United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
EPA 460/3-83 006
May 1983
Air
Unregulated Emissions for Vehicles
Operated Under Low Speed
Conditions
-------
EPA 460/3-83-006
Unregulated Emissions for Vehicles
Operated Under Low Speed Conditions
by
Lawrence R. Smith
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
Contract No. 68-03-3073
Work Assignment 4
EPA Project Officer: Robert J. Garbe
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
May 1983
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - in limited quantities - from
the Library Services Office, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas, in
fulfillment of Work Assignment 4 of Contract 68-03-3073. The contents
of this report are produced herein as received from Southwest Research
Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those
of the author and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency. Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as
an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA 460/3-83-006
11
-------
FOREWORD
This project work assignment was initiated by the Control Technology
Assessment and Characterization Branch, Environmental Protection Agency,
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105. The engineering and
analytical effort on which this report is based was accomplished by the
Department of Emissions Research of Southwest Research Institute, 6220
Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284. The program, authorized by
Work Assignment 4 under Contract 68-03-3073, was initiated April 26, 1982
and was completed September 1982. This program was identified within
Southwest Research Institute as Project 05-6619-004. The EPA Project
Officer for the program was Mr. Robert J. Garbe of the Emission Control
Technology Division, Environmental Protection Agency. The SwRI Project
Leader and principal researcher for the project was Dr. Lawrence R. Smith.
Mr. Charles M. Urban of SwRI was involved in setting up the vehicles for
malfunction operation in the program. Mr. Charles T. Hare was Project
Manager and was involved in the initial technical and fiscal negotiations
and subsequent major program decisions.
111
-------
ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions from six automobiles with various
emission control systems at idle and low speed operation. The automobiles
were evaluated at manufacturer's specifications and under malfunction
operation. Exhaust emission constituents measured, in addition to the
currently regulated emissions, include: sulfates, aldehydes and ketones,
cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia.
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD iii
ABSTRACT iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
SUMMARY xi
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Project Objective 1
B. Emission Measurement Procedures 1
C. Automobiles Evaluated 1
D. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated 2
E. Vehicle Testing 2
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATIONS AND PROCEDURES 3
A. Automobiles 3
B. Fuels 3
C. Dynamometer and CVS Systems 3
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis 8
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions 8
F. Emission Test Procedures 12
G. Test Number System 15
H. Computational Methods 15
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS 17
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures 17
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical
Procedures 19
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedures 20
IV. CAR SELECTION AND TESTING 23
A. Car Selection 23
B. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated 23
C. Car Testing 25
D. Regulated and Unregulated Emission Test Results 25
E. Other Testing 27
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd).
V. ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS
A. Regulated Emissions and Fuel Consumption
B. Aldehyde and Ketone Emissions
C. Other Unregulated Emissions
D. Comparison of Results with Previous Projects
REFERENCES 43
APPENDICES
A. CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
B. INDIVIDUAL IDLE AND MODIFIED NYCC TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
C. INDIVIDUAL MODIFIED NYCC TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
D. COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE REGULATED EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS
E. ADDITIONAL TEST RESULTS
VI
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Four of the Cars Evaluated in this Project 5
2 Views of the Gasoline Emissions Sampling System 9
3 Views of the Diesel Emissions Sampling System 10
4 Gasoline and Diesel Engine Emissions Sampling System 11
5 NYCC Driving Cycle 13
6 Modified NYCC Driving Cycle as used in this Project 13
V13-
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Automobiles Evaluated 4
2 Description of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 Unleaded Gasoline 6
3 Description of Diesel Fuel EM-329-F 7
4 Summary of Driving Schedule Parameters 12
5 Test Sequence for Each Automobile Evaluated 14
6 Laboratory Test Sequence 15
7 Sampling and Analysis Methodology for Unregulated
Emissions 17
8 Procedural Validation and Qualification 20
9 Emission Procedural Sample Rates and Accuracy 21
10 Aldehyde Emission Procedural Accuracy 22
11 Cars Selected for Testing 24
12 Malfunction Conditions Evaluated 25
13 Project Test Matrix 26
14 Thirty Second Cold Idle Testing 28
15 Hot Modified NYCC Elevated Inertia Weight Testing 29
16 Summary of the Average Regulated Emissions and Fuel
Consumption Data 32
17 Summary of Aldehyde and Ketone Emissions 33
18 Summary of the Average Ammonia, Cyanide, Sulfate, and
Particulate Emissions 36
19 Comparison of Car 91 with Results from Previous Projects 37
20 Comparison of Car 92 with Results from Previous Projects 38
Vlll
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd).
Table Page
21 Comparison of Car 93 with Results from Previous Projects 39
22 Comparison of Car 94 with Results from Previous Projects 40
23 Comparison of Car 95 with Results from Previous Projects 41
24 Comparison of Car 96 with Results from Previous Projects 42
IX
-------
SUMMARY
The major objective of this project task was to evaluate regulated and
unregulated exhaust emissions from automobiles operating at idle and at low
speeds. These automobiles were equipped with a cross section of currently
available emission control systems and were tested at manufacturer's speci-
fications and under malfunction conditions.
The study involved six vehicles selected from five vehicle/emission
control system categories: non-catalyst (1970 Ford Fairlane), Diesel (1981
Oldsmobile Delta 88), three-way catalyst (1981 Volkswagen Rabbit and 1982
Mercury Zephyr), oxidation catalyst with air pump (1980 Buick Century),
and oxidation catalyst without an air pump (1978 Chevrolet Nova). Engine
sizes on these automobiles ranged from a 105 CID, 4 cylinder engine to a
350 CID, 8 cylinder engine.
Unregulated emissions measured included: particulates, aldehydes
including formaldehyde and acrolein, ammonia, cyanides, hydrogen sulfide,
and sulfate. A number of the analytical procedures for these compounds
were developed in previous projects.
Five of the six cars in the program were also evaluated under malfunc-
tion operation. The malfunction configurations evaluated in this program
included one or more of the following malfunctions: Rich Best Idle, air
pump failure, and oxygen sensor failure. The test sequence used for vehicle
testing included 5-minute Cold and Hot Start Idle tests and 12-minute Cold
and Hot Start Modified NYCC tests. The Modified NYCC test was developed
in this program to provide a low-speed driving cycle which simulated vehicle
operation in a typical parking garage.
A substantial data base, for the cars evaluated, was generated in this
project. These data were analyzed to the extent applicable and are pre-
sented in several different formats to facilitate their review and usage.
The most significant observations made from the data in this program
(not necessarily in order) are as follows:
• In general the Cold Idle and Cold Modified NYCC tests gave
higher regulated emissions and fuel consumption rates than
their hot start counterparts.
• High overall emissions, both regulated and unregulated,
and fuel consumption rates were noted in most cases for
vehicles operating under malfunction conditions as com-
pared to baseline operation.
• One or more aldehydes and ketones were found in 99 percent
of the samples, but individual aldehydes were found less
frequently.
xi
-------
The highest individual aldehyde emission rate, 3.97 mg/min
formaldehyde, was detected during Hot Idle - Rich Best Idle
operation of the Ford Fairlane.
The Ford Fairlane (a non-catalyst vehicle) also produced the
highest levels (baseline and malfunction) of acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
benzaldehyde, and total aldehydes and ketones for the six
cars tested.
Rich Best Idle operation, as opposed to baseline operation,
produced higher aldehyde emissions for the Ford Fairlane
(a non-catalyst vehicle) and the Volkswagen Rabbit (a three-
way catalyst vehicle). In contrast, however, Rich Best Idle
operation combined with a disconnected air pump gave lower
aldehyde emissions than the baseline for the Buick Century.
Hydrogen sulfide was not detected in any of the samples
analyzed in this program.
The Ford Fairlane (a non-catalyst vehicle) gave the highest
ammonia emissions for the program while operating at Rich
Best Idle.
The highest baseline levels of ammonia for the six cars were
found in the Volkswagen Rabbit (a three-way catalyst vehicle)
exhaust.
Cyanide emissions were higher during malfunction operation
than during baseline operation for all cars evaluated.
When comparing emissions at low-speed/idle with emissions
generated in previous projects using equivalent or similar
cars driven over the Federal Test Procedure (emissions com-
pared on mass per unit time basis), the following observations
were made:
Emission Control
Type
Low-Speed/Idle vs FTP Emission Comparison
Non-Catalyst
Higher ammonia and cyanide, Low-Speed/
Idle Emissions
Lower HC, NOX, particulate, sulfate, and
aldehyde, Low-Speed/Idle Emissions
Catalyst-Equipped
In general, higher Low-Speed/Idle
Emissions
Diesel
Similar emissions for the Low-Speed/Idle
and FTP tests
xii
-------
Based on a cursory examination of the toxicological pro-
perties of the regulated and unregulated emissions
evaluated in this program, the most significant emissions
appear to be the currently regulated pollutants, carbon
monoxide and oxides of nitrogen. Next in significance
appear to be acrolein, cyanide, and formaldehyde.
Xlll
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This report describes the effort to characterize regulated and unreg-
ulated exhaust emissions from six automobiles operating at idle and at low
speeds. These six automobiles were equipped with a cross section of cur-
rently available emission control systems and were evaluated at manufac-
turer's specifications and under malfunction operation. This is one of
several programs to be completed at SwRI involving a large number of un-
regulated emissions from automobiles. The previous projects involved
malfunctioning automobiles 0-t2/3,4)*f automobiles designed for low NOX
operation(5), high-mileage catalyst-equipped automobiles(*>), and auto-
mobiles fueled with methanol.' ''
A. Project Objective
The primary objective of this project was to evaluate regulated and
unregulated exhaust emissions from automobiles during idle and low speed
operation. Six automobiles, equipped with a cross section of emission
control systems, were evaluated at manufacturer's specifications and under
malfunction conditions.
B. Emission Measurement Procedures
The compounds or groups of compounds evaluated, along with the
sampling methods used, were as follows:
Sampling
Methods Compounds Evaluated
Bag HC, CO, NOX, CO2
Filter Particulates, Sulfate
Impinger Cyanide, aldehydes, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide
Several of these procedures for measuring the unregulated emissions were
developed in other projects, and were reported in two widely distributed
interim reports.(8'^'
C. Automobiles Evaluated
Six automobiles equipped with a cross section of emission control
systems were evaluated in this project. The automobiles evaluated in-
cluded a 1970 Ford Fairlane (no catalytic aftertreatment), a 1981 Olds-
mobile Delta 88 (Diesel), a 1982 Mercury Zephyr (three-way catalyst), a
1981 Volkswagen Rabbit (three-way catalyst with closed loop fuel system),
a 1980 Buick Century (oxidation catalyst with air pump), and a 1978
Chevrolet Nova (oxidation catalyst). These cars were either rented
*Numbers in parentheses designate references at the end of this report.
-------
locally or were obtained through the EPA Project Officer. The Ford Fairlane
and the Volkswagen Rabbit('' had been tested in previous EPA Projects.
D. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated
All six of the automobiles were evaluated in a baseline configuration
(i.e./ tuned to manufacturer's specifications). The five gasoline-powered
automobiles were also evaluated under the following malfunction conditions:
Ford Fairlane - Rich Best Idle
Mercury Zephyr - Air Pump Failure
Volkswagen Rabbit - Rich Best Idle plus Oxygen Sensor Failure
Buick Century - Rich Best Idle plus Air Pump Failure
Chevrolet Nova - Rich Best Idle
The rich best idle condition involved adjusting to the idle mixture pro-
ducing the highest engine speed at idle. Oxygen sensor failure was simu-
lated by disconnecting the electrical connection to the oxygen sensor,
and air pump failure was simulated by disconnecting the air hose at the
check valve and capping the check valve inlet. The sixth automobile, a
5.7 S, Diesel 1981 Oldsmobile Delta 88, was evaluated only in the baseline
configuration.
E. Vehicle Testing
Each of the automobiles involved in this study was tested in duplicate
or triplicate in a baseline configuration and, with the exception of one
vehicle, in duplicate or triplicate under malfunction operation. One
vehicle, the Oldsmobile Delta 88, was tested only in the baseline config-
uration. The test sequence included a Cold Idle test, a Hot Idle test,
a Cold Modified NYCC test, and a Hot Modified NYCC test. The modified
NYCC tests were developed in this program to simulate the low speed
operation expected in a typical parking garage.
-------
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATIONS AND PROCEDURES
This section describes the automobiles, the fuels, the facilities,
and the general instrumentation and procedures utilized in this project.
The overall sampling systems for the unregulated emissions are also discussed.
A. Automobiles
One diesel- and five gasoline-powered automobiles were evaluated in
this project. The automobiles are described in Table 1. Several of the
cars are shown in Figure 1. Four of the cars were rented locally, while
two of the cars, the Ford Failane and the Volkswagen Rabbit, were obtained
through the EPA Project Officer and had been tested in previous EPA projects.
B. Fuels
Three fuels were used in the course of this program; Chevron UL-CQ26B1
unleaded gasoline, Fina regular leaded gasoline, and a "national average"
No. 2 diesel fuel. The Chevron unleaded fuel used in this project was of
the type provided to auto manufacturers for emissions durability mileage
accumulation tests. This fuel had been used in previous unregulated
emission projects involving catalyst-equipped cars. The fuel was used
for the catalyst-equipped cars (Cars 93, 94, 95 and 96) in this project
so that the emissions data could be compared with the earlier work without
introducing fuel effects. This gasoline is described in Table 2, and has
a sulfur level of 0.03% as specified in Advisory Circular No. A/C 26B1.
The hydrogen-to-carbon ratio was 1.89, and the SwRI Identification Number
was EM-518-F. The fuel had lost some of the light ends during storage
(RVP had dropped from 8.9 to 6.2). To correct this, n-butane was injected
into the fuel to bring the RVP back up to near the original value (8.8).
The Fina regular leaded fuel was used for testing the non-catalyst-
equipped 1970 Ford Fairlane. This fuel was obtained in a single batch
from a local service station and was assigned the SwRI Identification
Number, EM-516-F. This fuel had a lead content of 1.02 grams per gallon
and a (R + M)/2 octane number of 89.0.
The diesel fuel used in this program was selected to represent a
"national average" No. 2 diesel fuel of 1978, and was used in the testing
of the diesel-powered Oldsmobile Delta 88. This fuel, EM-329-F, is
described in Table 3.
C. Dynamometer and CVS Systems
Gasoline System - A Clayton Model ECE-50 chassis dynamometer with a
direct-drive variable-inertia flywheel system was utilized for all gasoline-
powered vehicle transient testing. This direct-drive inertia system simu-
lates equivalent weight of vehicles from 455 kg (1000 Ib) to 4025 kg
(8875 Ib), in 55 kg (125 Ib) increments.
-------
TABLE 1. AUTOMOBILES EVALUATED
Project
Car No.
91
92
93
94
95
96
Project
Car No.
91
92
93
94
95
96
Project
Car No.
91
92
93
94
95
96
Year Make Model Body Type
1970 Ford Fairlane 2-dr
1981 Oldsmobile Delta 88 4-dr
1982 Mercury Zephyr 4-dr
1981 Volkswagen Rabbit 4-dr
1980 Buick Century 4-dr
1978 Chevrolet Nova 4-dr
Emission Controls
Engine Air Transmission
CID/Cyl Catalyst Pump EGR Type/Gears
302/8 No No No A/3
350/8 No No Yes A/3
Diesel
200/6 3-way Yes Yes A/3
105/4 3-way No No A/3
231/6 oxidation Yes Yes A/3
250/6 oxidation No Yes A/3
Chassis Dynamometer Settings
ID or
Serial Number
FOA29F272235F
1G3AY67N9BX108402
1MEBP71B4CK604123
1VWGB9171BY085460
4H69AAZ130360
1X69D8W192412
Odometer
Accessories Mileaqe
P.S.
P.S.
A.C.
P.S.
A.C.
A.C.
P.S.
A.C.
P.S.
A.C.
,A.C. 67432
,P.B., 36856
,P.B., 7217
16156
, P.B., 31188
, P.B., 58377
Inertia Power Inertia Power
Kilograms Kilowatts Pounds Horsepower
1815 8.9 4000 12
1930 8.4 4250 11
1590 8.0 3500 10
1135 5.7 2500 7
1645 8.4 3625 11
1815 7.8 4000 10
.0
.3
.7
.7
.3
.5
-------
Car 91 - 1970 Ford Fairlane
Car 93 - 1982 Mercury Zephyr
Car 94 - 1981 Volkswagen Rabbit
Car 95 - 1980 Buick Century
Figure 1. Four of the cars evaluated in this project
-------
TABLE 2. DESCRIPTION OF CHEVRON UL-CQ26B1 UNLEADED GASOLINE
Property
Gravity, °API at 60 °F
Research Octane No.
Motor Octane No.
Sensitivity
Lead, g/gal.
Sulfur, wt. %
Phosphorus, g/gal.
Manganese, g/gal.
Gum, mg/100 m&
Unwashed
Washed
Reid Vapor Pressure, psi
Distillation, °F
(% Evaporated)
IBP
10%
50%
90%
EP
Recovery, %
Residue, %
Loss, %
Acidity of Residue
Hydrocarbons, Vol %
Aroma tics
Olefins
Saturates
Benzene, Vol %
Water & Sediment, Vol %
Oxidation Stability, Hr
Copper Corrosion
Test Method
ASTM D 1298
ASTM D 2699
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 3237
X-Ray - ASTM
D 2622 (Modified)
ASTM D 3221
EAM 128-74
ASTM D 381
ASTM D 323
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 1093
ASTM D 1319
Chevron Research
Technique
ASTM D 2709
ASTM D 525
ASTM D 130
Test Result
58.4
91.6
83.2
8.4
0.001
0.029
0.0002
0.001
85
0
8.9
97
129
212
328
386
97.5
1.0
1.5
Pass
28
8
64
2.0
<0.001
24+
1A
NOTE: These inspection data were provided by the
Chevron Research Company
-------
TABLE 3. DESCRIPTION OF DIESEL FUEL EM-329-F
Cetane No. (D613) 50
Cetane Index (D976) 52
Gravity, "API @ 60°F 37.5
Density, g/m£ @ 60°F 0.837
Carbon, wt. % 85.8
Hydrogen, wt. % 13.0
Nitrogen, ppm (oxid. pyrolysis) 48
Sulfur (lamp), % 0.24
Calculated H/C, numeric 1.81
Carbon No. range (G.C.) 8-24
Aromatics, vol. % } 21.3
Olefins, vol. % > (D1319) 1.7
Paraffins, vol. % ) 77.0
Viscosity, cs (§100 °F (D445) 2.36
Gum, mg/100 m& (D481) 14.3
Total solids, mg/& 7.4
Metals in fuel, x-ray Oa
Boiling Range, °C (IBP-EP, D86) 191-340
10% point 219
20% 231
30% 242
40% 251
50% 260
60% 269
70% 278
80% 290
90% 307
95% 323
Residue, wt. % (D86) 1.3
<10 ppm of Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Mg;
<70 ppm Pb; <100 ppm Al and Si
-------
The constant volume sampler (CVS) used for these evaluations was SwRI
CVS Number 2. This unit has a nominal capacity of 9.0 m^/min (320 cfm).
A nominal 460 mm (18 inch) diameter by 5 m (16 foot) long dilution tunnel
was used between the intake filter and the CVS to enable sampling of
particulates.
Partial views of the chassis dynamometer, the dilution tunnel and the
intake to the CVS can be seen in Figure 2. Both the dynamometer and the
CVS were calibrated, maintained and operated in accordance with the manu-
facturer's instructions and the appropriate sections of the Code of Federal
Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles. ^-°)
A 142 mVmin (5000 cfm) fan was placed in front of the automobiles
during testing for cooling.
Diesel System - A second Clayton Model ECE-50 chassis dynamometer with
a direct-drive variable inertia flywheel system was used for all diesel-
powered vehicle transient testing. The CVS used for the diesel evaluations
was SwRI CVS Number 17. This unit has a nominal capacity of 14.0 m3/min
(495 cfm). A nominal 460 mm (18 inch) diameter by 5 m (16 foot) long
dilution tunnel was also used with the diesel system to enable sampling
of particulates. Partial views of the diesel chassis dynamometer, dilution
tunnel and the CVS can be seen in Figure 3. As was the case for the gaso-
line system, the dynamometer and the CVS were calibrated, maintained and
operated in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and the Federal
Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.^10^
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis
A pictorial schematic of the exhaust and sampling system (applicable
to both the gasoline and diesel systems) is shown in Figure 4. This system
is in accordance with the guidelines established in previous unregulated
emission projects conducted at SwRI for the EPA. The primary feature of
this system is the number of sampling probes and systems necessary to
collect all of the required unregulated emission samples. This complexity
is illustrated in the views of the gasoline system shown in Figure 2.
This section has described the dilution tunnel and provided some
insight into the overall sampling system assembly. More details on each
of the individual sampling systems for the unregulated emissions are given
in Section III.
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions
Bagged samples of the dilute exhaust were evaluated for HC, CO, NOX,
and CC>2 using SwRI Bag Cart Number 1. This bag cart was designed, cali-
brated and operated in accordance with the appropriate sections of the Code
of Federal Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.(10)
-------
CVS Side of System
Dynamometer Side of System
Figure 2. Views of the gasoline emissions sampling system
i
-------
CVS Side of System
Dynamometer Side of System
Figure 3. Views of the diesel emissions sampling system
!
-------
Exhaust
Out
(Bags)
HC, CO, NOX, CO2
AP Control
Orifice
CVS
' """" Constant
\ Volume
Sampler
f
(Traps and Impingers)
HCN
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Hydrogen Sulfide
(Filters)
Particulate
Sulfate
460 mm (18")I.D.
c
Orifice Mixing
Plate
Hydrocarbons
Filtered
Air In
Exhaust
from
Automobile
Figure 4. Gasoline and diesel engine emissions sampling system
-------
Hydrocarbon analysis of the gaseous sample from the diesel system was
continuous using a heated flame ionization detector (HFID). Electronic
signal integration used with the HFID provided dilute hydrocarbon concen-
trations for each run. The gaseous sample was taken directly from the
diluted exhaust stream through a heated probe in the dilution tunnel.
In addition, the levels of raw hydrocarbons were recorded continuously
on a strip chart recorder for the gasoline cars. These emissions were
monitored to provide a better insight into the variability of the HC
emissions during a test procedure. The HC emissions were obtained using
a Beckman 402 HFID detector operating on either the 1,000 or the 10,000
ppm range.
F. Emission Test Procedures
Four emission test procedures were utilized in this project; a Cold
Idle Test, a Hot Idle Test, a Cold Modified New York City Cycle (NYCC)
Test, and a Hot Modified NYCC Test. The Cold Idle Test includes a cold
start (test is preceded by a 12-20 hour soak period) followed by 5 minutes
of idle operation with the vehicle in "drive." The Hot Idle Test consists
of a hot start (test is preceded by operation of the vehicle over a 505
second "transient" phase of the Federal Test Procedure and a five minute
soak period), followed by 5 minutes of idle operation with the vehicle
in "drive."
The Modified NYCC Test, as used in this program, was developed at a
meeting with the EPA Project Officer. The test cycle was specifically
intended to provide a low-speed driving cycle which simulated vehicle
operation in a typical parking garage or other very slow speed vehicle
operating conditions. This modified NYCC test cycle consists of the
first 360 seconds of the original NYCC (omitting the last 240 seconds
entirely) with all vehicle operation between the 145th second and the
240th second, as well as operation between the 276th second and the 315th
second of the test cycle replaced by idle operation (Figure 5). Two of
these 360-second segments are then driven back-to-back to generate the
complete modified NYCC cycle (Figure 6). The resulting vital parameters
are 12 minutes in total test duration, an average speed of 4 km/hr, and
68 percent idle operation. Table 4 lists a summary of the parameters
for both the original NYCC and the modified NYCC.
TABLE 4. SUMMARY OF DRIVING SCHEDULE PARAMETERS
Duration Distance Average Speed
Schedule Seconds Kilometers km/hr mph
NYCC 599 1.91 11.5 7.1
Modified NYCC 720 0.80 4.0 2.5
12
-------
100
80
60
40
20
0
60
•
40
' J3
^^
•H
20
•
0
NYCC
200 400
TIME, sec
600
Figure 5. NYCC Driving Cycle
100
80
* 60
E
X
40
20
o
' 60
•
40
JZ
X
•H
. s
20
n
•
Modified
NYCC
AM . A K. AK .A A.
0 200 400 600
TIME, sec
Figure 6. Modified NYCC Driving Cycle As Used In This Program
13
-------
The Modified Cold NYCC test is preceded by a cold start (vehicle not
operated for at least 4 hours, with hood closed) and 30 seconds of idle
operation with the vehicle in "drive." This four hour soak period was
selected to make the most efficient use of test facilities while allowing
as long a soak period as practical for a cold test. Inasmuch as the
intention was to simulate parking garage operation, the four hour soak
appears sufficient. The Hot Modified NYCC test is preceded by a 505 second
transient phase of the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and 30 seconds of idle
operation with the vehicle in "drive."
The test sequence followed for each automobile is given in Table 5.
The sequence followed in the laboratory for running one set of emissions
tests (Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC) is
given in Table 6.
TABLE 5. TEST SEQUENCE FOR EACH AUTOMOBILE EVALUATED
Sequence Operation Performed on Each Vehicle
Upon Receipt
Drain and fill with test fuel, install and leak-check
exhaust adapter, tune vehicle to manufacturer's
specifications.
Precondition with 2 Urban Dynamometer Driving
Schedules (UDDS).
Run Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC, Hot
Modified NYCC. Sample and analyze emissions.
Run Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC, Hot
Modified NYCC. Sample and analyze emissions.3
Modify to operate in a malfunction condition.
Precondition with UDDS cycle.
Run Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC, Hot
Modified NYCC. Sample and analyze emissions.
Run Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC, Hot
Modified NYCC. Sample and analyze emissions.0
Return to unmodified condition.
3Car 95 was run over three replicate Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified
NYCC, and Hot Modified NYCC sequences.
Car 92 was not run in a malfunction configuration.
CCars 93, 94 and 95 were run over three replicate Cold Idle, Hot Idle,
Cold Modified NYCC, and Hot Modified NYCC sequences.
14
-------
TABLE 6. LABORATORY TEST SEQUENCE
1. Precondition, UDDS
2. Soak 12-20 hours
3. Cold Start Idle - 5 minutes (Sample)
4. Run 505 of FTP ) , , ,., .= .,,.
, .. > Change bubblers, filters, etc.
Soak 5 minutes )
5. Hot Start Idle - 5 minutes (Sample)
6. Run 505 of FTP \
...,, .,« , > Change bubblers, filters, etc.
Idle 30 seconds J
7. Modified NYCC - 12 minutes (Sample)
8. Run 505 of FTP ) , , ,_,,
„ , . , ( Change bubblers, filters, etc.
Soak 4 hours J
9. Cold Start Idle - 30 seconds
10. Modified NYCC - 12 minutes (Sample)
G. Test Number System
The numbering system used in this project consists of three digits plus
a test abbreviation. The designation used for all automobile testing was
"WT", followed by the individual test abbreviation, Cold Idle, Hot Idle,
Cold Modified NYCC, or Hot Modified NYCC. The meaning of each letter is
described as follows:
As Used in
Code Description This Project
W Vehicle Designation 91 thru 96
T Test Series - Baseline 1 thru 3
- Malfunction 6 thru 8
H. Computational Methods
The methods used for calculating the unregulated emissions results
are given in Appendix A. All regulated emissions were calculated using
methods prescribed in the Code of Federal Regulations for Light-Duty
Vehicles,(1Q) with the exception that the emission and fuel consumption
values are calculated per unit time instead of per unit distance. The
15
-------
sample time in minutes was used in place of distance in kilometers in the
calculations. On the computer printouts for the regulated emissions
(Appendix D), all items of potential interest are identified by descriptive
headings. Items on the computer sheet identified only by abbreviated
headings are used in calculating the unregulated emissions.
16
-------
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
The analytical procedures used to measure the unregulated emissions are
summarized in this section. Detailed descriptions for several of the pro-
cedures, along with discussion of their development, validation, and quali-
fication, are available in the EPA reports, "Analytical Procedures for
Characterizing Unregulated Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles"(8)
and "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing Unregulated Emissions from
Vehicles Using Middle-Distillate Fuels."(9)
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures
The unregulated emissions evaluated in this project, along with the
methods for sampling and the procedures used in the analysis, are listed
in Table 7. The aldehydes and ketones represent a group of compounds.
TABLE 7. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
Compound
Ammonia (NH )
Aldehydes & Ketones
Sampling Method of Analysis
Impinger Ion Chromatograph.
Impinger Dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative.
Total Cyanide [Hydrogen Impinger
Cyanide (HCN) and
Cyanogen (C^)]
Particulates Filter
Hydrogen Sulfide (H S) Impinger
Sulfate Filter
Liquid Chromatograph with ultra-
violet detector.
Cyanogen chloride derivative. Gas
Chromatograph with electron capture
detector (GC-ECD).
Weighed using microbalance.
Methylene blue derivative.
Spectrophotometer.
Barium chloranilate derivative (BCA).
Liquid Chromatograph with ultraviolet
detector.
This procedure separates and identifies a number of individual aldehydes
and ketones within the group. The analytical procedures involved in this
project are briefly described as follows:
Ammonia - Ammonia in CVS-diluted automotive exhaust is measured in the
protonated form, NH4+, after collection in dilute H2SO4. The acidification
is carried out in a glass impinger maintained at ice bath temperature. A
17
-------
sample from the impinger is then analyzed for ammonia in an Ion Chromato-
graph and the concentration in the exhaust is calculated by comparison to
an ammonium sulfate standard solution.
Aldehydes and Ketones - The collection of aldehydes (formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde, acrolein, propionaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, benzaldehyde,
isobutyraldehyde and hexanaldehyde) and ketones (acetone and methylethyl-
ketone) is accomplished by bubbling CVS-diluted exhaust through glass
impingers containing 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) in dilute hydro-
chloric acid. The aldehydes and ketones (also known as carbonyl compounds)
react with the DNPH to form their respective phenylhydrazone derivatives.
These derivatives are insoluble or only slightly soluble in the DNPH/HC1
solution and are removed by filtration followed by pentane extractions.
The filtered precipitate and the pentane extracts are combined, and then
the pentane is evaporated in a vacuum oven. The remaining dried extract
contains the phenylhydrazone derivatives. The extract is dissolved in a
quantitative volume of methanol, and a portion of this dissolved extract
is injected into a liquid chromatograph and analyzed for several individual
aldehydes and ketones using an ultraviolet detector.
Total Cyanide (Hydrogen Cyanide plus Cyanogen) - The collection of
total cyanide is accomplished by bubbling CVS-diluted exhaust through glass
impingers containing a 1.0 N potassium hydroxide absorbing solution. This
solution is maintained at ice bath temperature. An aliquot of the absorbing
reagent is then treated with KH2PO4 and Chloramine-T. A portion of the
resulting cyanogen chloride is injected into a gas chromatograph equipped
with an electron capture detector (BCD). External CN~ standards are used
to quantify the results.
Particulate - The "particulate" is collected on a 47 mm Fluoropore
filter. The amount of "particulate" collected is determined by weighing
the filter on a microbalance before and after sampling.
Hydrogen Sulfide - The collection of hydrogen sulfide is accomplished
by bubbling CVS-diluted exhaust through glass impingers containing a
buffered zinc acetate solution which traps the sulfide ion as zinc sulfide.
The absorbing solution is then treated with N-N-dimethyl-paraphenylene diamine
sulfate and ferric ammonium sulfate. Cyclization occurs, forming the highly
colored heterocyclic compound methylene blue (3,9-bisdimethylaminophena-
zothionium sulfate). The resulting solution is analyzed with a spectro-
photometer at 667 ran in a 1-cm or 4-cm pathlength cell, depending upon
the concentration.
Sulfate - Automotive exhaust is piped into a dilution tunnel, where
it is mixed with a flowing stream of filtered room air. In the tunnel,
the 803 reacts rapidly with water in the exhaust to form sulfuric acid
aerosols. The aerosols grow to a filterable size range within the tunnel
and are collected on a fluorocarbon membrane filter. Particulate sulfate
salts are also collected on the filter.
18
-------
Sulfuric acid collected on the filter is then converted to ammonium
sulfate by exposure to ammonia vapor. The soluble sulfates are leached
from a filter with a measured volume of an isopropyl alcohol - water
solution (60% IPA). A fixed volume of the sample extract is injected
into a high pressure liquid chromatograph (HPLC) and pumped through a
column of strong cation exchange resin in Ag+ form to scrub out the
halides (Cl~, Br"), and then through a column of strong cation exchange
resin in H+ form to scrub out the cations and convert the sulfate to
sulfuric acid. Passage through a reactor column of barium chloranilate
crystals precipitates out barium sulfate and releases the highly UV
absorbing chloranilate ions. The amount of chloranilate ions released
is proportional to the sulfate in the sample and is measured by a sensi-
tive liquid chromatograph UV detector at 310-313 nanometers. All the
reactions and measurements take place in a flowing steam of 60% IPA.
The scrubber and reactor columns also function as efficient filter media
for any solid reaction products formed during passage of the sample through
the column system.
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical Procedures
Several of the procedures used in this project were subjected to a
series of validation and qualification experiments in previous projects.
Validation experiments included checks for sample stability, sample col-
lection efficiency, detector linearity, interferences, and analysis re-
peatability. Qualification experiments included the injection of the com-
pound of interest into the tunnel with and without the presence of exhaust
and the subsequent recovery of that compound at the procedure sampling point,
Sample stability checks were performed using repeated analyses of the
same sample at intervals over a specified period of time, and comparing
the results to the initial analysis. Aldehydes and ketones, ammonia, and
total cyanide samples were found to be stable for several days. Hydrogen
sulfide samples were found to be stable for approximately one day.
Sample collection efficiency experiments were performed by passing a
known concentration of sample through a series of impingers or traps and
analyzing each impinger or trap individually for the compound of interest.
All of these procedures used in this project had a collection efficiency
of 98% or better. Detector linearity experiments were performed by pre-
paring several samples of various known concentrations and plotting the
resulting peak areas versus the concentrations. The procedures had linear
response over the range of interest in this project.
To determine interferences from other compounds, for each procedure,
known exhaust components were introduced into the sample to determine their
effect on the resultant measurements. To determine analysis repeatability,
several samples of known concentrations were prepared and a number of com-
plete analyses were performed at each concentration. The results of these
tests were then compared to determine analysis repeatability.
19
-------
The qualification experiments were performed to determine if the com-
pounds of interest could travel the length of the dilution tunnel in the
presence of dilute automobile exhaust without significant loss by reaction
with exhaust or the tunnel itself. The compounds were introduced at the
same point at which the exhaust enters the tunnel and were sampled at the
normal sampling point. Table 8 lists the procedures for which validation
and qualification experiments have been performed.
TABLE 8. PROCEDURAL VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION
Validation
Compound or Compound Group Conducted Qualification Conducted
Ammonia Yes Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Aldehydes and Ketones Yes Yes
Total Cyanide Yes Yes
a „ a
Particulate No No
Hydrogen Sulfide Yes
Yes
Sulfate Noa No3
Established procedure
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedures
A difficult, but very important, endeavor was the determination of
procedural accuracy for each analytical method. The primary difficulty
involved those procedures in which the exhaust compounds are trapped or
absorbed, an extraction or subsequent reaction is performed, and then a
portion of the extract is analyzed. After much consideration, in previous
unregulated emission projects, the decision was reached to initially define
the accuracy in terms of a "minimum detection value" (MDV). The MDV, as
used in this report, is defined as the value above which it can be said
with confidence that the compound has been detected in the exhaust (i.e.,
at a measured value equal to the MDV, the accuracy is equal to plus or
minus the MDV). Determination of accuracy over the entire range of each
procedure was beyond the scope of these projects.
For compounds collected by bag samples, the MDV was determined from the
instrument detection limits only, and is independent of the sampling rate
and duration. For compounds which are concentrated in impingers or traps,
the MDV is dependent on the instrument detection limit, chemical workup,
sampling rate and sampling duration. The MDV's listed in Tables 9 and 10
were derived using the listed sampling rate and a 12-minute sampling period
which is representative of the normal test duration used in this program.
20
-------
TABLE 9'. EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC)
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Mol.
Weight
11.88
28.01
46.01
96.01
Sample
Flow
Bag
Bag
Bag
14.0
14.0
yg/m
per
PPM
575
1165
ppm
1.0"
2.0C
1915 0.5
4000 <0.01
Procedural
Minimum
Detection MDV for
Values5 Mod. NYCC
yig/m3 lug/min"
575
2330
958
<50
6
10
20
10
0.05
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones — 4.0 — — — ~0.3
Other Compounds
Ammonia 17.03 4.0 710 0.01 7 0.06
Cyanide & Cyanogen 26.02 4.0 1080 0.01 11 0.10
Hydrogen Sulfide 34.08 4.0 1415 0.01 14 0.10
aBased on a 12-minute sampling period at the specified flowrate for all
impinger and filter collected samples.
Based on yg/m3 in the diluted exhaust and typical modified NYCC parameters
(720 seconds, 108 m3 CVS flow, 0.96 DSFC).
CBased on the lowest instrument ranges used in this project.
21
-------
TABLE 10. ALDEHYDE EMISSION PROCEDURAL ACCURACY
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Mol.
Weight
30.03
44.05
56.07
53.08
72.11
106.13
100.16
CRC
Synonym0
per
PPm
Procedural
Minimum
Detection
Values3
ppm pg/nv^
MDV for
Mod. NYCC
mg/minb
propenal
propanal
1250
1830
2330
2415
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
15
20
25
25
58.08
70.09
72.11
2-propanone
2-butenal
2 -me thy 1-
propanal
2415
2915
3000
0.01
0.01
0.01
25
30
30
2-butanone
hexanal
3000
4415
4165
0.01
0.01
0.01
30
45
40
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
aBased on a 12-minute sampling period at the specified flowrate for all
impinger and filter collected samples
Based on yg/m3 in the diluted exhaust and typical modified NYCC parameters
(720 seconds, 108 n\3 CVS flow, 0.96 DSFC) .
CHandbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th Edition
22
-------
IV. CAR SELECTION AND TESTING
Regulated and unregulated exhaust emissions from six cars were measured
at idle and low speed operation. The six cars were selected to provide a
cross section of current vehicle emission control systems. The cars were
tested while operating at manufacturer's specifications and under malfunc-
tion conditions. This section describes the selection and evaluation of
these cars and presents the test results.
A. Car Selection
The cars tested in this program (Table 11) were either rented locally
or obtained through the EPA Project Officer. Two of the cars, the Ford
Fairlane and the Volkswagen Rabbit, had been used in previous EPA projects.
Each car used in the program was selected, with the Project Officer's
approval, from the emission control system categories listed below.
Number of
Vehicles Emission Control System
1 Non-catalyst Baseline (1970 Model Year)
1 Oxidation Catalyst w/air injection
1 Oxidation Catalyst w/o air injection
2 Three-way Catalyst
1 Diesel
These categories represent a representative cross section of vehicle/emission
control technologies found on light-duty vehicles.
B. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated
Five of the six cars tested in this program were tested while operating
under malfunction conditions. These cars and their respective malfunctions
are listed in Table 12. It was originally planned to evaluate all five
cars at "rich best idle" (idle mixture adjusted to produce highest engine
speed at idle) in conjunction with an additional malfunction where appli-
cable, however, for two of the cars, the "rich best idle" configuration
was not attainable without considerable additional effort.
The carburetor on the Mercury Zephyr was designed to be nonadjustable,
therefore the "rich best idle" condition for the Zephyr was not possible
without defeating the purpose of the factory installed equipment. After
consulting with the Project Officer, a disabled air pump was selected as
an alternative malfunction. When an attempt was made to set the carburetor
on the Chevrolet Nova for "rich best idle" operation, only a slightly
richer configuration than the baseline could be obtained. Upon close
examination of the carburetor, it appeared to have been rebuilt at some
time prior to this program. This rebuilt configuration made it impossible
23
-------
TABLE 11. CARS SELECTED FOR TESTING
Car No.
91
92
93
94
95
96
Car
1970 Ford Fairlane
1980 Buick Century
1978 Chevrolet Nova
Engine
CID/Cyl
302/8
1981 Oldsmobile Delta 88 350/8
1982 Mercury Zephyr 200/6
1981 Volkswagen Rabbit 105/4
231/6
250/6
Emission Control
System
Non-Catalyst Baseline
Diesel
Three-way catalyst
Three-way catalyst
with closed loop fuel
system
Oxidation Catalyst
w/air pump
Oxidation Catalyst
Comment
Tested in a previous EPA project
as Car 74(4) *
Rented locally
Rented locally
Tested in a previous EPA project
as Car 85(7)
Rented locally
Rented locally
*Number in parentheses indicates reference at end of report.
-------
to achieve "rich best idle." One set of emissions tests was run at this
"richer idle" configuration and no major differences were found between the
baseline and the "richer idle" configurations. After consulting the
Project Officer, it was decided that no additional malfunction evaluations
would be performed on the Nova.
The Ford Fairlane, the Volkswagen Rabbit, and the Buick Century were
all run at the "rich best idle" setting. The Rabbit and the Century were
evaluated with a second malfunction in conjunction with the "rich best idle".
The Rabbit was evaluated with a disabled oxygen sensor (disconnected
electrical connection), and the Century was evaluated with a disabled air
pump (disconnected air hose with check valve inlet plugged).
TABLE 12. MALFUNCTION CONDITIONS EVALUATED
Car
Ford Fairlane
Mercury Zephyr
Volkswagen Rabbit
Buick Century
Chevrolet Nova
Car No.
91
93
94
95
96
Malfunction
Rich Best Idle
Disabled Air Pump
Rich Best Idle plus Disabled
Oxygen Sensor
Rich Best Idle plus Disabled
Air Pump
Richer Idle
Rich Best Idle not attainable
C. Car Testing
The six cars tested in this program were evaluated over the test
matrix shown in Table 13. As can be seen in the table, only selected
unregulated emissions were evaluated for each car. The emissions selected
were based on emissions results obtained from previous EPA unregulated
emission programs for the various emission control systems. With the
exception of the Chevrolet Nova, each set of emission tests (includes
Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC, and Hot Modified NYCC tests)
was conducted in duplicate or triplicate for each car. All cars, with
the exception of the Oldsmobile Delta 88, were run in a baseline con-
figuration and under a malfunction condition.
D. Regulated and Unregulated Emission Test Results
Summaries of the test results are included in Appendices B and C.
Appendix B presents a summary of the regulated emissions in grams per
minute, fuel consumption in liters per 100 minutes, and the unregulated
emissions in milligrams per minute, for all four types of emission tests.
Appendix C presents a summary of the regulated emissions in grams per
25
-------
TABLE 13. PROJECT TEST MATRIX
Baseline Configuration
Car
Car No.
Emissions
Regulated (HC,CO,NOX)
Fuel Consumption
Sulfate
Particulate
Hydrogen Cyanide
Ammonia
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Regulated (HC,CO,NOX)
Fuel Consumption
Sulfate
Particulate
Hydrogen Cyanide
Ammonia
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Fairlane
91
Delta
92
Number of
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
88 Zephyr
93
Evaluations
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Rabbit
94
2
2
2
2
Malfunction Configuration
Century
95
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Nova
96
Fairlane Delta 88 Zephyr Rabbit Century Nova
1
1
1
1
1
1
aAn additional Cold Idle Test was run due to variability in
emissions data.
DThe Fluoropore filters used to collect sulfate were weighed before
and after sampling to provide total particulate emissions. Pallflex
filters are normally used to determine particulate emissions.
' One additional cold and one additional hot modified NYCC test were run.
26
-------
kilometer, fuel consumption in liters per 100 kilometers, and the unreg-
ulated emissions in milligrams per kilometer for the modified NYCC emission
tests. The computer printouts for the regulated emissions are included
in Appendix D. Regulated emissions are listed on the computer printouts
in grams per minute for the idle tests, and in both grams per minute and
grams per kilometer for the modified NYCC tests. Fuel consumption is
presented in a. similar manner, liters per 100 minutes for the idle and
modified NYCC tests, and liters per 100 kilometers for the modified NYCC
tests. The analyses and discussion of these test results are included
in Section V of this report.
In the summary data tables, dashes (—) have been used when no test
data were available. This occurs for the unregulated emissions when
valid test data could not be obtained due to instrument malfunction or
loss of the sample. Blanks are left in the tables where the analyses
were excluded in accordance with the program scope of work.
E. Other Testing
Additional emission tests were conducted on the Ford Fairlane and
the Chevrolet Nova. These tests included: 30 second cold start idle
tests for the Fairlane and Nova, additional hot modified NYCC tests at
elevated inertia weight settings for the Fairlane and Nova, and addi-
tional Cold Idle - Rich Best Idle configuration tests for the Fairlane.
The 30 second cold start idle test consists of taking a grab sample
during the entire first 30 seconds of the Cold Idle test. These tests
were performed to determine the extent of differences in emissions
between the first 30 seconds of cold start operation and the entire 5
minute Cold Idle test. The results for the 30 second cold idle tests
are presented in Table 14 along with the results for the corresponding
regular Cold Idle tests. Computer printouts for these additional tests
can be found in Tables E-l and E-2 of Appendix E.
Both the Ford Fairlane and the Chevrolet Nova gave higher hydrocarbon
emissions in the 30 second tests than in the Cold Idle tests, reflecting
the starting of the vehicle. However, for the Fairlane, the fuel con-
sumption rate and the carbon monoxide emissions were lower in the 30 second
test than in the Cold Idle test; while the reverse was found to be the
case for the Chevrolet Nova. Both cars had low NOX emissions in the 30
second test. Ammonia was the only unregulated emission analyzed in the
30 second test for the Fairlane. The ammonia emission rate, 3.14 g/min,
was considerably lower than the ammonia emission rate for the complete
five minute Cold Idle test, 29.89 mg/min. These differences may be due
to the fact that the ammonia sample is first collected in a Tedlar bag
during the 30 second test, and then bubbled through impingers to concen-
trate the sample. It is possible that a major portion of the sample could
have been lost on the walls of the sample bag. Aldehydes and ketones were
the only unregulated emissions evaluated in the 30 second Nova testing.
The aldehydes and ketones from the two tests, 30 second and Cold Idle,
27
-------
differ considerably. Once again this may be due to sample losses during
collection of the exhaust in the 30 second test. The methylethylketone
emissions for the 30 second test may be directly related to the high
hydrocarbon emissions.
TABLE 14. THIRTY SECOND COLD IDLE TESTING
Ford Fairlane
Cold Idle
First 30
Seconds of Cold Idle
Test 917 Test 917
Chevrolet Nova
Cold Idle
First 30
Seconds of Cold Idle
Test 963 Test 963
Hydrocarbons, g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Fuel Cons., &/100 rain
Ammonia, mg/min
Total Aldehydes &
Ket on es, mg/km
Formaldehyde, mg/min
Acrolein, mg/min
Methylethylketone, mg/min
Benzaldehyde, mg/min
2.36
6.67
0.09
4.01
3.14a
1.20
20.30
0.10
6.45
28.89
7.34
77.89
0.03
9.05
5.6C
ND
ND
5.58a
ND
3.87
27.59
0.85
8.33
2.9
0.47
ND
0.27
2.13
Data may be erronous due to the necessity of using a different
unvalidated sampling protocol for this 30 second sample.
The additional Hot Modified NYCC tests for the Fairlane and Nova
consisted of operating the cars over the cycles at an inertia weight
approximately 25 percent higher than the normal inertia weight setting
(4875 pounds instead of 4000 pounds). The elevated inertia weight tests
were run to simulate a vehicle ascending a parking garage ramp, and to
compare the resulting emissions to those from the normal tests. The
results for the Hot Modified NYCC tests with increased vehicle inertia
weight along with the results for the regular Hot Modified NYCC tests
are presented in Table 15. Computer printouts for the elevated inertia
weight tests are included in Tables E-3 and E-4 of Appendix E.
28
-------
TABLE 15. HOT MODIFIED NYCC ELEVATED INERTIA WEIGHT TESTING
Ford Fairlane
Chevrolet Nova
Test Result
Test 917
Inertia
4875 Ibs
Test 917
Inertia
4000 Ibs
Test 967
Inertia
4875 Ibs
Test 967
Inertia
4000 Ibs
Hydrocarbons, g/min 0.62 0.57 0.24 0.27
Carbon Monoxide, g/min 17.52 16.82 0.25 0.27
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min 0.26 0.18 0.22 0.21
Fuel Cons., £/100 km 5.40 5.23 3.83 3.81
Sulfate, mg/min ND ND
Hydrogen Sulfide, mg/min ND ND ND ND
Cyanide, mg/min 0.08 1.57 0.53 0.47
Ammonia, mg/min 17.23 6.66 — 6.22
Aldehydes & Ketones, mg/min 1.0 1.0 3.2 2.9
Formaldehyde, mg/min ND ND 1.74 1.30
Acrolein, mg/min ND ND ND ND
For the Ford Fairlane, the additional Hot Modified NYCC test (inertia
weight of 4875 pounds), with the exception of the cyanide and ammonia
emissions, gave only slightly higher emissions and fuel consumption than
the 4000 pound inertia test. However, the ammonia emission rate for the
4875 pound inertia test was similar to a second 4000 pound inertia test
conducted on a different test day (16.51 mg/min). For the Chevrolet Nova,
the two Hot Modified NYCC tests gave almost identical emissions, indicating
little or no difference in emissions due to the increased inertia weight
setting for the vehicle.
During the Cold Idle - Rich Best Idle Configuration tests and the
Cold Modified NYCC - Baseline Configuration tests, the choke on the Ford
Fairlane was apparently operational for different periods of time resulting
in varying levels of emissions and fuel consumption. Two additional
Cold Idle - Rich Best Idle Configuration tests, tests 918 and 919, were
performed (no unregulated emissions) to determine the predominant choke
operation. The results of these tests along with the original two Cold
Idle tests (916 and 917) are as follows:
Test Result
HC, g/min
CO, g/min
NOX, g/min
Fuel Cons., g/min
Test 916 Test 917 Test 918 Test 919
1.96
48.78
0.72
12.09
1.20
20.30
0.10
6.45
2.43
52.02
0.67
12.30
1.35
18.48
0.17
7.17
29
-------
The disparity in these results indicates the reality of the Cold
Idle - Rich Best Idle emission variations and the variability of the choke
operation in this automobile. The computer printouts for Cold Idle tests
918 and 919 are included as Tables E-5 and E-6 in Appendix E.
30
-------
V. ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS
This section reports the analyses performed on the emissions data
generated in this project. The analyses involved averaging and refor-
matting the data to enable making various comparisons. Due to the very
limited number of data points for each pollutant at each specific condition,
advanced statistical analyses were judged to be inapplicable. In addition
to presenting the data in formats that enable ready review and comparisons,
these results are also compared with results obtained in several previous
related projects.
A. Regulated Emissions and Fuel Consumption
The initial analyses of the data involved averaging the results for
the duplicate or triplicate baseline and malfunction tests. These averages
are included with the individual test data in Appendices B and C. A
summary of the average regulated emissions (in g/min) and fuel consumption
(in £/100 min) data is presented in Table 16. In general, the test data
in Table 16 indicate higher emissions and fuel consumption rates for the
Cold Idle and Cold Modified NYCC tests as compared to their hot operation
counterparts, and higher emissions and fuel consumption rates during
malfunction operation compared to baseline operation. Malfunction operation
significantly increased carbon monoxide emissions (increases occurred in
17 of the possible 20 test situations) from an overall program average of
5.35 g/min to 18.5 g/min. Increases in hydrocarbons (13 of 20 tests, from
0.79 to 0.86 g/min) and NOX (11 of 20 tests, from 0.10 to 0.24) were not
as consistent. While repeat hot operation tests showed little test-to-test
variability in emissions, the Cold Idle and Cold Modified NYCC tests revealed
a much greater degree of variability in the emissions. This variability
was apparently due to inconsistencies in the choke operation, as discussed
in Section IV.
B. Aldehyde and Ketone Emissions
Ten individual aldehydes and ketones were evaluated in this program:
Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, croton-
aldehyde, isobutyraldehyde, methylethylketone, benzaldehyde, and hexan-
aldehyde. The 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine absorbing reagent purchased for
use in this program was found to contain significant amounts of acetone-
DNPH derivatives. These levels prevented accurate measurements of exhaust
acetone concentrations. Average emission results are summarized for the
remaining nine aldehydes and ketones, as well as the total aldehydes
and ketones, in Table 17. Program averages (all test points) for the
aldehydes ranged from 0.03 mg/min for acrolein to 0.95 mg/min for methyl-
ethylketone. While one or more of the aldehydes or ketones were found
in 99 percent of the samples analyzed, the individual aldehydes were
detected less frequently, (in 12 percent of the samples for acrolein to
87 percent for methylethylketone). The highest individual aldehyde
31
-------
TABLE 16. SUMMARY OF THE AVERAGE REGULATED EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION DATA
HC (g/min)
OJ
to
Baseline
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
1.95
0.17
0.55
0.33
1.49
3.03
0.25
0.17
0.46
0.01
0.34
0.40
0.64
0.25
0.24
0.09
3.68
1.31
0.29
0.15
0.06
0.01
0.35
0.39
Malfunction
1.58
a
1.66
1.02
1.37
1.75
0.58
0.50
0.76
0.56
0.27
0.87
0.88
0.91
0.70
0.76
0.58
0.62
0.95
0.57
0.27
CO
Baseline
46.48
0.39
5.67
2.60
1.89
26.56
0.57
0.38
3.54
0.02
0.02
0.07
9.75
0.49
2.16
0.67
1.29
3.68
1.13
0.37
0.25
0.14
0.28
0.14
(g/min)
NOX
Malfunction Baseline
34.54
29.21
31.63
47.81
23.91
17.56
4.22
28.31
11.34
0.07
Cold
19.45
12.13
30.48
12.58
5.23
Hot
17.24
6.30
29.76
8.19
0.20
Cold Idle
0.70
0.20
0.57
0.11
0.26
0.77
Hot Idle
0.08
0.19
0.08
0.05
0.02
0.05
Modified NYCC
0.22
0.19
0.17
0.12
0.10
0.22
Modified NYCC
0.23
0.19
0.15
0.07
0.06
0.12
(g/min)
Malfunction
0.41
0.97
0.03
0.11
0.86
0.06
0.10
0.02
0.14
0.08
0.18
0.22
0.09
0.30
0.34
0.19
0.22
0.06
0.36
0.19
Fuel Consumption
(VlOO min)
Baseline Malfunction
11.78
3.59
7.78
2.91
5.43
8.35
4.06
3.25
2.19
.06
,38
2.
2,
2.63
6.28
3.84
3.74
2.75
3.68
4.18
4.82
3.63
2.95
2.35
3.20
3.36
9.27
9.08
3.96
8.26
8.14
4.49
2.24
3.17
3.79
3.10
5.92
3.69
3.88
4.87
4.64
5.19
2.93
3.56
4.48
3.76
Blanks appear
scope of work
in the table where evaluations were excluded in accordance with the program
-------
TABLE 17. SUMMARY OF ALDEHYDE AND KETONE EMISSIONS
ui
U)
Forma1dehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Is obutyraldehyde
MethylethyIketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Total Aldehydes
and Ketones
Program
Average,
mg/mina
0.79
0.27
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.95
0.64
0.07
2.9
Frequency
of Detection,
Percent
69
53
12
35
18
33
87
82
20
99
Maximum
Emission for
Single Condition
mg/min"
3.97
2.17
0.30
0.54
0.36
0.59
2.83
2.13
0.71
9.2
Average for All
Test Points
One Car,
Maximum,
mg/min (Car No. )
1.98 (91)
0.76 (91)
0.07 (91)
0.21 (91)
0.13 (91)
0.23 (91)
1.47 (94)
0.92 (91)
0.16 (95)
4.7 (91)
Increase or Decrease
in Emissions as a
Result of Malfunction,
Car No.d
Increase Decrease
91,94 95
91,94 93,95,96
91,95
94 91,95
95
94 95
93 94,95
91,93,94
95
91,93,94 95
Average of the'44 Car-test-configuration values obtained in the program
^Maximum value of the 44 car-test-configuration combinations evaluated
"Maximum value obtained when averaging all test points for each
individual test car
Increase or decrease in three of the four tests (Cold Idle, Hot Idle,
Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC) and in the average value for
the four tests when comparing the baseline and malfunction conditions
-------
emission rate for an individual car-test-configuration (average of duplicate
or triplicate tests) was 3.97 mg/min formaldehyde. This result occurred
during the Hot Idle-Rich Best Idle testing of the Ford Fairlane. This car-
test-configuration combination also produced the highest levels of acetal-
dehyde (2.17 mg/min), acrolein (0.30 mg/min), and crotonaldehyde (0.36
mg/min). Overall, Cold or Hot Idle operation produced the highest emission
levels for eight of the nine compounds. Of the six test cars, the non-
catalyst-equipped Ford Fairlane, Car 91, produced the highest overall
average levels for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, propionaldehyde,
crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde, benzaldehyde, and total aldehydes and
ketones. The Volkswagen Rabbit, Car 94, produced the highest levels of
methylethylketone, while the Buick Century produced the highest levels
of hexanaldehyde.
In general, malfunction operation, as compared to baseline operation,
produced higher aldehyde emissions for Cars 91, 93, and 94, and lower
aldehyde emissions for Car 95. The malfunction configuration for Cars 91,
94, and 95 all included the "Rich Best Idle" configuration, but the Car 95
malfunction also included a disconnected air pump. The "Rich Best Idle"
condition appears to have increased the aldehydes for Cars 91 and 94,
while the disconnected air pump appears to have reversed this trend in
Car 95. The malfunction for Car 93 was also a disconnected air pump,
however, increases in methylethylketone and benzaldehyde emissions were
noted for this car. Acetaldehyde and the remaining aldehydes decreased,
to some degree, as was noted for Car 95.
C. Other Unregulated Emissions
The remainder of the unregulated emissions measured in this program
include hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, total cyanide, sulfate and particulate.
As directed in the scope of work, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and cyanide
were sampled only for Cars 91, 93, 94, and 96; while sulfate was sampled
only for Cars 91, 92, and 95. The Fluoropore filters used to collect
sulfate during the baseline operation of Cars 91, 92 and 95, and the
malfunction operation of Car 95 were weighed before and after sampling
to provide total particulate emission rates. While those rates are not
determined in the conventional manner (particulate collected on glass
fiber or coated glass fiber filters), they do provide additional infor-
mation at a minimum cost.
Hydrogen sulfide was not detected in any of the samples analyzed in
this program. The minimum detection limit for hydrogen sulfide, as de-
fined in Section III, is 0.10 mg/min. If hydrogen sulfide was present
in the exhaust, it was below this level. This result is consistent with
previous investigators, who showed that H2S is only detectable under very
specific operating conditions of alternating high speed and idle
operation.^
34
-------
A summary of the average ammonia, cyanide, sulfate, and particulate
emissions is presented in Table 18. In general, higher ammonia emissions
were noted for the idle tests as compared to the modified NYCC tests. Cars
93 and 94, both equipped with three-way catalysts, gave higher baseline
ammonia emissions than the non-catalyst-equipped Car 91 and the oxidation
catalyst-equipped Car 96. The non-catalyst-equipped Car 91, however, gave
the highest ammonia emissions for the program while operating at the mal-
functioning "Rich Best Idle" condition. Car 91 was the only car that
gave consistently higher ammonia emissions for the malfunction configuration
when compared to the baseline configuration.
For total cyanide, the Cold Idle test repeatedly gave higher emission
levels than the remaining three tests. All four cars evaluated had higher
cyanide emissions for the malfunction configuration than for the baseline
configuration. Of the four cars, Car 91 had the highest baseline cyanide
emissions during Cold Idle operation, while Car 94 had the highest mal-
function cyanide emissions during Hot Modified NYCC operation.
The highest sulfate levels for the three cars evaluated were from Car
92, the Oldsmobile Delta 88 Diesel. Sulfate emissions increased from
Car 91 and decreased from Car 95 when the cars were malfunctioning. Parti-
culate emissions, as expected, were highest for Car 92 (Diesel) and lowest
for Car 95 (oxidation catalyst with air pump) and intermediate for Car 91
(no catalyst).
D. Comparison of Results with Previous Projects
In Tables 19 through 24, the emission rates of the six cars evaluated
in this program have been compared to the emission rates of equivalent
or similar cars tested in previous projects.(1>4,7,11) flie emissions from
previous projects were obtained by operating the cars over the Federal
Test Procedure (FTP), and were reported in grams or milligrams per kilo-
meter. These values, g/km or mg/km, have been converted to g/min or
mg/min for the FTP to enable comparisons with average emissions (average
of Cold Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and the Hot Modified NYCC
emissions) obtained in this program. The conversion to g/min or mg/min
for the FTP was made by multiplying the emission rates in g/km by the
number of kilometers driven, (12 km) and then dividing by the total time
of the test in minutes (22.87 min).
The non-catalyst-equipped Car 91 had lower hydrocarbon, NOX, parti-
culate, sulfate, and aldehyde emissions at low speed and idle than on the
FTP, however, the reverse was observed for the ammonia and cyanide emis-
sions. The Diesel Car 92 had low-speed/idle emissions which were similar
to FTP emissions for a 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Diesel. The four catalyst-
equipped cars (93, 94, 95, and 96), in general, had higher low-speed/idle
emissions than equivalent or similar cars operating over the FTP cycle.
These higher emissions may be the result of lower catalyst temperatures
during the low-speed/idle conditions.
35
-------
GJ
TABLE 18. SUMMARY OF THE AVERAGE AMMONIA, CYANIDE, SULFATE, AND PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
Ammonia, mg/min Cyanide, mg/min Sulfate, mg/min Particulate, mg/min
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Car 91
Car 92
Car 93
Car 94
Car 95
Car 96
Baseline
8.86
a
14.88
22.53
13.53
6.26
26.46
25.56
19.69
3.81
17.52
10.06
7.14
3.29
9.17
9.42
7.16
Malfunction
33.86
12.59
18.66
__b
28.39
14.99
17.33
18.52
13.92
1.02
8.53
12.94
11.59
6.48
11.24
4.38
Baseline
3.31
0.79
0.63
2.60
0.64
0.78
0.48
0.42
Cold
0.24
0.44
0.46
0.44
Hot
0.07
0.15
0.18
0.17
Malfunction Baseline Malfunction Baseline Malfunction
Cold Idle
2.93 0.00
1.16
3.02
2.67
0.43
2.47
Hot Idle
1.84 0.00
0.51
2.06
3.70
0.49
0.65
Modified NYCC
2.12 0.00
1.75
1.68
3.68
0.14
0.82
Modified NYCC
1.61 0.00
0.87
2.12
4.14
0.17
0.42
0.18 41.3
103.5
0.31 16.06 10.94
0.21 35.9
72.1
0.30 12.06 5.34
0.08 20.0
103.5
0.16 8.14 4.39
0.11 15.4
83.2
0.12 7.97 1.49
SBlanks appear in the table where the analyses were excluded in accordance with the program
.scope of work
No valid test data obtained
-------
TABLE 19. COMPARISON OF CAR 91 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emissions in mg/min, except as noted
Car 91 Average Results
This Project5
Rich Best
Idle
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Other Compounds
Total Aldehydes &
Ketones0
Ammonia
Cyanide and Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Is obuty raldehyde
Me thy le thy Ik e ton e
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Baseline
0.78
14.51
0.31
28.2
ND
3.9
5.56
1.07
ND
1.55
0.51
0.11
0.26
6.70
Car 91 FTP Results
Previous Project13
Rich Best
Idle
0.90
22.20
0.21
0.15
5.5
21.94
2.13
ND
2.42
1.00
0.02
0.19
Unmodified
1.23
6.84
1.92
50.2
0.14
12.0
2.51
0.46
ND
11.17
0.75
0.12
1.97
26.27
1.74
58.65
0.24
11.9
2.48
1.14
ND
10.55
1.34
0.03
0.13
0.27
0.32
0.65
0.12
0.12
0.22
0.26 ND ND
1.18
0.15 ND ND
Fuel Consumption (&/100 miri)
6.22
8.54
9.45
Values are average of the four tests conducted in this program, the Cold
Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC tests.
DAverage emission rates for Car 91 in unmodified and Rich Best Idle
Configurations, Tasks 4 and 5, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2884 (Car 91
^was known as Car 74 in Contract 68-03-2884).
"Total aldehydes are defined as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
methylethylketone, benzaldehyde, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the
LC-UV method for this program and as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acetone (includes acrolein and propionaldehyde), methylethylketone and
hexanaldehydes as determined by the GC-FID method for the previous work.
37
-------
TABLE 20. COMPARISON OF CAR 92 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emissions in mg/min, except as noted
Car 92 Average Results 1981 Olds Cutlass FTP
This Program3 Results Previous Project13
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/min 0.19 0.06
Carbon Monoxide, g/min 0.41 0.34
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min 0.19 0.34
Particulates
Total Particulates 90.6 126
Sulfate 1.08
Total Aldehydes &
Ketonesc 1.9 0.6
Aldheydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde ND 0.6
Acetaldehyde 0.31 ND
Acrolein 0.03
Propionaldehyde 0.11
Acetone — ND
Crotonaldehyde 0.04
Isobutyraldehyde 0.13
Methylethylketone 1-18 ND
Benzaldehyde 0.10
Hexanaldehyde ND ND
Fuel Consumption (VlOO min)
3.56 5.61
aValues are average of the four tests conducted in this program, the Cold
Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC tests.
bAverage emission rates for a 1981 Diesel Oldsmobile Cutlass. This
vehicle has the same engine size as the vehicle used in this program
(350 CID/8 Cyl) and was run on the same fuel, EM-329-F, EPA Contract
No. 68-02-2703.
GTotal aldehydes are defined as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
methylethylketone, benzaldehyde, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the
LC-UV method for this program and as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acetone (includes acrolein and propionaldehyde), methylethylketone and
hexanaldehyde as determined by the GC-FID method for the previous work.
38
-------
TABLE 21. COMPARISON OF CAR 93 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emissions in mg/min, except as noted
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Compounds
Total Aldehydes &
Ketonesc 1.5
Ammonia 17.01
Cyanide & Cyanogen 0.54
Hydrogen Sulfide ND
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde 0.25
Acetaldehyde 0.20
Acrolein 0.04
Propionaldehyde 0.03
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde 0.03
Isobutyraldehyde 0.09
Methylethylketone 0.33
Benzaldehyde 0.38
Hexanaldehyde 0.08
Car 93 Average Results
This Project5
Baseline
0.33
2.91
0.24
No Air
0.92
12.97
0.38
3.2
8.77
2.22
ND
0.31
0,15
ND
0.01
ND
ND
1.75
0.95
0.01
1981 Ford Escort - FTP
Results Previous Project"
0.12
1.41
0.18
0.01
0.05
ND
ND
ND
ND
Fuel Consumption (&/100 min)
4.17
4.49
5.03
Values are average of the four tests conducted in this program, the Cold
Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC tests.
DAverage emission rates for a 1981 Ford Escort Vehicle has a smaller engine
(1.6 £/4 cyl), but the same emission control system. Tasks 11 and 12, EPA
Contract No0 68-03-2884, and Work Assignments 1 and 3, EPA Contract No.
68-03-3073. (The Escort was known as Car 81 in the previous work).
CTotal aldehydes are defined as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
methylethylketone, benzaldehyde, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the
LC-UV method for this program and as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acetone (includes acrolein and propionaldehyde), methylethylketone and
hexanaldehydes as determined by the GC-FID method for the previous work.
39
-------
TABLE 22. COMPARISON OF CAR 94 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emissions in mg/min, except as noted
Car 94 FTP Results
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Other Compounds
Total Aldehydes &
Ke tones0
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Car 94 Average Results
This Project5
RBI+Disconn
02 Sensor
Baseline
0.11
0.29
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min 0.09
2.4
16.89
0.44
ND
0.11
0.06
ND
0.08
ND
0.06
1.88
0.18
ND
0.91
30.05
0.05
2.5
13.94
3.55
ND
0.54
0.17
ND
0.12
0.01
0.08
1.06
0.45
0.05
Previous Project*3
0.04
0.35
0.05
ND
8.92
0.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Fuel Consumption (&/100 min)
2.52
3.64
5.19
aValues are average of the four tests conducted in this program, the Cold
Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC tests.
bAverage emission rates for Car 94, Tasks 11 and 12, EPA Contract 68-03-2884
and Work Assignments 1 and 3 Contract 68-03-3073. (Car 94 was known as
Car 85 in Contracts 68-03-2884 and 68-03-3073).
cTotal aldehydes are defined as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
methylethylketone, benzaldehyde, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the
LC-UV method for this program and as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acetone (includes acrolein and propionaldehyde), methylethylketone and
hexanaldehyde as determined by the GC-FID method for the previous work.
40
-------
TABLE 23. COMPARISON OF CAR 95 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emissions in mg/min, except as noted
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Particulate
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Total Aldehydes and
Ketonesc
Aldehydes & Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde-
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
CrotonaIdehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
MethylethyIketone
Benzaldehyde
HexanaIdehyde
Car 95 Average Results
This Project3
Baseline
1.47
0.87
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min 0.11
11.1
0.31
5.3
1.89
0.28
0.10
0.14
0.12
0.11
1.36
0.96
0.30
RBI+No Air
0.80
19.98
0.23
5.5
0.22
2.0
0.37
0.13
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.82
0.62
0.03
1978 Chev. Malibu FTP
Results Previous Project
Unmodified RBI+No Air
0.10
1.13
0.23
1.8
0.38
0.8
0.63
0.08
ND
ND
0.03
0.03
Fuel Consumption (fc/100 min)
0.65
27.77
0.15
8.0
0.38
6.0
0.81
1.82
1.12
ND
2.13
0.18
3.67
5.35
9.14
9.36
Values are average of the four tests conducted in this program, the Cold
Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC tests.
DAverage emission rates for a 1978 Chevrolet Malibu (305 CID/8 cyl) in
unmodified and Rich Best Idle + disconnected air pump configurations,
EPA Contract No. 68-03-2499. This car had an oxidation catalyst and an
^air pump and was known as Car 13 in Contract 68-03-2499.
"Total aldehydes are defined as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, crotonaIdehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
methylethyIketone, benzaldehyde, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the
LC-UV method for this program and as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acetone (includes acrolein and propionaldehyde) isobutyraldehyde, methyl-
ethylketone and hexanaldehyde as determined by the GC-FID method for the
previous work.
41
-------
TABLE 24. COMPARISONS OF CAR 96 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emissions in mg/min, except as noted
Car 96 Average Results
This Project3
Baseline "Richer Idle"
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
1978 Chev. Malibu FTP
Results Previous Project^
Unmodified Rich Best Idle
Other Compounds
Total Aldehydes &
Ketones0
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
1.24
8.15
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min 0.29
2.6
12.03
0.91
ND
0.71
0.15
ND
0.05
0.76
7.35
0.37
1.7
11.95
1.09
ND
0.58
0.03
ND
ND
0.16
2.91
0.39
0.9
1.61
0.31
ND
0.58
0.16
0.57
13.65
0.30
2.0
9.40
1.46
0.06
0.69
0.22
0.02
ND
0.64
1.05
ND
0.01
0.01
0.53
0.52
0.02
Fuel Consumption
0.03
ND
0.03
0.06
(X-/100 min)
ND
0.02
0.10
0.02
4.67
4.91
7.20
7.69
aValues are average of the four tests conducted in this program, the Cold
Idle, Hot Idle, Cold Modified NYCC and Hot Modified NYCC tests.
bAverage emission rates for a 1978 Chevrolet Malibu (305 CID/8 cyl) in
unmodified and Rich Best Idle configurations, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2499.
This car had an oxidation catalyst and was known as Car 12 in Contract
68-03-2499.
cTotal aldehydes are defined as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acrolein, propionaldehyde, acetone, crotonaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
methylethylketone, benzaldehyde, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the
LC-UV method for this program and as the sum of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acetone, (includes acrolein and propionaldehyde), isobutyraldehyde, methyl-
ethylketone, and hexanaldehyde as determined by the GC-FID method for the
previous work.
42
-------
REFERENCES
1. Urban, C.M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Mal-
functioning Non-Catalyst and Oxidation Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles,"
Final Report EPA 460/3-80-003 prepared under Contract No. 68-03-2499,
January 1980.
2. Urban, C.M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Mal-
functioning Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles," Final Report
EPA 460/3-80-004 prepared under Contract No. 68-03-2588, January 1980.
3. Urban, C.M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from a Mal-
functioning Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline Automobile," Final Report
EPA 460/3-80-005 prepared under Contract No. 68-03-2692. January 1980.
4. Urban, C.M., "Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Non-Catalyst Baseline
Cars Under Malfunction Conditions," Final Report EPA 460/3-81-020
prepared under Tasks 4 and 5 of Contract No. 68-03-2884, 1981.
5. Smith, L.R., "Characterization of Emissions from Motor Vehicles
Designed for Low NOX Emissions," Final Report EPA 600/2-80-176 prepared
under Contract No. 68-02-2497, July 1980.
6. Smith, L.R., "Characterization of Exhaust Emissions from High Mileage
Catalyst-Equipped Automobiles," Final Report EPA 460/3-81-024 prepared
under Tasks 7 and 10 of Contract No. 68-03-2884, September 1981.
7. Smith, L.R., and Urban, C.M., "Characterization of Exhaust Emissions
from Methanol- and Gasoline-Fueled Automobiles," Final Report
EPA 460/3-82-004 prepared under Tasks 11 and 12 of Contract No.
68-03-2884 and Work Assignments 1 and 3 of Contract No. 68-03-3072,
August 1982.
8. Dietzmann, H.E., et al. "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing
Unregulated Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles," Report EPA
600/2-79-017, prepared under Contract No. 68-02-2497, February 1979.
9. Smith L.R., et al. "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing Unregulated
Emissions from Vehicles Using Middle-Distillate Fuels," Interim Report
EPA 600/2-80-068, prepared under Contract No. 68-02-2703.
10. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 85, Subpart H,
Sections applicable to Light-Duty Vehicles.
11. Montalvo, D.A., and Hare, C.T., "Characterization of Emissions From
Advanced Automotive Power Plant Concepts." Draft Final Report to the
Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-02-2703,
February 1982.
43
-------
REFERENCES (Cont'd)
12. U.S. HEW "Registry of Toxic Effect of Chemical Substances," 1976 and
1978 Editions.
13. Proceedings of the 1968 American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists as reported in the Fifth Edition of the "Matheson Gas Data
Book."
14. Cadle, S. and Malawa, T., "Sulfide Emissions from Catalyst Equipped
Cars," Environmental Science Department, G.M. Research Laboratories,
1977.
44
-------
APPENDIX A
CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
-------
APPENDIX A. CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
This appendix documents the calculational methods used for the unre-
gulated emissions. All values not defined (i.e., CVS FLOW, VOL, etc.)
are obtained from the computer printouts for the regulated emissions.
Example printout is included as Appendix Table A-l.
A. Calculation of mg/km
ing/km = [(EXH, yg/m3 * SCF - BG, yg/m3 x DFC) x VOL * KM] v 1000
Calculations were performed using a Hewlett-Packard HP-65
Programmable Calculator.
Dry (DFC) and (SFC) were used for all unregulated emissions.
DFC and SFC are obtained from the computer printout for regulated
emissions. (See Table A-l).
B. Calculation of mg/min
mg/min = [(EXH, yg/m3 x SCF - BG, yg/m3 x DFC) x VOL 4- MIN] r 1000
Calculations performed as in A with the exception of distance in KM
being replaced in the equation with time in MIN.
C. Definition of Computer Printout Nomenclature
The following are primarily exerpts taken from the computer program:
C DFC = DILUTION FACTOR CORRECTION DFC = FOR WET SAMPLES DFCD = FOR DRY
DF(J)=13.4/( YC2(2,J) +(( YH(2,J) + CC(2,J))/10000.))
DFC(J) = 1 - 1/DF(J)
A-2
-------
TABLE A-l. COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE
TEST NO. RUN
VEHICLE MODEL
ENGINE L( CID)
TRANSMISSION
BAROMETER MM HG( IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
M NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
f NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
*> DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.
DATE
BAG CART NO.
DYNO NO.
CVS NO.
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
H-NY
DEG C(
GM/KG
OEG F)
TEST WEIGHT KG( LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD KW( HP)
GASOLINE
ODOMETER KM( MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
-------
APPENDIX B
INDIVIDUAL IDLE AND MODIFIED NYCC TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
Emissions Listed in Grains per Minute or
Milligrams per Minute
Fuel Consumption Listed in Liters per One
Hundred Minutes
-------
TABLE B-l. CAR 91 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1970 FORD FAIRLANE
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., i/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
911
737.9
12.0
195.7
11.65
1.91
45.28
0.70
29.4
0.00
0.00
3.31
5.51
5.7
2.96
0.93
0.20
0.38
0.23
0.44
0.00
0.28
0.26
Cold Idle
912
736.9
11.0
196.8
11.90
1.99
47.87
0.70
53.2
0.00
0.00
3.31
12.20
4.1
0.79
0.27
0.00
0.21
—
0.00
0.21
1.49
1.10
0.00
Average
737.4
11.5
196.3
11.78
1.95
46.58
0.70
41.3
0.00
0.00
3.31
8.86
4.9
1.88
0.60
0.10
0.30
--
0.12
0.33
0.75
0.69
0.13
911
737.9
12.7
92.8
4.03
0.25
0.56
0.08
43.8
0.00
0.00
0.50
7.11
8.5
2.06
1.12
0.60
0.80-
—
0.71
0.94
0.42
1.26
0.57
Hot Idle
912
736.9
11.0
94.0
4.08
0.24
0.58
0.08
28.0
0.00
0.00
0.77
5.40
5.6
3.47
1.23
0.00
0.20
—
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.43
0.00
Average
737.4
11.9
93.4
4.06
0.25
0.57
0.08
35.9
0.00
0.00
0.64
6.26
7.1
2.77
1.18
0.30
0.50
—
0.36
0.47
0.33
0.85
0.29
-------
TABLE B-l Cont'd). CAR 91 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1970 FORD FAIRLANE
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mq/min (Except as Noted)
w
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., A/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonal deny de
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyle thy Iketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
911
735.6
11.3
129.7
6.72
0.84
15.81
0.20
23.4
0.00
0.00
0.31
3.61
0.5
0.04
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
912
736.9
11.0
128.6
5.83
0.44
3.68
0.24
16.6
0.00
0.00
0.17
4.01
1.9
1.05
0.20
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.47
0.00
Average
736.3
11.2
129.2
6.28
0.64
9.75
0.22
20.0
0.00
0.00
0.24
3.81
1.2
0.55
0.15
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.43
0.00
Hot Modified NYCC
911
737.9
11.7
110.9
4.83
0.30
1.14
0.24
18.8
0.00
0.00
0.13
3.53
2.2
0.82
0.09
0.08
0.06
0.10
0.16
0.03
0.77
0.08
912
736.9
11.0
110.2
4.80
0.28
1.11
0.22
12.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.05
2.3
1.20
0.14
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.07
0.36
0.47
0.00
Average
737.3
11.4
110.6
4.82
0.29
1.13
0.23
15.4
0.00
0.00
0.07
3.29
2.3
1.01
0.12
0.04
0.08
0.05
0.12
0.20
0.62
0.04
-------
TABLE B-2. CAR 91 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1970 FORD FAIRLANE
RICH BEST IDLE
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
CD
Cold Idle
Test Number, VVT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons. , Ji/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
916
742.2
12.4
200.2
12.09
1.96
48.78
0.72
0.35
0.00
4.23
38.86
8.8
3.07
1.37
0.00
0.56
—
0.00
0.85
—
2.96
0.00
917
739.9
10.5
115.5
6.45
1.20
20.30
0.10
0.00
0.00
1.63
28.89
8.2
4.13
1.44
0.18
0.51
—
0.37
0.32
—
0.65
0.56
Average
741.1
11.5
157.9
9.27
1.58
34.54
0.41
0.18
0.00
2.93
33.86
8.5
3.60
1.41
0.09
0.54
—
0.19
0.59
—
1.81
0.28
916
742.2
10.9
76.6
4.53
0.61
17.55
0.06
0.42
0.00
2.09
48.14
11.5
4.59
4.34
0.00
0.34
—
0.45
0.35
0.00
0.89
0.57
Hot Idle
917
739.9
10.5
74.8
4.45
0.55
17.57
0.05
0.00
0.00
1.69
8.64
5.1
3.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.19
1.55
0.00
Average
741.1
10.7
75.7
4.49
0.58
17.56
0.06
0.21
0.00
1.84
28.39
8.3
3.97
2.17
0.00
0.17
—
0.23
0.18
0.10
1.22
0.30
-------
TABLE B-2 (COnt'd) .
CAR 91 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1970 FORD FAIRLANE
RICH BEST IDLE
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons . , £/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
w Total Particulates
0! Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Me thy le thy Ike tone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehvde
916
742.4
10.7
105.1
6.16
0.76
23.38
0.19
0.15
0.00
1.96
15.29
3.6
1.40
0.23
0.00
0.06
—
0.10
0.13
0.63
1.05
0.00
Cold Modified
917
737.4
12.3
105.5
5.67
0.97
15.51
0.17
0.00
0.00
2.28
12.54
4.0
2.54
0.34
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.91
0.00
NYCC
Average
739.9
11.5
105.3
5.92
0.87
19.45
0.18
0.08
0.00
2.12
13.92
3.8
1.97
0.29
0.00
0.00
—
0.05
0.07
0.44
0.98
0.00
Hot Modified NYCC
916
740.2
10.7
90.6
5.15
0.58
17.66
0.19
0.21
0.00
1.65
16.51
1.5
0.23
0.09
0.00
0.06
—
0.00
0.03
0.32
0.78
0.00
917
739.9
10.5
93.7
5.23
0.57
16.82
0.18
0.00
0.00
1.57
6.66
1.0
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.66
0.00
Average
740.1
10.6
92.2
5.19
0.58
17.24
0.19
0.11
0.00
1.61
11.59
1.2
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.03
—
0.00
0.02
0.24
0.72
0.00
-------
TABLE B-3. CAR 92 EMISSIONS SUMMARY 1981 OLDS DELTA 88
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
tt)
Cold Idle
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., &/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benza Idehy de
Hexanaldehyde
921
739.6
11.9
95.0
3.58
0.16
0.39
0.21
103.4
1.10
3.2
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.31
—
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
922
741.9
11.7
95.3
3.59
0.18
0.39
0.19
103.5
1.21
2.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
2.79
0.00
0.00
Average
740.8
11.8
95.2
3.59
0.17
0.39
0.20
103.5
1.16
3.0
0.00
1.25
0.00
0.16
—
0.00
0.19
1.40
0.00
0.00
921
739.6
11.9
89.9
3.39
0.17
0.39
0.19
76.0
0.56
2.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
2.33
0.00
0.00
Hot Idle
922
741.9
11.7
82.3
3.10
0.16
0.37
0.18
68.3
0.46
2.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
2.76
0.00
0.00
Average
740.8
11.8
86.1
3.25
0.17
0.38
0.19
72.1
0.51
2.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-3 (Cont'd)
CAR 92 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1981 OLDS DELTA 88
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
w
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., A/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total P articulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
921
737.4
10.1
103.7
3.91
0.26
0.49
0.20
97.5
1.75
0.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.20
0.00
922
742.4
10.7
99.4
3.76
0.24
0.48
0.17
109.5
1.75
0.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.20
0.00
Average
739.9
10.4
101.6
3.84
0.25
0.49
0.19
103.5
1.75
0.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.20
0.00
Hot Modified NYCC
921
739.6
11.9
96.7
3.65
0.15
0.38
0.19
84.1
0.84
1.2
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.26
—
0.15
0.31
0.00
0.20
0.19
922
741.9
11.7
96.4
3.61
0.14
0.36
0.19
82.2
0.89
1.9
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.27
—
0.15
0.31
0.68
0.20
0.20
Average
740.8
11.8
96.6
3.63
0.15
0.37
0.19
83.2
0.87
1.6
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.27
—
0.15
0.31
0.34
0.20
0.20
-------
TABLE B-4. CAR 93 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
CD
CO
Test Number, VVT
Barometer, nun Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., &/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
931
741.9
13.6
203.7
9.17
0.55
5.87
0.68
0.00
0.97
20.49
0.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.00
Cold Idle
932
743.5
11.9
139.2
6.38
0.55
5.46
0.46
0.00
0.60
9.27
3.5
0.00
0.16
0.20
0.00
0.23
0.47
0.95
0.92
0.59
Average
742.7
12.8
171.5
7.78
0.55
5.67
0.57
0.00
0.79
14.88
2.1
0.00
0.08
0.10
0.00
0.12
0.24
0.48
0077
0.30
931
741.9
13.6
43.7
2.18
0.46
3.74
0.08
0.00
1.05
36.92
2.7
0.62
0.15
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.21
1.21
0.32
0.00
Hot Idle
932
743.5
10.7
44.7
2.20
0.46
3.34
0.07
0.00
0.50
16.00
1.5
0.12
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.62
0.00
Average
742.7
12.2
44.2
2.19
0.46
3.54
0.08
0.00
.0.78
26.46
2.1
0.37
0.32
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.11
0.73
0.47
0.00
-------
TABLE B-4 (Cont'd).
CAR 93 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Cold Modified
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., X-/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crot onal dehy de
Isobutyraldehyde
Me thy le thy Ike tone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
931
739.6
10.5
81.7
3.65
0.24
1.72
0.17
0.00
0.34
11.48
0.8
0.25
0.18
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.00
932
738.6
9.8
85.1
3.83
.0.24
2.59
0.16
0.00
0.53
23.55
1.5
0.67
0.20
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.25
0.00
NYCC
Average
739.1
10.2
83.4
3.74
0.24
2.16
0.17
0.00
0.44
17.52
1.2
0.46
0.19
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.26
0.00
Hot Modified NYCC
931
741.9
12.6
68.7
2.96
0.06
0.21
0.15
0.00
0.23
7.24
0.7
0.30
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
932
743.5
11.6
68.3
2.93
0.05
0.29
0.15
0.00
0.07
11.10
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Average
742.7
12.1
68.5
2.95
0.06
0.25
0.15
0.00
0.15
9.17
0.4
0.15
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-5. CAR 93 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR
NO AIR INJECTION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, 9/fcg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., &/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
B Total Particulates
*_, Sulfate
° Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crot onal dehy de
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
936
739.9
11.4
179.0
10.17
1.73
34.21
0.93
0.00
1.63
11.74
5.6
1.08
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.98
1.83
0.00
Cold
937
741.7
11.9
124.7
6.94
•
1.46
21.25
0.94
0.00
4.41
13.43
4.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.22
1.53
0.00
Idle
938
744.7
11.8
181.3
10.14
1.80
32.16
1.03
0.00
4.8
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.00
2.88
1.24
0.00
Hot Idle
Average
742.1
11.7
161.7
9.08
1.66
29.21
0.97
0.00
3.02
12.59
5.1
0.54
0.23
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
2.69
1.53
0.00
936
739.9
11.4
45.1
2.29
0.50
4.48
0.08
0.00
2.36
19.10
3.6
0.38
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.82
0.64
0.00
937
741.7
11.2
42.9
2.08
0.48
2.73
0.11
0.00
1.76
10.88
3.9
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.26
0.62
0.00
938
744.7
11.8
44.7
2.34
0.52
5.45
0.10
0.00
4.3
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.14
0.63
0.00
Average
742.1
11.5
44.2
2.24
0.50
4.22
0.10
0.00
2.06
14.99
3.9
0.30
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.74
0.63
0.00
-------
TABLE B-5 (Cont'd).
CAR 93 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR
NO AIR INJECTION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
ro
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., Si/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonal dehy de
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
936
738.4
11.7
64.6
3.77
0.91
13.42
0.21
0.00
1.39
2.03
1.8
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.73
0.79
0.13
937
740.2
11.7
62.5
3.45
0.84
10.16
0.24
0.00
1.97
0.00
2.2
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.91
0.00
938
743.5
10.7
67.1
3.85
0.89
12.82
0.22
0.00
2.2
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
_ —
0.00
0.00
0.53
1.15
0.00
Average
740.7
11.4
64.7
3.69
0.88
12.13
0.22
0.00
1.68
1.02
2.1
0.26
0.05
0.00
0.00
___
0.00
0.00
0.76
0.95
0.04
Hot Modified NYCC
936
739.9
11.4
56.2
2.91
0.62
6.30
0.21
0.00
2.00
9.96
1.8
0.33
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.63
0.00
937
741.7
11.9
56.3
2.90
0.59
6.01
0.21
0.00
2.23
3.00
1.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.93
0.78
0.00
938
744.7
11.8
57.3
2.97
0.64
6.59
0.23
0.00
1.7
0.08
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.65
0.00
Average
742.1
11.7
56.6
2.93
0.62
6.30
0.22
0.00
2.12
6.48
1.7
0.14
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.79
0.69
0.00
-------
TABLE B-6. CAR 94 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1981 VW RABBIT
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., i/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
tu Total Particulates
^ Sulfate
10 Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehvde
941
742.7
12.6
59.6
2.83
0.41
3.45
0.13
0.00
0.56
22.11
3.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
2.89
0.64
0.00
Cold Idle
942
742.4
12.6
66.3
2.98
0.24
1.74
0.08
0.00
0.70
22.95
4.09
0.31
0.17
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.21
2.77
0.63
0.00
Average
742.6
12.6
63.0
2.91
0.33
2.60
0.11
0.00
0.63
22.53
3.81
0.16
0.09
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.11
2.83
0.64
0.00
941
742.7
11.9
47.7
2.04
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.46
14.95
1.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
—
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
Hot Idle
942
742.4
11.9
48.6
2.08
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.50
36.17
5.33
0.31
0.17
0.00
0.18
—
0.00
0.21
4.46
0.00
0.00
Average
742.6
11.9
48.2
2.06
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.48
25.56
3.21
0.16
0.09
0.00
0.29
—
0.00
0.11
2.58
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-6 (Cont'd).
CAR 94 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1981 VW RABBIT
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , 9/kg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., Jl/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
ro Total Particulates
jL Sulfate
w Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Prqpionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Me thy le thy Ike tone
Benza Idehyde
Hexanaldehyde
941
741.2
9.1
64.0
2.78
0.09
0.54
0.12
0.00
0.38
10.05
1.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.98
0.13
0.00
942
742.2
10.9
61.7
2.71
0.09
0.79
0.12
0.00
0.54
10.07
1.6
0.20
0.07
0.00
0.06
—
0.00
0.06
1.17
0.00
0.00
Average
741.7
10.0
62.9
2.75
0.09
0.67
0.12
0.00
0.46
10.06
1.4
0.10
0.04
0.00
0.03
—
0.00
0.03
1.08
0.07
0.00
941
743.0
10.4
55.5
2.37
0.01
0.13
0.07
0.00
0.10
8.81
0.9
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.87
0.00
0.00
Hot Modified
942
742.4
12.1
54.4
2.33
0.01
0.14
0.07
0.00
0.26
10.02
1.2
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.18
0.00
0.00
NYCC
Average
742.7
11.3
55.0
2.35
0.01
0.14
0.07
0.00
0.18
9.42
1.1
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-7. CAR 94 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1981 VW RABBIT
RICH BEST IDLE AND DISCONNECTED OXYGEN SENSOR
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
w
Test Number, VVT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., fc/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Parti cu la tes
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
MethylethyUcetone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
946
743.0
13.1
38.9
3.92
1.01
31.62
0.03
0.00
2.23
21.61
6.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
— —
0.00
0.25
6.05
0.00
0.00
Cold
947
744.0
13.1
38.6
3.91
1.05
31.69
0.03
0.00
2.88
23.44
0.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
Idle
948
744.0
11.9
42.3
4.06
0.99
31.58
0.04
0.00
2.91
10.93
0.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.00
Hot Idle
Average
743.7
12.7
39.9
3.96
1.02
31.63
0.03
0.00
2.67
18.66
2.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
—
0.05
0.08
2.02
0.31
0.00
946
743.0
12.6
27.4
3.12
0.70
27.65
0.01
0.00
4.24
15.74
6.0
1.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.21
4.12
0.00
0.00
947
744.0
13.1
27.3
3.14
0*7 A
.74
27.85
0.02
0.00
3.15
21.95
0.9
0.00
0.57
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
948
744.0
11.9
27.2
3.25
0.83
29.44
0.02
0.00
3.70
14.30
2.9
1.06
0.00
0.00
0.21
—
0.00
0.25
0.74
0.64
0.00
Average
743.7
12.5
27.3
3.17
0*7 /"
.76
28.31
0.02
0.00
3.70
17.33
3.3
0.92
0.19
0.00
0.07
—
0.00
0.15
1.62
0.32
0.00
-------
TABLE B-7 (Cont'd) . CAR 94 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1981 VW RABBIT
RICH BEST IDLE AND DISCONNECTED OXYGEN SENSOR
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
ro
M
Ul
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., H/IOO min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethy Iketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
946
741.2
10.5
39.5
3.83
0.90
29.91
0.09
0.00
4.05
9.69
1.9
0.61
0.35
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.79
0.00
947
741.4
9.3
40.0
3.90
0.90
30.87
0.08
0.00
3.32
4.62
1.5
0.45
0.18
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.60
948
742.2
10.4
40.2
3.92
0.94
30.67
0.10
0.00
3.66
11.28
3.6
1.37
0.71
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.92
0.00
Average
741.6
10.1
39.9
3.88
0.91
30.48
0.09
0.00
3.68
8.53
2.3
0.81
0.41
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.09
0.03
0.57
0.20
Hot Modified NYCC
946
743.0
15.0
33.2
3.48
0.89
29.12
0.05
0.00
4.57
7.89
1.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.19
0.52
0.00
947
744.0
13.1
33.5
3.55
0.95
29.91
0.07
0.00
3.17
10.38
0.4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
948
744.0
11.9
34.3
3.65
1.00
30.26
0.06
0.00
4.68
15.45
3.4
1.29
0.22
0.00
0.34
0.00
0.10
0.50
0.91
0.00
Average
743.7
13.3
33.7
3.56
0.95
29.76
0.06
0.00
4.14
11.24
1.8
0.43
0.07
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.03
0.56
0.61
0.00
-------
TABLE B-8. CAR 95 EMISSIONS SUMMARY 1980 BUICK CENTURY
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
w
Test Number, VVT
Barometer, nun Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., i/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
951
744.5
12.1
154.7
6.96
1.29
2.66
0.31
30.54
0.48
7.8
2.07
0.41
0.00
0.17
0.20
0.20
2.56
2.14
0.00
Cold
952
742.7
12.9
100.6
4.60
1.61
1.35
0.23
13.25
0.59
7.1
3.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.61
2.10
0.25
Idle
953
742.4
12.4
103.0
4.72
1.57
1.67
0.24
4.39
0.22
12.7
5.11
1.04
0.37
0.59
0.44
0.24
2.11
2.15
0.61
Average
743.2
12.5
119.4
5.43
1.49
1.89
0.26
16.06
0.43
9.2
3.43
0.48
0.12
0.25
0.21
0.15
2.09
2.13
0.20
951
744.5
12.3
53.5
2.33
0.31
0.03
0.01
21.66
0.64
6.5
1.40
0.26
0.38
0.39
0.44
0.21
3.13
0.00
0.31
Hot
952
742.7
12.9
58.0
2.53
0.36
0.02
0.02
6.21
0.57
2.5
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.67
0.27
0.00
Idle
953
742.7
12.1
52.5
2.29
0.36
0.02
0.02
8.30
0.26
4.3
0.40
0.71
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.24
2.11
0.27
0.31
Average
743.3
12.4
54.7
2.38
0.34
0.02
0.02
12.06
0.49
4.4
0.78
0.32
0.13
0.20
0.15
0.15
2.30
0.18
0.21
-------
TABLE B-8 (Cont'd).
CAR 95 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1980 BUICK CENTURY
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., &/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
w Total Particulates
jL Sulfate
~° Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Me thy le thy Ike tone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehvde
951
741.7
9.8
70.0
3.61
4.09
1.32
0.10
6.11
0.19
4.6
0.87
0.07
0.05
0.06
—
0.06
0.07
0.58
1.18
1.66
952
740.7
9.3
69.6
3.55
3.76
1.27
0.09
6.18
0.07
10.7
6.21
0.48
0.25
0.23
—
0.20
0.30
0.52
2.15
0.33
953
740.7
10.0
78.4
3.88
3.19
1.29
0.12
12.13
0.17
3.3
1.51
0.15
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.38
1.12
0.13
Average
740.9
9.7
72.7
3.68
3.68
1.29
0.10
8.14
0.14
6.2
2.86
0.23
0.10
0.10
—
0.09
0.12
0.49
1.48
0.71
951
744.5
11.1
72.4
3.16
0.33
0.23
0.05
3.91
0.19
1.3
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.25
Hot Modified NYCC
952
742.7
12.1
74.8
3.25
0.33
0.26
0.06
12.40
0.21
1.8
0.48
0.14
0.08
0.06
—
0.10
0.10
0.72
0.08
0.00
953
742.7
11.4
72.7
3.18
0.39
0.34
0.06
7.60
0.11
1.1
0.46
0.15
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
Average
743.3
11.5
73.3
3.20
OO C
.35
0.28
0.06
7n ^
.97
0.17
1.4
0.50
0.10
0.03
0.02
—
0.03
0.03
0.56
0.03
0.08
-------
TABLE B-9. CAR 95 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1980 BUICK CENTURY
RICH BEST IDLE AND NO AIR INJECTION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
w
M
CO
Test Number, VVT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., i/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Ftexa na 1 dehvde
956
740.4
13.1
109.3
8.12
1.35
48.73
0.10
13.57
0.36
1.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.61
0.00
Cold
957
743.0
12.1
116.4
8.28
1.37
46.57
0.11
8.76
0.34
4.3
1.27
0.76
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.66
0.57
0.00
Idle
958
745.0
12.6
115.9
8.37
1.38
48.12
0.11
10.49
0.24
1.9
0.26
0.09
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
0.99
0.57
0.00
Hot Idle
Average
742.8
12.6
113.9
8.26
1.37
47.81
0.11
10.94
0.31
2.6
0.51
0.28
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.20
0.58
0.00
956
740.7
12.9
67.4
3.71
OCT C
. 55
11.28
0.13
^^
0.53
1.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.17
0.30
0.00
957
743.0
11.6
70.3
3.76
OC f
. 56
10.25
0.15
4.22
0.25
3.5
0.81
0.45
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.69
0.58
0.00
958
745.2
11.3
69.7
3.89
Or* o
.58
12.48
0.15
6 A C
.45
0.12
1.9
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0*00
0.00
0.98
0.57
0.30
Average
743.0
11.9
69.1
3.79
0.56
11.34
0.14
5O A
. 34
0.30
2.3
0.27
0.15
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.00
1.28
0.48
0.10
-------
TABLE B-9 (Cont'd).
CAR 95 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1980 BUICK CENTURY
RICH BEST IDLE AND NO AIR INJECTION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
03
M
ID
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , 9/kg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., A/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Parti cu la tes
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
956
740.7
12.4
94.1
4.99
0.70
12.99
0.29
7.54
0.09
957
743.0
11.9
92.2
4.87
0.72
12.74
0.28
2.54
0.18
958
744.5
13,6
91.2
4.76
0.67
12.00
0.33
3.09
0.20
Average
742.7
12,6
92.5
4.87
0.70
12.58
0.30
4.39
0.16
956
740,9
13.1
88.2
4.44
0.57
8.71
0.36
0.11
Hot Modified NYCC
957
743,2
11.4
90.1
4.45
0.57
7.75
0.37
1.06
0.14
958
745.2
11.3
91.1
4.54
0,57
8.12
0.35
1.92
0.10
Average
743.1
11.9
89.8
4.48
0.57
8.19
0.36
1.49
0.12
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Me thylethyIketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
0.8
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.46
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.54
0.00
-------
TABLE B-10.
CAR 96 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1978 CHEVROLET NOVA
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
CO
to
o
Cold Idle
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, 9/kg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons. , £/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide , g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
961
743.2
12.6
147.7
8.18
1.72
24.48
0.71
0.00
1.80
25.43
4.6
0.78
0.56
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
1.43
1.85
0.00
962
743.0
12..4
145.5
8.54
3.50
27.62
0.74
0.00
2.27
11.67
5.1
1.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
__
0.24
0.00
0.82
2.24
0.00
963
744.5
12.6
139.5
8.33
3.87
27.59
0.85
0.00
3.74
3.49
2.9
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
0.27
2.13
0.00
Average
743.6
12.5
144.2
8.35
3.03
26.56
0.77
0.00
2.60
13.53
4.2
1.02
0.19
0.00
0.00
«_
0.08
0.00
0.84
2.07
0.00
961
743.2
11.9
54.3
2.38
0.40
0.05
0.04
0.00
0.49
21.01
3.2
0.55
0.57
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
1.45
0.63
0.00
Hot Idle
962
743.0
12.4
65.9
2.87
0.40
0.09
0.05
0.00
0.34
18.36
1.4
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
0.74
0.30
0.00
Average
743.1
12.2
60.1
2.63
0.40
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.42
19.69
2.3
0.43
0.29
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.47
0.00
-------
TABLE B-10 (Cont'd).
CAR 96 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1978 CHEVROLET NOVA
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons. , J./100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehvde
961
742.4
10.9
92.1
4.48
0.92
5.91
0.22
0.00
0.56
5.08
2.5
0.85
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.45
1.04
0.00
Cold Modified NYCC
962
740.7
10.9
87.5
4.18
1.31
3.68
0.22
0.00
0.32
9.20
2.1
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
1.43
0.00
Average
741.6
10.9
89.8
4.33
1.12
4.80
0.22
0.00
0.44
7.14
2.3
0.78
0.09
0.00
0.00
o.oo'
0.00
0.34
1.24
0.00
961
743.5
12.4
77.9
3.37
0.39
0.12
0.11
0.00
0.17
3.02
1.3
0.65
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.26
0.00
Hot Modified NYCC
962
743.2
12.9
77.1
3.35
0.39
0.15
0.12
0.00
0.16
11.29
1.7
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.53
0.00
Average
743.4
12.7
77.5
3.36
0.39
0.14
0.12
0.00
0.17
7.16
1.5
0.61
0.02
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.40
0.00
-------
TABLE B-ll. CAR 96 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1978 CHEVROLET NOVA
RICHER IDLE
Emission Rate, rog/min (Except as Noted)
Test Number, VVT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
fuel Cons., i/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
^ Sulfate
10 Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Cold Idle
966
741.2
11.9
147.7
8.14
1.75
23.91
0.86
0.00
2.47
0.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.59
0.00
0.00
Hot Idle
Average 966 Average
741.2
11.4
71.7
3.10
0.27
0.07
0.08
0.00
0.65
18.52
0.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.63
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-ll (Cont'd).
CAR 96 EMISSIONS SUMMARY - 1978 CHVEROLET NOVA
Richer Idle
Emission Rate, mg/min (Except as Noted)
W
Cold Modified NYCC
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Carbon Dioxide, g/min
Fuel Cons., £/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/min
Carbon Monoxide, g/min
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/min
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Me thy lethy Iketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
966
738.6
11.0
96.0
4.53
0.77
4.98
0.30
0.00
0.70
12.94
2.7
1.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
__
OoOO
0.00
0.30
1.18
0.00
967
740.7
1209
99.9
4.75
0.74
5.48
0.38
0.00
0.94
4.6
1.88
0.12
0.00
0.00
__
0.10
0.10
0.59
1.67
0.12
Average
739.7
12.0
98.0
4.64
0.76
5.23
0.34
OoOO
0.82
12.94
3.7
1.53
0.06
0.00
0.00
__
0.05
0.05
0.45
1.43
0.06
966
740.9
11.7
85.5
3.70
0.26
0.13
0.16
0.00
0.36
2.53
1.0
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.39
0.00
Hot Modified NYCC
967
743.7
12.4
88.2
3.81
0.27
0.27
0.21
0.00
0.47
6.22
2.9
1.30
0.12
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.91
0.00
Average
742.3
12.1
86.9
3.76
0.27
0.20
0.19
0.00
0.42
4.38
2.0
0.80
0.06
0.00
0.00
__
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.65
0.00
-------
APPENDIX C
INDIVIDUAL MODIFIED NYCC TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
Emissions Listed in Grains per Kilometer or
Milligrams per Kilometer
Fuel Consumption Listed in Liters per
100 Kilometers
-------
TABLE C-l. CAR 91 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1970 FORD FAIRLANE
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
n
i
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
VlOO min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) ,
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Ace taldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Modified Cold
911
98.6
12.3
232.0
3.0
343
0
0
5
53
8
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
912
85.6
6.5
54.3
3.5
244
0
0
3
59
28
15
3
0
1
0
1
0
7
0
NYCC
Average
92.1
9.4
143.2
3.3
294
0
0
4
56
18
8
2
0
1
0
1
0
7
0
911
77.1
4.7
18.2
3.8
300
0
0
2
56
35
13
1
1
1
2
3
<1
12
1
Modified Hot
912
71.5
4.1
16.5
3.3
179
0
0
0
45
35
18
2
0
1
0
1
5
7
0
NYCC
Average
74.3
4.4
17.4
3.6
240
0
0
1
51
35
16
2
1
1
1
2
3
10
1
-------
TABLE C-2. CAR 91 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1970 FORD FAIRLANE
RICH BEST IDLE
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen,
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
n
w Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Ace t al de hy de
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Ben z aIdehyde
Hexanaldehyde
916
92.4
11.4
350.7
2.8
2
0
29
229
54
21
3
0
1
2
2
9
16
0
Modified Cold
917
86.3
14.7
235.9
2.6
0
0
35
191
62
39
5
0
0
0
0
4
14
0
NYCC
Average
89.4
13.1
293.3
2.7
1
0
32
210
58
30
4
0
1
1
1
7
15
0
916
78.3
8.8
268.2
2.8
3
0
25
251
23
3
1
0
1
0
<1
5
12
0
Modified Hot
917
80.6
8.8
259.1
2.8
0
0
24
103
15
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
10
0
NYCC
Average
79.5
8.8
263.7
2.8
2
0
25
177
19
2
2
0
1
<1
4
4
11
0
-------
TABLE C-3. CAR 92 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1981 OLDS DELTA 88
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Modified Cold NYCC
Test Number,
Fuel Cons. ,
WT
VlOO min
921
61.3
922
57.5
Average
59.4
Modified Hot
921
53.9
922
54.0
NYCC
Average
54.0
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, gAm
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Other Emissions
n
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrelein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
4.1
7.6
3.2
1531
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
3
0
3.7
7.3
2.7
1655
26
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
3
0
3.9
7.5
3.0
1593
27
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
0
2.3
5.6
2.9
1241
12
18
0
0
2
4
2
5
0
3
3
2.2
5.4
2.9
1228
13
29
0
0
2
4
2
5
10
3
3
2.3
5.5
2.9
1235
13
24
0
0
2
4
2
5
5
3
3
-------
TABLE C-4. CAR 93 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
o
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) ,
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
MethylethyIketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
931
54.4
3.6
25.7
2.5
0
5
171
11
4
3
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
Modified Cold
932
57.2
3.5
38.6
2.3
0
8
352
22
10
3
1
0
0
1
3
4
0
NYCC
Average
55.8
3.6
32.2
2.4
0
7
262
17
7
3
1
1
0
1
2
4
0
931
45.7
0.9
3.2
2.3
0
4
112
10
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Modified Hot
932
44.1
0.7
4.3
2.2
0
1
167
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NYCC
Average
44.
0.
3.
2.
0
3
140
5
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
8
8
3
-------
TABLE C-5. CAR 93 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR
NO AIR INJECTION
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
JL/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen,
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Modified Cold NYCC
936
57.1
13.8
203.2
3.1
0
21
31
27
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
12
2
937
50.4
12.3
148.3
3.6
0
29
0
32
4
0
0
0
0
0
15
13
0
938
59.5
13.8
198.0
3.4
0
34
8
0
0
0
0
0
8
18
0
Average
55.7
13.3
183.2
3.4
0
25
16
31
4
1
0
0
0
0
11
14
1
Modified
936
42.5
9.0
92.2
3.0
0
29
145
26
5
3
0
0
0
0
8
9
0
937
45.0
9.2
93.6
3.2
0
33
44
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
11
0
Hot NYCC
938
44.6
9.6
98.7
3.4
0
25
1
1
0
0
0
0
13
10
0
Average
44.0
9.3
94.8
3.2
0
31
95
25
2
1
0
0
0
0
12
10
0
-------
TABLE C-6. CAR 94 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1981 VW RABBIT
BASELINE CONFIGURATION
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
n
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
V100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
MethylethyIketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Modified Cold
941
42.3
1.4
8.2
1.8
0
6
153
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
2
0
942
41.4
1.4
12.1
1.8
0
8
154
24
3
1
0
1
0
1
18
0
0
NYCC
Average
41.9
1.4
10.2
1.8
0
7
154
21
2
1
0
1
0
1
17
1
0
941
35.2
0.2
1.9
1.0
0
2
134
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
Modified Hot
942
35.9
0.2
2.2
0.9
0
4
155
19
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
NYCC
Average
35.6
0.2
2.1
1.0
0
3
145
16
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
-------
TABLE C-7. CAR 94 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1981 VW RABBIT
RICH BEST IDLE AND DISCONNECTED OXYGEN SENSOR
Emission Rate, ing/km (Except as Noted)
Modified Cold NYCC
Test Number, WT
Fuel Cons., Si/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
946
57.6
13.6
449.9
1.3
947
60.9
14.0
482.4
1.2
948
58.9
14.2
461.4
1.5
Average
59.1
13.9
464.6
1.3
946
52.3
13.3
438.0
0.8
Modified
947
52.8
14.1
444.4
1.1
Hot NYCC
948
52.9
14.5
438.7
0.9
Average
52.7
14.0
440.4
0.9
o
CD
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
MethylethyUcetone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
0
62
149
29
0
52
72
23
55
170
53
0
56
130
35
69
119
26
47
154
6
68
224
49
61
166
27
9
5
0
1
7
3
0
3
21
11
0
5
12
6
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
3
0
5
6
1
0
2
0
1
0
12
0
0
0
2
0
9
0
3
0
14
0
0
1
1
9
3
0
0
18
8
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
1
7
13
0
0
<;L
8
9
0
-------
TABLE C-8. CAR 95 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1980 BUICK CENTURY
BASELINE
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
o
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes
& Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Modified Cold NYCC
951
54.3
61.1
19.7
1.5
92
3
952
52.7
55.6
18.8
1.4
92
1
953
56.9
47.0
18.9
1.7
178
2
Average
54.6
54.6
19.1
1.5
121
2
951
48.1
5.1
3.5
0.8
60
3
Modified
952
48.2
5.0
3.9
0.9
184
3
Hot NYCC
953
47.3
5.8
5.1
0.9
113
2
Average
47.9
5.3
4.2
0.9
119
3
69
1
1
9
18
25
158
3
4
8
32
5
48
92
13
1
1
1
92
7
4
3
22
2
0
0
42
3
2
1
0
0
6
16
2
1
2
8
22
11
19
27
0
0
7
0
4
1
1
11
1
1
16
0
0
7
0
0
21
8
0
0
0
7
2
1
1
7
2
0
0
7
1
<1
<1
10
<1
2
-------
TABLE C-9. CAR 95 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1980 BUICK CENTURY
RICH BEST IDLE AND NO AIR INJECTION
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
n
Modified Cold NYCC
Test Number, WT
Fuel Cons. , A/100 min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
956
75.0
10.5
195.4
4.3
957
73.2
10.8
122.7
4.2
958
71.7
10.0
180.4
4.9
Average
73.3
10.4
166.2
4.5
956
66.7
8.6
130.8
5.5
Modified
957
67.8
8.6
118.0
5.6
Hot NYCC
958
67.3
8.5
120.5
5.3
Average
74.0
8.6
123.1
5.5
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
113
1
12
0
0
6
6
0
38
3
28
0
0
8
13
0
46
3
29
0
0
6
20
0
66
2
23
0
0
7
13
0
20
0
0
4
6
0
16
2
27
0
0
7
9
0
28
1
19
0
0
6
9
0
22
2
22
0
0
0
0
5
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
10
0
0
0
9
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
8
<1
0
0
0
0
6
8
0
-------
TABLE C-10.
CAR 96 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1978 CHEVROLET NOVA
BASELINE
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
o
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
VlOO min
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , gAm
Carbon Monoxide, gAm
Oxides of Nitrogen,
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Modified Cold
961
66.4
13.8
88.2
3.3
0
8
75
37
13
3
0
0
0
0
7
15
0
962
61.4
19.3
54.4
3.3
0
5
135
32
11
0
0
0
0
0
3
21
0
NYCC
Average
63.9
16.6
71.3
3.3
0
7
105
35
12
2
0
0
0
0
5
18
0
961
50.7
5.8
1.8
1.7
0
3
45
19
10
1
0
0
0
0
5
4
0
Modified Hot
962
49.7
5.7
2.2
1.8
0
2
168
25
8
0
0
5
0
0
3
8
0
NYCC
Average
50.2
5.8
2.0
1.8
0
3
107
22
9
1
0
3
0
0
4
6
0
-------
TABLE C-l..
CAR 96 EMISSION SUMMARY - 1978 CHEVROLET NOVA
RICHER IDLE
Emission Rate, ing/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Fuel Cons.,
WT
a/100 min
o
i
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Other Emissions
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Hydrogen Sulfide
Cyanide
Ammonia
Aldehdyes & Ketones
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Aerolein
Propionaldehyde
Acetone
Crotonaldehyde
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Modified Cold
966
67.2
11.5
73.7
4.5
0
10
192
39
17
0
0
0
0
0
4
18
0
977
69.7
10.9
80.7
5.7
0
14 .
—
67
28
2
0
0
1
1
9
25
2
NYCC
Average
68.5
11.2
77.2
5.1
0
12
192
53
23
1
0
0
1
1
7
22
1
Modified Hot
966
56.3
3.9
2.0
2.5
0
5
38
15
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
0
967
55.1
3.8
3.9
3.1
0
7
90
42
19
2
0
0
0
0
9
13
0
NYCC
Average
55.7
3.9
3.0
2.8
0
6
64
29
12
1
0
0
0
0
7
10
0
-------
APPENDIX D
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE REGULATED
EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS
-------
TABLE D-l. TEST NO. 911 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IDLE . VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 911 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.« L(302. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.87 MM HGI29.05 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OES. C(OES. ft
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
MC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RAH6E/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
Ore, KET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 3/24/12
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG CI7S.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.0 GM/KG
C-ID
774.7 (30.3)
769.« (30.3)
44.4 (112.0)
24094.
44.4 I 1569.)
3«.4/ 3/ 384.
1.4/ 3/ 14.
80.3/ 2/4581.
.I/ 2/ 4.
68.II 3/ 1.24
2.6/ 3/ .04
40.7/ 2/ 41.
1.6/ 2/ 2.
7.82
372.
4377.
1.20
39.3
9.52
226.36
978. S
3.48
300.
.872 ( .834)
1.000 I .968)
44.4
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000 IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 Kw( 12 0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-516-F
OOOMETE KM(67S94. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUM IDI TY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS. G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
911
737.9
12.0
23.9
195.7
11.63
1.91
43.2B
.70
H-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -FAIRLANE BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 'HI RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 (.(302. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.87 MM HGI29.03 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RAMGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, KET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 9/24/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(73.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.7 GM/KG
H-ID
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
24096.
44.3 ( IS7I.)
60.8/ 2/ 61.
13.4/ 2/ IS.
39.7/I3/ 37.
1.6/I3/ I.
36.2/ 3/ .61
2.6/ 3/ .04
3.3/ 2/ 6.
I.4/ 2/ 1.
21.64
46.
54.
.37
4.2
1.23
2.79
464.0
.38
300.
.934 I .933)
1.000 ( .973)
44.3
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW< 12 0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-516-F '
ODOMETER KM(67J94. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER ,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE ,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS,
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/ MTN
L/IOoH
G/MIN
G/MIN
6/MIN
911
737.9
12.7
23.9
92.8
4.03
.23
.36
.08
D-2
-------
TABLE D-l (Cont'd). TEST NO. 911 EMISSION RESULTS
•iti.C
rauai: EMISSION:, RESULTS
PROJECT OS-461'? 004
FAIRLANE BASELINE
rr^T NO. 911 RUN
VEHICLE MODFI. 70 CORD
CMC INC 4.9 L<302. CUD V 0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 7.75.SB KM !IG(2G.9i IN HO
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
DAG RESULTf.
TEST CYCLE
RI nuFR tar r tin. H20UN. n?o>
INI FT P MM. H2QIIN. ICO)
CLOUER INLET TEMP. BEG. CUiEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU CTB. CU. METRES(GCF)
IIC SAMPLE METER/RANBE/PPM
IIC BCKGRB METER/RANCE/PPM
ro SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO 5CKGRD ICTCR/RANGF/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANljl /PCT
C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCI
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
MOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
IIC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION f'PM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MAGS CRAMS
f02 MASS
NflX MA^I
RUN TIME
urc
r>
(IRAM!!
SECONDS
UET (DRY)
I4ET (DRY)
UQL (SCM)
CAM ILK (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST MUMSER.
MROMFTFR, HM UC
HUMIDITYr G/KG
TEMPERATURE, ICC C
CARBON DinxlDL. G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION- L/100KM
IIYfiRQCARfiONS, U/XN
CARBON MONOXIDE, C/t.H
OX I DCS OF NITROGEN. G/KM
VEKlClt NO.'M
ICAFF s/:4/o.
DAG CART NO. 1
DYN'O NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 BEC C175.0 BEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.3 GM/KG
C NY
-'74.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42,0 (109.0)
57944.
106.7 ( 3760.)
17.S/ II 175.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
42.6/ 3/1507.
.!/ 3/ 2.
40.5/ Z/ .04
2.0/ 3/ .04
12.0/ 2/ 13.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
13.20
164.
1531.
.no
11.0
10.09
190.24
1560.4
3.45
722.
,?25 ( .'70,')
1.000 < .9/3)
106.7
0.00
.02
911
735.6
11.3
:'3.9
1905.7
90.59
12.32
232.00
2.7?
TCfll UEICliT 1014. KG( 4000. LP3)
ACTtlAl MAU. LiIAIi c.9 KU< ir.rt ;|p)
GAMLIWE EM-516-F
ODDrtETCli ttttt* MK6MU2. nllCCi
MOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
G/Hin
L/100 HIM
G/HIN
G/MIH
G/NIN
129.7
6.72
0.84
15.81
0.20
H-NVCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE BASELINE
PROJECT OJ-6619-004
TEST MO. 911 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 LI302. CID) v-»
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.62 MM HGU9.04 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF f MM. H20(IN. HZO)
BLOVER INLET P MM. H2CHIN. HZO)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC aCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 5/24/82
BAO CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
OKI BULB TEMP. 24.4 OE6 CI76.0 OC8 ft
ABS. HUMIDITY II.j 6M/K6
H-NY
774.7 1)0.3)
774.7 (30.S)
42.6 (109.0)
5(316.
107.7 < 3(04.)
70.5/ 2/ 71.
I3.0/ II 13.
34.I/12/ 116.
1.0/12/ 2.
42.I/ )/ .72
2.4/ 3/ .04
IS.O/ 2/ U.
1.3/ 2/ 1.
18.23
5«.
I II.
.68
13.8
3.62
IS. 86
1345.6
2.94
728.
.945 ( .927)
1.000 ( .974)
107.7
0.00
.76
7JI.6
11.7
24.4
1761.7
77.0)
4.73
18.17
3.84
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KMI 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-516-F
ODOMETER KM(67594. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
G/M1N
L/100MIN.
G/HIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
110.9
4.83
0.30
1.14
0.24
D-3
-------
TABLE D-2. TEST NO. 912 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST wo. 712 RUN i
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FQRB FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.7 L<302. CUD V 3
TRANSMISSION A3
RARFIMFTER 736.35 MM !IG<27.01 IN IIG)
PFI AT1VF HUMIDITY 56. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
DLCUER DIF P MH. II20UN. 1120)
BLOWER INLET f MM. K20(IN. K20)
DLOWER INLET TEMP. BEG. ClBEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STB. CU. METRES(SCF)
IIC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/rPM
CO BCXCRD METER/RANGC/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRB HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
MOX BCKCRB METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
IIC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
IIC MAES GRAMS
m MASS fiRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY I
VOL ISCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
ij IDLE VEI/ICI.C EMISSIONS RESULTS
PMJLCI 05 6617 004
VEHICLE Nil.71
BATF 3/25/02
BAG CART NO. 1
BYNO NO. 3
CVS HO. 2
BRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 BEG CI76.0 BEG F)
ADS. HUMIDITY 11,0 CM/KG
C IB
747.1 (30.2)
7<57.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
24037.
44.4 ( 1546.)
40.4/ 3/ 404.
1.3/ 3/ 15.
az,2/ 2/4055.
.!/ 2/ 4.
49.0/ Z/ 1.24
2.3/ 3/ .04
41.O/ ?/ 42.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
7.66
371.
4647.
1.21
40.0
10.00
240.07
700.0
3.47
279.
.067 ( .054)
t.OOO < .771)
44.4
0.00
FAIRLANE BASELINE
TEST UEICIIT 1014. KG' 4000. Lie')
ACTUAL ROAD LOAB 0.7 KUi 12.0 11C-1
GASOLINE EM-516-F
TtP ****»» ,\h((,7iO;. rtlLFS)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
TEST NUMDER,
BAROMETER i
TEMPERATURE.
r.MdiOH MQXIDr,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM IIG
G/.1C
DEC C
G/KM
L/100MIN
lirdROCAIiftONS. G/MIN
CARKON MONOXIDE. C/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. C/N]N
912
736.7
tl.O
•r
1.99
47.87
0.70
TEST NO. 712 RUN 1
'.TillCLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANC
ENGINE 4.? L(302. CIO) V 0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 736.G5 MM 110(27.01 IN KG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 56. PCI
DAG RF.EULTC
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. II20(IN. !I20)
BLOWER INLET P MH. K20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. BEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLCU STD. CU. NErREC(CCD
IIC SAMPLE METER/RANCE/CI'M
IIC BCKGRD MtTER/RAHGE/PfM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO DCKCRB MCTCR/RANGC/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD MCTCR/RANCC/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKCRD MCTCR/RAN1
SAM BLR (SCM)
I Ml. '.'CHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJII.) OS 4617 004
VEHICLE NO.71
DATE 5/25/02
BAG CART NO. 1
BrNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 BEG C<76.0 DEC F)
ADS. HUMIDITY 11.0 GM/KO
H ID
767.1 (30.2)
767.1 (30,2)
43.3 (110.0)
24043.
44.4 ( 1367.)
iO.5/ 2/ 61.
13.O/ 2/ 14.
Al.ll/13/ 57.
2.1/l.V 2.
36.5-' '.',/ .61
2.4/ 3/ .04
S.4/ 2/ 5.
,0/ 2/ 1.
21.44
47.
56;
4.6
1.21
2.00
467.1)
.40
300.
.953 ( .736)
l.OCO ( .776)
44.4
0.00
FAIRLANE BASELINE
TEST WEIGHT 1314. KG( 4000. LITC)
ACTUA1 ROAD LOAB 0.7 ,\u< r.n HP,
UAOOMNE EM-516-F
OBOMETER «**«» ,\.1(/l/i02. SlLEUi
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
TEST NUrtSER,
BAROMETER, nM 1,'G
HUMIDITY, C/K(i
TEMPERATURE. BEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIBCS OF NITROGEN. G/MIN
712
736.7
11. 0
24.4
74.0
4.00
.50
.00
D-4
-------
TABLE D-2 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 912 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 912 IVIIN i
VEHICLE MODEL ?o FORD FAIRLANL:
ENGINE 4.9 L(302. CID) V-3
TRANCMIGGION A3
BAROMETER 736.05 MM HGC7.01 IN IIG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 54. PCT
DAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER BIF P MM. H20(IN. 1120)
BLOUER INLET P MM. K20UN. H20)
BLOUCR INLET TEMP. DEC. CtOEG. F)
DLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO'J STD. CU. METREGOT)
IIC CAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANfiE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/'RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
NOX DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PI'M
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
IIC MASS GRAMS
CO MAGS CRAMS
C02 MAGC GRAMG
NOX MACS CRAMS
RUN TIME r.ECONBG
DFC. UET (DRY!
f>Cr, UCT (DRY)
VOI (SCM)
GAM DLR (GCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBERi
DAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FIJEI CONSUMPTION,
(1M MG
[j/KG
DEC C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARDON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
(111 I. VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJCI'.I 05 ,1417 004
VEHICLE NU.91
DATL" 5/25/02
DAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVC NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEC C(76.0 DEC F)
ADS. HUMIDITY 11.0 CM/hC
C-NY
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
57991 .
104.9 ( 3775.)
FAIRLANE BASELINE
TEST WEIGHT 1014.
ACTUA1 ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-516-F
ODOMETER ****** KMU7/.02.
KC( -1000, LKi
1). 9 C,U( 12.0 IIP)
MILES)
WOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
2/
13. A/ 2/
90.
14.
14. 2/ 3/ 371.
,03
.04
14.
40.0,' 3/
2.4/ 3/
14.4/ 2/
.5/ 2/ 1.
15,33
OS.
354.
.77
13.7
5.24
44.31
1547.2
2,00
723.
.735 ( ,718)
1.000 ( .774)
106.7
0.00
.[12
912
734.7
11.0
24.4
1S77.7
05.41
4.45
54.34
3.53
G/MIN
L/100 HIM
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
128.6
5.83
0.44
3.68
0.24
TFST NO. 71 2 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 TCRD FAIR-LAN!'
ENGINE 4.7 LI302. CID) V 0
TRANSMISSION A3
riARdMFTFR 7.14.05 MM Mli(27.01 IN HG)
RFI ATIVE HIIMTDITY 54. PCT
SAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
DLOUER DIF p MM. 1120(IN, 1120)
DLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20>
DLOUER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(DCG. F)
DLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU CTD. CU. METRCS(GCF)
IIC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
IIC DCKGRD METER/RANGE.TPM
CD SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO ECKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
IIC CONCCMTHATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
IIC MASS GRAMS
TO MASR rRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, UET (DRY)
GCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
KH (MEASURED)
TEST NUMDCR,
DAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARDON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM IIG
0/\0
PEC C
G/KM
I/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS* G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
i! NYCC VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 05 4419 004
VEHICLE NJ.VI
DAtt 5/25/0?
DAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEC CI74.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.0 fi«/KC
H-NY
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30,5)
43.3 (110.0)
57954.
104.0 ( 3772.)
45.5/ 2/ 44.
12.3/ 2/ 12.
52.7/12/ 113.
•9/12/ 2.
42.0/ V .72
2.5,' 3/ .04
13.,V 2/ 14.
.11 2/ 1.
113.27
54.
100.
.4U
13.0
3.32
13.37
1327.Q
2.49
723.
.'M5 ( .720)
1.000 ( .975)
104.0
0.00
.01
912
7.J4.7
11.0
24.4
1435.3
71.44
4.07
14.47
3.31
FAIRLANE BASELINE
TEST UEICIIT 1014. l>Gi 4000. LOG)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD O.T M'< 1:',0 IIP)
GAf,[i:.m EH-S16-F
QDa-.E.Er.' ****** f;M(4/iO... ,i[LLGi
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR l.Ol
D-5
G/MIN
L/100MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
110.2
4.80
0.28
1.11
0.22
-------
TABLE D-3. TEST NO. 916 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 916 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 1(302. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.19 MM HG(29.22 IN H6>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 63. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOHER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
SLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. OEO. C(OEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOM STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC 8CKSRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO M£TEH/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS ORAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, MET (0X1 >
SCF, MET
-------
TABLE D-3 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 916 EMISSION RESULTS
C-MTCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST MO. 916 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 L1302. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER Dlf P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20MN. H20)
SLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCf)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
VC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
VEHICLE NO. 91
DATE 5/18/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 OEG CI77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.7 GM/KG
C-NY
774.7 (JO. 5)
774.7 (30. J)
43.3 (110.0)
57749.
107.3 ( 3790.)
16. J/ 3/ 163.
1.7/ 3/ 17.
84. 5/ 3/2323.
,4/ 3/ 9.
40. 5/ 3/ .69
3.2/ 3/ .05
II. S/ 2/ 12.
.6/ 2/ I.
14.43
147.
2245.
.64
10.9
9.11
2B0.52
1260.6
2.24
720.
.931 ( .913)
1.000 ( .977)
107.3
0.00
.80
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG! 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD S.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM- 516- F
ODOMETER 10661. KM( 6749. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
6/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
TEST NO. 916 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORO FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 L<302. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A)
BAROMETER 740.16 MM HG(29.I4 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
>C BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
742.4
10.7
25.0
1576.6
92.37
II. J9
35§:,6?
G/NIN
L/100 HIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
105.1
6.16
0.76
23.38
0.19
H-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE V18/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25).0 DEG C(77.0 OEG ft
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.7 ON/KG
H-NY
812.6 (32.0)
7*7.4 (31.0)
42.2 (101.0)
57717.
106.1 ( 3772.)
12. V 3/ 125.
1.3/ 3/ IS.
68.O/ 3/1757.
,2/ 3/ S.
33.I/ S/ .59
2.2/ 3/ .0)
12.J/ 2/ 12.
1.5/ 2/ 2.
17.36
113.
1704.
.36
10.9
6.95
211.66
1067.4
2.22
720.
.942 I .926)
1.000 I .976)
106.6
0.00
.79
916
740.2
10.7
25.0
1362.5
76.27
a.83
268.20
2.63
TEST WEIGHT IBM. KGI 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 6.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM- 516- F
ODOMETER 10661. KM( 6749. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
90.6
5.15
0.58
17.66
0.19
D-7
-------
TABLE D-4. TEST NO. 917 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 917 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 1002. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A]
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HGC29.13 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY JO. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CTCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(D€G. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
1C SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
1C 8CKGRD METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
1C CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. MET IDRT)
SCF. VET (DRV)
VOL (SCMI
SAM 8LR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 3/20/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.6 OEG CI78.0 DEG F>
ASS. HUMIDITY 10.3 GM/KO
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS )
'-' "" "•' »>
-
ODOMETER ...... KM (6 7538. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .99
.73
.03
7.
I.
774.7 (30.3)
767.1 <30.2>
43.9 (III.O)
24080.
44.6 ( 1374.)
24.8/ 3/ 248.
I.6/ 3/ 16.
76.O/ 3/2021.
.2/ 3/ 3.
44.O/ 3/
3.2/ 3/
7.2/ 2/
I.2/ 2/
13.77
233.
1933.
.71
6.1
3.99
101.30
377.3
.32
300.
.927 ( .912)
1.000 ( .977)
44.6
0.00
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
8/KG
OEG C
G/HIN
(./too MIN
HYDROCARBONS, G/HIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
TEST NO. 91 7 RUN ]
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 1(302. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 7J9.40 MM HG(29.I5 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 90. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIOEG. Fl
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
1C SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, «ET (DRV)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
917
739.9
10.3
23.6
113.3
6.43
1.20
20.30
.10
H-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 3/20/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 29.6 DCG C(78.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.3 GM/KG
H-IO
779.8 (30.7)
767.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
24063.
44.6 I 1373.)
12.2/ 3/ 122.
!.«/ 3/ 16.
61.i/ 3/1738.
.I/ 3/ 2.
30.S/ 3/ .30
3.2/ 3/ .09
4.1/ 2/ 4.
I.O/ 2/ I.
19.33
107.
1691.
.46
3.2
2.73
87.81
J74.0
.27
500.
.949 ( .934)
1.000 I .979)
44.6
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ODOMETER •«•••• KM(67338. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .99
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER ,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE .
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS,
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/XG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/i4oM!N
G/MIN
G/UTIJ
_ .pun
MIN
917
7J9.9
10.3
29.6
74.8
4.49
.99
17.37
.09
D-8
-------
TABLE D-4 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 917 EMISSION RESULTS
C-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 91 7 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 1(302. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.36 MM H6I29.03 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIOITY 54. PCT
SAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H2CMIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEQ. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANOE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, *ET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIOITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HM MG
S/KG
DEG C
6/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 26.7 DCS CtSO.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.3 SM/K6
C-NY
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.J)
43.3 (I 10.0)
37793.
106.6 ( 3763.)
20.I/ 3/ 201.
t.3/ S/ 13.
61.«/ 3/1)33.
.I/ 2/ 4.
40.8/ 3/ .69
3.0/ 3/ .05
10.4/ 2/ 10.
.8/ 2/ I.
15.32
189.
1302.
.63
11.61
186.3B
1266.1
2.08
721.
.936 ( .919)
1.000 ( .976)
106.6
0.00
.79
917
737.4
12.3
26.7
1604.0
86.26
14.68
235.92
GASOLINE
ODOMETER
14. KG( 4000, LBS)
D 8.9 KW( (2.0 H
6-F
KM(673JO. MILES)
NOX HUMIOITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/HIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
105.5
5.67
0.97
15.51
0.17
H - NYCC - VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -
PROJECT 05-6619-004
FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
TEST NO. 917 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 U302. CIO) v-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HGI29.I3 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRANS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, KET (DBY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR
-------
TABLE D-5. TEST NO. 921 EMISSION RESULTS
<--IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLDS DELTA BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 921 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS OELTA88
ENGINE 5.7 L(350. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A)
BAROMETER 739.6} MM H6I29.I2 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIOITV 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OES. CIOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PPM
THE BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/29/12
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C(7J.O OEO f)
ABS. HUMIOITV 11.9 GM/KG
C-ID
865.6 (34.0)
•63.6 (34.0)
41.1 (106.0)
2961.
69.7 ( 2462.)
26.9/1 I/ 27.
7.7/ I/ I.
29.3/13/ 27.
2.2/I3/ 2.
25.6/ 3/ .42
3.I/ 3/ .03
S.S/ 2/ 9.
I.O/ 2/ 1.
31.63
19.
24.
.37
7.3
.78
1.97
474.9
1.03
300.
.96* ( .949)
1.000 I .976)
69.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1928. KG( 42SO. LBS>
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD a.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-329-F
ODOMETER S9296. KM(36843. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/IOOMIN
G/MIN
G/MIN.
0/MIN
921
739.6
11.9
23.9
95.0
3.38
.16
.39
.21
H-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLDS DELTA BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 921 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLOS DELTA88
ENGINE 3.7 1(550. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 7J9.65 MM HG(29.I2 IN KG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES/SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKSRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/29/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DCS C(7S.O OEG F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
H-IO
914.4 (36.0)
889.0 (33.0)
37.8 (100.0)
2963.
70.0 ( 2471.)
28.0/1 I/ 28.
7.7/ I/ 8.
28.2/I3/ 26.
I.5/13/ 1.
24.2/ 5/ .39
2.9/ 3/ .04
7.6/ 2/ 8.
.9/ 2/ 1.
33.58
21.
24.
.33
6.7
.83
1.94
449.3
.94
300.
.970 ( .931)
1.000 I .976)
70.0
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1928. K6( 4230. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP>
DIESEL EM-329-F
ODOMETER 39301. KM(36648. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIOITV,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/M I N
l/loo M1N
G/MIN
G/MIN
S/MIN
921
739.6
11.9
23.9
89.9
3.39
.17
.39
.19
D-10
-------
TABLE D-5 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 921 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 921 HUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS DELTA88
ENGINE 5.7 L(350. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.36 MM HG129.03 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 54. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLONER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOMER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OE6. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. NET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
C-NYCC- VEHICLE
PROJECT 03-1
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/29/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEC C(74.0 OE6 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KG
C-NY
914.4 (36.0)
119.0 (39.0)
32.2 < 90.0)
7079.
169.4 ( 5981.)
39.9/1 I/ 40.
8.3/ I/ S.
41.6/13/ 39.
9.6/I3/ 9.
26.»/ 3/ .44
2.7/ 3/ .04
8.6/ 2/ 9.
I.O/ 2/ 1.
29.99
32.
30.
.40
7.6
3.12
9.13
1237.a
2.42
716.
.967 ( .930)
1.000 ( .978)
169.4
0.00
.76
921
737.4
10.1
23.3
1623.6
61.32
4.09
7.64
5.18
'OLDS DELTA BASELINE
TEST HEIGHT 1928. KG( 4290. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KM( 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-329-F
ODOMETER 99314. KM(56856. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .98
G/MIN
L/100 HIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
103.7
3.91
0.26
0.49
0.20
M NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLDS DELTA BASELINE
TEST NO. 921 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS OELTABB
ENGINE 5.7 L(550. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.69 MM HGI29.12 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOMER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOMER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DE6. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOM STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/HANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, MET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/29/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OC6 C(73.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GN/K6
H NY
914.4 (36.0)
889.0 (39.0)
38.9 (102.0)
7083.
166.7 ( 5888.)
26.8/1 I/ 27.
8.I/ I/ 8.
27.4/13/ 23.
1.2/13/ I.
25.7/ 3/ .42
2.8/ 3/ .04
7.9/ 2/ B.
I.O/ 2/ 1.
31.34
19.
23.
.38
6.9
1.83
4.34
1139.0
2.30
717.
.968 ( .949)
1.000 ( .976)
166.7
0.00
.81
921
739.6
11.9
23.9
1433.4
33.91
2.27
3.63
2.86
TEST MEIGHT 1928. KG I 4230. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KM( 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-329-F
OOONETER 39308. KM(36832. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
96.7
3.65
0.15
0.38
0.19
D-ll
-------
TABLE D-6. TEST NO. 922 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLDS DELTA BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 922 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS DELTA 88
ENGINE 3.7 L(330. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A]
BAROMETER 741.9) MM HG(29.21 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CtCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
H0« SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO NETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOK CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS DRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DE6 CI76.0 OEG F>
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.7 GM/KG
C-ID
914.4 (J6.0)
889.0 (33.0)
37.« (100.0)
29*4.
70.3 ( 2483.)
29.3/11/ 30.
7.0/ I/ 7.
2».2/l)/ 27.
2.8/13/ 3.
2S.4/ 3/ .41
3.0/ 3/ .03
».»/ 2/ ».
I.7/ 2/ 2.
31.90
23.
24.
.37
6.9
.92
1.94
476.5
.9»
300.
.969 ( .930)
1.000 ( .977)
70.)
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1928. KG( 4230. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW< 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-329-F
ODOMETER 99314. KMU6896. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/IOO MIN
G/MIN
8'MIN
922
741.9
11.7
24.4
9J.3
3.99
.18
.39
.19
H-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLDS DELTA BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 922 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS DELTA 88
ENGINE 5.7 L(390. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.9) MM HG(29.2I IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 99. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLONER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLONER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(OEQ. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCXGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCMI
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEO CC76.0 OEG F>
ABS. HUMIDITY It.7 GM/KG
H-IO
914.4 (36.0)
889.0 (33.0)
40.6 (103.0)
2964.
69.7 ( 2460.)
27.VI1/ 27.
7.0/ I/ 7.
27.6/13/ 23.
2.I/13/ 2.
22.4/ 3/ .36
2.7/ 3/ .04
7.)/ 2/ 7.
.9/ 2/ 1.
36.43
21.
23.
.32
6.4
.82
1.83
411.4
.88
300.
.973 ( .994)
1.000 ( .978)
69.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1928. K8( 4250. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-329-F
ODOMETER 39320. KM(34860. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/IOO MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/HIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/i
MIN
922
741.9
H.7
24.4
•2.3
3.10
.16
.37
.18
D-12
-------
TABLE D-6 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 922 EMISSION RESULTS
C-NYCC-
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLOS DELTA BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 922 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS DELTA
ENGINE 5.7 LU50. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
aa
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HGI29.2J IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 58. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
8LOMER OIF P MM. H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CD. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RAN6E/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 OEG CI74.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.7 GM/KS
C-NY
«I4.4 (36.0)
889.0 (33.0)
43.3 (110.0)
7093.
164.3 ( 3«37.)
37.2/11/ J7.
6.S/ I/ 7.
34.7/I3/ 32.
1.6/13/ 1.
27.O/ I/ .44
3.I/ 3/ .03
7.7/ 2/ 8.
I.I/ 2/ 1.
29.82
31.
30.
.40
6.6
2.95
'.74
1200.7
2.10
725.
.966 ( .948)
1.000 ( .977)
163.3
0.00
.79
TEST WEIGHT 1926. KG( 4250. UBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-329-F
ODOMETER 99330. KM(36866. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
TEST NO. 922 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 81 OLDS DELTA 88
ENGINE 5.7 1(350. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.93 MM HGI29.21 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
922
742.4
10.7
23.3
1521.3
37.45
3.74
'.27
2.66
G/M1N
L/100 HIN
G/MIN
G/HIH
G/MIN
99.4
3.76
0.24
0.48
0.17
H-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - OLOS DELTA BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.92
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART MO. 1
OYNO MO. 2
CVS NO. 17
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DE6 C(76.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.7 ON/KG
H-MY
914.4 (36.0)
869.0 (33.0)
40.0 (104.0)
7092.
167.0 ( 5897.)
25.7/11/ 26.
6.0/ I/ a.
26.6/13/ 24.
1.6/13/ 1.
25.II 3/ .42
2.9/ 3/ .04
7.6/ 2/ a.
.6/ 2/ 1.
31.55
22.
.36
7.0
1.73
4.34
1132.2
2.31
717.
.968 ( .930)
1.000 ( .977)
167.0
0.00
.80
922
741.9
11.7
24.4
1436.1
33.99
2.15
3.41
2.88
TEST WEIGHT 1928. KG( 4230. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KWI 11.3 HP)
DIESEL EM-529-F
ODOMETER 39327. KM(36864. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/HIII
G/MIN
G/MIN
96.4
3.61
0.14
0.36
0.19
D-13
-------
TABLE D-7. TEST NO. 931 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 931 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 5.3 LI200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.93 MM HG(29,21 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 74. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLONCR OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE MCTER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO aCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
MOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, NET (DRY)
SCF, VET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/24/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 OES 0(74.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.6 GM/KG
C-IO
782.3 (30.8)
784.9 (30.9)
43.3 (110.0)
24298.
43. I ( 1992.)
II.9/ 3/ 119.
I.3/ 3/ 13.
29.7/ 3/ 996.
.11 3/ 9.
71.O/ J/ 1.2»
3.1/ 3/ .09
36.»/ 2/ 37.
I.I/ 2/ I.
9.90
107.
963.
1.24
39.8
2.79
29.97
1029.4
3.42
302.
.899 ( .878)
1.000 ( .964)
4S.I
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1388. KG( 3900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KM( 10 7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3I8-F
ODOMETER 11308. KM( 7191. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR I.II
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
NM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/min
L/toomin
HYDROCARBONS, (THCI G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
931
741.9
13.6
9.17
0.55
5.87
0.68
H-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 931 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 1(200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.93 MM HGI29.2I IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 74. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCXGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/24/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DE8 CI74.0 DE8 Fl
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.6 8M/KG
H-IO
774.7 (3O.9)
774.7 (30.3)
42.8 (109.0)
24034.
44.8 ( 1981.)
10.2/ 3/ 102.
I.4/ 3/ 14.
81.2/1 I/ 371.
.6/1 I/ 2.
19.2/ 3/ .31
2.8/ 3/ .04
4.9/ 2/ 3.
,9/ 2/ I.
37.82
88.
339.
.27
4.0
2.28
18.69
218.4
.38
300.
.974 ( .990)
1.000 I .973)
44.8
0.00
TEST HEIGHT 1388. KG( 3900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
8ASOUNE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 11313. KM( 7139. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.11
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C.
G/min
1/100 nun
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
931
741.9
13.6
23.3
43.7
2.18
.46
3.74
.08
D-14
-------
TABLE D-7 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 931 EMISSION RESULTS
C-MYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 9)1 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 82 NERCURY ZEPHYR
EN6INE 3.3 1(200. CIO) 1-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.6} MM HGI29.I2 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 55. PCT
BA8 RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. HJOI
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DE6. CCDEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANSE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANSE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANSE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OfC, WET (ORY1
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM NG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIOES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/24/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO, )
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEO C(75.0 DE6 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.3 ON/KG
TEST WEIGHT 1384. KG( 3300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 Kw( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EN-Sta-F
ODOMETER 11326. KM! 7142. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .99
.34
.04
II.
782.3 (30.S)
772.2 (30.4)
42.2 (108.0)
98747.
109.2 I 3836.)
63.3/ 2/ »3.
18.I/ 2/ 18.
78.2/I2/ 164.
7.4/12/ 14.
32.4/ 3/
2.7/ 3/
II.I/ 2/
1.2/ 2/ 1.
23.01
46.
163.
.30
10.0
2.89
21.00
997.6
2.06
733.
.936 < .941)
1.000 ( .977)
109.2
0.00
.62
931
739.6
10.3
23.)
1222.6
34.39
G/min
L/100min
2.33 a/Bin
81.7
3. 65
0.17
H-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPMYR BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 931 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 LI200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.93 MM HGI29.2I IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BA6 RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEC C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/24/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(73.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GH/K6
H-NY
784.9 (30.9)
774.7 (30.3)
42.2 (106.0)
37773.
107.7 ( 3603.)
26.6/ 2/ 27.
16.2/ II 16.
23.6/13/ 22.
I.2/13/ I.
26.2/ 3/ .46
3.0/ 3/ .05
9.I/ 2/ 9.
.9/ 2/ I.
26.60
II.
20.
.42
6.2
.66
2.31
827.0
1.81
722.
.963 ( .944)
1.000 ( .974)
107.7
0.00
.76
931
741.9
12.6
23.9
1063.7 G/min 68.7
43.73 L/lOOmin 2.96
.68 G/min 0.06
3.23 G/min 0.21
2.J3 C/min 0.15
D-15
TEST WEIGHT 1368. KG( 3300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 6.0 Kw( 10.7 HP)
SASOLINE EN-316-F
ODOMETER 11316. KM( 7136. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
-------
TABLE D-8. TEST NO. 932 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 932 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 5.3 L(200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HO(29.27 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. M20(IN. H20)
BLOMCR INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
SLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO NETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANSE/PPM
CO BCKGRO NETER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/HANGE/PCT
C02 BCK6RD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGftD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS ORAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. NET (ORY>
SCF. MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAN BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/25/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEO C(7S.O OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
C-IO
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
44.4 (112.0)
24080.
44.* ( 1583.)
II.7/ 3/ 117.
I.2/ 3/ 12.
23.«/ 3/ 346.
.I/ 3/ 2.
J0.7/ 3/ .8*
2.3/ 3/ .04
26.»/ 2/ 27.
1.0/ 2/ I.
14.18
106.
323.
.83
26.0
2.74
27.31
695.9
2.31
300.
.929 ( .911)
1.000 ( .972)
44.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1388. KG( 3300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KH( 10 7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 0. KM( 0. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/min
L/IOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC I G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN.
932
743.3
11.9
23.9
139.2
6.38
.35
3.46
.46
H-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. »32 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 L(200. CID) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 38. PCT
SAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
8LOWER INLET P MM. H20MN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (OMY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCN)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/25/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 OES C(74.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.7 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT ISB8. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KH( 0 7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3I6-F
ODOMETER 0. KM( 0. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
.31
.04
3.
I.
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.3)
43.3 (110.0)
24066.
44.9 ( 1583.)
10.3/ 3/ 103.
I.4/ 3/ 14.
75.3/1 I/ 329.
.3/1I/ I.
19.I/ 3/
2.3/ 3/
5.4/ 2/
I.I/ 2/
38.42
• 9.
320.
.27
4.3
2.31
16.71
223.6
.37
300.
.974 ( .996)
1.000 ( .978)
44.9
0.00
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
S/KG
OEG 5
G/nin
L/IOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/nun
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/min
932
743.3
10.7
23.3
44.7
2.20
.46
3.34
.07
D-16
-------
TABLE D-8 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 932 EMISSION RESULTS
C-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST MO. 932 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 LI200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 738.63 MM HGI29.08 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 91. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOVER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20>
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OES. M
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
TtC SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPM
THC 8CKGHO METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKQRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. MET (DRY)
SCF, WET <0«Y)
VOL ISCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
6/KM
L/100KM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/2S/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
OKI BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG CC79.0 DCS F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.8 GM/KG
C-NY
7*7.4 131.0)
7S2.3 (30.8)
36.» (102.0)
S7494.
107.2 ( 37B4.)
ST.I/ 2/ 97.
II.7/ 2/ 12.
64.I/1I/ 299.
I.3/1I/ 4.
34.0/ 3/ .97
3.3/ 3/ .09
10.5/ 2/ M.
I.I/ 2/ I.
22.39
46.
249.
.52
9.4
2.14
31.02
lois.a
I.(I
7H.
.95? ( .939)
I.000 ( .978)
107.2
0.00
.80
932
738.6
9.8
"•' /
1268.7 G/min
37.22 I./lOOmin
TEST HEIGHT 1588. KG( 3900. LBS>
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 K»( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 11949. KN{ 7)74. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .97
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
3.33 G/«lin
38.62 G/min
2.34 G/min
85.1
3.83
0.24
2.59
0.16
H-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 932 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 L(200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HGI29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20>
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
SLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX 6CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRANS
NOX MASS GRANS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, NET (CRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (TtC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/23/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 14.4 DCS C(76.0 DCS F)
ABS. HUMIDITY II,• ON/K8
H-HY
787.4 (31.0)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
37744.
107.6 ( 3601.)
27.9/ 2/ 2*.
19.3/ 2/ 20.
32.0/I3/ 29.
I.3/I3/ 1.
27.6/ 3/ .4)
2.3/ S/ .04
9.S/ 2/ 9.
I.I/ It 1.
29.21
9.
28.
.42
8.2
.36
3.49
820.3
1.79
721.
.966 ( .947)
1.000 ( .977)
107.6
0.00
.80
932
743.9
11.6
24.4
1023.2 G/min 68.3
44.06 L/100»in 2.93
.70 G/min 0.05
4.31 G/min 0.29
2.18 G/min 0.15
TEST WEIGHT 19*8. KG( 3900. LBSI
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 12814. KM( 7962. MILES)
MX HUMIDITY CORRECT I Ott FACTOR 1.03
D-17
-------
TABLE D-9. TEST NO. 936 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-OO4
TEST NO. 936 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 92 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 5.3 1(200. CID) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HG(29.I3 IN MO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAO RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
SLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OE6. ODES. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METCR/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/29/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.1 DE6 C(74.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.4 SM/K8
C-ID
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
41.1 (106.0)
24022.
44.B ( I»B3.)
35.0/ 3/ 330.
I.B/ 3/ IB.
66.I/ 2/3422.
.I/ 2/ 4.
63.2/ 3/ 1.13
2.7/ 3/ .04
53.4/ 2/ 33.
.»/ 2/ 1.
9.00
334.
3276.
1.0*
52.7
8.64
171.01
894.9
4.63
300.
.869 ( .871)
1.000 ( .970)
44.8
0.00
TEST HEIGHT IS88. KG( 3300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KN( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
OOOMETE8 11360. KM< 7183. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (TIC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN.
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/min
L/lQOmin
G/min
936
739.9
11.4
23.3
179.0
10.17
1.73
34.21
.93
H-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 936 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL «2 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 LI200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HG(29.I3 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THE SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKQRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO. 93
DATE 6/29/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
OUT BULB TEMP. 23.3 OC6 C(74.0 DEfl F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.4 ON /KG
H-IO
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
41.1 (106.0)
24031.
44.9 ( 1564.)
M.I/ 3/ Ml.
!.»/ 3/ 13.
90. I/I I/ 442.
.7/M/ 2.
19. 6/ 3/ .31
2.7/ 3/ .04
S.S/ 2/ 6.
.7/ 2/ I.
36.31
96.
'.8
2.49
22.40
225.6
.42
300.
.972 ( .953)
1.000 ( .977)
44.9
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1SB6. KG( 3300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3IB-F
ODOMETER 11363. KM( 7185. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR |.02
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
6/nun
L/lOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (TtC ) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, Q/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
936
739.9
H.4
23.3
43.1
2.29
.30
4.46
.06
D-18
-------
TABLE D-9 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 936 EMISSION RESULTS
C-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-4619-004
TEST NO. 9)6 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENOINE 3.3 LI200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A)
BAROMETER 738.38 MM HOI29.07 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
SLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OE6. CIOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
T>C SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THE 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
COJ SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GO*MS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIOITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/29/82
BAG CART MO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 OEG C(76.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIOITY 11.7 GM/KG
C-NY
'74.7 (30.S)
774.7
-------
TABLE D-10. TEST NO. 937 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 937 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURr ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 L(200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.6* MM HG(29.20 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLONER INLET P MM. H2O(IN. H2O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OE6. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, NET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCH)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C(75.0 OE6 F>
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
C-IO
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.1)
43.3 (110.0)
240)3.
44.6 ( 1974.)
29.9X 3/ 299.
I.7/ 3/ 17.
79.0/ 3/2125.
.I/ 3/ 2.
46.6/ 3/ .80
2.7/ J/ .04
53.6/ 2/ 54.
.8/ 21 I.
12.92
283.
2047.
.76
52.9
7.28
106.22
623.3
4.69
300.
.923 { .904)
1.000 ( .972)
44.6
0.00
TEST HEIGHT 1588. KS( 3500. IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-SI8-F .'•"•!
ODOMETER 0. KM( 0. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG q
G/min
L/min
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARSON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
937
741.7
11.9
23.9
124,7
6.94
1.46
21.25
.94
H-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 937 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 LI200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.66 MM HG(29.20 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3«. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOMER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART NO. t
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C(75.0 OE6 F>
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG
H-IO
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
24003.
44.6 ( 1575.)
10.9/ 3/ 109.
I.7/ 3/ 17.
66.5/1I/ 273.
I.4/1I/ 4.
18.8/ 3/ .30
2.6/ 3/ .04
7.0/ 2/ 7.
.7/ 2/ 1.
39.54
92.
263.
.26
6.3
2.38
13.64
214.4
.53
300.
.973 ( .956)
1.000 ( .978)
44.6
0.00
TEST HEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500 IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE
ODOMETER
EH-5I8-F
0. KM(
0. MILES)
NOX NUHIOITY CORRECTION FACTOR |.02
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG Q
G/min
L/lOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, 0/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
937
741.7
11.2
23.9
42.9
2.08
.48
2.73
.11
D-20
-------
TABLE D-10 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 937 EMISSION RESULTS
C-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 937 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 5.3 LI200. CIO) U-«
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.16 MM HGI29.14 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER Olf P MM. H2CHIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. fl
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO aCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 6CKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS SHAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KN
VEHICLE HO.95
DATE 6/30/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 OEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11,7 CM/KG
C-NY
787.4
-------
TABLE D-ll. TEST NO. 938 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6614-004
TEST NO. 938 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 82 NERCURYZE PHYR
ENGINE 3.3 LI200. CIO) 1-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.73 MM HGI29.32 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H2CMIN, H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CCOEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF>
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO! SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO NETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS DRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, NET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 7/ 1/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C(75.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY II.» GM/K6
C-IO
7B7.4 (31.0)
7B7.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
24093.
44.9 ( 1386.)
36.7/ 3/ 367.
2.I/ 3/ 21.
63.2/ 2/3214.
.I/ 2/ 4.
64.0/ V t.!4
3.0/ 3/ .09
99.3/ 2/ 99.
2.0/ 2/ 2.
9.Ot
348.
3073.
I.10
97.9
9.02
160.79
906.2
9.13
300.
.889 ( .871)
1.0OO ( .969)
44.9
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1988. KG( 3900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-91B-F
ODOMETER 11999. KM( 7209. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/min
L/IOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) O/ mm
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
TEST NO. 938 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 L(200. CID) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.73 MM HG(29.32 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20MN. H2O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
938
744.7
11.8
23.9
181.3
10.14
1.80
32.16
1.03
H-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
3/nun
L/IOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 7/ I/B2
SAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C(79.0 DCS F)
ABS. HUMIDITY II.• GM/K6
H-IO
7B7.4 (31.0)
781.4 (31.0)
42.2 (108.0)
24092.
49.0 ( 1589.)
II.6/ 3/ 116.
I.7/ 3/ 17.
23.3/ 3/ 938.
.2/ 3/ 3.
19.2/ S/ .31
2.J/ 3/ .04
7.7/ 2/ 8.
I.9/ 2/ 2.
36.01
99.
320.
.27
9.9
2.98
27.24
223.2
.92
JOO.
.972 ( .933)
1.000 ( .977)
49.0
0.00
9.00
938
744.7
11.8
23.9
44.7
2.34
.92
3.49
.10
D-22
TEST WEIGHT 19B8. KG( 3900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 8.0 KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EN-5I8-F
ODOMETER 11602. KM( 7209. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
-------
TABLE D-ll (Cont'd). TEST NO. 938 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 938 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 82 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 1(200. CIO) L-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HGI29.27 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 58. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF r MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET f MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CtOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCK6RD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC > G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
C-HYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 09-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE II 1/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRV BULB TEMP. 23.3 OEG C<74.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.7 GM/KG
C-NY
787.4 (31.0)
767.4 (31.0)
41.7 (107.0)
S6002.
108.2 ( 3*22. >
I*. I/ 3/ 191.
2.0/ 3/ 20.
31. «/ 5/1262.
.I/ V 2.
27. I/ J/ .44
2.5/ 3/ .04
14. 2/ 2/ 14.
1.4/ 2/ I.
22.86
172.
122).
.41
12.9
10.73
134.43
808.2
2.66
723.
.956 I .938)
1.000 ( .977)
108.2
0.00
.78
938
743. S
10.7
\m'.t
39.49
13.77
197.99
3.41
ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
TEST WEIGHT 1388. KG( 39OO. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 11611. KM( 7219. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
G/min
L/100min
G/min
G/min
G/min
67.1
3.8S
0.89
12.82
0.22
H-NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ZEPHYR MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 938 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 12 MERCURY ZEPHYR
ENGINE 3.3 U200. CID) L06
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.73 MM HG(29.32 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS 6RAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SON)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 7/ I/B2
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEO CI73.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.8 ON/KG
H-NY
787.4 (31.0)
787.4 (31.0)
39.4 (103.0)
97734.
108.4 < 3827.)
14.O/ 3/ 140.
I.7/ 3/ 17.
27.8/ 3/ 647.
.I/ 3/ 2.
23.B/ 3/ .19
2.7/ J/ .04
14.I/ 2/ 14.
1.4/ 2/ 1.
28.90
124.
627.
.33
12.7
7.72
79.13
688.4
2.74
721.
.963 ( .946)
1.000 ( .976)
108.4
0.00
.80
TEST WEIGHT I3BB. KG< 3900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-918-F
ODOMETER 11607. KN< 7212. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
938
744.7
11.8
23.9
89B.8
44.98
9.64
98.73
3.42
G/min
L/lOOmin
G/min
G/min
G/min
D-23
57.3
2.97
0.64
6.59
0.23
-------
TABLE D-12. TEST NO. 941 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6*19-004
TEST NO. 941 RUN
VEHICLE NOOEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 1(105. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. 0£8. CCOEfl. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RAMGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. VET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCH)
SAN BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO. 94
DATE 7/21/62
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEO C(7S.O DE6 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GN/K6
C-IOLE
774.7 <30.3)
774.7 (30. »)
43.3 (110.0)
24079.
44. 9 ( 1581.)
93. «/ II 94.
14. II 2/ IS.
77. 7/1 1/ 346.
t.7/11/ 9.
29. I/ 3/ .41
3.!/ 3/ .05
a. a/ 2/ 9.
I.5/ 2/ 2.
29.63
80.
331.
2.06
17.26
298.0
.67
500.
.966 ( .946)
1.000 ( .979)
44.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 5.7 KV( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EN-918-F
ODOMETER 16136. KM(10039. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
O /KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS. (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
941
742.7
12.6
23.9
59.6
2.83
.41
3.49
.13
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-O04
TEST HO. 941 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 V* RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 UI05. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HGI29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
TIC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
MOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
MOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/21/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OC« C(7i.O OE8 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 ON/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.5)
37.8 (100.0)
24019.
49.1 ( 1394.)
16.3/ 2/ 16.
19.B/ 2/ 16.
3.4/13/ 3.
4.0/13/ 4.
20.9/ 3/ .31
2.a/ 3/ .04
3.0/ 2/ 3.
1.2/ II \.
40.33
I.
1.
.29
1.8
.02
.07
238.3
.16
300.
.979 ( .996)
1.000 ( .977)
43.1
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 16163. KM(10043. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FJKCTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS. (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
941
742.7
11.9
23.9
47.7
2.04
.00
.01
.03
D-24
-------
TABLE D-12 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 941 EMISSION RESULTS
CNYCC - VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 941 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL It VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 L(103. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.17 MM HG(29.18 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 4S. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCXGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS SHAMS
CO MASS GRANS
C02 MASS SRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
8/KG
OEG C
GAM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/21/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
MY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DE6 CI75.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.1 GM/KG
CNYCC
774.7 (30.S)
774.7 (30.3)
42.2 MOB.O)
57812.
107.3 ( 3793.)
33.O/ 2/ 33.
17.6/ 2/ 18.
70.6/13/ 69.
18.0/I3/ 16.
27.6/ S/ .43
4.2/ 3/ .06
S.8/ 2/ 9.
I.S/ 2/ 2.
28.92
18.
52.
.39
7.4
1.12
6.43
769.0
1.43
721.
.963 < .931)
1.000 ( .9*0)
107.3
0.00
.79
941
741.2
9.1
23.9
974.4 G/MIN
«».» L/100MIN
'.«< G/MIN
8.18 G/MIN
'.62 G/MIN
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KOI 25OO. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 16176. KMdOOSI. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .95
64.0
2.78
8.09
.54
0.12
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 941 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 L(105. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.93 MM HGI29.25 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. Fl
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCXGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/10OKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) S/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, S/KM
OXIDES Of NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/21/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OC6 0(73.0 0€S F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 10.4 8M/KS
HNYCC
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.5)
40.6 (103.0)
37B1B.
10B.1 I 3B17.)
16.7/ 2/ 17.
14.7/ 2/ 15.
17.0/13/ 13.
3.J/13/ 3.
23.2/ V .38
2.6/ )/ .04
3.0/ 2/ 3.
I.I/ 2/ 1.
35.30
2.
12.
.34
3.9
.13
1.54
666.5
.81
723.
.972 ( .934)
1.000 ( .979)
IOB.1
0.00
.•1
941
743.0
10.4
23.9
821.2 G/MIN 55.5
33.20 L/100MIN 2.37
.19 G/MIN 0.01
1.»9 G/MIN 0.13
••• G/MIN 0.07
D-25
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EN-31*-f
ODOMETER 16167. KM(10046. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY COMKTION FACTOR .99
-------
TABLE D-13. TEST NO. 942 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST HO. 942 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 V» RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 L(IOS. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/22/82
BAG CART NO. 1
01 HO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST HEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 5.7 KH< 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 16188. KMU0099. MILES)
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOHER OIF P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOHER INLET P MM. H2CXIN. H20)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. OE6. CIDEG. ft
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES ISCF)
THE SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCXGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, HET (DRY)
SCF, HET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG CC73.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (JO.3)
774.7
-------
TABLE D-13 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 942 EMISSION RESULTS
C NTCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 942 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 LCIOi. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.19 MM HGC29.22 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 56. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/22/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OVNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 OEG C(76.0 OEG ft
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.9 GM/KG
C NYCC
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
97894.
107.7 ( 3802.)
32.8/ 2/ 33.
IS.I/ 2/ IS.
81.6/1V 81.
3.6/13/ 3.
29.8/ 3/ .42
3.0/ 3/ .05
8.0/ 2/ 8.
I.3/ 2/ I.
30.97
18.
76.
.38
6.7
1.13
9.JO
743.4
1.40
723.
.968 ( .990)
1.000 ( .978)
107.7
0.00
.79
942
742.2
10.9
946! I G/NIN 61.7
«1.39 L/100KM 2-71
1.44 G/MIN 0.09
12.09 G/MIN 0.79
1.78 G/MIN 0.12
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KW{ 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-SIS-F
ODOMETER 16209. KM(10072. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 942 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL *t VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 1(105. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 60. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C<0£G. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/22/82
BAB CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 29.0 DEG C(77.0 OE8 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 <30.9»
43.3 (110.0)
97812.
107.9 ( 3794.)
17,O/ 2/ 17.
13.i/ 2/ 16.
17.9/13/ 16.
2.1/I3/ 2.
23.I/ 3/ .37
2.8/ 3/ .04
4.7/ 2/ 9.
1.9/ 2/ 2.
35.49
2.
14.
.33
3.2
.12
1.76
699.2
.70
722.
.972 ( .993)
1.000 ( .977)
107.5
0.00
.78
942
742.4
12.1
25.0
837.5 G/MIN 54.4
35.92 L/10OMJN 2.33
.13 G/M.IN 0.01
2.24 G/MIN 0.14
.89 G/MIN 0.07
D-27
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KWI 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 16200. KM(10066. MILES)
MOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
-------
TABLE D-14. TEST NO. 946 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 946 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 LU09. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.9) MM NG(29.29 IN HOI
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 67. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H2O)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCOCO. ft
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METCR/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/23/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG CI76.0 DE6 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 (30.9)
43.3 (110.0)
24049.
44.7 I 1979.)
21.I/ 3/ 211.
I.9/ 3/ 19.
61.9/ 2/3123.
.I/ 2/ 4.
I 7.»/ 3/ .28
J.2/ J/ .09
2.9/ 2/ 3.
1.3/ II 1.
21.99
197.
3039.
.24
1.7
9.07
198.07
194.7
.19
300.
.999 I .934)
1.000 ( .976)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3I8-F
ODOMETER 16216. KMIIOO76. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.09
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/HIN
L/100MIN
Q/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
946
743.0
13.1
24.4
38.9
3.92
1 .01
31.62
.03
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RSUOTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6«19-004
TEST NO. 946 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 LII05. CIDI L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.99 MM HGI29.29
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P
BLOWER INLET P
H20IIN. H20)
H20IIN. H20I
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGND METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/23/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRV BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEC C(79.0 DCS F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.« GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 (30.9)
42.2 (108.0)
23990.
44.7 ( 1379.)
13.I/ 3/ 131.
I.6/ 3/ 16.
95.2/ 3/2740.
.11 3/ 16.
I3.3/ 3/ .21
2.9/ 3/ .04
I.8/ 2/ 2.
I.I/ 2/ 1.
27.24
136.
2635.
.17
.7
3.90
138.23
136.8
.07
300.
.963 ( .943)
I.000 ( .977)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 5.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-918-F
ODOMETER 16222. KM(10080. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
6/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, S/MIN
946
743.0
12.6
23.9
27.4
3.12
.70
27.63
.01
D-28
-------
TABLE D-14 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 946 EMISSION RESULTS
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 946 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 91 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 1(105. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.17 MM H6129.IB IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 39. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20HN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
SLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. ClOEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE MCTER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METEH/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (ORT)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM H8
GAS
DEG C
G/KM
I/100 KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/23/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(7».0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.9 GM/KG
C NYCC
78>.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.?)
42.8 (109.0)
97874.
107.4 ( 3793.)
18.7/ 3/ 187.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
59.4/ 2/2953.
.11 2/ 7.
I7.7/ 3/ .28
2.8/ 3/ .04
6.3/ 2/ 6.
I-3/ 2/ I.
22.71
175.
2878.
.24
3.1
10.81
3)9.91
47*.7
1.03
722.
.996 ( .939)
1.000 ( .980)
107.4
0.00
.80
946
741.2
10.3
996!» G/MIN 39.5
97.37 L/100MIN 3.83
13.36 G/MIN 0.90
449.89 G/MIN 29.91
>•» G/MIN 0.09
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG! 2300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 16233. KM(10087. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.99
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 946 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 1(105. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.93 MM HGI29.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 78. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKSRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/23/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG CC79.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 19.0 ON/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 (30.91
42.8 (109.0)
97774.
107.6 ( 3798.)
18.8/ 3/ 188.
I.6/ 3/ 16.
98.9/ 3/2893.
.9/ 3/ II.
19.2/ 3/ .24
2.6/ 3/ .04
3.6/ 2/ 4.
1.I/ 2/ I.
24.78
173.
2798.
.20
2.9
10.71
530.}7
399.8
.61
722.
.960 ( .9331
1.000 ( .973)
107.6
0.00
.80
946
743.0
13.0
23.9
497.9 G/MIN
52.32 L/100MIN
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 25OO. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 16227. KM(10083. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.16
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
13.34 G/MIN
437.06 G/MIN
. 76 G/MIN
33.2
3.48
0.89
29.12
0.05
D-29
-------
TABLE D-15. TEST NO. 947 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 947 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE I.7 LI105. CIO) 1-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.97 MM HOI29.29 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 67. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM.
BLOWER INLET P I
H20UN. H20I
H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET IORY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/26/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DE6 CI76.0 DEO F>
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 GM/K6
C IDLE
787.4 (31.0)
7B7.4 (31.0)
42.2 (108.0)
24048.
44.8 ( 1382.)
21.7/ J/ 217.
I .5/ 3/ 15.
62.I/ 2/3137.
.5/ 2/ 18.
17.2/ 3/ .27
2.7/ 3/ .04
2.3/ 2/ 2.
.(,/ 2/ I.
22.28
203.
3036.
.24
I .7
5.24
158.40
192.8
.16
300.
.955 ( .935)
1.000 I .976)
44.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 5.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 16246. KM(10093. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.09
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/10044IN
G/MIN
0/MIN
G/MIN
947
744.0
13.1
24.4
38.6
3.91
1 .05
31.69
.03
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 947 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE I•' LII05. CID) L-4
TRANSMI SSI ON A3
BAROMETER 743.97 MM HGI29.29 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 67. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20MN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDES. F!
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/OANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (ORY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.94
OATE 7/26/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
ORY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 OM/KC
H IDLE
787.4 (31.0)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
24020.
44.7 ( 1577.)
16.O/ 3/ 160.
I.*/ 3/ 16.
56.6/ 2/2768.
.6/ 21 21.
13.3/ 3/ .21
2.9/ 3/ .04
I.5/ 2/ 2.
.6/ 2/ I.
27.04
145.
2678.
.17
.9
3.72
139.23
136.7
.09
300.
.963 ( .942)
1.000 ( .977)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 5.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-51B-F
ODOMETER 16253. KM(10099. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.09
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/lOOMIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
947
744.0
13.1
24.4
27.3
3.14
.74
27.83
.02
D-30
-------
TABLE D-15 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 947 EMISSION RESULTS
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 947 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 LU05. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.4} MM HG(29.I9 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(0€S. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL ISCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, ITHC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, S/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/26/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.5 ON/KG
C NYCC
782.3 (30.8)
787.4 (11.0)
42.2 (108.0)
57729.
107.2 ( 3784.)
18.7/ 3/ 187.
I.3/ 3/ 13.
61.O/ 2/3061.
.3/ 2/ 18.
18.0/ 3/ .29
2.9/ 3/ .04
5.7/ 2/ 6.
I.I/ 2/ 1.
22.11
175.
2977.
.29
4.6
10.79
371.43
481.7
.91
722.
.955 ( .939)
1.000 ( .981)
107.2
0.00
.77
947
741.4
9.3
23.3
625.0 G/MIN 40.0
60.90 L/100MIN 3.90
14.00 G/MIN 0.90
482.40 G/MIN 30.87
1.18 G/MIN 0.08
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 5.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 16266. KM(10107. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .96
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 947 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 91 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 L(I09. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.97 MM HGI29.29 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 67. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. M20IIN. H2O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. GOES. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
002 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCXGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
002 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/26/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 KG C(76.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 GM/K6
H NYCC
787.4 (31.0)
787.4 (31.0)
40.0 (104.0)
57739.
108.0 ( 3814.)
19.8/ 3/ 198.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
59.4/ 2/2953.
.4/ 2/ 14.
15.5/ 3/ .25
2.9/ 3/ .04
4.5/ II 5.
.(,/ 2/ 1.
24.21
184.
2862.
.20
3.9
11.44
359.94
402.6
.88
722.
.959 I .938)
1.000 ( .976)
108.0
0.00
.81
947
744.0
13.1
24.4
495.5
52.76
14.07
444.37
1.08
TEST WEIGHT 1134. K0( 2500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 16259. KM(10103. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.09
G/MIN 33.5
L/100MIN 3.55
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
0.95
29.91
0.07
D-31
-------
TABLE D-16. TEST NO. 948 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 948 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 61 VW RABBIT
ENOINE I.7 L(I09. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A]
BAROMETER 743.97 MM HGI29.29 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
SLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/27/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEW. 23.9 OCG CC79.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 (30.9)
42.B 1109.0)
24012.
44.8 < 1581.)
20.2/ 3/ 202.
I.I/ 3/ II.
61.6/ 2/3102.
.I/ 2/ 4.
18.6/ 3/ .30
2.»/ 3/ .04
3.I/ II 3.
.8/ 2/ I.
21.60
192.
3019.
.26
2.3
4.99
197.38
210.8
.21
299.
.994 ( .934)
1.000 I .977)
44.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2900. L8S)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 9.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-9I8-F
ODOMETER 16279. KMI10113. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER.
SAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
TEST NO. 948 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE I .7 LU09. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.97 MM HG(29.29 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. M20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL ISCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
948
744.0
11.9
23.9
42.3
4.06
.99
31.58
.04
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/27/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C(79.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 130.»>
774.7 (30.9)
42.2 (108.0)
24019.
44.8 I 1383.)
17.3/ 3/ 173.
I.2/ 3/ 12.
58.9/ 2/2893.
.I/ 2/ 4.
13.I/ 3/ .21
2.8/ 3/ .04
1.8/ 2/ 2.
.9/ 2/ I.
26.47
161.
2820.
.17
.9
4.17
147.19
139.8
.08
300.
.962 I .943)
1.000 I .978)
44.8
0.00
9.00
948
744.0
11 .9
23.9
27.2
3.23
.63
29.44
.02
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 2300. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.7 KW< 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-918-F
ODOMETER 16283. KMllOltS. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
D-32
-------
TABLE D-16 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 948 EMISSION RESULTS
C MYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -RABBIT MALFUNCTION
PROJECT 09-661«-004
TEST NO. 948 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VM RABBIT
ENGINE 1.7 LI105. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.19 MM HGI29.22 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 55. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER Oir f MM. H20IIN. H2O)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(OES. F>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, S/KM
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/27/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRV BULB TEMP. 2J.9 OE8 0(75.0 DCS F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.4 «M/KO
C NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.2 (108.0)
37854.
107.7 ( 3803.)
19.4/ 3/ 194.
I.2/ 3/ IJ.
60.4/ 2/3020.
•2/ 2/ 7.
17.9/ 3/ .29
2.8/ 3/ .04
6.5/ 2/ 7.
•9/ 2/ 1.
22.31
183.
2943.
.23
5.6
11.34
369.09
483.7
1.13
722.
.955 ( .938)
1.000 ( .980)
107.7
0.00
.80
948
742.2
10.4
60?!o G/MIN
38.90 L/100MIN
14.23 G/MIN
461.36 G/MIN
I .43 G/MIN
TEST HEIGHT 1134. K6( 2500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-31S-F
ODOMETER 16294. KMMO126. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .99
40.2
3.92
0.94
30.67
0.10
TEST NO. 948 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL 81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE I.7 1(105. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.97 MM HG(29.29 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
002 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
00 MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 05-66I9-O04
VEHICLE NO.94
DATE 7/27/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(73.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 130.5)
774.7 (30.5)
37.8 (100.0)
57736.
108.7 ( 3840.)
20.2/ 3/ 202.
I.I/ 3/ II.
39.3/ 2/2960.
.3/ II II.
15.21 3/ .24
2.3/ 3/ .04
4.6/ 2/ 3.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
24.36
191.
2876.
.21
3.4
12.00
364.11
413.0
.73
722.
.959 ( .940)
1.000 ( .978)
108.7
0.00
.83
948
744.0
11.9
23.9
500.2 G/MIN 34.3
32.90 L/100MIN 3.65
14.54 G/MIN 1.00
438.69 G/MIN 30.26
.90 G/MIN 0.06
-RABBIT MALFUNCTION
TEST WEIGHT 1134. KG( 23OO. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.7 KW( 7.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 16290. KMUOI22. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
D-33
-------
TABLE D-17. TEST NO. 951 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASE LINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 951 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL BO BUICX CENTURY
ENGINE 3.a H23i. CID> v-6
TRANSMISSION A3
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE a/12/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST HEIGHT 1644. KG( 3623. LBS>
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KH( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 90207. KMI31I97. MILES)
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HGC29.31 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20I
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20MN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG CC74.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 (JO.i)
43.3 (110.0)
24028.
44.8 ( 1582.)
26.3/ J/ 263.
t.4/ 3/ 14.
65.5/II/ 267.
.7/tt/ 2.
56.O/ 3/ .98
2.9/ J/ .04
60.9/ I/ IB.
3.7/ I/ I.
12.94
250.
255.
.94
17.1
6.46
13.29
773.5
1 .53
300.
.923 ( .903)
1.000 ( .970)
44.8
0.00
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.0}
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/min
L/IOCmin
HYDROCARBONS. (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
991
744.5
12.1
23.3
194.7
6.96
I .29
2.66
.31
IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 951 RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 5.8 LI23I. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HGI29.3! IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 63. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. M20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CtDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MCTER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (ORY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR ISCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/12/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY 8ULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG CC76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.3 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.9)
42.8 (109.0)
24038.
44.9 I 1584.)
75.0/ 2/ 75.
14.9/ 2/ 15.
5.2/I3/ 5.
2.5/I3/ 2.
23.I/ 3/ .37
3.3/ J/ .05
6.0/ I/ 2.
J.4/ I/ I.
35.02
61.
2.
.33
.8
I .57
.13
267.4
.07
300.
.971 ( .952)
I.OOO ( .976)
44.9
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3629. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50213. KMI31201. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.06
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/min
L/IOOmin
HYOROCAR80NS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/min
744.5
12.3
24.4
53.5
2.33
.31
.03
.01
D-34
-------
TABLE D-17 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 951 EMISSION RESULTS
CNYCC - VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICX BASE LINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 951 RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICX CENTURY
ENCINE 3.8 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.68 MM HG(29.20 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOKES INLET P MM. H20UN. M20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDE8. F>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANSE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
002 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS SRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM H6
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/12/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. }
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG CI75.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.8 8M/K8
CNYCC
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (JO.5)
39.4 <103.0)
57806.
108.1 ( 3817.)
80.2/ 3/ 802.
I.5/ 3/ 13.
60.1/12/ 132.
1.6/12/ 3.
28.4/ 3/ .47
2.9/ 3/ .04
23.O/ I/ 7.
3.1/ I/ 1.
23.92
788.
126.
.42
6.0
49.10
13.81
840.7
1.19
721.
.958 ( .942)
1.000 ( .979)
108.1
0.00
.80
991
741.7
9.8
23.9
1046.9
54.28
TEST WEIGHT 1644. K3( 3623. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 30224. KMI3I208. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .97
G/mln
L/100Bin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
61.14 G/min
19.69 G/Bin
1.49 G/Bin
70.0
3.61
4.09
1.32
0.10
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICX BASE LINE
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 951 RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI23I. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HG(29.3I IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRESISCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 8/12/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
OKI BULB TEMP. 25.6 OEG C(78.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY M.I SM/KO
H NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
41.7 (107.0)
57760.
108.0 ( 3814.)
78.6/ 2/ 79.
13.2/ 2/ 13.
27.0/13/ 25.
2.5/I3/ 2.
29.J/ 3/ .48
2.9/ }/ .04
13.6/ I/ 4.
3.3/ I/ I.
27.13
64.
22.
.44
3.1
3.98
2.78
871.0
.63
722.
.963 ( .947)
1.000 ( .978)
108.0
0.00
.79
931
744.5
M.I
1104^5 G/»in
48.06 L/lOOmin
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3623. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-f
ODOMETER 30218. KM(31204. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR (.01
3.05 G/min
3.53 G/«in
.82 G/«in
72.4
3.16
0.33
0.23
0.05
D-35
-------
TABLE D-18. TEST NO. 952 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 992 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L(23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70. PCT
SAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE B/t 3/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 OEG C(74.0 0£G F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.9 SM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.J)
774.7 (30.J)
43.3 (110.0)
24044.
44.7 ( 1979.)
32.4/ 3/ 324.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
6I.3/I2/ 135.
.9/12/ I.
38.7/ 3/ .6936
2.7/ 3/ .0413
45.9/ I/ 13.6
3.9/ I/ 1.0
19.17
312.
129.
.6149
12.7
8.04
6.74
903.0
1.17
300.
.948 ( .926)
1.000 I .971)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG! 3629. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-918-F
ODOMETER 90234. KM(312U. NILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.08
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEC C
G/ min
L/IOOmin
HYDROCARBONS. (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
992
742.7
12.9
23.3
100.6
4.60
1 .61
1.39
.23
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 992 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEU BO BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L(231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKORD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE ,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/nin
L/IOOmin
G/min
G/min
G/min
VEHICLE NO.99
DATE 8/13/B2
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 OEG ft
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.9 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.9)
774.7 (30.9)
43.3 (110.0)
23600.
43.9 ( 1990.)
81.8/ 2/ 82.
II.4/ 2/ 11.
3.6/I3/ 3.
1.2/I3/ 1.
24.2/ 3/ .3937
2.6/ 3/ .0397
7.2/ I/ 2.1
3.3/ I/ 1.0
33.32
71.
2.
.3992
I .2
1 .79
.1 1
289.3
.11
299.
.970 ( .948)
1.000 ( .974)
43.9
0.00
9.00
992
742.7
12.9
23.3
58.0
2.S3
.36
.02
.02
TEST WEI6HT 1644. K0( 3629. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-918-F
ODOMETER 90237. KMO1216. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR I.OB
D-36
-------
TABLE D-18 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 952 EMISSION RESULTS
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 942 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICX CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 1(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.66 MM HG(29.I6 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM.
BLOWER INLET P
H20UN. H2O)
H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(D£0.
SLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/13/82
BAG CART NO. t
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
C NYCC
774.7 130.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
57865.
107.4 ( 3792.)
74.7/ 3/ 747.
I.7/ 3/ 17.
59.7/I2/ 131.
2.8/I2/ 5.
29.9/ 3/ .4939
4.6/ 3/ .0707
23.I/ I/ 6.9
3.8/ 1/ 1.1
23.09
731.
122.
.4262
5.8
45.25
15.31
837.9
1 .14
722.
.957 ( .941)
1.000 ( .979)
107.4
0.00
.81
952
740.7
9.3
23.3
1029.4
52.72
23.3 DE6 C(74.0 DEG F)
9.3 6M/KG
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50252. KMC31225. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .96
G/nin
L/lOOkB
55.58 G/»in
18.81 G/min
1.40 G/min
69.6
3.55
3.76
1.27
0.09
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -8UICK BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 952 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 80BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L123I. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG129.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCXGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/13/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEO C(74.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.3)
43.3 (110.0)
97797.
107.5 ( 3793.)
76. V 2/ 76.
I1.8/ 2/ 12.
29.7/13/ 27.
1.6/13/ I.
29.8/ 3/ .4921
2.4/ 3/ .0367
14.O/ I/ 4.2
3.4/ I/ 1.0
26.67
65.
25.
S4568
3.2
4.02
3.14
898.8
.69
721.
.963 ( .942)
1.000 ( .974)
107.5
0.00
.81
952
742.7
12.1
23.3
I 107.9
48.22
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 )*>>
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 50242. KM(31219. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
G/nin 74.6
L/lOOmin 3.25
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
4.96 G/min
3.87 G/min
.85 G/min
0.33
0.26
0.06
D-37
-------
TABLE D-19. TEST NO. 953 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 953 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 5.6 L(231. CIO) V-«
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITT 77. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKSRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COi BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/16/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 DE6 CI70.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.4 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.9)
43.9 (111.0)
24080.
44.7 ( 1579.)
31.6/ 3/ 316.
I.3/ 3/ 13.
73.6/12/ 170.
1.8/U/ 3.
39.8/ 3/ .6740
3.I/ 3/ .0474
49.9/ I/ 14.8
4.9/ I/ 1.4
18.56
304.
160.
.6291
13.5
7.83
8.34
315.1
1.22
300.
.946 ( .923)
1.00D ( .969)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 6.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 30258. KMI31229. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.06
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/ min
L/IOOmin
G/ min
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE, S/ nun
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/ min
953
742.4
12.4
21.1
103.0
4.72
1.37
1.67
.24
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 953 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL HO BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE }.8 L(23I. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 73. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCf, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 8/16/82
SAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 DEG C(7I.O OEG ft
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 130.3)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
24032.
44.7 ( 1580.)
81.2/ 2/ 81.
12.3/ 2/ 12.
5.6/I3/ 3.
3.7/13/ 3.
22.7/ 3/ .3678
3.2/ 3/ .0490
6.9/ I/ 2.0
3.6/ I/ I.I
33.60
69.
2.
.3202
1.0
1 .79
.09
262.2
.09
300.
.972 ( .949)
1.000 ( .973)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG! 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KWI 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 30263. KM(31232. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON OIOXIOE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/min
L/IOCmin
HYDROCARBONS. (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIOCS OF NITROGEN, G/min
933
742.7
12.1
21.7
52.5
2.29
.36
.02
.02
D-38
-------
TABLE D-19 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 953 EMISSION RESULTS
CNYCC - VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 953 HUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 1(231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.41 MM HG129.I5 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 54. POT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CTCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H2O(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(D£0. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPM
THC BCKGRO MCTER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS 6RAMS
CO MASS SRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL ISCM)
SAM BLR (SCM>
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/16/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 KG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.0 QM/KG
CNYCC
774.7 130.5)
774.7 (30.J)
41.7 (107.0)
57702.
107.2 ( 3787.)
63.6/ 3/ 636.
1.6/ 3/ 1«.
59.1/12/ 129.
1.0/12/ 2.
31.3/ 3/ .5225
2.9/ 3/ .0444
25.9/ I/ 7.7
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50276. KMC31240. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .98
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
2.5/ I/
22.38
621.
124.
.4801
7.0
38.38
15.46
942.6
.7
1.40
721.
.955 I .
1.000 ( .
107.2
0.00
.82
953
740.4
10.0
23.3
1154.1
56.89
46.99
18.93
1.72
939)
976)
G/min
L/lOOmin
G/min
G/Bin
G/Bin
78.4
3.88
3.19
1.29
0.12
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BUICK BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-OO4
TEST NO. 95} RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE !.8 U231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 MM HG(29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/16/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
00Y BULB TEMP. 23.3 OEG CI74.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.4 GM/KG
H NYCC
7/4.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.3)
39.4 (103.0)
57816.
108.3 ( 3824.)
86.0/ 2/ 86.
11.4/ 2/ II.
39.7/13/ 3J.
3.5/I3/ 3.
29.6/ V .4883
3.2/ 3/ .0490
14.6/ I/ 4.3
3.2/ I/ .9
26.76
75.
33.
.4414
3.4
4.68
4.14
875.0
.73
722.
.963 ( .943)
1.000 ( .973)
108.3
0.00
.81
953
742.7
11.4
23.3
1081.3 G/min
47.28 L/100nin
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KS( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50263. KM(31232. NILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
3.79 G/min
5.12 G/Bin
.90 G/min
72.7
3.18
0.39
0.34
0.06
D-39
-------
TABLE D-20. TEST NO. 956 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 996 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 8" BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.41 MM HGI29.I5 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 81. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H201IN. M20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU."METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/18/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 DEG CI70.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 SM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 130.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
24096.
44.7 ( 1577.)
27.3/ 3/ 273.
I .I/ 3/ II.
83.5/ 2/4884.
.I/ 2/ 4.
41.8/ 3/ .7113
3.I/ 3/ .0474
21.6/ I/ 6.4
3.6/ I/ 1.1
11.10
263.
4686.
.6681
5.5
6.77
243.63
546.3
.51
300.
.910 ( .886)
1.000 ( .967)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-51B-F
ODOMETER 50290. KMC31249. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.09
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
956
740.4
13.1
21.1
109.3
8.12
1.35
48.73
.10
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 956 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 8U BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.66 MM HGC29.I6 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. 060. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/18/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.9 GM/KG
H IDLE
889.0 (35.0)
889.0 (35.0)
43.3 (110.0)
24026.
43.8 ( 1547.)
12.1/ 3/ 121.
I.2/ 3/ 12.
47.I/ 3/1143.
.I/ 3/ 2.
28.2/ S/ .4637
3.0/ 3/ .0459
28.O/ I/ 8.3
3.2/ I/ .9
22.85
1 10.
1 105.
.4198
7.4
2.77
56.37
336.7
.67
300.
.956 ( .935)
1.000 ( .973)
43.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 50295. KM(3I252. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.08
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
MM HO
G/KG
OEG C
G/ min
L/IOCmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
956
740.7
12.9
23.3
67.4
3.71
.55
11.28
.13
D-40
-------
TABLE D-20 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 956 EMISSION RESULTS
C NTCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI »/0 AIR
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 936 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL BO BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L(23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.66 MM HG(29.I6 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 63. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIP P MM. H2CHIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C<0£<3. D
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRE5(SCF)
TMC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANOE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
002 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO HETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS SRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/IS/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. )
CVS NO. 2
DRV BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG CI76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.4 GM/KG
C NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.3)
42.2 <10«.fll
57842.
107.4 ( 3794.)
13.O/ 3/ ISO.
!.»/ 3/ IJ.
32.6/ 3/1296.
.2/ J/ 3.
37.2/ 3/ .6260
3.V 3/ .0336
38.2/ I/ 17.3
3.0/ I/ 1.5
17.49
136.
1230.
.3734
13.9
8.42
136.32
1131.9
3.46
722.
.943 ( .924)
1.000 ( .974)
107.4
0.00
.80
936
740.7
12.4
24.4
1416.8 G/nin
73.02 L/lOOmin
TEST WEIGHT 1644. K0( 3623. LBS>
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 30316. KM(31263. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1-O«
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, 8/KM
10.34 G/uin
195.40 G/«4n
4.34 a/Ban
94.1
4.99
0.70
12.99
0.29
TEST NO. 936 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL tfo BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 03-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.93
DATE 8/18/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3623. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KWt 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3I8-F
ODOMETER 30236. KMI31213. MILES)
BAROMETER 740.92 MM HGI29.I7 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 81. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
002 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HO
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/tOOKM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 OEG 0(70.0 OES F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.3)
40.6 (103.0)
37742.
107.6 I 3800.)
12.If 3/ 127.
1.8/ 3/ 18.
36.8/ 3/ 872.
.2/ 3/ 3.
34.7/ 3/ .3803
2.9V 3/ .0444
68.3/ I/ 20.3
2.9/ I/ .9
19.80
110.
833.
.3381
19.3
6.82
104.63
1060.4
4.36
721.
.949 ( .923)
1.000 ( .968)
107.6
0.00
.80
936
740.9
13.1
21.1
1328.3
66.63
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.09
G/nin 88.2
L/lOOnin 4.44
8.33 G/Bin
130.70 G/»in
3.46 G/»in
0.57
8.71
0.36
D-41
-------
TABLE D-21. TEST NO. 957 EMISSION RESULTS
C IDLE' VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 957 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 80 8UICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L(231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.95 MM HG(29.25 IN HOI
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20>
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DE6. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METEH/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY!
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/19/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG CI74.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
24055.
44.8 ( 1580.)
27.6/ 3/ 276.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
80.9/ 2/4637.
.I/ 2/ 4.
43.8/ 3/ .7489
2.8/ 3/ .0428
23.8/ I/ 7.1
3.I/ I/ .9
10.95
265.
4468.
.7100
6.2
6.84
232.78
581.7
.56
300.
.909 ( .889)
1.000 ( .972)
44.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50323. KM(31269. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/min
L/IOOmin
YDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
957
743.0
12.1
23.3
116.4
8.28
1.37
46.57
.11
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST HO. 957 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL UOBUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.95 MM HG(29.25 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/19/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 OEG C(76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.6 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
24066.
44.8 ( 1582.)
11.9/ 3/ 119.
t.1/ 3/ It.
42.4/ 3/1017.
.3/ 3/ 7.
28.I/ 3/ .4619
2.3/ 3/ .0351
32.2/ I/ 9.6
3.3/ I/ 1.0
23.40
108.
983.
.4283
8.6
2.80
51 .26
351.4
.76
300.
.957 ( .939)
1.OOO ( .977)
44.8
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50327. KM(31272. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.03
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, OEG p
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/Min
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/IOOm
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
957
743.0
11.6
24.4
70.3
3.76
.56
10.25
.15
D-42
-------
TABLE D-21 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 957 EMISSION RESULTS
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 09-6619-004
TEST NO. 957 RUN t
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURV
ENGINE 3.8 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.93 MM HGC29.29 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62, PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METEH/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/K6
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/19/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRV BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(7S.O OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GMA6
C NYCC
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.5)
42.2 (toe.O)
37892.
IO7.9 ( 3810.)
1S.3/ 3/ 133.
I.4/ J/ 14.
51.V 3/1263.
.2/ 3/ >.
35.8/ If .6003
2.7/ 3/ .0413
33.3/ I/ 16.3
2.4/ I/ .7
18.13
140.
1221.
.3613
19.8
8.70
133.34
1109.0
3.40
722.
.943 ( .926)
I.OOO ( .974)
107.9
0.00
.80
937
743.0
11.9
23.9
1381.0
73.22
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3629. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW< 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE: EM-MB-F
ODOMETER 30342. KMI31281. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
G/Bin 92.2
L/100Min 4.87
HYDROCARBONS. (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
TEST NO. 957 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HG(29.26 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 36. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
002 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRV)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
10.83 G/min
122.67 G/min
4.23 G/»in
0.72
12.74
0.28
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 0»-6«19-O04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
S/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
VEHICLE NO.93
0 TE 8/19/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.0 DEG CI77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.4 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.3)
42.8 (109.0)
37807.
107.7 ( 3802.)
II.9/ 3/ 119.
1.0/ 3/ 10.
32.7/ 3/ 768.
.I/ 3/ 2.
33.2/ 3/ .3894
2.7/ 3/ .0413
73.2/ I/ 21.8
3.0/ t/ .9
19.83
110.
744.
.3302
20.9
6.80
93.21
1084.6
4.41
722.
.930 ( .932)
1.000 ( .976)
107.7
0.00
.79
957
743.2
11.4
23.0
1373.4
67.80
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3623. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KWI 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3I8-F
ODOMETER 30334. KM(31276. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
G/min 90.1
L/100»ln 4.45
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
8.62 G/min
117.09 G/»in
3.39 G/»in
D-43
0.57
7.75
0.37
-------
TABLE D-22. TEST NO. 958 EMISSION RESULTS
C-IOLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 958 RUN t
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 LI231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.98 MM HGI29.33 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF f MM
BLOWER INLET p
H20UN. H20)
H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEO. CIDEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRESISCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANflE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGHO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OfC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DOT)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/20/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG 0(75.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GM/KG
C-IOLE
774.7 (30.51
774.7 (30.5)
43.9 (ttl.O)
24017.
44.8 ( 1581.)
28.1/ 3/ 281.
I.5/ 3/ 15.
82.4/ 2/4778.
.2/ 2/ 7.
43.9/ 3/ .7508
3.3/ 3/ .0505
22.I/ \l 6.6
2.V I/ .7
10.81
267.
4601.
.7049
5.9
6.90
239.80
577.8
.54
299.
.907 ( .888)
1.000 ( .972)
44.8
.1.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KGI 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50347. KM(31284. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/min
L/tOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/ min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/ mj.n
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/ mm
TEST NO. 958 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 80 8UICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L(23I. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 745.24 MM HG(29.34 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO! MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
95B
745.0
12.6
23.9
115.9
8.37
1 .38
48.12
.11
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/O AIR
PROJECT 05-66I9-OO4
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/20/82
BAG CART NO. <
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG CO4.0 DEG F>
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.3 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
41.1 (106.0)
24030.
45.0 ( 1590.)
I2.6/ 3/ 126.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
50.4/ 3/1234.
.4/ 3/ 9.
28.II 3/ .4637
2.8/ 3/ .0428
30.O/ I/ 8.9
2.4/ I/ .7
22.48
112.
1 190.
.4228
8.2
2.90
62.39
348.6
.72
300.
.956 ( .936)
1.000 ( .976)
45.0
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KGI 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 50353. KMI31288. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, OEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/min
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/IOOmin
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/min
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/min
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/min
958
745.2
11 .3
23.3
69.7
3.89
.58
12.48
.15
D-44
-------
TABLE D-22 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 958 EMISSION RESULTS
C NTCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 03-6619-004
TEST NO. 958 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL SO BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 5.8 LI23I. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HG(29.3t IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 81. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. HZO>
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/R/WGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCMI
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
VEHICLE NO.9?
DATE 8/20/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 OEG CC71.0 OEG ft
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.6 GM/K6
C NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.J)
43.3 (110.0)
37788.
107.7 ( 3804.)
14.I/ 3/ 141.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
49.I/ 3/1198.
.I/ 3/ 2.
35.6/ 3/ .5967
2.8/ 3/ .0428
61.I/ I/ 18.2
2.7/ I/ .8
18.46
130.
1151.
.5562
17.4
8.05
144.34
1097.0
3.96
722.
.946 ( .921)
1.000 ( .968)
107.7
0.00
.80
938
744.5
13.6
21.7
1365.0
71.66
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG( 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-SI8-F
ODOMETER 50371. KM131399. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.10
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
10.02
180.43
4.93
G/min
L/lOOmin
G/rain
91.2
4.76
0.67
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - RBI W/0 AIR
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 958 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 80 BUICK CENTURY
ENGINE 3.8 L<231. CIO) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 745.24 MM HG(29.34 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRESCSCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE .
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
VEHICLE NO.95
DATE 8/20/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRV BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG CI74.0 OCG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.3 OM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.3)
43.9 (111.0)
57717.
107.6 ( 3800.)
12.3/ 3/ 123.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
34.4/ 3/ 811.
.3/ 3/ 7.
33.4/ 3/ .5930
2.6/ 3/ .0397
70.6/ I/ 21.0
2.8/ I/ .8
19.39
III.
779.
.3553
20.2
6.87
97.63
1094.2
4.25
721.
.949 ( .930)
1.000 ( .975)
107.6
0.00
.81
958
745.2
11.3
23.3
1359.1
67.30
TEST WEIGHT 1644. KG< 3625. LBS)
ACTUAL TOAD LOAD 8.4 KW( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 30360. KMI31292. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
8.53
120.-13
3.28
G/min
L/lOOmin
G/min
G/min
G/nin
D-45
91.1
4.54
0.57
8.12
0.35
-------
TABLE D-23. TEST NO. 961 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 961 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 11.230. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HGI29.26 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF f MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
002 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, KET (DRY)
SCF , KET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/25/82
BAG CART NO. <
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP- 23.9 DEG C(75.0 OE6 F>
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
24053.
44.8 ( 1381.)
34.7/ 3/ 347.
I.5/ 3/ 15.
87.»/ 3/2447.
.I/ 3/ 2.
34.I/ 3/ .9467
3.3/ 3/ .0505
40.I/ 2/ 40.1
I.I/ 2/ t.l
11.02
333.
2348.
.9O07
39.1
8.60
122.37
738.2
3.57
3OO.
.909 ( .890)
1.000 ( .970)
44.8
0.00
TEST HEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 93974. KM(58393. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON 01 OX IDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100MIN
G/MIN
G/*IN
961
743.2
12.6
23.9
147.7
a.ia
1.72
24.48
.71
TEST NO. 961 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 LI250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HG(29.26 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. M20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLO* STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6«19-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/25/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
OKI BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG CI75.0 DEG F)
A8S. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.3)
41.1 (106.0)
24020.
44.9 ( 1585.)
88.9/ 2/ 89.
II.9/ 2/ 12.
9.5/I3/ 9.
3.6/13/ 3.
23.V 3/ .3781
3.2/ 3/ .0490
3.I/ 2/ 3.1
t.l/ 2/ 1.1
34.35
77.
5.
.3306
2.0
2.00
.27
271.6
.18
300.
.971 ( .951)
1.000 ( .976)
44.9
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1614. KG( 40OO. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KK( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3I8-F
ODOMETER 93979. KMC58396. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/ MIN
L/100 MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
961
743.2
11 .9
23.9
34.3
2.38
.40
.05
.04
D-46
-------
D-23 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 961 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 961 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 1(250. CID)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.44 MM HG(29.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 61. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(OEG. ft
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANOE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR ISCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 09-6619*004
VEHICLE NO,96
DATE 8/25/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYMO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 OEG 0(73.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.9 ON/KG
C NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.»)
41.7 (107.0)
97846.
107.9 ( 3808.)
18.9/ 3/ 189.
I.I/ 3/ 11.
25.3/ 3/ 567.
.I/ 3/ 2.
3«.0/ ]/ -6O40
3.0/ 3/ .0459
14.I/ 2/ 14.1
1.3/ 2/ 1.3
19.72
179.
966.
.5604
12.9
11.10
71.06
1106.6
2.67
721.
.949 ( .930)
1.0OO ( .979)
107.9
0.00
.81
961
742.4
10. 9
22.8
1373.3
66.40
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KGl 4OOO. LBS)
ACTUAL MAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 93992. KM(38404. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
13.78
68.19
3.32
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/MIN
92.1
4.48
0.92
TEST NO. 961 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 1(250. CID)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 63. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. N20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/25/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY 8ULB TEMP. 24.4 DEO CI76.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.4 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
39.4 (103.0)
97800.
106.4 ( 3827.)
85.6/ 2/ 86.
10.9/ If II.
15.9/13/ 14.
3.0/13/ 3.
31.I/ 3/ .5153
2.9/ 3/ .0444
7.5/ 2/ 7.5
I.4/ 2/ 1.4
29.91
75.
II.
.4727
6.2
4.69
1.44
937.9
1.35
722.
.961 ( .941)
1.000 ( .975)
108.4
0.00
.80
961
743.3
12.4
1167^0 G/MIN 77.9
50.72 L/100 MIN 3.37
5.84 G/MIN 0.39
1.80 G/MIN 0.12
1-68 G/MIN 0.11
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 93984. KM(58399. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.06
D-47
-------
TABLE D-24. TEST NO. 962 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 961 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L(250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.95 MM HGI29.25 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 63. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM,
BLOWER INLET P I
H20UN. H20I
H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DCO. CIDEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANQE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANSE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/26/82
BAG CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 OE6 0(76.0 DEC F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 12.4 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 UIO.O)
24117.
44.9 I 1584.)
68.8/ 3/ 688.
I.3/ 3/ 13.
95.5/ 3/2752.
.2/ 3/ 5.
52.8/ 3/ .9213
2.6/ 3/ .0397
42.I/ 2/ 42.1
1.5/ 2/ 1.5
tO.68
676.
2644.
.8853
40.7
17.50
138.10
727.3
3.70
300.
.906 ( .888)
1.000 ( .971)
44.9
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-5I8-F
ODOMETER 94000. KMI5B409. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.06
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE ,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/WIN
962
743.0
12.4
24.4
145.5
8.54
3.50
27.62
.74
TEST NO. 962 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 LI250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.95 MM HGI29.23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 69. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO2 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL ISCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/26/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEC C(73.0 DEG F)
A8S. HUMIDITY 12.4 GM/KG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.51
774.7 (30.5)
40.0 (104.0)
24041.
45.0 ( 1589.)
88.O/ 2/ 88.
10.9/ 2/ 11.
I3.8/13/ U.
4.1/13/ 4.
26.6/ 3/ .4355
2.4/ 3/ .0367
3.9/ 2/ 3.9
1.3/ 2/ 1.3
30.07
77.
9.
.4001
2.6
2.01
.45
329.6
.24
300.
.967 ( .945)
1.000 ( .974)
45.0
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 94003. KM(584I1. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.06
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIOES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
962
743.0
12.4
22.8
65.9
2.87
.40
.09
.05
D-48
-------
TABLE D-24 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 962 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 962 RUN t
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L(250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.66 MM HGI29.16 IN HC)
RELATIVE HUMIOITY 56. PCT
SAG RESULTS
TEST CTCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM.
BLOWER INLET P M
H20UN. H20)
H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OES. C(DE6. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
THC BCKQRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGt/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL ISCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIOITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 01-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/26/82
BAC CART NO. I
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIOITY 10.9 GM/KG
C NYCC
774.7 <30.»)
774.7 (30.5)
42.2 (IOa.0)
97879.
107.9 ( 3796.)
26.t/ 3/ 266.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
80.7/11/ 368.
1.0/11/ 3.
34.6/ 3/ .9784
J.O/ 3/ .0499
14.3/ 2/ 14.3
t.9/ 2/ 1.9
20.91
294.
394.
.9347
12.9
19.7J
44.32
1092.6
2.67
722.
.992 ( .939)
1.000 ( .977)
107.9
0.00
.82
962
740.7
10.9
24.4
1290.9
61.36
TEST WEIGHT 1814.
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-918-F
ODOMETER 94016. KM(98419. MILES)
KG( 4000. LBS)
7.8 KW( 10.9 HP)
NOX HUMIOITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
19.28
94.36
3.27
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/HIN
G/HIN
G/MIN
87.5
4.18
1.31
3.68
0.22
TEST NO. 962 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L(250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HOI 29.26 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIOITY 70. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20I
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDE6. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
MOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER ,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE ,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/10OKM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -BASELINE
PROJECT 49-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/26/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 33.3 066 C174.0 OEG F>
ABS. HUMIOITY 12.9 GM/KG
H NYCC
174.7 (30.9)
774.7 (30.3)
39.4 (103.0)
97738.
108.2 ( 3821.)
84.7/ 2/ 89.
II.O/ II II.
I9.3/13/ 18.
3.3/13/ 3.
30.V 3/ .9046
2.9/ 3/ .0382
7.9/ 2/ 7.9
1.4/ 2/ 1.4
26.03
74.
14.
.4678
6.6
4.63
1.79
927.0
1.46
721.
.962 ( .940)
1.000 ( .973)
108.2
0.00
.61
962
743.2
12.9
23.3
1143.6 G/MIN 77.1
49.73 L/100 NIN 3.35
3.71 G/MIN 0.39
2.21 G/MIN 0.15
1.80 G/MIN 0.12
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-9IB-F
ODOMETER 94010. KM(98419. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.08
D-49
-------
TABLE D-25. TEST NO. 963 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. ^3 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 LI250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HGI29.3I IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITr 66. PCT
SAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/31/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GM/KG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
24116.
45.0 ( 1588.)
76.t/ 3/ 761.
I.6/ 3/ 16.
95.3/ 3/2744.
.2/ 3/ 5.
50.9/ 3/ .8845
2.7/ 3/ .0413
47.4/ 2/ 47.4
1.2/ 2/ 1.1
10.94
746.
2635.
.8470
46.3
19.36
137.93
697.3
4.24
300.
.909 ( .889)
t.OOO ( .970)
45.0
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LRS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 94071. KM(5B453. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KO
DEG C
G/ MIN
L/100 MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
962
744.5
12.6
23.9
139.5
8.33
3.87
27.59
.85
D-50
-------
TABLE D-26. TEST NO. 966 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 966 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 LI230. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.17 MM HGI29.I8 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20>
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STB. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
C IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - R.B.I.
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/27/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 OEG C<75.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GMAG
C IDLE
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.9)
43.3 (110.0)
24108.
44.7 ( 1979.)
33.3/ 3/ 353.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
86.V 3/2390.
.2/ 3/ 5.
53.7/ 3/ .9389
2.7/ 3/ .0413
49.»/ 2/ 49.9
I.8/ 2/ 1.8
11.13
339.
2295.
.9013
48.3
8.75
119.50
738.1
4.30
300.
.910 ( .892)
1.000 ( .971)
44.7
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG! 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-J18-F
ODOMETER 94023. KM(58423. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/MIN
966
741.2
11.9
23.9
147.7
8.14
1 .75
23.91
.86
TEST NO. 966 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L<250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.17 MM HGI29.18 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF f MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRESISCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS 6RAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
H IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS * R.B.I.
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/27/82
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG CO4.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.4 GMAG
H IDLE
774.7 (30.3)
774.7 (30.3)
42.2 (108.0)
24034.
44.7 I 1578.)
62.4/ 2/ 62.
11.3/ 2/ 11.
IO.O/13/ 9.
2.5/13/ 2.
29.I/ 3/ .4796
2.8/ 3/ .0428
5.9/ 2/ 3.9
I.4/ 2/ 1.4
27.33
32.
7.
.4384
4.6
1.33
.33
338.6
.40
300.
.964 ( .944)
1.000 ( .976)
44.7
0.00
3.00
966
741.2
11.4
23.3
71.7
3.10
.27
.07
.08
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 1O.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-318-F
ODOMETER 94028. KM(38426. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
D-51
-------
TABLE D-26 (Cont'd). TEST NO. 966 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 966 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 1(250. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 738.63 MM HG(29.08 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 61. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER OIF P MM. H201IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. M20IIN. H20)
SLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIOITT,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
OEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -
PROJECT 03-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/27/82
BAG CART NO. t
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 OEG C(73.0 DCS F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.0 GM/KG
C NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.2 (108.0)
57821.
107.1 ( 3781.)
16.O/ 3X 160.
I.O/ 3/ 10.
96.2/1 I/ 498.
.7/1I/ 2.
37.3/ 3/ .6278
2.7/ 3/ .0413
18.9/ 2/ 18.»
I.4/ 2/ 1.4
19.36
151.
480.
.5887
17.6
9.29
59.86
1154.0
3.63
721.
.948 ( .930)
1.000 ( .974)
107.1
0.00
.81
966
738.6
11.0
22.8
1421.3
67.16
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 Kw( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 94040. KMI58434. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, GAM
TEST NO. 966 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 LU50. CID)
TRANSMISSION A3
I 1.45
73.73
4.47
G/MIN
L/100 MJN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
96.0
4.53
0.77
4.98
0.30
BAROMETER 740.92 I
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
M HGI29.17
59. PCT
IN HG)
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KC
OEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 05-66I9-OO4
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/27/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG CI76.0 OEG F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 11.7 GM/KG
H NYCC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
39.4 (103.0)
57744.
107.9 ( 3809.)
60.V 2/ 61.
10.9/ 2/ II.
I6.6/13/ 15.
2.4/13/ 2.
33.5/ 3/ .5585
2.6/ 3/ .0397
10.6/ 2/ 10.6
I.5/ II t.5
23.67
50.
13.
.5204
9.2
3.1 I
1 .58
1027.7
1 .95
721.
.958 ( .939)
1.000 ( .9761
107.9
0.00
.79
966
740.9
11 .7
24.4
1302.2
56.25
5.94
2.00
2.47
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KQ( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 94034. KM(58430. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
L/100MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
85.5
3.70
0.26
0.13
0.16
D-52
-------
TABLE D-27. TEST NO. 967 EMISSION RESULTS
TEST NO. 967 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L(290. CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
C NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 05-66I9-O04
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/30/82
BAG CART NO. t
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 40OO. UBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.9 HP)
GASOLINE CM-918-F
ODOMETER 94O69. KMC58449. MILES)
BAROMETER 740.66 MM HG<29.16 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 63. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
SLOWER OIF P MM. H20IIN. H2O)
SLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CtDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PCT
CO2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL
-------
APPENDIX E
Table E
Table E
Table E
Table E
Table E
Table E
ADDITIONAL TEST RESULTS
-1 Ford Fairlane - Test 917-30 Second Cold
Start Idle
-2 Chevrolet Nova - Test 963-30 Second Cold
Start Idle
Ford Fairlane - Test 917 - Hot Modified NYCC
4875 Inertia Weight
Chevrolet Nova - Test 967 - Hot Modified NYCC
4875 Inertia Weight
Test 918 - Cold Idle
Test 919 - Cold Idle
,-4
-5
-6
Ford Fairlane -
Ford Fairlane -
-------
TABLE E-l.
C-IDLE - VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 917 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 L(302. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.90 MM H6(29.13 IN H6 )
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
w
I
CO
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME
DFC
SECONDS
WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 5/20/82
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.6 DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.5 GM/KG
30 S
774.7 (30.5)
767.1 (30.2)
43.9 (111.0)
2408.
4.5 ( 157.)
47.4/ 3/ 474.
1.6/ 3/ 16.
28.5/ 3/ 664.
.21 3/ 5.
30.9/ 3/ .51
3.2/ 3/ .05
6.4/ 2/ 6.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
21.48
459.
643.
.47
5.3
1.18
3.34
38.0
.04
30.
.953 ( .938)
1.000 ( .979)
4.5
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-516-F
ODOMETER «»»»»* KM(67538. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.99
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS,
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/IOOMIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
917
739.9
10.5
25.6
75.9
4.01
2.36
6.67
.09
-------
TABLE E-2.
TEST NO. 963 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L(250. CID)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HG(29.31 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 66. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIP P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
W CO CONCENTRATION PPM
' C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
002 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
30 SEC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/31/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GM/KG
30 SEC
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
2412.
4.5 ( 159.)
14.3/ 4/1430.
1.6/ 3/ 16.
72.2/ 1/7683.
.2/ 3/ 5.
26.8/ 3/ .4391
2.7/ 3/ .0413
2.6/ 2/ 2.6
1.2/ 2/ 1.2
10.09
1416.
7450.
.4019
1 .5
3.67
39.01
33.1
.01
30.
.901 ( .882)
1.000 ( .975)
4.5
0.00
KG( 4000. LBS)
7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
TEST WEIGHT 1814.
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 94071. KM(58453. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/MIN
L/100MIN
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/MIN
962
744.5
12.6
23.9
66.2
9.05
7.34
77.98
.03
-------
TABLE E-3. H - NYCC - VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 05-6619-004
- FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
TEST NO. 917 RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 LC302. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HG(29.13 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER /RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER /RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
'
CO
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 5/20/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.7 GM/KG
H-NY
789.9 (31.1)
784.9 (30.9)
42.8 (109.0)
57701.
106.8 ( 3770.)
13.4/ 3/ 134.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
67.6/ 3/1745.
.I/ 3/ 2.
37.5/ 3/ .63
2.5/ 3/ .04
16.2/ 2/ 16.
.7/ 2/ 1.
16.46
120.
1692.
.60
15.5
7.38
210.29
1164.3
3.17
720.
.939 ( .923)
1.000 ( .977)
106.8
0.00
.77
91.7
739.9
10.7
25.0
1512.1
84.16
9.59
273.10
4.12
TEST WEIGHT 2211. KG(4875, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-516-F
ODOMETER *»»»»» KM(67549. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
G/MIN
L/100 MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
97.0
5.40
0.62
17.52
0.26
-------
TABLE E-4,
TEST NO. 967 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEVROLET NOVA
ENGINE 4.1 L(250. CID)
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.71 MM H6(29.28
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
IN HG)
W
I
en
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20ON. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
THC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
THC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
THC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
THC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
H NYCC- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS -
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.96
DATE 8/30/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.6 GM/KG
H NYCC
TEST WEIGHT 2211. KG( 4875. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.8 KW( 10.5 HP)
GASOLINE EM-518-F
ODOMETER 94058. KM(58445. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
39.4 (103.0)
57730.
108.3 ( 3824.)
58. 3/ 2/ 58.
11. 9/ 2/ 12.
29.8/13/ 27.
2.9/13/ 3.
35. O/ 3/ .5857
3.1/ 3/ .0474
14. O/ 2/ 14.0
1.4/ 2/ 1.4
22.55
47.
24.
.5404
12.7
2.93
3.04
1071.3
2.70
722.
.956 ( .937)
1.000 ( .975)
108.3
0.00
.78
967
743.7
11 .6
24.4
1365.7 G/MIN
59.06 L/100MIN
3.74 G/MIN
3.87 G/MIN
3.45 G/MIN
89.0
3.83
0.24
0.25
0.22
-------
TABLE E-5.
TEST NO. 9l8 RUN
VEHICLE MODEL .70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 L(302. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.66 MM H6(29.I6 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 56. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIP P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
n CO CONCENTRATION PPM
' C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
cr>
C-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 05-6619-004
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 5/19/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.9 GM/KG
C-ID
774.7 (30.5)
764.5 (30.1)
43.9 (111.0)
24232.
44.9 ( 1587.)
48.5/ 3/ 485.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
86.9/ 2/5228.
.I/ 2/ 4.
69.5/ 3/ 1.25
2.9/ 3/ .04
39.3/ 2/ 39.
.5/ 2/ 1.
7.43
472.
5005.
1.22
38.9
12.23
261.81
1000.0
3.37
302.
.865 ( .850)
1.000 ( .970)
44.9
0.00
- FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-516-F
ODOMETER 10865. KM( 6751. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/MIN
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100
HYDROCARBONS, G/MIN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/MIN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/..jN
MIN
918
740.7
10.9
24.4
198.7
12.30
2.43
52.02
0.67
-------
TABLE E-6.
C-IDLE- VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - FAIRLANE RICH BEST IDLE
PROJECT 05-6619-004
TEST NO. 919 RUN I
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FAIRLANE
ENGINE 4.9 L(302. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.92 MM HG(29.17 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER 01F P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
w CO CONCENTRATION PPM
I C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
~° NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO2 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
VEHICLE NO.91
DATE 5/21/82
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.4 GM/KG
C-IO
784.9 (30.9)
772.2 (30.4)
43.9 (111.0)
24960.
46.2 ( 1633.)
27.4/ 3/ 274.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
71.3/ 3/1864.
.I/ 3/ 2.
50.I/ 3/ .87
3.3/ 3/ .05
9.6/ 21 10.
.4/ 2/ 0.
12.46
262.
1789.
.82
9.2
6.99
96.29
696.5
.90
311.
.920 ( .899)
1.000 ( .969)
46.2
0.00
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG(
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9
GASOLINE EM-516-F
ODOMETER 0. KM(
4000. LBS)
KW( 12.0 HP)
0. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.10
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS,
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
6/M'IN
L/100.
G/MIN
MIN
919
740.9
13.4
23.9
134.4
7.17
1.35
18.58
0.17
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
REPORT NO.
EPA 460/3-83-006
2.
TITLE AND SUBTITLE
UNREGULATED EMISSIONS FOR VEHICLES OPERATED
UNDER LOW SPEED CONDITIONS
J. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOr*NO.
REPORT DATE
May 1983
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
AUTHOR(S)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
Lawrence R. Smith
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-3073
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report (4/82-9/82)
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions from six automobiles with various
emission control systems at idle and low speed operation. The auto-
mobiles were evaluated at manufacturer's specifications and under
malfunction operation. Exhaust emission constituents measured, in
addition to the currently regulated emissions, include: sulfates,
aldehydes and ketones, cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
Air Pollution
Exhaust Emissions
Motor Vehicles
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Emission Characterizatioi
Emission Test Procedures
Light-Duty Vehicles
Low Speed Emissions
COSATi Field/Group
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
155
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
------- |