from the National Air Surveillance Networks
and
Contributing State and Local Networks
Revised 1971
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-------
AIR QUALITY DATA FOR 1967
from the
National Air Surveillance Networks
Revised 1971
Division of Atmospheric Surveillance
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27709
August 1971
-------
The APTD (Air Pollution Technical Data) series of reports is issued by the Office
of Air Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, to report technical data of
interest to a limited number of readers. Copies of APTD reports are available
free of charge - as supplies permit - from the Office of Technical Information and
Publications, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711 or from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port
Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22151.
0741
Office of Air Programs Publication No. APTDl
ii
-------
PREFACE
The Division of Atmospheric Surveillance of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) with the assistance and cooperation of state and local agencies,
carries on a variety of air sampling activities to obtain information about the air
quality in the United States. This report summarizes data on particulate and
gaseous pollutants gathered during 1967 at the cooperating stations of the various
National Air Surveillance Networks (NASN) and similar data from independent
state and local sampling networks that have contributed their results to the central
air quality data bank, operated by the Division of Atmospheric Surveillance. The
data on chemical components by the particulate matter in the air are generally for
1966, because of the necessary time lag in laboratory analysis, or for earlier
years in cases in which previously gathered samples held in reserve have been
retrospectively analyzed.
111
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The data reported in this publication could not have been gathered without the
generous cooperation of the many state and local air pollution control agencies in
the operation of the NASN sampling stations. The Environmental Protection
Agency offers sincere thanks to these organizations and to their employees.
Gratitude is also due the agencies that have contributed their own data to the
Administration's air quality data bank for use in this and other reports and studies.
Their efforts make possible a greatly increased national knowledge of air quality.
The names of these supporting agencies are listed below, by state.
California
California State Department of Public Health
Santa Clara County Health Department
Colorado
Boulder County Health Department
Boulder Health Department
Colorado State Health Department
Denver Building Department
El Paso County Health Department
Jefferson County Health Department
Larimer County Health Department
Las Animas Huerfano District Health Department
Mesa County Health Department
Northeast Colorado Health Department
Pueblo Health Department
Tri-County Health Department
Weld County Health Department
Connecticut
Connecticut State Department of Health
Florida
Florida State Board of Health
Georgia ;
Georgia Department of Public Health
Illinois
Cook County Air Pollution Control Bureau
Rockford City Department of Public Health
Springfield Department of Public Health
Massachusetts
Brockton City Health Department
-------
Massachusetts (continued)
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Springfield City Health Department
New York
City of New York, Department of Air Pollution Control
Elmira City Maintenance Department
Erie County Health Department
Glen Cove City Department of Public Works
Monroe County Health Department
Schenectady City Health Department
State of New York, Department of Health
Utica City Health Department
Ohio
City of Cincinnati, Division of Air Pollution Control and
Heating Inspection
City of Steubenviile Air Pollution Bureau
Lorain City Department of Public Service
Ohio Department of Health
South Carolina
South Carolina Pollution Control Authority
Texas
Austin City County Health Department
Health Department of Pasadena
Houston City Health Department
Texas State Department of Health
Washington
Clark County Air Pollution Control Authority
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency
Snohomish County Health Department
Washington State Health Department
Wisconsin
Wisconsin State Board of Health
VI
-------
CONTENTS
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION 1
SUMMARY OF AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS 3
Particulate Averages by Population Class 3
CAMP Data on Gaseous Pollutants 3
Emission Data 3
Table 1 -1. National Summary of Air Quality Data 4
Table 1-2. Minimum Detectable Concentration of Inorganic
Constituents 5
Table 1-3. Distribution of Cities by Population Class and Particulate
Concentration, 1957 through 1967 6
Table 1-4. Distribution of Selected Nonurban Monitoring Sites by
Category of Urban Proximity, 1961 through 1966 ... 7
Table 1-5. Summary of Average Concentrations of Gaseous Pollutants
at CAMP Stations 7
Table 1-6. Days with Maximum Hourly Oxidant Concentrations
Equal to or Greater than Specified Concentrations . . 9
Table 1-7. Nationwide Emissions of Major Pollutants in 1966 . • 10
GUIDE TO SITE DESCRIPTION LISTING 11
DESCRIPTION OF DATA TABLES 13
LABORATORY METHODOLOGY 17
Suspended Particulate Matter 17
Organic Particulate Matter 17
Figure 1-1. Effects of Relative Humidity on Weight of Atmospheric
Particulates at 75°F 18
Nonmetallic Inorganic Constituents 18
Metals 19
Gases 19
Soiling Index 20
SECTION 2. URBAN AND NONURBAN SUSPENDED PARTICULATE
MATTER
Table 2-1. Suspended Particulate Matter, Urban Frequency
Distributions 23
Table 2-2. Suspended Particulate Matter, Nonurban Frequency
Distributions 35
SECTION 3. URBAN AND NONURBAN BENZENE-SOLUBLE
ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
Table 3-1. Benzene-Soluble Organic Constituents, Urban
Quarterly and Yearly Averages 39
Table 3-2. Benzene-Soluble Organic Constituents, Frequency
Distributions from Contributing Networks 42
Table 3-3. Benzene-Soluble Organic Constituents, Nonurban
Quarterly and Yearly Averages 45
Table 3-4. Benzo(a)pyrene, Urban Quarterly and Yearly Averages . . 46
Table 3-5. Benzo(a)pyrene, Nonurban Quarterly and Yearly
Averages. . . 49
vii
-------
SECTION 4.
Table 4-1
Table 4-2
Table 4-3
Table 4-4
Table 4-5
Table 4-6
Table 4-7
Table 4-8
SECTION 5.
URBAN AND NONURBAN NONMETALLIC INORGANIC
CONSTITUENTS
. Ammonium, Urban Frequency Distributions
. Ammonium, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
. Fluorides, Urban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions . .
. Fluorides, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions.
. Nitrates, Urban Frequency Distributions
. Nitrates, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
. Sulfates, Urban Frequency Distributions
. Sulfates, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
URBAN AND NONURBAN METALS
Table 5-1. Antimony, Urban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions . .
Table 5-2. Antimony, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions .
Table 5-3. Beryllium 1966 Urban Quarterly Composites
Table 5-4. Beryllium 1966 Nonurban Quarterly Composites
Table 5-5. Bismuth, Urban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions . . .
Table 5-6. Bismuth, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions .
Table 5-7. Cadmium, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-8. Cadmium, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions .
Table 5-9. Chromium, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-10. Chromium, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-11. Cobalt, Urban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions. . . .
Table 5-12. Cobalt, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions . .
Table 5-13. Copper, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-14. Copper, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-15. Iron, Urban Frequency Distributions ...
Table 5-16. Iron, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-17. Lead, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-18. Lead, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-19. Manganese, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-20. Manganese, Nonurban Frequency Distributions . ....
Table 5-21. Molybdenum, Urban Abbreviated Frequency Distribution's .
Table 5-22. Molybdenum, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency
Distributions
Table 5-23. Nickel, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-24. Nickel, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-25. Tin, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-26. Tin, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency Distributions . . .
Table 5-27. Titanium, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-28. Titanium, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-29. Vanadium, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-30. Vanadium, Nonurban Abbreviated Frequency
Distributions
Table 5-31. Zinc, Urban Frequency Distributions
Table 5-32. Zinc, Nonurban Frequency Distributions
SECTION 6. GASEOUS POLLUTANTS AND SOILING INDEX
Figure 6-1. Annual Frequency Distributions of Carbon Monoxide,
- CAMP 1967
Table 6-1. Carbon Monoxide Annual Frequency Distributions,
CAMP 1967
Figure 6-2. Annual Frequency Distributions of Nitric Oxide, CAMP 1%7.
Table 6-2. Nitric Oxide Annual Frequency Distributions, CAMP 1967.
53
61
63
68
70
78
80
89
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
127
127
128
128
Vlll
-------
Figure 6-3. Annual Frequency Distributions of Nitrogen Dioxide,
CAMP 1967 129
Table 6-3. Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Frequency Distributions,
CAMP 1967 129
Figure 6-4. Annual Frequency Distributions of Sulfur Dioxide,
CAMP 1967 130
Table 6-4. Sulfur Dioxide Annual Frequency Distributions,
CAMP 1967 130
Figure 6-5. Annual Frequency Distributions of Total Hydrocarbons,
CAMP 1967 131
Table 6-5. Total Hydrocarbons Annual Frequency, CAMP 1967 . . . 131
Figure 6-6. Annual Frequency Distributions of Total Oxidants,
CAMP 1967 132
Table 6-6. Total Oxidants Annual Frequency Distributions,
CAMP 1967 132
Table 6-7. Carbon Monoxide, Daily Averages, 1967 133
Table 6-8. Nitric Oxide, Daily Averages, 1967 136
Table 6-9. Nitrogen Dioxide, Daily Averages, 1967 139
Table 6-10. Sulfur Dioxide, Daily Averages, 1967 142
Table 6-11. T.otal Hydrocarbons, Daily Averages, 1967 145
Table 6-12. Total Oxidants, Daily Averages, 1967 147
Table 6-13. Aldehydes, 24-hour Bubbler 150
Table 6-14. Nitrogen Dioxide, 24-hour Bubbler 152
Table 6-15. Sulfur Dioxide, 24-hour Bubbler 154
Table 6-16. Frequency Distributions of Hourly Sulfur Dioxides in
New York City in 1967 156
Table 6-17. Lead Candle Sulfation Rate, National Air Surveillance
Networks, 1967 157
Table 6-18. Soiling Index, Daily Averages, 1967 159
APPENDIX
AIR QUALITY DATA SAMPLING SITES 165
IX
-------
SECTION 1.
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
-------
AIR QUALITY DATA, 1967
(REVISED)
INTRODUCTION
Today's National Air Surveillance Networks (NASN) have developed from the
Public Health Service's first air pollution sampling effort. In 1953, the Public
Health Service's Division of Sanitary Engineering Services, in cooperation with
various state and local agencies, began sampling for suspended particulate matter
with high-volume air samplers in 17 cities. By 1956, this sampling program had
expanded to encompass 66 communities, and a national need and desire to have a
larger, truly national air quality sampling effort had become apparent. As a
result, the National Air Sampling Network (presently called the National Air Sur-
veillance Networks) was established in January of 1957, to routinely monitor sus-
pended particulate matter in urban and nonurban America. The scope of sampling
was expanded to some 185 urban and 48 nonurban stations, of which about 100 of the
urban and all of the nonurban stations were scheduled to operate each year. The
number of urban stations operating in 1967 was 127; the number of nonurban stations
was 30.
Since 1957, network operations have expanded also in the number and types of
pollutants measured. The constituent pollutants measured in particulate samples
collected by high-volume air samplers are listed in Table 1-1. During 1959 and
I960, limited 24-hour bubbler sampling for the gases nitrogen dioxide (NO2> and
sulfur dioxide (SC>2) began at a few stations. The number of stations has since
increased to 50, and operations have been experimentally expanded to sample for
aldehydes, ammonia, and total oxidants, in addition to the original two gases. The
Continuous Air Monitoring Projects, begun in 1962, gather detailed data in six
cities where continuously operating instruments record levels of gaseous carbon
monoxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, total hydrocarbons, and
total oxidants every 5 minutes. ,
In 1966, a 25-station lead peroxide candle network began operation to provide
sulfation rate information and to permit comparative studies of this traditional,
inexpensive SOx monitoring method. The network operated 42 stations in 1967, and
the data are included herein. Since then, the operations have been suspended in
favor of additional efforts in the more definite types of sampling.
With the reorganization of the Public Health Service on January 1, 1967, the
network sampling operations were collectively designated the National Air Surveil-
lance Networks and were incorporated in the Air Quality and Emission Data
-------
Program of the National Center for Air Pollution Control (NCAPC), in the Bureau
of Disease Prevention and Environmental Control of the Public Health Service.
In July 1968, the National Center was redesignated the National Air Pollution
Control Administration (NAPCA) under the Consumer Protection and Environmental
Health Service; and in January 1969, the Air Quality and Emission Data Program
was redesignated the Division of Air Quality and Emission Data (DAQED). In
December 1970 NAPCA became a part of the newly-established Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), and DAQED became the Division of Atmospheric Sur-
veillance (DAS). Together with other EPA divisions DAS conducts numerous
special studies involving air sampling, but the majority of the EPA air quality
surveillance data is collected by the National Air Sampling Network (NASN): the
suspended particulate matter, or Hi-vol network; the gas-sampling network; and
the continuous Air Monitoring Projects (CAMP).
These networks are operated in cooperation with appropriate state or local
agencies. The Division of Atmospheric Surveillance generally provides equipment,
supplies, and laboratory analytical services, and the cooperating agency provides
the sampling site and the manpower. In addition to assisting the EPA sampling
program, many state and local air pollution control agencies operate their own
monitoring networks in support of their own air pollution control programs. Many
such agencies contribute their data to EPA's air quality data bank, and these data
are included in EPA publications.
-------
SUMMARY OF AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS
This report presents brief summaries and analyses in addition to basic data
tabulations. This section presents national summaries of pollutant levels, and
figures illustrating variations in the levels of gaseous pollutants.
Summarized in Table 1-1 are data on suspended particulate matter and on
three gases routinely measured at the Z4-hour gas sampling stations: sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, and aldehydes. Total oxidants and ammonia were measured on
an experimental basis in 1967, but no data are reported here.
PARTICULATE AVERAGES BY POPULATION CLASS
Table 1-3 presents a distribution of NASN and contributing agency stations in
401 cities with respect to the 1957 through 1967 average suspended particulate
matter and population. Nine population classes are defined, in addition to 10 ranges
of average particulate concentration with the overall range of from less than 40
Hg/m3 to more than 200 |Ag/m . The number of cities for each combination of
population class and particulate level is given, along with totals for each population
class and particulate level. Clearly, the larger cities have no monopoly on the
upper range of particulate concentration.
Table 1-4 considers 25 nonurban sites and categorizes them both by particu-
late levels and by urban proximity.
CAMP DATA ON GASEOUS POLLUTANTS
Annual averages for each of the six CAMP stations for the last 5 years, 1963
through 1967, are summarized in Table 1-5. Because these stations are too few
in number to represent a national average, the CAMP data do not appear in Table
1-1.
Because the formation of photochemical oxidant is so directly dependent on
sunlight, averages that include levels during nighttime hours may appear deceptive-
ly low. For this reason, Table 1-6 lists for each city the number of days in which
at least one hourly average total oxidant concentration exceeded 0. 05, 0. 10, and
0. 15 ppm. This summary gives some indication of the frequency of photochemical
smog. Data for the last 4 years, 1964 through 1967, are presented. Previously
published summaries of 1964 through 1965 oxidant may be slightly different from
the summaries in. Table 1-6 because some summaries in the past excluded maxi-
mum hourly concentrations not occurring between 11:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. , and
considered instead the highest hourly value occurring during this 6-hour interval.
EMISSION DATA
Estimates of nationwide emissions for five pollutants are presented in Table
1-7. The data are for 1966, except the sulfur oxides data, which are for 1967.
Some of the totals are higher than previous NAPCA estimates, because of the
inclusion of sources not previously considered. For example, emission estimates
have been included for forest fires, burning coal refuse banks, and an increased
-------
Table 1-1. NATIONAL SUMMARY OF AIR QUALITY DATA
, except as noted)
Pol lutant
Suspended participate matter (196?)
Fractions
Benzene-soluble organic (196?)
Benzo(a)pyrene (1967, ng/m3)
Ammonium (1966)
Ammonium (1967)
Nitrate (1966)
Nitrate (1967)
Sulfate (1966)
Sulfate (1967)
Gases
Nitrogen dioxide (1967)
Sulfur dioxide (1967)
Urban
Number
of stations
316
182
115
100
118
100
118
120
128
47
47
Arithmetic
average
97
6.4
2.64
0.9
1.2
1.7
1.8
9.9
9.4
148
61
Maximum
station
average
299
19.7
9.83
8.2
10.1
5.2
4.8
27.2
32.2
336
364
Nonurban
No.
of
stations
3*»
29
30
29
30
29
30
29
30
Arithmetic
average
35
2.4
0.29
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
4.8
4.5
Maximum
station
average
61
5.1
2.10
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.2
10.1
10.9
-------
Table 1-2. MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONS OF
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS3
(ug/m3)
Metal
Antimony
Beryl 1 ium
Bismuth
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
1 ron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Tin
Ti tan ium
Vanadium
Zinc
Nonmetal
Ammonium
Fluoride
Nitrate
Sulfate
Urban
0.04
0.0002
0.001
0.01
0.006
0.006
0.01
0.08
0.04
0.01
0.003
0.006
0.006
0.002
0.003
0.2
Urban
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.6
Nonurban
0.006
0.00007
0.0002
0.0005
0.0002
0.0002
0.002
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.0005
0.002
0.002
0.00048
0.0005
0.0003
Nonurban
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.6
Sensitivity to metals in nonurban samples can be
greater for two reasons. First, because of low'con-
centrations, inter-element interferences are minimized.
Second, since total accumulated material is less than
in the urban samples, the sample extract is prepared
in a more concentrated form to increase sensitivity.
number of industrial process sources. The increasing availability of new and
revised emission factors and additional basic data sources are making better esti-
mates possible.
The estimates of particulate emissions should be viewed with two qualifica-
tions in mind. First, a significant portion of particulate emissions is under some
sort of control, but the extent and efficiency of such controls have not been evalu-
ated on a national basis. Second, emissions of particulate matter from many
processes and activities have not been defined quantitatively.
The current rate of emission for sulfur oxides is expected to remain essen-
tially unchanged. Increases in the use of sulfur - containing fuels should be offset,
on a national scale, by the shift to fuels with lower sulfur content in some areas
of the country.
The estimate of hydrocarbon emissions is known to be incomplete. The
industrial process loss category includes only petroleum refineries and coking
operations because data are not available for several other major sources such
as the petrochemical industries.
-------
Table 1-3. DISTRIBUTION OF CITIES BY POPULATION CLASS
AND PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION, 1957 THROUGH 196?
Population
Class
Over 3 mi 1 1 ion
1-3 mi 1 1 ion
0.7-1 mi 1 1 ion
400-700,000
100-400,000
50-100,000
25-50,000
10-25,000
Under 10,000
Total
Average particulate concentration, ^g/mB
Less than
40
1
1
4o-
59
3
2
5
7
5
22
60-
79
1
7
20
2k
18
7
77
80-
99
It
30
28
12
19
15
108
100-
119
2
5
2k
16
12
9
11
79
120-
139
6
17
12
10
5
2
52
140-
159
1
2
4
1
12
6
2
2
1
31
160-
179
1
1
3
5
1
3
2
16
180-
199
1
1
2
1
2
1
8
More than
200
1
3
3
7
Total
2
3
7
18
99
93
71
64
44
401
-------
Table 1-4. DISTRIBUTION OF SELECTED NONURBAN MONITORING
SITES BY CATEGORY OF URBAN PROXIMITY, 1961 THROUGH 1966
Category
Near urban
Intermediate
Remote
Total nonurban
Average particulate concentration, /tg/m3
Less than
20
4
4
20-39
1
5
5
11
1*0-59
3
6
9
60-79
1
1
Total
5
11
9
25
Table 1-5. SUMMARY OF AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS OF GASEOUS
POLLUTANTS AT CAMP STATIONS
Carbon monoxide
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
New Orleans
Phi ladelphia
San Francisco
St. Louis
Washington,D.C.
Ni trie oxide
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
New Orleans
Phi ladelphia
San Francisco
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Nitrogen dioxide
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
New Orleans
Philadelphia
Arithmetic average, ppm
1963
a
a
a
a
5.4
6.9
0.097
0.032
0.015
0.046
0.087
0.039
0.041
0.030
0.017
0.039
1964
12.0
a
7.1
5.2
6.3
5.7
0.100
0.038
0.045
0.089
0.036
0.034
0.046
0.032
0.038
1965
17.1
4.0
7.2
8.1
6.5
3.7
0.096
0.031
0.033
0.049
0.026
0.032
0.043
0.035
0.036
0.037
1966
12.5
4.9
7.9
6.8
5.8
3-3
0.101
0.042
0.039
0.059
0.032
0.036
0.057
0.036
0.034
0.039
1967
a
5-6
7.6
6.3
5-6
4.9
0.072
0.032
0.037
0.063
0.035
0.047
0.050
0.028
0.037
0.043
-------
Table 1-5 (continued). SUMMARY OF AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS OF GASEOUS
POLLUTANTS AT CAMP STATIONS
Nitrogen dioxide (continued)
San Francisco
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Sulfur dioxide
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
New Orleans
Phi ladelphia
San Francisco
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Total hydrocarbons
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
New Orleans
Phi ladelphia
San Francisco
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Total oxidants
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
New Orleans
Phi ladelphia
San Francisco
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Arithmetic average, ppm
1963
0.049
0.034
0.150
0.026
0.008
0.070
0.009
0.047
3-2
3.3
a
2.5
2.7
2.8
Oxidant
data for
1963 not
included
because
of S02
inter-
ference.
1964
0.057
0.033
0.037
0.175
0.038
0.081
0.017
0.059
0.047
3.0
3.0
2.2
2.8
3.1
3.0
0.030
0.028
0.026
0.020
0.031
0.030
1965
0.026
0.035
0.130
0.030
0.019
0.084
0.047
0.046
2.6
2.8
2.5
2.2
2.9
2.1
0.026
0.033
0.033
0.026
0.032
0.028
1966
0.034
0.035
0.084
0.031
0.011
0.091
0.042
0.044
2.8
a
2.4
2.5
3.0
2.4
0.021
a
0.030
0.032
0.037
0.027
1967
0.024
0.043
0.125
a
0.005
0.098
0.029
a
3.0
2.5
2.4
2.4
a
a
0.029
0.031
a
0.026
0.035
O.C25
Average not calculated because of insufficient or poorly distributed data.
-------
Table 1-6. DAYS WITH MAXIMUM HOURLY OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN SPECIFIED CONCENTRATIONS
City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
Phi ladel phi a
St. Louis
Washington
Year
64
65
66
67
64
65
66
67
65
66
67
6k
65
66
67
64
65
66
67
6k
65
66
67
Days
valid
259
275
235
255
304
3)1
208
248
284
298a
I66a
293
261
315
282
254
328
292
289
292
281
325
322
0.15 ppm
Number
0
0
3
1
4
4
0
1
13
9
4
9
3
19
3
5
7
5
4
4
2
2
5
Per-
cent
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.4
1.3
1.3
0.0
0.4
4.6
3.0
2.4
3.1
1.1
6.0
1.1
2.0
2.1
1.7
1.4
1.4
0.7
0.6
1.6
0.10 pptn
Number
8
8
6
16
30
14
1
20
43
46
12
34
20
52
28
24
28
33
38
37
25
27
27
Per-
cent
3.1
2.9
2.6
6.3
9.9
4.8
0.5
8.1
15.1
15.4
7.2
11.6
7-7
16.5
9.9
9.4
8.5
11.3
13-1
12.7
8.9
8.3
8.4
0.05 ppm
Number
135
107
52
113
122
162
54
122
205
187
76
124
97
145
124
139
178
174
185
154
125
134
137
Per-
cent
52
39
22
44
40
52
26
49
72
63
46
42
37
46
44
55
54
60
64
53
45
41
43
aData for Denver 1967 are deceptively low because of low validity in
the summer months, when oxidan't Is typically high. There were only
5 valid days in May and none in June and July.
-------
Table 1-?. NATIONWIDE EMISSIONS OF MAJOR POLLUTANTS IN 1966
(millions of tons per year)
Source
Transportation
Fuel combustion in
stationary sources
Industrial processes
Solid waste disposal
Miscel laneous
Man-made
Forest fires
Total
CO
64.5
1.9
10.7
7.6
9.7
7.2
101.6
Particulate
1.2
9.2
7.6
1.0
2.9
6.7
28.6
.HC
17.6
0.7
3.5
1.5
6.0
2.2
31.5
NOX
7.6
6.7
0.2
0.5
0.5
1.2
16.7
S0xa
O.k
22.9
7.2
0.1
0.6
Nb
31.2
Data for 196?.
Values under 50,000 tons are marked "N," for negligible compared
with the total.
10
-------
GUIDE TO SITE DESCRIPTION LISTING
A list of sampling sites is presented in the Appendix. Information is given on
the location of each station - Federal, state, or local - listed in this publication.
In addition to the address of each site, the listing offers the type of site, population
or topographic class, height of sampler above ground level, the name of supporting
state or local agency, and either the county name (for urban sites) or a site name
abbreviation (for nonurban sites).
The site types are industrial (I), residential (R), commercial (C), suburban (S),
and nonurban (N); some sites are classified as combinations of two or more of
these categories. Nine population classes are used: 3, 000, 000+; 1, 000, 000 to
3, 000,000; 700, 000 to 1, 000, 000; 400, 000 to 700, 000; 100,000 to 400, 000; 50,000
to 100, 000; 25, 000 to 50, 000; 10, 000 to 25, 000; and under 10, 000. Eight topo-
graphic classes are used: Atlantic Coast, Desert, Farmland, Forest, Great Lakes
Coast, Mountain, and Pacific Coast. The codes for these population and topo-
graphic classes are defined in the Appendix.
11
-------
DESCRIPTION OF DATA TABLES
In this section the five basic formats of data presentation are described in some
detail. Following these descriptions, information concerning the type of data
appearing in each particular table is presented.
One of the major methods used to present data in this publication is the fre-
quency distribution table. The table lists for each site the year or years of sam-
pling covered, the number of valid samples taken, the minimum value, the nine
decile values, the maximum value, the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, and
the standard geometric deviation.
In 1967 the method of calculation of frequency distributions was changed as
part of the overall implementation of the DAQED national air quality data bank
computer system Storage and Retrieval of Air Quality Data (SAROAD). The fre-
quency distribution program was one of several that were rewritten to be compati-
ble with this new system. In this process, the method of calculating distributions
•was changed; the resulting distributions represent an improvement over those pro-
duced by the old program. The difference between the two programs follows.
Originally, because of computer limitations, a given set of values was divided
into 42 logarithmically determined ranges of pollutant concentration, and all values
in any given range were treated identically for the purpose of defining percentiles.
In each range, the mean value between the upper and lower limits of the range was
considered representative of all values in that range. This process was dictated
by the limited amount of space in the computer's memory. Percentile values,
therefore, were not always actual numbers contained among the original values;
and, if the distribution took on an unusual shape, the 90th percentile value occas-
sionally was reported to be greater than the actual maximum pollutant values,
which is of course impossible.
The new computer program analyzes the data individually. Specifically, all
data are arranged in order from the smallest to the largest value. They then are
divided into 10 groups as nearly equal in number of values as is possible.
Then the value reported for, say, the 40th percentile in the frequency distri-
bution is the smallest actual pollutant value satisfying the condition that 40 percent
of all pollutant values in the group of data are less than or equal to the stated
value. As an example, in a group of 26 values, the 10th percentile is represented
by the third smallest value. Twenty-six divided by 10 yields 2. 6, but there is no
2. 6th value, and, the third value is therefore chosen. Ten percent of all pollu-
tant values will be less than or equal to that third value. Similarly, the 20th per-
centile will be the 5. 2th, or the 6th value in the sequence.
Anomalies such as described earlier do not occur with this new program. The
arithmetic mean, geometric mean, and standard geometric deviation are reported
the same by the new program as they were by the old program.
13
-------
Since the program was changed, it has been used to produce frequency distri-
butions for both new and old data. In particular, newly computed frequency distri-
butions of data collected during or prior to 1966 may differ slightly from previously
calculated frequency distributions of such data.
A second format of data presentation is used in lieu of the frequency distribu-
tion table in those cases in which the vast majority of all data values have been
reported to be zero. This occurs for those pollutant fractions for which most
levels occurring in the ambient air are below the present minimum detectable
level. The abbreviated tables used to summarize data in these cases list, for
each site, the year or years of sampling, the number of samples collected, the
number of samples above the minimum detectable concentrations, and the maxi-
mum value among these detectable concentrations. This table format is used for
those metal fractions of suspended particulate matter that occur in low concentra-
tions (with respect to minimum detectable concentration), and for fluoride ion
concentrations.
Quarterly composite tables are used to report metallic, nonmetallic inorganic,
and organic fractions of suspended particulate matter from various stations in the
network. For each site, a chemically integrated average concentration value is
reported for each of the four quarters of the calendar year, and a yearly average
is reported for each year in which valid data for all four quarters were obtained.
A fourth type of table, used exclusively to summarize CAMP data for gaseous
pollutants and soiling index, is the table of daily averages. This table simply
lists for a particular pollutant.the average pollutant value, when valid, for each
day in the calendar year. For the gaseous pollutants, these values are averaged
from raw data compiled at 5-minute intervals. For soiling index, the sampling
period is 2 hours, so that up to 12 values are included in each soiling index daily
average value.
The fifth and final form in which data are presented is the frequency distribu-
tion table and graph combination. For each of the gaseous pollutants (carbon mono-
xide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, total hydrocarbons, and total
oxidants), a graph presents comparative curves showing the frequency distributions
of 5-minute values in the CAMP cities. Adjoining each of these figures is a nu-
merical tabulation of the same information.
For those tables reporting data from many sites (frequency distribution, abbre-
viated frequency distribution, and quarterly composite), the data are divided into
classes: data for urban sites and data for nonurban sites. Originally the distinc-
tion between urban and nonurban was fairly clear-cut; the growth and spread of
the United States population, however, has made these definitions somewhat
arbitrary. Generally, nonurban sites are labeled by county names, c. g. , Coco-
nino County, Arizona, and urban site names are not. However, some exceptions
do occur in both categories. Hence, the sites are separated into different tables
for urban sites and nonurban sites, so that the reader will know whether a. partic-
ular site is urban or nonurban.
This report is divided into six sections. Section 2 presents data on suspended
particulate matter, Section 3 covers the organic fractions of particulate matter,
and Section 4 covers the nonmetallic inorganic fractions. Section 5 covers the
metallic fractions of particulate matter, and Section 6 presents data on gaseous
pollutants and soiling index. The remainder of this discussion describes the con-
tent of these tables in more detail.
14
-------
Tables 2-1 and 2-2 present 1967 data on the concentrations of suspended partic-
ulate matter in the air. Data from urban sampling stations are presented in Table
2-1 as frequency distributions by site and city. Table 2-2 presents frequency dis-
tributions of data from nonurban stations. *
Tables 3-1 through 3-5 offer 1967 data on the portion of suspended particulate
matter that consists of benzene-soluble organic chemical compounds. The concen-
trations of benzene-soluble organic material from urban and nonurban stations are
presented in the first three tables.
Tables 3-4 and 3-5 present data on the concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the
particulate matter from urban and nonurban stations, respectively. Benzo(a)-
pyrene, one of the many specific organic compounds included in the benzene-solu-
ble fraction, is of sufficient interest to warrant separate determination because of
its carcinogenic, (cancer-causing) properties.
The unit used in reporting benzo(a)pyrene concentrations is different from that
used for other fractions of the particulate matter. Because it is present is extreme-
ly small amounts, benzo(a)pyrene is reported in nanograms (10~ * gram) per cubic
meter, rather than in micrograms (10~° gram) per cubic meter.
Tables 4-1 through 4-8 present the results of chemical analyses, for 1966 and
1967, of four nonmetallic inorganic groups. Data on ammonium, nitrate, and sul-
fate ions extracted from urban particulate matter samples are presented in fre-
quency distribution format in Tables 4-1, 4-5, and 4-7 respectively, and compar-
able data from nonurban stations appear in Tables 4-2, 4-6, and 4-8, respectively.
Beginning with this edition of Air Quality Data, data on water-soluble fluorides
are included. Such data from urban stations are offered in Table 4-3, and compar-
able nonurban data appears in Table 4-4.
Beginning with the 1966 Air Quality Data publication, reported concentrations
of metals have been measured in samples ashed with low-temperature (150e-200° C)
oxygen plasma asher. Recovery of several volatile metals, notably cadmium, lead,
and zinc is improved vith the new method, but use of the new method means that
concentrations reported here cannot be meaningfully related to concentrations
measured in samples ashed in a high-temperature muffle furnace and included in
publications prior to the 1966 edition of Air Quality Data.
Tables 5-1 through 5-32 present data on the concentrations of 16 metals in
suspended particulate samples collected at urban and nonurban sites during 1965
or earlier. These samples have been analyzed in retrospect. Because program-
ming of the new computer system data bank has not been completed at this printing,
data on metals for 1966, which would normally appear in this volume, have been
*In addition to the sites listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2, the following sites reported
sampling activity, but a representative year's data were not obtained:
Birmingham, Alabama; Joliet, Illinois; North Chicago, Illinois; New Albany,
Indiana; Dubuque, Iowa; Portland, Maine; Detroit, Michigan (site 02); Trenton,
New Jersey; Hamilton, New Jersey; Cincinnati, Ohio (sites 02, 31) Johnstown,
Pennsylvania; San Juan, Puerto Rico (sites Ql, 02); Sioux Falls, South Dakota,
Texas (sites 01, 02); and Burlington, Vermont.
15
-------
deferred to the 1968 edition. Beryllium data however, because of beryllium's high
biological activity, have been summarized in a special format in Tables 5-3 and
5-4. The odd-numbered tables in Section 5 present data from urban stations, while
the even-numbered tables present data from nonurban stations. The 16 metals
represented are antimony, beryllium, bismuth, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,
copper, iron, lead, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, tin, titanium, vanadium,
and zinc.. In most cases, the data are presented in frequency distribution format,
but in those cases -where detectable quantities of the metal are infrequently meas-
ured, the abbreviated summary format is used. In these cases, the reader should
refer to Table 1-2 for the minimum quantities in which metals are detectable in
urban and nonurban samples under average operating conditions. The degree of
interference from other substances determines the actual sensitivity in an individ-
ual analysis. In this publication a recorded concentration of zero means only that
the actual concentration was below the minimum detectable. However, in the cal-
culation of annual station averages, concentrations below the minimum detectable
are treated as zero concentrations.
Figures 6-1 through 6-6 and Tables 6-1 through 6-18 present various sum-
maries of gaseous pollutant data from three of the National Air Surveillance Net-
works: The Continuous Air Monitoring Projects (CAMP), the 24-hour gas-sampling
network, and the lead peroxide candle network.
The CAMP data are presented in Figures 6-1 through 6-6 as graphs of annual
frequency distributions of the basic 5-minute values recorded. Accompanying
each figure is a tabular listing of the same data in frequency distribution format.
Further, Tables 6-7 through 6-12 present daily arithmetic averages of the data for
each pollutant and for each city. The pollutants summarized are carbon monoxide,
nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, total hydrocarbons, and total oxi-
dants. The cities in which these were measured are Chicago, Cincinnati, Denver,
Philadelphia, St. Louis, and Washington, D. C. In St. Louis and Washington,
D. C., technical difficulties caused the hydrocarbon data gathered to be invalid.
Accordingly, graphs and tabular listings for these data do not appear in the text.
Data from the 24-hour gas sampling network on aldehydes, nitrogen dioxide,
and sulfur dioxide are presented in Tables 6-13, 6-14, and 6-15 respectively. The
gas bubbler samples are operated on a schedule of 26 randomly selected days per
year, as are the high-volume samplers.
Table 6-16 offers data from the 1967 operations of New York City's continuous
monitoring network for sulfur dioxide.
Table 6-17 presents the results of the operation of the lead candle network
during 1967. The lead candle provides an index of sulfation, which is determined
by the reaction of sulfur compounds with lead peroxide exposed to the air for 30
days.
The result is expressed in milligrams of sulfur trioxide per 100 square centi-
meters per day. The lead candle consists of a gauze sleeve impregnated with lead
peroxide and housed in a circular shelter to assure uniform directional exposure.
Finally, Table 6-18 presents daily average of soiling index concentrations at
the six CAMP stations during 1967.
16
-------
LABORATORY METHODOLOGY
SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
The weight or mass of particulate matter per volume of air is usually deter-
mined by drawing air through a weighed filter with a high-volume air sampler,
and then reweighing the soiled filter. Particular laboratory procedures, however,
may differ from one laboratory to another. The following procedure is used by
the Division of Air Quality and Emission Data for all sampling conducted by the
NASN.
Each city's high-volume sampler is located in the central business-commer-
cial district at a site that is, as nearly as practical, comparable with the corres-
ponding sites in other cities. In such a location, measured concentrations are
among the higher concentrations found in the city, and therefore cannot be inter-
preted as the citywide average. Contrasts between cities on a relative scale are
considered valid, however.
The high-volume samplers, operating at from 40 to 60 cubic feet per minute,
collect particles from about 2200 cubic meters of air during the 24-hour sampling
period. The NASN stations are operated during 26 randomly selected days per
year. The filters used are 8- by 10-inch flash-fired glass fiber filters selected
for low and uniform background concentrations of those substances to be measured.
To eliminate any filters having pinholes or other flaws that could affect air
flow, the filters are screened on a light table. Prior to weighing, they are equili-
brated for 24 hours at 75° F and 50 percent or less relative humidity. Because
any crease in a filter can seriously affect the airflow, filters are weighed with a
balance that permits weighing without bending.
The filters are then distributed unfolded to the cooperating local agencies.
After sampling, the filters are folded in half with the collected particulate matter
inside and returned to the laboratory. After a filter with the collected particulate
matter is again equilibrated for at least 24 hours at 75° F and 50 percent or less
relative humidity, it is weighed to determine the amount of particulate matter
collected. The equilibration at low relative humidity prior to this weighing is
crucial, because many of the compounds collected (ammonium sulfate in partic-
ular) are quite hygroscopic. Figure 1-1 shows the effect of humidity on the meas-
ured weights of soiled filters from three widely differing sampling locations. The
increase in weight at the higher humidities represents the amount of atmospheric
moisture collected by the particulate matter on the filters.
ORGANIC PARTICULATE MATTER
The numerous specific organic compounds that are removed by benzene
include many of the manmade organic pollutants. Natural organic airborne parti-
cles, such as pollens and molds, generally are not soluble in benzene.
Benzene-soluble organics are determined by extraction of aliquots of the
samples with redistilled benzene in a Soxhlet extractor for from 6 to 8 hours.
17
-------
600
500
400
300
UJ
200
100
1 I T
CHICAGO
0-—-o—-0-—0-—
ALTOONA. PA.
, __o—-O^ -O
JACKSON, MISS.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, %
Figure 1-1. Effects of relative humidity on weight of atmospheric
participates at 75 * F.
This extraction removes more than 90 percent of the benzene-soluble organic
materials from the sample. After extraction, the solution is concentrated and is
filtered into a tared test tube. The benzene solvent is then evaporated at 60° C,
and the organic matter remaining is weighed.
The benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) component of the benzene-soluble organic residue
is determined after first separating the different components by thin-layer chroma-
tography, then removing the BaP from the thin-layer plate and thin-layer adsor-
bent. The BaP is then dissolved in sulfuric acid and its concentration measured
by florescence spectroscopy.
NONMETALLIC INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
Analyses for ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate ions are conducted with Auto-
Analyzers* on an aqueous extract of an 8.3 percent aliquotof the particulate sample.
The sample aliquot is refluxed with 50 ml of distilled water in a 125-ml flask,
cooled and filtered, and then reextracted with 10 to 15 ml of water. In filtration
of this extract, the filter and flasks are washed to a total volume of 50 ml of fili-
trate, which is then mixed and used for the three analyses.
*Mention of a product or company name does not imply endorsement by the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency.
18
-------
Ammonium ion in the filtrate is determined by reaction with sodium phenolate
and a commercial 5. 25 percent stabilized sodium hypochlorite solution to produce
a blue complex. The intensity of the color of this complex is measured spectro-
photometrically at 425 millimicrons.
Nitrate ion in the filtrate is reduced to nitrite by alkaline hydrazine (pH
about 11). Sulfanilamide is then added to form a diazo compound, which is sub-
sequently combined with N-l -napthylethylenediamine. The resulting compound is
measured spectrophotometrically at 535 millimicrons. This method offers distinct
advantages in avoiding interferences from other water-soluble compounds found in
atmospheric particulate matter.
Sulfate ion in the filtrate is determined by the methylthymol blue method,
which is appropriate only with Auto-Analyzer techniques because the methylthymol
blue dye is oxidized by atmospheric oxygen. The filtrate is reacted with a reagent
consisting of equal parts of methylthymol blue dye and barium chloride, kept at a
pH of 2. 8 to prevent the formation of a chelate complex from the dye and the
barium. Any sulfate ion in the sample reacts with the barium, leaving an excess
of methylthymol blue dye that is proportional to the amount of sulfate present. The
pH is then raised to 12. 4, at which point the barium not removed by the sulfate
forms a chelate complex with the methylthymol blue dye and the excess dye turns
yellow. The intensity of the yellow color is then determined colorimetrically at
480 millimicrons.
Beginning with this Air Quality Data publication, data on water-soluble
fluorides are included. Measurement of the fluoride ion concentration in NASN
samples of suspended particulate matter has become practical by the adaptation
in the NAPCA laboratory of a recently developed fluoride selective electrode
technique.* The analysis is performed on an aliquot of the same water extract
prepared for the ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate analyses. A sodium citrate-
carbonate buffer solution is added to adjust the pH ionic strength and control
interferences from metal ions. The fluoride-selective electrode generates a
potential in proportion to the fluoride activity in the sample that is measured
against the potential of a standard reference electrode. The development of this
time-saving method, and a lower and more uniform amount of fluoride in the
glass-fiber filters, together have made it possible to include this constituent in
the routine analyses performed on network samples of suspended particulate
matter.
METALS
In the metals analysis an aliquot of the sample is ashed and then extracted
with a mixture of distilled hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. The manner of ashing
the sample is critical in the determination of the more volatile metals such as
lead, zinc, and cadmium. At one time samples were ashed in a muffle furnace at
500° C, but they are now ashed in a low-temperature asher (at about 150° C).
After ashing and extraction, metals contents of urban samples are determined
with an emission spectrograph.
GASES
The gas samples are gathered with a bubbler-train sampler. Air is drawn
successively through a membrane filter, a manifold, a bubbler, another filter, and
*M. S. Frant and J. W. Ross, Jr., "Electrode for Sensing Fluoride Ion Activity
in Solution, " Science. 145:1553-1554 (1966).
19
-------
finally a critical orifice. The membrane prefilter removes particulate matter; the
glass manifold permits the connection of up to five bubblers in parallel. The
bubbler itself is filled with the appropriate absorbing reagent and is followed by a
post-filter, which serves to protect the hypodermic needle critical orifice, which
controls the air flow. Following sample collection, the bubbler tubes are shipped
to the laboratories for analysis.
The analytical method used for sulfur dioxide is that of West and Gaeke with
the addition of sulfamic acid to the method modified for the Auto-Analyzer by Welch
and Terry. Sulfur dioxide is collected from the air sample by the complexing
action of sodium tetrachloromercurate and is determined colorimetrically by
measuring the red-violet color produced when a bleached rosaniline hydrochloride
solution and dilute aqueous formaldehyde react with the sulfur dioxide in the col-
lecting solution. The sulfamic acid prevents interference from nitrogen dioxide.
Nitrogen dioxide measurements are based on the procedures of Jacobs-
Hochheiser and Saltzman. When the sample air containing nitrogen dioxide is
drawn through a sodium hydroxide solution, a dilute solution of sodium nitrite and
sodium nitrate is produced. In the laboratory, this collecting solution is reacted
with solutions containing phosphoric acid, sulfanilamide, and N-(l-naphtyl)-
ethylene-diamine dihydrochloride. The transmittance of the resulting azo dye is
measured colorimetrically.
The analytical method for aldehydes is based on the fact that MBTH (3-
methyl-2-benzothiazolone hydrozone hydrochloride) reacts with aliphatic alde-
hydes in the presence of acid ferric chloride. Aldehydes are collected by drawing
air through a 0. 05 percent solution of MBTH contained in a special polypropylene
collection tube. The special tube is required because both the MBTH and the
aldehydes are unstable when allowed to come in contact with rubber, polyethylene,
or Tygon, materials that are otherwise used in the gas sampler. The sampling
tubes contain 50 ml of distilled water when sent into the field. After the sample is
returned to the laboratory, color is developed by the addition of ferric chloride-
sulfamic acid solution, and measured colorimetrically. Results are expressed as
formaldehyde.
SOILING INDEX
Soiling index values are determined with a standard spot tape sampler
operating on a 2-hour cycle. The soiled tapes are read with an automated trans-
missivity meter that determines the soiling index values. Because the trans-
mittance of light through the soiled spot is affected primarily by the surface area
of the particles collected, soiling index values are a reflection primarily of the
smaller particles. When values of more than 6. 0 are reported, the soiled spot is
so dense that an accurate determination is not possible. Such values are under-
estimated, that is, they are lower than would be the average of two 1-hour deter-
minations.
20
-------
SECTION 2.
URBAN AND NONURBAN
SUSPENDED P ARTICULATE MATTER
-------
Table 2-1. SUSPENDED PARTICIPATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
ALABAMA
HUNTSVILLE
SITE 01
MONTGOMERY
SITE 01
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 03
FAIRBANKS
SITE 01
ARIZONA
MARICOPA COUNTY
SITE 01
PHOENIX
SITE 02
TUCSON
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
UTTLE ROCK
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BAKERSFIELO
SITE 01
BERKELEY
SITE 01
S^TE*Lil
LCNG BEACH
SITE 01
LOS ANGELES
SITE 01
MONTEREY
SITE 01
OAKLAND
SITE 01
REDOING
SITE 01
SALINAS,.
SITE 01
•SAN DIEGO
SITE 01
SAN FRANCISCO
SITE 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
SANTA CRUZ
SITE 01
COLORAD'O
ADAMS COUNTY
SITE 01
ARVADA
SITE 01
AURORA
SITE 01
BOULDER,
SITE 01
SITE 02
SUMMARY
BROOMFIELC
SITE 01
Yew
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
*. 67
* 67
67
67
67
* 67
67
# 67
* 67
67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
No. ot
samples
26
26
24
23
26
26
24
25
28
23
26
25
25
26
25
20
40
24
25
26
25
110
104
112
90
94
184
91
Concentration. jjg/n>3
Mln
22
26
16
26
8
60
36
36
51
21
22
26
26
23
33
24
23
30
17
29
16
18
30
19
11
15
11
'
Frequency distribution - eercentlle
10
34
41
22
31
24
85
54
54
73
25
30
62
50
26
44
37
39
39
39
33
26
36
55
40
28
27
27
16
20
46
57
28
35
40
104
60
58
76
27
36
91
64
35
49
41
44
44
45
I *8
31
46
65
50
34
31
31
21
30
49
59
43
53
42
109
63
62
90
36
54
104
82
41
67
58
60
50
49
54
42
55
74
57
39
35
36
24
40
56
63
55
HI
50
133
80
67
130
57
73
112
86
47
79
62
73
56
59
59
45
68
85
63
41
37
40
30
50
66
68
60
131
53
162
91
71
146
63
84
115
93
53
96
70
77
64
67
64
66
77
97
69
47
44
45
35
60
71
78
84
153
60
188
100
82
168
70
92
123
98
61
102
82
94
72
70
86
66
88
105
75
52
50
51
70
81
93
101
281
74
215
118
107
183
77
118
154
118
74
122
99
107
82
94
88
83
97
115
79
58
57
57
49
80
93
96
153
330
103
230
136
118
203
81
126
177
125
83
139
104
122
88
105
101
91
121
134
92
65
67
66
64
90
100
106
312
418
125
247
160
131
234
105
155
209
158
91
149
135
171
103
122
128
101
148
'56
109
75
79
79
•7
Max
127
137
320
767
187
374
175
141
908
223
253
287
292
152
171
413
245
126
171
142
164
196
214
308
176
100
176
109
Arilh
mean
67
75
99
201
68
169
97
84
170
68
90
132
103
60
96
93
95
68
75
75
65
85
100
75
51
48
49
42
Geo
•nean
62
70
69
124
57
154
89
79
140
56
75
118
91
54
87
76
81
64
66
68
57
74
92
68
47
44
45
35
Std
1.57
1.47
2.36
2.84
1.92
1.56
1.56
1.46
1.78
1.86
1.90
1.68
1.68
1.63
1.62
1.83
1.78
1.47
1.69
1.58
1.75
1.71
1.52
1.52
1.56
1.52
1.S4
1.84
•Data contributed by sal* or local igney.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICIPATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
COLORADO SPRINGS
SITE os
DENVER
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
SITE o*
SITE OJ
SITE 06
SITE 07
SUMMARY
DURANGC
SITE 03
ENGLEWOOD
SITE 01
FORT COLLINS
SITE 01
SlENwOOB SPRINGS
SITE 01
GOLDEN
SITE 01
GRAND JUNCTION
SITE 03
6REELEY
SITE 01
SITE 02
SUMMARY
LAKEkOOD
SITE 01
LONGMtW
SITE 01
MANITOU SPRINGS
SITE 01
MONTROSE
SITE 01
PUEBLO
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
SITE o»
SITf 05
SITE 06
SUMMARY
STERLING
SITE 01
TRINIDAD
SITE 01
CONNECTICUT
BRIDGEPORT
SITE 01
HARTFORD
SITE 01
NEW BRITAIN
SITE 02
Veer
*6T
*67
67
*67
*67
* 67
* 67
* 67
*67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 6T
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
# 67
67
* 67
No. ol
samples
112
137
1U
109
119
10$
108
113
805
112
111
86
99
106
«Z
115
111
233
117
93
108
106
107
107
105
109
113
112
693
92
117
2*
26
23
Concentration, Jig/m3
Mln
20
29
33
39
39
26
20
19
19
2*
35
22
26
21
20
22
16
16
14
20
20
25
25
30
54
16
20
19
16
26
18
44
23
31
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
41
94
TO
61
54
42
29
37
45
43
52
30
40
37
28
37
29
32
28
»9
42
48
68
50
71
31
43
92
46
45
43
64
38
66
20
50
61
89
76
70
53
40
44
55
49
57
43
49
43
42
44
38
41
37
46
46
57
85
61
89
40
$6
6!
to
54
55
67
45
81
30
62
Tl
100
88
86
99
4B
51
64
96
67
48
54
50
49
55
48
SI
41
60
53
65
99
70
105
46
62
73
TO
61
49
74
49
95
40
67
81
122
99
99
68
52
55
75
61
76
60
61
57
58
66
58
62
47
68
60
78
110
79
112
S4
69
80
80
6T
78
84
55
101
50
73
88
142
112
112
73
it
58
86
69
82
70
73
62
65
80
65
70
53
T9
65
87
122
89
134
6.0
77
89
91
77
92
88
72
116
60
79
97
164
129
135
82
63
64
100
74
93
83
78
69
73
89
72
81
57
86
71
99
139
100
153
68
65
103
104
89
102
111
85
130
70
92
116
187
142
147
100
74
72
122
87
109
94
93
75
86
102
83
90
63
103
78
119
150
111
160
77
9«
114
119
102
113
115
123
138
80
107
149
255
162
175
120
82
81
151
104
124
107
116
83
100
120
92
107
75
126
84
131
169
129
179
85
107
126
140
118
134
137
140
170
90
129
190
350
196
222
151
123
100
191
117
160
124
174
97
129
149
116
135
90
156
94
150
214
165
220
110
125
140
169
150
154
148
156
193
Max
208
283
719
360
291
250
204
171
719
250
237
203
263
212
230
191
185
191
151
292
154
459
470
250
364
210
632
250
632
258
247
275
221
277
Arlllt
mean
80
105
175
121
126
86
66
64
106
77
94
75
85
66
73
85
69
77
56
92
67
96
133
99
142
66
89
97
104
89
96
105
89
125
Oeo
•nean
72
94
146
111
112
77
59
59
89
70
86
67
74
61
64
74
61
67
51
78
63
85
120
90
130
59
77
89
91
79
85
96
76
113
Sid
000
dev
1.59
1.61
1.82
1.53
1.69
1.61
1.63
1.47
1.62
1.53
1.54
1.67
1.65
1.51
i.n
1.68
1.69
1.69
».57
1.74
1.42
1.61
1.59
i.56
1.51
».S9
1.63
1.52
1.57
1.61
1.67
1.54
1.79
1.61
•Dm contributed by Kate 01 lacal afeacr.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICIPATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
Nt» HAVEN
SITE 01
STAMFORD
SITE 01
«ATERBURY
SITE 01
DELAWARE
NEWARK
SITE 01
*iwir
WASHINGTON
SITE "1
SITE oz
FLORIDA
ABALACHICOLA
SITE 01
GAINESVILLE
SITE 01
JACKSONVILLE
SITE 03
MIAMI
SITE 03
ORLANDO
SITE 01
TALLAHASSEE
SITE 01
H INTER HAVEN
SITE 01
GEORGIA
ALBANY
SITE 01
ATLANTA
SITE 01
AU6USTA
SITE 01
BRUNSWICK
SITE 01
COLUMBUS
SITE 01
GAINESVILLE
SITE 01
LYONS
SITE 01
MACON
SITE 01
ROME
SITE 01
ROSSVILLE
SITE 01
SAVANNAH
SITE 01
VALDOSTA
SITE 01
HAWAII
HONOLULU
SITE 01
Year
67
* 6?
* 67
67
67
67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
67
No. o(
samples
26
24
24
26
21
26
190
23
20
24
25
26
22
21
21
26
26
25
26
25
26
24
26
24
26
26
26
Concentration. pg/m3
Mln
31
40
2!
20
76
35
46
26
20
29
23
17
U
23
48
48
33
28
9
31
12
46
22
48
54
90
22
Frequency distribution • percentile
10
>8
42
43
35
87
5«
64
39
45
40
31
26
30
30
54
64
53
36
40
37
30
74
34
71
61
57
25
20
48
45
46
41
91
60
77
44
56
42
32
34
32
32
62
75
68
37
45
42
37
79
40
74
64
71
28
30
61
55
54
46
104
67
92
44
60
59
42
35
37
33
69
80
72
45
58
53
40
89
48
92
74
90
31
40
79
85
73
60
108
74
99
46
62
63
43
38
42
46
90
88
76
51
63
61
4!
9»
64
100
83
96
34
50
87
90
77
65
132
84
110
S4
72
65
47
43
43
55
108
96
77
64
67
67
49
127
65
111
104
97
36
60
105
99
86
71
140
94
124
68
76
77
52
51
51
55
121
99
65
68
74
69
62
146
70
125
112
112
39
70
128
110
127
77
143
99
137
76
65
85
63
62
58
59
137
104
105
81
75
89
69
148
77
156
132
117
42
80
139
116
159
90
162
127
157
79
95
101
66
64
63
68
182
140
112
110
82
95
75
204
90
208
158
139
46
90
159
147
192
134
204
150
177
107
100
132
126
92
87
68
197
179
174
157
103
129
88
214
107
254
361
14«
53
Max
177
271
237
179
223
170
304
141
108
144
167
105
137
84
307
376
257
183
122
136
124
313
113
531
802
408
83
Anth
mean
94
94
99
73
134
91
118
63
74
75
59
52
52
50
119
117
96
75
67
74
57
137
66
148
154
113
38
Geo
•nean
83
83
83
64
127
85
110
58
70
69
52
47
47
47
104
103
87
65
61
67
51
123
61
125
115
102
36
Std
seo
dev'
1.73
1.66
1.84
1.67
l.»9
1.46
1.46
1.50
1.39
1.55
1.63
1.58
1.58
1.46
1.70
1.60
1.56
1.70
1.65
1.55
1.67
1.61
1.55
1.75
1.97
1.54
1.36
•DM conMbuud by Mtt or local igmcy.
-------
Table M (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
IDAHO
BOISE
SITE 01
ILLINOIS
BLUE ISLAND
SITE 01
CALUMET CtTY
SITE 01
CHICAGO
SITE 01
SITE 02
SUMMARY
CHICAGO^EIGHTS
CICERO
SITE 01
COOK COUNTY
SITE 01
EAST ST LOUIS
SITE 01
FLOSSMOOR
SITE 01
FRANKLIN PARK
SITE 01
HARVEY
SITE 01
HILLSIDE
SITE 01
MIDLOTHIAN
SITE 01
NILES
SITE 01
ORLAND PARK
SITE 01
PALATINE
SITE 01
RIVER FOREST
SITE 01
ROCKFORD
SITE 01
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
fclLMETTE
SITE 01
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
SITE 01
HAMMOND
SITE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
MUNCIE
SITE 01
SCUTH BEND
SITE 01
TERRE HAUTE
SITE 01
Year
67
* 67
* 67
67
67
67
# 67
* 67
* 67
67
67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. ot
samples
25
132
136
26
136
162
127
1»7
136
23
136
»9
127
139
132
1ST
130
137
130
26
23
134
26
23
23
22
24
24
Concentration. ug/ii)3
Mm
13
14
21
29
73
29
la
43
20
62
18
14
19
11
14
6
20
10
28
34
2
5
82
40
71
90
37
32
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
36
61
47
54
111
84
38
71
61
106
36
37
48
38
47
27
40
2«
48
41
34
24
103
55
89
65
43
71
20
46
81
61
67
124
112
50
91
77
110
49
48
62
51
60
40
51
30
57
48
64
36
124
72
95
7$
61
80
30
58
92
68
78
144
124
58
111
95
134
58
61
72
69
74
51
62
35
77
51
70
55
140
83
110
76
63
88
40
61
104
86
82
155
144
72
132
111
140
70
84
88
79
79
61
72
43
88
64
78
65
167
92
126
82
66
96
SO
75
121
101
99
171
199
83
1S7
122
156
83
100
105
89
97
76
86
M
107
67
85
75
168
105
132
91
78
97
60
80
141
112
110
190
177
104
182
163
165
102
124
121
109
119
90
101
68
117
89
91
95
173
116
134
99
91
108
70
91
169
147
118
216
199
117
207
199
179
116
193
143
127
139
102
117
85
140
93
95
108
175
176
141
102
101
110
80
99
207
167
127
241
229
141
229
226
197
136
189
160
166
lil
128
143
106
172
101
99
133
206
182
194
106
120
134
90
113
260
213
144
281
279
191
272
306
232
193
258
196
201
223
163
173
150
19T
104
118
201
228
224
162
116
150
161
Max
121
502
397
179
423
423
366
529
576
249
360
360
432
319
427
308
411
408
559
153
335
336
276
235
241
137
189
296
Arlth
mean
72
145
120
99
187
143
101
167
Ul
156
101
123
121
111
119
89
102
72
119
74
90
97
168
124
132
91
90
113
Qeo
•nean
69
124
100
92
173
126
84
1*7
133
148
84
96
101
90
97
71
86
56
102
69
68
72
162
110
127
88
82
102
Std
&
1.69
1.79
1.83
1.53
1.48
1.51
1.85
1.68
I.8T
1.40
1.89
2.07
1.82
1.96
1.81
t.OO
1.77
'.03
1.77
1.48
2.63
2.30
1.34
1.66
1.32
1.29
1.55
1.96
26
•Data contributed by Hate of local igmcy.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
I OH A
CEDAR RAPIDS
SITE 01
OES MOINES
SITE 01
OLBUQUE
SITE 01
KANSAS
TCPEKA
SITE 01
UCHITA
SITE 01
KENTUCKY
CCVINSTON
SITE 01
LEXINGTON
5ITF 01
LCUISVILLE
SITE 01
LOUISIANA
NEK ORLEANS
SITE 02
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE
SITE 01
MASSACHUSETTS
BCSTO«I
SITE 01
BOSTON
SITE 01
BROCKTON
SITE 02
LAURENCE
SITE 01
LYNN
SITE 01
N^BED^RD
CUNCY
SITE 01
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
SITE 01
FLINT
SITE 01
GRAND RAPIDS
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
SITE 01
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
ST. LOUIS
SITE 01
SITE 02
SUMMARY
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
* 66
# 67
* 67
* 67
* 66
* 67
* 66
* 67
67
67
67
6T
67
67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
25
25
25
26
25
25
26
26
26
25
261
24
22
26
263
25
264
24
23
25
25
26
26
26
25
146
171
Concentration. jig/m3
Mln
44
60
64
15
26
35
34
53
47
49
15
32
31
15
13
26
12
24
44
15
22
35
40
60
66
17
17
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
51
64
78
20
32
5R
37
76
57
61
63
58
40
28
35
36
39
42
54
44
46
51
42
72
80
67
69
20
64
76
93
32
49
58
52
88
68
69
70
69
45
34
46
38
45
54
75
47
SO
64
51
85
84
83
84
30
106
87
101
34
62
71
63
95
71
85
80
81
49
42
52
51
52
75
93
59
69
67
57
95
91
95
95
40
110
95
110
43
76
73
69
109
75
101
91
83
52
54
61
55
57
85
130
60
72
79
66
111
104
110
110
SO
149
103
121
53
79
77
70
122
78
113
99
86
56
60
70
59
61
91
138
64
75
81
81
116
115
122
122
80
151
114
132
6C
80
79
79
136
86
130
108
102
60
66
78
64
69
112
145
70
88
91
98
123
124
140
132
70
159
124
161
63
97
82
84
140
90
153
120
112
61
80
88
69
80
160
165
83
92
95
122
150
130
165
161
80
192
148
169
73
121
83
87
160
94
187
136
137
71
90
105
78
91
218
210
93
103
106
132
155
134
187
180
90
228
173
234
89
167
111
108
174
104
225
155
143
83
115
131
102
112
253
245
103
139
121
152
182
ISO
205
203
Max
281
258
255
134
203
131
131
237
116
285
326
279
114
207
309
126
210
272
253
137
225
132
26T
209
184
296
296
Aritli
mean
138
117
136
55
89
77
74
125
81
132
106
101
59
68
79
63
70
123
141
71
84
84
94
122
115
133
124
Geo
•nean
123
108
127
48
77
74
70
117
79
117
98
92
56
58
69
58
64
100
124
66
75
79
83
116
111
121
116
sw
1.67
1.47
1.46
1.73
I.T4
1.34
1.42
1.46
1.25
1.66
1.48
1.56
1.37
1.79
1.67
1.46
1.54
1.99
1.70
1.55
1.63
1.40
1.67
1.39
1.30
1.59
1.46
•Data contributed by state orlocal agency.
27
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
MONTANA
HELENA
SITE 01
NEBRASKA
QCAHA
SITE 01
NEVADA
LAS VEGAS
SITE 01
RENO
SITE 01
NEfe HAMPSHIRE
CONCORD
SITE 01
NEh JERSEY
BAYONNE
SITE 01
BURLINGTON COUNTY
SITE 02
SLASSBORO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
PA1ERSON
SITE 01
PERTH AMBOY
SITE 01
NEVi MEXICO
ALBUOUEROUE
SITE 01
NEVi YORK
AKRON
SITE 01
.ALBANY
SITE 01
BABYLON
SITE 01
BINSHAMTON
SITE 03
BUFFALO
SITE 01
SITE 03
SUMMARY
CHEEKTOWASA NW
SITE 01
CKEMUNG COUNTY
SITE 02
COLUMBIA COUNTY
SITE 01
ELMJRA
SITE 01
ENDICOTT
SITE 01
SITE 02
ERIE^TY
Yen
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
# 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
No. of
samples
26
26
26
25
26
23
26
26
25
25
25
25
26
33
44
50
48
*B
73
52
125
49
37
50
42
52
51
48
Concentration. jig/m3
Mln
23
31
33
34
17
46
33
17
44
24
35
*3
35
12
25
30
27
26
37
21
21
35
19
12
27
13
28
3
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
33
78
57
57
19
65
49
31
64
38
45
77
52
42
50
52
4o
38
60
114
69
70
26
16
40
31
51
23
20
41
»5
65
69
24
77
63
38
73
59
51
78
63
48
53
61
56
46
72
157
79
86
33
28
56
38
78
29
30
44
101
82
83
25
88
66
40
81
67
75
96
69
56
66
65
60
58
79
166
99
93
42
32
61
42
86
34
40
54
107
85
101
29
99
75
48
86
80
81
103
86
61
75
72
68
65
92
186
110
106
45
37
64
51
109
40
SO
64
118
81
110
38
108
83
49
103
92
92
116
102
67
79
77
70
74
102
194
135
119
55
43
66
59
119
50
60
76
134
96
127
41
113
88
55
117
107
9«
120
119
71
107
81
81
80
no
222
163
123
59
49
76
68
141
57
70
86
146
111
163
83
126
103
59
131
126
107
125
129
92
114
91
93
89
127
257
194
137
64
57
86
el
151
68
80
93
154
114
204
95
145
111
61
146
137
115
134
160
114
1Z7
99
115
105
148
299
211
172
78
62
91
95
174
86
90
113
177
129
263
101
178
167
67
191
160
125
179
242
138
154
114
1*7
130
204
399
275
246
92
79
106
120
220
103
Max
182
229
133
504
129
265
184
94
229
191
157
189
282
305
220
214
263
177
277
533
533
481
150
121
171
184
636
137
Arllh
mean
71
123
91
144
33
116
93
30
115
98
89
116
120
84
96
83
86
79
114
226
170
138
37
47
75
69
140
57
Boo
Dean
63
116
87
lie
43
106
85
48
106
86
83
112
104
71
86
78
77
72
103
200
143
122
51
41
69
'9
117
48
Sid
jeo
dev
I.o3
1.48
1.39
1.88
1.96
1.53
1.54
1.41
1.51
1.72
1.48
1.35
'.74
1.81
1.65
l.»»
1.62
1.57
1.57
1.71
1.64
1.63
1.62
1.72
1.48
».77
'.81
1.87
•Data contributed by tut* or loci I agency.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
GARDEN CITY
SITE 01
WHf
HEMPSTEAD
SITE Ol
HORSEHEAOs
SITE 01
HUDSON
SITE 01
JOHNSON CITY
SITE 01
KINGS POINT
SITE 01
KINGSTON
SITE 01
LACAWANNA
SITE 01
SITE 02
SUMMARY
HI VERNON
SITE 01
NASSAU COUNTY
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
SITE 04
SUMMARY
NEW ROCHELLE
SITE 02
NEW YORK CITY
SITE 01
OSSINING
SITE 01
POUGHKEEPSIE
SITE 01
ROCHESTER
SITE 01
ROCKLAND COUNTY
SITE 01
ROCKVIU.E CTR
SITE 01
SAUGERTIES
SITE 01
SCHENECTADY
SITE 01
5CHENECTAOY COUNTY
SITE 11
SLOAN
SITE 01
Year
* 67
* 67
* 67
# 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
No. of
samples
44
49
47
40
51
51
53
48
47
50
97
47
55
54
55
59
223
48
21
50
44
52
44
Jo
48
48
45
47
Concentration, ug/m3
Mln
35
39
45
20
28
20
30
19
38
28
28
37
17
36
24
16
16
30
54
21
14
36
23
16
40
37
17
51
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
42
64
59
51
37
35
45
39
99
67
73
50
40
44
39
36
40
56
79
37
27
65
28
58
56
44
26
69
20
51
77
67
55
61
49
51
45
121
87
104
54
50
53
45
45
50
63
95
46
32
75
37
86
66
59
29
80
30
59
90
74
62
67
59
63
49
152
105
117
62
64
62
56
57
60
75
128
53
46
81
50
88
86
69
36
93
40
61
97
88
69
77
71
71
65
165
115
138
69
75
69
61
64
65
85
153
63
so
87
53
94
95
80
43
100
SO
68
110
96
74
84
95
77
69
182
127
152
77
84
83
65
69
74
93
174
75
63
97
60
102
106
88
53
116
60
72
136
117
80
89
102
90
82
226
141
170
100
88
96
75
78
85
103
205
84
71
tie
67
117
119
102
56
137
70
77
145
122
87
121
107
113
95
267
157
199
112
96
105
83
95
95
120
260
100
90
126
77
124
133
106
62
149
ao
85
156
149
124
143
121
138
113
292
183
263
131
110
133
90
105
108
136
271
112
106
146
97
131
162
112
65
170
90
106
189
194
142
163
166
181
126
399
215
293
154
135
217
110
116
135
152
301
132
131
185
129
169
176
132
85
256
Max
182
221
557
424
238
307
243
256
1093
315
1083
169
248
338
213
174
338
206
372
200
240
236
172
235
205
210
117
476
Arittl
mean
74
120
119
94
98
95
95
83
233
140
186
91
86
103
73
77
84
100
186
81
75
112
TO
111
112
92
53
140
Qeo
•wan
69
112
104
81
86
81
84
72
189
127
155
83
76
87
67
69
74
93
163
72
62
104
62
101
103
84
48
122
Std
dev
1.45
1.49
1.63
1.67
1.71
1.80
1.66
1.69
1.92
1.60
1.76
1.54
1.66
1.75
1.54
1.63
1.64
1.50
1.74
1.64
1.88
1.51
1.68
1. 59
1.54
1.53
1.58
1.64
•Ditt contributed by state or local agency.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PART1CULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
SOUTHAMPTON
SITE 01
SUFFOLK COUNTY
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 11
SITE 22
SITE 31
SUMMARY
SIlTEUS6l
TCNAMANDA
SITE 01
SITE 02
UTICA
SITE 01
IdESTCHESTER COUNTY
SITE 01
WHITE PLAINS
SITE 01
YONKERS
SITE 02
NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE
SITE 0»
NORTH DAKOTA
BISMARCK
SITE 01
FARGO
SITE 01
OHIO
ADAMS COUNTY
SITE 01
AKRON
SITE 01
CANTON
SITE 01
CINCINNATI
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
SUMMARY
CLEVELAND
SITE 01
COLUMBUS
SITE 01
DAYTON „,
SITE 01
EAST LIVERPOOL
SITE 01
FRANKLIN
SITE 01
•5ET?"ttB
HAMILTON
SITE 01
Year
* 67
* 67
* 67
*. 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
# 67
* 67
* 67
67
67
67
* 67
67
* 67
67
* 67
67
67
67
67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
No. 01
samples
48
48
49
47
48
49
241
52
35
43
50
54
58
45
25
25
24
25
26
23
25
24
146
195
26
26
26
22
25
26
25
Concentration. pg/m3
Mln
12
23
16
23
18
10
10
53
51
26
38
23
28
27
61
24
24
27
35
45
56
34
22
22
42
13
36
61
24
32
35
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
21
30
30
29
35
17
26
68
72
45
48
34
46
44
67
29
31
30
42
65
68
39
71
64
SS
57
41
84
3*
3D
42
20
25
39
35
41
45
21
31
104
78
47
39
41
53
54
82
33
37
36
77
69
73
49
82
76
64
67
77
96
46
50
51
30
29
46
40
45
48
24
39
115
87
50
78
50
63
66
86
43
41
37
9*
80
77
63
93
88
73
73
80
103
63
56
71
40
30
54
50
49
53
27
49
139
93
54
86
55
72
73
100
50
49
40
106
84
98
66
107
98
86
84
89
139
69
64
78
SO
32
59
57
53
57
29
51
157
103
58
102
58
78
95
107
61
54
63
134
88
120
76
114
111
91
86
97
159
73
74
94
60
33
69
61
57
69
31
57
184
132
63
116
70
89
98
109
65
65
65
139
98
126
88
126
123
111
99
127
177
89
80
100
70
35
77
70
66
74
36
67
237
138
69
133
79
107
122
125
111
71
72
156
126
146
89
139
135
131
102
171
181
101
93
115
BO
43
92
81
70
84
42
77
277
153
77
142
93
122
147
128
117
84
79
174
139
160
111
154
152
143
110
its
198
125
10,
123
90
47
128
119
83
94
50
93
335
184
84
161
115
141
ITS
173
146
95
92
195
143
184
136
189
175
146
121
249
255
142
120
148
Max
94
250
209
136
166
87
250
442
302
143
231
143
264
282
316
216
136
103
228
1,3
225
151
301
301
189
168
293
306
182
193
214
Arlth
mean
35
70
64
58
64
32
57
184
120
63
10,
68
89
103
115
80
63
59
127
102
119
81
123
107
102
89
129
160
86
79
96
Qeo
•nean
32
61
55
54
59
29
50
159
111
60
98
61
80
90
108
66
57
54
114
95
111
74
114
98
95
82
110
146
76
72
86
Sid
geo
lev'
1.46
1.67
1.68
1.47
1.51
1.54
1.58
1.76
1.48
1.37
1.60
1.60
1.37
1.70
1.43
1.88
1.58
1.33
1.67
1.46
1.49
».!*
1.48
1.30
1.50
1.62
1.80
1.55
1.70
1.55
1.60
•Data contributed by salt or local agency.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LCRAIN
SITE 01
MARYSVtLLE
SITE 01
NAPOLEON
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
PAtNESVILLE
SITE 01
PORTSMOUTH
SITE 5i
STEUBEMVILLE
SITE 01
TCLEOO ,
SITE 01
UPPER SANOUSKY
SITE 01
VAN WEST
SITE 01
WARREN
SITE 01
WASHINGTON COURT HOUSE
SITE 01
MCOSTER
SITE 01
YOUNGSTOfcN
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA CITY
SITE 01
TULSA
SITE 01
OREGON
EUGENE
SITE 01
MEDFORD
SITE 01
PORTLAND
SITE 01
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLENTOMN
SITE 01
ALTOONA
SITE 01
BETHLEHEM
SITE 01
SITE 01
LANCASTER
SITE 01
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 02
SUMMARY
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
"l?TEN6Ol
Year
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
iff 67
67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. 01
samples
26
26
24
25
22
23
26
26
21
24
22
21
26
26
26
25
24
26
26
25
25
25
26
24
26
152
178
25
25
Concentration. pg/m3
Mln
26
31
35
41
51
44
28
20
35
29
38
43
24
48
34
22
22
26
15
28
48
41
47
61
68
39
39
68
13
Frequency distribution • percent! le
10
35
51
37
37
56
50
81
43
40
48
47
72
42
63
48
24
45
33
42
59
67
70
52
71
96
81
81
80
36
20
37
75
46
82
59
69
131
54
48
52
61
97
53
89
58 .
32
48
49
49
75
73
85
61
77
102
97
98
89
53
30
43
82
59
96
68
76
144
58
50
59
78
104
55
94
63
38
58
65
60
84
82
90
77
98
110
111
111
98
58
40
32
98
65
101
69
9*
171
73
53
59
106
110
68
104
67
41
62
94
72
87
88
101
86
101
120
128
128
108
65
SO
55
105
69
116
85
107
248
79
58
65
136
117
73
111
70
47
76
100
73
103
100
114
89
107
134
141
141
133
96
60
60
109
79
131
97
110
304
83
61
70
142
122
85
125
85
52
82
104
86
110
103
136
105
112
142
157
1ST
161
111
70
86
119
92
134
102
127
379
104
69
79
176
128
102
153
99
58
87
116
108
117
122
144
118
115
213
179
182
180
125
60
93
132
100
142
107
162
490
121
82
129
189
152
108
175
105
75
135
154
118
144
149
170
125
152
240
207
211
195
136
90
120
146
108
184
116
261
593
130
103
142
223
182
152
225
146
80
151
198
149
200
158
240
139
156
287
258
263
229
188
Max
252
207
1,1
305
186
29!
936
155
404
1 82
239
262
261
235
310
111
211
247
220
311
204
354
193
301
362
495
495
259
348
Arlth
mean
74
102
78
123
88
121
299
83
79
81
129
125
91
127
92
53
84
104
87
114
108
137
98
118
167
158
162
145
109
Geo
•nean
62
95
72
112
83
106
227
75
65
72
111
117
78
117
81
48
73
87
76
100
102
122
91
110
ISO
143
146
134
87
Std
geo
dev-
1.76
1.52
1.54
1.56
1.39
1.70
2.23
1.63
1.70
1.60
1.81
1.48
1.73
1.34
1.63
1.57
1.72
1.87
1.77
1.68
1.42
1.62
1.45
1.43
1.58
1.56
1.37
1.51
Z.02
••Dm contributed by stall or leal »ge»cr.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
SCRANTCN
SITE 01
KARMINSTER
SITE 01
WEST CHESTER
SITE 01
YORK
SITE 01
PUERTO nice
BAYAMQN
SITE 01
SUAYAN^A
PONCE
SITE 01
RHODE ISLAND
EAST PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
PRO^EgCE
SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA
SITE "I
ROCK HILL
SITE 02
TFNNESSEE
CHATTANOOGA
SITE 01
•W-K
MEMPHIS
SITE 01
NASHVILLE
SITE 01
TEXAS
AUSTIN
SITE 01
8AYTOWN
SITE 01
SITE 02
CLUTE CITY
SITE Ol
CORPUS CHRISTI
SITE 01
SITE 02
SUMMARY
EL PASO
SITE 01
FT WORTH
SITE 01
GALVESTON
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
i AREDO
SITE 01
LUBBOCK
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
* 67
67
67
67
67
* 67
*67
* 67
*67
*67
*67
* 67
* 67
* 67
* 67
67
* 67
*67
No. ol
samples
23
23
26
26
25
23
24
26
23
26
26
22
24
26
2*
24
31
29
26
26
26
52
24
24
26
26
24
26
Concentration, jjg/m3
Mln
61
30
19
35
51
9
32
17
39
30
10
61
32
26
37
42
10
20
15
27
20
20
60
47
25
31
43
29
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
89
40
37
55
n
29
84
33
73
51
18
72
63
53
63
62
20
23
35
43
31
41
84
63
33
61
66
36
20
102
65
46
59
64
29
110
42
77
58
35
93
65
68
65
66
26
47
46
54
46
51
94
70
35
75
77
60
30
130
75
48
64
72
30
126
43
81
64
49
114
77
78
70
78
30
55
53
$9
52
56
109
75
39
88
107
66
40
150
96
53
71
77
35
153
45
90
71
61
130
85
96
82
87
31
58
67
63
60
61
116
79
46
102
114
84
SO
178
103
54
83
109
36
162
50
91
72
65
134
89
99
101
9*
32
62
70
67
65
66
136
84
47
111
123
103
60
225
109
65
101
128
40
194
69
105
86
63
154
9*
103
110
97
40
72
81
75
74
75
1*7
86
50
120
132
113
70
313
116
76
131
165
42
218
76
116
90
96
162
US
117
126
125
41
78
90
8*
81
81
164
88
61
130
147
162
80
318
121
85
145
181
48
239
80
121
93
109
214
125
117
128
ISO
46
78
96
86
87
87
227
93
66
162
19*
168
90
422
155
105
156
244
65
243
94
136
111
133
265
144
127
186
171
62
85
109
101
108
101
302
100
90
169
201
216
Max
783
187
161
204
362
78
355
144
177
169
940
293
178
142
255
180
80
110
138
133
121
133
426
lie
180
189
498
341
Arlth
mean
234
99
65
99
131
40
174
62
101
79
134
153
96
94
109
104
38
62
73
70
68
69
162
82
56
113
142
118
Goo
mean
104
90
59
90
111
37
156
56
96
75
68
139
91
88
99
97
34
58
65
67
62
45
143
80
to
105
124
98
Sid
K
1.84
1.61
1.56
1.59
1.77
1.52
1.68
1.60
1.37
1.42
2.82
1.59
1.44
1.49
1.59
1.49
1.S7
l.M
1.75
1.41
1.S4
1.48
1.63
1.23
1.53
1.54
1.68
1.89
•Data contributed by slit* of local agency.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICIPATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
MCALLEN
SITE 01
ODESSA
SITE 01
ORANGE
SITE 01
"sfTEENSl
PORT ARTHUR
SITE 01
SAN ANTONIO
SITE 01
TEXARKANA
SITE 01
TEXAS CITY
SITE 01
TYLER
SITE 01
WACO
SITE 01
WICHITA FALLS
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
VIRGINIA
HAMPTON
SITE 01
LYNCHBUgf
NORFOLK
SITE 01
PORTSMOUTH
SITE oi
RICHMOND
SITE 01
RCANOKE
SITS 01
WASHINGTON
AUBURN
SITE 01
BELLEVUE
SITE 01
EVERETT
SITE 02
RENTON
SITE 01
SEATTLE
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
SITE 03
SITE 06
SITE 07
SITE Oa
Year
* 47
* 47
* 47
* 47
* 67
47
* 47
* 47
* 47
* 47
* 47
47
47
47
47
47
47
67
* 47
* 47
* 47
* 47
47
* 47
* 47
* 47
* 67
* 47
* 47
No. ol
samples
23
27
25
24
23
23
24
24
25
26
26
25
26
26
25
26
26
25
118
116
101
121
24
110
112
112
110
116
91
Concentration. jig/m3
Mln
14
61
33
34
23
29
13
23
20
26
48
33
35
59
39
25
41
42
,
9
20
7
35
17
13
24
19
20
16
Frequency distribution • percentlle
10
61
69
43
40
23
46
29
30
42
43
53
34
45
65
46
41
55
44
It
21
35
17
39
34
38
54
29
33
25
20
74
89
54
46
38
49
36
38
46
65
69
44
48
67
56
71
71
53
20
26
'43
20
48
43
55
65
35
38
30
30
81
117
45
48
45
54
39
39
49
72
77
56
50
75
74
80
72
40
28
29
51
27
52
48
66
75
42
43
38
40
105
124
69
58
47
41
44
43
61
82
83
58
52
79
81
83
80
42
38
35
55
34
58
54
77
89
46
47
45
SO
116
129
71
61
49
90
49
46
67
85
93
71
59
94
91
85
91
71
52
40
44
47
59
58
92
103
52
51
51
60
124
158
78
45
51
96
53
49
79
93
109
73
68
117
105
88
100
80
40
46
49
56
71
69
136
123
58
59
59
70
145
178
93
67
66
99
67
53
94
101
128
88
87
133
111
97
113
85
69
53
75
47
74
78
158
132
44
43
70
80
152
264
102
73
71
115
73
55
100
111
169
102
91
141
119
103
122
98
84
63
86
75
78
84
186
147
75
T2
97
90
172
294
114
94
77
123
103
60
116
137
243
120
98
166
131
121
147
120
103
79
97
86
110
104
227
171
83
95
144
Max
272
739
152
103
149
141
135
61
341
176
439
178
116
170
160
151
189
190
164
106
193
128
146
166
388
241
200
211
247
Arith
mean
120
184
79
62
55
82
37
46
87
89
127
77
48
105
92
84
97
80
54
44
47
49
48
46
123
109
38
40
49
Geo
•nean
105
150
74
59
50
74
51
44
72
82
107
70
65
99
86
81
91
74
43
39
61
40
63
60
97
99
52
54
55
Std
9<»
dev
1.77
1.82
1.47
1.35
1.53
1.53
1.48
1.30
1.80
1.31
1.75
1.57
1.39
1.42
1.49
1.51
1.45
1.44
2.05
1.68
1.33
2.03
1.43
1.57
2.06
1.60
1.56
1.55
1.93
•DM contributed by Mil* ot leal egncy.
-------
Table 2-1 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
TACOKA A<
SITE 01
VANCOUVER
SITE 01
WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
EAU CLAIRE
SITE 01
KENOSHA
SIT! 01
MAO I SON
SITE 01
SITE 01
RACINE
SITE 01
SUPERIOR
SITE 01
WYOMING
CASPER
SITE 01
CHEYENNE
SITE 01
Year
* 67
* 67
67
* 67
67
67
67
# 67
* 67
67
67
No. ol
samples
113
118
26
24
26
26
26
25
23
26
24
Concentration. ug/m3
Mln
3
21
54
17
29
19
39
38
37
22
la
Frequency distribution - percentlla
10
29
30
35
21
41
31
47
44
so
33
21
20
35
39
75
27
49
38
84
44
62
36
21
30
42
51
86
33
50
44
103
61
66
39
24
40
48
60
107
38
55
51
118
64
79
48
25
50
96
65
133
44
58
55
139
78
84
91
30
60
65
71
205
49
75
60
152
78
87
62
31
70
80
81
241
65
87
73
173
100
96
68
33
80
92
92
282
69
aa
87
184
106
104
83
36
90
114
109
333
93
101
102
237
162
114
97
56
Max
255
184
522
104
117
109
340
177
172
125
93
Arlth
mean
67
70
182
50
68
61
142
85
84
60
34
GOO
•nean
56
62
146
44
64
35
125
76
80
53
31
Sid
K
1.83
1.61
1.98
1.70
1.43
1.36
1.71
I. 59
1.41
1.35
1.32
•Data contributed by stau or local Kancy.
-------
Table 2-2. SUSPENDED PARTICIPATE MATTER, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MCNTSO«EHY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VFR06 NAT PK
SITE 01
DELAWARE
KENT COUNTY
SITE 01
IDAHO
BUTTE COUNTY
c t Ye fll
SITE w*
INDIANA
MONROE CCUNTY
SITE 01
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
MAINE
ACADIA NAT PK
SITE 01
MARYLAND
CALVERT COUNTY
SITE 01
MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON COUNTY
SITE 01
MISSOURI
SHANNON COUNTY
SITE 01
MONTANA
GLACIER NAT PK
SITE 01
NEBRASKA
THOMAS COUNTY
SITE 01
NEVADA
WHITE PINE COUNTY
SITE 01
NEVt HAMPSHIRE
COOS COUNTY
SITE 01
NElt MEXICO
RIO ARPfBA COUNTY
SITE 01
NEW YORK
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CAPE HATTERAS
SITE 01
NORTH DAKOTA
WARD COUNTY
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
CHEROKEE COUNTY
SITE 01
OREGON
CURRY COUNTY
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
25
25
25
24
25
24
21
21
26
25
24
26
24
26
23
26
23
29
25
25
Concentration. pg/m3
Mln
3
13
22
2
21
19
IB
8
12
5
1*
9
1
8
e
7
20
6
IT
23
Frequency distribution - percentlle
to
9
16
24
8
29
30
22
12
22
20
17
0
1
10
13
9
23
13
18
25
20
11
18
26
9
33
33
27
17
27
23
18
12
3
15
I
1
' 14
13
29
14
26
27
30
14
25
29
11
36
41
34
21
30
25
22
13
4
16
14
15
35
20
31
31
40
15
27
34
13
42
44
43
22
35
29
25
17
4
19
19
21
42
25
36
42
SO
16
31
42
14
57
10
46
45
25
38
31
28
19
6
20
20
23
44
28
40
47
90
21
32
46
17
64
^3
51
*9
28
41
37
36
13
23
10
24
22
30
34
34
40
37
70
23
40
54
18
70
IB
19
54
51
33
45
42
42
20
29
11
28
29
38
67
*9
46
65
80
26
44
63
24
78
66
55
34
47
50
53
31
30
12
30
40
48
113
61
50
69
90
33
68
71
36
85
42
76
63
46
68
53
53
j2
37
13
40
56
77
121
63
74
82
Max
106
104
80
92
119
_A
TU
112
•V
103
70
65
67
70
53
47
56
144
102
164
75
118
96
Arttn
mean
22
36
45
19
57
• .
17
51
44
29
39
35
34
la
AO
22
9
24
30
33
61
34
44
51
Geo
•Man
17
31
41
15
52
47
41
25
36
32
3l
12
19
6
21
23
25
50
28
39
46
Std
oeo
dev'
2.03
1.71
1.50
2.03
1.59
2 KM
et,53
1.48
1.53
1.77
1.49
1.70
1.59
2 4&
*-.*o
1.68
2.56
1.65
1.97
2.09
1.85
1.92
1.62
l.ST
•Data contributed by state or local agency.
-------
Table 2-2 (continued). SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LOCATION
PENNSYLVANIA
CLARION CCUNTY
SITE 01
RHODE ISLAND
WASHINGTON COUNTY
SITE 01
SOITH CAROLINA
RICHLAND COUNTY
SITE 01
SOUTH DAKOTA
BLACK HILLS NAT FOR
SITE 01
TEXAS
CHAMBERS COUNTY
SITE 01
SITE 02
MATA60RDA COUNTY
SITE 01
VE9MONT
OPANGE COUNTY
SITE 01
VIRGINIA
SHENANOOAH NAT PK
SITE 01
WASHINGTON
KINS COUNTY
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
DOOR COUNTY
SITE 01
WYOMING
YELLOWSTONE PARK
SITE 01
Year
6T
67
6T
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
24
24
25
25
27
23
25
26
26
114
21
26
Win
15
19
11
a
18
i«
12
20
12
1
5
0
Concentration. ug/m3
Frequency distribution - percantile
10
23
21
15
1
22
23
l«
23
17
4
9
2
20
25
25
17
10
27
33
24
26
22
5
10
5
30
31
32
21
15
30
37
26
30
23
7
11
5
40
33
36
27
15
33
42
28
34
26
8
14
5
SO
47
36
29
23
39
43
31
35
26
13
15
6
60
54
41
31
30
42
*9
34
43
29
23
21
9
70
68
45
37
36
45
53
36
55
30
28
26
14
80
85
63
39
*9
52
66
n
61
31
33
30
20
90
117
9*
62
62
61
72
53
72
41
48
46
27
Max
129
151
287
86
78
99
67
140
57
76
62
38
Arllh
mean
56
49
41
SI
40
47
34
48
29
21
22
11
3eo
•nean
It
41
30
23
37
43
31
41
27
13
17
8
Sid
gee
dev'
1.89
1.73
1.92
2.12
l.*7
1.57
1.49
1.67
1.45
Z.70
1.98
2.48
•DM ortnVrtri by sate of local igtncy.
-------
SECTION 3.
URBAN AND NONURBAN
BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
-------
Table 3-1. BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, URBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
ALABAMA
HUNTSVILLE
SITt ni
MONTGOMERY
SITt 11
AL»SKA
ANCHORAGE
SITh "3
sm. 01
ARUQNA
I'ARICOPA COUNTY
SITE 01
PHOENIX
SITE 02
TUCSON
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK
SITE 01
CALIFOOKIA
GLEMUALE
SITE 01
LONG 8EACH
SITt 01
LOS ANGELES
SITE 01
OAKLAND
SITt 01
SAN DIEGO
SITt 01
SAN FRANC15CC
StTt 01
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE 01
CONNECTICUT
HARTFOR1
SITt 01
NEW HAVEN
StTt 01
DELAWARE
NEWARK
SITE 01
WlL«I«6TON
SITt 01
DC
WASHINGTON
SITE 01
GEORCIA
ATLANTA
sm 01
HAWAII
HONOLULU
SITE 01
IOAHO
BO ISt
SITh 01
ILLINOIS
CHICA6C
SITt 01
EAST ST LOUIS
sm 01
ROCKFORO
SITE 01
SPRIN6FIELD
SITE 01
Vnt
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ug/m3
qoat.
5.1
10.9
6.9
11.1
2.3
17.7
5.9
7.?
19. *
U.o
13.4
10.1
10.1
9.7
9.8
5.--
12.4
4.8
10.3
2.6
6. a
6.1
8.3
4.*
3.U
2nd
quit.
3.0
4.2
'.9
7.3
1.4
5.7
3.3
4.4
S.O
6.6
5,7
3.3
3.1
3.9
7.2
7.»
6.3
3.9
5.5
2.7
'.8
4.9
6.6
4.4
6.S
3rd
quir.
3.9
,,,
3. 3
13.2
1.1
>.*
2.1
l.t.
•>.•!
0.1
4.1
4. I
<.•>
6.0
j.tt
2.-
'.-
».*
» »
1.9
».»
4. A
9.0
5.3
4.4
quit.
9.1
12.8
4.8
17.3
3.5
12.2
5.1
10.1
20.0
18.9
9.9
8.9
10. 5
14.1
5.8
5.2
9.7
7.4
12.1
2.7
6.4
7.2
11.0
3.2
30
My
«vg
6.4
5.7
12.7.
e
v.»
4.1
6.9
12.5
10.9
8.3
6.6
O.b
8.5
6.2
0. (
4.0
9.0
5.4
8.4
2.9
5.7
5.7
8.9
4.3
4..
Station location
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
JND1A"ADOLIS
sm -u
Sm ni
SOUTH BEND
TF.RRE HAUTE
sm 01
IOWA
CEOAR RAPIDS
OES MO! DEI
OUBllQUE
SITE 01
KANSAS
lOPfKA
sm 01
KENTUCKY
COVTNGTON
LtXtriGIOH
LCUI5V1LLF
SlTIr 11
LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE
MICHIGAN
OF. T"0 IT
FLINT
G°A»I! RAPID;
SITE 01
•MNNF.SOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
SITt 01
ST PAUL
SITE 01
"ISSOUHI
KANSAS CITY
ST LOUIS
SITE Ot
MONTANA
HELENA
SITt 01
NEBRASKA
OXAriA
NEVADA
LAS VEGAS
SITt 01
RENO
SITt 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
quit.
8.8
4.5
7.1
6.1
3.
a, t
4.6
5.8
7.2
6.9
3.7
7.4
20.6
Conce
2nd
quit.
7.2
7.4
6.0
,_,
Z.5
(s y
4.3
5.3
4.2
4.6
2.0
3.0
4.4
amtiMi,
3rd
quit.
8.0
4.7
4.4
s>,
^
*•.'
4.4
5.7
6.9
2."
3.4
7.2
Bg/n3
4H>
qmt.
9.5
4.6
6.0
6.4
2.0
5.1
5.8
«.a
8.9
7.9
4.9
6.5
14.4
THy
8.4
5.3
5.8
2.8
6.1
4.8
5.4
o.p
6.3
3.4
11.7
-------
Table 3-1 (continued). BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, URBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
NEW HA«PSHIRF
CPNCOPC
SITt 01
NEh JEPSFY
SITt 01
SITt 02
GLASSBCaO
sm ••!
JERSEY CITY
SITf "I
SITt 01
SITt "1
PERTH A«B«Y
SITE 01
NEK ''Ex I CO
ALBlJOUEHUHE
SITt 01
NEW YORK
UE» Y1RK CITY
SITt 01
NOPT'4 CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE
StTt 01
OHIO
STTE 01
CINCI-'NATI
SITt 01
SITE 01
COLUWLS
StTt 01
SITE 01
SITt 01
SITt 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLnHO"A CITY
SITf. 01
TIILSA
SITt 11
CREGO"
tUGENE
SITt 01
SITt 01
PORTLAND
SITt 01
ALLFM!C'*N
SITfc 01
SITt 11
SITt 01
ERIE
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ug/v3
quar.
5.6
10.0
II. Z
10.0
H.I
4.9
12.8
22.6
s.u
6.D
12.5
8.8
3.2
2nd
quar.
'.0
•*•*>
4.6
11.;
6.2
1.2
4.7
5.6
D.I
5.3
,.1
0,7
».»
,.,
3rd
quar.
t ,
...
...
ll.i
6.7
>.7
4,S
V."
9.6
>.<
4.*
0.0
S.4
3.0
quar.
5.1
6.8
10.1
11.1
14.4
16.3
6.4
3.7
11. 0
33.7
10.7
4.3
23.9
3.5
6.1
»rl»
avg
4.6
6.2
..3
7.3
12.2
9.8
7.4
4.5
9.8
18.0
6.6
5.4
13.5
5.8
5.4
Station location
PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA
SITt 01
.-ITT5ML85H
site ni
READING
SITt 01
SCRANTON
SITE 01
SITE 01
WFST CHESTER
SITE 01
YnRK
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
SITt 01
6UAYA~ILLA
SITt 01
PO.NCE
SITE 01
SAN JUAN
SITE 01
RHOOF. ISLAND
EAST PROVIDF.NCt
SITt 01
pPOVIOtNCE
SITt ni
SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA
SITt 01
TENNFSSEF
CHATTAN10GA
SITt 01
KMOIVILLE
SITE 01
MEMPHIS
SITt 01
NASHVILLE
SITt 01
TEXAS
HOUSTON
SITt 01
PASADtNA
SITE 01
SAN ANTONIO
SITt ni
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITt 01
VIRGINIA
HAMPTON
SITt 01
LYNCHING
SITt 01
i.'ORFOLK
SITE 01
PORTSMOUTH
snt 01
SITt 01
RCA "OK E
SITt 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ug/m3
1st
quar.
14.0
34.4
5.4
B.B
7.8
2.9
4.2
10.3
9.0
,.7
7.»
7.0
i.'
9.9
4.5
11.1
7.?
7.6
9.'
2nd
quar.
9.4
13..
,.7
2.6
<*.;
L. '
2.1
' .H
4.3
5.6
7.*
7.8
2.3
2.7
2.0
3.6
3.8
4.5
4.8
3rd
quar.
...
V* L
ft.O
».*
4.1
2.0
6.3
0.1
'.'
10.6
6.4
3.?
4.6
f.O
6.*
4.3
,.4
,.<
4th
quit.
13.1
21.6
9.0
3.9
7.4
3.1
5.0
8.4
12.0
24.5
11.9
13.1
2.9
1.8
13.5
i
9.2
7.3
9.9
Jrly
11.1
19.7
6.U
4.4
5.9
2.4
8.2
7.8
12.4
H.3
If. 4
3.8
8
5.0
9.2
6.2
5.7
'.»
-------
Table 3-1 (continued). BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, URBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
WASHINGTON
SFA1TIE
KEST VIRGINIA
CHAPUSTOM
SITt 11
hIVONSIN
SITt 01
MADISON
Yeai
67
67
16!
quar.
4.2
4.9
Conce
2nd
quai.
4.4
3.2
itration.
3rd
quar.
*•'
3.T
ig/m3
4th
quar.
6. a
4.1
My
avg
5."
4.0
Station location
MILWAUKEE
StTt ni
KYCMTNC-
CASnf
SIT^ 01
Veai
67
67
Concentration, ug/m3
1st
quar.
6.2
1."
2nd
quar.
i.»
"°
3rd
quar.
->.'
"'
4th
quar.
5.6
2.S
avg
»•'
-------
Table 3-2. BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FROM CONTRIBUTING NETWORKS
LOCATION'
COLORADO
ADAKS COUNTY
SITE 01
ARVADA
SITE 01
ALRORA
SITE 01
BCULOE*
SITE 01
SITE 02
BROOKFIELD
SITE 01
COLORADO SPRINGS
SITE 03
DENVER
SITE 01
SITE 03
SITE 04
SITE 05
SITE 06
SITE 07
SITE 03
ENGLEWOCD
SITE 01
FCRT COLLINS
SITE 01
GLENInOOD SPRINGS
SITE 01
GCLDEN
SITE 01
GRAND JUNCTION
SITE 03
GREELEY
SITE 01
SITE 02
LAKEKOCC
SITE 01
LCNGKQHT
SITE 01
MANITOU SPRINGS
SITE 01
MCNTSOSF
SITE 01
PLEBLO
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
SITE 04
SITE 05
SITE 06
STEPLI«"5
SITE 01
TRINIDAD
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
110
104
111
89
94
90
111
106
109
119
103
107
111
110
111
86
99
106
82
114
117
116
92
107
106
107
106
104
109
112
112
92
115
Concentration. yg/m3
Mln
.8
1.5
.5
.4
.1
.8
1.0
1.8
.9
1.5
1.3
.3
.8
.9
.2
.8
1.2
1.0
l.l
1.8
.9
1.*
.8
1.2
.9
.9
.4
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
2.2
3.9
2.4
1.7
1.2
6.0
3.4
3.2
2.4
2.1
1.7
3.2
2.2
2.1
2.4
2.5
4.2
-------
Table 3-2 (continued). BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FROM CONTRIBUTING NETWORKS
LOCATION
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON
BROCKTON
SITE 02
LAWRENCE
SITE 01
NEW BEDFORD
SITE 01
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
NEU YORK
ALBANY
SITE 01
BINGHA"TON
BUFFALO
SITE 01
ELMIBA
SITE 01
NEW ROCHELLE
SITE 02
ROCHESTER
SITE 01
SCHENECTADY
TROY
SITE 02
UTICA
SITE 01
OHIO
ACAM5 COUNTY
SITE 01
CANTON
SITE 01
EAST LIVERPOOL
FRANKLIN
SITE 01
GREENVILLE
SITE 01
HAMILTON
SITE 01
LCRAIN
NARYSVlLLE
NAPOLEON
SITE 01
NEWARK
PAINESVILLE
SITE 01
PORTSMOUTH
SIT? »i
Year
47
67
47
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No, of
samples
22
26
24
24
42
72
38
46
46
50
25
23
25
22
23
Concentration, (ig/m?
Mln
3.«
2.0
2.6
2.0
».3
2 0
2.1
2.8
2.3
2,3
1 9
i.o
1 8
*.8
.5
.1
2.9
Frequency distribution - percent lie
10
3.4
3.4
3."
2.0
*.2
2.4
5.4
3.8
2«9
3.2
3,4,
.7
3,4
3.3
20
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.0
2.8
3.6
5.7
».9
«• 3
*.*
4.1
2.8
4.1
3.6
30
5.9
4.6
4.6
3.8
3.2
3.9
6.7
5.3
5.7
5.0
».z
H.4
5.3
40
«.0
5.3
5.5
*.3
3.6
*.3
'.3
5.7
4.7
5.3
*«5
5*5
6.3
50
6.7
5.9
6.0
6.3
4.0
*>.5
0.2
5.8
7.i
6.5
6.3
8.3
60
a.l
6.7
7.8
9.0
*.3
••.*
•».5
6.4
7.6
7.2
7.9
9.9
70
9.9
8.6
8.0
10.1
*.*
3.4
12.1
'.1
8.4
7.8
8.0
13.4
80
11.1
9.3
9.7
13.1
5.9
B.I
13.7
».3
9.4
14.5
8.2
8.5
14.4
90
12.4
15.3
10.0
15.5
7.8
7.1
17.4
10.3
10.9
17.2
10.4
U3
9.0
19.1
Max
22.0
24.2
16.0
17.4
12.5
16.5
24.6
16.7
12.6
20*5
18.4
14.0
24.4
Artlh
mean
7.9
I.I
6.8
7.7
4.4
5.1
10.0
6.7
7.1
10.0
6.9
6.4
•».8
Qeo
•nean
6.9
6.4
6.1
6.1
4.0
4.9
4.6
8.9
6.2
5.4
4.2
6.3
8.7
6.2
5.1
8.1
Deo
aev
1.70
1.80
1.63
2.04
1.61
1.69
1.51
1.62
l.*9
1,40
».76
1.72
1.S6
1 AR
1 65
2.66
l.«l
•Dan contrilwtad by sttte or local agency.
-------
Taole 3-2 (continued). BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FROM CONTRIBUTING NETWORKS
LOCATION
STEUBEWILLE
SITE 01
gPPEP SANDuSKY
SITE 01
VAN WF.RT
SITE 01
lnARREN
SITE Ol
WASHINGTON COURT HOUSE
SITE 01
InCOSTER
SITE 01
TEXAS
AUSTIN
SITE Ol
BAYTOWN
SITE 01
SITE 02
CLUTE CITY
SITE 01
CORPUS CHRlSTt
SITE 01
SITE 02
EL PASC
SITE 01
FT WORTH
SITE 01
GALVESW
SITE 01
LAREDO
SITE 01
LtBBCCK
SITE 01
MCALLEN
SITE 01
ODESSA
SITE 01
ORANSE
SITE 01
PCRT ARTHUR
SITE 01
TEXARKAKA
SITE 01
TEXAS CITY
SITE Ol
TYLER
SITE 01
NACO
SITE 01
N1CHITA FALLS
SITE 01
CHAMBERS COUNTY
SITE 01
SITE 02
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. Ol
samples
26
21
24
22
21
26
24
31
28
26
26
26
24
24
26
24
26
23
27
25
23
24
26
29
Z6
26
27
23
Concentration. pg/m3
Mln
3.8
1.8
1.6
3.1
2.8
2.0
2.5
I."
1.2
.9
1.1
2.1
3.0
1. 1
.8
.7
2.0
'.5
1.5
2.1
2.4
.1
.6
Frequency distribution • percentlle
10
'.8
2.1
2.6
«.0
4.1
3.2
3.2
2.1
1.7
*.6
1.4
1.5
3.2
3.0
1.8
3.4
3.1
'.6
.4
1.1
20
7.6
3.2
5.9
4.8
3.5
3.3
1.8
4.0
1.6
2.9
3.8
3.7
1.9
*.l
3.4
.»
1.5
30
8.2
4.0
7.7
5.2
3.6
3.4
1.8
4.3
1.8
4.5
-.2
*.o
*•<>
1.3
1.7
40
9.7
*.6
9.0
5.8
4.6
*.6
2.4
4.7
2.2
».7
".6
^.3
4.4
1.4
1.9
90
11.6
5.0
9.2
0.1
5.0
4.8
2.6
5.4
'.6
5.5
5.3
3.0
5.0
1.8
2.3
60
16.1
6.2
V.8
7.9
6.3
5.5
3.2
6.4
*.B
6.7
5.4
3.3
5.7
-------
Table 3-3. BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS, NONURBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
«RIZON«
GRAM) CANVOM NAT PK
SIT* 01
ARKANSAS
MONWEKY CCUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
MUKBOLDT COUNTY
SITfc 01
COLORADO
HESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
DEL.M<»RE
KENT CCUNTY
SITE 01
IDAHl
BUTTE COUNTY
SITS (11
INDIANA
KOKROt COUNTY
SITS 01
PARKE CrU'-'Tv
SITE 01
"AINE
ACADIA NATIONAL P»PK
SIT* HI
WARYLANC
CALVERT COUNTY
SITE (11
WISSISMPP1
JACKSOK COUMTY
SlTt 01
("1SSCURI
SHANNON' CPUMTY
SITE 01
*ONT ANA
OLACIER N«TIC»rtL PARK
sm 3
1»t
fltiai.
u t
.9
3.8
1.0
1.7
1.6
1.0
3.5
5.7
2.0
1.0
1.0
O
2nd
quar.
1.2
.7
l.l
.9
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.7
1.4
1.8
.7
.9
.6
3rd
quar.
2.7
l.i
4.6
1.4
2.0
1.9
3.2
2.6
2.4
1.5
1.2
1.4
.8
4th
Huai.
1.5
.9
4.1
1.5
4.0
1.5
.7
2.6
3.6
1.4
.9
1.6
.3
My
avg
l.B
.tf
2.7
1.2
l.B
1.6
1.5
2.6
3.3
1.7
i.2
1.2
.6
Station location
Nf> HA'PSHIRF
STTF: (11
NE* MEXICO
OtC A»RIB» CCUl.TY
SITt 01
J6FFEWSCH Cr-l^'tY
SITt 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CApf HAITFHAS I>*T SEA
SITE (11
OKLAHCMA
SITt (U
ORF60M
CURRY COU"TY
SITE 01
PENNSYLVANIA
CLAP I ON O\I«TY
SITt 01
RHODF ISLAND
wASHIWC-TQ" fCIIHTY
SITt 01
SOUTH CA»01 If.'A
RiCMLANn COUNTY
S1TK (11
SOUTH DAKOTA
BLACK t-TLI.S NA1 FrKFST
SITE 01
TEXAS
MATAG^RflA Cf*ONTY
SITh 01
OHAMfif COUNTY
snt 01
VIR61NIA
SITt 01
WISr-MSI"
OOOP CCUNTY
SITt 01
WYOMING
YELLOl'STO'C PAKK
SITt. nl
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
1st
quar.
1.8
1.3
1.5
3.0
2.9
4.6
2.7
• a
1.3
i.A
1.6
. 1
1.0
Conce
2nd
quar.
1.2
1.1
.7
1.8
2.0
2.6
1.4
.6
.»
4.4
1.4
1.1
.O
ilntion.
3rd
quar.
1.8
1.4
1.3
1.7
7.2
2.3
1.4
1.3
1.8
2.6
1.7
1.5
1.1
u«/«3
4th
quar.
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
.5
3.8
3.)
.9
1.2
2.2
1.6
.7
.8
YrlY
avg
1.6
1.3
1.3
2.0
>.l
3.3
2.2
.9
l.i
2.6
10
1.0
-------
Table 3-4. BENZO(a)PYRENE, URBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
ALABAMA
HUNTSVlLLE
SITE 01
PCNTGOVF.RY
STTt 01
ALASKA
AWCHOPA^E
STTt 03
FAIRBANKS
SITt 01
ARIZONA
"ARICUPA COUNTY
SITf. 01
PHOENIX
SITE 02
TUCS01
SITt 01
ARKANSAS
LtTTLf HOCK
SITt 01
CALIFORNIA
GLEwi^ALE
SITt 01
LONG BEACH
SITt 01
LOS ANCELES
SITt 01
OAKLAND
SITE 01
SAN DIEGO
SITE 01
SAN FRANCISCO
sm 01
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE 01
CONNECTICUT
HARTFPRn
SITt 01
NEh HAVFN
SITt 01
DEL-'WAog
NEWARK
SITt ill
wIL'IlGTON
SITt 01
DC
WASHINGTON
SITt 01
GEORGIA
ATLANTA
sm 01
HAWAII
HONOLULU
SITE 01
IDAHO
aoist
SITt 01
ILLINOIS
CHICAhC
SITt ni
EAST 5T LOUIS
SITt 01
HOCKFOHO
SITt 01
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ng/nfl
1st
quar.
3.11
3.68
3.04
5.72
.15
3.54
1.24
.99
1.85
3.18
2.59
2.55
2.12
2.53
3.05
3.40
3.14
2.37
5.06
2.48
4.79
.33
3.88
2.64
6.35
1.92
1.42
2nd
quar.
1.00
.87
2.42
1.82
.09
.54
.4*
.78
.52
.59
.70
.81
.53
.57
.99
2.77
2.32
.66
1.66
1.11
l.OR
.62
.82
2.08
1.65
.81
1.69
3rd
quar.
.34
.67
.57
2.54
• If-
.42
.3*
.6'
.25
.4?
.3*
.9*
.44
.40
1.00
.75
.70
.44
1.10
1.47
.60
.34
.7«
2.2B
2.10
1.45
1.1*
4th
quar.
7.90
3.90
1.62
9.82
.27
5.45
.78
2.13
1.45
3.48
1.60
2.38
3.11
2.60
4.44
1.43
1.58
1.92
3.U
2.47
5.34
.52
3.90
5.00
9.61
1.25
1.29
Yrly
avg.
3.09
2.28
1.91
4.98
.17
2.49
.70
1.13
1.02
1.92
1.31
1.69
1.55
1.53
2.37
2.09
1.94
1.35
2.73
1.83
2.95
.45
2.35
2.99
4.93
1.36
1.39
Station location
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
SITt. 01
HAMVQND
SITE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
SITt 01
MUNCIE
SITt 01
SOUTH 8FNO
SITE 01
TERRE HAUTE
SITE 01
IOWA
CEDAR R1PID5
StTt 01
DES MOINES
sm 01
OUBUQUE
SITE 01
KANSAS
TOPEKA
SITt 01
WICHITA
SITF 01
KENTUCKY
COVINC-TON
SITt 01
LEXINdtON
SITt 01
LOUISVILLE
SITt 01
LOUISIANA
NEVl ORLEANS
SITt 02
*ARYLA»'C
BALTIMORE
sm 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
STTfc 01
FLINT
SITE 01
GRAMD RAPIDS
SlTfc 01
MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
SITt 01
ST PAUL
SITt 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITt 01
ST LOUIS
SITt 01
CONTANA
HELENA
SITF 01
NEBRASKA
QWAHA
SITt 01
NEVADA
LAS VEGAS
sm 01
RENO
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ng/nv3
1st
quar.
6.04
2.50
7.99
1.82
3.49
5.41
.94
7.96
3.44
.75
.70
2.06
U89
3.61
1.85
5.02
5.58
2.1*
3.01
1.90
1.72
3.91
3.96
.75
1.23
1.50
B.77
2nd
quar.
9.04
3.93
3.02
1.59
1.59
2.72
.62
.67
1.01
.40
.53
.77
2.22
1.74
1.0ft
3.2?
2.90
1.40
2.10
.71
.96
i.lS
.72
.77
.91
.4?
1.22
3rd
quar.
4.4*
1.9?
2.93
.97
1.75
2.5?
.37
.6«
.84
.40
.3?
.71
.4*
.92
1.27
1.00
1.74
.4?
1.1?
1.31
1.04
21.0°
.84
.30
.90
.3-i
1.15
4th
quar.
3.30
1.63
8.73
1.94
3.43
4.07
1.29
1.**
2.19
.28
.*7
4.04
2.42
2.22
3.00
5.85
11.20
1.45
*.T3
1.18
5.41
2.11
3.86
1.49
2.20
1.94
(.16
Yrly
avg.
5.72
2.50
5.67
1.58
2.57
3.68
.81
2.69
1.87
.48
.51
1.90
1.75
2.12
1.80
3.77
5.36
1.37
2.75
1.28
2.28
r.07
2.35
.83
1.31
1.05
4.58
46
-------
Table 3-4 (continued). BENZO(a)PYRENE, URBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
N£W HAMPSHIRF
CONCO»0
SITt 01
NEW JEHSFY
BAYONNE
SITE 01
8URLIN6TOM CCUMY
SITt 02
6LASSHCP.O
SITt 01
J6RSEY CITY
SITt 01
NEWARK
SITt 01
PATF.RSON
SITK 01
PERTH AMBOY
SITt 01
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE
SITt 01
NEW YORK
NFH YORK CITY
SITE 01
NORTH CAPOUNA
CHARLOTTE
SITt 01
OHIO
AKRO"
SITt 01
CINCINNATI
SITt 01
^"M-EVELAND
SITE 01
CCLUMBLS
SITt 01
DAYTON
SITt 01
TflLFDD
SITE 01
YfUNGSIChN
SITt 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA CITY
SITt 01
TULSA
SITt 01
OREG1N
tUGFN^
SITt 01
MEDFO"C
sm 01
PORTLAND
StTt 01
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLENTCWN
SITt 01
ALTOONA
SITt 01
BETHLKHF.M
SITt 01
ERIE
SITE 01
UANCASTFR
SITt ni
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ng/m3
1st
quar.
2.39
3.U
2.10
1.17
3.17
4.70
2.58
3.06
3. '4
5.20
9.35
6.60
2.29
4.61
2.24
4.19
3. 1H
13.58
.99
1.26
4.25
5.61
1.60
1.69
44.55
3.30
2.86
3.39
2nd
quar.
.96
1.94
1.37
1.20
1.63
2.26
1.29
1.04
.50
4.0"<
1.14
2.36
1.10
2.2S
.94
.81
1.49
5.71
.61
.30
1.20
/.76
3.76
2.79
13.55
2.14
2.41
1.60
3rd
quar.
.3°
4.3'
.6«
.36
1.4?
1.2*
.73
i.23
.2»
1.2-i
1.3A
1.7=
.89
1.14
.97
1.0"
1.64
6.09
.5*
• 4A
.6*
1.47
1.91
.97
8.70
4.34
1.35
.80
4lh
quar.
2.16
2.97
2.33
.62
7.90
4.80
2.97
3.21
2.95
5.24
13.40
2.10
3.12
3.56
2.43
8.86
1.24
7.28
.70
.'29
3.42
9.36
0.77
1.49
51.30
2.71
8.64
2.34
Yrly
avg.
1.47
3.0D
1.62
.84
3.53
3.26
1.89
2.14
1.87
3.94
6.34
3.71
1.85
2.39
1.65
3.74
1.89
8.17
.72
.60
2.38
4.79
3.51
1.79
29.53
2.87
3.82
2.03
Station location
•PHIL.AOILPHJA
SITE «1
PITTSBURGH
SITt 01
REAniNt
StTt 01
SCRANTON
SITE 01
aAR-INSTE"
SITt 01
BEST CHESTER
SITt 01
YORK
SITE ""I
PUERTO RICO
BAYAMON
SITt 11
GUAYANILLA
SITE 01
PONCE
SITt 01
SAN JUAN
SITE 01
RHODE ISLAND
EAST PROVlOfNCt
SITt 01
pROvlOtNCE
SITt 01
SOUTH CADQL1MA
COLUMBIA
SITt 01
TENNESSEF
"'CHATTANOOGA
SITE 11
>TNCXVILI.E
SITE 11
MEMPHIS
SITt 01
NASHVILLE
SlTfe 01
TEXAS
•/HOUSTON
SITI- 01
PASADEM
SITE 01
SAN ANTONIO
SITE 01
L'TAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
VIRGINIA
HAMPTON
SITt 01
LYNCHULRS
SITt 01
r.nRFOL*
SITE 01
Cf!RTS»CI'TM
SITE 01
RICHMOND
SIT* 11
RPAVOKE
StTt 11
fcASHIN&TCN
SFATTLE
SITt 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ng/m3
1st
quar.
9.03
6.38
5.47
6.86
3.26
1.92
2.89
.51
.21
.98
.92
2.13
3.05
5.44
6.67
6.26
2.78
6.32
.55
1.04
2.73
1.44
3.72
14.31
7.03
9.15
6.94
15. 7S
2.60
2nd
quar.
2.31
6.47
1.11
3.56
.99
.81
1.04
.1"
.37
.52
.35
1.20
2.09
.80
2.11
5.26
.9-5
1.44
1.11
.33
.50
.21
1.03
3.96
1.2"
3.20
2.01
1.61
l.cl
3rd
quar.
2.02
2.96
1.02
2.76
1.39
.3*
.5*
.29
.2*
.52
.91
1.34
2.10
.9'
3.44
l.8«
.67
1.24
.87
.4°
.41
.2*
.31
1.5°
.6?
.90
.75
.37
1.0"
4th
0.08
.i.ve
3.95
7.53
3. IP
1.22
2.49
.39
.33
.95
1.34
1.61
3.82
9.49
(9.23
14.66
1.99
18.90
2.71
.60
1.79
.'2
3.72
17.01
5.15
17.58
11. iO
11.63
2.6%
Yrty
avfl.
5.86
6.95
2.89
5.13
2.21
i.oa
1.75
.34
.29
.74
.88
1.57
2.77
4.17
!2.86
7.02
1.60
6.98
1.31
.61
1.36
.66
2.2n
9.22
3.52
7.71
5.23
T."*7
US?
-------
Table 3-4^continued). BENZO(a)PYRENE, URBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
WEST VIRGINIA
CHAP|_fSTON
STTh 01
K6NPSHA
SIT* 01
KADI SON
SITt 01
SITt 01
Year
67
67
67
67
Concentration. ng/m3
1st
quar.
2.87
2.46
1.64
4.78
2nd
quar.
1.5?
1.3!
.76
6.30
3rd
quar.
1.4n
.6"
.60
1.8*
4th
quar.
2.30
1.45
1.53
3.93
Yrly
avg.
2.03
1.48
1.13
4.23
Station location
CASPEW
SITt 01
SITt 01
Year
67
67
Concentration, ng/m3
1st
quar.
.42
.39
2nd
quar.
.71
.37
3rd
QU8T.
.44
• 26
4th
quar.
.48
.42
Yrty
avg.
.52
.36
48
-------
Table 3-5. BENZO(a)PYRENE, NONURBAN QUARTERLY AND YEARLY AVERAGES
Station location
ARt20"A
GRAMU CANVQN MAT OK
SITt 01
ARKANSAS
MDNTCUI'FPY rCL'HTY
Sm 01
CALIFOI'MA
HUMROLCT COl'MY
SITt 01
COLORADO
HbSA VEROE NAI PK
SITE 01
DEL '."ARE
KENT CCUNTY
SITt Cl
BUTTE COUNTY
SITt Cl
INDIANA
.vIONROt COUNTY
SITE 01
ftKff CCUNTY
SITt 01
"AINE
ACA"IA NATICKAL PARK
SITt 01
CALVEH1 COUNTY
SITt 01
JACKSON COWTY
SITt 01
flSSOUfl
SHANNON CnUriY
SITF 01
MONTANA
GL'CIHi HATIC''»L PABK
Sm 01
N£PRA$«f A
THOMA"< COI'NTY
SITt 01
.HIT* PINF CCU.TY
SITr 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ng/m3
1st
quar.
.20
.20
.64
.14
.53
.13
.30
.34
.23
.7B
.97
.33
.45
.14
.10
2nd
quar.
.11
.0"
.2?
.06
.27
.08
.2?
.31
.10
.01
.15
.11
.24
•°"
.07
3rd
quar.
.2">
.10
.33
.10
.3*
.10
.3"
.24
.41
.30
.14
.14
.3°
.10
.17
4m
quar.
.18
.14
.35
.08
.25
.11
.29
.24
.03
.14
.20
.10
.19
.18
.04
Yrly
avg.
.18
.13
.39
.10
.35
.11
.30
.28
.21
.35
.37
.17
.32
.13
.08
Station location
COOS CCUNTY
SITt 01
NEW "EX ico
RIU ARRIBA fCH.NTY
SITt 01
JEFFEPSON COUNTY
SITfc 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CARF HATTFRAS "AT SEU
sm «i
OKLAHO'A
CHE"OKEE COUNTY
SITt 01
ORE6PH
CURPY CCUNTY
SITE ni
PENNSYLVANIA
cLARint; COUNTY
SITt "1
RHODF ISLAND
wASHINC-TOM CCUIiTY
SITt 01
SOUTH CAROLINA
RICWLAKO COUNTY
SITE "1
SOUTH UAKOTA
BLACK I-ILLS NST FrKEST
SITF. 01
TEXA5
HATASnKnA CCL.MTY
SITt "1
VERMONT
OPANQt COUNTY
SITt 01
VIRGINIA
SHENANCrAH NATIONAL PK
SITt 01
DOOR CCI.'NTY
SITE 11
WYOMING
YELLOl«STO"£ PAKK
SITt ni
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
Concentration, ng/m3
1st
quar.
.36
.33
.33
.26
.38
.13
2.76
.67
1.35
.21
.12
.79
.58
.15
.IV
2nd
quar.
.00
.15
.21
.Of,
.0"
.06
1.74
.24
.13
.05
.OP
.37
.20
.17
3rd
quar.
.1'
.20
.31
.27
.00
.09
1.54
.24
.11
.11
.11
.26
.1?
.17
.00
4th
quar.
.0*
.1"
.12
.13
.20
.05
Z.37
.22
.49
.15
.09
.15
.21
.09
.04
Yrly
avj.
.17
.22
.24
.15
.19
.OS
2.10
.34
.52
.14
.11
.39
.28
.15
.07
-------
SECTION 4:
URBAN AND NONURBAN
NONMETALLIC INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS
-------
Table 4-1. AMMONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ICCATfN
ALAi)A«A
BTrif INC-HA>>
SITE 01
6CB5BC,.'
SITE 01
HI..TSVIUF
?ITE 01
UruUE
SITE "1
Mr:iTGO''FFV
MTE 0|
ALA5KA
AKCHCR'GE
SITF 02
f AIPSAt'KS
MTE 01
ARUONA
MA^tCOPA CCUfcTY
MTF 01
pi-CE^IX
MTF 02
KCSCN
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
LITTLE °-CC<
MTE 01
hL'ST MI-MPHIS
MTE 01
CAUFru'-IA
BLn'^ANK
SITE 02
6I.KNOALF
SITE 01
Lr.<6 9EACH
itTE 01
LCS ANPEIFS
SITE 01.
C'KLAMO
SITE 01
P«bAOE^A
«ITE 01
s-ii> OIFCC
•=1TE 01
S->< FSAWCISCO
SITE "1
Year
66
*6
67
66
67
66
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 «7
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
67
66
*>7
6* 67
A6
A7
bf, 67
66
66
67
6* A7
6t>
67
66 67
No. of
samples
25
26
Z6
26
26
23
26
26
52
24
26
50
25
24
49
26
25
M
25
26
26
25
26
25
51
25
25
50
25
24
49
26
25
»1
Concentration. iig/nv>
Mln
.1
.1
.1
.0
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
.t
.0
.0
.0
Frequency dlstrlbul on - percentlle
10
,1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
.0
20
.2
.3
.1
.1
.1
.1
30
.1
.4
,4
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
40
.5
.5
.1
.1
.1
.1
50
.1
.7
1.3
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
60
1.0
'.0
.3
.1
.1
.1
70
,7
1.2
3.6
.5
.1
.5
.2
80
2.1
».2
1.7
1.0
.2
.6
.2
90
1.0
3.9
5.0
2.1
2.1
.2
3.3
1.6
Max
.4
6.2
v.e
6.2
11.2
3.7
11.2
Aflth
.1
1.3
2.*
.7
.6
.6
.6
Geo
tiea/i
.1
,7
i.i
.3
.1
'.Z
sto
geo
dev
1.50
2.27
2.59
3.39
4. 24
3.94
3.26
2.93
3.64
3.28
•DiB contributed by sat* or local I
-------
Table 4-1 (continued). AIMONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
CCLC"T
(X.)vee
51TE 01
CCt.MECTIClT
HiSTFOffl
flTE 0)
Nc» I-AVEN
MTE 01
CELivARF
ftf ,,«3K
MTE 11
»li."I«lfiTCW
MTE 01
DC
Kt5"INr.Tl>'
MTE 01
GECSG1A
ATi-A«.'Tn
etTE 01
HA'wlI
Hri-rL'lLU
MTE 01
ICOHO
BrlsE
MTE ni
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO
MTE 01
E»ST ST LCUIS
MTE 01
RCCKFOSO
"=ITE 01
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
INDIANA
E«ST CHICAGO
SITE 01
HAM»CNO
SITE 01
Jf.JlANAPCLIS
SITE 01
Kt«CIE
••irE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
6* 67
*6
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. of
samples
25
26
»l
26
26
52
25
26
51
25
26
51
2*.
21
45
25
26
51
23
26
45
26
26
•>2
25
25
50
26
26
52
23
26
23
26
25
51
24
22
46
25
22
47
24
22
46
Concentration. yfl/m3
Mln
.3
.7
.3
.2
.*
.2
.0
.0
.c
.1
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
Frequency distribution - porcontlle
10
.4
l.l
.4
i:i
1.1
.1
.0
.0
.4
.1
.3
.0
.1
.1
.2
.5
.3
.1
.2
.1
20
.4
U2
.6
l. a
2.0
2.0
• I
.0
.0
.6
.2
.4
.1
.2
.2
.3
.6
.6
.1
.4
.2
30
.5
2.2
1.1
2.1
2.5
2,1
.2
.0
.0
.7
.5
.3
.3
.3
.7
.9
.7
.2
.5
.3
40
.8
2.6
2.3
2.7
2.5
.3
.0
.0
1.4
1.0
.8
.6
.5
.6
.8
.9
.9
.3
.6
.5
SO
1.2
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.8
.5
.0
.0
1.2
.9
.7
.6
.7
1.0
1.2
1.2
.3
.6
.6
60
1.5
2.9
3.3
2.9
3.2
.7
.0
.0
1.4
1.2
1.0
.9
.9
1.2
1.7
1.3
.8
1.0
.8
70
2.0
3.2
^.6
3.3
3.6
1.0
.0
.0
1.4
2.1
1.1
1.0
l.l
1.5
1.8
1.7
.9
1.0
1.0
80
2.6
4.2
4.6
3.9
3.9
1.7
.1
.1
1.8
2.3
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.6
1.3
1.4
90
4.1
5.9
5.2
4.7
5.2
2.1
.1
.1
2.0
3.1
2.8
1.9
2.3
4.7
3.1
3.5
2.4
1.4
2.0
Max
7.5
10.7
8.6
R.6
8.0
7.3
8.0
2.7
.1
.1
3.2
4.6
5.7
5.6
5.7
9.5
4.5
9.5
6. a
2.6
6.8
Arith
mean
1.7
2.4
J.I
2.7
1.1
•t.o
3.1
.8
.0
.0
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.7
1.5
1.6
t.o
.8
.9
Geo
•nean
1.2
1.5
2.6
2.0
2.5
2.6
2.6
.5
.0
.0
1.0
1.0
.6
.6
.6
1.0
1.2
1.1
.5
.7
.6
890
dev
1.48
2.50
2.83
1.86
2.93
2.41
2.11
1.94
2.03
3.13
1.00
1.00
1.89
3.01
2.14
2.43
3.47
3.06
3.26
3.01
2.31
2.66
3.61
2.17
2.89
•Data contiibuted by sttU or local agency.
-------
Tanle 4-1 (continued). AMMONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
NF-. 'L^ANY
SITE 02
5CUTH IttiO
SITE 01
TENSE HAUTE
SITE 01
ICVvA
CFJAR HAPIOS
SITE 01
0
-------
Table 4-1 (continued). AMMONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
MINNEAPOLIS
MTE "I
HrCRHEAD
EITE 01
ST. PAUL
MTE "I
MISSISSIPPI
JSCKSO1*
MTE 01
MI'SCLPI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
S'. L1UIS
MTE 01
MO T«H»
HFUENA
MTE 01
NEn-1
NE"A[>A
LAS VE^AS
SITE 01
RENO
MTF 01
NE'- HAMPSHIRE
CCNCCP":
MTE 01
NE" JERSEY
a'VPNNE
MTE 01
BLrfLlNSTC* CCUNTY
MTE 02
C'^OEN
?1TE 01
61ASSBCRC
ilTF 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
PAIEPS-"!
MTE 01
f"X1h AI'BCY
MTE 01
Year
«6
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 A7
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
9
10.7
6.0
4.4
6.0
M J
o«£
5.8
5«7
5.8
9.2
12.7
12.7
7.2
B.O
0.0
6.0
7.8
Arlth
mean
.4
.7
.6
.1
.6
.9
.8
.2
. 1
.2
.1
.9
1.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
^3
.8
1.4
t 1
1 . *
3.8
1.5
1.6
1.6
. e
^ • '
i.i
1 3
1 . *
1.2
3.4
3.7
3.*
1.9
3.2
2.6
2.6
4.2
Seo
•nean
.2
.4
.3
.1
.3
.3
.3
.1
.1
.2
.1
• 9
.5
.7
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
.1
.1
B2
.3
•»
5
4*>i
.8
.9
^g
1^
• '
.&
• 9
.7
2.1
2.8
2.4
1.3
2.6
1.9
2.3
3.5
Std
goo
dev'
2.76
3.51
3.13
1.32
3.31
3.98
3.64
1.95
1.72
2.16
1.95
331
. '*
3.43
3.32
1.59
1.66
1.63
1.73
1.78
1.76
1.00
1.21
1.14
2.18
3.71
3.33
3.52
2.05
3.63
3.36
3»50
2 TO
• 70
3,47
Zae
. 113
3.16
3.42
2.23
2,82
2.59
2.02
2.31
1.83
1.91
•Data contributed by Mitt or local agency.
-------
Table 4-1 (continued). AMMONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
TOcNTON
SITE 01
NEk MfXICC
AltfDCUETUE
SITE 01
NE'' YCHK
NF.i YO'K CITY
SITE 01
NCcTH CAPCLINA
Cl-ADLOTTE
SITE 01
OHIU
A!' JO-
SITE 01
CINCINNATI
SITE 0)
Cl cWEl'-«C
SITE 01
CCUMRUS
MTE "1
CM TON
MTE 01
TI-LECO
SITE 01
YfUMCSTOM
MTE "I
OKLAHOMA
QKLAHO"A CITY
MTE 01
TULSA
SITE 01
ORF50N
El OENE
SITE 01
MFDFCR1
SITE 01
PCRTLAMn
«ITE 01
PE> NSYL'/AMA
AI.LENTCW
MTE 01
Al.TPONA
MTE 01
Year
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
No. of
samples
21
25
26
51
24
21
45
26
25
51
25
26
51
25
25
5r>
Zfr
26
52
25
26
51
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
25
51
25
25
50
24
26
li
26
48
25
25
Concentration. jig/m3
Mln
.0
.6
.5
.5
.1
.2
.0
.0
.0
,0
.0
.0
.1
Frequency distribution - percentMe
10
.0
1.3
2.5
1.5
.1
.4
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.1
.3
20
.0
3.2
1.8
.3
.2
.6
.2
.0
.1
.0
.5
.5
30
.0
3.4
2.5
.2
1.1
.3
.0
.1
.0
.8
.6
40
.0
3.0
.4
.5
.0
.1
.1
.8
• 3
SO
.0
*.5
3.5
.5
1.0
,1
.1
.1
1.0
1.1
60
• 0
4.0
• 6
1.2
.1
.2
.1
1.5
1.3
70
.0
5.2
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.4
.1
.3
.2
f.i
1.5
80
.0
6.3
1.6
1.5
1.5
2.0
.1
.4
.4
3.8
1.6
90
.0
7.4
2.0
2.3
2.4
.8
.8
.8
9.1
2.4
Max
.1
8.7
2.8
3.6
4.1
10,1
7.6
1.1
1.6
1.6
7.8
3.1
Arlth
mean
.0
1.1
4.1
1.0
.0
1.1
1.2
.2
.3
.3
2.1
1.2
Get)
•nean
.0
2.6
4.3
3.3
.5
.7
.1
.2
1.2
.9
sea
geo
deV
1.00
1.91
1.97
1.94
2.86
2.19
3.14
3.09
2.37
2.*9
2.43
3.*3
2.45
•Date contributed by at»t» or loal igency.
-------
Table 4-1 (continued). AHUONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Br tHLEnEI'
C1TE 01
EfiE
'•1TE ni
L«.-«TTA'CCGA
"IT£ 01
Year
6
66
67
66 67
66
67
«6 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
6A 67
66
66
67
66 67
«6
S7
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
46
67
66 67
No. ol
samples
25
26
26
50
Z4
49
26
25
51
25
25
50
23
25
23
48
26
26
26
25
51
24
25
23
48
26
Z4
50
26
23
23
46
23
26
26
26
23
22
45
ConceruraUon, jig/m3
MID
.1
.1
.1
1 0
'.1
.0
.0
,0
.1
.0
.5
n
i
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
,1
,1
.1
.0
:°
,0
.0
.1
.0
.0
Frequency distribution - percent! le
10
.1
.3
.3
.8
.0
.3
.1
.1
.1
1.3
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.6
.6
.6
.0
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
20
.4
.5
.8
1.6
.1
.6
.2
.6
.2
1.7
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.7
.6
.7
.1
.2
.1
,1
.1
.1
.2
.1
30
.5
.7
1.6
2.0
.2
1.0
.3
t.o
.7
2.2
.3
,0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
1.0
.7
.9
.1
.2
.2
.2
.1
.3
.4
.3
40
.7
1.0
2.1
2.4
.4
1.2
.7
1.6
1.0
2.7
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
1.2
1.7
1.2
.1
.3
.2
.5
.1
.3
.4
.4
SO
1.0
1.2
2.3
2.8
1.1
1.4
.9
2.1
1.7
4.7
1.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.0
1.4
1.8
1.7
.2
.4
.3
mf
.1
.5
.6
.6
60
1.4
1.4
2.9
3.4
1.4
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.2
3,4
1.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.1
1.8
2.3
1.9
.3
.5
.5
I. 2
•l
.7
1,2
.8
70
1.7
1.9
3.4
1.6
1.6
Z.3
2.4
7.8
2.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.8
2.7
2.6
2.6
.8
l.O
1.5
• i
.9
1.6
1.2
80
2.1
2.7
4.1
4.3
1.8
2.5
3.0
2.6
2.9
8.0
2.3
.0
.0
,0
.0
.0
.0
,0
.0
*.8
3.0
3.6
3.0
l.l
1,6
1,3
1.5
,1
1.4
2.0
1.7
90
3.0
4.2
4.3
7.0
3.4
2.8
6.4
7.2
6.4
10.8
3,9
.0
.0
.0
.1
.1
.0
.1
.0
3.9
4.7
t!o
1.3
1.3
1.8
'.2
.2
2.4
2.0
2.3
Max
4.0
12.9
8.1
11.6
4.7
6.3
8.3
9.4
9.4
19.1
7.9
.1
.0
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
5.5
5.9
4.7
5.9
4.0
2.5
4.0
4.3
.3
4.0
3.1
4.0
Arfth
mean
1.3
2.0
3.4
1.3
1.6
2.1
2.4
5.4
1.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.&
2.0
1.9
2.0
.7
.7
.7
1.0
.1
>9
l|o
l.O
Gen
•nean
.8
1.2
1.9
2.5
.4
1.1
.9
1.3
1.1
3.8
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.0
U4
1.4
.3
.4
.4
.6
.1
.5
.7
.6
Std
3.15
2.96
2.80
2.36
3.78
2.68
4.38
3.79
4,08
2,49
3.14
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.30
1.20
2.97
2.96
2.56
2.56
3.50
2.86
3.18
».S4
i.je
3.20
3.02
3.11
*D«i contributtd by sal* «loal igncy.
-------
Table 4-1 (continued). AMMONIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
KI-CXVILLI-
*•£ CUV
SITE 01
VEP.-*«'T
BliiLllC-TCN
MTE 01
vipui':ii
DMVIUF
MTE 01
Hil-'PTC"
MTE 01
LvNCh«(,HC
SITE 01
NMFCL"'
SITE 0)
PfriTS'lCljTH
SITE 01
RICH«0»m
SITE 01
R'ANCKF
SITE 01
fcASMIHGTnw
SFATTLE
SITE 01
HES! VIOGIMA
CI-ARLESTCN
«1TE 01
WISCONSIN
KFNOSHA
'ITE 01
Year
67
66
67
6* 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
6«. 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
A7
6*. 67
67
No. of
samples
24
26
26
52
24
2S
49
26
52
24
25
25
50
24
24
25
4V
25
23
26
26
26
25
51
26
26
25
26
26
52
22
26
48
26
Cone«n!rat on, ug/m3
Mln
.1
»
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.1
.0
.2
.0
.0
Frequency distribution - percentile
10
.2
.0
.0
.1
.1
.4
.4
.4
.1
20
.2
.0
.0
.2
.2
i.O
.9
.9
.1
30
.3
.0
.0
.3
.5
l.S
1.1
1.5
.1
40
.3
.0
.0
.5
2.1
i.e.
1.9
.2
50
.5
.0
.0
• &
4,1
2.0
3.7
.3
60
• 0
.0
.7
7.2
*.9
6.2
.4
70
.1
.0
1.1
13.2
U.7
11.7
.6
80
.3
.0
1.3
19.5
13.5
14. 6
.6
90
.7
.1
2.2
21.5
27.2
23.3
1.6
Max
2.4
1.0
5.9
23.9
71.2
71.2
?.l
Arlth
mean
.2
.1
.9
8.2
10.1
9.2
.5
Geo
•nean
.2
.1
.6
3.8
3.2
3.5
.3
su
yea
dev'
2.96
1.32
2.55
1.65
2.86
2.95
*.62
*.93
*.7S
2,74
•Dan contributed by state 01 local agency.
59
-------
Table 4-1 (continued). AIMOMUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LCCiTlCN1
hlSCOKSIN
KSOISOV
«1TF nl
*n.WAU"EE
5 ITS 01
wif.-itrG
OSPER
sire PI
C|-£VFNVF
sin m
Year
67
66
AT
6ft *T
67
66
A7
6A *7
No. of
samples
26
26
26
11
Z5
76
50
Concentration. jig/mS
Mln
.1
.0
Frequency distribution - percenllle
10
.0
20
.0
30
.1
40
.1
SO
.1
60
.1
ro
.1
80
.1
90
.1
Max
.1
.2
Arllh
mean
.1
.1
Gao
•aean
.0
.0
Std
geo
dev-
1.00
1.17
•Data contributed by attta ot local •gency.
-------
Table 4-2. AMMONIUM, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
KCUTGO"EFY COUNTY
SITE "I
CALIFOR'II*
HU^BCLIT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VtRDE NAT PK
SUE 01
DELAWARE
K'«T CCUMY
«m 01
lOoHt
Bl FTE COUNTY
MTE 01
I Nf I ANA
Crt(RCE COUNTY
MTt 01
PA«KE COUNlY
«ITE 01
1C'* A
QcLAkiBE CCU«TY
MTE 01
MAINE
ACAOIA NAT PK
SITE 01
MARYLAND
CALVEST COUNTY
«ITE 01
MISSISSIPPI
JfCKSCK COUNTY
<|TE 01
MISSOURI
SHANNON CCUNTY
5ITE "1
MONTANA
GLACIER NAT PK
SITE 01
NEOKASKA
Tl-CMAS COUNTY
MTE ni
NEVADA
W-ITE PINE CCUNTY
"-1TE 01
Year
66
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 6?
66
67
66 67
No. or
samples
25
50
^\>
50
24
f>
49
25
49
25
Zi
50
25
22
24
46
2i
21
46
?3
24
44
25
26
•il
26
SI
24
48
24
25
49
26
25
51
22
23
45
Concentration, pg/m3
Min
.0
.0
,0
*
.0
•
.0
•°
• '
• *
*
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
Frequency distribution • percent tie
10
.0
.0
• *
• '
•
.(
•(
*
*
"
•
*J
•
•
20
.0
.0
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.(
.
• 1
;;
•
*
a>
•
•
•
30
.0
.0
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.
•
• l
*
•
•
•
•
40
.0
.1
.1
.1
.0
.1
.0
.1
e
• ,
.t
•
• <
• '
•
'
•
•
so
.1
1
.1
.1
.1
.1
\
.0
•
*
• 1
•
*
*
•
•
•
60
.1
• '
•
1.4
•
.2
"
•
•
•
70
.1
t I
.1
• 2
•,
• '
1.1
i.e
• '
•
*
* •
1
i.
•
•
•
•
•
•
80
.1
.1
.1
. i
•
1.2
1.9
1.9
L«
.
'
1.
2.
1.
*
•
•
*>
•
•
90
.1
. 1
.1
.4
.4
.2
2.6
3.1
1.6
U5
2.1
i.e
2.
2.
2.
U
1,
1.
*
•
Max
•
1.1
"
4.6
4.1
6.2
1.5
6.i
10.1
l.<
10. <
1.!
5.
5.
3.
4,
4,
2.
1.
2.
2.
2.
2.
•
•
•
•
Anth
mean
.1
.1
"
U2
•\
.1
.
•
•
1
; ;
i •
Geo
•nean
.0
,'j
.0
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.0
.1
.4
.7
.1
.3
1
ft
• 2
• 2
.1
.1
.2
.1
.4
.6
i
• *
• •
• «
a<
• •
* .
• <
• <
• <
Std
yso
eeV
1. 00
1. 00
i.o:
1.67
1.99
1.63
1.52
1.15
4.00
3.20
3.60
1.29
3.65
2.83
3.24
3.47
2.72
3.09
£.10
1.49
2.71
2.14
3.14
3.33
3.23
2.2*
2.58
2.53
2.88
2.71
1.26
1.43
1.42
1.43
1.43
1.41
1.3*
1.3S
•Data contrilwttd by aata of local agancy.
61
-------
Table 4-2 (continued). AIMON1UM, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
NE>' HAXPSMKF
CCOS CCONTY
S1TF "1
NE'» MEXICC
HlU AHOjeA COUNTY
•=ITE 01
NE- YC
26
51
Concentration, jig/m3
Mln
.0
.1
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
Io
.1
.0
.0
.u
."
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
.1
.1
.0
.0
.1
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
.0
20
.2
.2
.0
,0
.1
.2
.1
.0
.0
.0
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
.0
30
.2
.2
.0
.0
.3
.3
.1
.0
.1
.0
.1
.4
.1
.1
.1
.0
.1
40
.2
.3
.0
.0
.5
.4
.1
.0
.1
.1
.1
.5
.2
.1
.1
.0
.1
SO
.3
.4
.0
.0
.9
.5
.1
.0
.1
.1
.2
.6
.3
.1
.1
.0
.1
60
• 5
• 8
• 0
.0
1.0
.9
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
1.0
.5
.1
.1
.1
.1
70
1.0
.9
.1
.0
1.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
l.»
.6
.2
.1
.1
.1
60
1.8
1.8
.1
.0
1.9
.1
.1
.1
.1
«::
.9
.4
.1
.1
.1
90
3.0
2.2
.2
.0
3.4
.1
.1
.1
.3
1.4
2.2
1.9
.6
.1
.1
.1
Max
5.3
5.4
.5
.0
6.5
.2
.1
.5
1.6
1.6
6.3
4.4
1.9
.1
.1
.1
Artlh
mean
.9
1.0
.1
.0
1.0
1.3
1."
1.3
.1
.0
.1
.1
.4
1.1
.7
I
.3
.1
.1
.1
Geo
•neen
.5
.5
a
.0
.6
.1
.0
.1
.1
.2
.7
.3
/
.2
.0
.0
.0
Sid
£•
3.22
3.41
1.46
1.00
3.25
3.49
3.30
1.15
1.00
1.59
1.81
2.84
2.T6
2.98
Z.*l
1.00
1.00
1.00
•Data contributed by Kali w local agency.
-------
Table 4-3. FLUORIDES, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ALA8APA
BIRMINGHAM
SITE 01
GADSDEN
SITE 01
HLNTSVILLE
SITE 01
MOBILE
SITE 01
MCNTGO"ERY
SITE 01
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 02
FAIRBANKS
SITE 01
ARIZONA
HARIC09A COUNTY
SITE 01
PHOENIX
SITE 02
TUCSON
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK
SITE 01
NEST MFMPHIS
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BllKBANK
SITE 02
GLENDALE
SITE 01
LONG BEACH
SITE 01
LCS ANGELES
SITE 01
OAKLAND
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
Vear
66
66
67
66
67
66
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
(6 67
66
66
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
26
26
26
26
20
23
26
26
•52
24
26
90
25
24
49
26
25
M
25
26
26
25
26
25
51
25
25
50
25
Above
dated.
quan.
16
1
1
0
4
2
3
1
0
1
0
3
3
4
4
8
2
3
5
0
0
0
0
1 1
0
1
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
ug/m3
1.25
.07
.07
.47
.13
.13
.06
.06
.06
.06
.09
.08
.09
.05
.21
.21
.08
.08
Station location
SAN DIEGC
SITE 01
SAN FRANCISCU
SITE 01
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE 01
CONNECTICUT
HARTFORD
SITE 01
NEW HAVEN
SITE 01
DELAWARE
NEWARK
SITE 01
WILMINGTON
SITE 01
DC
VlASHINGTCN
SITE 01
GEORGIA
ATLANTA
SITE 01
HAhAM
HONOLULU
SITE 01
IDAHO
BOISE
SITE 01
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO
SITE 01
EAST ST LCUIS
SITE ' 01
RCCKFORO
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
23
48
26
24
50
25
26
51
26
24
50
25
26
51
25
26
11
24
21
45
25
26
51
23
26
49
26
26
52
25
24
49
26
76
52
23
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
12
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
7
6
13
0
0
0
3
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
7
20
8
1
Max.
cone.,
ug/m3
.11
.23
.23
.20
.38
.38
.19
.31
.31
.12
.47
.47
.42
.20
.42
1.74
.07
63
-------
Table 4-3 (continued). FLUORIDES, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
SITE 01
HAMMCNC
SITE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
SITE 01
MLNCIE
SITE 01
NEW ALnANY
SITE 02
SCUTH REI>'0
SITE 01
TEBRE hALTE
SITE 01
lOttA
CEDAR CAPIOS
SITE 01
DAVENPCRT
SITE 01
DES MOIRES
SITE 01
DLBUOUE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
TOPEKA
SITE 01
KICHITA
SITE 0]
KENTUCKY
ASHLANO
SITE 01
COVINSTON
SITE 01
Year
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
23
26
25
51
23
22
45
25
22
47
24
22
46
24
24
24
48
22
25
25
25
25
•SO
26
25
51
23
26
25
25
50
24
25
Z5
50
Above
delect
quan.
1
17
22
39
a
10
18
0
0
0
0
1
1
6
2
0
2
0
0
3
7
6
13
1
0
1
3
2
2
0
2
6
1
0
1
Max.
cone. ,
ug/m3
.15
.54
.45
.54
.52
1.03
1.03
.06
.06
.21
.29
.29
.08
.08
.24
.24
.18
.18
.17
.06
.08
.08
.39
.08
.08
Station location
LEXINGTON
SITE 01
LOUISVILLE
SITE 01
LOUISIANA
NEVi ORLEANS
SITE 02
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE
SITE 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
SITE 01
FLINT
SITE 01
6RANO RAPIDS
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
DULUTH
SITE 01
MINNEAPOLIS
SITE 01
KOORHEAD
SITE 01
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
ST. LOUIS
SITE 01
MONTANA
HELENA
SITE 01
Year
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. ol samples
Col lee
ted
26
25
26
51
26
26
52
26
25
51
26
23
49
25
25
26
26
26
52
26
25
26
51
26
24
26
50
24
25
49
26
26
52
Above
detect.
quan.
0
6
10
16
4
7
11
12
10
22
13
9
22
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
5
5
10
3
2
5
1
1
2
Max.
cone.,
ug/m*
.53
.34
.53
.50
.27
.50
.61
.40
.61
.57
.40
.57
.17
.06
.20
.20
.12
.23
.14
.23
.19
.13
.19
.07
.05
.07
-------
Table 4-3 (continued). FLUORIDES, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
NEBRASKA
OCAHA
SITE 01
NEVADA
LAS VEGAS
SITE 01
NEVADA
RENO
SITE 01
NEh HAMPSHIRE
CCNCOHD
SITE 01
NEW JERSEY
BftYONNE
SITE 01
BLHLINGTON COUNTY
SITE 02
CAMREN
SITE 01
GLASSBORO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
PATEHSCN
SITE 01
PERTH »»BOY
SITE 01
TRENTON
SITE 01
NEh MEXICO
ALBUOUEROUE
SITE 01
NEU YORK
NEK YOtK CITY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
67.
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
6* 67
67
67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
26
SI
26
26
52
25
26
26
52
23
26
26
52
25
26
26
52
23
25
43
25
25
50
25
25
21
24
26
24
21
45
26
25
SI
Above
detect.
quan.
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
S
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
.06
.06'
.25
.25
.20
.05
.05
.10
.11
.11
Station location
OHIO
AKRON
SITE 01
CINCINNATI
SITE 01
CLEVELauP
SITE 01
COLUMBIA
SITE 01
DAYTON
SITE 01
TOLEDO
SITE 01
YOUNGSTOWN
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHO"* CITY
SITE 01
TLLSA
SITE 01
OREGON
fcLGENE
SITE 01
MEOFfiR!)
SITE 01
PORTLAND
SITE 01
PENNSYLVANIA
sm '01
ALTOflNA
SITE 01
BETHLEHEM
SITE 01
ERIE
SITE 01
LANCASTER
SITE 01
Year
66
67
6* 67
66
67
6* 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
26
51
25
25
*>•'/
ft
26
52
25
26
51
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
25
'1
Z5
25
50
24
25
22
26
48
25
25
25
26
26
24
so
Above
detect.
qyan.
5
2
7
3
2
5
11
7
18
3
0
3
4
2
6
1
2
3
15
11
26
0
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
13
15
28
S
Z
11
0
1
0
1
Max.
cone..
_Q/m3
.19
.09
.19
.10
.16
.16
.17
.36
.36
.12
.12
.24
.08
.24
.10
.16
.16
.41
.34
.41
.06
.06
.08
.05
.08
.83
1.54
1.54
.16
.09
.37
.37
.37
-------
Table 4-3 (continued). FLUORIDES, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 01
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
READING
SITE 01
SCRANTON
SITE 01
fcARMINSTER
SITE 01
KEST CHESTER
SITE 01
YORK
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
BAYAMON
SITE 01
CATANO
SITE 01
6UAYANILLA
SITE 01
PCNCE
SITE 01
RHODE ISLAND
EAST PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
SOLTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA
SITE 01
SOLTH CAROLINA
GREENVILLE
SITE 01
SOLTH DAKOTA
SIOUX FALLS
SITE 01
TENNESSEE
CHATTAM006A
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
6T
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
47
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
24
26
50
26
25
51
25
25
50
23
25
23
48
26
26
26
25
51
24
25
23
48
26
24
50
26
24
Z3
47
23
26
49
26
26
23
22
45
Above
detect.
quan.
7
11
18
17
22
39
18
9
27
8
1
0
1
0
1
13
6
19
1
0
0
0
7
9
16
0
2
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
9
7
16
Max.
cone..
uB/m*
.34
.52
.52
.35
.80
.80
1.89
.76
1.89
.53
.08
.08
.13
.35
.23
.35
.18
.54
.47
.54
.07
.07
.08
.08
.70
.40
.70
Station location
KNCXVILLE
SITE 01
MEMPHIS
SITE 01
NASHVILLE
SITE 01
TEXAS
DALLAS
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAN ANTCNIO
SITE 01
UTAH
OGOEN
SITE 01
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
VERMONT
BURLINGTON
SITE 01
VIRGINIA
DANVILLE
SITE 01
HAMPTON
SITE 01
LYNCH8URG
SITE 01
NORFOLK
SITE 01
PORTSMOUTH
SITE 01
RICHMOND
SITE 01
RCANCKE
SITE 01
Year
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
No. ol samples
Collec-
ted
24
26
26
52
24
25
49
24
26
25
51
24
25
25
50
24
24
25
49
25
23
26
26
26
25
51
26
26
25
Above
detect.
quan.
13
5
0
5
16
13
29
3
S
8
13
3
4
0
4
1
9
S
14
0
0
1
1
2
4.
6
5
0
.'
Max.
cone..
ug/m'
1.05
,28
.28
.84
1.20
1.20
.08
.13
.62
.62
.51
.13
.13
.05
.14
.16
.16
.24
.11
.38
.32
.38
.19
.29
66
-------
TaW« 4-3 (continued). FLUORIDES, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
WASHINGTON
SEATTLE
SITE 01
WEST VI3GINIA
CHARLESTON
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
KENOSHA
SITE 01
MADISON
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
47
6A 67
67
67
No> of samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
1Z
22
26
46
26
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
4
1
5
0
0
Max.
cone.,
pg/m3
.45
.23
.45
Station location
WISCONSIN
MILWAUKEE
SITE 01
WYOMING
CASPER
SITE 01
CHEYENNE
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
S2
26
26
24
50
Above
delect.
quan.
4
4
8
0
0
0
0
Ma*.
cone..
ufl/m3
.24
.13
.24
67
-------
Table 4-4. FLUORIDES, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
GKAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
HCNTSI-FRY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFOS-MA
HLMSnuDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLURADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
DELAWARE
KENT COUNTY
SITE 01
IDAHO
BLTTE COUNTY
SITE 01
INDIANA
HO URGE COUNTY
SITF 01
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
ICUA
OELA*AO.E COUNTY
SITF 01
MAINE
ACAOIA NAT PK
SITE 01
MARYLANr>
CALVERT COUNTY
SITE 01
MISSISSIPPI
JACKSO'' COUNTY
SITE 01
MISSOURI
SHANNO" COUNTY
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
47
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
6* 67
66
47
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
25
50
25
25
50
24
25
49
25
24
49
25
25
50
25
22
24
46
25
21
46
23
24
20
<•<,
25
26
51
26
25
51
24
24
48
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
)
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
ug/m3
.05
.05
.10
.10
.08
.08
Station location
MONTANA
GLACIER NAT PK
SITE OL
NEBRASKA
THOMAS COUNTY
SITE 01
NEVADA
HHITE PINfc COUNTY
SITE 01
NEV< HAMPSHIRE
CCOS COUNTY
SITE 01
NEk MEXICO
RIO ARRIBA COUNTY
SITE 01
NEW YORK
JEFFERSON COU"TY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CAPE HATTEKAS
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
CHERCKEE COUNTY
SITE 01
OREGON
CURRY COUNTY
SITE 01
PENNSYLV4MA
CLARION COUNTY
SITE 01
RHODE ISLAND
WASHINGTON COUNTY
SITE 01
SOUTH CA10LINA
RlCHLAflD COUNTY
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
A7
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Col lee
ted
24
24
48
26
25
51
22
23
45
26
26
52
24
23
47
26
26
52
23
23
46
26
2;
•>l
24
25
49
24
24
48
23
24
47
26
25
51
Above
delect.
quan.
9
0
9
0
0
0
7
0
7
0
0
0
2
0
z
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Max.
cone.,
ug/m3
.08
.08
.06
.06
.05
.05
.05
.05
68
-------
Table 4-4 (continued). FLUORIDES, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
SOUTH DAKOTA
BLACK HILLS NAT FOR
SITE 01
TEXAS
MATAGOSBA COUNTY
SITE 01
VERMONT
ORANGE COUNTY
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
25
50
23
25
46
26
25
51
Above
detect.
quan.
2
3
5
0
0
0
2
0
2
Max.
cone. .
pQ/n>3
.09
.16
.16
.09
.09
Station location
VIRGINIA
SH6NANOOAH NAT PK
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
OCCR COUKTY
SITE 01
WYOMING
YELLOWSTONE PARK
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
25
26
51
20
25
26
51
Above
detect
quan.
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
Max
cone..
ufl/m3
.07
.07
69
-------
Table 4-5. NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
LCCAIIC*
AL'.iA!'A
KiTSVILLE
fraiLE
^r'. 5
5.9
4.4
5.0
2.3
4.8
3.2
2.7
3.3
2.9
1.6
2.0
2.0
70
1.4
2.1
1.8
2.7
3.4
2.9
1.3
1.9
1.7
2.2
2.4
4.9
6.6
5.0
6.0
3.1
5.2
4.0
3.1
4.0
3.7
2.1
2!?
60
1.5
2.3
2.0
3.2
3.8
3.7
1.5
2.1
1.9
2.4
2.7
5.3
7.3
6.0
6.8
3.2
5.4
5.2
3.7
4.9
4.6
2.9
5.9
4.4
90
1.7
2.6
2.3
\'\
4.7
1.8
2.7
2.2
2.7
2.8
7.2
8.5
7.0
7.4
4.0
10.1
6.7
4.9
6.0
5.5
4.8
9.6
7.0
Men
2.2
3.7
3.7
6.0
8.4
8.4
2.6
3 2
3.2
3.8
3.0
•(.1
10.3
8.0
10. 3
6.7
11.3
11.3
6.3
8.3
8.3
8.0
10.5
10.5
Arlth
mean
1.2
1.8
1.5
2.6
2.9
2.8
1.3
1.5
1.8
1.8
3.1
4.8
5.2
4.3
4.8
2.3
4.7
1.5
2.7
2l*
2.0
3.5
2.8
Qeo
TOOT
1.1
1.7
1.3
2.3
2.5
2.4
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.6
3.3
3.5
4.5
3.8
4.2
1.8
4.0
2.7
3.3
2.3
2.1
2.2
1.4 ;
2.3
1.8
jeo
dev
1.66
1.62
1.64
1.71
1.66
i.6B
1.29
1.40
1.62
1.67
1.70
2.32
1.81
1.64
1. 73
1.94
UB7
1.90
1.83
,*'*
:|s9
!.32
.56
,44
70
•Data nntributed k( Matt or local agency.
-------
Table 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
cCLCRAnr
Cf.jVER
MTE 01
CO».»ECTICLT
HA3TFORD
SITE 01
NF* HAVEN
MTE 01
DELAWARE
NFKARK
SITE "1
ftlLMINQTCN
SITE 01
DC
ItASHINGTCN
SITE 01
OEf.rlGIi
ATLANTA
SITE 01
HA*Alt
HCHnLIJlU
SITE 01
IDAHO
BC ME
SITE 01
ILLINOIS
CMCAfiC
SITE 01
EAST ST LCUIS
SUE 01
HCCKFOPO
SITE 01
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
INDIANA
EaST CHlCftGC
SITE 01
HAWCNO
MTE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
SITE 01
W..JCIE
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
46
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
<,7
66 67
66
67
6* 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
6A 67
No. ol
samples
25
26
51
26
26
52
25
26
51
25
26
51
24
Zl
45
Z5
26
51
23
26
49
26
26
52
25
25
50
26
26
52
23
Z6
23
26
Z5
51
24
22
46
25
22
47
24
22
46
Concentration, pg/m3
Mln
.6
.4
.1
.1
i.°
.7
.4
.4
.1
44
1.0
.6
.5
.5
.6
.5
.4
.6
.4
1."
.2
.2
.2
1.3
.2
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
.8
.8
.3
.5
1.3
.7
.7
1.2
.8
.6
1.0
.7
1.3
1.4
1.3
.8
1.4
1.1
20
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.0
1.0
.5
.7
1.4
!
1.0
.8
1.3
1.3
.9
1.2
1.0
1.4
1.8
1.7
1.1
1.4
1.4
30
1.3
1.6
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.3
.9
.9
1.6
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.7
1,2
1.7
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.5
40
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.2
1.0
1.8
2.0
2.2
1.6
1.9
1.3
1.9
1.4
1.7
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.7
50
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.9
2.1
2.4
2.1
2.2
1.4
2.2
1.8
1.9
2.4
2.1
1.9
2.1
2.0
60
1.9
us
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.7
1*6
*.i
4.3
3.1
2.2
2.4
1.5
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.6
2.4
2.1
2.3
2.2
70
2.2
1.9
2.3
2.1
1.9
2.3
2.1
1.7
'.6
2.7
3.6
2.4
3.»
2.1
3.6
2.5
2.4
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
M
2.7
M
2.3
2.3
2.9
2.7
1.9
2.6
2.9
4.5
3.0
3.5
2.8
3.9
3.7
2.7
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.8
2.7
90
3.5
2.7
3.4
2.7
2.9
4.4
3.5
2.3
i.2
.3.0
6.2
3.3
5.0
4.9
*.a
».">
3,0
*.5
4.1
2.9
3.9
3.1
Max
4.5
3.9
3.9
4.4
5.2
4.5
6.3
<•.*
4.0
8.8
5.2
B.B
6.2
A. 4
8.4
5.2
5.3
5.3
4.0
7.2
7.2
Arlth
mean
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.7
2.0
1.7
1.5
4.1
t.l
2.9
2.2
2.6
2.0
2.8
2.4
2.1
2.5
2.3
1.9
2.4
2.2
Geo
•nean
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.2
1.2
2.0
1.8
2.3
1.9
2.1
1.5
2.2
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.1
1.6
2.1
1.9
Std
9»°
Hex'
1.60
1.60
1.37
1.55
1.46
1.80
1.82
2.66
1.90
1.44
1.79
Z.JO
1.72
1.97
2.09
1.97
2.03
1.46
1.96
1.73
1.96
1.53
».T5
•Dan contributed by SIM* or local agrncy.
-------
Table 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
NFX ALWY
SITE 02
SCoTH SEND
SITE 01
T£*R£ HAUTE
SITE 01
ICO
CPCA3 OAPIDS
51Tf 01
DAVE-MOOPT
MTE 01
Ota "OTWS5
SITE 01
01 •JIirjuE
MTE ni
KAI.SAS
ICUSAS CITY
?IT£ 01
TC?EKA
<=1TE 01
AlCHITA
SITE 01
KE« TUCKY
AS-ILANO
SITE 01
CCVIN'GTON
MTE 01
tFAlNGTON
SITE 01
LCUI5VILLE
SITE 01
LCUSIA'lA
NF.« ORLEANS
MTE 02
HASfLAND
BALTIMORE
SITE 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
SITE 01
FLINT
^ITE 01
6RAND SAP1D5
MTE 01
MINNESOTA
DtLUTH
SITE 01
Year
66
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
6(
67
66 67
67
67
66
No. of
samples
24
24
24
48
2Z
ZS
25
25
25
50
26
Zb
51
23
26
25
25
50
24
25
25
50
26
25
26
51
26
26
52
26
25
51
26
23
49
25
25
26
Concentration, yg/m3
Mln
.1
.2
.0
.7
.3
.7
.4
.4
.4
.3
.2
.1
.2
.2
.2
.7
.2
.2
.9
.2
.8
.8
.8
.9
.5
.2
.2
.1
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
.5
.5
.0
1.1
.5
1.0
.7
.7
.6
.5
.5
.6
1.0
1.1
I. I
i:l
1.4
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
.6
.9
.2
20
1.3
.6
1.5
.9
1.0
1.0
.9
1.0
.6
.7
.9
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.5
1.7
1.1
1.5
1.2
1.3
.9
1.0
.2
30
4.0
.9
1.7
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.1
.9
.9
1.2
2.0
1.7
1.3
2.0
1.7
1.9
1.5
1.7
1.3
1.9
1.1
1.3
.3
40
2.3
1.0
1.9
1.1
1.6
l.l
1.3
1.1
1.1
l.S
2.2
2.0
1.7
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.9
1.9
2.6
1.1
1.5
.4
50
4.4
1.2
£.1
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.3
1.2
1.6
2.S
2.2
1.9
2.2
2.0
2.2
1.8
2.0
2.8
2.8
1.7
1.6
.5
60
2.6
1.5
2.4
1.9
2.1
1.5
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.9
2.8
2.5
2.0
2.9
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.3
3.1
3.4
1.9
1.9
• 8
70
4.7
1.7
2.8
2.4
2.4
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.5
2.4
3.1
2.8
2.5
4.0
2.9
2.7
2.4
2.5
3.7
3.8
2.0
2.1
1.1
80
t.l
2.1
3.1
2.6
2.5
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.8
2.5
4,0
3.1
2.6
*.2
3.8
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.3
*.7
2.3
2.8
1.3
80
5.2
2.6
4.1
2.8
3.5
2.6
3.2
2.6
2.4
2.9
«.*
4.1
3.8
5.0
3.8
3.1
3.6
4.8
6.3
4.9
*.3
4.1
Max
9.8
5.1
5.2
3.8
4.6
9.0
3.5
3.7
3.8
7.8
6.9
6.9
7.0
7.1
5.5
6.2
6.2
6.3
9.3
9.8
5.4
3.5
Arlth
mean
2.8
1.5
.2.4
1.7
2.0
1.'
1.7
1.6
t.4
1.4
1.9
2.8
2.5
2.2
2.7
2.4
2.1
2.3
2.8
1.3
2.0
*.o
.9
Geo
Tiean
2.0
H
2.1
1.4
1.8
1.*
i.«
1.1
1.2
1.*
2.4
2.1
1.8
2.2
2.2
1.9
2.1
3.1
2.2
2l6
1.5
1.6
.0
Sid
33
2.64
2.07
1.60
1.97
1.63
1.50
1.97
1.75
1.88
2.01
1.83
2.25
1.78
1.83
1.93
1.80
1.50
1.64
1.57
1.87
2.02
1.45
2.15
2.12
2.69
•Dm comrihmd by «M> m Mri
-------
Tanle 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
"IrtNEAPCLTS
SITE 01
PrcuhEAn
SITE 01
SI. PAUL
"ITE 01
WI'SISMPPI
J»CKSO'I
SITE 01
PI«5CU3
Min
,4
,2
.3
.3
.2
.1
.1
.1
.3
.4
,4
.1
.6
.4
.3
.3
.6
.2
.2
.3
.1
Frequency distribution • percent! le
10
.5
.5
.4
.5
.6
.6
.6
.4
.6
>6
.6
.3
.9
.5
.5
.5
.9
.5
.6
.3
,4
20
.5
.8
.a
1.3
1.3
.8
1.0
.6
1.0
• 9
UO
.4
1.2
.7
.6
.7
1.0
.8
.9
.4
.6
30
.9
1.0
i.O
1.7
1.5
1.0
1.1
.8
1.2
1.0
1.1
.6
1.5
.8
.8
.8
1.1
1.1
1.1
.6
.7
40
.1
1.5
l.l
.9
.8
.2
.3
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.3
.7
1.6
.9
.9
.9
1.1
1.3
1.3
.7
.8
50
1.3
1.5
1.2
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.6
1.3
1.4
.a
1.7
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.1
1.0
60
1.4
1.9
1.3
2.3
2.2
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.9
1.4
1.6
.9
1.8
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.6
l.l
1.0
70
i.a
2.1
1,8
2.6
2.3
2.2
1.9
2.2
2.2
1.5
1.9
1.2
2.0
1.6
l.B
1.7
1.7
2.1
1.7
1.7
1.3
80
2.0
2.6
1.8
3.0
2.5
2.9
2.2
2.9
2.3
1.8
2.3
1.5
2.6
i.a
1.9
1.9
1.7
2.6
1.9
1.9
1.5
90
2.5
3.7
2.2
3.6
3.2
3.3
3.1
*.3
?'?
2.4
2.7
2.0
2.9
2.0
2.8
2.7
1.9
3.6
2.6
2.5
2.3
Max
6.3
6.6
3.0
4.4
4.4
3.4
3.7
6.0
3.3
4.3
4.3
10.1
1.6
2.1
3.7
3.9
3.9
2.4
6.4
6.4
2.7
i.Z
Aritn
mean
1.5
1.9
1.3
2.1
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.8
1.1
1.5
U*
1.2
U*
1.0
1.3
l.»
t»*
1.4
1.9
l.T
1.2
l.l
Ceo
•nean
1.2
1.*
1.2
1.8
1.7
t'?
1.4
1.3
}'?
1.3
1.4
.a
i.7
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.4
1.0
.9
SID
geo
dev'
1.95
2.33
2.15
1.76
1.99
1.87
2.22
1.94
2.60
1.84
1.71
1.75
2.42
2.23
1.58
2.00
1.73
1.97
1.85
1.44
2.19
1.84
2.11
2.07
•D«t. contribubrf by Hit. «local agency.
73
-------
Table 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
MTE 01
NE'- MEXICO
ALHUSUERCUE
MTE 01
NE1. YORl.
Nf.i Y1BK CITY
MTE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
SITE 01
OHIO
AUSOH
MTE 01
CI..CIWATT
MTE 01
MTt *0l
ilTE 01
D'YTCN
31TE 01
S1TF 01
YPUNGSTOK*
MTE 01
OKI AHCMA
CKI-AhO''A CITY
MTE 01
TlLSA
MTE 01
CRF6CN
ELGENE
MTE 01
SITE 'oi
PCRTUA-O
MTt 01
ALLE-'ITC»I"
MTE 01
AITOCNA
51TE 01
Year
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
No. of
samples
21
K
26
51
24
21
45
26
25
51
25
26
51
25
25
50
26
26
52
25
26
51
26
Z6
52
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
25
51
25
50
26
22
26
48
25
25
Concentration, vg/m3
Uin
.6
.1
.8
.4
.2
.7
.4
.4
.2
.3
,4
.3
.4
.3
.4
.3
.6
.2
.2
.2
.8
.2
.4
.4
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
.8
1.0
.6
.5
1.3
.9
.5
.7
.5
.7
.6
.6
1.0
.9
.9
.6
.4
.8
1.0
.8
.6
.7
20
.9
1.1
1.8
1.3
.7
.9
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.2
.9
1.4
1.1
1.1
.9
1.0
1.4
2.7
1.4
1.1
.9
30
1.0
1.1
1.7
1.7
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.4
3.1
2.1
2.3
1.3
40
1.2
L.3
1.9
1.8
1.2
1.5
1.8
1.4
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.5'
1.3
1.2
1.6
3.4
2.9
2.6
1.5
50
1.3
2.1
1.9
1.2
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
2.1
3.7
3.1
2.9
1.8
60
1.6
1.6
2.2
2.3
1.6
2.0
2.1
1.9
2.1
1.6
1.7
1.5
1.4
2.9
4.1
3.7
3.1
1.9
70
1.8
2.1
2.5
2.4
Z.I
2.1
2.5
2.0
2.7
2.2
2.4
III
1.9
1.5
3.2
4.5
4.4
3.7
2.2
80
..1
3.0
2.7
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.4
3.9
3.1
2.6
1.9
2.4
2.0
1.7
4.8
4.7
4.8
4.3
2.4
90
2.7
3.1
3.3
3.4
5.4
3.3
3.8
4.5
4.0
4.1
2.7
2.9
2.4
2.1
7.1
5.3
5.5
5.2
3.2
Max
4.2
5.3
5.6
5.6
7.3
7.5
6.1
6.1
9.1
6.4
6.7
6.3
3.1
4.2
3.0
3.3
11.8
6.3
11. B
11.9
5.1
Arlth
mean
1.6
1.1
2.5
2.2
2.2
1.9
2.2
2.3
2.0
2.3
1.7
1.8
1.5
3.2
1.6
3.4
1."
Quo
itean
1.4
1.6
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.8
1.6
1.9
1:1
i.2
3.2
2.6
2.5
1.6
Std
1.68
2.13
1.60
2.05
2.09
1.54
1.67
2.05
2.16
1.92
1.73
1.85
2.12
1.61
2.10
2.05
2.07
1.69
1.48
1.74
1.83
1.95
2.54
1.76
,2.16
2.26
1.78
•Data contributed by atata or local agency.
-------
Table 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
BPTHLEMEM
SITS 01
EPIE
SITE 01
LANCASTER
HTE 01
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 01
PjtTSBUOCH
SITE 01
RFADtNC
MTE 01
SWAMON
MTE 01
(lAHMINSTER
MTE 01
WFST CHESTER
SITE 01
YCMK
SITE 01
PUFRTC RKC
BAYAKOI"
SITE 01
CATAMO
SITE 01
SLAYANUIA
?ITE 01
PCNCE
MTE 01
BHCDE ISL'ND
EAST PROVIDENCE
•-ITE 01
PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
SOI TH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA
5ITE 01
fiScENVILLE
SITE 01
SOI.TH OAKCTA
SIOUX FSLLS
?ITF. 01
TEKWESSEE
Cl-ATTAf\OCGA
SITE "1
Year
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
66
67
66 67
No. of
samples
25
26
26
50
24
25
49
26
25
51
2S
50
23
25
23
26
26
26
25
51
24
25
23
48
26
24
50
26
23
47
23
26
49
26
26
23
22
45
Concentration. yg/m3
Mln
.4
.3
.3
.5
.2
.4
.4
.2
.1
.2
.1
.1
1.°
,4
.4
Frequency distribution ' percent! le
10
1.0
,7
.4
.9
.6
.a
.9
.3
.2
.2
.2
.4
1.3
1.0
1.1
20
1.3
.9
.7
1.5
.9
i.3
1.1
1.2
,5
.6
.2
.6
US
1.2
1.3
30
1.2
.8
1.8
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
.6
.3
.7
1.6
1.4
1.6
40
1.4
.9
1.9
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.4
.8
.5
.a
U7
1.7
1.7
50
L.4
1,0
2.0
1.7
i.e
1.7
1.8
.9
.7
1.1
1.9
2.1
2.1
60
1.9
l.l
2.2
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.0
1.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
70
2.2
1.3
2.4
2.2
2.0
2.1
1.4
1.3
1.3
2.3
2.4
2.3
80
2.4
1.6
2.S
2.6
3.2
2.8
1.7
1.8
1.4
2.6
3.0
2.6
90
2.5
2.2
3.5
3.4
3.9
2.1
1.9
111
2.4
1.7
2.8
3.2
3.2
Max
12.9
},'
4.2
7.5
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
2.6
2.4
2.4
3.5
5.9
5.9
Arith
mean
1.9
l.T
1.2
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
1.3
1.2
1.2
1."
1.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
Geo
•nean
2.9
1.4
l'°
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.0
.9
.9
.»
.9
1.9
1.8
1.9
SKS
tea
deV
2.29
i.ei
1,89
2.85
1.91
1.74
1.76
1.92
2.83
1.92
1.75
1.99
2.07
2.24
2.11
2.71
2.01
1.37
1.82
1.61
•Data contributed by stttt Of local agancy.
-------
Table 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
K'CXVILLE
MTF 01
CMPHI5
SITE "I
NASHVILLE
S1TR 01
TEVAS
C'LLAS
MTE 01
5ITF 01
MTE 01
SA., ANTOMc
MTE 01
UT-'.H
5ITE 01
S'uT L«E C7TV
SITE 01
VEC'WIT
Bl ^LIW-TCN
3ITF 01
SITE 01
HAMPTO"
MTE 01
ilTE 01
N.-9FCLK
SITE "1
MTE 01
RICHMOND
SITE 01
RrAMCKE
MTE Ol
sr-mLE
SITE 01
WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON
MTE 01
WISCONSIN
KF.-IOSHA
MTE 01
Year
67
46
47
66 67
46
47
66
66
67
66 47
67
66
67
66 67
66
66 67
66
66
47
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
46
67
66 67
46
67
64 67
67
No. Ol
samples
26
26
52
25
24
26
26
52
2*
25
21
50
24
25
49
25
23
26
26
26
25
51
26
26
25
26
26
52
22
26
4t
26
Concentration. ug/m3
Mln
B4
.6
.4
*5
•*
.7
.7
.7
.*
.9
.8
.3
.3
B4
.3
.3
.5
,6
.3
.2
.2
.3
Frequency distribution - percent! le
10
.6
.9
.9
la
.8
1.2
1.0
l.O
.9
1.2
1.1
.6
.5
1.0
.8
.7
.7
.7
.4
.5
.4
.7
20
1.2
l.l
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.6
l.O
1.4
1.2
.8
.9
1.1
1.1
.9
.7
1.1
.6
.9
.6
.8
30
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.1
1.4
1.6
.9
1.1
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
.6
1.0
.8
1.0
40
1.7
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.9
2.1
1.9
1.2
1.7
1.8
l.O
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.2
.7
1.1
1.0
1.0
50
1.8
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.9
2.4
2.1
1.3
1.8
2.0
l.O
1.4
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.3
1.4
.8
1.3
1.0
1.2
60
2.1
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.8
2.1
3.1
2.5
. 1.7
1.9
2.6
1.2
1.8
1.9
1.8
l.S
1.7
1.9
1.0
1.4
1.3
1.6
TO
2.4
1.9
2.3
2.7
<.o
2.5
3.6
3.1
1.9
2.1
3.3
1.5
1.9
2.3
2.0
<.o
1.8
2.2
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.9
30
2.5
2.8
2.6
2.8
2.5
2.9
4.8
*.6
2.3
2.3
4.7
2.0
2.3
2.4
2.*
<.l
1.9
2.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
2.1
90
2.7
3.1
3.0
3.1
3.0
6.6
7.2
6.6
3.2
2.7
5.3
2.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
<.8
2.2
3.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.7
Max
6.0
6.3
6.3
4.7
J.B
7.2
9.1
9.1
-.0
3.5
7.2
3.5
4.4
5.4
5.4
4.0
2 a
.0
2.5
3.6
2.8
4.8
4.8
5.6
Arlth
mean
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.0
1.8
2.6
3.2
2.9
1.7
1.9
2.7
U*
1.7
1.9
1.8
1.7
15
• t
1 4
ll?
1.1
1.5
1.3
1.6
Oeo
mean
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.6
2.2
2.6
2.4
1.5
1.8
2.2
1.2
1.4
1.7
1.6
1.5
i Q
1 . w
1.3
15
.V
1.2
1.0
1.3
Sttf
1.84
1.71
1.78
1.77
1 a i
1.81
1.72
1.78
2.00
1.89
1.72
1.40
1.88
1.76
1.86
1.67
1.77
1.77
1.98
1.62
1.67
1.93
1.98
1.96
1.82
76
•Data contributed by sat* or leal agency.
-------
Table 4-5 (continued). NITRATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
n.c»Tlci»
tal^O'-SIM
f-nso':
SITE 01
KtLkaUKEE
SiTF 01
hY^'-ilCG
CfSPFR
MTE 01
U-eYEWE
SITE 01
Year
67
66
67
66 67
"•7
66
67
66 67
No. of
samples
2*
26
2<
52
26
26
2s
SO
Concentration, jig/n>3
Mln
.<,
.1
Frequency distribution • percentlle
10
,5
.3
20
.8
.*
30
1.2
.5
40
1.5
.6
SO
1.7
.7
60
2.1
.7
70
2.6
.0
80
2.9
1.0
90
5.6
1.1
Max
6.5
1.6
Arlth
mean
2.2
.7
Geo
•nean
1,6
.&
Std
oeo
a*v
2.22
2.13
l.*S
1.67
1.76
•Data contributed by Mate or local agency.
-------
Table 4-6. NITRATES, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
AK I {UNA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
sue 01
ARKANSAS
»CKTGOVEPY CCUN'Y
MTE 01
CAlieCR-'tA
ht'^CL^T COUUTY
HTE 01
COLORADO
MESA VEROE NAT PK
SITE 01
DEL*WABE
KfrtT COUNTY
«ITE "I
IDAHO
Bl FTE COl.NTY
MTE 01
IH11AVA
W.'.RCE COUNTY
SITE 01
PaRKE CnilKlY
MTE 01
1C'-"
CFLAhARF CCUnTY
S1TF 01
MAINE
ACADIA NAT PK
SITE 01
CASYLAfn
C'LVEOT fCUNTY
SITE "1
Ml'SISMPP!
JACKSON COUNTY
SITf 01
MISSOURI
Si-AHNO'1 COUNTY
SITE PI
MONTANA
GLACIER NAT PK
SITE 01
NEn.<»SK»
Ti-SXAS CCU"TY
SITE 01
NEVADA
t^ITE PIf
.3
.5
4
• •*
^4
*4
^•v
.7
R
«8
B4
43
.4
,4
• 8
5
B7
1.0
i 0
I «u
.9
1.0
i 0
Is
.8
«8
a7
, 5
a
."
^7
.1
]l
.6
.4
.5
.3
.2
3
Geo
mean
.4
.4
4
.^
B4
P4
.2
.*
^3
B4
.3
, 4
B5
.6
.6
,3
.2
.3
.3
.7
4
« **
»S
• '
*B
.
::
.8
.*
.5
s
.•*
4
.^
4
• ^
.4
6
VB
• 5
.1
.1
.1
:J
.3
.2
^2
Std
r
290
• CO
2.40
2.34
2 TO
t . 1*9
2.19
2.49
2.47
2.48
2,48
1.68
2,00
l,B4
2,17
2,08
2.12
2,16
1.99
2.15
2.07
1.81
2,26
2.04
2.29
24O
.•»7
3.14
2.81
Zlft
.3U
2,57
2.44
2.56
2.63
2.60
2e*
.56
2.67
2.61
1.90
1.64
1.57
1.98
Z.H
2.06
2,06
2.02
2.04
78
•DM> contributed b» Hat* w I teal ip«q>.
-------
Table 4-6 (cunBnued). NITRATES, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
NE'.> HAMPSHIRE
CCOS cnufcTY
SITE 01
NE"« "EX1CO
RtO A9RI6A COUNTY
SITE 01
N£» YORK
JEFFERSON COUNTY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CAPE HATTERAS
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
ChtPOKEE COUNTY
SITE 01
ORE-SON
CLrfPY COUNTY
?ITE 01
PEM
-------
Table 4-7. SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ALABAMA
BIRMINGHAM
SITE 01
GADSOEN
SITE 01
HXNTSVILLE
SITE 01
HCBILE
SITE 01
MONTGOMERY
SITE 01
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 02
FAIRBANKS
SITE 01
ARIZONA
WABICOPA COUNTY
SITE 01
PHOENIX
SITE 02
TtCSON
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
LITTLE RCCK
SITE 01
I»EST MEMPHIS
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BUHBANK
SITE 02
GLENOALE
SITE 01
LCNG BEACH
SITE 01
LCS ANGELES
SITE 01
OAKLAND
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAN DIEGC
SITE 01
SAN FRANCISCO
SITE 01
Year
66
66
67
66
67
66
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. ol
samples
25
26
26
26
26
20
23
26
26
52
24
26
50
25
24
49
26
25
51
25
26
26
25
26
25
51
25
25
SO
Z5
25
24
49
26
25
51
Concentration, ug/m3
Mln
2.6
2.1
2.3
1.2
1.5
',2
1.6
.8
1.6
.5
.5
2.3
.6
.6
1.8
2.2
1.2
2.3
1.3
2.0
1.3
3.7
2.0
2.0
3.2
2.7
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.7
1.7
Frequency distribution • percentlle
10
5.3
2.9
3.2
1.2
2.2
.6
.a
2.3
.9
>.«
.a
1.2
3.4
1,6
2.0
2.2
3.1
2.0
5.2
I. a
2.6
2.2
4.0
!:?
3.7
3.5
2.8
2.9
2.4
2.2
2.3
20
5.6
4.2
3.6
».7
2.6
.8
1.3
2.5
1.4
2.2
1.2
1.5
4.2
1.9
2.4
3.7
3.2
2.7
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
3.8
4.1
1.6
3.8
3.1
3.8
2.6
2.4
2.5
30
6.7
5.0
4. a
'.9
2.8
1.0
1.7
3.2
1.6
3.1
1.5
1.8
4.6
2.1
4.0
4,5
3.8
».7
8.2
5.1
5.4
5.3
4.4
4.2
4.3
5.0
4.5
4.S
4.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
40
-'.2
».l
5.7
T3
1*7
• Of
1*06
1.39
ITfi
* TH
1.58
2.26
1.94
1.67
2.05
1-?
.87
1.50
U95
1.73
1.55
1.96
1.76
1.73
2.04
2.73
1.94
2.12
2.29
2.20
1.65
1.85
1.75
1.93
1.76
1.84
1.80
1.94
1.82
1.88
•DO* contributed by «ttti «e local «g*>qr.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE 01
SITE 02
CCIvN'ECTICUT
HARTFORD
SITE 01
NEv. HAVEN
SITE 01
DELAWARE
NEWARK
SITE 01
WILMINGTON
SITE 01
DC
•ASHINGTCN
SITE 01
SITE 02
GEORGIA
ATLANTA
SITE 01
HAlnAII
HONOLULU
SITE 01
JOAHO
BCISE
SITE 01
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO
SITE 01
SITE 02
EAST ST LOUIS
SITE 01
RCCKFORO
SITE 01
ILLINOIS
SPRINGFIELD
SITE 01
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
SITE 01
HAMMOND
SITE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
fcA A 7
OO o f
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
No. of
samples
25
26
51
124
26
26
52
25
26
51
25
26
51
24
21
45
25
26
51
135
23
26
49
2fc
&9
26
52
25
25
50
Z6
26
52
117
23
26
23
26
25
51
24
22
46
25
22
47
Concentration. jtg/m3
Mln
1.6
1.6
.0
3.9
*,2
4.4
4,4
6.1
1.9
3.9
7.5
5.5
5.5
7.1
1.7
1.7
'•.'•
2.8
3.3
2 a
• o
2,0
2.0
1.2
.5
5
2.8
2.8
2.8
1.8
3.0
2.6
1.7
6.6
8.0
6.6
5.5
5^1
5.1
5.*
1.7
1.7
Frequency djatrlbut on • percentile
10
2.0
2.2
.7
6.3
9.2
5.3
8."
6.8
5.2
*.8
7.9
9.9
9.0
7.7
>,9
7.1
8.3
3.5
».9
2.1
2.2
.8
1 0
5.0
4.0
5.0
5.*
6.8
2.9
*.3
a. 9
9.1
9.1
8.1
6.3
6.3
7.1
8.3
7.1
20
2.2
2.6
1.0
7.1
13.0
10. 1
10.5
8.0
5.8
6.5
10.7
10.8
10.7
8.1
7.1
7.9
9.8
*,2
5.9
1*0
l«0
7.3
5.6
6.3
0.3
8,9
4.5
».l
12.1
9.4
10.6
10.1
8.7
9.0
8.2
8.6
8.4
30
2.9
1.4
7.9
14.9
11.3
14.4
10.7
6.1
7.7
12.0
12.4
12.0
8.3
8.1
8.3
10.8
5.2
6.4
1.0
I y
*•••-
8.5
6.5
8.3
10.7
9.1
5.1
9.3
13.7
11.6
13.2
11.4
9.0
10.0
10.2
9.0
9.5
40
3.2
1.9
u. a
9.9
15.6
15.6
15.6
11.8
7.0
9.1
12.2
13.1
12.6
8.5
10.6
a. 9
12.3
6.7
6.7
3.1
1*0
10.3
11.2
10.9
13.1
9.7
5.9
6.1
15.3
13.4
13.9
12.0
9.9
11.1
10.5
9.9
10. 5
SO
3.3
i.2
10.7
13.2
12.2
17.6
17.2
17.6
13.2
8.1
10.7
13.6
14.8
14.7
9.8
10.7
10.3
14.4
7.4
7.1
1.1
11.1
12.2
11.8
15.9
10,8
7.0
6.5
16.0
13.9
15.4
13.4
10.6
12.0
13.8
12.3
12.9
60
3.5
3.0
13. 6
18.1
14.1
19.0
18.1
19.0
13.8
9.1
11.8
15.0
15.2
15.0
10.2
11.5
11.0
16.5
8.8
8.1
3.5
1*3
12.3
14.9
12.5
17.8
11.6
o.O
6.8
16.9
15.4
16.7
15.6
12.0
13.8
13.9
13.0
13.8
70
3.9
*.»
14.2
20.6
17.5
21.3
25.4
22.4
14. a
11.2
13.3
16.2
17.2
17.2
11.8
13.4
12.4
19.3
10.0
9.7
3.5
1.5
12.5
16.7
15.5
20.4
12.9
B.8
8.1
19.1
19.6
19.1
17.7
14.0
16.8
14.6
13.6
14.1
80
4.4
= .8
15.9
22.2
19.5
23.2
25.7
25.4
17,4
11.8
14.8
20.1
18.3
18.5
13.9
14.7
l*.l
23.0
10.6
U.*
11.4
1.6
16.5
18.1
18.0
23.7
13.6
9.6
8.9
24.1
21.*
21.8
2*. 2
16.8
19.6
15.*
15.6
15.6
90
5.2
0.0
19.5
24.8
24.2
29.4
28.0
28.0
21.3
17.7
18.0
23.4
19.1
23.2
16.0
16.4
16.0
31.9
11.5
14.2
1*.0
2.7
18.5
20.2
20.0
33.5
16.1
1*.4
11.2
26.6
23.4
26.4
30.7
19.6
28.1
25.5
16.9
24.7
Max
in. 8
10.8
26.4
31.9
31.5
31.9
33.4
33.8
33.8
41.9
20.9
41,9
30. a
28.1
30. a
26.1
24.9
26.1
57.0
24.5
14.5
24,5
13.2
A. 8
24.2
22.4
2*. 2
53.5
19.8
21.0
14.0
29.*
31.6
31.6
33.9
36.8
36. S
43.3
27.1
43.3
Arith
mean
4.1
3.7
3.9
12.4
t!.0
13.7
In. 6
17.7
U. 2
14.2
9?3
11.8
15.4
14.7
15.1
U. 0
11.1
U.I
17.2
a. i
8.3
8.2
1.'
11.5
12.4
12.0
17.5
11.2
8.0
7.0
17.0
15.8
16.*
16.5
12.7
14.6
14.7
12.2
1S.S
Geo
iiean
3.9
3.4
2.4
11.2
12,9
12.0
17.3
15.3
16.3
12,9
e.s
10,4
14.3
13.9
14.1
10,4
9.9
10.2
15.0
7.1
7l8
7.*
3.3
1.3
10.4
10.5
10.5
1*.3
10.4
&.9
6.*
15.8
1*.7
15.3
1*,6
U.4
12.9
U.9
". 0
11.9
Std
9«j
etev'
1.40
1.36
1.38
2,71
1.57
1.82
1.73
1.47
1.81
1.65
1.55
1*56
1.55
1.47
1.42
1.44
1.37
1.70
1.55
1.69
1.70
0*5
1*58
1.28
1.33
1.75
1.63
1.87
1.76
1.97
l.*9
1.73
1.56
1.48
1,47
1.48
1.66
1.59
1.63
1.66
1.70
1.68
•Dan contributed by MM* «local agney.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
KLNCIE
SITE 01
NEW ALBANY
SITE 02
SCUTH BEND
SITE 01
TERRE HAUTE
SITE 01
!OM
CEDAR RAPIDS
SITE 01
DAVENPORT
SITE 01
DFS MOINES
SITE 01
DUBUOUE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
TCPEKA
SITE 01
hICHITA
e f TB nl
alls vi
KENTUCKY
ASHLAND
SITE 01
COVtNSTON
SITE 01
LEXINGTON
SITE 01
LOUISVILLE
SITE 01
LOUISIANA
NEtl ORLEANS
SITE 02
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE
SITE 01
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON
SITE 01
LYNN
SITE 01
OUNCY
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 6T
66
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
AT
O f
AA
OO
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
* 66
* 66
* 66
No. of
samples
24
22
46
24
24
24
4B
22
yit
f-y
25
25
25
SO
5*
£o
25
51
23
ZA
£Q
— -
*5
25
50
24
25
25
$0
26
25
26
51
26
26
52
26
25
51
261
263
264
Concentration. fig/m3
Mln
4.2
Z.9
2.1
3.6
2.9
2.9
n
»u
1.3
1.1
1.1
Z.I
2.1
Z.3
. 9
.7
.7
4.9
Z.9
3.3
Z.9
.6
3.*
3.5
3.4
3.1
3.5
3.1
6.6
4.4
4.4
.7
.6
.6
Frequency distribution - percent! le
10
4.5
7.0
«.9
4.3
4.3
3.9
3.0
2>
3.1
3.7
2.8
I 1
*9L
J:i
1.6
5.6
4.4
4.5
4.5
3.6
6.8
5.5
6.3
3.5
4.1
3.6
10.0
5.4
8.7
1.5
1."
i.o
20
6.1
8.1
5.9
5.1
5.2
4.3
3.2
4.6
4.6
3.8
1 ^
*»3
1.6
2.0
6.5
5.6
5.0
5.6
».9
8.0
7.6
8.0
4.5
4.8
4.7
12.2
8.7
10.0
1.6
1.2
1.2
30
».4
12.2
6.9
5.7
6.7
4.9
4.5
5.3
S.3
4.7
1 •»
*»3
1.8
2.5
7.6
6.6
6.5
6.5
5.3
9.3
8.8
8.8
4.9
4.9
4.9
13.1
9.7
12.7
1.8
1.4
1.3
40
7.2
13.3
8.3
7.0
7.1
5.5
5.8
6.3
6.1
5.0
t f.
J>a)O
2.4
2.6
8.8
6.9
6.7
6.9
e.4
9.7
10.2
10.2
5.4
5.9
5.7
15.2
12.7
14.1
2.0
1.5
1.4
SO
7.7
13.9
9.8
7.1
8.3
6.1
6.2
7.2
6.7
5.2
2.8
3.1
10.5
8.3
7.3
7.6
7.8
13.2
10.5
11.2
6.0
6.2
6.1
15.6
14.7
15.4
2.2
1.7
1.5
50
8.7
16.5
12.3
8.4
9.8
6.7
6.7
8.2
7.5
5.8
3.0
3.9
15.5
10.8
7.6
8.3
8.8
14.8
11.6
12.8
6.7
7.6
7.3
16. a
15.4
16.6
2.4
1.8
1.6
TO
13.6
9.9
17.9
13.8
10.7
12.4
8.6
7.0
9.4
8.9
e.5
4.0
4.8
18.5
13.1
8.5
10.4
10.1
16.6
12.8
14.8
7.8
8.4
a.i
19.2
17.7
18.1
2.6
2.1
1.7
80
15.0
12.8
20.4
15.9
13.0
14.0
9.3
8.0
13.9
11.9
7.4
4.5
5.9
23.3
14.4
9.6
11.3
13.2
18.9
15.0
16.6
8.6
11.1
9.4
22.5
18.2
22.1
2.9
2.4
2.0
90
17.4
15.0
21.2
19.6
17.5
18.1
16.5
13.2
15.7
15.0
o.l
6.2
7.0
26.7
21.2
11.1
14.7
16.6
27.0
17.2
23.7
11.6
11.9
11.6
35.6
27.1
27.1
3.3
».l
2.4
Max
29.1
29.1
34.9
31.6
27.2
31.6
20.1
27.4
17.9
26.8
10. 0
16.5
16.5
61.3
22.4
24.6
24.6
18.5
29.3
31.2
31.2
13.9
17.5
17.5
76.1
39.2
76.1
10.0
7.0
3.9
Arltn
mean
10.5
9.2
14.8
11.7
9.3
10.5
7.7
7.3
8.6
8.2
9.6
3.6
4.0
16.1
10.4
8.1
9.3
8.6
14.0
11.8
12.9
6.7
7.5
7.1
19.5
15.7
17.6
2.4
1.9
1.6
Qeo
•nean
9.1
7.5
8.3
12.v
9.9
8.0
8.9
52
• t
6.7
5.9
4.2
5.0
7.4
7!0
5.2
21
*»•
2.9
3.4
12.4
9.0
7.4
8.1
7.2
12.4
10,1
U.4
6.2
°I«
6.5
16.9
13.5
15.1
2.2
1.7
1.5
std
geo
dev
1.70
1.43
1.57
1.78
1.80
1.73
1.76
1 &4
* . *>3
2.RO
* .3V
1,63
1.96
1.52
1.75
1,80
1.74
1.50
1 Rn
*»BO
1.93
1.79
2.02
1.74
l.SO
1.63
2.02
1.70
1.61
1.66
1.50
1.53
1.51
1.65
1.78
1.71
1.44
1.53
1.45
•Data contributed by ant* or local agancy.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES. URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
WICHIGA"!
DETROIT
SITE 01
FLINT
SITE 01
GRAND RAPIDS
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
DULUTH
SITE 01
MINNEAPOLIS
SITE 01
MCOHHEAD
ciTe ni
SITE u*
ST. PAUL
SITE OX
MISSISSIPPI
slACKSON
e f YF n I
3i 1 C "J *
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
ST. LOUIS
SITE 01
SITE 02
MONTANA
HELENA
SITE 01
NEBRASKA
OK.AHA
SITE 01
NEVADA
LAS VEGAS
SITE 01
RENO
SITE 01
NEh HAMPSHIRE
CONCORD
SITE 01
NEW JERSEY
BAVONNE
SITE 01
BURLINGTON COUNTY
SITE OZ
CAMDEN
SITE 01
6LASSBCRO
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
AA
OO
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
A7
ft f
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
No. or
samples
26
23
49
2$
25
26
26
26
52
26
JK
£9
26
51
it
*o
Z4
26
90
24
25
49
95
26
26
52
25
26
51
26
2*
*O
52
25
26
26
92
23
26
26
52
25
26
26
52
Concentration. ug/m3
Mln
5.2
1.3
1.3
2*7
u»
*.a
,e
1-a
• J
1Q
• 7
1.*
1.4
It
• 9
3.3
2.2
2.2
4.6
K«I *ff«*.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
PATERSON
SITE 01
PERTH AMBCY
SITE 01
TRENTON
SITE 01
NEh MEXICO
ALBUCUERCt'E
SITE 01
NE* YORK
AtBANY
SITE 01
BINGHAI'TCN
SITE 02
BLFFALO
SITE 01
ELMIRA
SITE 01
MASSENA
SITE 01
MT VERNON
SITE 01
NEW ROCHELLE
SITE 02
NEW YORK CITY
SITE 01
PCbGHKEEPSlE
SITE 01
ROCHESTER
SITE 01
SCHENECTAOY
SITE 01
SYRACUSE
SITE 01
TROY
SITE 01
SITE 02
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
67
it
oo
66
67
66 67
* 66
* 67
66 67
67
# 66
* 67
66 67
* 66
* 67
66 67
* 66
* 66
* 66
* 67
66 67
66
67
66 67
* 66
* 66
* 67
66 67
* 66
# 67
66 67
* 66
* 67
66 67
* 66
* 67
No. of
samples
23
25
48
25
25
50
25
25
2 1
*• 1
25
26
51
52
42
94
48
52
48
100
49
38
87
57
60
56
46
102
24
21
45
58
56
48
104
56
46
102
56
50
106
53
42
Concentration. ug/m3
Mln
6.1
6.3
6.1
6.8
4.2
4.2
5.2
3.0
,0
.0
1.1
4.1
1.1
2.8
5.3
1.4
I.*
1.9
2.8
1.9
.3
2.0
2.4
4.4
2.4
9.2
3.6
3.6
1.6
2.3
2.5
2.3
.6
3.3
,6
2.2
.0
.0
1.6
3.1
Frequency distribution - percent! te
10
10.0
8.5
9.6
7.5
7.1
7.2
10.1
9.2
.0
.3
5.0
4.9
*.9
4.0
8.0
<>'.0
3.8
3.9
3.9
2.6
o.O
6.»
6.8
6.8
9.6
10.1
9.6
5.3
5.3
4.0
*.5
5.7
4.8
5.0
4.5
4.4
4.5
5.3
•*.e
20
11. 1
12.6
12.2
8.4
9.6
8.6
12.1
11.7
.3
.9
5.7
6.4
6.0
».l
9.4
6.2
7.6
5.3
4, 1
4,2
».B
7.1
10,1
9,6
9.6
10.7
19.5
11.0
0.1
7.4
6.5
6.7
7.2
6.7
6.8
5.8
5.6
5.7
7.1
5.6
30
12.9
14.0
13.7
9.2
13.7
9.9
12.3
14.8
.6
1.1
8.0
7.2
7.9
5.9
11.6
7.4
9.2
5.8
4.5
5.5
»,7
0.1
11.3
10.8
11. 0
12.7
20.9
16.3
7.4
8.1
7.1
7.6
9.3
7.3
8.7
7.3
8.8
6.8
40
18.2
15.7
16,3
10.8
14.0
13.2
13.4
17.9
.8
1.2
9.5
8.9
9.2
6.4
13.3
8.8
10.8
7.4
5.2
5.8
S.4
10.8
12.2
11.3
11.6
13.3
23.3
19.5
11.2
9.7
8.1
8.7
9.8
9.0
9.7
9.1
6.9
7.6
10.3
7.7
SO
23.3
17,3
18.0
13,2
15.7
14.0
14.4
20.7
Ufi
• U
.9
1.8
10.9
10.4
10.6
6.9
15.0
10.3
12.3
8.3
5.7
7.0
6.3
12.3
13.9
12.7
13.2
16.9
29.3
23.1
12.3
10.4
9.4
10.0
11.2
10.6
10.9
9.6
7.3
9.0
11. 1
B.8
60
25.1
18.0
21.3
14.0
17.0
15.8
15.8
21.7
13.7
1.1
1.8
12.9
11.4
12.3
8.0
16.4
11.7
14.6
9.4
5.8
7.9
7.5
14.3
15.8
13.4
15.5
23.1
35.6
24.5
14.3
11.4
10.3
10.9
14.2
12.4
13.1
10.2
8.8
9.7
12.4
10.3
70
34.4
21.3
25.1
16.8
22.5
19.3
21.4
23.2
14.7
1.2
2.4
15.9
12.9
13.5
y.4
17.0
13.3
16.4
10.1
7.1
9.1
8.5
16.1
18.0
17.0
17.8
24.5
43.0
27.3
17.3
12.0
11.4
11.9
18.3
14.2
15.5
11.4
9.7
10,8
12.9
10.8
8P
36.9
24.8
34,4
19.9
23.2
22.5
21.7
24.1
18.2
1.3
3,0
17.2
16.1
16.8
11.0
21.3
16.6
18.5
11.7
8.0
10.2
9.0
19.1
22.5
23.9
23.0
26.6
51.9
32,4
19.5
14.0
12.8
13.2
20.8
16.9
18.9
12.6
13.3
13.0
15.2
13.6
90
42.9
36.4
38.1
24.1
26.7
24.4
30.3
33.9
25.8
1.8
3.6
24.6
20.9
23.8
12.5
26.6
20.5
25.3
15.7
11.0
12.0
13.0
21.1
25.5
28.8
28.1
27.3
54.1
51.9
23.7
15.9
16.0
15.9
24.7
22.1
22.4
14.1
14.7
14.5
20.3
16.4
Max
55.3
39.1
55.3
33.5
29.3
33.5
36.5
49.0
34.5
3.0
5.9
33.5
25.3
33.5
17.9
39.9
34.7
39.9
24.5
13.9
24.5
30.6
30.7
36.9
30,7
36.9
30.9
66.8
66.8
40.1
18.8
28.9
28.9
36.6
45.9
45.9
17.3
32.9
32.9
24.7
19.0
Arith
mean
24.1
19.*
21.8
14.7
16.7
17.5
20.9
14.2
.9
1.9
12.7
11.4
12.1
8.1
16.2
12.0
14.1
8.7
6.3
7.5
7.2
13.3
15.3
15.4
15.4
18.7
32.2
25.5
13.5
10.5
9.8
10.2
13.7
12.3
13.0
9.5
'•1
9.5
11.6
9.7
Geo
•nean
20.6
17.4
19.0
13.3
15.0
15.9
18.2
12.3
,7
1.3
10.4
10.1
10.2
7.4
14.6
10.1
12.1
7.6
5.9
6.7
5.9
11.5
13.4
13.6
13.5
17.2
26.5
21.4
H.*
9,6
8,8
9^2
11,4
10,5
10.9
8.7
7.8 !
8,2 |
10.4
8.8
Std
geo
dflv
i.al
1.61
1.71
1.57
1.67
1.57
1.78
1.75
2.57
2.08
1.99
1.66
1.83
1.55
1.58
1.85
1.72
1.70
1.45
1.59
2.04
1.77
1.77
1.66
1.71
1.52
2.06
1.80
1.88
1.60
1.64
1.62
1.98
1.76
1.87
1.58
2.22
1.92
1,69
1,58
84
•Dan contributed by rate or loot igancy.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
UTICA
SITE 01
NCBTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE
SITE 01
OHIO
AKRC^
SITE 01
CINCINNATI
SITE 01
SITE 03
CLEVELAND
SITE 01
CCIUPBUS
SITE 01
DAYTON
SITE 01
TOLEDO
SITE 01
YCLNGSTOhN
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA CITY
SITE 01
TILSA
SITE 01
OREGON
EtGENE
SITE 01
MEOFORO
SITE 01
PORTLAND
SITE 01
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLENTOHN
SITE 01
ALTOCNA
SITE 01
BETHLEHEM
SITE 01
Year
jfc £g
* 67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
A7
o r
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
6* 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
47
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
50
106
26
25
51
25
26
51
25
50
lie
26
26
52
25
7tt
*O
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
26
52
26
25
51
25
25
50
24
26
22
26
48
25
25
25
Concentration. pg/m3 •
Mln
2.9
2.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.4
2.3
2.3
5.5
4,9
2.3
4.1
4.0
4.5
3.5
3.5
2.6
2.6
5.6
4.1
4.1
2.0
1.6
1.6
1.9
1.4
1.4
1.1
.3
2.1
1.7
1.7
3.6
5.3
6.5
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
4|7
s|z
5.4
4.6
5.5
7,6
6.0
6,1
6.2
5.9
4.0
6.2
*.8
4.9
5.2
5.0
5.7
6 3
*U
6.3
'.6
2!l
2.1
2.2
2.1
L*
1.3
2.9
2.6
•!.6
r.9
6.8
20
5.7
6.2
6.7
5.9
6.2
8.3
8.2
8.3
7.3
7.2
S.4
7.3
7.1
5.5
6.2
5.7
6.7
8.6
7.5
7.5
3.0
2.1
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.5
1.6
1.7
3.4
3.7
3.6
9.3
7.2
8.2
30
6.5
6.6
7.0
6.3
6.8
10.2
11.8
10.5
8.4
7.5
0.3
8.5
8.2
6.5
7.0
6.9
8.3
8.9
8.7
8.9
3.0
3.0
3.3
2.6
2.7
1.9
1.9
3.6
«.&
U.I
8.0
9.9
40
6.8
7.7
8.1
7.2
7.5
10.5
13.2
12.7
9.3
9.1
7.9
8,8
8.7
7.6
B. 9
8.2
8.3
9.8
9.3
10.1
10.7
10.4
4.1
3.6
3.7
2.7
3.1
2.5
,.2
5.1
5.8
5.2
11.7
8.9
10.4
SO
in 1
LU * 1
7.6
9.0
8.5
8.5
8.5
13,2
13.7
13.7
U.5
9.9
9.0
U.7
10.4
10.5
8.3
9.4
8.9
8.5
10.3
9.8
10.7
11.9
11.2
4.3
4.1
4.1
3.0
3.4
2.8
*.2
5.2
6.9
5.8
13.5
10.6
12.9
60
in B
iv« 6
8.6
10.1
9.4
8.7
9.1
14.6
14.9
14.9
12.1
la.'o
10.3
12.7
11.5
12.7
12.2
9.7
11.9
10.1
10.9
10.7
10.8
12.9
14. »
13.0
5.1
4.6
4.5
3.2
4.3
3.1
2.8
6.0
6.8
6.5
14.7
11.1
13.4
70
11*6
10.1
11.5
10.0
10.2
10.2
15.2
15.5
15.4
16.0
13^5
12.2
14.4
13.2
13.2
13.7
90
.V
10.1
13.7
12.6
12.7
11.5
12.4
13.6
15.4
15.4
6.4
5.2
5.3
4.9
4.9
3.6
3.9
6.5
8.1
7.4
19.2
12.8
20.9
80
14.1
12.1
12.5
12.7
11.6
12.2
17.4
17.2
17.4
19.4
UC
* 7
15.7
14.9
15.2
14.2
14.7
10 fi
IV, O
12.8
15.3
14.7
13.0
13.9
13.2
19.0
16.2
16.9
6.6
6.4
5.8
S.6
5.8
4.2
4.4
9.9
8.3
B.«
21.2
14.1
27.4
90
16,2
14.6
16.1
17.7
14.0
14.9
25.6
22.0
23.4
25.8
15 0
21.8
21.3
19.8
16.3
17.0
23.8
13 1
21.3
18.5
18.5
15.5
17.8
16.7
23.6
19.6
21.0
7.8
7.6
8.6
8.8
8.6
6.7
5.1
14.5
9.9
U.5
23,4
17.0
34.1
Max
2 1 »9
22.9
22.9
24.6
16.0
24.6
33.9
26.9
33.9
58.9
71 R
C I • 0
58.9
34.9
26.4
36.4
36.4
24.6
22 8
27.5
27.9
27.9
38.0
22.4
38.0
28.1
35.7
35.7
9.3
16.9
10.4
13.5
13,5
7.9
6.5
16.7
15.9
16.7
64.1
21.9
56.5
Arith
mean
LO* 3
8.9
9.6
9.8
8,8
9.3
U.6
13.6
14.1
15.0
in 3
10*3
12.7
10.6
12.1
11.3
11.7
12.0
9 0
10.0
U.2
10.6
11. 0
10.8
10.9
12.9
13.1
13.0
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.4
4.6
3.2
2.9
6.7
6.5
6.6
16.7
11.1
18.1
G«o
•nean
9 5
8.1
8.8
9.0
8.2
8,6
13.1
12.0
12.5
12.4
9 • 6
10.9
8.V
11. 0
10.1
10.5
10.7
a 3
8.9
9.9
9.3
9.8
9.8
9.8
11.7
U.5
11.6
4.4
4.1
3>
3.9
2.8
,.5
S.6
5.7
5.6
14.2
10.3
14.7
Std
oeo
L .53
1.52
1.52
1.53
1.49
1,51
1.62
1.78
1.70
1.90
U64
1.81
1.56
1. 61
1.59
1.66
1.56
1.64
1.67
1.65
1.60
1.59
1.60
1.58
1.69
1.64
1.55
1.68
1.63
1.79
1.71
1.75
1.94
1.80
1.72
1.76
1.76
1.46
1.88
•DaU contributed by stall or local igncy.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ERIE
SITE 01
LANCASTER
SITE 01
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 01
SITE 02
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
READING
SITE 01
SCRAKTON
SITE 01
MRMINSTER
SITE 01
WEST CHESTER
SITE 01
YCRK
SITE 01
PUERTO RICC
lAyAHON
SITE 01
CATAMO
SITE 01
OLAYANILLA
SITE 01
PCNCE
SITE 01
RHCDE ISLAND
EAST PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
SOUTH CAROLINA
CCLUMBI*
SITE 01
GREENVILLE
SITE 01
SOUTH DAKOTA
SICUX FALLS
SITE 01
TENNESSEE
CHATTANOOGA
SITE 01
Year
47
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
67
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
66
67
66 67
No. of
samples
26
26
24
SO
24
25
49
150
26
25
51
25
25
50
23
25
23
48
26
26
26
25
51
24
25
23
48
26
Z4
50
26
Z4
23
47
23
26
49
26
26
23
22
45
Concentration, pg/m3
MID
'.I
4.0
4.6
4.0
7.9
7.2
7.2
2.*
4.1
5.2
4.1
2.6
1.9
1.9
5.8
3.3
5.0
3.3
2.6
4.6
1.9
3.4
1.9
3.1
1.2
.7
.7
1.2
.8
.8
2.2
4.0
4.4
4.0
2.2
1.1
2.3
1.3
4.0
1.7
1.7
Frequency distribution - percentlte
10
*.7
7.3
5.2
5.7
9.2
U.4
10.5
8.7
5.9
7.4
6.5
6.0
4.8
5.3
9.8
4.2
6.9
5.0
«.9
5.5
2.8
4.2
3.4
3.2
1.5
1.7
*.5
1.8
4.1
7.9
6.8
7.0
2.3
3.0
2.9
1.5
'•?
5,2
5.4
20
7.5
9.3
7.2
7.6
U.5
12.6
12.4
11.0
6.9
8.4
7.9
6.6
6.7
6.7
10.3
S.I
9.3
6.6
5.2
7.5
3.8
5.1
4.2
>.4
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.5
2.3
5.5
8.7
7.1
8.3
Z.8
3.4
4.6
*.l
6.9
5.5
6.2
30
8.9
10.4
9.0
9.5
14.6
14.2
14.2
12.3
8.1
9.8
9.5
8.2
11. 0
9.5
10. 8
6.6
10.5
9.3
6.1
8.6
4.1
6.6
5.3
i.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.6
5.6
9.7
8.7
9.7
3.9
4.4
5.7
'.3
7.2
6.4
6.8
40
10.1
11.6
10.5
11.2
17.4
15.0
16.2
15.0
9.6
10.8
10.8
9.8
11.3
U.2
14.7
8.1
11.7
10.5
7.9
v.3
6.9
7.9
7.7
3.7
1.9
2.2
1.9
2.8
6.6
10.6
12.4
11.1
6.0
5.2
6.4
2.5
7.5
6.7
7.3
SO
10.8
12.3
11.4
11.8
19.1
19.7
19.4
16.8
U.5
11.8
U.8
12.4
12.0
12.0
19.1
10.2
12.9
H.7
v.l
10. 1
9.8
9.6
9.8
4.7
2.0
2.6
2.0
3.2
a. 7
12.2
13.1
12.4
6.2
6.0
7.7
3.0
8.1
7.3
7.8
60
11.9
16.4
11.8
12.7
20.2
20.6
20.2
19.8
12.9
13.7
13.7
16.3
13.3
13.9
26.5
11.8
15.0
12.9
11.3
12.3
15.5
13.0
15.5
5.1
2.0
2.8
2.6
3.9
9.7
14.4
15.1
15.0
7.7
7.3
9.2
3.5
9.3
8.5
8.7
70
12.8
17.8
13.2
14.7
20.5
27.5
21.4
22.0
15.6
14.8
15.1
23.4
14.4
18.7
30.7
12.6
17.7
14.7
11.5
15.4
18,2
21.5
18.3
5.6
2.4
3.4
3.0
4.9
12.0
15.4
17.2
15.7
8.6
7.8
10.5
3.8
10.1
9.8
9.8
80
13.0
19.3
14.7
17.7
24.9
33.0
28.4
24.1
16.3
16.5
16.5
25.0
18.8
22.8
35.6
13.9
18.4
17.7
12.7
15.6
19.2
22.8
22.1
6.8
3.2
3.9
3.9
6.6
14.5
16.8
18.2
17.4
9.6
9?6
U.5
4.6
13.*
12.2
12.2
90
18.1
23.8
17.6
19.6
31.7
36.4
35.6
30.3
23.4
23.1
23.1
35.1
21.5
31.8
39.9
21.6
23.0
22.4
13.8
18.2
27.6
24.7
24.7
8.7
4.2
5.0
4.4
7.1
7.2
17.7
24.2
20.1
21.1
11.0
10.8
13.3
S.O
13.8
13.3
13.8
Max
19.8
25.7
38.5
38.5
44.4
46.6
46.6
73.3
24.3
28.1
21.1
51.1
48.6
51.1
67.6
25.7
37.3
37.3
21.8
32.2
38.6
37.6
38.6
10.7
4.4
12.9
12.9
0.4
8.8
23.6
34.2
21.1
34.2
20.8
IS.t
20.2
B.3
20.4
17.6
20.4
Arlth
mean
ll.o
14.2
12.2
13.2
19.4
21.7
20.6
19.0
12.7
13.4
13.1
17.5
14.7
16.1
23.9
ll.O
14.7
12.9
9.4
12.2
12.8
14.0
13.4
5.1
2.4
3.3
2.9
4.5
4.1
10.0
U.I
13.1
13.6
7.3
&:*
8.2
3.?
9.6
8.5
9.1
Qeo
•nean
10. 1
12.9
10.9
11.8
17,7
19.4
18.5
16.5
11.4
12.2
11.8
13.6
12,0
12.8
19.6
9.4
isli
11.1
8.5
10.8
9.0
ll.O
10.0
4.8
2.2
2^7
2.4
3.9
3.6
8.5
12.6
12.0
i2;3
6.0
s!a
7.2
2.9
8.9
7.6
8.2
Std
aeo
oev*
1.54
1,60
1.60
1.60
1.56
1.63
1.59
1.73
1.64
1*54
1.59
2.10
1.98
2.04
1.92
1.77
1.63
1.70
1.62
1.64
2.-46
2.07
2.27
1.45
1.48
l.BB
1.69
1.71
1.73
1.72
1.79
1.61
1.60
1.61
l.9l
l!?7
1.74
1.57
1.46
1.67
1.57
86
•Dan contributed by Mat* or local aoBney.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SULFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
KNOXVIUE
SITE 01
MEMPHIS
SITE 01
NASHVILLE
SITE 01
TEXAS
DALLAS
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAM ANTONIO
SITE 01
UTAH
OGDEN
SITE 01
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
VERMONT
BURLINGTON
SITE 01
VIRGINIA
DANVILLE
e|VC 01
at 1 c w*
HAMPTON
SITE 01
LYNCH8URG
SITE 01
NORFOLK
SITE 01
PORTSMOUTH
SITE 01
RICHMOND
SITE 01
ROANOKE
SITE 01
WASHINGTON
SEATTLE
SITE 01
WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
KENOSHA
SITE 01
Year
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
67
66
67
66 67
67
AT
O I
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
No. 01
samples
24
26
26
52
24
Z5
49
26
26
52
24
25
25
50
24
24
25
49
25
23
26
26
26
25
51
26
26
25
26
2*
*6
52
22
26
48
26
Mln
2.3
1.4
l.»
5.2
3.1
3.1
'1.8
1.7
'.2
2.0
.8
• 8
1.8
1.7
1.7
4.3
3 1
3. *
2.9
-.3
3*8
4.5
3.8
2.9
3.6
3.8
2.7
2.8
4.9
2.8
2.2
Concentration. jig/m3
Frequency distribution - percent lie
10
3.9
2.3
2.7
6.4
*.8
5.5
2.5
2.9
2.6
2.3
1.8
2.0
2.9
1.7
1.9
5.0
4 7
J.9
5.4
6.4
5.6
•..8
5.0
?'f
3.6
7.2
«.7
6.7
3.2
20
4.0
2.9
3.7
6.6
6.2
6.4
3.4
3.6
3.4
2.7
2.3
2.6
3.5
2.0
2.2
S.8
*.2
5.8
6.5
6.7
6.4
5.9
5.0
4.2
8.9
9.0
9.0
4.4
30
4.4
3.6
4.0
8.3
6.6
6.6
*.9
4.2
4.2
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.6
2.0
2.6
6.9
9.4
6.8
7.5
7.5
6.8
7.4
5.3
5.0
9.8
9.4
9.8
4.7
40
5.2
3.9
4.7
9.5
6.8
7.3
5.6
4.9
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
4.4
2.4
3.3
7.2
7.0
7.9
9.2
8.8
7.9
7.8
5.7
5.3
11.1
11.5
11.5
5.6
50
6.0
*.7
5.3
9.8
7.1
9.5
6.2
5.5
5.6
3.4
I'J
5.1
2.6
3.6
8.0
7.4
8.3
10.3
10.1
9.1
8.8
5.8
5.5
18.1
12.0
17.1
6.1
60
6.7
6.0
6.5
12.0
8.7
10. 5
9.4
6.6
7.0
3.6
4.1
5.9
2.9
4.5
9.3
8.4
8.5
10.3
11. o
11.0
10.2
9.4
6.2
5.9
27.7
20.5
21.3
6.7
70
9.3
7.2
7.4
14.9
11.4
12.8
12.3
9.4
7.4
4.1
4.9
6.0
4.2
5.7
12.1
8.8
U.2
12.2
1U8
12.2
13.0
9.8
6.3
6.3
41.2
39.8
39.8
7.4
80
9.8
7.7
8.9
19.9
12.8
16.6
14,1
U^3
8.0
4.4
5.8
7.5
4.5
6.0
15.0
9.8
15.8
12,4
14.7
12.5
13.7
11.4
7.7
7.3
52.6
41.5
43.0
7.9
90
U.5
8.9
10.7
21.1
16.6
20.1
18.1
16.0
15.0
5.8
9.6
16.4
6.9
9.5
16.8
13.1
21.1
14.4
19.2
15.3
16.1
15.4
10.2
9.4
60.3
53.2
60.3
12.4
Uax
24.2
16.9
24.2
26.2
20.1
26.2
25.2
25.2
18.0
10.3
16.9
27.8
9.5
27.8
21.6
14.7
24.1
25.6
22.3
25.6
20.7
17.8
11.7
12.1
70.1
196.7
196.7
14.2
Arilh
mean
7.6
5.6
6.6
12.4
9.2
10.8
8.9
7.6
6.8
3.9
4.7
6.9
3.6
S.3
10.1
7.7
10.7
10.0
11.2
10.6
10.1
9.3
6.5
6.0
27.Z
26.2
26.7
6.6
G«o
•neon
7.8
6.6
4.8
5.6
U.I
8.4
9.6
7.0
6.1
5.7
3.6
3.8
5.5
3.1
O
9.0
7.5
'.0
9.5
9.1
10.2
9.7
9.2
8.6
6.2
5.6
19.0
17,9
18.4
5.9
Std
«~
00V
1.38
1.72
1.77
1.75
1.62
1.57
1.60
1.42
1.76
2.08
1.92
1.79
1.44
1.90
1 (.a
i.OC
1.90
1.69
1.80
1.61
1.50
1.59
1.65
1.53
1.52
1.53
1.60
1 44
*.*3
1.49
1.36
1.40
2.53
2.37
2.45
1.61
•Data conrtbulad by attt. or local ajancy.
-------
Table 4-7 (continued). SUIFATES, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
MADISON
SITE 01
MILWAUKEE
SITE 01
WYOMING
CASPER
SITE 01
ChEYENNE
SITE 01
Vear
67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
No. of
samples
26
26
26
52
26
26
50
Concentration, ;ig/m3
Mln
2.0
3.2
3.1
3.1
1.4
1.1
.5
Frequency distribution • percentlle
10
2,6
4.1
3.9
4.1
'.5
1.3
.8
20
3.2
5.6
4.7
4.8
1.8
1.4
1.0
30
6.1
4.8
5.5
2.1
1.4
1.3
40
6.6
5.5
6.4
2.4
1.7
1.4
50
7.2
7.3
7.2
2.5
2.0
1.5
«o
8.1
8.5
8.4
<«8
2.3
1.8
70
8.7
9.9
9.3
s.2
2.5
2.1
80
11.1
10.6
10.6
3.4
2.8
2.4
90
22.9
15.8
16.1
4.6
3.3
2.8
Max
36.5
22.6
36.5
6.3
3.7
2.9
3.7
Arlth
mean
10.1
8.3
9.2
t. 8
2.1
1.4
1.8
Geo
nean
4.6
8.2
7.3
7.7
2.6
2.0
1.2
1.6
Sid
K
1,55
1.81
1.65
1.73
1.46
1.44
1.62
1.53
•Dab contributed by mi* or local agency.
-------
Table 4-8. SULFATES, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITt 01
ARKANSAS
MCNTGn"ERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HgMBCLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITC 01
DELAWARE
KENT COUNTY
SITE 01
IDAHO
BLTTE COUNTY
SITE 01
INDIANA
MCNRCE COL-NTY
SITE 01
PARKE COUNTY
e f TP Ql
5 I ( c Ui
tCKA
DELAWARE COUNTY
SITE 01
MAINE
ACAOIA NAT PK
SITt 01
MARYLAND
CALVERT COUNTY
SITE 01
MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON COUNTY
SITE 01
MISSOURI
SHANNON COUNTY
SITE 01
HUN TAN A
GLACIER NAT PK
SITE 01
NEBRASKA
THOMAS COUNTY
SITE 01
NEVADA
ViHITE PINt COUNTY
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
No. of
samples
25
Z5
50
25
Z5
50
24
25
49
25
24
49
25
25
50
25
22
24
46
25
Zl
46
23
24
20
44
26
51
26
Z5
51
24
24
48
24
25
49
26
25
51
22
23
45
Concantrat on, jjg/n>3
Mlii
.5
.0
1.4
.8
.8
,1
.9
.9
.7
4.\
3.6
3.6
.7
2!o
1.9
1.2
2.4
1.0
1.0
2e
.3
.6
.6
1.1
1.1
1.5
.9
.9
,7
.3
1.0
.3
.3
.9
.0
T°
Frequency distribution - percentfle
10
1.0
.3
1.9
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.3
.8
4.4
5.0
4.4
2 4
2! 7
2.4
1.4
2.9
2.3
2.7
3.6
4.4
2.4
2.4
2.2
1.5
2fl
.v
1.0
.6
1.2
.5
.7
.9
.2
,2
20
1.0
.6
2.5
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.6
l.l
4.7
6.1
5.5
4.6
4.0
2 8
3^2
3.1
2.0
3.1
2.8
3.0
5.6
5.3
3.2
3.3
3.4
2.0
1.0
.9
1.7
.7
1.0
1.2
.2
•4
30
1.7
.8
3.0
2.4
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.3
3.8
'.8
6.9
4.6
3.9
3.8
1.3
3.8
3.4
3.6
6.1
5.6
3.2
3.5
3.7
2.9
1.2
.9
1.8
.9
1.2
1.3
.2
.5
40
1.8
3.1
2.9
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.5
7.3
a.i
7.8
5.0
4.1
4.1
1.4
4.2
3.6
4.2
7.2
6.1
4.1
3.9
3.9
3.4
1.2
1.2
1.9
1.0
1.6
1.4
.5
.7
50
2.2
1.1
3.4
3.6
2.0
2.1
2.1
1.8
8.6
10.4
8.6
5.7
4.8
5.1
'.9
4.4
4.4
4.4
7.4
7.4
4.5
4.0
4.4
4.2
1.3
1.2
2.0
1.0
i.a
1.4
.5
•»
60
2.7
1.7
3.8
3.9
2.2
2.3
2.3
1.9
9.6
12.2
10. a
5.9
5.1
5.7
i.9
4.9
5.1
5.1
8.6
a. 4
5.4
5.5
4.6
5.4
1.4
1.3
2.2
1.3
1.9
1.6
.5
1.2
70
a. 4
2.0
4.6
4.4
2.5
3.2
2.9
2.2
11,8
13.6
13.1
7.8
7.0
7.8
5.4
6.8
3.7
5.5
6.3
6.0
9^7
9.7
6.1
6.8
5.2
5.9
U*
1.5
2.3
1.7
2.2
1.6
.5
1.4
80
4.5
3.1
5.0
4.5
3.2
3.4
3.4
2.4
13.1
14.6
14.6
9.6
8.1
8.1
8.7
6.5
7.7
4.0
6.3
6.5
6.5
10 8
13^5
11.3
6.7
7.5
6.0
6.6
1.7
1.8
2.4
2.1
2.3
1.8
.9
1.6
90
4.8
4.5
6.1
6.5
4.0
3.7
3.7
2.5
19.4
17.9
17.9
11.7
9.8
111*
12.2
7.0
9.3
8.6
9.3
12 8
14.6
9.4
9.6
6.2
8.2
1.9
2.0
2.7
2.6
2.6
1.9
1.0
1.8
Max
6.7
6.7
6.7
8.7
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.4
24.7
22.0
24.7
25.3
51.2
12.8
51.2
13.2
14.0
28.4
28.4
ift ^
2U4
21.4
13.7
10.6
14.1
14.9
2.2
5.3
5.5
5.1
5.5
6.9
1.5
6.9
Arilh
mean
'•>
1.9
3.8
3.6
2.3
2.4
2.4
1.9
10.1
10.9
10.5
6.8
6.5
7.9
5.5
6.7
3.5
5.4
6.2
5.8
8 0
8^9
8.5
5.3
S.3
*.?
*.9
1.*
1.*
2.1
1.5
1.8
1.7
.5
1,1
Geo
•nean
*.2
1.3
3.5
3.0
2.1
2.2
2.2
1.7
8.8
9.8
9.3
5.7
5,7
4.8
5.2
2.9
4.8
4.7
4.8
7 3
7l4
7.4
4.6
4.6
4.2
3.9
4 1
^. •
1.3
1\
* I
1.2
2.0
1.2
1.5
1.5
.*
.ti
Sid
dev
1.98
2.14
1.50
1.89
1.70
1.55
1.53
1.54
1.58
2.16
1.89
1.73
1.64
1.69
1.36
1.73
Zi n
. 10
1.66
1.89
1.74
1.57
2.02
1.81
1.55
2.03
1.80
1.73
1.76
1.58
2.01
1.80
1.30
1.82
1.59
1.41
Z.03
1.74
1,52
2.10
•Data contributed by
-------
Table 4-8 (continued). SULFATES, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Nbl» HAMPbHIHE
CCCS COUNTY
SITE 01
NEW MEXICO
RIO ARRIBA COUNTY
SITE 01
NEk YORK
JEFFERSON CCUNTY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
CAPE HATTEKAS
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
CHEROKEE COUNTY
SITE 01
OREGON
CURRY COtNTy
SITE 01
PENNSYLVANIA
CLARIOM CCUNTY
SITE 01
RHCDE ISLAND
WASHINGTON COUNTY
SITE 01
SOUTH CAROLINA
RICHLAHD COUNTY
SITE 01
SOUTH DAKOTA
BLACK HILLS NAT FOR
SITE 01
TEXAS
NATAGORDA COUNTY
SITE 01
VERMONT
ORANGE COUNTY
SITE 01
VIRGINIA
SHENANOOAH NAT PK
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
DCOR COUNTY
SITE 01
WYOMING
YELLOWSTONE PARK
SITE 01
Year
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
66
67
66 67
67
66
67
66 67
No. ol
samples
26
26
S2
24
23
47
26
26
52
23
23
46
26
25
51
24
25
49
24
Z4
48
23
24
47
26
25
51
25
25
50
23
25
48
26
25
51
25
26
51
20
25
26
51
Concentration, jig/m3
Mtn
l.fl
1.6
3
1.9
1.4
1.6
1.4
.7
1.4
.7
.7
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.9
2.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.3
.3
.3
2.0
.7
.7
1.2
1.2
2.0
1.6
.9
.7
.3
.3
Frequency distribution - percent! l«
10
1*6
1:1
1.2
1.8
1.7
.9
3.6
3.6
4.0
4.3
4.0
3.0
2.2
2.2
1.5
.5
.8
2.3
1.9
2.0
2.6
3.Z
2.4
2.4
1.2
.9
.5
.5
20
3.1
1.6
a. 9
4.7
3.9
2.7
2.1
1.4
3.8
3.8
5.0
4.5
3.3
2.2
3.0
1.7
.8
2.5
2.0
2.4
3.8
3.9
3.4
3.4
1.7
1.5
.5
.8
3>
2.9
*.9
4.3
2.8
2.8
1.8
5.1
5.1
5.3
5.1
3.8
3.2
3.3
1.8
1.1
2.6
2.5
2.6
4.0
4.5
3.7
4.0
1.8
1.5
.6
1.0
40
5.2
5.8
5.3
2.1
5.6
5.8
6.8
6.0
4.2
3.3
3.8
1.9
1.2
1:1
2.9
4.6
5.0
4.6
4.5
2.2
1.7
.8
1.1
SO
6.0
6.4
6.3
2l7
6.0
6.4
7.0
6.8
4.8
4.Z
2.2
1.3
3.1
3.3
3.2
4.9
5.7
5.2
5.1
2.9
1.7
1.0
1.5
60
6.8
7.5
7.5
2.8
7.4
8.9
8.8
8.6
5.2
5.0
2.4
1.4
3.5
3.4
3.5
5.4
6.1
5.7
5.7
3.3
2.0
1.0
1.6
70
7.7
8.7
8.6
3.2
8.7
9.9
11.0
9.5
5.8
5.5
2.5
1.5
3.8
5.2
4.0
6.0
8.3
6.6
6.7
3.9
2.1
1.1
1.7
80
10.3
12.0
9.0
>:»
9.9
11.8
14.6
11.7
5.8
5.8
2.5
2.0
4.1
7.3
5.2
9.2
10.2
8.0
8.0
8.5
2.2
1.4
2.0
90
1U I
17.9
12.3
5.1
4.7
13.3
16.6
18.4
16.2
7.9
6.8
2.9
2.6
4.2
8.7
7.9
11.3
12.5
9.4
9.8
7.0
2.7
1.7
2.2
Max
30.5
28.9
12.9
10.1
4.8
22.5
26.3
27.4
27.4
19.5
19.5
3.2
2.8
10.5
12.2
12.2
12.5
30.6
12.5
16.7
13.5
3.1
1.9
3.1
Arlth
mean
5.9
7.3
«.*
6.6
3.6
2.6
7.5
8.6
10.1
8.9
5.4
4.1
*.8
2.2
1.4
3.6
4.4
4.0
5.9
7.1
5.7
6.0
4.0
1.8
1.0
1.4
Geo
•nean
4.9
4.9
5.4
5.2
*.7
sis
3.2
2.3
6.6
8.0
7.3
6.6
8.5
7.5
4.8
3.8
4.2
!l2
3.3
3.6
3.5
5.2
5.9
5.1
5.1
5.1
3.1
1.7
.9
1.2
Sid
oft
1.86
1.87
1.34
2.17
2.09
2.00
1.74
1.60
1.71
1.67
1.90
1.79
1.71
1.79
1.75
1.60
1.55
1.58
1.28
1.76
1.47
1.92
1.71
1.75
1.82
1.63
1.86
1.75
2.06
1.45
1.64
1.55
90
•Data contributed by state at local agency.
-------
SECTION 5.
URBAN AND NONURBAN METALS
-------
Table 5-1. ANTIMONY, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
8URBANK
SITE 01
LONG BEACH
SITE 01
LOS ANGELES
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
NEW JERSEY
ELIZABETH
SITE 01
GLASSBORO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
Year
63
60
65
60
60
63
62
58
63
62
63
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
25
25
25
26
24
23
24
25
25
25
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
ug/m3
Station location
NEW YORK
GLEN COVE
SITE 01
MASSENA
SITE 01
NEW ROCHELLE
SITE 01
TROY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE
SITE 01
OREGON
MEDFORD
SITE 01
TEXAS
FORT WORTH
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
Year
60
60
60
60
62
61
62
63
65
SUM
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
21
24
26
21
25
22
25
22
25
47
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
0
!.'2/
COfiC-
-q/n-.-
.064
.050
.049
.050
-------
Table 5-2. ANTIMONY, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
Year
63
63
63
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
26
24
22
25
Above
detect
quart.
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone.,
ug/afl
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOQUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. of samples
Col lee
ted
24
26
26
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
1
Max.
cone..
.058
94
-------
Table 5-3. BERYLLIUM 1966 URBAN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES3
(pg/m3)
ALABAMA
Bi rmingham
Mobile
ILLINOIS
Chicago
INDIANA
East Chicago
Indianapol is
KENTUCKY
Ashland
Covington
Louisvi 1 le
MARYLAND
Baltimore
MICHIGAN
Detroit
NEW JERSEY
Perth Amboy
OHIO
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Dayton
Youngs town
PENNSYLVANIA
Pittsburgh
Read i ng
Warminster
VIRGINIA
Danv? He
WEST VIRGINIA
Charleston
WISCONSIN
Mi Iwaukee
1st
quarter
0.0002
0.0000
0.0003
0.0003
0.0000
0.0005
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
0.0000
0.0004
0.0003
0.0002
0.0004
0.0000
2nd
quarter
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000
0.0002
0.0003
0.0002
0.0002
0.0004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0004
0.0000
3rd
quarter
0.0000
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0004
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0002
0.0003
0.0000
0.0002
0.0000
0.0009
0.0002
0.0005
0.0000
0.0000
0.0006
0.0003
4th
quarter
0.0004
0.0000
0.0002
0.000?
0.0005
0.0002
0.0000
0.0003
0.0005
0.0000
0.0004
0.0002
0.0000
0.0002
0.0002
0.0000
0.0016
0.0000
0.0000
0.0007
0.0000
Year's
average
0.0002
0.0001
0.0002
0.0004
0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
0.0001
0.0003
0.0001
0.0002
0.0001
0.0002
0.0002
0.0004
0.0001
0.0006
0.0001
0.0001
0.0005
0.0001
aSamples from all NASN monitoring sites were analyzed. The above table
presents data only from those sites at which non-zero concentrations
were detected.
95
-------
Table 5~k. BERYLLIUM 1966 NONURBAN QUARTERLY COMPOS ITES^
(yg/m3)
DELAWARE
Kent County
INDIANA
Monroe County
Parke County
MARYLAND
Calvert County
MISSISSIPPI
Jackson County
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Coos County
NEW YORK
Jefferson County
VIRGINIA
Shenandoah Nat Pk
1st
quarter
0.00010
0.00000
0.00010
0.0000?
0.00009
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
2nd
quarter
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00001
3rd
quarter
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00010
0.00009
0.00000
kth
quarter
0.00013
0.00009
0.00019
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
Year's
average
0.00006
0.00002
0.00007
0.00002
0.00002
0.00003
0.00002
0.00000
Samples from all NASN monitoring sites were analyzed. The above table
presents data only from those sites at which non-zero concentrations
were detected.
96
-------
Table 5-5. BISMUTH, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BURBANK
SITE 01
LONG BEACH
SITE 01
LOS ANGELES
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
NEW JERSEY
ELIZABETH
SITE 01
GLASSBORO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
Year
63
60
65
60
60
63
62
58
63
62
65
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
25
25
25
26
24
23
24
25
24
25
Above
detect
quan.
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
2
Max.
cone.,
ug/nfl
.002
.003
.002
.002
Station location
NEW YORK
GLEN COVE
SITE 01
MASSENA
SITE 01
NEW ROCHELLE
SITE 01
TROY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE
SITE 01
OREGON
MEDFORD
SITE 01
TEXAS
FORT WORTH
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
Year
60
60
60
60
62
61
62
63
65
SUM
63
No. of samples
Collcc
led
21
24
25
21
24
22
25
22
25
47
26
Above
detect.
quan.
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
ug/m3
.001
.001
.001
97
-------
Table 5-6. BISMUTH, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREWJENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
station location
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLOT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLOR/SOU
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
Year
63
63
63
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
22
25
Above
detect
quan.
2
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
.001
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOQUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. of samples
Col lee
led
24
26
26
26
Above
delect.
quan.
0
0
2
0
Max.
cone..
.003
98
-------
Table 5-7. CADMIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ALASKA
SIT? 01
CALIF^" IS
8U "»3A N<
SITE 01
UCNG REACH
SITF 01
LCS VIC-ELE.S
SITE 01
PASAfJC iA
SITE 01
SAM JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
MITOES1TA
ST. DAUL
SITE 01
MISSCUPI
KAHSAS CTTY
5IT£ 01
NEk JE9SFY
SIT? "Ol
SLASSIIRC
SITE 11
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
IMEIt YO'K
SLEv COVE
SITS 01
NASSi-'l/.
SITE 01
SIT; oi
NEk
f ROY
SIT* 01
ASHEvtLLE
SITE "I
MEOFCSl)
SITC 01
TEXAS
FT 'jn"TM
SITE 01
HCuSTO"
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT L6K£ CITY
SITE 01
Year
53
60
65
60
60
63
62
59
"•*
62
65
63
61
63
60
60
62
61
62
63
65
63 65
63
No. of
samples
26
26
25
2i
25
26
24
23
24
25
24
25
21
24
25,
21
3,
zz
25
22
25
47
26
Concentration, ug/m3
Mln
.0.)
.'"IJ
.vlO
. .10
.100
.'10
.000
."10
...30
.'30
.-30
•-10
."10
.'•••).>
. '10
•""°
.'1C'
...-0
..,.,
.'.'10
."10
• coo
.'10
Frequency distribution ' percentlle
10
.010
.ono
.000
,0"0
.000
.100
.000
.no
.010
.000
.101
.010
.010
,coo
.110
.010
.001
.010
.110
looo
.000
.000
20
.000
.000
.000
.000
.010
.000
.010
.010
.000
.000
.310
.JOO
.000
.000
.000
.010
.000
.000
.000
looo
.000
.000
30
.000
.000
,000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.010
,000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.0,0
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
40
.000
.000
.000
.000
.009
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
,000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
so
.010
.000
.010
.019
.010
.000
.000
.000
.010
.000
.010
.000
.010
.010
.010
.000
.010
.000
.010
,000
.100
.000
.000
60
,30:1
.000
.001
.011
.010
.010
.001
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.001
.000
.Oil
.001
.000
.000
.000
,000
.300
.000
.000
70
.000
.000
,1)11
.012
.011
.000
.000
.000
.000
.100
.000
.011
.001
.010
.013
.00"
.000
.00"
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
80
.000
.011
.000
.015
.011
.000
.000
.000
,000
.010
.007
.011
,009
.000
.016
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
90
.000
.017
.000
.020
.015
.000
.010
.009
.000
.025
.011
.019
.019
.010
.040
.009
."00
.010
.014
.000
.000
.000
.000
Max
.001
.031
.026
.329
.018
.012
.017
.011
.009
.028
.037
.051
.026
.000
.160
.022
.013
.313
.066
.000
.000
.000
.013
Arlin
mean
.000
.004
.002
,009
.008
.000
.002
.001
.000
.oos
.004
.007
.004
.000
.017
.002
.001
.001
.005
.000
.000
.000
.001
Geo
•nean
.000
.002
.001
.005
.005
.001
.002
.001
.001
.002
.002
.003
.002
.000
.005
.001
.001
.001
.002
.000
.000
.000
.001
sw
6ev
1.00
3.42
2.38
3.77
3.36
1.63
2.5B
2. IB
1.57
3.84
3.15
4.09
3.37
1.00
5.12
2.48
1.67
2.08
3.33
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.65
•Data contributed by sate Of local agency.
-------
Table 5-8. CADMIUM, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
KUMBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
Year
63
63
63
63
No. ol samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
22
25
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
ug/mS
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOQUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. of samples
Col lee
ted
24
26
26
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
1
Max.
.043
100
-------
Table 5-9. CHROMIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ALASKA
«ITF Cl
CALIF-.O- IS
Bl.H'lA""'
SIT" 31
LCiK, 1FACH
MT£ 01
LCS i-ISFuES
SITr 01
BMT"'?I
SAN jn'F
SIT', 11
K«HSS--. CtTY
ST. rA'.'L
S1TC 01
MISSO'^I
KAJ.S1S CITY
SITE 01
r»E> Jr'JSFv
SIT" 01
SIT' 01
JFriSSY CITY
SiTS 01
NE' Y '•>'•
6Ltv O"VF
3CTF "1
MASSE'"-
SITC 01
SIT? 1]
T°OY
NORTH OTLI'V'A
ASHEVILI.*
SITE 01
OREGI-M
SITS Ol
TEXAS
FT VCPTH
SITE oi
HCl/STTI
SIT? Ol
UTAH
SALT I."F CITV
SIT- 01
Vear
63
60
S5
60
V,
63
«
5*
63
62
65
A3
60
60
60
»0
62
61
62
63
63 65
63
No. of
samples
Zf
2t
25
25
?5
26
2''
23
24
25
24
25
21
24
25
21
25
22
25
22
25
47
26
Concentration, tig/trfl
Min
."00
..,-.
... 10
.-'•o
. 13
...'00
.000
.C-1U
.,10
.-fiC
, .- 10
..,1U
.'.•>J
.l.1»
..«,
..-10
.'-10
.^22
.' OU
.CIO
Frequency distrlbut on - percentlle
10
.000
.014
.110
."14
.110
,foo
.010
.005
.000
.000
.110
.010
.0(10
.010
.-"5
.110
.100
.031
.100
.000
.no
.coo
.000
20
.000
.015
.000
.017
.012
.000
.000
.006
.000
.300
.000
.000
.005
,004
.005
.005
.000
.034
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
30
.000
.015
.000
.023
.016
.000
.000
.007
.000
.000
.000
,000
.006
.005
.006
.006
.000
.037
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
40
.000
.019
.000
.028
.020
.000
.000
.008
.000
.000
.000
.000
.007
.007
.008
.008
.000
.041
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
50
,000
.020
,010
.031
.025
,000
,000
.008
.000
.000
.000
.008
.008
.008
.012
.011
.000
.044
.000
.000
.000
.000
.coo
60
.000
.024
.000
.033
.025
.000
.005
.009
.000
.000
.301
.009
.009
.010
.021
.012
,00i
.048
.000
,000
.000
.000
.aoo
70
.000
.040
.ono
.037
.027
.000
.005
.Oil
.ono
.007
.004
.016
.010
.011
.034
.015
.000
.052
.005
.000
.000
.000
.000
80
.000
.043
.000
.039
.039
.006
.011
.011
.000
.007
.005
.021
.016
.016
.040
.OZ5
.000
.063
.005
.006
.005
.005
.000
90
.005
.051
.005
.043
.051
.010
.015
.016
.007
.017
.007
.030
.025
.024
.053
.032
.000
.070
.011
,008
.014
.014
.009
Max
.007
.068
.005
.057
.058
.014
.067
.024
.008
.045
.014
,082
.029
.038
.065
.053
.000
.096
.01*
.025
.100
.100
.011
Arllh
mean
.001
.028
.001
.030
.027
.002
.006
.009
.001
.006
,003
.013
.010
.010
.021
.015
.000
.048
.003
.003
.006
.005
.002
Seo
•nean
.001
.022
.001
.026
.023
.002
.003
.008
,001
.002
.002
.005
.007
.007
.013
.008
.000
.045
.OOZ
.ooz
.ooz
.ooz
.001
Std
jeo
dev
1.87
2.23
1.71
Z.18
1.80
2.68
3.61
2.11
2.10
3.71
2.53
*.*7
2.69
2.87
3.21
3.48
1.00
l.*l
2.68
2.69
3.50
3.19
2.31
•Dan contributed by state or local agency.
101
-------
TableHO. CHROMIUM NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
HC'JTSn' Ssv COUNTY
SITC 01
HIM4PI.T COUNTY
SITt 01
COLORADO
MESA V6RDE NAT PK
SITt 01
FLCKI5A
SITE 01
KAHAL'I'.
SiTE OJ
fUr.f CrL">'TY
SITS 0]
PUERTO "ICC
LCCUILLC VTS
SITE 01
Year
<,3
*3
A3
63
63
63
6*
5°
No. of
samples
'.t
24
Z»
25
24
26
26
26
Concentration. |jg/m3
Mln
. ~"*^
..•?u
'-M
.1 10
.OM
,-OU
. ...10
.1.12
Frequency distribution ' Dercenllle
10
.000
,000
.000
.000
,002
.000
.000
.014
20
.000
.300
.000
.000
.003
.000
.000
.020
X
.000
.000
.000
.000
.004
.000
.008
.020
40
.000
.000
.000
.000
.006
.000
.008
.024
SO
.000
,000
.000
.000
.006
.000
.OOa
.024
60
.000
.002
.002
.000
.008
.000
.009
.028
70
.000
.004
.002
.OOC
.010
.002
.011
.032
80
.000
.009
.006
.000
.016
.003
.011
.037
90
.000
.011
,007
.000
.024
.208
.011
,040
Max
.000
.021
.019
.000
.036
.009
.013
.270
Arllh
mean
.000
.004
.003
.000
.010
.002
.007
.037
Qeo
nean
.000
.002
.002
.000
.006
.002
.006
.028
Sid
geo
dev'.
1.00
2.01
2.71
1.00
2. 67
2.12
2.67
1.84
'02.
•Data contributed by state ot local agency.
-------
Table 5-11. COBALT, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BURBANK
SITE 01
LONG BEACH
SITE 01
LOS ANGELES
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
NEW JERSEY
ELIZABETH
SITE 01
GLASSBORO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
Year
63
60
65
60
60
63
62
58
63
62
65
63
No. ol samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
25
25
25
26
24
23
24
25
24
25
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Max.
cone..
ng/m3
.008
.007
Station location
NEW YORK
GLEN COVE
SITE 01
HASSENA
SITE 01
NEK ROCHELLE
SITE 01
TROY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE
SITE 01
OREGON
MEDFORD
SITE 01
TEXAS
FORT WORTH
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
Year
60
60
60
60
62
61
62
63
65
SUM
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
21
24
25
21
24
22
25
22
25
47
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone .
ufl/m3
-------
Table 5-12. COBALT, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
GKANO CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUHBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
Year
63
63
63
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted.
26
26
22
25
Above
delect
quan.
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone.,
uO/n»3
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SHE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOqUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. ol samples
Collet
ted
24
26
26
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
0
1
Max.
cone..
ug/m*
.008
/'
-------
Table 5-13. COPPER, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ALASKA
*H T f 01
CAUFrsNTA
SITl 01
MTf 01
LCS c.-'geLSs
sue 01
SITk 01
SAN ,nse
SITL 01
KANSAS Cm
«!!«• 01
M1NNES11A
ST P.'.t)L
5UC 01
MISSOURI
SAW) CITr
sm 01
NEk JE'SfiV
S[Tf, "01
MTF' 01
JFftSFY ClTlr
MTf 01
NEfc YC"K
SITE 01
KFu KflCMELLF
MTF. 01
NC"TI- CA'OLIK'A
AS^EVtLLE
?]Tf 11
OREGOf
SITE 01
TEXAS
FT yr-TtH
SITf 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT | A<6 CI TV
SITt 01
Year
.0
65
*0
'0
A3
(.2
18
<.3
,2
*5
A3
fcO
HO
'2
61
1,2
63
65
63 65
•58
A4
SB A4
No. of
samples
7*
25
7?
2'
2*
24
"
24
25
?4
25
2',
75
«
'?
«
22
25
24
2e
74
Concentration, jja/m3
Win
.»*
."0
.03
."7
."4
.00
.11
.00
.04
.no
.02
.01
.02
,H2
.01
.03
.01
.03
.01
.00
.05
.00
.00
Frequency distribution - percentile
10
."5
."1
."4
.no
.'".
."1
.02
.00
.0-.
,n,
."'*
.01
.0?
.0.
."2
• "**
.03
.08
.03
.0"
.07
.04
.0?
20
.07
.01
.05
.11
.07
.02
.02
.00
.07
.04
.05
.01
.04
.03
.03
.04
.04
.10
.06
.01
.08
.06
.05
30
.oa
.12
.06
.13
.08
.02
.03
.00
.10
.04
.06
.02
.07
.04
.03
.06
.05
.11
.08
.03
.to
.07
.06
40
.09
.03
.07
.14
.09
.02
.03
.00
.11
.05
.06
.02
.09
.04
.03
.07
.06
.15
.10
.04
.12
.07
.07
50
.11
.04
.08
.21
.11
.03
.03
.01
.12
.06
.09
.02
.10
.04
.03
.07
.07
.19
.12
.95
.13
.08
.08
80
.15
.04
.10
.?4
.13
.04
.04
.01
.13
.OB
.12
.03
.12
.05
.04
.08
.08
.19
.15
.05
.14
.08
.09
70
.10
.17
.05
.11
.28
.15
.04
.04
.01
.15
.10
.15
.03
.'4
.05
.04
.09
.12
.21
.18
.06
.17
.09
.11
80
• 10
.17
.06
.12
.31
.24
.05
.04
.01
.17
.11
.17
.03
.20
.06
.04
.11
.14
.23
.20
.08
.18
.10
90
.13
.23
.06
.15
.35
.51
.05
.06
.02
.28
.13
.25
.05
.30
.06
.05
.15
.15
.35
.25
.14
.27
.11
.18
Max
.13
.54
.11
.25
.40
1.20
.08
.06
.03
.62
.24
.79
.42
.60
.09
.07
.54
.18
.42
.42
• 19
1*7
1 37
Aritti
mean
.07
.14
.04
.09
.22
.21
.03
.03
.01
.15
.08
.14
.04
.15
.05
.04
.11
.08
.19
.14
.06
.15
.08
.10
Geo
•nean
. 06
.12
.03
.08
.19
.14
.03
.03
.01
.13
,06
.10
.02
.10
.04
.03
.08
.07
.16
.10
.04
.13
.07
.07
Sid
yea
Oev
1.71
1.79
2.06
1.68
1.72
2.34
1.84
1.55
1.33
1.84
2.14
Z.21
2.36
2.40
1.44
1.54
2.02
2.11
1.81
1.97
2.58
1.69
1.T7
2.03
•Din contributed by sUU at local igncy.
105
-------
Table 5-14. COPPER, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
AKUONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOK6RY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOIOT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITt Ul
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PAKKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUCRTU RICO
LOQU1LLO NTS
SITE 01
Year
43
IS3
A3
63
«,3
A3
*4
S9
No. ol
samples
26
24
22
25
24
?6
26
2'>
Concentration, >ig/m3
Mln
.01
.00
.01
.no
.no
.00
.01
.no
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
.ni
,r>n
.ni
.on
.00
.01
.01
.on
20
.01
.00
.01
.00
.00
.02
.02
.00
X
.01
.ni
.02
.01
.no
.02
.02
.01
40
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.02
.02
.02
SO
.01
.01
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.02
60
.02
.01
.02
.02
.01
.02
.03
.03
70
.03
.01
.03
.02
.01
.03
.0*
.04
80
.03
.01
.04
.03
.02
.03
.05
.04
90
.05
.01
.05
.03
.02
.07
.10
.06
Max
.15
.04
.08
.07
.04
.23
.17
.14
Arlth
mean
.03
.01
.03
.02
.01
.03
.04
.01
Geo
Dean
.02
.01
.02
.02
.01
.02
.03
.02
Std
oeo
deV
Z.ll
1.33
1.88
1.76
1.46
2.09
2.12
2.13
106
•Data contributed by ante or local agency.
-------
Tanle 5-15. IRON, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
AL-IS".
-•O "-MC.l
'•IT, 01
CALIF- ' .1*
8l_Ka- •'•-
JIT. Ill
UC'i'"- tt»C»-
«ni nj
l^S •••••OFLFi
= [TI 01
PAS'*' ^'.A
«IT' HI
5«f| .i15F
S 1 T t 01
KA'.S"
>«:,<;, •-, rit(
5|Ti ni
M j M.jt * " f a
SI o. I,L
MTI .11
"15V!"]
«»•!«: "S riTr
CITI ni
NEh J!"i^Y
£II7>«"ETH
«|T( 01
C-L'.«'-"Ci3C
1 1 I : '11
jFS^i v CIT>
«I" 01
N£U V"",.
wAsv«
5|Tr 01
It -"lHtuF
SIT nj
NCRT" C»HCUMA
A«H»-»LI.E
si" "i
OSES" •
l»F[>F.">i;
c |?r 01
IE»*S
FT V:TH
Sift 01
HUUSTCN
SITE Cl
UAH
5»l T I.A
7*t
7S
2<*
2s
72
2S
22
25
47
2'.
7/,
74
/(>
Concentration, pg/m3
MID
.1
• 6
.5
.3
.3
tt
6
.1
f 1
.3
, 1
(_i
.&
.0
S2
.0
,5
,u
.2
.0
Frequency distribution • percentile
10
.2
,o
i.?
tt.
m ^
s 7
• 7.
1 1,
f j
• *
,?
.7
,2
,4
.3
. ,'•
.?
• "*
,*i
20
.3
I.*
1,5
• 6
.9
• 8
• t
t 7
m £
• 6
,3
* 3
i • (
2
.3
.4
,4
.6
.4
• 4
.5
30
• 6
i 5
1 ml
1 3
.7
• 9
• 9
• 3
.a
«3
• 6
. 5
1.2
a 5
S4
• 6
,5
.7
.5
.5
.6
40
.8
i 7
I »B
.7
• 9
i t
» • I
q
• 8
e
• ?
L.O
,4
• 5
1.3
e
• 5
,7
• 6
,9
.?
.r
,7
50
1.0
7 0
t, * w
^•3
I C
4 • 3
*8
1*1
1 *2
i»0
, t
i * t
5
1.5
• 5
i 2
» 6
1.5
• b
.7
• 8
,7
1*1
.7
,a
.9
60
1,6
2 3
2 %
i.2
* • 3
1 ^
^ 2
1 P
l.*
• 6
1.6
£
1 *.
I ,O
<.ft
i «0
,9
1.0
1**
.*
• 9
Ul
70
2.6
* j
3q
• T
2 t
U*
1*5
i .6
^ 2
2 0
.6
1.7
*B
21
• i
• 8
4.8
7
• '
1.0
1.1
1. 1
1.6
1.3
Ul
U2
80
3.°
4 C
5.0
3 7
1.7
2.1
2[\
*tf
1 6
• 8
1.8
1.3
3-
.*»
.8
3.0
If
• '
1*3
1*2
1.3
2,0
1.*
1.2
1.6
90
5.3
/, •*
*** ^
K ft
O. U
*»»fl
3.2
2.7
3.2
1 Q
1 . T
3>
«*
1 0
1.6
1.3
t *4
1.1
3*4
4 7
•*•'
3.2
2,3
2.5
2.1
2.2
1.5
2.1
Max
".7
« • fl
Qo 5
P. 8
-------
Tatle 5-16. IRON, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITS 01
CALIFORNIA
HUHBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA V6RD6 NAT PK
SITE 01
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAhAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOOUILLO NTS
SITE 01
Year
f
A3
43
63
A3
f,'l
A
?&
Concentration. yg/m3
Mln
.0
Frequency distribution * percent Me
10
n
.1
20
.1
30
.2
40
.2
50
.2
60
.3
70
t
-------
Table 5-17. LEAD, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ALASKA
AKCMriAOE
SIT! 01
CALlFMUIA
BLR^'iK.
MT;: 01
LONS 8EACH
SITE 01
LfS ANOfcLES
SITi: 111
pASA-.cfjA
'lit 01
SAM JiSK
«iit: 11
KAN'S"'.
ICANV.S CITY
>)
<,0
65
*0
AO
ft3
58
<,3
<.2
65
",1
<,0
A2
".I
63
6!>
63 65
7^V
Concentration. pg/m3
Win
.3
.1
• u
Frequency distribution - pereentjle
10
,r»
ts
.2
20
i.O
.3
30
1,6
. -J
40
i.d
,<»
50
>!.2
.^
60
2.3
.5
.2
70
3.1
.7
.3
80
3.6
.9
90
<-.9
1.2
1.2
Max
l%n
7.2
3.0
1.5
Arnh
mean
2.9
2.*
* .«
I.I
.3
Geo
•nean
1.3
2.0
,5
.a
std
o«o
dev
2,59
2.25
2.45
2.34
1.94
•Data contiibuttd by stiki ac Ucal afaacy.
109
-------
Table 5-18. LEAD, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLOT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
FLORIDA
KONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITh 01
PUERTO RICO
LOOUILLO MTS
SITE 01
Year
A3
A3
A3
A3
A3
03
•59
No. of
samples
2*
24
22
2S
24
21,
26
Concentration, ug/m3
Mln
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
.1
.n
.0
.n
.n
.n
.0
20
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
30
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
40
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
so
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
60
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
70
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
80
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
90
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
• 0
.0
Max
.2
,0
.0
.0
.0
.0
• 2
.0
Arlth
mean
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
. 1
.0
I
Geo
nean
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
. 1
.0
Sid
ev
1.15
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.21
I. 00
•Data contributed by atata or local agency.
-------
Table 5-19. MANGANESE, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
SITI '11
CALIF'- > -IA
SIT:. *'ll
SITI 01
LCS '•'(•F.LF;,
S|T» 01
«lTt 0]
SITI" 11
7.Ar;S.'r. CITY
MTt m
51 n.'."L
MTT 01
"ISSC'.'M
'.M.S.-.S CITY
51TI 01
KEk jr»5*Y
'W"-?1
MV" 11
JEKSrv cm-
SIT' 01
NEB Yf'K
i/ ft s ^ r *•' A
«1T>' "l
\E». rKKELLF
SIT' 111
NCRT" rA°CU>iA
fVCuF- ' I • i F
MT'' 'ill
CREGC':
t'FOFCnD
SITC 01
TEXAS
KT vi-H'i
HOUSTON
SITE 01
SALT I.KE (.TTv
SITI. 01
Year
A3
AO
A5
AO
AO
A3
A2
*e
A3
A2
AS
63
AO
AO
A2
Al
A2
63
65
(.3 65
i*
*<>
5«* «•*
NO. Of
samples
3A
2A
2S
«
2*
24
24
•">
2.
?"
7,
2'
2«
25
2"!
??
7S
22
25
47
7'.
76
24
7'.
Concentration, pg/m3
Mln
.00
."0
.00
.00
.00
.0.
.01
.112
,"U
."0
."0
.00
.00
.01
.00
.04
."1
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
.00
."2
.00
.0?
.0,
.""
.0?
.02
.'">
,00
.00
.00
.00
• °1
.»o
.11
, nl
.01
.01
.01
.00
.01
,00
.011
20
.00
.03
.00
.03
.01
.01
.02
.03
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.07
.01
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
30
.01
.-3
.01
.oj
.02
.02
.•>2
.03
,<-l
.02
.02
.02
.01
.02
.ni
.10
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
.01
.02
40
.02
.04
.01
.03
.04
.02
.03
.04
.02
.02
.02
.03
.01
.02
.02
.11
.02
.02
.03
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
50
.02
.04
.11
.04
.04
,03
.03
.05
.03
.02
.02
.03
.02
.03
.02
.12
.12
.02
.04
.03
.03
.02
.92
90
.03
.06
.01
.04
.04
.03
.04
.05
.03
.03
.02
.03
.02
.03
.02
.15
.02
.03
.05
.04
.04
.03
.02
.03
70
,04
,06
.02
.06
.05
.04
.05
.06
.04
.05
.03
.04
.02
.04
.02
.16
.04
.06
.08
.07
.05
.04
.03
.04
80
.08
.07
.02
.06
.06
.05
.07
.06
.06
.05
.05
.04
.03
.05
.02
.17
.05
.11
.08
.08
.08
.05
.03
.05
go
.12
.OB
.03
.08
.07
.06
.07
.08
,07
.13
.07
.07
.04
.06
.04
.20
.08
.27
.09
.19
.10
.07
.04
.07
Max
.18
.14
.03
.11
.38
.09
.17
,00
.21
.15
.09
.10
.07
.11
.05
.37
.13
.45
.57
.57
.13
.12
.05
.13
Arlth
mean
.04
.05
.01
.05
.0-5
.03
.05
.05
.04
.04
.03
.03
.02
.03
.02
.13
.04
.08
.07
.08
.04
.03
.02
.03
Geo
•nean
.03
.04
.01
.04
.04
.03
.03
.04
.03
.03
.03
.03
.02
.03
.02
.12
.03
.04
.04
.04
.03
.03
.02
.03
SU
geo
aev
2.62
1.82
1.56
1.75
2.41
1.94
2.02
1.60
2.15
2.28
1.97
1.94
1.S4
2.03
1.68
1.72
2.18
3.31
2.55
2.93
2.18
1.94
1.79
1.97
•Data contributed by state or local agency.
Ill
-------
Table 5-20. MANGANESE, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUM80LDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOOU1LLO MTS
SITE 01
Year
f
A3
63
63
63
63
A3
6*
59
^
No. ol
samples
26
24
22
2?
24
26
26
26
Concentration. ug/m3
Mln
.00
.00
.00
.no
.00
.00
.00
.no
Frequency distribution - percent! le
.10
.n'
• n'
.no
.no
.on
.on
.on
.on
20
.no
.00
.no
.no
.00
.00
.m
.00
30
.00
.00
.00
.00
.no
.no
.ni
.no
40
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
so
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
60
.Of,
.01
.00
.no
.00
.no
.02
.no
70
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.03
.02
80
.01
.01
.00
.00
.01
.00
.03
.03
90
.01
.01
.00
.01
.01
.01
.03
.04
Max
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.05
.on
Arlth
mean
.oc
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.01
Geo
•nean
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.02
Std
geo
doV
1.00
1.00
l.OO
1.00
1.00
1.15
».7l
1.89
•Data contributed by state or leal agency.
-------
Table 5-21. MOLYBDENUM, URBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BURBANK
SITE 01
LONG BEACH
SITE 01
LOS ANGELES
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
NEW JERSEY
ELIZABETH
SITE 01
GLASS80RO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
Year
63
60
65
60
60
63
62
58
63
62
65
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
26
26
25
25
25
26
24
23
24
25
24
25
Above
detect.
quan.
0
3
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
Max.
cone.,
ug/m3
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Station location
NEW YORK
GLEN COVE
SITE 01
MASSENA
SITE 01
NEW ROCHELLE
SITE 01
TROY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE
SITE 01
OREGON
MEDFORD
SITE 01
TEXAS
FORT WORTH
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
Year
60
60
60
60
62
61
62
63
65
SUM
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
21
24
25
21
25
22
25
22
25
47
26
Above
detect.
quan.
2
1
2
2
0
0
3
4
4
8
5
Max.
cone..
ug/m3
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
-------
Table 5-22. MOLYBDENUM, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
Yew
63
63
63
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted •
26
26
22
25
Above
detect
quan.
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
U8/m3
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOQUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. ol samples
Codec
ted
24
26
26
26
Above
delect.
quan.
0
0
1
0
Max.
cone..
uo/m3
0.01
114
-------
Table 5-23. NICKEL, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ANCUCPA6E
SITE 01
CALIFO»"!«
SITE 01
LCNG «EACH
SITE 01
LCS ANGELES
SITE 01
PASACFNA
SITE 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS ClTY
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
ST. DAI.lL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
NEW JERSf-Y
ELIZAHETu
SITE 01
GLASSBORO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEW Y09K
GLEN COVE
SITE 01
MASSENA
SITE 01
NEta ROCHELLE
SITE 01
NEfc YOR<
TfOY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEviLLE
SITE 01
OREGON
MEDFOQD
SITE 01
TEXAS
FT WORTH
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
Year
63
60
65
60
60
63
62
58
63
62
65
63
60
60
60
60
62
61
62
63
65
63 65
63
No. 01
amples
26
26
25
2f
25
26
24
23
24
2i
74
25
21
24
25
21
2S
22
25
22
25
4f
26
Concentration. jig/m3
Mln
••>oo
113
UOU
•'12
1)09
.fOO
,-jou
.006
,'JOO
.011
,000
Oil
005
000
Oil
006
"00
012
000
000
JOO
ooo
•100
Frequency distribution - percent! le
10
.000
,U16
.006
.315
.015
.000
.000
.007
.000
.018
.000
.022
.008
.000
.01*
.010
.000
.U14
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
20
.007
.018
.012
.016
.018
.005
.005
.008
.000
.021
.006
.027
.011
.000
.017
.Oil
.000
.020
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
30
.009
.019
.016
.022
.020
.007
.007
.008
.005
.024
.009
.030
.012
.000
.021
.012
.000
.022
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
40
.012
,024
.017
.023
.020
.008
.007
,010
.007
.024
.010
.035
.013
.006
.035
.014
.000
.024
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
50
.017
.030
.020
.029
.021
.008
.007
.011
.007
.032
.012
.045
.015
.007
.037
.017
.000
.026
.000
.005
.005
.005
.006
60
.018
.033
.023
.037
.024
.012
.008
.011
.008
.038
.014
.050
.016
.008
.048
.017
.000
.033
.000
.007
.005
.006
.008
70
.021
.043
.025
.048
.042
.014
.010
.013
.009
.045
.015
.063
.021
.008
.063
.019
.000
.039
.006
.010
.007
.008
.010
80
.026
,050
.031
.058
.043
.022
.017
.016
.012
.0*9
.025
.06*
.046
.012
.076
,02*
,000
.040
.008
.014
.010
.01*
.012
90
.033
.070
.0*2
.091
.056
.030
.017
.020
.021
.073
.030
.110
.071
.016
.110
.040
.006
.052
.012
.02*
.022
.024
.020
Max
.038
.079
.068
.100
.210
.051
.021
.026
.028
.220
.051
.150
.100
.051
.420
.052
.010
.070
.029
.039
.060
.060
.028
Arlth
mean
.016
.03*
.023
.040
.038
.013
.009
.012
.008
.047
.015
.054
.028
.009
.06*
.020
.001
.031
,00*
.008
.009
.009
.007
Geo
•nean
Oil
030
017
033
028
008
.006
.011
.005
.035
,010
,0*5
,019
,005
,0*0
,017
001
028
002
00*
00*
00*
00*
Sid
geo
deV
3.15
1.69
2.75
1.91
1.97
3.26
2.59
1.48
3.12
1.99
2.90
1.86
2.*0
3.53
2.*e
1.7*
Z.01
1.60
3.13
3.93
*.oo
3.97
9.6*
•Dm camilhttd by SUM «!•«•' •«•>«»•
U5
-------
Table 5-24. NICKEL, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
MC«T»"! -FIJY cc'j'JTr
SIT; "1
CALIF"," n
Hfl-l.T COUNTY
SIT 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
SIT"' P!
"I™"'**
INOIV a
PA*->
. Oj
.',13
..o,
.-•>3
..11
Frequency distribution - percent! le
10
.010
.000
.000
,"?0
...4
.r,o
.."6
20
.000
.000
.000
.000
.005
.000
.006
.012
30
.000
.000
.000
.ono
.009
.000
.006
.013
40
.000
.000
.000
.000
.011
.002
.006
.014
50
.000
.000
.002
.000
.011
.003
.007
.015
60
.aoo
.002
.J03
.000
.'ill.
.004
.307
.017
70
.000
.002
.005
.000
.017
.006
.00(1
.020
80
.002
.003
.004
.000
.024
.007
.008
.023
90
.003
.004
.008
.000
.026
.010
.009
.170
Max
.003
.007
,010
,000
.034
.03.
.014
,760
Aril!)
mean
.001
.001
.003
.000
.014
.005
.007
.062
I
1
Geo
•near.
.001
.002
.002
.000
.011
.003
.007
.023
Sid
geo
dev
1.49
1.64
2.21
1.00
2.0!
2.90
1.57
2.94
•Dm contributed by sate Of local agency.
-------
Table 5-25. TIN, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
SITC 01
BL S«AKK
SIT:: 01
Lr;.-r- -*LftCP
MT': 01
«ITF 01
P'SA'JFi,*
MT-. o:
MT>: 01
<]Ti: 01
ST PAUL
SITE 01
SIT': 01
Kt, J-»SFY
SITI" 01
«ITi? 01
JtRS'v CITY
5 I T il 01
5JT'i 01
'SIT:' ni '
NCRTU C»»CLI«(A
ASHR 'iLi.F
SIT,: 01
SIT" 01
FT V'PF'
MTH 01
HOUSTON
sire 01
SALT IAKI: •-ll*
MT: "i
Year
1
A3
40
AS
60
AO
A3
,2
58
A3
A2
A5
A3
AO
AO
62
Al
A2
63
65
63 65
•id
A3
A4
if »»
No. of
samples
2A
74
25
7<
76
2A
2'.
23
M
?»
2..
"
7,
?S
71
22
71
22
25
47
24
2*
2'.
Concentration. ug/m3
Mln
.00
."u
."0
.12
."0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.10
.10
,0u
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Id
.00
.00
.00
Frequency distribution - oercentlle
10
.on
,00
.->
.07
.0"
.on
.11
.no
,nr
.in
.0*1
.00
.11
.10
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.11
.Pi
.CO
20
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.10
.10
.00
.H
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
.00
.00
30
.00
.00
.00
.03
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
loo
.00
.00
40
.00
.00
.00
.04
.00
.00
.-00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.03
.00
.00
.00
50
.00
.00
.00
.04
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.no
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.03
.00
.00
.00
60
.00
.00
.00
.06
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.00
.01
.00
.02
.00
.01
.00
.01
.04
.00
.10
.10
70
.00
.00
.00
.06
.01
.00
.10
.00
.00
.01
."1
.02
.00
.03
.00
.02
.00
.01
.01
.01
.04
.00
.00
.01
80
.00
.00
.00
.07
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.01
.02
.00
.03
.00
.03
.01
.02
.01
.01
.05
.00
.00
.03
90
.00
.01
.00
.07
.01
.00
.01
.01
.00
.02
.02
.02
.01
.07
.00
.04
.01
.02
.01
.02
.06
.00
.00
.04
Max
.00
.02
.00
.OS
.32
.01
.01
.0?
.01
.03
.03
.02
.01
.10
.00
.09
.02
.03
.02
.03
.OS
.02
.01
.OR
Arith
mean
.00
.00
.00
.05
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.01
.01
.00
.02
.00
.02
.00
.01
.00
.01
.03
.00
.00
.01
Geo
•nean
.00
.01
.00
.04
.01
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.01
.01
.00
.02
.00
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.03
.01
.00
.00
su
oec
oev
1.00
1.15
1. 00
l.AO
1.15
1.00
1.00
1.16
1.00
1.41
1.33
1.40
I. 00
2.18
1.00
1.91
1.15
1.43
1.15
1.31
1.76
1.15
1.00
1.40
-------
Table 5-26. TIN, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
CSAND CANYON NAT PK
SITt 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VEROE NAT PK
SITE 01
Year
63
63
63
63
No. of samples
Collec-
ted .
26
26
22
25
Above
detect
quan.
0
0
0
0
Max.
cone..
ug/m>
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOQUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
24
26
26
26
Above
detect.
quan.
0
0
1
0
Max.
cone.,
uo7m3
0.01
118
-------
Table 5-27. TITANIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
MT; "l
CALIF.^'.tA
MT>; DI
SITf 01
LC!> '.•Ujf.tFh
«ITF 01
A3
50 A4
No. of
samples
26
ZS
"
2.
2A
*,
113
24
2",
'.-
25
24
25
'•>
22
25
22
25
2<.
26
24
Mln
.no
.00
.01
,nu
.no
.00
.OK
.00
.00
.nu
.00
.«u
.no
.00
.«
.00
.00
.00
.00
.ni
loo
.no
.no
Concentration, pg/m3
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
."
.nl
."I
.no
. nn
.nn
.00
.on
.on
.01
.nn
."i
.nn
.On
.0'.
.nn
.00
.00
.00
.02
.no
.no
.00
20
,05
.01
.06
.01
.01
.ni
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.03
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
.01
.00
30
.06
."3
.07
.03
.01
.02
.01
.01
.00
.01
.00
.00
.01
.01
.11
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.no
.01
.01
40
.03
.03
.08
.04
.02
.02
.01
.01
.00
.01
.01
.00
.01
.01
.12
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
.01
.01
SO
.08
.04
.10
.06
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.00
.02
,01
.15
.00
.00
.00
.00
.03
,00
.01
.02
60
.10
.04
.10
,n6
.03
.02
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.00
.02
.01
.22
.00
.00
.00
.00
.04
.01
."2
.02
70
.14
.04
.14
.08
.04
.02
.02
.03
.01
.02
.02
.00
.03
.02
.25
.00
.00
.01
.00
.05
.01
.02
.02
80
.17
.05
.22
.12
.05
.04
.02
.03
.02
.02
,02
.01
.04
.02
.27
,00
.00
.01
.01
.08
.02
.03
.04
90
.20
.03
.24
.18
.08
.07
.05
.04
.03
.02
.03
.01
.06
.03
.32
.02
.02
.01
.02
.13
.04
.03
.06
Max
.31
.3"
.10
.48
.44
.12
.11
.06
.05
.04
.05
.03
.05
.19
.04
.45
.03
.02
.05
.05
.16
.06
.0*
.16
Arllh
mean
• OR
.11
.04
.13
.08
.03
.03
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.00
.03
.01
.IB
,00
.00
.01
.01
.05
.01
.02
.03
Geo
•near)
. 04
.08
.03
.10
.05
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.14
.01
.01
.01
.01
.04
.01
.01
.02
Std
geo
aev
3.28
2.28
2,08
2.19
3.01
2.32
1.99
1.83
1.81
1.54
1.65
1.53
1.39
2.24
1.63
2.34
1.33
1.28
1.47
1.38
2.15
1.76
1.67
1.87
•Data contributed by sat* or local agency.
119
-------
Table 5-28. TITANIUM, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
BRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITt 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLOT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
FLORIDA
"ONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
P4RK.E COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOOUILLO MTS
SITE 01
Year
f
A3
A3
43
A3
A3
A3
64
No. of
samples
26
24
22
25
?«,
26
2A
26
Concentration, ng/m3
Mln
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
Frequency distribution • percentlle
10
.on
.on
.00
.00
,nn
.no
.01
.01
20
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.01
30
.00
.00
.00
.00
.10
.01
.02
.01
40
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.01
SO
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.02
60
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.02
70
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.03
.02
80
.01
.00
.00
.01
.00
.02
.03
.03
90
.01
.00
.00
.01
.00
.03
.04
.04
Max
.02
.00
.01
.02
.01
.04
.04
.09
Arith
mean
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.02
1
Geo
nean
.01
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.02
.02
Std
geo
dev'
1.15
1.00
1.00
1.15
1.00
1.58
1.51
1.88
•Data ceiftihttod by state er Uc*l
-------
Table 5-29. VANADIUM, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ALASKA
ANCHC°AGE
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
BtRBANK
SITE 01
LCNG 9EACH
SIT? 01
LOS A'lGELES
SITE 01
PASADENA
SIT? 01
SAN JOSE
SITE 01
KANSAS
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CTTY
SITE 01
NE*> JERSEY
ELIZABETH
SITE 01
SLASS'WPC
SITS 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEU Y09K
6LEN COVE
SITE 01
MASSFNA
SITE 01
NEw snCHELLE
SITE 01
TROY
SITE 01
NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE
SITE 01
OREGON
SITE 01
TEXAS
FT WG3TH
SITE 01
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT L'-KE CITY
SITE 01
Year
63
60
65
60
60
63
62
58
63
62
45
63
60
ISO
60
40
62
61
62
63
65
63 65
63
No. ol
samples
26,
26
7.1
25
25
26
24
23
24
25
24
25
21
24
25
21
26
22
25
22
25
47
26
Concentration, jjg/m3
Mln
.''00
.000
,T)0
.COO
.ecu
,'JOO
.(00
."DO
.->ou
.' 32
.'00
."71
,ono
.000
.•"(•4
.1*10
..'00
.c/00
.000
.coo
.000
.uOO
,"00
Frequency distribution - percentile
10
,000
.000
.006
."04
.005
,noo
.000
.000
.110
. >47
.003
.100
.012
.000
,0»2
.013
.000
,000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
20
.000
.012
.007
,005
.011
.000
.000
,000
.000
.062
.007
.120
.016
.000
.092
.022
.000
.005
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
30
.002
.014
.007
.006
.012
.000
.000
.000
.ono
.0*3
.011
.140
.023
.004
,150
.028
.000
.006
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
40
.003
.019
.008
.006
.013
.000
.002
.007
.000
.095
.013
,180
.034
.005
,210
.046
.000
,007
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
so
.006
.019
.Oil
.014
.015
.000
.003
.008
.003
.110
.018
.200
.050
.006
.260
.049
.010
.016
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
60
.007
.027
.014
.019
.020
.000
.004
.008
.006
.120
.02S
.220
.063
.007
.280
.060
.000
.019
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
TO
.009
.042
.015
.034
.025
.000
.005
.013
.009
.140
.030
.280
.082
.009
.360
.077
.000
.023
.000
.000
.003
.000
.00"
80
.010
.046
.018
.036
.035
.007
.005
.017
.011
.160
.046
.330
.270
.021
.420
.IOC
.000
.024
.DOC
.000
.003
.003
.000
90
.Oil
.053
.031
.051
.058
.018
.007
.029
.014
.290
.068
.490
.400
.043
.710
.150
.005
.028
.000
.000
.004
.00*
.000
Max
.023
.077
.038
.130
.200
.025
.014
.046
.040
.910
.150
.860
.770
.150
1.30C
.31C
.02!
.091
.007
.00<
.005
.00;
.001
Arith
.006
.027
.014
.024
.030
.004
.003
.010
.006
.160
.030
.257
.133
.016
.315
.07(
.00:
.01!
.001
.001
.001
.001
.OOC
Geo
•neart
.00*
.017
.011
.013
.017
.002
.003
.006
.003
.115
.017
.210
.0*5
.006
.236
.0*3
.001
.010
.001
.001
.002
.001
.001
sia
geo
aev'
2.79
3.40
2.21
3.26
3.26
3.23
2.37 '
3.63
S.*8
'.12
3.*S
1.87
5.71
*.15
Z.18
*.*!
2.28
3.3*
1.48
1.72
I.IT
1.80
1.5*
•Data contributed by mi* or local agency.
-------
Table 5-30. VANADIUM, NONURBAN ABBREVIATED FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Station location
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
Year '
63
63
63
63
No. ol samples
Col lee.
ted
26
24
22
25
Above
delect.
quart.
1
0
1
0
Max.
cone..
ugfnfl
.001
.001
Station location
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUJ
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKE COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
LOQUILLO MOUNTAINS
SITE 01
Year
63
63
64
59
No. of samples
Collec-
ted
24
26
26
26
Above
detect.
quan.
7
5
23
5
1
Max.
cone..
ug/m3
.003
.011
.007
.006
122.
-------
Table 5-31. ZINC, URBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
Al«5«
?|TI 01
BO"'-"*
SITi. 01
LCHS 1E«CK
••IT 01
LCS .V'GFLES
"1TL 01
«IT'. 01
Sf'i JoiF
MTl •)!
He--*."1; CITY
•=1T' It
ST ",'.'.'L
r.tL,*,'.* CITY
51 IZ.'O'.TK
?|TF. 01
MTE 01
JFP">I.* CITY
SITI 01
NEh YroK
MTt 01
f.E/1 "1C"ELUF
'ITT Ol
TROY
«|T- 01
SITS 01
ORES'!.!
SITI. 11
TEX6S
FT «r>r>TH
SITr -Jl
HOUSTON
SITE 01
UTA*
SALT Lfc
-------
Table $-32. ZINC, NONURBAN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
SITE 01
CALIFORNIA
HUHBULDT COUNTY
SITE 01
COLORADO
MESA VERDE NAT PK
SITE 01
FLORIDA
MONROE COUNTY
SITE 01
HAWAII
KAHALUU
SITE 02
INDIANA
PARKS COUNTY
SITE 01
PUERTO RICO
L08UILLO MTS
SITE 01
Year
A3
63
<,3
f.3
A3
63
A4
$9
No. ol
samples
26
24
22
25
24
26
26
26
Concentration. M9/nt3
Min
.00
.00
.00
.00
.no
.no
.00
.00
Frequency distribution - percemlle
10
.00
.on
.00
.no
.on
.00
.00
.on
20
.00
.00
.no
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
30
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.no
.00
.no
40
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
50
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
60
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
70
.00
.07
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
80
.00
.10
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
90
.00
.16
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.60
Max
.00
.23
.47
.06
.00
.00
.22
.77
Art Hi
mean
.00
.04
.03
.00
.00
.00
.01
.08
Qeo
•nean
.00
.02
.01
.01
.00
.00
.01
.02
i
Std
1.00
3.39
2.84
1.43
1.00
I. 00
1.83
3.94
124
•Data contributed by SUM or local agency.
-------
SECTION 6.
GASEOUS POLLUTANTS
AND SOILING INDEX
-------
QC
I-
UJ
O
100
80
60
40 —
20
11 i in i i i i i i i i i
CARBON MONOXIDE
CHICAGO
CINCINNATI
DENVER
PHILADELPHIA
ST. LOUIS
_,_ WASHINGTON
11 i i i i /f//i
0.01 0.1 0.5 1 2 S 10 20 40 £0
80
95
99 99.8 99.99
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS
THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 6-1. Annual frequency distributions of carbon monoxide,
CAMP, 1967.
Table 6-1. CARBON MONOXIDE ANNUAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS, CAMP, 1967.
City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
Philadelphia
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Percent
of
val id
data
44
75
79
88
91
87
Concentration, ppm
Frequency distribution, percent
Minimum
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
2
3
2
2
2
2
30
5
k
k
k
'(
3
50
7
5
7
6
5
4
70
11
7
9
8
6
5
90
17
9
14
11
10
8
95
21
10
17
13
12
9
98
25
12
22
16
16
12
99
28
14
27
19
19
15
Max i mum
63
47
63
44
60
37
Mean
8.8
5.6
•7.7
6.3
5.6
4.8
127
-------
0.8
0.6
0.4
£
£ 0.2
o
h-
< 0.10
a
^ 0.08
tij
U 0.06
Z
o
0 0.04
0.02
0.01
-MM I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 |.|, x-
— NITRIC OXIDE / S' —
— CHICAGO :'/> x-—
CINCINNATI /// .S S'
— DENVER /" / X X ~~
_ PHILADELPHIA ./ 4* ,*' ,-'
ST. LOUIS /' •»' /.•''
_._ WASHINGTON /'••//'''
~ Ir is,' ~
,/>'
y" •* -x
.•* •* / .£
"~ ./ // • ?/ —
/ ••' /^ ~
/ /// -
! / //
- / / //
II 1 1 1 1 1 1 / L-'-'l^Vl 1 1 1 1 1 II
0.01 0.1 0.51 2 5 10 20 40 60 80 95
99
99.8
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS
THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
99.99
Figure 6-2. Annual frequency distributions of nitric oxide,
CAMP, 1967.
Table 6-2. NITRIC OXIDE ANNUAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS, CAMP, 1967.
City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
Philadelphia
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Percent
of
valid
data
80
69
55
80
81)
85
Concentration, ppm
Frequency distribution, percent
Mini mum
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
30
0.0
-------
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
E
a 0.2
z
o
H
2 °'10
r 0-08
u 0.06
z
0
u 0.04
0.02
0.01
III
1
Mil
i
1
1 M -
_ NITROGEN DIOXIDE ~
— CHICAGO "^
CINCINNATI ~~
- DENVER —
PHILADELPHIA
ST. LOUIS -7
—i— WASHINGTON
—
—
__
—
—
II 1
0.01 0.1 O.S i
y
Ss*-
/&/
/Vi/'i/i i
^
'-"
2 5 10 20 40 60
^.••''
..* jf
sf"*'
' .;'•
'*
\
80
S''.
y
S
••'.?
*&'
'/
**
£r*f
, 1
f'S/
/pi
Sj? 1
JV 1
TT ' '—
/'/'' —
/<*'' ~~
—
-
—
1 1
95 99 99.8 99.99
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS
THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 6-3. Annual frequency distributions of nitrogen dioxide,
CAMP, 1967.
Table 6-3. NITROGEN DIOXIDE ANNUAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS, CAMP, 1967.
City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Denver
Phi ladelphia
St. Louis
Washington, D.C.
Percent
of
data
75
77
5*
85
89
81
Concentration, ppm
Frequency distribution, percent
Mi nimum
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
30
O.O'l
0.02
O.OJ
0.03
0.02
0.03
50
0.05
0.03
0.03
O.O'l
0.02
O.Oll
70
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.05
90
0.08
O.O'l
0.06
0.07
0.04
0.07
95
0.09
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.05
0.08
98
0.11
0.06
0.09
0.10
0.06
0.10
99
0.12
0.07
0.11
0.12
0.06
0.11
Maximum
0.29
0.70
0.37
O.'l'i
0.17
0.2»l
Mean
0.049
0.028
0.037
0.042
0.024
0.042
129
-------
E
a.
a.
2
O
1—
a
i-
z
UJ
u
O
u
I >W
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.01
- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II
— SULFUR DIOXIDE
••• CHICAGO
CINCINNATI
— DENVER
PHILADELPHIA
— ST. LOUIS
-•— WASHINGTON
—
—
—
__
..7
— / /
•-'' ••'/
/ //
1
II 1 1 1 1 M .. 1 1 .2:
,s"' _..•••'—
/ ,•••'"' /I
* ** t ^^
,••'' .-' «' *s^—
/ ..-•• /.f
/ / //' ~
/ .-•'* •'/* / S —
/ / / ' '' /
,' / *,' / /
/•'' / ' •' —
• •"* •/ / —
'."** /^ ' / • —
./* '' / f —
/• / / —
/ / /
/ / / '
' / •''
// /
.' / / ~
y i
V\ 1 1 fl 1 1 1 II
0.01 0.1 0.5 1 2 S 10 20 40 60
80
95
99 99.8
99.99
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS
THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 6-4. Annual frequency distributions of sulfur dioxide,
CAMP, 1967.
Table 6-4. SULFUR DIOXIDE ANNUAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS, CAMP, 1967.
City
Ch i cago
Cincinnati
Denver
Philadelphia
S t . Lou i s
Washington, D.C.
Percent
of
valid
data
93
61
82
81
91
!|1|
Concentration, ppm
Frequency distribution, percent
Mini mum
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
30
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.02
50
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.07
0.01
0.04
70
0.15
0.02
0.00
0.11
0.03
0.06
90
0.32
0.04
0.02
0.22
0.08
0.10
95
0.43
0.06
0.03
0.30
0.12
0.12
98
0.57
0.10
0.04
0.39
0.17
0.15
99
0.68
0.13
0.06
0.46
0.21
0.18
Max i mum
1.62
0.65
0.33
1.12
0.90
0.53
Mean
0.125
0.021
0.005
0.098
0.029
0.048
130
-------
100
80
60
40
£
°- 20
O
h-
< 10
£ 8
111
U &
Z
0
u
4
2
1
~ \\ II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
— TOTAL HYDROCARBONS
—
— CHICAGO
CINCINNATI
DENVER
_ PHILADELPHIA
—
~
— —
—
~ ..••—'"' .4
1 1 -rl**""i i i i i i i
0.01 0.1 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 40 60
i in-
—
X
X#T-'-::"
/$' E
A'SJ*** —
X »>**".*""
*rir
-------
E
0.
*
Z
O
1—
<
(-
z
111
u
z
0
o
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.01
- 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
— TOTAL OXIDANTS
_ CHICAGO
CINCINNATI
DENVER
— ST. LOUIS
— •— WASHINGTON
—
—
—
—
ff
~ /$/
~ /fif?
////•$
1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 k/#//'l 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 II -
—
_
—
^_
t 5* •*
&&.>"
**&
'Q? —
'/$' ~
>'?& —
ff£'^^
•{if
f -
—
1 1 1 1 II
0.01 0.1 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 40 60 80
95
99 99.8 99.99
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS
THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 6-6. Annual frequency distributions of total oxidants,
CAMP, 1967.
Table 6-6. TOTAL OXIDANTS ANNUAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS, CAMP, 1967.
City
Ch i cago
Cincinnati
Denver
Phi ladelphia
St. Louis
Washington, D.C,
Percent
of
valid
data
60
57
39
67
69
78
Concentration, ppm
Frequency distribution, percent
Mini mum
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
0.00
0.0!
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
30
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
50
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
70
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
90
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.07
0.05
95
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.07
98^
0.08
0.10
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.09
r- gg
0.10
0.11
0.10
0.11
0.11
0.11
Maximum
0.18
0.25
0.25
0.19
0.27
0.23
Mean
0.028
0.031
0.027
0.026
0.034
0.025
132
-------
Table 6-7. CARBON MONOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
CHICAGO
DATE
1
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
Feb.
March
April
May
7.9
9.3
9.6
7.0
6.7
3.9
9.0
14.2
9.3
5.4
16.8
22.9
7.1
9.4
10.4
8.0
9.2
14.6
9.6
June
18.8
10.6
21.8
17.9
8.1
7.3
7.7
16.4
11.6
11.1
12.0
a*?
7.6
12.5
July
7.7
4.9
4.4
13.9
8.5
14.5
10.3
8.3
7.0
3.5
5.1
9.0
13.8
12.3
9.1
17.9
8.9
Aug.
8.5
12.8
11.9
6.6
8.6
7.6
9.7
10. 1
11.3
11.9
9.7
8.5
8.3
5.7
6.6
18.7
22.4
14.8
13.4
16.3
9.9
6.4
11.6
4.9
15.7
15.8
6.4
11.1
Sept.
13.3
0.1
5.3
11.1
17.2
14.9
8.2
6.2
13.5
9.3
12.7
9.8
5.6
4.5
9.7
6.3
9.4
Oct.
5.9
18.2
15.0
18.0
12.6
9.6
4.1
4.1
7.7
8.2
5.5
5.5
3.0
11.2
14.8
11.0
4.6
8.7
Nov.
9.4
8.7
5.0
5.0
5.5
6.2
8.1
5.4
6.0
6.2
7.1
6.5
7.5
6.7
7.6
5.4
3.7
5.4
9.3
6.4
Dec.
5.0
5.5
7.0
8.1
4.0
8.0
9.7
7.3
7.9
4.5
4.5
6.0
5.5
6.6
4.5
4.5
7.0
7.3
5.8
5.2
4.0
3.1
2.6
5.9
8.0
4.1
4.6
5.9
CINCINNATI
OATF
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
5.2
5.4
6.7
4.4
5.1
4.6
4.8
4.4
5.2
4.7
5.3
5.8
2.3
3.6
3.7
4.3
4.9
4.3
5.0
4.1
4. a
».4
2.5
4.5
Feb.
March
3.1
4.9
5.2
5.8
3.9
3.9
5.7
7.1
6.0
5.9
8.7
8.1
5.9
4.8
5.1
5.5
5.3
6.5
5.3
5.6
6.0
7.0
9.9
9.5
9.5
7.8
6.5
5.9
5.7
6.2
April
6.2
A.O
6.2
7.0
13.0
A. 3
A. 5
7.3
7.5
7.7
7.7
9.2
9.2
S.5
9.3
9.3
n.o
"5.6
5.3
*.7
7.2
5.5
5.»
6.*
7.2
«.l
n.o
B.9
9.3
".2
7.5
May
8.1
6.6
7.2
6.2
5.8
7.3
8.4
9.0
8.2
8.3
8.6
8.9
8.3
7.0
6.5
6.3
6.7
7.1
6.8
8.2
6.4
8.6
9.3
10.6
8.4
8.2
7.1
7.7
June
2.7
1.0
2.6
1.0
0.9
0.9
3.7
3.4
2.7
2.4
3.0
1.1
2.2
2.8
2.4
3.7
3.4
3.2
1.6
2.7
3.1
1.4
1.7
4.1
2.4
July
3.7
6.0
4.1
3.0
3.6
0.7
2.7
3.5
2.8
3.1
2.7
3.2
3.4
3.7
4.5
4.5
5.0
0.6
0.8
2.9
3.8
4.7
3.7
4.3
4.7
3.8
3.9
3.5
Aug.
5.3
4.6
5.4
5.5
8.1
9.8
4.3
8.1
8.0
5.3
5.7
4.5
5.2
5.8
5.2
4.5
6.0
Sept.
5.1
6.0
6.9
3.3
6.8
6.3
6.8
5.5
5.7
4.4
5.0
5.3
5.3
5.9
7.3
9.4
6.0
7.5
5.1
5.1
4.2
4.7
5.4
5,0
7.4
5.3
4.8
4.6
4.6
4.4
5.6
Oct.
4.8
5.4
6.3
5.9
6.0
5.5
5.4
5.1
5.0
4.9
4.8
7.5
6.8
6.3
5.5
5.2
5.9
4.5
5.9
6.2
7.2
8.7
8.1
5.6
5.0
5.5
6.2
6.3
6.1
5.9
Nov.
4.9
5.3
6.9
3.0
0.5
7.3
5.9
5.9
4.1
4.8
6.8
6.1
4.7
6.3
7.1
4.7
4.5
5.2
5.9
5.4
4.5
6.6
6.9
8.6
6.7
5.4
6.3
5.6
5.5
Dec.
5.4
5.6
4.8
6.4
7.4
6.6
4.8
7.2
5.9
4.8
5.7
5.4
5.8
4.5
4.4
9.8
10.3
6.1
5.3
5.5
5.3
4.7
4.2
5.0
5.3
6.1
6.1
S.O
5.8
133
-------
Table 6-7 (continued). CARBON MONOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(PPm)
DENVER
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jar:.
6.7
4.4
6.1
10.1
4.6
6.0
6.7
12.3
10.1
11.6
10.4
5.7
6.6
T.I
15.3
17.1
10.6
12.3
10.9
10.2
15.4
13.4
11.2
13.0
12.7
10.5
Feb.
10.4
12.9
10.9
9.5
7.1
5.8
9.*
7.4
8.2
5.6
7.4
7.0
8.6
10.7
2.2
4.8
7.0
6.2
8.7
6.1
*.8
7.6
March
7.8
9.0
5.2
1.3
5.2
3.0
8.5
12.5
14.5
9.9
9.2
8.5
9.3
7.6
7.1
7.3
8.5
9.6
9.2
5.9
8.5
5.8
4.2
5.8
7.3
April
3.9
Z.6
6.2
9.Z
4.6
7.2
7.1
4.7
6.6
6.7
3.0
6.2
3.1
7.2
5.2
4.6
2.6
1.2
4.3
5.8
».9
5.1
1.2
5.0
May
3.4
2.2
2.9
4.0
4.1
3.8
7.9
9.4
8.7
6.7
7.9
8.8
8.8
5.0
4.4
5.4
1.9
5.0
5.9
June
6.4
7.4
5.5
5.1
9.9
8.1
0.8
8.5
7,3
9.6
8.8
9.2
8.9
8.4
7.4
7.9
9.1
8.8
7.3
7.9
7.4
7.6
8.1
7.8
July
7.4
4.6
7.7
6.9
10.0
10.9
11.5
8.7
7.4
10.2
8.6
10.6
6.3
6.6
9.0
15.5
8.6
Aug.
12.8
8.9
7.6
10.9
11.8
10.9
5.1
5.5
3.8
5.3
Sept.
6.8
5.6
7.4
7.3
5.5
3.8
3.7
5.0
5.3
7.9
B.8
9.6
10.3
7.1
7.3
6.5
8.8
5.4
6.6
Oct.
3.3
5.9
8.6
4.5
5.5
3.8
2.9
2.9
5.1
6.0
7.7
5.8
4.0
9.5
11.0
7.1
11.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
9.7
3.5
9.2
4.8
2.0
4.5
6.9
6.0
Nov.
8.7
4.4
6.1
5.6
5.6
11.2
11.7
9,4
8.7
7.5
13;;
12.6
11.5
7,9
12.6
10.7
9.3
6.5
.'
10.0
4.6
7.1
4.1
3.6
9.9
14.5
12.1
16.0
*-°
Dec.
7.3
10.0
8.8
12.2
11.4
7.2
13.2
10.6
5.0
4.5
3.2
5.6
6.2
t.o
12.7
9.7
14.1
8.6
PHILADELPHIA
OATF
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
3.9
6.0
U.I
8.3
4.3
4.8
3.4
1.3
1.6
1.6
1.3
3.9
4.0
2.2
1.1
1.2
3.0
2.6
5.3
5.9
8.0
6.7
3.5
2.8
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.4
Feb.
2.9
4.4
4.3
5.0
3.4
0.4
0.6
5.2
3.6
2.4
1.2
2.9
6.1
7.5
6.4
4.6
9.1
0.6
0.9
1.0
1.5
4.9
4.3
3.6
2.6
1.8
1.7
3.2
March
2.8
5.1
4.0
7.3
6.8
7.9
6.7
10.0
7.9
6.1
6.7
S.O
6.0
5.9
6.7
7.6
7.5
8.2
7.7
5.7
6.3
7.9
5.8
5.2
7.1
8.2
6.3
6.8
April
9.9
4.5
4.4
4.0
5.2
6.0
5.4
7.0
8.6
8.2
8.5
14.0
9.5
10.1
8.3
6.6
4.8
4.4
5.0
4.3
4.6
5.6
5.8
B.O
B.H
7.7
6.6
May
9.2
10.2
8.0
5.5
3.8
6.1
6.9
9.0
9.2
10.4
10.9
10.1
June
5.7
6.7
6.4
5.3
3.8
4.0
5.2
4.5
3.9
4.4
3.7
4.1
4.8
4.7
6.9
6.4
3.6
3.9
7.3
8.9
5.5
5.4
4.9
4.6
3.7
5.4
5.9
6.4
4.4
5.3
July
2.9
2.5
3.5
6.1
7.0
5.4
1.8
4.3
3.7
6.1
6.0
6.9
7.5
9.3
9.1
9.8
a.s
7.7
7.8
S.8
3.5
4.4
4.8
5.0
4.6
7.2
7.7
4.4
4.9
6.1
S.8
Aug.
7.3
11.1
8.8
6.7
6.4
4.5
6.5
6.2
7.8
8.1
7.1
6.5
7.9
10.0
10.1
10.8
9.4
8.3
7.2
7.3
8.4
13.8
9.5
9.4
8.4
4.9
4.9
5.2
5.8
4.5
7.7
Sept.
4.2
3.1
4.8
6.4
8.7
11.0
10.5
8.6
8.3
7.0
8.7
12.0
13.2
10.8
8.9
6.5
7.1
11.4
12.9
10.7
7.5
9.2
8.6
6.8
7.5
7.1
8.6
8.4
8.3
8.5
Oct.
9.5
12.2
10.7
9.5
7.1
4.1
5.5
5.6
6.2
7.6
10.3
11.8
10.1
6.3
8.6
8.0
10.1
6.7
9.4
7.1
8.9
8.4
7.9
8.0
9.3
7.6
10.2
14.0
10.6
8.6
Nov.
8.6
7.9
6.3
4.1
7.7
9.4
8.9
11.9
13.2
10.2
4.9
3.3
4.3
2.9
3.3
4.5
5.2
3.2
2.5
3 6
9?0
6.9
5.6
7.6
12.1
9.0
3.5
4.9
4.1
6.5
Dec.
4.1
6.0
3.9
5.0
6.5
6.3
7.1
10.6
15.3
4.2
5.9
8.3
6.9
6.5
3.7
3.2
4.5
6.0
11.2
U*
•* ,
B.7/
5.3'
4.6
6.5
6.4
6.0
5.6
3.7
2.2
4.0
6.3
134
-------
Table 6-7 (continued). CARBON MONOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
ST. LOUIS
BATE
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
10
12
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
25
27
26
2$
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
5.9
5.2
6.0
6.4
6.4
6.2
4.4
4.9
6.0
3.9
5.6
8.1
8 7
4.0
3.5
5.4
4.2
8.0
9.2
7.5
5.4
1 Q
8.0
5.2
4.6
5.0
5.1
6.5
6.3
7.4
7.7
6.0
Feb.
7.1
5.1
8.4
6.5
5.0
6.2
6.7
R.2
7 4
6.1
4 6
4.9
7.7
5.5
6.0
7.3
6.2
4.1
6.0
7.7
3«
%«
3.6
5.*
4.0
5.R
5.0
5.9
March
5.5
6.6
4.8
2.8
1.6
2.1
4.1
3.1
5.3
1.6
2.9
1.4
3.7
3.5
3.8
3.0
5.0
3.5
5.3
6.3
4.3
2.4
4.9
5.7
5.9
5.8
4.4
4.0
April
3."
3.0
5.2
3,»
4.2
2.4
3.»
3.9
2 i
3.5
5.7
4.0
3.0
3.2
3."
4.4
5.0
5.8
6./
3.1
5.1
5.6
4.9
6.1
7.3
4.B
4.3
4.4
May
6.4
5.1
7.0
5.6
6.1
5.6
4.6
5.2
6.8
5.8
4.0
5.1
5.8
5.4
6.5
5.0
4.7
5.6
8.1
7.3
8.2
7.0
2.3
0.9
5.6
June
3.4
4.2
6.0
3.0
3.9
5.7
5.2
5.3
3.2
3.7
6.1
5.1
5.6
8.5
4.2
2.7
7.0
6.0
6.1
9.1
7.6
5.1
July
4.6
3.1
4.6
3.2
6.0
6.2
6.2
5.3
6.3
5.3
5.0
6.1
5.6
6.3
6.5
7.6
5.9
8.4
3.7
6.0
6.0
6.2
5.3
5.6
4.1
2.9
4.6
5.3
Au9.
5.1
4.3
4.7
«.4
5.7
3.6
6.2
7.0
6.2
6.4
7.3
8.4
8.8
8.3
7.5
5.0
6.8
6.1
Sept.
8.2
8.3
4.0
5. a
5.8
5.3
6.3
4.0
3.9
7.7
8.3
5.3
8.0
6.9
5.1
5.1
6.9
5.7
8.4
7.5
5.3
5.9
7.6
6.8
6,3
Oct.
6.1
11.0
9.5
7.9
5.5
7.8
7.3
4.8
6.0
7.8
9.5
6,8
8.1
7.4
5.9
7.8
7.6
8.3
9.9
7.4
10.7
6,5
6.6
5.5
10.6
8.2
7.7
Nov.
9.0
8.9
6.8
8.0
5.0
8.0
6.9
7.2
5.7
4.0
4.4
4.9
6.2
4.2
2.9
4.3
6.6
6.7
4.1
6.9
5.1
3.2
3.7
6.1
6.6
4.7
5.7
Dec.
5.1
4.0
3.8
6.2
7.1
6.7
4.5
6.8
4.1
6.2
5.6
5.9
5.»
4.8
8.0
7.4
7.3
5.8
3.9
4.4
3.1
5.2
5.8
5.4
8.0
5.1
3.9
5.4
WASHINGTON
DATE
1
2
3
5
6
7
g
9
10
12
14
15
20
21
25
26
27
28
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
1.8
2.0
3.9
3.4
3.4
4.1
4.6
3.8
4.1
3.6
5.4
7.0
4.7
4.3
4.4
5.3
4.5
5.1
5.7
2.7
1,3
7.3
3.6
1.8
2.7
4.3
6.7
4.1
Feb.
9.6
4.2
2.5
3.1
2.7
1.9
1.7
4.0
6.5
3.1
3.2
2.4
3.4
4.1
4.2
2.1
2.1
3.1
2.9
4.3
3.4
2.8
3.3
3.2
4.4
2.9
3.5
March
3.4
3.9
4.0
4.8
3.9
4.1
3.2
3.8
4.9
4.6
3.8
2.2
4.4
2.8
3.2
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.2
2.5
2.8
3.5
3.0
2.3
2.2
2.5
3.3
3.7
3.6
4.1
3.3
April
4.5
5.1
3.2
?.8
3.8
4.4
3.6
2.6
2.3
2.8
2.3
2.1
2.0
2.9
2.1
4.6
3.9
J.8
5.9
3.1
3.1
"5.9
6.5
i.t
May
6.0
4.9
3.6
3.2
3.4
2.4
2.6
3.7
3.0
3.8
3.8
2.8
3.4
3.6
3.8
3.3
5.4
4.9
9.8
4.1
4.8
5.2
3.9
4.0
3.9
4.2
5.1
5.6
5.6
5.0
S.7
4.2
June
5.7
5.-i
5.3
4.6
4.1
3.9
3. ft
3.4
4.2
3.6
3.0
3.4
3.6
3.0
4.0
5.5
4.4
4.9
4.6
4.4
6.4
5.7
6.0
4.9
3.9
4.7
6.1
5.3
5.4
4.8-
4.6
July
5.3
5.2
4.5
2.6
5.3
6.9
5.2
5.4
5.2
5.1
6.1
5.7
4.9
s.a
3.9
3.8
6.3
S.3
4.9
5.8
7.5
7.2
5.7
6.1
6.2
5.1
6.2
5.8
5.1
4.6
5.3
5.4
Aug.
3.8
4.3
3.6
4.1
5.1
5.3
6.9
5.7
5.7
5.4
6.4
6.7
6.6
6.0
8.5
8.2
8.5
6.1
6.1
6.8
7.3
5.5
5.3
4.5
7.5
6.0
4.3
4.9
5.7
5.6
5.0
5.8
Sept.
8.4
8.8
9.5
8.7
8.9
6,9
6.0
5.7
4,8
3.3
4.4
5.7
8.0
9.3
6.1
3.6
3.6
4.9
4,5
4.2
1.7
5.9
4.4
5.6
6.0
5.7
5.5
4.6
4.4
5.8
Oct.
5.2
7.5
8.0
10.0
9.9
6.8
4.6
4.0
4.8
6.5
6.6
8.1
7.8
5.6
3.9
8.1
8.8
6.8
6.8
Nov.
4.8
5.3
5.2
5.4
9.6
12.0
5.2
3.6
4.3
5.2
4.7
5.2
6.0
5.4
4.8
4.8
5.1
7.5
5.0
6.7
8.0
14.6
11.3
6.8
8.2
7.8
4.7
Dec.
3.9
6.1
11.3
B.I
4.3
3.9
5.3
5.7
7.9
8.7
5.9
4.1
3.3
3.4
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.8
4.5
5.3
135
-------
Table 6-8. NITRIC OXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 19E7
(ppm)
CHICAGO
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.064
0.003
O.U<9
0.135
0.114
O.OM
O.O-'O
0.059
0.077
0.093
0.111
0.117
O.l»9
0.111
0.036
0.081
0.064
0.127
0.092
0.131
0.0»2
0.130
0.009
0.003
0.001
0.017
0.077
0.01".
Feb.
0.052
0.001
0.101
0.07S
0.0*7
0.077
0.085
0.102
0.009
0.042
0.042
0,096
0.081
0,099
0.006
0.079
0,072
0.00*
0.091
0.102
0.079
March
0.055'
0.142
0.105
0.086
0.080
0.097
".121
0.094
O.OB6
0.122
0.141
0.100
0.136
0.126
0.140
0.111
0.141
o.ua
0.078
0.097
O.OB8
0.111
0.112
0.085
0.115
0.074
0.075
0.111
0.104
0.028
0.054
0.101
April
0.137
0.070
0.170
0.113
0.08ft
0.103
0.10*
0.04"
0.07N
0.101
0.041
0.122
0.101
0.066
O.n52
0.026
0.053
1.122
O.U9
0.149
0.120
0.046
0.025
0.089
May
0.055
0.0)8
0.077
0.0»1
D.0'4
O.OhS
0.029
0.063
0.106
0.114
O.OW7
0.0*2
O.OF6
O.O'O
0.0«7
0.136
O.OV6
0.0*5
0.049
0.077
O.U61
O.OS6
0.058
0.063
0.073
0.039
0.048
0.046
O.O'O
0.034
0.060
o.ou
June
0.073
0.091
0.094
0.101
0.092
0.059
0.066
0.050
0.049
0.029
0.039
0.032
0.028
0.024
0.068
0.053
0.035
0.127
0.074
0.063
0.074
0.070
0.089
0.087
0.043
0.071
0.043
0.064
July
0.046
0.066
0.062
0.064
0.027
0,059
0.069
0.064
0.089
0,070
0.056
0.055
0.042
0.056
0.061
0.077
0.089
0.039
0.018
0.027
0.059
0,088
0.060
0.084
0.050
0.046
0.045
0.058
Aug.
0.040
0.047
0.067
0.102
0.100
0.067
0.062
0.062
0.079
0.119
0.085
0.148
0.132
0.106
0.097
0.050
0.031
0.050
0.096
O.OS2
0.055
0.041
0.044
0.069
0.091
0.072
0.059
0.123
0.080
0.077
0.070
0.076
Sept.
0.108
o.oso
0.018
0.008
0.017
0.133
0.068
0.113
0.061
0.059
0.061
0.076
0.046
0.068
0.044
0.049
0.029
0.074
0.055
0.060
0.055
0.092
0.094
0.095
0.063
Oct.
0.073
0.071
0.044
O.OS6
0.025
0.021
0.04?
0.062
0.064
0.073
0.066
0.086
0.069
0.062
0.062
0.065
0.097
0.057
0.082
0.044
0.038
0.025
0.043
0.076
0.082
0.077
0.029
0.089
0.091
0.061
Nov.
0.076
0.063
0.085
0.038
0.027
0.078
0.117
0.102
0.122
0.115
0.061
0.066
0.093
0.099
0.151
0.092
O.OB2
0.029
0.068
0.067
0.049
0.082
0.044
0.037
0.049
0.074
0.101
0.095
0.079
Dec.
0.063
0.077
0.061
0.059
0.072
0.147
0,084
0.128
0,155
0.123
0.117
0.071
0.080
0.136
0.099
0,106
0,067
0.083
0.116
0.080
0.077
0.044
0.070
0.081
0,064
0.100
0.165
0.125
0.127
0.099
0.071
0.094
CINCINNATI
DATE
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
U.013
0.026
0.016
0.024
0.029
0.046
0.020
0.023
0.029
0.023
0.0*4
0.016
0.015
0.03S
0.016
0.043
0.027
Feb.
0,103
0.020
0.021
0.021
0.010
0.010
0.01»
0.065
0.046
0.021
0.013
0.010
0.042
0.011
O.ftll
0.024
1,04"
0.031
0.029
0.014
0.018
0.017
0.01*
0.0?1
0.031
0.020
0.011
0,121
March
0.019
0.015
0.022
0.020
0.061
0.036
0.012
0.045
0.073
O.OS9
0.006
0.106
0.049
0.026
0.015
0.014
0.017
0.021
0.016
0.006
0.018
0.009
0.016
0.024
0.031
April
0,02*
0.011
o.ooo
0.015
0.040
1.024
1."14
0.010
0.027
0.002
0.003
0.017
0.015
O.P3H
1.055
O.OOR
0.011
0.111
0.010
0.019
n.010
0.111
0.011
0.006
0.012
0.129
0.091
1.054
0.109
0.022
May
O.U14
0.010
0.038
0.031
0.036
0.016
0.005
0.008
0.0"7
0.138
0.006
0.011
0.011
0.020
0.116
0.030
0.013
0.024
0.012
0.022
0.120
0.068
0.027
0.075
0.017
0.007
0.005
0.110
0.002
0.020
June
0.007
0.012
0.057
0.027
0.016
0.027
0.021
0.016
0.009
0.025
0.038
0.044
0.031
0.024
1.028
0.010
0.016
0.037
0.010
0.025
0.058
0.029
0.010
0.037
0.095
0.015
0.011
0.047
0.02R
July
0.024
0.008
0.014
0.018
0.019
0.010
0.013
0.013
0.020
0.022
0.033
0.042
0.040
0.026
0.046
0.038
0.039
0.014
0.013
0.011
0.017
0.035
0.011
0.018
0.019
0.019
0.028
0.023
Aug.
0.037
0.011
0.012
0.012
0.028
0.062
0.038
0.012
0.015
0.025
0.032
0.011
0.029
0.156
0.069
0.064
0.039
Sept.
0.037
0.121
0.358
0.353
0.074
0.066
0.097
0.069
0.014
0.002
0.008
0.010
0.017
0.028
0.063
0.035
0.049
0.014
0.026
0.013
0.020
0.058
0.026
0.027
0.018
0.014
0.064
Oct.
0.013
0.040
0.041
0,038
0.022
o.oie
0.011
0.018
0.029
0.036
0.138
0.067
0.066
0,060
0.027
0.028
0,009
0.027
0.012
0.011
0.019
0.021
0.037
0.033
0.051
0.032
0.03S
Nov.
0.035
0.037
0.038
0.029
0.034
0.050
0.108
0.025
0.028
0.01B
0.010
0.031
0.029
0.025
0.042
0.053
0.016
0.022
0.027
0.033
0.046
0.063
0.023
0.027
0.018
0.031
0.034
Dec.
0.018
0,031
0.036
0.077
0.087
0.065
0.026
0.046
0.059
0.051
0,026
0.028
0.035
0.032
0.055
136
-------
Table 6-8 (continued). NITRIC OXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
DENVER
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.03?
0.019
0.075
0.0^1
0.028
0.032
0.086
0.056
0.0*9
0.0*2
0.029
0.033
0.03*
0.051
0.06*
O.OBO
0.079
0.109
0.032
0.055
0.032
0.0**
0,077
0.069
0.055
0.0*3
0.0*9
0.0*1
0.053
Feb.
0.050
0.073
0,0*3
0.03*
0.017
0.039
0.027
0.05*
0.021
0.037
0.035
0.023
0,026
0.016
0.02*
0.029
0.031
0.036
0.0*3
0.033
0.025
0,021
0.051
0.079
0,0*5
0.0*2
0.042
0.037
March
0.0*9
0.066
0,032
0.021
0.017
0,050
0.051
0.0*5
0.0*7
0.059
0.059
0.057
April
0.015
0.023
0.031
0.022
0.012
O.Olf
0.017
0.020
0.020
0.022
0.019
0.012
0.01D
0.019
0.020
0.030
0,020
0.022
0,021
0.0*9
0.037
0.062
0.01"
0,023
May
0,013
0.037
0.033
0.026
0.019
0.021
0.020
0.027
0.020
0.033
0.022
0,031
0.01*
0.015
0.017
0.036
0.022
0.022
0.020
0.012
0.019
0.022
June
0.01*
0.019
0.02*
0.032
0.02*
July
0.020
0.032
Aug.
0,01*
0.021
0.023
0,016
0,015
0.016
0.018
0.027
0,021
0,022
0,022
0.010
0.01*
0.016
0.011
0.01*
0.019
0.03*
0.01*
0.020
0.018
Sept.
0.02*
0.015
0,026
0.02*
0.021
0.022
0.021
0.015
0.028
0.061
0.035
0.031
0.030
0.035
0,025
0.023
0.032
0.0*6
0.028
0.019
0.028
Oct.
0.010
0.013
0.038
0.018
0.015
0.019
0.010
0.095
0.061
0.030
0.072
0.037
0.031
0.020
0.0*0
0,030
0.02*
0.072
0,025
0.018
0.033
0.0*1
0.03*
NOV.
0.060
0.025
0.023
0.032
0.066
O.ll*
0.082
0.06*
0.035
0.033
0.031
0.059
0.028
0.036
0.009
0.013
0.072
0.059
0.0*6
Dec
0.032
0.056
0.037
0.0*0
0.115
0.07*
0.039
0.0**
0.027
0.030
0.077
0.078
0.017
0.063
0.13*
0.039
0.01*
0.077
0.026
0.005
0.000
0.079
0.059
O.lll
0.0*7
0.095
0.057
PHILADELPHIA
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.10*
0.028
0.326
0.071
0.067
0.087
0,107
0.091
0.138
0.066
0.081
0.176
0.106
0.076
0.060
0.102
0.0*7
0*098
0.077
0.082
0.161
0.150
0.212
0.135
0. 167
0.075
0.028
0,026
0.090
1.10*
Feb.
0.157
0.050
0.0*3
0.092
0.050
0.050
0.023
0.07*
0.097
0,0*5
0,072
0.023
0,076
0.051
0,059
0.05*
0.075
0.0*5
0.039
0,133
0.012
0.009
0.059 j
March
0.087
0.058
0.112
0.063
0.067
0.075
0.08*
0,079
0.012
0.075
0.064
0.056
0.022
0.015
0.012
0.016
0,097
0.072
0.032
0.079
0.037
0.032
0,069
0.080
0.070
0.058
0.058
April
0.071
0.011
0.063
0.136
0.058
0.017
0.019
0.050
0.021
0.037
0.023
0.03*
0.0*9
0.029
0,079
0,061
0.010
0.02*
0,0*3
0.0*0
0,020
0.053
0.033
0.015
0,015
0.018
0.037
0.039
0.040
May
0.022
0.0*3
0.021
0.039
0.037
0.0*8
0.035
0.033
0.038
0.037
0,05*
0,027
0,0*8
0.036
0,130
0.0*1
0.0*7
0.029
O.OZ7
0.02*
0.032
0.018
0.0*6
0.068
0.027
0.094
0.012
0.011
0.0*1
June
0.049
0.032
0.0*0
0.057
0.057
0.034
0.017
0.055
0.0*9
0.067
0.022
0.028
0.026
0.018
0.036
0.038
0.016
0.053
0.038
July
0.014
0.007
0.023
0.013
0.040
0.033
0.011
0.018
0,024
0.023
0.032
0.028
0.031
0.021
0.027
0.095
0.12*
0.018
0.028
0.026
0.052
0.026
0.019
0.006
0.02*
0.01*
0.030
0.013
0.016
0.013
0.0*1
0.029
Aug.
0.054
0.089
0.011
0.008
0.023
0.017
0.042
0,027
0.020
0.037
0.024
0.020
0.023
0.110
0.10*
0.063
0.060
0.030
0.019
0,02*
0.029
0,035
0.0*3
0.056
0.098
0.081
0.029
0.037
0.032
0.053
0.030
0.0*3
Sept.
0.038
0.030
0.033
0.036
0.056
0.0**
0,0*3
0.0*9
0.035
0.0**
0.0*5
0.062
0.098
0.140
0.042
0.019
O.OZ6
0.052
0.096
0.063
0.010
0.032
0.074
0.111
0.0*7
0.060
0.020
0.016
0.013
0.034
0.0*8
Oct.
0.105
0.160
0.060
0.08*
0.036
0.025
0.021
0.068
0.084
0.101
0.092
0.033
0.053
0.026
0.085
0.022
0.039
0.048
0.072
0.122
0.09*
0.1*4
0.054
0.088
0.124
0.066
0.097
0,138
0.1*7
0.079
Nov.
0.116
0.064
0.076
0.060
0.0*4
0.081
0.075
0.057
0.1*6
0.178
0.140
0.029
0.038
0.055
0.027
0.058
0.061
0.063
0.030
0.055
0.085
0.098
0.027
0.060
0.122
0,305
0.335
0.04*
0.072
0.109
0.090
Dec.
0.120
0.100
0.1*8
0,133
0.090
0.158
0.355
0.0*1
0.037
0.098
0.091
0.092
0.0*5
0.0*4
0.073
0.128
0.115
0.364
0.358
0.033
0.037
0.060
0.090
0.100
0.033
0.064
0.098
0.117
137
-------
Table 6-8 (continued). NITRIC OXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
ST. LOUIS
DATE
1
2
3
4
S
E
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0,054
0.041
0.026
O.OIS6
0.0*2
0.100
0.012
0.070
0.08*
0.075
0.013
0.065
0.016
0.0*0
0.0=3
0.078
O.OS2
0.031
0.076
0.030
0.028
0.032
0.010
0.028
U.0«3
0.077
0.100
0.0*1
Feb.
0.073
0,024 '
0,092
0,035
0.092
O.oai
0.026
0.01*
0.02°
0.090
0.068
0.02*
0.067
0.072
0.07B
0.025
O.Olt
0.139
0,027
0.03*
0.016
0.031
0.020
0.0*9
0.022
0.0*5
March
0,037
0.054
0.056
0,038
0.013
0,059
0,05*
0.062
0.063
0.013
0.005
0.0*5
0.0*5
0.01S
0.0*1
0.02*
0,025
0.007
0.0*1
0.011
0.039
0.03S
0.056
0.050
0.013
0.030
0.046
0.036
0.028
0,037
0.035
April
0.03*
0.011
".032
n.ojn
0.050
0.016
0.021
0.024
0.010
0.02*
O.D3«
0.045
0.032
0.01*
0.019
o.ni9
0.030
0.02*
0,037
0,006
0.006
0.02?
0.03*
0.019
0.021
0.085
0.014
0.007
0.026
May
o.nzi
0.005
0.04*
0.035
0.018
0.001
0.007
0.036
0.011
0.019
0,017
0.013
0.017
0.0*4
0.039
O.OM
0.013
0.022
0.009
0.0*8
0.027
0.03*
0.038
0.014
O.Oill
0.000
0.016
0.023
June
0.005
0.012
0.028
0.019
0.016
0.015
0.010
0.008
0.026
0.015
0.013
o.oia
0.022
0.00*
0.000
0.019
0.01*
0.006
0.018
0.045
0.026
0.011
0.068
0.03A
0.026
0.032
0.020
July
0.019
0.006
0.012
0.015
0.047
0.039
0.041
0.015
0.014
0.019
0.017
0.018
0.015
0.016
0.022
0.030
0.016
0.036
0.047
0.029
0.055
0.027
0.010
0.031
0.029
0.026
0.036
0.047
0.032
0.018
0.021
0.026
Aug.
0.029
0.018
0.028
0.016
0.035
0.017
0.014
0.040
0.017
0.032
0.032
0.021
0.019
0.042
0.040
0.041
0.038
0.035
0.009
0.026
0.030
0.012
0.024
0.027
0.010
0.009
0.077
0.039
0.029
0.040
0.028
Sapl.
0.050
0.038
0.013
0.022
0.033
0.017
0.020
0.033
0.006
0.015
0.030
0.0*8
0.030
0.017
0.038
0,021
0.022
0.044
0.031
0.033
0.017
0.040
0.029
0.012
0.039
0.037
0.029
0.017
0.029
0.033
0.028
Oct.
0.021
0.037
0.036
0.043
0.018
0.031
0.017
0.005
0.025
0.071
0.057
0.071
0.097
0.022
0.035
0.014
0.058
0.041
0.064
0.015
0.040
0.015
0,027
0.068
0.031
0.026
0.008
0,049
0.071
0.040
Nov.
0.056
0.059
0.025
0.019
0.009
0.073
0.068
0.081
0.083
0.006
0.037
0.0*0
0.047
0.050
0.026
0.013
0.060
0.065
0,074
0.043
0.021
0.081
0.073
0.034
0.023
0.097
0.059
0.043
0.049
Dec.
0.056
0.039
0.030
0.087
0.0*2
0.014
0,075
0.046
0.029
0.020
0.048
0.055
0.040
0.031
0.043
0.037
0.061
0.125
0.089
0.054
0.019
0.037
0.061
0.017
0.065
0.056
0.054
0.085
0.016
0.016
0.048
WASHINGTON
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.061
0.069
0.120
0.093
0.051
0.083
0.081
0.058
0.07*
0.127
0.026
0.079
0.133
0.055
0.0*4
0.027
0.054
0.032
0.091
0.110
0.031
0.173
0.093
0.137
0.048
0.008
0.005
0.045
0.197
0.076
Feb.
0.359
0.042
0.030
0,038
0.017
0.100
0.250
0.047
0.028
0.023
0.09P
0,094
0.048
0.006
0.050
0.081
0.042
0.043
0.023
O.OIB
0.040
0.014
0.066
March
0,019
0.0*6
0.021
0.023
0.028
0.087
0.040
0.050
0.090
0.069
0.033
0.007
0.027
0.048
0.026
0.015
0.018
0.011
0.018
0.0*2
0.053
0.028
0.035
0.029
0.031
0.037
0.014
0.023
0.025
0.021
0.017
0.033
April
0.01»
0.059
o.oa*
0.010
0.041
0.074
0.017
0.002
0.015
0.01*
0.075
0.098
0.010
0,012
0,017
0,032
0.071
0.018
0.02*
0.033
0.06B
0.03*
May
0.022
0.022
0.014
O.OZ5
0.019
0.030
0.008
0.044
0.027
0.056
0.078
0.021
0.064
0,034
0,027
0.007
0.081
0.050
0.026
0.011
0.014
0.044
0.016
0.019
O.plS
0.011
0.017
0.018
0.016
0.009
0.036
0.028
June
0.039
0.015
0.046
0.012
0.036
0.02!
0,017
0.014
0.016
0.013
0.006
0.024
0.012
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.012
0.005
0.041
0.015
0.015
0.004
0.001
0.003
0.030
0.012
0.010
0.013
0.017
July
0.014
0.003
0.013
0.007
0.016
0.060
0.004
0.018
0.013
0.010
0.019
0.013
0.007
0.022
0.014
0.003
0.032
0.014
0.029
0.020
0.026
0.028
0.008
0.014
0.012
0.008
0.008
0.016
0.019
0.006
0.027
0.016
Aug.
0.011
0.038
0.018
0.021
0.022
0.022
0.063
0.032
0.016
0.015
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.026
0.116
0.053
0.088
0.018
0.015
0.026
0.033
0.024
0.019
0.017
0.060
0.031
0.013
0.010
0.018
0.023
0.015
0.029
Sept.
0.023
0.042
0.071
0.023
0.050
0.016
0.023
0.013
0.010
0.014
0.041
0.078
0.089
0.106
0.030
0.007
0.026
0.070
0.060
0.061
0.014
0.015
0.015
0.009
0.047
0.047
0.019
0.012
0.018
0.010
0.035
Oct.
0.024
0.073
0.061
0.092
0,069
0,030
0.025
0.006
0.020
0.033
0.036
0.092
0.085
0.038
0.040
0.038
0.064
0.016
0.023
0.061
0.041
0.081
0.165
0.098
0.021 ,
0.084
0.069
0,024
0.096
0.121
0.196
0.062
Nov.
0.078
0.064
0.056
0.025
0.002
0.036
0.033
0.050
0.161
0.020
0.037
0.020
0.037
0.058
0.032
0.015
0.027
0.052
0.101
0.028
0.076
0.118
0.309
0.184
0.036
0.095
0.065
0.066
Dec.
0.076
0.220
0.057
0.101
0.285
0.171
0.122
0.226
0.168
0.030
0.099
0.227
0.167
0.035
0.032
0.078
0.114
0.131
0.228
0.149
0.036
0.016
0.02S
0.062
0.032
0.054
0.058
0.025
0.052
0.041
0.102
138
-------
Table 6-9. NITROGEN DIOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
CHICAGO
DOTE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1B
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.047
0.0*7
0.045
0.0*2
0.020
0.046
0.047
0.047
o.o*a
0.025
0.014
0.037
0.052
0.039
0.040
0.037
0.022
0.041
Feb.
0.020
0.045
0.048
0.042
0.037
0.049
0.047
0.054
0.055
0.041
0.037
0.041
0.044
0.053
0.03"
0.040
0.051
0.049
0.055
0.061
0.040
0.036
0.041
0.045
0.042
0.042
0.045
March
0.040
0.057
0.050
0.041
0.036
0.05S
0.049
0.050
0.083
0.059
0.050
0.047
0.053
0.056
0.061
0.054
0.064
0.068
0.072
0.070
0.081
6.071
0.055
0.081
0.067
0.054
0.066
0.066
0,074
0.056
0.060
April
0.053
0.049
0.059
0.063
0.087
0.057
0.052
0.07'
0.073
0,064
0.082
0.101
0.072
0.06"
0.087
0.091
0.037
0.018
0.02*
O.P40
0.044
0.037
0.056
O.OO
n.061
0.05'
0.076
O.oaf.
0,067
0.080
0.062
May
0.0«9
0.04J
0.053
0.049
0.058
0.062
0.045
0.047
O.U64
0.049
O.U44
0.066
0.064
0.0!>7
0.073
O.O'O
0.062
0.049
0.043
0.061
O.OM
0.059
0.0*2
0.098
O.OH7
0.062
0.092
0.090
0.0»1
U.OS2
0.059
June
0,056
0.076
0.099
0.109
0.088
0.067
0.060
0.052
0.052
0.053
0.064
0.068
0.064
0.029
0.032
0.040
0.081
0.050
0.075
0.052
0.057
0.087
0.091
0.061
0.064
0.061
0.065
July
0.054
0.051
0.050
0,047
0.040
0.039
0.049
0.033
0.026
0.032
0.030
0.052
0.057
0.061
0.057
0.047
0.067
0.067
0.045
0.051
0.059
0.063
0.063
0.038
0.058
0.064
0.048
0.050
AUO.
0.061
0.078
0.069
0.054
0.072
0,063
0.058
0.055
0.052
0.030
0.040
0.058
0.095
0.074
0.061
0.055
0.027
0.043
0.046
0.030
0.042
0.038
0.087
0.049
0.026
0.061
0.067
0.032
0.033
0.053
Sept.
0.044
0.039
0.026
0.079
0.000
0.114
0.035
0.040
0.044
0.039
0.046
0.034
0.030
0.020
0.018
0.029
0.024
0.034
0.020
0.019
0.028
0.042
0.040
Oct.
0.055
0.043
0.049
0.036
0.033
0.024
0.019
0.015
0.022
0.024
0.026
0.041
0.044
0.053
0.036
0.033
0.038
0.029
0.040
0.025
0.021
0.029
0.043
0.029
0.017
0.024
0.025
0.028
0.030
0.044
0.034
0.032
Nov.
0.035
0.027
0.039
0,034
0.059
0,072
0.063
0.035
0.045
0.031
0.021
0.034
0.023
0.023
0.025
0.023
0.023
0.031
0.044
0.036
Dec.
0.026
0.025
0.027
0.046
0.030
0.035
0.03*
0.040
0.036
0.033
0.030
0.016
0.033
0.036
0.034
0.035
0.032
0.040
0.049
0.047
0.034
CINCINNATI
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.028
0.037
0.043
0.035
0.023
0.034
0.028
0.035
0.036
0.039
0.036
0.038
0.037
0.020
0. 018
0.023
0.019
0.024
0.030
0.031
0,027
0,026
0,024
0,025
0,027
0.026
0.020
0 021
0.029
0.024
0.034
Feb.
0.035
0.027
0.074
0.023
0.032
0.031
0.051
0.040
0.032
0.026
0.023
0.022
0.032
0.032
0.023
0.019
0.025
0.037
0,031
0.028
0,030
0.030
0.026
0.022
0.025
•0.020
0.02"!
0.026
0.029
March
0.030
0.029
0.027
0.024
0.029
0.036
0.029
0.041
0.048
0.049
0.026
0.043
0.044
0.030
0.028
0.022
0.032
0.034
0.029
0.049
0.057
0.052
0.032
0.032
0.036
April
0.034
0.022
0.018
0.03?
0.044
0.042
0.027
0.031
0.025
0.023
0.033
0.031
n.01«
0.020
0.030
0.021
0.022
0.023
0.024
0.027
0.025
0.023
0.018
0.017
0.024
0.031
0.041
0.044
0.026
0.028
May
0.028
0.046
0.026
0.028
0.027
0.028
0.011
0.017
0.036
3.015
0.012
0.023
0.023
0.018
0.023
0.032
0.037
0.025
0.017
0.026
0.036
0.026
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.030
0.024
0.012
0.026
June
0.026
0.018
0.02R
0.022
0.027
0.024
0.032
0.030
0.028
0.028
0.029
0.028
0.019
0.031
0.026
0.018
0.024
0.021
0.015
0.020
0.030
0.026
0.035
0.025
0.025
0.051
0.026
July
0.037
0.029
0.038
0.015
0.017
0.022
0.019
0.025
0.027
0.037
0.030
0.035
0.029
0.040
0.027
0.026
0.021
0.025
0.033
0.023
0.023
0.022
0.025
0.022
0.027
Aug.
0.028
0.020
0.018
0.019
0.031
0.020
0.034
0.033
0.028
0.041
0.026
0.037
0.044
Sept.
0.029
0.028
0.035
0.032
0.036
0.043
0.048
0.035
0.022
0.019
0.028
0,022
0.022
0.037
0.047
0.069
0.042
0.056
0.058
0.037
0.024
0.023
0.030
0.032
0,013
0.011
0.034
Oct.
0.026
0.029
0.031
0.031
0.033
0.019
0.022
0.020
0.017
0.025
0.028
0.030
0.030
0.024
0.024
0.033
0.027
0.026
0.023
0.023
0.021
0.024
0.035
0.030
0.017
0.019
0.021
0.025
0.024
0.033
0.032
0.026
Nov.
0.023
0.028
0.01S
0.023
0.015
0.022
0.025
0.036
0.028
0.040
0.032
0.017
0.024
0.026
0.031
0.032
0.031
0.016
0.021
0.025
0.028
0.026
0.020
0.020
0.024
0.026
0.025
0.028
0.031
0.035
0.026
Dec.
0.030
0.030
0.026
0.030
0.031
0.035
0.030
0.028
0.026
0.030
0.023
0.023
0.030
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.027
0.026
0.043
0.026
0.017
0.017
0.014
0.021
0.026
0.027
0.021
0.024
0.021
0.026
199
-------
Table 6-9 (continued). NITROGEN DIOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
DENVER
DATE
1
2
3
5
g
y
g
g
10
f •]
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
"22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.035
0.032
0.040
0.038
0.028
0.035
0.039
0.045
0.041
0.038
0.032
0.036
0.034
0.047
0.025
0.040
0.042
0.044
0.043
0.065
0.025
0.030
0.027
0.026
0.066
0.043
0.040
0.033
0.033
0.029
0.038
Feb.
0.034
0.041
0.036
0.030
0.018
0.030
0.029
0.037
0.024
0.026
0,030
0.015
0.025
0.025
0.030
0.036
0.040
0.030
0.035
0.03;
0.027
0.023
0.042
0.054
0.035
0.041
0.036
0.032
March
0.047
0.051
0.032
0.025
0.027
0.044
0.063
0.048
0.059
0.038
0.039
0.055
0.035
0.036
0.037
0.032
0.047
0.035
0.042
April
0.021
0.015
0.026
0.026
0.037
0.026
0.017
0.026
0.018
0.02Z
0.021
0.035
0.035
0.032
0.036
0.016
0.016
0.020
0.023
0.014
0.037
0.026
0.041
0.029
0.017
0.010
0.024
May
0.029
0.022
0.016
0.019
0.020
0.029
0.021
0.019
June
0.025
0.026
0.020
0.024
0.012
July
0.017
0.044
0.038
0.049
0.049
0.041
0.043
Aua.
0.034
0.046
0.045
0.043
0.038
0.045
0.037
0.048
0.035
0.042
0.050
0.052
0.009
Sept.
0.037
0.037
0.049
0.038
0.038
0.037
0.028
0.023
0.031
0.043
0.042
0.028
0.040
0.042
0.046
0.048
0.046
0.038
0.054
0.054
0.030
0.050
0.050
0.041
0.041
Oct.
0.025
0.030
0.024
0.031
0.031
0.028
0.024
0.028
0.022
0.043
0.049
0.048
0.039
0.072
0.050
0.068
0.031
0.034
0.028
0.050
0.048
0.038
Nov.
0.045
0.034
0.052
0.056
0.040
0.067
0.049
0.044
0.054
0.044
0.056
0.040
0.035
0.046
0.048
0.029
0.033
0.029
0.055
0.040
0.040
0.024
0.031
0.055
0.081
0.045
Dec.
0.038
0.059
0.065
0.059
0.068
0.052
0.059
0.037
0.036
0.053
0.038
0.077
0.068
0.033
0.029
0.032
0.023
0.026
0.047
0.047
0.091
0.049
0.048
PHILADELPHIA
DATE
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
IS
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.038
0.045
0.082
0.083
0.046
0.042
0.045
0.040
0.047
0.093
0.034
0.036
0,063
0.049
0.042
0.038
0.047
0.032
0.049
0.062
0.048
0.078
0.065
0.075
0.068
0.093
0.037
0.034
0.034
0.036
0.047
0.051
Feb.
0.054
0.047
0.035
0.054
0.042
0.046
0.066
0.071
0.049
0.029
0.046
0.064
0.072
0.049
0.047
0.079
0.057
0.040
0.046
0.051
0.034
0.019
0.013
0.027
0.023
0.047
March
0.021
0.045
0.054
0.053
0.041
0.041
0.040
0.060
0.068
0.087
0.082
0.033
0,045
0.046
0.039
0.036
0.042
0.03S
0.048
0.068
0.059
0.053
0.059
0.052
0.037
0.049
0.056
0.069
0.066
0.051
April
0.081
0.095
0.059
0.040
0.075
0.079
0.040
0.041
0.051
0.051
0.031
0.069
0.076
0.058
0.045
0.034
0.029
0.044
0.065
0.057
0.037
0.047
0.036
0.041
0.051
0,037
0.043
0.060
0.053
May
0.089
0.079
0.033
0.030
0.038
0.030
0.027
0.028
0.023
0.036
0.053
0.037
0.045
0.049
0.075
0.062
0.072
0.047
0.043
0.052
0.050
0.043
0.035
0.049
0.059
0.054
0.044
0.034
0.047
June
0.065
0.067
0.060
0.050
0.055
0.059
0.047
0.053
0.054
0.066
0.059
0.059
0.050
0.068
0.073
0.043
0.031
0.041
0.037
0.041
0.048
0.059
0.063
0.053
0.031
0.055
0.066
0.044
0.033
0.053
July
0.035
0.026
0.043
0,033
0.040
0.047
0.047
0.041
0.032
0.054
0.055
0.048
0.056
0,052
0.037
0.050
0.069
0.065
0.033
0.038
0.049
0.060
0.030
0.056
0.043
0.072
0.041
0.041
0.042
0.063
0.047
Au0.
0.056
0.049
0.029
0.028
0.040
0.035
0.050
0.035
0.035
0.026
0.028
0.026
0.045
0.058
0.071
0.068
0.053
0.032
0.034
0.045
0.042
0.038
0.030
0.032
0.051
0.027
0.033
0.041
0.052
0.029
0.041
Sept.
0.021
0.024
0.024
0.032
0.045
0.048
0.048
0.041
0.044
0.027
0.033
0.026
0.069
0.054
0.034
0.014
0,033
0.050
0.048
0.056
0.022
0.019
0.02Z
0.031
0.024
0.033
0.027
0.015
0.017
0.023
0.033
Oct.
0.025
0.042
0.063
0.025
0.020
0.023
0.024
0.022
0.032
0.038
0.039
0.029
0.045
0.018
0.018
0.032
0.034
0.028
0.043
0.044
0.031
0.024
0.033
0.023
0.028
0.046
0.047
0.032
Nov.
0.028
0.023
0.031
0.024
0.021
0.024
0.022
0.024
0.049
0.042
0.040
0.031
0.017
0.025
0.017
0.022
0.028
0.024
0.017
0.019
0.024
0.035
0.021
0.022
0.024
0.051
0.043
0.016
0.024
0.028
0.027
Dec.
0.029
0.037
0,025
0.022
0.036
0.030
0.032
0.028
0.040
0.018
0.021
0.023
0.028
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.025
0.036
0.031
0.058
0.070
0.026
0.019
0.020
0.029
0.029
0.034
0.037
0.024
0.034
0.036
0.031
-------
Table 6-9 (continued). NITROGEN DIOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES , 1967
(ppm)
ST. LOUIS
DATE
1
2
3
4
e
t
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.027
0.034
0.027
0.035
0.027
0.028
0.026
0,026
0.033
0.027
0.029
0.037
0.03b
U.032
0.02*
0.029
0.024
0.032
0.0*1
0.039
0.035
0.032
0.034
0.021
U.024
0.023
0.027
0.036
0.037
0.035
0.046
0.031
Feb.
0.07.5
0.02!)
0.027
0.020
n,025
0.023
0.036
0.044
0.031
0.037
0.020
0.023
1.041
0.043
0.023
n.021
0.077
0.02''
0.025
o.oi*
O.OZl
0.01*
8.01'
0.011
0.0?«
0.021
0.026
n.0?a
0.02'
March
0.028
0.042
0.037
0.031
0.023
0.024
0.042
0.034
0.043
0.060
0.041
0.029
0.040
0.026
0.02$
0.036
0.030
0,038
0.031
0.040
0.028
0.043
0^043
0.035
O.OZB
0.025
0.019
0.032
0.032
0.030
0.031
0.034
April
0,034
0.022
0.01*
0.020
0.017
0,012
0.022
0.022
0,024
1.022
0,027
0,028
0.022
n.03l
0.024
0,010
0.91"
n.oi<)
"."27
0.1132
0.032
n.oi*
0,013
0.021
0.32*
0.027
n.026
0.029
n.12**
n.nl»
0.023
May
0,027
0.018
0.042
0.032
0.024
0.017
0.018
0.023
0.031
U.022
0.02Z
0.014
o.uu
0.014
0.019
0.029
0.022
0.0«9
0,006
O.U(>4
0.109
0.012
O.J13
0.025
0.029
0.014
0.110
0.004
0.008
0.013
0.018
June
0.001
0.030
0.018
0.000
0.013
0.023
0.021
0.021
0.024
0.019
0.019
0.031
0.030
0.033
0.033
0.022
0.001
0.012
0.035
0.026
1.010
0.024
0.039
0.022
0.014
0.033
0.035
0.033
0.053
0.023
July
0.033
0.015
0.021
0.016
0.023
0.050
0.043
0.031
0.016
0.023
0.032
0,029
0.012
0.018
0.019
0.019
0.022
0.032
0.051
0.042
0.055
0.025
0.020
0.033
0.034
0.036
0.029
0.035
0.031
0.021
0.023
0.029
Aug.
0,027
0.026
0.024
0.017
0.031
0,022
0.02B
0.024
0.018
0.016
0.021
0.026
0.028
0.036
0.036
0,036
0.033
0.024
0.009
0.015
0.016
0.019
0.01R
0.026
O.OZB
0.04H
0.036
0.027
0.026
Sept.
0.031
0.034
0.034
0.035
0.032
0.036
0.042
0.026
0.015
0.026
0.030
0.021
0.019
0.026
0.020
0.023
0.027
0.025
0.027
0.021
0.023
0.026
0.016
0.026
0.025
0.011
0.015
0.025
0.021
0,026
Oct.
0.029
0.036
0.032
0.029
o.oia
0.019
0.016
0.006
0.015
0.009
0.028
0.022
0.035
0.039
0.022
0.019
0.029
0.022
0.029
0.026
0.030
0.021
0.034
0.021
0.014
0.021
0,013
0.016
0.013
0.022
0,016
0.023
Nov.
0.018
0.014
0.015
0.016
0.012
0.024
0.026
O.OZ3
0.020
0.025
0.021
0,018
0.014
0.019
0.020
0.025
0.027
0.016
n.025
0.025
0.045
0.016
0.016
0.027
0.027
0.024
0.016
0.016
0.014
0.015
0.021
Dec.
0.011
0.013
0.012
0.016
0.020
0.018
0.011
0.020
0.011
0.010
0.005
0.014
0.013
O.OOB
0.009
0.013
0.012
0.015
0.017
0.013
0.004
0.016
0.014
0.018
0.016
0.024
0.021
0. 023
0.030
0.010
0.017
0.015
WASHINGTON
DATE
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.036
0.047
0.058
0.035
0.027
0.045
0.077
0.046
0.054
0.053
U.062
0.059
0.067
0.035
0.027
0.026
0.033
0.060
1.046
Feb.
0.087
0.044
O.OJ9
0.045
0.037
0.037
0.034
0.061
0.074
0.046
0.041
0.020
0.056
0.062
0.046
0.072
0.034
0.059
0.045
n.040
1.03"
0.039
0.046
0.032
0.027
O.PT
0.05"
1.034
0.044
March
0.034
0,055
0.059
0.050
0.026
0.031
0.037
0.069
0.070
0.068
0.053
0.035
0.035
0.056
0.044
0.033
0,040
0.058
0.054
0.051
0.054
0.060
0,057
0,036
0.037
0.048
0.057
0.054
0.049
April
0,161
0.072
0.051
0,044
0,05'
0.066
0.048
0.035
0.031
0.043
0."66
0,084
0.059
0.080
0.051
o.na-i
0.037
0,04«
0.054
May
0.0»4
0.040
0.038
0.045
0.047
0.040
0.027
0.048
0.031
0.037
0.056
0.041
0.046
0.038
0.035
0.037
0.069
0.0!>3
0.060
0.046
0.046
0.053
O.O^'O
0.047
0.045
0.0*8
O.OSS
0.068
0.062
0.035
0.057
0.047
June
0.064
0.077
0.079
0.047
0.056
0.043
0.038
0.044
0.049
0.045
0.034
0.093
0.047
0.033
0.048
O.P45
0.035
0.035
0.035
0.049
o.oaa
0.040
0.055
0.045
0.032
0.034
0.066
0.053
0.042
0.046
0.048
July
0.041
0.047
0.059
0.068
0.033
0.027
0.028
0.039
0.042
0.038
0.038
0.045
0.035
0.029
0.054
0.048
0.052
0.033
0.041
0.040
0,032
0.033
0.032
0.036
0.047
0.045
0.043
0.027
0.049
0.040
Aug.
0.030
0.041
0.029
0,027
O.OZ7
0.044
0.030
0.019
0.029
0.022
0.020
O.OZ7
0.021
0.041
0.054
0.054
0.039
0.042
0.039
0.039
0.024
0.030
0.028
0,046
0,042
0.027
0.022
0.035
0.037
0.018
0.033
Sept.
0.017
0.030
0.034
0.033
0.047
0.049
0.049
0.043
0.032
0,028
0.029
0.046
0.045
0.052
0.039
0.021
0.026
0.038
0.038
0.056
0.027
0.024
0.019
0.015
0.028
0.043
0.031
O.OZ4
O.OZ3
0.022
0.033
Oct.
O.OZ7
0.046
0.068
0.054
0.056
O.OZ7
O.OZ3
0.025
0.032
0.021
0.034
0.041
0.054
0.043
0.030
0.033
0.040
0.026
0,029
0.046
0.039
0.031
0.055
0.048
O.OZ7
0.032
0.041
0.061
0.083
0.040
Nov.
0.057
0.038
0,040
0.031
0.028
0.042
0,057
0,075
0.035
0.046
0.043
0,049
0.051
0.036
O.OZ4
0.026
0.038
0.046
0.026
0.026
0.037
0.061
0.053
O.OZ5
0.047
0.044
0.042
Dec.
0.045
0.071
0.037
0.035
0.067
0.059
0.064
0.059
0.046
O.OZ4
0.039
0.046
0.055
0.041
0.023
0.018
0.040
0.038
0.047
0.037
0.020
0.019
0.017
0.030
O.OZO
0.035
n.041
0.036
0.041
0.025
0.039
-------
Table 6-10. SULFUR DIOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(pom)
CHICAGO
D4TF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.3B6
0.322
0.2*7
0.481
0.424
0.47*
0.262
0.133
0.157
0.32S
0.400
0.420
0.392
0.143
0.293
0.170
0.159
0.120
0.280
0.2*2
0.182
0.094
0.27B
0.274
Feb.
0.33ft
0.339
0.264
0.142
0.141
0.221
0.6>>4
0.377
U.333
0.204
0.391
U.416
0.538
0.190
U.423
0.267
0.220
0.277
0.197
0.359
0.380
0.290
0.232
0.335
0.278
0.346
0.349
0.317
March
0.238
0.380
0.298
0.055
0.109
0.210
0.288
0.388
0.401
0.285
0.192
0.175
0.224
0.203
0.258
0.269
0.170
0.145
0.165
0.386
0.037
0.128
0.052
0.041
0.082
0.042
0.051
0.079
0.191
April
0.067
0.16*
0.045
0.130
0,071
0.042
0.033
0.062
0.027
O.n2«
0.047
0.023
0.033
0.10)
0.042
0.035
0.04'
0.021
0.00"
0.044
0.06'
0.02*
0.031
0.130
0.142
0.076
0.092
0.048
0.031
O.t'lZ
0.054
May
0.105
O.OJ7
0.0*6
0.021
0.019
0.014
0.031
0.022
0.081
o.n»o
0.047
0.021
0.021
0.014
0.049
0.129
0.102
0.2»7
0.045
0.047
0.0'2
o.on
O.OV9
0.0X9
0.060
0.169
0.075
0.015
0.033
0.016
0.028
0.0*0
June
0.040
0.053
0.087
0.101
0.063
0.086
0.074
0.101
0.112
0.051
0.041
0.085
0.094
0.151
0.202
0.141
0.054
0.028
0.032
0.034
0.113
0.034
0.105
0.019
0.024
0.056
0.068
0.037
0.057
0.041
0.072
July
0.070
0.016
0.021
0.013
0.007
0.013
0.014
0.050
0.054
0.016
0.044
0.019
0.020
0.011
0.001
0.021
0.052
0.121
0.002
0.001
0.103
0.125
0.066
0.025
0.036
0.100
0.062
0.007
0,072
0.017
0.011
0.039
Aug.
0.019
0.044
0.090
0.027
0.051
0.063
0.033
0.032
0.015
0.017
0.008
0.029
0.033
0.121
0.147
0,079
0.160
0.046
0.022
0.036
0.100
0.016
0.027
0.027
0.044
0.050
0.010
0.061
0.194
0.023
0.012
0.052
Sopt.
0.008
0.002
0.001
0.008
0.000
0.004
0.000
0.055
0.022
0.074
0.011
0.034
0.028
0.012
0.007
0.011
0.051
0.143
0.017
0.003
0.121
0.027
0.096
0.086
0.020
0.029
0.084
0.080
0.037
Ocl.
0.104
0.178
0.149
0.149
0.014
0.009
0.045
0.022
0.058
0,087
0.132
0.109
0.137
0.099
0.044
0.008
0.018
0.042
0.109
0,073
0.067
0.054
0.059
0.165
0.131
0.139
0.143
0.144
0.078
0.088
Nov.
0.183
0.174
0.192
0.091
0.080
0,274
0.274
0.277
0,147
0.139
0.151
0.055
0.126
0.149
0.203
0.311
0.191
0.084
0.123
0.173
0.262
0.132
0,144
0.308
0.196
0.150
0.103
0.142
0.293
0.087
0.174
Dec.
0.150
0.139
0.202
0.364
0.213
0.152
0.189
0.170
0.044
0.061
0.171
0.191
0.131
0.233
0.162
0.256
0.154
0.179
0.126
0.230
0.161
0.125
0.249
0.259
0.217
0.235
0.369
0.221
0.440
0.326
0.221
0.206
CINCINNATI
OATg
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.014
a. on
0.025
1.030
0.02?
0.028
0,024
0,030
0.039
0.045
0.049
0.040
0.045
0.013
0.010
0.040
0.016
0.013
0.035
0.056
0.012
0.025
0.019
0.045
0.037
0.029
0.024
0.021
0.013
0.013
0.052
0.029
Feb.
0.03*
0.022
0.018
0.01"
0.015
0.019
0.035
0.056
0.050
0.048
0.011
0.021
0.0147
0.034
0.034
0.01*
0.033
0.044
0.035
0,031
0.030
0.026
0.021
0.017
0.017
0.031
0.026
0.022
0.030
March
0.022
0.026
0.010
0.003
0.019
0.022
0.039
0.045
0.052
0.059
0.018
0.013
0.046
0.037
0.018
0.014
0.004
0.008
0.004
0.001
0.003
0.009
0.007
0.019
0.009
0.008
0.014
0.024
0.042
0.033
0.021
April
0.030
0.021
0.024
0.033
0.022
0.022
0.017
O.OQ7
0.00"
0.009
0.050
0.017
0.011
0.014
P. 008
0.019
0.013
0.023
0.025
0.005
O.OQ7
0.005
0.011
0.024
0.040
0.026
0.022
0.022
0.010
0.01*
May
0.019
0.018
0.040
0.015
0.016
0.024
0.021
0.041
0.022
0.013
0.026
0.019
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.053
0.037
0.015
0.012
0.012
0.011
0.019
0.028
0.027
0.008
0.010
0.015
0.017
0.021
June
0.032
0.032
0.028
0.017
0.017
0.015
0.019
0.044
0.021
0.018
0.005
0.016
0.027
0.022
0.022
0.024
0.021
0.009
0.018
0.014
0.023
0.008
0.025
0.021
0.005
0.017
0.021
0.030
0.023
0.016
0.020
July
0.014
0.009
0.011
0.011
0.017
0.012
0.027
0.017
0.020
0.014
0.020
0.030
0.032
0.001
0.015
0.013
0.021
0.028
0.022
0.020
0.017
0.022
0.015
0.023
0.017
0.024
0.030
0.018
0.013
0.024
0.018
Aug.
0.019
0.015
0.026
0.014
0.010
0.009
Sept.
Oct.
0.011
0.010
0.008
0.003
Nov.
0.006
0.009
0.022
0.009
0.017
0.013
0.020
0.027
0.022
0.009
o.on
0.003
0.015
Dec.
0.007
0.000
0.001
0.006
0.000
''
142
-------
Table 6-10 (continued). SULFUR DIOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES , 1967
(ppm)
DENVER
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.004
0.011
0.013
0.011
0.014
0,012
0.024
0.011
0.003
0.007
0.001
0.000
0.006
0.001
0.002
0.010
0.008
0.011
0.016
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.013
0.019
0.015
0.014
0,012
0.022
0.010
Feb.
o.oio
0.003
0.003
0,006
0,010
0.013
0.000
0,006
0.001
0.000
0,002
0.005
0.001
0.011
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.020
0.007
0.009
0.006
0.006
March
0.014
0.012
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.018
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0,006
0.001
0.000
0.002
0,003
April
0.000
0.003
0.000
0.001
0.002
0,000
0.001
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
o.ooo
0.001
0.001
0.001
0,001
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
o.ooo
0.002
0,003
0,000
0.000
0,001
May
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0,000
0,002
0,000
0.002
0.000
0,001
0,002
0.000
0,001
0,000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
June
0.000
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0,000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0,000
0.002
0.003
0.001
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.000
0.001
July
0.000
0.004
0.011
0.012
0.017
0,009
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
Aug.
0,000
0,000
0.001
0.000
0.009
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.004
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.007
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.000
0.000
0,002
Sept.
0,000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.001
0,001
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.006
0,000
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0,003
0.006
0.000
0.003
0.003
0.002
Oct.
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.017
0.021
0.006
0.005
0.014
0.007
0.013
0.007
0.001
o.ooa
0.006
0.002
0.007
Nov.
0.001
0.005
0.007
0,004
0.009
0.012
0.007
0.011
0.009
0.013
0.012
0.008
0.008
0.010
0.010
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.000
0.001
0.005
0.013
0.005
O.OOB
0.007
Dec.
0.005
0.002
0.015
0.019
0.031
0.019
0.022
0,024
0.041
0,039
0.040
0.044
0.044
0.051
0.034
0.029
0,022
0.026
0.029
0.027
0.023
0.029
0.040
0.069
0.030
PHILADELPHIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0,082
0.03S
0.229
0.279
0.330
0,151
0,058
0,038
0,208
Feb.
0.230
0,324
0,047
0,119
0,269
0.128
0.100
0.101
0.154
0.157
0.058
0.099
0.174
0.079
0.057
0.042
0.118
0.132
0.134
March
0.032
0.146
0.230
0.011
0.094
0.152
0.060
0.139
0.190
0,257
0,193
0.067
0.138
0.143
0,119
0,053
0.050
0,033
0.124
0.275
0,144
0,064
0.181
0.089
0.059
0,147
0,077
0,136
0,042
0,131
0.187
0.120
April
0.205
0.234
0.088
0.042
0.19t
0.211
0.055
0,020
0.055
0.002
0.037
0.084
0.086
0.084
0.022
0.001
0.018
0.109
0.157
0.064
0.118
0.075
0.119
0.071
0.046
0.054
0.087
May
0.070
0.076
0.035
0.053
0.017
0.025
0,037
0.023
0.110
0.081
0.226
0.062
0.030
0.127
0.067
0.066
0.018
0.035
0.068
0.057
0.103
0.025
0.032
0.066
June
0.104
0.071
0.068
0.062
0.117
0.138
0.158
0.126
0.208
0.201
0.074
0.070
0.208
0.243
0,139
0,027
0,038
0.021
0.056
0.101
0.082
0.089
0.155
0.032
0.096
0.069
0.042
0.050
0.100
July
0.079
0.060
0.022
0.061
0.061
0.038
0.127
0.128
0.073
0.032
0.096
0.072
0,067
0.043
0.071
0,116
0,053
0,176
0.120
0.261
0.108
0.097
0,063
0,107
0,044
0.081
0.068
0.139
0.088
Aug.
0.058
0.089
0.033
0.046
0.040
0.032
0.076
0,058
0,066
0.067
0.013
0.027
0.022
0,037
0,074
0.123
0,139
0,153
0.080
0.119
0,092
0.095
0,094
0,111
0,080
0.123
0.106
0.052
0.053
0.231
0.099
0,080
Sept.
0.050
0.063
0.053
0.054
0.072
0.073
0.127
0.160
0.168
0.104
0,0*5
0.106
0.128
0.073
0.050
0.035
0.104
0.107
0.080
0.144
0.051
0.049
0.043
0.068
0.051
0.165
0.132
0.057
0.028
0.094
0.084
Oct.
0.091
0.086
0.225
0.073
0.083
0.051
0.078
0.070
0.089
0.080
0.096
0.077
0,114
0.091
0.059
0.120
0.042
0.088
0.094
0,130
0,049
0.145
0.070
0.065
0.051
0,096
0.054
0.082
0,090
0.194
0.092
Nov.
0.112
0.136
0.083
0.064
0,047
0.085
0.089
0.085
0.260
0,117
0.126
0.149
0,033
0.142
0.040
0.072
0.152
0.124
0.052
0.056
0.152
0,203
0.042
0.093
0.103
0.257
0.131
0.066
0.087
0,179
0.111
Dec.
0.113
0.229
0.078
0.080
0.119
0.196
0.126
0.075
0.126
0.084
0.073
0.118
0.145
0.085
0.040
0.058
0.082
0.193
0.086
0.095
0.165
0.111
0.035
0.074
0.113
0.075
0.109
0.163
0.040
0.086
0.196
0.109
143
-------
Table 6-10 (continued). SULFUR DIOXIDE, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(mm)
ST. LOUIS
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
g
g
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
•22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.001
0.00*
0.000
0.006
0.013
0.060
0.000
0.000
0.015
U.002
0.020
0.015
0.0*2
0.006
0.003
0.033
0.003
0.019
0.0*2
0.039
0.06*
0.019
0.083
0.037
O.OS1
0.0*3
0.015
0.029
O.OB7
0.0->7
0.027
Feb.
0.0"
0.02'
o.om
0.037
0.058
0.001
0.02*
0.01*
0.031
0.037
0.079
0.0*1
0.0*2
0.037
0,01*
0.01°
0.01"
n.ou
0.02"
0.017
0.011
0.039
0.0*7
0.06*
O.osi
0.037
March
0.093
0.21*
0.119
0.093
0.038
0.005
0.067
0.052
0.028
0.0**
0.0*9
0.036
0.137
0.0*8
0.00*
0.0*0
0.033
0.05*
0,030
0.0*8
0.026
0,071
0.0*9
0.0*3
0.019
0.008
0.021
0.066
0.056
0.037
0.012
0.052
April
0.011
0.023
O.oir
o.ozs
0.06*
0.017
O.OIB
0.03'J
0.035
O.O*")
0.0**
0.032
0.0*6
0.03*
0.03*
0.025
0.010
0.019
0.01"
0.021
0.010
0.010
0.021
0.021
0.010
0.026
0.02*
0.0**
0.033
0.05*
0.02"
May
0.135
O.nti6
o.oie
0.0*0
0.0?5
o.oie
0.009
o.ou
0.015
0.0*2
0.0*1
O.OU*
0.0»6
O.OB7
0.036
0.0»3
0.050
0.127
0.013
0.010
0.010
O.UO
0.048
O.CV2
0.000
1.026
O.OM
0.036
0.0*9
0.0«3
O.I"*
0.0*0
June
0.123
0.113
0.136
0.121
0.105
O.O85
0.086
0.075
0.021
A. 030
0.020
0.017
0.01*
0.006
0.00*
0.014
0.006
0.003
1.019
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.015
0.007
0.026
0.05*
0.037
July
0.027
0.007
0.016
0.018
0.0**
0.031
0.00*
0.001
0.000
0.00*
0.000
0.001
0.007
0.002
0.001
0.016
0.03*
0.017
0.0*1
0.021
0.008
0.008
0.002
0.018
O.OU
0.023
0.02*
0.022
0.01*
0.01*
Aug.
0.027
0.006
0.001
0.002
0,017
0.005
0.005
0.00*
0.002
0.023
0.002
0.005
0.013
0.006
0.011
0.007
0.002
0.050
O.066
0.056
0.099
0.093
0.062
0.020
0.001
0.052
0,025
Sept.
0.013
0.011
0.009
0.020
0.01*
0.015
0.019
0.005
0.002
0.021
0.019
0.030
0.007
0.011
0.011
0.003
0.006
0.010
0.012
0.018
0.000
0.013
0.019
0.003
0.012
0.009
0.00*
0.003
0.007
0.011
Oct.
0,023
0,0**
0.0**
0.038
0.022
0.007
0.022
0.003
0.017
0.013
0.0*0
0,028
0.0*6
0.023
0,00*
0.015
0,010
0.000
0,012
0.008
0.01*
0.006
0,009
0.010
0.003
0.021
0,001
0,026
0.022
0.020
0,017
0.01*
Nov.
0.00*
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.016
0.021
0.060
0.027
0.015
0.012
0.010
0.018
0.012
0.027
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.078
0.070
0.091
0.0*6
0.032
0.0*1
0.08*
0.03*
0.007
0.060
0.035
0.015
0.029
Dec.
0.018
0.031
0.012
0.021
0.035
0.016
0.007
0.0*3
0.031
0.035
0.021
0,029
0.071
0.027
0.012
0.027
0.011
0.036
0.020
0.038
0.018
0.008
0.017
0.035
0.01*
0.031
0.019
0.099
0.128
0.031
0.024
0.031
WASHINGTON
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
Feb.
March
April
0.053
May
0.039
0.0*6
0.056
0.060
O.OK1
O.OU2
0.007
0.018
0.016
0.011
0.0*7
0.026
0.02*
June
0.002
0.00*
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.017
0.025
0.0**
0.029
0.0*6
0.0*0
0.02*
0.027
0.033
0.015
0.011
0.010
0.010
0.017
July
0.012
O.OU
0.013
0.028
0.023
0.020
0.030
0.0*0
0.036
0.028
0.036
0.029
0.033
0.062
0.062
0.0**
0.023
0.022
0.031
AU9.
0.035
0.031
0.01*
0.019
0.026
0.025
0.050
0.036
0.032
0.022
0.018
0.017
0.022
0.02R
0.0*5
0.037
0.01*
0.028
Sept.
0.022
0.0*6
0.023
0.027
0.027
0.015
0.016
0.035
0.062
0.069
0.061
0.022
0.02*
0.037
0.0*7
0.019
0.021
0.009
0.008
0.032
Oct.
O.OU
0,02*
0.031
0,017
0.029
0.019
0.032
0.013
0.037
0.067
0.093
0,051
0.0*5
0.028
0.025
0.053
0.056
0.06*
0.098
0.088
0.03B
0.0*7
0.065
0.0*0
0.069
0.101
0.132
0.053
Nov.
0.066
0.037
0.065
0.0*3
0.035
0.071
0.077
0.092
0.116
0.130
0.073
0.0*7
0.059
0.065
0.059
0.070
0.078
0.059
0.0*9
0.050
0.069
0.092
0.051
0.077
0.070
0.089
0.079
0.070
0,087
0.077
0.070
Dec.
0.08*
0.105
0.0*2
0.096
0.125
0.11*
0.082
0.093
0.103
0.0*2
0.0*0
0.070
0.113
0.117
0.06*
0.053
0.090
0.06«
0.070
0.06*
0.068
0.035
0,039
0.057
0.067
0.05*
0.073
0.080
0.060
0,082
0.075
144
-------
Table 6-11. TOTAL HYDROCARBONS, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
CHICAGO
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
ie
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
2.23
2.55
2.75
2.8«
2.75
2.40
2.13
2.10
2.44
2.64
2.80
2.97
4. OS
2.84
2.19
2.51
2.40
2.83
2.54
2.56
3.02
2.74
4.57
2.76
2.72
2.02
2.19
2.U
2.13
2.79
2.63
Feb.
2.85
2.76
2.94
2.52
2.56
3.10
3.16
2.99
2.92
2.47
2.39
2.54
3.03
3.03
2.94
2.80
2.53
2.22
2.34
2.59
2.64
2.64
2.54
2.87
2.72
March
2.49
3.76
3.30
2.92
2.48
2.81
2.91
2.57
2.4*
3.77
3.25
3.02
2.77
3.00
2.89
2.7B
2.52
3.75
2. ,60
3.05
3.12
2,61
3.46
2.57
2.79
3.20
3.09
2,68
2.90
2.94
April
3.64
*.»5
2,46
2.79
4.H6
3.58
2.99
1.08
2,12
2.90
2.96
3.ZO
3,78
2.59
3.17
3.48
2.14
2.94
3.04
3.00
3.KZ
Z.37
2.60
3.27
3.68
3.54
3.'!>
3.77
3.08
2.75
3.15
May
2.84
2.44
2.71
2.87
3.09
3.2S
2.41
2.65
3.35
3.46
3.21
Z.9H
3.02
2.73
3.34
4.1?
3.57
2. Sit
2.54
2.70
2.54
3. 12
2.6"
3. in
3.33
2.71
2.63
Z.4J
2.90
2.3"
2.75
2.91
June
3.17
3.73
3.76
3.76
3.88
3.44
3.58
2.74
3.25
3.06
2.54
3.70
3.76
3.67
3.32
4.15
3.99
3.62
3.56
3.18
4.93
3.57
3.53
3.48
3.29
4.47
4.02
3.69
4.04
3.98
3.63
July
3.73
2.53
3.11
2.61
3.01
3.28
3.64
3.84
2.70
3.73
4.42
3.15
3.50
3.60
3.00
3.17
3.21
3.22
3.43
3,45
4.72
3.08
2.35
3.32
3.71
4.12
4.31
4.07
3.94
3.44
Aug.
3.46
3.22
3.60
3,78
3.18
3.22
3.21
3.75
3.43
3.31
3.65
3.64
2.53
3.57
2.49
2.74
3.27
3.11
3.49
4.08
3.68
3.11
3.10
2.86
3.29
Sept.
3.72
3.18
2.92
2.85
3.20
4.42
3.44
5.18
2.79
2.52
2.93
3.85
3.05
3.43
3.44
3.54
2.84
3.48
3.53
3,07
3.18
2.82
3.32
2.77
3.14
2.71
3.31
3.11
3.14
3.13
3.27
Oct.
3.82
3.02
3.47
3.25
3.15
3.03
2.32
2.05
2.27
2.53
2.59
3.19
3.45
4.48
3.42
3.06
3.15
2.97
3.23
2,60
2.82
2.66
2.77
2.32
2.22
2,66
2.67
2.60
2.18
3.45
3.55
2.94
Nov.
3,03
3.04
3.26
2,26
2.06
2.72
3.66
3.24
3.50
3.84
2.64
2.27
2.60
2.63
2.91
2.54
2.83
2.31
2.47
2.37
2.97
2.76
2.11
2.82
2.74
2.34
2.29
2.59
2.87
3)08
2.75
Dec.
2.74
2.90
2.30
2.76
3.37
3.76
2.71
3.07
3.22
2.88
3.19
2.61
2.60
2.85
2.69
2.73
2.47
2.92
3.26
3.45
3.08
2.46
2.31
2.33
2.19
2.60
3.22
3.03
3.14
2.71
2.37
2.83
CINCINNATI
o*re
1
2
3
4
s
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
Feb.
March
2,04
2.16
2.14
2.58
1.95
1.37
1.99
1.99
0.43
0.13
4.20
1.80
1.99
1.88
2.08
2.12
2.12
2.04
1.99
3.47
4.61
4.02
2.79
1.94
2.37
1.87
2.22
April
2. on
2.01
1.11
2.19
7. 13
2.13
2.25
2.08
I. BO
2.11
2.35
2.07
Z.5n
3.12
7.01
1.9S
7.09
2.28
7.39
1.82
1.90
1.82
1.S9
1.9H
7.31
3.37
^.14
7.. 06
2.20
May
2.03
1.96
2.9n
2.83
3.01
2.3«
2.21
2.06
2.00
2.66
1.81
1.9-i
2.12
2.19
1.8*
2.15
1.94
2.00
1.9J
2. in
1.91
2.73
2.04
2. 9S
2.21
1.91
1.97
1.9°
1.64
1.77
2.1?
June
1.82
1.98
1.99
1.91
3.08
2.54
2.14
2.26
2.25
2.10
1.95
2.37
2.92
2.97
2.63
2.36
2.69
2.01
2.22
2.94
2.03
2.14
2.82
2.41
1.62
2.32
3.29
2.22
1.85
2.30
2.35
July
2.40
1.84
1.9K
2.05
3.27
2.06
2.09
2.14
2.15
1.97
1.93
2.05
2.00
2.06
2.48
2.66
3.11
2.65
3.34
2.85
3.26
2.53
2.10
2.35
2.57
3.07
2.09
2.73
2.66
2.64
2.46
2.44
Aug.
2.66
2.40
2.24
2.27
2.45
3.26
S.15
2.33
3.31
1.113
2.27
2.12
1.83
2.32
3.05
2.39
1.84
2.44
Sept.
2.09
2.56
3.49
3.61
3.46
3.21
3.65
3.58
2.13
1.49
1.88
2.16
2.39
2.45
4.00
4.48
2.74
4.00
2.77
2.72
1.85
2.02
2.41
2.12
2.10
2.02
2.16
2.27
2.71
Oct.
2.35
2.59
2.92
2.89
2.58
2.49
2.42
2.31
2.31
2.44
2,76
4.02
3.59
3.49
3.52
2.51
2.76
2.03
2.80
2.98
3.38
5.37
4.37
2.10
2.14
2.41
2.12
2.43
2.22
3.12
2.47
2.83
Nov.
2.61
2.41
2.33
2.10
2.27
2.29
2.58
3.65
2.61
2.82
2.33
2.07
2.69
5.05
4.12
3.40
2.73
2.75
2.49
2.85
3.43
2.99
3.00
2.77
2.97
2.56
2.99
3.3*
2.65
Z.B5
Dec.
2.82
2.86
3.69
3.04
4.21
2.75
2.55
2.40
2.20
2.76
2.09
2.26
2.94
2.48
2.88
5.66
5.06
2.7Z
2.69
2.30
2.49
2.19
1.96
1.91
1.90
2.39
2.79
2.79
145
-------
Tanle 6-11 (continued). TOTAL HYDROCARBONS, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
DENVER
DATE
1
2
3
4
s
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jen.
1.75
3.60
3.00
3.55
2.64
2.12
2.43
2.03
2.37
2.84
3. 58
3.64
4.40
1.64
2.48
2.14
2.42
4.01
3.62
2.96
2.48
2.80
2.69
2.86
Feb.
2.60
3.29
2.65
2.18
1.80
2.47
2.06
2.45
1.85
2.29
2.22
1.74
2.16
2.02
2.14
2.24
2.36
2.13
1.75
2.24
2.18
1.94
1.94
2.76
3.51
2.S6
2.S6
2.29
2.30
March
2.77
2.22
1.84
1.64
1.83
2.67
3.32
2.27
2.74
2.11
2.36
2,66
2.90
2.38
2.82
2.44
2.10
2.33
2.25
2.18
2.15
1.98
1.90
2.35
2.99
1.6R
1.57
2.24
2.32
April
1.94
1.85
2.47
3.S8
2.12
1.98
2.41
1.91
1.65
1.73
1.71
1.83
1.68
1.93
1.75
1.34
2.03
2.29
1.60
1.54
1.63
1.64
1.53
2.18
1.96
2.T2
2. si
2.02
1.56
1.39
1.96
May
1.75
1.93
1.99
2.08
2.2.6
1.95
1.66
2.06
2.30
1.61
1.91
2.04
1.73
1.52
1.S4
1.87
2.20
2.05
2.15
1.90
1.76
2.06
2.09
1.92
2.25
2.06
1.95
2.08
1.53
2.27
1.96
June
2.29
2.51
1.78
1.65
2.02
2.58
1.72
1.88
1.90
1.77
1.52
1.97
1.89
2.00
1.96
2.00
2.22
1.77
2.03
2.20
1.74
2.34
1.95
1.82
2.28
2.09
1.90
2.18
2.05
2.03
2.00
July
1.86
1.96
1.80
2.14
2.56
2.81
2.08
1.7*
2.12
1.92
2.12
2.50
2.43
2.58
2.59
2.08
2.23
1.94
1.80
2.12
2.28
2.18
2.42
2.22
2.19
Aug.
2.08
2.44
2.61
2.44
2.08
1.85
2.40
2.46
2.20
2.53
2.68
2.19
1.89
2.25
2.10
2.36
2.06
2.65
1.86
2.07
2.04
2.29
2.48
1.78
2.08
2.13
2.49
1.86
2.23
2.23
Sept.
2.37
1.86
1.84
1.70
2.27
2.73
2.7!
2.28
2.90
2.79
1.94
1.78
2.08
2.30
2.13
2.21
3.15
2. 15
2.79
2.58
2.76
2.43
2.60
2.56
2.20
2.52
2.51
2.83
1.92
2.38
Oct.
0.80
2.22
2.27
2.78
2.65
1.94
2.21
2.04
3.15
4.18
4.10
2.90
4.25
2.79
2.60
2.68
2.65
4.82
2.33
3.70
2.30
1.73
2.41
2.32
2.75
Nov.
3.02
2.16
2.60
2.50
2.15
4.02
4.34
3.35
3.17
2.85
2.38
5.61
4.98
3.21
4.73
4.64
3.94
2.57
2.42
3.21
2.05
2.35
1.69
1.76
3.46
5.04
4.26
5.50
3.36
Dec.
2.82
3.39
2.71
3.51
3.58
2.12
4.24
3.77
2.61
2.87
2.71
2.75
3.24
3.18
3.79
3.45
2.10
4.00
5.49
3.83
3.27
4.45
3.14
2.47
2.38
3.42
3.43
3.05
3.97
2.57
3.31
3.26
PHILADELPHIA
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
2.55
2.88
4.74
3.62
2.11
2.20
2.44
3.01
2.37
3.41
2.77
2.07
1.78
2.52
1.74
2.91
2.86
2.75
3.45
3.63
6.16
3.51
2.27
1.53
1.47
1.68
2.01
2.73
Feb.
2.62
2.31
1.82
2.14
1.61
1.67
1.29
1.48
2.08
1.93
1.75
1.36
1.94
3.10
3.24
2.41
2.43
2.08
2.82
2.48
1.98
2.13
2.59
1.90
1.72
1.70
2.14
2.10
2.10
March
1.81
2.84
2.66
2.11
2.11
2.31
1.89
1.93
2.32
2.30
2.12
1.64
1.71
1.61
1.89
2.72
2.57
1.97
2.54
1.92
1.78
1.93
1.89
2.32
2.13
April
1.9»
2.01
1.63
1.B7
2.39
2.38
1.89
2.03
1.99
2.32
2.12
1.87
2.00
2.49
May
2.69
2.36
1.91
2.13
2.71
2.26
1.94
2.44
2.19
2.25
2.4B
1.9S
2.30
2.16
2.59
1.93
2.71
2.67
1.79
1.47
1.82
1.72
1.89
1.64
2.07
2.41
2.59
2.92
2.02
2.20
2.21
June
2.35
2.69
2.44
2.28
2.41
3.05
2.53
2.71
2.77
2.78
2.45
2.86
2.44
2.12
2.70
2.75
2.26
2.01
1.80
2.09
2.43
2.62
2.43
2.15
'1.83
2.55
2.56
2.13
2.18
2.43
July
2.16
2.08
2.08
2.04
2.03
2.38
2.39
2.03
2.21
2.81
2.46
2.23
2.54
2.62
2.28
2.66
3.19
3.23
2.30
2.01
2.40
2.51
2.S9
2.28
2.35
1.93
2.81
2.18
2.20
2.12
2.99
2.39
Aug.
2.34
2.62
2.16
2.04
1.89
1.71
2.39
1.72
2.81
3.12
2.83
2.26
2.18
2.32
2.61
2.55
3.03
3.60
3.58
2.39
2.30
2.45
3.59
2.61
2.54
Sept.
1.98
1.86
1.90
2.09
2.24
2.24
3.19
3.27
2.91
2.49
2.56
2.99
3.73
3.55
2.41
2.13
2.34
3.14
2.80
3.06
2.19
1.95
2.32
2.91
2.34
3.4S
2.52
2.21
2.18
2.24
2.57
Oct.
2.59
3,50
4.20
4.13
3.48
2.00
2.18
2.15
2.41
2.65
2.40
2.45
2.53
2.38
2.71
2.61
3.65
2.33
2.09
2.34
2.78
2.56
3.07
3.43
2.44
2.43
3.11
2.08
2.26
3.40
3.14
2.76
Nov.
2.95
1.44
2.61
2.23
1.74
1.94
1.73
1.80
3.56
2.96
3.00
2.20
1.72
2.01
1.87
2.23
2.94
2.82
1.90
3.34
1.95
2.24
2.82
4.48
3.55
2.26
2.28
2.43
2.48
Dec.
2.21
2.51
1.81
1.85
2.57
2.7Z
2.65
2.82
3.84
2.50
3.05
3.31
3.10
2.89
1.85
1.51
2.11
3.48
2.72
4.09
4.71
2.14
1.36
1.55
1.72
1.52
2.03
2.55
1.45
1.82
2.08
2.46
146
-------
TaDle 6-12. TOTAL OXIDANTS, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppm)
CHICAGO
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.006
0.014
0.007
0.002
0.010
0.008
0.002
0.000
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.020
0.045
0.015
0.034
0.028
0.0*7
0.011
0.014
0.022
0.014
Feb.
0.013
0.023
0.008
0.006
0.002
0.000
0.003
March
0.011
0.062
0.027
0.006
0.002
0.000
0.010
0.039
0.039
0.047
0.044
0.013
0.007
0,008
0.019
0.019
0.024
0.031
0.035
0.032
0.029
0.024
April
0.025
0,039
0,029
0.024
0,03*
0.03»
0.02'
0.03B
0.032
0.01"
0.024
0.031
0.02"
0.03V
0.024
0.033
0.043
0.030
0.027
0.031
May
0.021
0.014
0.023
0.031
0.031
0.036
0.037
0.045
0.046
0.070
0.0>8
0.034
0.042
0.028
0.0*1
0.020
0.014
0.026
0.031
0.035
O.U44
0.058
O.OM
0.037
June
0.043
0.072
p. 077
.0.080
0.039
0.049
0.033
0.039
0.021
0.044
0.040
0.028
0.028
0.038
0.046
0.035
0.035
0.043
0.035
0.060
0.044
0.069
0.045
0.044
July
0.038
0.047
0.030
0.025
0.031
0.034
0.026
o.oia
0.024
0.042
0.021
0.032
0,028
0.052
0.054
0.036
0.015
0.022
0.027
0.042
0.036
0,035
0.033
Aug.
0.045
0.053
0.037
0.023
0.027
0.027
0.018
0.019
0.019
0.020
0.032
0.038
0.045
0.039
0.029
0.040
0.032
0.023
0.020
0.030
0.032
0.034
0.037
0.036
0.040
0.033
0.027
0.050
0.032
0.024
0.032
0.032
Sept.
0.036
0.039
0.043
0.049
0.042
0.063
0.050
0.055
0.019
0.028
0.036
0.036
o.oia
0.025
0.029
0.035
0.052
0.027
0.020
0.022
0.023
0.024
0.019
0.035
Oct.
0.013
0.016
0.031
0.017
0.012
0.013
O.H17
0.013
0.029
0.022
0.027
0.018
0.017
0.032
0.034
0.043
0.024
0,032
0.029
0.037
0.032
0,022
0.028
0.02B
0.028
0.025
0,058
0.048
0.027
Nov.
0,041
0.040
0.039
0,020
0.016
0.014
0.028
0.023
0,045
0,048
0,025
0.024
0.026
0.013
0.016
0.031
0.018
0.030
0.023
0.002
0.017
0.012
0.000
0.003
0.022
0.023
Dec.
0.008
0.023
0.011
0.013
0.026
0.044
0.023
0.027
0.032
0.027
0.031
0.017
0.008
CINCINNATI
CATE
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2S
28
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.016
0.013
0.012
0.009
0.013
0.013
0.019
0.019
0.011
0.020
0.016
0.018
0.020
0.018
0,022
0.021
0.016
Feb.
0.022
0.010
0.021
0.02"
0.024
0.021
0,017
0.007
0.013
0.023
0.010
0.016
0.022
0,017
0.014
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.020
0.025
0.021
0.014
0.017
0.029
0.028
0.020
March
0.019
0.028
0.028
0,019
0.017
0.016
0.031
0.022
0.026
0.029
0.026
0.025
0.023
0.014
0.022
0.026
0.020
0.026
0.031
0.022
0.023
0.032
0.038
0.024
April
O.f>3«
0,040
n,H2<)
0,026
0,035
0.027
0.034
0.05*
0.028
0.034
0,03?
0,029
0.030
0.034
0.042
0,036
0.025
0.036
O.n33
0.031
0.03'
0.028
0.029
0.033
0.026
0.037
0.078
0.041
0.042
0.036
May
0.031
0.031
0.0*9
0.0*5
0.055
0.021
0.044
0.045
0.042
0.054
0.032
0.040
0.025
0.033
0.0*3
0.046
0.0*8
0.035
0.043
O.OM
0.0«>6
0.054
0.074
0.059
0.069
0.0*5
June
0.03ft
0.034
0.040
0.050
0.03*
0.044
0.044
0.044
0.060
0.059
0.032
0.030
0.025
0.033
0.025
0.033
0.050
0.055
0.042
July
tl.037
0.039
0.037
0.036
0.035
0.045
0.032
0.042
0.066
0.029
0.045
0.026
0.035
0.045
0.027
0.033
0.041
0.054
0.031
0.032
0.042
0.051
0.045
0.040
Aug.
0.034
0.041
0.031
0,039
0.036
0.044
0.020
0,016
0.023
0,036
0.040
0.039
Sept.
0.054
0.054
0.046
0,066
0.005
o.oea
0.089
0.053
0.035
0.042
0.034
0.037
0.033
0,044
0.068
0.018
0.050
0.045
0.036
0.031
0.045
0.032
0.024
0.016
0.044
0.0*7
Oct.
0.039
0.049
0.043
0.028
0,018
0.021
0.030
0.015
0.010
0.012
0.026
0,024
0.027
0.022
0.027
0.021
0.023
0.020
0,01*
0.014
0.013
0.001
0.013
0.013
0.022
Nov.
0.009
0.015
0.014
0.031
0.023
0.021
0.018
0.026
0,024
0.017
0.023
0.022
0.018
Dec.
0.015
0.020
0.010
0.017
0.024
0.020
0.021
0.017
0.016
0,012
0.017
0.011
0.016
0.017
0.016
-------
Taole 6-12 (continued). TOTAL OXIDANTS, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppra)
DENVER
DATf
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.021
0.021
0.013
0.021
O.OZ7
0.014
0.019
0.027
0.019
0.015
O.OZ3
0,025
0.040
0.028
0.021
0.011
0.016
0.036
0.030
0.023
0.022
0.023
Feb.
0.022
0.029
0.030
0.035
0.015
0.022
0.016
0.032
0.031
0.02S
0.029
0.025
0.031
0.029
0,018
0.017
0.025
0.022
0.028
0.032
0.033
0.020
0.028
0.029
0.022
0.023
0.026
March
0.024
0.020
0.034
0.019
0.023
0.029
0.018
April
0.049
0.043
0.045
0.044
0.058
0.043
0.037
0.032
0.036
0.05*
0.046
0.031
0.044
0.032
May
0.050
0.019
0,051
0.044
0.028
June
0.021
0.026
0.020
0.028
0.038
July
Au9.
0.084
0.089
O.OSS
0.042
0.056
0.050
0.041
0,039
0.048
0.033
Sepl.
0.056
0.049
0.037
0.035
0.025
0.031
0.033
0.050
0.034
0.021
0.023
0.025
0.024
0.033
0.020
0.032
0.025
0.032
Ocl.
0.025
0.034
0.032
0,042
0.030
0.030
0,031
0.037
0.045
0.029
0.043
0,030
0.036
0.030
0.031
0.026
0.030
0.033
Nov.
0.02?
0.024
0.027
0.040
0.028
0.024
0.041
0.020
0.017
0.014
0.020
0.016
0.021
0.028
0.025
0.014
0.021
0.024
Dec.
0.017
0.015
0.010
0.020
0.001
0.012
0.014
0.009
0.016
0.015
0.005
0.003
0.013
0,014
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.008
0.022
0.022
0.030
0.032
0.018
0,023
0.025
0,014
0.008
0.015
PHILADELPHIA
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.029
0.020
0.014
0.032
0.016
0,018
0.005
0.030
0.019
0.012
0.016
0.015
0.017
0.022
0.041
0.035
0.057
0.034
0.037
0.019
0.013
0.017
0.006
0.009
0.022
Feb.
0.035
0.028
0.022
0.025
0.020
0.017
0.013
0.021
0.043
0.035
0.027
0.023
0.017
0.020
0.026
0,031
0.012
0.014
0.030
0.024
March
0,029
0.030
0.026
0,031
0,017
0.019
0.032
0,030
0.036
0.048
0.019
0.020
0.014
0.025
0.015
0.012
0.002
0.011
0.014
0.019
0.026
0.015
0.018
0,013
0,011
0.015
0.030
0,021
April
0.017
0.029
0.036
0,027
0.028
0,016
0.025
0.038
0.044
0.043
0.025
0.016
0.027
0.031
0.026
0.029
0.017
0.033
0.023
0.036
0.034
0.036
0.042
0.030
May
0.030
0.029
0.010
0.019
0.016
0.016
0.004
0.014
0.039
0.029
0.032
0.025
0.04g
0.022
0.037
0.030
0.042
O.OZ6
June
0.046
0.030
0.046
0.026
0.022
0.002
0.022
0.028
0.033
0.073
0.042
0.039
0.049
0.049
0.031
0.007
0.036
July
0.056
0.049
0.043
0.061
0.036
0.030
0.050
0.030
0.034
0.031
0.026
0.063
0.058
0.077
0.073
0.041
0.033
0.028
0.059
0.031
0.040
0.036
0.046
Aug.
0.035
0.040
0.029
0.030
0.036
0.037
0.045
0.031
0.016
0.021
0.026
0.020
0.030
0.054
0.036
0.031
0.036
0.031
0.012
0.019
0.017
0.012
0.003
0.001
0.007
0.013
0.016
0.018
0.011
0.019
0.025
Sept.
0.012
0.014
0.013
0.036
0.019
0.007
0.016
0.014
0.020
0.011
0.020
0.021
0.034
0.042
0.015
0.011
0.019
0.029
0.013
0.011
0.013
0.024
0.019
Oct.
0.031
0.046
0.042
0.027
0.023
0.024
0.014
0.025
0.031
0.030
0.034
0.037
0.025
0.021
0.014
0.023
0.021
0.025
0.029
0.033
0.032
0.022
0.032
0.034
0.026
0.033
0.039
0.043
0.029
Nov.
0.039
0.024
0.031
0.027
0.022
0.022
0.018
0.028
0.034
0.040
0.046
0.026
0.017
0.009
0.015
0.009
0.016
0.019
0.020
0.016
0.009
0.027
0.013
0.020
0.028
0.019
0.016
0.021
0.022
Dec.
0.019
0.026
0.021
0.019
0.017
0.029
0,036
0.014
0.014
0.015
0.018
0.017
0.008
0.010
0.016
0.020
0.018
0.033
0.037
0.011
0.011
0.002
0.007
0.026
0.006
0.011
0.017
148
-------
Table 6-12 (continued). TOTAL OXIOANTS, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(ppra)
ST. LOUIS
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
19
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.019
O.OM
0.041
0.027
0.01 7
0.035
0.02V
0.000
0.019
Feb.
0.017
0.03?
0.02?
0.041
0.01?
0.025
0.031
0.028
1.010
0.01ft
0.032
0.040
0.070
1.021
0.024
0.04]
0,034
O.OJ7
0.02s
0.0?0
0.011
o.oo»
o.oi»
0.07.9
o.o?-»
n.027
March
0.027
0.025
0.018
0.012
0.010
0.017
0.016
0.031
0.040
0.040
0.026
0.016
0.015
o.oia
0.020
0.040
0.055
0.042
0.028
0.046
0.041
0.046
0.036
0.050
0.069
0.032
0.031
April
0.027
0.053
0.042
0.041
0.04>>
0.03ft
0.041
0.03"
0.053
0.09'<
0.050
n.04«
0.035
0,03'
0.055
0.044
0.054
0,041
0.05"
0.041
0,03?
0,054
0.056
0.045
0.03;
0.045
May
0.0"4
0.047
0.049
0,046
D.0^7
0,046
0.046
0.039
o.oia
0,023
O.u)3
0.040
0.033
o.o->o
0.0^6
0.017
0.0<7
0.046
0.045
(J.u>4
O.C'56
O.OS7
0.048
0.021
0.040
0.040
June
0.022
0.026
0.022
0.021
0.042
0.043
1.039
0.044
0.060
0.040
0.036
0.017
0.03S
0.040
1.030
0.038
0.060
0.049
0.042
0.088
0,040
July
0.061
0.044
0.027
0.044
0.029
0.049
0.039
0.056
0.035
0,061
0,017
0.022
0.028
0.047
0.045
0.041
0.037
0.048
0.047
0.038
0.041
0.039
0.039
0.047
0.058
0.021
0.019
0.043
0.050
0.048
0.042
Aug.
0.033
0.038
0.036
0.034
0.046
0.047
0.081
0.025
0.046
0.081
0.062
0.05K
0.058
0.059
0.038
0.030
0.065
0,033
0,047
0.04H
0.041
0.073
0.049
0.031
0.048
Sepl.
0.043
0.051
0.072
0.062
0,04?
0.038
0.054
0.034
0.040
0.03"
0.032
0.031
0.021
0.020
0.027
0.017.
0.021
0.020
0.027
0.021
0.039
0.027
0.009
0.013
0.026
0.030
0.033
Oct.
0.041
0.032
0.031
0.031
0.021
0.009
0.018
0.015
0.017
0.035
0.039
0.043
0.050
0.032
0.026
0.039
0.037
0.042
0.041
0.053
0.032
0.024
0.030
0.024
0.017
0.025
0.032
0.024
0.031
Nov.
0.019
0.017
0.017
0.013
0.020
0.021
0.028
1.024
0.041
0.021
0.020
0.027
0.030
0.036
0.036
0.027
0.028
0.035
0.045
0.022
0.023
0.037
0.026
0.029
0.021
0.006
0.019
0.021
0.026
Dec.
0.011
0.036
0.028
0.040
0.024
0.021
0,024
0.027
0.023
0.015
0,012
0.019
0.037
0.029
0.031
0.021
0.016
0.013
0.016
0.016
0.011
0.022
0.024
0.023
WASHINGTON
C«TE
1
2
3
4
S
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3D
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0.013
0.016
U.015
0.009
0.003
0.004
0.007
0.008
0.0»5
0.009
0.0"5
O.OOU
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0«1
0.008
0.002
0.012
0.024
0.022
0.048
0.041
0.023
0*037
U.021
0.020
O.OZO
0.012
0.025
0.013
Feb.
0.065
0.022
o.ou
0,024
0.012
0.010
o.ooa
0,020
o.oi*
1.00"
0.012
0.015
0.01H
0.016
0.0|0
0.01?.
o.rm
o.ooo
0.012
0.017
O.OOA
0.004
o.ou
March
0.024
0.034
0,029
u.020
0.017
0.019
0,010
0,009
0.010
0,014
0.017
0.022
0.025
0,041
0.020
0.013
0.019
0.035
0.029
0.021
April
0.032
0.054
0.031
1.024
0.019
0.017
0.01»>
0.02"
U.Oll
0.017
0.0311
0.02"
0.014
0,016
0.014
0.121
o.oi«
0.030
0.03«
0.024
May
0.018
0.0^2
0.0*3
0.026
0.030
0.014
0.022
0.022
0,021
0.024
O.OZO
0.022
0.015
0.010
0.027
0.037
0.042
0.036
0.0'JO
0.027
0.021
0.016
0.047
0.033
0.040
0.041
0.0»0
0.034
0.035
0.026
0.028
June
0.047
0.065
0.045
0.041
0.042
0.034
0.033
0.034
0.036
0.027
0.037
0.044
0.031
0.050
0.057
0.027
0.037
0.074
0.047.
0.041
0.054
0.048
0.033
0.046
ro.o»3
July
0.050
0.043
0.038
0,037
0.031
0.037
0.050
0.024
0.023
0.031
0.031
0.038
0.043
0.027
0.031
0.043
0.078
0.056
0.035
0.028
0.036
0.051
0.055
0.044
0.032
0.059
0.080
0.032
' 0.028
0.046
0.029
0.040
Aug.
0.050
0.039
0.029
0.031
0.034
0.050
0.045
0.030
0.035
0.029
0.03Z
0.028
0.029
0.034
0.052
0.059
0.056
0.048
0.035
0.016
0.018
0.016
0.015
0.012
0.015
o.oie
0.015
0.024
0.033
0.031
0.027
0.032
Sept.
0.027
0.033
0.038
0.035
0.041
0.045
0.051
0.054
0.030
0.018
0.025
0.043
0.051
0.061
0.0319
0.019
0.022
0.033
0.043
0.049
0.031
0.019
0.023
0.025
0,019
0.024
0.016
0.012
0.015
0.017
0.032
Oct.
0.022
0.031
0.034
0.037
3.032
0.014
0.015
0.019
0.019
0.012
0.015
O.OU
0.021
0.027
0.023
0.023
0.018
0.014
0.013
0.020
0.019
0.032
0.041
0.024
0.017
0.019
0.020
0.016
0.026
0.028
0.038
0.023
Nov.
0.033
0.020
0.021
0.012
0.013
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.025
0.009
0.008
0.018
0.015
0.019
0.027
0.025
0.019
0.015
0.038
0.016
0.014
0.039
0.109
0.071
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.022
dec.
0.003
0.004
0.008
0.007
0.007
0.009
0.015
0.009
0.006
0.003
0.020
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.008
0.022
0.027
0.010
0.010
0.002
0.005
0.008
0.006
0.001
0.003
0.006
0.001
0.004
0.007
149
-------
Table 6-13. ALDEHYDES, 24-HOUR BUBBLER
ALASKA
FAIRBANKS
SITE 01
ARKANSAS
EL DORADO
SITE 01
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE 02
DELAWARE
WILMINGTON
SITE 01
DC
HASHINGTON
SITE 02
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO
SITE 02
INDIANA
EAST CHlCtGC
SITE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
SITE 01
IOWA
OES MOINES
SITE 01
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE
SITE 01
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON
SITE 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
CITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
ST. LOUIS
SITE 01
SITE 02
NEU JERSEY
CAMOEN
SITE 01
NEkARK
SITE 01
NEW YORK
NEK YORK CITY
SITE 01
OHIO
CINCINNATI
SHE 03
CLEVELAND
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA CITY
SITE 01
TCLSA
SITE 01
OREGON
PORTLAND
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
ht
O f
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
5
4
8
11
12
13
U
14
13
I 1
10
11
9
12
15
U
10
13
9
IB
15
12
11
4
Concentration. jjg/n>3 b
Mln
0
4
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
ft
2
1
6
1
1
1
5
1
0
0
17
1
0
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
0
4
0
7
1
1
3
i
1
2
2
0
7
3
2
1
9
I
1
0
IB
4
0
20
0
4
0
13
3
2
8
7
2
2
12
4
7
14
«t
3
9
3
2
1
37
9
0
30
2
11
2
21
4
3
13
11
2
15
4
a
17
5
4
11
6
7
3
54
10
1
40
2
11
4
22
5
8
16
12
4
16
13
8
24
7
4
15
7
9
3
74
18
1
SO
3
11
4
31
5
10
18
12
4
18
27
9
36
7
10
18
12
11
a
78
22
1
SO
3
16
4
36
8
11
20
15
5
26
29
11
37
9
13
19
19
12
8
94
43
2
70
4
16
;
36
8
18
24
18
6
34
33
10
13
55
10
13
24
19
15
9
100
77
2
80
4
20
8
41
9
19
30
20
6
61
41
11
13
57
14
25
27
20
15
10
108
105
2
90
12
20
21
49
10
23
32
26
7
78
52
19
17
68
16
30
64
22
18
13
146
120
2
Max
12
20
21
67
11
25
40
35
16
92
54
19
IB
92
18
39
91
22
21
15
161
151
2
Arltti
mean
Geo
•nean
Std
geo
dev'
150
-------
Tabl« 6-13 (continued). ALDEHYDES, 24-HOUR BUBBLER3
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 02
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
TENNESSEE
CHATTANOOGA
SITE 01
TEXAS
EL PASC
SITE 01
PSJAOF'fl
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT L*KE CITY
SITE 01
WASHINGTON
SEATTLE
SITE 01
WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. ol
samples
10
7
11
5
12
10
11
15
Mln
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
Concentration, jjg/m3
Frequency distribution - percentUe
10
n
n
0
?
0
p
0
7
20
0
2
2
2
1
0
0
13
30
1
4
2
2
1
2
1
14
40
2
4
4
2
1
3
2
16
SO
7
5
5
10
6
4
2
24
60
7
11
5
10
6
9
3
26
70
11
11
8
13
13
9
4
64
80
13
13
8
13
18
14
7
72
90
20
36
10
30
75
14
9
77
Max
27
36
11
30
81
19
50
85
Arith
mean
Geo
mean
sia
geo
oev
aThe experimental network for evaluating aldehyde method was initiated during 1967, so the number of samples is too small to be representative
of full year. Summaries are included as preliminary data to indicate general range of concentration to be expected.
^*o convert from yg/m^ to ppm, multiply by 0.000843.
1S1
-------
Table 6-14. NITROGEN DIOXIDE, 24-HOUR BUBBLER
ALASKA
FAIRBANKS
SITE 01
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE 02
CONNECTICUT
H»RTFO"D
SITE 01
NEh HAVEN
SITE 01
DELAWARE
NEkARK
SITE 01
WILMINGTON
SITE 01
DC
UflSHIUGTCN
SITE OZ
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO
SITE 02
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
SITE 01
EVANSVILLE
SITE 01
INDIANAPOLIS
SITE 01
lOkA
OES KOINES
SITE 01
DLBUSUE
SITE 01
KENTUCKY
CCVIN6TCN
SITE 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
ST. LOUIS
SITE 01
SITE 02
NEBRASKA
OMAHA
SITE 01
NEh JERSEY
BURLINGTON COUNTY
SITE 02
CAMDEN
SITE 01
GLASSBCRO
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. ol
samples
39
23
24
26
24
23
25
26
24
26
24
26
21
26
26
26
23
26
24
24
25
26
26
24
25
Concentration, ug/m3 a
Mln
U
56
50
46
29
49
135
163
58
23
36
30
54
34
46
72
33
61
54
41
99
49
70
34
76
Frequency distribution - percentlle
10
36
60
109
72
30
108
168
172
75
35
4R
51
109
56
91
93
59
74
171
85
119
87
95
134
93
20
47
82
127
86
36
117
178
1S9
9l
40
57
56
114
119
145
104
33
106
174
108
127
126
97
153
134
30
64
108
143
128
40
120
200
221
107
46
66
64
117
149
153
111
no
139
191
127
139
158
113
184
169
40
69
121
159
156
41
140
212
241
125
52
84
85
135
151
177
116
147
153
206
138
147
169
118
197
186
SO
75
134
168
164
47
152
228
260
128
67
98
90
144
155
182
120
161
165
214
141
157
190
122
219
216
60
9l
140
179
178
64
153
248
292
177
76
112
104
172
168
200
137
167
189
226
152
176
198
132
236
244
70
111
163
200
188
84
232
305
334
U3
106
117
116
190
178
206
155
170
197
Z27
176
196
239
152
269
273
eo
120
177
254
215
118
265
311
341
203
117
123
138
198
192
239
162
186
227
253
183
204
244
161
372
292
90
153
188
270
31S
184
315
358
351
229
1?1
142
155
220
217
288
191
200
Z87
286
184
300
315
205
429
301
Max
224
205
624
478
376
352
387
460
388
218
186
168
228
561
345
270
236
405
418
223
331
488
243
473
418
Arlth
mean
87
132
205
177
85
180
248
271
153
82
96
96
153
165
188
135
144
177
219
143
180
200
133
246
219
Seo
mean
75
124
178
152
64
163
237
260
139
69
88
87
144
145
175
129
129
158
208
136
170
178
128
217
200
Sid
800
dev
1.76
1.46
1.69
1.80
2.03
1.60
1.35
1.34
1.57
1.82
1.54
1.57
1.45
1.73
1.53
1.35
1.68
1.63
1.43
1.45
1.40
1.68
1.34
1.76
1.57
"To convert from ug/m to ppm, multiply by 0.000532.
152
-------
Table 6-14 (continued). NITROGEN DIOXIDE. 24-HOUR BUBBLER
OHIO
CINCINNATI
SITE 03
CLEVELAND
SUE 01
DAYTON
SITE 01
YCUN6STOfcN
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA CtTY
SITE 01
TILSA
SITE 01
PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 02
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
HARMINSTER
SITE 01
hEST CHESTER
SITE 01
PUERTO RICC
6UAYANILLA
SITE 01
RHCOE ISLAND
PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
TENNESSEE
CHATTANOOGA
SITE 01
NASHVILLE
SITE 01
TEXAS
EL PASO
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01
WASHINGTON
SEATTLE
SITE 01
WEST VI"6INIA
CHARLESTON
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
MILWAUKEE
SITE 01
WYCMIN6
CASPER
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. ol
samples
24
26
26
25
2*
25
23
24
25
24
23
21
24
24
26
25
23
26
26
23
Concentration. jjg/m3
Mln
52
20
28
100
3*
27
90
39
60
36
29
26
41
64
28
10
11
46
96
6
Frequency distribution - percentUe
10
100
8'
30
113
7*
31
129
58
81
50
35
36
43
100
43
32
26
59
128
29
20
125
69
34
122
81
45
l7l
81
87
52
36
45
58
111
47
35
28
eo
136
45
30
139
110
42
144
110
50
182
106
99
66
43
63
112
132
64
51
48
91
140
52
40
149
125
46
146
115
52
200
121
108
80
48
72
122
148
70
59
72
120
152
58
50
154
128
48
159
136
59
205
133
129
85
54
78
126
153
72
61
86
133
165
59
60
167
HI
53
164
161
64
221
163
156
9l
58
108
157
172
77
71
109
147
182
65
70
175
162
62
167
176
79
295
175
165
105
68
128
167
180
9l
108
125
186
195
78
80
187
176
66
205
ISO
86
358
187
174
113
71
141
U2
210
104
165
166
211
206
85
90
248
197
93
23«
201
121
364
215
222
143
72
151
201
224
132
200
174
233
Z*7
99
Max
348
260
268
266
259
2*8
436
297
278
271
82
196
*S9
253
151
225
245
274
323
145
Arith
mean
163
135
60
165
139
72
236
141
140
93
55
93
144
158
80
91
98
143
175
66
Geo
•nean
151
125
52
159
127
63
218
127
130
84
52
80
121
151
74
69
75
128
169
57
Std
geo
dev'
1.51
1.54
1.6*
1.30
1.61
1.66
1.50
1.6*
1.51
1.58
1.37
l.fll
1.8*
i.*o
1.5*
2.19
2.28
1.6S
1.31
1.89
"To convert front wg/m3 to ppm, multiply by 0.000532.
153
-------
Tablee-lS. SULFUR DIOXIDE, 24-HOUR BUBBLER
ALASKA
FAIPBAI.'KS
SITE 01
COLORADO
DENVER
SITE OZ
CONNECTICUT
HARTFORD
SITE 01
NE» HAVEN
SITE 01
DELAWARE
NEWARK
SITE 01
WILMINGTON
SITE 01
DC
WASHINGTON
SITE OZ
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO
SITE OZ
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
SITE 01
EVANSVILLE
SITE fll
INDIANAPOLIS
SITE 01
IOkA
DES KOINES
SITE 01
DLBUCUE
SITE 01
KENTUCKY
SITE 01
MICHIGAN
DETROIT
SITE 01
MINNESOTA
MINNEAPOLIS
SITE 01
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SITE 01
ST. LOUIS
SITE 01
SITE 02
NEBRASKA
OPAHA
SITE 01
NEk JERSEY
BURLINGTON COUNTY
SITE 02
CAMDEN
SITE 01
GLASSBCPC
SITE 01
JERSEY CITY
SITE 01
NEWARK
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
»T
67
No. of
samples
41
23
2ft
2ft
22
Z3
25
Z*
24
25
23
26
22
26
25
25
25
2ft
25
25
Z*
26
25
2ft
26
Concentration, ug/">3 *
Mln
2
4
13
ft
Z
9
15
11
20
ft
9
2
Z
ft
7
ft
7
26
7
23
ft
41
IB
Frequency distribution - percent! le
10
ft
IS
in
9
ft
ZZ
2ft
*Z
25
13
Q
4
7
9
7
4
1«
32
1*
ft*
6
57
23
20
ft
7
23
20
ft
29
26
83
30
22
18
S
13
12
7
5
30
ftO
27
61
a
7l
39
30
ft
9
38
51
ft
33
43
93
*7
26
21
7
18
19
11
7
50
61
31
84
1ft
I Oft
46
40
5
13
ftft
58
5
47
*7
1*3
77
3Z
Z7
8
20
ZZ
13
7
69
69
42
89
14
132
69
50
&
18
63
89
7
58
69
161
77
39
31
11
10
21
35
18
11
72
83
11
43
107
17
146
78
60
7
ZZ
80
166
11
71
8*
205
116
ft7
43
13
12
29
ftl
28
11
87
9*
62
1*7
23
170
88
70
a
33
111
188
21
93
9*
237
U6
51
75
16
13
38
52
43
14
100
100
18
63
177
33
175
177
80
9
*6
135
2*3
39
118
125
401
191
65
90
22
25
41
7*
58
IB
12*
102
26
99
182
38
221
226
90
11
68
188
299
41
1*1
175
590
232
115
119
3*
32
62
78
122
27
151
163
67
130
290
ftl
261
299
Max
107
83
254
453
6ft
336
2*3
658
*18
129
167
69
165
75
150
290
43
29*
207
68
1*7
*93
69
323
*27
Arlth
mean
9
26
85
136
17
77
84
232
117
*7
53
15
19
28
42
47
13
87
88
20
57
139
24
152
1*9
Oeo
•neen
6
IB
61
75
9
56
63
155
83
36
36
11
11
21
30
2ft
10
6ft
76
14
43
110
18
13ft
at
Std
&
1.97
z.si
z.3e
3.86
Z.92
,.28
Z.Z1
2.76
2.39
2.24
2.47
2.2*
2.56
2.39
2.S0
3.06
1.93
2.40
1.74
2.25
2.32
2.04
2.18
1.7*
2.56
aTo convert from ug/nr to ppm, multiply by 0.000382.
154
-------
Table 6-15 (continued). SULFUR DIOXIDE, 24-HOUR BUBBLER
NEK YORK
NE»i YORK CITY
SITE 01
OHIO
CINCINNATI
SITE 03
CLEVELAND
SITE 01
DAYTON
SITE 01
SITE 01
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHO"A CITY
SITE 01
TLLSA
e t TP Ql
5 1 I C V 1
PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 02
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
fcAHMINSTER
SITE 01
I.EST CHESTER
SITE 01
PUERTO SICC
6LAYANILL*
SITE 01
RHODE ISLAND
PROVIDENCE
SITE 01
TENNESSEE
CHATTA^CGA
SITE 01
NASHVILLE
SITE 01
TEXAS
EL PASS
SITE 01
PASADENA
SITE 01
UTAH
SALT L*KE CITY
SITE 01
WASHINGTON
SEATTLE
SITE 01
WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON
SITE 01
WISCONSIN
MILWAUKEE
SITE 01
WYOMING
CASPER
SITE 01
Year
67
67
67
67
67
47
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
No. of
samples
21
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
23
25
23
25
79
£.£
24
26
22
26
23
26
Z4
25
Concentration, pg/m3 *
Mln
78
16
13
2
17
4
15
20
8
7
2
4
3
4
2
2
4
16
4
Frequency distribution - psrcentlle
10
108
22
26
4
24
4
20
32
13
11
4
4
4
4
5
6
22
20
130
23
29
5
29
5
53
44
15
14
6
6
5
7
7
12
24
7
30
190
26
36
7
34
7
59
53
21
14
9
7
7
7
7
14
33
9
40
215
28
41
7
35
7
71
60
26
18
11
9
11
9
9
18
36
11
50
290
35
49
9
38
9
77
60
29
21
II
15
10
12
11
11
20
37
14
60
356
42
64
9
49
11
91
64
44
27
24
22
21
14
14
12
12
25
39
18
70
419
47
83
11
63
12
10
96
69
47
33
•ty
9**
26
22
18
23
19
35
45
25
80
533
50
86
18
72
16
11
177
81
49
40
»t
o*
Ifl
Jo
33
30
20
26
42
41
55
35
90
BIS
68
107
88
131
22
13
299
101
125
82
16
fla
B9
66
121
29
34
57
60
75
53
Max
972
131
120
109
194
35
49
452
164
128
171
9a
to
76
167
95
66
83
153
99
113
Arlth
mean
364
41
60
22
58
11
9
116
66
44
34
8
39
23
31
la
17
21
31
43
25
Gee
•nean
280
36
51
11
48
9
T
82
60
33
24
t f
1. 7
16
15
14
12
12
13
21
38
16
su
seo
dev'
2.12
1.65
1.87
2.88
1.83
1.86
1_s
.93
2.38
1.59
2.17
2.21
34.K
.63
2 a?
.9*
2.51
3.16
2.27
2.38
2.64
2.41
1.59
2.48
aTo convert from iig/n3 to ppm. multiply by 0.000382.
15S
-------
TABLE 6-16. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF HOURLY SULFUR DIOXIDES IN NEW YORK CITY IN 1967 a
(PPm)
SITE
12
13
14
22
23
24
26
27
28
* VA|_IO
'TATA
S3.U
S1.3
99.9
35. *
SU.l
SO. 7
58.8
58.1-
»9.f
"MM
".01
O.Ul
O.UO
O.Ul
0.01
O.Ul
0.01
0.01
0.01
10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.05
IV
".08
O.Ofi
0.08
0.07
0.10
0.06
0,09
0.07
0.07
bJ
0.11
0.10
0.13
0.11
0.14
O.OH
0.13
0.10
O.OB
70
0.16
0.14
0.13
0.15
0.20
0.13
0.18
0.15
0.1C
90
0.26
O.-il
0.31
U.24
0.30
0.22
0.27
0.24
u.14
9»
U.34
0.26
U.40
0.^9
0.36
0.^8
0.34
0,30
0.16
98
0.45
0.34
0.54
0.36
0.46
0.35
0.43
0.37
0.40
99
O.S1
0.39
0.64
0.48
O.bl
0.40
0.50
0.4Z
0.22
Max
0.95
0.93
1.13
0.84
1.14
0.62
1.12
0.81
0.42
ARrT
MEAN
0.14
0.12
0.16
0.13
0.17
0.12
0.16
0.13
0.09
G&0
MEAN
0.11
0.10
0.12
0.11
0.13
0.09
0.12
0.10
0.08
(3 tO
3TO
UEV
i«92
i.75
2.19
1.87
1.97
1.99
1.94
1.9Z
1.47
3 All sites mentioned above operated Wilson sequential samplers with the exception of site 14,
which operated a Davis electroconductivity analyzer. At all sites except site 14, the chemical
hydrogen peroxide method of analysis was employed.
156
-------
Table 6-17. LEAD CANDLE
SULFATION RATE, NATIONAL AIR SURVEILLANCE NETWORKS, 196?
(mg S03/I00 cm2-day)
Station
Alaska
Anchorage
Arizona
Paradise Val ley
Phoenix
Tucson
Arkansas
Little Rock
Colorado
Denver (CAMP)
Mesa Verde N Pa
Delaware
Kent County^
Washington, D.C.
(CAMP)
Hawai i
Honolulu
Idaho
Boise
1 1 1 inois
Chicago (CAMP)
Indiana
Muncie
South Bend
Terre Haute
Iowa
Dubuque
Kentucky
Ashland
Louisvi 1 le
Maryland
Calvert County3
Michigan
Grand Rapids
Minnesota
St. Paul
Mississippi
Jackson County3
Missouri
St. Louis (CAMP)
Montana
Helena
Nebraska
Omaha
Nevada
Las Vegas
White Pine County3
New Hampshi re
Concord
North Carolina
Charlotte
Ohio
Cincinnati (CAMP)
Jan.
0.06
0.17
0.22
0.11
0.10
0.29
0.00
0.82
1.79
0.34
0.09
5.93
0.62
0.24
1.78
0.28
0.28
0.72
0.05
1.76
0.33
0.45
0.07
0.00
0.42
0.13
1.12
Feb.
0.09
0.15
0.10
0.24
0.08
0.22
0.00
0.66
1.43
0.28
0.10
5.48
0.55
0.27
1-43
0.34
0.50
1.21
0.05
1.49
0.23
0.19
0.07
0.00
0.61
0.55
1.10
Mar.
0.63
0.20
0.47
1.47
0.44
4.91
1.14
0.40
1.17
0.77
1.03
2.04
0.59
0.30
0.57
0.20
0.63
1.09
Apr.
0.07
0.06
0.09
0.48
0.12
0.14
0.00
0.63
1.28
0.37
0.07
2.94
0.96
1.41
0.33
1.04
0.18
0.52
0.82
0.05
1.75
0.37
0.41
0.07
0.05
0.50
0.39
0.77
May
0.07
0.05
0.11
0.31
0.12
0.16
0.09
0.81
0.70
0.30
0.11
2.00
0.07
0.69
0.87
0.28
1.04
0.20
0.38
0.48
0.11
1.39
0.18
0.55
0.05
0.07
0.55
0.79
1.31
June
0.15
0.19
0.16
0.48
0.53
0.15
0.19
0.47
0.77
0.17
0.76
1.88
0.37
0.47
0.36
0.13
1.17
0.19
0.33
0.80
0.20
0.61
0.24
0.96
0.20
0.17
0.64
1.03
0.46
July
0.11
0.14
0.12
0.55
0.50
0.15
0.11
0.51
0.55
0.10
0.16
1.33
0.25
0.19
0.33
0.08
1.49
0.19
0.15
0.45
0.16
1.26
0.19
0.65
0.14
0.16
0.29
0.74
0.46
Aug .
0.08
0.12
0.00
0.35
0.36
0.19
0.13
0.30
0.45
0.19
0.16
1.02
0.11
0.15
0.47
0.22
0.52
0.19
0.33
0.60
0.09
1.64
0.15
0.55
0.12
0.20
0.40
0.55
Sep.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.05
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.13
0.07
1.44
0.05
0.10
0.14
0.18
0.16
0.17
0.08
0.10
0.07
0.00
1.14
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.44
Oct.
0.19
0.06
0.31
0.27
0.05
0.20
0.07
0.18
0.82
0.27
1.98
0.00
0.17
0.24
0.24
0.18
0.30
0.12
0.22
0.21
0.13
1.32
0.07
0.19
0.05
0.26
0.14
0.16
0.78
Nov.
0.36
0.06
0.22
0.19
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.16
0.31
0.17
0.27
0.91
0.10
0.13
0.20
0.17
0.07
0.23
0.18
0.18
0.12
0.00
0.90
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.09
0.21
0.11
0.26
Dec.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.12
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.11
0.11
2.00
0.19
0.26
0.29
0.26
0.22
0.27
0.22
0.25
0.28
0.05
0.28
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.05
0.23
0.26
Avg.
0.11
0.09
0.12
0.32
0.18
0.18
0.05
0.44
0.85
0.22
0.21
2.65
0.14
0.17
0.42
0.57
0.22
0.88
0.25
0.29
0.57
0.08
1.30
0.20
0.40
0.11
0.10
0.36
0.45
0.72
aNonurban.
157
-------
Table 6-17 (continued). LEAD CANDLE SULFATION RATE, NATIONAL
AIR SURVEILLANCE NETWORKS, 19&7 (mg S03/100 cm2-day)
Station
Oregon
Eugene
Medford
Pennsylvania
A 1 toon a
Bethlehem
Johnstown
Lancaster
Phi ladel phi a
(CAMP)
South Carol ina
Columbia
Tennessee
Knoxv i 1 1 e
Memph i s
Texas
Houston
Vermont
Burl ing ton
Orange County
Vi rginia
Shenandoah Parka
R i chrnond
Roanoke
Wyom i ng
Cheyenne
Yellowstone Park3
Jan.
0.07
0.47
0.44
0.77
2.61
0.36
0.55
0.16
0.25
0.98
0.46
0.06
0.39
0.25
0.05
0.00
Feb.
0.10
0.10
0.58
0.62
0.85
2.00
0.14
0.62
0.28
0.17
0.77
0.35
0.15
0.59
0.46
0.00
0.06
Mar.
0.78
0.92
2.49
0.20
0.26
0.75
0.46
0.95
Apr.
0.21
0.10
0.73
0.75
0.91
0.80
2.29
0.11
0.58
0.31
0.17
0.82
0.93
0.10
0.61
0.25
0.10
0.00
May
0.07
0.09
0.62
0.58
0.68
1.11
2.37
0.15
0.45
0.35
0.11
0.34
0.40
0.05
0.54
0.05
0.10
June
0.15
0.16
0.18
0.39
0.22
1.10
2.10
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.25
0.42
0.25
0.18
0.43
0.14
0.16
0.20
July
0.09
0.16
0.19
0.34
0.26
0.79
1.64
0.14
0.36
0.65
0.14
0.17
0.14
0.20
0.13
0.18
0.15
Aug.
0.13
0.17
0.23
0.35
0.30
0.56
1.44
0.11
0.12
0.52
0.12
0.16
0.11
0.42
0.07
0.18
0.15
Sep.
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.19
0.00
0.11
1.07
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.06
0.09
0.00
0.11
0.15
0.00
0.06
0.08
Oct.
0.14
0.00
0.29
0.23
0.25
0.24
1.30
0.07
0.17
0.00
0.25
0.19
0.28
0.24
0.29
0.17
0.71
0.06
Nov.
0.11
0.00
0.24
0.20
0.06
0.15
0.55
0.19
0.28
0.09
0.12
0.10
0.17
0.19
0.18
0.11
0.20
0.06
Dec.
0.12
0.00
0.30
0.06
0.21
0.15
0.28
0.17
0.12
0.21
0.25
0.12
0.27
0.25
0.00
0.00
Avg.
0.11
0.08
0.34
0.44
0.35
0.67
1.67
0.15
0.34
0.25
0.16
0.47
0.31
0.16
0.42
0.18
0.15
0.08
Nonurban.
158
-------
Table 6-18. SOILING INDEX, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(Cods/1000 lineal feet)
CHICAGO
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
28
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
2.7*
2.62
2.31
3.11
2.03
1.73
1.98
1.5*
1.85
2.05
2.70
2.68
3.10
1.70
l.*5
2.12
2.0Z
3.17
2.41
2.01
2.06
1.60
1.99
1.7Z
1.5*
0,91
1.52
2.12
1.29
0.82
2.30
2.00
Feb.
1.13
2.06
2.0*
ilso
1,1.
1.13
1.60
2.29
2.00
1,26
1.26
2.52
2.46
2.09
1.53
2.70
1 9«
2.30
1.8»
1.79
1.7*
1.81
2.15
2.08
2.29
1.77
2.*7
1.77
1.8*
March
1.85
2.96
2.18
0.8*
».53
2.09
l'9'
1.80
1.66
2.13
1.9-
0.78
i.e*
1.42
1.73
2,01
1,86
i.86
1.7Z
Z.*7
1.6*
>.9«
1.52
1.0*
1.99
1.45
1.11
1.17
1.0*
1.21
1.00
1.62
April
1.2*
0.90
0.92
i.*s
2,*2
1.7*
1.03
1.87
0,83
0.9*
0,76
0.83
1.27
0.70
0.88
1.15
0,66
0.90
0.69
1.27
1.33
0,89
0.6.
1.51
1.70
1.61
1.30
1 S9
1.20
0.8*
1.13
May
1,07
i.oe
1.32
0,78
0,79
0.70
0,67
1.20
1,60
l.*8
1.37
0.7.
0.90
0.83
1.53
1.61
l.*0
0.99
0.77
0.70
0.68
0.72
1.3C
1.23
1.19
0.9*
0.53
O.*l
0.70
0.»6
0.61
.93
June
0,6*
1.10
0.96
1.03
1.07
0.97
0.98
0.53
0^77
0.*8
0.39
0.66
0.**
0.67
0.56
0.61
0.26
0.12
0.1*
0.27
0.1*
.5*
My
0.6*
o.*«
0.62
O.*l
0.*9
0.62
0,70
1.07
0.58
0.90
1.35
0.73
0.77
0,75
0,*9
0.67
0.83
0.92
0.67
0.65
1.35
0.66
0,*B
0.75
0,8*
1.2*
0.82
0,58
1.13
0.76
0.81
.71
Aug.
0.90
1.12
1.07
0.60
0,89
0.68
0.58
0.55
0.81
0.59
0.53
0.83
0.91
0.99
0.8*
0.8*
0.55
0.59
0.73
0,55
0.61
0.50
0.50
0.53
1.00
0.8*
0.58
0.55
.68
Sepl.
0.82
0.51
0.4*
0.55
0.56
1.28
0.9*
1.69
0.47
0.23
0.28
1.0*
0.81
1.18
0,95
0,90
0.56
0.8*
1.09
0,88
0.79
0.5Z
1.06
o.es
1,19
0,71
0.81
0.75
1.35
1.32
.79
Ocl.
1.68
0.93
0,93
0.89
0.59
0,59
0,8*
0,6*
1.11
1.27
t.*l
2.13
1.57
2.06
1.35
0.89
0.98
0.99
1.38
0.85
1.17
l.*7
1.09
0.66
i.oz
1.36
1.38
1.59
1.37
1.61
1.03
1.13
Nov.
1.21
1.18
l.*0
Ul*
0.85
1.60
2.07
1.59
1.6*
1.60
1.0*
0.85
1.31
1.2*
1.59
1.15
1.70
1.16
1.17
1.22
1.92
0.9*
l.*9
1.39
1.18
1.1.
l.*B
1.96
1.23
1.31
Dec.
1.78
1.10
1.13
l.*8
1.92
2.23
1.2Z
1.31
0.77
0.62
l.*5
1.5*
1.27
l.*»
1,57
i.e.
1,60
1,46
1.72
2.26
1.32
1.32
1.29
1.60
1.55
2.01
2.39
1.71
2.15
1.37
1.23
1.49
CINCINNATI
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2.
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
2.29
3.39
1,75
1,64
2.11
1,15
2.1*
1.90
1.83
2.57
2.7.
1.44
1.02
2.18
1.18
1,72
2.59
2.48
2,10
1,75
1,61
1.55
1.51
1.97
l.l*
1.00
1.63
1.3*
2.58
1.81
Feb.
3.06
1.41
1.40
1.60
1.8*
1,35
1,95
3,18
2,59
2.01
1,11
1.**
2,**
1.98
l.*8
1,18
1.60
2,47
2.03
1.8*
2,33
1.78
1.49
2.15
ill*
1.81
March
1,61
U65
1,75
1.74
2.42
2.13
2.30
1.33
0.73
0.72
0.83
0.86
0.99
1.69
1.92
1.82
1.48
0.79
1.32
1.22
1.42
April
0.8Z
0,55
0.73
1.01
0.76
0.63
1.43
0.5»
0.6.
0.80
0.8*
0.82
0^37
0.53
0.96
0.87
1.10
1,25
1.8*
1.79
1.03
.8.
May
0.9*
1.13
U46
1.2Z
1.84
0.91
0.72
0.85
0.80
1.60
0.79
0.89
1.07
1.09
1.10
1.13
0.75
0.86
0,73
0.59
0.54
1.38
0.58
1.56
0.89
0.74
0.34
0.56
.92
June
0.51
0^76
0.63
0.67
1.20
1.07
0.81
0.86
0.97
0.90
1.05
1.19
1.36
1.72
1.29
1.07
1.54
0.76
0.99
1.47
0.88
0.75
1.42
1.29
0.51
0.99
1.64
0.98-
0.56
1.16
.9.
July
1. 10
0.41
0.50
0.58
1.35
0.58
0.67
0,55
0.66
0.65
0.55
0.76
0.68
0.51
0.91
0.8.
1.81
1.19
1.41
1.08
1.03
0.58
0.34
0.58
0.48
1.03
0.74
0.61
0.60
0.89
0.62
.73
Aug.
1.01
0.73
0.73
0.46
0.42
0.9*
0.87
0.81
0.62
0.43
0.69
0.59
0.93
1.39
1.37
1.23
1.2*
0.73
o.*z
0.*9
0.98
1.23
0,5*
0.6Z
0.47
0.30
0.58
0.96
0.81
0.39
.71
Sept.
0.57
0.71
1.09
1.23
1.25
1.39
2,00
1.79
0.91
0,46
0,49
0.73
0,90
1.05
1.69
,8.
.29
.62
,06
.1*
0.53
0.76
0.76
0.59
1.80
1,43
0^87
1.02
0.88
1.03
Oct.
0.73
1.35
1.57
1.32
1.10
0.68
0.76
0.72
0.81
0.80
l.ZZ
2.52
Nov.
1.05
0.8*
0.50
0.53
0.88
1.26
2.52
1.35
1.33
0.87
0.49
0.75
0.81
1.29
1.21
0.63
0.62
0.85
1.50
0.75
1.62
0.97
0.8*
0.6*
0.96
US*
1.00
i.oo
Dec.
1.00
1.36
1.06
2.18
2.05
1.90
0.9*
1.52
0.81
1.00
1.00
0.86
1.21
0,86
0.87
1.1.
1.44
1.09
1.93
1.87
0.81
0.49
0.8*
1.16
0.76
0.75
0.92
ll*9
1.42
1.20
1.15
159
-------
Table 6-18 (continued). SOILING INDEX, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(Cote/1000 lineal feet)
DENVER
DATE
5
'
10
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
Feb.
0.68
0.56
0,71
0.58
0.65 ,
0.8*
iloi
0.99
0.60
1.07
1.00
0.72
0.67
1.18
1.61
0.98
0.93
0.7*
.81
March
1.31
1.37
0.99
0,86
0.81
1.1Z
1.18
1.80
1.29
1.4*
0.77
0.95
1.05
1.26
0.99
1.27
0.80
0.69
0.88
0.80
0.88
0.77
0.62
0.69
0.72
1.17
0.55
0.51
1.03
.93
April
0.82
0.7»
0,87
1.37
1.02
0.72
0.9*
0.66
0,48
0.62
0.5*
0.57
0.88
0.8*
0.67
o.*o
0.81
0.97
0.71
0.63
0.68
0.71
O.S6
1.0*
0.82
0.9*
1.02
0.58
0.56
0,23
.70
May
0.62
0.6*
0.70
0.77
0.72
0.63
0.60
0.86
0.90
0.56
0.71
0.78
0.63
0.40
June
July
Auo.
0.78
0.83
o,*o
0.73
Sept.
1.02
0.60
0.71
0.37
0.87
1.07
0.98
0.6*
0.68
0.65
0.72
0.65
0.56
0.76
1.10
0.60
0.46
0,3*
0.46
0.*2
1.22
0,73
0.88
0.96
0.51
1.00
0.86
1.08
0.79
.70
Oct.
0.*7
1.09
1.3*
0.76
1.10
0.65
0.65
0.68
0.97
0.96
0.9*
1.03
0.50
1.1*
0.9Z
1.87
1.10
0.68
1.08
0.75
1.6*
0.65
1.25
0.80
0.72
0.89
0.95
.90
Nov.
1.16
1.39
1.39
1.0*
0,77
1.38
1.3*
1.37
0.92
1.06
1.97
l.*8
0.99
1.65
1.55
1.21
2.21
2.12
2.07
1.36
Dec. '
1,03
1.31
0.99
l.*7
1.65
l.H
2.19
1.47
0,68
0.79
0.90
1.00
1.47
1.38
1.90
1.55
0.85
2.00
2.37
1.42
1.28
1.94
1,38
0.58
0.63
2.68
1.33
1.26
1.93
1.53
1.76
1.36
PHILADELPHIA
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
0,50
0,26
0,69
0.72
0,77
0.57
1.08
1.2*
1.00
1.03
0.40
0,24
0.27
0.41
0.5*
Feb.
0,80
l.*6
0.85
1.67
1.16
l.*9
1.42
1.46
2.60
2.30
1.78
0,80
2.U
2.58
2.45
1.1*
1.68
1.60
1.58
March
1.65
1,00
1.01
1.32
0.95
1.30
1.50
1.69
l.*7
0.72
0.87
0.83
0.52
O.*0
0.53
0.36
0.59
1.15
0.90
0.61
1.10
0.61
0.43
0.57
0.51
0,70
0.79
0.81
0,79
.85
April
0.77
0.90
0.79
0.46
0.95
1,16
0,78
0,57
0.77
0.46
0.22
0.44
0,30
Ol37
0.51
May
0.55
0.31
0.28
0.30
0.71
0.60
0.42
0.73
0.58
0.41
0.68
0.38
0.56
O.Si.
0.50
0,47
0.86
0.57
0.56
0^6
0,17
0.40
0.47
oUz
0,43
0°3»
0^49
0.23
0.32
,40
June
0.39
0.63
0.38
0.60
0.86
0,54
0.55
0.36
0.45
0.62
0.43
0,6*
0,66
0.32
0.48
0.51
0.31
0.27
0.3»
0.50
0,72
0,77
0,79
0.44
0,45
0^8
0.76
0 49
0^7
.48
July
0,46
0.34
0.40
0.55
0.43
0.79
0.59
0.55
0.38
0.61
0^7
0.51
0.39
0,37
0.27
0.6S
0.86
0^63
.46
Aug.
0.66
0.78
0.43
0.42
0,65
0.55
0.41
0.56
0.83
1.30
1.33
1.18
0,79
0.61
0.70
0.63
0.77
0.85
0.42
0.48
0.55
0.75
0.38
.65
Sept.
0.31
0.36
0.36
0.43
0.73
0.91
0.94
1.09
0.54
0.49
0.66
1,28
!.*•
1.01
0.47
0.27
0,55
1.01
1.01
1.00
0.43
0.44
0.48
0.63
0,56
0.82
0,4Z
0.38
0.43
0.49
.62
Oct.
0.65
1.19
1,55
1.22
1.02
0.58
0.57
0,50
0.84
0,78
0.74
0,99
0,78
0,80
0,69
1.15
0.4S
0,62
0.77
0.86
0.80
1.19
1.18
0.61
0.82
1.06
0.58
0.55
.78
Nov.
1.59
1.13
0.78
1.33
1.15
0.72
1.15
0,97
1.46
0.46
0.66
0.69
1.01
1.02
0.72
1.08
1.13
.95
Dec.
0.99
0.9*
0.70
0.98
1.37
1.3*
0,8*
0.95
1.51
0.31
0.51
1.8*
1.53
1.26
0.88
1.S2
2.33
1.58
1.17
1.24
1.65
0.56
0.32
0.79
0.94
0.93
0.97
1.01
0.98
1.18
1.9*
I.OB
160
-------
Table 6-18 (continued). SOILING INDEX, DAILY AVERAGES, 1967
(CohWlOOO lineal feet)
ST. LOUIS
DATE
5
10
15
16
IB
20
21
25
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
Feb.
0.80
1.47
1.15
0.73
0.77
0,89
0.70
0.86
0,71
1.07
0.58
1.17
0.81
March
1.05
0.93
1.47
0,78
0.63
0.82
1.18
1,09
1.0*
1.24
0.76
0.81
1.34
1.16
0,6*
0.98
0.65
0.94
0.62
1.04
0.77
1.1*
1.18
l.Ol
1.42
0,5*
0.71
1.1»
1.21
0.91
0.71
.92
April
0.59
0,54
0,64
0.93
1.00
O.S2
0.62
0,81
0.56
0.66
1.09
1.21
0.83
0,66
0.4S
0,5*
0,48
0.57
0.76
0,9*
0.84
0.40
0.41
0.73
0.69
0.73
1.01
1.31
0.55
0.41
.68
May
0.6*
0.59
0.89
1.01
0.96
0,60
0.53
0,59
0.7S
0,83
0,52
0,79
0.82
0.61
0.46
0,90
1.00
0.94
0.68
0.65
0.64
1.43
1.02
0.90
0.89
0.77
0^4
0,50
0'.65
0.48
1.09
.71
June
0.93
1.03
1,11
0,67
0,82
0,64
0.61
0,82
0,81
0,55
0,53
0,69
0,83
1.22
1.12
0.96
0.57
0.40
0,70
0,75
0,48
0,45
0,69
0.49
0,41
0,95
0,72
0.54
ijoz
0.82
.70
July
0.46
0,24
0,31
0.25
0.48
0,73
0,69
0.42
0,37
0,38
0.49
0.53
0.38
o!33
0.50
0.33
0.40
0.46
0.59
Ol35
0.45
0.29
0.2*
Ol29
0.27
0,3*
0^9
0.29
0.33
0.20
0.20
.33
AUO.
0.30
0.25
0.16
0.27
0.27
0.22
0.30
0.72
0.39
0.68
0.63
0.67
0.91
0.96
0.97
1.01
1.07
0.85
0.41
0.59
0.90
1.02
0.8*
0.63
.58
Sept.
0.84
0.86
0,67
1.1°
1.20
0.95
0.99
1,00
0,70
o'*9
0,71
1.30
0.89
0.90
1.07
0.74
0.92
0^3
1.03
0.99
0.55
0.72
0.84
0.50
0.88
0.90
0.49
0.52
0.96
0,6*
.79
Oct.
0,75
0.99
o.e>
0.98
0.68
0.82
0.65
0.35
0.8*
0.49
1. 10
1.19
1.23
0.93
0.72
0.89
1.39
0.6*
0,89
0.57
1.21
1.20
.82
Nov.
0.96
0.96
0.76
0.74
0.51
1.16
1.69
1.29
1.76
1.14
0.87
0.50
0.83
0.86
1.45
1.18
0.77
0.60
1.28
1.46
2,17
1.08
0.51
1.37
1.05
1.10
0,90
1.43
1.63
1.10
1.05
Dec.
0.95
0.88
0.75
1.26
1.48
1.32
0.85
1.58
1.38
0.72
0.86
0,99
0,88
0.83
0,8*
1.05
0.71
1.38
1.90
1.48
0.80
0.65
0.70
1.01
1.53
0.97
1.26
2.08
1.22
1.11
1.06
WASHINGTON, D. C.
DATE
1
3
S
10
11
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
30
31
Monthly mean
Jan.
1.15
1*10
1.33
1.25
1.03
1.17
1.08
0,89
1,18
U46
0.73
1.06
1.48
1.15
0.87
0,90
0.90
0,98
1.17
1.32
1.36
1,15
1.31
0.82
0.45
0.59
0.76
1.71
1.03
Feb.
2.9*
1.19
0,99
1,16
0,78
1.07
1.27
0.82
0.63
1.37
1.05
0.90
1.0*
0.91
0.82
0.90
0.93
0.70
0.60
1.08
0.80
T_w_
March
0.68
1. 10
1.1*
1.13
1.68
1.43
0,80
1.14
1.15
1.1*
0.94
0,72
0.65
0,79
0.58
0.61
0.80
0.56
0.49
0.87
0.95
0.89
0.84
0.75
0.66
0.84
0.50
0.66
0^7
0.61
0.68
.80
April
0.73
0.86
0.63
0,47
0.9»
1.09
0.67
0.45
0.56
0.63
0,37
0.47
0.66
0,87
0.55
0,72
0.68
0.47
0.46
0.83
1.20
0,46
0.29
0,67
0.73
1.22
0.62
0.70
.62
May
0.99
0.64
0.72
0.68
0.64
0.39
0.91
0.63
0.73
1.14
0.46
2-"
0.69
0.74
0.68
i;i6
0.84
0.81
0.60
0.39
0.74
0.73
0.83
0.56
0.60
0.55
0.60
0.68
0.43
0.69
.6*
June
1.00
0.86
0.68
0.39
0.70
0,48
0|*3
0,56
o:*3
0.45
0.28
0,76
0,32
0.30
0.3*
0.31
0.35
0.23
0.35
0.32
0.32
July
0.44
0.31
0.21
0.26
0.61
0*32
0.25
0.31
0.56
0.35
0.23
0.21
0.29
0.23
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
1.18
0.98
1.26
1.99
1,75
0,82
tU*
0.85
1.49
2.20
2.56
Nov.
1.54
1.37
1.34
1.01
0.77
1.16
1.12
1.41
2.18
2.94
1.69
0.97
0.98
1.18
1.73
1.32
0.80
1.06
1.60
2.0s
0.97
1.40
1.34
2.47
1.83
1.23
1.78
2.02
1.4Z
Dec.
1.77
2.66
1.58
1.76
3.62
2.93
2.51
3.13
2.36
0.96
1.08
1.78
4.08
2.77
1.47
1.14
2.44
2.37
2.17
2.51
2.08
1.40
1.68
1.09
1.68
1.28
1.61
1.80
il25
1.66
1.54
1.95
161
-------
APPENDIX.
Air Quality Data Sampling Sites
-------
APPENDIX.
AIR QUALITY DATA SAMPLING SITES
This appendix contains a listing of air quality data sampling station sites
used to gather samples for the National Air Quality Data Bank. Each site in the
list is described in terms of its state, county, city, number, street address,
supporting agency, type, population class or topographic category, and height of
sampler above ground level. The list is included to assist the reader in his
understanding and knowledge of the entire sampling network.
The format used to describe sites, along with an explanation of its parts,
is followed by the alphabetical listing of sites by state.
State
City Station address Typea County
Site number Supporting agency Population class^3 Height0
a
The type of site is identified by one or more of the following symbols:
C Commercial
I Industrial
R Residential
N Nonurban
S - Suburban
* Not defined
Population class (urban stations) or topographic category (nonurban):
Urban Nonurban
Population class 1 3, 000, 000 or more
2 1 to 3,000, 000 Atlantic Coast
3 700, 000 to 1,000, 000 Desert
4 400, 000 to 700, 000 Farmland
5 100,000 to 400,000 Forest
6 50, 000 to 100, 000 Great Lakes Coast
7 25, 000 to 50, 000 Gulf Coast
8 10, 000 to 25, 000 Mountain
9 Less than 10,000 Pacific Coast
CHeight of the sampler above ground level, in feet.
(*-- indicates information not available)
Figure A-1. Site description format used by national air quality data bank.
165
-------
ALAJ4-A
Bl«"lN'.HAV
HTE I'l UMY --to «'J9 JENTAL «LOG. 6l<» SO 19TH 5T TYI>E- KC COUNTY- J
JtfFE>iSr,'l roy.MlY HFALTH I>F.P«PT<!•* « JfcFF DA^IS AVE TYt'E- RC COUNTY-MONTGOMERY
"0'IT5C"EPY COUNTY HEALTH OEfArtTMFNT POP CL-5 «0
ALASKA
A^CHC'»^GE
SITE *2 GR -k'CHOPA^E A9E« HLT-1 DEPT Z17 F 5T TYPE- C
c^t-ATtR A,,CHOS«GE AREA B-VOUGH HFALTH OEPAPT'^NT POP CL-T i<»
elTF 03 52? E *TH TYPE-(«)
POP CL-7 (*>
SITF 01 FAlK"Ai«KS DOST OFFtCt 3RD ANO CUSHMAN TYPE- IRC
ASCTIC rtFALTH "ESEAkCH LA^ORAT^RY POP Ct-8 3
ARIZONA
GRAND CANYON NAT PK
SITE 01 VISITOR CENTER GRAND CANYON VILLAGE RES TYPE- N GRAND CANYON PARK
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DESERT 4
HARICOPA COUuTY
SITfc Cl "102 N IHJ''UY MTN ROAD. bC"TTsr»«LF, AnIZ TYPE- R COUNTY-MARICOPA
»UM,.|Y fT'l ASTRONOMICAL UHSFH + U^nH PA9AOISE VALLEY STATION POP CL-9 3
pHCEiiTX
SITE 02 CO HLTH DEBT iJLDG Itt'd" £ W005FVELT ST TYPE- R COUNTY-MA^tCOPA
HEALTH DtPARiMFm pop CL-* is
TlCSCN
SITt 11 UMIVtSSiTf OF ARIZONA «T" »VF. » ?.<*n ST TYPE- RC COUNTY-PIMA
PEPAPT^c'iT v* CIVIL epi<5i"'fFRn(i, UNIVERSITY CF ARIZONA POP CL-? i
ARKANSAS
EL nrpAno
SITC 01 POST CFFTCF ""LDG "Ajri * JAC-UTION CO-1TK')L CO'-'-'I^SIOM POP CL-7 80
LITTLE ROCK
SITF. 01 POLICE ANO COURTS "LOG. 700 tl -IARKHAM TYPE- C COUNTY-Pt)LA5L<-UTIDN COf.TR'iL CO«"ISSION POP CL-5 40
CCUNTY
SITE fH FO"EST RA,,r,FB STA, OIIACHITA HATL FCREST TYPE- N OUACHITA NATL FOREST
U STATES FOWE^THY SEHvlCt FOREST 3
WFiT "cwpHjs
SITE 01 FI»L STATION Mo 1 SEVENTH » THOMPSON TY"E- RC COUNTY-CPI TTEi>lOEM
AR
-------
Lf.T CCUMTY
01 TRT-iUAl1! I.ISHT STATION
Ui'ilTFJ STiTfS COAST G^A
TYPE-
TRINIUin LK,HT STATION
firs'! CST 5
Lr.Mf, B<=ACH
SITC 01 riYT HLTH riEPT ciLOr,, ^S^ PINK «»£NUE TYPE- RC COU,')TY-LflS
CITY LFPI^TIFNT OF PljHLIC Ht«LTH pn? Ct-5 25
L<-S AN-.FLES
•HTE 01 LACrtPCO M,J BLUR *3<, s sA'i PEnpn cj TYPE- 1C COUNTY-LOS ANGFLES
L n CCU.'ITY AM POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT POP CL-2 30
MC.'.TEPFY
SITF ni
PRrFFS«iIO..»L tlLOG 151 "Ai'ISOM
»o"iFKEv - SANTA c»uz uNtritu
SITE 01 CO'MTY HFrtnQtlARTE«s
PAS4DE A
SITE 01
<»99
EFT TYPE- H
POLLUTIO"! CONTROL DISTRICT
ST TYPE- 1C
POP CL-" 65
pop ct-5
H6/ FAST »TUA STRFET
L ° ccuiiTr AIR POLLUTION
TY"E~ «C COUNTY-LOS AM5FLES
DISTRICT POP CL-S 5
REUDIN'-
fO!)liTY HF^LTH Of.oT HLOC
SHASTA COi!NTY
rOSflTAL LE TYPE- S COUNTY-SHASTA
POP CL-8 *
SITE 01
rOHi.TY H04fi OLPT COMPLEX 3U F. -U tSAL ST TYPE- I COUNTY- -10>ITEREY
«0•'T':KF.Y-<;A^4TA CRU^ UNlFlEn AI" "CLLUTIO'l COMTRUL DEPARTMENT POP CL-7 3
SITE f'l
CITY P03LIC LIBRARY, b?0 E STRFET
COl'.lTy OFpHRTMFMT If PUBLIC
S/1H FRANC ISCC
SITE 01 UK»LTH DFPT RUILOr'& 101 OPOVE STREET
c.A-1 FKA'.|CI«;CO HEALTH P
TYPE- C COUNTY-SAN DIEGO
POP CL-*
TYPE- C COUNTY-5Ai| FRANCISCO
POP CL-3 32
5AH JP 15
AHVA1A
SITE "I
76^2 G9A"DVlE.v AV.
HFAL1H I)EPART«E"T
TYPE- C COUNTY-JEFFERSON
POP CL-8 15
AURORA
SITE 01
TYPE- R
.
TRl-CCUNTt HEALTH UtP/>.»T<"E"|T
POP CL-7 20
5ITF 01
02
CC1UKIHOUSE 13TH * SPRUCE STREETS TYPE- C COUNTY-IOJLDetJ
O STATE HEAl.TH ntP^HTME^T POP Cf7 30
HL«LTH DEPT «LOG
80ULOLR Hu»lTH OEP^«T"ENT
TYPE- R COUNTY-BSJLDER
PHP CL-7 25
BRCOMFIELD
SITE 01
NO 8 GAj-nr™ OFFICE Ct'ITE«
L^t" HLALTH OEPA«T-'FNT
TYPE- C COUNTY-^JLOER
POP CL-9 20
MTF 03 WFTCKEV T^MSFER 2O5 M «IU &RA«OF STREET TYPE- I COUNTY-EL PASO
" " COLJRAOO STATt HEALTH OEPARIItNT POP CL-& 20
DMTF"FP*RT'-'EVT
POP CL-*
167
-------
MTE "<•
SITE "5
S1TP .'6
SITT "7
f nrvVEK BUILDl\fi OEP'-P
SF''LD PLAIT FAST 51ST + (-OAiNLLTN STS
f Oc^VFR SUII DPR '>EPART"E"T
>'0«TH "I S("H10L
CI TV Cf neMVFK BuIL"I;.S OEP^RT-'E"
HULL P"QT- C" S105 t 3."TM AVEV'lE
CITY CF OF^'VFK ^UII.DI'.K "EP^PT^E''
COI U STATF HF<H I'LPI
ii«Tt HtAi-TH C
F I1TH AyENjF
TYl'E-
TYP£-
TY"E-
TYPE-
TYPE-
I COUNTY-OF1VER
POP
I COUNT Y-OFNVpR
POP
R COUNTY-DFNVER
POP
c COUNTY-DENVER
POP
PO"
CL-4
CL-4
CL-4
CL-4
CL-4
25
10
35
25
45
OwL FI'F STATfVI InT" ST + 2^0 AVENUE TYP£-
"Ano iT"Tt HEALTH ?E'">RTMF.«'T
MTfc 01
FrKT COLLINS
48''' SCUTH 6pD«L)wAv
COI URAno STATE HEAI TH r)E""»T"t"T
HEAOQiiAPTFRS 23Rw»L"UT ST
HEALTH DtP-M>TMFMT
CF.iT0*L
c COUMTY-LA PLATA
POP CL-B 10
POP CL-7 20
C COUNTY-LARIMER
POP CL-7 30
SITfc
1 COUR1H-IDSE 87H •
Cni 0°AO? STATt HtALTH O
TY"E-
POP CL-9
SITE
5ITF
111 Tt"TH "Vf-NJE
JE^FFRsn^1 COUNTY HEALTH
lUNCTTO'I
TYPE-
I COUNTY-,IEF(-£RSON
POP CL-9 20
CO HLTH OEPT HLI>G 5l5 PATTERSON AvE
COLOP-00 i>TATt HEALTH DEP'-PTME^T
TYPE- S COUNTY-^ESA
POP CL-8 4
SITE 12
».C' l>
7TH STMEFT + 9T^ AyFMuF TY°E-
FY qEALTH
STATION 2, 23oO » RFSF.RVJIR ROAI5 TYP£-
C1(J"TY HEALTH
R COUNTY-vlELD
POP CL-7 45
POP CL-7 4
26" SOUTH KIPLING ITHLFT
57ATt HEALTH nEP
TYPfc-
S COUNTY-JFFFERSON
POP CL-8 15
snr
KA,,lTli S
SITE ni
C1IY nALl *TH » KI"8A|T STRtETS
"0'.'L"bP C'-IJNIY HEAI TH OEP/.RTMCMT
VA'UTOU Av/F'Uit » CFNTKAL <;TRFFT
PL t'ASO CullNTY HEALTH nt
MESA VERDE NATIONAL PK
SITE 01 MESA VEROE NATIONAL
NATIONAL PARK SERVICt
TYPF.- c COUNTY-BOJLOFR
POP CL-8 30
TYPE- c COUNTY-FX PASO
POP CL-9 30
TYPE- N MESA VEROE NATIONAL PARK
MOUNTAIN Zl
PLE^LO
SITE .11
SITE 02
SITE "3
sue IH
SITE "5
u'Kn'IPACiHRE STRf-ET
HEALTH OE
38
PJFULO r!Llu I'tPT Bl.iPG 151 CENT»A| i'Al«i|
COLJP.AOO <;TATt HtAI. TH n£PARIM£NT
STA
PJf-JLC HF".| TH
* rv««is FlHt 5TA FVM5 * ME"ia ST
RAOO STATE HF.ALTH OE»">PTIE"T
bTA "ONFOPT 8LVE + I IBtPTY I ANE
OEpflPTMF*lT
* 6TH STS.
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
c COUNTY-IONTROSF:
POP CL-9 25
C COUNTY-PUEBLO
POP CL-6 15
c COUNTY-PUEBLO
POP CL-6 5
COUNTY-PDEHLO
POP CL-6 20
R COUNTY-PUEBLO
POP CL-6 5
C HFAtTH
R COUNTY-PUEBLO
POP CL-6 5
168
-------
SITE fit HPL STATION -? 7TH ST * SA'n'i FT AyENJE TYPE- I COUNTY-"J£*LO
PUt-oLC HEALTH OCPAoT'lfiT POP CL-4 20
STtRLI'.G
SITE 01 S0n|n 3RD * ASH ST°fcRTS TYPE- C COUNTY-LOoA-j
"'OKTHEAST COLOPAOC HFALT" OEP>«»T"ENT POP CU-t 25
TPIMin.ir;
SITE 11 OV.;EI-.< IAL Fine STA C.T'IKC-CIAL . *AIN ST TY»E- c COUNTY-LAS ANITAS
LAb A,• IV.AS-HIJEOFAMO ni^TRlCT HFAi TH OEPT POP CL-8 *0
CONNECTrCUT
SIT? "I FII'L 3ull.TtNfa< 274 MlODLf: STREFT TYOE- C COUNTY-FAIRFIELO
CO-'i.rCTICjT STME otpronFNT OF uEdLTH POP CL-5 5-i
HARTFORD
«1TF. 01 101L1MT3N IT (HOOF OF l.A^ OIV ^L^C) TYPE- C COUNTY-HA UFDHO
CO^'fiFCTICuT ST^IE OEPT 0*" HtALTH LABORATORY DIVISION POP CL-5 60
Ufa BRITAIN
SITE 02 "II'JLE ATLANTIC TRANSP C1 °7ft -lEST ^AIN TYPE- C COUNTY-HA^TFOR'1
CO-'.'IECTICUT STATE i)tPAPT'"(:f|T Of uEALTH POP CL-6 25
NE'S HAVEN
SITE 01 "ULLAki) PUTL'-T'o TYPE- 1C COIJNTY-'IF'I HA\/Ei)
CUT LicPAKT^FNT OF PUB| 1C -IcAtTH PIP CL-5 5R
CE"l°Al Fl"E STATpN, *5< "A j«' STRFET TYPE- C COUNTY-FA IRFIELO
si "IE nEp'-PTMF%|i n|- HEALTH POP CL-S So
1 RY
SITF 01 CITY H»LI , 215 GRAMO STWfFT TYPE- C COUNTY-L'TCqF[ELD
CO''|.FCTICHT ST«IE OEPioT-FMI ^^ "EALTH POP CL-5 55
MTE °1 H« "I i-r'< -.nViflAv HOnK ' «TI wlL"l I"71" REFDGF TYPE- N BOMBAY HOD< NAT REFUSE
«!-' PCI.LHT'O" AjTHORIlv, STATt «"ApD OF HFALTH FARML4I>|1 11
's'lTE15"! IHS6CTC»V. EXPFR«. FAr«« S2I S. COLLEGE A» TYPE- IRC COUNTY-'IE-V CASTLE
A!" BCLLiiTTO" AUTHORITY, STATI «"Aao OF "EALTH POP CL-
'si->fe'iio||Ro OF HEALTH PQP C|--'' 12
6JlTtScILLE "I" SC.UTM..FST <.TH AVt-IME TYPE- RC COUNTV.»L»CMU»
' FL'VICA ST"TF -fO-VRO OF HtALTH POP CL-7 15
JACKSONVILLE TvOF- C fDLItJTV-D I\/A|
= ITE r.l 135 PlvEBSlOe "VE TY°E c "UNTY-JJV L
FLH^IU« ST-TE 30"Hr> OF HEALTH pOP CL-5 00
"?" "' 1^-^'t^nEn "Pe-t" C°UNTY^0t - CL-5 ,.,
ISt6of*"1 W* ^T^L..^ FtnRinft eTflTE BoAR-^-HE^T^ORI" -L 6 i'J
169
-------
TALLAHASSEE
SITE 01
HAVEN
SITE 01
32-> E GATiiFS STREET
AGENCY W
22>> AVENUF o N w
FLORIDA 5T*TF »0»RD OF HEALTH
TYPE-C«) COUNTY-LF3N
TYPE- RC COUNTY-POLK
POP CU-7 (»)
POP CL-8 15
GEORGIA
ALBANY
SITE 01
30ft FLINT STREET
GEOrtGI« DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HfcALTH
TYPE-
C COUNTY-DOJGHERTY
POP CL-6 12
ATLANTA
SITE 01
AUGUSTA
SITE 01
FULTON COUNTY HEALTH PEPT 99 BUTLER ST SE TYPE- ic COUNTY-FULTON
FULTON COu"TY HEALTH
POP CL-* 20
CO HEALTH DEPT' 1001 BAILIE DP TYPE-
DEPARTMENT OF PU«LlC HEALTH
RC COUNTY-RICHMOND
POP CL-6 18
BRUNSWICK
SITE 01
CCLUW5US
SITE 01
GAINESVILLE
SITE 01
LYONS
SITE 01
MACON
SITE 01
GLY.)M CNTY HLTH OEPT, MANSFIELD STREET TYPE-
GEOKGI« DfcHARTMENT OF PUBLIC HF-ALTH
CITY HEALTH PFPT. IgSS BTH AVE TYPE-
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
c COUNTY-GLYNN
HALL CNTY HLTH DEPT., ENOTA DRIVF
GEORGI" DFKARTMENT OF PUHLlC HF.ALTH
WASHINGTON AND GRA"Y STREETS
GEORGIA DEfApT«ENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
W T GRANT CO, «1B THIRD STREET
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
POP CL-8 >t
RC COUNTY-WSCQGEE
POP CL-5 25
TYPE- RS COUNTY-HALL
POP CL-8 20
TYPE- R COUNTY-TOO^S
TYPE- C COUNTY-BI3B
POP CL-9 EDART«ENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
TYPE-
C COUNTY-CHATHAM
POP CL-5 55
VALDOSTA
SITE 01
HAWAII
HONOLULU
SITF 01
KAHALUU
SITE 02
IDAHO
BCISE
SITE 01
10H EAST CENTRAL AVENUE
6£0KGIA r>£HARTM£NT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-LArfNDES
POP CL-T 30
STATE DEPT MLTH BLOQ, 12»0 PUNCH ROWL ST TYP£-
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
RC COUNTY-HONOLULU
POP CL-5 40
NO SITE AOORESS
STATF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYP£-<*> NO SITE *DORESS
WEST CST (*)
CENTRAL Fi9E STATION, SIXTH AND IDAHO STS TYPE-
CITY-COUNTV HEALTH DEPARTMENT
C COUNTY-ADA
POP CL-7 50
BLITE COUNTY
SITE 01
M 0 AREA, CR»TERS nF THE «OON NAiL WON TYPE-
NATIONAL PARK SERVlCt
N CRATERS OF MOON NAT PK
DESERT 6
ILLINOIS
BLUE ISLAND
SITE 01
CALUMET CITY
SITE 01
ElStNH0»FR H S 12700 SACRAMENTO AVE TYPE- IR COUNTY-COOK
COOK. COUNTY AIR POLLUTIO" CONTROL BUREAU
THO«"TON HIGH SCHOOL, 75!> PULASKI ROAD TYPE-
COOK COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
R COUNTY-COOK
POP CL-8
POP CL-7 , 26
170
-------
CHICAGO
SITE Cl
SITE 02
CITY OFFICF SLOG 3ZO NORTH Cua°K STREET TYPE-
CHICAGO nifART^KNT OF AIR POLLUTTCN CONTROL
C COUNTY-COOK
<.'.5 SOUTH PLYMOUTH COURT
CHICACO OEPT OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
TYPE- C COUNTY-COOK
CMCAGC HEIGHTS
SITE 01 9LOO" H S, DIXIE HIGHWAY AMD IOT" ST TYPE- IR COUNTY-COOK
COOK COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
CICERO
SITE 01 ROOSEVELT SCHOOL. 15TH ST AND >QTH AVE TYPE- IR COUNTY-OOK
COOK CHUNTV AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
CCOK COUNTY
SITE 01 AR(jQ HIGH SCHOOL, A3RD ST AND 7*TH AVE TYPE- IR COUNTY-COOK
COO*. COUNTY MR KOLLUTIO" CONTROL BUREAj
POP CL-1 100
POP CL-1 12
POP CL-? 32
POP CL-6 34
POP CL-9 32
ILLINOIS
EAST ST LOU IS
SITE ni FI«ST FEOFOAL SLOG *35 MISSOURI AVE
SIOF HEALTH DISTPICT
TYPE- c COUNTY-ST
FLOSSWOR
SITE 01
HIOH SCHOOL, 999 KEDZIF AVE * ISITH ST TYPE-
COOK COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
PARK
SITE 01
HARVEY
SITE 01
F LLYC6* ;i S, 3*00 NORTH HOSE + AOOISON TYPE-
COOK. COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTRQI BUREAU
LOWELL EL*1' SCH. 157TH ST AND Lt'INGTON TYPE-
COOK CCUNJV 4IR POLLUTTO" CONTROL BUREAU
R COUNTY-COOK
IR COUNTY-COOK
R COUNTY-COOK
POP CL-6 65
POP CL-9 30
POP CL-8 2B
POP CL-7 23
HILLSIOfc
SITE 01
PROVISO w HIGH SCH, *OLF ••if HARBISON TYPE-
COOK CCUPITY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
IR COUNTY-CDOK
POP CL-9 30
JCLIET
SITE 01
56 VAN SURE" ST, "IALTO THEATRE HLD6
WILL CCUMTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
TYPE- C COUNTY-KILL
POP CL-6 100
MIDLOTHIAN
SITE 01 BRE»1E,\ TWi,SHP H Si 152O5 CR»iMFfiRn TYPE-
COOK C^^WTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BUREAU
IR COUNTY-COOK
POP CL-S 26
NILES
SITE 01
E "AIM: JR HJ&H, 895!> GRtFN«
-------
HAM«CNO
SITE 01 ROLU^L«TT *ROS DEPT ST^RE. 520ft UQH^AN Av TYPE- RC COuNTY-LAEP«PT"EMT OF PUBLIC HEALTH POP CL-5 35
KElUUCKY
ASrtLANv
SITE 01 KEWTUCKY PO^EK C0« 3«C - 15TH STREET TYPE- C COUNTY-MYO
ASHLAND - «ovo COUNTY HfcALTH OSPARTMENT POP CL-T 52
CCVI%"5TQN
SITF. 01 US POST Ope ICE-SOUTHWEST 7TH + SCCTT TYP£- IRC COUNTY-KE^TON
HEALTH nEPWRT^'E'iT POP CL-6 42
LF XI, \G
SITF Tl COLL Cf P«HARNACY, COR Of WASH A"D GLAO TYPE- RC COUNTY-FAYETTE
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY POP CL-6 *i
LCuISVTLLE
SITE 01 CITY PCLICt HO 63i M JEFFtRSON ST TY"E- C COUNTY-JEFFERSON
JEFFEHSD'I COUNTY AIR PnLlUTION C"i!A
N£A CPl EAMS
SITE OZ CIVIL COURTS dLDG POOF *Z7 LOYHL« AVE TYPE- C COUNTY-ORLEANS
LO'iJSlA'iA STATE HOARD ?C HFALTH POP CL-4 72
17E
-------
MAINE
ACAOJA NATIONAL PARK
SITE 01 SEAWALL AfJfcA OF PARK
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
MARYLANn
BALTIMORE
SITE 01 FJRi OFPT "3 •ILDG, <.!'• £ LEX[Nf-,T~.N ST
Cliy HF.ALTH OtPARTMENI
CULVERT COUNTY
SITE ri SOLOMC»IS ISLMO
"AWYLAV STATE DEPARTMENT OF HI-AI TH
TYPE- N ACADIA NATIONAL PARK
EAST CST 15
TYPE- C COU.NTY-TALT I'-'ORE CITY
POP CL-3 32
TY°E-
SOLO«O^S ISLAND
FARMLAND 10
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON
SITE Cl FO«L)
BROCKTON
SITE 02
SITE 01
LYNN
SITE 11
NE* "
SITE 01
CLINCY
SITE 01
15 WSH8USTOH. PL&CE
OF PJ«LIC hEALTH
PAIHF. SCHOOL, CHESFNT STREET
CITY CEPApT^ENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
TYPE- HC COUNTY-SJFFOLK
OF AIR USC MANAGEMENT POP CL-4 100
TY^E- RC COUI>ITY-PLY'V'OUTH
POP CL-6
LA^'KEMCE LXPfe«IMtNT ST»T 37 S^ATTUCK ST TYPE- R
MASSACnUSuTTS OEfAPT«E'"T IF PUBLIC
POP CL-6 55
CITY HALL, CITY HALL SQUARE
CIIY CF.PAKTV,FNIT OF PUBLIC HE«LTH
TYPE- RC COUNTY-ESSEX
POP CL-A 75
"U^JCIPAL HUIL^INQ U3 «ILLI«'"> 'TREET TYPE- C COUNTY-BRISTOL
OEPA5T'1EMT IF PUBLIC HEALTH POP CL-5 50
HF«LTH
CITY
«LD& H20 HANQC< ST
OF PUSLIC HE«LTH
TYP£- RC
POP CL-6 50
SITE 01
MICHIGA-
DETROIT
SITE 01
"U'UCIPAL HOSPITAL, 1«1« STATE STREET
CITr OF.P«5T11E'IT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC
CI'Y
52')l «looO'i(v«l' AV/EMOE
OF AIR POLLUTION C"''JTROL
TYPE- R COUNTY-HA^POEN
POP CL-5 60
TYPE- C COUNTY-WAYNE.
POP CL-2 90
^LI^1T
SITE 01
FI'E STATp'l ROOF OETPniT ST A'") 4TH AVE TYPE- C COUNTY-GENESFE
ciir OEpafii^FNT OF PUBLIC WORKS »NO UTILITIES POP CL-S so
GPANC
SITE 11
"iCnlGA-; TITLE COH»ANY 321' OTT<1|,« AVENUE TYOE-JRC
OF Alp POLLUTION
POP CL-5 25
OLLUTM
SITE 01
CITY HILL, FOURTH Avt, «E5T AND FIRST ST TYI'E- IRC COUNTY-ST LOUIS
CITY ^EPARTMFN.T OF PUBLIC HEALTH POP CL-5 63
MINNEAPOLIS
«ITE ci u OF (•• ST 43 OF HLTH BLDG 417 ITTH AVE SF TYPE- ic COUNTY-HENNEPIN
CITY Cf MIMNFApoLIS AJR onLLUTIO" CONTROL DIVISION POP CL-* 64
SITE 01
OLO POST OFFICE BLnG 521 VAIN «VfNU£
CIIY CF WCISMEAD
TYPE- C COUNTY-CL**
POP CL-S 28
S«ITEUOI
PUBLIC
BLDG, io» EAST IOTH ST TYPE- ic
BCARoI CITY OEPAoTMENT OF PU«LIC UTILITIES
POP CL-5
MISSI5SIDPI
0Ol
01
SPRINGS GULF COAST L*S, "4>/IS BAY TYPE- N OAviS
«A?} RESEARCM LA* nsUTl'TTCNS OF HIGrtFR LEARNING
GULF CST 0
MISSOURI
POLICE a»K*6E 1325 OAK STREET
CMY CEPA,,tMF.NT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
TYPE- 1C COUNTY-JACKSON
POP CL-* 12
173
-------
ST LOUIS
SITE 01
SITt OZ
P 0 OUILOTNG, 18TH AND MARKET STREETS TYI'E- C COUNTY-ST LOUIS CITY M
DIVISION ATR POLLUTION CONTROLt CITY OEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POP CL-3 58
Z15 SCUT* IZTrl BOULEVARD
UNITED STATES PUBLtC HEALTH SEPyiCE
TYPE- 1C COUNTY-ST LOUIS
POP CL-3 9
CCUNTY
SITE "1 EMINENCE FlRt CONTROL IOWER, ST WHY 19 TYPE- N EMINENCE FIRE CONTROL TW
STATE CoNsERyMION CO»MTSSIOS AND ST HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOREST 100
MONTANA
GLACIER NATIONAL PARK
SITE 01 ST MARY RANGER STATION (BARB)
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
TYPE-
N GLAC NATL PK BOX H
MOUNTAIN
HELENA
SITE 01
NEBRASKA
Of AHA
SITE 01
STATE LAR "LOS, LOCKEY AV AND « ROB ST5 TYPE- RC COUMTY-LE*IS + CLARK
ST»TE BOAtm OF HEALTH POP CL-8 Z5
CITY HALL, 18TH AND FAPNA* STREETS TYPE- ic COUNTY-DOJGLAS
SMOKE ABATEMENT DIVISION, CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POP CL-S no
THOMAS COUNTY
SITE 01 BESSEY NURSERY, NEBRASKA NATIONAL FOREST TYPE-
UNITED STATES FOKEST SFRVlCt
NEBRASKA NATIONAL FOREST
FARMLAND 5
NEVAOA
LAS VEGAS
SITE 01 FIRE ALARM SLOG, SECOND AND STFWAST STS TYPE- 1C COUNTY-CLARK
CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT HtALTH DEPARTMENT POP CL-6
SITE 01
COUNTY-CITY HLTH OEPT, 10 KlRMAN STREET TYPE- RC COUNTY-wASHOF.
CITY-COUNTY DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
VIHITE PIKE COUNTY
SITE 01 LEHMAN CAVF.S NATIONAL MONUMENT
NAIJON«L PARK SERVlCt
NE* HAMPSHIRE
CCNCCRO
SITE 11 ftl SOUTH S°RI'NG STREET
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH » »IELFARE
ccos COUNTY
SITE 01 US FISH CUL SfA, WHITE MTN NAT FOR
UNITED STATES FISH And WILDLIFE
TYPE-
POP CL-6 20
LEHMAN CAVES NATL MQN
DESERT 3
TYPE- RC COUNTY-MERRIMACK
POP CL-7 30
TYPE- N WHITE MOUNTAIN NAT FOR
FOREST 0
NEfc JF.RSEY
BAYONNE
SITE 01
BAYONNE HOSPITAL RD, z?^ STREFT
BAYONN6 Og"ARTMENT OF H£ALTH
TYPE- 1R COUNTY-HUDSON
BURLINGTON COUNTY
SITE 02 J KAME NUPSEPY 2102 "ApUTON PIKE
CHERRY HILL BOARD OF HEALTH
CAMDEN
SITE 01
ELIZABETH
SITE 01
GLASSBORC
SITE 01
HAMILTON
SITE 01
FIRE HO "LOG, THIRl AMD ARCH STS
POP CL-6 50
TYPE- KC COUNTY-9URLIN6TON
POP CL-9 12
TYPE- IRC COUNTY-CAWEN
BUREAU OF FIRE, DEPARTMENT OF »u*i-ic SAFETY POP CL-S so
THOMAS JEFFEPS9N HIGH SCH, 2T F SCOTT ST TYPE- R COUNTY-UNION
CITY BOARJ OF HEALTH
POP CL-5 63
BOSS HART HALL GLA55BCBO STATE COLLEGE TYPE- RC COUNTY-GLOUCESTER
STATE OF NEvJ JERSEY POP CL-B
MUNICIPAL °LDG 2090 GRFEN^OOO AyFNUE
HAMILTON TO»IM5HIP HEALTH DEPARTMENT
TYPE- i COUNTY-M.ERCER
POP CL-6 50
JERSEY CITY ;
SITE 01 VEOICAL CENTER G«RAQE BLOQ, COHNFILSON AV TYPE- IR COUNTY-HUDSON
CITY SCARQ OF HEALTH POP CL-5 85,
NEWARK
SITE 01
"20 BROAD STREET* CITY HALL
CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WEI.FARE
TYPE- 1C COUNTY-ESSEX
POP CL-* 65
174
-------
SITE ni
P£i0 HIGH STRFET
RU»EAU OF AIR POLLUTIO1" CONTROL
BOAKD CF HEALTH ROOF-MILL AND PASSAIC STS TY"E-
b>JARO OF HEALTH
TYPE-
IC COUNTY-PASSAIC
POP CL-5 32
R COUNTY-1'131>LE SEX
POP CL-7 15
TEENTO'J
SITE 11
STATS HOUSP ANNEX, WEST STATE ST
BUREAU OF ADULT * OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
TYPE- IKC COUNTY-MEKCER
NEU MEXICO
ALBUCUERQUE
SITE 01 ion PLCCK AT Tutsas AVE NE TYPE-
ALBUCUEROUF HEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
RIO AR°IBA COUN1Y
5ITE 01 wFST OF WATER FILTER PLANT
Bin ARRJBA COUNTY
TYPE-
POP CL-5 60
IRC COUNTr-WIALILLO
POP CL-S 42
WATER FILTER PLANT
MOUNTAIN 7
AKRO'!
SITE 01
ALBANY
SITE 01
BABYLON
SITE 01
BINGHA-TON
SITE CZ
SITE 03
SITE 01
SITE 03
SITE 01
AKHUN SEWA&E TREATMENT PLANT
5T«TE OF NFrf YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
STATF OEPT OF HLTH BLDG, 84 HILLING AVE
STATE OF nFW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
EAST FARMiNGOALE DATES' PLANT 6AZ?A 8LVD
STATF OF "F«i YORK, DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH
COUNTY HEALTH yuiLOINft
STATF OF \E*' YORK 0£PAPTMENT OF WEALTH
MORTH HIG-I
5TATE OF NFW YORKiOEP&PTMENT OF HEALTH
"USEUr OF NATURAL SCIENCE, HuMKQLT PKrtY
ERIc COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
p S 26 84 HARRISON STPEET
STATE OF »'Fd YORK, DEPARTMENT Oh HEALTH
TON,< MALL
STATF OF I'lEil YORK, DEPARTMENT 01- HEALTH
ChEMUNfi COUNTY
SITE 02 SI'jFLATS MO SITE AripRESS
STATE OF NCW YORK.nEPiPTMENT OF HEALTH
CCLUNBt* COUNTY
SITE 01 WATER TREATMENT t-LANT
STATE QF VFW YORK. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SITE 01
ENDICOTT
SITE 01
ENOICOTT
SITE 02
ERIE COUNTY
SITE 11
GARDEN CITY
JITE 01
GLEN Cf!VE
SITE 01
"AINTENAWCF BUILOIMG, K0« CANAL «TREET
CITY tfAl"rFNANCt DFPAKTMEMT
CHAKLES F JOHNSON JUNIOR HI&H SC"COL
STAIF OF Nc* YORK,OEP*PTUFNT OF HEALTH
fiEORGE « jnHNSoN ELEMENTARY SC"OOL
STATE OF MF* YORK,DEP6RT"ENT 01- HEALTH
HOLLAND WATER WORKS
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION SUILDIMfi
ST«TE OF NEW YORK .DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
POUffc QARAGF, 146 GLE« STREET
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYDE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
TYPE-
5 COUNTY -E9 It
POP
R COUNTY-ALdANY
POP
IS COUNTY-SUFFOLK
POP
C COUNTY-BROOKE
POP
RC COUNTY-5R30ME
POP
«C COUNTY-ERIE
POP
I COUNTY-ERIE
POP
R COUNTY-EP1E
POP
is COUNTY-CHEUNG
POP
S COUNTY-COLUMBIA
POP
IR COUNTY-CHEMUNG
POP
R COUNTY-9P30ME
POP
IR COUNT Y-SROOME
POP
N COUNTY-ERIE
POP
RC COUNTY-NASSAU
POP
IRC COUNTY-NASSAU
nnn
CL-9
CL-5
CL-8
CL-6
CL-6
CL-4
CL-4
CL-6
CL-9
CL-9
CL-7
CL-8
CL-B
CL-9
CL-B
r* _a
0
40
25
30
50
50
20
60
10
35
16
15
45
0
90
1 Q
CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
175
-------
SITF in
OCF.ANSIDE SEW PUMP STAT TYPE- IR COUNTY^ASSAU
STME CF 'Ifn YORK.DEPtRnEMT OF HEALTH POP CL-7 3
HCH5EHPAC5
SITE 01 MO»SpHFAD sENIlR HIGH SCHOOU TYPE- RC COUNTY-CHEMgNG
STATE CF -1FW YORK. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-9 50
SITE
JFFFE9SCN
SITE "1
TREATMENT -PLANT TYPE- IR COUNTY-COLUMBIA
E CF ,<,!•« YORK, DEPARTMENT if HEALTH POP CL-8 0
FOG SIG'IAL BLDG TI&8ETTS PT LIGHT STA
UNITED STATES Co-AST GU»Rr>
JCriNSO'-l CITY
SITE 01
N CITY SR H s «AIN STREET
STHF. OF jFrf YORK,r>EPART*E"T OF HEALTH
KINGS POINT
SITE 01 SA'VELS HALL MARINE AC«DEMY
STA1E CF ME* YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
KINGSTON
SITE 01
ULSTER COUNTY OFFICE 3uILDIN5
STATE OF ':F/H YORK. DEP»RTMEf4T OF HEALTH
TYPE- N CAPE
GT.L»KES 18
TYPE- R COUNTY-3ROOME
POP CL-8
TYPE- S COUNTY-NASSAU
POP CL-9 50
TYPE- RC COUNTY-ULSTER
POP CL-7 90
SITE 01
SITE 02
MASSENA
SITE 01
T»EAT«ENT PLANT TYPE- IR COUNTY-ERIE
STATF nF ,\F« YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-7 0
OU» LADY OF VICTORY CONVENT TYPE- C COUNTY-ERIE
ST»TE OF HErt YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-7 80
CITY SEwAgF. TREATMFrn PMNT, E OPVIS ST TYPE- IRC COUNTY-ST LAWRENCE
STA1F OF NFU YORK, DEPARTMENT nF HEALTH POP CL-8 13
MT VER:'QN
SITE 01
CITY riiLL "LfG TYPE- c COUNTY-WESTCHESTER
OF -IF* YORK, DEpART«FNT OF HEALTH POP CL-6 *0
NASSAU COUNTY
SITE 02 OYSTER BAY NO SjTE
5T*TF OF viE
SITE 03
TYPE-!*) COUNTY-NASSAU
OF HEALTH POP CL-9 <»)
co. SAMT«RIUM PLAI^VIEW, OYSTIR PAY TYPE- is COUNTY-NASSAU
STATF CF MFX YORK,DEPARTMENT OF "EALTH POP CL-9 30
SITE 0* OYSTER UAy WATER Dl&T»TCT TYPE- S COUNTY-NASSAU
ST»TF. CF v?ri YORK,DEPtoTMEMT OF HEALTH POP CL-9 3
NF» PAI.TZ
SITE 01 VTI.L«Ofc GAPAGE TYPE- S COUNTY-ULSTER
STATF OF "e*i YORK, DEPARTMENT OK HEALTH POP CL-9 is
NF.« ROrHEl.L =
SITF 02 Ht*LTH DFPARTV.ENT TYPE- RCS COUNTY-'IESTCHESTER
ST«TF; OF i*« IORK, DEPARTMENT oe HEALTH POP CL-6 *o
NF« YO'K CITY
SITE Cl HARLEV Cr>'J°T HOUSE, 170 F.AST 1Z1 STREET TYPE- RC COUNTY-9RONX
lE^ART^tNI OF »I« POLLUTION CO^T^CL POP CL-1 075
SITE 12
SITE 13
SITE lY PLACE TYPE- C COUNTY-NE^ YORK
CITY CF Nt* VORIC DEPARTMENT OF Aj« POLLUTION CONTROL POP CL-1 350
-------
SITF 2(4 FH«S ie:4c, CO 258) 10-40 47 AVE L'- ISL CTY TYPE- IHC COUNTY-'WEENS
CITY CF HF« YORK DEPARTMENT OF AtR POLLUTION CONTROL POP CL-1 55
CITE 27 a«"OKLYN POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE 313 JAY $T TYPE- IHC COUHTY-KtIGS
CITY OF MEi YORK DFPAKTME'iT OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL POP CL-1 35
SITE 28 WILLOftBROoK HQSpITAL STAToN ISL»"D TYPE- S COUNTY-RICHMOND
CITf Cf NEn YORK OEPARTMF.NT OF AtR POLLUTION CONTROL POP CL-1 20
ossinr'G
SITE 01 HIGHLANDS AI/F.NUE HIGH SCHOOL TYPE- c COUNTY-^ESTCHESTER
5T«TE OF "Ert YORK, DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH POP CL-8 45
PCUGHKEEPS1E
SITE 01 POU(jHKFEPS!E ftATER WORKS TY"E- R COUNTY-OUTQHESS
ST»TF OK 'I** YORK, DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH POP CL-7 30
ROCHESTER
SITE 01 R
HO BjtLUING* IBS NORTH 5T»EFT
COi/ITY HEALTH "'F^RTMENT
RCCKVILLE CTR
SITE 01 NO SITF AuURFSS
F. OF nf. COUNTY-SUFFOLK
STATE CF MF* YORK, OEP^RT^FNT OF HEALTH POP CL-9 (*>
nisTRiCT CUURT BUILOI ,e TYPE- c COUNTY-SUFFOLK
STATE CF *'Frt YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-9 50
uOM£ Ct- SEYMOUR rtECKER ™BE- « COUNTY-SUFFOLK
STATF OF Jc« YORK, OtpARTMFNT OF HEALTH POP CL-9 0
WATEP 0£PT MAJNT BL06 101 M HFHCu STREET TYPE- C
STATE CF M*« YORK, OepnRT^iFNT OF HEALTH
POP CL-5 15
TO«AISA'!DA
SITE 01
INSELAER
, DEPART«E.n •» HEALTH POP Ct-6 80
U"l?E 01 CITY HEALTH oFC,CE B,.0r,, -06 t..I7ARETH ST TYPE- C COU.STY-ONE1DA
CITY HEALTH UfcPARTMENT POP C>--5 15
177
-------
hWITE PLAINS
SITE CI COUNTY BUILDING 148 "APTINE AVFNUE TYPE- C COUNTY-^ESTCHESTER
STATE OF HEW YORK, DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH POP CL-6 150
SITE 02
WATER TRFATMFNT PL«NT TYPE- R COUNTY-w'ESTCHESTER
STATE OF NFW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-5 20
NCPTH CAROLINA
AJHEVILLE
SITE 01 GROVE ARCANE 3LDG, BATTERY PAR< AVENUE
BUNCOMBE COUNTY HEALIH DEPARTMENT
CHARLOTTE
SITE 01
FI»E OEPT "Lf>6. 12« SOUTH
rnr HEALTH
ST
TYPE- C COUNTY-BUMCOMBE
POP CL-6 45
TYPE- C COUNTY-BRJNSWICK
POP CL-5 40
CAPE HATTERA5 NAT SEA
SITE 01 BODIE ISLAND CAPE HATTERAS RFC AREA
NATIONAL PARK SEPVICI
NORTH DAKOTA
BISMARCK
SITE 01 V,E;IO°IAL BUIL£>IN&« 213 SIXTH STREET
TYPE-
N CAPE HATTERAS
EAST C5T
TYPE- C COUNTY-3URLEIGH
FAKGC
SITE 01
CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SuTLDIMS INSPECTION POP CL-T 30
TYPE- C COUNTY-CftSS
CIVIC CENTER ROOF 201 M0« *TH
CITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
POP CL-7 2*
COUNTY
SITE 01 VAINT BLOs UPt SOURIS, LAKE DA9LTNQ TYPE- N LAKE DARLIN5
UNITED STATES FISH AND nILDLIFF SERVICE FARMLAND 12
OHIO
ADAMS COUNTY
SITE 01 AD»M5 COU'-iTY HOSPITAL WEST UNION OHIO
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- S COUNTY-ADAMS
POP CL-9 25
AKriON
SITE 01
FIRE STATION NO. 4, 8X1 COBURN STREET
CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- IRC COUNTY-SU^IT
POP CL-5 30
CANTON
SITE 01
SITE 02
SITE 03
CLEVELIND
SITE 01
CCLUMBIJS
SITE 01
DAYTON
SITE 01
CITY H«LL
OHIO DfcpT. OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-STARK
POP CL-5 23
CINCINNATI
SITE 01 PUBLIC LlSRARY BUILDING. 800 V1NF STREET TYPE- C COUNTY-HAMILTON
BU« OF AIR POLL CONTROL AND HE«TTNG INSP CITY OEPT OF SAFETY POP CL-4 80
COLLEGE HILL 1654 BARLOW: AVENUE TYPE- R COUNTY-HAMILTON
CI'Y CF CINCINNATI DIVISION OF ATR POLLUTION CONTROL POP CL-4 30
CfcMTRAL AVENUE AND ANN STREET TY°E- C COUNTY-HAMILTON
CITY OF CINCINNATI Oltf OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL POP CL-4 25
CLfeVEL«UD HEALTH M'lSEU". 8911 KUCLIO AVE TYPE- C COUNTY-CUYAHOGA
CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE POP CL-3 50
HLTH « SAFETY CENTER, isi s WASH HLVO TYPE- ic COUNTY-FRANKLIN
CIYT DIV OF SMOKE RE&uLATION AND INSP DEPT OF PUBLIC 5AFETV POP CL-4 62
"U-UCIPAL HUIL9ING. 101 «. THIRD STREET TYPE- I COUNTY-MONTGOMERY
CITY BUR OF COMBUSTION CONTROL, CITY DIV OF BLDG INSPECTION POP CL-5 88
EAST LIVERPOOL
SITE 01 MUNICIPAL »Lr>6 126 W 6TH ST E I IvERPOOL 0 TYPE- C COUNTY-COLUMBlANA
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-8 15
FRANKLIN
SITE 01
GPEENVILLE
SITE 01
FOURTH AND MAIN STREETS FRANKLIN OHIO
OHIO UFPARTMpMT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-WARREN
POP CL-9
PRQ» ASSOC 200 E 3Ro ST G^EPNVILLE o TYPE- c COUNTY-OARKE
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-8 30
HAMILTON
SITE 01
2 HIGH STREET HAMILTON OHIO
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-SUTLER
POP CL-6 110
178
-------
LCRAIN
SITE 01
*'Ait.R WOPKS OFFICE BUDS' llos FloST 5T
cnr CEPAKTipNT op PUPLIC SERVICF
TYPE- 1C COUNT Y-
POP cu-6
WAKYSVTLLE
?ITE 01 SOUTH "AIM AMU SIXTH STSF.HTS "«RySvILLE 0 TYPE- C COUNTY-1.)")! ON
OHIO Df-f^TMcNT OF HEALTH POP CL- N PERRY ST NAPOLEON nmo
l/EPASTMFMT OF HEALTM
TYPE- c COUNTY-HENRY
POP CL-9 3*
MTE 01
CENTRAL F]D£ STATION 75 5 4TH ST NEWARK 0 TYPE- C COUNTY-LICKIMQ
OHIO DEPAriTME'n OF HEALTH POP CL-7 20
PA1NESVILLE
SITE 01 7 «1CH"ONO STREET
OHIO uEPAPTlENT OF HEALTH
PCRT5"ICU1H
SITE 01 1001 NINTH STREET
OHIO UF.PARTMFNT OF MEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-LAKE
POP CL-8 18
TYPE- C COUNTY-5CIOTO
POP CL-7 30
STEUBEXVII.LE
SITE 01 CITY ANNFX BUILDING. 308 MARKET 5TPEET TYPE- C COUNTY-JEFFERSON
CITY OF STtUSENVILLE AIR ^nLLUTIlN BUREAU POP CL-7 30
TOLEDO
SITE 01 VATEP OEPAPT«ENT GARAfjF, 5»>5 N tpiE ST TYPE- 1C COUNTY-LUCAS
"IV CF AIR ANO WATER PILL CONT9QL. CITY DEPT OF PUBLIC SERVICE POP CL-5 2*
UPPER
SITE fl
VAN Wgi)T
SITE 01
WYANOQT CnjNIY COU&T HngsF.
OHIO UEP'RTMFNT OF HEALTH
tot WEST CPAfFORO STKEEI V*N wtRT OHIO
OHIO DKPA«TIF;U OF HEALTH
TYDE- C COUNTY-»IYANDOT
POP CL-9 50
TYPE- c COUNTY-VAI *ERT
POP CL-S 11
klARREN
SITE Cl
1&C HIGH STRFET UAPRE'! OHIO
OHIO OF.PAsTlENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-TPJM3ULL
POP CL-6 65
hASHINSTCN COUt^T HOUSE
SITE 01 JESS-GILM'^E
OHIO UEPARTMFNT OF HtALTH
C H CHID
TYt>E- C COUNTY-FAYETTE
POP CL-8 21
hCCSTEV
SITE ni
534 NCPT" ^AP/E AND O»K ST TYPE- IRC COUNTY-UA.NE
STATE SANITAPY AuT"ORITY, STATF RQARO OF HEALTH POP CL-6 50
JACK.SCN CQ CT HOUSE AUX 10 S QAICDALE ST TYPE- RC COUNTY-JACKSON
STATE SANITARY AUTHORITY. STATF BOARD OF HEALTH POP CL-B *0
179
-------
PCRTLA-ID
SITE 01
STaTE OFFICE dUILDTHb, 14UO Sw 5TH AVENUE TYPE- C CCUNTY-MULTNOMAH
5T«TF SAMITARY AUTHORITY, STATE "CARD OF HEALTH POP CL-5 125
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLENTCViN
SITE 01 CITY HALL ANNEX, 6^5 LIN"EN STREeT
CITY
AlTOCNI
SITE 01
TYRE- C COUNTY-LEHISH
POP CL-5 24
CITY HALL, 12T-H ST°EET ?*ir> 13TU AvENuE TYDE- RC COUNTY-BLAIR
CITY DEPARTMENT OF WATFR, PARKS, ANO PUBLIC PROPERTY POP CL-6 62
BF.THLEWEM
SITE 01
CITY HALL, 53 EAST BROAD STREET
CITY fiUKEaU OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-NORTHUMBERLAND
POP CL-6 45
CLARIO"' COUNTY
SITE 01 COOH. FOREST STATE PARK, TYP£-
ST*TF DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS AND WATERS
ERIE
SITfc 01
COOK FOREST STATE PARK
MOUNTAIN
UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE dL°G« 617-27 STA TYPE- I«C COUNTY-ERIE
CITY BUREAU OF ENGINEERS LICENSE* AMD SMOKE ABATEMENT POP CL-5 50
JCHNSTCWN
SITE 01
PUBLIC SAFETY SL06. MARKET ANO WASH STS TYPE- 1C COUNTY-CAMBRIA
CITY FIRE nEPARTviE"IT POP CL-6 80
LANCASTER
SITE 01
BLOG. «i* COLUMBIA AVESUE TYPE- ic COUNTY-LANCASTER
STATE DEPART"cNT OF HEALTH POP CL-6 35
PHILADELPHIA
SITE 01 A P C LABOOATORY 320U FRA-IKFORH »VE TYPE- I COUNTY-PMILADELPHIA
DIV OF A1K POLL CONTROL ANO Hit" SANITATION CITY DEPT OF PUB HLTH POP CL-2 27
SITE 02
PITTSBURGH
SITE 01
READING
SITE 01
2031 R»CE STREET TYPE- R COUNTY-PHILADELPHIA
DIV OF AIR POLL CONT AND ENV SANITATION, CITY D6PT OF PUB HLTH POP CL-2 15
cou.tTY oFpict BLDG FORBES AVE «T ROSS ST TYPE- c COUNTY-ALLEGHENY
OF AIR POLL CONTROL ALLEGMtNY COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH POP CL-4 160
CITY HALL, 8T"I AND WASMI"l(jTON STS.
CITY BUREAU OF HEALTH
TYPE- IRC COUNTY-BERKS
POP CL-6 40
SC»Al.'T~N
SITE 01
FIRE STATION, *ASH AND MULBERRV «T
ST^TE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- c COUNTY-LACKAWANNA
POP CL-5 15
WARMINSTER
SITF 01 TRE*TMEMT CONTROL BLOG, UflG CAHIM ORIVE TYPE- R COUNTY-BUCKS
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HtALTri POP CL-9 14
i»EST CHESTER
SITE 01 PL COUNTY-CATANO
CO'lMOI,i"EALTH OF PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH POP CL-4 (»)
GUAYANTLLA
SITE 01 PUHLIC SCHOOL LUNCH ROOM BO MACAHA
PUtftTC RICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE-
POP CL-9 9
UCQUILLO »TS
SITE 01 "T bRITTOiM
PUKRTO RICO OEPART«ENT OF HEALTH
N «T 8RITTON
FOREST 10
180
-------
PCNCE
SITE 01
LOPEZ MEM0°IAL, CEMENTfcRlO ST. Nn 20
PONCE DIST°ICT HOSPITAL
TYPE-
POP CL-S 19
RHCDE ISLAMD
EAST PROVIDENCE
SITE 01 CtMTOAL JP HTGH SCHOOL, TEUTON »vE
PROVIDENCc HEALTH DEPARTMENT
TYPE- RC COUNTY-BPDVlOENCF.
POP CL-7 4"
PpOVIOftNCE
SITE 01 POLICfc HO "LOS, FOHNt ST AT LABILE S3 TYPE- ISC COUNTY-PP3VIDENCE
CITY utPAsTMFNT OF BUILDING INACTION POP CL-
SITE ,n
POP CL-S 45
COUNTY
PINE HILL «MOE TO«EK, EXSTER TYPE- N pint HILL PIPE TO*ER
OEPAQTMENT OF AUPICuLluRf «NO CONSERVATION FARMLAND 19
SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA
SITE 01 UNIVERSAL HLOsi l?*5-t7 SnMTEH
CITY PUBLIC WORKS nto^BTMtNT
TYPE- C COUNTY-RICHLANO
POP CL-6 27
OCEENVILLE
SITE i 5 OEPT OF AQwKuLTUSE FARMLAND 4*0
RCCK HILL
SITE 02
FI"E STATION 2U tLUARtTH LafOF TYPE- C COUNTY-YOSK
SOUTH CAROLI'IA POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY POP CL-7 24
SOLTH DAKOTA
SLACK HILLS NAT FOREST
SITE 01 TEPEE WORK CENTER
U S FCREST SERVICE
SIOUX FALLS
SITE 01 CITY HALL, 22<» WEST 9TH
CITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
TYPE- N TEPEE WORK CENTER
FOREST
TYPE- RC COUNTY-
POP CL-6 44
TENNESSEE
CH*TTA-OOGA
SITE 01
KNCXVILLE
SITE 01
US POST T-FlCt 9TH ST ANO GEORGIA AyE TYPE- C COUNTY-HAMILTON
HU»£AC' If M° ^OLLMTI-T' CONTROL »NH BOILER INSPECTION POP CL-5 85
«ASof!ic TEWPLE» ><)•> LOCUST STRRET TYPE- IRC COUNTY-KIOX
Dlv OF SMuKE KEli AMD bOILER IN5PFCTION CITY DEPT OF BUB SAFETY POP CL-5 70
MEMPHIS
SITE 01
HEALTH DFPT BLOGI "i* JEFFERSON ST TYPE- IRC COUNTY-SHELSY
ME''PH1S-SHFLBY COUNTY HEALTH UFPAUTMENT POP CL-4 26
NASHVILLE
siTt 01
CITY-CCJNTY BUILDING, °u«nc Sf3u«(": TYPE- IRC COUNTY-OAVIDSON
BO»EAU OF tNSPtCTlON 6"0 PFRMITS, CITY OEPT OF PUHLIC WORKS POP CL-5 90
TEXAS
*SITEN02
«2" EAST 51RO STREET
TEXAS STATE »tP»RT«ENT 0* HEALTH
TYPE- RC COUNTY-TRAVIS
POP CL-5 20
8SITEW01
CITE 02
ROStLAND PARK
TEXAS STATF UEDART^EMT OF WEALTH
PA«K STRFE1
TOWER
TEX«5 -iTATF OEoARriENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- S COUNTY-HARRIS
°°P C"--T 12
TYPE- C COUNTY-HARRIS
POP CL-' 00
.
CITE 02
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
n BELVI^ FIRE STA MT BELV1EW TFXAS
TEXAS STATF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TyPE.
REACH ctTy
SULF C5T
TYPE- 1C «-T 8ELVTE* FIRE STATION
GULF «T 5
01
OF HEALTH
- R COUNTY-BRA2QRIA
POPCL-9 18
181
-------
CORPUS CHRIST I
SITE 01 30*1 MORGAN STREET
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SITE nz
B800 UPPFR RIVER R"AD
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- RC COUNTY-NUECES
POP CL-5 20
TYPE- N COUNTY-'IUECES
POP CL-5 20
DALLAS
SITE 01
EL PASO
SITE 01
FT WORTH
SITE 01
6ALVESTON
SITE 01
CITY HALL, 2015 COMMERCE STREET
CIIY HEALTH DEPARTMENT '
ii» WEST MISSOURI
TEXAS STATF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
1000 THROCKMORTON
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
CITY HALL
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-DALLAS
POP CL-* 55
TYPE- IN COUNTY-EL PASO
POP CL-5 65
TYPE- RC COUNTY-TARRANT
POP CL-5 50
TYPE- RC COUNTY-GALVESTON
POP CL-6 70
HOUSTON
SITE 01
LAREDO
SITE 01
SAM HOUSTON COLISEUM. 810 8AQBY STREET
CITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
2420 SAN aER»NRDO
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-HARRIS
TYPE- C COUNTY-WE3B
POP CL-3 50
POP CL-6 *
LLBBOC*
SITE 01
MCALLEJ
SITE 01
SIXTH HMD <
TEXAS STATF. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
1920 BEECH AyENUF.
TEXAS STATF: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
MATAG03DA COUNTY
SITE 01 COLORADO RIVtR LOC*5
MATAGCRDA COUNTY HEALTH 9EP*RTME»T
ODESSA
SITE 01
SEVENTH AW N QIXIE STREfcTS
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- RC COUNTY-LUBBQCK
POP CL-5 16
TYPE- IR COUNTY-HIDALGO
POP CL-7 30
TYPE- N COLORADO RIVER LOCKS
GULF CST *
TYPE- IRC COUNTY-ECTOR
POP CL-6 12
ORANGE
SITE "
PASADENA
SITE 01
SEVENTH STREET AT FLM
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
ROOF OF CITY H»LL« 1Z11 E. SOUTHMCRE
HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF PASADENA
PORT APTHUR
SITE 01 MEMORIAL BOULEVARD AND 3ZNO STREFT
TEXAS 5T«TC "FoARTMENT OF HEALTH
SAN ANTONTO
SITE 01
TEXARKANA
SITE 01
TYPE- RC COUNTY-ORANGE
POP CL-7 25
TYPE- C COUNTY-HARRIS
TYPE-
POP CL-6 15
R COUNTY-JEFFERSON
POP CL-6 20
CORP' >T!"" CVIRI« 30Z j LAREDO
SAN «NTONIO MtTROPOLITAN HEALTH DISTRICT
TYPE- c COUNTY-BEXAR
POP CL-4 15
NEW BOSTON
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TEXAS CITY
SITE 01 CITY HALL
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- 1C COUNTY-BOdlE
POP CL-7 2
TYPE- IRC COUNTY-GALVESTON
POP CL-7 23
TYLER
SITE 01
CITY HALL
TEXAS STATF OEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-SMITH
POP CL-6 24
fcACO
SITE 01
CITY HALL
TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WICHITA FALLS
SITE 01 60Z 9ROAD STREET
TEXAS STATF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-MC LENNAN
POP CL-6 60
TYPE- RC COUNTY-WICHITA
POP CL-6 15
-------
UTAH
OGDEN
SITE 01
2570 GRANT AVENUE
WE"LR COUNTY HEALTH
TYPE- RC COUNTY-/IE3ER
POP CL-6 15
SALT LAKE CITY
SITE 01 WEALTH OEPT BLOG» 610 SOUTH 2NO EAST
STAft OcP*»TMeNT 0
TYPE- IRC COUNTY-SALT LAE-
WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH D
C COUNTY-KINO
C COUNTY-KINQ
TYPE- I COUNTY-KING
POP CL-* 80
POP CL-« 2Z9
POP CL-*
183
-------
SITE 05
SITE 06
SITE 07
SITE 08
SITE 09
32z<.-4TH AV/EMUE SOUTH TYPE- i COUNTY-KING
BU&ET souNti Bi» POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY pnp CL-* i*
596U Rnf'I^R AVENUE» SOUTH TYPE- R COUNTY-KI1G
"U'j£T 50UN1 «IR POLLUTION CONTHOL AGENCY POP CL-* 12
WEbT CCM"0"ORE WAY TYPE- 1C COUNTY-KING
PUGET sou"") »IR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY POP CL-* 12
I6ioi GREEN'"'aoi AVFNUE, ^ORTH TYPE- R COUNTY-KING
PUGET SOU'"' "I"? POLLUTIO"' CONTROL AGENCY POP CL-4 10
SEATTLE CE"'TFR SOS HARKISON STREET TYt>E- RC COUNTY-KING
PUwO L*Ke AVE
WISCONSIN "-TATF BOARD ot HEALTH
TYPE- C COUNTY-RACINE
POP CL-6 25
OOU&LAS CO COURT H"USEt 1313 R£L
------- | |