xvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA-600/7-86-011b
April 1986
Research and
Development
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
OF A COMMERCIAL BOILER FIRED WITH
A COAL/WASTE PLASTIC MIXTURE
Volume II. Data Supplement
Prepared for
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Prepared by
Air and Energy Engineering Research
Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7- Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the INTERAGENCY ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT series. Reports in this series result from the
effort funded under the 17-agency Federal Energy/Environment Research and
Development Program. These studies relate to EPA's mission to protect the public
health and welfare from adverse effects of pollutants associated with energy sys-
tems. The goal of the Program is to assure the rapid development of domestic
energy supplies in an environmentally-compatible manner by providing the nec-
essary environmental data and control technology. Investigations include analy-
ses of the transport of energy-related pollutants and their health and ecological
effects; assessments of, and development of, control technologies for energy
systems; and integrated assessments of a wide range of energy-related environ-
mental issues.
EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the participating Federal Agencies, and approved
for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Government, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
February 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF A COMMERCIAL BOILER
FIRED WITH A COAL/WASTE PLASTIC MIXTURE
Volume II
Data Supplement
By
R. DeRosier, H. I. Lips, and L. R. Waterland
Acurex Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, California 94039
EPA Contract 68-02-3188
EPA Project Officer: Joseph A. McSorley
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
For
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
CONTENTS
Section Page
1 Introduction 1~1
2 Preliminary Tests and Equipment Calibration 2-1
3 Boiler Operating Data 3"1
4 Sampling Data Sheets 4-1
4.1 Continuous Monitor Emission Data 4-3
4.2 Field Data Sheets for EPA Method 5/8, SASS,
HC1, and VOST Trains 4-19
6 Analytical Results 5-1
5.1 Fuel and Ash Sample Proximate and Ultimate
Analyses 5-3
5.2 Particulate Emissions from SASS Samples 5-7
5.3 Particulate and Sulfur Oxides Emissions from
EPA Method 5/8 Samples 5-15
5.4 HC1 Emissions from HC1 Train Samples 5-25
5.5 Trace Element and teachable Anion Analyses .... 5-35
5.6 Total Chromatographable Organics (TCO),
Gravimetric Organics (GRAV), Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), and Infrared Spectra
(IR) of Total Sample Extracts 5-83
5.7 Liquid Chromatography (LC) Separation and IR
Spectra of LC Fractions 5-97
5.8 GC/MS Analyses of VOST Traps 5-141
5.9 Mgi) Analyses by GC/ECD 5-145
5-lU dioassay Results 5-149
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this data supplement is to document data in greater
detail than was possible in Volume I (Technical Results) of this report. It
is intended to provide sufficient detail for researchers to perform their own
analysis of the data obtained. Readers are referred to the technical volume
for objectives, description of source emission results, data interpretation,
and conclusions.
The remaining sections of this data supplement contain the following
information:
Section 2 — Preliminary Tests and Equipment Calibration: stack velocity
traverse and nozzle sizing calculations, equipment calibration
records
Section 3 — Boiler Operating Data: pressures, temperatures, and flowrates;
efficiency calculations using the ASME heat loss method
Section 4 — Sampling Data Sheets: continuous monitor data sheets; operating
data tables for EPA Method 5/8 (for particulate mass emissions,
$02 and $03 sampling), SASS (for trace element and semi- and
nonvolatile organic sampling), HC1 train, and VOST (for volatile
organic sampling)
Section 5 — Analytical Results: fuel and ash sample proximate and ultimate
analyses; SASS particulate emissions; Method 5 particulate
1-1
-------
emissions; Method 8 sulfur oxides emissions; HC1 emissions;
trace element emissions by spark source mass spectrometry
(SSi'lS), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), and other methods,
and Teachable anions analyses by ion chromatography; total
cnromatographable organic (TCO) and gravimetric (GRAY) results,
determination of semivolatile organic priority pollutants by gas
cnrorna tography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), infrared (IR) spectra
of total sample extracts; liquid chromatography (LC) separation
results with IR spectra of eluted fractions; analyses of YOST
traps by GC/MS; NgO analyses by gas chromatography/electron
capture detector; and biological assay reports.
1-2
-------
SECTION 2
PRELIMINARY TESTS AND EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
2-1
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLANT , : . . >
DATE _ - -
SAMPLING LOCATION •••
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE B) _
STACK I.D.. (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR • ..-.-. ^ -..-
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
i
1
i
1
..
i
j
i
i
!
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
i
STACK I.D.
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
. ,.
• ; • '
. , .
EPA (Our) 232 "J
4,72
-------
r
a
2-4
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
PLANT
DATE
LOCATION
STACK 1.0..
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg : .- - •- -
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H;0 - . / D
OPERATORS.
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
.'
—
_-•
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
..-
-
- • --
•
• --
/ - •"*
STACK
TEMPERATURE
rrs), -F
; •*
' ~..
-; ~ /
- f •-•
• -.
•^ ~- *
2-.?.t
EPA (Our) 233
472
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
Ups), in.^O
STACK
TEMPERATURE
rrs>, -F
2-5
-------
Plant_
Date
ISOKINECTIC NOZZLE CALCULATION
AND
SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION
cr^-P Performed by
Sample Location
Test No./Type
k.25
k L' -
where: N )
( )4
^d
Tm
TS
AP
4H
K(Nd)4
.W
2-6
-------
P 1 ant
ISOKINECTIC SAMPLING WORKSHEET
/~/ *?>
0, 735
J*,u
%4l.tt
2-7
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
PLANT ' - - '
DATE - ' -
LOCATION __^__1____
STACK I.D. :
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg _J
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H20.
OPERATORS
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
(4ps), in.H20
--
••: - r-
- ••)-"7
. - •-
o.D^ir/
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts), 'F
^ 'L
_ " -'
- _
— ' >o
r " ~
^ i ^
-^.&
EPA (Our) 233 - . u
472 '*'^
2-8
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
r -
-
*"
'
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
&ps), in.H20
^ , ' /
< 'j
,:'•- *~
,
STACK
TEMPERATURE
rrs), -F
_ ;,' •
j
\ - -~
-
~ . ,
-------
ISOKINECTIC NOZZLE CALCULATION
AND
SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION
Plant_
Date
tf A'i
Performed by r
.Sample Location
Test No./Type
>H Ts Y25
TmAP/
where: Nd = Nozzel diameter (inches)
Average pressure differential across the
orifice meter (in. h^O)
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Temperature of gas meter, average (°F)
Stack gas velocity pressure (in h^O)
/ ( ) ( + 460) V25
\( ) ( + 460) ( )/
AH
TS
\
AP
Nd
\>t
3/j<7 . 2
10
.£47
MZ2
AH =
(AP)
where: AH = Pressure differential across the orifice meter (in H20)
Nozzel diameter, actual (inches)
Temperature of gas meter (°F)
Temperature of stack gas (°F)
Stack gas velocity pressure (in H20)
( ( ) ( )4 ! * 46°! ( A
\ — ( — + 460) ~~ /
Maqic number ^i .^i ol (.'^0
Nd
Tm
TS
AP
AH
K(Nd)4
/3*7
K-ll
2-9
-------
P 1 ant
Date
ISOKINECTIC SAMPLING WORKSHEET
- g ~S" Reformed by_
Sample Location ...flf/i/
Test No. /Type o?~ /X •
K = 782.687 (Cp)2 (1-BWO)2 Ps
Ms Pm
where: K = Contant of fixed and assumed parameters (dimensionless)
Pitot coefficient (dimensionless)
Water vapor in the gas stream
(proportion by volume)
Absolute stack gas pressure (in. Hg)
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
Orifice coefficient (dimensionless)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole) Md(l-Bwo) + 18(BWQ)
Abolute meter pressure (in. Hg)
782.687 ( )2 (1- )2 ( ) ( )
( )2 ( ) ( )
CP
BWO
PS
Md
KO
MS
Pm
K
,gco
,076
^
~ ,1U
'"* r - ' ^
\ , *)
^ ' o
rJ>1 -%$
/••-.?-
n^
;« ^
rtf.ClW
2-10
-------
ACUREX
Corporation
NOZZLE MEASUREMENT
B
DIAMETER
DIMENSION
A
DATE
B
C
D
E
F
RECORDED BY
AVG..
NOZZLE SERIAL
2-11
Form AC-?68 8 T8
-------
Module I
Date 5>
.p. y?-sr/
CONiliUI. MODULF CALIBRATION
Barometric Pressure (in. Hy)
Primary Meter 1.0.
Ambient Temperature ("f)
Operator Q-
Orifice
Size
Orifice
Reading
AH
(in H20)
Primary Meter
Gas Volume
Meter Box
Gas Volume
s
(ft3)
Temperature
Primary Meter
Inlet
Tpi
Outlet
Average
TP rn
Meter llox Meter
Inlet
Outlet
Tdo fF
Average
Time
0
(roin)
Meter
or ret lion
Factor
a
Orifice
oefficient
Small
Orifice
0.1B7
/I-WO
ro
i
Medium
Orifice
0.281
Large
Orifice
0.358
/.o
J.f
to
£.
3ai
'12JL
/.dio
/.all
JZ.
111
7 ?-
/.6/S-
B t AH \ (Tp *
Tttl H
460)
(pa)
46°)
Orifice
Small
Medium
Large
Avg. a
/•0/3-
Avg. K0
0-^S
-------
OH f t n
OHfle.
Hit
J£ &/>
ItTIK CALIBRATIW DATA
('».«* !
(In.
CM »«ij«
nw; %«•
1*1 f«!UM
fj T«{ Xttr-
(ft.')
*•«•
(*F)
V (*rj
Tt«t
lo'tt. Outlet.
'
3.2
see.
6.1
1.0
75"
2.2
S
7T
2.6
3.C
3.2
3 «
J.6
a B
« 0
4.4
4 «
4. a
s.o
- o.
-------
urn iQ-i- S*
T1K /' O '
•AKtMTTRIC PRCSSUK
WOiDfT TOff 7/'*
WOT TUK C -
STAKOMD PITOT TOM s
TEST SECTION LOCATION
OPEWTOM J C O
•OZZL£
SPACING
MTOT-TC WACIItt
PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION DATA
Ten Piut Tube
tf (in. •»!.)
Upper Leg Lover Leg
Pi tot Tube
S title
Pmsurc
(In. «S-)
fas
T«p
Cf)
Met ftulb
TW
(•r)
Test Section
7V
J f)
t
2-14
-------
am
•n* / ~,' 3
WROKTTR1C «t£SSU8£
•KBinrr
TtSTPJTOT
STWOWD PITOT TUBE -J'
& TEST SECTION LOCATION
OPEWTOIB J f£
PiTOT TUBE CALIBRATION DATA
wzzu sin
MOZZLt-riTOT SPACING
PITOT-TC SPACIH5
Test Pilot Tube
tf (In. 09.)
Upper l»9
/.vfiH
/, V
/ , ','-
« ^ ' /
». •" :."
. • ~7-
. •-•'• ^~
Lower Leg
. "^x
• J.
/
, x'i-
•^> ^
/. '* *"
-i ' .»'
/ «r
Stindtrtf
Pttfit Tube
tf (in. .9.}
/
• *• '
. 9$
•' V
f- -
/
** -
« ~
••' ^
, .. /
. <~.\.*~~
'.•• .^
-. -^
f_ _^
. / V
/ . ' /
'-' y
/<-x^
/. /?>
•
s
*
^Cry
^.^
^s "V
^r-/'
<# -- f
^v^f
^v'ty
^ -2-
Z+v
r~s • *• ••
X ~ •/
A / /"
7^9
^->
^•^
--ry'
^O
SUtle
Presturt
(1». -8-J
(«s
T«np
CF)
Hrt Bulb
T«op
CF)
..,.
Test Section
Velocity
(fp«)
-
2-15
-------
SECTION 3
BOILER OPERATING DATA
3-1
-------
7-6-83
Time
430
625
645
705
715
730
750
805
825
d40
945
1000
1030
1100
1130
1145
1200
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1400
1415
1430
1445
1500
1515
1530
1545
1600
1615
1630
1645
1700
1715
1730
Feedwater
flow
(total gal)
20.0
231.1
268.6
281.7
335.0
400.0
457.6
552.4
626.0
1,057.0
1,151.0
1,381.1
1,550.0
1,738.3
1,846.0
1,939.0
2,044.8
2,148.0
2,217.9
2,311.2
2,425.7
2,515.7
2,710.3
2,795.1
2,873.5
2,970.1
3,035.9
3,120.2
3,204.9
3,243.8
3,387.8
3,487.5
3,562.1
3,645.4
3,720.3
3,802.0
3,890.6
Feedwater
temperature
(°F)
—
60
60
60
58
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
54
56
54
55
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
Steam
pressure
(psig)
—
7
7
7
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
1.5
2
2.5
2.5
2
2
2.5
3
3
2
2
2.5
2
1.5
2
2
2.5
3
3
2
2
2
2
2.5
2
Fuel flow
(Ib/hr
nominal
setting) Comment
Start fuel feed, boiler on
—
300
300
300
300
300
300
300 Increase feedwater flow
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300 SASS start; Method 5/8
start
300
300
300
300
300 Method 5/8 stop
300
300
300
300
300
300
300 HC1 start
300
300 HC1 stop
300
300
300
300 SASS stop
300
300
300 Terminate fuel flow
Total fuel fed
asn
= 3,094 Ib. Collect 405 Ib bottom ash, 12.5 Ib cyclone hopper
3-3
-------
JMMARY SHEET
ASME TEST FORM
FOR ABBREVIATED EFFICIENCY TEST
PTC 4.1-0(1964)
TEST NO i BOILER NO.
DATE . . . -
CW-R OF PLANT /• : ^ •'-• i - LOCATION
T£. CONDUCTED BY OBJECTIVE OF TEST
DURATION
30ILER. MAKE 4 TYPE RATED CAPACITY
STOKER. TYPE 4 SIZE
PULVERIZER. TYPE A SIZE BURNER, TYPE
FUEL USED '" : ,- MINE COUNTY STATE
PRESSURES & TEMPERATURES FUEL DAI
1
2
3
4
5
A
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
STEAM PRESSURE IN BOILER DRUM
STEAM PRESSURE AT S. H. OUTLET
STEAM PRESSURE AT R. H. INLET
STEAM PRESSURE AT R. H. OUTLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT S. H. OUTLET '
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT R.H. INLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT R.H. OUTLET
WATER TEMP. ENTERING (ECON. HBOILER)
STEAM QUALITY!". MOISTURE OR P. P.M.
AIR TEMP- AROUND BOILER (AMBIENT)
TEMP. AIR FOR COMBUSTION
(This is Reference Temoerature) T
TEMPERATURE OF FUEL
GAS TEMP. LEAVING (Boiler) (Econ.) (Air Htr.)
GAS TEMP. ENTERING AH (H condition! to be
psia
.psia
psia
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
17.0
5V-
2 -"
_C __' '
*> r"
1 UNIT QUANTITIES
15
16
17
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ENTHALPY OF SAT. LIQUID (TOTAL HEAT)
ENTHALPY OF (SATURATED) (SUPERHEATED)
STM.
ENTHALPY OF SAT. FEED TO (BOILER)
(ECON.)
ENTHALPY OF REHEATED STEAM R.H. INLET
ENTHALPY OF REHEATED STEAM R. H.
OUTLET
HEAT A3S/L3 OF STEAM (ITEM 16 -ITEM 17)
HEAT ABS/LS R.H. STEAM (ITEM 19-ITEM 18)
DRY REFUSE (ASH PIT + FLY ASH) PER LS
AS FIRED FUEL
Btu PER LB IN REFUSE (WEIGHTED AVERAGE)
CARBON BURNED PER LB AS FIRED FUEL
DRY GAS PER LB AS FIRED FUEL BURNED
Bru/lfa
Btu/lb
Btu/Ib
Btu/lb
8fu/Ib
Btu/Ib
Btu/Ib
Ib/lb
Btu/lb
Ib/lb
Ib/!b
HOURLY QUANTITIES
26
27
23
29
30
31
ACTUAL WATER EVAPORATED
REHEAT STEAM FLOW
RATE OF FUEL FIRING (AS FIRED wt)
TnTil HFAT INPi;T (Item 28 X Item 41)
1000
HEAT OUTPUT IN SLOW-DOWN WATER
HEAT (''"" 26»ltem 201*(hem 27»llem 21)+|, in
OUTPUT 1000
Ib/hr
Ib/nr
IbAr
kB/nr
kBAr
kB/hr
14?, 1
1 1 H '.
32. /
' . 3.;.i
»/ , w""~
727
•' — 7' •„'
FLUE GAS ANAL. (BOILER) (ECON) (AIR HTR) OUTLET
32
33
34
35
36
CO,
o,
CO
Nj (BY DIFFERENCE)
EXCESS AIR
r. VOL
% VOL
r. VOL
% VOL
% 1
fi. *
7. -
-^
•J
'-:-"••'
COAL AS FIRED
PROX. ANALYSIS
37
38
39
40
MOISTURE
VOL MATTER
FIXED CARBON
ASH
TOTAL
41
42
Btu per Ib AS FIRED
ASH SOFT TEMP.'
ASTM METHOD
% wt
2,"' '-'
-7, ,.
T7.
"
:3 •
COAL OR OIL AS FIRED
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS
43
44
45
46
47
40
37
CARBON
HYDROGEN
OXYGEN
NITROGEN
SULPHUR
ASH
MOISTURE
TOTAL
• °* j -*
.-•T. "2.
tl. 6
i • £"
* * —
-.'" ~
_ . "7
COAL PULVERIZATION
48
49
50
64
GRINDABILITY
INDEX*
FINENESS STHRU
50 M-
FINENESS % THRU
200 M*
INPUT-OUTPUT
EFFICIENCY OF UNIT %
51
52
S3
44
41
4 SIZE
SIZE AS FIRED
A
OIL
FLASH
POINT F*
Sp. Gravity Deg. API*
VISCOSITY AT SSU*
BURNER SSF
TOTAL
% wt
Btu per
HYDROGEN
Ib
GAS
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
CO
CH4 METHANE
C,H, ACETYLENE
C,H4 ETHYLSNE
CjH« ETHANE
H,S
CO,
H3
HYDROGEN
TOTAL
62
63
41
TOTAL
7. wt
HYDROGEN
%YOL
DENSITY 68 F
ATM. PRESS.
Btu PER CU FT
Btu PER LB
ITEM 31 >
100
.
t
ITEM 29
HEAT LOSS EFFICIENCY
65
66
67
63
69
70
71
72
HEAT LOSS DUE TO DRY GAS
HEAT LOSS DUE TO MOISTURE IN FUEL
HEAT LOSS DUE TO H,0 FROM COMB. OF H,
HEAT LOSS DUE TO COMBUST. IN REFUSE
HEAT LOSS DUE TO RADIATION
UNMEASURED LOSSES
TOTAL
EFFICIENCY ~(100
- Item 71)
* Not Required for Efficiency Testing
Btu/lb
A. F. FUEL
% of A. F.
FUEL
• , r
, • — :•
V-, ~
~>
.
t Far Point of Measurement See Par. 7.2.8.1-PTC 4.1-1964
-------
CALCULATION SHEET
ASME TEST FORM
FOR ABBREVIATED EFFICIENCY TEST
PTC4.1-t> (1964)
Revised September, 1965
OWNER OF PLANT
30
«
25
36
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
2
HEAT OUTPUT IN BOILER SLOW-DOWN
If impractical to weigh refuse, this
item can be estimated as fallows •
DRY REFUSE PER LB OF AS FIRED FUE
ITEM 43
CARBON BURNED
FUEL 1QO .
TEST NO. BOILER NO. DATE
" ITEM 15 ITEM 17"
WATER =L3 OF WATER SLOW-DOWN Ppq Ha, x ~
1000
% ASH IN AS FIRED COAL
100 _ r. COMB. IN REFUSE SAMPLE p,"T R"Epus'e
kS/lir
LUE DUST & ASH
DIFFER MATERIALLY
r- -, IN COMBUSTIBLE CONTENT, THtY
ITEM 2. 'TEW 23 SHOULD BE ESTIMATED
• • x " '' • SEPARATELY. SEE SECTION 7,
,4500 = LUMPU 1 A ! lUNi.
DRY GAS PER LB 11CO, + 80, + 7 (N3 + CO) '•
BURNED - 3(C0' * C0)
ITEM 32
3 X
C0
AIR t = 100 X
.2632N, - (n_ _ CO
2
ITEM 33 [ITEM 35 ITEM 34 j ITEM 24
...7.. * 7\. ..*•:. + .::K./ x ..*.;.:.
/ITEM 32 ITEM 34 \ [__ '
V /
ITEM 34
inn t ' =
•4-"
ITEM 47
267 J
' .2482 (ITEM 35) - (ITEM 33 - 1TEM 34 )
2
HEAT LOSS EFFICIENCY
HEAT LOSS DUE LB DRY GAS
TO DRY GAS = PER L3 AS XC
FIRED FUEL p
HEAT LOSS DUE TO LB H30 PER LB
MOISTURE IN FUEL "AS FIRED FUEL
- (ENTHALPY OF
AT 1 PSIA i T IT
HEAT LOSS DUE TO H20 FROM COMB. 0
_ , x ITEM ** x [(ENTHALPY OF V
_ft. ,., ITEM 25 (ITEM 13) -(ITEM 11)
X ("ivg — ratr) - X0.24 =
^— * " '^'^ '
X [(ENTHALPY OF VAPOR AT I PSIA 4 T GAS LVG)
LIOIMD AT T A'R)] - 'TEM, ,— * [(p.NTHALPY OF VAPOR
100
F H, = 9H, X [(ENTHALPY OF VAPOR AT 1 PSIA & T GAS
LVG) - (ENTHALPY OF LIQUID AT T AIR)]
4.POR AT 1 PSIA & T ITEM 13) - (ENTHALPY OF LIQUID AT
HEAT LOSS DUE TO ITEM 22 ITEM 23
COMBUSTIBLE IN REFUSE = . _ X .. . • =
HEAT LOSS DUE TO TOTAL BTU RADIATION LOSS PER HR
RADIATION- LB AS FIRED
FUEL — ITEM 28
UNMEASURED LOSSES *•
TOTAL
EFFICIENCY = (100 - ITEM 71)
Bt«/lb
AS FIRED
FUEL
I ,' ' **
-. .'
_
LOSS x
100 =
65
X 100 =
41
— X 100 =
41
67
_ — X 100 =
41
63
- x,oo =
6?
X 100 =
41
21 X ,00 =
41
LOSS
•'- . — '
, .' -•
~"
'- / -.'
- -
.
~- . •
~7 1'. ^
Far ,;,oroul Jel.fmino lion ol ».e.i« «" »«« App.ndi, 9.2 - PTC 4.1-1964
It U,,.» ,,, no. m»olur,
-------
7-7-83
Time
530
d3U
845
9UO
915
930
945
1000
1015
1030
1045
1100
1115
1130
1145
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1345
1400
1415
1430
1445
1500
1515
1530
1545
1600
1615
1630
1645
1700
1715
1730
1745
1752
Feedwater
flow
(total gal)
4,733.5
4,799.4
4,860.9
4,924.8
5,012.7
5,097.8
5,185.3
5,278.0
5,363.0
5,473.6
5,555.1
5,660.8
5,785.9
5,892.1
6,093.0
6,196.4
6,287.5
6,391.6
6,483.5
6,603.1
6,708.1
6,816.5
6,922.7
7,003.8
7,111.2
7,237.2
7,320.0
7,417.7
7,503.8
7,585.2
7,670.0
7,747.0
7,815.6
7,887.0
7,948.1
7,976.1
8,018.6
8,032.0
Feedwater
temperature
CF)
55
55
56
54
54
55
55
54
54
54
54
54
54
55
55
55
55
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
55
55
54
56
56
57
57
57
57
Steam
pressure
(psig)
2
2.5
2
3
2
2.5
2
2.5
3.5
2.5
4
3
3
3.5
3
3
4
4
4
4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3
4.5
3.5
4
7
7
7.5
4.5
2
1
1
1
(0.5)
0
Fuel flow
Ob/hr
nominal
setting)
300
300
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
300
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
Comment
Start fuel feed, boiler on
SASS start; increase fuel
flow
Method 5/8-2 start
Method 5/8-2 stop
HC1-2 start
HC1-2 stop
HC1-3 start
SASS stop, HC1-3 stop
VOST start
VOST stop
Method 5/8-3 start
Method 4/8-3 stop
Terminate fuel flow
Total fuel feed = 2,976.5 Ib = 2,489 Ib coal + 487.5 Ib PET.
bottom ash, 8 Ib cyclone hopper ash.
3-6
Collect 237.5 Ib
-------
MMARY SHEET
ASME TEST FORM
FOR ABBREVIATED EFFICIENCY TEST
PTC 4.1-0(1964)
TEST NO. H. BOILER NO.
w
•c
-R OF PLANT r. . -• ' /*• .; - LOCATION
CONDUCTED BY OBJECTIVE OF TEST
DATE T - -" '
DURATION
.OILER. MAKE S, TYPE RATED CAPACJTY
TOKER. TYPE i SIZE
'ULVERIZER. TYPE 4. SIZE BURNER, TYPE
•UELUSED ~ •; f- ..- / /-.-; - MINE COUNTY STATE
1 SIZE
SIZE AS FIRED
PRESSURES 4 TEMPERATURES FUEL DATA
1
2
3
4
5
4
7
3
9
0
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
:o
"
!2
23
24
25
STEAM PRESSURE IN BOILER DRUM
STEAM PRESSURE AT S. H. OUTLET
STEAM PRESSURE AT R. H. INLET
STEAM PRESSURE AT R. H. OUTLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT S. H. OUTLET'
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT R.H. INLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT R.H. OUTLET
WATER TEMP. ENTERING (ECON.) (BOILER)
STEAMQUAL1TY% MOISTURE OR P. P.M.
AIR TEMP. AROUND BOILER (AMBIENT)
TEMP. AIR FOR COMBUSTION
TEMPERATURE OF FUEL
GAS TEMP. LEAVING (Boiler) (Econ.) (Air Htr.)
GAS TEMP. ENTERING AH (If conditions to be
corrected to
i ,"j -^ "
j
,"7 o 1
11.7 '
FLUE GAS ANAL. (BOILER) (ECON) (AIR HTR) OUTLET
CO,
o.
CO
N, (BY DIFFERENCE)
EXCESS AIR
% VOL
% VOL
% VOL
% VOL
*
r*. 9
^ . •*.
-•' . ' i
!
~?~?
COAL AS FIRED
PROX. ANALYSIS
37
38
39
40
MOISTURE
VOL MATTER
FIXED CARBON
ASH
TOTAL
41
42
Btu per Ib AS FIRED
ASH SOFT TEMP.*
ASTM METHOD
% wt
, 5 '''-_'
COAL OR OIL AS FIRED
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS
43
44
45
46
47
40
37
CARBON
HYDROGEN
OXYGEN
NITROGEN
SULPHUR
ASH
MOISTURE
TOTAL
i "
."• '"
, -'
: "-
•- . '•.;'
^ ( s
•i- I ""*
V .- . .'
COAL PULVERIZATION
4S
49
50
64
GRINDABILITY
INDEX-
FINENESS XTHRU
50 M*
FINENESS Ti THRU
200 M*
INPUT-OUTPUT
EFFICIENCY OF UNIT 7.
51
52
53
44
41
OIL
FLASH
POINT F'
Sp. Gravity Deg. API*
VISCOSITY AT SSU*
BURNER SSF
TOTAL
% wt
Btu per
HYDROGEN
Ib
GAS
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
CO
CH4 METHANE
C,H, ACETYLENE
C,H, ETHYLENE'
dH4 ETHANE
H,S
CO,
H,
HYDROGEN
TOTAL
62
63
41
TOTAL
% wf
HYDROGEN
%VOL
DENSITY 68 F
ATM. PRESS.
Btu PER CU FT
Btu PER LB
ITEM 31 i
• 100
;
t
ITEM 29
HEAT LOSS EFFICIENCY
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
HEAT LOSS DUE TO DRY GAS
HEAT LOSS DUE TO MOISTURE IN FUEL
HEAT LOSS DUE TO H20 FROM COMB. OF H3
HEAT LOSS DUE TO COMBUST. IN REFUSE
HEAT LOSS DUE TO RADIATION
UNMEASURED LOSSES
Btu/lb
A. F. FUEL
TOTAL
EFFICIENCY =(100 - hem 71)
"Not Required for Efficiency T"'ing
% of A. F.
FUEL
~7, ^
-- ' ' 6
~~ • "3
t- ~~
,
*~- - j' ~»
•71:-; •
3-7
t For Poinf of Meoiur.m.nt See Por. 7.2.8.1-PTC 4.1- 1964
-------
CALCULATION SHEET
ASME TEST FORM
FOR ABBREVIATED EFFICIENCY TEST
PTC 4.1-b (1964)
Rev.W September, 1965
20
24
25
36
65
66
67
63
47
70
71
2
OWNER OF PLANT TEST NO. BOILER NO. DATE
f ITEM 15 ITEM 17
HEAT OUTPUT IN BOILER SLOW-DOWN WATER =LB OF WATER SLOW-DOWN PER HR x —
1000
If impractical to weigh refuse, this
item can fee estimated as follows
% ASH IN AS FIRED COAL
100 - % COMB. IN REFUSE SAMPLE PlY REFUSE
r— — i IN COMBUST
ITEM 43 F7TEM22 ITEM 23 | ^ SHOULD BE
CARBON BURNED ~7 ! , '- , ' • " ^ i < .- ? . / - - SEPARATEL
kB/hr
LUE DUST & ASH
DIFFER MATERIALLY
ISLE CONTENT, THEY
ESTIMATED
Y. SEE SECTION 7,
PER LB AS FIRED = = COMPUTATIONS.
FUEL 10D • L '-OHO . J .
DRY GAS PER LB 11CO, + 80, + 7(N, + CO) ' " "
BURNED 3(C0' * C0) / \ p
ITEM 32 ITEM 33 | ITEM 35 ITEM 34 1 ITEM 24
11 x ;_ , ~> + 3 x r-,-2. + 7 \ f , .'' + C. '• .•' / - , ~ „- 7
_ ••••• •••*•» \ *.«..• * * • • 4 * / A •*••••
/ITEM 32 ITEM 34 \ [_ '
3 X I . iV.'.7. + .?i : j . I
V /
cxc— n, _ C0 ,TBU« _ ITEW34
iio t - inn x . - inn Y ^ =
.2682N, - (0, - CO
7 .2(|;S2 (ITEM 35} - (|TgM 73 _ _. cm •"" )
2
HEAT LOSS EFFICIENCY
HEAT LOSS DUE LB DRY CAS ITEM 25 (ITEM 13) -(ITEM 11)
TO DRY GAS = PERLS AS XC X ('Iv, _ 'Oir) = X0.24 , =
FIRED FUEL " Unit .:'.'- 'r ' •
^fsTUUR°ESS,N UFEUETL° ' ASS "iRED^EL " t (HNTHALPY OF VAPOR AT , PSIA 4 T GAS LVG,
- (ENTHALPY OF LIQUIQAT T AIR)] = E 37 x[(£HTHALPr OF VAPOR
100
HEAT LOSS DUE TO H,0 FROM COMB. OF H3 = 9H, X [(ENTHALPY OF VAPOR AT 1 PSIA & T CAS
' LVG) - (ENTHALPY OF LIQUID AT T AIR)]
- 9 i ITEM u t [(ENTHALPY OF VAPOR AT 1 PSIA & T ITEM 13) - (ENTHALPY OF LIOUIO AT
100 T ITEM 11)] =
HEAT LOSS DUE TO ITEM 22 ITEM 23
COMBUSTIBLE IN REFUSE = x =
HEAT LOSS DUE TO TOTAL BTU RADIATION LOSS PER HR
RADIATION- LB AS FIRED FUEL - ITEM 23
UNMEASURED LOSSES —
TOTAL
EFFICIENCY = (100 -ITEM 71)
•*4-s) -
ITEM 47
267 J
-, -.,
Btu/lb
AS FIRED
FUEL
-
- — • .
:
LOSS x
100 =
65
x 100 =
41
^i X 100 =
41
67
XlOO =
41
68
— XlOO =
41
69
41
21X100:
41
LOSS
7. .2
, ^.
•r >
/, Z
- -
"7 ; _• -
f
t Fof figo.aul
• I/ lan.J <•'
^«a,u,,<( UJ, A8MA
,u,,
-------
SECTION 4
SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
4.1 CONTINUOUS MONITOR EMISSION DATA
4.2 FIELD DATA SHEETS FOR EPA METHOD 5/8, SASS, HC1, AND VOST TRAINS
4-1
-------
4.1 CONTINUOUS MONITOR EMISSION DATA
4-3
-------
Plant
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Time
(24-hr
clock)
,/Y-o
/•'" :.<,'""
/ I , s. , ' •>.
A-r
/>/«
/.2/f
/ />,
//..^"
/>>"-
/,^
/M
/M'
/ ;')'(::
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(In. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(•F)
/- "
/
(•'
1'
^ .
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
f'
• v
..•/,.
Yi
NOx+NH3h
(ppm)
'-. &(..
<6tfn'f
•;](. A
NOXC
(ppra)
r"
N02d
(ppm)
NH3e
(ppm)
Sample Gas
Temperature
(°F)
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
NOX
(ppm)
/'"
; - -
-,
/ /'
A- '.
M"
'j ^
;.A?
X^
/:.,''
/So
\.
N0?
(ppm)
°?
(I)
/ ( '
r • *
/ ,
i (•-
', !
/ '"
/.v
'/<
"i •
A:I
/.^-
/^
A/
co?
(«]
/ / •
/; ^
/^V.
•••/ 7
/'' (>.
• 1 7
- ' t
i-i,'
!' I
7<:'
") i
i
CO
(t)
CO
(ppm)
/ .' -'
.' '!
^^
/ / , "
. i *• ' .'
/^.-
// I-
V'j
• V
.' <••
iJ '
TUHC
(ppm)
/i
i ,'
1 !_
•-
h
/
•• i
/(-
/'.
(
(
c
^
<
Sample Gas
Temperatur
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion)
bNOx + NHi = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNOX = sample path through molybdenum converter
dN02 = NO - NO
eNH3 = (NOx
Notes:
NH3) -
cn
-------
Plant
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Time
(24-hr
clock)
/•}<<-
/?,,
/. ; ,- >
) \ , o
/?/';
/Mi
/ 1 y s
/.^
IW'
/I'/*
IH '
/r--
> t^s
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(In. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(°F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO4
(PPm)
/
NOx+»H3b
(ppm)
' i
.. j, /
NOXC
(ppm)
N02d
(ppmi)
NH3e
(ppm)
Sample Gas
Temperature
(°F)
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
'A
NOX
(ppm)
/','.;
/,
^
^ f,f
i ',
^- , -•' : '
2/r
^•L
//s'
^
// v>
.^(.''
/' ' ','"
' 1
/'/"
N02
(ppm)
°?
(*)
•'' ',
t
/
' /
/ r*
' j
/^.
/ c •
. . »i
CO
(ppm)
,- (
A •
'/•;
'.A-
' '<;
t ' f
/ '
( '
!"/•
/''••'
'/:-•
/••'"•-'
/:/-
/•• '
4',*
TIJHC
(ppm)
V
f
I
1
/!
P
//
'/
V
/
/x
/ .»
Sample Ga'
Temperatuc
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion)
bNOx \ NHi = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
dN02 = NO, - NO
eNH3 = (NO* + NH3) - N0y
Notes:
er>
-------
Plant
Location
Date
v
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
WM-.Jt /i,/,
/' <•> - •>' J
Time
(24-hr
clock)
/you
/VoC
/V'Vo
/
/yn
///'
,///<-
/
/S(>
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
UBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
{in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
<°F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
NOx+NH3h
(ppm)
NOXC
(ppm)
N02d
(ppm)
NHae
(ppm)
Sample Gas
Temperature
(Of)
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
,
NOX
(ppm)
/ f
M,
;- "
2.x-
M'
^
/%'
/'/L'
// :.'
//<:
/vc-
z ,
A .--
N0?
(ppm)
°?
m
(•^
(,c
t s
/ j1
i 1
?a
Sf
?.f
/•2
V/
/ >
//
7*
co?
(*f
/^7
/JV
/^
Ay i;
/>-3
//^
A ?
A /
7.7
f.7
/fi,i
/,:•.<',
//<
CO
(t)
CO
(ppm)
We
J/i}
;."0
; ,' -!
A-,.
X-o
^v-
-1 /
,?,A:
7«; C'-
A «:,
//r-
/.4
TUHC
(ppra)
/(.
?
/, .
/ I.-' ;
/,/-
/ -,
/ /'
/'J
/•*
/s
/'/
/
1 1
/ /
•" /
Sample Ga
Temperatu
(°F)
a'NO -= direct sample measurement (no conversion)
DNOx + NHi = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
NO^ = NO - NO
eNH3 = (NOx + NHj) - N0y
Notes:
-------
Plant
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location
Date /
Time
(24-hr
clock)
/ > d S
/^
/S/)'
/VA-
/VH"
AJc
/Stf
AY*'
/•s'yS
/V>u'
/<•; >ST
/^l
/JO''
Ambient
Temperature
(«F)
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(«F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
NOx+NH3b
(ppm)
VV*-'
/)'.//.,
N0xc
(ppm)
_
-^
N02d
(ppm)
./«-'
NH3e
(ppm)
/) f'l s
Sample Gas
Temperature
(°F)
;
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
NOX
(ppm)
Ac'
^,Y
/*'-'
/n.
/?.
/{,•
//<:
/>: .
//^.
/•/J
A-i.
/?^.'-
N02
(ppm)
°?
(%)
'/C
'/<;
U't
/J f
'JS
v.i
&$
u.i
£•*
I*
d> (
"> C
£S
co?
(«)
// ,/
' Ix
//^
<.<"
^5-
/ /
(. 5
6 ^
^"
•ft**
1^
n ii
//s
.•./^ •«-/
/>^
CO
(*)
CO
ppm)
'/'
/A
//(•
/y( '
/^
Vt1
/c
"/i
ft. -
/rt1
i ."-
i jt.
/v
/^--
IIMC
ppm)
//
//
/
<' 'l
f
-
u
1
?
/
i.
-}
Sample Ga?
emperatui
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion)
bNOx + Nlh = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
dNO? = NO - NO
eNH3 » (NOx + NH3)
Notes:
I
oo
-------
Plant
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIEID OATA
Location
Date
U 'Nft..ii 0.
Time
(24-hr
clock)
//>
/(Ji
1 i /i
llr L f
/H>
/Oi
It-h
M<
/r-
li •> *
1 IOC
/U>"
II/L-
Ambient
Temperature
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(In. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(PPm)
(ppm)
N0xc
(ppm)
(ppm)
NH3e
(ppm)
Sample Gas
Temperature
rn
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
NOX
(ppm)
#r
//•;
Itf
IK
&L
;,,
A'-L
.^
.7/6-
J>»
2ti
(ppm)
(ft
n
7^
'H
&'i
tS
7.o
/*
?s
73
7^
'M
CO-,
(*)
A;7
/^.^
IJ /
A4
M3
//<]
//•*
//?
//•v
7M'
//^
CO
CO
(ppm)
/SV;
77. r.
//.':
PC
IU:
fr ,
•A-c
U"
-'i ,
&*
7^-
TUHC
(ppm)
/
7
//
//
Sample Gas
Temperatur
(•F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion) NO^
bNOx t NHi = sample path through stainless steel converter eNH3 =
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
= NO - NO
Notes:
-------
Plant /''
Location
' / /
. J. <•• I
I '" /
.\j^ At-.
•A(^
Date /" / £ 0
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Time
(24-hr
clock)
c%^
C-'V^V
o v /£
r'-V/'f
c''7'JfO
o?A
r//4c
07^"
#?Ys
^s
/•
y.3
/V
CO
(*)
CO
(ppm)
^^
in)
K\
£r
^
•J-v
'}.(-.>'
**->
If'
it r;
(^
/^^
/<:•
TUHC
(ppm)
•'}
J
.*
i
j
V
u
V
5
j
'1
•}
j
i
)
J
jf
;?
Sample r,a<
Temperatui
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion)
bNOx + NHi = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNOX = sample path through molybdenum converter
dN02 = NO - NO
eNH3 = (Nftx + NH3) - NOX
Notes:
-------
Plant
P I I i
/V. i < >i, <. ' '•A 11
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location jt« v ..• ,
"7 )
Date / /-
•
/A-i /*.•
Time
(24-hr
clock)
/tc'f
/o/u
/i>/ >"'
/c^>
/O-JiS
/C 1C-
/Oi 5
M*
A-/5
/t.-$0
/o£f
//ov
s/»f
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
MBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(°F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
NOx+NH3h
(ppm)
/kn
NOXC
(ppm)
ftf
N02d
(ppm)
i
NH3e
(ppra)
Sample Gas
Temperature
(°F)
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
/'/£
/K
m
Nflx
(ppm)
/(^
/6V
/k>
n(>
/
-------
Plant
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Time
(24-hr
clock)
IUV
//A"
//A.
/af
/Ml'
/7JK
///o
//'/5
/h'u
//ss
/Z^u
/JiS'
III*
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
WBT
DOT
Barometric
Pressure
(In. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(°F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
NOx+NH3b
(ppm)
r-i
*i
NOXC
(ppm)
A.iy.
i/
t '
| i.' f TV.
NOgd
(ppni)
•''/
/
( ,,,
NH3e
(ppm)
/Xc
,/x^'
N02
(ppm)
ro
-------
Plant
c'"/
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location .y 1..J f-{
Date 7 ' 7 ' '6 $
Time
(24-hr
clock)
/J/?
1)3*
/;js
/>Jc>
/Xtt
/^o
y^f
/^D
/.* ) ''>
/M
/JO >
lit*
n/<
Ambient
Temperature
WBT
OBT
Barometric
Pressure
(in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(PPm)
J
(ppm)'
/" 7( "A
N0xc
(ppm)
7*
N02d
(ppm)
(ppm)
'/ / /
Sample Gas
Temperature
-,
Cold Sample Line Analysis (dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
,„•*
NO
(ppm)
,J"<>
NOX
(ppm)
M
JU
19 o
/7l;
£t$'
iic
2cL
m
/^
/r>
:^ v
/^
y
(ppm)
(Jj
ll.c
1$
34
M
3M
I*
, 1 1
3 l
?.?
3x
32
Vc--
C07
(tf
ri\
M
/**
**&
/>-/
/ '• (i
/ -^ . (j
Hi
/VJ
/>/
/j y
CO
CO
(ppm)
?y
//c
/&
w
U *
!<>$
/<, c
/^'
/^'
it ^
yc>
'"/;•
TIIHC
(ppm)
J
•J.
3
c/
j
3
5
^
^7
£
'1
}
Sample Gas
Temperature
rn
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion)
bNOx + NHi = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
dN02 = NO - NO
eNH3 - (NDx + NH3)
Notes:
i
i—1
oo
-------
Plant ^ '.'i
Location
Date
*- c' 1 •/^..' /If^-'u
5
/L k.
j
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Time
(24-hr
clock)
11 'Ac
/3A
/:U.
/3>5
/ ~i Y;
/3SS
I* fab
/^
/y/6
y"/;
Sample Gas
Temperature
(•F)
~v
' '-1
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
NOX
(ppm)
AC-
//•
^
c/c
/'/--•
//i
/A
/A
//^
/Xc
y'i.- r>
A-c
//;•
N02
(ppm)
(S
u
u
U
/G.C
IV
M'
«o
v/
iy
.n~
3'.y
7 i"
J- -j
U
C0?
(*f
i". 6
S ^
i' 6
V- '/
/jf./
//>/
/J/
/is-
/3.i
/;u
/J. i
//r
13.1
CO
(«)
CO
(ppm)
^
•-K
^c:
V
('•''
/o
//^
//£>
AXS
/r-
/A
/Vi"
'.' /
*' /i.
y^:;
TUHC
(PPm)
' t
)
i
1
1
< - ,"
* (i :
'i^
/y
j<~'
;/
,M
/ ,:
/J
7
//
Sample Gas
Femperaturt
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion)
bNOx + NH3 = sample path through stainless steel converter
CNOX = sample path through molybdenum converter
ttN02 = NO - NO
eNH3 = (NOx + NH3) - N0x
Notes:
-------
Plant
aL <'/ ^ter-a
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location -\,,j^.>
Date 7- )-%
Tiiire
(24-hr
clock)
//; S'
/'/#•
//K"
//#'
/m"
A''*b
/#T
/#t>
/if
/>A'
/5> r
A, A
/vy
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(°F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
NOx*NH3b
(ppm)
NOXC
(ppm)
N02t)
(ppm)
NH3e
(ppm)
Sample Gas
Temperature
(«F)
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
NOX
(ppm)
/A'
//*"
IK
n>
M-
n*
/9o
/'/<<
/7i"
/n-
/'U
Iti
w
N0?
(ppm)
°?
(t)
M
1H
ll
I'}
4.1
ll
^
tf
Jo
•3//
*/<
fio
n
CO,
(%)
?!}.)
w
A/y
W
n.7
1*1
/f,y.
tf.o
n.Q
/J.I
M
w
M
CO
(%)
en
(ppm)
y/s
]/S"
c;-vt'
Vo
2cS'
J(>S
&
W
3 /$
r^
•)^
m
h
TUHC
(ppm)
ii
/
/o
r\
i*
t-i
$
i
i
•-)
'}
"j
j
i
.1
Sample Gas
Temperatun
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion) "NO?
bNOx + NH3 = sample path through stainless steel converter eNH3 =
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
= NO - NO
Notes:
NH3) -
t
t—'
tn
-------
Plant •_
Location
Date
A f.v/ .•/ -}<
/5To
/>Ys
/^o
/OT
;<£oc
/6*r"
/*/*
////~
/a*
/^'
A>
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(°F)
Heated
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
N0a
(ppm)
Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
NOx+NH3h
(ppm)
/
/
•^
NOXC
(Ppm)
/
/
\
t
n
u ,
N02d
(ppm)
'^H3e
(ppm)
%
;
l, ^
//
/
/\.~T.'
\ t
V~J
A
4
Sample Gas
Temperature
(°F)
f i
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Spec i f y :
Inlet or
Outlet
NO
(ppm)
U'
NOX
(ppm)
/fr'
/^
/061
H*
IX
/ J ^
/?<>
V />'/(
N0?
(ppm)
L
<»
1-J
3-6
M
3.1
V\
H
S"V
i. /•/
co?
(*)
//J
/J,J
I*.JL
IJ.i
K\
11 <>
///
r:-V-^
CO
(%)
/,^ •
CO
(ppm)
/y'5"
//5"
-A.
Ir <'
/OJi;
s^s
6^
JJ S
/•;«:
/7.7,
TtJMC
(ppm)
V
V
/-v;-'
•^
/:;'
L\
0
t.
Sample Gas
Temperaturt
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion) NO? - NO - NO
bNOx + NH-j = sample path through stainless steel converter eNH3 = (NOx + NH3) - N0x
CNO = sample path through molybdenum converter
Notes:
i
i—"
CT>
-------
Plant
CONTINUOUS MONITOR FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Time
(24-hr
clock)
/63f
/&'/<>
/&y$
/£Zo
It^s
/?[)£>
17*?
/7/0
l?/f
/ 7*>
/lit
/?*>
/?rt
Ambient
Temperature
(°F)
WBT
DBT
Barometric
Pressure
(in. Hg)
Instrument
Van
Temperature
(°F)
Heated Sample Line Analysis (Wet)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
(
N0a
(ppm)
'.A<» I
NOx+NH3b
(ppm)
a Q.I
NOXC
(ppm)
r.3
NOgd
(ppm)
- t,<
NH3e
(ppm)
>,vfc
Sample Gas
Temperature
rn
'c3 C*\ i
Cold Sample Line Analysis (Dry)
Sample
Location
Specify:
Inlet or
Outlet
-TV- •"/
NO
(ppm)
/l-''.,~i
NOX
(ppm)
7/O
//-
M*
Mo
HI
/Sc
/3S'
N02
(ppm)
',, -'''
°?
(«)
n li
u
IX
^t
y-is-
w
F.v
M
CO,
(*)
U-
11
u
?,1
£3
CO
(t)
CO
(ppm)
/Vo
c^/O
^^'
;^s
TIJHC
(ppm)
Sample Gas
Temperature
(°F)
aNO = direct sample measurement (no conversion) "NO? = NO - NO
bNOx + NH3 = sample path through stainless steel converter eNH3 = (N
-------
4.2 FIELD DATA SHEETS FOR EPA METHOD 5/8, SASS, HC1, AND VOST TRAINS
4-19
-------
FIELD DATA
Page / of —
Plant
Date
/>jP A«V-
Sample Location ( /»•,,j ,
Sample Type /. > . <~/.£_
Run Number /
Operator \ /, /"%•»' < ••> :
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final
Net Gain
Probe Length and Type 'T' fyf .'.
Nozzel Size 4 I.D. ,5^7
Pilot Coefficient & I.D.
Assumed Moisture , ;> "}
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
oO0 f
>. 3 S-
Molecular Weight, Dry,
Meter Box Number^
Meter Coeffic1ent_
« Factor >, n
-1
Static Pressure, (H?0) -. |p
Filter Number(s)
Inlt.
Velocity
Head
(^PJ,
In. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
UH), in. H?0
Temperature °F
Desired
Actual
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hq
Avg.
of. V-';
f i
7602/5/,81/Rev 1
Cnmrnpnt*;:
-------
Page c/_ of r *
Traverse
Point
Number
f,. in
'•'-/)
e-r?_
N. Clock Time
N^ (24-hr)
N. Clock
Sampling >v
Time, min ^v
^\^_
*'0
,-,-•
.:•<) \?.l |
o,?.? "'
Velocity
Head
(APS).
In. H20
,r> •-
,.'-,-'! '—
. OH-"
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), 1n. HjO
Des i red
• cf)
\
. Tl
Actual
• f'i
• '" ''
, r-l
no''!^
Temperature °F
Stack
3""
2V
5^-0
o., r-7
' ' .'f
Out
"'/
'; ;
"fl
t'l.r
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
,;',
I '
Avg.
V&P~
r ^ *
.
t
.a-:)
I
ro
ro
Run No. ' - /• •• "7
Date
Sampling Location
Coinnents:
-------
FIELD DATA
Page 1 of
F
t
i
<
f
(
1
•r*
i
ro
oo
•lant /%r.c.(y r^f. /'- ;_,f '-
late "7 —
Sample LocationrS/ti.; //n i> ('
Sample Type
r , r -
lun Number /
)perator X5, i.o , /: *-.j f~c-« ^ • > < ^
Ambient Temperature
Barometric
Pressure ra^ \iM
I
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final
Jj^~
>
Net Gain
Probe Length and Type
Nozzel Size ft I.D. /
^Q Pilot Coefficient ft I
- '-^— . .. Assumed Moisture "?.'
-I-
^j ':^^ "'' " "'
".^O
.0. OL-r-Cjjri*: - 1—
r— fV"
Molecular Weiqht, Dry, (Md)
Meter Box Number ^>/(,
Meter Coef f ic ient 3 S '.'-*
Static Pressure, (H20) - , \O
Filter Number(s)
Leak Check:
"t'* -'-A '
Pitolteak1'
Traverse
Point
Number
Initial at |£ " Hg, -C)3, CFM Ci^ *
| -tidal at , Q " H?
Check: A,,^
>v Clock Time
^V (24-hr)
X. Clock
Sampling >^
Time, min >s.
~~& ^L
^T~— — -__
^r^~~— — ~~— ~_
1?> ^-— —^
"JT~~~~- — — __
~35~~ — -—-~__
^oT~~- — —
^5~-~- — ______
t?o~~ — — -— -^
^pr—- -^ -___
. .OS" CFM c-
'7«^3 bi
Wl tC"^
Q$F> -7
/ o, :•--, fi
ffi 1
^ ( .
Silica Gel
" Factor 0> ?\
K
"\ *'•
= (W$
iGU K(Nd)4 '» x )4 =
^
Velocity
Head
' C f •
1n. R?0
O.'^'J"
r> 0-T
f , ^'f-T
,.^45"
• OSGT
.0;,
r-< ,
)C^
- - ^ ' / - ;
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(4H), in. H?0
Des i red
,;'-!'•'{
y '< ' ""
,?. i::
^.- '^
.—.:;"
:;. \ 7
.- 1 •»
Actual
^ 1
t
_v.O
«?.«
:^-'
*> s I
ii.-'> W
i
!
r^2
%Ha
A
H « K(N. 4 (j!?\ { P)
d \Ts/
Temperature °F
Stack
.;c'f
^?i'
• //^
,•^7^
.jl;:-
-~^-.*
cP'c't
t -,' (.,
Probe
3rt
C'.'C'
::/6^
o^-3-
V>':,
•-/o^
*S t
jiL
Impinqer
Orqanic
Module
4D
r>!6
5"
Y( >i
.;^/
^f;
^/X':
'V,.i6
r/i'"?
r t
Gas Meter
In
• ,--
/4(
?'
73
,--/
V .1-
n.
• j
Out
,,—
•"-"
'''(.-.
b?
/,,
^
•S7
c
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hq
, ^—
f^-"
/<-
/5'
>'-{
/'V
/-''
/
t
Avg.
7602/5/81/Rev 1
fomirifn t <;:
-------
Page of
Traverse
Point
Number
\^ Clock Time
\ (24-hr)
\ Clock
Sampling N^
Time, min N.
^^^_
i
"• ,
j
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm), ft 3
Init. '
>•— ~
j«?
V
' : :*V ' '
Velocity
Head
(APS).
in. H20
»
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), in. HpO
Desired
Actual
/
!
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Nodule
i
Oven
Gas Meter
In
•'
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
f: ~ ~
>
1 Avg.
;V&P~
i
i
i
-p.
IV)
-co
Run No.
Date "7/ '-J
Sampling Location .^v,!v\ \-' .A .
\£ /r_
-------
•ICAL DATA
Plant ' >\t3C\< csiT rev^ ^?"f?)*S . 4 ( Sample No%
Sampling Location Run No.
Recovered By _ Recovery Date 71'e.fV Run Date.
Comments
Analyst Responsible
Calculations and Report Reviewed By Report Bate
FILTERS USED CYCLONES
No. _____________ Used Pretared Container
(yes/no) (No.)
3u
IMPIKGER VOLUMES
Initial Final
First (H,0,) JiOO ad, ?i'1O____mi
Second (APS + AgN03) SC& mi
Third (APS + AgN03) _
TOTALS f $CG ml _j5O^___m^ Gain O^L
SILICA GEL WEIGHTS
Initial Final
TOTALS f C.QQ.O & Iffg*? ,"? g Gain
CONDENSATZ
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
Voluae Neat
Volume Extracted
Volume CH2C/2 Extract (3 x
Extracted Ccmdensate: pK Neat
Amount 96" HN03 added
pH Final
TOTAL GAIN
4-25
-------
F1FLD DATA
Paqe
of
Plant A'ocj.' :-»~ f-<'-.f •
Date ~-t-;., ~r "
Samp li- Location ',-•,•, n-> ,. j
Sample Type ~£.U
i
ro
en
Run Number
;
Operator /^/^r , ) ".
Ambient Temperature *> [•",
Jarometric
Pressure •^^'•••^ /
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final
/ ^n->
/yV
Net Gain
Probe Length and
Type '" / s ( r .
Nozzel Size & 1.0.
Pitot Coefficient I I.
Assumed Moisture £.£7?
Molecular Weight
Meter Box Number
, Dry,
D. (; &--C
^-
/A
Leak Check:
Pitot Leak
Traverse
Point
Number
13- cf
/
Initial at /-? " Hg, . .<>1f.FM
Final at *f~" Hg, , QQftCFM
Check: '"'*"""
^v Clock Time
>v Clock
Sampling >v
Time, min >^
~~Q" L^^
^~^— -—-___
^kT~~ — -___
^7? — ~---— ^.
^5o — ^ — - -~-_
~^pr — -—-__
^T — ~ — ~— — _
~—- — — ____^
^— — _____
^— -^_
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm), « 3
I n t * * Ij'i ^\~i j / j •>**}
fi/ *^ 'f v ***
b?H^
U»37-^
1^/7 a /
•K(Nd)4 = * ( * =
i
4
K(Nd)
4 /Tm\
( P)
Temperature °F
Stack
\TJ
•17?
•V?f?
&&
•333
-J^l'i
: ; ;-
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
^
(^3
l/t
fa
(01
lift
Out
tc>
l;?>
65
///^
(4^
w
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
•?A'
3.C
5-^
^ 0
#•''0
Avg.
vSP
7602/5/81/Rey 1
-------
ISOKINETIC CALCULATIONS - USEPA: M/5 BASIS
ROCK OF AGES -NO. 1
RUN NUMBER
DATE OF TEST
OPERATOR
METER VOLUME, CF
METER COEF
BAROMETRIC PRES, HG
DELTA H, IN H20
METER TEMP, DEG F
STACK TEMP, DEG F
CONDENSATE, ML
PERCENT C02
PERCENT 02
PERCENT CO
PERCENT N2
STATIC PRES, IN H20
PI TOT COEF
SQRT DELTA P, IN H20
STACK AREA, SQ FT
NOZZLE DIAM, IN
TEST TIME, MIN
MASS PARTICULATE, G
F-FACTOR, DSCF/MBTU
UOLUME, DSCF
WATER MAPQR, SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE
MOLECULAR WT DRY, LB/LB
MOLECULAR WT WET, LB/LB
STACK PRES, IN HG
STACK VELOCITY, FT/SEC
MASS FLOW, DSCFM
MASS FLOW, ACFM
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
GRAIN LOADING, GR/DSCF
GRAIN LOADING, GR/ACF
EMISSION RATE, LB/HR-STD
EMISSION RATE, LB/MBTU
1-SASS
7-6-83
PWK
952.834
0.373
28.24
2.012
6B. 6
274.3
364.7
7.1
12.2
0
80.7
-0.1
0.73
0 . 234
2.405
1.24
260
0
0
367.246
45.408
0.045
23.624
23.10
28.23
14.34
1 , 337
2,156
76-421
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
1 -M5/8
7-6-83
VB
30.22
1.012
23 . 24
0.703
63.5
235 . 3
54.1
7.1
12.2
0
80.7
-0.1
0.73
0 . 231
2-405
0.387
60
0
28.161
2.546
0.083
23.624
28.66
28.23
15.07
1,316
2,175
105.103
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
1-HCL
7-6-83
UB
16.145
1.012
23.21
0.74
64.3
273
11 .3
7.1
12.2
0
80.7
-0.1
0
0
0
0
30
0
15.165
0 . 532
0-034
23.624
23 . 23
28.20
0.00
0
0
#DIM/0!
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
4-27
-------
FJELO DATA
Page
of
ro
CO
Plant
Date
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final Net Gain
Probe Length and Type_
Nozze] Size & I.D.
Sample Location
Sample Type /
Run Number f
Operator ./'... ,
5513
Pitot Coefficient & I.D.
Assumed Moisture
Molecular Weight, Dry, (Mrf)
Meter Box Number V' ~~. "(L
Ambient Temperature_
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure, (H2
Filter Number(s)
-Q.lG
Silica Gel
H
Leak Check: Initial at if " Hg, ._('?-. CFM'
Final at // " Hg, ,0/3 CFM
Pitot Leak Check: ~\7~
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
Meter Coefficient_
" Factor ''.•"*.'''
K = &'•? ''39
K(Ndj^
(
= K(Nd)4
P)
"f
7602/5/81 /Rev 1
-------
Page Jy of O^_
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, min
Gas Meter
Reading
(»•), « 3
Init.
Velocity
Head
(6PS).
in. H^O
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), in. HaO
Des i red
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Nodule
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
A '
,075
to
4
?/7* .O'-S
q/./
7
9J
Q-
I
INJ
Run No.
Date
Sampling Location
Coinnents:
-------
FIELD DATA
Paqe > of
Plant ~V«rV .
Date
ft^'.-
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final Net Gain
Probe Length and Type_
Nozzel Size i I.D.
Sample Location £
Sample Type Lr-,rVX-> ft.
Run Number t ^-
Operator '-So: >^>f-'- O-''
Pitot Coefficient & I.D. (.,<
Assumed Moisture '//' ''•-.
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure_^t
'(<")
Static Pressure, (H?0) - O./Q
Filter Number(s)
Silica Gel
Leak Check: Initial at
Pitot Leak Check:
Hg,
1| V
H" CFM
CFM
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
Molecular Height, Dry, (Mrf)
Meter Box Number ~,
Meter Coefficient ^',. '?l^
« Factor ?:> ''\1^.
K = l-j/^i
K(Nd?TJ T( j1"
K(Nd
*- •
I
OJ
O
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(?4-hr)
Clock
Gas Meter
Reading
(V. ft 3
Velocity
Head
UP,),
in. i\°
Orifice Pressure
Differential
UH), in. H?0
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Imptnger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hq
Avg.
o
'10
07
11
1
V/O
^4-
•~>
.A
V/2
•0 ")
-^. . a
tl
D6
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5 TO (? ftf
f«> CLh,
f
-------
Page ?. of
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, min
Gas Meter
Reading
Init.
Velocity
Head
UPS).
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), tn. H20
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
IOC)
L
'' VO
3 <.'(:>, '7
., 7
/fo
/
I
CO
/£,£>
f/l
,07
'< 0
/d"?
-S'30 .*
7 I
V 0
^ 0
? r •
, C;
ay /
/DC-
Run No.
-
Ddte
Sampling Location .S
Comnents:
P
-------
Plane
Sampling Location,
Recovered By
CocBenti
SASS ANALYTICAL DATA
ed Fretared Coataiaer
(ye»/no) (Mo.)
CEa VOLUMES
Initial
Final
First (H202)
Second (APS + AgN03)
Third (APS •
m/
O
SSa.Ca HI/
SOS.O ml
TOTALS
a/
SILICA (ZL WEIGHTS
Initial
Fiaal
TOTALS
Gain
COTOENSATZ
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
Volune Meat
Voluae Extracted
Volume CExCij Extract (3 x
Extracted Conc'enaate: pH Neat
Amount 961 EKO^ added
pH Final
TOTAL GAIN
4-32
-------
FIELD DATA
'/ /'
Paqe / of *'
Date
3-
i C2
Sample Location
Sample Type fjdL
Run Number 6r~
Oper a tor
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final
100
Net Gain
Probe Length and Type j> /'/
No7/el Size & 1.0. . 5? "7
//}&
Ambient Temperature 7-ft
Barometric Pressure . •. .
Static Pressure, (HpO) "_
Filter Number(s) jj/f
Pilot Coefficient & I.D.
Assumed Moisture .1) 15
Leak Check: Initial at /£ " Hg,
Final at /#. " Hg,
Pltot Leak Check: ~^~
CFM
Silica Gel
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
Molecular Weight, Dry, (Mrf)_
Meter Box Number,_
Meter Coefficient
" Factor / ,
9*',-5 V
K =
K(Ndf
x
,4 /Tm
I
co
CO
Clock Time
(21-hr)
Gas Meter
Reading
A
Velocity
Head
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(dH), in. H?0
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
•MT-
'7V
(s
. 01
*
'/O
,07
70
10
7602/5/,81/Rev 1
-------
ISOKINETIC CALCULATIONS - USEPA: M./5 BASIS
ROCK OF AGES -NO. 2
RUN NUMBER
DATE OF TEST
OPERATOR
METER VOLUME, CF
METER COEF
BAROMETRIC PRES, HG
DELTA H, IN H20
METER TEMP, DEG F
STACK TEMP, DEG F
CONDENSATE, ML
PERCENT C02
PERCENT 02
PERCENT CO
PERCENT N2
STATIC PRES, IN H20
PITOT COEF
SQRT DELTA P, IN H20
STACK AREA, 3Q FT
NOZZLE DIAM, IN
TEST TIME, MIN
MASS PARTICULATE, G
F-FACTOR, DSCF/MBTU
VOLUME, DSCF
WATER VAPOR, SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE
MOLECULAR NT DRY, LB/LB
MOLECULAR WT WET, LB/LB
STACK PRES, IN HG
STACK VELOCITY, FT/SEC
MASS FLOW, DSCFM
MASS FLOW, ACFM
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
GRAIN LOADING, GR/DSCF
GRAIN LOADING, GR/ACF
EMISSION RATE, LB/HR-STD
EMISSION RATE, LB/MBTU
2-SASS
7-7-83
PWK
360.049
0 . 373
28.6
1.388
107.7
230 . 5
1037.3
7.5
8.8
0
83.7
-0.1
0.73
0.251
2.405
1.24
260
0
881 . 833
51.678
0.055
23.552
28.31
28.53
16.15
1 , 480
2 , 331
65.762
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
2-M5/8
7-7-83
VB
31 .853
1.012
28.6
0.813
30
323
33.2
7.5
8.8
0
83.7
-0.1
0.73
0.248
2.405
0.387
60
0
28.348
1.845
0.060
23.552
28 . 86
28.53
16.38
1,421
2 , 363
100.057
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
2-HCL
7-7-83
VB
14-871
1.012
28.6
0.74
34.5
324 . 7
15.7
7.5
8.8
0
83.7
-0.1
0.73
0 . 245
2,405
0.387
30
0
13.403
0.733
0.052
23.552
28.35
23 . 53
16.11
1,417
2 , 325
32.315
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
4-34
-------
FIELD DATA
Page / of -v
Plant
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final Net Gain
Probe Length and Type_
No//el Size & 1.0.
Sample Location^
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Pilot Coefficient «• I.D.
Assumed Moisture n
Molecular Weight, Dry, (Mrf)
Meter Box Number /) 4'-'jTy
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure, (H20)
Filter Number(s)
Meter Coefficient_
« Factor / /:
Silica Gel
Leak Check: Initial at -AO " Hg, ,C&'-}_ CFM
Final at . /^ " Hg, TBTB'CFM
Pitot Leak Check: S
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
K(Nd)
= K(Nd
P)
i
CO
on
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm). « 3
(M
Velocity
Head
(-JPJ,
In. RO
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(dH), in. H?0
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Avg.
&L
//v
,5/D
00
A
6
•).'
p. /
;? n
--
7602/5/Bl/Rew 1
-------
Page c? of _~i
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, min
Gas Meter
Heading
(vw), ft 3
Init.
Velocity
Head
(APS).
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), in. H?0
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
!.,&?>
3,0
iVM
ft M
/ ' '- '
'761
/,' C
1LQ.WI
al
I
CO
en
(00
Run Ho.
3
Date
Sampling Location
Comnents:
-------
FIELD DATA
Page / of j
P1 ant
Date
Sample Location 5XI/O
Sample Type /iC L-
Run Number .i
Operator
Impinger Voliimes
Initial final
J-H
Net Gain
Probe Length and Type
No/zel Size 1 l.D.
Ambient Temperature "/^
Barometric Pressure
Pilot Coefficient & 1.0.
Assumed Moisture
Static Pressure, (HgO) ~; /<->
Filter Number (s)_A/4___
Silica Gel
Leak Check: Initial at /3 " Hg.//^7g CFM
Final at ,4£_" Hg, ,gyT7 CFM
Pitot Leak Check: ^~^
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
Molecular Weiqht, Dry, (M.)
Meter Box Number fjfit'f ' P
Meter Coefficient
"Factor h
K(N)
P)
I
CO
Clock Time
(?4-hr)
Clock
Traverse
Point
Number
Gas Meter
Reading
Velocity
Head
<*PS>'
in. fl0
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(dH), in. H?0
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinqer
Orqanic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hq
A?
Avg.
"74
1$
'70
fv
ML
7?
10
2^
&L
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
I SDKI NET1C CALCULATIONS - USEPA: M/5 BASIS
ROCK OF AGES - NO. 3
RUN NUMBER
DATE OF TEST
OPERATOR
METER VOLUME, CF
METER COEF
BAROMETRIC PRE3, HG
DELTA H, IN H20
METER TEMP, DEG F
STACK TEMP, DEG F
CONDENSATE, ML
PERCENT CQ2
PERCENT 02
PERCENT CO
PERCENT N2
STATIC PRES, IN H20
PITOT COEF
SORT DELTA P, IN H20
STACK AREA, SQ FT
NOZZLE DIAM, IN
TEST TIME, MIN
MASS PARTICIPATE, G
F-FACTOR, DSCF/MBTU
VOLUME, DSCF
NATER VAPOR, SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE
MOLECULAR WT DRY, LB/LB
MOLECULAR WT WET, LB/LB
STACK PRES, IN HG
STACK VELOCITY, FT/SEC
MASS FLOW, DSCFM
MASS FLOW, ACFM
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PERCENT I SDKINET 1C
GRAIN LOADING, GR/DSCF
GRAIN LOADING, GR/ACF
EMISSION RATE, LB/HR-STD
EMISSION RATE, LB/MBTU
3-M5/8
7-7-83
VB
36 . 383
1.012
28.6
0.376
88.4
276.7
32.7
7.5
8.8
0
83.7
-0.1
0.73
0 . 263
2,405
0 . 387
60
0
0
33.176
1.539
0.044
29 . 552
29.04
28.59
16.73
1 , 580
2,414
103.100
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
3-HCL
7-7-83
VB
13.856
1 .012
28.6
0.647
91
326 . 8
17.2
7.5
8.8
0
83.7
-0.1
0.79
0 . 257
2.405
0 . 387
30
0
0
12.564
0.810
0.061
29.552
28.85
28.59
16.95
1,474
2,446
83.741
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
4-38
-------
-ACU CORPORAT I ON
. ,r-ACUjp ^COR
COMPANY
LOCATION V)ff
PROJECT NO. __>_
RECORDED BY 1
DATE
;%-
RUN
NO.
'">
LOCATION JJD PERSON
/- - r.-.
ij ,- -f J '
POLLUTANT
V of. T
CLOCK TIME
(24-HOUR)
START
IS"£3
•jTi ^
1(^0^
\toy
(M>
FINISH
ELAPSED
TIMF
1 IIIL
(HIM)
FLOW
(UNIT
START
/
11
T)
11
7^
'/-;
RATE
S )
STOP
—
AVERAGE
FLOW
JfllAL-
VOtyME-
-S-AMPtEB-
nikiLic——— - ^
<• UlTrrcrTUr^
T p/ --.;--.• -(("•'• '
-lr>-f
no°F
^(°f
"/ -'> "' (•
i\:f
SAMPLE
I.-D.
^nu
c''
-.?.
r~>
- [I
- -o
COnHENTS/NOTES:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE,
RELATIVE HUMIDITY,
AMBIENT TEMP., ETC.
(V c-t c / -f f f\ r- ('i'.':T-x
)-?°r
:v ?
"71°f
^ri "(^
F.? 'T
i'i
-F»
CO
-------
SECTION 5
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.1 FUEL AND ASH SAMPLE PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSES
5.2 PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS FROM SASS SAMPLES
5.3 PARTICULATE AND SULFUR OXIDES EMISSIONS FROM EPA METHOD 5/8 SAMPLES
5.4 HC1 EMISSIONS FROM HC1 TRAIN SAMPLES
5.5 TRACE ELEMENT AND LEACHABLE ANION ANALYSES
5.6 TOTAL CHROMATOGRAPHABLE ORGANICS (TCO), GRAVIMETRIC ORGANICS (6RAV),
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC/MS), AND INFRARED SPECTRA
(IK) OF TOTAL SAMPLE EXTRACTS
5.7 LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (LC) SEPARATION AND IR SPECTRA OF LC FRACTIONS
5.8 GC/MS ANALYSES OF VOST TRAPS
5.9 h!20 ANALYSES BY GC/ECD
5.10 BIOASSAY RESULTS
5-1
-------
5.1 FUEL AND ASH SAMPLE PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSES
In the following, the sample denoted cyclone ash test 3 is a blind
duplicate of the cyclone ash test 1 sample.
5-3
-------
SOUTHERN DIVISION
401 Canal Street
Wilmington. CA 907*8
213-54O-674O
TWX 810-3*5-6820
ANALYST WILN
LABORATORY CKKTU-ICATH
CURTIS & TOMPKINS, LTD.
ESlAHUSHED I87M
Bulk Oil & Chemical Surveyors. Samplers & Weighers
Analytical & Consulting Chemists
29O Division Slreet
San Francisco, CA 941O3
415-861-1863
Telex: I7IO42
CABLE: ANALYST SFO
FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS
MEMBERS. OFFICIAL CHEMISTS
AND/OR SAMPLERS FOR GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES AND TRADE ORGANIZATIONS
Laboratory No.
Preliminary No.
83nl60
4625
Reported 12/14/83
Sampled
Received 11/22/83
For
ACUREX CORPORATION
Report on
11 samples of Products
Mark
I) 819449, RA Coal, Test 1
2) 819485, RA Pet, Test 2
3) 819478, RA Coal, Pet, Test 2
4) 900209, DM Coal Water Slurry
5) 819498, RA Bottom Ash, Test 1
6) 819498, RA Bottom Ash, Test 2
7) 819476, RA Cyclone Ash, Test 1
8) 819504, RA Cyclone Ash, Test 2
9) 819457, RA Cyclone Ash, Test 3
10) 819475, RA Composite Particulate, Test 1
11) 819475, RA Composite Particulate, Test 2
P.O. RB59186A Rel 7
SEE ATTACHED FOR RESULTS
SAMPLES DISCARDED 3O DAYS AFTER RECEIPT UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUESTED
5-5
-------
ACUREX CORPORATION -2- 12/14/83
83nl60
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS - Dry Basis, %
Ach ..
01 PROXIMATE ANALYSIS - Dry Basis, %
o> Gross Heating Value
a oVi — — _ _ __. -.——_—_
i
71.50
5.30
1.51
1.53
1.58
0.092
0.055
0.098
8.78
12.50
0.20
13,825
34.14
57.08
8.78
2.73
2
73.80
10.30
0.08
0.16
0.20
3 0.07
a o.io
3 0.08
1.66
13.93
0.07
12,870
92.92
5.42
1.66
0.53
3
73.10
5.60
1.27
1.48
1.40
0.63
0.65
0.68
7.02
12.29
0.23
13,670
42.33
50.65
7.02
1.43
4567
83.50 16.70 21.20 30.90
5.30 0.14 0.17 1.40
1.52 0.20 0.35 1.00
1.62
1.66
0.84 0.24 0.18 4.50
0.90
0.95
4.41 81.59 0.54 51.06
4.09 1.08 77.48 10.94
0.20 0.05 0.08 0.20
15,020 600 1,600 4,940
30.69
64.90
4.41 81.59 0.54 51.06
44.07 0.15 0.14 8.73
8 9 10 11
33.60 30.90 14.50 21.10
0.92 1.07 1.54 1.10
1.20 1.06 1.00 0.48
2.90 4.60
51.04 48.39 61.40 42.71
10.08 13.79 21.56 34.61
0.26 0.19
5,340 4,700
51.04 48.39 61.40 42.71
3.99 8.97
analyses for sample 1 were 0.92, 0.95, and 0.98 for the three tests, respectively (authors)
-------
5.2 PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS FROM SASS SAMPLES
5-7
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample
Requested By:
v ZL . t*Sc.~fcs/C*. t/
I.D. M'tmhor
Analytical Method:
-/
Of
Lab I.D. Number
Component
Analytical Result
Unit
7
z<
O.
Anal/sis
5-9 Dite
Form EED- -0£?
-------
Plant
Date
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
OP A
b 13.6
vm\ /p + 4H \
+ 0?-OV2.)\
13.6 )
+ 460 /
grams)
condition (scf)
r vapor
f*-5"- ^^
K^) + ( )
ftl-'ll-t
dry
+ (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
+ (sro.n + x 0.28)
wet
Hg)
(-«»
/O fy 7 uA j.
i **i t . A«Tn T "T*^"' if "
pb
Vm std
Vlc
vw std
wo
Md
M
p
*M
,ft,«t
1UH.1
,,,o,
—
,,.„
,,.
„.«
5-10
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stark v^lO<~ity (fps)
/T.avg + 460
85 19 fC ) f/4P }
"• iy 1V lv s avg' / P M
<\y S S
__ 7 /(jny-3) + 460
Ps /!Q ^ "1*1 ^/^^7-^n ^ /
I r *7 G n t\ t *~t ~ \
^j ^y,£$) (i?T.IU)
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460)(VW std + Vm std)
0 Vs Ps Nd2
17.33 ( + 460)(( ) + ( ))
( )( )( )( )*
Area of stack (ft2) ir= 3.1416
?rr2-r-144, 7r()oV")2-t-144
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - Bwo)Vs.va A. / 528 \ / Ps \
wo avg j j j av + ^gQ i 1 29 92 )
5 / \ /
60 (1 H H )/ 528 \ /( }\
( + 460 / \(29.92)/
\ / \
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
ic /no M (grams) -tc ^op (Q.\/5Q
Vm . , (cjfcyL^iW
t
Emission rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (QJ C. , 0.00857 ( )( )
J J(std)
Ts
y
s(avg)
0
Nd
H
As
^^
^
f
Le
S(std)
ED
H
^ ^
W-1V
auo
,.«o
/4?« T ^ \
2 ^v i ^ c™" "
.,,^
\ i S I /
/*\ f\t ^ -\Sc
' ^
5-11
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of.
Sample Dale
x /"* /-
*/ /bcz
Requested By:
r:
-------
Plant
Date
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
of Afe.gs ____ Performed by \^faj
Sample Location
Test No. /Type _ A-
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
'Ifao. oVl
(I \\ /h \ + U-Ta'2 ) \
\ ) \ 1 V.(,^) + ( )
**f.8S3
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
(1.5" x 0.44) + (%•% x 0.32) + (£2.1 + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(i-B ) + 18(8 ), (ms2)(i-.*$D + is(prr)
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
P,t,ck (in. H.,0) (-0., )
PiOLaL-f^ £- /__ \ ,
H 1 ^ ft * ^ o * w O / T*3 A
pb
Vm std
Vlc
vw std
wn
M
^^ ^^ ^v^^
/VOGa,
«s
0
Kc
af..o
«,.,»
/«ri
»"*
^.os-s-
=!•».£•«
*„
•^sr.rif
5-13
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fps]
/T$avg + 460
J"p"~
S S
85.49
460
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
s(avg)
e
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460)(VW std
std)
0 V
Nd
17.33 ( + 460) (( ) + ( ))
Area of stack (ft2) »r= 3.1416
jrr2 -r- ] 44 , n (j^£i2H-l 44
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - B,.,jVsav/n Ac / 528 \ / Ps \
/ \ /
wo; avg
A.'S'S!
60
528
]
460 \( 29.92)
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15.432
15.432
Vm
std
(std)
Emission rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (QJ C. , 0.00857 ( )(
'S' S
(std)
I S
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-14
-------
5.3 PARTICIPATE AND SULFUR OXIDES EMISSIONS FROM EPA METHOD 5/8 SAMPLES
5-15
-------
Sample of:.
Sample Date:_
Requested By:
I.D. Number: O<^ / /
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
rv e.N,
fa+.tSf
Analytical Method:
Date of Analysis'—
Lab I.D. Number
Component
Analytical Result
Unit
0.
Analysis By
5-17 Date
Form EED--082 V81
-------
Sample ol
Sample
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
vr
0
" 7f " * ^
Requested By:
I.D. Number:
Analytical Method:
Date of Analysis:
Analysts By.
5-18 D»te-
FormEED--06?
-------
P ] ant R
Date ...X-
Sample Location
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
re Performed by TV
Test No. /Type ___ /._.- ._/*[_
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
( ll* )
/ \3& • ^it— / \ / V1** * ' ^ * / \
17 fid ( 1 1 13.61
Y/.o/z.) y\( ki.s") + 460 y
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
V j.,1 tt-SVt.)
¥ i./ c f- H ^ „ '
V.. ..j-j + V_ ^^^ ^.£^b) + bZ.llai)
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
(7J x 0.44) + (/2.2Lx 0.32) + (Jo.l + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-B J + 18(B,_), {?f.feZ*)(l-.oirj) + 18(.o>?)
wo wo • — -• •'
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
Pstack (in' H20) (-Q.I )
r ^ • 1 "3 C ^ \ o • o T y "i *3 ft
pb
Vm std
»lc
vw std
8
wn
Md
"s
p
^^ .24-
«.,.,
rn.i
a.«.
*^
V.K +
a*.b(*
it, 13
5-19
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
velocity (fps) ,
"^ _ 460
i \./ S S \i
s(avg)
460
•»1 )('23f ) /•'
>/
Total sample time (minutes) 0
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460)(Vw std + Vm std)
Q Vs Ps N^2
17.33 ( + 460)(( ) + ( ))
Area of stack (ft2) ir= 3.1416
^r2 -r- 1 44 , n- (/Q.^")2-^-1 44
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (] - Bwo)Vsavg As / ^28+ \ I ?* \
is avg + I ^ . I
+ 460 \(29.92)
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15.432 Vgrams), 15.432
Vmstd
f in 1 ii uliil ..... ifhi
^ P
(std)
o.
5-20
7602/5/81/,gev 1
-------
pi
Date
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Performed by /^.f;
Sample Location 5/^p
Test No=/Type ^j-
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
/('*"\/C»to)+ fc«>\
17 , . j \ { 13.6 j
\ (y.O'2.) / \ ("70 ) + 460 /
\ / \ '
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
V,., r¥A ('-*v.r)
Vw std + Vm std ('^*£ + &LS1$
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
(l.S^ x 0.44) + (S-.gr x 0.32) + (#3.1 + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-B ) + 18(B ), (n &$ ( 1 - o,obo) + 18(°} {~°-1 }
h 1^ fi » Uff'WO; T n-5 i
pb
Vm std
Vlc
vw std
R
wn
"d
m
C
I
«.W
3-1. -2.
,.»«-
^
«.««.
•*% P -J '
5-21
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
1
Temperature stack gas,
Stack velocity (fp*)
P S cl
85 49 f.*i^/ ) f * 9 ^&"
average (°F)
/V$avg + 460
vq / P M
y N/ S S
/(J21_) + 460
J (*.r> ) U^jffc)
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460)(Vw std
0 Vs Ps
17.33 ( + 460)((
( inches)
+ Vm std)
) + ( ))
( )( )( )( )<*
Area of stack (ft2) JT =
Stack gas volume at sta
60 <] -BWO)VsavgAs f
60 (1 - )( )( )/
I
Particulate matter cone
15.432 V9ramS),
Vmstd
3.1416
-f-144
ndard conditions (dscfm)
528 \ / Ps \
528 \ /D\
+ 460 / U29.9Z)/
entration, dry (gr/dscf)
15 /i 30 (&O£b>'s)2
( ~J S? C»^^/c^ 1
O.PfWt7 (Q.) -C Q
5 b(std)
nnnc7 ( u . \
^s
s(avg)
«
Nd
„
AS
«s
S(std)
5cX -
" E
-v
5a-»
,,3,
to
».S»1
/o 0.0^-7
a.^
.«,
O-O^o^
^*/^. 9 ?-
«.^-
5-22
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
j?f*_K og ArC^EC _______ Performed by
Date ___ -) --)-;<•,•?
Sample Location
Test N
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
(Vl<.)\
/ r" "•** **7 \ / v**5 ^ ) \
17 61 ( II l3'6 )
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
Vw std , (^£11
V ^r \i I / ^~"7^fl "4" f *2 ? J^Y
1*1 c T H mc^"^ / *^J -1 V \ -^ -^ ' ^^^
W 3 UU III b LU '
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
(-7.5" x 0.44) + (S-g x 0.32) + (B3.1+ x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-B,J + 18(B..J, (*f.ssfe(l-0.DV-t + 18(o OH-^
wo wo •'— —
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
P-taclc (in' ^ e°^ }
p -f- ,m ., \J^.^, ,,,._. .. _ .,,. ( °£ t»u) "f" ...-•—.-»—.
^
Vm std
»lc
vw std
wn
FA-V^*
M
p
c
>29*. GO
33. Ol*
«.i
i.s-s?
*^
2*1. OH-
X o ' .S 1
5-23
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fps)
/T avg + 460
'"W"
460
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
C
0
17.33 (Ts + 460)(VW std
std
17.33
Vs Ps
+ 460) (( )
Nd
))
Area of stack (ft2) *= 3.1416
n ( /P. r)2-H 44
nr2 -:- 1 44 ,
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - BU(n)Vsai/n ^ / 528 \ / Ps \
. avg + 460 ) I 29.92
/ \ /
wo' avg
60 (1 - )( )( )/
528
-\ ((=±
460 / U29.92),
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
!5.432 Mp(9rams), 15.432 (
Vm
std
itn nf pnrtjriilitn mnttrr flh/h
s(avg)
0
'(std)
./ oo
5-24
7602/5/8T/Rev
-------
5.4 HC1 EMISSIONS FROM HC1 TRAIN SAMPLES
5-25
-------
/"S ACUREX
'O Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex
Attention: Larry Water!and
October 6, 1983
Acurex ID#: 8309-035
Customer POI: 307736.62
Subject: Vermont Chloride Determinations; received 7/7/83
The above samples were analyzed for chloride by argentometric titration.
Sample #
^-' ^ 319474
/•-i- 819447
Volume, ml
405
143
Total Chloride, mg/L
310
13
Total Chloride, mg
130
2
Prepared by: .
VK ^/^cVO-Approved by:
Stephefn Guinnane
Analyst
Greg Nt^bll
Oper^nons Manager
SG/GN/ats
5-27
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
P1ant_
Date
Performed by
Sample Location_
Test No./Type
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
"•«&)(>*+&}
W\Tm+460/
r 6i l~ )((— + '"TO- )
V ) \( r. ) + 460 /
\ / \ '
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
vw std . ££ir)
Vw -td + Vm -td (---) + ('-'^
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N?+ % CO x 0.28)
( x 0.44) + ( ,. . x 0.32) + ( ' + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
MdO-B ) + 18(B ), (,-;., l.^(l-r/. it) + 18(r.r;^
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
p , Pst,Ck "»- H2<" , . (_>
fb 13.6 ' { -I 13.6
pb
w
m std
Vlc
vw std
u/n
Md
--•. k: . -
Ms
Ps
S
. "' -
. — ( ^ ~"~
• * -^
r ~" •"'
j — r~ ' ~ ^__
< '"' • '-- i r""
~")
.-<";. ^,,'
•'/ '> ""' f~
A - * ^ ..
5-28
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fps)
7
/T avg + 460
s
s s
s(avg)
1.49
™~~
Total sample time (minutes)
e
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460)(VW std
std)
e vs PS Nd
17.33 ( + 460) (( ) + ( ))
XI
A'
Area of stack (ft2) »» 3.1416
,rr2 -=- 1 44 , n ( >.-')2-r-l 44
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
W^'Bwo^avgS L 52& ^ / Ps \
60
<_><_>/-
\ /(_»
+ 460 / 1(29.92)j
528
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15.432 Mp(9rams> 15.432 ( }
'(std)
Emission rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (QJ C. , 0.00857 ( )(
's' s
(std)
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-29
-------
P1ant_
Date
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
_. i_^ Performed by .. ^..
Sample Location_
Test No./Type
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
A - A A ) + (• •) \
17.64 I ( . )L _ ,j +. 4gQ J
\ . - / \ '
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
Vw std , (— — <
v + v ' " + r : )
w std m std „ • v- — -'
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
( ,. x 0.44) + ( •; . x 0.32) + (?..+ x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-Buo) + 18(B ), (<<.^L)(1-,cry) + IStcj--^
WO WO — — — .- ,mr
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg) -
P . . (in. H00) (-'••>)
n stack v 2 / , v +
'b 13.6 ' l^^^T 13.6
pb
m std
»'c
vw std
wn
Md '
.'- ; f >'•'-. A •'
Ms
P
s
•
-" . :• "• ;'
^.r^
:• •-;'. •' .-,-—
s ••.r-'
5-30
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fps)
85.49 (Cp)
85.49 (
.avg + 460
's(avg)
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%}
17.33 (T + 460) (Vu std + Vm std)
s w m
XI
17.33 ( + 460) (_( ) + ( ))
( )( )( )( 2
Area of stack (ft*) »= 3.1416
?rr2 H-144, fr ( ' )2H-144
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 -
60
528
Ps
avg »
528
+460/ \(29.92)
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15.432 Vgrams), 15.432
Vm
std
T
T
'(std)
Emission rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (QJ Ce , 0.00857 (_ )(
'(std)
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-31
-------
P1ant_
Date
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
- . . - . -._.•.-•: . Performed by -, .
Sample Location_
Test No./Type
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
17-64
17.64
460
'm std
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
VI,
"w std
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
M (l,*i~ '
vw std . ^_i_.
_ __
w std m std
wo
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
( x 0.44) + (.-. x 0.32) + (•. .,* x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-Bwo) + 18(BWO), (^^rid
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
„ ^ stack ^in' 2 /
T3.6
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-32
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fps)
85.49 (Cp) (^Ps ayg)
85.49 (
.avg + 460
/(. .*.?) + 460
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
s(avg)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (T + 460)(V std + Vm std)
j W Fn
V VS fs N
-------
5.5 TRACE ELEMENT AND LEACHABLE ANION ANALYSES
In the following, the botton ash test 3 sample is a blind duplicate of
the bottom ash test 2 sample and the cyclone ash test 3 sample is a blind
audit sample consisting of NBS 1633a flyash.
5-35
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Reply to
Instrument Analysis Division Phone: 303-278-9521
490 Orchard Street
Golden, CO 80401 January 3, 1983
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountian View, CA 94042
RE: IAD #97-N182-116-28
Subcontract #SW59159A
Release #11
Analytical Report
Twenty-eight samples were received for analysis on November 30, 1983.
These samples were assigned our IAD identification #97-N182-116-28.
Trace element determinations using Spark Source Mass Spectrometry per
EPA level 1 protocol will be reported in separate reports upon completion
of analysis.
Arsenic and Antimony were determined on four of the samples using hy-
dride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mercury was deter-
mined on all twenty-eight samples us.ing flameless cold vapor atomic absorp-
tion spectrophotometry.
The results of these determinations are presented in Table No. I and
No. I! and are reported in parts per million (ppm) by weight on an "as
received" basis.
5-37
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, IL 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
OVER 40 BRANCH LABORATORIES STRATEGICALLY LOCATED IN PRINCIPAL COAL MINING AREAS,
TIDEWATER AND GREAT LAKES PORTS, AND RIVER LOADING FACILITIES
-------
Analytical Report
IAD #97-N182-116-28
Page 2
Sample ID
819454 RA Imp 2 and 3, Test 1
819455 RA Imp 2 and 3,
Blank, Test 1
819467 RA Imp 2 and 3, Test 2
319469 RA Imp 2 and 3,
Blank, Test 2
Table No. I
(ppm by Weight)
Arsenic (As)
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
Antimony (Sb)
0.003
Test 1
819475 RA Filter, Test 2
819458 RA Filter Blank
819456 RA 10y + 3y, Test 1
819492 RA lOu + 3w, Test 2
819459 RA XAD-2, Test 1
819465 RA XAO-2, Test 2
819461 RA XAD-2, Blank
819452 RA Imp 1, Test 1
819466 RA Imp 1, Test 2
819448 RA Imp 1, Blank
819449 RA Coal, Test 1
819485 RA PET, Test 2
819478 RA Coal/PET, Test 2
819488 RA Bottom Ash, Test 1
819495 RA Bottom Ash Leachate, Test 1
819498 RA Bottom Ash, Test 2
819496 RA Bottom Ash Leachate, Test 2
819493 RA Bottom Ash, Test 3
819476 RA Cyclone Ash, Test 1
819482 RA Cyclone Ash Leachate, Test 1
819504 RA Cyclone Ash, Test 2
819486 RA Cyclone Ash Leachate, Test 2
819464 RA Cyclone Ash, Test 3
819454 RA Imp 2 and 3, Test 1
819455 RA Imp 2 and 3 Blank, Test 1
819467 RA Imp 2 and 3, Test 2
819469 RA Imp 2 and 3 Blank, Test 2
Mercury (Hg)
0.09
0.11
0.03
5.0
6.0
0.23
0.
0.
.24
.03
0.002
0.010
-------
Analytical Report
#97-N182-116-28
Page 3
If you have any questions concerning these results, please call.
Harold A. Connell
Assistant Laboratory Manager
Robert L. Taylor,"Ph.D/,Manager
Instrumental Analysis Envision
HAC/gh
5-39
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
p-466
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
_ . kl Subcontract #SW59159A
P.O. No, Release #11
Sample No.: 819449 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA coal, test 1 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium 2
Thorium 5
Bismuth
Lead 3
Thallium
Mercury MR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
CONC.
0.2
0.7
0.3
1
7
3
18
25
100
0.5
1
<1
0.5
STO
1
Rhodium
*Heterogeneous
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gal lium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
27
*12
31
10
110
5
21
*130
11
1
16
53
14
2
8
MC
8
120
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
40
MC
35
MC
MC
270
590
100
MC
MC
MC
MC
-830
NR
NR
NR
30
9
74
NR
STO — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected< 0.2 ppm
MC - Major Component >1QOO ppm
INT — Interference
Approved:' \i—^'L-4.
5-40 -2
A
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
2
k
Subcontract #SW59159A
P.O. No.: Re1ease #11
Sample No.: ^i^8.8^ agh SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
test 1 ' CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium 9
Thorium 14
Bismuth
Lead 9
Thallium 1
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten l
Tantalum 0.9
Hafnium 3
Lutetium 0.3
Ytterbium 1
Thulium 0.2
Erbium 2
Holmium 2
Dysprosium 3
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
CONC.
0.8
3
2
7
14
7
22
30
350
2
2
£0.2
4
0.8
STD
0.4
0.5
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
6
9
34
11
210
8
4
13
4
1
10
11
18
160
22
MC
13
50
Date: January
4, 1984
Analyst: g. Meagher
IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
44
MC
30
MC
MC
98
320
740
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
31
22
120
NR
STD - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected < Q.l ppm
MC - Major Component >1QOO
INT — Interference
5- q.jApproved:
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
SSTRL MENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P. O. No.: Release #11
Sample No.: 819495 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPH 1C ANALYSIS
RA bottom ash
leachate, test 1
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
No.: 97-N182-116-28
CONCENTRATION IN
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rheni urn
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
CONC. ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
£0.004 Samarium
Neodymi urn
NR Praseodymium
Cerium 0.001
Lanthanum
Barium 0.06
Ces i urn
Iodine 0.002
Tellurium
Antimony < 0.004
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmium
Silver <0.002
Palladium
Rhodi urn
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
0
£0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1°
0
0
0
.1
.001
.003
.001
.6
.008
.03
.1
.03
.002
.01
.03
.01
.01
.001
.06
.002
.02
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
0.02
0.3
£0.001
MC
MC
0.5
MC
0.1
4
0.5
4
MC
-4
NR
NR
NR
0.2
3
NR
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected< 0.001
MC — Major Component >10 pg/mL
INT — Interference
Approved:
_4A2p
J
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555 Date: February 3, 1984
Mountain View, CA 94039
Analyst: G. Meagher
p. O. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819476 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
RA cylcone ash,
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
CONC.
2
2
0.4
14
2
NR
0.5
0.4
0.3
<0.1
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.7
1
STD - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.1 ppm
1000 ppm
CONC.
0.2
0.9
0.4
3
3
1
4
6
130
0.4
3
0.4
6
I
STD
0.4
0.5
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
s~-
Approved: '/V^
5-43
CONC.
8
4
8
5
90
2
49
170
52
4
19
37
34
79
6
MC
11
51
~-x
j j
l,v\^uJT
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To:
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P.O. No.: Release #11 Project #7601
Sample No.: 819482 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC
RA cyclone ash, 1 eachateCONCENTRAT|ON |N yg/ml
Test 1
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: Q. Meagher
ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
CONC.
0.69
0.31
0.005
0.27
0.21
NR
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.27
0.04
0.30
0.40
0.63
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
CONC.
0.06
0.23
0.09
0.76
0.72
0.34
0.85
1.2
2.1
0.05
0.008
0.01
0.15
0.02
STO
0.17
0.008
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
0.22
0.19
0.95
1.2
MC
0.63
0.51
0.80
4.1
0.22
6.5
MC
MC
4.0
7.4
MC
MC
3.7
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i urn
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
7.4
MC
0.85
MC
MC
6.6
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
1.8
0.32
>4.1
NR
STD — Internal Standard ^, — ^
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component
0.001 pg/ml
>10 yg/ml
Approved: i \^ e
5-44 °~
*•— , /-— -.
r-^'-o
k~^
INT — Interference
? '
e
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-952]
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
p. 0. No.: Subcontract #SW59159A
. .. Release #11
Sample No.: Q19456 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA 10u + 3p, test 1 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: G< Meagher
IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
CONC.
9
20
6
460
40
NR
8
2
2
0.4
3
0.8
4
6
Dysprosium 9
STO — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi um
Praseodymi um
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi um
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi um
0.2 ppm
>1000 ppm
CONC.
2
6
3
17
28
24
150
87
MC
11
29
3
150
43
STD
14
35
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
/o
Approved: \i<-— "
5-45
CONC.
84
48
240
82
MC
72
220
MC
MC
56
830
MC
722
830
64
MC
MC
MC
"< ^
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
940
MC
73
MC
MC
850
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
=880
NR
NR
NR
MC
31
>530
NR
INT — Interference
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue „«,.„.
P.O. Box 7555 Date: February 3, 1984
Mountain View, CA 94039
Analyst.- G. Meagher
P. O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A Release 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819463 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
RA filter + In, test 1
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbi urn
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
CONC.
62
25
20
600
31
NR
12
2
1
0.3
2
0.4
1
2
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymium
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
CONC.
1
4
3
12
32
14
61
61
940
4
6
2
51
30
STD
77
12
Dysprosium 3
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected < 0. 1 ppm
MC - Major Component >1000 ppm
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
O
Approved: -j^-,-,.'
5-46
CONC.
65
14
68
58
420
15
250
400
550
39
350
860
440
210
100
MC
67
150
/ ^
y^""^
j~} \ rt
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
~~6 -""? (/
CONC.
66
MC
10
MC
MC
470
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
MC
29
>370
NR
-"\
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P. 0. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819459 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA XAD-2
test ! ' CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Fphmarv 3 1984
Date: February J, iys4
Analyst: Q. Meagher
IA& No,97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 0.3
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum *o.l
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
STD - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
CONC. ELEMENT CONC.
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
0.8 Selenium
0.2 Arsenic
0.07 Germanium
0.05 Gallium
Zinc
0.07 Copper
STD Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
0,4
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.07
<0.07
0.1
2
0.6
2
0.1
12
0.4
1
*Probable Contamination from sample
prep
0.001 pg/mL
100 ug/mL
^ ;
Approved: 0 — £
5-47
"P i
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i urn
Lithium
Hydrogen
: -£ ,3
CONC.
0-1
5
^0.04
10
8
13
20
2
in
3
27
40
-22
NR
NR
NR
0.07
1
NR
^
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
p. O. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819461 spARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA XAD-2, blank
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: 6. Meagher
IA° No..- 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
CONC. ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
0.3 Samarium
Neodymi urn
NR Praseodymium
Cerium
*0.1 Lanthanum
Barium 0.3
Cesium
Iodine 0.05
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmium <0.02
Silver
Palladium
Hoi mi urn Rhodium
*Probable contamination
Dysprosium preparation.
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected < 0.01 ppm
MC — Major Component > JQQ ppm
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
from sample
Approved: ^Vl a'
5-48 •;
CONC.
0.1
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.04
<0.01
<0.01
0,1
0.8
0.3
1
<0.02
1
0.1
0.3
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
0.02
0.3
<0.01
42
3
6
4
0.6
14
0.5
11
28
-13
NR
NR
NR
0.04
0.3
NR
Jc^v
i
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
p. O. No.: Release #11
Sample No.: 819452 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA Imp 1, test 1 CONCENTRATION IN ug/mL
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: G< Meagher
IAD No, 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 0.6
Thallium 0.07
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.3
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin 0.3
Indium STD
Cadmium 0.05
Silver 0.08
Palladium
Rhodium
*Heterogeneous
0.006 pg/mL
10 pg/mL
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
Approved: '\Y-^\±
5-49
CONC.
*0.02
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.1
<0.004
0.06
2
0.5
0.2
0.01
1
0.04
0.2
"5 r
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
""-*-'* ^ ••
CONC.
0.006
0.2
0.004
1
*1
0.1
4
0.3
6
0.2
4
1
= 0.3
NR
NR
NR
0.005
0.05
NR
A
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
TO:
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P. O. No.: Release #11
Sample No.: 81944U SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC
RA Imp 1 blank CONCENTRATION IN
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
ANALYSIS IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi um
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
AAC — Major Component >
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi um
Praseodymi um
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.03
Cesium
Iodine 0.005
Tellurium
Antimony <0.01
Tin 0.2
Indium STD
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.002 ug/mL
10 jig/mL
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri um
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
f^>
Approved: V- — t
5-50
CONC.
0.1
0.02
0.006
0.03
0.006
0.002
0.007
0.05
0.004
0.01
0.07
0.7
0.01
0.03
>
-? *~
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
^ ~^-^ - »_"T^'
CONC.
<0.001
0.03
0.001
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.8
-0.2
NR
NR
NR
0.004
NR
fe-i^x&Lv
.'\
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9500
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A Release 11 Project 7601
Sample No.:819478 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA coal/PET, test 2 CONCENTRATE IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium 2
Thorium 4
Bismuth 2
Lead 28
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum 3
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbi um
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi um
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi um
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
CONC.
1
4
2
4
6
41
0.9
0.9
24
0.9
STD
2
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
17
2
8
4
24
2
10
4
3
<0.1
5
10
27
340
9
MC
17
43
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi um
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i um
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
11
MC
9
MC
MC
110
MC
170
MC
MC
MC
MC
-71
NR
NR
NR
14
0.8
5
NR
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected < 0. 1 ppm
MC - Major Component >1000 ppm
INT — Interference
Approved: '^J
5-51
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst.- G. Meagher
P. O. No.: Subcontract No. SW59159A Release 11 Project 7601
Sample No.:
RA PET, test
SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth 0.5
Lead 32
Thallium 0.3
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten 0.8
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR — Not Reported
Al! elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.1 ppm
1000 ppm
CONC. ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
<0.1 Rubidium
Bromine
17 Selenium
Arsenic
<0.1 Germanium
Gallium
22 Zinc
Copper
STD Nickel
2 Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
..-'" — ~
Approved: y^
5-52
CONC. ELEMENT
Vanadium
8 Titanium
Scandium
0.2 Calcium
<0.1 Potassium
<0.1 Chlorine
<0.1 Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
<0-1 Aluminum
<0-1 Magnesium
3 Sodium
6 Fluorine
38 Oxygen
290 Nitrogen
13 Carbon
22 Boron
4 Beryl 1 i urn
11 Lithium
Hydrogen
\
' ' •• t — T~ '~"i'^ - — \
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
p. o. No.: Release #11
Sample No.: 819498 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA bottom ash,
test 2 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: G< Meagher
IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
-Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
CONC.
22
31
52
4
NR
4
5
5
0.9
7
1
4
5
Dysprosium Q
STD - Internal Standard
NR — Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC - Major Component >
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Ceri urn
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.1 ppm
1000 ppm
CONC.
3
8
4
15
32
10
42
66
MC
5
0.7
0.3
15
2
STD
4
0.6
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
^
Approved: '^"^j
5-53
CONC.
16
15
92
62
510
25
5
17
7
4
63
23
48
150
110
MC
72
220
— >
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodi urn
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i urn
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
24
MC
41
MC
MC
36
270
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
= 250
NR
NR
NR
130
24
>400
NR
INT — Interference
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60143 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
Date:
January 4, 1984
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P. O. No.= Release #11
Sample No.: 819496 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
RA bottom ash
leachate, test 2 CONCENTRATION IN pg/mL
Analyst: Q. Meagher
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 0.009
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten 0.02
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
tNT — Interference
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.3
Cesium
Iodine 0.01
Tellurium
Antimony 0.2
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmium 0.004
Silver £0.004
Palladium
Rhodium
0.002 pg/mL
10 yg/mL
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
Approved: { \^,
5-54 ^'
CONC.
0.5
0.003
0.01
0.009
3
0.02
0.08
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.02
£0.003
0.6
0.005
0.06
•\
•^ —
? .'-;
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i urn
Lithium
Hydrogen
/ - f*~~Y~-
CONC.
0.05
0.2
£0.002
MC
MC
3
MC
0.3
5
MC
0.9
MC
~7
NR
NR
NR
0.4
0.07
NR
*~>^S
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
ztk
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
p. O. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819504 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-N182-116-28
RA cyclone ash,
test 2 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
CONC.
12
11
1
70
14
NR
2
1
<0.7
0.2
1
0.4
2
3
Dysprosium 5
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.1 ppm
1000 ppm
CONC.
0.6
2
0.8
4
15
7
22
35
360
2
8
0.4
26
5
STD
8
1
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
Approved: (\z-r
5-55 V
CONC.
20
9
19
11
170
5
77
130
70
8
22
88
45
39
10
MC
27
68
-? r
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
45
MC
8
MC
MC
250
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
=380
NR
NR
NR
840
10
380
NR
INT — Interference
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
TO: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountian View, CA 94039
P. O. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819486 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA cyclone ash leachate,
test 2 CONCENTRATION IN Ug/ml
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meaoher
IA° No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
CONC.
0.05
0.01
0.1
0.09
NR
<0.003
0.005
0.004
0.002
0.03
0.002
0.008
0.01
Dysprosium 0.02
STD - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
0.001 ua/mL
10 ug/mL
CONC.
0.007
0.03
0.01
0.06
0.2
0.08
0.2
0.3
0.05
0.02
0.001
0.001
0.05
0.003
STD
0.1
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
0.02
0.005
0.01
0.5
4
0.1
0.08
0.2
0.2
0.07
5
12
6
0.8
1
MC
MC
1
Approved: ^^ J^J^T"
5-56 ' r-? •—
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
" i V" ' j / '•
CONC.
0.3
MC
0.1
MC
MC
0.7
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
0.2
0.07
>2
NR
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To:
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P.O. No.: Release #11
Sample No.: 819492 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA lOvt + 3p, test 2 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: January 4, 1984
Analyst: Q> Meagher
IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
CONC.
9
8
20
890
42
NR
19
4
3
1
10
0.8
4
6
9
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi um
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi um
CONC.
2
8
3
20
48
22
75
90
830
4
12
6
680
35
STD
67
36
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
140
29
56
64
690
22
220
680
810
44
290
MC
650
MC
74
MC
200
MC
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi um
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i um
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
320
MC
50
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
= 340
NR
NR
NR
MC
43
>540
NR
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported _
All elements not detected < u • <• PPm
MC - Major Component >1000 ppm
INT — Interference
Approved: \ \~-TJ ''(,_/u^
5-57 ^ ^ 'r
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P. O. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819475 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPH 1C ANALYSIS
RA Filter,
test 2 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
"AD No.:97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
CONC.
78
2
86
MC
96
NR
33
4
<0.2
±0-3
£0.5
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
"Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
CONC.
0.2
1
0.3
2
4
1
3
3
53
16
7
8
MC
250
STD
700
19
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
170
2
6
7
71
96
240
300
MC
330
MC
MC
MC
MC
240
MC
MC
MC
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
170
110
13
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
-310
MR
NR
NR
MC
25
>312
MR
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
0.1 ppm
500 ppm
Approved: \
5-58
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P. O. No.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project 7601
J°" RA9XAO-2 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
test 2 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IAD No.:97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 0.2
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum *0.2
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.4
Cesium 0.2
Iodine 0.09
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
Dysprosium 'Probable. contamination
J preparation.
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All element* not detected < O.O^Ppm
AAC - Major Component > 100 ppm 5_
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
from sample
O
Approved: ^^—\i
CONC.
2
10.04
0.08
<0.01
0.4
0.5
0.03
0.02
0.06
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.1
6
0.1
1
n
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
0.03
1
<0.01
2
2
49
21
7
33
2
4
6
=91
NR
NR
NR
0.1
-
0-1
NR
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 50148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountian View, CA 94039
P. O. No.: Subcontract
Sample No.: 819466
RA Imp 1, test 2
SW59159A Release 11 Project 7601
SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
CONCENTRATION IN
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IAD No.: 97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
INT — Interference
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.03
Cesium 0.007
Iodine *0.2
Tellurium 0.003
Antimony 0.007
Tin 0.01
Indium STD
Cadmium
Silver 0.02
Palladium
Rhodi urn
*Heterogeneous
0.002 yg/mL
10 pg/mL
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
n
Approved: ^f~ ^
5-60
CONC.
0.3
0.002
0.003
0.02
0.006
0.1
0.3
0.009
0.001
0.03
0.3
0.3
MC
0.7
MC
2
MC
•— j .""""•-
> v ^
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
/: r~X
-u , r^j*
x/- S
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA COM 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303278-9521
To; Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
p. O. No.: Subcontract No. SW59159A Release 11 Project 7601
Sample No.: 819493 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA Bottom Ash
test #3 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: February 3, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IADNo.:97-Nl82-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thul i urn
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
CONC.
16
32
17
<0.4
NR
2
2
3
0.4
4
1
3
5
7
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
CONC.
2
5
2
11
42
22
49
56
890
3
29
2
STO
0.6
0.3
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
9
39
270
41
400
22
6
18
8
3
28
55
110
220
64
MC
42
430
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i urn
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
140
MC
73
MC
MC
230
MC
PC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
78
10
>530
NR
STD - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC - Major Component >
INT — Interference
0.2 ppm
1000 ppm
Approved: ( ^ c_
5-61
"U -
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
. CA 94039
' 1984
P. O. NO.: Subcontract SW 59159A Release Number 11 Project: 7601
Sample No.: 319464 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
RA cyclone ash, test 3 CONCENTRAT1ON IN PPM WE1GHT
Analyst: G. Meagher
IAD No.:97-N182-116-28
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
CONC.
9
14
32
3
NR
1
1
1
0.2
1
0.4
0.8
1
Dysprosium 2
STO — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymium
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.1 ppm
1000 ppm
CONC.
0.6
2
1
5
10
9
30
34
310
4
0.2
0.2
5
2
STD
0.8
0.2
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
/o
Approved: \\^f
5-62
CONC.
6
13
28
12
210
28
5
13
18
7
19
24
14
31
10
MC
9
42
'j &
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
44
MC
15
MC
MC
13
220
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
-610
NR
NR
NR
27
5
>370
NR
k^£-N
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148. (312) 953-9300
ROBERT L. TAYLOR. Ph.D.
MANAGER
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO.
490 ORCHARD ST., GOLDEN, CO 80401
OFFICE TEL. (303)278-9521
SINCE i9oa
June 8, 1984
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
RE: IAD ff97-N815-116-18
Subcontract ffSW 59159A
Release #13
Analytical Report
Eighteen samples, previously analyzed for trace elements by spark source
mass spectrometry under our IAD identification #97-N182-116-28, were logged in
under our IAD identification #97-N815-ll6-18 on February 22, 1984.
Chlorine and Fluorine were determined using specific ion electrode methodo-
logy. Boron and Phosphorus were determined colorimetrically.
Depending on sample type and the amount of sample available, Sulfur was
determined turbidimetrically or by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry while the
remaining elemental analysis was performed using either atomic absorption/emission
spectrophotometry or X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
The results of these determinations are presented in the following tables.
Samples #1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17 and 18 are reported in weight
per cent (Wt.%) on an "as received" basis. Samples #5, 9, 11, 14 and 16 are
reported in micrograms per millilitres (ug/mL) on an "as received" basis.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please call.
^/
HaroTd A. Connell
Assistant Lab Manager
Robert L. Taylor, Ph.D., Mngr
Instrumental Analysis Div.
as
5-63
Charter Member
OVER 40 BRANCH LABORATORIES STRATEGICALLY LOCATED IN PRINCIPAL COAL MINING AREAS.
TIFIPWATPB AND r,R£AT LAKES PORTS. AND RIVER LOADING FACILITIES
-------
IAD #97-N8l5-116-18
Page 2 of 19
Table No. I
.^-As Received)
Parameter
Aluminum (Al)
Boron (B)
Ca 1 c i urn (Ca)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819463
RA Filter + l'u. Test 1
5.39
*
11.05
*
8.21
4.39
*
1.54
3.37
12.20
3.31
**
0.51
* Insufficient sample for analysis.
Unable to analyze due to contamination
from the fiberglass filter.
5-64
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD ,?97-N815-li6-18
Page 3 of 19
Parameter
Aluminum (AT)
Arsenic (As)
Boron (B)
Calcium (Ca)
Chlorine (Cl)
Chromium (Cr)
Copper (Cu)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Manganese (Mn)
Sodium (Na)
Nickel (Mi)
Phosphorus (P)
Lead (Pb)
Sulfur (S)
Antimony (Sb)
Silicon (Si)
Zinc (Zn)
Table No. II
Tfc-As Received)
819475
RA Filter. Test 2
1.30
0.13
*
0.25
0.03 (300 ug/g)
0.02 (200 ug/g)
0.02 (180 ug/g)
3.94
2.86
*
I0-1
0.04 (400 ug/g)
0.57
0.03 (250 ug/g)
3.93
4.69
2.58
<0.01 (<100 ug/g)
3.89
0.10
Insufficient sample for analysis.
5-65
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
f-466
-------
IAD #97-N815-il6-13
Page 4 of 19
Parameter
Aluminum (AT)
Arsenic (As)
Boron (8)
Barium (Ba)
Calcium (Ca)
Chromium (Cr)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Manganese (Mn)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Selenium (Se)
Silicon (Si)
Strontium (Sr)
Titanium (Ti)
Zinc (Zn)
Table No. Ill
(Wt.%-As Received)
319456
RA 10u + 3u, Test 1
7.58
0.05 (490 yg/g)
0.02 (230 ug/g)
0.19
1.32
0.004 (40 ug/g)
10.79
1.17
0.10 (950 yg/g)
0.43
0.09 (900 yg/g)
0.45
1.67
1.59
<0.001 (
-------
!AD -?97-M815-li5-i3
Pa-je 5 of 19
Table No. IV
(Wt.',i-As Received)
819492
Parameter RA 10p+ 3u, Test 2
Aluminum (AT) g_03
Boron (B) <_0.008 (<80 yg/g)
Calcium (Ca) i 37
Chlorine (Cl) g.42
Chromium (Cr) 0 14
Iron (Fe) 11.22
Potassium (K) 1.22
Lithium (Li) 0.02 (200 ug/g)
Magnesium (Mg) 0.40
Sodium (Ma) 0.52
Nickel (Ni) 0.03 (250 ug/g)
Phosphorus (P) 1.71
Sulfur (S) 3.06
Silicon (Si) 14.97
Titanium (Ti) 0.83
Zinc (Zn) . 0.07 (680 ug/g)
5-67
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAO *97-N815-116-18
Page 6 of 19
Table No. V
(ug/mi_-As Received)
Parameter
Calcium (Ca)
Chlorine (Cl)
Chromium (Cr)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Sodium (Na)
Nickel (Ni)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
819466
RA Imp l. Test 2
2.2
4,500 (0.45%)
96
42
450
2,000 (0.20%)
71
7,700 (0.77%)
12
5-68
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
Table No. VI
(W O- As Re eel v e d)
97-N815-116-18
Page 7 of 19
Parameter
Aluminum (Al)
Calcium (Ca)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819449
RA Coal. Test 1
1.19
0.19
0.34
0.12
0.05 (480 yg/g)
O.G5 (520 ug/g)
1.87
0.05 (540 pg/g)
5-69
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
ztk
-------
IAD 097-N815-116-18
Page 8 of 19
Table No. VII
(tO-As Received)
819485
Parameter RA PET, Test 2
Silicon (Si) 0.07
5-70
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD *97-N8l5-lI6-18
Page 9 of 19
Table No. vm
(Wt.^-As Received)
819488
Parameter RA Bottom Ash. Test 1
Aluminum (Al) 12.89
Calcium(Ca) 1.19
Fluorine (F)
-------
IAD «f97-N815-116-l8
Page 10 of 19
Table No. IX
(ug/mL-As Received)
819495
Parameter P.A Bottom Ash Leachate. Test 1
Calcium (Ca) 110
Potassium (K) 7.3
Magnesium (Mg) 4.7
Sulfur (S) 110
5-72
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD #97-N815-116-18
Page 11 of 19
Table No X
(Ut.S-As Received)
Parameter
Aluminum (AT)
Barium (Ba)
Calcium (Ca)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819498
RA Bottom Ash. Test 2
16.43
0.10 (985 yg/g)
2.59
<0.01
3.86
1.14
0.005(54 ug/g)
0.47
0.52
0.10
0.54
21.27
0.74
5-73
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
ztt.
-------
IAD #97-N8i5-116-13
Paae 12 of 19
Table No. XI
(ug/mL-As Received)
319496
Parameter RA Bottom AshLeachate, Test 2
Aluminum (AT) 14
Calcium (Ca) 53
Potassium (K) 5.1
Sodium (Ma) 7.1
Sulfur (S) 90
5-74
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD J97-N815-116-18
Page 13 of 19
Table No. XII
(wt ~% - As Received)
Parameter
Aluminum (AT)
Barium (Sa)
Calcium (Ca)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Silicon (Si)
Sulfur (S)
Titanium (Ti)
819493
RA Bottom Ash. Test 3
16.84
0.10
1.14
3.94
1.20
0.003 (75 vg/g)
0.34
0.42
0.09
20.88
0.11
0.74
5-75
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD 097-N815-116-18
Page 14 of 19
Table No. XIII
( Wt.%-As Received)
819476
Parameter RA Cyclone Ash. Test 1
Aluminum (AT) 5.62
Calcium (Ca) 0.67
Iron (Fe) 9.52
Potassium (K) 0.51
Magnesium (Mg) 0.15
Sodium (Na) 0.26
Phosphorus (P) 0.27
Sulfur (S) 4.05
Silicon (Si) 8.20
Titanium (Ti) 0.35
5-76
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD 297-N815-116-18
Page 15 of 19
Table No. XIV
(ug/mL-As Received)
819482
Parameter RA Cyclone Ash Leachate, Test 1
Aluminum (Al) 1,500 (0.15%)
Calcium (Ca) 1.8
Copper (Cu) 18
Fluorine (F) 42
Iron (Fe) 1,100 (0.11%)
Potassium (K) 140
Lithium (Li) 4.7
Magnesium (Mg) 110
Manganese (Mn) 24
Sodium (Na) 170
Phosphorus (P) 0.02
Sulfur (S) 15,300 (1.53%)
Silicon (Si) 89
Strontium (Sr) 24
Titanium (Ti) 4.4
Zinc (Zn) 44
5-77
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
for Your Protection
P-466
-------
Table No. XV
(l,!t .*-As Rece i ved)
IAD #97-N8l5-116-18
Page 16 of 19
Parameter
Aluminum (Al)
Calcium (Ca)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819504
RA Cyclone Ash, Test 2
6.66
2.27
11.27
0.64 *
0.43
0.27
0.33
2.81
9.84
0.45
5-78
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F 466
-------
IAD #97-N815-116-
Page 17 of 19
Table No. Xfj/ t
(ug/mL-As Received)
Parameter
Aluminum (AT)
Calcium (Ca)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Manganese (Mn)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819486
RA Cyclone Ash Leachate, Test 2
1,100 (0.11%)
1.9
38
540
56
4.4
96
18
170
<0.01
3,900 (0.39%)
210
0.5
5-79
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
Table No. XVII
(Wt.*-As Received)
IAD #97-N815-il6-18
Paye 18 of 19
Parameter
Aluminum (A1)
Calcium (Ca)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (?)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819464
RA Cyclone Ash, Test 3
13.57
1.28
9.35
1.75
0.01 (110 ug/g)
0.47
0.24
0.16
21.43
0.76
5-80
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
-------
IAD J97-N815-116-18
Page 19 of 19
Table No. XVIII
t.A-As Received)
Parameter
Aluminum (AT)
Calcium (Ca)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
819478
RA CoaT/PET, Test 2
1.56
0.09 (930 ug/g)
0.38
0.09 (910 ug/g)
Q.04 (370 yg/g)
0.04 (370
1.37
0.05 (430
5-81
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
f-466
-------
ACUREX
Corporation
ANALYSIS LABORATORIES
CUSTOMER
CMEA
DATA REPORTING FORM
January 13, 1984
CUSTOMER CONTRACT NO.
RESULTS REPORT TO L. Waterland
ADDRESS
Vermont
307736.62
DATE .
ACUREX CONTRACT NO. 13VU030
TELEPHONE
SAMPLE ID (CUSTOMER)
SAMPLE ID (LAB)
PARAMETER
N02"
N03-
V
F"
Cl~
so4"2
SO/2 and SO ~2
^ «J
Bottom
Ash
Test 1
488
<1
<1
<1
0.25
2.6
300
320
Cyclone
Ash
Test 1
476
<10
<10
<10
0.46
300
19,000
24,000
Bottom
Ash
Test 2
498
<1
<1
<1
0.10
1.3
220
240
Cyclone
'Ash
Test 2
504
<10
<10
<10
1.8
180
12,000
17,000
!
: rr — :— _. ~
. - -
— rr-: — — :
1 IKJIT1
^i/L.
™9/^
\ s
en
oo
ANALYST C. McMillen
Form 6ED-O57 4 BO
REVIEWER - -^'>
-------
5.6 TOTAL CHROMATOGRAPHABLE ORGANICS (TCO), GRAVIMETRIC ORGANICS (GRAV), GAS
CHROMATOJiRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC/MS), AND INFRARED SPECTRA (IR) OF
TOTAL SAMPLE EXTRACTS
5-83
-------
ACUREX
Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/ES January 16, 1984
Acurex ID#: 8310-003
8311-030
Client P0#: 307736.62
Attention: Larry Water!and
Sample: Vermont, Rock of Ages, 2 SASS Trains;
Received 7/12/83
The above samples were analyzed by Level ! protocol. The XAD and OMC
extracts were combined per your instruction. Organic extracts were also
analyzed for the semivolatile priority pollutants by gas chromatography/
mass spectrometry employing a J&W SE-54 30 meter capillary column. The
column was held at 30°C for 2 minutes, then ramped at 10°C per minute to
270°C. In addition to the priority pollutants, other organics including
benzo(c)phenanthrene, dibenzo(c,g)carbazole, 7,12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene,
3-methylcholanthrene, and perylene were sought employing the computerized
library search and manual interpretation. The assignment and quantisation
of these organics is tentative since analytical standards of these compounds
were not available for analysis. Benzo(c)phenanthrene, dibenzo(c,g)carbazole,
7,12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene, 3-methylcholanthrene and perylene were not
detected in any of the samples at levels above 400 yg per 10 mL of extract.
Submitted by:
Greg N-fcoll Viorica Lopez-Avila, Ph.D.
Operations Manager Technical Director
GN/VLA/ats
5-85
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
/S ACUREX
f ^ Corporation
ANALYSIS LABORATORIES
DATA REPORTING FORM
CUSTOMER CMEA
DATE January 16, 1984
307736.62
CUSTOMER CONTRACT NO.
RESULTS REPORT TO L. Waterland
ADDRESS
Vermont
ACUREX CONTRACT NO. 8310-003
TELEPHONE
en
i
oo
.
SAMPLE ID (CUSTOMER)
SAMPLE ID (LAB)
KAHAMcTbn
GRAV
TCO
PAH - Naphthalene
- Phenol
- Phenanthrene
- Fluoranthene
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl
phthalate ***
***
- Diethyl phthalat
XAD I
8
24
2.0
0.06
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
)
0.12
j <0.01
XAD II
23
27
**
3.5; 2.8
**
0.35;0.44
**
0.45;0.54
**
0.07;0.08
**
0.05;0.06
**
0.14;0.07
**
0.15;0.15
XAD Blk
14
<4
<0.2
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Front I
6
<8
__
__
__
__
--
--
Front II
20
<9
_ _
_ _
__
--
--
Bottom
Ash I
28
<80*
_..
.._
_ _
_ _
—
--
_-
Cyclone
Ash I
29
1100*
_ _
* .
__
__
__
--
--
Bottom
Ash II
32
220*
w _
_ _
_ _
—
__
Cyclone
Ash II
33
500*
_ —
_«
_ _
— _
_ _
--
__
mg/train
mg/ train
mg/train
mg/train
mg/train
mg/train
mg/train
mg/train
* mg/Kg
** Duplicate injection
Form EEO-OS7 4 8O
*** Normally found in laboratory blanks
at this leval
ANALYST U- Spannagel, C. Beeman. S^J
-------
|R REPORT
IAMPLE: 8310-03-6 Front Half Rinse
WIM Hamtar
?,q?n
2840
-
Irramity
S
S
Anipmwrt Cwnmwio
C-H Alkane Weak spectrum
C-H Alkane Weak spectrum
•
,•
5-87
-------
I* REPORT
SAMPLE:
8310-03-8
XAD Test I
WVM n£fWMF
. to.'1)
3650-2350
2970
2920
2860
1740
1600
1580
.1450
1370
1260
1160
1090
810
770
750
710
630
tmtmiry
M
S
S
M
M
W
W
M
W
M
M
M
M
W
Ariptnwnt CenurwnB
0-H Stretch
C-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
C=0
Not Assigned
Not Assigned
C-H
CH
C-0
c-o •
C-0
Not Assigned
Not Assigned
W . Not Assigned
W
W
Not Assigned
Not Assigned
Aliphatic
Carboxylic Acid
'
5-88
-------
I* REPORT
tAMPLE;_ 8310-03-14 XAD Blk
tmtmity
Comments
2920
C-H Stretch
weak spectrum
5-89
-------
R REPORT
UMPUE: 8310-03-28 Bottom Ash I
**H Rvmtar
. I.'1)
2920
2840
tmtwity
S
M
Anipmwt CommMti
C-H Alkane Weak Spectrum
C-H Alkane
•
•
— p
• •
5-90
-------
t* REPORT
SAMPLE:
8310-03-29 Cyclone Ash I
VNiw ftwfckMv
- i--1)
36sn-?™n
?Q4n
2860
1770
1740
1600
1460
. 1380
1270
1120
760
-
tnttmity
W
s
M
M
S
M
M
W
W
W
M
AnignnwRt Comments
OH Stretch broad
C-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
Not Assigned
C=0
Not Assigned
CH
CH
c-o
Not Assigned
•Not Assigned
•
AUphatic
Carboxylic Acid
•
5-91
-------
R REPORT
UMPLE: 8310-03-20 Front Half Rinse Test II
""JIT
2920
2S60
1730
-
tmtmity
S
M
M
AnignffMRt Cemmwrti
C-H Alkane Weak Spectrum
C-H Alkane
C=Q Tentative assignme
•
*
»•
•
5-92
-------
SAMPLE:
8310-03-23
XAD Test II
*"to?rr
3650-2 30
2960
2920
2860
1770
1740
1600
.1450
1370
1250
1080
800
720
-
lm*n*jty
W
M
M
M
W
S
W
M
W
M
M
M
W
ABigpmMtt Commanti
0-H Stretch broad
C-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
Not Assigned
C=0
Not Assigned
CH
CH
C-0
c-o •
Not Assigned
Not Assigned
^.
Aliphatic
Carboxylic Acid
5-93
-------
R REPORT
SAMPLE: 8310-03-32 Bottom Ash II
W__ •» — .. —
w^* ^vraw
- to.'1)
2930
-
tnttmity
S
Anignmtnt Commwtt
C-H Alkane Very Weak Spectrum
Tentative Assignment
•
«. •
5-94
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
8310-03-33 Cyclone Ash II
W** lt»ni>»
, to.'')
2920
2860
1770
1740-1680
ifinn
1460
1380
*
Imtnsity
S
M
M
M
M
M
W
Astiptmwrt Cwnmcna
C-H Stretch
C-H Stretch
No Assignment
C=0 Broad Assignment
Tentative
No Assianment
CH
CH
Aliphatic
•
*.
5-95
-------
GC/MS Detection Limits
ACID COMPOUND
21* 2,4,6-tricMorophenol
22A p-c*ilcro-i»»-cresol
24A 2-chloroshenol
3U 2.4-d'!ch1orophenol
34A 2, 4-d1methvl phenol
57A 2-n1trophenol
58A 4-nttrophencl
59A 2,4-d1nUroc*eno1
6DA 4,6-d1r1tro-&-crejsl
64A per.tachlorophenol
65A phenol
BASE/NEITTRAL COMPOUNDS
IB acenaphthene
SB benzidine
88 1 ,2,4-trichlorobenrene
98 hexachTorobenzene
12B hexacMoroethane
188 b1$(2-ch1oroethyl)ether
20B 2-chloronaphthelene
253 l,2-d1chlo':beniene
26B l,3-d1chlorobeniene
27B 1 ,4-d1ehTorobenzene
2BB 3,3'-d1ch7orobenz1d1ne
3SB 2,4-d1nUrotoluene
36B 2,6-d1n1trotoluene
37B l,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne
(as azobenzene)
396 fluoranthene
408 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ni
5
5
5
5
5
5
20
20
20
5
1
1
20
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
BASE/NEUTRAL CCWP0UN05
41 B 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
42B t>1s(2-chlorotsoprop.yl)ether
43B b1s(2-chTort>ethoxy}wthane
52B hexachlorobutadlene
53B hexachlorocyclopentadlene
?4B Isophorone
i5B naphthalene
56B nUrobenzene
618 H-rnrosod1meth>l8Trine
628 N-n1trosodipheny1anrtne
63B N-nltrosodi-n-propyTamine
658 b1$(2-«ti»lhexyl3phthalate
678 butylbenzyl phthalate
688 dt-n-butyl phthalate
698 d1-n-octyl phthalate
708 dlethyl phthalate
718 d-f methyl phthalate
728 ber,zo(a}anthracene
738 ben2o(a]pyrene
748 3.4-benzofluoranthene
758- befizc(k)fluoranthene
768 chrysene
778 acenaphthylene
788 anthracene
798 benzo(3h1)pery1ene
806 fluorene
618 pher.anthrene
828 dtbenzo(a,h)anthracene
838 1ndeno(l,2,3-cd)pypene
848 pyrtne
na
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NA
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 '
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
5
S
1
5-96
U/V.fi
-------
5.7 LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (LC) SEPARATION AND IR SPECTRA OF LC FRACTIONS
5-97
-------
AACUREX
. Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/ES (CMEA)
MS 2-2260
Attention: Larry Waterland
Sample: Cyclone Ash, Rock of Ages; Received 2/10/84
March 12, 1984
Acurex ID#: 8402-020
Client P0#: 307736.62
The above samples were subjected to liquid chromatography followed by
gravimetric measurement and infrared spectrophotometry according to Level 1
protocol.
Results are enclosed.
Submitted by:
John S. Labash
.Chemist
v- / / /
Approved by: ,--_^-- u'.:/ <- i...s (V
Greg Nicoll
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
JSL/GN/ats
Enclosures
5-99
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
SAMPLE: Rock of Ages Cyclone Ash Test 1 #819476 8402-020-1
TCO
8MAV
TCO + OMV
Kq
Till**,'
55
1100
22
440
28
560
on
i
O
o
FftrttM
1
f
I
4
1
I
»
7
SMI
TttfaMl
FMniki
FnctiM
Ita*
t~
•••1^
VWiW
T.U^
•RAVbmi
r«Miii
FfKllM
5.0
0.8
2.2
1.8
2.2
11.6
4.6
28.2
•h*
<0.5
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
0.6
Q.6
to
IVClM
5.0
0.8
2.2
1.8
2.2
11.6
4.0
27. §
Tttel4
12
2
6
4
6
29
10
69
TCO«
6RAV
T«trfM|
vMMMVVwMI
mg/Kg
240
40
120
80
120
580
200
1400
Omntffy nMwc
LC ntomii *ct«l mi
-------
|R REPORT
SAMPLE: 2-20-1 LCF 1 Cyclone Ash Test 1
Wm Nwntar
> to-'1)
2940
I 1468
1384
lira miry
S
M
W
Antgnnwnt Cammcna
CH Alkane
CH2
Unassigned
•
->-
_
5-101
-------
JR REPORT
SAMPLE: 2-20-1 LCF 2
Wwt ftvmtar
Inttnuty
Cemmcna
2940
CH Alkane
Weak Spectrum
5-102
-------
Ifl REPORT
SAMPLE: 2-20-1 LCF 3
W** NwntMt
, U.'1)
2939
1462
Irnansity
S
M
Anignmoftt Comment*
CH Alkane
CH2
— _
J
5-103
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 2-20-1 LCF 4
WVM V**tar
2940
1460
tnttmity
CH
CH2
Assignment
Alkane
Cemmtnti
5-104
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE 2-20-1 LCF 5
1
Vm Nw*tar
.- u.'1)
2940
1783
1710
1600
1465
Intimity
S
M
S
M
M
Anignmwit Commcrm
CH Alkane
Unassigned
C=0 (tentative)
Unassigned
CH2
Weak spectrum
•
^f
5-105
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
2-20-1 LCF 6
Wt*« KvmlMr
- U.'1)
3300
2941
1780
1730
1600
1455
1290
Imansity
U
S
M
S
M
M
M
AnignfflMrt Cenwrwnti
OH Broad
CH Alkane
Unassigned
C=0
Unassigned
CH2
C-0
•
•»•
•
5-106
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
2-20-1 LCF 7
V*M Hmmkm
- t-1>
3350
2943
1725
1600
1460
1285
Imamity
S
S
S
S
w
w
Anignmcnt Comments
OH Broad
CH A1 kan.e
C=0
Unassigned
CH2
C-0 Broad
•> .
5-107
-------
SAMPLE: Rock of Ages Cyclone Ash Test 2 #819504 8402-020-2
TMrfSMpk1
TMMhrlC*
RflMWfM
TCO
ni
6RAV
*i|
25
22
27
TCO + ORAV
Tvtetmf
C9IKMnf9flMM
mg/Kg
500
440
540
o
oo
t. QiMtfty In MrtM HM^M, •ttmiliwl knviv 1C
2. rnrtlMtrwIitltwmplf «i»4l»rLC. ictnilmi
31 QttMitffy ntvnni IrMi 1C Mhrnm, Ktatl mf
4. T«til mf nimttwl «»•«•" '• '••»' i»"l>>*
FnctlM
f
t
3
4
6
•
1
Sum
TCOfomi
FwmllN
FnctlM
«Mh
Cw
rattri
T««ri*
ORAVbMl
Fmnrfte
FnctlM
5.0
1.8
3.4
2.4
2.6
8.4
3.6
27.2,
Item
<0.5
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
0.6
fl.fj
Cw-
•-- *
ffVCIMi
5.0
1.8
3.4
2.4
2.6
8.4
3.0
26,6
Tttil4
5.6
2.0
3.8
2.7
2.9
9.3
3.3
29,6
TCO 4
fiRAV
T.Ulmf
CM«MMtlM
mg/Kg
110
40
76
54
58
190
66
590
-------
IB REPORT
SAMPLED 2-20-2 LCF 1 Cyclone Ash Test 2
V**
tm»rnitv
Anignmtnt
Comment!
121L
1460
CH Alkane
CH2
5-109
-------
R REPORT
IAMPUE: 2-20-2 LCF 2
W*» Kwnfc*
.• to.'1)
2940
Intimity
S
Anignmtnt Commtno
CH Stretch Alkane
•
^ t
5-110
-------
fR REPORT
SAMPLE: 2-20-2 LCF 3
p*WW nV^^vHv
- <-•')
2941
1460
tnttraity
S
M
l
;
Anignmwrt Cemmtnti
CH Alkane
CH2
Weak spectrum
•
^_
•
5-111
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
2-20-2 LCF 4
W*« Mwntar
- u.-1)
2940
1775
1705
1460
tiramity
S
w
M
M
Anignmtnt Comment!
CH Alkane
Unassigned
C=0 (tentative)
CH2
Weak spectrym
•
^ r_
5-112
-------
I* REPORT
SAMPLE:
2-20-2
HF ,5
WVA "WMWf
- to-*1)
yun
i7«n
T71R
ifinn
1460
1300
Imvnsity
•^
^
5
«;
M
M
Ai»iy»m«nt Commtna
CH Alkane
Not Assianed
C=0
Not Assigned
CH?
C-0
•
..
5-113
-------
Ifl REPORT
SAMPLE:
2-2Q-.2 l£L.6-
W«w WemlMr
- to.*1)
3300
2945
1782
1735
1600
1460
)
i
Intimity
'/!
S
M
S
M
M
I
Atsignmtnt Cornmcnts
OH Broad
CH Alkane
Unassigned
C=0 Tentative
Unassigned
CH2
5-114
-------
IK
SAMPLE:
2-20-2 LCF 7
Wi** Ptoffltar
... (-1)
3400
2943
1725
1600
1458
1?75
liromity
S
S
S
S
M
W
Awignrnwrt Commants
OH Broad
CH Alkane
C=0
Unassigned
CH2
C-0 Broad
'
•
*.
5-115
-------
ACUREX
Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/ES (CMEA) March 13, 1984
MS 2-2260 Acurex ID#: 8401-029
Client P0#: 307736.62
Attention: Larry Water!and
•Sample: Honor Rancho Inlet XAD, Rock of Ages XADs;
Received 1/20/84
The above samples were subjected to liquid chromatography followed by TCO,
gravimetric measurement, and infrared spectrophotometry according to Level 1
protocol.
Results are enclosed.
Prepared by:
S. LSbash
/Chemist
Approved by:
Greg Nletll
Manager, Inorganic Chemistry
JSL/GN/ats
5-116
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View. CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
84151-029-2
SAMPLE: 819459 Rock of Ages Test 1 XAD-2
Titoitw"**!1
MM to 1C*
ItaMMntf'
TCO
•1
?.o
1.1
0.6
tRAV
»•
?4
14
7.9
TCO + OflAV
TMrfmt
26
15
8.5
CMIWtnttMl
mg/dscm
CJl
o — -« —
rfMUMI
i
t
i
4
I
1
k
1
SM
TCO !• M|
Nwifa
rftCtMNI
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
ItoA
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.9
Cw-
flMVN
n.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
T««*
1.1
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
1.1
•HAVInril
rwMtfh
FlMtlM
].5
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
0.8
2.6
3.6
8.5
«-
<0.5
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
0.6
0.6
Ur-
mM
1.5
<0.4
<0.4
<0.4
0.8
2.6
3.0
7.9
Ttttl1
2.6
<0.7
<0.7
<0.7
1.4
4.6
5.3
13.9
TCO»
0RAV
TitalMM
3.7
<0.9
<0.9
<0.9
1.4
4.6
5.3
15
tft^M^AM^^feAX«.M
cwwnniviwii
mg/dscm
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
>-CF 1
tmtmity
A»*ignmtnt
2930
CH Alkane
Weak spectrum
5-118
-------
|R REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-2 LCF 2
WnwMwnb*
.- to.'1)
Inttmity
Attignmtnt
Comments
No Peaks
5-119
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-2 LCF 3
Inttnsity
Attignmtnt
Comments
No Peaks
5-120
-------
IB REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-?Q-? LCF 4
limmity
Auignmtnt
Commtna
Nn
5-121
-------
IR Rt-ORf
SAMP -E:
1 - 29-2 LCF 5
m Nwntar
tnttmity
Aistgnmtflt
Comments
No Peaks
5-122
-------
IH REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-2 LCF 6
WawMimlMr
.- <-')
2935
1745
Inttmity
S
s
i
Aitignmtnt Coromwm
CH Alkane
C=0 *
* Tentative assignment
'
5-123
-------
R REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-2 LCF 7
tt«w Nwntar
- to.'1)
2950
Intensity
S
Awignmtot Commtnu
CH Alkane
•
5-124
-------
8401-029-3
SAMPLE: 819465 Rock of Ages Test 2 XAD-2
TvWlSwpIt1
Tab* to 1C*
tt^^AHM^dK'
WB^WrBw^W
TCO
»•
3.2
1.6
<0.8
BMV
•1
27
13
13.6
TCO* OHM V
Tcttlwf
30
15
14
j. ._.«_^
KMCMIIVnMI
mg/dscro
en
i
ro
en
FmtlM
t
1
I
4
I
t
I
SMI
TCOhwi
F«Mrfk
FnrtfcM
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1*
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.8
MM*
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.9
e
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-3 LCF 1
Wat Mwnbw
Intimity
Aiiignmtnt
Cwnmwm
2930
H Alkane
5-126
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-3 LCF 2
ffw* Nwnbtr
Imtmity
Assignment
Comments
No Peaks
5-127
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-3 LCF 3
WawNtmtar
- ton'1)
Intimity
Anignnwnt
CommMits
No peaks
5-128
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-3 LCF 4
(a.'1)
Intvmity
Atiignmtnt
Comments
2915
CH Alkane
Weak spectrum
5-129
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-3 LCF 5
lira mi ty
Anignnwnt
Comments
2940
CH Alkane
Weak spectrum
5-130
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-3,
-CF 6
Wm NwnlMr
.- I-1)
2940
1725
IntimitY
S
S
Afiignmcnt Comm«its
CH Alkane
C=0 *
* Tentative Assignment
*
•
w.
5-131
-------
R REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-3 LCF 7
W^— M «.
WV TVWTVW
• tan'1)
2940
Intensity
s
Anignmwit Con»m«ntf
CH Alkane
Weak soectrum
'
•
V >
5-132
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-BLK LCF-1
W*n
Intaraity
Assignment
Comments
No Peaks
5-133
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-BLK LCF 2
Intimity
Anignmtnt
Cefflmtnts
No Peaks
5-134
-------
in REPORT
SAMPLE;,. 1-29-BLK LCF 3
NwnlMr
tmtraity
Aitignmtnt
Caram*nts
No Peaks
5-135
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-BLK LCF 4
Intimity
Atsignmtnt
Commtrtn
_No Peaks
5-136
-------
|R REPORT
SAMPLE: 1-29-BLK LCF 5
Wo* NwniMr
... Cm')
2935
Intimity
S
Assignment CommtnO
CH Alkane
Weak spectrum
*
•
«.
5-137
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-BLK LCF 6
(a.'1)
trmmity
Attignmtnt
Comminti
No Peaks
5-138
-------
IB REPORT
SAMPLE:
1-29-BLK LCF 7
Wi*« Nwntar
imtraity
Asiignmtm
Comments
No Peaks
5-139
-------
5.8 GC/MS ANALYSES OF VOST TRAPS
5-141
-------
AACUREX
. Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/E.S.
Attention: Larry Water!and
November 1, 1983
Acurex ID#: 8307-010
Customer P0#: 307736.62
Page 1 of 2
Subject: Analysis of Two VOST Sample Sets
by GC/MS.
The above referenced samples were analyzed according to the latest revisions
of the EPA VOST Protocol for Volatile Priority Pollutants and Xylenes. An
attempt was also made to identify ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, 2-nitropropane
and ally! chloride, but due to the lack of analytical standards for these
compounds, it proved impossible.
Results are listed in Table 1.
Please call if you have any questions.
Prepared by:
William G. Hellier
Staff Chemist
Approved
Viorica Lopez-Avila, Ph.D.
Technical Director
WGH/VLA/ats
5-143
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
Acurex/ES
8307-010
Page 2 of 2
Table 1. Volatile Organics Results
Trap ID
Lab ID
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Dichloromethane
1 ,1-Dichloroethylene
1 ,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
~ Carbon tetrachloride
Dichl orobromomethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1 ,3-Dichloropropene( trans)
Trichloroethylene
Chi orodi bromomethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,3-Dichloropropene(cis)
Benzene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Xylenes
Die hi orodi fluoromethane
Tr ichl orof 1 uoromethane
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Toluene-do
Concentration (ng/trap)
Tenax/C
81 950.1
-i^ij-^
-1
12
ND
ND
ND
65
98
ND
ND
22
ND •
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
7
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
95
Tenax
819501
-^*~ ,1 i ->
-*T2a
10
ND
ND
ND
>1,100
ND
ND
ND
67
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
483
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
51
ND
146
152
14
ND
ND
ND
57
Tenax/C
81 950)
J&e'-S
™
-------
5.9 N20 ANALYSES BY GC/ECD
5-145
-------
AACUREX
- Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/E.S.
Attention: Larry Waterland
September 2, 1983
Acurex ID#: 8308-012
Client P0#: 307736.62
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Analysis of 2 Gas Bombs for Nitrous Oxide by GC/ECD
The above referenced samples were analyzed by GC/ECD according to previously
reported method.
Results are listed in the table below:
Sample ID
812714
812715
(ppm)
27
58
If you have any questions, please call.
Submitted by:
William G. Hellier
Staff Chemist
Approved by:
VioricaLopez-Avila, Ph.D
Technical Director
WGH/VLA/ats
5-147
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (4t5) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
5.10 BIOASSAY RESULTS
In the following, samples with the prefix "RA" are for these tests;
samples with prefixes "HR", or "DM" are for other tests performed.
5-149
-------
T3
n E1ONET1CS 5516 Nicholson Lane Kensington Waryland 20895 301 081-5600-Telex 89-8369
Litton
April 18, 1984
Dr. Larry Water!and
Acurex Corporation
485 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, California 94042
RE: Acurex Subcontract No. RB59178A
Release No. 6
Dear Larry:
Enclosed are three bound, and one unbound, copies of the final reports for the
five XAD resin extract samples and six ash samples submitted for testing and
evaluation in IERL-EPA Level 1 Ames/Salmonella mutagenesis and CHO cytotoxi-
city bioassays. All studies were conducted and evaluated under IERL-EPA Level
1 guidelines.
Bioassay of the samples took slightly longer than normal because a phased
testing approach was used with the XAD-2 resin extract samples. This phased
approach involved initial CHO cytotoxicity testing, then preliminary range-
finding Ames tests with only one strain, followed by one or more definitive
Ames assays. By using this approach, we were able to adequately test and
evaluate all samples.
The summary of the bioassay data, the criteria used to evaluate the results,
the critical data upon which the evaluations were based, and a graphic display
of the relative ranking of the samples are presented in the attached tables
and figures.
If you have any questions or comments concerning these reports or future
testing, please fell free to contact me at (301) 881-5600, extension 536.
Sincerely,
LITTON BIONETICS, INC.
Robert R.
Environmental Assessment Section
Department of Molecular Toxicology
RRY/mg
Enclosures: Ames and CHO 7330-7346 Reports.
cc: Contracts, LBI No. 20993, 20988
5-150
-------
TABLE 1
BIOASSAY SUMMARY TABLE
Technical Directive or Project No. LBI Project No. 20988 and 20993.
Contract No. EPA No. 68-02-3188; ACUREX Subcontract No. RB 59178A Release No. 6.
|Health Effects Testsl Ecological Effects Tests
Aquatic I Terrestrial
Sample Identification
Notes
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT,
INLET (819369)
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT,
OUTLET (819370)
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT,
TEST 1 (819459)
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT,
TEST 2 (819465)
DM XAD-2 EXTRACT
(900206)
RA BOTTOM ASH,
TEST 1 (819488)
RA BOTTOM ASH,
TEST 2 (819498)
RA CYCLONE ASH,
TEST 1 (819476)
RA CYCLONE ASH,
TEST 2 (819504)
DM FILTER + 1 urn PART.
(900204)
DM 10 ym + 3 urn PART.
(900218)
H
M
H
M .
M
ND
ND
M/H
L^M
ND
ND
•
M/H
M
M
H/M
M
ND
ND
ND
ND
L
L
ND = No Detectable Toxicity
L = Low Toxicity
M = Moderate Toxicity
H = High Toxicity
LBI-0468 R 11/80
5-151
-------
TABLE 2
DEFINITION OF TOXICITY CATEGORIES FOR HEALTH EFFECTS ASSAYS
en
i
en
rv>
Assay3 Activity Measured*3
Ames
RAM
CHO
WAT
MEC
(mutagenesis)
EC50
(lethality)
EC50
(lethality)
LD50
(lethality and toxic signs)
Sample
Type
S
AL.NAL
E
S
AL
NAL
E
S
AL
NAL
E
S
AL.NAL
MADd
5
200
5000
1
600
20
1000
1
600
20
1000
5
5
Range of Concentration or Dosage
Units
mg/plate
pi/plate
L/plate
mg/ml
Ml/ml
Ml /ml
L/ml
mg/ml
Ml/ml
Ml /ml
L/ml
gm/kg
ml /kg
High
<0.05
<2
<50
<0.01
<6
<0.2
<10
<0.01
<6
<0.2
<10
<0.05
<0.05
Moderate
0.05-0.5
2-20
50-500
0.01-0.1
6-60
0.2-2
10-100
0.01-0.1
6-60
0.2-2
10-100
0.05-0.5
0.05-0.5
Low Not Detectable
(ND)
0.5-5
20-200
500-5000
0.1-1
60-600
2-20
100-1000
0.1-1
60-600
2-20
100-1000
0.5-5
0.5-5
ND at >5
ND at >200
ND at >5000
ND at >1
ND at >600
ND at >20
ND at >1000
ND at >1
ND at >600
ND at >20
ND at >1000
ND at >5
ND at >5
Standard test abbreviations are as follows:
Ames: Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenesis assay
RAM: Rabbit alveolar macrophage cytotoxicity assay
CHO: Rodent cell clonal toxicity assay
WAT: Acute ±n vivo test in rodents (whole animal test)
Standard abbreviations for measured endpoints are as follows:
MEC: Minimum effective concentration
EC50: Calculated concentration expected to produce effect in 50 percent of population
LD50: Calculated dose expected to kill 50 percent of population
CS = Solid, AL = Aqueous liquid, NAL = Nonaqueous liquid, E = Extract and/or concentrate of unknown organic content
(use equivalent volume of SASS train gas)
MAD = Maximum applicable dose
-------
Contract No. EPA No. 68-02-3188
Acurex Subcontract No. RB 59178A
Release No. 6
Sample Identification
TABLE 3
HEALTH EFFECTS CRITICAL DATA SUMMARY FORM8
Directive or Project No. LBI No. 20988 and Site Sampled HR. RA and DM
20993
Ames CHO Clonal |
Mutagenicity Toxicity Viability
[MEC]b [ECsolc Viability Index
RAM Cytotoxiclty JEC50jc
Rodent Toxicity
ATP
ATP/ Per
106 Cells LDsod
Toxic Signs'
en
i
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT, INLET
819369
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT, OUTLET
819370
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT, TEST 1
819459
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT, TEST 2
819465
DM XAD-2 EXTRACT
900206
RA BOTTOM ASH, TEST 1
819488
RA BOTTOM ASH, TEST 2 '
819498
RA CYCLONE ASH, TEST 1
819476
RA CYCLONE ASH, TEST 2
819504
DM FILTER + 1 urn PART.
900204
DM Id w + 3 urn PART.
900218
25f
100
20
137.5
200
> 10000
> 10000
50
500
> 10000
> 10000
11. 5f
18.4
35.2
9.35
16.0
>1000
(4000)
1400
>1000
(5000)
>1000
(1200)
140
450
aThe assays, observed parameters and evaluation criteria are presented in JERL-RTP Procedures Manual; Level 1_ Environmental Assessment
Biological Tests, [EPA Contract No. 68-02-2681, Litton Bionetics, Inc., Kensington, Md.l
bMEC: Minimum Effective Concentration - Lowest concentration for any tester strain giving a mutagenic response.
cECcn: Effective concentration that reduces the observed parameter to 50 percent of the appropriate negative control.
dLD5fj: The dose lethal to 50 percent of treated animals.
-Toxic signs are identified in a numbered list in the Level 1 manual. Only the number is reported here.
^Concentrations are ug organics per plate for Ames assay and per ml of culture medium for the CHO assay. Values in
parenthesis are extrapolated values.
-------
10,000 ug/ml
NONDETECTABLE
TOXICITY
RANGE
1,000 ug/ml
LOW
TOXICITY
RANGE
100 ug/ml
MODERATE
TOXICITY
RANGE
10 ug/ml
HIGH
TOXICITY
RANGE
() RA cyclone ash, test 1 (8]9476) Extrapolated
RA bottom ash, test 1 (819488) Extrapolated
RA bottom ash, test 2 (819498)
RA cyclone ash, test 2 (819504) Extrapolated
DM 10 ym + 3 ym paniculate (900218)
DM filter + 1 ym particulate (900204)
RA XAD-2 extract, test 1 (819459)
HR XAD-2 extract, outlet (819370)
DM XAD-2 extract (900206)
HR XAD-2 extract, inlet (819369)
XAD-2 extract, test 2 (819465)
1 ug/ml
f
Figure 1. Ranking of test material toxicity using EC50
in EPA level 1 CHO clonal toxicity assay.
5-154
-------
NONDETECTABLE
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
5,000 ug/plate
LOW
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
500 ug/plate < >• RA Cyclone Ash, test 2 (819504)
MODERATE
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
50 ug/plate
HIGH
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
5 ug/plate
RA Bottom Ash, test 1 (819488)
RA Bottom Ash, test 2 (819498)
DM Filter + 1 ym Participate (900204)
DM 10 ym + 3 ym Particulate (900218)
DM XAD-2 Extract (90Q206)
RA XAD-2 Extract, test 2 (819465)
HR XAD-2 Extract, outlet (819370)
RA Cyclone Ash, test 1 (819476)
HR XAD-2 Extract, inlet (819369)
RA XAD-2 Extract, test 1 (819459)
Figure 2. Ranking of test material mutagenicity using minimum effective
concentration in EPA level 1 Ames mutagenesis assay.
5-155
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read iHUructions on the reverse before completing)
\ REPORT NO.
EPA-600/7-86-011b
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Environmental Assessment of a Commercial Boiler
Fired with a Coal /Waste Plastic Mixture; Volume II.
Data Supplement
5. REPORT DATE
April 1986
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHOR(S)
R. DeRosier, H.I. Lips, and L. R. Waterland
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
A cur ex Corporation
Energy and Environmental Division
P. O. Box 7044
Mountain View, California 94039
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3188
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final; 7/83 - 7/84
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
is. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES AEERL project officer is Joseph A.
919/541-2920. Volume I contains the technical results.
McSorley, Mail Drop 65,
is. ABSTRACT
repOrt gives results of comprehensive emissions testing and labora-
tory analyses of a stoker-fired commercial boiler firing a coal/waste plastic mix-
ture. In one test, the unit fired its typical coal fuel; in the other, shredded waste
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) beverage bottles were added to the coal to about
16% by weight in the mixed fuel. NOx, total unburned hydrocarbon, and solid parti-
culate were relatively unchanged for the two tests, as was the emitted particle size
distribution. SOx emissions decreased with the coal/PET fuel in keeping with its
lowered sulfur content; average CO emissions were also decreased. Flue gas emis-
sions of most trace elements were comparable for both tests, as were the trace ele-
ment compositions of corresponding ash streams. However, lead emissions were
significantly increased for the coal/PET fuel, reflecting an increased lead content
of the mixed fuel. The cyclone hopper ash for the coal/PET test had consistently
lower leachable trace element and anion content than for the coal fuel test. Total
flue gas organic emissions were comparable for both tests, in the 1 mg/dscm
range; although levels of several semivolatile priority pollutants were higher for
the mixed fliel.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATi Field/Croup
Pollution
Assessments
Combustion
Coal
Plastics
Polyethylene Terephthalate
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Environmental Assess-
ment
Coal/Waste Fuel
13 B
14B
21B
21D
111
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
203
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
b-lob
-------
|