v>EPA
         United States
         Environmental Protection
         Agency
          Industrial Environmental Research
          Laboratory
          Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA-600/7-79-232C
December 1979
Assessment of Diesel
Particulate Control:
Particle Size Measurements
          Interagency
          Energy/Environment
          R&D Program Report

-------
                 RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES


Research reports of the Office of Research and Development. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional  grouping  was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

    1. Environmental Health Effects Research

    2. Environmental Protection Technology

    3. Ecological Research

    4. Environmental Monitoring

    5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

    6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports  (STAR)

    7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development

    8. "Special" Reports

    9. Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the INTERAGENCY ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT series. Reports in this series result from the
effort funded  under the 17-agency  Federal  Energy/Environment Research and
Development Program. These studies relate to EPA's mission to protect the public
health and welfare from  adverse effects of pollutants associated with energy sys-
tems. The goal of the Program is to assure the rapid development of domestic
energy supplies in an environmentally-compatible manner by providing the nec-
essary environmental data and control technology. Investigations include analy-
ses of the transport  of energy-related pollutants and their health and ecological
effects;  assessments of, and development of, control technologies for energy
systems; and integrated assessments of a wide range of energy-related environ-
mental issues.
                        EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the participating Federal Agencies, and approved
for  publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Government, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                EPA-600/7-79-232c

                                     December 1979
    Assessment of  Diesel
      Particulate Control:
Particle Size Measurements
                    by

       Joseph D. McCain and M. Gregory Faulkner

            Southern Research Institute
            2000 Ninth Avenue, South
           Birmingham, Alabama 35205
             Contract No. 68-02-2610
                 Task No. 8
           Program Element No. EHE624A
        EPA Project Officer: Dennis C. Drehmel

      Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
    Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology
          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                 Prepared for

      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         Office of Research and Development
             Washington, DC 20460

-------
                           ABSTRACT



     The increasing appearance of the diesel engine on the



passenger car market has led to concern over particulate



emissions (smoke)  from these engines. Possible control stra-



tegies involving particulate collection in the hot exhaust



stream requires knowledge of the concentrations and size dis-



tributions of the particulate matter at exhaust conditions.



Tests were performed on an Oldsmobile 98 diesel automobile to



obtain data on these parameters typical of a light duty vehicle,



Data are presented for operations under four simulated driving



conditions.
                               11

-------
                           CONTENTS
Abstract	   ii
Figures	   iv
Tables	    v

    1.  Introduction	    1
    2.  Test Conditions	    3
    3.  Test Results	    7
    4.  Conclusions	   16
    5.  References	   17
                             111

-------
                            FIGURES


Number

  1     Modified exhaust pipe and test equipment layout
        for diesel emission testing	   5

  2     Particle size distribution for FET-cycle	   9

  3     Particle size distribution for 56 kmph no load
        condition.. .'	  10

  4     Particle size distribution for 56 kmph with
        load condition	  11

  5     Particle size distribution for 97 kmph condition..  12

  6     Relative concentration versus time for three
        particle size ranges during several FET cycles....  13

  7     Electron micrograph of diesel particulate	  14

-------
                            TABLES
Number                                                     Page



  I     Results of Cascade Impactor Sampling	     8
                               v

-------
                          SECTION 1



                         INTRODUCTION





     The federally mandated fuel economy standards for passenger



automobiles have resulted in considerable impetus being given



to the introduction of substantial numbers of diesel powered



automobiles into the passenger car fleet.  Unfortunately,  the



diesel engine has a much higher level of combustion by-products



than the spark ignition gasoline engine (by factors of 30  to 50



in particulate emissions).   The diesel particulate emissions are



primarily carbonaceous, but 10 percent to 50 percent by weight



of the material is adsorbed higher molecular weight organics, a



significant portion of which may be polycyclic aromatics.1  Pre-



liminary results of Ames microbial mutagenicity bioassay tests



have indicated the possibility that these particulates may be



carcinogenic.



     Possible methods for reducing diesel particulate emissions



are combustion modification or the use of aftertreatment devices



in the exhaust gas stream to collect and/or render the material



innocuous.  Such treatment may be mandatory if the emissions do



prove to represent a significant carcinogenic risk.  Selection



of candidate aftertreatment devices requires knowledge of  the



chemical and physical properties of the particles.  These  include



particle morphology, particle size distribution, bulk densities

-------
of the collected material, and particulate mass concentration



and emission rates in the exhaust gas stream.  Because the organic



fraction of the particles appears to be adsorbed on the surfaces



of graphitic carbon base particles,  the temperature history of



the gas stream may be important.  If the sorption process takes



place at elevated temperatures, then collection of the particu-



late at the normal, relatively hot,  exhaust gas temperatures



may be sufficient.  However, if the sorption takes place only



during and after cooling of the exhaust stream to near ambient



conditions, hot particle collection will not result in the removal



of the organic fraction.



     The data presented in the following chapters represent the



first of a planned series of experiments to characterize the



exhaust emissions from the point of view of aftertreatment exhaust



gas cleanup and to collect samples for bioassays to determine



whether the biological effects of particles collected at exhaust



line temperatures are the same as those collected after dilution



and cooling by ambient air.

-------
                           SECTION 2



                        TEST CONDITIONS





     The exhaust samples were obtained at the U.S. Environmental



Protection Agency facility located at Research Triangle Park,



North Carolina, from November 27 through December 1, 1978.  The



source of particulate was a 1979 Oldsmobile 88 with a 350 cubic



inch displacement diesel engine which was operated on a Burke E.



Porter No. 1059 Chassis Dynamometer.  The dynamometer was pro-



grammed to emulate the Clayton roadload curve for waterbrake dyna-



mometers which are used for vehicle certification.  Test conditions



included the 13 minute Fuel Economy Test (FET) combined city-highway



test cycle, 97 kmph highway cruise, 56 kmph highway cruise, and 56



kmph no load conditions.  However, the engine operating conditions,



the particulate sampling methods, and the exhaust temperature con-



ditions were all different from those required by EPA for vehicle



certification and the test results should not be compared to those



acquired by official certification methods and conditions.



     The vehicle operating conditions and experimental setup were



selected to provide samples collected at elevated exhaust gas



temperatures for the same engine cycle as the very large  (10 kg)



sample collected for bioassay work.  This 10 kg bioassay sample



was collected during the FET test cycle using a standard "con-



stant volume" automatic dilution tunnel.  The hot samples col-



lected were to be used for Ames tests to provide some indication

-------
of the relative mutagenicity of material collected at the exhaust



line temperatures and material collected after cooling and dilu-



tion.  This information is intended to provide some insight into



whether hot collection of the particles will remove the carcino-



genic component of the exhaust.



     Sampling and measurement methods included Andersen cascade



impactors, conventional filtration techniques followed by con-



densers and organic sorbent traps using XAD2 rosin, optical



single particle counters, and an electrical aerosol analyzer.



All samples were taken directly from a modified exhaust pipe



which was run out from under the chassis and down the passenger



side of the automobile to permit access to the exhaust stream.



Figure 1 is a diagrammatic sketch of the layout of the exhaust




system and measurement instrumentation during the tests.



     Andersen Model III cascade impactors with glass fiber



impaction substrates and backup filters were used to obtain



total particulate loadings and particle size distributions on



a mass basis over the size range from about 0.4 ymA to 5 pmA.



The impactors, which were operated in an oven, were close-



coupled to the exhaust pipe.  During runs at a steady engine



load (56 kmph and 97 kmph),  the oven was maintained at the same



temperature as the exhaust gas temperature at the sampling point.



During the 13 minute FET cycle testing, the impactors and ovens



were maintained at about the average exhaust gas temperature for



the cycle, 175°C.



     In addition to the cascade impactors, a Thermosystems Model

-------
                       BLOWER
                       EXHAUST
                       FOR ENGINE
                       COOLING
 STANDARD
 EXHAUST
 SYSTEM TO
 JUNCTION
DYNAMOMETER
ROLLERS
                                   I
                                   -I  I-
                                   I  I
                                   J  I.
                                                   SEDS
                                                              EAA
::n
                      OPTICAL
                      COUNTER
                                                HEAT TRACED
                                                SAMPLE LINE
                                                          OVEN FOR
                                                          IMPACTORS
                                                          AND FILTERS
                                                   MODIFIED EXHAUST
                                                   "PIPE
                                                           FLEXIBLE PIPE
                                                          •OUTSIDE OF
                                                           BUILDING
                                                                4181-288
        Figure 1.  Modified exhaust pipe and test equipment layout for
                 diesel emission testing.

-------
3030 Electrical Aerosol Analyzer (EAA) was used to determine



concentrations and size distributions of particles in the size



range of 0.01 ym to 0.5 ym.  Particle concentrations ranging



from 0.3 ym to 2.5 ym were monitored using a Royco Model 225



optical particle counter.  The Southern Research Institute



SEDS III sample extraction, conditioning, and dilution system



was used as an interface between the exhaust system and the EAA



and particle counter.  This system provides a mechanism for the



removal of condensible vapors from the sample gas stream at ele-



vated temperatures followed by quantitative dilution to particle



concentrations within the operating ranges of the measurement



instruments.



     The initial intent of the test program was to collect



particle samples at a number of points between the exhaust



manifold and the tailpipe in order to provide specimens col-



lected over a range of temperatures and engine loads.  These



data were to have provided information on changes in particle



size distribution and composition as the exhaust gases were



cooled.  Unfortunately, time limitations in preparing for and



performing the tests precluded carrying out the proposed plan.



Although it was found that a considerable swing in exhaust gas



temperature did occur with changes in engine load, it proved



impossible to differentiate between load/speed induced and



temperature induced concentration and composition changes in



the data obtained during this test.

-------
                           SECTION 3



                          TEST RESULTS





     Overall particulate loadings, engine gas flows,  and sampling



temperatures for the cascade impactor samples are given in Table



I.  Particle size distributions for the various conditions are



given in Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5.  Each figure in this series



contains a plot of cumulative percentage smaller than the indi-



cated diameter versus diameter from the impactor data alone and



that obtained by integrating the distributions from the electrical



aerosol analyzer up to 0.5 ym and continuing the integration



from 0.5 ym to 10 ym with the impactor data.  A particle density



of 1.0 g/cm3 was assumed for the integrations of the EAA data.



The overall size distributions from 0.01 ym to 10 ym obtained



in this fashion agree very well with those obtained from the



impactors alone.



     The variability in particulate concentrations through the



FET cycle is illustrated in Figure 6.  This shows particle con-



centrations versus time in three particle size intervals through



several test cycles.  These data were obtained using the optical



particle counter.



     Figure 7 is an electron micrograph of diesel parti-



culate collected on the backup filter of one of the Andersen



impactors.  These figures clearly show the branched,  chainlike

-------
                                  TABLE  I.   RESULTS OF  CASCADE  IMPACTOR SAMPLING
oo
                          Average exhaust
Average exhaust
temperature at
Aerodynamic
 mass median
Operating volume flowrate sampling location
mode (m3/s) (°C)
FET cycle
97 kmph
56 kmph
(with load)
56 kmph
(no load)
0.051
0.057
0.033
(Not Available)
177
218
149
129
Particulate
loading (mg/NCM)
68
55
45
39
particle diameter
(umA)
0.26
0.54
0.46
0.33

-------
99.99T
 99.8
     5
    99
    98

    95
    90

    80
    70
    50
    40
    30
    10
     5

     B

  0.5

  olli
 0.05^
 0.01
                              . IMPACTOR
                               ONLY
                   INTEGRATION OF
                  •EAA (0.01-0.5) AND IMPACTOR
                   (0.5-10)
     10
rE
     I  I I IHI|	1  III Mll|	1	1 I  I I l!l|
          10
ri
10P
101
      PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
                                          3858-6
          Figure 2. Particle size distribution for FET-cycle.

-------






LJ
U
LY
y
.ATIVE 1
_i
LJ




99.99
RR.RS
9979
99.8-
99.5-
99-
98-
95-
90-
80^
70-
BO1-
50^
40 i
30 i
EO]
10 ]
5:
ET
li
0.5^
O.E:
o.oi:
1C

i

1- «
• I""
1 tf
: T ti
- T ^r
1- IMPACTOR • *•**
ONLY •.*
: •* INTEGRATION OF EAA (0.01-0.5 pirn)
L i** 	 AND IMPACTOR (0.5-10 /urn)
i •
i. •
: •
.
•
•

rE lo'1 10° lo1
PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
                                       3858-5
  Figure 3. Particle size distribution for 56 kmph no load condition.
                 10

-------
99.99-

zjzj . y -
99. B -
99.5-
99-
98-
95:
90^
80^
701
601
50 i
401
301
20 1
10^
5:
Ei
±1
«
Biii
^^X fl ^^X ^^j •
OoOi4

•
B
:
1
•
K

: i
1
• Tjl 1-
r IMPACTOR ONLY^ ^lli
1 V1
: it1
•«
: 1
i- 0»f
: •*
; * INTEGRATION OF EAA (0.01-0.5 ptn
' *" AND IMPACTOR (0.5-10 urn)
\
'• *

•
•
c
A


10"5 10"1 10° 1C
PARTICLE DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
                                       3858-4
 Figure 4. Particle size distribution for 56 kmph with load condition.
                  11

-------





1-

e
CL
>
H
H
_J
*





99.99-
991 B:
99.5-
99 ^
98 ^
95:

901
80^
70 -i
50 \
50 4
401
z?1
1
10 1
li
0.5^
O.E^
n.n-i -
^
: < i

! i
: I
i i.
«
•;•*
" IMPACTOR ONLY 	 *9*»
\ ^jt

I •^_____INTEGATION OF EAA (0.01-0.5 Aim)
• AND IMPACTOR (0.5-10 A/m)
• 0
;
•
:
•
— *i j i < i H ii — i 1 1 1 1 H i-i — i— — i — 1 1 1 1 1 i-i
10'
             10
rl
10°
101
PARTICLE  DIAMETER  (MICROMETERS)
                                     3858-3
    Figure 5. Particle size distribution for 97 kmph condition.
                 12

-------
       ROYCO DIESEL FET CYCLE W/LOAD 11/30
                                                 9-10:40
CO
 o
 x

 V)
 8
1 1 1
CHANNEL 5


—


^^

__

_

—
O

r • o *
- * * *
' § e 1
i i i
i i i i i i
CHANNEL 1 0.36-0.63 pn CYCLE
CHANNEL 3 0.9-1.1 fJm NO.
CHANNEL 5 1.2-2.0 (Jm 1
2
3
A 4
<7 " 5
0 6
* 7
• 8
6 •
0 0 A
O

<7 °
i ' I •
* 1
I I I II I
1 1 1
START
TIME SYMBOL
8:58 O
9:11 O
9:24 tf
9:37 &
9:50 •
10:02 •
10:15 9
10:28 A


* V

8
? i °
A
1 1 1




—


^"™ *

_

__

—

_
—

n0
    14
    12
    10
 x   8

o
    4



    2



    0

  150

     i

  125
°100a

x
00  .,_
I-  75

D

8  50
    25
          CHANNEL 1
                                          1     1
                     i    !
                          ft
                                          i
                                                    i
                                     6    7    8    9

                                    CYCLE TIME, min
1 1 1 1 1 1
CHANNEL 3
v a
e
0

1 * O
" 5 • 7 9 6
A * "
	 ,
1 1 1 1 1 1

_


• O
A
° B . • -
« • 25°
••- 1 l • « -
i i i i i i
                                    »    •              a    •
                                    8    «    1    8    s    •
                                                         10   11   12   13
         Figure 6. Relative concentration versus time for three particle size

                  ranges during several FET cycles.
                                      13

-------

                                                                      3858-1
Figure 7.  Electron micrograph of diesel paniculate.
                           14

-------
structure which gives rise to the low bulk density associated



with diesel particulate.  The very small primary particle size



is also evident in Figure 7.



     The particulates collected at exhaust gas temperatures



were found to be approximately 15 percent by mass organics.  The



results of the biotesting of the samples from the impactors,



filters, and organic vapor traps will be reported elsewhere.
                               15

-------
                           SECTION 4



                          CONCLUSIONS






     Typical particulate concentrations at exhaust line con-



ditions for the Oldsmobile 350 CID diesel engine were found to



be about 50 mg/NCM.  Aerodynamic mass median diameters were



about 0.3 to 0.5 ym with the larger median diameters being



obtained from higher engine speed/load conditions under steady



state operating conditions.  The results reported here are



qualitatively similar in size distribution to those found by



other investigators in measurements of emissions from heavy duty



diesel engines insofar as the impactor data are concerned.2'3



     Additional particle size and composition data are required



under conditions where the engine speed and load can be main-



tained at a constant value while the exhaust gas temperature



is varied.   This data would determine the suitability of par-



ticle collection at exhaust gas temperatures and would help



define the need for cooling the collection device.
                              16

-------
                          SECTION 5

                          REFERENCES
1.  Blacker,  S. M.   EPA Program to Assess the Public Health
    Significance of Diesel Emissions.   Journal of the Air Pol-
    lution Control  Assoc.  Vol 28,  page 769,  August 1978.

2.  Lipkea, W.  H.,  J.  H. Johnson,  and C.  T.  Vuk.  The Physical
    and Chemical Character of Diesel Particulate Emissions -
    Measurement Technique and Fundamental Considerations.  SAE
    Paper #780108,  presented at the SAE Congress and Exposition,
    Detroit,  Michigan, February 27-March 3,  1978.

3.  Springer, K., and  R. Stahman.   Removal of Exhaust Particulate
    from a Mercedes 300D Diesel Car.  SAE Paper #770716, pre-
    sented at the SAE  Off-Highway Vehicle Meeting and Exhibition,
    Mecca, Milwaukee,  Wisconsin,  September 12-15, 1977.
                              17

-------
                                TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/7-79-232c
                           2.
                                                      3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 Assessment of Diesel Particulate Control:  Particle
  Size Measurements
                                 5. REPORT DATE
                                  December 1979
                                 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE

                                  SORI-EAS-79-778
 7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                      8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 Joseph D.  McCain and M.  Gregory Faulkner
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
 Southern Research Institute
 2000 Ninth Avenue,  South
 Birmingham, Alabama 35205
                                 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                 EHE624A
                                 11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.	

                                  68-02-2610,  Task 8
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 EPA, Office of Research and Development
 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD CO\
                                 Task Final; 11/78 - 11/79
                                                       COVERED
                                 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                   EPA/600/13
 is.SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES jERL-RTP project officer is Dennis C.  Drehmel,  Mail Drop 61,
 919/541-2925.
 16. ABSTRACT
          The report gives results of tests on an Oldsmobile 98 dies el automobile to
 obtain data on parameters typical of a light duty vehicle. Data are presented for
 operations under four simulated driving conditions. (The increasing appearance of
 the diesel engine on the passenger car market has led to concern over particulate
 emissions (smoke) from these engines.  Possible control strategies involving parti-
 culate collection in the hot exhaust stream requires knowledge of the concentrations
 and size distributions of the particulate  matter at exhaust conditions.) Typical parti-
 culate concentrations at exhaust line conditions for the 350 CID diesel engine were
 found to be about 50 mg/Ncm. Aerodynamic mass  median diameters were about 0.3
 to 0. 5 micrometers with the larger median diameters from higher engine speed/load
 conditions under steady state operation.  Test results are qualitatively similar in
 size distribution to those  found by other  investigators in measurements of emissions
 from heavy duty diesel engines insofar as the impactor  data are concerned. Addi-
 tional particle size and composition data are required under conditions where the
 engine speed/load can be  maintained at a constant  value while the exhaust temper-
 ature is varied. This data would determine the suitability of particle collection at
 exhaust gas temperatures and would help define collection device cooling needs.
 7.
                             KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                DESCRIPTORS
                     b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                        c. COS AT I Field/Group
 Pollution
 Dust
 Smoke
 Aerosols
 Diesel Engines
 Automobiles
Exhaust Gases
Pollution Control
Particulate
13B
11G
21B
07D
21G
13 F
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

 Release to Public
                     19. SECURITY CLASS (This Reportf
                     Unclassified
                        21. NO. OF PAGES
                             23
                     20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                     Unclassified
                                              22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                         18

-------