditions.  Since all fish were treated equally,
it must be assumed the high variability shown in these tests is
a reflection of normal biological variability present in a wild
population.  That variability could have been magnified to a higher
level than observed by Haines and Butler (1969) by the imposition
of a more artificail testing apparatus.  Also, Haines and Butler
held fish longer than in these studies and used the same fish
repeatedly with a series of different cover types.  Perhaps their
treatment made their fish somewhat removed from the wild state.
Normal variability may have been suppressed.

High variability within treatments is undesirable.  Future experi-
ments along these lines may avoid high variability by using fish
taken from a hatchery rather than wild fish.  Hatchery fish
would also be disturbed less by the artificial testing environment
and handling than would wild fish.  However, the possibility
must be considered that some strains of hatchery trout would not
respond to cover.

Utilization of cover, except for brook trout, and activity for
all species were not significantly changed from normal when fish
were exposed to water polluted with acid mine drainage and diluted
to pH 6.  Treated acid mine water also failed to cause a change in
the behavior of the fish.  These results must be interpreted to
mean that the polluted and treated waters were not toxic enough to
cause a behavioral change.

Warner et al. (1966) built a strong case for the use of behavioral
criteria.  Their argument was stated in the introduction of this
paper.  Sprague  (1971) has not agreed with Warner et_ aL^. (1966).
He questioned the ecological significance of behavioral changes.
His contention is that a behavioral change may not be harmful to
the population.  Instead, it may be within the range of normal1
adjustments of the fish and not ecologically detrimental.  A
counter argument can be made that cover utilization and activity
are behavioral responses of ecological significance.  Any
reduction in cover utilization or increase in activity would be
detrimental to a fish for at least two reasons.  First, reduced
use of cover means a stream fish must spend more time holding against
the current.  This requires energy which must be compensated for
by increased food intake.  In some cases food is the limiting
                               56

-------
factor to a fish population.  Any increased need for food would,
therefore, be detrimental to the population.  Increased activity
would also come at a greater cost in energy.  Second, anything
which requires a fish to leave cover makes that fish more
susceptible to predators.   Increased activity, therefore,
enhances the prey-predator encounters.  Objections of some
authors to using change in a single index as a bioassay criterion
because it may or may not have ecological significance, is not
applicable in the case of cover utilization and activity.  Future
behavioral tests should attempt to demonstrate the ecological
significance of the behavioral parameters being used.

Behavioral bioassay is not applicable for substances to which
fish do not respond.  Certain fish poisons such as antimycin would
fall into this category  (Lennon and Berger, 1970).  The fish are
unable to detect the poison, do not try to escape from it, and
are killed by it.  This may be the reason that behavior in tests
described here failed to change.  Perhaps the fish failed to
reflect any behavioral stress even though physiological stress
was occurring.  This must be considered unlikely in light of
Ishio's work (Ishio, 1965).  He found that fish easily detected
and avoided hydrogen ions in both high and low concentrations.
                                57

-------
                          SECTION VII

                        ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to express appreciation to graduate students — especially
Ron Klauda, and to George Kauffman for their help  in this research.
Dr. H. L. Lovell, Director of Mine Drainage Research at The Pennsylvania
State University, cooperated fully in supplying  treated acid mine water
needed for the study.

Appreciation is also extended to Elaine  Heilman  of the Mine Drainage
Research Laboratory who assisted in  the  water  analysis.
                                59

-------
                           SECTION VIII

                            REFERENCES

 1.  American Public Health Association, American Water Works
     Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation.  Standard
     methods for the examination of water and wastewater.  13th ed.,
     Washington, D. C. 874 p.  (1971).

 2.  Appalachian Regional Commission.  Acid mine drainage in Appalachia,
     Appendix C:  The incidence and formation of mine drainage
     pollution.  45 p.; Attachments A-E  (1969).

 3.  Appalachian Regional Commission.  Acid mine drainage in
     Appalachia.  U. S. Government Printing Office. 126 p. (1969).

 4.  Baker, Robert A. and Albert G. Wilshire.  Microbiological factor
     in acid mine drainage formation:  a pilot plant study.
     Environmental Science and Technology 4: 401-407 (1970).

 5.  Biesecker, J. E. and J. R. George.  Stream quality in Appalachia
     as related to coal mine drainage, 1965.  U.S.G.S. Circular 526,
     27 p. (1966).

 6.  Burdick, G. E.  Use of bioassays in determining levels of toxic
     wastes harmful to aquatic organisms.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.
     96(Suppl.): 7-12 (1967).

 7.  Doudoroff, P. and Max Katz.  Critical review of the literature
     on the toxicity of industrial wastes to fish.  I. Alkalies, acids,
     and inorganic gases.  Sewage and Industrial Wastes 22(11):
     1432-1458 (1950).

 8.  Doudoroff, P. and Max Katz.  Critical review of literature on the
     toxicity of industrial wastes to fish.  II. The metals as salts.
     Sewage and Industrial Wastes 25(7): 802-839 (1953).

 9.  Doudoroff, P. et^ ail.  Bioassay methods for the evaluation of acute
     toxicity of industrial wastes to fish.  Sewage and Industrial
     Wastes 23: 1380-1397 (1951).

10.  Ellis, M. M.  Detection and measurement of stream pollution.
     U. S. Department of Commerce, Bull. Bureau of Fisheries, No. 22,
     28: 365-437 (1937).

11.  European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission Working Party on
     Water Quality Criteria for European Freshwater Fish.  Water
     quality criteria for European freshwater fish.  Report on extreme
     pH values and inland fisheries.  EIFAC Tech. Paper 4: 1-24 (1968).

                                 61

-------
12.  Raines, Terry A. and Robert L. Butler.  Responses of yearling
     smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) to artificial shelter in
     a stream aquarium.  J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 26: 21-31 (1969).

13.  Hartman, G. F.  Observations on behavior of juvenile brown trout in
     a stream aquarium during winter and spring.  J. Fish. Res. Bd.
     Can. 20: 769-787 (1963).

14.  Henderson, Croswell.  Application factors to be applied to
     bioassays for the safe disposal of toxic wastes,  p. 31-37.
     In U.S.D.H.E.W. Biological problems in water pollution.  Public
     Health Service (1957).

15.  Henderson, Croswell and Clarence M. Tarzwell.  Bio-assays for
     control of industrial effluents.  Proc. 12th Industrial Waste
     Conference.  Engineering Bulletin, Purdue University 42: 123-144
     (1957).

16.  Hill, Ronald D.  Mine drainage treatment:  state of the art and
     research needs.  U.S.D.I. Federal Water Pollution Control
     Administration. 99 p. (1968)

17.  Ishio, S.  Behavior of fish exposed to toxic substances.  Adv.
     in Water Pol. Res. 1: 19-33 (1965).

18.  Jones, J. R. E.  Fish and river pollution, p. 254-310, In
     Louis Klein, River Pollution. II. Causes and Effects, Butterworths,
     London (1962).

19.  Jones, J. R. E.  Fish and river pollution.  Butterworths and
     Company, London 203 p. (1964).

20.  Katz, Max.  The biological and ecological effects of acid mine
     drainage with particular emphasis to the waters of the Appalachian
     Region.  Acid mine drainage in Appalachia, Appendix F. 65 p.
     (1969).

21.  Kim, A. G.  An experimental study of ferrous iron oxidation in
     acid mine water, p. 40-46.  In ORSANCO, Second Symposium on coal
     mine drainage research.  Carnegie Mellon Univ. (1968).

22.  Kolthoff, I. M. _et _al.  Quantitative chemical analysis.  4th ed.
     The MacMillan Company, London 1199 p.  (1969).

23.  Lennon, Robert E. and Bernard L. Berger.  A resume on field
     applications of antimycin A to control fish.  Investigations in
     Fish Control, U.S.D.I. No. 40: 19 p. (1970).
                                 62

-------
24.  Lovell, Harold L.  Experience with biochemical-iron-oxidation
     limestone-neutralization process.  In ORSANCO, Fourth Symposium
     on coal mine drainage research.  Carnegie Mellon Univ. (MS).

25.  McKee, J. E. and H. W. Wolf.  Water quality criteria.  California
     Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento. 548 p. (1963).

26.  McKim, J. M. and D. A. Benoit.  Effects of long-term exposures
     to copper on survival, growth, and reproduction of brook trout
     (Salvelinus fontinalis).  J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 28: 655-662
     (1971).

27.  Mount, Donald I. and Charles E. Stephan.  A method for establishing
     acceptable toxicant limits for fish — malathion and the butoxyethanol
     ester of 24-D.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 96: 185-193  (1967).

28.  Mount, Donald I. and Charles E. Stephan.  Chronic toxicity of copper
     to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) in soft water. J. Fish.
     Res. Bd. Can. 26: 2449-2457 (1969).

29.  Munther, G. L.  Movement and distribution of smallmouth bass in
     the middle Snake River.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 99: 44-53 (1970).

30.  National Technical Advisory Committee.  Water quality criteria.
     Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.  Government
     Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 243 p. (1968).

31.  Pennsylvania State Planning Board.  Pennsylvania water supplement.
     In U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Development of water resources
     in Appalachia.  Part V, Chapter 9: 98 p. (1968).

32.  Shumate, K. S. et^ al.  Development of a conceptual model for pyrite
     oxidation systems, p. 7-22.  In Ohio State University Research
     Foundation, Acid mine drainage formation and abatement, Water
     Pollution Control Research Series, E.P.A. (1971).

33.  Singer, Philip C. and Werner Stumm.  Kinetics of the oxidation of
     ferrous iron, p. 12-34.  In ORSANCO, Second Symposium on coal
     mine drainage research.  Carnegie Mellon Univ. (1968).

34.  Singer, Philip C. and Werner Stumm.  Oxygenation of ferrous iron:
     the rate-determining step in the formation of acidic mine
     drainage.  Water Pollution Control Research Series, F.W.P.C.A.
     (1969).

35.  Singer, Philip C. and Werner Stumm.  Acidic mine drainage:  the
     rate-determining step. Science 167: 1121-1123 (1970).
                                 63

-------
36.  Sprague, J. B.  Avoidance of copper-zinc solutions by young salmon
     in the laboratory.  J. Water Pol. Cont. Fed. 36: 990-1004 (1964).

37.  Sprague, J. B.  Avoidance reactions of rainbow trout to zinc
     sulphate solutions.  Water Research 2: 367-372 (1968).

38.  Sprague, J. B.  Measurement of pollution toxicity to fish — III
     sublethal effects and "safe" concentrations.  Water Research
     5: 245-266 (1971).

39.  Temple, Kenneth L. and W. A. Koehler.  Drainage from bituminous
     coal mines.  West Virginia University Bull., Engineering Experiment
     Station Research Bull. No. 25: 35 p. (1954).

40.  U. S. Department of the Interior.  Federal Water Pollution Control
     Administration.  Stream pollution by coal mine drainage in
     Appalachia.  261 p. (1969).

41.  Waller, William T. and John Cairns, Jr.  The use of fish movement
     patterns to monitor zinc in water.  Water Research 6: 257-269 (1972)

42.  Warner, Richard E.  Bio-assays for microchemical environmental
     contaminants with special reference to water supplies.  Bull, of
     the WHO 36: 181-207 (1967).

43.  Warner, Richard E., Karen K. Peterson and Leon Borgman.  Behavioral
     pathology in fish:  quantitative study of sublethal pesticide
     toxication.  J. Appl. Ecol. 3(Suppl.): 223-247 (1966).

44.  Warren, Charles E.  Biology and water pollution control. W. B.
     Saunders Company, Philadelphia. 434 p. (1971).
                                 64

-------
                           SECTION IX

                           APPENDICES

                                                         Page No.

Table 9   Average cover utilization in seconds ± one
          standard error of the mean for fish tested
          at different pH levels in water acidified
          in the laboratory.                                66

Table 10  Average activity in movements per hour ±
          one standard error of the mean for fish
          tested at different pH levels in water
          acidified in the laboratory.                      67

Table 11  Average cover utilization and activity ±
          one standard error of the mean for fish
          tested in unpolluted water and in water
          polluted with acid tnine drainage and
          diluted to the desired pH with unpolluted
          water.                                            68

Table 12  Average cover utilization and activity ±
          one standard error of the mean for fish
          tested in unpolluted water and in treated
          acid mine water.                                  69

Table 13  Average cover utilization in seconds ± one
          standard error of the mean for smallmouth bass
          age 0 and age I held in captivity for less
          than 15 days and for greater than 15 days.
          Tests were conducted in water acidified in
          the laboratory to pH 6.                           70

Table 14  Average cover utilization and activity ± one
          standard error of the mean for longnose dace
          and smallmouth bass with either a 1/2-hour
          or a 24-hour period of adjustment to the test
          chamber.  Longnose dace were tested in
          unpolluted water at pH 7 and smallmouth
          bass were tested in water acidified in the
          laboratory to pH 7 through 4.                     71
                               65

-------
Table 9.  Average cover utilization in seconds   one standard error of the mean for fish
          tested at different pH levels in water acidified in the laboratory.
                                                  pH
   Species
                                                                 Analysis
                                                                 of  variance
                                                                 results
Smallmouth bass
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass
  Age I

Smallmouth bass
  Age I, II
  and III

Longnose dace

Brook trout

Rock bass'
1904 ± 480   1863 ± 500    1778 ± 455   1028 ± 233     a


2965 ± 257   1948 ± 446    1983 ± 387   1935 ± 311     a


2745 ± 366   3176 ± 403    3221 ± 316   3528 ±65     a



2052 ± 598   1329 ± 572    2782 ± 431   2625 ± 520     a

2040 ± 549   2178 ± 599    2010 ± 606    478 ± 447     a

3544 ±  40   3541 ±  56    3350 ± 163   3555 ±45     a
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
                                                                                      n.s.
a.   Lethal to all fish within the 100-hour period of acclimation to the test watei.

-------
ON
-j
    Table 10. Average activity in movements per hour ± one standard error of the mean  for  fish

              tested at different pH levels in water acidified in the laboratory.
Species

Smallmouth bass
Ages I , II
and III
Longnose dace
Brook trout
Rock bass


7
71 ± 40


123 ± 46
178 ± 92
3 ± 2


6
14 ± 11
-"-

177 ± 84
14 ± 8
5 ± 4
PH

5
20 ± 15


79 ± 33
29 ± 13
8 ± 5


4 3
13 ± 10 a


43 ±24 a
141 ±51 a
13 ± 13 a
Analysis
of variance
results
n.s.


n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
    a.  Lethal to all fish within the 100-hour period of acclimation to the test water.

-------
     Table  11. Average  cover  utilization and  activity ± one standard error of the mean for fish
              tested in  unpolluted  water and in water polluted with acid mine drainage and
              diluted  to the desired pH with unpolluted water.
        Species
                 Cover Utilization
                      (seconds)
                      Water Type
                  pBTT         pH~5
                  unpolluted   polluted
                  (control)	
                                                 Analysis
                                                 of  variance
                                                 results	
                                               Activity
                                          (movements per hour)

                                            Water Type
                                        pH 7         pH 6
                                        unpolluted   polluted
                                        (control)	
           Analysis
           of variance
           results
cr>
oo
Smallmouth bass
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass
  Age I

Smallmouth bass
  Ages I, 11 and
  III

Longnose dace

Brook trout

Rock bass
1904 ± 480   1618 ±467      n.s.


2965 ± 257   2724 ± 372      n.s.


2745 ± 366   2938 ± 434      n.s.



2052 ± 598   1470 ± 465      n.s.

2040 ± 549   3449 ± 102

3544 ±  40   3600 ±   0      n.s.
                                                                71  ±  40
13 ±  7
n.s.
                                                               123  ±  46     125 ± 40       n.s.

                                                  p  <  .05       178  ±  92       1 ±  1       n.s.
                                                                 3  ±   2
 0 ±  0
                                                                                     n.s.

-------
ON
    Table 12. Average cover utilization and activity  ± one  standard  error of the mean for fish
              tested in unpolluted water and in treated  acid mine water.
                     Cover Utilization
                          (seconds)
                                                               Activity
                                                          (movements per hour)
Species
Water
pH 7
unpolluted
(control)
Type


Treated acid
mine water
Analysis
of variance
results
Water
pH 7
unpolluted
(control)
Type


Treated acid
mine water
Analysis
of variance
results
Smallmouth bass
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass
  Ages I, II
  and III

Brook trout

Rock bass
1904 ± 480   1436 ± 1192     n.s.


2745 ± 366   3229 ±  308     n.s.



2040 ± 549   2811 ±  440     n.s.

3544 ±  40   3600 ±    0     n.s.
                                                               71  ± 40      28  ±  26



                                                             178  ±92      18  ±  17

                                                                3  ± 2       0  ±   0
n.s.



n.s.

n.s.

-------
Table 13. Average cover utilization in seconds ± one standard
          error of the mean for smallmouth bass age 0 and age I
          held in captivity for less than 15 days and for greater
          than 15 days.  Tests were conducted in water acidified
          in the laboratory to pH 6.
                          Holding Time                 .  .   .
   Species         	!	        Analysis
    v              less than      greater than        of variance
	15 days	15 -days	results	

Smallmouth bass    1863 ± 500      629 ± 1A5            p < .05
  Age 0

Smallmouth bass    1948 ± 446      948 ±287              n.s.
  Age I
                                    70

-------
Table 14.  Average cover utilization and activity ± one standard error of the mean for longnose
          dace and smallmouth bass with either a 1/2-hour or a 24-hour period of adjustment
          to the test chamber.  Longnose dace were tested in unpolluted water at pH 7 and
          smallmouth bass were tested in water acidified in the laboratory to pH 7 through 4.
   Species
Cover Utilization
     (seconds)

  Adjustment Period
                    1/2-hour
               24-hour
Analysis
of variance
results
     Activity
(movements per hour)

  Adjustment Period
1/2-hour
24-hour
Analysis
of variance
results
Longnose dace
Smallmouth bass
2052 ± 598
2207 ± 187
3264 ± 275
3167 ± 158
n.s.
p < .01
123 ±46 21 ± 15 n.s.
  Ages I and
  older

-------
PART II:  THE EFFECTS OF ACID MINE
          DRAINAGE ON FISH POPULATIONS
                    by

  Edwin L. Cooper and Charles C. Wagner
                 73

-------
                            ABSTRACT

Fish collections and water quality analyses, taken at the same sites
which were distributed systematically throughout the watersheds in
Pennsylvania, were used to determine the effect of different levels
of acid mine drainage on the presence or absence of fish populations.
Common fish species, normally distributed over several watersheds,
were absent where there was severe acid mine drainage.  Small clean-
water tributaries in these severely affected areas contained diverse
fish populations.

From the list of 116 species of fishes found in Pennsylvania, 10
species exhibited some tolerance to acid mine drainage (fish were
present at pH values of 5.5 or less).  With the exception of chain
pickerel, brook trout and largemouth bass, these 10 species are
unimportant as game fishes.  An additional 38 species have been
found at pH values between 5.6 and 6.4 and the remaining 68 species
were found only at pH levels above 6.4.  Such a comparison indicates
a rather broad threshold level of tolerance to acid mine drainage,
with severe degradation occurring at pH levels between 4.5 and 5.6.

This report was submitted in partial fulfillment of project number
WP-01539-01(N)1 under the partial sponsorship of the Office of
Research and Monitoring, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
D. C.
                                75

-------
                           CONTENTS

Section

  I           Conclusions

  II          Recommendations                                 85

  III         Introduction                                    87

  IV          Methods and Materials                           89
                  Sources of Information
                  Fish, Collections
                  Water Analyses
                  Computer Analyses

  V           Results and Discussion                          95
                  Distribution of Fishes in Pennsylvania
                  Distribution of Acid Mine Drainage
                  Effect of pH and Acidity on Fish
                    Populations
                  Tolerance of Individual Fish Species
                    to pH Levels
                  General Discussion of Acid Tolerance
                    by Fishes

  VI          Acknowledgments                                121

  VII         References                                     123
                                77

-------
                             FIGURES

                                                             PAGE

 1       Watershed map of Pennsylvania showing stations
         at which one or more fish species were collected
         (1957 through 1970)                                  90

 2       Watershed map of Pennsylvania showing stations
         at which no fish were taken and in which the pH
         was less than 5.5 (1957 through 1970)                91

 3       Distribution map of the river chub (Nocomis
         micropogon) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds     101

 4       Distribution map of the satinfin shiner (Notropis
         analostanus) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds    102

 5       Distribution map of the common shiner (Notropis
         cornutus) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds       103

 6       Distribution map of the spotfin shiner (Notropis
         spilopterus) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds    104

 7       Distribution map of the blacknose dace (Rhinichthys
         atratulus) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds      105

 8       Distribution map of the creek chub (Semotilus
         atromaculatus) in Pennsylvania by major
         watersheds                                          106

 9       Distribution map of the white sucker (Catostomus
         commersoni) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds     107

10       Distribution map of the pumpkinseed (Lepomis
         gibbosus) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds       108

11       Distribution map of the mottled sculpin (Cottus
         bairdi) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds

12       Distribution map of the slimy sculpin (Cottus
         cognatus) in Pennsylvania by major watersheds       HO

13       The effect of pH on the presence or absence of
         fishes in streams of Pennsylvania.  Stations at
         which fish were present are designated by
         solid bars                                          112
                                 79

-------
                            FIGURES

                                                             PAGE

14       The relationship between pH and acidity and
         their combined effect on the presence or
         absence of fishes in streams of
         Pennsylvania                                        113
                                80

-------
                            TABLES

No.                                                        Page

 1     List of fish species collected in Pennsylvania
       waters during the period 1957 through 1970           96

 2     Order of appearance of 48 fish species with
       decreasing hydrogen-ion concentration.  In
       parentheses are the number of species present
       up to and including the pH indicated.  The 68
       additional species listed in Table 1 were
       never found at a pH below 6.5                       114

 3     Fishes occurring in waters at different pH
       values, arranged in order of decreased
       tolerance to hydrogen-ion concentration.
       Based on 68 collection sites ranging from
       pH 4.6 to 6.4; each species taken in at
       least 9 sites                                       115

 4     Fishes occurring in waters at different pH
       values, arranged in order of decreased
       tolerance to hydrogen-ion concentration.
       Based on 68 collection sites ranging from
       pH 4.6 to 6.4; each speciesstakes in 4 to
       7 sites                                             116

 5     Fishes occurring in waters at different pH
       values, arranged in order of decreased
       tolerance to hydrogen-ion concentration.
       Based on 68 collection sites ranging from
       pH 4.6 to 6.4; each species taken in 1 to
       3 sites                                             117
                              81

-------
                           SECTION I

                          CONCLUSIONS

1.  Mine acid drainage has severely affected fish populations in
several major watersheds in Pennsylvania, including the Monongahela,
Youghiogheny, Kiskiminitas, Clarion, West Branch of the Susquehanna,
Swatara, Mahanoy, Catawissa, Nescopeck and upper Schuylkill.  However,
in all of these drainages there are small tributaries of clean water
harboring diverse fish populations.

2.  Total acidity, pH, and probably heavy metals, are all involved in
the toxic action of mine acid drainage on fish populations.  No
information was obtained on concentrations of metallic ions in these
discharges, but concurrent readings of pH as low as 4.5 and total
acidity as low as 15 ppm are sufficient to account for the complete
loss of fish populations at about 90 per cent of the stations
examined where no fishes were present.

3.  Several species of native fishes exhibited some tolerance for
acid mine water.  The ten most tolerant species found in water ranging
from pH 4.6 to 5.5, in order of highest tolerance, were white sucker,
brown bullhead, pumpkinseed, chain pickerel, golden shiner, creek
chubsucker, largemouth bass, brook trout, creek chub and yellow
perch.
                               83

-------
                           SECTION II

                        RECOMMENDATIONS

The reclamation of streams receiving acid mine drainage must be
sufficient to maintain concurrent readings of pH not less than 5.5
and a total mineral acidity not exceeding 5 ppm to assure a diverse
and productive fish population.  The added toxicity of heavy metals will
be largely avoided if suitable pH and acidity levels are maintained.

Even though fish populations have been eliminated in large portions
of major watersheds, there are sufficient native populations present
in small isolated tributaries to restock most waters once they are
reclaimed to a suitable quality for fishes.
                                85

-------
                          SECTION III

                          INTRODUCTION

In Appalachia, 1.5 million acres of land had been affected by surface
mining for coal prior to 1968 (Boccardy and Spaulding, 1968).  As
a direct consequence, more than 5,000 miles of stream (about 4,000
miles in Pennsylvania and West Virginia alone) were made uninhabitable
by fishes because of the acid mine drainage which resulted (Kinney,
1964).  In addition to surface mining, deep mining in Appalachia has
contributed to this form of pollution.

However, coal is the fuel used to produce most of our electricity,
and is an important mineral used by the steel industry.  The present
concern over saving the environment should emphasize the possibility
of exploiting one important natural resource (coal) without degrading
another resource (water).  Both of these resources are necessary to
maintain our present high living standards.

There is an abundance of information on the mechanisms which result
in the formation of sulphuric acid during coal mining operations
(Parsons, 1957; Braley, 1951).  There are also many studies reporting
on effects of the individual constituents of acid-mine drainage on
many different organisms (McKee and Wolf, 1963; Doudoroff and Katz,
1950 and 1953).  Many of the common metallic ions associated with
acid mine drainage, such as iron, aluminum, zinc and copper are toxic
to fishes (Affleck, 1952) and their degree of toxicity is often related
to the level of acidity in the environment (Brown and Jewell, 1926).

In comparison to the amount of information available on acid formation
in coal mining operations, there have been very few attempts to
measure the effects of acid mine drainage on natural communities of
fishes, such as the report !by Parsons (1968).  The present study serves
only to inventory the major effects of acid mine drainage on the
distribution of natural fish populations in Pennsylvania, and perhaps
suggests some variability in response of different fishes to selected
levels of acidity.  No work was done on specific compounds of acid mine
water in relation to individual fish species, but this study does
make it possible to predict the amount of reclamation of acid water
that is necessary to permit different species of fishes or mixed
populations of fishes to flourish under natural conditions.
                                87

-------
                          SECTION IV

                      METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sources of Information

Several different sources of information have been added to the
field work sponsored by the present contract in order to present as
complete a picture as possible.  Data on fish distribution and
some analyses of water quality in Pennsylvania were collected by
the writers as early as 1957.  Fishes collected during the trout
surveys conducted cooperatively in 1961 through 1965 by the U. S.
Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife and the Pennsylvania Fish
Commission have all been identified by the writers, and added a
significant amount of information to this study.  In 1966, contract
14-16-0005-2091 between BSF&W and Pennsylvania State University
provided for the collection and interpretation of additional
data.  The present contract, agreed upon in December 1968, completes
the field work on which this report is based.  In all, at 1,257
stations fish collections were attempted and a water quality analysis
made at most of these.  Stations at which at least one fish was
collected are presented in Figure 1; acid stations at which no fish
were collected are presented in Figure 2.  Stations were selected on
all major streams in Pennsylvania in which some drainage from coal
mining occurs.  Also particular care was taken to include clean
stations in each watershed as a control for both normal water
quality and normal distribution of fishes.

Fish Collections

In many of the trout stream surveys done during 1961 through 1965,
fishes were collected from representative sections of streams with
rotenone.  This method is an excellent one for estimating the numbers
of fishes present (Boccardy and Cooper, 1963), but the bad public
relations involved in killing even one game fish led us to adopt
electrofishing as our chief method of collecting subsequent to 1965.

In most instances, electrofishing was continued in a 200- to 500-foot
section of stream, sampling all available microhabitats until no new
species were found.  Such sampling reveals only a list of species present,
and there were almost always a few rare species represented by a single
individual in any collection.

In a few cases, quantitative estimates of the species composition
were made by the removal method, employing at least three consecutive
runs with electrofishing gear (Zippin, 1958).  However, only the
list of species found at these stations has been used in the present
study.


                               89

-------
       ••    •    •        . t


         • '".•: ' !' -*•'•' : '•'• '  •

      .  *   ...•'•'.•:•'.::-:.y

      ">.!.:'i •   ":^f  •






•v  «'/•'•  •  &'»fc?'>\&*'£•:•?'''*  V'.'::
  *  *  * *      •        v *•"* • "*    * ••    *.I I*     * *  *. .

 .*  f   •  •  •*  .        •\«     •."•  *'*•.!    •   .. • • •
                                                                     • •  • \ •
         •   •
 •r  •:•
•  "•/•!.«
Figure 1.  Watershed map of Pennsylvania showing stations at which one or more fish

         species was collected  (1957  through 1970).

-------
VO
                                          I  !••• • .  !•  * * •
                                         .'•Il'«l    '•
      Figure 2.  Watershed map of Pennsylvania showing stations  at which no fish were
                 taken  and in which the pH was less than  5.5  (1957 through 1970).

-------
Most of the fishes collected, including all large game species, were
returned to the stream after noting their abundance in the field
records.  A representative sample of fishes was then preserved in
10 per cent formalin and identified at a later date in the laboratory.
These samples have been added to the permanent fish collections at
Pennsylvania State University and are available to students and any
other investigators for future studies.

Water Analyses

One of the major objectives of this study was to determine the
species of fishes in waters exposed to different concentrations of
mine acids.  Among the many chemical analyses that could be made of
this variable and complex source of water, we selected five routine
analyses for two principal reasons:  1) The results from these
analyses are relatively consistent when replicated, and 2) the
combination of these analyses yields a general picture of the
severity of pollution from acid mine drainage.  The analysis of
these water samples follow standard methods except where noted below.
Toxicity from heavy metals is probably involved in acid mine drainage
pollution, but this initial inventory of effects did not attempt any
analysis of metallic ions or their complexes.

Alkalinity.—The total alkalinity was titrated in the laboratory with
0.02 N sulfuric acid to a methyl-orange end point at approximately
4.3 pH.

Acidity.—Acidity was titrated in the laboratory at room temperature
with 0.02 N sodium hydroxide to a phenophthalein end point at
approximately 8.3 pH.

Hydrogen-ion concentration.—pH was measured in the laboratory with
a Corning Model 7 electric meter, or equivalent.  Several different
pH meters were tried in an attempt to obtain stream readings in
situ, but the performance of these portable pH meters was so erratic
from one stream to another, and in a short time interval, that we
decided to bring all samples back to the laboratory for pH analysis.
A few replicate readings (field pH reading compared with sample returned
to laboratory) gave us confidence that such a procedure did not
result in erroneous readings of more than 0.2 of a pH unit in the
majority of cases.

Sulfate.—Concentrations of this ion were determined by the turbidimetric
method with a Hach Chemical Company field kit, and are not considered
to be more accurate than plus or minus 20 per cent.  Sulfates in
water do not become toxic to fishes until the concentrations approach
or even exceed the saturation level of several thousand ppm
(McKee and Wolf, 1963).  This measurement, however, is a useful
                              92

-------
adjunct to the analyses of alkalinity, acidity, and pH in that
sulfate readings higher than about 50 ppm lead one to suspect
contamination of the stream by acid mine drainage that had
subsequently been neutralized by alkaline materials.

Specific conductivity.—The electrical resistance of the water was
measured in the field or in the laboratory with a Wheatstone-type
Industrial Instruments or Beckman meter, and all readings converted
to conductivity in micromhos per c3 corrected to a temperature
of 25 C.  This independent reading of the total ions in solution
serves as a general check on the accuracy of the other analyses,
and also has obvious value in selection of efficient electrofishing
gear for particular waters.

Computer Analyses

The large amount of data on fish species and water quality, and the
desirability of analysing individual streams or watersheds against
this array of fish species and water quality parameters led us to
develop a generalized computer program to accomplish any of these
possible comparisons.  In addition, by assigning map coordinates to
each collection site, this computer program can sort the original
data cards for any desired combination of characteristics and print
any distribution map which is desired.  For example, Figure 2 is a
machine plot of all locations where the pH of the water was below
5.5 at the time of sampling and no fishes were collected.  A print
out of all tabular material associated with any group of characteristics
is also available from such a computer program.  The deck of cards and
the computer program are available for further use.
                               93

-------
                           SECTION V

                     RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Distribution of Fishes in Pennsylvania

During the period 1957 through 1970 we have confirmed the occurrence
of 116 species of fishes in Pennsylvania (Table 1).  This list is
not complete since there are several species probably present which
we have not collected and identified.  These probable additions to
the list include the northern brook lamprey, lake sturgeon, Atlantic
sturgeon, hickory shad, lake herring, blacknose shiner, blackchin
shiner, mountain madtom, brindled madtom, pirate perch, longear
sunfish, eastern sand darter, and the swamp darter.  Throughout this
report, common and scientific names of fishes follow the list of the
American Fisheries Society, Special Publication No. 6, 3d ed. 1970,
prepared by the Committee on Names of Fishes, Reeve M. Bailey,
Chairman.

The latest published compilation of Pennsylvania fishes (Fowler,
1940) lists 175 species as having occurred at one time or another
in Pennsylvania waters.  However, many fishes in Fowler's list which
we failed to collect are marine species (two sharks, a skate, men-
haden, two needlefishes, a sole, threespine stickleback, bluefish,
and the striped bass).  Other species in Fowler's list include
rare forms reported many years ago and are not now likely to be
present (shovelnose sturgeon, paddlefish, goldeye, Atlantic salmon,
bullhead minnow, river shiner, smallmouth buffalo, blue sucker,
spotted sucker, and the blue catfish).  We have added only one species
to Fowler's list and this is the parasitic Ohio lamprey which has
suddenly become rather abundant in northwestern Pennsylvania.

The major watersheds in Pennsylvania are boundary limits for a few
species of fishes.  For example, several of the darters (rainbow,
Johnny, variegate, blackside) are restricted to the Allegheny-Ohio
drainage, while the shield darter and tessellated darter are found
only on the Atlantic slope.  The tonguetied minnow is likewise
restricted to the Allegheny-Ohio drainage while its close relative,
the cutlips minnow is found abundantly in Atlantic slope streams
but not elsewhere in Pennsylvania.

Some species are rare or only locally abundant, such as the
Allegheny brook lamprey, bowfin, bridle shiner, longnose sucker,
fourspine stickleback, warmouth, channel darter and the Tippicanoe
darter.  These species are not very useful, therefore, as biotic
indicators because of their very restricted occurrence.  However,
a great many species are both abundant and widely distributed in
most watersheds.  Examples are the river chub, satinfin shiner,


                               95

-------
Table 1.  List of fish species collected in Pennsylvania waters
          during the period 1957 through 1970.
Petromyzontidae
     Ichthyomyzon bdellium, Ohio lamprey
     Ich thyomy z on greeleyi, Allegheny brook lamprey
     Ichthyomyzon unicuspis, Silver lamprey
     Lampetra aepyptera, Least brook lamprey
     Lampetra lamottei, American brook lamprey
     Petromyzon marinus, Sea lamprey

Lepisosteidae
     Lepisosteus oculatus, Spotted gar
     Lepisosteus osseus, Longnose gar

Amiidae
     Amia. calva, Bowf in

Anguillidae
     Anguilla rostrata, American eel

Clupeidae
     Alosa aestivalis, Blueback herring
     Alosa pseudoharerigus, Alewife
     Alosa sapidissima, American shad
     Dorosoma cepedianum, Gizzard shad

Salmonidae
     Salmo gairdneri, Rainbow trout
     Salmo trutta, Brown trout
     Salvelinus fontinalis, Brook trout

Osmeridae
     Osmerus mordax, Rainbow smelt

Umbridae
     Umbra limi, Central mudminnow
     Umbra phygaea, Eastern mudminnow
                                96

-------
Table 1 continued.

Esocidae
     Esox americanus, Redfin pickerel
     Esox lucius, Northern pike
     Esox masquinongy, Muskellunge
     Esox niger, Chain pickerel

Cyprinidae
     Campostoma anomalum, Stoneroller
     Carassius auratus, Goldfish
     Clinostomus elongatus, Redside dace
     Clinostomus funduloides, Rosyside dace
     Cyprinus carpio, Carp
     Ericymba buccata, Silverjaw minnow
     Exoglossum laurae, Tonguetied minnow
     Exoglossum maxillingua, Cutlips minnow
     Hydrognathus nuchalis, Silvery minnow
     Hybopsis amblops, Bigeye chub
     Hybopsis dissimilis, Streamline chub
     Hybopsis storeriana, Silver chub
     Nocomis biguttatus, Hornyhead chub
     Nocomis micropogon, River chub
     Notemigonus crysoleucas, Golden shiner
     Notropis amoenus, Comely shiner
     Notropis analostanus, Satinfin shiner
     Notropis atherinoides, Emerald shiner
     Notropis bifrenatus, Bridle shiner
     Notropis cornutus, Common shiner
     Notropis dorsalis, Bigmouth shiner
     Notropis hudsonius, Spottail shiner
     Notropis photogenis, Silver shiner
     Notropis procne, Swallowtail shiner
     Notropis rubellus, Rosyface shiner
     Notropis spilopterus, Spotfin shiner
     Notropis stramineus, Sand shiner
     Notropis volucellus, Mimic shiner
     Phoxinus erythro gas t er, Southern redbelly dace
     Pimephales notatus, Bluntnose minnow
     Pimephales promelas, lathead minnow
     Rhinichthys atratulus, Blacknose dace
     Rhinichthys cataractae, Longnose dace
     Semotilus atromaculatus, Creek chub
     Semotilus corporalis, Fallfish
     Semotilus margarita, Pearl dace

Catostomidae
     Carpiodes Cyprinus, Quillback
     Catostomus catostomus, Longnose sucker

                               97

-------
Table 1 continued.

     Catostomus commersoni, White sucker
     Erimyzon oblongus, Creek chubsucker
     Hypentelium nigricans, Northern hog sucker
     Moxostoma anisurum, Silver redhorse
     Moxostoma duquesnei, Black redhorse
     Moxostoma erythrurum, Golden redhorse
     Moxostoma macrolepidotum, Shorthead redhorse

Ictaluridae
     Ictalurus catus, White catfish
     Ictalurus melas, Black bullhead
     Ictalurus natalis, Yellow bullhead
     Ictalurus nebulosus, Brown bullhead
     Ictalurus punctatus, Channel catfish
     Noturus flavus, Stonecat
     Noturus gyrinus, Tadpole madtom
     Noturus insignis, Margined madtom
     Pilodictis olivaris, Flathead catfish

Percopsidea
     Percopsis omiscomaycus, Trout-perch

Gadidae
     Lota lota, Burbot

Cyprinodontidae
     Fundulus diaphanus, Banded killifish
     Fundulus heteroclitus, Mummichog

Atherinidae
     Labidesthes sicculus, Brook silverside

Gasterosteidae
     Apeltes quadracus, Fourspine stickleback
     Culaea inconstans, Brook stickleback

Centrarchidae
     Ambloplites rupestris, Rock bass
     Enneacanthus gloriosus, Bluespotted sunfish
     Lepomis auritus, Redbreast sunfish
     Lepomis cyanellus, Green sunfish
     Lepomis gibbosus, Pumpkinseed
     Lepomis gulosus, Warmouth
     Lepomis macrochirus, Bluegill
     Micropterus dolomieui, Smallmouth bass
                               98

-------
Table 1 continued.

     Micropterus salmoides,  Largemouth bass
     Pomoxis annularis, White crappie
     Pornoxis nigromaculatus, Black crappie

Percidae
     Etheostoma blennioides, Greenside darter
     Etheostoma caeruleum, Rainbow darter
     Etheostoma camurum, Bluebrease darter
     Etheostoma flabellare,  Fantail darter
     Etheostoma maculatum, Spotted darter
     Etheostoma nigrum, Johnny darter
     Etheostoma olmstedi, Tessellated darter
     Etheostoma tippicanoe,  Tippicanoe darter
     Etheostoma variatum, Variegate darter
     Etheostoma zonale, Banded darter
     Ferca flavescens, Yellow perch
     Percina caprodes, Logperch
     Percina copelandi, Channel darter
     Percina macrocephala, Longhead darter
     Percina maculata, Blackside darter
     Percina peltata, Shield darter
     Stizostedion v_. vitreum, Walleye

Scianenidae
     Aplodinotus grunniens, Freshwater drum

Cottidae
     Cottus bairdi, Mottled sculpin
     Cottus cognatus, Slimy sculpin
                               99

-------
common shiner, spotfin shiner, blacknose dace, creek chub, white
sucker, pumpkinseed, mottled sculpin and the slimy sculpin (Figures
3 through 12).  Within this group of species which are abundant we
were hoping to find some evidence of difference in resistance to
acid-mine drainage.  This would permit us to list species as acid-
tolerant or acid-resistant and use their absence in streams within
their normal range of distribution as an indication of stream
degradation.  A few fish species exhibit differences in acid
tolerance, but in general there seems to be a threshold level of
acid pollution (narrow range of pH) above which all species of fishes
quickly disappear.

Distribution of Acid Mine Drainage

Acid mine drainage has affected some watersheds in Pennsylvania much
more than others.  Our field collections and water quality analyses,
which identify areas of acid pollution (Figure 2) agree well with the
map of coal bearing strata published in Boccardy and Spaulding (1968).
This is related to the presence or absence of both pyritic materials
and alkaline materials in the soils of the watershed.  It is
unfortunate that carbonates are seldom associated with coal-and-pyrite-
bearing rock layers in Pennsylvania; streams draining coal-mining
areas are thus highly vulnerable to acid pollution because of their
very low alkalinity.

Although acid pollution is extensive in some watersheds, it is
important to note that healthy and diverse fish populations occur
in isolated, clean-water tributaries of even the most severely affected
watersheds  (Figure 1).  One is tempted to consider entire stream
drainages in Clearfield, Cambria, Indiana, Westmoreland, and Clarion
Counties as completely lost to acid-mine pollution.  Such is not the
case for we found diverse fish populations scattered throughout all
of these areas.  If the major sources of acid pollution could be
identified and the problems corrected, these affected watersheds
would be rapidly invaded and repopulated with a diverse assemblage
of fishes coming from existing native stream populations.

Effect of pH and Acidity on Fish Populations

In the sampling procedure applied to this study, stations were
selected from a stream drainage map to assure equal distribution by
watersheds.  Of the 1,257 stations selected, 187 harbored no fish
populations for a variety of reasons.  At 10 stations, the stream
was dry at  the time of inspection.  At five stations, domestic
sewage was  the apparent cause of no fish being present; one other
station, located immediately downstream from a sulfite paper mill,
contained no fish.  But by far the greatest number of stations (171)
that were completely devoid of fishes were associated with acid
drainage from mining operations.

                              100

-------
Figure 3.  Distribution map of the river chub (Nocomis micropogon) in Pennsylvania
           by major watersheds.

-------
o
NJ
          Figure 4   Distribution map of  the  satinfin  shiner  (Notropis  analostanus)  in

                     Pennsylvania by major watersheds.

-------
o
CO
           Figure 5.  Distribution map of the common shiner  (Notropis  cornutus)  in  Pennsylvania

                      by major watersheds.

-------
Figure 6.  Distribution map of the spotfin shiner (Notropis spilopterus) in
           Pennsylvania by major watersheds.

-------
H
O
Ui
          Figure 7.  Distribution map of the blacknose dace  (Rhinichthys atratulus)  in

                     Pennsylvania by major watersheds.

-------
                                • 7  •    '
                         »          *
Figure 8.  Distribution map of the creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) in
           Pennsylvania by major watersheds.

-------
o
-J
           .•    • / •   I	   	     	        .	,     I	

           :  x^.     •—:	'          •. V  •••'  •'^^
             C :        «..!•.:...           Y
           •\*\       • *•   .      «•••.    ».  •  . *   •(•*••           •
           \j   •      .i:   .     •  .  •    •	>...                 .
                            it •   • •    •   my   •* •    u   •         •
                    •       '     ....  Ss • •      . «"   • .        *

                    i*' :"•*.••  :-.: l.*r     ••'  '   "•'      '   • :   •
           •  •••••••       „'••./   .  •
                         .     •
                                                                       .  •••.
         Figure 9.  Distribution map of the white sucker (Catostomus  coimnersoni) in

                  Pennsylvania by major watersheds.

-------
o
00
          Figure 10. -Distribution map of the pumpkinseed  (Lepomis gibbosus) in Pennsylvania

                      by major watersheds.

-------
                    m   ••  •   ^
             •           • ••»  • *
               • •            •
              •* •   .'....
Figure 11.  Distribution map of  the mottled  sculpin (Cottus bairdi) in Pennsylvania
            by major watersheds.

-------
Figure 12.  Distribution map of the slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus) in Pennsylvania
            by major watersheds.

-------
The pH at the 155 stations for which we have pH data and in which no
fish were found ranged from 2.8 to 7.2.  The majority of these
(107) were strongly acid at a pH of 2.8 to 4.5 inclusive, and no
stations in this pH range were found to contain any fish.  Within
the pH range from 4.6 to 6.4, 48 stations contained no fish but there
were 54 stations with fish (Figure 13).  At four stations where the
pH ranged from 6.6 to 7.2 the absence of fish appeared to be
associated with high acidity, or a poorly understood complex of
chemical compounds present following neutralization of acid drainage.
An example of this latter group of toxic, but high pH values is the
station on the Quittapahilla Creek in Lebanon County.  At this station,
we could find no fish by electrofishing but the water chemistry
values were as follows:  pH 7.2, alkalinity 196 ppm, acidity 27 ppm,
sulfate 50 ppm and specific conductance 636 jumhos at 25 C.  It should
be remembered that our water quality samples were taken only once
at each station, and that toxic conditions for fishes could have
occurred sometime prior to our sampling.

Although pH and acidity are correlated to some degree, there is
evidence that a combination of both measurements may prove to be
a better predictor of toxic conditions than either measurement alone
(Figure 14).  However, this survey was not designed to include other
toxic materials such as heavy metals which undoubtedly would increase
the predictability of water quality indices on absence of fish popu-
lations.  There are examples in our data where neither acidity nor
pH, per se were in the range suspected to be toxic, but no fishes were
found (Figure 14).  As a working rule, we have found that a pH
below 4.5 and/or an acidity level above 15 ppm would be sufficient
to account for the absence of fishes at 90 per cent or more of the
stations studied.

Other workers have reported that pH values should be maintained
between 5.6 and 8.5 to maintain diverse and productive fish populations
(Spaulding and Ogden, 1968), and that pH values below 6.0 are
considered unfavorable for sport fishes.  This generalization would
appear to be consistent with the results we obtained in the
present study.

Tolerance £f_ Individual Fish Species to pH Levels

When fish taxa are arrayed in order of their occurrence in water of
decreasing hydrogen-ion concentration  (increasing pH) it appears
that some species are more tolerant than others to the water quality
conditions that accompany this change in pH (Table 2).  Only 10
species were found in waters at a pH of 5.5 or below, and none in
water where the pH was 4.5 or below.
                               Ill

-------
    IS—1
CO
z
o
o
IU
tO
111
oc.
    15—^
K
UJ
CO
     5 —



                         la's'l  "1 "I "l "U.ol  '1 '1 "1 "U
                                    HYDROOEN-ION   CONCENTRATION   (pH)
 Figure 13.   The effect of pH on  the presence or absence  of fishes in streams  of
              Pennsylvania.  Stations at which fish were present are designated by
              solid bats-

-------
E
a
a.
O

O
 1,000 —

   800 -

   600-


   400-

   300-


   200-
100—

 80 -

 60-


 40-

 30-


 20-
 10—
  8-

  6-


  4-

  3-


  2-
              •"..   •'••••:•
                ft *     •   |t  •*
                   ft      •   r   •  •
                         M|  I
                               •loo
                                             •••
•      00           0
•  •         0000

               000 000
                                         •§•
                  FISH   PRESENT
                  FISH  ABSENT
 0  0

00  0
                                                 0  0  0 •
         I  i |  I I  i i  | I  i I  i |  i

            3.0     3.5      4.0
                              i I  I I  i I  I i  i i  i I  i i  I I  I I
                              4.5     5.0      5.5     6.0
                      1 I
                      6.5
                   HYDROGEN-ION   CONCENTRATION  (pH)

    Figure 14.  The relationship between pH and acidity and their
              combined effect on the presence or absence of fishes
              in streams of Pennsylvania.
                              113

-------
Table 2.  Order of appearance of 48 fish species with decreasing
          hydrogen-ion concentration.  In parentheses are the
          number of species present up to and including the pH
          indicated.  The 68 additional species listed on Table 1
          were never found at a pH below 6.5.
     4.5 (0)

     4.6 (5)
Chain pickerel
Golden shiner
White sucker
Brown bullhead
Pumpkinseed

     4.7 (7)
Creek chubsucker
Largemouth bass

     5.0 (8)
Brook trout

     5.2 (9)
Creek chub

     5.5 (10)
Yellow perch

     5.6 (12)
Bluntnose minnow
Blacknose dace

     5.9 (18)
Brown trout
Eastern mudminnow
Longnose dace
Margined madtom
Tesselated darter
Slimy sculpin
     6.0 (34)
Ohio lamprey
Stoneroller
Silverjaw minnow
River chub
Common shiner
Silver shiner
Rosyface shiner
Mimic shiner
Hog sucker
Rock bass
Smallmouth bass
Greenside darter
Fantail darter
Johnny darter
Banded darter
Blackside darter

     6.1 (36)
Cutlips minnow
Fallfish

     6.2 (41)
Redfin pickerel
Redbreast sunfish
Rainbow darter
Variegate darter
Mottled sculpin

     6.4 (48)
American eel
Redside dace
Spotfin shiner
Spottail shiner
Pearl dace
Bluespot sunfish
Green sunfish
                              114

-------
Table 3.  Fishes occurring in waters at different pH values,  arranged
          in order of decreased tolerance to hydrogen-ion concentration.
          Based on 68 collection sites ranging from pH 4.6 to 6.4;
          each species taken in at least 9 sites.
               Frequency of occurrence
  Species      in water of pH:
               4.6 to 5.9   6.0 to 6.4
Brook trout

Pumpkinseed

White sucker

Creek chub

Brown trout

Blacknose dace

Brown bullhead

Margined madtom

Slimy sculpin

Longnose dace

Tessellated
  darter

Common shiner

Hog sucker

Cutlips minnow

Mottled sculpin
% occurrence
in water of
pH 4.6 to 5.9
Total frequency
in 68 collections
12
7
10
6
2
5
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
20
15
25
22
9
32
12
8
8
11
13
11
9
9
9
38
32
29
21
18
14
14
11
11
8
7
0
0
0
0
32
22
35
28
11
37
14
9
9
12
14
11
9
9
9
                              115

-------
Table 4.  Fishes occurring in waters at different pH values,
          arranged in  order of decreased tolerance to hydrogen-ion
          concentration.  Based on 68 collection sites ranging
          from pH 4.6 to 6.4; each species taken in 4 to 7 sites.
               Frequency of occurrence    % occurrence    Total frequency
  Species      in water of pH:            in water of     in 68 collections
               4.6 to 5.9   6.0 to 6.4    pH 4.6 to 5.9
Creek chubsucker
Chain pickerel
Yellow perch
Largemouth bass
Bluntnose
minnow
Golden shiner
Johnny darter
Stoneroller
Fallfish
River chub
Fantail darter
Blacks ide
darter
Redfin pickerel
American eel
Rosyface shiner
2
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
3
4
5
6
7
7
7
5
5
4
4
4
4
50
43
25
20
16
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
7
4
5
6
7
7
7
7
5
5
4
4
4
4
                              116

-------
Table 5.  Fishes occurring in waters at different pH values,  arranged
          in order of decreased tolerance to hydrogen-ion concentration.
          Based on 68 collection sites ranging from pH 4.6 to 6.4;
          each species taken in 1 to 3 sites.
  Species


Eastern mudminnow

Ohio lamprey

Redside dace

Spottail shiner

Spotfin shiner

Pearl dace

Bluespot sunfish

Green sunfish

Rainbow darter

Variegate darter

Silver shiner

Mimic shiner

Rock bass

Redbreast sunfish

Banded darter

Silverjaw minnow

Smallmouth bass

Greenside darter
Frequency of occurrence in
water of pH:
4.6 to 5.9     6.0 to 6.4
Total frequency
in 68 collections
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
                                117

-------
However, since some species are more common than others even under
good water quality conditions, we have divided this analysis of the
68 stations, where the pH ranged from 4.6 to 6.4, into three parts
as follows:                              '

Fishes captured in 9_ to 37 different collections.—This group of 15
species is ranged in order of decreasing tolerance to low pH, with
the number of occurrences at stations of pH 4.6 to 5.9, and the number
of occurrences at stations of pH 6.0 to 6.4.  The brook trout, pump-
kinseed, white sucker and creek chub are the most tolerant of this
group with the common shiner, hog sucker, cutlips minnow and
mottled sculpin never occurring at pH values below 6.0 (Table 3).

Fishes captured in tj_ to ]_ different collections. —This group, also
of 15 species, shows differences in tolerance to low pH although
their relative rareness within this range of pH values leads to less
confidence in predicting their response to low pH.  Among this group,
the creek chubsucker and the chain pickerel were quite tolerant to
low pH, while the Johnny darter, the stoneroller and the fallfish
never occurred at a pH below 6.0 (Table 4).

Fishes captured in ^ to _3_ different collections.—Except for the
eastern mudminnow, none of these species was taken in water where the
pH was less than 6.0 (Table 5).  However, this group was represented
so rarely in the 68 collections that we have decided not to draw
any inferences concerning their tolerance to acid conditions from
this analysis.  There remains the possibility that several of these
species (as well as some in the other two groups) are normally
found at pH values higher than 6.4 since some of them (spottail
shiner, spotfin shiner, rock bass, smallmouth bass, greenside
darter) are commonly found in streams in Pennsylvania.

General Discussion of Acid Tolerance by Fishes

Of the species which appear to be most tolerant to low pH, more
information is available on the brook trout than other species.
Powers (1929) reported natural populations of brook trout living in
headwaters streams of the southern Appalachians at pH values ranging
from 4.1 to 5.9, with several populations below 4.5 pH.  The lowest
pH at which we collected brook trout in Pennsylvania was 5.0, and at
12 stations where the pH ranged from 5.0 to 5.9.  It should be pointed
out that in these situations the total acidity in the water was less
than 10 ppm and the fish were apparently able to adjust to this
continuing source of hydrogen ions.

Packer and Dunson (1970) reported an increasing loss of sodium
from the body of brook trout as pH of the water was lowered from 7.0
                              118

-------
to 3.0 with a very rapid change occurring at pH 5.0 to 4.0.  They
explained the loss of sodium as having a secondary role in the
death of the fish.  The primary cause of death was thought to be
due to lowered blood pH interfering with the ability of the blood
to pick up and transport oxygen.

Brown and Jewell (1926) reported on the ability of several fishes
to withstand sudden changes of pH.  They captured yellow perch, brown
bullhead, northern pike, bluegill, brook stickleback, fathead minnow,
southern redbelly dace, mudminnow, Johnny darter and smallmouth
bass from a lake at pH 8.5 and transferred them to a lake at pH 4.4
where they survived up to 40 days.  The test fish suffered no more
mortality than did control fish kept at the original pH.  Such an
experiment indicates, according to Brown and Jewell, that it is not
necessary to assume that fishes found in these waters of extremely
low pH have gradually developed a resistance to low pH, or are
physiologically different from fishes living at higher pH  values.

However, fishes differ in their selection of a preferred range of
pH and detect the difference between slightly alkaline, neutral,
and slightly acid water.  The blood will maintain its normal chemical
reaction (slightly alkaline) in the face of relatively large changes
in the environment, yet we know that the physiological mechanism
breaks down when the change is too great or too long continued
(Wells, 1915).

It is impossible to separate the effects of toxic action of acidity
from that due to heavy metals, since the toxicity of copper and iron
is known to increase with increase in acidity (McKee and Wolf, 1963).
To complicate the fish toxicity picture still further, it  is known
that the toxic effects of certain metals (copper and zinc) are
additive at low concentrations  (the effect being described as similar
joint action, Herbert and Vandyke, 1964), but copper and zinc
mixtures are synergistic in response at higher concentrations
(Lloyd, 1961).
                              119

-------
                           SECTION VI

                        ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Much of the data on which this report is based comes from cooperative
studies between personnel from The Pennsylvania State University,
the Pennsylvania Fish Commission and the U. S. Bureau of Sport
Fisheries and Wildlife.  Special recognition is due to Joseph A. Boccardy
for his foresight in initiating a cooperative trout stream survey in
Pennsylvania, and the collection of fishes and water quality data
which add a great deal to our present analysis.
                              121

-------
                            SECTION VII

                            REFERENCES

 1.  Affleck, R. J.  Zinc poisoning in a trout hatchery.  Australian J.
     Marine and Freshwater Research 3(2): 142-169 (1952).

 2.  Boccardy, Joseph A. and Edwin L. Cooper.  The use of rotenone
     and electrofishing in surveying small streams.   Trans. Amer. Fish.
     Soc. 92(3): 307-310 (1963).

 3.  Boccardy, Joseph A. and Willard M. Spaulding, Jr.  Effects of
     surface mining on fish and wildlife in Appalachia.  U. S. Bureau
     of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife.  Resource Publ. 65, 20 p.  (1968).

 4.  Braley, S. A.  Acid drainage from coal mines.  Trans. (AIME)
     Amer. Inst. of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers  (Mining Branch)
     190: 703-707  (1951).

 5.  Brown, Harold W. and Minna E. Jewell.  Further studies on the
     fishes of an acid lake.  Trans. Amer. Microscopical Soc. 45:
     20-34 (1926).

 6.  Doudoroff, Peter and Max Katz.  Critical review of literature on
     the toxicity of industrial wastes and their components to fish.
     I. Alkalies, acids, and inorganic gases.  Sewage and Industrial
     Wastes 22(11): 1432-1458 (1950).

 7.  Doudoroff, Peter and Max Katz.  Critical review of literature on
     the toxicity of industrial wastes and their components to fish.
     II.  The metals as salts.  Sewage and Industrial Wastes 25(7) :
     802-839 (1953).

 8.  Fowler, Henry W.  A list of the fishes recorded from Pennsylvania.
     Pa. Board of Fish Commissioners, Biennial Report for 1940,
     p. 59-78 (1940).

 9.  Herbert, D. W. M. and Jennifer M. Vandyke.  The toxicity to fish of
     mixtures of poisons.  II. Copper-ammonia and zinc-phenol mixtures.
     Ann. Appl. Biol. 53: 415-421 (1964).

10.  Kinney, Edward C.  Extent of acid mine pollution in the United States
     affecting fish and wildlife.  U. S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and
     Wildlife, Circular 191, 27 p. (1964).
                                123

-------
11.  Lloyd, R.  The toxicity of mixtures of zinc and copper sulphates
     to rainbow trout (Salmo gairdrieri Richardson).   Ann. Appl. Biol.
     49: 535-538 (1961).

12.  McKee, J. E. and H. W. Wolf.  Water quality criteria.  California
     Water Quality Control Board, 2d ed., Publ. 3A,  548 p. (1963).

13.  Packer, Randall K.  and William A. Dunson.  Effects of low
     environmental pH on blood pH and sodium balance of brook trout.
     J. Exp. Zool. 174(1): 65-72 (1970).

14.  Parsons, John D.  Literature pertaining to formation of acid-mine
     wastes and their effects on the chemistry and fauna of streams.
     Trans. Illinois Acad. Sci. 50: 49-59 (1957).

15.  Parsons, John D.  The effects of acid strip-mine effluents on the
     ecology of a stream.  Archives Hydrobiology 65(1): 25-50 (1968).

16.  Powers, Edwin B.  Fresh water studies.  I. The relative temperature,
     oxygen content, alkali reserve, the carbon dioxide tension and
     pH of the waters of certain mountain streams at different altitudes
     in the Smoky Mountain National Park.  Ecology 10(1): 97-111  (1929).

17.  Spaulding, Willard M. Jr., and Ronald D. Ogden.  Effects of surface
     mining  on the fish and wildlife resources of the United States.
     U. S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Resource Publ.
     68, 51 p. (1968).

18.  Wells, Morris M.  Reactions and resistance of fishes in their
     natural environment to acidity, alkalinity, and neutrality.
     Biological Bulletin 29: 221-257 (1915).

19.  Zippin, C.  The removal method of population estimation.  J. Wildlife
     Management 22: 82-90 (1958).
                                124

-------
PART III:  ACUTE TOXICITY OF LOW pH
           TO AQUATIC INSECTS
                  by

 William G. Kimmel and Donald C. Hales
                  125

-------
                            ABSTRACT

The object of this study was to determine the median tolerance limits
of five aquatic insect species to low levels of pH.  Test species
were chosen on the basis of their wide occurrence and common association
in soft-water streams.  A continuous-flow bioassay system was designed
to overcome the objectionable features of static bioassays.  All species
survived exposure for 4 days to pH levels from 6.5 to 4.0.  The 96-hour
TLm values ranged from 3.31 for the most sensitive animal, Stenonema
sp., to 1.72 for the most tolerant animal, Nigronia fasciata.
Sensitivity appeared to increase during ecdysis.
                               127

-------
                           CONTENTS

Section                                                     Page

  I           Conclusions                                    135

  II          Recommendations                                137

  III         Introduction                                   139

  IV          Methods and Materials                          141
                   Apparatus
                   Bioassays
                   Test Organisms

  V           Results                                        147

  VI          Acknowledgments                                155

  VII         References                                     157
                               129

-------
                            FIGURES



                                                            PAGE
1       CONTINUOUS-FLOW BIOASSAY SYSTEM                      142




2       BIOASSAY CHAMBERS                                    144
                                131

-------
                            TABLES

No.                                                         page

1          Chemical features of Galbraith Run               141

2          Acidity, alkalinity, and sulfate concentrations
           of test water at various pH levels employed in
           bioassays                                        145

3          Insects used for acute toxicity bioassays        146

4          Number of survivors of Stenonema sp.
           following 96-hour exposures to levels of
           pH from 6.5 to 1.0 at 11 to 14 C.                148

5          Number of survivors of Acroneuria lycorias
           following 96-hour exposures to levels of
           pH from 6.5 to 1.0 at 11 to 14 C                 149

6          Number of survivors of Pteronarcys proteus
           following 96-hour exposures to levels of
           pH from 6.5 to 1.0 at 11 to 14 C                 150

7          Number of survivors of Boyeria vinosa
           following 96-hour exposures to levels of
           pH from 6.5 to 1.0 at 11 to 14 C                 151

8          Number of survivors of Nigronia fasciata
           following 96-hour exposures to levels of pH
           from 6.5 to 1.0 at 11 to 14 C                    152

9          Median tolerance limits of five aquatic insect
           species to low pH                                153
                               133

-------
                           SECTION I

                          CONCLUSIONS

The five species of insects studied were generally tolerant of
short-term exposures to the lowered pH levels induced by sulfuric
acid.  A similar conclusion was reached by Bell and Nebeker (1969)
who subjected nymphs of 10 species of stream insects to hydrochloric
acid.  Of these species, Acroneuria lycorias and Boyeria vinosa
were common to both studies.  The 96-hour TLm values for these two
species were 3.32 and 3.25, respectively, in the Bell and Nebeker
(1969) study and 3.16 and 2.25 in this study.

Aquatic insects may be more sensitive to low pH during ecdysis.
Deaths of Acroneuria lycorias at time of molt suggest the possibility
that this may be a critical time for toxicant action.  The waxy
epicuticle of terrestrial arthropods is believed to be responsible
for their relative impermeability to water.  Studies on several of
these organisms have shown that following ecdysis there is a marked
increase in transpiration rate (Edney, 1957).  In the crustacea,
ecdysis is followed by a rapid uptake of water either by an increased
permeability of the new integument or by actual drinking (Green,
1961).  An increased uptake of water at time of molt could render
the aquatic insect more vulnerable to hydrogen ions.  Some nymphs
of the genus Stenonema may pass through 30 nymphal instars before
emergence (Burks, 1953).  Nymphal instars of some species of stone-
flies may number as many as 22, and some members of the genus
Acroneuria spend 2 or 3 years in the stream before emergence
(Claassen, 1931).  An increased sensitivity to hydrogen ions during
edcysis could eliminate insects from streams at higher pH levels
than their acute toxicity values would indicate.

We doubt that low pH alone accounts for the sparse insect faunas
characteristic of streams polluted by mine effluent.  Bick, Hornuff,
and Lambremont (1953) have collected Boyeria vinosa and the genus
Stenonema from naturally acid streams having pH values between
4.0 and 5.0.  We have found each of the species tested in this study
in a naturally acid stream at pH 4.0.  Parsons (1968) found that
mine acid pollution of a stream resulted in a marked decrease in
the diversity and abundance of the benthic fauna.  We have observed
similar conditions in a soft-water stream which receives mine
effluent from a polluted tributary.  A diverse insect fauna including
Acroneuria lycorias, Stenonema sp., Pteronarcys proteus, and
Nigronia fasciata was present above the point of entrance of the
tributary.  Below the tributary, the pH had decreased from 6.8 to
5.0 and the bottom fauna was severely diminished.  Of the insects
we studied, only Nigronia fasciata which proved to be extremely
                              135

-------
tolerant of low pH in the laboratory was present.  The 96-hour TLm
values of all five species (Table 9) and their occurrence in
naturally acid streams at pH values between 4.0 and 5.0 indicate
that they could survive pH 5.0.  Thus, it appears that other
substances acting alone or synergistically with hydrogen ions are
responsible for the severe depletion of benthos in streams which
receive mine drainage.
                              136

-------
                           SECTION II

                        RECOMMENDATIONS

Measurement of pH alone for chemical surveys of water quality is
of limited value.  Chosen representatives of four orders of aquatic
insects (Ephemeroptera) Stenonema sp., (Plecoptera) Acroneuria
lycorias and Pteronarcys proteus, (Odonata) Boyeria vinosa and
(Megaloptera) Nigronia fasciata were able to exist for 96-hour TLm
values well below those found under natural conditions.

The greater sensitivity to pH during ecdysis adds a new consideration
for water quality criteria.  Most studies have been made without
regard to this sensitive period.
                               137

-------
                          SECTION III

                          INTRODUCTION

One of the principal environmental changes resulting from pollution
by coal mine  effluent is a decrease in the pH of a receiving stream.
The introduction of large quantities of sulfuric acid is particularly
damaging to streams which lack effective buffering capacities.
Other possible toxic components include metallic ions such as iron
and aluminum and the ferric hydroxide precipitate commonly seen in
those streams which receive mine acids.  The problem of mine acid
drainage is widespread, and the State of Pennsylvania, alone, has
2,500 miles of streams seriously affected by this pollution (Barnes
and Romberger, 1968).

A reduction or absence of normal benthic macroinvertebrate populations
can be used as one indication of the degree of stream pollution
(Wilhm and Dorris, 1968).  In those streams polluted by mine acids,
there is a notable lack of insect fauna.  Although the toxicity of
low pH to fish has been extensively studied (Doudoroff and Katz,
1950), the sensitivity of aquatic insects to low pH has not been
developed so extensively.  The object of this study was to investi-
gate one aspect of the mine acid problem:  the acute tolerance
limits of selected aquatic insects to the lowered pH levels induced
by sulfuric acid.  Aquatic insects represent a large segment of the
stream community and form a vital link in the food chain which
ultimately supports fish.  Knowledge of the relative toxicities of
high acidity and the other components of mine effluent to aquatic
insects is necessary if the nature of the problem posed by this
pollution to the stream community is to be understood.
                               139

-------
                          SECTION IV

                      MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental system was designed to simulate the pollution of
a soft-water stream by the sulfuric acid component of mine
effluent.

Apparatus

A continuous-flow bioassay system (Figure 1) was developed to over-
come the objectionable feature of static bioassays summarized by
Burke and Ferguson (1968).  Objectionable features of static bioassays
were a decline in toxicant concentration due to uptake by test animals
and adsorption onto the container surface, a reduction of dissolved
oxygen supply, and the accumulation of animal waste products.

The experimental apparatus was constructed of two subsystems, one
for delivery of water and the other for delivery of dilute sulfuric
acid.  All components which came into contact with water or acid
were constructed of polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, Tygon tubing,
Fiberglas, copper tubing coated internally with epoxy paint, or
Pyrex glass to eliminate contamination of the test medium due to
corrosion.

A stream having low alkalinity and low total hardness was selected
as the water source for the experiment (Table 1).  Water from

Table 1.  Chemical features of Galbraith Run.  Alkalinity, acidity,
          and hardness are expressed as parts per million of calcium
          carbonate.
       Chemistry                                         ppm

Total alkalinity                                         2.2

Total acidity                                            2-0

Total hardness                                           4.5

Sulfate                                                  3.0
Galbraith Run was transported by means of tank truck to two 500-gal
Fiberglas reservoir tanks.  This water was pumped through a particle
filter and cooling unit into a 25-gal constant-head tank which was
                              141

-------
Figure 1.  Continous-flow bioassay system,
                  142

-------
continuously aerated.  From the constant-head tank, tubing lines
ran to 10 Gilmont flowmeters (Roger Gilmont Instruments, Inc.)
which were set by means of needle valves to deliver a constant
flow of 100 ml/min to each of 10 1,000-ml filtering flasks.
A similar system consisting of reservoir, pumps, and constant-head
tank was used to deliver dilute sulfuric acid through flowmeters
for mixing with test water.  Stock solutions of dilute sulfuric acid
were prepared from concentrated sulfuric acid and distilled water
in proportions to make acid concentrations 1 pH unit lower than
the level to be tested.  Needle valves on the acid flowmeters were
adjusted to give the proper flow of stock solution to maintain a
desired pH value.

Bioassay chambers (Figure 2) were used to test multiple experimental
and control groups simultaneously.  Chambers were constructed of
polyvinyl chloride and measured 14.1 x 10.8 x 38.9 cm.  Each chamber
received acid-water mixture from its corresponding filtering flask.
Flow through the chambers ranged from about 100 to 110 ml/min
depending on the quantity of acid injected and provided approxi-
mately two complete changes of test medium per hour.  One Vibert
egg-hatching box screened with fine nylon mesh was placed in each
chamber so that the small nymphs of Sterionema sp. could be tested
concurrently with other species.  The temperature in each chamber
ranged from 11 to 14 C.  A Beckman Model 96A pH Meter (Beckman
Instruments, Inc.) standardized with known buffer solutions was
used to check the pH of each chamber every 24 hours during a test.
A Heath Recording Electrometer Model EU-301A (Heath Company) was
also used to check the accuracy of the bioassay system during the full
course of an experiment.  Test pH values were normally maintained
within +0.15 unit of the desired value.  Experiments were repeated
if the pH deviated by more than 0.25 unit.  Total alkalinity, total
acidity, and sulfate concentrations were determined for the various
pH levels tested (Table 2).  All chemical analyses except sulfates
were performed according to procedures outlined in the 12th edition
of Standard Methods for the Examination of_ Water and Wastewater
(American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association,
and Water Pollution Control Federation, 1965).  Sulfate determinations
were conducted with a Hach Model DR-EL Portable Water Engineer's
Laboratory (Hach Chemical Company).

Bioassays

Acute toxicity bioassays are used to determine the concentrations of
a given substance which are lethal to test organisms during exposure
periods from 24 to 96 hours (Doudoroff e£ al., 1951).  A 96-hour TLm,
that concentration of sulfuric acid at which 50 per cent of the test
animals are killed, was used to measure the acute toxicity for each
species.  Groups of insects were exposed to controlled pH levels and


                              143

-------
Figure 2.  Bioassay chambers,
           144

-------
Table 2.  Acidity, alkalinity, and sulfate concentrations of
          test water at various pH levels employed in bioassays.
          Acidity and alkalinity are expressed as parts per million
          of calcium carbonate; sulfate is in parts per million.
pH
7.1 (control)
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
Total acidity
2.0
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.0
7.5
15.0
46.0
133.0
159.0
1,253.0
5,350.0
10,200.0
Total alkalinity
2.2
1.7
1.6
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Sulfate
0
4
8
12
11
12
17
38
90
120
425
3,000
5,500
                              145

-------
the number of survivors noted at the conclusion of an experiment.
Ten insects of the same species were placed in each of the
experimental and control groups.  Separate experimental groups were
exposed for 96 hours to each one-half pH unit from 6.5 to 1.0.
One control group (pH 7.1) was tested concurrently with each of
three experimental groups at the same pH.  It was planned to repeat
a test if any mortality occurred in the controls.  An individual
96-hour TLm value was obtained from the percentage survival at each
of the 12 pH levels tested by a modification of the straight line
graphical interpolation method (American Public Health Association
et_ al^., 1965).  Three individual 96-hour TLm values were obtained
for each species by replicating the experimental procedure three
times.  The mean 96-hour TLm and standard error were determined
from the hydrogen ion concentrations of the individual 96-hour
TLm values and subsequently reconverted to pH units.

Test Organisms

Five species representing four insect orders were chosen as typical
representatives of the benthic community of a soft-water stream
(Table 3).  All animals were collected by means of handscreening

Table 3.  Insects used for acute toxicity bioassays.
       Organism                          Total body length (mm)


Stenonema sp.                                     5-7

Acroneuria lycorias Newman                       12-19

Pteronarcys proteus Newman                       16-30

Boyeria vinosa (Say)                             17-33

Nigronia fasciata (Walker)                       20-32
from various soft-water streams in central Pennsylvania.  Some
Nigronia fasciata were collected from a moderately hard-water stream
due to lack of sufficient numbers in the soft streams.  All animals
were transported to the laboratory in large plastic pails and
acclimated to the test water at least 96 hours prior to the start of
an experiment.  Hydropsyche sp. and Leuctra sp. were also collected
but could not be maintained under laboratory conditions.
                              146

-------
                           SECTION V

                            RESULTS

There was no mortality among all five species for pH values above
4.0 (Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8).  No mortality was observed in any
of the control groups at pH 7.1.  The various species, however,
differed markedly in their relative abilities to tolerate exposure
to lower pH levels  (Table 9).  Stenonema sp. proved to be the most
sensitive to acid conditions (Tables 4 and 9).  Acroneuria lycorias
was also relatively sensitive  (Tables 5 and 9).   Pteronarcys proteus
was a rather tolerant organism and declined from 100 to 0 per cent
survival over a span of one-half pH unit (Tables 6 and 9).  Boyeria
vinosa was very tolerant of low pH, and all individuals of this
species survived pH values as low as 2.5 (Tables 7 and 9).  Nigronia
fasciata was the most tolerant of the species studied (Tables 8 and
9).  Several of these experimental animals which survived the test
at pH 1.5 remained alive in the laboratory for an additional week
at this pH level.

Acroneuria lycorias appeared to be more sensitive to low pH during
periods of molting.  In two of the replicates, all animals survived
exposure to pH 3.5  (Table 5).  In the other replicate, nine of the
animals survived exposure to pH 3.5 with the lone mortality being
an individual which had molted during the course of the experiment.
In the second replicate, three animals were alive after 72 hours
at pH 3.0.  One of  these animals died within several hours after
the exoskeleton had split in the initial phase of the molting
process.
                              147

-------
Table 4.   Number of survivors of Sterioriema sp.  following 96-hour

exposures to levels
of pH from 6.5~to 1,
.0 at 11 to 14 C.
Number of survivors
PH
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
Test 1
10
10
10
10
10
8
6
2
0
0
0
0
Test 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
1
0
0
0
0
Test 3
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
0
0
0
0
0
                               148

-------
Table 5.  Number of survivors of Acrorieuria lycorias following

pH
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
96-hour exposures
11 to 14 C.

Test 1
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
4
0
0
0
0
to levels of pH from 6.5
Number of survivors
Test 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
0
0
0
0
to 1.0 at

Test 3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
0
0
0
0
                               149

-------
Table 6.   Number of survivors of Pteronarcys proteus following

pH
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
96-hour exposures
11 to 14 C.

Test 1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
to levels of pH from 6.5
Number of survivors
Test 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
to 1.0 at

Test 3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
                              150

-------
Table 7.  Number of survivors of Boyeria vinosa following 96-hour

exposures to levels
of pH from 6.5 to 1.
.0 at 11 to 14 C.
Number of survivors
PH
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
i
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
Test 1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
Test 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
Test 3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
                               151

-------
Table 8.   Number of survivors of Nigronia fasciata following 96-hour
exposures to levels of pH from 6.5 to 1.0 at 11 to 14 C.
PH
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0

Test 1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
2
0
Number of survivors
Test 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
0

Test 3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
0
                              152

-------
Table 9.  Median tolerance limits of five aquatic insect species
          to low pH.
Species

Stenonema sp.


Acroneuria lycorias


Pteronarcys proteus


Boyeria vinosa


Nigronia fasciata

Individual Mean 96-hour TLm
96-hour TLm and standard error
3.35
3.30 3.31 ± .02
3.28
3.10
3.20 3.16 ± .03
3.20
2.75
2.75 2.75
2.75
2.25
2.25 2.25
2.25
1.75
1.70 1.72 ± .02
1.71
                               153

-------
                           SECTION VI

                        ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Valuable criticisms of this manuscript were provided by
Drs. Edwin L. Cooper, H. Clark Dalton and W. C. Hymer.
                               155

-------
                           SECTION VII

                           REFERENCES

 1.  American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association,
     and Water Pollution Control Federation.  Standard Methods for
     the Examination of Water and Wastewater.  12th ed. Amer. Pub.
     Health Assoc. Inc., New York. 769 p. (1965).

 2.  Barnes, H. L. and S. B. Romberger.  Chemical aspects of acid
     mine drainage.  J. Water Poll. Control Fed. 40: 371-384 (1968).

 3.  Bell, H. L. and A. V. Nebeker.  Preliminary studies on the tolerance
     of aquatic insects to low pH.  J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 42: 230-236
     (1969).

 4.  Bick, G. H., L. E. Hornuff and E. N. Lambremont.  An ecological
     reconnaissance of a naturally acid stream in southern Louisiana.
     J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 28: 221-231   (1953).

 5.  Burke, W. D. and D. E. Ferguson.  A simplified flow-through
     apparatus for maintaining fixed concentrations of toxicants in
     water.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 97: 498-501 (1968).

 6.  Burks, B. D.  The mayflies or Ephemeroptera of Illinois.  Bull.
     111. Nat. Hist. Surv. 26: 1-216 (1953).

 7.  Claassen, P. W.  Plecoptera Nymphs of North America North of
     Mexico.  Charles C. Thomas Pub.,  Springfield, 111., and Baltimore
     Md. 199 p. (1931).

 8.  Doudoroff, P. (Chairman), B. G. Anderson, G. E. Burdick,
     P. S. Galtsoff, W. B. Hart, R. Patrick, E. R. Strong, E. W. Surber,
     and W. M. Van Horn.  Bio-assay methods for the evaluation of acute
     toxicity of industrial wastes to  fish.  Sew. and Ind. Wastes
     23: 1380-1397 (1951).

 9.  Doudoroff, P. and M. Katz.  Critical review on the toxicity of
     industrial wastes and their components to fish.  I. Alkalies,
     acids, and inorganic gases".  Sew. and Ind. Wastes 22: 1432-1458
     (1950).

10.  Edney, E. B.  The Water Relations of Terrestrial Arthropods.
     Cambridge Univ. Press. 109 p. (1957).

11.  Green, J.  A Biology of Crustacea.  Quadrangle Books, Inc.,
     Chicago. 180 p. (1961).
                               157

-------
12.  Parsons, J. D.  The effects of acid strip-mine drainage on the
     ecology of a stream.  Arch. Hydrobiol. 65: 25-50 (1968).

13.  Wilhm, J. L. and T. C. Dorris.  Biological parameters for
     water quality criteria.  BioScience 18: 477-481 (1968).
                               158

-------
V
2

Subject Field & Group
05C
SELECTED WATER RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
  Pennsylvania  State  University,  Department of Biology and Cooperative Fishery
  Unit, University  Park,  Pennsylvania 16802
Title
  Fish and Food  Organisms  in Acid Mine Waters of Pennsylvania.
  Butler, Robert L.
  Cooper, Edwin L.
  Hales, Donald C.
  Wagner, Charles  C.
  Kimmel, William  G.
  Crawford, J. Kent
16 I Pt°ioot Dett&atlon
     EPA Project #18050 DOG
    Note
Citation
        Environmental Protection Agency report
        number, EPA-R3-T3-032j  February 1973.
Descriptors (Starred First)

  *Water Pollution  Effects,  *Acid Mine Drainage,  *Bloassay, Water Quality
Identifiers (Starred First)

  *Fish, Behavior, Distribution,  *Invertebrates,  Acidity, Bioassay


Abstract
      Objectives were:   1)  develop a rapid and non-lethal bioassay for acid water
 using changes in utilization  of  cover and activity of fish, 2) determine the effect
 of different levels of  acid mine drainage on the presence or absence of fish
 populations in the watersheds of Pennsylvania, 3) determine the median tolerance
 limits to low levels of pH of five aquatic insects chosen on the basis of their wide
 occurrence and common association in soft-water  streams.  Analysis of variance
 revealed there was no relationship between cover utilization and pH levels or between
 activity and pH levels  for four  species  of fish  (smallmouth bass, longnose dace, rock
 bass and brook trout.
      In part II of the  project it was found that common fish species normally distri-
 buted over several watersheds were absent where  there was severe acid mine drainage.
 Of the 116 species of fishes  found 10 species exhibited some tolerance to acid mine
 drainage (values of pH  5.5 or less).
      In part III all aquatic  species  survived exposure for four days to pH levels
 from 6.5 to 4.0.  The 96-hour TLm values ranged  from 3.31 for the most sensitive
 animal, Stenonema sp.,  to  1.72 for the most tolerant insect, Nigronia fasciata.
actor
JO?
J:c
Robert
(REV. JULY
L.
Butler
Institution
1969) SEND.
WITH
The
COPY OF
Pennsvlvani
DOCUMENT. TO:
a State
TTn -i -neiyc-t 1-n 	 _-.
WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WASHINGTON. O. C. 2O240
                                                                          GPOt t»7O - 407 -«91

-------