-------
Run Number 4,
NOX SAMPLE RECOVERY
AND ANALYSIS
Flask No.
Final Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Sample Number
Date
Clock Time
Performed by
Analysis Procedure
Sample Number
Absorbance of Sample
Absorbance of Blank
Calibration Curve No.
Mass of NOX as N©2 (us)
Analysis Date
Analyzed by
Comments:
SAMPLE RECOVERY
n
a/
a. 3
O.I
o./
0-3
/-^r-yv
/3/a
/V30
ANALYSIS
f
O.IMI
G
0
4-89
-------
ACUREX CORPORATION
Run Number
Dote \~
~7
NOX SAMPLING
PROBE
Unit No. Length =
3
*>/*
Lining
Material
ft D S. Steel
0 Pyrex
Pre-Filter
Heated
Pitot
Tube
Glass Wool
SAMPLING DATA
Flask No.
Volume of Flask
Less Absorb. Soln.
Initial Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Leak Check
Sampling Location:
Port
Point or Distance from
Inside of Port
Clock Time
Performed by
Comments:
(js. (s>
IZ.9
(3.0
ok_
Cfr>
not
,ni6
4-90
Yes No.
Coefficient:
D .ss r
ILs.2.
,[731
-------
307735.
Run Number *7
NOX SAMPLE RECOVERY
AND ANALYSIS
Flask No.
Final Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Sample Number
Date
Clock Time
Performed by
Analysis Procedure
Sample Number
Absorbance of Sample
Absorbance of Blank
Calibration Curve No.
Mass of NOX as NC>2 (jig)
Analysis Date
Analyzed by
Comments:
F/asb
SAMPLE RECOVERY
If
-70
0-0
0.3
0
O.fc
t-j.
nomm
ANALYSIS
ph c^ZO K,cfT t C
£>.|3I
O
4-91
-------
307-735-^)
ACUREX CORPORATION
Run Number
Date i-
NOX SAMPLING
PROBE
Unit No. Length =
Lining
Materiel
ft D S. Steel
0"!
Pre-Filter
Heated
Pitot
Tube
Glass Wool L^ Yes No. £_
D No Coefficient
.85
SAMPLING DATA
Flask No.
Volume of Flask
Less Absorb. Soln.
Initial Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in.
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Leak Check
Sampling Location:
Port
Point or Distance from
Inside of Port
Clock Time
Performed by
Comments:
Hg)
(a?
/3.O
0/C
Crv,
cinamc
4-92
-------
3o~?
Run Number
NOX SAMPLE RECOVERY
AND ANALYSIS
Flask No.
Final Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Sample Number
Date
Clock Time
Performed by
SAMPLE RECOVERY
ao
Analysis Procedure
Sample Number
Absorbance of Sample
Absorbance of Blank
Calibration Curve No.
Mass of NOX as NC>2
Analysis Date
Analyzed by
Comments:
03
0,3
ANALYSIS
t c
O.C1?
o
/V^W^ rv\
-71
0.3
0.2-
/33O
4-93
-------
36713*. Fl
ACUREX CORPORATION
Run Number
Date (-"
NOX SAMPLING
PROBE
Unit No. Length =
Lining
Material
Pre-Filter
Heated
Pitot
Tube
ft D S. Steel
0 Pyrex rn
Glass Wool Q Yes No. *)/fi
n No Coefficient:
a .ss n
SAMPLING DATA
Flask No.
Volume of Flask
Less Absorb. Soln.
Initial Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Leak Check
Sampling Location:
Port
Point or Distance from
Inside of Port
Clock Time
Performed by
Comments:
2.3
2 031
13,0
13.0
OKL
/.f
rn/wn
4-94
-------
Run Number
NOX SAMPLE RECOVERY
AND ANALYSIS
SAMPLE RECOVERY
Flask No.
Final Conditions:
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Flask Temperature (°F)
Flask Vacuum (in. Hg):
Top
Bottom
Difference
Sample Number
Date
Clock Time
Performed by
Analysis Procedure
Sample Number
Absorbance of Sample
Absorbance of Blank
Calibration Curve No.
Mass of NOX as NO2 fog)
Analysis Date
Analyzed by
Comments:
t 'If. 3
f/,,-2-
&.0
ANALYSIS
9/0/MZ.2.
4-95
-------
PLANT C
LOCATION
DATE "2
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. H6.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT '^ ''
TEST NUMBER
OPERATOR
//I,/ 7 /- '/v->?
N0 SAMPLING DATA
Time
/;^j'
'f!O
/rJ*
Flask
Number
•t /•»
x —
«<.*
*~f
/ -
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
?c*o£
IcS"^
2<:Vi.
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
t'1,.0
-> p -t
'-•'•- t /
7^rO
Flask
Temp
(°F)
c^ <^~
^ -*
6*5
^o
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
a . cf
/,*>
A
-------
PLANT
LOCATION 5 69
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT ^ "'.^^r C/Y
OPERATOR
/= /•/-,'
TEST NUMBER
N0y SAMPLING DATA
A
Time
//rr
A'/i>
/^<
Flask
Number
•/*>
f'rJ
! 1
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
7^" ^^
2^'l
-/ -,*~^.
<..*• ~^~'
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
•z^fxf
2S-.7
??'
-------
PLANT
LOCATION
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT 3^ 'v.
TEST NUMBER £*^ ^
OPERATOR
r?
5 7
Ff/vc^-O
2-j^3
:c.?7
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
2 £ ?
'.•" "7
'•-•- 1 I
im
Flask
Temp
(°F)
r/
70
73
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
£W
-/^/a
^ . >
Flask
Temp
(°F)
-^7
60
u>O
4-98
-------
PLANT CXi?>--/-'-vv
LOCATION -5t'rj
DATE ?_~3
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT ',..
OPERATOR
TEST NUMBER
f
NO SAMPLING DATA
Time
r^c^
/ X»J> ^
f*ito
(ViC
Flask
Number
i'
^
rr3
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
/??£
?o^^
7 1^53
•
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
??'-*'
^.7
If.t,
Flask
Temp
(°F)
73
^ s
7'^
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
2, /
1,5
0,O
Flask
Temp
(°F)
6f
6±
Cf
4-99
-------
PLANT
LOCATION
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT -?;,-•-.
TEST NUMBER
OPERATOR
C.n
SAMPLING DATA
Time
kfO
f&>
I'sSc-
Flask
Number
•^3
_u < — •
j. /
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
- ^ ^ /"
O .- ^ !
Z?-><
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
r.-r<£
?-~A
?r,<
Flask
Temp
(°F)
70
G!
£1
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
o. a
'• /
*~f t~i
(. <"-'
Flask
Temp
(°F)
•r- /
X' •->
•t ^>
x^ *>'""
^ — >
4-100
-------
PLANT C
LOCATION
DATE 2
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT >• '-fb
iP^'b
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
~r,5~
r- s: 5
?f,i
\
Flask
Temp
(°F)
^;c"7
^,p
61
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
/, 7
o, v
A/
Flask
Temp
(°F)
d'c/
^f
^(J
4-101
-------
PLANT
LOCATION
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.) 2
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT
OPERATOR
>.
TEST NUMBER
"7
NO SAMPLING DATA
Time
r A ;,'..'
^-?^
/r*r
Flask
Number
_C
/
7/9
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
/??'/
/996
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
-zrr
-2r,-6
2 7, "5
Flask
Temp
(°F)
b?
•-^ i
/ <7^
1^
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
//^
//6
^3"'
Flask
Temp
(°F)
&>~
££
£-Z
4-102
-------
PLANT G^V/c*-v ( e
LOCATION ?(,<$ £
//-
Flask
Temp
(°F)
<; •-,
^.?
C 7
4-103
-------
V-J
PLANT L
LOCATION
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG.)
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT lc' ,.-.y\
TEST NUMBER •£*'•* *1
OPERATOR
/•>
N0x SAMPLING DATA
Time
'Z.C/O
L V<- ^
ic^fj
Flask
Number
/>
/6
«7
-
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
.I'o/f
Zo/7
2*77
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
7 #.Q
2*: i-.
2 ?.•£>
Flask
Temp
(°F)
£T
/ ""f
7c/
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
/^ 0
C; c,
Flask
Temp
(°F)
r o
'.' /
^^
£?g
4-104
-------
PLANT
LOCATION
DATE Z
TTMC
(£££;
OPERATOR
r/v (-
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG. ) '1*1 <
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F) ^
SAMPLING POINT so
TEST NUMBER
NO SAMPLING DATA
A
Time
.^y
12.53
iw'i
Flask
Number
2->
fo
^
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
;e37
2< x,- D
/-/ v-;T
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
7% -
??^/
•~P, ^
/•r- /
Flask
Temp
(°F)
£5
61
7^
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
#;*
a- o
?-'?
Flask
Temp
(°F)
y-3
73
73
4-105
-------
PLANT
LOCATION
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG. )
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT so
TEST NUMBER x^- i-
OPERATOR
A
NO SAMPLING DATA
Time
,/y-'
/•.^/
/S^6
Flask
Number
fO
Cf'2
tt^
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
~^C"0
Z^5 3
i
-------
PLANT
LOCATION 'f'.
DATE
TIME
AMBIENT PRESSURE (IN. HG. )
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (°F)
SAMPLING POINT ,..
TEST NUMBER
OPERATOR
NO SAMPLING DATA
Time
f <-//<•/
•w
w?
Flask
Number
?A-
-1
it
Flask
Volume
(ml.)
>-, / '
^,
?otef
Initial Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
z.r/?
z«r
Flask
Temp
(°F)
/••*>
->^
7,-s
/ w
Final Conditions
Flask
Vacuum
(in. Hg.)
j /
1.1
"V
Flask
Temp
(°F)
c/V
,r
^7
4-107
-------
SECTION 5
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.1 Fuel Proximate and Ultimate Analyses
5.2 Particulate and Sulfur Oxides Emissions from Method 5/8 Samples
5.3 Particulate Emissions from SASS Samples
5.4 Particulate Emissions and Size Distributions from Andersen Samples
5.5 Sulfur Oxides Emissions from Controlled Condensation System Samples
5.6 Trace Element Analyses of Fuel and SASS Samples
5.7 Organic Analyses of SASS Samples: Total Chromatographable Organics
(TCO), Gravimetric Organics (GRAY), Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry
(GC/MS), and Infrared (IR) Spectra of Total Sample Extracts
5.8 Volatile Organics Analyses of YOST Traps
5.9 NeO Emissions by GC/ECD
5.10 NOX Emissions by EPA Method 7
5-1
-------
5.1 FUEL PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSES
5-2
-------
LABORATORY CERTIFICATE
CURTIS & TOMPKINS, LTD.
ESTABLISHED 1878
Bulk Oil & Chemical Surveyors. Samplers & Weighers
Analytical & Consulting Chemists
SOUTHERN DIVISION
4OI Canal street
'llmington. CA 9O7**-65O3
213-549-674O
29O Division Street
San Francisco, CA 941O3 -4882
415-861-1863
Telex: 171O42
CABLE: ANALYST SFO
FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS
MEMBERS. OFFICIAL CHEMISTS
AND/OR SAMPLERS FOR GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES AND TRADE ORGANIZATIONS
Laboratory No. 8 4 e3 4
Preliminary No. 7758
Reported 5/3/84
Sampled
Received 3/23/84
For
ACUREX CORPORATION
Report on
1 sample of Fuel
Mark Sample No. 901440
Subcontract No. RB59186A
Release No. 13
Prime Contract 62-02-3176
Acurex Project No. 7951
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS
Carbon
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Sulfur (1st test)
Sulfur (2nd test)
Sulfur (3rd test) •
Nitrogen (1st test)
Nitrogen (2nd test)
Nitrogen (3rd test)
PROXIMATE ANALYSIS
Gross Heating Value, BTU per Ib.
Moisture .
Ash
86.2
11.3
0.4
1.00
1.10
1.08
1.04
1.09
1.00
18,430
0.57
0.03
Specific Gravity (API)<§ +60°F
12.6
5-3
-------
5.2 PARTICULATE AND SULFUR OXIDES EMISSIONS FROM METHOD 5/8 SAMPLES
5-4
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Plant CH-6\j/fc,e Performed by
Date £-fa
Sample Location_
Test No./Type /
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
\ / y ~+ 460 I
\
(. »i i M.A* /, (& t>*)^T \
[ 5w«&5W\ I\Q*\ ? %\ 4- ' _' \
11 13'6 )
teisW-feU) + 45° /
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
\ std * Vm std < 1 * I '
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Tb/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
C/y,^ x 0.44) + (2,1 x 0.32) + (??.£.+ x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Mdfl-B } + 18(8 .J. (?fl«r )C\-,et7}'+ 18(/^7^r
Id/0 WO • .... ...
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
Pct,rt (in- H.O) (t^/A )
n i 3i.av.iv u i^a »fA +
Pb ' 13.6 » l^4^9 13.6
'b
Vm std
»'c
vw std
wn
Md
Ms
p
^s
,w
5T.^
*,+*»
e»1->*
r^-vc^
1
«.u
6^-Tift
ixi
* * • t
•
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-5
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity ffos)
/T.avg + 460
O1^ A 0 IT \ A/4P ^ / - -
00.45 (C ) {/APs ) / p „
^ s s
*r , /fetfVZ^ + 460
fl=; an ^,->s \ti TT — ^ /.,.. ,„., . ._ . . .,
05.49 (OLJd/^T) J^rL,^^
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460) (Vw std + Vm std)
* Vs llfc^s - Nd2 t|.^
17.33 (y/kl+ 460)((^«>^) + (t^7^-)
( ->2. )(v-r.?o )(a^,2^ )( .-s^f"
, -, 3G" fti^As
Area of stack (ft2) *= 3.1416
Trr2 -5- 1 44 , JT ( /fr )2---1 44
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - B )Vs A. / 528 \ / Ps \
wo avg , / T^ avg + 4go i f 29.92)
60 (1 -.tff7l)fcC«Ab^/- 528 \ /^2)\
U5Wf.+ 460/ UZ9.92)/
\ / \ /
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15 132 MD(9rams) „ fl,, ( )
Vm-td ( }
Emissiorr rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (QJ C, , 0.00857 ( )( )
- -istd)
Ts
Vs(avg)
0
Nd
%I
AS
QS
r
^c
S(std)
•T
- *>
E
H
^5*6,2.
Hr.*2o
"?2.
•207
/oT.U
7,0&^
^7^
il
• :- iji i '
- - ' \
V
t
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-6
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Plant c.*£ti/*_#JL^ Performed by
Date a-i-S-4-
Sample Location Qgrt.gr
Test No./Type a ; A?-
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
™* ' jv)" tC
17 64 ( l( 13.6 1
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
Vw std + Vm std <*s££.J + (Si^lt3
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(X C02x 0.44) + (X 02x 0.32) + (X N£+ % CO x 0.28)
( x 0.44) + ( x 0.32) + ( + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-Bwo) + 18(BWQ), ( )(1- ) + 18( )
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
Pet^t (in- M) (*•*-.)•
r> x stacA c- I'?f93t+ -»-—*-
pb ' 13.6 ' ^-^^ T3.6
Pb
Vm std
Vlc
vw std
wn
Md
Ms
ps
avzv
«..««
,,vr
d»tD ^ (•
O. 0*7")^
PA'fc.L'iW /pJA-A
^\ "H* Qs «e 4.
*->.2V
X
,«i
>/«
/«
•}
l\
7602/5/81/Rev 1
5-7
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fos)
/T.avg + 460
0=1 AQ (r \ (J~At> \ 1 _. - -
05.40 (Cp) (V4PS } / p „
•(j S S
•^ , /(*"?•/) + 460
nc. An ( -?* ) Ij \ / ____,._„
05.40 (^L)(^^) J(2m)(£L£|r
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Ts + 460)(VW std + Vm std)
e vs ps Nd2
W/ *?.J<1
17.33 (^j + 460) ((^u) + (^.gt^)
( 7^ )(V7/?2_ Jf^?^*! )( ,?o9)z
Area of stack (ft2) *= 3.1416
,rr2 -T- 1 44 , ff ( /y )2-^l 44
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - B )Vs A. 1 528 \ / Ps \
wo avg ^ /Tsavg + 460) (29.92)
60 (1 -.of7jr)todfr«f)/ 528 \ / fet«* \
U-)-7./ + 460/ V(29.92)/
\ / \ '
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15 439 MD(9ranis) ls 432 ( )
Vm-td ( }
Emissiqn rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (QJ C, , 0.00857 ( )( )
' -(std)
Ts
Vs(avg)
B
Nd
XI
AS
QS
r
uc
S(std)
i. .- - - '»
* <1 '
' ED
K
V7%/
v?. sa
72
-3o^
>ot,yy-
7x^^1
*}?<•(-
i
r
7602/5/81/Rev 1
b-8
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample Date:_JhklH.
Requested By:
I.D. Number:
Analytical Method: 6m\/uner(2-if, Ar>giifse.s a
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of: O.nn ? A / £ fe g.
Sample Pate! 2-1 -
Requested By:
I.D. Number:
Analytical Method:
Date of Analysis: ^lt3 ~
. o4 ttVc -Vhcyj 51 ?
Lab I.D. Number
Component
Analytical Result
Unit
Ail
Q
and
b)AH Ic CO/ r'£ctjz.A
Analysis
5-10 Date
v-
Form EED—082 5/81
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample
Requested By: Lrtg-gy V*?>ATT cni^5* % I
Analytical Method:
Date of Analysis:—
"TTrgflTiads O* &Pft $1$ Xtv»?)O6£q.
g* '6 ' o fr
Lab I.D. Number
TEST * i)
^ oi Ml -L
B\AMIL)
Component
DM rots
,o
Analytical Result
3,^33
C 1 ^>O. »
on
Unit
\QO mcj
1C
1*0.01
N, S O.OlOOfJ
-f Tr
Analysis
5-11
Date.
FormEEO-083
-------
5.3 PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS FROM SASS SAMPLES
5-12
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Plant CHcJ/HJ UfA /=r.;~ i'~-'.-Je.L. Performed by
Date /g-*
Sample Location
Test No./Type
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
17.64 /!m\/Pb+^\
\a/\Tm + 460/
l(8a*\ 7&? ) + L£J\
r 61 I ~TIT~
yjL*^)/ \U£_) + 4^o /
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
V1C x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
Vw -td W'^
\ std + vm std (2UJ + (Hiz)
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
(ft,l x 0.44) + (2-7 x 0.32) + ($k+ x 0.28)
.
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-Bwo) + 18(BWQ), (i^iJd-AW) + 18 (£M)
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
r , Pstack «'»• H2°' (J?^, . '— >
'b 13.6 ' (— — ' 13.6
pb
Vm std
Vic
vw std
R
WO
Md
Ms
ps
7K
/??o
fa*7
$ /3 "3>
3a2_
**?
J??J ^
Form 440 3/84
5-13
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fos) • -- ...
/T.avg + 460
R^ Aft (C \ (J~AP \ 1 .-
85.45 (CpJ (V4P$ avgj / p „
*J S S
•V*. /(Jsrt ) + 460
n^ di id bitwJ } / .....
oo.tj ^,>'u;vv ; / • • v ' • • • •
J(?fo )(.»•? )
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Tc + 460)(VU std + Vm std)
o W III
0 Vs Ps Nd2
17.33 (fa + 460)((jty/J + (7^))
( ,"^5 )( ^5,5 )( ^f,S )( Z0.i7/)
Area of stack (ft2) »= 3.1416
jrr 2 -T- 1 44 , * (__ 12-H 44
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - B )V$ A, 7 528 \ / Ps \
wo avg J i T^ ayg + 46Q i i 2g g2 i
60 ( 1 - 6. 13) (£.8 ) (?Pfl )/ 528 \ / & \
H5f, +-460/ V(29.W)7
\^---«* / \ /
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15 432 V9rams> 15 432 < >
Vm,td ( )
Emission rate of particulate matter (Tb/hr)
0.00857 (QJ Cf , 0.00857 ( )(
"istdj
TS
Vs(avg)
0
Nd
%l
AS
"s
r
**c
S(std)
ED
p
^-,'6
K.&
2^3
C.iiS
9&s-
7.^9
1&K
5-14
Form440a 3/34
-------
SASS ANALYTICAL DATA
Sample No.
Sampling Location £ei/y*« £; & _ Run No. /
Recovered By feemft^ Recovery Date 2-/-
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample Date:
Requested By:
I.O. Number:
Analytical Method: 6f&0tfnfl\f'if-
Of A nalycic- ^/ 9
Sft
. Hers a^d
Lab 1.0. Number
Component
Analytical Result
Unit
a ra.™.s
— o. 0000^
O.
O. GOODS'
Y
Analysis
Form EED—082 5/81
-------
5.4 PARTICIPATE EMISSIONS AND SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS FROM ANDERSEN SAMPLES
5-17
-------
ACUREX
cSSn PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS ^J
1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, 68° F, 29.92 inch Hg (scf)
Vm
Vmstack -
2. Stack gas moisture condensed at standard conditions (scf)
Vwstd 0.04707 Vl
Vm(B) c* fr I
/7 /
3. Stack gas proportion of water vapor, by volume
B
wo Vwstd*Vmstd
4. Stack gas dry molecular weight (Ib/lb-mole)
/3.-D 3.0
MWd 0.44 (%CO2) + 0.32 (%O2) + 0.28 (%N2 + %CO)
5. Stack gas molecular weight (Ib/lb-mole)
MW8 = MWd (1 - Bwo) + 18 (Bwo)
6. Pressure stack, in. Hg
3G
5-18
-------
7. Stack gas velocity at stack conditions (ft/sec)
= 85.49 (Cp)
46°
8. Stack gas volume at standard conditions (scfm)
Qs - 60 (1 - Bwo, Vsayg As
Ts>av5g2! 460) (gOg
or Qa 60 Vsavg As (acfm) =
9. Test percent isokinetic
%l
10. Paniculate matter concentration, gr/scf
M^
C. = 15.432
S
std
o.cxC?
M
or Ca 15.432-77—- — (gr/acf) =
vmstack
11. Emission rate of paniculate matter, Ib/hr
ER - 0.00857 (Qs)
&/
12. Percent excess air at sampling point
100 [%O2 - 0.5
% EA =
0.264 %N2 - (%O2 - 0.5 x %CO)
13. Emission rate of paniculate matter, lb/106 Btu
.».**
5-19
-------
ACUREX
Corporation PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, 68° F. 29.92 inch Hg (scf)
AH
Vmstd
2. Stack gas moisture condensed at standard conditions (scf)
Vwstd = 0.04707 Vlc =
3. Stack gas proportion of water vapor, by volume
B.
VwStd
wo - vwstd + Vmstd
4. Stack gas dry molecular weight (Ib/lb-mole)
f?f f J^j?
MWd = 0.44 (%CO2) + 0.32 (%O2) + 0.28 (%N2 + %CO)
c3 G
5. Stack gas molecular weight (Ib/lb-mole)
- Bwo) + 18 (Bwo)
6. Pressure stack, in. Hg
P, =
13.6
5-20
-------
7. Stack gas velocity at stack conditions (ft/sec)
Vs = 85.49 (Cp)
8. Stack gas volume at standard conditions (scfm)
Qs - 60 (1 - Bwo) Vsavg As (T 52*46Q) 4£
\ S,3VQ j \
or Qa 60 Vsavg As (acfm) =
9. Test percent isokinetic
92
10. Particulate matter concentration, gr/scf
M,,
3s = 15'432 Vm
'std
ME
Vmstack
or Ca = 15.432 p (gr/acf) =
11. Emission rate of paniculate matter, Ib/hr
ER = 0.00857 (Q_) C.
12. Percent excess air at sampling point
100 [%O2 - 0.5
% EA =
0.264 %N2 - (%O2 - 0.5 x %CO)
13. Emission rate of particulate matter, lb/106 Btu
E = 2.679 x 10* nT^y - V209^^02
)
5-21
-------
^ACUREX
Corporation
ANDERSEN PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
Plant
Test Location.
Run No /
Flow Rate
Tare Weights:
Final Weights:
,
•/,•.
By.
• nation
STAGE
NO.
FILTER
NO.
FINAL
WT
(g)
TARE
WT
(9)
SAMPLE
WT
(g)a
% OF
TOTAL
WTb
CUMULATIVE
% OF TOTAL
Dp
/, 23
tfCP-
/, 2 1 7CO
/,2f362-
2/
/. 7 /
ii
(5 -
/, 22
Ucp-21%
-7.
«? -CC-935
TOTAL WITH FILTER
TOTAL WITHOUT FILTER
Blank correction value = '
Blank correction value
~ 0.
Stages 0 through 7
Stage F (final filter)
^Includes appropriate blank corection factor.
bCalculations based on total sample weight with filter are entered on first line; calculations based on totali
.sample weight without filter are entered on second line for each stage.
Comments:
5-22
Form EED-070 C 6>79
-------
ACUREX
Corporation
ANDERSEN PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
Plant.
Test Location-
Run No._^—
Tare Weights:
Date _Z/^
Ry
Flow Rate
Location.
/7r
Final Weights:
Date
By-
Location.
STAGE
NO.
FILTER
NO.
FINAL
WT
(9)
TARE
WT
(9)
SAMPLE
WT
(9)a
% OF
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
% OF TOTAL
Dp
/Mo
(/0J-20-1.
775
/til 23 6
/, in 6
5".
5V-
/',
#-00076
(.2-1 / 6 f
£2.
TOTAL WITH FILTER
TOTAL WITHOUT FILTER
IS-
7 -a/^iW
Blank correction value
Blank correction value
Stages 0 through 7
Stage F (final filter)
alncludes appropriate blank corection factor.
''Calculations based on total sample weight with filter are entered on first line; calculations based on total
.sample weight without filter are entered on second line for each stage.
Comments:
5-23
Form EED-070 C 6 79
-------
Corporation
ANDERSEN PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
Plant
Test
Run No
Flow Rate
Tare Weights:
By
I nratinn
'<-i
< /
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample Date: _ 2-~'2.'2.-
-------
5.5 SULFUR OXIDES EMISSIONS FROM CONTROLLED CONDENSATION SYSTEM SAMPLES
5-26
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Plant (X"^t.ff4^t^ c^SffiL / Performed by
Date
Sample Location 5//S-<<
Test No./Type
Barometric Pressure (in
Meter volume (std),
17 54 1 M I ( .
\(/.00) 1 \ ((
• Hg)
«(i)(V*)
»• i)
£U2 + 46° /
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of
Vw std
water vapor
Vw std + Vm std Q£2.) + J&357
Molecular weight, stack
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% CQ2x 0.44) + (% Q2x
( x 0.44) + ( x.
Molecular weight, stack
(Tb/lb-mole)
Absolute stack pressure
p , Pstack gas dry
0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
0.32) + ( + x 0.28)
gas wet
(in. Hg)
oO) ( )
/ \ _i_
""""**,,.' 1^ fi
pb
\i
vm std
Vlc
vw std
wo
Md
Ms
'. •
^7-W
»,n
<^(
j \^~**\
Or* O /
a-i
Fonn44O 3/84
5-27
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Plant (Zb*J«^ (JEEfi. J _ Performed by
Date
Sample Location
Test No. /Type
— J2.
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
"•«m/v^\
\ "/ \Tm + 46° /
/g^/&a* !$*>\
17 fid I .11 ! * J
\$^)/y&J2) + 46° /
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
Vw std , @&
Vw std + Vm std &£^ + %£&
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (X 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
( x 0.44) + ( x 0.32) + ( + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-Bwo) + 18(BWQ), ( )(1- ) + 18( )
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
' Pstack (in" H20) < >
p + szacK e. / . —
Kb 13.6 ' ( ' + T3.6
Pb
Vm std
Vlc
vw std
uin
Md
Ms
>"»
Ps
^.^
.^b.^r
(s6.
Kit
n f^
l*ts'D
1
Form 440 S/84
5-28
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample
Sample Date:
Requested By:
I.D. Number: _
Analytical Method:
/
Dale Of Analysis
3 ~-y'/~~
Lab I.'D. Number
Component
Analytical Result
Unit
/0<7, I
O-
Analysis By—*
5-29
Form EED—082
-------
5.6 TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSES OF FUEL AND SASS SAMPLES
In the following, samples labeled fuel, test 1 and fuel, test 2 are
blind duplicate samples of the same material.
5-30
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 • (312) 953-9300
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Ph.D.
MANAGER
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:
490 ORCHARD ST., GOLDEN, CO 80401
OFFICE TEL. (303) 278-9521
SINCE i*oa
May 16,1984
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94042
RE: IAD #97-P137-116-10
Subcontract #SW59159A
Release #15
Analytical Report
Ten samples were received for analysis on April 2, 1984.
were assigned our IAD identification #97-Pl37-116-10.
These samples
Trace element determinations using Spark Source Mass Spectrometry per
EPA level 1 protocol are reported in separate attached reports.
Arsenic and Antimony were determined on two of the samples using hy-
dride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mercury was deter-
mined on all ten samples using flameless cold vapor atomic absorption spec-
trophotometry. The results of these determinations are presented in Table
No. I and are reported in parts per million (ppm) by weight on an "as re-
ceived" basis.
Carbon and Hydrogen were determined on four samples by an external lab-
oratory. The results of these determinations are presented in Table No. II
and are reported in weight percent (Wt.%) on an "as received" basis.
5-31
OVER 40 BRANCH LABORATORIES STRATEGICALLY ^CATEO IN PRIN^CIPAL COAL MINING AREAS.
TIDEWATER AND GREAT LAKES PORTS, AND RIVER LOADING FACILITIES
Chtrtar Member
-------
Sample ID
901458 EOR Filter
901459 EOR Filter Blank
901454 EOR XAD-2
901475 EOR XAD-2 Blank
901463 EOR Impinger 1
901461 EOR Impinger 1 Blank
901440 EOR Fuel, Test 1
901441 EOR Fuel, Test 2
901464 EOR Impinger 2 and 3
901462 EOR Impinger 2 & 3 Blank
Table No. I
(.ppm by Wt.)
Arsenic (As)
0.012
0.005
Sample ID
901458 EOR Filter
901459 EOR Filter Blank
901440 EOR Fuel, Test 1
901441 EOR Fuel, Test 2
Carbon
Analytical Report
#97-P137-116-10
Page 2
Antimony (Sb)
£0.004
<0.004
* Reported in ppm by weight of the filter.
Table No. II
CWt.%-As Received)
0.14**
0.05**
85.67
85.91
** Reported in weight per cent of the filter.
Hydrogen
0.17**
0.02**
11.22
11.36
Mercury (Hg)
0.04*
£0.02*
0.52
£0.4
0.0031
0.0089
£0.4
£0.4
0.004
<0.002
If you have any questions concerning these results, please call
Harold A. Cohnell
Assistant Laboratory Manager
Robert L. Taylor, Ph.D.,(Jj2lnager
Instrumental Analysis Division
HAC/gh
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
F-466
5-32
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 2IO-B. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release # 15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: 901440 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPEaROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No.: 97-P137-116-70
EOR Fuel
Test 1
ELEMENT CONC.
Urani urn
Thori urn
Bismuth
Lead 0 . 6
Thallium
Mercury MR
Gold
Platinum **i
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR — Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
CONCENTRATION
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europi urn
Samari urn
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.8
Cesium
Iodine 0.5
Tel 1 uri urn
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsem c
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromi urn
*Heterogeneous
**Probable Contamination From
Sample Preparation /^~J
0.7 ppm Approved: \J^-J 1
100 ppm 9n
5-33
CONC. ELEMENT
Vanadium
*2 Titanium
0.09 Scandium
0.2 Calcium
0.06 Potassium
0.2 Chlorine
0.02 Sulfur
0.2 Phosphorus
0.5 Silicon
0.06 Aluminum
Magnesium
0.2 Sodium
2 Fluorine
0.7 Oxygen
6 Nitrogen
0.6 Carbon
10 Boron
0.4 Beryllium
0.4 Lithium
Hydrogen
Ut5t -U'r^E^
U Ac*tf Jptfv'
CONC.
6
3
<0.09
13
5
*MC
MC
4
19
9
8
10
=27
NR
NR
NR
0.2
0.5
NR
%
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release #15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: 901441 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
EOR Fuel
Test 2 CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IADNo.:97-P137-116-10
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 0.5
Thai 1 i urn
Mercury NR
Gold-
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbi urn
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbi urn
Gadolinium
Europi urn
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.3
Cesium
Iodine 0.5
Tel 1 uri urn
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
CONC.
0.3
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.2
0.06
0.4
0.05
£0.02
0.2
2
0.7
20
0.2
5
0:3
0.4
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
2
4
£0.03
5
3
19
MC
2
9
I
5
MC
=4
NR
NR
NR
0;08
<0.01
0.2
NR
STD — Internal Standard
NR — Not Reported
All elements not detected <
AAC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
0.02 ppm
100 ppm
Approved:
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: may 16, 1984
Analyst: 6. Meagher
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A Release 15 Project 7601
Sample No.: 90145'8 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-= 97-P137-116-10
1 8r CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT of the Filter
ELEMENT
Urani urn
Thori urn
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thul i urn
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
STD — Internal
CONC.
1
8
0.2
3
0.4
NR
0.4
2
0.4
1
0.4
2
2
4
Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
Mf Mxinr fnmnonent 5
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbi urn
Gadolinium
Europium
Samari urn
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
0.1 ppm
4000 ocm
0.8
4
0.4
4
12
4
12
16
36
0.4
0.8
3
8
4
STD
0.2
1
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
Os
Approved: ^ C-o
5-35
CONC.
12
0.8
3
24
16
0.8
8
4
16
2
12
64
8
MC
56
MC
20
36
1 ^4-
U*St'
//. 1
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
-€
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFnCES:1919SOUTHHIGHLANDAVE.,SUITE210.B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A Release 15 Project 7601
Sample No.: 9Q1459 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No.:97-P137-116-10
EOR Filter Blank CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT of the Filter
ELEMENT CONC.
Urani urn
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rheni urn
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium 8.
Hoi mi urn
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Bari urn
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected < 0.2 ppm
MC — Major Component >1000 ppm
CONC. ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
0.2 Strontium
0.1 Rubidium
0.2 Bromine
28 Selenium
Arsenic
0.2 Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
STD Nickel
±0.3 Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
Approved: \(-
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: I919SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: 6. Meagher
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release # 15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: 901454 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 'AD No.: 97-P137-116-10
EOR XAD-2
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 0.4
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum *0.6
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samari urn
Neodymi urn
Praseodymi urn
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.9
Cesium
Iodine 0.1
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
*Probable Contamination
Sample Preparation
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
From
CONC.
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.07
0.05
0.08
3
0.4
0.6
0.04
5
0.4
0.4
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryl 1 i urn
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
0.09
4
0.2
17
12
4
6
2
13
1
9
3
*
NR
NR
NR
0.7
0.3
NR
STD — Internal Standard
NR — Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
0.08 ppm
100 ppm
Approved:
5--
/6yU-
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst.- Q. Meagher
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release # 15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: 901475 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-P137-116-10
EOR XAD-2 Blank
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum **0.3
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbi urn
Thul i urn
Erbium
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samari urn
Neodymium
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.5
Cesium
Iodine 0.09
Tel 1 uri urn
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmi urn 0.1
Silver
Palladium
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
CONC. ELEMENT
Vanadium
0.7 Titanium
Scandi urn
0.1 Calcium
Potassium
0.09 Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
0-04 Aluminum
<0.04 Magnesium
0.08 Sodium
O-7 Fluorine
0 - 6 Oxygen
0.5 Nitrogen
£0.07 carbon
6 Boron
0.3 Beryllium
Holmium Rhodium Chromium 0.5 Lithium
*Heterogeneous
Dysprosium **ProBable Contamination From Hydrogen
STD - internal standard Sample Preparation _ ^^^
NR - Not Reported { ) X7 «-rf — ft \^t~,
All element not detected < 0.04 ppm Approved: VVOv • 6-«O< U- • C^2^
MC - Major Component > 100 ppm gh ^^"^ I , . x
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: I919SOUTH HIGHLANOAVE.. SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60)48 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401. PHONE: 303 278-9521
To-. Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release # 15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: XAD-2 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Preparation Reagent Blank CONCENTRAT1ON IN PPAA WE1GHT
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: 6. Meagher
IAD No-= 97-P137-116-10
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium ^0.4
Thorium 0.8
Bismuth
Lead 1
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold **2
Platinum
Iri di urn
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn 0.6
Praseodymi urn 0.4
Cerium 1
Lanthanum 1-
Barium 0.6
Cesium
Iodine 0.06
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmi urn
Silver 0-2
Palladium
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Rhodium Chromium
heterogeneous
**Probable Contamination
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported n n/.
All elementj not detected < «•"* PP1"
MC - Major Component > 100 ppm
INT — Interference
Approved: \^<£&
5-39
CONC.
<0.2
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.02
0.2
4
1
0.6
0.06
18
0.2
0.2
U5t\
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandi urn
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
J^tu^
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET, GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401, PHONE: 303 278-9521
SINCt •»•
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release #15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: 901463 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
EOR
Impinger 1 CONCENTRATION IN yg/mL
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: G. Meagher
IAD No-= 97-P137-116-10
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead 6
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rheni urn
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
INT — Interference
0.008 ug/mL
10 yg/mL
Approve*
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919SOUTH HIGHLANDAVE..SUITE210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION, 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN, COLORADO BW01, PHONE: 303 278-9521
To: Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
zft
P.O. No.: Subcontract SW59159A, Release #15, Project #EE7734.82
Sample No.: 901461 SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
EOR Impinger
1 Blank CONCENTRATION IN
Date: May 16, 1984
Analyst: Q. Meagher
IADNo.:97_pi37_ii6-10
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thori urn
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Luteti urn
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC - Major Component >
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samari urn
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.02
Cesium
Iodine 0.03
Tellurium 0.006
Antimony £0.009
Tin 0.2
Indium STD
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi urn
heterogeneous
0.003 ng/mL
10 yg/mL
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Ni obi urn
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromi urn
Approved: \^O
. .. 11
CONC. ELEMENT
Vanadium
0.03 Titanium
£0.004 Scandium
0.01 Calcium
Potassium
0.003 Chlorine
Sulfur
0.008 Phosphorus
0.006 Silicon
£0.002 Aluminum
£0.002 Magnesium
0.003 sodium
0.02 Fluorine
0.002 oxygen
0.01 Nitrogen
0.004 carbon
0 . 06 Boron
0.01 Beryllium
0.01 Lithium
Hydrogen
/Usfif«c3u^
(\t .. . V LI (]
CONC.
0.003
0.04
0.005
0.4
0.2
*6
MC
1
0.6
0.05
0.7
MC
=0.3
NR
NR
NR
0.002
0.01
NR
Q^
INT — Interference
5-41
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AV6.. SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 6014S • (312) 953-9300
GERALD T SKAR ~SH PLEASE ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO
«.K,.^CD' ^IW 490 ORCHARD ST.. GOLDEN, CO. 80401
MANAGER
.NSTRUMENTAL ANALYS.S D.V.SION
SINCE 1908
August 2, 1984
Mr. Larry Water! and
Acurex Corporation
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
RE: IAD #97-P897-116-06
Subcontract #SW 59159A
Release #16
Analytical Report
Six samples, previously analyzed for trace elements by spark
source mass spectrometry, under our IAD identification #97-P137-116-10,
were logged in under our IAD identification #97-P897-116-06 on July 16,
1984, for additional analysis.
Chlorine and fluorine were determined using specific ion electrode
methodology. Phosphorus was determined colorimetrically.
Depending on sample type and the amount of sample available, sulfur
was determined turbidimetrically or by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
The remaining elemental analysis was performed using flame atomic
absorption/emission spectrophotometry.
The results of these determinations are presented in the following
tables. Samples #1 and 2 are reported in total micrograms (ug) on the
filter. Samples #3 and 4 are reported in micrograms per millilitre
(pg/mL). Samples #5 and 6 are reported in micrograms per gram (yg/g).
All values are reported on an "as received" basis.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please call.
HAC/as
arold A. Connell
Project Coordinator
5_42 Chwtar MimlMr
OVER 40 BRANCH LABORATORIES STRATEGICALLY LOCATED IN PRINCIPAL COAL MINING AREAS.
TIDEWATER AND GREAT LAKES PORTS. AND RIVER LOADING FACILITIES
-------
Table No. I
(Total yg on the Filter)
Parameter
Aluminum, (Al)
Calcium, (Ca)
Chlorine, (Cl)
Iron, (Fe)
Potassium, (K)
Magnesium, (Mg)
Sodium, (Na)
Nickel, (Ni)
Phosphorus, (P)
Sulfur, (S)
Silicon, (Si)
Vanadium, (V)
#1 - 901458
EOR Filter
7,000
16,000
44,300
10,150
80
2,640
1,930
33,100
590
125
780
1,320
#2 901459
EOR Filter Blank
3,740
Table No. II
Parameter
Copper, (Cu)
Fluorine, (F)
Magnesium, (Mg)
Sodium, (Na)
Sulfur, (S)
Zinc, (Zn)
#3 - 901463
EOR Impinger 1
71.9
0.89
0.14
4,960
6,920
30
#4 - 901461
EOR Impinger 1 Blank
0.39
<50
Table No. Ill
Parameter
Chlorine, (Cl)
Sodium, (Na)
Sulfur, (S)
#5 - 901440
EOR Fuel. Test 1
25
132
11,700
#6 - 901441
EOR Fuel, Test 2
21
104
11,600
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
For Your Protection
5-43
-------
5.7 ORGANIC ANALYSES OF SASS SAMPLES: TOTAL CHROMATOGRAPHABLE ORGANICS
(TCO), GRAVIMETRIC ORGANICS (GRAV), GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY
(GC/MS), and INFRARED (IR) SPECTRA OF TOTAL SAMPLE EXTRACTS
5-44
-------
f\ ACUREX
'carbazole, 7, 12-di methyl benzo (a) anthracene,
3-methylcholanthrene, and perylene were sought employing the
computerized library search and manual interpretation. The
assignment and quantitation o-f these organics is tentative since
analytical standards of these compounds were not available for
analysis. Benzo(c)phenanthrene, dibenzo(c,g>carbazole,
7-12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene, 3—methylcholanthrene and perylene
were not detected in any of the samples at levels above 1OO ug
per train.
After extraction of the XAD field blank, the same resin was
spiked with 400 ug each of dodecane and hexadecane for TCO
analysis, 400 ug each of naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene
for PAH analysis, and 10 mg of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate which
combined with the phenanthrene and pyrene for the BRAV analysis.
Results are presented in Tables 1 through 3. Chromatograms and
spectra are attached.
Submitted by:
Greg N/coll Viorica Lopez-Avila, Ph.D.
Manag/ir, Inorganic Chemistry Technical Director
GN/VLA/ats
Attachments
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555. Mountain View. CA 94039 (415)964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
Acurex/ES
8402-006
Page 2 c-f 4
Table 1. TCO and GRAV Results
Samgl.e ID
Filters
XAD*
XAD blank
XAD spike
XAD spike level
XAD spike recovery
TCO
4.1 mg/train
O.34 mg/train
784 ug
BOO ug**
987.
<3 mg/train
6 mg/train
3 mg/train
11 mg
1O.8 mg***
102%
* Blank corrected
** 4OO ug each o-f C(12) and CU6)-alkanes
*** 10 mg o-f bis(2-ethylhexyl )phthalate, 4OO ug of phenanthrene,
and 4OO ug o-f pyrene
5-46
-------
Acurex/ES
8402-OO6
Page 3 o-f 4
Table 2. BC/MS Results, ug/train
Dibutylphthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Other Priority Pollutants
XAD
<50
1OO
4O
<10
20
<10
ND**
% Recovery
ked XAD of sgiked XAD
<5O
60
20
<1O
10
<10
ND
NS***
NS
42O
40O
NS
51O
NS
105
100
128
* Duplicate injection
** ND - Not detected
*** NS - Not spiked
5-47
-------
Acurex/ES
8402-006
Page 4 o-f 4
Table 3. Sample Disposition
Initial Subcontract
901455 #31
901456 #32
901457 #33
901458 #34
901459 #35
901453
9O1454
901475
901442
9O1443
9O1444
901463
901461
901464
9O1462
9O144O
Filter
Filter
Filter
Filter
Filter blank
OMR
XAD
XAD blank
XAD spike
OMC
Imp 1
I mp 1 b 1 an k
I mp 28<3
Imp 2&3 blank
Grab -fuel 1A
395 ml
130 g
130 g
125 g
1910 ml
595 ml_**
1 L
92O mL
1 L
5OO mL
327.
33%
28%
30'/.
10O7.
5 g
5 g
O
10O mL
1OO mL
10O mL
100 mL
100; 100;
100 mL
125 g
125 g
125 g
0
0
0
0
O
627.*
O
87"/.*
877.*
9O7.*
255O mL
1 L
82O mL
1 L
200 mL
* as extract
** Imp 1 8< OMC (aqueous) volume is 2650 mL
5-48
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
8402-006-1 Filters
to-'1)
Intimity
Anignmmt
Comments
No Peaks
5-49
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
8402-006-7 XAD
*~£fi~
2930
1732
1438
1255
1165
1115
t
Intimity
M
S
W
W
W
W
-
Anignmwit ConrnitnB
C-H Aliphatic
C=0
CH
C-0
C-0
C-0
•
..
/~
5-50
-------
R REPORT
SAMPLE:. 8402-006-8 XAD Blank
WaMMmtar
- to-*1)
2928
•
Intraity
S
•
Anignnwnt Comnwnti
C-H Aliphatic
Very weak spectrum
*
•
5-51
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
8402-006-9 XAD Spike
WmMwnfar
- to-'1)
2931
1728
1600
1759
1463
1381
1275
1123
1073
1040
744
t
Invraity
S
S
w
w
M
W
S
M
M
W
W
Anignnwnt Cemnwna
C-H Aliphatic
C=0
C=C Aromatic
C=C Aromatic
C-H Aliphatic
C-H Aliphatic
C-0
C-0
C-0
Unassigned
. CH '
• » •
•
5-52
-------
5.8 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSES OF VOST TRAPS
Inhouse experiments regarding the level of precautions needed to prevent
blank trap contamination during storage and shipping were being performed
during the time period of these tests. As a consequence, six pairs of trap
blanks were available for use in this test: two pairs of trip blanks, two
pairs of field blanks, and two pairs of laboratory blanks, differing only in
the manner in which they were stored. As suggested by the VOST protocol, the
pair t-test was used to assess the "sameness" of each blank trap pair- Use
of this test showed all six blank pairs to be the same, with a confidence
•.
level of 70 percent or greater- Therefore, a mean blank trap level for each
of the volatile compounds determined, with an associated standard deviation,
was used to blank-correct each sample trap analyzed. The concentration of a
compound had to be present in a sample trap at a level greater than three
standard deviations above the mean blank level to be considered actually
present in the flue gas sampled (as suggested by the VOST protocol). Based
on this criterion, only benzene, toluene, and ethyl benzene were found to be
present in sample traps at levels statistically different from blank traps.
Thus, only emissions of these three components are reported in Volume 1 of
this report.
The analytical data report follows. Traps denoted by the suffix "A" are
the Tenax/charcoal trap of a run pair.
5-53
-------
ACUREX
Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/ES (CMEA)
Attention: Larry Waterland/2-2260
March 9, 1984
Acurex ID*: 8402-004
Client POI: 307736.82
302865.65
Page 1 of 5
Subject: Analysis of 10 Pairs of Tenax Traps,
Received 2/2/84
The above referenced samples were Individually analyzed by GC/MS according to
EPA VOST Protocol for volatile organics (EPA Method 624 Priority Pollutants).
Sample Analysis results are listed in Table 1. Blank data and recovery data
from spiked Tenax traps are given in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
If you have any questions, please call.
Prepared by:
(S.
William 6. Hellier
Staff Chemist
Approved by:
Viorica Lopez-Avila, Pn.D.
Technical Director
WGH/VLA/ats
555 Clyde Avenue. P.O. Box 7555. Mountain View. CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 ' Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
5-54
-------
Table 1. Results of Volatile Organic Analyses
]•
' Ol
g"
,
Sample ID
Trap #
Priority Pollutants
Chi oromethane
Dlchloromethane
1 ,1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1 ,2-Oichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
1 ,2-D1chloropropane
Tri chl oroethyl ene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroe thane
Benzene
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Nonprlority Pollutants
Xylenes
Detection Limit
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Tol uene-dg
Concentration (ng/trap)
Run #4
7a
302
137
ND
2
28
3
9
77
4
8
29
63
5
47
67
10
8
11
2
65
Run #4
33Aa
4900
2670
ND
ND
ND
ND
19
ND
ND
3
ND
35
ND
ND
42
ND
6
9
2
86
Field
Blank
40a
2260
550
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
7
ND
2
4
2
13C
Field
Blank
7Aa
27
3050
ND
ND
ND
ND
7
ND
ND
12
ND
38
ND
ND
35
ND
29
30
2
146
Trip
Blank
42a
523
396
ND
ND
ND
ND
9
12
ND
11
30
38
ND
ND
29
ND
ND
8
2
219
Trip
Blank
15Aa
58
4160
8
ND
12
24
ND
8
22
ND
29
51
ND
10
16
12
ND
15
2
100
Run §2
23
960
103
ND
ND
24
ND
8
ND
4
ND
ND
850
' ND
ND
33
ND
1
7
1
79
Run n
24Ab
87
933
6
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
34
ND
6
52
4
ND
10
1
136
Lab
Blank
8
290
115
ND
ND
35
ND
7
ND
ND
ND
ND
14
ND
ND
13
ND
1
5
1
80
Lab
Blank
10A
53
225
ND
3
ND
ND
3
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
. 52
ND
ND
15
1
107
a - Shipped in wooden boxes
b - Transport tube received broken
c - Low recovery of Internal standards
ND - Not detected
-o oo S»
a> 4> o
to o c
CD IS) "J
i m
ro o x
o ^
o 4* m
HI «/>
in
-------
Table 1. Results of Volatile Organic Analyses (Cont.)
Sample ID
Trap #
Priority Pollutants
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Dichloromethane
l,l-D1chloroethylene
Trans- 1 ,2-D1chloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-Dlchloroethane
1,1.,1-Trlchloroethane
Carbon Tetrachlorlde
1.2-Dlchloropropane
TMchloroethylene
1,1,2-THchloroethane
Benzene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Manor tor 1ty Pollutants
Styrene
Xy lanes
'Detection Limit
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Toluene-dg
Concentration (ng/trap)
Glass
Sealed
44
830
NO
120
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
19
ND
ND
10
3
1
2
1
108
Glass
Sealed
20A
37
ND
121
10
ND
ND
12
15
8
ND
ND
ND
5
17
8
42
9
ND
ND
1
134
Run #1
45
519
ND
109
ND
ND
24
8
30
ND
27
8
ND
2640
11
ND
144
9
2
8
2
91
Run #1
19A
146
9
25200
3
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
17
6
54
ND
32
ND
2
72
6
ND
2
21 3C
Run #3
21a,b
2240
ND
63
ND
ND
ND
ND
8
46
ND
ND
ND
205
ND
ND
57
4
ND
6
2
95
Run #3
13b
66
ND
889
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
46
21
ND
34
5
ND
10
2
142
Field
Blank
11
721
ND
115
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
26
ND
ND
2
ND
ND
4
2
111
Field
Blank
32A
28
ND
1550
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
1
4
3
2
2
ND
7
2
103
Trip
Blank
9
1340
ND
118
22
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
9
4
3
3
•\
2
106
Trip
Blank
35A
71
ND
204
ND
ND
3
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
41
ND
8
44
7
6
9
2
142
a - Transport tube received broken
b -Transported with activated charcoal
c - Low recovery of internal standards
ND - Not Detected
-a oo j»
01 4*0
to oc
i n
w o x^
o *» m
-h to
-------
Table 2. Analysis Blanks
Sample ID
Date
Priority Pollutants
Chloromethane
D1 chl or ome thane
1,1-Dtchloroethylene
1 ,2-D1chloroethane
1 ,1 ,l-Tr1chloroethane
Trtchloroethylene
Chl orodl bromomethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Nonprlorlty Pollutants
Styrene
Xylenes
Detection Limit
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Tol uene-dg
Concentration (ng/Trap)
Purge
Blank
2/2/84
70
78
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
ND
18
2
6
4
ND
3
3
4
2
100
Trap
Blank
2/2/84
286
60
14
7
59
23
ND
10
41
3
13
12
ND
3
2
5
2
95
Purge
Blank
2/3/84
4
(81
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
14
ND
ND
3
ND
3
ND
5
2
93
Trap
Blank
2/3/84
315
68
ND
ND
ND
2
ND
6
18
21
23
10
7
8
7
9
2
91
Purge
Blank
2/5/84
17
49
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
ND •
5
ND
1
ND
ND
2
96
Trap
Blank
2/5/84
2130
62
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
24
26
ND
41
12
ND
9
3
ND
2
102
Purge
Blank
2/6/84
63
115
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
52
2
104
Trap
Blank
2/6/84
64
59
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
19
ND
ND
12
ND
7
10
10
2
109
en
en
ND - Not detected
•o oo >»
e> -P» o
iO O C
n> ro -j
m
en
-------
Table 3. Tenax Trap Spike Recovery
Acurex/ES
8402-004
Page 5 of 5
Sample ID
Date
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Dichloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1 ,1-Di Chloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Di Chloroethane
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Dichlorobromomethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trichl oroethylene
1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benrsne
Tetrachl oroethyl ene
Tol uene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Nonpriority Pollutants
Xylenes
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Tol uene-dg
% Recovery
200 ng
Trap
2/2/84
404
116
112
116
116
131
128
130
130
54
118
118
100
93
"90
39
118
100
106
66
85
66
104
200 ng
Trap
2/3/84
615
160
163
170
136
171
161
170
154
87
158
161
95
65
66
54
96
,78
67
31
38
42
72
200 ng
Trap
2/5/84
338
114
117
100
109
112
114
114
no
82
108
no
91
96
101
113
138
102
no
68
81
54
105
200 ng
Trap
2/6/84
49
90
74
70
106
73
84
78
88
70
78
60
68
139
111
58
152
84
91
43
44
54
95
5-58
-------
5.9 N20 EMISSIONS BY GC/ECD
5-59
-------
ACUREX.
Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/ES
Attention: Larry Water!and
May 21, 1984
Acurex ID#: 8404-025
Client P0#: 307736.82
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Analysis of 3 Gas Bombs for Nitrous Oxide by 6C/ECD
The above referenced samples were analyzed by GC/ECD according to previously
reported method.
Results are listed in the table below:
Sample ID
(ppm)
901428
901448
901470
<0.5*
2
n
* Sample cylinder was not pressurized
sample may have leaked.
If you have any questions, please call.
Prepared by:
William G. HelTier
Staff Chemist
Approved by:
Viorica Lopez-Avila, Ph.D.
Technical Director
WGH/VLA/ats
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View. CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
5-60
-------
5.10 NOX EMISSIONS BY EPA METHOD 7
Laboratory analysis data for the Method 7 test performed on
January 24, 1984, was Included on the forms reporting the sampling and
recovery data included in Section 4.2. Analysis data for the tests performed
on February 8 and 24, 1984, appear on the following pages.
5-61
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample
»f. Cfl&l/G&Z
Sample Date:.
/
2-
Requested By:
I.D. Number
Analytical Method:
Date of Analysis:—
*7
A) * L ^
: ^A
Lab l.D. Number
Analytical Result
Unrt
r
7
2,2.^,0
it
37 1
/
1*3,2
5-62
Analysts By.
Date
U-i3
FarmEEO-M?
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample Date;_Z__r_
Requested By: <*?/»"*}
I.D. Number
Analytical Method:
/
Date Of Anatysis-
"
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample
M. C/l&l/eeK
Sample Date:.
Requested By:
I.D. Number
? 77S 5s
Analytical
Date of Analyst
I Unit
LMJ/J^/
\ /
Lab I.O. Number
Analyt
cal Result
J"
7
/o
/J/,
73,
Analysis By.
5-64
Date.
^
^
*/*
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Inunctions on the reverse before completing}
• REPORT NO.
EPA-600/7-86-013b
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
.TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Environmental Assessment of an Enhanced Oil
Recovery Steam Generator Equipped with an EPA
Heavy-oil Low-NOx Burner; Volume II*
6. REPORT OAT6
April 1986
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S) "
C. Castaldini, L. R. Water-land, and R. De Rosier
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Acurex Corporation
Energy and Environmental Division
P. O. Box 7044
Mountain View, California 94039
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3188
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final; 1/84 - 1/85
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
is. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES AKERL prO|ject officer is Joseph A. McSorley, Mail Drop 65. 919 /
541-2920. Volume I contains technical results. (*) Volume II is Data Supplement.
ID. ABSTRACT
The report gives results of comprehensive emission measurements and
30-day flue gas monitoring on a 16-MW (55 million Btu/hr) enhanced oil recovery
steam generator equipped with the EPA low-NOx burner firing high-nitrogen crude.
The 1-day comprehensive measurements included quantification of semivolatile or-
ganics and 73 trace elements; volatile organic sampling train quantisation of volatile
organic priority pollutants; EPA Method 5/8 for particulate and SOx; controlled con-
densation for SOx; Andersen impactors for particle size distribution; grab samples
for N2O; and continuous flue gas monitoring. NOx emissions averaged 70 ppm at 3%
O2, well below the target of 85 ppm. CO emissions were below 30 ppm/ and SO2
averaged about 550 ppm. Solid particulates were emitted at about 27 ng/J (96 mg/
dscm); condensible particulates were about half that. Volatile organics (benzene,
toluene, and ethylbenzene) were measured in the 0.4 to 20 ppb range. Semivolatile
organics (naphthalene and phenol) were detected at about 0.3 ppb. Subsequent contin-
uous monitoring of flue gas criteria emissions showed NOx below 80 ppm at 3% O2
with an average of 70 ppm. CO emissions were generally less than 30 ppm.
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lOENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Pollution
Assessments
Boilers
Oil Recovery
Crude Oil
Combustion
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Environmental Assess-
ment
Low-NOx Burners
13B
14B
ISA
081,11H
21B
3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclass ified
21..NO. OF PAGES
187~
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
CPA Form 2320-1 («-73J
5-65
-------