380
A  MANUAL OF  ELECTROSTATIC  PR
TECHNOLOGY  - PART I  -  FUNDAMENTAL

Sabert Oglesby,  et al

Southern Research Institute
Birmingham,  Alabama

25 August  1970
      NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE
                                             Distributed ... 'to foster, seive
                                                and promote  the nation's
                                                    economic development
                                                       and technological
                                                         advancement.'
                                              U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

-------
                        A MANUAL OF
           ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR TECHNOLOGY
                   PART I - FUNDAMENTALS
SOUTHERN  RESEARCH  INSTITUTE
2000 9th Avenue S.     Birmingham, Alabama 35205

-------
  STANDARD TITLE PAGE
  FOR TECHNICAL REPORTS
  *. Title and Subtitle
I. Report No.
      APTD-0610

      A Manual of Electrostatic Precipitator Technology
                  Part  1 - Fundamentals
  '.  Authors)
     Sabert Oglesby. Jr.  and Grady B. Nichols
  i.  Ptrformlnt Orientation Name and Address
     Southern Research Institute
     2000 9th Avenue,  S.
     Birmingham, Alabama   35205
{TI'SponsoTlng Agency
    Division of  Process Control  Engineering
    National Air Pollution Control Administration
    Cincinnati,  Ohio   45227
 13. supplementary Note*
                                                                       3. Reclplent'i Catalog no.
                                                 5. Report Date
                                                      August 25. 1970
                                                           Organization uooe
                                                 8.  Performing Organisation Kept. No.
                                                 10. Project/ TesK/Work Unit No.

                                                 TT.
                                                                          CPA-22-69-73
                                                                        13. Type of Report & Period Covered
                                                                       14. Sponsoring Agency
                                                               r-TSBe
  16. Abstracts "               ——————_—__________________________—-_-----—_.
  The state  of technology of  electrostatic precipitation for particulate emission control
  is reported. Th-is report  is intended to serve as a basic handbook on the subject of elec-
  trostatic  precipitation covering the entire  system including  fundamental theory, design,
  operation,  and application. Its purpose is to provide a source of information  that will
  be of benefit to the researcher, manufacturer,  and user of electrostatic precipitators.
  The systems study included  a review of literature pertaining  to  electrostatic  precipita-
  tion, a  comprehensive review of precipitator fundamentals, a  survey and review of the use
  of precipitators in each  of eight major application areas, and a review of the potential
  for electrostatic precipitators in new applications. In order to provide information use-
  ful to a wide range of users, this manual is organized to present a general  review of the
  precipitation process, with qualitative relationships between the various precipitator
  functions,  and a detailed quantitative analysis of each of the system functions. Particul
  emphasis is placed on the validity of the theoretical derivations in view of the    (over
                                                                          ar
                                                                          )
 17. Key Words and Document Analysis, (a). Descriptor!

    Air pollution control  equipment
    Electrostatic precipitators
    Design  criteria
    Gas flow
    Electric corona
    Electric charge
    Electrical resistivity
    Maintenance
    Manuals
    Handbooks
 17b. Identlflers/OpervEnded Terms
                     Reviews
 17e. COSATI Field/Group    13/02.  20/03. 09/03
 18. Distribution Statement
    Unlimited
                                      19. Security Class (This Report)
                                          UNCLASSIFIED
                                      B.Securlty Class. (This Page)
                                          UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                                 «. NO. of Pag7s~
                                                                                   .
POMM MW-«07<1-70)

-------
                       A MANUAL OF
      ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR TECHNOLOGY

                 PART I  -  FUNDAMENTALS
           Prepared Under Contract CPA 22-69-73

                            for

THE NATIONAL AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
           Division of Process Control Engineering
                      Cincinnati, Ohio


                                           by

                                Sabert Oglesby.  Jr.,  Director
                                Engineering Research and
                                Principal Investigator

                                           and

                                Grady B.  Nichols, Senior Engineer
                 Southern Research Institute
                   Birmingham,  Alabama
                      August 25, 1970
                      10, 000-2291-XIII

-------
                          This  report was  furnished to the Air

                          Pollution Control  Office  by the

                          Southern Research  Institute in fulfill-

                          ment  of Contract No. CPA-22-69-73.
 16. Abstracts  (cont'd)

assumptions made  and  the significance of the interaction of variables of importance
 in precipitator operation. Further discussions include mechanical design considerations,
 energization equipment, gas flow, operational problems, and the current utilization of
 precipitators  in  the  major application areas. ;

-------
                                FOREWORD
      This manual of electrostatic precipitator technology was prepared
under Contract CPA 22-69-73 for the National Air Pollution Control
Administration, Division of Process Control Engineering, with
Mr.  Timothy W. Devitt serving as Project Officer.  The manual is
presented in two parts.  Part I covers the fundamentals of electrostatic
precipitation and Part II covers the application of electrostatic precipita-
te rs to control of  emissions in various application areas.

      Part I of this manual was prepared on the basis of a comprehensive
review of precipitator literature and discussions with those active in
research in the field of  electrostatic precipitation.   Part II of the manual
was  prepared on the basis of information prepared by Research-Cottrell,
Inc., Bound Brook,  New Jersey,  based on records covering installations
in the various application areas.  These installations include some
designed by other precipitator manufacturers,  as well as those designed
by Research-Cottrell.

      To supplement the data furnished by Research-Cottrell,  Southern
Research Institute conducted a survey of a number of installations in
various industries.  In some instances, considerable data were available
covering both design and performance of the precipitators.   In other
instances,  data were not available.   Consequently,  the  extent and quality
of the information covering the application areas varies.

      Rust Engineering  Company, Division of Litton Industries,
Birmingham,  Alabama,  furnished data on the application of electrostatic
precipitators in the pulp and paper industry.

      Dr. Harry J. White,  Head of the Department of Applied Science,
Portland State University, served as  consultant on the program and con-
tributed  heavily in the review of precipitator fundamentals.

                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                ABSTRACT
      This manual is a comprehensive report on the state of technology
of electrostatic precipitation for participate emission control.  It is
intended to serve as a basic handbook on the subject of electrostatic
precipitation covering the entire system including fundamental theory,
design, operation, and application.

      The purpose e€ the manual is to provide a source of information
that will be of benefit to the researcher, manufacturer,  and user of
electrostatic precipitators.   The information and data are based on an
electrostatic precipitator systems study performed under Contract No.
CPA 22-69-73  for the National Air Pollution Control Administration.

      The systems study included  a review of literature pertaining to
electrostatic precipitation, a comprehensive review of precipitator
fundamentals,  a survey and review of the use of  precipitators in each of
eight major application areas, and a review of the potential for electro-
static precipitators in new applications.

      In order  to provide information useful to a wide range of users,
this manual is  organized to present a general review of the precipitation
process, with qualitative relationships  between the various precipitator
functions,  and  a detailed quantitative  analysis of each of the system
functions.  Particular emphasis is placed  on the validity of the theoretical
derivations in view  of the assumptions made and the significance  of the
interaction of variables of importance in precipitator operation.

      Further discussions include mechanical design considerations,
energization equipment,  gas flow,  operational problems, and the
current utilization of precipitators in the major application areas.
                                    -11-
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
                       PART I - FUNDAMENTALS
                                                              Page No.

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY	      1

   Corona Generation	      1
   Particle Charging	      6
   Particle Collection	      9
   Removal	     11
   Electrical Energization	     12
   Systems Analysis 	     13
   Design	     14
   Mechanical Components	     16
   Gas Flow	     17
   Resistivity	     18
   Measurement of Performance	     19
   Troubleshooting and Maintenance	     20
   Electrostatic Augmentation and Unusual Designs	     21

CHAPTER  1.   CORONA GENERATION	     23

   1. 1     Current Voltage Relationship	     30
   1. 2     Temperature and Pressure Effects	     34
   1.3     Practical Aspects of Corona Theory on
           Electrostatic Precipitation	     40
   1. 4     Practical Aspects of Corona Generation	     53
           Bibliography	     55

CHAPTER  2.   THE ELECTRIC FIELD	     57

   2.1     Space Charge Phenomena 	     57
   2. 2     Practical Aspects of the Electric Field	     66
           Bibliography	     68
CHAPTER 3.   PARTICLE CHARGING.
   3.1     Field Charging  	     70
   3. 2     Diffusion Charging	     78
                                  -111-
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
    3.3    Combination of Field and Diffusion Charging	     81
    3.4    Practical Aspects of Particle Charging	     85
           Bibliography	     95

CHAPTER 4.   PARTICLE COLLECTION	     96

    4.1    Particle Kinetics	     96
    4. 2    Particle Collection with Laminar Gas Flow	    103
    4.3    Particle Collection with Turbulent Gas Flow	    105
    4. 4    Factors Modifying the  Particle Collection
           in a Precipitator.	    114
    4. 5    Practical Aspects of Particle Collection	    117
    4.6    Recent Modifications to the Deutsch Equation	    118
           Bibliography	    123

CHAPTER 5.   GAS FLOW	    124

    5.1    Introduction	    124
    5.2    Straighteners	    138
    5. 3    Splitters. ,	    139
    5. 4    Transformation Splitters	    139
    5.5    Vanes	    141
    5. 6    Diffusion Plates	    144
    5.7    Modelling	    146
           Bibliography	    151

CHAPTER 6.   RAPPING AND REENTRAINMENT	    152

    6.1    Rapping	    152
    6.2    Reentrainment	    158
           Bibliography	    165

CHAPTER 7.   RESISTIVITY AND CONDITIONING	    166

    7.1    Volume Conduction	    166
    7. 2    Surface Conduction	    167
    7.3    Mechanisms of Surface Conditioning	
    7. 4    Field Conditioning Studies	
    7. 5    Moisture Conditioning	
    7.6    Chemical Conditioning	
           Bibliography	[[

                                  -iv-

-------
                                                                Page No.

CHAPTER 8.   ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR SYSTEMS
               ANALYSIS	      187

    8.1    Generalized Precipitator Model	      188
    8.2    Simplified System Model	      190
    8.3    Example Utilizing Existing Simplified System Model  .      193
    8. 4    Limitations of Existing Model	      199
    8.5    Model Verification	      200

CHAPTER 9.   DESIGN METHODOLOGY	      203

    9.1    Design Method 1	      203
    9.2    Design Method II	      214
           Bibliography	      217

CHAPTER 10.  MECHANICAL COMPONENTS	      218

   10.1    Tubular Type Precipitators	      218
   10.2    Plate Type Precipitators	      218
   10.3    Discharge Electrodes	      221
   10.4    Discharge Electrode Support	      227
   10.5    Collecting Electrodes	      229
   10.6    Electrode  Cleaning Equipment	      233
   10.7    Hopper Systems  	      239
   10.8    Dust Removal Systems	      239
           Bibliography	      241

CHAPTER 11.  POWER SUPPLIES AND CONTROLS	      242

   11.1    The Power System	      242
           Bibliography	      265

CHAPTER 12.  MEASUREMENTS	      266

   12.1    Measurement of Gas Flow and Efficiency	      266
   12. 2    Velocity and Gas Volume	      266
   12. 3    Determination of Dust Concentration	      268
   12.4    Computation	      272
   12.5    Sources of Error	      276
   12.6    Measurement of Resistivity	      288
           Bibliography	      297

                                   -v-
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                                             Page No.

CHAi TER 13.   TROUBLESHOOTING AND MAINTENANCE. .	     298

   13.1    Gas Flow	     301
   13.2    Rapping	     302
   13. 3    Hoppers and Ash Removal	     304
   13.4    Troubleshooting Techniques	     304
   13.5    Maintenance	     305

CHAPTER 14.   ELECTROSTATIC AUGMENTATION AND
               UNUSUAL PRECIPITATION DESIGNS	     311

   14.1    Wet Scrubbers	     311
   14. 2    Electrostatically Augmented Packed Bed Filters	     314
   14.3    Fabric Filter	     315
   14.4    Mechanical Collection	     315
   14. 5    Space Charge Precipitation	     316
          Bibliography	     322
                                -vi-

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
                                 PART I
figure No.                                                       Page No.

    1.1      Diagram of the Feedback Nature of the Avalanche
             Process	       29
    1. 2      Theoretical Relationship Between Corona
             Starting Voltage and Wire Size	       33
    1.3      Effect of Wire-to-Wire Spacing on Clean         j
             Electrode Corona Current	       35
    1.4      Variations in Clean Electrode Corona Starting
             Potential With Pressure and Temperature	       37
    1. 5      Electrical Characteristics of Air at 1500°F	       38
    1. 6      Current Voltage Relationships for 15-ft Wire and
             Pipe Precipitator at High  Pressure and High
             Temperature	 .       41
    1.7      Negative Corona Characteristics for Nitrogen-
             Oxygen  Mixtures With Clean Electrodes	       42
    1.8      Variation of Negative Corona Current With Applied
             Voltage for Nitrogen-Sulfur Dioxide Mixtures ....       43
    1.9      Variation in Negative Corona Current With Applied
             Voltage for Air-Water Vapor Mixtures at 400°F
             and Atmospheric Pressure	       44
    1.10     Electric Field and Charged Particle Distribution
             Within a Corona	       52

    3.1      Electric Field Modified by the Presence of an
             Uncharged Conducting Particle	       72
    3,2      Induced Electrostatic Charge in Particulate Due
             to Proximity of Ion	       73
    3.3      Electric Field After Particle Acquires a
             Saturation Charge	       74
    3.4      Number of Elementary Charges Vs. Ion Density
             and Time  for Various Theoretical Analyses	       83
    3.5      Particle Charging Characteristics	Number of
             Charges Vs.  Particle Size.  Comparison Between
             Hewitt's Experimental Data and Various Charging
             Theories	       84
                                   -vii-
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
Figure No.
    3.6      Number of Elementary Charges Vs. Charge
             Density - Time Product for 0. 06 jj, Radius ......          86
    3.7      Electric Field Variations as a Function of Time
             at a Particular Point in Space Caused by the
             Variation in the Applied Voltage from the Power
             Supply ......................................          87
    3.8      Charging Characteristics for Various Waveforms
             With 3 kV/cm Average Values .................          91
    3.9      Charge Vs.  Time in a Field of 3 kV/cm Average,
             With Charging Time Constant  as a Parameter
             Peak/ Average = 1 . 63  ........................          94

    4. 1      Free Body Diagram of Forces Acting on a
             Negatively Charged Particle in an Electrostatic
             Precipitator .................................          98
    4. 2      Acceleration Time Constant (T) as a Function of
             Particle Diameter ...........................         101
    4. 3      Length of Precipitator Required for 100% Collection
             for Idealized Laminar Gas Flow in a Pipe
             Precipitator of Radius,  R .....................         104
    4.4      Possible Gas Distribution in a Precipitator Duct         108
    4. 5      Assumed Gas Flow Distribution for Quality
             Factor Example .............................         113
    4.6      Negative Corona Voltage Current Characteristics
             in Air for a 15- foot Pipe, 20 cm Diameter, 0. 277
             cm WirelDiameter ...........................         116

    5.1      Air Friction Vs. Reynolds Number and Roughness       129
    5. 2      Collection Efficiency as a Function of Flow Velocity     133
    5. 3      Gas Velocity Profiles ...... . ..................         134
    5. 4      Gas Velocity Contour Plot ....................         135
    5. 5      Histogram Showing Statistical Velocity
             Distribution .................................         ^317
    5. 6      Elbow Loss as a Function of Radius Ratio ......         140
    5.7      Streamlined Turning Vane Elbow ........... .. . .         ^43

    6. 1      Acceleration to Remove Dust Down to a Given
             Remaining Thickness for Fly Ash in British
             Installations .................................
    6. 2      Shear (Parallel) Rapping Efficiency for Various
             Precipitated Dust Layers Having About 0. 2 Gram
             of Dust per sq in. ,  as a Function of Maximum
             Acceleration in Multiples of "g" ...............

                                   -viii-

-------
Figure No.                                                        Page No.

    6.3      Normal (Perpendicular) Hsippinjr KITiciency for
             Various Precipitated Dust Layers Having About
             0. 2 Gram of Dust per sq in.,  as a Function of
             Maximum Acceleration in  Multiples of "g"	          157
    6.4      Threshold Shear Velocity Vs. Particle Size ...          160

    7.1      Plots of Resistivity Vs.  I/kT	          168
    7.2      Experimental Values of Electron Activation
             Energy.	          169
    7.3      Resistivity of Bone-Dry Dusts at Elevated
             Temperatures	          170
    7.4      Effect of Humidity on Particle Resistivity	          172
    7. 5      Conditioned Fly Ash  Particle	CERL,
             England (20, OOOX)	          174
    7. 6      Unconditioned Fly Ash Particle	Low  Sulfur
             Coal (80, OOOX)	          176
    7.7      High-Temperature Psychrometric Chart	          178
    7.8      Schematic Diagram of SO3 Conditioning Plant.  .          181
    7.9      Effect of Ammonia Conditioning on Southern
             N.S.W. Fly Ash	          184

    8.1      Electrostatic Precipitator System Model	          189
    8.2      Electrostatic Precipitator System Model—Parts
             Simulated in Computer Program in Heavy Line          191
    8.3      Computer System Flow Diagram.	          194
    8.4      Input Particle Size Distribution  and Discrete
             Approximation	          196
    8. 5      Computed Efficiency Vs. Particle Size for Five
             Installations	          202

    9.1      Relationship between Precipitation Rate
             Parameter and Resistivity	          207
    9.2      Relationship between Precipitation Rate
             Parameter and Sulfur Content for Electric
             Utility Installations at a Temperature of 300°F.          208
    9.3      Collection Efficiency Vs. Power Rate	          210
    9.4      Relationship between Collection Efficiency and
             Sectionalization	          211
    9. 5      Linear Relationship between Precipitation Rate
             Parameter and Power Density for Fly Ash
             Collectors	          215
                                    -ix-
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
Figure No.                                                        Page Ncx

   10.1      A Single-Stage Vertical Wire and Pipe Unit	      219
   10. 2      Parallel Plate Precipitator	      220
   10. 3      Weighted Wire Corona Electrodes	      223
   10. 4      Typical Shapes of Stiff Discharge Electrodes	      225
   10. 5      Two Types of Support Structures for Corona Wires. .      226
   10. 6      High Temperature Support Bushings,  Style 1	      228
   10.7      High Temperature Support Bushings,  Style 2	      230
   10. 8      Various Types of Collection Electrodes  	      232
   10. 9      Typical Electromagnetic Rapper Assembly	      234
   10.10     Typical Electromagnetic Vibrator Assembly	      236
   10.11     Mechanical Single  Impact Rapper	      238

   11.1      The Power Supply  System for Modern Precipitators .      243
   11. 2      Full-Wave Mechanical Recitifier H-V Power Supply .      245
   11.3,     Vacuum Tube Rectifier	      246
   11.4      Spark Rate Control Circuit from Van Hoesen,  e\ al .,     249
   11. 5      Optimum Operating Voltage for a Single Section of a
             Precipitator.	,	      251
   11.6      Equivalent Circuit of the Precipitator Collection
             Electrode System	      251
   11.7      Time Response of the Precipitator Equivalent
             Circuit to Various Voltage Waveforms With  the
             Same Peak Amplitude	      256
   11.8      Half-Wave Mechanical Rectifier H-V Power Supply. .      258
   11. 9      Tube Rectifier H-V Power Supply	      260

   12.1      Sampling Points in a Round Duct	      269
   12. 2  -    Schematic Arrangement of Dust Sampling Apparatus.      273
   12. 3      Flow Lines in the  Vicinity of a Sampling Probe	      279
   12. 4      Accuracy of Anisokinetic Sampling	      280
   12. 5      Accuracy of Velocity Readings for Manometer
             Accuracy of ± a Inches Water Gage and Standard Air
             Density	      282
   12.6      Relationship between True Efficiency Vs.
             Calculated Efficiency	      289
   12.7      High Voltage Cell  for Measurement of Dust
             Resistivity	      291
   12. 8      Resistivity-Temperature Relations	      292
   12. 9      Resistivity Probe	      294
   12.10    Diagram of Apparatus	      295
   12.11    Resistivity Changes During Site Measurements on
             Four Different Power Stations	      296

   13.1      Relationship between Corona Power and Efficiency
             for Fly Ash Precipitators	      299

   14. 1      The Electrostatic  Force between a WJJL Water Droplet
             and a 0. 5ju Dust Particle Charged to Saturation in an
             Electric Field of 6 kV/cm	
                                    -x-

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES
                                 PART I
Table No.                                                      Page No.

   6.1       Erosion Situations	       163

   8.1       Input Parameters from Boiler	       192
   8. 2       Precipitator Parameters 	       192
   8. 3       Derived Quantities	       193
   8.4       Comparison between the Measured and Computed
             Collection Efficiency for Five Fly Ash Precipitators    201

   9.1       Representative Precipitation Rates for Various
             Applications	       205
   9. 2       Rapping Practices	       213

  12.1,       Comparison of Six  Measurement Standards	       267
  12, 2       Sources of Measurement Errors	       277
  12.3       Permissible Error Limits for Glass/Mercury
             Thermometers  	       283

  13.1       Typical Maintenance Schedule	       306
                                   -xi-
                                                   8OUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                          LIST OF SYMBOLS
                                PART I
    A = Collection electrode area or specific area of an object
    C = Constant or coefficient
   Cp = Current to charge participate
    D = Dust concentration or diffusion coefficient
    E = Electric field
    F = Force, Farad
    K = Aspect ratio, constant
LpLw = Length of precipitator or corona wire
    N = Densities of various quantities - number per units volume
    P = Perimeter, (probability
    Q = Quality factor or quantity
    R = Radius - specific dimension
    S = Surface area per gm of dust, circumference
    V = Voltage, ionization potential
    W = Weight of dust
    X = Fraction of molecules ionized
    a  =  Radius corona wire or dust particle
    b  =  Radius collection pipe,  wire arid pipe precipitator
    d  =  Air density, relative
    e  =  Electronic charge
     f  =  Wire roughness factor, reentrainment factor
    h  =  Height of plates,  velocity head
     i  =  Current, per unit length
     j  =  Current, per unit area
    k  =  Boltzmann's constant, coefficient
    In  =  Natural logarithm
    n  =  Number of items per unit time
    p  =  Velocity pressure
    q  =  Electrical  charge
    r  =  Radius or reduction factor
     t  =  Time
    v  =  Velocity
   Vg  =  Volume flow rate
    w  =  Migration velocity or precipitation rate  parameter
                                 -xii-
                                             SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
    a -' lonization coefficient, acceleration,  erosion coefficient
    j3 =  Constant erosion coefficient
    y =  Secondary emission coefficient
    6 -  Boundary layer thickness
    A =  Increment
e, €Q -•  Relative dielectric constant,  permittivity of free space
    T/ =  Collection efficiency, viscosity
    jU =  Mobility
    p -  Resistivity, space charge density, gas density
    CT =  Conductivity
    £ =  Summation
    T =  Time constant
    X =  Concentration ratio
    V2 r- Laplacian operator
                                  -X111-

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
                    PART II  -  APPLICATION AREAS
                                                                Page No.

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY	      324

   Electric Power Generation	      324
   Pulp and Paper	      328
   Iron and Steel Industry	      330
   Rock Products	      337
   Chemical Industry . . .'	      340
   Municipal Incinerators	      343
   Petroleum Industry	      344
   Nonferrous Metals	      345
   High Temperature, High Pressure Gas Cleaning	      346
   New Application Areas	      347

CHAPTER 15.   ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS IN THE
                ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY	      348

   15.1     Fly Ash Characteristics	      351
   15.2     Flue Gas Characteristics	      360
   15. 3    Historical Development of Fly Ash Precipitators	      363
   15. 4     Design of Fly Ash Precipitators	      365
   15.5    Summary of Precipitator Operating Conditions	      383
   15.6     Precipitator Installations and Economics	      393
   15.7     Trends	 .	      408
            Bibliography	      416

CHAPTER 16.   ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS IN THE
                PULP AND PAPER  INDUSTRY.	      418

   16.1     Process Descriptions	      421
   16. 2     Character of Recovery Boiler Particulate Emission .       427
   16. 3     Character of Sulfate Process Flue Gases	      432
   16.4    Historical Developments of Electrostatic
            Precipitators for Recovery Furnaces	       40 r
   16.5     Precipitator Applications	      ^g
   16. 6    Summary of Precipitator Operating Conditions	       455

                                  -xiv-
                                                  80UTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTES

-------
                                                               Page No.

   16. 7    Assessment of the State of the Art	     462
   16.8    General Observations and Discussion of Trends	     467
           Bibliography	     473

CHAPTER 17.  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS IN THE
               IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY	     474

   17.1    Introduction	     474
   17. 2    Application to Coke Ovens	     476
   17. 3    Application to Sinter Plants	     487
   17. 4    Application to Blast Furnaces	     502
   17. 5    Application to Open Hearth Furnaces	     529
   17. 6    Application to Basic Oxygen Converters	     546
   17. 7    Application to Electric Arc Furnaces	     567
   17.8    Application to Scarfing Machines	     584
   17. 9    Application to Iron Cupolas	     592
           Bibliography	     604

CHAPTER 18.  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS IN THE
               ROCK PRODUCTS INDUSTRY	     609

   18.1    Manufacture of Portland Cement	     609
   18. 2    Character of Emissions from Cement Kilns	     615
   18.3    Electrostatic Precipitators for Control of Cement
           Dusts	     621
   18.4    Electrostatic Precipitators for Gypsum Industry. . . .     640
           Bibliography	     659

CHAPTER 19.  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS IN THE
               CHEMICAL INDUSTRY	     660

   19.1    Major Fields of Application	     660
   19. 2    Sulfuric Acid Production Processes	     660
   19.3    Design and Operating Parameters for Sulfuric Acid
           Mist Precipitators	     666
   19.4    Sulfuric Acid Mist Precipitator Installations and
           Cost Data	     675
   19. 5    Precipitators for the Elemental Phosphorus
           Industry	     684
   19. 6    Precipitators for the Phosphoric Acid Industry	     704
   19. 7    Precipitators for the Carbon Black Industry	     722
           Bibliography	     728

                                  -xv-

-------
                                                              Page No.

CHAPTER 20,  THE APPLICATION OF ELECTROSTATIC
               PRECIPITATORS IN CLEANING MUNICIPAL
               INCINERATOR DUSTS	      729

   20.1    Types of Incinerators	      729
   20.2    Incinerator Capacities	      730
   20.3    Refuse Properties	      731
   20.4    Emission Properties	      732
   20.5    Incinerator Emission Control	      737
   20. 6    Use of Electrostatic Precipitators on Municipal
           Incinerators  	      740
   20.7    Economics	      752
           Bibliography	      754

CHAPTER 21.  ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS IN THE
               PETROLEUM INDUSTRY	      755

   21.1    Introduction	      755
   21.2    Catalytic Cracking	      756
   21.3    Detarring	      761
   21.4    Development of Electrostatic Precipitators in the
           Petrochemical Industry	      768
           Bibliography	      785

CHAPTER 22.  THE APPLICATION OF ELECTROSTATIC
               PRECIPITATORS IN THE NONFERROUS
               METALS INDUSTRY	      786

   22.1    Historical Development	      786
   22.2    Nonferrous Metal Processing	      788
   22. 3    Electrolytic Reduction of Aluminum 	      793
   22. 4    Production of Primary Copper	      799
   22. 5    Production of Primary Lead	      810
   22.6    Zinc  Reduction	      g^g
   22. 7    Summary of Precipitator Operation Conditions	      g22
           Bibliography	      836
                                  -xvi-
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                                           Page No.
CHAPTER 23.   THE APPLICATION OF ELECTROSTATIC
               PRECIPITATORS TO THE CLEANING OF HIGH

23.1
23 2

23.3

23.4

CHAPTER
24.1

PRESSURE, HIGH TEMPERATURE GASES
High Pressure, High Temperature Processes 	
Influence of Temperature and Pressure on
Precipitator Performance 	
Precipitators for High Temperature, High Pressure
Operation 	
Cleaning Of Natural Gas in Pipelines 	
Bibliography 	
24. NEW PRECIPITATOR APPLICATIONS 	
Application of Electrostatic Precipitators 	
Bibliography 	 	
837
837

838

840
841
844
845
856
875
                               -xvii-

-------
                   DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY OF PART I
      Electrostatic precipitation utilizes the forces acting on electrically
charged particles in the presence of an electric field to effect the separation
of solid or liquid aerosols from a gas stream.  In the precipitation process,
dust suspended in the  gas is electrically charged and passed through an
electric field where electrical forces cause the particles to migrate toward
the collection surface.  The dust is separated from the gas by retention on
the collection electrode and subsequently removed from the precipitator.
Various physical configurations are used to accomplish these basic functions
of charging,  collection, and removal,  depending upon the type of application
and properties of the  dust and gas.

      While particles  in a gas stream normally have a small inherent elec-
tric charge,  it is orders of magnitude too small for effective electrostatic
collection.  Consequently,  the precipitation process must provide  a means
for particle charging.  In all commercial precipitator applications, the
charging is accomplished by means of a high-voltage, direct-current
corona.
CORONA GENERATION

      Corona,  as applied to electrostatic precipitators,  is a gas discharge
phenomenon associated with the ionization of gas molecules by electron
collision in regions of high electric field strength.   The process of corona
generation requires a nonuniform electric field,  which is obtained by the
use of a small diameter Wire as one electrode and  a plate or cylinder as
the other electrode.  The  application of  a high voltage to this electrode
configuration results in a  high electric field near the wire.   The electric
field decreases inversely  with the radius from the  wire  surface.

      The corona process is initiated by the presence of electrons in
the high field region near  the wire.  Electrons for  corona initiation are
supplied from natural radiation or other sources and, since they are in
a region of high electric field, they are  accelerated to high velocities
and possess sufficient energy so that on  impact with gas molecules in the
region, they release orbital electrons from gas molecules.  The additional

                                     -1-
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -2-
free electrons are also accelerated and enter into the ionization process.
This avalanche process continues until the electric field decreases to the
point that the electrons released do not  acquire sufficient energy for
ionization.

     Within the region defined by the corona glow discharge, where ioniza-
tion is taking place, there are free  electrons and positive ions resulting
from electron impact ionization.  The behavior of these charged particles
depends upon the polarity of the electrodes, and the corona is termed
negative corona if the discharge  electrode is negative,  or positive corona
if the discharge electrode is positive.  Both positive and negative corona
are used in industrial gas cleaning applications; however,  the negative
corona is most prevalent within the temperature range  of most industrial
applications.

      In the case of the negative  corona, positive ions generated in the
corona region as a result of electron impact are attracted  toward the nega-
tive wire electrode and electrons toward the positive plate or cylinder
electrode.  Beyond the corona glow region,  the electric field diminishes
rapidly, and if electronegative gases are present,  electrons will be
captured by the gas molecules on impact.   The negative ions thus
generated move toward the collection electrode and serve as the principal
means for charging the dust.

      In the corona process,  there must be a source of electrons to initiate
and maintain the avalanche process. The electrons are supplied from
naturally occurring ionizing radiation,  photoionization due to the presence
of the  corona glow,  and,  in the case of high temperature operations,  from
thermal ionization at the  electrode surface.  For negative  corona, elec-
trons are also provided by secondary emission from the impacts between
the positive ions and the discharge electrode.  Cosmic  and terrestrial
radiation provide approximately 20  ion-electron pairs per  cubic centimeter
of gas  per second.

      Mobilities of the various charge carriers play an  important role in
the corona generation process.  Electron mobility in high fields is
approximately 400 times  that for ions.   In the negative  corona case   the
electron mobility is such that sparking would occur when the field required
to initiate corona is reached unless the  electrons are attached to gas mole-
cules to form a stabilizing space charge.

      In most industrial gas cleaning applications, there are sufficient
quantities of electronegative gases,  such as oxygen, so that practically all

-------
                                    -3-
of the electrons are attached to gas molecules.  Gases such as nitrogen,
helium, argon,  etc., do not form negative ions, and hence  a stable
negative corona is not possible in these gases.

      In positive corona,  the electrons generated by the  avalanche process
flow toward the collection electrode.  Since the positive  ions are the charge
carriers, they serve to provide an effective space charge,  and the presence
of an electronegative gas is not required for positive corona.  Sources of
electrons for initiating and maintaining avalanche in a positive corona are
cosmic radiation and photoionization due to the corona glow.

      Positive  and negative corona differ in several important aspects.  In
appearance,  the positive  corona is a rather uniform sheath surrounding the
discharge electrode.  In contrast,  negative corona  appears as localized
discharges from points on a clean wire and as localized  tufts  along the dust-
coated electrode.   The voltage-current characteristics of the negative
corona are superior to those of positive corona at the temperature at which
most precipitators operate.  Higher operating voltages and currents can
be reached prior to disruptive sparking.   It is postulated that a spark or
arc breakdown in the interelectrode space  occurs by formation of a
streamer originating at the positive electrode surface.   In the positive
corona, the origin of the  streamer would be at the surface of  the discharge
wire, and hence in a high field region.  In the negative corona, the positive
electrode is  the collection plate and the field near this surface is  con-
siderably less  than at the discharge electrode;  hence a higher voltage
would be required for spark propagation.

      Negative corona is  accompanied by the generation  of ozone,  and there-
fore is  usually not used for cleaning air in inhabited space. However,
most industrial gas cleaning precipitators  utilize negative corona because
of its inherently superior electrical characteristics which leads to increased
efficiency at the temperatures at which they are used.

      Geometry of the electrodes,  gas composition, and gas conditions have
important influences on corona generation.  The diameter of the discharge
wire and the electrode spacing determine the voltage gradient, and hence
the variation in electric field strength.  The electric field varies  as the
reciprocal of the radius near a small diameter wire.  Hence,  with a very
small wire, the electric field near the surface can  be quite high,  often in
the range of  50-100 kV/cm.  The avalanche process requires the  presence
of a high electric  field over a given distance.  In general,  the smaller
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -4-
diameter wire requires a higher electric field strength for initiation of
corona.  For a given spacing,  however, the onset of corona occurs at a
lower voltage for the smaller diameter wire.  Also, for a given voltage,
higher currents are obtained with smaller diameter discharge electrodes.

      Temperature and pressure influence the generation of corona by
changing the gas density.  In the avalanche process, the time available
for accelerating an electron between collisions is a function of gas
density.  With increased molecular spacing,  higher velocities can be
achieved between collisions.  Thus, ionizing energy can be achieved with
low electric fields for low gas densities.

      A second  effect, in the case of the negative corona, is that the
increased molecular spacing results in the penetration of free electrons
further into the interelectrode region before  capture to form a negative
ion.  This results in an increased average mobility in the interelectrode
space, and hence a higher current.  Additionally.,  at very high tempera-
tures (above about 1500°F) thermionic emission increases, further
increasing the number of free  electrons and the effective average charge
mobility.   These effects reduce the voltage required for sparkover, so
that at high temperatures, positive  corona would perhaps give superior
voltage-cur rent relationships and improved collection efficiency since
electrons move toward the discharge  electrode in positive corona.

      Corona generation studies of a basic nature are most often made
with clean electrodes under laboratory conditions.  These conditions are
highly idealized in comparison to industrial precipitators. In practical
precipitators, the presence of a dust  laden gas has several effects on
corona generation.  First,  the dust entering the interelectrode space
becomes charged by attachment of negative or positive ions.   Because
of the much lower mobility of the charged dust,  it constitutes  a signifi-
cant space charge.  The magnitude  of the space charge depends upon the
size and quantity of  the dust and the magnitude of its charge.   The effect
of the space charge  is to reduce the electric  field in the vicinity of the
corona glow region and thus it tends to quench the corona and  reduce the
current.  This effect is particularly significant at the inlet section of a
precipitator where dust  concentrations are highest.  Special electrode
shapes are often used to minimize  this space charge problem  at the
inlet section.

      A second  important consideration of the effects of dust on corona
generation is the deposits  formed on both collection and discharge

-------
                                     -5-
electrodes.  On the collection electrode,  dust deposits alter the electric
field and sparking conditions as a result of the voltage drop within the dust
layer.  This effect limits the voltage and current at which the precipitator
can operate, and is its chief influence on corona generation.

      Dust deposits also form on the discharge electrode in operating
precipitators.  This deposit can be quite heavy in the  case  of some types
of dust.  The effect on corona can be considerable depending  on the nature
of the deposit and the electrical properties of the dust.  If the dust resis-
tivity is reasonably low, the effect of the deposit will  be to effectively
increase the diameter of the discharge wire.  This results in higher voltage
required for corona initiation or reduced corona current for a given voltage.
If the dust deposit is uneven, an uneven distribution of corona along the
length of the wire may result.

      If the dust resistivity is high, the effect generally would be to reduce
corona current for a given voltage.  However,  if the deposit is somewhat
porous, breakdown of the gas  in the interstitial region can  occur and the
effect of the deposit may be reduced.

      The current in a precipitator is  carried by free  electrons, ions,  and
charged dust particles.   The magnitude of the current carried by each of
these is related to the number densities  of the carrier, the mobility of the
carrier, and the electric field.  Mobilities are related to the  various physi-
cal parameters of the charged particle,  but primarily to the charge-to-
mass ratio of the  carrier.   Electrons, with their low  mass, have the highest
mobility of all the current  carriers (/ie~750 cm2/volts sec).   Oxygen ions
would have  a lower  mobility, about 1/400 that of an  electron (fj.o~ ~1.9 cm2/
volts sec),  and charged dust particles would have the  lowest mobility of all
the current carriers (in the range of 0. 02  cm2/volts sec).   These mobilities
are for conditions normally encountered in commercial installations.  It is
thus apparent that for a given  electric field,  the current carried by each of
the carriers is in proportion to their mobilities for  the same  number den-
sities.  For a  negative corona, the number densities of the charged parti-
cles change in traversing the glow region from the discharge  electrode
surface.  At the surface, the positive ion density is  greatest,  Since all of
the positive ions from the avalanche process flow to the discharge electrode.
At the boundary of the corona  glow region, ion generation ceases;  hence
the concentration of positive ions is zero beyond that point.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -6-
      The number of free electrons at the wire surface is minimal and
increases, because  of the avalanche process,  to a maximum at the bound-
ary of the corona glow region.  Moving into the quiescent zone,  free elec-
trons are captured by the electronegative gas  molecules.  The probability
of electron capture is high due to the number of gas molecules present, so
that the electron density rapidly decreases b.eyond the corona glow boundary.

      As the electrons from ,the corona  are captured by the gas mjolecules
to form negative ions, the negative ion concentration increases.   Traversing
further into the interelectrode space, the negative ions attach to the  dust
particles present to form charged particles.   The number of free ions
present then decreases as they are consumed in the particle charging
procesa.  A  considerable fraction of the negative ions present go to
charging the dust particles, although sdue to the difference in mobilities,
the percentage of the current due to bound ions is small.

      The currents  carried by these various carriers  can be determined by
their number densities,  mobilities, and the electric field strength.   It
should be remembered,  however,  that the number densities of the various
carriers, as well as current,  are important in analysis of precipitator
operation.
PARTICLE CHARGING

      There are two physical mechanisms by which gas ions impart charge
to dust particles in the precipitator.  Particles in an electric field cause
localized distortion of the field so that electric field lines intersect the
particles.   Ions present in the field tend to travel in the direction of maxi-
mum voltage gradient,  which is along electric field lines.  Thus,  ions will
be intercepted by the dust particles, resulting in a net charge now to the
particle.  The ion will be held to  the dust particle by an induced image
charge .force between the ion aad  dust particle. 
-------
                                     -7-
      The time required for a particle to acquire a saturation charge is an
important factor that is often neglected in precipitation theory.  Field de-
pendent charging  may be described by an asymptotic final value function,
and is dependent upon ion density and mobility.  If a single particle is intro-
duced into a high  ion density field,  charging takes place in milliseconds.
However,  charging times by the field-dependent regime can be appreciable
under practical conditions of large  dust loading and  low  currents.

      For small particles (diameter <0.2/i),  the field-dependent charging
mechanism is less important, and collision between the particles and gas
ions is  governed primarily by thermal motion of the ion.  Equations  de-
scribing the rate  of charging can be derived assuming that charging rate
is independent of  the magnitude of the electric field.  Since ion movement
is so greatly influenced by the electric field, the assumption obviously
generates considerable error.  However, the factors influencing charging
rate can be seen under this assumption to be particle diameter,  free ion
density, and thermal velocity of the ions.

      Since the range of thermal velocities has no upper boundary, there
is no saturation value associated with diffusion charging.  However,  as the
charge  on a particle increases, the probability of impact decreases,  so
that there is a decreasing charging rate  associated with an increasing par-
ticle  charge.   This  second charging process is called diffusion charging.

      Recent work in the area of diffusion charging has been directed toward
obtaining better agreement between experimentally determined values of dif-
fusion charging and those predicted by theory.   Studies of the influence of
electric field have been made on the basis of approximate solutions to the
equations that include the effect of the electric field.

      In practical precipitators, field-dependent charging is usually  of most
interest,  but  in some applications particles are present in the range  where
diffusion charging is the predominant mode  (<0.2jjt  diameter) as well as the
area in which both mechanisms are significant.   Unified charging equations
have been  developed covering the size range where both charging regimes
are important,  and results agree reasonably well with experimental  labor-
atory values.

      Particle charging theory indicates several important factors govern-
ing precipitator performance.  Since the magnitude  of the particle charge
is dependent upon the magnitude of the electric field in the field-dependent
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -8-
mode,  it is important that field strength be kept, as high as practical
the region where charging takes place.
in
      A second factor of importance is the rate of charging of the particles.
Practical precipitators generally introduce heavy concentrations of uncharged
dust in the inlet section of the precipitator. Calculations show that the num-
ber of ions required to charge this dust to its  saturation value may be large,
hence the number of free ions present may be substantially reduced and
charging times are not insignificant.

      The waveform of the applied voltage is significant,  as it influences the
peak  value of the electric field and the charging time.   The saturation value
of the particle charge is determined by the peak value of the electric field.
However, charging only occurs during the interval of time that the applied
field  exceeds the self-field corresponding to the charge on the particle.
Consequently, longer  times will be required to reach saturation for a varying
voltage than  for a pure d-c voltage.  However, the varying voltage is
preferable for spark quenching and permits operation at a higher average
voltage.

      The electric field in a precipitator determines the maximum value
of the particle charge due to field-dependent charging and also the  force
acting on a charged particle.  Since the electrical field enters the collection
efficiency equations effectively as a squared term, it is important  that the
magnitude of the field be  maintained as  high as practical.

      The electric field strength is determined by the electrostatic compo-
nent,  which is related to  the precipitator  geometry and the  applied voltage;
and by the space charge component, which is related to the presence of
charged particles (ions and charged particulate) in the interelectrode space.
The design of the precipitator can be varied to alter the geometry of the
discharge electrode and the electrode spacing. These factors can  determine
the magnitude of the electrostatic component.  Variations in electrode
geometry can also alter the corona current, which in turn influences the
electric field by changing the space charge contribution.  Equations des-
cribing the electric field for clean electrodes  have been developed from
classical  electrical theory.  Utilizing  these equations, it is  possible to
predict the field at any location, assuming clean electrodes.

      In a practical precipitator,  dust accumulations on the collection elec-
trodes limit  the maximum voltage, and  hence  the electric field strength  at
which the precipitator can operate.  The voltage drop across  the dust

-------
                                     -9-
layer is dependent upon the corona current density, the electrical resistivity
of the dust, and the thickness of the dust deposit.  For high resistivity dusts,
the voltage drop across the collected dust  layer can be in the neighborhood of
10-20 kV,  assuming reasonable current densities and dust  deposit thicknesses.
Obviously,  the electrical energization equipment must be capable of provid-
ing sufficient voltage to accommodate this voltage drop,  while maintaining
adequate voltage across the interelectrode spaces.  The effect of the resistivity
of the dust layer,  however, is more severe than its influence on power supply
voltage.  The electric field in the dust layer can be quite high for high resis-
tivity dust.  This  high field region at the anode surface can lead to sparkover
at lower applied voltages,  thus limiting the maximum operating voltage of
the precipitator.

      A second condition associated with high dust resistivity can also influ-
ence particle charging and the magnitude of the electric field.  Once spark-
ing occurs, a crater is formed in the  dust layer, and current densities in
the localized area can result in localized electric fields that are sufficiently
high to initiate a corona emanating from the base of the crater.  This cor-
ona  results in positive ion  production  and, due to the direction of the elec-
tric field,  these ions flow toward the discharge electrode.  Collisions with
dust particles tend to charge them with opposite polarity to that required
for collection.  Also, collision with negative ions tends to neutralize them,
reducing the ion density in the interelectrode  space.

      If dust resistivity is  further increased,  a diffuse corona glow will
appear over the large areas of the dust surface.  Under these conditions
the positive ion production by the reverse  corona is sufficient to completely
disrupt the charging process, and effective precipitation is not possible
under these conditions.
PARTICLE COLLECTION

      The forces acting on a charged particle in a precipitator are gravi-
tational, inertial, electrical, and aerodynamic.  The latter two are the prin-
cipal ones of importance in electrostatic precipitation.

      If a particle is suspended  in a laminar gas flow stream in a pipe and
wire precipitator,  a force  due to the electric field and particulate charge
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -10-
will act on the particle in the direction of the collection electrode.  This
force is opposed by the viscous drag force of the gas.  In sufficient time,
which is short for small particles,  the particle would reach a terminal
velocity at which point the electrical and viscous drag forces would be
equal.  In precipitator terminology,  this is called the migration velocity.
The other force acting on the particle is the aerodynamic force by the gas
stream.   The motion of the particle will be along the line defined by the
vector sum of these two forces.  Under laminar flow, all particles would
be collected in a given length of the precipitator and the collection efficiency
for shorter lengths would be linearly related to precipitator length.
                       j
      In practical size precipitators,  however,  laminar flow is practically
never achieved.  Consequently; the turbulent gas flow causes particles to
follow a random path through the  precipitator.  The magnitude of the forces
due to the turbulent gas flow is large compared to the electrical forces.
However, at the boundary layer the gas flow is laminar and particles enter-
ing the boundary layer will be collected.  The collection efficiency is there-
fore related to the probability of  a particle entering the boundary layer.
Studies by Anderson,  Deutsch, and White of particle collection in a turbu-
lent gas stream have shown theoretically that collection efficiencies are
exponentially related to the collection surface, the gas volume handled,
and the migration velocity of a particle.   The equation,  known generally as
the Deutsch-Anderson equation,is of the form 77 = 1 - exp (- —w).
                                                           Vg

      The derivations of the efficiency equation are based on the assump-
tion  that there is a reasonably constant distribution of the particles in any
cross section of the precipitator  due to turbulent mixing of the gas.  In
addition to this assumption,  there are several basic conditions that apply to
the derivation of the equation.  Utilizing the relation for the theoretical
                       2en En Ep a
migration velocity w = —2—s—£_ generally associated with the efficiency

equation neglects any contribution of diffusion charging.  Also,  the calcula-
tion is based on a single particle  size.  The equation also includes no term
to account for reentrainment of collected dusts, uneven distribution of the
gas flow,  or other factors inherent in practical precipitator operation

      A principal practical use of the Deutsch-Anderson equation has been in
relating measured collection efficiency to the collecting surface area and ea.
volume.  In such cases, the term w as calculated from the Deutsch-Ande
equation is a parameter,  rather than the migration velocity given by'the   r"
cal considerations.  In this case, it is called effective migration velo 't    *

-------
                                    -11-
or precipitation rate parameter.  The term is useful in describing the
effectiveness with which a given dust can be collected,  and is widely used
in design and analysis of precipitators.

      From a theoretical as well as a practical  standpoint,  the distribution
of particles within the precipitator  is important.  There is some evidence
to indicate that particle distribution within the precipitator may not be uni-
form and that diffusional forces may also play a role in collection efficiency.
REMOVAL

      Once collected,  the dust or liquid aerosol must be removed from-
the precipitator.  This can be accomplished by flowing a liquid down the col-
lection electrode to wash the collected dust,  or by rapping the electrodes
to impart an acceleration to dislodge the dust, which falls into a hopper
for subsequent removal.  Liquid aerosols normally  coalesce and drain
from the plates so that removal is not a problem.

      In dry removal systems,  rapping of the collection electrode to remove
the dust is normally done on a periodic basis.  Successful rapping depends
upon accumulation of sufficient thickness of material on the plate so that it
falls in large agglomerates  into the hopper.  There  is always some reen-
trainment of the dust so that effective rapping must  minimize the amount
of material rcentrained in the gas stream.

      The accelerations required to remove the collected dust vary with the
properties of the dust and gas stream.  Forces of cohesion and adhesion
consist of molecular (van der Waals),  electrical, and mechanical forces.
Some dusts adhere tenaciously to the collection surface and require sub-
stantial accelerations to  dislodge them.  Variations in operating tempera-
ture, gas composition, or both,  can alter the forces required  for success-
ful rapping.  Electrical forces, which are related to current density and
dust resistivity,  are also significant in holding the collected material to
the plate,  and therefore affect the forces required for rapping.  Since
current densities are higher at the discharge electrode than at the collecting
electrode,  greater forces are often required to maintain them relatively
free of dust deposits than are required at the collection plates.
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -12-
      Reentrainment of the dust during rapping is evidenced by increased
dust loadings at the precipitator exit following a rap.  To minimize this
effect, only small sections of the precipitator are rapped at one time.
ELECTRICAL ENERGIZATION

      The function of electrical energization is to provide optimum elec-
trical conditions for particle charging and collection.  The energization
equipment consists of a transformer to step up the voltage from the normal
supply line to between 30-100 kV which is required for precipitation.   The
particular voltage is a function of electrode (wire-to-plate) spacing, and
the spacing is generally chosen to minimize the influence of misalignments
of the electrodes resulting from faulty construction,  warping, etc. A
rectifier,  usually of the vacuum tube or silicon type,  converts the alter-
nating voltage to d-c to give unipolar ions.  An automatic control  system is
usually provided to maintain optimum voltage conditions for precipitation.
The control system  can operate from spark rate, secondary or primary
voltage, or other parameters.

      The power capacity of the energization equipment is determined by
the precipitator size or quantity of gas flow, design efficiency of the pre-
cipitator, and properties of the dust and gas.  The manner in which the
power is applied varies with the application, and the policies of  the equip-
ment manufacturer.  The principal variable is the number of independently
powered precipitator sections  that make up the total power supply.
Increasing the number of sections by using a large number of smaller
power supplies is advantageous if the the precipitator is operating in a spark-
limited mode, as a higher voltage can be maintained for a given spark rate.
The size of the power supply also determines the internal impedance of the
supply, hence large power supplies  with high current capacities  have low
impedances, which are not as  effective in spark quenching as the smaller,
high impedance  supplies.  Smaller power supply sections also tend to
minimize effects of plate misalignment or other localized disturbances.
Finally on large systems,  the influence of an outgage  of a section of the  pre-
cipitator is not as pronounced  in systems comprised of smaller  power
supply sections if many independent sections are used.

      Analysis of the electrical characteristics of a precipitator shows that
it consists primarily of a parallel capacitive and resistive load,  the value of
which is determined by the  corona current and voltage.  The value of the capa-
citance is large  enough to maintain the voltage at a high level between cycles

-------
                                   -13-
even though the power supply is unfiltered.  The electrical characteristics
of the dust deposit also influence  the electrical operation of precipitators.
The effect of the filtering characteristics of the dust layer is to smooth
out voltage fluctuations so that higher peak voltages can be applied for a
given spark rate if the voltage waveform has a high rise rate. On the other
hand, charging times  may be increased by these voltage waveform altera-
tions, hence for the optimum design,  both effects must be considered.
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

      Despite its seeming simplicity, the interaction of the variables makes
it difficult to analyze the performance of a precipitator without considering
the system as a whole.  The systems analysis approach permits a review
of the various parameters controlling system performance and permits a
rational basis for precipitator design and analysis.

      A simplified systems analysis has been developed which relates most
of the important variables and permits a computerized method of precipita-
tor analysis or performance evaluation.

      The systems model is programmed to determine the collection effi-
ciency for each discrete particle size range for each increment of length
of the precipitator by calculating the following: the field strength as a func-
tion of radius at each increment of distance through the precipitator,  the
saturation charge on the dust, the actual charge on the dust at each incre-
ment from considerations of the free ion densities,  and the amount of
material in each size range that is removed at each increment.  From this,
the total collection efficiency can be calculated.

      Comparisons of efficiencies predicted from the systems model with
those measured in field tests show good agreement, except where unusual
conditions, such as excessive  reentrainment,  were suspected.

      The general philosophy behind the systems model is that it permits a
satisfactory calculation of performance based on known theory, whereas
theoretical calculations based on very elementary or simplified theory do
not. Refinement of the model to include such factors as reentrainment,
voltage-cur rent characteristics,  sparkover effects, spatial distribution
of the dust, diffusion charging, and gas distribution, should permit a
more theoretically correct analysis and should give better agreement
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -14-
between measured and calculated perl'ormance.
DESIGN

      The design of precipitators involves the determination of precipi-
tator size and electrical energization equipment required to give a
desired efficiency,  the design of a gas flow system to provide acceptable
gas flow quality, structural design of the precipitator shell and supports,
selection of the rapping equipment,  and selection  of the electrode config-
uration.

      Present design methodology is generally based upon empirical
relations,  the values of which have been obtained  from experience with
similar applications.  There are several approaches to the selection of
the precipitator size.   In general, these methods  involve the selection of
a precipitation rate parameter and determination  of the collection plate
area required from the  Deutsch-Anderson equation or from  design curves
based upon field experience.  The precipitation rate parameter varies for
different applications  and often varies considerably within the same appli-
cation area due to variations in gas and dust properties.

      Selection of the  precipitation rate parameter can be made on the
basis of experience with similar installations or from experimentally
derived curves relating precipitation rate parameters to dust properties.
For many applications,'  the range of precipitation rate  parameter varia-
tions is small (of the order of ± 10%).  In such cases, the uncertainty in
plate area requirements is of the same magnitude.  In  other instances,
variations can be as high as 400-500%,  so that some  method for reducing
the uncertainty is highly desirable.   In general, some property of the
effluent from the industrial process has  been related to precipitation rate
parameter and an empirical relationship  is derived to  predict the value of
the precipitation rate  parameter.  In the  case of fly ash precipitators,
sulfur content of the coal and resistivity of the dust are commonly used to
establish  this value.  Particle size distribution is another significant
variable,  and curves relating precipitation rate parameter with any other
variable should be  modified to compensate for particle size variations if
sufficient data are  available.

      Power requirements for a precipitator vary with collection efficiency.
Selection of the  power requirements is generally based on curves relating
efficiency with corona power per unit volume of gas flow (watts/cfm). These
curves  are experimentally developed for each type of application  and vary

-------
                                    -15-
with dust properties.  These curves are usually based on total delivered
secondary  power, and power supply capacity is selected on the basis of a
power supply efficiency (from 60-75%) and the standard power supply size
that will meet the efficiency requirements.

      Sectionalization is also based on empirical information derived from
experience.  These curves must be consistent with those based on power
requirements and on relationships involving collection surface area, since
the same efficiencies can be achieved through the use of fewer sections
and greater collection area for installations operating in a spark rate
limited mode.

      Design of the gas flow system is generally based on model studies
with large  systems,  and its importance to good precipitation cannot be
overemphasized.

      Selection  of the number of rappers, type of electrodes,  etc. ,  varies
among manufacturers and with the type of dust being collected.  Struc-
tural design is relatively straightforward.

      One  of the principal difficulties encountered by the users of electro-
static precipitators is the evaluation of bids for specific installations.
Although precipitator bids are based on guaranteed performance,  there
are many examples of precipitator installations that fail to meet design
performance by a wide margin.  It is not uncommon for bids to vary con-
siderably in the collection surface area, the amount of power and degree
of electrical Sectionalization,  and the type of gas flow distribution systems.
The user is therefore faced with the problem of evaluating the adequacy
of each design for meeting his requirements.  The ability to interpret bids
requires experience  with the particular type of dust or a method of assess-
ing the effect of the design variations on performance.

      A  technique for evaluating design parameters for given  dust and gas
conditions  has been developed based on the method of regression analysis.
Based on a group of approximately 75 tests on 20 installations, equations
predicting  the precipitation rate parameter as functions of gas and fuel
properties have been developed.  An overall correlation coefficient  of
about 0. 85 has been obtained,  with maximum uncertainties of about  25%
in the precipitation rate parameter for fly ash precipitators.  This is
rather good agreement since design and performance parameters may  vary
considerably more than for fly  ash collection.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -16-
MECHANICAL COMPONENTS

      The two general types of precipitators currently used are the tubular
and plate types.  The tubular precipitator consists of cylindrical collection
electrodes with discharge electrodes located on the axis of the cylinder.  Gas
to be cleaned passes through the annular space between electrodes and the
dust is collected on the outer cylinder.  This type construction is used in
wet electrode systems, in high-pressure, high-temperature applications,
in some types of precipitators collecting liquid aerosol particles, and for
small dry collection installations.

      The plate type precipitator consists of parallel collecting plates with
discharge electrodes located between the plates.  Collecting electrode plates
are usually 12 to 40 feet high and spaced 6 to 12 inches apart.  The length of
the ducts in the direction of gas travel can vary according to the precipitator
design.  Total length can be from around 12 to 24 feet or longer for very
large installations.

      Mechanical  components which make up a precipitator  are the shell,
electrodes,  hoppers, rappers, support members, and the necessary
electrical feedthrough and support backings.

      The shell can be rectangular or cylindrical and can be constructed
of steel, tile or concrete.  Thermal insulation is usually provided in the
case  of corrosive gases to maintain the shell above the dew point tempera-
ture to minimize corrosion.  Design of the shell generally follows straight-
forward structural engineering practice.

      The shell and electrode configurations can be arranged to divide the
gas flow and to provide independent sections that can be  separately energized.
When parallel gas flow paths are provided,  each path is  referred to as a
duct or chamber.

      Discharge electrodes in both cylindrical and plate  type precipitators
are of a variety of types depending upon the application and  the precipitator
manufacturer.   The discharge electrodes can be small diameter (~0.1 inch)
wire, square wire,  or fabricated structures of various types.  .The pri-
mary consideration in discharge electrode  selection is to obtain  desirable
voltage-current characteristics and to provide  mechanical strength for
resistance to corrosion and fatigue.  In general,, American  practice is to

-------
                                    -17-
utilize electrode structures supported at the top, with weights at the
hopper end to maintain the electrode taut.  Guides  are provided to
maintain alignment.  European practice is generally to use a mast or
frame for  rigid support of the discharge electrodes.  Various discharge
electrode configurations can be used with either type of mounting.

      Collecting electrodes  in plate type precipitators are generally flat
plates with various types of stiffeners and baffles.   The baffles provide
shielding of the collected dust to reduce reentrainment during rapping
and to reduce scouring of the plates due to gas flow.

      Single  impact or vibrational rappers are provided for dust removal
in dry type precipitators.  Rappers can be electromagnetically,  pneu-
matically,  or mechanically actuated.   The major requirement for
successful rapping is to deliver sufficient impact to the  electrodes to
dislodge the  dust without causing excessive reentrainment.  The
acceleration required to remove the dust varies with the type of dust and
gas composition.  Rapping is generally specified in terms of the energy
delivered per rap and the number of rappers per square foot for the col-
lecting surface or  per length of wire for the discharge electrode.

      Dust removal can be through flat bottom pans with scrapers to move
the collected material to a screen conveyor or through pyramidal hoppers
where it is removed by conveyors or  vacuum  systems.   The latter type is
the most prevalent.
GAS FLOW

      Gas flow in practical precipitators is well within the turbulent region.
When exiting from the process,  gas velocity usually is relatively high and
often uneven.  Gas velocity must be reduced to a relatively low level and
turbulence controlled before entering the precipitator for good precipitation.
Poor quality gas flow can affect precipitator performance by scouring the
plates in localized regions of high gas velocity and by reducing performance
due to the exponential relationship between efficiency  and gas volume flow.

      Often,  space limitations preclude more conventional methods of
achieving uniform gas flow,  and turning vanes, splitters, straighteners,
and diffusion plates must be designed to provide adequate gas flow quality.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -18-
The Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute recommends a minimum gas flow
quality such that 85% of local velocities are within 25% of the mean, with
no reading more than +40% from the mean.

      Because of the difficulties in predicting gas flow quality the use of
physical models is almost universal.  Models are  usually constructed
of pressed hardwood or acrylic plastic.  Smoke streamer patterns  and
pitot tube transverses are used to indicate gas flow uniformity.   Models
have been historically constructed £• to f size with the Reynolds number
held constant.  However, with the trend toward larger plants, models  con-
structed to •& scale have been used.  The use of smaller scale models
tends to  give less accurate results.
RESISTIVITY

      Electrical resistivity of the dust is an important factor in the per-
formance of electrostatic precipitators.  If the resistivity of the collected
dust is higher than about 2 x 10  ohm-cm,  excessive sparking or reverse
corona can occur,  thereby limiting precipitator performance.

      Two distinct types of electrical  conduction occur.  One type is con-
duction by free electrons within the particles.   This  type of conduction
depends upon the electron activation energy  (a material property) and
temperature.  Many industrial dusts are composed of metallic oxides,
sulfates,  etc. , which have low activation energies so that the  electrical
conductivity is low at temperatures in the range of 300-400°F.  At higher
temperatures,  however, conductivity  becomes greater and for most dusts
this is the primary conduction mechanism at temperatures above
450-500° F.

      The second kind of conduction is conduction over the particle  surfaces
owing to adsorption of moisture or certain chemicals such as  sulfuric acid.
Adsorption increases with decreasing  temperature and hence particle con-
ductivity also increases with decreasing temperature.  Moisture is often
referred to as the primary  conditioning agent and other chemical adsorbates
as secondary conditioning agents.

      The role  of the secondary conditioning agents is not clearly under-
stood in all cases.  It is postulated that the secondary conditioning agent

-------
                                    -19-
may alter the surface of the dust,  thus enhancing the rate of moisture
adsorption and hence the conductivity.  The effectiveness of the secondary
conditioning agent varies with the  type of dust.  There is evidence that an
acid conditioning agent, such as SO3, is  more effective in conditioning a
basic dust,  whereas a basic conditioning agent,  such as NH3, is more
effective in conditioning an acidic  dust.  There is some evidence that the
conditioning agent and moisture adsorb or condense onto the dust surface
together to  form the conductive layer and subsequently may react with the
dust layer to alter the resistivity.  Effects of additions of limestone to
particulate  emission from sources such  as power generator boilers and
sinter machines tend to indicate that reactions between dust and conditioning
agent may detrimentally influence electrical conductivity.

      In some instances of high resistivity dust,  additions of a  conditioning
agent to the effluent gas have resulted in substantial reductions in resis-
tivity and enhanced collection.  Examples  are SO3 additions to the gas from
power generator boilers and ammonia additions to gas from catalytic
cracking units used in petroleum refining.  However,  additions of relatively
large quantities of chemical additives have failed to improve performance
in some applications.   But since secondary conditioning agents are known
to be highly specific and selective in effectiveness, there is no appropriate
reason for  expecting random additives to work.   Causes for this condition
are not fully understood.
MEASUREMENT OF PERFORMANCE

      Measurement of precipitator performance generally includes dust
loadings at the precipitator inlet and outlet,  gas velocity distribution,
electrical current and voltage input to the precipitator,  and gas compo-
sition.  Dust resistivity is an important parameter that should be measured,
but often  is not.

      Dust loadings are normally measured by a sampling probe and a
dust collector, such as a thimble.  Prior to sampling,  a gas velocity dis-
tribution  traverse is made so that dust samples can be taken isokinetically
to minimize selective size collection.   Sources of error in sampling are
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -20-
usually attributed to anisokinetic sampling, improper probe handling, dust
collection on the walls of the sampling train or dust collector, and errors
in gas flow measurement.  Sampling procedures require careful attention
to detail and the development of skills in the sampling procedures.

      Resistivity of the dust sample must be made in-situ to be meaning-
ful.   Laboratory measurements may be high by orders of magnitude and
often fail to correlate with in-situ values.

      In-situ resistivity can be measured by determining the current flow
through a given volume of collected dust when a known voltage is impressed
across it.  Several types of resistivity probes can be used for this pur-
pose.  In some types,  the dust is deposited electrostatically utilizing a
point-plane precipitator.  Other type  probes utilize a cyclone type mechan-
ical collector.  The errors involved include those associated with obtain-
ing a representative sample.  Particle size and degree of packing can
influence the apparent resistivity of the dust layer.
TROUBLESHOOTING AND MAINTENANCE

      Causes for a precipitator to fail to achieve its design efficiency can
be due to inadequate  design, electrical difficulties, improper gas flow,
inadequate rapping, installation problems, electrode misalignment, poor
maintenance, or improper operation.

      Indications of electrical difficulties can usually be observed from
the levels of corona power input.   Efficiency is generally related to power
input,  and if inadequate power densities are indicated, difficulties  can
usually be traced to dust resistivity,  unusually fine particle size, elec-
trode misalignment,  improper control operation, or dust accumulation
on the electrodes.  Improper gas flow can be determined by measure-
ment of the  gas flow  distribution.  Poor gas flow can result from improper
design, plugging of distribution plates, build-up of dust on dust walls  and
turning vanes, etc.

      Improper rapping is usually manifest in excessive dust deposits on
the collection and discharge electrodes.  Adequacy of rapping can be
measured by accelerometers mounted on the electrodes.  Accelerations

-------
                                    -21-
required to dislodge the dust vary with type of dust and operating conditions,
and rapping must be adjusted to maintain the desired thickness of dust
deposit without excessive reentrainment.  Visual observation of interior of
outlet flue from the precipitator is often a sensitive and revealing method
for checking rapper operation.

      Maintenance  schedules should be set up for inspection,  servicing,
and repair of critical  components.  These components include rappers,
feed through bushings, transformers,  electrodes, ash removal equipment,
and electrical controls.  Excessive dust deposits, corrosion,  broken
wires,  etc. are common types of difficulties encountered.
ELECTROSTATIC AUGMENTATION AND UNUSUAL DESIGNS

      Electrostatic augmentation of fabric filters, packed bed filters, and
wet scrubbers has been studied in some detail.  Performance of fabric
filters varies with the type of dust deposit and the thickness of the deposit.
Pressure drop is also generally related to the dust deposit.  The filter-
ing action is generally considered to occur by the trapping of dust on the
collected layer.  If a single particle is  too large to pass through an inter-
stitial region,  it is trapped on the dust  layer and separated from  the gas
stream.

      Electrostatic augmentation involves establishing an  electric field
between the fabric and another electrode, precharging the dust particle,
or both. The effect of electrostatic augmentation is that the interstitial
openings in the fabric material function as if they were smaller and
hence smaller particles are retained.   Its principal advantage has been
in the more rapid build-up of the dust layer and somewhat higher effici-
ency for a given  pressure drop.

      Loose bed  filters are notably inefficient in collection of small
particles.  However, if charged particles are introduced or if an elec-
trostatic field is  impressed across the  filter or both,  the  dust particles
will deposit on the filter bed.  The effect is to provide increased  collec-
tion surface area in a two stage  precipitator.  Greatly increased  effi-
ciency can be achieved over that for a conventional loose bed filter.  The
potential for increased collection surface would indicate the possibility
of enhanced collection over a two stage  precipitator with the same metallic
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -22-
plate area.  The obvious disadvantage is in removal of the collected dust,
which would require liquid backwash or circulation and cleaning of the
filter material.

      Augmentation of wet scrubbers is intended to provide better contact
between the participate and the scrubbing liquid by utilization of the attrac-
tive force between the charged particles.  The  attractive force between a
charged dust particle and an oppositely charged liquid droplet varies with
the distance of separation.  Thus,  with separation distances  of lOjn, the
attractive force is approximately equal to the gravitational force.

      The use of the space charge developed as a result of the dust charge
or as a result of other charged material has often been the basis of a pre-
cipitator concept in which no high voltage is applied to the collection plate.

      Fields developed as a result of space charge can be quite high pro-
vided the concentration of charged dust is high  and there is ample spacing
between electrodes.  However,  as  dust is collected, the space charge
decreases and  collection efficiency decreases.  Charged water drops have
also been utilized to maintain a higher space charge field.  These approaches
are more suited to specialized applications and their practicality for indus-
trial gas cleaning has not been demonstrated.

-------
                                    -23-
                                CHAPTER 1
                          CORONA GENERATION
      Since electrical conduction in gases has been a subject of extensive
research for many years, the mechanism of conduction is well understood
from both the theoretical and experimental standpoints.  The research
includes studies covering a wide range of pressure, temperature, and
electrical field strength for a variety of areas such as plasma physics,
electrical high voltage transmission,  and electric lighting.

      Among the more comprehensive theoretical discussions of gas dis-
charge phenomena are those by von Engel,* Wannier,2 and Loeb.  •*
White presents a discussion of gas discharge phenomena as applied
specifically to electrostatic precipitation.  The body of information avail-
able about the electrical behavior of gases appears to be sufficient to
describe the principles of corona generation as it applies to the electrostatic
precipitation process.

      The two types of corona used in electrostatic precipitation are classi-
fied as negative and positive, depending on the electrical polarity of the
corona wire. Negative corona are characterized by greater stability than
positive corona,  and by higher currents and field strengths at near standard
temperature and pressure conditions, which,  in turn,  lead to increased
collection efficiency.  As a result,  negative corona are used in almost all
industrial electrostatic precipitators.  This analysis is therefore primarily
devoted to the negative corona precipitator.   The principal drawback to the
use of negative corona is the  generation of a significant amount of ozone.
Although this has  not been considered to  be a problem  with industrial gas
cleaning,  it does tend to preclude its use in air conditioning systems.

      To understand the phenomenon of the corona discharge, it is
necessary to consider the behavior of gases under the  influence of an elec-
tric field.  Although gases are basically  nonconductors, there are some
free electrons and ions present in the gas due to  ionizing radiation which
exists in the atmosphere.  Cosmic rays and naturally occurring radio-
activity produce about 20 ion-electron pairs per cm3-second.   If an
electric field is applied to these gases, a small,  almost immeasurable,
current flows.   This current  is caused by the  flow of the free electrons
*Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -24-
and ions under the influence of the electric field.  Expressed as an
equation from electrostatic theory (Coulomb's law):

      F  =  qE                                                 (1.1)

where
      F  =  force,
      q  =  charge on the particle,  and
      E  =  electric field strength.

This force drives the charged particles through the gas,  resulting in an
electric current flow.  The motion of the charged particles is governed
primarily by the combined effects of the electric field as the driving force,
with inertia and viscous forces (collisions between the particles and gas
molecules) as the retarding forces.  When the particles attain a constant
or terminal velocity,  the inertia force is reduced to zero, and the two
remaining forces result in an average velocity for the particles which is
related to the magnitude of the electric field and the gas viscosity.   The
velocity attained will be that at which the viscous drag force balances the
applied electrical force.   The constant of proportionality is termed the
particle mobility ju, -

      v  =

This mobility parameter contains such factors as the charge-to-cross-
sectional-area ratio of the particle and the viscosity or density of the
host gas.7

      Orbital electrons in an atom are held to the nucleus by a combina-
tion of nuclear, atomic, and electrostatic forces.  The resultant  binding
force is different for each gas species.  The magnitude of this binding
force is referred to as the binding energy of each species.  An electron
can be removed from the parent atom by the addition of sufficient energy
to exceed the binding energy of that particular gas atom.   Thus, collisions
between rapidly moving free electrons and orbital electrons can transfer
a sufficient quantity of energy to the bound electrons to free them.  This
leads to the formation of a positive ion and an additional free electron,
through a process termed ionization.

      lonization occurs in gases where the electric field is increased to
the point that free electrons can be accelerated to a velocity sufficient to

-------
                                    -25-
ionize an atom.  This energy must be supplied in a short interval of
time because the free electrons can  lose energy through collision.  Thus,
the electric field must be great enough to supply the ionization energy
during the  time between inelastic collisions.

      The  corona is generated by a mechanism which is commonly referred
to as  electron avalanche.  This mechanism becomes effective when the
applied electric field exceeds that required to impart a sufficient velocity
to the free electrons to cause ionization by collision with the bound electrons
in the gas  molecules.8 These newly freed electrons are also accelerated
and cause  additional ionization.  Starting  with a single free electron,  one
ionizing collision will free an additional electron, both of which again are
accelerated and collide with other gas molecules to  release two additional
electrons.   This multiplication process continues throughout the region of
space where the electric field exceeds the critical value for ionization.

      There is always  a supply of free electrons available to initiate the
avalanche  process.   These free electrons are supplied by the ionization of
gas molecules by either cosmic rays, natural radioactivity, photoionization,
or the thermal energy of the gas.  If the avalanche mechanism is initiated
in a uniform electric field, such as a parallel plate  capacitor, the avalanche
will continue until a path between the plates becomes ionized and a spark
occurs,  resulting in an unstable breakdown. If the breakdown occurs in a
region with a nonuniform electric  field, however, corona will occur only
in those regions where the critical field is exceeded.  This leads to the
conventional corona glow discharge in the region where ionizing collisions
are occurring,  followed by a quiescent zone where the electric field is
insufficient to maintain the avalanche process.  These nonuniform fields
can be established by the application of a  voltage between either a point
or wire as one electrode and a  plate or concentric cylinder as the other.

      Consider,  for example, the  electric field existing between a wire  and
a concentric cylinder.  From Gauss' law,  the field for a condition of no
current flow can be  described as
      E  =
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -26-
where

      V  =  applied voltage,
      a  =  radius of the inner wire,
      b  =  radius of the concentric cylinder, and
      r  =  radius to the point where the value of the field is desired.

      As the voltage between the wire and cylinder is increased, the field
strength will increase until the electric field at the corona wire reaches
that required for corona initiation.  This field at which the onset of corona
begins is given by a semi- empirical relation by Peek.9
     Ec  =  30 md (1 +0.3Q    ) kV/cm                              (1.3)
                          •* a
where
     Ec  =  corona onset field strength,
      m  =  a roughness factor for the wire, 0, 5 <_ m <^1. 0, and
      d  =  relative air  density.
                 P0
where
     T0  =  standard absolute temperature of room air (293° K),  and
     P0  *  standard atmospheric pressure (760 mm mercury).
           T and P are the actual absolute temperature and pressure for
which "d" is to be calculated.

      Equation 1. 3 shows that the electric field required for the onset of
corona increases as the diameter of the wire decreases.  Small diameter
wires result in higher field strength near the surface.  However, the
magnitude  of the field rapidly decreases at increasing distances from the
wire.  On the other hand, larger diameter wires result in low field strength
near the wire surface and the value of the electric field falls off less rapidly
away from the wire.  It is apparent, therefore, that both the maximum
value of  the field and the gradient are significant in determining the corona
onset field.  At very large values of "a", the second term of Equation 1. 3
becomes insignificant.  Thus,  for a very large wire diameter,  the magnitude
of the corona onset field would approach 30 kV/cm for a smooth wire.

-------
                                   -27-
Since this is the breakdown strength for air in a uniform field, sparking
would occur,  and  corona generation would not be possible.

      The applied voltage required to generate an electric field of the
critical value can be determined by integrating the electric field  from
the surface of the corona wire to the outer electrode.


      V  =   /  E(r)dr =  /  -^ dr = aEcln^
                                              a
                         a
         =  30amd(l + 0.3-ln ~                              ,1  A\
                  \        i a /   a                               (1.4)

      When the critical voltage for the onset of corona is reached,  free
electrons in the vicinity of the wire are accelerated to the ionization
energy,  and avalanche will occur in the region where the critical field
strength is exceeded.

      Continuing into the lower field region  of the precipitator, the electric
field strength decreases as indicated by Equation 1.2, until the electrons no
longer exceed the ionization energy.  At this point in  space,  the avalanche
process is quenched,  no more free  electrons are generated, and therefore
no more positive ions are present.  The edge  of this avalanche region is
defined by the boundary of the corona glow.  Therefore, only negative
charges are available to carry the current within the  quiescent portion of
the precipitator.

      Even though the total current is carried by negative charges in the
quiescent region of the precipitator,  positive ions  are active carriers in
the corona zone.  At the surface of the corona wires the current is carried
almost  exclusively by the  positive ions.  The free  electrons  are produced
by the avalanche process in the region surrounding the corona wire, with
the exception of secondary electrons.  Thus, from the principle of current
continuity,  the current is  carried by a combination of positive ions and
secondary electrons  in the region immediately surrounding  the corona
wire, but is carried  solely by negative charges in the quiescent zone.

      The behavior of the  negative charges in  the low field region is
governed by the characteristics of the host gas.  The presence of an
electronegative gas such  as oxygen,  chlorine,  and sulfur dioxide,  serves
the function of building up a space charge  by attaching and retaining the
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -28-
free electrons generated by the avalanche.  These electrons are held to the
gases because the gas atom is at a lower energy state when a negative ion is
formed.  The mobility of the negative ion is almost the same as for the
positive ion. The negative ions  drift slowly,  in comparison to free elec-
trons,  toward the collection electrode giving rise to a significant space
charge.

      The conditions necessary for the maintenance of a stable negative
corona include  a copious source of electrons near the discharge electrode
and an effective space charge in the passive zone between the electrodes.
The space charge is necessary to stabilize  the avalanche region in the
corona by bringing about an equilibrium condition between the  electric field
and the electron multiplication region.  In the absence of a sufficient limiting
space charge, the avalanche process would grow until sparking occurred.

      In the negative corona discharge, the electron avalanche mechanism
produces large numbers of free electrons near the discharge electrode;
however,  due to their relatively high mobility, ~400 times that of ions,
the free electrons are quickly swept to the anode and do not form a space
charge unless electronegative gases are present.   In the presence of
electronegative gases,  an effective space charge is built up by the attach-
ment of free electrons to the gases.

      The positive ions created in the avalanche process move to and
impact with the corona electrode.  These impacts provide an additional
source of electrons by the process of secondary emission.

      Secondary emission is a statistical process whereby a small per-
centage of the ion impacts results in a new  free electron.   Approximately
one out of every thousand positive ions produces a free electron at
standard gas conditions.  The rate of generation is related to the electric
field in the vicinity of the corona electrode  and to the electrode material.
This does not limit the  corona generation process, however,  because the
avalanche mechanism provides many positive ions for each original elec-
tron through electron multiplication.

      Figure 1.1 is a graphical representation of the corona discharge
showing the feedback nature of the process.

      There are two stages in the development of a corona.  If the corona
is brought about by slowly increasing the applied voltage,  the location of
the first corona point will  be determined primarily by the geometry of the

-------
                                   -29-
       Cathode
       Secondary
       Emissions
                       Positive
                       Ions
                                                   Negative Ions
               Particle
               Charging
Electric
Field
Figure 1.1  Diagram of the Feedback Nature of the Avalanche Process.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -30-
surface irregularities of the corona electrode.  Points and other surface
conditions lead to electric field enhancement, and when the field in one of
these localized regions exceeds the breakdown potential at that point, the
avalanche process is initiated.  The region in which breakdown potential
is exceeded is quite limited for voltages near breakdown.  As the avalanche
proceeds, the highly mobile free electrons are swept clear of the relatively
sluggish positive ions.  These ions build up a positive space charge of a
sufficient value to quench the avalanche process by the attraction of, and
recombination with, the secondary electrons, and by the repelling effect
of the negative space charge.  The avalanche process will remain inactive
until a sufficient  portion of the positive space charge drifts to the corona
wire for the process to repeat.  The net result of the above causes inter-
mittent pulses of corona from the localized avalanche.   This phenomenon,
known as "Trichel Pulsing, " is described  in detail by Loeb.

      Increasing  the applied voltage causes an increase in the space charge
required to quench the corona at the initial breakdown point and also causes
localized breakdown in additional  regions.   Further increases in applied
voltages lead to increasing regions of ionization.  The  current flow is  still
intermittent as localized areas break down, build up a  space charge, and
are quenched.     •

      The second stage in the development of the corona occurs when
the applied voltage exceeds a certain value, and the character of the
corona changes into a more stable configuration.  This situation is
commonly referred to as a glow discharge.  The glow discharge is
characterized by relatively steady regions where the positive space charge
near the ions, the negative space  charge in the interelectrode space, and
the avalanche electrons are in electrical equilibrium with  the applied
voltage.

1.1  CURRENT VOLTAGE RELATIONSHIP

      The current and voltage relationships in a concentric wire and
cylinder electrode system are such that a relatively simple mathematical
relationship can  be derived from Poisson's equation, which governs all
electrostatic phenomena.   Poisson's equation, in the rationalized MKS
system of units,  is:

      A2V  =   --                                                  (1.5)

-------
                                  -31-
which for cylindrical coordinates reduces to

      -5LV.+  JL   *L +  P_  ,  0
      dr      r    dr     €
The space charge density, p,  for the cylindrical corona is given by
      P  =
                i
             27TrE
                                                                  (1.6)
Since
      dV
~E, substitution of 1. 6 and 1.7 into 1. 5 yields
                                                                  (1.7)
      rE
          dr
E2  - ^r-i
                       27re0jLt
                                =  0
                                                      (1.8)
which integrates to
         = _dV  =   - /  * ...
             dr     */ 27re0/i
                                                                  (1.9)
C is a constant of integration, and need only be constant with respect to
r.  In general, C will be dependent upon the physical dimensions of the
corona wire and  collection electrode, as well as the applied  voltage.  This
constant of integration can be evaluated from the boundary condition that
the electric field is very close to the breakdown potential at  the boundary
of the visible  glow  region (r = r0) from which
      C  = r
                      27T€0/1
Utilizing this value for C yields the following relationship between current.
and voltage for the cylindrical precipitator
      V  = r0Ed
                  In 5  -  1 +/ 1  4-
                                                                   (1.10)
                                              SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -32-
where

      a  =  radius of the corona wire,  m
      b  =  radius of the collection electrode, m
      i  =  current per unit length of the corona wire, amp/m,
      Ji  =  effective mobility of the charge carrier, m2/v-sec,
     Ec  =  breakdown field strength, kV/m,
      r0 =  outer radius of the glow region,  m,
      V  =  applied voltage, kV, and
      e0  =  permittivity of free space.

      The initial field strength required for breakdown for smooth, round
wire and for air of relative density, d, as determined from  Equation 1.3
is
     Ec =  (30d +9v£7a") kV/cm,                                 (Ml)

setting the current equal to zero and assuming that the radius of the corona
glow region is equal to the radius of the discharge electrode wire in
Equation 1. 10, leads to a starting voltage of

      V0 =  (30 ad + 9A/ad~)ln -                                    (1. 12)
                            EL

      From Equation 1. 12, it is clear that reducing the size of the corona
wire will result in a decrease  in the applied voltage necessary to initiate
corona.  As shown in Figure 1.2, for a given applied voltage, Equation
1. 10 can be satisfied only if the current per unit length increases with a
decrease in Ec, which leads to an increase in the corona current.  Con-
versely, the current can be decreased by increasing the  corona wire size.

      The situation described above is specifically calculated for the
cylindrical electrode configuration, but the parallel plate and wire
electrode are similar.   The equations are not as simple  because the
symmetry  of the cylindrical precipitator simplifies the mathematics.
However, the effects of wire size and electrode spacing will be governed
by the relationship of voltage vs.  current in the same manner.

      The plate-type precipitator also has an additional degree of
freedom — the corona wire spacing. Qualitatively, it  is apparent that if
the corona wires are spaced very close together, the system would
approach the field configuration in a parallel plate capacitor,  which yields

-------
                                  -33-
   60
   50
£  40
o
bo
ttf
d
C
O
b
O
U
  30  --
  20  --
  10  --
                 0.1
0.2        0.3
  Wire Diameter, in.
0.4
0.5
       Figure 1. 2 Theoretical Relationship Between Corona Starting

                  Voltage and Wire Size (from Equation 1.11).
                                                SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -34-
a constant field strength in the interelectrode space.  For a given applied
voltage, this reduces the electric field near the corona wire.  Therefore,
if it is desirable to increase the current density in a region,  it may be
accomplished by either using smaller wires or spacing the wires farther
apart; see Figure 1.3.  Similarly, the current density can be reduced by
spacing the corona wires closer together, using larger wires, or both.

1. 2  TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE EFFECTS

      For the most part, the discussion of precipitator fundamentals is
concerned with operations at atmospheric pressure and temperatures
between 100°F and 600°F.  There is, however,  current interest  in the limi-
tations placed  on precipitator operation by high temperature and high
pressure.

      One effect of gas temperature on corona generation is a change in
the relative number of ionized molecules.  The gas in a precipitator is nor-
mally an insulating medium; however, as discussed earlier,  it becomes
conductive through ionization.   In the electron avalanche process, .the
ionization energy is supplied by the applied electric field.  However, any
source of energy, such as thermal energy, can be utilized for ionization.
The average energy of a molecule is related to the absolute temperature
by the Boltzmann constant. But the energy of each individual molecule is
statistically distributed on both sides of the average energy.  Those
molecules with energies greater than the ionization potential of the gas
will be  ionized, and therefore will provide charge carriers for conduction.

      This mechanism has been reported by Saha. 10 The Saha equation,
relating the number of thermally ionized molecules to the ionization
potential of the gas, is described by Cobine.    This equation is  given as:
                                       2.5log10T- 6.5           (1.13)
which relates the fraction of the molecules ionized to the temperature,
pressure, and ionization potential of the molecule.

      The fraction ionized,  X, can be calculated from the above equation
where P is in atmospheres  absolute, V^ is the ionization potential in volts,
and T is absolute temperature,  "Kelvin.  For a temperature of 1500°F
(1090°K) and at atmospheric pressure, the fraction of thermal ions for

-------
                                   -35-
   3-

-------
                                 -36-
                                                            *. I
oxygen, with an ionization potential of 13. 6 volts, is about 10"  ,  which is
less than the number of ions formed by naturally occurring radioactivity
and cosmic rays.  An increase in pressure reduces the ionized fraction
still further.  Therefore, thermal ionization can be completely neglected
in precipitator operations up to 1500°F.

      Temperature and pressure do modify corona starting and sparkover
potentials.  The avalanche process is brought about because the electron
has sufficient time between inelastic  collisions to be accelerated to a velocity
sufficient to ionize the gas.  Therefore, the potential necessary to start
corona is related to the density of the host gas.  If pressure, and hence
density,  is increased, the molecules are effectively moved closer together,
resulting  in a shortened mean free path and  reduced mean free time.  This
reduced mean free time requires  a greater electric field to accelerate the
electron to the ionization velocity.

      Both temperature and pressure modify the gas density.  The gas
density,  d0, at a given temperature,  T0, and pressure,  P0, is related to
the density at other temperatures and pressures by:

              T«   .   P .
       d =  d
              T      PO

thus, an increase in pressure at a given temperature results in an
increased density,,while an increase in temperature at constant pressure
results in a decreased density.   The effect of gas pressure and density on
corona starting  potential has been experimentally determined by Shale12,
and is shown in  Figure  1'. 4.

      The electrical limits for operation of a precipitator are defined by
the corona onset on the one hand, and sparking potential on the  other.
Shale points out that in  negative corona, both corona starting voltage and
sparkover voltage are influenced by gas temperature and pressure.
Figure 1. 5 shows the relationship between corona current and voltage
for air at 1500°F at various pressures.  It is apparent that for pressures
between 0 and 20 psig,  there is little change in voltage as current,is
increased.  In such case, sparkover would occur at a voltage near the
corona starting  voltage, severely limiting the  range of operation.  The
low operating voltage imposed by these conditions result in low values
of electric field, which in turn limit precipitator performance.  At higher

-------
                      -37-
0  5
          20       35       50      65
               Pressure, psi (gage)
                                               T • 1500°F
f
80
Figure 1.4 Variations in Clean Electrode Corona Starting
            Potential With Pressure and Temperature
            Negative Corona (Reference 12).
                                       SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
         [     '   I—I  I  I I I
                           1.0
10
                                Current, mA
                                                                                     CO
                                                                                     oo
                                                                                      i
100
Figure 1. 5  Electrical Characteristics of Air at 1500° F Negative Corona

            (Reference 12).

-------
                                  -39-


pressures,  the effective range of operating voltages is increased so that
reasonable  electric fields can be maintained.

      In negative corona,  Shale has shown that effective ion mobilities
increase due to the following factors:

      (1) at constant gas temperature and field strength, ion mobility
          increases with decreasing gas density,

      (2) at constant density and field strength, ion mobility  increases
          with increasing temperature,  and

      (3) at constant temperature and gas density, ion mobility
          increases with increasing field strength.

The effect of factor 1  is that at lower gas densities, electrons travel
further before they are attached to gas molecules  to form ions.   Thus,  the
average velocity of the current carriers is increased.  The other factors
(2 and 3) are reportedly due to the increase in the number of free electrons
in the vicinity of the corona wire due to increased thermionic emission and
to increased secondary emission from positive ion impaction on  the corona
wire.  The  availability of these additional electrons  and the presence of
a high field  again result in their traveling further toward the collection
plate before being  captured by inelastic collision with an electronegative
gas molecule.  Since the current in the  interelectrode space is the product
of the charge,  effective  mobility, and field strength,  the apparent increase
in mobility  results in  increased  current.  Consequently, for negative
corona,  the voltage-current curves would be altered toward higher currents
at lower voltage.

      In negative corona,  the presence of negative ions near the  corona
wire provides a space charge which limits the  field near the  wire  and
serves to stabilize the discharge.  However,  with low gas densities, the
highly mobile,  free electrons  move rapidly away from the corona wire
and are not effective in providing a stabilizing space charge until they
are captured by an electronegative gas molecule.   Since the electrons
move a longer distance before capture at low  gas densities, the space
charge effect is reduced and the current rises more rapidly than at
higher gas densities.  Thus, sparkover occurs at  reduced voltage.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -40-
      In positive corona,  the same effects would not occur since the current
carriers are positive ions. Electrons from the avalanche process are
attracted to the corona wire and do not travel to the collection electrode.
Consequently,  positive corona should have more favorable voltage-current
relationships in the high temperature region with higher sparkover potentials.

      The more favorable voltage-current characteristics of the positive
corona discharge have  been confirmed experimentally on a 15 foot long wire
and pipe precipitator,  as indicated in Figure 1. 6.

1.3  PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CORONA
     THEORY  ON ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION

      The behavior of an  electrostatic precipitator  is strongly dependent
upon the value  of the electric  field in the vicinity of the collection  elec-
trode and the value of the charge imparted to the particulate matter.   The
charge, in turn,  is related to the electric field in the charging region;
therefore,  the  voltage-current relationship for the precipitator  is  important.
Gas temperature and composition modify the V-I characteristics for a given
precipitator.  As previously mentioned, the presence of an effective space
charge is necessary in order  to maintain a stable corona.  This space
charge for negative corona is dependent upon the presence of a sufficient
quantity of electronegative gases such as oxygen or sulfur dioxide. Figures
1. 7 and 1. 8 show the V-I characteristics for nitrogen with various per-
centages of oxygen and sulfur dioxide, respectively, for a concentric
cylinder type precipitator.  It is clear from the graphs that increasing the
percentage of electronegative gas increases the space charge, which exerts
a current limiting  effect on the  system.                           '

      Since water vapor is a constituent of combustion products, the
effect  on the V-I characteristics of the corona is important.  As shown in
Figure 1. 9, increasing the amount of water vapor in air results in an
increase in sparkover voltage and a decrease in the corona current.  The
effect  is more  pronounced as  quantities of water up to about 40 percent
by volume are  added.
                    !
      Since the effect of the space charge is to limit the current, the
addition of particulate matter, which represents a much more immobile
charge (mobility of electrons  » mobility of ions » mobility of charged
particulate) reduces the current still further.  The  effect of this can be

-------
                          -41-
15
c
9)
L,



5

0)
bo
a)
"
                                 Negative Corona

                                 137 psia, 1678°F
                                          Positive Corona

                                          137 psia, 1720°F
             255075


                  Average Voltage,  kV
                                                 TOO
   Figure 1.6  Current Voltage Relationships for 15-ft

               Wire and Pipe Precipitator at High

               Pressure and High Temperature

               (Reference 14).
                                         SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -42-
                     100% N
                                                 Air
          20
40         60         80
    Applied Voltage,  kV
100
Figure 1.7 Negative Corona Characteristics for Nitrogen-Oxygen Mixtures
           With Clean Electrodes (Reference 5).

-------
                                    -43-
  10-.
   8--
g
u
cd
g
   6
   2
                          Spark at 37 kV,  16 mA
               20
40          60         80
  Applied Voltage, kV
                                  5% SO.
100
   Figure 1. 8  Variation of Negative Corona Current With Applied Voltage
               for Nitrogen-Sulfur Dioxide Mixtures (Reference 5 -
               Clean Electrodes).
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -44-

-------
                                    -45-


seen by considering the relative amount of charge that appears as free
electrons,  negative ions, and negative charge on the particulate.   In the
following discussion, a concentric cylindrical precipitator with no particulate
loading will be considered.   Later (Chapter 2) the effect of particulate
loading will be included.

      The relative amount of charge carried by free electrons and negative
ions can be determined from the relationship that the current at the corona
wire must  be equal to the current at the outer cylinder and,  similarly, the
charge transferred at both electrodes must be equal.  The current per unit
length of the corona wire must be equal to the current per unit length of
the collection electrode under steady-state conditions.  The current  at the
corona wire consists of the positive ion current to the wire,  plus  the free
secondary electron current from the wire.  This can be expressed as
      i =  nee +  n+e                                            (1.15)

where

ne, n+  =  the number of electrons and ions per unit time
              crossing the wire surface,
    e   =  the electronic charge,  and
    i   =  the current per unit length of the corona wire.

      The  number of electrons per unit time is related to the number of
ions by the secondary emission coefficient  y  of the corona material such
that

    ne =  yn+,                                                   (1.16)

so that the current per unit length becomes

      i =  n+e (1 +y)  «  n+e                                     (1.17)

because y  is a small number compared to 1.

      The  source of the positive ions which drift toward the corona wire
is the  ionization caused by the electron avalanche, since for every free
electron there remains a positive ion.  If we describe the  ionization
process as a mechanism by which every free electron generates a number
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -46-
of new electrons through ionization in unit distance,  the rate of change
of the number of electrons per unit distance can be expressed as
      dne  =  ne<*dr                                               (1.18)

where a is the ionization coefficient.  The ionization coefficient is assumed
to be independent of the electric field strength over the region of field and
space normally encountered in precipitators.  Strictly speaking,  or is field
dependent.  Equation 1. 18 can be integrated from the  surface of the wire to
the edge of the avalanche region to yield the relative increase in free
electrons.
      noe
           =  exp (or)                                             (1.19)
where n   is the number of electrons per second from the corona wire and
natural processes.  These electrons can be generated by irradiation,
secondary emission or bombardment by metastables,  but in the following
discussion, all three effects are lumped in the secondary emission
coefficient, y .

      For each positive, ion, there must be a number of free electrons
generated, equal to the secondary emission coefficient y.-  Therefore, in
the avalanche process, one free electron must generate (— ) electrons and
positive ions, in order for the process to be continuous.   The avalanche
process generates an equal number  of positive ions as electrons, so that

      np   =  ne~ noe

For this quantity of positive ions, noe free electrons must be generated
by secondary emission

      noe   =

Substituted into  (1. 19),

      ne   =  y (ne - nQe) exp a- r,                                   (1.21a)

from which

-------
                                   -47-

                                                       "
                                                  oe
exp (ar)  = - ^ _  --- 1
            r(n-ne)
                      eoe


and

      V * ^ne                                                  (1-22)

          ,    x  _.  1  ,,   yne  x    ,   1      1 + y
      exp (ar)  -  y (1 + ^-)  =  1 + - -  —^                (L 22a)
or,
                 1 + V
      ar   = In 	—*-                                          (1.23)
from which

                  •1~^~ .                                        (1.24)

Equation 1. 24 relates the radius of the glow region to the secondary emission
coefficient (y ) and the avalanche coefficient (or).

      At the  collection electrode, there are three current-carriers - free
electrons, negative ions, and negatively charged particulates.   The total
current per unit length at the collection electrode can be expressed as

       i   =  ne'e  +  n-e + npqpe                                  (1.25)

where n ',  n_, and np are the number per unit time of electrons, negative
ions, and particles,  respectively,  arriving at the collection electrode,  and
q   is the  number  of electrons bound to the particulate  matter.   Equations
if 15 and 1. 18 yield

 n+e (1+y) = e (nj + n- +

Before any particulate is introduced, n^ will be zero.  This is the case
under current consideration;  later,  in the chapter on systems  analysis,
this term is  included in  the analysis of the precipitation mechanism.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -48-

      Since they are equal,  the current flow in the space just outside the
corona wire can be equated to the current just inside the collection electrode.
Current carried by free carriers under the influence of an electric field
is well understood.   In the region near the corona wire, the electric field
can be designated ECQ, and at the collection electrode, Ep.  The current
density at the corona wire can be expressed as

      Jcor  =  NeejteEco + N+eM+ + Eco  =  eEco (NeMe + N+M+).   (1. 26)
Where (Ne) and (N ) are the number densities (number per unit volume) of
the charge carriers  in the region just outside the corona wire, and (j) is
the current density (amps/m2).  Similarly,  at the collection electrode

            =  Ne'e^eEp  +  N_eji_Ep  + NpqpeMpEp.              (1.27)

Where N ', N_, and  N  are the number densities of free electrons,
negative ions and particulates near the  collection electrode.  Np  is again
equal to zero in this example, but is  included for completeness.   Equating
the total current at the  corona wire to that at the collection electrode
yields :

Jcor27TR1 = Jcol27TR2,  from which                                (1.28)

R1eEco(Neue + N+JH+)  =  R2eEp(NeVe  + N_^_ + N^,  but         (1.28a)

since N  = 0,
  e  e     ~  ""       i    co

The relative values of the above mobilities are known, and related as
follows:

pi  S  M- ~ 10~3 pie, which yields, upon substitution

B^ Ep_  =  103NeM+  +  N+M+  _       N+              Ne         f     ,
                                     I' + N_     NJ  + K --«   U'dW
Next, relate N, and N at the corona
                                                                 (1.31)

-------
                                   -49-
      ne =   7rRlN^eEco                                         (1.32)

      ne =  m+                                                  (1.33)
                        V+Eco                                 t1'34)


      Ne=  rN+—                                             (1.35)
or,
Substitute into Equation 1. 29
    "NT         TU  TJ*
    «_        Kx &CQ
                                                                 (1.35a)

                                        and                      (L37a)
   N.R2Ep


but N R E  (1 + y)  can never be less than unity because the numerator
      N_R2Ep

represents the current to the  corona wire, while the denominator represents
the negative ion current to the collection electrode.  This ratio must always
be greater than or equal to 1.   (See Equation 1. 22.)
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -50-




Therefore,


      y N. RjEjjQ     N '     (M )

                     N       M                                   (1.38)
which yields after manipulation
                          _  =   _Eb_ .   ""GO   . _,		

                                 R2     E        Me     103
                                         P
                  TJ   T^             11

Typical values for rr1,  -rr^-, y, and —^ are,  respectively, 10"3,  10,  10"3,
                  Jtto   F.             ju. _
                        P
      — 3
and 10  ,  which yield for an order of magnitude estimate



      N
      —=-  ~  10"3 and is therefore negligible.

      N+



At the other extreme, if N_« N '  —-, and
           *
                    ~  lu ,  then Equation 1. 37 becomes
                           ,
N+ (l+r)B1Eco  -  R2EpNe   -^                                 (1.39)




N_      (l+y)R1Eco                                            (i>4Q)
     =  10-5.                                                      (1.40a)
Again, Ne is negligible when compared with the number of positive ions

per unit volume at the corona wire, and we can conclude from this that

N_ »Ne\ or that most of the negative charge is attached to molecules to

form negative ions  outside of the glow region.   This is not to say that some

-------
                                    -51-
current could not be carried by the free electrons because of their increased
mobility.   If only one free electron were present for every 104 negative
ions, then about 10 percent of the current would be carried by electrons.
But the majority of charge is bound to molecules as negative  ions.

      The  spacial distribution of the various charged particles within the
cylindrical precipitator is illustrated in Figure 1.10.  The free electrons
and positive  ions result from avalanche;  the negative ions result from
electron attachment.

      The  space charge in the quiescent zone outside the glow region
serves to limit the current flow by electrostatic repulsion. The level of
current is a  function of the characteristics of the host gas. For example,
nitrogen does not readily form negative ions by electron attachment. There-
fore, the electrons are free to move (high mobility) and are rapidly carried
to the collection electrode.  However, oxygen readily attaches an electron
for decreased  mobility with the associated sluggish space  charge, which
tends to limit the current.

      This effect is  readily seen with the introduction of dust  particles
into the precipitator.  The large dust particles are charged by the negative
ions, and since they are much more sluggish (still smaller mobility than
ions), more  significant space  charge results, and the current flow imme-
diately drops.   This effect is explained theoretically by Gauss' law, which
states that the integral of the normal component of the electric field over
a closed surface is proportional to the enclosed charge.6  Therefore, it is
seen that the value of the original electric field near the corona wire in a
precipitator  is first modified (reduced) by the space charge caused by
gaseous conduction, and still further reduced by the introduction of the
charged particulate.

      The  physical laws governing negative  corona also pertain to the
positive corona. The naturally occurring free electrons are accelerated
by the high electric field in the region of the corona wire,  and in turn
experience ionizing  collision with the neutral molecules of the host gas.
However,  in this case,  the electrons are driven to the collection electrode.
The most probable source of primary electrons is photoionization by
light quanta from the glow region, as well as from natural radiation.
Since the positive ions  are captured  in a low field region (Ep) in the positive
corona situation, then fewer secondary electrons are produced, which  leads
to a reduced  current compared to that which would result in the negative
corona case.  Also, positive corona does not depend upon the presence of
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                          -52-
                    «*-Outer Edge of Corona
Electric Field
Free Electrons
Positive Ions
Negative Ions
                                                R,
i
I
/
y
>x
\
\
>»
F


                                                  Radius
Figure 1.10  Electric Field and Charged Particle Distribution
             Within a Corona,

-------
                                    -53-


electronegative gases, as did the negative corona.  The charge is carried
in the quiescent zone exclusively by positive ions.  Therefore, positive
corona is stable in mixtures which do not contain electronegative gases.

1.4  PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CORONA GENERATION

      The discussions to this point have been for the highly idealized case
of clean electrodes with atmospheric air.  The basic mechanisms and
principles described for this idealized case apply in general to the situations
encountered in commercial electrostatic precipitators, even though the
particular calculated values and specific boundary conditions may be altered
by the presence of both a dust loaded gas  and electrodes covered by a
collected deposit.

      In the practical precipitation process,  dust particles will be deposited
on the collection electrode and to varying degrees on the corona electrode.
These deposits can lead to significant modifications  in the behavior of the
precipitator over that predicted for clean electrodes.

      The modifications that occur due to dust deposits are  dependent upon
the thickness of the layer and the electrical properties  of the dust.

      Deposits on the corona wire are manifested as an apparent increase
in the radius of the wire.  An increase in corona wire radius causes a
decrease in the corona current and an increase in the value of the corona
initiation voltage.

      These factors may be  partially offset by the surface irregularities
caused by the deposition of individual dust particles.  Geometric variations
on the surface of a conductor cause electric field enhancement in the region
of the irregularity with a resultant localized increase in corona current.
Thus, a compensation to some degree may be associated with the deposit
buildup.

      High resistivity dusts  on the corona wire can either enhance  or retard
the formation of corona.   The current density is greater at  the corona wire
than at the collection electrode by the ratio of their areas.  Since the
electric field in the collected dust layer is equal to the  product of the
current density and resistivity, this large value of current density, together
with a rather high value of resistivity can lead to electric field values
greater than the breakdown field strength of the gas  in the interstitial regions
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -54-
pf the deposit on the corona wire.  Thus,  corona currents can flow with a
high resistivity deposit on the corona wire.  In situations where the corona
region does not extend past the deposit, a significant voltage drop can occur
in the deposit.  This voltage subtracts  directly from the power supply voltage,
and may cause a decrease in the performance of a precipitator.

      Deposits on the collection electrode seem to cause no electrical
difficulties except for high resistivity dusts.   The literature typically lists
high resistivity dusts as those deposits with resistivities exceeding about
2 x 10  ohm-cm. Two detrimental factors are associated with a high
resistivity deposit on the collection electrode.  The first is that a voltage
drop occurs across  the dust layer that  is proportional to the resistivity of
the dust, the current density, and the thickness of the deposit.  The power
supply must have sufficient dynamic voltage range to compensate for the
voltage drop or the behavior of the precipitator will be impaired.

      A second factor that is  covered: in some detail in Chapter 8,
Particle Collection, is back corona. Back corona is a condition where
the electrical breakdown strength of the gas in the interstitial regions of
the deposit is exceeded.   The electric field in the deposit is proportional
to the current density and the deposit resistivity.  If this value of electric
field exceeds  some critical value, a corona glow is formed on the dust
deposit that proves-detrimental to precipitator operation.

      The above factors  must be considered when applying the principles
of Chapter 2 to industrial electrostatic precipitators.

-------
                                     -55-
                                CHAPTER 1
                              BIBLIOGRAPHY
 1.  von Engel, A.,  Ionized Gases. Clarendon Press (1955).

 2.  Wannier, Bell System Technical Journal 32, p 170 (1953).

 3.  Loeb,  L. B., "Fundamental Processes  of Electrical Discharge in
    Gases, " Gaseous Discharge, J. Wiley (1939).

 4.  Loeb,  L. B., Electrical Coronas, Their Basic Physical Mechanisms,
    University of California Press, Berkeley (1965).

 5.  White, H. J., Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation, Addison-Wesley
    Publishing Co., Reading Mass. (1963).

 6.  Frank, N. H. ,  Introduction to Electricity and Optics, McGraw-Hill,
    New York, p 38 (1950).

 7.  Allis,  W. P. and  Brown, S. C.,  "Basic Data of Electrical Discharges, "
    Research Laboratory of Electronics Technical Report 283, Massachusetts
    Institute of Technology,  Cambridge,  Mass. (1958).

 8.  von Engel, A..  Ionized Gases, p  100, Clarendon Press  (1955).

 9.  Peek,  F. W., Jr.,  Dielectric Phenomena in High Voltage Engineering,
    3rd Ed.,  McGraw-Hill,  New York (1929).

10.  Sana,  M. N., "lonization in the Solar Chromosphere, "  Philosophical
    Magazine 40, Section 6, p 422 (July-December  1920).

11.  Cobine,  J. D.,  "Theory and Engineering Application, " Gaseous
    Conductors,  p 92, Dover Publishing, Inc., New York (1956).

12.  Shale, C. C., etal., "Feasibility of Electrical Precipitation at High
    Temperatures and Pressures, " U. S. Department of the Interior,
    Bureau of Mines (1963) T. N.  23.  U7 6325 622.06173.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -56-
il3.  Penney, G. W.  and Hammert,  G.  T.,  "Photoionization Measurements
     in Air, Oxygen, and Nitrogen, " Journal of Applied Physics 41,  No. 2.
     pp 572-577 (Feb. 1970).

14.  Brown, R. F., "An Experimental High Temperature, High Pressure
     Electrostatic Precipitator Module Design and Evaluation, " Research-
     Cottrell,  Inc. report.September 26,  1969,  Subcontract No. PH  198-3,
     to the U.S. Public  Health Service.

-------
                                    -57-
                                CHAPTER 2
                           THE ELECTRIC FIELD
      A preliminary discussion of the establishment of the electric field
was  included in the preceding chapter as it related to corona generation.  A
second and equally important function of the  electric field is to provide the
force required to remove the charged particles from the gas stream.

      The electric field in a precipitator is the result of two components:

      1) electrostatic field related to applied voltage and
         electrode geometry, and

      2) electric field related to the space charge caused
         by the presence of electrons,  ions,  and charged
         particulate in the inter- elect rode space.

      If one considers a wire and pipe precipitator, the field, before corona
is initiated, is only the electrostatic component.  The equation describing
this  electric field as a function of radial distance from the corona wire is:
where
         V  =  applied voltage

         a  =  radius of corona wire

         b  =  radius of collecting cylinder

         r  =  radial distance

This equation is valid up to the point where corona is initiated.

2. 1  SPACE CHARGE PHENOMENA

      With the initiation of corona,  current flows,  in the form of ions and
perhaps a few free electrons,  through the inter- elect rode space.  Under this
*Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -58-
dynamic condition Poisson's equation can be used to determine the field and
currents within the precipitator.  For cylindrical coordinates  this is:
      fv  +       dV_  +  JL   . 0                               (2.2)
      dr*     r    dr     €0

where

      V    =  applied voltage

      p    =  space charge density

      r    =  radius

      C0   =  permittivity  of free space

      The  space  charge for a single carrier species in the inter -electrode
space is related  to the  current density and electric field by the following
equation:

      j     =  N0eHE                                              (2.3)

where

      j     =  current density (amp/m2)

      N0   =  number, density of carriers (number /m3)

      e    =  electrical charge

      JLt    =  carrier mobility =  ratio between field and particle

                 velocity (ma/volt-sec)

      E    =  electric field =  -  ~- (volts /m)
      When multiple charge carriers are present, as in electrostatic pre-
cipitators, the current will result from three different carriers:  electrons,
ions,  and charged particulate.  For this case,  the current density equation

-------
                                  -59-


must be modified to

      j   = NgefJtgE  + Nje^tE  + NpqpeE                          (2.3a)

where

      Ng,  N|, Np,  = number densities of free electrons, ions,  and
                     particles, respectively.

      Jie, |ULp /u.p,  = respective carrier mobilities, and

             q e   = electrical charge carried by each particle.

      The space charge density p is defined as the quantity of charge per
unit volume of the interelectrode space and is equal to the summation of the
product of the number density of particles and the charge on each.

      p  = Nee  +  N.-e + N q  e                                   (2.4)
             e      i     p p

      For gases normally encountered in electrostatic precipitators,
sufficient quantities of  electronegative gases are present  to attach
essentially all of the free electrons.  Therefore, the terms involving
free electrons can be neglected, resulting in:

      j   = N^E  + NpqpeHpE, and                              (2.5)


      p  =  N{e  + Npqpe                                          (2.6)


Equation 2. 5 can be replaced by a  simplified expression which includes the
total space charge and  an equivalent mobility.  The expression for the
equivalent mobility can be determined by the relation:

                                   E = p^E  + PpMpE            (2.7)
                                                SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -60-
from which
      Meq
            Pi Mi
                      Pi+Pp
_Mp_

Mi
(2.8)
                                 Mi
          Mn
but since 77^ « 1,  Equation 2.8 can be approximated by
where
Meq  =  p   Mi


     =  equivalent mobility of the total space charge

 Pi  =  ionic space charge density
 p.p  =  particulate space charge density

  p  =  Pi +PD = total space charge density.
                                                                (2.8a)
      Poisson's equation relates the electric field to the space charge.
The space charge is related to the current density by
         3  =
             PM
                      eq
                          (2.9)
from which
                         Pi   2ffrjLiiE
                                                                (2.10)
      Even though the ratio p/Pi has some variation with radius,  the
average ratio of ionic space charge to total space charge can be approxi-
mated from the measured voltage-current characteristics of the particu-
lar installation.  If the current corresponding to the applied voltage is
known for a no-dust-load condition, the ratio of ionic space charge to total
space charge is very nearly the ratio of current density at loaded con-
ditions to no-load conditions for a fixed voltage.  Expressed as an equation:

-------
                                  -61-
               JA
                                                                   (2.11)
               JNL

                      v = constant applied voltage


where


      j    = actual current density under loaded conditions, and


      J    = current density under no load.



      The  electric field can be determined from Poisson's equation by
substituting Equation 2. 10 for the space charge.


     -dV   +  -L dV  +   	iP       _  n
      dr*      r  dr
                dV
But since E = - -r ,  Equation 2. 12 can be modified to
The solution to 2. 13  is
       E  =  -   -  -   - (TT-  _ +                            (2. 14)
                dr       V                 2  ;
where C is a constant of integration and needs only to be independent of r.


      If we designate the breakdown field strength of air as Ec and solve
Equation 2. 14 with the boundary condition that the electric field at the outer
edge of the corona glow  region is equal to Ec, we have
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -62-
where r0 is the radius of the glow region, typically somewhat greater than
the radius of the corona wire electrode.  Substituting Equation 2. 15 into
2. 14 yields
                  r°Ec
                                                                  (2.16)
      The breakdown field strength,  EC,  has been determined semi-empiri-
             3
cally by Peek to be:

     Ec = 3xl(fCTd(l + 0.3V/d7a  ) kV/m = 30md(l + 0.
                                                               kV/cm
                                                                  (2. 17)
where
      m   =  roughness factor for the corona wire (0. 5 - 1. 0),

                                   T  P
      d    =  relative air density  =	 ,

   T, P   =  temperature (°K) and pressure (mmHg), respectively,

  T0,  P0   =  293°K and 760 mmHg, and

      a   =  radius of corona wire (cm).

      The voltage-current relations can be determined from Equation 2.8
by integrating the electric field from the surface of the wire to the collection
electrode.  If we designate a, b  = radius of wire and pipe  respectively we
find
     V  =
from which
                                     /
                                     (
             roEc
                                     1+.  71+  -rr
                                                   .
                                                   ip
                          -  1  -  In
                 1 +
                                                                  (2.19)

-------
                                  -63-
       The corona starting voltage,  V0,  can be determined by applying the
 boundary conditions when i = 0,  r0  = a,  which yields
            [•
                                •1
      V0 =  aEc   | In ^- - 1 - log 1 + 1  I  = aEc In -H-


Substituting Equation 2. 17 for EC. we find
                                                                  (2. 20)
V0  =  30amd(l + 0.3
                              In
                                         kV
 Equation 2. 19 is strictly correct for the voltage-current relationship.
 Since r0 is somewhat indefinite (radius of the glow region),  an approximation
 to reduce Equation 2. 19 to a more usable form is worthwhile.  The substi-
 tution of  (a)  for (r0) will not modify the value significantly, so that a more
 workable approximation for Equation 2. 19 is
V  =
                aEc
                                      - 1 - In
                                                                  (2.21)
 For moderate and high currents, the log term will be small in comparison
 to the numerical term.
      In
                        ip
                                   2  -
 For this case,  Equation 2. 21 is approximately
      V  =  V0 +
               y-
                                 ip
                                          - 1
                                                                 (2.21a)
      Equation 2. 21 contains a term that is the ratio of total space charge
to free ion space charge.  This ratio changes significantly as a function
of position in the precipitator.  In the input section the heavy dust concen-
tration is electrically charged.  This large space charge tends to quench
the current and bind the free ions to the point where the ratio of total charge
to ion charge becomes very large, with the current flow drastically reduced.
As the gas moves through the precipitator, the dust is collected to the point
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -64-
that the space charge contribution of the dust is reduced and the charge ratio
in this region approaches a value of 1.

      For detailed calculation it becomes important to determine the value
of this space charge ratio.  A general idea about the voltage-current
characteristics can be  determined by assuming that the dust does not con-
tribute to the space charge.   This assumption leads to large errors in the
inlet section, but is reasonably accurate for the outlet section.   The value
for the electric field is valid,  but this assumption leads to errors in the
current, and therefore, the free  ion density.  When making detailed calcu-
lations,  such as would  be desirable for designing or analyzing precipitators,
the value of this ratio must be known.   It is interesting to note,  that if p /p^
is set equal to one in Equation 2.  21, the dust-free voltage-current charac-
teristics will result.   This equation then becomes identical to the one
developed by White4 neglecting dust space charge.

      There are two techniques for obtaining an estimate  of the  ratio of the
total to ionic space charge in an installation.  If the particle size distri-
bution,  dust loading and electric  field are known, then the total charge carried
by the dust can be determined.  Similarly, the  dust charge density can be
found if the surface area of the dust per gram,  dust loading, and electric
field are known.

      In the first case, the dust concentration as a function of particle size
is known, and the saturation charge for each size range is determinable.
If the total charge per cm3 is then multiplied by the volume flow rate of the
system,  the total current required to remove the dust is known.  The ionic
charge density can be determined from the current density-electric field
data.  The actual current carried by the particulate is only a small per-
centage of the total current in the precipitator.  This  can be verified as
follows.  The mobility of an object driven by an electric field is defined as
the ratio of the  velocity to the electric field.


      ^  =  "E                                                    (2.22)

      The mobility of negative ions,which are customarily present in
commercial installations,is generally on the order of  2.2 cm2/volt-sec.

      The mobility of the dust will, in general, be a function of the spe-
cific particle size distribution in  the precipitator.  The value for each
size range will  be the ratio of migration velocity (w) to electric field (E).

-------
                                 -65-
As an estimate of the average mobility,  the migration velocity for the
mass median diameter (mmd) is a reasonable choice.  The theoretical
migration velocity for 10/J. particle in an electric field of 3 kV/cm,  with
standard gas condition, is

             n™       2e0E0E_a
      w  =   -SL^_  =        H>   =  0.44 m/sec =44 cm/sec       (2.23)
            6 TTarj        rj
and the mobility of the dust from Equation 2. 22 becomes

            44 cm/sec            ,__2     cm2
      *V   3x103 V/cm     =  L46xl°
the ratio of the dust mobility to the ion mobility is

      ii                n
     ——=    — '—iT* -  =  6.6xlO~3  or less than 1 percent.     (2.24)
      ^          &. &


Therefore,  the space charge due to the charged dust would have to be 100
times the space charge due to free ions in order for the two currents to be
equal.   In general, the current carried by the dust can be neglected in
comparison to that carried by the free ions,  even though the charge bound
to the dust may be equal to, or perhaps even greater than, the charge
appearing as free ions.

      If the current carried by the dust is negligible, as is generally the
case, then the ionic space charge can be determined from the current
density- electric field equation  given previously

      j   =  N0eME                                                (2.3)

Substituting typical values for the parameters we find


    AT        .1     _   1.3xlQ-8  A/cm2           _    __i2              3
    N0e  =  -*=-   -  - —a -        v  =2x10   Coulombs /cm3
            ME         22  £m_ x 3xlQ s _V_
                           V-sec         cm                    (2.25)

The ratio of total charge to ion charge can be stated as
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -66-
P
               pd  + pj       5. 8x10- "  +  2x10-"
      Pi           Pt                 2x10-lz


Similarly, if the percentage of the current carried by .the dust is known,
then that portion of the current can be subtracted from  the total current
density,  and only that component carried by the free ions need be substi-
tuted in Equation 2. 25.

      The ratio of total charge to ionic space charge can be determined
as a function of position within the precipitator.  If the  collection efficiency
per foot is known for each size range, then the percent of dust removed
corresponds to the percent of space charge removed with the dust.  Thus
the dust space charge can be incrementally corrected as a function of
position within the collector.

2. 2  PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE ELECTRIC FIELD

      The effect of the electric field is manifested in two ways in the
precipitation process.  First the charge on each dust particle is proportional
to the peak value of the electric field  for field charging; and second, the
force acting  on each particle is proportional  to both the charge on the
particle and  the average value of the electric field in the vicinity of the  dust.

      The electric field at any point within a  precipitator is caused by
three factors.   The applied voltage and the particular geometry of the
unit res.ults in an electrostatic type of field which is modified ,by the
presence  of a space charge.  Both free ions and charged particulate con-
tribute to this space charge.

      The remaining concern is  to provide an electric field of sufficient
magnitude to move the particulate to the collection electrode.  This field
can be provided by any or all of the above methods.

      In a single-stage precipitator, corona current flows throughout the
entire precipitator.  The electric field is a result of all three factors
listed above.

      In a two-stage precipitator,  a large value of corona current flows in
the first section to provide a region of relatively high concentration of
free ions. No great concern is given to the collection efficiency in;this

-------
                                 -67-
region because the prime function is to charge the dust.  The charged dust
is then carried into the second stage for collection.  This section is normally
a uniform field produced by parallel plate electrodes,  and no corona current
flows.  The electric field in this section is caused by the space charge of
the dust and by the electrostatic field from a voltage applied between parallel
collection plates.

      The single-stage precipitator has a marked advantage for dusts that
are easily reentrained.  The corona current flow through the deposit
establishes an electric field that tends to hold the deposit against the
collection electrode.  The magnitude of this force holding the deposit is
proportional to the current density and the resistivity  of the dust.  In the
absence of ion current flow, this component of the retaining force will be
greatly reduced.

      The situation is somewhat different for dusts with high resistivity;
Large values of ion current may hold the dust so tenaciously that the
rappers become ineffective.  In this situation,  either a two-stage collector
or one with a greatly reduced current density in the primary collection
zone  may be required.                                   *

      Another problem resulting from the collection of high resistivity
dusts at high current densities is back corona.  The electric field in
regions of the deposit or on the surface may exceed the breakdown
strength of the entrapped gas.  Electron avalanche will be initiated on the
collection electrode which can lead to either increased sparking or stable
back  corona glow  spots distributed over the collection electrode.  These
factors are discussed more completely in the chapter  on resistivity.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                               -68-
                           CHAPTER 2
                         BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.  Frank, N. H., Introduction to Electricity and Optics, McGraw-Hill,
   1950.

2. Stratton, J.  A,,  Electromagnetic Theory,  McGraw-Hill, 1941.

3. Peek, F. W.,  Dielectric Phenomena in High Voltage Engineering,
   3rded.,  McGraw-Hill, New York,  1929.

4. White, H. J.,  Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation, Addison-Wesley
   Publ. Co., Reading, Massachusetts, 1963.

-------
                                    -69-

                                CHAPTER 3
                           PARTICLE CHARGING
      One of the fundamental steps in the precipitation process  is the
application of an electric charge to the particulate matter.  The dust
must be charged for the electric field to impart a driving force toward
the collection electrode.  This force is  the predominant factor in removal
of the particulate from the  gas, and is proportional to the magnitude of
the particle charge and the electric field.  The mechanism concerned
with the removal of this particulate is normally referred to as electrostatic,
even though there is significant current carried by both the charged ions and
the charged particulate.

      Particle charging is normally considered to take place  in the region
between the boundary of the corona glow and the collection electrode.  As
discussed in the chapter on corona generation, this region contains large
quantities of negative ions and perhaps some free electrons.  However,
there are positive  ions within the corona region, and some of the particles
passing into it will be positively charged and tend to drift toward the corona
wire under the influence of the electric  field.  However, most of the
particles will be carried out of the corona region by the turbulent gas flow,
and only those that are swept in close proximity to the corona electrode
will be  deposited.  The particles that are charged positively and do not
precipitate on the wire must first be neutralized and subsequently charged
negatively to precipitate on the collection electrode.  The bulk of the
particles, however,  pass between the boundary  of the corona region and
the collection electrode, and are charged by the negative ions which pre-
dominate in that region.  It is the negatively charged particles that are
of interest  in the precipitation process, and the discussions of the charging
process that follow will be with reference to the charging of particles by
a negative corona.

      There are two mechanisms responsible for the charging of particles
in an electrostatic  precipitator. These mechanisms are generally
referred to as field and diffusion charging.  Both mechanisms are active
in the charging; however,  each becomes more significant for particles
in a particular size range.  Field charging is the dominant mechanism
for large particles with a radius greater than about 0. 25M, while diffusion
charging predominates for small ones with a radius less than  about 0. 1/J-.
In the intermediate range both mechanisms contribute significant charge,
and therefore must be considered simultaneously.
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -70-

      Field charging is related to the ordered motion of ions under the
influence of an applied electric field.   This ordered motion causes collisions
between the ions and particles suspended in the gas  stream. Diffusion
charging results from ionic collisions with the particles brought about by
the random thermal motion of the ions in the gas.  If these ions are retained
by the dust particles, the particles become electrically charged.

      Much work has been done on the theory of particle charging.  Field
charging theory leads to a straightforward expression for the charge
acquired in terms of the applied electric field, physical dimensions, and
dielectric  constant of the particles.  Rohman1 in  1923 was the first to derive
a valid expression for field charging, and Pauthenier2 rederived Rohman's
equation in a slightly different form in 1932.  White3 also gives a theoretical
analysis of field charging.

      Theoretical analyses of diffusion charging have primarily been made
with the assumption that this charging mechanism is independent  of the
applied electric field.  While this is definitely not the case in an  electro-
static precipitator,  it leads to equations with an analytic solution. If the
effect of the applied field is included, then the  equations cannot be solved
in closed form but must be solved  in an iterative fashion requiring either
a high-speed computer or an inordinate amount of time.  Arendt and
Kallman published the first analysis  of this mechanism in 1926.  White3
derived an expression that is similar to that of Arendt and Kallman.

      Several approximate solutions have been determined for  the diffusion
charging mechanisms in the presence of an applied electric field.  These
techniques make use of the computer  and match the  experimental levels
of charge with varying degrees of success.  The  results of several
investigations, including Liu,  et al.5  and Murphy, et al. ,6 are discussed
in this report.  Liu utilizes Hewitt's7 experimental data in verifying his
theory.

3. 1  FIELD CHARGING

      The  theoretical analysis of field charging is generally made with
three simplifying assumptions.  These simplifications are necessary to
*Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.

-------
                                      -71-

 avoid obscuration of the physics of the mechanism by the mathematics of
 the analysis.  These  assumptions  are:

       1.  The particles are considered to be spherical.

       2.  The field from one particle does not modify the field in the
          vicinity of another particle.

       3.  The particles and ions are suspended in a region permeated
          by a constant electric field.

       The presence of particles with a dielectric constant greater than unity
 will cause a localized deformation in the electric  field as is illustrated in
 Figure 3.1.  The negative ions move rapidly toward the collection electrode
 under the influence of the applied electric field.  These ions tend to travel
 along electric field lines in the direction of maximum voltage gradient, and
 since the field lines intercept the particulate matter, the ions will collide
 with the particles and impart a charge to them.  This charge will be
 maintained on the surface of the particles by what is generally termed an
 image charge force.  The image charge, as described in electrostatic theory,
 is caused by the electric field associated with the  ion.  As an ion is brought
 into the  region near a particle, the internal charges of the dust particles
 are displaced such that an attractive force exists between the ion and the
 particle; see Figure 3.2.

       As the ions continue to impinge on the dust particles,  the charge on
 them will increase until a sufficient electrostatic field is established in
 the vicinity of the particle by the retained charge to effectively  repel
 additional ions flowing to the particle.  This leads to a field configuration
 in the vicinity of  the particles  as illustrated in Figure 3.3.

   Derivation of the field charging equation.  If a conducting sphere of
 radius a with a net charge q is suspended in a uniform electric field E
 in the presence of a unipolar ion concentration N ,  the electric field
 in the vicinity of the sphere will  consist of two components:  (1) the self-
 field caused by the  charge on the particle and (2) the applied field as
 modified by the presence of the conducting particle.  The expression
 describing this field can be derived from the principles of electrostatics.8,9
Stated in MKS units:
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                             -72-
Figure 3.1  Electric Field Modified by the Presence of an Uncharged
            Conducting Particle.

-------
                        -73-
          O
Figure 3. 2  Induced Electrostatic Charge in
            Particulate Due to Proximity of Ion.
                                        SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                               -74-
Figure 3.3  Electric Field After Particle Acquires a Saturation
            Charge.

-------
                                    -75-
      E   -   3E0Cos0 - q/47re0a2                                 (3.1)

where

      E   =   the resultant electric field,
      6   =   the angle between a point on the sphere and electric
               field as shown in Figure 3. 1,  and
      e0  =   the permittivity of free space.

The term 3 E0 Cos 9  is the expression for the modified field due to the
presence of a conducting sphere.

      The rate of change of charge to the dust particle with respect to
time is defined as the current. The ion current is equal to the integral
of the current density times the differential active charging area:
             /0°jdA  =  ./o°(N0e/ZE)dA                             (3.2)
                                  -     -^ ) dA

where

      q   =   charge on the particle,
      M   =   mobility of the  ion,
      e   =   electronic charge,
      j   =   current density = N0eME
      9   =   limiting angle for charge flow to the particle,
     dA   =   element of area = 27Ta2 Sin0 d0 , and
      t   =   time.

Equation 3. 2 shows that charge will continue to flow to the particle until
the field from the charge just balances the applied external field, at
which time a limiting charge is acquired.  Since the electric field in
the vicinity of the particle (  E ) is zero,  this saturation charge,  for
a conducting particle,  can be determined  by setting Equation 3. 1 to zero
when Cos 9=1,  or:
      qs  =   12ffa2e0E0.                                            (3.3)
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -76-
Cos &  is set to one for the saturation charge because 9 approaches zero
as the particle charge increases.

      Similarly, the limiting angle 9Q for charge flow to the sphere for any
state of charge, can be determined by setting E equal to zero in Equation
3.1 and solving for Cos 6 :
      Cos 6>
                  12 Tra2 e0E0
                                      (3.4)
      The time behavior of the charge can be determined from Equation 3.2:
                        e
         dt
(3 E0 Cosfl  -
                                                      Sin0
                  6 ffa2 E0 N0e
        / ° Cos 6  Sin 0 d 0 - -——-
        o                     12Jra2e0E0 o
 a
/ ° Sin 6 d 9
and since the charge is independent of 9 ,  Equation 3. 2 can be integrated to
yield (with qs = 12ffa2e0E0)
         -*L  =   67ra2
         dt

                       + i-
                                        i. -  _a_
                                      (3.5)
         dt
                                     Q  2
                                  - —
                                        )  and rearranging
                                      (3.6)

-------
                                    -77-
      9
                  -  3ffa2E0 N0 e jbt dt,  which can be readily
integrated to yield
  s
— -_^  =  3ira2E0N0eHt + K,,
                                                                   (3.7)
and applying the boundary condition that at t = o  q = o

      KI  = qg   which yields for Equation 3.7
      qs-q
                   Nnejitt    <
                    4e         )» which yields after rearranging     (3.8)
 q
 q
               N0e/ut
                      +
and if we designate  r =
 t + 4en
    N0e/i

the charge as a function of time becomes
      q(t)
                       t
which represents the charging characteristics of a conducting particle
a precipitator.

      The  modification for nonconductive particles is to introduce a

factor  —^-=-  into the equation for saturation charge (Equation 3.3) where
        6+2
e = relative  dielectric constant, which yields for the saturation charge
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -78-


for a general particle


                        ire0a2E0

This leads to an expression for the charge as a function of time


      q(t) =
                 c ~r MJ     ~        i*  >  •       »  M -i— 	
                                                    t

      The previous analysis for field charging was made with the system
of units known as  rationalized MKS. White'and Moreau-Hanot and
Pauthenier  derived their equations in the electrostatic system of units
(ESU) which leads to equations that are  consistent with  the MKS units.
These equations are  included for completeness.
              Nge =
        r  =
3.2  DIFFUSION CHARGING

      Under the assumption that diffusion charging is independent of the
electric field,  an equation can be derived relating particle charge to
particle size, conductivity, etc.  Collisions between ions and particles
occur because  of the random thermal motion of the ions.  The ions collide
with, and are retained by, an  induced electric charge on the particle
as illustrated in Figure 3.2.

      The diffusion charging process can be described in terms of the
kinetic  theory of gases.   If a particle of radius a, carrying n elementary
charges, is located  in a medium containing unipolar ions, the net current
flow to  the particle can be determined.  The molecular density N of a gas
in a potential field can be described by the following general equation:

-------
                                   -79-
      N   =  N0exp   V
                     KT

where

      N0  =  average number of molecules per unit volume (density),
      V   =  potential,
      k   =  Boltzmann's constant, and
      T   =  temperature, "Kelvin.

If this general  equation is  applied to the case of a specific density of gas
ions in the vicinity of a suspended charged particle, then

      V   =  -  -92-                                              (3.11)
                 r

      N   =  N0exp(- J£r)

where

      r   =  the distance  from the  center of the particle to a position
               in space.

Then,  at the surface of a particle of radius a, the density of ions with
various energies becomes:

      N   =  N0


from which the number of  ions per second which collide with the particles
becomes:

     JiY_  . (4 TTa2) =  7Ta2Nv
       4
where

       v  = rms thermal velocity of the ions.
                                                SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -80-
If every ion that collides with the particle is retained, then the rate of
change of charge with respect to time (ion current) becomes:
-jjSL   .  *a>evN0e*p   -St.
                                   )
and for a Maxwellian distribution, the rms velocity is related to the
temperature of the gas by the equation:
      f-   -   a'el-p-)   N0exp(-^)                   (1.13.)


and m is the mass of the particle

       m   =  (4/3)?ra3d

       d   =  the mass density of the ions.

Integration of Equation 3. 13 with respect to time yields the charge on the
particle as expressed by the following equation:
      q(t)  =
                               K JL
      It is worthwhile to point out that no saturation charge exists for the
diffusion charging process as derived  herein.  This is due to the  fact that
the range of thermal velocities does not  have an upper boundary limit.  The
expression for the probability of finding  an ion with a given velocity is
a. monotonically decreasing function, but this probability distribution does
not go to zero.  Therefore, regardless of what electrostatic potential the
particle has, there is a nonzero probability of finding an ion with sufficient
energy to overcome that potential and  impact with the particle.  However,
as the potential of the particle increases, the probability of  impact
decreases until the diffusion charging  rate decreases significantly.

-------
                                   -81-
      A similar expression was cited by White,  previously developed by
Arendt and Kallman,4 which had for the rate of change of charge with
time the following equation:
which yields essentially the same charge as a function of time that White's
(Equation 3. 14) does.

      Field charging is more significant in the majority of precipitator
applications than diffusion charging because, typically, the great  majority
of the material to be collected consists of particles greater than 0. 25M
radius.  For example,  the  mass of a 25/^ particle compared with  a 0. 25
one of the same density is greater by a factor of 10°,  or stated more
simply,  it takes one million 0. 25^ particles to equal  the mass of  a 25j^t
one.  However, as precipitator design approaches 100% collection
efficiency,  the collection of the very small particles becomes more
significant and the consideration of the diffusion charging mechanism
becomes more important.

3. 3  COMBINATION OF FIELD AND DIFFUSION CHARGING

      In the intermediate range of particle sizes  both charging mechanisms
contribute significant charges.  Since the previous analyses neglected one
of the charging mechanisms in the derivation of the charge; it would be
erroneous to merely add the net charge of the two mechanisms.  In this
analysis, it is more nearly correct to  sum the rates of charging from the
two mechanisms and then solve for the charge.  Utilizing the charge rate
for field charging from Equation 3. 6 and for diffusion charging from
Equation 3. 13 leads to an expression for the charge rate of
     Ji-  =  J!S- M -  -9L V  a.  *  ™   /8kT7r  „ /. JUL i
             (1 _ J-)  + a eN
      dt        T   v     q  '          *J   m   CAt/ v  akT7
                         *s
/
               qc
dq    _   4s     Jq_
dt        T      T
                                                                  (3.15)
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -82-
Equation 3. 15 is a nonlinear differential equation with no analytic solution.
Approximate solutions to the  above equation can be determined by the
use of iterative integration methods.

      However, the above equation was derived with the assumption that
diffusion charging was independent of applied electric field.   The justifi-
cation for this assumption was that when considering diffusion charging
in the absence of field charging, it led to a solvable equation.   In the
above analysis, this justification is no longer valid and computer techniques
would be required for a  solution.  Since a computer is required in the
solution to the above equation, several  investigators  have attempted to
extend the theory to include the charging characteristics in the presence
of an applied electric field.  These investigations have led to expressions
that more nearly match  experimental data.  These investigators include
Murphy, Adler, and Penney6  and Liu and Yeh.5

       Murphy derived a  formula for the charging of small particles in the
presence  of an applied electric field.  The results of this work are shown
in Figures 3.4 and 3. 5,  where two computer solutions to the differential
equation for charge rate are compared with the previous theories of
White and Kallman and with experimental data.  The technique provides
a much better agreement with experimental data indicating that the
electric field does have  significance in the diffusion charging process.

      The theory described in this paper takes  into account the modification
in ion distribution around the particle and the velocity distribution in a
particular direction caused by the  applied electric field.  This leads to a
differential equation for charge rates that can be approximately solved by
a finite difference method of iterative integration.

      Liu reviews the previous diffusion and field charging theories.  He
then develops a unified charging equation where the effects of both field
and diffusion charging are combined.  The charge rate is derived from
the electric potential field caused by both the charge on the particle and
the modified external field.  The charging mechanism is divided into two
regions such that  both field and diffusion charging are simultaneously
active until the saturation field charge is acquired by the particle.  At
this point,  the electric field caused by the charge on the particle exceeds
the applied field and field charging stops.

-------
                            -83-
CO
0>
s:
U

•S
o>
,0
g
3
45


40


35


30


25


20


15


10


 5


.0
                              Experimental - Murphy
                                         5
Murphy - Approx. 2
            4


Murphy - Approx. 1
            3
                                       White
                                           •2
           1 Kallman
                    Saturation Field Charge
                 a  =  0.15 micron
               E0  =  2.65 kV/cm
                     N0t x 10
                          8    10    12
                            -13 ions-sec
           14
                                            16
                                   nr
     Figure 3. 4 Number of Elementary Charges Vs. Ion
                Density and Time for Various Theoretical
                Analyses.
                                           SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                      -84-
   1. Field Charge Saturation, 10.8 and 0. 6 kV/cm, respectively.
   4. Diffusion Charging (Neglecting Electric  Field) Not s 107 ions sec/cm3.
 2,6. Liu Diffusion Charging, E0 = 10.8 and 0.6 kV/cm, respectively.
 3, 5. Hewitt Experimental Not = 107 ions sec/cm3,  E0 * 10.8 and 0.6 kV/cm, respectively.
   7. Penney, N0t • 6.4xl07 ions sec/cm3, E0 = 2.3 kV/cm.
 lOOO
m
0)
tin
J? 100
u
•8
V
XI
B
   10
     /   Electric Field = 10.8 kV/cm
            j	I
                      1000
    0.2
                       100
10
0. 8     1.0   1.41.8        0. 2

         Particle Size,  Microns Diameter
                                                             o. e
                                                                     i. o
                              1.4 1.
   Figure 3. 5.  Particle Charging Characteristics - Number of Charges
                 Vs.  Particle Size.   Comparison between Hewitt's
                 Experimental Data and Various Charging Theories.

-------
                                    -85-

      In the second regime,  only diffusion charging is active.  The ion
density adjacent to the particle is approximated,  and this, together with
the thermal velocity distributions, leads to a modified diffusion term in
the presence of an applied electric field.

      This theory provides an expression for charge as a function of time
for all sizes of particles.  When compared with experimental data, the
agreement is very good.   Liu's approximation predicts charges somewhat
higher than experimental data.  This may be due  to the fact that the ion
density was determined along the directions of the applied electric field
and assumed to be independent of relative position around the particle.
There is a possibility that the point where the ion concentration was
determined is  higher than the average concentration around the particle.
This would lead to a constant error in the diffusion charge rate as shown.
Liu's theoretical results are compared with Hewitt's experimental data
in Figures 3. 5 and 3. 6.

3. 4  PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PARTICLE CHARGING

      The development of the theory of particle charging was  based on  ,
assumptions for a highly idealized case.   The idealizations include such
things as uniform and constant applied electric field and free  ion density  •
in the vicinity  of a single particle.  The conditions in an operating
commercial installation are considerably different from this idealized
situation.

      The first significant difference is  in the applied voltage. The
power supply typically derives a direct voltage from the alternating
voltage of the commercial electric power by either full-wave  or,
half-wave rectification.  The output  from the power supply is typically
supplied to the precipitator in an unfiltered condition,  although the
distributed capacitances and effective resistances of the collector system
act as a filter.  The voltage on the unit swings  through a range of values
during each cycle of input power to the unit.  Sketches of the type of
variation expected in an installation  operating from half-wave rectification
systems are shown in Figures 3. 7a and  3. 7b.

      The variation in applied voltage causes a corresponding change in the
corona  current.  Since the voltage-current characteristics of a precipitator
system are of the form

      I  =  KVn                                                   (3.16)
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                            -86-
     Hewitt's experimental data corresponding to the different

     field strengths are shown adjacent to Liu's theoretical plot.

     The standard field charge for each field strength is also shown.
   30




   25




a  20

%


&  15
U

o
  01
  JO
  a
   10



    5



    0
        0
                        A
                        3
                          FC - 10.8 kV/cm
       FC - 3.6
kV/cm
	., fc
                        FC - 0.3 kV/cm
                        		   f c
2     3456

  N0t x 10"13  ions-sec
                                                 8
                                   m-3
Figure 3. 6.  Number of Elementary Charges Vs. Charge Density

             Time Product for 0. 06 Micron Radius.

-------
                                   -87-
5 kV/cm
4 kV/cm
3 kV/ctn
2 kV/cm
1 kV/cm
a.  Peak to Average Value: 1.63
b.  Peak to Average Value: 1.45
                                0. 0167
                              Time-sec
                                              0.033
       Figure 3. 7  Electric Field Variations as a Function of Time at a
                   Particular Point in Space Caused by the Variation in
                   the Applied Voltage from the Power Supply.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
where n is a number greater than 1 and K is a linear coefficient, the
percentage current change is greater than the percentage voltage
change in the installation.  The variation in voltage and current causes a
two-fold change in the charging characteristics of the dust particles.  The
charge on a particle is directly proportional to the electric field, which is
related to the applied voltage.   The particle will tend to acquire a saturation
charge dictated by the peak value of the applied electric field.  The particle
will accept charge during the interval of time that the applied electric field
in the vicinity of the particle exceeds the self-field from the charged
particle.  When the  applied field drops below that from the  charge  on the
dust, charging ceases until the next cycle of input from the power supply.10
This charging time constant is effectively increased by the  reciprocal of the
percentage of the time that ions flow to the particle.  This percentage
decreases as the particle attains a near saturation charge.

      The charge rate is proportional to the free ion density near the
particle.  The free ion density is related to the current density in the
interelectrode space.  As the voltage drops between the conduction periods
of the power supply,  the  current and current density are reduced according
to Equation 3.16 above.   This reduction in free ion density  causes  a further
increase in the charging time constant. The single factor of voltage
variation with time is reflected in two related effects, both of which cause
an increase in the time required for a dust particle to acquire  a near
saturation charge.

      A second significant variation from the idealized case is the variability
of electrical conditions within the precipitator.  The dust particles are
transported through the  unit by the gas stream.  At the inlet of the pre-
cipitator, large quantities of uncharged dust are introduced into the inter-
electrode space for  charging.  As the particulate acquires charge,  the
free ions become attached, resulting in a rapid decrease  in the free ion
density.

      This cloud of charged dust represents a significant increase in
space charge which tends to quench the corona current.  Since the  free
ion density is proportional to the current density,  this factor causes a
further reduction in the ionic space charge in the charging section  of
the preceipitator. The charging time constant will be significantly greater
for an industrial precipitator than would be expected from an analysis
where the incremental behavior of the process was neglected.

-------
      The significance of the above factors can be illustrated by estimating
their effect on the behavior of a typical installation,  with values for
pertinent parameters as follows:

         Collection efficiency           90%
         Dust load                      3.4 grains/acf
         Volume flow rate               1. 7 x 10° acfm
         Collection electrode area       1. 06 x 105  ft2
         Gas velocity in collector        7. 5 ft/sec
         Average electric field          3 kV/cm
         Average current density        30 x 10'9 amp/cm2 = 28 MA/ft2
         Length of precipitator          12 ft

If average conditions are assumed to exist throughout the precipitator,  the
charging time constant is computed from the average current density and
charging field.  The  free ion density is computed as follows:


      N0  =   	30 x 10-9 A/cm*	  =  2.85 x 107ions/cm!
             1. 6 x 10-19Cou x 2'2cm x 3  x 103 V/cm
                               V- sec

          =   2.85 x 1013ions/m3.

The charging time constant from Equation 3. 8 (MKS units) is:

               	4 x 8. 85 x 10"12 F/m	  = 3J

               2.85  x 1013 -^H_x 1.6x 10"19Coux2.2x 10"4  "'
                             nr                              V-sec

About ten time constants are  required for the particle to acquire 90%
saturation charge; thus the particle is considered to be charged within
about 350 milliseconds, or a  little over 1/3 second.   This corresponds
to a travel of about 2. 6 ft through the unit.

      Next,  consider the time required for the particles to charge to a  90%
saturation charge when the electric field varies  as shown in Figure 3. 7a and
3. 7b. These plots represent the effect of half-wave operation of the  rectifier
system with precipitator discharge  characteristics approximated by a
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -90-
sirnple R-C filter network.  .Figure 3.7a and 3. 7b represent the voltage vs.
time for a unit with an effective discharge time constant of 10 milliseconds
and 15 milliseconds,  respectively.  Both examples are  based  on an average
value of the electric field of 3. 0 kV/cm.

      Figure 3.8 illustrates the variation in charge as a function of time
for dust with a charging time  constant of 35 milliseconds.  The 90% satu-
ration charge for the 4. 9 kV peak is attained after about 1. 35  seconds,
whereas it is attained after 1. 17 seconds in the 4.35 kV peak case.  This
should be compared to the time required for the pure direct current case,
where a saturation charge occurs after ten time constants or 0.35 seconds.
Therefore,  the dust acquires  a 90% saturation charge after traveling
distances of 10. 2 and 8. 75 feet through the precipitator, rather than the
2. 6 feet originally expected.

      It is evident that the actual charge on the dust is greater for the
variational case than for the steady case because the particle  charges
toward the peak value of the field.   If comparisons are made between
waveforms with the same average value, the particle charges  toward a
higher final value for the high peak-to-average-value waveforms.  The
actual gain in using high peak-to-average-value waveforms is  not as
great as would be expected  from a cursory examination. The  effective
charging time constant  increases for the high peak-to-average situation.
A tradeoff must be made between charging time and peak value in order
to arrive at the best collection efficiency.  This will be  covered in greater
detail in the chapter on precipitator systems analysis.

      The next variation to consider is the effect of the  introduction of
the  uncharged dust into the  inlet section. Equations  relating the electric
field  in the interelectrode space to the current  density and space charge,
and the current density to the applied voltage are given  in the  chapter on
the  electric field.  These equations show that for a fixed voltage, the
electric field is almost independent of dust space charge to total space
charge density.  Therefore, the addition of dust in the interelectrode
space results in a decrease in the current in the inlet section  with a
similar reduction in the free ion density.

      This reduction-in free ion density increases the charging time
constant proportionally.  Qualitatively,  the current is carried almost
exclusively by the free  ions.  Since current quenching is normally observed

-------
c

X
m


Z

a

5

>
3

H
0.167
                                                                                                         	1  Peak Value: 4.9 kV





                                                                                                  90% Saturation






                                                                                                  	2  Peak Value: 4.35kV





                                                                                            90% Saturation





                                                                                                         1 Expanded
                                                                                                         f





                                                                                                         2 Expanded
                                                                                                         **—




                                                                                                         3	Peak Value: 3 kV
                                                                                     Charge for Constant Field
                                                               0.083      0.10     0.117

                                                             Time Scale for Expanded Range
                                                                                 0.167
0.333
0.50
0.667
0.333
                           1.167
1.333
1.5
                                             1.667
                   Figure 3.8  Charging Characteristics for Various Waveforms With 3 kV/cm Average

                                 Values.
                                                                                                                               CO
                                                                                                                               »-»
                                                                                                                               i

-------
                                   -92-
in the inlet sections of operating installations,  the charging time constant
will be expected to increase in this section.  The magnitude  of this increase
can be estimated from the knowledge that the precipitator collection
efficiency equation is  an exponentially decaying function of distance through
the precipitator.   An estimate of the modification to the space charge caused
by the dust can be made from this.

      If an installation is operating at a collection efficiency of 90%, then
the dust concentration at the outlet section is 10% of that in the inlet.  Thus,
the space charge at the inlet section caused by the dust will approach a
factor of 10 greater than that at the outlet.  From this, the current density
in the first foot of the unit could be expected to be significantly less than
that at the outlet,  with the result that  the charging time constant would be
greater.

      If the charging time  constant for the installation based on average
current densities were about 35 milliseconds, then the charging time
constant vs.  position within the unit would be an exponentially decreasing
function, with an average value over the 12 ft length of 35 milliseconds.
This corresponds to a charging time constant vs. position as given by
                                                                   (3.17)
                          JL-i

where

      T0   =  the charging time constant at inlet = 90 milliseconds,
      x   =  the distance through the precipitators, ft,
      L   =  the length of precipitator - 12 ft,  and
      a   =  numerical coefficient.

These factors yield

      T(X) =  90 exp ( - —'-r£- ) milliseconds.                       (3. 17a)


Thus,  the charging time constant at the inlet is approximately 90 milli-
seconds,  whereas at the outlet it approaches 9 milliseconds if the
average value is 35 milliseconds.

-------
                                   -93-
      The effect of the above factors is to increase the time required for
the dust to acquire a saturation charge.   If one were to assume that the
dust is charged to saturation instantaneously,  then the Deutsch-Anders on
efficiency equation in the simplified form would apply. However, when the
delay in particle charge is considered, the efficiency per foot of precipitator
is reduced by a factor of the ratio of actual charge to saturation charge.
This factor leads to situations where the quantity of material removed in the
first foot of the unit can be reduced by as much as a  factor of 10 from that
which would be expected when charging time is neglected.

      The variation in charge vs.  time for a system  operating with a
time constant of 350 ms rather than the  35 ms average for the installation
is shown in Figure 3. 9.  In practice, the time constant would gradually
change from  the low charge rate at the inlet to the higher values as the
individual particle traverses the installation.  These and other dynamic
effects are discussed in detail in the chapter on precipitator systems
analysis.

      The charging of nonspherical particles  was investigated by Smith
and Penney.10  They show that the nonsphericity is in general not a problem
when the charge is given in terms of the  charge per unit area of the indi-
vidual particles.   Thus, for irregular particles, the  surface area per unit
volume of particle would suffice as a charge parameter.  This factor will
lead to a somewhat greater charge on the particles than would result from
the spherical assumption.
                                               SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -94-
     0.167     0.333
0.50     0.66?    0.833
            Time, sec
1.0
1.167    1.33
1.50
Figure 3.9  Charge Vs. Time in a Field of 3 kV Average, With Charging
            Time Constant as a Parameter,  Peak/Average = 1.63.

-------
                                   -95-
                              CHAPTER 3
                            BIBLIOGRAPHY
  1.  Rohman, H. , "Messung der Grbsse  von Schwebeteilchen," Z. Phys.
     .17, 253 (1923).

  2.  Pauthenier, M.  M. and Moreau-Hanot,  M. , "La Charge des  Particules
     Sphgriques Dans un Champ Ionise", "  Journal de Physique et le Radium
     3, 590(1932).

  3.  White, H. J. , Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation,  Addison-Wesley
     (1963).

  4.  Arendt, P. and Kallman,  H. ,  "The Mechanism of Charging Mist
     Particles," Z.  Phys. 315,  421 (1926).

  5.  Liu, Benjamin Y.  H.  and  Hsu-Chi, Yeh, "On the Theory of Charging
     of Aerosol Particles in an Electric Field, " J. Appl. Phys. 39, No. 3,
     1396 (1968).

  6.  Murphy,  A. T., Adler, F. T. , and  Penney, G.  W. , "Theoretical
     Analysis of the Effects of an Electric Field on the Charging of Fine
     Particles,  "Paper 59 - 102, AIEE Winter General Meeting,  New York,
     February 1959.  Published in Communications and  Electronics,
     September 1959.

  7.  Hewitt, G. W. ,  AIEE Trans.  76_,  300 (1957).

  8.  Stratton,  J. A., Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill (1941).

  9.  Frank, N. H.., Introduction to Electricity and Optics, McGraw-Hill
     (1950).

10.  Smith, P.  L. and  Penney, G. W., "Charging of Nonspherical Particles
     in a Corona Discharge, " AIEE Trans.  80, Pt. 1, p 340 (1961).
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -96-
                                 CHAPTER 4
                          PARTICLE COLLECTION
      Fundamental electrostatic theory establishes that a force will
act on a charged particle under the influence of an electric field.  The
magnitude of this force is dependent upon the  charge on the particle and the
strength of the electric field.  The direction of the force depends upon the
polarity of the particle charge and the direction of the electric field.

      Simplified concepts of particle collection often consider that the
electrostatic forces predominate,  and that motion of the particle toward the
collection plate is governed primarily by the electrostatic forces.  However,
in a full size precipitator,  the aerodynamic forces associated with highly
turbulent gas flow predominate,  so that for particles smaller than about 10/u.
dia, the motion of the gas stream  almost completely determines the particle
trajectory through the precipitator.  Near the  collection plate, gas turbu-
lence is reduced, and electrostatic forces predominate.   The collection of
an  individual particle therefore depends on the probability that it will enter
the region where the electrostatic forces result in its deposition on the col-
lection surface.

      In addition to the domination of the particle motion by the gas flow in
the central regions of the precipitator, other factors influence particle
collection.   Once a dust layer is formed on the collection electrode,
impingement of a particle being precipitated can reentrain those previously
collected. Scouring  of the dust layer, reentrainment of dust during rapping,
and unusual  electrical conditions,  including sparking and  back corona,  can
also alter the basic collection process.  In developing a fundamental theory
of particle collection, these factors are neglected in order to simplify the
derivation and facilitate understanding of the collection  process.  Effects
of these factors  on collection are discussed following derivation of the
basic collection theory.

4. 1 PARTICLE KINETICS

      The motion of a charged particle suspended in a gas and under the
influence of  an electric field is governed by Newton's laws of classical
mechanics.  One technique used to formulate equations  for the solution of
problems in  kinetics  is d'Alembert's principle, which states that the
summation of all forces acting on a body is equal to zero.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -97-
The four principal forces acting on a particle in a precipitator are:

      (1)  gravitational force

               Fg =  mg,

      (2)  electrical force

               Fe =  qE,

      (3)  viscous force

               F  =  BJTarjw, and finally

      (4)  inertia force

               Fj  =  mdw/dt

where

               E  =  electric field,
               q  =  charge on the particle,
               i?  =  viscosity of the medium,
               a  =  particle radius,
               w  =  velocity of the particle,
               m  =  mass  of the particle,
               g  =  acceleration of gravity.

A free body diagram of the above forces acting on a particle is  shown in
Figure 4.1.

      If we consider a particle  suspended in a stationary gas with a
coordinate system as shown in  Figure  4.1, then according to the laws of
mechanics we have:

                   - fr  -  F  -  F'/ \  = 0
                     *e    rrj    ci(x)    u

                   ' Fg  -  Fi(y)  = °

                   = 0

-------
                             -98-
O
                                       Fex
           
-------
                                    -99-


The resultant motion of the particle can be determined by solving the above
set of equations.

      The coordinate system was chosen so that no forces exist in the z
direction, therefore, there will be no particle motion in that direction.
The gravitational force for particles encountered in gas  streams is,  in
general, very small in comparison to the electrical and  viscous forces,
and can be neglected.  Typically, the gravitational force is  at least two
decimal orders of magnitude smaller than the electrical force.

      The only remaining equation of any consequence is that for the  x
direction

      Fe - Fn " Fi = °                                             &• V

which upon substitution yields


      qE  -  67Tar?w - m  —  = 0                                   (4. la)
                        dt
rearranging

    '  dw   .
                         ,  .  .                                    ,.
                       = (q/m)E                                  (4.
Equation 4. lb is a linear differential equation with constant coefficients,  the
general solution of which is the sum of the homogeneous solution and a
particular solution.   Solving for w gives:
         qE
w   =   —a—
                         ,       f
                         1 - exp (
                                      m
(4.2)
      The term,  m/6JTar), denotes the time constant T of the motion.  The
velocity w essentially reaches its terminal value within five  (5) time
constants.   Thus, the relative residence times necessary for various
particle sizes to acquire a terminal velocity can be determined.

      For example,  consider the particles to be unit density
(d = 1 gm/cm3 =  103 kg/m3)  spheres for which the mass is

      m =  4/3  7Ta3d

-------
                                    -100-


The exponent factor of Equation 4. 2 becomes

                m        4/37Ta3d        2a2d
                                                sec
For MKS units with a particle density of lO'kg/m3


             2x 103a2
                 9rj

Since for atmospheric air, the viscosity is about 1. 8 x 10" poise = 1. 8 x 10"
kg/meter-sec, the equation for the time constant as a function of particle
radius becomes

      T  =   1.23xl07a2

where a is given in meters or

      T  =   1.23 x 10"5 a2 sec

where a is the particle radius in microns.  A plot of the time  constant (T)
for unit density particles suspended in atmospheric air is shown in Figure 4.2

      Residence time for dust in a precipitator typically ranges from 2 to 5
seconds.  Thus,  for particles up to about 50/J.  diameter,  the acceleration
time is short compared to the residence time in the collector.  The larger
particles (50M and above) are generally collected entirely, and the  residence
time for smaller particles is long compared to the acceleration time;
therefore,  the exponential part of Equation 4. 2 can normally be neglected.
The neglect of the exponential term is equivalent to ignoring the Newtonian
acceleration force.  Thus Equation 4. 2 becomes

      w  « qEp/Gffan                                           (4. 2a)

      Equation 4. 2a is a valid expression for the migration velocity of all
particles normally encountered in electrostatic gas cleaning,  where q
represents the charge on the particles.  As discussed in Chapter 3, there
are two charging mechanisms active  in electrostatic precipitators.  It is
customary to derive migration velocities in terms of field charging alone.
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                      -101-
            20   30    40   50    60
          Particle Diameter - Microns
Figure 4.2.  Acceleration Time Constant (7) as a Function
             of Particle Diameter.

-------
                                    -102-
Since a particular charging mechanism may dominate for a certain size range
of particles, we will derive migration velocity expressions utilizing each
charging mechanism. The field charging expression applies to particle
sizes greater than 0. 5/^ diameter, while the diffusion charging expression
applies to those particles smaller than about 0.
      Substituting Equation 3. 10 for q in Equation 4. 2a
                                            E
      w  =  12       -   »€a'E
where after simplification yields

            2e  enEnEK,a      i
      w  =
(4.3a)
              (e  + 2)n •   (1 + T It)


For particles with a high dielectric constant which have attained a saturation
charge, the factor 	5- approaches unity and r It approaches zero,  which
                   C  H~ 
-------
                                   -103-
      In the size region between about 0. 2 and 0. 5jU,  both diffusion and field
charging are significant,  and hence the migration velocity would be that
associated with the combined charge resulting from the two charging regimes.

      The migration velocity related to field charging is useful for most
types of dusts.  However, one should realize the limitations under which the
equations were derived, and that they do not apply to very fine dusts and
fumes.

      Another  modification to the previous migration velocity equations  is
necessary for  very small particles.  The equation as stated applies to
particles where Stokes1 law governs the equation of motion.  For smaller
particles,  the  Cunningham  correction factor is applied to the  equation for
migration velocity.  Under these conditions, the expression for migration
velocity as given in Equations 4.4,  4. 5, and 4. 6 must be multiplied by a
factor (1 + A — ), where
             a

      A  = mean free path  of gas molecules,
      a  = radius of the dust particles, and
      A  = a numerical factor.

Note that the Cunningham correction factor is significant for small particles
in the size region where diffusion charging  is important.

4. 2  PARTICLE COLLECTION WITH LAMINAR GAS FLOW

      Although laminar flow is  only obtained in some laboratory models,
and approached in only a  small percentage of the commercial two-stage
precipitators,  it is informative to begin the discussion of the  theory of
particle collection with the laminar flow model.  In this  model, the maxi-
mum velocity point is generally associated with the center of  the pipe,
and reduces with increasing radius.  If we neglect the variation of velocity
with radius,  and assume  a  "plug" type flow, we can assign a velocity, Vg,
to both the gas stream and  the dust through the pipe (see Figure 4. 3 for a
sketch of this flow system).

      Charged dust particles  in an electric field will attain a velocity
(w) towards the collection electrode.  Since there are only two velocity
components related to the dust  motion,  the  net velocity is the vector sum
of these two components.  Since all dust particles will flow in this same
resultant direction,  a dust-free zone will develop in the  center of the pipe

-------
                          -104-
                                          R
              vr -  Resultant Velocity
Figure 4.3. Length of Precipitator Required for 100%
            Collection for Idealized Laminar Gas Flow
            in a Pipe Precipitator of Radius, R.
                                         SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -105-


 and grow to fill the entire pipe as the gas flows through a distance (L) that
 is determined by the pipe radius R,  gas velocity v and migration velocity w.
 The equation relating these quantities to the length required for 100 percent
 collection efficiency is:

       L  =  -32-                                                  (4.7)
               w
 This assumes that there  is no erosion or other reentrainment losses
 within the precipitator.   Since migration velocity is proportional to
 particle  radius  (field charging), it becomes necessary to size the precipitator
 for the smallest particles expected in the dust.

       This idealized case occurs so infrequently that it is almost of academic
 interest  alone.

 4. 3  PARTICLE COLLECTION WITH TURBULENT GAS FLOW

       In  all practical precipitators,  the gas flow is turbulent and the motion
 of a dust particle  will be primarily the  result of the turbulent gas flow, gas
 motion caused by  collision between neutral gas molecules and the ions
 driven by the  electric field (electric wind) as well as the migration velocity.
 Therefore, the  specific trajectory for any one particle cannot be completely
 predicted for  this case.

       The equation for the collection efficiency of an electrostatic precipi-
 tator was discovered experimentally based  on  field tests by Anderson in 1919.
 Deutsch  derived a similar equation based on theoretical considerations  in
 1922.  In the early 1950's, White2 derived an identical expression based on
 the probability of  collection for a single particle.  Both derivations lead to
 collection efficiency equations of the form

       rj  =   1 - exp (- — w)
                        Vg
 where
       r?   =   collection efficiency,
      A/v  =   specific collection electrode area,
       w   =   particle migration velocity.
*Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.

-------
                                   -106-

The exponential collection equation has also been verified by laboratory
experiment,  and is generally accepted as describing precipitator performance.
Since Deutsch is credited with the initial development of the theory of
collection, equations of the above form which relate to precipitator operation
are known as Deutsch-Anderson efficiency equations.

      The development of the original Deutsch-Anderson equation was based
on several simplifying assumptions.  These were:

      (1)  The particles are considered to be fully charged immediately on
introduction into the collection system.

      (2)  Turbulent and diffusive forces  cause the particles to be distributed
uniformly in any cross section. (This assumption is more restrictive than
necessary in actual practice.)

      (3)  The velocity of the gas stream does not affect the migration
velocity of the particle.

      (4)  Particle motion is governed by viscous drag where Stokes' law
applies.

      (5)  The particle always moves at its electrical terminal velocity.

      (6)  Dust particles are sufficiently separated so that their mutual
repulsion can be neglected.

      (7)  The effect of collision between ions and neutral gas molecules can
be neglected.
                  I
      (8)  There are no disturbing effects such as erosion,  reentrainment,
uneven gas flow distribution or back corona present.

      As  a review of the original derivation,  consider a single charged
particle in a wire and pipe precipitator suspended in a gas stream under
the influence of an electric field.  The particle will acquire a velocity (w)
in a direction toward the collection electrode as described by Equation 4. 2a.
In the central turbulent region of a precipitator, the electrical migration
velocity is small in comparison to that component due to the gas flow.   But,
in a boundary zone of thickness (6 ),  the gas flow will be laminar because
of the friction between the gas stream and the wall.  An example of the
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -107-
velocity distribution as a function of radius is shown in Figure 4. 4.  In this
boundary layer, since the gas flow is laminar, the resultant velocity for a
dust particle will  be the vector sum  of the gas velocity and the drift velocity.
Therefore,  in an increment of time At, all the dust particles present within
the boundary layer (6 ) will be driven to the collection electrode if

      6  =  wAt

During this same  interval of time, the gas stream will have moved through
the precipitator a distance

     AL =  vAt

where v is the average gas velocity.

From these conditions,  the incremental equation for particle removal  can
be established

     AN _   S6   _    SwAt        SwAL      wAAP
      N  "   Ad        Ad         Adv     = "   Adv              (4.8)

where

     AN =  particle  concentration removed,
      N =  particle  concentration in  the gas stream,
    AAC =  incremental collection area = SAL
      S  =  circumference of pipe
     vg  =  volume flow rate of gas = Adv
     Ad =  cross sectional area
      v  =  gas velocity

Passing to the limit with Equation 4.8, we find

                                                                  (4.9)
      N      Adv           Vg

Integration of Equation 4.9 yields an expression for the particle concentration
at the precipitator outlet.

      N  =  N0exp ( -

-------
                         -108-
Position
                                                   g
                                 Gas Velocity
                                                     vgxQ
      g
  vgxQ
actual gas velocity.distribution,
average gas velocity outside boundary
  layer x quality factor,  and
boundary  layer.
Figure 4. 4.   Possible Gas Distribution in a Precipitator
              Duct.
                                          SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -109-
where N0 is the particle concentration at the inlet.  The collection efficiency
can be stated as the ratio of particles removed to the inlet concentration.

      r,   =   Nn -  N   =  1 _     (__^cw_)                         (4.10)
                1\                    V
                 0                   vg


      White derived an identical equation based on the probability of a
particle being collected in a circular wire and pipe precipitator during an
interval of time, At.   If the particle is within a distance, wAt,  of the collection
electrode, it will be trapped by the electric field and will be collected.  Then
the probability of collection within a given interval of time  is the probability
of the particle being located within the outer annulus.   Since the particle has
equal probability of being located at any point within the cross section, then
the probability of collection,  Pc, is the  ratio of the area of the annulus to
the cross-sectional area of the precipitator.

      The probability  of escape within each section AL, is

    P'   =  1 - P   - 1    2wAt
      es          c          R  •

and the probability of  escape through the complete precipitator is the proba-
bility of escape in one section raised to  the power of the number of sections
in the unit
                                                                   (4. 11)
      "-           *•             4TV11

where

      At  =   total time divided by the number of sections considered on the
             precipitator.

Algebraic manipulation yields an equation identical to that previously derived
in Equation 4. 10.

      A somewhat more general expression of the same form will result if
the original assumptions are somewhat modified.

      (1)  The dust particle concentration, Ng,  in the collection layer, 6,  is
          proportional (but not necessarily equal) to the average particle
          concentration,  N0, in any cross section.

-------
                                   -110-
      (2)  The effective gas flow through the precipitator can be described
          as the product of the average gas velocity, vg, times a quality
          factor,  Q.

      (3)  The collection layer thickness,  6,  is defined  as the distance away
          from the collection electrode to the point where the migration
          velocity,  w,  is equal to the linear velocity of the gas stream down
          the precipitator in the laminar flow region.

In the central region of the precipitator where the gas velocity and turbulent
velocity components are large compared with the migration velocity,  the dust
trajectory will be random.  In this  region the effect of  the migration velocity
will be  negligible.  But, in the region near the wall,  in the collection zone,
the longitudinal velocity is limited by the frictional forces of the wall.   The
translational velocities are effectively reduced,  while the migration velocity
component towards the collection electrode  remains constant.  In this  col-
lection  layer,  6, the migration velocity dominates and all particles within 6
will be  removed within an incremental time, At,  which is defined by the
relation

      At  =   6/w

      In the collection layer, the migration  velocity causes all particles
within the distance,  6,  from the wall to be collected within a time, At.
During  this time the gas moves a distance AL = v QAt.  The number of par-
ticles in a particular size range removed will be the product of the number
density of particles  in the boundary layer and the volume of this region
cleared, or

     AN  =  -NcSwAtAL                                            (4.12)
              o
The number of particles within the volume of the precipitator defined by the
length,  AL, and the cross section of the pipe is

      N  =   N^AL                                               (4.13)

which yields an equation for the increment of particles removed

    AN  _   NgSwAtAL _   N6 Sw     =  N§  Sw  AL
     N   -'   N0AdAL   =~ NQAd        ^  Ad  vQ
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -111-
where

      Ng  =  particle concentration in the boundary layer,
      v   =  average gas velocity, and
      Q   =  quality factor for the gas flow.

Passing to the limit we have

      ^. = -^..|_._^_dL                                 (4.15)
       N     N0   Ad     vQ

      Integration of Equation 4. 10 yields an expression for the particles col-
lected or removed
                         N,     Sw
       N  =  N0exp( -- 2- -- L).                          (4.16)
                         N0    AdvQ
The efficiency can be determined from
Nn  -  N                 N5        SL
         »  1  -  exp (-  —  •  -

                                                         .
                                                        w)
which can be expressed as
                                o

      The derivation for the collection efficiency given above relates the
collection efficiency of an installation to the migration velocity of the dust
particles.  Since the migration velocity of dust particles is dependent upon
the particle size as well as other factors, the equation as stated applies
specifically to a particular particle size for which the migration velocity
is given.  Thus in the strict sense,  the Deutsch-Anderson equation applies
only to a group of particles for which the migration velocity is known.  If
the performance for a typical dust is desired, it is necessary to separate
the specific particle size distribution into several discrete  size ranges,
compute the migration velocity and  collection efficiency for each size range,
and then determine the overall  efficiency.  This is discussed in more detail
in Chapter 8,  Systems Analysis.

-------
                                   -112-
      Equation 4. 17 differs from the previously described Deutsch-Anderson
equation in two respects:  the particle concentration in any cross section,
and a quality factor,  Q, can be used to modify the average gas flow rate
through the precipitator.

      The  quality factor, Q, is included to provide a means to modify the
efficiency  equation for installations with a highly uneven gas flow.  The
Deutsch-Anderson equation utilizes an average gas velocity, v.  In the above
derivation, the average gas velocity is multiplied by Q to yield an  effective
gas velocity.  The factor, Q, could be different for each precipitator instal-
lation and  must be determined individually.  For installations with a rela-
tively even gas flow the numerical value of the factor would approach unity,
while in some extreme cases,  it could approach a value of 2.  A numerical
example will show some insight into the manner in which  the uneven  gas
distribution could cause a variation in the overall efficiency of an installation.

      For  this example, consider a simplified precipitator where a uniform
gas flow exists in each of four identical areas of the unit, as depicted in
Figure 4. 5.  The average gas  velocity for this example is determined by
summing the products of the velocity and the area, which yields  an average
gas velocity of 2. 5 v where v is an arbitrary value.  If the expected col-
lection efficiency for this unit  with a uniform  gas flow of 2. 5v is 90%,  the
Deutsch equation can be used to determine the value of the exponent,

      rj  = 99% = 1 - exp ( -  g A™   ),

from  which
                      ,j.

      Aw/2. 5v  = In  1QO_r?   = In  100 = 4. 6.

      The  example can be analyzed as if the simple precipitator in Figure
4.5 were really four individual precipitators with different gas flow rates.
The percent of material not removed in each precipitator could be expressed
as Aj,  A2, A3, A4, as follows:

      At = exp ( - -^-)  =  exp ( -  11.75)  = 0.000007
                      O

      A2 = A3 =  exp ( -   Aw   )  =  exp (- 5. 875) =  0. 0029
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                    -113-
               g
              2V
                 g
Figure 4. 5.  Assumed Gas Flow Distribution for
            Quality Factor Example. Average
            Velocity Proportional to Average
            Volume Flow Rate = 2. 5 v .
                                    5

-------
                                  -114-
     \ = exp (- ^2L.)  =  exp (-2.35) =  0.0954
                 5 vg

The total material escaping is then the weighted sum of that lost in each
section, or

 ATotal = °-4887

for constant loading per cu ft, From this,  the overall efficiency can be
expressed as

      q .»-°-«"  ,.8.8. 94.4».


The efficiency for the  actual case is  about 4. 6% less than expected for
one with the average flow.

      The numerical value for the quality factor can be determined from
the relation

      O - i   100   4. n    100   _ In 100 _  4.6
      V ~    100-Th  '     100-T)a "  lnl8  "  2-9

      Q = 1.6

Therefore for this example,  the  effective velocity is 1.6 times the average
velocity.

4. 4  FACTORS MODIFYING  THE PARTICLE
    COLLECTION IN  A PRECIPITATOR

      Several factors can lead to a significant change in the collection
efficiency of the idealized precipitator as described in the section on par-
ticle collection theory.  These factors include particle agglomeration,  back
corona, uneven gas  flow, and erosion and rapping reentrainment,  among
others. Most of these factors tend to decrease collection efficiency.
However,  agglomeration would result in  a larger effective particle size and
would tend to increase collection efficiency.

      The migration velocity of a particle is proportional to the radius of
the dust, as seen from Equation  4.3.  As the particles agglomerate, the
ratio of electrostatic force to aerodynamic drag increases,  with a resultant
                                                SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -115-
increase in migration velocity.  Thus as the particles agglomerate, the col-
lection efficiency of the precipitator tends to increase.

      Electrical sparkover and back corona are two related phenomena that
tend to decrease  the collection efficiency of electrostatic precipitators.
Electrical sparkover results when a localized gas breakdown occurs across
the interelectrode space.

      The phenomena of spark initiation have been studied extensively by
Loeb3, Penney? and others.  In terms of electrostatic precipitator per-
formance, the following factors are significant.

      (1)  Spark initiation occurs at the anode.

      (2)  Spark initiation is influenced by the  magnitude of the electric field
          near the anode.

      (3)  Propagation of a  spark depends on the magnitude of the applied
          voltage.

      For a negative corona,  the magnitude of the electric field near the
collection electrode is  related to the resistivity of the dust and the current
density according to the equation

      E  = jp

where

      p  = electrical resistivity,  ohm-cm.

      The influence of the electric field on sparking can best be explained
in terms of the voltage-current curve, Figure 4. 6.  The voltage impressed
across the electrode of a precipitator will result in a current flow, the
magnitude of which will depend upon the gas composition, temperature,
pressure,  and precipitator electrode dimensions.  If the electrodes are
clean, the voltage can be increased until sparking occurs.   If the collection
electrode has a dust layer with a resistivity of around 10  ohm-cm, a
current density of 10"6  amp/cm2 will result in a field in the deposit of
around 10 kV/cm  (indicated by Point A in Figure 4. 6).

-------
                          -116-
                                     A-p
                                     B-p
                                     C-p
                                              .10
                                         10 " ohm-cin
                                         5xlOl° ohm-cm
                                         10U ohm-cm
 e
 o
"a
 S
 rt
 0]
 £
 e
 0)
 3
U
   13.80
          40
10.35   <30
£  6.90   120
    3,45   U10
                20   40    60   80   100
                Applied Voltage. kV
Figure 4. 
-------
                                   -117-
      A further increase in the resistivity to 5 x 1010 ohm- cm causes the
electric field in the deposit to reach 10 kV/cm at a current density of about
7 x 10~7 amp/cm2 corresponding to Point B on Figure 4.6.  Since spark
initiation will occur at a lower voltage due to the higher field at the anode,
the precipitator will operate at Point B.  If the dust resistivity is further
increased to 1011 ohm- cm,  the same field in the dust deposit will result from
a current density of only 10"8 amp/cm2.  Consequently, the voltage and
current at which the precipitator operates will be further reduced and oper-
ate at Point C on the curve.

      As  resistivity of the dust layer is increased,  a point will be reached
at which the  applied voltage will be inadequate to propagate  a spark across
the interelectrode space.  Under these conditions,  the current and resistivity
will be such  that breakdown of the  gas  in the interstitial regions of the dust
layer will occur.  This condition results in the formation of a corona in the
dust layer.   The resulting positive ions formed travel across the interelectrode
space toward the discharge electrode.   These ions  will impact upon dust
particles  in the interelectrode region and neutralize or reduce the charge
present on the dust due to the negative ions flowing from the region of the
discharge electrode.

      The effects  of sparking and back corona  influence precipitator oper-
ation in several ways.  Within the  range of resistivities where sparking
occurs, operating voltage and current  are reduced  over that of a clean
electrode precipitator.  The electric field is  reduced by virtue of the
reduced voltage and current,  and the charging time is increased by virtue
of the reduced current.  In a sparking  mode, the precipitator is  momen-
tarily deenergized during the interval of the spark.   Consequently, the
efficiency is influenced in proportion to the total deenergization time.

      The effects  of uneven gas flow, erosion, and  rapping reentrainment
were discussed previously and need  not be repeated here.

4. 5  PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PARTICLE COLLECTION

      The Deutsch-Anderson equation,  rj = 1  - exp  (- *$-. w), is widely used
to describe the performance of precipitators.  Because of this wide ac-
ceptance, a general term, effective migration velocity (EMV) or precipi-
tation rate parameter,  is customarily associated with the collection
efficiency of installed units.  The value of the EMV can be determined when
values are known for the collection area (A), volume  flow rate (vg), and
efficiency rj .

-------
                                   -118-
This w is not the velocity with which particles move toward the collection
electrode as given in the previous section, rather it is the net average
migration velocity for an average particle which would result in the
measured efficiency for a particular installation, and therefore is,  in effect,
a performance parameter.

      Several factors contribute to the fact that the precipitation rate
parameter is different from the theoretical migration velocity.  These
factors include reentrainment, uneven gas flow, particle size distribution,
and back  corona,  and have been discussed individually in other sections of
the report.   Collectively, the result is a net flow of particles from the wall
back into the precipitator such that  the effective flow toward the collection
electrode is reduced.

      Thus, while the precipitation  rate parameter is useful for describing
the actual performance of a precipitator,  care should be exercised in order
to insure that the value of this number is understood to be related only to
the performance of a precipitator, and not to any real measurable velocity
of particles toward the collection electrode.

4.6  RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEUTSCH EQUATION

      It is generally recognized that the basic Deutsch-Anderson equation
has a number of limitations principally associated with the assumptions
made in the derivation.  Several investigators have attempted to modify the
basic Deutsch equation so that it would more  nearly describe precipitator
performance.

      Cooperman3 states that the Deutsch equation neglects  the role of
diffusional forces in the precipitator which can account for the variation
between observed and theoretical migration velocities and the apparent
increase  in the precipitation rate parameter with increasing gas velocity.
Cooperman postulates that the difference in particle concentration along
the precipitator length gives rise to a diffusional force which results in
a particle velocity through the precipitator that is  greater than the gas
velocity.  At low gas velocities,  the effect is pronounced, but is masked
at higher velocities.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -119-
      In addition to the linear diffusion, Copperman suggests that a
difference in particle concentration would result in a back diffusion if
the particle concentration at the collection surface were higher than
that within the central sector,  and hence result in a lower migration
velocity.

      Cooperman suggests an equation of the form

      r,  = 1 - exp [.- 0/a (1 -       )  -- ]                        (4.20)

where
      b  = half width of the precipitator duct (comparable to radius),
      L  = precipitator length,
      f  = ratio of particle transport away from the collecting electrode to
                the  migration velocity towards it,
      w  = electrical migration velocity (theoretical),
      Dx = particle  diffusion  coefficient in the direction of the gas flow,  and
      v  = mean gas transport velocity.

If we perform a few algebraic manipulations the exponential term can be
made to appear more like the Deutsch terms.   This is desirable because
of the widespread use of the Deutsch equations.
                          -                        =-          (4.2D
Now let us add a factor (h) = height of the collection electrode from which

      L. x  JL   = __£_                                            (4.22)
      b      h     Ad

where

     Ac  = collection electrode area,  and
     AJ  = cross-sectional area of the duct.

-------
                                   -120-
Thus the product of #/<* and  —- becomes
                            b
      0/a-x ±-  =  U-f) 2L .  h.                                  (4.23)
            b           vg    Ad

and vx AJ = the cross-sectional area of the duct times the mean gas
velocity which is the volume flow  rate (y±) of the preeipitator. /Therefore,
Equation 4. 24 becomes
      (l-f)w
                vg
Equation 4. 20 can be rewritten with more familiar terras so that

      i?  = 1 - exp-[-(1-f) (1 - -~-) A w ]                      (4.24)
                               .3
-------
                                  -121-
but (we- wr) is merely the net particle velocity towards the collection
electrode (wn) so that Equation 4. 24a becomes
       n  -  l-expt-U-V^M-11^-)]                       (4.24c)
      Therefore, the new theory developed by Cooperman is closely related
to the original theory developed by Deutsch, and takes into account two
factors which can significantly modify the electrical and convective
parameters used in the original derivation.  These factors can bring theory
and practice into better agreement.

      No experimental verification of this theory was included.

      Robinson derived an equation for collection efficiency* which also
offers  an explanation for the wide disparity between the precipitation rate
parameter and the  theoretical migration velocity.  In this analysis, two
erosion terms are  introduced.  The first erosion term is proportional to
the density of dust  particles in the boundary layer.  Erosion of this type is
based on the concept that the greater number of impacts between dust particles
and the deposit layer, the greater the quantity of dust that will be reentrained.
The second  erosion term is a constant term such as one would expect to find
with a  constant velocity gas stream flowing near a collected layer of dust,
which for a  fixed velocity should give a constant erosion rate.  These two
factors are  combined to yield an efficiency equation which is a modified
Oeutsch equation.


     „  =   l - (l -  _£__ )exp[- (1 - a) X w A/Vg-  -*L-]      (4.26)
                     1 -  or                        s   1 - a

where

     a  =  coefficient of the variable erosion,
     /3  =  coefficient of the constant erosion,
     X  =  ratio of dust concentration near the wall to the average
                concentration in the cross section, and
w, A, v  =  standard precipitation parameters.
       o

-------
                                   -122-


Equation 4. 26 can be algebraically  manipulated to become


     rj  =  (1 - -y-M  0 - exp [ - (1 -  a)X w A/vg ]}         (4. 26a)


which corresponds to modifying the Deutsch equation in three respects:

   (1)  The entire equation is multiplied  by an erosion sensitive
       term, 1 - j3 (1 - a).

   (2)  The particle concentration near the wall can be different
       from the average particle concentration (X).

   (3)  The migration velocity is modified by the variable erosion
       effect, w-eff = (1 - a)w.

      The  two papers discussed above represent the more significant
attempts to bring the theoretical and experimental aspects of precipitation
phenomena into closer agreement.  Experimental verification of one of
the above models appears to be necessary to resolve the differences,  if in
fact differences exist.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -123-
                              CHAPTER 4
                             BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.    Deutsch,  W., Ann, der Physik 68, p 335 (1922).

2.    White,  H. J., jndustrial Electrostatic Precipitation, Addison-
      Wesley (1963).

3.    Cooperman, P., "A New Theory of Precipitator Efficiency, " Paper
      No. 69-4. APCA Meeting, New York City (1969).

4.    Robinson, Myron, "A Modified Deutsch Efficiency Equation for
      Electrostatic Precipitation, " Atmospheric Environ 1,  No. 3, pp
      193-204 (May 1967).

-------
                                   -124-
                               CHAPTER 5
                               GAS FLOW
5. 1  INTRODUCTION

      Gas flow is important in the precipitation process for a variety of
reasons.  First, the gas volumes handled can be large so that the cost
of equipment can be high if high pressure drops are involved. The power
costs also will be excessively high if large losses occur in the duct.  An
even more important consideration, however, is the uniformity of the gas
flow entering the precipitator.  Severe nonuniformity causes erosion of
the collected dust from hoppers and collecting electrode and  causes
variable gas treatment times  in the precipitator.  The  combined effects
can cause marked reduction in precipitator performance,  often as much
as 20-30 percent.  Poor gas flow can also result in excessive deposits of
dust on ducts,  turning vanes,  elbows,  and distribution  plates. These
deposits can further alter the flow pattern and result in further nonuniformity
of flow.

      The fundamentals of fluid flow are covered in many standard texts
on fluid mechanics.  Basic types of flow are defined depending upon the
gas velocity, duct size, and gas properties.  One of the most important
dimensionless  parameters in fluid flow is the Reynolds number which is
defined as
      «. -
where
      p   =  gas density,
      v   =  velocity of gas,
      M   =  viscosity, and
      D   =  equivalent diameter based on wetted perimeter

                 (D  =  4     area
                         perimeter

      If the Reynolds number is less than critical (about 2000 to 26fOO
in a duct),  the flow will be laminar and the velocity profile across the
duct will be parabolic as illustrated below.  In this type flow, the
maximum velocity is twice the average for a cylindrical pipe.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH' INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -125-
      When the Reynolds number is greater than critical, any small
disturbance will not die out but will continue to grow until the gas flow
has fully developed turbulence. The flow profile will have a boundary
layer that increases in velocity from zero at the wall up to the mean
velocity of the core of the flow.  With reasonably constant average
velocity and turbulent flow, the maximum  velocity will be about 110%
of the average velocity.  The velocity profile will be nearly parabolic
in the boundary layer and nearly flat,  but fluctuating, in the core:
                                3
      With an uneven velocity distribution,  the maximum velocity can
be much higher than the average velocity and the profile can be almost
any shape.

      All large size precipitators operate well into the turbulent region.
Typical values for Reynolds numbers for electric precipitators are
10, 000 and higher.  The gas flow in all practical sizes of duct work is
also in the turbulent region. Gas flow in duct work is subject to wide
variations in velocity distribution.

      When a duct changes cross section, the velocity profile changes.
In a converging transformation, the velocity vectors must increase to
compensate for the smaller area of cross section.  If the profile is
reasonably constant,  the magnitude of the vectors  change with little

-------
                                 -126-
variation between maximum and average velocity.  However,  with a
diverging transformation,  the entering air tends to maintain its velocity
distribution because of inertia.   The flow separates from the wall, and
eddies form which tend to  grow to the full size of the duct because of
the large Reynolds number (see sketch below). The stream tends to
spread out slightly,  but separation will occur for diverging angles greater
than about 7° included angle.
      Separation will also occur on one side of a turn, as illustrated
below.
      Reverse flow ,in the separation zone as indicated above is common
 in flue systems unless special precautions are taken to prevent it.

      As illustration of the effect of a sudden transformation in cross
 section of a duct, let us consider the kinetic energy of the moving gas:

      At a point (1) upstream of a transformation:       (KE)j = 1/2 mvx2

      At a point (2) downstream of the transformation:   (KE)2 = 1/2 mv22.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                -127-
      The continuity equation for a square duct of side S would be:

      v    p m = Av = S2v;
       o
then
     . Vl  _  ,  _§2_


and
      \T
      V2
      (KE)i  _  1/2 mvt2  =  ,  vl   2   ,  S2  *
      (KE)2  "  1/2 mv22       v2  ) "   S, '•

or the kinetic energies vary inversely as the fourth power of the side
of the duct; thus doubling the  side of a square duct reduces the average
kinetic energy far downstream to 1/16 of what it was upstream.  The
other 15/16 of the energy must be dissipated in  turbulence and viscous
losses.

      The relationship of velocity to pressure, or "head" is based on
kinetic energy.  The velocity  head equals the kinetic  energy:


            1    2    1   P  2
      h  =  -5- mv  =  -s- —  v
            e>         &   g
or

      v  =

In English  units, we have

      p  =  pressure in inches water gage,

      w =  pounds per cubic foot, and

      v  =  feet per minute.
             w

-------
                                -128-
For standard air,  70°F at 29. 92 inches Hg barometer,
      v =  4005A/p"~~.
      Now, a loss due to friction in any part of duct system is a loss
in energy.  Therefore, the loss can be expressed as a function of the
"Velocity Pressure":
      p =  w
      Losses in elbows,  wyes, transformations, and so on, are often
expressed  as "percent of velocity pressure".  Some texts convert this
to "equivalent feet of duct".  Either kind of data can be used in the
calculation of friction losses in ductwork.

      There is also friction in the boundary layer.  This "wall friction"
depends on the Reynolds number  and on the roughness parameter of the
wall construction.  The roughness parameter is the variation in the wall

divided by  the duct equivalent diameter,  D = (4 x - : - - — ).  In the
        J                                      perimeter
large sizes of ducts  used in precipitator work, the  roughness would
generally be considered  "smooth", unless there were structural
protuberances,  rough welds,  extreme, corrosion, or severe dust deposits.
Numerical values of friction factors can be found in textbooks and
handbooks  such as the ASHRAE Handbook  (see  Figure 5. 1).

      The method of calculating frictional losses in gas  handling systems is
straightforward and  well developed.  The most  common form of expressing
frictional losses in straight runs of duct is that  described by the Panning
equation:

      A     fLpv2
      Ap=
where

      Ap =  static pressure loss:,

      f   =  friction of factor,



*Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH- INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -129-
i.o
                                       r TIT rii
                                        Wholly rough zone :
                                              £ roughness = .0333
                                              d
0.1
  1000
      Figure 5.1  Air Friction Vs. Reynolds Number and Roughness.

-------
                                -130-
      L  = length of duct,

      p  = density of gas,

      v  = velocity,

      g  = gravity, and

      M = hydraulic radius.

Let
      v  = Av  = volume rate of gas flow, and
       &

      M = -TJ-  = area/perimeter;
Combining the constants:

     Ap  • k  -?•
                                                  p
or pressure loss for odd-shaped ducts varies with —-  .
                                                  A3

         P       A3
      If  -£3 or —  is held constant, an approximate equivalent diameter
         JTl       Jt
can be calculated for any odd-shaped duct.  It will be approximate
because  the velocity used in the derivation is an average velocity
calculated from volume flow rate and cross-section area, twit the real
friction will be the sum of the friction due to  the actual velocity
distribution,  which is  never known exactly.  Therefore,  any form of
equivalent diameter calculation is approximate.  For example,  l«t us
compare the above with another form of equivalent diameter:
         ^    2ab
                                               SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                               -131-


where a and b are dimensions of a rectangular duct.
                     bb)'
                   2 (a + b)
                  a3b3
       64        2 (a + b)

Let b = Ka in both formulas


                  F+T
^5    16
D2  =  -F
                 tR      V*
      n   -  s /  lb      K
      Uz      '  7T2   K  +  1  '
          2Ka2           2K
and


      Di  =   a (K +  1)  =  a K + 1

when

      K  = 2,        Dx  =  1. 33 a

                     D2  =  1. 34 a.



      So the two formulae are almost the same if the aspect ratio, K,
of the duct cross section is  not too high:

when

      K  = 10,        Dx  =  1.82 a

                     D2  =  2. 12 a.

-------
                                -132-
The friction loss with such an extreme aspect ratio should be checked by a
model if possible.

      Friction,  however, is only part of the problem.  If sharp bends,
sudden transformations and rough walls in the system generate severe
turbulence and nonuniform  velocity profiles,  there will be trouble in
any equipment sensitive to  air flow.  Because fans, dust collectors,
and similar equipment are  designed on the basis of some average
velocity,  any extreme variation from that average may degrade the
operation.  For example, the standard fan test code calls for a straight
inlet duct 10 diameters long with a straightener 6 diameters from the fan.
If in the field,  a sharp bend is located at the fan inlet so that most of the
air is thrown to one side by inertia,  then part of the fan is operating unloaded
and the volume handled will be less than design by 10 to 15%.

      The best operating condition for an electrostatic precipitator will
occur when the velocity distribution is  uniform.  Because of the logarithmic
nature of the efficiency formula, an increased velocity in one plate section
will decrease the efficiency of that section more than the decreased velocity
in a parallel section would  increase the efficiency of that section. As a
consequence,  for a precipitator with nonuniform gas velocity, the total
plate area required to achieve a given efficiency will be greater than that
for a precipitator with uniform  gas velocity.

      Figure 5. 2 illustrates the adverse effect of uneven gas flow on
overall precipitator efficiency.   Efficiencies are plotted for each unit of
a 3-unit precipitator with 1/2,  1, and 1-1/2 meters per second gas flow
in the three units respectively.   Although the collection efficiency for the
average velocity is 97.3%,  the average  collection efficiency for the three
units is only 94. 5%.  In practice, for dry collection the actual loss in
efficiency would ve'ry likely be far worse because of reentrainment of
collected  particles in the high velocity zones.

      In order to describe nonuniformity of gas flow,  some  easily
understood means must be  employed, either qualitative, or quantitative.
The readings  of each row or column of a velocity traverse can be
plotted to arrive at a series of velocity profiles such as shown in
Figure 5. 3.  Alternatively,  an isopleth, or contour plot, of the lines
of constant velocity can be  constructed as shown in Figure 5.4.   These
methods  of plotting are useful in visualizing the velocity distribution
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INStltlJIF

-------
                         -133-
  100
  95

    o
o
c
0)
  85
  80
                        99.
                  91.0
                    Weighted

                     Average
                     Q4.  5
      0
     1         r^i
Velocity,  meters/sec
       Figure 5.2.  Collection Efficiency as a Function

                    of Flow Velocity.

-------
c
X
PI
z
JO
8
5
|


•1-4
o
o
i-H


CO

O
                                                                                                                     CO
                                                                                                                     i£t
                                                                                                                     i
                                                8    9    10    11
                                                 Traverse Points
                                                                    13
14
15
16   17  18    19   20
                                         Figure 5.3.  Gas Velocity Profiles.

-------
                                                                               CO
                                                                               CJ1
Figure 5.4.  Gas Velocity Contour Plot.

-------
                                   -136-
and in determining the location and type of corrective measures to be
taken.  Note that the velocity at the walls  in both these plots is zero.

      In order to reduce the nonuniform ity of the data on gas velocity
to a single quantitative measure,  statistical calculations can be made,
or the ratio of the maximum velocity to the average velocity can be
determined.   Because the average velocity enters the electrostatic
precipitation formula, the ratio of maximum velocity-to-average-velocity
will give some measure of the degradation of efficiency due to nonuniform
air flow.  Alternatively,  the ratio of the root-mean-square of the readings
to the arithmetic average can be calculated.  Both ratios would be 1. 00 for
perfectly uniform flow, but the maximum  velocity-to-average-velocity ratio
would be the larger of the two when the velocities are nonuniform.

      The frequency of occurrence of velocities falling into a series of
intervals can also be plotted, and thus a histogram showing the statistical
velocity distribution can be constructed as shown in Figure 5. 5.   This
curve and the data for the profiles and contour  plots were taken from a
particularly poor velocity distribution cited by  White in Industrial
Electrostatic Precipitation.4 The two peaks indicate extremely bad
distribution.  A good distribution should approximate a Gaussian or
normal distribution in the core of the gas  flow,  with a tendency to skew
somewhat toward zero because of the wall friction. The narrower the
spread of the distribution, the better the uniformity.  Statistically, the
spread is measured by the standard deviation,  the root-mean-square of the
sum of the deviations from the average.  The standard deviation of the
example shown is about 50% of the average velocity.  No references were
found giving examples of the standard deviation to be expected for good
distribution, but the Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute recommends 85% of
local velocities within ±25% of the mean,  and no single reading more than
±40% from the mean as an acceptable criteria.   This  set of conditions
corresponds to a standard deviation of about 23% of the average velocity.

      Note that it is impossible to achieve a completely uniform velocity
distribution in a practical duct system.  There  will be zero velocity
at the wall of the ducts  and there will be random variations due to
turbulence in the core of the flow.  A practical goal, then, must be to
achieve a nearly uniform gas flow using the best duct design procedures
in the present state-of-the-art plus field corrective measures as  required.
Present practice is to use models constructed of plastic or hardboard
from  1/4 to 1/6 scale of the full-size plant to determine a practical
design.  Field corrections are used as a last resort.
                                                SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                               Maximum * 14. 0 ft/ sec                .. __
                               Average* 7. 8 ft/ sec          }Ratio « 1.80
                               Root- mean-square » 8. 4 ft/ sec }Ratl° * 1- 08
25


^ 20

!
I
•S 15
rt
W
_c
too
e
1 10
0)
K



5




M*






-















) 2














































_ ^ '
f .



/
x
y











/

/
/
i
'
1
1
1




i
1
1
1
1

1
1
/
1

1





































8
. Hypothetical curve with
. good distribution
\
\
\
\
\
I
1



i
\

\
\
i
\






\
\

\
\

1









\


















^.
Sample histogram of
bad distribution

-


























l — I
b 12 1*4 '
                            ft/sec

Figure  5. 5.  Histogram Showing Statistical Velocity Distribution.
                                                                                       CO
                                                                                       -3

-------
                                -138-
      To achieve uniform flow in a duct according to ASME test procedures,
one should have at least ten diameters  of duct before and after any disturbance
such as the elbow,  expansion or contraction.   In practice, such conditions
cannot always be economically realized because of space limitations and the
high cost of ducts in the sizes involved. However, given a reasonable space,
it is possible to approach an acceptable quality of flow at the precipitator
inlet by the use of straighteners, splitters, vanes, and diffusion plates.

5.2  STRAIGHTENERS

      Partitions in a straight section of duct for the purpose  of eliminating
swirl are called straighteners.  They may be "egg crate" dividers or
nested tubes as shown below:
      A straightener will reduce the angle of a helical flow path to some
angle less than that defined by arc tan =
 length
spacing
The nonuniformity
in the velocity in the axial direction will not be reduced.  The scale of
turbulence, or eddy diameter, will be temporarily reduced to the same
size as the spacing of the straighteners, but because the Reynolds number
is usually well above critical,  the eddies will not die out, but will grow
until they again reach the order of magnitude of the full duct.  It is theo-
retically possible to make the spacing of straighteners small enough to
obtain a Reynolds number less than critical and to obtain laminar flow
through the straighteners, and to obtain nearly absolute uniformity.
Unfortunately, such spacing would only be about the size of soda straws
and the straightener would be expected to plug up with dust almost immedi-
ately.

      A recommended straightener, according to AMCA  Bulletin 210,
is an egg crate with a spacing of 7-1/2 to 15% of the diameter of a round
duct or the average side of a rectangular d.uct,  and with a length equal
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                -139-
to three times the spacing.  This reduces the swirl angle to arc tan
1/3 = 18-1/2°. An alternate straightener is a simple criss-cross at least
one and a half diameters long.  The loss in these straighteners is equal to
the loss in four plain duct diameters.  If it is necessary to reduce the
swirl angle to smaller values, the ratio of length to spacing must be
increased, and the resulting friction will be higher.

5.3  SPLITTERS

      A duct section that changes size or direction may be divided into
smaller ducts over the full length of the change by partitions called
splitters.  Splitters may be used in elbows where direction is changed,
or in transformations where velocity is changed.  Splitters add wall
friction,  but can reduce total friction by optimizing velocity pressure
losses.

      Losses in elbows depend in part on how sharp the bend is.  A
square, or mitered,  elbow will have a loss of 1. 25 times the velocity
pressure,  but an elbow of optimum configuration could have a loss of
only 0.11 to 0. 14 velocity pressure.  As shown in Figure 5. 6,  the optimum
configuration is an elbow with a  ratio of inside radius to outside radius
of about 0. 66 for a square duct,  or 0. 7 for a round duct.

      To design a splitter elbow, therefore,  it is only necessary to divide
the given elbow into segments all having a radius ratio of about 2/3.

5. 4  TRANSFORMATION SPLITTERS

      Splitters may also be used in a diverging duct transformation to
divide the flow into nearly equal parts and then distribute the flow to the
larger* section:

-------
                                 -140-
100
n
n

£
"8

S
o
09
09
O
10
                             Ratio   inside radius
                                   outside radius


              Figure 5. 6.  Elbow Loss  as a Function of Radius Ratio.
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                -141-
      The gas flow will not be uniform within each segment of the trans-
formation section,  but the volume through every segment can be made
equal to that in every other segment if the splitters are manufactured to
be field adjustable.

      A sharp angle in the transformation causes the gas to separate from
the walls of the duct,  introducing turbulence and nonuniform flow.  The
maximum angle of divergence for no separation is about 7° included angle.
Therefore,  splitters in a transformation should be selected to have 7° to
10° included angle between successive splitters.  For example,  a trans-
formation with 60° included angle could be split into  8 channels with
7-1/2° spread, or 6 channels with 10° spread:
      Note that a transformation in one direction is the simpler.
Transforming in two directions would require pyramidal splitters.

5.5  VANES

      Another kind of deflector for redirecting gas flow is the turning
vane.  Turning vanes are flat,  bent, or curved plates which are short
relative to the duct section in which they are installed,  as opposed to
splitters which extend the full length.  A plain flat plate vane used to
deflect the air stream is partly effective, but it tends to increase
turbulence as shown in the sketch:

-------
                                -142-
      The low pressure area behind the plate also tends to pull the gas
flow back toward its original path.

      Curved turning vanes in an elbow can be  quite effective if they are
spaced to give about a 6:1 aspect ratio  and a 2/3 radius ratio, and are
streamlined to give constant cross section through the turn.

      The streamlined turning vanes shown in Figure 5.7 will preserve the
flow pattern and will  have a loss of about 10% of the velocity pressure.  A set
of single thickness turning vanes will also preserve the  flow pattern,  but
will have about 35% velocity pressure loss  and may introduce some turbu-
lence because of the unequal cross sections between them.  Single thickness
vanes should have a straight extension downstream with length about twice
the spacing.  In practice, single thickness turning vanes are generally used
because of cost considerations.

      For rectangular elbows,  one parameter is the aspect ratio, or the
ratio of the depth of the elbow measured parallel to the axis of the bend
to the width of the elbow measured in the plane of the bend:
                     "Hard" Bend
                                                      w
"Easy" Bend
      It is  intuitively obvious from the sketches that a low aspect ratio
elbow is a  "hard" bend with high pressure loss which has very nonuniform
flow caused by inertial forces.  Any aspect ratio greater than unity will
make a fair elbow,  but aspect ratios from 4 to 6 are recommended.

      Turning vanes are also used in transformation elbows; that is,
elbows that change  cross section between inlet and outlet.  Although
the combination of elbow and transformation is relatively poor design
practice, severe space limitations may force it upon the designer.  If
a transformation elbow must be used,  then turning vanes are essential.
                                              SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                   -143-
Figure 5. 7.  Streamlined Turning Vane Elbow.

-------
                                 -144-
and they must be closely spaced to about the same spacing as the
precipitator plates.   They must also be followed by additional flow
rectification means such as diffusion plates.

5. 6  DIFFUSION PLATES

      Diffusion plates,  or  screens,  are simply perforated plates or wire
screens which improve the uniformity of air flow by a combination of
effects.  First,  they reduce the scale of turbulence from  the order of
magnitude of the duct to the order of magnitude of the holes.  Of course,
the kinetic energy that existed in the large scale eddies will reappear in
the small scale  eddies,  but the large differences  in velocity will be
reduced.  Second, there is a pressure  drop across the screen and a
reduction in area.  The  pressure drop  will partly reappear as a velocity
vector perpendicular to  the plate.  This vector added to the original
velocity vector will give a resultant velocity always more nearly
perpendicular to the plate:         w'
Thus,  it might be possible to design a diffuser plate to turn the gas
stream through a precise small angle.   However,  in practice, it is
usually simpler and less costly to use two or more diffusion screens in
series to achieve a fair degree of uniformity.

      Perforated plate  screens break the gas stream up into a multiplicity
of small jets with high  turbulent intensity and  small scale of turbulence.
These jets eventually coalesce downstream.  The turbulent  intensity
reaches a peak at 2 to 3 mesh lengths (center  to center of holes)  down-
stream and declines exponentially thereafter.  The scale of turbulence
is of the order of the hole size at the screen and increases until it
reaches the size of the  duct.  There is a critical parameter of 50%
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -145-
open area for diffusion screens.  When the percentage of open area is less
than 50%, the jets seem to be too far apart to coalesce uniformly and
the screen introduces nonuniformity.  When the percentage of open area is
between 50% and 85%, the jets appear to coalesce within 5 to 10 mesh
lengths (center to center of holes) with improvement in uniformity.6

      Screens may be used  in series to provide greater uniformity at
the cost of larger pressure drops.  Dryden and Schubauer7 developed
the following relationship for the  reduction in turbulent intensity:
      r  =  (14-k)-2  ,

where

      r  =  reduction factor

      k  =  pressure drop coefficient =  	^r-
                                       PVO/Z

      n  =  number of screens in series

    Ap   =  pressure drop

      p  =  density

      vo =  average velocity.

      All of the preceding ductwork design techniques are available to
the designer.   None of the criteria are rigid, so there is considerable
freedom in design.  It is the designer's choice as to whether to use
splitters, turning vanes, or screens to control the air distribution.
On the inlet side  of a precipitator,  there may be a heavy dust loading
of particle sizes  large enough to settle out.  Horizontal  splitters or
vanes form convenient shelves for  the deposition of disastrous quantities
of dust.  Therefore,  horizontal splitters and vanes are generally used
only when the  velocity is higher than the erosion velocity of deposited
dust. Dust will collect by impaction on the diffusion screens,  so some
means of cleaning then is required, such as regular rapping or soot
blowing.

-------
                                 -146-
      The pressure drop through a screen at large Reynolds numbers
depends on the coefficient of contraction of the jets formed by the gas
flow through the openings:
     Cc =  coefficient of contraction

      s  =  solidity ratio

(1 - s) 100 = percent open area.

      The coefficient of contraction depends on whether the holes are
sharp edged, or round edged, whether the screen is made of non-
coplanar bars, on the thickness of the plate, and on the accuracy of
manufacture.  The best procedure is to measure the pressure drop
for the  actual screen to be used.  Alternatively,  use values of the
coefficient of contraction as  reported in the literature:

      For sharp edges, Cc is about 0.62.
      For round edges, Cc equals unity.
      For thick plates (more than 2-1/2 times hole diameter), Cc is unity.

Other values lie between 0. 6 and 1. 0.

      The design criteria for diffusion screens are summarized below:

      (1)  Open percent area should be between 50% and 65%.
      (2)  Screens in  series must not be closer than 5  to 10 mesh lengths
apart.
      (3)  Hole size must be  large enough to be unlikely to become  plugged
with dust, but small enough to reduce the scale of turbulence as much as
possible. Sizes from 1 to 2  inches in diameter are  reported.
      (4)  Screens should be  oriented to refract the gas stream toward
the desired direction.

5.7  MODELLING

      Because of the  difficulties in the design of ducts for large size
precipitation installations, the use of models  for air flow studies is
                                             SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -147-
almost universally practiced.  The models usually consist of sheet acrylic
plastic or pressed hardwood constructed to be geometrically similar to the
full scale system.  The models are used to obtain a visual pattern of the
gas flow by the injection of smoke streamers or by the placement of yarn
tufts in the air stream.  Quantitative measurements are made with pitot
tube traverses or thermoanemometers.  A visual evaluation of the particulate
drop-out characteristics of the system can be made by the introduction of
dust into the gas stream.  An evaluation of the erosion of deposited dust can
be made by placing a layer of ground cork on the bottom of the duct before
starting the blower.

      Information from model studies can be presented in the form of
photographs of smoke streamers,  yarn tuft deflections,  and cork erosion
patterns.  Data on nonuniformity of gas flow can be presented in the form
of plots  of velocity profiles or velocity contour diagrams.

      Modelling has been practiced for many years in designing air flow
systems.  Early work was done  at scales of 1/4 or 3/8 size with the  Reynolds
number  held substantially constant.  Because  of the increasing size of modern
installations, the trend has been toward the use of models constructed to
1/16 scale.  Whereas models can give a considerable amount of valuable
information on velocity distribution, dust fallout patterns,  and static pressure
loss,  they do not necessarily accurately reflect the actual velocity distribution
in a full size unit,  and a small scale model may be less  accurate than a larger
scale model.  The results of models in part depend on such factors as the
fidelity of the model and the skill of the investigator.

      In the theory of modelling fluid systems, certain dimensionless
parameters should be made equal in the full size system and in the model.
There are as many dimensionless numbers as there are fundamental
dimensions in the physical system.  Therefore,  if some of the physical
parameters are arbitrarily chosen or fixed by the nature of the fluid,  it
becomes impossible to hold all the dimensionless numbers constant.   The
dimensionless numbers in fluid flow depend on the ratio between the
important physical parameters as follows:

      (1) Inertial force  =   pvL   =  Reynolds Number
          Viscous force
      (2)  Inertial force =   _vf_   =  (Froude's Number)
          Gravity force     Lg

-------
                                 -148-
      (3)   Inertial force    .   _v^_  .  (^c^g Number)2
          Pressure force        vc2

      (4)  Acceleration force   =  _Ag__  (Euler,8 Number)2
            Tnertial force          2 va

      Note that within the electric field of the precipitator an "electrical"
Froude's Number can be defined:8

      Inertial force  _     PV
        Body force      6?TNa/iwL


Symbols in the above are as follows,  in consistent units;

      p  = density

      v  = velocity

      L = linear characteristic dimension

      V-  = viscosity

      g  = gravity

     VG  = velocity of sound in the fluid

      N = number of dust particles per unit volume

      a  - radius of dust particles

      w  = migration velocity

    Ap  = pressure gradient.

      In equipment the size of industrial electrostatic precipitators, the
flow nearly always has a high Reynolds number and  is in the turbulent
regime.  Theoretically, for testing in a model, the  Reynolds number in the
model should be exactly the same as in the full scale unit.  Unfortunately,
this is usually impractical.  For example, to make  a -—%•  scale model of
                                                     16
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -149-
a system having air at 300°F in a duct with a characteristic dimension of
16 feet,  and using room air for the model fluid, the Reynolds number for the
system must be equated to the Reynolds number for the model:
PQ (
460 + 70 v
460 + 300 r
fi if"
M0 (1.33)
      R   =    po Vo Lo
       e
      Note that the density and viscosity at 70°F have been replaced by a
temperature correction factor times the values.

Simplify

      v   =        530 xv.       _    v,
       0     760  + 1.33 x 16    '  30.515

Solve:

      vt  =   30. 5 v0 .

      Therefore,  to maintain the Reynolds number constant,  the velocity
in the model should be 30. 5 times as high as in the system.  If the
system were to be run at 10 ft/sec, then 305 ft/sec would be required in
the model, or about 27% of the speed of sound.  Thus,  the model would
have a Mach number of 0. 27 where the system would have Mach number
about a tenth as much  and  the model would not be dynamically similar.
Similarly, if the  actual system velocity were 50 ft/sec, the model flow
would be supersonic.  If the  scale ratio were to be 1/4 instead of 1/16,  the
situation would be better by a factor of 4, even if still theoretically incor-
rect.

      Because  the main problem in ductwork design for electrostatic
precipitators is to achieve uniform gas distribution,  unrealistically
high velocities in the model are not recommended.  Also, the actual
velocity distribution from the upstream equipment cannot be fully known
or duplicated because  of the  effects of temperature and density variations
and of the effects of the presence of dust.  Dust changes  the density and
viscosity  of the gas slightly; dust tends to deposit on the walls, splitters,
and vanes by settling or impaction and  changes the roughness parameter
or even the size and shape of the ductwork.  The  only system that perfectly
models  a  given system is the system itself.   This is the  one reason why

-------
                                 -150-
field engineering may be required to rectify the gas flow distribution if the
system was modelled.

      This is not to say that models should not,  or need not, be used.  In
fact, models are essential for difficult duct configurations.  A more im-
portant reason to conduct model studies is to investigate the gas flow pattern
expected in the commercial  installation.   Poor gas flow conditions may
cause severe dust reentrainment that can result in the precipitator perw
formance falling far short of design expectations.

      The calculation  of the pressure losses of a complicated system with
nonuniform gas flow may be impossible.   A model will give a conservative
estimate of the pressure loss provided the roughness parameter and the
Reynolds number are  properly duplicated.  Note on Figure 5.1, which plots
friction against Reynolds number for various roughness numbers, that in
the "wholly rough zone", the friction is essentially constant.  Therefore, the
friction will be correct  if the Reynolds number is high enough, even though
it is not correct for theoretical similarity.

      In those cases where severe space  limitations force the designer
to violate all the criteria for good air flow,  it would be highly desirable
to use a model to make the air flow distribution as  good as possible under
the circumstances.  Note, however,  that the scale  of turbulence in any
duct is  of the order of magnitude of the scale of the duct, so that the size
of eddies in the model will be much smaller than the size of eddies in the
full size system.  It can be expected,  and it has been shown,8 that the
gas flow distribution in the full size system will be worse than in the model,
and the smaller the scale of the  model, the greater the deviation.

      In the cited reference, an air flow distribution with the ratio of
maximum velocity to average velocity of about 1. 20 was obtained in the
model,  but the full scale unit had the maximum velocity about 1.40 times
the average.  Experience built up over a  long period of time is required
before one would have any real confidence in scaling up from models having
a very small scale factor such as  *  to 1 and smaller. An example of

successful modelling with this scale factor is reported by Burton et. al. 9

      In general, .the recommended plan would be to design good duct work
with field adjustable vanes and splitters whenever possible.  When poor
duct work is required  because of space limitations, a model study is abso-
lutely essential, with  a safety factor included as determined by experience.
Careful field adjustments by competent people will then provide a reasonable
probability of acceptable operation.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -151-
                                CHAPTER 5
                             BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.     ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, American Society of Heating,
      Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers,  Inc. (1967).

2.     Fan Engineering, Sixth Edition (1961) Buffalo Forge Company.

3.     Remmers,  Karl and Bingel, Rolf, "The Importance of Gas
      Distribution in Electrostatic Precipitators, " Staub 19,  422
      (Dec.  1959).

4.     White, H. J.,  Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation, Addison-Wesley
      Publ.  Co., Reading,  Massachusetts (1963).

5.     A MCA Bulletin 210,  "Standard Test Code for Air Moving Devices, "
      Air Moving and Conditioning Association, Detroit,  Michigan (1960).

6.     Baines, W.  D. and  Peterson,  E. G., "An Investigation of Flow
      Through Screens, " ASME Trans. (July 1961).

7.     Dryden and Schubauer, "The Use of Damping Screens for the
      Reduction of Turbulence," J.  of Aero. Science 14,  No. 4 (1947).

8.     Qpfell, J. B.  and Sproull,  W. T.,  "Limitations of  Model Studies
      in Predicting Gas Velocity Distribution in Cottrell Precipitators, "
      I and EC Proc. Des.  and Dev.  4, No. 2 (April 1965).

9.     Burton, C. L.,  et al., "Application of Model Studies to Industrial
      Gas Flow Systems, "Am.  Soc. Mech. Engrs. Ann.  Mtg.,
      Atlantic City,  New Jersey, Nov.-Dec. 1959, Paper 59-A-280,
      9P (1959).

-------
                                    -152-
                                CHAPTER 6
                     RAPPING AND REENTRAINMENT
 6.1  RAPPING

       After collection of the dust on the collection electrode, it must be
 removed from the system.   This is accomplished by washing or flushing the
 plates in the case of a wet collection electrode, or by impacting or rapping
 in the case of a  dry collection system.

       The successful removal of dust from a precipitator by rapping depends
 upon the formation of a coherent dust so that on removal, it falls in sheets
 and large agglomerates into the hoppers.  The adhesive and cohesive forces
 acting on the dust layer are electrical,  mechanical,  and molecular in nature,
 and influence the difficulty  of dislodging the dust from the electrode, as well
 as reentrainment of the dust during the rapping process.

       Within the collected dust layer, the forces acting on the particles are
 the cohesive forces due to adsorbed gases on-the  surface, mechanical forces
 due to interlocking of the particles and interparticle friction,  Van der Waal's
 forces due to proximity of adjacent particles,  and electrical forces.

       One component of the electrical force is generated by the ion current
 flow to the dust  layer.  The magnitude of the net electrical  force is  given by
 Lowe and Lucas1 as:

                       Pel.«  d2 f kiEjp -  Ef]
                                          32
 where

       P j   =  electrical adhesive force,
         d   =  particle diameter,
         E   =  electrical field "strength,
         j    =  current density,
        p    =  specific electrical resistance,
        kj    =  constant,
  kjEd jp    =  proportion of Coulomb force due to ion current, and
      d2E2   =  share of Coulomb repelling force caused by influence
       32      effects.
iRefer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -153-
      If the dust resistivity is high,  as in the case of fly ash, cement dust,
etc.,  the net force will tend to cause the dust layer to adhere more tena-
ciously to the collection electrode,  thereby increasing the rapping intensity
required  to dislodge it.  Highly conductive dust,  such as  carbon black,  tends
to reduce the net electrical force.

      A second component of the electrical retentive force is electrostatic
in nature.  If the particles are collected under the influence of an electric
field as is the  case here, the dipole moments of the individual particles
will tend  to align in such a manner  that adjacent particles will be attracted
by a coulombic force.

      Fundamental studies of the adhesive forces  on dust particles have been
made byDavies, Penney,3 and others.  In terms  of practical precipitator
operation, the  forces will vary with the type, size, and condition  of the dust,
as well as its electrical properties.

      Temperature of the gas  and gas composition also influence the adhesive
forces.  When  operating at temperatures below the dew point,  the dust layer
can become moist  and extremely difficult to  dislodge.

      In practical precipitators, rapping is  usually required on both the
collection and  discharge electrodes,  although the  problems of reentrainment
are of no consequence in the case of the discharge electrode, due to the small
quantities of dust involved.  The considerations for dust removal are the
same as those  for  the collecting electrode,  since  deposits can form on the
discharge wire.  However,  the current density through the  dust layer is
larger than that through the dust layer on the collecting electrode by the
ratio of the collecting surface area to the area of  the discharge wire.  Con-
sequently, the  electrical forces would tend to hold the dust  more tenaciously
to the discharge electrode than to the collection plate.  These deposits can
reach the point of serious impairment to precipitator efficiency if the dis-
charge electrode rapping is inadequate.

      Rapping  systems for both collection and discharge electrodes can be
of the impact or vibrator type. Impact rappers are normally actuated pneu-
matically, electrically,  or by gravity, and can vary from a single blow to
a rapid succession of impacts. The rapping cycle can be varied over a
wide range  depending upon the requirements of the precipitator.  Vibrator
types  are generally motor-driven vibrators that shake the electrode sup-
port structure, and  are often used on the discharge electrode in conjunction

-------
                                    -154-
with an impact rapper on the collection plate.

      The principal consideration in any  rapping system is the magnitude of
the forces required to dislodge the dust without mechanical damage to the
electrodes or support structure, or  causing excessive reentrainment.  It is
a general rule to rap just hard enough to dislodge the dust and keep the col-
lected dust layer at an acceptable thickness.   It is impractical to maintain
the collecting electrode  completely clean, since successful rapping is accom-
plished by removal of the dust in clumps or sheets.  Dust thicknesses of \ to
1 inch prior  to dislodging are usual.  Figure  6.1 shows the results of several
tests reported by the British Central Electricity Generating Board relating
the acceleration required to dislodge dusts remaining on the collection elec-
trode to a given thickness.

      Some investigations have been made of the magnitude of the rapping
blow required to achieve the  desired rapping efficiency.  Brandt and Heinrich
attribute the dust removal from the electrodes to the peak value of accelera-
tion normal to the  plane of the surface.  Sproull5 reports that the determining
factor in dust removal is the acceleration imparted to the electrodes and
that it varies with  type of dust, whether the electrode is rapped in the plane
of the electrode (shear)  or perpendicular to the plane (normal).  Figures
6. 2 and 6. 3 show the accelerations required  for shear and normal rapping
for several dusts and various temperatures.   As shown on the curves,  accel-
eration of the order of lOOg's may be required for 90% removal of the col-
lecting electrode dust for rapping normal to the plate,  and 200g's for rapping
in the plane of the  electrode for diff icult-to-remove dust.  For fly ash and
easier-to-remove dusts,  the accelerations required are considerably less	
of the order  of 10-30 g1 s.

      The efficiency of rapping,  measured in terms of residual dust, is in
general improved if the  power is removed during the rap as indicated in
Figure 6. 2.  This  is due to the removal of the corona current and the re-
duction of the force holding the dust layer to  the plate.  Since this force
is dependent on resistivity,  its magnitude will vary for different types
of dust and the requirement for power-off rapping will depend on the dust
characteristics.  Power-off rapping is usually resorted to in the event
normal rapping practice is inadequate. It is to be recognized that the por-
tion of the precipitator that is in operation during rapping will not be col-
lecting material and stack puffs may result.
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                    -155-




4

OU
f-,
9
"53
a
•iH
^ 1
•!-< «J
§
M
of
CO
S
o
2 2
-4-J
M
Q

1






i
o
0 o Single Measurement
O Average of Five
Measurements

\
0 \ 0 95% certain that the
\+^J average dust thick-
L ness for a given
\ acceleration lies
\ O below this
0 \ line.
o o \
o x
0 \
\
o O O ^ ^ n
X\°

8 ^ -a.
°° °o ° ""
o
o O
o 0
o
o o ^
w wo
L L L
10 20 30 4
      Acceleration in Vertical Direction,
               Units of g
Figure 6.1.  Acceleration to Remove Dust Down to
             a Given Remaining Thickness for Fly
             Ash in British Installations.

-------
                                    -156-
    100
        0         20        40        60        80        100       120       140
        Max Shear Acceleration of Collecting Electrode Plate Produced by Shear Rap ("g")
Figure 6. 2.
Shear (parallel) rapping efficiency for various precipitated dust layers
having about 0. 2 gram of dust per square inch,  as a function of maxi-
mum acceleration in multiples of "g. "  Curve 1, fly ash, 70 to 300°F,
power off.   Curve 2, fly ash,  300°F, power on.  Curve 3, fly  ash,
200°F,  power on.  Curve 4,  cement kiln feed, 70°F,  power off.
Curve 5, same as 4, except at 300°F.  Curve 6,  same as 4 and 5,
except at 200°F. Curve 7, cement dust, 300°F,  power off.  Curve 8,
same as 7,  except at 200°F.  Curve 9, cement kiln feed,  200 or 300°F,
power on.  Curve 10,  cement dust, 300°F, power on.  Curve 11, same
as 10,  except at 200°F. Curve 12,  fly ash, 70°F, power on.  Curve 13,
cement  kiln feed, 70°F, power on.
                                                       SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -157-
100
   0         20        40       60         80        100       120       140
 Max Normal Acceleration of Collecting Electrode Plate Produced by Normal Rap ("g")

 Figure 6.3.  Normal (perpendicular) rapping efficiency for various precipitated
              dust layers having about 0. 2 gram of dust per square inch,  as a
              function of maximum acceleration in multiples of "g."  Curve 1,
              fly ash, 200 or 300°F,  power off. Curve 2, fly ash,  70°F, power
              off;  also 200 or 300°F,  power on.  Curve 3,  fly ash,  70°F,  power
              on.  Curve 4,  cement kiln feed, 300°F, power off.  Curve 5,
              cement dust, 300°F, power  off.  Curve 6, same as 5, except
              power on.  Curve 7, cement kiln feed, 300°F, power on.  Curve
              8,  cement  dust, 200°F,  power off.  Curve 9, same as 8,  except
              power on.  Curve 10, cement kiln feed, 200°F, power off.  Curve
              11, same as 10, except  at 70°F.  Curve  12, cement kiln feed,
              200°F, power on.  Curve 13, cement kiln feed, 70°F, power on.

-------
                                   -158-
      One problem encountered in dry dust removal is reentrainment of the
dust during rapping.  Because of the height of the plates is often 30 ft or
more, it is apparent that some dust will be reentrained as it falls .through
the passage to the hoppers.  This gives rise to a rapping "puff, " which is
often visible in the plume during the rap. To minimize this effect,  rapping
is done in stages with only a portion of the plates rapped  at one time. Var-
ious collecting electrode shapes are also used in an effort to shield the fal-
ling dust from the gas stream,  thereby minimizing reentrainment.

      There are many variations possible in rapping practice depending on
the particular installation and process.   If parallel units  are used, the gas
flow can be directed by dampers  during rapping so  that there is %no gas flow
through the unit.   Where the dust load is intermittent,  as in the case of a
basic oxygen furnace,  it is possible to eliminate rapping  of the plates.  Fol-
lowing the  oxygen blow,  when the dust load is  reduced,  the draft fan  can be
shut off and the plates rapped.

      The accelerations required to maintain a given rapping efficiency are
those at the plate  itself and the design of the rapping system should include
consideration of the rigidity of the supporting members and the electrode,
and their ability to transmit the impact to all areas  of the electrode.  Recent
studies of operating precipitators in Europe have shown that accelerations
measured on the  collection electrode  are as low as 5 g's, whereas minor
changes in the method of applying the blow could yield accelerations  of 30-
50 g's.  The latter range appears adequate for most fly ash precipitators.

      Although it has been recognized that rapping is more than just  a
minor adjunct to  precipitator operation,  there is a  conspicuous lack  of
experimental .data that defines the conditions required to  effectively re-
move the types of dusts  encountered.  There are reports  of inability to
dislodge high resistivity dust by rapping, and there is no  experimental ver-
ification of the rapping requirements  as a function of dust resistivity.  Also,
there should be some measure of the  reentrainment tendency for various
dusts as related to particle size,  specific gravity,  particle configuration,
and quality of gas flow.
6.2  REENTRAINMENT

                     \
      Particles on a dust surface at the boundary of a gas stream are trans-
ported by suspension,  by saltation (repeated rebounding), or by "creep. "
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -159-
A compact layer of settled dust will not move until the least secure surface
particle is dislodged by the drag force of the gas velocity, by impaction by
another particle, or by the explosive  impact of electric  sparkover, which
also results in momentary disruption of power. When this particle again
strikes the  surface of the  dust, it dislodges more particles and initiates  a
cascade of saltating particles.  If an impacted particle is not ejected into the
gas stream, it may be displaced a small  distance downstream which is the
motion described by Bagnold6 for dust held by gravitational forces.  If the
force due to gravity is replaced by  the electrical force,  the equation can be
written as:

                      U*  = kt Sp - S a a
                                S

where

      U*    =  threshold drag velocity,
       kx    =  experimental coefficient,
       Sp'"  =  density of particle,
       S    =  density of gas,
       a    -  acceleration on deposit (electrical force divided by mass), and
       a    =  particle size.

      Bagnold found the coefficient  Mk1" to be constant for particles larger
than 200 microns.  Chepil7 obtained the curve shown in Figure 6. 4 for thres-
hold drag velocity versus  particle size.   Note that the minimum drag velo-
city occurs around 60-100 microns and that the threshold is very high  for
very small  particles such as might be found in electrostatic precipitator in-
stallations.

      The initiation of erosion is strongly related to the adhesion of the dust
layer. Adhesion depends  in part on the history of the accumulation of  the
dust.  If the dust layer accumulates essentially one particle at a time with
sufficient freedom of motion and sufficient time for each particle to orient
itself to the randomly situated positive and negatively charged areas on the
dust layer and  on itself, then  the dust layer will have an adhesive strength
an order of magnitude higher than the same dust piled in bulk.8  The require-
ment for the formation of  a layer thus held together by Coulomb forces is
met by electrostatic precipitation and by  sedimentation in low velocity zones
in the  ductwork.  On  the collection  plate,  however,  additional forces due to

-------
-i
H


PI
                                                                                              OS
                                                                                              o
10
100          200

     Particle Size,
                                                            300
400
500
600   700  800  900  1000

   (Square Root Scale)
      Figure 6.4.  Threshold Shear Velocity Vs. Particle Size.

-------
                                   -161-
the ion current act on the dust layer.  Loosely piled dust that results from
rapping of plates, electrodes or diffusion screens does not meet the require-
ments for an adhesive layer, so a much lower velocity will erode such piles
in the hoppers.

      With particles larger than 100 microns,  initiation of erosion can occur
when the drag on one particle is enough to start a saltation cascade.  A ran-
dom gust of turbulence can initiate a cascade,  so it is apparent that a uniform
gas velocity with the least amount of turbulent intensity is highly desirable.
With particles smaller than 100 microns,  erosion will be initiated when the
velocity exerts enough drag force on the edge of a discontinuity.  Such dis-
continuities will  exist as the results of slabs of dust falling off the plates
through the action of rapping and gravity.  As the slabs break up, agglom-
erates larger than 100 microns may occur, which can permit saltation to
begin.

      Erosion may also be  initiated by the impact of large particles on the
collected dust layer.  The large particles  have greater electrical migra-
tion velocities and therefore impact the deposit with greater momentum.
The impact energy may be  sufficient to initiate erosion.

      Erosion can occur at any place that dust accumulates.  Dust accumula-
tion in the inlet ductwork does not necessarily result in carryover of dust
from the precipitator,  but it does result in alteration  of the gas flow pattern,
usually in the direction of greater nonuniformity of velocity and lower col-
lection  efficiency.  Therefore,  it is desirable to have a velocity in the duct-
work high enough to prevent settling or high enough to erode away dust
deposits.  Dust accumulation in the hoppers is a required function of pre-
cipitators, so gas velocity  in the hopper area must be below some critical
velocity for loose unconsolidated dust.  It  is also important to prevent in-
leaks through the collection hopper discharge gates because the erosion
velocity in this case is equal to the terminal settling velocity of the parti-
cles. Air in-leak through conveyors should be less than the critical velo-
city for loosely piled dust.

      Erosion in the precipitator itself is important because it results in
a direct loss of collected dust,  and a direct reduction in collection efficien-
cy.  Sharp edges on the dust layer always  exist because of rapping and grav-
ity, and erosion  can always occur if the local velocity is high enough.  Con-
trol of uniformity of velocity and of the intensity of turbulence can hardly be
overemphasized.

-------
                                   -162-
      When the dust slab falls off the collection plate, some of the slab
breaks up,  and the dust becomes reentrained.  It is a usual practice to limit
the local gas velocity in the area of the falling dust by the use of pockets in
the plate or baffles on the plate, perpendicular to the gas flow.

      In addition to erosion due to wind velocity, there is some reentrain-
ment of particles in a precipitator which can be called "electrostatic re-
entrainment".  Particles which have a low resistivity can discharge their
acquired electrical charge when they reach the collector plate. With no
electrical force holding the particle to the plate, the particle may simply
fall off, or  be eroded by the wind or saltating particles.  The particles may
also acquire an induced positive charge and migrate  toward the negative
discharge wire.  Reeritrainment can also occur during sparking when a
precipitator section is momentarily out of service.

      The opposite problem to reentrainment can exist in some cases
where the adhesion of the dust is extremely high. The dust cakes on the
collector plates or the corona wires and even severe rapping may not
dislodge all the dust.

      Table 6.1 summarizes the different erosion situations that  can exist
in a system using electrostatic precipitation.

      Note  that there are many critical velocities for erosion:

      (1)  Threshold velocity for particles greater than 100 microns.
      (2)  Threshold velocity for sharp edged discontinuity on a compact
          dust layer.
      (3)  Threshold velocity for undisturbed compact dust layer.
      (4)  Threshold velocity for mechanically compacted dust.
      (5)  Threshold velocity for loose dust.

      Furthermore, each of the above velocities will be different for every
possible particle size distribution, as well as for different adhesion strengths
induced by  chemical, mechanical, and thermal conditions.  Thus, no simple
analytical method has been developed to predict erosion and reentrainment.

      The cascade effect of saltating particles cannot increase without limit.
Eventually,  the  number of particles ejected by impaction will equal the num-
ber of particles that become reembedded in the dust  layer and do not bounce
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -163-
                                Table 6.1
                            Erosion Situations
         Location                      Adhesion
Precipitated dust on corona wires         High
Precipitated dust on collector plates       High
Settled dust in ductwork                  High
Dislodged dust in hoppers                 Low
Dislodged dust in ductwork                Low
Dust in conveyors and air locks           Low
             Desired Velocity

           More than critical
           for compact dust

           Less than critical
           for compact dust

           Greater than critical
           for compact dust

           Less than critical
           for loose dust

           Greater than critical
           for loose dust

           Less than critical
           for loose dust
Falling dislodged dust
Zero
Minimum practical

-------
                                   -164-
out again.  The rate of erosion will therefore eventually reach a saturation
value.  The saturation point will be reached in a precipitator at some point
downstream from the  inlet.  At the inlet, the  erosion rate is necessarily
zero, because there is no material collected at zero length.

      Eroded material from one area of the collector will normally be
recaptured downstream.   The last section of the precipitator has no down-
stream collector, so that a constant erosion rate will result in a net
loss of dust and a reduction in efficiency of collection.   Robinson9 has
derived a modification of the usual efficiency  equation
      TJ  = 1 - exp (- — w)
                     vg
to include the effect of erosion
         =  1- (l-j~)  exp[-(l-a)AXW.-1l_
where
      a  =  mass of dust eroded per unit mass precipitated
           for normal dust,

      j3  =  mass of dust eroded per unit mass precipitated
           for "problem" dust (i.e., low resistivity dust that
           is repeatedly precipitated and reentrained with no
           change in concentration in the length of the pre-
           cipitator),

      ^  =  concentration uniformity factor,  the ratio of the
           dust concentration near the  wall to the average
           dust concentration over the  cross section between
           precipitator plates,

      A  =  collection area,

     v-  =  volume gas flow rate,  and
      O

      w  =  migration velocity.

      When X = 1 for uniform distribution and  a  - 0,  and  j3 = 0, the
modified equation reduces to the usual form.  If j8 = 0,  X = 0;  and
a  - 0, the equation  reduces to an exponential form which could be
expressed  using an equivalent migration velocity.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH^ INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -165-
                               CHAPTER 6
                             BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.  Lowe, H. J. and Lucas, D.  H.,  "The Physics of Electrostatic
   Precipitation, " Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 24, No. 2, pp 40-47 (1953).

2.  Davies,C. N.,  Aerosol Science,Academic Press, London-New York
   (1966).

3.  Penney, G. W. and Klingler, E. H., "Contact Potentials and the
   Adhesion of Dust, " Communications and Electronics (July 1962).

4.  Heinrich, D.  O.,  "The Cleaning of Collection Electrodes in
   Electrostatic Precipitators,  " Staub 22, No. 9,  pp 360-364 (1962).

5.  Sproull, W.  T., "Fundamentals of Electrode Rapping in Industrial
   Electrical Precipitators," JAPCA 15, No. 2, pp 50-55 (Feb. 1965).

6.  Bagnold, R.  A., The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes,
   Wm. Morrow and Co.,  New York City, pp 322-334 (1943).

7.  Chepil, W.  S., 'Dynamics of Wind Erosion:  II - Initiation of Soil
   Movement, " Soil Science 60. pp 397-441 (1945).

8.  Niedra,  J. M. and Penney,  G. W.,  "Orientation and Adhesion of
   Particles,"  IEEE Trans.  IECI 12, No. 2, p 46 (1965).

9.  Robinson,  Myron,  "A Modified Deutsch Efficiency Equation for
   Electrostatic Precipitation, " Atmospheric Environment,  Pergamon
   Press I, pp 193-204 (1967).

-------
                                 -166-
                              CHAPTER 7
                   RESISTIVITY AND CONDITIONING
      Resistivity of the collected particulate layer has a dominant influence
on the operation of electrostatic precipitators.  If the resistivity is greater
than about 2 x 10l°  ohm-cm, the electric field in the dust layer resulting
from normal current densities will exceed the breakdown strength in local-
ized areas,  and excessive sparking and back corona may occur.  Conse-
quently,  the high tension voltage and resulting corona current must be
reduced,  adversely affecting precipitator performance.  If the resistivity
is less than about 107 ohm-cm,  the electrical force holding the dust deposit
will be low, and excessive reentrainment can occur for certain types of
dust.

      There are two conduction mechanisms which determine the resistiv-
ity of the collected dust layer in an electrostatic precipitator.  These
mechanisms are termed volume conduction, which is related to the bulk
composition of the material,, and surface conduction,  which depends on an
adsorbed film on the particle surface and which is related to the composi-
tion of the gas and dust surface.

7. 1 VOLUME CONDUCTION

      In  volume conduction,  electric charge is  transferred through the bulk
material that comprises the collected dust layer.  In most materials of
interest  in electrostatic precipitator applications, volume conduction occurs
by means of electron carriers within the materials and is dependent upon
the thermal excitation of the electrons in the molecular structure of the
materials.  It has been shown that for  most industrial dusts and fumes,
the relationship of volume conductivity and volume resistivity to tempera-
ture may be approximated by

                                           E
                              p   =
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -167-


where

      p  = resistivity,
      C  = constant,
      k  = Boltzmann's constant,
      T  = temperature, and
     E   = Activation energy.
      cl

      White1 has shown that resistivities of dusts as measured in the labora-
tory follow the theoretical relationship between volume conduction and acti-
vation energies above about 250°F.  Figure 7. 1 shows the experimental re-
lationship between resistivity and the factor _L_ for a variety of types of
                                           kT
materials.  Figure 7. 2 shows the quantitative relationship between resisti-
vity and  electron activation energies.

      The influence of temperature on resistivity of collected dusts  is shown
in Figure 7.3.  In the absence of moisture, the resistivity would continue to
increase with decreasing temperatures due to the decreased electron excita-
tion.  Conversely,  increases in temperature increase the thermal electron
excitation resulting in decreased resistivity.

      This decrease  in resistivity at elevated temperatures is significant
in many  electrostatic precipitator applications which  operate in the tempera-
ture range in which volume conduction is predominant.

7. 2  SURFACE CONDUCTION

      At gas temperatures below 300-400°F,  surface  conduction becomes
the increasingly important mode provided ample moisture and other con-
ditioning materials are present in the gas.  Surface conduction depends on
the presence of a conductive film of adsorbed material on the surface of the
particulate which provides for transfer of the electric charge along the sur-
face.   If ample moisture is present in the flue  gas, it will be adsorbed on
the surface  of the particles following the basic laws of adsorption.  It has
been calculated that the existence of a film 5  to 10 molecules thick on the
*Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.

-------
                    -168-
    lO1
        1.3 1.4  1.5   1.6   1.7   l.BxlO13
Figure 7.1  Plots of Resistivity Vs. 1/kT.
                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                       -169-
Resistivity, ohm- cm
J.U ~
10"
10io
109
10s
io7
ioe
m5
\* Talc
A1203 \
CaO\
MgO\
Leached fly ash >?
Si02\
    0.1  0.2    0.3    0.4  0.5    0.6    0.7

                Energy, electron-volts

Figure 7. 2  Experimental Values of Electron
            Activation Energy. (Reference 1)

-------
                                  -170-
   10
     15
   10
     14
   10
     13
s  10*
u
E
   to
I
00
     11
09
0)
   io
   10"
     10
   10"
                                            Reagent Grade
                                                 '  CaO
            Cement Kiln
                Dust
                     i
                                 \
      100
200      300         400       500
            Temperature, °F
600
700
       "Figure 7.3  Resistivity of Bone-Dry Dusts at Elevated Temperatures.
                                               SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -171-
surface is sufficient to explain the observed decrease in apparent resistivity
of collected layers of particulate with increased moisture content.  The
effect of adsorbed moisture on resistivity is illustrated in Figure 7.4.  If
moisture is present in the gas,  the resistivity departs from the bone dry
resistivity curve at temperatures where significant adsorption occurs.

      In processes where sufficient moisture is present in the gas,  either
from the process itself or as a result of evaporative water cooling,  the
resistivity of the dust is usually sufficiently low to be readily accommodated
by electrostatic precipitators.

      Many processes that  emit dust do not have sufficient moisture in the
flue gas for adequate conditioning in the absence of other conditioning agents.
If such  substances are present, however, as they are in many combustion
processes,  they may interact to alter the surface conduction properties and
reduce  the resistivities beyond the values indicated by the moisture content
alone.

      Because  of the dominant role of moisture in the conditioning process,
it is termed the primary conditioning agent.  Other materials, either
naturally occurring or added to the flue gas, are termed secondary condi-
tioning  agents.
7. 3  MECHANISMS OF SURFACE CONDITIONING

      The role of secondary conditioning agents has received considerable
study to determine how naturally occurring constituents of the gases, as
well as chemical additions to the gases,  act to alter the dust resistivity.
The extent of the use of electrostatic precipitators  in the collection of fly
ash from low sulfur coals has resulted in more work on the resistivity of
fly ash than on any other type of dust.

      Research carried out by Chittum and others2  in the early 1940's on
the fundamentals of conditioning led to the advancement of  a theory of con-
ditioning by alteration of the moisture adsorption properties of dust sur-
faces.  Chittum proposed that an intermediate chemical adsorption film,
which was strongly bound to the particle  and which  in turn  strongly adsorbed
water,  would be an effective conditioner. For example, he postulated and
later showed qualitatively, that a weak basic particle such as ZnO would

-------
                        -172-
10"
                         Temperature,  °F
Figure 7.4  Effect of Humidity on Particle Resistivity.
                                          SOUTHERN
                                                        INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -173-
exhibit improved adsorption capacity with prior additions of HC1 or H2SO4.
Similarly,  weak acidic particles such as A12O3,  when exposed to ammonia,
showed improved water adsorption characteristics.

      In fly ash precipitators, the influence of sulfur content of the fuel has
been recognized as a highly significant factor in precipitator performance.
The sulfur appears in the flue gas principally as SO2.  However, approxi-
mately 1 to 2% of the sulfur is oxidized to SO3, and it is sulfur in this form
that is active in the conditioning process.  The quantity of SO3 present de-
pends upon the sulfur content of the fuel, the operating conditions in the
boiler, and the composition of the fly ash.

      At the temperatures that exist downstream of the air heaters, the SO3
probably combines with moisture to  form adsorbed H2SO4 on the fly ash.  The
HgSC^ is highly hygroscopic and attracts  free  moisture to further enhance
the conduction.

      The  rate at which H2SO4 is adsorbed is dependent on the composition
of the fly ash surface.  If the particulate surface is acidic or neutral, ad-
sorption occurs only by van der Waal's forces or physical adsorption,  which
involves nonspecific,  relatively weak attractive forces between the solid
particle surface and the gas molecule!  On the other hand, if the particu-
late surface is basic,  strong chemical attractive forces of the same nature
and magnitude  as those involved in chemical bonds are present,  resulting
in much higher adsorption rates.

      This mechanism of the formation of the conductive film appears to  be
substantiated by experience with specific fly ash which indicates that ash
high in basic constituents is conditioned  much more readily by SO3 than is
ash high in acidic constituents.  Conversely,  acidic particles appear to be
more readily conditioned by a basic  conditioning agent.

      Darby and Heinrich4 reported apparent physical differences in fly ash
which has been conditioned by the addition of SO3.  Electron microscope  •
photographs of nonconditioned dust showed completely smooth surfaces,
while conditioned dust exhibited a surface film.  They postulated that as
a result of this film or layer,  a more conductive path was provided.  Figure
7. 5 is a photograph provided by the Central Electricity Generating Board
illustrating a "conditioned" fly ash.   It is proposed that SO3 tended  to be

-------
                                   -174-


                           -.«	  ~
                        % a
Figure 7. 5.  Conditioned Fly Ash Particle - CERL,  England (20, OOOX)

-------
                                    -175-
adsorbed on the particle surface at temperatures up to 400°C,  and upon
cooling,  the adsorbed SO3 brought down water vapors to form liquid/semi-
plastic nodules as shown.  These nodules,  in turn,  resulted in lower re-
sistivity  and stronger mechanical bonds between adjacent particles.  Diam-
eter of the particles  shown is in the range of from 0. 3-3 microns.  No
photograph of nonconditioned particles was available for comparison.

      A sample of fly ash from a power plant in Alabama burning low sulfur
(approximately 0, 5%) coal was obtained for  comparison by Southern Research
Institute. According to observations mentioned previously, the fly ash
should have a high resistivity and be difficult to precipitate.

      Figure 7. 6 is an electron microscope photograph taken at Southern
Research Institute of one of the typical particles enlarged approximately
80, 000 X.  Clearly visible on the surface are aggregates similar to the
"nodules" shown on the conditioned fly ash.  This observation leaves some
question as to the significance of these surface characteristics with respect
to resistivity.

      A review of much of the literature available on the fundamentals of
electrostatic precipitation reveals that very little recent experimental
work, and no recent  theoretical work,  has been reported in the field of
gas conditioning and  resistivity of dusts.  This is particularly  surprising
in view of the relatively important role of resistivity in precipitation.

      A fundamental  investigation with modern instrumental methods now
available should provide a much needed quantitative model of conductivity
and conditioning mechanisms.

      There  is some  evidence that the  resistivity of collected dust may not
be a static property.   Cohen3 reports that the resistivity of fly ash collected
in a cyclone  separator  varies by two orders of magnitude in a period of 15
to 20  minutes.   It is postulated that the increase in resistivity  is due to a
loss of the absorbed film due either to physical or chemical interaction with
the bulk  of the  dust particle.  If similar changes occur in the collected dust
layer,  a  resistivity gradient could occur with the freshly collected dust
having a  lower resistivity than that deposited earlier.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                          »»*

                                                                                            OS
                                                                                            I
                                                                         0.5
Figure 7.6.  Unconditioned Fly Ash Particle - Low Sulfur Coal (80, OOOX)

-------
                                     -177-
7. 4  FIELD CONDITIONING STUDIES

      In the precipitation of high resistivity dusts,  the addition of condition-
ing agents to the gas stream is an option in improving precipitator perform-
ance.  The choice of whether to meet the requirements by additional precipi-
tator capacity or by the use of conditioning agents is largely one of economics.

      The types of conditioning agents used in dust conditioning are moisture,
sulfur trioxide, and ammonia.  Other  agents, such as sulfuric acid,  ammo-
nium sulfate,  and ammonium bisulfite, have been tried experimentally, but
no operating plants utilize these agents on  a continuous basis.
7. 5" MOISTURE CONDITIONING

      Moisture can be used as a conditioning agent in processes in which
gases exit at temperatures in the range of 1500-2500° F.  Normal practice
is to cool the gases to temperatures that can be handled by the precipitator
by the injection and subsequent evaporation of water.  The process of cool-
ing raises the humidity of the gases entering the precipitator and  can result
in resistivities in a suitable range for precipitation.

      The effect of gas cooling by water spray  can be seen from the high
temperature psychrometric chart as shown in Figure 7.7.  If gases from
the process enter the cooling chamber at,  say, 1300° F with a moisture
content (wt.  moisture)  of 3% and are cooled by evaporation of water to
         (wt. dry air)
300° F,  the resulting moisture content will be approximately 24%.   Under
these conditions, the resistivity of  the collected dust should be  reasonably
low.  On the other  hand,  if the starting temperature is only 700° F,  cooling
to 300°F would result in  a moisture content of  only about 11%.

      On processes in which heat recovery is used,  the gas temperature
is normally too low to evaporate the amount of water necessary to provide
adequate conditioning.  An example is the flue  gas from steam electric
generating plants which leaves the air preheater at temperatures  of from
250-400° F.

      Field tests on water conditioning were carried out at the Pyrmont
Station of the Electricity  Commission of New South Wales using steam from
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
0.30
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                      I
       100   200   300   400   500  600   700   800   900  1000  1100  1200  1300

                                       Temperature, °F
                    Figure 7.7.  High-Temperature Psychrometric Chart.

-------
                                     -179-
the soot blowers,  water sprays in the combustion chamber,  and water sprays
in the flue following the air heater.  It was found that spray water injection
in the duct following the air heater did not result in complete evaporation of
the water, and carryover to the precipitator caused excessive dust buildup
on the electrodes.

      As steam,  injections of 12, 000 Ib/hr were found to be  required  on the
plant at Pyrmont, which was  considered uneconomical as compared with
other conditioning agents.

      Moisture conditioning in the form of steam injection is used on inter-
mittent processes, such as EOF furnaces, to provide moisture during the
interval between the start of oxygen lancing and the beginning of water
spray cooling. Water sprays in the cooling tower are normally thermo-
statically controlled to start at a preset gas temperature to ensure com-
plete evaporation of the water.  In the absence of the steam conditioning,
high stack emissions known as lance puffs will occur, until such time  as
the temperature reaches the point that resistivity is in the proper range.
7.6  CHEMICAL CONDITIONING

      Extensive pilot and full trials with sulfur trioxide conditioning have
been carried out in this country, the United Kingdom,  and Australia.  An
operating plant at the Kincardine,  Scotland station of the South of Scotland
Electricity Generating  Board utilizes SO3 injection as  a regular operating
practice.  Tests on the plant show improvements from collection efficien-
cies from 60-65% to somewhat over 90% with additions of around 10 ppm SO3.
Results at Kincardine have led to the design of SO3 conditioning plants for
the Central Electricity Generating Board plant at Rugeley  and another in
South Africa in which sulfur is to be burned on site and the SO2 catalytically
oxidized to SO3.

      The SO3 injection facilities are generally rather simple in  concept.
The sulfur trioxide used is a stabilized form to prevent polymerization,
and is  supplied to the plant from a temperature controlled railroad tank
car or truck.  It is generally stored in a heated insulated tank with the tem-
perature being 20-30°C (68-86°F).
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -180-
      From the storage tank, the liquid SO3 is piped to a metering flow con-
troller and than to an evaporator to convert the liquid SO3 to a gas.  The SO3
gas can be mixed with dry air for transport through heated pipes to the dis-
tribution manifold.  From the manifold it is distributed in the flue gas duct
through a series of pipes fitted with teflon nozzles.

      The major problems with SO3 additions are the cost of process,  the
requirements for temperature and moisture control, and the safety aspects
associated with handling of SO3.  Temperature control is required in the
system because liquid SO3 solidifies at temperatures below  around 20°C,
and boils at around 44°C.  Both  extremes must be avoided during storage
and transport.  Moisture must also be excluded from storage,  metering,
and piping to prevent the formation of sulfuric acid and subsequent corro-
sive attack on the system.

      There is some reluctance  on the part of plant personnel to the use of
SO3 conditioning due to the safety problems.  In either liquid or gaseous
form, SO3 is an effective oxidizer and strongly attacks tissue.   Leaks from
the system form dense acid  fumes as SO3 reacts with atmospheric moisture,
and safety precautions must be  considered.  The problems,  however,  are
not unlike those associated with  many chemical plants  and difficulties can
be avoided by proper design of the system, especially  selection of valves,
seals, etc.,  to prevent leakage.

      Figure 7.8 is  a schematic diagram of an SO3 conditioning plant used
in pilot scale  studies in tests at  the Creil station of Electricite de France.

      Experience with SO3 conditioning of fly ash has been varied, ranging
from  substantial improvements with additions of 10-20 ppm to requirements
of over 100 ppm without striking improvement.  The difference  in effective-
ness appears  to be in the nature of the fly ash. Tests  conducted on the
Tallawarra plant of  the Electricity Commission of New South Wales  showed
that SO3 was effective in reducing the resistivity,  but quantities were about
600%  greater  than estimated from prior experience with  low sulfur coals.
Subsequent tests showed the ash to be acid (pH 3-5. 5) and perhaps account
for the relative ineffectiveness of the SO3 additions.  Baxter5 reports sim-
ilar experience with SO3 conditioning of acidic fly ash.

-------
                                     -181-
uu
         (1)
   (10)
                                                               (12)
                                                                     (U)
      1.  Heating Filaments
      2.  SO3 Evaporator
      3.  Flow-Controller
      4.  Air Reheater
      5.  Condensation Pots
 6.  Air Tanks
 7.  Air Dryer
 8.  Pressure Regulator
 9.  Air
10.  Duct, No. 1
11.  Duct, No. 2
12.  Injection Manifold
    Figure 7.8  Schematic Diagram of SO3 Conditioning Plant.
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -182-
      Ammonia has been used extensively as a conditioning agent to reduce
the normally high resistivity of aluminum silicate catalyst dust from petro-
leum cracking processes used in the production of high-octane gasoline.
The dust resistivity from the cracking operation is normally high (about
5 x 10 ohm-cm).  It was found that additions of about 20 ppm of ammonia
reduced the resistivity to around ltf° ohm-cm and minimized sparking and
back corona problems associated with the higher  resistivity material.  Ammo-
nia additions were utilized as a standard procedure  on such plants,  since
the cost of conditioning proved to be  low in relation to improved precipitator
performance and recovery of the valuable catalyst.

      Conditioning of fly ash by ammonia addition to the flue  gas  is not so
straightforward as SO3 addition. Baxter reports  that ammonia addition to
the flue gas of power plants  must be  made ahead of the air heater at tem-
peratures of around 700° F.  Injections downstream of the air heater at
lower temperatures showed no conditioning effect.5

      The formation of ammonium  bisulfate in the temperature range of
570-670°F

                          SO3  +  NH3 + H2O  =  NH4  HSO4

                          (gas)  (gas)   (gas)      (liquid)

was suggested as  a possible reaction.

      Consideration of this product as a conditioning agent is  consistent
with the experience  and theory advanced by Dalmon and Tidy6 who investi-
gated the use  of sulfamic acid and ammonium sulfate conditioning of fly ash
in a laboratory precipitator.  Both compounds were believed to be converted
in this temperature  range to a mist of ammonium bisulfate droplets which
were subsequently attached to fly ash particles with a resultant improve-
ment in precipitability.

      Baxter reports associated problems with ammonia conditioning due
to the fouling  of heat exchanger surfaces by solid ammonium bisulfate at
temperatures below 300°F.

      Full scale experience with ammonia conditioning has been somewhat
varied.  Tests on the acidic  ash of the Tallawarra station of the Electricity

-------
                                  -183-
Commission of NSW showed an increase in efficiency from 85-99% from
additions of 15-20 ppm of ammonia.  This is contrasted to the require-
ments of SO3 in excess of 100 ppm with the same ash.  Figure 7.9 shows
the effect of ammonia additions on the electrical readings.  The increase
in voltage and decrease in current are indicative of the decrease in resis-
tivity accompanying ammonia additions.

      The major  reason for addition of conditioning agents is to reduce the
resistivity of a normally high resistivity ash.  However, it has been reported
that difficulties arising from the operation of precipitators below the acid
dew point can be  corrected by conditioning additives.   Tests on full scale
plants at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Widow's Creek Plant have shown
increases in efficiency of from  50% to 95% with additions of around 15 ppm
of ammonia.

      Reese and Greco7 have shown that increases in efficiency of the same
order can be achieved by increasing the precipitator inlet gas temperature,
which would tend to result in an increase rather than a decrease in resis-
tivity.  This evidence would indicate that increases in efficiency with am-
monia injection are associated with an increase in resistivity by effectively
removing some of the SO3  or H2SO4.  This would be in contrast to the
usual procedure of adding  conditioning agents to reduce resistivity.

      Full scale SO3 injection operations have been carried out in Australia,
England, Scotland, France, and South Africa.

      Darby and Heinrich8 present some economic considerations for a full
scale SO3 injection system  similar to the installation at Kincardine,
Scotland.  The equipment for a 300 MW plant consisting primarily of
SO3 storage tanks,  an evaporator,  and an  injector  manifold, was estima-
ted to cost approximately $63, 000 (1966).  At an injection rate of 10 ppm
SO3 for 8000 hrs,  annual operating costs were estimated at $25,000 based
on the 1966 price of SO3 in England, and $5000 for heating costs.

      Coutaller and Richard9 describe a similar installation in France and
estimate investment costs for a 125 MW to 250 MW plant at $60, 000 to
$80, 000 (1967).  Operating costs  for SO3 at  about  17 ppm (v/v) were esti-
mated at about $ 11, 000 to $ 12, 000 per year (125 MW).
                                               SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                    -184-
            Start with          Start with
           clean electrodes^ NHa injection
  20r 30

1 10 (-5 20
   OL 10
  10j- 40  -- -
1  5 (£30

   OL 20
   4r 50

1  11£40
   OL 30
          0  20  40  60  80  100 120  140
                    Time, min
 Figure 7.9.  Effect of Ammonia Conditioning on Southern
             N.S.W.  Fly Ash.  Specific Collecting Area,
             300 ft2/1000 ft3 per min; Mean Gas Temperature,
             280° F.

-------
                                    -185-
      Alternatives for the use of stabilized liquid SO3,  a source of chemi-
cal conditioning,  may affect the economics.  For example, sulfuric acid
injections have been tried with some success,  although quantitative data
on cost and effectiveness as compared with SO3 are not substantiated.
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -186-
                               CHAPTER 7
                             BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. White,  H. J.,  Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation,  Addison-Wesley
    (1963).

2.  Schmidt,  W. A.,  "Electrical Precipitation and Mechanical Dust
    Collection". I. &E. C.  Proc., 41,  No. 11,  2428 (1949).

3.  Cohen, L. and Dickinson, R. W.,  "The Measurement of the Resistivity
    of Power Station Flue Dust",  J.  Sci. Instrum., _40, 72 (1963).

4.  Darby, K. H.  and Heinrich, D. O.,  'Conditioning of Boiler Flue Gases
    for Improving Efficiency of Electrofilters",  Staub 26. No.  11, 12(1966).

5.  Baxter, W. A., "Recent Experience with Ammonia Conditioning of
    Power Boiler Flue Gases", JAPCA 18.  No.  12,  817  (Dec.  1968)

6.  Dalmon,  J. and Tidy, D., "Effect of Ammonium Sulphate and Related
    Compounds on the Performance of an Experimental Electrostatic
    Precipitator", CERL Laboratory Note,  Central  Electricity Generating
    Board, England,  (1968).

7.  Reese, J. T.  and Greco, J., "Experience with Electrostatic Fly-Ash
    Collection Equipment Serving Steam-Electric Generating Plants",
    JAPCA 18, No. 8, 523 (1968).

8.  Darby, K. and Heinrich,  D. O., "Conditioning of Boiler Flue Gases
    for Improving Efficiency of Electrofilters",  Staub, 26, No. 11, 12
    (Nov.  1966), Engl. Transl.

9.  Coutaller, J.  and Richard,  C., "Improvement of Electrostatic Dust-
    Filtering by SO3 Injection", Pollution Atmospherique (Paris) 9, No.  33,
    (Mar.  1967),  Fr.

-------
                                    -187-
                                CHAPTER 8
          ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
      Systems analysis is the term applied to the analytical study of a com-
plete process.  This technique  is particularly useful for analyzing the behav-
ior of processes that are characterized by strong interdependencies between
the system subfunctions.   The significant subsystem functions of an electro-
static precipitator were described in the preceding chapters of this document.
These fundamental relations  have been available either qualitatively or quan-
titatively for many years; however, the comprehensive behavior of the entire
system has not been presented  in a form that is useful for either the design
or analysis of complete installations.  The purpose  of this  chapter is to re-
port on the progress in the development of the application of this systems
analysis technique to the electrostatic precipitator.

      The benefits of a complete systems analysis of electrostatic preci-
pitation are threefold.  First, it permits  a systematic review of the param-
eters that influence precipitator performance.   A review of this nature points
out the significance of the relationships that  are known and  also pinpoints
those areas where quantitative  relationships are not available.   Second,  it
may permit the design of precipitators from theoretical relationships rather
than empirical ones.  Finally,  utilizing this  approach, there  is a possibility
for optimizing the performance of a precipitator for a given set of dust and
gas properties.

      Present design methodology utilizes empirical data accumulated from
past experience.  The relationships that are used do in fact contain informa-
tion that could be derived  from theoretical considerations.  There is a pos-
sibility of improving the design techniques by replacing the empirical rela-
tionships with theoretical  ones.  Experience has shown that the performance
of fly ash collectors is, in general, related to the particle  size distribution
of the dust.  The  overall systems analysis should be able to provide informa-
tion to go one step further and explain how and why this is so.

      The electrostatic precipitator is actually  a single subsystem in the
overall operation of an installation.  The  input parameters  to this subsystem
are dictated by the overall behavior of the entire installation.   For example,
if the dust collector is  installed in a coal-fired  steam electric generating
plant,  the input conditions are established by the boiler load and other oper-
ating parameters of the installation.  The primary input parameters of the
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -188-
installation are:

                    dust load,
                    particle size,
                    resistivity,
                    gas volume flow rate,
                    temperature, and
                    composition.

These input parameters may be adjusted by the plant operator on the basis
of overall system optimization,  but in general are beyond the control of the
precipitator manufacturer.  These parameters do dictate the operational
constraints on the electrostatic precipitator unit.

      A second constraint on the system is the participate emission limit
established for the output gas conditions.  These constraints determine the
required behavior of the precipitator.  For the systems analysis approach,
the above factors constitute the independent input and output constraints
for the precipitator system.
8.1  GENERALIZED PRECIPITATOR MODEL

      The unit subfunctions required for electrostatic precipitation have
been discussed elsewhere in this report.  These subfunctions, namely,

                    source of unipolar ions,
                    formation of an electric field,
                    particle  charging,
                    particle  collection,  and
                    dust removal,
together with their interdependent relationships can be described in a
functional block diagram.  One possible system block diagram is shown
in Figure 8.1.

      The behavior of each unit subfunction  has been discussed in previous
chapters.  However,  in the fundamental theory section, the functional be-
havior of the subsystem was stressed.  In systems analysis,  a description of

-------
                                                      I Resistivity I
in
0
c
x
PI
a
   Wire Rad.
   Collector Rad.
   Wire Roughness
   Sec.  Er-.is.
   Aval. Coeff.
   Ionizing Rad. ^^
                     van der Waals, Molecular,
                         and Mechanical
    Electroneg. Gas
    Gas Velocity
    Velocity Dist.
    Collection Area
    Volume Flow

    Applied Voltage
    Gas Dnnsity
    Ion Mobility
    Dust Thickness
    S e ctionalization
    Collection Area
    Wire Rad.
    Collector-Had.
Partif!-- Size
Dielect. Const.
Time
Temperature
Dust Load
Gas and Dust
Ion Velocity
                                                                       00
                                                                       CO
                                                                        I
                                           Gas and Uncollected Dust

                                           Collected Dust
Dust Load
Plate Design
Hopper Design
Gas Velocity
Gas Dist.
Rapping Force
Happing Interval
                                                                                                           Particle Size
                                                                                                           Dust Prop.
                                                                                                           Temperature
H
                                    Figure 8.1.   Electrostatic Precipitator System Model.

-------
                                    -190-


the strong Lnterdependencies among these subsystems is necessary to pro-
vide a description of the entire system function.  The complexity evident
from Figure 8.1 points to the necessity for a high speed computer to allow
definitive computations.  Without the computer, the system flow diagram
will only serve to point out the  strong interrelationships in the system.

      There are several system subfunctions where the detailed quantitative
relationships are not yet available. The qualitative effects are known, but
further research is required to complete the definition of the system behav-
ior.

      Examples of these factors include;

      (1)  specific relationship  between the electric wind and particle
          collection,,

      (2)  specific particle reentrainment factors,

      (3)  relationship between  resistivity, current density, and
          sparking conditions as a function of position within the
          precipitator, and

      (4)  detailed relationship  between particulate and ionic space
          charge as a function  of position within the precipitator.

      These factors are known  to modify the behavior of an electrostatic
precipitator,  but the specific relationships necessary for detailed calcu-
lations must be determined.
8. 2  SIMPLIFIED SYSTEM MODEL

      A simplified system model was developed as the first step in the
detailed model.  In this model, the unknown factors listed above were
neglected.  A second simplification was possible because the model was
used for evaluation of operating installations rather than for the design
of new installations.  Voltage and current measurements were available,
thus eliminating the need for the inclusion of the corona generation sub-
system.  The simplified model block diagram is shown in Figure 8. 2.

-------
                                                      I Resistivity)
c
X
PI
a
z
n

z

H
H
n
     Wire Had.
     Collector Rad.
     Wire Roughness
     Sec. Erms.
     Aval. Coeff.
     Ionizing Rad.
     Electroneg. Gas
     Gas Velocity
     Velocity Dist.
     Collection Area
     v'ol'jme Flow

     Applied Voltage
     Gas Density
     Ion Mobility
     Dust Thickne:
     Soctionalization
     Collection Area
     Wire Rad.
     Collector Rad.
      Size
      Const.
Par tic!'.
Dielect.
Time
Temperature
Dust Load
Gas and Dust
Ion Velocity
                                                                                                     van der Waals, Molecular
                                                                                                                                               i
                                                                                                                                              t—i
                                                                                                                                              CD
                                                                                                                                              t-L
                                                                                                                                               I
Dust Load
Plate Design
Hopper Design
Gas Velocity
Gas Dist.
Rapping Force
Rapping Interval
                                                                                                                  . Gas and Uncollected Dust

                                                                                                                   Collected Dust
                                                                                                 Particle Size
                                                                                                 Dust Prop.
                                                                                                 Temperature
Figure  8.2,
                   Electrostatic Precipitator System  Model -  Parts Simulated in Computer Program in
                   Heavy  Line.

-------
                                     -192-
The inputs to the model are listed in Tables 8.1 and 8. 2
                                 Table 8.1
                       Input Parameters from Boiler
Dust Load,  D
Gas Volume Flow,  v
Particle Size Distribution
Dust Resistivity, p
Gas Temperature,  T
Particle Dielectric Constant,  c
                                                   grains/ft
                                                   ft3/ min

                                                   ohm-cm
                                                   °p
                                                   F/meter
                                Table 8. 2
                         Precipitator Parameters
      Collection Electrode Area, A
      Corona Electrode Length, Lw
      Corona Electrode Radius, a
      Collection Electrode Radius,  b
      Corona Current, I
      Applied Voltage, V^
      Corona Wire Roughness Factor,
      Relative Air Density, d
      Ion Mobility,  ju
                                             ft2
                                             ft
                                             in.
                                             in.
                                             amps
                                             kilovolts
                                             cm2/ESU (volt) sec
      The present model is used to compute the incremental collection
efficiency of the installation as a function of particle size.  The collection
efficiency per unit distance through the precipitator is determined from
the particle charge and collection electric field.  Calculations are based
on wire and pipe equations utilizing the electrostatic system of units.  The
computation begins with a determination of the electric field within the
first foot of the unit,  and proceeds to the collection efficiency for each
particle  size.  The inlet particle size distribution is modified by the amount
of material removed in each size range.  This computation is iteratively
carried through the dust collector until the outlet dust concentration is
determined.  A list of the derived quantities is given in Table 8.3.  A

-------
                                     -193-
 system flow chart with the equations associated with each function is shown
 in Figure 8.3
                                 Table 8 . 3
                             Derived Quantities
       Breakdown Field Strength,  E0
       Breakdown Voltage,  V0
       Corona Current  per Unit Length,
       Dust Surface Area per cm3, S
       Current Density at
          Collection Electrode,  j   -,
       Average Electric Field,  E
       Saturation and Actual Charge, qs,
       Migration Velocity for Each Size,
       Gas Velocity (average)
                                   ESU/cm
                                   ESU (volts)
                                   ESU (amp/cm)
                                   cm2/cm3

                                   ESU (amp/cm2)
                                   ESU/cm
                                   ESU (Coulomb)
                                   cm/sec
                                   cm/sec
 8.3  EXAMPLE UTILIZING EXISTING SIMPLIFIED SYSTEM MODEL

    Electric field.  The equation used for the electric field in this particu
 lar model is  given below*                                           x
                                                 ii  \3Sr   n S2y2 /  r  (Q 1 \
                       I |_ ^ * '   M-"-' ~ _|           U-  \«>->-1    P >-> L  '  t   \O.I^

       This equation is valid where the contribution to the space charge is
 primarily from the charged dust.

       E0 is the breakdown field strength as shown in Chapter 1. The equa-
 tion relating E0 to applied voltage and geometry is:
                  •e
E0 =30 f d (1 + 0. 3,Vd7a)
x 3.3 ESU/cm
(8.2)
    Current required to charge the dust.  The total amount of current re-
 quired to charge the dust can be computed if the quantity of dust in each
 size range per unit time and the saturation charge for each particle is
 known.  The equation for saturation charge  due to field charging developed
* See list of symbols on Figure 8. 3.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
I
t
i


i

• 1

f
t

i A
1


E 2
tt(-r> *tiv]exp6Sr'
\
a

L

>

If
I ! • * 0

Pi * H



i 2
"JT 3Sr
1








1

t


S






^


+.



1
S»r





Ec



E
j«
i

i
r»>









c
rt




/
S








1 ' |







k










E(r)

ai-
b!







AI



Average
Value
t ,








Ni * Ai

I Materii
!
- ZANj


I
J Lp
i ^
'v
7
i
1 v~*


ri
n
L_
P












q
~$


1 - e


i
(t)
1TT)





q
'
Ec
ri


j
v

ft)




\ Wi
g Lp
I

EC


|
I








i

I
ZS /ftN
i
i >
"
AN
~N~
  a
  b
  f
 d
 E0
 V0
  I
Lw
  i
 ji
  S
A.
  j
Ec
  t
 wj
 Nj
 Lp
  v
  ti
  A
                                                                                 Wire Radius
                                                                                 Collector Radius
                                                                                 Roughness Factor
                                                                                 Relative Air Density
                                                                                 Breakdown Field Strength
                                                                                 Breakdown Voltage
                                                                                 Total Current
                                                                                 Corona Wire Length
                                                                                 Current /Length
                                                                                 Ion Mobility               ,
                                                                                 Surface Area of Dust per cm of Gas
                                                                                 Area of Plate
                                                                                 Current Density of Plate
                                                                                 Average Electric Field
                                                                               - Saturation and  Present Charge
                                                                               * Dielectric Strength Relative
                                                                               * Radius of Particulate
                                                                               * Volume Flow Rate

                                                                               » Time Lapsed in Collector
                                                                               " Migration Velocity
                                                                               • Number of Particles
                                                                               * Precipitator Length
                                                                               • Gas Velocity
                                                                               "- Efficiency
                                                                               * Increment
                                                                               * Summation
Figure 8.3.   Computer System  Flow Diagram.

-------
                                    -195-
in Chapter 3 converted to ESU is:

                              r» Ec                                (8.3)

where EC is the charging field.  Therefore, the only remaining require-
ment is determination of the number of particle charges in each particle
size range that is introduced into  the precipitator per unit time.

      Particle size distributions are generally available for dusts that are
to be collected.  The particle size  continuum  given for a given installation
can be approximated by an equivalent set of discrete particle sizes that
approaches the specific distribution, as shown in Figure 8.4.  The con-
tinuum was replaced by a set of particle sizes where all the material in
each  size range interval can be  considered to be made up of identical
spheres.

      The total weight of dust introduced per unit time is obtained from the
product of the dust concentration (D) and the gas volume flow rate
               W  =  vg/\  x D    ,g£|n_\  x/J£§m_\         (8.4)
                      &\sec/         Vft    /    \grains /

where the total weight of dust per second (W) is given in units of grams/ sec.
The total weight of dust in each size range is given by the product of the
total weight of dust per  second  and the discrete mass size distribution.
The total number  of particles in each size range is determined by dividing
the total weight of material in each size range by the weight (volume x
density) of one particle.  This yields a number distribution of particles
per unit time into the precipitator.

      The total current  required to charge the particles (C ) is obtained by
summing the products of the  saturation charge per particle (qig) and the
number of particles per second in each size range  (Nj).

                     n
               Cp  =  E  qis  Ni                                    (8.5)
                    1=1

The percentage of the total current required to charge  the dust to saturation
is
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -196-
   30
(0
-.  20


I
§  10
b
Q>
cu
    0
              .35  .70  1.0   5.0  10.0  20.0   45   80   150   300  700

                                 Particle Size, \i
   Figure 8.4.  Input Particle Size Distribution and Discrete Approximation.

-------
                                     -197-
                   x   100                                          (8.6)

      The surface area of the dust per unit volume of gas is determined from
the particle size distribution and the dust load.  The number of particles in
each size range times the surface area of one particle (A^) summed over all
size intervals yields this quantity

                     n
               Si  =  S Nj A.                                      (8.7)
                    i=0

   Particle charge as a function of position.  The charge on each particle as
a function of time is related to the free ion density in the vicinity of the par-
ticle.  The  charging rate is independent of particle size for field charging.
Thus a general expression relating charge to saturation charge as  derived
in Chapter 3 is

               q(0 _    I"
               qs  "  1 +T /t                                      (8.8)

where r  -  charging time  constant =	1	  =  	—
                                  N0 e ju 7T     j 7T
The free ion charge density (N0 e) is related to the current density (j) in the
interelectrode space.   The current density can be determined from either
the known voltage-current.characteristics of the unit, or from measured
current when working with operating installations.  In this  model,  measured
currents were used.

      Since only average  values  of current were known for  individual instal-
lations, estimates of current density as a function of position within the
precipitator were used.  The variation of current with position  can probably
be determined by an iterative calculation  of charge vs.  time (distance) in
the computer,  but an approximation to this was  used in this demonstration
model.  For lack of a more definitive value,  the assumption made  for this
current distribution was that the  amount of current that went to apply charge
in each foot of the precipitator was that amount  of charge required to charge
to saturation the quantity of material expected to be removed within that
foot of the unit.  This is a conservative estimate of the amount  of charge
bound to particulate in the inlet section.   The actual bound  charge is ex-
pected to be somewhat greater in practice.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -198-
      The amount of material removed per foot, used for a gross estimate
of bound particulate charge,  is calculated from the Deutsch-Anderson equa-
tion using the expected efficiency.
                                                                      (8.9)

The free ion density is then estimated by multiplying the average free ion
density in that section of the precipitator by the ratio of the free ion charge
to total space charge within each foot of the precipitator.   This  free ion
density is used to compute the charging time constants within that increment
of the precipitator.   The charge on each particle is computed from Equation
8.3.  The time used is the distance through the precipitator divided.by the
velocity

               t =  ^-  and                                           (8.10)
                    E
              r- ... c_   from which                                  (8. II)1
                  3  if

                         1	

                                                                      (8.12)
   Collection efficiency.  At this point, values are available for the electric
field, saturation charge for each size range,  and percent, of saturation charge.
Thus, the collection efficiency for each size range within this increment can
be computed.  The equation for this efficiency for each size range is
Values are computed for each size range and stored.

      The amount of material removed within each size range is determined
by multiplying the efficiency per foot by the particle count.  This quantity
of material is  subtracted from the incoming particles to yield a new parti-
cle size  distribution as the input to the second foot of  the precipitator.  The
process  is, repeated for each foot of the collector until an output particle
size and overall efficiency is computed.

-------
                                    -199-
8.4  LIMITATIONS OF EXISTING MODEL

      As indicated previously,  the simplified precipitator model neglects
several factors that significantly influence precipitator performance.  These
factors were omitted primarily because data were not  available or because
analytical relationships had not been developed.

      A review of the factors that were omitted shows  that some of them
tend to increase the predicted efficiency, whereas others would tend to de-
crease the efficiency.  The equations for electric field strength used in the
model include  the electrostatic component and the contribution of charged
particles.  The contribution of the free ions to the electric field is consid-
erable.  However, equations relating field strength to  both free ion density
and charged particle density were not available.   Consequently, the field
predicted by the simplified computer model will be  low.  The particle charge
and collecting  field will be greater than predicted by the  model. The effect
of neglecting the ion density contribution to the electric field would be es-
pecially significant in installations preceded by a  mechanical collector.

      The computer model also does not include diffusion charging.  For
most fly ash applications,  the particle size distribution is sufficiently large
that diffusion charging is not too  significant.  However, for small size dusts,
such as metallurgical fumes, diffusion  is significant and  the effect of neg-
lecting it will result in lower predicted efficiencies.

      The effect of particle reentrainment reduces overall collection effi-
ciency.  The amount of dust lost  from each section  during rapping must be
small,  otherwise  overall  collection  efficiencies would  be low.  Since quan-
titative data relating dust loss to rapping conditions were not available, they
were not included in the model.

      Since the total corona current  was used as the basis for determining
electric field,  resistivity of the dust layer did not influence the predicted
efficiency.  High dust resistivity would serve to limit corona current and
operating voltage.  For arriving  at a precipitator design, effect of dust
resistivity in determining current-voltage characteristics must be included.
This necessitates a knowledge of the current-voltage characteristics of
the gas and the sparking limitations  as determined by precipitator geometry
and dust resistivity.
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -200-
8. 5  MODEL VERIFICATION

      The simplified model was used to predict the collection efficiency of
a few installations for which test data were available.  The purpose of the
verification was to determine how closely the simplified theory could come
to predicting efficiency, and to indicate the influence of some of the operat-
ing variables.

      Within the constraints of the factors that were omitted  in the simplified
model,  predicted efficiencies agreed reasonably well with measured effi-
ciencies,  except where excessive reentrainment was suspected.

      Table 8. 4 lists the input data to the model and the predicted and
measured efficiencies.  In Cases  1, 2,  and 3,  predicted and  measured values
were quite close.  These installations have reasonably normal conditions
and the neglect of rapping losses is probably balanced by the neglect of field
contribution to ion current and diffusion charging.

      Figure 8. 5 shows the predicted  collection efficiencies for various  par-
ticle sizes for the five cases.  The effect of the neglect of ion contribution
to the field is apparent in Case 4, which has a mechanical collector preceding
the precipitator. Consequently,  the space charge  due to charged particles
is low and the space charge due to ions would be proportionately higher for
Case 4 than for the other installations.

      Cases 4 and 5 are operated  under conditions where excessive  reentrain-
ment is suspected.  Also,  gas flow quality has not been determined.  In  view
of the neglect of these factors  in the model,  it is not surprising that varia-
tions between measured and predicted'efficiencies occur in the two cases.

-------
                                   -201-
                               Table 8.4

             Comparison Between the Measured and Computed
           Collection Efficiency for Five Fly Ash Precipitators
Unit No.        Computed Efficiency,  %       Measured Efficiency,

   1                   97.8                         99.1

   2                   98.9                         96.5

   3                   98.5                         98.4

   4                   96.5                         84.1

   5                   96.0                         55.0
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                      -202-
8
0)

i
u
99.9

  .8
  .7
  .6
  .5
  .4

99! 0

   8
   7
   6
   5
   4

  90

  80
  70
  60
  50
  40
  38
  '8
                                                        m = measured
                                                         c = computed

            o
            i-«-
            §
                                                                         90
       .5    .7 1.0   2.5  5.0   10.0 20.0  40   80    160  320   overall
                               Particle Size, n (diameter)

       Figure 8. 5.  Computed Efficiency Vs. Particle Size for Five Installations,
                    Fly Ash from Electric Utilities.  Overall Computed and
                    Measured Efficiencies Are Compared on Right Margin.

-------
                                     -203-
                               CHAPTER 9
                         DESIGN METHODOLOGY
      The design of an electrostatic precipitator for a particular installation
involves many parameters that can influence both  cost and performance.  The
more significant variables involved in the design are:

              (1)  Area and type of collection electrodes,
              (2)  Dimensions of the precipitator  shell,
              (3)  Size, spacing, and type of discharge electrodes,
              (4)  Size and type of power supply units,
              (5)  Degree of sectionalization,
              (6)  Layout of the precipitator in  accordance with physical
                     space limitations,
              (7)  Design of the gas handling system,
              (8)  Size and shape of hoppers,
              (9)  Type and number of electrode rappers,  and
              (10)  Type of dust removal equipment.

      There are several methods used for the selection of suitable values for
these variables and each manufacturer may utilize slightly different methods
in arriving at a particular design.

      The following discussions  are intended to  point out the methods that
can be used in the design or the  assessment of the adequacy of a design rather
than in presenting a detailed design handbook.

      Two approaches to the selection of precipitator size will be presented.
One  approach, Method I,  is based on the conventional Deutsch-Anderson effi-
ciency equation and the other,  Method II,  approaches the design from "the
standpoint of the  electrical requirements.  These  methods must obviously
give compatible results.   They differ mainly in  the fundamental way in which
design is approached.
9.1  DESIGN METHOD I

      A common approach to the selection of the area of collecting plate
required is to utilize the  Deutsch-Anderson equation
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -204-
                                 A
                rj  = 1 - exp (	w)
where
      A  = area of collecting surface,
     V-  = gas  flow rate,
      w  = precipitation rate parameter,
      17  = efficiency, %, and
    exp  = base of natural logarithms.

      The critical parameter in this equation is the precipitation rate w.
This parameter varies with  each  installation depending upon resistivity
and particle size of the dust, quality of gas flow, reentrainment losses,
and sectionalization, among other factors.  The values of w are selected
by the equipment manufacturers on the basis of past experience with a par-
ticular dust, or from the composition of the dust that can be related to past
experience.  Each precipitator manufacturer therefore has a file of experi-
ence from which a precipitation rate parameter can be selected, and this
file of information is kept as proprietary data.

      The values of the precipitation rate  parameter w vary with the applica-
tion as a  result of variations in dust properties.  Variations also occur
within each application area.  Table 9. 1 lists the average values of preci-
pitation rate parameters for various applications, and the range of values
that might be expected within each application.   From this table, it is ap-
parent that the spread in the values of the precipitation rate parameter is
large in some instances such as fly ash precipitators,  and within a reason-
ably narrow range within others.   For the pulp and paper industry,  a preci-
pitator designed for recovery boilers would have an uncertainty of around
15-20% in precipitation rate parameter.   For a precipitator designed for a
98% collection efficiency, the measured efficiency would  range from 97 to
99.4% based on the range of design precipitation rate parameters.

      For fly ash precipitators, on the other hand,  the variation in preci-
pitation rate parameters is quite  large, so that a precipitator designed on
the basis  of a w of 0.43 for 98% efficiency would give an efficiency  of only
around 75%  if the precipitation rate parameter were 0. 13 ft/sec.

      The major problem in the design of precipitators based on this
approach  is in the selection  of the precipitation rate parameter for the
specific application.  Several techniques can be used to narrow

-------
                                  -205-
                                Table 9.1

       Representative Precipitation Rates for Various Applications
                                         Precipitation Rate w ft/sec
Application                               Average          Range

Utility Fly Ash                             0.43          0.13-0.67
Pulp & Paper                              0.25          0.21-0.31
Sulfuric Acid                               0.24          0.20-0.28
Cement (wet)                               0.35          0.30-0.40
Smelter                                    0.06
Open Hearth                                0.16
Cupola                                     0.10
Blast Furnace                              0.36          0.20-0.46
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -206-
the uncertainty of the value of w to be used.  If the in-situ resistivity of the
dust is known, the precipitation rate parameter can be determined for some
applications.   Figure 9. 1 shows the variation in w with resistivity for fly
ash precipitators.  If the precipitator being designed is a replacement for,
or an addition to an existing unit,  resistivity can be measured, and the
uncertainty in the value of w can be reduced.  Alternatively,  if a similar
installation burning the same fuel  is available, measurements of resistivity
can be made and the  value of w selected with some confidence.

      The data from  Figure 9. 1 only apply to fly ash or to a dust with simi-
lar properties.  If the particle size differs significantly,  the absolute values
of w will change,  although the general character of the curves would be sim-
ilar.

      In-situ  resistivity data have not been determined to the same degree
in applications other than fly ash,  so that statistically reliable data relating
w and resistivity are not generally available.

      If it is impractical to select w on the basis of resistivity,  other  factors
can often be used.  In fly ash precipitators, resistivity is influenced by the
sulfur content of the  fuel, and relationships have been developed between
precipitation  rate parameter w and percent sulfur.  Figure 9. 2 shows  a curve
developed by  Ramsdell  for a group of fly ash precipitators burning coals of
varying sulfur contents.  On a statistical basis, the precipitation rate  can be
predicted within reasonable accuracy.   However,  on an individual installation,
the variations are  too great to predict w with acceptable precision based upon
sulfur content alone.  In many  instances, the only information available is
the sulfur content of the coal,  and designs are sometimes based solely upon
this parameter.

      Particle size of the dust is a very important consideration in determin-
ing the value  of w for design purposes.  Referring to Table 9. 1, the variations
in w between  the various application areas are due largely to particle size
variations.  In cement kilns,  the alkali content of the raw material alters  the
size distribution of the dust.   Metallurgical operations characteristically
produce smaller size dusts from high temperature melting operations.   Size
of dusts from recovery boilers in  pulp and paper mills can change with tem-
perature.  These factors result in variations  in precipitation rate param-
eters between the various applications, and within the same application area.
1Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.

-------
     0.656
  u  ° 492
id v
0« »
at

K
U
••-I
o
     0.328
     0.164
20	1	1—»  I  MM
10
  u
  a>
  w


  "B
  o
                       I   I  I  I 8 I I
                                        -207-
T	1—I  I  I >M
                                    l  i i  i
T	1—I  I I I I
           10"
                     10                      10

                        Resistivity, ohm-cm
                                                            11
                                       10
            Figure 9.1.   Relationship between Precipitation Rate Parameter and

                         Resistivity.  (Reference 2)
                                                         SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                          -208-
        0.656
 E
 cd
 (4
 cd
P*

 0)

td
 O
 D.
•«-i
 O
   0.492
u
0)
(0
        0.328
        0.164
          r-20
                                      Temp - 300° F
          -   5
               01           2

                    Sulfur Content of the Fuel,
Figure 9.2.
        Relationship between Precipitation Rate Parameter

        and Sulfur Content for Electric Utility Installations

        at a Temperature of 300°F (Reference 1). '

-------
                                    -209-
      The sections covering the specific application areas in Part II de-
scribe the emissions from each process in greater detail, and also present
data showing the range of design and test precipitation rate parameters
where they are available.  Reference should be made to each section for a
more detailed analysis of the range of precipitation rate parameters.

      When the selection of precipitation rate parameter has been made,
the area of collecting surface required to achieve a given efficiency when
handling a given gas volume can be determined.

      The power required for a particular application is determined on an
empirical basis.  The power requirements for a given application are  rela-
ted to the efficiency and the  gas volume handled.  Figure 9. 3 is a curve
showing the power requirements per unit of gas volume for two applications;
fly ash and pulp and paper mill recovery boilers.  Similar curves can  be
developed for other applications.  The second step in design, therefore, is
to determine the total power requirements based on efficiency and gas flow.
Note that the recovery boiler precipitators require greater power per  unit
of gas flow to achieve the same efficiency as a fly  ash precipitator.  This
is primarily due to differences in particle size of the dust,  and is related
to the precipitation rate parameter.

      Figure 9. 4 shows the variation in collection  efficiency with the number
of independently powered bus sections.  The number of sections required
to reach a given efficiency can be determined from curves for the specific
application.  The curves shown in Figure 9.4 are for fly ash precipitators,
and were developed from empirical relationships from a large number of
tests.

      The above procedure will provide a rational  basis for arriving at
plate area, total power, and degree of sectionalization required.   It should
be recognized that the selection of the value of w and the curves relating
power and  sectionalization requirements are all interrelated.   If inadequate
sectionalization is used, a lower value of w would  result,  the precipitator
could not be operated at the  required power level,  and the efficiency would
be reduced.  Consequently,  curves relating the design parameter  should be
internally consistent.

      The type and number of rappers for  the collecting and discharge elec-
trodes depend upon the properties of the dust,  gas properties,  current
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -210-
c
0»
c
o
3
o
V
    99
0
         rFly Ash

          Prepipitator
                                            Recovery Boiler

                                              Precipitator
      0
             100        200        300         400

                    Power Rate, watts per 1000 cfm
500
600
              Figure 9.3.  Collection Efficiency Vs. Power Rate.

-------
                                   -211-
c
4)
w
u
0)
1—I
•3
u
    99.9,
    99.0
90.0


80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
                                                    / 1.8% Sulfur,
                                                      300°F
        012345
                     Number of Bus Sections per 100, 000 cfm

        Figure 9.4.  Relationship between Collection Efficiency and
                     Sectionalization (Reference 2).
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -212-
densities, and the configuration of the electrodes and electrode support
structures.  High resistivity dust is usually harder to remove  because of
the increased force holding it to the plate.  Low temperature operation also
tends to give a  moist dust that is more difficult to remove.  Table 9. 2 shows
the number of rappers per unit area of collecting electrode and the number
per unit length  of discharge wire for a group of installations.

      The following example will serve to illustrate this design approach.
Design an electrostatic precipitator for a pulverized fuel boiler with the
following given conditions:

              (1) Dust resistivity  7 x 1010 ohm- cm
              (2) Gas temperature 300°F
              (3) Gas volume 750, 000 acfm
              (4) Sulfur content 1.8%

      Example  1

      (a) Select a precipitation rate parameter.
         From Figure 9. 1,  the precipitation rate parameter corresponding
         to a dust resistivity of 7 x 10  ohm-cm is  0.35 ft/sec or 21  ft /mitt.

      (b) From the Deutsch-Anderson equation

                    i       /> A   v
              r?  -  1 - exp ( -— • w)
                             g
          or rearranging

                            100
                 -  w      100 - r?

                    750,000        100
                       21    m  100 - 99

                 =  35; 600 In 100*

                 =  164, 000 sq ft

      (c)  Compute total power requirements.
          From Figure  9.3, power required for 99% efficiency is 140 watts/
          1000 cfm.  For 750, 000 cfm, total power = 750 x 140 = 105, 000 watts.

      (d)  Determine number of bus sections.
          From Figure  9.4, number of bus sections required is 3. 5 per
          1000 cfm.  7. 5  x 3. 5 = about 26 bus sections.

-------
                                    -213-
                                Table 9. 2
                            Rapping Practices
Application

Utilities

Pulp and Paper

Metals

Cement
Collection Electrode
  Rappers/I OOP ft2

    0.25 - 0.90

    0.25 - 0.99

    0.11 - 0.82

    0.33 - 0.52
Corona Electrode
 Rappers/1000 ft

  0.09 - 0.66

  0.21 - 0.32

  0. 28 - 0. 50

  0.19 - 0.33
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -214-
9. 2  DESIGN METHOD II

      A second approach to the sizing of precipitators is to determine the elec-
trical characteristics first and develop relationships that relate efficiency and
power requirements to the required collection surface area.  The concept of
the electrical approach is based on the theoretical factors that influence the
precipitation rate parameter, that is, the current required to charge the par-
ticles and provide the space charge field, and the voltage required to estab-
lish the electrostatic collection field.

      In this design method,  the curves relating efficiency and corona power
density are developed on an empirical basis.  The curves are the same as
that for Design Method I, and are given for fly ash and recovery boiler preci-
pitators in Figure 9.3.   Figure 9.5 is an empirically developed curve show-
ing relationship between precipitation rate parameter w and corona power den-
sity.  Since the total power has been  determined previously, the  collecting
surface area can be  computed from the data read from  Figure 9. 5.  The  num-
ber of independent bus sections can be determined in the same manner as in
method I.   The following example will serve to illustrate  the design proce-
dure based on this method.

      Example 2

      (a)  Select a precipitation rate parameter.
          From  experience with this  coal,  the precipitation rate parameter is
          selected to be 0.35 ft/sec.

      (b)  Compute corona  power.
          From  Figure 9.3,  power per unit volume  corresponding to a col-
          lection efficiency of 99% is 141 watts/1000 cfm.   The total power
          is then computed:

                      141  watts    x 750>0oOcfm  =  105, 000 watts
                      1000 cfm

      (c) Determine collection electrode area
         From Figure 9.4,  for w  =  0.35 ft/sec, power density =0.64
         watts/ft,  area =  power total   power density = 105, 000
         watts x .1 ft     =  164, 000 ft2
                 0. 64 watt

-------
                                    -215-
     20   g.




     18


16



14



12



10



 8



 6



 4



 2
         '0.53
          0,40
                 m

                5
          0.27
          0.14
        0   0.1  0.2   0.3  0.4   0.5  0.6   0.7  0.8  0.9


                              Power Density, watts/ft2
                                                         1.0  1.1   1.2
         Figure 9. 5.  Linear Relationship between Precipitation Rate Parameter

                     and Power Density for Fly Ash Collectors.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -216-
      (d)  Number of electrical sections
          From Figure 9. 5 the number of sections per 100, 000 cfm at 99%
          efficiency = 3.5
                                        _n_
          Number of sections 2. 8 x     > ™ —  =  26


      It should be noted that the curves relating the various factors in
method II must also be mutually compatible.  The major difference between
these two design methods is that the empirical data are used to arrive at
the collecting surface  area as opposed to the use of the Deutsch-Anderson
equation.  In the examples shown,  the precipitation rate parameter w was
used in both instances. However,  it is possible to develop other relation-
ships that would eliminate the necessity for arriving at a value of w alto-
gether.  Such relationships would be empirical and be subject  to the same
degree of uncertainty as the selection of the precipitation rate parameter.

      A more fundamental approach to precipitator design would be based
upon theoretical factors such as particle size,  gas composition, dust  resis-
tivity, precipitator dimensions, and other input conditions.  This method is
discussed in the chapter on systems analysis.  However, at this time,
techniques for design based only on theoretical relationships have not been
developed to the extent that they can be used on a  commercial  basis.

      Consideration in the design of the gas handling equipment and ash
removal systems is covered in other sections.

-------
                                  -217-

                               CHAPTER 9
                          DESIGN METHODOLOGY
1.     Ramsdell, R. G.,  "Design Criteria for Precipitators for Modern
      Control Station Power Plants, " Proc. Am. Power Conf.  30,
      (April, 1968) Abstr.  Combustion 39.

2.     White,  H. J., Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation, Addison-Wesley,
      Reading,  Massachusetts  (1963).                  "~~
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -218-
                               CHAPTER 10
                       MECHANICAL COMPONENTS
      The mechanical construction of an electrostatic precipitator varies
according to the particular process to which it is applied and according
to the design philosophy of the precipitator manufacturer.  Broadly clas-
sified, precipitators  are of the tubular or plate type depending on the col-
lection electrode geometry.  Precipitators are further classified as hori-
zontal or vertical-flow  types depending on the direction of gas flow through
the precipitator.
10. 1  TUBULAR TYPE PRECIPITATORS

      Tubular type precipitators are composed of cylindrical collection
electrodes with discharge electrodes passing through the axis of the cylin-
ders.  A typical arrangement of a commerical tubular precipitator is shown
in Figure 10.1.  Gas to be cleaned flows around the outside of the cylindri-
cal electrodes  and up through the inside of the cylinders where precipita-
tion takes place.  The collected dust or liquid is removed from the bottom
of the chamber.

      Hexagonal tubes are also used in tubular type precipitators to increase
the amount of collecting surface available  in a given volume since closer
packing is possible with a hexagonal configuration.

      Tubular type precipitators are frequently used where the gas flow  is
low, where mists or fogs are being precipitated, or where water flushing
is used to remove collected material.  When water flushing is used, the
tubes do not have to withstand  the rapping  forces and can be made of lighter-
weight materials.  Tube diameters  vary from 6 to 12 inches, and  lengths
of the tubes are typically between 6 and 15 feet.
10. 2  PLATE TYPE PRECIPITATORS

      The great majority of electrostatic precipitators in service are of
the plate type.  Collection plates are spaced 8 to 12 inches apart with a
series of discharge electrodes spaced along the centerline of adja-
cent plates.  A typical arrangement is shown in Figure 10. 2.  The gas to
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                -219-
                               .High Voltage Insulator
                               Compartment
    Support Insulator
Steam Collector

   High Tension
 Support Frame
      Collecting
  Electrode Pipes
         Shell
    High Tension
      Electrode

    Electrode
    Weight    —
Gas Deflector
   Cone
                                  Collected^
                                  Dust Out
        Figure 10.1.  A Single-Stage Vertical Wire and Pipe Unit.

-------
                     -220-
Figure 10.2.  Parallel Plate Precipitator.
                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -221-
be cleaned passes horizontally between the plates (horizontal flow type) or
vertically up through the plates (vertical flow type).  Material collected by
the precipitators is generally  deposited in bins or hoppers at the base of the
precipitator in the  dry bottom  type, and in a liquid in the case of the wet
bottom precipitators.  The collected material is  then removed by appropri-
ate dust handling equipment.

      The purpose  of the shell is to confine  the gas flow for proper exposure
to the electrodes, to avoid excess  heat loss, and provide structural support
for the electrodes and rapping equipment.  The shell is normally rectangular,
where plate electrodes are used^or cylindrical if tube electrodes are used.
Cylindrical shells may also be used with plate type electrode precipitators
where relatively high or low gas pressures  are encountered.1  Shell mate-
rial is usually steel; but because of particular corrosion problems, it may
be made or lined with tile, brick,  concrete,  or special corrosion-resistant
steels.  Insulation  is usually required to maintain the shell at a temperature
above the dew point if the  gases contain corrosive materials.2 Access  doors
and stairways and safety provisions are provided as auxiliary equipment.

      Gas diffuser  plates can be provided as a part of the shell to improve
gas flow.   These plates  are usually of the order of ^ inch thick with holes
to equalize gas flow.  Design of diffuser plates is covered in more detail
in the section on gas flow.  Roof and wall baffles are used to minimize  the
amount of gas which may by-pass the electrodes.
10.3  DISCHARGE ELECTRODES

      Discharge electrodes can be of a wide variety of types.   Practice
differs between American and European manufacturers in the method of
supporting the discharge electrodes.  Typical European practice is to pro-
vide a frame or tubular support for the electrodes, whereas most American
manufacturers suspend the electrodes from a support and maintain them in
position by weights and guides at the bottom.

      The shape and size of the discharge electrodes are governed by the
corona current and mechanical requirements of the system.  Where high con-
centrations  of fine dusts are encountered, space charge limits the current
flow,  especially in the inlet sections. In such cases, special electrodes
*Refer to the bibliography for this  chapter.

-------
                                    -222-
that give higher currents may be used to achieve a high power density within
the inlet sections.  Variation in the current flow and electric field within
limits is possible by controlling the type and size of discharge electrode.

   Weighted wire.  Weighted wire discharge electrodes consist of vertically
hung wires  spanning the full height of the collecting electrodes as illustra-
ted in Figure 10. 3.  They are typically from 0.100 to 0.150 inch in diam-
eter.  In practice,  they are suspended from a support frame at the top and
held taut by a weight at the bottom.   The wires are kept in place by a steady-
ing frame,  equipped with guides at the bottom.

      There is considerable variation among manufacturers in the method
of supporting the discharge wire from the support frame.   The principal
concern with the support is to minimize wire breakage due to mechanical
fatigue.  The discharge wires move under the influence of both aerodynamic
and electrical forces, and under severe conditions, mechanical fatigue
failure can  occur.  Various methods of allowing some movement of the
support have been attempted to minimize the fatigue problem.

      Wires are also subjected to localized  sparking in  regions of high
field strength and shrouds are sometimes used to give a larger diameter,
and hence low field strength in critical regions near the ends of the elec-
trodes.

   Weighted twisted squares. Weighted bar discharge electrodes consist
of vertically hung square bars spanning the full height of the collecting
electrodes.  They are usually ^inch or  -5 inch square and are twisted
longitudinally.   The twisting helps straighten the rods and increases  the
length of sharp edge, which increases the corona current.  In practice,
they are suspended from a support frame at the top and held taut by a
weight at the bottom.  The wires are kept in place by a  steadying frame
equipped with  guides  at the bottom.

   Spiral wires.  Spiral wires are formed as a spring and then pulled out.
The  ends are attached to a formed frame.  The spring tension developed
keeps the wires taut.  A complete frame containing a multiplicity of wires
is then installed between the collecting plates as a discharge electrode.
The wire used is on the order of No.  12  gauge.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                       -223-
Figure 10.3. Weighted Wire Corona Electrodes.

-------
                                    -224-
   Barbed wire.  Barbed wire is also employed for discharge electrode ser-
vice.   These wires are hung vertically and weighted at the bottom to hold
them taut.  The wires span the full height of the collecting plates.  Commer-
cial grade barbed wire has been used for this application.  The wires are
supported at the top and are guided and kept in place at the  bottom by a
steadying frame.

   Stiff electrodes.  Stiff electrodes  consist of formed sheet or structural
members rigidly fastened to a support frame at the top.  The length  can
span the height of the collecting plates or be supported from frames.   For
the longer spans, the electrodes are kept in place at the bottom by an align-
ment frame.  The thickness of the base  material is on the order of ^j inch.
In order to  enhance corona generation, the sheets are formed with sharp
edges  or with prongs pierced out of the base metal.  Figure 10. 4 shows
typical shapes of stiff discharge electrodes.

   Supported wires.  As indicated previously,  European practice generally
is to utilize a stiff  structural member for the support of the discharge elec-
trodes.  The support members (usually  tubes) are fastened rigidly to a top
support frame.  The electrodes themselves can be of a variety of shapes
ranging from circular, square twisted, or formed sheets to other special
shapes to give the desired cur rent-voltage relations.  The electrodes are
strung through crossarms fastened to the central support member or from
sections of  a rigid  frame.  The distance between supports is around 2 to
4 feet.

      The supported wire electrode system has the advantage of minimiz-
ing the wire breakage  problem since the electrodes are supported by rigid
members and remain in position and energized even if breakage of the
electrode occurs.  Figure 10. 5 illustrates two types of support frames.

   Horizontal rods. Horizontal rod type discharge electrodes are used in
vertical flow applications.  Small diameter rods (order of ^ inch) or
twisted square rods (^ to ^ inch) are placed horizontally in a metal frame.
The rods  are fastened at one end only.   The remaining end  is allowed to
float freely  in the frame to prevent rod bowing due to expansion.  The
rods are extended beyond the frame and capped with a contoured knob to
reduce end  arcing.   The frame assembly is installed between the collect-
ing plates and suspended from a support frame above.
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -225-
Figure 10.4.  Typical Shapes of Stiff Discharge Electrodes (Reference 3).

-------
                              -226-
                                    Frame
            Support Bolt
              Corona Wires
                           \
        -J.   	Central Mast
                              \
Central Mast Type
Frame Type
                                                    . ^
                                                    Cross Member
  Figure 10. 5.  Two Types of Support Structures for Corona Wires.
                                              SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -227-
10.4  DISCHARGE ELECTRODE SUPPORT

      The main functions of the discharge electrode support are to provide
the necessary high voltage  electrical insulation and to give mechanical
support to the discharge electrode frame.

      There are several types of support systems currently used in  precipi-
tator design.  One type is a support insulator with bushings as illustrated in
Figure 10.6.  In this design,  the high voltage insulators are located on the
roof of the precipitator.  A bus beam is mounted on top of the insulators
and the discharge  electrode assembly is suspended from the bus beam by
hanger rods.  Porcelain pin-type insulators support the mechanical  load
of the internal  framework and are  located in  a relatively low temperature
zone  comparatively free of contaminants.  The entrance bushings, commonly
called flower pots, are made of a clay refractory and cemented in place
with a refractory cement.  These bushings are not gas tight, and it is com-
mon practice to provide a flow of air into the insulator compartment to pre-
vent entrance of dust laden air from the precipitator.   This type of arrange-
ment has several inherent disadvantages.

   1.    The refractory bushing is porous and therefore adsorbs
         moisture during low temperature operation.

   2.    It is made in separate pieces  and must be cemented in place.
         Heat is required to dry the joints before it becomes an accep-
         table insulator,  which results in a slow  startup procedure.

   3.    If a positive pressure exists in the precipitator,  the insulator
         compartment must be pressurized to maintain a positive
         pressure in excess of the precipitator pressure at all times.
         This means that there is a flow of air through the open space
         between the hanger support  rod and  the bushing.

   4.    In many instances  the introduction of-air into the treating
         zone of the precipitator can cause disturbance of the
         electrical field with the result that sparking will exist in
         the colder areas.

   5.    The surfaces of the refractory are generally rough and
         difficult to clean.  In many instances,  fly ash precipitators

-------
    H. T* Conductor
    From Rectifier
Insulator
Compartment
 Metal
 H. T.

  Pptr.

L«
i —
^



'nclosed
Bus Due

Roof


-




t


Support Conventional Pin Type
Beam Porcelain Insulator
; 	 ^^ i ; * ' ' : '• ; 1
Air ! I • ' | F^f^ i I
Flow ^t~\ >-T-k ! !
/.. 1- — -i ••.-• i / x / \ i ' \' '-
| . 1 / ..'. v / \ 1 < \ i

, :'! \ ^ ^ / ;!i \
• 	 1 — , 	 \ ^--fe riai | 	 	 1
L^^ T T / •: i






Refractory
Type Entra
Bushing


O

I
                 Hanger
                 Support
      High Temp.- Extreme
      Environmental Zone
                                                                                                              to
                                                                                                              to
                                                                                                              co

                                                                           J   H. T. Discharge
                                                                           -L    Electrode Frame
                                           r    r
                          Figure 10.6.  High Temperature Support Bushings,  Style 1.
-i
n

-------
                                  -229-
        are subject to fume from oil firing.  This fume condenses
        on  the inside of the bushing with moisture and sulfur com-
        pounds,  most of which are relatively conductive and practi-
        cally impossible to remove.

   6.    Another disadvantage of the arrangement in Figure 10. 6
        is that in many instances the  internal operating tempera-
        ture in the insulator compartment is above the safe
        operating temperature of conventional porcelain insulators.
        This  condition is,  as a rule,  relieved by introducing addi-
        tional air or by adding thermal insulation to the floor of
        the compartment.

   7.    In  many processes there are  periods during startup when
        a large quantity of moisture exists in the gas.  During these
        phases,  the  refractory bushing is wet and becomes conduc-
        tive.   To alleviate this condition,  electric or steam heaters
        are installed in the compartment to keep the temperature of
        the bushings above the dew point of the  gases.

Figure 10. 7 illustrates a support bushing arrangement in which  the discharge
electrode  assembly is suspended by hanger rods which are supported directly
by bushings.  In this  case,  the bushings are constructed of alumina or
Pyroceram  and have  higher mechanical strength and better thermal shock
resistance,  permitting a much simpler electrode support design.

      The low porosity of the insulation materials and better gas seal pro-
vided by the gasket minimize the gas inleakage to the insulator compart-
ment.  However, for some applications the bushings are continuously
purged with air,  either induced when the precipitator is under suction or
forced by  blowers.   The bushings are  housed in either individual roof tun-
nels or in a common  housing on top of the precipitator.  There are other
types of electrode support structures in use,  and each manufacturer will
use a different type based upon experience. Most of the types will be some
variation of these basic concepts.
10. 5  COLLECTING ELECTRODES

      Various types of collecting electrode structures have been used in
the plate type precipitator.   The desirable properties are:  (1) that the plate
act as a shield to provide protection of the collected dust and minimize

-------
H. T. Conductor
From Rectifier
    Insulator
    Compartment
Metal Enclosed
 H. T.  Bus Duct

 Pptr. Roof
                                                                 Metal
                                                                 Cover
             Hanger
             Support
f   Pyroceram
    Bushing
         High Temp.  - Extreme
         Environmental Zone
                                                                           i
                                                                           CO
                                                                           u
                                                                                H. T. Discharge
                                                                                Electrode Frame
                                           IT
                            Figure 10.7.  High Temperature Support Bushings, Style 2.

-------
                                    -231-
reentrainment by scouring from the gas stream,  (2) should be free of points
or sharp edges that may cause sparking and reduction in the operating volt-
age, and (3) that the design provide mechanical rigidity.  The latter is also
important from  the  standpoint of transmitting the rapping accelerations to
all parts of the collecting  plate.

      Various types of collecting electrodes are illustrated in Figure  10.8.
This list is by no means exhaustive.  The patent literature  contains numer-
ous other electrode types  which have been prepared to shield the collected
dust and minimize  reentrainment.   Many of these are unacceptable because
of excessive weight or cost.

   Shielded flat  plates.  This type  of collecting electrode is the most popu-
lar in present day use in this country.  The electrode is used chiefly in
horizontal flow,   duct type  precipitators.   The plate proper  consists of
either solid sheet,  expanded metal,or perforated sheet.  In order to shield
the precipitated dust from the gas  passing across the plate, baffles are
mounted along the plate.   The baffles are  fabricated as formed shapes,
and welded to the ends and surfaces of the collecting plate.  Baffle shapes
vary from flat strips perpendicular to  the collecting surface to aerodynamic
designs to minimize gas turbulence.  The size of the collecting electrodes
ranges from 10  feet to 40  feet in height and from 3 feet to 12 feet in the
direction of gas flow.

   Offset plates.  These collecting plates  are made by bending a flat sheet
into a  square or angular zig-zag or a corrugated pattern.  The dust preci-
pitated in the troughs is shielded from the main gas  stream, minimizing
reentrainment.   The plates are usually from 10 feet to 30 feet in height,
and from 3 feet  to 9 feet in the direction of gas flow.

   Pocket plates. As  the  name implies,  these plates are made up by  fabri-
cating pockets or louvers  out of the base sheet.  The plates are arranged
so that the pockets face into the gas stream.   Two plates, spaced about
inches back-to-back, are  employed to make up a collecting electrode
assembly.  The hollow space between the  plates is used as  a chute where-
in the dust collected on the plate can fall down to the hopper out of contact
with the gas stream.  Plates  are from 18  feet to 24 feet high and 6 feet in
the direction of  the gas flow.

-------
                                   -232-
      «	
-------
                                    -233-
   Vee plates.  A vee plate is a composite assembly of metal strips bent in
the shape of a vee or chevron.  The vees are spaced about 1^- inch apart for
the full length of the plate.   The assembled plate is  about 2 inches thick.
The plates are hung so that the points of the vees face upstream.  The spaces
between the vee members act as quiescent zones in  which the dust is preci-
pitated with minimum reentrainment.  The collecting plates in use today
range from about 18 feet to 36 feet in height.  An individual plate  is 3 feet
in the direction of gas flow.   It is customary to fasten two plates together
in order to make up a 6 foot section.

   Rod curtain.  Rod curtain collecting electrodes are solid metal rods
which are hung vertically in a straight line, relatively close together.  Re-
latively large collection areas are thus formed that  are effectively shielded
from the gas stream.   These are very poor aerodynamically and are sub-
ject to high reentrainment losses.   Their  main advantage is the ability to
withstand high  temperatures  (700° to 800° F) without much warping or dis-
tortion.
10.6  ELECTRODE CLEANING EQUIPMENT

      Dust accumulates on both the collection and discharge electrodes and
must be periodically removed for proper operation of the precipitators.  The
requirements for rapping are  discussed in detail in the chapter on rapping
and reentrainment.   Methods of dust removal include impact,  vibration, or
liquid flushing.   For most precipitators, mechanical means are used to
remove the collected dust in the dry state.

   Single impact rapper - (electromagnetic solenoid). Electrostatic sole-
noid rappers consist of a plunger which is  lifted by energizing the solenoid.
On release of the plunger by deenergizing the coil,  it falls against an anvil
which transmits  the rap through a rod to the electrodes to be  cleaned.
Figure  10.9 illustrates the construction.  Solenoid type rappers are used
for both discharge  electrode and collecting electrode cleaning.  They are
mainly  used in connection with horizontal flow, dry type plate precipita-
tors.  When used for plate or  discharge electrode rapping, they are located
on top of the precipitator.

      Solenoid rappers can also be spring actuated as well as gravity actu-
ated,  and in such instances, can be located in other than upright position

-------
                                 -234-
  Conduit Box
Cover and Gaske"
                                                  Plunger Guide

                                                  Coil Cover
                                                  Coil Assembly
             Plunger


             Casing Gaskets


             Flange Bolts and Nuts

             Lower Casing

             Adjusting Nuts

4ff*	Adjusting Bolt
             Adapter or Mounting
                                                  Rapper Rod
        Figure 10.9.  Typical Electromagnetic Rapper Assembly.
                                               SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -235-
on the side or end for plate rapping.   Control consists of varying the elec-
trical energy, which changes the magnitude of the impulse,  or the frequency
of rapping.  Final selection of magnitude and frequency is usually made
after trials  in the actual plant under  operating conditions.   The accelera-
tion of the rap can be as low as 5 g's, but raps from 30 g's to 50 g's are
required for most fly ash precipitators.

   Vibrators (electromagnetic).  Electromagnetic vibrators consist of a bal-
anced, spring loaded armature suspended between two synchronized electro-
magnetic  coils.   When energized, the armature vibrates at a high frequency.
This vibrating energy is transmitted through a rapper rod to the electrodes
and also collecting electrodes.  When employed for discharge electrode
cleaning,  the rapper rod is provided with an electrical insulating section
in order to isolate the high voltage electrode charge from ground.  This
device is  used mainly in the vertical position for discharge  electrode clean-
ing and is suitable for both horizontal and vertical flow dry  type precipita-
tors.   Control consists of  varying the electrical energy input, which changes
the amplitude of vibrations,  the operation time duration, and the frequency
of vibration. The armature must be adjusted  for the operating position
required. Figure 10.10 is a typical  electromagnetic vibrator installation.

   Vibrators (eccentrically unbalanced motors).  Mechanical vibrators con-
sist of an electric motor equipped with adjustable cam weights mounted on
a single shaft or on both shafts of a double ended motor.  When operated,
the eccentrically positioned cam weights set the entire assembly into vibra-
tion.  The motor is mounted directly on the rapper shaft which transmits
the generated vibration to  the electrodes to be cleaned.

      Vibrators are used for both discharge electrode and collecting elec-
trode cleaning.  They are  used mainly in connection with horizontal-flow,  dry-
type plate precipitators.  This type of rapper  is used for either top, side,
or end operation.  Control consists of varying the degree of eccentricity
by cam weight adjustment, the length of time operated, and the frequency
of operation.

   Single  impact (motor-driven cams).  This rapping system is usually
used to clean dry-type horizontal flow precipitators.  The mechanism
consists of a motor-driven shaft running horizontally across the precipi-
tator.  Cams are located along the shaft which raise small hammers by
their handles.  When the rotating cam reaches the end of its lobe, the

-------
                             -236-
                     Enclosure
                     Quick Opening
                     Clamp
Ground Connection
       Clamps
   (Rapper Rods to
   Ceramic Shaft)
        Precipitator R oof
        Dust Laden   Vibratiorf :
        Gas Area
    To
Discharge
   Wire
                                            J
                          Enclosure

                          Vibrator

                          Mounting Plate

                          Stuffing Box and Guide

                          Flexible Conduit

                          Conduit Fitting

                          Housing



                          Ceramic Insulating Shaft


                          Closure Plate

                          High Voltage Bushing
Rapper Rod Assembly,
Must Be Plumb

Anvil
                                                High Tension Frame

                                                Discharge Wires

   Figure 10.10.  Typical Electromagnetic Vibrator Assembly.
                                               SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -237-
hammer swings downward, striking an anvil located on the end of a single
collecting electrode.  The cam shaft can be located at any height along the
plate ends.  Rapping control is limited to adjustment of operating time
and shaft speed.

   Single impact (motor-driven swing hammers).  This rapping system is
limited to collecting electrode cleaning of dry type horizontal flow preci-
pitators.  The mechanism consists of a shaft running horizontally across
the precipitator between banks of collecting plates.  The shaft is oscillated
by a motor-driven mechanical linkage.  Hammer heads are connected to
the shaft by spring leaf arms.  The hammers  strike against anvils attached
to the ends of all collecting plates.  The  striking anvils are located near
the bottom of the plates.   The rapping blow can be varied by adjusting the
arc of the hammer swing.  Further control is obtained by operating time.

   Single impact mechanical rappers.  The mechanical arrangement for a
mechanically actuated impact-type rapper is illustrated in Figure 10. 11.
The system consists of a cam shaft running across the precipitator.  The
cams located along the shaft engage the cam disc and raise the hammer
rods.  The hammer rods are released when the cams reach the end of
their lobes and fall under gravitational forces, striking an anvil which
is attached to the support structure of the electrodes being rapped.  The
system of rapping can be used on both discharge and  collection electrodes.
Rapping control is limited to operating time and shaft speed.
        «
      A variation of the mechanical rapper system is the  use of swing
hammers to provide the impact.  These can be located on the sides or
ends of precipitator as well as on the top.

   Vibrators  (air).  The major components of a typical vibrator consist
of a reciprocating piston in a sleeve type cylinder.  The valve is of the
centrally located pin type.  The vibrator assembly is fastened directly
to the end of a rapper rod which transmits the rapping energy to the
electrodes to be cleaned.  This device is used for both discharge elec-
trode (employing an insulating section of rod) and collecting  electrode
cleaning.  This type of rapper is used for both horizontal and vertical
flow, dry type precipitators.  For collecting electrodes,  the vibrators
can be used for either top, side,  or end  rapping since they operate in any
position.  For discharge electrode cleaning they are  usually used as top
rappers.  Control consists of varying the air pressure, the duration of

-------
                        -238-
                                   Roller Lever Kicks Free
                                   When it Passes This Line
                                         Roller
                                                Lever - Loose
                                                 On Shaft
                Driver- Keyed
                 To Shaft
To Collection Plates
     Figure 10.11.
Mechanical Single Impact Rapper.  Plates Are
Raised and Dropped by the Action of the Rapper.
Impact of the Plates in the Guide Supplies
Rapping Force.
                                         SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -239-
the rapping period, and the time elapsed between cleaning.

   Water flush and liquid removal.  Some electrostatic precipitators are used
to precipitate mists from the gas stream.   Most of these applications are
found in chemical,  petroleum,  and paper plants.  The mist droplets which
collect on electrodes  run together to form larger droplets, and then run down
the electrode surface where they drain away.  In some cases,  water or other
liquid is introduced at the top of the electrode to improve mist removal.l
Tube electrodes are more adaptable than plates or rods for this application.2
Because these  electrodes do not require rapping, they can be made thinner,
but may need to be fabricated from corrosion resistant material.
10.7  HOPPER SYSTEMS

      Hoppers are used to collect and store dry precipitate which is removed
from  the electrodes.  The physical properties and quantity of the dust must
be considered when designing hoppers.  Heaters are sometimes  required to
prevent moisture condensation and caking of the dust.  The outlet and slope
of the sides must allow the dust to be removed adequately.  If hoppers are
allowed to overflow, collected dust will be reentrained in the gas thereby
greatly reducing precipitator efficiency.   Baffles are frequently placed in
hoppers to minimize undesirable gas flows which may reentrain  dusts.

      If the precipitator system is operated with internal pressures less
than ambient atmospheric, then air inleakage through the hopper can cause
a reentrainment of the dust from the hoppers.  Care must be taken to pro-
vide good seals around  hopper doors and dust removal connections for
systems operating under partial vacuum conditions.
10. 8  DUST REMOVAL SYSTEMS

   Container removal.  This system is used on small installations collect-
ing dry material in a. hopper.   The hoppers are usually of the conical or
pyramidal type.  The system consists of placing a transportable container
below the hopper.  The collected material stored in the hopper is transferred
to the container through a simple manual valve or slide gate.  When filled,
the container is removed  for emptying.  In some instances  the container is
embodied as part of a truck.

-------
                                  -240-
   Dry vacuum systems.  In this system, dry bulk material is transferred
from a precipitator hopper to a transport pipe system which is under vacuum.
The material is metered from the hopper to the transport system through
automatic rotary feeder valves or dump valves.  The system vacuum is
developed by an air pump. In order to  maintain system fluidity,  ambient
air or hopper gas is induced as a carrier. The pump discharges the dust
into a silo for storage.

   Wet vacuum systems.  In this system, dry dust is removed from  a pre-
cipitator hopper into a transport pipe system which is maintained under
vacuum by a water aspirator. The collected dust or ash is metered from
the hopper into the transport system through automatic feeder valves or
dump valves.  In order to keep the dust suspended in the gas carrier, am-
bient air or additional hopper gas  is induced into the transport line.  The
dry material being transported mixes with the water used for aspiration
and forms a slurry.   From this  point the  water-dust mixture is run to
waste.

   Screw conveyors.  A screw conveyor system usually starts  with an open
screw in the bottom of a trough type hopper which moves the dry  dust to the
outside.  At the turns in the system each screw run passes the dust on to
each successive screw by a gravity drop.  The dust is moved on to a system
silo or directly to some mobile conveyance.  A screw conveyor system is
also applicable with a conical or pyramidal type hopper.  A rotary  valve is
required when the system is  operating under vacuum.

   Scraper bottom.  The precipitator hopper is a flat bottom pan.  An end-
less belt type scraper moves the collected dust to one end where  a  screw
conveyor is located.  The screw moves the dust out of the hopper.  Once
outside,  the dust is conveyed to  some remote point by any form of system
such as container removal,  vacuum, or screw.
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -241-
                              CHAPTER 10
                            BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.  Strauss, W.,  Industrial Gas Cleaning, Per gam on Press, Long Island
   City, New York (1966).

2.  White, H. J., Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation. Addison-Wesley,
   Reading,  Massachusetts  (1963).

3.  Rose,  H. E. and Wood, A.  J., An Introduction to Electrostatic.
   Precipitation in Theory and Practice, Constable and Company,
   London (1966).

-------
                                   -242-
                             .  CHAPTER 11
                    POWER SUPPLIES AND CONTROLS
      The fundamental driving force that removes the dust from a gas
stream in electrostatic precipitators is that between an electric field and
a charged dust particle.  Therefore, the electric field in the vicinity of
the collection electrode should be maintained as high as practical in order
to provide the maximum possible gas cleaning efficiency.  The function of
the power supply and related control system (power pack) is to provide
optimum voltage and current conditions.

11.1  THE POWER SYSTEM

      The power supply system consists of four components as shown in
Figure 11.1:  a step-up transformer,  a high voltage rectifier, a control
element, and a driving function or sensor for the control  system.  The
step-up transformer is required because the voltage levels for modern
precipitators can range from about 30 to 100 kV.

      The high voltage rectifier is required to convert the high voltage
ac power to varying direct current to be compatible with the electrostatic
precipitator  requirements.

      One function of the  control system is to vary the amplitude of the
dc voltage that is to be applied to the electrode system.  This control
can be applied to either the primary or the secondary circuit in the
power supply, but it is customarily utilized in the primary or low voltage
side.   The control system can be operated either manually or in one  of
several automatic modes. Automatic control systems are typically in-
stalled in all modern commercial installations.  A well-designed auto-
matic control system serves to maintain the voltage level at the optimum
value,  even when the dust characteristics and  concentration exhibit
dynamic behavior.

   High voltage  generation.  Techniques for generating high voltage include
the use of frictional types of high voltage machines, such as the Van  de
Graff generator,  high frequency transformer,  and the standard iron  core
voltage transformer.  Both the frictional type  generator and the high fre-
quency transformers are  too limited in current capacity for practical
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
LOW-VOLTAGE

POWER IN  -»
CONTROL
ELEMENT
t '
MANUAL
CONTROL


STEP- UP
TRANSFORMER
AUTOMATIC
CONTROL



HI-VOLTAGE
RECTIFIER

SENSOR FOR
AUTOMATIC
CONTROL
ELECTRO-
	 ASTATIC l
JPRECIPITATOR ]



                                                                                                       i
                                                                                                       to
                                                                                                       •*»•
                                                                                                       CO
                Figure 11.1.  The Power Supply System for Modern Precipitators.

-------
                                   -244-
commercial precipitators, hence, the conventional high voltage power trans-
former is universally used as a means for converting the normal power line
voltage to the values required for precipitator operation.

   High voltage rectifiers.  The high voltage rectifying equipment has passed
through several stages of evolution to reach its present stage of development.
The invention of the synchronous-mechanical rectifier in  1904 by Lemp1 and
utilized by Cottrell in 1907 was the first means for providing sufficient power
at high voltage so that electrostatic precipitation became  feasible.  In this
system,   a high voltage alternating current is fed to a rotating spark gap
that is driven in synchronism with the applied ac power.   The phasing-of the
spark timer is such that ac is converted to pulsating dc.   A schematic dia-
gram of the  mechanical rectifier, included primarily for  historical purposes,
is shown  in Figure 11. 2.

       Point A lines up with Point 1 when Point 1 is at a positive voltage.  As
the sine wave changes to where Point 1 becomes negative, the rotor turns to
align Point B with Point 1 so that the output always maintains a voltage of
the same polarity.  It is imperative that the rotational speed of the spark gap
maintain  synchronism with the driving voltage.
                                                                      A
       Shortly after the development of the synchronous rectifier, Lodge in
England patented the use of mercury vapor rectifiers.  However, high volt-
age rectifier tubes were not used commercially until 1920.

       The first nonrotating (static) power supply utilizing rectifier tubes was
installed  in the early 1920's.  Copper oxide  rectifiers3 were utilized in about
1928. Selenium rectifiers were introduced about 1939.  These devices, with
significantly smaller electrical losses, allowed the development of static
power supplies that were  economically competitive with the mechanical unit.
A diagram of the static rectifying system is shown in Figure 11. 3 where
either vacuum tubes or  diodes act as the  rectifying element.

       More recent rectifier developments include high-voltage,  high-efficiency
vacuum tube and single-crystal silicon rectifiers.  The silicon rectifiers are
currently the most widely used for new installations  since they provide high
conversion efficiency and high reliability.

   Voltage control.  In the normal operating range, the transformer is linear,
so that the output  voltage is directly proportional to the input voltage.   The
output voltage  can therefore be controlled by changing the voltage input to the
1 Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -245-
          O
Low Voltage
ac Input
              High Voltage
              Transformer
                                                            Synchronous
                                                            Motor - 4 Pole
                                       C\ \         _      Precipitato
                                       i jl>-»- PVV./V	O	   	
                                                 High Voltag
                                                 dc _O utp ut
 Note:  Motor and transformer connected
        to same electrical source.
Figure 11.2.  Full-Wave Mechanical Rectifier H-V Power Supply.

-------
                       -246-
AC INPUT POWER
                                           DC OUTPUT
      Figure 11.3.  Vacuum Tube Rectifier.
                                          SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -247-
transformer.  Some common techniques for voltage control include tapped
series dropping resistors,  series rheostats, tapped transformer primaries,
variable inductances or solid state control devices.  Some installations use
combinations of control elements where gross voltage control is accom-
plished by tapped devices and continuously variable devices such as rheo-
stats or inductances provide the fine control.  Some of the more modern
control devices include saturable reactors (magnetic devices), silicon con-
trolled rectifiers (SCR), and thyristors (four-element, solid-state devices).
The reactive control elements in general lead to a more efficient power con-
version subsystem than do the resistive ones.

      The  current limiting function is necessary to avoid catastrophic fail-
ure of the  power supply under arcing conditions. When an arc exists be-
tween the corona wire and the collection electrode, the ionized path con-
stitutes essentially a short circuit across the power supply.  Without a
means for current limiting,  excessive current will flow which will lead to
a catastrophic failure  of the power supply.  This protection can be provided
by a variety of devices including resistors,  various combinations of reactive
elements or active devices in the control subsystem.

      The  signal to the control device determines the operational charac-
teristics of the power  supply so  long as the design of the overall system
is sufficient to provide the needed capability.  This control signal can range
from a simple manual setting of a passive device (tapped element) to a dy-
namic control signal related to current, voltage, spark rate,  or combina-
tion of these.  The shortcomings of manual control became evident early in
the period of commercial application to precipitators.   The volt age-current
characteristics of the  precipitator are related to the dust concentration and
composition.  Extremely heavy dust  loads tend to quench the corona current
in the input section of  the unit and high resistivity dusts lead to  increased
voltage drops in the deposit layer, with the result that excessive sparking,
back  corona, or simply poor collection efficiency occurs.  Therefore,  the
need  for dynamic control becomes obvious.

      Various combinations of the above parameters (voltage-current-
spark rate) have been  utilized in power supply automatic controls,  but the
predominant one currently used  in this country is spark rate together with
a current limit.   The spark rate control establishes the applied voltage at
a point  where a fixed number of  sparks occur per minute (typically 50-150
per corona section).  The spark rate is a function of the applied voltage
for a given set of precipitator conditions.   The higher the voltage,  the

-------
                                   -248-
greater the spark rate.  As the spark rate increases, a greater percentage
of the input power is wasted in the spark current, and consequently less
useful power is applied to dust collection.  Thus, the spark rate control
should be designed to maintain the precipitator at or near the optimum oper-
ating point.  The optimum conditions correspond to the highest time average
voltage  on the precipitator.

      As the dust conditions and concentration change,  sparking conditions
change.  Specifically,  a highly resistive dust can cause sparking to occur
at a lower than normal applied voltage (this is discussed in detail in the
section on particle collection).  The automatic spark rate control adjusts
the applied voltage downward  to bring the collector  into a more efficient
operating range if high dust resistivity is encountered.

      The  spark rate control  senses voltage  or current surges caused by
the sparks.  A schematic diagram of one type of spark rate control is
shown in Figure 11.4.  The operation of the  circuit is as follows:  the cur-
rent surge in the primary circuit,  associated with a spark in the secondary,
is sensed by the detector.  This signal fires the  thyraton V1 which discharges
capacitor Cj. When V^ is turned off,  capacitor Cj charges through Rx apply-
ing a voltage across the series combination of R2 and C2-  Thus, with con-
tinual sparking,  a voltage is developed across C2 which is proportional to
the spark rate of the unit.  C2 tends to discharge through resistor R3 gen-
erating a signal Vs on the plate of diode V2.

      A reference signal V^ that opposes Vs is developed by voltage divider
R4 across battery B that is connected in series opposition to Vs.  These
two voltages are compared at the  diode where an increasing voltage signal
is developed across R5 until Vs just exceeds V]-, where the circuit estab-
lishes equilibrium.  A detailed description of this circuit is given by Van
Hoe sen. 4

      In the case where the dust conditions are such that no sparking
occurs, the voltage or current will increase up to the maximum capability
of the power supply.  In this case it may be necessary to  include a maxi-
mum voltage or current limiter to avoid damage to the power supply.

   Sectionalization.  It has been experimentally determined that the  over-
all collection efficiency of a spark rate limited installation can be  improved
by increasing the number of independently powered electrical sections
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
FROM
HI-VOLTAGE  -
TRANSFORMER
SPARK
DETECTOR
                                            B+
-wVVW.
                                  T Y-
                                 _L_L_-x' +
                                                   TO CONTROLLER
                                                                                              CO
                 Figure 11.4.  Spark Rate Control Circuit from Van Hoesen, et al.

-------
                                 -250-
(corona) in the precipitator.5

      The spark rate in an electrostatic precipitator as given by White6
follows an exponential relationship as shown below.

                    S  =  expb (Vp - Vi)                         (11.1)

where

      S = spark rate sparks/min,
      b = empirical constant,
     Vp = peak voltage, and
     Vj = initiation voltage (voltage for one spark per minute).

      Thus, as the applied voltage increases above V1; the spark rate
increases accordingly.  This increase in voltage leads to two conflicting
effects.  First, the increased voltage increases the charge and electric
field in the precipitator, which  tends to increase the collection efficiency.
But, in contrast to this, a spark tends to short circuit the power supply
and reduce the collection efficiency for the duration of the spark.   The
overall effect of these two factors is shown in Figure 11. 5, where  the
maximum efficiency occurs at a spark rate of about 125 per min.   This
discussion specifically applies to a precipitator operating from a single
power supply where one spark short circuits the entire collector unit.

      Next,  consider a similar  situation where two independent power
supplies are used,  each supplying only one half of the  collection area.
The sparking condition for the entire precipitator will still follow the
same spark rate equation above, but a spark will now  disable only  one-
half of the precipitator. In this case, two  sparks will be required  to be
as detrimental as  one was in the original example,  which leads to an
effective spark rate of about 250 per minute.  A further increase to ten
electrical sections will similarly raise the overall effective spark  rate
to 1250.   This  increased spark  rate will occur at a significantly higher
applied voltage than the original single section case.

      A numerical  example will serve to show the changes in  applied
voltage to be expected.  Consider the  case  where spark initiation occurs
at an applied voltage  of 33 kV and a spark rate of 125 per min occurs
at an average voltage of 42 kV.   Substitution into Equation 11. 1 yields
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                   -251-
         bO
         cti
50
             40
         (8 >
             30
             20
                Optimum Point
                      i   1   i   i
               0    100   200   300
               No.  of Sparks/min


Figure 11. 5.  Optimum Operating Voltage for Single Section
              of a Precipitator (Reference 7).
                                 Req
                     -L Ceq
                           I
Figure 11. 6.  Equivalent Circuit of the Precipitator
              Collection Electrode System.

-------
                                  -252-
          S = expb (Vp - V;)                                        (11.2)

        125 = exp[D(42 - 33)] =  exp (9b)

          b = g-  In 125 =  0.536

The voltage required for a spark rate of 250 per min yields a value for the
peak voltage of


         VT  ln  s + vi
which for S = 250 yields

         V  =10.3 +  33 =  43.3  kV

and similarly for S  =  1250

         Vp = 13.3 +33 = 46.3 kV

Thus, the effect of the increased sectionalization is seen to lead to a signi-
ficant increase in the applied voltage,  which generally leads to increased
collection efficiency.

      In addition  to the sparking effect,  increased sectionalization tends to
isolate portions of the precipitator with mechanical defects  such as broken
or misaligned wires, and misaligned collection electrodes or other factors
that tend to cause a reduction in the operating voltage of localized sections.

      A further advantage of sectionalization of the precipitator power sup-
ply is the higher  internal impedance associated with the smaller capacity
power supplies.  Higher impedance tends to limit the  current and minimize
the tendency for power arcs  to develop.

      The precipitator constitutes a capacitive load and the  energy stored
in the precipitator depends upon the capacitance of the section and the volt-
age to which it is charged.

      If a spark occurs within a precipitator,  the energy stored in the pre-
cipitator due to its capacitance tends to sustain the spark for a given time.
However,  the current  drain during a spark is heavy relative to normal
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -253-
current flow from the power supply,  and the spark would tend to be quenched
when the energy from the precipitator has been dissipated in the spark.

      However,  if the power supply impedance is low, the power supply volt-
age can supply a sustaining value of current while the arc is maintained.
Consequently, the precipitator capacitance may not be completely discharged
during the interval that the power supply voltage reaches its minimum value.
In such case, the spark would not be extinguished and a  condition known as
a power arc  would develop.  The current limit on the power supply normally
quenches  a power arc; however, considerable disruption of the precipitator
occurs during the period of the arc.  Low  impedance power supplies are not
as effective in spark quenching and power  arcs can develop more frequently
than in precipitators powered by high impedance supplies.

   Waveform selection.  Electrostatic precipitation theory shows that the
collection efficiency is fundamentally related to two factors:  the charge on
the dust particles and the average value of the electric field in the collection
zone.  The charge on the particles is related to the  peak value of the elec-
tric field  in the charging region (field charging).  The basis for the  selection
of the waveform should take these factors  into consideration.

      There  are several choices of waveform including:   pure dc, half-wave
and full-wave rectification and pulsed supplies.  Pure dc is seldom,  if ever,
used, primarily because of its poor spark quenching characteristics.

      In general, half-wave power supplies provide  a greater degree of sec-
tionalization, although the sections are not completely independent,  since con-
trol is normally associated with the transformer primary.  Full-wave recti-
fication is used where higher average currents are required, as for example,
where large  dust loading or extremely fine particles lead to a large space
charge which limits current flow.

      The effect of the voltage waveform on precipitator operation can be
seen from the equivalent circuit, Figure 11.6.

      The dust layer constitutes a distributed capacitance,  the magnitude of
which is given by Qj = e e0 where e =  relative dielectric constant and e0 =
permittivity  of free  space  and a resistance,  given by the dust resistivity p .
The effect of this combination is to provide a filtering action to the buildup
of voltage which results in a delay in the voltage appearing across the dust

-------
                                  -254-
layer.  The higher the dust resistivity and the greater the dust capacitance,
the greater the delay in charging.  Thus,  for a time varying applied voltage,
the voltage appearing across the dust layer will in effect be filtered and will
not follow the swing of the applied voltage.

      The parallel capacitance Ceq constitutes  the distributed capacitance
of the precipitator due to the electrodes.  The large area represented by
the collection surface and the discharge wires can lead to an appreciable
capacitance.  If the wires are  assumed to be a plate, the capacitance due
to the geometry can be  calculated from

                    r    - e°A
                     e(l "  d
where £c = permittivity of free space,  A = plate area,  d = distance between
electrodes.  For a 10 cm plate-to-wire spacing and 1500 m2 of plate area,
the capacitance would be

                    Ceq= 8. 85x10^x1500 =  0.126uF


In practice, the capacitance must be around half this value for the given
dimensions due to the effect of the discharge wires.

      The equivalent resistance of the  precipitator  can be computed from

                    Req = T
For a precipitator of 1500 rn2 plate area,  a current of 400 mA at an applied
voltage of 40 kV would be  typical.  For these conditions

                    R      _40_kV_    = 100xl03ohms
                     eq   400 mA
This equivalent resistance is not a constant  since the voltage-current rela-
tionships in the corona systems are not linear. However,  as a final approx-
imation, the assumption of a constant resistance will serve to illustrate
the operating conditions.

      The time required for the charging  and discharging of the capacitance
represented by the equivalent circuit is determined by the value of the capa-
citance and resistance.  The time constant can be  computed from T =  RC =
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -255-
(0.126 x 10'6 x 100 x 103)  = 12. 6 x 10'3 sec,  which means that about 12. 6
 milliseconds would be required for the charge in the capacitance to reach
 63% of its final value if a steady dc voltage is applied.

       Since the normal voltage source is a time varying one, the effective
 voltage applied to the precipitator electrodes would be a function of the
 applied voltage waveform and the precipitator impedance.  Figure 11.7
 shows the precipitator voltage resulting from a 60 Hz half-wave and full-
 wave  supply and a 500 Hz pulsed voltage supply.   The waveforms were
 computed on the basis of the equivalent circuit of Figure 11.6 and the values
 of capacitance and resistance given above.

       As indicated ip Figure 11.7, the capacitance of the precipitator main-
 tains the applied voltage at some minimum value even though the applied
 voltage would go to zero for a half cycle in the absence of the precipitator
 capacitance.

       The 500 Hz pulse power supply indicates the effect of the higher fre-
 quency.  Since  charging current is applied more frequently, the resultant
 precipitator voltage approaches that of a dc voltage.

       Studies of the effect of waveform have shown that higher peak voltage
 can be applied before sparkover if the voltage rise rate is rapid. It can be
 shown from the equivalent circuit that the integrating effect of the dust
 layer prevents  the voltage across it from  rising as rapidly as the applied
 voltage.  Consequently, since sparking is related to  the electric field at
 the dust surface,  a higher peak voltage can be applied before sparking occurs.

       In general,  the value of the peak voltage determines the maximum
 charge on a particle in the field charging mode.  For optimum  collection,
 the product of the average and maximum field should be as high as possible.
 This condition would be met by  a rapid voltage rise rate.

       However, the particle charge rate is also a very significant variable
 in terms of precipitator performance.  Pulse type power supplies must
 provide sufficient pulse width for the particles to  acquire their charge and
 this requirement  tends to limit the effectiveness of pulse power supplies.

   The practical high voltage  power supply.   The practical aspects  of power
 supply requirements place additional requirements on the designer.  The

-------
      100
O


I


i
m
1
-i


PI
       80
     
     flS
     u
     0)
       60
     0}
       40
       20
0
                                               500 pps
                                               500 fi sec
                                                          Corona

                                                          *  Quench
                  \                 x     \ Full Wave

                     •100 pps -      \

                       \ SOOjusec      .


                          \
4

                                                                            1
                                                                                        I
                                                                               14
                                                                                                  16
            2          4           0          3          U

                                      Time, milliseconds


Figure 11.7.  Time Response of the Precipitator Equivalent Circuit to Various Voltage Waveforms

              With the Same Peak Amplitude.
                                                                                                             to
                                                                                                             m
                                                                                                             OS
                                                                                                             I

-------
                                 -257-
various alternative techniques for fulfilling these requirements provide
some insight into the problems facing the designer of a precipitator power
supply.

    H-V transformers

      H-V transformers for precipitation rectifiers are conservatively
designed and ruggedly constructed to withstand high average ambient tem-
peratures and continuously occurring electrical transients due to precipi-
tator sparking.

      The high voltage and power level requirements are best satisfied by
liquid-immersed,  self-cooled designs.  The insulating and cooling liquid
is usually transformer grade  mineral oil.  In some instances fire insur-
ance regulations dictate  use of nonflammable oil (Askarel).  The  latter
material is  expensive and requires special insulation system designs be-
cause of its electrical dielectric and solvent properties.  Transformers
50 kVA and  larger require extended cooling surfaces, in the form of con-
vectors, to  maintain low temperature rise.

      The shell-type,  single-phase transformer core and coil arrangement
is normally used.  Stacked cut core designs  are common and in some in-
stances tape-wound  (cut  "c") cores are used.  The L-V primary winding
is placed adjacent to the core and the H-V secondary winding is placed
over the primary winding.   Though a single-layer-type secondary wind-
ing can be used, it is advantageous to use  two coils,  which can be arranged
to minimize electrical stress on the primary-secondary insulation.
Numerous oil ducts  are included in both primary and secondary windings
to minimize thermal gradients and assure thorough impregnation. Surge
screens are used at  both ends of the secondary  winding for protection
against transient voltages.  A grounded electrostatic shield between pri-
mary and secondary windings is  useful for minimizing radio interference
caused by precipitator corona and sparking.   The core and coil structures
also require adequate structural bracing to withstand mechanical stresses
and shocks induced by precipitator short circuits and sparkover.

    Mechanical rectifiers

      Figures 11.2 and 11.8 illustrate  typical FW and HW rectifier arrange-
ments.  The rotors  are driven by an 1800 RPM synchronous motor and,

-------
          Low Voltage
          ac Input
in
O
c

1*1
2
a
                              High Voltage
                              Transformer
                                                                                          Precipitator
                                                   Synchronous Motor
                                                       4 Pole
                                                                          High Voltage
                                                                          dc Output
                                                                                                                  i
                                                                                                                  (S3
                                                                                                                  Ol
                                                                                                                  00
                                                                                                                  I
                     Note:  Motor and transformer connected
                            to same electrical source.
                     Figure 11,8.  Half-Wave Mechanical Rectifier H.-V Power Supply.
n



I
H
H
PI

-------
                                  -259-
in effect,  alternately switch H-V transformer connections to the precipitator
once each half-cycle.   In the HW rectifier,  the second rotor essentially dis-
tributes alternate pulses to two precipitator sections.  Because of high tip
velocities, a small gap (~£") is needed between the rotor tips and arc shoes.
These gaps (4 in series for FW and 6 in series for HW) introduce substantial
voltage and power losses in the system,  particularly when clearance increases
to -|" or -g" due  to tip burning.  The intense electrical discharge in these gaps
generates toxic gases,  heat,  and radio interference radiation.  The former
are dissipated  by special ventilating systems, and the latter by grounded en-
closures and radio interference  chokes  and filters.  Quite often resistors (4K
to 10K) are placed in the H-V rectifier leads to reduce severity of precipitator
sparking transients.

      These rectifiers  are often driven  with 3-phase reluctance-type syn-
chronous  motors of approximately 1 HP.  These  motors are essentially
squirrel cage induction motors with  salient poles  milled in the rotor.  Since
these rotors do not have fixed magnetic polarity,   special polarity sensing
and transformer polarity reversing contractors are needed to insure nega-
tive H-V output.  In the more modern designs permanent magnets were in-
corporated in the rotor structure.  This change eliminated the special polar-
ity controls and improved motor performance.

    Electron tube rectifiers

      Figure 11. 9 illustrates the single-phase bridge commonly used for
FW and HW energization.  It will be appreciated that electron tube rectifiers
offer  considerable practical improvement over the mechanical rectifier in
regard to electrical efficiency, noise, toxic gases,  lack of moving parts,
fixed  polarity,  and size.

      The principal  disadvantages are tube replacement  costs, need for
filament power, and some X-ray radiation.  X-ray radiation is seldom a
problem because it is soft and easily shielded by the steel rectifier en-
closure provided for weather and H-V hazard protection.  The filament
power is provided by one or more small filament transformers which are
oil immersed with the H-V transformer.

      Tungsten filament tubes provide tube life of from 10, 000 to 20, 000
hours, by operating at  a filament voltage just sufficient to satisfy the peak
current requirements.  Inherent current limitations of these tubes preclude

-------
                 High Voltage

                 Transformer
    Low Voltage

    ac Input
                                                              High Voltage

                                                              dc Output
01
o


X
m
    Filament Circuit

    ac Input	
                Filament Transformer
                                                                                   Precipitator
            O
                                                                                                               CO
                                                                                                               o»
                                                                                                               o
X
n
x



1
                                         Figure 11.9.  Tube Rectifier H-V Power Supply.

-------
                                   -261-
their use in rectifiers larger than 750 mA if reasonably long life is to be
obtained.  In most energization systems means are included to insure a one
minute tube filament warmup before application of H-V and quite often volt-
age stabilizers are provided to closely regulate filament voltage.

     Silicon rectifiers

      In 1956, application of silicon rectifier elements to precipitation rec-
tifiers quickly followed general commercial availability  of the basic  silicon
devices.  Rectifier failures were common at first, but have been essentially
eliminated by appropriate design criteria and uniformity of rectifier junction
manufacture.

      Series strings  of rectifier junctions are used as arms in single-phase
bridge rectifier connection.  Depending upon the characteristics of the  rec-
tifier junctions, transient voltage distribution is accomplished along the
string by either resistance, capacitor,  or res is tor-capacitor  networks. With
development of the "avalanche  diode, "  it is sometimes possible to obtain
adequate transient voltage distribution solely through avalanche voltage limit-
ing without resorting to a compensating network.  The rectifier legs are com-
posed of a sufficient  number of 500 to 1200-V rectifier cells,  each rated for
approximately 1A average current.  These cells are mounted  on insulating
boards with provision for simple  connection  in the circuit.  It is general
practice to immerse the silicon rectifier assemblies with the  H-V trans-
former.   This provides a compact package and an ideal ambient for the H-V
elements.  The insulating fluid can be either transformer oil or Askarel.  In
case of Askarel, a rectifier failure generally produces sufficient contamina-
tion to also ruin the H-V transformer.  In most cases, air core inductors are
included in the dc output leads of  silicon rectifiers. These chokes serve to
reduce severity of the precipitator sparking transients on the  rectifier assem-
bly by slowing voltage and current wavefronts.

      H-V silicon rectifier assemblies  have not been specified and typed
like the H-V rectifier tubes.  This is largely due to differences in recti-
fier junction manufacture and specialty of the precipitation rectifier ap-
plication.  As previously mentioned,  several H-V rectifier modules are
available and are  used to replace mechanical and tube rectifiers.  In  gen-
eral, these assemblies are for lower current sets,  500 mA or less.

-------
                                  -262-
    Description of L-V control components

      Manually operated rheostats were used as a variable series impedance
means to vary energization levels in early electrical sets.  In general, the
control range was quite limited and also directly related to precipitator cur-
rent requirements.  This control situation was helped somewhat by use of
primary taps on the H"-V transformer and a tap switch which  essentially
changed the transformation ratio.

      Power rheostats similar to field rheostats with cast iron grids were
common.  In some cases more modern strip or ribbon resistance elements
were used in conjunction with power tap switches to vary resistance.  Suit-
able resistance values ranged from 1 to 8 ohms depending upon  current levels
and power losses could run as high  as 15 to 18  kW.  The rheostats were con-
structed so  that 20 to 40% of the total resistance was always in the circuit
as ballast.  This ballast performed the essential function of spark quenching.

     Tapped input autotransformer

      Use of tapped input autotransformers provides true voltage control at
moderate  costs.  These arrangements often have a control range of ^50%
and permit relatively close adjustment by means of coarse and fine voltage
tap switches. Operation of the tap switches momentarily de-energizes the
system—generating transient electrical surges and often puffs from the pre-
cipitator.   Ballast  resistors are also incorporated for spark quenching.

     Variable autotransformer

      Variable autotransformers either manually or motor operated provide
true voltage control without the circuit interruption of tap switching.  Motor
operated units also provide means to automatically raise and lower voltage
in accordance with relay controls.  These assemblies are prone to commu-
tation difficulties,  particularly when the brush  remains stationary at one
point on the winding for long periods of sparking operation.  The usual volt-
age control  range is = 50% for precipitation rectifier control.

     Induction regulator

      The induction voltage regulator is essentially a variable transformer
wherein secondary voltage is varied by changing magnetic flux linkages
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -263-
between primary and secondary windings.  Its construction is similar to a
wound rotor induction motor with a blocked rotor whose angular position
can be varied to change magnetic coupling.  It is usually connected in auto-
transformer fashion with the  stator winding in shunt with the load and the
rotor winding in series with the load.  These regulators are usually  motor
operated, and hence adaptable to automatic control systems.  Though
rugged, and the most expensive of the three voltage control means,  these
regulators are also vulnerable  to precipitator sparking. In this case,
sparking transients cause rapid wear of the gear drive  train resulting in
noisy operation and jamming.   The usual voltage control range is =*  50%.

    Saturable reactor

      The saturable core reactor provides a good means of control.  Load
power is controlled in accord with the dc current supplied  to the control
winding.  Since control is accomplished by electrical signal, the saturable
reactor is well-adapted for continuously controlled  automatic systems.  It
is a static device and can be designed to provide long life under all sorts
of electrical abuse.

      Both full-range and partial-range reactors are used for power control
purposes.  The partial range reactor arrangements usually require fixed
resistance in the primary circuit to limit short-circuit currents.  With high-
gain,  full-range reactor designs,  it is possible to combine the power control,
ballast, and automatic fault current limiting functions in a single device.

      Saturable reactors are not well-suited for use with mechanical recti-
fiers  because phase shift effects seriously affect the rectifier phasing.
They  are  also not well-suited for use in conjunction with monocyclic net-
works. High powered systems, 700 mA and larger, with saturable reactor
controls are sometimes adversely affected by H-V  sparking under light
load.   Basically, the spark transient unbalances core fluxes causing unsym-
metrical H-V waveforms, which induce additional sparks.   In bad situations,
many cycles may be required to return to normal symmetrical operating
conditions.

    Thyristor

      Phase control with back-to-back thyristors (silicon controlled  recti-
fiers) is an excellent means to  control precipitator energization levels.

-------
                                -264-
Fast, full-range control is easily accomplished with negligible control
power and the system is easily adapted to automatic control.   Control is
achieved by synchronous switching techniques and the switching devices
(SCR's) have low losses in the "on" and "off" states.  Successful appli-
cation of thryristor phase  control was realized in 1967.  It is highly
contingent upon selection of reliable, adequate devices,  proper firing
circuitry, and  due consideration of electrical conditions in precipitator
energization.   Use of thyristors in conjunction with silicon rectifiers

now permits electrical set conversion efficiencies (KWa   x 100) of
76% at 1500 mA, 50 kV power levels.   The theoretical maximum conver-
sion efficiency for a full-wave, single-phase rectifier is 81%,  assuming
lossless components.

     Ballast elements

      The circuit ballast function is simply satisfied by the fixed resistors
of suitable rating.  Resistors  with ribbon or  expanded metal grids prove
reliable and operate at reasonably low temperatures without hot spots.

      The monocyclic network originally proposed by Steinmetz is an
excellent  ballast element because it is  an energy storage device.  It is
simply a resonant bridge circuit which draws power from  the  source only
when load impedance is high.  As such, it inherently limits power under
short circuit precipitator  conditions.  Unfortunately, monocyclic  networks
are expensive to construct and they have the  ability to severely overload
components in  the event of an open-circuit condition.

      The ac reactor is another good ballast  element which will limit
fault currents quite efficiently.  This is an inductive element,  and some
care is  needed in its  application to make certain it does not introduce
high voltage transients into the system.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -265-
                              CHAPTER 11
                             BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.  Lemp,  H.,  U.S. Patent 774, 090 (1904).

2.  Lodge,  Sir  Oliver, U.S.  Patent 803, 180.

3.  Stevens, S. A.,  etal.,  "High Voltage Supplies for Electrostatic
   Precipitators, 1I Institute of Electrical Engineers,  Colloquium on
   Electrostatic Precipitators, London (1965).

4.  Van Hoesen, H.  E.,  "Automatic Control of Electrical Precipitators, "
   Paper 58-229, AIEE Winter General Meeting (Feb. 2-7, 1958).

5.  Ramsdell,  Roger,  'iDesign Criteria for  Precipitators, " American
   Power Conference (April 23-25, 1968).

6.  White,  H.  J.,  Industrial Electrostatic Precipitation,  Addison-Wesley,
   Reading,  Mass.  (1963).

-------
                                   -266-
                               CHAPTER 12
                             MEASUREMENTS
12. 1  MEASUREMENT OF GAS FLOW AND EFFICIENCY

      Standardized procedures have been established by various organi-
zations for the determination of the dust content of gases and the effi-
ciency of dust collection equipment.  Many of the  standards are either
based upon, or are similar to the ASME Performance Test Code PTC-
27, 1957.  Table 12. 1 compares some specifications of six different
measurement standards.

      The usual procedure in dust sampling is to determine the gas velocity
at a number of points in a cross  section of the ductwork as in a standard
pitot tube traverse.  The individual readings are used to determine the
required velocity for isokinetic sampling of the dust laden air.   Alterna-
tively, a null type pitot tube may be used to obtain isokinetic sampling.
The mean velocity is used  to calculate the total volume of the air per unit
time.  
-------
                                                     Table  12.1

                                 Comparison  of Six Measurement  Standards
Specification
Number of test
points
Location of test
points
Array of test points
(rectangular)
Array of test points
(circular)
Velocity measurement
Oust sampling
nozzle
Tubing
Filters
Sampling pump
Dust calculation
Other
Organization and Publication
A. S. M. E. »
PTC-27
12-20 if velocity
range less than 2: 1
and area more than
25ft1.
Double or treble if
In a straight run with
uniform velocity
Centroids of equal
areas
Centroids of quad-
rants of equal
area anuli
Average of pilot
tube traverse
Thin-edged isokinetic.
1/4-in. diameter
minimum
Smooth, cleanable,
short, airtight.
above dew point
99% collection
efficiency, tare
less than 20% of
dust weight
Adequate capacity
Sum over all
traverse points
Preliminary runs to
check instruments
and personnel
I. O. C. I. *
Pub No 1
V sq it area
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Isokinetic if particles
larger than 5 microns.
Taper less than 15*
Same as A. S. M. E.
99% collection
efficiency
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
V. D. I. *
2086
Not specified
In a straight run at
least ±3 hydraulic
diameters long
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Thin-walled isokinetic.
aim within ±5" of flow
Short, airtight,
corrosion resistant,
and no electric
charge
"complete capture"
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Include estimate of
error
National Council for
Paper Industries
Same as A. S. M. E.
In a stable flow
pattern 8 to 10
diameters upstream
'and 3 to 5 diameters
downstream to
nearest disturbance
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Isokinetic if particles
larger than S microns.
Aim within ±5° of
How.
Not specified
Paper, alundum,
membrane, glass
wool, wet scrubber,
or electrof liter
Not specified
Same as A. S. M. E.
5-10 mini ft
50-60 min total
time
Manufacturer No 1
Same as A. S. M. E.
la a straight run
with 10 times largest
dimension upstream
to nearest distur-
bance and with
s. p. il-in. w. e.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A.S.M.E.
Isokinetic
Not specified
Paper, alundum.
asbestos, or tar
camera
Aspirator or numo
Same as A. S. M. E.
Sample at least one-
hour
Manufacturer No. 2
4 if less than 2 ft*.
12 if between 2 and
25 If.
20 if more than 25 ft .
In a straight run
with uniform velocity
and 8 diameters
upstream to the
nearest disturbance
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Same as A. S. M. E.
Isokinetic
1/4-in. diameter
minimum
Smooth, corrosion
resistant
Paper, alundum,
glass cloth, membrane.
Impinger, or tar
camera

Same as A. S. M. E.
Maximum velocity
less than 1. 5 times
	 minimum 	
                                                                                                                                           to
* A. S. M. E.:  American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  I. O. C. I.:   Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute.
  V. D. I.     Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (German Engineer Association).

-------
                                   208
quadrants as shown in Figure 12. 1.  For a rectangular cross section,  the
sampling points are taken at the centroids of equaJ area rectangular sub-
divisions of the duct.  The velocity measurements are made by measuring
the velocity pressure with a standard pitot tube.  Special pitot tubes for
extreme dust conditions may be used provided proper calibration factors
are available.

      It is  important to select the location of the traverse carefully.
Locations which have a high degree of turbulence or nonuniformity are
undesirable, as are locations with very low velocities which would be
difficult to measure accurately.  Two location are required, one before
the inlet to the dust collector and one after the  outlet. The second
location is often chosen at the inlet to the  induced  draft fan where the
turbulence and nonuniformity are low and the velocity is high enough to
be measured with a reasonable  degree of accuracy.   The selection of a
point before the inlet to the dust collector is usually difficult, because  the
gas velocity  right at the inlet is rather low for  accurate  measurement,
and there is  often a diffuser plate in the way.  Any other spot upstream
from the dust collector inlet is  often either turbulent, nonuniform,  inaccess-
ible,  or hot.

      If it is necessary to run a pitot traverse close to the precipitator inlet,
the traverse location should be  downstream  from a diffuser plate  at least
5-10 hole diameters or mesh lengths, and far enough upstream from the
electrostatic precipitator to prevent sparkover to  the sampling probe.
                      (
12. 3  DETERMINATION  OF DUST CONCENTRATION

      Samples  of dust laden air are taken isokinetically at measured time
intervals at the traverse  points in the duct.  The sample probe should be
inserted to the location of the first traverse point  with the velocity pre-
adjusted to approximately the isokinetic rate.   The probe should be pointed
downstream, and the flow cut off until ready to sample.  At the start of
sampling,  the probe is rotated  into the flow and the sample flow started.
The sampling rate  is then checked for isokinetic flow and adjusted if neces-
sary.  Gas temperatures and pressures are recorded during the sampling
at each point.  The probe is held  at the sampling point for a predetermined
period of time,  calculated to give a total dust collection  sufficient for accu-
rate weighing,  but  not less than 10 minutes at each traverse point.  A mini-
mum  of about 100 milligrams of dust should be collected for accurate
weighing.  At the proper  time,  the probe is  moved quickly to the next
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                      -269-
•/
       2R2
.316R
r, « . 548R
          N
r  a radius to point p
N * no.  points (20 in example)
p = index (1 to 5 in example)

R = radius of duct
                     Figure 12.1.  Sampling Points in a Round Duct.

-------
                                 -270-
traverse point and the process is repeated.   The total run should cover the
circuit of all traverse points twice.  The weight of dust collected on the
filter medium divided by the total sampling volume is then the mean weight
per unit volume, or the mean concentration of dust in the gas stream.  This
mean concentration times  the mean gas volume per unit  time gives  the total
weight per unit time in the gas stream. Test runs made  in the dust collector
inlet and in the outlet give the required data to calculate the collection ef-
ficiency:
              W, -  W,
      T,  =  - i - ?_
where

      Wj  = weight per unit time- dust collected at inlet, and
      W2  = weight per unit time- dust collected at outlet.

      The sampling line includes the sampling probe, the filter holder,
possibly a condenser if the gas is humid or a cooler if the gas is hot,  a
gas meter,  a pump, and the necessary instrumentation to measure
temperature,  humidity,  and pressure for the calculation of gas density.
An Orsat apparatus or other gas analysis instrumentation may be used if
information about the  constituents of the gas is required, such as CO and
CO2 for carbon balance calculations or SO2 and SO3 for  information on the
effect of sulfur on resistivity.

      The sample probe may be of a null pressure type so that isokinetic
sampling can be achieved without reference to a previous velocity traverse.

      The filter medium may be one of several types, according to the
requirements of the particular situation:

      1.  Paper filter for dry gas at temperatures below 300°F.
      2.  Glass cloth filter for coarse dusts and temperatures to 750°F.
      3.  Alundum thimble  for high temperature and chemical resistance.
      4.   Membrane filter for fine dusts to sizes below 1 micron.
      5.  Impinger trains for particle size distribution  of insoluble dusts.
      6.  Electrostatic electrofilter for high efficiency  at low sampling rates.
      7.  Tar camera (colorimetric filter for nonaqueous mists).

The filter selected should  resist the conditions of temperature, pressure,
and chemical attack to which it will be exposed, and should have a collec-
tion efficiency of greater than 99%.  The filter must be protected against
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -271-
condensation during the test run.  If the filter assembly is part of the
sample probe,  it should be held inactive in the gas stream long enough for
it to warm up to the gas temperature so that condensation will not occur.

      The following items are usually measured or calculated  in testing
dust collection equipment:

      1.  Gas volume

         a.  Main stream - pitot traverse or stoichiometric calculation.
         b.  Sample stream - gas meter, flowmeter or calibrated orifice.
         c.  Corrections calculated for density.

      2.  Humidity - psychrometric dry bulb and wet bulb temperatures or
cooled condensate.

      3.  Gas composition - Orsat or other gas analysis instrumentation.

      4.  Gas density - calculated from composition, temperature, humidity,
and pressure.

      5.  Gas pressure - manometer and barometer.

      6.  Dust  concentration - weight of sample collected by isokinetically
sampled traverse.

      7.  Collection efficiency - calculated from concentrations at inlet and
outlet of collector.

      8.  Dust  properties - determined by analysis of dust sample (see ASME
PTC-28, 1965).

         a.  Size distribution -  calculate from Stokes' law and terminal
                   velocity distribution (ASME PTC-28, 1965).
         b.  Specific gravity - ASTM C188-44:  change in volume of kero-
                   sene or naptha with addition of dry sample.
         c.  Moisture content - weight loss in drying oven.
         d.  Water soluble content - weight loss  after dissolving in water.
         e.  Water soluble sulfate content -  chemical analysis of solute.
         f.  Resistivity - resistance of 5-mm layer of dust in a 3-in.
                   diameter cup through a 1-in. electrode weighted to
                   10 gm/cm .

-------
         g-
                                 -272-
  Specific surface - ASTM C204-55:  calculate from air per-
        meability.
      Figure 12. 2 shows one schematic arrangement of dust sampling
apparatus for testing dust collectors.  Other arrangements are possible,
depending on the  instrumentation available.  Two setups are required,
one upstream from the dust collector and one downstream.  It would be  ,.
desirable to run both upstream and downstream traverses simultaneously
to insure exactly the same operating conditions for both runs.   However,
standards usually require only that the operating conditions be maintained
constant.

12.4  COMPUTATION

      The computation of results of dust collector tests requires careful
attention to all corrections for temperature, humidity, density, and  instru-
ment calibration.
      The gas velocity may be calculated from the pitot tube readings with
necessary corrections.  A standard pitot tube reads the impact,  or velocity,
pressure directly with no correction for calibration.  All other types of
velocity pressure tubes must be calibrated and the data corrected.  The pitot
tube velocity at each traverse point is calculated by the formula:
      V  =  1096.5
where
      P
      d
Density =
               ft/min
the velocity pressure in inches water gage, and
the density of the gas calculated from the composition,
  temperature, and humidity of the gas.
                 144p.
           R (T, + 460) 2. 036
                    pounds per cubic foot,
where
     PS =
     T, =
static pressure, inches of mercury,
dry bulb temperature °F, and
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -273-
                 Wall of Flue
                                                                        -+. To
                                                                         Exhaust
                                                                         or Or sat
                                                                        Apparatus
 (1)  Sample probe and pitot tube
 (2)  Thermocouple
 (3)  Filter holder
 (4)  Temperature readout
 (5)  Inclined manometer
 (6)  Flow meter
 (7)  Humidity measurement
 (8)  Pump or blower
 (9)  Flow control valve
(10)  Cooler or condensate trap if required
  Figure 12. 2.  Schematic Arrangement of Dust Sampling Apparatus.

-------
                                  -274-
      R = gas constant calculated for composition of gas:
              R = 53. 3 for standard air, and
              R = 52.4 for 12% CO2 flue gas.

      Note that turbulent fluctuations in the gas flow show  up as variations
in the velocity pressure and that the velocity varies as the square root of
the pressure.  If there are wide variations in velocity pressure readings,
averaging the velocity pressures will not represent the average velocity.
Therefore,  pitot traverses should be made at locations where the turbu-
lence is relatively small. The pitot tube manometer becomes unreliable
when the velocity is below about 10  ft/sec (600 ft/min).  Therefore, pitot
traverses should be made at locations where the velocity is around 30-50
ft/sec (1800-3000 ft/min).

      The total gas flow may be calculated either from the integration of
the pitot tube traverse or from the stoichiometric relationships of com-
bustion.  The standard calculation for the mean velocity from a pitot tube
traverse is simply the arithmetic mean of all the traverse points:
and the total gas flow is determined from  the continuity equation:

      Q = Avm

where A is the actual measured cross-section area at the test section
including the effect of errors in construction,  warping of plates, and dust
deposits. (Refer to the section on sources of error for comments on the
use of the arithmetic mean velocity).

      To determine the total gas flow from stoichiometric  considerations,
it is desirable to have the ultimate analysis of the fuel being burned, the
operating conditions of the furnace, and an analysis of the  flue gas com-
position.  The total gas flow in cfm is given by


           WCT
      Q = __ Cfm
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -275-
where
      Wc = the weight of fuel burned per hour, and
        T = the volume of gas produced per pound of fuel.

      The weight of fuel per hour may be obtained by weighing or cal-
culating from

              Q ^T7l  _  IT*  \
              o \&  -  n,  )
      W  = 	—	V—
where

        S = the rate of steam generation,
      E  = the enthalpy of steam,
        S
      EW = the enthalpy of feed water,
        n = the boiler efficiency, and
        H = the heating value of fuel.

      To determine T, the volume of gas produced per pound of fuel, a
material balance may be made by following a known and detectable chemi-
cal element throughout the system.  Common examples of such elements
are carbon and sulfur.  The amounts of carbon and sulfur in the fuel are
known from the chemical analysis of the fuel and the amounts of CO2 and
SO2 in the exhaust gases are known from the tests on the gas with the Orsat
apparatus or other analytical procedures.   Trace elements can also be
used.

      The sample gas flow rate may be calculated from standard orifice
meter formulae if orifices are used to meter the sample flow, or may be
calculated  from the calibration  curves of whatever flow meter is used.
Because immediate adjustment  of sample flow to isokinetic sampling is
required, curves or tables are  required in the field for making these cal-
culations rapidly.
                           i
      The dust concentration by weight is determined as the ratio of the
weight of dust to the weight of gas:

             wr
      m =  	
             Wg

-------
                                -276-
where
                             n
      wr  = weight of dust =  S w^ = sum of traverse dust samples, and
                             i
               ...  -         ,  ,    total volume of gas sampled  .
      w   = weight of gas sampled = 	-	—	 	
       g                                      density

      The collection efficiency can be calculated from the dust concen-
tration in the  inlet and outlet to the collector:
       n  -
where

      m  = mass concentration,  outlet,  and
      m^  = mass concentration,  inlet.

      A similar calculation using dust concentration by volume may be made,
provided that the volumes are corrected  to the same basis,  that is,  at the
same temperature and pressure.  Because this would represent equivalent
densities,  the calculation would be identical.  Also,  a similar calculation
may be made using dust collected per unit time, provided the installation
is operating under steady-state conditions.  Because steady-state conditions
imply the same weight and volume of gas per unit time, the calculation
would again give an identical result.

12. 5  SOURCES OF ERROR

      Errors may occur  in measurement, or in calculation,  and also may be
intrinsic due to random variations.   Table 12.2 lists the sources of measure-
ment errors.   Some are  unavoidable and irreducible, but some can be
avoided or reduced to a small value.

      Isokinetic sampling is essential to  accurate sampling  in order to
obtain representative  samples of all particle sizes.  If the velocity into the
sampling nozzle is greater than the velocity of the gas stream, the larger
particles will be under-represented because they do not accelerate with the
gas.  If the velocity into  the sampling nozzle is lower than the velocity of the
gas stream, the larger particles will be  over-represented because they ram
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                        -277-
                      Table 12.2

            Sources of Measurement Errors
1.  Errors due to probe

      a.  Anisokinetic sampling velocity
      b.  Probe not parallel to gas flow
      c.  Dust collected on walls  or probe and sample line
      d.  Condensation in probe or sample line

2.  Errors due to sample collector

      a.  Efficiency less than 100%
      b.  Condensation in collector

3.  Errors in sample flow

      a.  Meter inaccuracy
      b.  Leaks

4.  Errors in weighing

      a.  Hygroscopic loss or regain of sample or filter media
      b.  Loss of sample in handling
      c.  Scale accuracy

5.  Errors in integrating

      a.  Variations over time or space of dust load or velocity
      b.  Integration error
      c.  Too few traverse points

6.  Errors due to personnel

      a.  Reading and recording errors
      b.  Failure to comply with requirements
      c.  Calculation errors

-------
                                   -278-
into the nozzles where smaller particles detour around the streamlines.
Figure 12.3 shows the flow lines  in the vicinity of a sampling probe.   It can
be seen that a representative sample will be taken only when the sample flow
is parallel to and equal in magnitude to the main gas flow—that is, isokinetic.
It is difficult to obtain precise isokinetic sampling in the case of velocity
variations, so  some unavoidable error may occur.

      A relationship between the accuracy of anisokinetic sampling and the
ratio of sampling velocity to approach velocity has been developed by Ruping.*
Figure 12.4 shows his curves of 1% and 5%  error plotted on a semilog grid
of sampling velocity ratio versus the dimensionless  parameter:
      k  =
            ws  wo
where

      R  -  the radius of sampling probe,
    wg  =  the settling velocity,
    w   =  the approach velocity, and
      g  =  the acceleration of gravity.

      For all possible values of the dimensionless parameter, it is necessary
to hold the sampling velocity within about ±2% of the isokinetic velocity for a
1% error,  or within about ±6% of isokinetic velocity for a 5% error.

      For a particular situation, the required range need not be quite as
restricted.   For example, for a 1/4-in.  I. D. probe, an approach velocity of
8 ft/sec, and a 10-micron particulate matter of unit specific gravity,
k  = 0. 13; and the allowable  range of sampling velocity would be about +25%
to -12% of isokinetic velocity for 5% accuracy.   However,  in a practical
situation, a wide range of particle sizes  will usually exist,  hence a wide
range of values of the parameter will result, and a narrow  range of sampling
velocities about isokinetic velocity will be required.

      Isokinetic sampling also requires that the probe  be parallel to the gas
flow at all times.  In a turbulent flow,  this may not be possible.  Standard
methods usually call for aiming to within ±5° of parallel to  the main gas
flow.   Note that the cosine of 5° is 0.996, so that the reduction in cross-
section of the nozzle facing the gas  stream will be only 0. 4% at that aiming
angle.
1Refer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                                                                                         I
                                                                                                         to
                                                                                                         -3
                                                                                                         (£>
                                                                                                         i
Local velocity greater

than sampling velocity
Sampling velocity' greater

than local velocity
Isokinetic
sampling
                          Figure 12. 3.  Flow Lines in the Vicinity of a Sampling Probe.

-------
         1.4
01
o
c

z
m
71
n
x

z

3
H


n
                                                                                                               i
                                                                                                              to
                                                                                                              oo
                                                                                                              o
                         0.2
            0.5
10
                                              Dimensionless Parameter   8&
                                     wswo
Figure 12. 4.  Accuracy of Anisokinetic Sampling.

-------
                                 -281-
      Although the pitot tube itself is  usually considered to be error free and
to have a calibration factor of unity, the manometer used to read the velocity
pressure is not free of error, especially if the gas flow is turbulent so that
the  manometer reading fluctuates.  A slant tube manometer with draft gage
oil of specific gravity 0. 826 may have divisions down to 0. 01 or 0. 02 inch
of water.   Thus,  the accuracy of reading the manometer will be about +0.01
inch water gage with constant gas velocity.  Figure 12. 5 shows the range
of apparent velocities for manometer accuracies of 0.01-in.  w. g. and
0. 1-in. w. g.  Note that the limits diverge rapidly at low velocities.  At
densities different from that for standard air, the curves shown will shift
slightly,  but the shape will be similar.  Also note that turbulent variations
in velocity pressures on the order of +0. 1 in. w. g. can introduce appreci-
able error.

      Errors due  to the sample collector depend on the efficiency of col-
lection for the  size particles in the gas  stream.  Because most of the mass
occurs in the larger particles,  a small  loss of mass in the smaller particles
will not necessarily be important.   Standards  call for 99% efficiency of the
sample collector.

      Errors in measurement of the gas volume sampled depend upon the
accuracy of the meter and its calibration.

      Errors in temperature readings depend  upon the calibration of the
thermocouples, resistance thermometers or glass thermometers  used,
random errors due to temperature  variations,  and heat losses due to heat
conduction through the thermometer stem or lead-in wires.  In thermo-
couples,  there is  the added possibility of a deviation in the temperature of
the cold junction.  Table 12. 3 shows the error limits for mercury thermom-
eters for various  scale divisions and temperature ranges.2

      Errors in weighing depend upon the scale accuracy and the size of
dust sample  collected with respect  to the tare weight of  the filter.  Care
must be taken to  avoid or compensate for hygroscopic loss or gain.  Care
must also be taken to include with the dust sample any dust deposited in
the  sampling nozzle and sampling tube.   A weight and collection efficiency
change can result from the paper thimble becoming charred if the gas
temperature exceeds 300°F.

      The existence of an error in the calculation of the mean value of
either velocity or dust concentration is  attributed in the literature to the

-------
                                      -282-
  3000
  1000

•S  800
B
£  500
o
£  400


   300




   200
   100
       —a = 0,01 in.
                        X
                /
                            a=0.

                  a = -0. 01 in. —
                                 1 in
                                                        /
z
                                                  JL
                                                  a= -0. 1 in.
                                                                       •y-
      0 .01
                  0. 02    0. 03  0. 04 0. 05 0. 06  0. 08  0.10           0. 2    0. 3  O. 4   0. 5 0. 6

                               Manometer Reading, inches water gage
      Figure 12. 5.  Accuracy of Velocity Readings for Manometer Accuracy of
                   + a Inches Water Gage and Standard Air Density.
                                                         SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                          -283-
                       Table 12.3




Permissible Error Limits for Glass/Mercury Thermometers
Range. *C
From
-58
0
50
100
200
300
400
515
To
0
50
100
200
300
400
515
700
More than 700
Error Limit ± "C for Scale Divisions of:
.01
-
.02
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
.02
-
.04
.04
-
-
-
-
-
-
.05
-
Oil
0.15
-
-
-
_
-
-
0.1
0.3
0.15
0.25
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
1
1.5
-
-
-
-
1
1
0.7
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
-
-
2
2
1
1.5
2
3
4
5
6
-
5 or 10
3
2.5
3
4
5
7
10
10
10

-------
                                   -284-
ranclom variations in time and space of the variable being measured.
However, there is an additional systematic error due to the fact that the
value of the velocity is zero at the wall and the present calculation tech-
niques do not take this into account.

      If the variable to be measured were perfectly random, a simple
average of all the points would be a satisfactory estimate of the mean
value. However, dust concentration and velocity are not perfectly random.
The velocity in the  core of the gas flow will be some average gas flow plus
and minus turbulence, but near the walls, the turbulence will be damped out
and viscous friction will diminish the flow velocity all the way to zero at
the walls .   The dust concentration in the core of the flow will be rapidly
mixed by turbulence to some mean concentration plus and minus both time
and space variation, but near the walls, the mixing effect will diminish
with decreasing turbulence so that dust concentration can be expected to be
lower near the walls,  possibly close to zero.  With large dust particles  in
the gas stream, the settling velocities  may overcome the mixing effect of
turbulence and a concentration stratification may occur with a heavy load
of larger  particles  near the  bottom of the duct.

      The mathematical definition of a  mean value of a variable over an
area is as follows:
where
      y  = variable,
      A  = area,  and
    b, a  = limits of A.

      The problem of determining the mean velocity or the mean dust con-
centration is, therefore,  a problem in numerical integration from a limited
number of traverse points.  If the function "y" were a simple linear function,
the mean would be  an arithmetic mean, or a simple average:

               n
  A.M.  = JL S  yi
           ni = 1
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                -285-
      If the variable were completely random, the arithmetic mean would
be satisfactory.  Because the gas flow is zero at the walls, the velocity
readings at all traverse points located adjacent to a wall will be higher than
the local mean and an average velocity calculated from the arithmetic mean
will be 5% to 15% high.  For example,  suppose a traverse were made in a
square duct with 25 traverse points and every point had a velocity of 100.
Also suppose,  for simplicity of calculation,  that the boundary layer is para-
bolic and  has a thickness equal to half the traverse spacing.  An average
velocity using the arithmetic mean would obviously be simply 100.   However,
by integration, a true mean velocity can be calculated.
/•
/



i t
100 1
1
1
1
1
100 1
r
i
i
i
100 '
1
1

1
100 1
1


1
k\




                             Velocity Profile
      By elementary calculus, the mean ordinate of a parabola is 2/3 of the
maximum.  Therefore, the edge points of the traverse would have a true
value as follows:
             66.6
                    I
                    o
100
                                     100 +  66.66
= 83.33
      Also by elementary calculus, it can be shown that the intersecting
parabolas at the corners have a mean of 1/2 the maximum.  Then the
corner points would have a true value as follows:
         50     I   66.6
                I

         66.6   |  100
                I	
     50 + 66.66 + 66.66 + 100 =  1?  x i00 = 70. 83
                4               24

-------
                                -286-
Then the corrected traverse would be as follows:
70.83
83.3
83.3
83.3
70.83
83.3
100
100
100
83.3
83.3
100
100
100
83.3
83.3
100
100
100
83.3
70.83
83.3
83.3
83.3
70.83
                     Calculated Mean Values
Then the overall average would equal

         4 x 70. 83 + 12 x 83.33 + 9 x 100
                        25
2183.28
  25
= 87.33
or 12. 66% less than the arithmetic mean.  Also, duct, dimensions may not
be known with required accuracy because of construction errors and dis-
tortions of flues due to warping,  temperature effects, dust buildup,  etc.
These may be common sources of error.

      Obviously,  the result would be different if the boundary layer thickness
were different, but it is apparent that the cook-book use of the arithmetic
mean in calculating an average value can lead to a large systematic error in
the calculation of the average velocity in a rectangular duct.  Research may
be required to determine  the relationship of a number of traverse points,
boundary layer thickness, and accuracy. Where a  high degree of accuracy
is required,  it is recommended that as many traverse points as is economi-
cally possible be used and that the boundary layer thickness  be measured
for calculation of the mean value as shown above.  The foregoing remarks
do not strictly apply to a pitot traverse in a round duct,  because only four
points will be in error in  a standard equal annular area traverse, instead
of the 16 erroneous points in the above  example.

      The distribution of dust in the duct work at the  measuring point may
be very nonuniform because the distribution can be distorted by transforms,
elbows, turning vanes,  and simple settling.  Therefore, the required num-
ber of traverse points will depend on the degree of uniformity.  However, a
relatively inaccurate measure of dust concentration at the inlet to the pre-
cipitator will not greatly decrease the accuracy of the efficiency calculation.
                                                SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -287-
Suppose the concentration at the inlet is about 100 times the concentration at
the outlet, both measured with ±10% accuracy.  Then the minimum and
maximum efficiency calculations would be as follows:
                    loo-  10
                                                       =  0-989
      ^  =   1  -   100 + 10   =  * " TTO" =  l ~°-009  =  °'991


Thus r? = 0. 99 ±  0.001.

      Therefore,  in efficiency calculations, the greatest accuracy is  '
required in the determination of the outlet dust loading.  Fortunately, the
outlet can usually be measured at a point with fairly uniform air flow,
fairly uniform dust distribution, and with velocities  high enough for
accurate readings of isokinetic sampling velocities.

      It is theoretically impossible to obtain a truly  representative sample
of any aerosol with a wide range of particle sizes because of the differences
in the trajectories of the different sizes.  Large particles tend to settle
out,  but  small particles tend to follow the  gas flow.  For example,  the
terminal velocities of spherical particles with unit specific gravity are
approximately as  follows:

      Size,  microns         _ Terminal Velocity _

           0. 1              8 x 10" cm /sec or 2-1/2 inches /day
           1                3 x 10~3cm/sec or 4-1/2 inches/hour
          10                0.3 cm /sec or 6-1/2 inches /min
         100                25 cm /sec  or 10 inches /sec
        1000                400 cm /sec or 150 inches /sec

      Thus, a 1- micron particle in a 250 cm /sec wind (8. 2 ft/sec  or 5. 6
mph) is moving almost horizontally:  arc tan 3 x 10"3 cm/sec  = 0° 0' 2. 5 in.
                                              250 cm/sec
arc tan 0. 000012, but a 100- micron particle in the same wind has  an appreci-
able trajectory angle with respect to horizontal: arc tan 25 cm/sec  _
                                                       250 cm /sec
5°40'.  Therefore, from a theoretical point of view,  it is not possible to

-------
                                -288-
aim a sampling probe at the correct angle for all particle sizes.  However,
from a practical point of view, an aiming error of only 5° is inconsequential.
At extremely low gas velocities, however,  the trajectory angle for large
particles gets disastrously large.

      No comment on errors due to personnel needs to be made other than
to recommend  the use of trained,  experienced,  reliable personnel for
testing.

      The total effect of all errors combined  may be serious when the col-
lection efficiency is low.  Although there are many sources of error,  and
care must be taken to minimize their effect,  the efficiency calculation is
not very sensitive to these errors when the efficiency is high.  If we assume
the error in measurement is ±a for both inlet and  outlet, we can derive the
following relationship between true efficiency versus calculated efficiency.
      "calc =  1 +         l   (H - 1)

      Figure 12. 6 shows this relation plotted on an inverted log (1 - x) by
log (1 - y) scale for measurement errors of ±10%, ±20%,  and ±50%.  Note
that even a 20% measurement error at a calculated efficiency of 99. 5%
only represents a range of true efficiencies from 99. 25 to 99. 67%.

      However, if the emission from a stack is specified,  then the impor-
tant factor is the accuracy with which one can measure the dust concentration
at the outlet and the measurement errors apply directly.

12. 6  MEASUREMENT  OF RESISTIVITY

      Since resistivity plays such an important  role in governing precipitator
performance,  it is important that it be measured with sufficient accuracy so
that its influence on precipitator performance can be determined.

      There are a variety of methods utilized for determining  resistivity.
They are classified as laboratory measurements if the dust is extracted from
the duct and measurement  subsequently made in the laboratory, and in- situ
if the resistivity measurement is made in the duct or in the presence of the
gaseous atmosphere of  the duct.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -289
   99.9
   99.8
U

S
w
s-,
H
                                   Calculated Efficiency
 Figure 12.6.  Relationship between True Efficiency Vs. Calculated Efficiency.

-------
                                -290-
      Laboratory techniques vary in the manner in which the resistivity is
determined and in which the dust layer is deposited.  The simplest method
of resistivity measurement is to utilize a pair of plates which serve as the
electrodes and measure the current and voltage while maintaining the cell at
the temperature corresponding to that in the duct.

      Figure 12. 7 shows a high voltage conductivity cell that is used for
laboratory measurement.  The cell is normally mounted  in an oven and its
temperature controlled over the range  of interest.  Dust  can be placed on
the plate manually, or it can be electrostatically deposited by increasing the
voltage on the point electrode so that a corona is formed.  Once the deposit
is formed, a plate is lowered onto the dust surface and the resistivity
determined from the  current-voltage readings.

      Because of the  dependence of resistivity on humidity as well as temp-
erature, other types  of laboratory measurement equipment are arranged to
introduce moisture and perhaps other conditioning agents  in a recirculating
system.  Dust is introduced into the system and, after sufficient time for
equilibrium,  is precipitated onto the plate of a high voltage conductivity cell.
Resistivity is  then measured by lowering a disc onto  the dust surface, and
the voltage and current measured for resistivity calculations.

      Laboratory measurements have the inherent disadvantage that the
atmosphere to which  the dust is exposed during measurement is different
from that in operation;  also, the dust may have undergone chemical and
physical changes after removal from the original source.  Consequently, the
resistivities determined by laboratory techniques can be  in error by several
orders  of magnitude in  the temperature range where  surface conduction pre-
dominates. Figure 12.8 shows  resistivity data taken on the  same dust by
laboratory and in-situ techniques.  The values agree well in the temperature
range where volume conduction predominates,  but the laboratory data are
considerably higher in the low temperature region.  The  disagreement between
laboratory and in-situ data depends upon the nature of the dust and gas.
Agreement can be good under some conditions,  but very poor in others.

      In-situ resistivity measurements are made under conditions in which
the only atmosphere to  which the dust is exposed is that present in the pro-
cess.  This eliminates  uncertainties in attempting to duplicate the gaseous
conditions and generally gives more reliable and reproducible results than
those obtained by laboratory techniques.
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                      -291-
     Scale,  in.
          Li;	i^u^^jk^^yaczz
           > I!
11    ji
"'"•gEJf
   ^B

           1!
          liMl
          III)
Figure 12.7.  High Voltage Cell for Measurement of Dust
           Resistivity.

-------
                            -292-
                                                       In-situ Tests
                                                       Laboratory
                                                              Tests
                                                  F . 1667
J «1.56-10
                            	\
            Bayswater Specimens

 	 	     New Vale Specimens
                                 = 1667 -*- /   \
                                       cm
                       Temperature,  °C
                              150
        200       250        300       350
                       Temperature,  °F
400
450
500
     Figure  12.8.  Resistivity-Temperature Relations
                    (Reference 3).
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -293-
      Figure 12.9 is a schematic diagram of a typical in-situ resistivity probe.
The apparatus  consists of a point-plane cell at the end of the probe, which is
inserted into the duct through openings of from 2-1/2" to 4" diameter.   When
a voltage sufficient to generate a corona is applied to the cell,  dust is pre-
cipitated onto the plate.  After  sufficient time has elapsed to collect a dust
layer, the point-plane disc is lowered onto the dust layer and the current
and voltage are measured. The probe is  then removed and the dust thickness
measured.  Resistivity can then be calculated from the dimensions of the
probe, thickness of the dust layer,  and the electrical data.  Thermocouples
on the probe are used to  measure temperature.

      Figure 12. 10  is another type  of in-situ resistivity probe.  It  differs  from
the first type discussed in that  the dust and gas are drawn from the duct
into a small cyclone separator  where the  dust is separated and deposited
into a resistivity cell. The cell is  composed of a central electrode and an
outer cylindrical electrode on the inside of the cyclone dust hopper.  The
collected dust forms an annular layer between the two electrodes,  and the
resistivity is determined from  resistance measurements.

      The two types of resistivity measuring instruments differ in  the size
particle  collected,  and in the manner in which the deposit is formed.  No
data have been found which show comparative resistivity values measured by
the two methods.

      Cohen4 reports that for some types  of dust, the resistivity varies with
aging time after collection.  Figure 12.11 shows that for a particular dust the
resistivity measured  10   ohm-cm immediately on collection and rose to 10
after  20  minutes. Laboratory resistivity values are shown on the same  curve,
and the data indicate that the  in-situ resistivities approach the  laboratory
values after about 30 minutes.  It is postulated that the change of resistivity
with time is due to a change of  the conducting film by chemical and/or physical
interaction with the  bulk  of the  dust particles.  If so,  it is interesting to note
that the resistivity of the collected dust would also change with time, so that
resistivity would be a dynamic  rather than a static property.

      Since the techniques for resistivity  measurements are not standardized,
the data  should be interpreted cautiously,  and the method used  in the measure-
ments identified.  It should be especially  noted that critical resistivity values
in terms of precipitator operation should  be identified with the  method of mea-
surement, since the values can vary by as much as two orders of magnitude.

-------




Thermocouple Mater

High Voltage
Connection (




n ^
fTf\ (
"^ ^
•
	 Connection

I ^
V















Point

^
vn
Disc
ww\ ^n

-Tl
Plate
s


Hxxxxxx>coooo^
Point- Plane Cell
Microammeter
Connection








Li
Wvv
O _ __» _, 1 C .,
t







k>3.n)piirig
Hole to
CD
1
F/v/w
1 '
Adapter
Flange
Fiberglas String


8
2
m
a
z
a
E
i
n
X
z
5
















































-



'^




'
Flue
Wall




Figure 12.9. Resistivity Probe.








































-t

-------
                               -295-
                               F: Exhaust from Cyclone
                                     V
              E: Thermometer
G: Inlet from
    Sampling^
    Probe
Hr^Connection to
     Megohmeter
A: Cyclone
B: Resistivity Cell
C: Heater
D: Rapper
                  Figure 12.10.  Diagram of Apparatus.

-------
               -296-
       10'
          02    4    6    8   10  12
                   Time, min
Figure 12.11.  Resistivity Changes During Site
               Measurements on Four Different
               Power Stations.  (Reference 4)
                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                -297-


                            CHAPTER 12
                           BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.  Verein Deutscher Ingenieure,  VDI-2066 - Standards. "Performance and
    Measurements at Dust Collectors" (May 1966).

2.   Darby, K. H. and Heinrich, D. O., "Conditioning of Boiler Flue
    Gases for Improving Efficiency of Electrofilters," Staub 26, No.  11,
    pp 12-17  (1966).

3.   Tassicker,  O. J.,  Herceg, A. and McLean, K., "The Electrical
    Resistivity of Fly-Ash from Bayswater and Newvale," Bulletin No.  11,
    University of New South Wales (Dec. 1966).

4.   Cohen, L. and Dickinson,  R., "The Measurement of the Resistivity
    of Power Station Dust,"  J. Sci. Inst. 40, p 72 (1963).

-------
                                  -298-


                               CHAPTER 13
                 TROUBLESHOOTING AND MAINTENANCE
      When an electrostatic precipitator fails to achieve its design efficiency,
it is necessary to examine the causes for its poor performance and take cor-
rective action where possible.  The number of causes for poor precipitator
performance is  so large that  it is impractical to establish a rigid procedure
for determining the  exact problem.  Rather it is a task of reviewing all
aspects of the precipitator operation and arriving at possible trouble based
on operating data and physical examination. Diagnosis of the problems and
corrective action requires a good understanding of precipitation theory, as
well as practical experience in precipitator operation.

      Precipitator problems can arise either when the precipitator is brought
on line, or after an  extended period of operation.  In the latter case, the
difficulties may be associated with improper maintenance, changes in gas
flow due to dust accumulation, misalignment or warping of the  electrodes,  or
changes in the dust properties due to changes in the fuel or process param-
eters.  In the former case problems are more likely to result  from poor
gas distribution, inadequate area of collecting surface, or inadequate ener-
gization.

      Causes for precipitator problems can be classified generally as follows:

              1)  Electrical
              2)  Gas Flow
              3)  Rapping
              4)  Mechanical

      Since an electrostatic precipitator operates on the basis  of electric
field and electric charge, it follows that the electrical energization must be
adequate to provide  for particle charging, maintenance of the electric-field,
and for holding the collected dust to the collection plates.  Field tests show
a close correlation between efficiency and useful corona power.  Figure 13.1
is a plot of efficiency of  fly ash precipitators vs. corona power.  This
curve is useful as a guide to determining whether existing electrical
energization is sufficient to achieve the desired efficiency.
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                 -299-
    99
S
0)
W
o
o
o
U
    98
97

96
95
94
93
92
91
90
80
70

60
50
40
30
20 _
10 L
 0
       7
      0
             25         50         75        100
                   Corona Power,  watts/1000 cfm
125
150
   Figure 13.1  Relationship between Corona Power and Efficiency for
                Fly Ash Precipitators.

-------
                                   -300-


      There are several possible causes for inability to achieve the required
level of power input.   The most common ones  are

              1)  High dust resistivity
              2)  Excessive dust accumulations on the electrodes
              3)  Unusually fine particle size
              4)  Inadequate power supply range
              5)  Inadequate sectionalization
              6)  Improper rectifier and control operation
              7)  Misalignment of the electrodes

      Normal power supply operation is indicated by voltages in the proper
range as determined by the precipitator electrode spacing.  Typical values
for these currents range from 10 to 30 mA per 1000 sq ft of collecting
surface.  For most applications,  the power supply output is controlled  by
the spark rate and is adjusted to give around 10 to 100 sparks per min per
section.  The setting of the spark rate should be  such as to give maximum
average high tension voltage,  usually resulting in spark rates as shown
above.

      If a precipitator is operating in a spark rate limited condition but with
low current and voltage, the problem commonly can be traced to high resis-
tivity dust, electrode misalignment, or  uneven corona due to buildup on the
discharge electrode.

      Because of the importance of resistivity in the precipitation process,
in-situ resistivity measurements should be made as one of the first steps in
troubleshooting.   If the resistivity is found to be  high (in excess of 1010 ohm-
cm) most of the difficulty may be due to this cause.  If this is not the case,
other potential causes of abnormally low currents should  be investigated.

      High dust resistivity affects precipitator  efficiency principally by
limiting the voltage and current at which the precipitator  operates.  If the
precipitator electrodes are clean, the high tension voltage can be increased
until a sparking condition is reached.  The maximum voltage is  determined
principally by the gas composition and precipitator dimensions.

      If dust  is deposited on the collection electrode,  the  voltage at which
sparking occurs is decreased due to the increased electric field at the dust
surfade;  If the  resistivity of the dust layer is increased,  the voltage at
which sparking occurs will be further reduced.  Finally,  at very high
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -301-
values of dust resistivity, the voltage will be reduced sufficiently so that
sparks will not propagate across the interelectrode space.  Under these
conditions,  the gas in the interstitial regions of the dust layer will break
down,  resulting in a back corona.  The positive ions, resulting from this
corona,How toward the discharge electrode and neutralize the  negative
charge previously applied to the dust particles.

      Back corona results in an increase in current at low voltage and is
manifested visibly as  a diffuse glow at the surface  of the  dust layer.   Visual
verification of the presence of back corona is usually very difficult; how-
ever, it  can be observed under very dark conditions.

      Corrective  procedures for precipitators  that are limited by high
resistivity include gas conditioning or alterations in temperature to reduce
the resistivity of  the dust.  Some improvements can also be made by
increased sectionalization.

      If a precipitator is operating in a spark-limited mode with abnor-
mally low voltage on dust with resistivities less than 1010 ohm-cm, the
problems are likely to be associated with misalignment of the  electrodes,
uneven deposits on the discharge wire or broken corona wires.

      Occasionally,  precipitators are encountered  that operate at the maxi-
mum voltage or current settings on the power supply with no sparking. This
condition is likely to be associated with the collection of low resistivity dusts,
where the electric field in the deposit is insufficient to initiate sparking.
These installations are referred to as "power hogs. "  The fact that the
precipitator is not sparking does not necessarily mean that the unit is under-
powered.  These  installations may have sufficient power  to provide adequate
charging and collection electric fields without sparking.   If low efficiencies
are encountered and tests show that sufficient power  is provided, then other
disruptive conditions should be sought.

      Other electrical problems encountered with precipitators are shorting
of the high tension frame by dust accumulation in the hoppers,  broken wires,
insulator or "flower pot" bushing leakage, and broken down or leaky cables.


13.1  GAS FLOW

      Uneven  gas  velocity distribution in a precipitator can reduce the efficiency
several ways.  First,  because of the exponential relationship between gas

-------
                                   -302-
velocity and efficiency, an uneven gas distribution flow results in a lower
efficiency than would be predicted from the average.  Second, uneven gas
How can cause scouring or erosion of the dust from the collection plates,
thereby reducing efficiency.   Third, poor gas flow patterns can result in
dust fallout and accumulation on turning vanes and in the  duct work.   Such
accumulations  can further interfere with gas flow, and cause decreased per-
formance.  Plugging of distribution plates is also a commonly encountered
problem which disrupts gas flow.

      Evidence of poor gas flow quality (uniformity of flow) is obtained from
a gas velocity distribution profile at the precipitator inlet.   The IGCI recom-
mends a gas  quality such that 85% of the local velocities is within 25% of the
mean with  no single reading  more than±40% from the mean.  This is the
minimum requirement for good precipitation.

      Other types of gas flow problems commonly experienced are air
inleakage into hoppers from  the dust conveyor system  and "gas sneakage"
(see below) through the upper portion  of the precipitator around the high
tension frame.  Air inleakage through the conveyor system results in
reentrainment of collected dust which is carried back into the precipitator.
Air inleakage can also occur through the precipitator shell or inlet flanges,
if the precipitator operates at less than atmospheric pressure.  Often suf-
ficient air  is bled into the system to cause intense sparking.

      "Gas sneakage" is the  term used to describe gas flow that consti-
tutes a by-pass around the effective precipitator section.  It can occur
through dead passages of the precipitator above the collector plates, around
the high tension frame, or through the hoppers.  The gas sneakage problem
usually accounts  for only a few percent drop in efficiency unless it is
exceptionally severe.  The problem can be  identified by measurement of
gas flow in the suspected areas in a nonoperating or cold test.  Corrective
measures  usually involve baffling to direct the gas into the active precipi-
tator section.

      Problems of  reentrainment of dust  from the hoppers by virtue  of
air inleakage or gas sneakage can often be identified by an  increase in dust
concentration at the bottom of the exit to the precipitator.

13.2  RAPPING

      Rapping requirements  for various types of dusts are discussed in the
section on  rapping and reentrainment.  Unfortunately, there are inadequate
data from which to determine rapping  requirements based on variations in
                                                  SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -303-


dust resistivity,  current density and other dust conditions.

      Rapping is needed on both the discharge and collection electrodes.
The rapping forces, can be either too mild or too severe and result in poor
performance.  Removal of the collected dust is best achieved when the
intensity and frequency of rapping  is such that the dust falls from  the col-
lection plates in sheets;! hence too intense and frequent rapping can result
in a clean plate with the collected dust reentrained rather than falling  into
the hopper.  On the other hand, inadequate rapping can result in an exces-
sive thickness  of deposit on both collection and discharge electrodes,  which
can lead to other disruptive effects.

      Inadequate rapping of the discharge electrodes can result in heavy
dust build up with a localization of the corona, low corona current,and ex-
cessive sparking.

      The presence of a deposit on the discharge electrodes can be a result
of several factors, including poor gas flow and the conditions of the dust.
Often deposits  of up to two inches diameter can form.  These deposits or
donuts are generally composed of the finer dust particles and often cling
tenaciously to the discharge wire.  Deposits on the discharge wires do not
necessarily result in poor performance,  although depending on resistivity,
power supply range, and uniformity of the deposit, it can constitute a  source
of reduced efficiency.

      Rapping of both collection and discharge electrodes is only effective
if the force is transmitted to the respective electrodes.  Variations in the
design of the support structure and in the electrodes themselves can also
result in inadequate rapping.  Recent investigations of rapping acceleration
in fly ash precipitators have shown measured accelerations  of approxi-
mately 5g's on the plates when accelerations  of SOg's may be required.
If practical, measurement of the rapping acceleration with accelerometer
mounted on the plates can be used to check rapping adequacy. A common
method of adjusting rappers is with the use of an optical  dust measuring
instrument  in the precipitator exit  gas  stream.

      The discharge electrodes should be kept as clean as practical.   The
rapping intensity in this case  is limited only by mechanical damage to the
electrodes and support  structure.

-------
                                   -304-
13. 3  HOPPERS AND ASH REMOVAL

      Hoppers and ash removal systems often constitute problems in pre-
cipitator operation. If the hoppers become full, the precipitator may
become short circuited by the collected dust.  Often the power through
the dust is sufficient to fuse the dust, and a large clinker-type structure
called a "hornet's nest" is formed.   This further interferes with ash removal
and must be removed for proper operation.  Most problems associated
with the hoppers are in providing for proper flow of the dust.  Improper
adjustment of the hopper  vibrators or failure of the conveyor system are
the usual causes of the failure to  empty the hoppers.  In some instances it
may be necessary to provide heat and/or thermal insulation for the  hoppers
to avoid moisture condensation and a related cementing of the collected dust.

      Air leakage and gas sneakage as related to hoppers have been pre-
viously discussed.

13.4 TROUBLESHOOTING TECHNIQUES

      The  procedures used in locating precipitator troubles are principally
those of measurement of those quantities that can be readily determined
and a visual inspection and observation of the precipitator itself.  Depending
upon the severity of the problem,  the difficulty will be more or less obvious.
For example,  if a precipitator is designed for 90-95% efficiency and is
operating at 50-60%, the  difficulties  are gross  ones.  In contrast, the
problems  in increasing efficiency from 90-95% may involve subtle changes
or improvements.

      Gross difficulties with  precipitators are usually those associated
with inadequate electrical energization or excessive reentrainment.  The
following techniques are  generally useful in pinpointing the causes of
gross precipitator problems.

      1) Measurement of high tension voltage,  current,  and
         spark rate.

      2) Measurement of gas flow distribution.

      3) Observation of the collecting plates  for evidence  of back
         corona.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -305-
      4) Oscilloscope record of the high tension voltage to determine
         the duration of the corona current.

      5) Direct observation of the collection plate for evidence of
         scouring or excessive reentrainment.  (This requires
         construction of a glass plate and wiper for an access port
         and a  means for illumination of the interelectrode space.)

      6) Measurement of the  dust distribution at the precipitator
         exit.

      7) Careful  examination of the general alignment and the con-
         ditions of the hoppers, insulators,  and other components.

      8) Measurement of the  rapping accelerations.

      9) Observation of the corona wire and the uniformity of the
         corona tufts.

13.5 MAINTENANCE

      Maintenance of precipitators falls into the categories of preventive
maintenance and maintenance to correct failures of some part of the system.
Preventive maintenance schedules should be established to conform to the
requirements for  the particular installation.  A typical maintenance schedule
is given in Table  13.1 for a fly ash precipitator.  The items covered will give
an idea of  the types of maintenance that need to be performed on a weekly to
monthly basis.

      Problems with failure of precipitator components  are usually asso-
ciated with power supply, wire breakage, failure of structural parts due to
corrosion, fatigue, or rapper failure.

      Power supply failures should be handled by only those  personnel com-
petent to service high voltage equipment.  The types  of failure that may be
encountered are:  (1) malfunction of the control circuit,  (2) rectifier failure,
or (3) transformer failure.  Conventional high voltage servicing procedures
should be used to  identify the particular power supply problem.

      The  majority of the precipitators now in service utilize vacuum tube
or solid-state rectifiers.  Normal vacuum tube life ranges from 12, 000 to

-------
                                   -306-


                              Table 13. 1

                     Typical Maintenance Schedule
A.  Annual Inspection

    1.   Internal inspection

         a.   Observe dust deposits on collecting plates and wire before
             cleaning - a j" deposit is normal. If metal plates are clean,
             there is a possibility that a section is shorting out.  If more
             than ^-" of dust is on plates, rappers are not cleaning.

         b.   Observe dust buildup on  wires.

         c.   Interior corrosion - corrosion could indicate air leak through
             shell, or could indicate moisture carryover from air heater
             washer.

         d.   Plate corrosion  adjacent to door or near bottom of  plate could
             indicate inleakage  through  doors.

         e.   Check plates for alignment and equal  spacing between plates.

         f-   Measure to see that discharge wires hang midway between
             plates.

         g.   Check for  and replace broken wires.

    2.   Hopper inspection

         a.   Check for  dust buildup in upper corners of hoppers.

         b.   Check anti-sway insulators to  see that they are cleaned and
             not cracked.

         c.   Check high tension weights  - if one has dropped 3",  this
             indicates broken wire.

         d.   Check hopper bottom and valve for debris.
                                                    SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                   -307-
             Table 13.1 - Maintenance Schedule (Continued)

    3.   Penthouse inspection

         a.   Check for corrosion due to condensation and/or  leakage of
             flue gas into housing.

         b.   Excessive dust in penthouse indicates air sealing pressure too
             low.

         c.   Clean all high tension insulators.

         d.   Check that all high tension connections are secure.

         e.   Check that collars on high tension vibrator insulators are
             secure.

    4.   Transformer inspection

         a.   Check liquid level.

         b.   Clean high tension line, insulators, bushings, and terminals.

         c.   Check surge arresters, spark gap should be ^5".

    5.   Control cabinet inspection

         a.   Clean and dress relay contacts.


B.  Rappers and Vibrators Checked Quarterly

    1.   Rappers

         a.   Check distributor switch contacts for wear and lubricate.

         b.   Clean dust, dirt,  and moisture from cabinet.

         c.   Check rapper assembly for binding at plunger or misalignment.

-------
                                 -308-
             Table 13.1 - Maintenance Schedule (Continued)

    2.  Vibrators

        a.   Check contacts on load cams  to see that they are clean.

        b.   Clean dirt, dust, and moisture from cabinet.

        c.   Check vibrators to see that they operate at proper intervals.

C.  Checks to Be Made Each Shift

    1.  Electrical reading for each control unit should be recorded and
        checked for abnormal readings.

    2.  Rapper controls should be checked to see that they operate.

    3.  Vibrator controls should be checked.
                                                   SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    .309-


20, 000 hours,  and servicing usually involves only replacement  of defective
rectifier tubes.  Most solid state rectifiers are relatively trouble free and
maintenance is not normally required.  Transformer oil should be periodically
inspected to determine its condition,  however transformers generally last
the life of the precipitator.

      Insulators  and flower pot bushings which hold the high tension frame
must be kept clean and dry to prevent arcing.   This  is normally done by
providing a source of clean, dry gas to the insulator compartment.  Should
the dusty,  moist gas from the precipitator get into the insulator compartment,
arcing would occur and ultimately result in the failure of the insulator.

      One of the  most common difficulties with electrostatic precipitators
of the suspended wire electrode type  is wire failure.  Depending on the
location of the break, the wire can fall in such a way as to short circuit
an entire section and it must be removed before the  section can be  reenergized.

      Wire  failures can be caused by corrosion, excessive localized
sparking or mechanical fatigue.   It is often difficult  to determine the exact
cause of failure; the best procedure is to keep account of the location of
the failed wire in the precipitator and the position of the break along the
wire to determine if the failures are random or associated with a particular
location in the unit.  Corrosion failures generally occur around cooler
areas where condensation can take place.  Excessive air bled in around
insulators can cause condensation leading to failure  of the wires near
the insulators.  Electrical sparking in localized areas is also a common
cause of failure.  Normal sparking is a statistical phenomenon and the
location of the spark can be  at any position along the wire and in any wire.
However, localized areas of high field strength can confine sparking to a
particular area,  and this will ultimately lead to failure at that position.
Common faults leading to this type failure are misalignment of the  elec-
trodes or improper shielding around edges of collection plates.   These
conditions call for realignment of the plates, use of  shrouds to reduce the
field at critical locations, or removal of sources that might cause localized
high fields.

      Mechanical failure  can occur because of movement of the  wire under
the influence of aerodynamic and electrical forces.  If a wire  is moved
from the center of the field by an uneven gas flow, an electrical force
will  develop causing the wire to move further in the  same direction.  This
movement could  result in fatigue failure of the wires.

-------
                                  -310-
      When it is recognized that a typical precipitator contains approxi-
mately 10, 000-30, 000 feet of wire,  it is  reasonable to expect some wire
failure.

      There have been some attempts to  establish a normal failure rate
in terms of the number of wire failures per year per  1, 000 ft of wire;
however,  there is a wide variation in experience depending on application,
and no standard or normal failure rate has been established.

      Most industrial gases are corrosive under proper temperature
conditions, and corrosion must be considered as a problem in the design
and maintenance of electrostatic precipitators.  This  can be  handled by
the use of  corrosion-resistant materials  or by maintaining the tempera-
ture of the critical components above the dew point.   Use of corrosion-
resistant materials  is practiced for precipitators  used in the collection
of sulfuric acid fume,  in cement kiln precipitators operating at low tempera-
tures, in some precipitators  collecting dust from  black liquor recovery
boilers, and in some fly ash precipitators operating with  high sulfur coal
at low temperatures.

      Because of the trend to lower exit gas temperatures in electric power
generating stations, problems of corrosion have become more acute in
that application.  One of the major corrosion problems is that of the pre-
cipitator shell.  In order to reduce corrosion to a minimum, it is custom-
ary to provide good  insulation on the shell to keep its  temperature as high
as practical.  This technique has been adequate within the range of tempera-
tures and sulfur contents used.

      In addition to the shell, corrosion can also occur at other locations.
Air inleakage at joints can cause severe  localized corrosion.  The major
consideration as far as maintenance  is concerned  is to maintain all
corrosion-susceptible surfaces above the dew point and to prevent air
inleakage into vulnerable areas of the precipitator.
                                                 SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -311-
                               CHAPTEM 14
             ELECTROSTATIC AUGMENTATION AND UNUSUAL
            	PRECIPITATION DESIGNS	


      Augmentation of particulate control devices by superposition of an elec-
tric field or by charging of the dusts has been studied to varying degrees.
Also, the use of methods of establishing an electric field by space charge
and alternative methods  of particle charging have been subjects of continuing
interest.

      Electrostatic augmentation has been applied to fabric filters,  packed
bed filters, wet scrubbers,  and mechanical collectors, using both conventional
and alternative methods  of establishing an electric field and particle charging.

      The following discussion is limited to an examination of the concepts
involved in electrostatically augmented particulate control devices and in
unusual precipitator designs, as opposed to a critique of the implementation.
14.1  WET SCRUBBERS

      The  efficiency of wet particulate scrubbers is generally limited by the
ability to capture the dust particles by the water droplets.  Conventional high
efficiency  scrubbers are operated with relatively large pressure drops to
achieve a high relative velocity between the dust particle and the water drop-
let.  This  high velocity  is necessary to propel the dust particle across the
boundary layer and to overcome the surface tension of the water drop so that
the particle will  be captured..  Fine dusts require a very large pressure  drop,
and hence  high energy requirements,  because the mechanism that transports
the dust particle through the boundary layer is primarily inertial,

      One  concept of electrical augmentation of wet scrubbers is to charge
the water and dust with  an opposite polarity in an attempt to utilize  the
attractive  electrical forces to bring the dust and water droplets together.1

      An analysis of the attractive forces involved between a 0. 5ju diameter
dust particle and lOjj, water droplet exhibits a variation as shown in
iRefer to the bibliography for this chapter.
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     312
 Figure 14.1.   The particles and water droplets are considered to be oppo-
 sitely charged to saturation in a relatively high electric field of 6 kV/cm.
 The force equation from electrostatics is

                     F  =  q • q2/47re0r2 Newtons

 The saturation charge for the dust and water droplet is 78 and 31, 000 elec-
 tronic charges,  respectively.   The attractive force as a function of separa-
 tion distance is

                     F  =  5- 65 * I0""	  Newtons
                                 r2
 when the separation distance is measured in meters.  The graph shows the
 attractive force  for separation  distances from  10 to lOOju.  At lOjm, the
 dust particle will be  within the  boundary layer  of the air around the water
 droplet and they will contact.  At distances  greater than 100^,  the force
 becomes negligible.

      A  reference force for the gravitational attractive force acting on a
 50ju water droplet is included which causes  this water droplet to fall toward
 the earth with  a  settling velocity of about 10 cm/sec.  This suggests that
 the effect of the  electrostatic attractive force is rather small, except for
 very close approaches.

      The electrical force causes an increase in the relative velocity of
 the dust particle and the water  droplet of only about 3. 0 cm/sec for the
 example considered.  While this is a rather small  change in the relative
 velocity,  the fact that the attractive force always exists will tend to increase
 the collection efficiency of the very small particles somewhat.   Since this
 effect is rather small, it seems that it would be more desirable to install
 an electrostatic precipitator initially than to include both positive and nega-
tive charging fields in front of the high energy wet  scrubber.

      Another  technique for augmentation of wet scrubbers is through the
 use of an electrostatic precipitator as an agglomerator to modify the par-
 ticle size distribution of the dust to the scrubber.2 Since the collection
 efficiency for scrubbers is greater for large particles, the reentrained
 black liquor fume from a paper mill recovery system is more easily col-
lected after agglomeration.  The tests reported were from a pilot scale
test.

-------
                                         -313-
   10"
 10
 01
 u
 o
 n
 •1-4


 I 10-12

 •a
 t*
 0)
 1—I
 V
 o
• o
 TJ
 C
 a)

 to
 C
 o
 +•»
 •s
 (a
 0)
 o
 fc
 (1)
 u
 rt
                            Gravitational Attraction for a 50jU Water Droplet
                                                             •3.0  —
   10
     -13
102i
                                                             -0.3  —
   10
     -14
10g
                                                                         0.03
         0
        20
                    40          60          80

                      Separation Distance, fj.
                                                                   100
                                                                      H
                                                                      m
                                                                      i

                                                                      3
                                                                      I-'-
                                                                      D
                                                                      P)
                                                                      o
                                                                      o
                                                                      i-*.
                                                                      r+
                                                                      <
                                                                       o
                                                                       o
                                                                       03
                                                                       r+
                                                                       »-*•

                                                                       O

                                                                       3
                                                                       i
                                                                       o
                                                                       1^

                                                                       CO

                                                                       o
        Figure 14.1.
           The Electrostatic Force between a 10u Water Droplet and

            a 0. 5jU Dust Particle Charged to Saturation in an Electric

            Field of 6 kV/cm.
                                                            SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -314-
14. 2  ELECTROSTATICALLY AUGMENTED PACKED BED FILTERS

      A packed bed filter is a particulate emission control device that is
comprised of a column of loosely packed fibers, gravel or other filter ma-
terial.  The dust laden gases flow through this  filter column to provide the
opportunity for the dust particles to be collected on the filter medium.   These
packed bed filters  characteristically provide rather poor efficiency for small
particles.

      The  collection efficiency for this type of collector can be increased by
the use of  electrostatic  augmentation.  If the filtration region is immersed
in an electrostatic field, the dust particles will be driven in a direction that
tends to increase the probability of impact between the particles and the fil-
ter medium.

      If the dust particles are initially uncharged,  the  electric field will  in-
duce an electrical  dipole in each particle which tends to align each particle
with the electric field.3'4  This tends to orient the  particle in such a way
that the negative end of  the dipole contacts  the positive surface charge of
the filter medium,  and similarly, the positive ends tend to contact the nega-
tive surface charge of the medium (see Figure  14.1).  The result of this is
that the collection  efficiency is increased somewhat by the attractive force
between the dust particles  and the filter medium.

      The  filtration efficiency of packed bed filters can be further enhanced
if the dust particles are electrically charged prior to introduction in the  col-
lector.  If charged particles are introduced into the filter medium with a
superimposed electric field, the dust particles are driven in the direction
of the  electric field.   Thus, the probability of collection and the retentive
forces for the dust particles are both increased by the addition of the elec-
trostatic augmentation.

      Particle collection theory for  turbulent flow  electrostatic precipita-
tion shows that particles are captured only in the boundary layer of the
gas stream adjacent  to the collection electrodes.   In conventional electro-
static precipitators,  the interelectrode space is largely inactive for par-
ticle collection.  This problem is significantly reduced in the augmented
packed filter bed collector since the entire surface of the filter medium
acts as the collection surface.   This results in a significant increase in
the collection area for a given volume of collector in comparison to that  for
a conventional precipitator.

-------
                                    -315-


      The advantage of the loose packed filter bed is the low pressure drop
required to maintain the gas flow.  It seems probable  from the above consid-
erations that a reasonably high collection efficiency, even for the small par-
ticles, can be attained with electrostatic augmentation.

      An obvious disadvantage to the electrostatically augmented bed filter
is the inability of the system to be rapped for dust removal.  The dust col-
lector would require back flushing or filter media recycling for cleaning.


14.3  FABRIC FILTER

      The collection efficiency and pressure drop in a fabric filter are
related to the open area in the fabric and dust layer.  As dust builds up
in the fabric,  the open area decreases leading to an increased collection
efficiency and pressure  drop.  The efficiency of a fabric filter is essen-
tially constant for a given dust and the resultant pressure drop is depen-
dent on the gas flow rate.

      Electrostatic augmentation of a fabric filter can take  the form of
charging the dust particles or establishing an electrostatic  field across
the dust layer, or both.   The action of the  electrostatic field  is to provide
a force between the dust particle and the dust layer  such that openings
appear to be smaller.  Particles that would otherwise  pass  through the
dust layer are therefore trapped, resulting in a somewhat higher efficien-
cy and pressure drop.

      Only limited studies have been made of electrostatic augmentation of
fabric filters;  the principal advantage noted has been a decrease in the time
required to establish a dust layer and hence less time required to reach
ultimate efficiency.   Other studies have largely been inconclusive.
14.4  MECHANICAL COLLECTION

      Consideration has been given to electrostatic augmentation of mechan-
ical collection;  however, since the mechanical collectors are basically of
high gas flow type, there would appear to be little advantage to the addition
of electrostatic augmentation since:
                                                     SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -316-
      (1)  the area of collecting surface would he small  relative l.o
          the gas flow, hence in the standard efficiency equation,
          the contribution of the electrostatic field to the efficiency
          would be small; and

      (2)  the tendency toward reentrainment would be large.
14. 5  SPACE CHARGE PRECIPITATION

      Conventional electrostatic precipitator theory shows that the migration
velocity of charged particles suspended in an electric field is proportional
to the product of their charge and the value of the electric field as given by

                     w =  qEp/6na7]                               (14.1)

where q is the charge on the particle in Coulombs, E   is the value of the
electric field in the collection zone in volts per meter, a is the radius of
the particle in meters, and TJ is  the viscosity of the gas in kg-meter-second.
This  basic equation is valid for the particle velocity independent of the me-
chanisms used for either providing the charge or establishing the electric
field.

      The space  charge precipitator5'6'7 utilizes the distributed space charge
of the charged particles,  sometimes augmented by additional space charges
provided by the introduction of charged water droplets as the source of the
collection electric field.  Conventional electrostatic precipitators  of either
the single-stage  or two-stage type utilize collection electrodes  connected to
high voltage  power supplies in addition to this space charge to provide the
collection field.

      The motivation for the development of space charge precipitators is
to simplify the electrical requirements in the collection zone of the instal-
lation.  Space charge precipitation is not a new concept in precipitation.
The space charge has always contributed to the electric field in the collec-
tion zone; but the removal  of that component of the collection field caused
by the high voltage power supply  is a new embodiment.  However,  it should
be pointed out that the value of the electric field in the collection zone will
always be smaller for the space charge collector than would result from a
conventional precipitator of the same dimensions if all other factors remain

-------
                                     -31T-
the same.   The removal of the electrical contributions from the power sup-
ply will result in a reduction in the collection fiel-d.  Since the migration ve-
locity is proportional to the collection field,  this results in a decrease in the
migration velocity.   Therefore, it must be understood that the purpose for
pursuing the development of space charge precipitators  is to simplify the de-
sign of precipitators, not to improve their performance.

      Two factors can be used to promote the development of space charge
precipitators.   The first is the absence  of back corona in the collection zone
and the second is the reduction of reentrainment when charged water droplets
are utilized as part of the space charge.  But it must be pointed out that these
factors are not peculiar to space charge collectors.  It is  common knowledge
that wet wall precipitators reduce the reentrainment of collected particles
and that back corona is  related to the current density and resistivity of the
dust particles on the collection electrodes.   Therefore,  there are methods
other than space charge precipitation available for the solution  of these
specialized problems.

      The electric field in the collection zone of a wire and pipe precipitator
as  determined from  conventional theory is

                                                            J*     (14. 2)
where E(r) is the electric field value as a function of the radius r; r0 is the
radius of the corona glow region; i is the current per unit length  of the
corona wire; p and pj are the respective space charges, total and ionic;
jLij is the  mobility of the free ions; g0 is the permittivity of free space, and
E0 is the  breakdown field  strength of the gas in the precipitator.   This equa-
tion shows that the electric field is caused by both the electrostatic term and
the space charge term.

      In the absence of an applied voltage,  the electric field is caused ex-
clusively by the distributed space charge.  Gauss' law can be used to eval-
uate the value  of the field for this special case.  Thus

                   Jf0Eds = q.                                      (14.3)

For the wire and pipe case,  where  the electric field is everywhere normal
to the surface  of the  pipe and uniform,  Equation 14. 3  reduces  to
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                     -318-
where E is the value of the electric field at the pipe; q is the total space
charge enclosed within the surface which is equal to the product of the space
charge density, p, and the volume irr2h; A is the surface area of the cylinder;
and €0 is previously defined.

      A similar derivation for the parallel plate configuration yields

                     E (parallel)  = -&•                               (14.5)
                                  2e0
where h is the distance between the plates.

      Equations 14.4 and 14.5 show  that the value of the electric field is
linearly related to the  plate separation for a uniform charge density situation.
Thus,  theoretically,  the collection efficiency for a space charge precipitator
is independent of plate spacing.   As  the plate spacing increases, the electric
field increases, which results in a linear increase in migration velocity,  thus
maintaining a constant collection efficiency. However, this collection effi-
ciency is  always less than that which theory predicts for a conventional pre-
cipitator since the electric field is increased by the applied voltage field.

      Equations 14. 4 and 14. 5 show  that the collection  electric field is directly
proportional to the space charge  density for space charge precipitators.  As
the particles that provide the space charge  are collected,  the space charge
density is reduced.   The result of this is that the  collection electric field is
reduced by the amount of precipitate  collected as  the gas proceeds through
the collector.  The migration velocity and incremental collection efficiency
approach  zero as  the total material collected approaches 100%.

      This problem is  overcome  in some instances by the injection of charged
water  droplets at various positions within the collector.  This technique re-
duces  the problem of a reduced space charge, but does not eliminate it.

      Some problems are encountered in the formation of these charged
droplets.  Spray nozzles typically form droplets  of too great a diameter,
while grown condensation nuclei require considerable equipment as well as
additional corona  sections.

-------
                                   -319-
      Some merit is attributable to space charge precipitators in that the
construction of the collection electrode system is simplified.  This tech-
nique may find an application for the collection of particulate from small
gas volume installations where extremely high collection efficiencies are
not required.

      A special case of the space charge precipitator that has been investi-
gated utilizes laminar flow in the collection zone.7  Since the collection effi-
ciency of the space  charge precipitator is independent of plate  spacing, it
is theoretically possible to build a collector with laminar flow  rather than
with the turbulent flow conditions existing in conventional installations.  The
motivation for this development is that the  collection efficiency for laminar
flow precipitation is linearly related to the  collection electrode area to volume
flow ratio rather than the exponential ratio  associated with the  Deutsch-
Anderson equation for turbulent flow. Whereas the Deutsch-Anderson equa-
tion relates  as follows:


      T,  = 1  - exp(-^-w)                                         (14.6)
                      s

the laminar  flow equation can be stated as

      „  _  A
          Vg
               w.
Thus it can be seen that the laminar flow equation predicts a 100%  collection
efficiency when — becomes equal to the reciprocal  of the migration velocity.
                 o

      Initially,  this approach appears to be extremely desirable.  However,
when viewed in the light of attainable migration velocities, some difficulties
with the approach become apparent.  Again, calling on conventional theory,
the migration velocity is

      w = qEp/67ra7]

From Equation 14. 5,  the electric field for the parallel plate configuration is
Plate separations from laminar flow must be maintained at about 0.1 in.  ^
2 5 x 10~3 meter.  The space charge density can be estimated for a reason-
able dust loading of about 10 grains/it3 = 2.3 x 10"5 gm/cm3 = 0. 23 gm/m3.
If this dust loading is brought about by a lju  diameter particle with a density
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                    -320-
of 3 gm/cm3,  the number of particles per unit volume is determined by divid
ing the weight per unit volume of the gas by the weight of one particle.  The
weight and volume of unit density particles differ by a factor of 3.
                = jir (5 x lO'5 cm)3 =    - x  ID'" = 5. 22 x 10'13 cm3
                                      o
The number of particles per cm is

                                     • 4. 4, I* ,»„.«.../.»•
               =  4.4 x 1013 particles/ m3

      The charge per unit volume is estimated from the product of the charge
per particle and the particle concentration.  Assume a reasonable value of a
charging field on the order  of 5 x 105 V/m.  The saturation charge for Iji
particles is about 260 electrons /particle = 4.2 x 10~17 Coulombs/particle.
Thus,

      p  =  space charge density = 1. 4 x 107  part/ cms x 4. 2 x 10~17 Cou/part

         »  5.90x 10'10Cou/cm3 = 5.90x  10"4 Cou/m3

Substituting into Equation 14. 5

      E  -   5.90xl(PCou/nfx2.5xlO-3meter  =  0 83 x 10s V/m
                  2 x 8.85x 10-12 F/m

         =  8.3 x 104 V/m = 830 V/cm

Customary values for the collection electric field range from 2-6 kV/cm.

      The migration velocity for a particle collected  in a  field of 800 V/cm
will be only one-fifth of that for one collected in a field of 4 kV/cm.  Thus,
the collection electrode area for a laminar flow space charge collector
would be approximately the same as for a  conventional turbulent flow col-
lector for a collection efficiency of 99%.

      If the laminar flow collector were contemplated for collecting larger
particles, the problem becomes more acute.  The space  charge from large
particles is reduced if the  same dust loading is used.  For  example, if

-------
                                   -321-
    particles are used in theprevious example, the volume of one particle
is increased by a factor of 1(T, while the charge per particle is increased
by a factor of I0a for a net reduction in space charge of a factor of 10 to
83 V/cm.

      Electrostatic precipitation theory shows that the migration velocity of
a charged particle suspended in an electric field is proportional to the pro-
duct of the charge on the particle and the value of the electric field.  In this
example, the charge on the particle is of the same order of magnitude that
would be encountered in conventional precipitators.  The value of the  collec-
tion electric field is about one-tenth that in conventional collectors.  There-
fore, the migration velocity of the particles would be only one-tenth that for
conventional precipitators.

      The idea of approaching laminar flow in the collection zone  does have
some merit, but the practical matter of constructing commercial sizes of
these units with plate spacings of 0.1  in. places an extremely tight manu-
facturing tolerance on the installation.
                                                      SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE

-------
                                  -322-
                               CHAPTER 14
                             BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.    Joubert, Jacques,  "Contribution to the Problem of Determination
      of the Trajectory of a Conducting Particle Placed in a
      Hydrodynamic Field and an Electric Ionizing Field, " University
      of Lyon, France.

2.    Walker, A. B.,  "Enhanced Scrubbing of Black Liquor Boiler
      Fume by Electrostatic Pre-Agglomeration, "JAPCA 1.3,  No. 12,
      p 622 (December 1963).

3.    Zebel, G., "Deposition of Aerosol Flowing Past a Cylindrical
      Fiber in a Uniform Electric Field, " J. Colloid Sci. 20,  pp 522-
      543 (1965).

4.    Mazumder, M. K.  and Thomas,  K.  T., "Improvement of the
      Efficiency of Particulate Filler by Superimposed Electrostatic
      Forces, " Filtration and Separation, p 25 (Jan-Feb 1967).

5.    Faith,  L.,  etal.,  "Particle Precipitation by Space Charge in
      Tubular Flow, " Ind.  Eng.  Chem. Fund. 6, p 519  (1957).

6.    Webber, M. E., "Experimental  Studies on Space-Charge
      Precipitation, " thesis submitted to the University of California
      at Berkeley (September 5, 1969).

7.    Hanson, D. N. and Wilke, C. R., "Electrostatic Precipitator
      Analysis, " Department of Chemical Engineering,  University of
      California at Berkeley.

-------