Salt Water Detection in the Cimarron Terrace, Oklahoma


EPA-660/3-74-033
APRIL 1975
                                   Ecological Research Series
 Salt  Water  Detection  in the
 Cimarron  Terrace, Oklahoma
                                                   01
                                     Office of Research and Development
                                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                           Corvallis, Oregon 97330

-------
                      RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, have been grouped into
five series.  These five broad categories were established to
facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in
related fields.  The five series are:

          1.   Environmental Health Effects Research
          2.   Environmental Protection Technology
          3.   Ecological Research
          4.   Environmental Monitoring
          5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH STUDIES
series.  This series describes research on the effects of pollution
on humans, plant and animal species, and materials.  Problems
are assessed for their long- and short-term influences.  Investigations
include formation, transport, and pathway studies to determine
the fate of pollutants and their effects.  This work provides
the technical basis for setting standards to minimize undesirable
changes in living organisms in the aquatic, terrestrial and atmospheric
environments.

This report has been reviewed by the Office of Research and
Development, EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval does
not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and
policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention
of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.

-------
                                            EPA-660/3-74-033
                                            APRIL 1975
               SALT WATER DETECTION

                      IN  THE

           CIMARRON  TERRACE, OKLAHOMA
                        by
         Oklahoma  Water Resources  Board
              2241  N.W. 40th Street
          Oklahoma  City,  Oklahoma  73112
                  Grant S-800994
              Program Element  IBA024
              ROAP/Task No. 21 AKQ/12
                 Project Officer

                 Marlon R. Scalf
        Subsurface Environmental  Branch
Robert S.  Kerr  Environmental  Research Laboratory
     National  Environmental  Research Center
                Ada, Oklahoma  74820
     NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL  RESEARCH CENTER
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH  AND  DEVELOPMENT
     U.  S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             CORVALLIS, OREGON  97330

             *'?' Sail by the National Technical Information Service
             U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22151

-------
                          ABSTRACT

The objectives of this project were to demonstrate the appli-
cability of surface resistivity techniques to delineate salt
water contamination in a shallow alluvial aquifer, to outline
areas of salt water contamination in a valuable terrace aquifer,
to permit safe future development, and to identify the sources
of such contamination.

Surface resistivity using the Wenner spread and both Barnes
layer and apparent resistivity interpretive methods was found
useful in outlining areas of major water quality changes where
the geologic environment was simple and the terrace composed
of sand.  However, where clay was present in the terrace or
where the bedrock relief was large, surface resistivity was
not found to be an accurate definitive tool.

Two large areas of salt water contamination were intensively
studied by test drilling.  In one of these areas resistivity
was extensively used.  Brine contamination of one of these
areas was attributed to oil field brine evaporation pits while
the other area was contaminated by natural brines from the
underlying bedrock.   The sodium/chloride ratio  was used to
identify the source of brines.

This  report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant Number
R800994 (16060 FRY)  by the  Oklahoma Water Resources Board
under the sponsorship of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Work  was  completed as of March 1974.

-------
                          CONTENTS
                                                       Page
ABSTRACT                                                  ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                                          vi
CONCLUSIONS                                                1
RECOMMENDATIONS                                            2
INTRODUCTION                                               4
     GENERAL                                               4
     PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION                              5
     GEOLOGY OF AREA                                       8
     GROUNDWATER POLLUTION                                12
     PROJECT THEORY                                       14
     PROJECT DESCRIPTION                                     1 9
DISCUSSION                                                23
     WATER QUALITY                                        23
     RESISTIVITY                                          39
     SODIUM/CHLORIDE RATIO                                48
     AQUIFER RESTORATION                                  49
BIBLIOGRAPHY                                              52
APPENDIX  A                                               57
     TABLE A-l  WATER WELL  DATA                           59
     TABLE A-2  WATER QUALITY  DATA                         81
     TABLE A-3  WATER QUALITY  DATA  -  OIL  FIELD BRINES     98
     TABLE A-4  RESISTIVITY STATIONS                      101
     TABLE A-5  LITHOLOGIC  LOGS                           113
                               ill

-------
                            FIGURES

 No.
 1 .   Location Map
 2.   Geologic Map of the Cimarron Terrace Area
 3.   Number of Salt Water Pollution Complaints
      Per Township and Locations of Oil and Gas
      Fields
 4.   Waste Disposal Facilities in the Cimarron          15
      Terrace
 5.   Schematic of Electrical  Surface Resistivity        16
 6.   Profile of Water Quality of the Cimarron           20
      Ri ver
 7.   Areas of Major Pollution in the Cimarron           22
      Terrace
 8.   Geologic Map - Crescent Area                       24
 9.   Well Locations - Crescent Area                     25
10.   Bedrock Contour Map - Crescent Area                26
11.   Isopach Map - Crescent Area                        27
12.   Water Table Contour Map - Crescent Area            28
13.   Chloride Content of Groundwater - Crescent Area    29
14.   Total Dissolved Solids in the Shallow Ground-      30
      water - Crescent Area
15.   Specific Conductance of Groundwater - Crescent     31
      Area
16.   Geologic Map - Dover Area                          33
17.   Well Locations - Dover Area                        34
18.   Bedrock Contour Map - Dover Area                   35
19.   Water Table Contours - Dover Area                  36
20.   Chlorides - Dover Area                             37
21.   Total  Dissolved Solids - Dover Area                38
22.   Locations of Resistivity Stations - Crescent       40
      Area
23.   Plot of Station Data - 34-5                        41
24.   Plot of Station Data - 21-2                        43
25.   Plot of Station Data - 22-1                         44
                               i v

-------
                     FIGURES (Continued)


No.                                                     Page

26.   Surface Resisti vity - Apparent Resistivity at       46
     80 Feet - Crescent Area

27.   Surface Resistivity- Barnes Layer - Crescent       47
     Area

28.   Diagram showing wel1-numbering system used
     in Oklahoma                                        58

-------
                       ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The support of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Dr. Lloyd
E. Church, D.D.S., Chairman, Gerald E. Borelli, Vice Chairman,
Orville B. Saunders, Secretary, and members L. L. Males, Don
Arch King, Jacques Cunningham, Earl Walker, Bill Settle, and
Guy Keith, was greatly appreciated.

The cooperation of all the public officials, individuals and
companies who provided supervision, information and accomp-
lished the work required in completion of this project and
preparation of the publication is acknowledged with sincere
thanks.

Marion R. Scalf, EPA Grant Project Officer at the completion
of the project, and Leslie G. McMillion, EPA Grant Project
Officer at the inception of the project, have been most help-
ful in pursuing the project goals.

Engineering Enterprises, Inc., Norman, Oklahoma, provided
continuing technical consulting services from the inception
of the project and throughout the performance of the work.
The report was co-authored by Lee C. Burton, Professional
Engineer, Oklahoma Water Resources Board and John S. Fryberger,
Consulting Hydrogeologist with Engineering Enterprises, Inc.,
Norman,  Oklahoma.   Robert C. Minning of Keck Consulting
Services, Inc., provided the computer program for calculating
corrected resistivities from apparent resistivities, and
Donald F. Malott of the Michigan State Department of Highways
assisted in utilizing the Barnes layer method of resistivity
interpretation.

The support of the County Commissioners of Logan, Kingfisher,
and Major Counties of Oklahoma, is acknowledged with sincere
thanks.  Mr.  C. R.  Long, Water Superintendent for the City of
                              vi

-------
Enid,  Oklahoma,  for support and valuable Information  on  water
supp I y welIs.

The local Water Users Association of Logan and Kingfisher
Counties of  Oklahoma provided valuable assistance in  locating
pollution problems.  Mr.  Chester Jech and Mr.  E.  M.  Cunard of
Crescent, Oklahoma, provided valuable information concerning
the deterioration of water quality near Crescent, Oklahoma.

Mr. Bob Barr,  attorney in Hennessey, Oklahoma, assisted  as
contact with local residents for permission to drill  test holes,
Install observation wells and make resistivity surveys.

Ewbank,  Inc.,  of Fairview, Oklahoma, drilled the test holes;
installed the  observation wells; and provided  data on irrigation,
Industrial,  and public water supply wells and  test hole   logs in
the Cimarron Terrace of Oklahoma.

Mr. Forrest Nelson, Executive Director of the  Oklahoma Water
Resources Board, assisted  in many ways, reviewed the material
and made valuable  suggestions.  Personnel of the Oklahoma
Water Resources Board most closely associated  with the direction
and performance of the project  include Glenn H.  Sullivan,  P. E.,
Assistant Director and Project  Officer for the Oklahoma  Water
Resources Board;  Lee C. Burton, P. E., Geological Engineer;
Alan Haws, P.  E.,  Chief Engineer; and Terry L. Thurman,   Civil
Eng i neer.

Other personnel of the Oklahoma Water Resources  Board performing
field and office  work on  the  project were  J.  A.  Wood and  Mike
Melton,  Civil  Engineers;  Dannie Spiser,  Ground Water Geologist;
Bill Potter, Zack  Williams,  and Steve Zelgler, LimnoIogIsts;
W.  T. Archer and  Wayne Evatt,  Hydrologlsts; and  L. C. Simpson,
Eng I neerIng A Ide.
                                vi I

-------
All groundwater  samples were analyzed by the Oklahoma Water
Resources Board Laboratory under the supervision of Larry
Edmison, Chief Chemist.

Under the supervision of James Leewright, Chief Draftsman,
Lesa Haley, Draftsman, completed all of the drafting and
illustrations used in the project publication.

Special  thanks goes to Margaret Graham and Karen Recer who
typed and edited all  the material.
                              v i i i

-------
                         CONCLUSIONS

By using surface resistivity techniques,  test  drilling,  and
sodium/chloride ratios in terrace  deposits  of  the  Cimarron
River in northwestern Oklahoma,  the following  conclusions
can be made concerning  groundwater in  that area.

1.  Two areas of widespread salt water  contamination  and
    numerous instances of localized contamination  were
    delineated in the Cimarron Terrace.

2.  In the large contaminated area near Crescent,  the source
    of the salt water is from oil-field brines which  were
    allowed to seep into the terrace sands through evaporation
    pits.

3.  In the large contaminated area near Dover, the source of
    contamination is naturally occurring salt water in the
    Permian bedrock formation underlying terrace deposits.

4.  Surface resistivity can serve as a valuable exploration
    tool in delineating salt water pollution  in a shallow
    aquifer, but its usefulness decreases markedly where the
    geology is complex or where significant clay and  silt is
    present in the zone of  interest.

5.  The  sodium/chloride ratio has proven to be a valuable
    method for distinguishing natural salt water pollution
    due  to the dissolving of halite  in the formations from
    pollution  caused  by disposal  of  oil-field brines.

6.  A  large amount of time, on  the order of 100 years or more,
    will  be  required  before the salt water is flushed from  the
     terrace  under  natural  flow  gradients.
                               1

-------
                       RECOMMENDATIONS

Although surface resistivity was shown  to be effective in
delineating salt water contamination in a shallow alluvial
aquifer in a simple geologic environment, its effectiveness
diminishes as the geology grows more complex.  It is recommend-
ed, therefore, that additional  work be  aimed at developing
new methodology to meet these exploration needs; and that  new
interpretive methods be explored to render surface resistivity
more definitive in complex geologic environments.  Until  a
more effective surface geophysical  method is developed, down-
hole logging should be used in  conjunction with test holes  to
establish water salinity.  Although this approach requires
extensive drilling, water sampling  is limited to control  points
only, thereby reducing overall  costs.

The water monitoring wells established  under this project
should be periodically sampled  to form  a record of the rate
of flushing of the salt from the aquifer and to monitor spread-
ing of the contamination.

The Oklahoma Water Resources Board  should restrict large
groundwater withdrawals in the vicinity of the contaminated
areas in order to minimize the movement of salt water into
uncontaminated areas.  In areas of oil-field brine pollution,
salt water should be allowed to flow under the natural hydrau-
lic gradient and to discharge  into the Cimarron River.  Where
contamination is caused by naturally occurring salt water
from the underlying bedrock formations, withdrawal of the
overlying fresh water  should be somewhat restricted in order
to avoid induced infiltration  of the salt water  from  below.

Finally, it  is recommended that a more intensive  salt water
disposal policing program be initiated by appropriate state'

-------
agencies.  Although unlined salt water evaporation pits for
the disposal of oil-field brines are prohibited in the State
of Oklahoma, several were observed during the field work on
this project.  As demonstrated by this project, such pollution
restricts use of that part of the aquifer for many generations

-------
                        INTRODUCTION

GENERAL

Throughout the United States,  local  instances of groundwater
contamination by brines have occurred.   Such contamination
has resulted from:   salt water intrusion in coastal  areas
induced by overpumping freshwater; groundwater movement over
natural bodies of halite; improper disposal of oil-field or
other industrial brines; and the application of salts used
in highway deicing.

Determining tire areal extent of salt water contamination in
an aquifer is fundamental for establishing control measures
and for proper groundwater management criteria for utilizing
uncontaminated portions of an aquifer.

Two general approaches exist for determining the areal extent
of salt water pollution in aquifers.  Collecting water samples
from existing wells and drilling test holes  from which water
samples are taken constitute a direct approach.  An  indirect
approach  is the use of geophysical methods  to measure some
parameter  related to  the presence or absence of salt  in  the
groundwater.  If such  an indirect approach  can  be successfully
demonstrated, considerable time and money  can be  saved.

There  is  an additional  need to develop  methodology  for  identi-
fying  the  source of  salt water contamination  so that  sound
measures  can  be  taken.

The  purpose  of  this  study,  therefore,  is  to demonstrate  the
applicability of surface  resistivity techniques in  delineat-
ing  and quantitating  salt water contamination of  shallow
fresh  aquifers  and  to develop  a method  of identifying the

-------
source of such contamination on the basis of chemical analyses

PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION

The Cimarron Terrace, in northwestern Oklahoma, was selected
in which to carry out this study.  As shown in Figure 1, the
terrace extends some 110 miles along the north side of the
Cimarron River.  It ranges in width from one to fifteen miles
and ranges up to eighty feet in depth in some of the buried
river channels that it covers.

Numerous towns, a growing number of irrigated farms, and
thousands of households depend on the terrace for their water
supplies.  Because of the importance of the terrace as a
fresh water source in the area and because of the salt water
pollution known to exist, it is well suited for this study.

Considerable work has been done by others which relates to
the project area and has been used to formulate  the design
of this project.

Water well inventories were provided by Gould1 and the State
Mineral Survey by the Works Progress Administration.2  Ground-
water availability was discussed by Locke, Kopp, and Reed3
and in a map-report by the U. S. Geological Survey."
Schwennesen* also discussed availability in a report -on
irrigation.

Renick6 discussed groundwater quality from wells and springs
and Schoff7 discussed both quality and quantity of ground-
water in the terrace deposits.

The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, in cooperation with the
U. S. Geological Survey,8'9 made a detailed study of the

-------
Study  Area
         Figure 1   Location Map showing the  location of the
              dmarron Terrace 1n the State  of Oklahoma

-------
occurrence, quantity and quality of groundwater in both  the
terrace deposits and underlying bedrock.   The study also
discussed the feasibility of withdrawing  large quantities
of water from the terrace for public,  industrial,  and irri-
gation uses.

Renick6 and Kite10'11 published maps showing terrace deposits
in parts of the area and discussed their  lithology, origin,
and thickness.   Clifton12'13 and Clark and Casper14'15  also
addressed terrace deposits in part of  the project  area  by
discussion or inclusion in geologic maps.  Fay16317'18  dis-
cussed the Permian redbeds, Pleistocene sediments  and salt
deposits of the Flowerpot shale formation in part  of the
project area.

The Cimarron River has a total  drainage basin area of 18,922
square miles from its origin in New Mexico to its  confluence
with the Arkansas River.  Less  than 7,000 square miles  lie
within the study area.  The streambed  is  mostly flat and
sandy with dense growths of salt cedar and cottonwood along
its immediate banks.  The river at Guthrie has a 33-year
average annual  flow of 624,560  acre-feet  and ranges from a
maximum of 158,000 cfs to a minimum of 0.1 cfs.

Along the southwest side of the river, the tributaries  drain
from gypsum bluffs across gently rolling  land underlain by
shale.  Most streams flowing from the  southwest are mineral-
ized because of the bedrock formation  over which they flow.
Drainage along  the southwest bank is well developed compared
with drainage along the northeast bank of the river.

Within the study area, the land immediately north  of the
Cimarron River  is marked by sandy soils and drifting wind-
blown sand and  is commonly known as the Cimarron Terrace.
                              7  .

-------
Surface topography is dominated by generally stable sand
dunes close to the river, and by gentle undulating to flat
prairie-like surfaces farther back from the river.  Surface
drainage is generally poor.  Only four streams originating
outside the area flow southward across the terrace to the
river.  These four streams and several smaller streams lying
entirely within the terrace are perennial in their lower
reaches where flow is maintained by seepage from terrace
deposi ts.

The average annual precipitation in the study area ranges
from 30 inches in the southeast to 24 inches in the north-
west.  The poor surface drainage from the terrace, due to
the highly permeable sandy soils, enhances its value as a
fresh water aquifer.   Even though the amount of water in
storage is not great compared with a thicker aquifer, rapid
recharge allows considerable development.

GEOLOGY OF AREA

Surface rocks of northwestern Oklahoma are assigned to the
Permian System.  These rocks form a redbed clastic-and-evaporite
sequence that strikes generally in a northwest direction and
dips gently southwestward about 10 feet per mile.  Outcrop
areas of the bedrock formations and the terrace area are shown
in Figure  2.  Quaternary sediments which comprise the Cimarron
Terrace and the alluvium of the Cimarron River system rest
upon the Permian redbeds.

The Permian formations crop out under and adjacent to the
Cimarron Terrace in northwesterly trending bands with the
oldest formation found at the southeast end of the terrace.

The oldest Permian unit which crops out beneath the Cimarron

-------
D
Alluvium
     Terrace

     Ogalia la

PERMIAN

     Blaine
     Marlow
     Rush Springs
     Cloud Chief

     Flowerpot

     Cedar Hills

     Hennessey

     Garber  &
     Wellington
                 Figure  2   Geologic map  of the dmarron  Terrace Area

-------
Terrace is the Garber formation.  From the east end of the
study area southward, the Garber is red, fine-to-medium grained
sandstone with interbedded siltstones and shales.  Progress-
ing northwesterly, the formations become progressively
younger.  Above the Garber is the Hennessey formation, which
is predominately a red shale with minor siltstone and sand-
stone lenses.  The upper part of the Hennessey becomes in-
creasingly sandy toward the north and northwest becoming the
Cedar Hills member of that formation.  The Cedar Hills is a
reddish-orange, fine-grained quartz sandstone which grades
into shale and siltstone toward the west.  In the subsurface.
the Hennessey grades into an evaporite sequence called the
Cimarron evaporites*8 These evaporites include the Lower
Cimarron salt, Cimarron anhydrite, and the Upper Cimarron
salt.  The eastern extent of these salts passes through the
center of Alfalfa County, across Major County, and along the
western edge of Elaine County.  These evaporites are from
300 to more than 1,000 feet below the surface and attain a
total thickness of more than 1,000 feet.

The El Reno group rests on the Cedar Hills.  This group of
sediments is composed of the Flowerpot shale, Blaine formation
and Dog Creek shale (ascending order)}8 The Flowerpot shale
is a red-colored unit with fine-grained sandstone and siltstone
lenses.   Jordan and Vosburg19 recognize a Flowerpot salt
facies which has an eastern limit that extends across the
western  third of Woods County, and the northwestern corner
of Major County near the northwestern end of the Cimarron
Terrace.  The salt in this area is less than 100 to more
than 500 feet below the surface and can be more than 350
feet thick.   Ward20 suggests that a 57-foot bed of rock salt
(sodium  chloride) occurs beneath the Cimarron River bed near
the northern end of the terrace.  The Blaine formation over-
lies the Flowerpot shale and is an alternating series of

                              10

-------
gypsum (anhydrite in the subsurface),  dolomite and shale.
The Dog Creek shale rests on the Blaine and is reddish-brown,
silty shale which contains interbedded gypsum (anhydrite in
the subsurface).

These Permian redbed-evaporite units that are described in
the above discussion are part of the Cimarron Series and are
more than 2,000 feet thick.   It is within this series of for-
mations that natural salt occurs which, in places, is brought
to the surface by deep percolating groundwater.

Overlying the Dog Creek shale is the Whitehorse group which
is assigned to the Custerian series.18 The Whitehorse con-
sists of the Marlow formation and Rush  Springs sandstone
(ascending).  The Marlow is  an orange, fine-grained sandstone
which contains interbedded dolomite and gypsum.  The Rush
Springs is also an orange sandstone, but lacks the dolomite
and gypsum interbeds.

Overlying all of these Permian units are the unconsolidated
clays, silts, sands, and gravels of the Pleistocene Series
which is assigned to the Quaternary System.  These sediments
form the Cimarron Terrace and range up to 120 feet thick.
These unconsolidated sands and silts were deposited on an
old erosional surface with buried valleys and ridges which,
together with depositional changes from silts and clays to
clean permeable sands, result in a wide range of well yields.
Groundwater in many areas of the Cimarron Terrace is good
fresh water resulting from the infiltration of precipitation
which falls directly on the  terrace.  The groundwater gradient
is generally southward with  discharge to the Cimarron River.

The alluvium of the Cimarron River is also composed of un-
consolidated sands, some gravel, and silt and clay lenses.
                              11

-------
The alluvium, deposited in recent time, ranges in depth up
to 50 feet and in many areas contains water high in salt
content due to recharge by the salty river water during
f1oods.

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION

Within the study area, two sources of sodium chloride pollution
are known to exist.  The first consists of bodies of natural
salt (halite) deposited as lenses in the Flowerpot shale
formation which outcrops in the northwestern part of the
study area.  Lenses of halite are common in the Flowerpot18
shale but most of these within 600 feet of the surface have
been dissolved by percolating groundwater.  Occasionally,
however, salt deposits still exist such as those constituting
the Little and Big Salt Plains at the northwestern end of
the Cimarron Terrace.  The river acquires most of its salt
load while flowing across this halite lense.

High sulfates are also characteristic of the Cimarron River
water.   The sulfates are derived from the gypsum and dolomite
layers  of the Blaine gypsum which overlies the Flowerpot
shale.

The second source of contamination is caused by man.  Figure 3
shows   that many complaints, by residents of the area, have
been filed with the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.  A
majority of these complaints have originated where oil and
gas production is located in areas underlain by the more
permeable part of the terrace near the river and where
groundwater is more intensively developed.  Oil and gas fields
developed in recent years have caused fewer complaints because
of more rigid safeguards against contamination.

                              12

-------
ra
Cimarron
  Terrace
    Oil or
     Gas Field
              Figure 3  Number of salt water pol1ution  complaints per township  and
                              locations of  oil  and  gas fields

-------
In the past, salt water separated from oil  and gas was dis-
posed of in large "evaporation" pits.  Although some pits
were correctly constructed of impervious material, or imper-
viously-lined, others were simply dug into  permeable terrace
sands allowing brines to percolate downward and contaminate
the aquifer.

Numerous pits were used in this area between 1930 and 1950
when oil production was at its peak and before salt water
disposal was effectively controlled.  A great deal of the
salt water contamination in the terrace is  believed to be
a result of pit disposal with the most widespread contami-
nation being southwest of Crescent with other occurrences
being much more limited in extent.

The locations of all waste disposal facilities now in use
in the terrace are shown in Figure 4.

PROJECT THEORY

Surface resistivity methods and sodium/chloride ratios were
selected to delineate salt water contamination and to identify
the source of such contamination, respectively.

Present methods for making electrical soundings, now referred
to as surface resistivity, have evolved over several decades
of use in the fields of groundwater exploration, mining,
engineering, geology, and oil  exploration.   Selected references
are listed at the back of this book.  The few attempts to
use surface resistivity to delineate salt water-fresh water
interfaces have shown promise in previous work but have not
been consistently successful  because of complicating geologic
conditions.  No known previously published  reports are avail-
able of work using surface resistivity to delineate salt water
in terrace deposits.
                              14

-------
o
Solid Wastes

Industrial
   Waste
   Disposal
   Well

Salt Water
   Disposal
   Well

Salt Water
   Flood  Area
      •lies
                 Figure 4  Waste  disposal facilities in the Cimarron  Terrace

-------
Electric resistivity is a surface exploration tool  long recog-
nized and used in subsurface geologic exploration.   The method
employs a battery-powered instrument that forces a  current to
flow through the ground between two outer electrodes driven
1  to 2 feet into the ground, and measures the potential drop
between two inner electrodes.   One of the factors that can
cause differences in resistivity is the salinity of the
groundwater.  A schematic of the electrode array is shown in
Figure 5.
llll
— Tt*T
Lrf A

l
( A )



\ / 1
GROUND SURFACE

    Figure 5  Schematic of electrical  surface resistivity
                             16

-------
By moving the electrodes  farther  apart  but  keeping  the  "A"
spacing (distance between electrodes)  equal  for  each  reading,
it is possible to evaluate changes  in  resistance to electrical
flow, hence changes in earth materials, at  increasing depths.
The Wenner configuration  (equal  "A" spacing)  was used for  all
the resistivity stations  on this  project.   The electrical
resistance of earth materials is  affected  primarily by the
moisture content of the earth matrix and the conductivity  of
the water.  Sands generally have  a  much higher resistivity
than do clays mainly due  to the relative quantity of water
in these soil types.

A dry sandy soil has a high resistance, a  sandy soil  saturated
with water containing a low concentration  of soluble salts
has relatively a medium resistance, and a  sandy soil  contain-
ing water with a high concentration of salts and clayey soils
have a relatively low resistance  to electric current.

Therefore, an electrical  depth sounding should delineate the
depth to the water surface in a water-table sand aquifer and
should also reflect the dissolved solids content of the water
in a vertically simple geologic environment, an electrical
traverse of this nature should give information regarding
lateral changes in water quality.  Of  course, in nature,
the geologic environment is rarely ideally simple vertically
and certainly not constant laterally,  so that interpretation
of resistivity data is usually quite complex.

Of the numerous interpretive methods available, two were
selected as most applicable for determining a lateral change
in water quality in a shallow aquifer.  The first method
is simply  to plot the apparent resistivity values at a
given  "A"  spacing at  each  station  and  to contour the lateral
changes.   The electrical properties of  the near surface

                              17

-------
materials have a much greater effect on the total resistivity
measured than the material at the depth equal to the "A"
spacing,approximately double the depth of interest.  The
water table, in that part of the terrace studied intensively,
averages about 20 feet below the surface, and the depth of
the terrace averages about 40 feet; therefore, an "A" spacing
of 80 feet was selected for the apparent resistivity map.

The second interpretation method is considerably more complex.
First, the apparent resistivity data at a given station was
corrected by a computer program using an unpublished tech-
nique developed by Keck Consulting Services,  Inc.  By using
this technique each successive resistivity measured, as the
"A" spacing is increased at a given station,  is corrected to
adjust for the re's i st I vi t ies of overlying materials.  The
corrected resistivity values were then used in the Barnes
layer equation21 (again by computer program to obtain Barnes
layer values).  In order to facilitate the use of this method,
the "A" spacings were increased in 4-foot increments during
the field work.  The "A" spacing was increased to gain deeper
penetration, but the space between electrodes was always
equal  for a given setting.  As a result, Barnes layer values
were obtained for each 4-foot layer of soil.

An inherent problem in interpreting surface resistivity data
is the fact that surface soils and subsurface geologic strata
change laterally,  especially in an alluvial  or terrace geo-
logic  environment.   In addition, buried pipelines, ground
currents induced by overhead transmission lines, and wire
fences (all  common  in  the study area)  cause lateral changes
in electrical  properties which are difficult to differen-
tiate  from vertical  changes.   In order to minimize this
problem, readings  were frequently made first on the left set
                              18

-------
then on the right set of the four electrodes  by  using  a  fifth
electrode in the center.  This procedure,  called Lee  partition-
ing, is useful  in identifying large lateral  changes.

Where lateral  changes in resistivity occur they  sometimes
result in "backups" in the data which especially affects the
Barnes layer calculations.  Normally the resistivity  values
decrease with  depth (as the "A" spacing is increased).  Lateral
changes can cause a given resistivity value to be larger than
the shallower  value.   When this "backup" occurs, then the  Barnes
layer value becomes negative and the technique is not valid.
Even though the Lee partitioning technique was extensively
employed during the field work, numerous instances were
encountered in which "backups" resulted, making  the Barnes
layer method less useful.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A number of steps were taken to establish an information base
to be used in  selecting specific areas of investigation for
this project.

In addition to examining the files of state agencies  to locate
previously known areas of chloride contamination, well pub-
licized public hearings were held  in several towns within
the terrace to obtain current and  historical data on  chloride
pollution and  to acquaint residents with the project.

Water samples  were obtained from several locations along the
Cimarron River and analyzed for chlorides.  As  shown  in
Figure 6, a profile of water quality was constructed  along
the river.  The slight  increase in chloride and large increase
in specific conductance near Dover results from high  sulfate
water entering the river  from the  south and not from the
terrace.
                              19

-------
         Specific conductance
            micromhos
20,000
                                                 Chlorides in  mg/1-
      Freedom
          Waynoka
Cteo Springs
     Isabella
Lacey    Dover(2)      Crescent
                       Guthrie
       Figure 6   Profile of  water  quality of  the  Cimarron River
                                      20

-------
The results of these preliminary studies showed  that  the
most extensive contamination exists in the Crescent area,  and
the second most extensive contamination exists  near Dover.
These areas are shown in Figure 7.   Several  isolated  domestic
and stock wells showing chloride contamination  were located
during this project but were not extensively studied.

Specific conductance of samples collected from  existing water
wells served as a general guide in locating surface resistivity
profiles.  In the Crescent area resistivity measurements  were
made at 162 stations, compared to 12 in the Dover area.  Much
of the resistivity was done prior to test drilling and served
as a guide in locating test hole locations.  Additional
resistivity work was done during test drilling  phases of the
project at those locations so that correlations could be
made.

A total of 125 test holes were drilled mainly in the Crescent
and Dover areas.  Fifty of these holes were cased to permit
water sampling while in others borehole resistivity logs were
run in order to estimate water quality.   Some wells were
drilled only for geologic control.  Permanent monitoring
stations were established at 34 sites.

The test drilling program provided a control for surface
resistivity measurements as well as providing data for bed-
rock contour and chloride maps in  the  Crescent and Dover
areas.
                               21

-------
IV)
                                                 mil**
                      Figure 7  Areas of major  pollution in the Cimarron Terrace

-------
                         DISCUSSION

WATER QUALITY

The area southwest of Crescent,  near the southeast end of the
Cimarron Terrace, is the most extensive area of salt water
contamination in the terrace.  Groundwater,  which was once
fresh, has been rendered unfit for human consumption in a
nine square-mile area.

Figure 8 shows the surface geology in the Crescent area where
the terrace is extensive and potentially a significant water
source.  Figure 9 shows the locations of pre-existing wells
and the test holes drilled under this project.  Details of the
wells and test holes are listed in Appendix  A.  The bedrock
surface on which the terrace materials were  deposited is very
irregular showing the effects of erosion.  The bedrock con-
tour map shown in Figure 10 depicts this surface as inter-
preted from test hole data, and Figure 11 shows the thickness
of the terraced deposits as determined from  the bedrock con-
tour map and the surface contour map.  The orientation of the
buried alluvial valleys plus groundwater gradients shown on
Figure 12 provide important information regarding the direction
and rate of movement of salt water in the terrace.

Water samples were obtained from most of the existing wells
in the Crescent area and from some of the test holes.  Details
of the analyses of these samples are tabulated in Appendix B.
Figure 13, 14, and 15 are interpretive maps  showing the dis-
tribution of chlorides, total dissolved solids, and specific
conductance.  These maps show a consistent high concentration
of contaminated water in section 34 with somewhat less con-
taminated water extending northward into section 27.
                              23

-------
&&>M$v^-^i^^
±£^££££&&^
                                                  fj
       •I lei
         tiljTerrace
D
Alluvium
Bedrock
         Figure 8  Geologic map -  Crescent Area
                         24

-------
                   R4W
                      •Test hole
                      °Domestic or Stock
                     ©Irrigation
                     ® Municipal or Industrial
                     fflObservation well
                     <* Abandoned well
Figure 9   Well  locations  -  Crescent Area
                    25

-------
Figure 10  Bedrock contour map- Crescent Area
 (contour interval = 10 feet)
              26

-------
Figure 11   Isopach map - Crescent Area
    (thickness of terrace deposits)
      (Contour interval  =  10  ft.)
                  27

-------
                        R4W
     •IIM
Figure 12  Water table contour map - Crescent Area
            (contour interval = 10 feet)
                        28

-------
          •rito*
 iilO-500mg/l
r/1500-iQoo
                                   11000-2000
                                   |2000-5000
                                 ^115000-10000
                                    >  10000

Figure 13   Chloride content  of groundwater  -  Crescent Area
                              29

-------

•Hm
                                 i^J 0-500 mg/1

                                    500-1000

                                    1000-2000

                                    2000-5000

                                 IU 5000-10000

                                 Hi >   10000

Figure 14  Total  dissolved solids  in  the  shallow groundwater
                         Crescent Area
                   30

-------
            »HM                     twil 0-500 umhos
                                      1500-1000
                                      I1000-2000
                                      12000-5000
                                   till 5000-10000
                                   • >  10000
Figure 15   Specific conductance of  groundwater -  Crescent Area
                                31

-------
The Dover-Hennessey area is also in the southeast part of
the terrace, about 17 miles west of the Crescent area.  The
extent of the terrace and underlying bedrock outcrops are
shown in Figure 16.  In this area, the Permian redbed formation
underlying the terrace is the Cedar Hills member of the
Hennessey shale.  Southward, the Cedar Hills is composed
mainly of red-to-brown siltstone with only a few sandy lenses.

As in the Crescent area, the bedrock surface in the Dover
area underwent considerable erosion prior to the deposition
of the terrace sands and silts.  The locations of all wells
used for control of the various interpretive maps is shown
in Figure 17.  Based on logs of existing domestic, irrigation
and municipal wells, and test drilling done under this project,
a contour map of the bedrock surface was prepared as shown on
Figure 18.  This map reflects the buried bedrock valleys and
ridges which greatly influence the flow of groundwater.
Generally, the terrace deposits consist of coarse clean sands
in the bedrock channels and fine sands and silts on the
ridges and high on the channel flanks.  The water table con-
tour map, Figure 19, reflects the influence of the bedrock
channels and depositional pattern of the terrace deposits.
A trough in the water table extending southeast from Section
30, Twp 18N, Rge 6W, shows a linearity in permeability which
corresponds with the bedrock channel along the same alignment.

The distribution of the chlorides in the Dover-Hennessey area
is shown on Figure 20, and the total dissolved solids are
shown in Figure 21.  Nearly all of the high chlorides are
from domestic wells which were drilled below the terrace
materials and into the Permian bedrock.  Although consider-
able oil well drilling has taken place in this area, all of
the wells have been drilled since 1960 and "evaporation" pits
were not used for the disposal of salt water.
                              32

-------
  si
     Terrace
D
Alluvium
Bedrock
Figure 16  Geologic map  - Dover Area




                 33

-------
• Test  hole          ©Municipal or Industrial
oDomestic or Stock  [•)Observation well
©Irrigation         -e'Abandoned well
Figure  17  Well  locations - Dover  Area
                   34

-------
Figure 18  Bedrock contour map - Dover Area
       (contour interval = 10 feet)
                    35

-------
i * to to •

       Figure 19  Water table contours - Dover Area
                (contour interval = 10 feet)
                            36

-------
   i££j 0-50C mg/l
       500-1000
       1000-2000
   2000-5000
LU 5000-10000
Figure  20   Chlorides  -  Dover Area
                 37

-------
              0-500 mg/1
              5no-iono
              .oor-?nnf
2000-5000
5000-10000
Figure 21   Total  dissolved solids  -  Dover Area
                       38

-------
Two test holes were drilled  in  the  buried  alluvial  valley  in
the southwest quarter of section  20 in  the Dover-Hennessey
area.   A 140-foot well  was completed in bedrock by  cementing
the casing to a depth of 66  feet  sealing off the terrace
water.  A water sample  obtained from the bedrock contained
1,074  ppm chlorides.  A second  well drilled nearby  but
screened near the bottom of  the terrace sands at 65 feet,
produced water containing only  143  ppm  chlorides.   Static
water  levels in the two wells were  measured to be  at the same
elevation.  If salt water from  seepage  pits had entered the
terrace it should have  been  present in  the bottom  of the
alluvial channel at the location  of this test hole.

The above test well data and the  sodium/chloride ratio (see
page 37) establishes that the source of the salt water in
the Dover-Hennessey area is  from  natural sources in the
Permian redbed formations.  Further, it may be predicted
that if large withdrawals are made  from the terrace lower-
ing the hydrostatic head in that aquifer, salt water from
the underlying redbeds may flow upward causing local increases
in chlorides.

RESISTIVITY

It was  found that the reliability  of surface resistivity
techniques is directly associated  with the complexity of  the
geology.  Figure 22 shows the  locations of all resistivity
stations  in the Crescent area  and  apparent resistivities  are
tabulated in Appendix A,  Table A-4.

At station 34-5, for example,  the  geology  is very  simple,
consisting of a  three layer  system of  dry  sand, wet sand,  and
the redbeds.  Figure 23  shows  a comparison of  the  lithology,
borehole  resistivity, apparent resistivity,  and Barnes  layer

                               39

-------
                               R4W
      ©
©
                                             CRESCENT
                     M-I ai-t n-i   n-«
                                            1TTT
                                                 • L>-«
                                                M« Iftt-t
                                                                 T
                                                                 17
                                                                 N
           •liw
Figure  22  Locations of resistivity  stations -  Crescent  Area
                                40

-------
DEPTH-"A" Spocino
                                        BOREHOLE LO8 DEPTH
   BARNES    7
   LAYER  ,	->
   VALUES
      "BOREHOLE  RESISTIVITY L°6
                          SURFACE APPARENT  RESISTIVITY
                                                            CHLORIDES IN

                                                            GROUND WATER

                                                            = ISOOO ••/!
                     *'.'•:

                     fe
                                                                             \g
                                                                              ».'
                                                        900
                                                                    •00
           100
200         MO
  BOHE-HOLE RESISTIVITY
                                             400
900
                                                                    •00
                        StAFMX RE9STIVITY (Station 34-S
                        BORE HOLE GEOLOGIC LOG  07N.4W,
                        BORE HOLE RESISTIVITY LOO	
                             34ekkl)
             Figure  23    Plot  of  Station  Data  -  34-5
                                       41

-------
values.  Specifically, the apparent resistivity of "A" spacing
(depth) of 80 feet is low (about 60 ohm-feet), the borehole
resistivity at a depth of the coarse sand is low (about 50
ohm-feet), and the Barnes layer values in the coarse sand are
low (about 25 ohm-feet).  These low values are to be expected
because of the high chloride content of 15,000 mg/1.

Figure 24 shows resistivity results of station 21-2.  It is
comparable to Figure 23 except that Barnes layer values are
not usable due to "backup", and the chloride concentration was
only 51 mg/1.  As expected, both the surface resistivity and
borehole resistivity were higher than the previous example.
Specifically, at a depth of 80 feet, the surface resistivity
exceeds 300 ohm-feet, and the borehole resistivity reaches
480 ohm-feet within the coarse sand layer.  The low chloride
water results in significantly higher resistivity values when
compared with Figure 23.  It should be noted that surface
resistivity very clearly shows the location of both the water
table and the redbeds.   As in the previous example,  the geology
of this location is relatively simple, consisting predominately
of sand with only a thin silt layer present.

The two examples shown  in Figure 23 and 24 demonstrate that
surface resitivity does perform well in a geologically simple
environment and gives the expected results according to the
basic theory on which the method is founded.

A third example is shown in Figure 25, station 22-1, where
the terrace is composed primarily of silt and clay.   At this
station, the apparent resistivity is about 50 ohm-feet, and
the Barnes layer value  just above bedrock is about 12 ohm-
feet.   In addition, the borehole resistivity is only about
50 ohm-feet, just above bedrock.  The low values are about
equivalent to the values shown in Figure  23 in a salty area,

                              42

-------
DEPTH - "A" Spacing
BORE HOLE LOG  DEPTH
                  0
                            BORE HOLE RESISTIVITY
                                             SURFACE  RESISTIVITY
                                                             CHLORIDES

                                                             IN 6ROUND

                                                             WATER*
                      3o
                   APWRENT RE38TIVITY
                   NOT SHOWN  BECAUSE OF BACK-UP (SM Twt)

                   BARNES LAYER RESMTIVITY
                   BORE HOLE  RESttTIVITY
                   SUVACE RESBTIVirT (Stvtiwi tl-Z)
                   BORE HOLE •EOLOOK LOB fl7N,4W,mi)
                   BORE HOLE RESISTIVITY  LOB
            Figure  24   Plot  of  Station  Data  -  21-2
                                     43

-------
                                                        BORE HOLE  LOS DEPTH
                                                                         0
                                  N BORE  HOLE  RESISTIVITY  LOG
                                  j
          BARNES

          LAYER  x
          VALUES f
                 \.
                                    SURFACE APPARENT  RESISTIVITY
                                                        CHLORIDES  IN

                                                        AREA  LESS

                                                        THAN IOO»t/l
ao-
            so
                       APPARENT  RE5ISTIWTY  (o»im-f««^
                                               290
           300
   0

   5"
100
           BARNES LAYER  RESISTIVITY (o»nMh«t)
                                    400
500
COO
            too
            200          30O
           BORE HOLE RESISTIVITY
                                                           5OO
            GOO
                        SURFACE RESISTIVITY (Station 22-1)
                        BOREHOLE GEOLOGIC LOG (17 N, 4 W, 21 Cl)
                        •ORE HOLE RESISTIVITY LOG	
              Figure  25   Plot  of  Station  Data -  22-1
                                      44

-------
however, water quality in  the  vicinity  of  Figure  25  is  low  in
chlorides.   The low resistivity  values  are caused by the
presence of silt and clay.

At other stations,  it was  noted  that where a  significantly
thick clay layer was present above a fresh water  sand,  surface
resistivity values  were low.  It is concluded that where  sig-
nificant clay layers are present in a sand aquifer,  it  is
difficult to differentiate between the  clay and the  brackish
water in the sand using surface  resistivity.

Figure 26 is an interpretive map in the Crescent  area on
apparent resistivities at the 80-foot "A"  spacings.   Figure 27
is an interpretive map based on  the Barnes layer  values at  the
bottom of the terrace material just above  bedrock.  It  should
be noted that both of these maps show areas of very low
resistivity in sections 34 and 27 comparable to the areas
of high chlorides.   Generally, the resistivity maps correlate
well with water quality maps except that,  in areas where the
terrace deposits contain significant clay, the resistivity
maps show moderately low values  even though the water quality
is good.

For example, the relatively low resistivity values  shown on
both the Barnes layer and apparent resistivity maps in the
northern and northeastern part of  the area reflect  a thinning
of the  terrace and areas of predominately clay and  silt depo-
sition.  Because of the clay and  silt, low resistivities were
recorded even  though the water quality is good.

The Barnes  layer interpretive method appears to  present a
slightly more  accurate  reflection  of salt content than does
the apparent  resistivity map.  The moderately  high  chlorides
in  the  southeast corner of  section  30, in the  southeast
                               45

-------
                                50-100

                             iiiJ25-50

                                 25

Figure 26  Surface resistivity  - apparent  resistivity
           at 80 feet - Crescent Area
                          46

-------
      ©
Figure 27  Surface resistivity -
- Crescent Area
                             47

-------
corner of section 33, and in the western part of section 35
were reflected by the Barnes layer resistivity values, whereas
the apparent resistivity interpretive map does not show those
details.

It should also be noted that the southeasterly trending good
quality water feature in sections 28 and 34 observable on all
three water quality maps is also observable on both of the
resistivity interpretive maps.  This indentation into the con-
taminated zone is caused by fresh water flowing southeastward
from  section 28  into section 34 down the buried channel shown
on Figure 10.

In conclusion, surface  resistivity  has  been demonstrated to
effectively delineate areas of  salt water contamination in
areas where lateral  changes in  surface  resistivity values
are  caused  by lateral changes  in water  salinity.  However,
where other subsurface  conditions exist, such  as variation
in  clay content   which  also affect  the  resistivity values,
the  effectiveness of surface  resistivity Is decreased.
Surface resistivity  should  be  effective for  delineating salt
water contamination  In  most geologic  environments where
 lateral changes  other  than  salt concentration   in  the sub-
 surface are minimal.

 SODIUM/CHLORIDE  RATIO

 According to  Leonard2*  a sodium/chloride ratio above 0.6  is
 considered  typical  of  natural  brines  emerging from  halite
 beds found  in the Flowerpot formation whereas ratios below
 0.5 are considered typical  of oil  field brines.

 Analyses of brines discharged into disposal  pits (Table A-3)
 averages about  150,000 mg/1 chloride whereas the highest

                               48

-------
concentration found in terrace groundwater (near Crescent)
is 15,000 mg/1.  These oil field brines have a sodium/chloride
ratio of 0.37, and the contaminated groundwater has a ratio
of 0.38.  Natural salt water springs at the northwest end of
the terrace have a sodium/chloride ratio of 0.62.  The fact
that salt water in the terrace has a sodium/chloride ratio
nearly identical with that of the oil field brines greatly
supports the argument that the source of the water is via
the disposal pits.

Examination of the chemical analyses of samples containing
over 250 ppm chlorides in the Dover-Hennessey area shows that
sodium/chloride ratios are mostly about 0.66 (several anom-
alous ratios of 0.1 or less may be due to lab error).  Only
a few have ratios in the 0.3 range common in the oil  field
brines in this area.  The brine fingerprinting evidence and
the fact that high chlorides are found mainly in wells com-
pleted into bedrock suggest that the source of the chlorides
is from the Permian redbeds.

AQUIFER RESTORATION

A large abandoned "evaporation" pit is located in the south-
east corner of section 28, near Crescent, in an area  under-
lain by moderately salty water, and other pits are believed
to have been located in the southern part of section  22.
However, water with the highest salt concentration lies to
the south and southeast in the general  direction of flow.
The following estimate is made of the rate at which the
salt water is moving toward the Cimarron River.
                              49

-------
               v = .
                   7.48 E
     where
v = velocity in feet per day

P = permeability of terrace, estimated
    to be 400 gpd/ft2

I = hydraulic gradient = 6xlO~3  (Figure  12)

E = porosity of terrace sand,  estimated
    to be 0.3
               v =  (400)  (0.006]
               •   7^=7A n \  IX	v i '
                    (1.48) (0.3)    = ] foot Per day or 365
                                     feet per year

The pit was used between about 1930 and 1950, therefore, after
allowing 5 years for  the salt to percolate downward into the
aquifer, the main body of salt water should be between about
7,000 and 14,000 feet to the southeast of the pit in the
direction of groundwater  flow as shown on Figure 12.  How-
ever, the chloride map (Figure 13) shows that the main body
of salty water is located only 4,000 to 6,000 feet southeast
from the abandoned pit.

It is apparent from the foregoing discussions that the con-
centrated brine discharged into the evaporation pits has
been continuously diluted by the natural groundwater  flow
through the terrace.  The residual high chlorides are con-
tinuing to be flushed out of the terrace and into the Cimarron
River,  however, the rate of flushing is apparently about
one-half the estimated rate of flow of the groundwater.
Assuming that future  groundwater  withdrawals do not sig-
nificantly change the groundwater  gradient, it may be
estimated that approximately 100 additional years will be
                              50

-------
required for the salt water to be flushed out of the terrace
aquifer south of Crescent.
                              51

-------
                          REFERENCES
 2


 3
 4


 5
 7


 8,
10
11
12
Gould, C. N.  Geology and Water Resources of Oklahoma.
U. S. Geological Survey Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper
#148. 1905.

State Mineral Survey.  Reports prepared by the Works Pro-
gress Administration for Oklahoma Geological Survey. 1936

Reed, E. W., J. L. Mogg, J. E. Barclay, and G. H. Peden.
Ground Water Resources of the Terrace Deposits Along the
Northeast Side of the Cimarron River in Alfalfa, Garfield
Kingfisher, and Major Counties, Oklahoma.  Oklahoma Plan-
ning and Resources Board, Division of Water Resources
Bulletin No. 9. 1952.

Miser, H. D.  Geologic Map of Oklahoma.  Oklahoma Geolog-
ical Survey and U. S. Geological  Survey. 1954.
Schwennesen,
nity of Enid
Supply Paper
A. T.  Ground
 Oklahoma.   U
345-B.  1914.
Water for Irrigation in the Vici
 S.  Geological  Survey Water-
Renick, B. C.  Additional Ground Water Supplies for the
City of Enid, Oklahoma.  U.  S. Geological Survey Water-
Supply Paper 520-B. 1924.

Schoff, S. L.  Ground Water in Kingfisher County, Oklahoma
Oklahoma Geological Survey Mineral Report #19. 1949.

Appraisal  of Water and Related Land Resources of Oklahoma,
Region IX.  Oklahoma Water Resources Board Publication 36.
1971.
     Appraisal
     Region X.
     1972.
          of Water and Related Land Resources of Oklahoma,
           Oklahoma Water Resources Board Publication 40.
Kite, W. C.  Oil and Gas in Oklahoma:  Kingfisher and
Canadian Counties.   Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin
40-0. 1927.

Kite, W. C.  Oil and Gas in Oklahoma.  Kingfisher and
Canadian Counties.   Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin
40.  Volume 2. pp. 193-201.  1930.

Clifton, R. L.  Oil  and Gas in Oklahoma:   Woods, Alfalfa,
Harper, Major, Woodward, and Ellis Counties.  Oklahoma
Geological Survey Bulletin  40-A. 1926.
                               52

-------
                       REFERENCES (cont.)

13.   Clifton, R.  L.   Oil  and Gas in Oklahoma:   Woods,  Alfalfa,
     Harper, Major,  Woodward, and Ellis Counties.   Oklahoma
     Geological  Survey Bulletin 40. Volume 2.  pp.  1-20.  1930.

14.   Clark, G.  C., and C.  L. Casper.   Oil  and  Gas  in Oklahoma:
     Oil  and Gas  Geology  of Kay, Grant, Garfield,  and  Noble
     Counties.   Oklahoma  Geological Survey Bulletin 40-H.  1927.

15.   Clark, G.  C., and C.  L. Casper.   Oil  and  Gas  in Oklahoma:
     Oil  and Gas  Geology  of Kay, Grant, Garfield,  and  Noble
     Counties.   Oklahoma  Geological Survey Bulletin 40.  Volume
     2.  pp. 67-104.  1930.

16.   Fay, R. 0.   Geology  and Mineral  Resources of  Blaine County,
     Oklahoma.   Oklahoma  Geological Survey Bulletin 89.  1962.

17.   Fay, R. 0.   The Blaine and Related Formations of North-
     western Oklahoma and  Southern Kansas.  Oklahoma Geological
     Survey Bulletin 98.  1964.

18.   Fay, R. 0.   The Geology and Mineral Resources of Woods
     County, Oklahoma.  Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin
     106. 1965.

19.   Jordan, L.,  and D. L. Vosburg,  Permian Salt  and Assoc-
     iated Evaporites in  the Anadarko Basin in the Western
     Oklahoma-Texas  Panhandle Region.  Oklahoma Geological
     Survey Bulletin 102.  1963.

20.   Ward, P. E.   Shallow Halite Deposits in Northern Woodward
     and Southern Woods Counties, Oklahoma.  Oklahoma Geolog-
     ical Survey, Oklahoma Geology Notes. Volume 21. 1961.

21.   Barnes, H.   Soil Investigation Employing  a New Method of
     Layer/Value Determination for Earth Resistivity Interpre-
     tation.  Highway Research Board Bulletin  65.  p. 26. 1952.

22.   Leonard, A.  R., and  P. E. Ward.   Use of Na/Cl Ratios to
     Distinguish Oil-Field from Salt Spring Brines in Western
     Oklahoma.   U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper
     450-B. p.  126-127. 1962.
                               53

-------
                    ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
Bays, C.   Use of Electrical  Geophysical  Methods  in  Ground  Water
Supply.  Illinois Geological  Surveys Circular 122.  35 pp.  1946.

Foster,  J., and M. Buhle.   An Integrated Geophysical and  Geo-
logical  Investigation of Aquifers in Glacial Drift  near Cham-
paign-Urbana, Illinois.  Econ.  Geol. Volume 46.  p.  367. 1951.

Frohlich, R. K.  Methods of Determining Aquifer  Storage Capacity
and Fresh-Saline Water Interfaces by Geoelectrical  Investi-
gation.   Missouri Water Resources Research Center,  University
of Missouri, Project No. A-046-Mo. 1972.

Gish, 0. H.  Improved Equipment for Measuring Earth Current
Potentials and Earth Resistivity. National Research Council
Bulletin Volume  II, Pt. 2. No,  56. 1926.

Green, D. A.  Permian and Pennsylvania Sediments Exposed,  in
Central and West  Central Oklahoma.  American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Bulletin Volume 20. 1936.

Green, D. A.  Major Divisions of  Permian in Oklahoma and
Southern
Bulletin
Kansas
Volume
  American
21.  1937
Association of Petroleum Geologists
Ground Water  in  the Cimarron River Basin:  New Mexico,
Colorado,  Kansas,  and Oklahoma.  Report  prepared  by U. S.
Geological  Survey  for U.  S. Army Corps of  Engineers.  1966
 Hobson,  G. ,  et  al
 physical  Methods.
 p.  1073.  1962.
           Aquifer Exploration in Canada
          Jour. Amer. Water Works Assoc.
                                  by Geo-
                                   Volume 54
 Malott,  D.,   The  Application  of  Shallow  Geophysical  Explora-
 tion  by  the  Michigan  State  Highway  Department.   Office  of
 Testing  and  Research,  Report  TS10.  29  pp.  1965.
 Meiday,  T.
 Geophysics
   An Electrical
   Volume 25. p.
          Resistivity Survey
          1077. 1960.
                  for Groundwater,
 Soil  Survey,  Alfalfa  County,  Oklahoma.   U.  S.  Department of
 Agriculture,  Bureau  of Chemistry and  Soils.  Series  1933.
 No.  23,  1939.
 Soil  Survey,
 Agriculture,
 Series 1939,
    Woods County, Oklahoma.  U.
    Bureau of  Plant  Ind.,  Soils,
    No. 7. 1950.
                         S. Department of
                          and Agr. Eng.
                               54

-------
                ADDITIONAL REFERENCES (cont.)

Soil Survey, Kingfisher County, Oklahoma.  U. S. Department
of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Series 1959, No. 12,
1962.

Soil Survey, Woodward County, Oklahoma.   U. S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,  Series 1960, No.  6.
1963.

Soil Survey, Garfield County, Oklahoma.   U. S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.  1967.

Soil Survey, Blaine County, Oklahoma.  U. S.  Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.  1968.

Soil Survey, Major County, Oklahoma.   U.  S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.  1968.

Thornthwaite, C.  W.   Atlas of Climatic Types  in the United
States, 1900-39.   U. S.  Department of Agriculture,  Misc.
Publication 421.  (pi. 3).  1941 .
                              55

-------
          SELECTED REFERENCES -  SURFACE  RESISTIVITY

Deppermann, K.,  et al.   The Geoelectrical  Method  in  Applied
Geophysics.  In:   Lehrbuch der Angewandten Geologie,  Bd.  1,
Bentz, A.  (ed.).  Stuttgart, Enke Verlag, p.  718.  1961.

Dobrin, M.,  Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting.   McGraw-
Hill Company. 446 pp.  1960.

Griffiths, D.,  and R.  King.  Applied Geophysics for  Engineers
and Geologists.   Pergamon Press. 223 pp.,  paperback.  1966.

Moore, R.  W.  An Empirical Method of Interpretation  of Earth
Resistivity Measurement.  Trans. Amer.   Inst. Min. Eng.  Volume
164. p. 197. 1944.

Orellana, E., and H. M. Mooney.  Master Tables and Curves for
Vertical Electrical Sounding over Layered Structures.   Inter-
ciencia. Costanilla de Los Angeles 15.  Madrid. 34pp  + tables.
1966.

Van Dam, J., and J. Meulenkamp.  Some Results of the Geo-
electrical Resistivity Method in Groundwater Investigations
in  the Netherlands.  Geophysical Prospecting. Volume 15.
p.  92-115. 1967.

Van Nostrand, R., and K.  Cook.  Interpretation of Resistivity
Data.  U.  S. Geological  Survey  Professional Paper 499. 310 pp.
1966.

Wenner, Frank.   Method of  Measuring Earth Resistivity.  U. S.
Bureau of  Standards, Scientific Paper No. 258. Volume 12,
No. 3. 1915-16.

Wessels, G.  Groundwater  Studies by the Electrical Resistivity
Method in  the Big Creek  Region  of Ontario.  Guelph University
School of  Agricultural  Engineering, Engineering  Technology
Publication  12.  27  pp.  1965.

Zohdy, Adel  A. R.,  and  Dallas B. Jackson.   Recognition of
Natural Brine by Electrical  Soundings near  the Salt Fork of
the Brazos  River,  Kent  and Stonewall Counties, Texas. U. S.
Geological  Survey  Professional  Paper 809-A.  14 pp.  1973.
                                56

-------
                         APPENDIX  A





Explanatory page about well numbering system





Table A-l   Water Well Data





Table A-2   Water Quality Data





Table A-3   Water Quality Data - Oil  Field Brines





Table A-4   Resistivity Stations





Table A-5   Lithologic Logs
                              57

-------
                    WELL NUMBERING  SYSTEM

The well numbering system used  in the  following tables is
based on the Bureau of Land Management system of land sub-
division.   In the location system the  first digit of a well
number  indicates the township,  the  second the range, and the
third the section in which the  well  is located.  The first
uppercase letter denotes the quarter section (160-acre tract),
the second  the quarter-quarter  section (40-acre tract), and
the third the quarter-quarter-quarter  section (10-acre tract).
Within  each 10-acre tract the wells  are numbered serially as
indicated by the final digit of the  number.  Thus, in Beaver
County, the number 1N26E-5DDC1  indicates that the well is in
the SW%SEJsSE% Section 5, Township IN, Range 26ECM as shown
below:
         R26E
Sec 5


T
1
N




6
7
i e
1 9
30
3 1


•^







^








^




1 e e
1 c a

\






1
12
13s
24
25
36


                         1N-26E-5DDC1
                                                      I
                                                        B
                                            — B	1	A--H
Sections within a township          Subdivisions within a section
Figure 28  Diagram showing we!1-numbering system used in Oklahoma
                              58

-------
Table A-l    WATER WELL DATA
              59

-------
                                       Table A-l.  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
lace
ladb
2aaa
2aba
2acc
2bab
2bbdl
2bbb2
2bbbl
2cac
3aab
3aab
3 ebb
3bbd
3bbb
3bcc
3cdc
3dac
4abb2
4aba
4aac
4baa
4bbc
4ddc
5bbb


Use'1'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIA
D
D
S
0
D
D
0
D
D
0
D
0

0
0
0
0
0
A
S
0
0
D
0
S


9
8


1%
6
6

7
4^
6




4



1*



30
37
62
95
90
65
45
56
43

36
41
67





57
50

55







1963

1973
1968

1973
1972
1973

1972
1973
1972
1972
1972

1954
1972
1972

1972

Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
N MERID



70


45


16
30


69
60
51
37
17


48
60
40
42

Saturated
(ft)
IAN






24






40







60



Water Level
Date




10-24-72
8-16-72


5-30-73
10-24-72
8-5-73


6-12-73
6-18-71





8-3-71
8-10-71

3-14-73


10-25-72
Depth
(ft)



34.5
71.09


25.53
29.90
23.2


24.70
36.11





53.50
25.4

43.21


30.

Elevations121
S

970
960
1020
1060
1005

1012
1010
992
998
995
1011
1027
1030
1030
1027
1013
1005
1048
1030
1032
1048
1000
1020
1036
WT



985
989


986
980
979


986
991






LOO 5

LOO 5


LOO 6
BR

940
923
958
990


967
954
949
982
959
975
960
961
970
976
976
988
991
980
984
988
960
978


Other
Data'3'

S

S
S
S
S
L,S
S
S

S
L,S

L
L
L
L
L


L,S
L,S

L

(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal: In = Industrial: O = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface: WT = Water Table: BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
cr>
o

-------
Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
5cbc
5cca
Scab
6baa
6cbb
6aac
7ddd
7dca
8bbd
TOWNSHIP
3bba
3dccl
3dcc2
12cdb
TOWNSHIP
18cbd
18dca
19aab
19abb
30ccc
31bbb


Use'1'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
D
Ir
Ir
D
D

M

Ir


12 3/4





12 3/4
32
25
80
55
55

80
40
84
1958

1972

1961



1971

25
80


38


84
16 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIT
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir


6
6
28
28
28
35
1966
1966
1964
1967
17 NORTH, RANGE 3 WEST INDIA
D
D
D
D
D
S
42





41
190
175
130
30

1889
1942
1937
1945


27
28
28
34
N MERII










v




)IAN
20
21


IAN






Water Level
Date


12-18-72



4-28-71








5-3-67

11-15-72



12-4-72

Depth
(ft)

20.75



26.


30.





9.

20.



21.01


Elevations'21
S

1015
1009
1010
1035
1020
1000
960
960
1005

975
970

970

1110



1040

WT

994



994


930





961

1090



1019

BR

983
984
930
980
965
988
880
920
921

948
942

936

1069



1010


Other
Data1"











S
S



S
S
S

S
S
(1) D — Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevation! are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.

-------
                              Table A-l  (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
2bbb
3bcc
3ddd
6ccc
lOddd
13dcc
14ddd
14dcc
15bdd
15ddd
15cdc
16daa
16ddd
16dcc
17daa
17dcd
17cdd
18ddd
18ccc
19aad
19add
19dad
19dcc
20aba
20ada
20ccb


Use11'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total I Saturated
(ft) 1 (ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
D
D
D
0
D
S
0
0
D
D
0
D
0
0
D
S
S
D

0
0
0
0
S

D










7















35
25
31


35


60
50
50
70


135

90
108
90




65





1973


1973
1973
1957
1957
1972
1943
1973
1973
1938


1954

1974
1974
1974
1974
1968





47


31
43


50

32
65





88
81
76
76
65
! 65
60


























Water Level
Date













12-7-72


12-14-72











Depth
(ft)


24.
20.





30.


18.20


22.


30.
75.








Elevations'21
S

1015
1110
1130
1162

1103
1100
1116
1171
1140
1130
1133
1109
1115
1120

1090
1093
1080
1090
1080
1077
1073
1090
1090
1078
WT


1086
1110





1141


1115


1098


1063
1005







BR

980
1085
1099
1115

1068
1069
1073
1111
1090
1080
1073
1077
1050


1000
985
990
1002
999
1001
997
1025
1025
1018

Other
Data(3)




L
S

L
L
S
S
L
S
L
L
S
S

S

L
L
L
L
S
S
S
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; IT = Irrigation: M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
ro

-------
                                Table A-l (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
20bdb
21aaa
21bbc
21cccl
21ccc2
21cdc
21cdd
21dcc
21daa
21ccc
21cbb
22aaal
22aab
22aba
22bab
22aaa2
22daa
23daa
23dcc
23ccc
24bba
24ada
24ddc
25bba
25baa
26aaa


Use11'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIE
Ir
D
S
A
M
M
M
S
S
ot
0
D
D
D
S
0
0
D
D,S
0
S
S
D,S
D
0
0




12
12
12




8






6

5%






70

63
68
90
85
100
90


68
55
60
50


130
175

65
90

16





1922
1962
1962
1962
1955

1973
1973
1951
1955
1960
1966
1973
1973
1966
1951
1973
1969
1891


1973
1973
92



68
90
85


62
89




42
71


61




26
20
Saturated
(ft)
IAN


























Water Level
Date





12-21-72



12-21-72
12-21-72


5-17-72


12-7-72











Depth
(ft)




27.



39.80
40.00


30.64


13.


20.
75.








Elevations'21
S

1090
1110

1053
1046
1058
1067
1067
1082
1051
1080
1140
1140
1150
1150
1131
1130
1065
1080
1112
1090

1060

1083
1055
WT




1026



1027
1042


1109


1137


1045
1005







BR

998
1040

990
978
968
982
967
992
989
991
1072
1085
1090
1100
1095
1059


1051
1025



1057
1035

Other
Data'31


S
S

S
S
S
S
S
L
L
S
S
S
S
L
L
S
S
L
S
S
S
S
L
L
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
o>
CO

-------
Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
26abb
26dcd
26cdd
26cdc
26dcc
27abb
27baa
27bba
27add
27cbbl
27dcc
27cdc
27aba
27dda
28aaa
28abb
28ccc
2 8 odd
28ddb
28cdc
29daa
29ccb
29cac
29dcb
29ddal
29dca


Use01
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERT
0
0
Ir
D
D
0
S
D
0
0
0
0
S
D
0
0
0
0
0
Ir
0
D,S
Ir
Ir
D
D

7
12






4%
7
4J?






7








27
53
80







34
45





63


60

68
64
50
1973
1972

1937

1973


1973
1973
1972
1973
1955

1973
1973
1973
1973
1972

1973



1967

22
27



40


45
44
58
33


60
77
58
40
63

67





Saturated
(ft)
DIAN


























Water Level
Date




10-24-72
11-8-72





4-23-73

4-23-73
5-17-72





9-21-72



11-10-72


11-10-72
Depth
(ft)



16.70
45.





10.42

11.34
26.60





38.90



20.6


29.5

Elevations'2'
S

1078
1015
1027
1045

1100


1060
1036
1050
1024
1095
1047
1060
1068
1048
1032
1057
1052
1062
1063
1062
1066
1050
1060
WT



1010
1000





1026

1013
1068





1020



1041


1030
BR

1056
988
974
965

1060


1015
992
992
991
1050

1000
991
990
992
994

995
1003

998
986
1010

Other
Data'31

L
L,S


S
L
S
S
L
L,S
L,S
L,S
S
S
L
L
L
L
L,S
S
L
S

S
S

(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface: WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Litbologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.

-------
                                Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL DATA
Location
TOWNSHIP
29dda2
29bcc
30ddd
31bba
31cdd
31±»ad
31ccc
31add
31aba
32bbbl
32dcc
32bbb2
32bba
32cdc
32aad
32dad
33dbb
33aab
3 3 ebb
33ccc
33abb
33bbb
33bba
33bdb
33cca
33ccd
Use'1'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)
Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total 1 Saturated
(ft) | (ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
A
0
S
Ir
D,S
S
0
0
0
0
0
S
A

S
A
0
0
0
0
D
D
A
In
A
0



12
5%

4%









1^





2

25



50
78
53



60
60
58

69

64


60
75
32
50
28


1974


1952

1972
1974
1974
1973
1973
1967
1952



1974
1973
1973
1973
1970
1938
1967

1974

64

81


50
74
64
70
67





77
65
77
56




33
















30







Water Level
Date

11-9-72


11-16-72
12-18-72
11-15-72
11-20-73




11-16-72


10-24-72

4-28-73



11-8-72

10-25-72

Depth
(ft)

15.80


26.16
29.20
31.0
23.61




31.10


48.55

35.04



10.80

3.10

Elevations'2'
S

1050
1063

1061
1040
1061
1045
1056
1059
1061
1050
1063
1063
1030

1061
1069
1058
1054
1050
1050
1050
1046
1035
1010
1000
WT

1034


1035
1011
1030
1021




1032


1012

1023



1035

1007

BR


998

980
990
983
995
981
995
991
986
1003
1003
972

992
983
993
977
994
990
975

985
982
967
Other
Data'3'


L
S

S
S
L,S
L
L
L
L
S
S
S
S

L
L,S
L
L
S
S
S
S

L
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(S) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
CTI
tn

-------
                                Table A-l  (continued).  WATER WELL  DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
33dda
34aaa
34aab
34abb
34bab
34bdd
34bbb
34add
34cbb
34ccb
34cdc
34dcc
34dad
34cdd
35cdc
35dcd
35bbb
35ddd
35ddc
35aaa
35aab
35baa
35dcc
36bba
36cdc
36dcd


Use'11
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
A
0
0
Ir
D
D
D
S
Ir
D
0
0
S
4%

1%
4^
1%

1%


2
4%
^k














82

75
54
^43

63


69
55
22
40
32


45
75
90
105
24

102


28
1974
1973
1973
1973
1973
1974
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973


1973
1973






1971
1973
1973
1920
80
66
74
56
43
33
62
56
63
71
54
20


21
73







25
46



43
22
39

31


19
26















Water Level
Date




4-23-73
4-23-73
4-23-73

4-23-73


4-23-73
4-23-73
3-13-73
10-24-72
10-25-72


12-13-73



10-24-72




10-24-72
Depth
(ft)



30.55
33.85
4.27

30.96


52.46
28.24
5.79
23.90
24.60


37.8

70.

14.0




32.60

Elevations'21
S

1045
1048
1058
1045
1023
1010
1052
1030
1050
1050
1028
990
1020
1025
1000
1040
1045
1042
1040
1045
1013


1051
1018
1005
WT



1027
1011
1019

1021


998
1000
984
996
1000


1007

970

999




962
BR

965
982
984
989
980
977
990
974
987
979
974
970
980
993
979
967
1000
967
950

989


1026
972
977

Other
Data131

L,S
L
L,S
L,S
L,S
L
L,S
L
L
L,S
L,S
L,S
S

L
L
S

S
S
S
S
S
L
L
S
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: O = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
CTi

-------
                               Table A-l  (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
36cca
36abb
TOWNSHIP
4cbb
4caa
4bbb
5ccc
6bba
6bdd
6ccc
7cdd
7dbb
8ddd
8ccc
9ddd
lOdcc
12aaa
13dda
13ddd
14dda
14cbc
16aaa
17bba
18bba


Use'11
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
S
S



50






17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
S
D
0
D
0
Ir
D
D
Ir
0
S
D
0
D
D
0
S
0
D
D
S


4%

4%
5%

8
10



4^


4%

v$


6

70
95.5

66
77

105
46



48.5
95
93
94
96
62


80


1973


1964

1960
1966
1973


1973
1971
1964
1973
1957
1973





95

67
77


42
70


45


89

61











29












Water Level
Date



10-24-72



11-9-73

11-9-73
10-19-73


8-12-66



11-9-73
1971

11-9-73
12-13-72
11-9-73



Depth
(ft)


71.00



26.25

33.80
11.60


13



21.10
45

34.72
29.40
20.94




Elevations12'
S

1025
1060


1120
1127

1146
1112

1108
1070
1089


1060
1163
1089
1090
1077
1070


1115
WT


1023



1101

1112
1100


1057



1039


1055

1049



BR


1010


1050
1032

1079
1055

1003
1028
1019


1015
1068
996
1001
981
1009


1035

Other
Data(3)

S
S

S

L,S
S
L,S

S
S
S
L
S
S
L,S

S
L,S
S
L,S
S
S
S
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
en

-------
                                Table A-l (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
18ccc
19cdd
19cbd
19 da a
19acb
19abc
19adb
19bad
19abb
19cdd
20aaa
20aab
24abb
24bbc
25ccc
25dcd
26aaa
26ccc
27aaa
27ddd
30ddb
30aaa
32acc
32bbd
35ada
35aaa


Use'11
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
0
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
0
0
D
D
D
D,S
S
D
0
0
M
Ir
Ir
Ir
D
D
4%
7
7
12
8 5/8
8 5/8
12
8 5/8
8 5/8
7

4k







4%

7

6


33
37
39
35
30
31
25
34
25
35

42
73
90
60
78
70


28
45
27
45
37
51
65
1973
1968
1968
1966
1965
1965
1966
1965
1965
1969
1973
1973

1950
1946



1973
1973
1961
1964

1967
28
35
37
33
30
30
23
33
25
35
25
39






43
24

53

37
1940
1962
























26


Water Level
Date


11-9-73
6-28-68
6-28-68
2-19-66
9-20-65
6-8-65
2-17-66
10-12-65
6-4-65
7-29-69

11-9-73







11-9-73

2- 18- 64

4-26-67


Depth
(ft)

27.48
7
7
8
11
11
8
25
6
7

29.28







7.67

38.

38.



Elevations'21'
S

1050
984
985
988
988
990
989
990
1020
985
1026
1050
1082
1078
1050
1060
1075

1055
1028
985
979
983
988
1043
1043
WT

1023










1021







1020






BR

1012
949
948
955
958
960
966
957

950
1001
1011
1009
988
990
982
1005

1011
1004
940
926
935
951
992
978

Other
Data'31

L,S









L
L,S
S
S
S
S
S
S
L
L,S
S


S
S
S
(1) D = Domestic; S = Slock: A = Abandon: It = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: O = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
CO

-------
                                Table  A-l (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
35bab
36bbc
36aba
TOWNSHIP
Idbd
2aaal
2aaa2
2acc
3abb
4dcd
5aba
6caa
7aaa
7aad
7dcb
9aaa
9add
9bbb
lOaaa
lOccb
lOdad
lldddl
Ilddd2
llccc


Use11'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
D
D
Ir


12
40
65
89
1932
1950
1973


85



17 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
Ir
D,S
0

S
D,S
D,S
Ir
0
S
Ir
0
S
S
Ir
0
S
0
0
D
12 3/4
6
4%
Ir


6
16


12



12



4^

82
102
42



60
44


40



50



59

1970
1972
1973



1950
1953
1973

1946
1973


1952
1973

1973
1973

80

47




44
34

40
63


50
17

44
57

40

21







33



26



20

Water Level
Date




11-15-73

7-23-70
8- -72
6-6-73







10-1-64



2-24-53



6-6-73

Depth
(ft)



29.25

33.2
40
25.50



30.
17.


7.



24.



36.97


Elevations'21
S

1044
1050
1055

1103

1120
1103



1080
1080

1020
1089


1080
1140

1070
1080

WT





1070

1094







1113



1056



1053

BR

1004
985
970

1023

1073




1036
1046

980
1026


1030
1123

1026
1023


Other
Data'3'

S
S



S
L,S

S
S
S

L
S

L
S
S

L
S
L
L,S
S
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; H = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
VO

-------
Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL  DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
12aaa
12bbb
12dda
12dac
12ccc
14aad
15ddb
16aaa
16bab
17bcd
17bbb
17bbd
17bcc
17cac
18cac
18bba
18bdc
18aab
IBaac
18add
18bcc
19bbb



Use11'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
0
0
In
Ir
S
D
Ir
D
D
Ir
S
Ir
S
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
0
D,S

4%

5^
12 3/4

6
6


6
1%
2

2
Ik
2
2
2
12
12
4%


75

100
63

22
33
50
47
35
22
40


35
35
35
38
40
35
30


1973
1973

1971


1972


1972

1948

1953
1940
1947
1941
1946

1954
1973


77
83

62

22
33


35




35
35
35



28

i
33


29
















24


Water Level
Date


6-7-73

5-16-73
2-23-71


4-4-73

4-30-73
7-20-72

2-24-53

8- -54
2-23-53
2-23-53
2-23-53
2-24-53
10- 1- 64
10-1-64
6-6-73


Depth
(ft)

43.50

46.40
33.


0.00

14.
4.

15.

12.
10.
10.
10.
15.
9.
4.
4.17



L Elevations'2'
S

1095
1097

. 1100

1040
1000


1010




1016
1015
1014
1020
1020

1013


WT

1051


1067
















1009


BR

1018
1014

1038

1018
967


975




981
980
979
982
980

985



Other
Data'3'

L,S
L


S
S
S
S


S

S


S




L,S
S

(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
f3> L = Lithalogic Log Avtibble; S = Water Aatljfiit Available.

-------
Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
laca
Ibcc
2dbd
2aca2
2abdl
2ddb
2dbc
2daa
2dad
2daa
2dbc
2acc
2abd2
2abc
2bad
2bbd
2bdb
2 ebb
2cdd
2cbc
2abd3
2acal
3aac
3cbd
4cbal
4cba2


Use111
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total 1 Saturated
(ft) 1 (ft)
17 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
Ir
Ir
0
M
M
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
M
0
0
Ir
Ir
In
In
12 3/4
2
4%
8
8


2
2
2
4
8
8
12
2

6

2



12 3/4
6
13 3/8
5
38
28
41.5
32
32
35
40
30
30
48
38
38
40
37
38
50
45

27



37
31
40
35
1971
1949
1973
1970
1970
1947
1947
1945
1945
1945
1952
1951
1951
1967
1951
1937
1966
1968
1948
1973
1968
1968
1973
1966
1969
1969
36

35
38
38
35
40


35
38


37
38

43



40
40
37
31
27
28


26
26
26





19


23








26

17
18
Water Level
Date


9-21-73
2-26-53
6- 6-73
4-20-70
4-20-70
4-23-53
4-23-53
4-23-53
4-23-53

2-24-53
2-24-53
2-24-53
9-6-67
2-23-53
2-23-53

3-21-73
2-23-53



2-17-73
11-4-66
5-6-69
5-7-69
Depth
(ft)

12.
9.
9.40
12.
12.
8.
10.
10.
10.

12.
10.
16.
14.
15.
22.5

16.
10.



11.
8.
10.
10.

Elevations'21
S

1075
1040
1023
1030
1032
1023
1024
1030
1030

1030
1072
1033
1033
1032
1040
1035
1031

1028
1032
1030
1050
1030


WT



1014










1019












BR

1069
1012
988
992
994
988
984
1000
1000

992
994
993
996
994
990
992
988


992
990
1013
999



Other
Data'3'



L,S
S
S
S


S




S



S

S
L
L




(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; H = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic. Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.

-------
                               Table A-l  (continued).  WATER WELL DATA
Location
TOWNSHIP
4cbbl
4cbb2
4cba3
4cba4
4cbb3
4bcd
4cba5
4caa
lldba
lldcd
llaab
lladd
llaad
llaaa
lladc
lldaa
llbbd
llbabl
llbad
Ilbab2
12bad
12bbd
12bdd
12cdcl
12cdb
12cacl
12cac2
Use'1'
17 NC
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
Ir
0
0
A
A
M
M
S
D
D
D
D
D
Ir
Ir
Ir
0
0
0
M
Casing IWell
Diameter [Depth
(in) (ft)
)RTH, RANG
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
4%
4%
6
4


15
JE 7 W
38
38
38
39
36
35
39
33
36
40


35
Year
Drilled
:ST INDI)
1969
1969
1969
1969
1969
1970
1970
1966
1973
1973


1953
1953
1953
1958
Terrace Thickness
Total 1 Saturated
(ft) (ft)
\N MERll
28
28
27
27
27
34
31
33
38
31


35
33
31
35
3IAN
18
18
22
21
21
21
23
23
23
20




Water Level
Date
8-13-69
8-15-69
8-14-69
8-15-69
8-15-69
10-2-70
10-2-70
11-18-66
6-6-73
6-6-73
4-5-73
4-5-73


3-13-58
Depth
(ft)
10
10
5
6
6
13
7.75
10
14.90
10.90
12.22
12.16


4
Elevat ions'21
S

1030
1025
1025
1022
1025
1022
1021

1030
1030
1024
1023
1020
1019
1019
WT

1020
1010
1014




BR

997
987
994
986
985

988
987
988
984
Other
Data'31

L,S
L,S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
L
L
L
S
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Litaologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
ro

-------
                               Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL DATA


Location


Use111
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
12cbd
12cca
12ccd
12cdc2
12cac
12cbd
12cdd
12daal
12daa2
13bbbl
13bbb2
13bbb3
13bbal
13bba
13bdb
14bca
TOWNSHIP
13ddd
19bbb
21ccc
30aaa
30ddc
33bbt>
34ddd
M
M
M
M
Ir
S
S
0
A
M
M
M
M
M
S
D
18 NC
D
0
D,S
S
D,S
D
0
15
15
15
15
6
6
6
4%
r





1%

)RTH, RANG



8
6
6

32
32
33
34
35
22

26


30
31.6
37
30


;E 5 wi





90


1950
1950
1950
1968
1972

1973








SST INDIJ

1973



1970
1973
32
32
33
34
35
22

25








IN MERi:

36




13
25
26
33




12








)IAN







Water Level
Date


4-4-73
4-4-73
9-4-52
9-4-52



6-6-73
5-16-73











3-20-73



Depth
(ft)

7.25
6.38
5
6



12.64
8.04











19.00




Elevations'21
S

1017
1018
1019
1018
1018

1019
1007
1020
1022
1021
1020
1016
1016




1170

1161

1145
1107
WT

1011
1012




1008
1020
















BR

985
986
986
984
983


995


991
989
979
986




1134




1094

Other
Data(3)

S
S
S

S
S
S
L,S

S


S

S
S

S
L
S
S
S
S
L
U» D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Litbologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
co

-------
Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL  DATA


Location


Use'1'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
Iddd
labb
Idee
Iddb
labd
4aac
4dad
6bbd
8aaa
8ddd
lOaaa
10 da a
lOccd
llbbb
12dcc
12ddd
12ccc
12bbb
13accl
13acc2
13 abb
13bcc
13dcc
13acc3
13dbc
13dcb
13ddd2
0
0
0
D,S
D
Ir
D
Ir
0
D,S
D
S
S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
M
M
M



6

16
36
16

2
6
6
60










12
12
12
10



68
48
44
26
61

24
70
30
28










50
59
62
50
1948
1948
1948


1952

1953





1948
1948
1948
1948
1948

1948
1948
1948
1948
1949
1949
55
10
39


44

61
55





48
50
37
44
56
58
58
41
65
50
59
1949 ! 62
1963
58























25
30
36
36
Water Level
Date







2-25-53
7-31-50
2-25-53


3-6-73
7-12-50
7-14-50










5-31-49
5-31-49
5-31-49
3-20-73
Depth
(ft)






12
13.25
25


30
21.22
21.56










25
29
26
31.7

Elevations'2'
S

1137
1130
1107


1100
1097
1149
1138

1101
1097
1060
1077
1117
1118
1102
1112
1116
1117
1117
1097
1118
1113
1117
1114
1121
WT







1084

1119

1071
1076
1038










108E
1088
1088
10 9C
BR

1082
1120
1068


1056
1061
1088
1083

1041
1067
1032

1069
1068
1065
1068
1058
1059
1059
1056
1053
1063
1058
1052
1063

Other
Data'31

L
L
L
S
S



L
S

S

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
S
S

S
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.

-------
                               Table A-l (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location


Use(1)
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
13dddl
13dda
13 baa
14bbb
14aba
15aac
15bba
17ddd
17acc
18dac
I9bab
2ldcc
2laad
2lcdc
23aaa
'23bab
23cac
24ddd
24aad
24add
24aab
24cda
24abb
24cdc
25ccc
26aaa2
26aab
M
M
D
0
D
DjS
S
0
Ir
Ir
0
D
D,S
D
0
D,S
Ir
0
Ir
Ir
D,S
Ir
A
A
D,S
D,S
Ir
10
10


8
6
42

12
12

5



6
12

12
12

6


6
6
6
60
50
45

42
53


55
57

57
42
50

70
34

60
60
60
55
45
50
27
55
32
1963
1963
1968
1948

1920


1969
1969


1968
1951
1948
1941
1973
im
-LiJD^
1952
1972
1967


1889
1950
1966
57
56

33



48
55

50



38

34
56
















31


23



13

28










Water Level
Date


7-15-63
8-1-63


7-17-50
8-1-50
7- 14- 50

9 	 69
7 	 69

7-17-50




8-25-73


2-26-54

3-27-67




8-13-66
Depth
(ft)

17
17


23.34
31.71
18.61
16.50
7
15
26.80
30.74









11.50




9

Elevations'21
S

1123
1119

1098

1097

1101
1120

1104
1081
1060
1090
1101

1100
1125
1118
1120

1110




1094
WT





_
1066

1084


1077
1050




1094










BR

1066
1063

1065



1053
1065

1054
1024
1018
1040
1063

1066
1069
1058
1060

1055




1062

Other
Data13'



S
L

S

L


L

S

L
S

L


S

S
S
S


(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table; BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
Ul

-------
                                Table  A-l  (continued).  WATER WELL DATA


Location
TOWNSHIP
26aba
26bcd
26ccc
26dcc
26aaal
27aaa
27aad
28cdb
29ddd
33bbb
34dba
34dab
35baa
35aaa
35cca
36cac
TOWNSHIP
19bca
28bcb
31abb
34bbb
34cbc
35ddd


Use'11
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)
18 NORTH, RANGE 7 W
Ir
Ir
D
S
A
0
Ir
D

D,S
Ir
Ir
Ir
0
Ir
Ir
19 NC
S
D,S
D
D
D,S
D
6
12




2
1%

1%
12
12
6


6
)RTH, RANC

42




35
42
40

35

20
31

25
35
35
30

30
49
3E 6 Wl

60

39
55
50

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
BST INDIAN MERIDIAN
1967
1970
1940



1967


1972
1954
1954
1970
1973
1952
1965
E1ST INDD




1941


38



42


44



26
47


\N MERI]











26


30







DIAN






Water Level
Date


3-27-67
4-4-73







3-5-73


8-6-70

2-23-53
7 	 65







Depth
(ft)

13
12.5



15.60


14.10
9


12

15
5








Elevations'21
S

1092
1090



1078
1080

1040

1045
1040
1085
1080
1038
1085







WT






1063


1026














BR

1057
1052



1036


996

1010
1005
1059
1033
1008
1036








Other
Data'3'


S
S
S
S
L
S
S

S


S
L



S
S
S
S
S
S
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock: A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface: WT = Water Table. BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
CT>

-------
Table A-l (continued).   WATER WELL DATA


Location


Use'1'
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Depth
(ft)

Year
Drilled
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
Saturated
(ft)
TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
9adc
18bcc
23ccc
25bab
29ddd
29bbb
30dca
30aac
30ddb
30dcc
31bbb
3 Iced
36bdc
36cdc
TOWNSHIP
13ddd
19bbb
21ccc
30aaa
30ddc
33bbb
34ddd
Ir
D
A
A
0
D
Ir
Ir
Ir
0
0
D
A
A
18 N(
D
0
D,S
S
D,S
D
0
16
6
216
120


16

16


7
6

)RTH, RANi



8
6
6

34
24
60
50

55
75
111
91


68
50
47
3E 5 W







1949







1949





ilST INDI

1973



1970
1973
34



74


109

92
78



!\N MERI

36




13




57




50
60



DIAN







Water Level
Date


5-6-79
8-3-50

8-9-45

6-7-71
8-3-50

7-31-52


7-14-50






3-20-73



Depth
(ft)

3.75
18.73
25
41
16.80
30
42.19

38
42.2
17.70
30.47






19.00




Elevations'2'
S

1100
1204


1150

1183
1175

1182
1160





1170

1161

1145
1107
WT


1186


1133

1141


1140
1142











BR

1066



1076

1108
1066

1090
1082





1134




1094

Other
Data13'





L




L
L

S
S

S
L
S
S
S
S
L
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal: In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT a Water Table: BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.

-------
                               Table A-l (continued).  WATER WELL DATA
Location
TOWNSHIP
3aab
3cbd
4bbb
5dddl
5ddd2
6bbb
6ddd
7aac
7ddd
7ccc
8dcc
8ccc
9cbc
9ccc
lOdddl
10ddd2
lOdac
lObbb
lObcc
12ccc
14cdc
15baa
IScad
16aaa
16ddd
16ccd
17ddd
Use'1'
18 NO
DS
0
D
0
D
0
0
0
S
D
D
0
S
0
0
0
S
0
D
D
D
S
0
0
0
0
0
Casing
Diameter
(in)
RTH, RANG
4%
7 3/8
4%
4%
6
7
4%
8
4i>
4i>
Well
Depth
(ft)
E 6 WE
39
45
69
45
30
103
90
93
58
100
82
80
89
67
Year
Drilled
ST INDIA
1973
1964
1973
1973
1973
1973
1971
1956
1933
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
1973
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
N MERID
34
38
45
33
32
33
40
57
55
50
81
80
63
42
Saturated
(ft)
IAN
20
15
21

41
73

Water Level
Date
3-19-73
6-11-73
3-19-73
3-15-73
6-11-73
6-11-73
3-15-73
6-11-73
6-7-73
6-7-73
Depth
(ft)
13.6
13.75
18.39
22.9
23.70
8.62
43.2
13.60
7.90
31.70
Elevations(2)
S
1170
1169
1172
1171
1120
1153
1150
1130
1121
1160
1131
1170
1166
1174
1174
1171
1170
1170
1166
1170
1150
WT
1156
1096
1141

1160
1162
113 £
BR
1136
1100
1134
1075
1120
1118
1098
1126
1117
1119
1121
1089
1090
1077
1007
1108
Other
Data(3)
S
L,S
S
L
L,S
L
L,S
S
S
S
L
L
L
L
S
L
S
S
S
S
L
L
L
L,S
L
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface; WT = Water Table: BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
"-4
00

-------
                               Table A-l  (continued).   WATER WELL DATA
Location
TOWNSHIP
17aab
17bbc
17bbb
17bad
18cdc2
IBcdcl
18dcc2
ISdccl
18ccc
19aaa
20abb
20ccc
20ccal
20cca2
21dcc
21CCC
22aaa
22cdd
22bbc
22ccc
24bbb
26ddd
26adb
26aaa
27cbc
27ccc
28bac
Use'1'
18 NO
0
DS
0
In
M
0
M
0
0
0
S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DS
0
0
D
D,S
0
S
0
In
Casing
Diameter
(in)
RTH, RANG
4^
4%
8
12
5%
12
5%
6
4%
7
5%
4%
6
6
6
8
5%
Well
Depth
(ft)
E 6 WE
58
90
41
120
60
66
60
80
69
140
85
52
143
70
90
80
82
Year
Drilled
ST INDIA
1973
1965
1973
1972
1973
1973
1963
1963
1939
1963
1973
1973
1957
1973
1973
1968
1973
1973
1970
1973
1973
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
N MERIE
55
36
56
67
64
55
66
67
67
64
57
47
49
22
45
37
Saturated
(ft)
IAN
12
24


4


Water Level
Date
6-11-73
6-11-73
5-1-73
3-20-73
11-21-72
5-9-73
6-7-73

5-9-73
Depth
(ft)
42.70
21.25
30.3
32.25
18.90
23.3
42.90

26.85
Elevations'21
S
1180
1130
1130
1140
1114
1114
1120
1120
1118
1120
1130
1118
1110
1110
1110
1113
1117
1170
1160
1160
1184
1173
1174
1180
1140
1122
1120
WT
1137
1109
1110
1084
1091
1127


BR
1125
1094
1058
1053
1054
1065
1050
1052
1043
1043
1049
1060
1123
1111
1164
1135
1085
Other
Data'3'
L,S
S
L,S
S
L
S
L
L
L
S
L
L,S
L,S
L
L
L
S
L
L
S
S
L
S
L
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. S = Surface: WT = Water Table: BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available: S = Water Analysis Available.
-si
vo

-------
                               Table A-l (continued).  WATER WELL DATA
Location
TOWNSHIP
28ccc
29ccc
29bbb
29ddd
30abb
31bbb
31baa
31bac
31aac
3 Iced
31bbd
31dddl
31ddd2
32ccc
32abc
32bbd
32baa
32ddc
33ddc
34cccl
34ccc2
35bbbl
35bbb2
35ccc
35dcb
35ddd
36bbb
Use'1'
18 NC
D
0
S
0
0
0
0
S
D
S
A
S
0
0
Ir
Ir
0
D
A
D,S
0
0
S
D
S
0
0
Casing
Diameter
(in)
RTH, RANG
36
8
4^
5
6
6
5
%
12
16
4k
6
6
4i>
8

Well
Depth
(ft)
,E 6 W!
54
50
57
39
36
73
61
63
57
70
61


Year
Drilled
iST INDIA
1973
1973
1963
1973
1973
1969
1973
1973
1952
1953
1973
1970
1973
1973
1973
1973
Terrace Thickness
Total
(ft)
N MERID
50
62
56
42
53
34
31
60
57
63
43
67
Saturated
(ft)
IAN
33
27
42
40

Water Level
Date
5-9-73
6-7-73
5-15-73
5-15-73
6-7-73
7-9-53
8-12-53
6-7-73
4-24-73
6-7-73

Depth
(ft)
9.56
20.40
13.68
7.03
7.40
25
23
18.35
28.64
22.50

Elevations'21
S
1112
1100
1112
1116
1099
1102
1100
1100
1100
1089
1085
1103
1100
1105
1100
1100
1100
1143
1118
1170
WT

1082
1082
1078
1077
1087
1120

BR
1050
1050
1060
1057
1049
1050
1043
1061
1055
1054
1005
1016
1045
1047
1043
1080
1075
1103
Other
Data'3'
L
S
L
L
L
L,S
S
S
S
S
L,S
L
L,S
S
S
S
L
L,S
S
S
S
L
L
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: O = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Elevations are Mean Sea Level estimated from U.S. Geologic Survey Topographic Maps with 10 foot contour intervals. R = Surface: WT = Water Table: BR = Bedrock.
(3) L = Lithologic Log Available; S = Water Analysis Available.
00
O

-------
Table A-2   WATER QUALITY DATA
                81

-------
                                     Table  A-2.  WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS
lace
2cba
2acc
2aba
2baa
2bbl
2bb2
2babl
2bab2
2aaa
2dba
2dca
2bbdl
2bbd2
3aab
3abbl
3abb2
4aac
4abbl
4bbcl
4bbc2
4baa
(11 D =
(2) Tola
0)
W
a
HIP
D
sp
D
0
0
D
D
D
S
0
0
0
I
0
is
D
0
,c
-U
cx
OJ 4->
Q 0)
(U
rH U,
rH
O) C
3S-H
16 I
30
ring
90
95
95
43
56
65
62
36
48
57
40
^
O 0)
rH
(U CX
J-1 E
13 05
O 00
JORTH, RA1
3-30-71
3-15-71
5-18-72
9-10-71
11-10-73
9-15-71
10-24-72
12-13-72
3-7-73
8-3-71
10-24-72
7-7-72
3-14-73
5-30-73
6-28-72
3-14-73
6-12-73
6-27-72
12-19-72
12-19-72
8-3-71
5-30-73
Temperature
(°C)
iGE 4
17
17
17
12
13
17
14
17
17
14
13
ffi
&,
WESr
7.1
7.0
7.5
7.8
7.6
7.4
7.3
7.4
7.0
7.6
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.0
7.1
6.9
7.0
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.6
7.0
Specific
Conductance
(umhos)
r INDIM
1200
15000
600
850
525
5850
2000
1536
820
650
950
1700
1900
4000
5800
5400
1650
1906
1850
700
1250
Total
Hardness121
f MERir
620
288
250
1530
545
295
370
650
760
1540
1730
1090
450
395
360
Domestic : S = Slock: .4 = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation. M = Municipal: In =
Hardness r\iirr*-nt in n>g 1 as ("af();j
Total
Dissolved
Solids
(mg/1)
>IAN
835
380
341
1600
998
1110
548
510
1105
1900
2550
3770
350
1150
1239
1202
404
813
s~^
rH
tn
35
54
340
10
119
65
56
160
61
rH
tn
tn £
S ^
28
166
64
71
85
190
124
40
i-H
&)
rO 6
2 ^

64
136
125
750
642
145
rH
tn
cu s
fi, ^^,
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
12.9
108
0.0
11.5
.2
0.0
3.5
rH
tn
rH g
0 ^
100
5500
35
125
73
1650
610
475
275
76
39
50
475
425
1400
2350
1875
500
448
410
58
275
s~~*
rH
•3- tn
o e
C/3 ^
270
2.2
83
350
115
45
41
46
160
53
50
45
80
45
rH
ro tn
i£
8.8
14.6
21
1.06
48
6.8
5.08
.60
6.5
5.53
6.84
1.5
30
36
Induvir/ai: O = Observation: T = Test Well Imlled and Plugged.
oo
ro

-------
                                Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA



c
o
•H
4J
to
o
o
•-3








CU
CO
3
TOWNSHIP
5bbb
5cbc
S
D
TOWNSHIP
3dccl
3bba
Ir
Ir
TOWNSHIP
18cbd
18dca
19aab
30ccc
31bbb
D
D
D
D
S
TOWNSHIP
lOddd
15ddd
15bdd
16daa
17daa
17dcd
18ddd
19ada

D
D
D
iD
S
S
D

,c
-U
ft

Q OJ
0)
H tn
rH
0) C
3S-H




MH
O 
o
c:
O (TJ
•H -U <-*
mow
•H 3 O
0 T3 £1
0) C g
ft O a
co o ;>



w
w
OJ
H C
(0 TJ
4-> ^
£3


"O
CD
>
•H W /-x
rH O T3 H
03 W -rl -\
4-> CO H tT)
O -H O 6
EH O CO ^x
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.3
7.2
556
570


358
370
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.9
8.1
1630
2290
460
610
1050
1370
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.6
7.1
7.1
7.6
7.3
891
655
655
614
610





WEST INDIAN MERII
7.9
7.1
7.1
7.5
7.2
7.2
6.8
7.3
8000
922
525
998
660
737
809
246
620

156





579
426
426
399
430
IAN
5254
599
340
649
429
479
526
. 160





/— N
iH

^

rH 6
a -c>

35
24

150
420

20
22
34
36
37

2750
78
6.6
80
22
112
78
7





^-N
rH

•3- tn
^5




275
158







35

44










s-\
r-H

ro bl
9 e
S ^




.,6
17







<1.0

35





(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/1 as CaCOs-
00
CO

-------
                                 Table A-2  (continued).  WATER  QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS
19bcb
19cdd
19ccb
19cc
20ada
20 aba
20ccb
21aaa
21bbc
21ccc
21cdc
21cdd
21daa
21dcc
22aab
22aab
22aba
22bab
22aaa
22aaa
22aaa
23daa
OJ
W
:=>
HP
D
D
D
D
S
D
D
S
>PS
PS
PS
S
S
D
>D
D
S
}-
,c
4-J
CX
(U -P
Q QJ
0)
rH Lu
H
 6
15 fO
O CO
JORTH, RA1\
12- 4-72
10-25-72
5-17-72
6-14-72
12- 7-72
12- 7-72
5-17-72
12- 7-72
12- 7-72
10-27-72
10-27-72
10-27-72
12-21-72
12-21-72
6- 7-72
12- 6-72
12- 6-72
9-18-72
5-17-72
6-14-72
6-26-72
5-18-72
Temperature
(°C)
GE 4
14
17

17
17
17
15
15
17
K
a
WES1
7.0
6.7
6.9
6.9
7.1
7.3
7.2
8.0
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.1
8.0
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.4
Specific
Conductance
(umhos)
1 INDIA*
1792
560
750
800
368
799
4000
594
512
480
420
450
886
174
1250
1126
1004
885
1300
1450
1300
700
Total
Hardness
MERID
220

410
360
240
580
580
292
Total
Dissolved
Solids
(mg/1)
IAN
1165
364
640
580
239
519
650
386
333
312
273
293
576
113
780
732
652
528
864
924
840
556
rH
tn
SB



t

H
~tn
toe
s^-





<^
rH
tn
rO £
Z ^





rH
tn
cu e.
rjj ^s

0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.34
/~^
H
tn
H 6
0 ^
255
110
29
33
12
128
33
20
36
51
28
30
58
9
125
138
100
50
149
138
150
26
y^
rH
•sf tjl
SB

56
47
22

41
40
44
47
45
44
r^T
rO tn
0 6
Z ^-"

220
220
23

32. 5
27
152
153
4.5
.4
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock: A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/1 as CaCO-j.
00

-------
                                Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS*
23dcc
24ada
24bbal
24bba2
0)
W
Z)
IIP
D
S
S

TOWNSHIP
24bba
25ddc
25bba
26dcdl
26dcd2
26dccl
26dcc2
27cbbl
27cbb2
27dda
27dccl
27dcc2
27aba
27bba
27aa
27cdcl
S
D
D
0

D
0


0

S
D
S
0
4J
CX

0) P.
4-> g
(0 to
« CO
ORTH, RAN
6-18-72
12- 5-72
12- 4-72
5-18-72
17 NORTH, RAh
65


27





b8

45


33
5-18-72
10-24-72
8-27-71
6-29-72
6-30-72
8-17-71
7-19-72
3-15-73
6-12-73
11- 2-72
6-22-72
6-23-72
5-17-72,
5-17-72
12-21-72
3-15-73
Temperature
(°C)
3E 4

14
15

GE 4

14
19



16
17
15





15
E
P<
A/EST
7.5
7.3
7.0
7.1
WEST
7.1
7.4
7.6
7.5
7.4
81.!
7.6
7.1

7.4
/.I
7.1
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.5
Specific
Conductance
(^mhos)
INDIAN
2700
788
2099
2200
INDIAly
2200
1025
775
875
950
800
820
7800
1150
510
9000
9000
7250
4000
4149
1300
Total 1
Hardness
MERID
1660


860
Total
Dissolved
Solids
(mg/1)
IAN
1972
512
1364
1496
MERIDIAN
860

355
254
346
335
302
1650
364

1780

3700
1740

270
1496
740
586
596
610
534
496
5070
748
232
6200
5900
5000
3190
2697
845
x-v
rH
b>
3£












272
31






35
^-^
H
tn
§z












130
20






27
X— v
rH
tr>
tj e
:z >— '












3625
154






210
rH
tn

iH
sT b)
o e
CO ^

1714


44

44

30
10
55
145
65
60
50

150

44
67

64
s-^
H
<«~> tr>
§e
***s

0.0


.65

.65

27
11.6
11.6
0.8
2.0
0.36
5.12

3.0

9.5
21.5

2.16
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/1 as CaCOs
00
01

-------
                                Table A-2  (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA



c
o
•H
4-J
tfl
a
o
•^








CD
W
'->
TOWNSHIP
27cdc2J
28ddbl
28ddb2
28ccdl
28ccd2
28cdc
29ccbl
29ccb2
29dcb
29ddal
30ddd
31cddl
31cdd2
31bad
31ccc
32cdc
32bbb2
32bba
32aad
0
0
0
D
D
Ir
DS

Ir
D
ID
DS

S



i-C
4-J
a.
a> jj
Q (U
O)
rH U,
r-\
0} G
S -r«




MH
O OJ
rH

rrj £
O ^

45
















592
247
MERIDIAN
1950
|

71
1





,—v
rH

tn
tj) g
S ^

24



















31






s-*
rH

tn
rO ^


230



















530






x-v
rH

tn
(U e
p| v_/

6.2


.08


0.0





.08







'5-4






^-v
rH

tn
rH P
O v^

375
990
1010
18
14
32
44
40
16
16
242
10
11
19
51
32
66
205
23

1025






/-^
rH

•* tn
0 6
CO v-'

45
27
31
28

22
80





33

33





3.5






^-^
rH

fsT) £y)
o e
j^
^", N^X

4.20
4.0
4.5
21.5

22
14.9





29

4.0





5.34

(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal; In = Industrial: O = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) ToUl Hardness expressed in mg/l as CaCOy.
00

-------
                                Table A-2 (continued).   WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS!
33aab2
33bbb
33bbal
33bba2
33babl
33bab2
33bab3
33bab4
33abb2
34dad
34aaW
34aabS
34abb
34babl
34bab!<
34bbbl
34bbbS
34ccb
34dcc
a;
O
IIP
D
A
Ir
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
32cdcJ 0
34cdc2
Q OJ
0)
H tij
 £
15 nJ
Q CO
fORTH, RAN
5-30-73
11- 9-72
11 8-72
12-13-72
12-21-72
12-21-72
6-12-73
11- 1-73
5-18-73
11- 2-73
11-10-72
3-15-73
5-30-73
3-15-73
3-15-73
5-30-73
3-15-73
5-30-73
3-15-73
3-14-73
3-14-73
6-12-73
Temperature
(°C)
GE 4
14
15
23
16
14
14
13
14
14
14
15
14
15
16
16
17
Qi
WEST
7.0
7.2
7.8
7.8
7.1
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.0
7.5
7.4
/.O
6.7
7.0
7.0
7.1
b. /
7.0
Specific
Conductance
(^mhos)
INDIAls
3300
350
256
256
370
364
' 700
330
550
480
7500
1600
2000
1700
1050
1050
4200
4000
15000
9800
19000
19000
Total
Hardness
MERIE
400
362
144
330
380
360
175
260
530
480
2230
3760
3500
3250
Total
Dissolved
Solids
(mg/1)
IAN
2154
228
166
166
240
237
455
215
340
312
4875
1046
1300
1110
684
683
2730
2600
9750
6370
12400
12350
S 	
rH
tn
65
51
32
45
82
19
6
48
130
390
3000
3500
800
^4
en
35
42
31
45
33
20
29
45
200
380
260
190
rnT
tn
530
25
250
300
280
192
180
805
750
7550
1180
4200
3950
In
oj 6
ILL, v_x
25.4
.2
184
4.7
250
150
425
6.2
175
12.3
< .2
rH?
In
35
1250
16
23
23
15
15
9
15
44
40
3050
538
450
463
263
200
1525
1150
7150
4150
8762
8925
•vt CD
0 6
CO ^
50
39
95
50
64
36
42
39
54
68
50
72
48
*~-\
O 6
1.31
.62
6.4
< .2
.68
2.86
0.22
.6J
5.84
1.27
15.60
<0.2
5.66
3.64
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/1 as CaCOg.
00

-------
                                Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA


c
o
•rl
4-)
rO
O
O
*-"
TOWNS
34cdd
55bbb
55dcc
55ddc
55aaa
55aabl
55aab2
55baa
56cca
56dcd
TOWNS:
4cbb
4bbb
5ccc
6bba
6ccc
6bba
7cdd
7dbb
8ccc
9ddd







0)
CO
•-'
ilP
A
Ir
D
D
D
S

Ir
S
S
ilP
S

D

4J
o<
CD 4->
Q 
rd

CU

e cj
 /-^
mow
•H 3 O
o -o x:
0) C g
a o >
en o ^r


co
to
0)
•H C
03 'O
[ i r_j
O 03
EH ffi

TJ
0)

H CO s~*
H O ti rH
CTJ CO -H \
4J CO H tn
O •!-» 0 g
f-\ C\ V) ^
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.7
7.3
7.6
7.3
7.2
7.2
7. b
7.6
7.3
7.3
3000
287
1500
700
610
925
600
920
510
600


435




350


1950
186
826
540
400
660
460
596
410
390
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.3
7.5
6.8
7.3
6.6
7.3
6.9
8.4
6.8
7.0
700
710
800
800
430
800
1050
780
650
970
240
253

278

278
300
276
250
310
455
352
520
368
280
368
683




^^.
rH
•"\
tn
03 g
O ^












60

65

32

68
480
423
61
630 1 74




s-^
rH
^x^
tn

S ^












24

27

13

30

24
30




s- *,
rH

tn
rQ £
13 ^












72

89

51

140
62
59
128




s-^
rH

tn
O) g
tti V_^












6.4

= 1.0

<1.0

1.0

1.0
1.0




s-^
rH

b>
H g
O ^

562
12
310
57
85
130
31
82
30
30

90
61
100
94
15
94
220
30
170
150




/-^
rH

<* tn

C/3 ^



110




40



35
40
50
43
33
43
85
51
41
150




^_^
rH

1*0 tri
O g




0.21
58.8
40






6.81
5.0
18.3
4.0
8.8
4.0
2.3
39
11.9
3.0
(1> D = Domestic: S = Stock: A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: O = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/l as CiCOg.
00
00

-------
                               Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS
LOdcc
L3dda
L3ddd
L4dda
L4cbc
L6aaa
17bba
LSbba
18ccc
20aacl
20aac2
24abb
24bbc
25ccc
25dcd
26ccc
27ddd
30cdb
32bbdl
32bbd2
35ada
35aaa

Q CU
0)
rH U,
rH

910
660
600
758
112
900
1000
600
600
1100
1100
252
474
550
460
350
360
1660
379
4900
650
1100
Total
Hardness
f MERIT
381
186
330
360
220
247
516
516
155
312
100
960

Total
Dissolved
Solids
(mg/1)
)IAN
436
429
252
493
220
585
650
390
304
524
524
164
308
358
299
228
128
972
253
3060
423
715
rH
t7)
f^ G

85
88
50



rH
tn

30
33
20



/— s
rH
&)
(TJ £
*Z v-x

101
101
59

251
46
671

tn
CU £

1.0
1.0
3.5



H
0 •&
51
68
162
120
25
135
190
70
46
149
149
17
34
41
35
22
19
260
16
1450
66
232
rH
-------
                                Table A-2  (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA



c
o
•H
4J
to
O
O
'"'








QJ
en
•^
TOWNSHIP
55bab
56bbc
D
D
TOWNSHIP
2aaal
2aaa2
3abb
4dcd
5aba
7aad
9add
9bbbl
9bbb2
LOdad
Llccc1
Llcc2
Llddd
L2aaa
L2ccd
L4aad
L5ddb
L6aaa

D
0
S
DS
DS
S
D
D


rC
4_)
C^4
0) 4->
O O)
0)
rH U,
rH
CD C
S -H




4-4
O OJ
rH
CD a
[ ) c
rO fO
O CO
o>
£-1
3
-P
tO
f-l
(V

E CJ
 CO H tn
O -H O 6
EH P CO -5
IAN
293
429
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
6.7
7.0
6.8
6.6
6.5
7. 2

7.3
7.2
6.8
/.O
7.2
7.0
7.0
6.8
6.8
7.2
7.0

650
760
358
4000
600
600
800
• 700
800
900
1200
1400
750
620
900
900
1900
1800

265
450
280
1470
205
245_
395
165
190
280
405
450
300
225
320
585
250
645

423
494
358
3192
390
390
880
455
496
585
780
910





s-^
rH

"tri

O ^




68
39
43

50
72

42

69
91
82
488 39
403 27
585
585
79
80
1235 58
1170 1 122
/





^^.
rH

tn
tn^





24
60
17

18
28

19

28
48
49
20
20
31
31
19
60






^,
•H

tn
15 £
•z, ^




64
161
72

66
56

106

110
144
163
81
75
91
91
166
280






,-~^
rH

tn
QJ e
r_L, ^




<1.0
113
<1. 0
.04
1.0
1.0
.02
1.0
.02
4.0
< 1. 0
< 1. 0
. 5
4.3
« 1.0
1.0
4.1
2.2






s-^
t 	 i
>v 	
tn
•-H 6
a -^

38
82

220
100
140
1320
200
80
204
95
66
145
225
215
80
40
155
240
495
880






^-^
rH

>* tn

CO ^




85
37
26
41
35
40
82
37
46
63
93
48
55
47
56
63
78
138






^^
	 >
V.
f>o tr>
O E
Z C-




6.4
6.0
7.1
12.0
7.9
11.4
18.3
8.4
31
6.1
9.7
5.6
8.4
10.8
8.0
18.9
.93
7.7

(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock: A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Tesl Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/1 as CaCOg.
10
o
-------
Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA



c
o
•H
JJ
(0
O
O
I~I
TOWNS
L6aaa2
L6aaa3
L7bbb
L7bcc
LSbcc
.8bba
L9bbb








(U
W
CD
HIP


S
S
0
Ir
DS
TOWNSHIP
2dbd2
2aca2
2aca3
2abdl
2dbd
2ddb
2abc
2dad
2cbb
2cbc
Lldba
lldcd
llaab
0
PS

PS

Ir
Ir
Ir
Ir
PS
0
0
A

jf"|
4J
Oi
0; 4-1
Q (U
0)
rH HL,
rH
QJ C
3 -H
17 1


22
7.2
30
35





M-l
O (U
H
CU Ot
| > c
fTJ fTJ
Q CO
40RTH, RA^
4- 5-73
6-11-73
4- 4-73
4- 4-73
6- 6-73
6- 2-72
5-18-72
(U
c_l
d
j_)
15
£j
0)
P>[ X~N
6 O
tt> o
EH ^
GE 6
15
15
15
12
14


17 NORTH, RANGE 7
41^
32 2

32

35
37
30


39
33
36
6- 6-73
6- 2-72
4-25-73
6- 2-72
4-25-73
6- 2-72
5-24-72
8-17-71
3- 2-73
4- 4-73
6- 6-73
6- 6-73
4- 5-73
14

18

16


18
16
15
14
14
16









re
a
WES1
7.5
7.0
7.4
7.2
7.0
7.4
7.5
a>
o
c.
CJ 03
•H -U t~*
M-H U to
•H 3 O
0 T3 rC
OJ C E
cx o a
C/D CJ ^~
? INDIAh
2000
2000
620
1550
1025
1050
1100



0]
w
(U
H C
05 T)
4-J t^
O m
EH rc
f MERII
620
740
285
340
325
365
240


r0
 CO rH tJI
O -H O S
EH P 0) ^-<
DIAN
1300
1300
403
100
660
572
700
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.0
7.4
7.2
7.4
7.2
7.4
7.7

7.3
8.1
/.O
7.0
7.2
1850
925
950
1050
325
900
900
850
1100
580
7000
12250
1240
500
310
400
380
340
346
356
387
410
210
1300
1850
400
1203
925
617
588
536
568
616

792
377
4550
7963
806





^^
rH

tn
ia 6
CJ -^

136
70
76
50
50



110

60

51


104

56
205
400
82





^-^
•H

tn

S ^

64
58
26
51
20



52

37

27


32

20
92
140
49





^^
iH
^•s,,^
tn
rQ £^
2 ^^

220
177
16
226
157



130

74

71




56
1309
2490
164





^-^
rH

tn
(D g


<1.0
< .2
1.0
cl.O
.2

.08

2.1
.04
0.2
0.0
0.8




4.0
< .2
2.6
50





^^
rH

tJI
rH P
O ^

470
425
47
302
175
12.1
149

100
86
72
77
80
86
88
70
138
33
2350
4150
107





^^
i
->Ss^
,-j. ^
o ^
CO v_x

83
120
28
63
108
71
56

230
46
19
66
19
61
67
125
125
13
200
490
128





^^
i
—
ro &1
O £


1.4
5.1
7.5
3.7
.13
.7
14.7

.05
29
2.9
56. 5
2.0
0.0
6.5


3.6
.1
.05
.09
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial; 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) ToUl Hardness expressed in mg/l as CaCOj.
-------
                                 Table A-2 (continued).   WATER QUALITY DATA



C
o
•H
4J
fO
0
O
.-3








O)
CO
Z3
TOWNSHIP
Lladcl
.lade 2
Lladdl
Lladd2
Llaaal
Llaaa2
Llaadl
Llaad2
Llaad3
Lldaal
.Idaa2
Lldaa3
Llbbdl
Llbbd2
Llbbd3
Llbabl
Llbab2
Llbab3
Llbad

S

A

PS

PS


D


D
D
D

rC
4J
ft
0) 4->
Q Q)
QJ
rH U,
rH
o) q
S -H




M-l
O (U
r-l
cu a
-LJ e
ro 03
Q 03
0)
f-i
3
iJ
1)
f-i
CU
Q^^-N
e o
 /—x
4n O CO
•H 3 O
O TD rC
CU C E
ft O >
w o ^r



to
CO
0)
rH C
T5 *O
•U f-i
O ro
E-.3C


T3
0)
>
r-4 V) ^
rH O TD rH
ITJ tO -H \
4-) (0 H tn
O -rl O 6
EH P CO v^
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.8
7.2
8.1
7.8
8.0
7.2
7.3
7.8
7.3
7.4
7. 7
7.8
7.5
8.0
7.6
/.fa
7.4
7.3
7.4

1300
4500
1300
1300
1300
800
1100
1200
1100
4700
3800
5500
700
700
800
700
720
7300
1750

385
885
315
385
286
320
390
362
420
740
625
720
228
272
250
204
270
960
520


2925
354
845
686
520
680
734
115
2952
1320
3575
456
352
520
488
468





,-^
rH
V^
tn
rrj E
a ^

82
169
91
85
74
80

86
82

158
157

81
68

i 65
4745 ! 148
1137

1 96
i
i
i





<^-^
rH
^X^
tn
tn e.
s^-

44
90
21
45
26
20

37
46

56
70

18
25

20
81
50






^—^
rH
^^
tn
ro 6
•z.^


770

840
167
66

109
116


1130

35
59

86
1908
216






/— N
rH
"•s^
tn
0) g
Ul ^-s


1.0

1.5

1.0
.14

4.0
0.0

4.0
0.0

<1.0
.04
<1.0
<1.0
1.0






/—^
•H
^s.
tn
rH 6
0 ^

125
1350
140
120
215
44
83
105
66
1452
1050
1725
55
32
72
77
60
2100
290






y*~N
rH
\
•=t tn
o e
CO O-

240
95
245
85
93
40
97
115
70
194
230
85
61
33
38
56
23
555
183






^_^
rH

rO bl
O 6
^,•0

.09
.05

.20
1.05
.07
0.0
1.18
.09
0.0

.25
11.3
17
.43
15
.88
< .02
.1

(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: O = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/l as CaC03.
vo
ro
-------
                                Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA



c
o
•H
4-1

CX
0) 4->
Q  6
03 tn
Q CO

co o ;>



(O
(0
0)
rH C

H (0 X-N
rH O T3 rH
(fl CO v-l \
4-> CO rH tn
0 -H O 6
EH Q CO v^
WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
7.9
7.2
7.6
7.4
7.4
7.6
7.3
7.5
7.5
7^5
7.0
3.3
7.8
B.I
1000
1400
950
2300
1400
900
900
1300
1100
860
990
1700
1900
1400
WEST INDIAN
6.7
7.1
7.2
5.8
7.1
1300
800
1400
800
650
367
460
420
470
2951
400
338
300
278
390
300
170
205
316
MERII
385
420
520
190
310
554
910
618
1495
910
585
652
845
720
559
644
1105
1235
716
im
845
520
910
520
423





X-s
rH
\
tn
m e
O v^

86
100
99
110
79
58

76

88
55
45
129
86

113
68
90
70
52





x~^
rH
\
tn
tne
&^

38
51
32
48
27
35

33

37
28
20
65
25

54
32
50
35
18





X-N
rH
\
tn
to £
55 ^

61
134
46
258
153
78

170

59
102
360
1000
177

107
89
170
72
100





* — \
rH
\.
tn
CD g
CL, \^

0.0
cl.O
1.0
el.O
<1.0
< .5
.04
1.0
0.12
<1^H
. 5
1.0
17.5


1.0
1.0
2.4
1.0
17.2





s~^
iH
"•s^
tn
rH g
o ^

66
210
106
660
265
83
88
230
176
40
120
390
455
230

260
70
170
120
30





X-N
iH
*s^
<* tn
o e
CO -^

68
75
53
70
43
117
116
40
100
58
71
10
63
85

53
56
258
28
20





x~s
rH
\
f^l CD
O 6
25 N-X

.53
.31
10.60
.93
2.08
.11
1.3
.10
0.0
.41
65
.87
31
.66

1.5
2.3
4.9
6.4
2.2
(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation; M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/l as CaCOj.
LO
-------
Table A-2 (continued).   WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS
3aab
3cbd
4bbbl
6bbb
7aac
7ddd
7ccc
8dcc
LOdac
LObcc
L2ccc
L4cdc
LSbaa
L6ccd
L7aab
L7bbc
L7bbb
L7bad
LScdc
?0abb
?0ccal
?0cca2
22bbc

a
0) -U
Q 0)
0)
H U,
rH
Q) C
S -H
18
45
69
45
30
.03
90
93
.00
67
58
90
41
L20
66
80
L43
<4-<
O 
-------
                                Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
0)
W
TOWNSHIP
53bbb
55baa
DS
Ir
TOWNSHIP
,9bcc
!8bcb
Slabb
54bbb
54cbc
55ddd
S
DS
D
D
DS
D
TOWNSHIP
56bdc
56cdc

A
A

*:
4->
0.
0) 4J
Q 0)

35




104
45
54
48
158
98

52
146

rH~
tn
t»e
S ^




62
28
42
23
55
44

12
38

s-~*
H
tn
to S
2 *-s


34

270
112
186
57
44
109

73
45

^
tn
0) 6
fjj ^-S




5.6
1.0
<1.0
<1.0
< .2
1.0




H
tn
•H 6
0 C-

50
37

510
110
220
35
1050
180

20
226

/—^
rH
<=t tn
0 S
CO ^-s

24
38

40
88
18
19

20

8
18

s~\
rH
<<~> tn
§ 6
2 ^^

7.8
24

10.9
.40
29
4.6

< .20

11
141

(1) D = Domestic; S = Stock; A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal; In = Industrial: 0 = Observation; T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/1 as CaCOy.
VO
tn
-------
Table A-2 (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA



c
o
•H
4J
<0
O
O
J








(U
co
:u
TOWNSHIP
>6ddd
>6adb
>7abc
>9bbb
51baa
Slaac
51ccd
51dddl
51ddd2
52baa
52ddc
53ddc
54ccc
55bbbl

D
DS
S
S
0
D
S
S
0
0

A
DS
0

£
4-J
a
(U 4->
Q Q)

rH U,
rH
(U C
S -rl




H-H
O OJ
•H
(u a,
J-1 e
as
Q)
b
3
4->
03
Pi
0)
Oj^-X
e o
Q) 0
EH ^









X
ft
18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST
70
90
80

54
57


36
63

57
70
61
i
4-26-73
3-21-73
3-21 73
3-21-73
6- 7-73
4-26-73
3-21-73
4-24-73
6- 7-73
6- 7-73
4-24-73
4-24-73
4-24-73
6- 7-73

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RAN
55bbb2
55ccc
55dcb

S !
D 1
S
i
TOWNSHIP
Iddb
labd
DS
D
4-26-73
4-24-73
4-25-73

18 NORTH, RAN
68
48
7-10-45
9- 9-45
16
14
16
16
14
17
15
15
13
14
16
17
17
14

GE 6.
16
17
17

GE 7
18
18
5.9
7.1
7.1
6.8
6.5
/.3
6.9
7.4
7.0
7.0
7.4
8.0
7.1
9.0

WES1
7.2
7.0
7.0

WEST


O)
o
c
O  ^~-
>4H U CO
•H 3 O
O TD rC
 f-i
O (T3
EH K


13
0)
>
rH 10 '•^
rH O TJ rH
CO W -H \
o-> w H tn
0 -H 0 6
EH O w ^
MERIDIAN
280
260
310
225
250
240
320
240
350
350
260
140
250
600

MERII
580
440
340

MERID
720
254
390
455
520
488
286
390
341
390
406
520
585
1625
552
923

HAN
1170





s~\
•H
\^
tn
03 g
O ^

35
63
68
60
22
43
50
39
39
35
44
35
44
6.5


118
1007 i 83
520

IAN
1290
434
j 68
1
1
1
198
1 72





*r~*
.-i

tn
tn E
S ^

16
25
33
21
12
17
19
15
18
22
20
7
20
42


50
47
19


55
18





s*~\
•H

tn

o e
"^ -^

5.3
14.0
5.6
11.3
7.2
0.6
15.2
2.2
3.4
2.2
1.3
< .02
. 35
1.05


2.3
.60
1.2


120
55
(I) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon; Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal: In = Industrial: 0 = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(2) Total Hardness expressed in mg/l as CaCOg.
-------
                                Table A-2  (continued).  WATER QUALITY DATA
Location
TOWNS
8ddd
LOdda
L3acc3
L3dbc
L3ddd2
L3baal
L3baa2
LSaac
>laad
?3bab
24cdc
24aab
24abb
25ccc
26aaal
26aaa2
26bcdl
26bcd2
26ccc
26dcc
27aad
28cdb
(U
co
a
HIP
DS
D
PS
PS
PS
D
D
DS
DS
DS
A
DS
A
DS
A
DS
Ir
S
Ir
D
x
-P
a.
0) 4->
Q (U
0)
•H m
H
0) C
S -H
18 1
24
70
50
59
50
45
45
53
42
70
50
60
45
27
35
55
42
20
31
m
O (U
rH
0> Di
4J e
m oj
P) CO
VORTH, RA1>
10- 4-50
3- 6-73
12-13-50
3-20-73
3-20-73
3- 6-73
7-10-45
10- 5-50
4- 5-73
3- 5-73
7-10-45
3- 5-73
7-10-45
3- 5-73
7-10-45
3- 2-73
5-18-72
4- 4-73
4- 4-73
4- 4-73
4- 5-73
10- 4-50
Temperature
(°C)
fGE 7
15
16
16
15
17
16
16
14
17
15
17
17
18
16
15
15
15
13
X
ft
WES']
7.4
6.8
6.7
7.0
8.1
7.9
6.8
6.9
7.6
7.4
7.1
7.7
7.5
7.3
Specific
Conductance
(^/mhos)
? INDIA!
534
750
1300
650
1000
500
809
610
450
1050
1100
700
625
940
1200
3900
540
314
Total
Hardness
[ MERU
206
205
424
215
315
180
121
330
280
125
491
350
419
330
248
220
222
130
165
500
200
125
Total
Dissolved
Solids
(mg/1)
)IAN
326
488
825
423
650
325
246
578
397
293
1250
683
740
715
596
492
396
611
780
2535
351
202
s-^
r-t
tn
35
58
114
58
79
32
91
58
144
102
50
42
39
70
55
35
*^\
•H
tn
tn e.
S ^
15
34
20
29
10
25
28
32
40
30
19
21
38
20
9.1
^^
rH
^CTi
5 e
^ ^
25
95
43
87
22
42
36
172
79
101
245
200
98
41
15
fit
1.0
1.0
1.0

2.9
1.0
7.8
1.0
s-~^
H
&>
•H e
0 C>
53
125
250
100
125
88
19
36
34
38
381
375
216
300
108
78
65
211
238
1050
48
4
H
•* tn
o e
CO ^
20
45
25
53
88
29
12
13
20
44
36
44
39
35
49
39
36
38
35
193
16
14
X-N
rH
t^ tn
o e
2 ^-s
17
12.6
26
6.9
8.9
6.6
28
162
6.8
2.9
59
7.2
12
16.1
26
43
.15
2.5
.41
10.7
50
(1) D = Domestic: S = Stock; A = Abandon: Ir = Irrigation: M = Municipal; In = Industrial: O = Observation: T = Test Well Drilled and Plugged.
(21 ToUl Hardness expressed in mg/1 as C«CO;j.
to
-------
Table A-3   WATER QUALITY DATA - OIL FIELD BRINES
                        98
-------
Table A-3.  WATER QUALITY DATA - OIL FIELD BRINES

c
o
•rM
4->
rt
0
o
J
TOWNSHIP
Sec. 3

Sec. 23

Sec. 26

Sec. 27

Sec. 27
Sec. 33
Sec. 28

TOWNSHIP
Sec. 15
Sec. 11

TOWNSHIP
Sec. 11

Sec. 4
Sec. 22

Sec. 17





Field
GO
c
•H
o
3
TJ <0
0 G
t-> O
ex M



Well
Depth
in Feet
17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN ME
Crescent-
Lovell
Crescent-
Lovell
Crescent-
Love 11
Crescent-
Lovell
Crescent
Crescent
Crescent

17 NORTH, R
Crescent E
Lowrie W

Layton

Layton

Layton

Layton

Layton
Wilcox
2nd
Wilcox
\NGE 3 WE
Layton
1st
Wilcox
18 NORTH, RANGE 4 WE
Hull

Lovell N
Lovell

Lovell
Middle
Layton
Tonkawa
Upper
Layton
Layton
4945-5008

4992-5012

4967-4932

4876-4937





ST INDIAN MI
4713-4809
6119-6123

ST INDIAN ME
4730-4746

4018-4200
4645-4800

4608-4616




Date of
Sample
RIDIAN
7-14-53

7-14-53'

7-14-53

7-14-53

4-10-68
4-10-68
4-10-68

RIDIAN
7-14-73
7-14-73

RIDIAN
5-18-54

5-18-54
10-17-55

5-18-54



r~\
,—1
BO
to E
U ^

10700

17100

15500

12500

23945
19072
21008


18100
14600


18000

16500
18000

16400



rH
to
e.oe
5H **-*

1290

2700

2480

1840

0
0
0


2340
2540


3480

3140
3210

2970



/ — \
t-H
bO
rt e
*^ ^— ^

52300

67500

69700

61400

57770
50615
52905


83200
70100


76800

76400
79000

78800



i— i
00
r-H 6
CJ '-'

103000

142000

142000'

122000

155334
144340
143810


167000
141000


160000

156000
163000

159000
i— i
1 — .
60
^

i— i t/) i~~,
rH O 13 «H
rt w -H \
4J t/1 i— I fcO
O -H O 6
H Q W^

167763












270888
228801


258669

252157
263510

237372
-------
                           Table  A-3.   WATER  QUALITY  DATA  -  OIL  FIELD  BRINES

£
O
•H
4->
rt
o
0
_!






Field
GO
c
•rH
u
3
T3 4)
0 C
!-. O
d, M




Well
Depth
in Feet





Date of
Sample
TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN
Sec. 2

Sec. 2

Sec. 3
Lovell

Lovell

Lovell SE
1st
Layton
Middle
Layton
Layton
4630-4676

4828-4833

4820-4850
11-22-54



9-1-53



f 	 N
f-H
bO
rt 6
U^-^

18500

13600

10900



/^-^
i— i
w>
to e
^r ^-^

3100

1850

1520



/^~>
i— i
GO
oj e
2: *—>

78300

60200

54800



/ 	 N
r-H
t)0
r-l S
u ^-^

161000

121000

1080000
t—t
•~^
bfi
E
V 	 '
m
O
u
X

88

24

61



/— \
rH
a t>0
o e
to » — *

1970

1810

205
'O

rH t/> ^— v
r-H O "Tl rH
CtJ  -H ^^
+J 10 rH bO
O -H O E
HQ W^

262958

198484

175496
o
o
-------
Table A-4   RESISTIVITY STATIONS
                101
-------
Table A-4.   Resistivity Stations
"A"
Spac
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
140
Resist! itv Stations
2-1
1680
1424
1392
1280
1144
1008
913
787
688
595
554
500
445
407
374
350
337


















•2-2
3064
229b
1992
1920
1868
1785
1680
1664
1548
1424
1320
1210
1134
1050
P90
920
950


















2-3
39
62
76
81
84
91
99
105
106
103
97
90























2-4
60
77
90
98
100
95
92
88
87
86
85
84























2-5
400
166
94
84
90
100
106




























2-6
346
317
361
402
418
428
432
429
422
418
395
375























2-7
46(1
349
291
250
225
210
202
200
199
107
193
188
187
191
197
207



















2-8
636
326
205
159
123
120
123
127
130
134
138
141
144
147
151
155



















2-0
476
34 S
230
IPO
186
167
157
158
152
153
151
136
148
147
148
214
156
154
158
162
165
164
165
162
165
166
167
166
164
164
166
163
165


2-10
776
544
343
218
140
114
108
109
112


























3-1
464
416
388
528
300
275
258
238
218
l'J4
172
155
140
129
120
114
110
104
100
93
88
84
80
75
75
75
76
76
77
78
80
81



3-2
166
14
22
17
17
IS
20
22
24
2b
27
30
31
^ 3
35
36
37
40
41
45
46
47
51
56
55
54
53
53
54
55
56
58



3-3
S12
451
38-1
320
272
212
181
153
133
120
112
106
100
100
100
iOO
99
100
101
101
102
103
104
104
105










3-4
232
234
410
— ^— ^— — _
357
320
298
280
258
247
235
252
229
228
726
~23~1
221
	
224
221
217
215
214
— —i
215
212
211

_
~"
~" i ..—






3-5


	



1 	
	

	 	 —
	 	 — .
	 .
	
	
1
	 	 .
	 .
	 • — _
	 • — ..
	 _
	
1 	 • — „
	 ^
	 —
	 — -_
	 	 	
	 —






           102
-------
Table A-4.   Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
Si
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136.
140
Re isstivitv Stations
3-6
141
82
60
S3
57
70
85
89
88
83
77
65
bO
S6
54
50
48
46
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37









3-7
283
172
139
127
123
120
116
107
100
90
82
77
70
65
62
54
49
46
43
















3-8
126
117
114
114
120
120
119
116
112
105
98
89
80
73
67
6:
59
56
53
51
48
47
45
43
42
41
40
39
39
39
39
39



3-9
740
374
226
116
142
124
116
107
96
93
90
88
81
85
72
82
85
75
68
AS
64
64
66
64
60










3-10
232
236
216
216
216
264
210
197
193
188
178
166
158
146
142
132
127
117
100
105
100
92
85
79
75
72
69
68
64
68





3-11
1012
677
569
509
473
452
430
407
375
345
310
276
244
212





















3-12
720
326
168
108
77
57
48
4S
46
45
44
42
43
45
48
S3
57
58
58
57















3-13
328
216
175
153
143
140
144
147
145
139
130
120
113
107
103
100



















3-14
525
292
222
17o
139
129
119
104
97
93
82
70























3-15
322
293
284
186
166
153
143
136
129
123
117
109
103
98
92
86



















3-10 ;-17
S28 440
sC2 381
311 240
17-J 13S
90 j R2
50 58
36 I 43
31 37
29
30
36
34
32 ! 35
34








_














36
37
40
41
42
43
44
45
44
48
46
47
48
47









3 - 1 F ! 3 - 1 9
11
13
16
18
JO
:9
45
58
63
66
24 7Z
2fi




























79













3-20
41t
717
8S3
*8S
«r>o
668
520
116
351
306
280
266
261
257
2S2
246
M'O
235
229
223






















!




|
                103
-------
Table A-4.   Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
140
Resistivity S ations
3-21
988
723
470
237
177
135
US
107
109
114.
120
127
134
142
148
155



















3-22
376S
2496
1200
730
350
220
191
190
179


























3-23
372
420
449
464
488
535
567
589
609
631
653
677
6S5
687
687
685
687


















3-24
333
318
377
402
424
444
479




























3-25
220
187
132
110
107






























3-26
332
334
252
































3-27
544
498
432
358
302
242
209
195
187
181
177
174
173
170
168
166




,.•














3-28
408
349
348
J94
462
511
560
582
608
620
647
672
676
678
6S4
653



















3-29
324
344
337
330
329
330
331
333
332
328
523
316-
307
297
287
275



















3-30
76
115
157
200
24S
300
335
346
351
350
345
337
3/4
310
297
285
275
266
258
253















4-1
261
235
213
192
175
158
146
137
134
133
137
136
130
117
113
112
113
114
116
114
113
111
108
103
103
104
104
104
107
110
113
116



4-2
367
250
194
180
174
174
164
158
162
157
153
1S2
150
145
146
141
142
141
143
134
141
139
136
137
135
133
134
131
K9
126





4-->
434
275
228
234
?39
222
213
205
205
193
191
'178
176
167
160
154
150
144
132
141















4-4
659
420
283
220
181
180
ISO
180
178
170
164
160
142
140
144
150
143
140
126
















4-5
646
483
360
280
224
192
16*
152
145
125
it:
103
100
100
109.




















                104
-------
Table A-4.   Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
140

4-6
246
H'6
148
148
146
142
137
is:
124
123
121
121
120























4-7
49
38
56
64
60
76
73
89
75
102


























4-8
95
76
78
83
84
84
84
82
82
83
























1 	

1-9

B8K
410
25S
ITS
132
118
105
95
90
85
81
80
79
78
75
75
71
71
70
















4- id
321:
20:: !
1000
465
:.i«
167
123
111
104
,103
IflJ
98
93
90
89
8ft
86
86
87
85














	 1
Re
a-n
329
318
304
29-1
298
305
297
291
278
287
281
278
272
27S
271
251
762


















i«; t i v
4-12
344
33b
I?*
25,1
21
214
210
207
200
190
180
172
170
165
160
is:



















ity St
4-13
195
204
202
1'14
}
18~
ISO
175
170
166
163
i:9
155























at; ion 5
4-14
188
2J8
24:
:24
214
208
204
196
189
183
175
168
























4-15
? ™ I
311
256
198
175
158
145
134
126
118
113
107
























4-16
333
290
243
176
150
138
132
124
118
111


























4-17
210
177
184
190
206
210
m
216
214
210
203
220
215
198






















4-]~8
308
27P
237
176
157
1-48
144
141
139
137


























4-19
29*
j
184
i:~
10T
100

9:
89
87
86


























4-20
536
486
*57
437
387
303
255
233
201
18 S
,172
162
153
146
140
134
131
12.7
125
120
119
117
116
115
112
119
US
102





— -4
!
                105
-------
Table A-4.   Resistivity Station?
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
140
Resistivity Station1
5-1
164
178
184
19-
212
216
226
221
219
315
215
210
201
197
191
18J
176
168
163
156
151
146
143
141
138










5-:
916
505
340
348
212
181
164
150
140
131
13-1
3292
653
355
222
165
134
115
10ft
95
13 2 14-1 15-1 lib-i 16-2 ip-i ;o-i :i-i 2i-: : i - 3 :i-i :i-r- !
484
84
45
39
39
40
40
42
42
226 1320
172
140
122
105
92
85
82
81
77 41 80
123 65
115
107
59
16
99 55
9:
88
86
83
SO
77
71
68
68
65
65










55
56
56
57
57
58















R."i2
425
304
250
240
211
179
164
168
44 78 154
46 76
47
48
49
4«
31
52
54
57





68 ;
6.1
M
63
63


63 !
64
65





48 ?0
4400
2800
16J8
1150
740
410
i:s
110
95
82
73
64
•'880 4;,f
40>.ifi
ig^n .v-e J20hs i "'J
218 4-0
"J") J368
23''1 IZO 31.1 | 3-2
773
460
280
180
10°
5"
ino
:o4
120
129
253
212
183
"J4
137
254
3fi4
s s 4 n
:f u.
." E 3 ' 1 " S 4
2JO 1900 lltO
25" IR1 7?7
96
52S 10'.-
ifts :>i:
152 :96
115
130
17?
176
irs
\f<~
9: ! 142 im 279 KS | lf-C
R4 14|)
77
13C
~r 158
15: -6f. It-!
125 240 191
119 21T- 121
6- 'is-, i::
— »— 	
202 !.-••
6D (•.- \ 162 123 187 101
.'P f'< S~
58
57 i 165
36 167
































!







55 169
5J> 173
55
56
5*
57
58

1:4 175 is:
i;5 163

135
103
400
:in
7- J
34T
4JfS
!6G i 4f?
116
ss-:
r« 1 3Sp
15: P8 3T3
]4P 92 ~g'\
14(i P3 24f !
14^ :•:
!3f 94
i:--. : i>7
i": 99
35i ! 129
149 305
112 32'
17f.
167
166




j

133
i:;
125


123


115
106
96



j







-3:>
211
:on
l.-S








! j



1 1


i •
\ i
1












1














|



i



1















1



              106
-------
Table A-«.  Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
140
Resistivity Station*
22-1
323
414
381
232
1?9
1S3
124
101
84
"4
69
68
h6
65
64
t.2
59
56
52
47
4S
46
s:
64

22-2
3856
21(,'1
850
4::
200
89
50
91
87
83
80
75
75
70
(>S
67
65
63
60
54
5
55
5r
t>5

i


















22-3
2568
1776
1160
826
680
S62
425
283
195
160
145
150























22-4
9S8
400
212
142
114
100
82
73
72
72
71
71
7.2
74
74
75



















22 S'1
189
236
245
237
214
192
165
143
127
113
93
84























22-6
17
32
42
45
44
44
46
48
49
SO
51
53























22-7
ni6
1376
1090
755
470
307
218
165
126
102
93
88
23-1
167
154
135
117
114
114
116
118
117
115
112
108
81 107
82
"2
75
73-
75
71
70
73
68
71
67
65










105
105
106
104
102
98
u*















23-2
628
37.V
360
320
28R
283
2-56
231
221
205
193
188
178
170
160
150
HI
133
128
121
115
112
109
105
100










23 3
388
154
117
97
83
75
69
64
63
62
62
62























:;-4 :s-i
5160
53f>
30?6 420
1900
1040
si:
226
145
102
83
73
67
63








354
294
266
^i27
26-1 26-2 26-3
292 252
322 1~2
288
243
212
1R6
189 161
16?
isn
130
12i
110
99
92
85
8*
8'
87
«7
83
. 89























146
129
114
99
96
93
94
95
09.
103


















130
105
88
~8
73
69
66
63
62
62
63
64
>.5
67



















360
33f>
300
245
204
154
i:0
104
93
R2
75
71
68
66
dS
65
64


















               107
-------
Table
Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
s:
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
1C8
112
J16
120
IC4
•28
132
136
140

26-4
240
270
203
144
111
92
78
69
64
60
58
57
56
54
S3
52


















i

26-5
182s
577
305
245
211
I7t
155
134
121
lO-
go
.93
89
87
67
92
91
8J
86
79
.) *.
71
7(i
7 Z
84
yo
81 |
s:
so
'• 1



i


26-6
680
248
:o:
176
162
150
143
141
140
138
135
131
127
124
122
121
121-
121
121
120
119
119
11?
119
i:o
122
125
129








26-7
142
105
80
66
t>0
5"
57
58
61
61
60
M>
~ j
76
76
7.7
80
82
S4
85
86















26-8
2084
1504
298
189
148
117
118
1CS
103
103
105
104
107
108
112
115
117
120
121
120
120
123
126
124
120
i:9
134
130








26-9
7S4
719
58S
278
ISO
135
114
99
95
93
90
90
90
91
94
96
101
105
no
113
11-
11-.'
117
114
ns
122
126
12"
131
133
i:;
I3c




:o-io
2316
1302
S'O
291
174
118
10(1
33
93
81
S3
81
81
38
8?
90














'





27-1
195
115
97
85
-69
52
44
. 41
45
44
40
48
44
43






















27-2
2080
944
460
280
195
167
143
124
112
102
91
S '
66
58
59
58
48
44
40
42
J3
-,C
41
34
49











27-3
241
141
133
132
133
13?
136
138
141
144
147
ISO
155
154
154
154
153
153
151
150
149
148
146 •
145
142
131
131
132
128
125
'l27.
119




27-4
748
578
413
278
227
18.1
140
103
83
75
70
"I
-o
67
02
64




















; 27-5
301
23S
:os
190
171
1SS.
:43
132
!41
140
;39
159
127
124
113
'.'4
99
77
90
94
81
66
6-1
71
68
65
69
72
7 ;>
78
75
73




27-6
62
69
41
43
48
55
59
68
70
-f)
69
66
70
81
88
93
97
99
100
100
100
100.
99
98
97
94
92
89
87
8f,
86
86




27-7
1000
IS"
147
135
131
129
130
130
132
1J2
135
133
137
135
137
137
136
134
131
109
111"
108
108
107
1M
5?,
59
60
62
61
5?





2--B
1428
1360
950
021
412
276
2C1
149
IIS
ins
92
82
76
77
72
67
60
f><>
62
















               108
-------
Table A-4.
Resistivity St«t1ons
Space
t
8
12
16
20
Z4
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
S6
60
64j
68
72
76
83
34
83
S2
96
100
104
108J
112
116
120
124
123
132
136
140
"
Resi^tivitv Stations
28-1
1428
1360
953
621
412
276
20]
149
118
105
92
82
76
77
.72
67
69
6b
62
















28-2
28-3 j 28-4
2172 1488
221*1 328
[
1560
682
571)
S64
56-1
114
118
100
162
215
239
258
179
17-
262
2«:
255
246
222
202
345
267
257
214
196
185
175
166
160
153
153
154
154
154






I
t






















IfcOO
68V
4 S3
408
361
334
315
297
237
278
277
265
262
255
241
225



















28-5
195
255
264
240
214
183
163
147
133
123
120
115
113
116
115
28-6
256
67
66
107
107
147
114
148
146
M4
155
155
153
147
143
US 137
116
117
118
119
118














154
134
131
130
130
126
124
126
118








28-7
319
148
1-9
146
160
150
ISO
148
143
140
138
125
114
107
109
111
106

















	

28-8
28-9
76 ! 2396
38
96
103
113
116
119
120
121
120
J21
122
124
125
125
1 17
128
127
122
117
113
112
110
110
109










59R
370
240
182
1T0
156
147
152
146
141
131.
130
154
134
123
110
116
109
J04
114
99
92
93
8?
88
89
92
86
79
R'.»
88
54
93

28-10
212
28-11 28-12
48 ! 246
i
322 57
324
304
266
230
194
188
176
170
167
161
1S3
146
139
134
131
126
119
115
110
104
100
99
93
91
89
88
91
93
• 90
89
93
95
98
64
64
240
197
154
59 119
54
52
51
51
52
51
50
46
42
38
37
36
36
36
91
76
S3
55
47
42
43
42
40
, 39
39
39
40
41
! Ji















4»
43
42
44
42
47
46
47
47
52
48
48
f


28-13
2144
1*9,2
980
926
340
2Z.O
148
98
73
56
47
46
50
54
56
57
57
56
55
53
50
45
40
32
32
S3
34
36
35
34
33
32



23- 1
480
266
221
218
218
225
230
225
220
214
209
205
201
195
189
183
177
170
163
161
If il
157
130
142
134










29-2
880
432
247
195
ITS
169
148
137
132
129
119
119
114
112
103
105
110
104
97
97
m:
98
•>•!
90
87










               109
-------
Table A-4.
             Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
52
36
40
44
48
S2
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
o4
89
92
Hesistivi'tv Station-;
so-;
332
217
211
210
192
177
161
148
l')6
119
114
107
96
87
82
"5
67
65
65
64
a:
£S
54
96 i 52
100
104
El

31-1
908
394
301
294
292
278
277
271
252
244
240
:34
225
215
203
197
193
33-2
432
1
191
197
214
224
233
234
234
229
222
211
200
192
192
192
187
ISO.
184 156
174 17S
)70 176
1 *> fc 1 " 2
31-5
262
196
191
17S
200
193
210
218
216
214
228
:H
217
21!)
214
•201
196
195
185
32-1
32-2
1200 !>92
J7S
216
187
175
172
167
167
167
166
161
1S3
149
142
132
12S
IIP
114
112
143:
276
259
268
rs?
32-3
1-.IO
'60
600
651
600
540
300 480
187 -126
181
173
162
160
148
149
139
124
119
118
116
172 113 | 104
ion
390
400
418
430
430
410
362
350
74 n
330
518
32-4
550
508
436
3S2
313
238
213
233
200
200
182
159
156
156
163
156
16"
135
133
118
179 1C.) 64 .7'.)
160 1 171 184
1SS 163 107
135 1E3
155 143
,
i
IP? :
112 ! :
llo
120
124 j
12S
132
13ft







162

1C5
100
96

77 'TO
29 i i



1


i






i -,
J40 '



C93

27'l •'
23'> '•
:oo

i
175
1
160 i
160












i


K.O
166



1
32-5
800
600
4'0
3"0
320
.'84
244
290
290
285
280
275 -
270
260
250
245
240
22b
::o
:o8
:;i4
199
!94
188











33-1
228
116
132
145
155
163
170
174
178
182
185
187
186
183
177
170
163
16:
162
163
160
157
33-2
•95
290
240
203
33-3
872
655
52P
410
175 350
155
144
133
136
133
129
123
120
115
110
104
101
99
98
38
308
237
243
2.90
211
200
187
175
16S
160
151
140
130
i:s
120
':•- ' us
96 | ir.
150 ?4 i ill)
142
158
133
128
123
120
117
114
110



T/3 106
92
or.
SF
31


89
?(! .
90
•>!









33-4
186
180
175
168
162
153
147
138
135
131
130
125
123
121
119
116
115
112
110
108
105
10J
10:
98
97
?S
99
OK
97
96
95
94



34-1
680
282
200
146
156
166
175
183
188
190
189
183
177
178
175
1S4
156
152
151
i:.o
l?0
150
149
149
MS
139
154
129
126
123
120
117



54-2
203
295
308
314
507
77S
21P
224
211
202
19S
186
182
177
172
169
16-'
loP
155
1S2 '
io" :
143
138 j
13:
i:~
i n
ii"
119
us
116
114
112



              no
-------
Table A-4. Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
S2
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
140

34-3
1327
1040
762
453
343
249
195
157
125
108
93
75
63
66
59




















31- 1
(>GO
414
271
200
IbS
153
lt-0
145
145
140
138
139
137
135
130
133
132
129
123
117















34-5
732
212
126
112
106
105
101
96
97
84
79
31.
71
67
73
64
64 '
67
62
60
62
63
57
58
51










34-0

188
80
36
25
27
33
38
42
45
47
49
49
SO
52
54
55
57
59
61















34 -S
S32
460
290
152
110
85
68
58
52
.48
46
47
48
48
48
48
49
52
57
63















34-')
1128
505
505
194
143
119
100
92
84
76
72
79
75
75
69
64
67
67
68
70
6-1
6S
71
67
68










35-1
174
198
206
230
256
282
303
320
335
345
351
352
356
366
370
370
373
370
369
365
558
348
533
323
315
302









35-2
sno
410
228
197
18S
133
181
180
179
177
171
160
140
124
115
113
11.7
125
129
132
133
133
132
130
127
127
115
129
123
118
119
119
125.
130
136
35-3
480
293
243
205
179
16U
145
137
132
125
120
114
110
108
107
106
107
107
107
107
107
107
106
106
106
112
118
124
124
12S
126
126



35-4
792
238
205
170
130
99
118
116
97
83
84
70
75
75
70
77






34-5
756
526
318
206
160
133
118
112
107
102
94
84
78
74
72
72
71
6P
66
63
6?
62
! «••'
65











66
65
66
6S
69
70
71
73



35-6
241
128
104
95
98
105
115
127
136
139
144
145
145
144
144
143
143
143
142
139
122
110
80
56
50
S4
58
62
90
215
140
165



35-7
215
256
234
202
160
143
,130
120
115
105
100
94
90
89
88
88
90
92
95
96
97
PR
9S
!>9
100
106
112
118
117
115
114
113



35-8
508
520
432
288
226
182
155
131
110
92
81
74























-------
Table A-4.   Resistivity Stations
"A"
Space
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
S2
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
92
96
100
104
108
112
lib
120
124
128
132
136
140
Resistivity Station-:
35-9
248
264
214
170
143
124
113
110
112
116
120
i:s
127
125
123
122
125
130
138
148
150
145
138
134
134
133
1.34
134
132
u:
130
128



35-10
Hid
740
502
427
330
298
273
243
212
198
182
175
163
155
147
140
134
126
130
131
135
158
120
10S
159
123
156
141
141
133
154




35-11
5148
2624
2484
1104
910
922
680
486
536
294
241
239
281
251
263
285
298
299
48
274
34














35-12
1076
1656
997
866
738
636
557
483
436
384
3S2
325
304
283
268
255
241
225
213
205
202
195
190
185
181










35-13
840
1000
890
762
680
.612
5fr5
528
485
452
425
400
373
343.
325
305
295
280
268
255
245
232
223
211
105
194
190
187







35-14
119"
69
"> t
72
74
81
86
92
88
88
88
87
88
87
90
90
90
90

















56-1
17X4
738
31?
190
148
128
114
101
92
8S
82
79
7b
72
6c
65
67
71
76
79
79
77
'?'!
76
T •*










56-2
289
729
137
100
90
86
70
70
72
76
80
























36-3
207
135
114
114
118
120
122
121
123
120
117
115"
115
114
113
113
113
113
112
111
109
111
114
116
117










36-4
2004
1496
1272
979
800
638
630
528
436
379
314
253
240
214
184




















36-5
652
422
230
160
131
127
130
136
141
144
148
148
149
149
149
149
148
148
148
148





















. 148
145
143
140
138

































































































































,


               112
-------
Table A-5   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
             113
-------
                    Table A-5.  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	_	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

2bbdl-Observation well drilled under this project.   Cased to 45
      feet with 1% inch galvanized steel pipe, 3 foot well point,
      and gravel packed.  Water sample analyzed; electric log also
      available.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface
      1012 feet; Bedrock 967 feet.

      Brown sandy soil                            2           2
      Sand, brown, thin streak of coarse sand     6           8
      Clay, light gray, brown sandy clay          4          12
      Sand, brown to red, med to fine             8          20
      Sand, brown, med to very fine              12          32
      Sand, brown, med to coarse                  8          40
      Sand, brown, very coarse, fine gravel       5          45
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red

2cacl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for litho-
      logic purposes, no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea
      level elevation:  Land Surface 998 feet; Bedrock 967 feet.

      Soil, sandy, brown                          2           2
      Silt, red brown to brown                    3           5
      Clay, light gray and red brown silty clay  11          15
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  4

3abbl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for litho-
      logic purposes, no casing installed.  Electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1011 feet-
      Bedrock 971 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown           13          13
      Clay, reddish brown                         7          20
      Clay, reddish brown and gray                5          25
      Clay, gray                                  8          33
      Sand, very coarse; gravel                   7          40
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red             4

3abb2-0bservation well developed under this project.  Cased with
      41 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel
      packed.   Water sample analyzed, electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1015
      feet; Bedrock 975 feet.

      Brown sandy soil                            2           2
      Sand, red brown, fine                      11          13
                            114
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3abb2-continued

      Clay, red brown, sandy                      8          21
      Clay, light gray and light brown           10          31
      Sand, med to very coarse, some gravel       9          40
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  2

3bbal-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1028 feet;
      Bedrock 959 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                           9           9
      Clay, light brown, silty                   12          21
      Sand, fine, reddish brown                  16          37
      Clay, brown to gray                        17          54
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, gravel        15          69
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red             1

3bbbl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level
      elevations:  Land Surface 1030 feet; Bedrock 970 feet.

      Sand, fine, light brown to red brown        5           5
      Silt, light red brown, clayey               5          10
      Sand, fine to very fine, light red brown   13          23
      Clay, red brown to light gray (caliche
            like) hard                            2          25
      Sand, very fine, light red brown            6          31
      Clay, reddish brown                         7          38
      Sand, fine, reddish brown                   2          40
      Sand, med to coarse                        10          50
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel             10          60
      Permian Bedrock, clay and siltstone, red    1

3bccl-Test well drilled under this  project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Electric  log available.
      Estimated mean  sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1027 feet;
      Bedrock 976 feet.

      Sand, fine to very fine, brown             10          10
      Sand, fine to very fine, red  brown and
            red brown clay                         5          15
      Sand, fine to very fine and silty red
            brown to  brown                       10          25
                            115
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description                   Thickness     Depth

TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3bccl-continued

      Sand, fine to very fine, red brown to
            brown                                 5          30
      Sand, fine to very fine, clayey, red
            brown to brown                        5          35
      Clay, red brown, sandy                      4          39
      Sand, med to coarse, brown some fine
            gravel                                6          45
      Sand, fine to coarse, brown                 6          51
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  2

3cdcl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1013 feet;
      Bedrock 976 feet.

      Silt, brown, clayey                         5           5
      Silt, brown                                 5          10
      Silt, red brown, to brown, clayey           5          15
      Silt, light red brown                       5          20
      Sand, med to very fine, brown               7          27
      Sand, coarse to very coarse                10          37
      Permian Bedrock, clay and siltstone, red    3

3dacl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level
      elevations:  Land Surface 1005 feet; Bedrock 988 feet.

      Silt, red brown to brown top foot sandy
            soil                                  5           5
      Silt, red brown to brown                    7          12
      Sand, med to very coarse, brown             5          17
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                 3

4baal-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1048 feet;
      Bedrock 988 feet.

      Soil, soft brown clayey sand                2           2
      Clay, gray                                  7           9
      Sand, fine to med, brown, thin streaks
            of yellow to brown clay              11          20
      Silt, fine sand, reddish brown              5          25
                            116
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	|	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

4ba a1-cont inued

      Sand, fine, silty, light brown             11          36
      Sand, fine to med, light brown              4          40
      Sand, fine, light brown                    16          56
      Sand, coarse                                4          60
      Permian Bedrock, redbeds                    5

4ddcl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level
      elevations:  Land Surface 1020 feet; Bedrock 978 feet.

      Sand, very fine, silty brown                5           5
      Sand, very fine, some clay, brown           5          10
      Sand, very fine, brown to red brown        10          20
      Sand, very fine, brown to It. red brown    10          30
      Sand, med to very coarse, brown, some
            gravel                               12          42
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                 3

Sccal-Irrigation well developed in Cimarron Terrace.  Information
      from water rights file of Earl Wilson.  Estimated mean sea
      level elevations:  Land Surface 1009 feet; Bedrock 984 feet.

      Top soil, sandy loam                        3           3
      Clay, subsoil                               2           5
      Sand, fine                                  3           8
      Sand, water bearing                         8          16
      Gravel, coarse                              4          20
      Clay, tan                                   1          21
      Gravel, coarse                              4          25
      Permian Bedrock, redbeds

Bbabl-Irrigation well developed in Cimarron Terrace.  Information
      from water rights file of Charles Wilson.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface  1005 feet; Bedrock 921
      feet.

      Top soil and sand, fine                    12          12
      Sand, fine with thin clay layers           18          30
      Sand, med, with flakes of shale            42          72
      Sand, very  coarse                          12          84
      Permian Bedrock, redbeds
                             117
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	       Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

6aacl-Irrigation well developed in Cimarron Terrace.   Information
      from water rights file of Harry Wilson.   Estimated mean sea
      level elevations:  Land Surface 1026 feet; Bedrock 988 feet.

      Top soil                                    2           2
      Clay                                        6           8
      Clay, fine, sandy                          11          19
      Sand, fine                                  7          26
      Clay                                        0.5        26.5
      Sand, coarse                               11.5        38
      Permian Bedrock, shale                      3

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

6cccl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level
      elevations:  Land Surface 1162 feet; Bedrock 1115 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown to yellow                 3         0
      Clay, gray, sandy                           2         3
      Clay, gray, sandy, reddish brown, fine
            sand                                  5         5
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown     37        10
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red, brick red
            and maroon                           13

14dccl-Test well drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1116 feet;
      Bedrock 973 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown to reddish brown          5           5
      Sand, fine, brown                          15          20
      Sand, fine to very fine, clayey, brown     12          32
      Clay, gray                                  6          38
      Clay, reddish brown                         5          43
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  2

14dddl-Test hole drilled under this project.  Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level
      elevations:  Land Surface 1100 feet; Bedrock 967 feet.

      Road fill, sandy clay, brown and red        2           2
      Sand, fine, silty, yellow brown             3           5
                            118
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Deptn

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

14dddl-continued

      Sand, fine, brown                           8          13
      Clay, gray to tan                           5          18
      Clay, brown to reddish brown               13          31
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  1

16dccl-Test hole drilled under this project. Drilled for lithologic
      purposes, no casing installed.  Electric log available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1115 feet;
      Bedrock 1050 feet.

      Sand, brown, fine                           1           1
      Sand, brown to reddish brown, fine          9          15
      Clay, gray brown                            6          16
      Sand, fine, reddish brown                   4          20
      Sand, fine, red to brown                    5          25
      Silt, brown to red brown, clayey           13          38
      Sand, fine to very fine, red brown         27          65
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  5

16dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing  installed.  Electric  log available.  Estimated mean
      sea  level  elevations:  Land Surface 1109 feet; Bedrock 1077
      feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                           5            5
      Clay, reddish brown,  to brown,  some light
            gray  color                            6          11
      Clay, reddish brown,  silty                  9          20
      Clay, brown to red brown                   12          32
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  3

19aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing  installed.  Electric  log available.  Estimated mean
      sea  level  elevations:  Land Surface 1092 feet; Bedrock 1008
      feet.

      Sand, brown to tan, fine                    3            3
      Sand, silty, some clay, brown to  tan        2            5
      Sand, fine to very fine, brown  to red
            brown                                23          28
      Sand, fine to very fine, some silt and
            red  and gray clay                      9          37
                            119
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  TjOGS
      Formation Description
Truckness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

19aa a1-cont inued
      Sand, fine to very fine,  silty red brown    6
      Sand, very fine to silty, red, some clay    3
      Sand, very fine, red to red brown          19
      Clay, brown, fine sand                      5
      Clay, brown to gray, some coarse sand       5
      Sand, very coarse, some small gravel
            Thin clay layer at 75'  possibly
            \" thick                              5
      Sand, very coarse, some small gravel        4
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone and shale, red   3
               43
               46
               65
               70
               75
               80
               84
19aad-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea leval elevations;
      Land Surface 1090 feet; Bedrock 1002 feet.
      Sand, fine, light brown                     5
      Sand, fine, buff to tan                     5
      Sand, very fine, reddish brown             11
      Clay, gray and reddish-brown,  sandy,
            carbonaceous                          8
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown             6
      Sand, fine, buff to tan                     6
      Clay, light buff brown, silty                3
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown,
            carbon                               16
      Clay, light brown, tough                    3
      Clay, red to reddish brown                 14
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel             11
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick  red     1
                5
               10
               21

               29
               35
               41
               44

               60
               63
               77
               88
19add-Test hole drilled under this  project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1080 feet; Bedrock 999 feet.
      Sand,  fine,  light brown to tan,  some brown
            clay                                  5
      Sand,  fine,  reddish brown                  10
      Sand,  fine,  tan to light brown             10
      Sand,  very fine, brown, thin layers  brown
            clay                                  5
      Sand,  very fine, tan to gray,  silty          5
      Sand,  very fine, tan to light  brown  to  red
            brown                                15
                5
               15
               25

               30
               35

               50
                           120
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description
                                       Thickness
          Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

19add-continued
      Sand, very fine, reddish brown to tan,
            carbon particles
      Clay, red, gummy
      Sand, coarse to fine, brown
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red,
            hard
                                           12
                                            7
                                           12
           62
           69
           81
19dad-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surfaces 1077 feet; Bedrock 1000 feet.
      Sand, fine, brown                           4
      Clay, dark gray, light gray on bottom       5
      Sand, fine, light gray                      8
      Sand, fine, light gray, gray clay streaks   8
      Sand, very fine, silty, light gray         16
      Clay, light gray                            9
      Sand, fine to med, light gray to light
            brown                                15
      Sand, fine to coarse, light gray to
            brown                                 5
      Sand, very coarse                           6
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red    1
                                                        4
                                                        9
                                                       17
                                                       25
                                                       41
                                                       50

                                                       65

                                                       70
                                                       76
19dcc-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1073 feet; Bedrock 997 feet.
      Sand, fine yellow to brown, silty           5
      Sand, fine, light brown, yellow-brown clay  5
      Sand, fine to very fine, tan                5
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown,
            carbon                               17
      Clay, reddish brown, sandy                 11
            fine, light brown to red brown        2
            gray, some sand, soft                10
            fine, tan to buff                     3
Sand,
Clay,
Sand,
Clay,
Sand,
            gray, yellow, light brown, some sand  6
            coarse to fine, some fine gravel
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red
12
 1
 5
10
15

32
43
45
55
58
64
76
                            121
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
      Formation Description
Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN  MERIDIAN

19ddcl-Test hole drilled under this  project  for  lithologic purposes,
      no casin installed.   Electric  log available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land  Surface  1079 feet; Bedrock 1001
      feet.
      Sand,  fine,  brown to tan
      Clay,  gray,  silty
      Sand,  fine,  gray, some clay
      Sand,  fine,  tan to light brown
      Clay,  light  gray, silty
      Sand,  fine brown
      Sand,  fine,  brown, tnin streaks  of gray
            and red clay
      Sand,  coarse, brown streaks of gray and
            red clay
      Sand,  coarse, fine gravel
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red
    7
    3
    5
   25
   13
    7
    5
    8
    2
  7
 10
 15
 40
 53
 60

 65

 70
 78
20bdbl-Irrigation well developed in the Cimarron Terrace.  Information
      from water rights file of Norman Shutler.   Estimated mean  sea
      level elevations:  Land Surface 1090 feet; Bedrock 978  feet.
      Top soil
      Sand, fine
      Clay
      Sand, fine
      Clay
      Clay, fine, sandy
      Clay
      Sand, fine
      Clay
      Sand, med to coarse
      Sand, coarse, clean
      Permian Bedrock, redbeds
    3
   17
   10
   12
    7
   11
    1
   11
    3
    6
   11
    2
  3
 20
 30
 42
 49
 60
 61
 72
 75
 81
 92
21cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.   Electric log available.   Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1051 feet;  Bedrock 989
      feet.
      Sand, fine to medium, tan to gray           5
      Sand, fine to med, tan, some silty clay
            streaks                              12
      Sand, fine tan                              4
      Silt, some fine sand, tan                  10
               17
               21
               31
                           122
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description     	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

2Icccl-continued

      Sand, fine, tan to reddish brown            9          40
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, tan           15          55
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, tan to yellow  7          62
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, hard            3

21ccc2-Crescent City well Number 1 developed in Cimarron Terrace.
      Information from water rights file.  Estimated mean sea
      level elevations:  Land Surface 1058 feet; Bedrock 990 feet.

      Sand, light brown                          20          20
      Sand, fine, brown (quick sand)             28          48
      Gravel, coarse, water                      20          68
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone                  3

21cdcl-Crescent City well Number 2 developed in Cimarron Terrace.
      Information from water rights file.  Estimated mean sea
      level elevations:  Land Surface 1056 feet; Bedrock 968 feet.

      Sand, light brown                          30          30
      Sand, brown                                35          65
      Gravel, coarse                             25          90
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                 3

22aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing  installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean
      sea  level  elevations:  Land Surface 1137 feet; Bedrock 1095
      feet.

      Earth fill material, sandy clay             1           1
      Silt, brown,  clayey                         5           6
      Sand, fine, yellow clay                     4          10
      Sand, fine, silty, reddish brown            6          16
      Clay, reddish brown                         4          20
      Silt, reddish brown                         4          24
      Clay, reddish brown, silty                  6          30
      Silt, reddish brown                        12          42
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  3

22daal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes,
      no casing  installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean
      sea  level  elevations:  Land Surface 1130  feet; Bedrock 1059
      feet.
                            123
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

22daa1-cont inued

      Sand, fine, brown                           5           5
      Sand, fine, tan to red brown light         15          20
      Sand, fine, light brown                    17          37
      Clay, gray and brown                        5          42
      Sand, brown to reddish brown, silty        18          60
      Clay, red brown and yellow, sandy           5          65
      Sand, very fine, reddish brown              6          71
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red             4

23cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean*
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1112 feet;  Bedrock 1051
      feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                          10          10
      Sand, fine, yellowish brown to tan         10          20
      Some clay about 19' (Maybe dry silt)
      Sand, fine, light brown to reddish brown    5          25
      Sand, fine, brown, silty                   10          35
      Sand, fine, silty, brown with gray streaks 15          50
      Sand, fine brown                           11          61
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  4

25baal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean*
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1083 feet;  Bedrock 1057
      feet.

      Sand, fine, brown to reddish brown         11          11
      Silt, brown, clayey                         2          13
      Sand, fine, brown                           7          20
      Sand, fine, brown, carbon                   6          26
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  9

26aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean*
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1055 feet;  Bedrock 1035
      feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                           5           5
      Sand, fine, silty, brown to reddish brown   5          10
      Sand, fine, silty to clayey,  reddish brown  6          16
                            124
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

2 6a a a 1-cont inued

      Clay, gray, sand, reddish brown             4          20
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  4

26abbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric logs available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1078 feet; Bedrock 1056
      feet.

      Sand, fine, reddish brown                  11          11
      Clay, brown to reddish brown               11          22
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  3

27addl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric logs available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1060 feet; Bedrock 1015
      feet.

      Sand, fine brown                            4           4
      Clay, brown                                 1           5
      Sand, fine, brown                           7          12
      Permian Bedrock, clay, reddish brown,
            firm and red, siltstone, red         33          45

27bbal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1100 feet; Bedrock 1060
      feet.

      Soil, sandy brown                           1           1
      Silt, brown,  clayey                         7           8
      Sand, fine, brown                           2          10
      Sand, reddish brown,  fine                   6          16
      Silt, reddish brown,clayey                 10          26
      Clay, gray, slightly  silty                  4          30
      Clay, gray  and reddish brown, silty         6          36
      Clay, reddish brown  (tough to drill)        4          40
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red, tough         14

27cbbl-Test hole  drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes,
      48 feet of  4% inch  PVC well casing slotted, and  gravel packed.
      Electric  log  available.  Estimated mean sea  level elevations:
      Land Surface  1036 feet; Bedrock  992  feet; Water  Table 1026.


                            125
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description
Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

27cbbl-continued
      Sand, very fine,  brown
      Sand, fine, light brown
      Sand, fine to silty,  some small amount
            of clay
      Sand, very fine,  brown to gray brown
      Clay, gray
      Sand, fine to coarse, gray to brown some
            small gravel
      Permian Bedrock,  shale and siltstone, red
    5
    5

    5
    5
    9

   15
    6
  5
 10

 15
 20
 29

 44
27cdcl-0bservation well developed under this  project for water  level
      data and water quality data.   Well cased to 34 feet  with  4^
      inch ID in PVC well casing, slotted with gravel pack. Water
      analysis available.  Estimated mean seal level elevations:
      Land Surface 1024 feet; Bedrock 978 feet; Water Table 1014
      feet.
      Sand, med to fine, light brown              5
      Sand, med, brown to light brown             5
      Sand, fine to coarse, light brown,  thin
            layer of clay about 17'               10
      Sand, med to coarse, tan, clean             5
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, yellow to
            brown, gravel                         8
      Permian Bedrock, clay,  red                  1
                5
               10

               20
               25

               33
28aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.   Electric log available.   Estimated mean*
      sea level elevations:   Land Surface 1060  feet;  Bedrock 1000
      feet.
      Sand, fine, brown                           2
      Clay, gray                                  6
      Sand, fine, brown to yellow or tan         14
      Clay, gray, light, sandy,  yellowish brown "   6
      Sand, fine, brown streaks  of silty clay,
            gray                                 12
      Silty, red to reddish brown, soft drilling
            some clay                            20
      Permian Bedrock,  siltstone, red,  hard
            drilling                              5
                2
                8
               22
               28

               40

               60
                            126
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
      Formation Description
ThicKness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

28abbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.   Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1068 feet;  Bedrock 991
      feet.
      Sand, brown, fine                           7
      Silt, fine, sand, brown, clayey             8
      Silt, fine, sand, brown to gray             5
      Silt, brown, clayey                        16
      Silt, clayey, reddish brown, soft           4
      Sand, fine to very fine, brown to red-
            brown                                14
      Clay, gray, tought to drill                 3
      Clay, silty, gray to brown                  5
      Sand, coarse to very coarse                15
      Permian Bedrock, clay                       3
                7
               15
               20
               36
               40

               54
               57
               62
               77
28cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1048 feet; Bedrock 990
      feet.
      Sand, fine brown                            5
      Sand, fine to silty, red brown to brown    10
      Silt, brown, very fine sand, some brown
            clay                                 13
      Clay, light gray, some red brown clay       6
      Sand, fine to coarse, yellow brown, some
            fine gravels                          6
      Sand, med to very coarse, brown, fine
            gravels, clean                       18
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                  2
                 5
                15

                28
                34

                40

                58
 28cddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
       no  casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
       Land Surface  1032 feet; Bedrock 992 feet.
      Sand,  silty, brown to gray                   5
      Sand,  silty, brown                         10
      Sand,  silty, brown clay about 19'            5
      Clay,  gray, sandy                            4
      Sand,  coarse to very coarse, some gravel   16
      Permian Bedrock, redbed                      4
                 5
                15
                20
                24
                40
                            127
-------
              Table fl-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS

                                              Thickness
Formation Description
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

29bcc-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1063 feet; Bedrock 998 feet.
      Sand, fine to med, tan to light brown       5
      Sand, very fine, light red brown            5
      Sand, fine, tan to red, carbon flakes      29
      Clay, reddish brown soft                    5
      Sand, coarse, light brown to reddish
            brown                                 6
      Sand, coarse, yellow                        5
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel, tan         9
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon,
            hard                                  1
                                                        5
                                                       10
                                                       39
                                                       44

                                                       50
                                                       55
                                                       64
29cacl-Irrigation well developed in Cimarron Terrace.   Information
      for water rights file of Lea  Mize.   Estimated mean sea  level
      elevations:  Land Surface 1058 feet;  Bedrock 987  feet.
      Sandy loam
      Clay
      Sand, fine
      Sand, fine to med
      Sand, coarse, well sorted,  clean
      Permian Bedrock,  redbeds
                                            3
                                            9
                                            5
                                           26
                                           28
                                            1
  3
 12
 17
 43
 71
29daal-Test hole drilled under this  project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.   Electric log available.   Estimated  mean*
      sea level elevations:   Land Surface 1062 feet;  Bedrock  995
      feet.
      Sand, very fine, brown                      5
      Sand, very fine, light brown                5
      Sand, very fine, red brown                  6
      Clay, red brown, some sand,  fine            4
      Sand, very fine to silty,  red brown        18
      Clay, red brown                             2
      Sand, fine to coarse, yellow to brown      10
      Sand, med to coarse, brown,  fine gravel    17
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                  3
                                                        5
                                                       10
                                                       16
                                                       20
                                                       38
                                                       40
                                                       50
                                                       67
29dcl-Irrigation well developed in Cimarron Terrace.   Information
      from water rights file of Jerry Johnson.   Estimated  mean
      sea level elevations:   Land Surface 1061 feet;  Bedrock 985
      feet.
                           128
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description
Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

29dcl-continued
      Soil, sandy
      Sand
      Clay
      Sand
      Clay, sandy
      Sand, coarse clean
      Permian Bedrock, redbeds
    3
   15
    6
   12
   20
   22
    2
  3
 18
 24
 36
 56
 78
31abal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1059 feef, Bedrock 995 feet.
      Sand, fine, tan                             3
      Clay, light brown, sandy                    2
      Sand, fine, light brown to reddish brown    8
      Clay, light gray, yellow, light brown,
            sandy                                 4
      Sand, fine to very fine, tan to light
            brown, carbon flakes                 32
      Clay, reddish brown, sandy                  2
      Sand, fine reddish brown                    4
      Sand, fine to coarse, light brown           7
      Permian Bedrock,  shale, red to maroon       1
                3
                5
                13

                17

                51
                53
                57
                64
 31add2-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no  casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface  1056 feet; Bedrock 981 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown to  light brown            5           5
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown,
            yellow, red, reddish brown, some
            carbon
      Clay, brown and gray
      Clay, gray to light yellow gray, some
            gravel  and shell  fragments
      Clay, light gray and  reddish brown
      Sand, very coarse, and  fine gravel, tan
             to  light  brown
       Permian Bedrock,  shale,  red  to maroon,
             hard
    32
     3

    15
     5

    14

     1
  37
  40

  55
  60

  74
                             129
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness      DeptTT
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3Ibbal-Irrigation well developed in Cimarron Terrace.   Information
      from water rights file of Cecil Schnelen.  Estimated mean sea
      level elevations:  Land Surface 1060 feet;  Bedrock 979 feet.

      Top soil                                    2           2
      Sand, red                                  13          15
      Clay                                        5          20
      Clay, sandy                                 9          29
      Sand, red                                  13          42
      Clay                                       13          55
      Sand, coarse                                5          60
      Sand, coarse, clean                        21          gl
      Permian Bedrock, shale                      2

31cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      well developed with 52 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing,       '
      slotted and gravel packed.  Water analysis available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1045 feet-
      Bedrock 995 feet; Water Table 1021 feet.                    c>

      Sand, med to very fine, light brown, buff
            and tan                              15          -^5
      Sand, med to fine, light red brown, carbon
            flakes                                5          ^Q
      Sand, fine, red brown                      12          32
      Clay, brown, light gray brown, silty,
            soft                                  2          34
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown to
            red brown                             6          ^g
      Sand, fine light brown                      4          44
      Sand, med to coarse, light brown            6          5Q
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to maroon,
            gray streaks                          4

32bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea  level elevations-   *
      Land Surface 1061 feet; Bedrock 991 feet.

      Sand, fine,  light brown                    10          10
      Sand, fine to med,  light brown              5          15
      Sand, fine to med,  reddish brown, thin
            clay streaks                          12          27
      Clay, reddish brown                         2          29
      Sand fine to very fine, reddish brown      16          45
                           130
-------
              Table A-5  (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
      Formation Description
Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

32bbbl-continued
      Clay, brown to reddish brown
      Sand, very fine
      Sand, coarse to very coarse
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red
   12
    6
    7
    5
 57
 63
 70
32dccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.   Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1050 feet;  Bedrock 986
      feet.
      Sand, fine, reddish brown, to brown        30
      Sand, fine, reddish brown, thin streaks
            clay                                  5
      Sand, fine, reddish brown                   5
      Sand, fine, reddish brown, clay at 57'     17
      Clay, brown                                 3
      Sand, med                                   4
      Permian Bedrock, redbeds                    3
                30

                35
                40
                57
                60
                64
21cbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1080 feet; Bedrock 991
      feet.
      Sand, fine to very fine, gray to tan       10
      Sand, fine to very fine, brown to red
            brown                                15
      Sand, fine to very fine, black particles   10
      Sand, very fine, red brown                 30
      Clay, red brown to brown                    7
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, fine gravel   17
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red             6
                10

                25
                35
                65
                72
                89
 33aabl-0bservation well developed under this project, cased to 64
     .  feet with  1% inch galvanized steel well point and gravel
       packed.  Water analysis available.  Estimated mean sea level
       elevations:  Land Surface  1058 feet; Bedrock 993 feet; Water
       Table  1023 feet.
       Sand,  fine  to med,  light brown               5
       Sand,  fine  to very  fine, light brown  to
             tan                                   5
       Sand,  fine  to very  fine, red  brown, silty   10
                10
                20
                            131
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness      DeptK"
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

33aabl-continued

      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown      6          26
      Clay, reddish brown and gray               16          42
      Sand, fine, light brown                     3          45
      Sand, med to very coarse, light brown      20          65
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red

33cbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.   Electric log available.   Estimated  mean'
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1054 feet;  Bedrock  977
      feet.

      Sand, very fine, red brown                  6          6
      Silt to very fine sand, red brown to
            brown                                16          22
      Clay, brown, silty                          9          31
      Sand, med to fine, brown                    5          35
      Clay, gray and brown                        6          42
      Sand, fine, brown, intermixed with
            brown clay                            9          51
      Sand, fine to coarse, brown                 4          55
      Sand, med to coarse,  brown                 22          77
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                 3

33cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.   Electric log available.   Estimated  mean*
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1050 feet;  Bedrock  994
      feet.

      Sand, fine, brown, clean                    5           5
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown,
            to brown                             10           15
      Sand, fine to very fine, red brown; black
            carbon material                      15           39
      Sand, very fine, red  brown to brown;  thin
            clay lenses                          12           42
      Sand, med to very coarse, brown            14           55
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                 2

33ccd-Test hole drilled under this project  for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean  sea level  elevations-   '
      Land Surface 1000 feet; Bedrock 967 feet.
                           132
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description
                                 Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

33ccd-continued

      Sand, fine to med, black to dark gray and
            light brown, few coarse sand pebbles   5           5
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown to
            tan                                  10          15
      Clay, dark gray                             1          16
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown,
            carbonaceous                          4          20
      Clay, dark gray, gummy                     10          30
      Sand, med to coarse, brown                  3          33
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red    4

33dbb-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1060 feet; Bedrock 983 feet.
      Sand, fine to very fine, brown, light
            brown                                20
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown,
            carbon                               17
      Clay, reddish brown, yellow, tan, sandy     6
      Sand, fine reddish brown, some clay        12
      Sand, fine to med, light brown              6
      Sand, fine to very fine, streaks of red,
            uellow, and brown clay                9
      Clay, red, reddish brown and yellow         5
      Sand, coarse, tan to brown to red brown     2
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red, dark red,
            maroon, white, hard                   3
                                                 20

                                                 37
                                                 43
                                                 55
                                                 61

                                                 70
                                                 75
                                                 77
 33dda-0bservation well developed in Cimarron Terrace for water
       level data and water quality data.  Well developed with 83
       feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.
       Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1045 feet;
       Bedrock 965 feet.
       Sand,
       Clay,
       Sand,
       Clay,
       Sand,
       Clay,
       Clay,
       Sand,
fine, light brown                     6
light brown, sandy                    4
fine to very fine, light brown       11
reddish brown, sandy                  9
very fine, reddish brown              5
reddish brown, silty and fine sand   20
light brown, silty                   12
coarse, brown to tan                  3
   6
  10
  21
  30
  35
  55
  67
  70
                            133
-------
              Table fl-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS

                                              Thickness
Formation Description
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

33dda-continued
      Sand, very coarse,  fine gravel,  light  brown 10
      Permian Bedrock,  siltstone,  red,  maroon,
            white,  hard                            5
                                                       80
34aaal-Test hole drilled under this  project  for  lithologic  purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1048 feet;  Bedrock 982  feet.
      Sand, fine,  brown to reddish brown          5
      Sand, brown  to reddish brown, clayey         5
      Sand, fine,  brown to reddish brown          5
      Sand, tan to gray, fine to silty,  clayey     5
      Sand, fine to very fine, tan to brown       5
      Sand, fine to very fine, tan to brown,
            clay streak                           5
      Silt, tan to brown,  clayey                 15
      Sand, coarse, clean, fine gravel           15
      Sand, very coarse                           6
      Permian Bedrock,  siltstone                  5
                                                        5
                                                       10
                                                       15
                                                       20
                                                       25

                                                       30
                                                       45
                                                       60
                                                       66
34aabl-Test hole drilled under this  project for lithologic  purposes.
      Test hole converted to observation well by installing 74  feet
      of 1% inch steel pipe with sand point and gravel packed.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:   Land Surface  1058 feet;
      Bedrock 984 feet; Water Table  1027 feet.
      Sand,  fine, brown                           5
      Sand,  fine, light brown                     3
      Clay,  red brown,  brown, sandy              12
      Sand,  fine to med, light brown to red,
            clayey silt                          11
      Clay,  red brown,  silty                     16
      Sand,  fine, light brown                     3
      Sand,  med to coarse, some fine gravel      10
      Sand,  very coarse, some gravel              4
      Clay,  yellow                                1
      Sand,  very coarse to fine                   9
      Permian Bedrock,  clay and siltstone,  red    1
                                                        5
                                                        8
                                                       20

                                                       31
                                                       47
                                                       50
                                                       60
                                                       64
                                                       65
                                                       74
34abbl-0bservation well developed under this project for water level
      data and water quality data.   Well cased to 60 feet with 43^
      inch ID in PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.   Water
      analysis available.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1045 feet; Bedrock 989 feet;  Water Level 1011
      feet.
                            134
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description
                                       Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

34abbl-continued
      Sand, fine to med, brown                    5
      Sand, med, light brown                      5
      Sand, med to fine, silty, light brown to
            red brown                            10
      Sand, fine, silty, red to brown some clay   5
            red brown to gray                    13
            med to coarse, brown to tan           2
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, fine gravel,
            yellow brown                         16
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone                  1
Clay,
Sand,
  5
 10

 20
 25
 38
 40

 56
34addl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1030 feet; Bedrock 974
      feet.
      Sand, brown, fine
      Sand, fine, red to brown
      Clay, reddish brown and brown
      Sand, med to coarse, brown
      Sand, very coarse
      Sand, very coarse, some gravel
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to
            varigated
                                            5
                                           11
                                           12
                                            7
                                           15
                                            6
   5
  16
  28
  35
  50
  56
 34babl-Test  hole  drilled under this project for lithologic purposes.
       Converted to observation well,  installed 43 feet of 1^ inch
       steel  casing with well point, gravel packed.  Electric log
       available.  Estimated mean  sea  level elevations:  Land Surface
       1023 feet;  Bedrock 980 feet; Water Table 1019 feet.
       Sand,  brown,  fine                           5
       Sand,  brown,  fine,  some  silt and  clay        5
       Sand,  brown,  fine                           5
       Sand,  very fine to  silt, some  clay           5
       Sand,  tan, med to fine,  clean                5
       Sand,  tan, med to coarse                    5
       Sand,  brown,  very coarse                    5
       Sand,  brown,  very coarse to fine  gravel     8
       Permian Bedrock, redbeds                    2
                                                        5
                                                       10
                                                       15
                                                       20
                                                       25
                                                       30
                                                       35
                                                       43
                            135
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness     Depth"
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

34bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes,
      installed 63 feet of 1% inch steel casing with well point  for
      water level and water quality data.   Electric  log  and water
      analysis available.   Estimated mean sea  level  elevations:
      Land Surface 1052 feet; Bedrock 990 feet; Water Table 1021
      feet.

      Sand, fine, brown, clay about 4T             5            5
      Silt, fine sand                             5           10
      Silt, brown                                 5           15
      Silt, brown to gray                         8           23
      Sand, fine, brown                           4           27
      Silt, reddish brown, clayey                13           40
      Sand, fine to med, clean                    5           45
      Sand, med to very coarse, clean             5           50
      Sand, med to very coarse, clean,  fine
            gravel                                5           55
      Sand, yellow to brown, very coarse          7           62
      Permian Bedrock, redbed                     3

34bdd-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1010 feet; Bedrock 977 feet.

      Sand, very fine, brown light, brown
            and red                               5            5
      Sand, very fine, light brown                7           12
      Clay, light reddish brown, sand fine to
            coarse                                3           15
      Sand, fine to coarse, light red brown       5           20
      Sand,.med to very coarse, some fine
            gravels                               5           25
      Sand, coarse, fine gravel                   8           33
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to brick red,
            yellow gray                           2

34cbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes,
      no casing installed.  Electric log available.   Estimated mean *
      sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1050 feet; Bedrock  987
      feet.

      Sand, fine to very fine, brown to red
            brown                                 5            5
      Sand, very fine, to silty, red brown to
            brown                                33           38
                            136
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

34cbbl-continued

      Sand, very fine, red brown to brown,
            clayey                                2          40
      Sand, very fine, to silty, brown to red
            brown                                10          50
      Sand, med to coarse, brown                  5          55
      Sand, med to very coarse, brown             8          63
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red                 2

34ccbl-Observation well developed under this project, in Cimarron
      Terrace for water level and water quality data.  Water
      quality analysis available.  Installed 69 feet of 4^ inch
      PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.  Estimated
      mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1050 feet; Bedrock
      979 feet; Water Table 998 feet.

      Sand, med to fine, red brown                5           5
      Sand, med, red brown to brown              10          15
      Sand, fine, light brown to tan              6          21
      Sand, fine to silty, some clay red brown   13          34
      Sand, fine to silty, red brown             13          47
      Clay, red brown, silty                      4          51
      Sand, red brown, very fine to silty         5          56
      Clay, red brown to brown, silty             9          65
      Sand, med to coarse, brown to red brown     6          71
      Permian Redbeds, clay, red to maroon        1

34cdcl-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Water quality analysis avail-
      able.  Well cased with 55 feet of 4^ inch  PVC well casing,
      slotted and gravel  packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1028 feet; Bedrock  974 feet; Water Table 1000
      feet.

      Sand, dark  brown, sandy                     4           4
      Clay, red brown,  sandy                     15          19
      Sand, med to fine,  brown  to red            11          30
      Clay, brown to  red                         12          42
      Sand, brown, med  to coarse,  fine gravel    12          54
       Permian bedrock,  clay, red                   1

 34dccl-0bservation well developed  under this  project for water
       level and water quality  data.   Cased with  20 feet of  1%  inch
      galvanized  steel  well casing,  and well point and  gravel
                             137
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

34dccl-continued

      packed.  Water analysis available.  Estimated mean sea level
      elevations:  Land Surface 990 feet; Bedrock 970 feet;  Water
      Table 984 feet.

      Sand, brown, fine                           5           5
      Clay, light brown to gray                   8          13
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, some gravel    7          20
      Permian Bedrock, clay                       1

35ccdl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1000 feet;
      Bedrock 979 feet.

      Sand, medium light brown, clean             5           5
      Sand, medium to fine, brown                 5          10
      Sand, medium to coarse, gray to brown       5          15
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravels, brown      6          21
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone                  4

35dcdl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      Electric log available.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1040 feet; Bedrock 967 feet.

      Soil                                        1           1
      Sand, fine to medium, reddish brown to
            brown                                 4           5
      Sand, fine to medium, brown                16          21
      Sand, red, clay streaks, brown to red
            brown                                 3          24
      Clay reddish brown, some sand               6          30
      Clay, brown to light gray                   9          39
      Sand, reddish brown, clay streaks           6          45
      Clay, red brown and gray                    8          53
      Sand, med to coarse, brown                 20          73
      Permian Bedrock, clay                       2

36bbal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1050 feet;
      Bedrock 1020 feet.

      Sand, reddish brown, fine                   5           5
      Sand, reddish brown to brown, clayey        5          10
      Sand, very fine, brown                      5          15


                            138
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness      Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

36bba1-continued

      Clay, red to brown                          3          18
      Clay, red, sandy                            7          25
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red                 15

36cdcl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1018 feet;
      Bedrock 972 feet.

      Sand, brown, clay top 2T fill               5           5
      Sand, reddish brown to brown, fine         41          46
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

4bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes.
      Converted to well with 95 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing,
      slotted and gravel packed.  Water analysis available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1130 feet;
      Bedrock 1031 feet; Water Table 1107 feet.

      Sand, brown, fine to med                     5           5
      Sand, light brown to yellow, fine to med   10          15
      Sand, reddish brown, fine to med           10          25
      Sand, buff, med  to very fine, some  silt
            and tin clay lens                      5          30
      Sand, brown, med to very fine, carbonaceous  5          35
      Sand, brown to reddish brown, fine  to very
            fine, silty, some clay lenses        25          60
       Clay, red brown, silty                     25          85
       Clay, dark  gray, some gravel near 95       10          95
       Clay, dark  gray; fine gravel, shell
            fragments                              5          100
       Clay, red brown                              2          102
       Permian Bedrock, clay, red  to maroon

 6bbal-Test hole drilled  under  this project tor  lithologic  purposes.
       Converted to  observation well with  66 feet of  4^  inch PVC
       well casing,  slotted and gravel  packed.   Water analysis
       available.  Estimated mean  sea  level elevations:   Land Surface
       1146 feet;  Bedrock 1079  feet; Water Table 1112 feet.

       Sand,  fine  to med,  brown, few pebbles of
             very  coarse  sand                       5            5
                             139
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth~

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

6bba1-cont inued

      Sand, fine to very fine, brown to light
            brown and tan brown clay streaks     10          15
      Sand, fine to very fine, tan some gray
            clay                                  5          20
      Sand, very fine, tan, gray and reddish
            brown, some clay and silt             5          25
      Clay, tan, red, reddish brown, fine
            very fine sand                       15          40
      Clay, red to reddish brown, soft           20          60
      Sand, very fine to med, tan to light
            brown                                 7          67
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon       5

8dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1089 feet; Bedrock 1019 feet.

      Sand, fine light brown, brown and red
            brown                                10          10
      Sand, fine, light brown, some light gray
            brown clay                            5          15
      Clay, red brown, sandy                      5          20
      Clay, red brown, yellow, gray, sandy        5          25
      Sand, med to fine, silt, red brown, some
            red clay                             15          40
      Sand, fine to very fine, red brown to tan   5          45
      Clay, gray to brown,  to red brown, sandy   10          55
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, fine gravel,
            buff to yellow                       15          70
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red   10

lOdccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      Converted to observation well with 45 feet of 4^ inch PVC
      well casing slotted and gravel packed.  Water analysis
      available.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1060 feet; Bedrock 1015 feet; Water Table  1039 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown to light brown           10          10
      Clay, brown, red brown and gray, sandy     10          20
      Clay, brown, silty, tough                  10          30
      Clay, brown                                 5          35
      Clay, dark gray                             5          40
      Clay, dark gray, soft, some gravel          5          45
      Permian Bedrock, clay red to brick red     15


                            140
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	  Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

lOddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1070 feet; Bedrock 1005 feet.

      Sand, fine, light brown, thin clay streak   5           5
      Clay, light brown, sandy                    5          10
      Sand, fine, reddish brown                  10          20
      Sand, fine, light brown, clayey            10          30
      Clay, red brown to brown                   10          40
      Clay, buff to light brown, silty            7          47
      Sand, coarse to very coarse                13          60
      Sand, med, reddish color from weathered
            bedrock                               5          65
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to dark red     5

13dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      converted to observation well with 90 feet of 4^ inch PVC
      well casing, slotted and gravel packed.  Water analysis
      available.  Estimated mean sea level  elevations:  Land
      Surface 1090 feet; Bedrock 1001 feet; Water Table 1056 feet.

      Sand, fine to med,  light brown to buff     15          15
      Sand, fine, buff brown, light gray, silty   5          20
      Silt, light brown, gray, clayey            12          32
      Sand, med,  light brown                      2          34
      Sand, med to fine,  brown to red brown      6          40
      Sand, med to very fine, tan                15          55
      Sand, very  fine, tan; black carbon
            particles                             5          60
      Sand, very  fine, tan                        5          65
      Clay, reddish brown, silty, carbonaceous    6          71
      Sand, very  coarse,  fine gravel, tan        18          89
      Permian Bedrock, clay,  red to maroon,
            s ilty                                 6

 14cbcl-Test hole  drilled  under  this  project for  lithologic  purposes.
      Converted  to observation  well with  63 feet of 43^ inch PVC well
      casing,  slotted  and gravel  packed.  Water  quality  information
      available.  Estimated  mean  sea  level  elevations:  Land Surface
      1070 feet;  Bedrock  1009 feet; Water Table  1039  feet.

      Sand, fine  to med,  brown                     5            5
      Sand, fine, buff to gray, silty              5           10
      Sand, very  fine, buff  to  gray,  clayey      25           35
                             141
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description            "       Thickness      Depth~

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

14cbcl-continued

      Clay, light brown to gray brown, sandy     10          45
      Sand, coarse to very coarse,  very fine
            gravel                               16          61
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to  brick red    2

18cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes.
      Converted to observation well with 29 feet of 4% inch PVC
      well casing, slotted and gravel packed.   Water analysis
      available.  Estimated mean sea  level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1050 feet; Bedrock 1022 feet; Water Table  1023
      feet.

      Sand, fine to med, light brown  to reddish
            brown                                20          20
      Sand, coarse, fine gravel, tan               8          28
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to  maroon,
            silty, mottled gray streaks           2

20aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1026 feet; Bedrock 1001 feet.

      Sand, fine, buff, tan, light brown         15          15
      Clay, brown, sandy                          5          20
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel               5          25
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to  brick red
            to maroon                            10

22cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1030 feet, Bedrock 998 feet.

      Sand, fine brown to light brown            10          10
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown     10          20
      Sand, fine, light brown                    12          32
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to  maroon,
            hard                                  4

27aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:     '
      Land Surface 1055 feet; Bedrock 1011 feet.
                           142
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description	  Thickness      Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 5 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

27 aaal-continued

      Sand, very fine to med,  reddish brown       5           5
      Sand, very fine to fine, red to reddish
            brown                                25          30
      Sand, fine, reddish brown to buff brown    10          40
      Sand, very coarse, some gravel              4          44
      Permian Bedrock, shale,  red to brick red    6

27dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes.
      Converted to observation well with 25 feet of 4^ inch PVC
      well casing, slotted and gravel packed.   Water analysis
      available.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1028 feet; Bedrock 1004 feet; Water Table 1020 feet.

      Sand, fine, light brown to buff            10          10
      Sand, med, light brown                      5          15
      Sand, med to coarse, tan                    5          20
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel, brown       4          24
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red,
            gray mottled                          6

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

2aaal-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Well cased with 42 feet of
      4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.  Water
      analysis available.  Estimated mean sea  level elevations:
      Land Surface 1120 feet; Bedrock  1073 feet; Water Table
      1094 feet.

      Sand, fine to  med, brown                     5           5
      Sand, med to light brown, fine gravel        5          10
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown, silty       6          16
      Clay, light red brown,  sandy                 2          18
      Sand, fine, light brown                     7          25
      Sand, fine to  very  fine, reddish brown      22          47
      Permian Bedrock,  clay,  light  brown to
            reddish  brown  and red  to dark red;
            with red to maroon, mottled, shale   38

 7aaal-Test hole  drilled under this  project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing  installed.  Estimated  mean sea level  elevations:
      Land Surface 1080 feet; Bedrock  1046 feet.
                            143
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness      Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

7aaa1-continued

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    4           4
      Clay, slate gray                            1           5
      Sand, fine, tan to light brown             10          15
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown             8          23
      Sand, fine to coarse, tan                  11          34
      Permian Bedrock, shale, reddish brown to
            brick red, mottled                   11

9aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1089 feet; Bedrock 1020 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown to brown   5           5
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown,
            clay                                  5          10
      Sand, fine reddish brown                   lb          2b
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown,
            clayey                                7          32
      Clay, reddish brown,  and light gray,
            fossiliferous                         4          3b
      Clay, slate gray, to red brown             12          48
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel, reddish
            brown (Permian material mixed
            with gravel)                         15          63
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red brown to
            brick red, mottled                    7

lOccbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1040 feet; Bedrock 1023 feet.

      Sand, fine, dark red                        4           4
      Siltstone, hard, mottled (Permian red
            bed—large bolders washed into
            channel)                              2           6
      Sand, fine, tan                             4          10
      Sand, coarse, light brown                   7          17
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to brick
            red, shaley, mottled                 13

lldddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:    *
      Land Surface 1070 feet; Bedrock 1026 feet.


                            144
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC  LOGS
      Formation Description
Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH,  RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

lldddl-cont inued
      Sand, fine to med,  dark brown               5
      Sand, fine, reddish brown                   7
      Clay, light brown                           7
      Sand, fine to med,  brown                    1
      Clay, buff to reddish brown                 9
      Sand, coarse, brown, some fine gravel      15
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to brick
            red                                   6
                5
               12
               19
               20
               29
               44
12aaal-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      quality data.  Water analysis available.   Well cased with
      78 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel
      packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface
      1095 feet; Bedrock 1018 feet; Water Table 1057 feet.
      Sand, fine to med, light brown to brown     4
      Clay, brown to light brown, sandy           1
      Clay, gray to light reddish brown, hard,
            sandy                                 5
      Sand, med, light brown to tan, clayey       5
      Sand, med, light brown to tan               5
      •Sand, med to fine, light brown, to reddish
            brown                                10
      Clay, light brown to reddish brown, silty  27
      Sand, med to very coarse                   20
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red    3
                4
                5

                10
                15
                20

                30
                57
                77
 12bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
       no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
       Land Surface  1097 feet; Bedrock 1014 feet.
       Sand,  fine  to very fine, reddish brown      6
       Clay,  brown to reddish brown, some  light
             gray  sandy  clay                      18
       Sand,  fine, light brown                     9
       Clay,  light brown and gray,  sandy           7
       Clay,  light gray, tough                     3
       Sand,  fine  to very coarse, tan  to reddish
             brown                            '   12
       Sand,  coarse to very coarse, fine gravel,
             clean, brown                         15
       Sand,  coarse, red                         13
       Permian Bedrock,  siltstone,  red brown,
             hard, mottled                         7
                24
                33
                40
                43

                55

                70
                83
                             145
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	       Thickness     Depth""

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

18bccl-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Water analysis available.
      Well cased with 30 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing,  slotted
      and gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1013 feet; Bedrock 985 feet; Water Table 1009
      feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    5           5
      Sand, med to coarse, brown                 10          15
      Sand, med to coarse, gray                  10          25
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel              3          28
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red    2

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

2dbdl-0bservation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.  Well
      cased with 38 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing slotted and
      gravel packed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1023 feet; Bedrock 988 feet; Water Table 1014 feet.

      Sand, med, brown, clayey                    8           8
      Sand, med to coarse, brown                  2          10
      Sand, med to coarse, brown, clayey         20          30
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, gray with
            fine gravels                          5          35
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red,
            mottled

lldbal-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.  Well
      cased with 39 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing slotted and
      gravel packed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1025 feet; Bedrock 987 feet; Water Table 1010 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, light brown             10          10
      Sand, med to coarse, light brown           10          20
      Sand, med to very coarse, fine gravels     18          33
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red    2

lldcdl-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.  Well
      cased with 34 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing slotted and
      gravel packed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1025 feet; Bedrock 994 feet; Water Table 1014 feet.


                            146
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 17 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

lldcdl-cont inued

      Sand, med to coarse, light brown            5           5
      Sand, med to coarse, buff to tan           10          15
      Sand, coarse to med, gray                   5          20
      Sand, coarse, witn fine gravel, gray       11          31
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to bright red   2

12daa1-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.  Well
      cased with  26 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and
      gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1020 feet; Bedrock 995 feet; Water Table 1007 feet.

      Sand, med to fine, brown                    6           6
      Clay, brown, sandy                          6          12
      Sand, med to coarse, brown                 13          25
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red,
            mottled                               5

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE  6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3cbdl-Observation well developed under this  project  for water  level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis  available.   Installed
      36 feet of  4%  inch  PVC  casing, slotted and gravel packed.
      Estimated mean sea  level  elevations:   Land Surface  1170  feet;
      Bedrock 1136  feet;  Water  Table 1156  feet.

      Sand,  fine  to  med,  dark brown              4            4
      Clay,  dark  gray,  sandy                       2            6
      Clay,  light gray,  sandy                    4           10
      Clay,  light gray,  sticky, hard drilling     10           20
      Clay,  light gray,  soft                       5           25
       Clay,  light gray  to red to reddish brown    5           30
       Clay,  gray, silty                            4           34
       Permian Bedrock,  clay,  red  to maroon,  and
             blue  gray,  with a mottled  red to
             brick red shale                      11

 5dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
       no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
       Land Surface  1172 feet; Bedrock 1134 feet.'

       Sand,  fine to med,  brown to reddish brown   6           6
       Clay,  gray to varicolored,  some sand        7          13


                            147
-------
              Table fl-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

5dddl-continued

      Clay, reddish brown with gray streaks,
            sandy                                 7          20
      Clay, reddish brown                         3          23
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown        7          30
      Clay, light gray, hard                      8          38
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to maroon,
            green to white mottling              12

6bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for water level and
      water quality data.  Installed 45 feet of 4^ inch PVC well
      casing, slotted and gravel packed.  Water analysis available.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 1120 feet;
      Bedrock 1075 feet; Water Table 1096 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                           6           6
      Clay, brown, sandy                         14          20
      Sand, fine to med, brown, clayey           10          30
      Sand, fine to med, brown                    6          36
      Clay, brown                                 9          45
      Permian Redbed, silt, red to dark red,
            interbedded with red shale, mottled
            with green to white spots            15

6dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1153 feet; Bedrock 1120 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown to gray            2           2
      Clay, slate gray                            5           7
      Clay, light gray                            2           9
      Sand, fine to med, red to brown             7          16
      Clay, brown to gray,  sandy                  4          20
      Sand, fine to very fine, brown to reddish
            brown                                 6          26
      Clay, light gray brown                      7          33
      Permian Bedrock, clay, reddish brown to
            maroon, mottled                       2

7caa1-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.   Cased
      with 30 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel
      packed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface
      1150 feet; Bedrock 1118 feet; Water Table 1141 feet.
                            148
-------
              Table fl-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

7 ca a1-cont inued

      Sand, med, light brown with thin clay
            lenses                                8           8
      Sand, med, light brown to tan, clean        5          13
      Clay, reddish brown                         7          20
      Clay, light gray, sandy                     5          25
      Clay, light brown                           7          32
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon,
            mottled                               2

 Seed-Test hole drilled under this  project for lithologic purposes,
      no  casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1131 feet; Bedrock 1098 feet.

      Sand, fine  to med,  dark brown to  light
            brown                                 5            5
      Sand, fine,  light brown to red brown,
            with  thin sandy clay lenses
            and fine  gravel                      10           15
      Sand, fine,  light brown to buff,  fine
            gravel                                5           20
      Sand, fine,  silty,  light  brown  to red
            brown                                 3           23
       Clay, reddish brown                        10           33
       Permian Bedrock, clay and shale,  red to
             brick red, gummy, mottled            17

 9cccl-Test hole drilled under  this project for lithologic purposes,
       no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
       Land Surface 1166 feet;  Bedrock 1126 feet.

       Sand, med to fine,  reddish brown to light
             brown                                 4            4
       Sand, fine, light gray,  some clay silty     6          10
       Sand, med,  light brown to tan,  some clay    5          15
       Sand, med to fine,   light brown to red
             brown with some light brown clay     15          30
       Clay, light brown,   tough                   10          40
       Permian Bedrock, clay and shale, red
             brown to dark red, mottled           10

 lObbbl-Test hole drilled  under this project for lithologic purposes,
       no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level  elevations:
       Land Surface 1171  feet; Bedrock  1121 feet.
                            149
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness     Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

lObbbl-continued

      Sand, fine to med, dark brown               3           3
      Clay, gray, sandy                           3           6
      Sand, fine to med, light brown to reddish
            brown                                11          17
      Clay, light gray, sandy                     3          20
      Clay, light gray, some red brown with
            few chunks of sharp gravel           17          37
      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown            5          42
      Clay, brown                                 8          50
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, light gray,
            hard, red to dark red, clay          10

lOdddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1174 feet; Bedrock 1121 feet.

      Sand, med, light brown                      5           5
      Clay, gray, sandy                           1           6
      Sand, fine, light gray to buff, clean       5          11
      Clay, red brown and gray, sandy             6          17
      Sand, fine, red brown with some red brown
            clay                                  4          21
      Clay, brown to light  gray,  caliche          9          30
      Clay, light reddish brown to brown and
            gray, caliche tough                  10          40
      Clay, light buff to light gray, caliche      5          45
      Clay, light brown to  reddish brown          8          53
      Permian Bedrock, clay,  reddish brown to
            maroon,  gummy,  red to maroon, silty
            and shale                            17

10ddd2-0bservation well developed under this project for  water
      level and water quality data.   Water analysis available.
      Installed 57 feet of  4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and
      gravel packed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:   Land
      Surface 1174 feet;  Bedrock 1119 feet;  Water Table 1160 feet.

      Sand, med to fine,  light brown              6           5
      Clay, light gray,  sandy                  .   3           9
      Sand, med,  light gray to buff,  clean        3          12
      Clay, red brown and gray, sandy             8          20
      Clay, reddish  brown,  sandy,  caliche         5          25
                           150
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

lOddd2-continued

      Clay, light brown to butf and reddish brown,
            tougn                                 5          30
      Clay, yellow, tan, brown, and gray, tough  10          40
      Clay, light brown to gray, caliche, gravel
            pebbles                              15          55
      Permian Bedrock, clay, reddish brown,
            gummy, and silty, red shale           6

15cadl-0bservation well developed in this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.  Installed
      80 feet of  4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel
      packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface
      1170  feet;  Bedrock 1089 feet; Water Table 1162 feet.

      Sand, dark  brown                            2           2
      Sand, fine, yellow to brown,  clayey         3           5
      Sand, fine, red brown, with clay layers     5          10
      Clay, reddish brown  to brown, with sandy
            gray  clay                             15          25
      Clay, light gray, hard drilling, caliche    5          30
      Clay, light gray  to  reddish brown,
            caliche                                5          35
      Clay, light red brown, caliche,  sharp
            ' edge, pebbles                          5          40
      Clay, light brown to buff, caliche         20          60
      Clay,  light brown and buff to gray,  sandy,
             caliche                                5          65
       Clay, brown to  lignt red brown,  gummy       5          70
      Sand, fine to very  fine,  tan to light
             brown                                11          81
       Permian Bedrock,  shale,  red  to  dark red,
             hard silty                            1

 16aaal-Test hole drilled  under this project for lithologic purposes,
       no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
       Land Surface 1170 feet;  Bedrock 1090 feet.

       Sand, fine to med,  brown                    3            3
       Clay, dark gray, sandy                      2            5
       Sand, fine, light gray to buff, clayey      5           10
       Clay, gray to red brown                     7           17
       Sand, fine, red to brown                    4          21
       Clay, brown                                 4          25
                            151
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS

                                              Thickness"
Formation Description
Depth
TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

16aaa1-continued
      Clay, red to brown, sandy
      Sand, med to fine, red to brown
      Clay, brown to buff, soft, gummy
      Permian Bedrock, clay, dark brown to
            reddish brown, shaley, mottled
                                            8
                                           34
                                           13
 33
 67
 80
16ccdl-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Water analysis available.  Well
      cased with 64 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing, slotted,  and
      gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land
      Surface 1170 feet; Bedrock 1107 feet; Water Table 1138 feet.
      Sand, fine to med, light brown             10
      Sand, fine, buff to gray, silty             7
      Sand, fine to very fine, light red brown
            with thin layers of clay              3
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown     16
      Clay, reddish brown sandy                  14
      Clay, reddish brown, tough                 13
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to dark red      2
                                                       10
                                                       17

                                                       20
                                                       36
                                                       50
                                                       63
16dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:   '
      Land Surface 1166 feet; Bedrock 1086 feet.
      Sand, fine to med, brown                    4
      Sand, fine to med, brown and gray,  clayey   3
      Sand, fine, buff to gray                    3
      Sand, fine to med, light brown to reddish
            brown                                10
      Sand, fine, light brown, thin layer of
            brown clay                           12
      Clay, light brown, sandy                   11
      Sand, fine, light brown, tan and buff      27
      Clay, brown, sandy                         10
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red brown, sticky;
            and red to brick red, shale          20
                                                        4
                                                        7
                                                       10

                                                       20

                                                       32
                                                       43
                                                       70
                                                       80
17aabl-Observation well developed under this  project for water lev i
      and water quality data.  Water analysis  available.   Estimated
      mean sea level elevations:   Land Surface 1180  feet;  Bedrock
      1125 feet; Water Table 1137 feet.
                           152
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

17aabl- continued

      Sand, fine to med, light brown to light
            red brown                            14          14
      Clay, gray, sandy                           6          20
      Clay, dark gray                             5          25
      Sand, fine, light brown to yellow, silty    7          32
      Sand, med, buff to tan                      3          35
      Sand, fine, buff to tan, silty              5          40
      Clay, light brown to tan to reddish brown  15          55
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon

17bbbl-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      quality data.  Water analysis available.  Installed 36 feet
      of 4^ inch  PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.
      Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Bedrock 1094 feet;
      Land Surface 1130 feet; Water Table 1109 feet.

      Sand, med,  light brown                       5            5
      Clay, light brown to yellow brown, silty     5          10
      Clay, light brown to reddish brown, silty    5          15
      Clay, light brown, red  and yellow, sandy   21          36
      Permian Bedrock,  clay,  red to maroon,
            shaley                                 4

 17dddl-Test hole  drilled  under this  project  for  lithologic  purposes,
      no casing  installed.   Estimated mean  sea  level  elevations:
       Land Surface  1150  feet; Bedrock 1108  feet.

       Sand,  fine  to  med,  brown                    5            5
       Sand,  fine, light brown, some  silt          5           10
       Sand,  med,  light brown to light red brown   5           15
       Sand,  fine to med,  light brown, hard
             drilling,  thin layers  clayey sand     9           24
       Clay,  light brown,  buff, yellow, and gray   6           30
       Clay,  light reddish brown                   5           35
       Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon,
             mottled                               8

 20ccal-Test hole and observation well developed under this project
       for lithologic purposes and water quality data in the Permian
       Bedrock.  Electric log and water analysis available.  Well
       cased 75 feet deep with 7 inch steel pipe and cemented  at
       bottom.  Well completed as open hole from 75 to 140  feet.
       Estimated mean sea level elevations:  Land Surface 110  feet;


                             153
-------
              Table fl-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness     DeptH"
TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

20ccal- continued

      Bedrock 1043 feet; Water Table 1091 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                           5           5
      Sand, fine, reddish brown, some coarse
            gra ins                                5          10
      Sand, fine, reddish brown, silty,
            carbonaceous                         10          20
      Sand, very fine, reddish brown, silty      19          39
      Clay, reddish brown, soft                   1          40
      Sand, very coarse, light brown, some fine
            gravel                               10          50
      Gravel, fine, few coarse pebbles, coarse
            sand, shells (fossil is Ferous)      10          60
      Sand, med to coarse, brown,  tan,  and red    7          67
      Permian Bedrock:
            Shale, silty, red to maroon,  hard     3          70
            Shale, red to maroon,  soft             5          75
            Siltstone, red to maroon, mottled
              gray                                5          80
            Siltstone, red to brick red,  shaley   5          85
            Clay, red to brick r*ed, thin layers
              of siltstone, mottled gray         15         100
            Shale, red to maronn,  mottled gray   10         no
            Shale, red to brick red, soft        10         120
            Shale, red to reddish brown to
              orange brown, soft;  hard  layer
              125^-126                           10         130
            Shale, orange brown, mottled white,
              and greenish gray, soft             5         135
            Shale, orange brown, thin layers
              siltstone                           5         140

21cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic  purposes
      no casing installed.   Estimated mean sea level  elevations:
      Land Surface 1113 feet; Bedrock 1049 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, buff and  tan to  light
            brown                                 2           2
      Clay, yellow, gray, and brown, sandy        5           7
      Sand, fine to med, light brown              3          10
      Clay, brown                                13          23
      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown            13          35
      Clay, reddish brown,  silty                  4          40


                            154
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Format ion Descr ipt ion	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

21cccl-continued

      Sand, fine to very fine, brown              6          46
      Sand, med to coarse, clean, brown           4          50
      Sand, med to very coarse, fine gravel,
            brown                                14          64
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon       6

22aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1177 feet; Bedrock 1120 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    3           3
      Clay, slate gray                            7          10
      Clay, light gray, with  layers of med to
            fine  sand                            ~ 5          15
      Sand, fine to med,  light brown to tan       6          21
      Clay, light  brown,  sandy                   16          37
      Sand, fine,  reddish brown                   8          45
      Clay, brown, gummy                         12          57
      Permian Bedrock,  clay,  red to dark  red
            with  gray mottling and red to dark
            reddish  brown, shale                  8

 22cccl-Test hole  drilled  under this  project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean  sea level elevations:
       Land Surface 1160 feet; Bedrock 1111  feet.

       Sand, fine  to  med,  tan to  buff,  clean      20           20
       Sand, fine to  med,  reddish brown           15           35
       Sand, fine to silty, reddish brown to
             brown                                 6           41
       Clay, brown to reddish brown                8           49
       Permian Bedrock,  clay, red to dark red,
             mottled, and red to dark red, shale  11

 22cddl-Observation well developed under this project for water
       level and water quality data.   Water analysis  available.
       Well cased with 52  feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted
       and gravel packed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
       Land Surface 1170 feet; Bedrock 1123 feet; Water Table
       1127 feet.

       Sand, fine to med,  light brown             25          25
       Clay, red brown, sandy                     15          40


                             155
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

2 2cddl-continued

      Clay, brown                                 7          47
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to maroon,
            mottled                              13

24bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1184 feet; Bedrock 1162 feet.

      Sand, fine, dark brown                      3           3
      Clay, gray                                  2           5
      Sand, fine, buff to reddish brown           5          10
      Sand, fine to med, light brown, clayey      5          15
      Sand, fine to med, light brown              7          22
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red and gray, and
            red to dark red, shale                8

26aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1180 feet; Bedrock 1135 feet.

      Sand, med to very fine, brown to reddish
            brown                                 7           7
      Sand, med to fine, light brown              8          15
      Sand, med to very fine, light brown, some
            clay                                  8          23
      Clay, light reddish brown, sandy            2          25
      Sand, fine to med, light red brown to buff  15          40
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown, silty      3          43
      Clay, brown to light brown, silty           2          45
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to bright red,
            mottled, and red to maroon, mottled,
            silty shale                          15

27cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1122 feet; Bedrock 1085 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, dark brown to red brown   5           5
      Sand, fine to med, tan to light brown      12          17
      Clay, red brown, sandy                     13          30
      Clay, red brown, brown, gray; sandy         7 .         37
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to maroon,
            soft and dark red, mottled,
            siltstone                            13


                            156
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

29cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1100 feet; Bedrock 1041 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, dark brown and reddish
            brown                                 7           7
      Clay, light gray, sandy                     4          11
      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown           19          30
      Sand, fine to coarse, reddish brown, with
            thin layers of brown clay             5          35
      Sand, very coarse, brown, with some fine
            gravel                               15          50
      Sand, med to coarse, red to maroon to
            dark reddish brown                    9          59
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to brick
            red, shaley, and mottled              6

29dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1112 feet; Bedrock 1050 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, light brown             16          16
      Clay, gray to yellow gray, sandy            6          22
      Sand, fine, light brown                    18          40
      Sand, med to fine, light brown              9          49
      Sand, coarse, and fine gravel, buff to
            yellow                               13          62
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon,
            with, thin  siltstone layers, hard,
            mottled                               8

3Ibaa 1-Observation well developed under this  project for water
      level and water  quality data.  Water analysis available.
      Well cased with  54 feet of 4% inch well casing, slotted
      and gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea  level elevations:
      Land Surface 1102 feet; Bedrock'1049 feet; Water Table
      1082 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    5            5
      Sand, very fine,  light brown               10          15
      Sand, med to fine,  light reddish brown      5          20
      Sand, fine, reddish brown with yellow
            gray clay                             6          26
      Clay, light brown,  sandy                    3'          29
      Sand, coarse to  very coarse, brown to
            yellow                               27          53


                            157
-------
              Table fl-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3Iba a 1-cont inued

      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red    3

31bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project fpr lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 100 feet; Bedrock 1054 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    6           6
      Clay, brown to gray, sandy                  2           8
      Sand, fine to med, light reddish brown;
            with thin layers of brown clay
            8-13 feet.                           12          20
      Sand, fine to coarse, light reddish brown   5          25
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel, brown       7          42
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon,
            silty                                 8

31dddl-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Water analysis available.
      Well cased with 34 feet of 4% inch PVC well casing, slotted
      and gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1089 feet; Bedrock 1055 feet; Water Table
      1082 feet.

      Sand, fine, brown                          10          10
      Sand, fine, reddish brown, some silt        5          15
      Clay, gray to reddish brown, sandy          5          20
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown             3          23
      Clay, reddish brown                         1          24
      Sand, fine to coarse, with gravel and thin
            layers of brown clay                 10          34
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to brick red     2

32baa1-Observation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Water analysis available.
      Well cased with 70 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted
      and gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1105 feet; Bedrock 1036 feet; Water Table 1087
      feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    4           4
      Clay, dark gray to light gray, sand         2           6
      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown            5          11


                            158
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	   Thickness      Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3 2ba a1-cont inued

      Clay, gray, gray brown, and tan, sandy      4          15
      Clay, buff to gray and red brown, sandy     5          20
      Clay, reddish brown to buff, some gray     13          33
      Sand, med to coarse, tan, clean             7          40
      Sand, med to very coarse, fine gravel, tan
            to brown, thin layer of reddish
            brown clay 46-47'                    20          60
      Sand, fine to med, red, chunks of red
            clay                                  9          69
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to maroon
            mottled                               1

32cccl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1085 feet; Bedrock 1054 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, brown                    5            5
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown             5          10
      Sand, fine to very- fine, light brown with
            thin  layers gray and brown, sandy
            clay                                 10          20
      Sand, coarse to very coarse, dark brown     5          25
      Sand, med to very coarse, reddish brown     5          30
      Sand, med to coarse, light brown with fine
            gravel                                1          31
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to bright
            reddish brown, silty, mottled         9

34cccl-Test hole  drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing  installed.   Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1100 feet; Bedrock  1043 feet.

      Sand, fine  to med,  light brown               5            5
      Clay, red  brown and  light gray,  sandy        2            7
      Sand, fine  to med, reddish  brown            3           10
       Clay, light gray to  blue gray                7           17
      Sand, fine  to med,  tan                     12           29
       Clay, reddish brown and gray, sandy          6           35
       Sand, med  to  coarse, buff to  brown           5           40
       Sand, med  to very  coarse, brown,  with thin
             layers of gray clay                    5           45
       Sand, med  to  coarse, tan                    5           50
       Sand, very coarse,  light reddish brown      5           55


                            159
-------
              Table A-5 (continued)

      Formation Description
LITHOLOGIC LOGS

        Thickness
Depth
TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

34cccl-continued
      Sand, very coarse, fine gravel, brown       2
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red brown to
            brick red                             8
                       57
3Sbbbl-Observation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Water analysis available.
      Well cased with 61 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted
      and gravel packed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1143 feet; Bedrock 1080 feet; Water Table 1120
      feet.
      Sand, fine to med, brown                    5
      Sand, fine, light gray, clayey, some fine
            gravels                               3
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown            13
      Clay, light reddish brown, sandy            2
      Sand, med to fine, reddish brown           13
      Clay, light brown, red brown, and gray,
            sandy                                27
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to maroon   1
                        8
                       21
                       23
                       36

                       63
35dddl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1118 feet; Bedrock 1075 feet.
      Sand, fine to med, light red brown         10
      Sand, fine, light red brown to buff, silty  5
      Sand, med to fine, light reddish brown      5
      Clay, brown, sandy                          4
      Sand, fine to med, brown to red brown      19
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to maroon
            mottled                               7
                       10
                       15
                       20
                       24
                       43
36bbbl-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1170 feet; Bedrock 1103 feet.
      Sand, fine to med, brown to tan            10
      Sand, fine to very fine, reddish brown      3
      Clay, reddish brown, sandy                  9
      Sand, med to fine, light brown,
            carbonaceous                    .     13
                       10
                       13
                       22

                       35
                            160
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description   	        Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3Gbbbl-continued

      Sand, med, light brown, clean              17          52
      Clay, brown, hard drilling                 15          67
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to brick red,
            soft, some mottling                  13

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

35aaal-Test hole drilled under this project for lithologic purposes,
      no casing installed.  Estimated mean sea level elevations:
      Land Surface 1080 feet; Bedrock 1033 feet.

      Sand, fine to med, dark brown               6           6
      Clay, buff, sandy                           4          10
      Clay, buff and reddish brown, sandy        10          20
      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown            4          24
      Clay, buff to gray, sandy                   1          25
      Sand, very coarse, some gravel reddish
            brown                                15          40
      Sand, and gravel, reddish brown to tan      7          47
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to brick red   13

TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 8 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

10bab-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Well cased with 41 feet of 4% inch
      PVC well  casing, slotted and gravel packed.  Estimated mean
      sea level elevations:   Land Surface.

      Sand, fine, brown                           7           7
      Clay, brown, gray and red, sandy            6          13
      Sand, very  fine to med, reddish brown      22          35
      Sand, coarse, brown                         6          41
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, red to maroon,
            hard                                   1

TOWNSHIP  19 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

 Sdadl-Observation well developed under this project for water  level
      and water quality data.  Well cased with  31  feet of 4^ inch
      PVC well  casing, slotted and gravel packed.

      Sand, fine  brown clayey                     4            4
       Clay, red,  reddish brown, hard;  fine
            gravel                                14           18


                             161
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

8da d1-cont inued

      Clay, choc, brown, fine gravel              9          27
      Sand, fine to coarse, some fine gravel,
            brown                                 3          30
      Permian Bedrock, clay, light gray and
            maroon                                2

22aaa1-Observation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Well cased with 40 feet of
      4% inch PVC well casing.   Estimated mean sea level elevations
      Land Surface 1080 feet; Bedrock 1033 feet.

      Clay, dark brown, sandy                     5           5
      Clay, choc, brown, silty, hard drilling     5          10
      Clay, light choc, brown,  gummy, soft       11          21
      Sand, coarse, dark brown, fossil shells     4          25
      Clay, brown, hard                          12          37
      Sand, med to coarse, light brown            4          41
      Permian Bedrock, clay, red to maroon,
            hard, shaley                          6

TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 8 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

17ccd-0bservation well developed under this project for lithologic
      purposes, and for water level and water quality data.   Well
      cased with 73 feet of 4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and
      gravel packed.

      Sand, fine to med, light brown to tan and
            reddish brown                        20          20
      Sand, fine to med, reddish brown some
            coarse sand and pebbles of fine
            gravel                                5          25
      Sand, fine, light brown,  brown clay         8          33
      Clay, light yellow to brown, sandy          5          38
      Sand, fine light brown, clayey              2          40
      Clay, light gray, brown,  yellow and red
            brown                                18          58
      Sand, fine to very coarse, tan to light
            brown                                 7          65
      Gravel, fine, tan to light brown            7          72
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, hard, red,
            maroon and gray                       2
                            162
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 19 NORTH, RANGE 9 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

lOcddl-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Well cased with 32 feet of 4^ inch
      PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.

      Sand, fine to med, brown to tan            16          16
      Clay, gray, thin layers of fine gravel      4          20
      Sand, fine to med, light gray, clayey       4          24
      Sand, fine to coarse, light brown, fine
            gravel                                7          31
      Permian Bedrock, siltstone, maroon,
            hard                                  1

TOWNSHIP 20 NORTH, RANGE 10 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

Ibbbl-Observation well developed under this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Well cased with 71 feet of 1\  inch
      PVC well casing.

      Sand, fine to med, brown to light brown     7           7
      Clay, gray, sandy                           5           12
      Sand, med to fine, gray, brown and  light
            brown                                15           27
      Clay, red, yellow, brown, gray,  layers of
            silt and  fine  sand                    9           36
      Sand, coarse to very coarse,  light  brown
            with  fine to med  gravel             24           60
      Sand, coarse to ned, brown to tan           4           64
      Sand, coarse to very coarse,  with  fine to
            med gravel                            6           70
      Permian Bedrock,  siltstone, dark red  to
            maroon, hard                          1

TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE  9 WEST  INDIAN MERIDIAN

 6cccl-Test  hole  drilled under this  project  for lithologic purposes,
      well was  converted  to observation well for water  level and
      water quality data.   Well  cased with  135 feet of  4^ inch PVC
      well casing, slotted and gravel packed.

       Clay, brown, sandy                           5           5
       Sand, fine,  brown                           5          10
       Sand, fine to very  fine, reddish brown     16          26
       Permian Bedrock:
            Sand,  very fine, clay reddish brown,
               orange  brown                        4          30
                             163
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITUOLOGIC LOGS

      Formation Description                   Thickness     Depth"

TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 9 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

6cccl-cont inued

            Clay, brown to orange brown, hard    10          40
            Clay, brown to orange brown and
              maroon, greenish white fragments   10          50
            Clay, red, red brown to maroon, soft,
              gummy                              10          60
            Clay, orange brown to red brown,
              maroon, greenish white flakes      20          80
            Clay, reddish brown to maroon, hard,
              siltstone layers                   10          90
            Siltstone, reddish brown, orange
              brown, and maroon, thin soft
              layers clay, lost circulation at
              135 feet                           50         140

TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 10 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

3Ibabl-Observation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.   Well cased with 51 feet of
      4^ inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.

      Sand, fine to med light red brown          20          20
      Sand, fine to med, light brown, clayey     11          31
      Sand, fine to med, light brown              5          35
      Clay, light brown, sandy                    3          39
      Sand, med to coarse, light brown            3          42
      Clay, light brown, yellow and light gray,
            sandy                                 3          45
      Sand, very coarse, tan to brown             5          50
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon,
            hard                                  1

TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

23daal-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.   Well cased with 68 feet of
      4% inch PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.

      Sand, fine to med, light brown, orange
            brown, and red brown                 25          25
      Clay, light brown, yellow brown, sandy      5          30
      Sand, fine to med light yellow to orange
            brown                                10          40
      Sand, fine to very fine, light brown        6          46
                            164
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).   LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

23daa1-continued

      Clay, light brown, silty and soft           4          50
      Clay, light brown, yellow and red brown,
            caliche                              10          60
      Gravel, fine to med, angular to subangular,
            with very coarse sand                 5          65
      Sand, very coarse with fine to med gravel   2          67
      Permian Bedrock, shale, red to maroon       1

TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

19daal-0bservation well developed under this project for water
      level and water quality data.  Well cased with 52 feet of
      4^ inch PVC well casing.

      Sand, med, brown, fine gravel               6           6
      Clay, choc, brown, sandy, some fine gravel  8          14
      Sand, med to coarse, tan to light brown     6          20
      Sand, fine  to coarse, with fine gravel,
            light reddish brown                   12          32
      Sand, fine  to silty, light brown, some
            clay, brown                           3          35
      Sand, med to coarse, tan to light brown     5          40
      Sand, coarse to very coarse with  fine
            gravel, light brown                   12          52
      Permian Bedrock,  shale, red to maroon       3

TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, .RANGE  12 WEST  INDIAN MERIDIAN

 29bbbl-Observation well developed under this  project for water
       level and water quality data.  Well cased with 30 feet of
       4^ inch  PVC well  casing,  slotted and gravel packed.

       Sand,  fine, brown to light  brown           15           15
       Sand,  very  fine,  light brown                5           20
       Sand,  fine  to  very  fine,  reddish brown      8           28
       Permian  Bedrock,  siltstone,  red  to  maroon,
             greenish white spots,  hard            2

 TOWNSHIP 24  NORTH,  RANGE  14 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

 26cccl-0bservation well developed under this project for water
       level and water quality data.  Well cased with 60 feet of
       4^ inch PVC well casing,  slotted and gravel packed.

                             165
-------
              Table A-5 (continued).  LITHOLOGIC LOGS
	Formation Description	Thickness	Depth

TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

26cccl-cont inued

      Sand, fine to med, brown, light brown      10          10
      Sand, fine, light reddish brown, carbon
            flakes                                6          16
      Clay, light brown, gray, yellow, sandy,
            hard                                  7          23
      Sand, med to fine, light brown, carbon
            particles                            12          35
      Sand, fine to very fine, tan to light
            brown                                17          52
      Permian Bedrock, clay, brown, reddish
            brown, maroon, with light greenish
            gray spots                            8

TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST INDIAN MERIDIAN

29ccal-0bservation well developed for this project for water level
      and water quality data.  Well cased with 51 feet of 4^ inch
      PVC well casing, slotted and gravel packed.

      Sand, fine, brown                           6           6
      Clay, light gray                            3           9
      Sand, very coarse, light red brown with
            fine gravel                          11          20
      Permian Bedrock, clay, brown, red and
            maroon, with greenish white spots     3
                                166
-------
                            TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                      (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 REPORT NO.

 RPA-fifiQ/3-74-033
                       2.
                                                 RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 TITLE AND SUBTITLE

SALT WATER DETECTION IN THE CIMARRON TERRACE,
OKLAHOMA
 REPORT DATE
 April  1975
 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 AUTHOR(S)
                                                8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

Oklahoma Water  Resources Board
2241 N. W.  40th Street
Oklahoma City,  Oklahoma 73112
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

1BA024
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                Grant No.  S-800994
2 SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U. S. Environmental  Protection Agency
tobt. S. Kerr  Environmental Research Laboratory
National Environmental Research Center
?. 0. Box  1198,  Ada, Oklahoma 74820
                                                13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
   Final
 . SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
^SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 ABSTRACT
     The objectives of this project were to demonstrate the appli-
cability of  surface resistivity techniques to  delineate salt water
contamination in a shallow alluvial aquifer, to outline areas of salt
water  contamination in a valuable terrace aquifer,  to permit safe
future development, and to identify the sources of  such contamination.

     Surface resistivity using thewenner spread and both Barnes layer
and apparent resistivity interpretive methods  was found useful in
outlining  areas of major water quality changes where the geologic
environment  was simple and the terrace composed of  sand.  However, where
clay was present xi the terrace or where the bedrock relief was large,
surface resistivity was not found to be an accurate definitive tool.

     Two large areas of salt water contamination were intensively
studied by test drilling.  In one of these areas resistivity was
extensively  used.  Brine contamination of one  of these areas was
attributed to oil field brine evaporation pits while the other area
was contaminated by natural brines from the underlying bedrock.  The
sodium/chloride ratio was used to identify the source of brines.
17 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS |
~ DESCRIPTORS
Ground Water
Electrical Resistivity
Saline Water
igTBlSTRIBUTION STATEMENT
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Oil Field Brines
Natural Brines
Wenner Spread
Barnes Layer
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)1
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
. cos ATI Field/Group 1
13/02 1
21. NO. OF PAGES
175
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (••73) * U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1975-698-227/116 REGION 10
-------