&EPA
United States      Industrial Environmental Research  EPA-600/9-82-005a
Environmental Protection  Laboratory          July 1982
Agency        Research Triangle Park NC 2771 1
Research and Development
Third Symposium on the
Transfer and
Utilization of Particulate
Control Technology:

Volume  I. Control of
Emissions from Coal
Fired Boilers

-------
                                           EPA-600/9-82-005a
                                           April 1982

                  THIRD SYMPOSIUM ON THE
               TRANSFER AND UTILIZATION OF
             PARTICULATE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
VOLUME I.   CONTROL OF EMISSIONS  FROM COAL  FIRED BOILERS
                       Compiled by:
         F.P. Venditti, J.A.  Armstrong, and M. Durham

                   Denver Research Institute
                       P.O. Box 10127
                   Denver,  Colorado  80208
                    Grant Number:  R805725
                       Project Officer

                       Dale L. Harmon
       Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology
          Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
               Research Triangle Park,  NC  27711
                        Prepared for:

     INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
           OFFICE OF  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
          U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC  27711

-------
                               DISCLAIMER

     This  report  has  been  reviewed  by  the  Industrial  Environmental
Research  Laboratory-Research  Triangle  Park,  North  Carolina,  Office  of
Research  and  Development,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, and
approved  for  publication.   Approval  does not  signify that  the  contents
necessarily  reflect  the  views   and  policies  of  the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does  mention  of trade names or commercial  products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                    11

-------
                                ABSTRACT

     The papers  in these four volumes of Proceedings were presented  at the
Third  Symposium  on the  Transfer  and  Utilization  of  Particulate Control
Technology  held  in Orlando,  Florida during 9 March through 13 March 1981,
sponsored by the Particulate Technology Branch of the  Industrial Environ-
mental Research Laboratory  of the  Environmental  Protection  Agency  and
coordinated  by the Denver Research Institute of the University of Denver.

     The  purpose  of the  symposium was  to bring  together  researchers,
manufacturers,  users,  government  agencies,  educators and  students  to
discuss new technology  and  to provide  an effective means for  the  transfer
of this technology  out of the laboratories and into the hands of the users.

     The  three  major   categories  of  control   technologies —electrostatic
precipitators, scrubbers,  and fabric  filters — were the major  concern  of the
symposium.   These  technologies were discussed  from  the perspectives of
economics;  new  technical  advancements in  science  and engineering;  and
applications.   Several  papers  dealt  with  combinations  of  devices  and
technologies,  leading  to  a concept  of using  a  systems approach  to partic-
ulate  control rather  than  device  control.  Additional topic  areas  included
novel  control devices,  high temperature/high pressure applications. fugitive
emissions, and measurement techniques.

     These  proceedings  are divided into four volumes, each volume contain-
ing  a set  of  related  session  topics  to provide  easy  access  to  a unified
technology area.
                                   iii

-------
                             VOLUME I
                                                              Page

VOLUME II.  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS--CONTENTS ...    ix
VOLUME III.  PARTICULATE CONTROL DEVICES--CONTENTS .   .   .   xiii
VOLUME IV.  ATYPICAL APPLICATIONS—CONTENTS	xviii
                      Section A - Fabric Filters

COAL PROPERTIES AND FLY ASH FILTERABILITY	1
  R. Dennis, J.A.  Dirgo and L.S. Hovis

PULSE-JET FILTRATION WITH ELECTRICALLY
CHARGED FLYASH  	  11
  R.P. Donovan, L.S. Hovis, G.H. Ramsey and J.H. Abbott

ELECTRICALLY CHARGED FLYASH EXPERIMENTS  IN A
LABORATORY SHAKER BAGHOUSE	23
  L.S. Hovis, J.H. Abbott,  R.P. Donovan and C.A. Pareja

ELECTROSTATIC AUGMENTATION OF FABRIC FILTRATION  ....  35
  D.W. VanOsdell,  G.P. Greiner, G.E.R. Lamb and L.S. Hovis

FABRIC WEAR STUDIES AT  HARRINGTON STATION	45
  R. Chambers, K. Ladd, S. Kunka and D. Harmon

SPS  PILOT BAGHOUSE OPERATION	55
  K. Ladd, W. Hooks, S. Kunka and D.  Harmon

REVIEW OF SPS INVESTIGATION OF HARRINGTON STATION
UNIT 2 FABRIC FILTER SYSTEM	65
  K. Ladd, S. Kunka

A SUMMARY  OF PERFORMANCE TESTING OF  THE  APITRON
ELECTROSTATICALLY AUGMENTED FABRIC FILTER	75
  D. Helfritch and L. Kirsten

FABRIC FILTER OPERATING EXPERIENCE FROM SEVERAL
MAJOR UTILITY UNITS	82
  O.F. Fortune,  R.L. Miller and E.A.  Samuel

EVALUATION OF THE 25 MW KRAMER  STATION BAGHOUSE:
TRACE ELEMENT EMISSION  CONTROL	94
  M.W. McElroy and R.C. Carr

CHARACTERIZATION OF A 10 MW FABRIC FILTER
PILOT PLANT	96
  W.B. Smith, K.M.  Gushing and R.C.  Carr

-------
VOLUME I CONTENTS (cont.)


SPECIFYING A FABRIC FILTER SYSTEM	107
  R.L.  Ostop and D.A. Single

EVALUATION OF THE 25 MW KRAMER STATION BAGHOUSE:
OPERATIONAL FACTORS IN PARTICULATE MATTER
EMISSION CONTROL	118
  R.C.  Carr and M.W. McElroy

PULSE-JET TYPE FABRIC FILTER EXPERIENCE AT AIR TO
CLOTH RATIOS OF 5 TO 1 ON A BOILER FIRING PULVERIZED
COAL	120
  G.L.  Pearson

SELECTION AND OPERATION OF BAGHOUSES AT R.D. NIXON
STATION, UNIT #1	129
  R.C. Hyde,  J. Arello and D.J. Huber

POTENTIAL  FOR IMPROVEMENT IN BAGHOUSE DESIGN	138
  R.M. Jensen

REVIEW OF OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE  EXPERIENCES WITH
HIGH TEMPERATURE FILTER MEDIA ON COAL-FIRED BOILERS  .  .   .148
  L.K. Crippen

                 Section B - Electrostatic Precipitators

PILOT  DEMONSTRATION OF THE PRECHARGER-COLLECTOR
SYSTEM	157
  P. Vann Bush, Duane H. Pontius

REMEDIAL TREATMENTS FOR  DETERIORATED HOT SIDE
PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE	165
  R.E. Bickelhaupt

EVALUATION OF THE UNITED McGILL ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR	176
  D.S. Ensor, P.A. Lawless, A.S.  Damle

PREDICTING THE  EFFECT OF PROPRIETARY CONDITIONING
AGENTS ON FLY ASH RESISTIVITY	185
  R.J.  Jaworowski  and J.J. Lavin

SO,  CONDITIONING TO ENABLE ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATORS TO MEET DESIGN EFFICIENCIES	197
  J.J.  Ferrigan, III
                               vi

-------
VOLUME I CONTENTS (cont.)


ENHANCED PRECIPITATOR COLLECTION EFFICIENCIES
THROUGH RESISTIVITY MODIFICATION	206
  D.F.  Mahoney

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW SULFUR TYPE ASH CONDITIONING .  .   .   .216
  R.H.  Gaunt

OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH FLUE GAS CONDITIONING
SYSTEMS AT COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY	226
  L.L.  Weyers and R.E. Cook

THE APPLICATION OF A TUBULAR WET ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR FOR FINE PARTICULATE CONTROL AND
DEMISTING IN AN INTEGRATED FLY ASH AND SO2 REMOVAL
SYSTEM ON COAL-FIRED BOILERS	236
  E. Bakke and H.P.  Willett

FIELD EVALUATIONS OF AMMONIUM  SULFATE CONDITIONING
FOR IMPROVEMENT OF COLD SIDE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
PERFORMANCE	237
  E.G.  Landham, Jr., G.H. Marchant, Jr., J.P. Gooch and
  R.F.  Altman

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT OBTAINED
WITH PULSE ENERGIZATION SYSTEMS ON A HOT-SIDE
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR	253
  W. Piulle, L.E.  Sparks, G.H. Marchant, Jr. and J.P. Gooch

A NEW  MICROCOMPUTER AND STRATEGY FOR THE CONTROL
OF  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS	265
  K.J.  McLean, T.S.  Ng, Z. Herceg  and Z.  Rana

ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL FOR THE HIGH
INTENSITY IONIZER IN THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY  .  .   .   .272
  J.S.  Lagarias, J.R. McDonald and D.V. Giovanni

APPLICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVING PULSE  ENERGIZATION
FOR PRECIPITATORS--PRACTICAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS .  .   .   .291
  H. H. Petersen and P. Lausen

                   Section C - Dry SO9 Scrubbers

S02 REMOVAL BY DRY INJECTION AND SPRAY ABSORPTION
TECHNIQUES	303
  E.L.  Parsons,  Jr.,  V. Boscak,  T.G.  Brna and R.L. Ostop

DRY SCRUBBING SO2 AND  PARTICULATE CONTROL	313
  N.J.  Stevens,  G.B. Manavizadeh, G.W. Taylor and M.J. Widico

                               vii

-------
VOLUME I CONTENTS (cont.)                                    pg(
                                                             -i -»

FIBER AND FABRIC ASPECTS  FOR SO2 DRY SCRUBBING
BAGHOUSE SYSTEMS  	
  L.  Bergmann
TWO-STAGE DRY FLUE GAS CLEANING USING CALCIUM
ALKALIS	333
  D.C. Gehri,  D.F. Dustin and S.J. Stachura

CONTROL OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, CHLORINE, AND TRACE
ELEMENT  EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED BOILERS BY FABRIC
FILTRATION	341
  R.J.  Demski, J.T. Yeh and J.I. Joubert

                      Section D - Scrubbers

FLYASH COLLECTION USING A VENTURI SCRUBBER—MINNESOTA
POWER'S COMMERCIAL OPERATING EXPERIENCE	352
  C.A. Johnson

AUTHOR INDEX	361
                              viii

-------
                           VOLUME II


                 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS

                     Section A - Fundamentals

                                                           Page

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF IONIC
CONDUCTION IN FLY  ASH LAYERS	1
  R.B. Mosley, J.R. McDonald and L.E. Sparks

MEASUREMENTS OF ELECTRICAL  PROPERTIES
OF FLY ASH LAYERS	13
  R.B. Mosley, P.R. Cavanaugh,  J.R.  McDonald and L.E. Sparks

LASER DOPPLER ANEMOMETER MEASUREMENTS OF PARTICLE
VELOCITY IN A LABORATORY PRECIPITATOR	25
  P.A. Lawless, A.S.  Damle, A.S. Viner, E.J.  Shaughnessy and
  L.E. Sparks

PROGRESS IN MODELING BACK CORONA	35
  P.A. Lawless

A COMPUTER MODEL FOR ESP PERFORMANCE	44
  P.A. Lawless, J.W.  Dunn  and L.E. Sparks

MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF CURRENT
DENSITY  DISTRIBUTION AND CHARGE/MASS DATA	54
  M.  Durham, G. Rinard, D. Rugg and L.E. Sparks

THE  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GAS STREAM TURBULENCE
AND  COLLECTION EFFICIENCY  IN A LAB-SCALED
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR	66
  B.E. Pyle,  J.R. McDonald, W.B. Smith

PARTICLE DEPOSITION  PROFILES AND  REENTRAINMENT
IN A WIRE-PLATE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR	76
  E.  Arce-Medina and  R.M.  Felder

PARTICLE TRANSPORT  IN THE EHD FIELD	87
  T.  Yamamoto

SURFACE  REENTRAINMENT  OF COLLECTED FLY ASH IN
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS	97
  M.  Mitchner, M.J. Fisher, D.S. Gere, R.N. Leach and S.A. Self

ELECTROMECHANICS OF PRECIPITATED ASH LAYERS	109
  G.B. Moslehi and S.A. Self


                               ix

-------
VOLUME II CONTENTS (cont.)


EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE EFFECT OF
TURBULENT DIFFUSION ON PRECIPITATOR EFFICIENCY	
  G.L.  Leonard, M. Mitchner and  S.A. Self

CAN REENTRAINMENT BE EXPLAINED USING A  NEW
PRECIPITATOR FORMULA?	1JU
  S. Maartmann

A LABORATORY FURNACE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF
SYNTHETIC FLY ASH FROM SMALL COAL SAMPLES	141
  K.M.  Sullivan

COMPUTER SIMULATION OF THE WIDE PLATE
SPACING EFFECT	149
  E. A.  Samuel

SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS OF AERODYNAMIC SIZE
AND ELECTRIC CHARGE OF AEROSOL PARTICLES IN REAL
TIME ON A SINGLE PARTICLE BASIS	160
  M.K.  Mazumder, R.G. Renninger, T.H. Chang,
  R.W.  Raible,  W.G. Hood, R.E. Ware and R.A. Sims

APPLICATION OF LASER DOPPLER INSTRUMENTATION  TO
PARTICLE TRANSPORT MEASUREMENTS IN AN ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR	169
  M.K.  Mazumder, W.T. Clark III, R.E. Ware, P.C. McLeod,
  W.G.  Hood,  J.E.  Straub and  S.  Wanchoo

THE APPLICATION  OF MEASUREMENTS OF AEROSOL
CHARGE ACQUISITION BY BIPOLAR IONS TO THE PROBLEM
OF  BACK CORONA	179
  R.A.  Fjeld,  R.O. Gauntt, G.J.  Laughlin and A.R. McFarland

IDENTIFICATION OF BACK DISCHARGE SEVERITY	189
  S. Masuda and Y. Nonogaki

               Section B -  Operations and Maintenance

MODELING OF ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS WITH  RESPECT
TO RAPPING REENTRAINMENT AND  OUTLET OPACITY	199
  M.G.  Faulkner, W.E. Farthing,  J.R.  McDonald and L.E. Sparks

NEW PRECIPITATOR TECHNOLOGY FOR PARTICULATE
CONTROL	208
  J.R.  Zarfoss
                               X

-------
VOLUME II CONTENTS (cont.)
                                                           Page

AN APPLICATION SUMMARY OF HIGH ENERGY SONIC
CLEANING APPLIED TO ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS	218
  M.J. Berlant

THE IMPACT OF INTELLIGENT PRECIPITATOR CONTROLS	230
  N.Z.  Shilling, R.O. Reese and J.A. Fackler

AN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS	242
  R.R.  Crynack and M.P. Downey

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
PERFORMANCE AND  RECORDKEEPING PRACTICES	252
  S.P.  Schliesser

AN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR
A PHOSPHATE ROCK ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR	262
  D.B.  Rimberg

                    Section C - Advanced Design

ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE
WITH PULSE EXCITATION	273
  D. Rugg, M. Durham, G.  Rinard and L.E.  Sparks

DEVELOPMENT OF A CHARGING DEVICE FOR HIGH-RESISTIVITY
DUST USING HEATED AND COOLED ELECTRODES	283
  G. Rinard, M. Durham, D. Rugg and L.E.  Sparks

THE EVALUATION OF NOVEL ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
SYSTEMS  USING A TRANSPORTABLE PROTOTYPE	295
  G. Rinard, M. Durham, D. Rugg, J. Armstrong,
  L.E.  Sparks  and J.H. Abbott

ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTRICAL AND CHARGING
CHARACTERISTICS OF A THREE ELECTRODE PRECHARGER  .  .  .   .304
  K.J.  McLean

PARTICLE CHARGING IN  AN ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR BY  PULSE AND DC VOLTAGES	314
  L.E.  Sparks,  G.H. Ramsey, R.E. Valentine and J.H. Abbott

PARTICLE COLLECTION IN A TWO STAGE ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR WITH VARIOUS COLLECTOR  STAGES	326
  L.E.  Sparks,  G.H. Ramsey, R.E. Valentine and J.H. Abbott

HIGH INTENSITY IONIZER DEVELOPMENT	334
  M.H.  Anderson, J.R. McDonald, J.P. Gooch and D.V. Giovanni

                               xi

-------
VOLUME II CONTENTS  (cont.)


DEMONSTRATION OF AIR POLLUTION SYSTEMS HIGH
INTENSITY IONIZER/ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR  ON
AN OIL-FIRED BOILER
  G.A.  Raemhild, A. Prem and F. Weisz
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY IONIZATION IN AN
ELECTRON BEAM PRECIPITATOR SYSTEM
  W.C.  Finney, L.C. Thanh, J.S. Clements and R.H. Davis
INFLUENCE ON PARTICLE CHARGING OF ELECTRICAL
PARAMETERS AT DC AND PULSE VOLTAGES  ......... 370
  H.J. Joergensen,  J.T. Kristiansen and P. Lausen

BOXER-CHARGER MARK III  AND ITS
APPLICATION IN ESP'S   ................ 380
  S. Masuda,  H. Nakatani and A. Mizuno

THE PERFORMANCE OF AN EXPERIMENTAL
PRECIPITATOR WITH AN ALL-PLATE ZONE .......... 390
  J. Dalmon

THE PHYSICS OF PULSE ENERGIZATION OF
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS ............. 404
  L. Menegozzi and  P.L. Feldman

ADVANCED ELECTRODE DESIGN FOR
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS ............. 405
  S. Bernstein,  K. Ushimaru and E.W.  Geller

                 Section D - Industrial Applications

PROBLEMS IN APPLYING AN  ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR TO A SALVAGE FUEL-FIRED BOILER ....... 415
  C.R. Thompson

THE APPLICATION OF ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS
TO BOILERS FIRING MULTIPLE FUELS   ........... 425
  R.L. Bump

AUTHOR INDEX ................... 435
                              xii

-------
                          VOLUME III


                 PARTICULATE CONTROL DEVICES

                      Section A -  Scrubbers

                                                          Page

THE CALVERT SCRUBBER   	  1
  S. Calvert, R.G. Patterson and S. Yung

FLUX FORCE/CONDENSATION SCRUBBER SYSTEM
FOR COLLECTION OF FINE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
FROM AN IRON MELTING CUPOLA	10
  S. Calvert and D.L.  Harmon

DEMONSTRATION OF HIGH-INTENSlTY-IONIZER-ENHANCED
VENTURI SCRUBBER ON A MAGNESIUM RECOVERY
FURNACE FUME EMISSIONS	21
  A. Prem,  M.T. Kearns and D.L. Harmon

A NEW ENTRY IN THE HIGH EFFICIENCY SCRUBBER FIELD  .... 33
  L.C. Hardison and F. Ekman

PERFORMANCE OF PARTICULATE SCRUBBERS AS
INFLUENCED BY GAS-LIQUID CONTACTOR DESIGN
AND BY DUST FLOCCULATION	43
  K.T. Semrau and R.J. Lunn

INVESTIGATION OF  VENTURI SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
AND PRESSURE DROP	51
  R. Parker, T. Le and S. Calvert

SCRUBBER  TECHNOLOGY AND THE  INTERACTION OF
A UNIQUE STRUCTURE AS MIST ELIMINATOR	60
  G.C. Pedersen

NOVEL ANNULAR VENTURI SCRUBBER DESIGN REDUCES
WASTE DISCHARGE PROBLEMS	71
  H.P. Beutner

CONSIDERATION OF THE  PERTINENT DESIGN AND
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS ESSENTIAL FOR
OPTIMIZATION OF VENTURI SCRUBBER PERFORMANCE	80
  H.S. Oglesby

APPLICATION OF SCRUBBERS FOR PARTICULATE
CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL BOILERS	90
  M. Borenstein


                             xiii

-------
VOLUME III CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                           Page

APPLICATION OF HIGH ENERGY VENTURI SCRUBBERS
TO SEWAGE INCINERATION  ...............
  F.X. Reardon
AN INCINERATOR SCRUBBER THAT WORKS:
A CASE STUDY  ...................  m
  C. Menoher

EVALUATION OF ENTRAINED LIQUOR CONTRIBUTION TO
TOTAL MASS EMISSIONS DOWNSTREAM OF A WET SCRUBBER   .   .  .119
  W. David Balfour, L.O.  Edwards and H.J. Williamson

                     Section B -  Fabric Filters

A DUAL-BEAM BACKSCATTER BETA-PARTICLE GAUGE
FOR MEASURING THE DUST CAKE THICKNESS ON OPERATING
BAG FILTERS INDEPENDENT OF POSITION ..........  128
  R.P. Gardner, R.P. Donovan and L.S. Hovis

DIAGNOSING FILTER FABRIC CAPABILITIES WITH LIGHT
SCATTERING AND NUCLEI DETECTING INSTRUMENTATION  .  .   .  .140
  R. Dennis, D.V. Bubenick and  L.S. Hovis

ACID DEWPOINT CORROSION IN PARTICULATE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT  .................  150
  T.E. Mappes, R.D. Terns and K.E.  Foster

SECOND GENERATION OF EMISSIONS CONTROL
SYSTEM FOR COKE  OVENS  ...............  160
  J.D. Patton

EFFECTS OF FLYASH SIZE DISTRIBUTION ON  THE
PERFORMANCE OF A FIBERGLASS FILTER ..........  171
  W.F. Frazier and W.T. Davis

FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF A FABRIC FILTER
WITH A CORONA PRECHARGER ..............  181
  K. linoya and Y. Mori

ECONOMIC EVALUATION FACTORS IN BID
EVALUATIONS— A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ..........  193
  J.G. Musgrove and J.E. Shellabarger

FLY ASH RE-ENTRAINMENT IN A BAGHOUSE—
WHAT  DOES  IT COST? .................  201
  J.G. Musgrove


                             xiv

-------
VOLUME III CONTENTS (cont.)
                                                           Page

WHY PERFORM MODEL STUDY  OF FABRIC FILTER
COLLECTOR?	211
  W.T.  Langan, N.Z. Shilling, W.A.  Van Kleunen and O.F. Fortune

EXPERIENCES OF A SMALL INSULATION MANUFACTURER
IN MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL REGULATIONS	221
  R.L.  Hawks

ADVANCED FABRIC FILTER TECHNOLOGY  FOR
DIFFICULT PARTICULATE EMISSIONS	228
  H.P.  Beutner

DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINES FOR  OPTIMUM BAGHOUSE
FLUID DYNAMIC SYSTEM DESIGN	238
  D.  Eskinazi, G.B. Gilbert and R.C. Carr

THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF PRESSURE DROP REDUCTION
IN A FABRIC FILTER WITH CHARGED PARTICLES	250
  T.  Chiang, E.A. Samuel and K.E.  Wolpert

EXPERIMENTAL CORRELATION OF DUST CAKE POROSITY,
AIR-TO-CLOTH RATIO  AND PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS .  .   .  .261
  T.  Chiang and R.L. Ostop

MODEL FOR DUST PENETRATION THROUGH A
PULSE-JET FABRIC FILTER	270
  D.  Leith and M.J. Ellenbecker

PERFORMANCES OF DUST LOADED AIR FILTERS	280
  C.  Kanaoka, H.  Emi and M.  Ohta

ELECTROSTATICALLY ENHANCED FABRIC
FILTRATION OF PARTICULATES	290
  T.  Ariman and S.T. McComas

A STAGGERED ARRAY  MODEL OF A  FIBROUS FILTER
WITH ELECTRICAL ENHANCEMENT	301
  F.  Henry and T. Ariman

                     Section C -  Granular Beds

AEROSOL FILTRATION  BY A COCURRENT  MOVING
GRANULAR BED:  PENETRATION THEORY	311
  T.W. Kalinowski and  D. Leith

FUNDAMENTAL EXPERIMENTS  ON A  GRANULAR BED FILTER .  .  .  .321
  K.  linoya and Y. Mori

                               XV

-------
VOLUME III CONTENTS (cont.)


DRY DUST COLLECTION OF BLAST FURNACE
EXHAUST  GAS BY MOVING GRANULAR BED FILTER
  A. Wakabayashi, T.  Sugawara and S. Watanabe

                     Section D - Novel Devices

IRON AND STEEL AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
USING MAGNETIC SEPARATION	341
  D.C. Drehmel, C.E. Ball and C.H.  Gooding

TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF TWO
NOVEL PARTICULATE CONTROL DEVICES	353
  R.R. Boericke, J.T. Kuo and  K.R. Murphy
                     TM
THE ELECTROSCRUBBER111 FILTER—APPLICATIONS
AND PARTICULATE COLLECTION PERFORMANCE	363
  D. Parquet

HIGH EFFICIENCY PARTICULATE REMOVAL WITH
SINTERED METAL FILTERS	373
  B.E. Kirstein, W.J.  Paplawsky, D.T. Pence and T.G. Hedahl

APPLICATION OF ELECTROSTATIC TECHNIQUES TO
THE REMOVAL OF DUST AND FUME FROM THE
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT	382
  S.A. Hoenig

THE DRY  VENTURI	393
  AJ. Teller and D.RJ.  Roy

FIBER BED FILTER SYSTEM CONTROL OF
WELDING PARTICULATES	398
  J.A. Bamberger and W.K. Winegardner

THE USE OF GLASS CAPILLARY FILTERS TO
CLASSIFY ACTINOLITE FIBERS	406
  J.W. Gentry, T.C. Chen,  S.W. Lin and P.Y. Yu

ULTRA-HIGH EFFICIENCY FILTRATION SYSTEMS
(AIR RECIRCULATION)	417
  R.W. Potokar

THE WET WALL ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR	428
  J. Starke,  J. Kautz  and K-R.  Hegemann
                             xvi

-------
VOLUME III CONTENTS (cont.)


                  Section E - Mechanical Collectors

TROUBLESHOOTING MULTIPLE CYCLONES ON
FUEL-OIL-FIRED BOILERS	438
  F.  Crowson and R.L. Gibbs

COLLECTION  EFFICIENCIES OF CYCLONE SEPARATORS	449
  P.W.  Dietz

ELECTROSTATICALLY AUGMENTED COLLECTION
IN VORTICAL FLOWS	459
  P.W.  Dietz

HIGH PERFORMANCE CYCLONE DEVELOPMENT	468
  W.G.  Giles

AUTHOR INDEX	481
                              xvii

-------
                          VOLUME IV


                    ATYPICAL APPLICATIONS

              Section A - Advanced Energy Applications

                                                           Page

HIGH TEMPERATURE PARTICLE COLLECTION WITH
A.P.T.  EPxP DRY SCRUBBER  ..........   •  •   •  •  L
  S. Yung, T.  Lee, R.C. Patterson,  S. Calvert and D.C. Drenmel
PARTICLE COLLECTION IN CYCLONES AT HIGH TEMPERATURE
AND HIGH PRESSURE
  R. Parker, R. Jain,  S. Calvert,  D.C. Drehmel and J. Abbott
OPERATING RESULTS OF ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS
AT HIGH TEMPERATURE AND HIGH PRESSURES  ........   3
  P.L. Feldman and K.S. Kumar

CONTROL OF  PARTICULATES IN PROCESS AREA 12, SOLVENT
REFINED COAL PROCESS ................  15
  W.H. Wilks,  P.D-  Wilkinson and J.A. Schlosberg

NON- PLUGGING RETAINING  STRUCTURE FOR GRANULAR
BED FILTER FOR HTHP APPLICATION   ...........  26
  A.M. Presser and J.C. Alexander

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CONTROL FROM A COAL-FIRED
OPEN-CYCLE MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS/STEAM POWER PLANT ...  36
  H.H. Wang and T.E. Dowdy

REAL TIME COARSE PARTICLE MASS MEASUREMENTS IN
A HIGH TEMPERATURE  AND PRESSURE COAL GASIFIER
PROCESS TREATMENT .................  46
  J. Wegrzyn, J.  Saunders and W. Marlow

THE DESIGN,  ENGINEERING, AND STARTUP OF A VENTURI
SCRUBBER SYSTEM ON AN OIL  SHALE OFF-GAS INCINERATOR ...  55
  P. A. Czuchra and J.S. Sterrett

FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTION HOT FLUE GAS CLEANUP
PERSPECTIVE ON CYCLONES AND OTHER DEVICES  .......  63
  R.F. Henry  and W.F.  Podolski

PRESSURIZED AND NON-PRESSURIZED ACOUSTIC
AGGLOMERATORS FOR HOT-GAS CLEANUP APPLICATIONS .....  73
  K.H. Chou and D.T.  Shaw
                             xviii

-------
VOLUME IV CONTENTS (cont.)


ALKALIS AND THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO CORONA CURRENT
AT HIGH TEMPERATURE AND HIGH PRESSURE	74
  R.W.L. Snaddon

HOT GAS CLEANUP IN PRESSURIZED FLUIDIZED
BED COMBUSTION	83
  L.N. Rubow and M.G. Klett

VENTURI SCRUBBING FOR CONTROL OF PARTICULATE
EMISSIONS FROM OIL  SHALE RETORTING	95
  G.M. Rinaldi and R.C. Thurnau

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S  PRESSURIZED
FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTOR CLEANUP TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM .  .   .105
  W.E. Moore

THE CYCLOCENTRIFUGE™—AN ADVANCED GAS/SOLIDS
SEPARATOR FOR COAL CONVERSION  PROCESSES	116
  P.R. Albrecht, J.T.  McCabe  and W. Fedarko

                    Section B - Fugitive Emissions

DEMONSTRATION OF THE USE OF CHARGED FOG IN
CONTROLLING FUGITIVE DUST FROM LARGE-SCALE
INDUSTRIAL SOURCES	125
  E.T. Brookman, R.C. McCrillis and D.C. Drehmel

THE CONTROL OF FUGITIVE EMISSIONS USING WINDSCREENS  .  .   .135
  D.  Games and D.C.  Drehmel

THE INFLUENCE OF AGGREGATE PILE  SHAPE AND
ORIENTATION ON PARTICULATE FUGITIVE EMISSIONS	145
  D.  Martin

SPRAY CHARGING "AND TRAPPING SCRUBBER FOR
FUGITIVE PARTICLE EMISSION CONTROL	155
  S.  Yung, S. Calvert and D.C.  Drehmel

IMPROVED STREET SWEEPER FOR CONTROLLING URBAN
INHALABLE PARTICULATE MATTER	156
  S.  Calvert, H. Brattin, S. Bhutra,  R. Parker and D.C. Drehmel

A WIND TUNNEL FOR  DUST ENTRAINMENT STUDIES	168
  A.S. Viner, M.B. Ranade, E.J. Shaughnessy, D.C. Drehmel
  and B.E. Daniels
                              xix

-------
VOLUME IV CONTENTS (cont.)                                   Page


TECHNIQUES AND EQUIPMENT FOR MEASURING INHALABLE
PARTICULATE  FUGITIVE EMISSIONS  ............
  H.J. Kolnsberg
BALLOON SAMPLING TO CHARACTERIZE PARTICLE
 MISSIONS FROM FUGITIVE SOURCE;
  J.A. Armstrong and D.C. Drehmel
EMISSIONS FROM FUGITIVE SOURCES	188
AN ELECTROSTATICALLY CHARGED FOG GENERATOR FOR
THE CONTROL OF INHALABLE PARTICLES  ..........
  C.V.  Mathai, L.A. Rathbun and D.C.  Drehmel

RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHEMICAL ADDITIVES
AND WIND SCREENS FOR FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL .......  210
  D.C.  Drehmel and B.E. Daniel

PARTICULATE IMPACT COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTROLLED
STACK  EMISSIONS FOR A 2000 MW ELECTRICAL GENERATING
STATION  .....................  222
  H.E.  Hesketh and F.L.  Cross

OPERATING  EXPERIENCE AND THE TECHNIQUES IN THE
CONTROL OF COAL DUST EMISSIONS FROM LARGE
STORAGE PILE AT  NANTICOKE TGS  ............  232
  N. Krishnamurthy, W. Whitman and Y.V.  Nguyen

                        Section C -  Opacity

MODELING SMOKE PLUME OPACITY FROM PARTICULATE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT .................  242
  D.S.  Ensor, P. A. Lawless, S.J. Cowen

TETHERED BALLOON PLUME SAMPLING  OF  A  PORTLAND
CEMENT PLANT ...................  252
  J.A.  Armstrong, P. A. Russell, M.N. Plooster

THE RELATIONSHIP OF FLY ASH LIGHT ABSORPTION TO
SMOKE  PLUME OPACITY  ................  264
  S.J. Cowen, D.S. Ensor

                      Section D -  Measurements

A SPECIAL METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF
SULFURIC ACID MISTS   ................  275
  P. Urone,  R.B. Mitchell, J.E.  Rusnak, R.A. Lucas and
  J.F.  Griffiths
                               XX

-------
VOLUME IV CONTENTS (cont.)


A MICROCOMPUTER-BASED CASCADE-IMPACTOR
DATA-REDUCTION SYSTEM	285
  M.  Durham, S. Tegtmeyer,  K. Wasmundt and L.E. Sparks

DEVELOPMENT OF A SAMPLING TRAIN FOR  STACK
MEASUREMENT OF INHALABLE PARTICULATE	297
  A.D. Williamson, W.B. Smith

INHALABLE PARTICULATE MATTER SAMPLING
PROGRAM FOR IRON AND STEEL:  AN OVERVIEW
PROGRESS REPORT	306
  R.C. McCrillis

DEVELOPMENT OF IP EMISSION FACTORS	317
  D.L. Harmon

INHALABLE PARTICULATE EMISSION FACTOR PROGRAM
PURPOSE AND DEVELOPMENT	326
  P.M. Noonan and J.H. Southerland

INHALABLE PARTICULATE EMISSION FACTORS FOR BLAST
FURNACE CASTHOUSES IN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY .  .   .  .335
  P.O. Spawn, S. Piper and S. Gronberg

INHALABLE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS FROM VEHICLES
TRAVELING ON PAVED ROADS	344
  R.  Bonn

QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR PARTICLE-SIZING MEASUREMENTS  .   .  .353
  C.E. Tatsch

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CHARACTERIZATION FOR
OIL-FIRED BOILERS	363
  D.  Mormile, S. Hersh, B.F.  Piper and M.  McElroy

A CONTINUOUS REAL-TIME PARTICULATE MASS MONITOR
FOR  STACK EMISSION  APPLICATIONS	373
  J.C.F. Wang, H. Patashnick and G. Rupprecht

                     Section E - Mobile Sources

STUDIES OF PARTICULATE REMOVAL FROM DIESEL EXHAUSTS
WITH ELECTROSTATIC AND ELECTROSTATICALLY-
AUGMENTED TECHNIQUES	383
  J.L.  DuBard, M.G. Faulkner, J.R. McDonald, D.C.  Drehmel
  and J.H. Abbott
                              xxi

-------
VOLUME IV CONTENTS (cont.)
                    v                                       Page

STUDIES OF PARTICULATE REMOVAL FROM DIESEL EXHAUSTS
WITH MECHANICAL TECHNIQUES	395
  M.G. Faulkner, J.L. DuBard, J.R. McDonald, D.C. Drehmel
  and J.H.  Abbott

UPDATE ON STATUS OF CONNECTICUT'S CONTROL PROGRAM
FOR TRANSPORTATION-RELATED PARTICULATE EMISSIONS .   .  .   .406
  H.L. Chamberlain and J.H. Gastler

AUTHOR INDEX	413
                            xxii

-------
                    COAL PROPERTIES  AND FLY ASH FILTERABILITY

                                 Richard Dennis

                                  John A.  Dirgo

                             GCA/Technology Division
                               213 Burlington Road
                               Bedford, MA  01730

                                 Louis S. Hovis

                  Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                        Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
ABSTRACT
    The results of a survey of U.S. coal sources, types, compositions,
production, and use are described with the emphasis on coals whose combustion
effluents are controllable with fabric filters.  Physical and chemical
properties of these coals and their mineral constituents were evaluated for
potential impact on resultant fly ashes.  Several characterizing criteria
commonly used to delineate coal fouling and slagging properties were examined
for probable impact upon fly ash size and surface properties.  Consideration
was also given to the method of coal combustion, operating temperatures,
fusion and hardness properties of mineral constituents, and slag viscosity as
possible factors in determining fly ash filtration characteristics.  High
alkalinity contents were examined for their potential to increase fly ash gas
and moisture sorption.  A major purpose of the survey was to provide a
rationale for selecting representative fly ash samples for laboratory
determination of the specific resistance coefficient (K2) and the cleaning
parameter (ac).

BACKGROUND

    Reliable predictions of fabric filter performance depend upon accurate
determination of two important variables: 10), the specific resistance
coefficient for the dust; and ac, the cleaning parameter.1»2  Although
many factors influence the filtration process, the variable indicating the air
permeability properties of the dust layer (K2) and the parameter defining
the fraction of the surface dust layer removed by the cleaning action (ac)
play commanding roles in those filter systems cleaned by reverse flow air
and/or by mechanical shaking.  Because of limitations in the existing theory,
direct measurements of K£ and ac represent the only safe way to evaluate
these parameters.  For this reason, GCA has performed under EPA sponsorship
several filtration research programs involving both the prediction and direct
measurement of K£ and ac:  Contracts 68-02-1438, Task 5; 68-02-2607, Tasks
7 and 8; and 68-02-2607, Technical Directive 35.  The objective of the

-------
on-going program (Contract No. 68-02-3151) is to augment the available
K2-ac data base by searching for definitive relationships between parent
coal properties and the filterability of the resultant fly ashes.

    This paper reviews the background phase of this study involving the actual
sample selection and the identification of relevant coal and fly ash
properties.  First, a rationale for the selection of specific coal fly ashes
for laboratory evaluation was established based upon a detailed survey of U.S.
coal production statistics and the projected use of these coals in energy
generation processes where fabric filtration might be used for control of
particulate emissions.  Second, after determining what appeared to be
representative statistics for fly ash sources and coal consumption, coal
properties and other factors affecting the filterability of the resultant fly
ashes were considered.  These included the mineralogical composition of coal
seam overburdens, floors, and partings; probable changes associated with the
preparation of coal for combustion; and the impact of the combustion process
itself upon fly ash characteristics.

PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF U.S. COAL PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION

    Coal production and use statistics given in Table 1 show the estimated
tonnages of lignite, subbituminous, and bituminous coals that are mined in the
six major U.S. coal regions and combusted in utility and industrial
energy-generating operations.  These data show that nearly 80 percent of the
coal is produced in the Eastern and Midwestern U.S. whereas current Western
output is only about 20 percent.3  However, the increase in coal production
to supply new, large (2,000 MW) power stations in the West is expected to
change this balance.  It should also be noted that the latter region is the
source and the primary user of lignite coals.

    Figure 1 shows the geographical distribution of major U.S. coal fields,
the types of coal mined, and the locations of coal-burning industries and
utilities that now use fabric filtration for particulate collection.^  Coal
delivery statistics demonstrate that most coal is burned in the region in
which it is mined, and the average transportation distance of U.S. coal is
only 592 km.5  Detailed information concerning coal production and
properties for various regions, districts, and seams may be found in the
Keystone Coal Manual and related publications.69?

    The production statistics in Table 1 were used to establish a preliminary
weighting for the selection of fly ash samples based upon emission potential.
This weighting,  however, could be modified to take into account any unusual
coal and fly ash properties that might conceivably bias the original selection.

-------
ANALYSES OF COAL AND FLY ASH PROPERTIES

Proximate Analyses and Sulfur Content

    Proximate analyses, which describe the  properties  used  to  assign coal
rankings, do not include those  factors suspected  to exert first order effects
on fly ash filterability via their  impacts  on particle size.   However, the
moisture and ash content can affect significantly the  magnitude of the
uncontrolled emissions and, in  turn,  the  design capacity and frequency of
baghouse cleaning.  It is  also  possible that  the  fuel  composition with respect
to moisture, ash, volatiles, and fixed carbon may have some bearing on the
ultimate size of the non-coal mineral constituents (overburdens, partings, and
floors) discharging from the pulverizers.   Additionally, as ash content
increases, less heat may transfer to the  particles for a fixed energy input,
thus retarding or preventing particle transformation  to the fluid state.

    Approximate average values  for  volatiles,  sulfur,  ash,  and moisture
contents for the six coal-producing regions are shown in Figure 2.  Despite
the broad range in coal analyses (and with  allowances  for variability in
mining, cleaning, and  assaying  techniques), three general coal groups are
discernable.  Eastern  coals represented by  Regions I  through III are
characterized by medium to high volatile  content,  ~2  percent sulfur, low (6 to
8 percent) ash, and low (4 percent) moisture.   Because of the  high ash and
moisture levels for Midwestern  coals, the heating values are usually lower
while  the high sulfur  content adds  to the overall emissions control problems.
In  the case of Western Region VI coals, sulfur contents are consistently low,
the volatile contents  high, and, with the exception of lignites, the ash and
moisture contents are  similar to those  for  Midwestern coals.   The fact that
electrostatic precipitators may perform less  effeciently with  low sulfur coals
suggests that the filtration option may be  the better approach with many
Western coals.

Mineralogy of Coal Seam Overburdens, Partings, and Floors

    Certain minerals are associated with  the  common rock structures
surrounding or separating  coal  seams as distinguished from  the inorganic
materials encapsulated in  the parent vegetable matter from  which the coals
were  formed.  The relative hardness, chemical constituents, and fusion
properties of such minerals are expected  to affect particle size properties,
chemical activity, and hygroscopicity of  the  fly  ash.   Generally, the
similarities among  the mineral  fractions  of most  coals tend to outweigh the
differences.  Claystones,  shales, sandstones,  and slate represent typical
constituents that appear  in many combinations in  U.S.  coal  formations."''
In  the case of sandstones  with  high quartz  contents,  one might expect to find
larger ash particles and  fewer  fusion products (cenospheres) in the fly ash
because of the hardness and high melting  point for quartz.  Conversely, if
dolomitic species are  the  predominant sandstone component,  pulverizing should
produce finer particles because of  increased  friability.  Reaction of calcined
components with sulfur oxides may also produce a  family of  hygroscopic
reaction products in the form of sulfites,  sulfates,  and bisulfites that may
contribute to the formation of  a "sticky" dust layer.

-------
    Chemical assays alone may not be sufficient to determine what effect the
mineral content of the coal has upon the actual fly ash filtration
characteristics.  For example, it is expected that any inorganic species
originating within the coal will appear in a finely subdivided form such that
its capacity to react rapidly with flue gas components and to form finer
particles far exceeds that of the coarser rock phase.  The specific
combinations of inorganic constituents may also play important roles in
controlling the fusion and slag forming properties of the coal ash which, in
turn, may impact strongly upon the quantity, shape, and size of the
uncontrolled fly ash emissions.

Physical Properties and Characterizing Chemical Ratios for Typical U.S. Coal
Ashes

    The manner  in which certain coal properties and various characterizing
chemical ratios are postulated to affect fly ash collectability is indicated
in Table 2.  Although this listing was developed mainly from selected
information sources on boiler slagging and fouling problems,^>° these data
also provide useful guidelines pertaining to the structure of the coal fly ash
particles and their ultimate behavior in a filter system.  Exclusive of those
ash properties  that relate to the combustion and heat transfer aspects of the
boiler operation, four factors may be identified that affect the fly ash
filterability.  These are ash melting or fusion temperatures, ash viscosity,
the capacity to react with gases and/or to absorb moisture, and the ability to
retain or lose  electrical charge as a function of fly ash resistance
properties.

Acid/Base Ratios—
    Listings of the principal elements found in various U.S. coal ashes
expressed as their percent oxide equivalent are presented in Table 3 along
with their characterizing acid/base (A/B) ratios.  As indicated in Table 2,
very high or very low A/B ratios are usually associated with high melting
point ashes.  Conversely, minimal melting points with a rapid transition from
the solid to the liquid phase are observed with a 50:50 mix, Figure 3.
Assuming that ash fusion temperatures are roughly proportional to the
softening temperatures, data presented in Table 3 appear to support the
suggested correlation.  Further details on mineral constituents and
characterizing  ratios, Table 4 and Figure 4, while indicating the variability
in components from one area to another, also show that the A/B ratios for
coals mined in  the same regions or from seams that cross regional boundaries
are generally similar.  The numerical indices refer only to contiguous or
geologically related seams and not to the previously defined coal Regions I
through VI.

Silica/Alumina  Ratio and Dolomite Percentage—
    Examination of the softening temperatures given in Table 3 indicates no
apparent correlation with either the silica/alumina ratio or the dolomite
percentage.  According to the theoretical effects proposed in Table 2,
softening and melting point temperatures and slag viscosity should increase as
either ratio increases.  Figure 4 also reveals that as far as the

-------
silica/alumina ratio is concerned,  there  are no  characterizing values
associated with the arbitrary geographical  (1  through  3)  locations.

Iron Oxide (Percent of Total Oxides) —
    With few exceptions,  iron oxide (Fe203> concentrations  expressed as
percent of total oxides also showed very  consistent  relationships with respect
to the three geographical areas  cited in  Table 4 and Figure 4.  Additionally,
F6203 exhibited a good inverse correlation with  the  A/B ratio indicating
that the Si02 and Al£03 contents increased  at  the expense of a dimin-
ished Fe203 content.  It  was concluded  that high Fe2<>3 concentrations
are indicative of A/B ratios close  to unity.   Therefore,  one can infer that a
lower melting point and less viscous slag will result  with  the potential to
generate a larger population of  smaller cenospheres  in the  fly ash.  This
concept is also partially supported by  the  softening temperature versus
      data shown in Table 3.
Sulfur-Iron Balance —
    The  sulfur-iron  balance indicates  the  extent  to  which  the  total  sulfur
content  can be  removed by pyrite  separation in coal  upgrading.  A  low ratio
suggests that the  coal sulfur is  mainly organically  bound  and  thus more likely
to  appear in the flue  gas where it can adsorb  on,  or react with, the alkaline
constituents of the  ash.   Conversion to soluble sulfur  compounds such as
alkali metal sulfites, bisulfites, and sulfates that are subsequently
collected on a  filter  may contribute to potential  plugging unless  baghouse
temperatures are maintained well  above the dewpoint.  At high  total  sulfur
contents,  a smaller  fraction of iron should appear in the  pyrite form.
Furthermore, it has  been suggested that a  reduction  in  the pyrite  content
might indicate  more  iron in the lower  oxidation state, H a condition
observed to improve  ash fluxing properties and to  decrease fusion
temperatures.   Total sulfur contents of several Alabama coals** were  examined
as  potential melting property indicators.   When ash  softening  temperatures
were plotted against total sulfur content, the random point  scatter  failed to
support  any positive correlation  between the two  variables or  between fluxing
effects  and the implied iron valence state.

Total Ash Content —
    The  effect  of  ash content upon ash fusion  properties was examined to
determine if an increase in coal  ash content might conceivably result in less
heat transfer to individual mineral particles  because of the dilution factor
(less heat per  particle).  Such a process  might be expected  to produce
generally coarser  and  more irregularly shaped  fly  ash particles.   Although
analyses of field  data indicated  a possible correlation between ash  content
and softening points,  the relationship was too weak  statistically  to be of
predictive value.  Regardless of  any possible  impact upon  particle size
parameters or softening temperatures,  filtration  demands (cloth and  fan
capacity) will  automatically relate to the volume  of fly ash produced which,
in  turn,  should relate directly to the amount  of  mineral present in  the parent
coal.

-------
Coal Firing Method Versus Fly Ash Properties

    The method of coal firing is expected to influence fly ash size properties
in two ways.  The degree of size reduction prior to firing determines the
parent size of the fly ash constituents of the coal; i.e., that fraction of
the inorganic solids contributed by the coal seam overburden, parting, or
floor minerals.  In the case of pulverized coal-fired boilers, the typical
aerosolized material is described as 70 percent by weight less than 200 mesh
(~74 pm).  Cyclone-fired boilers ordinarily use a coarser grind, 4-14 mesh,
whereas stoker coals are only crushed sufficiently to permit uniform grate
loadings by the feeding mechanism.

    If the size reduction process alone were the controlling factor, the ash
from a pulverized coal firing system should be the finest followed by the
cyclone boiler and stoker-fired products, respectively.  However, the added
inertial separation feature of a cyclone boiler produces a fly ash effluent
even finer than that generated by pulverized coal firing.  It should be noted
that the potential for producing high NOX concentrations makes doubtful the
large-scale growth of this combustion system.  In the case of stoker-fired
boilers, the fly ash in the uncontrolled effluent is not only the coarsest but
also likely to contain more unburned coal than the other effluents.  As
expected, the use of fly ash re-injection with spreader stokers results in a
somewhat finer ash.  At this time, the relationships between fly ash size and
firing method are restricted to qualitative applications because of measuring
problems, variations in system geometries and particulate residence times in
the systems, and settlement factors (bottom versus fly ash).  Nevertheless, it
is important that the firing method be considered along with other factors
suspected to affect the ultimate filterability of coal fly ash.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

    An investigation of coal production and utilization statistics in
conjuncton with the identification of coal properties, treatment, and
combustion procedures that might affect fly ash filterability was performed to
establish a basis for selecting representative fly ash samples for detailed
study.  A determination of key filtration parameters,  K£ and ac,
describing filter resistance and fabric cleanability,  respectively, is now
underway to permit broader applications of the EPA filtration model.2
Analyses of the data base developed for this study provided the rationale for
the conclusions on fly ash selection listed below:

    1.   The number of fly ash samples to be investigated for any coal type
         should reflect the best projections for current and future use of
         that coal in applications where fabric filters can provide the
         particulate emission control.  For example, Region VI coals have been
         given an increased weighting because of projections for much
         increased future usage and the unusually high ash contents of some
         lignite coals.

-------
    2.    Basic coal properties, as delineated by proximate analyses, are
         similar for Regions I, II, and III.  Thus, fly ash samples obtained
         from cooperating utilities and industries that burn coal from these
         regions can be treated as a single class.  The approximate number of
         samples will be based on the combined regional output used for power,
         steam, and heat generating purposes.

    3.    The distribution of fly ash samples should be representative of the
         principal coal firing methods.  Although pulverized coal firing is
         far more common on the basis of fuel consumption, there are fewer and
         sometimes more conflicting data available on the properties of
         uncontrolled fly ash emissions from stoker-fired boilers.  Therefore,
         increased sampling above that suggested by the fuel use criterion is
         required for stoker-fired systems.

    4.    The physical properties of the mineral constituents of a coal
         considered most likely to affect fly ash properties are hardness and
         melting (and softening) point.  Both may affect fly ash size
         properties, the latter through its impact on slag viscosity.  Of the
         several characterizing ratios for mineral constituents claimed to
         affect slag viscosity, the acid/base ratio alone appears to have a
         predictive value.  Thus, when more than one sample is selected from
         any region, at least two A/B levels should be tested.

    5.    High calcinable mineral and/or sulfur contents contribute to
         increased fly ash hygroscopicity, which may present difficulties when
         baghouse temperatures are allowed to fall below the dewpoint.  Excess
         moisture condensation causes reduced dust cake porosity that leads to
         prohibitively high filter pressure loss.  On the other hand, although
         low sulfur coals present few condensation problems, an excess
         electrical charge accumulation may interfere with normal filtration
         processes.  Therefore, the fly ash sampling should include both low
         and high sulfur coals.

                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This project has been funded at least in part with Federal funds from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract 68-02-3151.  This paper
does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or
organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

                                   REFERENCES

 1.  Dennis, R. and J.A. Dirgo.  Comparison of Laboratory and Field Derived
     K£ Values for Dust Collected on Fabric Filters.  Proceedings,
     U.S.-Japan Scientific Seminar, Measurement and Control of Particulates
     Generated from Human Activities.  Kyoto, Japan.  November 10-14, 1980.

 2.  Dennis, R. and H.A. Klemm.  A Model for Coal Fly Ash Filtration.  J. Air
     Pollut. Control Assoc.  29:230-234 (1979).

-------
 3.   Energy Data Report.  Coal-Bituminous and Lignite  in 1976.   DOE/EIA-0118/1
     (1976).  Prepared in the Office of Energy Data  and  Interpretation, U.S.
     Department of Energy.  December 18, 1978.

 4.   Gibbs and Hill, Inc.  Coal Preparation for Combustion and  Conversion.
     Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute.   EPRI AF-791,  Project
     466-1, Final Report.  May 1978.

 5.   The Direct Use of Coal:  Prospects and Problems of  Production and
     Combustion.  Prepared by the Office of Technology Assessment,  Congress of
     the United States.  OTA-E-86.  April 1979.

 6.   Nielson, G.F. (Editor-in-Chief).  1979 Keystone Coal  Industry Manual.
     McGraw-Hill, Inc.  New York, New York.  1979.

 7.   Nielson, G.F. (Editor-in-Chief).  U.S. Coal Mine  Production by Seam -
     1976.  McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, New York.  1977.

 8.   Winegartner, E.G. (Editor).  Coal Fouling and Slagging Parameters, Report
     by ASME Research Committee on Corrosion and Deposits  from  Combustion
     Gases, ASME (1974).

 9.   White, H.J.  Electrostatic Precipitation Research,  Precipitator Design.
     J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.  27:206-217 (1977).

10.   Perry, R.H., C.H. Chilton, and S.D. Kirkpatrick (Editors).   Chemical
     Engineer's Handbook, 4th Ed.  Section 9, Table  9-2.   McGraw-Hill,  Inc.
     New York, New York.  1969.
11.   Plumley, A.L.  Fossil Fuel and the Environment, Present Systems  and Their
     Emissions.  Combustion Engineering, Inc.  October 1971.
                         WESTERN REGION
                                          IE EASTERN
                                          MIDWEST REGION
                                                  I NORTHERN APPALACHIAN
                                                            REGION
                                                           SOUTHERN
                                                          APPALACHIAN
                                                           REGION
                                                       HI ALABAMA
                                                         REGION
             Figure 1.  Coal Fields  of  The  United States and Sites
                         Selected to Obtain Fly
                                      8

-------
  20 •
 j.i (0) UP
    t UP TO 28% WITH LIGNITE
          COAL PRODUCING REGION
Figure 2.  Averaged  coal
            analyses  for
            major coal
            Regions.
                                          1600

                                          1500
                                      UJ
                                          I30°
                                          1200

                                          1100
                      O DATA POINTS
                        FROM REF. 9
                                                   x
                                                   o
                                              0

                                              i
                        20     50     80
                         PERCENT ACID
                       0.25    1.0     4.0
100

 !
                     ACID/BASE RATIO


                    I SILICA/ALUMINA RATIO)


                    I F«2°3
                        ACID/BASE RATIO

           Figure 3,   Effect of acid/base
                        ratio on  ash fusion
                        temperature.^
                                                   CC I0|- < 4
                                                   ro
                                                   O
                                                   CJ
         II)          (2)          13)
           REGION OR SEAM  LOCATION


Figure 4.   Characterizing  ratios
             versus  location of
             coal seam.   Refer to
             Table 4.
TABLE 1.
                                     ESTIMATED  COAL PRODUCTION  USED BY  UTILITIES AND
                                     INDUSTRY FOR ELECTRICAL POWER, STEAM, OR
                                     HEATING PURPOSES
Region
I .Northern Appalachian
II Southern Appalachian
III Alabama
IV Eastern Midwest
V Western Midwest
VI Western
Production
States 106 metric tons/year
PA,WV(n)*,OH,MD,MI
WV(s),VA,KY(e),TN(n)
AL,GA,TN(s)
KY(w),IN,IL
AR,IA,OK,KS,MO,TX
CO,WY,MT,SD,ND,DT,
NM,AZ,ID,WA,AK
128
110
13
120
23
95
(26. 2) f
(22.5)
(2.6)
(24.6)
(4.6)
(19.5)
                                 *Letters in parentheses refer to north, south, east, and west.
                                 Numbers in parentheses refer to percent of total.

-------
     TABLE  2.    CHARACTERIZING COAL  PROPERTIES  AND  PARAMETERS  THAT
                     MAY  AFFECT  FLY ASH FILTERABILITY
                     Property or parameter
                                                            Probable effect on fly ash
                                                              and Its fllterabtllty
               1. Ash Fusion Temperature
               2. Hardness (Grlndabillty)
               3. Silica/Alumina Ratio
               4. Acid/Base Ratio (A/B)
                     SiO,, AljOi. TIP,
                 FejOj, CaD, MgO, K20, Ha20

               5. Dolomite Percentage (D.P.)

                 100x
                     Fe203. CaO, MgO, K20, Ha20

               6. Sulfur-Iron Balance
                 	TotajMtejQj ini__ash	
                 Fe20j equivalent of 50 percent
                 of sulfur as FeSj

               7. Total Alkali Content (T.A.)
                 (Na20 -f K20) x (Ash)
               8. Water Soluble Content
                 Na and K content by boiling
                 and reflux in water.
More cenospheres, finer particles, and higher K2
at low fusion temperature.  More and larger irregular
particles at high fusion temperature and easier cleaning.

Larger particles, fewer cenospheres. and lower K2 with
harder minerals.

Lower ratio decreases viscosity and particle size with
higher Kz. more difficult cleaning.

Lower melting point and viscosity as A/B ratio approaches
unity; finer particles with higher K2 and more difficult
cleaning.

Slag viscosity and size Increase with dolomite percentage;
lower K2 and easier cleaning.


High sulfur to iron balance increases fly ash acidity and
hygroscoplclty; fabric plugging and chemical attack, minimal
electrical charge effects.


High alkali content increases  fly ash hygroscopicity and
stickiness (increased electrical conduction may Improve
ESP performance)

Increased solubles (usually Na and K) increase fly ash hygro-
scopicity and stickiness, reduced electrical resistivity.
                   : 1,3-5 ; Item 2'; Ite
TABLE  3.    SOFTENING TEMPERATURES,  ASH  CONSTITUENTS AND  CHARACTERIZING
                RATIOS  FOR  SEVERAL  U.S.  COALS10
Coal Source
Montana
Subbltunlnous
Illinois
Bituminous
Pennsylvania
Bituminous
West Virginia
Bituminous
Kentucky
Bituminous
Softening
temper atur
•c
1130
1270
1370
1500
>1595

S10Z
30.7
46.2
49.7
51.0
58.5
Coal ash
A120,
19.6
22.9
26.8
30.9
30.6
Fe20,
18.9
7.7
11.4
10.7
4.2
analysis* percent
T102
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.9
1.8
CaO
11.3
10.1
4.2
2.1
2.0
MgO
3.7
1.6
o.a
0.9
0.4
Na20
KiO
2.4
1.5
2.9
1.4
1.6
Acid/
SOa ratio
12.2 1.42
8.9 3.35
2.5 4.03
0.6 5.55
0.9 11.1
Silica/
Alumina
ratio
1.57
2.02
1.85
1.65
1.91
Dolomite
percentage
41
56
26
20
29
         TABLE  4.    CHEMICAL  CONSTITUENTS  OF TYPICAL  COAL  ASHES

                         EXPRESSED  AS PERCENT  OF  TOTAL OXIDES^

                                                                               Silica/
                                                                      Acid/base* alumina
                                 S102 A1203  Fez03 CaO  MgO Ha,0  KjO  SOj   ratio     ratio
Alabama,
Tuscaloosa County
Illinois,
Stark County
Schuyler County
Kentucky,
Pike County
Bell County
Ohio County
Ohio,
Belmont County
Jefferson County
Noble County
Pennsylvania,
Bedford County
Allegheny County
Butler County
West Virginia,
Barbour County
Fayette County
Kanawha County

48.2

42.1
48.0

52.0
46.9
49.3

42.4
50.4
36.7

57.7
49.2
26.9

52.5
48.5
37.9

28.4

20.1
14.7

34.5
28.4
19.4

19.6
23.2
19.9

32.1
24.8
18.2

35.6
30.1
23.8

15.1

22.8
18.7

6.4
12.0
27.4

27.5
21.9
37.8

5.1
20.3
52.5

6.1
13.6
31.4

1.8

6.6
10.4

1.9
2.7
1.8

4.8
1.9
1.8

1.7
1.8
1.2

1.8
1.8
2.0

0.8

1.1
0.6

0.6
2.0
0.7

1.2
0.5
0.6

0.9
0.5
0.4

0.6
0.8
0.5

0.3

0.5
0.2

0.5
0.2
0.2

0.2
0.1
0.2

0.2
0.2
0.2

0.2
0.7
0.5

1.2 2.4

1.9 2.0
1.8 2.1

3.3 0.8
2.0 4.5
1.9 0.2

1.6 2.0
1.0 0.4
1.4 0.7

2.6 0.2
3.6 1.3
1.0 0.8

1.9 0.9
2.6 1.3
0.5 2.9

4,

1.
2,

6.
4,
2,

1,
2,
2,

a,
2,

134

.95
.04

.85
.54
.22

.81
.90
.08

.57
.84
0.83

8.
4,
1.

.39
.02
.85

(1)

(2)
(2)

(1)
(1)
(2)

(2)
(2)
(2)

(3)
(2)
(2)

(3)
CD
(2)

1.7

2.09
3.26

1.51
1.66
2.54

2.16
2.17
1.84

1.80
1.98
1.48

1.47
1.61
1.60
                 *Numbers in parentheses designate arbitarary geographical locations for coal se
                 expected to display similar mineral assays.
                                                   10

-------
            PULSE-JET FILTRATION WITH ELECTRICALLY CHARGED FLYASH

              By:  R.P. Donovan
                   Research Triangle Institute
                   P.O. Box 12194
                   Research Triangle Park, N.C.  27709

                   L.S. Hovis, G.H. Ramsey, J.H. Abbott
                   Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Research Triangle Park, N.C.  27711

                                  ABSTRACT

     Pulse-jet performance equations differ from those of reverse-air-cleaned
or shaker-cleaned baghouses, especially when operated at high air-to-cloth
ratios as has been described by Leith, Ellenbecker, Dennis, and others.   These
differing performance equations imply that dust electrical charge should
influence pulse-jet performance differently than, say, shaker-baghouse per-
formance.  Measurement protocol distinguishing between conventional pulse-jet
operation and a "dust cake" mode of pulse-jet operation is described and the
initial results of an experimental program derived from this distinction are
presented.  Comparisons with the shaker baghouse are emphasized.
                                    TEXT

     Electrical charge as a means of enhancing fabric filtration performance
is receiving a "big play" in the contemporary fabric filtration literature
(Cooper, 1979; Ariman and Helfritch, 1980).  Previously reported EPA in-house
research with actively charged flyash systems has been carried out with the
shaker baghouse (Hovis, et al., 1981; Donovan, et al., 1981).   This paper
describes complementary work initiated in the EPA pulse-jet baghouse in which
flyashes similar to those tested in the shaker baghoue are used in various
operating modes of the pulse jet.  The capability of experimenting with simi-
lar flyashes, either uncharged or charged, provides insights into the mecha-
nisms of the two types of filtration equipment and also helps  to isolate
charge effects and charge-affected mechanisms of filtration.

     This paper begins by reviewing important differences between pulse-jet
fabric filtration and shaker-cleaned fabric filtration.  Models of charge-
enhanced fabric filtration often attribute the enhancement to  a charge-
induced increase in dust-cake porosity (Cooper, 1979).  Because of significant
differences between the dust cake on a shaker-cleaned woven fabric and the
dust layer on a pulse-jet-cleaned felt fabric, such dust-cake  porosity models
immediately alert one to anticipate that a different charge interaction could
dominate each of these two common techniques of fabric filtration.

     Much of the work to be presented here was undertaken in an attempt to
distinguish between these two operating modes and the effect of dust electri-
cal charge on each; particular emphasis is placed on operating the pulse-jet
equipment in the "dust cake" mode.  This experimental, non-practical mode of

                                     11

-------
pulse-jet operation simulates the shaker cycle in that it features long filtra-
tion periods (9-120 minutes), followed by a multi-pulsed (40 pulses), off-line
cleaning prior to the next filtration cycle.  The reason for such non-standard
operation is to be able to form a dust cake in the pulse jet and to produce a
dust-cake-layer-dominated AP  characteristic by which performance can be
measured, and from which charge dependence of the performance can be detected.

     In the description of the pulse-jet apparatus, emphasis is placed on
those equipment properties that are expected to influence charged-dust filtra-
tion differently than in the  shaker baghouse.  The Results section also includes
shaker-baghouse results with  which various performance comparisons are made.

Background

     Conventional pulse-jet operation refers to fabric filtration which features,
in addition to bag cleaning by a short (typically 50-150 ms) burst of compres-
sed air fired down the bag through a venturi nozzle:   outside collection, on-
line cleaning, higher superficial gas flows than shaker or reverse-air cleaned
units, and shorter intervals  between cleaning cycles than the typical shaker or
reverse-air unit.  Departures from one or more of these properties are common-
place; however, not all pulse jets use Venturis (some don't even use an aimed
blow pipe above the bags but  resort to a more remote pulse-control mechanism
as in the plenum-pulse design), not all pulse jets are outside collectors (some
are cageless with strictly induced pulse cleaning initiated at the bag bottom) ,
and more and more pulse jet operators are resorting to off-line cleaning.  In
short, the term pulse jet no  longer adequately defines a specific standardized
fabric filtration operation—if it ever did.  The key properties of what is
defined in this paper as "conventional" pulse-jet operation are:

     1.   a residual dust load in/on the fabric that is large with respect to
          the fresh dust fed  between successive cleaning pulses;
     2.   a low cleaning efficiency in the sense that only a small percentage
          of the dust load on the fabric is transferred to the hopper in any
          single cleaning cycle; and

     3.   significant dust redeposition after a cleaning pulse because of the
          on-line cleaning.

     These properties of the "conventional" mode of operating a pulse jet fol-
low from the process descriptions of Dennis and Klemm (1980), Ellenbecker and
Leith (1979, 1980), Leith and First (1977), Leith and Ellenbecker (1980), and
Leith, et al., (1980).  These publications emphasize the differences between
pulse-jet fabric-filter performance equations and the ideal Darcy equations
which have been used to predict shaker or reverse-air baghouse performance by
modeling filtration as a dust-cake dominated process.

     Particular attention is drawn to the presence of the larger quantity of
dust that remains on the bag during conventional pulse-jet filtration when
compared to dust-cake filtration processes.  This retained dust is not neces-
sarily all residual dust that is never removed from the bag, but may consist of
cleaned dust that has redeposited on the bags rather than fall to the hopper.
Regardless, its presence adversely affects conventional pulse-jet performance

                                      12

-------
and limits the range of practical operating gas-to-cloth ratios.

     That the performance of a conventional pulse jet depends so strongly on
retained dust implies that understanding the effect of dust electrical charge
in a conventional pulse jet will require knowledge of not only the incoming
dust charge but also that of the retained dust layer.  In addition the influ-
ence of dust charge upon the various interactions (such as initial capture,
cleaning efficiency, and redeposition) must be known.  From these considera-
tions the conventional pulse-jet problem is expected to be more complicated
than dust-cake filtration in, say,  the shaker baghouse.

     For these reasons a preliminary experimental program has been defined
prior to addressing the conventional pulse-jet problem.  In this initial
phase of the EPA/IERL-RTP in-house  program, the pulse-jet equipment is
operated in a "dust-cake" mode which implies the following modifications:

     1.   filtration periods sufficiently long to build a dust cake on the
          fabric, analogous to that in a shaker operation; and

     2.   off-line cleaning in which multiple pulses are fired through all
          bags simultaneously and in sufficient number to reduce the residual
          dust areal density to 250-300 g/m2.

     The fabrics and superficial velocities of filtration used, however, are
those typical of conventional pulse-jet filtration.  The goal is to under-
stand the dust collection process and the influence of dust charge upon it
before  considering the effects of dust charge upon the dominating effects of
conventional pulse-jet cleaning.  In addition the pulse-jet equipment lends
itself  to crude bag weighing and thus enables direct measurements of total
dust gain by the bags during a given filtration cycle.  This information is
particularly valuable in separating charge-related dust-cake porosity effects
from precharger dust collection effects, a difficult separation to make with
the shaker baghouse  (Hovis, et al., 1981).

Apparatus

     The in-house laboratory pulse-jet baghouse is a commercially available,
nine-bag Mikro-Pul baghouse operated as previously described by Turner (1977).
It consists of three rows of three  bags each.  Each bag is mounted on the
shoulder of a venturi nozzle which  itself is sealed to a tube sheet.  A blow
pipe is positioned above each row with an orifice opposite the bag mouth.
Cleaning pulses were drawn from a 90-psi  (620 kPa) reservoir of compressed air
for all data to be reported.

     Dirty air enters the hopper beneath the bags and flows through the bags
outside-in.  The bags are mounted on steel cages to prevent collapse during
filtration.

     To this standard apparatus various additions have been made as shown in
Figure  1.  A prime addition is that of the corona precharger shown in the in-
let duct.  This precharger consists of a single wire mounted along the center-
line of the inlet duct.  The corona discharge by which the incoming dust is

                                      13

-------
charged occurs along the 1/16-inch (1.6 mm) welding rod shown protruding from
the larger diameter mount.  The larger diameter mount is held in position by
two Teflon standoffs which extend across the diameter of the duct and through
which the high voltage is routed to the wire.

     This location of a precharger suffers from two shortcomings:

     1.   the remoteness of its location from the bags;  and

     2.   the high speed of the gas flow through the precharger and hence the
          short charging time available for charging the dust.

     Simple calculations suggest that, in spite of the short residence time in
the corona region, significant dust charging can occur with this precharger
design (Appendix 1).  Charge loss between the precharger and the bags proved
difficult to sample and measure accurately so a second precharger design
(Figure 2) was built to mount immediately beneath the bags in a region that is
both nearer the bags and in a region of lower linear gas flow than the duct
precharger.  Most of the dust-cake mode data were taken with this second pre-
charger design, called the plenum precharger.

     The plenum precharger design, however, does not match up well with the
study of conventional pulse-jet service because it is located between the dust
on the bags and the hopper.  Dust removed from the bag by the pulse-jet clean-
ing action then must pass through the precharger to reach the hopper and hence
is subject to capture by the precharger.  Even some dust that normally would
be redeposited could be captured by the precharger electric field because of
its location.  Hence, this precharger location complicates data interpretation.

     The duct charger, on the other hand, is out of the dust path between the
bags and the hopper and, in addition, operates with little dust capture in the
duct itself, although wall capture by the hopper and lower baghoue chamber will
still be enhanced when the precharger is ON.  Stable precharger operation is
easier to achieve with this arrangement, however.

     Other ports have also been added to the baghouse as illustrated in Figure
1.  Two ports for inserting an impactor into the baghouse chamber now exist.
This in-the-housing capability minimizes probe losses during impactor sampling.

     The test dusts used in the pulse-jet experiments are the same Southwestern
Public Service (SPS) flyash and Detroit Edison flyash (DBF) used in the shaker-
baghouse experiments (Hovis, et al.. 1981).  While the inlet dust concentra-
tion in the pulse jet is generally higher than in the shaker baghouse (4 gr/
ft3 [9 g/m3] vs 3 gr/ft3  [7 g/m3]), the hopper fallout characteristic of this
particular pulse-jet operation (~ 50%) reduces the dust concentration reaching
the bags to about 2 gr/ft3 (4.5 g/m3).  Hopper fallout in the top fed shaker
unit is essentially zero.

     Most of the data to be reported in the pulse jet were taken at an oper-
ating air-to-cloth ratio of 9 ft/min (4.5 cm/sec).  This value is more than
double the 4 ft/min (2 cm/sec) superficial velocity at which the shaker oper-
ates.   Relative humidity in both baghouses is controlled by the same Inreco®

                                      14

-------
controller— the same feedhouse that encloses the pulse- jet hopper also en-
closes the shaker-baghouse hopper.

     The only fabric used in the pulse- jet  tests to be reported is a needled
polyester felt weighing 16 oz/yd2.  These bags were purchased from Mikro Pul.

     This fabric style is the second major  difference (next to cleaning tech-
nique) between the pulse-jet experiments and the shaker experiments.

Results

     Most of the evaluations of charged dust effects in pulse- jet fabric
filtration carried out in the EPA pulse jet have been made in the dust-cake
mode prevously described.  This mode allows a separation of charge effects on
fresh incoming dust from those on the retained or redeposited dust.  In the
dust-cake mode, only off-line cleaning is carried out; the only evaluating
measurements, in addition to the usual pressure drop and flow-rate records,
are total bag weight before and after the cleaning.  The measurement procedure,
beginning with cleaned bags, thus is:

     1.   Remove bags from baghouse and weigh, one at a time.  Reinstall bags
          in identical slots from which removed.

     2.   Run under desired test conditions.

     3.   At end of run, slip a plastic cover over each bag; remove and weigh
          each bag.

     4.   Reinstall bags and clean with 40  pulses at 90 psi (620 kPa) .

     5.   Repeat Step 1.

     For these dust-cake mode measurements, only three bags were used;  the
other six slots of the nine-bag baghouse were capped off.  The three bags were
mounted on one row (Row 2) so that they were cleaned simultaneously; the
cleaning control was rewired so that only this row was actuated for cleaning.

     Figure 3 is a sketch of a typical pressure trace operating in the dust-
cake mode.  In contrast to the shaker baghouse pressure trace, all the pulse-
jet pressure traces initially exhibited what Dennis and Klemm (Nov., 1980)
describe as concave-up behavior; but, if allowed to continue for long periods
of time and to build up large pressure drops, the traces eventually displayed
linear behavior from which a specific dust-cake resistance (Kj) could be esti-
mated.  Because the length of this initial  non-linear region is a significant
fraction of the typical filtration period,  the K2 calculation was modified as
follows:
                                  (AP  - AP   )A
where APF, ^PDCQ)  tj,  and  t2  are  defined  in Figure  3;

       A = total fabric  area;
                                      15

-------
      m  = total weight gain of all bags during the filtration period tz; and

       V = the gas-to-cloth ratio.

     The (t2-ti)/t2 correction assumes that only that fraction of the total
dust gain of the bags that occurred during the linear buildup region is appro-
priate for the K.2 calculation—the  earlier dust deposit is at some lower
effective K£ rate and represents a  dust/felt interface (or other non-dust-cake)
property.  The corresponding pressure drop (AP  - APDCQ)  of the linear region
is used in the numerator of Equation (1).

     Tables 1 and 2 summarize measurements for DBF and SPS flyash, respectively.
K.2 in these tables has been calculated by Equation (1), using the (t2-ti)/t2
correction factor when a clearly defined linear region exists in the experi-
mental pressure trace.  Otherwise (t2-tj)/t2 was set equal to 1.  A major
effect of turning the plenum precharger ON is to reduce the quantity of flyash
reaching the bags, presumably because of precharger and wall capture.   This
effect repeats the observations of  the shaker baghouse (Hovis, et al., 1981).
The improved precharger performance with relative humidity (in the sense of en-
hanced flyash capture) also repeats in this pulse-jet arrangement.  At 70%
relative humidity the mass of flyash reaching the bags when the precharger is
ON is only 20-30% of that when the  precharger is OFF.  At 30% relative humidity
this ratio is greater.

     Values of K£ calculated by the mass corrected expression given by Equation
(1) do not show a significant dependence on dust charge for either of these
flyashes.  As was true for the shaker results, the dramatic change in the Ap
trace upon turning ON the precharger (Figure 4) is primarily explained as fly-
ash capture by the precharger, thus reducing the effective flyash feed rate to
the bags.  When this flyash loss is accounted for by direct bag weighing, the
K2 values calculated from Equation  (1) are similar for the charged and the
uncharged flyashes.

     As with the shaker data, this  conclusion does not rule out the charge-
induced porosity increase reported  by others (Chudleigh and Bainbridge, 1980;
Ariman and Helfritch, 1980; linoya  and Mori, 1980) so much as demonstrate
that such an effect is smaller in magnitude than the precharger collection
effect.  The bag weighing technique employed here is still a coarse measure-
ment that is time consuming and technique dependent.  Nonetheless the pre-
charger mass collection effect is clear, while the dependence of flyash
porosity on electrical charge is not.

Conventional Pulse-Jet Mode Results

     Some preliminary conventional  pulse-jet operation was carried out prior
to the dust-cake mode experiments just described.  These experiments were per-
formed with the full nine-bag complement of polyester felt bags filtering DBF.
The air-to-cloth ratio was 6 fpm (3 cm/sec) with an inlet dust concentration
of 4 gr/ft3 (9 g/m3).  Cleaning pulse pressure was 90 psi (620 kPa) and the
time interval between successive cleaning pulses was 60 sees so that each row
of three bags was cleaned on-line every 3 min.  Total airflow through the bag-
house was 250 acfm (7.08 m3/min) implying an average upward linear gas flow

                                      16

-------
between the hopper and the bags of 46 ft/min  (14 m/min).

     Only the duct precharger  (Appendix 1) was used in  these experiments and
the conclusion reached in a series of 6-hour  runs comparing precharger ON with
precharger OFF performance was that the precharger had  no significant influence
on either collection efficiency or pressure drop.

     This observation is consistent with  the  model of conventional pulse-jet
filtration described in the Background section of this  paper in which the
filtration properties are depicted as more dependent on the retained dust load
than on the dust freshly fed between cleaning pulses.   The implication of that
model is that the bag cleaning and the redeposition processes dominate the
performance rather than a dust parameter  such as inlet  concentration.  Varia-
tions in inlet concentration are  less important than the areal mass density of
the retained dust (Leith and Ellenbecker, 1980); the retained dust density
depends more on cleaning parameters than  inlet dust concentration (Dennis and
Klemm, 1980).

     Should the dominating effect of precharger operation prove to be a reduc-
tion in the rate of dust arriving at the  bags, as the dust-cake mode measure-
ments suggest, then the influence of precharger operation is predicted by
these models to be small.

     A new series of runs in the  conventional pulse-jet mode is now underway.
A major difference between this series and that previously carried out is that
continuous operation around-the-clock over an extended  period is planned, as
was done in the shaker baghouse experiments reported by Hovis, et al., (1981).
To accommodate this goal other modifications  have been  required:

     1.   the complement of bags  has been reduced from  nine to three—one bag
          per row, and
     2.   the total gas flow has  been reduced from 250  acfm (7.08 m3/min) to
          125 acfm  (3.54 m3/min), raising the air-to-cloth ratio from 6 ft/min
          (3 cm/sec) to 9 ft/min  (4.5 cm/sec)—the same as in the dust-cake
          pulse-jet work just  described.

Air pressure in the pulse reservoir remains at 90 psi  (620 kPa); the interval
between successive pulses is 47 sec so that each bag is cleaned every 141 sec.
The flyash concentration in the inlet remains at 4 gr/ft3 (9 g/m3).

     One observation already apparent in  this new series is the higher dust
loads of DEF building up on the fabric compared to the  SPS flyash loads.  This
result is surprising because of the higher AP'S and K^'s of the SPS flyash in
the shaker experiments.  But after 24-hr  operation in  the conventional pulse-
jet mode, a virgin polyester felt fabric  weighed in with more than 2-1/2 times
as much DEF as did a similar virgin fabric operating with the same filtration
parameters but using SPS flyash  (432 g/m2 DEF vs 154 g/m2 SPS flyash) .

     Establishment of long-term operating equlibriums,  with the precharger
both ON and OFF,  is now underway.
                                      17

-------
Conclusions

1.   The recognized differences between conventional pulse-jet operation and
     dust-cake filtration imply a different role of dust electrical charge in
     the two processes.

2.   Operating the pulse-jet equipment in a "dust cake" mode shows the domi-
     nant effect of charging the flyash with a corona precharger is to
     reduce the dust loads on the bags.
3.   Initial precharger-ON measurements in the conventional pulse-jet mode of
     operation fail to identify any performance effect of dust charging.

References

1.   Ariman, T. and D.J. Helfritch.  "Pressure Drop in Electrostatic Fabric
     Filtration."  Second Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization of Parti-
     culate Control Technology. Vol. Ill,  EPA-600/9-80-039c (NTIS PB81-144800),
     September 1980, pp.222-236.

2.   Chudleigh, P.W. and N.W. Bainbridge.   "Electrostatic Effects in Fabric
     Filters During Build-up of the Dust Cake."  Filtration and Separation,
     July/August 1980, pp.309-311.

3.   Cooper, D.W.  "Mechanisms for Electrostatic Enhancement of Filter Perfor-
     mance."  Invited paper presented to The Fiber Society and the Filtration
     Society Joint Symposium on Fibers, Electrostatics and Filtration,
     Princeton, NJ, November 14-15, 1979.

4.   Donovan, R.P., et al.  "Electrostatic Augmentation for Particulate
     Removal with Fabric Filters."  5th International Fabric Alternatives
     Forum Proceedings, January 1981, Scottsdale, AZ, American Air Filter,
     Louisville, KY.

5.   Dennis, R. and H.A. Klemm.  "Modeling Concepts for Pulse Jet Filtration."
     J. Air Poll. Cont. Assn., 30, January 1980, pp.38-43.

6.   Dennis, R. and H.A. Klemm.  "Recent Concepts Describing Filter System
     Behavior."  U.S./Japan Scientific Seminar on Measurement and Control of
     Particulates Generated from Human Activities.   Kyoto,  Nov. 10-14, 1980.

7.   Ellenbecker, M.J. and D. Leith.  "Theory for Dust Deposit Retention in a
     Pulse-Jet Fabric Filter."  Filtration and Separation.  November/December
     1979, pp.624-629.

8.   Ellenbecker, M.J. and D. Leith.  "The Effect of Dust Retention on Pres-
     sure Drop in a High Velocity Pulse-Jet Fabric Filter."  Powder Technology,
     25, 1980, pp.147-154.

9.   Hovis, L.S., et al.  "Electrically Charged Flyash Experiments in a
     Laboratory Shaker Baghouse."  Presentation to the Third Symposium on the
     Transfer and Utilization of Particulate Control Technology. March 1981,
     Orlando, FL (this proceedings).

                                      18

-------
10.  linoya, K. and Y.  Mori.  "Effects  of a Corona Precharger and Relative
     Humidity on Filter Performance."   Second Symposium on the Transfer  and
     Utilization of Particulate Control Technology. Vol.  Ill, EPA-600/9-80-
     039c (NTIS PB81-144800), September 1980, pp.237-250.

11.  Leith, D. and M.W. First.  "Pressure Drop in a Pulse-Jet Fabric Filter."
     Filtration and Separation, September/October 1977,  pp.473-480.

12.  Leith, D. and M.J. Ellenbecker.   "Theory for Penetration in a Pulse-Jet
     Cleaned Fabric Filter."  J. Air Poll. Contr. Assn.,  30. August 1980,  pp.
     877-881.

13.  Leith, D., et al.   "Performance of a High-Velocity Pulse-Jet Filter II."
     EPA-600/7-80-042 (NTIS PB80-183866), March 1980.

14.  Oglesby,  S. and  G.B. Nichols.  Electrostatic Precipitation, Marcel  Dekker
     Inc., New York,  NY (1978).

15.  Turner, J.H.  "EPA Research in Fabric Filtration:   Annual Report on IERL-
     RTP In-House Program."  EPA-600/7-77-042 (NTIS PB-267441), May 1977.

            TABLE 1.  DETROIT EDISON FLYASH FILTRATION IN THE PULSE JET (DUST CAKE MODE)

Charger
Status
OFF
ON
OFF
ON
OFF
ON

R.H.
(%)
70
70
30
30
70
70

Filtration
Time (min)
60
120
60
120
40
80

Total Dust
on Bags (g)
844
483
775
972
387
295

Feed Rate to
Bags (g/min)
14.1 )
4.0 )
12.9 )
8.1 j
9.7 )
3.7 )
Feed-Rate
Ratio
ON/OFF
0.28

0.63

0.38


Kj Ratio
ON/OFF
—

0.85

0.90

 	TABLE 2.  SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE FLYASH FILTRATION IN THE PULSE JET (DUST CAKE MODE)	

        Relative Filtration  Total Flyash  Feed Rate  Feed Rate           R-           K- Ratlo
 Charger Humidity    Time       Added     to Bags    Ratio                      *
 Status     (%)      (min)        (g)      (g/min)   (ON/OFF)  (in. of H20-min-ft/lb[m])   (ON/OFF)
OFF

ON
OFF
OFF

ON
OFF
30

30
30
70

70
70
18.5

40
13.2
18.6

40
9.0
443

312
304
400

169
189
23.9

7.8
23.0
21.5

4.2
21.0

\ 0.33
\ 0.34


1 0.20
I 0.20
13.8

12.9
13.2
15.1

13.9
12.4

>
}
/

>
}

0.93
0.98


0.92
1.12
 *                          4-1
  1 (in. of H-O-min-ft/lbfm]) = 10 sec
                                         19

-------

L 	 0.71 m (28 in.) 	 	
Clean
Air 	 	
Out
0.86 m
(34 in.)

Impactor
Mount #2
Impactor
Mount
0.64m
.(25 in.)




O


0
I 	


0




t 1
CM* ^
^^ C
_j 	 E
CM
CE
Faraday p,
cnr-
62


i
c
8
1
A

1- 	












2










,30 in. [5.8 cm]
—28 in. {71 cm




















Typical















I/




/•Corona Wires
' (1/16 in. [1.6mm]
Welding Rod)


A'
	 	 Grounding
Grid (3/8 in.
[9.5 mm]
Steel Tubing)




To
High Voltage #2
I

To
High Voltage #1
Figure  1.   Pulse jet  schematic.
                       (APF - APD c Q )A
Figure  2.   Plenum precharger.
                                                      Figure 3.   Pulse jet pres-
                                                                  sure trace  (DC
                                                                  mode).
             Precharger
             OFF
           Figure  4.
                                  Precharger ON
Pulse  jet filtra-
tion of Detroit
Edison flyash.
      10  20   30   40
                      50  60  70
                       Time Imin)
                                 80   90   100 110  120
                                        20

-------
                APPENDIX 1:  PREDICTED PRECHARGER PERFORMANCE

     A sketch of the duct precharger appears in Figure Al along with typical
current-voltage levels.  All corona current is assumed to flow through the
protruding short length, £, of welding rod.  For a typical experiment this
length was 5-in. (12.7 cm) and was mounted coaxially within a 3-in. (7.6 cm)
inside diameter duct.  Current flow through other sections of the structure,
such as the support mount to which the welding rod is attached, is ignored.

     To calculate the charging-time constant, T, of this precharger at typi-
cal power settings, an expression given by Oglesby and Nichols (1978, p.63)
is used:

                                    4e0   4e0                              ,.,.
                               T = ——£• = 	2.                              (Al)
                                   N0eb    a                                 '


where e0 = permitivity of free space = 8.85 x 10 12 (C2s2/kg-m3);

      No = charge carrier concentration;

       e = carrier charge;

       b = carrier mobility; and

       a = electrical conductivity.

     From the power supply current and voltage, the medium conductivity can be
estimated as:
                                   a = Y-                                  (A2)


where  J = I/duct wall area adjacent to corona wire = J/2-rr£r;

      Eo = V/r; and
     I,V = power supply current and voltage.

     Substituting the values from Figure Al in Equations (A2) and (Al) yields:


                                                         a)                (A3)
                        =  4(8.85 x
                             2.51 x  10
     The typical gas  flow rate  through  the  inlet duct is 125 acfm  (3.54 m3/
min).  This volume  flow  corresponds  to  a  linear flow rate of approximately 44
ft/sec (13 m/s) which implies that the  time required to pass by the 5-in. (12.7
cm) length of corona  wire is about 9.8  ms.   Using  the charging expression
from Oglesby and Nichols (1978),
                                                                           (A5)
                                      21

-------
where q(t) = particle  charge;

        q  = particle  saturation  charge;
         s
         t = charging  time;  and

         T = charging  time  constant;

and the estimated values of  t  (9.8 ms)  and T  (1.41 ms)  just calculated, Equa-
tion (A3) predicts a q(t)/q  ratio of  0.87,  implying that the flyash particles
should achieve 87% of  their  saturation charge when traversing the precharger
sketched in Figure Al.  Doubling  the volume flow through the inlet duct cuts
the charging time in half.   Thus, a total air-flow rate of 250 acfm (7.08 m3/
min) reduces charging  time  to  4.9 ms which,  by Equation (A5), implies that
particles will be charged to 78%  of their saturation values.

     The expression for saturation charge q ,  under field charging conditions,
is given by Oglesby and Nichols (1978,  p.63f  as:


                             qa =  12 —£— TT£oa2E0                          (A6)
                             S     K  I™ £.

where K = particle dielectric  constant;

      a = particle diameter; and

      all other symbols are  as before.

By dividing a flyash sample  into  increments  according to size as in an impactor
sampling, q  can be computed from Equation (A6)  for the mean diameter of each
increment.  Assigning  appropriate weightings  to  each increment,  the total
saturation charge of a given mass of sample  can  be estimated.

     Following this procedure  yielded  a saturation charge/mass estimate for
the Detroit Edison flyash of 57 /nC/g,  assuming that K/K+2 in Equation (A6) is
equal to 1.  At 87% charging efficiency,  the  estimate reduces to about 50 yC/
g.  As measured by the Faraday cage, values of Q/M have typically been 0.7-1.1
     with the precharger ON.   When the  precharger  is OFF, Q/M ~0.1
                                        	  e  	
                                         (~5in. [12.7cm])
                                                     T
                                Estimated Charging Efficiency 3- ~ 78%

                                at 250 act. ft3/min (7.1 m3/min)
                        Figure Al.  Duct precharger.

                                      22

-------
   ELECTRICALLY CHARGED FLYASH EXPERIMENTS IN A LABORATORY SHAKER BAGHOUSE

              By:  L.S. Hovis, J.H. Abbott
                   Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Research Triangle Park, N.C.  27711

                   R.P. Donovan, C.A. Pareja
                   Research Triangle Institute
                   P.O. Box 12194
                   Research Triangle Park, N.C.  27709

                                  ABSTRACT
     As has been demonstrated for numerous dust/fabric systems, increasing the
electrical charge of the dust particles dramatically reduces the KZ values of
the dust cake formed by such particles.  This demonstration has been repeated
in a room-temperature-operated shaker baghouse, using redispersed flyash from
both Southwestern Public Service and Detroit Edison with silicone-graphite
finished fiberglass bags.  The observed dependencies of this effect upon
operating time and relative humidity are presented.  Interpreting the results
in traditional K.2 terms requires corrections for flyash collection by the pre-
charger which is shown to vary with precharger cleaning techniques.

     Prolonged operation with a charged flyash gas stream at 50 percent rela-
tive humidity causes the low K£ values, characteristic of highly charged fly-
ash, to gradually increase to the range characteristic of uncharged flyash.
Increasing the operating relative humidity to 70 percent rapidly restores the
low K2 operation.  These observations are interpreted in terms of flyash elec-
trical resistivity and its role in the operation of the precharger of an
electrically enhanced dust filtration system.
                                    TEXT

     Increasing the magnitude of the electrical charge on a dust sample
improves its filtration properties by increasing its collectability (increas-
ing the efficiency of the filter collecting it) and lowering its specific cake
resistance, as has now been shown by many researchers (Chudleigh and Bainbridge,
1980; Ariman and Helfritch, 1980; and linoya and Mori, 1980).  Commercial
apparatus seeking to capitalize on this improved performance now exists
(Helfritch, 1977 and 1979) even though the basic mechanisms producing this
type of electrically enhanced performance are not well understood.  The goal
of the experiments to be reported here is to develop fabric filter performance
models that include electrical charge as a parameter and permit the prediction
of electrically enhanced performance.  This goal is ambitious since only under
severely restricted conditions can fabric filtration performance be predicted
for the non-electrically enhanced case.  Nonetheless this paper describes the
initial EPA experiments toward that goal.
                                      23

-------
Apparatus

     All experiments were performed in the one-bag shaker baghouse described
by Durham and Harrington (1971).  This system operates at room temperature
and uses redispersed dusts of various types as a test material for bag perfor-
mance measurements.  Several modifications are worth noting, however.  The
variable speed dust feeder is now enclosed in a separate feed house, the
humidity of which is controlled by an Inreco® humidifier.  Thus, the entire
hopper and its dust load are stored at the desired humidity.  The flyash-laden
stream passed to the baghouse draws its makeup air from this same humidity-
controlled chamber,

     A corona charging section has also been added to the top entry of the
baghouse as illustrated in Figure 1.  The high-voltage electrode consists of a
steel tube positioned along the centerline of a section of the entry pipe.
The steel tube is electrically isolated by Teflon® standoffs through which the
high voltage power line is routed.  On the downstream end of the tube, an
adjustable length of 1/16 in. (1.6 mm) welding rod protrudes.  Its dimensions
control the corona discharge.  The distance between the end of the corona wire
and the top of the bag varies between 14 and 18 in. (36 and 46 cm) .

     A 1/4-in. (6 mm) line for drawing a sample through a Faraday cage is
located immediately downstream of the corona wire.  In the absence of flyash
feed, no significant current is detected by the Faraday cage even when opera-
ting above the maximum corona power used in any of the experiments.

     With typical flyash concentration in the inlet (~3 gr/ft3 [6.9 g/m3]),
the charge/mass (Q/M) of the flyash increases by approximately one order of
magnitude (to 2 to 5 jnC/g) when the corona power is 15-20 kV, 0.1 to 0.2 mA.
This operation constitutes the "charged" flyash condition used as a variable
in the performance experiments.  Charger-OFF (no high voltage to the corona
wire) typically means the flyash Q/M is 0.2 to 0.5 yC/g, although excursions
from this range occur periodically.  The sign of the flyash charge with the
corona ON is always negative, corresponding to the power supply polarity.
Charger-OFF operation sometimes results in positive flyash charge but is not
predictable.

     Two types of flyash are used in these experiments:  from the hopper of an
electrostatic precipitator (ESP) at Detroit Edison and from the hopper of a
baghouse at Harrington Station No. 2 Boiler (Southwestern Public Service).
The Detroit Edison flyash (DBF) was further classifed by passing it through a
laboratory ESP.  Once loaded into the baghouse-feed hopper, it is dispersed
into the dirty air stream, collected by the bag, dumped into the baghouse hop-
per, and eventually returned manually to the feed hopper from which the cycle
is repeated.  The size distribution of this DEF, after several months of such
cycling, is shown in Figure 2.  (These plots were actually made in the labora-
tory pulse-jet baghouse, which used the same flyash, and in the same recycling
mode.  The pulse jet permits an impactor to be inserted into the baghouse so
that sampling losses are confined to the impactor inlet alone.)

     No impactor analyses have been made on the Southwestern Public Service
(SPS) flyash since it has been used only in the shaker baghouse.  This flyash

                                     24

-------
is the same as that described by Ladd, et al.  (1980)  and Lipscomb, et al.
(1980).                                                            	

     The filter bags used in all tests reported here  were  silicone-graphite
finished fiberglass, W.W. Criswell  Style 445-04.   These bags are similar to
those installed initially at Harrington No.  2.  Their properties and perfor-
mance in the Harrington baghouse were discussed by Ladd, et al. (1980);
Lipscomb, et al.  (1980) evaluated this fabric, along  with  other fabrics in the
EPA mobile baghouse operating on a  slipstream  from Harrington No. 1.  Unused
bag samples prepared for these  latter tests  were  furnished to the EPA in-house
facility by Lipscomb.  These bags were cut and shaped to fit the shaker bag-
house, resulting  in a bag area  of approximately 7.4 ft2 (0.69 m2) .  The bags
were mounted with their texturized  surface facing the flyash stream.

     The shaker baghouse has a  top  entry through  which the dirty-air stream
from the feedhouse is pulled.   A long 1-in.  (2.5  cm)  diameter hose connects
the feedhouse to  the top of the baghouse.  At  the top of the baghouse the gas
stream passes through a flow straightener element shaped like a witch's hat,
traverses the corona precharger section, and then enters the top of the verti-
cally hung bag.   A sealed hopper beneath the bottom of the bag catches all
dust during filtration and cleaning.  In-situ  measurements show essentially
no dust collection by the hopper during filtration—the hopper fallout in this
configuration is  essentially zero.  For shake-cleaning, the bottom of the bag
is attached to a  tapered outlet section which  is  coupled by a flexible joint
to the hopper entry pipe.  The  tapered section is oscillated by an eccentri-
cally driven rod  at 4 cycles/sec.   The amplitude  of the rod displacement from
its center position is about 7/8-in.  (2.2 cm).

     The typical  cleaning cycle used  in most of the experiments reported here
consists of a 1-min pause after the end of the filtration  cycle, a 2-min shake-
clean as described above, and finally a 1-min  pause before the beginning of
the next filtration cycle.  For some  data the  shake-clean  portion of the cycle
was shortened to  either 60 or 30 sees, primarily  to minimize bag wear under
special test conditions.  This  modification  is assumed not to alter the clean-
ing significantly, based on beta backscattering measurements of SPS flyash
removal during cleaning (Gardner, et  al., 1981).   These removal measurements
suggest that virtually all flyash that is removed during the overall cleaning
cycle is removed  during the first 20  sees of the  shake-clean, a conclusion
similar to that reached earlier by  Walsh and Spaite  (1962) and by Dennis and
Wilder (1975) although these researchers used  different experimental tech-
niques.

     In the typical routine operation, pressure drop  across both the bag and
a venturi neck  (to measure flow) is monitored  continuously.  In addition,
special sensors have been incorporated for certain experiments.  Among these
sensors have been the previously mentioned beta gauge (Gardner, et al., 1981),
an in-situ load cell for weighing the hopper dust, and various electrodes for
measuring charge  accumulation in or on the bag (Donovan, et al., 1980).  These
outputs will not  be discussed further in this  paper.

     Periodic sampling of the inlet and outlet dust  streams is also routine  in
the operation of  the laboratory baghouse.  The quantity of dust fed into the

                                      25

-------
baghouse by the Acrison screw feeder is sampled daily.  This feed rate is
usually very stable so long as the hopper is above 10 percent capacity.  The
outlet dust concentration is also monitored during several filtration cycles
per day by isokinetically drawing a sample from the outlet line and collecting
it on a filter for weighing.  Typically this outlet sampling takes place only
during the forward filtration flow and extends over only one such cycle, but
in any event is of at least 20-min duration.

     Inlet dust Q/M is also sampled periodically, typically daily, through a
port just downstream from the corona wire (Figure 1).   This measurement con-
sists of collecting a sample on a filter that is electrically isolated from
ground.  During sampling the charge accumulation on the filter is measured by
a Keithley electrometer (in the charge measurement mode).   The dust mass is
determined by a post-sampling weighing and both a Q/M and a space-charge
density (Q/volume of gas passed through the filter) are calculated.  The total
mass collected by the filter is reduced when the precharger is ON.  The Q/M
reported is that of the mass that is collected and the charge it carried with
no correction attempted for any sampling bias that might be introduced by the
charge.

     Precharger operation was at predetermined values  of either current or
voltage.  The corresponding power levels were recorded at the beginning of the
experiments and monitored periodically through the runs but no continuous
record of these levels was made.

Results

     A test series was conducted with each of the two  test flyashes.   The SPS
flyash series was conducted first and consisted of three separate sequential
runs, each starting with a new bag which was operated  around the clock over a
time period of 2-3 weeks.   One run with DBF then followed, again beginning
with a fresh, unused fiberglass bag.

     The test plan consisted of comparing performance, chiefly pressure drop,
between precharger-ON and precharger-OFF operation.  Implementation consisted
of operating the baghouse at fixed conditions until an equilibrium was
achieved, then switching the precharger to the opposite state and re-establish-
ing equilibrium.  Performance comparisons were then made between the two
equilibrium states.

     One question addressed immediately was the significance of the charge
state of the initial flyash collected by the virgin fabric.  The break-in
period of a fabric is critical and under some conditions interactions occurring
then can influence fabric performance far beyond this  period of initial use
(Davis, 1980).   Specifically the desire to confirm that performance differences
measured by the switching procedure outlined in the previous paragraph did not
depend on break-in led to a comparison of two bag break-in histories—one
broken in with the precharger OFF (Bag 1) and the second broken in with the
precharger ON (Bag 2).

     Each of these bags operated with a fixed 80-min filtration cycle followed
by the cleaning cycle of 1-min pause, 2-min shake, and 1-min pause.  Typical

                                     26

-------
AP traces during these cycles appear  in Figure  3,  one  showing precharger ON;
the other, precharger OFF.

     The persistent observation  of  all the  experiments, regardless of dust type,
is contained in Figure 3— turning ON  the  precharger  significantly reduces the
rate at which Ap increases with  time.  This conclusion holds for bags broken
in with the precharger ON as well as  for  those  broken  in with the precharger
OFF.  Indeed the status of the precharger during break- in appears to be unim-
portant to the laboratory observations, as  shown in  Figure 4.  The same general
shaded bands of K'2 and Ap^ (Figure  4) apply to  both  bags; hence the conclusion
that ordering sequence is relatively  unimportant for determining AP  and K^ .

     In Figures 5 and 6 similar  data  are  shown  for the DBF.  Here, only one
bag was evaluated and the filtration  period was extended to 180 minutes because
of the lower values of K£ and Ap   As in Figures  3  and 4 the influence of
turning ON the precharger is evident  in this flyash  system as well, although
the KZ values of the DBF are lower  than those of the SPS flyash (indeed the
precharger OFF values for DEF are about the same as  those measured for the SPS
flyash with the precharger ON) .

     Other researchers have attempted to  interpret the reduced K2 values of
charged dust in terms of an increased dust-cake porosity (Cooper, 1979).  While
this effect may contribute to the flyash  observations  reported here, other
factors prove to be more important.   The  Kjj data presented in Figures 4 and 6
have been calculated from the following expression:

                                     (AP -AP )
where AP  =  the  pressure drop across  the  bag  at  the end of the filtration
             cycle;
      AP  =  the  effective pressure drop at  the beginning of the filtration
             cycle (the intersection of the  linear portion of the AP trace with
             the  t = 0 axis) ;
        C. =  dust concentration in the inlet;

        V =  the  superficial  filtration velocity  (the  gas-to-cloth ratio); and

        t  =  the  time of a filtration  cycle.

In  Equation  1, the factor C.VtF represents  the mass/area of the dust cake
producing the  change in pressure drop across  the bag.  Using Equation 1 is
therefore equivalent to assuming that all dust fed into the baghouse ends up
evenly  distributed on the fabric.  In particular the  use of Equation 1 in
conjunction  with precharger-ON data is suspect,  since flyash collected by the
precharger section is not adequately  accounted for.   Rewriting Equation 1 as:
                                        F
                                                                            (2)
                                      27

-------
where  A = the total fabric area;  and
      m  = the total dust mass added to the fabric during the filtration cycle;

makes clear the fact that a change in the flyash ending up on the bag from that
assumed by setting HL, = C Vt A changes the computed value of K£ .   Failure to
include such corrections leads to  Ka errors.   No such corrections have been
made in the data presented in Figures 4 and 6.

     To use Equation 2, which requires a measurement of mT> the experimental
procedure was changed to include a hopper weighing after selected shake-clean-
ings.  In addition, in certain experiments, the precharger section above the
bag was cleaned by manual rapping  after the bag itself had been cleaned by the
conventional mechanism.  A crude mass balance could be carried out by dividing
the incoming flyash into four possible destinations:

     1.   the hopper,
     2.   the outlet duct,
     3.   the bag, and
     4.   the precharger.

     As mentioned previously, the  hopper fallout proved negligible in this top-
entry system.  The flyash penetrating the bag to reach the outlet duct was
assumed to be less than 1 percent  and hence also negligible.  The conclusion
is that the two flyash weighings—that of the flyash shaken from the bag during
the shake-clean portion of the cycle and that dislodged from the precharger
section during manual rapping—should account for most of the flyash entering
the baghouse during a given cycle.

     Table 1 summarizes the results of such measurements carried out with the
DBF.  All measurements were made after a fixed 3-hour filtration cycle in
which approximately 1170 g of flyash entered the baghouse.  The amount of fly-
ash ending up on the bag decreased with precharger voltage as shown.  Using
the actual mass of flyash collected on the bag as m  in Equation 2 results in
the corrected Kj values shown while using Equation I yields the uncorrected Ka
values.  These data show that when the precharger is cleaned each cycle, the
reduced K^ values portrayed in Figures 4 and 6 are attributable primarily to
flyash collection by the precharger.

     When, however, the precharger section is not cleaned and the collected
flyash is allowed to accumulate, a steady state is reached in which the flyash
leaving the precharger is nearly the same as the quantity entering.  As shown
in Table lb, under operation tfith no precharger rapping, 90 percent-of the fly-
ash mass fed into the baghouse ends up on the bag.  Corrected K^ values calcu-
lated from Equation 2 now show a decrease when the precharger is ON.  This mode
of operation is that in which the  data of Figures 4 and 6 were collected.

     The conclusions emerging from these corrected K.2 measurements therefore
are that with a regularly cleaned  precharger, the dominant mechanism of reduced
bag Ap is flyash capture by the precharger.  Without regular precharger clean-
ing, however, the reduced AP is still observed but cannot be attributed to
precharger collection.  A true dust-cake effect is one possible explanation,
but precharger efficiency and performance must be monitored more carefully

                                      28

-------
before conclusive statements can be made.

     Certain instabilities were noted under  the no-clean mode of operation with
Bag 3, the third  bag run with the DEF.  Bag 3 operated in a constant AP  mode—
the shake-cleaning portion of the cycle was  initiated when the AP acrossFthe
bag reached 6.6 in. of H20 (1.6 kPa) .  Filtration time becomes a variable in
this operating mode rather than a fixed value as it was for the cycles sketched
in Figures 3 and 5.  Long-term operating stability in this mode was monitored
by running the bag around the clock over a period of several weeks, the only
interruptions being for insertion and removal of efficiency measuring probes.
Precharger power was ON throughout and the precharger section was left unrapped.

     As evident in Figure 7, the charge-enhanced operation had essentially
disappeared by Day 8; that is, the early filtration time period was on the
order of 170 minutes (Day 2) while the Day 8 filtration time decreased to 70-
80 minutes.  The corresponding Kj values are equivalent to those of the corona-
ON band (Figure 4) for the Day 2 operation and the corona-OFF band for the Day
8 operation, even though the corona power has actually been ON  throughout.

     That this deterioration in performance  is caused by precharger inefficiency
is suggested by the subsequent Day 12 observation (not shown) in which the
longer filtration time (lower Kj) operation  is restored by operating at 70 per-
cent relative humidity.  This dependence on  relative humidity is interpreted as
a flyash-resistivity effect, the added mositure serving as a "conditioning"
agent which lowers the electrical resistivity of the flyash and restores the
charging efficiency of the precharger.

Conclusions

1.   When the precharger section is cleaned  by manual rapping during each
     cycle, the dominant mechanism of the charge-enhanced performance is dust
     removal by the precharger so that the system should be modeled as a
     serial combination of a precharger ESP  and a conventional fabric filter.
     This conclusion does not reject previous reports of K^ reduction with
     increasing electrical charge as will be discussed in the following para-
     graph; it does imply that the contribution of any such true K2 reduction
     is less than that attributable to the mass removal effect—at least for
     the experiments carried out in the EPA  shaker baghouse with regular pre-
     charger cleaning.
2.   If the precharger section is not cleaned, a significant enhancement con-
     tinues to occur.  Under these conditions, a steady state is reached between
     the dust entering the precharger and the dust leaving the precharger.  The
     dust reaching the bag during any given  filtration cycle then is approxi-
     mately equal to that fed into the system so that the precharger collection
     efficiency is effectively zero.  Under  these conditions, enhanced filtra-
     tion still occurs as is apparent by the mass-corrected values of K^.  This
     mode of operation appears to be unstable as was illustrated by the loss
     of enhancement under long-term operation (~8 days) at 50 percent relative
     humidity.  That the enhancement could be re-established by raising the
     relative humidity to 70 percent suggests a flyash-electrical resistivity
     effect whereby the precharger operation has been restored by the use of a
     more conductive flyash.
                                      29

-------
     In short, stable precharger operation is essential for stable enhanced
filtration via charged flyash.  Optimum precharger design is still under
development.  Whatever design is chosen, it will have to be operated and main-
tained along with the bags in order to realize and maintain enhanced filtra-
tion.  The incorporation of a precharger upstream of a fabric filter therefore
adds its own maintenance requirements to those of the baghouse.   Although what
constitutes either optimum or adequate precharger operation is not yet defined,
the precharger probably will have modest performance requirements compared to
those of a conventional electrostatic precipitator, and appears to possess the
potential for improving overall baghouse performance whether as a pre-collector
or a method of modifying dust-cake porosity or a combination of both.

Metric Conversions

1 in. of H20 = 0.25 kPa; 1 gr/ft3 = 2.29 g/m3; 1 (in. of H20/f t/min)/lb/f t2 =
           "
References

Ariman, T. and D.J. Helfritch, "Pressure Drop in Electrostatic Fabric Filtra-
     tion," Second Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization of Particulate
     Control Technology, Vol. Ill,  EPA-600/9-80-039c (NTIS PB 81-144800),
     September 1980, pp. 222-236.

Chudleigh, P.W. and N.W. Bainbridge, "Electrostatic Effects in Fabric Filters
     During Build-up of the Dust Cake," Filtration and Separation,  July/ August
     1980, pp. 309-311.

Cooper, D.W., "Mechanisms for Electrostatic Enhancement of Filter Performance,"
     Invited paper presented to The Fiber Society and the Filtration Society
     Joint Symposium on Fibers, Electrostatics and Filtration, Princeton,  N.J.,
     November 14-15, 1979.

Davis, W.T. and W.F. Frazier, "Conditioning of Fiberglass Fabric Filters for
     Improved Performance," TVA Report, October 1980, Department of Civil
     Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee  37916.

Dennis, R. and J. Wilder, "Fabric Filter Cleaning Studies," EPA-650/ 2-75-009
     (NTIS PB 240372), January 1975.

Donovan, R.P., J.H. Turner, and J.H. Abbott, "Passive Electrostatic Effects in
     Fabric Filtration," in Second Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization
     of Particulate Control Technology, Vol. I, EPA-600/9-80-039a (NTIS PB 81-
     122202), September 1980, pp. 476-493.

Durham, J.F. and R.E. Harrington, "Influence of Relative Humidity on Filtra-
     tion Resistance and Efficiency of Fabric Dust Filters," Filtration and
     Separation, July /August 1971,  pp. 389-398.

Gardner, R.P., R.P. Donovan, and L.S. Hovis, "A Dual-Beam Backscatter Beta-
     Particle Gauge for Measuring the Filter Cake Thickness on Operating Bag
     Filters Independent of Position," presentation to the Third Symposium on

                                      30

-------
     the Transfer and Utilization  of  Particulate Control Technology,  March
     1981, Orlando, FL (this symposium).

Helfritch, D.J.,  "Performance of an Electrostatically Aided Fabric  Filter,"
     Chem. Eng.  Prog., _73, August  1977,  pp.54-57.

Helfritch, D.J.,  Apitron, Product  Brochure, 1979, Apitron Division, American
     Precision Industries, 12037 Goodrich Dr., Charlotte, NC   28217.

linoya, K. and Y. Mori, "Effects of a Corona Precharger and Relative  Humidity
     on Filter Performance," Second Symposium on theTransfer  and Utilization
     of Particulate Control Technology,  Vol. Ill, EPA-600/9-80-039c (NTIS PB
     81-144800),  September 1980, pp.237-250.

Ladd,  K.L.,  R. Chambers, S. Kunka, and D. Harmon, "Objectives  and Status of
     Fabric  Filter Performance  Study," Second Symposium on the Transfer and
     Utilization of Particulate Control Technology, Vol. I, EPA-600/9-80-039a
      (NTIS PB 81-122202), September 1980, pp.317-341.

Lipscomb, W.O., S.P. Schliesser, and  S.  Malane, "EPA Mobile Fabric  Filter—
     Pilot Investigation of Harrington Station Pressure Drop Difficulties,"
     Second  Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization of Particulate  Control
     Technology, Vol. I, EPA-600/9-80-039a (NTIS PB 81-122202),  September
     1980, pp.453-475.

Walsh, G.W.  and P.W. Spaite, "An Analysis of Mechanical Shaking  in  Air  Filtra-
      tion,"  J. Air Pollut. Control Assn., 12, No. 2, February  1962, pp.57-61.

             Table 1. Kj Values of Detroit Edison Flyash Corrected for Mass Loss to the
                    Precharger* (3-hr filtration at 3 gr/ft3 => 1170 g total feed).

           	a)  Precharger Cleaned Each Cycle bv Manual Rapping	
Precharger
  Voltage   Dust Q/M
   (kV)     (nC/g)
                                 Dust on Bag   Uncorrected Kj    Corrected Kj
                                    (g)      (from Equation 1) (from Equation 2)
0
10
12.5
15
17.5
20

Precharger
(kV
17.
17.
17.
17.
0
Kj in uni
_
1.5
1.9
3.1
3.5
-

Voltage
)
5
5
5
5

Fin.
tsof [_
1,152
999
615
615
413
443

5.4
4.8
3.7
3.0
2.5
1.7

Dust on Bag Uncorrected Kj
(g) (from Equation 1)
1,060
1,071
1,012
900
908
of H^O/ft/min]
lb/ff J
2.5
1.9
2.1
2.3
5.4

5.5
5.6
7.0
5.7
6.9
4.4

Corrected Kj
(from Equation 2)
2.7
2.1
2.5
3.0
6.1

                                        31

-------
                                                 HIGH VOLTAGE
                            TO FARADAY
                            CAGE
Figure 1.   Shaker baghouse  inlet modified to  accommodate  a corona wire.
                                    MASS CONC. (g/m3)
RUN *
PJ61A1
PJ61A2
PJ61B1
PJ61C1
PJ61D1
PJ61D2
PJ61 El
PJ61 F2
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
50% 0
50% 0
30% n
70% A
70% A
70% A
39%
50% n
MMD Ifiml
4.90
5.09
4.88
4.93
4.98
4.75
4.53
4.85
W/PROBE
2.63
2.31
2.73
2.61
2.89
2.79
2.70
2.24
W/O PROBE
2.31
2.02
2.27
2.20
2.29
2.24
2.20
1.88
SAMPLE
TIME (mini
7
7
6
4
3
3
3
3
                                                   j—.—i	1—i	I i  i i
                                                                       99.8
                                                                       99
                                                                       98
                                                                       95 Z
                                                                         I
                                                                         to
                                                                         w
                                                                         UJ
                                                                       70
                                                                       SO
                                                                       50 O
                                                                       20 P
                                                                         <
                                                                         _l
                                                                       10 S
                                                                         o
                                                                       5

                                                                       2
                                                                       1
                                                                       0.5
                                                                       0.2
                                                                       0.1
                        0.2   0.3 0.4   0.6 0.8 1.0      2.0   3.0 4.0   6.0 8.0 10.0
                                   PARTICLE SIZE (micrometers)
     Figure 2.   In-situ impactor  analyses of  Detroit Edison flyash.
                                         32

-------
          Laboratory Shaker Baghouse/Redispersed
          SPSFIyAsh 	

          Laboratory Shaker Baghouse/Corona Charged
          Redispersed SPS Fly Ash	
           c 4
                                 8084

                                TIME (min)
                                164
           Figure  3.
Reduced pressure drop of charged
Southwestern Public Service flyash.



1 J
_l


' 8

7
6
B
4

3


~1
8



<



'

7
6
5

4
3
x-
r
•
i ,
NEW

•






CORONA
*- OFF -».





-*
-



«
* X \
X.

BAG OF
1


,^

0


3tt
0 *







OFF


• 1

* •






X X X X





*

^


ON







*


XXX











OFF











x

BAG OPERATING TIME (DAYS)
I
30

20


10

L.

.


-
• • • •

5
BAG 2



•

1
10




•
•

.






yrtsT-r




\



ON
















i










I
15
















^







Figure 4.  Filtration performance of Southwestern Public  Service
           flyash/Criswell silicone-graphite fiberglass bag.
                                33

-------
Laboratory Shaker/Detroit Edison Fly Ash -
Laboratory Shaker/Corona Charged
    Detroit Edison Fly Ash	
             1          2
               TIME (hr)
                                          Figure  5.   Reduced pressure drop  of
                                                      charged Detroit Edison
                                                      flyash.
      -OFF-
        ///;//////
                  CORONA
                     ON
         i — i
                     i
              - "^T"—^
            //SSSMSSWWSSSSSS,/,,,,,,^
                                          Figure  6.   Specific cake  resistance of
                                                      Detroit Edison flyash.
                                       ,
         s  2  3  4  5  6   7   8   9  10 11
              OPERATING TIME (days)
   1 in.of H2O

         A   DAY 2.  CORONA ON
   1 in.of H2O
         B   DAY 8, CORONA ON
        Figure  7.   Degradation of  electrically enhanced filtration of
                    Southwestern Public Service flyash.
                                         34

-------
                ELECTROSTATIC AUGMENTATION  OF FABRIC FILTRATION

            By:  D. W. VanOsdell
                 Research Triangle Institute
                 P. 0. Box  12194
                 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27709

                 G. P. Greiner
                 ETS, Inc.
                 3140 Chaparral Drive, S. W. (Suite C-103)
                 Roanoke, Virginia   24018

                 G. E. R. Lamb
                 Textile Research Institute
                 P. 0. Box  625
                 Princeton, New Jersey  08540

                 L. S. Hovis
                 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                 MD-61
                 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711

                                   ABSTRACT

     The concept of electrostatic augmentation of fabric filtration (ESFF)
has been investigated at pilot scale.  The  pilot unit consisted of a con-
ventional baghouse in parallel with  an ESFF baghouse, allowing direct
comparison.  All results reported in this paper are for pulse-cleaned bags
in which the electric field was maintained  parallel to the fabric surface.
The performance of the ESFF baghouse has been superior to the parallel con-
ventional baghouse by several measures.  The ESFF baghouse demonstrated:
1) a reduced rate of pressure drop increase during a filtration cycle,
2) lower residual pressure  drop, 3)  stable  operation at higher face veloc-
ities, and 4) improved particle removal efficiency.  These benefits can be
obtained with only minor modifications to conventional pulse-jet hardware
and at low electrical power consumption.  The indicated ability to operate
at increased face velocities with only modest expenditure for electrical
hardware leads to very favorable economic projections.

                                 INTRODUCTION

Electrostatic Augmentation  of Fabric Filtration (ESFF)

     A number of researchers have proposed  and investigated various concepts
for the use of electrostatic forces  to improve fabric filtration.  The work
described in this paper used as a starting  point work done by the Textile
Research Institute (TRI).(l)  Briefly, the  TRI concept of ESFF consisted  of
the use of an electric field parallel to the fabric surface.  The field was
produced by raising alternate parallel wires to a high potential.  Corona
particle charging was not necessary.  The electrode wires were on the

                                     35

-------
dirty-gas side of the filter, in contact with, but not incorporated into, the
fabric. .It was found that fabric surface characteristics had a major effect
on the amount of enhancement possible.  A low fabric surface density appeared
to improve performance compared to a smooth, "cake release" fabric.

     Figure 1 is a schematic of the TRI "harness," which was developed over
the course of the TRI work and used at bench scale to evaluate the ESFF ef-
fect.  As shown, the harness was tied to the outside of the bag and elec-
trically connected so that alternate electrode wires were at high electrical
potential.  An important practical aspect of this design is that the cage
within the filter bag must be insulated to prevent electrical shorting
through the fabric.  In general, the TRI investigation was carried out at
ambient temperature with the bag operating at low pressure drops (about 0.25
kPa) .  The dust was a resuspended fly ash, with the bench pulse-jet unit
cleaned on a 15-minute cycle.

     The major advantages found for ESFF during the TRI investigation were a
reduced rate of pressure drop increase and reduced particle penetration.  A
pressure drop ratio (PDR) was defined as:

                                 CAP  - AP )
                                    j     r
                                      _
                                    f     r control

where AP is the pressure drop across the bags:  f refers to the final state
(just prior to cleaning), r refers to the residual state (just after clean-
ing), and control refers to a baghouse without electrical enhancement.

     For an idealized filter cycle in which the bag pressure drop increases
linearly with time at constant dust loading from AP  to APf, it can be shown
that:                                              r
                              PBK -                                     (2,
                                    (K2) control

where K.2 is the specific cake resistance.  PDR, then, is the ratio of the
flow resistance of a dust cake collected by an ESFF system to that of a con-
ventional fabric filter.

The Program

     A program to evaluate ESFF at pilot scale is being carried out by a
team consisting of the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) , ETS, Inc., and
TRI under contract to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  RTI, prime
contractor, has directed the technical effort and performed electrical hard-
ware development and construction.  ETS, Inc., designed, built, and is
operating the pilot unit.

     The pilot unit will be operated in both pulse-jet cleaning (outside
collection) and reverse-air cleaning (inside collection) modes.  The program
has been underway for about one and a half years.  Most of that time has

                                    36

-------
been spent in the pulse-jet operating mode;  thus,  all  of  the data  reported
in this paper are from pulse-jet  operation.   The principal parameters of  the
study have been pressure drop, mass  removal  efficiency, and removal effici-
ency by particle size.  In addition, an economic analysis of the ESFF con-
cept has been conducted.  The program is presently continuing with the
baghouses in the reverse-air operating  mode.

                              EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM

Pilot Baghouses

     The pilot plant which was designed and  built  to investigate ESFF con-
sists of two identical baghouses  operating in parallel from a flue gas slip-
stream.  One baghouse is electrostatically augmented,  while the other is
not.  Figure 2 is an isometric drawing  of the pilot unit.  Each baghouse  can
accept up to 13 pulse-cleaned, 11.4  cm  (4.5  in.) bags, each 244 cm (8 ft)
long.  Each pilot baghouse is about  85  cm (33 in.)  square and 4.3  m (14 ft)
high.  Construction is carbon steel  throughout.  Three inches of insulation
was used on both the baghouses and on all ductwork.  The  pilot units are
fairly typical of the smallest industrial unit with two exceptions:  1)
access doors were added on three  sides  of the baghouses,  and 2) center-to-
center bag spacing was increased  slightly to allow clearance for the elec-
trical hardware.

     We feel that the use of parallel control and  experimental units has
made the difference between success  and failure  for the ESFF program.  As is
described below, the dust source  has been highly variable, and it  would not
have been possible to speak with  confidence  about  the  experiment if we had
operated serially, even with much more  sophisticated instrumentation.  Bag-
house performance has been good.  Additional baghouse  insulation,  wall heat-
ers, and improved door seals were added during the checkout period to
correct a low temperature problem.   Otherwise, the baghouses performed as
designed.

     The pilot unit was installed on a  slipstream  from an industrial boiler
house.  Four pulverized coal boilers are in  use  with a normal load of about
160,000 kg/hr (350,000 Ib/hr) of  steam.   The coal  fed  to  the boilers changes
frequently, with sulfur content varying from less  than one percent to about
two percent and ash content ranging  from five to 15 percent.  The  boilers
are sometimes co-fired with oil.  Inlet dust loadings  at  the pilot plant
have varied from 0.6 to 5 g/scm  (0.25 to 2 gr/scf); 0.7 g/scm (0.3 gr/scf)
is typical.

High Voltage Electrical Hardware

     The electrical requirements  of  the ESFF system were  relatively low.
The power consumption measured by TRI (and since confirmed in the  pilot
unit) was about 1 W/m2 (~ 0.1 W/f t2) .   For comparison, energy requirements
for gas moving at 3 cm/sec (6 ft/min) and 0.25 kPa (1  in. H20) are about
10 W/m2 (~ 1 W/ft2).  At a potential difference  between electrodes of 10  kV,
one pilot unit bag required about 100 yA of  current.   The entire 13-bag
complement, under normal conditions, requires less than 1.3 mA at  10 kV.

                                     37

-------
The electrical system used at the pilot unit consisted of a variable DC
power supply  (0 to 20 kV at 5 mA) for each of five power supply net-
works.  Voltage was the controlled variable.  Current and primary voltage
were measured separately in each network.  Current limiting and meter pro-
tection circuits were also used.  The pilot unit was operated with no more
than five bags and, consequently, only one bag on each network.

     As described earlier, the TRI electrode "harness" consists of an array
of small diameter vertical wires glued to horizontal yarns.  The entire as-
sembly was tied to the outside of the bag.  Several problems were inherent
in this design.  The "harness" had the potential of restricting bag clean-
ing, was relatively fragile and difficult to install, presented materials
problems in the high temperature flue gas environment, and required an in-
sulated cage.  In spite of these anticipated difficulties, harnesses were
constructed for the pilot unit and were used to collect a significant por-
tion of the data which is presented in this report.  From the standpoint of
operating a research pilot plant, the failures of the insulating coating on
the cages and of the harness adhesive were the most significant problems.
The materials used deteriorated within one to two months and required fre-
quent attention.

     The problems discussed above were largely overcome with the design and
construction of a new electrode assembly.  The electrodes were moved to the
clean side of the bag and performed the dual function of cage and electrodes
(Figure 3).  Early laboratory data taken by TRI indicated that performance
with this electrode arrangement would be reduced from that possible with the
outside harness.  Pilot plant results for the two designs have been essen-
tially identical, however.  The inside electrodes have now been used
successfully for several months.

                             PILOT UNIT OPERATION

Pilot Unit Checkout/Bag Conditioning

     The initial portion of the pilot unit test program was intended to
demonstrate the crucial point that the two baghouses really were parallel
units with identical inlets.  To accomplish this, both houses were operated
as standard fabric filters.  After collecting enough data to be confident
that the two baghouses were comparable, the test bags were installed.  Four
bags were installed in each baghouse; the 'electrical harnesses were installed
on the bags in the ESFF baghouse.  The bags were broken in at a face velocity
of 1 cm/sec.  Following the conditioning phase, the face velocity was raised
to 3 cm/sec and the test program was initiated.

Test Program

     Normal operating procedure was to conduct the test program during the
day and to leave the baghouses on automatic operation overnight and on week-
ends.  Several cleaning cycles were used during the test program; the face
velocity was varied between 1 and 5 cm/sec.  Operation was evaluated at
field strengths between 0 and 5 kV/cm.  Both the TRI harness and the clean-
side cage/electrode described earlier were used to produce the electric

                                     30

-------
field.  Three fabrics were tested:   1)  23 oz Teflon® felt, mechanically
napped to reduce the surface density; 2)  17 02 Teflon® felt, an experimental
fabric; and 3) 17 oz woven glass fabric,  ten percent Teflon® B finish, bulked
in the fill yarn.

                           RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS

Ob servations

     Visually, the dust cake was somewhat thinner near the electrodes; this
was true for both outside and inside electrodes.  The outside harness con-
tinued to function even with a dust  cake  several times the electrode diameter
on the bag.  Cleaning of the bottom  half  of the bag was restricted by the
harness, however.  We were not able  to resolve whether a very thick dust cake
would reduce the ESFF effect, although some data indicated reduced perfor-
mance after several hours without cleaning.

     Normal, "good" operation of the ESFF baghouse required a current of
only 1 to 10 yA at 8 to 10 kV on the electrodes.  Variation in dust loading
and normal boiler variations did not adversely affect operation.  High dust
loadings, for instance, caused high  pressure drops or more frequent cleaning
for the baghouses, but the ESFF baghouse  retained its advantage.  Dust char-
acteristics do affect ESFF operation, however.  Operation below the acid dew
point was not possible because of high dust conductivity.  In addition,
short periods of high bag current (and reduced ESFF effect) due to dust
properties have occurred two or three times.  The ESFF baghouse recovered
after cleaning.  The cause of these  upsets has not been determined, but soot
and/or excessive carbon in the ash is suspected.

Rate of Pressure Drop Increase

     The most obvious of the effects of ESFF is that of a reduced rate of
pressure drop increase for a given dust loading rate.  This is the effect
which has been reported extensively  by TRI.  Figure 4 presents data from
one cleaning cycle for the pilot baghouses.  There is an evident difference
in the rate of pressure drop increase.  Expressed as PDR, the difference is
even greater.  The pressure drop in  the control baghouse is not linear ini-
tially but becomes so after the cake has  formed.  The ESFF trace does not
exhibit a cake repair period.  Other data do show a cake repair period for
the ESFF baghouses, although it is generally not as pronounced as that for
the conventional baghouse.

     Figure 5 is a presentation of PDR data as a function of average elec-
tric field.  Teflon® felt and fiberglass bag data are included.  A curve
representing the performance of the  TRI bench-scale baghouse is also pre-
sented.  For the Teflon® felt bags,  the pilot unit data are very similar to
the TRI data in spite of markedly different operating conditions.  The fiber-
glass bags, which do not have the low density surface characteristic of the
Teflon® bags, do not exhibit as great an  ESFF effect.  It is worth noting
that inlet mass loadings and hopper  dust weights have remained about the
same for both baghouses.

                                     39

-------
Residual Pressure Drop

     The data presented in Figure 4 exhibit another of the ESFF effects, a
lower residual pressure drop.  The residual pressure drop of the ESFF unit
was 20 to 80 percent of that of the conventional baghouse operated under
identical conditions.  It was possible through multiple off-line cleaning to
return both baghouses to essentially the same residual pressure drop, but
the residual pressure drop difference soon returned once normal operation
was resumed.

Stability at Increased Face Velocity

     The pilot unit has shown that the ESFF baghouse can be operated without
blinding at a higher face velocity than can a conventional baghouse.  Fig-
ure 6 presents some data which clearly show the improved performance possible
with the ESFF baghouse.  At 4 cm/sec, the conventional baghouse pressure drop
became too high for the pilot unit blower, and the gas rate was actually
dropping off at the high pressure drop.  Mass collection efficiency decreased
at high face velocities, as expected.

Particle. Collection Efficiency

     The pilot unit data indicate an increase in size dependent particle
collection efficiency with the ESFF baghouse.  Figure 7 is a plot of frac-
tional penetration as determined by multiple cascade impactor tests.  The
ESFF baghouse shows consistently better collection efficiencies over the
range 0.4 to 4.0 ym during the test period.  However, penetrations are also
influenced by more frequent cleaning of the conventional baghouse, so the
improvement may not be because of improved collection as much as reduced
losses through the cloth.  Mass efficiency data have not shown a clear ad-
vantage for the ESFF baghouse.

Economics

     The capability to operate at an increased face velocity for a particu-
lar dust gives the ESFF concept a large cost advantage over conventional
fabric filtration.  Compared to a conventional baghouse operating at
2 cm/sec (4 ft/min), an ESFF baghouse operating at 3 cm/sec (6 ft/min) might
be expected to control the same emission problem for a 30 percent lower
total annual cost.  It may be possible to operate at 4 cm/sec (8 ft/min) as
shown in Figure 6 at even lower cost.

                                  CONCLUSIONS

     ESFF as developed in the laboratory has been transferred successfully
to a pilot unit on coal-fired boiler flue gas.  The ESFF baghouse can be op-
erated at increased face velocities compared to a conventional baghouse on
the same flue gas.  Other manifestations of the effect of the electric field
on the dust collection are a reduced rate of pressure drop and a reduced
residual pressure drop for an ESFF baghouse operated at the same face veloc-
ity as a conventional baghouse.  In addition, at constant face velocity, par-
ticulate control is improved by the use of ESFF.

                                     40

-------
                                RECOMMENDATIONS

Pulse-Jet Baghouse

     Although the initial pilot plant experience has been very positive and
may be commercially viable, additional development work is required.  Scale-
up has not yet been investigated, nor truly long-term operation, and
additional engineering effort is sure to be required in these areas.  In
addition, work is needed in the areas of cage insulators and the entire
electrical system to reduce operator involvement and improve reliability.
The use of different fabrics and application to other dust control problems
are also subjects that should be investigated.

Reverse-Air Baghouse

     The use of ESFF in reverse-air baghouses has not been tested at pilot
scale.  Bench work at TRI has been somewhat successful.  The woven glass
fabrics normally used do not have favorable surface characteristics, al-
though they do exhibit an ESFF effect.  In addition, the clean-side
electrode/cage which was very desirable for the pulse-jet unit may not be
best for the reverse-air system.  The indicated need, then, is for develop-
ment of fabric/electrode combinations that are optimal for ESFF.  We will
be working on this matter during the continuation of the pilot unit program.

                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This work was supported by Contract No. 68-02-3186 from the EPA
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina.  The assistance provided by E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company,
Inc., is gratefully acknowledged.  The pilot unit was located at their
Waynesboro, Virginia, plant and Teflon® fabric was donated to the test
program by DuPont.

                                   ENDNOTES

1.  Lamb, G. E. R., and P. A. Costanza.  A Low-Energy Electrified Filter
    System.  Filtration and Separation.  17:319, 1980.
                                      41

-------
                                     TO POWER SUPPLY
                        FIBERGLASS YARN-
                       -ELECTRODES	
                       STAINLESS STEEL
                       WIRE-0.58 mm
                                         O)
            Hh
            1.5 cm
HIGH VOLTAGE HARNESS            HARNESS INSTALLED ON BAG
    Figure  1.  TRI high voltage harness.
           Figure 2.  ESFF pilot unit.
                            42

-------
              FILTER
              BAG
                     SUPPORT
                     ROD/ELECTRODE

                        INSULATING
                        RING
          ALTERNATE ELECTRODES
          CONNECTED ELECTRICALLY
, FILTER
 BAG
      Figure  3.   Inside electrodes-cage  assembly.
O  0.75
£  0.50
   0.25
                               ESFF Baghouse
                               Face velocity: 3 cm/sec
                               Field:     4 kV/cm
                           30
                        TIME, minutes
Figure 4.   Bag pressure drop performance-single cycle,
                            43

-------
          5 0.6
            0.0
                                                         TEFLON® FABRIC   @

                                                         GLASS FABRIC
                                    23
                                       ELECTRIC FIELD (kV/cm)
           Figure  5.   Pilot  plant PDR  data.
     £
       2-0
     a
     LLJ
     CC
        1.0
                                                [off-scale]
CONVENTIONAL


           2.5 cm/sec (5 ft/min)
                                                       ESFF
                                                                4 cm/sec (8 ft/min)
                    _l	1_
                                                    J_
                          34     5     67    89

                                 TIME FROM START OF TEST (hours)
          Note:  Each test period preceded by
                multiple-pulse bag cleaning
Figure 6.   Pilot  unit performance  at  two  face velocities.
                                                                               J	I
                                                               10    11    12    13   14
               02    0.3   0.4  0.5 0.6  0.8 1.0
                                               2.0    3.0   4.0  5.0 6.0  8.0 10."
                                   Aerodynamic Particle Diameter, taa
       Figure 7.   Size  dependent  particle penetration.
                                           44

-------
                 FABRIC WEAR STUDIES AT HARRINGTON STATION

          By:   Richard Chambers, Kenneth Ladd, and Sherry Kunka
                    Southwestern Puhlic Service Company
                              P. 0. Box 1261
                          Amarillo, Texas  79170

                                Dale Harmon
               Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                      Environmental Protection Agency
               Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711


                               ABSTRACT

     The performance  and  service life of filtration fabrics in the utility
industry  is  a  subject of  interest to many  fabric filter  users.   South-
western Public  Service Company  (SPS),  among  several  other utilities,  has
developed a fabric  evaluation program in conjunction with an Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) study being done at SPS's Harrington Station.  This
paper will  discuss SPS's  experience with fabrics and some  of the conclu-
sions that have been drawn.
     Among the topics addressed will be:
     1.   The  use  of  systematic  physical  testing  on fabrics  to  monitor
          fabric wear and eventually predict fabric life.
     2.   An  analysis  of fabric  wear  mechanisms  at Harrington  Station.
     3.   Fabric failures by compartment position.
     4.   Controlling fabric wear by reducing shaker amplitude.

                             INTRODUCTION

     Fabric filtration  used in association with coal-fired utility boilers
remains a  relatively new air quality control technique.   One of  the most
critical aspects of a successful fabric filter application is proper fabric
selection.  To  date,  however, conclusive fabric  performance data  has been
unavailable to  those involved  in fabric selection  for  baghouse installa-
tions .  Performance trends  for  a variety of  fabrics  are  now beginning to
emerge  from a  study being conducted by Southwestern Public Service Company
(SPS) for the United States Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA).
     SPS  is  an  electric  utility based  in  Amarillo, Texas.   The  Company
provides  electricity to  a  117,000-square  kilometer  (45,000-square mile)
service area.  Traditionally a gas-fired utility, SPS began its switch to
coal-fired generation  in  1976 when Harrington Station Unit 1 was  put into
service.   Harrington Station  is  located approximately  8.1  km (5 miles)
north of Amarillo.   The facility consists of  three  360  MW units.   Unit 2,
in  1978,  was  the first new electric utility boiler to be equipped with a
fabric filter system for  emission control.  The boiler utilizes pulverized,
low sulfur Western  coal to produce 1,220,000 kg  (2,688,000  Ib)  steam/hour.
Flue gas  from  the boiler flows  through  the  preheater directly  through the
fabric filter system and  then out the stack.
     The  fabric  filter system  (or baghouse)  is  a Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc.
(WFI)  structural baghouse with  shake/deflate  cleaning.   It consists of 28
compartments with 204 bags per  compartment for a total of 5,712 bags; each
                                     45

-------
bag  is  0.3 m  (11.5  in.) in diameter  and  9.3 m (30 ft,  6  in.)  long.  The
baghouse was  specified  at  2,800,000 m /h (1,650,000 acfm) of  flue gas at
156°C  (313°F),  thus  yielding  a  design  air-to-cloth  ratio  of 3.17  to 1
(gross)  or 3.4 to  1  (net).  Harrington's  Unit 3  is  equipped with a WI
fabric filter which  also employs shake/deflate cleaning.   The  Unit 3 bag-
house, however, has  four more compartments which yield air-to-cloth ratios
of 2.78 to 1 (gross) and 2.98 to 1 (net).

Fabric Testing Results

     Immediately  following  the rebagging  of the Harrington  Unit  2 fabric
filter system,  a  fabric evaluation program was initiated for the  new fab-
rics.  The purpose of this program was to evaluate the wear characteristics
and  through-put for each of  the  fabrics under test in  the unit.   Table I
shows the  fabrics being  evaluated.
                          TABLE I.  Test Fabrics
Criswell 442-57DC2
Criswell 449-57DC2
Criswell 449-1580

Criswell 449 COF
Menardi Southern 601-T
Globe-Albany
 Allspun Nomex
0.34 kg/nu
0.48 kg/nu
0.48 kg/m
0.34 kg/ml
0.34 kg/rn
(10 oz/ydb
(14 oz/yd,)
(14 oz/yd )
(10 oz/yd*)
(10 oz/yd )
0.19 kg/m
                              10% Teflon coating
                              10% Teflon coating
                              Silicone/graphite/
                              Teflon coating
                              Proprietary coating
                              10% Teflon coating
          2
(5.5 oz/yd )    Permaguard coating
     In order to examine the various fabrics for wear, samples were removed
from each of the test compartments on a periodic basis and sent to Environ-
mental Consultants, Inc., for evaluation.  Each sample was subjected to the
following tests:
          1.   Breaking strength.
          2.   Mullen Burst.
          3.   MIT Flex -0.08 cm (0.03-in.) jaw @ 1.8 kg (4 Ib).
          4.   Loss on ignition @ 650°C  (1200°F).
          5.   Permeability.
     According  to  the testing program  conducted  by Environmental Consult-
ants for  SPS,  the  weakened area along  the  most severe fold lines were the
ones to  be tested  for mechanical strength rather  than  the stronger areas
away from the  fold  lines.   SPS believes that  testing  results obtained in
this manner are  more representative  of the  rate  of decay  in mechanical
properties  for  a material  since it will  be the weakened  areas that will
determine the fabric life.
     The  results of  Mullen Burst
the  fabrics are  shown  in
materials show  much  higher initial values-for both Mullen Burst and break-
ing strength than the 0.34 kg/m  (10 oz/yd ) fabrics, yet the rate of decay
of these  values is  seen to be much  higher.   The  higher initial values are
due to the stronger fill yarn construction of the heavier fabrics while the
difference in the rate of decline of the Mullen Burst and breaking strength
is due to the different reaction of the  fabrics to the baghouse environment
and wear during the cleaning process.
                                    46
   Burst and breaking strength testing for each of
   Figures 1  and  2.   The  0.48 kg/m   (14 oz/yd )

-------
     On  both plots,  the  highest  initial  values are  for the proprietary
Cris-0-Flex  (COF) coated material.  This  is  due  to the  fact that  the  fabric
was  not heat-cleaned  prior  to  application of  the coating.   Since heat
cleaning weakens  the fabric to  some  extent, the COF-finished material has
the  initial  advantage.-  This advantage is  seen  to decline, however,  as all
three of the 0.48 kg/m   (14  oz/yd ) materials appear to have  similar  Mullen
Burst values after a year  in service.
     Nomex,  the  only synthetic  fabric in service,  is shown on each  of the
plots  at  the  bottom.   This synthetic  material, having inferior tensile
properties  to glass,  nevertheless  excells in  the   critical  area of flex
strength.
     Aside  from  showing some different  characteristics of fabrics of dif-
ferent weight, the Mullen  Burst and breaking strength plots are disappoint-
ing  in  that there is nothing in the  appearance  of these curves to indicate
that two of  the test fabrics have reached termination of their useful life.
The  only indication of incipient failure obtained  from the fabric testing
results  is shown on the MIT Flex plot in  Figure 3.  Here the reduced MIT
value  (MIT Flex/Initial MIT Flex, M/M )  is plotted vs. service  life.  An
indication of incipient failure  is obtained by  looking at the steep slope
and  low values for M/M  for the 449 COF  and 449-1580  fabrics.   Both these
fabrics  are scheduled €o  be replaced due to the high  failure rate at Har-
rington.   That the MIT Flex tests should correlate  best with the progress
of fabric  wear is certainly understandable since, of all  the  testing meth-
ods, the  MIT Flex  most  accurately  duplicates   what the fabric  undergoes
during  cleaning.
     The existence of  a critical value  for M/M can be inferred  from the
simultaneous failure of the two fabrics  as they approach the same reduced
MIT  Flex value (r*0.07).   If such a critical value exists  at which termina-
tion of fabric  life can' be determined,  it should  become evident as the
remainder  of the  test  fabrics  fail.
     The data for Nomex is  shown on the  reduced MIT Flex plot  but  is not
directly comparable  to  the glass fabrics  since the test conditions were not
the  same.    The  MIT values  for Nomex were  obtained with a  2.3  kg  (5-lb)
weight  instead of the usual 1.81 kg (4-lb) weight  used for  glass in order
to  generate  numbers  in a reasonable amount of time.   The  Nomex data is
interpreted such  that  the  fabric appears  to yield acceptable  remaining life
and  is  in no way inferior  to  the glass  materials.   A  recent paper  titled
"SPS Experience With Fabric  Filtration" presents a more detailed  discussion
of  the  correlation between fabric  testing results  and actual  operating
conditions (1).

Failures by Compartmental  Position

     Any given section  of  bags  within  a compartment would be expected to
have roughly the  same  failure  rate as any other  section of bags,  all  things
being  equal.  In  the case  where bag failures  are  not  equally  distributed
throughout a  compartment,  the  cause  of higher failure rates   should be
identified and eliminated, if possible,  to save  costly  bag replacements and
to allow faulty design  concepts to be identified and eliminated.
     To analyze  the failure  rate  by compartment  position   at  Harrington
Station,  the  failures  that have occurred  to date  have been superimposed
onto a  single plot by  thimble  position as shown in  Figure 4.  Two types of
failures have been noted.   Any small hole  in a  fabric is referred to  as  a
                                    47

-------
"pinhole;" whereas, a  large  section ripped out of the fabric is shown as a
"blowout."
     The pinhole type  failure  is by far less prevalent now than during the
first year of  operation where  it was the  main failure type with the orig-
inal  fabric.   These  initial  failures  were  thought  to  be due  to  fabric
stretching resulting  in a lack  of tension and blousing  over  the thimble.
The data  indicate  that there is no discernible pattern to the pinhole type
of  failure.   Therefore, in  Figure 4,  only the blowout location is  shown.
The  blowout  failures  definitely  appear  to  occur more  often  in  certain
locations.  The outside two  rows account for 73 percent of all the blowout
failures.  Calculating the  failures per  thimble  position  for the outside
two rows  yields 0.91  failures  per thimble vs.  an overall average of 0.39-
     Narrowing the  failure area  to the four corner areas  two bags deep and
five  bags wide yields  the failure  rate  shown in Figure  5.  The two areas
adjacent  to the interior wall  are seen to  have the greatest failure rates
with  1.8  and  1.2  failures per thimble compared to 0.21 for thimbles  not in
the corner areas.   The  corner areas adjacent to the outside walls also show
significantly  higher  failure  rates  with  0.8 and  0.7  failures per thimble
position.  Factors  contributing  to these higher  failure  rates are thought
to  be hopper  shed  plate design  and  turbulent  flow distribution in the ash
hopper.

Failure Mechanisms in Filtration Fabrics

     The  two  fabric   styles undergoing  premature  failure at Harrington,
Criswell's 449 COF  and 449-1580, appear to be  experiencing a  wear pattern
that  is  typical of  the other fabrics  being tested except that these two
fabrics  are  damaged to a much  greater  degree.  The  typical  wear pattern
consists  of a  severely abraded area along a fold line in the fabric origi-
nating  at the top  and proceeding down the  fabric approximately one-third
the  length of  the bag.   Along  these abraded  fold lines  (called  "wooley
worms")  pinhole  failures occur  at irregular  spacings.   A single bag may
have  as  few  as two such lines or as many as six.  Eventually,  failure will
occur in the 0.48  kg/m  (14 oz/yd ) fabrics of  these "wooley worms"  as a
vertical  split up  to  several meters  (feet)  long.  The  lighter,  Teflon-
coated  fabrics,  however, most often exhibit  a rectangular-shaped blowout
where the fabric appears  to  have  had  a  section of  cloth cut  out  of it.
This behavior_is believed to be due to the weaker warp yarn construction of
the 0.34  kg/m  (10 oz/yd ) material.
     To  have  a closer  look  at a "wooley worm" failure, one of the affected
fabrics was removed from the baghouse and dissected.  The fabric chosen was
one  that had  a vertical  split along a  fold line.  In Photo  1,  the  inside
portion  of the fabric  is  shown  just above the tear.  From this photo the
full  extent of  the massive  fiber  damage along  these  fold  lines  can be
observed.  Although the example  shows only a single abraded area, it is not
uncommon  for  two such areas  to be very  close  to one another, suggesting
that  the fabric was  actually  folding back on  itself  and undergoing abra-
sion.
     The  deflation process  is expected to play only a  minor role  in the
development of the  "wooley worm" type failure observed at  Harrington since
the deflation  levels  employed  are very low (approximately  0.5 cm (0.2 in.)
w.g.) and observation  shows no  discernible  flexing  of  the  material.  In
order to  examine the effect  of shaking on the fabric, one compartment of an
EPA-sponsored  pilot baghouse  currently in  operation  at Harrington was re-
                                     48

-------
bagged  with  one  new  Criswell  449-1580  0.48 kg/m   (14 oz/yd )  graphite/
Teflon/silicone  (G/T/S)  coating) and one  Criswell 442-57DC2  0.34  kg/m   (10
oz/yd ) Teflon-coated).  The  other  thimbles  were left unbagged  to  allow  for
better  observation.   The effect of  the shaking  forces on these fabrics  was
then viewed by entering  the compartment at both  the  upper and lower  levels.
The motions of  the  fabric were complex;  however,  it was clearly apparent
that  the  shaking  forces were  responsible for causing folding and  flexing
along certain lines  in the fabric.
     The  two  fabrics appeared  to have  somewhat  different reactions to  the
shaking forces.   The 0.34 kg/m  (10-oz/yd ),  Teflon-coated material seemed
to  transmit the intensity of shake farther down the  fabric  than  the 0.48-
kg/ m  (14-oz/yd ) material.   By comparison,  the heavier fabric reacted to
the  same  shaking  forces in  a  more  sluggish and lethargic manner than  the
lighter material.  The 0.34-kg/m  (10-oz/yd  )  Teflon-coated fabric appeared
to  have  a  very "live"  reaction to  shaking.  The  degree to which  flexing
occurred  in  the  cloth was also different for the  two fabrics.  The rela-
tively  limp 14-oz. material appeared to be undergoing a more  severe  folding
action  while the  rigid  Teflon-coated  fabric  tended to  resist the  folding
forces.
      It is  felt that  this difference in  reaction to the shaking forces  may
play  the  principal role  in the premature  failure of  the 449 fabrics  instal-
led at  Harrington Station.  The more rigid Teflon coating may be protecting
the  fabric  by  mechanically  restricting its motion  during the  cleaning
cycle.   The  reaction of fabric to the forces employed  during cleaning is
undoubtedly one of  the  most  important factors in determining  fabric life.
Further studies  of  this type  are  planned  for  the  pilot unit in order to
better  define  the reaction  of various fabrics  to  shaking  forces  and  its
relation  to fabric wear.

Reducing  Fabric Wear

      After  an appreciation has been developed for  the  mechanisms involved
in fabric  wear,  the next  logical  step  is to  attempt to  minimize these
actions by  some means .    One method of  reducing the severity  of  the fold-
 ing and  flexing wear  occurring during the  shaking  process that appears to
hold  promise is that  of employing smaller shake amplitude by replacing  the
existing  eccentric with one  having less  of a throw.  The intention  of such
a change is  that  the fabric would undergo less  severe flexing; however, if
this  is the  only  change made, cleaning will  suffer as more  dust  cake will
be left on the  fabric.   Dennis (2) has shown that  dust removal is a linear
function  of  the acceleration  applied  to a  fabric.  The Acceleration,  a,
imparted  to a  fabric  during  shaking is proportional  to  Af   where A is  the
amplitude and f is the frequency.   Dennis gives  the equation
                                                                  (1)
      where k -   0.7.
 The ratio of acceleration compared to some standard values for A and f on a
 given system can be calculated from
                                              2           2
      (acceleration ratio)          a_   _  Af  „  _   Yd        (2)
                                    a    ~  A f        Y A 2
                                     s       s s        s s

                                      49

-------
where
     d = sheave diameter
     Y = eccentric throw

If,  for  example,  the  fabric was being  shaken by  a  mechanism employing a
13.5-cm (5.3-in.) drive pulley and a 1.3-cm (1/2-in.) throw eccentric and a
change of  eccentric is  accomplished to  one  with  a  1  cm (3/8-in.) throw,
then the acceleration would be only 75 percent of its former value.
     A study was undertaken at Harrington to determine the impact of ampli-
tude and frequency changes on cleaning by placing different sizes of eccen-
trics and  shaker  motor pulleys (sheaves) on  several  compartments and mea-
suring the change in flow through the compartment with manometers installed
across the outlet dampers.
     The relative flow after  cleaning vs. the acceleration  ratio plot is
shown in  Figure  6.   The  plot  confirms  the  results  reported  by Dennis in
that  a  directly  proportional  measure of dust removal,  through-put after
cleaning,  is  linearly related  to the acceleration imparted  to the fabric
during shaking.
     From  Figure  6  it is apparent, then, that reducing the eccentric throw
from  1.3 cm  (1/2-in.)  to 1 cm (3/8-in.) would cause an unacceptable lower-
ing  of flow  through a compartment if no other changes were made.  However,
as  can  also be seen  from the  plot, the  installation of  a 15.2-cm (6-in.)
pulley brings  the acceleration ratio back close  to 1.0 and the flow comes
back  to  the same level  as under the  original  conditions.   Therefore,  in-
creasing sheave  size  can be used in conjunction  with smaller shake ampli-
tudes without incurring unacceptable losses in cleaning.  In light of this,
studies are  now underway to determine the effect on fabric wear of employ-
ing  1-cm  (3/8-in.)  eccentrics  and 15.2-cm  (6-in.)  shaker  motor pulleys
instead  of the  13.5-cm  (5.3-in.) pulleys and  1.3-cm (1/2-in.) eccentrics
currently  being used.

                              CONCLUSION

     The results  of fabric filtration analyses are now beginning to reveal
performance trends for various types of fabrics.  In the coming months, SPS
plans to   look  at dust and flow  distribution by  analyzing individual com-
partment pressure drop behavior.  SPS hopes to make more compartment obser-
vations  and conduct  individual  compartment  through-put  measurements.   In
addition,  SPS  will continue  to-evaluate  different fabrics,  including two
entire compartments of 0.34 kg/m  (10 oz/yd ) Acid Flex coated bags and one
compartment  of 0.19 kg/m  (5.5 oz/yd )  Nomex  bags.   As  results of these
studies  become available,  SPS  looks  forward  to sharing them  with other
utilities  considering  fabric  selection  in association with  coal-fired
boilers.

                                 ENDNOTES

1.   Chambers,  R.  C.,  Ladd, K. L., and  Kunka,  S. L., "SPS Experience With
     Fabric  Filtration,"  presented  at  5th International  Fabric  Filter
     Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, January 1981.

2.   Dennis, R.C.,  Cass,  R.W., Cooper, D.W., Hall, R.R., Hampl, V., Klenan,
     H.A., Langley,  J.E.,  and  Stern,  R.W.,  GCA  Corporation.   "Filtration
     Model for Coal Fly Ash With Glass Fabrics," EPA-600/7-77-084  (NTIS No.
     PB 276 489), August  1977.      50

-------
Ui   «
                  IOO
                           200       30O

                            Days In Service
                                                                      350!
                                                                      30O-
                                                                                                                442 Tef Ion
                                                                                 100
             —r-
             200      300
              Days in Service
                                                                                                           400      500
                 Figure I.   Mullen Burst
Figure 2.   Breaking Strength

-------
             20O     300
            Days in Service
Figure  3.   Reduced MIT Flex vs. Time
Figure 4.   Failures by Thimble Position

-------
               Interior Wall
i.e

1.2
0.21
Failed Bags Per
Thimble
0.8

0.7
               Exterior Wall


       Overall Average - 0.39 Failures by Thimble
                                                          o>  1.0
                                                        * £
                                                        O c
                                                        »   0.
                                                            0.7
                                                            0.6
                                                                                                     6.0 in. Pulley
                                                                                                     3/8 in.Eccentric
        5.3in.PuH«y
        l/4 in. Eccentric
                      i. Pulley
                   '/4 in. Eccentric
                                                                       1cm - 0.39 in.
                                                                             o.s
                                                                          Acceleration —
                                                                            Ratio     BS
                                                                                     o     Afz
                                                                                                         5.3in. Pulley
                                                                                                         ''1 in. Eccentric
                                                                                                        t.o
Figure 5. Failure by Compartment  Position
Figure 6.  Effects  of  Various Sheave
       And Eccentric Sizes  on Cleaning

-------
Photo 1.  Dissection of "Wooley Worm" Failure
                      54

-------
                       SPS PILOT BAGHOUSE OPERATION

             By: Kenneth Ladd, Wanda Hooks, and Sherry Kunka
                   Southwestern Public Service Company
                             P. 0. Box 1261
                         Amarillo, Texas  79170

                              Dale Harmon
               Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                     Environmental Protection Agency
              Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711

                                ABSTRACT

     In 1977, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) executed a contract
with Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS) to assess the performance of
a  large  fabric  filter  system used  on a  new  utility boiler  burning  low
sulfur Western  coal.   One option of this contract provided for the instal-
lation of a  pilot filter system on-stream  with  Harrington Station Unit 2.
This paper outlines  the overall objectives of the  pilot unit program.   In
addition, proper  system design,  problems in start-up  and  operation,  and a
fabric evaluation program are discussed.

                             INTRODUCTION

     Southwestern  Public Service  Company's fabric  filter  study contract
(EPA  No.  68-02-2659)  with  the  EPA  included  a  provision to  exercise  an
option for  a pilot  baghouse.   In  1980,  the EPA elected  to  exercise this
option.  Southwestern  agreed to  operate and maintain  a  pilot unit at Har-
rington Station in conjunction with Unit 2 for a 3-year period.
     The objectives  of this option are  (1)  to  operate the slipstream unit
under  the  same  operating  parameters  as the full-scale  unit, and  (2)  to
develop  scale-up  parameters from  the slipstream unit to  the large opera-
tion.  Additionally,  optimization  of  operating  techniques will  be deter-
mined  on  the pilot  baghouse and applied to the  full-scale unit.  Another
phase  of  the pilot  project is to conduct  detailed  studies on fabric per-
formance.  Individual fabrics will be examined to assess the performance of
bags with different coatings.  The cleaning effect of various weaves and of
different  sizing  removal  procedures   (chemical  cleaning, heat  cleaning,
coronizing) will also be studied.

Description

     The pilot unit is a Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., Model 366, Series 11.5 RS
Dustube Dust Collector.  It has two 6-bag  compartments  and initially was
fitted with  Criswell  Style  442 10 percent  Teflon-coated  fabric.   The bags
were 29.2 cm (11.5 in.) in  diameter and 9302cm (366 in.) long, untensioned.
Cloth area per compartment  is 51 m  (549 ft )
     The unit is  operated by a 480-V  control panel and an instrumentation
panel.  The  480-V control panel houses the  damper  controls,  hopper heater
controls, cleaning cycle timers,  fan start/stop controls,  and bypass auto-
matic controls.   The instrumentation panel housesAP, flow, and temperature
monitoring devices as noted  in Table 1.
                                    55

-------
                    TABLE 1.   INSTRUMENTATION PANEL
         AP west recorder
          Flow west recorder
          Outlet temp recorder
          West compartment flow
          Inlet temp—temp control
          Dampers
                  AP east recorder
                   Flow east recorder
                   Inlet temp recorder
                   East compartment flow
                   Off preheater, hot and cold
Installation
     The installation of  the  pilot baghouse began when the modules arrived
on the job  site  around  June 1, 1979.   The pilot is installed at the south-
east corner  of the east  baghouse  on  Harrington's Unit 2.   The  inlet flue
gas to  the  pilot is pulled from the  east inlet duct of  the main baghouse
and mixed with the  hot  preheater flue gas  with a mixing valve to maintain
temperature.  (See Figure 1, Pilot Baghouse Schematic.)
     The actual installation consists  of the following:
     41 cm (16-in.) I.D.
     30 cm (12-in.) I.D.
     20 cm  (8-in.) O.D.
     36 cm (14-in.) I.D.
     20 cm  (8-in.) O.D.
     41 cm (16-in.) I.D.
     15 cm  (6-in.) O.D.
     36 cm (14-in.) I.D.
     36 cm (14-in.) I.D.
     41 cm (16-in.) I.D.
         Elbow from preheater prior to reduction
         From preheater
         Bypass
         To east and west inlet before branch
         To east and west inlet after branch
         From main baghouse inlet duct
         Recirculation
         From pilot outlet plenum to main fan
         Crossover from main fan
         From main fan crossover to main baghouse duct
     Deflation
     Main fan
     Shaker

     Variable-speed
     shaker
              Motors

 7.5 kW (10 H.P.)  3600 rpm
37.3 kW (50 H.P.)  3600 rpm
 0.75 kW (1 H.P.)   900 rpm
 3.75 kW (5 H.P.)  1710 rpm
Siemens - Allis, Inc.
Siemens - Allis, Inc.
3/60/230/460
Siemens - Allis, Inc.

Reliance
     30 cm (12-in.)
     15 cm  (6-in.)
     20 cm  (8-in.)
     10 cm  (4-in.)
             Dampers

    Outlet - Poppet
    Deflation - Butterfly
    Bypass - Butterfly
    Recirculaton-Manual Operation - Recirc. Deflation
    Dust Air - Butterfly
                                    56

-------
                                   Fans

     Deflation           222-4-15 PBF Thermal-aire Design
                         Garden City Fan Co.

     Main                15RF2 Thermal-aire Design
                         Garden City Fan Co.

                            SCOPE OF WORK

     The  pilot unit  is designed  to be  used over  a  3-year period  for  a
series  of research activities.  Certain  "technical  directives,"  or tasks,
have been set out in  the  contract f6r the pilot  study.   When  these tasks
are accomplished,  they will be written up as task reports and published as
individual publications under EPA cover.
     SPS  and  the  EPA  discussed several  areas of  potential  testing  and
developed  a  list  of  tasks which  reflected the interest  of both parties.
These study areas  include:
     Filtration parameters - Average    K_C and AP  daily so

     that these parameters may be studied versus air-to-cloth ratio.


     Particulate  Tests -  Inlet/outlet  grain loading  and  particulate size
     distribution  to  determine  fabric  efficiency, size  distribution,  and
     comparison of grain loadings to main unit.

     Modeling Parameter - Find K_, AP_ as a function of V by varying
                                 Z    Ci
     air-to-cloth ratio, to be used in developing a filtration empirical

     model.


     Extended Filtration  Time - To determine the  effect  of extending fil-
     tration  time on  system  pressure drop  (clean  better  but less often).

     Scale-up  -  Develop  scale-up  equations from a pilot  unit  to a multi-
     compartment  fabric filter system.

     Reverse Air  Cleaning  - Information will also be used to develop model-
     ing parameters  for reverse  air cleaning.

     Fabric  Testing - Evaluate  fabrics not already  under test and exotic
     fabrics too  expensive for full-compartment assessment.

     Future  Studies  -  Investigate potential of extending studies to higher
     grain loadings  and utilizing other fly ashes because of variability of
     coal supplies to  other utilities.

Start-up Plan

     Prior  to the  actual start-up,  a  preliminary equipment checkout was
conducted.  The 480-V  control panel was energized with all valves from flue
                                    57

-------
gas sources  closed.   Hopper heaters were set at  132°C (270°F) and allowed
to heat for 16 hours prior to start-up.  With all controllers in the closed
position, the outside  dampers  were manually opened and the following steps
taken.
     1.   Open damper from preheater.
     2.   Open flue gas inlet damper.
     3.   Open return damper.
     4.   Open inlet damper to main fan.
     5.   Open bypass butterfly valve.
     6.   Close bypass valve.
     7.   Open outlet dampers.
     8.   Start main fan.
     9.   Activate east and west flow controllers.
    10.   Activate temperature controller.
    11.   Start deflation fan.
    12.   Set cleaning cycle to automatic.

     The  inlet  temperature was  controlled  automatically at  232°C (450°F)
for the  first 24 hours,  at which time it was decreased  to  204°C (400°F).
The inlet flow was 935 m /h (550 acfm) for 2 hours at an air-to-cloth ratio
of  1.   At the  end of  the  2-hour period,  the  air-to-cloth  ratio  was in-
creased, but not to exceed 2 for the first 24 hours.
     The  cleaning  cycle  was not to be activated until theAP reached 13 cm
(5  in.)  w.g.  At  13 cm (5 in.)  w.g.,  the  cleaning cycle was  set  up  on a
20-sec  shake.   Each  compartment was  to  clean on  a 33-min  cycle,  25-sec
settle,  and  35-sec  final  settle.  Ash was  to  be  manually  removed once a
day,  one hopper  at  a  time,  until  automatic mode  modifications  could be
made.

                              OPERATION

     The  pilot  baghouse was  first placed in service  on  October 23,  1979;
however,  painting,  insulating,  guard  rail  installation, and construction
cleanup  continued  for about 8 weeks.  On initial start-up,  excessive  con-
densation  was  present.   Therefore,  to  prevent  moisture condensation on
future  start-ups,  the manual  inlet from the  air preheater  was opened to
allow  compartments to heat.
     Prior to the  annual Harrington Unit 2 outage,  numerous  problems  were
encountered.  Immediate  problems after start-up were  (a) high temperature
loss;  (b) constant tripping of the variable speed shaker motor;  (c) improp-
er  wiring;  (d)  inadequate  bracing of the inner  compartment  wall;  and (e)
in-leakage.   These problems  were  minor  and were  resolved  shortly after
start-up.
     The  biggest  problem,  in-leakage, was  believed  to  be  due  to warped
doors, all four of which it was decided to replace.   By the end of November
1979  the new  doors  had arrived;  installation  was  completed  in  4 days.
Ultrasonic  leak testing was performed by SPS and  WFI  engineers and small
leaks  in the back wall were repaired.

Modifications and Problems

     During  the 1979  fall outage  (October  26-December  10)  the following
pilot modifications were made for ease of operation:
                                    58

-------
     1.    Made ash system automatic with main unit.
     2.    Installed compartment isolation switches.
     3.    Relocated  cleaning  cycle  timers  to  enclosure  on back  of 480-V
          breaker for ease of  access.
     After the annual  outage,  the pilot was again started up on January 3,
1980.  Start-up followed the standard procedure established for the initial
start-up with  1700  m /m (1000 acfm), 232°C (450°F) on inlet, and automatic
cleaning at  33-min  intervals.   After 4  days,  the air-to-cloth  ratio  was
decreased  to  2 to  see  if lower flow would  increase  the  temperature loss.
The  temperature  loss,  however,  held  stable  at 43°-46°C  (110°-115°F).
During the following few days  the instrument shop confirmed that both inlet
and outlet thermocouples were  performing accurately.
     By mid-January, it was obvious that the temperature loss due to possi-
ble  air  leakage  was going to  have  to be dealt with.  Faulty outlet damper
packings were  found to  be pulling  air  in directly  on top of  the outlet
thermocouple.   Both sides  were  packed  and  have  worked well  ever since.
     The  temperature loss  problem still had not been  completely solved,
however.   A  new  temperature tap was put in the outlet plenum to see if the
outlet thermocouple  and the one in the plenum read the same; they did.   At
this  time  temperature  probes were  placed in  manometer  taps  at  the  cell
plate level  to see  if temperature  loss  was uniform throughout each com-
partment:   some  evidence  pointed  to  ash hopper  or  below the  cell plate
in-leakage.  A check of  the  in-leakage ash  through  the  hopper dump gates
failed to  reveal  significant in-leakage.
     In February, SPS began a  series of four 0_ tests, performed by the SPS
environmental  test  group.   These tests  still pointed to  high in-leakage
with the  temperature  loss  at a  3.4 air-to-cloth   ratio at  17°C  (63°F).
Eventually,  a  faulty fabrication weld in the west ash hopper was discover-
ed.  The joint had been tack-welded and never seal-welded.  This was prompt-
ly repaired.
     In  April  1980, leaks were  repaired in the roof at  the wall joint in
both the  east and  west compartments.   In addition, leakage  was repaired
below the  cell plate on the east side.  By mid-April, CL testing had shown
that in-leakage  was at an acceptable  level.   The  pilot unit was scheduled
for  official  start-up,  and the doors were  sealed  with silicone to prevent
future in-leakage.
     By  May  5, 1980,  the  pilot unit was on  line  and was operating satis-
factorily.  The most recent in-leakage test proved acceptable:   it showed a
temperature loss  of  only 8°C  (47°F) at an air-to-cloth ratio of 3.4.

Special Testing

     For 4 days  in mid-July 1980,  the  SPS  environmental test group tested
the  pilot baghouse  to  measure particulate  and  gaseous  emissions.  Test
procedures were  those specified for EPA  Methods  1,   2,  3, 4, and 5  (40 CFR
60,  Appendix A).  Results  are  shown in Table  2.
     This  limited amount  of  testing indicates  that flue gas constituents
for  the  pilot  baghouse are equivalent to those of the main baghouse.  Fog
instance,  an  average  inlet particulate  concentration  of  4.6  (±0.7) g/m3
(2.0 (±0.3) gr/scf)  for the pilot baghouse is  comparable to 3.9  (±0.9) g/m
(1.7  (±0.4)  gr/scf)  for  the  main  baghouse.    (Note  that  averages  for the
pilot baghouse  are  based on three  samples,  and averages for the main bag-
house  are  based  on 21  samples.)   On the  pilot baghouse  outlet side,  an
                                    59

-------
                            TABLE  2.   PARTICULATE  TEST  SUMMARY
Orsat Gas
Analysis, %
  CO,
  CO"

  °2
  N2
Particulate
Results

% Moisture

Wet Stack Gas
  Mol. Wt.

Particulate Con-,
  centration g/m~

Run 1
13.7
0.0
5.7
80.6
11.3
29.0
5.5
K2.4)
Inlet
Run 2
13.9
0.0
5.5
80.7
11.3
29.0
4.4
(1.9)

Run 3
14.8
0.0
5.3
80.5
11.1
29.1
3.9
(1.7)

Run 1
13.0
0.0
6.5
80.5
11.1
29.0
0.0
Outlet
Run 2
13.4
0.0
6.1
80.5
11.0
29.0
0.0

Run 3
13.4
0.0
6.0
80.6
10.5
29.1
0.0
Isokinetic
  Variation, %
97.9
96.7
96.9
                                       101.8
101.7
                                                       99.5

-------
average  particulate emission  rate of  1.3(±0.4)ng/J(0.003 (±0.001) lb/106
Btu) compares gto an average particulate  emission rate of 13(±4)ng/J (0.03
(±0.01)  lb/10   Btu)  for  the main  baghouse  (pilot  baghouse  averages  are
based on 3 samples and main baghouse  averages  based on 10  samples).
     Similar  tests in the future will determine the value  of using pilot
flue gas  testing results  as  scale-up factors  to the main baghouse to com-
pare  fabric  efficiency,   size  distribution,  and grain loadings.  Factors
such as  the  length  of time  bags have been in service and pressure drop,
however,  may  also  be needed  before  drawing  conclusions  about baghouse
performance based  on data  from the pilot  unit.

Data Collection

     Official  data on  the Criswell  442-57DC2 bags  was collected from May
through  September  1980.    This data was collected at  air-to-cloth ratios of
1.94, 2.20, 2.50,  2.80, and 3.40.   (See Table  3, Data Collection  Averages.)
Each  average  in  this  table  represents  48  cleaning  cycles  with  96 data
points each.
     To  determine the  specific  resistance  coefficient (K_),  the pressure
drop across the bags at both the beginning (&Pp) and  the end (j^PT) of the
cleaning cycle  must  be known.   The  pressure  drop  is recorded on a paper
chart  recorder.   To  obtain numbers  for  calculating AP_ and K«, the strip
chart  must  be  unrolled,  the cleaning  cycles measured^  and  a line drawn
through  the linear part of the  graph.  AP_,  is measured by an  extrapolation
of this  line.   Values  for  APE andAP   are then used to calculate  an average
value for K-C with the  aid of a  programmable calculator.
     The cleaning cycle   is about 30 minutes  long,  and there are two com-
partments to  be calculated.   This  means that  for  every 15  minutes, this
process  must be performed.   It  takes approximately 60 man-hours per month
to obtain values  for K~  and APp by  this method (2,880 cleaning  cycles per
30-day  period,  5,760  points  to read AP_ andAP  for  each 30-day  cleaning
cycle, 28,800 points  per  data chart).

Reverse  Air Experiments

     During the Unit 2 1980  fall outage  (October 3-November  8),  plans were
made  for a reverse air  experiment on the west side  of the pilot baghouse.
By October 23,  1980, the Criswell  442-57DC2 bags  had been  removed.  The
east  compartment was fitted  with six used Nomex bags' and the  west  with six
new ringed Kennecott 0.28 g  (10 oz)  bags.   In order  to avoid  ash carryover
from  one  compartment  to  the  other  during  cleaning,  the  Nomex compartment
employed shake  cleaning only, while  the  test  compartment used  reverse air
cleaning.
     For the  reverse air  experiment, the cleaning cycle timers were  set  as
follows:
           First settle -  30 sec.
           Reverse  air -  45 sec.
           Second settle -  30  sec.
           45-min intervals for 3 days.
           60-min intervals for duration of test.
     The reverse  air  start-up  followed  standard procedure  (204 C (400  F)
inlet  temperature, air-to-cloth ratio  2.0).  Performance of the pilot  unit
during  the reverse  air mode  was satisfactory with  only minor  mechanical
                                     61

-------
                                                     TABLE  3.  DATA  COLLECTION AVERAGES
N5

Air-to-Cloth
Ratio May_ June
APE APT APE APT
1.94
2.20
2.50
2.80 4.62 5.39
3.40 5.93 7.34 5.12 6.45

Air-to-Cloth
Ratio May June
AP£ APT APE APT
1.94
2.20
2.50
2.80 4.44 5.12
3.40 4.93 6.41 4.74 5.89
Criswell 442-57DC2 Fabric
Inlet Temperature 204°C (400°F)
Cleaning Interval - 33 minutes, 20-second shake
Each average represents 48 cleaning cycles, 96
EAST
July
APE
2.65
3.36

4.67
6.17
WEST

July
APE
3.14
3.59

4.65
5.74



data points.


~A JTr«
2.97
3.68

5.39
7.64



APT
3.43
4.03

5.39
7.12



K,

August September
APE APT AP£ AP.
3.09 3.44 3.60 3

4 . 66 5

6.93 8.25 6.38 7


August September
APE APT AP£ AP,
3.32 3.64 2.98 3

4.03 4

6.20 7.36 6.40 7



= 15-28 in. w.fc. min. ft.


r
.89

.13

.62



T
.29

.46

.61




           AP_ ia pressure drop across bags at beginning of cleaning cycle.

           AP_ is pressure drop across bags at end of cleaning cycle.

            Averages reported in in. w.g. (1 cm = 0.39 in.).
                                                                                                 Ib
                                                                                                   m

-------
problems,  if the Nomex  fabric was  cleaned every  hour  without deflation.
The Kennecott  fabric averaged a  residualAP of 16.0 cm  (6.31  in. w.g.); a
terminal AP of 19.8 cm  (7.78 in. w.g.) for a  60-min cleaning cycle at an
air-to-cloth  ratio  of  2.3;  and  an  inlet  temperature  of  204°C  (400°F),
during the  14-day test.
     On December 31, 1980,  the pilot  was taken  off  line for  installation of
the second test fabric (Fabric Filters 502-1 Acid  Flex).  To obtain faster
break-in,  cleaning  was  set  at  automatic   30-min.  intervals regardless of
pressure  drop.   Following the break-in period,  the cleaning cycle was set
to 60-min  and the test extended to 3  weeks.
     The  SPS reverse air testing program  will  run through July 1981.  SPS
plans  to  run 11 tests during this time,  involving various  fabric finishes
and  numbers of rings in  the bag.  Table 4  shows  the fabrics  to be evalu-
ated.
          TABLE  4.   PILOT BAGHOUSE TEST FABRIC SELECTION

      Bag  Type                  Bag Weight g (oz)        Supplier
  1.   Kennecott                 0.28 (10)               Kennecott
  2.   502-1  Acid Flex          0.40 (H)               Fabric Filters
      (Burlington 1625)
  3.   Q78-877                   0.40 (14)               Globe-Albany
  4.   449-COF(Heat
      cleaned)                  0.40 (14)               W.  W. Criswell
  5.   Fabric Filters 504-1
      Tex  Flex                  0.28 (10)               W.  W. Criswell
  6.   Fabric Filters 504-1
      Tuff Coat                 0.28 (10)               W.  W. Criswell
  7.   502-1  Tuff Coat
      (Burlington)             0.40 (14)               Fabric Filters
  8.   601  Tuflex               0.28 (10)               Menardi Southern
  9-   Best candidate from previous with seven rings.
 10.   Same as  Item 9, except five rings.
 11.   Same as  Item 9, except nine rings, if time allows.


                           ENDNOTES

 1.    Chambers,  R.  C.,  Ladd,  K.  L. ,  and Kunka,  S. L. ,  "SPS Experience With
      Fabric Filtration" presented at 5th International Fabric Filter Forum,
      Phoenix,  Arizona,  January 1981.

 2.    Dennis,  R. C.,  Cass,  R. W. , Cooper, D. W. , Hall, and Stern,  R. W.  GCA
      Corporation.   "Filtration  Model  for Coal Fly Ash With Glass Fabrics,
      "EPA-600/7-77-084 (NTIS No. PB 276 489), August 1977.
                                    63

-------











ON
-C-















AIR






GAS DUCT
TO AIR
PREHEATEF
370° G
(70O

-------
                      REVIEW OF SPS INVESTIGATION OF
               HARRINGTON STATION UNIT 2 FABRIC FILTER SYSTEM

                  By:  Kenneth Ladd and Sherry Kunka
                   Southwestern Public Service Company
                              P. 0. Box 1261
                          Amarillo, Texas  79170
                                ABSTRACT

     For  the  last  three  years, Southwestern  Public Service Company (SPS)
has tested and monitored the Harrington Station Unit 2 fabric filter system
in an  effort  to characterize its operation.  This fabric filter system was
one of  the  first large air  quality control devices to be used in associa-
tion with a  low-sulfur, coal-fired boiler.  Start-up, monitoring, testing,
and operation of the  fabric filter  system since an EPA-sponsored program
began in October, 1977  are discussed  in this paper.
     In addition, the operation and maintenance problems encountered during
the first year  of  the program are  reviewed.  A summary  of the extensive
flue gas  and  particulate sampling performed by  SPS and its subcontractor,
GCA  Corporation,  is  presented.   A  brief  discussion  of  fabric  problems
encountered during  the  last  three years is  also included.

                              INTRODUCTION

Background

     Southwestern  Public Service  Company  (SPS),  an electric  utility with
headquarters  in  Amarillo, Texas, undertook  a project with the Environmental
Protection  Agency  (EPA)  in  1977  to  assess  a new  application  for fabric
filter technology.   The site  selected for the  study  was Harrington Station,
SPS's  first  coal-fired generating plant.   In  1978 when it was put on-line,
Harrington's  Unit No.  2 was the  first  new  utility boiler to be equipped
with a fabric filter system  (baghouse)  for  particulate control.  Its effec-
tiveness  in  controlling emissions from a coal-fired boiler was  of special
interest  to  the EPA in its  effort  to set standards  for air  quality control
equipment.
     The  objectives established for  the  study are described below.  These
objectives were  formulated to  help utilities  and other coal-burning facil-
ities  obtain  information for  evaluating  air control  alternatives.   SPS
especially hopes to  aid those burning low-sulfur  Western coal.

     1.   Determine  operating and maintenance costs  of an  operating fabric
          filter system over  an extended  period of time  in order to give
          other  utilities data on the economic  feasibility of baghouses.
     2.   Characterize  performance   of  the  unit  by looking  at  specific
          parameters which  include  (a)  an assessment of the  effect  of
          pressure  drop versus time; (b)  removal efficiency to be deter-
          mined  by  special manual testing;  (c)  continuous  opacity  monitor-

                                 65

-------
          ing;  (d)  an  investigation of the  long-term reliability  of the
          systems; and  (e) determination of  optimum operating conditions.
     3.   Bag  performance  and  bag  life  will be  studied by  (a)  periodic
          removal of  test  bags for  analysis  by  an independent consultant;
          (b)  analysis   of pressure drop  and thru-put  on an individual
          compartment basis; and (c) other special fabric studies.

     The study  is now in its fourth year.   The remaining project time will
be  spent  analyzing  continuous  monitoring  data and  assessing  the  cost of
operation and  maintenance  activities.   Project activities during the first
two years of study are discussed in the first and second annual reports (1,
2).

Facility Description

     Harrington Station, SPS's  first coal-fired plant, is located approxi-
mately five miles northeast of Amarillo, Texas.  The first 360 MW unit went
into operation July,  1976; a  second 360 MW unit went on-line  in  1978 and
Unit 3 was brought into service in 1980.
     The  particulate  emission  control device  selected  for Unit  2  is  a
Wheelabrator-Frye,  Inc.  (WFI)  fabric filter baghouse  system.   It  is de-
signed to operate at  a  flue gas flow  of  1,650,000 acfm at 313°F.   Minimum
design efficiency is 98.6 percent,  which would permit 0.1 pounds of partic-
ulate per million BTU out the stack.  The exterior of the baghouse has 3.5
inches of fiberglass insulation; there is no insulation between plenums and
compartments.  Other design parameters are summarized in Table I.

             Table I.   Fabric Filter System Design Parameters

          Compartments                    28
          Bags per compartment           204
          Bag diameter                    11.5 inches
          Bag length                      30.5 feet
          Bag spacing, center to center   14.0 inches
          Air-to-cloth ratio, gross        3.16:1
          Air-to-cloth ratio, net          3.40:1
          Bag reach                        2

Start-up

     SPS  formulated a start-up procedure for the Harrington Station fabric
filter  system after reviewing  start-up experience  of other utilities and
after  consulting  individuals  known to have experience in start-up of these
systems.  A set of guidelines was written for the actual start-up and these
were described in an earlier paper devoted to start-up of the fabric filter
system (3).
     No  start-up  difficulties were  experienced.   Problems  associated with
the acid dewpoint had been of concern but neither bag blinding or corrosion
due to  excessive moisture  was noted.   As the final bypass  damper closed,
the opacity  dropped to  one percent.  This drop  was  signalled dramatically
by the perfectly clear stack.
     Approximately three  weeks after  the  baghouse  was  initially started,
SPS was  able  to  operate Unit  2  at full  load with  only coal  in service.
Since that time,  the  unit has operated at  loads  consistently above 200 MW
and during peak periods, loads over 350 MW.
                                66

-------
               OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE EXPERIENCE

     The fabric  filter system has  functioned very well in terms of overall
performance.   Consistent  stack opacity monitor  readings in the two to four
percent  range indicate that  the baghouse  is  doing  an  excellent clean-up
job.  Specific areas of operating  and maintenance experience are discussed
below.   Despite the  favorable  removal efficiency  of  flyash from the low
sulfur coal,  some major concerns arose.  The first major difficulites to be
encountered  were high  pressure  drop and problems  with  cleaning the bags.
Later,  fabric wear  and performance resulted in a  need  for evaluation and
change.

Deflation

     Unit  2  started up  and  operated  until mid-June,  1979 without  good
deflation  control.   WFI recommended that deflation  levels be at 0.5 inches
w=g., which  was  very difficult to maintain manually.
     During  this period of time, SPS ran tests  to see if bags were pancak-
ing  at  0.5  inches  w.g. deflation  pressure;  results indicated  that severe
pancaking  was taking place.   By watching bags through observation ports in
one  compartment  and  lowering the deflation pressure  drop until pancaking no
longer  occurred, 0-1 to 0.2 of  an  inch w.g. deflation pressure was deter-
mined to be an  appropriate level to prevent pancaking.  A control unit was
installed  by WFI, which gave  operators  the  capability  to change deflation
from the control room,  enhancing the ability to  keep  deflation at indicated
levels.

Shake

     Correction  of  deflation  improved  baghouse  operation,  but  it was ap-
parent  that the bags  still were  not being adequately cleaned.   More force
was  needed to release  the  fly ash  from  the  cloth.   To determine the effect
of  increased acceleration  on cleaning, SPS decided to run some experimental
tests  with  6-inch  shaker  pulleys  in place  of  the  4-inch diameter pulleys
originally provided.   Modifying the amplitude  of  the shaker  to increase
fabric  acceleration  during  cleaning would  have required fabrication of a
special  eccentric.   Shaker frequency, however, is modified simply by chang-
ing  the  main drive pulley  on the  shaker  motor shaft.
     Table II shows a  summary of compartment pressure drop comparisons for
the  4-inch and 6-inch diameter shaker pulleys.

         Table II.   Summary of Compartment  AP  Comparisons*

               AP	Difference	Compartment    AP   Difference
	 A 	
17
21
23
9
8
8
.75
.30
.65
0.
1.
1.
45
45
10
(4-inch)
(4-inch)
(4-inch)
17
21
23
10
7
7
.37
.13
.33
0
3
3
.00
.24
.04
(4-inch)
(6-inch)
(6-inch)
* @  350  raw.

      It  appeared that the  increased  shake doubled or tripled the  decrease
in  pressure drop.   As a result  of  the experimental work with 6-inch dia-
meter shaker pulleys,  SPS decided to  replace all of the  4-inch pulleys with
5.3-inch pulleys in all  of the compartments.
                                  67

-------
Adjustment to Shaker Mechanisms

     Increased shaker frequency (or rapidity) resulted in problems with the
existing pillow  blocks.   The  original structure  simply had pillow blocks
bolted to  a  plate without any lateral  support  and at least a quarter inch
of shims was  used to properly locate the pillow block.  After installation
of 6-inch  pulleys on shaker mechanisms, the  higher  forces caused movement
of pillow blocks  and eventual damage to shaker mechanisms.
     To remedy the  situation,  SPS designed a modified pillow block support
structure.  Since this modification was made in August,  1979,  no failures
have been observed due to loose pillow blocks.

Ventilation System

     The design of the Harrington Station Unit 2 baghouse leaves the inside
compartment and  duct walls  uninsulated in order to  allow the compartments
to be  heated while  the  flue gas bypasses the baghouse.   This  design pre-
vents condensation and corrosion problems during start-up.  Single compart-
ment inspections  can be performed  with the  unit on-line as  long  as  it is
not  necessary for personnel  to  enter the upper level  of the compartment.
Since replacement of blown-out bags requires upper  level  entry where tem-
peratures  may be  greater than 130°, a  ventilation system became necessary
for each compartment.
     The ventilation system consists of a single fan on the ground level in
duct work  to  and dampers for  each  of  the  28 compartments.  The system has
been sized to deliver approximately 60,000 cfm of ambient air for compart-
ment cooling.

Replacement of Hopper Heaters

     Original hopper  heaters  in  the Unit 2  fabric filter system were made
of  silicone  rubber and  applied with an  adhesive  to  the  hopper  shell.
During  the first year of operation,  99  percent  of  these heaters failed.
Beginning  in  September of 1979, they were replaced with a modular box-style
heater.

Safety Features

     During  a Unit  2  outage in  April of 1979, safety  devices  to prevent
doors from blowing shut were placed on all compartment doors.  Seals on all
compartment  doors were  also  replaced on  an as-needed  basis   during  the
second year of study.

Opacity

     The Lear-Siegler RM41  Opacity  Monitor appears to be a very stable and
dependable instrument.  To date,  the device has needed very few adjustments
and  has had  few maintenance  problems.  The sensitivity of the  unit has
allowed it to be  used in precise pinpointing of failed bags by compartment.
     In order to get good  measurements,  however,  it is  necessary to do a
clear stack alignment while the unit is off-line,  i.e., during an overhaul.
All attempts  to do bench alignments have proven unsatisfactory.

                                68

-------
                            SPECIAL  TESTING

     One of  the major aims of  the SPS/EPA study  is  to  determine mass emis-
sions  of  particulate,  sulfur dioxides,  and  oxides  of nitrogen.   The con-
tract  specifies a special testing program designed  to measure these para-
meters and relate results to  the  collection efficiency  of the  fabric filter
system.
     The  original work  plan  called for  three  special  tests by SPS.  How-
ever,  the  test  dates  were  altered in  order  to  allow for changes in oper-
ating  conditions and  budget  limitations.  Tests were  conducted  by SPS at
the following times  :
          Phase  I                December 11-15, 1978
          Phase  II                October 8-12,  1979
          Phase III                March  24-25,  1980
          Phase IV                 August 26-29,  1980

     The  contract also called  for three  more specialized tests to be con-
ducted by  an outside  consultant  under  subcontract to SPS.   GCA Corporation
was  selected  to sample  at  five locations   for  the following parameters:
particulate,  C.,-C17 organic  compounds, C.-C..,  organic compounds, C09, 0~,
CO, SO,, S03, N0x,  and particulate particle size  distribution.
     GCA  conducted  their first test in February, 1979.  Results  from this
test  led SPS  and the  EPA  to a  decision to  reduce  this  phase of the test
program  to  only one more test  to be performed as a joint  test by SPS and
GCA.   Furthermore,  the  test  parameters were  reduced to  the  following:
particle  size  distribution  by three methods and SO,,  and  SO., sampling at
three  locations. This series of  tests  was performed in June,  i980.
     Procedures followed during periods of special testing were implemented
by  the Environmental  Group  of the  SPS  System  Laboratory  for collection,
recovery,  and  analysis of  samples  for  the  determination  of particulate,
S02,  NO , and  combustion gases  (0^  and  C02) in flue  gases during special
test  periods.   In  addition,  the System Lao fabricated  certain  pieces of
test   equipment, followed  standard  calibrating  procedures,  and employed
quality  control/quality assurance policies.   The  procedures  for the special
test   program  were  basically the same as EPA Methods 3,  5,  6,  and  7 as
outlined  in  the Federal Register  (40 CFR 60,  Appendix A).
     A crew of  test personnel  from  SPS power plants was assembled at Har-
rington  Station for the  first  week-long series  of tests.  Approximately 26
stack  sampling  team members participated in the test program.  By taking
samples  at  three locations  rather  than five,  experienced  personnel were
able to work with the  less  experienced  ones.  As  a result, personnel at all
the  sampling locations had some  degree of experience  during  the  remaining
tests.
     Analyses of the  special testing program are shown in  Tables III, IV,
V,  and  VI.   The fundamental  conclusion to be  drawn from  these  results
confirms  that Unit  2 can operate  in  compliance  with  the New  Source Perform-
ance  Standard  of 0.1  lb/10   BTU. The  special  testing  phase of the  SPS/EPA
study  has  been  completed.   A  report  which deals   exclusively  with  this
portion  of  the  program is currently  being prepared.

                            FABRIC EXPERIENCE

     The  Unit  2  fabric  filter  system was originally equipped with  bags  of
fiberglass  with  a  silicone/graphite coating (W.W.  Criswell Style  445-04).
                                  69

-------
               Table III.  Results of Particulate Testing

       Phase I, December 1978
Run
No.
I17
\H
&
East
Inlet
gr/scf
2.28
2.04
1.67
West
Inlet
gr/scf
2.74
2.56
1.63
V
Theoretical-' ,,
Inlet Stack-' .
gr/scf gr/scf lb/10°Btu
2.09
1.96
2.27
.053
.050
.033
.106
.097
.061
Phase II, October 1979
Run
No.
1
2
3
East
Inlet
gr/scf
1.40
1.61
1.61
West
Inlet
gr/scf
1.41
1>415/
.74^
Theo- ,,
retical-
gr/scf
1.79
1.78
1.81

East
Outlet
gr/scf
.014
.014
.027
West
Outlet
gr/scf
.012
.024
.028
Stack ,
gr/scf lb/10°Btu
.010
.011
.011

.020
.021
.022
Phase III, March 1980
1
2
3
4
11
1.43
.97-,,
y
y
1.35
1.14
1.50
1.82
1.95
2.03
2.04
.008
.013
.011
.007
.012
.038
.022
.020
.009
.013
.018
.024
.017^
.024
•032
.044^
       Phase IV, August 1980
Run
No.
1
2
3
East
Inlet
gr/scf
1.64
1.88
1.35
West
Inlet
gr/scf
1.92
1.67
1.44
Theoretical—' Stack ,
gr/scf gr/scf lb/10bBtu
1.99
1.97
1.96
.016
.009
.015
.031
.018
.030
NOTES

 I/  Sootblowing continuously.
 2/  Not sootblowing.
 3/  Assumes 70% fly ash, no consideration for sootblowing.
 4/  The concentrations of particulate obtained from the stack are biased
     high because of a reaction that took place in the unheated Inconel
     probe liner.
 5/  One sample of probe wash was lost during transport from sample site
     to the lab, causing this sample to be biased low.
 6/  Based upon stoichiometric flue gas flow, coal flow, ash analysis;
     70% fly ash generation; and 30% bottom ash and economizer ash gen-
     eration.
 y  No data.
 8/  Not isokinetic.
 9/  Failed leak check test.
1_0/  Based upon stoichiometric flue gas flow, coal flow, coal analysis
     and 70% fly ash generation (dry basis).
                               70

-------
Phase I, December 1978-'
                    Table IV.  Results of NO  Testing

                      I/
Run
No.
1
2
3
East
Inlet
Method 7
.68
.71
.67
East
Outlet
Method 7
.64
.68
.71
West
Inlet
Method 7
.61
.59
.62
West
Outlet
Method 7
.62
.62
.62
Stack
Method 7
.63
.66
.64
NOTES
 I/  NO  sampling was  only performed one time.
      X
                               71

-------
                    Table V.  Results of SO,, Testing

Phase I, December 1978
Run
No.
1
2
3
I/
East
Inlet
Method 6-lb/106Btu


.53
.59
.62
I/
West
Inlet
Method 6-lb/106Btu


.36
.32
.20
21
Stoichiometric-
lb/106Btu Method
.76
.84
.88

Stack
6-lb/10
.73
.78
.84
6Btu

Phase II, October 1979
East
Run Inlet
No. lb/106Btu
1 .71
2 .74
3 .66
West
Inlet
lb/106Btu
•743/
•79I/
.71-'
Theoretical
lb/106Btu
1.03
.95
.99
East
Outlet
lb/106Btu
.70
•793/
.78^
West
Outlet
lb/106 Btu
.76
.82
.78
Stack
lb/106Btu
.79
1.01
.96
Phase III, March 1980
Run
No.
1
2
3
East
Inlet
lb/106Btu
•764/
H
West
Inlet
lb/106Btu
.69
.67
.67
Theoretical
lb/106Btu
.82
.81
.81
East
Outlet
lb/106Btu
.70
.69
.65
West
Outlet
lb/106Btu
.684/
\l
Stack
lb/106Btu
.81
.75
.78
Phase IV, August 1980
Run
No.
1
2
3
East
Inlet
lb/106Btu
.84
.89
.88
West
Inlet
lb/106Btu
.76
.79
.78
Theoretical
lb/106Btu
.96
.94
.96
Stack
lb/106Btu
.84
.95
.83
NOTES

\j  These concentrations are suspected of being low because of the high
    negative pressure pulling the absorbing solutions forward, thereby
    resulting in the absorbed SO,, not being analyzed.
2/  Assumes all sulfur is converted to S0?.
3/  Based upon only one of two samples for this run.
4/  No data.
                                72

-------
Tabla VI. CCA Tsst Results
Test
I, February
1979
Results Of

Run
Ho.
1
2
3
4
5
6


Run
Ho.
2
4
6


Run
Ho.
2
4
6


Run
Ko.
2
4
6
East
Inlet
gr/scf
1.03
0.99
1.34
2.21
1.53
1.36

East
Inlet
lb/106Btu
I/
0.98
1.10

East
Inlet
lb/106Btu
11
0.35
0.63

East
Inlet
ppm
0.27
2.07
2.56
West
Inlet
f?r/scf
1.57
1 68
1.20
1.36
1.02
2.36
Results
Wast
Inlet


Particulate Testing SPA Method 5
East West
Outlet Outlet Stack
gr/scf gr/scf gr/'sicf
C.011 0.019 -f
0.007 0.005 0.009
0.004 0.008 0.003
0.004 0.007 0.012
0.001 0.002 O.OC4
0.005 0.042 0.017
of S02 Testing EPA Method 6
East West
Outlet Outlet
lb/106Btu lb/106Btu lb/106Btu
0.91
0.80
0.61
Results
West
Inlet
0.82 0-95,,
0.94 -'
0.68 0.64
of NO^ Testing EPA Method 7
East West
Outlet Outlet
lb/106Btu lb/10°Btu lb/1068tu
11
0.50
0.53
Results
West
Inlet
ppm
0.79
0.67
1.96
0.60 0.69
0.52 0.53
0.48 0.55
of SO, Testing EPA Method 8
East West
Outlet Outlet Stack
ppm ppm ppm
0.9S 0.72 1-10,/
0.60 0.82 -'
1.81 1.67 1.86

Stack,
lb/10°Btu
i/
0.018
0.016
0.024
0.007
0.034


Stack
lb/106Btsi
1.10.,
'LI
0.74


Stack
lb/106Btu
\l
0.51
0.47







Test II, June 1980
SPS/GCA Joint Test
                     Results of Particulate Testing
East
Run Inlet
So. gr/scf
i y
2 1.92
3 1.38
West
Inlet
gr/scf
2.30
1.86
1.31
Taeo- -'
retical
gr/scf
2.13
2.22
1.95
r

Stack £
gr/scf
.015
.019
.008
Ib/lOTBtu
.032
.037
.016
NOTES
I/  No data this run.
2/  Invalid test.
Til  Based upon stoichiometric flue gas fiow, coal flow,  coal analysis
    and 70% fly ash eenerstion (dry basis).
                                 73

-------
After the  first several  months  of operation  it became  apparent that the
original choice of fabric was not going to give the expected pressure drop.
Several more  months of  operation  also made  it clear  that  the fabric was
experiencing a high rate of failure.
     Failure of the  original  fabric made it necessary for SPS to engage in
a  fabric  filter evaluation program in order  to find  a  fabric that would
give  satisfactory  performance.   A  review of SPS's  experience with fabric
testing and analysis  of those tests is presented  in a recent paper titled
"SPS Experience With Fabric Filtration" (4).
     In May,  1979, a decision was  made to rebag the  entire fabric filter
system before  the  summer peak load.  Not only was the pressure drop exces-
sive, but the original bags had a high failure rate, and SPS could not risk
curtailing generating capacity because of the fabric filter system.
     The  Unit 2 baghouse was rebagged  in June,  1979.   Most of  the  com-
partments  were  equipped  with  fiberglass  bags  finished  with  10  percent
Teflon  (Criswell Style  442-57DC2)  or  another fiberglass bag  coated with a
proprietary finish (Criswell Style 449-1580).   Selection of  these cloths
was based on an evaluation of test compartments 21 and 23 which were rebag-
ged  in  January, 1979.   SPS  will continue to document  its  experience  with
fabric  wear and  share  its  findings   with other  utilities  interested  in
filtration technology.
                               CONCLUSION

     Despite first-time  difficulties with operating and maintenance param-
eters, SPS is pleased with the overall performance of the Harrington Unit 2
baghouse.   The EPA  study allowed  SPS  to focus on problems unique  to  a
baghouse  as large  and  with as  many  variables  as  the one  at Harrington.
     Results  of the special  testing  program are significant  in that  they
show  Unit 2 can  operate consistently with the  old  New Source Performance
Standard  (0.1  Ib  /10   BTU).   However,  the applicability  of  using SPS's
experience  to  set industry-wide standards  may be  questioned  because  of
SPS's  unique   fabric  experience, cleaning problems,  and  less  than ideal
sampling  locations.   Improvements   in  particulate  removal will  need, to  be
made  before Harrington's  Unit  2  can  consistently  meet  .03  lb/10   BTU,
although  the   data SPS  collected  during  its  special  testing  program  is
consistent with Unit 2 operating conditions.
     SPS will  continue  to monitor  the performance of  the  baghouse for the
next  four years.   In addition,  an  economic analysis  will  be performed and
fabric  studies will  be  conducted  in  an EPA-sponsored pilot  baghouse  on
stream with Harrington Unit 2.

                                ENDNOTES

1.   Ladd,  K.L.,   Faulkner,  G.R.,  and  Kunka,  S.L.,  "Fabric  Filter System
     Study:   First Annual Report," EPA-600/7-79-183, August 1979-
2.   Ladd,  K.L.,   Chambers,  R.L.,   Plunk,  O.C.,  and Kunka,  S.L.,  "Fabric
     Filter System Study:  Second Annual Report,"  Contract No. 68-02-2659,
     August 1980-
3.   Faulkner,  G.R.,  Ladd,   K.L.,  "Start-up,   Operation  and  Performance
     Testing  of Fabric  Filter  System,"   3rd International  Fabric Filter
     Forum,  Phoenix, Arizona, September 1978.
4.   Chambers,  R.L.,  Ladd,  K.L.,   and Kunka,  S.L., "SPS Experience  With
     Fabric Filtration," 5th International  Fabric Filter Forum, Phoenix,
     Arizona,  January 1981.         -

-------
                A SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE TESTING
                OF THE APITRON ELECTROSTATICALLY
                    AUGMENTED FABRIC FILTER	

                               by
                        Dennis Helfritch
                              and
                         Lotar Kirsten

                      AIR QUALITY DIVISION
              AMERICAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        Charlotte, N.C.
ABSTRACT
The Apitron filter is currently the only commercially operating
electrostatically augmented fabric filter.  As such it has been
intensively investigated by industry and governmental agencies
over the past several years.  A large amount of performance
data has been gathered.  Following a brief description of
Apitron operating principles, this data is reviewed and
compared for consistency.  General conclusions are drawn from
the data regarding performance improvements which result from
electrostatic augmentation.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years a considerable amount of interest has been
directed toward augmenting the filtration process by means of
electrostatics.  Many researchers have been actively engaged in
theoretical and experimental aspects of electrostatic
filtration, and funding for this type of research has
increased dramatically.  A recent symposium sponsored by the
Fiber Society and the Filtration Society was devoted entirely
to this subject.1    The reasons for the interest in
electrostatic filtration center about the potential of these
techniques to reduce energy usage and increase submicron
collection efficiency.

There are several techniques by which electrostatics can be
applied to filtration.  Particles or fibers or both may be
charged, and electrostatic fields may be applied in different
ways.  These techniques and several combinations have all been
attempted, and the interesting result is that they all improve
filtration performance.

                              75

-------
Almost all of the work, both theoretical and experimental,  that
has been done in this field so far has been in the area of
basic studies.  Modeling work, involving single and multiple
fibers and particle trajectories under the influence of various
electrostatic forces has been done.  Experimental work,
primarily with bench scale equipment and patch filters, has been
done.  While this work is essential and provides a base for
future work, the results so far achieved cannot be used to
predict the performance of commercial units, which are operated
continuously for periods of years, during which the fabric is
frequently pulsed, shaken or flexed.  Because of this, the
field testing of commercial and pilot scale Apitron units can
yield valuable information.
                                 Figure 1

The Apitron electrostatically aug-
mented fabric charges particles
prior to their filtration by
conventional bags.  As shown in
Figure 1, incoming airflow enters
the charging section in the area
below the walkway.  The flow then
passes upward through the tubes,
where the particulate is charged
and where some is deposited.  Flow
continues upward past the tubes,
into and through the bags,  where
the final filtration of the charged
particulate takes place.  Clean
air exits the unit at the
exhaust, located at the top of the
baghousing section.
Periodically, the deposit of particulate is cleaned from the
tube and fabric.  Six bags and tubes are cleaned of deposited
dust at one time.  This cleaning is initiated when an
electrical pulse from the control box opens one of the twelve
diaphragm valves for 1/10 second.  Compressed air jets
downward from six nozzles, each directly above a tube and
concentric to a discharge electrode.  The jet of air flowing
downward through the tube entrains and mixes with a secondary
air flow, and the collector tube is swept clean of deposited
dust by the mixture of high velocity air.  The secondary
airflow, passing from the outside to the inside of the bag,
snaps the bag inward and dislodges dust deposit from it, see
figure 2.
                             76

-------
                 Figure 2
THREE TEST PROGRAMS
Most test programs involving novel devices seek to document the
efficiency and energy consumption of the device and then
compare these results with  those previously obtained for
conventional devices.  These comparisons are usually hindered by
the fact that the conditions under which the two devices had
been tested are invariably  somewhat different.  Completely
valid comparisons can only  be made when the two devices are
simultaneously tested under identical conditions.  The testing
of electrostatically augmented filtration devices, however,
offers the opportunity to switch off the electrostatics and
hence tests the device as a conventional filter.  This type of
test minimizes the problem  of comparisons.
We will therefore be primarily concerned with Apitron testing
in which data was taken with and without electrostatic
augmentation, and we will not make a strong attempt to compare
Apitron performance with that of conventional fabric filters.

The Apitron has been tested by several industrial and
governmental agencies, as well as its manufacturer and users.
All testing has included data concerning collection efficiency
and pressure drop, and data has only been recorded after
several hundred hours of continuous operation. We will review
three of these test programs individually.

AMERICAN FOUNDRYMEN'S SOCIETY

The object of this study 2 was to identify control devices
which would be suitable for use in foundry process air
recirculation.  The foundry cleaning room was used as a
potential recirculation application, and five conventional
baghouses were efficiency tested as controls.  Subsequently,
several pilot scale model devices, including the Apitron, were
then efficiency tested on the cleaning room exhaust of the
General Motors Central Foundry.  The inlet particulate was
900mg/m3 of mostly iron oxide and silica, with a mass mean
diameter of 3 microns. Only total particulate efficiency
testing was done, and only  for the electrostatically augmented
case.  The air cloth ratio was 5 CFM/sq. ft. and bag cleaning
was off line, once every two hours.  The results are show in
Table 1.
                               77

-------
                    Table 1
             AMERICAN FOUNDRYI«EN'S SOCIETY
             Recirculation -Test Results
EPA
Best AFS Baghouse

Worst AFS Baghouse

Average AFS Baghouse (5 tested)

Required for Recirculation

Apitron (OHS #1)

Apitron (OHS #2)
Inlet,
(MG/l-r)
 1049

 1714

 1755

 1755

 1054

 743
                                           Outlet
                                             >
                                   Effici-
                                   ency
66.1

39.7

 1.5

 .19

 .11
96.14

97.75

29.91

99.982

99.985
In  1978 a full  scale Apitron module  was tested under the EPA
novel devices evaluation  program 3.   13 x 10*  mg/m3 of
redispersed  silica dust with a mass  mean diameter of 25  microns
was filtered at a 6 CFM/sq.  ft. air  cloth ratio.   Bag cleaning
was on line, each bag cleaned every  eight minutes.  Fractional
efficiencies and pressure drops were measured  for operation
with and without electrostatic augmentation.   A chronological
view of the  testing is shown in Figure 3.  In  this Figure the
application  of  particle charging is  given in terms of corona
power (voltage  x current),  and obviously no particle charging
occurs at zero  corona power.  The effect of particle charging
on  penetration  and pressure  drop can be easily seen.
         Outlet
         Participate
         MG/M3
         Corona
         Power
         Watt/CFM
Figure 3
                  1.5
   1.0
                  .5
                 1.0
                  .5 .
         Pres sure
         Drop
         Inches Water
   10

    6
                  2 .
                                                    I     I
                    '1600
                          1700
                               1800
                                    1900
                                         2000
                                             2100
                                                  2200
                                                        2300
                        Hours Continuous Operation
Figure 4 shows  typical  fractional efficiency  curves for  this
application for filtration with and  without electrostatic
augmentation.   It can be  seen from these curves  that,  for this
particular test,  electrostatics exerts a stronger influence on
larger particles  than on  smaller particles, there being  an
order  of magnitude difference in penetration  at  4 microns, but
only a factor of  two at 0.4 microns.
                                 78

-------
             Figure 4
NIOSH
                            rticle Size, Mic
As with the American Foundrymen's Society, the object of this
study was to  identify control devices which would be suitable
for plant air recirculation applications.  Several pilot scale
devices, including the Apitron, were efficiency tested on a
weld shop ventilation system.  The inlet particulate was 12
mg/m3 of welding fume, with a mass mean diameter of .65
microns.  Bag cleaning was off-line, once every eight hours,
and air cloth ratio was 6.5 CFM/sq. ft.  The results of
fractional efficiency testing is shown in Figure 5.  In this
case, in contrast to the EPA tests, electrostatics has the
largest influence on small diameter particles.
             Figure 5
                                   Without
                                   Particle
                                   Charging
                         With
                         Particle
                          Charging
SUMMARY OF  RESULTS
At this point  we wish to formulate some general statements
concerning  electrostatically augmented fabric filtration, based
upon the results of the work reviewed above.   There are
several similarities and several differences among the
operational parameters of the three test programs.  Gas
temperature for all tests was ambient (about 70 F.).  The
filtration  fabric for all tests was 11 ounce/sq. yd.
polyester felt, and the corona power level for all tests was
between .23 and .29 watts per CFM.  Basic differences from test
to test was of course the amount and the size distribution of
the inlet particulate, and the type of bag cleaning (on vs. off
line).
                               79

-------
Table 2 summarizes the  test parameters  and results.   The
independent variables of the Table are  essentially the  inlet
concentration and mass  mean particle diameter, and the  dependent
variables are penetration and filter drag.  Corona power and
air  cloth ratio do not  vary in a significant way and  can be
considered fixed variables.  In order to  assess the influence
of the independent variables on performance, graphs were
constructed of each  dependent variable  versus each independent
variable.  The only  paring which produced a physically
meaningful result was that of % penetration versus mass mean
diameter.  This is shown in Figure 6, and the strong  effect of
particle size on penetration is obvious.        Figure 6
                 Table 2
                SUMMARY OF RESULTS
                                           10"
Test Corona Pwr.   Inlet  Particle MMD   ACR   Penetration    Drag     °
   (watt/CFM)  (Mg/m3)   (micron)   (CFM/ft2)   (*)    ("H20/FPM)    •£  -1
                            .017
                                   .16

                                   .52
.29

 0
          12.7 x 10*
5.8

5.0
1.3 X 10"'

3.8 x 10
                               "3
 .48

1.72

NIOSH

.23
12.4
0
6.5
.65
6.5
.30

.90
1.54

2.54
                                           10
 CONCLUSIONS
                                       .1      1      10      100


                                            Mass Mean Diameter. Microns
 Table 3 summarizes the effect on performance caused  by the
 utilization of  electrostatics, where  the penetration and filter
 drag results  are given in terms of  the ratio of their values
 obtained with and without electrostatics.  Considering that
 three substantially different applications were used as a
 source of  inlet particulate, the degree of performance
 enhancement brought about by particle precharging  is remarkably
 consistent.   From Table 3 we can say  that electrostatic
 augmentation  by means of particle charging prior to  filtration
 yields approximately a threefold decrease in penetration and a
 twofold decrease in filter drag.
                Table 3  EFFECT OF PARTICLE CHARGING
      Test
             % Penetration
             Elect/non-elect
              Filter Drag
              Elect/non-elect
AFS
EPA
NIOSH
	
.34
.33
.31
.28
.61
      AVE.
                 .34
                  .40
                                80

-------
It should be remembered that these conclusions are derived from
& varied, but extremely small data base.  They are meant only
to be qualitative guidelines as  to what can be expected from
electrostatic augmentation.  In  addition, these conclusions can
only apply to the case of  charged particles, and the
application of electrostatic fields  to filtration cannot be
expected to produce similar results.

On the other hand, the results given are  currently the only
available results for long term  operation of a commercial scale
electrostatically augmented fabric filter.  As such, the
results  can provide valuable insights to  this emerging
technology.

ENDNOTES

1)   E.R. Frederick, "Fibers, Electrostatics, and Filtration: A
     Review of New Technology,  "JAPCA, Vol.  30, No. 4,pp.426-
     431.

2)   R. W. Potokar,  "Foundry Process  Air Recirculation, " JAPCA,
     Vol. 29, No.  1, pp  18-21.

 3)   L. G. Felix and J.  D.  McCain,  "Apitron  Electrostatically
     Augmented Fabric  Filter Evaluation,  "EPA-600/7-79-070.

 4)   M. L. Holcomb  and R.  C. Scholz,  "Recirculation of
     Industrial  Exhaust Air Pilot Study,  "To be published by
     NIOSH.
                               81

-------
                     FABRIC FILTER OPERATING EXPERIENCE
                      FROM SEVERAL MAJOR UTILITY UNITS

                By:  Owen F.  Fortune

                     Richard L. Miller

                     Eric A.  Samuel
                     Buell Emission Control Division
                     Envirotech Corporation
                     Lebanon, Pennsylvania  17042

                                   ABSTRACT

      This paper presents the field operating experience from several major
 utility units.  Reverse air  fabric filter units  operating experience from
 pulverized coal and cyclone-type boilers  are presented.   Startup experience
 with different firing techniques (coal, oil assist,  gas)  are presented.
 Field pressure drop data are correlated with a model.   This  field correlation
 demonstrates the dependence  of pressure drop with  the  flyash particle size
 distribution, grain loading  density,  cleaning, and air-to-cloth ratio.   This
 model explains the high pressure drop experienced  by some units on lignite
 coal.  Flyash particle size  distributions from various  compartments and
 within compartment are compared for a few units  to investigate  the industry's
 conjecture of variable particle size  to different  compartments.

                                 INTRODUCTION

      The successful use of baghouses  in minimizing particulate  emissions  from
 coal-burning power plants is  now in its seventh  year.  Yet,  there  is  still
 debate over what  factors are  important in successfully designing and  operat-
 ing  a utility baghouse.  The  purpose  of this paper is to  recount the  opera-
 tional factors that Buell has found to be important, and  some of the  conclu-
 sions that  we have drawn from our  experience and mathematical modeling work.

                     BAGHOUSE DUST AND GAS DISTRIBUTION

      Much has been written (1,  2) about the problems of obtaining an  even
 distribution amongst both the  compartments and the bags of a large baghouse.
 This  debate has gone on  in spite of the fact that, unlike an electrostatic
 precipitator,  the  pressure drop across the cleaning elements is much  greater
 (2 to  4" W.G.)  than the  velocity head of  the dusty gas (typically 1/2" W.G.
 in the inlet  manifold).  Thus,  if initially one area of the compartment has a
 thinner filter  cake on the bags than in the rest of the compartment,  the flow
 to that area  will  increase,  and soon cause the filter cake in this area to
 increase more rapidly than in the rest of the compartment.  Soon, cake thick-
ness and bag  gas flows will equalize throughout the compartment.

     Our experience has been that obtaining equitable dust/gas distribution
is a relatively easy thing to do, provided that four simple rules are
followed:
                                      82

-------
  A. Tap off from only the bottom -  or  at  lea«t. n«   ^  u
     manifold,                         r  at  ieast near the bottom, of the  inlet
  B.  Taper the inlet  manifold so that rou»hlv M,
     tained along  its length,             ^ the Same §as velocity is maln_
  C.  Be sure that  the hydraulic diameter  nf  ^
     small relative to the local h^aulic dia .^f ^ lnlet Valves is
  D.  Decelerate the gas and dust Sterin* the b T    the talet -^"oW, and
     leaving it, in easy,  gradual stages       baShouse> and accelerate the gas
      (A) is  important because hori^rmi-ai  A  *
often long enough (several hundred   eet  to^ermit th/l*
30 microns)  dust  particles to settle towards til 1        ^  (§reater than
Tapering the floor - rather than th* ^°Wfds *he lower P^rt of the duct.
off the manifold's up£r potion  practical^ '
heavier dust particles will be s^pt to tS L
                                   P     the most
                      es w      e  spt to t                             '
 compartments.                       P     the most d°wnstream baghouse's


















 500  fn« wM?     ^ 8  "f  thr°Ugh the ±nlet ValV6S and then to  the  order  of
 500  fpm while passing under  the  bags.  Fine-tuning the details  of the  ho^er

 Sudf (3)!S the m°St imP°rtant reaS°n beh±nd doln^ a ba^— geometric model
    The importance  of Items (C) and  (D) is  illustrated in Table 1   In an

   *      •      t7bagh     handlln§ 38°'°00 ACM'  inlet
for a velo  •     fH                      '         '       Vaves -re a
for a velocity  of about 1000 fpm, while later designs have valve entrance
design velocities between 2000 and  2500 fpm.   In the former case, a coarser
dust was found  in the filter cake of bags in  the upstream compartment  indi-
cating a mildly uneven dust distribution along the baghouse length.  For the
high-speed inlet  valve design, there is  no  significant difference in filter-
cafce mean particle size between compartments.
                     TABLE 1 - BAG FILTERCAKE, MEAN PARTICLE SIZE (HICRONS)
                      380,000 ACFM BAGHOUSE
                      "LOW VELOCITY INLET VALVES"
               UPSTREAM COMPARTMENTS:      10.3
               MIDDLE COMPARTMENTS:        7.4
               DOWNSTREAM COMPARTMENTS:     7.0
                                       83
                                               600,000 ACFM BAGHOUSE
                                               "HIGH VELOCITY INLET VALVES"
                                                   6.0
                                                 6.1
                                                 5.9

-------
     Two other dust distribution  questions are whether coarser dust winds  up
going up to the bags on one  side  of  a  compartment,  and finer dust to the  bags
at the other end, and whether  the filtercake at the bottom of a bag has
coarser dust than the filtercake  at  the top of the  bag.  Buell's experience
- as illustrated in Figure 1 - is that with properly designed inlet valves
and hopper flow control devices,  there is  NO noticeable particle size
gradient in a baghouse compartment (4).
                                      30'
                                  FIGURE  I
                   Compartment Filtercake Mean Particle Size
                         Dust Distribution  (Microns)

     Using Stokes Law, the maximum terminal velocity  for a falling particle
in a gas flow can easily be computed:

Maximum Drop Velocity  (fpm) = 7.2 X 10
                                       6  (dust
                                          (gas  density)   I size (micronsj
     For a 35' long, 12" diameter bag, the bulk velocity through the entrance
thimble is of the order of 250 fpm.  Thus, for  30 micron particles, only the
top 6% of the bag would have a noticeably coarser  dust.   These theoretical
considerations are in agreement with our field experience:

                TABLE II - VERTICAL BAG __FI LTERCAKE MEAN PARTICLE SIZE

                               01.5" 0 x 34 '-8" L. BAG)

                                           SI a (MICRONS!

                               TOP       -      5.2

                               MIDDLE     -      5.2

                               BOTTOM     -      5.0

                        BAG  CLEANING DESIGN  PHILOSOPHY


     Once the dust  and  gas have  been evenly  brought to the thousands of bags
in a baghouse, the  next  design consideration is how to set up the bag  clean-
ing system.  Two  important factors  to  consider  are:
                                      84

-------
A.  Optimum Number of  Compartments

         Typically,  this  is in the range of 8 to 16 compartments per collector,
    with the average being 10 to 12.  This results because:

    1.  Having too few compartments causes large pressure drop spikes as a
        result of taking  too large a percentage of cloth off line during
        cleaning, while

    2.  using too many compartments can cause the time-averaged baghouse
        pressure drop  to  be high due to the fact that it will take hours to
        properly clean down all the compartments.  This forces you into a
        continuous cleaning mode just to maintain reasonable pressure drops
        (i.e.,  if you  initiate cleaning at 4.5" W.G., by the time you cleaned
        all the  compartments, it would be time to start all over again).
        Continuous cleaning does not allow any margin of safety in case of
        upset conditions, such as a wet coal pile, high ash coal, boiler tube
        leaks,  etc.

 B.  Optimum Number of  Bags per Compartment

        As shown in  Figure 2, the current trend in reverse air cleaned bag-
    houses is towards  more and more bags per compartment.  Since it is rela-
    tively easy  to  get good dust and gas distribution in large compartments,
    the limiting factors on compartment size become  (1) how long it will take
    to  install  a new set of bags, and (2) at what point does the width and
    depth of  the compartment result in a hopper whose height and weight is
    excessive.
                       5MV-
                       500-
                       450-
                       400-
                       300-
                       ?50-
                 FIGURE 2
                              —I—
                              WR
	1	
 1Q71
1QBO   19S11   1W
   OPriWIONM VFAR
               19R3
                                         85

-------
        A three-man crew working in a reasonably cool  (80 to 100PF) compart-
    ment can be expected to handle (remove old bags, install new bags, care-
    fully check bag tensioning) about 50 bags in an eight-hour shift.  Thus,
    a well ventilated compartment with three sets (tubesheet and bag top) of
    walkways could contain up to 450 bags and still be rebagged by nine men
    in three shifts.  Similarly, it is logical to have as many as 600 bags in
    a compartment with four sets of doors.

                        REVERSE AIR CLEANING SYSTEM

How Not to Clean Bags

a.  Using excessively high velocity reverse air flows, which can damage the
    bags by overflexing them.
b.  Using cold reverse air (gas) can cause sub-dewpoint conditions in the
    compartment, resulting in an acid rain on the bags.  This will result in
    high pressure drops and reduced Bag life.
c.  Too frequent cleaning of the filter cake exposes the fabric interstices.
    This causes "puffing" and opacity excursions due to particle migration
    through the fabric.

Proper Design Practice

a.  Reverse air capacity at between 1-1/2 to 2 ACFM/FT^ of active cloth per
    compartment.  Buell typically designs for a ratio of 1,75:1 with at least
    a 14" W.G. capacity fan to provide the margin of safety needed in the
    cleaning system to handle conditions of high moisture, high dust loadings,
    sticky cake, etc., which can occasionally occur.
b.  Slowly repressurizing a compartment after cleaning ensures that ,the bags
    will not suddenly reinflate ("pop") when the compartment is brought back
    into service after cleaning.
c.  Maintaining reverse air relief flow at low levels (20% of design)  at all
    times to keep reverse air ducts hot.  This avoids sub-dewpoint reverse air
    temperatures and, hence, the spraying of acid rain on the bags during
    cleaning.

Cleaning Cycle Philosophy

     The two common strategies used in cleaning reverse air baghouses are
"Batch" cleaning and "continuous" cleaning.   Batch Cleaning is initiated when
the baghouse flange-to-flange pressure loss reaches a given level.  All the
compartments are cleaned in rapid sequence,  and then left on line luntil the
baghouse pressure loss again builds up to the trigger point.  Continuous
cleaning has the compartments cleaned on a rigid time schedule, regardless of
the baghouse pressure drop.  The advantages to batch cleaning are that the
time-averaged baghouse pressure loss (and ID fan power consumption) is mini-
mized.  Continuous cleaning, however, avoids the brief (a few minutes) pressure
spike that occurs when the first dirty compartment of the batch is cleaned.

Maximum Baghouse Pressure Drops

     A considerable number of baghouse mathematical simulation models (5, 6,

                                      86

-------
 Lrlt-! £r  SVrP°8ed recently  to  try to explain why one baghouse will
 operate with a 5" W.G. pressure  loss  while another struggles with an 11" W.G,
 loss.^  Buell s experience is that  a relatively simple extension of the
 classic Carman-Kozeny model, coupled  with an elementary knowledge of boiler
 type (cyclone, tangential fired, etc.) and the expected coal and ash proper-
                  ft
               LJ
               CO
               §'
               CD
               CO
               CO
               O
                    	i_
                       OPERATING CONDITIONS /-EXPECTED MAXIMUM
                          285°r          4  8AGHOUSEPRESSURE
                          5.9GRAINS/ACF     LOSS IS  7V  !N.W.G,
               -5'/8 IN.W.G,
                TIME-AVERAGED
                PRESSURE LOSS
PRESSURE LOSS
— W CM
PREDICTED BAGHOUSE OPERATING
HISTORY WITH ONE COMPARTMENT
— OFF-LINE FOR MAINTENANCE AND
ONE COMPARTMENT AT A TIME
BEING CLEANED.
1
0 1/2 1 11/2
1
2
                                  TIME (HOURS)
                  o '—
                 FIGURE 3

 ties are  sufficient to yield a realistic forecast of what air-to-cloth ratios
 are needed  to  meet  a given maximum draft loss specification.  The model Buell
 uses was  adapted by T. Bechtel and 0. Fortune from the Carman-Kozeny model.
 The C-K model  was rewritten in terms of the important physical phenomena:
where
AP

Ap
 A
 t
 D
   A +
                         A2 t D
(eq.  2)
draft loss across filter  cake  ("W.G.)
air-to-cloth ratio  (fpm)
time required for a complete cleaning  cycle (hours)
flyash flow rate into the baghouse  (gr/acf)
     Since the field data  used to  establish k^ and k2 would be gathered from
plants at different altitudes  (and atmospheric pressures) and with different
                                        87

-------
baghouse gas densities and temperatures, reference terms were added to the
model to account for this:
      Ap = ktA + k2A2 t D          f = kjA + k3A2 t           (eq. 3)
where H = atmospheric pressure at plant site ("Hg)
      T = gas temperature (°Rankine = °F + 460°)
      r = reference quantity

     Since baghouse pressure drops have always been high for metallurgical
applications involving submicron particles, and low for cement plant appli-
cations with coarse duct (greater than 30 microns), plotting data for a
variety of industrial and utility applications leads to the conclusion that:

              AP  o<  d ~°'8                                   (eq- 4)

where:  d = dust mean particle size (microns)

     Buell's flyash pilot baghouse testing ( 8 ) later roughly confirmed this
deduction by finding
     Thus, our model became            n R
                                       u. o
          AT,   1   A   ,   *2    DH  fdr\       .   .  ,  .   Az t DH  (eq. 5)
          AP = k, A + k- A  t  —  (T/     = k, A + k/, 	    M
     Buell has-found that this relatively simple model is a good pressure drop
prediction forecaster and also helps explain the high pressure drop problems
at installations such as TUSI Monticello and SWEPCO Harrington.  The results
of a parameter study using the Bechtel-Fortune model are shown in Figure 4.
The results agree with the conclusion of the flyash baghouse survey of Noll
and Patel (7); that provided the air-to-cloth ratio is under 2:1, baghouse
pressure loss is not a problem for utility applications.

                          BAGS, COATINGS AND WEAR

A.  The vast majority of current utility boiler filter bags are made of
    fiberglass cloth.  The only other present candidate fabrics are Nomex
    and acrylics.  Both of these materials are seldom used because:

    1.  The maximum continuous temperature allowed with acrylics is 265°F.
        While some boilers do operate in this temperature range, it does not
        allow any room for excursions, and could lead to having to reduce
        load on hot summer days to protect the bags.

    2.  Nomex has a temperature limitation of 4009F and has poor resistance
        to acids.  With some special finishes currently available, a maximum
        of 1-1/2% sulfur exposure is allowable but field data is minimal.
        Also, Nomex is approximately 50% more expensive than fiberglass.
                                      88

-------
             FIGURE 4
                               SET GAS-TO-CLOTH 5ATIO
                                  (AC7M/FT2)
    Thus, the final  decision regarding the bag material will usually boil
    down to what weight  of fiberglass cloth to use (9-1/2 oz./yd.^ versus
    13-1/2 oz./yd^)and what type of coating (Teflon B or acid resistant) to
    apply to the untreated fiberglass.  Buell's standard practice is to
    prolong bag life by  using 13-1/2 oz./yd^ cloth where the design coals
    have high ash contents (i.e.,  over 15%), high sulfur contents (i.e., over
    1-1/2%), or operating temperatures near the dewpoint.  The more flexible
    9-1/2 oz./yd2 cloth  is used for less vigorous, base loaded systems where
    we can take advantage of its greater flexibility and lower capital cost.

B.  Fabric Protective Coatings

    Fiberglass cloth ("Greige Goods") must receive proper chemical treatments
    (1) to protect the glass fibers from both acid and alkali attack, (2) to
    lubricate the fibers  and thus  improve abrasion resistance and flex endur-
    ance, and (3) to enhance its particulate release properties (allowing
    easier clean down and hence lower pressure drops).  The_two most_commonly
    ..	3	*._•„	_ _ m^jTi	 Tt  ~.«.j 4-v.A rt«_rtrtii/-\^  cicicl"—ITGS is 13nt  f in is IIGS
used coatings are  Teflon B, and the so-called
                                  89

-------
    (i.e., Q78, Acid Flex, Chemflex, etc.).  The latter consist of silicon,
    graphite, teflon, and organic resins.   While Teflon B does offer excel-
    lent lubrication and release properties, it does not offer the high
    degree of acid resistance needed with (1) high sulfur coals, (2) lower
    operating temperature, and (3) cyclic boiler operation.  This is due to
    the fact that the various "acid-resistant" coatings encapsulate over two-
    thirds of the glass filaments, while a pure Teflon B coating encapsulates
    over one-third.

C.  Bag Tensioning and Ring Spacing

    1.  Filter bags must be kept taut enough to ensure that the bags will not
        "pancake" together during cleaning; thus,  both trapping dust and
        abrading the bag material, and slack enough so that their flexing
        during cleaning will remove at least half  of the dust cake.   This is
        achieved by sewing horizontal steel rings  into the bags.  Using cable
        theory, it can be calculated that  the optimal ring spacing is a vari-
        able pattern (2 diameters at the bottom to a maximum of 4-1/2 dia-
        meters at the top) which provides  a more uniform fabric flex angle
        along the bag.  This reduces the chance of having localized  flexure
        failure, particularly at the bottom of the bag.

    2.  Premature bag failure can be caused by both too little and too much
        tension (.10) .  Recommended bag tension is  approximately 50#  for 8"
        diameter bags, and 75# for 12" diameter bags.

        Tensioning of the bags in a compartment has some similarity  to tuning
        a piano.  Start from the outside edges of  the compartments and work
        toward the middle.  Then wait a day or two and re-tune.  After a few
        months on line, the bags should be re-checked for slackness  due to
        creep-relaxat ion.

D.  Quality Assurance and Quality Control  for Bag  Manufacture

    To get high reliability out of bags calls for  a firm QA/QC program.  A
    good program (3) provides the baghouse supplier with the ability  to trace
    all raw materials used during manufacture back to the original supplier,
    and due to various inspections and certifications, also ensures  that
    these raw materials meet the specifications as required by the customer.
    Buell's experience is that good QA/QC  procedures mean the difference
    between having on-site bag rejection rates of  less than 1%, as opposed to
    as high as 20%, when a QA program was  not carried out.

E.  Bag Maintenance and Inspection

    Periodic inspection and maintenance of bags is essential to prolong bag
    life.  To provide a safe and workable  environment, the following are
    desirable:

    1.  Compartment ventilation system is  needed to cool internal compartment
        temperatures to approximately 20°F above ambient.  Often the most


                                      90

-------
        economical system is a combination of partial internal insulation and
        partial ventilation.  Without this type of workable environment, the
        most  one can expect of a man working in a HOT compartment is about 15
        minutes inside, 20 minutes outside.  Poor maintenance conditions will
        in the long run cause a reduction in bag care (i.e., bags near the
        hot wall not properly tensioned).

    2.   Doorway ventilation velocities under 1000 fpm. with maximum door open-
        ing being no wider than the lower walkways to avoid exposing the bags.

    3.   Opacity monitoring is a good method of checking for damaged bags.  By
        cross-checking any opacity spikes with the cleaning cycle, one can
        identify the compartment with damaged bags.

                           PREPARATION FOR OUTAGES

For short outages (under two days) , the  baghouse can be bottled up if it has
(1) good insulation (3" of mineral wool  at least), and (2) the hopper heaters
are left on.   For long outages, the bags should be cleaned down at least 1/2
dozen times before the unit is brought off-line.

       BAGHOUSE OPERATION DURING BOILER  START-UP AND UPSET CONDITIONS

1.  Start-Ups - Using Oil and Natural Gas

    It is necessary to prevent the aromatic compounds formed during incomplete
    combustion of oil from entering the  filter cake.  So the baghouse is
    bypassed when burning either 100% oil or gas, until (a) baghouse internals
    are over 200°F, and  (b) several coal mills are in operation.

    Using a total liquids trap in  the natural gas supply line to remove impur-
    ities helps minimize the problem in  plants using gas fire-up.

2.  Bypass Switchover Temperature

    This is essentially a function of coal sulfur content.
                 o.i   o.n    i.t
i.t    M)    *•«
   CtWl SM-flin CWITHIT («)
                                       91

-------
    The minimum operating temperatures shown are typically lower than pure
    gas-liquid 803 dewpoint curves due to the fact that they take into
    consideration the flyash alkali content.

3.  Boiler Tube Leaks

    Should a boiler tube leak occur,  the baghouse chould be bypassed immedi-
    ately to avoid possible damage to the bags.   With superheater tube leaks,
    as long as the baghouse temperature remains  above the new dewpoint temper-
    ature, this small increase in moisture will  not affect the performance of
    the unit.

    If a large tube rupture should occur in the  economizer section of the
    boiler, a large amount of water will enter the baghouse,  leaving a wet,
    muddy cake on the bags.  Immediately, the baghouse should be put through
    5-6 cleaning cycles to clean off as much of  the cake as possible.  Then,
    it should be bypassed and bottled up.  After the damage to the boiler has
    been repaired, bring the baghouse on line on bypass until the bags can be
    dried out.

4.  Air Heater Stoppages

    This is not a problem for a baghouse, since  you have about 5 minutes to
    bypass the baghouse before the temperature spike hits the bags, and the
    baghouse steel takes hours to heat up to over 500°F.

    To avoid boiler upsets, the design bypass /!pshould be equal to average
    baghouse Ap.  This means velocities in the range .of 5,000 to 7,000 fpm
    through the bypass valves.

                                CONCLUSIONS

     We have attempted to show in this paper that by paying attention to a
relatively small number of design parameters (dust loading,  mean particle size,
gas density, coal sulfur content) it is easy to  rationally size a baghouse to
operate with minimal, maximum and average draft  losses.   Then, given proper
attention to bag manufacture and tensioning, the baghouse will perform success-
fully.

                                  REFERENCES

1.  P. R. Belkus.  Dust and Flow Distribution on a 10 MW Unit.  Fifth Inter-
    national Fabric Alternatives Forum, Phoenix,  Arizona.

2.  P. Bowen.  Fabric Filter Model Studies Update.  Fifth International Fabric
    Alternatives Forum, Phoenix, Arizona.

3.  J. A. Hudson, et. al.  Design and Construction of Baghouses for Shawnee
    Steam Plant.  Second Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization of Particu-
    late Control Technology,  July, 1979.
                                      92

-------
4.  W. Van Kleunen.  Particulate Distribution Within TVA Shawnee Baghouses,
    ECD Ref.: 27475/S.O.  8898, January, 1981

5.  R. Dennis, H. A. Klemm.  A model  for Coal Flyash Filtration,  Journal Air
    Pollution Control Association  29:230 (1979).

6.  J. R. Koscianowski,  et.  al.  Filtration Parameters for Dust Cleaning
    Fabrics.  EPA-600/7-79-031.  January,  1979-

7.  K. E. Noll, M.  Patel.  Evaluation of Performance Data From Fabric Filter
    Collectors on Coal Fired Boilers.  Filtration and Separation,  May, 1979.

8.  E. A. Samuel.   Research and Development of Test Baghouse at Martin Drake
    No.  6,  City of  Colorado Springs Mathematical Modeling Studies, December,
    1979.

9.  F. A. Horney.   Coal  Ash Characteristics:  Do They Allow Predictability of
    Fabric  Filter Performance.  Fourth International Fabric Alternatives
    Forum,  Phoenix, Arizona.

10. P. R. Campbell.  Make fiberglass  Bags  Last Longer by Maintaining Proper
    Tension. Power. March, 1980.

11. E. W. Stenby,  F. A.  Horney,  R. W. Scheck, D. M. Shattuck.  Minimizing
    Boiler/Baghouse Impact.  Power.  December, 1979.
                                        93

-------
               EVALUATION OF THE 25 MW KRAMER STATION BAGHOUSE:
                        TRACE ELEMENT EMISSION CONTROL

                                      By

                                 M. W. McElroy
                                  R. C. Carr

                       Electric Power Research Institute
                             Palo Alto, California

       The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is currently  supporting  a
  major research program characterizing the emission control performance  of
  fabric filter baghouses in coal-fired utility boiler applications.  An
  integral part of this program is the determination of particulate matter
  chemical composition and collection.  One such effort reported  here is  an
  evaluation of the Kramer Station baghouses of the Nebraska Public Power
  District.

       Chemical analysis of particulate matter samples shows that the
  collection efficiency of over 35 individual major and trace elements was
  essentially equivalent to that of total mass.  Size dependent chemical
  analysis results for nearly 30 elements over a 0.05-10 micrometer diameter
  size range further reveals that the vast majority of elements exhibit
  penetration profiles remarkably similar to total mass (Figure 1).  A notable
  exception was selenium, which exhibited much higher penetration.  Inlet size
  distributions indicated fine particle enrichment for several elements
  relative to the matrix elements.  This enrichment behavior was  still evident
  at the outlet of the baghouse (Figure 2), despite very low outlet emissions.
  Typical outlet size distributions are illustrated in Figure 3.  A complete
  discussion and presentation of results are provided in EPRI Report CS-1669,
  "Kramer Station Fabric Filter Evaluation" (January 1981), prepared by
  Meteorology Research, Inc.
Penetration (percent)
100 i	
 10
 0.1
0.01
  0.01
Collection Efficiency (percent)
Selenium
                                       90
                                       99
                                       99.9
                                I  I I I I 11
                                       99.99
              0.1
                                      10
                 Diameter (^m)
Figure 1. PARTICLE SIZE DEPENDENT
ELEMENTAL PENETRATIONS.

     Baghouse penetration profiles
of most elements are contained in
a relatively narrow band and
closely resemble total mass. Thus,
the total mass penetration may be
a useful indicator of elemental
penetrations.  Overall baghouse
collection efficiency was 99.7%  at
the time of these tests. Elements
listed are all those for which
complete inlet/outlet size dis-
tributions were obtained.
                                       94

-------
Enrichment ~
         (M/[Fe))10)U71
                                           Figure 2.  ENRICHMENT OF SELECTED
                                           ELEMENTS AT  BAGHOUSE OUTLET

                                                Enrichment is defined here  as the
                                           concentration  ratio of an element to
                                           iron at a specific particle diameter
                                           divided by the concentration ratio at
                                           a particle diameter of 10 micrometers.
                                           Iron was selected as the reference
                                           element because of the similarity of
                                           its size distribution to that of  total
                                           mass..
 1  -
     0.01
               0.1         1
              Particle Diameter,
dM/d log D (ptg/m3)
 10*
 103
 102
 10
    = Low-pressure cascade impactor
    - neutron activation analysis
                          Total
                          mass
10-1
10-2
10-3
10-4 =-
10-5 I  I I II
                          Potassium
                          Barium
                          Strontium
             Selenium
                          Arsenic
                          Cesium
I i
        I I II
               INI
  0.01     0.1      1      10
          Particle Diameter, D (/urn)
                   100
Figure  3.   SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF SELECTED
ELEMENTS AT BAGHOUSE OUTLET

     Only  1 of the over  30 elements
analyzed are shown for clarity.  Elements
are present over the entire  particle size
range and  exhibit size distributions
qualitatively similar to  total mass.
Results here and in the  previous figures
are based  on neutron activation analysis
of low  pressure cascade  impactor samples.
Electrical aerosol size  analysis (dashed
line) independently confirms submicrometer
size distributions.
                                         95

-------
            CHARACTERIZATION OF A 10 MW FABRIC FILTER PILOT PLANT

                       By:  W.B. Smith and K.M. Gushing
                            Southern Research Institute
                              2000 Ninth Avenue South
                               Birmingham, AL 35255

                                  R.C. Carr
                      Electric Power Research Institute
                               P.O. Box 10402
                             Palo Alto, CA 94304

                                  ABSTRACT

     Data are reported describing the initial operating phase of EPRI's 10 MW
Fabric Filter Pilot Plant.  During these tests the main variable studied was
the method of cleaning the bags.  One of the four compartments was operated in
a shake/deflate mode and the other three in reverse air cleaning mode.  Signif-
icant differences were found in the operating pressure losses for different
cleaning modes.  The lowest pressure loss was experienced with Shaker/deflate
cleaning while the highest was with reverse air and near continuous cleaning.
Extended dwell times resulted in lower operating pressure for the compartments
with reverse air cleaning.  Detailed measurements were made to relate the
operating pressure losses to the properties of the dust cake.
                                INTRODUCTION

     Although the use of fabric filters in controlling particulate emissions
from industrial processes is an established technology; their application to
large electrical generating systems is relatively new.  As more large units
come on line and experience is gained, it is clear that the fundamental mecha-
nisms that govern the operating pressure loss and reliability are not predic-
table or well understood.  In most instances1'2'3'\ however, the emissions
are very low.

     EPRI is conducting detailed tests of a 10 MW Fabric Filter Pilot Plant
(FFPP) at the Arapahoe Emissions Control and Test Facility  to build a data
base relating the design, startup, and operating parameters to the efficiency,
pressure loss, cost, and reliability.  These data will support the electric
utilities in designing more efficient full-scale systems.

     The FFPP is a versatile system allowing flexibility in selecting most of
the operating parameters (air/cloth ratio, cleaning mode, cleaning intensity,
flow distribution, ash concentration, dwell time, bag materials, bag size, pre-
coating, and preheating).  During the test reported here, the variables tested
were the bag cleaning method and dwell (or filtering) time.

     The following sections contain a description of the performance of the
FFPP during the first few months of operation and of detailed experiments that
were performed to relate the measured performance to the properties of the


                                       96

-------
aerosol/filter system.  In the  discussion section,  the data  are  summarized and
the dependence of the operating pressure loss on the properties  of  the  dust
cake is discussed.

                 OPERATION OF THE FABRIC FILTER PILOT PLANT

     The FFPP contains  four  compartments, each equipped for  independent opera-
tion.  The system is designed for a nominal flowrate of 30,000 ft3/min, but
individual compartments can  be  operated at flowrates up to 15,000 ft3/min.  As
shown in Figure 1, each compartment contains 36 bags in a 6x6 array.  Shaker,
reverse air, or combinations of these are available cleaning methods.   The bag
support assemblies and  tube  sheets are adjustable,  allowing  the  evaluation of
22, 26, 30, and 34 foot bags of various diameters.   Each compartment is equip-
ped with a dirty gas inlet,  compartment bypass, reverse air, clean  air preheat,
and clean air outlet duct.   This  arrangement allows complete flexibility in
selecting the operating conditions for each compartment.  Provision is made
for the injection of flyash  into  the inlet to allow testing  under a wide range
of dust concentration.  The  entire system can be decoupled from  the boiler for
air load testing.  The  FFPP  is  controlled and all of the operating  flowrates,
pressures, and temperatures  monitored by a dedicated micro-processor.

     The FFPP is operated on a  sidestream from a 110 MW, pulverized coal boiler
burning "Energy"  (0.3%  S) fuel.   In order to study  the dependence of the FFPP
operation upon the boiler condition, logs are kept  of the primary operating
parameters of the latter.  Coal and ash samples are taken frequently for
analysis, and NO  and Q%  monitors are installed in  the gas stream.

     A variety of test  methods  are being used to measure the performance of
the FFPP.  For investigations of  gas flow, s-type pitots, hot-wire  anemometers,
and smoke are used.  For  particulate measurements at the inlets, cascade
impactors, cascade cyclones, mass trains, and a transmissometer  are used.  For
particulate measurements  at  the outlets, cascade impactors,  mass trains,
special photometers, and  a Fine Particle Sizing Stack Spectrometer  (FSSS)* are
used.  An Electrical Aerosol Size Analyzer (EASA) ** is used  at the  inlet and
outlet to measure the size and  concentration of submicron particles.  Windows
and lights are distributed throughout the system to allow visual observations
during operation.  Samples are  cut from the bags for detailed analysis of the
dust cake.

     In preparation for startup the compartments were all equipped  with woven
glass fiber bags coated with silicon/teflon/graphite (Albany International
Q53-S3016 "Tri-Coat") 34  feet long and one foot in  diameter.  Compartment A
was programmed for shaker/deflate cleaning.  Compartments B, C,  and D were
programmed for reverse  air cleaning.  The bags in compartment A  contain no
rings.  The others have eight support rings spaced  about four feet  apart.  The
ringed bags were tensioned to 75  Ibs and the nonringed bags  to 60 Ibs.  It was
decided not to preheat  or precoat any of the compartments because those
procedures do not represent  typical industry practice.

 *Particle Measurements Systems,  Boulder, Colorado
**Thermosystems Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota


                                       97

-------
     When shutting down, it was planned to purge the compartments with  clean,
heated air to avoid condensation of flue gas upon cooling, although  two
unplanned shutdowns occurred where purging was not possible with no  apparent
permanent detrimental effects.  Arrangements were made to check all  flows,
pressures, temperatures, and particulate monitors around the clock.

     After the initial startup period, all of the compartments with  reverse
air cleaning were put on time initiation instead of AP initiation because the
increasing pressure loss led to continuous cleaning when operated in the AP
initiation mode.  Each compartment was set to a different dwell time in order
to further investigate the effect of dwell time upon the pressure drop  observed
previously at the Kramer station.3  Ultimately the system settled into  a stable
operating mode as shown in Figure 2.  The operating parameters of the FFPP for
these tests are summarized in Table 1.

     Referring to Figure 2 the phenomenon first noticed at the Kramer station
is confirmed.  If a compartment is left on line longer without cleaning, the
residual AP after cleaning and the slope in the AP vs. time curve are lower.
This appears to be a clear indication that heavier dust cakes are easier to
dislodge, which might be deduced intuitively.  On the other hand, the depen-
dence of the slope on the time between cleaning cycles is not as easily
explained.  Perhaps this is an indication that certain areas on fabric  surface
are more nearly cleaned to a "like new" condition.

             TABLE 1.  OPERATING PARAMETERS DURING THE FFPP TESTS

Compartment     Air/Cloth Ratio     Dwell Period         Cleaning Method

     A           2.0 ft3/acfm         ^ 2 hrs        Shake/deflate,  AP  initi-
                                                     ate, +_ 2 inches, 2Hz

     B                "                 1 hr         Reverse air, timed, 1.5
                                                     ft3/ac£m
     C                "             3 or 3.5 hrs

     D                "                 5 hrs
     The curves shown in Figure 2 also offer a possible explanation for the
reason that the tests where the reverse air cleaning was AP initiated  (4.5 iwc)
were unsuccessful.  As the time between cleaning (dust load in bags) is
reduced, the residual AP increases and the slope increases.  Thus, any pertur-
bation resulting in an increased AP will create an unstable situation driving
the system toward a condition of continuous cleaning.

     Two positive aspects of the bag cleaning experience can be derived from
Figure 2.  The first is that shaker/deflate cleaning appears to be a viable
method, although not optimized during these tests.  The second is that it can
be seen to be advantageous to employ timed cleaning, rather than AP initiation,
and extend the time—perhaps beyond five hours.  From the second observation


                                        98

-------
it was concluded that additional  data and understanding of the cleaning
phenomenon might be gained  through artificially increasing the inlet mass
concentration  (dust accumulation  rate)  by injecting fly ash at the  inlet.

     The results of the  ash injection tests are shown in Figures 3,  4, and  5
for compartments B, C, and  D,  respectively.  No data are shown for  compartment
A because it was operated at a lower flow during these tests to reduce the
load on the booster fan.  Sufficient ash was injected to increase the mass
concentration  from 2.5 to 11.4 gr/scf.   The pressure loss before cleaning and
after cleaning and the rate of increase in pressure loss (slope of  curves in
Figure 2 are plotted vs.  time. All three of these parameters were  affected
immediately by the injected ash.   Filter cycles that were in progress when  the
injection began were characterized by increases in the slope of AP  vs time  and
higher pressure drops.   In  subsequent cycles, however, the residual pressure
drop  (after cleaning) decreased for all three compartments.   The AP before
cleaning and slope were  significantly lower in compartment B, but essentially
unchanged in C and D.  It should  be noted that the total test period, 17 hours,
was too short  for any of the compartments to reach a stable condition.  Com-
partment D, for example,  only cleaned 3 times during the test.  It  is clear
from  these data that the additional dust load resulted in better cleaning
within all three compartments. The improvement was greatest in compartment B
where the dust loading on the bags was least under ordinary conditions.  The
improvement in compartment  D was  much smaller, perhaps indicating that the  5
hour  cleaning  period was near optimal for the normal (2.5 gr/scf) mass concen-
tration and our cleaning sequence.

      The data  are shown  plotted another way in Figure 6.   Here the  pressure
loss before  (AP  ) and after (AP   )  cleaning are shown plotted as functions of
filtering time,Bwith and without  the ash injection.  It appears from the curves
that  no advantage can be gained by extending the dwell time beyond  about five
hours.  Although it is possible to reduce AP   by extending the filtering time,
the problem of a high average AP  remains.  Tnus further studies are planned to
investigate means of cleaning the bags further.

      Throughout the tests the efficiency of the compartments was very high—on
the order of 99.99+% for the reverse air compartments and 99.95+% for the
shaker compartment.  Typical recordings of the outlet opacity (undiluted and
normalized to  a 10M stack)  are shown in Figure 7.  The emissions increase by
about two orders of magnitude immediately after cleaning, but quickly subside
to yield opacities less  than 0.05% for the reverse air and 0.2% for the shaker
compartments.

      In an effort to interpret and understand the operating conditions of the
FFPP  observed  during the startup  and early operation periods, detailed analyses
of fabric samples were undertaken.  The thrust of these analyses was to charac-
terize the residual dust layer as thoroughly as possible and to relate the
observed properties to the  operating AP and clean down effectiveness.  The
measurements included permeability tests, higher reverse air/cloth, photo-
graphs, thickness profiles, mass  density, and size analysis.  All of the
measurements were made using swatches carefully cut from the top, middle, and
bottom sections of the bags after the cpmpartments were shut down.


                                        99

-------
     Recall that during operation the bags in compartment A were shaken with
reverse air assist at a AP of 4.5 iwc.  Those in compartments B, C, and D were
cleaned using reverse air  (A/C of 1.5:1) at intervals of 1, 3, and 5 hours,
respectively.  Figure 9 contains photographs illustrating the remarkable
differences in appearance from compartment to compartment and top to bottom.
Notice the common formations of "nodular deposits" in compartments B,  C,  and D.
Upon close examination, the nodules can be seen to be attached to fibers
protruding from the main body of the bafric.  Both the nodules and smooth cake
are rather frangible and can be disturbed easily with a pencil.  There is no
evidence of any "cement" like properties.  The swatches taken from the tops of
the bags appear visually to contain a heavier dust cake then those from the
bottom.  It is surmised that an avalanche effect occurs during the cleaning
cycle and that the lower parts of the bags tend to be swept clean.  Vertical
lines of smoother material can be seen in the swatches from compartments  B, C,
and D at positions when the bags folded during reverse-air cleaning.

     The pressure loss vs. A/C of the filter material and residual dust layers
was measured by clamping the samples into a standard 8 x 10 inch high-volume
filter holder and measuring the pressure drop as flow was increased in the
forward and reverse direction.  Figure 8 shows AP vs air/cloth measured in the
forward direction before and after running the swatches at reverse A/C of
4.1:1.  It was surprising to find the more permeable cakes at the top in
compartments C and D because the dust cakes appeared visually to be much
heavier, and that although the bags had already been cleaned in the compartment
at an A/C of 1.5:1, additional reductions in pressure loss were achieved by
increasing the reverse air/cloth ratio to 4:1.

     From these data it can be concluded that the flow through the bags during
the filter cycle is strongly stratified immediately after cleaning from top to
bottom of the bags.  Greater flow occurs at the top in the reverse air compart-
ments despite heavier dust loads and greater flow at the bottom in the shaker
compartment.  The pressure loss does not correlate well with mass of dust cake
per unit area indicating that the packing density or size distribution may be
different.

                                 DISCUSSION

     From the data described above it appears that the details of the gas flow
and pressure loss are intimately related to properties of the dust cake.  This
dependence results in large variations in flow along the length of the bags
after cleaning.  It is not known how long this unequal flow persists into the
dwell period.

     Heavier dust cakes are easier to remove than light ones, indicating  that
extended dwell times might allow operation at lower average pressure than very
short dwell times or continuous cleaning.  Some increase in maximum Ap may be
required to accumulate the heavier cakes, however, and additional tests will
be required to optimize the operating cycle.

     Published literature on the removal of collected dust from bags and  the
factors determining the pressure loss are scarce.  Dennis5 has observed that

                                     100

-------
"tinder field conditions, dust removal from woven  glass  fabrics  cleaned by
collapse and reverse flow may range from  5 to  35  percent, whereas mechanical
shaking (2.5 cm amplitude at 8 Hz), may provide ~50 percent removal."  Recently
a paper written by Lembach and Penney6 contained  a discussion of "nodular
deposits" formed in fabrics after many cleaning cycles.  It  is  thought
(although not confirmed) by the authors that these deposits, which cling to
protruding fibers, are composed of fine particles and act as check valves
offering little resistance to reverse flow but moving into voids to offer a
high resistance to forward flow.  These deposits  have been observed by others
(e.g. at Four Corners)  and by us.  There is some speculation that the forma-
tion of hydrated salts in the cake make the particles more adhesive.
                         0
     Ariman and Helfritch  have found that dust is removed more easily under
conditions of high relative humidity.  Sproull9 reports that thick layers are
removed (from ESP plates) more easily than thin ones and that the dust is more
easily dislodged at high temperatures.

     Although the physical forces governing particle cohesion and adhesion are
such that individual small particles cling more tightly to one another and
other surfaces than large particles.  It  is generally thought that layers of
fine particles are less porous, but this  rule  of  thumb is not supported by
experimental data.  linoya   has measured the  porosity for polydisperse aggre-
gates of particles of different size and  composition.  His data show that dis-
tributions of small mass median diameter  have  higher porosity (See Table 3.).

     The relationship between the porosity measured in bulk powders and the
operating fabric filter systems is yet to be established.  The fabric structure
may play an important role and the cake may collapse under the gas pressure to
present a more impermeable barrier to flow.

     Further studies will be required to  relate the properties of the aerosol
and dust cake to the operation of fabric  filter systems.  Future plans include:
Tests with variable compartment flow to simulate  large installation, long-term
fly ash injection tests, a range of magnitude  in  the reverse air/cloth, ex-*
tended dwell time for the shaker/deflate  compartment, and a  range of magnitude
in the filtering air/cloth ratio.
TABLE 3. POROSITY* OF ACCUMULATED POWDERS (AFTER IINOYA AND YAMAMURA )
Powder
Talc
Flour
Flour
Clay
Wood Dust
Flue Dust
Flue Dust
Surface Mean
1.
33
12
4.
6.
5.
0.
Diameter, ym
6


6
0
6
24
Porosity {£)
0.74 -
0.51 -
0.62 -
0.68 -
0.90 -
0.74 -
0.
of Deposit
0.81
0.61
0.70
0.71
0.91
0.77
94
*Porosity,  e,  is defined in terms of the pressure drop by D'Arcy's
                                      101

-------
Equation:
                       AP = c(l-e)2S2 yvr or AP - CyVT
                            	v
                                 e"3"
where
P                K
                       AP = the pressure loss observed,
                        e = the porosity,
                       S  = the surface area of a unit volume of the cake,

                        y = the viscosity of the gas,
                        V = the face velocity or A/C,
                        K = the permeability, and
                        T = the thickness of the cake.

                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     Several individuals and organizations have contributed to the design and
evaluation of the FFPP.  The mechanical design, flow modeling, and construction
was done by Lodge Cottrell Division of Dresser Industries.  Lou Rettenmair,
Richard Hooper, and Walter Puille of EPRI have made significant contributions
during the construction, planning, and startup programs.  Kaiser Engineers
provide continuing support for the operation and modification of the unit.
We have benefited significantly from the advice of Charles Gallaer, Engineering
Consultant.

     The data reported here were taken by Ray Wilson, Annette Duncan, and
Myron McCallum of Southern Research Institute.

     The continuing support of Public Service of Colorado is supporting the
emissions control test facility and cooperating with us in this pilot program
is greatly appreciated.

     This work was supported by the Electric Power Research Institute under
contract RP1129-8.
                                      102

-------
                                   ENDNOTES

1.    Ensor,  D.S.,  R.G.  Hooper, and R.W. Sheck.  Determination of the Fractional
     Efficiency,  Opacity Characteristics, Engineering and Economic Aspects of
     a Fabric Filter Operating on a Utility Boiler, EPRI Report No. FP-297,
     November 1976.

2.    Huber,  D.J.   Start-up and Initial Operation of the City of Colorado
     Springs Unit #1, Baghouse Filter.  (Presented at the 5th Fabric Filter
     Forum,  Phoenix, Arizona, January, 1981).

3.    Ensor,  D.S.,  S. Cowen, A. Shendrikar, G.  Markowski, G. Woffinden,
     R. Pearson,  and R. Sheck.  Kramer Station Fabric Filter Evaluation, EPRI
     Report No.  CS-1669, January 1981.

4.    Chambers, R.   Operating Data - Harrington Station.  (Presented at 5th
     Fabric Filter Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, January, 1981) .

5.    Dennis, R.  and H.A. Klemm.  Recent Concepts Describing Filter System
     Performance.    (Presented at the Joint U.S.-Japan Seminar on Measurement
     and Control of Particulates Generated from Human Activities, Kyoto, Japan,
     November, 1980).

6.    Lembach, R.F. and G.W. Penney.  Nodular Deposits in Fabric Filters.  J.
     APCA 29(8),  August 1979.

7.    Singh,  U.  Four Corners Units Four and Five Particulate Removal Project
     Filter-House Pilot Program.  (Presented at 5th Fabric Filter Forum,
     Phoenix, Arizona, January 1981).

8.    Ariman, T.  and D.J. Helfritch.  How Relative Humidity Cuts Pressure Drop
     in Fabric Filters.  Filtration and Separation.  March/April 1977.

9.    Sproull, W.T.  Fundamentals of Electrode Rapping in Industrial Electrical
     Precipitators.   J. APCA 15(2), February 1965.

10.  linoya, K.  and M. Yamamara.  Fundamental Experiments with Fabric Dust
     Collectors.   Chem. Eng.  (Japan) 20, 1956.
                                      103

-------
                                 AHTM6NT   |
                                   SHELL MM- VIEW)
                                   L_|
                                   rvi
                               ««jr\    /
                                HWVEH  \   /
                                                       "rj—i     ^-T-T;
                                                       w— COMPARTMENT B        /
                                                       f    7         /
                                                       ,1-
                                                               1     2     3     4     B

                                                                 WLTtaiNQ TIMS, rcw*      '*»'-*>
   Figure 1.   Sketch of bag compartment with sections   Figure 2.  Typical AP versus time data for reverse
             broken away to show arrangement of               air and shaker cleaning.
             internal details.
        I COW»AaT\tErjT B  t    ;
-•A      fl
-    vMVfT
          i   S 1/V^vT
                 MH IMJ^CTItlN
                                  RATE OF uP IMCREASE
                                 INLET -.OAntMQ

                                 WITHOUT INJECTION
             1C    II     12    13
                                                                                 RATE OF APINCREASE
                                                                                 H^rvjhEN CLEAWNG
                                                                               •'  (iNcHEsmouni
                                                                                JMLET LOADING

                                                                                WITHOUT 1KJEC7I;


                                                                                WTH 1-JJHCriQN

                                                                               1   ' **'
Figure 3.  Tube sheet AP before and after cleaning    Figure 4.  Tube sheet AP before and after cleaning
         and rate of AP increase for Compartment              and rate of AP increase for Compartment
         B during the period December 9-13,1980.
         Ash injection was on for a period of seven-
         teen (17) hours.
                                                 C during the period December 9-13,1980.
                                                 Ash injection was on for a period of seven-
                                                 teen (17) hours.
                                              104

-------
                                 1 MT! Of itf INCBtAH
                                  •ETWEEN CLEANING
                                 tNLET tOACTM

                                 *ITHOUT INJECTION
                                                  Figure 8.  Pressure loss before (AP BC) and after
                                                           (AP AC) cleaning the bags by reverse air
                                                           for different filtering times.
Figure 5.
         Tube sheet AP before and after cleaning
         and rate of AP increase for Compartment
         D during the period December 9-1 3, 1 980.
         Ash injection was on for a period of seven-
         teen (17) hours.
                                                        I*
                                                        j
                                                                      AWCLOTH RATIO.
                                                  Figure 8.  AP versus air/cloth in samples from
                                                            Compartment C before and after reverse
                                                            air tests at air/cloth of 4.1 acfm/ft2.
Figure 7.  Typical response of the opacity monitors
          on Compartments A and B.

                                              105

-------
  st#%MM* I  :'  • ••
BOTTOM
         Figure 9.  Photographs of swatches taken from bags in each compartment of
                  the FFPP.
                                         106

-------
                      SPECIFYING A FABRIC FILTER SYSTEM

                   By:  Ronald L. Ostop
                        Department of Public Utilities
                        Colorado Springs, Colorado  80947

                        David A. Single
                        Buell Emission Control Division
                        Lebanon, Pennsylvania  17041

                                  ABSTRACT

     In the last decade environmental regulations have required demanding
technological advances on particulate control techniques.  One particular
challenge has been collecting fly ash from the combustion of low sulfur coal.
Ten years ago, two of the choices available for collecting high "resistivity"
coal ash were hot side precipitators and cold side precipitators with flue
gas conditioning.  Five years ago, fabric filtration began emerging as
another alternative.

     With the new application of this old technology, fabric filter baghouse
applications have resulted in many successes, and in some instances, systems
that were not so successful.  So, the question arises, "How does one design
and specify a fabric filter baghouse system that will be successful?"

     Based upon actual design and operating experience, this paper presents
the basic information needed to specify a fabric filter system that will pro-
vide cost effective operation.  The discussion will include the conceptual
requirements for specifying such parameters as air-to-cloth ratio, pressure
drop, bypass capability, inlet and outlet valve requirements, pneumatic and
electronic control systems, emergency control instrumentation, etc.

     The operating principles of a baghouse are simple.  By following funda-
mental steps in specifying a baghouse, the subsequent purchase and installa-
tion can be equally uncomplicated.
                                INTRODUCTION

     Fabric filter baghouses are highly efficient and reliable particulate
collection systems.  These systems also demonstrate high availability with
relatively low operating and maintenance costs.  The key to such success is
properly specifying a system which will meet the established need.

     The first step is to define the parameters of the process system to be
controlled.  Such parameters include:

     - Whether the boiler unit is continuous or cyclic.

     - Whether the boiler is stoker-fired or burns pulverized fuel.

     - What is the fuel used for ignition?

     - What are the fuel characteristics?


                                     107

-------
     - What is the maximum air flow rate?

     - What are the maximum and minimum operating temperatures?

     - Is there any flue gas desulfurization prior to the fabric filter
       system?

     - What is the maximum ash and moisture content of the fuel?

     - What operating pressure drop will be compatible with the complete
       process system?

     The careful examination of the application and the emphasis of the phys-
ical phenomena of mass, momentum and heat transfer will avoid such problems
at excessively high differential pressures and corrosion of the baghouse
structure and auxiliary equipment.  It will also help avoid erosion of the
filter media and rotating equipment, while still resulting in no visible
emissions being emitted from the stack.

Operating Principles

     The application of fabric filtration is found in that branch of fluid
mechanics describing the flow of fluids through a porous material.  In
theory, the collection mechanisms are described by processes of impaction,
interception and diffusions.  In practice, hot dust laden flue gases pass
through a fabric filter leaving approximately 99-9% of the dust behind.

     The fabric itself does not collect all of these particles.  The fibers
act as a substrate to capture and hold the larger particles which in turn
act as the filter media for capturing the smaller particles.  Therefore, the
development of the filter cake during the initial conditioning period will
determine the success of the operation of the baghouse.

     Operational observations have shown that the filter efficiency increases
with the increase of pressure drop across the filter during the development
of the filter cake.  Once the filter cake has been established, the increase
of pressure differential will stabilize and the ultimate collection effic-
iency will be established.

Conceptual Design Considerations

Air-to-Cloth Ratio

     The air-to-cloth ratio is the major parameter in determining the cost
of the fabric filter system.  It will determine the physical size of the
baghouse and its auxiliary equipment, thus being a major factor in the cost
of material and labor.  The air-to-cloth ratio is also directly proportional
to the pressure drop across the collection equipment.  Pressure drop is the
main parameter in determining the operating cost of the fabric filter system.
The cost of bag replacement is second to the pressure drop costs, but they
are related.


                                    108

-------
     Low air-to-cloth ratios will lead to lower pressure drops across the
filter and longer bag life, thus resulting in higher capital costs with lower
operation and maintenance costs.  On the other hand, higher air-to-cloth
ratios will increase pressure drop, decrease bag life and possibly affect the
reliability and availability of the collection system.

     An optimum solution can be found.  The choice must be based upon what
the site specific need is and what the overall utility philosophy is.  The
following are considerations which should be incorporated in determining the
air-to-cloth ratio:

     - Determine the maximum amount of land area available for installing
       the fabric filter system.  This is of major importance if the system
       is being retrofitted on an existing boiler unit.  Installations at
       new power plant sites usually allow for more flexibility.

     - Determine the maximum possible flue gas flow rate that can be emitted
       to the baghouse.  This should include burning the fuel with the worst
       combustion characteristics that the boiler can handle; i.e. lowest
       BTU per pound, highest excess air, highest moisture content, etc.  The
       calculation should also include leakage into the flue gas which would
       increase the flow rate such as air heater leakage, tempering air,
       soot blowing, etc.  Air flows used for design purposes which are ob-
       tained from measuring the flow rates of existing units may be mis-
       leading.  These flow rates are usually lower than the maximum and will
       more than likely result in higher air-to-cloth ratios and higher
       pressure drops than desired.

     - Determine the maximum pressure drop that can be handled by the fans
       while maintaining maximum load while burning the fuel with character-
       istics likely to produce the most particulate.

     Theory shows a relationship between pressure drop across the filter
with respect to air-to-cloth ratio as follows:

                                   P = Sv

     Where:  AP is the average pressure drop across the baghouse  (inches
             of water),

             v is the air-to-cloth ratio,  (ft./min.),

             S is the filter drag  (inches of water/ft./min.)

     Field measurements on a Colorado Springs system have shown a filter
drag of approximately 2.5 inches of water/ft./min.  0)  This is from fly
ash from northwest Colorado coal in a pulverized coal boiler.  The mass mean
diameter of the fly ash particles ranged from 2 to  50 ym.  (2)  It should be
noted that the AP calculated for all compartments in  the filtering mode will
not be the maximum pressure drop that will be used  to design the  fan.  When
compartments are in the cleaning mode or out of service for maintenance, the
air-to-cloth ratio will increase,  thus increasing the pressure drop.

                                     109

-------
     If there is a strict size limitation due to available land area,  the
maximum size of the baghouse may already be determined.  The determination
to be made then is how many compartments should the baghouse have and  what
should the size of the fan be to move the air through the baghouse.  Be
careful of promises to provide low pressure differentials with high air-to-
cloth ratios.  This is contrary to the laws of physics.  Such promises may
lead to undersizing the fan, thus load limiting the boiler unit.

     If land area is not a limiting factor, an optimum size can be determined
by performing a cost analysis.  Remember, a lower air-to-cloth ratio will in-
crease capital costs by increasing materials and labor and a higher air-to-
cloth ratio will increase operation and maintenance costs by increasing
pressure drop across the system and reducing bag life.  However, it is
possible to run into operating problems if the air-to-cloth ratio is too low.
If the velocity in a compartment is reduced and the temperature is low, which
is typical of low load operation, moisture in the flue gas stream may con-
dense in areas of no flow and begin corroding.  It should be noted that
maintaining a sufficient velocity in a compartment or in the ductwork will
minimize if not eliminate condensation, even if the temperatures are below
the dewpoint.

     To give an example, the City of Colorado Springs has installed two
fabric filter systems within the last two and a half years.   One system was
retrofitted on a 400,000 ACFM 85MW unit and the other was installed on a new
1,071,600 ACFM 200MW unit.  Both systems were specified with the same con-
servative conceptual design parameters.  Both fabric filter systems operate
at an efficiency exceeding 99.9% at average pressure drops of approximately
4.5 inches of water, even though they are built by different vendors.  The
City did not issue a design specification, but instead it specified a per-
formance contract, so each manufacturer was to use his best engineering
practices considering the following conceptual parameters:

     - An independent cleaning cycle operation was provided for nominally
       every 500,000 ACFM.

     - The air-to-cloth ratio was 2:1 for each independent cleaning cycle
       with one compartment out of service and one compartment in the clean-
       ing mode (two compartments out of service).

     - The bag cloth area was defined to be the active filter area and shall
       not include surfaces occupied by anti-collapse rings, caps, cuffs,
       seams, or the length of the inlet thimble penetration.

     - The maximum composite pressure drop across  each baghouse module gas
       inlet and outlet manifold shall not exceed  5.0 inches of water gauge.

     Both baghouse systems operate with similar results.   Both exceed state
and federal collection requirements by about 75%.   Both systems have negli-
gible maintenance cost and the system availability exceeds 99%.  The 85MW
unit has one clean cycle operation with twelve compartments and 198 bags
thirty feet long and twelve inches in diameter in each compartment.  The
200MW unit has two independent cleaning cycle operations.  Its thirty-six

                                      110

-------
compartments are housed in two modules  of  eighteen  compartments each with
156 bags thirty-one feet long and  12  inches  in  diameter  in each compartment.

Filter Cleaning Systems

     During the filtering process,  fly  ash builds up on  the  inside of the
fabric.  The velocity through the  fabric will remain constant, but the filter
drag will increase, thus increasing pressure drop.  In order to continue to
operate the baghouse, without exceeding the  capabilities of  the fan in the
system, the bags must be periodically cleaned.   Systems  utilized in cleaning
the bags include reverse air, high pressure  pulse,  and shaking the bags.

     It should be noted that the primary mechanism  for cleaning the bags is
mechanical action.  That is, during the filtering process, the ash forms a
"cake" on the inside wall of the bag.   Changing the shape of the bag during
the cleaning period will break this cake away from  the bag wall and allow it
to fall into the collection hopper.

     Reverse air cleaning is one of the most widely used cleaning mechanisms.
The filter bags are nominally 30 to 35  feet  long and 12  inches in diameter
with steel anti-collapse rings spaced throughout the length of the bag.  When
a compartment of bags is put in the cleaning mode,  it is isolated from the
flue gas stream, and clean hot flue gas enters  the  compartment in the reverse
direction.  This will collapse the bags, thus breaking off the filter cake.
The anti-collapse rings will prevent  this  long  bag  from  "pancaking" (collaps-
ing to the point where the bag becomes  flat  thus not allowing the filter cake
to fall into the storage hopper).   The  amount of reverse air used should be
only as much as is needed to collapse the  bags.  Under normal conditions
too much reverse air will tend to  overclean  the bags, thus reducing overall
collection efficiency, and reducing bag life.

     Shaking the bags is the second most widely used method for cleaning.
The compartment is isolated from the  flue  gas stream, the bags are gently
shaken and then subjected to a gentle reverse air flow.  This will change
the shape of the bags, which will  then  break the fly ash cake away from the
wall of the bag.  Bags in a shaker system  do not have anti-collapse rings.
With the shaking action, these rings  will  cause wear and premature failure.
As a result, if the bag is too long,  pancaking  may  occur.  Experience in
Australian baghouse applications indicates that a baghouse with a shaker
type cleaning method should not have  bags  exceeding 20 feet in length and
six inches in diameter (3).  This  will  result in an effective cloth area
per bag about one third of that for a bag  used  in a reverse air cleaning
system.  For the same air-to-cloth ratio,  this  will result in a baghouse
structure taking up at least three times the ground area.  Utilizing larger
bags in the shaker cleaning type baghouse  will  result in less efficient
cleaning which will increase the filter drag, thus  increasing pressure
differential across the system.

     High pressure pulse cleaning  is  limited by the size of  the filter bags.
The compressed air used to emit the pulse  to the bag is  only effective to
bags up to approximately 15 feet long.  Pulse jet baghouses  are generally
designed at an air-to-cloth ratio  approximately twice that of reverse air  or

                                      111

-------
shaker baghouses.  Even so, a pulse jet would require twice the land area of
a reverse air type baghouse.  The pulse jet tends to overclean the bags which
will increase emissions.  On the average, reverse air type baghouses have
offered the most cost effective operation on large utility boilers to date.

Bag Specifications

     The typical fabric used in constructing the fabric filter bags for use
on coal-fired boilers is fiber glass.  With the recent introduction of spray
absorbtion techniques for flue gas desulfurization, inlet baghouse tempera-
tures will be lower.  This will lead to use of other types of fabrics being
used in fabric filter collection systems.  It should be noted that if low
temperature fabrics are used in installations following spray absorbtion
systems, the availability of the boiler unit may be lowered.  If there is a
malfunction with the spray absorber unit, the entire boiler and baghouse
unit will have to be shut down until the malfunction is corrected.  The low
temperature bags will not be able to withstand the higher temperatures re-
sulting from a spray absorber which has been bypassed.

     Varying finishes are available with fiber glass bags to prevent self-
abrasion of the fiber glass.  Some typical finishes include teflon, silicon
graphite, and a tri-coating which uses a combination of teflon, silicon
graphite and an acid resistant coating.  The finish specified is to the
customer's preference.  An investigation should be conducted on the desirable
bag performance and baglife characteristics before specifying and accepting
a particular bag finish from a vendor.

     The bag specification should include the number and type of anti-
collapse rings if the baghouse incorporates a reverse air cleaning system.
A typical specification for anti-collapse rings may be as follows:

          Bags shall be provided with a minimum of seven sewn-in anti-
     collapse rings (bags nominally 30 feet long and 12 inches in diameter).
     The rings shall be 3/16 inches minimum thickness steel located 30
     inches from the bottom of the bag and on four centers.

     It should also be specified that the top end of the bag be provided
with a steel cap with an eye bolt (4).  It is advisable to specify stainless
steel rings and caps to minimize deterioration due to the corrosive flue gas
environment.

     The bags provide the collection mechanism of the system.  Special atten-
tion should be given to their selection.  The proper bag given the proper
care will lead to a highly efficient cost-effective collection system.

Compartment, Hopper, and Inlet and Outlet Arrangements

     The arrangement of the compartment and hoppers will more than likely be
dictated by the space available for the installation.  However, the arrange-
ment of the inlet manifold and the inlets and outlets to the compartments are
crucial to a cost effective operation.


                                    112

-------
     The inlet manifold should be designed to approach an equal distribution
of particles to each compartment.  The inlet to the hopper area and outlet of
the compartment should be located to provide an equal distribution of flow to
all the bags.  Also, the velocities entering and leaving a compartment should
be low enough not to cause turbulent flow in the hopper area.  Turbulence
will cause increased pressure drop and decrease the effective cloth area of a
compartment.  Typical velocities entering a compartment which will reduce
turbulence are 20 to 25 feet per second.  The typical outlet velocity range
is from 30 to 40 feet per second.

     It is advisable to require a fluid  flow model study in the specification
to arrive at the proper arrangement to maximize the effectiveness of the
fabric filter system.

Operation Control Systems

     The type of logic control system is again a matter of customer prefer-
ence.  New microprocessor control systems provide more flexibility, are
easier to reprogram and utilize approximately one-one hundredth of the space
of the relay-time type logic control systems.  Ease of trouble shooting and
longer component life are also advantageous to the microprocessor controllers.

     If a pneumatic actuator system is used, the following should be provided
to insure a  reliable operation:

     - A sufficiently sized air dryer to eliminate moisture in the system
       which could freeze in cold weather or cause corrosion in the system.

     - A sufficiently sized air receiver to provide quick recovery of the
       air supply system following an emergency bypass and isolation
       situation.

     - Air regulators and lubricators at each pneumatic operator to provide
       consistent reliable service.

     Some instrumentation which will be  useful during start-up and operation
of a fabric  filter system includes:

     - Inlet and outlet temperature recorders.
     - Individual compartment  temperature recorders.
     - Flange to flange pressure drop recorder.
     - Inlet flow rate recorder.
     - Reverse air flow rate recorders.
     - Visual emissions monitor recorder.
     - Compartment operational mode indicators.

Bypass and Emergency Control Provisions

     Many new installations provide for  a baghouse bypass which is used
during start-up of a boiler unit and for emergency  isolation during a serious
boiler system upset condition.  The bypass must be designed  so that there  is


                                     113

-------
no leakage of dirty flue gas to the stack during normal operation.  A typical
way to avoid leakage is to provide a double louvre damper system in the by-
pass duct work.  The plenum between the louvre dampers is then pressurized
with a seal air fan or a globe valve so that leakage is from the plenum to
the bypass duct work in both directions, thus eliminating fly ash infiltra-
tion around the baghouse.

     The baghouse bypass is an advantage during the start-up period of the
boiler unit.  It allows the boiler to be started up and stabilized on clean
fuels, such as natural gas and No. 2 fuel oil.  The baghouse can then be put
on-line with hot flue gas from these fuels just before going to coal firing.
This will minimize the potential for condensation forming during the initial
start-up stages which could lead to blinding the bags.

     Emergency bypass and isolation operations should be provided to prevent
irreparable damage during certain upset conditions.  Such conditions would
probably lead to boiler unit shutdown so, in these cases, system protection
is essential.  Emergency conditions of great concern are excessive differ-
ential pressure across the baghouse and high temperatures entering the bag-
house.  High differential pressure can be caused by a massive boiler tube
leak.  High inlet temperatures can be caused by a malfunctioning air pre-
heater.  Both situations will result in damage to the bags if not isolated.
Also, these emergency situations will cause a boiler shutdown;  therefore,
continued exceedences of emission standards are unlikely.

     A low temperature bypass trip, which has been used in some baghouse in-
stallations is unnecessary.  In fact, it may cause more harm than good.   The
only time a low temperature situation arises is during a controlled shutdown.
If warm moisture laden flue gas is isolated in a bypassed baghouse during the
shutdown process, these stagnated gases will slowly cool down in the com-
partments and the moisture will condense on the compartment walls and the
bags.  This will result in corrosion of the compartment walls and operating
valves.  The condensed moisture will also form small nodules with the ash in-
creasing filter drag, thus resulting in higher operating pressure drops.

     If low load operation results in dangerously low baghouse inlet tempera-
tures, an air preheated bypass can be provided to increase the temperature
to the baghouse.

     If the baghouse is bypassed and isolated as a result of an upset con-
dition, provisions should be made in the operating instructions to purge
the baghouse of the moisture laden flue gases.  Ambient air contains less
than one-tenth of the moisture than flue gas.

Other Options

     With the introduction of dry FGD systems preceding a fabric filter
system, inlet temperatures to baghouses are lower.  A spray absorbtion
system reduces sulfur content of the flue gas.  Acids resulting from carbon
dioxide and oxides of nitrogen can be formed at temperatures approaching
adiabatic saturation of the flue gas.  During full load situations when
compartment velocities are their highest, the probability of low pH conden-

                                     114

-------
sation is minimal.  However, at reduced  load  situations when air-to-cloth
ratios are lowered, acidic condensation  may develop.  Therefore, it is ad-
visable to investigate reheat systems which will meet the need of the
specific boiler unit.

     Some fabric filter installations have incorporated a preheat system to
prevent moisture condensation during start-up and shutdown.  This is an
expensive luxury which can be avoided by developing and implementing good
start-up, shutdown and operating procedures.  This is possible even for a
cycling unit.

Operation and Maintenance Instructions

     The specifications should require detailed operation and maintenance
instructions not only for the entire system as a whole, but also for indi-
vidual components.  These instructions should include trouble shooting pro-
cedures, periodic component checks, calibration procedures and procedures
for start-up, shutdown, and emergency contingencies.

     The start-up and shutdown procedures are of particular importance.
These procedures are unique to each installation and must be customized.
They must be incorporated in the boiler  and turbine start-up and shutdown
procedures.  Because of environmental restrictions, the fabric filter system
has become an integral part of coal-firing to produce electricity.  These
procedures are as important as the components of the baghouse for properly
operating the system.

Guarantees and Warranties

     The best specification that can be  written will state the desired
results and allow the vendor to utilize  his expertise in designing and in-
stalling his product.  Unfortunately, the process of competitive bidding
may short circuit this ideal.  As a result, a specification must be written
to obtain the desired results without inhibiting the vendor's talent and
expertise.  This is commonly referred to as a performance specification.

     A performance specification should  be based upon rendering final com-
pensation to the vendor in return for specific performance criteria.  The
criteria should be based on results.  These results should reflect economics,
operationability, and compliance with applicable environmental standards.
Therefore, criteria for achieving the desired performance must be specific.
Examples of performance criteria are:

     - Maximum pressure drop across the  fabric filter system.

     - Maximum temperature drop across the fabric filter system.

     - Minimum acceptable collection efficiency under specified operating
       conditions of the baghouse.
                                     115

-------
     All tests performed to prove compliance with the performance  criteria
must be specific and relative to the purpose of the operation of the  entire
system within the constraints of environmental standards.

Design Input to Vendors

     In order to obtain what is needed for particulate control, the proper
input must be provided to the vendor.  This again will be unique to each
specific application.  The following is a suggested list of parameters which
will facilitate the design and installation of the equipment to meet  your
needs:

     - Size and type of combustion unit.
     - Primary fuel and ignition fuel.
     - Static pressure at baghouse inlet.
     - Expected flue gas temperature at full load and maximum load.
     - Maximum flue gas temperature.
     - Maximul fuel firing rate.
     - Flue gas flow rate at maximum load and minimum load.
     - Coal analysis to include moisture content, sulfur content, ash
       content, and heat rate in BTU/lb.
     - Maximum fly ash rate to baghouse.
     - Elevation at plant site.
     - Flue gas temperature for equipment selection and structural design.
     - Snow loads, wind loads, and seismic loads.
     - Internal pressure design.
     - Fly ash density.
     - Minimum fly ash storage capacity.
     - Dust load build-up conditions in ductwork.
     - Maximum acceptable pressure and temperature drop across system.
     - Bag specifications including bag reach.
     - Maximum velocity through each compartment inlet and outlet.
     - Maximum air-to-cloth ratio.
     - Installation space limitations.
     - Model study results.
     - Calculations deriving air-to-cloth ratio with respect to pressure
       drop, damper leakage, thermal movement, temperature differential
       throughout the system, hopper sizing.

Conclusion

     A fabric filter has proven to be a very cost-effective means to  obtain
high collection efficiency of particulates produced by utility boilers.
These systems, if properly designed and operated, can provide a means of
controlling particulate emissions with high availability with reasonable
operating and maintenance costs.  The operation of a fabric filtration
system is not complicated.  Specifying such a system can be equally as
uncomplicated by determining the specific need and results required.
                                    116

-------
                                  ENDNOTES

1.   Test Report for Research and Development on Test Baghouse at Martin
    Drake Unit No. 6, City of Colorado Springs, Volume II, Mathematical
    Modeling, Eric A. Samuel, 1980.

2.   Test Report for Research and Development on Test Baghouse at Martin
    Drake Unit No. 6, City of Colorado Springs, Volume II, Main Baghouse
    and Pilot R & D Baghouse Particle Loading, T. K. Chiang, 1980.

3.   Discussion with Electricity Commission of New South Wales, Sidney,
    Australia, February 9, 1981.

4.   Specifications for Modular Baghouse Fabric Filter System for the
    Ray D. Nixon Power Plant, 1976.
                                      117

-------
             EVALUATION OF THE  25  MW KRAMER STATION BAGHOUSE:
        OPERATIONAL FACTORS  IN  PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSION  CONTROL

                                     By

                                 R. C. Carr
                                M.  W. McElroy

                     Electric Power Research Institute
                           Palo Alto, California

     The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is  currently supporting a
major research program characterizing the emission control  performance of
fabric filter baghouses in coal-fired utility boiler  applications.  One such
effort reported  here  is an evaluation of the Kramer Station baghouses of the
Nebraska Public  Power  District.  These units represent  the  first application
of fabric  filter control  technology to pulverized-coal  fired utility boilers
burning a  western,  low-sulfur sub-bituminous coal.

       As  summarized  below and in Figure 1, the baghouse cleaning cycle had
the  greatest  effect on particulate matter removal efficiency compared to any
other operational parameters.   Implementation of a "preferred" 100-minute
cleaning cycle,  obtained  by extending the dwell time  between compartment^
cleaning from zero to eight minutes, reduced particulate matter penetration
by 50 percent without an  increase in pressure drop.   Total  particulate
matter collection efficiency measured for the baghouse  with the preferred
cycle in effect  averaged  99.92 percent, with associated outlet emissions and
stack opacity of 0.001 lb/106 Btu (0.43 ng/J) and 0.07  percent, respectively.
The  0.07 percent opacity  is equivalent to a 20 kilometer stack "visibility."
As shown in Figure 2,  the baghouse  size dependent mass  collection efficiency
exceeded 99 percent over  the measured 0.02 to 10 micrometers diameter size
range.  The clear stack and low outlet emissions were maintained throughout
the  nine-month test program despite intentional variations  in baghouse
operating  parameters  and uncontrolled fluctuations  in coal  ash content and
boiler combustion conditions.  The  continuing good performance during these
episodes suggests that the baghouse is a very effective and forgiving
particulate emission control device for utility application.  The particulate
mass removal efficiencies and outlet emissions measured for Kramer are
remarkably similar to results obtained in a previous  EPRI study of the Nucla
Station baghouse.  This comparison  is very  significant since there are major
design  differences between  the two  baghouse  installations and boilers  (Nucla
is  spreader-stoker whereas  the Kramer units are  pulverized-coal).
                       KRAMER UNIT 3 BAGHOUSE EMISSION SUMMARY

                                Average Concentration
                                     (gr/sct)                    Emissions (lb/106 Btu)
            Cleaning    Air/Cloth Ratio  	 Efficiency  Opacity
             Cycle       (acfm/ft2)      Inlet  Outlet      (%)     (%)     Total   <2fim
         Continuous,
         10-minute cycle      1.80        1.00  0.0014      99.86    0.08    0.002    0.0005
         Preferred,
         100-minute cycle     1.86        0.69  0.0006      99.92    0.07    0.0009   0.0002
         No cleaning,
         350 minutes        1.57        1.38  0.00032     99.98    0.02    0.0005   0.00008

                                      118

-------
                           Figure 1

     OUTLET CONCENTRATION VS AIR-TO-CLOTH RATIO
 Outlet Concentration
 (gr/scf X 10-2)
 1.0
 0.1
0.01
                    Approximate Emissions
                               (lb/106Btu)
                                     0.01
                         Kramer 10-
                         minute cycle
                            Kramer 100-
                            minute cycle
                         Nucla
             continuous cleaning "7

                             •


                   /Nucla
                     hourly cleaning
                                  Nucla no
                                  cleaning
                           Kramer no cleaning
    1.0        1.4        1.8       2.2        2.6

                    Air-to-Cloth Ratio (acfm/ft2)
                                                           0.001
                                                           0.0001
                                  3.0
                          Figure  2

               SIZE DEPENDENT PENETRATION

      Penetration (%)                   Collection Efficiency (%)
                                                    "3  90.0
                  Air-to-cloth ratio 1.73 acfm/ft2
                  100-minute cleaning cycle
                    Kramer
            electric-aerosol
               size analyzer
     0.01
        0.01
 0.1             1.0
Particle Diameter
                                                   —  99.0
                                                   '—  99.9
                                                       99.99
                                                    10.0
                              119

-------
             PULSE-JET TYPE FABRIC FILTER EXPERIENCE AT AIR TO CLOTH
               RATIOS OF 5 TO 1 ON A BOILER FIRING PULVERIZED COAL
                         By:   G.  L.  Pearson
                              Adolph Coors Company
                              Golden, Colorado 80401
                                    ABSTRACT

     Since November, 1979,  a  12 module baghouse of Carter-Day design has been
in operation successfully  controlling  emissions from the Boiler No. 5 pulver-
ized coal  fired unit rated at  450,000  LB/HR of steam.  Bags are  made  of 22-
ounce felted "Ryton" and  cleaning is accomplished only  as  required via a low
pressure-moderate volume,  pulse-jet technique.

     This paper describes the system and covers the operating experiences with
this installation  during the  first  15 months  of  operation.  Data on  outlet
particulate emissions, pressure  drop, and cleaning cycles  is presented.
INTRODUCTION

     Energy availability  considerations and cost  projections  motivated Coors
to proceed  with their  second  coal fired  boiler  (Unit  No.  5)  in  late 1976.
This unit was  scheduled for start-up and went into service in November, 1979.
In the installation of this coal fired boiler,  it was important to the Company
that not only  permit  requirements were met, but that emissions were minimized
to the  lowest  levels  possible  with current technology.   However,  both space
and capital dollars were  at a premium  to  accomplish these objectives.  After
study and careful  consideration,  a pulse-jet type modular system,  offered by
Carter-Day  of  Minneapolis,  was  selected to  control particulate  emissions.
This modular  system was  ordered  in April,  1978,  and went  into service with
the boiler  in  November,  1979.  It has operated successfully  for the last 15
months.
                                   120

-------
BOILER DESCRIPTION

     The boiler  is a  Combustion  Engineering  pulverized coal  VU-40 type unit
rated at  450,000  LB/HR  of  steam  at 825  PSIG and 850°F.  Coal is pulverized
with  three  Raymond  RB-613  bowl  mills.   A  large fin  tube  boiler feedwater
economizer  is  utilized  to  cool  the flue  gas  to within the temperature range
of  300°F  to 360°F depending upon  boiler  load.   The boiler was designed for,
and operates with,  a 3 to 1 turn-down capability.

BAGHOUSE MODULE DESCRIPTION

     The basic configuration of  the Carter-Day Model  376 RF10  high  temperature
unit  is illustrated  in Figure  1.  Each  circular unit  has  376 oval  pattern
bags, 10  feet long  for a  filter  area  of 4800  sq.  ft. per module.  (The 12
module  system  has 4512  bags and  a filter  area of 57,600 sq.  ft.)  Bags are
installed over and supported by carbon  steel  9-gauge wire frame cages.  Fly-
ash  cake  is accumulated on  the  outside  of the  bags  and the filtered flue gas
leaves  at the  top of the  units  and goes  to  the induced draft  fan and stack.
Bags  are  installed or removed through  the top  clam  shell  doors at the top of
the units.

      Bags are  made of 22-ounce  per square yard  "Daytex"  felted fabric.  This
fabric  is essentially felted and  needled  "Ryton" fibers on a  "Gortex" scrim.
"Ryton" is  the trademark name which Phillips Petroleum has  given to Polypheny-
lene  Sulfide.  This  material has  both  excellent acid resistance and tempera-
ture  resistant characteristics up to 370°F.

      Cleaning  of the filter  cake  from  the outside of the bags  is accomplished
by  opening  the diaphragm valve  at the  top of the unit and discharging the 7.5
PSIG  reservoir tank into the  inside of  the bags directly under the nozzles on
the  distribution  manifold.   Each  reservoir tank is  charged  to 7.5 PSIG by  a
Miehle-Dexter  Model  Number  46-4006 positive  displacement  blower.  Since each
module  has  its own blower,  tank,  valve, etc.,  the  reliability of  the overall
system  is  quite  good.  Tripping of the  diaphragm valve is signaled by a pres-
sure  switch  mounted on the  reservoir tank.   The  distribution  manifold is
turned  at  one  rotation  per  minute during cleaning via  a small h HP motor and
gear  box  to the side of the diaphragm  valve.   When  in  the cleaning mode, the
diaphragm valve pulses approximately every 3.7 seconds.

BAGHOUSE INSTALLATION AND  AUXILIARIES

      To insure a  good,  economical  and  easy  to operate and maintain system,
considerable  thought and  engineering went  into the  installation.  Figures  2
and  3  show the  basic module installation configuration.  The  inlet and  out-
let  plenums were  designed to  balance  the  distribution to each module and  keep
the  ductwork  free of ash  drifts.   In  order to minimize troublesome and  expen-
sive  expansion  joints,  all  modules and  some flue ducts are supported by  hang-
ing  rods  which allow adequate movement  due to  thermal  expansion.  The  entire
system  has  only  10 expansion  joints.   Each module has  a minimum  leakage  type
outlet  damper, which can be operated  remotely from the control room to  either
take  a  module  off-line  or  to accomplish  off-line  cleaning.  When  this  damper
                                     121

-------
    CEA-Carter-Day RF376 FILTER
  FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE FLY ASH
 COLLECTION IN INDUSTRIAL-UTILITY
       COAL-FIRED BOILERS
    DRIVE MOTOR
 FOR REVERSE PULSE
AIR CLEANING SYSTEM
      DIAPHRAGM
        VALVE
AIR RESERVOIR TANK
FOR REVERSE PULSE
AIR CLEANING SUPPLY
 FILTER TUBE SHEET
 FOR HOLDING FILTER
TUBE CAGE ASSEMBLY
   CEA-Carter-Day
DAYTEX FILTER TUBES
    AIR INLET
   COLLECTED
  PARTICULATE
    OUTLET
          FACTORY INSTALLED
        INSULATED TOP ACCESS
          DOORS FOR FILTER
       TUBE INSPECTION/SERVICE
          HIGH TEMPERATURE
           ACID-RESISTANT
             GASKETING
               CLEAN
             AIR OUTLET
             CLEANING AIR
              MANIFOLD
                                                              NOTE:
                                                      FILTER BODY AND HOPPER
                                                         INSULATED IN FIELD
                                                           HOPPER ACCESS
                                                           HOLE NOT SHOWN
          60° CONICAL HOPPER
        FIGURE  1 MODULE GENERAL CONFIGURATION
        ~"~""~~~                   122

-------
U>
            FIGURE 2   PLAN VIEV! OF MODULE ARRANGEMENT
                       ILLUSTRATING INLET PLENUM

-------
FIGURE 3
SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF MODULE ARRANGET£MT ILLUSTRATING
BY-PASS VALVES, INLET PLENUM, OUTLET PLENUM, MODULE SUPPORT
RODS, AID CONFIGURATION OF BUILDING ENCLOSURE.

-------
1S closed, a  small  valve at  the  top of the  unit  opens, automatically letting
air  in  to  purge that particular  module  and prevent  acid corrosion   Each
module  is  equipped with  a manually  operated  inlet  damper  for use when that
module  is in a maintenance  mode.  There  are two 60-inch diameter bypass poppet
type  valves  in the  system which  are used during start-up  and oil firing of
the  boiler.   These  bypass  valves are operated from  the  control  room and can
open against 40 inches W.G.  pressure.

     The conical ash  hoppers  are  insulated  with 10 inches of MT-8 mineral wool
insulation and  electric blanket heaters are used  on the bottom 3'-6" portion
of  the  cone to insure that the flyash  will  stay  dry and convey easily.  The
main  portion  of the module and  all  flue ducts are  insulated with  4 inches of
MT-8  mineral  wool  insulation.   The modules  and  flue ducts  were metal lagged
with  "Reynolds Rainlock  Rib" diamond embossed aluminum 0.0165 inches thick.
The  conical  hoppers,  and other difficult areas, were lagged with flat diamond
embossed  aluminum  0.025 inches thick.   High  ash level alarms are installed in
each hopper.

      Because  of the  location of the  facility (adjacent  to  the main entrance
and  visitors area of the plant), an  enclosure was  built  for the  facility to
satisfy aesthetic considerations.  This enclosure is shown in  Figures 2 and 3.

      An opacity meter (Lear  Siegler  RM-41) is installed in the 13 foot diam-
eter stack  downstream of  the  baghouse and   induced draft  fan.   Readout of
opacity in the  control  room  is  located so  as to be easily visible from the
baghouse operator panel.

      The  operator panel for the  baghouse,  located  in  the control room, has the
following features:

      1.   Pressure drop across the  baghouse (inlet plenum to  outlet plenum) is
           displayed  on a meter.   The operator can  select  the high pressure
           that  he wants  cleaning to  start at and  the  low pressure where he
          wants cleaning to cease on this meter.

      2.   Temperature of  the flue  gas going to the baghouse  is displayed on  a
           meter on the control panel.

      3.   Conditions  of either high baghouse pressure drop or high  temperature
           are alarmed via red lights and  buzzers.

      4.   The  module outlet  dampers  can be either closed or opened  from this
           panel  to  isolate a module  or accomplish  off-line  cleaning.   Damper
           position is  indicated by status lights.

      5.   Bypass  valves  can  be  opened or  closed  from  this  panel.   Status
           lights  indicate their location at all times.

      6.   The  status  of  which modules  are in the clean mode  is  indicated on
           this panel  to the operator via  blower motor  running status lights.
                                     125

-------
     The total installed turn-key cost of this 12 module system,  including  the
enclosure  building,  was  approximately $2,500,000,  or roughly  $8 per  design
ACFM.

BAG CLEANING CYCLE LOGIC

     During the  design  phase, Coors engineers and  Carter-Day engineers mutu-
ally agreed  to set up  the  system so that normally,  cleaning would be  accom-
plished only  as  needed  to enhance bag  life,  blower life,  and to  save energy.
The blower and  manifold turning mechanism motors on all modules would come on
when the pressure across the baghouse reached the high set point (for example,
5  in. W.G.).  The  modules would be  in  the clean mode until the pressure drop
across the baghouse  reached the lower set point (for example, 2 in. W.G.) and
cleaning would  cease  until  the pressure built up to the high set  point  again.
Shortly  after start-up,  this  was  found to not  be  very  practical  because the
cleaning was  so effective  that the pressure  drop  across  the baghouse would
drop from  5  in.  W.G.  to 2 in. W.G.  in  only 20 to 30  seconds  and the stack
opacity became higher than desirable for a short period  of time.

     To  reduce  the effect of this problem and to  insure that nearly all bags
get pulsed when a  module is  cleaned,  the PLC  (programmable logic computer)
software was  changed to clean  only 4 modules  at  a  time  and  run  the  clean
mechanism  for 5 minutes  at a time.   Using this  scheme, 8  modules are  always
in  the  passive  no-clean  mode.   The  four modules  cleaned  are  sequentially
stepped  by the  software so that each  module  gets  the same number of 5  minute
clean  cycles  over a  period of time.  This cleaning method on  a demand basis
has worked well  over the current operating range of the boiler  (150,000 LB/HR
to 400,000  LB/HR of steam).  Generally, the baghouse  is  in the no clean mode
with none of the  12 clean blowers running 50% to 70% of the time.

EMISSION TESTS

     Emission tests  were performed at the stack of this unit on  April  17 and
April 18, 1980,  as part  of  the Compliance Tests  required on  the permit for
this coal  fired  boiler.   The results of the EPA Method No.  5 particulate tests
are shown  in  Figure 4.   The average of the three tests via F Factor method is
.023  LB  per  million  BTU particulate (roughly \ of the  permit  requirements.)
Since this ratio is energy rate dependent, data  is also presented  with respect
to the energy  bases of steam rate out and coal consumed.

     The coal burned during the compliance tests  had a heating value of  10,700
BTU per LB., a moisture content of 13.64%, an ash content of 5.89%, and  a sul-
fur content of 0.53%, all on an  as-received basis.  This coal comes from Routt
County, Colorado.

     During operation of this unit, the plume has been essentially non-visible
day-in and day-out to a human observer.
                                    126

-------
     COMPLIANCE TESTS ON BOILER NO. 5
         ADOLPH COORS COMPANY
       (DATA PER EPA METHOD NO. 5)

PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
(BASED ON F FACTOR)
PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
(BASED ON STEAM RATE)
PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE
(BASED ON COAL RATE)

BOILER STEAM OUTPUT
ACTUAL VOLUME OF
FLUE GAS THRU FILTER
AIR TO CLOTH RATIO
TEST #1
4-17-80
1200-1355
0.01 9 LB
106BTU
0.01 8 LB
1Q6BTU
0.01 9 LB
106BTU
405,000 LB
HR
276,000
ACFM
4.79
TEST #2
4-18-80
0902-1047
0.031 LB
1Q6BTU
0.029 LB
106BTU
0.021 LB
1Q6BTU
420,000 LB
HR
293,000
ACFM
5.08
TEST #3
4-18-80
1240-1424
0.01 8 LB
1Q6BTU
0.01 6 LB
1Q6BTU
0.01 6 LB
106BTU
420,000 LB
HR
288,000
ACFM
5.00
AVG. OF
3 TESTS
.023 LB
1Q6BTU
.021 LB
106BTU
.019LB
106BTU




FIGURE 4   EMISSION TEST RESULTS
                127

-------
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE WITH SYSTEM

     During  the  first 15  months of operation,  this  system has operated  very
well and  up to  expectations.   All felted  "Ryton"  bags have maintained  their
integrity  and  there  have been  no  bag failures.  All  mechanical  components
have  functioned  without  failure or repair except for  a few  cases with  the
diaphragm  valves.   On  a  few  occasions,  they would  stick  and require  some
minor  repair,  which generally  consisted of replacing  the  coil spring in  the
valve  and  adjusting it.   This  was accomplished by the boiler operator  on  duty
in about 10 minutes.

     The  clean  only-as-required and  clean only  4 modules  at  a time  (1/3 of
the 12 modules) has generally worked well throughout the current normal opera-
ting  range of the  boiler (150,000  LB/HR  to  400,000  LB/HR), maintaining  the
pressure  drop  across the  baghouse within  the range of  2.5  to  5 inches W.G..
Through  experience,  it  has  been found that  operation at a  pressure   drop
greater than 6  inches  W.G. causes fine  flyash to be driven  through  the felted
"Ryton"  causing  a  higher than  desired  opacity.   It  has   also  been  learned
that  at  air-to-cloth  ratios,   slightly above  approximately 5  to  1,  on-line
cleaning  is not effective  over a long period of time in cleaning and  discharg-
ing  the flyash  from  the bags  because  of  reintrainment of   fine flyash.   This
reintrainment  causes  the pressure  drop   across  the  baghouse  to   gradually
increase.   Operation  at higher  than  roughly  5  to 1  air to cloth  ratios or
recovery  from  a  high  pressure  drop  requires occasional  off-line  cleaning.
Currently,  this  is  done by the boiler operator in the control  room  by  closing
the module outlet  damper during cleaning.  Eventually, we plan to incorporate
this  feature automatically  via  software   logic  in the  PLC computer.   These
techniques  have  worked  quite  well   in bringing  the  baghouse back  into an
acceptable  pressure drop  range without taking  any  other  corrective action
such as reducing  boiler  load.

02/13/81
re/2U
                                    128

-------
                 SELECTION AND OPERATION OF  BAGHOUSES AT
                       R. D. NIXON  STATION,  UNIT  #1

            By:       R. C. Hyde
                      JOY Manufacturing Company
                      4565 Colorado Boulevard
                      Los Angeles,  California  90039

                      J. Arello
                      Lutz,  Daily & Brain, Consulting Engineers
                      6400 Glenwood
                      Overland Park, Kansas  66204

                      D.  J.  Huber
                      City of Colorado Springs
                      Ray D. Nixon Power Plant
                      Fountain,  Colorado  80817

                                  ABSTRACT

     This paper discusses  the selection criteria and the subsequent success-
ful operation of two (2)  baghouses placed in service at the R.  D.  Nixon
Station,  Unit #1.  These baghouses serve one (1) 220 MW boiler  and have been
in continuous service since April, 1980.

     This paper  identifies the specification criteria deemed most important
for a successful baghouse installation  and reviews the architect's decision-
making process  in selection of this  type of  air pollution control equipment.
Results  from the first eight  (8)  months of operation are presented including
pressure drop,  opacity, outlet emission, etc.

     To  date,  the unit has operated with low outlet  emissions  and low pres-
sure drop  (3-4  inches, W.C.).  Additionally, start-up,  shut-down, and main-
tenance  procedures  are discussed.


                                 INTRODUCTION

                                                                        re-
      Forecasted load growth and replacement of ret ired
 quired  that  the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado install additional  elect
 rical generating capacity.  On April 4, 1980  the Ray D. Nixon ^Jlant,
 Unit #1  located in Fountain, Colorado, some 17 miles south of Colorado
 Brings;  "began commercial production of 220 ^ of electrical energy   The
 power'piant'design engineering was undertaken by Lutz  Daily J Brain.
 Equipment located at the plant includes a Babcock & Wilcox ^^  £
 per hour  steam generator, General Electric 220 MW turbine generator and
 JOY Manufacturing Company "THERM-0-FLEX" baghouse system.


                     AIR POLLUTION CONTROL CONSIDERATIONS

      The steam generator purchased by  the City of Colorado Springs was a ba-
                                     129

-------
lanced draft, pulverized coal fired unit.  The unit was designed  to  burn  a
low sulfur Western coal with a typical coal and ash composition as follows:

             Coal Analysis, %             Ash Analysis, %

             Moisture      28.11      Phosphorus            0.85
             Carbon        50.19      Silica               29.83
             Hydrogen       3.54      Ferric oxide          4.88
             Nitrogen       0.67      Alumina              15.75
             Chlorine       0.01      Titania               1.18
             Sulfur         0.32      Lime                 23.52
             Ash            4.87      Magnesia              5.00
             Oxygen        12.29      Sulfur trioxide      15.31
                                      Potassium oxide       0.35
                                      Sodium oxide          1.09
                                      Undetermined          2.24

     When  the Utility used a low sulfur Western fuel and acquired an
Environmental Construction Permit prior to the enactment of a
more stringent state sulfur dioxide requirement, the installation of a
wet scrubber was averted.  However, it was recognized that a reliable and ef-
ficient particulate collection device would be required in order to operate
within compliance of the newly adopted New Source Performance Standards.
This meant a reduction in outlet emissions to a value no greater
than 0.1 Ib per million Btu heat input.  It was also felt that although the
requirements for sulfur dioxide removal were forestalled, the ever-changing
regulations may dictate installation at a later date.  A design philosophy
was therefore established.  An efficient particulate removal system would be
specified and provisions for incorporation of sulfur dioxide removal equip-
ment would be made.

     The state of the art in particulate removal for low sulfur Western coal
during the period in which the R.D. Nixon Station was in design was either a
hot side precipitator or a gas conditioned cold side unit.   However,  the
Utility's experience with both of these particulate control devices at the
Martin Drake Station spawned interest in an investigation of a fabric filter
collector, more commonly referred to as a baghouse.  Little was known of this
newcomer to the utility industry and a careful review of the few utility in-
stallations was made.  After an exhaustive study, most of the skepticism con-
cerning the use of the fabric filter subsided and a decision was made to is-
sue two separate sets of design specifications.  One set would incorporate
the installation of a hot side electrostatic precipitator on which the utility
had experience, and the other set of specifications would be for a fabric
filter collector.  Both sets of specifications announced the intent that bids
were being taken for both a hot side precipitator and a baghouse, only one of
which would be purchased by the Utility after a through evaluation.

                           BAGHOUSE SPECIFICATIONS

     As a review was made into the possible operating parameters the baghouse
would encounter,  a specification started to evolve.  The filter materials
must be capable of withstanding the flue gas temperatures encountered in-

                                    130

-------
eluding excursions.  This entailed  the use  of  fiberglass  filtering material
In order to reduce wear during cleaning  a reverse  gas  cleaning system in lieu
of a shaker or pulse jet was  specified.  Coupled with  the reverse gas clean-
ing system, came the decision that  the ratio of gas volume  to cloth area
should be kept low in an effort  to  extend the  time between  cleaning cycles
thereby increasing bag life.  This  would have  an additional benefit of an
overall reduced pressure drop.

     After reviewing the various air-to-cloth  ratios and  their relationships
to the baghouse size and cost, a 1.9:1 gross air-to-cloth ratio was chosen.
In recognizing the size and possible  problems  with one unit, a minimum of two
baghouse units would be required.   To keep  the unit operational at a conserv-
ative air-to-cloth ratio during  periods  of  compartment cleaning or maintenance,
the air-to-cloth ratio was specified  to  not exceed 2.1:1  during a period of
two compartments off-line.  This required more compartmentalization but in-
sured that enough bag material would  be  available  for  safe  operation.

     In an attempt to provide a  safe  and dependable system, other features in-
corporated into the specification included  a compartment  door interlock sys-
tem which prevented unauthorized entrance and  weather  protection by hopper
and penthouse enclosures.  Another  important concern during the operation of
the units was the consequences of an  upset  condition,  i.e.  high temperature
or pressure.  A bypass was incorporated  into the design in  response to the up-
set requirements.

     The bypass required the  tightness of a guillotine but  the response of a
louver.  After a review of various  dampers  available,  a double louver system
was chosen.  In order to maintain zero  leakage a vent  opening was placed in
the center thereby allowing ambient air  to  leak into the  bypass instead of
particulate laden gases through  the dampers.

     In order to deter proposals from baghouse manfacturers who were inexper-
ienced in the operation of utility  boilers, proposals  were  accepted from
qualified manufacturers only. A qualified  supplier was one having at least
one unit of a size capable of handling gases of a  quantity  equal to or great-
er than 100,000 ACFM on a utility boiler.   As  a result, bids were received
from three manufacturers.  The experience requirement  and conservative  spec-
ification notwithstanding, some  skepticism  still remained.

                  SELECTION OF TYPE OF EQUIPMENT AND VENDOR

     As bids were received, a careful review was made  of  the qualified bid-
ders and a separate evaluation was  performed for the precipitators and bag-
houses.  Items evaluated included pressure  drop, power consumption, operat-
ing and maintenance cost, escalation, etc.  As a result of  the evaluation,
Western Precipitation was evaluated low  bidder on  both the  precipitator and
baghouse.  These two  (2) particulate  collection  devices were again evaluated a-
gainst each other with a resulting  cost  difference, based on a ten-year life,
of $305,754 in favor of the fabric  filter.  The  evaluation  was based on a two-
year life of the filter bags  and maximum pressure  loss through the baghouse.
It is now evident with the number of  baghouses in  operation that  these  as- ^
sumptions were quite conservative resulting in a greater  cost difference be

                                      131

-------
tween the two devices.

     It was also recognized that the psychological advantages of very low
opacity with a baghouse, irrespective of load, coal or operating procedures
is difficult to assess monetarily and because of the experience with both
hot and cold side precipitators at the Martin Drake Station, there was some
doubt of the precipitator's ability to perform continuously in a satisfactory
manner at the high collection efficiency required.

     Therefore a difficult decision was made; purchase a pollution control
device which did not have a significant amount of operating time but which
promised to be the state of the art in particulate collection.

                     CHRONOLOGY OF BAGHOUSE INSTALLATION

     An award was made to JOY Manufacturing Company, Western Precipitation
Division on August 10, 1976 for the purchase of two (2) baghouses.  The con-
tract encompassed design, fabrication, erection and start-up of the bag-
houses.  Milestones achieved during the performance of this work are shown
below:

            Purchase Order:                       August, 1976
            Completion of Engineering:            January, 1978
            Commence Material Shipments:          March, 1978
            Mobilization at Job Site:             February, 1978
            Completion of Material Shipments:     June, 1978
            Completion of Erection:               August, 1979
            Initial Start-up:                     March, 1980
            Commercial Operation:                 April, 1980

                         BAGHOUSE SELECTION CRITERIA

     The baghouse system selected to filter flue gases emanating from the
boiler is described as follows:

       Total Flue Gas Flow Rate:                        1,071,600 ACFM
       Temperature:                                     295*F
       Inlet Particulate Concentration:                 5.25 gr/ACF
       Maximum Sulfur Content:                          1.5%
       Guaranteed Outlet Particulate Concentration:     .0074 gr/ACF
       Efficiency:                                      99.86%
       Number of Baghouses:                             2
       Compartments Per Baghouse:                       18
       Filter Bags
          Quantity/Compartment:                         156
          Quantity/Baghouse:                            2808
          Material:                              Fiberglass, Teflon coating
          Size (Nominal):                        12 in. X 31 ft. - 9 in.
       Total Filter Area* (2 baghouses):                542,650 ft2
       Gross Air-to-Cloth Ratio:                        1.97:1
       Net Air-to-Cloth Ratio:                          2.09:1
       Net/Net Air-to-Cloth Ratio** :                   2.22:1
 *  excluding cuffs and seams
**  with four (4) compartments out for cleaning and maintenance
                                    132

-------
                       BAGHOUSE SEQUENCE OF OPERATION

     The baghouse system supplied to the Utility was similar to that applied
at the Sunbury Steam Electric Station of Pennsylvania Power and Light Company
i.e.  fiberglass filter media with straight reverse air cleaning.  Sunbury was'
the first electric utility to control steam generator emissions with a bag-
house and had been in successful operation since February 1973.  The reverse
air cleaning concept can be broken down into four (4) distinct operations.

1.   Filtering - Dirty flue gas enters compartment hoppers through the ser-
     vice damper.  The gas flowing from the inside to the outside of the
     filter media is relieved of particulate.  Clean gas then passes through
     the outlet dampers and exits the baghouse through the outlet plenum.

2.   Settling - The first phase of the cleaning cycle begins as the gas out-
     let dampers in one compartment close.  This establishes a "no-flow" or
     settle period in the compartment, allowing some of the captured partic-
     ulate to descend into the hoppers for removal.

3.   Reverse Air Cleaning - Gas flow is reversed through the bags when the
     reverse air damper is opened exposing the section to positive pressure
     from the clean side of the bags.  Reverse air is provided by a fan
     which draws hot filtered gas from the baghouse outlet plenum.  If nec-
     essary this reverse air period can be followed by another dust settling
     period and then another reverse air period before the section is return-
     ed to the filtering mode.

     To return the compartment to the normal filtering mode, the reverse air
     damper is closed and the gas outlet dampers opened.  These two (2) out-
     let dampers are opened on a staggered basis and with very slow cylinder
     travel to reinflate the filter bags gently and avoid "popping" which
     can occur if the filtering elements are returned to full flow service
     instantaneously.

4.   Isolation - By closing the reverse air damper, gas outlet dampers and
     service damper, the compartment can be completely isolated from the gas
     stream.  When the upper and lower access doors are opened, fresh ambient
     air flows freely through the compartment.  Personnel can then enter for
     inspection or maintenance.

                          BAGHOUSE DESIGN FEATURES

     The design features deemed most important to the eventual successful
operation of the baghouses are enumerated below.  These items were either
specified by the Architect/Engineer or offered as the manufacturer's stand-
ard design.

1.   Low Inlet Velocity to Compartments - Flue gas is introduced into the
     compartments at velocities less than 15 fps.  This allows fallout of
     larger dust particles prior to contact with the filtering elements,
     minimizes abrasion and reduces pressure losses.


                                      133

-------
 2.    Stepped Thimble Floor - In conjunction with  the  low velocity inlet the
      stepped thimble floor promotes even dust distribution  across the com-
      partment, which extends filter life.

 3.    12" Long Thimbles - Thimbles of one bag diameter were  supplied  to min-
      imize abrasion as the flue gas enters each bag.  Thimbles are welded  in
      place to ensure a 100% seal in the clean/dirty interface.   Bags are at-
      tached to thimbles with no tools, reducing potential for damage during
      installation.

 4.    Ample Bag Spacing - 14" center-to-center spacing between bags ensures
      that adjacent bags will not touch, eliminating a common mode  of bag
      failure.

 5.    Ratchet Tensioner - A "no-tool" stainless steel tensioner provided  to
      allow quick, precise tensioning of filtering elements.

 6.    Enclosed Access - All devices requiring routine maintenance  (pneumatic
      operators, high ash level detectors, etc.) are enclosed.

 7.    Fiberglass Filter Bags - Fiberglass filtering bags, 12" in diameter,
      31'-9" long were provided.  Bags supplied weighed 10 oz./yd.^ and in-
      cluded a 10% Teflon coating to resist the corrosive and abrasive poten-
      tial in the flue gas.  Seven (7) anti-collapse rings were provided a-
      long the length of the bag to ensure an open path for dust to flow dur-
      ing cleaning and to minimize fold lines in the fabric which can become
      points of failure.

                      START-UP OF THE BAGHOUSE SYSTEM

      The boiler was initially fired on oil during December 1979 and January
 1980  to complete the boiler boilout and steam blows.   During this initial
 firing of the boiler, the baghouse was bypassed.   While on bypass, the vent
 hatches for the compartments were opened slightly to allow outside air to
 enter the compartment and exit-through the partially open outlet valve.
 This  eliminated the possibility of any damaging flue gas entering the com-
 partments and also protected against condensation.

      It was found through experience that if the  compartments were closed
 up tight, considerable condensation occurred.

     On Monday,  March 3,  following completion of  the baghouse checkout, bag-
house "B"  was first put  in service.   To approximate design air-to-cloth
ratios, only a portion of the baghouse was put in service.   The boiler was
operated at approximately 35% load,  70-80 MW's, hence 10 of 36 total com-
partments were initially  cut in.   Since the fixed point in the baghouse
structure is located in the center,  the baghouse  compartments were brought
into service beginning with the center compartments and working toward the
outboard compartments.   This was  done in an attempt to have the baghouse
expand outward from the fixed points.   By maintaining design air-to-cloth
ratios, the individual compartments  were heated more quickly and conden-
sation/ dewpoint concerns  were minimized.  As the  temperature of these com-

                                    134

-------
partments stablized, the remaining  compartments were  added.  Within 45 min-
utes, the entire  B  baghouse was in  service.  After  the  initial bleed
through of particles, the filter cake formed on the bags  and the opacity
stabilized at 2.5%  .  On Tuesday, March  4,  at  9:00-a.m. the "B" baghouse was
cleaned for the first time.  After  one complete cleaning  cycle, the differ-
ential pressure dropped to 0.9" water column.
"A"
     On Tuesday, March 4, load was  increased  to approximately 65% and the
 'A" baghouse was put in service using  the  same procedure.  Both baghouses
were then cleaned on Thursday, March 6, when  the differential pressure for
"A" baghouse was 4.1" water column  and the differential pressure for "B"
baghouse was 5.2" water column.  After cleaning unit "A", the differential
pressure dropped to 0.7" water column  and  unit "B" dropped to 1.1" water
column.  The unit was at 120MW or 60%  load at this point.  The operating
temperature of the unit ranged from 300 F  to  330 F.

     Once full load operation was attained, a continuous cleaning cycle was
initiated.

     The unit was declared commercial  on April 1, 1980.  Since that time the
unit has been base loaded at 220 MW generally between 8:00 a.m. and midnight.
From midnight to 8:00 a.m. the load is normally dropped to 50-80%.

                     PERFORMANCE OF THE BAGHOUSE SYSTEM

Particulate Emissions

     Tests were conducted at both the  inlet and outlet of the baghouse sys-
tem since system efficiency, rather than an outlet emission, was guaranteed.

     All particulate tests were performed  according to E.P.A. Method 17 pro-
cedures as described in the February 23, 1978, Federal Register.  This pro-
cedure uses a pitot tube alongside  the filter holder or thimble holder to
measure the gas velocity at the sampling points for the calculation of
isokinetic sampling.  The tests consisted  of  240 minutes of sampling time
with 48 test points per duct on the inlet  and 10 minutes sampling time for
24 test points at the stack.

     In order to conduct the tests  at  the  design net air-to-cloth ratio of
2.09:1 a measurement of the gas volume was performed before each test
to determine the number of compartments to remove from service.  Two  (2) com-
partments were removed from service per unit, before the first and third
tests, and three (3) compartments per  unit before the second test.

     A summary of the particulate test results is contained in Table #1.
All inlet test values contained in  the table are composites of the "A" & "B"
baghouse inlet test runs.  Values expressed in dry standard cubic feet, DSCF,
are based on 70°F and 29.92" Hg.  Efficiencies were based on the measured
inlet and outlet concentrations expressed  in gr/DSCF.  These measurements
for the three (3) tests were respectively:  99-94%, 99.90%, and 99.93%.
                                     135

-------
     Each test consisted of nearly simultaneous runs on the north and  south
inlet ducts and the stack.  All tests were conducted during normal operation
at full boiler production.  No changes were made to the fabric filter  clean-
ing schedule.  Boiler soot blowing was conducted during the tests.

                                   TABLE 1

Test Number                11         22         33
Location                Inlet    Outlet    Inlet    Outlet    Inlet    Outlet
Temperature (°F)         295      302       299      302       302       303
Particulate
Emission (gr/ACF)        1.80    0.0011    1.73     0.0017     2.02    0.0015
Particulate
Emission (gr/DSCF)       3.39    0.002     3.28     0.0032     3.84    0.0028
Efficiency                       99.94              99.90              99.93

     Outlet emissions on similar installations have ranged from the above
level to 0.01 gr/ACF.

Pressure Drop

     The average pressure drop across the fabric filter during the tests was
3.5" water column.  It ranged from 3.8" to 4.1" on the north or "A" unit and
3.1" to 3.2" on the south or "B" unit.  The measured concentration of  the
north inlet was greater on all tests than the south inlet by 12. to 26%.  The
higher grain loading noted on the north unit influences the higher pressure
drop noted.

Opacity

     The opacity at the stack during the test program was approximately four
(4) percent.

     Stack opacity consistently ranges from 2-4% with no visible emissions.

Temperature Drop

     With an average inlet temperature of 300-325°F temperature drop across
the baghouse system is 10-12°F.

Filter Bag Failures

     Since the initial start-up, it has been necessary to replace a total of
seven (7) bags.  These were all due to cuts, etc. and can be attributed to
the installation.

                    OPEBATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS

1.   One of the most time consuming problems with the baghouse is the  main-
tenance and operation of the key interlock system.  The Nixon baghouse has  36
compartments:  each compartment has two (2) upper doors and two (2) lower doors
plus one door on the hopper totaling 180 doors.  Each compartment has  four  (4)

                                    136

-------
dampers (1-inlet, 1-reverse air,  2-outlet)  totaling  144.  The doors and door
locks on the baghouse are of  the  highest  quality obtainable.  Because the locks
on these systems are not used regularly and because  of the extreme heating
and cooling and exposure to moisture  and  fly  ash, the locks and linkages
tend to bind up.  During a unit outage, when  it is necessary to open all doors
for inspection, opening and closing of the  baghouse  doors becomes a major
project.  We have found that  it takes two (2) men 16 hours to open or close all
doors.  To date, we have broken seven (7) keys on the interlock system due to
jamming.  The interlock system on the baghouse is a  carryover from the elect-
rostatic precipitator and it  is felt  that there is only limited need for such
a system on a baghouse.  Rather,  it would be  sufficient to simply provide a
means of padlocking dampers in the safe position for maintenance while on
line.  It should be noted that maintenance  of the baghouse while on line is
less dangerous than maintenance on other  power plant equipment, such as pul-
verizers, breakers, large motors, fans, etc., and that the real protection is
adherence to a good tagging and clearance procedure.  The Owner's recommend-
ation on future units would be to delete  the  key interlock system.

2.   An additional maintenance problem that has been experienced on the unit
is the expansion joints in the reverse air  system.   The design of the ex-
pansion joints was inadequate resulting in  the failure of said joints after
approximately four weeks of operation.  This  did not present an operational
problem in that cleaning the  bags was possible even with the expansion joints
completely missing on three sides. These expansion  joints were replaced by
Western Precipitation and again failed after  approximately four weeks of
operation.  A third generation of expansion joints,  specially designed and
manufactured by Western Precipitation, has  replaced  the purchased joints pre-
viously supplied.  These joints include revised mounting flanges which have
resolved the problem.

                                  CONCLUSIONS

      The success of the R.D.  Nixon installation, i.e. low outlet emissions,
low pressure drop and zero visible emissions  stems from a number of factors:

      1)   Conservative air-to-cloth ratio - 2.09:1 net.

      2)   Large number of compartments with comparatively few bags
          per compartment  (156).   This minimizes large-scale swings
          in a A P during cleaning and maintenance operations.

      3)   Sound engineering procedures regarding start-up, i.e. no
          precoat and bypass  during oil light-off.

      4)   Vigilant maintenance procedures.
                                     137

-------
                 POTENTIAL FOR  IMPROVEMENT  IN BAGHOUSE DESIGN

      By:   Robert  M.  Jensen, Bechtel Power  Corporation,  San Francisco, CA

                                   ABSTRACT

     This  paper  describes the potential for improvement  in design of large,
 structural,  reverse  air baghouses of the type  now being applied to remove
 fly  ash from large coal-fired power plants.  It is intended  to  demonstrate
 that some  currently acceptable and recommended design details  cause  unneces-
 sary pressure  loss,  increase the energy required  for  cleaning, and decrease
 bag  life.   In addition, the  discussion  indicates that these improvements are
 more significant for  the  utility industry than  for industrial users because
 of differences in  evaluation methods.


                                 INTRODUCTION

     The baghouse  designs under consideration are limited to  "large struc-
 tural"  or  "large custom design" baghouses, especially those now being used
 to remove  fly ash  from the flue gas of  large coal-fired power plants.  Shaker-
 cleaned  and pulse-jet baghouses  are not considered.   The  design  elements in
 need of  improvement are as follows.

 Hopper Fallout

     In  technical  literature, commercial brochures, and advertisements, hop-
 per  fallout is described  as  a desirable feature.   It  is  claimed  that hopper
 fallout  reduces  the  amount of material  to  be collected  by the bags, thus
 reducing cleaning  frequency and resulting in less cleaning energy and longer
 bag  life.   These claims may not be justified; in fact, the opposite may be
 true.

     The generally accepted  expression  for  fabric filtration pressure loss
 across the cloth and filter cake is:

                        AP = k  x C/7000 x t x Vn

Where:         AP = pressure loss in inches of water column
               k£ = a constant, in. wg -r (Ib/ft )(ft/min)
               Ci ~ inlet grain loading, grains/actual cu ft (ACF)
               t  = time in minutes between cleanings
               V  = cloth ratio in ft/rain
               n  = a number between 1 and 2.
                                     138

-------
     In using  this expression for pressure loss, it is customary to use th«
value of  k2  for the median  particle size in  the  filter  cake even though
it varies with particle density,  particle  size,  gas viscosity, and gas
temperature.   For  a given application  we can  assume  that particle  density
gas viscosity, and gas  temperature are  constants.                         '

     Particle  size distribution in  filter  cake and hopper fallout  has  been
reported  by  Robinson et al (1) and is reproduced in this paper as Figure 1.
The variation  of  k^ with particle size has been reported by Noll, et al (2)
and is  reproduced in this paper as Figure  2.   The median size  of particles
in the  cake, taken from Figure 1, is shown on Figure 2.  The median size of
particles  in the   inlet  gas  stream, assuming  15% wt fallout, is calculated
from Figure  1  and  shown on Figure  2.

     With no hopper fallout  kX  would be about  9.5,  as  opposed to  13 with
15% wt  fallout.   Applying this reduction as a percentage to a typical cloth
and cake  differential of 4 in. wg would reduce  the differential by approxi-
mately  1  in. wg.

     We  can hypothesize that the  representative value of kj, without hopper
fallout  is less; than with fallout due to the change in composition of the
filter  cake.  With hopper fallout the  particles in the cake are small and
are all in  a  narrow  size  range.   Small particles  pack into a low-porosity,
dense  cake.   Without hopper  fallout  the particles in the cake have a larger
median  size and a wide range of particle sizes.   Filter cake  with a wide
range  of particle sizes is more porous and has  a lower pressure loss than a
cake  entirely of  small  particles.   It also requires less cleaning energy.

      If  we  can design  an  improvement to eliminate hopper  fallout  we  can
reduce  pressure loss,  increase  bag life, and reduce both the frequency of
and the  energy required for  cleaning.

Redeposition

     As  dirty gas  rises in  a bottom inlet bag its vertical velocity dimin-
ishes.   In a 12-in. diameter, 30-ft  long bag  at a cloth ratio of 2 fpm, the
entering  velocity will be  about  240 fpm.   Near the  top  of the bag the
velocity  will approach zero.  This velocity reduction limits the ability of
the  gas to carry  particles upward  in the bag.   As a consequence, the bottom
inlet  bag serves  as  a  sort  of classifier, with the  fine fraction  of par-
ticles  accumulating in the top of the bag.

     During  reverse air cleaning  some  of the fines  at  the top of  the  bag
will have agglomerated and will fall out; some will adhere to the cloth;  and
some  will float in the top of the bag and again return to it as soon as the
bag comes back on line. The latter is called redeposition.

      If  we take a solid sphere of fly ash, 1/2 micron in diameter, 80 lb/
cu ft  specific density,  and  use  Stokes1 Law to  calculate its terminal
velocity  in  still air,  the particle will reach its terminal velocity in less
than  a  second.  At  that velocity the time to travel  30  ft  from the top of


                                      139

-------
the bag  to  the  hopper is approximately  1 year.   In  reality a single small
particle will never make the trip alone  because  its  fall  will be opposed by
the stack effect, or natural draft,  in the bag.

     We can assume that after a bag has been in service for a period of  time,
a certain portion  of  the fines in the top of the bag will be dislodged  and
returned to the  bag every cleaning cycle.  Obviously,  this  is not a cumula-
tive process because  the bags  do not plug solid.  Therefore, it is likely
that some combination of conditions  at  the top  of the bag releases  some
agglomerated fines during cleaning.

     A typical pressure  loss versus  time plot for a single bag or  compart-
ment is  shown  as curve A on Figure 3.  In our formula for AP we  can assume
that ki  = 50, C. =3,  n  = 2,  and using values for AP  and t  for points  on
curve fl  of  Figure  3,  we  can solve for V,  the cloth ratio.   A plot of  V
obtained in this way, versus time,  is shown  on  Figure 4.  Note  that  for
curve A  cloth ratio decreases with time.   We can assume that  the  cloth ratio
of  a bottom inlet  bag is variable and approaches zero near  the  top where
redeposited fines form an impermeable cake.   This cake blinds the top of the
bag and, in effect,  reduces its cloth area.   Thus redeposition results  in
increased pressure  loss  and filtering capacity of a conventional baghouse
compartment during  each  cleaning cycle.   The reduction must  be compensated
by  an  actual  cloth ratio for the baghouse  that  is higher than its design
cloth ratio.

     A  well-documented characteristic of  conventional baghouses  is the
gradual  increase of pressure loss  in new bags with  time in  service.  It
is  the  author's opinion that  this  is caused by  a decrease in filtering
capability  at the  top of the bag with steady usage  over an  extended time
period.  This gradual increase  in pressure loss probably  occurs at a  faster
rate as bag length increases.

     If we assume that 10% of the bag goes blind at the top there will be an
increase of 10%  in cloth ratio which will increase pressure loss by approxi-
mately 0.6 in. wg.

Spring Tension

     The notion  that  there  is a  single: correct tension for  each application
of  bottom  inlet bags  is not consistent with the actual necessity  to
re-tension  after the  bags have  been in service for a period of time.   It is
also inconsistent  with a type  of bag damage  caused by inadequate tension.

     A typical  spring might have a spring constant  of 40 Ib/in.   A 12-in.
diameter, 30-ft  long  bag might be installed  with 40 Ib of  tension by com-
pressing the  spring 1 in.   If  we assume that a  new bag weighs  10  Ib  (not
including the chain nor  the  cap, but  including the anti-collapse rings), we
find that tension  in  the warp fibers at the  top  of  the bag is 40 Ib while
tension at the bottom of the bag is 30 Ib.   If, during a  cleaning  cycle,  the
bag accumulates  30  Ib of particulate, the tension at the top of  the bag is
70 Ib while there is zero tension at the bottom.


                                     140

-------
     The so-called correct tension  is one  that  does not make the bag so taut
that it will not  clean, nor so slack that the  bottom of the bag will droop
over the top of  the thimble.  The  initial tension may satisfy these two
requirements at certain times, but it cannot always  be  adequate because the
bag's weight changes  during each cleaning cycle.  Moreover, the tension is
always greatest at the top of the bag and  least at the bottom.   During
reverse air cleaning the air flow  (clean gas  flow) is from  outside to inside
Cleaning is accomplished by:  a change  in  cloth shape,  which releases the
cake; reverse  flow through the  cloth, which also  helps  to  release  the cake;
and downflow in  the bag, which assists gravity in moving the released par-
ticulate to the hopper.

     Anti-collapse  rings,  spaced along the  length of  the  bag, are used to
limit  shape change.  The warp fibers change from straight to a catenary
shape between  the rings.  In cross section the fill fibers change from a
circular shape to a multi-lobed  ring with the least  diameter  midway between
the rings.   If tension is  too great these shape changes may not be adequate
to break the cake  loose.   If tension is too  little the  rounded, fluted lobes
may collapse into vertical creases and the diameter  between rings  may be so
small that  the fall of  the particulate  will  be  impeded  resulting in bag abra-
sion.   Because of this variation  in bag  tension, there is more need for
anti-collapse rings at  the bottom  of the bag, where tension is reduced, than
at  the  top where  tension  is  greatest.   Variable  tension and  the irregular
spacing of anti-collapse rings  in the bag cause unequal shape change during
cleaning.   As  a  result,  cleaning  effectiveness  is  not uniform  over the
length  of  the bag.

     We can assume that cleaning efficiency  is  greatest at  the bottom of the
bag where  there is a high  concentration of friable filter cake and a maximum
change  in  bag  shape.   The initial reverse flow cleans  the  bottom of the bag
which  then becomes the path of least  resistance for  the  balance  of the
reverse flow.  The top of  the bag has the  highest  tension,  the greatest
amount  of  cake,  and a  cake  composition that is  more difficult to remove.
Thus we have the  most  difficult cleaning  to do at the  top  of the  bag where
we have the poorest cleaning  efficiency.

     Another undesirable aspect  of spring  tension is bag stretch which makes
it necessary to re-tension the bags from  time to  time.  With  inadequate ten-
sion the bottom of the  bag hangs down on  the outside of the thimble and forms
a pocket  which collects particulate.  Motion of the bag causes the cloth  to
rub  against the  particulate resulting  in  abrasion in this  part of the bag.
When the  bag goes into the cleaning mode, the excess cloth at the  bottom  is
blown  to  the inside of  the  thimble where  it hangs down in  folds.   Material
falling down  the bag hits  one  side of these  folds, thus  causing  a second
kind of abrasion  on the same part of the  bag.  When the bag  is put back on
line it is blown  to  its  position hanging down outside  the thimble.   Ihe
incoming  flow  of  dirty gas  strikes the other  side of the folds,  causing  a
third  kind of  abrasion on  the  same cloth.   This scenario, illustrated by
Figure  5,  explains why  the bottom  of this  type of bag  is prone to  pmhoiing,
a very  common  type of  damage  leading to bag failure.
                                       141

-------
     A popular explanation maintains that pinholing  is  caused by high inlet
gas velocities as the gas enters the bottom of the bag.  One  remedy, assuming
that the cause is  high velocity, is to make the  thimbles  at  least  one bag
diameter in length.   The  vena contracta caused by  the entrance will  then
expire within the thimble and the flow leaving will be in streamlines  paral-
lel to the  cloth.   However,  although long thimbles  may be beneficial  they
cannot correct the  damage caused by loose, extra  cloth  at  the bottom of the
bag.  In addition,  there is  some evidence that gas velocity,   in the range of
200 to 300 fpm,  is  not the cause of pinholing.

     Pinholing at the  bottom of the bag may be aggravated by null periods.
Null periods  are short intervals during a cleaning  cycle when there  is no
pressure differential  across  the bags.   They are favored by  some suppliers
who insist  that  they provide an opportunity for  the particulate  to  settle
out.  This  theory  should  be  questioned for several reasons.   During a null
period the  only  force available to cause particles  to  settle is gravity,
which is not  adequate to  overcome the buoyancy of  gas in the compartment
when there  is a  thermal gradient from the bottom to the top.   If there is
any slack at the  bottom of the bag, the slack will hang down inside the bag,
as  shown by Figure  5,  but it will move down  at  the beginning of the null
period and  up e.t the  end of  the  null period.  This movement aggravates wear
on  this portion of  the bag.   Null periods also lengthen the cleaning cycle,
increasing  the length  of  time that cloth area is out of service, and  pro-
longing the pressure  loss increase  when a compartment  is off line for
cleaning.   Finally,  null periods increase the number of times a bag will be
flexed, which diminishes  bag life.   In sum, null periods  do  not help the
cleaning process, but rather  add to pressure loss, increase cleaning energy,
and diminish bag  life.

     In conclusion, spring tension is detrimental to bag life  and may be the
cause for particle  penetration.  It also contributes to uneven cleaning and
increased cleaning energy.

Recirculation

     The clean reverse flow  entering  the  compartment  during   reverse  air
cleaning becomes  a  dirty flow leaving the hopper  and entering  the inlet duct.
This dirty flow has to be cleaned by the on-line  compartments.  It is a flow
that has already  been cleaned and whose particulate has been previously col-
lected in other  compartments.   This  process of returning the reverse  flow
and some particulate to the  inlet duct is called  recirculation.

     The amount of  the  reverse flow is; determined by design and  included in
the so-called net  cloth ratio.   The amount of particulate  in the reverse
flow is  indeterminate.  Recirculation undoubtedly  entails pressure loss;
costs an  increment of bag  life; and uses an excessive amount of cleaning
energy.  If recirculation increases  the  grain loading at the inlet  to the
bags by  10%,  the  increase  in the  pressure  loss will  be  approximately
0.4 in. wg.
                                     142

-------
Ventilation

     Before workmen  may enter a  compartment for inspection or maintenance
work the  compartment must be  purged of gas, cooled to  a  tolerable tempera-
ture, and ventilated by fresh air.   This is usually done  by  closing  the
outlet, reverse  air, and inlet  dampers so that access  doors can be opened
After the access doors have been opened the inlet damper can be partially
opened so that outside air will be  sucked in to purge, cool,  and ventilate
the  compartment.  In  addition,   this  arrangement prevents the escape of
fugitive dust  from the  compartment.

     Without  a separate ventilation system, the outside  air drawn through
the  compartment  enters the inlet duct,   Air temperature is lower than gas
temperature  and  air may have  a  significant moisture content.   The ventila-
tion flow thus cools the gas  and may increase its moisture content.   This
can  be  detrimental to  the bags  and the  house  if the system is operating
near the  acid dew point.  Ventilation flow occurs at a time when the  cloth
area of  the baghouse has been reduced by taking a compartment off line and
is  added  to the normal flow,  thus  causing  an  increase in cloth  ratio and
pressure  loss.  These  disadvantages  are diminished if  the  baghouse  is
equipped with a  separate ventilation system.

     A  compartment may be off line  for several hours before  it is safe and
cool enough for workmen to  enter.  Work in the compartment may be a matter
of  minutes  or hours.   In any  case,  baghouse pressure loss is  increased for
the  duration of  the  outage.

     Some filter cakes are hygroscopic and will pick up  water from the air
during  a  compartment outage.  The resultant wet  cake, which may be somewhat
pozzolithic,  may set into a hard  cake, or glaze, when the bags come  back on
line.   During subsequent cleaning cycles some of this hard cake will  fall
off  and some will not.  The hard cake that remains will  be in patches with
sharp,  jagged edges.   Bag shape changes will be resisted by the remaining
hard patches  of  cake,  and fibers will be damaged by the jagged edges.

     This ventilation procedure  also makes  it necessary to subject the bags
and  the interior of the  compartment to two excursions  through the acid dew
point:   once on the way down  and  once on the way up  in temperature.   During
such excursions  through the dew  point, the  cloth, the thread used in making
the  bag,  and the  finish  on  the  cloth suffer some damage.  Damage varies in
relation  to the amount of  sulfur trioxide present in the cake on the  bags.
These  excursions will also result in  corrosion of bag hardware, access door
gaskets,  and the house.

     Ventilation is, thus,  a  cause  of pressure loss and  a detriment to bag
life.  These  shortcomings can  be alleviated by reducing the time  required to
prepare  for entry after the  access doors are  opened;  and by reducing the
time required to clean the tubesheet, remove defective  bags,  and  install new
bags.  With or without a separate ventilation system, a better procedure for
gaining access to  a  compartment  is one of the most needed design improvements,
                                      143

-------
Re-entrainment

     Some dust collector users store the collected material in the collector
hoppers for many  hours,  typically one or two  shifts of 8 hours.  With a
baghouse, this length  of  storage  will  span a number  of  cleaning  cycles.   As
an extreme example,  a  baghouse cleaning  cycle  might  cover  every  compartment
twice an hour and the storage might be for two shifts.  In this case material
collected during  32  compartment  cleanings would be  stored in the  hoppers.

     Depending on the  inlet grain loading and the hopper  size and shape,
the  level of  material  in the hopper may be  near the bottom  of  the  inlet
duct.   This would be likely in the  aforementioned  extreme case.  If  the
level of  stored material  is high, or if the inlet is baffled in a way that
turns the incoming gas flow downward,  material may be swept off  the  surface
of the  collected  material and redeposited on  the  bags.  This process  is
called  re-entrainment.   One  safeguard  against  re-entrainment  requires
emptying the  hoppers before the level  of stored  material gets too  high.   If
re-entrainment occurs, it  leads  to recollecting and recleaning which  once
again wastes time and energy; increases pressure loss; and decreases bag  life.

     If re-entrainment were to increase the grain loading at the inlet to the
bags by 5%, the pressure loss would increase about 0.2 in.  wg.

Rehandling

     In this description of potential design improvements,  it has been noted
that some of  the  particulate is  collected, removed  from  the  cloth, rede-
posited,  recirculated,  and  re-entrained.  We  might  call  these processes
rehandling.

     In Figure 6 the numbered circles are as follows:

1 -  The grain loading in the gas leaving the process; i.e.,  leaving the  air
     preheaters of a coal-fired power plant.
2 -  Hopper fallout.
3 -  Material collected in  the  bags and transferred to the hopper during a
     cleaning cycle.
4 -  The  fine particle sizes at the top of the bag which adhere to the bag
     or move off of  the bag at the start of cleaning and back on the bags at
     the end of cleaning, i.e. redeposition.
5 -  Particulate  in  the  reverse  flow  returned  to the  inlet  duct during
     reverse air cleaning,  i.e., recirculation.
6 -  The actual inlet  grain loading to  each compartment.  The sum  of No.  1
     and No. 5.
7 -  Material picked up  from the surface of material stored  in  the  hopper
     and redeposited on the bags, i.e.,  re-entrainment.

     This schematic  diagram illustrates  the number of ways and suggests the
number of times that particulate is handled and  rehandled.

     It takes energy to  move particulate around and to move  gas  through a
filter  cake.  If  particulate in the cake is collected  repeatedly, there  is

                                     144

-------
unnecessary energy loss that  could  be avoided through elimination of rede-
position,  recirculation,  and  re-entrainment.   Rehandling  also  entails
greater  cleaning  frequency, and  greater  bag abrasion, both  of which reduce
bag life.   The ideal baghouse design would provide for the  handling of a
particle only  once:   collect  it  once and transfer it  from  the bag to the
hopper once.

     Redeposition  at about  0.6 in.  wg, plus  recirculation at 0 4 in  we
added to re-entrainment at 0.2 in. wg., together with a hopper fallout pres-
sure loss  of  about  1 in. wg  give a total of  2.2  in.  wg,  which a  utility
would evaluate  at  approximately $2,000,000 for a 500-MW plant (3).

Conclusion

     Design improvements are  needed to reduce operating costs,  which are of
greater  concern for utility  applications than for most industrial applica-
tions.   Industrial users want a  fast payback; they do not evaluate baghouse
use  for  a 35  to 40 year equipment life.  Operating cost can be recovered in
the  selling price of their product which is not price-regulated by a public
commission.   As long  as all  baghouses  remain  so  similar in design and
operating  cost, the  industrial user has little incentive to  reduce operating
cost because  his  competition  is  buying the same kind of baghouse with  the
same capital and  operating costs.  He is  especially not interested in saving
operating  cost if  he must pay a higher capital cost.

     Utilities, on the  other  hand,  can add capital cost to  their  rate base
and  may  qualify for tax credit for purchasing pollution control equipment.
Utilities  are  very  concerned  with operating costs because they affect  the
selling  price  of  electricity  which  is regulated by a  public commission and
because  they have  to be evaluated for a 35 to 40 year  plant  life.

     When  the  market for coal-fired power plant baghouses  started  to develop
in the early  1970s,  the expedient method of supply was with  the conventional
baghouse designs  that  had been developed for the industrial  market.  Now, in
the  early  1980s,  at  a  time when there is  great emphasis on conserving energy
and  reducing  production  costs,  we are still  using the industrial baghouse
design for both industrial and utility applications.

     In  this   paper  the  author has attempted to  identify some potential
design improvements.  Although individual improvements may contribute only a
small  saving  of pressure  loss, it is possible that the total pressure loss
that  could be  saved would be significant.  Similarly, although individual
design  details may  contribute only  a small amount of bag damage, it is
possible that  improving a number of them  would  result  in  significantly
longer  bag life.   In  addition,  the  individual  corrections  may be syner-
gistic;  correcting one  deficiency may make it possible to correct another.
It is  the author's  hope that this paper will stimulate the development of
design improvements.
                                     145

-------
 3 uj go
               -SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN HOPPER FALLOUT WITH
                  ROXIMATELY 15% FALLOUT
                 MEDIAN SIZE IN HOPPER FALLOUT—*
                       I
                       I
                    I   II	
                   10    20         100   200 300

                   PARTICLE SIZE, MICRONS
 FIGURE 1  PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF
           FLY ASH IN FILTER CAKE AND
           HOPPER FALLOUT
    300

    200
               SPECIFIC DENSITY OF PARTICLE «0 LB/FT3
               GAS TEMPERATURE 318°F
               CAKE WITH 15* HOPPER FALLOUT ^

                           £*i.L2.uX
20     3D     40

TIME ON STREAM, MINUTES
                                                FIGURE 3  PRESSURE LOSS VERSUS TIME
                                                          DURING ONE CLEANING CYCLE
                                                         10     20     30      40
                                                               TIME ON STREAM. MINUTES
                                                                                  50     60
                                                FIGURE 4  CLOTH RATIO VERSUS TIME
                                                          DURING ONE CLEANING CYCLE
                 1.0           10.0  20
                 PARTICLE DIAMETER. MICRONS
FIGURE 2  VARIATION OF k'2 WITH PARTICLE
          SIZE
                                                  CLEANING
                                               FIGURE 5  BAG BEHAVIOR AT THIMBLE
                                                         WITH INADEQUATE TENSION
                                           146

-------
                 ON LINE
                                                     CLEANING
FIGURE 6 PARTICULATE RE-HANDLING
                                    ENDNOTES
 1.
 2.
 3.
Robinson,  J.W.,  R.E. Harrington,  and P.W. Spaite, A New Method of
Analysis for Multicompartmented  Fabric Filtration.  Atraos.  Environment
      1, 495 (1967).
Noll, K.E., W.T. Davis, and S.P. Shelton, New Criteria for  the Selection
of Fabric  Filters  for Industrial Application.   (Paper 73-301 presented
at A.P.C.A. Annual Meeting 1973).
Jensen, R.M., Baghouse Bid Evaluation.
Fabric Alternatives Forum, 1977).
                                              (Presented at 2nd International
                                      147

-------
             REVIEW OF OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE EXPERIENCES WITH
             HIGH TEMPERATURE FILTER MEDIA  ON  COAL-FIRED BOILERS

                                      By
                             L.  K.  Crippen,  Ph.D.
                           Marketing Representative
                  E.  I.  du Pont  de  Nemours and Company, Inc.
                          Textile Fibers  Department
                             Centre Road Building
                         Wilmington, Delaware   19898

                                   ABSTRACT
       Experiences  on full-scale  coal-fired  industrial boiler  applications
 using high  velocity outside  collectors  fitted with Teflon® TFE-fluorocarbon
 fiber felts is reviewed.  Key operating and maintenance  concerns which can
 influence   bag  life  and  performance   at  high  operating  temperatures  is
 summarized.
                                 INTRODUCTION

       Today,  I  will narrow my  presentation  to  cover  some of our experiences
 with  particulate  control  on  coal-fired  boilers  which  use  high  velocity
 outside  collectors  with high  temperature  filter  media.   I  will  use  a
 number of case  studies  to  give  a brief description  of  a variety of  our
 actual operating and  maintenance experiences.   In addition, key  operating
 and maintenance concerns as well  as  factors which  can influence  bag  life
 and performance  are summarized.

 Fisher Body's Side Stream Separator

       Fisher  Body, a  division  of  General  Motors Corporation,  employs  a
 Western  Precipitation  pulse-jet baghouse to collect  the fly ash  exhausted
 from  the hopper  of a  multicyclone which  acts  as  the  primary  collector
 (1).   Western Precipitation originally  used a  multicyclone instead  of  a
 baghouse  behind  the  initial  multicyclone.  Optimization of  the  primary
 multicyclone led  to collection efficiencies in the range of 9U$ -  96%,  and
 outlet  particulate  concentrations in  the  range  of  0.30  - 0.35  Ib/MM  Btu
 with  no hopper  exhaust gas  flow.  When  15%  -  20%  of the flue gas  was
 exhausted  through  the   hopper to  the baghouse,  the  stack  emission  was
 reduced 50% resulting in emissions of 0.12  - 0.16  Ib/MM Btu.

       This  improvement   far  exceeded  what   one  would  expect  from  simply
 filtering 15$  - 20% of  the  flue gas.  That would reduce the  emission  to
 0.255  - 0.298 Ib/MM Btu, so  the hopper exhaust apparently  does improve  the
 flow pattern in the primary cyclone and increase  its efficiency.

      Fisher Body  has  installed eleven of  these  systems in their  retrofit
program on spreader-stoker boilers.   Ten of the  operating units have  bags
of felted Teflon® fiber and  one had bags  of glass  felt.   The  Fisher  Body

                                     148

-------
a
design project engineers reported typical A P  for  Teflon®
fiber felt  from U-S..  and glass  felt at 5-7".   The first
was  installed  at  the Hamilton,  Ohio plant  of  Fisher  Body in  September
1978, on  a 52 000  Ib/hr boiler.   None  of these  installations  have had
single  Teflon® bag  failure.   However,  the  glass  felt  has just  recently
failed presumably  due to the frequent dew  point  excursions associated  with
their week-end energy saving shut downs.

Du Pont Plant Update

      The  Du Pont  Company  operates a  plant  in West  Virginia  where  the
spreader-stoker  boilers  are equipped  with a  combination  of  multicyclone
collectors  and  baghouses.   Boilers 2, 4,  5,  and 6  have  single  stage
mechanicals  preceding the  baghouse.   This   installation  was  the  first
coal-fired  powerhouse equipped  with   pulse-jet  baghouses  with  bags  of
Teflon® felt,  and  several papers (2, 3,  4,  5)  have been  written about the
design  and  early performance  of the equipment.   Today,  I  will  present  an
update on this operation.

Operating Temperature

      The  baghouses   run  in   a  temperature   range of  330°F  (166°C)  to
400°F   (20iJ°C).    Below   300°F  (1U9°C)  there   is  danger  of   sulfuric
acid corrosion to  the baghouse.  The coal  contains  about  2.6%  sulfur which
does not damage the bags,  but it does corrode the baghouse casing.

Bag Replacement

      The baghouses have been  in operation nearly  six years now,  and  many
of the  original bags  are  still in service.  Table  I  shows the  annual bag
replacement  since  start-up.   So, at the end of 1980, after five  years, 63$
of the  bags have  been replaced, approximately 59% due to  wear.   However,
after the  first  three years, no  bag  failures had occurred  due to  wear;  in
the fourth year, only 1% were replaced  due to wear.

      The failure  rate is plotted in Figure  1  (see  back).   The  dashed  line
shows the annual failures from Table I  and  the solid  line shows  cumulative
failures,  with linear  extrapolation past  1980.   This  line intersects the
"complete  set" ordinate  at  about  March of  1982,  so  we  predict  complete
failure of the original set  of bags at  that  time.   The  annual  failure  rate
follows a  bell-shaped  curve,  in whioh  the average bag  has a life  of 5.3
years, and the oldest bag is expected to fail after 6.5 years.

      The   bags   are   replaced   when   the   stack   opacity   increases.
Transmissometers located in the  baghouse exit breeching  tell  the  operator
that  fly  ash  is  escaping.   The  operator then  switches  compartments off
line until he  finds the compartment which when valved  out,  makes the stack
clear up.   That  is the  compartment with the  leaking  bags.  The boiler is
shut  down  and  a  fluorescent   powder  is  fed  into  the  baghouse  inlet
breeching  (6).   This  powder,  Visolite,  is  sensitive  to  black  light which
makes it  fluoresce.   The  compartment is  again  valved  out of  service and
tagged,   locked,   cleared,   and  tried.   Then  the operator   enters   the

                                      149

-------
penthouse, opens  the  access doors, turns  off the lights  in  the penthouse,
and  scans the  Venturis  with black  ultraviolet  light.   The  Venturis that
fluoresce are marked  for bag replacement.

      The maintenance crew removes  the marked bags,  vacuums  and  inspects
them.   A bag which  has  only one hole, perhaps  because  of  a  broken cage
wire, or possibly a stitching failure in the bottom disk,  is  sent  off to a
repair  shop.   Bags which  show  general  wear are discarded.   New  bags are
installed as  needed,  but  so  far the  plant has  not  found it  necessary  to
replace all of  the bags in one  compartment at the same time.

                                   TABLE I
                  DU  PONT  WEST  VIRGINIA PLANT BAG FAILURES
      Year   Failures     Remarks
       1975       99       54 burned in hopper  fire,  45  bottoms ripped out.
       1976       39       17 burned by weld  spatter,  22 bottoms ripped out.
       1977       25       2 came undamped,  23  bottoms  ripped out.
       1978       40       Wear
       1979     1069       Wear
       1980     1252       Wear

End 1980 total replaced = 2,524
Complete Set of Bags = 4,018

Tennessee Plant

       Du Pont operates  a  plant in Tennessee,  which  has four  145,000  Ib/hr
boilers burning 3% sulfur coal.  Boilers 1 and 2 are spreader-stokers,  and
3  and 4  are chain-grate  stokers.   Boilers  1  and 4 are  equipped  with
2-stage  multicyclones,  and  boilers  2   and  3  have  pulse-jet baghouses
similar to boiler 5 at  the West  Virginia plant.  Bag life has  been  similar
to that at the West Virginia plant.

Staclean™ Diffusers

       A. S. Johnson, Jr.,  Partner of Carolina Stalite Company of Salisbury,
North  Carolina visited the Tennessee  Plant  in December,  1978  and  learned
that   the  Teflon®  TFE-fluorocarbon   fiber   bags  operated   successfully.
However, he  noticed  some wear  had occured  on the  inside of  some of  the
bags after three  years.   The wear was fairly uniformly distributed around
the inner surface of the bag  and limited to the  top  three or four  feet of
the bag and was attributed to fly ash erosion.

       A. S. Johnson thought about  the wear  and invented a solution to it.
He sketched  a perforated tube which  could  be  placed  inside  the cage,  to
shield the bag from  the erosion flow  of fly ash  (7).   His  idea developed
into a product known  as a Staclean™  diffuser which has  been  patented in
the U.S. and has foreign patents pending.  The manufacturer  claims  that in
addition to  reducing  wear,  use  of the  diffusers results  in improved  bag

                                     150

-------
cleaning and reduced pressure drops.

      In the summer  of 1980,  the  Tennessee plant installed a  complete  set
of  Staclean1^  diffusers  in  the  two  baghouses serving  Boiler  3    The
baghouse pressure drop  was  reduced from 10" water to the range of  5"  to 6"
water, and that level has been maintained for several months.

Calculated Savings

      It is  a  bit early  to  say  how  much  bag  life  has been extended,  but
after  discussion with  plant  personnel, the  following calculated  savings
justify  the  installation  of  Staclean™  diffusers  on Boiler  5  at  the
Du Pont plant in West Virginia (Table II).

      Cost for  the  1,176 Staclean™  diffusers is $35  each,  plus  $25  each
for  transportation  and  installation;  $60 per  diffuser  for  a  total  of
$71,000.   Investor's  method  return  for  the  installation  is  59$.    The
entire calculations  are too lengthy to present  here.

      The  West  Virginia  Plant has  purchased diffusers  for  the #5 boiler
baghouses,  and  performance  data  are  expected  shortly.   The  Staclean™
diffusers  will  be  installed  in   dirty  bags to  give  a  direct measure  of
pressure drop savings attributable to the diffusers.

                                   TABLE II
                   CALCULATED  COST SAVINGS  WITH DIFFUSERS*

                        Horsepower            $15,000/yr
                        Compressed Air          8,000/yr
                        Bag  Replacement         9,000/yr
                        Bag  Washing             3.000Vyr
                     TOTAL  SAVINGS           $35,000/yr

* Tennessee  Plant

ETS Monitored Baghouse

      An Enviro-Systems baghouse  on  a stoker-boiler has been  monitored  by
ETS,  Inc.  through  a contract from  the  Environmental Protection  Agency.
Six  hundred  and  forty-eight  bags of Teflon®  TFE-fluorocarbon fiber  have
been in service  for  a total of three and one half  years.  After 27 months
at the first site,  a fire occured in the main plant;  however,  the boiler,
baghouse,  and bags  were not  damaged.   The  boiler  and baghouse were  moved
to a  new  site.   The  Teflon®  bags were boxed and shipped  to  the  new  site
where they were reinstalled and have been  in service  now for  an additional
15 months.

      The  Enviro-System's   baghouse   at  the  original  installation   used
reverse air  flow for cleaning.   However, pulse  assist  using  approximately
90  psi  was  added.   The  baghouse  currently   operates  between  400°F  -
450°F  (20U°C  -  232°C)   (Table  III).    The  operating   and   maintenance
procedures used  at this  site have been well developed  over  the  years  to

                                      151

-------
react to a variety of potential problems (8).

      The baghouse  operates 5 to  5-1/2 days a  week and  has gone  through
many shut-downs  and total  cold  re-starts.   Eventually,  off-line  cleaning
is  used to  remove  the  cake which  built  up during  cycling  through  dew
point.   Nodules  also  developed  and  became  attached  to  the bags  at  the
original site.   Eventually, the  bags would  have to  be  cleaned  in  place
using a  combination of vacuum suctioning and scraping.  This procedure  has
not been necessary since the addition of pulse assisted cleaning.

      Despite  the  severe  chemical  and  physical  environment,   the  bag
failure  rate  was  approximately  5%/yr  for  the  first  27  months  and
approximately 5.7%/yr for the last 15 months.

                                  TABLE III
                            FLUE GAS PARAMETERS*
      Type
1st Site

30,000-34,000

300°F
                                                        2nd Site
                                                        35,000-38,000
5 - 5-1/2 days/wk
                                                              - 450°F
                                                               - 232°C)
                                                        0.2 - 0.5 typical

                                                        5.7*/yr

                                                        5 - 5-1/2 days/wk
      Gas Flow (ACFM):

      Gas Temperature:


      Inlet Loading: (gr/DSCF)     0.5 typical

      Bag Failures:

      Operating Cycle:

* ETS monitored baghouse.

Routine Operating and Maintenance Considerations

      We  have  learned  a lot  from our  field experiences  in  relation  to
routine operating  and maintenance procedures  and bag use.   Much has  been
written about  general operating  and  maintenance practices  and  procedures
(6, 9,  10).   However, we  are all still  learning about the  use of  filter
media in  this  application.   I would like to  summarize some general  points
which I have found to be key from ray field experiences.

Get to know your entire system.

      System variables  you need  to  become  very  familiar  with include  the
design  and  operation  of   the  boiler   including  start-up   and shut-down
procedures;  baghouse design  including  the  cleaning  mechanism,  fly  ash
storage and removal; monitoring  instrumentation;  filter media; the type  of
coal,  fly ash characteristics, and gas stream chemistry.

Experiment with the operation of the system.
                                    152

-------
                                to  *»*»>*  a good  »omng  relationship

Keep excellent records.

Record keeping can  offer valuable  assistance  in solving the simple to  the
complex problems.   Keep accurate  records  of bag replacement and a  diagram
showing replacement  patterns for your entire baghouse.  This record should
include  the  date  of the  bag  change,   the  type  of  bag  installed,   the
location,  detailed  description  of the failure, and  an evaluation of what
contributed to the  bag  failure.

Develop a  step-by-step  problem solving approach.

      Develop  a  step-by-step  problem solving  plan based  on  operation of
your  system.   The  plan should  be practiced  and  modified when  necessary.
Quick action  is  often necessary when  a  problem is encountered;  hence,  the
need for a plan.

Obtain assistance when  needed.

      Unusual  operating  conditions  should   be   noted   immediately   and
determination  made  as to possible causes.  Be  sure  to examine  the entire
system.  Get  people involved who  understand all segments  of the operation
including  the various  types of  filter  media.  However,  you  should start
with your  original  equipment manufacturer.

Filter Media Considerations

      From our field  experience,  I have  compiled a  checklist (Table  IV).

                                   TABLE  IV
                            FILTER  MEDIA  CHECKLIST

      Concern                    Check       	
      Bag Installation           Recheck bag seating/reduce  bag  change outs
      Bag Construction           Reinspect bags before installation
      Chemical Degradation       Choose chemical resistant media and  thread
      Mechanical Failure         Periodic bag evaluation to  predict bag life
      Bag Cleaning               Experiment with cleaning mode and timing;
                                 check pulse action;  evaluate air flow
      Bag Sizing/Fit             Follow recommendation for specific filter
                                 media;   Teflon®   TFE-fluorocarbon   fiber
                                 oversized to recommendation
      Cake Release               Try off-line cleaning;  refurbish bags, e.g.
                                 vacuum/wash
      Embers in Baghouses        Cyclones before baghouse/pull ash

Bag Sizing

      Our experiences in  the  field  and laboratory  indicate  the  need  for

                                    153

-------
correct bag  sizing with  Teflon® TFE-fluorocarbon  fiber  bags.   Your  felt
supplier,   either  Du   Pont   Fabric  and  Finishes  Department   or   Albany
International,  should  recommend   the   percent  of  oversizing  for  your
specific  operating conditions  based  on their  expected  shrinkage  at  your
operating temperature.  This  oversizing allows  the bag to inflate properly
when pulsed thus allowing the cake to  blow  off.   Teflon® fiber  bags which
are  sized too small  may  eventually  shrink tight  on  the cages  which  can
lead to poor bag cleaning.

      Due to the pliable  nature of this felt,  problems with flex failures
have not  been observed.   Stiff  fabrics  when oversized can wrinkle and  fail
due to flexure; hence,  their  sizing requirements  differ.  Due to the range
of performance for fibers and filter  media,  you should use  recommendations
for your  specific  filter media.

      Washing a  correctly sized bag  should present no  problems when  done
properly.   This  can  be a big advantage to  your  operating and maintenance
cost since a process upset or problem does  not  mean that you have to throw
all  the   bags  away.   The  bags  should  be  sent  to a  cleaner who  has  had
previous  experience  in refurbishing bags.   It  is  also  possible to  repair
bags where  small  holes have  occurred.  In  many  cases,  the organization
refurbishing your  bags will determine whether the bag is worth repairing.

Bag Life

      Bag life varies to a large extent depending on: dust characteristics,
operating conditions,  operating history  (temperature surges,  weld   holes,
embers),  maintenance, and filter media characteristics.
                                   SUMMARY

      There  is  considerable interest in  the use  of filter media  on high
velocity outside collectors  for coal-fired boilers.   From our involvement
in  particulate  control   using  fabric  filters,   we   have  learned  the
importance  of  good  operating  and  maintenance  procedures  as  well  as the
need  for  systematic problem solving  techniques.    Bags  of Teflon®  fiber
have  demonstrated  good performance  and long life which  can  often  reduce
operating and maintenance  expenditures.  Proper selection  and  use  of bags
can contribute to good operation.
                                    154

-------
                                 REFERENCES

 1. Anon.,  "The Side Stream Separator", General Motors Corp. (1980).
 2. Lucas,  R.  L.,   "Gas-Solids  Separations:  State of  the Art",  Chemical
   Engineering Progress, 70, 52 (December 1974).
 3. Barrosse,  B. A.,  "Baghouses on  Stoker-Fired  Boilers", American  Power
   Conference Proceedings, 37,  720 (1974).
 4. McKee,  D.  E.,  et  al,  "A  Review  of  Pulse  Jet Baghouses  and  Dual
   Mechanical Collector  Performance  on  Spreader Stoker-Fired  Boilers",
   Paper   No.  77-26.4,   1977   Air  Pollution  Control  Association  Annual
   Meeting,  Toronto.
 5. Smith,  J.  E., "Case  History of Bag Filter Operation  on Spreader  Stoker
   Boilers",  ASME Industrial Power Conference,  Cleveland,  OH,  Oct.  23-26,
   1977.
 6. Bundy,  R.  P.,  "Operation &  Maintenance of Fabric Filters",  Journal  of
   The Air Pollution Control Association, 30, 754, (July 1980).
 7. Lucas,   et  al.,  "The  Staclean™  Diffuser  Increases  Capacity  and
   Reduces Bag Wear  in Pulse-Jet Baghouses", Paper  No.  80-30.4,  1980 Air
   Pollution Control Association Annual Meeting, Montreal.
 8. ETS,  Inc., "Fabric Filter Seminar Handbook".
 9. Romanski,   J.   E.,   "Reducing  Opacity  by  Optimizing  Maintenance  and
   Operating   Procedures",  Journal   of   the   Air  Pollution   Control
   Association,  30, 748,  (July 1980).
10. Rullman,  D. H.,  "Baghouse Technology:  A Perspective", Journal  of the
   Air Pollution Control  Association, 26, 16, (January 1976).
                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 1.  G. A.  Faber  and J.  P.  Pagan,  E.  I. du  Pont de Nemours  and  Company,
    Inc., Fabrics & Finishes Department.
 2.  T. T. Gniewek and  R.  H.  Me Coy, E.  I. du Pont  de  Nemours  and  Company,
    Inc., Chemical 4 Pigments Department.
 3.  G. P. Greiner, ETS, Inc.
 4.  A. S. Johnson, Jr., Staclean™  Diffuser Company.
 5.  R. L. Lucas,  E.  I. du Pont  de Nemours and  Company,  Inc., Engineering
    Department.
 6.  J. N. Shah, E. I.  du  Pont  de Nemours and Company,  Inc., Textile Fibers
    Department.
 7.  R. J. Tessier, General Motors Corporation, Fisher Body Division.
                                     155

-------
CD
O
a
c.
CD
cn
O)
03
CD
"o
"c
a
6








«^uu
3600


3000
2400


1800
1200

600
f— *+\J I O *** ' ' V >»X Vr/ 1 1 1 J-/I W * V. W \— t i«l 1 k^ <-l "y*1
- 1
— 1
_ /
: /
— . ^
/
/
Cumulative /
: /
' *-+
L'" %\ Annual Failure
I // \ of Original
/' \ Set of Bags
// i
'- — — •>/ \
0
1 ! ^ 	 1 1*1 VI!
i i
74 76 78 '80 '82 '84
Year Average Bag Has
— Life 5.3 Years — -
After 6.5 Years Expect



          Figure 1
   Bag Repiacement at
Du Pont West Virginia Plant
            156

-------
                     PILOT DEMONSTRATION OF THE PRECHARGER-
                                COLLECTOR SYSTEM

                     By:   P.  Vann Bush and Duane H. Pontius
                          Southern Research Institute
                          Birmingham, AL 35255
                                    ABSTRACT

     Results from  the  evaluation of a 1000 ACFM pilot scale precharger-collec-
 tor system in  September,  1979 justified the development of  a larger scale two-
 stage precipitator system.   A pilot demonstration system with a  30,000 ACFM gas
 volume capacity was designed and fabricated, and it was installed at TVA's Bull
 Run Steam Plant.   There is  sufficient flexibility in the system  to enable a tho-
 rough demonstration of the  technology.

     Continuous monitors  interface to a computer data acquisition system to
 provide real-time  mass efficiency, outlet particle size distribution, SOa con-
 centration, and precipitator voltages and currents.  These  measurements will be
 supplemented with  standard  stack sampling techniques for selected precipitator
 conditions.  Startup information and preliminary data as available at the time
 of the Symposium will  be  presented.
                                  INTRODUCTION

     Southern Research  Institute (SoRI)  has  a contract with  the EPA Industrial
Environmental Research  Laboratory (EPA/IERL)  to demonstrate  on a large pilot
scale the precharger-collector  system for high resistivity ash collection.  The
technical and economic  feasibility of this two-stage  design  was confirmed by a
small pilot scale  system  evaluation.   SoRI contracted Lodge-Cottrell Division
of Dresser Industries to  design a two-stage  electrostatic precipitator (ESP)
system with a 30,000 ACFM gas volume  capacity based upon the design of the
small pilot scale  system.   Lodge-Cottrell was also  contracted to fabricate and
erect the pilot demonstration ESP.

     The evaluation of  the system performance will  include a computerized con-
tinuous monitoring network.  Component instruments  in this automated data acqui-
sition system are mass  concentration  monitors,  particle size analyzer, S02 con-
centration monitor, total  power consumption monitor,  thermocouples, and voltage
and current transducers.   These instruments will be used to  determine the opti-
mum operating condition for the ESP.   Once stable operation  in this mode is
achieved, supplemental  measurements and  analyses of the ESP  system performance
will be made using conventional stack sampling techniques.
                                      157

-------
                                    DESIGN

     The design of the pilot demonstration ESP was based upon  the  electrode
design used in small pilot scale tests and standard ESP design practices.   The
precharger stage of the ESP is a three-electrode configuration patented  by
Pontius and Smith of SoRI.  The arrangement of the three electrodes  is shown
schematically in Figure 1.  Due to the proximity of the screen electrode to the
grounded plate electrode and the necessity for separate high voltage sources
for the screen and corona discharge electrodes, the design developed for the
large pilot scale precharger had to incorporate techniques for fabricating  and
erecting the component parts within tolerances more restrictive than typical in
ESP design.

     The precharger stage has an active plate length in the direction of gas
flow of 0.22m.  The electrodes have an active height of 3.12m.  There are eight-
een gas passages in the precharger, with a plate-to-plate spacing of  0.18m, giv-
ing a total plate area of 24.7m .  A 50 kV, 50 mA power supply is used on the
corona discharge electrodes which allows a maximum current density of 200 nA/cm2.
The screen electrodes are powered with a 20kV, 500 mA supply.

     The collector stage of the pilot demonstration ESP was designed  to  allow
flexibility in the type of discharge electrode used.  Otherwise, the  collector
stage consists of four standard Lodge-Cottrell design electrical fields  of
2.74m, 1.83m, 1.83m, and 2.74m lengths.  There are three rapping fields, with
fields two and three sharing 3.66m long collection plates.  The plate height in
all fields is 3.12m.  There are thirteen gas passages in the collector stage,
with a plate-to-plate spacing of 0.25m, giving a total collection plate  area of
742.8m2.  Each electrical field is energized with a transformer-rectifier set
having a capacity of 55 kV and 200 mA.

     The discharge electrode designs selected for study in the  collector stage
are 2.5 cm mesh x 0.32 cm diameter wire mounted on standard Lodge-Cottrell masts
and 0.95 cm diameter rods spaced 9.2 cm apart on standard Lodge-Cottrell masts.
These special configurations were selected for their abilities  to produce a low,
stable current at a high voltage, which is a desirable feature for the collector
stage of a two-stage ESP.

     A flow model study was conducted by Lodge-Cottrell to assist in  the design
of flow distribution splitters for the inlet nozzle to the ESP, baffles  between
sections, and the flow straighteners in the inlet and outlet.   The flow  model
was built at one-half scale which allowed greater precision in developing design
parameters than typical of full-scale units which are modeled  at one-sixteenth
or one-eighth scale.

     The internal arrangement of the precharger-collector system is  shown in the
schematic sectional side view in Figure 2.

                                 INSTALLATION

     The pilot demonstration ESP system was installed at the TVA Bull Run Steam
Plant.   This plant was chosen because the coal source used provides  a consistent
grade low-sulfur coal which produces a high resistivity ash (SxlO1 ^hm-cm at
                                      158

-------
130 C)   Combustion exhaust  gases are extracted immediately downstream of the
air preheater, pulled  through  the pilot scale system,  and reentered  into the
plant duct.  A schematic  illustration of the pilot demonstration  site arrange-
ment is given in Figure 3.                                             ncmgt;

     The collector-stage  electrodes  were installed in  the ESP  casing and then
aligned.  The 0.95 cm  diameter rod discharge electrode masts were installed
in the four collector  fields.   Standard Lodge-Cottrell design  cam-type drop
rods are used for electrode  rapping  in the collector sections.

     The precharger electrodes were  assembled on temporary scaffolding outside
the ESP casing.  This  made it  easier to properly align the three-electrode ar-
rangement.  The assembled precharger was set into the  ESP casing  and final
alignment of the electrodes  was performed.  The electrode spacing tolerances
were not difficult to  attain due to  the careful fabrication and treatment of
the electrodes.  Electric vibrators  are used to provide ash removal from the
precharger electrodes.

     The Laboratory/Control  Building for the pilot demonstration  ESP is repre-
sented in Figure 3.  The  control panels for the transformer-rectifier sets,
the power supply controls for  the precharger stage,  precharger vibrator control
panel, rapper controls, hopper controls, and power distribution panels are
located in the building.  Also, the  minicomputer used  for the precharger-col-
lector system evaluation  is  in the laboratory.

                                  EVALUATION

     A computerized data  acquisition system is  used to monitor long-term oper-
ating stability and the effects of changes in the system operating values.
The secondary voltage  and current values from each of  the transformer-rectifier
sets and from the precharger power supplies are monitored.   A wattmeter is
used to log total power consumption.  A P-5A Particulate Monitor  made by
Environmental Systems  Corporation is installed  in the  ESP inlet ductwork to
measure the inlet mass loading.  Another P-5A Particulate Monitor is located
in the outlet ductwork to measure the outlet mass loading.   Thermocouples are
used to monitor inlet  and outlet flue gas temperatures.   A Lear Siegler SOa
monitor measures the S02  concentration in the flue gas;  which, together with
the temperature, can be used to detect a possible change in the ash resisti-
vity.  A Fine Particle Stack Spectrometer System (FPSSS)  by Particle Measuring
Systems is installed in the  outlet ductwork to  monitor the particle size dis-
tribution.

     These continuous monitors are interfaced to a POP 11/23 minicomputer.   A
block diagram of the data acquisition system is shown  in Figure 4.  A data
handling program has been developed  which acquires data from the  monitors,
checks the integrity of the  data,  stores the acquired  data on diskettes, com-
putes mass efficiency  from the two P-5A monitors,  displays selected data, and
plots the data if desired.   The frequency and number of data samples are sel-
ectable.  The computer monitor continuously displays an updated summary of the
data record.
                                     159

-------
                             STARTUP INFORMATION

     The startup of the precharger-collector system consisted of primarily six
phases: collector stage rapping check, precharger vibrator sequencer program-
ming, transformer-rectifier checkout, precharger power supply checkout, hopper
heater/ash disposal system check, and monitor data acquisition check.  There
were no difficulties in energizing and operating the collector stage rapping
and transformer-rectifier sets.  The precharger vibrators were programmed and
activated.  The hopper heaters were turned on and the thermostatic controls
set.  The ash disposal system which was integrated into the plant system was
modified to improve the operation.

     As expected in a prototype system, the precharger startup was not as
straightforward as the collector stage startup.  One of the precharger power
supplies was incorrectly wired.  This has since been corrected.  The collector
stages and the data acquisition system have been operated.  We have not been
operating long enough to present any data at this time.

     We plan to operate the system continuously for several weeks before a
complete characterization of performance is made, since long-term operating
experience and an assessment of reliability are essential components of the
ultimate evaluation of the system.

                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The authors wish to express their gratitude to Morey Nunn of Lodge-
Cottrell for his technical management of the design, fabrication, and erection
of the pilot demonstration ESP.

     We appreciate the work of William Steele and Bobby Pyle of SoRI in the
development of the data acquisition programs.
                                    160

-------
               PRECHARGER ELECTRODE CONFIGURATION
     TUBULAR
     SUPPORT
GAS
FLOW
                          CORONA
                          DISCHARGE
                          ELECTRODE
                                                     SCREEN
                                                     ELECTRODES
                                   GROUNDED
                                   PLATE ELECTRODES
TO DOWNSTREAM
COLLECTOR
                                                                  4100-11
                   Figure 1. Precharger electrode configuration.
                                161

-------
                                     TWO-STAGE ESP INTERNAL ARRANGEMENT
                                 FIELD NO. 1
                                                            FIELDS 2 &3
                                                                                       FIELD NO. 4
              PRECHARGER
              FIELD
GAS FLOW
          DISCHARGE RAPPING
          ARRANGEMENT
                                                        COLLECTOR GUIDES
                                                        & BAFFLES
BOTTOM
DISCHARGE
FRAME
                                                                                                      — COLLECTOR
                                                                                                         ASSEMBLY
                                                                                                             620-249
                                       Figure 2. Two-stage ESP internal arrangement.

-------
                          PILOT DEMONSTRATION ESP FACILITY
                              AIR PREHEATER
                              EXHAUST DUCT
PILOT DEMONSTRATION
ESP
                        ESP LABORATORY-CONTROL ROOM
                                                                         620-250
                          Figure 3. Pilot demonstration ESP facility.
                                       163

-------
                               DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM
                                                                                      COMPUTER
P-5A MONITORS,
VOLTAGE & CURRENT
TRANSDUCERS (12),
POWER MONITOR,
SO2 MONITOR
DIFF. VOLT
AMP & I/V CONV.
                                        SCANNING
                                        THERMOMETER
                                                         COMMAND/STATUS  ^
                                                             DATA
                                            FPSSS
                                                                       A

16 CHANNEL
A/D MUX
                                      16 BIT
                                      PARALLEL
                                      I/O
                                      INTERFACE
                                                                                         J
                                      SERIAL
                                      INTERFACE
                                      (RS 232)
                                                                                                     4100-101
                         Figure 4. Block diagram of the data acquisition system.

-------
               REMEDIAL TREATMENTS FOR DETERIORATED HOT SIDE
                         PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE

             By:  Roy E. Bickelhaupt
                  Southern Research Institute
                  Birmingham, Alabama 35255
                                  ABSTRACT
     Laboratory experiments with parallel plate resistivity cells were
conducted to provide chemical evidence in support of the sodium depletion
phenomenon as the cause of time dependent deterioration of hot side precipi-
tator performance.  Using a wire/plate corona discharge device with hand-
placed untreated and sodium conditioned ash, the effect of commercial sodium
conditioning was successfully recreated in the laboratory.  Chemical analyses
and current density/time relationships suggest that the conditioning effect
occurs because sodium from the conditioned ash diffuses chemically toward the
collection plate into the zone depleted of sodium.  Apparently an equilibrium
is established between  sodium chemically  diffusing  toward  the plate and
sodium migrating away from the plate  under the influence of the  electric
field   Collection  plate doping was  found to be  a potential remedial  treat-
ment.  This technique involves placing a  substance  having  a high concentration
of charge-carrying  ions on the steel  plate to  relieve  the  blocking effect of
the  collection Electrode.  A thin layer of high  sodium, borosilicate glass
sJmulatinTa  porcelain  enameled  plate and a  film of sodium carbonate  dried
from an  aqueous  solution worked  well.


                                 INTRODUCTION
      One of the techniques used to combat «
 ash is to install the electrostatic precipitator on the hot side ot
                                  de ".r.turo   50 C  a »os  a     l-
preheater.   At the typical hot side ".r.tur^o
                                        10   ohm cm
 ashes have a resistivity lower than 1 x 10   ohm cm
                                                                       C
 about fly ash compositional variations.

      A large number of hot side P-ipit-tors  have
 several years.  One of the most ^^cult^roble^        OCCUIied  even though
 oration of performance as a function  of  ™*e'         are properiy executed.
 the precipitator design, Construction and Deration a ^  ^^
 As the performance deteriorates,  the  electric  p               corona>  Back
 attenuates, and the current/voltage relationship sugges
                                       165

-------
corona is a manifestation of dielectric breakdown of  the collected  ash layer
due to intense electric fields caused by excessively  high  resistivity.
Inconsistently, in-situ and laboratory resistivity measurements  indicate  that
back corona should not occur.

     In a previous paper(l) an interpretation of the  observed phenomenon  was
given.  It was suggested that a thin layer of fly ash tenaciously adheres to
the surface of the collection plate even though a good rapping schedule is
followed.  After a long time under electric stress, the thin layer  is
depleted of mobile charge carriers, sodium ions.  Current  flow through the
fly ash layer is greatly attenuated, because conduction is then dependent on a
different, less favorable mechanism.  The thin, more-or-less permanent ash
layer develops a high resistivity, and consequently,  the collection plate
surface becomes coated with a very good electric insulator.

     To overcome this problem, the formation of the tenaciously  adherent
layer must be prevented, or a source of charge-carrying ions must be made
available to the sodium depleted zone.  This paper describes the results  of
laboratory experiments conducted to better understand the  phenomenon and  to
evaluate several remedial techniques.

               CHEMICAL EVIDENCE OF THE SODIUM DEPLETED LAYER

     Evidence(2) obtained with chemical transference  experiments to demon-
strate ionic conduction showed an increase in sodium  at the cathode and a
decrease in sodium at the anode.  However, these experiments could not
illustrate the very steep sodium concentration gradient suggested in
reference 1 for the ash contiguous with the electrodes, because
the thickness of the ash layers chemically analyzed were too great.  Attempts
have been made to show the sodium gradient using fly ash removed from com-
mercial precipitator collection plates.  While it is  found that the sodium
concentration in the ash layer decreases as the collection plate surface  is
approached, the very steep gradient cannot be shown.  Several reasons are
suggested to explain this.

     One argument is that the very thin layer depleted of  sodium becomes
intermixed with the oxidation/corrosion product on the collection plate
surface.  It is very difficult to remove successive 50 to  100 micron thick
layers of ash from a collection plate and maintain the cut parallel to the
metal plate.  It is also conceivable that sodium can migrate back toward  the
depleted zone because:  a) the plates remain hot without power to the precip-
itator at the start of a shutdown,  or b) the high ambient relative humidity
during shutdown facilitates reverse migration.   It is believed that operators
have noted improved performance resulting from a short shutdown because of
the above factors.

     To demonstrate the substantial depletion of sodium in an ash layer con-
tiguous with the anode (collection plate), several experimental prerequisites
must be met to overcome the specific points mentioned immediately above.  Two
stainless steel electrodes were fabricated with recesses 0.01 cm and 0.02 cm
deep in the anode and cathode surfaces, respectively.  Large fly ash particles

                                     166

-------
and strong agglomerates of particles  would  present  a problem when  only  the
ash contained in the recess was  to  be removed.   Therefore   the  fly ash  was
passed through a 200 mesh screen before  use.   The minus  200 mesh ash  con-
tained 0.34 percent sodium expressed  as  oxide  in weight  percent.   A 0.4 cm
layer of this ash was placed between  the described  electrodes.

     To make sure that a significant  chemical  change occurred within  the ash
layer in a reasonable time, the  experiment  was conducted at 470°C  (880°F) in
an environment of air containing 1  percent  mositure.   The  ash layer was
maintained under a voltage gradient of 5 kV/cm for  7 days.   Conducting  the
experiment near the upper end  of the  hot side  precipitator temperature  range
produced a high current density  that  caused the depleted zone to develop
quickly.  To transport the same  quantity of electric energy at  about  350°C
would require in excess of 70  days, an undesirable  laboratory situation.

     Current density as a function  of time  of  applied voltage gradient  is
shown in Figure 1.  This curve shape  is  typical for the  current density/time
relationship during which sodium depletion  takes place.  The initial  part of
the curve probably represents  the time during  which a dimensionally stable
layer of sodium depleted ash is  developed.   Later the charge transport
through the depleted zone is dependent on a mechanism other than sodium
migration, and the current density asymptotically approaches an  equilibrium
value for this mechanism.  If  the anode  (collection plate)  were capable of
injecting carrier ions into the  contiguous  fly ash  and the cathode were a
nonblocking electrode, the observed current density attenuation would not
occur.

     The resistivity values shown in  Figure 1  are from calculations made at
the start and termination of the test.  The 2.5 x 10  ohm cm value shown for
the 0.4 cm ash layer at the end  of  the test is the  effective resistivity for
several resistances in series.   The most influential resistance in this
series is the sodium depleted  zone.

     After completing the test,  the ash  layer  was cooled under  electric
stress in dry air.  The ash contained in the recessed faces of  the electrodes
was quickly removed for chemical analysis.   The 0.01 cm  layer of ash  con-
tiguous with the anode contained 0.06% sodium  as oxide in  weight percent,
and the 0.02 cm layer adjacent to the cathode  contained  0.77%.  These data
are plotted as part of a hypothetical sodium concentration profile in
Figure 2.  For lack of data, the exact profile is not known.  However,  based
on other investigations, it seems correct that the  curve should pass  through
the coordinates 0.25% sodium oxide  and 0.25 millimeters  and that the
composition at the centerline  should  be  equal  to the starting composition.
This is the expected profile for an ionic conduction process operating  with
a fixed number of mobile charge  carriers between blocking  electrodes.   In a
precipitator showing performance deterioration, the rapping process dislodges
all of the ash layer except some fraction of a millimeter  nearest  the
collection plate or anode.
                                      167

-------
     Two somewhat crude but interesting calculations can be made using these
data.  Assuming that sodium is the only conducting species with respect to
all the electric energy passed in Figure 1, about 5 x 10~  grams of sodium
per cm2 of electrode area would have migrated out of the ash layer contiguous
with the anode.  Considering the subtle factors such as the ash layer poros-
ity, it was computed that the 0.01 cm thick ash layer contained about
4 x 10~5 grams of sodium per cm2.  This suggests that all of the mobile
sodium in the recessed ash layer migrated.


     Assume that the terminal resistivity of 2.5 x 10   ohm cm was
the resultant for two uniform layers.  One layer has a thickness of 0.01 cm
and an unknown resistivity, while the other layer has a resistivity of
1.3 x 109 ohm cm and thickness of 0.39 cm.  From these data and assumptions,
the resistivity of the thin, sodium depleted zone is calculated as about
1 x 1012 ohm cm.  If this experiment had been conducted for a much longer
time at a conventional hot side temperature of 350°C, the computed resis-
tivity value for the depleted zone would be about 1 x 1013 ohm cm.  In a
precipitator, the situation is additionally aggravated by lower temperatures
prevailing   when the power generating system is not at full load and
especially during the time that the unit is being brought to full load.

                      RESULTS USING REMEDIAL TECHNIQUES

Reversable Polarity

     In reference 1, several remedial techniques were suggested to overcome
the degraded precipitator performance caused by the development of a sodium
depleted layer of ash.  One of the principal experimental techniques used to
define the character of the sodium depletion phenomenon was polarity
reversal.  It was shown that 'a degraded current density/voltage relationship
created with a given polarity could be caused to recover by reversing the
corona polarity.  Subsequently this technique was attempted in the field
using commercial equipment.  The results were negative, and the tests termi-
nated.  In principal the procedure has merit; however, the conventional
precipitator designed for negative corona is incapable of operating under
positive polarity(3).

Sodium Conditioning

     Another remedial technique that has received commercial application is
sodium conditioning.  Apparently some success has been obtained by injecting
dry sodium compounds into the ductwork preceding a hot side precipitator(4).
On the other hand, a totally negative result was obtained when this technique
was tried with a cold side precipitator(S).

     During the past year, sodium conditioning by the addition of a sodium
compound to the coal feed has been investigated, and an interim report has
been published(6).  It was found that the sodium compound decomposed and/or
volatilized in the furnace and the vapor condensed on the fly ash surface
becoming an integral part of the ash.  When this conditioned ash was

                                     168

-------
precipitated on top of the  thin,  sodium depleted ash layer  adhering  to the
collection plates, an interesting result occurred.   The  effect  is  shown in
Figure 3 where total power  to  the precipitator and  the particulate emission
rate are illustrated as a function of time.

     Precipitator washing is a common technique to  obtain relief from the
sodium depletion problem for a short time,  perhaps  up to 60 days.  Although
the washing operating does  not necessarily  remove the fly ash that is
tenaciously adherent to the oxidized surface of the mild steel  collection
plate, the procedure apparently promotes the movement of sodium ions back
toward the collection plate.   The water, penetrating the adherent  layer,
carries sodium in solution  or  increases the surface diffusion of the sodium
toward the plate.  It is believed that this is what occurs  when a  precipita-
tor is shut down and exposed to ambient conditions.  The shutdown  usually
results in improved performance for a very  short time.

     In Figure 3 it is shown that 50 days after washing, the precipitator
power had decreased an order of magnitude and the emission  rate approached
0.3 lbs/106 BTU.  At that point,  sodium conditioning was started,  and within
a  few days, the power to the precipitator had increased  about 5 times and the
emission rate was less than 0.05 lbs/106 BTU.  This significant recovery
occurred even though the collection plate surfaces  were  covered with a thin
layer of sodium depleted ash.   It would seem improbable  that sodium-rich,
conditioned ash could penetrate the interstices of  the sodium depleted layer
to provide a source of sodium  at the plate.  Therefore,  it  was  assumed that
sodium from the conditioned ash chemically  diffused toward  the  collection
plate.

     After some period of time with a given level of sodium conditioning, the
performance characteristics are apparently  controlled by an equilibrium estab-
lished between two competing processes.  On the one hand, sodium ions serving
as charge carriers are motivated away from  the collection plate under the
influence of the electric field created in  the ash layer.  On the  other hand,
sodium ions from the surface of the sodium-rich, conditioned ash migrate  to-
ward  the  collection  plate  under the influence of the negative  gradient  of the
chemical potential,  i.e., the  difference in sodium concentration between  the
conditioned ash and  the  sodium depleted ash.  The chemical  diffusion idea is
especially plausible since  the increased sodium concentration for  the condi-
tioned ash is associated with  the ash surface thereby offering  potentially
high diffusivity coefficients.

     A laboratory experiment was conducted  to:  a)  determine whether the  data
shown in Figure 3 could be  reproduced in the laboratory  and b)  determine
whether the chemical diffusion of sodium into the depleted  zone could be
detected.  A previously  described wire/plate corona discharge device (7)  that
utilizes a 0.5 cm layer  of  hand-placed ash was used.  An  ash containing  0.32%
sodium by weight as oxide was  placed on the plate and a  negative  11  kV
voltage was applied.  After 264 hours, the  current density/time relationship
shown in Figure 4 as Phase  1 was established.  At this point,  the  ash layer
was cooled in the dry air environment, removed from the  test chamber, and
while still hot to the touch,  the plate was placed on edge  and  gently tapped.


                                      169

-------
About 0.5 mm of ash adhered to the "collection plate".  This was quickly
overlayed with conditioned ash containing 1.8% sodium by weight as oxide and
returned to the test apparatus.  The assembly was quickly heated to  345°C in
dry air, and the negative 11 kV voltage was reapplied.  That portion of
Figure 4 labeled Phase 2 was then generated.

     It is obvious that the combination of Phase 1 and Phase 2 in Figure 4
produces the same curve shape as that for precipitator power versus  time in
Figure 3.  In Figure 4, the solid symbols represent the actual data  taken.
It is believed that the offset in the data was due to experimental problems
related to starting and stopping the experiment and removing and replacing
ash by hand.  The dashed curve simply shows the data as if the offset had not
occurred.

     In a companion experiment, the 0.5 mm layer of ash adhering to the
"collection plate" at the end of Phase 1 was removed for chemical analysis
rather than overlayed with conditioned ash.  This adherent layer had a sodium
content of 0.29% by weight as oxide in contrast to the 0.32% determined for
this ash prior to the test.  Chemical analysis of the 0.5 mm layer of ash
contiguous to the "collection plate" at the end of the experiment involving
the overlay of conditioned ash (Phase 2) revealed a sodium concentration of
0.39%.  A very significant difference in percent of combustibles between the
original ash and the overlayed, sodium conditioned ash gave evidence that it
was unlikely that mechanical mixing of the two ash layers provided the
chemical change determined for sodium concentration.

     The described experiment illustrated three important points.   First,
overlaying a sodium depleted ash layer with a second layer of ash that had
received a surface enrichment of sodium by conditioning caused current density
to increase even though a voltage was continuously applied.  Second, the cur-
rent density increased at a decreasing rate for three days as it approached a
limit value.  Third, chemical analyses suggest the sodium concentration in the
sodium depleted zone increased slightly due to the sodium-rich, overlayed ash.

     Since the positive electrode, "collection plate", was at all times
covered with a continuous layer of sodium depleted ash and there was no con-
ceivable way for the conditioned ash to penetrate this layer, it is concluded
that the sodium from the conditioned ash chemically diffused into the sodium-
depleted zone.  Apparently, it required about three days for the competing
processes, inward sodium migration due to chemical diffusion and outward
migration due to electric field polarity, to equilibrate under the
particular set of circumstances.

Collection Plate Doping

     Since a steel collection plate cannot furnish or give up sodium ions to
an adherent ash layer, it is called a blocking electrode and electrode
polarization occurs under negative corona.  If the collection plate possessed
an unlimited source of sodium or other mobile charge-carrying ions,  the
electrode blocking effect and the time dependent attenuation of current
density would not occur.  It is believed that the time dependent deterioration


                                      170

-------
of cold side precipitator performance  is  not  common  because  there  usually is
an unlimited source of alternate  charge carriers,  adsorbed sulfuric  acid
vapor.

     It follows that a source  of  charge carriers  provided to the collection
plate should overcome the effect  of  the blocking  electrode.   Therefore
several laboratory experiments were  conducted to  evaluate the effect of col-
lection plate doping; i.e.,  providing  the collection plate surface with a
large quantity of charge carriers.   This  was  done  in two ways:  a) an aqueous
solution containing 10 percent sodium  carbonate was  allowed  to  evaporate on
an electrode surface leaving a white film,  and b)  a  200-micron-thick layer of
minus 325 mesh borosilicate  glass containing  16.8% sodium as oxide in weight
percent was placed in a position  contiguous with  an  electrode surface.
     Three experiments were  conducted using a parallel  plate  resistivity cell.
 In each case a voltage of  2  kV was  continuously  applied to  a  0.4 cm layer of
 fly ash that contained 0.34% sodium by weight as oxide.   The  test cell was
 maintained at 470°C  in an  air environment  containing  1% water vapor.  Anode
 conditions evaluated  included clean stainless steel surfaces  and the two
 doped surfaces described above.

     Current was monitored as a function of time of applied voltage, and these
 data are given in Figure 5.   In each case  for a  very  short  time, the current
 increased.  This could be  due to the establishment of good  particle contact
 and/or the migration  of the  carrier ions located in most favorable positions.
 The rapid and pronounced attenuation of current  with  time for the electrode
 set without doping is typical for the voltage applied and the test tempera-
 ture.  In 7 days, the current decreased by a factor of  20.  Doping the anode
 surface with either  a thin layer of high sodium  glass or a  film of sodium
 carbonate caused a great reduction  in the  rate at which the current/time
 relationship decreased.

     The thin layer  of pulverized glass represented a simulation of a high
 sodium porcelain enamel coating on  a steel collection plate.  After 132 hours,
 the current flowing  through  this composite of 0.02 cm of glass and 0.38 cm of
 ash was still over an order  of magnitude greater than the current flowing in
 the undoped specimen.  The effect would be even  more  pronounced if the test
 were run using constant current density instead  of constant applied voltage.

     In the case of  doping with sodium carbonate, an  attempt  was made to
 simulate the effect  of ending a precipitator washing  operation by saturating
 the adherent ash layer with  a 10% aqueous  solution of sodium  carbonate.  This
 procedure caused a great change in  the current/time relationship.  After 180
 hours, the current flowing through  the layer doped with sodium carbonate was
 almost 50 times as great as  the current passing  through the ash layer with no
 doping.  Assuming that the current/time relationship  for the  sodium carbonate
 doping experiment would eventually  develop the same curve shape as the other
 two curves shown in Figure 5,  one would anticipate that this  remedial
 technique would be required  on a very infrequent basis.

                                       171

-------
     To demonstrate that the desirable effect due to the deposition of a  thin
film of sodium carbonate on the anode was truly related to sodium migration,
a 0.02 cm layer of ash contiguous with the cathode was chemically analyzed
after the 180 hour test was completed.  This sample of ash, which at the
start of the test contained 0.34% sodium as oxide in weight percent, now
contained 4.5% sodium.

     The effect of collection plate doping was also evaluated using a wire/
plate corona discharge device.   A layer of minus 325 mesh borosilicate glass
0.01 cm thick was placed on the "collection plate" and was covered with 0.49
cm of low sodium ash.  Current density was determined as a function of time
for a voltage of -10 kV in dry air at 372°C.

     After 132 hours, the current density had decreased from an initial value
of 81 nA/cm2 to 50 nA/cm2 for an experiment without doping.  In the same  time
period, the current density had increased about 20% for a similar test with
doping.

                                 CONCLUSIONS

     • To accompany previously described electrical data, chemical evidence
has been obtained to demonstrate the depletion of sodium in a thin layer of
ash contiguous with a positive electrode.  From the data acquired, one can
calculate that the resistivity of this thin layer of ash can be in excess of
1 x 1013 ohm cm under certain conditions.

     • A laboratory experiment to simulate the effect of sodium conditioning
in a hot side precipitator has been successfully executed.   These data
suggest that sodium enriched fly ash collected on top of a sodium depleted
ash layer conditions this high resistivity material by the chemical diffusion
of sodium ions toward the collection plate.

     • Laboratory experiments indicate that electrode doping, supplying the
collection electrode surface with a source of charge-carrying ions, is a
potential remedial procedure to overcome the problem of time dependent
precipitator performance loss.

                               ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     Funds for this research were principally supplied by Southern Company
Services, Inc., the Electric Power Research Institute,  and the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency.

                                  ENDNOTES

1.  R. E. Bickelhaupt, "An Interpretation of the Deteriorative Performance of
    Hot-Side Precipitators," JAPCA j30_:882 (1980).

2a.  R. E. Bickelhaupt, "Electrical Volume Conduction of Fly Ash," JAPCA
    24:251 (1974).
                                      172

-------
2b.  R.  E.  Bickelhaupt, "Volume Resistivity-Fly  Composition Relationship "
    ENVIRON.  SC. TECH £:336  (1975).

3.   Private communication with G. B. Nichols, Southern  Research Institute.

4.   P.  B.  Lederman, P. B. Bibbo,  and J.  Bush, "Chemical Conditioning of Fly
    Ash for Hot-Side Precipitation," EPA-600/7-79-044a,  pp 79-98, Environ-
    mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, February 1979.

5.   J.  P.  Gooch, R. E. Bickelhaupt, and L.  E. Sparks, "Fly Ash Conditioning
    by Co-Precipitation-with Sodium Carbonate," EPA-600/9-80-039a, pp 132-153,
    Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle  Park, NC,
    September 1980.

6.  J.  P.  Gooch, et al, "Improvement of Hot-Side Precipitator Performance
    with  Sodium Conditioning - An Interim Report," JAPCA 3l_:     (1981).

7.  R.  E. Bickelhaupt,  "High Resistivity Behavior of Hot-Side Electrostatic
    Precipitators," EPA-600/7-80-076,  Environmental Protection Agency,
    Research Triangle Park,  NC,  April  1980.
                                       173

-------
CM
 o
1
            . RHO = 1.3 x 10** ohm-cm
ENVIRONMENT:  AIR/1% WATER
TEMPERATURE:  471°C (880°F)
         ASH:  -200 MESH, 0.34% Na20
1-
tn
2
iu 2
a
Y-
z
111
x
§ 1
u

n
L E: 5 kV/cm
T TEST CELL: PARALLEL PLATE






•x
** — »^L^^ RHO = 2.5 x

I I I 1 1 I



""""



-
1010 ohm-cm
\
1 <
              20       40      60       80      100

                                   TIME, hours
                                                         120
                                                                 140
                                                                          160
              Figure 1.   Current density vs. time of applied voltage.
           0.0
                           1             2             3

                            DISTANCE FROM ANODE, mm
                                     4


                                 4260-59
               Figure 2.   Suggested sodium concentration profile.
                                    174

-------
                         ©COMMENCE TESTING
                         © ADD SODIUM
                                        50    60    70

                                       DAYS AFTER WASHING
                               ® 0.96% Na20
                               © 1.91% NajO
Figure 3.   Chronological display of Lansing Smith Data.  Data taken from
            ESP which is followed by a cold-side ESP (from Reference 6).
                                                      hot-side
              100


               90

               80


               70

               60


               50

               40

               30


               20


               10
ENVIRONMENT: DRY AIR AT345°C
CONDITIONED ASH PLACED OVER ADHERENT
LAYER OF "DEGRADED" ASH 	
                                  •f*— PHASE 2—»|
                                     ,cP"~
                                        o-—•o  _
     Figure 4.    Laboratory simulation of the effect of sodium conditioning.
1
a 10'4
1 1
%
cc
1 10-5
10'6
c
1 1 1 1 1
,,-—•—•• 	 • 	 • 	
•^*^ — 	 • 	


— • NO DOPING ' ' 	 	 	 ._ ~
• ANODE DOPED WITH SODIUM CARBONATE FILM
* ANODE DOPED WITH BOROSILICATE GLASS
11 1 '
30 60 90 120 150 18
TIME, hours ,„„_,
Figure 5.   Effect of anode doping on attenuation of current/time relationship.
                                    175

-------
          EVALUATION OF THE UNITED McGILL ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR

           By:  David S. Ensor, Phil A. Lawless, and Ashok S. Damle
                Research Triangle Institute
                P. 0. Box 12194
                Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27709
                                   ABSTRACT

     A United McGill electrostatic precipitator installed on an industrial
coal-fired boiler was evaluated during a field test.  Included in the testing
were measurements of particle size distribution from 0.05 to 10 ym diameter,
opacity, mass concentration, resistivity, and plant parameters.  The particle
size dependent efficiency, rapping losses, and power requirements are re-
ported for the unit.

                                 INTRODUCTION

Objective

     The objective was the evaluation of the technology associated with the
United McGill electrostatic precipitator.  The data were used to develop a
computer model describing the specific conditions in the precipitator.  A
secondary objective not reported in this paper because of its exploratory na-
ture was the development of new test methods to characterize the flow distri-
bution in precipitators.  This paper reports the overall performance of the
precipitator and the particle size distribution results.

Background

     The United McGill is a precipitator of innovative design.  Energized
plates rather than wires are used for discharge electrodes.  The unusual de-
sign motivated a two-week field test program.

                 DESCRIPTION OF THE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR

Design

     The precipitator consists of rows of plates parallel to the direction of
gas flow.  Alternate plates have needles installed on the leading and trailing
edges.  These points act as corona sites when the plate is energized.  The
other plates are grounded and act as collectors.  Both the energized and
grounded plates are rapped from the side.  Specific design features are
listed in Table 1.  The plate spacing of 0.08 m is much narrower than con-
ventional precipitators.  The precipitator is modular in design.  It is fab-
ricated in sections at a central manufacturing facility and assembled at  the
site.                                176

-------
Site

     The precipitators were  installed  on  an  industrial  boiler  fired with
eastern subbituminous coal.   The  coal  typically was  12  percent ash, two per-
cent sulfur, and had a heat  value of  12500 BTU/lb.   Two separate precipita-
tors were installed in parallel with  installation  gate  valves  at each inlet.
During the tests, the boiler load was  low enough to  allow diversion of all
the flue gas through one precipitator.

                                  TEST  METHODS

Overview

     A series of comprehensive test methods  were used during a two-week field
test.  However, no compliance test methods were used.   The particle size
distribution and the charge-to-mass ratio of ash entering and  leaving the
precipitator were determined.  Supporting measurements  included:  ash re-
sistivity, flue gas sulfur oxides, boiler operation, and precipitator
controls.

Size Distribution

     The size distribution was measured with cascade impactors for particle
diameters greater than 0.5 ym and with electrical  aerosol analyzers and
optical particle counters for particles less than  5  ym  diameter.  The
Meteorology Research, Inc.,  Model 1502 Cascade Impactor was used at both the
inlet and outlet of the precipitator.  Generally,  the procedures described
by Wilson(1) were followed.   Short sampling  times  of about one minute were
used at the inlet.  One half of the jet holes on the last stage of the impac-
tors used in the inlet tests were blocked to reduce  the particle size cutoff
by 40 percent.  The outlet impactor tests were conducted for about two hours
to obtain weighable samples.  The substrates, Apiezon M coated stainless
foil, were weighted on a Perkin-Elmer  microbalance to 0.01 mg.  Each day
four tests were conducted at the  inlet and two parallel tests  were conducted
at the outlet of the precipitator.  The rapping emissions were also conducted
by sampling alternately with two  separate pairs of impactors.  One pair was
used during rapping, and the other was used  between  rapping.

     Supporting measurements included  velocity traverse and Orsat measure-
ments.  Two ultrafine sampling systems were  used,  one at the inlet and the
other at the outlet.  Both systems contained an electrical aerosol analyzer
and a Climet optical particle counter.  The  inlet  system had three porous
wall dilution stages.  One was located in the stack; the other two stages,
outside.  The combined maximum dilution range was  up to 2000 to 1.  The out-
let dilution system was a single  porous wall diluter in the stack.

Charge-to-Mass Probe

     The charge-to-mass of the particulate was measured at the inlet and
outlet of the precipitator with a filter  probe similar  to that developed by
Denver Research Institute.   A standard 47 mm filter  holder was insulated
from the probe and placed in a Faraday cage.  A curved  inlet sampling nozzle

                                     177

-------
was used to obtain isokinetic sampling.   The  charge  collected by the filter
holder was measured with an electrometer  with a  strip  chart  output.

Ash Resistivity

     The ash resistivity was measured with an in-situ  probe  developed by
Southern Research Institute using the procedures described by Smith  et al.(2)
In addition, ash samples were analyzed for chemical  composition  and  the re-
sults used in a resistivity prediction program described by  Bickelhaupt.(3)

     Sulfur oxides were measured by the controlled condensation  method de-
scribed by Cheney and Homolya.(4)  The condensate and  impinger catches were
analyzed with ion chromatography.

                                 TEST RESULTS

Overview

     A summary of the test results will be presented with emphasis on the
size distribution results.  The details of the study and the  results  of  the
special test work is summarized in the final report.(5)  The  overall  results
will be covered, first, with a discussion of the size  distribution data  and,
finally, aspects of the electrostatic precipitator performance evaluation.

Overall Results

     The overall test results are sumarized in Table 2.  The  tests were  con-
ducted with gas volumetric flow rates slightly higher  than design.  The  ef-
ficiencies were consistent with previous  tests at the  site, and  the emis-
sions were within any applicable limitations.  Of particular  interest  was
the large emission of particles re-entrained during rapping.  Often during
the test, rapping puffs were visible from the stack.

Particle Size Distribution

     The results of the size distribution measurements are shown in Fig-
ures la to 2b.  The data are presented in the form of  dM/dlogD as a function
of particle diameter on semilogarithmic coordinates.   The area under  the
curve is proportional to total mass concentration.   Because of the wide
range in concentrations, the cascade impactor data are plotted separately
from the fine particle results.   The distribution was  bimodal, similar to
that reported by Markowski et al.(6)

     The rapping loss size dependence is shown in Figure 3.   Over 80  percent
of the emission was due to rapping re-entrainment.   The cumulative distribu-
tion of the rapping puff is shown in Figure 4.  The mean diameter and
standard deviation are similar to that reported by Gooch and  Marchant.(7)

Size Dependent Penetration

     The particle size dependent penetration was computed by  taking the
ratio of outlet to inlet particle size distributions.  The particle size

                                     178

-------
dependent penetrations are shown  in  Figure  5.   The measurements  from cascade
impactors and the fine particle measuring system  are  shown.   It  was noticed
that a discrepancy existed between the  impactors  taken  under  rapping condi-
tions and the ultrafine particle  results.   While  good agreement  existed for
the nonrapping case.  The rapping emissions were  of sufficient concentration
to cause unstable conditions  even though an averaging volume  was used.
Thus, the stable in between rapping  conditions  were used  in the  fine parti-
cle results.

Electrical Conditions

Voltage-Current Curves

     The voltage-current  (V-I) curves were  taken  at the end of each day with
the boiler and precipitator operating identically to  the  test condition.
One section at a time was evaluated  with the other sections energized.  The
V-I curves changed during the test with the operating currents increasing
by 25 to 30 percent during the test.  The change  in the V-I characteristic
is believed to be due to ash  layer changes  caused by  the  combustion of oil
during a pulverizer malfunction midway  through  the test.  The average opera-
tion power is presented in Table  3.  The difference between the  character-
istics of Section 3 and the other sections.   Hypothesis of plate alignment
or heavy plate ash deposits are inadequate  to explain the discrepancy.

Power Input

     The power input was obtained from  the  secondary  voltage  and current
and is reported in Table 3.   The  power  was  slightly lower on  the low load
cases than reported for conventional precipitators.

Resistivity

     The resistivity was measured with  an in-situ probe,  reported by Smith
et al.(2) and a computer prediction  reported by Bickelhaupt(3).  The results
are summarized in Table 3 and Figure 5.  The precipitator was operated at a
temperature corresponding to  the  maximum on the curve.

     The difference between the in-situ data and  the  prediction  is believed
to be due to the high carbon  content of the ash.  The SO3 content was found
not to be important in the determination.

Modeling

     The model of the precipitator is described by Lawless et al.(8) and
for that reason will not be described here.   The  geometry was approximated
by a single wire instead of needles.

                                  CONCLUSIONS

     The precipitator was performing as designed, in  compliance  with appli-
cable regulations.  However,  about 80 percent of  the  emissions measured re-
sulted from plate rapping rather  than direct penetration  through the

                                     179

-------
precipitator.  In addition, the emissions were found to be very  dependent on
gas velocity.

                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     This work was conducted as part of a Cooperative Agreement  No.  R-805897-03
with the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  The cooperation of
Mr. V. F. Wilkerson of the North Carolina Finishing Division  of  Fieldcrest
Mills, Inc., and Dr. C. G. Noll of the United McGill Corporation is  greatly
appreciated.

                                   ENDNOTES

1.  Wilson, R., Jr., P. Cavanaugh, K. Gushing, W. Farthing, and  W- Smith.
    Guildelines for Particulate Sampling in Gaseous Effluents from Industrial
    Process.  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  EPA-600/ -79-028,  1979.

2.  Smith, W. B., K. M. Gushing, J. D. McCain.  Procedures Manual for Electro-
    static Precipitation Evaluation.  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    EPA-600/7-77-059.

3.  Bickelhaupt, R. E.  A Technique for Predicting Fly Ash Resistivity.
    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  EPA-600/7-79-204, 1979-

4.  Cheney, J. L., and J. B. Homolya.  Sampling Parameters for Sulfate Meas-
    urement and Characterization.  EST.  13:584-588, 1979.

5.  Ensor, D. S., P. A. Lawless, A. S. Damle, A. D. Shendrikar,  A. S. Viner,
    and E. R. Kashdan.  Evaluation of the United McGill Electrostatic Pre-
    cipitator.  Report in preparation to EPA as part of Cooperative Agreement.

6.  Markowski, G. R., D. S. Ensor, R. G. Hooper, and R. C. Carr.  A  Submicron
    Aerosol Mode in Flue Gas from a Pulverized Coal Utility Boiler.  EST  14:
    1400, 1980.

7.  Gooch, J. P., and G. H. Marchant.  Electrostatic Precipitator Rapping Re-
    Entrainment and Computer Model Studies.  Electric Power Research Institute
    Report No. EPRI FP-792, 1978.

8.  Lawless, P. A., J. W. Dunn, and L. E. Sparks.  A Computer Model  for  ESP
    Performance.  Presented at the EPA Third Symposium on the Transfer and
    Utilization of Particulate Control Technology, Orlando, Florida,
    March 9-12, 1981.
                                     180

-------
                          TABLE  1.   DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
          Manufacturer
          Model
          Gas volume treated
            (both precipitators)
          Plate area
          Plate height
          Design SCA
          Fields
          Plate spacing
          Plate thickness
            Collector
            Discharge
United McGill
4-400 x 2 EP
70.8 n>3/sec at  193°C (150,000 acfm at 380°F)

8.070 m2 (86,880 ft2)
3.05 m (10 ft)
108 m2/m3/sec  (549 ft2/k acfm)
4
0.08 m (3.15 in.)

2.1 mm (0.082 in.)
1.9 mm (0.075 in.)
                         TABLE 2.   SUMMARY OF  TEST RESULTS
Condition
High load
Low load
During rapping
(high load)
Between rapping
(high load)
Boiler
/k Ib steam \
V hr /
131
126
132
132
SCA
[m2/(m3/sec) ]
92
100
96
96
Inlet
(mg/DNm3)
3970
3860
2980
2980
Outlet
(mg/DNm3)
383
99.7
828
18
Penetration
(percent)
9.65
2.58
27.8
0.6
Efficiency
(percent)
90.4
97.4
72.2
99.4
Design SCA -  108 m2/(m3/sec)
                          TABLE  3.   OPERATING CONDITIONS
             Resistivity
                 Measured
                 Predicted from ash composition
             Power
                 93 - 122 w/(acfm/1000)
             Secondary Voltage and Current:*
                           1
                           2
                           3
                           4
                 1 x 1013  fi-cm
                 2 x 1012  n-cm
            Voltage (kV)
                30
                23.2
                20
                24.5
Current  (ma)
    27
    70

   110
             Sulfuric Acid
             Sulfur Dioxide
             Excess Oxygen
             Average Opacity
   12 ppm
 1430 ppm
    9%
  2-7%
             *  Low load conditions.
                                            181

-------
                1NLET DISTRIBUTION
                                               300-1
                                                           INLET ULTRHFINE DISTRIBUTION
   7-
   6-
I
o
g
   3-
   2-
   1-
                1           10          102

             PHTSICRL DIRMETER (MICROMETERS)
                                            PHTSICfiL DIBMETER (MICROMETERS)
Figure la.   Inlet particle size dis-
              tribution  determined by
              cascade impactor.
                               Figure Ib.   Inlet particle  size dis-
                                             tribution  determined by
                                             ultrafine  sampling system.
  .5-
  .4-
  .1-
                OLJTLET DISTRIBUTION
                                                8-
                                                6-
                                                4-
                                                2-
    .1
               1          10

            PHTSICRL DIRMETER (MICROMETERS)
                                                           OUTLET ULTRRFINE DISTRIBUTION
                                   .01
                                                                           -I—i—I  I I i I I
                                                          PHTSICRL DIRMETER (MICROMETERS)
Figure 2a.   Outlet particle  size dis-  Figure 2b.   Outlet particle size dis-
                                                           tribution determined by
tribution  determined by
cascade impactor.
                                                           ultrafine sampling  system.
                                           182

-------
 2.S-,
              RflP - NO RHP DISTRIBUTION
 1.5H
                1            10

             PHTSJCRL DIRMETER (MICROMETERS)
                                        IBB
                                                  99.9-1
                                                  99.64
                                                  99. &J
                                                    70-
                                      30-
                                      2B-

                                      10-
                                       5-

                                       2-
                                       1- '
                                      .5-
                                      .2-
                                      .1--
                                        .1
                                                                RRPPINB PUFF DISTRIBUTION
Figure  3.
Comparison of  rapping
emission between  rapping.
Figure  4,
PMTSIOHL DIRMETER (MICROMETERS)

 Cumulative particle size
 distribution  of  the
 rapping  puff.
                         §
                         i
                           -Bid
                                           PENETRRTION
                                           OPTICHL
                                           PBRTICLE COUNTER
                                ELECTRICflt
                                REROSOL HNHLTZEfl
                                                 1MPRCTOR - NO RRP
                          1E-B31	1	1  iiin	
                             .1                 1                 IB
                                     PHTSICBL OIHMETER (MICROMETERS)
                         Figure 5.   Particle  size  dependent
                                      penetration  through  the
                                      baghouse.
                                             183

-------
                               X In Situ Measurements
                               • Computed from Ash Composition
                              Average
                              Precipitstor
                              Operating
                              Temperature
                         2.2     2.0
                          1000/T, IT1
                         359     441
                        Temperature (°F)
Figure 6.   Particle resistivity from in-situ
             measurement  and prediction  from
             composition  following  Bickelhaupt(S)
                            184

-------
                              PREDICTING THE EFFECT
       OF PROPRIETARY CONDITIONING AGENTS ON FLY ASH RESISTIVITY

        Raymond J. Jaworowski, Technical Director, International Operations
             3ohn 3. Lavin, Associate Director, Applications Engineering

                              Apollo Technologies Inc.
                                 One Apollo Drive
                            Whippany, New Jersey 07981


                                    ABSTRACT

     Fly ash resistivity plays an important  role  in the performance  of electrostatic
precipitators.   As ash resistivities approach  approximately 5 x 10    ohm-cm, opera-
tional problems occur.

     Recognition of flue gas conditioning agents as a means to lower ash resistivity has
placed increased emphasis  on the development of predictive methods to determine how
the resistivity will be influenced by a specific chemical.

     Based on  previous  work  by  Bickelhaupt  and Sparks,  a correlation  has  been
developed to predict the effects of proprietary  chemicals  on fly ash  resistivity.  The
correlation is relatively insensitive to temperature, field strength, and coal type.

     Data from field trials are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
Excellent agreement between predicted and measured results has been obtained.

                                 INTRODUCTION

     Fly ash resistivity plays  a  significant role in the design of electrostatic precipi-
tators.  As fly ash  resistivities approach and exceed approximately 5  x 10   ohm-cm,
operational problems  occur.    Many  of these  problems  can  be  controlled in the
specification stage, by changing  various  parameters in the precipitator design such as
collecting area, residence time,  precipitator power, and the use of "hot side" precipi-
tators.  However, when a precipitator already exists it  is virtually impossible to change
most of these parameters, with the  possible exception of additional power. In the case
where  resistivity problems impair performance or when a projected shift in coal supply
might  result in a resistivity problem it  becomes important  to  be able to measure or
predict the resistivity of the fly ash  as it  exits the boiler.

     With  problem  resistivities  it  is equally  important  to be able  to  predict if a
significant reduction  in  resistivity  can  be  accomplished through the  use of chemical
conditioning agents.   This information  can then be used  to determine the degree of
improvement in precipitator performance to be  expected through the use of fly ash
conditioning .(1)

     A significant volume of work  exists  describing relationships between  fly ash
resistivity  and various  other  parameters, including chemical  composition,  flue gas
temperature, dew point, etc. (2,3,4,5)  Recently  Bickelhaupt and Sparks (6) published a
                                        185

-------
comprehensive technique for predicting  fly ash resistivity, which is based on Bickel-
haupt's previous work on calculating bulk resistivity from  fly ash elemental analysis.
This report includes a computer program to calculate bulk resistivity and then allows
adjustments for flue  gas moisture concentration,  applied electrical  stress, and sulfur
trioxide (SO-) content in the flue gas.  Development of the SOjresistivity relationship
involved modifying the ASTM bulk resistivity probe (7) to allow measurement of a 1-mm
ash layer after an equilibration time of 16-18 hours.  This process was then extrapolated
to estimate the effect on resistivity of additional SO, conditioning.

      In view  of  the  importance  of resistivity modification to the  utility industry, a
study was  undertaken to  correlate data obtained from  actual field  trials with  the
existing Bickelhaupt  and Sparks program, to determine if  a  procedure to predict  the
effect of  proprietary flue gas  conditioning agents  on fly  ash  resistivity  could be
developed.  This report describes the results of this investigation.

                      BICKELHAUPT/SPARKS CALCULATIONS

      Bickelhaupt  and Sparks have developed an expression to  calculate the basic (bulk)
resistivity  as a function of ash composition. This equation was then modified to include
expressions for temperature, moisture, sulfur trioxide concentration, and the ash layer
field  strength. The results have been incorporated into a computer  program which is
part of the published paper. The input data required and output from the program  are
shown in Table I.  While  complete ultimate and ash analyses are desirable, the program
actually requires knowledge of only moisture and sulfur dioxide (SO_) concentrations in
the flue gas and atomic  concentrations of lithium, sodium, magnesium, calcium, and
iron.  The  program makes a few assumptions, such as flue  gas composition is based on
30% excess air, the SO, concentration is 0.4% of the SO- level in the  flue gas, and that
the ash resistivity is measured at a field strength of TO kilovolts per  cm.  Based on
these assumptions, the output data can be plotted as shown in Figure 1 to yield a typical
temperature resistivity  curve.   Field   tests at  six  power  stations  comparing   the
predicted resistivity with actual in situ measurements showed good correlation.

                     CORRELATION OF APOLLO FIELD DATA

      Five  flue gas conditioning  trials were selected where sufficient information had
been  obtained  to  use in a correlation  analysis.   Table  II lists the pertinent boiler,
precipitator, flue  gas, and fly ash information for each  station.  Table III lists  the
chemical additive type and feed rate, the resulting measured baseline (untreated) and
treated resistivities, and the calculated baseline resistivities.  Actual moisture and SO-
concentrations were used to calculate baseline predicted resistivity values, as ultimate
coal analyses were not  performed during these early trials.  Field  resistivities were
obtained in situ using a probe of the SRI design.

      The effect of resistivity  modifiers can be calculated using the expression for  the
sum of parallel resistances (Equation  1) stated in terms of resistivity  if the correlation
factor is known.
           />t=  Pbxpc                                                        (1)
                                        186

-------
where:
                       pt = treated (final) resistivity
                       pb = baseline (untreated) resistivity
                       pc = surface resistivity resulting from adsorption of
                                additive (correlation factor)

      Rearranging  Equation  1 to  allow  direct  calculation of  the additive  surface
resistivity component yields the expression shown in Equation 2:

            fc=  Pbxpt
      The additive surface resistivity values then  were calculated using the measured
baseline and treated resistivity values, and are also listed in Table III.  A plot of these
results vs. additive concentration is shown in Figure 2.  A correlation coefficient of 0.901
was obtained from the 11 data points.

      These results  were  very encouraging and  further examination of  the field data
indicated the following conclusions:

      A.    Field resistivity measurements were insensitive to the  field strength used in
            the in situ resistivity probe.

      B.    Temperature  effects were  minimal.   This  is  due to  the  fact  that  the
            additives have extremely low vapor pressures as compared to SO., over the
            temperature range evaluated.

      C.    Additive performance response did not appear to be directly related to coal
            type. The resulting equation fit Bickelhaupt's classification for eastern and
            western coals, as well as Texas Lignite.

                               FIELD TRIAL RESULTS

      Three different sites were chosen to evaluate  the ability to predict resistivity
modification through the use of the correlation factor just developed. Table IV lists the
pertinent boiler, precipitator,  and fly ash information for these trials. Flue gas analysis
(percent moisture, ppm   SO2) was used in the program rather than the ultimate coal
analysis to calculate th^ flue  gas chemistry, and the field strength was  assumed to be
10 KV/cm.  In all cases the baseline resistivity was calculated using the Bickelhaupt/
Sparks equation, and that result was used to  calculate treated resistivities using the
correlation factor shown in Figure 2.  The  additive shown had  been selected for use at
the stations based on previous evaluations.  These results are shown in Table V.

      Field  measurements of  resistivity  were  then   made  for  both  the  untreated
(baseline) and treated cases.  In addition, a second set of resistivity calculations  was
made for the treated case using the measured baseline resistivity.   All of these results
are shown in Table  V.   At two of the three  stations (Ma and  BB)  excellent agreement
was obtained between the  calculated and measured  resistivities for  both the treated and
untreated cases.  In addition, the calculated resistivities from  the measured baseline
were  also in excellent  agreement with the measured treated readings.  These results
show  that in most cases chemical additive performance can be predicted from either a
calculated or measured baseline resistivity  level.   The  agreement obtained between
calculated and measured results is well within the experimental reproducibility normally

                                         187

-------
associated with in situ field resistivity measurements.

      At station  "FC"  (Table  V)  as well as at station "A" (Table  III) the  predicted
resistivities were significantly lower than those measured  during the field trials.  The
reasons for  this are not fully  understood at this time,  but it is possible that errors in
coal analysis due to nonhomogeneity of the coal supply may have occurred.  A second
possibility is  that  the higher ratio of  sodium, potassium,  and iron to calcium and
magnesium in these two cases may bias the computer calculation.  Additional data is
currently being examined to determine if this inconsistency is real.

                          PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE

      A significant  improvement in precipitator performance was found with the use of
additives at all the stations in this study, both  those for the correlation development
and  for  the final field trials.  In many cases,  improvements were greater than those
expected through theoretical  considerations. (1)   The field data is currently being
reviewed to determine the contribution to performance improvement by both resistivity
changes  and other factors such as reentrainment, space  charge  modification, etc. This
information  will be  reported as  soon as  the  investigation is complete,  but some
preliminary results  are listed in Table VI.

                                   CONCLUSION

      The Bickelhaupt/Sparks equation is a useful tool for predicting resistivity from  fly
ash chemistry.  By extending this equation, it is now possible to predict the effect of
proprietary  chemical additives on fly  ash  resistivity.  The  developed correlation has
been tested in three field trials with excellent results. In addition  to  demonstrating
resistivity predictability,  significant relationships  between  electrostatic  precipitator
performance and resistivity have been observed.  These  relationships are  being fully
evaluated and will be reported  in a subsequent work.
                                        188

-------
                                    ENDNOTES


1.    Sparks, L. E.,  SR-52 Programmable Calculator  Programs for Venturi  Scrubbers
     and Electrostatic Precipitators, EPA-600/7-78-026, 1978.

2.    Wagoner, C. L., et al, Fuel and Ash Evaluation to Predict Electrostatic Precipi-
     tator Performance.  Presented at the ASME/IEEE 3oint Power Generation Confer-
     ence, Long Beach, Calif., Sept. 18-21, 1977.

3.    Bickelhaupt, R.  E.,  Influence  of  Fly  Ash Compositional Factors on  Electrical
     Volume Resistivity, EPA-650/2-74-074, 197*.

*.    Bickelhaupt, R. E., Effect of Chemical Composition on Surface Resistivity of Fly
     Ash, EPA-600/2-75-017, 1975.

5.    Maartmann, Sten, The  Effect  of Gas  Temperature  and  Dew  Point on Dust
     Resistivity  and thus the Collecting  Efficiency  of  Electrostatic Precipitators,
     Second  International  Clean  Air  Congress  of the  International  Union of Air
     Pollution Prevention Association, Washington, D.C., 1970.

6.   Bickelhaupt,  R. E.  and  Sparks,  L.  E.,  A  Technique for  Predicting Fly Ash
     Resistivity, EPA 600/7-79-20*, 1979.

7.   American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Power Test Code 28, Determining the
     Properties of Fine Particulate Matter; Section 4.05, Method for Determination of
     Bulk Electrical Resistivity, 1965.
                                        189

-------
                TABLE I: PROGRAM DATA INPUT AND OUTPUT"
      Data Input

1.     Ultimate Coal Analysis (%)

            C, H, O, N, S, HO, ash
      Coal Ash Analysis (%)
Li2O,

CaO,

Ti02,
                           , MgO,
                       S0
      Field Strength (KV/cm)

            Actual or 10
                                   Used by Program

                             1.    Flue Gas Composition

                                         % H2O, ppmy SO2
                              2.     Atomic
           Li + Na, Mg + Ca, Fe
                              3.    Same
Typical Program Output

TEMP 1QOO/T(K)     DEG K
      1.*
      1.6
      1.8
      2.0
      2.2
      2.4
      2.6
      2.8
                   DEGC
DEGF   RHO(VS)
RHO(VSA)
714
625
556
500
455
417
385
357
441
352
283
227
182
144
112
84
826
666
541
441
359
291
233
183
2.2E+09
1.6E+10
1.1E+11
6.3E+11
1.2E+12
7.3E+11
2.6E+11
2.1E+10
2.2E+09
1.6E+10
1.1E+11
3.9E+11
7.1E+10
5.5E+09
-
_
where:
RHO(VS) = Resistivity excluding SO- effect

RHO(VSA) = Resistivity including SO, effect
                                     190

-------
          TABLE II;  BOILER AND FLY ASH DATA FOR CORRELATION
Station:
Load (Mw):
Boiler Manufacturer:
ESP SCA (ft2/ 1000 acfm):
ESP Temperature (°F):
Firing Method:
C
350
C.E.
135
250
P.C.
Coal Type: Western
Proximate Coal Analysis
Ash (%):
Sulfur (%):
Moisture (%):
Flue Gas Analysis
Moisture (%):
SO2 (ppmy):
Elemental Coal Analysis*
Si02 (%):
A1203(%):
Fe203 (%):
MgO (%):
CaO (%):
Na-O (%):
/
K20 (%):
Li2O (%):
6
0.5
12
6
370
64.68
22.23
3.37
0.40
7.34
0.69
1.29
#•»
G
100
C.E.
209
360
P.C.
Western
5-8
0.6
6.5
7
500
54.7
18.5
8.9
0.8
16.7
0.5
0.8
*#
Mo
575
C.E.
186
380
P.C.
Lignite
13.5
0.5
31
15.5
490
55.92
26.02
4.30
2.58
10.32
0.11
0.75
**
A
146
C.E.
352
350
P.C.
Eastern
13.5
1.7
3.7
7
1250
52.4
29.8
11.6
0.1
2.3
4.9
2.7
0.1
B
700
C.E.
145
275
P.C.
Eastern
13.8
1.5
6.5
8
800
50.82
24.07
19.21
0.52
1.45
0.62
3.31
**
*Corrected to 100% total.
**Not analyzed; assumed less than 0.1%.
                                  191

-------
  TABLE III: CHEMICAL ADDITIVES AND RESISTIVITY DATA FOR CORRELATION
Station
  Mo
  A
  B



Measured
Surface
Fly Ash Resistivity

Additive
LPA-40


LPA-410M



LPA-40

LPA-410


LPA-40

LPA-40


(GPT)
0
0.10
0.15
0.15
0.30
0.40
0.50
0
0.20
0
0.15
0.20
0
0.15
0
0.15
Treatment Rate
(ppm )
™»_*_™™y_
0
3.2
4.7
2.1
4.8
6.3
7.9
0
6.9
0
9
12
0
4.4
0
5.1
Resistivity
Factor
(10 ohm-cm) (10 oTim-cm)
6.9 (3.0)*
3.0
1.7
2.4
1.5
0.9
0.7
5.1 (3.5)*
0.8
3.5 (5.8)*
0.5
0.2
10.0 (0.03)*
3.5
1.0 (2.4)*
0.40

5.3
2.3
3.7
1,9
1.1
0.8
_
0.95
—
0.6
0.2
_
5.4
_
0.7
*Calculated Baseline Resistivities from Bickelhaupt/Sparks Program
GPT = Gallons of Additive per Ton of Coal Fired
                                      192

-------
           TABLE IV; BOILER AND ASH DATA FROM FIELD TRIALS
Station:
Load (Mw):
Boiler Manufacturer:
ESP S.C.A. (ft /1000 acfrn):
ESP Temperature (°F)
Firing Method:
Coal Type:
Proximate Coal Analysis
Ash (%):
Sulfur (%):
Moisture (%):
Flue Gas Analysis
Moisture (%):
S02 (ppmv):
Elemental Coal Analysis*
Si02 (%):
A1203 (%):
Fe203 (%):
MgO (%):
CaO (%):
Na20 (%):
K20 (%):
Li2O (%):
Ma
400
C.E.
175
280
P.C.
Eastern

16.4
1.5
1.1

7
8000

64.2
26-4
5.7
0.1
1.0
0.7
3.5
**
BB
575
C.E.
156
370
P.C.
Lignite

14
0.75
24

13
1000

62.0
17.4
6.6
1.5
13.3
1.1
1.2
*#
FC
800
B&W
165
225
P.C.
Western

23
0.8
4.3

9
750

58.91
28.11
4.72
0.64
3.97
2.04
1.61
**
*Corrected to 100% total.
**Not analyzed; assumed less than 0.1%.
                                 193

-------
                       TABLE V; RESISTIVITY RESULTS


                         Treatment Rate   Fly Ash Resistivity (10  ohm-cm)
Station Additive         (GPMl(ppm )  Calculated*   Measured Calculated**

Ma     LPA-410M       0           0        3.0         1.3
                       0.10        4.1      1.*         0.81        0.89
                       0.20        8.2      0.5*        0.34        0.44

BB     LPA-410         0           0        2.0         3.0
                       0.20        9        0.4         0.4        0.42

FC     LPA-40          0           0        0.33        3.9
                       0.10        3.7      0.21        2.3        1.7

*From calculated baseline
**From measured baseline
            TABLE VI;  MEASURED PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE

                            Treatment Rate     Predicted        Measured
Station      Additive              (GPT)        Efficiency (%)     Efficiency (%)

A           LPA-40               0               94.9             92.2
                                 0.15            94.9             99.7
Ma         LPA-410M             0               92.0             91.5
                                 0.20            97.4             98.6
BB          LPA-410              0               85.3             95-9
                                 0.20            95.1             99.3
                                    194

-------
    1013
    1012--
 o
 I

'.c
 o
    101!.
cc
re
00
    109
                                                        LEGEND:

                                                       O RHO  (VS)

                                                       A RHO  (VSA)
1000/T (OK)   3.0   2.8    2.6    2.4    2.2    2.0   1.8    1.6   1.4   1.2


       (°C)   64     84    112    144   182    227   283    352   441    560

       (°F)  141    183    233    291   359    441   541    666   826  1041

                                   TEMPERATURE
           FIGURE  1   -    PREDICTED RESISTIVITY FOR THE COAL AND ASH  USED

                         TO ILLUSTRATE THE COMPUTER PROGRAM(6)


                                    195

-------
o
 I
o

 o
O
<
   TO
     111
     114-
00
LU
CtL

LU
C_3
   10
     10
                       log f>c = 12.0607 -  (0.1515  x  ppmv  additive)
                                  O
                     (D
         LEGEND:
                O  LPA-40
                0  LPA-410
                0  LPA-410 M
                                             Coefficient of Correlation
                                                   R = -0.901
                                     O
                              4     56      7     8     9     10
                                 ADDITIVE CONCENTRATION (ppmv)
                                                                     11
12
          FIGURE 2 - EFFECT OF ADDITIVE ON SURFACE RESISTIVITY FACTOR

                                     196

-------
                              S03 CONDITIONING
                                  TO ENABLE
                     ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS TO MEET
                             DESIGN EFFICIENCIES
                                    BY:
                              J. J. FERRIGAN III
                                WAHLCO,  INC.
                         SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA  29704
      This is a case study  involving a particular utility's and precipitator
manufacturer's problem of selecting an effective and reliable method of
increasing the collection efficiencies of  two new electrostatic precipitators
to their design specifications.  This paper  traces the study from the time
of erection of the two cold-side precipitators in the early 1970's to the
final solution which was 803 flue gas conditioning in 1979.

      We detail the mechanical modifications and consultant's recommendations
which were undertaken to no avail.  We point out that after all possible
mechanical fix-ups had been completed, proprietary chemical conditioning
of the flue gas was tried, which proved  to be more detrimental than good.
Finally, S03 flue gas conditioning was tried, and it brought both cold-side
precipitators into design compliance.  These facts are supported by
precipitator outlet grain loading tests, which show that 803 flue gas
conditioning enabled the precipitators to  operate under the .02 gr/scf limit.
INTRODUCTION

      This is a case study concerning two cold-side electrostatic
precipitators designed to collect fly ash generated from the burning of
low sulfur Eastern Bituminous Coal.  (See Table 1).  The two electrostatic
precipitators referred to as "A" and "B", were erected in 1973 and designed
to accommodate a flue gas volume of 110,000 ACM each.  The total specific
collecting area (SCA) for each precipitator is 600-K  The first three fields
have transformer-rectifiers rated at 700 MA and the last four fields are
rated at 1000 MA.   The two "NEW" electrostatic precipitators are preceded
by two "OLD" electrostatic precipitators which had been in operation for
twenty years (See Figure 1).  The two "NEW" electrostatic precipitators were
designed to operate at 99.8% efficiency with the "OLD" precipitators off line.

                                     197

-------
      In the first quarter of 1975 the precipitator manufacturer conducted
the first acceptance tests on "A" precipitator.   (See Table 2).  These
results indicated that there was trouble ahead.   The migration velocities
were extremely low with an average of 2.54 cm/sec.   The outlet grain loading
was a factor of ten away from the design outlet grain loading option of
0.02 gr/scf.  The power levels of the precipitators were also extremely low.
The highest reading obtainable on all seven T/R sets was 100 MA on the last
field.  These results pointed to a variety of possible problems.

SOLUTIONS

      The utility and precipitator manufacturer spent the next two years
investigating the problems with "A" and "B" precipitators.   They tried
several methods of increasing the efficiency of the precipitators.  Listed
below are the actions that were taken to increase the efficiency and the
results of ehese actions.

      1.  Power off rapping was initiated by the precipitator manufacturer
which resulted in no improvement of precipitator efficiency.

      2.  Saddle weights were added to the existing wire weights to reduce
slack in the discharge electrodes.  This step was initiated by the precipitator
manufacturer with no improvement of precipitator efficiency,

      3.  Flail hammer rappers were installed to measure the effectiveness
of this form of rapping versus the low frequency magnetic impulse rappers.
This program was initiated by the precipitator manufacturer with no
improvement of precipitator efficiency.

      4.  Lowering of the air heater outlet temperature to  reduce the resistivity
of the fly ash was attempted.  This step was initiated by the utility and
resulted in no improvement of precipitator efficiency.

      5.  An independent consultant was retained to determine why the
precipitator would not perform when low sulfur coal was being fired in the
boilers.  The consultant's final conclusion was  that further  rapping improvement
efforts should be initiated.  He also stated that the gas distribution was
acceptable.

       6.   A second  consultant was retained.  His conclusions were  that
 the  gas distribution was  poor and the subject precipitators should be fully
 optimized  by including  a  new rapping system, correcting  gas distribution
 and  adding transformer-rectifiers.  He also  stated  that  gas conditioning,
 utilizing  some  form of  sulfur oxide input  into  the  gas stream, would be
 quite effective in  lowering resistivity  and  increasing the efficiency of
 the  precipitators.

       7.   Finally the precipitator manufacturer  considered the use of flue
 gas  conditioning as a possible  solution  and  decided  to pursue proprietary
 chemical additives  as the method.

                                     198

-------
PROPRIETARY CHEMICAL GAS CONDITIONING

      The proprietary chemical  gas  conditioning  system was selected over S03
flue gas conditioning solely due  to capital  cost.   The total capital cost
for the proprietary chemical gas  conditioning  system vas approximately
$60,000.00 versus $180,000.00 for the  S03  flue gas  conditioning system.

      The proprietary chemical  gas  conditioning  system chosen is a process
which involves injecting a  liquid additive conditioning agent upstream of
the air preheater to reduce the resistivity  of the  fly ash.  The chemical is
injected upstream of the air preheater to  allow  for vaporization of the
conditioning agent.  The chemical constituents of the additive would not be
divulged by the manufacturer.   The  initial injection rate of the conditioning
agent was 0.1 gal/ton of coal which was eventually  raised to 0.3 gal/ton.
This conditioning agent had no  effect  on either  the stack opacity or the
power in the subject precipitator.   Eventually,  their chemical caused pluggage
of the air preheater  (5" pressure drop across  the air preheaters) .  The utility
had the chemical analyzed and found it to  be ammonium sulfate, (Nlfy^SO/!, and
60% H20.

      After failing with the ammonium  sulfate, the  utility was approached by
the precipitator manufacturer and asked their  permission to. inject a new
chemical.  The utility had  this new chemical analyzed and found it to be
Sodium Bisulfate  (NaHSOz^) and 60% 1^0.  This chemical was very acidic (PH<1)
and was very corrosive and  difficult to handle.  The utility allowed this
new conditioning agent to be tried  for a thirty-day period. (See Table 3).
The initial injection rate  of this  conditioning  agent was 0.1 gal/ton and
eventually was raised to 0.5 gal/ton with  no effect on the outlet grain
loading.  The emission rate was not within a factor of ten of meeting the
outlet option for contract  design guarantee  which was 0.02 gr/scf.  In addition,
after only one week of injection  of the chemical, the 304-stainless steel
atomizer tip on the injection nozzle was completely corroded away.

      Another major disadvantage  of the proprietary chemical conditioning
system was the operating cost.  The operating  cost  for injecting 0.3 gal/ton
of this chemical  into each  boiler "A"  and  "B"  was approximately $18,000.00/month.

      Needless to say the utility's view of  flue gas conditioning was not
very optimistic after this  episode, but nevertheless 803 flue gas conditioning
had to be considered  the only other viable solution to the existing problems
with the subject precipitators.

 S03 FLUE GAS  CONDITIONING

      From correspondence with other major utilities  it was discovered  that
 they were using,  quite  successfully, S03 flue  gas  conditioning to help
maintain particulate  collection efficiency and opacity requirements.  After
consulting these electric utilities, field  trips  were  conducted to observe
 the systems in operation.   The  major point that  was made clear by the other
operating utilities was  that  S03  injection would allow  the precipitators  to
perform as well as they would with  high sulfur coal.
                                      199

-------
       The utility had very good results when burning high sulfur coal in
 boiler "A".   One specific group of tests conducted in 1974, by the utility,
 with coal that had an average sulfur content of 3.94% and an average ash
 content of 20.75%, yielded an outlet grain loading of 0-011 gr/scf for
 precipitator "A".  Based on this and other data, it was decided that the
 precipitator manufacturer should pursue 863 flue gas conditioning as a final
 solution.

      The precipitator manufacturer purchased 863 flue gas conditioning
equipment to condition the fly ash going to both "A" and "B" precipitators.
This was an S02 source system consisting of a liquid 802 storage tank, liquid
S02 vaporizer, air filters, fans, SCR controlled air heaters, 802/803 catalytic
converters and injection probes.  Process instrumentation provided failsafe
operation and automatic adjustment of 803 production in response to boiler load.
The system was designed to inject 40 PPM of 803 into both flue gas streams of
110,000 ACFM at 30QOF.

TEST RESULTS WITH S03 FLUE GAS CONDITIONING

      In October 1979, the 803 flue gas conditioning system was installed and
operational.  The same quality low sulfur coal was being fired as when the
proprietary chemical gas conditioning system was being tested.  The utility
had agreed that the outlet option of 0.02 gr/scf would be sufficient in lieu
of a precipitator efficiency test.  Initially there was a seven-day optimization
period while injecting 803 prior to testing.  Improved electrical readings
were observed during this time.  (See Table 5).  After, this waiting period,
outlet grain loading tests were conducted on "A" precipitator.  The first
three tests surpassed the guarantee, averaging 0.0157 gr/scf.  (See Table 4).
After these tests were completed "B" precipitator was tested and also surpassed
the 0.02 gr/scf limit.

      Not only did the 803 flue gas conditioning system enable the precipitator
to meet design specifications, it also allowed the utility to support and
maintain a system with a low operating cost.  Based on an injection rate of
20 PPM, the total operating cost for both Units "A" and "B" was only $2,400/month.

CONCLUSION

      The final decision to install an 803 flue gas conditioning system was a
mutual agreement reached by both the precipitator manufacturer and the utility.
Thousands of dollars could have been saved if high resistivity had been
recognized initially as the problem with "A" and "B" precipitators.  Tests conducted
in 1974 proved that the burning of high sulfur coal enabled the precipitators  to
meet design specifications.

      Hopefully this case study will enable precipitator manufacturers and
 the electric utilities to apply this information to the design of cold-side
 electrostatic precipitators in the future.  The feeling for many years was
 that if you make them big enough they will work.  This is not always true as
 shown in this case.  After evaluating all possible solutions, one must agree
 that 803 flue gas conditioning is a reliable and cost efficient method in
                                     200

-------
enabling cold-side electrostatic precipitators to meet federal  particulate
emission standards while collecting lox* sulfur coal fly ash.
Table 1   DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS  "A" & "B"
  Process

  Suspended Material

  Fuel

  Gas Source

  Gas Volume

  Gas Temperature

  Gas Moisture

  Pressure

  Fuel  Specifications:

        Ash

        Sulfur

  Guaranteed  Efficiency

  Outlet  Option

  Surface Collecting Area
Steam Generation

Fly Ash and Fume

Coal (Eastern Bituminous)

Boilers (Steam Generators A & B)

110,000 ACFM (Each)

325 to 350°F

4 to 5% By Weight as Fired

Negative



25%

1%

99.8%

0.02 Gr/SCF

600-f SCA  (Each)
                                      201

-------
Table  3   PRECIPITATOR TEST RESULTS  USING PROPRIETARY CHEMICAL
          CONDITIONING ON  PRECIPITATOR "A" (1978)
          (TESTS  CONDUCTED BY INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT)
PROPRIETARY

TEST NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

DATE
8/10
8/10
8/10
8/11
8/11
8/14
8/14
8/15
8/15
8/15
8/16
8/16
8/16
8/17
8/17
8/17
8/18
8/18
8/18
8/21
8/21
8/21
8/22
8/22
8/23
8/23
8/23
8/24
8/24
8/24
STEAM FLOW
(103 LBS/HR)
180
182
185
181
185
162
171
171
170
174
176
182
180
178
179
180
183
185
187
175
177
178
163
172
168
166
173
161
166
166
Oo
£.
3.5
3.5
3.7
3.6
3.8
3.2
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.6
3.6
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
4.0
3.1
3.8
3.7
3.8
3.1
3.7
3.6
3.6
CHEMICAL
(GPT)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
                                                             EMISSION RATE
                                                               (GR/SCF)

                                                               0.33
                                                               0.31
                                                               0.39
                                                               0.33
                                                               0.34
                                                               0.31
                                                               0.28
                                                               0.32
                                                               0.27
                                                               0.31
                                                               0.33
                                                               0.25
                                                               0.31
                                                               0.38
                                                               0.37
                                                               0.36
                                                               0.40
                                                               0.28
                                                               0.27
                                                               0.40
                                                               0.27
                                                               0.35
                                                               0.18
                                                               0.26
                                                               0.24
                                                               0.24
                                                               0.27
                                                               0.29
                                                               0.28
                                                               0.25
Note:  Outlet Option for Contract Design Guarantee was 0.02 Gr/SCF
                                   202

-------
   Figure 1. Typical Schematic of Gas Flow For Units "A" & "B"
                                 TABLE 2
 Precipitator "A" Test Results, Acceptance Tests M975) Without SO3 Conditioning
                (Tests Conducted by Precipitatoi Manufacturer)

Test
No.
j
2
3
4
5
6
Inlet
Loading
(Gr/SCF)
2.85
5.05
5.20
4.52
4.67
4.39
Outlet
Loading
(Gr/SCF)
0.212
0.277
0.269
0.250
0.186
--

to
CM/SEC
2.199
2.450
2.507
2.531
2.728


Efficiency
<%)
92.56
94.51
94.83
94.47
96.02

Gas
Volume
(ACFM @ Outlet)
125,100
97,000
97,700
107,600
98,800
n^ f\r\f\

Temperature
(°F Outlet)
288
276
275
279
287
077
  7
  8
  9
 10
 11
3.84
4.88
4.82
4.97
0.216
0.173
0.231
0.225
0.171
2.549
2.622
2.583
2.593
2.636
95.08*
95.49
95.27
95.33
95.56
97,900
90,600
91,800
99,100
96,400
267
270
268
276
•Based on Test 6 Inlet, Test 7 Outlet, Standard Conditions 70°F, 29.92" Hg.

Note- Guaranteed Design Efficiency was 99.8%.
Note: Tests 1 And 8 Were Recorded With The Old "A" Precipitator On Line.

                           Typical Coal Analysis
                      Proximate Analysis as Received

                                Moisture, %   3.45
                       Heating Value, BTU/Lb  10,698
                                    Ash, %  23.13
                                  Sulfur, %   1.04
                                           203

-------
Table 4   PRECIPITATOR TEST RESULTS USING S03 CONDITIONING ON
          PRECIPITATOR "A" (1979)
          (TESTS CONDUCTED BY PRECIPITATOR MANUFACTURER)
TEST NO.

Location

% Moisture

% Oxygen

% C02

Gas Temperature  (°F)

Gas Volume  (ACFM)

Emission Rate  (Lbs/MMBTU)

Gr/SCF
Outlet
5.7
5.0
1A.5
300°F
85,710
0.0147
0.0186
Outlet
5.2
5.0
14.5
300°F
85,621
0.0112
0.0140
Outlet
7.2
5.0
14.5
300°F
85,981
0.0117
0.0145
Note:   Outlet Option for Contract Design Guarantee was 0.02 Gr/SCF

Note:   1.  Average Outlet Grain Loading from New "A" Precipitator
            with S03 Conditioning                       0.0157 Gr/SCF

        2.  Average Inlet Grain Loading into New "A"
            Precipitator with Old "A" Off               4.81 Gr/SCF
        3.  Estimated Efficiency Based on Inlet
            Assumptions

        A.  Migration Velocity Based on Above Data
                    99.9967%

                     8.74 Cm/Sec.
                           TYPICAL COAL ANALYSIS
                       Proximate Analysis as Received
           Moisture, % ...

Heating Value, BTU/Lb  . .  .
 5.51

10,613

  204
   Ash, %

Sulfur, %
23.28

 1.20

-------
Table 5   ELECTRICAL READINGS OF PRECIPITATOR "A" WITH AND WITHOUT
          S03 INJECTION WHILE BURNING LOW SULFUR COAL
                 1.  WITH S03 INJECTION,  10/19/79
                    DC-KVOLTS   AC-VOLTS
SPKS
AC-AMPS   DC-MA
Fields A
B
C
D
E
•p
45
55
55
50
55

290
290
300
380
400
v-; oi A i
30
40-50
0-20
0-20
0-20

25
20
25
60
85

100
75
100
380
560

                              S03 Injection Rate - 23  PPM
                                    Opacity  -   5-7%
                 2.  WITHOUT S03 INJECTION, 11/2/79
                     DC-KVOLTS   AC-VOLTS    SPKS   AC-AMPS    DC-MA,
Fields A
B
C
D
E
t?
43
48
47
45
47
230
200
220
250
260
	 Field
20
40
20
30
20
Trioped Off
10
10
10
15
26
50
10
10
50
120
                               503 Injection Rate  -  0 PPM
                                 Stack Opacity  -   25-30%
                                    205

-------
                ENHANCED PRECIPITATOR COLLECTION EFFICIENCIES
                      THROUGH RESISTIVITY MODIFICATION

                     By:  Dennis F.  Mahoney
                          Apollo Technologies Inc.
                          Whippany,  New Jersey   07981

                                  ABSTRACT

     High resistivity process dusts  and fly ashes from low sulfur coal may be
modified by chemical treatment to improve cold-side precipitator performance.
A new series of additives which are  effective in lowering resistivity is
described.  The additives are non-corrosive and of neutral pH.  Laboratory
resistivity test results are presented to show that treatment is insensitive
to ash composition or coal variations.  Reductions from lO^-lO12 ohm-cm to
<108 ohm-cm have been achieved.  Field results on a pilot precipitator and a
utility boiler show power and opacity improvements.
                               INTRODUCTION

     It is well known that ash from low sulfur coals presents collection
problems for electrostatic precipitators (ESP's).  This is especially true
for those that were designed for high sulfur coal or those that are in poor
mechanical condition.  The reason for these collection difficulties is also
well known: ESP's are most effective in collecting fly ash or other particles
with resistivity values of about 10" ohm-cm.  Fly ash resistivity values
are typically higher than this at cold-side temperatures; however, if suffi-
cient sulfur is present in the coal, some of it will be oxidized during
combustion to give 803 which may then condense on the fly ash surface to
give a conductive film of sulfuric acid.  Without this conductive film the
resistivity will be a function of the particle composition and temperature.
The resistivity will be determined by the pathway giving the lowest value.
Above 400°F or in dry air the water layer is desorbed and the bulk resistiv-
ity values are measured.  Bulk resistivity is inversely proportional to
temperature while the surface resistivity is determined by adsorption mech-
anisms which are directly proportional to temperature.  In general, fly ash
bulk resistivities are too high for effective collection at cold-side ESP
temperatures of 275-375°F, and with low sulfur coals the S03 and moisture
levels are too low to reliably condition the ash at these temperatures.

     In this paper the degradation mechanisms and some of the cures for
ESP's collecting high resistivity fly ash will be briefly reviewed.  The
main portion of the paper will then report on new flue gas conditioners
(FGC's) which are designed to overcome some of these difficulties.

                   EFFECT OF RESISTIVITY ON ESP OPERATION

     Ash particle charging and the subsequent collection are determined by a
number of factors including field strength, particle size and dielectric
constant.  Particle resistivity affects the collection process indirectly; as
ash is collected a layer builds up on the plates, increasing the resistance
                                     206

-------
across the precipitator.  This  lowers  the  voltage  and  in  turn  the  collection
efficiency.

     The poor charge transfer of  high  resistivity  ash  also makes it more
difficult to rap from the plates.   Consequently,  the clean plate powers seen
when a unit comes back  from  an  outage  or after  an  air  sweep  will deteriorate
with time.  Table 1 shows the timewise degradation of  an  electric  utility ESP
collecting ash from low sulfur  coal.

                   Table 1.  EFFECT OF TIME ON  ESP POWERS*

          Days After Airsweep               Precipitator Powers (KVA)

                   0                                 179
                   1                                 174
                   2                                 148
                   3                                 160
                   4                                 134
                   5                                   79
           *  Operating temperature is approx.  275°F.   Coal  supply
             is  1.0-1.2% sulfur.

     A number of  different approaches have been used to  counteract  the
 effects  of high resistivity ash.   These include larger ESP's,  hot-side
 ESP's, S03 injection and flue gas conditioning.

     Increasing ESP size suffers  from the obvious disadvantage of increasing
 construction costs.  For example, a recent article (1) in  the  Journal of  the
 Air  Pollution Control Association estimated that ESP construction costs were
 $35/kW for high sulfur coal and  $85/kW for low sulfur coal.  This difference
 is due to  the greater collection  area and higher field strengths specified
 by ESP manufacturers for high resistivity ash.

     Another mechanical alternative is the hot-side precipitator.   By
 positioning  the ESP before the air heater, these are designed  to take ad-
 vantage  of the  lower bulk resistivity in the 500-700° region.   Unfortun-
 ately, a number of the low sulfur coals burned also have high  bulk
 resistivities resulting in a similar problem.

     One alternate approach to mechanical modifications  is to  lower the ash
 resistivity  to  match it to the particular ESP.  As mentioned above  this can
 be done  with S03, NH3 or other flue gas conditioners.  Sulfuric acid has  a
 higher dew point  than water, but  its performance is also limited.   It  is  re-
 ported  (2) to be  most effective on basic ashes and to lose its effectiveness
 as the temperature increases.  Other FGC additives are usually solutions
 which spray  dry or vaporize in the gas stream.  A well known example of
 these is Apollo's LPA-40®.  FGC's are commonly molten salts which  prevent
 rapper reentrainment or lower resistivity.  As with sulfuric acid  they may  be
 ash  specific or react with the ash to be deactivated.
                                      207

-------
                                  RESULTS

     In trying to develop an FGC additive to avoid these problems, a number
of factors were considered including
        a liquid material for easy handling
        neutral pH to prevent corrosion or injury
     •  low feed rates for economy and ease of injection
        ash independence to minimize the effects of coal changes
        chemically inert to prevent pluggage or deactivation.
The results obtained can be understood in terms of physical properties, fri-
ability and resistivity lowering.

Physical Properties

     The additives discussed here are similar to previous FGC's in that they
are water based.  They are also near neutral in pH.  Ash reactive chemicals
are not present or are in relatively low concentrations resulting in less
interaction with the ash.

Deposit Friability

     Under ideal conditions FGC's are sprayed into the gas stream evenly at
low levels of 0.1-1% of the ESP ash loading.  In practice, however, air
heaters, cold spots and internal ductwork often provide sites where the
additive and ash can collect together to give deposits which may disrupt or
block the gas flow.  If the two then react together or sinter, the deposit
may become hard enough to resist easy removal.  This behavior is most ex-
pected with high salt additives and reactive ashes.

     With the new materials hard buildups do not occur.  Laboratory
simulations were made by mixing up to 5-10% of additives with ash and heating
at 400°F for 4-16 hours.  The result was a dry friable ash.  In field trials
a worst case situation was simulated by placing a cooled deposit probe di-
rectly in front of an FGC injection nozzle.  This resulted in a moist
deposit buildup which rapidly eroded after the FGC was shut off.  By con-
trast a standard high salt FGC had a hard, sintered deposit which could only
be removed with great difficulty.

Resistivity Modification

     Even fly ashes with different compositions typically have very similar
bulk resistivities.  Figure 1 shows the dry air resistivity curves for two
bituminous and one lignitic ash.  Table 2 gives their elemental analyses.
                                      208

-------
   13
E 12
o
    11
110
O
     8
         200     250    300   350 400     500

                        Temperature, (° F)
600
 Figure 1.  Resistivity Of Various Fly Ashes As A Function Of Temperature

            In Dry Air.  A And C Are Bituminous Ashes And B Is Lignitic.

            Analyses Are In Table 2.
                              209

-------
                       TABLE 2.   FLY ASH COMPOSITION

      Oxide.  %                A                B
Si02
A1203
Fe20i!
CaO
MgO
Na20
45.9
21,2
11.2
2.2
0.5
0.3
32.3
12.4
5.6
12.4
6.3
4.2
50.6
24,4
6,4
2,1
0,8
1.3
      Ashes  A and C  are  bituminous  while  B  is  lignitic.   The most noticeable
 difference  in this  composition  is  the  higher  calcium oxide leyel in B,  but
 the iron levels  also  vary.

      The surface resistivities  of  these  ashes vary  considerably as  can  be
 seen by Figure 2.   Here the water  is much  more  strongly  adsorbed onto ash B,
 resulting in greater  resistivity reductions.  This  is more representative of
 actual  field conditions where flue gas moisture  is  5^10%,

      Conventional flue  gas conditioners  such  as  ammonium sulfate lower  these
 resistivity values.   Typically, 0,5% by  weight on the ash lowers the resis-
 tivity  by about  one half order  of  magnitude,

      Our first efforts  to develop  liquid modifiers  yielded thermally unstable
 materials which  were  very effective at low temperatures  but  actually in-
 creased the resistivity at ESP  temperatures.  Figure 3 illustrates  the  effect
 of  one  of these  formulations on ash A.   Comparison  of the  curves at  different
 moisture levels  shows that the additive  is much more effective  than  water  at
 low temperatures, but that as the  temperature increases  the  additive effec-
 tiveness drops off, and resistivity actually  rises  above  the water
 conditioned values.   The shaded areas in Figure 3 indicate regions  in a nor-
 mal ESP temperature range where resistivity reductions (T<300°F)  and
 increases (T>300°F) would be seen.

      This problem was overcome and treatment rates  greatly reduced by
 reformulation.   The curves in Figure 4 show the results of treating  ash B.
 The shaded  region between the untreated curves is bounded  by the operating
 temperatures and moisture levels found in a typical cold^side ESP.   Treated
 resistivity over this temperature range is low and  essentially  constant,
 with  performance only beginning to drop off above 350-400°F.  Lower  treat-
 ment  levels of less than 1% give similar curves but displaced slightly  up-
 ward.  Higher  treatment values give off-scale resistivities.

      In actual practice  it may not be desirable to  lower resistivity by such
 a large amount.  Figure  5 illustrates the effect of a lower activity addi-
 tive on two different fly ashes.  Note that ash C is modified considerably
over all ESP operating temperatures but that ash B,  which  has a  lower resis-
 tivity,  is only improved slightly in a narrower range.  With sufficient
experience these  effects can be predicted by the ash elemental analysis and


                                      210

-------
   13
E 12
o
   11
110

O
    8
        200     250    300   350  400     500


                      Temperature, (°F)



           Figure  2. Effect Of Surface Conditioning By
                     20% H20 In Air On Resistivity
600
                           211

-------
13 L
 8
     200
                                         Treated (5%)
250   300  350 400     500   600
     Temperature, (°F)
      Figure 3.  Effect Of Additive X On Ash Resistivity
                See Discussion In Text.
                        212

-------
13 -
                        3.1% Additive Y
                            (10% H2O)
      200     250    300  350  400     500   600
                     Temperature, (° F)
         Figure 4.  Effect Of Additive Y At 1% On Ash
                   Resistivity As A Function Of Temperature
                   1.  Untreated, 5% H20; 2, Untreated,
                   10% H20; 3. 1% Additive Y; 10% H20
                          213

-------
   13
E 12
o
    11
110
O
     8
 3. Ash B
  Treated
         200     250    300  350 400     500
                       Temperature, (°F)
600
              Figure 5.  Effect Of Additive Z On Differing
                         Fly Ashes Using 10% H20 Atmosphere
                         Curve 1 - Ash C, Untreated;
                         Curve 2 - Ash B, Untreated;
                         Curve 3 - Ash C, treated
                                214

-------
untreated resistivity curves.

Actual Precipitator Studies

     Effects on an actual ESP bear  out  the  resistivity  reductions seen in
the laboratory.  Table 3 shows  the  effects  on  powers  and  opacities on a pilot
ESP derated with high resistivity ash.   Table  4  shows similar results on an
actual field unit.

                       TABLE 3.  PILOT  PLANT RESULTS*
Untreated
ESP Voltage (kV)
• inlet
• outlet
Opacity
21
24
18
Treated
30
36
8
Percent Change
+42
+50
-55
     * 270-310°F operating  temperature,  ash C

                        TABLE  4.   FIELD ESP  RESULTS
                        Untreated        Treated        Percent  Change
   ESP Powers  (kVA)
         •  inlet             45             57               +27
         •  outlet	15	19	+27

 In the field case  testing  was  carried out at a  time  when  ESP  powers were not
 the  limiting factor  in  collection efficiency; hence, the  increase  in powers
 did  not  materially lower opacity.

                                 CONCLUSION

     Ash resistivity can be an important factor in lowering ESP collection
 efficiency.  The additives described here are independent of  ash composition
 and  can  yield  varying treated  resistivity values depending on the  additive
 chosen and amount  used. The laboratory results have been substantiated in
 pilot plant and field precipitators.

     A patent  on this new  process is being applied for and further results
 and  discussion will  be  forthcoming.

                                  ENDNOTES

 1.   Komanoff,  C.   Pollution Control  Improvements in  Coal  Fired Electric
     Generating Plants:  What They Accomplish, What They Cost.   JAPCA.   30  (9)
     p. 1051 (1980).

 2.   Oglesby  S. et al.  A  Manual of  Electrostatic Precipitator Technology,
     Part I: Fundamentals.   1970.   PP 19, 173.   Report No. APTD-0610  (Avail.
     NTIS).
                                      215

-------
              DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW SULFUR TYPE ASH CONDITIONING

               By:  Robert H. Gaunt, Senior Research Engineer
                   Air Correction Division/UOP, Inc.
                   Norwalk, Connecticut  06856

                                  ABSTRACT

     Various types of chemical ash conditioning agents are used to alter fly-
ash resistivity, and thereby improve electrostatic precipitator performance.
Air Correction Division, UOP, Inc. has had experience with many chemicals and
processes on a pilot and full scale basis.  Sulfuric acid conditioning has
advantages over other sulfur conditioning systems in availability, cost of
chemicals, ease of handling, process control,  and relative lack of corrosion
problems.  In the past, operating costs (power consumption) of sulfuric acid
systems has not been particularly attractive in large power plants.   ACD/UOP
has developed a new system that utilizes the advantages of sulfuric  acid while
reducing the capital and operating costs to competitive levels with  other
systems.  The new process utilizes existing energy in the compressed and
heated plant combustion air.  A prototype unit at a 46 MW station improved
precipitator collection efficiency to 99.8% from 85.0% at an operating cost
of $40.00 per day.
                                INTRODUCTION

     As emission standards have become more stringent over the past decade,
design and operation of pollution control equipment has become more and more
critical.  This particularly applies to the sizing and design of electrostatic
precipitators (ESP's) for fossil fueled power plants.

     One of the basic parameters that effects ESP performance is the resisti-
vity of the flyash.  ESP's operating on highly resistive flyash (>10^^ ohm-cm)
(see figure 1) are faced with problems of ash build up on electrodes, and poor
electrical operating characteristics such as low voltage-current,  back corona,
and early sparking. (1)  (see figure 2)  These problems can,  to some extent,
be dealt with by specific ESP designs for highly resistive ash.  However, this
increases the size and complexity of an ESP and adds considerably to the cost.

     The resistivity of the ash is dependent on a number of factors which can
be altered or used advantageously.  One is temperature.  Typical resistivity
temperature curves are shown in figure 1.  The conventional ESP is placed
after the air preheater which frequently is near the point of highest ash
resistivity.   Moving the ESP to the hot side of the preheater overcomes this
problem, but adds to the ESP size since greater gas volume must be handled,
and structures are more complex to deal with higher temperatures.   Hot side
ESP's are not a cure all since they too can have resistivity problems,
particularly with low sodium coals.

     A second approach to processing with highly resistive ash is to chemical-
ly alter the flyash and thereby change the resistivity to a more favorable
range.   Chemical conditioning agents can be introduced in the power plant's
                                      216

-------
process stream in several places.   The  agent  can  be  added  to  the  coal   iniect-
ed in the combustion zone, or  injected  in  the flue gas  stream.  The  first  two
locations may create slagging  problems  in  the boiler.   Flue gas injection
generally involves more equipment,  but  has fewer  operational  difficulties.'

     The chemicals typically added  to alter resistivity for cold  side  ESP's
are sulfur compounds, such as,  sulfur-trioxide (S03), as well as  ammonia (NH4),
water, and other proprietary chemicals.  Sodium compounds  are generally used
to condition hot side ESP's.   Air Correction's experience  with cold  side con-
ditioning is the subject of this report.

                                ASH  CONDITIONING

     Two mechanisms are involved in passing an electric charge thru  flyash.
Volume conductivity is dominant at  temperatures above 450°F.  (2)  As the
temperature increases, the resistivity  of  the ash particle drops  allowing
passage of an electric current thru the body  of the  particle.  As the  tempera-
ture falls below 350°F, surface conductivity  becomes dominant. In this process
the charge is carried by the adsorbed chemical impurities  on  the  surface of
the particle rather than thru  the particle.   Since this temperature break  is
also at the upper range of cold side ESP application, most cold side condition-
ing agents are adsorbed by the flyash and  act by  improving surface conductivi-
ty-

     In the 1960's it was found that the addition of sulfates (S04) greatly
increased the conductivity of  flyash. This happens naturally when most coal is
burned.  Sulfur is usually present  in all  coal to some  degree.  When burning
it forms sulfur dioxide (S02)  and a few percent of sulfur  trioxide (803).  (2)
The 863 in combination with the water in the  flue gas acts as a natural condi-
tioning agent with most flyash. As power  plants  began  to  burn low sulfur  coal
 (under 1.5% to 1.0%) to meet S02 emission  requirements,  the amount of  803 was
not enough to keep the ash resistivity  in  a reasonable  range  for  good  opera-
tion of ESP's.  This resulted  in increased particulate  emissions  as  the sulfur
emissions fell.

                               ACD/UOP EXPERIENCE

     Interest in ash conditioning began to develop with the need  to burn lower
sulfur coals.  ACD first tried the  obvious step of injecting  803  in  a  flue gas
stream on an experimental basis.  This  produced improvement in ESP operation
and also pointed out the difficulties in handling S03.   The test  system used
stabilized 803 liquid, heated  to a  vapor,  and injected  it  in  the  flue  duct.
However, when cooled below 90°F, S03 starts to solidify in storage tanks,
pumps, heat exchangers, pipes,  etc.  Heating  it as a solid frequently  causes
it to sublime in which case, the gas may be trapped  by  the solid  and under
high pressure.  As a gas it reacts  extremely  exothermically with  water.  With
water it forms fuming sulfuric acid which  is  extremely  corrosive  until suffi-
cient dilution occurs.  The S03 studies were  not  carried past the experimental
stage.
     Ammonia was tried and  found  to  produce improvement  in ESP  operation
 few special instances.  Water was also  tried but  was  found to be ineffective
in a
                                       217

-------
except in very large amounts or at very low flue gas temperatures.  Sulfur
trioxide was almost always effective, but a more practical way to introduce
it in the flue gas was required.

     One novel method tried was to pass a slip stream of flue gas through a
catalyst bed to increase the SO^ content, and then pass it back into the flue
gas.  Ash plugging problems were encountered and operation on extremely low
sulfur coal was not feasible.  Another method was to take liquid S02, heat it
to a vapor, pass it over a catalyst bed to convert a large quantity to 803,
and inject it into the flue gas.  While this looked promising, a third method
looked even better.  This was to vaporize liquid sulfuric acid (H2S04) and
thermally dissociate a portion of the vapor to 803 and water (H2S04*H20 + 863)
The temperature required to vaporize the acid was around 450°F to 500°F.
Then the vapor was passed over a superheater to raise the temperature to
around 800°F to 900 F.  This has the advantage of using sulfuric acid as a
conditioning agent.  It is readily available, comparitively cheap, and fairly
safe to handle.  As a common industrial reagent, there is a large amount of
technical experience on its handling, storage, transport, and use.  With the
93% (66°Baume) concentration used, serious corrosivity exists only when
changing state from a liquid to a gas or the converse.  Further work proved
that acid dissociation is not required, and the superheater could be eliminat-
ed.

     The use of sulfuric acid vapor as a conditioning agent produces the same
effect as conditioning with 803 and has some handling and process advantages.
When 803 i-s injected into a flue gas stream, it immediately reacts with the
moisture in the gas stream to form H2S04, which is adsorbed on the flyash.
Injecting H2S04 to start with has the identical effect on the ash.  It has
been found that the lances and nozzles used to inject 803 must be kept at
800°F or higher to keep the 803 from immediately combining with the moisture
at the nozzle and thereby corroding it quickly away.   In contrast, the nozzles
and lances used to inject sulfuric acid vapor need only be kept above the
vapor dew point, generally under 400°F.  This can be accomplished with the
heat of the vapor with short runs that are well insulated.  Heat tracing is
not required.  A flow diagram of this conditioning system is shown in figure
3.  This system was installed at Cameo Station, Public Service Company of
Colorado in 1968, and resulted in the first utility order for a commercial
ash conditioning unit in the United States.

     At this point it would be good to reexamine sulfur emissions and the
operation of sulfur conditioning systems.  At first glance, it appears that
with sulfur conditioning, sulfur is being added to replace that reduced by
burning low sulfur coal.  This is not the case since most sulfur from coal
combustion is emitted in the form of 802> which is released to atmosphere.
Large percentages of 803 or H2S04 are absorbed on the flyash and collected by
the ESP.  This is confirmed in EPA Report, EPA-600/7-79-104a.  The acidity of
the ash increases but not greater than that from burning high sulfur coal.

     For determining the conditioning feed rate two methods are generally
used.   Sampling the stack gas and operating at a rate just below that where
sulfur emissions begin to increase is possible.  The second is considerably
less difficult.  Assuming the plant has been operating without conditioning,

                                      218

-------
injection is initiated at a low rate,and slowly increased over a period of at
least 24 hours.  The ESP voltage-current readings will increase as the condi-
tioning rate increases up to the point of acid carry over.  The ESP readings
then stabilize or fall off slightly and a blueish tint to the plume may be
noticiable.  The optimum conditioning rate  is slightly below this point.  It
should be noted that it may take 18 to 24 hours for the full effect of condi-
tioning to take place.

     It has been ACD's experience  that 12 to 20 ppm of acid is all that is
required to condition the ash.  Most of our units are sized for 30 ppm
maximum and some for 45 ppm for unusual conditions or customers request. This
extra capacity has never been required and  is a margin of safety.  To date no
corrosion problems have occurred to the flue ducts or ESP internals due to
the ash conditioning.
                           ACD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

     The early work by ACD in sulfuric acid conditioning resulted in ACD's
patented sulfuric acid vaporizing system.  As is seen in figure 3, clean air
is compressed to around 2 psig by a blower; the air is heated to 485°F by an
electric air heater and mixed with a metered amount of acid in a glass lined
packed column.  The acid is pumped from a day tank and injected into the
vaporizer by a metering pump.  All equipment is mounted on a single skid near
the flue duct.  From the vaporizer the acid vapor is carried in a short
length of glassed steel pipe to the stainless steel injection lances where it
is dispersed in the flue gas.

     This system has been developed to be quite reliable.  Changes from early
units have simplified controls and improved materials to withstand system
upset conditions without damage.  These units are most attractive to smaller
plants (see table 1).  Their performance is quite good.  The main draw back
is their relatively high operating cost due to electric power consumption
heating the process air.

     ACD recognized the operating cost problem and set out to develop a
system that would utilize sulfuric acid with its advantages, but do so in a
more economical manner.  The first approach was that of direct spray into the
flue duct.   Acoustic atomizing nozzles were used to produce a very fine "fog"
of atomized liquid sulfuric acid.  This was by far the simplist and cheapest
approach.  In still air these nozzles worked quite well, however, after tests
in three locations, it was determined that the acid was not dispersing
properly in the flue ducts and was in fact wetting streams of flyash that
passed near the nozzles.  This caused the locally damp ash to adhere and
build up on the first surface it came in contact with.  Usually, this would
be turning vanes or the perforated plate across the face of the ESP.  No
practical way to prevent this was found and work on the direct spray approach
was suspended.

     The next step was to try to maintain the lance dispersion method of the
vaporizer system with the efficiency of the direct spray approach.  It was
decided to try spraying the acid in a slip stream of hot air or gas in a

                                      219

-------
 controlled manner so that the acid would vaporize and  could be  Injected into
 the  flue  duct as a vapor.  The  initial step was  to  develop a  spray  chamber to
 vaporize  the acid.  This was done with a laboratory model using air and water.
 One  requirement was to vaporize the acid completely before it came  in  contact
 with any  surface so as to eliminate corrosion problems.  A cylinderical
 chamber was devised with the air flow in and out of tangential  openings and
r.the  acid  sprayed down the center axis from one end.  (see figure 4).   After
 a working model was developed in the lab, a chamber was made  up to  try with
 acid.  This project was done at a power plant with  one of our vaporizer
 conditioning units so the acid  vapor could be fed into the flue duct and
 collected by their ESP.  The vapor system rate was  turned down  accordingly
 when the  chamber was in operation.  The hot air  for the chamber was taken
 from the  hot air side of the Eundstrom type air preheater.  The  amount  of air
 is about  14-15 scfm per megawatt of power produced.  This is  below  the normal
 leakage rate associated with a Eundstrom air heater.  Using this test setup,
 exact chamber, nozzle, and internal flow device  dimensions were developed  for
 the  chamber; and air flow, temperature, and acid flow  rate limits were
 developed.

      When the basic spray chamber was perfected  the next step was to incorpo-
 rate it in an operating system.  A prototype system was built and installed
 at the same plant so that the new system could be tested with the vaporizer
 system as back up and as a comparison.  This new system consists of a  control
 and  metering pump skid, two chambers, two lances, and  the associated air and
 acid piping.  It is shown in figure 5.  This system was operated by both ACD/
 UOP  and power plant personnel to discover any operational bugs  and  correct
 them prior to offering the system as part of our product line.   Also,  life
 expectancy of the components could be determined and improved if necessary.
 The  only probleHis which appeared were in the area of automating  the  shut  down
 procedure to prevent acid from  sitting stagnent  in  the hot lines near  the
 spray nozzle.  This was accomplished with an automatic air purge.

      The  new process is called  the SAAC System (Sulfuric Acid Ash Condition-
 ing) .  It avoids several limitations of the vaporizer  column.   It can  handle
 dirty process air.  The flow thru the chamber is clear so most  particulate
 is carried along with the air.  This is not the  case with a packed  vaporizer
 column which must have filtered air and quite clean acid.  The  chamber can
 operate over a wide temperature range (500°F to  750°F),where  the vaporizer
 glass and teflon must be closely held between 475°F to 500°F  for proper
 operation.  No expensive materials are required  for the chamber.  The
 tangential air flow keeps the acid out of contact with the chamber  until it
 is vaporized.  The only exotic  material used is  the acoustic spray nozzle
 which is  made out of tantalum.  This is required since it is  at a liquid/
 gaseous interface where extreme corrosion occurs.

      In operation the SAAC system avoids the operational expense of our
 previous  system.  Hot air is supplied by the existing  plant air heater.  In
 some cases a start-up trim heater may be recommended depending  on operating
 :conditions.  The pressure differential between the  air heater outlet and in-
 let  to the ESP produced by the  plant combustion  air blowers is  sufficient  for
 the  process so no blower is required.  The compressed  air for the nozzles  is
 one  cfm per nozzle.

                                     220

-------
     The  sulfuric acid  is  kept as an easily handled ambient  liquid up until
mixing with hot air.  This is done adjacent to the duct work to  keep the
vapor piping as short as possible.  The  control and metering pump skid can be
mounted remotely at a convenient location.

     In summary, ash conditioning with sulfur compounds is the most success-
ful method of lowering  the resistivity of high resistivity ash to a range
needed for good electrostatic precipitator operation.  Air Correction Division
of UOP  (ACD/UOP) has been  a leader in researching this field and led the
field  in  early pilot work.  ACD/UOP has  offered a reliable,  effective ash
conditioning system over the past decade.  Now ACD/UOP has developed a new
sulfur conditioning process that retains the advantages of the old system
and has greatly lowered operating costs  associated with sulfur conditioning.
                                   REFERENCES

 1.   White, H.J.   Resistivity Problems  in Electrostatic Precipitators, APCA,
     Vol 24, No. 4,  April 1974.

 2.   Oglesley, S.  Jr.  and Nichols,  G.B.   Electrostatic Precipitation.  New
     York, N.Y., Marcel Dekker, Inc.   1978.
                                 TABLE 1
   UTILITY
                         UNIT
                                 MW
                                        ACFM
                                                TEMP
                                                              EFFICIENCIES (%)
                        WITHOUT
                     CONDITIONING
              WITHOUT
           CONDITIONING
   Public Service Co. of
   Colorado - Cameo Station
44   221,300   280
                         50.0
                                       94.0
   General Motors Corp.      1&2
   Chevrolet Detroit-Forge   7&8
      150,000   350
      150,000   350
73.0
48.4
93.3
93.3
   Public  Service Co. of      2     46    261,000   315
   Colorado-Arapahoe Station  3     44    250,000   350
                         51.5
                         42.2
               97.5
               94.8
   Luzern Electric Div., UGI
   Corp.  Hunlock Creek Station 6
46    225,000  350
                         85.0
                                        99.8
   Pennsylvania Electric Co.   9
   Front Street Station       10
      270,000  400
      270,000  400
90.0
91.0
99.1
99.2
   Detroit Edison            23
   Pennsalt Plant            24
   Wyandotte, Michigan
                         90.1
                         87.4
               94.4
               93.0
                                        221

-------
  10'
   10V
                                 0.5-1 %
                                     1.5-2%
                                          -2.5 - 3%
     200     250     300     350     400      450


                  TEMPERATURE, °F



                     FIGURE 1


 RESISTIVITY OF FLYASH FOR VARIOUS SULFUR CONTENTS
    0.6
5
u
s
t-^"
z
z
o
8
    0.5
    0.4
    0.3
    0.2
                                               10
                                    SPARK
       ^=2.5 « 10
                                = 10"
     30    40    50    60
                             70
                                   80     90
            CORONA VOLTAGE, KILOVOLTS


                    FIGURE 2


  CORONA CURRENT-VOLTAGE DISTORTIONS CAUSED

BY DUST LAYERS ON GROUNDED PLATES	DC VOLTAGE
                                                       (1)
                           222

-------
   VENT
LEVEL
SENSOR
HI  & LO
LEVEL
GAGE -
                                    PULSATION
                                    DAMPER
      ACID FILL LINE FROM SUPPLY TANK
                       FILTER
                           METERING
                             PUMP
 DAY
TANK
(ACID)
^
                   BPJLE_R_SJGNAL
                   120~PsiG~ _
                   INS~T7~AiR~
                      CONTROL SYSTEM
                        PNEUMATIC
         ELECTRICAL
          CABINET
                    LOW
                FLOW SENSOR
          HEATER
         CONTROLS
            &
          Hit LO
           TEMPS.
          ALARMS -
           MISC.
         CONTROLS
          SIGNALS,
            ETC.
              S
              c
              R
            480V
             30
           FILTER
                        AIR
                      HEATER
                        480V
                        30
                            z
 CS PIPE
(HOT AIR)
                                       VAPORIZER
       FRESH AIR
                  TURBO
               COMPRESSOR
                                       DRAIN
                       LANCES
                                            'GLASSED
                                            TRANSFER PIPE
                                             (ACID VAPOR)
                                          EXPANSION JOINTS
                         FIGURE 3
       TYPICAL VAPORIZER SYSTEM FLOW DIAGRAM
                            223

-------
SAAC CHAMBER
HOT AIR
INLET
                                   ACOUSTIC
                                   ATOMIZING
                                   NOZZLE
                                   AClb
                                    fR
                                 FLUE
k
                FIGURE 4
      SAAC CHAMBER ARRANGEMENT
                   224

-------
               600 SCFM PER CHAMBER
          HOT
          AIR
          PIPE '
                                 ATOMIZING AIR LINE   80 TO 100 PSIQ
                                    —*	T]	* PLANT AIR
                                        FILTER    60 SCFH PER NOZZLE
                                           LIQUID ACID LINE
                                 LIQUID ACID
                                   LINE
                                             0-3 QAL/HR
                                             PER NOZZLE
LEVEL
GAGE j
    INLET  VENT
    J	t_
     ACID DAY
       TANK
                      FILTER  80 To 100
                               PLANT AIR  i—i
                          AIR PURGE LINE
        VENT

   CONSOLE
   MOUNTED
  EQUIPMENT
                                   I—(-O)   DUPLEX
                        FILTER SET
                                            PUMP
_EQUIPMENT    	-l
                           FIGURE 5
  TYPICAL SAAC SYSTEM FLOW DIAGRAM-2 CHAMBER
                               225

-------
           OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH FLUE GAS CONDITIONING  SYSTEMS
                        AT~ COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

                        By:  L. L. Weyers, R. E. Cook
                             Commonwealth Edison Company
                             Chicago,  Illinois   60690

                                   ABSTRACT

    The use of western  low sulfur coal,  to reduce sulfur oxide emissions,
has resulted in decreased electrostatic  precipitator collection
efficiencies.  In an effort to restore precipitator performance, a  flue  gas
conditioning program was established by  the company in  the  early seventies.

    This paper is a history of Commonwealth Edison Company's experience
with flue gas conditioning agents over the last eight years.  Extensive
testing of these systems has supplied valuable information  which is
presently being used as a basis in design of future plant additions to our
systems.
                                     TEXT

    The change to low sulfur western coals in the early seventies resulted
in unacceptable particulate emissions due to the high resistivity of the
fly ash.  This condition required that Edison either install additional
precipitator sections, new precipitators, or reduce the resistivity of the
fly ash by the addition of chemicals.  Each unit was examined individually
and two hot side precipitators and one cold side were installed for low
sulfur coal.  The remaining twelve units, which were scheduled to burn low
sulfur coal, had large enough precipitators to meet particulate limits if
the resistivity of the fly ash could be improved and the boiler operated at
design gas flow.

    Edison, after testing several proprietary chemicals and various SOg
injection systems, including a liquid sulfur trioxide system, decided that
the most cost effective and potentially most reliable system was the sulfur
burner type SO^ system.

    The experience gained from a pan-type sulfur burner installed on a 230
megawatt pulverized coal fired boiler at State Line Station in 1973
indicated a considerable reduction in particulate emissions could be
expected.  The precipitator efficiency increased from 84% to 97% when
feeding 50 ppm of 863 and the corona power input exhibited a great
improvement with 363 injection.  By reducing the sparking in the
precipitator,  the power input level was increased from 25 watts per 1,000
ACFM to 250 watts per 1,000 ACFM; a ten-fold increase.

    Operating experience with the pan-type burner, however, was not good.
The sulfur feed method was unreliable and required extensive operator
attention.  In addition, there was little turn-down capability of the


                                     226

-------
burner.  It was possible  to  increase the turn-down capability to five to
one.  However, because of  the  uncertainty of future coals for the stations,
it was felt that any  flue  gas  conditioning system must be automated,  simple
to operate, and have  a turn-down ratio of at least ten to one.

    Wahlco, Inc., had submitted a proposal for a sulfur burning type  flue
gas conditioning system.   Their system utilized a drip-type burner with  a
guaranteed ten to one turn-down ratio.  The flue gas conditioning system,
shown schematically in Figure  One,  was quite simple and had the advantage
of being compactly mounted on  a skid.   This was an important consideration
because previous experience  had shown  that the 803 source should be
located as close to the  injection probes as possible,  to minimize heat  loss
in  the piping system. In addition, their system, because of its
compactness, could be installed in a rather small area.

    A flue gas conditioning  system was ordered for State Line Unit Three in
1974, but due to commitments to the Illinois EPA and the City of Hammond
EPA, Edison was required  to  order flue gas conditioning equipment for
eleven other units, totaling approximately 3,000 megawatts before the first
system at State Line  could be  tested.   All of these units had to be
operational before June,  1976.

    As with any new system,  a  certain number of problems were expected.
The first to occur was the sulfur pumping system.  Liquid sulfur requires a
temperature range of  245°F to  310°F.  Below 245°F it solidifies,  and
above  310°F it becomes extremely viscous.  Many pump failures occurred
which were usually attributed  to the pump diaphragms  being ruptured  when
bringing  the  system on line.  These failures also occurred when the sulfur
in  the stand-by pump  was  allowed to solidify.  By changing to steam
jacketed  pumps instead of electrically heated, and adding additional  steam
tracing and insulation on the  pump piping and valves,  the problem was
corrected.

    The next  problem  that occurred was the failure rate of the  calrod air
heaters.  Even though Edison had specified an in-line  spare heater, the
failure rate  often resulted  in a burner being out-of-service for
replacement of the-'heater elements.  This problem was  corrected by
improving  the quality control  at the heater manufacturer's plant.

    The third problem did not  become apparent until after several months ^of
operation.  Some of the  injection probe insulation, which was covered by
fiberglass and epoxy, was being eroded by the fly ash  particles.   These
failures  occurred in  installations where the probes were experiencing high
 'as velocities because of their location in the duct-work.  Only a few
units had  this problem,  and  it was corrected by installing a steel liner
over  the  insulation.

    The original specification for the sulfur burner units called for a
capability of producing  at least 60 ppm of S03 with a  turn-down ratio of
ten to one.  The 60 ppm  was  based on precipitator test results with the
original  burner and Arch Mineral Coal.  An analysis of Arch Mineral and


                                     227

-------
NJ
N)
00
       Liquid
       Sulfur
      Storage
                            Liquid Sulfur
                             250-300°F
                         Ambient
                         Air In
                      Metering
                       Pump
Injection
 Probes
            l
Controlled to
 800-825°F
                                                      Sulfur
                                                      Burner
           Boiler Flue
                                    FLOW  DIAGRAM
                           FLUE  GAS  CONDITIONING  UNIT
                                        Figure 1
                             Converter
                                                                        Air/SOs—
                                                                      800-IIOO°F
                    \.       7 Conditioned
                         —*» Flue Gas To
                            s  Precipitator

-------
other coals utilized by Edison is shown in Table One.   When the Wahlco
System became operational,  precipitator tests indicated that less  than  20
ppm of S03 was the optimum  feed,  even on Arch Mineral  Coal with its
extremely high resistivity  (greater than 1013 ohm-cm).  The only
explanation for this change was the much more extensive injection  probe
system installed by Wahlco  which  resulted in better S03 distribution.

    As more sulfur burners  became operational at the various stations,  it
became apparent that some  low sulfur coals required very little S03  to
improve or optimize precipitator  performance.  The oversized burners,
therefore, aggravated  the  problem since operation at minimum sulfur  feed
rate often created a condition whereby the system would trip-out due to low
temperatures which indicated flame failure of the burner.

    The coals that need  little S03, such as Decker and Big Horn,
fortunately also have  a  very low ash content.  Therefore,  even if  the
precipitator was not at  optimum performance levels because of the  sulfur
burner being out-of-service, the  low inlet dust loadings resulted  in
acceptable particulate emissions.  Consequently, many of the sulfur  burners
were  left  in a "stand-by"  mode of operation when the stations were burning
Decker or  Big Horn coal.

    This problem was examined in detail in 1977 when an experimental
program was undertaken to  determine quantitive relationships between
precipitator performance parameters and other system variables at  State
Line  Station, Unit Three.   This is a Combustion Engineering twin furnace
steam generator.  The  Research Cottrell precipitator was designed  for 98%
collection efficiency  with a gas  volume of 657,700 ACFM at 305°F and has
a  SCA of 137 square  feet/1,000 ACFM.  Investigated were the effects  of
variation  in boiler  steaming rate, the S03 injection rate, and the
relationship derived  from the individual automatic voltage control
operating  parameters of voltage,  current and spark rate.  The independent
variables  of the experiment were the S03 injection rate and the boiler
steaming rate.  The  AVC parameters are, in effect, dependent variables  for
two reasons.  First, they  control themselves in secondary currents.
Second, the currents and spark rates are affected by the S03 injection.

    Contrary to normal operation of the boiler, the boiler steaming  rate
was held constant.   The S03 injection rate was then held constant  for
long  periods of time to observe the effects.  However, several times during
the test period the  steaming rate was reduced significantly.  The
transmissometer readings,  however, remained constant at a relatively low
level.

    A data acquisition system was installed and operated for a seven day
period.  During this time,  two different periods of "constant coal"  were
arranged utilizing Decker  and Arch Mineral.  These coals were chosen^
because of their chemical  differences as shown in Table One.  Arch Mineral,
with  its low sodium  content, results in very high resistivity fly ash;
while Decker, with its relatively high sodium content, results in a  fly ash
resistivity below  LO^- ohm-cm.


                                     229

-------
TABLE 1.  TYPICAL COAL AND ASH ANALYSIS
"As

Moisture
Sulfur
Ash
BTU/lb.

Silica
Alumina
Iron Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Magnesium Oxide
Potassium Oxide
Sodium Oxide
Received" Coal Analysis (% By Weight)
Decker
24.2
0.4
4.3
9,511
Ash Analysis
23.6
20.5
7.5
17.7
3.6
0.6
6.4
Arch Mineral
13.8
0.6
12.0
9,760
(% By Weight)
35.5
18.1
14.6
17.0
3.3
1.2
0.7
Big Horn
23.5
0.5
5.4
9,329

29.8
17.3
9.0
15.6
4.8
1.2
2.5
                  230

-------
    The data acquisition  system was  designed to collect data on a sample
basis every five minutes  from  six different AVC's and three other analog
signals representing the  outputs of  the transmissometer,  a boiler steam
rate measurement and an S03  injection rate measurement.  Every half hour
(or six five-minute samples) a block of data was transferred from the
computers memory and recorded  on the cassette tape contained in the unit.

    The data indicated that  when the system performance is measured by  the
optical transmissometer,  there is an optimum value for the SOo injection
rate.  In particular for  the coals tested, including a blend of the two
coals, the optimum  injection rate was in the range of five ppm to 20 ppm.
Values above 20 ppm were  definitely  shown to be less effective in reducing
opacity.  The effect of 803  conditioning on opacity with Decker and Arch
Mineral coals is shown in Figure Two.  The higher ash content of the Arch
Mineral coal results in an overall higher opacity as would be expected.
The optimum 803 injection rate for Decker and Arch Mineral based on this
test period was five ppm  and 20 ppm respectively.

    The data also clearly indicated  that the optimal value of 803 did not
occur when the AVC  currents  were highest or when the spark rate was a
minimum. Figure Three  shows  the current, opacity and 863 feed.  As can  be
seen, the opacity decreases  with increasing 803 feed rate and increasing
power until approximately 20 ppm of 863 is injected.  Further increases
in  the 863 feed rate results in additional power input; however, the
opacity also increases.

    In October of 1979, extensive testing of Crawford Station Unit Seven
precipitator was begun with  varying 803 feed rates.  The coals used for
these tests were Decker and  Big Horn, and their analysis is shown in Table
One.

    A total of 24 tests were conducted on Crawford Unit Seven.  This is a
220 megawatt unit with a  Combustion Engineering twin furnace steam
generator.  The Research-Cottrell precipitator was designed for 98%
collection efficiency  with a gas volume of 690,000 ACFM at 300°F and has
a SCA of 147 square feet/1,000 ACFM.  The precipitator was tested at 200
megawatts to obtain near  design gas  volume and the 803 feed rate was
adjusted in increments from  0  to 35 ppm.  The S03 feed was held constant
for a minimum of twelve hours  prior to each test.

    The tests conducted with Big Horn and Decker Coals, which are very
similar chemically, indicated  the lowest outlet dust loadings were obtained
when the 863 feed rate was set at six ppm.

    The results of  these  tests verified our earlier findings at State Line
Station that maximum precipitator power with flue gas conditioning is not
necessarily optimum removal  efficiency.

    Since the earlier  flue gas conditioning units were installed,
additional units have been purchased and installed because of fuel changes
at the stations.  The  additional units, as well as those already installed,
are shown in Table  Two.   After the installation of the original flue gas

                                      231

-------
to
u>
         Opacity
           %
        40-
         0
           0
    10       15       20
         S03 -  RPM.

OPACITY  VS SOs FEED RATE
           Figure 2
35

-------
    30C
o
^  200H
     IOO
I   25
  I
  >\

 'o
  o
  o.
 O
       0
     40 n
      0
                 863 Feed Increasing-
                     Power Increasing
                                             Opacity Increasing-
                                               $03  Increasing
              Opacity  Decreasing
                503 Increasing
                       10              20
                          SOj  Concentration- P.P. M.

               POWER INPUT  AND  OPACITY VS S03 FEED
                                 Figure 3
                              233

-------
              TABLE  2.  FLUE GAS CONDITIONING  SYSTEMS  INSTALLED
STATION
Fisk
Crawford

Joliet



Powerton
State Line



Waukegan


UNIT
19
7
8
5*
6
7
8
5
1*
2*
3
4
5*
6
8
MW (NET)
341
222
326
117
344
537
537
850
206
150
190
318
117
88
358
DATE
OPERATIONAL
April, 1979
March, 1979
March, 1979
December, 1975
December, 1975
June, 1976
June, 1976
July, 1979
September, 1975
September, 1975
December, 1974
August, 1975
October, 1975
October, 1975
May, 1976
Will County
520
                June, 1979
*Units No Longer in Operation
                                     234

-------
conditioning systems, some  of  the  generating units  were  retired,  however,
at the present time, sulfur burner type  S03 systems are  installed on
twelve units totaling over  4,600 megawatts.

    The new flue gas conditioning  systems  have been greatly  improved  over
the original units and require very little operator attention  or
maintenance.  The diaphragm type pumps  used on the  original  units have been
replaced with positive displacement piston type pumps.   They are  now
properly sized and will  produce as little  as four ppm 803, which  will
allow conditioning of coals,  such  as Decker to obtain optimum  particulate
removal.

    Our experience with  these  systems indicates that they are  reliable and
greatly improve precipitator performance at a comparatively  low investment
and operating cost.  The sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning systems have
saved Edison several hundred million dollars in capital  costs  which
otherwise would have been required to replace or increase the  size of
existing precipitators.

    The increasing  size  and cost  of precipitators to meet the  new source
EPA standards has made a combination of flue gas conditioning  and
subsequently smaller precipitators a viable option.  When purchasing  new
precipitators in  the future, the  specification will require  proposals  for a
precipitator with and without  flue gas  conditioning.  An economic analysis
will  then be performed to determine the most cost effective  way to meet
particulate emission requirements.
                                      235

-------
    THE APPLICATION OF A TUBULAR WET ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPATOR FOR FINE
    PARTICULATE CONTROL AND DEMISTING IN AN INTEGRATED FLY ASH AND SC>2
                   REMOVAL SYSTEM ON COAL-FIRED BOILERS
                       By:  Dr. Even Bakke
                            Howard P. Willett
                            Peabody Process System
                            835 Hope Street
                            Stamford, CT 06907
                                 ABSTRACT

     The development of a combined,  tubular,  wet electrostatic preclpitator
(WESP) and vapor condensing heat exchanger mounted in the top section of an
S02 absorber will be discussed.

     Pilot plant data on an integrated fly ash and S02 removal system with
a variable pressure drop venturi, a  high velocity spray tower and the WESP
will be presented.  Data will show that it is possible to operate with a
specific collection area in the WESP of only  20 to 30 sq. ft/1000 ACFM,
tube velocities of 16 to 20 ft/sec,  overall system pressure drop of 4 to 8
in. W.G. and still have fly ash removal efficiencies in the range from
99.25 up to 99.65% or outlet emissions from 0.015 gr/scfd to 0.006 gr/scfd.

     Heat recovery and flue gas reheat options made possible by the WESP/
heat exchanger combination will be discussed.  Commercial installations of
this system on industrial boilers will be reviewed.  Initial and annualized
costs and space-saving benefits will be presented.
     NOTE:
Please contact the authors for information regarding this paper.
                                   236

-------
    FIELD EVALUATIONS OF AMMONIUM SULFATE  CONDITIONING  FOR  IMPROVEMENT
           OF COLD SIDE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE

                  By  E. C.  Landham,  Jr.
                      G. H.  Marchant, Jr.
                      J. P.  Gooch

                      Southern Research Institute
                      2000 Ninth Avenue South
                      Birmingham, Alabama  35255

                      and

                      Ralph F. Altman
                      Electric Power Research Institute
                      516  Franklin Building
                       Chattanooga, Tennessee 37411

                                  ABSTRACT

     Measurement and analysis of the  improvement in cold side electrostatic
precipitator performance through the  use of ammonium sulfate conditioning
agents were conducted at two electric utility generating stations.   One  plant
was burning a low sulfur, high alkalinity Western coal and the other a moder-
ate sulfur, low alkalinity Eastern coal.  Comprehensive field tests were
performed with and without the agent  in use to evaluate the change in perfor-
mance as well as to determine  the mechanisms  involved.  The measurements
conducted included total mass  and fractional  efficiencies, particle size
distributions, rapping emissions, in  situ resistivity, ash and flue gas
analyses, and voltage-current  characteristics of  the power supplies. _Measure-
ments were made with a proprietary formulation of  ammonium sulfate injected
on the hot and cold sides  of the  air  heater and with a generic formulation
injected on the cold side.   The performance of  the precipitators was compared
with predictions of a theoretical model, and  an engineering analysis of the
installations was performed.


                                 INTRODUCTION

     Electrostatic precipitators  (ESPs)  are  the most widely
control devices in the utility industry due  to  inherently 1              be
maintenance requirements.   However,  the performance of  these  devices can be
severely limited by high ash resistivity,  ^lc\cau8!%^12eSrode  rap-
corona, and can also be limited by dust reentrainment  du™  *^°f  ™J
Ping.  Operating problems  have developed at  a number of  -tallations wher
utilities have  changed to  low  sulfur coals in an  effort to  comp  y         x

                                      237

-------
emission limitations.  At some of these installations conditioning of  the
flue gas or the coal supply with certain chemical compounds has significantly
improved ESP performance.  Even so, successful application of conditioning
agents has not been consistent primarily due to a lack of knowledge of  the
mechanisms involved.  This paper reports the results of studies conducted
under the sponsorship of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) at two
power plants using ammonium sulfate as a conditioning agent.  Ammonium  sulfate
was chosen for study because:  1) it has the potential for enhancing ESP
performance through several different mechanisms, 2) it is a relatively
innocous chemical, and 3) it is economical and readily available.  Further-
more, it has received fairly widespread usage in full scale plants as an
ingredient of one or more proprietary formulations.   The studies were
designed to:  1) quantify the improvement in performance of the control
device due to the use of the agent and, 2) determine the mechanisms by which
the agent effected the improvement.

     The two power plants included in the research program were the Corette
Station of Montana Power Company and Unit 6 of the Gannon Station of the
Tampa Electric Company.  Both stations use ammonium sulfate for conditioning
in a cold side precipitator.  At Corette, injection of ammonium sulfate
solution is made ahead of the air preheater, where the temperature is high
enough to decompose ammonium sulfate into ammonia, sulfur trioxide, and
water vapor.  At Gannon  6, injection of ammonium sulfate may be made either
before or after the air  preheater.  In the latter event, decomposition of
the agent is not expected to be complete.

Conditioning Mechanisms

     The mechanisms by which a conditioning agent may improve ESP performance
are:

     • Reduction of resistivity and/or alteration of the electrical break-
       down strength of  fly ash allowing more favorable ESP electrical
       operating conditions.

     ' Reduction of reentrainment by changing the cohesive properties of fly
       ash.1'2

     • Enhancement of the collecting electric field through the formation
       of a space charge in the region between the discharge and collecting
       electrodes.  This might be accomplished by the formation of a sub-
       micron particulate fume of ammonium sulfate.3

     • Agglomeration or  growth of small particles to form larger particles."*

Measurements

     In order to determine which of these mechanisms were involved in any ESP
performance improvement, a test plan was developed which included various
measurements conducted both with and without the conditioning agent in use.
The measurements were conducted by techniques described by Smith et al.5

                                     238

-------
They included the following:

     • Impactor sampling - Determine  inlet  size  distribution  for modeling
       purposes, fine particle  collection with and  without  conditioning, and
       changes in inlet and outlet  size  distribution  as  a result of condition-
       ing agent usage.

     • Mass train sampling - Determine particle  mass  concentrations and over-
       all performance with and without  conditioning,  quantify rapping
       reentrainment losses, and  collect samples for  chemical analysis.

     • Resistivity measurements - Determine in situ resistivity of fly ash
       with and without conditioning.

     • Ion mobility measurements  -  Determine whether  the conditioning agent
       significantly alters the charge carrying  characteristics of the flue
       gas.

     • Ultrafine particle measurements - Determine  whether  the conditioning
       agent produces a space charge fume of ultrafine  particles (at Corette
       and at Gannon), and  (at  Corette only) determine the  ultrafine particle
       collection efficiency of the precipitator.

     • Chemical analysis - Determine  the concentrations  of  flue gas and fly
       ash components related to  the  conditioning agent  and monitor coal
       supply for variations.

     • ESP electrical characteristics -  Determine the  changes in the electri-
       cal performance of the ESP caused by the  conditioning agent.
                                  CORETTE  TEST
Plant Description
     The J. E.  Corette  Station  of  Montana  Power  Company has a single 180 MW
pulverized coal-fired boiler  designed  by Combustion  Engineering, Inc., to
burn a low sulfur  subbituminous coal from  the  Rosebud  seam of the Colstrip
Mine.  The electrostatic  precipitator  is a small Research Cottrell unit with
two electrical  fields in  the  direction of  gas  flow and a specific collection
area of 27.5 m2/(m3/sec)  (140 ft2/1000 ACFM).  A hot air bypass is used to
keep the temperature of the ESP below  130°C (270°F)  to lower the ash resis-
tivity and improve ESP  performance.  The chemical injection system was
provided by Apollo Technologies, Inc.,  and  introduces the proprietary con-
ditioning agent ahead of  the  horizontal superheater.

Test Program

     Testing at the Corette Station was conducted in three phases:  1) a "con-
ditioning pretest" to obtain  some  preliminary  information on the fate of the
injected ammonium  sulfate,  conducted in August 1979, 2) a conditioning test
with comprehensive measurements as outlined previously with the proprietary
conditioning agent injected ahead  of the air preheater, conducted in

                                     239

-------
October 1979, and 3) a baseline test with comprehensive measurements without
the conditioning agent in use, conducted in November 1979.
Results

     The following results have been derived from the laboratory and field
investigation concerning the Corette Station.

Collection Efficiency

     The collection efficiency of the precipitator, on an overall mass basis,
was increased from ^77% to ^98% as a result of the use of the conditioning
agent.  Table 1 presents overall performance data obtained during the test
program.  The size-dependent data indicate that the cumulative mass collection
efficiency for particles smaller than 2.0 ym diameter increased from 57% to
92% as a result of conditioning agent usage.

Chemical Analyses

     The results of chemical analysis of the proprietary agent used at
Corette indicate that the primary active constituent of the agent was ammonium
sulfate, which represented about 38% of the agent by weight (most of the
balance was water).  As indicated in subsequent discussion, the test results
can be explained by considering the effects of the decomposition products of
ammonium sulfate (ammonia and sulfur trioxide) on fly ash resistivity.   No
effort was made to determine the effect that a low concentration of urea
(1.8%), which was also detected in the agent,  might have had on precipitator
performance, but there was no evidence of a significant effect.

     Proximate and ultimate analyses of coal samples collected during the
separate tests during August, October, and November 1980, are given in
Table 2.  These indicate that the coal was reasonably uniform throughout the
test series.

     Analytical data for the fly ash from the separate tests are given in
Table 3.  The concentration of the elemental oxides (the first 11 components
listed) indicate that the primary differences  related to electrical resis-
tivity were in the sodium oxide; the values were approximately 1.0% in
August, 0.4% in October, and 0.6% in November.  These variations are noted
because of the' importance of sodium ions as a charge carrier in the precipi-
tated ash.6'7  The variations are significant  in that the conditioning
process had to overcome a higher inherent resistivity level during the
October conditioning test than that in the August conditioning test or that
indicated by the baseline data acquired in November.

     The results of determinations of ammonia and sulfur trioxide in the flue
gas and on the fly ash during the conditioning tests in August and September
are presented in Table 4.  These measurements show clear evidence that the
ammonium sulfate did decompose into ammonia and sulfur trioxide as expected.
Apparently, the use of only two injection nozzles was not sufficient to
produce a uniform distribution of the conditioning agent.  This is illustrated


                                      240

-------
by the high concentrations of  ammonia and sulfur trioxide measured  at  the
air heater inlet port and by the  variation in ammonia concentration from port
to port at the ESP inlet.  A substantial loss of ammonia (and  perhaps  an
equivalent amount of sulfur trioxide) occurred across the air  heater,  which
may be attributed to deposition of  ammonium sulfate as a solid deposit on the
surfaces of the air heater or  to  surface-catalyzed oxidation of ammonia to
elemental nitrogen and water vapor.   Most of the sulfur trioxide was taken
up by the alkaline ash whereas most  of the ammonia that remained in the gas
phase after the air heater was discharged through the stack.

Electrical Resistivity Studies

     Measurements of the electrical  resistivity of the fly ash in situ were
made during each of the field  tests  with a point-plane resistivity  probe by
procedures described in another   document.5  In addition,  laboratory resis-
tivity measurements were performed  to substantiate observations made in the
field and to provide information  that could be used to interpret the action
of the conditioning agent.

     Field- and laboratory-measured  resistivity values and predicted resis-
tivity values are compared in  Figure 1.   The field results without  condition-
ing are represented by the upper  shaded area and those with conditioning by
the lower shaded area.  Laboratory  results with sulfur trioxide concentrations
of 0, 1.8, and 2.5 ppm at a selected temperature (about 140°C)  are  shown by
the solid triangles.  Finally, predicted resistivity values through a  range
in temperature for sulfur trioxide  concentrations of 0,  1, and 3 ppm are
portrayed by the three curves.  The field measurements without conditioning
were obtained at sulfur trioxide  concentrations below 0.5  ppm;  the  measure-
ments with conditioning were obtained at an average sulfur trioxide concen-
tration around 1.0 ppm from the  ammonium sulfate conditioning  agent.   It is
thus appropriate to compare the baseline field data with the single laboratory
data point obtained with no added sulfur trioxide (the uppermost triangle)
and the predicted curve for no added sulfur trioxide.   The agreement is
excellent.  It is further appropriate to compare the conditioning test  data
from the field at about 1 ppm  of  sulfur trioxide with an interpolated
location between the two laboratory'data points at 0 and 1.8 ppm (the  upper
two triangles) and the middle  of  the three predicted curves (for 1  ppm of
sulfur trioxide).  Again the agreement is very good.

     General observations to be made from Figure 1 are as  follows:  1) the
resistivity of the ash is highly  sensitive to temperature  in the operating
range of the Corette plant, below 150°C (300°F), and 2)  the resistivity is
also highly responsive to the  presence of even minor concentrations of sulfur
trioxide.

     Three other laboratory resistivity measurements were  conducted on the
ash to investigate possible mechanisms by which the ash resistivity might be
lowered by a factor of ten as  observed with the field measurements. These
consisted of:
                                      241

-------
     1.  Mixing ammonium sulfate participate with the ash at a concentration
         of 1% by weight to simulate co-precipitation of ammonium sulfate in
         the precipitator.

     2.  Exposure of the ash to sulfur trioxide followed by exposure to
         ammonia to attempt to reform ammonium sulfate as an essentially
         continuous surface deposit.

     3.  Exposure of the ash to ammonia vapor alone.

In each of these experiments the ash was subjected to concentrations far in
excess of those encountered in the field, but none of these techniques pro-
duced more than a factor of two change in the resistivity.

     In summary, the laboratory studies showed that only sulfur trioxide pro-
duced an effect on resistivity of the same magnitude as that observed in the
field.  In addition, the effect produced by sulfur trioxide was quantitatively
comparable with that observed in the field.

Precipitator Electrical Characteristics

     The electrical operation of the precipitator power supplies during the
test series was consistent with the in situ and laboratory measured values of
resistivity for the with- and without-agent conditions.  Comparison of the
baseline and conditioning test data indicate that the overall useful average
precipitator current density increased from 2 to 24 nA/cm  when the condi-
tioning agent was used.

     The average operating points and voltage-current relationships for the
precipitator indicate that the baseline data exhibit severe limitations due
to high resistivity, whereas the conditioning agent data sets show that
increased values of voltage and current are possible before back corona or
sparking is encountered.  However, under certain high load, high temperature
conditions, the resistivity reduction produced by the conditioning agent was
not sufficient to allow the desired level of collection efficiency to be
achieved.

Reduction of Reentrainment (Increased Cohesiveness of the Precipitated Ash)

     Measurements of ESP collection efficiency with the electrode rappers
energized and de-energized indicate that the fraction of emissions attribut-
able to rapping did decrease with conditioning agent usage.  However, the
amount of emissions due to rapping with the agent in use were not signifi-
cantly less than those predicted from a correlation developed for ESPs with
no conditioning agent employed.1  These results suggest that the most impor-
tant mechanism in the reduction of rapping emissions was the improved
electrical characteristics of the precipitator, which allowed a greater mass
fraction of the dust to be collected in the inlet fields during the with-'
agent test series.   This, in turn, allowed lower mass collection rates in the
outlet fields, and thus less dust was collected between raps for possible
reentrainment in the outlet fields.  Since a precipitator follows an
exponential mass collection efficiency relationship with collection area,

                                      242

-------
higher overall collection efficiencies generally result in reduced mass
collection rates in outlet fields.
Space Charge Enhancement
     Particle concentration measurements  with an ultrafine particle sizing
 system with agent  injection on and off provided no  evidence  of  a submicron
 fume as a result of  the  ammonium sulfate  injection.   Similarly, the ESP
 voltage-current relationships  gave no  evidence of space  charge  enhancement
 resulting from introduction of a submicron particulate.

     Ion mobility  determinations were  made with a wire-pipe  corona device in-
 serted in the flue for the with- and without-agent  test  series.  The data from
 this instrument indicated  no significant  differences  in  the  mobility of the
 charge-carrying components of  the flue gas as a result of conditioning agent
 usage.  If a less-mobile component of  the flue gas  were  to assume a signifi-
 cantly increased fraction  of the charge flux, the result would  be a space
 charge enhancement similar to  that described with the introduction of a sub-
 micron fume.

 Particle Agglomeration

     Inlet size distribution data obtained from impactor traverses for the
 baseline and the conditioning  test series show that,  within  the accuracy of
 the instrumentation,  the conditioning  agent does not  influence  the inlet size
 distribution over  the particle size range resolved  by the impactors.
 Similarly, the ultrafine sizing system detected no  significant particle con-
 centration or size distribution changes at the ESP  inlet over the particle
 size range from approximately  0.05 to  0.5 ym diameter.

 Performance Analysis

     A computer program  developed to simulate ESP operation8'9 was used with
 the data obtained  at  Corette as input  for the baseline and for  the condition-
 ing agent test series to project overall  mass efficiency as  a function of
 specific collection  area.   The results from these simulations are plotted in
 Figure 2, along with  the experimental  data obtained with mass trains.   The
 results indicate the  mathematical model was reasonably successful in predict-
 ing the overall collection efficiencies for both test series, although the
 baseline efficiency was  significantly  lower than the  value the model predicted.
 This results from  the unusually large  reentrainment emissions obtained with a
 two-stage ESP with poor  electrical operating conditions, and from the
 difficulty of estimating useful electrical conditions when the ESP power
 supplies are operating with severe sparking or back corona.  The correlation
 used in the model  for estimating reentrainment was obtained  using data from
 relatively high efficiency ESPs with several fields in the direction of gas
 flow.

     The significance of these results is  illustrated by projecting the
measured efficiency point  from the with-agent test series to the required value
of specific collection area on the curve  generated by the model for the base-
line electrical conditions.  This exercise indicates  that, without condition-

                                       243

-------
ing, a specific collection area of approximately 375 ft2/1000 acfm, i.e. an
ESP over two and one-half times as big, would be required to give the 97.5%
efficiency level obtained with conditioning agent in use.  The baseline model
projections represent the worst case of high temperature, low sodium, high
resistivity conditions observed during the test program.

                                GANNON 6 TEST

Plant Description

     Gannon Unit 6 is a 350 MW pulverized coal-fired Riley Stoker boiler built
in 1967.  It utilizes a Research-Cottrell cold side precipitator that treats
a flue gas volume of 1,350,000 ACFM with a specific collection area of 64.0
m2/(m3/sec) (326 ft2/1000 ACFM).  The ESP has four identical chambers each
with eight electrical sections in the direction of gas flow.

     The gas conditioning system was designed and installed by Apollo Tech-
nologies, Inc.  It is similar to that used at the Corette Station.  It can be
used for injection of an ammonium sulfate solution prior to either the air
preheater or the ESP (hot side or cold side injection).  It was operated in
both modes during the investigation discussed in this report.  Its normal mode
of operation is now cold side injection; originally the normal mode was hot
side injection as at Corette.

Test Program

     Testing at the Gannon Station consisted of four phases:  1) a baseline
test with no conditioning agent in use, conducted in December 1979, 2) a "cold
side proprietary agent test", in which measurements were performed in January
1980 with the normal plant procedure of injecting the proprietary conditioning
agent downstream of the air preheater, 3) a "cold side generic agent test",
in which a solution of 36% ammonium sulfate in water was injected downstream
of the air preheater, also in January 1980, and 4) a "hot side proprietary
agent test" in which the proprietary agent was injected ahead of the air
preheater.  This last phase was performed during the period January 30 -
February 1, 1980.  As a result of T-R set outages on one side of the precipi-
tator, most of the measurements were obtained across only one of the four
chambers (Chamber 4) during all four phases.

Results

     The results of experiments performed at Gannon Unit 6 and supporting
experiments performed in the laboratory are described below.

Collection Efficiency

     Normal precipitator mass collection efficiency data were obtained during
three of the four test phases using EPA Method 17 mass concentration measure-
ments across Chamber 4 of the precipitator.  In the fourth series of tests,
which were conducted with proprietary agent injected ahead of the air pre-
heater, only the "rap/no-rap" procedure employing mass train measurements was
performed.  The purpose of this procedure was to determine whether hot side

                                      244

-------
injection of ammonium sulfate  resulted  in  significant  differences  in reentrain-
ment emissions when compared with  cold  side  injection.  Mass  efficiency data
are shown in Table 5, with  data  obtained by  the  rap/no-rap method  shown in
parentheses.

     It is apparent from  these data  that the precipitator was performing at a
high level of collection  efficiency  even when the  conditioning agent was not
in use.  However, there is  considerable evidence from  resistivity  measurements
and T-R set data that the baseline measurements  were unfortunately not repre-
sentative of normal baseline conditions.   This problem will be considered
further in the subsequent discussion of conditioning mechanisms.   Even though
the baseline collection efficiency is considered to be higher than normal,
the efficiency data consistently show that reduction in penetration, or
increases in collection efficiency,  occurred as  a  result of agent  usage.

     The mass penetration of particles  smaller than 2.0 ym diameter was
reduced by 40 - 60% as a  result  of the  injection of ammonium sulfate.
Chemical Analyses

     Two  conditioning agents were  used  in  the studies  at Gannon Unit 6.  One
was a  proprietary agent supplied to  Tampa  Electric Company by Apollo Technol-
ogies, Inc.  The second agent  was  a  "generic" agent—an aqueous solution of
ammonium  sulfate purchased  by  Tampa  Electric from  another chemical supplier.
The analyses of the  two agents confirmed that ammonium sulfate was the predom-
inant  component of each.  The  data also show that  urea was present at a low
concentration in the proprietary agent  but absent  from the generic formulation.

     The  results of  coal  analyses  (Table 6)  indicated  that no unacceptable
variation occurred during the  different phases of  testing at Gannon Unit 6.
Comparison of the coal properties  with  those of  the coal burned at Corette
reveal that the coal at Gannon was of higher rank  and  contained a  higher level
of sulfur.

     Analytical data for  samples of  hopper ash obtained during each of the
field  tests at Gannon are given  in Table 7.   The major difference  between this
ash and that encountered  at Corette  is  the much  lower  alkalinity of the
Gannon ash  (as indicated  by the  calcium oxide content).  The uptake of ammonia
by the ash was increased  significantly  due to this reduced alkalinity.

     The  data in Table 8  show  that significant concentrations of ammonia and
sulfur trioxide were found  in  the  gas phase  at the inlet of the precipitator,
indicating a substantial  degree  of thermal decomposition of ammonium sulfate
even with cold side  injection  and  a  significant  persistence of the gaseous
decomposition products at the  reduced temperature  following hot side injection.

     Comparison of the concentrations of ammonia and sulfur trioxide in the
gas phase with those in the fly  ash  shows  that a substantial  fraction of each
substance occurred in each  phase.  Thus, the markedly  preferential uptake of
sulfur trioxide over that of ammonia that  was observed at Corette  was not
observed  at Gannon.  The  difference  in  behavior  of the two ashes in this
regard is attributed to the lower  alkalinity of  the Gannon ash, which makes
this ash  less hostile to  the uptake  of  ammonia.
                                       245

-------
Electrical Resistivity Studies

     Measurements of the electrical resistivity of fly ash were made for
Gannon Unit 6, as at Corette, in both the field and the laboratory.  Also,
predicted resistivities were compared with the field- and laboratory-measured
values.  The general purposes of this work were -to quantitate the effect of
the conditioning agent on resistivity, to elucidate the mechanism of resis-
tivity attenuation (through the action of undecomposed ammonium sulfate or the
individual decomposition products), and to test the agreement between measured
and predicted values.

     Figure 3 includes a presentation of field-measured resistivity values.
The two shaded areas and the two data points therein show the regions occupied
by the data and the averages calculated from the data for tests with and
without conditioning.  The upper area is for the baseline test; the lower area
is for all three conditioning tests and reveals a reduction of resistivity of
almost one order of magnitude as the result of conditioning.

     Figure 3 also presents laboratory data obtained at three concentrations
of sulfur trioxide (0, 2, and 6 ppm).   Comparison of the baseline field data
with the laboratory data shows reasonable agreement at a laboratory concen-
tration of zero sulfur trioxide.  Comparison indicates, further, that the
field data obtained with conditioning would agree with laboratory data at a
concentration between the two experimental values of 2 and 6 ppm.   Field
concentrations for sulfur trioxide were (1) less than 1 ppm in the baseline
test (determined at the inlet of Chamber 1) and (2) 0.8 to 2.4 ppm in the
three conditioning tests (determined at the inlet of Chamber 4).  Thus, the
overall agreement between the field and laboratory data is reasonably satis-
factory and indicates that the sulfur trioxide produced by thermal decomposi-
tion of the ammonium sulfate is the probable explanation of the reduction in
resistivity observed during the field conditioning tests.   However, since some
differences existed between the Corette and Gannon ashes,  the experiments to
evaluate the effects of co-precipitation of ammonium sulfate and treatment by
gaseous ammonia were repeated.  The results showed, as at Corette, less than
a factor of two change in resistivity due to these mechanisms.

     In conclusion, therefore, the apparent mechanism of resistivity attenua-
tion is the uptake by ash of sulfur trioxide resulting from the thermal
decomposition of ammonium sulfate.

Precipitator Electrical Characteristics

     Electrical characteristics of the precipitator power supplies showed
evidence of the attenuation of electrical resistivity that was revealed by
both the field- and laboratory-measured values discussed above.  Secondary
voltages and currents of the power supplies were recorded daily during each
of the test phases, and total power inputs were calculated from these data.
Average daily power inputs to the east side of the Gannon Unit 6 precipitator
(serving Chambers 3 and 4) during each phase of the testing show an average of
158 KW during the baseline test versus 254 KW for the conditioning tests.
                                      246

-------
     There was no evidence of back  corona without  conditioning, but the
current density attainable without  sparking was  enhanced by conditioning.  The
absence of back corona in the baseline  test was  confirmed by high voltage
wave-form photographs.

     There was evidence of a slow degradation of the ESP performance during the
baseline test.  Although the average  total power input to the eight electrical
sections was about 158 KW during nine days of  measurements, there was a
gradual decrease from about 200  KW  on the first  day  to about 100 KW on the
ninth day.  The favorable subsequent  effect of conditioning was thus greater
than that indicated by the average  value from  the  baseline test.  The gradual
degradation of the ESP during the baseline test  may  have been caused by a
delay in elimination of residual effects of ammonium sulfate that had accumu-
lated during prior operation with conditioning,  perhaps a gradual evolution of
sulfur trioxide from a deposit of ammonium sulfate in the duct leading to the
ESP.

Reduction of Reentrainment  (Increased Cohesiveness of the Precipitated Ash)

     Tests to compare emissions  under rap and  no-rap conditions were conducted
at Gannon Unit 6 during three of the  test series:  baseline, generic agent
with cold side injection, and proprietary agent  with hot side injection
(similar results for cold side injection of the  proprietary and generic agents
was expected).  Rapping emissions were  quantified  by two measurement systems—
Method 17 mass trains and a Large Particle Sizing  System (LPSS) designed by
this Institute to determine real-time particle concentrations in five size
ranges.

     The results obtained with the  Method 17 mass  trains reveal that both rap
and no-rap emissions were reduced on  an absolute basis with conditioning in
progress.  The data were in quantitative agreement with predictions made on
the basis of no assumed change in dust  cohesiveness.  The inference, therefore,
is that no large change in cohesiveness occurred.

     The LPSS data were in agreement  with the  Method 17 data.  The primary
additional information provided  by  the  LPSS was  an indication that, as
expected, most of the rapping emissions were of  the  larger particles, specif-
ically those larger than 3 ym.

Space Charge Enhancement

     Three types of data provided the basis for  deciding whether or not the
use of ammonium sulfate conditioning  produced  a  fine fume that could have
enhanced space charge and thus improved electrical conditions.  First was
direct measurement of concentrations  of ultrafine  particles (from about 0.01
to 2.0 ym).  Data obtained in the baseline test  fell between results of two
conditioning tests, and cumulative  concentrations  were all within a factor of
two of each other; thus, no evidence  of a fine fume  during conditioning was
obtained.  Second were the voltage-current density curves of the precipitator
transformer-rectifier sets; current density was  shifted to higher values by
conditioning, giving evidence that  resistivity attenuation overwhelmed any
contrary shift associated with space  charge enhancement.  Third were

                                      247

-------
determinations of ion mobilities without conditioning at Gannon Unit 6 and
with conditioning at Gannon Unit 5 (equipment problems prevented measurements
at Unit 6 with conditioning);  mobility values for both circumstances were
within the normal range and gave no evidence of the suppression associated
with fine particles.

Particle Agglomeration

     Particle size distributions at the precipitator inlet with and without
conditioning, as obtained with impactors and the ultrafine particle sizing
system give no indication of particle growth as the result of conditioning.

Performance Analysis

     Figure 4 gives the result of computer model simulation of the Chamber 4
precipitator with three electrical data sets:  1) those observed during base-
line conditions, 2) those observed with cold side injection of the generic
conditioning agent, and 3) a current density of 5 nA/cm2, which would repre-
sent the expected allowable current density if the in situ resistivity
increased by a factor of four over the measured values observed at the
entrance to Chamber 4 during the baseline test series.  This factor of four
increases in resistivity would represent the expected average value of resis-
tivity across the inlet to the precipitator in the absence of any residual
effects from the conditioning agent.

     These computer simulations illustrate how the performance of the unit
can become marginal with electrical conditions consistent with the expected
average values of baseline resistivity.  The loss of one equivalent electrical
section would lower the efficiency to a range in which consistent compliance
with the local emission standard of 0.1 lb/106 Btu would become doubtful,

                              ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

     At both the Corette and Gannon installation, the major cost element
associated with use of the conditioning agent is the purchase cost of the
chemical compounds.  At Corette, the cost of the conditioning agent is
0.143 mills/kWh, and at Gannon, the cost is 0.08 mills/kWh.

     At both installations, the use of the conditioning agent is cheaper, on
the basis of levelized annual costs, than the alternative option of adding
precipitator plate area to achieve the levels of particulate control which
the conditioning agent allowed to be obtained with the existing plate area.
The plate area requirements without the use of conditioning agent were esti-
mated using the EPA-SoRI mathematical model of electrostatic precipitation.

                                 CONCLUSIONS

     The following conclusions about the use of ammonium sulfate to condition
cold side precipitators can be drawn from the results discussed in this report.

     • The active ingredient of both the proprietary and generic conditioning
       agents was ammonium sulfate.  A trace of urea occurred in the

                                     248

-------
      proprietary  agent,  but apparently did not affect precipitator  perfor-
      mance.

     t Decomposition of the ammonium sulfate to ammonia and sulfur trioxide
      occurred with both hot side and cold side injection.  However,  decom-
      position was less complete at the lower injection temperature  and
      approximated the degree predicted from thermodynamic data.

     • Addition of  ammonium sulfate improved the collection efficiency of  the
      two precipitators tested on both a total mass and fine particle basis.
      The performance improvements ranged from 20% to 90% reduction  in mass
      penetration  of the precipitator.

     • The primary  mechanism by which ESP performance was improved was a
      decrease in  fly ash resistivity which allowed the precipitator to
      operate at higher power levels.  The major part of the reductions in
      resistivity  can be attributed to the effect of sulfur trioxide alone.

     • The conditioning agent does not significantly change particle  size
      for particle sizes larger than 0.05 ym diameter.  Thus, it  gives no
       evidence of  conditioning through the mechanisms of fly ash  agglomera-
       tion or production of an ultrafine fume.

     • The reduction in rapping emissions was primarily due to improved
       collection in the inlet fields and not to a large change in the
       cohesive properties of the dust.

     • The use of ammonium sulfate as a conditioning agent can be  economically
       favorable method of improving performance in comparison to  additions
       of precipitator plate area.  However, operational problems  associated
      with its use can include air heater pluggage with hot side  injection
       and duct buildups, if distribution is inadequate, with cold side
       injection.  Moreover, under certain operating conditions, the  resis-
       tivity reduction achieved by ammonium sulfate conditioning  may be
       insufficient.

                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     Officials of Montana Power Company and Tampa Electric Company were most
cooperative in providing field test facilities and adjusting normal plant
operating procedures to accomodate the needs of this research program.
Assistance by Carlton Grimm and Fred Walter of Montana Power and James L.
Hudson,  Jr., of Tampa Electric was especially noteworthy.

                                  ENDNOTES

1.  J. P. Gooch and G. H. Marchant, "Electrostatic Precipitator Rapping Re-
    entrainment and Computer Model Studies", Report EPRI FP-792, Volume 3,
    Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California  1978.

2.  J. Dalmon and D. Tidy, Atmos. Environ. 6^,  81  (1972).


                                      249

-------
3.  E. B. Dismukes, "Conditioning of Fly Ash with Sulfur Trioxide and  Ammonia,"
    Report EPA-600/2-75-015 (TVA-F75 PRS-5), U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (Tennessee Valley Authority,
    Chattanooga, Tennessee), 1975.

4.  E. C. Potter and C. A. J.  Paulson, Chem. Ind. 1974, 532.

5.  W. B. Smith, K. M. Gushing, and J. D. McCain, "Procedures Manual for  ESP
    Evaluation," Report EPA-600/7-77/059, U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1977.

6.  R. E. Bickelhaupt, "Influence of Fly Ash Compositional Factors on  Elec-
    trical Volume Resistivity," Report EPA-600/2-75/074, U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1974.

7.  R. E. Bickelhaupt, "Effect of Chemical Composition on Surface Resistivity
    of Fly Ash," Report EPA-600/2-75/017, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1975.

8.  J. R. McDonald, "A Mathematical Model of Electrostatic Precipitation
    (Revision 1): Volume I, Modeling and Programming," Report EPA-600/7-78-
    llla, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
    North Carolina, 1978.

9.  J. R. McDonald, "A Mathematical Model of Electrostatic Precipitation
    (Revision 1): Volume II, User Manual," Report EPA-600/7-78-lllb, U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
    Carolina, 1978.
                                     250

-------
SUMMARY OF METHOD  17  AND CONDITIONING AGEN'
                                                                                                                                                                                                   Table  3.




                                                                                                                                                                                        ANALYSIS OF  FLY ASH FROM CORETTE
ftugust October November
August October November conditioning conditioning baseline
T „„ Q . conditioning conditioning baseline Component" pretest testc testc
Parameters Baseline Conditioning Proximate analyst
a
Efficiency, % 77.30 97.50 * V° atlle
(69.46) (97.13) » Fixed carbon
SCA,ftJ/1000 acfm 147 143 BtU/U>
% Sulfur
Total 1.78 o 13 ultimate analysis
"2 Um °'12 °'025 Number o£ samples
Conditioning agent % Moisture
Addition rate, gal/ton coal 0 0.096 % carbon
°F - 1,000-1,150 * Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
% Chlorine
a. Estimated useful voltage and current from voltage-current % Sulfur
curves.
% Ash
b. Data in parenthesis are from rap/no-rap measurements. % Oxygen
7 17 9
11.66 + 1.74 12.85 + 1.56 11.68 £ 1.29
11.04 + 0.52 10.61 + 0.43 10.68 + 0.39
34.61 + 0.63 33.84 + 0.79 33.65 £ 0.56
42.69 + 1.00 42.68 + 0.87 43.99 + 0.91
10,172 + 236 10,079 + 200 10,206 + 154
1.07 -I- 0.11 0.71 + 0.10 0.74 + 0.03
b
a . The data given are avei
the standard deviations
b. Not performed for the ?
Table 4
Ul COMPARISON OF OBSERVED AMMONIA AND SULFUR TRIOXIDE
H- ' CONCENTRATIONS IN FLUE GAS AND FLY ASH WITH
INJECTED CONCENTRATIONS AT CORETTE

Date of Injected Concn, pprn Sampling Port Gas Phase Fly Ash
test NH 3 SO 3 Location No. NH 3 SO 3 NH 3 S03
Aug. 6.8 3.4 AH Inlet - 11.3 4.5 0.035 26
I012
ESP Inlet 2 2.5 <0.5
3 1,2 <0.5 -
5 1.6 - 0. 73 12 1
o
8 3.4 <0.5 ^
10 4.2 - p
ESP Outlet - 0.21 - jjj
Oct. 7.4 3.7 AH Inlet - 13.1 1.3 0.085 18
1010
ESP Inlet 1 1.3
2 1.2 0.5
5 1.7 -
0.33 12
7 - 1.0
IB*
9 4.0 - 1000'T(
10 3.9
LSP OiitU't - -0.7 0.018 0.95
Stack 2.7 --0.5 - F
i 1 .
r
i ' (
1 r SHA
; 290
! SYM
AVE
(BAS
: i
N
:••• |
K) — 3.2
°C — 40
op — 103
3 3
13.34 + 0.74 11.31 + 0.77
58. 56 + 0.72 59.61 + 0.48
3.94 + 0.06 3.95 + 0.05
1.03 + 0.10 1.11 ^ 0.05
0.10 + 0.01 0.03 + 0.01
0.71 + 0.08 0.72 t 0.03
10.37 + 0.36 10.64 + 0.32
11.96 + 0.18 12.63 + 0.68
Li2O
Na20
KjO
MgO
CaO
A1203
Fe20j
Si02
Ti02
S03
0.04 0.03 0.04
0.99 0.38 0.60
0.67 0.55 0.37
3.4 5.0 5.6
16.2 20.7 19.0
23.3 21.7 21.4
5.9 4.6 6.2
44.3 41.8 42.2
1.8 2.1 1.2
0.4 0.3 0.4
1.1 l.l 1.4
Total 98.10 98.26 98.41
NH3 0.010 0.004 0.0001
SO,,"2 0.98 0.70 0.60
ignited. The
ignition by ex
ages for the numbers of samples indicated plus
from the avetages. b- For * samPle c
c. For a proporti
ugust pretest. ESP inlet and
99.9
99.8

$03 (TOP, MIDDLE, AND BOTTOM CURVES, !
RESPECTIVELY!. 1 JJ-tWJ. '
j Jlij || | 1 1 f '' ** -\ 1- -
DED AREA T "7^5 ~ " "V ^ - ' N ' \ ['
IAGE VALUE!" fl^; , j J ' I
ELINE) J }7hf / \
/ m
i y/?- r 	 -SHADED AREA | I • i ' ;
f~ ~//f~ "j " " 36 DATA POINTS .1 ' ' \ \ '•
}~ ~y]\; SYMBOL IS \\ it
I/ COND TION NG) \\
I T • i • ji i j ~r i i
| - 1 M 1 1 1 1 i • I
OF S03 TOP, MIDDLE, AND BOTTOM
|| '| | ; ; . , , ! . | j

99.7
99.6
99.5
99.3
- 99.2
99.1
i 99
K 98
u,
97
j
95
94
93
92
: 91

3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1 4 1.2
60 84 112 144 182 227 283 352 441 560
141 183 233 291 359 441 541 666 826 1041 BQ
TEMPERATURE oto-tB
7D
tracting soluble NHj and SO.,'2 with water.
sllected in the mass train at the ESP inlet.
jnate blend of individual samples collected from the
jutlet hoppers.
1 I 1 1
WITH AND WITHOUT AGENT

— MODELED WITH AGENT 9 _
S • I
-D /
_ » A MEASURED WITH AGENT
_ / Q MEASURED PRETEST
— / O MEASURED WITHOUT AGENT
/
/ AGENT V = 47 kV
/ j = 24 nA/cm2
' MODELED WITHOUT
AGENT V » 30 kV i
j • 1 7 nA/cm2(8ACK CORONA
O
1 1 , 1
gure 1. Field, laboratory, and predicted resistivity values fur Corette. 100 200 300 400 500 eoO
SCA, ft2/1000 ACFM j,,, ,

-------
                  SUMMARY OF METHOD 17 AND CONDITIONING AGENT
                            DATA FOR CANNON UNIT 6
                                                        r  A • Y •   •
                                                        Lonaitioning
 Average electrical conditions
   Voltage,  kV


 Precipitator
   Efficiency, Z
   SCA,  ftVlOOO acfm

 Outlet  emissions,  lb/106 Btu
   Total
   <2  um

 Conditioning  agent
   Addition  rate,  gal/ton coal
   Temperature  of  addition,  °C
                                     (99.73)d
                                    0.006
                                    0.001
                                                           99.92
                                                           (99.91)d
                0.002     0.006
                0.0006    0.0004
                                                 0.182      0.189
                                                 179        175
                                                 355        347
                                                                        (99.84)a

                                                                        335
                                      0.159
                                      ca 540
                                      ca 1,1000
a.  Pr/CS = proprietary  agent  with  cold-side  injection.
    Ge/CS = generic  agent with cold-side  injection.
    Pr/HS = proprietary  agent  with  hot-side  injection.

b.  Estimated useful voltage and  current  from voltage-current  cur

c.  No result is available.

d.  Data in parenthesis  are from  rap/no-rap measurements.
              Ln
              to
                  COMPARISON OF AMMONIA AND SULFUR TRIOXIDE
                   CONCENTRATIONS IN FLUE CAS AND FLY ASH
                   WITH INJECTED CONCENTRATIONS AT GANNON
Type o
jrlstf

Pr/CS

Ge/CS

Pr/HS
                HH3
                       SOj
                12.2    6.1

                12.8    6.4

                10.6    5.3
Sampling


ESP Inlet
ESP Outlet
ESP Inlet
ESP Outlet
ESP Inlet
ESP Outlet
                                                    •age Observed Cone
                                                                   Fly Ash
                                                                  NH3   SO,
                                                2.6
                                                0.3
2.4
0.9
1.2
1.9
0.8
0.6
4.5
0.1
7.7
0.1
7.3
0.1
 2.8C"
<1'°x
~c c°
                                                                                                                        Table 6.

                                                                                                           ANALYSIS OF COAL FROM CANNON UNIT 6
 a.  See Table  5  for  definition of  abbreviations.

 b.  Calculated as  the  increment over the S03 equivalent in baseline ash.
     Based on samples  collected  from the flue gas ducts in mass trains,
     but in  reasonable  agreement with data for hopper samples (Table 4-9).
     Maxim
     SO-,-2
                                      Proximate analysis
                                        Number of samples
                                        % Moisture
                                        % Ash
                                        % Volatile
                                        % Fixed carbon
                                        Btu/lb
                                        2 Sulfur

                                      Ultimate analysis
                                        Number of samples
                                        % Moisture
                                        % Carbon
                                        % Hydrogen
                                        % Nitrogen
                                        % Chlorine
                                        % Sulfur
                                        2 Ash
                                        % Oxygen
test
8
8.
10.
31.
49.
12,
1.
3
8.
67.
4.
1.
0.
1.
10.
6.

13
24
84
79
033
14

73
90
31
42
16
15
19
14
Pi
3
8
9
31
49
12
1
2
8
68
4
1
0
1
10
6
r/CS

.51
.90
.87
.72
,036
.08

,14
.60
.16
.52
.18
.10
.05
.25
G,
5
8
9
31
49
12
1
2
8
67
It
1
0
1
9
6
s/CS

.48
.71
.82
.99
,039
.10

.76
.40
.28
,44
.14
.14
.94
.91
Pr/HS
3
7.
9.
31
51.
12 :
1.
2
7
69.
4.
1
0.
1
9
6.

96
.01
.93
10
.277
.19

.67
.29
.69
.50
.13
.21
.04
,48
                                                                                                                                    FIELD RESULTS WITHOUT
                                                                                                                                    CONDITIONING
                                                                                                                                        1  :  I M      I  !
                                                                                                                                     FIELD RESULTS WITH
                                                                                                                                     CONDITIONING
                                                                                                                    144    182    227
                                                                                                                    291    359    441
                                                                                                                     TEMPERATURE
                                                                                                                                                                                    ANALYSIS OF FLY ASH FROM CANNON
t
0
0
3
2
2
23
13
51
est
.01
.68
.5
.0
.0
.6
.6
.6
1.1
0
0
.29
.30
Pr/CS
0.01
0.69
4.3
1.9
2.0
25.0
13.4
48.7
1.3
0.45
0.50
Ge
0
0
4
1
1
23
13
/cs
.01
.63
.2
.8
.8
.3
.4
48.0
1
0
0
.3
.34
.90
Hr
0
0
3
1
2
23
13
53
1
0
0
/HS
.01
.63
.9
.7
.0
.5
.8
.7
.1
.20
.40
                                                                                                                                                                                         Total   98.68
                                                                                                                                                                                                            8.25   95.68  100.94
                                                                                                                                                                                                           0.050    0.088   0.046
                                                                                                                                                                           NH3                   0.003
                                                                                                                                                                                2
                                                                                                                                                                           SO,                   0.51       1.00     0.99    1.00

                                                                                                                                                                     Computed for proportionate blends of inlet and outlet hopper  sample

                                                                                                                                                                     The first 11 components were determined after the sample  had  been
                                                                                                                                                                     ignited.  The last 2 components were determined prior to  sample
                                                                                                                                                                     ignition by extracting soluble NHa and S0i,~2 with water.


                                                                                                                                                                     Table  10.
                                                                                                                                                                                     50
                                                                                                                                                           100     150     200    250     300

                                                                                                                                                     SPECIFIC COLLECTION AREA, ft2/1000 ACFM)

                                                                                                                                                       	I	1	I	I	I       I
                                                                                                                                                                                       NO. C
                                                                                                                                                                        fields 01
                                                                                                                                                                        from 332
                                                                                                                                                                                4.  Collection efficiency as a function of  SCA  or  number of
                                                                                                                                                                                     ervice at Gannon Unit 6.  (Actual SCA  values  ranged
                                                                                                                                                                                   342 ft2/1000

-------
         EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT OBTAINED WITH PULSE
       ENERGIZATION SYSTEMS ON A HOT-SIDE ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR

             By  Walter Piulle
                 Electric Power Research Institute
                 3412 Hillview Avenue
                 Palo Alto, California  94303

                 L. E. Sparks
                 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
                 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                 Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711

                 and

                 G. H. Marchant,  Jr.
                 J. P. Gooch

                 Southern Research  Institute
                 2000 Ninth Avenue  South
                 Birmingham,  Alabama 35255

                                  ABSTRACT

     Two pulse energization systems  of differing design were temporarily in-
stalled on separate chambers of a hot-side electrostatic precipitator.  Meas-
urements of overall and size dependent collection efficiency were  performed
using conventional  and pulse energization for transformer-rectifier  sets on
each of the two separate chambers.  The enhancement in performance resulting
from the use of pulse energization was evaluated on an overall mass  and on a
particle-size-dependent basis.  The results obtained from the full-scale
installation are compared with results obtained in a pilot precipitator at
EPA's Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park
N.C.  The precipitator was performing below design values without  the use of
sodium conditioning and had experienced a pattern of perf°^^d^°™*1O
with accumulated time of operation following plant outages during  which the
precipitator was cleaned by water washing.  Sodium conditioning is normally
used to maintain desired levels of performance.

                                INTRODUCTION

     Developments within the electronic industry during the past de^e have
resulted in the promotion of the  concept of pulse energization ^ ^r°v
of ESP performance.  Pulse energization was  investigated by H  J.  ™^
late 1940's and early 1950's but, due to the "^atxons of the then available
equipment, the concept was not pursued.  Pulse energization basically in

                                     253

-------
superimposing high voltage pulses on top of the normal precipitation voltage
waveform.  Several ESP manufacturers in the U.S. and abroad are now offering
pulse energization systems on a commercial scale.

     Advantages claimed for pulse energization in comparison with conventional
DC energization include:  1) higher peak voltage without sparking; 2) more
controllable corona current; 3) more uniformly distributed corona discharges;
and 4) higher input power.

     Two pulse energization systems of differing design were temporarily in-
stalled on separate chambers of the hot-side ESP at the Lansing Smith gener-
ating station of Gulf Power Company.  Side A of the ESP was equipped with a
pulsing system supplied by Buell Envirotech, and side B was equipped with a
pulsing system supplied by Research-Cottrell, Inc.  A research program was
sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, and Southern Company Services, Inc. for the purpose of
evaluating the effectiveness of pulse energization as a means of improving
hot-side ESP performance.  This paper gives preliminary results obtained from
the evaluation program.

                                 BACKGROUND

     In 1977, hot-side ESP's were retrofitted on both units at Plant Lansing
Smith to allow the plant to meet environmental regulations when they began
firing low-sulfur, low-sodium South African coal.  The units initially passed
normal compliance tests, but performance deficiency problems appeared in 1978.
A number of potential remedial approaches, such as power-off rapping,  the use
of improved transformer-rectifier (T-R) set controls, reversible-polarity T-R
sets, ammonia conditioning, ESP washdowns, and sodium conditioning,  were
attempted.  With the exception of ESP washdowns and sodium conditioning, these
procedures did not produce the desired level of ESP performance.  Each ESP
washdown did improve performance, but ESP performance degraded over a period
of from 1 to 2 months until it reached unacceptable levels.  An outage would
then be required to perform another washdown.  In early 1980, a research pro-
gram conducted by Southern Research Institute, under the sponsorship of the
Electric Power Research Institute, the Environmental Protection Agency, and
the Southern Company Services, Inc., was begun to evaluate sodium conditioning
as a potential solution to the problem.  Unit 2 at the Lansing Smith Station
(rated at 196 MW) had been operating since May 1980 (7 months) with sodium
conditioning, except for the 8 day period at the beginning of the evaluation
period for the pulsers, without an ESP washdown, with acceptable performance
levels.

                                  TEST PLAN

     The initial evaluation program called for data to be obtained from each
chamber of the Unit 2 ESP with each vendor's pulsing system operational and
with no sodium conditioning of the coal supply.  These data were to be compared
with baseline data taken previously on Lansing Smith Unit 2 when the ESP was
in a degraded condition without sodium conditioning.  A test series was also
planned which consisted of ESP efficiency measurements for each chamber to
determine the effectiveness of pulse energization for sustaining desired

                                      254

-------
levels of performance for an extended  operating period  (2  to 3 months)
Although_it was desirable to arrange the pulsing  systems for each chamber in
an identical configuration for  evaluation purposes,  equipment limitations
prevented this goal from being  accomplished.   Figure 1  (top) gives the original
electrical sectionalization of  the ESP, and  the electrical sectionalization
and areas pulsed during the pulse energization test  program (bottom).  As the
diagram indicates, the outlet half of  the plate area was pulsed on the A side,
whereas the inlet 80% of the plate area was  pulsed on the  B side.

     The test program began at  Plant Lansing Smith the  first week of November,
1980, with no sodium conditioning of the coal supply.   After the unit had
operated for 7 days without sodium conditioning,  ESP performance had degraded
to the point that, even with both pulsers operational,  compliance with local
emission codes could not be maintained unless unit load was reduced, or unless
the sodium conditioning system  was placed back in service.  Plant management
then ordered the activation of  the sodium conditioning  system to increase the
sodium oxide content in the fly ash.   From previous  conditioning tests, the
level required for acceptable performance was determined to be 'VL%.  On
November 17, the sodium oxide content  in the fly  ash was '^1%, and testing was
performed with impactors on the B side ESP with and  without pulser operation.
At this level of sodium addition, ESP  performance was relatively high (^13%
plume opacity) , and the effect  of the  B side pulser  on  outlet emissions was
difficult to determine.  A tube leak necessitated the unit to be off-line on
November 18, 1980.  After start-up, plant management agreed to lower the
sodium addition rate in order to degrade the electrical operating conditions
so that the effects of the pulsers could be  discerned at a lower ESP perfor-
mance level.  The sodium oxide  content of the fly ash was  reduced to approxi-
mately 0.7%.  At this level of  sodium  conditioning,  stack  emissions were at a
level which could be tolerated, and effects  of the pulse energization systems
were discernible.  As a result  of the  inability of the  ESP to maintain compli-
ance without sodium conditioning, the  evaluation  of  the capability of pulsing
to maintain a given level of performance for an extended period was not
conducted.

                                   RESULTS

     Averaged results from the  Method  17 mass sampling  system are presented in
Table 1.  Table 2 summarizes results from a  previously  conducted sodium condi-
tioning test series for comparison.  Coal and ash analyses are given in
Tables 3 and 4.  For reasons previously discussed, only a  limited amount of
data were obtained with no sodium addition to the coal  supply.  The results
obtained indicate that penetration decreased from 3.33% to 1.57% on the B side,
and from 3.76% to 1.68% on the  A side  as a result of pulse energization with
no sodium addition.  However, the increase in performance  on the A side
during the November 13, 1980, test appears to have been associated at least in
part with a coal composition change due to sodium sulfate  contamination of the
coal supply.  Chemical analysis of fly ash obtained  on  November 13, 1980,
gave an Na20 content of 0.41% in the fly ash, whereas the  normal baseline Na20
content of ash from the South African  coal is 0.32%.

     For the test condition of  ^0.7% Na20 in the  fly ash,  the averaged mass
train results indicate that penetration decreased from  an  average of 1.671 to

                                       255

-------
0.93% on the A side, and from 1.76% to 0.58% on the B side as a result of
pulse energization.  Individual efficiencies from which these average values
were obtained are given in Table 1.

     Total mass loadings obtained from traverses of the inlet and outlet
sampling ports with impactors are given in Table 5.  Since it is necessary to
maintain constant flow through an impactor to obtain size resolution, isokinet-
ic traverses are not possible.  However, traverses were made at a flow rate
isokinetic to the average gas velocity in the duct at the sampling location.
The results from these measurements indicate, as stated previously, no
significant change in performance due to pulse energization on the B side
(0.80% vs. 0.71% penetration) with sodium conditioning at a level equivalent
to ^1% Na20 in the fly ash.  Side A was not tested due to pulser equipment
failure.  For the M3.7% NazO addition level, the impactor data indicate pene-
tration decreased from 2.01% to 1.25% on the A side, and from 1.82% to 1.17%
on the B side as a result of pulse energization.

     Figure 2 gives efficiency as a function of particle diameter for the A
side of the ESP with and without pulsing at approximately 0.7% Na20 level.
Also shown for comparison are analogous data obtained during the sodium
condition test series with sodium at approximately the 1% Na20 level.  The
data indicate that significant improvements in collection efficiency as a
result of pulse energization were detected only for particle diameters larger
than about 2.0 ym.  Size dependent efficiency data for the B side are pre-
sented in Figure 3.  These data indicate that, up to about 1.5 ym particle
diameter, efficiency changes due to pulsing are either marginal or not
detectable by the impactor sampling systems.  For particle diameters larger
than 1.5 ym, significant collection efficiency improvement due to pulsing is
indicated.  Size-dependent cumulative emission data for the two pulsing
systems are given in Figures 4 and 5; sodium conditioning test data are shown
for comparison.  These cumulative emission data also illustrate that the
performance changes due to pulsing are observed primarily for particles larger
than 1.5 to 2.0 ym diameter.

     In addition to the impactor sampling system, an extractive sampling
system (which employs a diluter, an electrical aerosol analyzer, and an optical
particle counter) was used at the outlet of each chamber.  This system is
described in detail elsewhere.1  The system samples at a single point, and
uses electrical mobility and the optical properties of the particles as a
basis for obtaining particle size distribution data.  It also enabled pulser-
on/pulser-off comparison on a real time basis.  Outlet particle concentrations
were obtained with pulsing systems on and off, and the observed changes due to
pulse energization were reported as a percent reduction at a specified parti-
cle diameter.  These results are displayed in Table 6.  The percent reductions
shown approach the "noise level" of this type of instrumentation.  These
results are interpreted as supporting the conclusion, derived from the impactor
data, that large changes in collection efficiency were not achieved by the
pulsing systems in the fine particle size bands.

     Figure 6 presents data obtained at EPA's IERL-RTP laboratories in a pilot
unit with and without pulse energization.  These results are discussed in
detail elsewhere,2 and were obtained under conditions which were significantly

                                      256

-------
different (cold-side conditions with resuspended ash) from those encountered
at Lansing Smith.  However, it is interesting to note that these data also
indicate significant performance enhancements due to pulsing for particle
diameters larger than about 1.5 ym.

     A modified Millikan cell was used at  the outlet of each chamber to obtain
charge as^a function of particle diameter  using a technique described by
McDonald.   The purpose of these measurements was to obtain insight into the
mechanisms through which pulsing influences ESP performance.  Examination of
the data obtained in the particle size range 1.0 to 1.6 ym diameter with and
without pulsing has led to the following observations:

     • On the A side, there was no evidence of increased particle charge
       due to pulsing.

     • On the B side, there is an indication of a 25% to 30% increase in
       particle charge due to pulsing on November 20.  On November 21,
       the charge enhancement due to pulsing showed up only toward the
       upper end of the size range and only to the extent of about 15%.
       This indicates that the charge gain due to pulsing was varying
       with time during the test program.

     The significance of these observations is that, although similar overall
mass reductions were achieved by both pulsing systems, the mechanisms through
which the enhancements were accomplished were quite different.  On side A, the
performance enhancement is thought to have been accomplished primarily by
reduction of large particle emissions which seem to be associated with reen-
trainment.  On side B, the increase in particle charge associated with pulsing
is qualitatively consistent with the collection efficiency improvements (shown
in Figure 3) measured for particles in the diameter range 1.0 to 1.6 ym.  That
is, the ratios of individual particle size-dependent migration velocities
ranged from 1.05 to 1.15 when pulser-on conditions were ratioed to pulser-off
conditions.  These ratios for both the A and B sides are shown in Figure 7.
Note that the pulser-on/pulser-off ratios  for side A show essentially no en-
hancement for particle diameter less than  2.0 ym.

     Electrical operating conditions for the T-R sets not pulsed were governed
by the existing automatic controllers.  Each pulsing system manufacturer
established the operating conditions of its system.  The waveforms delivered
by the pulsing system are not presented in this paper due to a confidentiality
agreement with the manufacturers.  Generalized waveform, pulse width, and pulse
repetition rate will be given in the final report.  Also included will be
averaged and detailed electrical readings  of voltage and current, and power
consumption for each system.

                                 DISCUSSION

     Although the pulsing systems installed at Lansing Smith were unable to
allow the ESP to operate in compliance, it is of interest to consider the
implications of the performance enhancements which were achieved.  A practical
method of determining these implications is to estimate the plate area
equivalent of the performance gains effected by the pulsing systems.  Unfortu-

                                      257

-------
nately, since the mechanisms of performance enhancement are not described by
existing physical models, a precise method of calculating the plate area
equivalent is not available.

     An estimation of the plate area equivalent of the performance gains,
however, may be obtained by using the fractional efficiency data from the
impactors, and the Deutsch equation, for individual particle sizes

          V ,  /  100   \
     wi ' A ln
     to. = apparent migration velocity for the i   particle diameter,
      V
where -r = ratio of volume flow to plate area, and

     H . = efficiency for the i   particle diameter.

     The impactor data sets from both chambers were used to compute 01^ values,
which were used, in turn, to calculate new values of collection efficiency
for each particle size band in a histogram distribution at larger values of
specific collection area.  Overall mass collection efficiencies were obtained
by summing over the particle size distribution.  (That is, n = I, P. r\. where
P. is the fraction of the inlet mass in the ith particle size band in the inlet
particle size distribution.)  Results from these calculations are displayed by
the dotted lines in Figures 8 and 9.  The solid lines labeled with 0)^ were
obtained with another method which will be discussed later.  This calculation
assumes that the size dependent migration velocities will remain constant if
each chamber is increased to a larger specific collection area in the existing
respective configurations.  Although this assumption is subject to some ques-
tion, it is believed that this method is the more conservative for extrapolat-
ing the results to larger specific collection areas.

     Also shown in Figures 8 and 9 are mass train data obtained under the
indicated conditions.  Since the data from the mass trains show significantly
different results in overall mass collection efficiency from those with im-
pactors, these data were extrapolated to larger specific collecting areas
graphically by drawing curves parallel to the curves obtained from the pre-
viously described numerical integration procedure with the impactor data.
Results from this exercise are interpreted as follows for the ^0.7% Na20
level:

     t On the A side, the extrapolation indicates that pulsing allows
       a performance level to be achieved at an SCA of 66.93 m2/(m3/
       sec) (340 ft2/1000 acfm) which would require an SCA of 77.76
       m2/(m3/sec) (395 ft2/1000 acfm) without pulsing.  This is
       equivalent to a 16% increment in plate area.  The equivalent
       plate area enhancement is approximately the same for both mass
       train and impactor data sets.

     • On the B side, extrapolation of the impactor data indicates
       that pulsing allows a performance level to be achieved at an


                                       258

-------
       SCA of 64.96 in /(m3/sec)  (330 ft2/1000 acfm) which would
       require an SCA of 73.62 m2/(m3/sec)  (375 ft2/1000 acfm)
       without pulsing.  This is equivalent to a 14% increment
       in plate area.  Similar extrapolation of the mass train
       data indicates a 32% gain in plate area (from 320 to 420
       ft /lOOO acfm).

     The authors believe that these differing results were each representative
of the ESP performance at the time the measurements were made.  The wide
variation in enhancement (14 vs. 32% is thought to be associated with the
sensitivity of indicated enhancement to the level of sodium oxide actually
present in the ash undergoing collection.  Recall that with 1% Na20 in the ash
(Table 1), no enhancements were discernible.

     Another approach for estimating the improvement in ESP performance due to
pulsing was recently suggested by Feldman.1*  This approach is based on a modi-
fied Deutsch equation in the form,

     n = 100 (l-exp-[(ajkA/V)m])

in which  n = overall mass efficiency,

         to,  = modified overall precipitation race parameter,

          A = collection area

          V = volumetric flow rate, and

          m = exponent depending on the inlet particle size distribution.

An "enhancement factor" based on this approach is defined as the ratio of the
to,  values for pulsed and unpulsed performance.  Table 7 provides enhancement
factors calculated by this definition for both sides of the ESP for the
averaged mass train and impactor data sets at the ^0.7% NaaO level condition,
with values of m of 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6.  Efficiency versus SCA lines in
Figures 8 and 9 are shown derived from the (% approach with m = 0.6.   It should
be noted, however, that this calculation procedure does not account for the
particle size-dependent nature of the response to pulsing which was observed
during this test program.  It can be seen from the graphs that this method
results in larger apparent values of plate area gain than does the more con-
servative method used by the authors.

                                 CONCLUSIONS

     Although several undesirable circumstances were encountered during the
test program, it was possible to evaluate the capability of the pulsing sys-
tems for improving the performance of the hot-side ESP at Lansing Smith.  The
following conclusions have been derived from the evaluation program:

     • With no sodium addition to the coal supply, the pulsing systems
       decreased penetration from 3.33% to 1.57% on the B side, and


                                      259

-------
       from 3.67% to 1.68% on the A side.  These penetration reduc-
       tions were the largest observed on an absolute value basis.
       However, neither system allowed the hot-side ESP to operate
       in compliance (0.1 lb/106/Btu,  or 43  ng/J)  or to approach
       level of performance (0.36% penetration)5  achieved  with sodium
       conditioning.

     • With ^0.7% NaaO in the fly ash, the penetration (emissions) on
       the A side with pulsing decreased from 1.67 to 0-93% (mass
       train data), and from 2.01 to 1.25% (impactor data) penetra-
       tion without pulsing.  It must be noted that the pulser system
       on A side operated only during the testing period and not on a
       24 hour basis.

     t With ^.7% Na20 in the fly ash, the penetration on the B side
       with pulsing decreased from 1.76% to 0.58% (mass train data),
       and from 1.82 to 1.17% (impactor data).

     • For particle diameters smaller than about 1.5 ym, the changes
       in collection efficiency due to pulsing were relatively small
       and were near the resolution limits of the instrumentation.
       For particle diameters larger than 2.0 ym, significant
       improvements in collection efficiency as a result of pulsing
       were observed.

     • The long-term capability of pulse energization to sustain a
       given level of performance improvement could not be deter-
       mined due to the limited duration of the test program.

     • These results were obtained with a hot-side ESP which had
       experienced performance degradation due to a sodium deple-
       tion process adjacent to the collection electrode.   The
       results, therefore, are not necessarily applicable  to cold-
       side applications where different charge transport  mechanisms
       through the dust layer may be involved.

     A more detailed presentation of results, along with discussions of possi-
ble mechanisms involved in the observed performance enhancements, will be
presented in the project final report.
                                     260

-------
                                      ENDNOTES

  1.  Wilson,  R. R. ,  et al.  Guidelines  for  Participate  Sampling in Gaseous
      Effluents from  Industrial Processes.   EPA-600/7-79-028 (NTIS PB  290899)
      January  1979.

  2.  Rugg,  D. , et  al.   "Electrostatic Precipitator Performance with Pulse
      Excitation."  To  be Published.

  3.  McDonald, J.  R.,  M. H. Anderson, R. B.  Mosley, and L.  E.  Sparks.
      J. Appl. Phys.  51, pp. 3632, 1980.

  4.  Feldman, Paul L.   "Pulse Energization:  Present Status."  Presented  at
      the  "Second Conference on Air Quality  Management in the Electric Power
      Industry."  January 22-25, 1980, Austin,  Texas.

  5.  Gooch, J. P., et  al.  "Improvement of  Hotside Precipitator Performance
      with Sodium Conditioning - An Interim  Report."  To be  Published.
            LANSING SMITH PULSER EVALUATION
              METHOD 17 MASS RESULTS
Date
Particulate
Mass Loading, Precipitator
mg/DNm3 Efficiency SCA
Inlet Outlet % m2 /(ms/sec)
Loc
Sal
:ation
ipling
Condition
NO SODIUM ADDITION

11/11/80
11/12/80

11/12/80
11/13/80



11/20/80
11/20/80
11/20/80
11/20/80
11/23/80
11/23/80
11/24/80
11/24/80
11/25/80
11/25/80

15
16

13
14.

,786
,227

,881
.327

526.4
255.2

509.2
240.3

96.67
98.43

96.33
98.32

65.26
63.19

69.29
67.22

B
B

A
A

Side
Side

Side
Side

Pulser
Pulser

Pulser
Pulser

Off
On

Off
On
Table 2
RESULTS FROM SODIUM CONDITIONING TEST SERIES
Efficiency SCA Sampling
Dace Z • mz/(»J/sec) Location Condition

3/14-19/80 99.88 63.78 A i B Baseline 1
Sides After Washdow
4/22-5/2/80 98.21 61.61 A 5 B Baseline 2 -







Sides After Degradatioi


13
16
14
14
16
15
14
14
14
13
SOD

,778
,479
,602
,213
,341
,472
,991
,178
,098
,984
IUM ADDITION;

66.4
128.2
82.4
124.7
272.4
337.6
156.8
154.5
263.2
MX

99.60
99.12
99.42
99.24
98.24
97.75
98.89
98.90
98.12
,7% Na;0 IN FLY

61.61
61.42
64.37
67.91
62.11
60.63
63.09
66.93
67.81
68.90
ASH

B
B
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
A


Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side


Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser
Pulser


Off
On
Off
On
On
Off
Off
On
On
Off

5/14-24/80 99.64 63.39 A i B Conditioning

1
Sides Sodium Sulfate
Conditioning to
M.OZ Na20
















a. All outlet loadings were determined at the outlet of the hot-side precipi-
  tator which is followed by a cold-side preclpitator.

b. Probable coal change.
    TYPICAL ASH ANALYSES
(EXPRESSED AS % OP IGNITED SAMPLE)

Table 3

TYPICAL COAL ANALYSIS
Date

7. Moisture
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
% Chlorine
% Sulfur
% Ash
7. Oxygen
% Volatile
% Fixed Carbon
Cal/g
Btu/lb
11-11-80
As Received
4.82
69.82
3.89
1.71
0.02
P. 85
12.86
6.69
25.98
56.34
6630
11935

Dry
-
72.66
4.09
1.80
0.02
0.89
13.51
7.03
27.30
59.19
6966
12539
                                          261
Sample
JOJUH J.H
Li^O
NajO
K20
MgO
CaO
FejOj
AljOs
Si02
TiOz
PaOs
SO,
LOI
No Sodium Addition
0.08
0.39
0.52
2.5
9.6
5.8
33.2
38.8
1.7
2.7
1.1
17.0
MJ.7Z Na20 Level
0.09
0.88
0.52
2.6
10.3
5.6
33.1
39.0
1.8
2.6
0.88
17.5

-------
                         AVERAGE MASS LOADING CALCULATED
                            FROM CASCADE  IMPACTOR DATA
                 Participate
                Mass Loading,
                  mg/DNm3
               Inlet    Outlet
                         Precipitator
                      Efficiency     SCA
                          %       mVdn'
                               Sampling
                      c)  Location Condition
                       SODIUM ADDITION M.(K  Na20 IB FLY ASH
  11/17/80
  11/17/80
15,699  110.7
15,699  125.2
99.29
99.20
59.79
59.79
B Side   Pulser On
B Side   Pulser Off
                        SODIUM ADDITION M).7%  NaaO IN FLY ASH
  11/21-22/80  15,657   183.6        98.83        64.83
  11/21-22/80  14,784   269.0        98.18        64.83
  11/24-25/80  13,959   174.3        98.75        66.68
  11/24-25/80  16,263   326.1        97.99        66.68
                                                B Side    Pulser On
                                                B Side    Pulser Off
                                                A Side    Pulser On
                                                A Side    Pulser Off
  a.   All outlet loadings  were determined  at  the outlet of  the  hot-side precipi-
      tator which  is  followed by a cold-side  precipitator.



Size, V
Percent

Size, u
Percent
Table 6
ULTRAFINE SYSTEM DATA
B Side
m 0.075 0.24 0.59
Reduction 18 17 29
A Side
m 0.075 0.24 0.59
Reduction 7 19 8



1.2
41

1.2
22
                                                                                                                                  Table 7

                                                                                                                  CALCULATIONS USING VARIOUS VALUES FOR m
Pulsing Ho Pulse
m


0.4
0.5
0.6

0.4
0.5
0.6


0.4
0.5
0.6

0.4
0.5
0.6
CD, , cm/sec OL
A SIDE
Mass Trains"
71.2
32.9 ..
19.7
Impactors
62.0
25.6
18.1
B SIDE
Mass Trainsc
98.0
43.2
25.0
Irapactors
62.6
29.7
18.0
,, cm/sec


50.9
25.2
15.7

46.5
23.5
14.9


53.4
26.6
16.7

48.2
24.1
15.2
Ratio


1.40
1.31
1.25

1.33
1.26
1.21


1.84
1.62
1.50

1.30
1.23
1.18
                                                                                            a.   SCA   66.5 mVdn'/sec), r\   99.07 and 98.33
                                                                                            b.   SCA   64.83 m2/dn'/«ec), n - 98.75 and 97.99
                                                                                            c.   SCA   61.44 mVdn'/sec), n   99.42 and 98.24
                                                                                            d.   SCA . 66.68 mVdn'/sec), n   98.83 and 98.18
                                                      PLATE AHEA  PLATE AREA
                                                                 2,890
                                                        31,104    2.890
                                                        31,104    2.890
                                                        23,328
                                                        23,328
                                                        15,552
                                                  2,167
                                                  2.167
                                                  1,445
                                                        31,104
                                                        31.104
                                                        31,104
                                                        23,328
                                                        23,328
                                                        15,552
                                                  2,890
                                                  2.890
                                                  2.890
                                                  2,167
        NORMAL ELECTRICAL SECTIONALIZATION
                              .AREA PULSED BY BUELL
x"'
FLOW
\
•^
\


/rBs

f- — —-
\ "


C^)



\

frS-
Vi>
ft
^

i
j
I
I
S)
J

(T»

@



" "1

!



^\^ FT2OF FULL OR «2 OF
^ TR PLATE AHEA PULSED HALF WAVE PLATE AREA
S|_ A 31.104 NO FU Z890
E 15.552 NO FU 1,445
jS J 38,880 YES FU 3,612
^/^ G 38,880 YES FU 3,612
^^ B 31,104 YES HA 2.890
D 31,104 YES HA 2.890
H 15.552 YES FU 1,445
K 15.5S2 YES FU 1,445
.S^ M 31.104 NO FU 2,890

  ELECTRICAL SECTIONALIZATION DURING PULSER TESTING
                                                                                                     $     95.0 _
                                                                                                                           1.0
                                                                                                                                                  5.0
                                                                                                                                                             100
                                                                                                                                                           10.0
                                                                                                            PARTICLE DIAMETER, ,um           (eoo^


                                                                                          Figure 2. Fractional efficiency of A side ESP • pulsar on and off.
Figure 1. Schematic of Lansing Smith Unit 2 hot-side ESP, transformer-rectifier arrangement.
                                                                                   262

-------
                      •—CONDITIONING 1 TEST SERIES
                           MAY 1980 (A&B SERIES)
                      — B SIDE PULSE
                      	B SIDE PULSE
                                                                                                               0.7% NazO
                                                                                                                                             A SIDE PULSER OFF
                                 1.0                       5.0        10.0
                                   PARTICLE DIAMETER, urn
                               PARTICLE DIAMETER, *
Figure 4. Cumulative outlet emissions versus particle diameter - A side impactor data,
         11/24-25/80*
             Figure 3. Fractional efficiency of B side ESP - pulsar on arid off.
                                                                                                          a. Emission from hot-side ESP upstream of cold-side ESP.
                      1.0                    10.0                   100.0
                              PARTICLE DIAMETER, jj.m                mo T

Figure 5. Cumulative outlet emissions versus particle diameter - B side impactor data,
         11/21-22/80.3
                                                                                                                             1.0
                                                                                                                          PARTICLE DIAMETER, (I
   Figure 6.  Fractional efficiency data from U.S. EPA, IERL, RTP, pulse energization tests.
            a. Emission from hot-side ESP upstream of cold-side ESP.
                                                                                  263

-------
s
3-
              	BSIDE
                   1—I   I  I  I  11
                                                         I   i  i .
                      0.5        1-0         2.0            5.0        10
                          PARTICLE DIAMETER, micron*
                                                                                                        350         400         450
                                                                                                         SPECIFIC COLLECTION AREA, f
           70          80          90
            SPECIFIC COLLECTION AREA,
  Figure 7. Effect of pulsing on the migration velocities of various particle sizes.
O MASS TRAIN DATA WITH 0.7% Na^O, 11/20, 24-25/80
A IMPACTOR DATA WITH 0.7% NayO. 11/24-25/80
D MASS TRAIN DATA WITH CONDITIONING, 5/8 (1-0% Nl^O)
   OPEN SYMBOLS - PULSER OFF    CLOSED SYMBOLS  PULSER ON
                                                                                        Figure 8.  Effect of increasing collection area on collection efficiency of A side.
                                                        350         400        450         WO
                                                          SPECIFIC COLLECTION AREA. ft2/kacfm
                                               60          70         SO          90         100          11
                                                           SPECIFIC COLLECTION AREA, m2(m3/i>e)

                                              O MASS TRAIN DATA WITH 0.7% NajO, 11/208.23/80
                                              A IMPACTOR DATA WITH 0.7% N>20. 11/21-22/80
                                              O MASS TRAIN DATA WITH CONDITIONING, 5/80 (1.0)1 N»2°>
                                                OPEN SYMBOLS . PULSER OFF    CLOSED SYMBOLS - PULSER ON
                                         Figure 9.  Effect of increasing collection area on collection efficiency of 8 side.
                                                                         264

-------
              A NEW MICROCOMPUTER SYSTEM AND  STRATEGY FOR THE
                   CONTROL OF ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS

                    By:  K.J. McLean
                         T.S. Ng
                         Z .   Herceg
                         Z .   Rana

                         University of Wollongong
                         Wollongong.  N.S.W.   2500
                         Australia

                                  ABSTRACT

     The paper outlines a new microcomputer control system for electrostatic
precipitators.  The system comprises three stages of development.   In the
first stage, a microcomputer, together with appropriate interfacing hardware,
replace the existing analogue controllers and implement the present control
strategy.  In the second stage,  the  computer will carry out diagnostic
analysis of voltage and current  relationships for each zone and then initiate
remedial action if necessary.  In the  third stage, the dust monitor output
will be used to adaptively fine  tune the control settings.


                                 INTRODUCTION

     Electrostatic precipitators are one of the most efficient and economical
means of removing particulates  from effluent  gases  at large coal-fired
installation^n! are  extensively used on  boilers at electrical generating
sSionf   ?ne  basic principle  of operation   design and  applications of
electrostatic precipitators  have been  well documented  (1, 2,  3).
      The most  efficient operating conditions '""^ J^Sf ^"ow In
 maintained at  or near their maximum value.  Since Australian coals are  low
 sulphur content, the resistivity of the resul tant fl y ash is very hig
 this adversely affects the precipitator P"*^^4^ ^elcing the
 'back corona'  formed on the collecting P1^6* j^^f "barging of  the
 sparkover  voltage, increasing *^™*^,^£^ t^lL stream.   The
 suspended  particles by the positi              ed into tneg
in existing electrostatic               ^^07.  These
                                      l conditi
      in existng eec                                   0.  Tese
 regulated from some Predetermined electrical conditi               coliected
 may vary with the manufacturer and  ^jope^        minimum sparkover
 but are usually based on spark rate,  cu«f^/^ settings for the control
 voltage or some combination of these    T^ ^^ J[ch may be up-dated
 systems is based on a series  of  special tuning t           conditions
 from time to time.  This approach assumes that the  opti          ^
 remain unchanged for all operating  modes  ^a
 precipitator condtions  and  the inevitable coal

-------
     With the recent development of reliablle optical monitors and the
availability of relatively cheap microcomputers, we now have the opportunity
to develop a new control philosophy for electrostatic precipitators.

     The overall aim of the programme being undertaken by the Electrostatic
Precipitator Research Group at the University of Wollongong is to develop a
comprehensive computer control system comprising three development stages.
In the first stage, a microcomputer, together with appropriate interfacing
hardware, replace the existing analogue controllers and the microcomputer is
programmed to adjust the corona voltage at five minute intervals to a level
just below the sparkover voltage.  Spark rate, current and voltage levels are
monitored continuously and provision is made for a suitable protection and
alarm system.  In the second stage, the computer will carry out a diagnostic
investigation of each zone using the voltage-current relationships and then
initiate special remedial action if required.  For the final stage, signals
from the optical monitor, placed at the output of the precipitator and
adaptive control techniques, will be used to fine tune the spark rate, voltage
and current levels.  The system described in this paper is designed to be
installed to one pass of an electrostatic precipitator at Munmorah Power
Station, N.S.W., Australia.  Each of the development stages will now be
discussed in more detail.

Stage 1 - Computer Control System

     Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the power supply and existing control
scheme for one zone of the electrostatic precipitator.  The saturable reactor
is controlled by a dc current supplied from the saturable reactor control
unit.  This control current is obtained from a full wave rectified voltage
switched through an S.C.R.  Its switching angle is controlled by feedback
signals provided by the automatic controller and maintains a predetermined
current and voltage level, and spark rate.

     The area within the dotted line is the block diagram of the computer
control system for five zones of one pass.  The existing automatic analogue
and the prototype computer control system can be separately switched into the
same line providing the main control signal to the dc control for the
saturable reactor.

     A Rockwell AIM 65 single board microcomputer is used in this unit.  It
comprises a 6502 C.P.U. with eight K bytes of memory and six, eight bit
bidirectional I/O ports.

     The overall computer control system is shown in Figure 2.   One analogue
multiplexer is used to read voltages-and currents for the five zones, using
time multiplexing techniques.  The spark status is counted independently for
all the zones and is read continuously.  The output control signals for the
five zones are converted back to analogue voltages and transferred to the
saturable reactor control units through voltage to current converters.
                                      266

-------
                               HIGH VOLTAGE
                               TRANSFORMER
                                                                          PSECIPITATOR
ZONE 1
         Figure  1:   Block diagram showing  the interconnection of the
                     existing  analogue control system with  the microcomputer.
ZONE 2
                             1 ZONE 3
A ZONE
                                       SPARK INPUT FROM
                                       ALL ZONES
                                            A
                                                              ZONE 5

A

iES


1 1
D/A



LATCHES



D/A

|
LATCHES
1




1
D/A



LATCHES
f)



D/A


LATCHES
'
TO MUL
LATCHE
JJ


                                                                        MM Nil
                                                                          DECODERS
       V AND 1 INPUTS
         Figure 2:   Overall  organisation of the computer control  system.
                                      267

-------
     At this stage, the software is written to adjust the corona voltage  to  a
value slightly below the sparkover level at five minute intervals.  The normal
control loop then goes through each zone at one second intervals to measure
the voltage, current and spark rate.  If the spark rate exceeds the pre-
determined value, the voltage is immediately reduced to just below the spark-
over level.  Similarly, if the current exceeds a predetermined value  (possibly
due to excessive back corona), the control signal is adjusted to reduce the
current to some predetermined value.

     At the time this paper was written, the microcomputer control unit had
been constructed and tested at Munmorah Power Station.  During the tests  the
dust emissions were reduced using the computer control system when compared
with that obtained using the existing analogue system (see Figure 3).  However,
much more extensive testing is necessary in order to obtain more data to  cover
all possible operating conditions.
Figure 3:
Variation of the
optical monitor
output with type
of control
A.  Computer control on.
B.  Normal analogue control
    on
                                                    TIME (HOURS)

Stage 2 - Diagnostic Tests and Remedial Action

     Preliminary tests have been carried out on two of the eight passes of an
electrostatic precipitator at Munmorah Power Station and some typical V-I
characteristics are shown in Figure 4.

     These characteristics change with time and have a tendency to operate
in a high voltage low current mode as dust layer builds up on the collecting
plates.  These characteristics can be changed as shown in Figure 4 if special
rapping cycles are introduced.
                                      268

-------
             0.10  -
            S 0.05 *
             o
             cr.
             o
          Figure 4:  Variation of votlage current characteristics with
                     collecting plate contamination.
          1.  Very dirty plates.    2.  After period of intensive rapping.
          3.  Relatively clean plates.

     In the second  stage of the  system  development,  the computer will be
 programmed to evaluate  the characteristics  of  each  zone and  take the
 appropriate remedial action.  For  example,  when a particular zone is operating
 in  the strong back  corona  mode,  indicated by curve  3,  the  computer could be
 programmed to detect this  and adjust  the control signal so that its operating
 point is close to or just  on the onset  of back corona.

     A further extension of this mode of control would be  to regulate the
 rapping of each zone.   Once the effects of  dust thickness  have been
 characterised, an optimum  rapping  sequence  could be  programmed into the
 computer based on V-I characteristics.  Special intensive  rapping cycles can
 also be initiated for individual zones, aided by the switching off of the
 power supply, when  the  dust build up becomes excessive.

 Stage 3 - Adaptive  Control

     In order to fully  utilise the potential of a computer control system,
 certain optimal control theory could be made to apply to the precipitator.
 With the development of reliable dust monitors,  the  computer could be
 programmed to implement a  model reference adaptive control system.  Figure
 5 shows the block diagram  for such a system.

     In Figure 5, GI to 65  represent the invariant transfer  function for the
 control system for each zone (see also  Figure  1) and G6 represents the time
varying transfer function  for the electrostatic precipitator.  The adaptive
                                      269

-------






1 	 v













ADAPTIVE
CONTROLLER













* —
•*
-i



















.r
\
1







.r
S


•\ ,
?
r v







•\ 1
p
\


Gl
I, SR

I

i

1


G5
, I. SR































DISTURB
1
_Ai

^G6
-*







                                                                DUST
                                                                MONITOR
                                                                OUTPUT
          Figure 5:  Block diagram of an adaptive controller.
controller continuously up-dates the parameters of Ge based on the dust
monitor output and the voltage, current and spark rate feedback from the
control unit of each zone.  Using certain optimal control techniques such as
self-tuning regulations and minimum variance control techniques (5, 6),
the settings for spark rate, current and voltage levels can be continuously
adjusted to obtain the maximum possible performance of the electrostatic
precipitator.

                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     The authors are grateful for the financial and technical support given
by the Electricity Commission of New South Wales and the National Energy
Research, Development and Demonstration Programme administered by the
Australian Commonwealth Department of National Development and Energy.

                                  ENDNOTES

1.  White, H.J.  Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation.  Reading, Mass.,
    Addison-Wesley, 1963.

2.  Hall, H.J.  Design and Application of High Voltage Power Supplies in
    Electrostatic Precipitation, J. Air Poll. Cont. Ass., 25: 132-38, 1975.

3.  Oglesby, S. and Nichols, G.B.  Electrostatic Precipitation.  New York,
    M. Dekker, 1978.
                                      270

-------
4.  McLean, K.J. and Kahane, R.B.  Electrical Performance Diagram for Pilot-
    Scale Electrostatic Precipitators.  (Presented to the Symposium on
    Transfer and Utilisation of Particulate Control Technology, Denver,
    U.S.A., 1978).

5.  Astrom, K.J.  Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory.  New York,
    Academic Press, 1970.

6.  Astrom, K.J., Borisson, V., Ljung, L. and Wittenmark, B.  Theory and
    Application of Self-Tuning Regulators.  Automatica, 13:  457, 1977.

7.  Lamb, A.N. and Watson, K.S.  Electrostatic Precipitation of Fly Ash from
    Low Sulphur Coal  in Power Stations.   (Presented to the Symposium on the
    Changing Technology of Electrostatic  Precipitation, Adelaide, Australia,
    1974).
                                       271

-------
    ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL FOR THE HIGH  INTENSITY  IONIZER
                      IK THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY
                  By:  John S. Lagarias
                       Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
                       Oakland, California

                       Jack R. McDonald
                       Southern Research Institute
                       Birmingham, Alabama

                       Dan V. Giovanni
                       Electric Power Research Institute
                       Palo Alto, California

                                  ABSTRACT

     The High Intensity Ionizer (HII) has reached a level of development where
projections can be made of its potential in the electric utility industry.
Computer simulations have been conducted to predict the maximum electrostatic
precipitator (ESP) performance enhancement of HII applications for high- and
low-resistivity fly ash applications.  Future electrostatic precipitator per-
formance requirements have been forecast based on an assessment of possible
changes to regulations for mass emissions, fine particulate, and opacity.  A
forecast is made of the equipment which may be used over the next 15 years for
upgrading existing precipitator installations.  Alternative means of upgrading
ESP performance were also considered.  We conclude that the HII may be one ap-
plicable method for upgrading electrostatic precipitators to meet possible
more stringent regulations and may be used by as much as 20 to 25 percent of
the upgrade market.
                              1.  INTRODUCTION

     This report examines the commercial potential for the High Intensity Ion-
izer (HII) to upgrade existing electric utility precipitators over the next
15 years.  Situations where the HII may apply and the segment of the market
which the HII may capture are estimated.  In making the analysis, competing
alternative processes for improving precipitator performance have also been
considered, such as adding more specific collection surface area, gas condi-
tioning, and pulse energization.

     EPRI has been involved with the development of the HII technology since
1974 including benchscale, pilot, prototype, and full-scale testing.  Much of
the experimental evaluation of the HII has been cenducted at the EPRI Arapahoe
Test Facility in Denver, Colorado.  The HII development has now reached a
stage where projections of its commercial performance may be made.  To assess
the commercial potential of the HII, however, a brief review of the current
ESP situation is appropriate.

     Fly ash ESP's have been used by utilities since 1923, but it was not un-
til the 1950's,  when pulverized coal-fired boilers became common and started

                                     272

-------
to Increase significantly in size, that ESP performance became essential to
utility operations.  Since their initial usage, about 1,900 utility fly ash
ESP s have been installed in the United States, most (1,400) since 1950.  Of
this number, 550 were installed in the last decade  (1970-1980) including ap-
proximately 100 "hot" ESP's for high resistivity fly ash applications.

    Over the past 30 years, the collection efficiency of installed ESP's has
Improved dramatically through advances in equipment performance and design.
For example, the average design efficiency for fly ash ESP's selected in 1950
was 93.5%.  By 1970, the average design efficiency had increased to 99.0%
and, by 1980, performance specifications quite normally called for efficien-
cies in excess of 99.5%.

    Today, however, ESP's face an uncertain future.  Questions of applicabil-
ity,  cost, and most of all, reliable performance, are being raised.  Changes
in environmental regulations, particularly those involving opacity and fine
particulate, stipulate levels of emission control which may be difficult to
sustain.  Competitive particulate reduction methods such as the use of fabric
filter collectors or process modifications (solvent refined coal, combined
gas/particulate controls, coal gasification, etc.) are starting to be used.
These actions suggest that the potential of the electrostatic precipitator to
the electric utility industry be reviewed critically.  The issues are parti-
cularly significant as this country moves to a greater usage of coal.

    The approach used in this analysis was to combine:
(1)  An engineering assessment of the commercial performance and cost of the
     HII based on extrapolated results of the HII at the Arapahoe Test Facil-
     ity;
(2)  A scenario of possible future particulate regulatory changes;
(3)  A survey of experienced designers, users, and scientists of ESP's as to
     the performance of existing utility fly ash ESP's;
(4)  An identification of other available particulate control methods;
(5)  An assessment of the type of upgrading that ESP's would require to meet
     the particulate scenario; and
(6)  A projection of the commercial usage for the HII to the electric utility
     industry over the next 15 years.

    In making an engineering assessment of the commercial performance and
cost of the HII, we assumed that the increased charging capability of the HII
demonstrated at Arapahoe could be obtained in full-scale units and incorpo-
rated into existing ESP's.  This analysis would thus indicate the maximum
performance we could expect from the HII.


    To understand j-ust what performance levels the utility ESP's would be re-
quired to meet in the future, it was necessary to create a scenario of pos-
sible future regulations which precipitator performance should address.  We
identified mass emissions, fine particulate, and opacity as being of greatest
concern.  For the purposes of our analysis, we assumed a number of regulatory
changes to occur over the next 15 years which would require existing utility
fly ash precipitators to be upgraded.

                                    273

-------
     To assess the condition of existing precipitators, a survey was made of
knowledgeable precipitator users, suppliers, and scientists.  We asked for
their assessment as to the ability of existing precipitators to comply with a
scenario of assumed regulatory changes.  The survey was entirely subjective
and based on the best judgment and experience of those interviewed.  The con-
sensus was translated into a numerical assessment.

     We identified the performance improvements that existing precipitators
wou^d have to meet and further identified competing technologies, in addition
to the HII, that might be used to upgrade ESP's.  Cost and performance compa-
risons were made of the available alternative upgrading methods and the HII
which could be used to meet performance improvement previously identified.
Comparisons were made by simulation studies of two specific installations for
which performance data were available.

     Combining all of the above information, we then forecast the number of
existing ESP's which could require upgrading during each of the next three
five-year periods, 1980-1984, 1985-1989, and 1990-1995.  The number of instal-
lations where the HII might be used, and the potential magnitude of the HII
market, were identified.


                   2.  ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE AND COST

     Tests made by Southern Research Institute (SoRI)  of the performance of an
HII array on a pilot ESP at the EPRI Arapahoe Test Facility have demonstrated
that the HII can charge individual fly ash particles to much higher levels
than a conventional ESP.  However, some loss of charge has occurred downstream
of the HII, and methods are still to be developed to reduce this loss.  For
the purpose of this analysis, however, it is assumed that in a commercial in-
stallation the HII will be able to fully charge entering fly ash particles  in
agreement with theory and experimental results, and that an existing ESP will
be able to collect the highly charged particles.

     To evaluate commercial potential, an analysis was made of the capability
of the HII, along with three alternative methods, to upgrade precipitators  to
meet certain target performance levels.  Two existing precipitators were
selected, one handling high resistivity fly ash and the other handling low
resistivity fly ash.  Precipitator and boiler data for the two installations
are given in Table 3-1.  The efficiency required for each precipitator to
meet a target emission level of 0.1 lb/10  Btu was calculated and shown on
Table 3-2.  It should be noted that the two precipitators had significantly
different ratings (180 and 92 SCA ft /1000 acfm).

Options for Upgrading ESP's

HII Addition

     According to theory, the High Intensity Ionizer (HII), installed as a
precharger to an existing precipitator, creates an extremely high initial
charging field and is especially effective for fine particle charging.  The
HII would be used where, for a number of reasons, inadequate charging is ob-
tained in a conventional electrostatic precipitator and would be powered
independently of the precipitator power system.
                                    274

-------
     The performance of the High Intensity Ionizer was evaluated at Southern
Research Institute  (SoRI) using an EPA/SoRI computer simulation model (EPA-
600-7-78-111A) of an electrostatic precipitator preceded by an HII array.
The expected HH-precipitator efficiency was calculated as a function of ioni-
zer voltage  (Figure 3-1).  The ionizer voltage required to meet the desired
outlet emission level was determined from this information.  Computer analy-
ses were also made of the anticipated performance of the High Intensity Ioni-
zer added to an ESP for fine particulate under 2.5 microns (Figure 3-2).  The
results indicated that a substantial improvement could be obtained for the
removal of fine particulate using the HII, especially when high resistivity
fly ash is involved and thus could prove effective in meeting opacity require-
ments.

Additional Plate Area

     Computer model studies were made to predict the anticipated efficiency
of adding additional collecting surface to each precipitator.  In each case,
the computer model was corrected for nonuniform gas flow and for reentrain-
ment loss.  Precipitator efficiency was identified as a function of specific
collection area (Figure 3-3).  The specific collection area required to
achieve a performance level of 0.1 lb/10  Btu was obtained using Figure 3-3.

Pulse Energization

     At least two companies offer pulse energization systems to enhance par-
ticle charging using high voltage pulses superimposed on conventional DC
voltage power supplies.  Pulse energization would be proposed for high re-
sistivity fly ash applications and is considered to be at an engineering de-
monstration stage.  Model studies of the anticipated precipitator performance
by the addition of pulse energization were calculated as projected increases
in migration velocity based on published enhancement values.

Gas Conditioning

     Conditioning of fly ash through flue gas additives is used where high
resistivity fly ash conditions exist, especially where a utility may have
switched from high sulfur to low sulfur coal.  Sodium, sulfur, and proprietary
chemical compounds have been used as conditioning agents.  Over 150 flue gas
conditioning systems are estimated to be operating or are in the process of
being installed.  Flue gas conditioning is in the commercial stage.  Model
studies of anticipated precipitator performance by gas conditioning were simu-
lated through an increase in precipitator current and voltage as a result of
the conditioning.

Precipitator Performance

     The model simulations showed that permissible emissions could be achieved
by the addition of the HII or by more plate area for both the low or the high
resistivity fly ash precipitators.  SO, gas conditioning and pulse energiza-
tion would be effective for the high resistivity precipitator but could not
improve the performance of the low resistivity fly ash precipitator to meet
the permissible emission requirements (Table 3-3).

                                    275

-------
Capital Costs

     Estimates of 1980 capital costs to upgrade the two precipitators were pre-
pared following standard procedures.  Cost data for cold side precipitators
were used  to estimate equipment costs for upgrading precipitators with dif-
ferent SCA (specific collection area) values.

     Vendor-supplied equipment costs for the ionizer were used on a unit cost
basis.  Cost data for ionizer electrical components were updated to 1980 cost
levels from an earlier EPRI study and adjusted for the number of TR sets used
in the system.

     Information on cost estimates for the equipment required in the SO, gas
conditioning system was vendor-supplied.

     Cost estimates for field material and installation labor were based on
in-house experience with comparable equipment  and on published cost factors.

     Total capital Investment required to achieve the desired performance for
each upgrading alternative and 30-year levelized power costs are summarized in
Table 3-4.

     Total capital investment for each upgrading alternative was obtained by
combining costs for equipment, field material, installation, engineering, and
contingency.

     For the high resistivity fly ash application examined, the capital cost
of the High Intensity Ionizer would be substantially lower than the conven-
tional plate retrofit.  The operating cost for the HII would be higher prin-
cipally due to the cost of steam addition to the purge gas (42 percent of the
total levelized operating cost).  However, 803 conditioning and possibly pulse
energization would be more economical to achieve the desired performance level
(0.1 lb/106 Btu).

     The capital and operating cost for upgrading the low resistivity fly ash
precipitator with the High Intensity Ionizer would be higher than a conven-
tional plate retrofit.  The other alternatives, SOj conditioning and pulse
energization, could not give sufficient improvement to the performance of low
resistivity fly ash precipitator to meet the desired performance level.

Operating Costs

     The operating costs for upgrading by each of the alternatives were de-
veloped using EPRI economic premises and methodology (EPRI Technical Assess-
ment Guide PS-1201-SR).  The fixed operating cost included operating, mainten-
ance, administrative labor, and material.  Variable operating costs included
precipitator and miscellaneous power, ionizer power, steam, chemicals, etc.
Over the life of the plant, the operating costs tended to increase due to in-
flation.  A single "levelized" value was computed using the "present worth"
concept of money to represent the varying requirements for fixed and variable
costs.  A 30-year levelizatlon factor for operating and maintenance costs and
for the total capital requirement was computed on the basis of an EPRI-assumed
inflation rate and discount rate.  The yearly operating and capital costs were
                                    276

-------
converted to 30-year levelized costs and represented in terms of power cost
(mills/kwh).  Operating cost data for each of the upgrading alternatives are
also presented in Table 3-4.


              3.  A SCENARIO OF  FUTURE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

     Forecasting possible  future regulatory  changes is always difficult.  It
is particularly so at this time  because of philosophical changes occurring in
government administration  and policy.  However,  it is conceivable that exist-
ing precipitators could require  upgrading if particulate regulations became
more stringent.  For the purpose of this analysis, we have taken a scenario
where changes in regulations would impact on upgrade requirements.

Mass Emission Regulations

     The New Source Performance  Standards (NSPS) for utility precipitators
promulgated in 1980 lower  permissible particulate emissions from 0.1 lb/106
Btu heat input to 0.03 lb/106 Btu.  While existing precipitator installations
are exempted from NSPS, stricter requirements for existing precipitators could
occur as state and local regulatory agencies comply with the Clean Air Act and
Amendments in updating State Implementation  Plans (SIP's).

     We have taken a scenario wherein changes in present regulations would re-
quire existing installations to  meet the former  NSPS standard (0.1 lb/106 Btu).
In the immediate future, however, say up to  1985, we would anticipate that
only a small number of the existing utility  precipitators would have to meet
a 0.1 lb/106 Btu requirement because most state  and local regions are in reas-
onable compliance with total suspended particulate (TSP) standards.  However,
we could foresee that, by  1990,  most existing ESP's could have to meet a 0.1
lb/106 Btu emission level  as a result of changes to regulations.

Opacity Regulations

     For the purposes of this study, we assume that changes to State Implemen-
tation Plans, local regulations, and federal requirements would tighten opa-
city regulations.  Current requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments call
for State Implementation Plans to be updated by  July 1, 1982.  There already
is a trend among regulatory agencies to require  existing precipitators to meet
20% opacity as a minimum with others requiring a 10% opacity or even a clear
stack.  Many of the existing installations cannot meet a 10% opacity require-
ment, although it appears  that precipitators installed since the late 70's
are meeting 10% opacity in many  instances.

Fine Particulate Regulations

     Only one state, New Mexico, has a fine  particulate emission regulation
(particulate emissions, 2  microns or smaller, are not to exceed 0.04 lb/10
Btu).  However, we can postulate a situation where specific fine particulate
emission regulations are adopted by other states.

                                    277

-------
     As a scenario, we would forecast that existing installations would not be
subject to a federal fine particulate regulation but that some state or local
agencies would adopt fine particulate emission regulations.  For the purpose
of our analysis, we consider that a small number of the existing precipitators
would be subject to a New Mexico-type fine particulate emission regulation by
1985.  By 1990, however, a larger number of the existing installations could be
required to upgrade to meet fine particulate regulations.


             4.  ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE

     To estimate the immediate and future requirements for upgrading existing
utility precipitators, a Delphi-type survey was conducted among 10 knowledgeable
precipitator and utility representatives.  A Delphi survey seeks to obtain a
consensus on certain identified issues by reviewing the extreme positions taken
in the survey and narrowing differences of opinion.  This survey assessed the
ability of existing precipitators to meet possible future regulatory require-
ments.  Respondents were selected who, in the judgment of the authors, were
knowledgeable of the operation of fly ash precipitators and the regulatory pro-
cesses.

     Questions asked were:  Based on the interviewees' experience,  what per-
centage of the existing utility fly ash precipitators
a)  encounter high resistivity fly ash?
b)  meet their existing particulate regulations?
c)  could meet a 0.1 lb/106 Btu regulation?
d)  could meet a 0.04 lb/106 Btu (minus 2 micron)  regulation?
e)  could meet a 10% opacity regulation?

     The response (Table 4-1) was that, of the existing utility fly ash pre-
cipitator  installations,
a)  30 percent experience high resistivity fly ash
b)  75 percent meet their existing regulations
c)  45 percent could meet a 0.1 lb/10° Btu regulation
d)  30 percent could meet a 0.04 lb/106 Btu (fine  particulate)  regulation
e)  20 percent could meet a 10% opacity regulation

Impact on Precipitator Performance Requirements

     The Delphi-type survey estimated the present  level of performance of ex-
isting fly ash precipitators.  The assessment of regulations which may apply
to these precipitators ever the next 15 years established a scenario.   A com-
parison can be drawn of the current level of precipitator performance to the
potential regulation changes and a forecast made of precipitator upgrade re-
quirements .

     The following assessment is made of the number of existing utility fly
ash precipitators that would have to be upgraded as a result of projected
changes in regulations (Table 4-2).
                                    278

-------
1980-1984

     Minor changes to mass, fine participate, and opacity regulations are pro-
jected to occur.  ESP's not always in compliance, or operating under variances,
would be required to meet the existing particulate regulations on a regular
basis.  The Delphi survey estimated that 25 percent (350) of the existing pre-
cipitators would have been subject to upgrading.  Of this number, 230 would
be retired during this period for being over 30 years old.  The remaining 120
ESP's would be subject to upgrade requirements.

1985-1990

     Existing precipitators would be subject to stricter controls.   The 1981
National Council on Air Quality report to Congress expresses strong concern
over long-range transport and visibility and will precede congressional review
of the Clean Air Act and Amendments.  Changes to the Clean Air Act  and Amend-
ments cannot be forecast.  However, as a scenario, we could project that 20
percent of the then existing utility fly ash precipitators would have to be up-
graded to meet a 0.1 lb/106 Btu regulation (100 units).  The current NSPS of
0.03 lb/106 Btu would continue to apply to new installations only.

     An additional 15 percent of the existing precipitators might be subject
to upgrading to meet new fine particulate regulations (30 units).  If a 10%
opacity regulation were adopted, an additional 20 percent of the existing pre-
cipitators would require upgrading (20 units).  Thus, 45 percent of the exist-
ing precipitators were projected as subject to upgraded requirements in the
1985-1990 period (150 units).

Post-1990

     A further tightening of particulate regulations may be projected to occur.
In the post-1990 time period, 710 ESP's would still remain of the 1,400 units
existing in 1980.  One could project 300 ESP's requiring upgrading.  Of this
number, 230 units would be subject to a 0.1 lb/106 Btu regulation,  30 units
subject to fine particulate regulations, and 40 units subject to opacity regu-
lations.  This number (300) would not include units upgraded in the 1985-1990
time period, or units which were upgraded to meet fine particulate regulations
and thereby met opacity regulations.  Two hundred thirty precipitators are as-
sumed to be capable of meeting any of the hypothesized regulation modifications.


                    5.  PRECIPITATOR UPGRADE ALTERNATIVES

     Prechargers are only one of several alternatives being developed or al-
ready available which may be used to upgrade precipitators, and the High In-
tensity Ionizer is only one of several prechargers currently under development
in the United States and Japan.  Over the next 15-year period, only those al-
ternatives which are currently either at a commercial or an engineering devel-
opment stage would be considered as available for utility integration.

     Selection of the appropriate alternative to improve precipitator perfor-
mance  is site specific.  The precipitator should first be made to operate as

                                     279

-------
effectively as originally designed.  The internals must be in good shape or re-
paired; warped or misaligned plates should be straightened or replaced; rappers
made to operate properly; flow adjusted; and power supplies made fully and ef-
fectively operable.  An assessment can then be made of the performance limita-
tions of the precipitator and a recommended course of action identified.

Mass Emission Reduction

     Mass emission reduction requirements may vary substantially, from a condi-
tion where marginal precipitator performance is obtained (a regulation is met
part of the time) to a condition where the current precipitator performance is
completely inadequate.  A mass reduction requirement is considered slight when
penetration must be reduced by a factor of two.  It is considered significant
when penetration must be reduced by a factor greater than two.

     Significant reductions in penetration will most often be achieved by ad-
ding new equipment such as pulse energization, the High Intensity Ionizer or
a fabric filter, or by equipment modifications such as additional plate sur-
face capacity.

Fine Particulate

     The alternatives for upgrading existing precipitators to meet regulations
involving fine particulate fc2 microns) will probably require the use of new
technology such as pulse energization or the High Intensity Ionizer.  Fine
particulate removal will require a system which can apply sufficient forces
to the individual small particles so as to separate them from the gas stream.
Both pulse energization and the High Intensity Ionizer are intended to bring
this about.

Opacity

     All upgrading alternatives will reduce emissions to a degree, but sig-
nificant reductions in opacity will depend on the ability of the alternative
to reduce fine particulate emissions.


                     6.  FORECAST OF MARKET REQUIREMENTS

     The methods which could be used to upgrade existing precipitators  to meet
possible regulatory changes include:  additional collecting plate area, the
High Intensity Ionizer, pulse energization, or gas conditioning.  No one method
would  be expected  to be used for all situations.  However, based on the projec-
ted performance of the HII through tests made at Arapahoe, and reports  of the
performance of other upgrade methods (1,2,3), one can examine future market re-
quirements.

     To forecast the market for the High Intensity Ionizer  (HII)  through 1995,
the following assumptions were made:

o    Those precipitator installations which must upgrade to meet  current regu-
     lations will use either additional plate capacity or gas conditioning.
                                     280

-------
o    The HII and pulse energization will prove to be effective, reliable,  and
     commercially available by late 1983.  Prototype and demonstration testing
     will have been completed by 1982.

o    The HII will compete with plate addition and fabric filtration to meet
     fine particulate emission regulations.

o    The HII will compete with the addition of more plate capacity to meet 10%
     opacity regulations.

o    The HII will not compete with the addition of more plate capacity for most
     applications involving low resistivity fly ash.

     Equipment performance is only one criterion used in equipment selection.
Other criteria include cost, vendor marketing effectiveness, acceptance by in-
dustry, regulatory acceptance, and the performance and cost of competing alter-
natives.  The number of utilities which would use the High Intensity Ionizer
will depend, to a certain extent, on the number of major vendors offering  it.
Some utilities have a definite vendor preference based on previous experience
and geographical location.

     If several of the major vendors offer the HII, the number of precipitator
installations which would consider the HII would increase proportionately.
Conversely, if only one of the smaller vendors were to offer the HII, the  num-
ber of HII installations would not be as great because that vendor reaches a
lesser number of the utilities.  Thus, to be used extensively, the HII—or any
other alternative, for that matter—should be available through a significant
number of the major precipitator vendors.

     A forecast of the future of the .approximately 1,400 precipitators in  ex-
istence in 1980 is illustrated in Figure 6-1.  We anticipate that older pre-
cipitators will gradually be retired, middle-aged precipitators will be up-
graded to meet regulatory changes, and newer precipitators will not require
any modification.  The cumulative impact of these effects on the existing  pre-
cipitators is shown starting for the five-year period to 1985, the 10-year
period to 1990, and the 15-year period to 1995.  An assessment of these
changes is discussed below.

Assessment of the 1980-1995 Utility Precipitator Market

     The assessment of the upgrade precipitator market for the 1980-1995 period
is based on the following premises:

o    Precipitators are projected to have a 30-year life and will be retired  at
     a uniform rate (3.3%/year).  There are approximately 1,400 utility fly
     ash precipitator units currently Installed in the United States.

o    The Energy Use Act would preclude the use of gas or oil for new utility
     installations after 1990, placing a greater emphasis on the use of coal
     as a utility fuel.
o    Possible changes to mass, fine particulate, and opacity regulations may
     place increased performance requirements on existing precipitators.

o    By 1990, at least one other new alternative, not presently identified,
     will have been developed and used to upgrade existing precipitators.
                                    281

-------
o    New coal-fired installations will use either precipitators or fabric fil-
     ter dust collectors, with electrostatic precipitators being used in slight-
     ly more than half of the new applications.  New precipitator installations
     will also be able to incorporate the High Intensity Ionizer, other pre-
     chargers, or pulse energization in their design.

1980-1984

     Existing precipitators upgraded during this period will use proven up-
grading alternatives such as adding more plate capacity or gas conditioning.
It is estimated that a two-year evaluation period and an additional one-year
full-scale successful testing period would be required before the HII would
have demonstrated acceptable performance to the utility industry.  One or two
demonstration-type HII units may be installed during this period but a substan-
tial number of ionizer applications is not anticipated to occur.  A shorter
acceptance period is forecast for pulse energization although there may be
some question about the charging of fine particulate by pulse energization.

1985-1989

     During this period, 150 existing precipitators would require upgrading to
meet possible new emission regulations.  Approximately one-fourth of the pre-
cipitator installations (37) are estimated to encounter high resistivity fly
ash.  Upgraded precipitators will handle high resistivity fly ash by one of
three methods:  gas (803) conditioning, pulse energization, or the use of a pre-
charger such as the High Intensity Ionizer.

     The SOg gas conditioning system has already been proven commercially while
pulse energization and the HII have still to demonstrate reliable performance.
However, concern over sulfate and SOg emissions may result in SOg conditioning
systems not being universally acceptable for all high resistivity applications.
Nevertheless, it is projected that 50 percent of all high resistivity fly ash
precipitator upgrading applications would use 863 conditioning.  The other 50
percent would be divided equally between pulse energization and the High In-
tensity Ionizer.  Thus, an estimated 6.3 percent (nine) of the total high
resistivity fly ash precipitators to be upgraded during this period would use
the HII.

     The precipitator applications encountering medium or low resistivity fly
ash (113) have other upgrading alternatives available.  803 conditioning and
pulse energization are not as effective for a low resistivity ash and would
not be considered.  Installations having medium or low resistivity fly ash
could either add more plate capacity or use the HII.

     The adding of pulse energization to existing power supplies for high re-
sistivity fly ash applications could be quite attractive.  It is still to be
demonstrated, however, that sufficient useful power is developed by pulse
energization to obtain the desired upgrading performance and that the opera-
ting long-term costs are acceptable.
                                  282

-------
     It  is  forecast that the 113 existing low and medium resistivity  fly  ash
 installations would probably add additional plate capacity in 50 percent  of
 the upgrade applications.   Pulse energization would be used by 30 percent and
 the HII  by  20 percent.   The 20% share for the HII of the medium/low resistiv-
 ity fly  ash units being upgraded is equivalent to 15 percent of the total num-
 ber of precipitators.   Together with the 6.3 percent of the high resistivity
 fly ash  applications that would use the HII, approximately 20 percent of  the
 total number of precipitators being upgraded could use the HII.   Quantitative-
 ly, this would  be about 30 precipitator installations (Figure 6-1).  Assuming
 the cost of an  average HII installation for a 200-MW station to be $2.2 x 10°,
 total investment for HII installations would be $66 million x 10^ ($15.2  mil-
 lion per year).

 1990-1995

     During this time  period, it is postulated that a large number  (300)  of
 the existing fly ash precipitator installations would be subject  to opacity
 and fine participate regulations.  Precipitators erected prior  to  1960 would
 have been retired.

     Gas conditioning  systems to upgrade precipitators could decrease if regu-
 latory concern  focuses on sulfate and 803 emissions.

     With its ability  to charge fine particulate,  the HII could become an at-
 tractive method for precipitator upgrading as regulations for fine particulate
 centrol  become  prevalent.

     The existing high resistivity fly ash installations to be upgraded (25
 percent  of  total installations) would use alternatives such as pulse energiza-
 tion, gas conditioning, or the HII.  If each alternative captured an equal
 share of the high resistivity upgrade applications,  11 percent of  the total
 high resistivity upgrade applications would use the HII.

     For the medium and low resistivity fly ash precipitators subject to up-
 grade (75 percent of the total) , we postulate that  the upgrading of the medium
 and low  resistivity fly ash precipitators would be  divided  among four alterna-
 tives—the  High Intensity Ionizer, additional plate capacity, pulse energiza-
 tion, or a  fourth undefined, still to be developed  system.   Assuming 20 percent
 of these medium/low resistivity fly ash precipitators use the HII, 30 percent
 use pulse energization, and 50 percent use all other systems, then 15 percent
 of the total nuufcer would  be upgraded with the HII.   Adding the 11 percent of
 the high resistivity fly ash applications (and rounding off), we project  that
 25 percent  (75  of the  300  upgraded precipitators)  could use the HII (Figure
 6-1).  At an average cost  of $2.2 million,  a market  of $165 million for the
 High Intensity  Ionizer  could result.   Over a five-year period, this would re-
 present  an  annual market of $33 million.


                                  7.   SUMMARY

     Computer simulation studies have been made of the anticipated performance
of the HII in full-scale installations assuming charge losses noted at Arapahoe

                                     283

-------
could be overcome.   Sizing data from two existing installations were used:
one involving high resistivity fly ash and the second, low resistivity fly
ash.  Comparative capital and operating coets were also developed.  Compari-
son analyses were made with alternative methods of upgrading precipitator
performance including additional plate area,  SO, gas conditioning, and pulse
energization.

     Each of the four methods was capable of  upgrading the high resistivity
precipitator to a target emission level of 0.1 Ib/lO^ Btu.  For the low re-
sistivity precipitator, conventional plate addition and the HII were the vi-
able alternatives.

     Comparison of the capital and operating  costs for upgrading a high re-
sistivity precipitator showed 803 gas conditioning to have the lowest costs,
followed by a conventional upgrade and the HII upgrade.  Data were not avail-
able to project the cost for pulse energization.  This example of one high
resistivity precipitator is illustrative only and site-specific analyses at
other installations would still be required.   For the low resistivity pre-
cipitator, the lowest capital and operating cost could be obtained by a con-
ventional upgrade over the HII for the example selected.   Gas conditioning
or pulse energization could not meet performance requirements.

     A scenario of possible future regulatory requirements would indicate that
tighter mass emission regulations, more stringent opacity regulations and
fine particulate regulations might occur.  On this basis  the performance of
existing precipitators to meet such regulations suggests  that a substantial
number of existing units would require upgrading.  An assessment of the 1980-
1995 utility precipitator market for the HII  indicates the following:

a.   One or two demonstration-type HII units  could be Installed during the
     1980-1985 period, but a substantial number of ionizer applications is
     not anticipated to occur.

b.   During the 1985-1989 period, It is estimated that about 6 percent of the
     total number of fly ash precipitators to be upgraded would use the HII
     for high resistivity application, and 15 percent of  the total number of
     precipitators would use the HII for medium and low resistivity fly ash
     applications.   About 30 precipitator installations could be upgraded with
     the HII during this period.

c.   During the 1990-1995 time period, 11 percent of the total number of pre-
     cipitators would use the HII to upgrade  high resistivity precipitators
     and 15 percent of the total number would use the HII for low and medium
     resistivity fly ash applications.  It is estimated that roughly 25 per-
     cent of the precipitators could be upgraded during this period with the
     HII.

The HII may be in an advantageous commercial  position in the following situa-
tions :

a.   High and low resistivity fly ash upgrade applications where fine partic-
     ulate control and/or opacity are major concerns;
                                   284

-------
c.   High resistivity fly ash upgrade applications requiring significant eais-
     sion reductions.

     The HII may be in a disadvantageous commercial position in the following
situations:                                                                 6

a.   Either high or low resistivity fly ash applications needing slight emis-
     sion reductions;

b.   Upgrade applications where cost alone is the major concern;

c.   Low resistivity fly ash installations where the existing collecting sur-
     face area is too small to benefit from HII upgrading.


                                 REFERENCES

1.  Feldman, P. L., and H. I. Milde, Pulsed Energization for Enhanced Electro-
    static Precipitation in High Resistivity Applications, Symposium on the
    Transfer and Utilization of Particulate Control Technology, EPA-60017-79-
    044a, February 1979.

2.  Lederman, et al, Sodium Conditioning Aids Precipitation, Symposium on
    the Transfer and Utilization of Particulate Control Technology, EPA/DRI,
    Denver, Colorado, July 1978.

3.  Cook, R. E., Sulfur Trioxide Conditioning, Symposium on Electrostatic
    Precipitators for the Control  of Fine Particles, EPA-650/2-75-016, Janu-
    ary 1975.
                                    285

-------
                                       Table 3-1
                             PRECIPITATOR AND BOILER DATA
                                             (High Resistivity)
(Low Resistivity)
Gas and Particulate Conditions
    Average gas flow, acfm
    Gas temperature,  F
    Dust loading, gr/acf
    Fly ash resistivity, ohm-cm
    Particulate density, Ibs/ft
Geometry and ESP Performance
    SCA, ft2/!,000 cfm
    Number of fields
    Total plate area, ft
    Plate to plate spacing, Inches
    Wire to wire spacing, inches
    Operating average voltage, kv
    Operating average current, nA/cm
    Precipitator efficiency, %
Boiler Conditions (Estimated
    Boiler capacity, Mw
    Turbine heat rate, Btu/kwh
    Boiler efficiency, %
    Gross heat rate, Btu/kwh
1,200,000
225
2.91
6.0 x 1012
141.7
180
3
214,400
9
9
35.3
3.5
96.7
300
9,016
NA
NA
240,000
- 300
0.5
2.0 x 109
162.3
92
2
22,080
9
9
46.7
42.5
91.75
75
7,871
87.3
9,016
                                       Table 3-2
                           PRECIPITATOR EFFICIENCY REQUIRED
TO MEET UPGRADING REQUIREMENT
Installation
A
B
Fly Ash
Resistivity
(ohm cm)
High (6 x 101?)
Low (2 x 109)
Current
Performance
Efficiency
(Z)
96.7
91.75
Desired
Performance Level
(0.1 lb/10 Btu)
98.9
93.6
                                         286

-------
                     Table 3-3 COMPARISON OF UPGRADE PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
Precipitator
A





B




Existing
Precipitator
High Resistivity
Average voltage KV 35.3
Current nA/cm2 3.5
SCA ft2/!, 000 cfm 180
Incremental plate 	
area, ft2/103 cfm
Efficiency, % 96.7
Low Resistivity
Average voltage KV 46.7
Current nA/cm2 42.5
SCA ft2/!, 000 cfm 92
Incremental plate —
area, ft2/103 cfm
Efficiency, % 91.75
Performance Level
(0.1 lb/106 Btu)
Conventional Ionizer SO 3 Gas
Upgrade Upgrade Conditioning

57<» 45.6
1.5(2> 50.4
260 180 180
80
98.9 98.9 98.9
70(1)
2.5(2)
120 92
28
93.6 93.6 (3)

Pulse
Energizer

	
180
—
98.9

—
—
—
(3)
(1) Ionizer only.
(2) Ionizer current ma/ ionizer.
(3) Performance level efficiency not reached.
Table 3-4 PRECIPITATOR UPGRADE COST COMPARISONS
Installation
A

B

High Resistivity ESP
Capital Cost $ x 106
Levelized Operating Cost
Capital mills/kwh
Operating mills/kwh
Total Levelized Operating Cost mills/kwh
Low Resistivity ESP
Capital Cost $ x 106
Levelized Operating Cost
Capital mills/kwh
Ooeratine mills/kwh
Performance Level
(0.1 lb/106 Btu)
Conventional Ionizer SO 3 Gas
Upgrade Upgrade Conditioning
3.32 2.6 1.96
0.325 0.254 0.191
0.103 0.346 0.113
0.428 0.600 0.304
0.38 0.70 (2)
0.149 0.274
0.143 0.179

Pulse
Energizer
1.29<»
NA(1>
-
(2)
-
             Total Levelized Operating Cost
                                                mills/kwh
                                                                  0.292
                                                                              0.453
(1)  Estimated.
(2)  Efficiency  level is not achievable.
(3)  30-year  levelized  power cost.
                                                      287

-------
                    Table 4-1 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT  OF  EXISTING UTILITY FLY ASH PRECIPITATORS

N



REVIEWER
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Range
Concensus*


MEET
HANDLE HIGH EXISTING
RESISTIVITY REGULATIONS
FLY ASH (%) (%)
95
20 70
40 40-50
33 95
35 75
20 90
35 75
33 60
30 90
20 30
20-40 30-95
(%) 30 75
(Delphi Approach)


COULD MEET A
0.1 lb/106 BTU
REGULATION (%)
75
40
20
80
—
70-80
90
10
20
10
10-90
45


COULD MEET A
0.4 lb/106 BTU
(MINUS 2 MICRON)
REGULATION (%)
30
20
20
80
20
30-40
50
10
25
—
10-80
30



COULD MEET A
10% OPACITY
REGULATION (%)
20
10
10
25
35
10
50
20
10
30
10-50
20
*Highest and lowest estimates discarded.




A.
B.
C.
D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

J.

K.

L.
M.

Table 4-2 FORECAST* OF



Existing Precipitators
Units Retired (3.3%/yr)
Precipitators Subject to Upgrade
Do not Meet Existing Regulations

Would Require Upgrading

Could Not Meet 0.1 lb/106 Btu
Regulation
Would Require Upgrading

Meets F But Not 0.04 lb/106 Btu
(minus 2 micron)
Would Require Upgrading

Meet I But Not 10% Opacity

Would Require Upgrading

Total Requiring Upgrade
Meet All Requirements
TOTAL
UTILITY PRECIPITATORS REQUIRING UPGRADING

1980-
1984
1,400
230
1,170
(% of A) 25
(No.) 350
(% of D) 100,
(No.) 120^
(% of C)
(No.)
(% of F)
(No.)
(% of C)
(No.)
(% of H)
(No.)
(% of C)
(No.)
(% of J)
(No.)
120


Time Period
1985-
1990
1,170
230
940
	
—
__
1)
55
520
20
100
15
140
20
30
10
90
20
20
150




1990+ Total
940
230 690
710
__
—

	
55
390
60
230
15
110
130
30
10
70
60
40
300 570
140
1,400
  *Based on survey  of  knowledgeable precipitator specialists
(l)Excludes precipitators  scheduled for retirement.

                                                    288

-------
       ttJB
        *
        •9.9
       e».o
OO
        90.0
                   HIGH RESISTIVITY
                   INSTALLATION "A"
                      160 SCA	
COLLECTION
EFFICIENCY
   X
LOW RESISTIVITY-
INSTALLATION "B"   ^
   92 SCA    ^,.-*^wg«r. »-x
                   OVERALL
          BRECIPITATOR  EFFICIENCY
              VS.  H1I  VOLTAGE
                  4O       SO       60      TO      00
                     HIGH INTENSITY IONIZER VOLTAGE - KV
                                                           90
                                         »o



                                         to


                                         to.

                                         «0

                                         80
                                         40
                                         90
                                                                                               Vlgur* 1-2

                                                                               ESP «  HIGH  INTENSITY IONIZER
                                                                                  PARTICLE SIZE-EFFICIENCY
                                                                                                            -WITH HI!
                                                              COLLECTION
                                                              EFFICIENCY
                                                                                                             CURRENT PERFORMANCE
                                                                                                                 (ESP ONLY)
                                                                                                                 HIGH RES!ST?VITY
                                                                                                                 INSTALLATION A
                                                                                                                     ISO SCA
                                                                                        i.O
                                                                                                 I.S
                                                                                                         2.Q
                                                                      to



                                                                      to


                                                                      70

                                                                      so

                                                                      50

                                                                      4O
                                                                                                            WITH H1I
                                                              COLLECTION
                                                              EFFICIENCY
                                                                                                 CURRENT PERFORMANCE
                                                                                                     (ESP OMLY)
                                                                                                     LOW RESISTIVITY
                                                                                                     INSTALLATION B
                                                                                                          02 SCA
                                                                             I.O      I.S      E.O
                                                                          PARTICLE DIAMETER IN MICRONS
                                                                                                                        iO

-------
•*.»
•S.S
»t.o
•9.0 -

• 4.0
         LOW RESJSTiyirr
         INSTALLATION
                             —HIGH RESISTIVITY
                               INSTALLATION V
    COLLECriON
    EFFICIENCY
                             PRECIPITATOR EFFICIENCY
                                          VS.
                                         SCA
100       200      jco       400
   SPECIFIC COLLECTING AREA (SCA)
                                          aoo      coo
                                        ft'/IOOOcfm
                                                                 USiT*
                                                             Aoo
                                                                     Zoo

-------
             APPLICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVING PULSE ENERGIZATION
                              FOR PRECIPITATORS
                       PRACTICAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS

                                      By

                            Helge Hoegh Petersen
                               Preben Lausen

                            F.L. Smidth & Co. A/S
                      77, Vigerslev Alle, DK-2500 Valby
                             Copenhagen, Denmark
                                  ABSTRACT


     Performance of precipitators collecting high resistivity dust can be
improved considerably by pulse energization.  The energy consumption, however,
is a major problem for its application on large precipitators, where consider-
able amount of energy is required to  charge the precipitator capacitance to
a high pulse voltage level.  The energy conserving pulse energization system
dealt with here solves this problem,  as the energy stored in the precipitator
during the pulse and not used in the  precipitation process is recovered to be
used for the next pulse application.  Operating results and experience from
full-scale field tests over a period  of more than two years are presented.
The tests have demonstrated that the  system, utilizing high-power electronic
components, has the required degree of reliability for practical application.
Further, the obtained improvement of  precipitator performance in relation to
installation and operating costs makes it an attractive option to new precip-
itators for high resistivity dust as  well as to existing precipitators with
resistivity problems.  Based on these findings, practical and economic aspects
of installation and operation of the  system on new as well as on existing pre-
cipitator installations are discussed.

                                INTRODUCTION

     It has been known for many years that the performance of a precipitator
collecting high resistivity dust can  be improved by pulse energization.

     By superimposing short duration  high voltage pulses on the DC voltage by
means of a suitable pulse generator,  higher peak voltage is obtainable without
sparkover.  The use of pulse voltage  gives a number of advantages including
improved particle charging, higher collection field strength and better
current distribution on the collection plates (1), (2).     ,

     Further, the discharge current can be regulated independently of the pre-
cipitator voltage by variation of pulse repetition frequency and pulse height
(3).   This makes it possible to reduce the discharge current to the threshold
limit for back corona with a high resistivity dust, without reducing the pre-
cipitator voltage.  This means more favourable electrical energization for
such applications than is obtainable  with conventional DC operation, where the
                                     291

-------
current cannot be regulated independently of  the precipitator  voltage.

     Earlier pulse energization work was hampered by  the  lack  of reliable
high-power switch elements for the pulse generator.   Recent  years technical
progress has changed this situation.  Various pulse energization systems are
now under development in the U.S.A., Japan and Europe, with  some of  them at
or very close to a commercial stage.

     An inherent problem in pulse energization is the considerable amount of
energy required for repetitive charging of the precipitator  capacitance to a
high pulse voltage level.  Only a minor part of this  energy  is necessary for
the discharge current in the precipitator.  For reasons of economy,  recovery
of the surplus energy is important, particularly for  pulse energization of
large precipitators.

     Some of the pulse energization systems under development  are capable of
conserving the capacitive pulse energy by recovering  it from the precipitator
after the pulse and using it for the next pulse.  Such an energy conserving
pulse energization system developed by F.L. Smidth (3) is described  in  the
following, and the results obtained from industrial scale tests  are  presented.

           F.L. SMIDTH ENERGY CONSERVING PULSE ENERGIZATION  SYSTEM

General Principle
               -120
               -100
            Si  -80
            $
            s
3
'a.
'<3
S?
QL
               -so
               -40
               -20 -
                          Pulse repetition frequency 200 pps
                              0.5
                                                   5.5
                                      Time, ms
                Figure 1.  Precipitator voltage wave-form.
                                    292

-------
     The system is used with conventional precipitators and does not require
any special electrode arrangements.  Short duration high voltage pulses are
repeatedly superimposed on an operating DC voltage as shown in Figure 1.  The
pulse duration is within the range 50-200 Vis, and pulse repetition frequen-
cies from 25 to 400 pulses per second are used.

     The level of the DC voltage depends on dust and gas characteristics.
For high resistivity dust the DC voltage is maintained at or slightly below
corona onset in order to extinguish the corona discharge after each pulse.
This allows control of the discharge current by means of pulse height and
repetition frequency.

     Idealized wave-forms of the precipitator pulse current and voltage are
shown in Figure 2.  During the first half of the pulse time a negative cur-
rent flows from the pulse generator to the precipitator, charging the pre-
cipitator capacitance from the operating DC voltage level to the pulse peak
voltage.
                 -400
-120
                 200
                                                    100
                Figure 2.   Ideal wave-forms  of  precipitator
                           current and voltage.

     For  high  pulse  voltages only a minor part of  this  charge  is  emitted as
discharge current  during  the pulse in order to maintain a suitable collec-
tion plate current density.   The remaining  and major  part of the  charge is
returned  to the pulse generator as a reversed  current flow  during the  second
half of the pulse  time,  thus bringing the precipitator  voltage back  to the
operating DC voltage level,  refer Figure 2.

                                    293

-------
The Energy Conserving Pulse Energization System
                    DC supply
                 -^
                    Charger
1—

H








1=
—
	 ,
Tr
'i
	 1 I I 	
LOG
(
Switch
C^>PI
Diode s '••
_ .--..L
•\ „
•'C"

IJ
: Precipitator

>ulse transformer
                Figure 3.  The F.L. Smidth energy conserving
                           pulse energization system.

     Figure 3 is a basic diagram of the energy conserving pulse energization
system.  The DC operating voltage is maintained by a DC supply with a block-
ing inductor L   preventing the pulse voltage from entering the supply.  A
coupling capacitor C  blocks the DC operating voltage from the pulse trans-
former.  The pulse circuit includes a charger supplying a storage capacitor
C  , a  thyristor switch, a feed-back diode, and a series inductance L .  The
storage capacitor C , the series inductance L  together with the pulse trans-
former leakage inductance, the coupling capacitor C_, and the precipitator
capacitance C,, form a series oscillatory circuit.
             r

     The storage capacitor C  is charged to a controlled DC level by the
charger.  The thyristor switch is turned on, and the precipitator represented
by the capacitance C  is charged to the maximum pulse voltage level by the
first half period of the oscillatory current.  Because of the series oscilla-
tion,  the energy supplied to C  and not used for the corona discharge is re-
turned to CR through the feed-back diode by the current in the second half
period.  During this interval, the thyristor switch is turned off, and the
current in the pulse circuit is blocked until the next ignition of the
thyristor switch.  The returned energy is stored in C  during the interval
between the pulses and is used for the next pulse.
                                                                        2
     An industrial precipitator may have a capacitance of 30-40 pF per m
(3-4 pF per square foot) collection area.  Charging this capacitance to a
high pulse voltage level a large number of times per second requires a con-
siderable quantity of energy.  Depending on pulse voltage level and repeti-
tion frequency, the charging energy might amount to several times the energy
absorbed by the precipitator as useful corona discharge energy.  For reasons
                                     294

-------
of economy, recovery of the charging energy  is consequently extremely advan-
tageous for pulse energization of large precipitators  (4).

                            GENERAL ARRANGEMENT

     Industrial versions of the energy conserving pulse energization system
are now being manufactured in the United States as well as in Europe by manu-
facturers, who also provide field service and stock spare parts.  It is pre-
sently available in two standard unit sizes  capable of energizing a precip-
itator fie.ld or cell with a collection area  of 2500 m  (25000 square feet) up
to 3000 m  (30000 square feet), depending on unit size, gas temperature and
precipitator duct width.  Larger units, capable of energizing up to 5000 m
(50000 square feet) of collection area each, are being developed and will
become available early 1982.
          CONTROL PANEL
                                                        FLANGE
                                            DC SUPPLY     PULSE SUPPLY
                           CHARGING
                     TRANSFORMER/RECTIFIER
                    Figure 4.  Arrangement of the pulse
                               energization system.

     A system for energizing one field or cell comprises the following
equipment, refer Figure 4:

A.  A control panel containing
    - Thyristor controllers for the DC high voltage supply and pulse charger
    - storage capacitor
    - thyristor switch for firing the pulses
    - feed-back diode for returning the charge from the precipitator to the
      storage capacitor
    - series inductance for matching circuit impedance to precipitator
      capacitance

                                     295

-------
     - instruments for measuring DC voltage level, pulse peak voltage,
       precipitator current, and pulse repetition frequency
     - manual controls
     - automatic controls continuously adjusting DC voltage level, pulse
       peak voltage and pulse repetition frequency for optimum precipitator
       efficiency on basis of criteria related to control of corona discharges
       between pulses, total precipitator current, sparkover rate and spark-
       over intensity.  The automatic controls further ensure fast precipi-
       tator voltage recovery after sparkover.

 B.  A transformer/rectifier for charging of the storage capacitor to a con-
     trolled voltage level corresponding to the desired pulse peak voltage.

 C.  A pulse power supply comprising the pulse transformer and the coupling
     capacitor in a common oil tank.  The tank further contains a voltage
     divider for direct high voltage measurements.  The precipitator can be
     connected either to the pulse supply or to ground for safety, through a
     manually operated high voltage change-over switch in the oil.

 D.  A  DC high voltage supply comprising an oil emerged three phase trans-
     former/rectifier with a blocking inductor preventing the pulse voltage
     from entering the supply.  By means of a manually operated high voltage
     change-over switch in the oil, the precipitator can be connected either
     to the DC supply or to ground for safety during repairs.

     Where pulse energization systems are installed at an existing precipi-
     tator installation the existing conventional single phase transformer/
     rectifiers may be used instead of the 3 phase DC supply.  The single
     phase transformer/rectifier would have to be tied in with the controls
     for the pulse energization system.  Also a smoothing filter for reduction
     of its ripple voltage would have to be added together with the necessary
     blocking inductor to prevent the pulse voltage from entering the DC supply.

     Installation of the pulse system at existing or new precipitator instal-
lations is simple.  The pulse power supply and the DC high voltage supply may
be placed on the precipitator roof for direct connection to the field, or they
may be placed at any other suitable outdoor or indoor location in the vicinity
of the precipitator, and connected to this through high voltage busbars pro-
tected by trunking.

     Where the size of the fields or cells is relatively small two fields or
cells may be energized from the same pulse energization unit.

     The control panel requires a dust-free environment and ambient tempera-
tures maintained between 0°C (32°F) and 40°C (104°F).

     For 6 mobile test and demonstration pulse energization units, 2 of which
were manufactured in Europe and 4 in the United States, a suitable environ-
ment for the control panels was obtained by placing them in a 20' container
with filtered ventilation, and heating and cooling facilities.
                                      296

-------
     Similar control house arrangements may  be  advantageous  also  for permanent
installations, particularly at  existing precipitator  installations where
building layout makes it difficult  to  find suitable space  and  environment for
the control panels.  Further, the container  solution  has the advantage of
minimizing field wiring work and installation time.   Up to four control panels
serving four high voltage units may be placed in  one  container.

     Remote control and remote  instrumentation  is easily incorporated, either
in a separate small remote control  panel  or  built into a central  control panel
placed at any desired distance  from the pulse energization system.

                            FULL SCALE TEST  RESULTS

Precipitator for a Lime Burning Rotary Kiln

     From early 1979 full scale tests  have been carried out  on a  precipitator
dedusting the 350°C hot exit gases  from a 290t/24h lime burning rotary kiln in
Denmark.  The precipitator consists of two fields in  series  with  collection
areas of abt. 1100 m* and 1400  m  ,  respectively.   In  the first field the duct
width is 300 mm, and the discharge  electrodes are of  a rigid pin-type design.
In the second the duct width is 250 mm, and  the discharge  electrodes are of
the conventional 2.7 mm diameter helical  type.  The gas velocity  is about
0.6 m/s, giving a total treatment time of 12 seconds.
                                                                  O
     The gas volume treated in  the  precipitator is about 115,000  m /h, temp-
erature about 350°C, the water  content about 15%  by volume,  and the dust load
about 20 g/m-'.  Particle size median is about 17V-m and dust resistivity
varies from about 10^-0 to 10    ohm-cm, depending  on temperature,  raw materials
and kiln operation.

     Each of the fields can be  energized  from either  a pulse energization
system or a conventional single phase, full-wave  raw  rectified DC power supply.

     The precipitator efficiency and the  w,  migration velocity were determined
from measurements of the inlet  and  outlet dust  concentrations  and the gas
volume flow rate.  An improvement factor  was defined  as the  ratio between the
w  values for pulse and DC energization for  optimum operation  conditions.  The
results confirmed earlier findings  with a double  pipe test precipitator (3) ,
which showed that the improvement factor  was strongly dependent on the degree
of back ionization as judged from resistivity measurements and the corres-
ponding current-voltage curve for DC energization, refer the table below.
OPERATION CONDITION
No back ionization,
No back ionization,
Moderate back " ,
Severe back " ,
IQlO
1011
io12
1013
ohm-
ohm-
ohm-
ohm-
cm
cm
cm
cm
w, IMPROVEMENT
k
1.
1.
1.
2.
1
2
6
2
FACTOR




                                     297

-------
     During 1980 the pulse system has been running continuously on the first
section of the precipitator with a total of about 6500 hours of operation
without operation failure or need for service, and thus proved that the system
has the required degree of reliability for practical application.

Precipitator for a 4-Stage Preheater Kiln

     Two mobile pulse units have been operated for about 3 months on a preci-
pitator for a 2800 t/24 h, 4-stage preheater cement kiln with raw mill in
Spain.  The installation has a conditioning tower in parallel with the raw
mill in order to maintain a gas temperature of about 150°C, which is necessary
to prevent back ionization (5).  The precipitator has two chambers each with
two fields in series with a collection area of about 2500 m^ per field.

     The gas volume treated is about 390000 m3/h, and the dust load about
30 g/m3.  Particle size median is about 5jmm.

     The degree of back ionization can be controlled simply by reducing the
water injection in the conditioning tower, which results in higher tempera-
ture, reduced moisture content, and higher dust resistivity.

     One pulse unit supplies one field, and each of the four fields can be
connected to a pulse unit.  The dust emission can be measured at each of the
chambers separately, and the installation thus makes it possible to test
performance of pulsing on the two inlet fields, the two outlet fields, and
the two fields in one chamber.

     During the tests the temperature has been varied between 140 and 200°C,
the moisture content in the range 15-8% by volume, and the dust resistivity
from 10^-1 to 5-10^-  ohm-cm.  This resistivity is measured on samples of dust
scraped off the collection electrodes.  Samples from the dust extraction
equipment show resistivities about one decade lower.

     Through these ranges of variation the w,  improvement factor remained
constant at about 2 calculated for the pulse energized part.
                                   ECONOMICS
Capital Expense for New Installations

     Pulse energization can be used either to improve the performance of an
existing precipitator, or to reduce the required collection area for a new
precipitator installation for a high resistivity application.

     The w,  improvement factor used above is useful, since the necessary col-
lection area is inversely proportional to w, .  The earlier showed relation-
ship between w,  improvement factor and resistivity level found for the lime
kiln precipitator can be transformed into a set of curves as shown in
                                     298

-------
Figure 5, which illustrates the saving in collection area for pulse energi-
zation compared with DC energization.
                        3001	
                          10
   1011        10
Resistivity, ohm • cm
                                                  12
10
                                                             13
                        Figure 5.   Relative collection area for
                                   DC and pulse energization.

     The  equipment cost on installed basis of the described type  of pulse
 energization  system is presently  in the order of $6 per square  foot of  collec-
 tion area energized.   Further development of  the technology,  larger units and
 the general downward  trend in prices of high  power electronic switch  elements
 can be expected  to lower this figure in the future.   However, already at a
 cost of $6 per square foot of plate area energized pulse energization becomes
 economically  interesting for new  installations even at medium level resisti-
 vities producing moderate w,  improvement factors.

     This can be shown by the following simple way of reasoning with  an im-
 provement factor of 1.5 as example.  The cost of pulse energizing two square
 feet plate area  would be 2 x 6 =  $12.   With an improvement factor 1.5 the two
 square feet of pulse  energized plate area would perform as well as 2  x  1.5 = 3
 square feet of plate  area energized with conventional DC.   There  is thus saved
 one square foot  of plate area by  using $12 for the pulse energization system.
 With costs of new  large precipitator installations going as high  as $22 per
 square foot of collection area on installed basis for a 500 MW  unit it  is
 seen that pulse  energization has  a considerable potential for savings with
 high resistivity fly  ash.

 Upgrading  of  Existing Installations

     For  upgrading of older precipitators pulse energization, where applicable,
may be preferred to 803 conditioning for its  simplicity, low power requirements,
high reliability and  low maintenance costs characteristic of solid-state TR sets.
                                      299

-------
     For a backfit situation, assume a cold side precipitator on a 500 MW
(net) plant with a SCA=300 square feet per 1000 ACFM achieving 97% efficiency
on a high resistivity ash.  In such cases an 803 conditioning system having an
enhancement factor of 2 on migration velocity w^ might be a logical choice to
achieve 99.4% efficiency.  Pulse energization with a similar enhancement
factor would also be a very viable alternative.  Either of these would be much
less expensive than adding an additional precipitator with SCA = 300 to achieve
about 99.4% efficiency.  Some cost comparisons for this case may be noted as
follows; (1.9 million ACFM at 300°F).

                Capital Expense

                New Backfit ESP at $22/sq.ft. installed   $12.5 million

                Add Pulse Energization at $6/sq.ft.       $3.42 million

                SO,, System installed - S burner type      $2.8  million


     Annual power costs, however, would be much less for the pulse system than
for 803 conditioning.  This is in particular the case for the energy conser-
ving system dealt with here.  During operation on medium resistivity dust at
150°C with a collection plate current density of 10/XA per square foot the
power supplied from the mains to the DC as well as the pulse unit was measured
to about 0.5 watts per square foot of collection plate area.  At a price of
$0.04/kWh for 7000h operation this is about $80,000.

     This shall be compared with annual operating cost of $417,000 for the S0~
conditioning composed of $210,000 for power to the precipitator and sulfur at
$50,000 ($0.032/Tn. coal burned) and incremental maintenance, labor, utilities
and overhead of about $157,000.

     Other proprietory chemical conditioning systems, where applicable, have
very low capital costs, but cost of chemicals may be high - typically
$0.3-0.5/Tn. coal burned.


                                 CONCLUSIONS

     Full scale field tests with the energy conserving pulse energization
system described in the paper have shown that the performance of precipitators
collecting high resistivity dust can be improved considerably by pulse energi-
zation.  The improvement results in capital savings from reduced size require-
ments for new installations, and in upgraded performance of existing install-
ations.

     The tests have demonstrated that the automatic controls of the system
are able to maintain a stable operation and to adjust continuously the DC
voltage level, pulse peak voltage, and pulse repetition frequency for optimum
precipitator performance under the various operation conditions experienced.

     Further, a test with continuous operation of a unit for about one year
has shown that the equipment has the required degree of reliability for
                                     300

-------
practical application.  The pulse  energization  system  is now being manufac-
tured in the United States as well as  in Europe.

     The practical arrangement  of  the  system gives  an  easy installation with
a high degree of flexibility on new as well  as  on existing precipitators.  The
high voltage DC and pulse supplies may be  placed on the precipitator roof or
at any other suitable  location  in  the  vicinity  of the  precipitator.  For old
installations the existing DC high voltage supply may  be used.  The control
panels require a dust-free environment and suitable ambient temperatures.  If
desired, the panels can be placed  in a container delivered with the system.

     Comparison of installation costs  for  new precipitators shows that even at
medium resistivity levels, where only  moderate  w, improvement factors are
attained, pulse energization with  this system is an interesting alternative to
a large precipitator with conventional DC  energization.

     The advantage is  even more pronounced for  upgrading of existing precipi-
tators, where the installation  costs for additional collection area in an
example far exceed the costs of the alternative pulse  solution.

     In the latter case an SO,,  conditioning  system  giving a similar enhance-
ment factor as  the pulse  solution  may  be installed  at  somewhat lower costs
than for the pulse system.

     A comparison of  the  operating costs for the  two solutions, however, shows
that pulse energization with  the energy  conserving  pulse energization system
can be performed at much  lower  annual  costs  than SO,, conditioning.
                                      301

-------
                                 REFERENCES
1.   Lausen,  P.:         Improved Precipitation by Pulse Energization.   Proc.
                       of US-Japan Seminar on Measurement and Control of
                       Particulates Generated from Human Activities,  Nov.
                       1980,  Kyoto, Japan.

2.   Joergensen,  H.J.,   Influence on Particle  Charging  of Electrical Para-
    J.T.  Kristiansen   meters at DC and  Pulse Voltages.   3rd  Symposium on
    and P.  Lausen:      The Transfer and  Utilization of Particulate  Control
                       Technology.   March 1981,  Orlando,  Florida, U.S.A.
3.  Petersen, H.Hoegh
    and P.  Lausen:
4.  Lausen, P.:
5.
                   Precipitator Energization Utilizing an Energy
                   Conserving Pulse Generator.   Proc.  of  2nd Symposium
                   on The Transfer and Utilization of  Particulate
                   Control Technology.  July 1979,  Denver,  Colorado, U.S.A.

                   Energy Considerations on Pulse  Energization of
                   Electrostatic Precipitators.  Proc.  of US-Japan
                   Seminar on Measurements  and Control of Particulates
                   Generated from Human Activities, Nov.  1980,  Kyoto,
                   Japan.

Petersen, H.Hoegh:  Electrostatic Precipitators for Cement Mills,  Kilns,
                   and Coolers - Control of Operating  Conditions  During
                   Transition Periods.  Presented  at IEEE Cement  Industry
                   Technical Conference.  May 1978, Roanoke,  Virginia,
                   U.S.A.
                                    302

-------
                     SO? REMOVAL BY DRY INJECTION AND
                       SPRAY ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES'

       By:   Edward L. Parsons, Jr.
            Buell Emission Control Division
            Envirotech Corporation
            Lebanon, Pennsylvania  17042

            Vladimir Boscak
            Chemico Air Pollution Control Corporation
            Envirotech Corporation
            New York, New York   10001

            Theodore G. Brna
            Industrial  Environmental Research Laboratory
            United  States Environmental  Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, North Carolina   27711

            Ronald  L. Ostop
            Department  of Public Utilities
            City of Colorado  Springs
            Colorado Springs, Colorado  80903

                                  ABSTRACT

     The initial phases  of EPA-sponsored test programs  on dry injection and
spray absorption were executed from December 1979 through July 1980 at
Buell's Colorado Springs test facilities and established a solid  base of
nrocess design data.  This paper presents the results of EPA-funded follow-
u^udies Dieted in October  1980,  which addressed iss-* °f J^*^^
disposal for both dry FGD methods, and further *xP^es parametric °Ptlmlza
tion of the more commercially important spray absorption process.




characteristics.
hot gas bypass reheat  on  spray     ""JJJeltSne were evaluated and
 testing.

                                 INTRODUCTION
      The  technical feasibility °~f^r £™      fquel  hL'bfen
 fired boilers by dry injection and spray a»sorpc     ±  x 4llttle  has  been
 widely demonstrated la P^^-f^^^fp^ducrSracterLation and/or
 published,  however, pertaining to ^te pro auc         process. For dry
 environmentally acceptable disposal Method 8 «*e^ ben£   successful  demon-
 injection or spray absorption V^ff^tant "o rhe future development


                                                       regains to be
                                      303

-------
in scientifically controlled tests.  In EPA-sponsored tests conducted at
Envirotech's Lebanon R&D laboratory and Battelle's Columbus Laboratories,
representative samples of spray absorption and dry injection waste product
obtained from Buell's Colorado Springs pilot plant were subjected to various
stabilization processes and were evaluated for environmental acceptability
in simulated landfill disposal.

     With 13 utility systems totaling over 4000-MW capacity on order, spray
absorption FGD stand-s on the threshold of its first generation of large-
scale commercial application.  However, even as the startup dates for major
installations in the 400- to 600-MW class approach, much remains to be
investigated in regard to flue gas pretreatment, the effects of ash chemistry,
and alternate sorbent types and preparation methods.  These and other issues
were pursued in an EPA-funded follow-up study completed in October 1980,
which was a continuation of the original spray absorption test program
conducted by Buell and Anhydro A/S at their Colorado Springs test facility (1),
The 2-MW equivalent pilot plant used in both programs was installed in
slipstream configuration at the inlet of the 189 m3/s (400,000 acfm) Buell
reverse air filter operating on Boiler No. 6 of the City of Colorado Springs'
Martin Drake Station, a 85-MW pulverized coal-fired steam generator burning
low-sulfur Northwest Colorado coal.

                 SPRAY ABSORPTION WASTE PRODUCT STUDIES

     Relative ease of handling and disposal of spray absorption waste
products is widely claimed as an advantage over wet FGD processes, but is
supported by little in the way of published geo-technical data.  It does
seem reasonable that the mixture of fly ash and calcium salts would undergo
pozzolanic reactions after mixing with water and landfilling, rendering the
material acceptable from the standpoint of unconfined compressive strength,
permeability, and leachability.  To confirm this hypothesis, representative
samples of lime-based spray absorption waste product from the Colorado
Springs pilot plant were tested at Envirotech's R&D laboratory in Lebanon, PA.

     Waste product samples were obtained from the absorber and baghouse
hoppers for  test points representing straight-through (no waste product
recycle) operation at a low stoichiometric ratio as well as a high stoichio-
metric ratio run with 50 percent recycle of the total waste product.  The
results of chemical analysis of the samples are presented in Table 1 and
indicate 20  to  25 percent calcium species for the low stoichiometry case
(Sample  1) and  40 to 50 percent for the higher stoichiometry (Sample 2)-

             TABLE 1.  CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF DRY FGD WASTE PRODUCT
                      FROM SPRAY ABSORPTION PILOT PLANT

                            Sample  1             Sample 2
                       Low Stoichiometry     High Stoichiometry
                        Straight Through         50% Recycle

     Constituent         Percent Weight        Percent Weight
                       Absorber  Baghouse    Absorber  Baghouse

     Solids              99.9       99.7        96.8      98.5
     CaSOo-1/2  H20        3.9       2.3         19.2      20.8
     CaS04'2 H20          1.2       2.2         9.3        2.3
     CaC03               10.7       10.7         9.9      11.9
     Mg                   0.9       1.0         0.2        3.0
     Acid  Insoluble      80.4       77.5         59.6      62.1


                                    304

-------
     The samples were mixed with varying amounts of water, and simulated
landfill specimens were prepared using a Harvard miniature compactor and
cured in constant humidity chambers.  For  the high stoichiometry case,
baghouse and absorber waste product  samples were prepared separately; for
the low stoichiometry case, equal  parts of baghouse and absorber waste
product were mixed.  Specimens were  tested for unconfined compressive strength
and permeability after two different curing periods.  The results of these
tests are summarized in Table 2 and  show that the highest strength and lowest
permeability coincided for all samples:  80 percent solids gave the best
results for Sample  1 and  75 percent  solids was best for Sample 2.  The results
indicate ample compressive strength  for the support of men and equipment
(19.5 tonne/m2), and the  permeability is acceptable
        TABLE  2.   UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND  PERMEABILITY FOR
                  SIMULATED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF  DRY FGD WASTE PRODUCT
 Percent  Solids
SAMPLES FROM SPRAY ABSORPTION PILOT PLANT


                        1SL       Zl       -§°-

 Compressive Strength, tonne/m2(ton/ft2)
   Sample  1  - Mixture of spray absorber
   and  baghouse waste product

     After 7 days                        32.8
                                        (3.36)
     After 26 days                       31.5
                                        (3.23)
   Sample  2 - Spray absorber waste product

     After 10 days

     After 21 days

   Sample  2 - Baghouse waste product

     After 10 days

     After 21 days
        20.9
       (2.14)
        54.0
       (5.53)


        27.5
       (2.82)
        29.7
       (3.04)


        219
       (22.4)
        284
       (29.1)
                     Permeability, 106cm/s(10~6 in./sec)
   Sample 1 - Mixture of spray
   absorber and baghouse waste product

     After 7 days

     After 26 days
 60
(24)
 45
(18)
   Sample 2 - Spray absorber waste product

     After 10 days

     After 21 days

   Sample 2 - Baghouse waste product

     After 10 days
                                  25
                                 (9.8)
                                  9.3
                                 (3.7)
          2.3
         (0.91)
          2.0
         (0.79)
          0.25
         (0.10)
         (0.26)
                                         39.6
                                        (4.06)
                                         61.7
                                        (6.32)


                                         19.7
                                        (2.02)
                                         17.7
                                        (1.81)

                                         84.0
                                        (8.60)
                                         101
                                        (10.4)
 10
(3.9)
 7.1
(2.8)
                                           5.1
                                          (2.0)
                                           3.4
                                          (1.3)
                                           2.0
                                          (0.79)
                                          (0.67)
                             5
         24.0
         (2.46)
         29.4
         (3.01)


         18.1
         (1.85)
         11.1
         (1.14)


         118
         (12.1)
         106
         (10.9)
 44
(17)
 18
(7.1)
          9-7
         (3.8)
          10
         (3.9)
          3.5
         (1.4)
         (1.4)
                                      305

-------
     Table 3 summarizes the results of leachate tests performed on equal
mixtures of absorber and baghouse waste product using EPA's extraction
procedure (Proposed Rules Part 250 - Hazardous Waste Guidelines and Regula-
tions, Federal Register, Volume 43, No. 243, December 18,  1978).  The
results show that the levels of mercury approximate the proposed level  for
hazardous waste, but that the seven other heavy metals are far below the
proposed levels.  It should be pointed out, however, that  the extraction
tests were performed on the "as received" dry powder samples which had  not
undergone pozzolanic (hydraulic cement forming) reactions.  Thus, the expected
contaminant levels from an actual landfill would be lower.

             TABLE 3.  LEACHATE ANALYSIS FROM EPA'S EXTRACTION
                       PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON "AS RECEIVED" DRY
                       FGD WASTE FROM SPRAY ABSORPTION PILOT
                                          SPRAY ABSORBER AND
                       BAGHOUSE WASTE PRODUCT
                             Extract Sample            Proposed Level
     Contaminant             _ mg/1 _            _ mg/1 _
                         Sample 1     Sample 2

     Arsenic              0.012        0.015                 0.5
     Barium               0.029        0.117                10.0
     Cadmium              0.006        0.012                 0.1
     Chromium             0.009        0.021                 0.5
     Lead                 0.015        0.027                 0.5
     Mercury              0.017        0.021                 0.02
     Selenium             0.006        0.016                 0.1
     Silver               0.001        0.011                 0.5

                    DRY INJECTION WASTE PRODUCT STUDIES

     Spent material consisting of fly ash and sodium salts from the dry
injection FGD pilot program at Colorado Springs' Martin Drake Station (1,2)
was analyzed to establish a cost-effective process for the environmentally
acceptable disposal of the waste materials.  In this study, Battelle's
Columbus Laboratories evaluated the insolubility of sodium salt wastes after
treatment.  The treatment involved pelletizing the wastes after addition of
about 5 percent lime and sintering the pellets at a temperature up to 1000°C
(1843°F) while noting S02 evolution.  Testing of the stabilized pellets as
aggregates for leaching and strength characteristics was also performed.
Based on these analyses, an optimum process, balancing S02 evolution during
curing and leaching of salts from the stabilized pellets, was defined and
costed.  The economic analysis for the waste stabilization process used the
premises given in the most recent TVA/EPA report for a typical Upper Great
Plains 500-MW power plant (3).  This analysis indicates that with pelletiza-
tion and sintering of the sodium salt wastes the dry injection FGD process
has a higher cost per kW than lime-based spray absorption when waste
disposal costs are included.

                      SPRAY ABSORPTION PARAMETRIC TESTS

Pilot Plant Description

     The slipstream pilot plant used for the follow-on spray absorption
tests was essentially the same as described previously (1), except that a
spray system and a powder injection system were added upstream of the
absorber for pretreatment of the gas with water sprays and/or injection of
additional fly ash.  The 3.8-m (12.5-ft) diameter Anhydro spray absorber had


                                     306

-------
    «n,"P A  ?-£f  4™ ?,/?  (85°° acfm)  at  optimum  (10-s)  residence  time and
r   ??o PEh  WK   x 3°^   £4°~hp) belt-driven Anhydro  centrifugal  atomizer.
Gas from the absorber discharge  was  directed  through ductwork designed  to
rer!rLre?eaf uy.e"h?r absorber or  preheater bypass gas prior  to  entering a
reverse air fabric  filter  equipped with  full-size (0.305-m diameter  x 9.30 m
long (1-ft diameter x 30.5 ft  long)) Teflon-coated  fiberglass filter bags.
Lime slurries were  prepared  using a  full-scale commercial  package-type  lime
storage  handling,  and slaking system, and  recycle  slurries were prepared by
hand and agitated in a 1325-1  (350-gal.)  tank.  Lime and recycle slurries were
circulated to their points of  application by  independent flooded loops, and
the process flow of each slurry  was  automatically controlled by a  variable
speed progressing cavity slurry  pump.  An S02 vaporizing and injection  system
enabled spiking the slipstream gas flow  up  to a level  of 2500 ppm  SO?,  and a
??o!r7onoit  heat exchan§er  allowed  slipstream gas  preceding by as  much as
44 C (.80 F).  The pilot plant  was fully  instrumented to measure SOo  con-
centrations, gas and slurry  flow rates,  temperatures,  and  pressures.  All
instrument channels were scanned, data were converted  to engineering units,
and all data were printed  on both an instantaneous  and time-averaged basis by
a Monitor data logger.

Alkaline Fly Ash

     Since the Martin Drake  Station  burns a northern Colorado coal with low
available alkalinity when  slurried (0.4  to  0.6 percent expressed as  Ca(OH)2),
the effect of alkaline ash could be  investigated only  by introducing such ash
into the slipstream gas flow.  A supply  of  moderately  alkaline Texas lignite
ash was obtained from the  Monticello Station  of Texas  Utilities Services to
study'the effect of ash alkalinity.   The  available  alkalinity of this ash
when slurried is about 2.5 percent alkalinity (expressed as Ca(OH)2).   The
total alkaline content of  this ash is given in Table 4.

     The alkaline fly ash  was  pneumatically injected into  the slipstream
flow upstream of the absorber  at a rate  of  0.080 kg/m^ (3.5 gr/ft*) of  flue
gas.  Performance tests were run at  various approaches to  saturation tempera-
ture at the absorber outlet, with and without waste product recycle, to
assess the impact of ash alkalinity.  In  Figure 1,  the results of  these tests
are compared with the lime data  obtained  with nonalkaline  ash in the original
spray absorption test program  (1).   Since the FGD reactions in lime-based
spray absorption take place  only in  an aqueous  medium, the alkaline ash would
be expected to have little or  no effect  on  straight-through performance.
This is borne out by Figure  1.   For  the  same  reason, recycle performance is
noticeably better than without recycle because  utilization of ash alkalinity
made available in the recycle  slurry provides a benefit over a nonalkaline
ash.
     Component

        SiOo
        A1203
        Fe203
        Ti02
                TABLE 4.  ANALYSIS OF TEXAS LIGNITE ASH FROM
                          TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES' MONTICELLO STATION
        Na20
Percent Weight

     60.05
     21.91
      3.09
      1.61
      0.10
      0.31
      0.46
Component

K20
Li20
CaO
MgO
LOI*
Undetermined
Percent Weight

     0.89
     0.02
     8.87
     2.04
     0.10
     0.55
     *Loss on ignition
                                     307

-------
Absorber Inlet Prequench

     Diffusion of S02 into the sorbent droplets was  shown to be rate-
controlling for SC>2 removal across the absorber (1).   Since  SC>2 must  diffuse
counter to water vapor evolving from the droplet surface,  greater 809 mass
transfer would be expected if the initial water evaporation  rate could  be
retarded.  Prequenching the absorber inlet gas  flow with water  sprays would
reduce the initial driving forces for the evaporation rate as decreased
temperature of the flue gas gives a lower gas-liquid  temperature differential,
while higher gas moisture reduces the vapor pressure-partial pressure differ-
ential.  Both of these forces tend to reduce the evaporation rate.  However,
prequench reduces the percent of total water evaporated  which passes  through
the absorber atomizer in the process, and since there is an  upper limit on
the solids concentration which can be used for  lime and  recycle slurries, the
ability of the system to utilize recycle is effectively  reduced.   Thus  for a
net benefit, prequench must more than balance the loss of recycle capacity it
entails.

     Performance tests were run using a spray system  to  prequench the absorber
inlet gas from its normal temperature of about  163 to 149°C  (325 to 300°F)
and 135°C (275°F) by means of water sprays.  The results of  these tests are
compared to the lime data in Figure 2,  which indicate only a very slight
benefit due to prequench at 135°C (275°F), well within the "noise" level of
the data.  Since about 25 percent of the total  water  must be diverted to the
sprays to get the 135°C (275°F) temperature,  the capacity to recycle  is
seriously reduced.  Thus, it appears that prequench offers no advantage to
the spray absorption process.

Lime With Adipic Acid Additive

     Adipic acid was tested as a means of increasing  the rate of dissolution
of Ca(OH)2 in the lime slurry and thus improving SO?  removal.   The results
of tests conducted with 1500 and 3000 ppm adipic acid in the lime slurry are
compared to the lime data in Figure 2.   A significant benefit was realized
only with recycle and 3000-ppm adipic acid.  A  greater effect would be
expected with recycle since recovery of residual adipic  acid in the waste
product will increase the total adipic acid concentration in the slurry
system.  It is also reasonable to suppose that  a sufficiently high level of
adipic acid will reduce the recycle slurry pH to the  level where alkalinity
in the waste product will have increased availability.  The  level of  benefit
shown merits further investigation of the effect of adipic acid on the  lime-
based spray absorption process, including cost  impacts.

Dolomitic Lime

     In some spray absorption applications, particularly in  the Northeast,
a dolomitic lime may be more readily available  than high calcium lime,  and
thus would be desirable as a sorbent, provided  that reasonable  performance
was obtainable.  This would be a problem with most sources of dolomitic
lime, since magnesium oxide is usually "hard-burned"  in  the  calcining
process, and therefore will not explosively slake to  form the highly  reactive
lime slurry needed for best results in spray absorption  FGD.  A commercial
soft-burned dolomitic lime was used in the tests described here.

     Dolomitic lime requires special slaking methods  because of the unusual
slaking characteristics of MgO.  Slaking water  must be preheated to 77°C
(170°F) to obtain the optimum slaking temperature range  of 88 to 93°C (190
to 200°F) at a water-to-lime ratio of 4:1,  and  slaker residence time  must be
extended to at least 30 minutes to allow a complete slaking  reaction  to

                                    308

-------
occur.  Under these optimum conditions, an  extremely  thixotropic lime slurry
is produced which requires about double the agitator  power of a normal lime
slurry of the same solids concentration.  The results of a straight-through
performance test are compared with  the lime data base in Figure 3 and
indicate performance essentially equivalent to high calcium lime for a 11 to
17°C (20 to 30°F) approach to saturation  at the absorber outlet.  Due to the
hydroscopic nature of  the magnesium sulfites and sulfates in the waste
product, a minimum approach to  saturation of 14°C  (25°F) is recommended to
obtain dry powder.  It is emphasized that these results were obtained with a
soft-burned dolomitic  lime and  that the normal hard-burned variety would
likely produce less satisfactory results.

Limestone with Prequench and Adipic Acid

     Further attempts  were made in  this test program  to improve the poor SC>2
removal results obtained in the original  test program with limestone slurries.
Differing concentrations of adipic  acid,  recycle of waste product, and
prequench were all tried with disappointing results.  The best performance
results for 200 to 500 ppm S02  at the absorber inlet  and a 14°C (25°F)
approach are plotted in Figure  4.   These  data show that S(>2 removal is
severely rate-limited  by the slow reaction  with CaC03 and thus increasing
stoichiometry has little or no  effect on  S02 removal. Further tests were
run at  1000 ppm S02 with worse  results.   The highest  S02 removal was observed
at the  lowest SC>2 concentration (214 ppm),  which further confirms that
reactions with CaC03 are rate-limiting.

Trona

     Attempts were made to improve  the  trona results  presented earlier (1)
by means of partial  recycle of  the  waste  product.  Due to the very high
reactant utilization,  little or no  performance improvement was achieved.

Hot Gas Bypass Reheat

      Reported test  results  (1)  establish  the importance of operating at an
exit  gas temperature from  the  spray absorber as close as possible (about
11°C  (20°F))  to  the  adiabatic  saturation  temperature  to attain the optimum
S02 removal efficiency.  Yet, many  spray  absorption  system specifications
require baghouse  inlet temperatures as  much as 44°C  (80°F) higher than
saturation  temperature.  Hot gas  bypass reheat is  often the most cost-
effective means  of  accomplishing  the reheat but entails the  loss of S02
removal efficiency  due to  bypassing part  of the flue  gas around the absorber.
For reheat  up  to  about 28°C  (50°F)  above  the  saturation temperature, this is
the only penalty  paid  for  reheat  as the percentage S02 removal across the
baghouse is essentially unchanged.   Higher  levels  of  reheat, however, reduce
S09 removal in  the  baghouse  as  well and,  thus, impose a double penalty.  With
reheat  of  42  to  47°C (75 to  85°F)  above saturation,  the baghouse flange-to-
flange  SO?  removal  percentage  is  reduced  to 20 percent of the value which
would  be experienced with no  reheat.  Apparently,  the extreme degrees of
reheat  dry  out  the  residual moisture in the sorbent  particles leaving the
absorber to the  point  that  the reaction rate  with  S02 in  the filter cake  is
substantially  reduced.

                                 CONCLUSIONS

      The series  of  follow-up  tests  described  in  this paper was  undertaken
to  resolve  issues of waste product  disposal and  process  optimization.   A
technically feasible,  although economically unattractive,  disposal method
was demonstrated  for dry injection waste product,  and the  applicability of


                                     309

-------
conventional fly ash disposal methods to spray absorption waste product was
confirmed.  Alkaline fly ash was found to have a beneficial effect on spray
absorption process efficiency when recycle was used.   Soft-burned dolomitic
pebble lime was found to be an acceptable reagent if  the special requirements
for its use can be met.  Adipic acid additive to lime slurry was found to
improve performance when used at the 3000-ppm level and with waste product
recycle.  Prequench of the absorber inlet gas with water spray was found to
be relatively ineffective in improving SO? removal with either lime or
limestone sorbent.  The low levels of performance for limestone sorbent
reported earlier were not improved by recycle,  higher stoichiometry,  or
higher levels of adipic acid additive.  Recycle tests with trona sorbent
failed to improve upon results previously observed for straight-through
operation.

                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     The authors acknowledge with appreciation the contributions of Edward
Tomeo, James Utt, and Thomas Griffen of Buell/Envirotech,  and Fritz Paulsen
of Anhydro A/S for their assistance in the collection and  reduction of the
data presented here.  This work was supported under EPA Contract No.  68-02-
3119, Mod. 3 and with the cooperation of the  City of  Colorado Springs.

                                 REFERENCES

1.   E. L. Parsons, Jr., L. F. Hemenway, 0. T.  Kragh,  T. G.  Brna,  and R.  L.
     Ostop, "S02 Removal by Dry FGD," presented at the U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency's Sixth FGD Symposium,  Houston,  TX,  October 1980.

2.   D. A. Furlong, T. G. Brna, and R. L.  Ostop,  "SO?  Removal Using Dry
     Sodium Compounds," presented at the AIChE  89th National Meeting,
     Portland, OR, August 1980.

3.   T. A. Burnett, K. D. Anderson,  and R. L.  Torstrick, "Spray Dryer FGD:
     Technical Review and Economic Assessment,"  presented  at the U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency's Sixth  FGD Symposium,  Houston,  TX,
     October 1980.
                                   310

-------
  3.0-
                        LEAST SQUARES FIT FOR LIME DATA BASE,
                        INLET PPM S02 =  1000
  2.0-
       E = S02 REMOVAL FRACTIOM
   1.0-
                                       	 50% RECYCLE
                                             STRAIGHT
                                       	 THROUGH
                                  SYMBOL    tp  F   RECYCLE?
                                   o
                                   a
                                   A
20      NO

20      YES

30      NO

30      YES

40      NO

40      YES
                      1.0               2.0

                       STOICHIOMETRIC RATIO
                                                      3.0
Figure 1.   Comparison of SC>2 removal data for
             lime  with  injection of  3.5 gr/ACF
             alkaline ash  (see Table 4) with
             lime  data  base,  at different  values
             of approach temperature,  tp.   All
             data  for 1000 ppm SO2 at inlet and
             10 second  residence time.
                                                                  3.0-
                                                                  2.fi-
                                                                  1.0-
                                          LEAST SQUARES FIT FOR LIME DATA BASE,
                                          INLET PPM S02 = 1000, tp = 2QOF
                                                                                          RECYCLE
                                                                       E = S02 REMOVAL FRACTIOM
INLET  F  RECYCLE7
 300     MO

        NO

        YES

        YES


       RECYCLE?
        NO

        YES

        NO

        YES
1500

3000

3000
                                          1.0              2.0
                                            STOICHIOMETRIC RATIO
                                                                                                                      3 0
                        Figure  2.  Comparison of  SO2 removal  for  lime
                                    with prequench,  recycle and adipic
                                    acid additive  to lime data base.
                                    All data  for 1000 ppm SO2  at inlet,
                                    approach  temperature,  tp = 20°F,
                                    and 10 second  residence time.

-------
U>
I—l
K5
                          LEAST SO.UARES FIT FOR
                          LIME DATA BASE (HIGH CALCIUM) STRAIGHT
                          1.0              2.0
                            STOICHIOMETRIC RATIO
                                                                      1.0-
                                                                      0.5-
     SYMBOL
       O
       €
                                                                        2.0
                                                                                 50*
NO

NO
NO

YES
YES

MO

YES
                   INLET
                   QUENCH
           RECYCLE  TO 275°F
NO

NO
NO

NO
NO

YES

YES
             PPM
             ADIPIC
             ACID
                          1500
                          3000

                          1500
                          3000

                          1500

                          1500
                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                          S02 REMOVAL FRACTION
                   3.0              4.0
                     STOICHIOMETPIC RATIO
                                                                                                                        5.0
    Figure 3.   Comparison of  SC>2 removal data for
                 soft-burned dolomitic  lime with
                 high  calcium lime data base, with
                 approach temperature,  tp = 20°F and
                 30°F.   All data for  straight through
                 operation and  10 second residence
                 time.
Figure 4.  SC>2 removal data  for Q4  grind lime-
            stone with prequench, recycle,  and
            adipic acid additive.  All data
            for 200 to 500 ppm S02 at inlet
            and 10 second residence  time.
            Approach  temperature, tp = 25°F.

-------
                   DRY SCRUBBING SO  AND PARTICULATE CONTROL

                         By:  Nicholas J. Stevens
                              Ghassem B. Manavizadeh
                              George W. Taylor
                              Michael J. Widico

                           Research-Cottrell, Inc.
                        Somerville, New Jersey  08876

                                   ABSTRACT

     In dry SO  scrubbing, the spray dryer and fabric filter are employed to a
significant extent  for both  S02  removal and particulate  solids  collection.
Pilot test results were obtained on low sulfur fuels to elucidate the roles of
each control device in the dry scrubbing system.

     SO  removal in the spray dryer and fabric filter  is compared and the im-
portant process variables  identified.   Particulate collection of  fly ash/FGD
solids mixtures by the spray dryer and fabric filter  is examined.  The relative
amounts of solids collected at  different operating conditions are presented.
Fabric filter pressure drop variation with time and the effect of dry scrubbing
solids on the specific resistance  coefficient are described.  Spray dryer and
fabric  filter  solids  are  examined for  particle  size distribution, chemical
composition and moisture content.

               For  Presentation at the U.S. EPA Third Symposium
                      on the Transfer and Utilization of
                        Particulate Control Technology

                               Orlando, Florida
                               March 9-12, 1981
                                     TEXT

     The spray dryer is the primary SO  control element while the fabric filter
is the primary particulate control unit.  This paper presents  the  extent  and
limits of each device  for  S02 and particulate removal based on the  results of
field pilot test programs.
                                     313

-------
Pilot Plant Description

     The pilot test system (See Figure 1),  designed to treat up to 10,000 ACFM
of flue gas, consists of a spray dryer followed by a fabric filter.  Dirty flue
gas containing S02  and  flyash continuously enters the top of  the spray dryer
where it is intimately contacted with finely atomized lime slurry.

     Flue gas from  the spray dryer enters the bottom of  the fabric filter unit
and leaves from the  top.  From the fabric filter, the flue gas flows to an I.D.
fan and then  to  the stack.   The induced draft  fan moves  the treated  flue gas
through the system  and  a  second "reverse air"  fan periodically cleans  solids
from the fabric filter cloth.

Spray Dryer

     The pilot spray dryer is an 8'0 x 35' high unit equipped with  a  variable
speed  rotary  disc atomizer.   Intimate  contact between  finely atomized  lime
slurry  and  SO  in  the  flue  gas and large interfacial  area  produced by  ato-
mization in the spray dryer  result in  very  rapid SO, absorption.   In the  pilot
unit, coarse solids tend to settle in the conical Bottom  of the dryer and are
discharged through a rotary valve  to  receiving  drums.   The scrubbed  flue  gas
containing finer particles leaves the dryer through a side exit port and  flows
to the fabric filter.

     Temperature drop across the spray dryer  is  controlled by total  water flow
to the unit.  Water  for temperature control is metered as a trim water flow to  a
mixing tee immediately upstream of the spray dryer atomizer.   Increasing lime
reagent flow increases the SO«  removal efficiency at a  given water flow,  gas
flow  and  sulfur  dioxide content.   System SO   responses  to  changes  in  stoi-
chiometry are measured  by a  duPont UV analyzer which samples  both inlet  and
outlet streams from the spray dryer and fabric  filter.

Fabric Filter

     The fabric filter unit  size is 10' x 15' x 55' and it  contains two-sixteen
bag compartments  each designed to process about 5,000 cfm of flue gas.  Each of
the fabric filter bags is of commercial utility dimensions, 12" 0 x 30"  high,
and contains about 94 ft  of bag surface.

     During an operating cycle, a thin layer of  solid particles containing un-
reacted lime continually builds up on the  surface of the  filter  bags.  Flue gas
from the spray dryer with a  reduced SO concentration flows through  the  bed of
finely divided solids.  S0_ removal occurs although the gas contact time  in the
bed is short.
1 EPA policy is to express all measurements in Agency documents  in metric
  units.  This paper  uses English  units which are customary in the U.S. to im-
  prove clarity of presentation.  Conversion factors are provided in  the
  Appendix.


                                      314

-------
     To limit pressure  drop  across  the  filter  bags  resulting from the  accumu-
lation of collected  solids,  a flow of air periodically is passed through  the
bags in the reverse  direction for  a short period of time  (one-two minutes  per
hour).  The "reverse air" flow causes most of the solids deposited to dislodge
from the bag  surface and drop into  the collection  hopper where  they are dis-
charged through rotary valves.  (During the brief bag cleaning period, flue  gas
is bypassed around the  fabric filter.)

     When high  SC>2  removal  is desired,  reagent use becomes excessive  unless
solids  recycle  is practiced.   These recycle  solids  are obtained  from  the
baghouse and/or  spray dryer  and contain  unreacted  lime.   The solids are  fed
into the recycle  tank where  they are reslurried with  process water.    Slurry
from the recycle  tank  is  combined with  the slaked lime slurry and the mixture
is metered into the  spray dryer  atomizer.

Relative SO  Removal

     S02  removal in the dry scrubbing  system is   strongly  influenced by a
limited number  of process  variables.  Stoichiometric ratio (S.R.)  and tem-
perature are  two  of  the more significant parameters that dictate  SO  removal
both in the spray dryer and in the fabric filter.  The spray dryer, however, is
the  key SO  removal device   in the  dry scrubbing system.   At the conditions
tested  in the pilot  plant,  at least  75% of  the total  S09  removal in the  dry
scrubbing system  is  accomplished in the dryer,  according to  Figure 2.

     As Figure  2  indicates,  a decreasing percentage of the  total S0? removal
takes place in  the spray  dryer as stoichiometry is increased. Of course, com-
bined SO  removal in the spray dryer/fabric filter system is  greater at  higher
stoichiometry.  At lower  values  of  S.R.  (£1.0  moles slaked lime/mole SO in),
lime utilization tends to be  higher  in the spray dryer because lime becomes  the
limiting reagent.  A greater fraction of  SO   removal takes place in the spray
dryer at lower  S.R.  values since relatively  little  lime reagent  is present in
the FGD solids to the fabric filter from the  spray dryer.  At higher S.R., more
unreacted lime  is conveyed to the  fabric  filter and is available for reaction
because utilization  is  lower in  the spray dryer.

     Figure 2 shows  that  relative SO- removal is affected significantly  by  the
spray dryer and fabric filter operating  temperatures.   Lower operating tem-
perature results  in  greater  SO2 removal  in  both the  spray  dryer and  fabric
filter.  As the fabric filter operating temperature  is  decreased  between 200 F
and 145°F, S0«  removal  in the fabric filter  increases  significantly and rela-
tive SO  removal  shifts  toward the  fabric filter.

     S0_ removal  in  the spray dryer  is favored by  keeping  the  atomized lime
slurry as wet as possible for as  long as possible.  Lower operating temperature
produces improved S09 removal but  results in  a moist  solids product that is
difficult to discharge from the  spray dryer bottom.   The optimum spray dryer
operating temperature is arrived at by striking a  balance  between  high  SO2
removal and smooth handling of moisture-laden product solids. But, the  fabric
filter operating  temperature often must be controlled at a  higher level than
that of the spray dryer.  Avoidance of  dew point problems  (condensation),  bag
blinding and  low buoyancy  conditions  in the  stack are common reasons  for

                                      315

-------
increasing the fabric  filter  operating  temperature.  As a consequence,  rela-
tively less  SO-  removal takes  place in the  fabric filter  under these  con-
ditions.

SO,, Removal vs. Pressure Drop

     Fabric filter SO  removal varies not only with the  key process variables,
stoichiometric ratio  and temperature,  but also  with  time  between  cleaning
cycles.  After reverse air cleaning of the filter  bags,  fabric filter  pressure
drop (Ap) and SO   removal increase with  time.  Figure 3 presents SO  removal in
the fabric filter as a function of the  Ap  increase  during different operating
cycles.  Percent  SO- removal initially tends to increase  linearly with  pressure
drop and then begins  to  level off  at  higher AP values near the end of  the
cleaning cycle.  In these runs,  pressure drop  increased  from  about 2.0 in.  HO
initially to  between  4 and  5  in.  H.O at the  end  of operating cycles  of  60-90
minutes  duration.

     Figure 3 also shows the strong effects of stoichiometric ratio and fabric
filter inlet  temperature  on %SO-  removal  in  the  fabric  filter.   Percentage
removals of SO- entering the fabric filter  vary from as  low as 20-30% at S.R. =
1.0 and an inlet  temperature of 175°F to as high as 60-70%  at  S.R.  =  2.25  and a
temperature of 155 F.   Figure  3  indicates that reducing the fabric  filter  inlet
temperature from 175 F to 155  F has at least as great an  effect on  %SO_ removal
as increasing S.R. from 1.0 to the range of 2.1 to  2.25.

Fly Ash  vs. FGD Solids

     The relative amounts of fly ash and FGD solids  in the mixture  collected in
the spray dryer and fabric filter depend primarily  on three  factors:

     1.   Fly  ash grain loading  in  the flue  gas entering  the dry scrubbing
          system

     2.   SO  concentration of the flue gas

     3.   Lime stoichiometric ratio

     Fly ash  grain loadings  of  1.0-2.5 grains/actual  cubic foot (dry)   were
measured in  the  flue  gas at  both Big Brown  (TUSI) in  Texas and  at  Comanche
Station  (P.S. of  Colorado) in Colorado.  The amount of FGD solids  collected is
directly related  to the arithmetic product of the incoming flue  gas  SO   con-
centration and the lime stoichiometric ratio used  in a particular run to remove
SO .  SO levels  experienced varied  from 200  to 2000 ppm while stoichiometric
ratios tested  ranged  from about 0.5 to 6.0 moles slaked lime/mole SO- fed to
the spray dryer.

     For  a  given stoichiometry,  the amount of FGD solids  on a  weight  basis
depends  on the extent of conversion  of  lime to sulfur products, i.e., reagent
utilization, during dry SO- scrubbing.  The weight  of FGD solids  collected is
also slightly affected by the lime converted  to calcium carbonate by  reaction
with a^ and  by the  degree  of  oxidation that  occurs.   The extent of  the
oxidation reaction determines the ratio of calcium  sulfite to calcium sulfate

                                     316

-------
found in the product solids.   The sulfite/sulfate ratio of the product solids
in dry SO  scrubbing is significantly greater than  is  generally  found in wet
FGD scrubbing.   The  larger  ratio indicates that considerably  less  oxidation
occurs in the dry scrubbing systems where conditions  are not as favorable as in
wet FGD systems.  Table 1 shows typical chemical compositions of product solids
collected from  the spray dryer and fabric  filter under  recycle and  lime-only
dry scrubbing operations.

           TABLE 1.  TYPICAL PRODUCT SOLIDS CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS
                                  (Weight %)
   Component



   CaS03 • 1/2

   Ca(Oll)
   CaC03
   Flyash


Product Solids
                                      R-425
                                    (Recycle)
                                                R-501R
                                              (Lime Only)
                                 SD
                                18.6
                                 6.7
                                 0.5
                                 8.7
                                65.5
                                100.0
                                             SD
                                            23.9
                                             4.8
                                            <0.1
                                            17.5
                                            53.7
                                           100.0
                                                    FF
                                                    23.0
                                                     4.9
                                                     1.3
                                                    13.2
                                                    57.6
                                                   100.0
     The  product solids collected  in  the spray dryer are coarser  than  those
collected  in  the fabric filter.   Table 2 shows the mean  particle diameter  and
the geometric standard deviation of spray dryer and  fabric  filter  solids  ob-
tained from pilot plant runs at  a  number of different conditions.  From  the
runs,  the  average mean  particle  diameter (50 wt.% solids less  than the mean
value) of  the spray dryer solids is about 30-35 microns and the average  for
fabric filter solids is about 10  microns.  Figure  4 presents typical particle
size distributions of solids collected in the spray  dryer and  fabric  filter.
As Figure  4 also shows, the  fabric  filter fly ash/FGD solids particle  size in
this case  is  nearly identical to that  of fly ash  itself.   The  relative dif-
ference in particle size of  the  spray  dryer  and fabric filter solids  is  illu-
strated by the selected  scanning  electron micro  (SEM) photographs of Figures 5
and 6.  For comparison, fly  ash particulate  is depicted  in Figure 7.

               TABLE 2.   TYPICAL  PRODUCT SOLIDS PARTICLE  SIZES
                       Spray Dryer
                                                          Fabric Filter
Run No.
105
106
115
130
603
928
Average
  Mean
(Microns)
  35.0
  26.
  42.
  19.0
  35.0
.2
,5
  39.0
  32.8
                                 Std.  Dev.
                                  3.2
                                  3.2
                                  3.5
                                  3.6
                                  4.2
                                  5.0
                                  3.8
                                    Mean
(Microns)
   8.1
   9.8
   6.8
  11.0
   6.2
  14.0
   9.3
                                               Std.  Dev.
2.8
2.9
2.5
3.3
3.1
4.0
3.1
                                      317

-------
     Spray  dryer  solids,  according to  Figure 5,  tend  to be  composed of  a
mixture of large discrete particles, as well as agglomerates of  flyash and  FGD
solids.  From Figure  6,  fabric filter  solids are made up  of  finer  individual
particles  and  smaller agglomerates.   Particulate  size  and  the tendency  to
agglomerate appear  to be related to the  moisture content of the solids col-
lected.  Figure 8 shows  that  the  percentage of the total  solids collected  in
the system that drops out in the spray dryer increases directly as the moisture
content of the spray dryer solids  increases.  In normal operation, spray dryer
solids contain more moisture (10-25  wt.%)  than fabric  filter solids  (<5 wt.%).

     As Figure 1 shows,  the  flue  gas and particulate  leaving the spray dryer
must  turn  essentially 180   in direction  in  order  to enter  the outlet duct
located near  the  bottom  of  the spray dryer.   In  turning, the larger, more
agglomerated solids tend  to collect in the  spray dryer hopper while  the finer
particles are carried by  the flue gas into  the  fabric filter.

     Additional solids drying occurs between  the time the  flue  gas leaves the
spray dryer and its particulate is collected  in the fabric filter hopper.  It
is likely that the additional drying causes some agglomerates to disintegrate
and results in the collection of finer particulate  in the  fabric filter.

Fabric Filter Pressure Drop

     Particulate collection in the fabric filter during dry SCL  scrubbing pro-
duces an accumulation of  the flyash/FGD solids mixture  on  the filter cloth with
time during an operating  cycle.  Figure 9   shows typical linear pressure drop
increases as a function of time during the  cycle  for  Big Brown fly ash alone
and for mixtures  of fly  ash and  FGD solids.   Dry scrubbing system operation
with lime slurry feed, but  with no  recycle, produces about the same rate of
pressure drop increase vs. time as operation with  fly  ash alone. The  pressure
drop buildup rate is comparable in the  two cases even though the grain loading
in the  runs containing  FGD  solids  is  nearly double  that  present  in the fly
ash-only run (4.6 vs.  2.5  gr/acf) . When recycle solids are  introduced into the
system, in addition to the lime slurry feed and fly  ash already  present in the
flue  gas,  a significantly  greater  increase  in pressure  drop with  time  is
experienced.   In  this case  under recycle  conditions, the total particulate
grain loading in the system approaches twice that encountered in  the lime-only,
no-recycle  run  (7.9 vs.   4.6 gr/acf),  and  more than three times greater than
that for the fly ash-only run.

Specific Resistance Coefficient

     Specific resistance coefficients  computed from  pressure  drop vs. time
data show that the fabric filter  cake  resistance  decreases as the FGD  solids
content in  the  fly ash/FGD  solids  mixture increases.   Figure 10 presents a
correlation of the specific resistance  coefficient,  k  , versus the slaked lime
content fed to the spray dryer/fabric filter system.  Values of k  range from
about 30 in. H20-min.-ft./lb. for fly ash alone to  as low as  5 in.  H 0-min.-
ft./lb.  as the  lime  grain  loading   is  increased up  about   3.5  gr/acf  or
5 x 10  Ibs.  slaked lime/acf.  of flue  gas fed to  the  fabric filter.   In these
runs,  the lime  grain  loading is directly proportional  to the  stoichiometric


                                     318

-------
ratio used since the S02 concentration  in the inlet flue gas to the system was
held constant at 800 ppm.

     The  effect of  lime  grain  loading appears to be  more important  in  de-
termining the specific  resistance  coefficient  than the  total grain loading or
the recycle solids grain loading.  For  example, k  decreased from about 15 in.
H2O-min.-ft./lb. in  the recycle runs to near  5 in. H O-min.-ft./lb.   in  the
lime-only test  run at high lime grain loadings, although the total particulate
grain loadings were approximately the same.  The fly ash grain loading entering
the dry  scrubbing  system  in  the flue gas was constant at  2.5 gr/acf.  in  all
runs but  the  recycle solids and lime grain loadings varied considerably from
run to run.

     From these results,  it  appears  that a  specific resistance coefficient of
about  15  in.  H O-min.-ft./lb.  is  experienced  in the fabric  filter  operation
when Big  Brown  fly  ash is utilized  over a fairly wide range of practicable
operating conditions for dry S0« scrubbing.

                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     We  thank the  host utilities,  Public  Service of Colorado  (Comanche Sta-
tion) and Texas Utilities (Big Brown  Station), and their employees for the help
and cooperation in enabling Research-Cottrell to  conduct the pilot  test pro-
grams.  We also wish to thank Dr.   Theodore G.  Brna,  EPA Project Officer,  for
his aid and direction in conducting the EPA-funded portion of the work reported
in this paper.

                                   APPENDIX

                              CONVERSION FACTORS

To Convert From                         To                          Multiply
    English                            Metric                          By

scfm  (60°F)                          nm3/hr  (O°C)                    1.61
cfm                                  m /hr                           1.70
°F                                   °C                             (°F-32)/1.8
ft                                   m   3                           0.305
gr/scf                               gm/m                           2.29
in.                                  cm                             2.54
in. H00                              mm Hg                          1-87
lb   2                               gm                             454
                                       319

-------
            iL   iL
IDS RECYCLE            1
                                                                         I.D. FAN STACK
                      REAGENT
                    PREPARATION
                 FIGURE 1
                                          RESEARCH-COTTRELL
                                  DRY SCRUBBING PILOT FLOW  DIAGRAM
                                                                                                                                                   TSD=145'F, TFF = 2
                                                                              0.5     1.0      1.5      2.0     2.5     3.0      3.5

                                                                              STOICHIOMETRIC RATIO, MOLES LIME/MOLE SO, INLET
                                                                                                               FIGURE 2         RELATIVE SOj REMOVAL
U>
tsJ
o
                   8 30
                                                          TFF«155'F
                      0123456
                                          PRESSURE DROP, IN. H,0


                  FIGURE 3        FABRIC FILTER SO2 REMOVAL
                                                                                                         5

                                                                                                         S  "
                                                                                                            so
                                                                                                         Z  40



                                                                                                                                                • SPRAY DRYER SOLIDS

                                                                                                                                                • BAGHOUSE SOLIDS

                                                                                                                                                X FLYASH
                                                                                                         FIGURE 4
                                                                                 >      10      20      50      100     200     500     1000

                                                                                        PARTICLE DIAMETER, MICRONS

                                                                                  PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS

-------
   ;:   ;; y             :|*^2%
-------
CO
M
N3
                                                                                               20            30
                                                                               SPRAY DRYER SOLIDS MOISTURE CONTENT, WT. %
                                                              FIGURE 8    RELATIVE PRODUCT SOLIDS COLLECTION
                  FIGURE 9
                             20      40      60      60     100     120     140
                                      OPERATING CYCLE TIME, MINUTES
                                  FABRIC FILTER PRESSURE DROP
                                                                                                                                                          • LIME-ONLY
                                                                                                                                                          • RECYCLE OPERATION
                                                                                                                                                          X FLY ASH
                                                                                                   FIGURE 10
1.0         1.5        2.0       2.5
       LIME QRAIN LOADING, OR./ACF.

EFFECT of LIME CONTENT on K,

-------
       FIBER AND FABRIC ASPECTS FOR SO? DRY SCRUBBING BAGHOUSE SYSTEMS

              By:  Lutz Bergmann, V.D.I.
                   President, Filter Media Consulting, Inc.
                   P. 0. Box 2189
                   LaGrange, Georgia  30241

                              SUMMARY/ABSTRACT

    For more than 5,000 MW generating capacity (Table 1)  - foremost in  the
utility industry - orders are placed for a relatively new technology in the
particulate/S02 pollution control field.  This technology offers  many aspects
to the heart of these systems, the filter fabric handling the collection of
the combined product.  This paper addresses some basic and more specific
aspects of the fibers and the fabrics already used and to be selected in
future installations.
                                  PREFACE

    Economically, S02 dry scrubbing systems offer distinct advantages  -  at
least under certain conditions - not only in initial  capital  investment, but
more importantly, in operating and maintenance.(1)  Some major differences  or
a comparison between wet and dry systems may be summarized:

1.  A dry S02 scrubber has less equipment than a wet scrubber.  No equipment
    such as thickness, centrifuges, vacuum filters, and mixers is  required
    to handle the waste product.

2.  Waste products from the dry scrubber are collected along  with  fly  ash and
    can be handled with conventional dry material handling systems.

3.  Scaling and plugging problems due to wet/dry interface are not expected
    with a dry system since the interface is a point in space.  Only dry
    powder strikes the vessel walls (theoretically).

4.  Pilot plant work has indicated that corrosion problems are not experien-
    ced in dry systems provided the spray dryer outlet temperature is  main-
    tained at a proper level.

5.  The dry system has flexibility of operation.  Feed rates  can be immedi-
    ately adjusted with little concern for pH control.  Reagent consumption
    closely follows inlet S02 concentration.

6.  The first cost of the dry system is considerably less than a comparable
    specified wet scrubbing system.

7.  Considerably fewer operators and maintenance personnel will be required
    for a dry system.
                                     323

-------
8.  The dry system is expected to use only 25% to 50% of the energy required
    for a wet system.

9.  The gas volume of the spray dryers are reduced below those leaving the
    air heater with the resulting savings and costs for particulate collec-
    tion equipment.

10. With a dry system, the ID fan can be safely located just ahead of the
    stack without fear of fan corrosion and imbalance, and without need for
    reheating.

11. The water requirements for a dry system are much less than for a wet
    system.

12. Although the process of dry scrubbing is new, the components of the sys-
    tem have substantial operating experience with high availability of
    plants throughout the world.

13. Sludge disposal is nonexistent and consequently impact on environmental
    aspects is considerably reduced in utilizing dry systems.

                           (From Vendor Literature)
                                    324

-------
TABLE 1.  COMMERCIAL SPRAY-DRYER FGD SYSTEMS

Installation
UTILITY BOILER
Coyote
Unit 1
Antelope Valley
Unit 1
La ramie River
Unit 3
Stanton
Unit 2
Springerville
Unit 1 & 2
Rawhide
Unit 1
Riverside
Unit 6 & 7


Sunflowers
Hoi comb Unit 1
Niagara Power
Tonawanda, NY
Colorado Ute,
Craig St. #3
Tuscon Elec. Po.
Springville
Unit 1 & 2
Platte River
Rawhide #1
Antelope Valley
Unit 2
Light & Power
Marquette
Size
MW

410

440

575

63

350

250

100



300

100

450


350

250

440

44

%SO? Alkali Startup
Fuel Type, % S

Lignite, 0.78

Lignite, 0.68

Subbituminous,
0.54
Lignite, 0.77

Subbituminous,
0.69
Subbituminous,
0.28
Blend, subbit-
uminous, bitu-
minous, petro-
leum coke
Subbituminous



8950 Btu/lb.,
0.70

Subbituminous,
0.53 - 0.69
Subbituminous,
1.3
Lignite



INDUSTRIAL BOILER
Strathmore Paper
Company
Celanese Corp.

University of
Minnesota
Calgon Corp.
Pittsburgh
Argone National
Lab.
RI/WF - Rockwell
pitation Div. of
14

22

83


22

Bituminous,
2 - 2.5
Bituminous,
1 - 2
Subbituminous,
0.6 - 0.7
1.0 - 2.0 Sul-
phur +HC1

Removal Material

70

62/78

85

73

61

70

70



80



87


61

80



80


75

70/80

70

75


I nternati onal /Wheel abrator
Joy
Manufacturing CO/Niro

Soda Ash

Lime

Lime

Lime

Lime

Lime

Lime



Lime

Soda Ash

Lime


Lime

Lime

Lime

Lime


Lime

Lime

Lime

Soda Ash
Lime

--Frye; Joy/
Date

4/81

4/82

4/81

9/82

2/85
9/86
12/83

9/80



4/83

82

4/83


84/86

83



10/82


6/79

1/80

9/81

6/81


Niro -
Atomizer Inc. ; B&W
Vendor

RI/WF

Joy/Niro

B&W (ESP)

RC

Joy/Niro

Joy/Niro

Joy/Niro



Joy/Niro

(ESP)

B&W (ESP)


Joy/Niro

Joy/Niro

Joy/Niro

Buell/Anhydro


Mikropul

RI/WF

Carborundum

Joy/Niro
Joy/Niro

Western Preci-
- Babcock and
Wilcox; RC - Research-Cottrell
                      325

-------
Spray Drying Principle

    Spray drying is the transformation of a pumpable fluid feed (solution
slurry) into a particulate dried product, in a single drying process.  It has
to be assumed that the basic principle of spray drying is well documented,
although, the method of operation of the spray dryer absorber is relatively
simple.  The sorbent solution of the slurry is atomized into the incoming
flue gas stream to increase the liquid/gas interface and to promote mass
transfer of the S02 from the gas to the slurry droplets, where it is absorbed.
Simultaneously, the energy of the gas evaporates the water in the droplets to
produce a dry powder mixture of sulfite/sulfate and some unreacted alkali.
Gas then passes through the second stage fabric filter where the dry product
is collected and a percentage of the unreacted alkali reacts with the S02 for
further removal.(2)

Chemical Reaction/Temperature

    A great similarity to pure coal-fired boiler/fly ash applications can't
be denied; however, the most significant difference between fly ash collec-
tion and conditions in twin technology applications is continuous operation
temperature.

    The chemical interactions - when lime particles and S02 in the flue gas
form sulfite, respective sulfate - takes place most economically closest to
the moisture dewpoint - in the wet phase - thus representing an operation
temperature range between 130°F to 160°F in the spray dryer absorber.  It is
the upset conditions - the fact that the lime/water injection is "off-line" -
when suddenly the baghouse inlet temperature may raise to heat exchanger out-
let conditions between 340°F to 380°F and the temperature requirement for the
filter bag fabric has to accommodate these conditions.  Practically only
glass - woven, or needled fabrics - can withstand these requirements, provid-
ed that more expensive fabrics like Teflon^ or PBI^ or others would not be
considered viable candidates.

    Bypass or dilution would basically solve any sudden temperature surge in
the baghouse.  It is then obvious that the more attractive homopolymer
acrylic fabrics - woven or needled - not only would cost less to install, but
promises to be used at higher air-to-cloth ratios than glass.  The decision,
however, as to which system should get preference is site specific and can
probably not generally be addressed.  It also depends sometimes on regulatory
aspects, which may differ from state to state.

Combustion Efficiency

    Combustion efficiency has not been necessarily a major factor in the de-
sign stage of a number of existing units.  As it has turned out, at least in
one installation, the coal  quality and the amount of unburned carbon had
different effects on baghouse performance.  A larger amount of unburned car-
bon would allow very fine particles to reach the filter bag surface.  Natur-
ally, this can contribute to blinding.  If, in addition, moisture - in the
liquid phase - is present,  this problem multiplies itself and should either

                                    326

-------
be operationally resolved or considered in a more conservative design ratio.
The inlet loading expected, for instance, at 1 - 2 gr/cu.ft. may increase to
as much as 15 gr/cu.ft. hence, creating a much thicker dust layer on the
fabric.  This requires either a more frequent cleaning or cleaning at higher
pressure, in long term, however, affecting filter bag life especially with
the more fragile glass fabrics.

Boiler Load

    Boiler load may vary particularly in an industrial application, so it is
recommended that air-to-cloth ratios are based on maximum load rather than on
average load, since it is very difficult to predict how frequent maximum load
conditions may prevail.  If sometimes in the winter season a boiler has to
meet additional heating requirements, it is advisable to consider these fac-
tors at an early stage of design, since maximum load conditions may last sev-
eral months of operation.

Temperature Control

    Temperature control in.S02 dry scrubbing systems is based on the amount
of water being needed to cool the incoming gas to the desired "interface"
condition.  One is trying to operate these systems as close as practically
possible to the dewpoint.  One has to prevent condensation conditions, on the
other  hand, since excessive water will eventually blind the filter bags and
also create problems with corrosion in the baghouse and ash handling system,
notably in the hopper section.  If, for instance, the spray dryer in the
startup mode is fed with water only to balance the temperature prior to intro-
ducing lime slurry, a very small amount of $03 content in the flue gas raises
the acid dewpoint significantly.  This may have disasterous effects on the
filter material as well as eventually on the metal surfaces like cages, walls,
doors, etc.  Such conditions should be avoided or at least reduced to a
minimum.(Table 2)

    In summary, the temperature range at which systems are operated obviously
has the most profound effect on S02 removal efficiency and, therefore, main-
taining this temperature range is vital to a fully economic and successful
installation.

Fibers and Fabrics

    Basically speaking, as of today only two fibers are generally considered
for these systems.  These are glass and homopolymer acrylic.  Both fibers are
available in fabrics made from woven yarns, respective from needled
material.(3)  Each of the four types are currently under full-scale tests:

1.  Needled homopolymer acrylic at Strathmore with excellent results for more
    than 18 months.

2.  Needled felt glass at Celanese with interesting, although conflicting,
    results with the first set of bags for about 10 months, but the second
    set working very well since November, 1980.

                                     327

-------
                                          TABLE  2
CO
LU
ec.
a.
2!
UJ
I—

C3
CL.
O

s
K
Generic Name
Fiber
Trade Name
Recommended continuous
operation temperature
(dry heat)
Water vapor saturated
condition (moist heat)
Maximum (short time)
operation temperature
(dry heat)
Specific density
Relative moisture
regain in % (at 68 F
& 65% relative moisture)
Supports combustion
Biological resistance
(bacteria, mildew)
Resistance to alkalies
Resistance to mineral
acids
Resistance to organic
acids
Resistance to oxidizing
agents
Resistance to organic
solvents
Comments
Cotton
180°F
82°C
180°F
82°C
200°F
94°C
1.50
8.5
Yes
No,
if not
treated
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very
Good

Wool
200°F
94°C
190°F
88° C
230°F
no°c
1.31
15
No
No,
if not
treated
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Very
Good

Polyamid
Nylon 66
200° F
94°C
200°F
94° C
250°F
121°C
1.14
4. - 4.5
Yes
No
Effect
Good
Poor
Poor
Fair
Very
Good

Polypropylene
P
Herculon*
200°F*
94°C
200°F
94°C
225^F
107°C
0.9
0.1
Yes
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Excellent
*250°F for
Type 154
(under devel-
opment 8/80
                                             328

-------
                                           TABLE 2
GO

LU
0£
CD
•z.
*—I


-------
                                     TABLE  2

-------
3.   Woven glass at Northern States Power in operation since early 1981.

4.   Woven homopolymer acrylic fabric at Coyote in operation since early 1981.

    Depending on the baghouse system (inside or outside collection) the
fabric selection depends on the cleaning method.(4)

    The cleaning method, on the other hand, depends on the type of baghouse,
whereas Reverse Air and Shaker baghouses (the names originate from the clean-
ing action) require woven  fabrics, whereas the pulse jet/cage type (outside
collection system) calls for the more efficient needled fabrics.  Needled
felts are of a textile structure in which single fibers are mechanically
interlocked.  Normally, a  scrim is sandwiched in the center of the felt be-
tween two fiber layers.  The unique feature of needled felts is that the
single fiber is the active element in removing submicron size particles.
Sometimes special woven glass fabrics are being used on cage type collectors,
but this represents, basically speaking, an exception.

    Woven glass which is successfully used in large-scale coal-fired utility
applications, allows temperatures up to 500°F and short surges up to 550°F.
Chemically treated glass fabrics have a very good chemical resistancy,
however, being used in Reverse Air systems, with air-to-cloth ratios mainly
at 2:1, represents for many users a compromise.  It is only when woven glass
fabrics (special constructions) are being used on outside/cage type collect-
ors with special design cages, off-line cleaning, and the other important
precautions, that woven glass fabrics can be used at 4:1 and 4^:1 air-to-
cloth ratios.

Needled Glass

    Needled glass, today,  domestically available from two sources, is so far
successfully applied to outside cage type collectors.  The use of these
fabrics in S02 dry scrubbing systems is currently being tested.  The temper-
ature capability of these  fabrics is approximately the same as for woven
glass fabrics.  The air-to-cloth ratio should be approached rather conserva-
tively since experience has shown that high amounts of unburned carbon as
well as moisture can lead  to blinding and so the air-to-cloth ratio of 3Jg to
4:1 seems appropriate for  twin technology applications.  Addressing air-to-
cloth ratios like in fly ash applications, the kind of boiler (stoker vs.
P.C.) has great influence  on the design ratio.

Homopolymer Acrylic

    Homopolymer acrylic is considered already in one large S02 dry scrubbing
system, but is a viable fabric in many metal applications for many years.
Woven homopolymer acrylic  fabrics can be used in Reverse Air as well as
Shaker baghouses and can provide approximately 50% higher air-to-cloth ratios
as compared to woven glass on inside collecting systems (woolen system yarn
fabrics).  Homopolymer acrylic Dralon T is more economical than glass; the
temperature limitation, however, is 284°F.
                                     331

-------
    Homopolymer acrylic needled felts can be used at air-to-cloth ratios be-
tween 4 and 6:1 if the fabric is special  manufactured and,  most importantly,
exhibits a special surface treatment.  The difference between standard
Dralon T needled felts and special  manufactured,  special  surface treated
Dralon T felts is significant, particularly looking at the  application re-
quirement in S02 dry scrubbing systems.   The system very  well may go through
upset conditions, thus, could create a very moist environment in the baghouse.
On the other hand, different load factors may provide significant differences
in inlet loading conditions, at the same  time, unburned carbon may accumulate
much finer dust on the surface.  It is for this reason that special  surface
treated felts should be chosen over somewhat less expensive regular felts,
which simply do not hold up as well under such delicate working conditions.

    These special treatments (HCE II, Permaguard™, Hi-Rel™, Swiftclean™,
and Mirror Finish™, etc.) are available  from different manufacturers.

    Specific fabric specifications  are available  upon, request, but not part
of this paper.

Endnotes

1.  "Spray Dryer FGD Capital and Operating Cost", M.  Drabkin and E.  Robinson,
    Houston, October 1980.

2.  "Modeling The Spray Absorption  Process For S0£ Removal", Journal  APCA,
    December 1979.

3.  "Needled Felts for Fabric Filters", ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,
    December 1979, Lutz Bergmann, Filter  Media Consulting,  Inc.

4.  "Fiber/Fabric Selection for SOo Dry Removal Baghouse  Systems", POWER
    ENGINEERING, October 1980, Lutz Bergmann,  Filter Media  Consulting,  Inc.
                                    332

-------
                       TWO- STAGE DRY FLUE GAS CLEANING
                            USING CALCIUM ALKALIS

             By:   D.  C. Gehri, D. F. Dustin,  and S.  J. Stachura
                  Energy Systems Group
                  Rockwell International
                  8900 De Soto Avenue
                  Canoga Park, California  91304

                                  ABSTRACT

     Most of the dry flue gas cleaning  (FGC) systems  that have been sold to
date will utilize high-calcium lime as  the alkali reactant for S02 removal.
In a two-stage, dry FGC system,  optimum performance and utilization of lime
is achieved by the special  technique  of gas  bypass around the first-stage
spray dryer and/or by  recycle of particulates removed in the second-stage
collector.

     This paper presents  three  examples of dry  FGC  system performance with
lime using  the special techniques mentioned  above.  Three types of coal are
considered:   (1)  a low-sulfur western subbituminous,  (2) a medium-sulfur lig
nite  and  (3) a high-sulfur eastern bituminous.   The  required FGC systems are
discussed  in terms of  the lime  preparation  equipment, the flue gas cleaning
equipment,  and waste disposal techniques.

     An economic  evaluation of the three dry FGC systems is  given along with
a comparison to  equivalent electrostatic precipitator-wet scrubber combxna-
tlons.   As shown by the comparisons, a two-stage, dry FGC system  can be
economically employed for all the given fuel types.


                                 INTRODUCTION

      A two-stage, dry FGC  system consists of a first-stage spray dryer  which
 functionTas the primary S09 absorber, followed by a second-stage fabric fil-



 5££ coitions  to produce a reactive slurry  containing CaWH), parties
 of minimum size and maximum specific surface area.
      0ptimiZed performance  i

 let temperatures  as  close as  practical
                         f 4-v.o fahr-fr filter typically requires inlet temper-
     Reliable operation of ^^f^ay^yer outlet temperature.  This can
atures somewhat ^ove the opt^im spray dry<*           ?    ^ t
-------
                             SYSTEM APPLICATIONS

     In order to illustrate the performance of two-stage, dry FGC systems,
we have selected three examples of 500-MW utility boilers, each fired with a
different type of fuel.  The essential boiler, fuel, and flue gas character-
istics for these applications are given in Table 1.  These characteristics
were derived from TVA study premises with two exceptions and one addition.
The exceptions are:

          1)   It was assumed that all of the fuel sulfur converts to S02 in
               the flue gas and that the FGC system must meet NSPS require-
               ments based on that assumption.  The TVA premises account for
               some sulfur retention in the ash and reduce SO^ removal
               requirements to reflect that retention.   Our assumption clearly
               imposes a more stringent performance requirement on the FGC
               system and is consistent with the typical commercial specifica-
               tions for performance guarantees.

          2)   The lignite example is for a fuel containing 1.5% sulfur (dry
               basis), whereas the TVA base case uses 0.9% sulfur.  This
               higher sulfur level was chosen to reflect a typical maximum
               sulfur for North Dakota lignite and to provide an example of
               intermediate (~80%) S0~ removal requirements.

     The one addition to the TVA premises is in the category of active ash
alkalinity.  The numbers given in Table 1 reflect our experience in titrating
the given types of fly ashes to ascertain their potential value for recycle.
It should be noted that this parameter is indicative, but not necessarily
definitive as a measure of fly ash SO- absorption capacity in a dry FGC system.

The Western Subbituminous Application

     For the western subbituminous application, the FGC system has been opti-
mized using warm gas bypass.  This technique involves bypassing flue gas from
downstream of the air heater to provide reheat before the fabric filter.  As
shown in Table 2, a 10% bypass of the 300°F flue gas provides 15°F of reheat.
With a 17 F approach to the adiabatic saturation temperature (!.„) at the
dryer outlet and the 15°F of reheat, the 165°F fabric filter inlet temperature
is 35 F above the water dew point (T,).  Note that T, is typically 2 or 3°F
less than T  .  With the specified 50% recycle (defined as the fraction of
total collected product that is recycled), the "apparent utilization" in the
system is 100%.  This measure of system performance is the amount of S0»
removal compared to that which could be removed by reaction of the total
available CaO in the fresh lime feed.

     As shown in Table 2, the contribution of the fly ash alkalinity is sig-
nificant.  The difference between the actual lime utilization of 86.7% and
the "apparent utilization" of 100% reflects that contribution.  In general,
the relative contribution of an active fly ash is greatest for the low-sulfur,
low-removal applications in which recycle can be maximized without slurry
pumping problems.  In fact, "apparent utilizations well above 100% can often


                                     334

-------
be achieved."  In this particular example, a potential of 120% exists.  How-
ever, the only reliable technique to establish the optimum recycle fraction
is to test.  Frequently, the  incremental utilization improvements beyond a
certain recycle fraction do not justify the costs involved.

               TABLE  1.  EXAMPLE APPLICATIONS - 500-MW BOILERS
Fuel Type
Boiler Heat Rate
(Btu/kWh)
Fuel Sulfur
(%, dry basis)
Flue Gas Flow
(acfm, @ 300°F)
S09 in Flue Gas*
Tlb/h)
Fly Ash in Flue Gas
Western
Subbituminous
10,500
0.7
2,030,000
6,150
32,000
North Dakota
Lignite
11,000
1.5
2,160,000
15,800
48,000
Eastern
Bituminous
9,500
3.5
1,690,000
27,300
49,000
Active Alkalinity§
  in Fly Ash
  (lb/h of CaO)
                                 1,000
2,000
500
Adiabatic Saturation
Temperature ( F)
NSPS SO- Removal (%)
133
70
137
79.1
122
89.5
  Assumes  all of sulfur in fuel converts  to  SO

  Assumes  80% of ash in fuel becomes fly  ash
 §
  Typical  quantities for given fuel type  based  on mineral composition of
 fly  ash.

 The  Lignite  Application

     Warm  gas bypass has also been selected  for the  lignite application.  In
 this case, the lowest recommended approach to T.  of 15 F is used, and the
 12%  bypass fraction provides 18°F of reheat.  The resulting 170 F fabric fil-
 ter  inlet  temperature is again 35 F above T,.   With  the specified 60% recycle
 fraction,  the "apparent utilization" is 96%.  This recycle fraction is about
 the  maximum  possible without reaching the slurry pumping limits.  Fly ash
 alkalinity utilization of 59% has, therefore, been optimized.

     Even  though the SO  removal is greater,  the actual lime utilization of
 85.7%  is close to that for the previous example.  This is partially due to
 the  closer approach to T   and partially  due to the  greater recycle fraction.
                                      335

-------
                   TABLE 2.  SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SUMMARIES

                                  Western       North Dakota      Eastern
Fuel Type 	Subbituminous	Lignite	Bituminous

FGC System Temperature
  Profile (°F)
Dryer Inlet
. Dryer Outlet
. Fabric Filter Inlet
Bypass Gas
Bypass Fraction (%)
Recycle Fraction (%)
Pebble Lime* Used
(Ib/h)
SO Removal (%)
Apparent Utilization (%)
Actual Lime Utilization (%)
Actual Active Fly Ash
Utilization (%)
Product for Disposal
300
150
165
300
10
50
4,200

70.2
100
86.7

50
41,200
300
152
170
300
12
60
12,700

79.4
96
85.7

59
75,400
300
137
155
750
3
50
28,200

89.6
84
83.3

49
105,800
ft
  Assumes 90% available CaO in the lime
  Assumes average molecular weight of CaSO  product is 128.
                                          X

The only possibility for further utilization improvement is  in the selection
and/or slaking of the pebble lime.  All of the examples of this paper are
based on the implicit assumptions that the lime used is at least of "medium
reactivity" as defined by the AWWA slaking rate test (1),  and that the slak-
ing temperature is controlled at 185° +15 F using ball mills or paste slakers.
The use of a "high reactivity" lime and/or closer control  of slaking tempera-
ture (i.e., 190 +5 F) might provide some small improvement.   As a practical
matter, such improvement would have a limited impact on system economics.

The Eastern Bituminous Application

     For this application, the FGC system has been optimized using hot gas
bypass.  This technique involves bypassing flue gas from upstream of the air
heater and results in a minor penalty to the boiler heat rate.  However, it
is usually the choice when 90% or greater SO  removal is required.  A 15°F
approach to T   is again employed in the spray dryer, and  the 3% hot gas by-
pass results in a fabric filter inlet temperature 35 F above Td-  The
recycle fraction of 50% results in a slurry of maximum practical density, so
the system has been optimized.


                                     336

-------
     The important thing to note about  this example  is the relatively small
contribution of the fly ash alkalinity.  Recycle  is  primarily useful in pro-
viding a chance for the excess  unreacted Ca(OH)   to  aid in SO  removal.  The
importance of high-quality pebble  lime  and proper slaking techniques are
obvious.  The key concern, however,  is  not a  few  percentage points of utili-
zation.  Rather, it is the economics of a two-stage, dry FGC system using
lime, versus a wet scrubber using  limestone,  for  this application.

Waste Disposal

     The product of a two-stage, dry FGC system is a dry mixture of fly ash,
CaSO^, CaSO^, and unreacted lime.   For  all of the examples in this paper, the
fraction of unreacted lime is less than 5 wt  %.   The fly ash/CaSO  ratio
varies from 4:1 for the western subbituminous application to 1:1 ?or the
eastern bituminous application.  In its dry state, the waste material can be
handled in the same manner and  with the same  equipment as pure fly ash.  A
simple landfill operation  is a  suitable disposal  technique (2), although
alternate disposal methods and/or  end product uses are being explored.  For
purposes of economic comparisons,  landfill will be the basic disposal method
evaluated.

                                   ECONOMICS

     This paper will base  its economic  comparisons on a report prepared by
TVA  for EPA comparing a  "generic"  lime  spray  dryer FGD system with a wet
limestone-electrostatic  precipitator system for a low-sulfur, western subbitu-
minous application  (3).  That report provides the "base case" data from which
all  other economics in  the paper have been extrapolated.  These extrapolation
techniques were devised  by the  authors  of this paper who take full responsi-
bility  for their validity.  No  endorsement by TVA or EPA is implied nor
intended.

Capital Investment

     The  capital  investment comparison  of Table 3 are based on mid-1982 costs.
For  the dry FGC systems,  the base  system  costs were  taken directly from the
EPA-TVA report  (3) .  Extrapolation techniques used for the other cases are
listed below:

           1)   Material  Handling and Feed Preparation
                     1.3  x  base  for lignite  system
                     1.5  x  base  for eastern  system

           2)   Gas Handling - Directly  proportional  to  total  gas  flow

           3)    SO  Absorption  - Directly  proportional  to  gas  flow to  spray
               dryers

           4)   Particulate Removal - Directly proportional  to  total  system
               gas  flow
                                      337

-------
          5)   Recycle
                    2 x base for lignite and eastern systems

          6)   Disposal - Directly proportional to quantity of waste.

         TABLE 3.  CAPITAL INVESTMENT* COMPARISONS - 500-MW SYSTEMS
System
Material
Handling
and Feed
Prep.
Gas
Handling
S0_
Base
TVA-Dry
3.04
7.19

Western
Dry
3.0
7.2

Lignite
Dry
3.0
7.7

Eastern
Dry
4.5
6.2

Base
TVA-Wet
1.99
9.92

Western
Wet
2.0
9.9

Lignite
Wet
2.6
10.4

Eastern
Wet
3.0
8.4

Absorption    7.17    7.7     8.2     7.2    13.73   13.7    17.2    15.7

Particulate
Removal      11.13   11.1    11.6    10.0    12.40   12.4    12.9    10.5

Recycle       1.43    1.4     2.8     2.8        0000

Disposal      1.22    1.2     2.2     3.2     6.16    6.1     9-0    12.2

Other        34.99   35.4    40.6    38.1    48.91   48.9    57.9    55.2
(including
indirects)

   Totals    66.17    67      77      72     93.11    93      110     105

*
  All costs shown in millions of dollars.

     For the wet FGD systems (including an ESP),  the base system costs were
again taken from the referenced report.  Extrapolation techniques for all
cost categories were the same as used for dry FGC systems,  except that dis-
posal system costs are not proportional to waste quantity,  but rather 1.5 x
base for lignite and 2 x base for eastern.  This is significantly lower than
an extrapolation based on waste quantity.

     The two-stage, dry FGC systems are much lower in capital cost than wet
scrubber-ESP combinations for all of the example applications.  It is inter-
esting to note that the 500-MW lignite-fired boiler requires a more expensive
wet or dry system than its high-sulfur eastern counterpart.

Revenue Requirements

     The revenue requirement comparisons of Table 4 are based on 1984 costs
and include a $75/ton cost for lime and an $8.50/ton cost for limestone.  The
levelizing factor used in all costs, except capital charge, was 1.886.  The
capital charge is a levelized cost of 14.7% of the total investment.


                                     338

-------
         TABLE 4.  REVENUE REQUIREMENT* COMPARISONS - 500-MW SYSTEMS
System
Raw Materials
Labor and
Supervision
Electricity
Maintenance
Capital
Charge
Other
TVA-Dry
1.03

0.95
1.48
1.94

9.73
1.91
Dry
0.9

1.0
1.5
2.0

9.8
1.9
Dry
2.6

1.2
1.6
2.2

11.3
1.9
Dry
5.8

1.4
1.3
2.0

10.6
1.9
TVA-Wet
0.13

1.32
1.76
3.47

13.70
3.12
Wet
0.2

1.3
1.8
3.5

13.7
3.1
Wet
0.6

1.5
1.9
4.2

16.2
3.1
Wet
1.2

1.7
1.6
4.0

15.4
3.1
First Year
  Annual       17.04   17.1    20.8    23.0    23.50   23.6    27.5    27.0
Levelized
  Annual       23.52   23.6    29.2    34.0    32.19   32.4    37.5    37.3

*
  All costs shown in millions of dollars.

     Extrapolation techniques used are as follows:

          1)   Raw Materials - See Table 2 for lime quantites and assume 4,
               12, and 25 tons/h or limestone for the three wet scrubber
               cases.

          2)   Labor and Supervision - Add $200,000 to base for lignite and
               $400,000 to base for eastern.

          3)   Electricity - Proportional to total gas flow.

          4)   Maintenance - Proportional to direct capital investment.

          5)   Other - No change from base.

     As with the capital investments, the revenue requirements for the two-
stage, dry FGC systems are all lower than those for the corresponding wet
scrubber-ESP combinations.  However, within the probable comparative accuracy
of the original base case estimates (+10%) and the additional uncertainties
caused by extrapolation, the first year annual and the levelized annual
revenue requirements for the two eastern, high-sulfur systems could be about
equal.

     The obvious reason is the cost penglty of $4.6 x 10  for the use of lime,
which on a levelized basis is $8.7 x 10  per year.
                                      339

-------
Conclusions

     Two-stage, dry FGC systems have lower capital investments than comparable
wet scrubber-ESP systems for all cases evaluated.  They also have lower annual
revenue requirements, except for the eastern, high-sulfur applications where
the two alternatives could be about equal.  On the basis of these comparisons,
it is concluded that dry FGC systems can be economically employed on boilers
burning coal with up to 3.5% sulfur.

                                  ENDNOTES

References

1.   A.W-W.A, "Standard for Quicklime and Hydrated Lime," Std B202-65.

2.   Buschmann, J. C., et al., "Disposal of Wastes from Dry SO. Removal Pro-
     cesses," presented at Joint Power Generating Conference (September 1980).

3.   EPA-TVA, "Preliminary Economic Analysis of a Lime Spray Dryer FGD System,"
     EPA-600/7-80-050 (March 1980).
                                      340

-------
      CONTROL OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, CHLORINE,  AND TRACE ELEMENT  EMISSIONS
                FROM COAL-FIRED BOILERS BY FABRIC FILTRATION

               By:   R. J. Demski, J. T. Yeh, and J.  I.  Joubert
                     Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center
                         U. S. Department of Energy
                       Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  15236

                                   ABSTRACT

     Experimental programs carried out at the Pittsburgh Energy Technology
Center (PETC) have demonstrated that fabric filtration systems are effective
in controlling emissions of a number of pollutants resulting from the combus-
tion of bituminous coal  in boilers.  In studies conducted in a 500 Ib/hr
coal-fired furnace equipped with a baghouse, it was found that the baghouse
filter cake  removed significant portions of the toxic trace elements mercury,
selenium, arsenic, beryllium, lead, and cadmium.  When operating the baghouse
in combination with injection of dry sorbents such as nahcolite, trona, and
sodium bicarbonate, approximately 95%  removal of sulfur dioxide and chlorine
was obtained.

      In this paper, the  previously  reported study relating to control of trace
elements  is  summarized.  Emphasis  is placed on  the  recently completed investi-
gation of S02 control by dry  sorbent injection.  In  the latter study, tests
were  conducted  with coals  ranging  in sulfur content  from  1 to 3 percent
Operating variables considered  included baghouse temperature, baghouse cleaning
cjcle time,  sorbent particle  size,  and the  ratio of  sorbent to sulfur.  With
the exception of baghouse  cleaning cycle  rate,  each parameter had a  significant
effect on S02 removal.


                                   INTRODUCTION

      Until  the latter half of the 1970's,  the preferred method  for  participate
control  in  the utility industry was electrostatic  precipitation  However






sulfur  (>3  percent) coal is burned (2).
                                      341

-------
Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization

     In parallel with the increasing interest in baghouse filtration for
particulate control, a considerable amount of development work has been con-
ducted utilizing baghouses in conjunction with dry flue gas desulfurization
systems (4-7).  A dry FGD system is one in which an alkaline sorbent is
injected into the boiler flue gas as a dry powder or aqueous slurry; the
sorbent reacts with SC>2 to form a dry product containing sulfates and sulfites.
The mixture of spent material and fly ash is separated from the gas stream by
the baghouse, where additional reaction between the sorbent and SOg occurs.
While ESP's can also be used in dry FGD systems, the use of baghouses has been
favored.

     Data reported in the literature indicate that sodium compounds are con-
siderably more reactive than calcium compounds when injected into flue gas as
dry powders, although reactivities of the calcium compounds (particularly
lime) are increased when they are injected via a spray dryer system.  The
study described in this paper was confined to dry-powder injection tests with
sodium bicarbonate, nahcolite (a sodium bicarbonate mineral), and trona (a
sodium carbonate/bicarbonate mineral).

     The objective of the tests conducted at PETC was to evaluate the relative
effectiveness of the three NaHCOs sorbents mentioned in removing S02 from flue
gas streams.  The tests were carried out in an experimental furnace designed
to burn 500 Ib/hr of pulverized coal.  Parametric studies were conducted to
determine the effect of operating parameters on SC>2 removal efficiency and
sorbent utilization (gram atoms Na converted to Na2S04/gram atoms Na injected).
Parameters varied were sorbent/sulfur ratio, sorbent particle size, and bag-
house temperature and cleaning cycle time.  Three types of bituminous coal
were burned, ranging in sulfur content from 1 to 3.1 percent; the heating
value of each coal was about 13,500 Btu/lb.  All tests were conducted at an
excess air level of 20 percent.

Control of Chlorine Emissions

     The chlorine content of most American coals ranges from 0.01 to 0.5
percent.  The chlorine content of Western coals is generally low, but higher
levels are present in Central and Appalachian coals.  Nearly all of the chlo-
rine contained in coal is emitted to the atmosphere as hydrogen chloride when
the coal is burned (8,9).

     Chlorine emissions from large fossil-fuel burning installations are not
currently regulated.  However, because of the large quantities of coal burned
in the United States, the quantity of hydrogen chloride emitted to the atmos-
phere is significant (=1.5 million tons/year).  These emissions may contribute
to acid rain formation as well as create an air pollution hazard in the vicini-
ty of large power plants burning high-chlorine coal.  Hence, while chlorine
emissions are not currently regulated, the desirability of minimizing the
emissions is obvious.  In this paper, data are presented that indicate high
levels of removal of chlorine from flue gases can be achieved in conjunction
with dry sorbent flue gas desulfurization.
                                    342

-------
Control of Trace Element Emissions

     Although toxic elements  are  present  in very  small  quantities in coal
fissions of these elements to  the  atmosphere  are not insign f cant  ™s ng

niinn  T ™  ^1     ^^  element  l6VelS ^ 101  C°alS a"3lyZed by thC
Illinois State Geological  Survey  (10),  the  potential total tonnages of trace
elements released to  the atmosphere are
Element

Lead

Arsenic

Cadmium

Selenium

Beryllium

Mercury
Amount in Coal, PPM

       34.8

       14.02

        2.52

        2.08

        1.3

        0.2
Amount Emitted,  Tons/Year

           24,673

            9,940

            1,787

            1,475

              922

              142
     A study was  conducted  in  the  PETC  500  Ib/hr  combustion test facility to
determine to what extent  each  of these  trace  elements is retained in the fly
ash captured in a baghouse  filter  (11).   The  effects of baghouse temperature,
fly ash loading on the  filter  bags,  and carbon  content in the fly ash were
investigated.  Fly ash  loading was controlled by  baghouse pulse cycle, and the
carbon content was controlled  by varying the  amount of excess air fed to the
furnace.
                                  EXPERIMENTAL
Combustion Test Facility
     The 500 Ib/hr  combustion  test  facility  is shown schematically in Figure 1.
The furnace was designed  to  simulate  the performance of an industrial steam
generator.  The unit  is 7  feet wide,  5  feet  deep, and  12 feet high, and has a
volumetric heat liberation rate  of  about 16,000 Btu/hr-ft3 at a thermal input
of 6.5 million Btu/hr.  The  furnace walls are refractory-lined and water-cooled.

     Coal is charged  to the  hopper, pulverized to a size consist of 70% minus
200 mesh, and then  is  conveyed by the primary air into a recycle coal loop
where intimate mixing  of  coal  and air occurs.  Four adjustable exit tubes are
connected to the recycle  loop; these  convey  the primary air-coal mixture to
each of the four burners.  Secondary  air at  600°F is fed through adjustable
swirl vanes surrounding each burner.  The flue gas exits the furnace at about
2000°F, passes through a  convective heat transfer section, and is then used to
preheat the secondary  air  to the desired inlet temperature.  By controlling
the air flow through  the  recuperative air preheater, the flue gas exit tempera-
ture can be maintained in  the  range of  300°-475°F.
                                      343

-------
     The baghouse is a Mikro-Pulsaire* model manufactured by the Pulverizing
Machinery Division of the Slick Corporation, and is 6 feet, 6 inches in
diameter and 9 feet, 10 inches high.  It contains 57 Nomex bags, 8 feet long x
4.5 inches OD.  The unit is normally operated at air/cloth ratios of 4-4.5
feet/minute.

Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization Tests

     The dry-sorbent injection system is shown schematically in Figure 2.  This
rather simple system provides reliable and accurate feeding of solid sorbent.

     In most of the tests, dry sorbent was injected into the 12-inch diameter
flue-gas duct at the exit of the preheater, 26 feet upstream of the baghouse.
The nominal flue gas velocity in the duct is about 50 feet/second, which
results in a gas/solid contact time of about 0.5 second prior to entering the
baghouse.  A few tests were conducted while injecting sorbent at the inlet of
the baghouse.

     Gas analyses, as well as temperatures, pressures, and flows, are recorded
with a computerized data collection system.  The flue gas is analyzed at four
locations (see Figure 1):  at the furnace outlet; at the air preheater outlet
(prior to sorbent injection); at the baghouse inlet; and at the baghouse outlet.

     Typical analyses of the nahcolite and trona used in the dry sorbent tests
are given in Table 1.  The nahcolite was supplied by Superior Oil Company from
a mine near Rifle, Colorado.  The trona was obtained from a Stauffer Chemical
Company mine in Rock Springs, Wyoming.  The sodium bicarbonate used was USP
grade and was =» 100 percent NaHCOs-  Much of the parametric testing was con-
ducted with this material because it is well characterized chemically and is
available in carefully graded size consists with the following industrial
designations:  No. 3 (32 micron mean particle diameter); No. 1 (69 micron);
No. 2 (110 micron); No. 4 (115 micron); and No. 5 (180 micron).

                TABLE 1.  TYPICAL ANALYSES OF NAHCOLITE AND TRONA

                                     Nahcolite      ,  .  ,.         .     Trona
                                                    (Weight Percent)

                                    Not Detected                        24.3

                                        62.7                            25.3

Na                                      22.1                            24.9

K                                       0.1                              0.2

Ca                                      0.65                             1.3

Mg                                       0.5                             0.6

                                        86.05                           76.6
-"Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service is
to facilitate understanding and does not necessarily imply its endorsement
or favoring by the United States Department of Energy.
                                     344

-------
     Most of the tests were  conducted  with  a  1 .6-percent-sulfur Pittsburgh
seam coal.  Twelve tests  were  carried  out with  a 3.1-percent-sulfur West
Virginia coal, and two tests with a  1-0-percent-sulfur Kentucky coal.

Chlorine Removal Tests

     The chlorine removal study was  conducted during two dry-sorbent injection
tests with nahcolite  and  one test with sodium bicarbonate.  Pittsburgh seam
coal, containing 0.11 percent  chlorine,  was burned  in each test, and the
baghouse temperature  was  maintained  at 400°F.

     Gas samples were extracted from the stack  (after the baghouse) through a
glass probe and tubing.   Approximately 100  ft3  of gas was drawn through a
fritted-disc bubbler  immersed  in an  ice bath; this  was followed by a dry
ice/acetone bath to  condense residual  moisture.  The Volhard technique was
used to determine the amount of chlorine in solution.

Trace Element  Removal Tests

     The trace element  removal tests were  conducted while burning Pittsburgh
seam coal  containing  the  following levels  of  trace  elements:

                Element                          Amount, PPM

                Arsenic                            8.3

                Lead                              7.9

                Beryllium                          1.38

                Selenium                           1-25

                Mercury                            0.15

                Cadmium                            0.14

      The  baghouse was operated at temperatures ranging  from 275°  to  365°F.
 The fly ash loading on the  filter bags was varied over  the  range  of  0.0003  to
 0.05  lb/ft2 by adjusting the baghouse cleaning cycle rate,  and the carbon
 content of the fly ash was  controlled at values ranging from 5 to 20 percent
 by varying the excess air level.  Details of the analytical procedures  used in
 this  study were reported previously (11).

                              RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 Dry Flue  Gas Desulfurization Tests

      Results of the dry  flue gas desulfurization tests are summarized here.
 A more  detailed report of this investigation will be published in the near
 future  (12).
                                      345

-------
Sodium Bicarbonate Tests

     Most of the parametric and exploratory testing was carried out with USP
sodium bicarbonate.  In general, tests with the other sorbents were confined
to varying the Na2/S ratio at a fixed set of operating conditions.

     The effect of baghouse temperature was examined over the range of 350°-
450°F.  Number 1 (69 micron) sodium bicarbonate was used at a Na2/S ratio of
1.3.  The S02 removal efficiency was found to level off at temperatures in
excess of 400°F.  With the other sorbents, a temperature of 400° also appeared
near optimal in terms of 862 removal, and this temperature level does not
represent a severe operating condition for the baghouse.  Thus, most of the
testing was carried out at approximately 400°F.

     To determine the effect of sorbent particle size on S02 removal, a series
of tests was conducted with sodium bicarbonate at a Na2/S ratio of 2 and a
baghouse temperature of 400°F.  The S02 removal efficiency varied approxi-
mately linearly with the mean particle diameter of the sorbent.  The data
indicated that S02 removals of 90 percent are achievable at mean sorbent
diameters of 65 microns or less.  For a stoichiometric ratio of 2, this
corresponds to a sorbent utilization of 45 percent.  However, in a series of
tests with No. 3 sodium bicarbonate (32 micron diameter), it was found that 90
percent S02 removal could be attained at a Na2/S ratio of 1.3, corresponding
to about 70 percent sorbent utilization.

Tests with Nahcolite

     A series of tests was conducted with Pittsburgh seam coal while injecting
nahcolite with a mean particle diameter of 37 microns.  Figure 3 shows the
effect of Na2/S ratio on 862 removal at 400° and 420°F.  As expected from the
earlier sodium bicarbonate tests, the slight difference in temperature appears
to have no major effect on the removal achieved.

     It should be noted that varying the baghouse cycle rate over the range 6
to 30 minutes also had no apparent effect on S02 removal.  This was found to
be true in all other tests performed, regardless of the sorbent employed.  It
is believed that this is an indication that reactions are confined to only a
thin outer layer of sorbent deposited on the filter bags.

     For the conditions stated in Figure 3, 90 percent S02 removal is achieved
at a Na2/S ratio of 1.1.  This corresponds to 82 percent sorbent utilization.

     Two tests were conducted with the Kentucky coal containing 1.0 percent
sulfur, and six tests were conducted with the West Virginia coal containing
3.1 percent sulfur.  Baghouse temperature was maintained at 400°-420°F, and
the cycle times were either 15 or 30 minutes.

     The results for the Kentucky coal, at Na2/S ratios of 1.1 and 1.2, were
consistent with the results obtained with the Pittsburgh seam coal indicated
in Figure 3.  However, the S02 removal efficiencies achieved when burning the
3.1%-S West Virginia coal were somewhat lower than those obtained with the
Pittsburgh seam coal; a Na2/S ratio of 1.5 was required to achieve 90 percent
802 removal.  The reason for this is not apparent.  Intuitively, one would
                                     346

-------
anticipate greater  reactivity with the  West  Virginia  coal, as initial S02
concentrations should be  higher than when burning  Pittsburgh seam coal.  The
same phenomenon has been  noted by others  (13).

Tests with Trona

     A series of  ten tests  was conducted  with  trona with a mean particle
diameter of 59 microns  while  burning 1.6%-S  Pittsburgh  seam coal.  Another
series of seven tests was carried out with a second batch of trona (32 microns)
while burning 3.1%-S West Virginia coal.   The  results are plotted in Figure 4.
As in the case with nahcolite, higher S02 removal  efficiencies were achieved
while burning Pittsburgh  seam coal than with West  Virginia coal, although here
the difference is more  pronounced.   In  fact, if  one were to adjust the West
Virginia coal curve to  account for particle  size effects, the difference would
be even greater  (a  decrease in S02 removal efficiency by approximately 3
percentage points at each Na2/S ratio).

Chlorine Removal  Tests

     Results of the chlorine  removal tests,  carried out in conjunction with
three dry FGD tests, are  given in Table 2.  All  tests were conducted at a bag-
house temperature of 400°F.  In one of  the tests,  the sorbent Na2/S ratio was
varied over the range of  0.84-1.12, while in the other  two tests, the Na2/S
ratios were maintained  at 0.99 and 1.04,  respectively.

     Chlorine removal efficiencies ranged from 95.6 to  98.8 percent.  These
results indicate  that even without attempting  to optimize operating parameters,
dry, Na-containing  sorbents are extremely effective in  reducing emissions of
chlorine from coal-fired  boilers.

  TABLE 2.  REMOVAL  OF CHLORINE IN BAGHOUSE WHILE BURNING PITTSBURGH SEAM COAL
CONTAINING 0.11 PERCENT
Sorbent
Mean Particle Diameter, (Jm
Na2/S Ratio
Chlorine Fed with Coal,
Ib/hr
Chlorine in Flue Gas
(after baghouse), Ib/hr
fVil ^v--i no Romirwa 1 Pprrpnt
CHLORINE; BAGHOUSE
Nahcolite
37
0.84-1.12
0.55
0.024
95.6
TEMPERATURE :
Nahcolite
37
0.99
0.55
0.0066
98.8
400°F
Sodium
Bicarbonate
69
1.04
0.54
0.011
98.0
Removal  of Trace Elements
      The  amounts of the trace elements mercury,  selenium,  arsenic, beryllium,
 lead,  and cadmium retained by baghouse fly ash and furnace bottom ash are
 ziven in  Table 3   (These tests were conducted without sorbent  injection.)
                                      347

-------
The contribution of the bottom ash is small, since only 10 percent or less of
the coal ash remains in the furnace during a given test.

     The retention of mercury and selenium was sensitive to baghouse loading.
Loadings of 0.03 to 0.04 lb/ft2 were required to achieve high levels of reten-
tion; these loadings correspond to baghouse cycle times of 35 and 60 minutes.
Baghouse loading had no effect on retention of the other trace elements.

     Baghouse temperature also affected the retention of mercury and selenium.
Lower temperatures (270°-300°F) produced higher levels of retention.

     The retention of mercury also appeared to increase with increasing carbon
content of the fly ash.  It is believed that this may be due to adsorption of
mercury by the carbon.

     Comparing these results to results reported by others (14,15), it is
apparent that significantly higher retention of mercury, selenium, arsenic,
and beryllium is possible with a baghouse than with an electrostatic precipi-
tator.  However, the levels of retention of lead and cadmium reported here are
lower than values reported in other studies involving power plants equipped
with ESP's.  Material balances on these two elements indicated a significant
fraction (25-60 percent) of each was unaccounted for in each test.  Hence, the
elements or their combustion products may have condensed out of the gas phase
in cooler sections of the boiler upstream of the baghouse.

           TABLE 3.  TRACE ELEMENT RETENTION BY FLY ASH AND BOTTOM ASH

 Element               Average Retention, Percent              Range, Percent

Mercury                         100118*

Selenium                        100±13*

Arsenic                           91                               74-120

Beryllium                         77                               62-94

Lead                              63                               53-77

Cadmium                           55                               52-65
"'"Optimum Conditions

                                   CONCLUSIONS

     The FGD study discussed in this paper has confirmed that high levels of
S02 removal can be achieved via dry powder injection of NaHC03-bearing sor-
bents into the flue gas of coal-fired boilers.  The mineral nahcolite is
particularly effective.  Commercially produced sodium bicarbonate is slightly
less reactive than nahcolite.  The mineral trona was found to be less effec-
tive, probably due to the lower bicarbonate content of this material.  With
all three sorbents, S02 removal efficiencies in excess of 90 percent could be
                                     348

-------
achieved, although in some cases at  fairly  low sorberit utilization effi-
ciencies.  Future investigations at  PETC will focus on improving sorbent
utilization while burning high-sulfur  coals.  A spray dryer system has been
added to the test facility,  and a  sorbent recycle system will be installed.
The planned work will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of lime and
limestone slurry injection.

     In tests conducted  concurrently with the dry FGD tests, it was found that
greater than 95 percent  removal of chlorine was obtained with nahcolite and
sodium bicarbonate.  While emissions of chlorine from power plants are not
currently regulated, this nevertheless represents a valuable additional bene-
fit of dry FGD technology.

     The emissions of the trace elements mercury, selenium, and arsenic can be
effectively controlled via fabric  filtration.  Significant amounts of the
elements beryllium,  lead, and cadmium  are also retained in the baghouse fly
ash.  The best results were  obtained at baghouse temperatures lower than that
required («s400°F) for S02 emission  control by dry sorbent injection.  How-
ever, when injecting sorbents as slurries using a spray dryer system, high S02
removal efficiencies can be  achieved at flue gas temperatures significantly
lower than 400°F.  It appears probable, therefore, that boilers equipped with
spray dryer/baghouse systems can be  operated with minimal emissions of not
only S02 and Cl2, but also the major toxic  trace elements.

                                REFERENCES

  1.  Reigel, S. A. and R. P. Bundy.  Why the Swing to Baghouses?  Power.
     January 1977.   p. 68.

  2.  Anon. Chemical  Engineering.   December  31, 1979.  p. 19.

  3.  Pruce, L. M.  Interest  in Baghouses on Upswing.  Power.  February 1980.
     p. 86.

  4.  Midkiff, L. A.  Spray-Dryer System Scrubs S02.  Power, 123, No. 1, 29,
     1979.

  5.  Lutz, S. J., R. C.  Christman, B.  C. McCoy, S. W. Mulligan, and K. M.
     Slimak.  Evaluation of  Dry  Sorbents and Fabric Filtration for FGD.
     Prepared by TRW,  Inc.  for U.  S. EPA, EPA-600/7-79-005, January 1979.

  6.  Blythe, G. M. ,  J. C. Dickerman, and M. E. Kelly.  Survey of Dry S02
     Control Systems.  Prepared  by Radian Corp. for U. S. EPA, EPA-600/7-
     80-030, February  1980.

  7.  Burnett, T. A., K.  D. Anderson, and R. L. Torstrick.  Spray Dryer FGD:
     Technical and Economic  Assessment.  Symposium on Flue Gas Desulfuriza-
     tion, Houston,  Texas, October 28-31,  1980.

  8   Kear  R  W  and H   M. Menzies.  Chlorine  in Coal:  Its Occurrence  and
     Behaviour during  Combustion and Carbonisation.  BCURA Monthly Bulletin,
     Vol. XX, No. 2, p.  53,  February 1956.

                                     349

-------
 9.   lapalucci,  T.  L.,  R.  J.  Demski,  and D.  Bienstock.   Chlorine in Coal
     Combustion.   U.  S.  Bureau of Mines, RI  7260,  1969.

10.   Ruch,  R.  R.,  H.  J.  Fluskoter,  and N.  F.  Shirap.   Occurrence and Distribu-
     tion of Potentially Volatile Trace Elements  in  Coal.   Report,  Illinois
     State Geological Survey, August  1974.

11.   Yeh, J. T.,  C.  R.  McCann, J.  J.  Demeter,  and  D.  Bienstock.   Removal of
     Toxic Trace Elements from Coal Combustion Effluent  Gas.   U.  S.  Energy
     Research and Development Administration,  PERC/RI-76/5,  September 1976.

12.   Yeh, J. T.,  R.  J.  Demski, and J.  I. Joubert.  Control  of 863 Emissions by
     Dry Sorbent Injection.   To be presented at the  ACS  Symposium on Advances
     in Flue Gas Desulfurization,  Atlanta, Georgia,  March 29-April  3,  1981.

13.   Parsons,  E.  L.,  L.  F.  Hemenway,  0.  T. Kragh,  T.  G.  Brna,  and R.  L.  Ostop.
     S02 Removal by Dry FGD.   Presented at the Symposium on Flue  Gas  Desul-
     furization,  Houston,  Texas,  October 28-31, 1980.

14.   Bolton, N.  E.,  J.  A.  Carter,  J.  F.  Emergy, C. Feldman,  W.  Fulkerson,  L.
     0. Hulett,  and W.  E.  Lyon.   Trace Element Mass  Balance  Around  a  Coal-
     Fired Steam Plant.   Fuel Chem. Preprints, 18(4):114-123,  1973.   (ACS
     166th National Meeting,  Chicago,  Illinois.)

15.   Klein, D. H.,  et al.   Pathways of Thirty-Seven  Trace Elements  Through
     Coal-Fired Power Plant.   Environmental  Science  and  Technology.   October
     1975.   p. 973.
                                     350

-------
Coal hopper
                            ©@©@
                        Flue gas sample positions
                                                     Boqhouse
                                                       Secondary
                                                                      Air flow
                                                                    control valve
                                            Sorbent
                                            hopper
                                                                                                    Sight glass
                                                                                                     Rotary feeder
                                             *• To injection
                                                   point
   Figure !. Simplified flowsheet of 500lb/hr pulvenred-coal-fired furnace
          Figure 2. Dry sorbent injection system
         0.7  0.8 0 9  1 0 1 1  1 2 1.3  1 4 1 5  1.6 1 /
                       Na2/S RATIO


  FIGURE 3. SO2 REMOVAL WITH NAHCOLITE WHILE
         BURNING PITTSBURGH SEAM COAL
                                                                  80
                                                                                      SORBENT: TRONA

                                                                                      BAGHOUSE TEMPERATURE. 400'F

                                                                                        O • PITTSBURGH SEAM COAL (1.6% S)
                                                                                           (S9-MICRON SORBENTI

                                                                                        a - WEST VIRGINIA COAL (31% S)
                                                                                           (32-MICRON SORBENT)
                         1.5        2.0
                           Na2/S RATIO
                                                                                                         2.5
                                                                                                                   3.0
FIGURE  4. SO2 REMOVAL WITH TRONA WHILE BURNING
     PITTSBURGH SEAM AND WEST VIRGINIA COAL
                                                         351

-------
                FLYASH COLLECTION USING A VENTURI SCRUBBER
            MINNESOTA POWER'S COMMERCIAL OPERATING EXPERIENCE

                      By:  Carlton A.  Johnson
                           Peabody Process Systems, Inc.
                           835 Hope Street
                           Stamford, Connecticut  06907

                                 ABSTRACT

     Minnesota Power elected to use a venturi scrubber as a particulate re-
moval device for Clay Boswell Station, Unit No. 4 (500 MW).  The selection was
based upon significant cost savings when compared to conventional precipitator
technology.

     Prior to start up of the full scale system, extensive pilot plant test
work was conducted to determine performance characteristics related to both
particulate removal and opacity-   Unit No. 4, now in commercial operation,
provides comparison of predicted performance based on pilot plant data with
full scale system performance.  This paper discusses the comparison of actual
performance versus predicted performance.

                               INTRODUCTION

     In December 1976 Minnesota Power awarded a contract to Peabody Process
Systems for an Air Quality Control System for the 500 MW Clay Boswell Unit
No. 4, Cohasset, Minnesota.  The system was designed for integral particulate
and S02 removal using a venturi and spray tower absorber.  Selection of a
venturi for particulate removal gave a 25 million dollar capital cost savings
compared to using conventional electrostatic precipitator.

     The design of the Air Quality Control System was based upon burning a
sub-bituminous coal from the "Big Sky" mine at Coalstrip, Montana, where the
Rosebud and McKay seams vary in sulfur content from 0.4% to 2.8% with approxi-
mately 10% ash content.

     Prior to start up of the full scale system, extensive pilot plant test
work was conducted to determine performance characteristics relating to SOo
removal, particulate removal and opacity.  Clay Boswell Unit No. 4, 500 MW
started commercial operation in March of 1980.  The performance of Unit No. 4
the full scale system, has since been compared with the earlier pilot plant
results.

System Description

     The system design criteria for Clay Boswell Unit No. 4 are shown in
Table 1.  Raw flue gas containing S02 and particulate enters the air quality
control system (AQCS) via a ductwork plenum.  The ductwork plenum distributes
the raw flue gas to any three or four gas cleaning trains.  Under full load
conditions three gas cleaning trains are operational.  The fourth gas
cleaning train is a spare.   Each train includes a venturi and absorber and is
designed to function independently.

                                    352

-------
                                   Table  1

     DESIGN BASIS

     Unit Generating  Capacity                   500 m
     Coal Sulfur Content                        2 87
     S02 Emission  Standards                     lYlbs. SOo/mm BTU
     Particulate Emission  Standards             Q 1 Ibs /mm BTU
     Flue Gas Volume                            2,207,000 ACFM
     Percent of Gas Scrubbed                    95 to 100%
     No. of Gas Cleaning Trains                 3 Operating/one spare
     No. of Venturi Recycle Pumps/Trains        1 Operating/one spare
     No. of S02 Absorber Recycle Pumps/Trains   2 Operating/one spare
     Flue Gas Inlet Grain  Loading               11 gr./SCF
     Particulate Removal Efficiency             99.7%
     S02 Removal Efficiency                     90%
     Alkali                                     Lime/flyash
     Waste Solids  Disposal Methods              Ponding
     Reheat Method                             None or 800°F
                                                Bypass gas

     The raw flue  gas  distributed  by the ductwork plenum enters the gas
cleaning trains at the top of  the  venturi in each operating train where first
stage cleaning - removal of particulate is accomplished.

     The venturi selected  for  particulate removal is based on the radial-flow
design concept.  The  venturi design must contend with the problems of abrasion
and solids build-up due to hot gas contacting the slurry used for particu-late
removal.  To avoid solids  build-up, the venturi is designed using a "dentist
bowl" concept.  The upper  section  of the venturi consists of a conical section
in which slurry is introduced  tangentially.  The quality of slurry used is
several times greater  than the potential evaporative capacity of the hot flue
gas.

     The excess quantity of slurry insures that the conical section is com-
pletely wetted thus eliminating solids build-up.  Raw flue gas enters the
venturi through an insulated thimble section which introduces the gas below
the slurry injection  point, keeping the gas/slurry contact point below the wet-
dry line and eliminating solid build-up.

     Inherent in the  design of a venturi are three distinct areas where ab-
rasion can occur.  The first is where the gas makes a 90 degree turn to flow
through the cylindrical orifice.  Abrasion in this area is avoided by having
the gas impinge on a  pan filled with slurry, which absorbs the impact of the
gas.  This pan is  maintained full by the flow of slurry from the "dentist
bowl" and supplemental slurry  added via a bull nozzle.   The slurry required
for the "dentist bowl" and the bull nozzle is pumped from the recycle tank.

     The slurry overflow from  the pan and the raw gas are mixed intimately  in
the cylindrical orifice around the pan.  It is at this point that particulate
removal is achieved.
                                     353

-------
     The second area where abrasion can occur is at the orifice which cannot
be eliminated.   However, the wear surface in the orifice area is fabricated
from disposable sections easily replaced which simplifies maintenance.

     The third area is the wall section in the main shell of the venturi.  The
gas and slurry mixture leaving the orifice has a high velocity which if allowed
to impact on a surface, also could cause severe abrasion problems.  This situ-
ation is avoided by maintaining a sufficient distance between the orifice area
and the wall of the venturi.  This allows the gas to expand and slow down
sufficiently to be nonabrasive.  As an added precaution, the wall is rubber
lined to withstand any residual abrasive impact.

     The flue gas and slurry mixture then flow into and through the base of
the absorber into the recycle tank.  The slurry mixture is then pumped to the
spray headers in the absorber for removal of SC>2 from the gas.

     The absorber is a high-velocity spray tower design.  Each absorber con-
sists of six spray banks through which a slurry containing flyash is sprayed
countercurrent to the gas flow.  The gas, as a result of being contacted with
the slurry is cleaned of SC>2.  Under design conditions only four spray banks,
two per recycle pump, are used.  The other two spray banks and one recycle
pump are spares.

     After leaving the absorber zone, entrained slurry in the flue gas is
removed by means of a two stage mist elimination section.  The first stage is
a weeping sieve tray deluged with a mixture of reclaimed water and river water.

     Final de-entrainment, particularly of gas entrained water, is accomplished
in a second stage which is a chevron type mist eliminator.

     The wet gas leaving the absorber flows to a ductwork plenum from which it
is distributed to four I.D. fans and then discharged to the stack.  The gas
system downstream of the absorber is designed to run with or without reheat.
When reheat is desired, a slip stream of 800 F flue gas taken ahead of the air
preheater is injected into the outlet duct of each absorber via spargers.  The
reheat gas which amounts to approximately 5% of the total flue gas stream is
cleaned of particulate by means of a precipitator prior to injection into the
scrubbed gas.

     Each module has a recycle tank which collects the slurry draining from
both the venturi and the absorber.  One pump circulates slurry to the venturi
and three pumps are installed for circulation of slurry to the absorber.  Two
absorber spray headers are dedicated to each recycle pump only two of which
operate at design conditions.

     Waste slurry overflows from the recycle tank to a waste slurry sump which
also collects all drainage and water used for system flushing.  The waste slurry
is then transported from the sump to a pond in which the solids are allowed to
settle.  The water reclaimed from the slurry is recycled back to the AQCS system
for reuse.  The system operates on a totally closed loop water balance basis.


                                     354

-------
Fresh water is added  to  the  system to make up  for  losses resulting from evapo-
ration and water  bound with  the  waste solids.

     In the event a purchased alkali (lime)  should be  required, a lime slaking
system has been incorporated in  the system.  The lime  is prepared as a 20 wt.
percent slurry and fed to a  storage tank.   A lime  slurry recirculation system
transports the lime slurry to the modules.

     As a site convenience,  the  owner elected  to dispose of flyash collected in
baghouses from Units  No.  1 and 2 with the  waste solids from Unit No. 4.  To
accomplish this the dry  flyash from Units  No.  1 and 2  is prepared as a slurry
and fed to the Unit No.  4 AQCS system waste solids disposal.

Pilot Plant Testing and  Results

     The contract between Minnesota Power  and  Peabody  guarantees both the
particulate and S02 removal  efficiencies.   To  further  Minnesota Power
personnels' indoctrination of the operating characteristics of the system and
confirm the guarantees,  a pilot  plant test  program was originated.  The test
program extended  over a  eighteen month period, objectives of the program
included the  following:

     1.  Confirm  the  pressure drop in the  venturi  required to meet
         particulate  and opacity emission  standards.

     2.  Confirm  the  system  SC>2  removal efficiency of  90%, when
         burning  coals containing up to 2.8% sulfur.

     3.  Demonstrate  that the system can operate on a  closed-loop
         water balance.

     4.  Determine the alkali utilization  of the flyash.

     5.  Evaluate alternative alkalis.

     6.  Define waste solids characteristics such  as settling rates,
         percent  moisture, and settled solids.

     The pilot plant  (Fig. 1) to achieve the above objectives was installed
on Unit #3 at the Clay Boswell station.  Unit  #3 has the same boiler design
and is burning the same  coals which are to be  burned in Unit #4.  Thus, the
results obtained  from the pilot  plant could be considered representative of
the results to be expected for Unit #4.

     The pilot plant  system  was  identical  in concept to a proposed full-scale
unit  with some modifications based on practical economical considerations.
The lime slaker system was not installed.   An  in-line  electric reheater was
used in lieu  of the hot  gas  bypass system.   A  thickener and vacuum filter
were used in  lieu of  a waste solids pond system.
                                      355

-------
     The pilot plant data demonstrated that the venturi performance is signi-
ficantly affected by particle size distribution, as evidenced by particulate
removal curve.  (Fig.  2)

     For particle sizes of 2.5 microns or larger, the percent removed is
essentially 100%, regardless of venturi pressure drop.  The percent removed
drops off slightly as particle size decreases from 2.5 microns to 0.8 microns.,
It is in the less than 0.8 micron size range that the venturi pressure drop
has the greatest significance.

     Data was also plotted (Fig. 3 & Fig. 3A) showing the total outlet grain
loading as a function of venturi pressure drop.  The curves for both coals are
shown.  The venturi system had been based upon achieving a 0.03 gr./SCFD (0.06
Ibs./MM BTU) using a 12 inch w.c. pressure drop.  The curves show that with
Rosebud coal the 0.03 gr./SCFD could be achieved with a 6 inch w.c. drop
pressure, whereas the McKay coal required an 8 inch w.c. pressure drop.   Both
curves appear to indicate that regardless of pressure drop, outlet grain load-
ings significantly less than 0.01 gr./SCFD (0.02 Ibs./MM BTU) are not achieva-
ble.  Particulate removal performance was guaranteed by Peabody at a venturi
pressure drop of 12 inch w.c..  The test data confirmed that this value could
easily meet the required emission standards.

     Opacity is a different problem.  Test results showed that even with
particulate loading significantly less than that required to meet emission
standards a 20% opacity was not achievable.  This is partially attributed to
the fact that stack geometry is an important factor in estimating the measured
opacity.  The larger the stack diameter, the more difficult it becomes to
achieve a low opacity value.

     A significant cost benefit was also established for integral particulate
and S02 removal.  During the S02 removal study phase of the test program it
was established that S02 emission standards could be met without the need for
purchased alkali.  The alkali in the ash is sufficient to satisfy S02 removal
requirements.  This cost benefit had not been included  in the economic evalu-
ation of the system.
Commercial Operating Results

     Clay Boswell Unit No. 4 was started up in March 1980.  During the start-up
period the site was experiencing a strike of its operating and maintenance
personnel.  Consequently this was started up with a skeleton crew consisting
of Minnesota Power supervisory personnel.  Despite the lack of operation and
maintenance resources the Air Quality Control System started up with only
minor problems.  The system entered formal commercial operation in May  1980.

     At Design Sulfur Coal Conditions (2.8%) to comply with the 1.2 Ibs.,
S02 MM BTU emission standard, a 90% S02 removal is necessary.  However, at
less than design sulfur coals environmental permit requirements also dictate
a minimum 862 removal of 60%.  Based on the actual coals burned, (Fig. 4) the
60% S02 minimum removal is the controlling emission criteria.  Operation of
the AQCS is therefore geared to meeting the 60% S02 removal standard.

                                     356

-------
     The AQCS has the  flexibility to save  pumping  power by allowing the recycle
pumps for the absorber to  be  turned  on and off  as  required.  Generally, when
less than design sulfur coals are burned,  the quantity of slurry recirculated
in the AQCS can be reduced.   Two  absorber  recycle  pumps are required for the
maximum design sulfur  coals.   Under  actual sulfur  coal conditions, only one
of the pumps is used,  resulting in an operating power saving.

     Pilot plant operation indicated that  the recycle slurry should be con-
stituted with a low  pH to  maximize the extraction  of the alkali from the fly-
ash.  To this end a  pH value  of 4 or less  has been maintained.  SINCE COM -
MERCIAL OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM THE  S02 EMISSION STANDARD HAS BEEN MET WITHOUT
THE NEED TO USE ANY  PURCHASED ALKALI.

     Performance tests have shown that the S02  and particulate emission stand-
ards have been met.  However, as  predicted,  stack  opacity is significantly
greater than  20%.  These results  confirm the pilot plant test data.

     The full  load  operating  requirements  for Unit No. 4 are set forth in
Table  2 below:

                                   Table 2

                                         DESIGN              NORMAL
                                        % S COAL           % S COAL

     No.  of  Gas  Cleaning Trains           3                  3
     No.  of  Operating  Venturi
       Recycle pumps/trains                1                  1
     No.  of  Operating  Absorber
       Recycle pumps /trains                2                  1
      System Pressure Drop
       inches  w.c.                         20                 18
     Power  Requirement Excluding
       Draft  Loss  KW                     4416               2771
      % Rated Capacity                   0.88               0-55
      Lime  Requirement-lbs. /hr .         32241                 0

      At  present  two operators per shift (4 shift basis) are required.  Minnesota
 Power  had  originally budgeted a greater number  of  operators, however,  during
 start-up  it  became evident that two men/shift  were adequate.

      Since  start-up, the system has evidenced  almost  a  100% availability.
 Except for  approximately nine  (9) hours during which  a  problem with  a
 programmable controller was  encountered, the AQCS  has not  restricted the
 generating capability  of Clay Boswell Unit #4.   (Fig.  5)

 Conclusion

      ri«v Roswell Unit #4 has  demonstrated that a venturi integrated with an
      Clay Boswell unit **         reliable Air Quality Control System.  How-
                                      ~J " f •

-------
     As emission standards are tightened the pressure drop required will
increase.  As determined in the pilot plant tests, the key to venturi
performance is the amount of sub-micron particles in the raw flue gas.  For
some coals the quantity of sub-micron particles is relatively low so that a
reasonable pressure drop is needed to meet the current standard of 0.03 Ibs./
MM BTU.  For other coals, particularly western coals, the flyash contains a
large portion of sub-micron particles.  This requires a very large pressure
drop (20 w.c. or greater) which imposes a very severe energy penalty on the
system.  However, a new technology has emerged which promises to offset that
penalty.

     The new technology has been developed by Peabody and is labeled "Heatron".
It is a wet tubular electrostatic precipitator which replaces the mist elimi-
nator in the upper section of the 862 absorber.  This device can achieve
extremely high particulate removal efficiency with a minimal energy con~
sumption.

     Thus, today, an Air Quality Control System equipped with a "Heatron"
and venturi or a modified version thereof can meet emission control require-
ments and achieve significant cost savings when compared to conventional
systems using a dry electrostatic precipitator or baghouse.
                                    358

-------
    Figure  1
Figure 2
Figure  3
                                        Minnesota Power and Light
                                            Pilot Plant Installation
                                      Clay Boswell Station-Unit no. 3
                             Boiler
                                                 Krebs
                                                 Participate
                                                 Scrubber
                                           Venturi
                                                               I.D.
                                                   Spray       Fan
                                                   Tower
                                                   Absorber
                                          % Particle Removal vs. Panicle Diameter
                                           as a Function ol Venturi Pressure Drop
                                               Particle Diameter. Microns
n Loading, Qrain/SCFD
s s s s s sss;
Outlet Grai
n 01 -g 03 «>2





































Ifl

















III

















•j







^









'rft







s









iSI








X








fft








v








Dr









x







W









Si







?s

















n

















iiif










^^






t (










~-<






>ra










^






n





Cc



<
• —






nil





al:




—






rlii





R<











g





se

















)Ul




























                                         g    8   10   12   14   16   18   20  22

                                          Venturi Pressure Drop, Inches W.C.
                                   359

-------
Figure  3A
Figure 4
                      £  06
                      O  .07
                      8  .oe
                      2  .05
                      a
                      ?  "
                            2   4    6   B   10   12   14  16   1B  20   22  24   26   28
                                      Venturi Pressure Drop, Inches W.C.
                                            Figure 4
                                    Minnesota Power and Light
                                      Clay Boswell Station
                               Daily Coal Sulfur Content Variations
                        2.0
                      CO
                     8
                           1 3  5 7 9  11  13 15 17  19 21 23  25 27 29  31
                                              July 1980
Figure  5
                                            Figure 5
                           Minnesota Power & Light Clay Boswell Station
                                         Unit No 4 Availability
                             100      "~
                              90
                              80
                           | 70
                           Is 60
                              50
                              40
                              30
                              20
                              10
                               0
                                  J  FMAMJJASOND
                                	1980	
                                360

-------
                            AUTHOR INDEX
AUTHOR NAME

Albrecht,  P.R.
Anderson, M.H.
Arce-Medina, E.
Ariman, T.
Armstrong,  J.A.
Bakke,  E.
Half our, W.D.
Bamberger,  J.A.
Bergmann, L.
Berlant, M.J.
Bernstein, S.
Beutner, H.P.
Bickelhaupt, R.E.
Boericke, R.R.
Bohn, R.
Borenstein,  M.
Brookman, E.T.
Bump,  R.L.
Bush, P.V.
Calvert, S.
Carries, D.
Carr, R.C.
Chamberlain, H.L.
             PAGE

            IV-116
             11-334
             11-76
            III-290
     IV-188, IV-252
             1-236
            111-119
            III-398
             1-323
             11-218
             H-405
     111-71, III-228
             1-165
            III-353
            IV-344
             111-90
            IV-125
             11-425
             1-157
III-l, 111-10, IV-156
            IV-135
              1-118
             IV-406
                                   361

-------
AUTHOR INDEX  (cont.)
AUTHOR NAME                                                    PAGE
Chambers,  R.                                                       I-45
Chiang, T.                                               m-250,  III-261
Chou,  K.H.                                                       IV'73
Cowen, S.J.                                                      IV-264
Crippen, L.K.                                                     I-148
Crowson, F.                                                      III-438
Crynack, R.R.                                                    H-242
Czuchra, P.A.                                                     IV-55
Dalmon, J.                                                        H-390
Demski, RJ.                                                      1-341
Dennis, R.                                                  1-1,  HI-140
Dietz,  P.W.                                              III-449,  III-459
Donovan,  R.P.                                                     1-11
Drehmel, D.C.                                            III-341,  IV-210
DuBard, J.L.                                                     IV-383
Durham, M.                                                11-54,  IV-285
Ensor, D.S.                                                1-176,  IV-242
Eskinazi, D.                                                      III-238
Faulkner, M.G.                                            11-199,  IV-395
Feldman, P.L.                                                      IV-3
Ferrigan III, J.J.                                                  1-197
Finney, W.C.                                                      11-358
Fjeld,  R.A.                                                       11-179
Fortune, O.F.                                                       1-82
                                   362

-------
AUTHOR INDEX (cont.)
AUTHOR NAME
                                                                  PAGE
Frazier, W.F.                                                     III-171
Gardner, R.P.                                                    III-128
Gaunt, R.H.                                                      1-216
Gehri, B.C.                                                       I_333
Gentry, J.W.                                                     III-406
Giles, W.B.                                                      III-468
Hardison, L.C.                                                   111-33
Harmon,  D.L.                                                    IV-317
Hawks,  R.L.                                                     III-221
Helfritch, D.                                                       1-75
Henry,  F.                                                        III-301
Henry,  R.F.                                                     IV-63
Hesketh, H.E.                                                    IV-222
Hoenig, S.A.                                                     HI-382
Hovis, L.S.                                                        1-23
Hyde, R.C.                                                       J'129
lionya,  K.                                                m-181,  HI-321
Jaworowski, R.J.                                                  1-185
Jensen, R.M.                                                      l~138
Joergensen, H.J.                                                 n-370
Johnson, C.A.                                                     I"352
Kalinowski,  T.W.                                                 In-311
Kanaoka, C.                                                     m-280
Kirstein, B.E.                                                    II][-373
                                   JDJ

-------
AUTHOR INDEX  (cont.)
AUTHOR NAME                                                    PAGE
Kolnsberg, HJ.                                                   IV-179
Krishnamurthy, N.                                                IV-232
Ladd, K.                                                      1-55, 1-65
Lagarias,  J.S.                                                     l~212
Landham,  Jr., E.G.                                                J'237
Langan, W.T.                                                    III-211
Lawless, P.A.                                         H-25, 11-35, 11-44
Leith,  D.                                                         IH-270
Leonard,  G.L.                                                     H-120
Maartmann, S.                                                     11-130
Mahoney,  D.F.                                                    1-206
Mappes,  T.E.                                                    III-150
Martin, D.                                                       IV-145
Masuda,  S.                                                11-189,  11-380
Mathai, C.V.                                                     IV-200
Mazumder, M.K.                                            11-160,  11-169
McCrillis, R.C.                                                   IV-306
McElroy,  M.W.                                                      1-94
McLean,  KJ.                                              1-265,  11-304
Menegozzi, L.                                                     11-404
Menoher,  C.                                                     Ill-Ill
Mitchner, M.                                                       11-97
Moore, W.E.                                                       IV-105
Mormile, D.                                                       IV-363
                                   364

-------
 AUTHOR INDEX (cont.)
 AUTHOR NAME                                                    pAQE
 Moslehi, G.B.                                                     IM09
 Mosley,  R.B.                                                 ^ n_13
 Musgrove, J.G.                                           m_193/ In.201
 Noonan, P.M.                                                    IV-326
 Oglesby, H.S.                                                    m_80
 Ostop, R.L.                                                       j_107
 Parker,  R.                                                 m_51/  IV_2
 Parquet, D.                                                      III-363
 Parsons, Jr., E.L.                                                1-303
 Patton,  J.D.                                                     III-160
 Pearson, G.L.                                                     1-120
 Pedersen,  G.C.                                                   111-60
 Petersen, H.H.                                                    1-291
 Piulle, W.                                                         1-253
 Potokar, R.W.                                                    III-417
 Prem,  A.                                                        HI-21
 Presser, A.M.                                                     IV-26
 Pyle, B.E.                                                        I][-66
 Raemhild, G.A.                                                   H-349
 Reardon, F.X.                                                    III-102
 Rimberg, D.B.                                                    11-262
 Rinaldi..  G.M.                                                     IV"95
Rinard, G.                                                "'283, H-295
Rubow, L.N.                                                      IV"83
                                  365

-------
AUTHOR INDEX  (cont.)
AUTHOR NAME                                                    PAGE
Rugg,  D.                                                        11-273
Samuel, E.A.                                                     11-149
Schliesser, S.P.                                                   11-252
Semrau,  K.T.                                                     111-43
Shilling, N.Z.                                                     11-230
Smith,  W.B.                                                        1-96
Snaddon, R.W.L.                                                 IV-74
Sparks,  L.E.                                              11-314, 11-326
Spawn, P.O.                                                    IV-335
Starke, J.                                                      III-428
Stevens, N.J.                                                      1-313
Sullivan,  K.M.                                                    11-141
Tatsch, C.E.                                                    IV-353
Teller, AJ.                                                     III-393
Thompson, C.R.                                                  11-415
Urone, P.                                                       IV-275
VanOsdell, D.W.                                                    1-35
Viner,  A.S.                                                     IV-168
VVakabayashi, A.                                                 III-332
Wang,  H.H.                                                       IV-36
Wang,  J.C.F.                                                    IV-373
Wegrzyn,  J.                                                      IV-46
Weyers, L.L.                                                      1-226
Wilks,  W.H.                                                      IV-15
                                  366

-------
AUTHOR INDEX (cont.)

AUTHOR NAME
                                                                   PAGE
Williamson, A.D.                                                   IV-297

Yamamoto,  T.                                                       11-87

Yung,  S.                                                    IV-l,  IV-155
Zarfoss, J.R.                                                      11-208
                                   367
                                                   6USGPO: 1982 — 559-092/0429

-------