United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Ml 48105
EPA-460/3-80-003
Air
v»EPA
Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust
Emissions from Malfunctioning Non-
Catalyst and Oxidation Catalyst
Gasoline Automobiles
-------
EPA-460/3-80-003
REGULATED AND UNREGULATED
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM MALFUNC-
TIONING NON-CATALYST AND OXIDATION
CATALYST GASOLINE AUTOMOBILES
by
Charles Urban
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas
78284
Contract No. 68-03-2499
EPA Project Officer: Robert J. Garbe
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
January 1980
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report technical data of
interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are available free of charge to Federal
employees, current contractors and grantees, and nonprofit organization - in limited
quantities - from the Library Services Office (MD-35), Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information Service, 5285
Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by Southwest Re-
search Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas, in fulfillment of Contract
No. 68-03-2499. The contents of this report are reproduced herein as received from
Southwest Research Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are
those of the author and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency. Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as an en-
dorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-80-003
-------
ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions from non-catalyst and oxidation catalyst-
equipped gasoline automobiles operating under malfunction conditions. One
non-catalyst and four catalyst-equipped automobiles were evaluated over three
driving schedules in the unmodified and in four engine and/or emission con-
trol system malfunction configurations. Exhaust emission constituents
measured, in addition to the currently regulated emissions, include: parti-
culates, sulfates, aldehydes, sulfides, amines, metals and several additional
elements and compounds.
111
-------
FOREWORD
This project was initiated by the Technology Assessment and Evaluation
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48105. The engineering and analytical effort on which this report
is based was accomplished by the Department of Emissions Research of South-
west Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284. This
project, authorized by Contract 68-03-2499, was initiated on December 6, 1976
and was completed April 6, 1979.
The SwRI Project Leader was Mr. Charles Urban who supervised all vehicle
testing, data analyses and reporting. Mr. Harry Dietzmann was in charge of
all unregulated emissions procedural development related activities that were
involved in this project. Mr. Karl Springer was Project Manager and was in-
volved in the initial technical and fiscal negotiations and all subsequent
major project decisions.
The Project Officer throughout the entire project was Mr. Robert Garbe
of the Technology Assessment and Evaluation Branch, Environmental Protection
Agency. Mr. Garbe played an active part in all major project areas. Dr.
Ronald Bradow and members of his staff, of the the Environmental Protection
Agency at Research Triangle Park in North Carolina, provided considerable
technical and other support relative to the analyses of the unregulated
emissions.
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ill
FOREWORD iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
SUMMARY ix
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Project Objective 1
B. Emissions Measurement Procedure 1
C. Vehicles Evaluated 2
D. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated 2
E. Vehicle Testing 2
F. Project Reviews 2
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATION AND PROCEDURES 4
A. Vehicles 4
B. Fuel and Lubricant 4
C. Dynamometer and CVS System 8
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis 8
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions and Engine
Parameters 8
F. Emissions Test and Mileage Accumulation Procedures 12
G. Test Numbering System 14
H. Computational Methods 19
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS 20
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures 20
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical Procedures 24
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedure 25
IV. TASK 1 - MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS 29
A. Selection of Malfunction Conditions 29
B. Test Plan, Car and Parameters for Task 1 Evaluations 34
C. Task 1 Results 34
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd.)
Page
D. Analyses of the Task 1 Data 40
V. VEHICLE TESTING 43
A. Test Matrix 43
B. Test Results 43
C. Other Test Analyses and Evaluations 45
VI. ANALYTIS OF THE RESULTS 50
A. Average Values for the Unmodified Configuration 50
B. Average Values for the Malfunction Configuration 50
C. Analyses of Regulated Emissions and Fuel Consumption 52
D. General Effects of Malfunctions on Emissions 54
E. Metals and DMNA 55
F. Maximum Emission Values 59
G. Relative Importance of the Maximum Emission Rates 59
LIST OF REFERENCES 69
APPENDICES
A. General Information
B. Task I Malfunction Screening Evaluations
C. Summaries of the Results
D. FTP Individual Sample Emissions Results
E. Computer Printouts of the Test Results
F. Average Values for the Unmodified Configuration
G. Average Values for all Configurations
VI
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Representative views of automobiles evaluated. 6
2 Gasoline engine emissions sampling system. 9
3 Dimensional schematic of dilution tunnel. 10
4 Views of the emissions sampling system 11
5 Driving cycle speed vs time traces. 18
VII
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Tables Page
1 Automobiles Evaluated 5
2 Description of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 Unleaded Gasoline 7
3 Test Sequence for Each Malfunction 15
4 Laboratory Test Sequence 16
5 Summary of Driving Schedule Parameters 17
6 Sampling and Analysis Methodology for Unregulated
Emissions 21
7 Procedural Validation and Qualification 26
8 Emission Procedural Sample Rates and Accuracy 27
9 Task Plan for Malfunction Screening Evaluations 35
10 Summary of the Task 1 Composite FTP Results 37
11 Summary of Malfunction Conditions Tested 44
12 Idle Emissions During FTP Cycle 48
13 Average Values for Unmodified Configuration 51
14 Summary of Average FTP Regulated Emissions and Fuel
Consumption Data 53
15 Relationship of Malfunction to Unmodified Emission Results 55
16 Illustrative Summary of the Elemental Analyses for the FTP 57
17 Estimated Levels of DMNA in FTP Tests 58
18 Highest of the Averaged Emission Rates 60
19 Maximum Emission Levels in the Undiluted Exhaust 65
20 Relative Importance of Malfunction Emission Rates 67
VI11
-------
SUMMARY
The major objective of this project was to evaluate the effects of mal-
function conditions on exhaust emissions from a non-catalyst and oxidation
catalyst-equipped gasoline automobiles. These evaluations involved analyzing
the exhaust for many unregulated compounds and elements in addition to the
currently regulated emissions.
This study involved five mid-size automobiles built by three of the
American manufacturers. One of the automobiles was a 1977 model with a
six cylinder engine which did not have a catalytic converter. The other
four were 1978 models with V—8 engines and oxidation catalytic converters.
The 1977 model and two of the four 1978 models had supplementary air in-
jection into the exhaust manifold.
Following final selection of the malfunction conditions, each of the
five automobiles was evaluated in the unmodified and in four different
malfunction configurations. Malfunction conditions evaluated included:
rich fuel-to-air ratio at idle, ignition misfire, disabled EGR, and either
idle with the air pump disconnected or high oil consumption. With each
automobile, a total of four evaluations were conducted in the unmodified
configuration and two evaluations were conducted in each of four malfunction
configuration.
Unregulated emission compounds measured included: sulfates, particu-
lates, metals and other elements, aldehydes, cyanides, sulfides, organic
amines, nickel carbonyl, n-nitrosodimethylamine, ammonia and nitrous oxide.
A number of the analytical procedures for these compounds were developed
specifically for use in this and several other related projects.
The three test sequences involved in this project were the light-duty
Federal Test Procedure (FTP), the congested freeway driving schedule and
the highway fuel economy driving schedule. The basic requirements specified
in the Code of Federal Regulations for certification of light-duty vehicles
were followed for all three of these driving schedules.
A significant data base for both regulated and unregulated emissions
was generated in this project. To facilitate their review and usage, these
data were analyzed to the extent applicable and are presented in several
different formats in this report. Highest values detected, for all cars
operating under all test cycles and all malfunctions, are summarized as
follows:
IX
-------
Maximum Emission Rate , mg/km
Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide3
Oxides of Nitrogena
Total Participates3
Sulfate
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Non-Catalyst
Unmod .
730
11,100
1,200
31
0.7
17
0.2
<0.1
3
2.4
0.1
0.00
4
Malf.
10,800
24,700
2,300
48
1.3
228
0.4
0.2
3
7.1
0.5
0.00
4
Oxi . -Catalyst
Unmod.
320
5,500
1,200
8
8
3
0.5
<0.1
5
0.6
0.1
0.00
41
Malf.
2,300
52,900
4,200
18
17
13
2.1
0.1
57
6.2
4.3
0.00
70
Values for the FTP are given for the three regulated emissions and total
particulates. For HC, CO and total particulates, the FTP values were the
maximum values.
x
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This report describes the effort to characterize regulated and unregu-
lated exhaust emissions from non-catalyst and catalyst-equipped light-duty
gasoline vehicles operating in the unmodified and under malfunction condi-
tions. This is the first project to be completed from among several related
projects at SwRI involving the evaluation of a large number of unregulated
emissions from gasoline automobiles.
A. Project Objective
The major objective of this project was to evaluate the effects of
engine malfunction conditions on exhaust emissions from a non-catalyst and
from oxidation catalyst-equipped automobiles. Emissions evaluated included
the three currently regulated emissions (HC, CO and NOX) along with a signi-
ficant number of currently unregulated compounds (e.g., sulfates, sulfides,
aldehydes, amines, etc.).
B. Emissions Measurement Procedure
The emissions measurement procedures utilized in this project ranged
from those procedures routinely used (HC, CO, NOX/ sulfate, etc.) to pro-
cedures that required considerable research and experimentation before they
became operational (organic sulfides, amines, etc.). The compounds or com-
pound groups evaluated, along with the sampling method used, were as follows:
Sampling
Method Compounds Evaluated
Bag HC, CO, NOX, CO2, Individual HC, Nitrous Oxide and Nickel
Carbonyl
Filter Sulfates, Particulates, Metals and other Elements
Impinger Cyanides, Aldehydes, Hydrogen Sulfide, Ammonia and Organic
Amines
Trap Carbonyl Sulfide, Organic Sulfides and DMNA
A number of the procedures for measuring unregulated emissions were deve-
loped in another project and reported in an interim report. '
Superscript numbers in parenthesis designate references at end of report.
-------
C. Vehicles Evaluated
Five automobiles were utilized in this project; four with and one with-
out an oxidation catalytic converter. Included were a 1977 AMC Pacer, two
1978 Chevrolet Malibus (one certified for sale in California), a 1978 Ford
Granada and a 1978 Ford Mustang II. The two Chevrolet Malibus had pelleted
catalysts and the two Ford automobiles had monolithic catalysts. The AMC
Pacer did not have a catalyst.
D. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated
The automobiles were evaluated in the unmodified configuration (i.e.,
tuned-up to manufacturer's specifications) and under various malfunction
conditions. Potential malfunction conditions for this project were identi-
fied by the EPA Project Officer after an extensive examination of available
data on malfunction conditions. A series of tests using a representative
vehicle was then conducted to identify the "best" malfunction candidates
for use in this project. Conditions considered were: rich operation, use
of leaded fuel, engine misfire, EGR failure, air pump failure, high lubri-
cant consumption, ignition timing advance and retard, and various combina-
tions. With the exception of the use of leaded fuel, all the preceding
individual malfunction conditions were evaluated in either the malfunction
screening or the vehicle testing phases of this project. Leaded fuel, al-
though a condition of concern, was not evaluated due to lack of emission
measurement methods for halogen compounds at the time this project was
initiated.
E. Vehicle Testing
Each of the five vehicles was tested in the unmodified configuration
(i.e., tuned-up to manufacturer's specifications) and in each of four mal-
function conditions. The test sequence included the Light-Duty Federal Test
Procedure, ^ ' the Congested Freeway Driving Schedule^) an(j the Highway Fuel
Economy Driving Schedule.(4) Preconditioning of the vehicle prior to testing
was conducted in accordance with the 55 mph Alternate Mileage Accumulation
Procedure.^' To the extent practical, all specified unregulated exhaust
constituents were sampled and analyzed during every test.
F. Project Reviews
A number of meetings, discussions, and reviews were held during the
course of this project with the Project Officer and the other individuals
at EPA involved in this or related projects. This project is the first to
be completed out of the several projects being conducted at this laboratory
which involve extensive measurements of unregulated emissions from gasoline
powered vehicles. The primary project planning meeting was held as SwRI
on March 22 and 23, 1977. Attendance at the March meeting included:
Mr. Robert Garbe and Dr. Joseph Somers from the EPA and Mr. Charles Urban,
Mr. Harry Dietzmann and Mr. Karl Springer from SwRI. Significant modifica-
tions to the original scope of work were discussed during this meeting. A
meeting was held at SwRI on July 14 and 15, 1977, to coordinate the various
project efforts involving measurement of unregulated emissions. In atten-
-------
dance at this meeting were: Dr. Joseph Somers, Mr. Ralph Stahman and
Mr. Jack Wagman from the EPA-AA, Dr. Ronald Bradow and Mr. Frank Black
from the EPA-RTP, and Messrs. Karl Springer, Charles Hare, Harry Dietzmann,
Sherrill Martin and Charles Urban from SwRI. A projects status review
meeting was held at SwRI on December 7, 1977 with representatives from SwRI,
EPA-AA, EPA-RTP and EPA-Washington in attendance.
-------
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATION AND PROCEDURES
This section describes the vehicles, the fuel and lubricant, the facil-
ities and the general instrumentation and procedures utilized in this pro-
ject. The overall sampling systems for the unregulated emissions are also
discussed,
A. Vehicles
Five new gasoline powered automobiles were evaluated in this project.
All five automobiles (cars) are described in Table land three of the five
are shown in Figure 1. The 1977 AMC Pacer was the only one of the five cars
which did not use an oxidation catalytic converter (catalyst). As a matter
of fact, two AMC models using the 258/6 engine were the only domestically
produced gasoline automobiles in 1977 which did not use a catalyst.
The five cars were obtained through standard lease agreements and came
equipped with the normally obtained options; such as automatic transmission,
power steering and brakes, and steel radial tires. Assurance was also made
that these automobiles came equipped with the standard rear-axle ratio and
standard size tires.
Difficulties were initially encountered with the Ford Granada. Upon
receipt, it had unacceptable surging during normal operation. The primary
cause was diagnosed as being due to a defective EGR valve. The Service
Advisor at the local San Antonio Ford dealer said the EGR valve would have
to be special ordered and would take a couple of weeks to get. It ended
up taking almost a month to get the EGR valve and return of the Granada.
With the tune-up and repair performed, the Granada operated satisfactorily.
No further engine or emission control difficulties were encountered with any
of the five automobiles evaluated.
B. Fuel and Lubricant
Throughout this project a single batch of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 unleaded
gasoline, type provided to auto manufacturers for emissions durability tests,
was used for all testing. This gasoline, described in Table 2, was made in
accordance with the specifications outlined in MSAPC Advisory Circular No.
A/C 26B1 and contained no measurable manganese. The hydrogen to carbon ratio
was 1.89 and the SwRI identification number was EM-344.
The engine lubricant used throughout this project was Exxon Uniflow
10W40 motor oil. This motor oil, in addition to having a significant sales
volume, contained an additive for reducing engine friction. Indications
at the time were that many or most major motor oil manufacturers were planning
to incorporate friction additives into their motor oils.
-------
TABLE 1. AUTOMOBILES EVALUATED
Project
Car
Number
11
12
13
14
15
Vehicle
Year
1977
1978
1978
1978
1978
Make
AMC
Chev.
Chev.
Ford
Ford
Model
Pacer
Malibu
Malibu (Cal)
Granada
Mustang II
Body
Type
2-dr
2-dr
2-dr
4-dr
2-dr
ID or
Serial Number
A7C667 C233194
1W27U8R416330
1W27U8Z434207
8W82F117400
8F02F187610
GVWR,
1962
2040
2052
2101
1857
Project.
Car
Number
11
12
13
14
15
Emission Controls
Engine
CID/Cyl
258/6
305/8
305/8
302/8
302/8
Family
1-2
810Y2
810Y2V
302 "A
302 "D
8BCV
8BCV
" (1x95)
11 (1x95)
Oxidation
Catalyst
None
Pelleted
Pelleted
Monolith
Monolith
Air
Pump
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
EGR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Project
Car
Number
11
12
13
14
15
Note:
Chassis Dynamometer Settings5
Inertia,
Kilograms
1590
1590
1590
1810
1590
Power,
Kilowatts
9.2
8.0
8.0
9.8
9.2
Inertia,
Pounds
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
Power,
Horsepower*3
12.3
10.7
10.7
13.2
12.3
All five automobiles were equipped with:
. Automatic Transmission
. Power Steering and Brakes
. Air Conditioning
. Steel-Belted Radial Tires
Same as settings used in EPA certification of each automobile, except for
the Granada.
Includes the increase for air conditioning.
-------
1977 AMC Pacer
1978 Ford Granada
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
Figure 1. Representative views of automobiles evaluated.
-------
TABLE 2. DESCRIPTION OF CHEVRON UL-CQ26B1 UNLEADED GASOLINE
Availability Date
Tank No.
Gallons
Gravity, "API at 60°F
Research Octane No.
Motor Octane No.
Sensitivity
Lead, g/Gal.
Sulfur, Wt %
Phosphorus, g/Gal
Manganese, g/Gal.
Gum, mg/100 m£
Unwashed
Washed
Reid Vapor Pressure, psi
Distillation, °F
(% Evaporated)
IBP
10%
50%
90%
EP
Recovery, %
Residue, %
Loss, %
Acidity of Residue
Hydrocarbons, Vol %
Aromatics
Olefins
Saturates
Benzene, Vol %
Water and Sediment, Vol %
Oxidation Stability, Hr.
Copper Corrosion
Test Method
ASTM D 1298
ASTM D 2699
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 3237
X-Ray - ASTM
D 2622 (Modified)
ASTM D 3231
EAM 128-74
ASTM D 381
ASTM D 323
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 1093
ASTM D 1319
Chevron Research
Technique
ASTM D 2709
ASTM D 525
ASTM D 130
April 24, 1978
94
801,901
58.4
91.6
83.2
8.4
0.001
0.029
0.0002
0.001
85
0
8.9
97
129
212
328
386
97.5
1.0
1.5
Pass
28
8
64
2.0
<0.001
24+
1A
Note: These inspection data were provided by the Chevron Research Company.
-------
C. Dynamometer and CVS System
A Clayton Model ECE-50 chassis dynamometer with a belt-driven variable-
inertia flywheel system, was utilized for all transient testing. The belt-
driven inertia system simulated equivalent weight of vehicles from 680 kg
(1500 Ibs) to 2495 kg (5500 Ibs) in 115 kg (250 Ibs) increments to 1360 kg
and 225 kg increments about 1360 kg.
The constant volume sampler (CVS) used for these evaluations was SwRI
CVS Number 2. This unit has a nominal capacity of 9.2 m3/min (325 cfm). A
nominal 200 mm (8 inch) diameter by 3 m (10 feet) long dilution tunnel was
used between the intake filter and the CVS to enable sampling of sulfate and
particulate.
Partial views of the chassis dynamometer, the dilution tunnel and the
intake to the CVS can be seen in previous Figure 1 and subsequent Figure 4.
Both the dynamometer and the CVS were calibrated, maintained and operated
in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and the appropriate sec-
tions of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.^)
In addition to the 142 mVmin (5000 cfm) cooling fan placed in front of
the automobiles, 42 m /min (1500 cfm) blowers were available to cool each
rear wheel and to blow the heat from the exhaust pipe away from the auto-
mobiles gasoline tank. These additional blowers were used only during the
SET and HFET driving cycles.
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis
A pictorial schematic of the exhaust and sampling system is shown in
Figure 2 with dimensional details given in Figure 3. This system is in
accordance with the guidelines established in various projects conducted
at SwRI for the EPA. The major difference between this system and similar
systems used in other projects is the number of sampling probes and systems
required to collect all of the required unregulated emission samples. This
is illustrated in the several views of the system shown in Figure 4. view
A shows an overall view of the entire system in operation during an actual
test. View B shows the system used to continuously record the dilute HC,
CO, NOX and CO2/ the 02 in the raw exhaust and the catalyst temperature.
View C shows a significant portion of the sampling systems for the unregu-
lated emissions. View D provides another view of the overall set-up with
operators in place as required to operate all of the sampling systems. The
various sampling systems are numbered on Views C and D and are identified
beside these views.
This section has described the dilution tunnel and provided some insight
into the overall sampling system assembly. More detailes on each of the in-
dividual sampling systems for unregulated emissions are given in Section III
of this final report.
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions and Engine Parameters
Bagged samples of the dilute exhaust were evaluated for HC, CO, NOX and
8
-------
Exhaust
Out
(Bags)
HC, CO, NOX, CO2,
Individual HC
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
AP Control
Orifice
CVS
Constant
Volume
Sampler
(Filters)
Particulate
Sulfate (BCA)
Metals and Other Elements
Filtered
Air In
210 mm (8.4")I.D.
Orifice Mixing
Plate
Oxygen <•=
(Traps and Impingers)
DMNA
COS + Sulfides
HCN
Ammines
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Hydrogen Sulfide
t
Exhaust
from
Automobile
Figure 2. Gasoline engine emissions sampling system.
-------
— 3050mm (10')
610mm
400mm
Swagelok 1/2 NPT
to 3/8 tubing
1/2 NPT Coupling-SS
From
Filter
Box
8" Dia Sch 5, SS Pipe
9.52mm (0.375") O.D. Probe
Neoprene Gasket
Diameter as Required for
Connection to CVS - 100mm I.D. Norn.
Orifice as Specified Differential
Pressure
230mm —+•
460mm >-
50mm (2") Dia Exhaust Elbow
_A
Figure 3. Dimensional schematic of dilution tunnel.
-------
A. Entire Sctmpling System
i
7 8
f- DLL*
B. Regulated Emissions
1. HC Oven
2. CVS Filter Box
3. Dilution Tunnel
4. Particulates
5. Organic Sulfides
6. DMNA
7. Organic Amines, Ammonia,
Aldehydes, Hydrogen
Sulfide, Cyanides Sample
8. Amines, NH^, Aldehydes,
H2S, CN~ Background
C. Unregulated Emissions
D. En tiro, sampling System
Figure 4. Views of the emissions sampling system
11
-------
CO2 using SwRI Bag Cart Number 1. This bag cart was designed, calibrated
and operated in accordance with the appropriate sections of the Code of
Federal Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.(2)
In addition, the levels of dilute HC, CO, NOX and CC>2 were recorded
continuously on a strip chart recorder. These dilute emissions are auto-
matically engine exhaust flow-weighted, and provide a better insight into
variability of mass emissions during cyclic procedures than would be pro-
vided by continuous direct emission measurement. Other items continuously
recorded were the vehicle speed, the oxygen level in the undiluted exhaust
and the catalyst exit temperature. The instrumentation used for these con-
tinuously recorded data were as follows:
Parameter
Measured
HC
CO
NOX
C02
02
Temp.
Speed
Instrument or Method
Type
FID
NDIR
CL
NDIR
Polorographic
Make & Model Ranges Used
SwRI No. 007 100 through 3200 ppm
Beckman 315B 0.3, 0.6 & 1.5%
Thermo Electron 12A 100 & 1000 ppm
Beckman 315 B 6%
Beckman 715 5 & 25%
Parallel output from the Dynamometer Controls
These continuously recorded data were used for obtaining the catalyst
maximum temperature and in helping to resolve any problems or questions
occurring with the other test data. In addition, these data remain available
in the event they may be useful in clarifying future findings.
The catalyst average temperature and the average oxygen level in the
undiluted exhaust were obtained using Acromag 1324-LY-l integrators. The
average oxygen level was subsequently determined to have minimal meaning
for most of these evaluations. Often times, the oxygen level was high when
the exhaust flow was low (e.g., idle and cut-throttle) and relatively low
when the exhaust flow was relatively high (e.g., highway speed). The inte-
gration of the oxygen in the undiluted exhaust does not compensate for these
changes in exhaust flow. It is possible to have a significant average oxygen
level and yet be deficient in oxygen over some portion of the driving cycle.
Therefore, the average oxygen level serves only as a general indicator of
the malfunction condition (e.g., average oxygen level decreases somewhat for
rich operation). Catalyst temperatures were effected by the placement of
the thermocouples and the cooling fans.
F. Emissions Test and Mileage Accumulation Procedures
One Federal Test Procedure, two driving schedules and one mileage accumu-
12
-------
lation procedure were utilized in this project. These are defined as
follows:
FTP - 1977 Federal Test Procedure^) (uses the Urban Dynamometer
Driving Schedule)
SET - Congested Freeway Driving Schedule^ '
HFET - Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule^ '
MODS - Modified Durability Driving Schedule for mileage accumulation
(with all WOT Accelerations changed to normal Accelerations).
This schedule is described in Appendix A-l.
Each of the three procedures and schedules, requiring emissions testing in
this project (FTP, SEP and HFET), utilized bagged samples for evaluation of
regulated emissions and fuel consumption.
The SET and the HFET are both hot-start, single-segment driving cycles.
The FTP, however, involves cold-start and hot-start, multi-cycle with multi-
segment operation. In addition, in this project a four-bag FTP was utilized
for most of the unregulated emissions; rather than the three-bag FTP speci-
fied in the Federal Test Procedure. Therefore, before proceeding, it is
important to clarify the meaning of FTP as used in this project:
FTP - The FTP uses the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) which
is 1372 seconds in duration. The UDDS, in turn, is divided into
two segments; the first having 505 seconds and the second having
867 seconds. The Federal Test Procedure consists of a cold-start
505 and a stabilized 867 followed by a hot-start 505. In this
project, the hot 505 was followed by another 867 segment. For
the remainder of this discussion, and throughout this report,
these cycles will be identified as follows:
Four Cycle FTP
Cold UDDS Hot UDDS
Cycle 12 34
Duration, seconds 505 867 505 867
Regulated Emissions, 3-Bag XX X
Regulated Emissions, 4-Bag XX XX
Unregulated Emissions:
Bag XX XX
Impinge r X X
Trap (Except DMNA) X X
Trap DMNA X
NOTE: X designates a sample taken
13
-------
A composite value in mass per distance for the three-cycle, three-sample
FTP regulated emissions is calculated using the following formula:
MASS _ 0.43 x (MASS 1 + MASS 2) + 0.57 x (MASS 3 + MASS 2)
DISTANCE ~ 0.43 x (DIST. 1 + DIST. 2) + 0.57 x (DIST. 3 + DIST. 2)
Assuming Distance 3 is equal to Distance 1, this equation can be reduced
to:
0.43 x (Ml + M2) + 0.57 x (M3 + M2)
3-FTP M/D =
Dl + D2
For the four-cycle FTP, two sample, composite values determined in this
project, the following formula was used:
MASS _ 0.43 x M(l + 2) + 0.57 x M(3 + 4)
DISTANCE 0.43X (Dl + D2) + 0.57 x (D3 + D4)
Assuming Distance 3 is equal to Distance 1 and Distance 4 is equal to
Distance 2, then this equation can be reduced to:
4-FTP M/D - 0-43 x M(l + 2) + 0.57 x M(3 + 4)
Dl + D2
Therefore, with the assumption that the changes in distance traveled
are negligible, the composite results with the four-cycle FTP relative
to results with the three-cycle FTP will differ only as the mass emis-
sions emitted during Cycle 4 differ from that emitted during Cycle 2.
An assumption made, that the overall effect of such differences were
relatively minor, was subsequently validated in the Task 1 evaluations.
The test sequence followed for each automobile is given in Table 3.
Sequences 1 through 7 were repeated for each of four malfunction conditions
on each automobile. The sequence followed in the laboratory for running one
set of emissions tests (FTP, SET and HFET) is given in Table 4.
The parameters of the three driving schedules used are summarized in
Table 5 and the schedules are illustrated in Figure 5. Other driving cycle
designations frequently used for the FTP are LA-4 and UDDS and for the SET
are CFDS and SET-7. In general, the FTP involves stop-and-go operation with
maximum speed generally below 65 km/hr (40 mph). The HFET generally involves
operation between 65 and 95 km/hr (60 mph). The SET appears to incorporate
characteristics of both the FTP and the HFET.
G. Test Numbering System
The numbering system, established for the various related unregulated
emissions projects being conducted at this laboratory, consists of six
digits. One of the digits was not required for this project so a dash (-)
was used in its place. The designations used for all vehicle testing, sub-
sequent to the malfunction screening evaluation, was PVM-ST. The meaning
of each letter or group of letters is described as follows:
14
-------
TABLE 3. TEST SEQUENCE FOR EACH MALFUNCTION
Sequence Operation Performed on Vehicle
upon receipt
1
Tune-up to manufacturer's specifications
Precondition for 1600 km (995 mi) using
the MDDS
Run FTP, SET, HFET - Sample and analyze ap-
plicable Task 2 compounds
Precondition for 200 km (125 mi) using
the MDDS
Modify to operate in a Task 1 malfunction
condition
Precondition for 100 km (62 mi) using
the MDDS
Run FTP, SET, HFET: FTP, SET, HFET - Sample
and analyze applicable Task 2 compounds
Return to unmodified condition, replace the
catalyst, and tune-up to manufacturer's
specifications.
FTP - Federal Test Procedure
SET - Congested Freeway Driving Schedule
HFET - Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule
MDDS - Modified Durability Driving Schedule
15
-------
TABLE 4. LABORATORY TEST SEQUENCE
1. Precondition, UDDS
2. Soak 12 to 20 hours
3. FTP - 4 bags for gaseous emissions
2 filter or impinger samples
4. Soak 20 minutes - Fan Off
5. Precondition first 505 seconds of UDDS
6. Idle 1 minute (+_ 15 seconds)
(a) auto trans - drive
(b) start additional cooling blowers
(c) place filter holder in tunnel
7. SET - 1 bag sample
1 filter or impinger sample
8. Engine Off - 10 minutes - Fan Off
9. HFET - 1 bag sample
1 filter or impinger sample
NOTE: 5000 cfm fan on during all car operation. Additional tire
and fuel tank cooling blowers on during all SET and HFET
operation
16
-------
TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF DRIVING SCHEDULE PARAMETERS
Duration, Distance, Average Speed
Seconds Kilometers km/hr mph
FTP:
505 505 5.8
866 866 6.2
UDDS 1371 12.0 31.4 19.5
SET 1398 21.7 56.0 34.8
HFET 765 16.5 77.6 48.2
17
-------
100
80
60
40
20
60
.TRANSIENT
PHASE
40
20
200
STABILIZED
PHASE
FTP
400
600 800
TIME, sec
1000
1200
1371
100,
HO
20
0
20
200
400
600 800
TIME, sec
1000
1200 1398
100
80
60
40
200 400
TIME, sec
600
765
Figure 5. Driving cycle speed vs time traces.
18
-------
Description
PV Vehicle Designation
P Project
V Vehicle
M- Condition Tested
M Malfunction
Space not used in this project
S Test Series (Unmodified or Malfunction)
T Individual Test (FTP, SET or HFET)
As used for
this project
1 through 5
1 through 5
1 through 3
1 through 3
The PV is used to identify the vehicle tested
In this project, the test condition is sufficiently identified by one
digit so the M, followed by a dash (-), is used to identify the specific
malfunction conditions
The S designated the test series (FTP, SET, HFET) where:
1 = Unmodified vehicle
2 & 3 = Initial and repeat test in a malfunction configuration
The T designates the individual test conducted where:
1 = FTP
2 = SET
3 = HFET
H. Computational Methods
The methods used for calculating the unregulated emissions results are
given in Appendix A-3. All regulated emissions were calculated using the
methods prescribed in the code of Federal Regulations for Light-Duty
Vehicles. ' On the computer printouts for the regulated emissions, in-
cluded in Appendixes B and E, all items of potential interest are identified
by descriptive headings. Items on the computer sheet identified only by
abbreviated headings are used in calculating the unregulated emissions.
19
-------
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
The analytical procedures used to measure the unregulated emissions are
summarized in this section. A detailed description of the procedures along
with a discussion of their development, validation, and qualification is
available in Interim Report II, "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing
Unregulated Pollutant Emissions From Motor Vehicles," developed in a related
EPA project. ^)
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures
The unregulated emissions evaluated in this project, along with the
methods for sampling and the procedures used in the analyses, are listed in
Table 6. Organic sulfides, organic amines, aldehydes and ketones, indivi-
dual hydrocarbons, and metals and other elements represent groups of com-
pounds. The respective procedures separate and identify a number of indi-
vidual compounds within each of these groups. The analytical procedures
involved in this project are briefly described as follows:
Organic Amines - The collection of organic amines (monomethylamine,
monoethylamine and dimethylandne, trimethylamine, diethylamine, and tri-
ethylamine) is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through glass
impingers containing dilute sulfuric acid. The amines are complexed by the
acid to form stable sulfate salts which remain in solution. A portion of
this solution is then injected into a gas chromatograph equipped with an
ascarite loaded pre-column and a nitrogen phosphorus detector (NPD). Ex-
ternal amine standards in dilute sulfuric acid are used to quantify the
results. Some analyses were also conducted using undiluted exhaust.
Ammonia - Ammonia in CVS diluted automotive exhaust is measured in the
protonated form, NH4+, after collection in dilute H2SO4. The acidification
is carried out in a glass impinger maintained at ice bath temperature. A
sample from the impinger is then analyzed for ammonia in an Ion Chromatograph
and the concentration in the exhaust is calculated by comparison to an ammo-
nium sulfate standard solution.
Aldehydes and Ketones - The collection of aldehydes (formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde and hexanaldehyde) and ketones (acetone and
methylethyIketone) is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through
glass impingers containing 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) in dilute hy-
drochloric acid. The aldehdyes and ketones (also known as carbonyl compounds)
react with the DNPH to form their respective phenylhydrazone derivatives.
These derivatives are insoluble or only slightly soluble in the DNPH/HCl
solution and are removed by filtration followed by pentane extractions. The
filtered precipitate and the pentane extracts are combined and then the pen-
20
-------
TABLE 6. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
Compound Sampling
Organic Amines Impinger
Ammonia (NH3) Impinger
Aldehydes and Ketones Impinger
Hydrogen Sulfide (H_S) Impinger
Total Cyanide [Hydrogen Impinger
Cyanide (HCN) and
Cyanogen (C2N2)]
Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) Trap
and Organic Sulfides
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Bag
Nickel Carbonyl Bag
(Ni(CO)4)
Individual Hydrocarbons Bag
Metals and Other Filter
Elements
Particulates Filter
Sulfate Filter
DMNA
Boiling Point
Distribution
Trap
Trap
Method of Analysis
Gas chromatograph with ascarite
pre-column and nitrogen-phosphorus
detector (GC-NPD).
Ion chromatograph.
Dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative.
Gas chromatograph with flame
ionization detector.
Methylene blue derivative.
Spectrophotometer.
Cyanogen chloride derivative. Gas
chromatograph with electron capture
detector (GC-ECD).
Gas chromatograph with flame
photometric detector (GC-FPD).
Gas chromatograph with electron
capture detector (GC-ECD).
Chemiluminescence (CL)
Gas chromatograph with flame
ionization detector.
Weighed using microbalance.
Spectral X-ray analysis at RTF.
Weighed using microbalance.
Barium chloranilate derivative
(BCA). Liquid chromatograph with
ultraviolet detector.
Gas chromatograph with mass
spectrometer at RTI (GC-MS).
Gas chromatograph with capillary
column and flame ionization detector.
21
-------
tane is evaporated in a vacuum oven. The remaining dried extract contains
the phenylhydrazone derivatives. The extract is dissolved in a quantitative
volume of toluene containing a known amount of anthracene as an internal
standard. A portion of this dissolved extract is injected into a gas chro-
matograph and analyzed using a flame ionization detector.
Hydrogen Sulfide - The collection of hydrogen sulfide is accomplished
by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through glass impingers containing a buffered
zinc acetate solution which traps the sulfide ion as zinc sulfide. The ab-
sorbing solution is then treated with N,N-dimethyl-para-phenylene diamine
sulfate and ferric ammonium sulfate. Cyclization occurs, forming the highly
colored heterocyclic compound methylene blue (3,9-bisdimethylaminophenazo-
thionium sulfate). The resulting solution is analyzed with a spectrophoto-
meter at 667 nm in a 1-cm or 4-cm pathlength cell depending upon the concen-
tration .
Total Cyanide (Hydrogen Cyanide plus Cyanogen) - The collection of total
cyanide is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through glass impin-
gers containing a 1.0 N potassium hydroxide absorbing solution. This solution
is maintained at ice bath temperature. An aliquot of the absorbing reagent
is then treated with Kl^PC^ and Chloramine-T. A portion of the resulting
cyanogen chloride is injected into a gas chromatograph equipped with an
electron capture detector (ECD). External CN~ standards are used to quantify
the results.
Carbonyl and Organic Sulfides - The collection of carbonyl sulfide (COS)
and the organic sulfides, methyl sulfide (dimethy1sulfide, (CH.J S), ethyl
sulfide (diethylsulfide (C2H5)2S) and methyl disulfide (dimethyldisulfide,
(CH3)2S2), is accomplished by passing CVS diluted exhaust through Tenax GC
traps at -76°C. At this temperature the traps remove the organic sulfides
from the dilute exhaust. The organic sulfides are thermally desorbed from
the traps into a gas chromatograph sampling system and injected into a gas
chromatograph equipped with a flame photometric detector for analysis.
External organic sulfide standards generated from permeation tubes are used
to quantify the results.
Nitrous Oxide - For measurement of nitrous oxide, a sample of the CVS
diluted exhaust is collected in a Tedlar bag. This bagged sample is then
analyzed for nitrous oxide using a gas chromatograph equipped with an
electron capture detector. Calibration blends are used to quantify the re-
sults. Gas chromatograph peak areas are obtained using a Hewlett-Packard
3354 computer system.
Nickel Carbonyl - Bagged samples of the CVS diluted exhaust are ana-
lyzed for nickel carbonyl (Ni(CO4) using a chemiluminescent NOX analyzer
modified with a No. 54 wratten filter. Bottled calibration blends are used
to quantify the results. The instruments has linear response between 0.1
ppb and 0.1 ppm.
Individual Hydrocarbons - For measurement of selected individual hydro-
carbons, methane (CH4) , ethane ^Hg) , ethylene (C2H4i acetylene (C2H2) ,
22
-------
propane (C,HQ), propylene (C3Hg), benzene (C H ), and toluene (CyHg), a
sample of CVS diluted exhaust is collected in a Tedlar bag. This bagged
sample is then analyzed for individual hydrocarbons using a gas chromato-
graphic system containing four separate columns and a flame ionization
detector. The peak areas are compared to an external calibration blend
and the individual hydrocarbon concentrations are obtained using a Hewlett-
Packard 3354 computer system.
Metals and Other Elements - The metals are collected as particulate on
a 47-mm Fluoropore filter, which is then sent to Research Triangle Park (RTF)
for analysis by X-ray spectroscopy. The diluted exhauat sample is taken
isokinetically from within the dilution tunnel. Weight gain on the filter
is determined by weighing the filter on a microbalance before and after
sampling.
Particulates - The "particulate" is collected isokinetically on a 47-mm
glass fiber filter. The amount of "particulate" collected in determined by
weighing the filter on a microbalance before and after sampling.
Sulfate - Automotive exhaust is vented into a dilution tunnel where it
is mixed with a flowing stream of filtered room air. In the tunnel, the
SO-j reacts rapidly with water in the exhaust to form sulfuric acid aerosols.
The aerosols grow to a filterable size range within the tunnel and are col-
lected isokinetically on a fluorocarbon membrane filter. Particulate sul-
fate salts are also collected on the filter.
Sulfuric acid collected on the filter is then converted to ammonium
sulfate by exposure to ammonia vapor. The soluble sulfates are leached from
the filter with a masured volume of an isopropyl alcohol - water solution
(60% IPA). A fixed volume of the sample extract is injected into a high
pressure liquid chromatograph (HPLC) and pumped through a column of strong
cation exchange resin in Ag+ form to .scrub out the halides (Cl~, Br~) and
then through a column of strong cation exchange resin in H+ form to scrub
out the cations and convert the sulfate to sulfuric acid. Passage through
a reactor column of barium chloranilate crystals precipitates out barium
sulfate and releases the highly UV absorbing chloranilate ions. The amount
of chloranilate ions released is equivalent to the sulfate in the sample and
is measured by a sensitive liquid chromatograph UV detector at 310-313 nano-
meters. All the reactions and measurement take place in a flowing stream of
60% IPA. The scrubber and reactor columns also function as efficient filter
media for any solid reaction products formed during passage of the sample
through the column system.
DMNA - The measurement of N-nitrosodimethylamine is accomplished by col-
lecting dilute exhaust (approximately 185:1 total dilution) in Tenax GC
sampling cartridges and shipping the cartridges to Research Triangle Insti-
tute (RTI) for analysis by capillary gas-liquid chromatography/mass spectro-
metry. The single ion monitoring (m/e 74) procedure used is not specific
to DMNA. Results using this procedure represent a total composite value for
all materials having background ions of m/e 74 and the same retention time
as DMNA. Since this procedure was not included in Interim Report Il'l), a
brief description of this procedure is included in Appendix A-2 of this report.
23
-------
Boiling Point Distribution - Samples for the boiling point distribution
are obtained by passing dilute exhaust through traps packed with Chromosorb
102. The traps are eluted with 2 mH of carbon disulfide and a portion of
the resulting extract is injected into a capillary-Gas Chromatograph system
for analysis. A Hewlett-Packard 3354 computer system is used to obtain peak
areas and a boiling point distribution. The system as used in this project
is qualitative only.
Other Compounds Considered - Initially phosphine and several halogen
compounds were to be evaluated in this project, and a literature search was
conducted to identify potential analytical methods. The halogen compounds
included phosgene, vinyl chloride, bromine, chlorine, hydrobromic acid and
hydrochloric acid. The requirement to measure these compounds was deleted
along with the deletion of leaded fuel as one of the malfunction conditions
to be evaluated in this project. Other compounds which were given some con-
sideration were phenols and BaP.
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical Procedures
The analytical procedures used in this project were subjected to a
series of validation and qualification experiments. Validation experiments
included checks for sample stability, sample collection efficiency, detector
linearity, interferences, and analysis repeatability. The qualification ex-
periments included the injection of the compound of interest into the tunnel
with and without the presence of exhaust and the subsequent recovery of that
compound at the procedure sampling point.
Sample stability checks were performed using repeated analysis of the
same sample at intervals over a specified period of time and comparing the
results to the initial analysis. Organic amines, aldehdyes and ketones,
ammonia, total cyanide, nitrous oxide and individual hydrocarbon samples
were found to be stable for several days. Carbonyl and organic sulfides
and the hydrogen sulfide samples were found to be stable for approximately
one day. Nickel carbonyl is stable for only a few hours.
Sample collection efficiency experiments were performed by passing a
known concentration of sample through a series of impingers or traps and
analyzing each impinger or trap individually for the compound of interest.
All procedures used in this project have a collection efficiency of 98% or
better. Detector linearity experiments were performed by preparing several
samples of various known concentrations and plotting the resulting peak area
versus the concentrations. All the procedures had linear response over the
range of interest in this project.
To determine the interferences for each procedure, known exhaust com-
ponents were introduced into the sample to determine their effect on the
resultant measurements. To determine analysis repeatability, several samples
of known concentrations were prepared and a number of complete analyses were
performed at each concentration. The results of these tests were then com-
pared to determine analyses repeatability.
24
-------
The qualification experiments were performed to determine if the com-
pounds of interest could travel the length of the dilution tunnel in the
presence of dilute exhaust without significant loss by reaction with exhaust
or the tunnel itself. The compounds were introduced at the same point at
which the exhaust enters the tunnel and were sampled at the normal sampling
point. Table 7 lists the procedures for which validation and qualification
experiments were performed.
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedure
A difficult, but very important, endeavor was the determination of pro-
cedural accuracy for each analytical method. The primary difficulty invol-
ved those procedures in which the exhaust compounds are trapped or absorbed,
an extraction or subsequent reaction is performed, and then a portion of the
extraction is analyzed. After much consideration, the decision was reached
to initially define the accuracy in terms of a "minimum detection value"
(MDV). The MDV, as used in this report, is defined as the value above which
it can be said that the compound has been detected in the exhaust (i.e., the
accuracy is equal to plus or minus the MDV at a measured value equal to the
MDV). Determination of accuracy over the entire range of each procedure was
beyond the scope of the project.
For compounds collected by bag samples, the MDV was determined from the
instrument detection limits only and is independent of the sampling rate and
duration. For compounds which are concentrated in impingers or traps, the
MDV is dependent on the instrument detection limit, chemical workup, sampling
rate and sampling duration. The MDV's listed in Table 8 were derived using
the listed sampling rates and a 23-minute sampling period.
25
-------
TABLE 7. PROCEDURAL VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION
Compound or Validation
Compound Group Conducted
Organic Amines Yes
Ammonia Yes
Aldehydes and Ketones Yes
Hydrogen Sulfide Yes
Total Cyanide Yes
Carbonyl Sulfide and Yes
Organic Sulfides
Nitrous Oxide Yes
Nickel Carbonyl Yes
Individual Hydrocarbons Yes
b
Metals and Other Elements No
Particulates No
Sulfate Nob
DMNA NoC
d , d
Boiling Point Distribution No No
Compound considered too dangerous to perform qualification experiments.
Established procedure.
Performed at RTP and RTI.
Procedure qualitative only.
Qualification
Conducted
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes
Noa
No
No
Nob
Nob
No°
26
-------
TABLE 8. EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
9/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons. , Jl/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC)
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Mol.
Wt.
32.00
44.01
96.01
Sample
Flow
Vmin
Bag
14.0
14.0
4.0
Bag
0.13
4.0
yg/m3
per
ppm ppm
Procedural
Minimum
Detection
Valuesa
4000 <0.01
yg/m
<50
6
MDV
for
FTP,
mg/kmb
11.88
28.01
46.01
Bag
Bag
Bag
575
1165
1915
1.0U
2.0C
0.5C
575
2330
958
10
40
16
0.1
=0.
-0.
-0.
5
5
05
1
17.03
26.02
74.08
34.08
107.75
44.02
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
Bag
Bag
710
1080
3080
1415
7100
1830
0.01
0.01
—
0.01
0.0001
0.01
7
11
—
14
0.7
18
0.1
0.2
—
0.2
0.01
0.3
Based on a 23-minute sampling period at the specified flow rate for all
impinger, filter and trap collected samples.
Based on Ug/m3 in the diluted exhaust and typical UDDS (FTP 505 & 866)
parameters (1371 seconds, 10 D.F., 206 m3 CVS flow, 12.0 km, 0.98 DSFC)
mg/km for FTP = yg/m3 x 206 T 12.0 x 0.98 x 0.001 - 0.0168 x yg/m3. For
SET: mg/km - 0.55 * mg/km for FTP. For HFET: mg/km - 0.74 x mg/km for FTP.
Based on the instrument ranges generally used in this project.
27
-------
TABLE 8 (CONT'D). EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone6
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Mol.
Wt.
30.03
44.05
58.08
72.12
70.09
100.16
106.13
16.04
28.05
30.07
26.04
44.11
42.08
78.12
92.15
CRCd
Synonym
—
—
2-Propanone
—
2-Butanone
2-Butenal
Hexanal
— —
—
Ethene
—
Ethyne
—
Propene
—
—
pg/m3
per
PPm
1250
1830
2415
3000
3000
2915
4165
4415
665
1165
1250
1085
1835
1750
3245
3830
Procedural
Minimum
Detection
Values3
ppm
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
--
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
ug/mj
15
20
25
30
30
—
40
—
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
MDV
for
FTP,
ing/km*3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
—
0.7
—
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1ami ne
Monoethylamine ^
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
60.08
62.13
90.19
94 . 20
—
Dimethyl
Dimethyl
Dimethyl
2500
2585
3750
3915
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
3
3
4
4
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.06
31.06 Amino-Methane
45.09 Amino-Ethane
59.11
73.14
101.19
1290 0.002 3 0.05
1875 0.002 4 0.05
2460 0.002 5 0.08
3040 0.002 6 0.10
4205 0.002 8 0.14
a & b
See initial page of this table.
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th Edition.
Includes Acrolein - 56.07 and Propionaldehyde - 58.08 (CRC - Propenal and
Propanal respectively).
Includes Dimethylamine - 45.09.
28
-------
IV. TASK 1 - MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS
Prior to starting the laboratory evaluations on the five cars acquired
for this project, a short series of tests were conducted using a rented car.
The purposes of these tests were to provide data toward selection of the four
malfunction conditions and to verify the applicability of the analytical
methods developed for the evaluation of the unregulated emissions. This
section discusses the initial selection of malfunction conditions along with
the results of the actual laboratory screening evaluations.
A. Selection of Malfunction Conditions
Following an extensive examination of available data on malfunction
conditions, by the EPA, seven malfunction conditions were selected as best
candidates for this project. The study, however, did not identify the ap-
propriate extent of malfunction. After due consideration, the criteria set
was that the extent of malfunction should be as severe as possible while
still retaining reasonable driveability and driver acceptability. The can-
didate malfunctions are discussed separately as follows:
Rich Operation at Idle - An effort was made toward defining a suitable
idle mixture setting for use in this project. This involved looking at idle
mixture settings experienced in several readily available report and papers
and at specified idle mixture settings for 1971 and earlier model vehicles.
Unfortunately, no idle related malfunction data on current model automo-
biles was available for this review.
In a study involving 1000 (1957-1971 model year) light-duty vehicles,
the overall average CO emissions rate at idle was 16.2 grams/min.(&) jn
a study of 368 (1966-1969) cars, the idle CO ranged from near 0 to 10 per-
cent. (7) About half of the cars had idle CO above 3 percent. Of the 368
cars, 37 had idle CO greater than 7.5 percent. In a study of 16 (non-
California) gasoline heavy-duty trucks ranging from the 1965-1975 model
year, the average exhaust CO emissions was 3.5 percent and the average emis-
sions rate was 30 grams/min.(8) The results with the 16 trucks, with idle
operation generally rated as satisfactory, are summarized as follows:
Exhaust Emission at Idle
Frequency
Raw CO, % of Occurrence
0-1 3
1-2 1
2-3 3
3-4 2
4-5 2
5-6 3
6-7 _2_
0-7 16
29
-------
If one assumes the same average CID and idle speed for the 100 light-duty
vehicles in Reference 6 as for the 16 heavy-duty vehicles in Reference 8,
the average percent CO for the 1000 vehicles comes out to be about 2 per-
cent (16.2 f 30 x 3.5) .
In summarizing from several repair and service manuals for older
vehicles, the following idle mixture settings appear to be applicable for
1966 through Early 197X Cars (Primary Source was the Chilton's Auto Repair
Manual, 1973).
• highest steady manifold vacuum
• highest steady idle speed
• lean best idle
• air/fuel ratios of 14.2, 14.0, 13.5 (1.5, 2.3 and 3.5 percent CO
based on SUN Combustion Efficiency Meter)
• 2.0 to 3.0 percent CO for 1969-1971 Opel (Motors Emission Control
Manual, copyright 1973)
For Pre-1971 Trucks the specified setting was "rich best idle" (Motor's
Truck and Diesel Repair Manual, 24th Edition, copyright 1971). Based on
these data, it appears that for pre-1970 light-duty vehicles, a specified
idle CO setting of around 2 to 3 percent was quite normal. Whereas, actual
idle CO values for vehicles in the field ranged from near 0 up to 10 percent
It was assumed that a maladjustment of idle mixture would tend toward
values normally obtained in pre-1970 model cars and trucks. With such an
assumption, pre-catalyst CO emissions associated with a maladjustment would
probably range between 3 and 8 percent. The extent of malfunction selected
for use in the project was "rich best idle" setting. Rich best idle, as used
here, is defined as the richest mixture setting at which the engine will idle
smoothly. Some newer cars have internal limits on the richest idle mixture
attainable. On those cars, an actual "rich best idle" setting could not be
attained.
Rich Operation Due to Improper Air Cleaner Maintenance - In another
project at this laboratory, some data had been generated on a 1976 Chevrolet
Vega with 14,320 km on the air cleaner. The air cleaner involved was flow-
checked on an existing SwRI facility and both the emissions and the flow
results are reported in this section. The 1975 Light-Duty Emissions Tests
results obtained with this car were as follows:
1975 Light-Duty
Emissions Tests Results
Air Cleaner 14,320 km New
HC, gAm 0.47 0.26
CO, gAm 10.53 4.48
C02r gAm 241.51 267.43
NOX, gAm 0.63 0.65
Fuel, V100 km 11.05 11.73
30
-------
14,320 km
0.22
0.32
0.57
0.87
1.19
1.54
Used?
0.22
0.32
0.57
0.87
1.22
1.62
New
0.15
0.20
0.32
0.50
0.70
0.97
New
0.14(0.6)
0.20(0.8)
0.32(1.3)
0.52(2.1)
0.72(2.9)
0.99(4.0)
As shown, the HC and CO emissions with the air cleaner which had been used
for 14,320 km (and visually appeared to be significantly restricted) were
about twice as high as were emissions obtained with a new filter. Fuel
consumption, however, was about 6 percent lower with the used filter than
with the new filter. There were no driver-detected differences between
operation with either the new or used filter.
Flow data for this used filter, another used filter with unknown usage
history, and two new filters are summaried as follows:
Flow, Filter Restriction, kPa ( H20)
Std. m3/sec(SCFM)
0.024( 50)
0.028( 60)
0.038( 80)
0.047(100)
0.057(120)
0.066(140)
As shown, the two used filters had approximately equivalent restriction and
the two new filters had approximately equivalent restriction. The average
ratio of the used to new filter restriction was about 1.65. Based on these
data, along with the minimal information that could be obtained from several
air filter manufacturers contacted, the decision was reached to essentially
double the pressure drop of a new air filter for the car to be tested.
Leaded Fuel Operation - Use of leaded fuel was initially selected as a
candidate malfunction. Its use was subsequently deleted by the EPA Project
Officer due to lack of emission measurement methods for halogen compounds
at the time malfunction conditions were being selected.
Engine Misfire - An Electronic Ignition Misfire unit was assembled in
accordance with schematics obtained from the EPA Project Officer. The
system was designed and used by Exxon Research and Engineering Company in
a previous EPA contract. With only a few difficulties, the initial unit
assembled by SwRI functioned well; reflecting good circuit design by Exxon.
Using a standard oscilloscope and the scope on a Sun 1120 Electronic
Ignition Tester, it was determined that this unit functions as follows:
Misfire Setting,
percent Misfire Unit Operation
00.00 to 10.00 Misfires the tenth ignition signals to the extent
necessary
10.00 Misfires every tenth ignition signal
10.01 to 19.99 Misfires every tenth ignition signal plus fifth
ignition signals to the extent necessary
19.99 Misfires every tenth and essentially every fifth
ignition signals (19.99 is the maximum setting)
31
-------
Accuracy of this unit was determined by actual counts in slow speed operation
on a bench set-up and in higher speed operation on a vehicle using sequence
comparison.
The accuracy of this system, as determined using the scope of the Sun
1120 tester, is illustrated as follows. On an eight cylinder engine with a
misfire setting of 10.00 percent, the misfire sequence was either cylinders
2, 4, 6, 8, 2 or 1, 3, 5, 7, 1. With a misfire setting of 10.10 percent at
1000 rpm with a 2, 4, 6, 8, 2 misfire sequence, number 1, 3,5 and 7 cylinders
each misfired once per minute. The actual percent of misfire for the 10.10
percent setting can be determined as follows:
1x4
Actual Misfires = 10.00% + 4 x 100% = 10.10%
Within the 0 to 19.99 percent misfire setting capability of this unit,
it appears that the worst case situation for any one engine cylinder is one
misfire for every five ignition signals. Over any long term vehicle operation,
with engine starts and stops, each cylinder should experience about the same
number of total misfires.
The Electronic Ignition Misfire units was installed on the department
owned automobile and driven by a number of individuals in an effort to
determine a reasonable misfire malfunction level. The department automobile
is a 1972 Plymouth with a 360 CID V-8 engine. Out of seven individuals,
three consistently detected levels of 2 to 3 percent misfire as a condition
which caused them some concern. (All of these three are good mechanics,
drive V-8 powered automobiles, and do their own mechanic work.) One indi-
vidual consistently detected levels of about 5 percent. With the remaining
three, misfire levels up to 7 percent were required before they became
concerned. (Two of these three drive very high mileage, 6-cylinder auto-
mobiles.) At 10 and 12 percent misfire, although it was readily detectable,
driveability remained reasonably acceptable. At much about 12 percent,
driveability became unacceptable. A decision was reached to use misfire
settings of 7 and 12 percent in the malfunction screening evaluations.
EGR Failure - The failure mode selected was to make the EGR valve in-
operable in a closed position. This represents an extreme malfunction con-
dition which would not be readily detectable in many, but not all, makes of
cars. Other extreme EGR malfunction conditions, such as the valve stuck
open, generally produce severe effects on idle operation and/or driveability.
The EGR failure mode was achieved by disconnecting and plugging the vacuum
tubing to the EGR.
Air Pump Failure - Several potential air pump failures include: a
disconnected air line, air dump valve stuck in the dump position and a
broken or disconnected air pump drive belt. In each case essentially no
air is pumped into the exhaust system and the failure would not be readily
detectable, or of direct concern, to the driver. For this project, the
air pump failure mode was achieved by disconnecting the air hose at the
check valve and capping the check valve inlet.
32
-------
Excessive Lubricant Consumption - In several automobile owner's and
maintenance manuals, it was stated or indicated that oil consumption of one
quart per 1000 miles is to be considered not-excessive. On the other hand,
it seems reasonable to assume that essentially all drives would consider
adding a quart of engine lubricant at each gasoline fill-up as being ex-
cessive, or at least at the very limit of toleration. Therefore, an oil
consumption rate of one quart per every 500 kilometers (300 miles) was
selected for use in this project.
Several methods were considered for achieving the desired rate of oil
consumption. Mixing the lubricant into the gasoline would have been the
simplest method. Such mixing, however, would not be representative of the
actual process in which high oil consumption normally occurs in an engine.
Removing the intake valve guide seals, reaming out the valve guides, in-
stalling the oil rings incorrectly, etc. provide more natural methods for
achieving high oil consumption. With these methods, however, extensive
trial and error would be required to achieve the desired rate of oil con-
sumption.
An oil consumption system was developed to achieve the simulation of
oil consumption through the intake valve guides. This system consisted of
multi-channel, low flow-rate peristaltic pumps with separate lines to each
engine cylinder utilized. The lubricating oil exists onto the intake valve
stem at a constant flow rate (except for minor short-term flow changes that
occur following a rapid change in engine manifold pressure). The flow rate
was individually set for each test cycle to obtain an average oil consumption
rate of 2.0 ± 0.2 millilitres per kilometer (300 ± 30 miles per quart).
System installation required a 1/2-NPT (13 mm threaded) port into the
intake manifold for each engine cylinder to be utilized. This generally
required removing the intake manifold from the engine. With the intake
manifold replaced on the engine, 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) outside diameter stainless
steel tubing assemblies with compression fittings, were fitted and installed
into each threaded port. A U-shaped guide welded onto the end of each tube
assured proper horizontal alignment with the intake valve stems. After
assuring proper location and contact between the ends of the tubes and the
intake valve stems, the tubes were locked into position by tightening the
compression fittings.
Once installed, the system could provide a wide range of oil consumption
flow rates to the engine. Other than the fact that the installation of this
system was rather tedious, no significant difficulties were experienced with
the three cars tested using this system. Due to the use of a rented car and
scheduling requirements, high oil consumption was not included in the initial
malfunction screening evaluations.
Other Malfunction Conditions - Among the conditions initially considered,
which were not included as one of the seven candidate malfunctions, were such
conditions as a stuck PCV valve, the choke stuck partially closed, and lean
operation of the carburetor. Lean operation appears to be a rather limited
malfunction condition and, in any severe case, would generally have a signi-
ficant detrimental effect on driveability. A PVC valve stuck open would have
33
-------
a significant effect at idle and would probably be readily noticeable and of
concern to the driver. A partially closed choke or a PVC valve stuck in the
minimum flow position or partially plugged would enrich the intake fuel-air
mixture. Rich operation was already being evaluated by other methods.
B. Test Plan, Car and Parameters for Task 1 Evaluations
The test plan for the malfunction screening evaluations is given in
Table 9. A cold start four-bag FTP was run at each engine configuration.
When the change in configuration was minor, one time through the UDDS was
used to prepare the car for the test on the following day. Between major
changes in configuration, the car was run for several miles over the road
before running the preparatory UDDS.
The car used for these screening evaluations was a 1978 Oldsmobile
Cutlass with a 305-V8 engine. This car is described as follows:
Source: Budget Rent-a-Car No. 48013
Make & Model: 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Coupe
Engine: 305-V8 w/4-barrel carburetor
Transmission: Automatic 3-speed
Tires: Goodyear Polysteel Radial P195/75R14
Accessories: Power Steering, Power Brakes & Air Conditioning
Serial No.: 3R47H8R405301
Engine No.: DS305CUIN 810LA 8BFV
Engine Serial: T0916DAC
Dynamometer power and inertia settings utilized were 8.0 kW (10.7 hp)
and 1590 kg (3500 pounds) respectively. An available commercial unleaded
gasoline, that does not contain manganese, was used in these screening
evaluations. This gasoline, identified as EM-268, has a research octane
number of 91.3, a motor octane number of 85.3 and a sulfur level of 0.03
weight percent.
C. Task 1 Results
Initially two baseline runs, involving regulated emissions only, were
made. During these evaluations, the unregulated exhaust constituents were
also sampled to determine and rectify any difficulties in the sampling
system and methods. The computer printouts for these and all malfunction
screening evaluations are included in Appendix B. The results of the two
baseline runs are summarized as follows:
Test 10AO
Run I Run 2
3-Bag (4-Bag) 3-Bag (4-Bag)
Carbon Dioxide, g/km 345.4 (340.6 ) 355.2 (350.2 )
Fuel Cons., £/100km 15.04 ( 14.81) 15.50 ( 15.27)
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.31 ( 0.29) 0.40 ( 0.40)
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 3.78 (3.57) 4.27 ( 4.06)
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 0.83 ( 0.84) 0.80 ( 0.81)
34
-------
TABLE 9. TASK PLAN FOR MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS
A. Use mid-size GM vehicle with 305-V8 engine.
B. Tune-up to manufacturer's specification.
C. Run 4-bag FTP and sample regulated and unregulated emissions for the
following configurations.
Test
No.
10AO
10A1
10B1
10AO
10C1
10D1
10D2
10E1
10F1
10F2
10AO
Run No.
1 & 2
1, 2 & 3
1
' 3
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
Engine Configuration
Baseline Engine (Regulated Emissions Only)
Baseline Engine
Rich Best Idle
Baseline Engine (Regulated Emissions Only)
Plugged EGR Vacuum Line
5 Degree Timing Retard (i.e., 1° ATDC)
8 Degree Timing Advance3 (i.e., 12" BTDC)
Air Flow Restriction (250 mm restriction at 200 cfm)
7 Pet. Ignition Misfire
12 Pet. Ignition Misfire
Baseline Engine (Regulated Emissions Only)
Point at which pre-ignition just became apparent under rapid acceleration.
35
-------
The primary purposes of these initial evaluations were to assure that
this car produced realistic emission levels and to check out the unregulated
emissions sampling systems and methods. These regulated emissions values
were below the 1978 limits and appeared to be realistic. The fuel consump-
tion (15.27 £/100 km) was about 17 percent greater than the City value (13.07
£/100 km) given in the 1978 Gas Mileage Guide. Based on the information in
the published literature and on the fuel consumption obtained using an equi-
valent automobile in a recent proprietary project, this rate of fuel consump-
tion appeared to be somewhat on the high side; but did not appear to be un-
realistic. Therefore, this automobile was considered to be acceptable for
use in these Task 1 malfunction screening evaluations.
These initial baseline evaluations were followed by the series of
evaluations involving analyses of unregulated emissions. The results for
these evaluations are summarized in Table 10. A repeat of this summary,
the computer printouts for regulated emissions and the individual sample FTP
results are given in Appendix B. The individual 4-bag results, given in ppm
in Appenidx B, are an approximation of the net emissions (exhaust minus
background.
The definition for the engine configuration as used in Task 1 are as
follows:
Baseline - Car as received with the engine tuned-up to manufacturer's
specifications.
Rich Best Idle - Richest mixture attainable due to an internal limit
within the carburetor.
No EGR - Vacuum line to EGR was disconnected and plugged.
Ignition Timing - One degree ATDC for 5° Ret and 12 degrees BTDC for
8° Adv.
Dirty Air Filter - Restricted to 2.7 kPa (10.7" of water) at 0.094
standard mVsec (200 scfm) . Pressure drop for a
new filter was 1.5 kPa (5.6" of water).
Misfire - Ignition misfiring at seven percent and at 12 percent.
Referring to the data in Table 10, rich best idle produced the highest
emissions values for:
• Hydrocarbons and Carbon Monoxide
• Total Particulates
• Total Individual Hydrocarbons
• Ammonia
• Cyanide and Cyanogen
• Hydrogen Sulfide
• Acetaldehyde
36
-------
TABLE 10. SUMMARY OF THE TASK 1 COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
In rag/km, Except as Noted
Test Number,
PVMT-R
Barometer, mm, Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons g/km
Carbon Monoxide g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, <
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes and Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide and Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
10A1-1
741.7
10.4
25.6
33.81
352.2
15.35
0.33
4.12
0.82
15.89
0.21
0.61
13.8
124.3
0. 14
0-00
2.10
0.24
0.00
Baseline
10A1-2
735.1
12.2
23.3
33.47
347.8
15.20
0.31
4.72
0.80
15.83
0.17
0.51
1.7
148.6
0. 07
0.00
1.32
0.58
0.00
0.00
12.81
10A1-3
742.4
8.8
24.4
33.14
6.55
423
346.1
15.05
0.29
3.56
0.75
7.14
0.11
0.32
138.5
0-00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
9.67
Rich
Best
Idle
10B1
735.6
11.2
23.9
34.39
3.60
418
304.4
15.62
2.09
34.95
0.59
22.55
0.25
0.72
10.9
1141.9
0.00
9.25
2.27
0.38
0.00
24.66
No EGR
10C1
740.9
8.0
23.3
29.55
5.15
423
308.0
13.42
0.32
3.41
2.20
9.96
0.10
0.34
6.5
144.0
0.00
0.62
0.98
0.00
0-00
29.35
Ignition Timing
5° Ret 8° Adv
10D1
743.5
9.7
23.9
34.24
4.20
401
474
355.5
15.55
0.29
5.02
0.62
7.15
0.19
0.55
4.9
150.2
0.00
0.74
0.43
0.00
o.oo
8.29
10D2
739.1
11.6
22.8
30.91
4.25
374
448
322.4
14.04
0.32
3.52
1.08
7.35
0.16
0.52
2.2
139.3
0.25
0.00
0.72
0.65
0.00
0.00
12.39
Dirty
Air
Filter
10E1
731.8
12.0
23.9
31.79
4.05
390
466
330.1
14.43
0.35
4.42
0.68
5.04
0.10
0.30
155.1
0.46
0.00
2.97
0.80
0.00
0.00
9.40
Misfire
7%
10F1
734.1
7.5
21.7
32.85
3.75
433
524
337.4
14.92
1.31
5.04
0.79
6.76
0.18
0.55
9.9
240.0
0.25
0.00
1.32
0.31
0.00
0.00
10.58
12%
10F2
735.6
9.4
23.3
34.02
3.80
469
572
345.6
15.45
2.01
6.38
0.92
7.26
0.33
0.97
18.4
228.8
0 11
0.03
5.05
0.34
0.00
o.oo
11.57
-------
TABLE 10 (CONT'D) . SUMMARY OF THE TASK 1 COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
In mg/km. Except as Noted
U)
03
Test Number,
PVMT-R
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
IsobutyraIdehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
He xana1dehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC,
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC,
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Bisulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
10A1-1
3.26
1.65
6.00
1.88
0.71
0.28
13.8
4.2
39.88
25.46
11.88
5.01
1.45
11.88
8.96
19.77
124.3
37.6
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Baseline
10A1-2
1.41
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.19
1.7
0.5
54.02
29.71
16.67
5.98
1.99
13.96
12.10
14.13
148.6
47.9
0.07
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10A1-3
—
—
—
—
—
—
50.08
25.66
16.49
5.50
1.56
12.56
9.41
17.24
138.5
47.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Rich
Best
Idle
10B1
4.62
5.43
0 .00
0.78
0.05
0.06
10.9
0.5
326.2
388.5
43.73
8.41
2.97
104.32
102.61
165.13
1141.9
54.6
__
—
—
—
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
o.oo
Ignition Timing
No EGR
10C1
6.01
0.00
0 .00
0-00
0 .00
0.46
6.5
2.0
46.29
21.90
11.29
6.40
0.36
11.04
13.23
33.47
144.0
45.0
__
—
—
—
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
o.oo
5° Ret
10D1
1.76
0.00
0-00
2.99
0.09
0.09
4.9
1.7
61.24
27.25
12.02
6.27
1.40
11.85
12.05
18.10
150.2
51.8
__
—
—
—
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
8° Adv
10D2
1.20
0.64
0 -00
0.10
0.12
0.15
2.2
0.7
55.99
24.41
14.70
5.98
0.46
11.28
10.43
16.00
139.3
43.5
o.oo
0.00
0.14
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
Dirty
Air
Filter
10E1
—
—
—
—
—
—
59.64
28.35
13.67
5.13
1.12
14.26
12.27
20.61
155.1
44.3
0.46
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0 .00
o.oo
Misfire
7%
10F1
3.11
3.16
2.69
0.21
0.54
0.14
9.9
0.8
58.24
29.93
12.53
8.72
0.76
17.72
26.71
85.37
240.0
18.3
0.11
0.00
0. 14
o.oo
0.00
0 -00
0 .00
o.oo
o.oo
12%
10F2
3.52
3.40
4.40
0 .00
7.02
O.Ob
18.4
0.9
41.70
33.81
11.40
2.73
1.29
22.00
33.08
82.77
228.8
11.4
O.OT
0.00
0. 04
o.oo
0.00
Trace
0.00
0.00
o.oo
-------
TABLE 10 (CONT'D). SUMMARY OF THE TASK 1 COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
In mg/km, Except as Noted
Test Number, PVMT-R
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
Baseline
Rich
Best Ignition Timing Air
Idle No EGR 5° Ret 8° Adv Filter
Misfire
7%
10A1-1 10A1-2 10A1-3
0.05 0.05 0.05
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.05 0.04 0.04
0.01
0.20
10B1
10C1
No
Data
for
this
test
10D1
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.14
10D2
0.09
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.20
10E1
10F1
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.29
12%
10F2
0.03
0.02 0.04
0.04 0.06
0.02
0.37
-------
In addition, rich best idle produced among the highest values of formaldehyde,
nitrous oxide and sulfate. No nickel carbonyl was detected under any of the
conditions tested. The levels of organic sulfides detected were relatively
small, but were above the minimum detection limits of the procedure. Due to
procedural difficulties, the organic sulfides during rich best idle were not
determined.
In these evaluations, rich best idle generally produced the highest
levels for most of the unregulated emissions. It does not appear appropriate
to attempt general ranking of the remaining malfunctions without having
weighting factors to equalize all emissions to an equivalent level of impor-
tance ,
D. Analyses of the Task 1 Data
Several analyses of the Task 1 data are discussed in this section.
Relationship of Four-Cycle to Three-Cycle FTP - In the Task 1 results for
some regulated emissions and some bagged unregulated emissions, there were
differences between the emission rates during Cycles 2 and 4. The effect of
these differences, however, on the composite results were generally not very
significant. The composite three-bag and four-bag results for the baseline
evaluations are summarized as follows:
Seven Baseline Runs
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
The overall average and maximum change in the HC, CO, NOX and C02 four-bag
results, relative to three-bag results were as follows:
As Percent of 3-Bag Results
3-Bag
346.8
0.33
4.31
0.78
Ave rage
4-Bag
341.1
0.32
4.11
0.79
Std. Deviation
4v3, %
98
97
95
101
3-Bag
5.7
0.04
0.59
0.06
4-Bag
7.5
0.04
0.57
0.07
co2
HC
CO
NOX
Averagea
98
98
96
101
Largest Difference
97
91b
92b
103C
a
, Average of 14 data points
Occurred during rich best idle malfunction condition
Excluding one value of 106 which was not consistent with
other values
40
-------
Referring to these data, it appears that four-bag results produced somewhat
lower CO-, HC and CO and slightly higher NOX- These differences, however,
are judged as being small enough to be considered as negligible for purposes
of this project. Therefore, assuming this relationship also applies to all
the unregulated emissions, the four-cycle results obtained should be repre-
sentative of three-cycle results.
Significant Emissions Values - The number of decimal places in the reporting
format for unregulated emissions was set at two decimal places after deter-
mination of a few procedural "minimum" detection values. In reviewing the
Task 1 results, several other areas were also investigated in an attempt
toward establishing the appropriate number of significant digits for reporting
these data. Two of the other areas were: comparison of the emissions levels
to the background levels and relative comparison to the OSHA threshold limit
values.
The miminim, maximum and average background levels for several of the
unregulated emissions were as follows for the Task 1 evaluations:
Background Level
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Ammonia
Cyanide and Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Formaldehyde 9 48 22 0.018 0.04
Benzene 16 200 71 0.022 0.11
yg/m3
Min. Max. yg/m3
0
0
14
4
0
0
604
0
0
89
10
<1
0
714
0
0
44
6
0
0
655
Average
ppm
0
0
0.062
0.005
0
0
0.358
mg/kma
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.01
0
0
1.1
Equivalent values assuming the measured emission levels in the undiluted
exhaust were two times the background emission levels. (e.g., nitrous
oxide in the undiluted exhaust equal to 0.716 ppm)
To enable determination of an increase in undiluted exhaust level equal to
the background level, reporting to two decimal places would be required for
several of the compounds shown in the illustration.
Another cursory evaluation involved threshold limit values as recom-
memded by the 1968 American Conference of Government Hygenists^9) and as re-
ported in the 1976 edition of the "Registry of Toxic Effect of Chemical Sub-
stances. "(10) These values are defined as the "Concentration in air to which
nearly all workers may be continuously exposed without adverse effects."
The values for several of the compounds were as follows:
41
-------
Threshold Limit Values ppm
Compound AC-GH RTECS(
Ammonia 50 50
Carbon Monoxide 50 50
Benzene — 10
Cyanide and Cyanogen 10 CN-Skin 5
Hydrogen Sulfide 10 20 ceiling
Amines — 10a
Carbonyl Sulfide 10
Nitrogen Dioxide 5 5
Formaldehyde — 3
Nickel Carbonyl 0.001 0.001
a
Lowest value for any of the amines listed
Therefore, on the basis of toxicity many of the compounds appear to range
between nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide. Oxides of nitrogen and carbon
monoxide are normally reported to the nearest one hundredth of a gram per
kilometer (i.e., ten milligrams). On this basis, it appears that for some
of the unregulated emissions, measuring and reporting to the nearest one
hundredth of a milligram may be more accurate than necessary.
Additional procedural "minimum detection values" were determined and
from these it appeared that the values ranged from a low of 0.01 for nickel
carbonyl up to about 0.5 for aldehydes and individual hydrocarbons. These
"minimum detection values", however, were preliminary for several of the
substances and subject to change as additional data were developed.
Taking the foregoing factors into account, it was decided best to
report the data to a number of decimal places equal to or, in a couple of
instances, up to one decimal place more than in the respective "minimum
detection values". This method retains the data and eliminates the need for
repeated use of terms such as "below preliminary MDV" or "trace" in the
tables. It was felt to be important to retain the data until such time that
procedural repeatability and reproducibility have been definitely established.
Therefore, all data values which are nearly equal to the minimum detection
value, whether somewhat above or below, should be used with caution.
42
-------
V. VEHICLE TESTING
Regulated and unregulated emissions from five late model cars were
measured while operating under malfunction conditions. This section presents
the results of those evaluations.
A. Test Matrix
The cars, malfunction conditions and procedures are described in pre-
vious Sections II through IV. The test matrix for the cars and malfunctions
is given in Table 11. Each of the five cars was tested in the rich best idle,
12 percent ignition misfire and disabled EGR malfunction configurations.
Three were tested under conditions of excessive oil consumption and two at
rich best idle with the air pump disabled.
Due to under-hood component interferences, additional oil could only be
supplied to six intake valve stems on Car Test 124, the 1978 Malibu, and to
four on Car Test 154, the 1978 Mustang II. On each of the three cars tested,
however, the oil consumption rate was maintained at a relatively constant
total flow rate of 2.0 ± 0.2 millilitres per kilometer.
B. Test Results
Summaries of the test results are included in Appendix C. Individual
sample data for the FTP evaluations are included in Appendix D and the com-
puter printouts for the regulated emissions are included in Appendix E.
In the data tables, a double dash (—) has been used when no test data
were available. This occurs for those unregulated emissions which were only
tested on a spot-check basis and when valid test data could not be obtained
due to instrument malfunction or loss of the sample.
In a number of cases the difficulty encountered with an unregulated
emission data point could be satisfactorily corrected. Such corrected data
are reported to the nearest whole number. This situation was most prevalent
with the individual hydrocarbon and nitrous oxide data due to a sampling
system malfunction that remained undetected for some period of time.
All FTP unregulated emissions data, with the exception of DMNAa, are
based on appropriately weighted four-cycle FTP results. The DMNA evaluations
consisted of a single trap taken continuously over the first three cycles of
In this report, the term DMNA represents the total concentration of all
materials measured from a mass spectrometric signal at m/e 74.
43
-------
TABLE 11. SUMMARY OF MALFUNCTION CONDITIONS TESTED
Car Test Number
Rich 12% Excess R.B.I. &
Best Ignition Disabled Oil Disabled
Car Description Idle Misfire EGR Cons. Air Pumpd
11 AMC Pacer 111 112 113 114
12 Malibu 49S 121a 122 123 124
13 Malibu Calif. 131a 132 133 — 135
14 Granada 141 142 143b — 145
15 Mustang II 151 152 153 154
Cars 12 and 13 were set at the maximum rich setting attainable due to
an internal limit on the richest mixture attainable. This limit was
on the lean side of "rich best idle".
Vacuum hose to the air pump was also disconnected in addition to the
vacuum hose to the EGR.
£j
d Rate set at 2 ml/km (300 miles per quart).
Rich best idle plus complete disabling of the air pump.
44
-------
the four-cycle FTP. If most of the DMNA were formed during the cold-start
505, then the reported DMNA data would be on the high side (up to a maximum
of about 1.5 times the value that would be obtained in a standard weighted
three-sample FTP). If the DMNA were produced at a constant rate in all
three cycles, then such weighted composite results would be essentially
identical to these continuous sample three-cycle results.
C. Other Test Analyses and Evaluations
Additional analyses were conducted at the 12 percent misfire condition
and to determine the regulated emissions during operation at idle. Additional
evaluations involved sample collection on Teflon-coated glass fiber filters.
Ignition_Misfire - A check of the misfire generator was conducted using
the data obtained with Car Test 112. Car 11, the AMC Pacer, did not have a
catalyst. The results of these evaluations were as follows:
Fuel
Consumption (FC) Emissions Increase(El) , g/km
at 12% Misfire 12% Misfire Minus Unmodified EI/FC,C
Cycle VIOO km gAma HC CO HC + 0.5 x CO13 Percent
FTP 15.6 115 10.06 2.87 11.5 10.0
SET 13.1 97 7.74 4.59 10.0 10.3
HFET 12.1 89 7.22 5.37 9.9 11.1
density = 0.739 g/m£
CO as fuel = (12/28) x (13.89/12) x CO = 0.5 x CO
C
EI/FC = total equivalent unburned fuel increase in the exhaust divided by
the total fuel consumption on a weight basis.
The preceding illustration does not take into account any of the fuel from
misfire which could have oxidized to CO2. The resultant ratios, of increase
in equivalent unburned fuel in the exhaust to total fuel used, agree well
enough to assume the car was misfiring at or near the 12 percent misfire
setting.
It was noted that the increases in fuel consumption with Cars 122 and
152 were not as great for the SET and HFET as had been experienced for Car
112. For these cars with a catalyst, an analyses of misfire cannot be based
on the after-catalyst emission rates. The after-catalyst temperature was
increased by the operation under misfire, but there was no method available
to calculate an accurate theoretical percent misfire from the increase in
catalyst temperature. Therefore, several evaluations were subsequently con-
ducted in conjuntion with Car Test 132.
The initial evaluation with Car 132 was determination of the effect of
misfire on steady-state operation. The results were as follows with the
throttle held steady at two different initial vehicle speeds.
45
-------
Speed, Percent Dynamometer
km/h (mph) Misfire kW (hp)
35 (22) 0 1.1 (1.5)
37 (23) 12 1.2 (1.6)
35 (22) 0 1.1 (1.5)
37 (23) 12 1.2 (1.6)
61 (38) 0 3.0 (4.0)
63 (39) 12 3.1 (4.2)
61 (38) 0 3.0 (4.0)
At these conditions investigated, the speed of the vehicle increased when the
engine was misfired at the 12 percent rate.
The next evaluation involved a check of the ignition misfire unit at a
vehicle speed of approximately 64 kilometers per hour. Using the Sun 1120
Analyzer, and the procedure utilized in initially calibrating the misfire
unit, a setting of ten percent produced a ten percent misfire rate. A setting
of twelve percent produced 20 percent more misfires than a ten percent setting.
The final evaluation involved an analysis of the exhaust emission rates
before the catalyst. A probe was installed into the exhaust crossover pipe.
Results of these evaluations were as follows:
Emission Rate at Misfire Percent
Operating
Conditions
Idle
20 mph
40 mph
Based on the large increase in HC and the 9 to 12 percent decrease in CC>2, it
can be concluded that misfire on the order of the 12 percent setting was
actually occurring.
Therefore, it was concluded that the ignition misfire unit was misfiring
the engine at the rate set into the unit. Under some operating conditions,
the power output of some of the engines apparently increased as the engine
was made to misfire. Fuel consumption over a cycle does not necessarily
increase in proportion to the percent of misfire (in some cases it did not
increase at all). The catalyst oxidizes most of the raw fuel introduced into
the exhaust during operation with ignition misfire.
Disabled EGR - With the AMC Pacer and the two Chevrolet Malibus, dis-
abling the EGR valve had no readily noticeable effect on driveability and per-
formance. With the Ford Granada and Mustang II, however, disabling the EGR
valve resulted in signigicant "engine detonation" during part-throttle
acceleration. It was sufficiently severe to be of concern to many or most
drivers.
46
HC,
0%
3500
600
900
ppm
12%
10500
9600
10900
C02,
0%
9.2
10.9
11.4
%
12%
8.3
9.9
10.0
% Decrease
in CC>2
9.7
9.2
12.3
-------
Idle Emission Values - Idle emissions values were determined from the
dilute emissions values recorded continuously during the evaluations. It
should be emphasized, however, that the emissions values during the various
idles in a test were found to vary significantly. Therefore, the idle
emissions values given in Table 12 represent relative, rather than absolute,
values. The dilute values given in the table are the emissions as-read
during seconds 153 and 163 in the hot-start UDDS of the FTP. These values
were then processed through the computer to determine the dilution ratio.
This dilution ratio was then utilized in calculating the approximate raw
emission values. Oxides of nitrogen emissions were not included since the
low values obtained during idle cannot be accurately determined from the
continuous charts.
Pallflex Filter Samples - Upon completion of the testing, a total of
five 20-cm by 25-cm (8" x 10") Type T60A20 Pallflex filter samples of the
diluted exhaust were taken for possible bioassay analyses at the EPA. The
Pallflex filter samples were taken using a high-volume sampling system with
a nominal sample flow rate of 0.85 standard m3/min (30 scfm). The 8.9-cm
(3.5 inch) inside diameter sampling probe required the use of an 18-inch
diameter dilution tunnel. Available CVS flow rates for use in these evalua-
tions were 9 and 14 standard m3/min (300 and 500 scfm). In order to keep
the sample temperature at the Pallflex filter below 43°C (100°F), use of
the 14-n\3/min CVS was required with Car Tests 113 and 142.
The same filter was used throughout a four-bag FTP. After weighing
each filter, following sampling, the filters were sealed in a bag and stored
in a freezer at minus 18 degrees centrigrade (0°F).
The results were as follows for the four-bag FTP evaluations sampled:
Car Pallflex Filter Total mg
No. Description Malfunction PL No. mg on filter in Exhaust
113 Pacer Disabled EGR 11008 10.61 193
121 Malibu Rich Best Idle 11005 3.66 44
135 Malibu Cal. Dis. Air Pump & R.B.I. 11003 4.88 59
142 Granada 12% Misfire 11007 5.89 107
154 Mustang II High Oil Consumption 11004 17.54 211
Regulated emissions results were taken for the cars operated on the 9-m-Vmin
CVS (Cars 121, 135, and 154). These results, along with previously obtained
results, were as follows:
Emissions, g/km (Fuel in 1/100 km)
During PF Tests Previously Determined
Car HC CO NOX Fuel HC CO NOX Fuel
113
121 1.2 36 0.6 15.2 1.1 26 0.6 14.7
135 1.4 60 0.3 18.9 1.2 53 0.3 17.9
142
154 0.6 6 0.8 15.1 0.5 6 0.9 15.4
47
-------
TABLE 12. IDLE EMISSIONS DURING FTP CYCLE
Hydrocarbons as C
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
*>
00
Dilute
ppm
10
64
434
43
66
36
110
10
1
2
12
46
14
6
120
8
79
62
28
201
7
25
35
8
25
Approx . Raw
ppm Wet
250
1210
8340
1170
1940
860
2310
280
30
60
270
790
300
130
2070
180
1420
1200
470
350
150
420
750
170
530
Dilute
ppm
117
1848
219
120
117
1
1085
5
1
77
17
45
8
5
2240
17
1394
4
25
2922
4
3454
18
10
65
Approx . Raw
% Dry
0.30
3.5
0.42
0.33
0.34
<0.01
2.3
0.02
<0.01
0.21
0.04
0.08
0.02
<0.01
3.9
0.04
2.5
0.01
0.04
5.1
<0.01
5.9
0.04
0.02
0.14
Dilute
%
0.45
0.47
0.45
0.43
0.37
0.49
0.44
0.41
0.34
0.42
0.54
0.70
0.55
0.53
0.47
0.54
0.55
0.62
0.72
0.39
0.56
0.35
0.55
0.56
0.56
Approx . Raw
% Wet
11.4
8.9
8.7
11.7
10.9
11.7
9.2
11.5
11.5
11.6
12.0
12.1
11.8
11.8
8.1
12.0
9.9
12.0
12.1
6.8
11.7
5.9
11.8
12.1
11.9
Test
No. Configuration
114-1 Unmodified
111-2 Rich Best Idle
112-2 12% Misfire
113-2 Disabled EGR
114-2 High Oil Consumption
121-1 Unmodified
121-2 Rich Best Idle
122-2 12% Misfire
123-2 Disabled EGR
124-2 High Oil Consumption
131-1 Unmodified
131-2 Rich Best Idle
132-2 12% Misfire
133-2 Disabled EGR
135-2 No Air Inj. + R.B.I.
141-1 Unmodified
141-3 Rich Best Idle
142-2 12% Misfire
143-2 Disabled EGR
145-2 No Air Inj. + R.B.I.
152-1 Unmodified
151-2 Rich Best Idle
152-3 12% Misfire
153-2 Disabled EGR
154-2 High Oil Consumption
Note: Idle values were taken during seconds 153 to 163 in the Hot-Start UDDS of the FTP (in some
configurations other idles produced different values).
-------
The regulated emissions and the fuel consumption values repeated well.
Based on the particulate weight on the filter and the total and sample
flow rates, the total calculated exhaust particulate rates for these evalua-
tions came out to be considerably lower than the rates calculated in the
total particulate evaluations, which utilized glass fiber filters. It should
be emphasized that these evaluations utilized a different filter material and
that these comparisons are also based on different runs.
An in-house study of particulate collection efficiency using various
filtration media was conducted in early 1978 using diesel exhaust. In that
study, the particulate collected on Pallflex filters was consistently lower
than that collected on glass fiber filters. At low-power modes the weight
gain on the Pallflex filter was less than half the weight gain on a glass
fiber filter, whereas, as the engine power output was increased, the dif-
ference decreased. The findings in the previous in-house study and in this
malfunction project are in general agreement in that the particulate weight
gain with Pallflex filters has generally been lower than the weight gain with
glass fiber filters. It has not been determined, however, whether the reason
is the same for gasoline engine exhaust as for diesel exhaust. A definite
relationship for the exhaust particulate collection efficiencies of these
two filter medias remains to be established.
49
-------
VI. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS
This section reports the analyses performed on the emissions data
generated in this project. These analyses involved averaging and refor-
matting to enable making various comparisons of the data. Due to the very
limited number of data points for each emission at each specific condition,
advanced statistical analyses were judged to be inapplicable. Another
limitation of further analyses was that no criteria were available to enable
establishing acceptable or unacceptable concentrations of each emission in
the exhaust. This precluded establishing the significance of the changes in
emission levels that occurred. For example, a hundredfold increase in one
emission does not necessarily represent a greater hazard than a tenfold, or
possibly even lesser, increase in another emission.
Therefore, this section presents the data in formats that enable ready
review and comparison. It is generally left up to the individual readers to
apply their own interpretation as to the significance of the changes in the
emission levels under the various operating conditions.
A. Average Values for the Unmodified Configuration
The initial analyses of the data involved averaging of the four evalua-
tions conducted with each car in the unmodified configuration (i.e., tuned-up
to manufacturer's specifications). These averages, along with the maximum
and minimum values, are presented in Appendix F.
Car 11 did not have an oxidation catalyst, Cars 12 and 15 had an oxida-
tion catalyst but no air pump, and Cars 13 and 14 had an oxidation catalyst
and an air pump. The average emission results, in the unmodified configuration
for these three car groupings, are given in Table 13. The non-catalyst Car 11
produced the highest levels of total and individual hydrocarbons, carbon mon-
oxide, oxides of nitrogen, particulates, aldehydes and cyanides and the
lowest level of nitrous oxide. The catalyst cars not having an air pump,
Cars 12 and 15, produced the highest level of nitrous oxide and the lowest
levels of particulates. The catalyst cars having an air pump, Cars 13 and 14,
produced the highest levels of sulfates and the lowest levels of carbon
monoxide. In general, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide were consistently
higher for the FTP than for the SET and HFET with all five cars. This appa-
rently resulted from the fact that the SET and HFET are hot-start tests which
begin with a hot catalyst.
B. Average Values for the Malfunction Configuration
The average values for the unmodified configuration, along with the
average values for the malfunction configurations, are given in Appendix G.
50
-------
TABLE 13. AVERAGE VALUES FOR UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
In mg/km, Except as Noted
FTP SET
Car
11
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) ,g/km
Carbon Monoxide , g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.
11.
1.
31.
0.
13.
316.
0.
0.
3.
2.
0.
0.
3.
73
14
21
3
68
38
20
03
05
35
04
00
Cars
12&15
0.
4.
0.
5.
0.
2.
141.
0.
<0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
34.
32
47
89*
8
77*
20*
37*
01
06
54
06*
00
Cars
13&14
0.23*
1.82
0.83*
5.5 *
0.94*
2.82*
101.
0.18*
0.02*
3.64*
0.17*
0.00
0.00
18. *
Car
11
0.37
3.65
1.24
14.8
0.32
14.00
138.
0.07
0.02
—
0.79
0.00
0.00
3.
Cars
12&15
0.08
0.87
0.94
2.3 *
0.31*
1.20*
46.
0.20
0.01
—
0.10
0.05*
0.00
25.
Cars
13&14
0.07
0.56*
0.65*
4.7
3.27
1.6 *
39.
0.08
0.00
—
0.03
<0.01
0.00
6. *
Car
11
0.31
2.11
1.40
12.9
0.24
16.6
161.
0.07
0.01
—
1.60
0.00
0.00
4.
Cars
12&15
0.05
0.43
0.98
1.7 *
0.39*
1.1
32.
0.10*
0.03*
—
0.11*
0.19**
0.00
16.
Cars
13&14
0.06
0.23
0.64*
7.5 *
5.53*
1.5
37.
0.08
0.00
—
0.08
<0.01
0.00
3.
Car 11 - Non-catalyst car with an air pump.
Cars 12 & 15 - Catalyst without an air pump.
Cars 13 & 14 - Catalyst with an air pump.
*Relatively large variation in the data.
**Extremely large variation in the data.
-------
No method was found to further condense all of these averaged data into a
single meaningful table or figure. Therefore, various results were sepa-
rated out and are discussed in the following sections.
C. Analyses of Regulated Emissions and Fuel Consumption
The analyses of the regulated emissions and fuel consumption results
were straightforward since test-to-test repeatability was generally good.
A summary of the regulated emissions and fuel consumption data is presented
in Table 14. These data are discussed separately as follows:
FTP Regulated Emissions - Hydrocarbons emissions were higher under con-
ditions of "rich best idle" and 12 percent misfire. The highest value (10.8
gAm) was obtained with the 1977 AMC Pacer operating with 12 percent misfire.
This car does not have a catalyst. The higher values for carbon monoxide
generally occurred with the "rich best idle" operating condition. Disabled
EGR produced the higher values for oxides of nitrogen. The highest values
for oxides of nitrogen (4 gAm) occurred with the two Ford cars operating
without EGR.
Hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide emissions were increased with all mal-
functions except disabled EGR. Oxides of nitrogen emissions increased only
with the 12 percent misfire and the disabled EGR configurations. The values
obtained for the regulated emissions, with the five cars, are compared to
the light-duty emissions standards as follows:
Number Exceeding 1977 and 1978 Emission Standards
Rich High No. Air
Best Disabled Oil Inj. &
Unmod. Idle Misfire EGR Cons. R.B.I.
Hydrocrabons
Carbon Monixide
Oxides of Nitrogen
0
2
4
5
la
0
l/3a
2/3
0.3
2/2
2/2
0/2
Emission standard exceeded with the car that did not have a catalyst
As shown, all cars exceeded the hydrocarbon standard with the 12 percent mis-
fire malfunction configuration. Four of the five exceeded the carbon monoxide
standard at "rich best idle" and exceeded the oxides of nitrogen standard with
the disabled EGR.
Fuel Consumption - Fuel consumption results, in the unmodified configu-
ration, generally repeated reasonably well. These data are summarized as
follows:
52
-------
TABLE 14. SUMMARY OF AVERAGE FTP REGULATED EMISSIONS
AND FUEL CONSUMPTION DATA
Malfunction
Unmodified
Car 11, AMC Pacer
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.7
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 11.1
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 1.2
Fuel Cons., £/100 km 14.5
Car 12, Malibu
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.3
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 5.5
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 0.8
Fuel Cons., i/100 km 13.7
Car 13, Malibu Calif.
Hydrocarbons, g/km o.2
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 2.2
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 0.4
Fuel Cons., 1/100 km 17.4
Car 14, Granada
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.3
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 1.5
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 1.2
Fuel Cons., &/100 km 15.2
Car 15, Mustang II
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.3
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 3.3
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 1.0
Fuel Cons., &/100 km 14.9
Rich
Best 12%
Idle Misfire
0.8
20.8
1.2
15.7
1.1
26.0
0.6
14.7
0.2
3.4
0.4
19.0
0.6
19.7
0.6
17.2
2.2
47.0
0.8
17.2
10.8
14.5
1.7
15.6
1.8
6.8
0.9
14.5
1.1
2.3
0.7
17.8
1.7
2.0
1.7
16.1
1.6
3.9
1.3
16.7
High
Disabled Oil
EGR Cons.
0.8
12.6
2.3
14.3
0.3
6.3
1.1
13.2
0.2
1.6
1.4
15.2
0.4
1.9
4.1
15.5
0.3
2.6
4.2
15.1
1.1
24.7
1.2
15.0
0.6
10.8
0.6
13.9
0.5
5.7
0.9
15.4
R.B.I. &
Disabled
Air Pump
1.2
52.9
0.3
17.9
2.3
50.6
0.6
16.4
Note: Values given are the average of up to four tests for the unmodified
and two tests for the malfunction conditions.
53
-------
Unmodified Vehicle Fuel Consumption
Repeatability, H/100 km
Car
11
12
13
14
15
15
MODS a
14.7-15.2
15.8-16.7
19.6-20.6
15.2-15.9
14. 9-17. 3b
14.8-15.3°
FTPa
13.6-14.9
13.1-14.0
17.0-17.6
14.9-15.9
14. 9-18. 2b
14. 9-15. lc
SETa
10.9-11.8
10.2-10.9
13.2-14.0
11.5-12.2
12.0-12.8
12.0-12.1°
HFETa
9.9-10.9
9.3-9.8
11.0-12.1
10.0-11.4
10. 5-11. 7b
10.5-11.3°
a
. Minimum and maximum for four tests
t>
Difference exceeds ten percent - in each case the first test produced
the highest fuel consumption
Excluding the initial unmodified configuration evaluations
With Car 15 the fuel consumption was relatively high on the initial MODS road
operation and on the initial unmodified test sequence. The regulated emissions,
however, were not sufficiently different to identify the cause for this large
a variation in fuel consumption.
Exclusive of the initial Car 15 unmodified test sequence evaluations,
the percentage difference between the minimum and maximum fuel consumption
values, for all unmodified and malfunction evaluations, were as follows:
(Maximum - Minimum)/Avergae, in percent^
MODS FTP SET HFET
Lowest
Highest
5-Car Average
This amount of variation for this type of operation is considered to be very
good for the MODS, FTP and SET operation and acceptable for the HFET.
D. General Effects of Malfunctions on Emissions
In this section an attempt has been made to give the reader a general
idea of the effects of car and malfunction configuration on emissions. Due
to the diversity of cars evaluated and the lack of established levels of
significance for the unregulated emissions, it can not be established at
this time whether or not any of the changes in emissions levels are a defi-
nite cause of concern.
An evaluation that can provide some insight is whether the respective
malfunctions caused increases in emissions relative to the unmodified confi-
guration. The results of such an evaluation for the FTP results are summarized
54
3%
6%
4%
1%
9%
5%
1%
8%
5%
5%
13%
9%
-------
in Table 15. Hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide increased with essentially all
of the malfunction conditions evaluated, except disabled EGR. Oxides of ni-
trogen increased with the 12 percent misfire and the disabled EGR.
TABLE 15. RELATIONSHIP OF MALFUNCTION TO UNMODIFIED EMISSION RESULTS
Number of Cars for Which Emissions Increased out of the
Total Cars Evaluated in that Configuration
No Air
12% Disabled High Oil Injt.
Misfire EGR Consump. R.B.I.
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km 4/5 5/5
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 5/5 5/5
Oxides of Nitrogen, gAm 0/5 5/5
Particulates
Total Particulates 2/4 4/5
Sulfate 1/5 2/5
Compound Group Totals
Aldehdyes & Ketones 4/5 5/5
Individual Hydrocarbons 4/4 2/2
Organic Sulfides 2/3 2/4
Organic Amines*5 5/5 1/4
Other Compounds
Ammonia 3/5 3/5
Cyanide & Cyanogen 4/5 3/5
DMNAC
a
5/5
3/5
0/5
5/5
1/2
0/3
2/5
2/5
5/5
3/3
3/3
0/3
3/3
3/3
1/3
1/3
1/3
2/2
2/2
0/2
2/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/1
1/1
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl^
Nitrous Oxide
Other Elements0
4/5
2/5
1/5
2/3
1/5
3/3
1/3
0/1
2/2
1/2
Changes were relatively minor and inconsistent
Changes in organic amines were relatively minor
Discussed separately
No nickel carbonyl was detected for any configuration evaluated
E. Other Elements and DMNA
An illustrative summary of the elemental analyses results, for the FTP
evaluations, is given in Table 16. As shown in this table, the emission levels
of phosphorus, barium, magnesium, chlorine and zinc were associated with the
rate of lubricant consumption. Measurable quantities of aluminum were found
55
-------
P Al
=0.02
0.5
0.01
0.03
0.02
S
=0.04
0.05
0.04
0.08
0.02
0.1
0.01
0.03
0.03
Fe Ba
0 to 0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4 0.7
<0.1
0.5
0.1
Mg Cl Zn
0.25 0.09 0.35
TABLE 16. ILLUSTRATIVE SUMMARY OF THE ELEMENTAL ANALYSES FOR THE FTP
Exhaust Emission, mg/km
Test
Task 1
11U
111
112
113
114
12U
121
122
123 0.01
124 0.24 0.01 0.04 <0.1 0.5 0.19 0.12 0.14
13U 0.02 0.2 <0.1
131 0.02 0.7 <0.1
132 0.04 0.8 0.4
133 0.01 0.6 Nil
135 0.02 0.01 Nil
14U 0.2 0.1
141 0.02 <0.1
142 0.09 0.3
143 0.03 <0.1
145 0.01 <0.1
15U 0.05 *
151 0.02 0.1
152 0.1
153 0.02 0.1
154 0.35 0.08 0.2 0.6 0.22 0.23 0.28
P - Phosphorus S - Sulfur Ba - Barium Cl - Chlorine
Al - Aluminum Fe - Iron Mg - Magnesium Zn - Zinc
Test General Description
1XU Unmodified Configuration
1X1 Rich Best Idle
1X2 12 Percent Ignition Misfire
1X3 Disabled EGR
1X4 High Oil Consumption (500 km/litre)
1X5 Rich Best Idle plus Air Pump Disconnected
*High Fe in initial test in the Unmodified Configuration (151-11) makes
the average value questionable.
56
-------
only in the samples from the General Motors automobiles (Task 1, Car 12 and
Car 13). On a cursory basis, there appeared to be a relationship between
the sulfate emission levels and the level of sulfur determined in the ele-
mental analyses. Also, lubricant consumption appeared to have some minor
effect on the level of sulfur detected.
There was no discernable relationship between the engine configuration
and the amount of iron emitted. Of interest, however, was that the emission
level of iron in the first unmodified configuration test for Car 15 was 0.72
mgAm, the highest value reported for any of the tests. That same test had a
significantly higher fuel consumption than did subsequent tests in this same
con figuration.
Lead emissions were not detected in the sample filters, except when simi-
lar levels were also detected in the filter blank or when measurable levels
of bromine were also detected. After careful consideration of all the data
and the fact that all filters were from the same production lot, it was con-
cluded that the lead values should have been consistent, except when lead
contamination of the fuel occurred. With lead contamination of the fuel,
a measurable amount of bromine should be present. Therefore, since bromine
was generally not present for those tests associated with a blank which was
reported to have had a measurable guantity of lead, the measured lead values
for such tests have been omitted from the illustrative summary in Table 16.
Three tests had measurable quantities of both lead and bromine. Results
for these three tests are summarized as follows:
Emissions, mg/km Calculated Lead in Fuel
Test No. Bromine Lead g/litre g/gal.
112-13 0.46 0.70 0.007 0.025
133-12 0.50 0.60 0.004 0.016
141-11 0.15 0.41 0.003 0.010
Although considerable precautions were practiced, it appears that the fuel
used in these three tests may have become contaminated by a relatively minute
amount of leaded fuel. For reference, the lead specification for the fuel
used in this project was that it contain less than 0.01 g/gal. The actual
lead concentration in the fuel was less than the minimum procedural detection
value of 0.001 g/gal.
Since the most significant contributor to these elemental emissions was
high oil consumption, a qualitative X-ray analysis was conducted on the un-
used oil. It was determined that those elements found in the exhaust, when
operating with high oil consumption, were present in the unused oil. No de-
tectable quantity of aluminum or iron was found to be present in the oil.
The DMNA results are summarized in Table 17. These results were based on
single ion monitoring (m/e 74) and interference may result from materials
having background ions of m/e 74 (C2HgN3, C2H4NO2, C2H6N2O, C3H3C1, C3H6O2
or C3H10N2) *•* at tne same retention time of DMNA. Referring to Table 17,
there does not appear to be any definite consistency in the values relative
57
-------
TABLE 17. ESTIMATED LEVELS OF DMNA IN FTP TESTS
Test No. Configuration
113-1
113-2
113-3
123-1
124-1
121-2
122-2
122-3
123-3
132-1
132-2
132-3
133-3
135-2
135-3
142-1
143-1
145-1
142-2
142-3
143-2
143-3
152-1
153-1
152-2
152-3
Unmodified
No EGR
Unmodified
Rich Best Idle
12% Misfire
No EGR
Unmodified
12% Misfire
No EGR
R.B.I, w/o Air
Unmodified
ll
II
12% Misfire
II II
No EGR
n n
Unmodified
12% Misfire
DMNAa
yg/m3 in raw
exhaust*3
0
7
78
0
104
0
96
11
0
78
0
0
0
155
52
0
0
70
0
0
26
31
10
<1
0
52
ng in
cartridge0
0
2
21
0
28
0
26
3
0
21
0
0
0
42
14
0
0
19
0
0
7
8
3
-
0
14
yg/m3 in
sample^
0.00
0.04
0.42
0.00
0.56
0.00
0.52
0.06
0.00
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.84
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.17
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.28
mg/kme
0.00
0.01
0.11
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.14
0.02
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.07
Total compounds detected using specific ion (m/e 74) monitoring,
some or all of which may be DMNA.
Values are for faw exhaust gas, undiluted, calculated from 185:1
dilution factor and 50£ sample.
^ ng per cartridge = ng/£ x 50£ / 185 d.f. = 0.27 x ng/i
ng/H in sample = ng/£ in raw exhaust / 185 d.f.
mg/km = ng/£ in raw exhaust /d.f. x CVS flow / distance x 0.001
= ng/& in raw exhaust / 11.1 x 285 m3 / 17.85 km x 0.001
= 0.00144 x ng/SL in raw exhaust
Note: ng/i = yg/m3 = 30 ppb for DMNA
58
-------
Unmod. R.B.I. 12% M NO EGR R.B.I, w/o Air
0
0 & 104 0 11
78 — 0
0, 0 & 70 — 0
4 & 10 — 0
—
&
&
&
Si
1 Si 78
96 0
0 — 52 & 155
0 26 & 31
52
to engine configuration. The reported values for each engine configuration,
in units of yg/m^ for the undiluted exhaust, are summarized as follows:
Configuration^
Car No.
11
12
13
14
15
As can be readily seen from these data, there was generally poor repeatability
for the DMNA results. Therefore, it can only be concluded from these data
that additional research is required to confirm the presence or absence of
DMNA in automobile exhaust.
F. Maximum Emission Values
The highest of the averaged values for all five cars were determined and
these data are presented in Table 18. The data listed in Table 18 are the
highest of the averaged emission rates obtained with any of the five cars.
These data are listed separately for the unmodified and for the malfunction
configurations. The last pages of Table 18 identify the car test which pro-
duced this maximum value.
Table 18 is intended to provide some insight into which compound may
be of potential concern. After "threshold levels for concern" are established
for the unregulated emissions, this table will enable ready screening to de-
termine which of the unregulated emissions may be a potential cause for concern;
and perhaps aid in setting priorities for further investigation into possible
hazardous toxicity effects. Further review of the results given in Appendix G,
would then be required to establish whether or not concern is actually justified.
Another analysis considered was the percentage change in emission rates
for each malfunction condition relative to the unmodified configuration. Two
considerations tend to preclude the usefulness of such an analysis: One con-
sideration was that the concentrations for some of the compounds were near the
"minimum detection value". Percentage change for these compounds would be
essentially meaningless. A second consideration was the previously mentioned
lack of "threshold levels for concern".
G. Relative Importance of the Maximum Emission Rates
There are proposed or established automotive source emission standards
for four of the compounds evaluated in this project. Such standards can be
utilized in a comparative analyses of the emission results for those compounds.
For most of the compounds evaluated, however, standards have not been estab-
lished and attempted analyses of relative importance requires the application
of some other available criteria.
59
-------
TABLE 18. HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Emission Rate, rag/km (Except as Noted)
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crot on a1dehy de
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
FTP
Unmod .
0.7
11.1
1.2
31.3
1.2
13
316
0.5
<0.1
5.4
2.4
0.1
0.00
41
9.7
2.4
0.8
<0.1
0.4
0.2
60
83
14
35
5
38
40
60
Malf.
10.8
52.9
4.2
48.2
9.4
124
1354
1.2
0.2
56.6
6.2
0.7
0.00
60
75.2
31.0
10.0
<0.1
5.3
2.1
258
302
48
53
16
96
230
800
SET
Unmod.
0.4
3.7
1.2
14.8
3.8
14
138
0.2
<0.1
ai_ _ia
0.8
0.1
0.00
29
10.7
2.5
0.4
0.0
0.7
0.3
25
46
10
15
1
20
18
22
Malf.
8.1
23.6
5.1
29.6
17.0
152
659
2.1
0.1
29.0
2.0
4.3
0.00
70
89.5
39.9
13.7
0.4
6.3
2.4
99
102
20
18
4
66
103
373
HFET
Unmod .
0.3
2.1
1.4
12.9
8.5
17
161
0.2
<0.1
__
1.6
0.4
0.00
17
10.9
3.8
1.0
0.0
0.7
0.3
22
51
9
16
3
22
20
27
Malf.
7.5
9.3
4.9
25.0
13.8
228
1224
1.0
0.1
13.3
7.1
1.4
0.00
27
150.5
51.0
14.6
0.7
8.8
3.1
49
203
16
24
4
179
172
593
60
-------
TABLE 18 (CONT'D). HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Emission Rate, mo/km
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethy1amine
Diethylamine
T ri e thy1amine
Other Elements
FTP
Unmod.
0.21
0.22
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Malf .
1.06
0.15
0.20
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.00
0.00
SET
Unmod.
0.14
0.09
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Malf.
2.03
0.10
0.44
0.14
0.07
0.08
0.03
0.00
0.00
HFET
Unmod.
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Malf.
1.00
0.15
0.33
0.02
0.05
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Cesium
Calcium
Tin
Antimony
Palladium
0.48
0.02 0.04
0.21 0.86
0.25
0.23
0.35
0.42 0.51
0.72
0.51
0.01
0.06
5.55
0.04
0.19
0.01
0.16
0.32
0.21
0.56
0.02
0.21
0.21
0.05
3.45
0.14
0.01
0.10
0.25
0.03
0.07
0.37
0.03
Note: Values for all spaces left blank for "Other Elements" are 0.00.
61
-------
TABLE 18 (CONT'D).
HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Car Test Number
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotanaldehyde
Hexana1dehyde
Benzaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
FTP
Unmod.
11
11
14
11
14
11
11
12
11&14
13
11
—
15
12
11
11
11
15
11
11
13
11
14
11
11
11
11
11
Malf.
112
135
153
112
154
112
112
121
112
151
151
135
145
143
112
112
112
121,124,
142
112
143
151
151
151
111
152
112
112
112
SET
Unmod.
11
11
11
11
14
11
11
15
11&15
__
11
—
15
12
11
11
14
—
11
—
15
11
14
11
11&15
11
11
11
Malf.
112
135
143
133
133
112
112
135
121
151
151
—
135
123
112
112
112
112
112
112
151
151
151
111
151
112
112
112
HFET
Unmod.
11
11
11
11
14
11
11
15
15
__
11
—
15
12
11
11
11
—
11
15
13
11
14
11
11
11
11
11
Malf.
112
135
143
112
133
112
112
135
121
121
112
—
145
121
112
112
112
141
112
112
151
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
62
-------
TABLE 18 (CONT'D). HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Car Test Number
FTP
SET
HFET
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Mon ome thy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Coppe r
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Unmod.
12
12
13
11
11&15
11
Malf.
121
132
151
111
112
121
112
Unmod. Malf.
Unmod. Malf.
12
15
13
11
11&15
135
132
121
121
112
121
111
15
11
13
15
15
15
135
151
151
135
112
121
111
124
114
13
13
14
132
132
114
154
114
121
114
114
114,124,142,
133,142,152,
154
121
133
114
114
154
124
114
121
114
114
114
121
143
154
133
124
114
113
121&142
153
154
Cesium
Calcium
Tin
Antimony
Palladium
114&152
142
63
-------
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
NOX
NOX
NOX
g/km
0.9
0.25
9.3
4.4
2.1
1.2
0.6
0.25
g/mi
1.5
0.41
15
7
3.4
2.0
1.0
0.41
The data from Table 18 were converted into units of mg/m3 in the undiluted
exhaust and these converted data are presented in Table 19. Table 19 also
lists the Threshold Limit Values for those substances included in the "Registry
of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances".<9) Some additional FTP relative
values for the unregulated emissions are given as follows for reference pur-
poses :
Equivalent Level in
Mass Emission Rate FTP Raw Exhaust3
mg/m3
600
150
6000
2700
1400
800
400
150
Approximate values based on the relationship for the
five cars evaluated in this project.
The conversion from an emission rate in g/km to mg/m was determined by the
total volume of the undiluted exhaust and the total distance driven for each
test. The volume of undiluted exhaust differs for each car and for each mal-
function condition, generally as a function of the fuel consumption rate.
For generating Table 19, and the additional FTP relative values, a relation-
ship was used which tends to correct all data to an equivalent undiluted
exhaust flow rate equal to the lowest for any of the five cars. This was
done in order to equalize the data to a common basis and eliminate the
relative reduction obtained by cars having high exhaust flow rates.
These data are summarized further and compared to the emission standards
and the TLV in Table 20. The values summarized in Table 20 are intended to
provide some possible idea of the relative importance, based on toxicity,
for some of the compounds evaluated. It should be emphasized, however, that
definite conclusions are currently inappropriate for any compounds; except
possibly those for which automotive source emission standards have been es-
tablished. It should be recognized that the hazard level of a compound may
change based on new findings in health effect research. This is especially
a factor when a compound is changed from a toxic concern to a carcinogenic
concern; such as is apparently occurring with benzene and formaldehyde. Also,
some compounds which are considered by OSHA and other agencies as being non-
toxic can have a potential, indirect harmful effect (e.g., nitrous oxide is
one example of such a compound due to its potential effect on the atmospheric
ozone layer). The ambient air standards were also reviewed for possible in-
clusion in Table 20. Due to the varied ways in which the standards are ex-
pressed, however, there did not appear to be an appropriate method for using
such standards in this comparative analyses.
64
-------
TABLE 19. MAXIMUM EMISSION LEVELS IN THE UNDILUTED EXHAUST3
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Participates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Mcthylethylketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetone
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
FTP
Unmod.
500
7,200
800
20.4
0.8
8.
205.
0.3
<0.1
3.5
1.6
<0.1
0.000
27.
6.3
1.6
0.5
<0.1
0.3
0.1
39.
54.
9.
23.
3.
25.
26.
39.
0.14
0.14
0.04
0.01
Malf.
7,000
34,400
2,700
31.3
6.1
81.
880.
0.8
0.1
36.8
4.0
0.5
0.000
39.
48.9
20.2
6.5
<0.1
3.5
1.4
168.
196.
31.
34.
10.
62.
150.
520.
0.69
0.10
0.13
0.04
SET
Unmod.
300
3,200
1,000
12.6
3.2
12.
117.
0.2
<0.1
0,7
<0.1
0.000
25.
9.1
2.1
0.3
0.0
0.6
0.3
21.
39.
9.
13.
<1.
17.
15.
19.
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.00
Malf.
6,900
20,100
4,300
25.2
14.5
129.
560.
1.8
<0.1
24.7
1.7
3.7
0.000
60.
76.1
33.9
11.7
0.3
5.4
2.0
84.
87.
17.
15.
3.
56.
88.
317.
1.73
0.09
0.37
0.12
HFET
Unmod.
300
2,100
1,400
12.9
8.5
17.
161.
0.2
<0.1
1.6
0.4
0.000
17.
10.9
3.8
1.0
0.0
0.7
0.3
22.
51.
9.
16.
3.
22.
20.
27.
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.01
Malf.
7,500
9,300
4,900
25.0
13.8
228.
1224.
1.0
>0.1
13.3
7.1
1.4
0.000
27.
150.5
51.0
14.6
0.7
8.8
3.1
49.
203.
16.
24.
4.
179.
172.
593.
1.00
0.15
0.33
0.02
35
5<=
20"
0.007
4
360
2400
590
6
2400
1800
33
760
65
-------
TABLE 19 (CONT'D). MAXIMUM EMISSION LEVELS IN THE UNDILUTED EXHAUST3
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Cesium
Calcium
Tin
Antimony
Palladium
FTP
Unmod .
<0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Half.
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.56
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
Unmod.
<0.01
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Half.
0.06
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
<0.01
0.00
0.05
4.72
0.03
0.00
0.16
<0.01
0.14
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
Unmod .
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Half.
0.05
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.05
3.45
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.01
0.10
0.00
0.25
0.03
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
\* t
TLV,
mg/m3
—
__
75
100
1
0.2
5C
0.5
—
0.7
__
—
0.2
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
3
d
—
1
__
—
—
e
__
f
0.5
__
Maximum of the average values as given in Table 15.
Derived on a wet basis using the following approximate calculation:
mg/m3 = Conversion Factor x mg/km. C.F. = Distance/Total Volume x Dilution Factor.
FTP a 0.65 SET =0.85 HFET = 1.00
Ceiling value.
0.002 for soluble salts.
0.5 for soluble compounds.
2 for inorganic compounds, 0.1 for organic compounds.
66
-------
TABLE 20. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF MALFUNCTION EMISSION RATES
Maximum
Emission
Rate (MER)
in mg/kma
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons 10800b
Carbon Monoxide 52900
Oxides of Nitrogen 4200
Particulates
Total Particulates 48b
Sulfates 17
Compound Group Totals
Aldehdyes & Ketones 228b
Organic Sulfides 2
Organic Amines <1
Other Compounds
Ammonia 57
Cyanide & Cyanogen 7b
Hydrogen Sulfide 4
Nickel Carbonyl 0.00
Nitrous Oxide 70
Formaldehyde 15lb
Benzene 230
Equivalent
Emission MER in
Standard Undiluted
for 1983 Exhaust in
in mg/km mg/m3 (MEC)
255
2113
622C
124C
7000
34400
2700
31
15
228
2
37
7
4
0.00
60
151
182
Threshold
Limit Value Ratio
(TLV)in mg/m3 of MEC
OSHA(9) Re to TLV
55
9
1
1
10
35
0.007
4
33
5
10
625
300
31e(12)f
156
38(2)
a
b
c
d
e
FTP rate recorded for the regulated emissions
Value for non-catalyst car - Highest HC value for catalyst car was 2300
255 mg/km in California
Proposed for diesel cars
Based on values for some similar or Related compounds as set by OSHA(9) or
Recommended by the 1968 American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists(10)
Value for catalyst cars given within the parentheses
67
-------
With reference to Table 20, the maximum FTP composite emission rates for
HC, CO and NOX greatly exceeded the standards for 1983 (0.41, 3.4 and 1 g/mi
for HC, CO, and NOV). The maximum value for total particulate, however, was
A
less than one half of the proposed 0.2 g/mi particulate standard for 1983
diesel cars.
Also, in Table 20, the maximum emission concentration (MEG) are compared
with the Threshold Limit Value (TLV), as established by OSHA for exposure in
any 8-hour work shift. For many of the compounds listed, it would appear that
the higher the MEC to TLV ratio the more likely the maximum emission rate
would be of concern from a toxicity viewpoint.
The maximum undiluted exhaust emission concentrations for carbon monoxide
and oxides of nitrogen exceeded the TLV by over 100. Other compounds in the
undiluted exhaust, which exceeded an established TLV, include benzene and
formaldehyde (the maximum value of ammonia was approximately equal to the TLV),
As a matter of possible interest, the value for carbon dioxide was over 20
times the established TLV.
For the remaining compounds and compound groups, it was necessary to
estimate an equivalent TLV based on best available data.^9'10' Based on
these estimated values, the maximum levels for total particulates and sulfate
were above the estimated values for an equivalent TLV by factors of 31 and
15 respectively.
In summary, these comparisons of the emissions results with the TLV's
are only intended to provide some relative means of interpreting the data
obtained in this project. These relative comparisons generally apply only to
toxicity and the hazardous characteristic on an individual component basis.
Other areas, such as carcinogenicity and cumulative, synergistic and indirect
effects, must be considered before any definite conclusions can be made.
68
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Dietzmann, Harry E., et al, "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing
Unregulated, Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles", Report EPA-600/
2-79-017, February 1979.
2. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 85, Subpart H,
Sections applicable to 1977 (and 1978) Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles.
3. Congested Freeway Driving Schedule (Appendix VIII in the Recommended
Practice for Measurement of Exhaust Sulfuric Acid Emission from Light-
Duty Vehicles and Trucks, November 1976.)
4. Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (Federal Register, Vol. 41, No. 100,
May 21, 1976, Appendix I.)
5. 55 mph Alternate Mileage Accumulation Procedure (MSAPC A/C No. 37,
December 20, 1973, Enclosure 1).
6. Automotive Environmental Systems, Inc., "A Study of Emissions from
Light-Duty Vehicles in Six Cities", APTD-1497, Final Report to the
Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-04-0042, March
1973.
7. M. F. Chew, "Auto Smog Inspection at Idle Only, Part II: Oxides of
Nitrogen," Paper 710071 presented at SAE Automotive Engineering Congress,
Detroit, January 11-15, 1971.
8. Urban, Charles M. and Springer, Karl J., "Study of Emissions from
Heavy-Duty Vehicles," Final Report EPA-460/2-76-012 to the Environmental
Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-03-2147, May 1976.
9. U. S. HEW "Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances," 1976 and
1978 Editions.
10. Proceedings of the 1968 American Conference of Governmnetal Industrial
Hygienists as reported in the Fifth Edition of the "Matheson Gas Data
Book."
69
-------
APPENDICES
A - GENERAL INFORMATION
B - TASK I MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS
C - SUMMARIES OF THE RESULTS
D - FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
E - COMPUTER PRINTOURS OF THE TEST RESULTS
F - AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
G - AVERAGE VALUES FOR ALL CONFIGURATIONS
-------
APPENDIX A
GENERAL INFORMATION
A-l Modified Durability Driving Schedule
A-2 Analytical Procedure for DMNA
A-3 Calculations for Unregulated Emissions
-------
APPENDIX A-l. MODIFIED DURABILITY DRIVING SCHEDULE FOR
MILEAGE ACCUMULATION ON PUBLIC ROADS
The following schedule is shown on Figure A-l:
1. Leave Institute Fleet Laboratory
2. Proceed to CULEBRA ROAD via INSTITUTE ROAD, 20 & 30 m.p.h.
3. Stop at CULEBRA
4. Left turn onto CULEBRA and proceed to "A", 410, at 40 m.p.h.
(Distance from Fleet Laboratory to "A" is 2.3 miles)
5. Stop at "A", idle 15 sec.
6. Start lap prompter at 1.
7. Accelerate from stop, turn left on access road
8. After left turn, accelerate to lap speed and then decelerate
at "B" to 20 m.p.h., as traffic permits.
9. Accelerate to lap speed as you turn onto 410. Continue on 410
to next exit and then decelerate at "C" to 20 m.p.h., as traffic
permits then accelerate to lap speed.
10. Continue on FRONTAGE ROAD until a full stop can be safely made
at area of point "D". Idle for 15 sees.
11. Accelerate from stop to lap speed and pull onto 410 at next ramp.
Continue on 410 to next exit ramp.
12. Take exit, then decelerate to 20 m.p.h., at "E".
13. Accelerate to lap speed.
14. Stop at "F" and idle 15 sees.
15. Accelerate to lap speed and continue to "G". Decelerate to
20 m.p.h., at "G" then accelerate to lap speed.
16. Stop at traffic light if red, "H" (this can be as long as
33 sees.) If the light is green, proceed and make an additional
stop along the North lap as traffic permits.
17. As you pass "H" stop light, push the "lap" prompter and observe
the "lap speed".
18. Left turn on MARBACH under 410. Stop at light "I". If light is green,
proceed on North lap and make additional stop as traffic permits.
19. Left turn to 410 access at "I".
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A-l (CONT'D). MODIFIED DURABILITY DRIVING SCHEDULE FOR
MILEAGE ACCUMULATION ON PUBLIC ROADSa
20. Proceed up 410 to "J" at lap speed.
21. Decelerate at "J" to 20 m.p.h., and then accelerate to lap speed.
22. Continue to "K" at lap speed.
23. Decelerate at "K" to 20 m.p.h., and then accelerate to lap speed.
24. Take ramp to 410 and proceed up 410 to exit ramp at "L".
25. Decelerate at "L" to 20 m.p.h., then accelerate to lap speed.
26. Proceed to "M", then stop and idle 15 sees.
27. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate at "N" to 20 m.p.h., and
then accelerate to lap speed.
28. Take ramp to 410 and continue on 410 to CULEBRA exit ramp.
29. Take CULEBRA exit to stop at "A". Idle 15 sees.
30. Push "lap" prompter for next lap and lap speed.
31. This begins the 3rd lap.
32. Continue with South lap - North lap sequence until lap number 9
is complete.
33. Lap number 10 is run at a steady 55 m.p.h., on 410. Get on 410
at first entrance ramp following the stop at the end of lap
number 9 and stay on 410.
34. Lap 10 is completed when you stop at "A" or "H" after pulling
off onto the ramp nearest the stop.
i
35. After stop at "A" or "H" Lap Number 10 is complete.
36. Punch lap button for Lap 11.
37. Accelerate then stop at "B".
38. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate to stop at "D".
39. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate to stop at "F".
40. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate to stop at "H".
41. This completes one cycle of the mileage accumulation.
42. The next cycle of the schedule begins at "H".
43. Complete as many steps per shift as time will allow, then
return to Fleet Laboratory.
A-3
-------
Events Per Mile
55 mph Top Speed
Driving Mode
Stops
Normal Accelerations from Stop
Normal Accelerations from 20 mph
Wide-Open Throttle Accelerations
and Fast Deceleration
Idle Time
SwRI Course*
1.02
1.01
1.11
0.00
13. 84 Sec.
AC No. 37
1.01
0.91
1.11
0.10
13.64 Sec.
* WOT accelerations replaced by
normal accelerations.
Light
Institute
Road
South Lap: "A" to "II" - 4.8 km (3.0 mi)
North Lap: "H" to "A" - 4.7 km (2.9 mi)
11 Laps = 52.3 km (32.5 mi)
Loop
410 N.W.
Lap
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Speed
km/hr
64
48
64
64
56
48
56
72
56
89
89
ini/hr
40
30
40
40
35
30
35
45
35
55
55
Figure A-l. Modified (automobile) durability driving schedule
for mileage accumulation on public roads
A-4
-------
APPENDIX A-2. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
The following report summary and description of the analytical
procedure for DMNA was excerpted from a copy of the Special Interim
Technical Report for EPA Contract No. 68-02-2767. The interim
report was prepared by Dr. E. D. Pellizzari of the Research Triangle
Institute for Dr. Ron Bradow of the Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park. The procedure described was used by the
Research Triangle Institute in performing the DMNA analyses reporting
in this final report.
ANALYSIS FOR N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE IN EXHAUST GASES USING A TENAX
GC CARTRIDGE AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY/COMPUTER
EPA Contract No. 68-02-2767
TRI/1514/00-01S
1.0 Introduction
Research was conducted on determining whether N-nitrosodimethylamine
was present in auto exhaust. In conjunction with Southwest Research
Institute, a study was conducted on the detection of DMN in auto exhaust
of automobiles which have been operated under various test conditions.
SwRI was responsible for generating and participating in the collection
of the auto exhaust samples during the course of this program. The
results of this research effort is described here.
2.0 Experimental Procedures
The collection and analysis techniques developed for use in ambient
air modified and used for detecting DMN in auto exhaust gases.
Tenax GC sampling cartridges were prepared at the Research Triangle
Institute (RTI) and shipped by Federal Express to Southwest Research
Institute (SwRI) for the collection of auto exhaust samples and subse-
quent returned to RTI for analyses. In all cases the sampling cartridges
were expended or returned within four to five weeks and replaced with a
fresh batch in order to insure a low background level. All samples were
analyzed within two to three weeks after sample collection was completed.
The sampling procedure employed by SwRI consisted of a primary and
secondary diluter and the secondary diluter and transfer lines were
maintained at 60°C. The sampling rate was 1.6 £/min and the test length
was approximately 31 minutes giving a total sample volume of 50 £. The
average primary cvs dilution was 11.1 to 1 and the secondary dilution
was 16.7 to 1 giving an actual final sample dilution of 185 to 1. The
secondary diluter was necessary in order to insure that the NOX and
hydrocarbon values were at levels which minimized the potential artifact
formation of the N-nitrosodimethylamine on the Tenax GC sorbent.
3.0 Results and Discussion
Table A-2 presents the results obtained on the analysis of 30 Tenax
GC sampling cartridges which were used in the sampling of auto exhaust
A-5
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (CONT'D). ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
at the SwRI Dynamometer Facility. Indicated in Table 1 are the Tenax GC
cartridge sample numbers with the corresponding SwRI test number. The
hydrocarbon and NOX emission data was provided by SwRI. The hydrocarbon
and NOX data was obtained over three time periods throughout the 31 minute
test run. This represents the hydrocarbon emission value data at the
primary diluter only. Thus, the Tenax GC sampling cartridge was exposed
to a 0.06 times this level.
Also in Table 1 are tentatively indicated the DMN levels observed
in each of the samples. The values are given in ng/£ per raw auto
exhaust. The highest levels are observed in samples 3-10 and 3-14
where the levels were 155 and 104/ nq/H respectively. Several additional
samples indicated the presence of DMN and a majority had trace levels or
none at all.
These data were based on single ion monitoring (m/e 74) and the
confirmation of DMN is required utilizing full scan data. Therefore,
the data in Table 1 indicate that DMN may be found in auto exhaust; but
additional research is required to confirm its presence in test runs
which appeared to provide the conditions of maximum emissions.
N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE IN AMBIENT AIR
ANALYTICAL METHOD
Analyte: DMN
Matrix: Air
Procedure: Absorption on Tenax GC,
thermal desorption
with He purge, measure-
ment by capillary gas-
liquid chromatography/
mass spectrometry
Date Issued:
Date Revised:
Method No:
Range: 0.5 ppt - 10 ppb
Precision: +10%
Classification: E(Proposed)
1. Principle of the Method
N-nitrosodimethylamine (DMN) is concentrated from ambient air on Tenax
GC in a short glass tube (1,2). It is desorbed by heating and purging with
helium into a liquid nitrogen cooled nickel capillary trap and then in-
troduced into a high resolution gas chromatographic column where it is se-
parated from interferences. The concentration of DMN is measured from the
mass spectrometric signal at m/e 74 (3).
A-6
-------
Table &-2. ESTIMATED LEVELS OF N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE AND DILUTE
BAGGED HYDROCARBON AND NO EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
FTP TESTS X
Tenax
Cartridge No.
2-21
2-22
2-23
2-24
2-25
2-26
2-27
2-28
2-29
2-30
2-31
2-32
2-33
2-34
2-35
3- 2
3- 3
3- 4
3- 5
3- 6
3- 7
3- 8
3- 9
3-10
3-11
3-12
3-13
3-14
Test
No.
122-2
122-3
152-1
143-2
143-3
113-1
152-2
152-3
132-1
113-2
113-3
123-1
132-2
132-3
142-1
121-2
153-1
123-3
142-2
142-3
153-3
153-3
135-1
135-2
135-3
145-1
124-1
133-3
143-1
DMNAb
(ng/£)
96
11
10
26
31
ND
ND
52
78
7
78
ND°
ND
ND
ND
ND
T(?)
ND
ND
ND
155
52
70
104
ND
ND
a
HC Emissions, ppm
Cl
980
980
114
140
165
140
715
745
86
175
176
212
630
451
110
170
159
173
714
782
129
145
82
211
228
103
145
*2
20
27
18
14
15
53
38
34
19
55
62
17
37
34
17
14
19
15
40
42
21
19
17
121
122
17
12
fc3
94
122
32
39
48
120
146
142
23
110
133
36
66
69
30
30
43
33
147
153
41
44
21
112
108
43
20
a
NO Emissions, ppm
X
fcl
43
38
52
• 172
188
55
60
59
21
111
115
33
29
30
61
44
54
45
69
76
186
182
18
15
16
55
38
*2
25
25
26
99
97
35
36
30
11
37
39
16
19
20
32
28
26
27
45
45
86
85
9
6
—
6
31
14
fc3
36
30
44
176
218
59
46
46
18
122
127
29
25
26
40
48
41
46
59
55
196
190
14
12
11
39
35
Hydrocarbon and NO emission values associated with FTP tests were obtained
by Southwest Research Institute. Levels are obtained from the CVS (1° dilution
only).
Values are for raw exhaust gas, undiluted, calculated from 185:1 dilution
factor and 50 i sample
ND = not detected
A-7
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (CONT'D). ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
2. Range and Sensitivity
2.1 The range of the mass spectrometric signal for the conditions
listed corresponds to 0.5 ppt to 10 ppb.
2.2 A concentration of 0.5 ppt of DMN can be determined in a 150-liter
air sample.
3. Interferences
Interferences may result from materials having background ions of m/e
74 (C2HsN3, C2H4NO2, C2H6N2O, C3H3C1, C3H6S, CsHeO?, or C3H10N2) if at the~
same retention time of DMN.
4. Precision and Accuracy
4.1 The precision of this method has been determined to be +10%
of relative standard deviation when replicate sampling cartridges
were spiked with 50 ng (corresponding to 10 ppb in 150 £ of air).
These data were obtained using 10.0 cm long glass tubes (1.5 cm
i.d.) packed with 35/50 mesh of Tenax GC (bed dimensions:
1.5 cm X 6 cm in depth).
4.2 The accruacy of the analysis is approximately +10% of the amount
reported as determined from repeated analysis of several standards.
5. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Method
5.1 The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry technique interfaced
with a Finnigan glass jet separator (Model 01512-42158 Finnigan
Corp., Sunnyvale, CA) is extremely sensitive and specific for the
analysis of DMN. The high resolution gas chromatographic
separation yields a retention time that is characteristic for DMN,
and relatively specific for positive assignment of the signal
as DMN. The mass spectrometer in combination with high resolution
gas chromatography yields a very high degree of specificity. The
base peak of DMN is at m/e_ 74 which is also the parent ion. In
order to assign the signal at m/e_ 74 to DMN it is absolutely
necessary that the retention time matches with the- signal.
5.2 Collected samples can be stored upto 1 month with less than 10%
losses.
5.3 Because DMN is a suspected carcinogen in man it is extremely
important to exercise safety precautions in the preparation and
disposal of liquid and gas standards, cleaning of used glassware,
etc., and the analysis of air samples.
5.4 Since the mass spectrometer can not be conveniently mobilized,
sampling must be carried out away from the instrument.
5.5 High resolution gas chromatography/low resolution mass spectrometry
is not a convenient technique for handling a large number of samples,
A-8
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (CONT'D). ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
5.6 Efficiency of air sampling increases as the ambient air tempera-
ture decreases (i_.e_. sensitivity increases) .
5.7 Ambient air sampling is limited to cases where the NOX levels
are less than 3 ppm when dimethylamine is also present.
A-9
-------
APPENDIX A- 3. CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
This appendices documents the calculational methods used for
the unregulated emissions. All values not defined (i.e., CVS FLOW,
VOL, etc.) are obtained from the computer printouts for the regulated
emissions. Example printout is included as Table 1.
A. Individual Hydrocarbons, Nickel Carbonyl, N2O and H2S
1. For FTP Evaluations only, convert 2-Bag UDDS to Equivalent
1-Bag UDDS
PPM 12 = PPM1XCVS FLOW! + PPM2*CVS FLOW2
CVS FLOW! + CVS FLOW2
PPM3xCVS FLOW3 + PPM4XCVS FLOW4
CVS FLOW3 + PPM FLOW4
2 . Convert PPM to yg/m3 :
yg/m3 = 35.32XDENSITYXPPM
Density, g/ft3
Methane CH4
Ethylene C2H4
Ethane C2Hg
Acetylene C2H2
H2S
NH3
- 18.86
- 16.50
- 17.68
- 15.33
- 40.12
- 20.05
Propane C3Hg
Propylene C3H(
Benzene CgHg
Toluene C7Hg
N20
Ni(CO)4
- 17.29
5 - 16.50
- 15.33
- 15.49
- 51.82
- 200.99
B. Calculation of mg/km
mg/km = ((EXHXSCF - BGXDFC)xVOL7-KM)vlOOO
• Calculations were performed using a Hewlett Packard HP-65
Programmable Calculator
* Dry (DFC) and (SCF) was used for all unregulated emissions
except: IHC, N2O and Ni (CO) 4
• DFC and SCF are obtained from the computer print-out for
regulated emissions. (See Tables 1 and 2,)
C. Metals and Other Elements
COMPONENT WEIGHT ON FILTER = yg/cm2 * EFF. FILTER AREA
EFF. FILTER AREA =14.3 cm2
COMPONENT pg/m3 = C.W.O.F. T TOTAL WT. x (yg/m3 for Total Wt.)
A-10
-------
APPENDIX A-3 (CONT'D) . CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
D. Calculation of Average Temperature and Oxygen
= % For Oxygen
= MV for Catalyst Temperature
E. Calculation For 4-FTP
Composite 4-FTP = 0.43x(Value for 1&2) + 0.5?x(Value for 3s4)
A-ll
-------
APPENDIX A-3 (CONT'D). CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
TABLE 1. COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE FOR FOUR-BAG FTP
PVM -
FTP VFHICLE EMISSIONS BfcSULTS - MALFUNCTION CONDITION
PROJECT
TEST NO.
VEHICLE
ENGTNF L{
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH KG(
RUN
LB3)
BAROMETER MM HG ( IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY PCT
BAG RESULTS
HAG «JUMDFR
DESCRIPTION
VEHICLE NO,
DATE
RAG CART NO.
OYNO NP.
CVS NO.
ORV BULB TMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
1
COLD TRANSIENT
TEST WEIGhl
ACTUAL RDAl> i
GASOLINE tM.
OOOMETEW
Kfi(
kii(
I •I'i)
HP)
KM(
DEG C(
GM/KG
OFG F)
HUMIDIIY CUHBECTTON F»CTOK
HOT TMANSItNT
RLOHER OIF P '<«. HaociN.
INLET P MM. H?0(JN. H?_o)
IHLET TEMP. otc. CCDEG,
HLOKER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STf). CU. METRES(SCF)
HC S*MPLE MFTER/«»NRE/PPM
HC
CO
cn
SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
HCKGRO METER/HANGF/PPM
co? SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METEB/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
co? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GPAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CR L/lnnKM
RUN HME SECONDS
AVC,. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. T£«P. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEKP. OEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
oFCf WFT (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURtD)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
BAROMETER MM HG
Ht/MIDITY C/KG
OEG C
TOTAL FUEL sut FUR MR/KM
AVG. FXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST »VG. TFMP. OEG c
CATALYST MAX. TF.«P. Offi C
f»-«AG)
CARBON (>IO»ir»E
FUFL CONSUMPTION
HYOROC4RHONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIOf
OXIOE3 OF NJTWOCtN
-------
APPENDIX A-3 (CONT'D). CALCULATION FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
TABLE 2. DEFINITION OF COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE
FOR FOUR-BAG AND SINGLE-BAG
REGULATED EMISSIONS
The following are primarily exerpts taken from the computer program:
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN: Direct printout of an input
CATALYST AVG. AND MAX. TEMPS.: Input converted to °C and printed-out
C DFC = DILUTION FACTOR CORRECTION DFC = FOR WET SAMPLES DFCD = FOR DRY
DF(J)=13.4/( YC2(2,J) +(( YH(2,J) + CC(2,J))/10000.))
DFC(J) = 1 - 1/DF(J)
C CALCULATE DFC, VOL. KM FOR BAGS 1+2 AND 3+4
C DF = TOTAL CVS FLOW / EXHAUST FLOW = AIR + EXH / EXH
C DFC = 1 - 1/DF = 1 - EXH/(AIR+EXH) = AIR/(AIR+EXH)
DFC12 =(DFC(1)*VMIX(1) + DFC(2)*VMIX(2)) / (VMIX(l) +VMIX(2))
DFC34 = (DFC(3)*VMIX(3) + DFC(4)*VMIX(4)) / (VMIX(3) + VMIX(4))
IF(RH.LT.20) RH = 20
DFCD12 = DFC12 * (1.0 - 0.000323*(RH - 20))
DFCD34 = DFC34 * (1.0 - 0.000323*(RH - 20))
C SCF = SAMPLE CORRECTION FACTOR FOR WATER REMOVAL SCF = FOR WET SCFD=DRY
SCF12 = 1.000
SCF34 = 1.000
SCFD12 = (SCFD(1)*VMIX(1)+SCFD(2)+VMIX(2)) / (VMIX(l) + VMIX(2))
SCFD34 = (SCFD(3)*VMIX(3)+SCFD(4)*VMIX(4)) / (VMIX(3) +VMIX(4))
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR:
C TFS = TOTAL FUEL SULFUR IN MG/KM
C TFS = L/100KM * PCT * G/ML * 1000ML/L * 0.01G/GPCT * 1000MG/G
TFS = CBFM * FSWPCT * FPPG * 100.
C CALCULATE 4-BAG EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION
C 4-BAG = 0.43*(BAG1+BAG2)/(MILES1+MILES2)+0.57*(BAG3+BAG4)/(MILES3+MILES4)
DISTA=MILES(1) + MILES(2)
DISTB=MILES(2) + MILES(3)
DISTC=MILES(3) + MILES(4)
HCWM4 = 0.43*((HCM(1)+HCM(2)) / DISTA) + 0.57*((HCM(3)+HCM(4)) / DISTC)
COWM4 = 0.43M(COM(1)+COM(2)) / DISTA) + 0.57*((COM(3)+COM(4)) / DISTC)
CO2WM4= 0.43*((CO2M(1)+C02M(2))/DISTA) + 0.57*((C02M(3)+C02M(4)) / DISTC)
NOXWM4= 0.43*((NOXM(l)+NOXM(2))/DISTA) + 0.57*((NOXM(3)+NOXM(4)) / DISTC)
CBFE4 = 2421. / (.866*HCWM4 + .429*COWM4 + .273*CO2WM4)
A-13
-------
APPENDIX B
TASK 1 MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS
TABLE B-l Summary of the Results
TABLES B-2 through B-5 Individual Sample Results
TABLES B-6 through B-19 Computer Print-Outs
Notes: 1. A double dash (—) means no valid data were available.
2. Measured values were 0.00 mg/km for all spaces
left blank for Other Elements.
-------
TABLE B-l. SUMMARY OF THE TASK 1 COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS IN MG/KM (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
Test Number,
PVMT-R
Barometer, mm, Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., A/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons g/km
to Carbon Monoxide g/km
NJ Oxides of Nitrogen g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes and Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide and Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
10A1-1
741.7
10.4
25.6
33.81
—
—
—
352.2
15.35
0.33
4.12
0.82
15.89
0.21
0.61
13.8
124.3
0. 14
0.00
2.10
0.24
o.oo
—
—
Baseline
10A1-2
735.1
12.2
23.3
33.47
—
—
—
347.8
15.20
0.31
4.72
0.80
15.83
0.17
0.51
1.7
148.6
0.07
0.00
1.32
0.58
0.00
0.00
12.81
10A1-3
742.4
8.8
24.4
33.14
6.55
—
423
346.1
15.05
0.29
3.56
0.75
7.14
0.11
0.32
138.5
o.oo
o.oo
— —
^._
0.00
o.oo
9.67
Rich
Best
Idle
10B1
735.6
11.2
23.9
34.39
3.60
—
418
304.4
15.62
2.09
34.95
0.59
22.55
0.25
0.72
10.9
1141.9
—
0.00
9.25
2.27
0.38
o.oo
24.66
Ignition Timing
No EGR
10C1
740.9
8.0
23.3
29.55
5.15
—
423
308.0
13.42
0.32
3.41
2.20
9.96
0.10
0.34
6.5
144.0
—
0.00
0.62
0.98
o.oo
0.00
29.35
5° Ret
10D1
743.5
9.7
23.9
34.24
4.20
401
474
355.5
15.55
0.29
5.02
0.62
7.15
0.19
0.55
4.9
150.2
—
0.00
0.74
0.43
o.oo
o.oo
8.29
8° Adv
10D2
739.1
11.6
22.8
30.91
4.25
374
448
322.4
14.04
0.32
3.52
1.08
7.35
0.16
0.52
2.2
139.3
0. 25
0.00
0.72
0.65
o.oo
0.00
12.39
Dirty
Air
Filter
10E1
731.8
12.0
23.9
31.79
4.05
390
466
330.1
14.43
0.35
4.42
0.68
5.04
0.10
0.30
155.1
0.46
0.00
2.97
0.80
0.00
0.00
9.40
Misfire
7%
10F1
734.1
7.5
21.7
32.85
3.75
433
524
337.4
14.92
1.31
5.04
0.79
6.76
0.18
0.55
9.9
240.0
0.25
0.00
1.32
0.31
0.00
o.oo
10.58
12%
10F2
735.6
9.4
23.3
34.02
3.80
469
572
345.6
15.45
2.01
6.38
0.92
7.26
0.33
0.97
18.4
228.8
0 11
0.03
5.05
0.34
0.00
o.oo
11.57
-------
TABLE B-l (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF THE TASK 1 COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS IN MG/KM (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
Test Number,
PVMT-R
w
u>
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC,
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC,
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
10A1-1
3.26
1.65
6.00
1.88
0.71
0.28
13.8
4.2
39.88
25.46
11.88
5.01
1.45
11.88
8.96
19.77
124.3
37.6
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Baseline
10A1-2
1.41
0.00
o.oo
0.05
0.00
0.19
1.7
0.5
54.02
29.71
16.67
5.98
1.99
13.96
12.10
14.13
148.6
47.9
0.07
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
10A1-3
— —
50.08
25.66
16.49
5.50
1.56
12.56
9.41
17.24
138.5
47.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Rich
Best
Idle
10B1
4.62
5.43
o.oo
0.78
0.05
0.06
10.9
0.5
326.2
388.5
43.73
8.41
2.97
104.32
102.61
165.13
1141.9
54.6
—
—
—
o.oo
o .00
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
Ignition Timing
No EGR
10C1
6.01
0.00
0 .00
o.oo
0.00
0.46
6.5
2.0
46.29
21.90
11.29
6.40
0.36
11.04
13.23
33.47
144.0
45.0
__
—
—
—
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
o.oo
5° Ret
10D1
1.76
0.00
o.oo
2.99
0.09
0.09
4.9
1.7
61.24
27.25
12.02
6.27
1.40
11.85
12.05
18.10
150.2
51.8
„
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
8° Adv
10D2
1.20
0.64
0-00
0.10
0.12
0.15
2.2
0.7
55.99
24.41
14.70
5.98
0.46
11.28
10.43
16.00
139.3
43.5
o.oo
0.00
0.14
0.11
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
Dirty
Air
Filter
10E1
— ~
59.64
28.35
13.67
5.13
1.12
14.26
12.27
20.61
155.1
44.3
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
Misfire
7%
10F1
3.11
3.16
2.69
0.21
0.54
0.14
9.9
0.8
58.24
29.93
12.53
8.72
0.76
17.72
26.71
85.37
240.0
18.3
0.11
0.00
0.14
0-00
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
12%
10F2
3.52
3.40
4.40
0 .00
7.02
O.Ob
18.4
0.9
41.70
33.81
11.40
2.73
1.29
22.00
33.08
82.77
228.8
11.4
0.07
0.00
0.04
o.oo
0.00
Trace
0.00
0.00
o.oo
-------
TABLE B-l (Cont'd.) SUMMARY OF THE TASK 1 COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS IN MG/KM (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Baseline
PVMT-R 10A1-1 10A1-2 10A1-3
Cr
Pb
Mn 0.05 0.05 0.05
As
Hg
Br
P 0.01 0.01
Si
Cd
Al 0.01 0.01 0.01
S 0.05 0.04 0.04
Na
F
Mg 0.01
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe 0.20 0.03
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
Rich
Best Ignition Timing Air Misfire
Idle No EGR 5° Ret 8° Adv Filter 7% 12%
10B1 10C1 10D1 10D2 10E1 10F1 10F2
No
Data
for 0.05 0.09 0.02 0.03
this
test
0.01 0.01
0.03 0.02 0.02 0.04
0.02 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.06
0.02
0.04
0.05
0.14 0.20 0.02 0.29 0.37
-------
TABLE B-2. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS- TASK 1
Test Series 10A1 - Baseline
Test 10A1 - Run 1
Test 10A1 - Run 2
Test 1OA1 - Run 3
CO
cn
Total Participate
Sulfates
Anemia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldeliyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sul fides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monovethylamine
Monoethylamine & dlmi
Trinethyland ne
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
ithylaralne
COLD-UDDS
27.96
0.23
2.38
0.51
O
5.20
2.20
0
0.58
1.66
19.38
0.29
15.96
O.083
0
O
O
0
0
0
O
0
HOT-PODS
6.78
O.19
1.89
0.03
0
1.80
1.23
10.52
2.86
0
17.29
0.28
7.48
COLD-UDDS
27.94
0.20
1.62
1.07
O
3.28
0
0
0
0
0.56
0.21
4.91
0.054
0
0
0
6.69
0.15
1.09
O.21
0
0
0
0
0.09
0
1.04
0.18
1.46
COLD-UDDS
13.56
0.10
HOT-UDDS
2.30
0.11
4.38
0.06
0
0.08
0
0
O
O
0
0
0
Emissions in ppm
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
COLD-UDDS
1
9.09
13.87
2.48
3.37
0.27
7.32
5.63
14.69
0.48
—
2
2.77
0.45
1.12
0
0.16
0
0.19
0
O.18
HOT-UDDS
3
0.06
0.21
0
0
0.05
0.05
0
0
4
2.81
0.41
1.11
0
0.12
0
0
0
O.O8
COLD-UDDS
1
9.78
14.22
2.53
3.99
0.19
7.55
5.72
8.35
0.62
0
2
2.47
0.46
1.12
0
0.21
0.08
0.66
0
0.28
0
HOT-UDDS
3
4.32
2.17
1.98
0
0.17
0.70
0.95
1.19
0.73
0
4
3.65
0.27
1.17
0
0.18
0.03
0
0
0.13
0
COLD-UDDS
1
10.30
13.56
2.43
3.69
0.19
7.20
4.64
7.98
0.51
0
2
2.37
0.27
1.06
0
0
0
0.19
0.07
0.19
0
HOT-UDDS
3
3.93
0.95
1.95
0
0.15
0.27
0.33
0.56
0.52
0
4
2.52
0.26
1.11
0
0.24
0.10
0.37
0.86
0.07
0
-------
TABLE B-3.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS P.ESULTS
Test Series 10D - Ignition Timing
- TASK 1
CD
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Tr i e thy lami ne
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
Test 10D1 - 5'
COLD-UODS
12.93
0.206
0
0.95
0
4.02
0
0
0
0.21
0
0.09
2.04
0
0
0
0
lanitioq Retard
HOT-UDDS
2.79
0.18
1.30
0.03
0
0.06
0
0
5.25
0
52.69
0.09
0.98
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
9
12
2
4
0
6
4
6
1
.96
.34
.03
.17
.19
.16
.72
.94
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
.73
.33
.74
.01
.02
.73
.18
6
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
HOT-UDDS
3
.04
.46
.55
.02
.18
.87
.26
.63
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
.32
.35
.73
.17
.02
.19
.20
0.47
0
0.19
O
0.30
0
0.12
0
Test 10D2 - 8°
COLD UDDS
21.56
0.19
1.12
1.02
0
2.80
0.99
0
0.23
0.11
4.85
0.07
2.9O
0.01
0
0.09
0
0
0
0
0
0
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1
9.80
13.78
2.42
4.05
0.20
7.11
5.55
8.48
0.74
0
2
3.79
0.25
0.98
O
O.04
0.01
0.58
9.90
O.27
0
Iqnition Advance
HOT-UDDS
3.42
0.13
0.42
0.37
0
0
0.37
0
0
0.12
1.59
0.21
0.64
0
0
0
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
4.27 3
0.63 0
1.72 0
0 0
O.01 0
0 0
0.38 0
0.59 0
0.60 0
0 0
4
.26
.16
.99
.14
-------
TABLE B-4. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK 1
Test Series 10F - Ignition Misfire
Test 10F1 - 7% Misfire
COLD-UDDS HOT
Test 10F2 - 12% Misfire
COLD-UDDS HOT
00
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Annonia
Cyanides 6 Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Mononethylamine
Monoethylanine s dinethylanine
Trinethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
13,35
0.21
1.07
6.39
0
6.40
4.93
1.52
0.49
0.48
4.07
0.14
5.45
0.06
0
0.10
0
1.79
0.15
1.51
0.12
0
0.63
1.83
3.57
0
0.58
0.56
0.14
0.95
12.66
0.40
6.09
0.73
0
7.00
5.67
8.93
0
12.43
0.90
0.14
2.87
0.05
0
0.03
0
O
0.06
0
0
0
3.18
0.27
4.26
0.05
0
0.89
1.68
O.99
2.93
O.18
0
O
Emissions in ppro
Emissions in ppm
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
COLD-ODDS
12
1
.47
16.65
2
5
0
10
12
43
0
0
.78
.89
.33
.37
.73
.49
.42
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
2
.62
.34
.68
.01
.17
.61
.26
.26
HOT-UDDS
3
4.
0.
1.
0
0.
0.
1.
2.
0.
0
32
92
61
08
33
36
55
52
4
1
0.
0,
0
0
0
0.
1.
0.
0
.94
.13
.55
.30
,07
16
COLD-UDDS
1
9.39
16.89
3.04
1.84
0.38
11.54
14.45
42.50
0.66
0
2
1.97
0.44
0.46
0
0
0.31
0.69
1.22
0.22
0
HOT-UDDS
3
4.77
2.15
1.42
0
0.21
1.14
4.26
7.19
0.53
0
4
0.97
0.29
0.42
0
0.05
0.08
0.35
0
0.17
0
-------
TABLE B-5. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK 1
Tests 10B1, 1OC1 and 10E1 - Various Configurations
Test 1OB1 - Rich Best Idle
Test 10C1 - No EGR
03
Total Participate
Sulfates
Amonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes t Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Ace taIdehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfldes
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & diraethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Trie thy lamine
COLD-UDDS
27.66
0.217
6.75
3.00
0.412
6.14
8.21
0
0.714
0.105
4.90
0.13
6.29
HOT-ODDS
18.
0.
11.
1.
0.
3.
3.
0
0.
0
5.
0
3.
70
274
13
72
363
48
33
824
42
72
COLD-UDDS
20
0
1
2
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
.01
.15
.45
.06
.08
.17
.34
HOT-UDDS
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.38
.07
.16
.45
.80
.77
Test 10E1 - Dirty Air Filter
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
10.3
0.13
2.74
1.28
O
0.31
0
0
O
1.07
0.07
3.15
0.43
0
0.07
0
0.07
1.38
0
7.78
0.26
1.11
Emissions in ppm
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
COLD-UDDS
1
30.17
44.59
4.98
5.31
0.17
15.95
13.73
29.00
0.56
0
2
32.49
44.74
3.82
0.01
0.26
10.37
11.69
18.21
0.55
0
HOT-UDDS
3
26.94
40.79
5.56
0.22
0.42
11.35
11.11
15.81
1.32
0
4
24.13
30.93 .
3.06
0
0.19
7.59
9.40
12.91
0.72
O
COLD-UDDS
1
8.89
11.90
1.93
4.29
0.16
6.39
5.57
12.67
1.53
0
2
2.83
0.19
0.78
0
0
0
0.93
2.44
0.70
0
HOT-UDDS
3
3.85
0.90
1.33
0
0.06
0.34
0.69
1.93
1.69
0
4
2.34
0.08
0.68
0
0
0
0.32
1.13
0.30
0
COLD-UDDS
1
9.31
14.37
2.34
3.51
0.29
7.78
6.09
11.38
0.71
0
2
3.84
0.25
0.80
0
0.14
0
O.O2
0
0.22
0
HOT-UDDE
3
5.28
2.06
1.76
0
0
0.98
1.00
0.63
0.20
0
4
3.79
0.23
0.89
0
0
0
0.35
0.79
O.15
0
-------
PVM -
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK i BASELINE REG.
PROJECT U-H7M-U01
03
VO
TEST NO. 1DAO RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLOS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.0 L(30S CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVM aulb KG( 4510 LBS)
BAROMETER 743.71 HH HG(as.aB IN HG)
RELAIIVE HUMIDITY (,3 PCI
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLONER DIP P MM. HJOCIN.
BLOWER 1HLET P MM. HaO(IN. HJO)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCOEG. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW ST1). CU. WETRES(SrF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANUE/PPM
MC ecKGRo METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
coa SAMPLE METER/WANGE/PCT
COS BCKGKC METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COa CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
coe MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
COe GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/10OKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. OEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DtG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFCi WET (DKY)
SCFr WET (DRY)
VUL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT IHAD
BAROMETER MM HP, 7<»3.7
HUMIOITY G/KG ia.3
TEMPERATURE DEC C ?•».»
VEHICLE NO. i»
DATE */ >»/78
BAG CAHT NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 8
DRY BULB TEMP, ft .1 OEG C(7b.O DEG f)
ABS. HUMIOITY 1J.3 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 1588 KG( 3500 LBS}
ACTUAL ROAD LOAO R.U K«( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EH-abB-F
OOOMfcTEH al30B KM( ISiHO MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR l.Oh
COLO TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
SIA8ILIZED
71S.3 (as. 5)
7HS.3 (as. 5)
»3.1 (111.0)
»07S1
7b.a (abso.1*)
1*. I/ 3/ 1*1
.I/ 3/ S
ta.s/ 3/ loan
.i/ 3/ a
82. I/ 3/ l.Sl
3.3/ 3/ .05
Hb.b/ a/ »7
i.o/ a/ i
a. as
133
9bB
l.*7
»5.7
5.85
85.83
ao^s.o
7.03
i.no
1».7S
3Si?. 1
i .ai
lb.15
507
0.00
7ba.O (30.0)
7HS.3 (as.S)
*3.S (111.0)
bSSSS
ias.1 (H587.3)
eo.i/ a/ io
11. s/ a/ la
3H.H/13/ 33
a. a/i3/ 2
57. S/ 3/ l.cia
3.3/ 3/ .05
lfa.7/ tl 17
i.i/ a/ i
13.05
S
as
. S7
IS. 7
,b8
».»3
331H.3
t.ll
.11
.78
377.1
,b7
) b . J. b
8b7
0.00
7ba.O (30.0)
7ba.U (30.0)
tl.7 (107.0)
HU51b
75.8 (ab??.1*)
3H.b/ a/ 3S
is. i/ a/ 18
82.5/13/ 8a
1.7/13/ S
t.8.1/ 3/ 1.23
H.a/ 3/ .Ob
aa.a/ a/ sa
i.i/ a/ i
10.83
18
77
1.17
31. a
.7S
fa. 80
ibao.i
•».77
,1H
1.18
-------
PVM - lot
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK 1 BASELINE BEG.
PROJECT 11-»771-UU1
I
(-•
O
TEST NO. 1IIAO RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE S.O LOOS CID) V-R
TRANSMISSION A3
GVM ?0>»b Kf,( »S10 IBS)
BAROMETER 7H1.H3 MM HG(21.11 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ss per
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H?U)
BLOWER INLET p MM. H2o(iN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCDEG. F>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. MEIRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGF/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/KANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAHS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY Ch L/ldUKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT lOAO
BAROMETER MM HG 7-U.»
HUMIDITY G/KG ' 11.1
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.1
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE »/ 5/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.1
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.1
1
COLD TRANSIENT
73b.b (21.0)
73b.b (21.0)
•»3.1 (111.0)
«083b
7b.l (2b81.1)
20. 8/ 3/ 208
1.5/ 3/ 15
SO.!/ 3/ 122h
.!/ 3/ 2
8».b/ 3/ 1.57
».0/ 3/ .Ob
>»».8/ 2/ *5
l.O/ 2/ 1
7.87
115
llbt
1.51
43.1
S.Sb
103.18
2107.8
b.»8
l.»1
17.10
• 3b5.8
1.13
17. Ul
sn?
0.00
OEG C(75.0 DEG F)
GM/KG
2
STABILIZED
7»1.3 (2".S)
7*1.3 (21.5)
H2.8 (101.0)
b17b5
1311.1 (»51t.2)
20. 8/ ?/ 21
13. S/ 2/ 13
37.1/13/ 3b
3.H/13/ 3
51. b/ 3/ l.nb
t.3/ 3/ .U7
Ib.b/ 2/ 17
.8/ 2/ 1
12. bH
8
31
.11
15.1
.b3
*.7b
23b8.2
f.OO
.10
.78
387.0
.bS
IS. 58
Sb8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1588 KG( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 8.Q KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-abB-F
OOQMtTER 213»3 RM( 13c!b2 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR i.ui
5.7b
b.l?
.103 ( .812)
l.OUll ( .17b)
2Ub.2
11.88
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
STABILIZED
7b2,
7b2.
0 (30.0)
0 (30.0)
75.* (2bh3.b)
21.b/ 2/
13.»/ 2/
38.1/13/
2.1/13/
7D.1/ 3/ 1
32.8/ 2/
.I/ 2/
1U.S3
17
33
1.20
32.0
.7b
2.87
lbSt.5
.13
.50
287.1
.81
12.3f
501
0.00
30
13
37
3
.27
.08
33
1
H2.8 (101.0)
b13bH
121.1 C»SS1.5)
11
11.I/ 2/
12.7/ 2/
5.i/13/
58.b/ 3/ J
». ?/ 3/
18,2/ 2/
.I/ 2/
12.1*
7
3
.17
17.•»
.55
13
5
2
.03
.11?
18
1
H.3S
.01
.Ob
.70
15.78
Bbt
0.00
5.75 b.11
.lib ( .105)
l.OOD ( .177)
20t.S
J1.13
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM
AVG. EXM. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C
it.l J
0.00
CAKBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS OHO
CANBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGtN
C/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-bAG
355.2
15.50
.to
».27
. OU
(1-6AG)
( 350.2)
( 15.27)
( .»0)
{ ».0b)
( .81)
-------
PVH - 10* FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK i BASELINE
PROJECT 11-*771-OU1
TEST NO. 10A1 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 ULOS. CUTLASS
EN5IHE S.O L(30S CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 20»b KG( *S10 LBS)
BAROMETER 7»l.b8 HM HG(2S.20 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50 PCf
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. Cu. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
HC 8CKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/HANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
COS MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KH
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVHT 1UA1
BAROMETER MM HG 7*1.7
HUMIDITY G/KG 10.*
TEMPERATURE DEC C 25.b
VEHICLE No. 10
DATE */ 7/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.b DEC C(78.0 DEG F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1588 KG( JSOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD' 8.0 KN( 1C.7 HP)
GASOLINE £«-2b8-F
ODOMtTER 213SU KMC
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .ss
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
SlABILIZED
7*S.3 (2S.5)
74S.3 (2S.5)
»3.S (111.0)
*OfaS7
75.8 (2b7b.O)
15. 7/ 3/ 157
£.!/ 3/ 21
*S.3/ 3/ 120*
.3/ 3/ 7
80. 2/ 3/ 1.47
*.2/ 3/ .Ob
*3.1/ 2/ »3
l.l/ 2/ 1
8.35
13S
11*H
l.*2
12.1
b.OS
100. Sb
lSbb.2
b.O*
1.05
17.58
3*2.*
1.05
1S.S*
SOb
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
»2.8 (loS.O)
bSbSl
12S.7 (*S82.2)
30. S/ 2/ 30
22. */ 2/ 22
33.1/13/ 31
3.7/13/ *
5B.3/ 3/ 1.03
3.7/ 3/ .Ob
17. S/ 2/ IB
.S/ 2/ 1
12. S*
10
27
.SB
lb.7
.7*
*.0b
2321.0
*.OS
.12
.b7
381.3
.b7
lb.3*
8b8
7b2.U (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
*Ub82
75.7 (2b72.b)
3S.S/ 2/ »0
21. O/ 2/ 21
3S.3/13/ 33
7.7/13/ 7
72. S/ 3/ 1.32
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
37. b/ 2/ 38
l.l/ 2/ 1
10.13
21
25
1.27
3b.b
.S2
2.2*
1753. b
5.2*
.lb
.3S
305. b
.SI
13. OS
SOb
7b2.0 (30
7b2.0 (.30
*2.8 (1C
7020*
.U)
.OJ
S.D)
130.7 (*blb.2
25. ?/ 2/
1S.3/ 2/
7.1/13/
b.b/13/
Sb.U/ 3/
3. I/ 3/
IS.1*/ 2/
l.U/ 2/
13.57
8
1
.S*
18.5
• SS
.12
£2*S. i
*.&>
,li<
.02
3bS.e
. 7"
IS.sd
87*
2b
IS
7
b
.SB
.05
IS
1
5.7* b.OS
.SD7 ( .BS8)
1.000 ( .S7S)
205.S
11.83
5.7* fa.Ik
.SI? ( .SOS)
1.000 ( .SBO)
20b.*
11.SO
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KH
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG c
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG c
33.81
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KH
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF MTROGtN G/KM
3-8AG
3S2.2
15.35
.33
*.12
.82
(*-BAG)
( 3-»7.b)
( 15.1*)
( .32)
( 3.S3)
( .8*)
-------
PVM - 10»
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RtSULTS - T»SK 1 bASELJNE
PROJECT H-^771-001
DO
M
to
TEST NO. 10*1 RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.0 LOOS CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN 20-»b KGC HS10 LBS)
BAROMETER 735.08 MM HG(28.S» IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bb PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIP P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLQMER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCOEG. F)
SLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METHES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/KANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
COe GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET CORY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT 10A1
BAROMETER MM HG 735.1
HUMIDITY G/KG 12.2
DEG C 13.3
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE »/10/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(7*.0 DEG F)
AHS. HUMIDITY ia.2 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 1688 KG( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD ' 8.0 KH( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-2b8-F
ODOMETER 21»4U KM( 13i22 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR l.OS
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TKANSIENT
STABILIZED
73b.b (2S.O)
73b.b (29.0)
*3.S (111.0)
»07SS
75.3 (2bS8.7)
1».S/ 3/ 1HS
!.»/ 3/ 1*
S2.S/ 3/ 1213
.!/ 3/ 2
82. 3/ 3/ 1.S2
t.5/ 3/ .07
•»3.1/ a/ H3
l.O/ 2/ 1
8.10
137
122b
l.Hb
»2.2
S.SH
107. H5
2008.3
b.»0
L.O*
18.87
358. b
1.12
Ib.tb
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
bSbSB
128.3 (H530.7)
1S.O/ 2/ IS
11. B/ 2/ 12
Sl.b/U/ »S
l.b/13/ 2
SB. I/ 3/ 1.03
•».b/ 3/ .07
lb.3/ 2/ Ib
.S/ 2/ 1
12. SS
8
tfa
.tfa
15.5
.bO
b.B*
2255.2
3.RS
.10
1.1H
37».3
.bb
Ib.Ob
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b£.0 (30.0)
H2.2 (108.0)
lUbBb
75.1 (2b51.b)
3B.b/ 2/ 33
11. 9/ 8/ 12
Se.b/13/ SO
l.b/13/ 2
71. b/ 3/ 1.30
».!/ 3/ .Db
32. E/ 2/ 33
.S/ 2/ 1
10.27
22
»7
1.2«
31. H
.SS
».07
170t.8
».7»
.Ib
.70
2SS.H
.B2
Id. b8
7»S.3 (2S.S)
7HS.3 (2S.S)
»1.7 (107.0)
bSS35
128.7 (HS1**.?)
17. U/ 2/ 17
11. I/ 2/ 11
2.3/13/ 2
.b/13/ 1
57. 2/ 3/ 1.01
3.b/ 3/ .05
17. 7/ 2/ 18
.B/ 2/ 1
13.27
7
2
.Sb
17.0
.50
.2H
2257.3
*.3S
.08
.at
373.8
.73
15. S7
5Ub
8b7
5.70 b.03
.SOfa ( .BS2)
1.000 ( .S7«)
203.b
11.72
bOb
5.77
BbS
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 33.17
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT -
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
C4TAIYST HtX. TEMP. DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MUNOXIOE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
.
-------
PVH - 10k FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK 1 BASELINE
PROJECT 11-1771-001
W
t->
U)
TEST NO. 10*1 RUN 3
VEHICLE HODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE S.O LOOS CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?01b KG( 1510 LBS)
BAROMETER 712.11 MM H6C21.23 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY IS PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(lN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AV6. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, MET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT inAl
BAROMETER MM HG 712.1
HUMIDITY G/KG • 8.8
TEMPERATURE DEG C ?1.1
VEHICLE NO, 10
DATE 1/11/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. ?
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 DEG C(7b.O DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 8.8 GM/KG
1
:OLO TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30. 0)
7b2.o (30.0)
13.3 (110. 0)
10b3B
7b.2 (2b11.l)
11. O/ 3/ 110
1.2/ 3/ 12
11. 8/ 3/ lObS
.!/ 3/ Z
80. I/ 3/ 1.11
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
1S.O/ 2/ IS
.b/ 2/ 1
8.3B
at
1017
1.11
11.5
S.bS
S0.2b
2005.1
b.10
l.UO
15.8?
351. S
1.07
ih.ia
SOS
l.lb
37b
5.71
.109
i.ooo
2
STABILIZED
771.7 (30. S)
762.0 (311.0)
»3.S (111.0)
btSbO
130.2 (1S<»<».8)
17. I/ ?/ 18
11. 7/ ?/ 12
20.S/13/ ?Q
?.1/13/ 2
Sb.?/ 3/ ,S<»
3.0/ 3/ .05
17. »/ ?/ 17
.b/ 2/ 1
13.51
7
17
.SS
Ib.B
.53
2.57
2251. b
3.S5
.OS
.12
3b5.b
.bl
IS.bS
8b7
1.31
123
b.17
( .S02)
( .^81)
20b.1
11.87
TEST HEIGHT 1588 Kti( J5UU LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.11 KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-?b8-F
ODOMETER 21501 KM( UJbS MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .11
HOT TRANSIENT
SIABILIZEU
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 33.11
AVG. EXH. OXYGE* PCT 1.31
CATALYST AVG. TEMp. OEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG C 123
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTI
HYDROCARBONS (
CARBON MONOXIDE
7b2.Q (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
13.3 (110.0)
•fUfalO
7b.l (2b81.1)
28. 7/ 2/ 21
12. I/ 2/ 12
22.3/13/ 21
3.S/13/ 3
bl.?/ 3/ 1.25
3. I/ 3/ .05
21. b/ 2/ 30
,7/ 2/ 1
10.70
17
17
1.20
21.0
.77
1.51
ibuo.2
3.17
.11
.28
303.8
.72
13.01
505
1.31
123
5.53
.121 (
l.OOd (
IDE G/KM
PTION L/10UKM
S (THC) G/KM
XIDE G/KM
1TROGEN G/KM
7S2.0 (30.
7b2.0 (30.
13.3 (110
bit 18
0)
0)
.0)
13(1.3 (1b02.1)
21. t/ 2/
21 . I/ 2/
5.3/13/
5. i/i3/
S0.7/ 3/
3. IX 3/
Ib.U/ 2/
. ?/ 2/
15.17
1
0
.81
IS. 3
.11
.01
llSS.b
3.bO
.02
.01
337.3
.bl
11.10
8bh
1.11
127
5.12
• Hb)
.183)
11.15
3-HAG
31b.l
IS. US
.£1
3. 5b
.75
21
21
5
5
.88
.US
Ib
1
(1-HAG)
( 337.3)
( 11. b?)
( .27)
( 3.t1)
( .71)
-------
PVM . 108 FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TSK 1 RICH BE3T IDLE
PROJECT 11-1771-U01
I
H1
^
TEST NO. 10B1 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.0 L(305 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH aoib KGC isio LBS)
BAROMETER 735.58 MM HG(J8.1b IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLONER DIF P MM. HSOHN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HJO(IN. H20)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOH STD. Cu. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METEH/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METEH/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, HET (DRY)
SCF, HET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVHT 1081
BAROMETER MM HG 735.b
HUMIDITY G/KG - 1J.2
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.1
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE 1/17/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 13.q DEG C(7S.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.B GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1588 KGC JSUO LBS)
»CTU*L ROAD LOAD 8.0 K*( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-2b8-F
ODOMETER 21S13 KM( 1338b MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.08
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TK4NSIENT
31AblLIZED
73b.b (21.0)
73b.b (21.0)
12.8 (101.0)
1Ub17
75.8 (2b77.0)
31. I/ 3/ 311
I.I/ 3/ 11
85. 7/ 3/ 23b8
.2/ 3/ 5
7B.1/ 3/ 1.11
3.5/ 3/ .05
11 .O/ 8/ H
l.O/ 2/ 1
7.11
302
2253
1.31
10.1
13.22
118.10
1121. D
5.12
2.28
31. 31
332.8
1.02
lb.81
SD5
.bb
37b
5.80
.103
1.000
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
12.8 (101.0)
b1S3S
121.2 (1Sfa2.2)
21. I/ 3/ 211
2.2/ 3/ 22
71. e/ 3/ IBbl
.I/ 3/ 1
50. 3/ 3/ .87
3. I/ 3/ .05
11. O/ 2/ 11
.I/ 2/ 1
12.17
111
178b
.82
10.2
11.81
2b8.fa5
1151.5
2.5b
2.10
13.58
31b.b
.11
lb.7b
8bb
.71
118
b.lb
( .811)
( .177)
2ns. o
11. 1b.
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
13.3 (110.0)
1Ub30
75.1 (2bfa3.3)
20. 8/ 3/ 208
2.3/ 3/ 23
S3.8/ 3/ 1330
.S/ 3/ 11
b3.2/ 3/ 1.13
2. I/ 3/ .01
23. 8/ 2/ 21
.I/ 2/ 1
10.51
181
12bb
1.01
23.0
7.88
111.15
1500. b
3.37
1.37
11. 2b
2fa0.1
.58
12.58
SOb
.71
118
5.77
.118
l.OUO
7b2.0 (30. U)
7b2.0 (30.0)
13.3 (11U.U)
bit 78
128. H (1553.7)
Ib.b/ 3/ Ibb
2.c!/ 3/ 88
SB.?/ 3/ 1178
,1/ 3/ 1
IR.i/ 3/ .83
l.b/ 3/ .117
12. 1)/ 8/ 12
1.3/ 2/ 1
13.11
lib
1112
.77
10. B
10.83
i 1 2 . 0 5
1815. b
2.71
1.7S
31.17
812. b
.11
15.02
8bb
.72
127
b.21
( .107)
( .171)
201.3
11.17
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KH 3H.3S
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT .72
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C >»1B
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
301.1
15.b2
2.U1
3».1S
.59
(1-8Ali)
( 217.1)
( 15.11)
( 1.10)
( 32.11)
( .51)
-------
PVM - IOC FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK 1 PLUGGED EGR
PROJECT 1V-177V-U01
W
t->
Ul
TEST NO. loci RUN i
VEHICLE HODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE S.O LOOS CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM 201b KG( 1SIO LBS)
BAROMETER 710.
-------
PVH - 10*
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TASK 1 BASELINE REG.
PROJECT 11-H771-001
W
t->
cn
TEST NO. 10AO RUN 3
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.U LOOS CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
6VM aO»b KG( »S10 LBS)
BAROMETER 7»2.H-» MM MG(a9.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3b PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER DIP P MM. naouN.
SLOWER INLET P MM. HaO(IN. HaO)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD HETEK/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COa CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. T£MP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, HET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT 1UAO
BAROMETER MM HG 7V8.«
HUMIDITY G/KG • b.3
TEMPERATURE DEG C aa.8
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE "»/ao/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. I
DRY BULB TEMP. ?2.8 DEG C(73.0 DEG F)
A8S. HUMIDITY b.3 GM/KG
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG.
CATALYST MAX.
1
OLD TRANSIENT
7ba.O (3U.O)
7ba.O (30.0)
43.3 (110.0)
HObOO
7b.l (8b88.7)
17. 3/ 3/ 173
.8/ 3/ 8
49. 7/ 3/ iai5
.!/ 3/ a
80. 3/ 3/ 1.48
a.H/ 3/ .OH
54. 4/ a/ 54
.9/ a/ i
8.38
Ibb
llbH
S3.b
7.39
103.80
eoia.b
b.sa
i.ab
17.90
349.0
1.18
It,. 87
505
.81
393
5.77
.9118 ( .9
l.OUO ( .9
Pn
cu
11
FUR MG/KM 38.95
EN PCT .90
TEMP. DEG C
TEMP. DEG C 4bb
a
STABILIZED
7ba.O (30.0)
7ba.O (30.0)
H3.9 (111.0)
b9S74
130.3 (4bOa.B
Ib.b/ a/ 17
8.U/ a/ 8
33.b/13/ 3?
3.8/13/ 4
5b.B/ 3/ 1.00
a.7/ 3/ .04
19. b/ a/ ao
.B/ a/ i
13.34
9
27
18.9
.b9
4.1b
8894. b
4.11
.11
.be
375.9
.b7
Ib.lU
Bb7
.9a
4bb
b.10
OH)
8H)
O • T
.87
CARBI
FUEL
HYDKI
CARBI
TEST WEIGHT 1588 K6( JSUO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD s.o K«C iu.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-ab8-F
OOOMtTER eibSl KM( 13»53 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .87
HOT TRANSIENT
SI AblUZEO
7ba.O (30.0)
7b8.0 (30.0)
43.9 (111.0)
H05b3
7b.U (ab83.b)
eb.o/ a/ ab
8.8/ a/ 9
b9.9/13/ b8
a.8/13/ 3
bb.3/ 3/ 1.19
3. a/ 3/ .05
35. b/ a/ 3b
.9/ a/ 1
11.18
18
b3
1.1H
3H.8
.79
5.bl
159a.b
.1H
.97
a?b.e
.77
11.87
505
.93
***•»
5.77
.9a/ 3/
19. b/ a/
.H/ a/
IH.bfa
7
8
.8b
IB.R
.51
i.aa
aos9.H
.08
.ao
33b.8
.b?
1H. 40
8b8
1.01
4bl
b.ll
.919)
.985)
aob.s
11.88
3-dAG
343. 7
14.97
.3b
» . 3b
.til
15
9
11
3
. 91
.M5
en
1
(4-BAG)
( 331. a)
( 14.47)
( .35)
( H.aa)
{ .80)
-------
PVM - KID FTP
VEHICLE EMISS1UNS RESULTS
PRQJECJ n-«77l-U/ a/ i
13. *8
8
IS
.95
13.9
.57
a. as
aebs.b
3.3b
.09
.38
3b5.1
.5*
is.be
8b7
.9H
HS7
H7H
b.ai
.907)
.9BU)
11.
TOTAL FUFL SULFUR MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C
»tU
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (T«C)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-oAG
3SS.S
IS.bS
.e9
s.ua
.b2
(H-BAG)
( 3»9.8)
( 15.29)
( .a9)
( H.87)
( .b3)
-------
PVM
100
FTP
VEHICLt EMISSIONS RESULTS - TSK 1
PROJECT 11-1771-001
W
H
00
TEST NO. 100? RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.0 LC3DS CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A?
GVN 20»b KG( VS10 LBS)
BAROMETER 73S.lt MM HG(e9.1U IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bS PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H?o)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLUM STD. cu. METRESCSCFJ
HC SAMPLE METER/RANiiE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
COP. GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, MET (DRY)
SCF, NET (DRY)
VOL (3CM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT 10D2
BAROMETER MM HG 739.1
HUMIDITY G/KG' 11.fa
TEMPERATURE DEG C ?2.8
VEHICLE NO. ID
DATE t/28/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 1
CVS NO. 2
DKY BULB TEMP. IS.8 DEG C(73.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.fa GH/KG
DEC. ADVANCE
TEST HEIGHT 1588 KG( 350U LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 K*( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-2bB-F
ODOMETER 2178* KM( 13b3b MILfcS)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTO* 1.03
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
TUTAL FUEL SULFUD
AVG. EXH. OXY
CATALYST AVG.
CATALYST MAX.
73b.h (29.0) 7b2
73b.b (29.0) 7h2
13. 9(111.0) 13
IDbUb
7b.O (2b83.2) 129
lb.7/ 3/ Ib7 18.
1.2/ 3/ 12 11.
IS.b/ 3/ 1103 17.
.3/ 3/ 7 1.
78. 3/ 3/ 1.13 51.
3,b/ 3/ .Ob 2.
59. I/ ?/ 59 22.
. 8/ 2/ 1 .
a.bi
I5b
10*3
1.39
5S.7
b.H5
92.28
1927.9
8.81)
1.17
15.81
330.1
1.51
15.3?
S05
.70
189
381
5.81
.91? ( .BS'O
1.000 ( .975)
aob. 7
i?.oa
.0 (30.0)
.0 (30.0)
.9 (111.0)
b 958h
. 7 (1580.9)
O/ ?/ 18
I/ 2/ 11
7/13/ 17
b/13/ 2
I/ 3/ .15
b/ 3/ .01
I/ 2/ 22
b/ 2/ 1
11.10
8
15
.91
21.8
.58
2.21
aibO.9
5.59
.09
.3b
319.2
.90
11.91
8b7
.88
123
118
b.19
7b?,0 (30.0)
7b?.0 (30.0)
13.3 (110.0)
lUb 1 7
75.8 (2b7b.b)
23. 0/ 2/ 23
10. O/ 2/ 10
9..8/13/ 1
1.7/13/ 2
bl.l/ 3/ 1.11
2.9/ 3/ .01
13. O/ ?/ 13
.b/ ?/ 1
11. b7
11
8
1.10
12.5
.bl
. b 7
1532. b
b.35
.11
.12
2b5.8
1.10
11.37
SOS
.88
3b1
131
S.7b
.tab (
1.000 (
7b2.G (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
13.9 (lll.H)
b9>t 50
129.1 (1S71.5)
Ib.b/ 2/ 17
10. U/ 2/ 111
2.7/13/ 3
1.7/13/ 2
51. V 3/ .90
3.ii/ 3/ .IIS
23. b/ 2/ 23
.b/ 2/ 1
11.79
7
1
.8b
23.0
.51
.15
d03» .2
b.88
.09
.'J3
333.2
. 9b
11.23
8b7
.91
121
110
b.ll
.912)
.97b)
505.2
11.87
3-flAG (1-BAG)
FUI) MG/KM 30.91
EN PCI .85
TEMP. DEG C 37*
TEMP. DEC C 118
CARBON
OIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
322.1 ( 317
11.01 ( 13.
. J2 (
3.b2 ( 3.
1.08 ( 1.
.5)
82)
32)
12)
10)
-------
PVM - IDE
FTPC VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - T9K 1 AIR FLO" REST.
PROJECT U-H771-U01
CO
I-1
VO
TtST NO. IOE1 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE S.U LOOS CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVM 20»b KG( HS10 LBS)
BAROMETER 731.77 MM HG(28.81 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY b3 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. HeO)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
SLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCHGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION 8Y CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. OEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. 0£G. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, HET (DRY)
SCF, HET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT 1IIE1
BAROMETER MM HG 731.8
HUMIDITY G/KC 12.0
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.1
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE S/ 2/78
BAG CART NO. 1
Of NO NO. 3
CVS NO. I
DRY BULB TEMP. S3.1* OEG C(7S.O OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY ie.o GH/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1588
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-2b8-F
ODOMETER 2183b KM(
KG( 35UU LbS)
B.O KN( 10.7 HP)
13bbB MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTUR 1.05
1
lOLD TRANSIENT
73b.b (21. Q)
73b.b (21.0)
t3.1 (111.0)
"Klbb7
75.2 (2bS7.B)
17. 7/ 3/ 177
1.7/ 3/ 17
50. S/ 3/ 12»8
•S/ 3/ S
80. t/ 3/ 1.18
3.S/ 3/ .05
37. S/ 2/ 37
.I/ 2/ 1
8.30
Ib2
1183
1. 1 3
3b.7
7.03
103.71
1171.8
5.52
1.21
17.82
. 33H.1
.15
15.82
SOb
.b5
205
317
5.82
.101
1.000
2
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
13.3 (110.0)
blblt
128. fa (*S*1.1)
21. O/ 2/ 21
It.S/ 2/ It
33.2/13/ 31
3.S/13/ 3
55. 8/ 3/ .18
f.2/ 3/ .Ob
13. b/ 2/ 1H
.I/ 2/ 1
13. bO
8
27
.12
12.8
.5b
* .05
21fa7.1
3.28
.01
.bS
311.3
.S3
1».17
8bB
.85
<*34
Hbb
b.20
( -817)
( .17b)
12.02
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
H3.1 (111.0)
tOS70
7t.B (2b»l.S)
38. i
2/
13.3/ 2/
2.0/13/
bl.l/ 3/ 1
3.2/ 3/
30.5/ 2/
10.bY
10
1.20
21.7
1.13
7.87
IbfS.b
.20
1.37
2B7.2
.77
12.38
505
.83
371
38
13
1b
2
.25
.05
30
20.b/ 2/
13.b/ 2/
5.73
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
H3.1 (111.0)
20
13
3.H/ 3/ .Ub
15.I/ 2/ Ib
.I/ 2/ 1
13.1H
8
7
.10
15.1
.51
1.12
2120.*
3.8b
.10
.18
350.b
.bt
It.11
8bb
.81
t»7
Hbb
b.05
.120 ( .107)
1.000 ( .17b)
202.8
11.78
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 31.71
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT .81
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C 310
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C tbfa
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
3-ftAG
330.1
.'35
t.t2
.bs
(t-e*G)
( 33U.3)
( l*.1^)
( .35)
( !?2)
-------
PVM - 1RF
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TSK 1 7 PCT. MISFIRE
PROJECT U-H771-U01
W
TEST NO. 10F1 HUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 7B OLOS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.0 L(30S CIU) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN ?!)»(, KG( H510 L8S)
BAROMETER 73H.Ob MM HGCes.lO IN MG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY tS PC F
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET p MM. naodN. HSO)
HLOrfER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOHEW REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. KETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METEH/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METEH/KANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
cop SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CU? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
NOX BCKGRD METfcR/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION 8V CB L/100KM
RUM TIME SECONDS
AVC,. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SLF, WET (DHY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER PVMT luFl
BAROMETER MM HG 73H.1
HUMIDIFY G/KG ' 7.S
TEMPERATURE OEG c 21.7
VEHICLE NO. 1U
DATE S/ 3/78
BAG CAKT NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
PRY BULB TEMP, ei.7 DEG C(71.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 7.5 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1588 KGC 350(1 LfaS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 Ki»( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-?bB-F
ODOMETER 21871 KM( 13S9U
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.91
1
OLD TRANSIENT
73b.b (29.0)
73b.b (29.0)
H3.9 (111.0)
H0b99
75. b (2hb9.3)
bR.B/ 3/ b88
l.b/ 3/ Ib
5b.b/ 3/ 1H11
.H/ 3/ 9
79. 7/ 3/ l.Hb
3.7/ 3/ .Ob
49 .O/ 2/ H9
i.o/ a/ i
B.OH
b7H
13H2
HB.l
29!38
118. 1H
195b. 7
b.30
5.13
20. bl
3H1.H
1 . 10
Ib.b5
5115
.70
201
HHH
5.73
.90B (
i.noo (
2
STABILIZED
Jba.o (3o.o)
?ba.o oo.o)
H3.3 (110.0)
b9 701
ia9.1 (H558.5)
3H.1/ a/ 34
15. 7/ a/ Ib
Sl.7/13/ H9
3.H/13/ 3
55. S/ 3/ .97
a. a/ 3/ .03
18. 7/ a/ 19
.B/ a/ i
13. bH
ao
HS
18.0
l.Hb
b.71
2228.8
H.01
.2H
1.10
3b3.9
.bb
15. bH
Bb7
.75
H91
52H
b.12
.900)
.981)
11. 8b
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 32.B5
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT .75
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C •» 3 3
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG C S2H
CARBON DIOXIDE
3
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
HObS7
75.3 (Jb59.1)
b7.S/ 2/ b8
11. 3/ 2/ 11
SO.H/13/ H8
1.7/13/ 2
b7.8/ 3/ 1.22
a.s/ 3/ .OH
35. 9/ 2/ 3b
.9/ 2/ 1
10.89
58
H5
1.18
35.1
2.50
3.92
Ib27.8
H.S7
.H*
.b9
88H.7
.80
12.2b
505
.78
H37
Sib
5.7?
.92H (
i.oon (
H
S1ABILIZE1)
7b?.0 (30.0)
7bg.O (30. U)
H3.3 (110.10
fa9b21
128.9 (H5S3.II)
a3.b/ a/ c3
10. b/ a/ in
B.8/13/ 9
1.3/13/ 1
51. S/ 3/ .90
a.t/ s/ .OH
ao.a/ a/ an
i.o/ a/ i
1H.90
1H
7
.8b
19.3
1.02
I.Ob
203H.8
H.30
.17
.17
331.5
. 70
1H.18
Bb7
.81
503
533
b.lf
.91b)
.982)
20H.2
11. 8b
3-BAG (H-BAG)
KIDE G/KM
OPTION L/100KM
XS (THC) G/KM
3XIDE 6/KM
»ITROGEN G/KM
337. H (
l*.9a (
1.31 (
S.UH (
.79 (
327.9)
1H.H9)
I.a9)
H.77)
.80)
-------
PVM - 10F FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - TSK 1 18 PCT.MISFIRE
PROJECT ll--»77l-001
CO
I
TEST NO. 10F2 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 5.0 LOOS CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN eotb KG( *S10 LBS)
BAROMETER 735.58 MM HG(28.Sb IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER OIF P MM. H80(lN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HJOCIN. M20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. Cu. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METEH/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGHO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C08 bCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
COe CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GKAMS
COa MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GKAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/10UKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG: TEMP. OEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, «ET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCH)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER IflFg
BAROMETER MM HG 735.b
HUMIOHY G/KG 9.*
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.3
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE 5/ 5/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 OEG C(?*,0 DEG F)
AB3. HUMIDITY <*.* GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1588 KG( 3500 L8S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD a.o KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-ZbB-F
ODOMETER 81911 KM( 13blS MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
,9b
i
COLO TRANSIENT
73b.b (89.0)
73b.b (89.0)
»*.* (118.0)
*0718
75.7 (8b73.9)
10. I/ */ 1010
,3/ »/ 30
Sb.8/ 3/ l»lb
.S/ 3/ 11
80. ?/ 3/ l.HB
».7/ 3/ .07
s».a/ i/ s»
.<*/ Z/ 1
7.79
SB1
13»3
1.18
S3.*
*8.<)b
118.39
1«<70.»
7.»1
7.»»
20.50
3*1.8
1.28
lb.<
-------
PVM - 10*
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - BASELlNt ENGINE
PROJECT 11-1771-001
10
TEST NO. 10*0 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS CUTLASS
ENGINE S.O L(305 CID) V-9
TRANSMISSION A3
GVM ?01b KG( 4510 LBS)
BAROMETER 73b.8b MM HG(81.01 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER DIP P MM. H?0(IN. H80)
BLOWER INLET P MM. naodN. HSO)
HLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. ccotc. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO* STD. CU. HETRESCSCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGKD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGHD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/1QOKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC. HET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 10A1
BAROMETER MM HG 73b.S
HUMIDITY G/KG 1.1
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.3
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE S/ 8/78
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. ?
DRY BULB TEMP. 83.3 DEG C(71.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 1.1 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1588 KG( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL RUAD LOAD 8.0 KH( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-2b8-F
OOOMtTER ai1l3 KM( 13635 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
TOTAL FUEL
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG.
CATALYST MAX.
1
:OLO TRANSIENT
73b.fa (81.0)
73fa.fa (81.0)
13.1 (111.0)
lObbS
75.8 (8b?8.8)
Ib.b/ 3/ Ifab
1.3/ 3/ 13
bl.l/ 3/ 1511
.!/ 3/ ?
80. O/ 3/ 1.17
3.7/ 3/ .Ob
10. a/ ?/ HO
l.O/ 8/ 1
s.eo
15S
1173
1.18
31.3
fa.7b
130.01
1171.7
S.Hb
1.17
88.51
3»1.7
.15
Ib.ab
505
.bS
811
-------
APPENDIX C
SUMMARIES OF THE RESULTS
TABLES C-l through C-4
TABLES C-5 through C-8
TABLES C-9 through C-12
TABLES C-l3 through C-16
TABLES C-17 through C-20
Car
11
12
13
14
15
Description
1977 AMC Pacer
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Chev. Malibu (Calif.)
1978 Ford Granada
1978 Ford Mustang II
Notes: 1. A double dash (—) means no valid data were available.
2. Measured values were 0.00 mg/km for all spaces left
blank for Other Elements.
-------
TABLE C-l. CAR 111 - RICH BEST IDLE
1977 AMC PACER -49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
n
NJ
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, 9/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., A/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
FTP
111-11
746.25
9.4
24.4
27.95
6.55
304.9
13.60
0.59
7.56
1.11
36.03
0.36
0.43
16.9
267.0
0. 39
0.06
3.56
1.77
0.08
0.00
2.92
SET
111-12
742.2
9.3
23.3
23.99
5.70
269.6
11.67
0.28
1.91
1.23
14.78
0.39
0.54
8.1
126.5
0.12
0.03
1.13
0.16
0.00
0.00
2.89
HFET
111-13
742.2
9.0
23.9
21.34
4.90
239.8
10.38
0.25
1.68
1.40
14.49
0.28
0.44
11.0
141.2
0.00
0.03
1.28
0.15
0.00
0.00
3.88
FTP
111-21
737.62
8.9
22.8
32.41
3.50
334.8
15.77
0.79
20.40
1.24
27.11
0.33
0.34
19.4
371.8
0.46
0.00
2.65
0.92
0.21
0.00
2.19
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
111-22
736.6
8.8
26.1
25.71
4.15
283.2
12.51
0.25
5.78
1.26
9.13
0.24
0.31
5.6
162.3
0.18
0.00
1.85
0.77
0.00
0.00
3.5
HFET
111-23
736.6
9.5
26.1
22.73
4.65
254.3
11.06
0.26
2.50
1.48
10.73
0.20
0.29
12.6
148.6
0.00
0.00
2.67
2.19
0.00
0.00
4.8
FTP
111-31
732.54
10.1
23.3
32.12
4.25
330.3
15.63
0.82
21.17
1.12
25.43
0.20
0.21
10.9
421.8
0.19
0.17
1.32
2.52
0.00
0.00
3.73
SET
111-32
732.5
8.9
26.1
25.16
4.15
276.1
12.24
0.30
6.24
1.26
8.23
0.14
0.19
18.5
163.7
0.12
0.13
1.27
0.53
0.00
0.00
3.45
HFET
111-33
734.1
8.6
26.7
22.61
4.80
253.1
11.00
0.26
2.43
1.38
9.30
0.21
0.31
4.6
159.8
0.20
0.10
1.17
2.08
0.00
0.00
3.66
-------
TABLE C-l. CAR 111 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
i
u>
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Bisulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
111-11
10.40
3.58
2.14
0.00
0.65
0.12
16.9
2.9
34.05
79.76
6.20
29.43
0.49
36.47
35.61
45.02
267.0
45. 3
0.18
0 07
0. 07
0. 07
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
111-12
6.53
1.17
0.25
0.00
0.10
0.04
8.1
2.9
9.53
46.70
2.48
13.80
0.00
20.57
16.58
16.83
126.5
45.2
0. 04
0. 04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
111-13
7.05
2.11
1.02
0.00
0.63
0.16
11.0
4.4
8.74
51.79
2.33
14.52
0.00
22.41
17.58
23.88
141.2
56.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
osoo
0.00
0.00
FTP
111-21
15.90
3.03
0.15
0.00
0.30
0.02
19.4
2.5
88.76
95.87
6.02
49.39
1.57
38.55
42. 45
49.18
371. 8
47.1
0. 28
0. 04
0. 07
0. 07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
111-22
4.35
1.08
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.009
5.6
2.2
17.80
60.00
2.19
17.57
0.0
22. 3R
20.82
21. 53
162.3
64.9
0.00
0. 07
0. 07
0. 04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
HFET
111-23
9.29
2.90
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.05
12.6
4.8
11.01
56.77
1.85
17.51
0.0
22.82
18.69
20.02
148.6
57.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
111-31
9.34
1.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
10.9
1.3
94.95
95.91
7.40
57.12
1.13
37.64
61.70
65.99
421. 8
51.4
0.07
0. 04
0.04
0. 04
0.01
0.10
0.06
0.00
0.00
SET
111-32
15.27
3.09
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.12
18.5
6.2
23.87
61.12
3.47
18.12
0.13
23.76
25.56
7.66
163.7
54.6
0. 04
0. 04
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.00
HFET
111-33
4.42
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
4.6
1.8
12.98
59.22
2.52
18.72
0.06
23.11
25.51
17.67
159.8
61.5
0.11
<0.01
0.07
0. 01
0.00
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
o Sulfur
£» Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-l. CAR 111 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
0.02
0.09
0.15
0.01
0.01
SET HFET
111-11 111-12 111-13
0.02
0.02
0.13
0.11
0.03
0.01
0.01
FTP
0.01
0.05
0.14
0.02
0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET HFET
FTP
111-21 111-22 111-23
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.08
0.03
0.01
SET HFET
111-31 111-32 111-33
0.02
0.02
0.12
0.07
0.12 0.06
0.02 0.02 0.01
-------
TABLE C-2. CAR 112 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/0 CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
I
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., VlOO km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
FTP
112-11
741.9
12.4
26.1
31.73
5.42
326.1
14.80
0.76
11.65
1.38
28.38
0.15
0.16
7.5
369.
o.io
0.00
1.02
1.98
0.00
3.
SET
112-12
737.9
9.8
25.6
24.88
4.88
264.3
11.61
0.35
4.17
1.15
12.84
0.24
0.32
11.2
141.
o.io
0.00
1.23
0.00
3.
HFET
112-13
737.9
10.7
28.3
23.02
4.66
246.3
10.74
0.32
2.73
1.31
14.60
0.31
0.45
22.6
157.
0.19
0.00
1.75
0.00
4.
FTP
112-21
742.4
11.1
27.2
33.57
7.06
308.7
15.66
10.91
15.04
1.59
48.05
1.14
1.13
82.8
1446.9
0.35
0.24
2.10
0.82
0.51
3.
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
112-22
742.4
10.9
27.8
27.90
6.14
266.5
13.02
8.06
8.27
1.38
28.17
0.97
1.16
182.5
600.8
0.05
0.00
0.16
0.18
—
HFET
112-23
742.4
10.9
29.4
25.43
5.30
245.7
11.87
7.22
6.02
1.45
25.11
0.75
0.98
165.3
1283.9
0.04
0.00
0.29
0.23
3.
FTP
112-31
742.7
9.6
21.1
33.25
6.75
307.5
15.51
10.73
13.99
1.83
48.40
1.07
1.07
164.2
1262.
0.46
0.20
2.06
0.61
0.40
4.
SET
112-32
742.4
10.6
26.7
28.02
6.09
266.1
13.08
8.12
9.25
1.41
30.17
1.03
1.23
121.6
719.
0.09
0.14
0.13
0.09
2.
HFET
112-33
742.4
11.7
26.7
26.38
—
247.5
12.31
7.86
10.17
1.68
24.81
0.90
1.14
290.8
1164.
0.05
O.Q9
0.37
0.05
4.
-------
TABLE C-2. CAR 112 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (CONT'D)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
I
en
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
112-11
5.96
1.17
0.11
0.00
0.15
0.07
7.5
1.0
49.
107.
9.
45.
0.
47.
46.
66.
369.
49.
0.09
o.oi
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
112-12
7.87
2.56
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.19
11.2
3.2
15.
44.
3.
15.
0.
19.
18.
27.
141.
40.
0.00
O.Q8
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
112-13
12.39
6.07
2.21
0.00
1.45
0.47
22.6
7.1
14.
52.
3.
17.
0.
22.
20.
29.
157.
49.
0.00
0.18
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
112-21
48.10
21.92
7.03
0.00
4.40
1.37
82.8
0.8
59.00
123.72
10.77
42.49
4.67
95.96
265.70
844.61
1446.9
13.3
0.34
0.00
<0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
112-22
102.71
48.15
18.84
0.00
9.58
3.23
182.5
2.3
17.42
69.30
5.79
11.18
1.46
61.64
96.38
337.62
600.8
7.6
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
HFET
112-23
101.46
42.66
11.57
0.00
7.10
2.46
165.3
2.3
30.17
209.27
15.60
25.56
2.41
185.09
191.61
624.17
1283.9
17.8
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
112-31
102.38
40.16
12.96
0.00
6.20
2.46
164.2
1.5
56.
115.
10.
30.
6.
96.
194.
755.
1262.
12.
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
112-32
76.18
31.59
8.61
0.81
2.83
1.56
121.6
1.5
24.
80.
7.
15.
4.
70.
110.
409.
719.
9.
0.08
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
112-33
199.61
59.29
17.59
0.00
10.55
3.75
290.8
3.7
38.
196.
16.
22.
5.
173.
153.
561.
1164.
15.
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-2. CAR 112 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (Cont'd)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/0 CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
n Sulfur
~j Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
FTP
0.01
0.02
0.03
UNMODIFIED
SET HFET
0.02
0.01
0.05
112-11 112-12 112-13
0.27 0.70
0.46
0.01
0.06
0.01 0.02
0.07 0.05
0.01
0.02
FTP
0.02
0.10
0.03
0.02
0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET HFET
0.02
0.06
0.15 0.03
0.02
0.01
112-21 112-22 112-23
0.19
0.02
0.01
0.02
FTP
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.01
SET HFET
112-31 112-32 112-33
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.04
0.07 0.03
0.02 0.02
-------
TABLE C-3. CAR 113 - DISABLED EGR
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE. MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
i
co
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humi di ty, g/k g
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxi de, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Participates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
FTP
113-11
743.7
9.4
24.4
31.10
6.27
319.9
14.51
0.72
11.33
1.36
24.59
1.33
1.43
10.0
369.
—
0.00
4.56
3.31
0.00
0.06
3.
SET
113-12
742.7
9.2
26.7
24.45
5.33
261.0
11.41
0.39
3.23
1.30
10.96
0.29
0.40
9.1
—
<0.01
0.01
0.98
—
0.00
4.
HFET
113-13
742
9
25
21
4
228
9
0
1
1
8
0
0
14
185
0
0
2
—
0
4.
.7
.9
.0
.30
.81
.9
.94
.34
.85
.52
.03
.14
.22
.9
.
.02
.00
.89
.00
FTP
113-21
740.7
12.1
23.3
30.65
5.64
312.6
14.30
0.77
12.76
2.28
17.31
0.81
0.88
16.7
—
—
0.04
4.60
4.25
0.01
0.10
—
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
113-22
740.7
10.9
24.4
23.42
5.48
249.5
10.93
0.43
3.29
3.71
9.72
0.25
0.36
8.3
—
0.02
0.02
0.85
—
0.00
—
HFET
113-23
740
10
23
21
5
228
9
0
1
3
6
0
0
7
-
0
0
_
7
-•
0
—
.7
.7
.3
.25
.10
.6
.91
.35
.67
.79
.31
.26
.41
.3
—
.01
.01
_
.67
-
.00
FTP
113-31
741
10
22
30
5
312
14
0
12
2
15
0
0
14
-
0
0
2
3
0
0
—
.2
.9
.8
.61
.78
.4
.28
.80
.50
.22
.31
.36
.39
.1
-
.13
.00
.02
.97
.11
.12
SET
113-32
741.4
8.3
25.6
23.19
5.69
248.0
10.82
0.39
2.72
3.22
9.93
0.22
0.32
8.3
—
0.01
0.00
_ _ '
0.90
—
—
—
HFET
113-33
741.4
8.3
25.6
20.41
5.17
219.6
9.52
0.34
1.55
3.86
7.30
0.16
0.26
7.2
—
0.02
0.03
__
6.45
—
0.00
—
-------
TABLE C-3. CAR 113 - DISABLED EGR (CONT'D)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/0 CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
I
vo
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
113-11
8.75
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.31
10.0
1.4
76.
76.
7.
36.
7.
36.
46.
85.
369.
51.
__
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
113-12
7.72
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.19
9.1
2.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
113-13
11.34
2.94
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.28
14.9
4.4
39.
48.
3.
15.
8.
23.
21.
27.
185.
54.
0.01
0.00
0.01
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
113-21
11.36
3.19
1.14
0.00
0.77
0.27
16.7
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
113-22
7.05
0.85
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.11
8.3
1.9
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
113-23
4.87
1.41
0.33
0.00
0.42
0.26
7.3
2.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— -
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
113-31
10.75
1.22
0.88
0.00
1.22
0.06
14.1
1.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.07
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
113-32
4.76
2.04
1.09
0.00
0.34
0.08
8.3
2.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
113-33
5.80
0.15
0.84
0.00
0.27
0.15
7.2
2.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
"•~~
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
o Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb'
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-3. CAR 113 - DISABLED EGR (Cont'd)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
113-11 113-12 113-13
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
113-21 113-22 113-23
113-31 113-32 113-33
No
Data
for
this
test
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.15 0.06
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01
*Blank filter had high Pb
-------
TABLE C-4. CAR 114 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/0 CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, % 5.76
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., i/100 km
Regulated Emissions
n Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
,1 Carbon Monoxide, g/km
1-1 Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
FTP
114-11
742.4
9.7
22.2
31.94
SET
114-12
742.7
9.5
24.4
25.33
HFET
114-13
742.7
10.4
23.9
23.38
FTP
114-21
740.2
11.4
23.3
32.26
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
114-22
740.2
9.5
24.4
25.39
HFET
114-23
740.2
8.8
26.1
20.22
FTP
114-31
739.1
10.7
21.7
32.08
SET
114-32
739.6
10.0
25.0
25.71
HFET
114-33
739.6
10.0
23.3
22.80
36.33
0.89
0.93
0.03
3.
5.30
4.85
5.57
5.14
4.56
5.70
5.04
20.65
0.35
0.46
14.38
0.23
0.33
46.19
1.22
1.26
25.92
0.79
1.04
22.71
0.50
0.82
39.04
1.38
1.43
21.85
0.58
0.75
0.00
2.
0.00
4.
0.43
4.
0.07
3.
0.00
2.
0.18
0.00
3.
4.54
324.6
14.91
0.83
14.03
1.26
267.2
11.82
0.46
5.28
1.26
251.1
10.91
0.34
2.16
1.36
309.4
15.05
1.14
25.22
1.27
260.9
11.85
0.54
9.55
1.30
215.7
9.43
0.28
2.85
1.19
309.3
14.97
1.09
24.17
1.20
264.0
12.00
0.51
9.80
1.29
243.3
10.64
0.36
3.10
1.57
16.54
0.51
0.75
19.1
259.
0.11
0.04
27.6
146.
0.03
0.03
17.7
—
0.08
0.01
33.4
—
0.02
0.00
24.4
—
0.05
0.03
21.0
—
0.05
0.05
29.2
—
0.32
0.00
20.1
—
0.03
0.00
11.8
— —
0.03
0.01
0.00
2.
-------
TABLE C-4. CAR 114 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION (CONT'D)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
n
i
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylaniine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
114-11
13.73
3.95
0.81
0.00
0.37
0.27
19.1
2.3
31.
71.
7.
29.
13.
31.
32.
45.
259.
31.
0.05
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
114-12
20.50
5.43
1.08
0.00
0.47
0.15
27.6
6.0
14.
48.
4.
16.
3.
21.
18.
22.
146.
32.
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
114-13
12.66
4.06
0.59
0.00
0.31
0.10
17.7
5.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
114-21
23.86
7.35
1.35
0.00
0.61
0.20
33.4
2.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
114-22
17.91
5.01
0.92
0.00
0.54
0.04
24.4
4.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
114-23
14.73
5.31
0.63
o.oo
0.24
0.08
21.0
7.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
114-31
19.59
7.11
1.19
0.00
0.67
0.67
29.2
2.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
~* —
0.19
0.13
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
114-32
16.50
2.96
0.35
0.00
0.12
0.14
20.1
3.9
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-__
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
114-33
8.84
2.48
0.34
0.00
0.08
0.09
11.8
3.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
_ _
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-4. CAR 114 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION (Cont'd)
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET HFET
FTP
SET HFET
FTP
SET HFET
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
114-11 114-12 114-13
114-21 114-22 114-23
114-31 114-32 114-33
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb*
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe •
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
—
0.01 0.01 0.50
0.01
0.05 0.04 0.03 0.13
0.01 0.26
0.02 0.07
0.02 0.36
0.35 0.05 0.04 0.68
0.03 0.02 0.01 0.73
0.02 0.02
—
0.59
0.01
0.12
0.08
0.22
0.05
0.37
0.18
0.66
0.02
—
0.08
0.40
0.02
0.14
0.28
0.05
0.04
0.40
0.01
—
0.46
0.01
0.09
0.24
0.10
0.33
0.21
0.71
0.02
—
0.42
0.01
0.08
0.15
0.06
0.27
0.04
0.45
0.02
—
0.33
0.01
0.07
0.11
0.02
0.22
0.03
0.31
0.01
*Blank filter had high Pb
-------
TABLE C-5. CAR 121 - RICH BEST IDLE
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature ,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide ,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., i/100 km
Regulated Emissions
n Hydrocarbons (THC) , g/km
,L Carbon Monoxide ,
*" Oxides of Nitrogen ,
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS
g/km
g/km
%
FTP
121-11
741.93
11.6
24.4
28.66
2.50
392.
474.
317.8
13.95
0.30
5.06
0.84
9.59
0.19
0.22
SET
121-12
741.9
9.7
23.9
22.24
2.05
499.
576.
251.5
10.82
0.05
1.22
0.95
1.36
0.08
0.12
HFET
121-13
741.9
8.8
24.4
19.03
1.50
515.
584.
215.9
9.26
0.04
0.58
0.96
1.75
0.06
0.11
FTP
121-21
733.3
9.9
23.9
30.11
1.10
373.
487.
298.9
14.65
1.07
26.11
0.59
12.90
0.46
0.51
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
121-22
733.
11.
24.
23.
0.
497.
614.
253.
11.
0.
9.
0.
4.
0.
3
0
4
67
65
7
52
37
53
84
86
15
0.21
HFET
121-23
733.3
11.0
24.4
20.31
2.85
517.
623.
227.4
9.88
0.10
2.41
1.13
5.11
0.01
0.02
FTP
121-31
738.6
9.5
24.4
30.13
1.50
367.
478.
299.2
14.66
1.09
25.93
0.54
5.94
0.36
0.40
SET
121-32
738.9
9.3
25.0
23.81
1.20
493.
601.
258.5
11.59
0.30
7.62
0.90
0.33
0.12
0.17
HFET
121-33
738.9
9.3
25.0
19.95
1.10
516.
610.
224.7
9.71
0.09
1.55
1.07
0.37
0.09
0.15
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sul fides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sul fide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.7
146.9
0.11
0.00
2.54
0.37
—
0.00
0.00
40.24
1.0
42.1
0.08
0.00
1.85
0,12
—
0.00
0.00
36.71
—
29.9
0.14
0.00
1.95
0.05
—
0.00
0.00
16.51
2.6
554.2
2.12
0.15
15.75
3.01
0.00
0.13
0.00
56.76
0.2
242.
4
74.2
0.53
0.
25.
2.
— —
2.
0.
12
51
52
89
00
50.4
0.15
16.04
1.14
~~
1.35
0.00
35.82
1.3
498.7
0.19
0.09
20.09
2.57
™ ™
0.11
0.00
57.83
0.0
215.9
0.78
0.06
18.07
0.94
"
1.82
0.00
38.50
0.6
56.2
0.70
0.13
10.47
0.54
0.65
0.00
18.35
-------
TABLE C-5. CAR 121 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
M
(J\
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
121-11
0.53
0.16
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.7
0.2
43.43
26.16
10.35
7.38
0.55
12.16
16.60
30.39
146.9
49.0
0.04
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
121-12
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.0
2.0
21.09
3.70
4.64
0.00
0.06
1.14
5.76
5.74
42.1
84.3
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
121-13
1.85
0.57
—
0.00
0.80
0.55
__
—
17.74
2.93
4.61
0.00
0.04
1.24
3.36
0.00
29.9
74.8
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
121-21
1.38
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.04
2.6
0.2
125.29
137.66
23.81
12.64
1.86
46.57
92.88
113.46
554.2
51.8
1.97
0.01
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.04
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
121-22
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.2
0.1
57.10
48.50
12.03
0.0
0.88
20.60
53.92
49.41
242.4
65.5
_ _•
0.04
0.49
0.00
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
121-23
0.34
0.00
—
0.00
0.18
0.00
—
"
28.42
8.75
6.68
0.0
0.49
3.65
17.74
8.48
74.2
74.2
__-
—
—
—
0.02
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
121-31
1.23
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.04
1.3
0.1
121.52
124.52
24.40
12.30
2.30
50.29
79.26
84.10
498.7
45.7
0.14
0.01
0.14
0.04
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.00
SET
121-32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
52.92
41.88
11.14
0.00
0.59
18.49
48.65
42.29
216.0
72.0
— _
0.11
0.39
0.28
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
121-33
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.6
0.7
23.60
7.83
5.67
0.00
0.17
2.92
11.42
4.65
56.2
62.5
_ _
0.07
0.56
0.07
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
c^ Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-5. CAR 121 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
121-11 121-12 121-13
0.02 0.01
0.01 0.02 0.02
0.18 0.05
0.01 0.02 0.01
0.34
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
121-21 121-22 121-23
0.02 0.01
0.02 0.03 0.02
0.27 0.06
0.01 0.01
FTP
121-31
0.01
SET
HFET
121-32 121-33
0.03 0.01
0.04 0.02 0.01
0.68 0.15 0.08
0.01 0.01 0.01
-------
TABLE C-6. CAR 122 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
I
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp. ,
Catalyst Max. Temp. ,
Carbon Dioxide ,
Fuel Cons. ,
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sul fides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sul fide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
., °C
>. , °C
g/km
100 km
FTP
122-11
743.7
14.2
27.2
29.74
1.83
378.
474.
315.7
13.88
SET
122-12
744.5
11.3
26.7
22.93
1.73
490.
584.
249.2
10.70
HFET
122-13
742.9
10.6
26.7
20.64
1.43
557.
597.
225.3
9.63
FTP
122-21
739.1
9.8
22.2
31.14
2.49
486.
636.
324.
14.53
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
122-22
739.1
8.2
22.8
23.87
2.01
632.
756.
253.5
11.14
HFET
122-23
739.1
8.4
25.6
21.80
0.97
731.
773.
234.9
10.17
FTP
122-31
739.4
10.3
21.1
30.96
2.12
489.
627.
322.1
14.45
SET
122-32
739.6
9.1
23.9
24.47
1.74
634.
756.
259.7
11.42
HFET
122-33
739.6
9.7
25.6
22.22
0.93
712.
111.
239.6
10.37
0.28
5.46
0.70
0.06
0.85
0.96
0.02
0.18
1.12
1.78
6.84
0.93
0.28
4.23
1.03
0.09
2.00
1.18
1.78
6.84
0.88
0.27
4.42
1.10
0.08
1.93
1.42
0.54
0.61
1.2
0.69
0.00
1.98
0.59
2.32
0.12
0.17
1.1
0.61
0.00
2.21
0.24
0.00 0.00
42. 21.
1.47
0.07
0.11
0.7
0.01
0.00
4.95
0.09
0.00
4.61
0.14
0.15
4.2
0.05
0.01
8.49
2.81
0.14
0.00
19.
1.00
0.16
0.22
0.3
0.08
0.04
1.89
0.00
10.
0.87
0.15
0.23
0.7
0.03
0.03
2.44
0.00
7.
3.79
0.41
0.44
5.8
0.06
0.00
5.25
2.48
0.02
0.00
33.
0.36
0.12
0.16
1.4
<0.01
0.00
1.98
0.00
14.
0.52
0.09
0.14
0.3
0.06
0.00
0.63
0.00
12.
-------
n
i
H-1
oo
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
TABLE C-6. CAR 122 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (CONT'D)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
FTP
0.00
0.14
1.2
0.4
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
122-11 122-12 122-13
122-21 122-22 122-23
0.00
0.07
1.1
0.1
0.00
0.00
0.7
3.5
0.18
0.20
4.2
0.2
0.00
0.04
0.3
0.1
0.00
0.17
0.7
0.7
0.18
0.00
5.8
0.3
0.09
0.05
1.4
0.5
HFET
122-31 122-32 122-33
1.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.33
1.47
0.00
0.00
0.22
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.25
2.76
0.59
0.00
0.27
0.59
0.44
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.3
0.4
0.52
0.12
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oi
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0-04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
TABLE C-6. CAR 122 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
FTP
122-11
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
U3 Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.01
UNMODIFIED
SET
0.01
HFET
FTP
122-12 122-13
122-21
0.01
0.01
0.02 0.01
0.22
0.02 0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
0.02
HFET
122-22 122-23
0.02 0.02
0.03 0.07 0.04
0.10 0.08
0.02 0.01 0.01
FTP
SET
HFET
122-31 122-32 122-33
0.01
0.01
0.02 0.01
0.02 0.05 0.05
0.09 0.04
0.02 0.01 0.01
-------
TABLE C-7. CAR 123 - DISABLED EGR
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
i
to
O
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons.,
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
'., °c
'., °C
g/km
100 km
FTP
123-11
742.7
11.4
21.7
30.00
2.05
378.
469.
315.2
14.00
SET
123-12
743.2
8.8
22.8
23.37
1.86
486.
576.
253.2
10.90
HFET
123-13
743-2
9.9
23.3
20.94
1.14
555.
601.
227.3
9.77
FTP
123-21
740.2
10.7
21.7
28.11
2.37
371.
474.
296.4
13.12
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
123-22
740.9
9.0
23.9
21.82
1.70
501.
601.
235.6
10.18
HFET
123-23
740.9
8.4
23.9
19.71
1.07
563.
618.
213.8
9.20
FTP
123-31
741.7
10.9
21.1
28.54
2.28
389.
487.
301.0
13.32
SET
123-32
741.7
8.9
22.8
21.95
1.80
503.
606.
236.3
10.24
HFET
123-33
741.7
8.6
25.0
19.89
1.15
566.
623.
215.3
9.28
0.39
7.38
0.69
4.35
1.17
1.3
0.05
1.37
0.91
0.96
0.06
0.09
0.03
0.96
1.05
0.53
0.08
0.13
0.33
6.31
1.13
8.75
0.33
0.39
0.06
1.77
1.43
1.24
0.06
0.09
0.04
0.99
1.57
0.53
0.06
0.10
0.34
6.35
1.09
4.34
0.20
0.23
0.07
2.21
1.40
2.08
0.07
0.11
0.05
1.27
1.54
0.97
0.09
0.15
2.1
0.85
0.00
4.65
0.84
0.00
0.00
1.0
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.9
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.00
4.8
0.19
0.00
2.10
1.44
2.1
0.03
0.00
1.2
0.00
0.00
0.63 0.55
0.00 0.00 0.00
51. 68. 32.
2.6
0.03
0.00
2.99
2.32
0.00
0.00
56,
0.9
0.04
0.00
0.92
0.04
73.
1.1
0.01
0.00
0.61
0.12
-------
TABLE C-7. CAR 123 - DISABLED EGR (CONT'D)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
n Individual Hydrocarbons
^ Methane
M Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
0.00
0.18
2.1
0.5
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
123-11 123-12 123-13
123-21
123-22 123-23
123-31
0.00
0.17
1.0
2.0
0.00
0.16
0.9
3.0
0.22
0.08
4.8
1.5
0.09
0.04
2.1
3.5
0.14
0.08
1.2
3.0
0.15
0.13
2.6
0.8
0.09
0.04
0.9
1.3
HFET
123-32 123-33
1.60
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.81
1.25
0.39
0.00
1.34
0.45
0.17
0.00
0.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.63
0.51
0.14
0.00
0.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.19
1.1
2.2
0. 21
0.60
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 15
0. 02
0. 02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
<0. 01
0. 01
0. 01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 01
0. 03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-7. CAR 123 - DISABLED EGR (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
to Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
UNMODIFIED WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP SET HFET FTP SET HFET FTP SET HFET
PVM-ST 123-11 123-12 123-13 123-21 123-22 123-23 123-31 123-32 123-33
Cr
Pb*
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si 0.01 0.03
Cd
Al 0.01 0.01 0.01
S 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl 0.02 0.05
Pt
Zn 0.05
Cu
Ni 0.21
Fe 0.04 1.28 0.04 0.02 0.03
V
Ti
Ba 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Ca 0.02 0.04
* Blank filter had high Pb
-------
n
TABLE C-8.CAR 124 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature , °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp. , °C
Catalyst Max. Temp. , °c
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons , (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide , g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen , g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
FTP
124-11
741.2
11.4
21.7
28.05
1.90
388.
491.
299.1
13.09
0.26
4.24
0.76
3.61
1.91
2.27
2.6
—
0.22
0.01
SET
124-12
742.4
9.4
22.8
21.86
1.71
491.
606.
237.8
10.20
0.04
0.65
0.87
0.84
0.17
0.26
3.4
—
0.08
0.00
HFET
124-13
742
9
23
19
1
559
617
217
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-
0
0
.4
.0
.9
.94
.36
.
.
.5
.30
.02
.25
.95
.71
.21
.35
.0
-
.00
.00
FTP
124-21
736
11
22
30
1
385
474
315
14
0
10
0
7
1
1
1
-
0
0
.3
.9
.2
.58
.36
.
.
.9
.27
.55
.59
.60
.17
.63
.78
.1
-
.17
.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
124-22
737.1
9.2
22.2
23.48
1.01
499.
584.
247.9
10.96
0.20
5.21
0.76
3.06
0.15
0.21
0.1
—
0.53
0.00
HFET
124-23
737.1
8.9
24.4
20.80
0.71
558.
606.
224.3
9.70
0.08
1.77
0.93
7.48
0.14
0.22
0.3
—
0.64
0.00
FTP
124-31
739.9
10.9
22.8
29.16
1.33
384.
477.
299.6
13.61
0.59
11.02
0.54
11.73
4.04
4.62
0.4
215.
0.37
0.01
SET
124-32
739.9
10.7
25.0
22.45
1.17
507.
599.
236.2
10.48
0.21
5.50
0.70
4.65
0.23
0.34
0.5
5&.
0.65
0.00
HFET
124-33
739.4
10.0
25.0
21.63
0.63
572.
627.
231.0
10.09
0.11
3.30
0.84
1.66
0.14
0.22
0.2
_ _
0.02
0.00
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.15
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.40
29. — 15. 35. 44 . 16.
-------
TABLE C-8. CAR 124 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION (CONT'D)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
I
NJ
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Bisulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
124-11
1.24
0.79
0.18
0.00
0.25
0.11
2.6
1.0
__
—
—
__
__
__
—
0.08
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
124-12
0.87
0.61
1.59
0.00
0.22
0.13
3.4
9.3
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
_ _
—
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
124-13
0.49
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.09
1.0
5.0
__
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
124-21
0.33
0.40
0.04
0.00
0.21
0.13
1.1
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
—
—
0.09
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
124-22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.39
0.05
0.08
0. 01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
124-23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.28
0.3
0.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.46
0.08
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
124-31
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.06
0.09
0.06
0.4
0.1
52.
44.
10.
8.
0.
20.
40.
41.
215.
36.
0.25
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
124-32
0.00
0.36
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.06
0.5
0.2
10.
10.
3.
0.
7.
4.
16.
6.
56.
27.
0.49
0.05
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
124-33
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.2
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
n
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-8. CAR 124 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET HFET
FTP
SET HFET
FTP
SET HFET
124-11 124-12 124-13 124-21 124-22 124-23 124-31 124-32 124-33
0.01
0.01 0.01
0.02 0.05
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.19 0.22 0.13
0.04 0.04 0.02
0.16 0.18 0.09
0.14 0.17 0.08
0.11 0.13 0.07
0.05 0.05
0.44 0.50 0.28
0.01 0.01
0.29
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.23
0.01
0.02
0.22
0.60
0.01
0.48
0.01
0.14
0.01
0.17 0.10
0.19 0.1-5 0.11
0.16 0.12 0.07
0.06 0.02
0.27
-------
TABLE C-9. CAR 131 - RICH BEST IDLE
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
n
l
NJ
CTi
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., H/IQO km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen,
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS
g/km
g/km
%
FTP
131-11
738.9
13.9
24.4
35.94
5.50
495.
593.
406.1
17.49
0.18
1.93
0.50
2.29
1.03
0.96
SET
131-12
739.1
9.5
24.4
28.57
4.45
613.
691.
322.8
13.90
0.06
1.76
0.36
4.38
2.33
2.72
HFET
131-13
739.1
10.0
25.0
24.26
4.30
597.
648.
276.1
11.80
0.05
0.18
0.50
3.86
1.35
1.86
FTP
131-21
743.2
10.1
24.4
39.27
3.30
604.
726.
438.8
18.98
0.17
3.42
0.34
—
2.06
1.75
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sul fides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sul fide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
1.4
85.2
0.26
0.00
2.51
0.06
__
0.00
0.00
5.12
1.8
39.1
0.29
0.00
1.76
0.00
— ~"
0.00
0.00
2.99
2.1
34.8
0.18
0.00
0.89
0.10
__
0.00
0.00
2.27
5.9
—
0.22
0.06
4.24
0.33
^~
0.00
0.00
1.56
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
131-22
741.2
9.5
26.1
31.47
3.15
700.
752.
353.6
15.21
0.02
1.70
0.32
5.74
2.68
2.84
4.6
—
0.11
0.03
2.15
0.04
~~
0.18
0.00
1.45
HFET
131-23
741.
9.
26.
26.
3.
637.
713.
302.
12.
0.
0.
0.
3.
1.
2
2
—
0
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2
5
1
73
80
1
92
04
29
47
,89
64
.05
.6
.11
.07
01
23
00
00
70
FTP
131-31
739.4
10.4
25.6
39.53
3.25
600.
713.
441.6
19.10
0.18
3.46
0.35
—
2.02
1.70
2.6
—
—
0.05
1.98
0.21
0.00
0.00
2.58
SET
131-32
739.4
9.1
23.9
31.95
2.85
705.
761.
358.2
15.44
0.03
2.20
0.33
4.56
2.34
2.44
1 .0
—
—
0.05
1.70
0.10
1.42
0.00
1.92
HFET
131-33
739.6
8.8
24.4
27.15
3.65
632.
708.
306.8
13.12
0.04
0.34
0.51
— —
1.48
1.82
*~) 1
Z.I.
— —
—
0.02
11 Q
. 18
0.14
0.00
0.00
2.03
-------
TABLE C-9. CAR 131 - RICH BEST IDLE (cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG./KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
o Individual Hydrocarbons
(o Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
L31-11
1.09
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
1.4
0.8
46.15
12.67
8.86
1.04
0.70
3.72
4.44
7.66
85.2
47.4
O.Q4
0.04
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
131-12
0.52
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.24
0.00
1.8
3.0
32.45
2.58
3.72
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
39.1
65.2
0.00
0.07
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
131-13
0.89
0.53
0.29
0.00
0.30
0.05
2.1
4.2
25.20
4.60
4.36
0.00
0.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.8
69.6
0.00
0.04
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
131-21
1.39
2.07
0.53
0.00
0.79
1.10
5.9
3.5
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.04
0.18
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
131-22
0.29
0.81
2.62
0.00
0.50
0.34
4.6
23.0
23.85
1.94
1.69
0.00
—
—
1.72
5.12
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
131-23
0.48
0.48
0.27
0.00
0.87
0.47
2.6
6.5
20.68
3.27
2.78
0.00
—
—
0.49
2.64
—
— —
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
131-31
0.85
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.64
2.6
1.4
63.47
18.68
5.24
2.70
—
—
9.99
20.36
—
— —
__
—
—
— —
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
131-32
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.36
1.0
3.3
11.17
0.56
0.71
0.00
—
—
0.17
0.00
—
~~~
—
—
—
— —
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
131-33
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.80
2.1
5.3
25.48
3.98
3.16
0.00
—
—
0.67
2.36
—
~*~~
—
—
—
— —
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
co Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-9. CAR 131 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
131-11
0.01
0.20
0.08
SET
HFET
FTP
131-12 131-13
131-21
0.01
1.00 0.62
0.02
0.60
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.31
0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
131-22 131-23
No
Data
for
this
test
FTP
131-31
SET
HFET
131-32 131-33
0.01
1.12
0.01
0.74
1.00 0.58
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.01
-------
TABLE C-10. CAR 132 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
i
to
10
UNMODIFIED
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature ,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp
Catalyst Max. Temp
Carbon Dioxide,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
°r
. , (_
Op
. , c
g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/ '100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC)
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen
, g/km
g/km
, g/km
FTP
132-11
743.2
10.0
21.7
37.56
5.08
482.
584.
406.6
17.53
0.20
2.16
0.43
SET
132-12
742.7
8.4
22.2
28.26
4.66
572.
661.
308.2
13.19
0.05
0.37
0.35
HFET
132-13
742.7
9.0
25.6
24.25
4.23
615.
661.
264.7
11.32
0.04
0.22
0.38
FTP
132-21
743.7
10.6
21.7
38.47
5.21
587.
713.
412.8
17.95
1.28
2.36
0.70
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
132-22
743.7
9.1
22.2
29.50
4.58
698.
827.
321.3
13.77
0.15
0.51
0.50
HFET
132-23
743.7
7.5
24.4
25.24
4.28
736.
800.
275.3
11.78
0.08
0.22
0.56
FTP
132-31
745
10
22
37
5
582
708
407
17
0
2
0
.0
.8
.8
.88
.15
.
-
.4
.67
.96
.30
.71
SET
132-32
744.7
8.2
22.8
29.14
4.77
697.
809.
317.2
13.60
0.16
0.51
0.52
HFET
132-33
744.7
8.7
24.4
24.83
4.34
726.
796.
270.8
11.59
0.09
0.25
0.55
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
2.79
0.88
0.78
3.13
3.82
4.51
3.26
3.47
4.77
2.83
0.76
0.66
2.95
1.90
2.15
1.58
1.29
1.70
8.26
2.78
2.45
4.83
3.65
4.18
2.08
3.07
4.12
2.3
136.
0.11
0.03
1.1
20.
0.07
0.00
1.3
21.
0.12
0.00
6.2
—
0.21
0.02
0.1
—
0.14
0.02
1.8
—
0.24
0.00
7.5
—
0.54
0.00
2.7
—
0.14
0.00
6.4
—
0.00
0.00
3.71
0.10
0.11
0.00
5.
0.00 0.14
0.00 0.00
3. 3.
2.65
0.09
0.00
0.00
5.
0.05 0.00
0.00 0.00
3. 2.
2.28
0.16
0.00
0.00
6.
0.13 0.14
0.00 0.00
3. 3.
-------
TABLE C-10.CAR 132 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (CONT'D)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
n
Ul
o
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Fo rma1dehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
132-11
1.67
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
2.3
1.2
80.
20.
12.
0.
6.
6.
12.
136.
68.
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
132-12
0.57
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
1.1
2.2
17.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
20.
40.
0.06
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
132-13
0.60
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
1.3
3.3
17.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
21.
53.
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
132-21
3.95
1.77
0.22
0.00
0.08
0.13
6.2
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
132-22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.11
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
HFET
123-23
1.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.09
1.8
2.3
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
— —
0.03
0.08
0.12
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
132-31
4.99
1.70
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.07
7.5
0.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.24
0.29
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
132-32
2.05
0.31
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.07
2.7
1.7
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
132-33
4.07
1.82
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.10
6.4
7.1
_ _
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
0.00
o.oc
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-10. CAR 132 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
SET
HFET
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
132-11 132-12 132-13
FTP
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
i Sulfur
LO
t-- Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb*
Mn
As
Hg
Br
p
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
—
0.01 0.01
0.02 0.01 0.04
0.30 1.55 1.64 0.37
0.12
0.02
0.03
0.07
0.43
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.02
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
132-21 132-22 132-23
0.01
0.77 0.50
0.01
FTP
0.01
0.04
1.29
0.02
0.05
0.44
0.02
0.02
SET
HFET
132-31 132-32 132-33
0.01
1.49 1.29
0.10 0.03
0.01
* Blank filter had high Pb
-------
n
u>
K)
TABLE C-ll.CAR 133 - DISABLED EGR
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide ,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC)
Carbon Monoxide,
Oxides of Nitrogen,
, 9/krn
g/km
g/km
133-11
744.
8.
25.
37.
5.
—
601.
409.
17.
0.
1.
0.
5
9
6
77
41
7
62
19
66
40
SET
133-12
744.0
10.4
25.6
29.99
4.94
604.
699.
327.2
14.00
0.04
0.37
0.36
HFET
133-13
744.0
9.9
26.7
25.84
4.21
623.
704.
281.9
12.06
0.04
0.27
0.44
FTP
133-21
741.7
10.0
23.3
33.19
5.55
—
—
360.0
15.49
0.15
1.55
1.45
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
133-22
740.4
9.2
26.7
25.22
5.04
506.
610.
275.6
11.77
0.03
0.06
1.45
HFET
133-23
742.2
8.7
26.1
20.98
4.96
518.
584.
229.2
9.79
0.03
0.02
1.74
FTP
133-31
741.2
9.8
22.2
31.93
5.24
419.
512.
346.1
14.90
0.15
1.60
1.34
SET
133-32
742.2
7.7
23.9
24.69
5.35
512.
606.
269.7
11.52
0.03
0.06
1.31
HFET
133-33
742.2
9.4
26.1
21.20
5.08
542.
584.
231.6
9.89
0.03
0.03
1.81
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
3.35
0.41
0.36
4.45
1.72
1.91
.35
.59
.34
2.75 42.36 18.81
0.66 25.90 15.35
0.66 34.23 24.39
3.45 16.79
0.24
0.25
7.99
10.79
16.62
12.26
19.28
1.9
91.
0.10
0.00
9.34
0.21
—
0.00
4.
0.9
22.
0.01
0.00
1.72
0.11
—
0.00
3.
0.
33.
0.
0.
3.
0.
—
0.
2.
3
01
00
29
06
00
5.1
51.
0.27
0.11
3.58
0.23
—
0.00
9.
2.3
16.
0.03
0.00
0.09
—
0.00
5.
5.
18.
0.
0.
0.
—
0.
7.
9
00
00
06
00
5
71
-
0
0
0
0
0
11
.4
.7
-
.00
.39
.16
.00
.00
.
3.2
14.0
0.02
0.00
0.08
— —
0.00
3.
6.1
10.0
0.00
0.00
__
0.04
w- .
0.00
6.
-------
TABLE C-ll.CAR 133 - DISABLED EGR (CONT'D)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Fo rmaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
133-11
1.74
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.9
1.0
54.
10.
10.
1.
1.
3.
4.
8.
91.
48.
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
133-12
0.40
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.9
2.2
16.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
22.
55.
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
133-13
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.9
24.
2.
2.
0.
1.
0.
1.
3.
33.
83.
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
133-21
5.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.1
3.4
29.
5.
5.
0.
0.
2.
3.
7.
51.
34.
0.09
0.17
<0.01
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
133-22
2.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.3
7.7
9.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
4.
16.
53.
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
133-23
4.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.33
5.9
19.7
8.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
7.
18.
47.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
133-31
4.79
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.10
0.34
5.4
3.6
23.85
11.62
4.91
2.28
0.19
4.35
6.34
18.14
71.7
47.8
—
—
—
— —
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
133-32
2.11
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.17
0.93
3.2
10.8
5.53
0.19
0.83
0.00
0.18
0.00
1.05
6.22
14.0
46.7
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
133-33
4.49
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.07
1.37
6.1
20.2
4.15
0.48
0.74
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.65
3.84
10.0
33.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
TABLE C-ll. CAR 133 - DISABLED EGR (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
!£ Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0.01
0.01
0.14
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.05
SET
0.01
0.01
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
133-11 133-12 133-13
0.60
133-21 133-22 133-23
No
Data
for
this
test
0.50
0.01
0.72 1.09
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
SET
0.01
0.26
0.01
7.94
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.01
3.16
0.01
HFET
133-31 133-32 133-33
0.01
4.48
0.01
0.03
0.03
-------
TABLE C-12. CAR 135 - NO AIR INJ. + R.B.I.
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - CALIFORNIA
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, rag/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
o Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
iJj Carbon Monoxide, g/km
^ Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
FTP
135-11
744.7
10.4
22.2
36.48
5.03
485.
593.
393.8
17.02
0.17
2.88
0.37
5.24
0.60
0.55
0.3
0.49
0.00
5.85
0.02
0.00
5.
SET
135-12
745.5
8.3
23.9
28.30
4.68
601.
708.
308.5
13.21
0.04
0.49
0.33
6.67
3.12
3.67
0.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.
HFET
135-13
745.5
7.4
24.4
23.60
4.37
613.
674.
257.6
11.01
0.03
0.18
0.37
6.90
2.95
4.17
0.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.
FTP
135-21
742.4
10.9
22.8
38.43
0.89
417.
525.
332.9
17.93
1.23
53.08
0.28
12.56
0.32
0.28
15.5
0.21
0.10
9.21
1.65
0.23
0.13
6.
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
135-22
742.2
8.4
22.2
28.06
0.63
532.
668.
266.9
13.09
0.49
24.37
0.24
4.40
0.10
0.13
5.4
2.17
0.00
0.60
3.66
4.
HFET
135-23
742.2
7.6
22.8
23.82
0.31
608.
669.
244.9
11.12
0.17
9.56
0.23
1.96
0.16
0.22
3.5
0.43
0.00
0.06
0.25
3 .
FTP
135-31
743.2
9.3
21.7
38.09
0.88
423.
525.
329.5
17.77
1.25
52.78
0.27
18.06
1.14
1.00
7.5
0.25
0.00
15.78
1.49
0.08
0.10
7.
SET
135-32
743.7
8.8
24.4
28.42
0.59
538.
674.
273.3
13.26
0.46
22.90
0.26
9.38
0.05
0.06
6.1
1.94
0.00
0.78
4.86
2.
HFET
135-33
743.7
9.0
23.9
23.75
0.38
617.
678.
244.9
11.08
0.15
9.04
0.28
6.64
0.06
0.08
1.9
1.62
0.00
0.51
1.98
3.
-------
TABLE C-12. CAR 135 - NO AIR INJ. + R.B.I. (CONT'D)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - CALIFORNIA
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
I
00
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylandne
Triethylamine
FTP
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.2
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
135-11 135-12 135-13
135-21
135-22 135-23
0.00
0.00
0.2
0.5
0.00
0.00
0.6
2.0
5.09
0.63
15.5
1.3
1.45
0.41
5.4
1.1
0.36
0.63
3.5
2.1
3.00
0.06
7.5
0.6
2.11
0.07
6.1
1.3
HFET
135-31 135-32 135-33
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.91
4.64
3.25
0.00
0.47
1.96
1.10
0.00
0.38
1.46
0.62
0.00
1.18
2.27
1.02
0.00
0.56
2.54
0.83
0.00
0.54
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.9
1.3
0.41
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.16
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
< 0.01
< 0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.89
0.04
0.00
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.58
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
o
i Sulfur
00
-J Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-12. CAR 135 - NO AIR INJ. + R.B.I. (Cont'd)
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - CALIFORNIA
^ EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
135-11 135-12 135-13
135-21 135-22 135-23
135-31 135-32 135-33
0.03
0.20
0.01
1.25 1.28
0.02
0.02
0.02 0.01
0.01 0.03 0.02
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
-------
TABLE C-13. CAR 141 - RICH BEST IDLE
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature ,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
o Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
Jj Carbon Monoxide ,
00 Oxides of Nitrogen ,
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS
g/km
g/km
%
FTP
141-11
741.2
9.3
23.3
34.11
5.70
—
—
369.0
15.92
0.30
1.88
0.96
8.61
0.80
0.78
SET
141-2
740.9
9.2
25.0
26.19
4.55
—
—
285.3
12.22
0.11
0.46
0.88
2.73
0.92
1.17
HFET
141-13
740.9
10.2
26.1
24.36
3.20
—
—
265.0
11.37
0.11
0.62
0.89
4.59
2.01
2.75
FTP
141-21
740.2
10.2
24.4
36.17
4.95
554.
657.
362.6
16.88
0.63
19.60
0.60
2.97
0.22
0.20
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
141-22
739.6
8.8
24.4
27.19
3.90
589.
699.
290.6
12.69
0.15
3.94
0.67
2.68
0.12
0.15
HFET
141-23
739.6
10.0
23.3
24.05
3.15
547.
639.
259.7
11.22
0.16
1.79
0.85
1.73
0.15
0.21
FTP
141-31
739.9
11.2
23.9
37.44
4.45
557.
666.
376.3
17.47
0.61
19.79
0.64
2.97
0.33
0.29
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sul fides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sul fide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
2.0
104.5
0.15
0.01
1.67
0.01
~~
0.00
0.00
19.22
1.6
42.0
0.13
0.00
0.77
C.04
"
0.00
0.00
7.14
1.1
59.1
0.07
0.00
0.76
0.06
~~
0.00
0.00
4.82
2.4
285.7
0.02
0.02
11.44
0.82
0.25
0.00
9.93
0.8
99.0
0.00
0.05
14.67
0.01
0.59
0.00
5.11
1.0
52.7
0.01
0.02
5.57
0.09
0.00
0.00
2.96
2.5
314.6
0.04
0.13
31.35
1.13
0.26
0.00
9.58
SET
141-32
739.
10.
23.
27.
3.
564.
657.
289.
12.
0.
4.
0.
1.
0.
4
7
3
17
70
4
68
17
52
69
23
13
0.16
1.5
110.
7
0.08
0."
12.
0.
0.
0.
5.
03
30
10
13
00
82
HFET
141-33
733.6
11.3
25.6
22.76
3.15
552.
636.
246.3
10.62
0.13
1.33
0.82
1.19
0.25
0.37
1.9
66.1
0.08
0.00
3.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.75
-------
TABLE C-13. CAR 141 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
o Individual Hydrocarbons
w Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimsthylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
141-11
0.91
0.51
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.31
2.0
0.7
33.81
15.75
16.86
1.47
0.63
7.23
6.06
22.71
104.5
34.8
0.00
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
141-12
1.09
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.10
1.6
1.5
18.12
5.31
10.18
0.00
0.49
1.92
0.00
5.94
42.0
38.1
0.00
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
141-13
0.52
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.15
1.1
1.0
23,54
4.66
11.97
0.00
0.79
3.50
7.36
7.32
59.1
53.8
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
141-21
1.31
0.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
2.4
0.4
135.06
34.91
17.97
0.97
1.91
11.53
65.39
17.98
285.7
45.4
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
141-22
0.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.8
0.5
57.63
6.06
10.09
0.00
0.90
2.15
18.69
3.47
99.0
66.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
141-23
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
1.0
0.6
26.99
3.15
10.70
0.00
1.10
1.36
3.83
5.58
52.7
32.9
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
141-31
1.34
0.49
0.32
0.00
0.14
0.22
2.5
0.5
132.02
39.04
18.50
0.65
2.39
13.03
71.49
37.44
314.6
51.6
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
141-32
0.92
0.29
0.09
0.00
0.08
0.08
1.5
0.9
61.05
12.85
12.28
0.00
1.39
3.58
14.34
5.25
110.7
65.1
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
141-33
0.49
0.00
0.00
1.37
0.00
0.00
1.9
1.5
33.56
6.66
11.33
0.19
1.03
2.36
4.87
6.07
66.1
50.8
0.00
0.07
-------
TABLE C-13. CAR 141 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
n
i Sulfur
o Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
PVM-ST
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
UNMODIFIED
FTP SET HFET
141-11 141-12 141-13
0.41
0.01
0.15
0.05 0.01
0.02
0.28 0.36 0.87
0.02 0.01
0.03
0.03
1.38 0.11 0.05
0.06 0.02 0.02
0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP SET HFET FTP SET HFET
141-21 141-22 141-23 141-31 141-32 141-33
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.05
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.02 0.01
0.19 0.11 0.11 0.02
0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
0.01 0.04
-------
TABLE C-14. CAR 142 - TWELVE PERCENT MISFIRE
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
i
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity ,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp
Catalyst Max. Temp
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
• , °C
. , °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., VlOO km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC)
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen
, g/km
g/km
, g/km
FTP
142-11
743.5
10.9
22.8
32.02
4.90
371.
461.
347.4
14.94
0.25
1.20
1.25
SET
142-12
743.7
9.0
23.9
25.38
4.35
448.
533.
276.8
11.84
0.08
0.25
0.93
HFET
142-13
743.7
8.1
24.4
21.82
3.29
487.
538.
238.1
10.18
0.06
0.15
0.77
FTP
142-21
741.7
11.1
22.2
34.70
4.91
504.
610.
371.1
16.19
1.59
2.02
1.68
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
142-22
742.7
9.1
22.2
27.00
4.19
599.
691.
292.8
12.60
0.51
0.48
1.16
HFET
142-23
742.7
9.7
23.9
23.42
3.15
633.
695.
254.3
10.93
0.39
0.30
0.99
FTP
142-31
742
11
22
34
4
503
639
364
15
1
1
1
.4
.1
.2
.14
.94
-
.
.7
.93
.71
.98
.71
SET
142-32
742.7
9.1
22.2
26.88
4.18
593.
678.
291.4
12.54
0.52
0.54
1.21
HFET
142-33
742.7
8.6
23.3
23.41
3.06
631.
687.
254.4
10.92
.38
0.24
1.09
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
5.05 5.93 11.50 10.95 5.56 6.56
0.54 3.68 7.39 — 0.59 0.75
0.56 4.83 11.29 — 0.73 1.07
14.46 5.53 6.35
0.32 0.47 0.91
0.31 0.58 1.30
4.8
72.
0.12
0.00
1.26
0.31
0.00
2.3
—
0.00
0.00
o.oo
—
3.3
—
0.10
0.00
0.00
—
10.5
—
0.06
0.01
4.71
0.17
0.00
8.2
—
0.01
0.01
__
0.00
—
9.5
—
o.oi
0.01
„
0.07
—
8.4
—
0.01
0.01
2.68
0.15
0.00
6.4
—
0.04
0.02
—
0.06
—
8.4
__
<0.01
0.0
—
0.19
—
0.00
18.
0.00
7.
0.00
4.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-14. CAR 142 - TWELVE PERCENT MISFIRE (CONT'D)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
^
10
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monornethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylainine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
142-11
4.16
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.27
0.18
4.8
1.9
20.
12.
7.
0.
1.
6.
8.
18.
72.
29.
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
142-12
1.34
0.64
0.12
0.00
0.15
0.06
2.3
2.9
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
142-13
0.55
0.00
2.53
0.00
0.15
0.09
3.3
5.5
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
<0.01
0.09
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
142-21
4.85
3.34
1.63
0.00
0.53
0.16
10.5
0.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
__
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
142-22
4.12
2.84
0.76
0.00
0.32
0.13
8.2
1.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
HFET
142-23
5.80
2.70
0.56
0.00
0.29
0.18
9.5
2.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
FTP
142-31
3.90
3.07
0.71
0.05
0.44
0.19
8.4
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
~~
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
142-32
3.49
1.86
0.54
0.00
0.35
0.11
6.4
1.2
—
—
—
— —
. —
—
—
—
—
*••«
0.00
0.03
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
142-33
5.40
2.24
0.44
0.00
0.26
0.07
8.4
2.2
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
—
^~
0.00
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
w Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-14. CAR 142 - TWELVE PERCENT MISFIRE (Cont'd)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET HFET
FTP
SET HFET
FTP
SET HFET
0.14 1.38 3.23
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.01 0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.08 0.20 0.18
0.01 0.01
0.01
0.02
0.28 0.23 0.04
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.03
142-11 142-12 142-13 142-21 142-22 142-23 142-31 142-32 142-33
0.01
0.01
0.10 0.19 0.40
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.03
0.26 0.11 0.10
0.03
0.01
*Blank filter had high Pb
-------
TABLE C-15.CAR 143 - DISABLED EGR AND AIR PUMP
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
0 Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
^ Carbon Monoxide, g/km
**• Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
FTP
143-11
742.9
9.7
23.9
32.41
4.87
—
444.
351.4
15.12
0.26
1.38
1.41
7.34
0.34
0.35
3.0
95.
0. 07
0.09
2.87
0.36
0.00
0.00
20.
SET
143-12
739.1
10.7
25.0
25.42
4.41
457.
542.
276.9
11.86
0.09
0.47
1.04
10.10
4.86
6.37
1.8
57.7
0.09
0.00
0.03
—
0.00
15.
HFET
143-13
739.1
9.7
25.6
22.59
3.28
479.
546.
246.5
10.54
0.07
0.16
0.95
23.21
14.12
20.84
1.5
29.
0.09
0.00
0.11
—
0.00
4.
FTP
143-21
740.7
9.8
22.2
32.22
4.07
338.
414.
348.2
15.03
0.33
1.88
4.02
10.70
0.33
0.34
6.3
120.
<0.01
0.05
2.57
1.64
0.04
0.00
56.89
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
143-22
739.4
8.8
24.4
26.03
3.06
428.
521.
284.0
12.15
0.08
0.23
5.05
7.01
2.07
2.65
6.4
32.
0.07
0.00
0.11
—
0.00
23.58
HFET
143-23
739.4
9.5
26.1
23.05
1.62
474.
525.
251.6
10.76
0.06
0.15
4.91
9.21
4.96
7.17
8.2
27.
0.02
0.00
0.08
—
0.00
12.86
FTP
143-31
745.0
8.4
22.2
34.31
4.03
354.
440.
370.8
16.01
0.39
1.99
4.23
9.65
0.18
0.17
7.9
156.
0.03
0.00
4.97
1.26
0.05
0.00
64.09
SET
143-32
744.7
8.6
23.3
26.41
3.05
442.
529.
288.1
12.32
0.07
0.24
5.22
13.54
6.93
8.75
3.4
—
0. 23
0.01
„
0.01
— —
0.00
—
HFET
143-33
744.7
8.1
24.4
22.29
1.72
481.
537.
243.3
10.40
0.07
0.08
4.85
16.53
13.04
19.50
3.8
23.
0.03
0.00
__
0.15
_»
0.00
—
-------
TABLE C-15. CAR 143 - DISABLED EGR AND AIR PUMP (CONT'D)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
o Individual Hydrocarbons
*> Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
143-11
2.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.0
1.2
45.
4.
17.
0.
1.
2.
5.
21.
95.
37.
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
143-12
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.25
1.8
2.0
24.98
6.08
9.36
0.00
0.20
3.21
5.91
7.99
57.7
64.1
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
143-13
1.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.06
1.5
2.2
17.
2.
7.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
29.
41.
0.04
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
143-21
4.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.95
6.3
1.9
35.13
20.31
8.28
0.65
0.00
11.14
12.55
31.91
120.0
36.4
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
i Sulfur
o> Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb'
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-15. CAR 143 - DISABLED EGR AND AIR PUMP (Cont'd)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE WITH AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
143-11 143-12 143-13
143-21 143-22 143-23
0.01
0.01
0.07 1.67 5.38
0.02
0.76
0.01
1.91
0.03
0.05
0.03 0.02
0.01 0.02 0.03
0.02
0.01 0.03 0.02
SET
HFET
143-31 143-32 143-33
0.01 0.01
0.01
0.04 2.67 4.98
0.01
0.07 0.13 0.09
0.01 0.03 0.03
* Blank filter had high Pb
-------
TABLE C-16. CAR 145 - NO AIR INJ. + R.B.I.
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
FTP
145-11
738.1
12.2
23.3
31.96
5.49
392.
482.
346.3
14.91
0.25
1.46
1.27
9.20
2.90
3.02
3.9
117.
—
0.00
SET
145-12
738.1
8.9
22.8
24.69
4.78
483.
572.
269.3
11.52
0.07
0.27
0.92
0.66
5.67
7.65
3.1
—
0.06
0.00
HFET
145-13
738.1
8.9
22.8
21.34
3.38
520.
572.
233.
9.96
0.05
0.05
0.77
3.93
10.31
16.10
1.4
—
0.00
0.00
FTP
145-21
739.1
11.4
21.7
35.20
5.79
351.
459.
298.8
16.42
2.21
50-. 26
0.61
14.31
5.26
4.98
1.1
426.
0.51
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
145-22
739.4
11.6
22.8
25.02
4.28
437.
533.
246.4
11.68
0.80
15.68
0.70
4.36
0.32
0.43
0.1
—
0.86
0.00
HFET
145-23
739.4
9.3
23.3
22.41
2.21
504.
546.
239.8
10.46
0.22
2.85
0.88
1.65
0.20
0.30
0.1
—
1.04
0.00
FTP
145-31
735.1
10.3
22.8
35.10
5.30
358.
461.
296.4
16.38
2.30
50.98
0.61
21.50
3.90
3.70
0.7
—
1.06
0.00
SET
145-32
738.6
10.7
23.3
25.97
4.01
463.
558.
255.0
12.12
0.84
16.67
0.69
3.46
0.42
0.54
0.0
—
1.22
0.00
HFET
145-33
738.6
8.8
24.4
21.74
2.24
513.
558.
232.3
10.14
0.23
2.90
0.77
1.66
0.30
0.46
0.1
—
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.
—
0.05
8.
— —
0.02
4.
— —
0.63
20.
— —
2.46
6.
~~
1.54
4.
0.75
7.
3.77
5.
1.30
3.
-------
TABLE C-16. CAR 145 - NO AIR INJ. + R.B.I. (CONT'D)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
n
i
00
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
145-11
3.49
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.18
0.11
3.9
1.6
48.
17.
14.
0.
—
6.
11.
21.
117.
47.
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
145-12
1.39
0.05
1.58
0.00
0.04
0.06
3.1
4.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
145-13
0.99
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.09
1.4
2.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
145-21
0.35
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
1.1
0.0
114.
99.
43.
4.
5.
26.
48.
87.
426.
19.
0.48
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
145-22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.1
0.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0. 73
0.04
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
145-23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.1
0.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.85
0.06
0.12
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
145-31
0.30
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.7
0.0
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
0.85
0.07
0.13
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
145-32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
™~ "~
1.04
0.08
0.09
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
145-33
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.1
0.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
_ _
0.20
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
O
^ Sulfur
<-0 Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-16. CAR 145 - NO AIR INJ. + R.B.I. (Cont'd)
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
0.01
0.13
0.03
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
145-11 145-12 145-13
145-21 145-22 145-23
0.01
145-31
NO
Data
for
this
test
145-32 145-33
0.15 1.89 4.06
0.01
0.02
0.01 0.02 0.04
0.03 0.03
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
-------
TABLE C-17. CAR 151 - RICH BEST IDLE
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
I
Ln
O
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature , °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp. , °C
Catalyst Max. Temp. , °C
Carbon Dioxide , g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
FTP SET
151-11 151-12
740.7
8.8
24.4
27.44
2.95
542.
652.
298.0
12.81
HFET
151-13
740.7
9.1
23.9
25.02
1.85
—
652.
272.7
11.68
FTP
151-21
740.7
9.9
25.0
37.56
3.70
432.
588.
326.8
17.52
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
151-22
740.2
10.7
23.3
28.08
2.55
531.
661.
279.7
13.10
HFET
151-23
740.2
9.9
26.7
24.93
1.50
572.
669.
266.6
11.63
FTP
151-31
737.9
10.5
23.9
36.24
3.70
438.
584.
318.0
16.91
SET
151-32
736.9
9.6
24.4
28.11
2.60
540.
669.
280.1
13.12
HFET
151-33
737.9
9.5
26.1
24.96
1.45
579.
669.
267.1
11.65
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), 9/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.12
1.04
1.00
0.10
0.35
1.01
2.29
48.73
0.76
0.81
15.68
0.86
0.32
3.15
0.94
2.19
45.33
0.74
0.80
15.76
0.77
0.29
3.09
0.90
3.13
0.41
0.50
0.8
60.3
0.08
0.01
3.14
0.03
0.02
0.00
19.59
2.32
0.91
1.21
51.4
0.39
0.02
2.38
0.08
0.41
0.00
22.03
13.45
0.20
0.18
4.3
1023.5
0.26
0.11
53.86
6.98
0.55
0.00
45.55
2.98
0.14
0.17
0.8
366.3
—
0.04
22.15
2.04
2.00
0.00
20.79
2.27
0.12
0.16
2.2
144.4
—
— •
5.28
0.09
0.70
0.00
7.35
5.30
0.32
0.29
4.7
951.6
—
O.ii
59.42
5.31
0.59
0.00
44.5
2.48
0.15
0.18
0.9
401.6
0.02
0.07
35.85
1.93
2.73
0.00
23.2
1.95
0.29
0.39
1.3
166.8
—
o.oo
11.98
0.38
0.92
0.00
7.30
-------
TABLE C-17. CAR 151 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE VJ/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
i
ui
H1
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
151-11
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
SET
151-12
0.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.8
0.7
26.67
4.55
10.79
0.00
1.63
2.79
6.59
7.29
60.3
50.3
0.00
0. 04
0. 04
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
151-13
0.44
0.00
19.21
0.00
0.35
0.46
20.5
20.5
27.67
2.44
10.67
0.00
2.01
1.37
2.21
5.03
51.4
51.4
0. 07
0.00
0. 28
0. 04
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
151-21
2.44
1.23
0.39
0.00
0.03
0.24
4.3
0.2
265.73
317.72
49.26
0.86
3.99
86.01
123.84
176.13
1023.5
44.7
0. 14
0. 01
0. 04
0-07
0.04
0.07
0. 00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
151-22
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.20
0.8
0.1
96.51
96.65
19.78
0.0
3.90
28.25
52.64
68.54
366.3
45.2
0. 02
0. 16
0.18
0.01
0.03
0. 00
0.00
0.00
HFET
151-23
0.60
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.18
2.2
0.7
46.16
24.82
12.09
0.0
1.26
10.29
22.95
26.69
144.4
45.1
0. 11
0. 39
0.00
0.01
o.oo
0.00
0.00
FTP
151-31
2.01
2.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
4.7
0.2
249.24
286.03
46.86
1.68
10.86
71.63
112.89
172.41
951.6
43.5
0. 04
0. 35
0.00
0.02
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
151-32
0.45
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.9
0.1
101.14
107.13
20.33
0.0
3.26
41.56
60.55
67.58
401.6
50.2
0.00
<0. 01
0. 01
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
151-33
0.72
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
1.3
0.4
52.63
29.65
11.59
0.00
5.28
11.45
28.79
27.92
167.3
57.7
0. 18
0. 27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
TABLE C-17. CAR 151 - RICH BEST IDLE (Cont'd)
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/O AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
M Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.11
0.01
0.05
0.02
.73
0.03
SET
0.01
0.01
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
151-11 151-12 151-13
151-21 151-22 151-23
151-31 151-32 151-33
0.01 0.01
0.11 0.33
0.03 0.03 0.02
0.01 0.02 0.03
0.11 0.03
0.02
0.21 0.09 0.04
0.01 0.02
0.09 0.05 0.03
0.01 0.02
-------
TABLE C-18. CAR 152 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE
1978 FOPD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons. ,
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons , (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
'., °C
>. , °c
g/km
100 km
FTP
152-11
741.4
8.8
24.4
32.30
3.80
470.
601.
348.2
15.07
SET
152-12
741.4
8.8
26.1
25.86
3.09
569.
661.
281.5
12.07
HFET
152-13
741.4
11.1
27.2
24.19
1.21
623.
696.
263.7
11.29
FTP
152-21
743.5
9.3
21.7
35.64
3.07
525.
734.
378.3
16.63
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
152-22
740.7
14.2
25.6
27.22
2.81
693.
782.
292.5
12.70
HFET
152-23
740.7
18.4
27.8
24.86
1.58
738.
787.
270.2
11.60
FTP
152-31
739.9
10.0
23.3
36.08
3.62
600.
726.
383.3
16.83
SET
152-32
739.9
10.9
22.8
26.72
2.91
681.
769.
288.1
12.47
HFET
152-33
739.9
7.5
24.4
24.34
1.69
731.
787.
264.6
11.36
0.29
2.56
1.02
0.10
0.58
0.95
0.07
0.37
0.93
1.59
4.03
1.28
0.53
2.16
1.39
0.29
0.44
1.73
1.62
3.81
1.23
0.47
1.62
1.23
0.28
0.38
1.05
3.32
0.51
0.53
3.2
122.4
0.26
0.01
3.52
0.66
0.02
1.62
0.37
0.48
0.6
55.
0.54
0.02
— —
0.04
—
1.39
0.09
0.12
0.9
28.
0.19
0.21
— —
0.09
—
5.59
0.11
0.10
4.8
151.
0.24
0.02
10.19
0.74
0.00
2.81
0.03
0.04
1.8
83.
0.30
0.02
_ —
0.25
—
1.24
0.03
0.04
5.3
65.
0.18
0.01
~"~
0.37
—
8.71
0.17
0.16
4.1
146.
0.18
0.00
8.89
0.93
0.08
2.85
0.07
0.09
2.2
—
—
0.00
0.25
—
1.50
0.05
0.07
6.4
—
0.07
0.00
0.24
— —
0.25
27.
0.00
21.
0.00
10.
0.00
9.
0.00
5.
0.00
3.
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-18. CAR 152 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (CONT'D)
1978 FORD MUSTANG 11-49 STATE W/O AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
n
Ul
ib.
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldenyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trime thy1amine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
152.11
2.49
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.25
3.2
1.1
36.61
19.49
11.96
0.64
1.42
11.28
13.64
27.35
122.4
42.2
0.05
0. 19
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
152-12
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.6
0.0
23.
3.
6.
0.
2.
0.
4.
17.
55.
55.
0. 20
0. 26
0. 08
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
152.13
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.53
0.9
1.3
16.
1.
3.
0.
0.
0.
2.
6.
28.
31.
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
152-21
2.41
1.77
0.43
0.00
0.18
0.00
4.8
0.3
60.
9.
8.
0.
15.
4.
30.
25.
151.
10.
0. 23
0. 01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
152-22
1.32
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.35
1.8
0.3
26.
4.
3.
0.
15.
3.
15.
17.
83.
16.
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
-^0.00
HFET
152-23
4.46
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
5.3
1.8
21.
9.
3.
0.
3.
8.
9.
12.
65.
22.
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
152-31
2.89
1.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
4.1
0.3
18.
9.
3.
0.
17.
4.
44.
51.
146.
9.
0.17
0. 01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
152-32
1.33
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
2.2
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
152-33
4.63
1.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
6.4
2.3
__
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
? Sulfur
Ul , .
en Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-18. CAR 152 - 12 PERCENT IGNITION MISFIRE (Cont'd)
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
152-11
152-12 152-13
152-21 152-22 152-23
0.01
0.12
0.06
0.03 0.02
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.02 0.01
FTP
0.02
0.13
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.05
1.70
SET
HFET
152-31 152-32 152-33
0.01
0.02
0.03 0.04
0.05 0.01
0.03
*Blank filter had high Pb
-------
o
\
Ln
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons.,
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), 9/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
TABLE C-19. CAR 153 - DISABLED EGR
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/O AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
°r
• i >-
°r
• i ^
g/km
100 km
FTP
153-11
740.7
10.7
21.7
25.37
3.42
431.
542.
342.7
14.93
SET
153-12
740.9
8.9
22.8
20.40
2.81
517.
618.
280.0
12.00
HFET
153-13
740.9
8.9
22.8
17.88
1.46
583.
644.
245.7
10.52
FTP
153-21
743.2
11.6
22.8
32.98
3.55
418.
525.
355.7
15.39
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
153-22
743.2
9.3
23.3
26.89
2.90
498.
614.
293.3
12.55
HFET
153-23
743.2
8.1
24.4
23.49
1.34
569.
631.
256.4
10.96
FTP
153-31
742.4
12.1
23.3
31.89
3.76
412.
521.
343.5
14.88
SET
153-32
741.4
9.1
22.2
25.82
2.85
494.
610.
281.5
12.05
HFET
153-33
741.4
9.2
25.0
23.02
1.23
563.
636.
251.1
10.74
0.37
3.74
1.10
5.68
0.65
0.85
0.09
0.61
0.93
4.89
0.59
0.96
0.06
0.42
0.85
2.78
0.18
0.34
0.31
2.53
4.12
9.35
0.25
0.25
0.07
0.29
4.74
5.49
1.51
1.87
0.05
0.16
4.52
5.27
2.53
3.59
0.34
2.60
4.18
8.07
0.20
0.21
0.08
0.32
4.51
6.04
0.99
1.28
0.05
0.24
4.20
4.23
0.83
1.20
3.8
148.
0.02
0.02
2.60
0.29
0.00
0.9
37.
0.00
0.00
.0.04
—
2.3
27.
0.03
0.00
0.02
—
4.9
157.
0.05
0.04
2.27
0.49
—
5.4
37.
0.05
0.02
__
0.00
—
5.0
27.
0.01
0.00
— —
0.00
—
7.5
—
0.01
0.06
2.60
0.62
— —
7.2
—
0.02
0.00
— '
0.00
— —
1.9
—
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
~~ ""
0.05
0.17
0.92
0.00
45.
0.00
24.
0.08
27.
0.00
0.05
0.00
24.
-------
TABLE C-19.CAR 153 - DISABLED EGR (CONT'D)
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
o
i
ui
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethvlamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
153-11
1.83
1.13
0.39
0.00
0.25
0.20
3.8
1.0
53.
28.
5.
0.
3.
13.
15.
31.
148.
40.
0.00
0. 02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
153-12
0.61
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.09
0.11
0.9
1.0
25.
2.
5.
0.
1.
0.
2.
2.
37.
62.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
, 0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
153-13
0.68
1.27
0.25
0.00
0.06
0.07
2.3
3.8
20.
0.
3.
0.
2.
0.
1.
1.
27.
45.
0. 01
0. 02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
153-21
3.31
0.18
0.07
0.00
0.21
1.13
4.9
1.6
74.
17.
23.
0.
5.
7.
15.
16.
157.
51.
0. 01
0. 04
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
153-22
3.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
2.12
5.4
7.7
24.
1.
7.
0.
1.
0.
2.
2.
37.
53.
<0. 01
0. 04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
HFET
153-23
3.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
1.46
5.0
10.0
20.
1.
5.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
27.
54.
0.00
<0. 01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
153-31
4.17
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.79
2.23
7.5
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
<0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
153-32
5.05
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.25
1.87
7.2
9.0
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0.00
<0. 01
<0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
153-33
1.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
1.9
3.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
o.oo
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Cr
*
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
i Sulfur
co Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-19. CAR 153 - DISABLED EGR (Cont'd)
1978 FORD MUSTANG 11-49 STATE W/O AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
153-11 153-12 153-13
153-21 153-22 153-23
153-31 153-32 153-33
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02 0.16 0.31
0.01
0.02 0.60 1.08
0.02 0.43 0.32
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.02 0.02 0.01
0.07
0.02 0.01
0.14
0.10 0.07
0.01 0.02
* Blank filter had high Pb
-------
o
I
ui
TABLE C-20. CAR 154 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp
Catalyst Max. Temp
Carbon Dioxide,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
. , °c
. , °C
g/km
Fuel Cons., A/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons , (THC)
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen
, g/km
g/km
, g/km
FTP
154-11
740.9
10.9
21.1
31.69
5.40
—
597.
339.7
14.79
0.31
3.73
0.94
SET
154-12
740.9
8.6
23.3
25.99
4.03
563.
652.
282.8
12.13
0.10
0.63
0.93
HFET
154-13
740
8
23
23
2
620
661
259
11
0
0
0
.7
.6
.3
.80
.17
f
f
.6
.11
.06
.30
.94
FTP
154-21
740.7
10.9
22.8
33.13
3.50
472.
612.
350.3
15.46
0.54
6.47
0.84
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
154-22
741.2
10.0
23.3
26.43
2.45
558.
674.
284.3
12.33
0.19
2.53
0.84
HFET
154-23
741.2
9.9
25.0
23.37
0.95
619.0
695.
253.4
10.91
0.09
1.17
0.62
FTP
154-31
742.4
10.6
23.3
32.94
3.66
474.
588.
351.1
15.37
0.42
4.94
0.90
SET
154-32
742.4
10.6
23.3
26.52
2.84
561.
652.
285.7
12.38
0.18
2.37
1.00
HFET
154-33
742.4
10.4
27.2
23.40
1.25
618.
666.
254.1
10.92
0.09
0.87
0.87
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
8.28
0.61
0.64
3.10
0.62
0.80
2.81
1.44
2.02
12.81
13.15
13.23
5.28
0.23
0.29
1.98
0.18
0.26
8.99
5.62
5.69
8.10
0.29
0.36
4.65
0.28
0.40
1.1
0.53
0.00
0.7
0.16
0.03
0.6
0.00
0.02
2.0
0.68
0.00
0.7
0.31
0.00
0.5
0.09
0.01
1.7
0.47
0.01
0.9
0.20
0.00
0.04
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.21
0.11
0.00
0.11
1.6
0.09
0.01
0.12
-------
o
I
en
o
TABLE C-20. CAR 154 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION (CONT'D)
1978 FORD MUSTANG 11-49 STATE
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides^
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethy1amine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
154-11 154-12
HFET
154-13
FTP
SET
154-21 154-22
HFET
154-23
FTP
SET
154-31
HFET
154-32 154-33
0.41
0.39
0.05
0.10
0.09
0.10
1.1
0.4
0.00
0.39
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.7
0.7
0.00
0.36
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.6
1.0
0.45
1.38
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.00
2.0
0.4
0.00
0.42
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.7
0.4
0.02
0.17
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.5
0.6
0.73
0.41
0.12
0.00
0.18
0.22
1.7
0.4
0.55
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.09
0.11
0.9
0.5
0.05
0.67
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.65
1.6
1.8
0.42
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
i Sulfur
(-• Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE C-20. CAR 154 - HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION (Cont'd)
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
FTP
0.05
0.01
SET
HFET
154-11 154-12 154-13
0.01
0.05 0.22 0.60
0.04
0.26 0.05 0.01
0.01 0.01
FTP
0.64
0.04
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
154-21 154-22 154-23
154-31 154-32 154-33
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
37
01
06
24
02
16
32
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
26
01
06
17
01
15
20
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
18
03
13
11
11
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
33
02
01
10
19
04
30
24
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
28
08
17
01
12
23
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
20
05
14
05
15
0.11 0.05
0.47
0.01
0.35
0.33 0.07 0.05
0.55
0.09
0.54
0.01
0.39
0.01
*Blank filter had high Pb
-------
APPENDIX D
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
TABLES D-l through D-4
TABLES D-5 through D-8
TABLES D-9 through D-l2
TABLES D-13 through D-16
TABLES D-17 through D-20
Car
11
12
13
14
15
Description
1977 AMC Pacer
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Chev. Malibu (Calif.)
1978 Ford Granada
1978 Ford Mustang II
-------
TARLi: D-l . FTP INDIVIDUAL SAM! I.f, I'MlMi 1'IMS I'J S''),T.:
Test Surics No. Ill - Ki'.-h H< *;t Ml"
Total Pas ticulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acctaldehyde
Acetone
IsobutyraIdehyde
Metiiyl ethyl ketone
CrotonaIdehyde
Mexanaldehydc
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Uiethylamine
Triethylamine
Ijnd i vidjia 1 Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
r-opane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
UiirKxiif led
111-11
COLD-HDD!:
45
0
2
0
15
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
,,,
.r-o
.69
. 18
.05
.87
.43
0
.13
.20
. 25
. 14
. 11
. 11
.04
0
0
0
0
COLD-UDDS
1
8.87
15.74
1.29
7.50
0.16
7.35
8.22
7.69
0.07
0
2
1.77
5.84
0.47
2.15
0.03
2.67
2.78
3.80
0.03
0
HOT-UDDS
29.04
0.25
1.07
0
6.89
2.60
1.17
0
0.29
0.06
0. 11
0
0. 07
0. 04
0.03
0.05
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3
2.68 0
10.29 4
0.60 0
3.77 1
0.03 0
4.54 2
4.93 1
7.63 2
0.11 0
0
4
.72
.60
.31
.60
.01
.13
.92
.38
.06
0
1 1 1 - ,' 1
IT)I.I>-1J|I(>S
15.-'?
0.50
?.. (.4
1 . 39
0.48
25.53
5.22
0 . 36
0.24
0.02
O.f>7
'•' .07
0.07
0.14
0
0
0
0
o
Emissions in
COLD-UDDS
1 2
26.03 3.67
21.44 6.07
1.53 C.29
19.89 2.08
0.23 0.15
8.44 2.39
9.87 2.95
9.0fl 3.27
0.05 0.04
0 0
H,ll tutr-1 i
HOT-llUIlS
20 47
0.21
?.f>5
0 56
0
8.64
1. 37
0
0
0.35
0.02
0
' 0.01
0.06
0
o
0
0
0
0
ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
5.92 2.83
11.86 5.55
0.61 0.24
4.36 1.84
".18 0.09
4.80 2.32
5.76 2.65
9.53 3.38
0.04 0.03
0 0
.on
111- Jl
COLO-Ut'DS
32.28
0. 30
1.51
2.48
0.52
8. 29
2.06
0
0
0.21
0.11
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.02
0.11
0.05
0
0
COLD-UDDS
1 2
22.06 4.22
20.07 6.32
1.58 0.43
17.31 2.22
0.19 0
7.95 2.29
10.69 5.91
14.24 2.91
0.10 0.06
0 0
IR.i -UI'DS
20 . 26
0.13
1 .18
2.55
0
10.13
0.96
0
0
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.04
0
0
0.10
0.06
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3
12.14 2
13.82 5
0.97 0
10.48 1
0.33 0
5.59 2
11.95 2
14.85 2
0.12 0
O
4
.20
.19
.34
.83
.03
.04
.34
.19
.07
0
-------
TABLE D-2. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 112 - Twelve Percent Ignition Misfire
Emissions in mg/km
7
u>
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trinethylarnine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
112-11
COLD-UDDS
29.21
0.17
0.88
1.43
0
8.47
1.63
0.25
0
0.20
0
0.21
0.18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
27.75
0.14
1.12
2.39
0
4.06
0.82
0
0
0.11
0.13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
112-21
COLD-UDDS
56.37
1.43
0.90
0.66
74.59
30.47
9.62
0
5.80
2.13
0.65
0
0.01
0.04
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
41.78
0.92
0.76
0.39
28.11
15.47
5.07
0
3.34
0.79
0.10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
112-31
COLD-UDDS
54.98
1.25
0.66
0.65
107.38
41.05
14.23
0
7.04
2.67
0.77
0
0
0
0.11
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
43.44
0.94
0.58
0.21
98.61
39.48
12.00
0
5.57
2.31
0.22
0
0
0
0.19
0.07
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-3. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 113 - Disabled EGR
Emissions in mg/km
o
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Airanonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine &
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
dimethylamine
Unmodified
113-11
COLD-UDDS
28.62
0.31
3.23
3.40
0.13
10.11
0.62
0
0
0.17
0.22
—
—
—
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
21.55
2.11
5.57
3.24
0
7.72
0.73
0
0
0.30
0.37
0.11
0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
113-21
COLD-UDDS
22.18
0.71
4.61
5.40
0.23
14.80
3.14
0.80
0
0.42
0.20
—
—
—
0.01
0.02
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
13.64
0.88
4.60
3.39
0
8.77
3.22
1.40
0
1.03
0.32
0.17
0.20
0.09
0
0.04
0.01
0
0
0
113-31
COLD-UDDS
12.18
0.51
1.89
4.08
0.28
13.26
2.51
1.00
0
2.72
0.14
0.17
0.08
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
17.67
0.24
2.12
3.88
0
8.86
0.25
0.79
0
0.08
0
0
0.03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-4. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 114 - High Oil Consumption
Emissions in mg/km
Unmodified
114-11
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
Malfunction
114-21
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
114-31
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
V
(Jl
Total Particulate 39.45
Sulfates 1.20
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide 0.08
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide 0.11
Methyl sulfide 0.07
Ethyl sulfide 0
Methyl disulfide 0
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine 0
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine 0.05
Trimethylamine 0
Diethylamine 0
Triethylamine 0
33.98
0.66
0
0.06
0
0
0
0.03
0
0
0
55.69
1.76
0.88
39.03
0.81
0.09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43.77
1.94
0.43
35.48
0.95
19.13
5.31
1.12
0
0.45
0.29
9.66
2.92
0.58
0
0.31
0.26
27.05
6.46
0.43
0
0.43
0.21
21.45
8.03
2.05
0
0.75
0.20
22.17
10.05
1.69
0
0.70
0.49
17.64
4.90
0.82
0
0.65
0.80
0
0
0
0
0.01
0.01
0
0
0.25
0.11
0.01
0
0.15
0.14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLL [i-S. KTP INDIVIDUAL S; MH.K
Tvst Scrips ;4o. 121 - Kirh
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dime thy l-'iminc
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbon^
Me thane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Fropylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
I.m i ss ions
Unmodified
11
14
1
4
0
6
7
15
1
121-11
COLD-UDDS
16.38
0.23
2.98
0.66
0
1.24
0.37
0.05
0
0
0
0.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.17 1.81
.28 0.10
.96 0.67
.83 0
.22 0
.65 0
.95 0.74
.38 1.95
.77 O.54
0 0
IIOT-UDLlS
4.47
0.16
2.20
0.15
0
0
0
I)
0
0
0
0
0
0.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT UDDS
3 4
3.2B 1.47
1.28 0.05
1.15 0.59
0 0
0.08 0
0.68 0
1.32 0
0 . 96 0
3.42 0.26
0 0
121-
fOLD-lTOK
18.59
0.58
11.93
3. IS
n. n
2.?4
l.RH
0
0
0.40
0. 10
0. 11
0
0. 07
0
0
0.10
0.09
0
0
Emissions
UlLD-UDDS
1 2
22.12 9.50
30.22 11.42
3.55 2.03
8.55 0
0.30 0
12.09 4.61
15.58 9.53
13.69 13.03
0.78 1.38
0 0
in rrt'i, km
Mai function
21
IIOT-UDPS
8.61
U.37
1H.63
2.90
0.13
0.73
0
0
0
0.40
n
3.37
0.01
0. 18
0
0
O.ll
0
0
0
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
8 . 36 7 . 88
11.35 9.69
2.29 1.74
0 0
0.29 0.24
4.98 4.13
8.91 8.49
10.43 11.33
3.91 1.27
0 0
121-31
COLD-HDDS
12.47
0.52
17.92
3.29
0.19
2.56
0
0
0
0
0.10
0.25
0.00
0. 18
0.07
0
0.03
0
0
0
COI.D-UDDS
1 2
19.71 9.66
23.91 11.32
2.97 2.17
8.29 0
0.30 0.19
9.36 4.42
8.25 9.66
0 12.40
1.36 1.36
0 0
HOT-UDDS
1.02
0.23
?1 .71
2.02
0.04
0.23
0
0
0.10
0
0
0 . 04
0.11
0.11
0.04
0
0.12
0.02
0
0
Hox-unos
3
8.66 7
11.40 R
2.72 1
0
0.24 0
4.63 3
8.12 7
9.96 9
3.62 1
0
4
.46
.66
.73
0
.19
.72
.80
.56
.25
0
-------
TABLE D-6 . FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 122 - Twelve Percent Ignition Misfire
Emissions in rag/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylainine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
122-11
COLD-UDDS
__
0.96
1.50
0.99
0
2.42
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
1.70
0.23
2.34
0.28
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
122-21
COLD-UDDS
7.13
0.14
2.83
0
4.92
3.43
0
0
HOT-UDDS
2.71
0.14
2.80
0
0.38
0
0
0
122-31
COLD-UDDS
6.38
0.41
2.21
0
4.60
5.66
1.14
0
HOT-UDDS
1.83
0.41
2.69
0
0.48
0.57
0.18
0
0.13
0
0
0
0
0
0.14
0
0
0
0
0
0.19
0.20
0.01
0.03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.36
0
0
0
0
0
0.05
0
0.15
0.12
0
0.92
0.09
0
0
0.09
<0.01
<0.01
0
0
0.06
0
0
0.07
0
0.01
0
0.04
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-7. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 123 - Disabled EGR
Emissions in mg/km
V
oo
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamne
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
123-11
COLD-UDDS
6.73
2.43
4.31
1.79
3.95
HOT-UDDS
2.56
0.22
4.90
0.13
2.54
Malfunction
123-21
COLD-UDDS
9.45
0.49
1.83
2.43
0
HOT-UDDS
8.22
0.21
2.30
0.70
0
123-31
COLD-UDDS
7.10
0.32
2.24
3.42
0
HOT-UDDS
2.26
0.12
3.55
1.49
0
3.20
0.63
0
0
0
0.19
0.17
1.40
0.08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.39
0
0
0
0
0.18
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.82
1.91
0.48
0
0.27
0.07
2.04
0.75
0.33
0
0.18
0.08
2.54
1.18
0.32
0
0.27
0.20
0.95
0
0
0
0.06
0.07
0.25
0.05
0.01
0
0.07
0
0.02
0
0.07
0
0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-8. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 124 - High Oil Consumption
Emissions in mg/km
Unmodified
124-11
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
Malfunction
124-21
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
124-31
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
Total Particulate 5.95
Sulfates 2.62
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide 0
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine 0
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine 0
Trimethylamine 0.01
Diethylamine 0
Triethylamine 0
1.84
1.38
1.98
1.83
0.41
0
0.19
0.11
0.68
0
0
0
0.29
0.11
0
0.02
0
0
0
10.59
2.08
4.59
1.29
0
0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15.97
7.31
0
0
0
0
0
8.54
1.58
0.66
0.94
0.09
0
0.27
0.20
0.18
0
0
0
0.16
0.07
0
0
0.32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.11
0.16
0.10
0.09
0.14
0
0
0.07
0.15
0
0
0.01
<0.01
0
0
0.16
0.12
0.02
0
0.37
0.08
0.10
<0.01
0.17
0.06
0.01
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
-------
0. ITI- INDIVIDUAL SJ»MI'I,L KMISS !• .fir. Mi,::ii],TS
'lest Scr ics No. 1 J 1 - >-' i oh host id i.
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hvdroqen Sulfide
A1 drhydes & K_etpne_s
Formaldehyde
Aretaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl kctone
C rot ona1denyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldohyde
Organic Sulfj.jes
Carbony1 pulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Or'^anic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethy1amine & diroethylamine
Trimetliyl amine
Dirt hylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Kthylcnc
Ethane
Acetylene
I'ropane
Piopylcno
Belize nr
To I i>ono
Othe r
N i t roii?; Oxide
NK-kr 1 Carbonyl
6
5
1
0
0
2
2
4
0.
Unmodified
131-11
COLD-UDDS
3.63
1.17
3.42
0.08
0
1.64
0
0
0
0
0
0.07
0
0.11
0
0
0
0
o
0
COLO-HDDS
1 2
.60 2.51 4
.62 0.42 0
.37 0.67 0
.71 0
.14 O.O5 0
.27 0.03 0
-77 0.04
.07 0.29
40 0.06 0.
0 0
HOT-UDBF
1.28
0.93
1.82
0.05
0
0.67
0.17
0
0
0. 32
0
0
0.04
0.2'j
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDUS
3 4
.48 2.66
.66 0.29
.98 0.57
0 0
.07 0.04
.03 0
0 0
0 0
.14 0.05
0 0
131-21
rOLD-UDDK
—
2.28
5.45
0. 39
0
2.47
2.98
0. 74
0
o.sn
1.03
0
0-01
0.14
0
0
0.06
0
0
0
Emissions in (>pm
COLD-UDRS
1 2
2.22
0.24
0.19
0
—
—
1.5O
3.76
O.26 0
0 0
MOT-HDDS
79. 32
1.R9
3.33
0.29
0
0.5B
1. 39
0. 37
0
0. 70
IMS
0
0.04
0.1R
0
0.02
0.04
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3 4
5.52 0.49
0.46 0.03
0.57 0.05
0 0
—
—
0.19 0
1.22 0.39
0.01 0
0 0
Mai function
131-51
COLD-UDDS
--
1.73
2.08
0.27
0
1.71
0.4R
0
0
0.42
0.26
—
—
0
0.08
0
0
0
COLD-UDOS
1 2
11.86 2.55
10.58 0.12
1.70 0.17
1.85 0
5.96
4.46
5.75 0.12
10.74 0.39
0.25 0
0 0
'
HOT-UDDS
16.97
2.24
1.91
0.17
0
0.20
0.68
0
0
0.52
0.92
—
—
—
0
0.02
0
0
0
HOT-UDUF
3 4
6.29 3.46
0.54 0.12
0.51 0.15
0 0
—
—
0.45 0.14
0.55 0.50
0.05 0
0 0
-------
TABLE D-10. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 132 - Twelve Percent Ignition Misfire
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
132-11
Malfunction
132-21
COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
5.42
0.50
3.84
0.10
0
2.82
0.82
0
0
0
0.22
0.04
0.01
0.02
0
0.03
0.05
0
0
0
0.80
1.17
3.62
0.10
0
0.80
0
0
0
0
0.23
0.04
0.02
0.07
0
0
0
0
0
0
COLD-UDDS
4.73
0.58
3.43
0.21
0
7.22
2.90
0.33
0
0.19
0.13
0
0
0
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0
HOT-UDDS
1.39
0.90
2.06
0
0
1.48
0.91
0.14
0
0
0.13
0.35
0.01
0
0
0.02
0
0
0
0
132-31
COLD-UDDS
12.27
3.22
2.69
0.16
0
7.58
2.09
0.68
0
0
0
0.56
0.04
<0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
5.23
2.44
1.97
0.16
0
3.04
1.40
0.69
0
0
0.13
0
0.47
0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-ll. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 133 - Disabled EGR
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Is obutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethyiamine
Moncethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylardne
Triethylamine
Unmodified
133-11
COLD-UDDS
2.80
0.22
2.37
0.38
0
3.17
0.45
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3.77
0.55
14.59
0.09
0
0.66
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
133-21
COLD-UDDS
4.14
0.14
0.33
0
5.53
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
1.71
1.05
0.16
0
4.69
0
0
0
0
0
133-31
COLD-UDDS
0.73
0.12
0.20
0
7.69
0
0
0
0.11
0.78
HOT-UDDS
5.51
0.33
0.13
0
2.61
0
0.22
0
0.10
0
0
0.04
0.02
0
0
0.12
0.01
0
0.15
0.21
0.01
0
0.05
0.14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.03
0.06
0.11
0
0
0
0.03
0.04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-12. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 135 - No Air In j. + R.B.I.
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimcthylamine
Trirr.ethyiamine
Diethylamir.e
Triethylamine
Unmodified
135-11
COLD-UDDS
4.48
0.45
4.68
0.05
0
0.73
0
0
0
0
0
0.38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
5.82
0.71
6.74
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.42
0.14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
135-21
COLD-UDDS
19.08
0.36
8.60
1.93
O.lb
3.15
3.79
2.53
0
3.93
0.92
0.18
0.01
0
0
0.09
0.05
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
7.64
0.29
9.67
1.43
0.09
0.98
5.28
3.79
0
5.97
0.41
0.22
0
0
0
0.04
0.04
0
0
0
135-31
COLD-UDDS
23.94
1.73
19.58
2.09
0.08
1.78
3.65
1.66
0
3.90
0.13
0.34
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
13.63
0.70
12.91
1.04
0.11
0.72
1.23
0.54
0
2.32
0
0.16
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TAFM K !>-!'. ITi 1NU T- Il^'AL .'AMM.l IMI/T 'M ' '-
Tr.st c, ri->', N.J. 14i - ' i''h 1" .-' M k-
Total Partieulate
Sul fates
Amncnia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hvdro^en ,-ul fide
AKdejivdes £ Ke tones
Formaldehyde
Aret a Idehydf
Acetone
I Kobuty r al dfhyde
Methyl ethyl ketono
t'rotnna 1 deliyde
liexana Idehyde
Penzaldehvde
Orq.inic^ jiul f i-des
Cat bony 1 sul f ide
Methyl sulf ide
Ethyl sulfide
Mr-tliyl di^ulf idc
Mnnomot hylamine
Monoothylamine & dimethyl ami no
Tr i methylamine
Di ot hy 1 ami no
Tr i i'thy Itimine
I ml i^y_i<3ual_ j jy j_r_oc ar bpn s
Mt>thano
Ftliylen.-
Et luine
Acetylene
ft opylt ne
0
4
4
10
1
Un
COLD-OPUS
11.60
1.06
0.02
0
1 .15
0
0
0
o.or>
0.31
0
0
0.04
0
0.02
0
0
0
0
COLD-UDD.S
1 2
7.20 0
6.81 0.24
2.20 0.65
0.10 0
.13 0
.10 0
.77 0
.70 0.37
.14 0.43
0 0
mod L f 1 e J
141-11
HOT-PI I"!'
6.35
0.60
0
0
0.73
0.90
0
0
0. 3R
0.31
0
0.04
0.14
0
0.003
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
_ 3 4
3.94 2.23
0.75 0.75
2.02 1.68
0 0
0.13 0.08
0.34 0
0 0
0.90 0.72
O.87 0.27
0 0
Ma 1 1 'jnclion
1 4 1 - J ] 1 41 - 3 1
'•OLD-PMI'S H!.'T-UI.'l>.<; "OLD-UDUS HOT-l!UtjS
4.20 2.04 3.15 2.44
".2! 0.21 0.37 0.30
1-84 0.05 2.2ft 0.2C,
0.42 0.12 o.39 0.17
2.63 _ 0.32 2.51 n.46
1.77 0 1-14 o
0 ° 0.27 O..K>
0 0 o 0
0 0 0.14 0.14
0.22 0.35 0.14 0,28
00 00
0.01 • O.oi 0.07 0
0 O.,i2 0 0
00 00
0.0.' 0 0.02 0.16
0.02 0 0.04 0.03
o " o o
o o oo
00 00
Emissions in pj'm
rouj-UDDs HOT-OPUS COLD-UDDS HOT-UDDS
12 34 12 34
14.55 11.21 9.75 10.67 12.94 10.93 10.87 10.13
12.07 1.68 3.18 1.10 14.76 1.42 3.38 1.13
2.95 1.11 2.26 1.12 3.27 1.07 2.27 1.13
0.64 0 0 0 0.44 0 0 0
0.30 0.10 0.25 0.13 0.56 0.15 0.33 0.05
4.76 0.44 0.90 0.20 6.06 0.24 0.87 0.20
9.58 9.01 4.51 5.56 12.64 8.08 4.66 6.53
2.60 2.07 2.89 0.51 14.74 1.44 3.34 0.99
0.70 0.10 0.44 0.13 0.66 0.11 0.43 0.12
00 00 00 00
-------
TABLE D-14. FT? INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 142 - Twelve Percent Ignition Misfire
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylaraine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
142-11
COLD-UDDS
7.28
0.42
1.27
0.71
0
4.51
0
0.20
0
0.26
0.10
<0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3.37
0.63
1.26
0
0
3.90
0
0.12
0
0.27
0.24
0.17
0.04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
142-21
COLD-UDDS
14.65
—
2.13
0.40
0
7.45
5.02
2.68
0
0.88
0.23
0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
8.15
0.28
6.66
0
0
2.88
2.08
0.83
0
0.26
0.10
<0.01
0.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
142-31
COLD-UDDS
19.38
0.34
3.03
0.36
0
5.98
5.22
1.42
0.11
0.85
0.33
0.03
<0.01
0
0
0
0
0.01
0
0
HOT-UDDS
10.75
0.30
2.42
0
0
2.33
1.45
0.17
0
0.13
0.08
0
0
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-15. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series 143 - Disabled EGR and Air Pump
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Moncnethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
143-11
COLD-UDDS
11.76
0.29
0.76
0
3.89
0
0
0
0
0
0.06
0.01
0
0
0
0
0.21
0
0
HOT-UDDS
4.01
0.37
0.06
0
2.29
0
0
0
0
0
0.01
0.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
143-21
COLD-UDDS
13.77
0.56
2.85
0
3.54
0
0
0
0
1.72
0
0
0
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
8.39
0.15
0.73
0
4.94
0
0
0
0
2.13
0
0.01
0
0
0.04
0.04
0
0
0
143-31
COLD-UDDS
14.65
0.29
2.75
0
6.98
0
0
0
0
2.34
0.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
5.88
0.09
0.14
0
4.71
0
0
0
0
2.07
0
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-16. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 145 - No Air Inj. + R.B.I.
Emissions in mg/km
Unmodified
145-11
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Moncrnethyiamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Triiuethylamine
Diethylamine
Trie thy larnine
COLD-UDDS
19.39
3.68
—
—
0
3.28
0.09
0.09
0
0.18
—
0.11
—
—
—
—
—
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
1.51
2.31
—
—
0
3.64
0
0
0
0.18
—
0.11
—
0.11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
145-21
COLD-UDDS
15.81
11.15
—
—
0.32
0.56
0.77
0
0
0
—
0.07
—
0.03
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
13.17
0.81
—
—
0.86
0.19
0.49
0
0
0
—
0.21
—
0.82
0.02
0.01
0
0
0.03
0
0
0
145-31
COLD-UDDS
24.65
5.88
--
—
0.52
0.63
0
0
0
0
—
0.53
—
0.91
0.08
0.25
0.18
0
0.01
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
19.13
2.41
—
—
0.92
0.05
0
0.13
0
0
—
0.13
—
0.81
0.06
0.05
<0.01
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLL D-17 . FTP INDIVIDUAL S/'MPl.K EMISSIONS KKS
Tost SCL iJS No. 151 - Rich Host Idle
iii m')/km
00
Total Participate
Sul fates
Anunon ia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sul fide
Al d_ehy des
_ _ _ ^_
Formaldehyde
Aretaldehyde
Acetone.
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketonei
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde "
Benzaldehyde -
Organic Sul fides
Car bony! sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Tr i me thy lami ne
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Nothane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acptylene
1'ropane
Propylene
Bonzene
Tr»1 uonc
Other-
Nitrous-' Oxide
Nirkrl CaVbonyl
1
9.
10.
3.
0.
0.
5.
6.
• 4.
1.
Unmodi f led
151-11
COLD-UDDS
9.03
0.81
20.32
0.33
0.13
1.65
0
0
0
0.22
0.20
0
0
0
0
0.02
0.02
0
0
0
COLD-UDDS
2
06 2.79
54 0.34
14 1.54
42 0
28 0.54
26 0.21
35 1.81
45 1.81
21 0.39
0 0
Half unction
HOT-UDUK
2.19
0.55
10.24
0
0.26
1.37
0
0.47
0
0.53
0.20
0
0
0
0
0.01
0.03
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3 4
4.75 2.77
2.25 0.15
2.21 1.57
0 0
0.33 0.18
2.56 0.90
2.42 0.76
3.17 0.28
1.09 0.38
0 0
l'..l-21
COLD-HUMS
15.44
0.23
41.9U
7.4fi
0.41
3.33
1.64
0.90
0
0.03
0.23
0-09
0.14
0.11
0
0.02
0.05
0
0
0
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
1 2
25.75 24.71
33.81 35.34
4.68 4.68
0.59 0
0.39 0
11.39 8.51
18.76 11.81
32.08 8.98
0.91 : 1.32
.0 0
noT-unns
11.9-1
0.18
02.89
6.61
0.66
1.77
0.92
0
0
0.03
0.24
0.17
0.01
0.05
0.13
0.06
0.09
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3 4
22.25 20.39
29.62 29.19
4.80 4.31
0 0
0.39 0.55
8.61 7.38
13.91 11.58
22.13 17.77
1.49 1.64
0 0
151-31
COLD-UDDS
4.49
0.37
55.98
4.18
0.26
3.09
3.69
0
0
0
0.10
0.49
0.01
0.18
O
0.02
0.06
0
0
0
COLD-UDDS
1 2
28.57 16.94
36.31 3.29
5.10 3.34
1.14 0
1.04 0.10
10.55 5.56
18.16 8.74
28.81 12.57
0.59 1.17
0 0
IIOT-UUUS
5.91
0.29
62.02
6.17
0.84
1.19
1.64
0
0
0
0.24
0.07
0.46
0
0.02
0.12
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
3 4
21.44 21.
4.75 4.
4.80 4,
0
1.77 1.
7.14 6.
13.08 11.
19.07 17.
2 . 10 1 .
0
72
51
56
0
31
88
46
29
47
0
-------
TABLE D-18. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series 152 - Twelve Percent Ignition Misfire
Emissions in ng/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes a Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
I-lexanaldehyde
Benzaldohyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethyiamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trireethylamine
Die thy lair.i ne
Triethyiamine
Unmodified
152-11
COLD-UDDS
6.91
0.74
9.26
0.70
0
3.16
0
0
0
0.10
0.54
HOT-UDDS
0.62
0.34
10.99
0.63
0.43
1.99
0.65
0
0
0
0.03
Malfunction
152-21
COLD-UDDS
9.83
0.20
1.00
0
4.27
4.11
0.99
0
0.42
0
HOT-UDDS
2.39
0.04
0.54
0
1.00
0
0
0
0
0
152-31
COLD-UDDS
15.73
0.28
6.78
1.47
0
4.82
1.40
0
0
0
0.10
HOT-UDDS
3.42
0.08
10.49
0.52
0
1.44
0.93
0
0
0
0.10
0.07
0.04
<0.01
0
0
0.02
0
0
0
0.02
0.31
0.03
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
0.49
0
0
0
0.03
0.01
0
0
0.28
0
0
0
0.09
0.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-19. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 153 - Disabled EGR
Emissi ons in mg/km
to
o
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldchyde
Hcxanaldehyde
Benzaldchyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1am ine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylaniine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmodified
153-11
COLD-UDDS
7.38
0.46
3.78
0.68
0
2.42
2.60
0.69
0
0. 37
0.20
0
0
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
4.40
0.80
1.71
0
0.08
1.39
0.02
0.16
0
0.16
0.20
0
0.04
0
0
0.02
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
153-21
COLD-UDDS
12.46
0.40
1.59
1.14
0
3.22
0.43
0.07
0
0.21
0
0.02
0.09
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
7.01
0.14
2.79
0
0
3.38
0
0.07
0
0.21
1.98
0.01
0
0
0
0.03
0
0.03
0
0
153-31
COLD-UDDS
9.71
0.23
2.66
1.45
0
4.89
0
0.25
0
0.56
1.77
0.01
<0.01
0
0
0.03
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
6.83
0.18
2.55
0
0
3.63
0
0.43
0
0.97
2.57
0
0
0
0
0.09
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE D-20. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series No. 154 - High Oil Consumption
Eraissions in mg/km
V
to
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
>!o nome thy 1 iirn ine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamir.e
Diethylanine
Triethylamine
Unnodif ied
154-11
COLD-UDDS
12.58
0.87
0.10
0.95
0.91
0.11
0
0.21
0.10
0.52
0.04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-HDDS
5.04
0.42
0
0
0
0
0.18
0
0.10
0.35
0.17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malfunction
154-21
COLD-UDDS
19.11
29.21
0
1.04
1.10
0.11
0.10
0
0
1.16
0.02
0.08
0
0
0
0
0
0
HOT-UDDS
8.05
1.03
0
0
1.59
0.02
0
0.09
0
0.21
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
154-31
COLD-UDDS
10.10
11.75
0
1.69
0.91
0.19
0
0.20
0.25
0.58
0.05
0.06
0.01
0
0
0.01
0
0
HOT-UDDS
8.15
0.99
0
0
0.04
0.07
0
0.16
0.20
0.21
0.08
0
0
0
0
0.01
0
0
-------
APPENDIX E
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE TEST DATA
TABLES E-l through E-12
TABLES E-13 through E-24
TABLES E-25 through E-36
TABLES E-37 through E-48
TABLES E-49 through E-60
Car
11
12
13
14
15
Description
1977 AMC Pacer
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Chev. Malibu (Calif.)
1978 Ford Granada
1978 Ford Mustang II
-------
TABlf E-l. TEST 111 EMISSIONS RESULTS
I NO. I i 1-1 I rf"*
ICLt ^UO*L ?7 »^C •*•
lN* i.J L(.'SH CUD t--b
ttF, «(.T (IINV)
VOL (-1C*)
MM (Mt*SUIIf 0)
ii>MH)lTV C/Kli
t, C
i. C
«E KLE "0. U
H* CAMT NII. i
Cv '(U. i
*«!. HiiMlulT/ 4.v CM/KG
1 i
COLO THAN3IENT STABILIZED
7*2.0 (ID. 11) 7hj.O (Jil.O)
>b2.D (3U.U) l*i,<) (30.0)
t}.} (lin. ci) *j.3 (iio. o)
I1*.1*/ 3/ I1*' SU.U/ i/ 40
1.5/ 3/ IS 1». I/ ?/ 11
4.4/ )/ .08 4,*/ )/ .07
.b/ 2/ 1 .b/ i/ 1
*..0i 14. *«
131 37
lib* 161
l.*b .81
45.7 27.4
S. 77 J. 7
121.70 21. U
17b2.» US).
b.ll b.b
.4* .4
4U.4£ * , S
3113. U 315.
1.10 l.l
H. 47 13.*
5U5 bb7
6. SO 6.5S
S.i* b.2U
.417 ( .40*)
l.OOU ( .4*1}
4U7.8
12.01
Ulf ICU
TEST -tJGMI
CA30LINC E*l-
F)
3
MCT THAHSUNr
7h2.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (JO.O)
"3.3 (1 10. 0)
•1.2/ 2/ Ul
12. b/ 2/ 1)
l.i/1*/ 2
H.3/ J/ .0?
.?/ i/ 1
1U.43
70
ios
1.11
4** * 5
3.31
If . IS
Ibbl. 7
b.SS
.S3
3. li
2Hb.§
1.20
U.5)
su»
6.SS
s">.
.42
1 .00
D10K1DE &/KM
MdUKS (THC) C/KM
!&•• -KW( IfcDO LbS)
SUtHLI^ED
7b2.0 (30.0)
7bi.O (30.0)
tJ.i (110. 0)
131.0 ltb2l, )
13. &l i/ l
*7 , t / ll/ m
l.i/li/
•*«•*/ */ ,ut
.»/ J/ *J
IS. Si
)D
44
. 7t
27. *
i.lU
1 b. 1 1
llbU.
b,S
. j
^.»
300.
1.0
11. U
H.7
6.30
b.14
« ( .lib
0 ( ,4id
2lf '.
U."
3- »C (».«
30 .4 ( JQU
• H ( ,
1.11 ( 1 .
VEHICLE MHOEL 77 AMC
ENGINf i.i LC^St CIO) l
TRANSMISSION A3
111-U
SET
I
S/Hi/7*
17S*«<«< 104HHKtS)
2-1-3
TE3T HEIGHT IS
II1-19
HFET
nLOMER OIF P MM. HtUUn. H?U)
»LP1<6(' INLET p nn. H?m IM. M^OJ
SLOWED I'lLtT TEMP. fiSC. C(OEC. f)
WLOwFR RFVOLUTIHN5
CVS ftOM STD. CU. H€THtS(3t')
MC SAMPLE «€Te»/B*t4Ge/fpi«
ct>? caNce
itC "«33
TEST MJMKF.
ilAHOMETEPf
HtJMlOIIV,
5/K&
'Jtr, c
fir, r
n» r, c
FUFL CONSUMPTION, C/l"""
C4BMOH iriNnxitlF, 6/«M
7W.O (JO.O)
?(>*.o On. a)
»).•» ( 111.0)
Il?t2*
^04. 4 (?»M.
fcl.W i/ b
I 70
1.93
70. i
b.db
21.13
11 1-1?
j.n (30.0)
a.o ( 30. >J)
115. 1 UUbb.S)
73. 4/ 2/ 7»
41.S/I2/ £?1
l.D/ i/ .07
37.e/ 3/ 112
34b 1.0
->1.UB
d^J ( .K^V)
I1.UI ( .473)
1 1^.1
Ib.St
111-13
m.i
4.0
E-2
-------
TABU E-2. TEST 111 EMISSIONS RESULTS
rt* VEHICLE IMUIIONI MIULTI . men MIT ion
••OJICT 1IMTT1-001
TUT NO. Ill-Fl RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 17 AMC FICER
ENGINE *,l L(MI CIO) L-k
•AROMfTCR 711. kl MM MG(t*.0* IN MO)
RELATIVE "UMTOItr 10 FCT
111 RE9ULTI
• AC NUMICR
•LONE* OIF F MM, H(0(IN. HIO)
•LONER INLET F MM. HfOMN. MtO)
HONE* INLET TEMF. DEC. C(OEO. F)
•LONER RCVOLUTIONS
Cvi FLON s'o. cu. METRts(iCF)
MC BCXORo Nf TER/RANOE/RRM
CO (AMRLf «f TER'RANGE/MM
COI 9ANRLE Mf TER'RANOt/FCT
COI GC«JRO M[TfR/RANOE/FCT
NOI 9AMFLE «F'lR'RANCt'F»«
OILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION RRM
CO CONCENTRATION MM
COI CONCENTRATION «CT
NOI CONCENTRATION FRM
HC "All GRAMS
CO MAII GRAM9
C0> Mil] GRAMI
NOI MAS! «RAu9
HC CRAMI/KM
CO GRAN9/«M
COI ORAM9/«M
FUEL eoN9u"»TioN i» c« L/IOO«M
•UN TIME IECONDI
CATALTlT AVC' TEMF. OEO. C
CtTALTRT MAI. TEHF. OEG. C
HfAIURCO M5T1NCE «"
O'C. NET (ORV)
1CF, MET (0«1>
VOL (9CM)
COMFOIHE REIULTI
TUT NUNIFR 111-11
•AROMETtR "M HC 717, k
HUHIOITT C/F.O •.•
TENREIATURE OfG C tf.l
VEHICLE MOOH 77 A"C FACER
TEST NUMBER
TE9T CTCLf.
•UN NUM(ER
OATt
OOOMITER
TINRERATURC oco. c (OEG. FI
RELATIVE HU«IOITT. FCT
•AROMCTER. MM HO(IN HG)
RUN TIME. 1ECONOI
•LONE* OIF F «M. HIOMN, "101
•LONER INLET • MM. M(O(!N, MID
ILONIR INLET TEMF. HIS. CIDEO. F)
•L0»(* REVOLUTIONS
cvi FLON JTO. cu. METREKSCF)
COI 9AMRLE MfT(«/RtNCE/FCT
HC CONCENTRATION FRM
CO CONCtN'RAMON FF«
CO! CONCENTRATION FCT
N0» CONCENTRATION FRM
MC MAI9 CR'MI
CO MAI9 GRIMI
COI MA9| eRAHl
NOI MAI9 QRftMl
OFC* NET (ORV)
ICF. NET (OIT)
VOL (9CM|
TEIT NUMF.ER. FVMT
•AROMETER, "" HO
HUMI01TT. 0/«G
TEMRlRATIIRt, OEG C
TOTAL FUEL IIILFUR, »«/««
AVG, UN'. oivOEN, FCT
CATAL'tT AVC TEMF., OEG C
CATAL'ST «AI. TEM»., DEC C
ORION OlOHOE. •/«"
FU(L CONSuMRTlON, U100F.H
HTDROCARgQNS. G/«N
CkRtON MQhOllOCr ' C/HM
OltOtl OF NITROGEN. 9/«M
VEHICLE NO. 11
OATt t'lt/11
SAG CART NO. 1
OTNO NO. 1
CVt NO, 1
OFT IUL> TEHR, |i,|
l.kl
71.1
l.ll
lil.II
kKk.t
17. ••
.171 ( .Ikk)
1,000 ( ,471)
101. 1
11.70
Ill-It
71k. k
lk!l
It. 71
4.15
til. I
11.11
• ft
l.'l
I.Ik
TEST MIIGHT KM
F.G! 1100 LBS1
CAIOUNE EN-1>«
OOOMITE* 1111 KM( 1111 NILEI)
DEC CI71.0 OEG F)
0"/«t NOI HUHIOITT CORRECTION FACTOR
1 1 •
ITtGILIItO HOT TRANSIENT STABILIZED
7ki.O (10.0) 7kf.O (10.0) 7ki.O (10.0)
7kl.O (10.9) Ikl.O (10.0) Ikl.D (10.0)
•1.* (111.0) •].] (119.0) *1.1 (110.01
kRkOk «0k74 k«OI
11*.* CM'i.O) 71,7 (Ik7*,k) If*,* (*tk*.l)
*7,f/ t/ *7 1«,0/ I/ 1*0 •!,!/ It •!
Ik,)/ It Ik 1.7/ I/ 17 IS. It it 14
I.I/ it ,0k 1,1/ ]/ ,01
.11 II 1 ,!/ It 1
11. kl R,k*
II lit
kt* 7*k
.»» 1.1*
II. 1 Ik.l
f.*° !.•>
M.I* 70. tl
tttl.* 17t*.<
'.'1 7.71
Ikioi Ititi
Ikl.O 1**.*
l.tk l.ll
Ik.kl tl.71
•k7 «
•io> ilooo (
9t.l
CARBON OIOKIOe C/KM
FUtL CONSUMFTION L/100IH
H»0»OCAR«ONS (THO S/«M
CARBON HONOIIDE O/F.M
OIIDEI OF NITROGEN C/«"
1 ItJULTS - RICH ICST IDLE
101
TEST kCICHT 1IFI
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD
LIS) GASOLINE EM-I44
tll-ll
MFET
I
I/U/7I
tlllF.H( llfkMILES)
1 - 1 - 1
tk.l / 7R.O
•I.I
7|k.k (tR.OO)
HI
'kl.O (10. 0)
>k».0 (10.0)
•»,« (111,0)
kid*
11*. 1 (*01k,0)
11, k/ t/ 7k
It.*/ I/ 11
1*.ft/ll/ Ilk
1.1/11' 1
•I.I/ II t.Ot
1,1' It .Of
11. I/ !/ Ill
.*/ it 1
k<
10k
11*. »
•.Ik
• O.k7
•IH.k
.1*7 ( .l«0)
1.000 ( ,*7»
11*. 1
Ik. Ik
lll-ll
71k. k
>k!l
It. 71
4.M
•
11*.)
.fk
1.90
*•'
I.k/ I/ ,0k
I*.I/ II !•
••/ t/ t
11, M
J«
.11
11,1
t.l<
7.11
l»!ll
i.ii
U,«k
Ikk
3.85
k.lf
.*IO)
fOf.l
11. Ik
•-•AC If
11*,* ( 11
11. >7 I 11
.7* (
to. »0 ( 1'
l.f« ( 1
>'( 1900 LI9)
•.I ««( 11,1 HF)
E-3
-------
TABLE E-3. TEST 111 EMISSIONS RESULTS
nr VEHICLE EMISSIONS CT
NOI CONCENTRIMON "'
MC Hit) QRAMI
CO MIIJ giml
COf "Ml (Kill
•01 "IS 0«'MI
HC CRAMg/NM
CO CPAMS/KM
COf 6RAMS/KM
NOI GRiMI/KM
'UEL CONIUMPTION «r cl L/IDO«M
•UN n»E
AvG, EIM'. OIVCEN
CATALYST MAI' TEMP!
MEAIURBO DISTANCE
OFC, MET (DRV)
SCP. MET (ORV)
VOL (!
COHPOIITE
TEST NU
KESULTt
HUHIDITV
T€»»I»»Tu«€
O/KG
0(0 C
KCONOI
PERCENT
DEC. C
OBO. C
KM
10.1
11,1
VEHICLE NO. 11
oire «/!*/?•
• 1C C»T NO, 1
OVNO NO. 1
CVI NO. >
0" lull 'f"». ».> °EO C(»,0 OEC r>
10.1 «""«
TEST HCIOHT 1111 KCC 1100 LSI)
1CTU1L """> L0>0 «,» «»l II.1 »•)
O90LINE f-3<«
OOOHETE* "00 KM( l)bf MILES)
NOI «U«IOITY COMtCTION
COLO TRANSIENT
Jkl.O (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
11.1 (111.0)
7«.l (Ikll.O
I*. I/ I/ t*
I.I/ 1' I
II,I/ f/ )01
.I/ f/ 1
7«,7/ It 1,1
I.I/ f/ .0
II.I/ I/ 1
l.O/ I/
l.ll
»«.»
*.!<
111.11
llll.t
111,0
.•'
Ik.II
'ki.O (10.0)
7kl.
•I.
HI.
10. 1
17,1
11. 1
»«!i
i.i
ti.i
,i
(10.0)
(111.0)
•kll
11111,1)
11 10
11 l»
M 711
I/ 1.01
I/ ,01
It !•
I/ 1
11.11
1.0
101,7
II.••
HOT TRANSIENT
7kl.Q (10.0)
7kl,0 00.0)
11.1 (111,0)
lOkOk
11«
II
HI
11.«/ I/
I.I/ I/
11.•/ I/
kl.l/ I/ I.Ik
• .«,/ I/ .01
II.I/ |/ II
!.•/ */ I
kt.7!
Ulk
11.3
111.
I.I
101
S.6S
7kl.O (30,0)
71,1,0 (10,0)
•1.1 (110.0)
m.i Kin
IS,I/ I/ '
10.•/ I/ t
Ik,*/ I/ ki
Illi/ I/ .'
1.7/ I/ ,0
II,b/ I/ 11
I.I/ I/ 1
11.i
i»!>o
l«. kl
l»k,I
• kk
J.W)
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MO/KM 11,11
AVC. BIM. OIVCEN PCT 4.25
CATALYST »VO. TEMP. OEG C •
CATALYST MAI. TEMP, OEC C •
CARSON OIOHIOE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CAIION MONOItDE
OHMS OF NITROGEN
.•11 (
1.000 (
C/KM
G/«M
310,1
IS.kl
.It
11,17
1.1'
( lli.t)
( IS.Ik)
( ,71)
( I0,lb)
( l.lb)
PVM . Ill SBT VEHICLE EMISSION! RESULTS - RICH P.EST IDLE
VEHICLE MODEL 77 AHC PACER
ENGINE l.t L(IS< CIO) L-b
TEST NU-*[*
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMICR
DATE
OOOMITER
CVI . BAG CART . OVNAMQMETER
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (OEC, F)
RELATIVE MUHTDTTV, PCT
BAROMETER. MB MG(IN HC)
•UN TIM|, SECONDS
Ho«tER OIF P MM. HtodN. MPO)
BLOHER INLET • MM. MtOdN. HIO)
•LO«ER INLET TEMP. OBC. C(OEC. F)
ILOHER REVOLUTIONS
cvs «LO« STO. cu. METREKSCFI
HC Renown MBTER/RANCE/PPM
COt lAM*>tc ..rTE»/H*NCt/.»CT
cot BCHCIO -rrea/niNce/nct
NOI tc-toHn Mf rfff/RAtoE/^^-*
MC COXClHTU
co CONCF-*T.»
COr CONCfuTR
NOl CONCfijTi
riON »»w
TION •>»»•
TTON F»CT
TION »»•
9
COt M||, gll
NOI MASS 0"A
OFC. HE
SCF, HE
VOL (SC
KM (ME
(OPT)
1UREO)
TEST NUNR'R,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE ,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
AVC, EIN. OIVCEN,
CARSON 01QIIOE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
PVMT
MH HO
G/«G
OE6 C
MC/KM
PCT
OEG C
OEC C
C/"M
L/IOOKM
ORSON MltNOItQFi
OI10EI OF NITtOCEN.
C/«M
5/«H
VEHICLE "0. "
TMNSHISIION >1
CVM l«kl «6( 'Itk LI9)
111.11
SET
1
l/lk/'l
JIII«M( HlkMlLEi)
I . I - 1
tk.l / ".0
•0,1
711.1 (M.M)
>kl.O (10.0)
Tkl.O |IO. 0)
•1.1 (110.0)
llfl'J
107.3 (7110.1)
Tn.l/ It 71
II. •/ tl II
M.I/ I/ <>7
.!/ I/ t
I*. I/ I/ l.bl
• .O/ )/ .Ok
71. •/ t/ >•
I.I/ t> 1
tl
III
l.!7
71,1
••bT.7
17, G( 1SOO L8J)
>CTUIL «0«0 LOIO •,! KH( It.] HP)
OIOLINE EM-J«*
111.11
Hf[T
1
) • 1 - I
It. 7 / 10,0
II.*
711.1 (tl.'O)
7kl
JkJ.O (10.0)
7kt.O (30.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
bKll
111.7 OOlk.O)
b/ I/
7/1I/
• /It/
• / I/
•/ I/
11 I/
•/ I/
bl
ini
110. k
«,!«
I'."
11H.O
l», II
l»1 ( .
goo ( .
111.7
lk.ll
»•
III
I
I. OS
.07
lit
1
111)
• X)
111*11
ik.7
tl.kl
til.l
11.00
E-1
-------
TABLE E-t. TEST 112 01ISS10HS RESULTS
lit MP VEHICLE EH I SIIONS -tESlJLM
PROJECT 11-»*7I-001
VEHICLE NUlifL M **C PAC
t*C INC *.* LUM C1D) L-t»
l>*NSMll§l(>N A)
|4fcf KC( *m LM3)
IELATIVE HUHIDITf »7
AO RE 3ULM
MAC NUHRER
BCKGRO MfTEB/RANtif /PPM
PCT
ftLOfCR OIF P t«% H40(lN. HfO)
BLOKE" INLET P HH. i?0(jN. M*O>
BLOMEU INLET TEMP. DEB. C(DEC. f)
BIO" EH HEVULUTIUNS
CVS 'LOW STO. CU.
MC 8»HPLE HEIEH/R
HC BCKGRD NETEB/a
CO
CO
COf
co» acKCRo «ETER/R»"GE/PCT
MQl tK*G*Q '•CTtH.'Rfct.&E/PP"
DILUTION *ACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
co» coNCCNVftftiioM PU
NOI CONCENTRATION P^N
HC N*SS CRAMS
CO? MASS GRANS
NOX HASS CRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAH3/KM
CO? CRAMS/MM
HOt CRAMS/KM
'DEL CONSUMPTION 8T C8 U'l
TtM
DUN TIME
AVC* Elrt.
CATALMT
CATALYST MAX.
MEASURED 01S ANCt
OFC» «C (DRV)
SCF. «E (QHV)
»OL CSC )
KN (HE 3UAEO)
SECONDS
PEPCCNT
DEC. C
OEC. C
KH
VtHULl ND. 11
DATE b/10/71
BAC CART »n. i
DYNO NO. <
CVI NO. 1
OKI BUH TEHP. Ib.
IBS. HUMIDITY 11.'
1
COLD TRANSIENT
7bl.O (10.0)
Ikl.O (30.0)
'3.1 (110.0)
'ObR'
7k.) (lk'b.0)
l.tt/ )/ JO
71. SI I/ 1«10
.'/ 3/ N
7b.R/ )/ l.'l
3.S/ 3/ ,0f
•^/ */ 1
1.1'
III
IRIf
I.Ik
'(.•
k."
Ikl.lJ
1IRI.'
k.'l
l.il
11.10
310.1
l.il
lb.ll
sot
t.lt
1 DEC C(7R.O DM F>
SM/K8
I
STAtlLUID
7b?.D (10.0)
7bt.l) (1D.D)
'1.3 (110.9)
k'H7
130. b Oklt.O)
It.b/ tl 13
71.7/11/ lit
i,b/l>/ I
'.t/ I/ .Ok
I.O/ il 1
11.17
tl
101
.17
11.1
1.1*
'b.l'
1071.7
1.7*
.1'
7. SI
!3«.l
l.'l
11.07
• b!
t.bO
TEST HEIGHT 1511
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
(U&OLIME EH-1"
ODONITER 'OH «H(
KGl ItOO LI5)
'.1 «•( It.i H
»nt MILED
NOX HUNIDITV CORRECTION FACTOR 1
}
HOT TRANSIENT
7kl.O (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
'1.1 U10.0)
'OlkR
7i.S dkk?.')
10. I/ 3/ 101
l.t/ 3/ It
t.'/ll/ 7
S.I/ 3 .01 '
Sl.k/ i S'
I.I/ 1 I
4. 0
R
't
1.1'
St.l
'.tl
IR.lt
17U.I
7.M
.7'
b.l'
IM.b
1.1'
11.10
SOI
S.OI
stAiiLUeo
7bl.O (10.0)
7bt.O (10.0)
'1.1 (110.0)
k'kQt
190. < ('bid. >
SI. I/ */ S
11. I/ t/ 1
l.'/ll/
11. '/ 3/ .'
»,?/ 3/ .07
I'.k/ t/ If
I.'/ I/ 1
l'.17
ftR
.1'
11. f
1.11
I'.IO
IDOO.O
l.l'
.SI
1 ,fcl
llk.k
1 . "
!>.!'
Ik7
f.tl
!.'> k.ll
.»10 ( .•")
1.000 ( .»>•>
J0»,1
11.11
>0b.l
NM HB 'M.<
C/NC IT,»
OEC C Zb.l
10HV. rutl 5U1.PUO »t/KH
AV6. EVH« UtTCE" PCT
ciT«cm »ve. TIM*. DCS c
omvsr Kti. it". DEO c
11.71
CARBON DIDIIDC S/KN
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KN
HYOROCAKSONS (INC.) 6/«»
CARBON NDNOIIDC C/KH
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
u.n
l.M
C IH.»)
( It.kl)
( 11.10)
I !.»•>
> - 111 SBT VEHICLE EK1S910HS RISUL1S - UNMODIFIED
77 «MC RtcCR
t CIO) l.b
XHICIE noOEL
l.i H!
Test NUHOC*
TEST C
•l.k/ ?/
k.l/ >/
.
I
1.7/tl/
»»,!/ «/
!.•/ I/
U.I/ 3/
.«/ 3/
77
ill
l.RO
It.)
11.0?
'.bb
l'k.3
10.7-*
.11
'.J!
1.31
l.R
.0
<
E-5
-------
E:5:.. JEST.U2.BJISSIONS RESULTS
FE»T NO. ll*-ll «UN i VEHICLE MO. 1
VEHICLE "OOEL tf »MC PACE" 0*TE 7/ 7/7
ENGINE *.2 L(«l CIW) L-b 8*6 CART NO.
TRANSMISSION M OV>*0 NO.
BAG RESULTS
BAfi NUHMCR
DESCRIPTION
BLOMER INLET P
1
UN. N*Q(lN. Hi(l> 7b2.0 (30.0)
BLOMER RFVOIUMOIS »0b$l
C"* 'LUM JTO. CU. METRESlSCF) >b.3 (2b4S.O)
MC SAMPLE "CrtR/RANGE'PPM lb.fi/ •»/ IbOO
CO BC«C»D MET
CO* SAMPLE "E T
co/ BC«GRO NET
R/RA«GE/PCT 7«.i/ s/ 1.37
ER/OANCE/PCT 3.I/ 3/ .Ob
NO* BCK0MO 1ETER/*ANCE/PPM 2.S/ 2/ )
Co CONCENTRATION *•• »>23S
NOK CONCENTRAT
MC HISS GR*N9
C0| "OS GRAMS
NO* "ASS GHA-J
CO GRA*3/KH
C0| CR»M.n/«H
•UN TJMC
ON PPM *B.l
b4.h*
14B.bl
11*1. b
7.1%
12.03
5*. 31
311.1
1ECONOS SOS
(xP. OfC. C
O^C* MET (DRT) .40* ( .1
SCF, MET (t»»») 1.008 ( .«
VUL (5C-) 20
KM (MCASURCOI 11
COMPOS I ft HE SUIT 1
TEJt NUNBEM U2-M TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MC/«N 13. s»
001
TEST «|
ACTUAL
Ct30Ll»
OOONCTI
2 1
STABILIZED HOT T«A
7h;.0 (3D.O) 7bf.O (
7b2.0 (30.0) 7bi.O (
»3.3 (110.0) *1.4 (
b4«7t »0b
130. b (*bl2.0) 7b.2 (
+.1/11S It .b/ 3
Sl.3/ 3/ .14 b7.7/ 3
*.2/ 3/ .Ob *.b^ 3
2.b/ 2/ 3 l.O/ 2
13.04 4.
•12 1 •
3SI 4
.IV 1 1
* .4 b .
b .b S .
S .* ' .
14 1. lb 0
1 .«
1 .0
.7 1 .
31. 21
.7
1 .J 1 .
• b7 SO
7. If 1.0
b.tB S.7
45)
• 1)
b.4
.4R
CARBON DIQMDE
HUMIDITY t/«6 II. 1 CATALYST ivc. TEMP. OEC C • HYDROCARBONS (T"C)
PVH - n2 $BT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULT* * IGNITION "J3F1
PROJECT 11*1771-001
VEHICLE NO. 11 TEST
TEST NUHBER
ffl? CYCLE
R>JN NU*Bt«
OATt
OOOMCTCR
112-21
SCT
1
tl 7/>R
lEMPCRATURE DEC. C (UEG. ») 2'.l / •2.0
•*eL*TI»E HONlDJTf, PCT »*.b
RUN i t*r , sec
C*» *LO» 3!0.
COl CO**CENTRA
CO »A)9 GRAM
o'C, «er
SCF, MET
• '•L (SC»
E9T HUM-BE ••
ARONEIf R,
U-IOI'r,
CMPFR1TUAC.
01)0(3 DF NIT
JNOS 1347
1««. N?t)(lN. M^LJ) >*2.0 (10.0)
IGM 112211
TID* PCT I.*B
S 17*. 77
3 177.37
S S712.*
(0-0 . Is* ( .It,*)
(OR») 1.000 ( ,4?|>
> HO.t
PW»T iii-ii
"M H6 7*1.4)
S/KG id. .)
"'^ C 17. •
G/HH I.Ob
ROCF.N. C/»-< 1. )•
b LM) CAflOL
112-23
MFCT
1
7/ ?/»•
2-1-3
*1.S
7*?.* (24.23)
7bb
7b2.0 (30.0)
*3.1 (110.0)
b2l*'
U7.1 l»13».l>
I'.*/ »/ 1»»0
.!/ •/ 10
.»/ J/ *
*3.0/ */ 1.40
I.*/ 2/ .OS
3«.7/ ]/ i07
l.l/ )/ 1
1732
71*
l.lb
10*. 3
lib. 41
47. S2
3477.*
23.52
.1*0 ( .t3»)
1.000 ( .47&)
117.1
lb.14
ll*-*J
7*2.*
10.4
24.*
2*. '3
S.30
**S.7
U.«7
7.22
b.02
l.»»
ICHT 1%|B KG( 3SOO LDB)
ROAO LO«D 4.2 KN( 12.} HP)
E EN-]**
R V4QS KH( )?]? MIL.E3)
IDITY COBRECTIJt. FACTOR l,ui
*
aiENT SUIIU1ZED
0.0) 7bt.O (30.0)
0.0) 7fc2.0 (30.0)
U.O) *>3.3 (110. U)
I b4271
b4Q.l) 110.0 (*S41.7)
1» 3.7/11/ u
1.22 50. O/ 3/ .17
' .07 3.V 3/ .Ofc
1 2.7/ 2/ 3
7 13. bl
) Ib7
< 2SB
i .11
' *.b
17 S.01
» 4.U
0 1 32.5
<7 i.l*
'S 10.70
fh b.*t
* 311.1
IS l.H«
)> IS.tb
• h)
l.l*
1 b.DI
.41* ( .10b)
1.000 { .412)
20b.«
11. §b
»-«*C (
&/KH 30B.7 (
C/KN 10.41 (
6/RM IS.&* (
RE
"CIGhl 15IB KG( 3SOO L8.
1NE E«»-J**
/ /
E9)
*-BAC>
307.7)
IS.Sh)
111.74)
l*.3b)
l.b<)
)
E-6
-------
TABLE E-6. TEST 112 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TESI to, ll*Oi "UN
VEHICLE MODEL 77 *NC P»
ENGINE *.? L(?SB cio) L-k
TRANSMISSION Ai
CVN Hfc* KC( *J2fc LU3)
«EL*TIVF "UHionr kO
116 RESULTS
BAC wUKiUN
DESCRIPTION
P-LOMER INLET p HH. 1*201 IN; H?O)
RLO*CR INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
(»LO«*ER HtVOLUTIONS
CV3 FLO* 3TO. CU. M£TRM(5CF)
MC SAMPLE MtTER/RANGE/PPN
CO BCKCAO METER/R.ANGE/PPN
CO? 3AHPLE HETER/RANCE/*CT
CO? BCKCtfO METER/RANGE/PCT
NO* SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
NOI BCKGRO METER/RANGe/M>N
OII.UTIOM FACTO"
r*C CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PP*
CO* CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
MC NASS GRAMS
CO CRAMS/KM
CO? CRAHJ/NM
run. cONSunrtiON «i c> I/IOOKH
»U« line SECONDS
MCA3UREO DISTANCE
DFC» «ET (DRY)
SCF, NCT (OUT)
VOL (SCH)
KM (MCA3UHED)
MPOSITE «CSULT9
TEST MUNAER 1
BARONETED MM MC
MUMIQITT tt/NG
TEMPERATUHE DEC c
DEC. C
DEC. C
PROJECT 11-1771
VEHICLE NO. 11
BAG CART NO. J
CVS NO." 2
ABS. HUMIDITY <.k
i
COLO TRANSIENT
7fc2.0 (90.0)
7k2.0 (30.0)
*1.3 (110.0)
ffe.b°»w.n
.!/ I/ 2
ill/ 9/ iok
1.2/ 11 1
7.72
1579
2901
1 * 21
tl.k
11. 'k
201. SI
1011. S
7.Sk
12.01
11.10
llk.O
l.li
17.52
SOS
k.10
-001
GM/KS
t
auglLitto
'k2.0 (10.0)
7k2.0 (90.0)
19.9 (110.0)
110.1 (Ikll.O)
Sli' l' 21
l.i/ll/ 1
l.l/ I/ .Ok
.k/ 11 \
19. SI
117
219
.12
»2.2
kk.ll
11. fc*
1M2.1
12.11
10.11
'. 90
9H.1
<.0k
11. kO
Ik7
7.11
s>5oimc CH-III
«oi HumoiTr com
i
HOT TAAMaUNT
7fca.O (90.0)
7k2.0 (90.0)
19.9 (110.0)
IQIkl
7k. 2 (2k10.0>
O.o/ I/
.!/ 9/
l.S/ I/ .0
.k/ 11 1
1.79
1*10
blk
1.11
72. »
i9.lt
$7.21
If 11.1
10.11
1.10
10.02
270.1
1.71
11.11
lot
k.lk
t
3K8IU1CO
7k2.0 (90.0)
7k2.0 (90.0)
19.9 (110.0)
klklk
9.S/ it 91
.k/11/ 2
!.«/ I/ .Ok
l.k/ 2/ 2
11.11
»k
211
. 71
12.1
kl.il
17.22
11)2.1
12. ki
10. i9
k.07
301. «
2.0t
11.17
Ik7
k.11
.^17 ( .*0k)
l.OOD ( . S/KH
CARBON MONOII0€ G/AM
OX10CS OF NITROGEN G/KM
307.S
l».Sl
10.73
13. M
VEHICLE MODEL
77 ANC RAC
I CIO) L-h
TEST NUMBER
TEST CTCLE
RUN NUMBER
OATC
OUOMETER
CVS - BAR CANT - OTNAMQHETER
RCL'Mvf HUMIDITY, PCT
9APQMETCR. MM HC(|N NO)
HUM TINE, SECONDS
PVM - U2 SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RCSUL.TJ - ItN|TION MISFIRE
PROJECT U-»7J1-001
VEHICLE NO. 11
TRiNSNlSSlON AI
GVM Mfc? KC( «)4h LBS1
UJ-J?
SET
7/IO/7B
»5MKN( etl7MtLE3>
t - I - J
?k.7 / BU.O
TEST HEIGHT 1MB KG( 3SOO L9S>
•CTUAL ROAO LOAD A.J KH( 1J.| HP)
112-3}
MFET
.? / BO.O
»0.t>
.» (2^.21)
BLO»ER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
m.o«ER INLET P MM. NIDI IN. M?O>
BLOHER INLET TEMP, one. CCDEG. F
BLO«ER DEVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO- STD. CU. NtrO£3(1CF)
MC SAMPLE METER/RAMCE/PP
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE,
CO BCKCRO "F.TER/ftANGC.
CD? 3AHP..E M£TEft/R»NGE/PC
co? acxGRo METER/RANGE/PC
NOi SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PP
NOI acKCRo METER/R*NCC/PP
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
N0» CONCENTRATION PPM
HC M«33 (RAMS
CO MASS &H»M3
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOV MASS GRAM3
OFC, «ET (ORY)
SCf, WET (0**Y)
vOt (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER* PVMT
BAROMETER. MM HI
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
OCG C
MG/KH
CARBON 010>tloe,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
DfG c
r>EG C
7b7 ( .ttjfl)
1.000 ( .477)
210.9
1 12-1
7*2. •»
13. Ot
I. I?
(10.0)
OO.O)
(112.01
011DES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
•l.k/ 2/
l.l/ 2/
US.*
12B.S1
Ub.13
.11? ( .
I. 000 ( .
Ilk.*
Ik. 1«
11.7
II. 1
2k. II
2*7.S
12.31
>.*k
in.17
l.fcV
E-7
-------
TABLE E-7. TEST 113 EHISSIOHS RESULTS
VM I4b2 KG( *32* LBS)
*• RESULTS
• AC *U«BER
DESCRIPTION
8LOMER OIF * NN. H20(1N. H20)
•LO*ER INLET * MM. M2odN. «*o)
OILUI ION f KTOft
MC CONCENTRATION P*N
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOv CONCENTRATION FPN
CO CDAHS/KH
AVG. t'H. OIVCEN PERCENT
MEASURED DISTANCE KN
OFC. itf. T (DRY)
SCF, »fT (DW)
VOL (SCH)
CON.P04.lTe RESULTS
t£ll NUN6ER 111-11 TOTAL
tNQlNC *.i L(2SI CIO) L-»
TUT NUMBER
IFST CHL«
RUN NUMBER
OATf
oooMf TER
RUN TIME, SECONDS
CO MASS CRAMS
NOI "A9S CRAM!
OfC. »ET tDRT)
SCF, MCT (DRV)
VOL (SCH)
KN (MEASURED)
TE*4) 1
210. b
21. S4
113-1?
2b. 7
S, 3)
1 l.*l
F)
3
MOT TRAMSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
7b2.U (30.0)
*3.J (11U.O)
7%.S (2702. S)
l.D/ 3/ 10
*.4/ll/ iS
70. S/ 3/ 1.27
».*/ 3/ .OS
Si.l/ 2/ SI
1.3> 2/ 1
ill
1.10
.•b
5.2$
302. b
SOb
S.bl
1 .000
010MDC C/KN
11J-U
HF£T
1
1/H/J*
'bb
2.0 (3H.D)
>.3 (110.0)
b(S30
5.5 (*OIO.*)
.I/ i/ 4}
.b/ 2/ 1
.0 It/ 2S
.» ll/ 2
.S 2/ J.t
.0 2/ .0
.7 3/
• 2
223
1.7b
11*. b
30. Ob
.000 < .47*)
115. S
1M*1)
4,4
2S.O
21 . 3U
• ••I
221.4
4.4*
.3*
1 .IS
7V2.U (30.0)
?b£. Q ( 30. U)
» 3 . 3 ( 1 1 U . 1> )
l.U/ i/ in
*•*.!/ J/ .8
3.*/ J/ .u
)t.*V ^/ J
.«/ 2/
*•?
.no
Ji.t
3b. 7
31.1
s!i
It.b
b.OI
207. S
ii.;,
3-0AC (*-4A )
314. «. Jjb. )
" l*.*l l*.S >
U.J3 iil.U )
!.->• l.J )
/ /
E-a
-------
TABLE E-8. TEST 113 EMISSIONS RESULTS
III FTP VCH1CLI EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED CM
PROJECT 11-1771-001
TEST NO. 111-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE NODEL 77 AMC PACER
ENBINE 1.1 KISS CIO) L-b
VEHICLE NO. II
OATC 7/11/7S
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 1
CVS ND. I
TEST MEICNT 11SS MG( 1900 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.1 KM( 1|.} HP)
GASOLINE EH-111
bill «M( 1111 MILIS)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bb PCT
lie RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
PLOMER OIF P MM. MIOUN. H10)
BLOBCR INLET ' HM. H;O(!N. »io)
8LONER I*LET TEMP. DEC. C(OC6. '}
OLOMEB DEVOLUTIONS
CVS FLUN SID. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/R1NCE/PPH
HC ICKCRO NETtR/RlNCE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPH
CO SCAC1D HEUR/R1N6E/PPH
COI SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/'Ct
COI ICF.CRO METER/RAHCE/FCT
NOI SAMPLE NETER/RANCE/PPN
NOI ic'CRo HEiER/RANce/pPH
DILUTION f ACTOR
ABS. HUMIDITY II.1 CN/KG
NOI HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
COLO TRANSIENT
771.7 (10.1)
11.1 (111.0)
CONCENTRATION PPN
CONCENTRATION PPH
NOI CONCENTRATION PPN
NC MASS GRANS
CO MASS GRANS
COI MASS CRAMS
NOI MASS C»AN3
KC MAHS/KN
CO GMAM3/KN
COI 6HAN8/NH
MOX CHAM3/KN
•UEL GONlUNrtiON
r CB L/IOOKN
•UN tine
SCCONOS
Pt«CtNT
Oft. C
tie e. c
arc, «ET (o«v)
scr. KCT (o«»)
VOL (9CN)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
1H.I!
Ib.tl
l.lb
IB.bl
101.0
1.11
11.11
!0b
3TABILI2EO
171.7 (10.1)
771.7 (10.1)
HOT TRANSIENT
>71.7 (10.1)
771.7 (10.1)
11.1 (110.B)
10.17
111.7
• bB
1.11
101
1.11
111.0
l.lb
11. IB
lblb.1
SOS
(.10
STABILIZED
771.7 (10.1)
771.7 (10.1)
11.1 (110.0)
b171b
17
1
71
71
.O/
.S/
.!/
• I/
I/
I/
]/
I/
B.71
10
11
1.11
.»»
111
0
10. 1/
1.
11.
1>1
1.
I/ 10
/U/ 1
/ I/ .11
/ >/ .01
/ I/ 17
/ «/ 1
71.1 (lbll.1)
.I/ I/
l.l/ll/
I.I/ I/
10. b/ I/
.]/ I/
10.17
110
1
.01
111
1
110.1
.V
(IbOB.
I/ 1
I/ 1
11. I/ I/
I,'/ I/
11.11
.B
,u
1
.SI
17.1
1.01
111.1
l.bO
11.»
IbS
b.Ol
1.000 ( .1?b)
tOb.I
11.11
HUMIDlTr Q/KG
TCNPCIATURC DEC C
11.1
11.1
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MC/KM 10.bt
CATALYST AV6. TCHP. DEC C
CATALYST MAI. TENP. DEC C
CARBON OIOIIOC C/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/IOOKN
HYDROCARBONS (THC) C/KH
CARBON MONO HOC C/HN
OIIOES OF NITROCtN C/KN
1-IAC
lll.k
11.10
.77
II.7b
Lit
(1-BAC)
( 10t.«)
( 11.01)
( .71)
( 11.11)
( 1.10)
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED ECR
PROJECT 11-1771.001
VEHICLE MODEL 77 AHC PICCR
(NtlNC 1.1 LCIIB CIO) L-b
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUM NUMBER
DATE
000«ETIR
CVS - SAC CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY. PCT
BAAOMCTCR. MM MC(1M «G)
RUR TIME, SECONDS
BLOMER OIF P MM. HIOUN. HIO)
BLOMER INLET p MM. HIO(IN. HID)
BLO»ER INLET TEMP. OEO. CIOEG. F)
ILOMER OEVOLJTIDIIS
cvs FLIM STO. cu. METRE
(SCF)
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/ PM
HC SCKCRO METER/RANGE/ PM
co SAMPLE HETER/RANCE/ PM
CO OCKCRD HCTER/RANCE/ PM
coi SAMPLE MCTER/RAMCE/ ct
coi BCKCRO MCTER/RANCE/ CT
NOI SAMPLE METER/RANCE/ PM
NOI BCOCRD METER/RANCC/ PN
HC CONCtNTRAIION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
COI CONCENTRATION RCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPH
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GR1MS
CDI MASS CRAMS
NOK MASS CRAMS
OFC, »ET 10«V)
SCF, "ft (OX)
VOL (SCH)
UN (MEASURED)
YEIT NUMCR.
BAROHCTt*,
HUMIDITY.
TEMPtWATURE,
PVMT
MM HG
6/KC
DEC C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, Me/UN
AVC, EIM. OIYGEN, PCT
CAT1LYST AVS. TEMP., DEC C
CATALYST MAI. TEW.. OE C
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/ UOIH
CARBON MONOI1DE.
OIIDES OF N1TROCEN
VEHICLE NO. 11
TRANSMISSION A9
SV« nt|
-------
TABLE t-9. TEST 113 EHISSIOHS RESULTS
TEST NO. lll-ll HUN l
VEHICLE NOOEL " *« PACER
tNftlNE 4.1 Ltift CIO) L-%
1RANIN1SI10N A|
GVN lib! HG( »32b LBS)
RELATIVE HUNIOITT bi *CT
DC9OICTION
BLO*E» OIF P NN. H20(IN. H20)
CO BCKBMD "ETER/RANGE/PFN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PP*
CO CONCENTRATION PP*
COf CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PP*
HC HIM fiRAMS
COt NASB GOANS
NOl NASS GRANS
MC GRANI/KN
COt GRAHS/MK
RUN TINC SECONDS
AVC. CXM. OIVGCN »E»CENT
SCP, MET 3" *St
1 2 .!<* 1.20 .13
11 . 35. S 125.0 Ji.l
. S 1.* 5. 3* 3. Ob
Ib . * bl.l Jl.lO JH.ll
17 1. 2 2001. lbS0.2 l^bb.j
1 .4* •.« li.JN O.M
.25 .5 .42 .&u
3 3.b )2«. 21^.1 32U.4
.11 l.« 3.17 l.S«
1 .«7 14.5 12.11 14, lb
(05 Ib7 5Qb Ibb
5.32 $.^7 5.5b b.12
$. 73 b.l? 5. Si b.1%
1. 000 ( .«J7) I. QUO ( ."77J
iftb.S JUfc.i
PROJECT 11-4771
VEHICLE NO. n
TRANSMISSION A3
CVtt 14fc? NC( 432
113-32
SET
1
t/ !/>•
7117HH( 44JZNILE3}
2-1-3
25. b / 71.0
7»l.» (2<.H)
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30,5)
43.3 (110.0)
112270
• .S/ 2/ •
1 .•/ 2/ 1
b .3/1W 25
.•/ 1 1/
7 .b/ >/ 1.4
.'/ 3/ .0
b .•/ I/ 11
.b/ >/
2*0
1 . J*
It .•
5) 2.'
b .57
.••t ( .113)
1.000 ( .MO)
210.0
21. b*
11 1-12
25. b
10.12
2!>2
-1)01
b LtS) GASOLINE EH-3*4
113-33
MFET
1
•/ l/7t / /
2-1-3
25. b / >t.O
7*1.4 ( «.!*.)
774.7 ( O.S)
774.7 ( O.S)
4). 3 ( 10.0)
b!5 5
115. 1 ( Ob7.0)
«.5/ 3 *S
1.3/ 3 13
53.1/11 20
2.3/11
40. 5/ 2 1.7
2.0/ 2 .0
31. 5/ * 11
.7/4
11
1. 7
30S.
5. b
25. I
MM 0
. ibb ( .Ibl)
l.OOO ( .477)
115.1
11 3-33
• .3
25. b
20,41
S.I 7
214. k
. >»
I.**
. )>
Ihj
7»)
2bJ
E-10
-------
TABU £-10. TEST 11M EMISSIONS RESULTS
11* flf VEHICLE EMISSIONS HCSUITS -
TEST NO. U»-U RUN
VEHICLE "OO'L 77 AMC »
ENSIWC *.* L(2SI ClU) L-
l-UwSMiSlON *J
BAG HfSUL'S
• LOi
8LO
CV9
«f» 01' * HN. HZOdN. HfU)
*tH INLET » NM. »*0
it.li
TEST
iCTU*t ROAO 1.0*0
M«( |foo LHS)
^.2 «•( IJ.3 HP)
HOI HUMIDITT COMMCCTION FACTOR
i *
HOT TRANSIENT STABILIZED
7«*
7»«
**
111
*7.
12.
^*.
1.
s*.
* .
11.
.
.1 <2«.S>
.1 (2«.S)
.1 U1B.O)
.1 (•klt.t)
I/ 2/ k>
/ If it
fill »IS
/ll> Ik
/ I/ .«l
/ I/ .Ok
/ I/ 12
' If 1
11. «7
Ik
.IS
10. »
•.21
kR.20
7. SO
.H
11.11
112. •
1.21
IS. 01
Ik7
k.0«
7»*.l (2*.S)
7*^.1 (2R.S)
•1.1 (110.0)
>k.7 (1701.1)
11. 7/ If 117
l.l/ I/ 11
2k. o/ ]/ kol
.If I/ 7
72. If If 1.11
«,7/ I/ ,0>
Sl.R/ 2/ S»
l.OX tf 1
'.»»
10S
1.2*
11. 0
•*kk
SI. 00
7. SI
.11
l.ll
101. I
1.11
11. k7
SOS
1.10
7*'.l (1R.S)
7»R.l (2R.»)
•1.1 (110. U)
111.0 («k27. )
11. •/ if 1
ik. law •
1 .*' 1 1/
SO.k/ ]/ .
!.»/ •/ .
11. I/ if
,\l 11 1
1«.»R
SI
!•«
li.i
• .01
t.ul
.kk
•.71
122. k
l.JI
I'.ll
Ik7
k.ll
.'01)
207.9
II. Ik
TOTAL full, SUL^UH MU/XN
AVG. FXH. OKrce" **CT
CATAIV9T ft^c. TC"P. OEfi C
C*T*t»ST HAS. TKM^. oec C
CARBON 010IIDC
FUCl. CONSUNRTION
MTO«OCA»(iO»» CTHC)
CARBON NONOlIOe
01IOCS Of MJTR06EN
C/KN
L/10QKH
C/KN
fi/HN
C/HN
.•1
I'.Ul
l.ik
11.1
1.*
'CM
teji
HUN N
DAfC
OCT.. C (OCG. ')
^Iylff, CCT
PROJECT H-»>71-001
VEHICLE NO. 11
TRAN9NIS3IOU A]
6VH |Rbf R6( 4]tk LBS)
111-U
9ET
I/11/7R
«»»«"< 4.i
I • I - 1
- UNxooi'ieo
TEST HEIGHT HIS >(( 1SOO IBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD *.l *•( 12.1 H^
CASOLINE EN-10
HFCT
t/31/'l
? " 1 - I
it,* I 71.0
t'.'
KLONEM INLET Tt"P. DEC. CCUEr,.
»LO«EI) RFVOLUMO'IS
CWS "LO" »'0. CU. ItTRrS(SCF)
COP »C«G40
NO! 3AHPLC
.
CO CIINC(.»T»«T10» »»»
CO? C')«Cr>!R«!Il>» "CT
•C •<>J9 G'ANS
CO •••Sft CXANS
cor "» c-'*«s
>OI ••ASS C«>»s
OFC. "ET (I)R»)
JCf. «ET (5«")
>UL OCX)
K« (HEASUREO)
R.l (J'.l)
l.a (JR.S)
IKSUk
tll.t <>•><. i)
11. Of If 11
M.S/ll/ »*5
l.h/ 3/ .Ob
70.}/ */ 70
l.O/ t/ 1
• t
tbO
!.*•
.!•( ( .A")
l.noo ( ."')
jll.k
>«.! (IR.S)
•1.1 (11U.O)
kll'T
llk.v (^IK.0)
l«.k/
-------
TEIT MO. 1 I»-M PUM 1
VEHICLE "OOEL 77 IMC PICE*
[1CINI l.t L(l«l CIO) L-k
TPINIMII1ION II
IV* 14kt «•( «ltk L*ll
IAROHETE* »o.lk MM ul(|4.1> IN NO)
RELATIVE HJJMJOITV kt PCT
• K REIULM
•1C NUMICP
DESCRIPTION
•LORtR DIP P MM. MffOUN. MtO)
ILONl* INLET P MM. HfOdN. HIO)
•L0>l» INLET TEMP. Ot«. C(OEC. "
•LONE" PPyOLUTIOMI
Cvl 'L0> |TO. Cu'. MET«E9(9CP)
»C I«"PLI MfTH/IAHGE/PPM
CO lAKPLt -fTf«'ll»Ct/PPM
CO IC'OPO "ftfl/IINCt/PP"
COI IAMPLC M(tf»/IANOE/PCT
cot iciievo METE«'IINCE/PCT
NOI ICMBPO MfrE*'*INOt'PPM
DILUTION PACTON
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COt CONCENTIITION PCT
NOI CONCENTPlTIO* PPM
HC Hill gHAMI
CO HAII C>AM|
COI HAI) C»'M|
NOI HAII QRAMI
CO CRAHI/KM
FUEL CONIUMPTION IV CB L'lnQRM
•UN TIHE IICONOI
CITIL»IT'IV«, UMP. oie. c
CITAL'IT MAI. TEMP. DEC. C
HCAIUREO DIITINCE •"
DPC. MET (ORV)
ICP, NET (0*v)
VOL (KM)
*• (MEA1UMOI
COMPOIITt K1ULTI
TEIT NUM»|« lll-tl
TEMPE>ATU»E Oft C till
TABLE E-ll. TEST ill EMISSIONS RESULTS
IK PTP VEHICLE EMIIIIONI •ftlH.TI • HIIH OIL COH1UMPTION
PPOJECt 11->II1-001
V MfCLt »0. 1
OTE n/k/7
I C ClPT NO.
C * NO.'
OIV luLI Tt-P. tl.
ill. HUMIOITV ii.«
i
COLO TRANSIENT
T7«.7 (10. 1)
77«.7 (10. 1)
•1.1 (110.0)
• 07kl
Ik.l (tkll.kl
•/ I/ 11
7* k/ ]/ 1 Ik
• I/ I/ ,07
I •/ t/ 1
1.11
110
lfc»4
1.10
".'
10.11
• 14. M
1101. 4
k.tl
1.71
• 0,71
11). •
1,01
lk.17
401
*. a*
i oec co».o oic f
CM/«C
t
STABILIZED
7kt.O 110.0)
7kt.O (10.0)
•1,1 (110,0)
k4!07
110. k (•kit. 01
•/ I/ 11
• k/ It .07
1 «/ t' I
11,1k
11
1010
.11
10.0
k.tS
11!. 01
1414. •
T.kk
l.Ot
II. 14
Ilk.!
l.il
11.11
Ik I
1.10
TCIT HEISMT 11
CASOL1NC E»-l««
ODOMETER 4IOt
NOK HUMIDITY COM
9
HOT TRANSIENT
7kt.O (10,0)
7kt,0 (10,0)
•1.1 (110.0)
• Okkl
7k, 1 ttklk.S)
!••' I/ 1*
.1' I/ 7
!«•/ I/ .07
1.1' t/ 1
4.71
ItO
• kk
l.tt
11.4
l.M
7k. 7
Ik41.
1.1
_,
11.1
141,
1 ,*
11.1
401
t.tl
II «•( 1100 L»«>
DICTION FACTO* l.Ot
•
ITAIILUtO
7kt. (10.0)
7kt. 110.0)
•1. (110.0)
4k71
110, (4kOI,4)
11 2/ 1]
11 }/ 77k
44 it .17
1 I/ .Ok
I.I/ I/ 1
14.11
,,
714
.11
11.7
i.ll
lit, 17
1411.
1,1
t.
11,1
111.
1.1
Ik)
1,47
1.7k k.lt
.•01 ( ,l«k)
1.000 ( ,«77)
tOk.7
11.11
.•17 ( .«0«>
1.000 ( .«)'!
I0k,»
11,•«
TOTAL FUEL SULFul M001
VEMICLI NO.
TfflNSMIISIO
ftVN l«kt •
TEIT NEICMT 1(0
ICTU4L "010 LOIO
C4IOLINE [M.M.
1100 III)
«»( 11,1 HP)
OITC
000MtTt*
1|n>l>ifuui nit. e (0(«. »)
,
•I>0MCTE«. MM M9(IH MC)
•u* M»e. ICCOMOI
•LOME* Olf f MM, MfOflM, HrO)
ILO«E« INLET • MM. »»0(Ili, MlO
•L0»« INLET TtM«. OtC. CIOIO.
• LOME! MVOLUTIONI
CVI 'L0» JTO. CU, MtT«t|(«c»
MC HM*Lr MrTEi'*iNeE/»»M
co ii"*Lt Mf Trn/»iNec/"M
co •CROMO Mf vf ii/«iNec/»*M
COI >'»»lf MfTEI/>INCE/«CT
COI IC'OO MFT(>/<1NCC/»CT
MC CONCENTNlTION »»*•
Co CONCf NTNITIQN P*M
COI CONCCNTIiTION >CT
NQI CONCCMT*|TION »»M
MC "HI <•>••
co »«n C»M<
COI "«ll O'IMI
NQI M«|0 i;«IM|
O'C. "IT !0«»1
ICP. MET (0»T)
»OL (ic-i
TI»(«(,
TOT4L »UfL |II
OEC C
PCT
CITIL"IT Mil' TE«»., OCC C
CIMON OIOUOE, C/>M
fUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100HM
MTOnOCItRONI, C/KM
CIMON MQnOirOE, «/••*
oiioci QP NITNOOE*. o-'p"
IIT
I
«/ k/71
ONM[
t - 1 • I
•I.I
717
110.1 !>•»>.(>
10.1' I 101
!.«/ I 1»
l.ll
.07
.«' 1
•!,•».»
• .I
t«.«
tl.lt
Ik0.<
11,11
M»tT
1
•/ k/71
• »71«M, Uk
I > 1 • I
tk.l / 7*,0
• O.k
7>0.t (»«.!•)
7kl
7<7.» (11.0)
717.• (11.0)
•1.1 (110,0)
k!7
I.I/ t/
•*.•/ t/
l.tt H
171
.07
l.kl
••.t
•*kf
•k.10
II>k.O
14.10
.•k7 ( ,lkl)
1.000 ( .477)
111.1
lk,»4
ll.-tl
7»e,t
i.•
tk.l
to.tt
.tl
t.lt
E-12
-------
TABLE E-12. TEST lit EMISSIONS RESULTS
PV" - 11* rtP VtuICLI IMMIIONI »flULTI • H10M Oil
PROJECT 11*M11*001
(It NO. II«-1I RUN I
CHICLE "OOfl 11 IMC PACE"
NIIN( '.I LlMI CIO) L-k
•ANIMIIJION II
mt *tt »•« iis>
•AROM(T(R H*. 1« MM MQ(I*.10 IM Mfi)
RELATIVE HIJMIOITY K PCT
111 REJULTI
IAO NUMRfR
OCSC-'IPTION
•LOXR on P »M. HIOMN. H>O>
ILOlXR INLET • UN. MIOdN. HfO)
•LOMCR INLET TE-P. ore. C(0d. ri
ILO«ER RtvOLI'HONS
cv» rLON STO. eg. »cTHt3(sCr)
HC iciotto MITE •/•ANOE/PPM
CO SAM»xj Mf TER'**N6(/PPM
CO' ICKJRO »fTE«/«ANO(/PPM
COt IA"Hf MrTtR/RANCI/PCT
COI ICXtg M.tt»/«ANOE/RCT
NOI |AM*|.r MfTFR/RANGE/PPM
NOI IC*|RO M|TT(R/RANIE/PPM
DILUTION FACTO*
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION »»*
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCCNTNAMON PPN
HC MAI| ORAMl
co NAII e'AMi
coi "'u O»A«I
NO! MAS! 0*AMI
HC C««"S/«»
CO 6BIM9/NH
COI S«««J/«»
HOI C»««S/««
'Uffl CONSUMPTION l. »«T (OK*)
VOl (ICHI
CO«»Ol|TI ItlULTI
TtlT
VCHIClC NO.
e»Tf •/ »/
»o c»r NO.
BTNO NO,
CVt NO.
11
>t
i
I
I
OH* lull '(**. 11.1 OtC Cl'l.O Ott »
III. HU»IOITV 10.1 |H/»C
T(IT MltOHT 111! «0( 1100 CRSI
ACTUAL ftOAO LOAD «.l K«( 11.1 HP)
CA90UHC |H>|»
OOOKCTM Ml* >»< ll'l
NOI HUNIOITt COMICTION FACTO' 1.00
1
COLO TRANSIENT
llk.k (t*.0)
•ill (110.0)
• Oltl
Ik.l tlkM.O)
!.»/ It It
"I./ I/ "ii
1,*' 1' .Dk
II. <' I' 11
.I/ I/ 1
•.11
111
lilt
l.tl
11.1
10.M
Hk.OI
1111.1
I. II
I
STAIILIHO
lkt.0 (10.0)
•>'.« (111,01
k*lkl
110.0 (•!•!.•)
lk.0' I/ Ik
.k' I/ !•
>.0/ M ,0k
11. tt I/ 11
,k/ It 1
1>.*0
1%
• tl
.11
10. •
t.tl
ltl.*0
1*11. 1
l.tl
1
HOT TRANSIENT
!•*.! (l*,t)
«»'.« (111.0)
• 0111
.»/ 1' •
»,!/ IS ,0k
II. 1' It tl
.I/ It 0
*.k»
HI
*•*
l.II
II. 1
1.01
• l.II
1101. •
l.t*
•
STAIILIICO
11*. 1 (10. t)
•1.* (111.0)
11. O/ It 1
!)/ I/
>.!/ 1' .0
II, I/ t/ 1)
.1' I/ 0
.••!•
1,
111
.10
11. k
t,!*
Itl.kl
1*00.1
1.10
l.t>
11.01
k.Ol
1.11
11.1*
10*. 0
1.11
in
I. II
HU>IOITf
S/>0
occ c
10.'
it.*
1,000 ( ,«lk)
ftk.l
11.11
TOTAL FUCL IULFU* HC/HH It.01
OTALTIT AVC. Tt»>. otC C
CATALTIT HAI, T«H». gel C
1,000 ( ,«lk)
IOk.0
11.*1
CAKON 010UOC «/«" 10*. 1
ruEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM !*.•!
MVOROCARIONS (THC) tl** 1.1*
0110(9 Or NITROGEN G/»M KIO
(•-IAG)
101,1)
1,011
<].»«)
l.ll)
IIT VEHICLE (NIIIIONI REIULTS • HIGH OIL CONSUMPTION
••OJECT 11->111*001
VIHICLC MOOCL 11 >"C >AC(>
(NIINI >,l Lilt) CIO) L»k
TC1T NUMHell
T(IT C»CH
•UN NUMIC*
OAK
OOOM(TII
MOMITtH
TEMPERATUM n(o. c (0(1. ')
IAROMETJR. »M HO UN HC)
RUN '!"«. ICCONOI
ILO*ER oir • MM. mod". HIO)
ILOIER INLET • MM. MIOUN. NIO>
ILO«ER INLET TEMP. 0(0. C(OES. r)
ILOnER IFvOLIlTIONJ
CVI FLO« JTO. CU. MfTNtdCfl
HC *AM*l( M.TER/HANGC/PPM
HC iCKGttD MCTER/RANOC/PPM
CO SA»»LE «ET(«/RANGE/PPM
CO ICKGVO MrTEff'RANGE/PPM
COI IAMPLE HfTE»/RANC(/PCT
COI IC«0*0 «ETE«'«AN«/PCT
NOI IC«0«« MfT(R/«AN»E/PPM
MC CONCfNTNATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MAII O*AMI
CO MAII 0«AMI
COI MAII CRAM)
NOI HAII |*AM|
ore, MET (DRV)
icr. HIT (oi'>
VOL (SCM)
KN (I
T[|T NUM>|r»,
IA>OM(T(*.
«U«10HT.
PVNT
M> HO
0(1 C
H«/«H
TOTAL ruEL »IILru«
AVI, EIH. OI-.EH, PCT
CATALTIT AVO'. TEMP., OCG C
CATALTIT MAI. TEMP., OEG C
CA»ION oioilne. »'""
FUEL CONSUMPTION, LJIOOKH
HTOIOCIIIONI, ./«»
CAMON HOiiO>IOE, •'«"
OIIOEI Or NITROGEN, G/NM
ve»KL( NO. 11
TIAN9HI3IION 11
U'.ll
I(T
1
It.O / 11.0
•".I
II*. k (I*. Ill
ll«k
111.* (11.0)
!•!.• (11. a)
•l.« (111.0)
111*11
10*. i (11*0.1)
10. O/ I/ 100
,*/ ]/ *
II. •/ I/ *lk
.I/ 1' 11
II. «' I/ l.t>
I.*/ 1^ •••
II. k/ |/ 11
,»' I' 1
•I
• 1*
1.10
11.*
11.11
lll.*l
1111.1
11.01
.111 ( .Ik')
1.000 ( . ••»)
to*. I
11.11
111-11
11*. k
10,0
tl.O
K.ll
1.0*
ik>,0
it. go
*.|0
i.i*
TtlT XIBHT 1111
ACTUAL *OAO LOAO
•A10LINE tM-l«»
»00 LIS)
>N( 11.1 HP)
11*.11
HrET
t
«/ I'll
«!••«•( I|1*NILEI)
1*1*1
II.I / 1>.0
II*.k (I*.It)
•kl
111.* (11.0)
100.1 (11.t)
•1.* (111.0)
11*.• (•01*.1)
*•.!/ I/ *•
H.I' It It
lt.*'ll' VOI
l.»'ll' •
••.I' t' l,*k
I.*/ I' .01
«0,k/ I/ 111
1.1' II I
II
111
l.*0
110. •
nloo
•00k.I
It.II
.110 ( .Ml)
1.000 ( ."II
ll.-ll
11*. k
10.0
II. 1
11.10
«.*•
1*1.1
10. k*
.Ik
l.l»
l.fl
E-13
-------
TABU E-13. TEST 121 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TCIT NO. 111-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE NOOEL 7i CHtv. NALIBU
ENCINE S.u L(10S C1D) v-l
•AS NUMRCR
DESCRIPTION
•LON(R OIF • NN. NIO(IN. HIO)
ILOMR INLET TCNF. OEC. C(OC«. ')
•LONER REVOLUTIONS
COl IAHRLC NETIR/RANC(/F>CT
NOl BCNGRO NETER/RANCE/MN
DILUTION FACTO*
NC CONCENTRATION ffm
CO CONCENTRATION FF>N
COl CONCENTRATION Fc I
NOl CONCENTRATION FFH
NC NAI9 CRANI
NOl NAIS CRAN$
HC CRAN9/KN
COl 6RAN9/MH
NOIt CRANl/KN
FUEL CONJUNCTION IT Cl L/100KH
•UN TINE 9ECONOI
OFC. «(T (ORV)
1CF, NET (OR»>
VUL OCN)
UN (N(AIUREO)
fCST NUNRER Ill-ll TOT
HUN10ITV S/48 11. b CAT
TEMPERATURE OE0 C 14.* CAT
PROJECT U-V771-001
VEHICLE NO. 11
OATC S/ll/71
9A6 CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 1
CVS NO. I
0*1 IULI TEN*. 14. • DEC C(7b.O OE6
AM. HUMIDITY 11. b GN/4C
1 1
COLO TRANSIENT 1 T At [1 1 ZE.O
7kI.O (30.0) 7bl. (30.0)
7bI.O (30.0) 7bl. (10.0)
•1.4 (111.0) 41. (110.0)
>b.O (lb!4.S) 110. (4bOi.l)
Sk.S/ I/ 140
.I/ I/
74. o/ I/ 1.1
4. II M .0
,4/ il 1
1.41
ISO
1140
lll.bl
1 .14
10. bS
lll.b
SOS
2.15
IIS
S.74
l.OOfl
14 0 ll/ 11
4 4 13/ »
SI 1 ]/ .44
4 I 3/ .Ok
4 II 1
1
.1
11.
. I
I. 1
tiot.o
.OS
• bb
2.50
4S1
b.07
( .401)
( .477)
10k. 1
11.11
1 40 FUEL CC
TC3T "EIGHT
ACTUAL ROAD
6ASOLINE EM
F)
NOl NUNIOITV
1
HOT T»«NtlE»t
7bi. (10.0)
7b». (10.0)
41. (110.0)
Dbll
7b. (Ibll.b
S7 HI 117
1 ll/ I
bb I/ 1.11
4 I/ .1)7
1 I/ 1
1.14
14
114
1.1!
11. S
.b
10. «
s.o
.1
ll.'k
IDb
2.70
341
474
.4
1.0
OIOIIDE G/KN
1SII «G( 1SOO LI9)
LOAD 1.0 K«( 10.7 M«)
CORRECT ION FACTOR 1.03
«
tlAtlLlltD
7 I. (10.0)
7 i. (10.0)
9. (110.0)
4141
> 1 0. (4S41.1)
1 .' il Ib
1 . II 14
. ll/ 7
. ll/ 1
S . I/ .41
I/ .07
«. I/ II
I/ 1
4.41
3
S
.Ifc
Il.l
iisi.
.0
.1
111.
.4
Ibb
2.75
441
b.07
II ( .411)
00 ( .471)
IOb.1
ll.lt
1-BAC (,-,
117.1 ( m
.10 (
«.°b ( ,.
.S)
• 4)
*4)
4b)
• 7)
VIHICLC CH1SIIONI K3ULTI - U»«OOIH[0
MOJICT 11-4771-Otl
VIH1CK 100CI 71 CHCV. "iillO
KN«!Ne s.u l(10S CIO) v-l
Till HU«lt«
TUT CTCtt
MUM 4UMICII
OAlt
OOOHCTCI*
<*fTCK/NANCC/'CT
«IUR/*>N6C/^CT
•ElATIVE HUMlOlTT< PCT
•UN \l*l, SCCOMOS
BCOMCM OIF P MM. M*0(IM. HJO)
«KOt» NUNBC*.
MUMlOIT*/
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR.
PVNT
NN NC
tl't
an c
CATAL») A»Q. TENF., Otc C
CATALT8T NAK. TENF.r DIG C
CARION 010'lOt, C/>N
FUEL CON3UNRT10H, l./luo»
NVOROCAHIONS, ^/NN
TMT NIICHT 1SII KC( 1SOO LAS)
1
TRAMIMI9IION Al
BVN 1041 KC( 4441 LSI)
lil-li
SET
1
S/ll/71
17IIKN( 1107FIILCS)
I - 1 - 1
11.4 / 7S.O
741.4 (14.11)
1147
7kI.O (10.0)
iki.a do.o)
13.3 (110.0)
111114
Ill.l (74.§/ I/ .07
SI. II I/ SI
.•/ I/ 1
4
IOR
1.41
SI. 4
t. 11
Ik. 11
S41S.b
11.40
.114 ( .110)
I.OOR ( .'7k)
itfl.l
I1.S4
tll-ll
741.4
4.7
11.4
II. 14
2.05
«44
S7b
IS1.S
10.11
.OS
l.II
.4S
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.0 KN( 10
CAIOLINt EN-144
111-11
HFET
j
S/11/7R
1IO|KN( 11IONILCI)
I - 1 - 1
4S.O
741.4 (J4.I1)
'kk
7bI.O (10.0)
7VI.O (10.0)
41.1 (110.0)
b!4lb
lit. I COkl.k)
It. II I/ II
14. 4/ I/ IS
>k.k/ll/ 7
l.b/13/
41. 4/ I/ 1.7
I.I/ I/ .0
7b.)/ I/ 7
.4/ I/ 1
«
71
l.bb
7S.1
.b*
4.47
1S04.1
IS.bl
.171 ( .IbS)
1.000 ( .47b)
lit. I
Ik. Ik
111-13
741.4
l.l
14.4
14.01
1.50
SIS
SR»
IIS. 4
4.1b
.04
.SI
.4b
E-l<4
-------
TAW£ E-». TEST 121 EHISStO*S RESULTS
- 111 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS REIULTI - RICH HIT 101.1
KIT MO. Ul-ll Hull I
VEHICLE MODEL )l CHEV. HALIBU
IHCIW t.O LO01 CIO) »-•
TRANINISS10N «1
«V< I04> «C{ 444| IBS)
•AROHCTER '11.10 HN HC(t«.|7 IN HC)
RELATIVE HUNIOITY II PCT
• •I (E3UI.fl
BAC HUMUR
DESCRIPTION
SLONER OIF P NX. HIOdN. MJO)
BLOHER INLET P NX. HJO(1N. H|0)
•LONER INLET If"'. 010. C(DE6. ')
M.ONED REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLON iTg. cu. HETREI(SCF)
HC BCICRO HETER/RANCf/ppH
CR SAHPLE METER/RAHCE/PPH
co BCF.CRD HETER/RANGE/PPN
COt SAHPLE NETER/RAHCE/PCT
CO! IC'CRO NETER/RANGC/PCT
NOI BCKORO NETER/RANCE/PPH
OILUTION FACTO*
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
CO} CONCENTRATION 'CT
NO! CONCENTRATION PPN
HC HASS CRAMS
CO NAM CRAMS
COI MASS CRAMS
*)OI "ASS CRAHS
HC ORANI/KN
CO 6RANS/NN
COI CRANS/KN
NOI CRAHS/IN
FUEL CONSUMPTION M CB L/IOQNN
RUN TINE SECONOI
AVC. EIH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST «»«. TENP. OEC. C
CATALtlT "A,. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KH
DFC, NET (OUT)
scr. NET (o«r)
• 01. (ICH)
UN (NEAIUIIEO)
CON»OIITE RESULTS
TEIT NUNIED 111-11
•ANONETER IN H6 >ll.l '
HUMIDITY 6'KQ ' 4.4
TEHMRATME OEe C II.»
PROJECT 11-477I-*BI
VEHICLE NO. It
DATE 1/17/7S
SAC CART MO. 1
OYHO NO. 1
CVS NO. t
DRY BULB IENP.
AB9. HUMIDITY
COLO TRAN9IENT
11.4 OEC C(7I.O DEB F)
4.4 CN/««
STABILIZED
TEIT «EI«Nf !(•• >•( !»•» LM)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD I.D >•< 10.? NT)
CA10LINC IN.lt>
OOONItER ill! «H( llll NILEI)
NOI HUNIOITV CORUfCTlON FACTOR
7kt.B (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
41.4 (111.0)
40S41
71. k (lkkS.7)
It It I/ tit
1 I/ I/ 11
It It 1
71 t/ I/ 1.14
t •/ I/ .04
It V It Ik
1 O/ It 1
1.11
104
1114
1.11
11.0
4.10
114.74
1710.1
l.4t
1.17
11.74
I4S.7
• It
It. Ik
101
1.35
104
411
1.74
.404
1.000
7ki.
?kt.
11.
IK.
10 t
1 »
1
I« •
1 •
11 0
4
(10.0)
(10.0)
(111.0)
4174
(4117. k)
I/ 101
I/ Ik
I/ 7
]/ .••
It .Ok
' It 11
' I/ 1
11.14
1
1
( .400)
( .411)
101.7
11. <•
40
1114
.11
11. 1
k.k7
>O.J1
• 41.4
1.40
1.04
17.4k
lll.k
.41
11. kl
• kl
0.«
41k
4% 7
k.ll
HOT TRANSIENT
7bt.O (10.0)
lkl.0 (10.0)
•1. (110.0)
0140
71. (itll. )
4k.4 i/
1>. It
17. I/ •
It
kl. !/ I.
4. •/ .
Ik. It I
1. I/
O.kl
• 4
Ilk
.04
I.k
i.kl
74.11
1114.4
I.IB
.kl
11.01
Ikl.4
.ki
It.Ik
101
1.15
171
ITAIILIUO
?kl.O (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
II.1 111.!)
k4 41
111.I 114.t)
41. 4i
11.
40.
44!
4 . /
11.
1.
11. k
II
4k<
t
.Ik
.117
14
• 0
411
.74
II.k
1.40
1J4.II
lllk.4
1.01
.4k
. TEW. OtC C
1O.11
1.10
C»«»0» OIOI1M C/KN
FUCL CON*UN*TION L/100«»
HYORKAMON1 (THC) C/KH
CARftOM NONO1IOE C/NN
OIIOCS OP NITROCEN G/«N
PVN - 111 S«T
VEHICLE ENI99IONI RI1ULT1 - RICH KIT IDLE
PROJECT U-»»l-»01
VEHICLE NOOCL 71 CHEV. HAL1BU
ENCINE 1.0 L(10I CIO) V-l
TEST NUNBEII
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
CVI - BAG CART - DYNANONETE*
rCHPERATURE OEC. C (OtC. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCI
IARONETER. NN HOC IN HC)
•UN TINC. SECONDS
•LONER DIP P NN. H20UN. HEO)
ILONER INLET P NN. «?0(IN, HJO)
•LONER IHLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F
ILONER REVOLUTION!
CVS FLON 910. CU. HETRES(SCF)
MC SAXPLi; HCTEP^RAH6E/PPH
HC OCKCRO METER/RANCE/PFM
co (AMPLE NETEH/RANCE/PPH
CO »C«MO HJTER/RANCE/PPM
COf SAMPLE METER/RAHCE/PCT
coi BC>CRD METER/RANSE/PCT
NOI IAHPLE METER/RANCE/PPH
NOI SCKCRO HETER/RANBE/PPM
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
N0> CONCENTRATION PPN
HC Nils CRAMS
CO MASB CRAMS
COt NISI (RAMS
NOI MASS CRAMS
OFC. PCT <0«Y)
SCP. NET (ORV1
VDl (SCN)
KM (NeASUREO)
TEIT NUM(ER>
BAROMETER)
MUMIOITVt
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUCL SULFUR.
PVMT
MN HC
DEC C
MG^KN
CATALTSf "«. TEMP., DEC C
CATALTIf MAX. TEMP., OEC C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KN
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L'lOOK
HYOROCARtONS. C/KN
CARBON NONOIIDE. G/««
0110ES OF NITROCEN, G/RN
VEHICLE NO. II
fHANSNlllION Al
CY« I0«> >C( "'I
SET
«/U/71
tl»l«M( 1MINILI9)
1-1-1
J'.t / H.O
II. k
7)1.1 (II. S7)
JH.a cio.o)
IH.O (lt.0)
'J.» (Itl.O)
lltltl
107.1 (7111. »
77. If I/ 7B
It.W I/ It
17. */ I/ 40
.!/ I/
•!.>/ I/ 1.1
«.k/ I/ .0
«•.«/ I/ «
.!>
I. HI ( ."«)
IB7.I
11.41
111-fl
711.1
11.0
kM
111.7
11. SI
TEST NEICMT KBB >•( 1IBO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 1.0 «•( 1B.> HP)
GASOLINE |H-J<»
lil-tl
HPEI
1
t/17/71
Illl«»( IKtMILEI)
1-1-1
11. k
711.1 (11.17)
7kl
7ki (10.0)
7k! (10.0)
41 (111.0)
Ikll
111 (4011.I)
Ik. It Ik
It. It
71. ll/ 1
t. ll/
41. It 1.
I. It .
• 4. It
147
1.7>
• 1.7
1.70
14. »
1714.4
11.44
.IkR ( .•»)
UORO ( .471)
111.4
It. Ik
Itl-il
711.1
11.0
•4.4
10.11
l.U
t!7
kil
117.4
4.M
1.41
1.11
E-15
-------
TABU E-15. TEST 121 EfllSSIOHS RESULTS
in 't» «EHICLI ENIISION* ncsuiTs - HICK ten itx.t
PROJECT ii-<77i.goi
TEST HO. 111-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE NOOEL >• CHEV. MALISU
EMCINC t.o L(IOS CIO) v*«
TRAH9N199ION Al
BVH 1010 «C( oil LSS)
BABONfTER >ll.kl HH HC(24.0I IN HC)
RELATIVE HUNIOITT *• PCT
•AS RESULTS
• AC NUNMR
DESCRIPTION
•LONER DIP P NH. H20(IN. HIO)
•LOMER INLET P HH. H20(IN. H|0)
•LOHCR INLET TEHP. DEC. C(OEC. P)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS PLOH 910. CU. HETRE9I9CP)
HC
CO
9AH
COt 9ANRLE NET£R/«ANC£/PCT
COI ICKCIO NETER/RANCE/PCT
NO! 9ANPLE NETER/RANGC/P'N
HOI SCIICRO METEM/«AHCC/"I*
01LUT10D PACTOM
1C COKCNKATION "*
CO CONCOTIIATION •'"
COI CONCENTIATION PCI
HOI CONCENTRATION PPM
MC NAII CNAHI
CO DAI9 CDANI
COI *A9« CAAN9
HC QNANS/NH
CO CMAN9/RH
•UN I1HC 9fCONOI
AVO. EIH. 01TCEN PERCENT
CATALT9T AVC. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALV9T NA1. TENP. OCC. C
HEA9UIED OI9TAHCE »H
OPC. «€T (0»T)
9CP, ««T <0«»)
»0l (9CH)
UN (HCAIUNfO)
HPOtlTt MCSVH.TS
TEII HUMlt* 111-11
MUH1DITV G/KC ^.i
TCHPt'ATUHE DEC C J».«
V ICLE NO. II
D E S/ll/71
B CART NO. 1
0 0 HO. 1
C NO. I
ORT 8ULS TEHP. 2*.» OEC C(7b.O OEC P)
ASS. HUNIOITV *.S CN/KC
TEST -EICHT llll KCC HOD LH)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 1.0 NM( 10.7 Hi
CASOL1NC EH-1M
OOOHCTER IJOJ «H( llbl HILCS)
NOI HUNIOITT CORRECTION FACTOR .«k
1
CXO TRANSIENT
71b.b (H.O)
71b.b (14.0)
*!.* (111.0)
*0>01
I.'/ I/ 1*
.I/ )/ S
».!/ I/ .07
]!«*/ {/ 11
.S/ It 1
«.»7
lib
lbS7
1.13
11.7
10.1*
!!S.«1
1717.
«.S
1.7
'O.b
Kb.
. I
K.b
SOS
1.75
1<»
»1*
S. 7«
.«04
1.000
Avc. EIH. 01VCCN PCT
CATALT9T AVC. TCHP. OEC C
1
STABILIZED
7*1.1 (H. S)
7*1.1 (11. «)
*1.1 (110.0)
b*'4*
!.»/ t/ D
. / 3'
SO. / I/ .S
*. / I/ .0
il. /I/ 1
. / >'
11.17
• •
111S
.•1
ie.*
>.s
Ikl.l
1110.
*.»
1.0
«'.*
11*.
.*0
1S.*0
• bb
1. J5
*11
"•
b.l'
( .141)
( .HI)
IOS.1
11.11
,11 CAABON
1
HOT TRANSIENT
7*1.1 (»«.. S)
7*1.1 ctR.il
•*.* (111.0)
• OS*1
75.1 (Jbkl.')
.?/ 3/ S
b7.1/ I/ 1.11
S.I/ ]/ .OS
,7/ It 1
1U.31
• 0
715
1.1*
IS. 3
l.SO
bl.04
IS'l.S
LSI
.bl
li.OO
(71.1
.bl
11. SI
SOS
1.75
Ib*
*7C
S.7b
.111 (
1.000 C
OIOI1DE C/KN
.SO PUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KN
Ib7 HVDROCARBONS (THC) C/KN
*7S CARBON HnMOIlnv C/KN
»
STABILIIEO
7*1. C81.S)
7*1. («1.S)
*3. (111.0)
4S*I
1J1. (»SI1. )
10. S 2/ 4
11. 1 11
3
SI. 3 .1
S. 1 .0
13. i \
. 2
11. i
7
• 7
.9
11.
S. 0
118. 1
1414 S
1. 0
. \
21. 7
Hi S
. 0
1*. I
Ib
1.4
*l
*7
b.l
.110)
.111)
JOS.l
11.40
1-BAC (
214.1
I'.bb
1.U4
IS.41
.S*
l.Ofc)
2*.21)
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RC3ULTS - *1CH tUST
MQJCCT U-V771-00}
CNCIMf S.g UJ01 CIO) V-t
rtsT MUHteii
TCI' CVCLC
•UN NUMtCM
OATK
OOQMCTCft
Tt^CNATUM OC6. C (OtC. ')
IN(.CT » MN. HJQCN.
co SAMPLE tcTcii/*AMce/»»M
CO* BCK6MO MCTCO/.l*N6t/»CT
HC CONCCNTMtTION PP«t
CO CONCtNTsUTIo* PPN
co* coNceNTntTioM PCT
NOI COMCCNTRAT10N PPM,
CO HAH CHIMB
NOl MASS 6*9
ore, e / n
.i/ i/
t .»/ i/ i.»
.!/ I/ .Oh
% .»/ */ S>
.!/ t/ 1
I *.i
f .71
1*1-9*
71*.*
ISt.S
11, S*
. 10
'.b*
TEST HcifiHT isii KC( isoo LIS>
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.0 KM( 10.7 MP
CASOLINC CN*1*1
f/t«/7|
2*11K*'( 134HM
* - 1 - 1
2S.O X 77.0
«*. >
71».4 (2*.04)
.4/1
.' / 1
.1 I /
.0 / 1.7
.7 / .0
.4/1
2/
I.M
*S.**
Iktl.*
17.17
.•iS ( .t
1.000 ( .«
1M.7
tk.2h
If 1-»1
71S.4
4.1
2S.O
14. 4S
1.10
Sib
£-16
-------
TEBT MO. 111*11 NUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL >i CHIV. MALIIU
INOIM 1.0 L(IO< CIO) V.I
TRANSMISSION AI
CVM 1010 «JC XII LCS)
BAROMETER MI.M *N HC(24.M IN «fi)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY kl PCT
IA6 RESULTS
• AO HUHKI
DESCRIPTION
BLORER OIF P HH. HIOUN. H»0>
BLONER INLET P MM. HIOdN. HIO)
BLONER INLET TEMP. OC6. C(OCC. F)
•(.Out! REVOLUTIONS
c«i 'ton STO. cu. NETREStscf)
NC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC SOCRO METER/RANGE/PPN
co SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKaR.0 METCR/RAHCC/PRN
101 SAMPLE NETER/RANCE/PCT
coi OCKCRO METER/RANCE/PCT
KOI SAMPLE METP.R/RANOE/PPM
HOI BCKCRO METER/R.ANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR '
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
HC NAJI CRAMS
CO NAIS CRAMI
COI NISI CRAMS
«0« «A»B CRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
COI CRAMS/KM
NOI CRANS/HN
FUEL CONIUNPT10N AT CB L/IOOKM
•UN TtxC SECONDS
«V8. EIN. 01YCEN PERCENT
CATALTIT AVO. TENP. DEC. c
CtTALttT «*«. tt«f. OtS. C
NCtlUMCD DISTANCE KN
O'C, NET CO**)
SC', NET (D»Y)
VOl (SCH)
KM (NE<9U»EO)
CONPOIITC DESULTS
TEST KUNIE* Ill-It
KARONETEP. NN MS TVI.7
HUNID1TT G/N8 U.I
TCNPCKATUP.I 0(« C il.l
TABLE E-16. TEST 122 EMISSIONS RESULTS
111 FTP VEHICLE EMIIIIONI IEIUI.fl . UNI
PROJECT ll'»71-001
VEHICLE NO.
OATE k/JI/7
OTNO NO,
CVS NO.
0«Y «ULS TEMP. ».I DEC Cdl.D DtC f)
AIS. HUNIDITT M.I CM/KG
TEST NEKHT Kit >«( 1100 Lit)
ACTUAL «OAO LOAO 1.0 «.( 10.) HP)
CAIOLINE £H-1»1
NOI HUHIOITT COftUCCTlON P4CTOH
OLD TRANSIENT
7«°J (I»!j>
•I.' (111.0)
'k.l (1701.0)
I.O/ 3/ 10
.!/ 3/ I
'I.I/ )/ 1.30
!.•/ I/ .0*
II. }/ I/ IB
.'/ I/ 1
• .II
STI
'•*.
'••.
111.
Il.l
• .0
u!s
3*0
11.3
1.0
BILIZED
(I'.S)
(!•.!)
(110. 0)
(•kl^.l)
11 11
I/ •
3/ ,RO
I/ .OS
I/ 1
HOT TRANSIENT STABILIZED
'••.3 (!•.§> 7»«.3 (I«.S)
•l.« (111.0) •!.! (110.0)
H.7/ I/ I <.k/ I/ t
7. I/ I/ k.l/ I/
.l/ll/ l.*/13/
kl.k/ 3/ I.I »•.»/ )/ .1
'.I/ I/ .0 ».l/ I/ .0
!.•/ I/ 1 l.l/ •/
10. kl It.kl
I.Ik
17.7
*.'k
10.10
110.k
.10
I'.'k
»0»
.11
I.BB
• .07
.OS
.SO
331.7
.kk
I.Ik
• Ik
.•II (
I.BBO
107.k
11.17
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MC/KM I*.7*
AVG. EIH. OIY6EN PCT 1.11
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC C 371
CATALYST MAI. TEMP. DCC C • '»
CkRtON DloilOE
FUEL CONSUMPTI
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON HOHOIIOE
OI1DES OP NITROGEN
.SI
II. ••
Ikll.t
».OI
.IS
l.SO
III.*
.71
11. kl
tot
1. 01
371
• ?•
S.kl
• •II
1.000
E C/KM
ION L/100NI
[THO C/KH
>E S/«N
IOGEN E/KN
• I*
!.•!
ll*b.t
• .It
,„,
.31
30k. 1
.70
13.11
Ik 7
!•!•
• 11
• 7*
k.lS
( .•!!)
t .<77)
107.)
11. B»
1-IAG
31S.7
' 11.11
.it
S.*k
.'0
)nt.)
11. Sk
t.'l
.71
»T VEHICU EM19IION3 (CSUITS • UNNOOIPIEO
PNOJECT ll-»7»l-ool
VEHICLE NOOEL >• CHEV. NALIB
fMBlNE I.O L(10> CIO) V.I
TEIT NUHBEP
TEST CTCLt
•UN NUHBE*
DATE
OOQMETC*
ANONETEP.
1l»'!»»IU»t DEC. C (DEE. ')
RELATIVE HUHIOITV, PCT
BAPONEfEP.. NN H«( IN HC)
PUN TIHE, SECONDI
ILONEH oi' P XH. xiodN. HIO)
BLOKE* INLET P HH. HIOdN. HIO)
«LO«[« INLET ICHP. DEC. CtOCB. F)
«LO«C« REVOLUTIONS
CVS >LON STO. CU. NEIRES(SCP)
HC SAMPLE NETER/RANCE/PPH
HC BCKCRD HCIIN/AANCE/PPH
CO SAMPLE NCTER/IANCE/PPH
CO BCNORO METER/RANCe/PPN
COI SAHPLE NETER/RANtE/PCT
COI BCK6RO NETER/RANCE/PCT
NOV SAMPLE "ETER/RANflE/PPN
NOI ICK6RO NETER/RANCE/PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
HC *1» S"««!
CO NAS9 6RAHS
roi NAIS CRAMS
NOI NABS CRAMS
OfC, «T (0«T)
SCP. »ET (OR»)
VOL (SCM)
«M (MEASURED)
TEST NUNBER.
BARONETER.
MUMlQITf.
T(M»|RATURE.
TOTAL FUtL SULFUR,
PVHT
MM HC
.C/KC
DEC C
HC/KM
AYG. EIH. OIYCCN,
CATALYST AVC. TEW
PCT
DEC C
DEC C
CARBON DIOIIDE, G/HM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/IOOHN
HYDROCARBONS, C/IN
CARI.ON NONOIIDE, G/«M
OIIDES OF NITROGEN, C/KH
VEHICLE NO. II
TDANIHIStlON A3
CVII IO<0 ««( »••! Lit)
HIM!
SET
1
k/II/71
• M»»M( 307NMUES)
1-1-1
Ik. 7 / 10.0
50.1
>'«.» (I1.ll)
1317
7»».l (I'.J)
7»^.l (H.«)
•3.3 (110.0)
111117
111.* O»k7.l)
17. 7/ >/ II
7,«/ II I
71.I/1I/ Ikl
•.!/ »/ •>
71. I/ 3/ 1.1*
I.*/ I/ .Ok
11. I/ I/ 41
I.O/ I/ I
11
so.o
1.10
11.11
•3k«.B
10. k<
.!•! ( .SID
1.000 ( .»77)
111. I
11.13
Ui-II
7»».l
11.)
It). 7
II. M
• •n
BS«
!••,<
10.10
.Ok
• ts
.•k
TEST NEICHT isn «c(
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD S.O
tlSOLIHt (H.)«>
111-11
WIT
I
k/II/71
SO*3KM< 31I1MILEI)
1-1-1
• 7.S
'kl
>".» (K.I)
>••.! (I*.S)
•!.• (111.0)
kill!
117.1 (•117.1)
IB.*/ I/ 11
k.l/ I/ k
.O/ll/ !•
.O/ll/ 1
.•/ I/ 1.7k
.•/ I/ .Ob
.I/ I/ I*
.I/ I/ I
k
II
1.71
Il.l
.37
{.•7
11.11
.Ikl ( .Ikl)
1.0«0 ( ,*7f)
11'.I
Ik.17
III-ll
lo'.k
Ik.'
IB.k*
.01
.11
1.1*
E-17
-------
T«BLE E-17. TEST 122 EMISSIONS RESULTS
»•• - IK »T» VEHICLE E»l«iIO«l ICIULTS - IS
PROJECT 11-4771-101
TC>1 NO. 111-21 HUN
VCH1CLC HuuCt, '• CHEV.
714.lt MM MC(.*^.1U IN
HUH1DUT M 'CT
MOl SAM
["LET It"'. OEC. C(0(t
en*
•ov
CO
N01 **»9 6**«
»«C C«*"3/«N
CO C**HS/«H
MOV {.JUMfl/MM
0V CB L/100HM
seco*o9
ME41UHED OISTiMCI
QfC, "£T (0«T)
VEHICLE »0.
10.
11
BAG CAMT
OTNO NO.
CVS NO.
OUT 8ULB TEMP.
ACS. HUMIDITY
COCO tRA*31E»t
ton mtrinE 11
TEST -EIGHT 111! KB< HOD Lift)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.0 KN< 10.> Mt»)
CASOLINf £«-)»»>
ODOMETER SUB KM( 3bli MILES)
e OEC C(72.0 OEC f)
GM/KC
KOI HIMIOITV com
HOT TRANSIENT
ION FACTOR ,«7
*
STABILIZED
7k!.o (30.0)
7kl.o (30. O)
43.3 (110.0)
40kk>
7k. 0 Ilkll.l)
O.O/ 4/ 0
l.O/ 3/ 13
4. 1/ I/ .Ok
41. 11 11 41
I.I/ I/ 1
l.!0
7kl.O (10.0)
7ki.O (10.0)
43.1 (110.0)
k4k37
130.1 (4141.4)
4 4/ I/ 10
14 3/11/ 14
4 Q/ I/ .Ok
11 3/ !/ It
1 O/ I/ 1
11.47
7kI.O (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
'1.1 (110.0)
40k71
43. */ !/ 44
l.fc/ !/ 4
2.7/11/ 1
4.k/ 3/ .07
H.7/ I/ Ik
I. I/ !/ 1
10.01
7kl. (10.0)
7kl. (10.0)
41. (110.0)
4170
17.1 I/ 1
1.1 !/
7.1/11/
4.4/ I/ .0
IS. I/ I/ 1
I. It It
11.11
rcir NUMBED
ut't\
MN Nd 794.1
6/HC *.*
oec c tl.i
410
Ik44
1.31
41. fc
41.41
141.41
1114.7
1.17
7. 34
11.03
3lt.O
1.01
lk.lt
101
l.tl
131
114
i.ll
toMt 'UEL SUtFUR Mfi/K
• VS. €»N. OITCEN PCT
11
31
.40
14.4
.11
1.14
1131.4
1.14
.13
.•k
141.1
.44
14. kl
Ik
I.k
It
kl
k.i
.410 ( .144)
1.000 ( .471)
10k. 0
11.04
M 31.14
1.14
Ik
Ilk
1.14
14.7
1.71
IS. 3!
1)11.
4.4
.k
4.1
14k.
. |
13.0
lot
1.43
4kk
k3k
1.74
.41! (
1.000 (
CARftOM DIOI10E C/KH
FUEL CO»SU"»TION L/100KK
NVOROCARIONS ITHC) E/IN
CARION MONOXIDE G/BN
OKIO€8 or NITROGEN 6/KN
10
31
.11
14.7
.71
1.11
14«k.k
1.41
.11
.11
111.1
.4k
ll.lk
Ik7
1.41
17k
kll
k.14,
.411)
.474)
101.4
11.41
1-«AC
3!4.0
14.13
1.71
fc.14
.41
(»-»A6)
( Jl*.^)
( I*.!*)
( 1.7H)
( •».•»
( .«*)
VEHICLE E(*[SSIOMS RESULTS - ICNITIOM MISFIRE
PROJECT U-*'71*001
VEHICLE HIIOEL 'i cnt*. N
ENCIMF »i.o LIIOS ciO) v-i
tfSI NUHdCK
TEST CYCLE
•OH NUMBCtt
DATE
lEH»»tl»*fU«)( DEC. C (U!C.
flLOMCf) I"LET TEMt*. QIC. C(0€«.
•i.O»C» REVOLUTIONS
CVI >L-1« 1TO. CD.
CUJ iC-COO
*»M
NETE*/«iM6E/.«CT
cni co^cf m(»* r ION
HC "4B3 CHANS
H*flS CHAN}
Oft, •(' (DMT)
SC^. "€1 (DRV)
VUL ISC")
•in (MEASURED)
TeHPEHATUME,
TOTAL -*UfL SULFUR*
•»«. t*H. OITGCN,
CARftOM MOUUE.
fUCL COMSUMPTION.
OIIDES Of "ItHUtti,
MM MS
OEC C
,< OEC c
, , OEC C
L/1QONM
, G/HM
VEHICLE NO.
TRANSMISSION A]
Hi'ti
SET
t
7/1?/?•
$l*7««( ItJlMILES)
* * I - 1
tl.l / Tl.O
'1^.1 (f<.10>
11*7
7fc»».0 (ID.01
?.>*.0 OO.O)
*1.3 (UO.O)
llMi'
»0«.1 (Jl^fc.Ol
5k.I/ >/ »7
>.»/ */ »
t».«/II/
l.v/ll/
li.O/ ?>
i.*i
}4I
.Ok
bO.
b.O*
^1.1*
11P0.4
«?.]k
.••(> ( .lit)
i.noo ( .«?B)
f04.4>
41.70
lii-H
73*1.1
<*!•
13. »7
Hi
7«k
JS3.S
11.1»
.IB
«.*»
1.A1
TEST WEIOHT ISRB NG{ JSOO L8S)
ACTUAL R04Q LOAD •»& KM( 10.7 HP)
CASOLIME Ct-11*
7/7B
IhShMILES)
^ - i - i
*«.
71^.
'h«.
7«>#.
•1.
U'.IO)
7bf
OO.O)
0.0)
lli.O)
^•
Zk
i.^
.0
*17
I*
1.*
'*.
I. f
1*. •
}R7t.O
11.»1
.BSk ( -ll»>
1.000 ( .<7I>)
11*.•
I**-*!
»1«.I
• .»
2«.(>
II .RO
.•17
731
773
.0*1
2.00
1.11
E-18
-------
T£ST wO. ill<•> Jl BUN
VfHIClC lOOtl. *• CMEV. H
IMG INF t.O L(ini CIO) V-»
• 46 *£>ULTS
BAC HUH«
M«.
H?O)
.
•tO»CR 1 1*1 If UM)». DEf,. CfDtG. f)
BLO*e» REVOLUTIONS
CVS H.UW »TO. CU. *€ms
HC 3»NPL£ HErER/HUNCE/MM
*C BC.KGRO MtUS/W^CtF-pp*
CO 3A*F»Le MeTER/B*MG€/PPM
CO 8CKCND -(IEH/«*^C?/PP1
Co* 9AHPLE METER/RANCe/jCT
CO* RCK6MO "tTtO/HiNCC/PCT
NO! HCHGtO MCTEH/RANCE/MH
MC
CO* CQNCCMTRfcH
NOI CONCEWTHATI
MC «ASS CHANS
CO "ASS CHINS
CO? "ASS G»4N3
NOI «USS &RAH3
CO SHAH3/KH
NO! 6RAM3/KN
RUN rp*c accosoa
«vc. C»H. OXTCCN VOCENT
CATALYST *vo. TF.MF, Dec. C
CATALYST »**«. TEH*. OEG. c
D'C, fT (D*O
scr, er (o»»)
VOL t t*O
NX ( CASUHED)
C0M'091te RESULTS
TEST NUM0e« te«-ii
•A»0«eTe* NM HG 73^. »
HUNlOlir G/KC 10.3
TCNpCHATUirC DEG C 21.1
TABU E-18. TEST 122 EMISSIONS RESULTS
|*t FT>» VJMICLt fllSlONS MCSULTI * IGNITION
FROJtCT ..--.m-QOi
VEHICLE **0. *
DATt 7/11/7
BAC CA*f DO.
OTNO MO.
CV» NO.
DRY BULB TCHP. H,i OE6 C{70.0 OE6 f}
tft». HUM1Q11V 10.3 &N/NC
TEST M1CHT l»
ACTUAL AOAO L0*0
«t(
1.0
»>« L»
H( 10.7
HOI "UXIOIIT COMCCTla" »«CIO«
HOT TDtNilCNT
TOTAL FU(
•VS. EIH
CATALYST
CATALYST
7k2.0 (10.0)
7k2.0 (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
• 09*7
79.' (2k7'.2>
.!/ »/ 10
kk.l/ I/ 170'
T.I/ I/ 1.J9
'.i/ I/ .Ok
l.O/ 2/ 1
1.12
'71
Ik20
.2*
7.k
2.**
1 1.12
I 'k.k
9.JI
7.1k
2».7I
111.0
.•1
19. «1
90*
2.11
22'
9«'
9.71
.'11
1.000
L SUL'UR M./«M 10
OIY6EN PCT 2
AV6, TEHP. OEG C
MAI. TEN*. OEG C
7k2.0 (10.0)
7k2.0 (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
k'k99
110.1 (t9'k.9)
20. 7/ 11 11
ll.Vll/ 2'
'.O/ I/ ,0k
,7/ 2/ 1
1'.22
7
17
.SB
21.'
.99
2.k9
9.M
.0'
.•1
111.1
.'9
1*.*7
Ik7
l.'l
997
klO
k.<0
( .I'D
( ,'7k)
20k. 0
11. 'B
7k2.0 (10.0)
7k2.0 (10. 0)
•1.1 (110.0)
• 09«2
79.7 (2k79.1)
2 11 I/ 22
10 k/11/ 170
7/11/ 2
1 9/ }/ .09
9/ tl i
'.'I
102
192
1.29
2'.0
•••7
11.02
1 72'. 1
».!»
.77
l.JI
100.0
. 72
11.27
909
1."
••<
k27
9.7k
.•22 (
I. 000 (
.'k CAHBO* D10I1DE 6/KN
•t* MVO«OCA*>ONJ (IMC) G/«M
k27 CA»BON NONOIIOE G/IN
7k2*0 (10.0)
7k«.0 (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
k'kOO
110.0 («9'2. )
17 9/ 2/ 1
11 I/ t' 1
19 l/ll/ 1
2 a/Hi
> 7/ I/ .Ok
T/ 11 \
19.91
7
2B
.11
21.7
.91
• .10
1'20. 1
9.12
.0'
.k'
10'. 0
.'•
11.29
Bk7
l.kl
97k
k21
k.lk
.'0')
,'7k)
209.1
11. '•
1-BAC (•
121.1 ( 1
1.71 (
k.l> (
.91 (
BAC)
!.•)
.01)
.71)
• ••I)
.«•>
»T VEHICLE t«I»IONJ KEIUITS - ICN1T1BN HIJF1»E
PROJECT 11-»"1-001
vCHtCLE MODEL 71 CHCV. NAL(8U
ENCIM t.u L(10< CIO) V.I
TEST HUNHeR
TEST CTCLE
• UN Nk)NflER
DATE
OOONETCft
CVS • SAC CAAT • OTNANUNETEfl
TE«'E>ATU*E DEC. C (DEC. F)
"ILAIIVE «U«10tt«. »CT
aA*o<ETER/RA>|CE/PPH
CO 9AMPV.E Hf.TER/*UNGE/PPH
co RCKGNO HETER/RANGE/PPN
C02 BCKGRO HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOD SAMPLE IETER/RANGC/PPN
MO* BC"r,no MCTER/RANGE/PPM
CO CONCENTR TION PPH
C02 CONCENI TION PCT
NOI C0NCENI TION pf>H
CO «A99 G« 9
COt »1SS CR S
N0> NASS C* S
»FC, » (DRV)
SCF, >E (DRV)
VOL ISC )
KN (HE SUREO)
TEBT NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
NUNIOITr,
TEMPERATURE.
TOTAL FUEL SULFURr
AV6. EIH
PVMT
NN HQ
G/K6
OEG C
HG/KN
OXYGEN* PCT
CATALYST «»S. TEnP.. OES C
CATALYST »A>. TEMP., OEG C
FUEL CUNSUNPTION, L/10QKM
MfDMOCAftftOMS, C/MH
CARBON HONOIIDE. G/HH
OV.1QCS OF NITROGEN, C/KM
VEHICLE NO. 1<
T.KAM9V139IOH »!
SV. >t,.o >C( ••<•
121-11
SET
1/11/71
«2<«N( Ibl
2*1-1
21.' / 79. D
*7.«
71'. k (I-.12)
ll'T
7ki,0 (10.0)
7k*. 0 (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
112111
20*. k (7«02. )
97. i/ 2/ 9
!.•/ 2/
97.0/11/ «2
l.l/ll/
91. •/ I/ 1.9
•.0/ I/ .0
k9.t/ «/ (•
l.J/ 2/ 2
90
kl.k
k.ai
• 7.0*
970*. 2
i*.l*i
.112 ( ,I7«)
UOOQ C .'771
20*. k
tl.'k
122-11
73*. k
'.1
11.'
2».»7
1.7*
kl«
79k
25«.7
11. »2
.27
• .•2
1.1U
L>9)
TEST 'EIGHT 191) >.( 1900 LSI)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAO 1.0 KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE f«-l»»
122-11
HFET
1
7/11/71
«k7«N( 170
2-1-1
'J'.k I2-.12)
7kk
>k2.0 (10.0)
•>•> (110.0>
kltkl
IK.' (»097. )
27.
-------
TABU E-19. TEST 123 EMISSIONS RESULTS
»y« - 111 '!' VEHICLE EBI1JIO«I «CJU1.TS . U"."OUIH£0
VEHICLE MODEL 7S CHEv. NALlftU
INCINE f.O L(30» CID) V-i
TRANSMISSION A]
BAROMETER 7*1.70 "" MC(H.I* IN HC)
SAC RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H<0(IN. H|0)
BLONER iNi.tr F MM. W?QCIK, "to)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEC. CCDEC. M
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CO BCKCRO METER/RANCE/PPM
coj SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PCT
NOI SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION MM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COl CONCENTRATION PCT
CO MASS CRAMS
CO CRAMB/KH
NOK CRAMS/MM
RUN TINE SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
Off, «ET (DRY)
SCF, »ET (DRY)
VOL <>O>
KN (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER 121-11 TO
BAROMETER MM HC 7*2.7 *V
MUMIOITv c/KC 11.* CA
VEHICLE "OOCL 71 CHEv. MALIBU
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
BAROMETER. MM HCUN MC)
RUN TIME/ SECONDS
BLONER OIF P MM, MiOUN. H20)
co SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
co BCKCRO MEFER/RANCE/PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COl CONCENTRATION PCT
MC MASS CRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
COl MASI CRAMS
NOD MASS CHANS
DFC. «ET (DRY)
SCF, *ET (DRV)
VOL (SCM)
MM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER. PVNT
BAROMETER. -M HC
MUNlOlf», C/HQ
TEMPERATURE. OtC C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR. MC/MN
AVC. EXH. OIYCEM* PCT
CARBON DIO'lOt, C/KN
CARBON NONOUDE, S/**
OXIDES OF NITROCEN, C/«M
DATE I/ 3/7
SAC CAST NU.
DYNQ NO.
Cvs NO.
DRY «UL8 TEMP.
1
COLD TRANSIENT
7b2.0 ( 10.0)
<3.3 (110.0)
*0(7S
l.l/ 3/ 2S
S.2S
l«73
30.1
I.St
175.01
*.S*
30.31
.to
SO*
1.37
1.000
129-12
SET
1
S/ 9/71
2-1-3
SO. 0
7*9.2 (24.2k)
11*7
7b2.0 (30.0)
7h2.0 (30.0)
*3.) (111.0)
210.* C7*SO.
(7.B/12/ 12
l.S/J?/
».7/ 3/ .0
IB.O/ J/ S
.•/ I/
121
1.0*
t*. 70
.It* ( .IflO)
1.001 ( .'77)
210.*
21. s;
121-12
7*9.2
• .*
22. «
21.37
l.lb
2S3.2
.ns
1.37
.*!
ACTUAL «0*0 L0*0
ODONETEM 7b01 KM
21.7 OEC C(71.fl DEC F)
2 3
STABILIZED MOT ri*AN5IE*T
7b2.0 (30.0) 71.2.1) (30.0)
7b2.0 OO.Q) 7W.Q (.30.0)
*3.3 (110.0) *3.3 (110.0)
b*b21 lUSib
l^.S/13/ If 2.3/U/ 7
l.OX 2/ 1 .?/ i/ I
1*.BO 1U.SO
21 It3
.t* l.li
.2S 1.10
3.17 Ik. 2*
2000.0 Ik&U.t
3. BO *.2*
.S2 i.tl
.k2 .75
Ik? SO*
2.20 2.iO
*kk »b*
( .f*t) ' ,*2* ( .
( .*'*) 1.000 ( .
11. •* J
OXIDES OF MTROCEN C/KN
A3 ACTUAL BUAD L0*0
123-13
KFET
1
S/ 3/7t
2*1-3
23.9 / 7*.Q
7*1.2 (2^.2k)
7k2.0 (90.0)
7 2.0 (30.0)
3.3 (110.0
klSSl
1 S.7 (vORk.l)
.I/I?/
* .S/ 3/ L.B
.a/ 3/ .0
• .•/ 2/ •
.O/ ?/
8
110
.SI
37**. b
17.21
.Ik2 ( .BS2)
1.000 ( .*?2)
US. 7
Ib.SO
1*3-13
7*3.2
23.3
20.**
1. 1*
SS5
bOI
227.1
.03
i]o*
R.O Hfl( 10. 7 HP)
*'i!3 MILES)
S'AUlLUtO
7b2.0 (311.11
7k2.D liU.D
»1.3 110. )
b<* 77
li.1*/ /
10. b/ /
5.7/13/
IS. 51
3
.«0
17.1
.2
1.3
*.3
.*
. 7
2.S8
b.12
*10)
«75)
1.81
3-bAG (**AA
• ^ C .3
7.J§ [ 7.2
•** ( .7
B.Q «*( 1».7 HP)
/ /
E-20
-------
TWl£ E-20. TEST 123 EMISS10MS RESULTS
PVH - lil »TP VEHICLE («1>91009 "HOLTI - OIJ1BLCO EM
TEST MO. iii-ii «im i
VCHICLf "OOIL '« CHtv. M«LI«U
IitI up 1,0 L(in« CIO) v.l
Y*AH3*l3ftlOH kl
CVK loio ««( 1111 L»S)
•»OH{TE« >io.ik MM Mooi.ii m HS)
pflMlVE »»U»MD1TT kl PCT
(1C 11SULTS
>IC NUM«C«
OHC'I'TION
«10«E« Olf P MM, M|0(IN. K101
PLOMfP INLET P »M. M«0(I*i, MIO)
HONE" INLET TEMP. Dec. noes. F
W.OHEM dfvOLUTIOHS
CVI FL.O« JTO. CU. M(T«FI(«Fl
MC BCKGPD Mf TE«/P»NCE/PPM
CO J'Mpii "ftf«/«»Nr.t/P««
CO BCKfiBIJ MfrEI/PfRE/PPM
COi S«"»l( "F.TM/PINSE/PCT
COf BCMQPO <*F.TE»'N*NGE/PCT
NOI IC'
MC
CO CONCEXTIITIOII ••"
coi co»cf•
»c **>ai 5«««s
CO «>91 C"'»9
COI ~»S» t«l«J
NOI **M9 QllftllS
CO S»»ni/«»
COI 5«l«J/«»
NOI CH4W9/KM
• UN UNJ MCOU09
»VC, EIN. (Kvtfl »f"CE1T
otiirtT ivc, rc»>. OEC. c
9CF. "ET {0«r>
»«l. |9C»>
«» ("EJSU'EOI
VtHRLl NO.
04TI tt 1/
iAG C1"T MO.
OYNO NO.
CVI NO.
TE3T *fIGMT \\t
t»t90t.l*t€ ft**)**
DA* BML0 TEMP. 11.7 0€C CC1.0 QCQ
l«9. HU»I01Tt 10.1 C"/«C
COLO 1'INSirxT
NOI UUOIOITr COIXCTION (1C10H 1,00
TOTAi. PUEl
tvC. EkM. OSYftEN
C«T«LTST
ClT«l»5T
711.9 (11.9)
711*9 (11.5)
19.9 (1 10. n)
*>
,1'kl
11.19
11 C«0(
3' FUEL
71 CAtBC
711.9 (?1. S)
711. 9 (11 , § )
19.9 (110, n)
Iflkkt
I,*/ I/ 1
17.B/1I/ HI
l.l/ll/ 1
I.I/ 11 ,0k
.I/ I/ 1
11.70
II
190
1 07
I'.l
.11
10.11
k.H
.Ik
9.11
!$!,•
1.10
11.11
sot
1.31
3kl
S.'k
.ill
1.000
3N DIOIIOE G/«H
CONSUMPTION L/100BI
IN MQNOilOE (;/»»
711.3 (11, S)
'11.1 (11. »)
13.1 (110. n)
11, 1' 11 li
l«!l/ll/ I*
'ill/ J' :"
.i/ ?/ i
U.'l
1
11
'f
17,0
,?'
l.'l
k,'l
.04
.11
II), 1
1.01
11,31
• k'
l.kl
i]'
kl*0
( .11')
IOk.1
11. K
Ji"t ('«!"!
* 19.1? ( lf.Pl)
kill < k'.|1)
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/*u
rear NUMH;*
TIS1 C1CLE
• UN NU"«f.«
o*T • ovMtMnMCTrtt
TE«»e»»TilKF DEC, C (OE6, F)
MU'TIve MUMTOTTV, PCT
»«»o»nf». "" »oE9(9CF)
»*C )*M*LE MPtf»/»»N6t /PPM
»c «c«s«n "FTE«/«*N(;e/pp"
CO 9»»Pif «Frr«/»««nE/«p«
CO ICNCPn MfTE»/DANOE/»PM
COI 5«"PIE »fTE«/»«»f.E/»CT
coi icneio t>eTE»/»*iiiE/PCT
MOM 9iMpLf M^TEP/NtNCE/PPM
NOI ICKOO MFTE»/»NliC/PPM
HC CONCt»*TB»TtO»« »•«
CO CONCE«T»»tION »P»
COI CONCFNT««TION PCT
HOI COHCENTPITION PPM
»c "»«s e««"s
CO »•«> 8»»"S
COf MISS .P>M9
H0> »I9 C»»MJ
OFC, per loot)
9CF. MET (DPV)
VOL UCMI
TEST
•»0«tT(P,
»U«10M»,
OTtLTIT ivcj TEMP,, tlfO c
C«T«LT8T Mil. TEMP,, OEC C
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
'"OJICT 11-1
VEHICLE **0.
CVH ^010 K6(
19.1 / 7t.O
17. «
'10.1 (11,1')
'11.9 9)
ACTUAL MOAD LOtO 1.0 RP( 10.7 MP)
CASOLINC EM-lii
•I 1/71
tOMUMf S011MILES)
1*1-1
19.1 / 75."
".1
'10.1 (?1.I7)
7kk
711,1 <*1.l)
11.1 (111.")
i.l (1070.1)
II
.«/ I/
10
,»ll> 111
.>'!!/ 3
,fc/ t/ l.kl
.•/ 9/ .Rk
.I/ >/ IK
.I/ >/ 1
1
l»»
1*1.1
.k9
Ik, 07
ntn.l
It. ik
.179 ( .Ikk)
1.000 ( ,17k)
I»V*9
710. »
• .1
J9.1
H"
lll.l
onoca or NITKOMH,
.Ok
1."
1.19
E-21
-------
TABU E-21. TEST 12J MISSIONS RESULTS
IRAN1NIS310* Al
•A« RESULTS
BAC «4u*»tR
DESCRIPTION
BLOHE* im.lt TEMP. DEG. C(OtC. f)
HC tCKGRO *ETER/RAN&e/P»M
DILUTION: ric.3/ 3/ 173
l.U 3/ 11
L.O/ I/ 23
».!/ 3/ .Ob
l.S/ 2/ 2
1*0.01
310. »
11. OS
I.b4
203
*lt
1.000 (
.1 DEC C(70.0 DEC
STABILIZED
7 4.3 (24. 5)
3.3 (110.0)
1 .$/ 2/ IS
1 .I/ 2/ 12
12.I/13/ 12
I.I/ ]/ .Ok
I.*/ 2/ 2
IS. 41
20
.Rl
**.»
.3
.0
31S.
13. b
• bk
2,*t
-*7%)
20%. 4
11. SS
• FUEL c
GASOLINE EM-3t«
ft
3 *
MOT TRANSIENT S1AHILIZCO
33. 2/ if 1 I1*.*/ HP)
T€!H CTCLC
•UN NU*I«CR
DATE
OOQHCTlft
TEfiPEMATURE uCt. C (UlS. ')
Of |,»l |VC MUMfOl If , FC T
9*BO«eIt», KH HC(IN «C)
•UN TINC, stCQ^os
SLOWER DIP » MN. H20CIN. H?0)
BLO«ER INLET P HM. H20(lN. H^O
0LOMER I»LET TtMP. OH. C(0tt.
6LO«fN HEVOLUTIONS
CV| HUM 310. CU. HFTRE3(3CF)
HC 9CHCRO NETER/DANCE/P»M
co SAMPLE MC TER/P* NCC/PPM
co acKCHO METEI
E/PCT
E/PCT
CO CONCENTRATION PP»
DFC, NET (
SC^. "Ef l
VOL (SCN)
MM (Nf AiU
TEST NUMBER*
TEMPERATURE.
TOTAL FUEL l
CkRdON 010B1VE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
C/N6
ore c
otc c
0£C C
Ul-32
SET
i
1/10/71
2 - 1 - 3
22.1 / 73.0
90.1
7*1.7 (24.20)
7*4.1 (24.S)
210.4 (7*41.2)
22.*/ 2/ 22
vo.s/ i/ 11
B».J/lt/ *07
2.4/12/ *
71.4/ I/ 1.11
4.S/ J/ .01
S0.4/ 2/ 10
.b/ */ 1
13
1^*
1.32
30.3k
.14* ( .BSb)
1.000 ( .477)
210.4
21.kl
123-32
7*1. 7
1.4
22.S
21.45
1.10
SOI
bflb
I Ib. )
10.2*
.07
t.il
J.40
123-33
HftJ
f/10/11
il5H"( *Ok«M
a - i - i
2S.O / 77.0
*2.*
7*1.7 [24.20)
7*4.1 (24.S)
7*4.3 (24.S)
»».» (104.0)
blS17
llS.k (4004.7)
.2/ 2/ 21
.4/ 2/ 11
.1/12/ Ik*
.0/I2/ 3
.)/ 3/ 1.71
3/
1S9
l.kb
!'B
20.hL
1S07.4
IS.01
.B71 ( .BbS)
l.UOO ( .477)
11$.b
lb.2«
121-19
741 . 7
• .•
25.0
14.14
1.15
.'15
1.* 7
l.S*
£-22
-------
TABLE E-22. TEST 12* EMISSIONS RESULTS
- If* fit VEHICLE E«I99TOM» HEIULTI - UNMODIFIED
TFJT 10. iji-ii 'm i
CNCINF 4.0 LOUS CtO) V.I
• AC HUM8M
Oe«C*IpTTOH
•(.flue* nIF f t«M. HaorlN. H(0>
BLOWM INt«T TEHP. OFC. CfOCC. F)
HLnwc. nevntuTinNS
"ILUTIOH FACtOH
co cnuctHT.ftTloH •»»
HC HA3S GIAK3
MOV HAS3 GAAH3
co s.Am/KH
CO? SUMS/*"
MOV CPAM9/MH
•UN Tine 3Fco*m9
HF.ASUMD DISTANCE KM
OFC, «fT (0"»)
scr. «tT (out)
vm (»c»)
«- (HOaURCO)
CONPOJITt DC3ULTS
»u»ioit» C/KC -ii.i
VFHICLC NO. 1<
• 1C C»T »0. 1
D1NO 10. 1
CVI HO. I
our nut* ir»F>. «i
tag. HUHIOITY 11.
1
>k?'.o (in^O)
•l.l (lln.ni
• 0)11
)k.l (?k«S.«)
l.l/ I/ 11
!».«/ I/ 1101
.k/ I/ 11
!.»/ ]/ .nf
I'.J/ J/ 11
.3/ 2/ 0
IIS
1.0*
104.0
.M
»»*
t.'l
l.nnn |
TOTAL riir.i suiFU« He/»< »t.
T»T HCICHT H««
ACTUAL »OAO LOAD
CAioLixe e"-i"
K9( 1SOO LB9>
.) OCC CC1.0 OfC F)
4 6M/KC NOI HUMIDITY COHICCTION FACTO* l.ol
t 1 •
*TAH11IZ€0 HOT TRinftttHT ST AMU ItB
'kl.O (ln.0) 7k(.o (in.o) >kf. (10.0)
'ki.O (1X.O) Ikl.O (10.0) )kj. (10.0)
»«.) (111.0) 0.1 (110.0) •!. (110.0)
110. k («kl!.l) >k.t (Zktl.l) 110. (IkOI.O
'.?/ it 10 '.*/ 0 l.O/ (/
It. k 11. kl
.1 1.0*
. 9 .**
I'M. lllk.l
l.k 9.1k
.0 .0*
.1 .'1
111. Ikk.l
llll lll't
Ik? 909
l.«« 1.10
.')»> 1.000 (
11.11
«0 FufL CON3UK.TIOH L/100««
•1 CAHBOI* NPNOItOe S/KM
OIIOCS OF IIIT»OCIN C/«H
J.« 1 ,0k
.»/ > 1
Ik. 1
. 0
1IM.1
.1)1
.0)
*«'.•
.k9
K.9<
Ik)
!«>k)
(Ok.)
11. 0« ( ll.lk)
,ik '. .ikl
.'k ( .)')
S«T VFHICLE CH19SIOM9 >f9ULTS - U
LOOS CIO) V-«
TEST NUM8E*
TEHT CtCLE
OE6. C (DE?,.
HAPQiCTfll, MN Hf;(IN HC)
•UN flNf, AFCOM09
KL^HfO OtF P MM. HiOU**. MZO)
r>L^**e« INLET P MM. Hjon*,. H?O)
»LOHC» I'tLET TPMP. OF*!. C*nEC. F>
HLnWFM •EVOLUTIONS
c»« FLO- 3To. cu. HemFS(scF)
CO
CO
CO? SAMPLE MFTfR/«*NC«/PCT
CO* 4CKGKO NfTCP/AftNUir/PCt
NQI SIMPLE MCTFt/P-INGf/PPN
MOV BCKURO MfTFK/A*NCF/PPw
MC CONCFNTRATION PPM
CO CONCEhTPATIQN PPM
COP CO««.l
.11
.•71 ( .•%))
l.nne ( .*»*)
llf.'
TEHPE*ATU*E. OFT, r,
TflTin. FUCL SULFUW. «R/««
OlO'tOE. A/MM
OHSUMPTIONi i_/I(1rt
AR/POttA, n/HN
10. to
.0*
l.lb
<«*
hl7
E-23
-------
TABU E-23. TEST 12<4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
• CHICK nOOfL 7B CHIV
CN61N7 9.0 LI909 CID) V
THANBNIS910N A]
IL>TI»E HUNIOI
>g «e9UlT9
BAG NUNae*
OCSC'I'TION
0)
• lOKCI INLET • «». HJOJlN. HfO)
BLO«E« INLET Tt»». 0(C. CfOIC. F)
BLO»EH DEVOLUTIONS
CVI '{.Om 510. Cu. NETHEB19CF)
HC 9AN»LE «ETf«/»ANCE/""
HC BCK6BO «»ET(R/II AMCC/PPM
CO SAWtl «CTlB/«»NCE/»»«<
COB SAH»LE HETEH/««NSf/»CT
cm BCKMO «ETf»/««Nce/pcT
NOI 9AH»n NETCII/IAMCE/OH
NOI ocuciio NETE»/«AN«E/«H
DILUTION FACTO"
HC CONCENTBATION »»N
CO CONCENTRATION F-FN
Ctlf CONCCNTBATION F>CT
NOI CONCENTRATION "»
HC (AM CONS
CO NASB 611*1*9
cor NABB CHANS
NOK NAB* CHANS
HC ttNANS/KN
CO BRAN9/HN
COV OANB/HN
NOI OBAHS/KN
FUEL CONSUHFTION BV CB L/IOOKM
•UK TI«E
AVB. €1H. OXVCEN
CATALYST Avfl. TCN»
NlAtuito OIB'TANCC
orc> "IT 1.0*11
scr, nil (ONV)
VOL (1CH)
<» (»(ABUI(D>
occ. c
DEC. C
FNOJECT ll*'771-00l
VEHICLE NO. 1
BAC CAST NO.
OVNO HO.
CVS NO.
1
COLO TRANSIENT
7". 3 li'.tl
7»'.3 (24.9)
'9.1 (110.0)
79.' (2kBt.3>
10. 1/ I/ 101
9. o/ I/ .OB
I.OY i/ 1
B.3'
1B7
1S»7
1.33
3k. 1
1.1'
Ikl. 37
1151.0
l.'B
It.*'
310.7
. 43
19. 7B
SOk
1.1'
TEST DE1CHT 1SBB K«( 3fOO L)S)
9TAOIL11EO
7»4.3 (t'.i)
7". 3 (1'.9)
'3.9 (110.0)
12'. 7 (>9BO.»
» 7/ 3/ .07
«/ 2/ 1
1»,07
11
IBS
.Bk
.k
.k
1 .'
20 2.
.2
• .9
.^
l'.9
Bk<
1 .'1
'99
CASOLINE IH-.J"
OOONETE* 10140
(
M» HUNIOITT COK
3
NOT tlUNSIEKT
7". 3 (2 .9)
7<>'.3 (3 .9}
• OH
79. B (2 7B.1)
IS. S/ It 19
9.9/ 9/ .OB
I.I/ 11 1
10.21
9'
fit
1.17
2k. 3
*.S
19)11.
.,
'. DfC C
10.91
309
CAIIBON 0101 IDE C/KM
FUEL CON9UNPTION L/1QOI
HVO'OCAMONB (TNC) C/*H
CAD*0<« NONOIIOE C/Kf*
OIIOEI OF NITKOCEN H/t*
( 30'.')
( 13.'3)
( .91)
( '.B0>
( .k3)
e MOOCL 71 CHCV. MALlBU
1.11 L(10I CIO) V.|
•ENICLC NO. II
TIAN9HI9SION A3
TtBT HEICHT 1SII «t( 3900 LtB)
ACTUAL HOAO LOAD B.O KN( 10.7 HP)
o*re
OOOHCTC*
CVS * B4C
ocs. c (oec.
NIDITT. I>CT
. .
«LO-f« ("LET TfMH. QCfi. ClDfC. F)
BLAOe* t»f VOLUTIONS
CVI 'LOU 3TO. CU. H
CO
CO
CO*
NOI
C0» CONCIMTMAT10N »*C
MO I CONCENTRATION **
HC 4»sa C*ANS
CO •«*$» CRAMS
COf *»« BRAHS
HOI ">*19 6R*«9
ore. NCI (o«ti
ICF. -CT (DRY)
VOL
9.3 (110.0)
SO
9.1/ 9/ .0
1^3/ I/
«1B
.it; ( .171)
1.000 ( .'7k)
f. / Ik.O
9.1
737. (3'.01)
( 110.D)
IkOO
10.)
«i!o
1.'
.Bk
1.00
2/ 1
3/ 1
If/ 29
12' 1
)/ 1.7
1' .0
«/ 7
2/
1.1
1.23
B.S7
21.'
9.00
( .BIB)
( .'79)
'.'
.1'
7.1
B.'
CARfON OIOilOC* 6/n«
^UCL COM9UNRTION, L/100K*
CAMION
0ITOC9
23.'B
1.01
.31
bOk
'.70
.OB
1.77
.'3
E-24
-------
TABU E-24, TEST 124 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVN - in FTP VEHICLE l"l««lo»« RESUITI . NUN OIL CONSUMPTION
tear MO. U4-91 RUN i
VEHICLE NOOCL 'I CMEV. NALISU
EHOIHE 1.0 tOOt CIO) »-I
TRANSMISSION ii
BVR rflto KC( 4441 ItS)
RELATIVE HUNfOlfr bl PCT
IAS RESULTS
tit HUNBER
DESCRIPTION
ILOMER OIF P NN. HtOdH. HtO)
•LONER INLET TENP. DEC. C(OEO.
RLONER REVOLUTIONS
cv* FLOW STO. cu. NETRES(SCF)
HC SANPLE METER/RANCE/PPN
HC ICKCRD HETER/HANCE/PPH
CO SAMpit NETER/NANCE/PPN
CO ICHCNO HETEH/HANCE/PPN
COt SAMPLE NETER/RANCE/PCT
N0> 9ANRIE NETCR/RANCE/PPM
N0» 1C»6«0 HETE»/RANliE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
NC CONCENTDATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C0< CONCENTRATION PCT
NOY. CONCCNltlATlOM PPM
NC "AB8 CHANS
CO NASS CHANS
cot NASS CHANS
NO* 4A8S CHANS
NC 6HANS/KH
CO CHANS/UN
C0< MANS/UN
NO* MANS/IN
FUEL CONIUHPTION
Cll L/100RN
SECONDS
PERCENT
DEC. C
DEC. C
UN
•UN TINJ
AVC. EXM. OxvCEN
CATALYST AVO. IENP.
CATALT9T MAI. IJNr.
NCAIUICO DISTANCE
o'c. NCT (o«»)
scr> NET (our)
VOL (SCN)
«N (XEASUOEO)
CONPOSI'C HCSULTS
rE4T MUNBER K4-11
il»ON(t(« NN HC 7K.<
NUH101TV ftyNC id. «
TENPEIATUIC occ c n.t
VENICLE NO. 11
(AC Cl«t NO. 1
DYNO NO. I
CVS NO. 1
DRY BULB TENP. It.
All. HUMIDITY 10.4
,
COLD TRANSIENT
744.9 (14. I)
744.9 (14. 4)
49.9 (110.0)
.'/ M Ik
»!,/ 3, *07
91. 7/ I/ 9k
I.I/ I/ 1
• .It
177
1711
l.lk
94 * I
7.74
Ill.k9
17S7. t
5.11
I.Ik
17. k9
10k. 1
.14
It. 10
tot
1.14
101
41k
1.74
1 DCC C(79.0 DEC F)
CM/KB
1
STABILIZED
7kl. (10.0)
7kl. (10.0)
41. (110.0)
4.0/ I/ .Ok
4.S/ 11 10
.I/ I/ 1
If. 01
,,
tfcfc
.10
1.1
1.91
1404. 9
1.14
.91
101.1
.91
11. 44
Ik 7
1.11
491
4k4
k.10
TEST HEICMT
CkSOLIHE tM-
OOOMETEI 101
NOI HUMIDITY
9
NOT TRANSIENT
7kt.o (90.0)
7kl.O (90.0)
«1.1 (UO.O)
7k. 0 (lkBt,7)
4t.l/ll/ 441
1.9/lt/ 10
4. I/ I/ .Ok
II. 4/ 11 It
.11 11 1
10. kl
fl
1.11
1*14
40.7k
Ikll. 4
l.ki
.40
>!oi
171.4
.41
11.41
lot
177
477
1.7k
llll H(( 9100 LIB)
41 >N( H44 MILES)
CORRECTION FACTO* 1
,
BTABILIIED
7kt.ll (10.0)
7kl.l (10.0)
41.1 (110.0)
110.4 (4k04. )
11. 1/ I/ 1
I4.1/11/ It
4.k/ I/ .0
11. I/ I/ 1
.I/ I/ 1
It.'k
19
,77
10.4
.41
Ik. II
llll.k
l.kO
.11
i.kk
i4k.t
.41
11.11
•kl
1.10
447
417
k.10
10k.4
11.44
10k. 9
11.4k
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR NC/KH I4.ik
AVC. EIN. OITCEN PCT 1.19
CATALYST AVC. TENP. OEC C 114
CATALYST NAX. TENP. OEC C 477
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
C/KN
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (TMC) C/KN
CARBON MONOXIDE t/KM
oxioes OF NITHOCEN «/«."
11. o*
.44
19.17)
.11)
VENICLE ENI9SIONB RE1UITI - NICK OIL CONSUMPTION
PROJECT 11-<771-001
VENICLE NODCL 71 CHEV. MALIBU
ENCINE <.o Liiot CIO) v.t
TEST NUMBER
TEST CTCLE
PUN NUNttR
OATE
OOONETER
TENPERATURE DEC. C (DEC. P)
PELATIVI HUMIOIT1* PCT
PA>0<S 'L0» JTO. CU. NETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE NETER/DANftE/PPN
CO SC'CRO NETER'RANCE'PPM
cot IANPLE NCTER/RANCE/PCT
NOI SANPLE NETER/RANGE/PPN
NOX BCKCRO NETER/RANGE/PPN
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
NO* CONCENTRATION PPM
MC HA99 CHANS
CO NAIS CRAMS
COt MASS CRAMS
NOX MASS CHANS
O'C/ "ET (ORY)
9CF, MET (ORY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST
«l"OHEH»,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
TOTAL FUEL SUI.FUK,
PVNT
MM HB
C/KC
OEO C
MC/KM
AVC. E>N. OVYCEN,
CATALYST AVO. ItM1
PCT
otc c
CATALYST NA«. TENP., OEC C
CARION DIOXIDE, C/KN
FUEL CONSUMPTION. L/100KM
VEHICLE NO. II
TRANSMISSION A9
C»N tO«0 «C( »»M
SET
I
«/M/7t
0«H( -ONILEI)
1 - 1 - 1
It.O / 77.0
It. I
714.' (14.11)
114k
7kl.O (10.0)
7kZ.O (10.0)
•9.9 (110.0)
111411
110. I (7414. *)
44. 4/ I/ 44
11. I/ t/ 14
4I.4/11/ til
l.l/ll/ »
TEST NtiCHT list N
C/IIN
I.I/ I/
14.I/ II 14
l.O/ I/ 1
441
1.14
11.9
4.10
110.41
1171.0
11.11
.I4t ( .••»)
1.000 ( .477)
110.1
11.40
114-91
794.4
10.7
It.O
lt.4f
1.17
to 7
S44
19k.1
10.41
.11
I.to
.70
114-99
NPET
4/14/71
OKM( -OMILEB)
1*1-9
417
I
794.4 (t4.U)
>kt
7kl.l (10.0)
7fct.« (10.0)
41.1 (110.0)
.17.•
I1I.< (407k.k)
».7/ I/ Ik
ta.o/ l/
I7.I/II/
l.l/ll/
47.t/ 9/ 1.19
I.'/ I/ ,0k
kt.O/ I/ kt
I.I/ */ 1
17
4OO
1.71
kl.l
1.10
tl. 7B
17k4.0
19. k7
.1.0 ( .»»>
1.000 ( .474)
lit.4
Ik.91
114.19
714.4
10.0
II.0
11.kl
.kl
171
k!7
tll.n
10.04
E-25
-------
TABLE E-25. TEST 131 EMISSIONS RESULTS
IE91 NO. 111-11 RUN 1
ENGINE 1.0 1(101 CIO) v-1
C»n toil «G( 111) LB»
RELATIVE HUHJOITY 71 PC f
•At REBULI9
OESCMIP'ION
BLOHER INLET TEHP. OEC. C(DEC. F)
CVS FLU* 9TD. CU. "ETRE9(9CF)
cot BAHPLE NETER/RANGE/PCT
DILUTION FACTO*
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
NC MA19 GRANS
NO! NAB9 GRAMS
CO SRAH9/KN
•UN )|«E 9ICOHD1
CATALYST MAI. TE«F. OEC. C
OFC, MET (DRY)
3CF, "(I (0*T>
VOL (9CN)
FIOJCCT ll-»77l-00l
VEHICLE NO. 13
BAG CART
0*NO NO.
cva NO.
i
COLO T«A«J
'bt.o (30
7bt.U (10
• 1.' (11
Bl.t/ 11
.!/ I/
•t.'/ a/
3.'/ I/
7)
l.bB
SI. 1'
I.I:
.9b
• .•b
.5'
IB. 00
S.25
NO. 1
1
1
IE»< 9TA8IL11EO
.0) 7bt.O (10. D)
.0} 7bt.O (10.0)
1.0) '1.1 (110. 0)
7 b.b/11/ b
.Ob •.!/ I/ .07
1 l.f/ t/ t
11. ib
7
1
1.11
10.'
1.0
.0
.0
nil
Ibl
5.55
1(1
b.lS
.B" ( .BBO)
1.000 ( .'71)
101. i
11. '1
TE9T HEIGHT 1MB KC( 1SOO Lei)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD B.O KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EN-3"
ODONCTER lb'1 ««( 10S1 "ILE91
MOX HUNID1TV
3
HOT TRANSIENT
7bt.O (30.0)
7bt.O (30.0)
'1.1 (110.0)
'.!/ )/ .07
CORRECTION FACTOR 1.11
»
ITAMLI1CO
7bl.O (10.0)
7bl.O (30.0)
•1.1 (110.01
k'SIl
k.k/11/ b
'.*/ 3/ .07
I.)/ 11 1 l.i/ I/ 1
S.bV 11. 7B
1 b
1 3
1.' 1.07
1'. 10. b
1*. 1 '.»
tOSI.O tf'b.t
.0' .01
.ts .Ob
IS'.I '11.'
.'B .11
IS. 17 U.bl
S04 Bb7
5.55 5.40
•13 l'»
SB' S.I'
I*7B b.ll
.'0' ( .BBO
1.000 ( ,'7t)
11.')
1-BAG (VB
OIOXIOE G/NN 'Ob.l ( '00
OI10C9 OF NITROGEN C/«N
.IB (
l.'l ( 1.
.'» (
.1)
11)
'»>
F»« - 111 SB! VEHICLE EM9SION8 RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
vfHICLl HOOIL >l CH!» HI
ticINj i.o Kim CIO) »-•
TC5I NUNflEU
US' CTCLI
RUN NUNBCN
TENFERATURE OEC. C (DEC. F)
RELAIIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
. HIO)
lN. Hiu)
C(OEC. F)
• UN IINE/9ECOND9
9LO-<« OIF F MH. nt
BLOMEH INLET t MM.
.
•LOMEM KEVOLUTIONI
C«9 >LO> 310. CU. «EI>E9(9C')
HC 94N»LE MCTE/«NGE/>cr
»oi BCHCRO HETER/RANGE
HC CONCENTRATION »FM
CO CONCENTRATION FFH
COt CONCENTRATION FCT
101 CONCENTRATION P»N
HC MAB9 CRANS
CO MA99 GRAM]
COt MA99 GRAMS
OFC, MET (0«Y)
9CF, «ET (DRY)
VOL (JCH)
KM (MEA9URCO)
TE9T MUMBE*.
BAKOXETEH*
HUN10ITT,
HH>!«»IU«t.
TOTAL FUEL 9ULFUM,
6/NC
OEC C
CATALT9T AVC. TEMF.
CATALT9T HI.. I{N».
CADBON OIOIIOE.
FUEL COH9UH*T[ON,
HVO«OCAflBOM9,
CARBON MONOIIDE*
OIIOEB OF «il»0t€«.
> OEC t.
L/!00«»
PROJECT 11-iVJl-OOl
VEHICLE HO. 11
T»A-i9itISaiON AJ
6V» (OS* K«( *f<> >••»}
ill-11
SET
i
9/I1/7B
|717«M( 10b7l
-------
TABLE E-26. TEST 151 EH1SSIOKS RESULTS
KIT NO. 111-11 DUN 1
HldC MODEL 71 CNEV HALIBU CAL
CINE 1.0 LtlOI CIO) »••
ANIHISaiON Al
1011 «C( till LB3)
RonEtER jti.io mi neu*.2b I" NO
LATIYE HUMIDITY u PCT
6 RtauLTa
• AC HUMtR
DESCRIPTION
IIO»(R 01' ' HH, HIOdH. "10)
BLOIlCR INLET P HH. H|0(IH. H10)
BLOHCR IHLET TEHP. oec. C(OES. r>
ILOHER ttEIOLDTlCHt
C»3 FLO« 3TO. CU. HETRE9(aCP>
HC »c«c»o NETER/RAHce/pp"
co IANPLE HETER/RANCE/PP*
CO BCKCRO HETER/RAHCE/PPH
cot »A»PLE KITER/IIAHCE/PCT
COr aCKCRO HETEI/RANH/PCT
HOI BAHPLE HETER/RAHOE/PPH
HOI OCKCRD HETEH/RAHeE/PPH
OILUTIOH PACTOR
HC COHCIH'DITIOM PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
coi CONCEHTHATION PCT
HOI COKCENTRATIOH PPH
CO HAI3 0*1*3
HOI HAIB CRAHI
TP VEHICLE E»t
PROJECT 11-
•ENtCLE HO.
DATE S/ll/7
BA6 CART HO.
OYNO NO.
CV> HO.
OKI »UV.» TEnt>. Jt.t OEt C
ABB. HUftlDITf 18.1 CH/KC
aioiit »aiH.T> - >tCH aiai ton
UST (E1CHT 11BB I
ACTUAL ROAO LOAO I
GA30L1HE EH*ltt
OOOHITER 1071 >H(
C( 1JOO LI3)
HOI HUHIOin CORftECTIOM p«c*0<>
lilt
COLO TRAN9ICNT 1TABILI1EO HOT TRAHIItNT BlAIILIZEO
73k. k (Jt.O) 7kl.O (10.0) 7kl.o (10.0) 7kl.O (10.0)
71k. k (J'.O) 7kl.O (10.0) 7k».0 (10.0) 7kl.O (10.0)
tt.t (111.0) tl.t (111.0) tt.t (111.0) tl.t (111.0)
to70l ktklt tOblt btttb
It
tl
t
17
1
.a/
.o/
.!/
.11
.!/
I/
}/
]/
I/
I/
11 10.1/11/
.Ok t.7/ I/
17 l.i/ i/
i i.a/ i/
t 10.11
la t.7/n/ t i
.07 t.t/ I/ .07 »
t It. I/ I/ 11 7
1 .»/ I/ 1 1
a. oi
1/1 1/
o/ i/
t/ i/
'/ i/
O/ I/
10. tt
1.1
.0
l.kk
lk.1
1.11
7.k
.50
i.ll
tk
1.10
k.l
.17
b.tl
!B7t.O
l.kb
CO SR4MS/KM
COI CRANB/KH
HOI CRAH3/KN
PWEL COHIUHPTION Br Cl
•in tine
«»«. CIH. OITCEN
CATALMT AVC. TCHP.
CATAITIT HAI. re"».
"CA3U«IO OI3T>HCC
OfC. "tt (0«»J
3Cr. »ei conv)
• UL (BC»
«H (KCkSUIICO)
seconoi
PERCENT
OtS. C
on. c
BAKOHCTCI*
HUHI01TV
111-11
HH H6 7«i,<
6/K6 ' 10.1
OEfi C 2*,*
tOl.J
.to
fo«
4.60
171
TOTAL FUEL 3ULPUR HC/KH
AVC. EIH. OITCEH PCT
CATALT3T AVC. TEHP. OC6 C
CATALTBT HAI. TE»». OEC C
.Ok
.tl
.10
IB.tt
laa.t
.Ik
Ik.bt
tbt
kB7
t.77
l.lt
tbl.b
.27
10.01
Ikt
bit
7ia
107.1
11.tt
CARBON OIOIIDE C/HH
PUEL CONJUNCTION L/1001
HID«OCAR»ON3 (THC) C/HN
CARBON HOHOKIOE C/KH
oilota of NITROCEH e/«"
lob.a
it.to
l-BAC
tia.a
.17
I.tl
.It
(t
(
( 1
(
(
(
-BAC)
H.t)
at)
.Ik)
l.ta)
.11)
PVN - 111 3IT VEHICLE EN1»9ION> ttSULTl - RICH BEIT IDLE
PROJECT Il-t771-001
•EHICIE HOOEL >• CHEV HALlBU CAL
CHGIHE 1.0 L(10I CIO) V-l
TE3T HUHBE*
tEat CYCLE
HUM HUHtEM
OATE
OOOHETED
Cot - tA« CA«1
»OHETIII
TEHPE'ATUHE DEC. C (OEO. P)
HUHUt HUHlDlTf. PCI
BAP.OHETCR, HH H6(IH HO)
•UN line, 3ICOH03
BLOH(> OIP P »H. H«0(IH. H?0)
IIOHEI IHI.ET P HH. H10(IH. M20)
B1.0HE* INLET TEHP. OEC. C(OEC. P
BLOHEH IEVOLUTIOH1
c«t PLOH 3'o. cu. HITBEKSCP)
HC SAHPLE HETER/P-AHOE/PPH
HC BCK6P.O HCTCP./P.AHCE/PPH
CO 3AHPLE HETl«/«AH«t/PPH
co acKCBo HETER/P.AHOC/PPH
COt tAHPLE HETED/OHCE/PCT
COI BCKCIIO HETE«/P.AHC(/PCT
•C«C»0 HETEt/DAHCE/PPH
COHCENTP.ATIOH PPH
COt COHCEHTDATIOH PCT
HOI CONCtHMAUOH PPH
HC HA3S 6MAHI
co HAta c«AHa
COI HAtt C«AH!
HOI HAII e»»«»
ore, HET (OUT)
tCP. «CT (OHO
VOL (acH)
«H («EASU«EO)
TC8T NUHBEft. PVHT
BABOHETER* HH M6
"UMOlTl, C/«C
TEHPIIATUIE. ott c
TOTAL PUEL lUL'U*. HO/KH
OCHICLE HO. 11
TRAH3HI33IOH Al
«»» ittt «8l tt<] LID
111-It
9CT
1
l/lt/71
»101«»( 1107HILEt>
1-1-1
• k.l / 74.0
tl.7
7tl.t (It. II)
Ilt7
7kl.O (1B.O)
7kl.B (10.0)
tt.t (111.0)
111111
lit. a (7«u.i>
it. i/ i/ 11
10. i/ i/ 10
70.7/11/ lha
.t/u/ 1
tt.a/ I/ i.at
l.V I/ .07
it. t/ i/ ia
.7/ I/ 1
t
111
l.tt
17. t
.11
ik.aa
7bt*.l
k.to
.atk ( .ait)
i.oo* ( .">>
l«t.l
II. kl
111-11
Jtl.J
t.f
tk.l
11. '7
TEIT >EUHT in
ACTUAL ROAD LOAO
•A10LINC !»-•»»
«C( KOO LBI)
1.0 «•( IB.7 HP)
111-11
HPET
1 • I - 1
ik.l / 7V 0
tl.7
"l.J (14.11)
7kt
lkl.0 (10.0)
iki.a (».o>
tt.t (ll(.O)
klltl
US.l (tBkt.t)
10. 1/ I/ IB
It. I/ I/ It
tt.a/ti/ it
. t/n/ i
it.!/ i/ I. 11
l.l/ I/ .07
lk.7/ I/ 17
.t/
-------
TABL£ E-27. TEST 151 EMISSIONS RESULTS
111 FTP VEHICLE E"I3SIUN» RESULTS - RICH BEST
PROJECT 11-*771-U01
TEST NO. 131-11 OUN i
THANSMISS10N A]
RELATIVE HUNIOIfT 10 PCT
•Aft Ny*»eR
CVS *LO» JTQ. Cy, "CTRESCSeP)
COf SAMPLE METEA/RANtE/PCT
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCEN1»ATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
NO! MASS C*»N1
HC GRANS/MI
CO CRAMS/K"
COX 6RAM9/KH
RUN TIKE SECONDS
CATALYST MAI. ft«P. OCG. C
MEASURED Oil AHCE KM
OFC. »E (DRY)
ICr, HE (OMV)
KM (N( SUREO)
CONPQ4I TE RESULTS
B*G CART NO. 1 GASOLINE FH-]'b
OVNO NO. 3 UOOHfcTER «1S* KM( i3i* MLiS)
t 2 3 «
COLD TRANSIENT STABILIZED HOT TMAfcSIEnt SUtilLUCD
7b*.0 (30. U) 7bJ.Q (jn.O) 7b2.U (30.0) 7t>«.0 (JO.D)
7bt.0(10.0) Jbi.O ( ]U.O) 7b2.U<)n.u) 7* .7 (*SBO.
*0.l/ I/ *1 lb.2/ i/ Ib ?*.!/ «/ i* 11. b/ ?/ i
.!/ 3/ 2 S.Q/13/ S S.0/13/ S ?.d/l?/
*.•/ I/ .07 S.J/ 3/ .0* •».§/ 3/ .07 b.l/ 3/ .y
1U.7/ */ 1* l.bC */ * IS.)/ */ IS ?,!./ 2/
i. if «/ i i.i/ «/ i 1. 1/ z/ i i.ii/ i/
b.*l 10. 3" H. 10 lU.Jk
71 1 IS t
*U I* »5 HI
1.'7 1.2^ LSI l.*u
*.$» 1.* }
VEHICLE MODEL '• CMCV NALIBU C*L
EN6INC f.u L(10f CIO) V*l
UST HUM0CR
TEST CKLE
PVM - ui ssr vEnic
E CHISSIONS efsucTS - aiCM ecsr ion.
TEST MEJbhT l&R* Mft( 3SCO LfS)
GASOLINE EM-]**
TEMPEMATURE OEC. c (DEC. ')
«CL*It*€ HUHtOMV, PCT
RUN Tine. 9ECUNQ3
0LO«CR OIF P MM. MfOUM.
BLO«CR INLET P »*. HIQUN
0LO»ER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOll 3tO. CU. M
CO SAMPLE METER/RAN6C/PPM
coj SAHPLE •*TER/NAI.G£/PCI
CO* BCNORO «ETER/HAfeCE/PCT
MC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPt
CO
NOI MASS CftAMS
O'C, -El (DRY)
3CF, -IT (DRV)
vOL OCN)
KM (MEASURED)
IE9' NUHBfR,
•••QMETER,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULfUR,
fUEU CON9UHP1ION,
CARBON MONOIIOf,
DEC C
OEC C
«0". * (
^s.
#1.
i*
2.
H
».07
.««} ( .US)
1.000 ( .«»»)
3. si
70S
2*OSKM( 1170MILE9)
? - 1 • 1
«*.« / 7fc.O
73*.b (2*.It)
7bb
i.a (30.0)
*.D (30.D)
•».* (UJ.D)
ftlbil
5.1 (*0b*.h)
.b/ f/ ?b
.?/ i/ ZD
.3/11/ •?
,*/U/ 3
*O. 1
.bO
S.bO
S017.1
• .31
.•11 ( .111)
i.nuO ( .*.**)
11S.1
lb.1*
131-31
73*. b
I.I
*».*
*J . IS
i .t;
E-28
-------
TABlf E-28. TEST 132 01ISSIOKS RESULTS
TIM «0. 13*-11 HUN r
HC &C*
co s»i
CO 1C "
"6TER/«*NU€/PCT
l_Ut IUH FfcC.TUH
CO CONCf KtflMIUN PPM
cu? CitNCiKfR*rijn per
CO 5a*H3/*H
CO? GRAHS/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION 8V C9 L/IO'IKH
C»f*
OeG. C
l>*«. C
Ot-C. MET (DMV)
3Lf, -ET ID»V>
VUL (SCMl
KN (*fASUHCO)
COtPOMTC RESULTS
1E8T NUMBER 112-11
"U«ioiTY G/m; -in.it
ftHpfBATiint OEt C 21.7
n*TE 7/21/78
HtC CA4T 10. l
DVNO >tO. 1
CV9 MO. 2
OHV BULH fE«P. 21.7 OtC C(71.0 OCC F>
*«S. HUM(uni \U.U i«/«G
*I.TU*L **0»0 LOAD t.H «»( IP.7 H
fi*SULlNt t«-J»»
OUONtTER kllS KH( i«l( HlttS)
COLO TRAM^[(:NT
7 ".7 (JO.S)
l.H/ IX .Ok
II. I/ 2/ 21
2't.l
9.**
*l t.b
lt.lt
SOS
77».7 00. S)
7?».7 (10.i)
42.O/ i/ 14
l*.o/U/ 1
.10
-as
»OJ nontoiiv
HUT rtttMsiE.")
"».? (in.§)
lu.n/ ?/ 10
2«.i/i3/ 23
C4-B01* O
CAM^OH MJM
HI IOCS Of
.k2
i.^0
«.»*
.11
470.1
Ib.U
SOS
&.10
I UN FACTU^
at*t*uutu
77*.7 (3U.5)
t 9 . 3 1110 . II)
.if i/ 1
. Wl 3/
.u/ i/ 1.1
.i/ 3/ .11
.-»/ I/ I
11 .VU
l.i
10.
17.»
j.
MUDtL II rHCV.MAl.IAu COL
s..i tons CIO) v-«
vChlCLC •'U.
HEl »?1 Vf «U-*IOI TV, PCT
PARONE'F"- "" «G(IN NG)
HLOHE» I"L£T TEMP. utG, L(OtC.
CU
CO?
CO? CO*»Ct«.IM»T10N
>7*.7 (Jfl.S)
77V? O
I. '17
?»».> t JO. SI
* 1 . 1 ( 1 1 " . 0 )
fcl 370
US.O (VQH4.2)
lt.%/ ?/ II
2.0*
10. i
Oft, «ET (DhV)
SCfr -€T (DRV)
V.iL tSC")
UN 11€*»URF.O>
H"«6EH.
7-*?. )
• .*
22. *
11?- I
>»#. 7
^.H
If.h
»1S
OHDES <
. U^
.37
. iS
E-29
-------
TABU E-29. TEST 132 EH1SSIOKS RESULTS
192 FTP VEHICLE CNISSIONI *CftULT3 - ICNlTIDN NI3F1AC
UM MQ. ll»-(V MiH I
VEHICLE NUDFL >• CNEV."*LII*U C»L
ENGIMf i.o LUOS CIO) v-M
DEL* 1 1 VE HUH
HAG «E3uL'3
C T
M. H«0(l". H?U)
nn. *<40( 1* . "i^ )
F*. OEG. C(OtG.
BLO-EM IHtET I
•LOME* riCvULU I
CV3 FLU* STD. Cu. HET»tS(SCM
HC 8Or.HO Mfc Cft/RANtC/PPM
CO SAMPLE Ht e»/B*.»GE/PP*
CO?
MUI »oG"o ••titit
DlLUtIUN *«CTO«
NEA9UHE DIS AMCfc
Of . «f (Qwr
3C , «E (OHV
»U (SC I
KM (IE sutto
vEMtCLC *a.
BAG CANT *«o.
DTHO NO.
CV3 NO.
D»T HULS TEM.P
1
774.7 (30.5)
»7».» CJ0.5)
<).) ( 110.0)
»07«1
»3. / )/ h30
1. / J/ 1
10, / J/ '1
. / 3/
J. / */ .0
21. / ?/ 2
1. / ?/
7.20
bit
b71
l.bf
27. *
2>.«1
%*.IS
2J«l.b
«.07
*.IO
10. *•
»ll.l
. 71
!•.«•
SOS
* . '*
3^«
b*4
«.71
1)
1
1
2
M.7 OEG C(71.0 DEC F)
2
*. (30. S)
*. CJO.S)
3. (110.0)
4^43
2/ 1
£/ 1
. ll/ 1
. 13/
*. )/ rO
11. 2/ t
* *'
1.1*
as
3
l.U
M.I
1.1
2b?i.
«.s
.1
.0
»»0.
, 7
il.l
• b7
J.* J
bit
70*
b.07
T(3T ttCItHT
GASOLINE EN-
ODOMEfEft b*
3
HOT TNAN3ICNT
771.7 (10. S)
77*. 7 (10. t)
«1.3 C110.0)
11
FUEL CONSUMPTION
MYD*OCAf»flON3 (THC)
OHOCS OF WITflOGfcN
L/100KN
G/KM
C/KH
ZOb.4
11.19
1-tAC
*12. 1
17. IS
l.il
2. Jk
.10
CI-BAC)
( »U7.1)
( 17.72)
( 1.21)
( 2. It)
( .70)
U? SflT WEHICCE ENIS3IUH1 flESUtTS - IGNITION M13F1RC
MOJECT U-<*?71-001
ENGINE S.tt L(1RS C1L-) v-l
VEntCLE HO,
T*A*)3MI33ION A3
CVH inSi KC( 4
TEST NCICHT 1SII KG( 3500 L83)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD ».o KH( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE CH-JM
QAfC
OO
C'CLt
MUM0EA
^ * i - »
J. I
1. (?S
31.3
7*).' (2^
rtLD"fM INtfT lt-». Utt. L(D(G. F)
HLO*l* RFKOLUI 10SS
CU
CUf
CO!
cor CONCENTRATION PCT
17*. (30.S)
77*. ( 0.5)
*1. ( 10.0)
1 22 U
210. **!.*)
If. 3t
10. I
bl. I «
2. I
»1. 1.1
1 . .0
21. 2
77^.7 tJO.S)
7'«.7 (JO. 5)
%«.« (112.0)
hl*7t
11S.2 C*0k7.h)
27. fc/ 2/ ?|
10. JX */ 10
3I.I/I9/ 10
i.t/li/ 1
*•.*/ n 2.1*
CO "»»i» fc«*«3
CO* **99 I*"*'1 5
N(JI Ni33 GHAMy
DfC, <«ET (ON*)
SCF, -El
-------
TABli E-30. TEST 132 EMISSIONS RESULTS
rtii NO. ts#-Ji RUN i
ViHlCLl HUUtL 51 CHCv.WAl.lBO
CNCINf S.U LOOS CIO) V.«
PLO-EM MEVULl'TlUNS
cv$ FLUM ato. cu.
CO?
HOX
HC COICENTOATIQN PPN
CU CO"CtNTi»»TIoN PP«
cu* CO*CF.MWAUON PCT
NO! CONCENTDATIQN PPH
HC "*33 GHOH9
CO «»53 CR*«3
CO* "*5S CM*MS
CO*
NOl
HE* SUH to DlStANCfc
0*C. mil (Off)
3CV», MCI tURV)
VUC CSCf)
KM (Ne*sunto)
G. C
t. c
MM HC ^S.ll
6/RU' IU.M
DE6 C 2J.K
p*ojtci u-on-Mi
VEHICLE NO. i»
OAK •/ 7/7S
8AC CART NO. 1
?«V- I
I
COLO THAmiENI
711.1 (11. i)
711.1 (11.5)
11.7 (107.0)
10115
77. t (1711.5)
It. I/ ]/ 151
10. I/ )/ 711
.S/ I/ 11
I.I/ I/ ,07
l.t/ 11 I
k.11
111
kkl
1. 75
1*«7
1«.75
K.01
Mil. 5
1.10
1.10
10.15
115.1
.71
11.11
50k
1.50
11k
k15
t.H
.111
1.000
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR «C/«« 17
1
STA01L1ZEO
711.1 (11.5)
711.1 (11.5)
11.1 (100.0)
klkll
111.7 (IktO.l)
lO.k/11/ 10
l.k/ ]/ .07
I.I/ I/ 1
11.11
j,
f
1.11
11. •
I.k7
.00
1M7.1
i. 7k
.17
.11
110.0
.7k
11.11
• kk
t.10
kll
kll
k.17
• .074)
; .171)
1O1. 1
11.11
0>IDE> OF
CAIOL1NE En-Ill
«0> NUKIOITY CUHmCUO" FACTO* 1
HOT TNANSUNT
Iil.l (11.1)
711. J (11. «)
il.l (110.0)
IQhik
7k. 1 (1711.1)
I.7/11/ 0
I.I/ I/ .07
L.I/ I/ I
0.71
SI
It
1.17
11.1
l.fcl
1.11
lOtl.k
1.51
.11
.11
lfl.1
.kl
It. 11
tot
1.10
111
700
t.ll
.101 (
1.000 (
•*ITHOCt» 6/KH
3I10KUED
711.1 (Jl.t)
711.1 (11.1)
11.1 (119.0)
klklt
111.1 (Ikll.l)
11. J/ I/ 11
l.i/ll/ 1
":./ J/ l:J»
i.u/ i/ i
11.70
11
1
1.07
11. t
1.01
.kl
.570.
l.k
.1
.1
111.
.7
17.7
OkO
5.11
kll
711
k.11
,111)
.17t)
101. 1
11.01
1-HS
.Ik (
l.iO (
.71 (
00
li-
io
17
PVH - 13* S»T VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ICMTIJN NtSMRE
PROJECT U-47M-001
t MtiOfL >» C«£V.H»tl9U
t.u Lf ins ClU) v-i
VEHICLE NO. 1)
TRANSMISSION AI
6VH (OS* KCC »Jil L83)
TEST •CISHT itn KC< *sou LHS
ACTUAL ROAD LQAO t.O *•( 10.7
GASOLINE !«-!"»
RUN SUHHCK
DATE
lEMPENAlURt UtQ. C (UEC. F)
HfLMl*r HUNI01TV. PCT
i - 1 - 3
**.• / 71.0
FET
I
I - 1
/ 7k. 0
HLOHER OIF P MM.
H0«t» IflUtl P M
CO; SAMPLE
CO? 8CT,90
HOt «*^»l.e
co
CO?
NO I
T ION PPM
uott **•••
IION PCT
CO -*
CO* **
9CF, -El (OUT)
VOL ti-CH)
KM (>*E*SURtO)
G. F)
TEST
PVMt
Mh Hfi
G/KC
DEC C
TOTAL FuEt. 3ULFUN,
C*TAL*&T A»G. lEMP.* DEC C
CATALYST Ki«. lEMP., DEC C
FUEL CONSUMPTION. L/1UUK
CARHON nQNOIl
OKIOES OF N| T
G/HH
ill. 7 (7*77.1)
10. */ ?/ I
.Ml ( .IJ«)
1.000 ( .47<)
llk.U
*. 7
**.«
E-31
-------
TABU E-31. TEST 133 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEIT NO. 111-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE NODEL >l CMEV MALIIU CAL
ENflNE 1.0 L(10I CIO) v-l
RILATIVE HUNIDITT «i »CT
•AO RESULTS
(AH HUXICR
DESCRIPTION
•LONER OIF P MM. HtOdN. HtO)
ILOMER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FlOtf STO. Cu. HET«E1(SCF)
C0| SANPLE METER/RANGE/FCT
COt ICMGRO METEN/RANGE/PCT
DILUTION FACTOR
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPN
CO MAIS GRAMS
COt MASS GRAMS
NOI MASS CRAMS
COt GRAMS/KM
NOI CRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION IT CA L/IOQKH
•UN TINE SECONDS
ore, «
SCF, »E (ORT)
OL (SC )
H (HE IUREO)
CONPOIIT RESULTS
TEST uNtER 131-11
IAROM 1f» NM HO 71*. S
HUNIOITT C/KC 1.1
TEMPERATURE OEC c 21. k
PROJECT 11-1771-ttl
VEHICLE NO. 11
KG CART NO. 1
OVNO NO. 1
CVI NO. 2
Atl. HUNIOITV
1
COLD TRANSIENT
71k. k (21.0)
71k. k (21.0)
7k. 7 (2710.7)
17.3/11/ S12
I.I/ 3/ ,Dk
l.t/ t/ 1
7. SI
l.kl
lit
l.k
• IS.
It.)
• .SI
t.kl
.Ilk
1.000
TOTAL FUEL SULFU« HG/HN 17
1.1 GH/KS
2
STAIILIZEO
71k. k (21.0)
• i. (no. a>
111. (>k»I. )
7,» 11
k.k I!/
«.1/ I/ .0
I.I/ t' 1
11. »t
1
2
1.10
.11
t.i
.1
.0
•it,
.1
11. k
tn
k.OI
( I'M)
201.1
11.7k
.77 CARION
OXIDES
DirlED
TEST HEIGHT llll KC( 1500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.0 «»( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-111
F)
NOI HUNIOITT CODI
3
NOT TRANSIENT
•1.1 (111.0)
7k. k (270S.*)
Ik.l/ t/ 17
b.o/ If k
11.2/11/ 11
ll!l/ I/ 1.52
S.2/ I/ .01
11. I/ »/ Ik
I.!/ 2/ 1
11
10
.11
.1
1021.
2.0
.0
.1
1SS.
.1
VS. I
sos
1. 17
• 71
kOl
(.71
1.000 (
NONOIIOE C/KN
OF NITROGEN G/NH
CCTION FACTOR ,1<
1
STABILIZED
71k. k (11. 0)
71k. k (11.0)
•1.1 (110. 0)
131.1 («fc!k. )
11. k/ If i
k.°7/ll/
l.l/ll/
bl.l/ }/ 1.1
3.S/ ]/ .0
I.I/ It I
l.l/ i/
11.11
7
t
1.01
'.SO
.11
ilil.0
t.ll
.at
.13
• 07. k
.31
Ikk
i.17
kll
k.ll
.100)
.111)
107.1
11.10
I-IAG (t-iAG)
.11 (
l.'k ( I
.'0 (
.11)
.kl)
• 31]
SIT VEHICLE (MISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-«771-001
VEHICLE MODEL 71 CHEv NAL1BU CAL
ENGINE 1.0 MIOI CIO) V.|
Till MUHBE*
TEST CTCLE
RUN NUH9ER
DITE
OOOMETER
TEMPERATURE DCS. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVE MUH101TT, FCT
RUN IIHE. SECONDS
•LONER OIF » MM. HfO(IM. M2O)
• LONER INLET F MN, HJOUN. HJQ)
•LONE* INLET TEMP. OCC. C(OEC. F)
•LONER REVOLUTIONS
CVS LON SID. CU. ME1RES(9CP)
HC AMPLE METCR/RANCE/PPM
CO
CO
cot
COI
NOI
NOI
HC
cot
o METER/RANCE/PCT
ETEt/RANCE/PPM
NTRATION PPM
OMCENfRATION PCT
ASS CRIMS
CO ASS GRAMS
C02 ASS GRAHS
NOI ".53 GRINS
ore, NET (ORT)
SCr, MCT (DRT)
VOL (SCH)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER. PVHT
•AROH(TE», MM HC
HUNIDITT, C/*C
TENPERATURE, OEG C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, HC/KM
VEHICLE NO. 11
TRANSMISSION Al
8V. tOU >C( tltl Lit)
Ill-It
SET
1
k/21/7R
I • 1 - 3
2i.k / 71.0
• l.k
711.0 (21.21)
mi
71b.k (il.O)
71k.k (21.0)
•1.' (111.0)
112111
211.k (71T1.1)
17.T/ 2/ 11
lt.1/ t/ It
•l.k/ll/ Ik
J.I/I)/ 1
11.tt ]/ l.ll
•.!/ I/ .07
to,*/ ;/ ti
l.k/ t I
I.I
11.
7. 7
70f 7.S
7.11
.Ifl ( .Ml)
i.aot { .in)
lll.k
21. $7
111-12
7**.n
IB.*
21. k
21.11
TEST MIGHT 111! KC( 1100 LtS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAO I.D «.< 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE CD-Ill
111-11
HPCT
k/ei/7i
)1Ik«M( {•IIMRES)
2-1-1
Ik. 7 / 10.0
• ».l
7«».0 (21.21)
771
71k. k (II. 0)
79k. k (21.0)
•3.1 (111.0)
k22«S
117.1 (111k. 7)
Ik. I/ t/
lt.1/13/
2.1/11/
!.»/ 2/
11.I/ 2/
I.I/ I
2.1
11.
1.
•kOl.l
7.2k
.Ilk ( .121)
l.tOQ < ,17t)
117. t
Ik. 11
111-11
71»,0
1.1
2k. 7
CARiON 0101 IDE,
FUEt CONSUMPTION,
CARION MONOIIOE,
OI1DCS OF H1THOGEH,
kll
127.2
M.Ofl
.0*
.17
. Ik
E-32
1.21
k21
701
ttl.1
It. Ok
.01
.27
.11
-------
TEM NO. 11I-J1 HUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL >s CHCv.mi.igu CAL
ENSINE «.o L(I05 CIO) V-l
BAROMETER HI. ht MM HC(|*.tn I* HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY f« PCT
BAG RESULTS
IIS NU««E«
DESCRIPTION
P.LOMER Olf P MM. NIOCIN. HtO)
BLONER INLET P MM. HtOClN. HtQ)
BIOMER 1HLIT Tf"P. DIG. CCOE6. P)
SLOMER REVOLUTIONS
09 'LOM 9TO. CU. HETRES(9CP>
MC SAMPLE "ETES^ANCE/PPM
HC 9CKGRD NETER/RANGE/PPM
CO 9ANPLE NETER/RAN6E/PP"
CO SCKCRD METBR/RANSE/PPN
COt SAMPLE NETER'RANCE/PCT
• cot «CKORO HETER/RANCS/PCT
NOI P.CKGRO NETER/RANSE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
MC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
M01 CONCENTRATION PPN
MC MASS GRAH3
CO MAIS CRAMS
COt MA9S CRAMS
M01 MASS 6RAMS
«c
CO
CRAMS/KM
CRAMS/*H
NOX CRANS/KM
'UEL CONSUMPTION »t CB L/lOOtH
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVC. E>H. aniCEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. OE6. C
CATALYST MAI. IENP. Ott. C
MCASURCO OISTANCC KM
DPC, «ET (DRY)
9CP, »BT (DRY)
VOL (9CM)
«M (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMIER 111-11
MAP.OMETCR MM MC 7»l. ?
HUMIDITY C/KC 1O.Q
TEMPERATURE DEC C II.]
TABLE E-32. TEST 133 EMISSIONS RESULTS
111 PTP VEHICLE ENISBIDNB RESULTS - DISA1LEO EM
PROJECT 1I-»H-0<1
VEHICLE NO. 11
DATE 7/K/7I
BAC CART NO. 1
DTNO NO. 1
CVS NO. t
ORT BULB TEMP. »l,1 OCC C(7«.0 OE6 P)
ABB. HUMIDITY 10.0 CM/>C
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
CASOLINC EN-3X
ODOMETER vtTl K
NOI HUMIDITY CORRECTION PACTOP. .«•
COLD TRANSIENT
JVI.O (10.0)
JH.O (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
'kt.O (10.0)
7kt.O (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
HOT TRANSIENT
>fct.O (10.0)
>Wi.o (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
STABILIZED
JH.O (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
Yk.S
70. I/
..»/
.»/
(27
2/
I/
2/
]/
0.4}
'0
*
21
.07
1
130
11.
f .
IS.
2,
I.
.S (4kOt.
;/ 1', i
'/I!/ 1
I/ 2/ .0
4/ /
/ e/ .0
/ i
12. 1
1.70
1S.M
SOb
•*,>•
.Of
.Of
lbt.0
i.oi
*«.*
.•7
{004.7
11. Ik
.0*
.0»
*4. >
SOS
S.k7
1.000 ( .«>•)
SULFUR MG/NN
CAT&LVtT AVG, TCHP. OC6 C
CATALYST MAX. TC«». DCG c
CAftBOM NONOKtDC
OXIOI9 Of NITffOC
k.k
.0
310.
1.0
Ik.2
It!
( 11.b
t .1
( l.S
VfHICLE NDOet. 7P CH€«.HALI§U CAL
EN6INC «.u KJOS CIO) v-t
TC9T HUM SCR
TtSI C»CL£
DUN »U*6tft
CVS - BAG CA»T - DtNAMOMC
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (OE6.
RELATIVE HUMlDITV. PCT
BAHO«e'e», HM HG(lN HQ)
RUN TlfC, SECONDS
(*tOttE« OIF P *•»•. MiQdM.
CO
CO
C0i»
HOY ftCKGMD »tltlt/<»*N«
MC COI*CF*< TO t TloM PPM
CO CONCO-TRATION PPH
COI COMCCMfUllON PCT
MOI CO*>C(I.T.*ATIOM "M
co "la a t«dns
cn«? it »s c*A*«a
WO* ».,ft8 CRAi*3
Ol*C. -t€T (QHT)
SCrr wCT (DRY)
VOL (9CM)
KM (HfiSUBeO)
TOTAL '"EL SULFUR.
CATALfST AVC. TEMP., OtC C
C»TJ»LTST «••«. TCMP.. ore c
CARSON DIOXIDE, C/HM
rUfL CONSUMPTION* t/IOOKH
HTDROCARSONS.
OXIDES Of MM
S/NM
G/MM
PROJECT 11-*7T1-OQ1
TRANSMISSION Al
7k«.0 OO.O)
7k2.0 OO.O)
*1.3 (110.0)
112004
204. b (7401.4)
tO.k/ «/ 11
b.Q/ «/ b
I.4/I1X 4
kl
l.S/ )/ .OS
|4.k/ i/ IS
2.1/ I/ 2
kBOi. 7
11. kl
.l«0 ( .t14)
l.UOO ( ,47«)
204.. k
It. It
111-22
J40.4
4.2
2*..7
2S.22
klO
27«.k
11. "
.01
.Ok
TEST "EIGHT m
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
o u»s>
10.' «P
* - I - 2
2k.1 / 74.0
40.k
7*1.* (24,22)
7kk
•12.i (J2.0)
ffll.C (12.0)
M.I (110.0)
k!4f4
114.« (4Q44.k)
12.I/ 2/ It
b.S/ 2/ 7
4.4/1J/ 4
I.S/11/ 2
42.2/ t/ l.lf
1.4/ 2/ .07
4b.7/ I/ 140
.!/ I/ 1
]'**.•
tB.kk
.Btl ( .Itk)
l.OBO ( .<»)
U«.«
742.2
1.7
2k. 1
20. 41
4.4fc
224. i
4. 74
.01
,n?
1.74
E-53
-------
TABU £-33. TEST 133 EMISSIONS RESULTS
III FTF> VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS • DISABLED
PROJCCT 11-4771-001
TEtT NO. llt-11 RUN I
RANSMISSION A3
*C RESULTS
1*6 NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
SLONER INLCT TEMP. OEC. crocc. FJ
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENT*. TIQM PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
CO 1I1S CRAMS
HC CRAHS/MM
CO CRAMS/KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE <>!
BAROMETER. MM N6
MUMIDITr, C/KC
TEMPERATURE, OE5 C
TOTAL 'UEL SUL'UR, M5/««
CARBON DIOMDE> C/KM
H»0"OCAR«01», C/"-
oiIDES 0' NITRQCEM, C/MH
11NICI.E NO. L
DATE »/!!/>•
BAC CART NO. 1
OTNO NO. r
CVI NO. 1
OUT BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUHiom
t
COLO TRANSIENT
717.4 (11.0)
717.4 (11. 0)
•1.1 (110. 0)
41117
I.I/ If J
»1. »/ I/ SM
l.S/ I/ 14
35. k/ {/ l.SJ
l.B/ tX .07
1.7/
t.Sl
70
4Bt
41. 4S
.SI
7.JI
1 .hb
K.71
SOI
4.kO
JIJ
4R7
lIlOB
"OJtCT 11
VEHICLE NO.
TRANSMISSION
Ill-It
SET
7/11/70
I - 1 - I
»1.4 / 7».a
40.4
742.2 (14. tl)
1147
7R7.4 (11.0)
7R7.4 (11. 0)
41.1 (lle.O)
lltbOS
JIO.S (7M».»
11. O/ >/ 13
I.O/ ?/ •
ll.l/ll/ It
h.1/11/ h
IS. I/ !/ l.(l
4.S/ I/ .07
74. k/ ?/ 10
2. I/ 2/ 2
b
t
1.S1
77. b
.71
1.29
1114. t
21.41
.III ( ,17k)
l.BOO { .474.)
110. I
11. kS
111-31
7.7
21.4
t.ls
S12
kOt
»k4.7
11. $2
.03
.Ok
1.31
1 TC»1 «E1SHT 1511 «C( ISOO LI
CASOLINC EN-1»
12.2 DEC C(72.0 DEC F)
4.1 CM/«e MOX HUMIDITY co«
i i
STABILIZED HOT TRANSIENT
317.4 (11.0) 717.4 (1J.O)
717.4 (11.0) 717.4 (11.0)
41.1 (110.0) "3.3 (110.0)
70121 40510
7.2/ 2/ T f.b/ if k
'1.0/13/ 20 12.1/11/ 12
2.Z/ It .01 l.^/ if .07
1.7/ it 1 1.4/ 2/ 1
ll.lk lO.Ofc
1 4
.44 1.27
•7.1 kt.4
.2 .40
.2 .11
J2H. 17S7.1
k.k 4.2k
.0 .07
.0 .Ob
IbS. 104.0
1.0 l.kO
Ibb SOS
S.40 S.fl
4S7 401
44R Sll
k.14 S.7I
( .•«!) .411 (
( .477) 1.000 (
11.41
.41 CARBON DIOXIDE G/KH
414 HYDROCARBONS (TNC) C/NH
S12 CARBON NONOX10E G/KN
OXIDES Of NITROCCN C/KH
-4771-001
11 TEST «tISMT
1)
IECTION FACTOR .47
4
STABILIZED
717.4 (11.0)
717.4 (Sl.O)
41.1 (110. n)
u!'/lJ/ 1
2l!7/ if .4
i.tf if .0
21. If if 1
l.l/ If
14.04
2
.11
<4,2
• 10
2017. k
1.12
.OS
.Oh
111.7
.44
14.47
Ik7
III
k.U
.407)
201. k
11.44
3-SAC
llb.l
l.kO
1S1B «C( ISOO
(4-IAC)
( 111.1)
< 14. S7>
( .IS)
( l.bO)
( 1.10)
LBS)
.7 HP)
«SI1 LBS) CABOLINE EM-|44
111-11
HFET
1
7/11/7B / /
2-1-1
(b.l / 74.0
41.7
742.2 (24. <»
7kt
100.1 (11. »
•00.1 (11. 1>
41.1 (110.0)
blb27
.It If 7
.«/!!/ 7
.l/ll/ 1
.7/ 2/ .Ob
,4/ I/ 4
b
4
1.10
140.4
.42
374*. 1
2N.b4
lIoOO ( ^471)
llf .0
111-11
742.2
4.4
2k. 1
21.20
<42
211. b
4-. 14
.01
1.11
-------
TABU E-34. TEST 135 EH1SSIOKS RESULTS
PVM - 111 FTP VEHICLE EMISSION! RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT U-»»l-IOl
H»l MO. llt-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL II CHK.iill.llu CAL
ENGINE <.D 1.1101 CID) V-l
TRANSMISSION Al
BVM ;01» «G( Mil IBS)
RELATIVE HUMIOITV ti ret
VEHICLE «0. 11
•AC CART NO. 1
OTNO NO. 1
CVS NO. >
DRY BULB TEMP. Jt.J DEC C(7I.O OES ')
AM. HUMIDITY 10.• SN/«C
TESI "EIGHT l
ACTUAL ftOAO LO*D
CAROLINE EM-1V4
ODONETER Ilk' «"(
»C( 1100 I.M)
1.0 K»( 10,1 np
NILEI)
NOI NUHIOlTf CONRICTIOM VACfOM
en
DESCRIPTION
(LONER OIF P in. HfOdN. 110)
P.LONER IW.ET P MM. HiO(lH. Hio)
OLOHER INLET TEMP. Dec. C(occ. f)
•LOMER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLON STO. CU, "ETREKSCf)
MC SAMPLE. MerE«v«»NGC>«M
NC BCKCRD NETER/RANGE/PPH
co SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
co «C«CRO NETER/RANGE/PPM
CQl SAMPLE HETER/HANGE/PCT
CO; 6CKCRO NETER/RANCE/PCT
101 SAMPLE NeTER/RANGE/PPM
not ICMCRO METER/RANGE/PPM
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COi CONCENTRATION PCT
MOV CONCENTRATION PPM
HC "ASS CRAMS
CO "ASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/HH
CO 6RAH3/NN
CO; GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAHS/KN
RUN IIM(
AVC. EIH.
OltClM
SECONDS
PCRCCilT
OEC. C
OEC. C
CAIALTST MAI. TEMP.
MEASURED DISTANCE *M
DFC. MET (DRY)
SCF. M6T (ORY)
VOL (9CN)
«H (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST MUMREM llt-1)
BAROMETER MM H6 7*».7
NUNIDITV G/RG 10.•
TEMPERATURE OEG C I!.I
1
COLO TRANSIENT
7ki.o (10.0)
7k). 0 (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
7k. k (i70V,7)
11. I/ tt 1)
.]/ ]/ 7
!.•/ ]/ .Ok
!>.•/ tt 11
.11 ^l i
71
• •1
t.kk
17.1
1.11
71.11
».tl
.<•
11. Uk
• 0*. 1
.•1
11.10
lot
• . •!
117
lie
1.77
.••7
1.000
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KN i
CATALYST'
CATALYST
AVC. TEMP. OEG C
MAI. TEMP. DEC C
i
STABILIZE?
'ki.O (10.0)
Iki.O (10.0)
•1.1 (110.0)
111.1 (kklk.O)
11. O/ tt 11
». t\tt 1
*!• f ]' i « ll
*. / J/ .«•
*. / if *
. / J tt
It. k
1.0
1.
. I
. I
**!**
.0'
.1*
• t».t
. i*
.?.•»
•to
$. JJ
SM
*M
h.lf
( .If*)
( < "* )
«?.!
11.1%
*.*• C»»ftOM
1
HOT IH»N$ltHT
>(>«.0 (10.0)
?kl.0 (30.0)
«).3 (110.0)
»0701
U.W 2/ 1
'iIwuJ
«.«/ 3/ .0
u. ^/ a/ i
.»>/ i/
*.!»
IB
JO
1*^0
U.»
.»*
1.10
1 l.«
.01
.91
1*»* . h
. 3*
l*.ht
tOk
* * so
1*b
itl
S.'S
.MO (
I. 000 (
DlOMDt (*/Nn
»tl HTO»OC**IO*.S (THC) C/KM
S^J CA*ftl>M
OX1&C9
HOMO II DC 6/NH
•>
>TA|U1ZIO
7fc«>. (10. 0}
?•>*. (30.0)
*i. ciio.o)
n».' */ i
ia.i */ i
i!u ij/
*.*/ >/ .•
•.'/ )
tOI.'
11. l»
»-•*&
1*1. •
]*>
«.••
.17
)
(«>-•*
3II».
l*>. 7
.1
I.I
.1
SIT VEHICLE EMISSION* RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
• 10JIC1 11-'?>1-»1
VEHICLE MUOEL 71 CHEv.HALIBU CAL
ENGINE S.» LtlOi CIO) V-l
Tear NUNBER
TEST C'CLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
OOOMCTER
TEMPERATURE OEG. C (DEC. F)
MAROXE'ER, MH HGUN MG)
RUN TIME. SECONDS
ILOMER OIF P MM. MJO(1M. HJO)
BLO»ER REVOLUTION]
CVS PLOD STO. CU. M(TRES(SCF)
MC 8CKCRD METERXRANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO ICKGRD MErER/RANGE/PPM
coi SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COr IC«CRD METFR/IANGe/PCT
NOX SAMPLC MCTfR/RANGC/PPM
NOX BCKCRO MeTER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION 'PM
COI tUNCENTRAIION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
NOI MASS GRAMS
MC. »ET (DR»
SCF. MET (OR")
VOL OCH)
UN (NEASUREO)
TEST MUNeeR*
BAROMC1ER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
PVMT
MM HG
C/KG
OEG C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, HG/KM
AVG. EIH. OIYGEN.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS.
CARBON NONOIIOE,
OIIOES OF NITROGEN,
PCT
OEG C
DEC C
C/KN
I/KM
G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 11
TRANSMISSION Al
lli-lt
SET
l/il/71
I9H
Ill-It
7*1.1
1.1
kOl
700
lll.t
ll.il
MFET
1
I/91/7I
»I1«M( K«
« • 1 • 1
>•!.! (tk.li)
>kk
>ki.O (10.0)
7ki.O (10.0)
• !.•> Ull.O)
Ik. II it
11. k' I/
il.l/11/
l.l'll/
l.k' it
1B.4/ I/
.•/ tt
k
II
!.••
10.1
.•1
I.M
• IK. I
k.OI
Ik.K
1U-11
ll.kkl
• . 17
K'.k
11.01
.01
. II
.11
II
Ik
1
. 01
.«k
11
1
E-35
-------
TABLE E-35. TEST 135 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ut nr VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS • no AIP. !»J.
PROJECT U.4771'001
TEST MO. 119-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 71 CHCV.NALIP.U CAL
ENGINE 1.0 Ldflt CIO) V.I
TRANSMISSION II
BAROMETER 741.44 MM M6(I4.I1 IN MS)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ki PCT
BAG RESULTS
Big NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
SLOUCH OIF P "». MiodM. HJO)
atone* INLET R MM. utofiN. Hio)
SLOBER INLET TEMP. DCS. C(OEG. F)
BLONER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLON JTO'. CU'. METRES(SCP)
HC SAMPLE MfTER/RANGE/PPM
MC BCKGRO METER/RANGC/PPM
CO SAMPLE M-TER/RANGE/PPM
CO SCKORO MEYER/RANGE/PPM
COI SAMPLE METEP/RANGE/PCT
COf BCNGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
KOI Boom) METER/RANSE/PRM
DILUTION -ACTOP.
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION I>CT
NOX CONCENTRATION MM
HC MA8S ORAMS
CO MAB9 GRAMS
CO} MASS GRAMS
N0> MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
COI GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/inoKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVO. CXH'. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALTST AVO' TEMP. OEG. C
CATALTST MAX'. TEMP. OEG. C
MEASURID DISTANCE KM
OFC. KCT (ORr)
SCP. HET IORT)
VOL (SCM)
«IltJ)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1,01
TOTAL FUEL
AVG. EXH. 0
1
COLO TRANSIENT
7*4.3 (•«.:)
>««.] (»<•»
*!.] (110.0)
«07tl
Ik.k O70S.11
II. I/ t' III
l.t/ M Ik
.«/ t/ If
«,J/ I/ .07
11. »/ tl 11
l.O/ I/ 1
'.11
1«7
»»71
l.»!
!».'
B.71
10'. 7»
I007.fl
I.U
1.11
5J.H
1»7.7
.1'
IB.b*
<0>
.>!
Ml
1*9
(.77
.SO
1.000
SULFUR MG/KM 11
IYOEN PCT
CATALYST Mix. TEMP. OEG C
I
STABILIZED
7««.l
7»R.l (I'.l)
•I.J (110.0)
KIM
111.1 (»k»l,l)
11. I/ I/ 191
l.l/ I/ 11
.»/ «/ IS
l.k/ ]/ ,0k
b.l/ t/ k
.•/ tl 1
11.04
111
ISSI
,B«
I.'
•.•1
Hl.«»
1114.1
1.10
1.17
kl.kl
117. S
.»
!«.»»
Bk7
.It
• kl
SOI
k.lk
( .110)
( ,«7k)
101. 0
11.41
1
HOT TRANSIENT
7»4.1 (J4.S)
7»4,1 (»4,t>
•1.1 (110.0)
1071<
7k. k (1701. S)
11. It }/ 112
l.l/ I/ 11
.!/ It 11
t.S/ I/ .07
11. '/ I/ It
,f/ t/ 1
1.4k
100
Il<7
l.tl
11.1
'«'*
114.71
Ik4t.l
l.kk
.77
11.41
(4>.i
.(4
I'.ll
IDS
1.10
• 04
ttt
1.7k
.'OS
1.000
,«] CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
*17 HYDROCARBONS CTHC) G/KM
til CARBON HONOXIOE G/KH
OXIDES
Or NITROGEN G/«M
•
STABILIZED
7«4.I (14. S)
744.1 (E4.S)
•1.9 (110.0)
k4kkk
111,0 (»kfk.7
11, I/ ]/ 111
l.l/ I/ 11
SO 7/ tl 1417
,Cfi. C (OtG. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER. «M HG(IN KG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOHER OIF P «M. MFOIIN. H»o)
BLONCR INLET P MM. MfOCIN. M*o)
BLO»CR INLET TC"P. OEO. C(OCG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOII STD. CU. "ETPES(SCF)
MC SAMPLE MFTCR/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKORO MfTER/RANGC/PPM
co SAMPLE METCR/RANGE/PPM
co BCKQRD METCR/RANGE/PPM
coi SAMPLE MCTER/RANCC/PCT
coi BC«ORO METEP/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLf MrTfR/RANGE/PPM
NOX BC«ORO M>YER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCCNTRlTION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS CRAMS
CO MASS ORAMS
COI MISS CRAMS
NOX MAIS G°AMS
OFC. «ET (DRY)
ICF. NET (DRY)
VOL (9CM)
«« (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
IAROMCTER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR.
PVMT
MM HG
G/«G
DEG C
MG/KM
AVG, EXM'. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST IVG' TEMP., DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDC. G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KH
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. 'G/KM
OXIDCI OF N1YROGEN, G/KM
119.19
HFET
1
1/19/71
•llkKM( 91IIMILE9)
I • t - 1
It.I / 71.0
11.4
741.1 (14.11)
7kk
744.1 (14.9)
744.1 (14.9)
11.4 (111.0)
kllll
llk.l (1101.7)
41 I/ I/ 41
4 I/ I/ 4
14 I/ I/ 1117
I/ !/
SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11*4771.001
VEHICLE NO, 11
TRANSMISSION A]
GVM 1091 K5( 4«t9 LBS)
119-11
BET
1
8/I1/7B
I774«M( 9499MILES)
1-1-1
11.1 / 71.0
711.1 (10.II)
1147
741.1 (14.9)
741.1 (14,9)
49,4 (111,P)
111911
111.1 (71kt.l)
4,7/ 9/ 47
l.O/ I/ 10
.I/ tl 19
II.I/ !/ 1.99 11 9/ !/ 1.41
l.l/ I/ .Ok 1 I/ tl ,0'
11.7/ II 19 14 tl tl 14
.«/ I/ 1 9/1/1
II 40
1191- 1141
1.90 1.17
14.0 11.4
10.77 I.k4
910,11 199.14
9107.4 9474.4
9.17 9.10
,lk7 { ,R94) 147 ( ,841)
1,000 ( ,47k) 1,000 ( .479)
111.4 llk.l
11.7k Ik.II
119-11 199-11
711,1 711,1
1.1 '.k
It.t 11.1
II.Ok 19.II
.kl .91
191 kO«
kkl kkl
lkk.1 144.1
19.04 11.11
.44 .17
14.17 4.9k
.14 .11
TEST HEIGHT 1911 KG( 1500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD l.O «»( 10,7 HP)
GABOLINE EM.Ill
E-36
-------
TABLE E-36.
•V" > 111 fTP
TEST 133 EMISSIONS RESULTS
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS • NO AIR 1NJ. • R.B.t,
PROJECT 11-»771«OI)I
TtST NO. 131-11 "UN 1
VEHICLE "OOEL 'B CHCV.Mti.18U CAL
ENGINE 5.0 L(301 CIO) V.I
TRANSMISSION A3
evil io« KG< *129 US)
IAROMETER 7*9.20 »« HG(24.2b III MO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY it PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG «J«8f»
DESCRIPTION
BLO»ER OIF ' "M. H2odN, HIO)
BLO»ER INLET • MM. M20(IN. H20I
tune* INLET TEMP, oft. c(oto. •>
BLONER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW 9TO. CU. NETRE8(8CF)
MC SAMPLE MfTER/RANOE/PPM
MC BC>0»> METER/RANGE/I>P»
co SAMPLE METBR/RANGE/PPM
co BOGBO METER/RANGE/PP"
CQ( SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
cot BCKgao METER/RANOE/PCT
NO> SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PP"
NOX 8CKCRO METER/RANOE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO! CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAM*
CO! MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS OR*WS
HC ORAMJ/KM
CO CRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX BRAMS/KM
'till. CONSUMPTION 1Y CB L/IOOKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVO, CXN*. OXVOEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG, TCMP, DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE «»
OFC. «ET (DRY)
St.'. NET (DRY)
VOL fSCM)
,"M {MEASURED)
COHPOSITB PE9UI.TS
TEST NUMRtR • 1J5-1I
BAROMCTCR MM HG T«9.2
HUMIDITY 0/10 «.J
TEMPERATURE OEO C tl.»
VEHICLE NO. II
DATE I/H/JI
BAO CART NO. 1
DYNO NO, 9
CVS NO. t
DRY BULB TE»P. M.> OEO C(71.0 OEO ')
ASS. HUMIDITY 4.1 0»/«0
TEST HEIOXT 1ISI KOI 1SOO IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD S.O KN( 10.Y HP)
GASOLINE EH-1*«
ODOMETER IMO KM( 5»«J MILES)
N0» MUMIOITY CORRECTIONtFACTOR
COLO TRANSIENT
HOT TRANSIENT
TOTAL FU
AVG. EXH
CATALYST
CATALYST
>bl,0 (90,0)
'bi.O (90.0).
49.9 (110.0)
7b.7 (2704.4)
til/ 3/ 19
71. 2/ 2/ 9889
,2/ 2/ 8
81. I/ I/ l.»4
«.!/ I/ .07
15. b/ t/ Ib
.I/ 2/ 0
7.11
917
9t43
11.3
324^41
2013. b
2.11
I.b7
l'|»7
110,7
.3'
14,01
SOb
.b!
218
»44
S.7*
.841
1.000
EL SULFUR MG/KM 91
. OXYGEN pCT
AVG, TEMP. DEC C
"AX. TEHP. DEG C
'b2.0 (90.0)
'b2.0 (90.0)
49,9 (110.0)
b4b44
131,0 (»b2S, )
I,*/ 3/ 1
51. I/ 11 Ib*
.)/ 11 1
11, B/ I/ .4
*,4/ 9/ .0
«.'/ I/
.I/ I/
11.10
104
213*
.17
S.I
1,11
98b,SO
2041.8
1.32
1.31
bl.13
3*1.7
• 21
14.00
Sbb
.4*
*72'
108
b.lt
( .881)
( ,478)
207,7
ll.Bt
,04 CARBO
.84 FUEL
7b2.0 (90,0)
7b2.0 (90,0)
*9,9 (110.0)
*080b
7b,7 (2708.7)
l.l/ )/ 11
*3,b/ 2/ 2013
.11 I/ 8
b4,9/ I/ 1.J5
».S/ 9/ ,07
11. */ >' 11
.!/ 2/ 0
4,22
48
1 1421
1.14
11.9
*.9*
171, Ib
lbbS.4
1.14
.7b
24,84
240.7
.28
11.52
501
,49
«01
HI
5.'*
.407 (
1.000 (
N DIOXIDE G/KM
CONSUMPTION L/IOOKM
*29 HYDROCARBONS (THC) C/KM
7b2,0 (90.0)
7b2.0 (90.0)
*3,3 (110,0)
b4710
131,0 (*blb,Sl
10. B/ 3/ 108
l.l/ 3/ 11
»8,S/ 11 1902
,3/ 2/ 11
11. •/ 3/ ,14
S,2/ )/ .08
I.'/ 2/ b
.!/ 2/ 0
11.14
41
2210
.82
».b
'.*o
33'. 1*
14b4,0
1,1*
1.11
51,11
121.4
• 22
17, bO
Ib7
• Sb
*7b
114
b.ll
,!4b)
,474)
107.7
11. Ib
l.BAG
114,1
1'.'7
1.15
«-BAG)
121,7)
17. Ib)
1,21)
50, »2)
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/«»
PVM - 111 SBT
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - NO AIR INJ. • R.B.I.
PROJECT 11-*771-001
VEHICLE MODEL '8 CHEV'.MALIBU CAL
ENGINE 1.0 I.(10! CID) V.8
TEST NUMHF.R
TEST CYCLF
RUN NUHBCP
DATE
ODOMETER
|"OMETER
TEMPERATUPC OEG. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVt MUMIOTTY. PCT
S»»0»STt». »M HG(IN HC)
•UN TIHf, SECONDS
BLOHCR OIF P MM, M20HN. H20)
BLOirCR INtCT P MM. M(0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TF.MP. DEC. c(Deo. F)
BLONER RFVOLUTtONS
CVS FLO* sTO. CU. MJTRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLf MFTF4/RANGE/PPM
HC BC'GRD HtTER/RANGE/PP«
CO SAMPLF MfTER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGPIt MfTFR/RANnE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE MfTeR/RANGC/PCT
C02 BCKORO MFTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PP*
NOX BCKGRO MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 HAAS SPAMS
NOX MASS ORAMS
DFC, »tT (DRY)
SCF. NET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUM»[R,
BAROHETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
PVMT
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
HG/HM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG, TEMp'., DEC C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., OEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE. G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100'M
HYOROCARRONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXTOE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 13
TRANSMISSION A9
OVK 2012 K0( «S23 LBS)
131.32
SET
1
8/24/78
88b4KM( S511MILE8)
2-1-3
2*.* / 7b.O
»S.O
7*3.7 (24.21)
1341
7b2.0 (30.0)
7h2.0 (30.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
111121
211.k (7*71.7)
4.0/ I/ 40
,4/ J/ 4
tl.7/ t/ 2111
,!/ 2/ «
11,!/ I/ 1,11
l.O/ ]/ ,01
15.J/ ;/ IS
.*/ l> 0
|2
20]<
1.9*
11,0
10.09
101.1*
1411,1
S.b4
.Sbb { .814)
1.000 ( .477)
tll.b
21.40
191*99
7*9.7
8.*
2*.*
21. »2
.54
118
b7*
273.3
13.21,
,*b
22,40
,2b
E-37
TEST NCICHT 1981 KG( 9100 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD s,o «»( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM.9M
131.13
HFET
1
8/2»/78
840bKM( I5KMILES)
2-1-1
21.4 / 71,0
*7,7
7*9.7 (24.28)
'bb
7b9.0 (30.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
<3.3 (110.0)
b!7bl
lib.2 (*102.B)
»1.3/ I/ »!
4.3/ 2/ 4
*7.*/ 3/ 1112
.*/ 3/ 4
*3.3/ 2/ 1.41
1.5/ II .01
II.!/ |/ 22
.»/ 2/ 0
37
101*
1.87
22.0
2.11
l*b.bO
3472.8
*.bl
,8*4 ( .841)
1.000 ( ,473)
lib.2
lb.21
131-39
7*3,7
4.0
23.4
23.71
.31
b!7
b78
2**.4
11.0*
4.0*
.28
-------
TA»L£ E-37. TEST Ml EMISSIONS RESULTS
PV« - 111 FTP VEHICLE EHiisioNa KHOI.II . UNMODIFIED
HJt no. lil-ll »W 1
VEHICLE HOOEL VI 'OKO CIANAOA
INIINI 1.' LCIOI CIO) »-•
TRAN9NI9910N 11
OVM 1119 KG( 1k9B 189}
BAROHETER 7»!.|> HH HHlt.lt IN MS)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ii PCT
• « RE9ULT9
BAG NUMBER
DE9CR1PTION
BLOHER DIP * ««. MlOd*. MIO)
•LOME* INLCf • MR. HIOdN. HIO)
BLOMER IMLCT TEMP. OEC. C(OEO. F>
»LOKtn REVOLUTIONB
CVI FLO* ]IO. CU. HETRE9(9CF>
HC 9AMPLE HETER/RAHGE/PPN
HC BCHCRD HETER'RANCE/PPM
CO 9ANFLE METECI/RANCE/PPN
CO SCKGRD HETER/RANGEVPPM
COI SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
COI »C«t«D nETED/RAHCE/PCT
N0» 9ABPLE HETE»/RA»CE/"N
HOX BCK6RO HETER/RANGE/PPN
DILUTION FACTO"
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOR CONCENTRATION ^^N
HC NOI C»N9
CO NA9I 6HAH9
CO 0ttANS/KH
COI 6««»>/«H
'UtL CONSUMPTION «T C» L/100K"
•UN TINC
4*0. CXH. OITfiCN
9ECON09
PCUCCNT
OtC. C
DEC. C
PHOJfCT ll.«
VtHICl-f NO.
DATE I/lb/'l
9AC o»r NO. i
DTNO NO. 1
cva NO. *
TC9T «flSB! Ill'
ACTUAL »OAO LOAD
CA90LINE [N-H1
OOONtTE* 1"' HI
KM( ll.l HP)
ill NILtS)
DBT BULB TCNP.
AB9. HUKIDIM
COLD THAN9KNT
9TAB1LIZED
HOI HUHIOITT CORRECTION FACTOR
HOT TRANSIENT
01SI»NCt
OPC. »€T <0«I)
9CP, «ET (0"')
VOL OCX)
NH (NeA9UREO)
COHP09ITE OC9ULT9
TI9T HUHBEK 111-11
BAMOMETEN HN HC 7tl.I
HUHlOITr G/KC '.1
TCHPCRATURE OCC C If.l
7ki.O (30.0)
712.0 (30.0)
11.1 (111.0)
71.' (lkll.9)
I.'/ 3/ 1'
.11 )/ 1
'.!/ I/ .07
l.O/ II 1
7.7k
Hi
1'$
l.kl
11.9
1.3k
11.71
1111. k
k.71
.'•
7. IB
9R2.9
1.19
Ik."
901
4. as
i)k
917
9.11
• '09 (
1.000 (
7kl. (90.0)
7kl. (10.0)
11. (111.0)
'911
11.1 I/ 1
9.9 ill
!.>/ I/ .0
.'/ I/ 1
11.11
1
19
.'1
II.'
.k
1.0
lilt.
9.k
.1
.1
Ikl.
. '
19.1
Ikk
4.00
1k9
iao
k.10
.Ilk)
.'7')
10k. 0
11.01
7k2.0 (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
11.1 (111.0)
10501
I'.l/ I/ 1'
9.0/11/ 9
>.'/ I/ ,0k
.'/ 11 \
a. is
ik
Ik
1.91
Ik. 7
1.11
3.11
1131.1
9.01
.10
.99
171.3
.1'
19. '9
901
5.50
1'k
kit
9.73
.'01 (
1.000 (
7kl.O (10.
7H.O (10.
'!.' (Ill
k'9k1
11. 7/ 2/
l.k/11/
!.>/ I/
.a/ i/
ii.il
10
11
1.01
11.'
.71
l.kl
1111.9
1.10
.11
.21
3". 5
*B9
17.0'
Bk7
5.75
911
9'7
k.O'
.B'k)
,'79>
109.'
11. ai
0)
0>
.0)
1'
IS
1
• 0'
.Oh
I
TOTAL FUEL 9ULFUR HC/NN 31.11
AVC. EXH. OXYGEN PCT 5.70
CATALYST AVC. TEMP. OEC C 1k7
C1TALY9T HAX. TEMP. OEC C kli
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBON! (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITBJOCIH
G/KM
L/10DKH
C/IIH
C/KH
C/KN
3-BAG
3k'.0
19.'1
.20
i.aa
.'k
(1-BAC)
( lao.u
( Ik.3')
( .10)
( 1.97)
( .«)
VEHICLE HOOEL 7B 'ORO ORANAOA
EHOINE 1.' L(10t CIO) V.f
TE9T NUNBE*
TE9T CTCLE
RUN NUHBER
DATE
ODOMETER
TEHPERATURE DEC. C (OEC. P)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY. PCT
9AROHETER, MN HC(IN HO)
RUN TIME, 9ECON09
BLOHE1 DIP P NN. M10(IN. HIO)
BLO«ER JHLET P HH. HIg(lH. »»0)
9LO«Ef> INLET TEMP. DEO. C(0!S. ')
0LONER REVOLUTIONS
CVB PLOM 8TO. CU. METRES(aCP)
HC ICKCRO METED/RANCi/'PM
CO
C02
COI
NOX
NOX
MC
CO
COI
NOX
HC
CO
COI
NOX
IAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
9CKCRO HETER/RANCE/PPH
COHCENTRA ION PPH
CONCCNTRA ION PPM
CONCENTRA ION PCT
CONCCNTRA
HA93 GRAN
MA99 CRAM
MAS! CRAH
»A9S CRAM
OFC. NET (DRY)
SCF, «ET (ORY)
VOL (1CH)
«M (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER, PVMT
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, C/KC
TEMPERATURE, DEC C
TOTAL FUEL 3ULFUR. MG/KH
AV6. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CON9UHPTION, L/IOO
HVDROCARBON9, C/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OX1DE9 Of NMAOCEN, C/RM
BT VEHICLE EHI99ION1 RE9ULT9
PROJECT 11-'771-001
VEHICLE NO. 1'
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM 2119 K0( *hfS LBB)
7kl.O (10.0)
7ki.O (30.0)
11.3 (110.0)
11111'
10'.' (7119.1)
II.O/ I/
Ik.'/ I/
17.1/13/ 5
1.0/13/ 2
9«.k/ I/
l.k/ ]/
90.9/ I/
l.l/ I/ 1
1'
11
l.kl
1.3k
10.01
kiai.i
IB. '9
.179 ( .Ik7)
1.000 ( ,17k)
10'.'
11.k7
111-11
710.'
'.I
19.0
Ik.l'
4.55
k3S
1B9.1
11.21
.11
.4k
.11
TEST HEIGHT 191* «C( 1000 LB9)
ACTUAL "OAO LOAO '.9 «•( 11.1 HP)
CA90LINE EM«9"
111-iJ
HPET
1000MM( II'IMILEB)
1-1.1
Ik.l / 7'.0
17.0
710.' (2'. 17)
7kk
7kl.O (10.0)
7kI.O (10.0)
11.' (111.0)
kl'7»
III.O (10H. I)
.01
k9
1
k7.1
U7k
10.11
1117.3
11.10
.115 ( .917)
1.000 ( ,'JI)
111.0
Ik.l'
111-11
710.'
10.1
Ik.l
2'.Ik
J.3O
51'
kl'
2k«.Q
11.17
.11
.kl
.1'
E-38
-------
TABU E-38. TEST in EMISSIONS RESULTS
TC3T NO. 111-11 DUN 1
CH1CLC HOOEL 79 'ORO GRAMAOA
NGINE •.' LC30I CIO) V-l
P.AN9M19910N >1
fill KG< '»«• (.111
AMMETER JO.lk m HG(I*.1« IN HG)
ELATIVE NUHioiir ti PCT
BIG RE3ULT9
BAG NUNBEI
OE9CRIPMON
BLOMER DIP P MM. HIOH. OIVGEN PCKCCHT
CATALV9T AV6. TEMP. DCG. c
CATALI9T «»«. IENP. OCG. C
HCA3UHEO DISTANCE KH
Oft, KET CDHt)
3CP. h.O DtG P)
AB9. HUHIDITT 10.1 CH/N6
COLD TRANSIENT
7bI.O (3H.tl)
7»I.O (30.0)
13.3 (110.0)
7k.I Uk»l.»
1B.O/ 3/ ISO
l.M )f IS
17.I/ 3/ 1189
.W 3/ 1%
99.h/ 3/ l.bS
».*/ 3/ .07
STABILIZED
7%I.O (30,U)
13.3 (11U.D)
130.1 CS'5.0)
NOA MUHIOITT CUDDECTlOli tACIO"
i •
HUl Tl
2/
hi
1111.3
t.Sl
lit. I
I.It
17.1*
SOI
1.10
3.10
ISl.l-
Ikk
4.9S
1.000 (
CATALYST AVG. TEHP. DEC C
CATALYST NAI. TEHP. OEG C
CAHBON OTOBIOE G/KH
'UEL CUMSUMPTION L/IOD
MVUrtOCAAUONS (TNC) G/KH
CAHdON HONUX1DC G/KH
OIIOE9 UF NITHQGtN G/KH
PVN - 1M 9BT VEHICLE EHI99ION9 RE9ULT9 - »ICn »E3T IDLt
PROJECT U-«>?1-001
VEHICLE IIOOEL '9 PORO GRAHAOA
ENGINE •.» LOOI CIO) V-l
TC9T HUN9EN
ICST CVCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
OOOHE1ER
CV9 - BAG CAMT • OVNAHOHETC*
TEMPERATURE OEG. C (DEC. P)
RELATIVE MUMIOItt, PCT
AANOHCTCH, HH HGtIH HG)
RUN TIHEr 9ECOHDS
IILOHER 01' P MM. HIOCIH. HIOI
BLOHER INLET P HH. HiO(l». NIO)
BLOKER INLET TEHP. OEG. CCOEC. P)
iLOHER REVOLUTIONI
09 PLOR >'0. CU. HCTRf9(9CP)
HC 9AHPLE HETtR/RANGE/PPH
HC BCNGP-0 HETEH/RANGE/PPH
CO 3ANPLE HCTtR/DANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO H(TCR/P.ANGE/PPH
coi SAMPLE HETER/RAHGE/PCT
COI 9CKGP.D HETER/RANGE/PCT
N0« SAMPLE HET(R/RANGE/PPN
HOM BCKGRO HETCR/MANCE/PPH
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI COHCEN1RA1JON PPM
MC MAil SHAHS
CO NA39 GP.AM9
COI HAI9 GRAMS
NOI NAM 9RAM9
OPC. "ET (0«Y)
9CP. NET (0«»)
VOL (9CN)
KH (MEASURED)
VEHICLE NO. 1>
TRANSM199inN A3
GVM III) NG< »fc%» L«s>
IM-II
9ET
&/11/7B
Ifb»M( MI1HUEIJ
I - 1 - I
7bl.n (30. U)
7bl.O (30. U)
»J.3 (110.0)
TI9T NUMBER.
PVMT
HUNIOITT,
TEMPERATURE.
TOTAL FUCL 9ULPUR*
AVG. EIM. OXYGEN.
CATALT9T AVG. TEMP.,
CATALT9T NAK. TEHP..
CARBON DIOIIDE,
FUEL CON9UNPTIDN.
HH MO
G/KG
ore c
HG/KH
PCT
OCG C
OCG C
6/KN
L/100KH
G/KM
I«U.b
II. H
CARBON NONOIIDE, G/KR
OIIOC9 OP HITROGtN, U/KH
TEAT HEIGHT !91<» KU( «Quo LitSJ
ACTUAL RUAO LOAO ».i «•< 13.1 "»)
1*1-13
HPET
1
1/31/7B
»7KN( 13t«MILE9)
I - I - 3
7.1.0 OO.O)
7bI.O (3U.U)
»>.< (lll.n)
US.3 ("173.t>
S3.S/ I/ <3
17.7/ il 19
S9.t/ll/ 133
.S/ll/ 2
1b.!/ Z/ 1.07
I.I/ tl .07
II. «
.Ml ( .«)•)
i.oon ( ."")
lit. 3
10.11
13.3
I«.OS
E-39
-------
TABLE £-59. TEST 141 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. i«i-ii RUN i
VCHICtt NOOEL 7R ''OHO 6P.ANA
INQINf 4.< 1(10* CIO) V-l
TRANSMISSION •]
8VN II 11 KC( 4*11 LBS)
•ARQMETCR 7H.*U MM HG(21.13
RILAUVE HUMIDITY SI PCT
SAC RESULTS
SAC NUMBER
BLOWER OIF P NM. M20(IN. M20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. M?OS.» (Jk!J.
i».»/ a/ i
.*/ }/
l.S/ I/ .0
«.>/ ?/ e
.^/ */
) 1 *O.U (1S11 .1
Li.u/ i/ U
../ 3/ S
(.»/ 3/ .US
*.!/ «/ ^
.'/ */ L
CATALTST AVC. TEMP, otc c
4.4;
S57
41.2
l.B
380.
.3
4.35
bl)2
bU.lb 132.73
J.bb 2.10
342.1 3b*3.S
-bS .3b
15. 3* 17. U)
»04 Ibb
4-85 4.4S
*lb SIT
S.l>4 b.lU
l.UOO ( .177)
11.75
i-rt*r.
>in>fiOCARt»ON3 (TNCj G/KM .01
C*»eOH MLiNOllUC WKM 1H. /^
OXIDES Pf NJTHUUt^ G/KM .h2
(»-(*A J
( 371. )
t 17.2 )
( .* )
( H. U )
t .b )
PVM - 141 38T vfHlCL£ EMISSIONS RE3ULT3 - "ICH «3T
VEHICLE MODCC >• FORD 8RANADA
tHQINE ^.^ L(3(t* CIO) V-t
TEST HUN8CH
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
OOOHETER
TEMPtRAruRC DEC. C (DEC. ')
RELATIVE HUMIOITT, PCT
ai»oncrEtf MM HGMN MO
RUN TIME, SECONDS
SLOWER OIF P MM. H|Q(IN. «*0)
BLOWER INLET TEMP! DEC. UDEG. ')
BLOnER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOM STD. cu. METRESOCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCNCNO NCTER/RANCC/PPM
co BCKCRO METER/RANCE/PPM
co» SAMPLE MITER/RANGE/PCT
NOK SAMPLE METERXRANCE
NOK BCNCRD METER/RANCE
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C0| CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPrt
HC MASS GHAM8
co» MASS GRAMS
NOl MASS GRAMS
Oft, »ET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (8CH)
KM (MEASURED)
TCST NUNBCR*
flABOMCTER,
HUMIOITV,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
G/KG
ore c
MG/HN
CATALYST AVG. TCM
CATALYST NAK. TEM
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
S/HM
L/1UOKM
HYDROCARBONS, C/KH
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/K"
OIIDCS OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 14
TRANSMISSION A3
141-32
1
b/ */7«
21.3 / >».'»
Si.l
7b2.0 (30. 0)
7b2.0 (iO.'l)
43.3 Clllt.O)
111 31"
207.4 (7)14.7)
40. ]/ 2/ 40
11. */ ?/ 12
S7.2/11/ 422
,7/H/ 2
B^.b/ >/ Ub7
1.7/ 9/ .Ob
2/ >e
2/ 1
17.
30
JM
.S7t ( ,lbl)
1.000 ( .472}
207.1
J.70
Sb»
bS7
21*. 4
It. «>H
.17
4.S?
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE CH-144
141-33
HfCT
b/ b/7B
i - I - J
S9.2
711. h (^I
7bS
43. « (in. a)
1.15-5
113.1 C»02?.3)
.Ob
b2
bCI. 7
2.14
21 . 74
4022.b
11.0
.141 ( .84
1.000 ( .*?
lll.o
lb.3J
141-33
731.b
11.1
. 1 3
1.33
-------
TABLE £-40. TEST 142 EMISSIONS RESULTS
i«t HP VEHICLE EHISMON* RESULT* • UH
TEST NU. i4i«ii HUN i
VCHlCtC MOO«L '• 'ORO QHANAOA
(NOINE »,l t(Jn? CID1 *-•
TRANSMISSION t)
C¥M 2111 KM ihtt LB3)
RELATIVE HUHiu
•AQ
BAG C*«T NQ.
DYNO NO.
CVS NO.
DRY BULB TEMP. 12.1 0(6 C(M.O OCG F)
TE51
ACTUA
NN( HOI "UtS)
BLO-ER OIF » MM. NtUdN. Htt>)
at. Out I* UMT P MM. H*n(lN. M*0)
BIOMCR tnLCI TEHP. DEC. C(DtC. F)
8LOME* DEVOLUTIONS
cvs FLO- $TD. cu. MtutcsocH
HC SAMPLE MCTER/RANCE/PHM
HC BCKfiftO METfM/9l'N&e/Pf»N
CO SAMPLE METtN/RAN6E/MM
CO HCKtfAO "ETKH/RANtiE/PRN
CO* SAMPLE HErER/HANGE/PCT
co? BCKCRO HeTER/KANgE/KT
MOV SAMPLE MCTER/fUNGC/P**
NO! BCKGRO MEUR/RANGE/FPH
DILUMO* FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION P'H
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
MO* CONCENTRATION PPH
HC "ASS QRAMa
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS 6HAM5
KOI HAftS (,r***a
CO SRAMS/KM
CO* 6*4Ha/RH
HOY GRAH4/KW
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY cu L/inuK
RUN HNJ SECUNOS
AVQ. eXM. OXVI.EN PE*»CENf
CATALYST AVG. TC.HP. UtC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEHP. DEC. C
MCASUREO DISTANCE «*H
0*C, «ET Uflt)
SCF, "€T (0»Y)
VOL (SCH)
MM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER l*««U
eAROMETER MM HC ?*1.S
TCMPCRATUftC OtC C II. »
AIS. HUMIDITY 10.
,
COLO THAHSIENT
77* J ( 30* S)
77'!? (30. S)
*].} (iin.o)
7 *°(M*7
11. O/ 3/ 110
X.O/ 3/ 10
.S/ ]/ It
l.S/ ]/ .OS
bO.S/ I/ bl
I.3/ «/ 1
B.lf
101
11*
l.SS
H.J
nN*
*lfc7.l
• .7b
.77
S.*S
1't.i
l.Sl
Jfc.»7
SOS
J.**
11*
Ihl
S.7S
.10* C
1.000 (
1 6H/KG
i
SIABILUED
??».? (30. S)
*}. (110.0)
^bOO
17.* */ 17
11.0 «/ 11
K.^/ll/ 12
M.fc/U/ *,
*.»/ a/ .oh
it. j/ ?/ )i
.*/ i i
13. 7
,«»
11.
I 2
i<*7.^
».*U
.0^
.(!•
SkS.l
1.9B
IS.hO
Rhk
s.is
S^l
Ifcl
t.u
*B*%)
.<7S)
07.0
NOX MUMimir cu«
]
HOT lH»NSltNT
774.7 Ofl.S)
»1.3 (110. 0)
Ml?-*.
30. J/ £/ 3
^.7/ */ 1
•j.J/ll/
l.S/ I/ .0
tn.3/ ?/ *
.*/ •»/
iu.su
21
l.ll
JH.%
.S*
1*1^.1
s.in
.U
.0*
*
1 DO
• U.Sb
SOS
'.hi
IS.
*4 7
5.7<
.^11
1.000
HECtlOt* fACTOM I
•
SlABILUEU
7 7% • > (lU.S )
771.7 (3U.5)
t3.3 (11(1. U)
HS^7
!.>.»/ »»/ lb
*.^/ */ 1U
' . 3/1 J/ H
S.%/13/ S
J.K/ ]/ .Hh
il. Jv */ 31
.*/ */ 1
1J.»S
.1
JO.
. h
tm,i
7.b&
,0^
.0*
JbJ.<
l.i*
It.SS
Bbb
S.70
3*0
VS7
fc.17
( .^Ob)
( .*77)
IQ7.Q
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KH 12.0
AVG. CIH. OIYGEN PCT <
CAXLTST AVG. TEHP. DEIS C 17
CATALYST H««. TEMP. DEC C «k
CARSQN OIOXIOE
riVUftOCAN60*3 (T«t)
CAhbQN HONUlIOe
OXIOCS Of NlTAOUkN
fi/NH
G/KM
(./KM
3-6AG
J*7.*
l.iO
l.i«
.25)
1.21)
VEHICLE **UOEL 7t PORO GftANAOA
ENGINE '.4 L(102 CIO) v-l
TEM NUHIED
TEST CTCLE
RUN MUHBEH
DATE
OOOHETER
TEN'(«A(URE \>IH. C <0t4. r)
RELATIVE HUHIOITV* PCT
RARU'CTCR. «H HC(IN MG)
RUN tlHE. SECONDS
BLnwCR olf f MM. H20CIN. H2U)
RLOHCH INLET H MM. HiOUN. H2Q)
BLOMCR INLET TEHP. PEC. C(PEG. F)
%COM€» REVOLUTIONS
CV1 'L0« SIO. CU. NETRES(SCF)
HC SAHPI.E HCTCR/RANCE/PPH
HC HCK6RD METER/flANGE/PPH
CO SAHPLE HETER/HANCC/PPH
CO ICKGRO lETER/RANCE/'PH
CO? tAHPLE HETEtt/MANbE/PCT
C02 HC«GRO HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOH SAHPLE HFTER/RANCE/PPH
HOX SCKGRD HETER/RANCE/PPH
NC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NQI CUNCtNTRATtON PPH
HC 1>SS CUAHS
CO IIASS GHAHS
COI «ASS GRAhS
N0« IIASS GHANS
OFCt «ET (DRY)
SCP. »ET (DRV)
VOL (SCN)
TEST NUHHERr PVHT
PARUMETEP* MM Hr.
HUMIOITf, G/HG
TEMPERATURE. OCG C
TOTAL FUEL 3UI.FUR* HG/HM
CARRON OIOIIUE. G/KH
FUEL CUNSUHPTION, L/1UO
HVOROCARBONS. G/KM
CARSON HUNOIlDt* ' G/NH
OMDtS OF HtTDUGEN, G/KH
SOT VEHICLE EMISSION! RESULTS
PROJECT 11- '771- 001
VEHICLE NO. 14
TRANSMISSION Al
GVK 2113 KCC «k>B LBS)
I/ t/71
kkl4«H( 41L4HILES)
2-1-1
21.4 / 71.0
'7.7
7'1.7 (24. it)
1147
774. J (10.5)
774.7 (10. t)
•1.1 (110.0)
ONHODIFIEO
21CT.' (7'lt.7>
22. I/ ?/ 21
4.3/ 2/ 4
24.k/ll/ 27
4.1/1 1/ •
lf.4/ I/ 1,5'
3.0/ 3/ .0$
fl.7/ 2/ S'
l.O/ It 1
It
22
l.SS
12. S
1.77
S.ll
S4I1.2
21.1!
,S<1 < .179)
1.000 ( .47k)
2111.'
21. kl
741.7
4.n
21.4
2S.1I
'.15
"I
513
*7h.l
11. t'
.01
.25
.41
TEST MllGMT 1B14
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD
GASOLINE EN-1"
142-13
HFET
1
•/ •/?•
kkkM<( 4142«ILCS>
2-1-1
741.7 (24.21)
7kk
774.7 (in.S)
774.7 (10.5)
'3.3 Uin.o)
klSSO
llt.S (4011.1)
23,I/ it 24
4.»/ 2/ 10
2S.4/I3/ 21
42. 7/ I/
I.I/ 2/
ki.l/ 2/
1. I/ t/
Ik
.07
ki
1
1.11
kl.7
1.0'
2.'4
llkl.l
12.55
.154 ( .BSD
1.000 ( ,47k)
115. S
Ik. 22
1X-11
141. 7
1.1
24.'
21.11
1.24
211.1
10.11
.Ok
.15
.77
E-11
-------
TABU £-11. TEST 112 EMISSIONS RESULTS
I.I FTP VtHlCLl EBIJJIONS «t>UlT3 - 1CIIIUON «HFI«t
TC9T MO. l*i-»l RUH 1
VEHICLE MODEL 7* FUHD GRANADA
{NG1NE 1.4 L(IOJ CIO) V-*
BiL*H*t NUllIUllT bS t*CT
*AC WFSULM
NAG NuMHtH
rUSCNlPTION
DILUTION FACIO*
HC MASS G«AM3
CO MA43 fcMAMS
co* MASS r,NA»s
MUX MASS &*AMS
CO GHAMS/NM
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, "ET (DHV)
SCF, «tT (OHY)
VOL (SCM)
HH (MEASURtO)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 1*2-21
BAROMETER MM HC 7*1.7
HUHI01TY ti/KG 1 L.I
TE81 HUM* EH
TEST CTCLE
RUM NUMflER
000*1 TEH
TEMPERATURE DEC. c (DEC. FJ
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PC T
«LO«ER OIF P MM. M?(j(Ih. M?0)
eLn«R INLET TIBP. oec. C(o£G. F)
NUI MAS1 CMAM$
OFC, "ET (DRY)
VUL C3CM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER* PVMT
MIIMIOITV, G/Hf,
TEMPfRATURE. OEC C
TOTAL FUEL *ULFU», MC/KH
tVC. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CARBON f)IOI IDi, U/KM
FUfL CONSUHPTHIM, L/Hi«iitM
MYOROCAHHQNS, G/KH
C ARMON HUM)* IOC, &/KN
OVIDES OF NITMUGEh, C/NM
VEHICLE NO. i*
DATE 8/11/71
BAG CART <*u. i
OVNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
ORY P-ULfl TtMP, 2?.?
12. i (1U4.0)
l.S/ 3/ IS
*Is/ 3/ !d7
GA3ULIME EM- 3 -»1
OEG CC72.0 DEC F)
I 3
STABILISED HOT TNANHIENT
7»4.3 (2 .5) 7*4.3 (24.5)
bkJ4 4UPTB
11. t/ 2/ 12 1. 1/ 3/ 11
St.Z/ 3/ 1.05 74. 7/ 3/ l.lb
4.2/ 3/ .Ob *.2/ 3/ .Ob
2.3/ if 2 1.7/ It I i.O/ 2/ 2
7.S4 12.71 t.O*
7D1 24 137
S7B S 2b
1.57 .44 1.11
30.41 ;.J3 k.iih
Sl.ib .JO 2.3b
2201.2 2373.1 14>».S
4.44 11.00 H.f*
S.3b .3b l.OS
1.4? .11 .41
312.3 JM.4 1*0. b
1.72 1.7i l.lb
17, b4 Ib.iU 1*.70
SO* Ib7 SOb
*.2* *.2i ».&*
340 S3I *«7
hLD 547 bUb
5.77 b.20 S.74
.402 ( .114} .410 (
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR 1C /KM 3*. 70
PROJECT U-*771-
VEHICLE HO. 1*
TRANSMISSION A3
aVh 2113 KG( *bt
142*22
SET
1
53.1
7*2.7 (24.2*)
1347
7*4.3 (24.5)
7*4.3 (#4.5)
*3.3 tlin.O)
211. (I (74«}rb)
t*.w i/ 100
11. 0/ 2/ 11
S4.3/13/ *•
*.l/ll/ 4
40. I/ ]/ 1.70
I.b3
bS.S
10.45
1 0 . ) 4
2S.C4
.171 ( .Bk3)
1.000 ( .471)
211. U
21. S*
1*2-22
4.1
22,2
4.14
242.8
12. bn
.SI
.m
1. ib
HYDROCAHaOM (TNC) G/KM.
CA880N MONO* roe G/KM
001
LBS) GASOLINE EH-31*
1
7071KH( 4344M[LE9)
2-1-1
742.7 (24.21)
714.3 (24.5)
744.3 (24, S)
10. S/ 3/ 105
1.2/ 3/ 12
47.0/I3/ *0
IS. I/ 2/ 2.01
l.b/ */ .Ob
7b.4/ 2/ 77
t.UX 2/ 2
4S
7S.2
». i*
Ib. 10
.»44 ( ,i»0)
l.OliO ( .471)
US. 7
lb.3i
142-23
4. 7
23.4
b33
254.3
IU.^3
.14
. 9*'
31ABILIZED
7*H.3 (24.5)
7*4.3 (24. i)
*3.3 (110. U)
11. V 2/ 1
ia.»/i3/ i
l.b/ */ 2
12.71
2t
.4t|
'301.4
.35
.13
372. b
1.77
lS.4b
• bb
S.S6
533
547
b.ll
!t74J
1-BAG (4-6AG)
371.1 ( 3bl.l)
Ib.i4 ( Ib.Qb)
I.b4 ( 1.58)
*.U« ( 2.03)
-------
1IBY NO. 111-31 RUN I
VEHICLE NOIIF.L 79 FORT! GRANADA
ENSINf 1.1 L(3'I2 CIO) v-9
TRANSMISSION >1
GVM 2113 Kl*{ 1bS9 LB9)
9ARUNCTER 712.11 MM HC(11.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY kt <*C'
•>0 RESULTS
BAD NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
«.0«ER 01' P NH. H20U-I. M2U)
BIOMCR IHLET f HH. HlotlK. NSO)
«LO»CR INLET TEH'. OtG. C(OEC. F)
910KER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO" 510. CU. HETREStSCF)
HC SAMPLE N61EK/HANGE/PPN
HC BCKGRO METER/RANUE/PPH
CO SAHPLt HETER/RANCE/PPM
CO eCKGKD H£TE»/RANC£/PPN
CO* SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PCT
cot 9CRGRD H(U«/IIAM;E/PCT
N0« 9AHPLC HETER/"ANGE/PPM
KOI 9CKCSO Mt.TeB/«ANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COf CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC NA9S GNAMS
CO "All GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GMAM9
HC 8KAM9/HH
CO SRANft/KH
CU7 &f)AMS/NM
HOI GMAM9/KM
PUEL CUN9UMPI1I1N (IV CB L/lnflKM
PUN TIME StCONOS
AV8. EHH. nnvCCH PERCENT
CATALvST AVf.. T£HP. otG. C
CklALfJT «AI. 1[»P. Ott. C
MEA9UP.IO 019TANCE «"
OfC. «ET (l(»t)
SCti «l (OKT)
VOL (9CM)
KM (HCA3UKF.O)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST XUMDlIt 111-11
(UDONETe* MM HC 7*2.V
HUMIDITY G/KG ~ U.I
TCMPCDATURE UFC C It.I
TABU E-12. TEST 142 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HI FYP VCKICLE CHIUlum RIBUITS - ISNIT10N MI3F1RC
PROJECT 11.1771'001
VEHICLE NO. 11 TEST MC1GHT 191
DATE 9/1S/7R ACTUAL ROAD LOAO
BAT. CART NO. 1 GASUL.INI (M-111
OTNO NO. 3 OOOMETER lull K
CVS NO. 1
"(*( YOOO L85)
*,• NM( U.rf HP)
AM. HUHIOITT 11.1 CN/KG
010 TRANSIENT STAdlulitO
7k2
7kl
13
"
1.
Ik.
,
91*
1,
1.
.0 (30.0) )kl.
.0 (30.0) 7kl.
.3 (110. 0) 13.
10731
.5 (1700. S) 130.
7/ It 17 11.
O/ I/ k03 11.
k/ 3/ 11 9.
I/ 3/ 1.19 SB.
O/ 3/ .Ok 1.
I/ I/ 1 1.
7.91
(3n.
(3D.
(110
1715
0)
0)
.0)
(lkll.5)
It
13/
13/
}/ 1
3/
2/
l.H
7k7 90
Ski 3
l.i! .17
71.0 13.9
33.93 1.1
1131.3 1317.
lo.lb 11.1
5.97 .3
9.kk .0
370.9 37k.
1.10 l.t
17.19 Ik. I
10k Ik7
1.01 5.3CI
391 539
klO k31
I.'k k.l)
.101 ( .911)
1.000 ( .171)
107.3
11.11
13
11
»
.03
,0k
1
NOX HUHIOITV CORRECTION FACTOR
3 1
HOT IKANSiruT
Jfc«.U OQ.O)
71.2.0 (»0.0)
*J.J (llll.O)
(3^.0)
1.B/13/
71.1)/ 3/ 1.1
1.3/ 3/ .0
130. >
!*.£/
11. *'
1.13
HI
31
1.31
S».l
t.li
2.11
1111.1
7.11
1.09
.Si
U7.S
11. SI
SOI
LSI
1*1
klO
5.71
13.01
1,
*
.Ik
111.9
1.0)
.kk
2305.0
10.31
.33
.11
379. k
Ikloil
Bk9
5. Si
139
kOl
k.17
.111 ( .911)
1. 000 ( .171)
207.0
11.11
TOTAL FUEL AULFUR MG/KM 31.11
AvG. fXH. OKVGCN PCT 1.11
CATALVST AVG. (6HP, OEG C SOS
CATALV9T NAN. TEMP. DEC C k31
CAMON OIOHIDE
'UEL CONSUMPTION
HVOMOCAftttONS UHC)
CARBON MONUHIUE
(iniocs of NITHOUN
C/KM
L/lOnKH
G/KH
G/KH
9-
HC SAMPLE HETEH/RANUE/PHH
HC ttCKt;HO MCTetl/RAH^e/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/HANGC/PPH
CO BCKGRO HtTE«/RAN«/PP>l
C02 SAMPLE HETEN/RANGE/PCT
COF BCKGRO HETER/RANGC/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METERVHANCE'PPH
HC CUNCENTRATIQN PPM
CO CONCCKTKATION PP«
C02 CO~Ctf.TK.IIOi PCT
H0< CONCEKI'ATION PPM
HC HASS GUAHS
CO NABS GXAM9
CO? NAB* GHAMS
NOX NA99 GRAMS
OFCr 1ET (ONT)
SCF, »CT (Dill)
VIIL (SCN)
«H (MEASURED)
TC9I HU»«t«. PVMI
•AMOMCIER. HM MR
HUMIDITY, 0/KG
TEMFERATURt. DEC C
TOTAL FUEL 1UUPUH, HG/XM
CATALYST AVG. TEHP.,
CATALYST HA<. TEMP.,
OtG C
DEC C
FUEL CONSUMKIIUN, L/1UII
HYOROCARBONK. G/KH
CARBON MOMIXll>», ' G/KH
0>IOCS OF HIT'OGFN, r,/XH
VEHICLE NO, 11
T1A»«»ISS10N A3
119-39
SET
I
B/1S/7B
7117KMC 11f2HlLEB)
I • 1 - 3
12.2 / 71.0
S3.1
719.7 (21.11)
7ki.O (30.0)
7kl.O (30.«)
13.1 (111.0)
112311
210.7 (7110.1)
10. If I/ 101
l.i/ 3/ 11
kk.7/13/ SI
3.1/I3/ 3
10. o/ I/ I.k9
1.1/ M
.Ok
l.l/ I'
11
I.k3
k9.1
,171 ( ,9k1)
1.000 t .171)
210.7
21. «1
111-32
711.7
1. 1
12.1
Ik. 19
1.19
S13
Mi
111.1
11. SI
.SI
1.21
TEST HEIGHT 1911 IC( 1000 LIS)
ACTUAL »OAI> LOAD 1.9 «"( 13.1 HP)
RASOLINE £H-311
112-33
HFIT
9/IS/79
2-1-3
97
1
13.3 / 71.0
17.1
711.7 (11.21)
7hS
7k2.0 (30.0)
7k2.0 (30.0)
13.1 (111.0)
klllk
111.3 (1073.1)
10.3/ 3/ 103
1.3/ 3/ 13
J7.7/13/ 33
1.1/I3/ I
1S.3/ I/ 2.02
l.l/ 2/
9k.I/ i/
1.3/ II
11
21
1.1k
is.a
k.ll
3,11
111k.I
17.kl
.919 ( .»1)
1.00H ( .17))
lli.l
Ik. 30
IH-13
711.7
9.k
23.3
23.11
I. Ilk
.21
1.01
E-13
-------
TABU E-43. TEST 143 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 1*1 FT? VEHICLE EMIM1UN$ RCIULTI • UNNOOJFltO
TtST no. iil-ll RUN l
ENSINf 1.1 L(l'i* CIU) V-l
1*6 Iff. lux t B
NAG NU'IRTH
MOl StHPLE Ml HWHANGE/t**"*
OtLUTKlN FACTOR
MC GRAMS/KM
CO CetMS/nM
COt GRAMS/KM
DUN T)Mp 9KONDS
OK, ȣT (0*V)
SCF, wit (Q»Y)
HU«10I IT t/Hl, q, 7 c
V€MICLI NO. 1*
HAG CART NO. 1
DVNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
PKV 9ULfl TEMP. 23
4 M.I. HimiOI TV *.
t
COLO TRANSIENT
13.3 ( 110. U)
11. J/ 3/ 113
.b/ »/ b
l.n/ »/ i)
b'.l/ 2/ b?
l.J/ ?/ 1
".I*
ins
3*3
i.7b
.H«
I. bit
IS. 71
SOI
.401 (
1.000 (
OOOHLTEtt HO* «H{ (bU HILES)
.4 OEb C(7S.O DEC F)
2 3
STABILUEO HOT TRANSIENT
13. (110. 0) *1.3 (110. 0)
11. S 2/ 11 27. J/ 2/ 97
7.7 2/ H 7.U/ 2/ 7
<1.0 13/ 20 H.S/13/ 1*
*.» J/ .07 i.i/ 3/ .0?
1.0 «/ 1 .*/ ?/ 1
«.44 10.13
7 21
7 It
.*b 1.2b
3t.b 11.2
.S .42
1.0 I.b3
.0 .lb
.1 .21
37&. 102.0
l.S 1.07
lb.0 12. *3
•b? 403
V.23 t.tl
.1*4) .417
.474) 1.000
20*. J
12.07
1 CARBON OIUHOE G/KH
HYOROC ARSONS CTMC) (r/Kfl
* CiRBON MONUXIDE b/KH
*
SlABILUED
13.3 (110.0)
11. */ Z/ 1
b.*«?0)
«LU"fH IHLfT f UN, H*(i(lN. itgo)
»L»»€H P*LET Te»p. yp/;. c(nfr,. r>
rtLOHC>« ftvotur(DM
VEHICLE NO. i*
CO
COf
»vr,. I£HP., nf-G c
GVH 2113 »C< ibSi Ltf*)
SET
7/14/7B
2-1-1
73*.l (2*. 10)
771.7 (30. S)
771.7 (30. S>
M.j (no. n)
112210
3*. I/ 2/ 3*
ib.l/ 2/ 27
SI.1/13/ if
•b.l/ 3/ l.bl
l.S/ 3/ .OS
Sb.l/ 2/ S7
. •/ 2/ 1
12
l.«b
l.lf
10.2$
SH*3.3
.«74 (* .170)
21. bl
H3-12
73*.l
IP. 7
2S.12
1S7
1 l.flt-
.Q*
.13
1.01
CA90L1NC
1H«"
7/l*/7l
( - \ - \
734.1 (24.1(1)
771.7 (311. S)
771.7 (30.5)
11.3 (UK. Q)
115.* (*041.3)
3«.2/ ?/ 3*
2d. 2/ '/ in
25.3/I9/ 23
l.h/ 2/ .Ob
73. I/ 2/ 71
1.2/ */ 1
l.*l
72. »
?!?o
Klll.t
l.noo ( .*73)
lb.13
1*1-13
73*. 1
*. 7
2S.t>
22, S*
1 7*
lO.St
,17
. 1 b
TEST WEIGHT in* K&( 1000 LBB>
ACTUAL ftoAb LO*O ».• KH( ^.^ H?j
E-W
-------
TABU £-44. TEST 143 HUSSIONS RESULTS
- It) FTP VtHlCLt CNIIBIUMI *KSULTI - DISABLED Et»»AIft flPV
PKOJCCT 11-4771-001
TEST NO. i«j-*i »*UM
VEHICLE -*unfL 7* FORD u
ENCINf 1.4 L(3n< ci») v-a
lAtuftMlssuiN 11
6VM 2111 «r,( *ht| LHS)
•CLATTVE Nimiutrv s
»iO RE SOL 14
«AC NUMBER
OESCMP TION
RLO»Eft UlF P IM,
SLOPFl iNctT T* U
«LO*€R PU.FT ttH
SLOWER REVULUtUl
CV9 'LOW 3TO, LU
MC SAMPLI. Nflf H
rfOU*. H?U)
H?0(I*. *iMP)
oec. t(i>tt;. F
CO 5* "PUt Mf TER/lANGE/Pfr-M
CO BCKfiBO "ETER/"»ANt»E/PPH
C0| SAMPLE "ETER/KANUt/PCT
CO? ttCMfllU Hf TC,R/RANGE/P( T
NO* SAMPLE MtTER/RANUf/Pf'M
NOl ^CHfiHO Mf TER/HANUE/PH*
OILUTIUtt FACTOR
HC COMCCHTHtTlOH PPM
CO CONCfcNfMM [QN PPM
CD? CONCfNrHMlQN PC T
xnv CONCENIRMIDN PPH
MC MASS GUAM
CO -US3 GMkMS
CO* *A!t3 CM»HS
SUM <«A9tl i«P.AMi)
HC CRAMS/KM
CO &*AM5/KM
CO? QRAMU/KH
HOK fifl*N3/K*
PUffL CUN8UHPTION 6* Cfl L/ll'l
•u« TIME IFCONP
AVR. CKH. UlTtiEN PKBtrti
c»Tn.t»T Avr,. um>. int. c
C*T»Lf3T M.AI. TfMP. otd. C
HC«»UHEU DISTANCE KM
DFC. «CT (OKT)
SCF« MET (OMV)
»ui OC")
HM (MCMURkO)
COMPOSITE
TESI NU
6/ttf. •
Ott C
i*«-?i
?«it. 1
CINC *,•» nja
TEST NJMMF.R
TEST C»Ctl
•UN NUMHCR
f)ATF
CVS -
u«e UEC. C (Of<>. f)
HUMlOlTY, PCT
HC 9C*fi«C Htl
CO »CK(!»0 ^tT
C02
HUI
CD
CO?
PCT
PPM
VEHICLE NO. 14
BAG CART NO. 1
OfNO NO. i
CVS NO. 2
TEST HEIGHT 1111 «si .000 UBJI
>CTU>L «0»D 10«0 1.1 ««( U.J Mf)
OSOL1NE t«-H»
DRV BULB TEHP. 22.2 DEC C(7«.o DEC F)
IPS. MUN10ITT 4,t
COLO TKftNSIEM
7b2.n (30, U)
7^2. 0 ( 3(t.i))
»3.3 (lin.O)
>S.7 Ub?2.«)
P.Q/ 3/ 14D
.<•/ 3/ b
• 2.fl/ V l.Sl
4.n/ 3/ .Ob
S7.S/ 3/ l>l
.»/ I/ 2
fl.Sl
I3S
I. 4k
I 7lt . b
t.ll
43.24
2011.4
ZJ.4t»
I. '11
7.Sb
353.2
4. 14
15.72
503
2b4
40rf
* .72
.404 ( .
1.000 ( .
j
n>T»L FUEL SULFUR MG/KM ».**
*vr, . MM
CATALW
CATALTST
PV* - 143
0*YGE* PCT ».u?
AVli. TEMP, pee C 338
HAH. TEMP. PEG C 414
9BT VEHICLE EMISSIONS
VEHICLE NO, 14
TRANSMISSION A3
6VM Jin KG( 4bSI
141-«
SET
1
4"31RH(/?"ll HI FS)
2-1-3
?4. « / 7b.O
7b2.Q (30.0)
7bt.l) ( 30.U)
41.3 (HU.0)
It 14«|.
214.; ( 7)14. 1 )
!• t W 2/ 1^
4.H/ 2/ S
<4.n/|)/ it
.Z/13/ 0
).!/ >/ .OS
4?.W I/ 249
. 7/ 3/ 2
14
l.bl
«4I .0
l.M
&.1U
blfcb.O
.«7b C .Bb4)
l.l'On ( .477)
2Q4.2
91.71
,{;;;"
,J-J
ib.Ul
*»/«« 1Q« 1U»ID11I CUHCCT10K ftCtOO .«7
STltlLllEU HOI TN>N9IEM) 9UIILIZEO
7bf.o (10.0) 7kJ.n (1Q.O) 7bl.O 110. 0)
7b{.Q (10.0) 7b^.l) (10.0) >b*.0 130.0)
»0.b (105. 0) •>(.* (10'. 0) «l.i (110. U)
>.u »/ 7 I..O/ / b b.l/ «/
is. i)/ is n.b/i / it io.o/iiy i
. IV 0 .>/li/ 0 .1/U/
57. )/ 1.01 72. b/ 9/ l.li Sb.i/ I/ .1
'. i/ .0' t.b/ i/ .o? «.b/ }/ .n
21. I/ 44 SI.7/ )/ 17b li.l/ I/ 101
I/ i .I/ I/ 2 .V )/ 1
D.lb 10. li 13. VS
I 1» 7
.O l.^S .41
'7.1 17J.1 <«.«
.bO 1.47 .(b
*.ll '••» 1.1S
Kll.i 17 1.17
It. II 11. 0» 15. 3J
Ih7 SOS Ib7
is* its isi
111 41* 40b
b.17 t.7b b.ll
"») .117 ( ,10b)
177) 1.000 ( .171)
"*.» iOb.l
]-«>« (1-»C)
FUEL CON3UHCT10N L/1')OKN 1S.U1 ( 1*
MTOaOCARoOt* (1HC) &/HM .19 (
C«B»OH xoxouoe r./«« i.«g ( i
OI10E9 or NIl^Q^th £/K" l.ui ( 1
AESUI.T5 • 019A8LEO CCb««lH 8PV
TC3I HEIGHT 1114 K0( 4000 L«l)
LB31 ClSOLINt C^-XI
111-21
1
7/11/71 ' '
i - 1 - 1
4>.H
711.1 (J1.ll)
7bi 0 (lil.d)
7b<*.0 (10.0)
42.1 (101.0)
b!747
11S.S (4071. n)
|1.1/ 2/ 11
4. fl/ 2/ S
j?^*'!!/ 20
.b/»/ 1
"lls/ 2/ '.15
n'.n 4/ i«a
.4/ 4/ t
IS
l.M
171. b
1 .111
2. SI
4120.2
_R5""jJ*,,,)
1. 1100 ( .174)
11S.S
lb.»
111-2]
ib.l
21. US
.111
.11)
.14)
.011
PCT
i>tr, c
Utr, f
-------
TIS1 HO. 1«»-U «UN I
•CHICLE MODEL 78 fnnu LH*ASIDA
INftINf 4.1 LCJOJ CID) V-l
TRANSMISSION A]
BARONfTER 744. *8 MM HC<2<.33 IN ill/)
•A6 RESULTS
ft A 6 NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
• LOWER OIF P MM. H»0(ln. H?(.)
BL(t*ER IftLET P HH. Henri*. «*0)
BLO»EN i«ter UUP, oei. i.^'tc. ')
§LO«EN REVOLUTIONS
co SAMPLE *tHR/HANut/t'*"<
CO BtNCffO MEUH/trfNUE/t"'"
co? SAMPLE MMEW/HANG* /PCT
OlLUtM* FACTO*
HC CONCFNTRATIO* fP"
CO ClihCENTRATtQN PPt
CO? CONCENTRATION PCf
HC MASS GRAMS
CO 1ASS C«4«S
CO; "ASJI U»*M3
HC SHAHS/**
CO GRAMS/KM
CO* flMAMS/KM
FUF.L CONSUMPTION BY CH L/IIHIKM
RUN TIME WCUND9
MCASUNLO UISUNCE «*
[>fC, NET (1IHY)
SCF, NET (DAY)
VOL (SCn)
COMPOSITE WCSULT3
IEST NUMBER 1*3-11
MUM 10 1 IT G/KG • P.»
TEST NUNMF.U
TEST CYCLE
PATE
OOIIHE TEM
• U.ll.r „„.,„,,„ .c.
WtIN rilf, SF.CUNDS
HLO»€» f)lf P M». H7f)
SCF» «tEf (OM*)
VML (SC'O
HH (MEASURED)
TEST NUHHE", PVHI
•lAROHE UR, -" hG
HUMIDITY (,/*!,
TE^EWATune. UK; c
AVG. E*H. U«»GtN, Ptl
C*T*L»51 1AI. TFMP., I>K, C
CARBUN nlo«IUE» r.'«»
TABU E-^45. TEST W3
PHOJCCT 11-
VEHICLE Nil.
DATE ?/*•«/ 7
MAG CART NO.
DYNO NU.
cvs MO.
DRY HULB TEMP.
I
COLO rpANSIENT
7»«. 3 (7**5)
7*«.a (7*,S)
•9.3 (110.0)
lObttO
7X.7 ( .72
4.35
37b.*
».4?
lb.91
50S
7.**
?•!
418
5.75
.*05
1.000
T"T»i FUEL suL'u* MC/XM ?
PROJECT 11-
VEHICLE NO.
TRANSMISSION A
GV» 7113 «G<
143-32
SET
1
7/?4/)8
•l«2l>KH( 30HIHI
I - I - 1
47.1
74t.J (?*.3*>
1 3*8
74*. 3 (i*.S)
74*. 3 (7*.S)
43.3 (UU.n)
11773b
711.7 (7478.7)
77. i/ £/ 27
10. 5/ ?/ 10
33.7/13/ JO
^.8/13X *
lt.3/ 3/ l.bt
3. to/ 3X .Ob
**.»/ )/ 2*8
.*/ J/ 3
13
21
l.S*
^*5.8
l.S*
S.07
b!8l .*
LI 1 .*!
.•77 ( .••>*)
l.llflO ( .*7b)
711.7
91.4k
lt3-3?
744.7
*.a
73. J
Jb.» 1
3.ns
*»«
*;?*
2t*. I
12.37
EniSSIONS RESULTS
771-001
M TEST *ElGHf 18
• ACTUAL ROAD LO*O
1 bASULlNC fM-341*
2
72.7 OCt C(7Z.O DEC F)
2 3
74*. (**.S) 74*. 3 (2*.S)
7 *. (?*.$) 74*. 9 (2*. 5)
3. (110.0) 43.3 (110. 0)
*717 »Ufc7l
.7 «/ b.i/ B/ 7
.4 13/ S5.8/13/ 4
.0 13/ S.S/lj/
.b/ 3/ 2 .S/ 3/
l?.*b *..7«
7 42
$ 4«
.48 l.JB
4*,» 21 .1
.51 .84
.7 ,71
8951, 1* O.b
ff,3 2 .S7
.0 .32
.1 .bb
384. 340. b
3.b 5.1^
Ib.t It.b]
Kb? SOb
*.*5 3. SI
37* 339
473 4-»Q
b.12 5.70
( .8*7) .*17 (
( ,*7*) i.oun (
2"l.3
11.87
4.31 CAHBON DIOXIDE G/KH
3S4 HYDROCARBONS (THC) f,/fiH
UlIDCI Of MTRUtibN C/KM
4771-U01
i* TEST MEKNT la
*h58 LBS) GAftOLtMF FH-J44
143-43
HFcr
i
?/74/?t
24. t / ?fc.O
*l .»•
744.7 (^*.)7)
>b*
7»*.3 (**.*>
7«*. 3 (2^.5)
*3.3 (11". H)
fcl-Ul
iiS.S (*0*2.1)
2 .S/ 7/ 74
1 .If ?/ 10
2 .0/13/ 25
1 .R/13/ !(•
,7/ 7/ .Ob
3 .?/ 4/ 387
.»/ »/ 4
Lb
111
L.8«
111. b
1 .Ob
1.35
3*75.5
78.7*
.8S» ( .857)
I .fill ft t .*7t)
115.*
Ib. 1J
1*3-33
7%«. 7
*. 1
74.4
??.?<•
1. '7
481
S 37
?43. 3
in.»i>
* KCl *000 L»S)
4
ilAHILlZED
744.3 (j .1)
7»*.J (* .5)
43.3 (1 0.0)
b*57
Ul.i (4 38. i)
7. It/ «/ 7
b,fc/li/ b
l.^/li/ 1
.*/ J/ <
14.11
7
5
.*b
*l.l
.11
.74
14 KU( 4000 LBS)
/ /
01IUE9 nf NITHUGEN, >,;K
-------
TABU E-t6. TEST 1H5 EMISSIONS RESULTS
n% PTP vrnicit EMISSIONS RESULT* - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-1771-901
1191 HO. Ili-ll "UN I
VEHICLE MUOCL 'I FOND CRANAOA
I"»l»l 1.1 111"! CD) v-s
TRAN9MI9S1DM A I
6V" til] KC( IkiB LSS)
RELATIVE HUHtOITV bb PC'
• AC RESULTS
RAG NUHOCR
DESCRIPTION
•LO»fR OIF * MM. MtOdN. MfQ)
BLOXR IHLCT P Ml. MtO(IN. HJO)
OLOBER IHLET TEMP. DEC. CCDCC. F)
BioHta aevoLuuoHS
Cvi 'LO» 510. Co. Hf.TRrs(BCF)
HC SAMPLE HEtcR/RANcc/ppM
NC BOGRO MF.UR/BANGE/FPM
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANCE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
cot SAMPLE HCTER/RANGE/PCT
COI SCKGRO HETER/RANOE/PCT
HOX 9*«PLt HCTCR/RAHQC/PPH
NOI BCKGRD NETER/RANCE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CtlMCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION "*
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
N0» CONCENTRATION PPM
HC «»• GRAHB
CO MASS CRANS
COP HttS GRAMS
WOK MASS CHANS
HC CKAH9/KM
CO 6DAHS/KH
Cor 6RAHB/KN
VIHICLC NO. I'
DATE I/
0«T BULB TtNP. J|. 1
AM. HUM ID lit II. I <
ItSI HEIGHT 1BK KG(
ACTUAL KOAO LOAD ^*B
<000 IBS)
(•( D.I HP)
C<7».0 DIC F>
HOI HUHtOlT* CO««ECtIO» fACIO« 1.04
CONSUMP
»U» HHE SECONDS
AVG. OH. OlrGEN PEICENI
CATALYST AVO. TCHP. OCG. c
CATALT9T «A». TEHP. OES. C
O'C. »1T (OUT)
SCP, MET (DAT)
»OL OCH)
«H (H(ASU»0)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
1(51 NUHBEH 1»S-H
• ADOHE'C' HH HG MB. I
HUHUIlt t/KG n.i
TEMPERATURE OEG C il.J
COLD IKAN9UNT
7bt.O (10.0)
7bt.O (10.0)
11.1 (110.0)
7k.1 (IblB.D)
10.I/ I/ 101
I.I/ I/ 11
St.I/ If l.il
1.D/ I/ .Ob
Ibb
LIB
>'.1B
tOtb.B
KB.S
tt'.Jt
90S
in
STIBILUED
'bi.O (10.0)
'bi.O (10.0)
11.1 (110.0)
70101
110.B (IblB.b)
17.I/ «/ 17
It.B/ i/
10.B/13/
b.l/ll/
Sb.l/ I/
I.I/ If
11.1/ t/
.i/ t/
II.ii
11
10
• Ob
II
*7B
.110 (
1.000 (
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR HC/KH 11.4
AVG. E>H. OIYGEN PCT l.»
CATALYST AVC. TEMP. OEC C II
CATALYST MAI. TIHP. DEO. C
Qb.1
LSI
HOT TMAMSItm
7bt.O (10.9)
'kt.O (10.9)
•1.3 (110.0)
1UB11
7b.t (ibH.i)
11.S/ if 11
11.if II II
II.I/I]/ bO
It'.l/ I/ 1.11
I.B/ I/ .Ob
)1,1/ i/ 11
.«/ t/ 1
10.11
11
SU91LUEO
7bt.O (10.0)
7bt.O (10.0)
11.1 (11B.O)
110.0 (1S11.D
H.•/ if li
10.B/ if
ii.b/ I/
l.b/ ]/
ib.1/ i/
11.
(B)|
>0.7
i>2
.b7
IIS. I
1.07
.07
.11
Sbi.l
1.31
11.11
IH
i.17
• 11
b.lS
Lib
1>. 7
1.17
1.7B
1141. i
S.11
.ib
.Bl
1U7.0
1.01
11.11
SOk
».0t
171
S.71
.110 (
1.000 (
CARBON 0101 IDC C/KM
FUEL CON9UHPTION L/1OQKH
HYDROCARBONS (THC) C/KH
CABION HONOIIDE G/KH
OXIDES OF MTUOGtH G/«.«
.B
tb.
. b
. «
4017. t
b.BI
.Ob
.01
11B.B
1.11
11. OS
Bbb
b.li
17B
b.17
.107)
.171)
tOb.l
11.10
>-«AG
lib.!
11.11
.Ci
l.'k
l.JT
PVH - 111 SBT
VEHICLE EHIS9IONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
•«OJ(CT 11-1771-001
VEHICLE MUPEL 7B FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 1.1 L(10i CID) 1-t
IEBT NUNBC*
TEST CTCLt
RUM NUMBER.
DATE
ODOHETER
CVS - *AG CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEHPCRATURE OEG. C (OEG. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
RAROHEFER, MM HG(IN HQ)
•UN ll»t. 9ECONOB
BLOMER DIP P »». HIOdM. M|0)
•LOntR I«L£T P HM. H«0(IN. H}0)
RLOXER INLET TEHP. OEC. C(DEG. P)
BLOXR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO« STO. CU. "EIRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HEIER/DAHGE/PPM
HC BCHGRO HeTER/RANGC/PPM
CO SAMPLt HETER/PANCe/PPH
CO QCKCRU MErEff/RANCE/PPH
COf lAHPLt H£fFR/flA«*GE/PCT
COP BC'CRO HEIER/RANtE/PCT
HOI SAMPLE Ht1<»/>A»G.E/PPM
NOX BCNCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION fff
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C0« CONCENTRATION PCT
NOK CONCENTRATION PPM
HC >A19 GRAMS
CO MASS CP.AHS
cot MASS CHAM*
NOI MASS GRAMS
DFC, »ET (DRY)
SCF, «EI (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
«M (MEAiUDtO)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
PVHT
HM HG
G/KC
OEC c
HG/KH
CATALYST AVG. TEHP., DIG C
CATALYST HAI. TEMP., OEG C
CARBON D10IIDE, C/KH
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS,
CARBON MONOII1DE.
O«IOE> or HimoGm,
VEHICLE NO. 11
TRANSMISSION A]
CVII till >G( «bSB LB9>
SCT
1
l/tl/7t
IB11KH( i
t - 1 -
77MUI1)
G/KN
ti.B I 71,0
SO.l
71B.1 (tl.Ob)
1117
7bt.O (10.0)
7bt.O (10.0)
11.1 (110.0)
101.1 (7111.7)
11.I/ if 20
B.b/ If 1
• '.Ul)/ <
B1.1/ }/ 1.97
1.7/ }/ .Ob
tl.1/ if It
l.O/ )/ 1
It
21
Lit
11.!
1.11
1911.i
11.11
.lit ( .171)
1.000 ( ,17b)
J01.1
tl.7t
71B.1
B.I
JJ.A
81. H
111
C7t
• 07
.27
.It
TEST HEIGHT 1BH 000 LB.S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.B «•( 11.t HP)
GA>OLI«E EM-lIt
119-11
HFCT
B/tB/7B
BBtl1>M( tlooOMILCB)
t - 1 - 1
711.1 (tl.Ob)
7bt
Ikt.O (10.0)
)bt.O (10.0)
11.1 (110.0)
b!70t
Ui.J (11170. b>
11. 9/ t/ in
7.9/ t/ B
B.b/ll/ B
t.1/11/ t
17. t/ It 1.11
l.b/ I/
bl.O/ t/
l.l/ t/
11
.Ob
I.7B
bO.l
.B«
.90
17b0.1
It. io
.Ikl ( .Bit)
1.000 ( .171)
115. t
lb.11
119-11
711.1
B.I
it.B
tl.11
1.39
iiO
S7t
II). 0
Lib
.Oi
.Oi
.77
-------
fl(T NO. 141-11 B.UN 1
VEHICLE HOOEl 71 FClHO CKANAOA
KINE '.' LIIOI CIO) v-l
•ANtNllllON Al
till K0( 4kll LID
AION(TCP) II4.14 NH HBI14.10 I" HO)
ELAMVE NUNIOIT> k4 'CT
AO Dtllll.il
•AC »o»»t«
OEIOl'TION
ILO««« OIF ' N>. NIOdN. H10)
ILOKEt INLET <• MM. «)a(IN. Hto>
lLO»l» INLET lt»f. OE«. c(DEt. '
•L0«l« KCVOLUTION9
cvi 'LO> sro. cu. HCmiKjcF)
HC SAMPLE NETCtt/DANflE/FPH
BC ic'coo xmt/fntf/"'
CO »C«8"0 "tlE^/RAKSt/""
C01 3ANPLE NETEH/aANCE/F>Cr
C0> ICKB10 NCTt«/««««/'Cr
NOI SAMPLE NETER/RANCC/PPN
N0> IC*C*0 N(TE*/«ANCE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION MN
CO CONCENTRATION MH
COt CONCENTDATION »CT
NOI CONCENTRATION m
HC NAII BRAN]
CO NAII 6RANS
COt NAll IRANI
NOI NAII 6MAHI
HC CRAHS/KM
CO 6RANI/KH
NOX 6RANI/HN
FUEL CONIU«'T10N IT Cl L/IOOIN
RUN TINC
•»». EXN. OIVCEH
1ECONDI
PERCENT
OEC. C
OEO. C
KH
NEAIUREO OIITANCE
OFC. NCT (ORy)
1CP, «ET (ORY)
VOL (ICN)
UN (NEAIUREO)
CONPOIITI REIULT3
TEIT RUHICR 1M-I1
•ARONETER NH HB 734.1
HUMIDITY B/KC 11.«
TEMPERATURE OEI C tl.7
PVN
TOTAL
AVC.
PPOJECT I1-4771-BR1
VEHICLE NO. 14
DATE 4/ 9/71
•AC CART NO. 1
OTNO NO. 1
CVI NO. 1
DRY >UL9 TEKP. 11.7 OEC C(71.0 DEB
1 1
COLD TRANSIENT STABILIZED
79k. k (14.0) 'Ik. 4 (1 .1)
744.1 (14. () 7kt.o (3 .0)
43.3 (110.0) 43.3 (1 0.0)
400kl k47l
l.l/ 3/ 11 1 7/ 3/ 17
. '/ I/ Ik (/ 31 11
l.t/ 3/ .Ok 4 (/ 3/ .07
9k. O/ I/ 9k 4 7/ t/ 10
.I/ I/ 1 7/ t/ 1
1.01 11.14
177 114
tt(( I7(k
l.lk .74
l(.l 4.1
11.11 It. |1
100.43 411.01
1404. k 17(7,1
(.14 I. 11
t.K l.kl
K.10 kl.lt
111. ( 117.1
.41 .31
It. 41 17.10
(0( Ik'
4.19 t.((
101 Ikl
4(1 414
S.k4 t.lt
.401 ( .III)
1.000 ( .415)
10k. 1
11.11
FUEL 9ULPUR MB/KM 31.10 CARSON
EXH. OXTCEN PCT (.74 FUEL C
TI9T "EIGHT 1114 «C( 4100 LID
CA90LINC CH-341
OOOHCTER 4190 KN( l?04 NILE9)
P>
3 4
HOT TRANSIENT 9U9IL1IEO
744. J (14.1) 744.3 (14.9)
7kl.O (30.0) 7kl. (30.0)
41.1 (110.0) 49. (110.0)
40kll 4tll
10. »/ I/ 104 14 7 I/ 147
l.k/ J/ It Ik I/ Ik
.!/ 1' 7 7/ I/ It
4.k/ ]/ .07 4 t/ 3/ .07
30. 4/ if 31 11 4/ I/ i|
. 7/ I/ 1 4/ I/ 1
4. It 11. k4
140 111
177( 1311
1.10 .71
l°.l 11.1
1.11 11. k4
1(7.10 Ikl. 11
Ik71.4 1741.1
4.(1 I.It
1.4k 1.14
17. (4 (4.11
141.1 119.1
.74 ,4t
14. (t lk.4(
(09 Ik7
4.71 t.10
39k 174
414 449
(.70 k.ll
.410 ( .I4t)
1.000 ( ,47()
10k. 1
11.11
1-BAC (4
OIOIIOE G/KH 141.1 ( 1
1NSUHPTION L/100KN Ik. 41 ( 1
CATALT9T AVC. TEMP. DEC C 391 HYDROCARION9 (THC) C/«H 1.11 (
OIIOCS
Or NITROCEN G/KH !kl (
IAC)
l.l)
It.10)
1.04)
4)
1)
VEHICLE ENI19ION9 RE9ULT3 - NO AIR INJ. • 0.1.1.
PROJECT 11-4771-001
VEHICLE MODEL 71 FORO ORANAOA
ENOINE 1.4 1(101 CID) V-l
TEST NUMBER
TE9T CTCLE
RUN NUMOCP.
DATE
OOONtTEN
TEMPERATURE OEO. C (OES. O
RELATIVE HUMIDITY. PCT
•ARONETER, MN HC(IH HC)
RUN TIME, 3ECON09
•LONER DIP P MM. HtodN. M10)
•LONER INLET P ». HIO(IN. H>O)
•LONER INLET TEHP. DEC. C(OE«. p)
•LONE' REVOLUTION!
CV9 'L0» (TO. CU. METRE9(9CF)
NC IC«8NO METER/RANCE/PPM
co SAMPLE HETER/RAHCE/PPM
CO tC>»0 METER/RAHCE/PPM
cot SAMPLE MITER/RANCE/PCT
COt «C«t«0 MITCR/RANOE/PCT
NOI 9AHPLE NETCR/RANOE/PPN
NOI «C«e«0 NETER/RANOE/PPM
HC CONCCNTNtTION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC HA99 CRAHI
CO MAII CRAHI
COt MAII CRAMI
NOX HAM CRAMI
OPC, MET (DRY)
|CF, HCT (DRV)
VOL (ICH)
KM (NEAIUREO)
TE9I NUMBER.
•ARONETER.
HUNIOITT.
TENPERATURE.
TOTAL FUEL 9ULPUR.
AVO. E>M. OirCEHt
CATALT9T AVC. TEMP.
CATALT9T MAI. TCNP.
CARION DIOXIDE*
FUEL CONIUNPTION,
HYOIIOCA*tON9.
CARION MONOXIDE.
OIIOEI OF NITROCCN,
D/NC
OCC C
MB/KM
PCT
OCC C
OEC C
G/NH
LMOOKH
e/«N
O/KM
G/KM
VEHICLE NO. !•
TRANINI93ION A3
CV» 1113 «S( 4kll LID
m-tt
IET
I
4/ 1/71
4I04»N( I71INILE9)
1-1-1
II.I / 71.0
k(.4
714.4 (14.11)
114k
7Ik.4 (14.1)
7kl.O (10.0)
11.4 (111.0)
111401
104.4 (7411.3)
II.4/ I/ 1S4
l.l/ I/ 11
(4.It 3/ 1417
.!/ 3/ 7
TE9T NEICHT 1114 >G(
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4.1
CAROLINE EH-344
4000 Llll
1«( 11.1 HP)
HPCT
1
4/ 9/71
1-1-3
.Ot
31
3.4/ I/
17. 7/ i/
.k/ I/
1401
1.41
17.1
17.47
344.OS
(40fc.4
11.14
.174 ( .Ik')
1.000 ( .471)
104.4
11.44
J14.4
11. k
tt.l
11.01
4.11
437
(33
14k. i
11. kl
.10
K.kl
.70
13.1 / 74.0
(0.7
714.4 (14.11)
7kk
>(k.4 (14.1)
7kl.O (10.0)
41.3 (110.0)
HI 1
IK.4 ( 07(.l)
10.i/ r
•0.4/11
l.k/11
11
171
l.k/ 1 .0
k4.4/
l.l/ II
(I
144
I.Ik
kl.f
l.kk
4k. Ik
14J4.4
14.41
.1(4 ( ,14k)
1.000 ( .4711
111.4
Ik. 43
714.4
4.1
11.1
11.41
1.11
(04
S4k
114.1
10. 4b
.11
I.K
.IB
E-<)8
-------
TABLE E-48. TEST 145 HUSSIONS RESULTS
VN - !•« FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - NO AIR IMJ.
PROJECT 11-*771-IOI
TEST MO. l«S-ll RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 7S FORD ORkNADA
ENGINE ».R L(IOI cio> v-i
TRANSMISSION Al
ev> nil «G( »m LSD
•AMMETER in. 01 »N MCds.R* IN
MQ NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
•LORER OIF P NH. MIOMN. MIO)
BLO*ER INLET P MN. HlodM. HIO)
•(.OKU INLET TEHP. OI>. C(OEO. P)
ILOMER iievoLurioNi
CVS FLO* STO. CU. NETRE9(SCF)
HC timnt NETtR/RANCE/PPH
HC 1CKORO HETER/RAHCE/PPH
co SAMPLE METER/RANCE/FPH
co ior.no NitER/RANOE/ppH
COl SAMPLE HETER/RANCF./PCT
cot «C»GRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOI 9ANPLE HETER/RANGE/PPN
NOR SCK6RO METER/RANCC/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION ffn
CO CONCENIRATION "H
COl CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MA98 GRANI
CO MASS CRAH9
COf MA99 GRAH5
NOI MAIS 8RAN3
HC 6RAHS/HM
CO CRAMI/KM
cai OR*NS/«N
NOX 9RAN9/KH
'Utl. CONIUH'TIQN ir Ci L/1«0«H
RUN TIKI 9CCONOS
i»». t>H. 0«T4tN RtRCCNT
OTALT9T 'It. Ttxp. DEC. C
OT1LV1T N««. T[H>. Ott. C
NUIURtD DISTANCE UN
ore. XT (ONI)
3CF. >ET (OUT)
VOL (9C«1
«" (NCAtUReO)
COH»SITE RESULT)
TCST NUHHeM l«l-]l
•ARONCTER NM HO 711.1
HUNIDITT Q/K6 '10.1
Tt«»tR«tuRt DEC C G
OEG C
AVff. EXH. OXVGEN. PCT
CATALYST AVC. TEMP., OES C
CATALYST NAX. TEMP., DEC C
CARSON DIOXIDE, C/«M
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/IOOMH
HVOROCARSON3* C/RH
CARSON MONOIIOE, 0/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, C/KN
VEHICLE NO. n
TRANSMISSION Al
GV> 1111 Rt( ( S7I1HILES)
1-1-1
11.1 / 71.0
H.I
711. k (1R.OI)
7
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD R.I KR( 11.1 HP)
CASOLINC EH-1VV
HFET
R/I1/7S
• l.l
711.k (1R.OI)
>kk
7»R.l (IR.»)
> *.l (!».»)
1.1 (110.0)
kill*
1 1.7 (1011.S>
k .11 tl ki
1 .!/ I/
8 .•/!!/
.l/ll/
• .I/ I/ 1.11
.R/ II .07
k .tl tl kl
.I/ It I
Sk
its
1.77
IR.R
11
IkR
1
1.71
• k.l*
17IR.V
11. ••
.IkO ( .SSI)
i.aoa ( .Ml)
lit. 7
Ik. IS
711. k
1. 1
!*.•
11.7*
l.l'
til
>tl
tll.J
10. M
.11
I.RO
.77
E-19
-------
TABU E-«. TEST 151 EMISSIONS RESULTS
111 FTP VEHICLE EMIIIIOKS RESULTS - UNNOOIFIEO
TEST NO. 1S1-11 RUN 1
VEHICLE MOOEL 7S FORD HUBTANC II
ENGINE 1.1 L(I01 CIO) V-l
TRANSNI9SION Al
IV> 1117 KC( 1041 LIB)
BAROMETER 740.kk MM H0(24.1k IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 11 PCT
BUB RESULTS
BAC NUMBER
OISCRIPTION
BLOMER OIF P NN. HtOdN. HtO)
BLOWCA INLCT P MM. H?0(IN. HtO)
HOME* INLET TEMP. OEC. C(BEG. F)
BLO«e« REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOM SID. CD. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE "ETEH/RAHCE/PPH
HC BCIMO METER/RANCE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PPM
COt SAMPLE "ETEI/RANCE/PCT
COt 8CRGRO MEYER/RANGE/PCT
MOI SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
NOI BCIORO METER/RANCE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C01 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS CRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
COI MASS CRAMI
NOI MASS CP.AMS
HC IRAHI/NN
CO CRAMS/KM
COt CRAMS/KM
MOV CRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY Cl L/IOORH
RUN TIME SECONOS
AVC. EIH. OIYCEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVC. TEMP. 0(6. C
CATALYST MAI. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE IN
OFC, MET (0«V)
SCP, MET (ORY)
VOL (SCN)
Kit (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEIT NUMSCP. Ul-11
BAROMETER MM HC 710.7
HUMIDITY C/KC • l.f
TEMPERATURE OEC C II.I
PROJECT 11-1771-001
VEHICLE NO. If
DATE 1/11/71
BAC CART HO. 1
OYHD NO. 1
CVS NO. I
TCST miCHT l«ll «t( »00 IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.1 «N( lt.1 nr
9ASOLINC t"-3«»
OOOHCtO toil «H( llkO HILII)
ORV BULB TEMP, tt.t DEC C(71.0 OEC F)
ASS. HUMIDITY l.t CM/XC NOI HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
TOTAL FU(
AVG. EXH
CATALYST
CATALYST
1 t
COLD TRAHSIENT STABILIZED
7kt.O (10.0) 7kt. (30.0)
7kt.O (10.0) 7ki, (30.0)
41,1 (111.0) 41. (110.0)
10714 4171
7k. 2 (tkll.7) 124. (lflk.7)
lk.4/ I/ 174 H. It/ 144
.!/ I/ 2 1. Il/ 2
47. I/ I/ 1.14 kl. I/ 1.17
I.I/ I/ .07 4. I/ .01
lt.4/ 11 Ik II. t/ 11
.11 2/1 .1/1
k.40 1.11
HI 11
Ilk 117
1.71 .10
11.1 I.I
k.14 .4
71.11 10.7
2111.1 tktl.
k.ll f.l
1.01 .1
11. k7 l.|
111. I 111.
1.01 .1
14.10 11.11
SOf Ikl
3.30 6.34
414 134
kkk kll
f.74 k.14
.141 ( .111)
1.001 ( ,47k)
lok.l
11.41
L SULFUR HC/KM 34.10 CARBON
OXYOEN PCT s.3s FUEL c
AVG. TEMP. DEC C 511 MYDROC
MAX. TEHP. DEC C k71 CARSON
OXIDES
3
HOT TRANSIENT
7kt.O (30.0)
7k2.0 (30.0)
41.1 (111.0)
lOkfl
7k. 0 (tklS.k)
ll.l/ll/ 110
.7/1I/ 1
ll.'O/ I/ 1.70
l.k/ if .Ok
11. O/ If It
.7/ t/ 1
3.77
*|
1M
l.kl
11.1
1 . 14
17.11
1.71
.13
1.0k
114.7
1.01
17.11
fOf
1.95
44C
k7l
5.75
.101 (
1.000 (
OIOXIOE G/RM
)N8UMPTION L/IOOKH
RBONS.(THC) C/RN
HOMO I lot G/RM
OF NITROGEN C/RM
1
STABILIZED
7kt.O (10.0)
7ki.O (10.0)
11.1 (110.0)
klkOI
110.3 (IkOl. )
13. k/ if I
.S/lt/
kO.IX ]/ 1.0
i.1/ If .0
If. I/ if it
. 7/ If 1
It. 14
10
73
1.01
14. k
.72
11.11
dll.k
S.I4
.11
l.ll
lOf .1
.Ik
17.11
Ikl
).a$
ill
kOk
k.ll
.111)
.477)
IOk.1
11.11
1-IAfi (
411.0 (
ll.il (
.10 (
f.10 (
.14 (
(I-BAC)
( Hl.k)
17.11)
.11)
I.71)
.41)
1IT VEHICLE EKI99IONB RESULTS - UNNOOIFIEO
PROJECT 11-1771-001
VEHICLE XOOEL 'I FORO HUSTANO II
ENOINC 1.1 U10I CIO) V-l
TOT P.UHMH
t(JI CTCLE
RUN MUHSER
DATE
OOOHETE*
TENPERATUIE 016. C (DEO. F)
•CLArtvE HUHIOITT. PCT
BAROMETER, HH HC(1H HO)
RUN TIME, SECONOB
BLOKER OIF P MM. HtOdN. HtO)
BLOHER INLET P MM. HIOMN. HIO)
BLOREI INLET TEMP. OEC. UOEC. F)
BLOUE* REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOM ITO. CU. METRES(SCP)
HC
CO
cot
NOI
NOI
HC
CO
COt
NOI
HC
CO
COI
NOI
SCKGRD XETEI/RANCE/PPN
BCKGRO "ETER/RANGE/ppN
SIMPLE "ETEA/RANCE/PCT
BCRCRD "ETEa/RANCE/PCT
SAMPLE "ETER/RANGE/PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTHATION PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
MAIS GRAMS
HAII CRAMS
MASS CRAMS
MASS CRAMS
OFC, KM( 117imLES>
t - 1 - 1
11.1 / 7k.0
11.0
710.7 (tl.lk)
1147
7ki.O (10.0)
7kl.o (30.0)
11.1 (110.0)
111117
104.1 (711t.l)
II.k/ I/ Ik
lk.0/ i/ Ik
1k.l/ll/ IB
1.1/I1/ 1
It.S/ I/ 1.71
I.I/ 3/ .07
II.O/ i/ II
.4/ t/ 1
tt
41
I.k7
f 7.t
t.ki
It.II
kltS.1
il.kl
.170 ( .Ikl)
1.000 ( ,47k)
101.4
tl.Sk
Kl-li
710.7
I.I
tl.1
17.11
2.9S
ilt
kSi
tll.O
It.Bl
.It
1.01
1.00
E-50
TEST MEICHT 1111 K0( 1100 LBS)
ACTUAL KOAO LOAO l.t «•( 11.1 HP)
CABOLIW EN-111
111-11
HFET
1
f/11/7B
IOkk«M( ItSlMLES)
i - 1 - 1
21.1 / 71.0
17.1
71B.7 (11.1k)
7kf
7kt.O (10.0)
7ki.O (10.0)
13.1
kl
llf .1
40.
II.
41. /I
71.
1.
I.
71.1
l.kl
l.kl
I4K.1
Ik.11
.III ( .111)
1.000 ( .471)
111.1
Ik.17
151-11
740.7
4.1
11.1
21.01
i.as
soi
kSt
J7t.7
11.k*
.10
.If
1.01
-------
TABU E-50. TEST 151 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVH - 111 FTP VEHICLE EHISSIOHI ROULTI - RICH HIT IOLI
TtM NO. isi-n HUH i
VEHICLE HWEL >• 'OHO HUITING II
ENGINE 4.4 l(10< CIO) V.I
TRANINISIION it
>«» IIS7 ««( 40M LID
•ARCHETER 740.kk NN H6(24.1k IN HO)
RELITIOE HUMIDITY .1 PCT
•10 RESULTS
646 NIJNOER
DESCRIPTION
•LONER OZP P NX. HIOCIN. H20)
•LONER INLET * HH. H|0(1N. H20)
ILO«l« INLET TEHP. DEC. C(OE«. P)
ILONER REVOLUTIONS
Cvl FLON STO. Cu. HETRES(SCF)
HC IAHPLE HCTEP/RANCE/PPn
HC IC«G«O NETEI/RANSE/PPN
co SA.HPLC NEUH/RAHSE/PPN
co IC«««D NETER/RANGE/PPH
C0| SANPLE HETER/RANBE/PCT
cot IC«CAO HETEI/RANGE/PCT
NOI SANPLC HETCR/RANGE/PPN
HOI IOCRO HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C0» CONCENTRATION PCT
NOt CONCENTRATION PPH
HC mlS if ft
CO "All CRAMS
CO! "All CRAN3
HOI "ASS GKAHJ
HC GRAHS/«H
CO 8RAHI/«N
to; S»ANS/«H
NOI CRAHS/HH
FUEL CONSUMPTION IT C9 L/100KH
•UK IIH( SECONDS
AVa. EIM. OIVCEN PERCENT
CATALYIT AVG. TEN*. OCG. C
CATALYST DAI, TEN*. Ota. C
NCAIUMCO DISTANCE KM
ore. "II coir)
SCr, »ET (0»T)
voi. <«c«l
KN (HEASUDEO)
CONPOSITE KESUI.TS
111' NUHH* 111-11
H»0»EIEK HH HC 710.7
HUN1DITT 0/NB • «.^
TEH'EDATUM DEC C II.0
PROJECT 11-4771-001
YtHKlE »0. 15
DATE k/ S/71
SAC C«HT NO. 1
OVNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY S1IL* TEHP. 2S.O DEC C(77.0 DEC F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 4.1 SM/HS
TEST "EIGHT 1511 «k( 1SOU LHS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAO 1.2 M»( 12.j HP)
GASOLINE EN-3H
OOOHfcTIH 2401 KN( 1143 riLLfS)
MOV NUKtOITY CO«»
7k2.0 (30. U)
41.1 (llu.O)
7S "(Jkll.l)
.*/ I/ 11
4.3/ I/ .07
IS. I/ 2/ Ik
I.I/ 2/ 1
7.14
211
3k31
1.S3
4».2
12. k3
131. SI
Ilia. i
k.2S
2.04
31.41
310. 1
1.01
17.14
104
3.45
111
Sll
.14)
1.000
2 3
ITAIILIZEO HOT THANSIEIlT
7k2.0 (30
7k2.0 (30
43.1 (11
130.3 (Ik
21. / I/
2. / 3/
. / 3/
1. / 3/
11. / 2/
1. / I/
11.1k
217
ISIS
.12
11.1
Ik. 31
Ilk. IS
1114.4
3.11
2.kk
k3,OI
110.1
.Si
It.ik
Ik?
3.65
111
Sil
k.12
C -US)
( .110)
20k. i
12.17
TOTAL FUEL SULPUR HC/KH 37. Sk
AVG. EKH. OIVCEH PCT } 70
CATALYST AVC. TEHP. DEG C. 432
CATALYST NAI. TEHP. OCG C SRI
0) 7kl.U (30.0)
0) 71.2.0 (30.0)
3.0) 43.4 (ill.o)
4UkOk
231 2S.li/ )/ 2SO
23 2.3/ 3/ tt
(TER/RAHGE/PCT
HOI SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
NOI ICKSRO NETER/RANCE/PPN
HC CONCCNIIAT1DN PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COI CONCENTIATION PCT
HOI CONCENTRATION PPN
HC HAS9 CRANS
CO HASt «•>»•
COI HASS tRAHS
NOI HASS tRAHS
D'C. NET (DRV)
«CF, NET (DRV)
VOL CICH)
«H (HEAIURED)
TEST NUHtER'
•AROHETER.
HUH10ITY,
TEHPERATUIE,
TOTAL FUEL lUL'URi
AVC. EIH. OIYGEN.
CATALYST >V«. U"P.,
CIRRON DIOIIDE,
FUEL CONSUHPIION.
HYDROCARBONS*
CARRON NON01IOE.
OIIOES OP NITROCEN.
PVHT
NH HQ
t/«S
OEC C
HG/NN
PCT
OEG C
C/KN
L/100KI
6/KN
6/KH
G/KN
VEHICLE NO. IS
TRAHSHlllION Al
CVII 1117 «G( 1045 HI)
151-22
SET
1
k/ t/71
243IKM( 1S11HILE9)
2-1-3
11.1 / 74.0
74(1.2 (24.11)
1317
7k2.0 (10.0)
'ki.O (30.U)
41.1 (110.0)
111247
210.0 (741S.C)
Ik.I/ I/ Ikl
L.I/ */ 14
SI.I/ 3/ 11k3
.!/ 3/ 2
17.k/ I/ l.kl
4.0/ 3/ .Ok
47.2/ 2/ 47
t.l/ 2/ 1
IIS
1111
1.17
4k.2
17.50
111.1k
k054.l
H.S2
.Ik7 ( .ISk)
1.000 ( .473)
21U.O
11.44
151-22
740.2
10.7
23.1
21.01
3.55
S31
kkl
271.7
11.10
.11
IS.kl
.Ik
TEST HEIGHT 1511 *i;(
ACTUAL *UAO LOAD l.i
GASOLINE EH-311
*N( 12.* "t*)
151-83
HPCT
1
k/ S/71
24!1KM( 1SI4NILES)
2-1-3
2b.
7»0.
7ki.
7kt.
41.
US.
41.7
11.2
11.7
.1
47.1
1.4
71.1
1.2
.13
1.00
.0
1.1
(21.11)
Tkl
110.0)
(10.0)
(111.0)
1511
(1UkS.2)
>/ 11
2/ II
ll/ 110
li/ 2
2/ 2.13
.07
73
1
2/
I/
71
IIS
.07
1.1
S.21
LSI
70. k
5.12
( .111)
( .172)
S.I
.11
1S1-I1
710.2
4.4
2k.7
24.43
1.50
kk4
2kk.k
11.k)
.32
3.15
.44
E-51
-------
NO. IH-II *U** I
IH1CLI MODCL '• FOItO MUSTANG [1
N0INC 1.4 L()DI CIO) V-l
*RO«ETEI» 717.
€ I* rive Kunio
AC RESULTS
• LOHCII OIF * NH. H20UN. H20)
•LONE* INLET f NM. N?0(IN. M*0
BLQMM INLET TEHF-. occ. CCDEO.
PLONK* RCVOLUTIONS
CV| FLOH 3TO. CU. NETRESCSC')
MC SAMPLE HerER/*Aw«/'»**w
HC SCKSftO HETEw/KAMCE/P^N
CO SA«»LE "i TErl/aAWCe/PPN
CO BC«CRO Mf TeR/RANce/PPH
C0| SAMPLE "ETCR/KANCE/PCT
C0« BCKGRD NEIE*/*ANCe/PCT
NOI SAttPLl H«TER/RANCE/PPN
HOI BCMCftO *eTER/*ANee/PPH
LULUUQM FACTOR
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCe*T*A,UQH PP*
C0» CONCENTflATIOf PC T
MOI CPNCCNTttATIOX MM
HC «»•» G*»H8
CO NAS9 6AAMS
cot MAIS CH*H$
HOI HtS» Q*AH»
MC CRAH8/N)*
CO CMfcMfl/Mn
COJ 6NAMO/NN
c*rnr«TA«6. TCHP. DEC. c
CATALYST MAI. TfHP. OtC. C
NEA9URCO 013T4MCE KM
Oft, *«T (D«Y)
jcr, MET co*v)
VOL tSCfl)
Kf* (HCASUKEO)
IMLE £-51. TEST 151 EMISSIONS RESULTS
111 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RICH VEST
PROJECT 11-47J1-U01
VEHICLE NO. 19
OATE k/ k/7S
1AC CART NO. 1
OVNO NO. »
TEST nfciem ISB» *ut jsou LKS
ACTUAL RUAO LOAD 1.1 *»{ »?.j
CASULIHC E •*-!»»
DftT BULB fEHP. 23.« OCC C(75.tl DEC
ABS. HUMIDITY ID.5 li*/KG
COLD TRANSIENT
NOR HUHIOITT CUHNECTIUN FACTU»*
G/K6
DEC C
TOTAL PU
CATALYST
CATALYST
7(>2,0 (3tl.n) 7t>2.0 C31.fl) 7h2.il (Id. 0)
71*2.0 (30.0) 7fc2,0 (30.0) 7bB».Q OQ.r))
».!U<"».»! 124.b"?{?74.0( 7«.:°("u.M
US/ 3
.!/ 3
4.2/ 3
I.I/ 2
*•
3U
1 . *
40.
\ .
2t .
IS 1. / 3/ IS 1.3/ 3/ 1
2bbl 17. / 3/2M7 1J . J/ )/ 194
. / 3X 7 Ii/ 3/
.0 .2»> CAABON DIOXIDE C/KN
AVC. TCHF. DIG C *38 HrO«OCAHMON9 (THC) G/K*
'b2.U (3U.O
»•»«..! O0.»
*3.3 (.11)'.
I.'/ J/
.f/ 3/
SU.*/ 3/ .
I.*/ «/
11.81
Ik)}
2229
.•I
1*. J
1). ?U
JJS.J1
"KM
a.2S
S* . *U
114.11
.S7
17. bO
-ib7
J.80
«t>j*>
»J j j
to. 17
. 44* )
.^74)
11. ^5
I1H.O
*'"
j
>
I' J
1
n
IS
1
<
!
PVM . 1|J SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - A1CH BEST IDLE
VEHICLE KOOIL
rcsr NUHSEK
tEST CTCLI
HUN NUNBCH
one
ODOffETEH
cva - a*o C*KT • orNinoMeTEi*
TE«»E"»IU«E DEC. e mt. 11
KCLATIVC HUMIDITY, PCT
• ••OH[i(», m HCIIN HC)
"UN TIME, IECOKOS
. DEC. C(DEC.
•LONCM REvuLUTIONa
CVS 'L0« jrd. CU. "EI«E1(SC')
NC S«H»LE HETEH/««NCE/»P«
MC QCNCflO HCTeR/»»MGE/»PH
co SAMPLE »ETE«/RANGe/pp*
CO 0CNCKO METER/RAHGE/PCN
CQ< SAMPLE MCTER/tANCC/PCT
C0> BCK6HO HETEA/tt«NCE/PCT
NO< »c«s«o «itc«;««Hce/«»«
MC CONCENTRATION P^M
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
coi ca«cCHT«>uo» PCI
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS CRAMS
CO «>M 4«»»S
COf MASS 6RA"9
NOX MASS CRAMS
DFC, »E1 tlj»1)
SCr, XT (DRV)
VOL (SCM)
KM 1»E<«UR(D)
TEJf NUMBER. P*MT
BAROMETER, MM H6
HUMIOITT, S/«S
TEMPERATURE, OCC C
TOTAL 'UEL SULFUR^ MC/KM
AVC. EKH. OxrCEN. PCT
CATILTST AVC. TEMP., DEC C
CATALYST M». TEMP., DEC C
CARSON DIOXIDE, G/NM
'UEL CONSUMPTION, L/IOOXM
MYODOCADBONJ, G/«M
CARBON MONOIlOE, C/XM
OXIDES Of NITROGEN. G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 15
TRANSMISSION A)
CVH iiS7 -S( .)04< LSS)
1SI-32
SET
1
b/ if/71
|MfKN( 1IV1HILCS)
T^I.Q oa.a)
7b2.0 (30. 0)
«J.< (111.0)
uio't
iOl.t (Jikl.k)
1S.7/ J/ IS
I.!/ )/
$«.!/ J/ 1"
TEST «EII;»T isi
ACTUAL 40AO LOAD
l.bU
»3.'
17. Si
Ib.ib
.Ski ( .15))
l.UOO ( .17k)
2.60
S»0
.to
IS. 7k
.77
!SKKM( likSMILESJ
i - 1 - )
7.7
(10.01
(Icl.u)
(lli.U)
IkSO
(4011.1)
It 17
S7.1
17.1
IS.»
l.S
17. k
i.s/
71. «/
2/ 17
II/ *07
Ii/ S
2.IS
.07
7|
73
111
2.04
70.1
*.i2
4347.3
14.11
.lib ( .130)
1.000 ( .<72)
II*.7
Ifc.'t
ik.l
21.4k
.
571
hkl
2k7. t
11. kS
E-52
-------
TABLE E-52. TEST 152 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVH . HI FTP (CHICK EH1II10NS REIULTI - UHH001MEO
tor id. in-ii RUH i
VEHICLE HOOEL 'I FORO HUSTAHC II
IHB1NE •.' L(10< CIO) v-t
TRAHIHIStlOH >1
OK |II7 KG( »OM LIS)
«»»OHCit» »M.»I HH "ecu.11 to «t1
RELATIVE HUHIOITV ,» PCI
OESCRIPTIOM
SLOWER DIP P HH. H10UH. M10)
•LOWER IHLCT p NH. MjodN. HZO)
BI.OMER IHLCT TEHP. OEG. KOEG. P>
ILOHER REVOLUT10H3
CVS PLUM 3TD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RAHGE/PPH
HC ICKGRO HETER/RAMGE/PPM
CO SAHPLt METER/RAHGE/P'M
CO BCKCRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
C0» SAHPV.I HIHR/RAH6E/PC1
COf BCKGRO MCTER/RANGE/PCT
HOI SAHPLE METER/RAHOE/PPH
HOI BCKCRO METER/RAHCE/PPH
OILUTIOH FACTOR
HC COMCEHTRATIOH PPM
CO COHCCHTRAT10H PPM
C0> COHCEHTRAT10H PCT
HOI COHCCHTRATION PPN
HC MASS CRAM!
CO MASS gRAM]
CO; HAI3 EUAHS
HC ft«AM3/KH
CO SMHS/KH
CO) CRAHS/KH
HOI CRAMS/KH
rutl COK9UHPT10H >V Cl L/tOOHH
RUH T1HE SECOH01
AVC. OH. OIVCIH PERCEHT
CATALTST 1VG. TEHP. OEC. C
CATALTST HAH. TEtiP. DCS. C
MEAIUIEO DISTANCE KH
OPC. "CT (ORt)
SCP, "CT (DOT)
VOL (SCH)
«" (HEAIUREO)
COHPOSITC RESULTS
TEST HUHICR UJ-JI
BAROHCTER HH H6 ?«1.4
HUHlOITV C/K6 ' I.I
TEHPCRATUM DEC C l«.l
PROJECT 11-1711-!.J (110.0)
4071$
11. */ 3/ ll»
. 7/ 3/ 7
II. i/ 9/ IK
!./ .07
II. I/ >/ I<
l.h/ I/ I
1.11
7ki.
'»i.
• i.
1.
'1.
iO.
Ik.
t .
Jk.l
I.I
) (10.0)
) da.O)
(110.0)
RU7
I/ *
I)/ It
I!/ 11
]/ 1.00
!/ .01
i/ Ik
£/ L
11.11
7k2.0 (10.0)
7ti.O (30.0)
<1.1 (110.0)
VUW2
7.»/ i/ 7
IO.O/K/ 110
k.1/11/ 11
71. 7/ I/ 1.31
!.«/ I/ .01
tl.l/ II *'
l.l/ II
tNGIHE •.' L(1D1 CID) V-l
TEST NUHIt"
TEST CTCLI
RUH MUHBER
OATE
OOOHETER
CVS - »E CART • OVHAHOHETCR
TEHPERATURE OEG. C (OEG. F)
RELATIVE HUMIOITV. PCT
BAROMETER, «H MM IN HS)
RUH IIHC, SECOHOS
ILOMER OIF P HH. H10(IH. HIO)
BLOWER IHLtT P HH. H10(1H. HIO)
BLOHER IHLET TEMP. OEG. C(OCG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIOH3
CVS FLOW STO. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAHPLE METEI/RAHGE/PPH
HC BCKGRO MCTEI/RANGE/PPH
co SAHPLE METER/RAHGE/PPH
CO BCKCRO METER/RAHGC/PPH
COt SAHPLE MCTER/RAHGE/PCT
coi BCKGRO METEI/RAHGE/PCT
HOI SAHPLE METER/RAHGE/PPH
HOK BCKGRD KITCR/RAMM/PPH
HC COHCEHTIATIOH PPH
CO COMCEHTRATIOH PPH
COt COHCCHTRATIOH PCT
H0« COHCEHTRATIOH PPH
HC MAIS CRAH3
COI HAS3 GRAHI
HOI HASS CRAHS
OFC, MET (ORV)
SCP, HET (ORV)
VOL I SCH)
KH (HEA3UREO)
TEST NUHDH, PVHT
BARQHCTCR, MH HC
HUHIOITVf G/KG
TEHPERATURE, DEC C
AVC. EIH. OXVGENf PCT
CATALTST AVG. TEHP.* DEC C
CATALVST HAH. TCI"., OCG C
CARBDH OIOXIOE. G/KH
FUEL COH9UHPT10H, L/100KH
VEHICLE HO. II
TRAMSHISJ10H 11
GVM 1117 KS( %tm
111-11
SIT
TEST MIGHT 1IIB KG( 1100 LIB)
ACTUAL ROAO L0«0 <.J >«( 11.1 HP)
CASOLIHE EH.]«<
Ik.l / 74.0
10. k
7»1.» (K.1M)
11M
7kl.O (10.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
*1.3 (110.0)
111111
110.1 (7«
-------
TABU E-53. TEST 152 EMISSIONS RESULTS
- 1(1 FI» VCHlClE e«U51UN« IKIULTS - 1CNITION
TEST NO. 152-M HUN 1
ewBiNf. 1.4 L<3ot CIO) *-•
TRANSMISSION A)
t»- IIS7 KG( 40M LBS)
BAG NF9UL1S
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
ALONE H OIF P MM. N20(IN. H?U)
BLONER INLET TINP, DEG. MDEG. F)
KLONER REVOLUTIONS
DILUTION FACTOR
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
HC "ASS GRAMS
CO i»»3 GRAMS
NO* "ASS CHAMS
CO CHANS/MM
«UN TIME SECONDS
AVC. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
"EA3U«SO DISTANCE Hh
OrC, ttfT
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMPEW is«-ai TUFA
VEHICLE NO.
BAG CART NO.
OTNO NO.
CVS NO.
0«Y HUL9 TEMP.
A«8. HUHlUITY
774.7 (30.5)
'74.7 (30.4)
41. 9 (llfl.O)
10720
.•/ I/ 8
.V 3/ 20
3.0/ 3/ .05
l.b/ 11 i
7Q»
31.20
2?lb.-»
5.37
ll.lfc
381. 3
l.*2
17.77
o.ou
"li
-11
.400
1.000
11
1
3
i
11. 7 DEC CC71.0 DEC
«.3 i-VuS
2
9TARILI2ED
7 1.7 (30. SJ
3.3 (110. U)
1 0.7 (Iblb. 1
3 .?> 2/ 3
* .1/127 10
13.S/12/ 2
F)
3
HOT TMANSUNT
' 4.7 (30. S)
1.3 (110.0)
b.3 (2b44.2)
1 .h/ i/ lib
1.0/ 3/ .Oh l.b/ J/ .Ok
1.5/ 2/ 2 l.S/ 2/ 2
12.10 «.S4
30 t J4,
1.01 1.48
11.5 4 .5
2.2 .1
11. S 1 .»
2411. 20 3.
8.2 .2
.3 .0
3B8. JSb.
1.3 1.0
lb.7 1S.S2
8b7 %OS
1.10 3,20
bll $4«
b87 734
b.22 5.74
( .840) .404 (
( .*'b) 1.000 (
207.1
12.01
S.bl CAB6UN DIOUDE G/KM
3.U' FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
$2S HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
734 CAM60N MONOXIDE C/KM
OXIOC9 OF NlfROUiN G/KM
9IADILIZEO
J7».7 (10. S)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110. U)
130.8 (4kl8.2)
30. J/ 2/ 3(J
7.H/ e/ •
2.H/ 3/ .114
i.4/ a/ <
13. Ul
23
27
32. J
1.7
2347.
7.7
.2
.b
37*.
1,«5
It. 28
4.04
»34
b.14.
.1 8)
.4 7)
20 .a
-«A (,.
»i. ( 3
b.b { i
l.S (
l.'< (
HA )
S. )
.S )
.b )
.is)
VEHICLE MUDEL 78 FORD MUSTANG n
ENGINF 1.4 L(302 CIU) VI
TEST NUWMER
TEST UCLE
OATE
DOOMCTt*
RUN I I
HL1WER
HLl»€K
IfiLET TEMP. «C.
REVOLUTIONS
«CHf,RC i
9AMPLC I
BCKr.RO i
HC CO"CCNt9AItON PMM
cor cnnccNTRArtuN PCT
NOW CONCENTRATION PPM
we MASS CRAMS
CO MASS CAAN.4,
DK,
SCF,
(KH)
(MEASURED}
HiPOHfllK,
f Uf L CUNSUttPl f ON,
HTf>*OCAflflONS,
CI»«UN nnNOitloe,
oiTues of NITUOCEN,
G/HC
DEC C
PCT
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - IGNITION MISFIRE
PROJECT 11-1771-U01
TRANSMISSION A3
e - t - 3
771.7 (30.5)
774.7 (JW.J)
(110.0)
2142
(7VUO.
10
204.
10.)
.7
l.b
bS.Z
1.1
I/
12/ 21
02. b
.Rb ( .
1.00 ( .
204. b
21.84
iJ.li
2.81
2. Ife
1.34
ACTUAL ROAQ LOAD
GASOLINE EM-IM
4.2 KM 12.3 MP)
HfET
1
7/?b/78
2-1-3
iJ.9 f 17.0
7k.I
7411.7 U'.lb)
7bS
774.7 (30.5)
7 4.7 (jo.5)
4,1 (112.0)
.b/ I/
.O/ II
.0/13/
.0/I3/
,M 2/ 2.1
.I/ «/ .0
.3/ 3/ *
.f/ */
10
2N.11
.8*0 ( .P21)
i.aua ( .ib2)
114.7
lb.2B
1S2-93
MO. 3
1R.4
27.1
24.tb
1.51
711
787
270.2
11. bO
.21
.44
1.73
-------
TABU £-54. TEST 152 MISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. i»i-3i RUN i
tNc.Hf ,.« mm cio) v.(
tNkNSmSSlON A3
"ELAM»E HUHIOITT 5% r»CT
•in "«u*«iteR
OESCR|"TIOM
ftLnwER OIF P HH. HtotIN* H*O>
cvs FLU* sio. cu. "ErfrtsiscF)
UlLUMUH FACTUH
MC CONCENTRATION PP*
COP -UBS CMAMS
HC BRAH8/KN
CO CRAMS/AN
NOl CRAMS/KM
RUN M"C SECONDS
VUL (sen)
KH [MEASURED)
HIIMfOItV C/KC lulu
TEHPERATIIHE OEG C *J.3
PROJECT ll**?7l-U01
VEHICLE 00. * TEST NEI6HT ISBN Kt( 1500 LaS)
4AC CAR! NO. GASOLINE (M-JM
A63. HUHIOITI in.u SH/PIG NO* NOMIDITT CUBHCCUU* FACIOH
i i 3 i
COLO TRAMSHMT STABU1IED HOT TftANSlEM 3l»BKUtO
3»^!3 (i^.S) 7»^l3 (ZVS) ?»^.3 (J^.S) J«^.3 U*!s>
t».3 (110. U> *«.• (10^.0) »B.I (10^.0) *>.3 (ItU.O)
tU?Ul 70LBS «UbJl »^tol»
t.O/ )/ 10 11. 0/ 2/ 11 .^/ 3/ ^ ll.L./ */ 11
.b/ 3/ M b.*/12/ 1? *.3/U/ 8 fl.J/13/
!>.!/ 3/ 1.V1 fcO.W JX 1.0' II. »/ i/ l.S) S^.l/ 3/ l.U
t.3/ 3/ .07 «.•/ 3/ .07 ».»/ 3/ .0' »,•»/ ?/ .0
l.O/ 2/ 1 .?/ «/ 1 ."»/ £/ 1 .»/ i/
T.%1 1?.*0 H.bO l«, us
T»I sh i** a*
i.Sk 1. 01 l.»fc .»*
!?.}• l.i» *.l^ l.>*
b5.7T l.hl l».0^ *.^i
1171. S M1«.U 20*0. k «3Sk.7
s.72 .10 i.oj .e»
11. ki? l.ti J.th .71
i.ih i.«o 1.13 i.*e
SDfc Bbb fcOb •*»
3,-»» l.BO 3.1^ -».0^
*t* hll ftl> b3(
S.bb fc.U S.73 *.l"
.401 ( .*^t) .40? ( .I»J)
UOOU { .497) 1.000 ( .*?•}
in).* «0b.k
11. 7B 11.^3
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR M<*/KM Jfc.UI CAHtfON 010MDE G/N1 ] 3-1 (
AvC. EKN. oiY6E*4 PCT s.t; »uCL CUNSUMPTIQN L/lUQKh i .»! C
CATALV9T *Vft. TtHP. DEG C i>
.JO)
VEHICLE MODEL 71 ?Q*Q HU8TANC II
ENfiINC ^.^ L(10f CIO) V-|
TE9T NUMhtB
TEST CTCLE
NUN NU«H€R
OATE
rEHPERATMRE UE6. C
PCt
N HP,)
«IT(»
6. P)
HAAOM1TCR, MM
RUN MMF, SECUNOA
DLOHER OIF P HM. H^o(lN. H«U)
ftLOMEft IflLET P HH. HJO(IN. H*(|)
ILOMCH INLET TfMP. DEC. C(OEG. F)
CVS
MC »C«GBO
CO SAMPtt
CO BC«r.»o
cop s»r»Ptt
C02 flCMIfHD
STO. cu. NCTMFSISC')
.( Mf.TcR/«*HCC/PPM
O «tTEB/R4NCE/PPM
NUV HCKdRO HrTCD/RANkC
Hf CUNceNIAAl 1IIN PPP
CU COMCCNTPAT10N PPM
C02 CIWCENTIIAIIUN PCT
NO! CONCf.MRAl ION PP"
COP NA5S GBAfS
WOX HAS3 fiRAMS
m«ON[Tf«,
niP"loITt,
PVKT
HB HC
a/Nr.
DIG C
T./KH
CATAI.>9T AVO. Tr«P., die C
CATALTiT HAI. TIHP., OtC C
CARBON OlOXIOCf G/KH
HJfL CONSUMPTION, -L/innKn
HTOROCARBON9, G/KN
CAOflON HONOI10C. G/KH
OIIOIS or NITKOCtN, C/«>>
99 T
VEHICLE NO.
VEHICLE EM9IIOM1 RESULTS . IGNITION
PROJECT 11-1771-001
2-1-1
22.1 / 71.0
kl.t
71'.' (2'. 13)
ll'l
13.1 1110.0)
112201
210.2 17*2>.l)
'.!/ I/ '3
.'/ J/ '
70.S/12/ IkO
«.«/!»/ «
II. '/ If l.bl
l.l/ 2/ 1
• I
l»»
l.kl
bb.t
10.32
11.31
b2".'
ik.'l
.171 ( .Ikl)
1.1)00 ( .'71)
210.2
21. IS
152-32
71'.'
in.'
22.1
2b.72
(ill
7k'
211.1
12. »7
I.k2
1.23
THT ktlGM 15«
ACTUAL 90AD L0«0
OIOlIKt CM-)"
'.2 KN( 12.1 HP)
IS2-11
HFCT
7/27/71
2 - 1 -
ll.i
73'.' (2'.11)
7k(
71'.] (21.5)
71'.9 42*.*)
ii.l (iin.n)
kl'io
lli.l (IOkl.1)
77.)/ tf 77
11.0/ 2/ 11
7f.0/ll/ S7
'.O/ll/ '
1b.7/ 2/ 2.10
1.7/ 2/ .Ok
2'.2/ 3/ IR
.k/ I/ 2
I. ii
Ik
2.05
•k.l
1.52
b.21
1111.1
17.11
.112 ( .137)
1.000 ( .'7t)
lli.l
Ik.2'
152-31
73'.'
l.kq
731
2H.k
11.3k
E-55
-------
1ABLE E-S5. TEST IS! EMISSIONS RESULTS
id FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS . UNOOOIFIEO
TEST NO. 113-11 RUN i
VEHICLE MODEL 71 FORD MU81ANC II
ENCINE 1.1 L(ioi clo) >-i
TRANSMISSION 1]
GV» us? «G( 1015 LBS>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ti PCT
•1C RE9ULT9
BAG NUMBER
0£9C«I'TIO»
OLO«ER OIF P MM. HIOUN. «20>
8LO»ER I»L£T TE»pi Hit. cioEG.
BLONER REVOLUTIONS
CV9 FLON 9TO. Cu. HET»E9
KH (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 111-11
BAROMETER MN HG >»0.>
HUMIDITY C/KG 10.7
TEMPERATURE DEO C Z1.7
COLO TRANSIENT
,,,>3 (?«.}. 5>
Vull (Z4.S)
»».3 (1111. 0)
10717
l.J/ 3/ 1]
i.;/ 3/ 27
i?. i/ )/ i.nt
3,4/ */ .Ob
1.5X Z/ 2
','t
Ml
13
l.l
II.
h. 0
79. 2
2 1*1.0
7. ?*
1.13
It.*'
lit.'
l.J*
17.3S
511%
2,*4
>**
Sll
5,7*
.401
1.000
STABILIZED
"'.3 (24.5)
"H.3 (24.5)
»>.} (110. U)
S*.2/ I/ .
3.V 3/ .
i.Si.
1.0
19.0
IbS
3.b^
1%^
ilfc
t.Q7
.•^1)
. 17S)
20I>.I
11.10
HOT T-lAMSIENT
"^. (2«.51
7«>^. ( {•). f )
13. (111.0)
0715
7b. (2ti^«.3)
bO.t/12/ 1)5
S.3/U/ ^
70. 7/ 3/ 1.21
«.•>/ 3/ ,0?
l.l/ «/ 1
1U.M
9)
120
i.21
J'.h
1.17
10. h«
Ib'h. 7
1.71
.20
1.117
i-nj.o
1.01
14. 7^
&0b
1.32
101
«12
S.73
.^l^ (
1.000 (
CATALYST AVC. it**, oefi c
31 rtrOBQCABtJO
oxioes or
"PTION L/10QKH
••a (INC) 5/*«
NlTRQCf. C/NN
51»6lLiiEO
'14.3 (2 .5)
71^.3 (2 .*)
*1.3 (1 U.l>)
b^SS
130.1 (i 07.
17, b/ j»/ l
b2.2/13 5
SS.U/ i .^
<.fc/ 3 .n
27, ^/ 2 j
l.O/ 2
13. 0
1
.^0
27. a
.bl
fc.ll
21S0.2
b.73
.10
1.00
3il.3
1.10
IS. 07
• bb
I.Ob
157
SOI
b.12
.105)
.*7b)
«0b.7
11. iS
3-8*6
312.7
1». SI (
.i» <
3.71 i
1.10 (
)
(1-BA6J
312.7)
.3b>
3* 73}
1.11)
VEHICLE MODEL 71 FORD MUSTANG II
ENGINE 1.1 L<90I CIO) V-l
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAG CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE UEG. C (OEG. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY. PCT
BAROMCKR, MH HCU« HG)
RUN HUE, SECONDS
BL.OHER DIF P MM. H20UM. H20)
BLOMER INLET p MM. HIOUN. «*o)
«L1»f» INLET TEMP. DEG. CCOEG. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
CV9 FLOM STO. CU. HET«ES(3Cf)
HC BC«C«D METER/RANCE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKCRO METEH/RANGE/PPM
cor SAMPLE METEM/RANGE/PC)
COI BCKGMO METER/RANCC/PCT
NOI SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOI SCICRD METER/RANCC/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COI CONCENTRATION PCI
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
NC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
COI MASS CRAMS
NOI MASS CRAMS
DFC. NET (DRV)
9CF. »ET (DRV)
VOL (9CM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER. PVMT
BAROMETER. MN HG
HUN1D11V, C/HC
TEMPERATURE, OEC '.
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR. MG/KH
AVC. E'H. DXTCEMr
CARBON DIOXIDE,
PCT
OEC c
DEC C
G/MH
HYDROCARBON9, G/KH
CARBON MONOXIDE, ' G/KM
DI11DES OF NITROCIN, C/»H
SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-1771-001
VEHICLE NO. 15
TRANSMISSION A3
CVB 115) «G( 1015 LBI)
159-11
SET
UNMODIFIED
I/I1/7S
2-1-3
22.1 ' 73.0
50.1
710.1 (21.17)
I lib
711.1 (2
711.3 (2
11.3 (1
11211
210. 3 (7
21. O/ 2
1.7/ 2
12.2/1)
1.1/13
l.J/ '
53. b/ 2
l.J/ i
.5)
.5)
n.n)
27.7)
21
10
bO
1
.07
51
1
S2.
i , •
13.IS
1«.<2
.174 ( .170)
1.000 ( .OS)
210.
11.1
159
710.
1.
22.
20.•
2.1
SI
hi
2«0.
12.D
TEST HEIGHT 1511 «C( 3900 LD9)
ACTUAL ROAD LUAO 1.* KM( 12.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3H
153-11
HFET
1
1/11/71
b115KM( 1005MILES)
2-1-3
22.S / 73.0
in.l
71".! (21.17)
7bb
'.3 (
'.3 (
3.3 (
bll
5.J (
3/ 2
I/ 2
1/13
7/13
1 5/ 2
13/2
1.5)
1.5)
10.0)
b
073.1)
21
10
5h
3
' .05
1
•>.••*
tnno. i
13.11
.•ts ( .i
l.oon ( .^
115. J
it.zt
il.9
17.11
SI)
b»»
a1**.?
10. Se*
.Ok
.»*
E-56
-------
TABLE E-56, (EST 153 EH1SSIQHS RESULTS
i - IS1 FTP VCH1CLC CM198IONS RESULTS - DISABLED Etfr
PMOJECT 11-1771-001
net* i i we nu*iuitT *s cci
»*« fSULTS
» fl N M«.fc
U SC" PMO*
B Q-E DIV * "». H20UN. M2U)
H Pint lH\.U P **. M2U11*. H2U)
• l/iMC I«Ltf IE"*. OFG. ttOEfi. F)
HLOME hEVl»LUTIU*S
CV3 f UN STO. CU. "CTfttSUCF)
HC HCKCHD METtH»/MA*C€/P("*
CO SAHPLl MiTLM/UA*bE/pPH
III ttCMifD MtUM/»ANtE,PP«
SAMPLE "E TFM/HANGE/PP-*
CU Cu"CC THAT lot' P*»«
co» C"wce n»»Tini4 PCI
Ht 'US* »*MS
CD ^133 HANS
C»TALTSt »V6. T HP.
C»T»LTh' MAK. T »p.
-t*3UPtO 01ST**4 i
i»€r.. c
IJfr,. C
COMPOSITE dESULTS
U«r NtiMBE** ISS-il
HUMIOPY C/K6 uih
Te**^tM*ruM[ yec c et.a
VEHICLE NO. IS
BAG CART NO. i
OVNO NO. 3
CVS HO. 2
DAY BULB TEMP, 22
A83. HUMIDITY 11.
1
?b2.0 OU.U)
7b2.0 (3n.O)
«3.3. (lln.O)
*Qb37
7b.* ( 2b^7. 1 )
12. ^/ 3/ U*
2««.7/ J/ *?2
,S/ 3/ 11
!.*/ )/ .Ob
l.l/ 3/ »
I.2S
1 17
S>3
1.S1
i*2.b
S.Li
17.41
* IPS. t
?7.*5
.84
H.23
!*>*.*
».?b
1H.27
SOS
>.»r
313
sut
$.7b
.401 {
1.000 (
ULFUO IG/KM ]2.
TGEN «»C1 3.
. TE"P. Of6 C »
. TEHP. DEC C S
AC 1 U^L KlIAl) LOAD
GASUC1NC EM-944
4.2 <»( It.J r»P
1
.8 DIG C<73.0 OtG F)
k Gh/KG
2
STABILIZED
7b*.0 On.O)
'b2.0 (30.0)
*).* (111.0)
k«7Dl
21, S/ 2/ 21
bB.b/13/ S3
S.b/19/ S
).S/ 3/ .OS
l.l/ 9/ S
19.28
^
«b
.45
BO.I
.*>}
7.0«
2211.1
20.81
.11
1.1*
3bB.>
3.3b
IS. 81
• bl
3.82
«ib
440
b. 14
,84»)
.01)
207.2
11.4.1
41 CARBON
ss FUEL co
2S CAfltOH
UX1DE3
*Uk HUMIuITT CUf>M
1
MOT TMANSIENT
7b».U (30. D)
7h2.U (30. a)
»•».* tiU.o)
4.bl
»1
SS
1.33
It*. &
1.38
*.•!
18S4.U
2*4. OS
.24
.8S
3^1. b
S.Ob
U.40
^Ob
3.11
J47
S2S
S.74
.417 I
l.OUft t
DIOXIDE G/KM
NJUHPTION L/lQdKh
MONUllOt G/KM
UF MfTNUtttN W/KH
CT1UN >AC1U* I.
*
SI AblLUEU
7b2.U (30.0)
7b2.0 (30. a)
49.3 1110. U)
b*b£3
1 3U. 8 (4b2U. )
I?.'/ i/ i
10. */ 2/ 1
2.B/13/
».»/ 3/ .U
L.h/ I/ S
14.22
H
3J
.87
• 2.b
.S7
i.4b
(041.U
21. *b
.U*
.no
3i8.b
3.44
L4.S2
rib?
1.41
441)
44L
t».U
.4Q4J
.47S)
217.1
11.43
}"BAC (
JSS.7 (
lb.*4 (
, Jl (
2.S) (
1.12 (
•1* - 119 »l VEHICLE
VEHICLE HUDU '" ruf)0 HUSI«N6 II
IHttMf «.<4 Ltint CIO) VI
IEST
tKST
t»»(N N
OAT(
CANT -
Tt>NPt.lUTURE UC<>. C (Df&.
MClAim HUHlOIT*. PCI
8«Mt)METFMr MM Hf,(It, HGJ
•UN HIE, «ecu«os
CV9 FLUW 3TU. CU. «E'«t3(3CM
CO
CO
CO*
»C
C'l
co
CO*
CONCtM TlOh PP"
CJNCtu 'I'"* PPH
CftNCf* THIN PCI
CDNftN HUN PPM
*A$S (i «
H«$s r. s
"A 33 G 9
XAlS ^ ft
OFC, (ObT)
JCF, C IDMVJ
VUL rsc )
HM (IE 9UP.tl»
EAT MUMMttt.
Q1AL FUEL 3ULFHH.
PAOJECT U-*77l-U01
VCHtCLt NU. 15
UlNStMSIOK 19
SV« ll» K6C tlH* L»>
Itl-ii
SET
29.3 / ".0
fO. 7
70.X (10.0)
Jba.o cin.o)
*3.) (UU.O)
tl'331
2L1.1 (?*&«.?)
il.1/ tf gg
^.^/ a/ 10
3i.7/ia/ (
H/13/
•l.^/ I/ i.k
1.7/ 3/ .0
J.bl
bb
7bJ.O (10.0)
JbZ.O (»0.0>
•9.9 CllO.O)
blS»0
I s. (tnM.o)
? .7 i/ 21
.7 i/ 10
I .< I9/ II
.i 19/ >
» .9 I/ l.Ot
.7 */ .Ob
j .h • / ibb
.b »/ b
li
7*1.2
-.1
Ml
?Sb.*
10. ^b
E-57
-------
llftt NO. 1*1-91 HO*
vrxlUC "UOtL 71 FOW<> MI
CNC,|I4F *.4 Llltl* LIU) V-«
7*2.»» «« Ht;(rf4.21 1"* "I.)
TABLE £-57, TEST 153 EMISSIONS RESULTS
Pv« * Ml FTP VtMICLE EMlS»IONt NESULT3 - DIS4SLEO F.C»
PROJECT 11-»771-001
ACTUAL RUAU LOAD
CASUL1NE fI-)**
DATE 1/17/7
MAG CANT NQ.
DTNO WU.
C/S NU.
ORV HUL« FFNP. 23.3 DEC C(7t.O OCG F)
Aits. MU^IDITY 12.1 CM/KG «ox HUMII>KT
1.2 KN( 12.j n(«)
COLD THANSlfct.T
HOT THAN3IL"T
Cvi» FLU* 510. U'. «fc
MC HCKGHG «tlEq/HA«
ca 0CK«Ri' HEIEN/BAN
woi SAMPLF. "ET€*
DILUTION FACTO*
**C CONCC*»TB* T 10
civ cowctNinAi 10* ^cr
"UK CONCCkTRAT tU'l PPM
NC >««S9 GM»M»
NO* GRAH3/KM
FU(L CnN3U"»flON dT Cfi L/inil
• UN I l
CATALV
QfC, NCT (I)*-!)
acF, -et (o«-»^
VUL (9CM)
KM (Mt*3UWtDJ
6. C
»1. 1 1 1 1
1.2/ 3Y
.2/ 3/
*.0/ 3/
I.*/ S/
I.SS
.0)
12
5
.Ob
*3.3 (110
11. 1/ 2/
I.S/U/
*.2/ 3/
13. $4
.L')
12
1
.Ob
'
»<.ll (119. U) «.« (10^.11)
2.k/ij/ i i.mii
«.»/ I/ .07 I.I/ I/ .(1
l.l/ I/ 1 l.u/ J/ J
1.B> !«.{<
20M.S
1 .03
IS.'3
SOS
37
.42
2201.3
21.fl
357.1
3. S3
15.)3
l.OOU ( .47*)
(07.7
11.43
H00.2
ID.bl
3A2.1
IJ.34
SOS
3.S3
J«7
S21
s. n
2M
.47
ftv.R
.S3
.U4
. to
3*3.S
207, 7
ll.lt
Tf«-P'B*TI)Kt OtC C 13.)
**f,. HH. OlfGEt
CATALYST AVC. TENP.
31.0-t
3.7»
VEMJCLt MuOtL 74 FQfO -uSUnU 11
ENGINE *.H 1(302 ciD) V-R
TMT CTCLf.
wet Al l^f Hli«101t»» "CT
P.I00MI.IF.M, MM NCtJfj Hf, )
HUN I IMF , S(Cu*«oa
»LP«EW niF P MM. h/'jciw. H2U)
CU2 Mi33 GMIKS
NCI* MASS GRAMS
D'C, -ti (OHV)
scr, -CT (GIT?
V(IL (SCi)
TtMPtrtAtUkt, OtG C
Avr. . E»H. o*vct n< PL i
CARttUN DIO«Il>£f G/M"
CA"(jON HUM) I J lit , ' G/M"
OltOCS HF NITftOijfN, G/KH
pnoJter ti**7?i-ooi
VEHICLE "J- IS
TRANSMISSION A)
CVH |»S7 NG( *Q*S LBS)
1S3-J2
SET
1
SI. 2
7*1.1 (24, L4)
»olb (los.n)
112220
it 1.7 (7*71.^)
21.it/ It 2*
•«.*/ 2/ 1Q
d?!*/ )/ I.fc2
3.«/ I/ .OS
l.l/ */ 3
IS
l.S*
b.<«2
47.M7
.171 ( .Bb4)
i. uno ( .47*)
211.7
IS 3-12
7*1 .»
4.1
«**
h HI
.'18
y
TEST »tn
ACTUAL n<
GASOLINE
153-33
HFET
1
•/I7/78
*«.7
>41.» (24.14)
7*4.3 (24. S)
7*4.3 U4.5)
*).3 (11(1-0)
22. 3/ 2/ ft
1U.P/ 2/ 11
.7/13/ 1
I.S/ 2/ .US
!»/ •»/ *
13
1.43
323. b
.17
3.fS
*U7'I.{
b«.U
.852 ( .•**>
l.tino ( .471)
us.*
lb.21
151-33
7*1 .»
4.2
2*. I'
•lib
2S1.1
.US
.2*
*.2H
1S«« KI,< 3SOV t«3)
«UAl> LQ*0 4.2 *»( 12.3 nP
E-58
-------
TABLE E-58. TEST 1SH EMISSIONS RESULTS
111 FTP VEHICLE EHIIIlONt lEIULTt - UNN001PIEO
PROJECT U-11*1*001
TUT 10. 111-11 RUN 1
•EM1CLI MODEL 71 FORD MUSTANG II
ENGINE 1.1 <.l
SV» |l!7 «G( 1U1S LBS)
IAROHETER 7-0. 4? HN HGU4.17 IN Mi)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY hi PCT
•
ILOMER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
8LOMER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLU« STB. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETCR/RAHCE/PP*
HC >C>»D HETEH/RANGt/PPN
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO tCKORO NETER/RANGE/PPH
co? siitnt MEIEH/RANGI/PCT
CO? 9CKCHO METER/RANGE/PCT
»0« SAMPLE HETFR/RANGe/PPH
NOX BCKQ80 ME TCP/RANCE/PPM
DIiuiiKN FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRANS
CO? MASS C9AMS
NOX MASS GRANS
MC CRAMS/**
CO GRANS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOW CHANS/KM
ruil. CONSUMPTION BY C» L/100HM
HUH TIME SECONDS
AVG. E'H. OXYGEN PEDCCMT
CATALTST Ave. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALTST MH. TEMP. Of0. C
M(ASU«EO OI3TAHCE «n
OfC. -ET (0«»)
SCf, »ET (0»'T)
VUL (3CM)
KM (MCA3UHCD)
COMPOSITE "(SUITS
TEST NUMBER 151-U
aAPOME'ER MM N6 7<*0.^
MU*tollY G/NC 10.^
TEMPEPATURt DEC C tl.l
VEHICLE NO. IS
DATE ^/ S/7t
IAC CURT NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. I
01V SULS TEMP. 11.1 DiC C(».0 Ott F)
TEST »E1«MT lilt «
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4
CASU.INI IH-IM
OOOMETE" 0 KN(
MOO t»)
KH< It.] HP)
NOI MUMIOITT COIKECTION FACTOR 1.01
COLD TRANSIENT
7bt.O (10. 0)
771.7 (10.5)
•9.1 (110.0)
1047V
7b.7 (2707.1)
11. 1' I/ 1H
1.7/ 3/ I?
11. I/ !/ 771
l.O/ I/ il
• I.I/ I/ l.»
I.I/ 3/ .07
If. I/ I/ II
l.S/ Z/ 1
I. it
117
71R
1.11
I'.l
t.bl
tl.ll
1011. I
11 .20
an. 5
1.11
U.10
!OS
1.11
STABILIZED
7ki.o (10.0)
7k?.0 (10.0)
49.1 (110.0)
k4!k!
110.1 (IkOO.S.)
I/ If
11.
IS
tilt 114
/It/ 17
I/ i.OO
/ I/ ,0k
/ it 14
/ It 1
11.11
11.1
.71
11.17
1111.7
f.tt
.11
1.11
ill.!
.11
11.71
Ski
1.17
l.'l k.lk
lioOO ( '.47])
10k.4
11.11
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIIED
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR KG/KM 91.kl
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT 1.10
CATALYST AVC. TEMP. DEC C
CATALYST »*«. TEKP. OCO C J«7
7kl.O (10.0)
7kl.O (90.0)
41.1 (110.0)
40kt!
7k. 1 (Ikl7.0)
91. 1/ if 11
14. «/ if 14
t4,7/ll/ kl
ll.l/ll/ 11
l.k/ I/ .07
11. I/ I/ 11
l.l/ I/ 1
11.11
14
10
1.1!
10.7
.11
4.14
llkl.1
1.10
.14
.77
171.1
. 74
11.70
SOS
4.17
4k!
(47
1.71
.4i« t
1.000 (
>IDE G/KN
MPT10N L/100KH
MS (THC) G/KM
OXIDE G/KN
NITROGEN G/«.N
7k?. 0 (10.0
7kl.O (90.0
H.l (110. )
k47!t
110. k (4kll )
l».4/ It
it.it If
kl.0/11/
ll.l/ll/
«.»/ ]/ .0
14. it if n
l.l/ it i
11.14
10
11
.41
11. k
.77
I.It
It07.0
1.44
.11
.4!
114.4
.47
11.41
Ik)
k.ll
441
1(0
k.14
,40k>
.ITS)
10k. 7
11.17
1-OAG
114.7 (
14.74 (
.11 (
1.71 (
.44 (
4-BAG)
997.7)
11. kl)
.11)
9.11)
.41)
VEHICLE MQQEL 71 FOftO MUSTANG U
ENBINE 1.4 LUO? CID) v.|
TEST NUMI\J«
'E»T CYCLE
RUN NUMtEff
OATC
ODOMETER
CVS - ttAC CART - OXHIHOHCTE*
TEMPERATURE OEG. C (0(0. F)
HfLATlVC HUHIOITY, PCT
SAROHE1CM, MM HC(tN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
SLnHER nlF P MM. H?0(IN. Htn)
*LO»C« INLET p KM. "/oil". »ro>
HLOMER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG« F
•LOMER REVOLUTIONS
CVS 'L0» STO. CU. HETRES(SCF)
MC SAMPLE MCTER/RANGE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METEH/RANCE/PPM
CO 8C«5RO ttTlR/RA»lit/PPM
coi BCKRRO METER/RANGE/PCT
CO
CO?
MOX
MC
CONCCNTRATION PPN
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS GRAMS
MAIS GRAMS
CO? Mtag GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
OFC. "ET (DRY)
SCF. >ET (DRY)
VUL (tCn)
UN (M(ASUIEO)
TEST NUMtEBf PVMT
IAROKETIR, MH xt
MUMIOITY, G/KG
TE'PERATUREf OEG C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR. Mlt/KM
OEG C
r>CG C
FUEL CONSUMPTION. L/1001
HYORUCARMONS. G>NM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/NH
OxTOes OF NITROGEN. a/KN
9IT VEHICLE BMIHIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-4771-001
TEST HCIGHT lilt «G( 9«00 LID
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 4.1 «•( 11.1 HP)
VEHICLE NO. II
TRANSMISSION Al
0V* 1117 ««( 4041 Lit)
114-11
SIT
I
I/ 1/71
I!!1«H( IlD
1-1-1
11.9 / 71.0
17.1
710.1 (?4.17)
1147
771.7 (10. I)
771.) (10. t)
19.1 (110.0)
11141!
GASOLINE CK-144
110.1 (7111.
11.7/ I/ >
Ik.I/ I/ 1
11.0/19/ k
t.4/11/
17,I/ I/ l.k
I.I/ I/ .0
II.I/ I/ I
I.!/ I/
II
Ik
l.fl
II.1
1.11
11.kl
kOkl.4
10.0k
.171 ( .170)
1.001 ( .47k)
110.1
11.4k
111-11
710.4
l.k
11.I
11.44
4.01
fkl
kSl
?lf .1
11.11
.10
.kl
.11
7kl.o (10.0)
7kl.D (10.0)
41.9 (110.0)
k!014
111.I (4070.7)
II.If It ?t
11.I/ It 11
ll.k/11/ 19
4.k/ll/ I
4k.I/ It 1.07
1.7S it .Ok
7k.J/ ?/ 7k
1.4/ it 1
IS
17
1.01
74.7
.44
4.41
41kO.S
11.41
.III ( .111)
1.000 ( .171)
11!.1
Ik.41
114-11
710.7
R.k
11.1
11.10
1.17
klO
kkl
!»4.k
11.11
.Ok
.10
.41
E-59
-------
TABLE £-59. TEST 154 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT u-»m-oei
TCST NO. ll'-ll RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL '• 'ORD HU8TAN« II
ENCINE *.< L(lltt CIO) *-B
TRANSMISSION A)
6VH 18«7 KC( «M L.8S)
BAROMETER 7*0.»fc "M Mcca^.it IN HS>
RELATIVE HUHIDITT bi PCT
B*« RESULTS
••6 NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOMCR DIP P MM. MlOdN, MIO)
BLOMER INLET P MN. H/ {/ 1
7.10
101
1171
1.10
37.1
1.17
101 .10
1103.0
S.S1
1.S3
IB. 01
3kt.k
Iklil
SOI
2.11
311
kli
l.BO
7k2. (30.0)
7kl. (30.0)
»1. (110.0)
130. (IkOI.l)
11 1 11 11
kl 7 III 11$
S 7 U/ 10
3 I/ 3/ .Ok
V tl 1
11.31
11
110
.13
IB. 3
1.3k
11.71
1117.1
1.11
.11
3.22
3kl.l
11. kk
Bkk
1.77
117
111
k.11
7kl.o (30.0)
7ki.O (30.0)
13.3 (110.0)
10kl3
11. 7/ I/ 11
kl.k/11/ Ikk
l.k/11/ 1
1.3/ 3/ .07
,7/ I/ 1
1.17
(1
117
1.31
3 .k
.23
2 .1
11 k.
.3
.3
3.B
320.
nlo
SOI
3.1k
IIS
kOl
1.7k
7kl.o (30.
7ki.O (30.
13.1 (110
kllSB
10. S/ 11
73.B/13/
S.l/11/
I.I/ 3/
,7/ I/
13.11
11
. 11
13.1
.13
7.11
1102.1
1.11
.11
lll2
3k0.7
llilO
Bkl
3.B1
111
iiR
k.ll
B)
0)
.0)
10
Sk
1
.Uk
1
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR NC/KM 31.11
AVG. EIH. OXYGEN PCT 3.SO
CATALYST AVG. TCHP, DEC C 172
CATALVST HAI. TENp. DEC C k!2
CARBON OIOIIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
XVDROCARSOMB (THC)
CARBON NONOIIDE
OIIDCS OF NITROGEN
20k.1
11.Ik
310.3
IS.Ik
.kl
k.17
.11
(1-BAG)
3S0.1)
11.11)
.S2)
i.BD
VEHICLE "OOCL 71 FQKO NU«TlnC II
EN6INC t.1 L(30I CIO) v-|
TEST mxtlO
TC9T CICLC
•UN NUHflER
o»c
OOOHCTEII
Ctft » BA6 C««T • OTNAHONETEA
ifNftmiun oee. c lots, n
•ELMIVC HUMIOITTf PCT
»<«OHH£B, MX Hg(I» HO)
• UN MHCf SECONDS
BLOHE* OIF P MM. HiOdN. HJO)
ILO«ER INLET p HB. H STO. CU. MCTRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE NETER/RANGC/PPN
HC BCKCRD Heit«'»«Nee/pp«
CO S1HPLE HETED/RINCC/PPH
CO ICKCRO HETER/R1NCE/PPH
COt BCKGRD METER/RANCe/PCT
NOI SiKPLC HETCR/R1NCE/PPH
NOI BCNCRo NETER/HANGE/PPN
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MA>» CRAMS
CO MAS9 GRAMS
COI MASS GRAMS
NOI MASS GRAMS
OFC. »ET (ORV)
1CF, MET (ORT)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED!
TEST NUNiE",
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
CARBON DIOXIDE'
PUEL CONSUMPTION,
PVMT
HM HC
G/KS
oec c
MG/KM
OEG C
DEC C
C/KM
L/100KM
MrDROCARBOMS, G'KM
CARBON HONOIIOE, G/KM
OIIDES OF NITROGEN, G/«N
PROJECT 11-1771-001
VEHICLE NO. K
TRANSMISSION A3
1H7 «G( 10RI LIB)
111-tl
SET
1-1-3
13.3 / 71.0
11.1
711.1 (11.11)
1311
7kl.O (10.0)
7ki.O (10.0)
11.3 (110.0)
llllil
{ID.I (7111.7)
17.I/ »/ 17
11.S/
-------
TABLE E-60. TEST M EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVH > 111 prp VEHICLE EMISSION! RESULTS - HIGH OIL CONSUHPTION
PROJECT 11-1771-001
CST NO. 191-31 RUN 1
CHICLE NUOEL '• FORD MUSTANG II
NOINE •.• L(30I CIO) v-l
RANINI15ION 11
1*97 >C( 10*S «.>«)
•ARONCTER 712.11 HH HQ(t*.ll |N HG)
RfLATKE »U"10ltY 91 PCT
•>0 RESULTS
•A« ig»««
OESC1IPT10N
BIO»EH OIP P "». Hioiin. HIO)
•LOIIER INLET P HM. MjodN. HIO)
RLONER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. '1
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLUM 9TO. CU. M(TRES(3CF)
HC 54HPLC NETER/RANGE/PPM
HC SCHORD ME1ER/RANCE/PPN
co BC«G»O NI.TER/RAHCE/PPH
CO? SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
COf BeKCRD NCTER/RANbt/PCT
NOI SAMPLE NETER/RANCE/PPN
NO* SCKGRD NEIER/RANGE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPK
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
COI CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPH
HC MAS! CRAMfl
CO MASS GRAMS
COt "ASS S«A«9
NOI MASS GRAH9
HC GRAMS/AN
CO CRAMS/KM
cot GRANS/KM
NOI GRAH6/KN
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KH
•UN TIME 9CCON08
•VC. CIH. OIvCEN PCRCtMT
Clt>LT>T lit. It"F. DEC. C
C1MLT3T N»I. TfNP. ott. C
HEOUR(0 OI1T»NC( KM
OFC, HIT (0«»)
9CF. »ET (OIV)
YOU 13CH)
«H (HEtlUDCO)
COH'OSITE RC9ULTS
TEST NUNBCR 1IV-11
«««0«ltt» NH DC 7CI»TURE i>cc c u.i
VEHICLE NO.
0«TE "H/
B*6 CART NO.
DTNO NO.
CO »0.
li
0*1 KH.I TEH*. >1. I OCC CI71.0 Of6 F)
••I. HUHiOITV 10. » CH/«g
TC3T NEICHT llll K«( It
ACTUAL ROAO LOAO VI «•<
CAIOLINE EN-i«
000»tTe» 110k «»( tot
NOX HUNI01TV CORRCCT10H FACTOR 1.00
COLO TRANSIENT
>kl.O (30.0)
>kl.o (90.0)
19.' (111.0)
7k.9 (tklk.o)
17.It if 11]
I.I/ II 11
,M I/ 11
II.O/ it 1.S3
I.I/ 3/ .07
.•/ if 1
I.II
Kk
Ilk
k.ll
71.71
1.01
Ik.3k
10$
1.11
9TABILIZCO
1.91
It
19. kl
5.IS
.It
1.11
Ikl.l
Ikk
9.15
,«OI (
l.OOB (
.•Ik)
11.10
HOT TRANSIENT
kl.
kl.
13.
30.
5.)
.1
.1
.9
,1
.1
(30.0) 7k!
(30.0) 7k!
(110.0) 13
(lkll.1) 7k
It 1
ll/ ID
ll/
I/ ,N
If .0
I/ 1
11.
1.
3.
1 1'.
.0 (10.0)
.0 (10.0)
.3 (110.0)
107kl
I/ I/ 12
7/11/ 4
!/ 3/ 1.3k
I/ I/ ,0k
O/ I/ 1'
1.10
9k.1
11^71
1129.1
5.11
911.1
llilk
10k
1.11
917
1.71
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR HC/KN 31.11
AVC. EXH. OXYGEN PCT 3.kk
CATALYST AVG. TEHP. DEC C 171
CATALYSY MAX. TEMP. OEG C til
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KN
HYDROCARBONS (THC) C/KH
CARBON NONOXIDE C/KH
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KH
SIAB1LI1EO
7kl.O (30.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
• 1.1 (110. II)
kkkOB
130.k (Ikll.
10.I/ II 1
II. it it 1
90.I/I1/ 1
lk.0/ It
.7/ i/
11. k?
17
14.1
.71
l.kl
1111.k
1.01
11.99
tit
k.ll
107.1
11.Ik
1-IAG
lfl.1
It.17
lll.k)
It.ID
.11)
VEHICLE BOOEL 'I FORO NUSTANC II
E««l»t l.« L(10I CIO) «-«
TE9I PIUHBER
TE11 CTCLE
OATC
OOONETCR
IENPERATURE Ott. C (DEO. F)
RELATIVE MUHIOITV, PCT
IARONEIEH, HM McdN HG)
• UK I IMF, SECONDS
RLONER OIF P MN. HlOdN. HtO)
•LONER INLET P MM. H«O(IN. HIOJ
ILONER INLET TEMP. OCG. c
•LOME" REVOLUTIONS
CV9 FLON STO. CU. HETHtS(SCF)
MC SAMPLE HElER/RANGE/PPH
MC BCNGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE HITHR/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRO METEP/RANGE/PPM
cot SAMPLE METCR/RANGE/PCT
cot BCKGRO MEICR/RANUC/PCT
NOI SAMPLE METER/RANGC/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPN
MC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCCNTRAlIO* PPH
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
NOI CONCENTRATION PPH
MC MASS GRANS
CO MASS GPAHS
COt MASS GRAMS
MOX MASS GRANS
OFC, »«T (ORY)
9CF, HIT (DRY)
VOL 11CM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER, PVHI
BAROMETER, MM HG
XUKIOtTV, C/IG
TEHPERATURE, OEG c
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALTlT AVG. TEMP., OCC C
CATALYST MAX. TEHP., DEC c
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/«N
FUEL CONSUMPTION, LMOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, G/«H
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KH
OXIOI9 OF NITROGEN, G/KH
SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONO RCSUVTS
PROJECT 11-1771-001
VEHICLE NO. It
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN 111? «»( 101« LSI)
191-31
SET
1
II91KM( I1IRMILIS)
1-1-1
21.3 / 71.0
il.l
HIGH OIL CONSUNPTIOH
7kl.D (30.0)
7kl.O (10.0)
11.1 (111.0)
milt
it
ILO.I
»«.5/ if
17. k/ t/
Ni.k/12/
1.0/lt/
SN.k/ I/ l.k
>.'/ if .0
II. 7/ If i
I.O/ If
91
210
l.kl
91.0
1.01
51. H
kt2l.l
21. JO
.171 < .tkl)
1.000 ( .N7t)
210. t
tl.RO
191-92
712.1
10. k
19.1
Ik.it
t.ll
«kl
ktt
J15.7
12.11
2.17
1.00
TEST "EIGHT lt|B KC( 1100 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAO 1.2 «•( U.i HP)
GASOLINE EN-911
k/tl/71
•I71KH( SS1INILES)
2-1-1
I'.l / Bl.O
19).0
711.1 (1R.21)
7k7
2.0 (10.0)
1.0 (10.0)
1.1 (111.0)
kill!
17
.07
.I/ 2/
.2/ If Ik
.7/11/ 111
.t/12/ 9
.If
-------
APPENDIX F
AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
TABLE F-l
TABLE F-2
TABLE F-3
TABLE F-4
TABLE F-5
Car
11
12
13
14
15
Description
1977 AMC Pacer
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Chev. Malibu (Calif.)
1978 Ford Granada
1978 Ford Mustang II
Notes: 1. A double dash (—) means no valid data
were available.
2. Measured values were 0.00 mg/km for all
spaces left blank for Other Elements
-------
TABLE F-l. AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., i/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
AVG
11X-11
743.6
10.2
24.3
30.7
6.00
318.9
14.46
0.73
11.14
1.21
31.33
0.68
0.74
13.38
316.
0.20
0.03
3.05
2.35
0.00
0.04
0.00
3.
FTP
MIN
741.9
9.4
22.2
27.95
5.42
304.9
13.60
0.59
7.56
1.11
24.59
0.15
0.16
7.5
259.
0.10
0.00
1.02
1.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.92
MAX
746.3
12.4
26.1
31.94
6.55
326.1
14.91
0.83
14.03
1.38
36.33
1.33
1.43
19.1
369.
0.39
0.06
4.56
3.31
0.00
0.08
0.00
3.
AVG
11X-12
741.4
9.5
25.0
24.66
5.30
265.5
11.63
0.37
3.65
1.24
14.81
0.32
0.43
14.0
137.8
0.07
0.02
1.13*
0.79
0.00
0.00
3.
SET
MIN
737.9
9.2
23.3
23.99
4.88
261.0
11.41
0.28
1.91
1.15
10.96
0.24
0.32
8.1
126.5
0.01
0.00
1.13
0.16
0.00
0.00
2.
MAX
742.7
9.8
26.7
25.33
5.70
269.6
11.82
0.46
5.28
1.30
20.65
0.39
0.54
27.6
146.
0.12
0.03
1.13
1.23
0.00
0.00
4.
AVG
11X-13
741.4
10.0
25.3
22.26
4.81
241.5
10.49
0.31
2.11
1.40
12.88
0.24
0.36
16.6
161.1
0.07
0.01
1.28*
1.60
0.00
0.00
4.
HFET
MIN
737.9
9.0
23.9
21.30
4.66
228.9
9.94
0.25
1.68
1.36
8.03
0.14
0.22
11.0
185.
0.00
0.00
1.28
0.15
0.00
0.00
3.88
MAX
742.7
10.7
28.3
23.38
4.90
251.1
10.91
0.34
2.73
1.52
14.60
0.31
0.45
22.6
141.2
0.19
0.03
1.28
2.89
0.00
0.00
4.
-------
TABLE F-l (Cont'd)
AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
i
OJ
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
AVG
11X-11
9.71
2.35
0.77
0.00
0.35
0.19
13.4
1.9
48.
83.
7.
35.
5.
38.
40.
60.
316.
44.
0.11
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
MIN
5.96
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.07
7.5
1.0
31.
71.
6.20
29.
0.
31.
32.
45.
259.
31.
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
13.73
3.95
2.14
0.00
0.65
0.31
19.1
2.9
76.
107.
9.
45.
13.
47.
46.
85.
369.
51.
0.18
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
11X-12
10.66
2.53
0.33
0.00
0.33
0.14
14.0
3.6
13.
46.
3.
15.
1.
20.
18.
22.
138.
39.
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
MIN
6.53
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.04
8.1
2.3
9.53
44.
2.48
13.8
0.00
19.
16.58
22.
126.5
31.7
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
20.50
5.43
1.08
0.00
0.53
0.19
27.6
6.0
15.
48.
4.
16.
3.
21.
18.
27.
146.
45.2
0.04
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
11X-13
10.86
3.80
0.96
0.00
0.68
0.25
16.6
5.3
21.
51.
3.
16.
3.
22.
20.
27.
161.
53.
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
MIN
7.05
2.11
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.10
11.0
4.4
8.74
48.
2.33
14.52
0.00
22.
17.58
23.88
141.2
49.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
12.66
6.07
2.21
0.00
1.45
0.47
22.6
7.1
39.
52.
3.
17.
8.
23.
21.
29.
184.
56.5
0.06
0.18
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE F-l (Cont'd). AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
PVM-ST
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
FTP SET HFET
AVG MIN MAX AVG MIN MAX AVG MIN MAX
11X-11 11X-12 11X-13
0
0.07 0.00 0.27 0.18 0.00 0.70
0
0
0
0.12 0.00 0.46
0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02 0
0.00 0.00 0.01 0
0
0
0.05 0.02 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.13 0.06 0.03 0.11
0.00 0.00 0.01
0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02
0.01 0.00 0.02
0.15 0.03 0.35 0.04 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.05
0.01 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02
*Validity of the average value given is questionable due to insufficient data points or extreme variation
of the data points.
-------
TABLE F-2. AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
19"? 8 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
AVG
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
FTP
MIN
MAX
12X-11
742.
12.
4
2
23.8
29.
11
% 2.07
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., 5./100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons , (THC)
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen,
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS
, g/km
g/km
g/km
%
384.
477.
312.
13.
0.
5.
0.
5.
0.
1.
0
73
31
54
75
85
95*
10*
741.2
11.4
21.7
28.05
1.83
378.
469.
299.1
13.09
0.26
4.24
0.69
3.61
0.19
0.22
743.7
14.2
27.2
30.00
2.50
392.
491.
317.8
14.0
0.39
7.38
0.84
9.59
1.91
2.27
AVG
12X-12
743.0
9.8
24.1
22.60
1.84
492.
586.
247.9
10.7
0.05
1.02
0.92
1.37
0.11
0.16
SET
MIN
741.9
8.8
22.8
21.86
1.71
486.
576.
237.8
10.20
0.04
0.65
0.87
0.84
0.06
0.09
MAX
743.2
11.3
26.7
23.37
2.05
499.
606.
253.2
10.90
0.06
1.37
0.96
2.32
0.17
0.26
AVG
12X-13
742.6
9.6
24.6
20.14
1.36
547.
600.
221.5
9.49
0.03
0.49
1.02
1.12
0.11
0.18
HFET
MIN
741.9
8.8
23.3
19.03
1.14
515.
584.
215.9
9.26
0.02
0.18
0.95
0.53
0.06
0.11
MAX
743.2
10.6
26.7
20.94
1.50
559.
617.
227.3
9.77
0.04
0.96
1.12
1.75
0.21
0.35
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
1.
146.
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
41.
7
9*
47
00
06
60
08
00
00
0.7
146.9
0.11
0.00
1.98
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
40.24
2.6
146.9
0.85
0.01
4.65
0.84
0.15
0.00
0.00
42.
1.6
42.1*
0.19
0.00
2.21*
0.15
— —
0.01
0.00
29.
1.0
42.1
0.00
0.00
2.21
0.09
— —
0.00
0.00
21.
3.4
42.1
0.61
0.00
2.21
0.24
"* —
0.03
0.00
36.71
0.9
29.9*
0.04
0.00
4.95*
0.16
— —
0.01
0.00
16.51*
0.7
29.9
0.01
0.00
4.95
0.05
.—
0.00
0.00
16.51
1.0
29.9
0.14
0.00
4.95
0.34
""
0.03
0.00
16.51
-------
TABLE F-2 (Cont'd).
AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethy1amine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
AVG
12X-11
1.10
0.31
0.05
0.00
0.06
0.11
1.7
0.5
43.43*
26.16*
10.35*
7.38*
0.55*
12.16*
16.60*
30.39*
146.9*
49.0*
0.21
0.22
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
MIN
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.7
0.2
43.43
26.16
10.35
7.38
0.55
12.16
16.60
30.39
146.9
49.0
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
1.60
0.79
0.18
0.00
0.25
0.18
2.6
1.0
43.43
26.16
10.35
7.38
0.55
12.16
16.60
30.39
146.9
49.0
0.52
0.60
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
12X-12
0.94
0.15
0.40
0.00
0.06
0.10
1.6
3.3
21.09*
3.70*
4.64*
0.00
0.06*
1.14*
5.76*
5.74*
42.1*
84.3*
0.14
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
MIN
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.0
0.1
21.09
3.70
4.64
0.00
0.06
1.14
5.76
5.74
42.1
84.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
1.01
0.61
1.59
0.00
0.22
0.17
3.4
9.3
21.09
3.70
4.64
0.00
0.06
1.14
5.76
5.74
42.1
84.3
0.51
0.08
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
12X-13
0.93
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.20
0.9
3.8
17.74*
2.93*
4.61*
0.00
0.04*
1.24*
3.36*
0.00
29.9*
74.8*
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
MIN
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.7
3.0
17.74
2.93
4.61
0.00
0.04
1.24
3.36
0.00
29.9
74.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
1.85
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.55
1.0
5.0
17.74
2.93
4.61
0.00
0.04
1.24
3.36
0.00
29.9
74.8
0.00
0.01
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE F-2 ^Cont'd). AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
FTP SET HFET
AVG MIN MAX AVG MIN MAX AVG MIN MAX
PVM-ST 12X-11 12X-12 12X-13
Cr 0
pb 0.00 0.00 0.01
Mn 0
As 0
Hg 0
Br 0
P 0.00 0.00 0.01
Si 0.01 0.00 0.01 0
Cd 0
Al 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
S 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.05
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl 0.01 0.00 0.02
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe 0.07 0.00 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.22
V
Ti
Ba 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Ca 0.01 0.00 0.02
*Validity of the average values given is questionable due to insufficient data points or extreme variation
of the data points.
-------
TABLE F-3. AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - CALIFORNIA
:ONFIGURATION
i
CD
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/kin
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
AVG
13X-11
742.8
10.8
23.5
36.94
5.26
487.
593.
404.1
17.42
0.19
2.16
0.43
3.42
0.73
0.66
1.5*
104.
0.24
0.01
5.35
0.10
0.11*
0.00
0.00
5.
FTP
MIN
742.8
8.9
21.7
35.94
5.03
482.
584.
393.8
17.02
0.17
1.66
0.37
2.29
0.41
0.36
0.3
85.2
0.10
0.00
2.51
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.00
4.
EVI:
MAX
744.7
13.9
25.6
37.77
5.50
495.
601.
409.7
17.62
0.20
2.88
0.50
5.24
1.03
0.96
2.3
136.
0.49
0.03
9.34
0.21
0.11
0.00
0.00
5.12
ESION RATE, MG/KM (Except as
AVG
13X-12
742.8
9.2
24.0
28.78
4.68
598.
690.
316.7
13.58
0.05
0.75
0.35
4.66
2.75
3.20
1.0
27.
0.09
0.00
1.74
0.03
—
0.00
0.00
3.
SET
MIN
739.1
8.3
22.2
28.26
4.45
572.
661.
308.2
13.19
0.04
0.37
0.33
3.13
1.72
1.91
0.2
20.
0.00
0.00
1.72
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
2.99
MAX
745.5
10.4
25.6
29.99
4.94
613.
708.
327.2
14.00
0.06
1.76
0.36
6.67
3.82
4.51
1.8
39.1
0.29
0.00
1.76
0.11
—
0.00
0.00
3.
Noted)
AVG
13X-13
742.8
9.1
25.4
24.50
4.28
612.
672.
270.1
11.55
0.04
0.21
0.42
4 . 09
2.59
1.88
1.1
29.6
0.08
0.00
2.09
0.10
— —
0.00
0.00
2.
HFET
MIN
739.1
7.4
24.4
23.60
4.21
597.
648.
257.6
11.01
0.03
0.18
0.37
2.35
1.35
1.86
0.3
21.
0.00
0.00
0.89
0.06
~ ~~
0.00
0.00
2.
MAX
745.5
10.0
26.7
25.84
4.37
623.
704.
281.9
12.06
0.05
0.27
0.50
6.90
3.47
4.77
2.1
34.8
0.18
0.00
3.29
0.14
_ —
0.00
0.00
3.
-------
TKBLE *-i ICont'd) .
KVERXGE, W1UIMUH AND M&XIHUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1918 CHEVROLET WKLIBU - CALIFOBNIA
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
T!
I
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylainine
AVG
13X-11
1.20
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.06
1.5
0.8
60.
14.
10.
1.
1.
4.
5.
9.
104.
54.
0.12
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
n 00
FTP
MIN
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.2
46.15
10.
8.86
0.
0.70
3.
4.
7.66
85.2
47.4
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
1.67
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.23
2.3
0.8
80.
20.
12.
1.04
1.
6.
6.
12.
136.
68.
0.41
0.09
0.18
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
13X-12
0.41
0.33
0.13
0.00
0.06
0.05
1.0
2.0
22.
2.
3.
0.
0.13
0.
0.
0.
27.
53.
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
MIN
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.2
0.5
16.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
20.
40.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
0.57
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.24
0.21
1.8
3.0
32.45
2.58
3.72
0.
0.38
0.
0.
0.
39.1
65.2
0.06
0.07
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.ou
AVG
13X-13
0.59
0.27
0.07
0.00
0.08
0.06
1.1
2.6
22.
3.
3.
0.00
1.
0.00
0.
1.
30.
68.
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
MIN
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.9
17.
0.37
2.
0.00
0.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
21.
52.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
0.89
0.54
0.29
0.00
0.30
0.18
2.1
4.2
25.20
4.60
4.36
0.00
1.
0.00
1.
3.
34.8
82.5
0.02
0.05
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.oo
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE F-3 (Cont'd). AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - CALIFORNIA
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
PVM-ST
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
FTP SET HFET
AVG MIN MAX AVG MIN MAX AVG MIN MAX
13X-11 13X-12 13X-13
0
0.15 0.00 0.60
0
0
0
0.13 0.00 0.50 0
0
0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
0
0.02 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0
0.21 0.14 0.30 1.13 0.72 1.55 1.16 0.62 1.64
B
0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
0.04 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.02
0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.01 0.00 0.05
*Validity of the average values given is questionable due to insufficient data points or extreme variation
of the data points.
-------
TABLE F-4. AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp. , °C
Catalyst Max. Temp. , °c
Carbon Dioxide , g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen , g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sul fides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sul fide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
AVG
14X-11
741.4
10.5
23.3
32.6
5.24
382.
462.
353.5
15.22
0.27
1.48
1.22
7.55
1.15
1.18
3.4
97.
0.11
0.03
1.93
0.23
0.03
0.00
0.00
21.
FTP
MIN
MAX
AVG
SET
MIN
MAX
14X-12
738.1
9.3
22.8
31.96
4.87
371.
444.
346.3
14.91
0.25
1.20
0.96
5.05
0.34
0.35
2.0
72.
0.07
0.00
1.26
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.
743.5
12.2
23.9
34.11
5.70
392.
482.
369.0
15.92
0.30
1.88
1.41
9.20
2.90
3.02
4.8
117.
0.15
0.09
2.87
0.36
0.10
0.00
0.00
27.
740.
9.
24.
25.
4.
463.
549.
277 .
11.
0.
0.
0.
4.
3.
5.
2.
49.
0.
0.
0.
0.
-
0.
0.
9.
5
5
2
42
52
1
86
09
36
94
69
78
01
2
9
07
00
77*
02
-
01
00
738.1
8.9
22.8
24.69
4.35
448.
533.
269.3
11.52
0.07
0.25
0.88
0.66
0.92
1.17
1.6
42.0
0.00
0.00
0.77
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
7.
743.7
10.7
25.0
26.19
4.78
483.
572.
285.3
12.22
0.11
0.47
1.04
10.10
5.67
7.65
3.1
57.7
0.13
0.00
0.77
0.04
— —
0.05
0.00
15.
AVG
HFET
MIN
MAX
14X-13
740.
9.
24.
22.
3.
495.
552.
245.
10.
0.
0.
0.
10.
8.
12.
1.
44.
0.
0.
0.
0.
~
0.
0.
4.
5
2
7
53
29
7
51
07
25
85
81
46
75
8
07
00
76*
06
—
01
00
738.1
8.1
22.8
21.34
3.20
479.
538.
233.0
9.96
0.05
0.05
0.77
3.93
2.01
2.75
1.1
29.
0.00
0.00
0.76
0.00
~~ ~~
0.00
0.00
4.
743.7
10.2
26.1
24.36
3.38
520.
572.
265.0
11.37
0.11
0.62
0.95
23.21
14.12
20.84
3.3
59.1
0.10
0.00
0.76
0.11
__
0.02
0.00
4.82
-------
TABLE F-4 (Cont'd)
AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as
N)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
AVG
14X-11
2.89
0.14
0.05
0.00
0.17
0.15
3.4
1.4
37.
12.
14.
0.
1.
5.
8.
21.
97.
37.
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
MIN
0.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.0
0.7
20.
4.
7.
0.
0.63
2.
5.
18.
72.
29.
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
4.16
0.51
0.15
0.00
0.27
0.31
4.8
1.9
48.
17.
17.
1.47
1.
7.23
11.
22.
117.
47.
0.10
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
14X-12
1.33
0.27
0.43
0.00
0.08
0.12
2.2
2.7
21.55
5.70
9.77
0.00
0.35
2.57
2.96
6.97
50.
51.1
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
MIN
1.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.06
1.6
1.5
18.12
5.31
9.36
0.00
0.20
1.92
0.00
5.94
42.0
38.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
1.50
0.64
1.58
0.00
0.15
0.25
3.1
4.4
24.98
6.08
10.18
0.00
0.49
3.21
5.91
7.99
57.7
64.1
0.04
0.07
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
14X-13
0.85
0.12
0.63
0.00
0.13
0.10
1.8
2.9
20.
3.
9.
0.
0.
2.
4.
5.
44.
47.
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
MIN
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
1.1
1.0
17.
2.
7.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
29.
41.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
1.33
0.25
2.53
0.00
0.16
0.15
3.3
5.5
23.54
4.66
11.97
0.
0.79
3.50
7.36
7.32
59.1
53.8
0.04
0.09
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE F-4 (.Cont'd) . AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
7 Sodium
£ Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
PVM-ST
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
AVG
14X-11
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.16
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.42
0.03
0.00
FTP
MIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
SET
MAX AVG MIN MAX
14X-12
0.41
0.01
0.15
0.05 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.02
0.28 1.33 0.36 1.89
0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01
0.03
0.03
1.38 0.05 0.00 0.11
0.06 0.02 0.01 0.02
0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
HFET
AVG MIN MAX
14X-13
3.39 0.87 5.38
0.04 0.00 0.05
0.02 0.02 0.03
0.01 0.00 0.02
*Validity of the average values given is questionable due to insufficient data points or extreme variation
of the data points.
-------
TABLE F-5. AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, i PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature ,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., i/lQO km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen ,
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS
g/km
g/km
%
AVG
15X-11
741.0
10.1
22.4
29.79
4.21
450.
580.
343.5
14.93
0.32
3.34
1.02
5.76
0.59
0.67
FTP
MIN
MAX
AVG
SET
MIN
MAX
15X-12
740.7
8.8
21.1
25.37
3.42
431.
542.
339.7
14.79
0.29
2.56
0.94
3.32
0.51
0.53
741.4
10.9
24.4
32.30
5.40
470.
601.
348.2
15.07
0.37
3.74
1.10
8.28
0.65
0.85
741.
8.
24.
24.
3.
548.
646.
285.
12.
0.
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
0
8
2
92
22
6
25
10
72
95
19
50
69
740.7
8.6
22.8
20.40
2.81
517.
618.
280.0
12.00
0.09
0.58
0.93
1.62
0.37
0.48
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfidea
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
2.7
135.
0.27
0.01
3.06
0.48
0.01
0.11
—
27.*
1.1
122.4
0.02
0.00
2.60
0.29
0.00
0.04
—
27.
3.8
148.
0.53
0.02
3.52
0.66
0.02
0.24
—
27.
0.
51.
0.
0.
3.
0.
—
0.
0.
20.
8
20
02
14*
04
—
09
00
0.6
37.
0.00
0.00
3.14
0.03
•" —
0.00
0.00
19.59
741.4
8.9
26.1
27.44
4.03
569.
661.
298.0
12.81
0.12
1.04
1.00
4.89
0.62
0.96
0.9
60.3
0.54
0.03
3.14
0.04
~ ™
0.17
0.00
21.
AVG
15X-13
740.9
9.4
24.3
22.72
1.67
609.
663.
260.4
11.15
0.07
0.36
0.93
2.33
0.66
0.92
1.3
35.
0.15
0.06
2.38*
0.06
"~
0.37
0.00
16.
HFET
MIN
740.7
8.6
22.8
17.88
1.21
583.
644.
245.7
10.52
0.06
0.30
0.85
1.39
0.09
0.12
0.6
27.
0.00
0.00
2.38
0.02
0.00
0.00
10.
MAX
741.4
11.1
27.2
25.02
2.17
623.
696.
272.7
11.68
0.10
0.42
1.01
2.81
1.44
2.02
2-\
. 3
51.4
0. 39
0.21
2. 38
0.09
0.92
0.00
22.03
-------
TABLE F-5 ^Cont'd)
AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
AVG
15X-11
1.58
0.63
0.15
0.03
0.13
0.18
2.7
0.8
45.
24.
8.
0.32
2.
12.
14.
29.
135.
41.
0.16
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
MIN
0.41
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.10
1.1
0.4
36.61
19.49
5.
0.
1.42
11.28
13.64
27.35
122.4
40.
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
2.49
1.13
0.39
0.10
0.25
0.25
3.8
1.1
53.
28.
11.96
0.64
3.
13.
15.
31.
148.
42.2
0.42
0.19
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
15X-12
0.48
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.04
0.05
0.8
0.6
25.
3.
7.
0.
1.
1.
4.
9.
51.
56.
0.08
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
MIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.6
0.0
23.
2.
5.
0.
2.
0.
2.
2.
37.
50.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
0.77
0.39
0.27
0.00
0.09
0.11
0.9
1.0
26.67
4.55
10.79
0.
1.
2.79
6.59
17.
60.3
62.
0.20
0.26
0.08
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
AVG
15X-13
0.35
0.41
0.13
0.00
0.12
0.29
1.3
2.0
21.
1.
6.
0.00
1.
0.
2.
4.
35.
42.
0.07
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
MIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.6
1.0
16.
0.
3.
0.00
0.
0.
1.
1.
27.
31.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
0.68
1.27
0.25
0.00
0.35
0.53
2.3
3.8
27.67
2.44
10.67
0.00
2.01
1.37
2.21
6.
51.4
51.4
0.19
0.02
0.28
0.04
0.12
0.09
0.01
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE F-5 (Cont'd). AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE W/0 AIR PUMP
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
FTP
AVG
15X-11
MIN
MAX
AVG
15X-12
SET
HFET
MIN
MAX
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0.00 0.00 0.01
0.01 0.00 0.03
0.00 0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
0.05 0.01 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.22
0.01 0.00 0.01
0.03 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.04
0.27 0.00 0.73 0.04 0.00 0.11
0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02
AVG
15X-13
MIN
MAX
0.33
0.02
0.01
0.06
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.01
*Validity of the average values given is questionable due to insufficient data points or extreme variation
of the data points.
-------
APPENDIX G
AVERAGE VALUES FOR ALL CONFIGURATIONS
Car Description
TABLES G-l through G-3 11 1977 AMC Pacer
TABLES G-4 through G-6 12 1978 Chevrolet Malibu
TABLES G-7 through G-9 13 1978 Chev. Malibu (Calif.)
TABLES G-10 through G-12 14 1978 Ford Granada
TABLES G-13 through G-15 15 1978 Ford Mustang II
-------
TABLE
G-l. CAR 11 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/0 CATALYST
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., I/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Unmod.
11
743.6
10.2
24.3
30.70
6.0
318.9
14.46
0.73
11.14
1.21
31.3
0.68
13.4
316.
0.20
0.03
3.05
2.35
0.04
0.00
3.
9.71
2.35
0.77
0.00
0.35
0.19
Rich Best
Idle
111
735.1
9.5
23.1
32.27
3.88
332.6
15.70
0.81
20.79
1.18
26.3
0.27
15.2
396.
0.33
0.09
1.99
1.72
0.11
0.00
3.0
12.62
2.23
0.08
0.00
0.15
0.08
12%
Misfire
112
742.6
10.4
24.2
33.41
6.91
308.1
15.59
10.82
14.52
1.71
48.2
1.11
123.5
1354.
0.41
0.22
2.08
0.72
0.46
4.
75.24
31.04
10.00
0.00
5.30
1.92
Disabled
EGR
113
741.0
11.5
23.1
30.63
5.71
312.5
14.29
0.79
12.63
2.25
16.3
0.59
15.4
0.02
3.31
4.11
0.11
11.06
2.20
1.01
0.00
1.00
0.17
High Oil
Consump .
114
740.1
11.1
22.5
32.17
5.64
309.4
15.01
1.12
24.70
1.24
42.6
1.30
31.3
0.17
o.oo
—
0.31
21.73
7.23
1.27
0.00
0.64
0.44
G-2
-------
TABLE G~l (Cont'd). CAR 11 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
48.
83.
7.
35.
5.
38.
40.
60.
0.11
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.01
Rich Best
Idle
91.8
95.8
6.7
53.2
1.3
38.1
52.0
57.5
0.18
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.01
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.04
0.13
0.02
0.01
12% Disabled
Misfire EGR
58.
119.
10.
36.
5.
96.
230.
800.
0.40
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.08 0.02
0.02 0.01
0.12 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.02
—
0.08
~™
0.04
— —
0.11
0.02
0.01
High Oil
Consump.
—
—
—
___
—
—
—
0.10
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.01
0.11
0.25
0.09
0.35
0.45
0.72
0.02
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
aThis table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-3
-------
TABLE G-2. CAR 11 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
11
741.
9.
25.
24.
5.
265.
11.
0.
3.
1.
14.
0.
14.
138.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
3.
10.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4
5
0
66
30
5
63
37
65
24
8
32
0
07
02
1 *
79
00
00
66
53
33
00
33
14
Rich Best
Idle
111
734.
8.
26.
25.
4.
279.
12.
0.
6.
1.
8.
0.
12.
163.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
3.
9.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6
9
1
44
15
7
38
28
01
26
7
19
1
15
07
56
65
00
00
5
81
09
00
00
10
06
12%
Misfire
112
742.
10.
27.
27.
6.
266.
13.
8.
8.
1.
29.
1.
152.
659.
0.
0.
0.
0.
—
— -~
89.
39.
13.
0.
6.
2.
4
8
3
96
12
3
05
09
76
40
2
00
1
07
07
15
14
45
87
73
41
21
40
Disabled
EGR
113
741.
9.
25.
23.
5.
248.
10.
0.
3.
3.
9.
0.
8.
—
0.
0.
__
0.
_— .
—
_ —
5.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1
6
0
31
59
8
88
41
01
47
8
24
3
02
01
88
91
45
55
00
29
10
High Oil
Consump .
114
739.
9.
24.
25.
5.
262.
11.
0.
9.
1.
23.
0.
22.
—
0.
0.
—
0.
—
3.
17.
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
9
8
7
55
09
5
93
53
68
30
9
69
3
04
02
04
21
99
64
00
33
09
G-4
-------
TABLE G-2 (Cont'd). CAR 11 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Rich Best
Unmod . Idle
13.
46.
3.
15.
1.
20.
18.
22.
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.07
0.04
0.01
0.01
20.8
60.5
2.8
17.8
0.0
23.0
23.1
14.6
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.10
0.03
0.02
12% Disabled High Oil
Misfire EGR Consump.
21.
75.
6.
13.
3.
66.
103.
373.
0.06 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.07 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.02 0.01
0.07 0.03
0.03 0.03
0.02 0.01
0.01
—
__
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.01
0.10
0.04
0.19
0.06
0.32
0.11
0.56
0.02
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-5
-------
TABLE G-3. CAR 11 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
11
741.4
10.0
25.3
22.26
4.81
241.5
10.49
0.31
2.11
1.40
12.9
0.24
16.6
161.
0.07
0.01
1.3 *
1.60
0.00
0.00
4.
10.86
3.80
0.96
0.00
0.68
0.25
Rich Best
Idle
111
735.4
9.1
26.4
22.67
4.73
253.7
11.03
0.26
2.47
1.43
10.0
0.21
8.6
154.
0.10
0.05
1.92
2.14
0.00
0.00
4.3
6.86
1.49
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.07
12%
Misfire
112
742.4
11.3
28.1
25.91
—
246.6
12.09
7.54
8.10
1.57
25.0
0.83
228.1
1224.
0.05
0.05
0.33
0.14
4.
150.54
50.98
14.58
0.00
8.83
3.11
Disabled
EGR
113
741.1
9.5
24.5
20.83
5.09
224.1
9.72
0.35
1.61
3.83
6.8
0.21
7.3
0.02
0.02
7.06
0.00
5.34
0.78
0.59
0.00
0.35
0.21
High Oil
Consump .
114
739.9
9.4
24.7
21.51
4.55
229.5
10.04
0.32
2.98
1.38
19.6
0.51
16.4
0.04
0.03
—
0.00
2.
11.79
3.90
0.49
0.00
0.16
0.09
G-6
-------
TABLE G-3 (Cont'd). CAR 11 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1977 AMC PACER - 49 STATE W/O CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane ,
Acetylene /
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
21.
51.
3.
16.
3.
22.
20.
27.
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.01
Rich Best
Idle
12.0
58.0
2.1
18.1
0.0
22.9
22.1
18.8
0.06
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.01
12%
Misfire
34.
203.
16.
24.
4.
179.
172.
593.
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.02
0.03
0.02
Disabled High Oil
EGR Consump.
—
— —
—
— — __
— — —
—
— —
0.00 0.02
0.01 0.02
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.02 0.01
0.00 0.02
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.21
0.21
0.03 0.05
0.13
0.01
0.25
0.03 0.03
0.04
0.01 0.36
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-7
-------
TABLE G-4. CAR 12 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
CrotonaIdehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
12
742.4
12.2
23.8
29.11
2.07
384.
477.
312.0
13.73
0.31
5.54
0.75
5.85
0.95*
1.7
146. *
0.47
0.00
3.06
0.60
0.00
0.00
41.
1.10
0.31
0.05
0.00
0.06
0.11
Rich Best
Idle
121
736.0
9.7
24.2
30.12
1.30
370.
483.
299.1
14.66
1.08
26.02
0.57
9.42
0.41
2.0
526.
1.16
0.12
17.92
2.79
0.12
0.00
57.3
1.31
0.41
0.00
0.03
0.20
0.04
12%
Misfire
122
739.3
10.1
21.7
31.05
2.31
488.
632.
323.1
14.49
1.78
6.84
0.91
4.20
0.28
5.0
0.06
0.01
6.87
2.65
0.00
26.
2.29
2.12
0.30
0.00
0.18
0.10
Disabled
EGR
123
740.4
10.8
21.4
28.33
2.33
380.
481.
298.7
13.22
0.34
6.33
1.11
6.55
0.27
3.7
0.11
0.00
2.55
1.88
0.00
54.
2.22
0.88
0.27
0.00
0.19
0.11
High Oil
Consump .
124
738.1
11.4
22.5
29.87
1.35
385.
476.
307.8
13.94
0.57
10.81
0.57
9.45
2.84
0.8
0.27
0.01
—
0.00
32.
0.17
0.20
0.09
0.03
0.15
0.10
G-8
-------
TABLE G-4 (Cont'd). CAR 12 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese Mn
Phosphorus P
Silicon Si
Aluminum Al
Sulfur S
Sodium Na
Magnesium Mg
Potassium K
Chlorine el
Zinc Zn
Copper Cu
Nickel Ni
Iron Fe
Barium Ba
Calcium ca
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
For other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
Unmod.
43.4 *
26.1 *
10.3 *
7.3 *
0.5 *
12.1 *
16.6 *
30.3 *
0.21
0.22
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.01
Rich Best
Idle
123.4
131.0
24.1
12.4
2.0
48.4
86.0
98.7
1.06
0.01
0.14
0.02
0.00
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.51
0.01
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.10
0.02
Disabled
EGR
—
—
—
^_
__
__
—
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.65
0.01
0.02
High Oil
Consump .
—
__
_ _
—
0.17
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.24
0.01
0.04
0.19
0.17
0.14
0.06
0.52
0.01
G-9
-------
TABLE G-5 . CAR 12 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
12
743.0
9.8
24.1
22.60
1.84
492.
586.
247.9
10.70
0.05
1.02
0.92
1.37
0.11
1.6
42. *
0.19
0.00
2.21*
0.15
0.01
0.00
29.
0.94
0.15
0.40
0.00
0.06
0.10
Rich Best
Idle
121
736.1
10.2
24.7
23.74
0.93
495.
608.
256.1
11.56
0.34
8.58
0.87
2.60
0.14
0.1
229.
0.66
0.09
21.79
1.73
2.36
0.00
44.5
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
12%
Misfire
122
739.4
8.7
23.4
24.17
1.88
633.
756.
256.6
11.28
0.28
4.33
1.07
0.68
0.14
0.9
0.05
0.02
1.94
0.00
12.
0.25
0.30
0.22
0.00
0.05
0.05
Disabled
EGR
123
741.3
9.0
23.4
21.89
1.75
502.
604.
236.0
10.21
0.07
1.99
1.42
1.66
0.07
1.5
0.04
0.00
0.78
0.02
70.
1.06
0.23
0.09
0.00
0.09
0.04
High Oil
Consump .
124
738.5
10.0
23.6
22.97
1.09
503.
592.
242.1
10.72
0.21
5.36
0.73
3.86
0.19
0.3
0.59
0.00
—
0.20
16.
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.03
G-10
-------
TABLE G-5 (Cont'd). CAR 12 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
21.0 *
3.7 *
4.6 *
0.0
0.0 *
1.1 *
5.7 *
5.7 *
0.14
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.13
0.01
0.01
Rich Best
Idle
55.0
45.1
11.5
0.0
0.7
19.5
51.2
45.8
___
0.08
0.44
0.14
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.21
0.01
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
H
— —
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.01
Disabled High Oil
EGR Consump.
— __
— — —
—
_
— __
—
0.01 0.44
0.02 0.05
0.01 0.10
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.02
0.23
0.01
0.01
0.01 0.03
0.18
0.16
0.13
0.04 0.04
0.01 0.49
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-ll
-------
TABLE G-6. CAR 12 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., fc/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
12
742.6
9.6
24.6
20.14
1.36
547.
600.
221.5
9.49
0.03
0.49
1.02
1.12
0.11
0.9
30. *
0.04
0.00
4.9 *
0.16
0.01
0.00
16.5 *
0.93
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.20
Rich Best
Idle
121
736.1
10.2
24.7
20.13
1.98
517.
617.
226.1
9.80
0.10
1.98
1.10
2.74
0.05
6.5
65.
0.14
13.26
0.84
1.00
0.00
27.1
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.04
12%
Misfire
122
739.4
9.1
25.6
22.01
0.95
722.
775.
237.3
10.27
0.09
1.97
1.30
0.70
0.12
0.5
0.05
0.02
1.54
0.00
10.0
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.09
Disabled
EGR
123
741.3
8.5
24.5
19.80
1.11
565.
621.
214.6
9.24
0.05
1.13
1.56
0.75
0.08
1.2
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.06
0.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.14
High Oil
Consump.
124
738.3
9.5
24.7
21.22
0.67
565.
617.
227.7
9.90
0.10
2.54
0.85
4.57
0.14
0.-3
0..33
0.00
—
0.20
16.
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.18
G-12
-------
TABLE G-6 (Cont'd). CAR 12 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU - 49 STATE
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
17.7 *
2.9 *
4.6 *
0.0
0.0 *
1.2
3.4 *
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Rich Best
Idle
26.0
8.3
6.2
0.0
0.3
3.3
14.6
6.6
__
—
—
— —
0.01
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Disabled
EGR
—
--
—
_ ..
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
High Oil
Consump .
__
—
—
__
__
—
0.23
0.05
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.14
0.02
0.10
0.10
0.07
0.28
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-13
-------
TABLE G-7. CAR 13 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°c
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., fc/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
13
742.8
10.8
23.5
36.94
5.26
487.
593.
404.1
17.42
0.19
2.16
0.43
3.42
0.73
1.5*
104.
0.24
0.01
5.35
0.10
0.00
0.00
5.
1.20
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.06
Rich Best
Idle
131
741.3
10.3
25.0
39.40
3.28
602.
720.
440.2
19.04
0.18
3.44
0.35
2.04
4.3
0.06
3.11
0.27
0.00
0.00
2.
1.12
1.33
0.27
0.00
0.64
0.87
12%
Misfire
132
744.4
10.7
22.3
38.18
5.18
585.
711.
410.1
17.81
1.12
2.33
0.71
5.55
1.77
6.9
0.38
0.01
2.47
0.13
0.00
6.
4.47
1.74
0.46
0.00
0.04
0.10
Disabled
EGR
133
741.5
9.9
22.8
32.56
5.40
353.1
15.20
0.15
1.58
1.40
3.10
0.45
5.3
61.
0.06
1.98
0.20
0.00
10.
4.92
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.05
0.17
No Air In j .
+R.B.I.
135
742.8
10.1
22.3
38.26
0.89
420.
525.
331.2
17.85
1.24
52.93
0.28
15.31
0.73
11.5
0.23
0.05
12.50
1.57
0.12
7.
1.55
3.46
2.14
0.00
4.05
0.35
G-14
-------
TABLE G-7. (Cont'd). CAR 13 AVKRAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese Mn
Phosphorus P
Silicon Si
Aluminum Al
Sulfur S
Sodium Na
Magnesium Mg
Potassium K
Chlorine ci
Zinc Zn
Copper Cu
Nickel Ni
Iron Fe
Barium Ba
Calcium Ca
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
Rich Best
Unmod . Idle
60.
14.
10.
1.
1.
4.
5.
9.
0.12
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00 0.01
0.01 0.05
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.02 0.02
0.21 0.67
0.04 0.18
0.01
0.01
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.22
0.15
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.04
0.86
0.07
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.44
0.02
0.02
Disabled
EGR
26.
8.
5.
1.
0.
3.
5.
13.
« —
—
—
—
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.17
0.01
0.01
0.01
No Air Inj .
+ R.B.I.
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.22
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
G-15
-------
TABLE G-8. CAR 13 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxyg en,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
13
742.8
9.2
24.0
28.78
4.68
598.
690.
316.7
13.58
0.05
0.75
0.35
4.66
2.75
1.0
27.
0.09
0.00
1.74
0.03
0.00
0.00
3.
0.41
0.33
0.13
0.00
0.06
0.05
Rich Best
Idle
131
740.3
9.3
25.0
31.71
3.00
703.
757.
355.9
15.33
0.03
1.95
0.33
'5.15
2.51
2.8
23.
0.04
1.93
0.07
0.80
0.00
1.7
0.30
0.41
1.31
0.00
0.39
0.35
12%
Misfire
132
744.2
8.7
22.5
29.32
4.68
698.
818.
319.3
13.69
0.16
0.51
0.51
3.89
2.78
1.4
0.14
0.01
0.09
0.00
3.
1.03
0.16
0.14
0.00
0.03
0.04
Disabled
EGR
133
741.3
8.5
25.3
24.96
5.20
509.
608.
272.7
11.65
0.03
0.06
1.38
29.58
16.95
2.8
15.
0.03
0.00
0.09
0.00
4.
2.18
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.09
0.47
No Air In j .
+ R.B.I.
135
743.0
8.6
23.3
28.24
0.61
535.
671.
270.1
13.28
0.48
23.64
0.25
6.89
0.08
5.8
2.06
0.00
0.69
4.26
3.
0.52
2.25
0.97
0.00
1.78
0.24
G-16
-------
TABLE
G~8 (Cont'd). CAR 13 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
22.
2.
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
02
02
05
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
13
Rich
Best
Idle
17.
1.
1.
0.
—
—
1.
2.
-•
—
~"
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
2
2
0
0
6
.01
.04
.00
.00
.00
.01
.06
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
01
10
04
00
01
00
00
00
00
01
13
Disabled
EGR
7.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
5.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
01
02
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
55
No Air
+ R.B,
—
—
—
__
—
—
— —
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Inj
.1.
03
03
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
01
03
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-17
-------
TABLE G-9. CAR 13 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., Jl/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
IsobutyraIdehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
13
742.8
9.1
25.4
24.50
4.28
612.
672.
270.1
11.55
0.04
0.21
0.42
4.09
2.59
1.1
30.0
0.08
0.00
2.09
0.10
0.00
0.00
2.
0.59
0.27
0.07
0.00
0.08
0.06
Rich Best
Idle
131
740.4
9.2
25.3
26.94
3.73
635.
711.
304.5
13.02
0.04
0.32
0.49
1.56
2.4
33.
0.05
1.10
0.19
0.00
0.00
1.9
0.66
0.24
0.14
0.00
0.68
0.64
12%
Misfire
132
744.2
8.1
24.4
25.04
4.31
731.
798.
273.1
11.69
0.09
0.24
0.56
1.83
2.18
4.1
0.12
0.00
0.07
0.00
3.
2.84
0.91
0.21
0.00
0.07
0.10
Disabled
EGR
133
742.2
9.1
26.1
21.09
5.02
530.
584.
230.4
9.84
0.03
0.03
1.78
17.72
13.81
6.0
14.
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
7.
4.54
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.04
1.35
No Air In j .
+ R.B.I.
135
743.0
8.3
23.4
23.79
0.35
613.
674.
244.9
11.10
0.16
9.30
0.26
4.30
0.11
2.7
1.03
0.00
0.29
1.12
3.
0.46
1.41
0.31
0.00
0.18
0.32
G-18
-------
TABLE G-9 (Cont'd). CAR 13 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CALIFORNIA WITH AIR PUMP
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Unmod.
22.
3.
3.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Rich Best
Idle
23.1
3.6
3.0
0.0
—
—
0.6
2.5
__
—
—
— —
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
12%
Misfire
—
—
--
—
—
—
—
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Disabled
EGR
6.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
5.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
No Air In j
+ R.B.I.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.00
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
1.16
0.90
0.02
0.01
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-19
-------
TABLE G-10. CAR 14 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/lan (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
14
741.4
10.5
23.3
32.6
5.24
382.
462.
353.5
15.22
0.27
1.48
1.22
7.6
1.15
3.4
97.
0.11
0.03
1.93
0.23
0.00
0.00
21.
2.89
0.14
0.05
0.00
0.17
0.15
Rich Best
Idle
141
740.1
10.7
24.2
36.81
4.70
556.
662.
369.5
17.18
0.62
19.70
0.62
3.0
0.28
2.5
300.
0.03
0.08
21.40
0.98
0.26
0.00
9.8
1.33
0.63
0.16
0.00
0.07
0.26
12%
Misfire
142
742.1
11.1
22.2
34.42
4.93
504.
625.
367.9
16.06
1.65
2.00
1.70
12.7
0.16
9.5
—
0.04
0.01
3.70
0.16
0.00
—
—
4.38
3.21
1.17
0.03
0.49
0.18
Disabled
EGR
143
742.9
9.1
22.2
33.27
4.05
346.
427.
359.5
15.52
0.36
1.94
4.13
10.2
0.26
7.1
138.
0.02
0.03
3.77
1.45
0.00
—
60.5
5.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.07
No Air Inj.
+ R.B.I.
145
737.1
10.9
22.3
35.15
5.55
355.
460.
297.6
16.40
2.26
50.62
0.61
17.9
4.58
0.9
—
0.79
0.00
—
0.69
__
14.
0.33
0.31
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.23
G-20
-------
TABLE G-10 (Cont'd). CAR 14 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUUCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
37.
12.
14.
0.
1.
5.
8.
21.
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.16
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.42
0.03
Rich Best
Idle
133.5
36.9
18.2
0.8
2.1
12.2
68.4
27.7
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.02
12%
Misfire
—
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.27
0.04
0.01
Disabled
EGR
37.
23.
11.
1.
0.
13.
15.
38.
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
— —
0.04
0.01
No Air In j
+ R.B.I.
—
—
0.67
0.05
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
—
—
—
—
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-21
-------
TABLE G-ll. CAR 14 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UMMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometerf
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
gAg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
14
740.5
9.5
24.2
25.42
4.52
463.
549.
277.1
11.86
0.09
0.36
0.94
4.69
3.78
2.2
49.9
0.07
0.00
0.8 *
0.02
0.01
0.00
9.
1.33
0.27
0.43
0.00
0.08
0.12
Rich Best
Idle
141
739.5
9.8
23.9
27.18
3.80
577.
678.
290.0
12.69
0.16
4.23
0.68
1.96
0.13
1.2
104.9
0.04
0.04
13.5
0.06
0.36
0.00
5.5
0.75
0.15
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.14
12%
Misfire
142
742.7
9.1
22.2
26.94
4.19
596.
685.
292.1
12.57
0.52
0.51
1.19
5.55
0.53
7.3
—
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.00
—
— _
3.81
2.35
0.65
0.00
0.34
0.12
Disabled
EGR
143
742.1
8.7
23.9
26.22
3.06
435.
525.
286.1
12.24
0.08
0.24
5.13
10.28
4.50
4.9
16.0
0.15
0.01
0.06
0.00
—
11.8
3.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.39
No Air In j .
+ R.B.I.
145
739.0
11.2
23.1
25.5
4.15
450.
546.
250.7
11.90
0.82
16.18
0.70
3.91
0.36
0.1
—
1.04
0.00
—
3.12
—
6.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
G-22
-------
TABLE G-ll (Cont'd). CAR 14 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Tr imethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
21.5
5.7
9.7
0.0
0.3
2.5
2.9
6.9
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
Rich Best
Idle
59.3
9.4
11.1
0.0
1.1
2.8
16.5
4.3
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
__
—
—
— — •
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
Disabled
EGR
16.
2.
6.
3.
0.
0.
2.
-r-~
0.14
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
No Air Inj
+ R.B.I.
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0.89
0.06
0.09
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.33
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.20
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.01
0.17
0.03
1.72
0.01
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-23
-------
TABLE G-12. CAR 14 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxyg en,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
14
740.5
9.2
24.7
22.53
3.29
495.
552.
245.7
10.51
0.07
0.25
0.85
10.81
8.46
1.8
44.
0.07
0.00
0.8 *
0.06
0.01
0.00
4.
0.85
0.12
0.63
0.00
0.13
0.10
Rich Best
Idle
141
736.6
10.7
24.5
23.41
3.15
550.
638.
253.0
10.92
0.15
1.56
0.84
1.46
0.20
1.5
59.
0.05
0.01
4.6
0.05
0.00
0.00
3.4
0.66
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.09
12%
Misfire
142
742.7
9.2
23.6
23.42
3.11
632.
691.
254.4
10.93
0.39
0.27
1.04
6.46
0.83
9.0
0.01
0.01
0.13
0.00
5.60
2.47
0.50
0.00
0.28
0.13
Disabled
EGR
143
742.1
8.8
25.3
22.67
1.67
478.
531.
247.5
10.58
0.07
0.12
4.88
12.87
9.00
6.0
25.
0.03
0.00
0.12
0.00
6.4
4.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.48
No Air In j .
+ R.B.I.
145
739.0
9.1
23.9
22.08
2.23
509.
552.
236.1
10.30
0.23
2.88
0.83
1.66
0.25
0.1
0.65
o.oo
—
1.42
4.
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.04
G-24
-------
TABLE G-12 (Cont'd). CAR 14 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 FORD GRANADA - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
3.39
0.04
0.02
0.01
Unmod.
20.
3.
9.
0.
0.
2.
4.
5.
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Rich Best
Idle
30.2
4.9
11.0
0.1
1.1
1.8
4.3
5.8
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
12%
Misfire
—
—
—
_ _
—
—
— —
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
Disabled
EGR
15.
2.
5.
0.
2.
0.
1.
1.
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
No Air Inj
+ R.B.I.
—
—
—
__ _
—
—
—
0.53
0.06
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.29
0.01
0.02
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
a
0.07
0.03
0.03
3.45
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.02
This table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-25
-------
TABLE G-13. CAR 15 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
IsobutyraIdehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
BenzaIdehyde
Unmod.
15
741.0
10.1
22.4
29.79
4.21
450.
580.
343.5
14.93
0.32
3.34
1.02
5.76
0.59
2.7
135.
0.27
0.01
3.06
0.48
0.11
27.*
1.58
0.63
0.15
0.03
0.13
0.18
Rich Best
Idle
151
739.3
10.2
24.5
36.90
3.70
435.
586.
322.4
17.22
2.24
47.03
0.75
9.38
0.26
4.5
987.
0.11
56.64
6.15
0.57
0.00
45.0
2.23
1.88
0.20
0.00
0.02
0.21
12%
Misfire
152
741.7
9.7
22.5
35.86
3.35
563.
730.
380.8
16.73
1.61
3.92
1.26
7.15
0.14
4.5
149.
0.21
0.01
9.54
0.84
0.00
2.65
1.45
0.22
0.00
0.09
0.05
Disabled
EGR
153
742.7
11.9
23.1
32.44
3.66
415.
524.
349.6
15.14
0.33
2.57
4.15
8.71
0.23
6.2
0.03
0.05
2.44
0.56
0.00
3.74
0.09
0.21
0.00
0.50
1.68
High Oil
Consump .
154
741.6
10.8
23.1
33.04
3.58
473.
600.
350.7
15.42
0.48
5.71
0.87
10.90
9.39
1.9
0.58
0.01
—
0.00
0.59
0.90
0.09
0.02
0.12
0.11
G-26
-------
TABLE G-13 (Cont'd). CAR 15 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
45.
24.
8.
0.
2.
12.
14.
29.
0.16
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.27
0.02
Rich Best
Idle
257.4
301.8
48.0
1.3
7.4
78.8
118.3
174.2
__
0.03
0.20
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.15
0.01
12% Disabled High Oil
Misfire
39.
9.
6.
0.
16.
4.
37.
38.
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.85
0.03
EGR Consump .
—
—
—
— —
— —
— —
0.01 0.50
0.02 0.05
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.00
0.04 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.35
0.02
0.01
0.02 0.08
0.22
0.03
0.18
0.28
0.09 0.22
0.02 0.60
0.07
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
\his table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-27
-------
TABLE G-14. CAR 15 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
Of
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
15
741.0
8.8
24.2
24.92
3.22
548.
646.
285.6
12.25
0.10
0.72
0.95
3.19
0.50
0.8
51.
0.20
0.02
3.1 *
0.04
0.09
0.00
20.
0.48
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.04
0.05
Rich Best
Idle
151
738.6
10.2
23.9
28.10
2.58
536.
665.
279.9
13.11
0.81
15.72
0.82
2.73
0.15
0.9
384.
0.06
29.0
1.99
2.37
0.00
22.0
0.41
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.13
12%
Misfire
152
740.3
12.6
24.2
26.97
2.86
687.
776.
290.3
12.59
0.50
1.89
1.31
2.83
0.05
2.0
0.01
0.25
0.00
1.33
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.20
Disabled
EGR
153
742.3
9.2
22.8
26.36
2.88
496.
612.
287.4
12.30
0.08
0.31
4.63
5.77
0.75
6.3
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.03
4.08
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.22
2.00
High Oil
Consump.
154
741.8
10.3
23.3
26.48
2.65
560.
663.
285.
12.36
0.19
2.45
0.92
6.69
0.26
0.8
0.26
0.00
—
0.16
0.28
0.21
0.23
0.00
0.05
0.09
G-28
-------
TABLE G-14 (Cont'd). CAR 15 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Mn
P
Si
Al
S
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
Unmod.
25.
3.
7.
0.
1.
1.
4.
9.
0.08
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.01
0.04
0.02
Rich Best
Idle
98.8
101.8
20.0
0.0
3.5
34.9
56.6
68.0
0.02
0.09
0.09
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.07
0.02
12% Disabled High Oil
Misfire EGR Consump.
—
—
0.01 0.19
0.03 0.02
0.00 0.05
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.27
0.01 0.01
0.02 0.52 0.07
0.17
0.01
0.01 0.14
0.22
0.07 0.04 0.06
0.01 0.02 0.51
0.02 0.01
*validity of the average value given is questionable.
aThis table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-29
-------
TABLE G-15. CAR 15 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No. PVM
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, 9/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Unmod.
15
740.9
9.4
24.3
22.72
1.67
609.
663.
260.4
11.15
0.07
0.36
0.93
2.33
0.66
1.3
35.
0.15
0.06
2.4 *
0.06
0.37
0.00
16.
0.35
0.41
0.13
0.00
0.12
0.29
Rich Best
Idle
151
739.1
9.7
26.4
24.95
1.48
576.
669.
266.9
11.64
0.31
3.12
0.92
2.11
0.21
1.8
155.
8.6
0.24
0.81
0.00
7.3
0.66
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.13
12%
Misfire
152
740.3
13.0
26.1
24.60
1.64
735.
787.
267.4
11.48
0.29
0.41
0.62
1.37
0.04
5.9
0.13
0.01
0.31
0.00
4.55
1.15
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.05
Disabled
EGR
153
742.3
8.7
24.7
23.26
1.29
566.
634.
253.8
10.85
0.05
0.20
4.36
4.75
1.68
3.5
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.73
High Oil
Consump .
154
741.8
10.2
26.1
23.39
1.10
619.
681.
253.8
10.92
0.09
1.02
0.75
3.32
0.23
1.1
0.09
0.01
—
0.12
0.05
0.42
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.33
G-30
-------
TABLE G-15 (Cont'd). CAR 15 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND THE
MALFUNCTION' CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1978 FORD MUSTANG II - 49 STATE
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Rich Best 12% Disabled High Oil
Unmod. Idle Misfire EGR Consump.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements a
Manganese Mn
Phosphorus P
Silicon Si
Aluminum Al
Sulfur S
21.
1.
6.
0.
1.
0.
2.
4.
0.07
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.4
27.2
11.8
0.0
3.2
10.8
25.8
27.3
0.15
0.33
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.03
0.02
0.70
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.04
Sodium
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Na
Mg
K
Cl
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
Ba
Ca
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.14
0.08
0.13
0.03
0.37
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
aThis table excludes lead, bromine and all elements having measured emissions
values consistently below 0.01 mg/km.
Note: For Other Elements, a blank space indicates a 0.00 value.
G-31
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
RfcPORT NO.
EPA-460/3-80-003
TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from
Malfunctioning Non-Catalyst and Oxidation Catalyst
Gasoline Automobiles
. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOf*NO.
REPORT DATE
January 1980
5. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
11-4771
AUTHOR(S)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
Charles M. Urban
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-2499
2. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor. Michigan AS1Q5
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report 12/76-4/79
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
5. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
6. ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboraotry effort to characterize regulated and
unregulated exhaust emissions from non-catalyst and oxidation catalyst-
equipped gasoline automobiles operating under malfunction conditions. One
non-catalyst and four catalyst-equipped automobiles were evaluated over
three driving schedules in the unmodified and in four engine and/or emission
control system malfunction configurations. Exhaust emission constituents
measured, in addition to the currently regulated emissions, include parti-
culates, sulfates, aldehydes, sulfides, amines, metals and several additional
elements and compounds.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
Air Pollution
Catalytic Converters
Exhaust Emissions
Gasoline Engines
Motor Vehicles
.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Emissions Characterizatio
Emission Test Procedures
Light-Duty Vehicles
. COSATI l-icld/Group
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
312
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
INSTRUCTIONS
1. REPORT NUMBER
Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.
2. LEAVE BLANK
3. RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
Reserved for use by each report recipient.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
number and include subtitle for the specific title.
5. REPORT DATE
Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date of
approval, date of preparation, etc.).
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
Leave blank.
7. AUTHOR(S)
Give name(s) in conventional order (John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.). List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
zation.
8; PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Include ZIP code.
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
Leave blank.
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as: Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of, Presented at conference of,
To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc.
16. ABSTRACT
Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
(a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the major
concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.
(b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.
(c) COSATI FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List. Since the ma-
jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
the primary posting(s).
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Denote releasability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
the public, with address and price.
19.&20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.
21. NUMBER OF PAGES
Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.
22. PRICE
Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73) (Reverse)
------- |