PB 202 167
TRANSPORTATION COSTS OF FOSSIL FUELS
Bureau of Mines
Washington, D.C.
June 1971
NATIONAL 'ECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE
Distributed ...'to foster, serve
and promote the nation's
economic development
and technological
advancement.'
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
This document has been approved for public release and sale.
-------
TRANSPORTATION COSTS
OF FOSSIL FUELS
INTERIM REPORT
JUNE 1971
Conducted in cooperation with the Office of Air Programs of Environ-
mental Protection Agency by the Bureau of Mines under a Working
Fund Agreement.
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF MINES
MINERAL SUPPLY ,'
-------
Page
1«*. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail to oven-coke
destinations 20
15. Negotiated tanker rates from U.S. Gulf to U.S. Atlantic
Coast, 1970, by size of tankers carrying residual fuel
oil for single voyages, average 1,800 miles 32
16. Negotiated tanker rates from the Caribbeans to U.S.
Atlantic Coast, 1970, by size of tankers carrying resi-
dual fuel oil for single voyages, average 1,800 miles.. 33
17. Negotiated tanker rates from the Mediterranean to U.S.
Atlantic Coast, 1970, by size of tankers carrying resi-
dual fuel oil for single voyages, average 5,200 miles.. 3^
18. Negotiated tanker rates from Persian Gulf to U.S.
Atlantic Coast, 1970, by size of tankers carrying
residual fuel oil for single voyages, average 12,000
miles via Cape of Good Hope 35
19. Residual fuel oil barge freight rates per long ton from
San Francisco to inland destinations, 1970, for single
voyages of the 1,300-3,200 long ton class size 36
20. Natural gas pipeline systems to the New York and San
Francisco SMSA's, 1970. Ul
TABLES
1. Summary of Btu values and railroad transport costs for
coal in selected coal producing districts 22
2. Residual fuel oil tanker freight rates per long ton,
from specific origins to New York City, 1970 25
3. Residual fuel oil tanker freight rates per long ton,
from specific origins to San Francisco, 1970 27
1*. Residual fuel oil barge freight rates per long ton,
from San Francisco to inland destinations, 1970, for
single voyages of the 1,300-3,200 long ton class 28
5. Natural gas pipeline transmission rates to New York and
San Francisco ;SMSA' s Uo
A-l. Bituminous coal''received at oven-coke plants in the
United States, 1969 **9
A-2. Transportation cost characteristics of bituminous coal
shipped to selected consumers 56
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Abstract 1
Introduction 2
Transportation of coal 2
Methodology 3
Analysis of data 1+
Summary 23
Transportation of residual fuel oil. 2U
Methodology 29
Analysis of data 30
Summary 38
Transmission of natural gas 39
Analysis of data , Ii2
Summary. liU
Recommendations 1+5
References ........... U6
Coal Appendix 1|8
ILLUSTRATIONS
Fig.
1. Cost per ton mile fon coal shipped by rail from 18 coal
producing districts by length of haul 5
2. Coal producing districts in the United States 6
3. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 1 by length of haul 8
U. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins it Coal District 2 by length of haul 9
5. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 3 by length of haul id
6. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District U by length of haul n
7- Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 7 by length of haul 12
8. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 8 by length of haul 13
9. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 10 by length of haul ill
10. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 11 by length of haul 15
11. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail for minimum
annual tonnage contracts 16
12. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail by minimum
trainload tonnages 18
13. Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail by car
ownership 19
-------
ABSTRACT
This interim report delineates some of the important factors re-
lating to the costs of transporting fossil fuels from regions of
production to sites of consumption. The costs of shipping coal have
been presented in a quantified fashion for selected producing area
to areas of consumption. The costs of shipping residual fuel oil
and natural gas from domestic and foreign sources to New York and San
Francisco Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas also are provided.
Transportation data were collected from published tariffs, trans-
portation associations, and personal communication with railroad,
electric utility, oil, gas, and coal company representatives. The
data were stratified to determine the general effects stratification
had upon transportation costs. Diagrams showing the various levels
of stratification for the fossil fuels and the basic data from which
the diagrams were derived are included.
Economies of haul for coal do exist for longer versus shorter
distances, larger trainload versus smaller trainload sizes, and
company-owned car ownership versus railroad car ownership. Most of
the rates for the longer voyages for the tanker and barge transpor-
tation of residual oil also show economies of haul. No apparent
economies of haul exist relative to volume and/or distance shipped
for natural gas based on the data studied.
-------
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to present a schedule of transpor-
tation costs for coal, residual fuel oil, and natural, gas and to
analyze the costs to reflect their significance. The costs analyses
of coal transportation attempts to show the comparative costs of
transportation between coal districts and points of consumption on a
per ton mile basis. The transportation factors and comparative costs
of moving natural gas and residual fuel oil are analyzed on a long ton
mile and heat value basis. For purposes of convenience throughout
the report, residual fuel oil will be referred to as oil and natural
gas as gas.
The work was completed for and funded by the Office of Air
Programs of the Environmental Protection Agency.
TRANSPORTATION OF COAL
This section provides an analysis of coal transportation data
from points of production to points of consumption. The costs of
transporting coal have been compiled, stratified, and regressed so
that a meaningful analysis could be made of the data.
-------
Methodology
Data were compiled that reflected the cost differences resulting
from transporting coal from various origin points to consumption sites.
Data were collected from Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) tariffs,
tables published by railroad associations, and telephone conversations
with representatives of railroad and electric utility companies
(tables A-l and A-2). Table A-l shows transportation characteristics
of bituminous coal received at oven-coke plants in the United States.
Data pertaining to origin and destination of coal consumed by oven-
coke plants are accompanied by the characteristics of the resulting
transportation charges. Table A-2 shows data for the movement of
bituminous coal by railroad only to electric utility and cement
manufacturing consumers. Origin and destination data of bituminous
coal are accompanied by transportation rate data based on various
conditions of haul.
Regression analyses were performed on a cost per ton mile versus
distance basis. The data were stratified by coal district, size of
trainloads, car ownership, and annual minimum tonnages in an attempt
to reduce the variations of data points about the regression line.
These variations are caused by different transportation parameters
affecting each point in the scatter diagram. The problem of variation
reduction has been a perplexing block to the meaningful analysis of
the transportation data available for this study. Further stratifi-
cation that what is shown by the 13 diagrams was desirable but not
-------
possible because of the lack of data. The trade-off between variation
reduction and the number of points remaining that represent a specific
universe was too great; that is, the number of data points remaining
were too small to make an adequate evaluation of the universe.
Several functions are presented on each graph so that the func-
tion which best fits the data points can be compared with other func-
tions. The intercept, slope, and coefficient of correlation are pre-
sented with each function. The coefficient of correlation (r) shown
for each function reflects the relative fit of the function in relation
to the data points.
Caution should be taken when interpreting the coal diagrams.
The regression equations and corresponding regression lines are pre-
sented only as indicators of possible tendencies within certain areas.
Because a great deal of variation exists in most of the diagrams, the
discrepancy between any actual rate within a particular coal district
and the estimated rate may be large.
Analysis of Data
On most graphs three functions are fit to the data to see which
best minimizes the variance about the regression line. Figure 1 is
data plotted for 18 of the 23 coal-producing districts for which data
was available. Figure 2 shows the 23 coal producing districts in the
United States. The best fitting function is Y = aX with an r of
approximately 0.68. What seems to be reflected in the slope of the
-------
r—0.68639
0- 10.25444
b—0.34531
o
r«-O.63445
a- 1.72274
-O.OOI2l
Yc-o+bx
r—O.6O
a- 1.79323
b--l.51712
100
200
3OO
400
500 6OO 7OO
DISTANCE, miles
800
900
I.OOO 1.100 UOO
FIGURE 1. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from
18 coaj. producing districts by length of haul.
-------
I - Eastern Pennsylvanio
2 - W«»ltrn Pennsylvania
3 - Northern W«tt Virginia
4 - Ohio
5 - Michigan
6 - Panhandle
7 - Soulhtrn No. I
22 - Montana
LEGEND
DISTRICTS*
6- Southern No. 2
9 - West Kentucky
10 - Illinois
11 - Indiana
12 - lowo
13 - Southeastern
14 - Arkonsas-Oaklahomo
15- Southwestern
16- Northern Colorado
17- Southern Colorado
18 - New Mettco
19- Wyoming
20- Utah
21 North-South Dakota
defined in the Bituminous Coal Act of 1937
23- Washington
FIGURE 2. - Coal producing districts in the United States.
-------
regression line, is significant economies of haul, especially within
the 0-500 mile range. Although economies cf haul do exist "beyond the
500 mile range, they are significantly smaller than those economies
realized under 500 miles. An r of 0.68 could be Judged good, when con-
sidering the heterogeneity of the arrayed data.
Figures 3 through 10 are data subsets of figure 1, stratified by
coal producing district. In most instances, the best fit function for
the individual coal district has a higher r than does the best fit
function for figure 1. This would generally be expected since varia-
tion in data dispersion is usually reduced when more variables are
held constant. In several instances the best fit regression line is
linear because no data points were observed within the 0-100 mile range.
However, the best fit regression equations in Districts 7 and 8 (figures
7 and 8) have a lower r value than the r for the 18 districts (figure l).
The lower r value for Districts 7 and 8 may be explained in several
ways: the small number of observations in District f, topography and
location of coal markets, and train size and length of haul are a.11
factors which may increase the variation.
Figure 11 shows data points stratified by minimum annual tonnages
of coal shipped. The diagram shows on the average smaller costs per
ton mile for larger versus smaller minimum annual tonnage contracts.
The greatest economies of haul are again realized for all categories
when the length of haul increases up to approximately the UOO-500 mile
distance.
-------
2.5
2.0
UJ
1.5
ffi
a.
z l.O
LJ
O
0.5-
•\ >
,/*
Yc=oet»
r=-0.45052
0 = 2.34531
b =-0.00170
r=-0.46701
0 = 36.68294
b=-0.576O4
8
Yc=a+bx
r =-0.75627
0=2.26242
b=-2.53821
100
200
FIGURE 3. -
300 400 500 600
DISTANCE, miles
700
800
900
1,000
Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 1 by length of haul.
-------
2.0
1
1.5
cr
UJ
a.
1.0
12
o
0.5
r = -0.4720
0=10.6236
b = -0.755 1
N=49
Yc=oe»«
r =-0.45221
0= 2.052
b=-0.00149
r =-0.89415
0 = 1.74183
b = -l.44239
I
I
I
I
100 200 300 4OO 500 600 700
DISTANCE, miles
800
900 1,000 1,100 I.2OO
FIGURE U. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 2 by length of haul.
vo
-------
2.5
N=40
2.O
UJ
I 1.5
cc
UJ
Ul:
O
r=-0.76774
0=23.527
b=-0.5!306
Yc=oebJf
r=-0.75583
0=1.47339
b=-0.00084
0.5
r =-0.75742
0=1.33760
b =-0.72899
I
1
100 200 300 400 500 600
DISTANCE, miles
TOO
800
900 I.OOO
FIGURE 5. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 3 "by length of haul.
-------
3.0
2ei
•«/
2.0
UJ
P
CT 1.5
UJ
0.
i
8.
1.0
0.5
= 4I
r =-0.80670
0=24.02178
b =-0.53514
r=-0.82805
0=3.46788
b=-O.OO372
r =-080256
0=3.21652
b=-6.60869
100 200 300 400 500 600
DISTANCE, mites
700
800
900
1,000
FIGURE 6. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District U by length of haul.
-------
2.51
2.01
d
2
I
cc
UJ
a.
UJ
1.5
1.01
0.51
1
N=I5
Yc=ox«>
r =-0.2591
0 = 3.4421
b =-0.2015
Yc=oeb*
r =-0.2128
0=1.2614
b=-O.OOO5
r =-0.3058
a=l.3443
b=-0.6448
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
DISTANCE, miles
800
900
1,000 1,100
FIGURE 7. -
Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 7 by length of haul.
-------
3.0
2.5
: 2.0
CK
U)
o.
1.5
ui
u
. 1.0
0.5
= 39
r =-0.5290
o= 12.3050
b= -0.4270
= -O.4948
a= 1.6800
b=-0.0014
8
Yc=a-fbx
r =-0.5315
a= 1.6567
b= -1.5742
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
DISTANCE, miles
800
900
1,000 1,100 1,200
FIGURE 8. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 8 by length of haul.
-------
r = -O.64377
0=1.52444
b =-2.00081
Yc=oxt>
r =-0.79841
o 0 = 13.50321
= -0.50515
Yc=oet>»
r =-0.6899
0=1.48140
b=-O.OOI87
100
200
300
400
500 600 700
DISTANCE, miles
800
900
1,000 1,100 1,200
FIGURE 9. - Cost per ton r^e for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 10 by length of haul.
-------
3.0
2.5
2.0
ui
I
oel 1.5
ual
a.'
1.0
0.5
r=-O.73!5
= 2.6736
b =-5.7826
Yc=axb
= -O.7606
= 9.7459
b=-O.3939
r=-0.8795
a=2.8376
b=-0.0040
100 2OO 300 400 500 600 700
DISTANCE, miles
800
900
1,000
1,100 1,200
FIGURE 10. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail from various
origins in Coal District 11 by length of haul.
-------
3.0
2.5-
r—O.8522
a- 20. 1 338
b— 0.5268
2.0
yi
I
o:
UJ
o.
1.5
r— O.855I
a- 1 3.4333
b— O.4445
N-27
— oYc-axb
r— O.8I8O
a- 7.8737
b— O.3966
N«70
<500,000 torn
- 5OO.OOO tons-l,OOO.OOO tons
-> I, OOO.OOO tons
UJ
O
, 1.0
.5
D
A
I
I
100
200
300 400
50O 60O 70O
DISTANCE, miles
800 9OO 1,000 1.100 1.200
FIGURE 11. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail for minimum
tonnage contracts.
-------
IT
Figure 12 shows cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail by
minimum trainload tonnages. The graph does not exhibit the expected
economies of haul for trainload sizes. The middle class, on the aver-
age, shows the highest average costs of haul of the three sizes. This
again may be attributable to too few data points. However, whatever
the cause may be, without significant additional investigation it is
only a matter of speculation.
Figure 13 shows that the shipper who owns his own cars pays less
than when shipping by railroad-owned cars. The average distance be-
tween the regression lines is approximately 0.25 to 0.30 cents per ton
mile. A greater savings is realized on the average than in figure 12
when coal is shipped by the largest rather than the smallest trainload
size.
Figure lU shows cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail to
oven-coke plants and exhibits approximately the same data dispersion
pattern as that shown in figure 1. The regression lines on figure ik
are higher positioned (cost more per ton mile to ship) than those of
figure 1, due to higher overall transportation rates for coking coal.
-------
r—O.7725
a-IO.I347
b—Q4OO6
N-52
- 5.OOO tons-9.OOO tons
IOO
2OO
300
4OO
5OO 6OO TOO
DISTANCE, miles
8OO
9OO
I.OOO I.IOO 1.200
FIGURE 12. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail by minimum trainload tonnages.
-------
3.0
2.5
o
o
2.0-.
!,
KEY
Ye-ax"
r— 0.79197
a- 11.56169
b— O.4O636
N-170
r— O.7755O
a- a963O3
b— O.42O38
N-51
-Rdirood owned cars
-Company or snipper owned cars
UJ
O
1.0
.5
I
I
100
200
300 4OO 500 60O 700 600 900
QSTANCE. miles
FIGURE 13. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail by car ownership.
1.000 1.100
-------
r—O.7802
a- 16.925
b—0.4352
o
o
r—O.5423
0" 1.992O
b—O.OI28
r--O.6292
a- 1-8936
b—O.OO08
5OO 6OO 700
DISTANCE, mites
I.OOO I.IOO UOO
FIGURE ll*. - Cost per ton mile for coal shipped by rail to oven-coke destinations.
-------
21
Table 1 shows a relative comparison of the average calculated
:ost of shipping coal on a Btu basis for a common distance from differ-
ent coal-producing districts. If the calculated value presented vere
the observed value for any distance, real costs of energy input could
be determined for the coal districts presented. Although it is un-
likely that calculated and observed values coincide, comparisons still
can be made to determine the cheapest source of energy inputs from
different geographic areas.
-------
TABLE 1. - Summary of Btu values and railroad transport costs
for coal in selected coal producing districts
Average Btu's
Coal per ton of coal I/
district (in thousands)
1
2
3
1*
7
8
10
11
27,22U
26.672
26,992
21*, 1*68
28,080
27,326
22,800
22,980
Costs to transport coal selected distances
by railroad 2/
(in cents per ton mile)
200
1.80
1.1*5
3/1.59
1.65
1.22
1.30
0.9U
1.25
uoo
'l.2l*
1.33
1.12
0.80
1.10
1.05
0.68
0.57
600
0.80
0.82
0.87
0.39
0.95
0.70
0.55
3/0.21*
800
3/0. U?
0.60
0.77
3/0.15
0.69
0.39
O.U8
3/0.13
I/ Btu's on an as-received basis.
2/ Costs were extrapolated from best-fit regression equations for data
available.
3/ Outside of the range of reported data.
-------
23
Summary
Some major facts concerning transportation costs in the movement
of coal from production area to point of consumption are revealed by
this analysis. Significant economies of haul do exist for (l) longer
versus shorter distances; (2) larger trainload sizes versus smaller
trainload sizes; (3) company car ownership versus railroad car owner-
ship. In addition to economies of haul, some comparisons can be made
concerning the real costs of shipping energy from one coal producing
area to all coal markets. Comparisons of the various figures with one
another will serve this purpose.
A need for additional data is necessary to further delineate
(l) the approximate costs of shipping coal from all coal producing
districts in the U.S.; (2) the effect of annual coal tonnage contracts
on costs; (3) the additional cost savings for unit trains and owner-
ship of cars; and (U) the theoretical economies of haul for coal
shipped from western coal producing areas to eastern coal markets.
-------
TRANSPORTATION OF RESIDUAL FUEL OIL
Oil tanker and barge freight rates, cents per long ton mile,
cents per million Btu, and nautical miles from the U.S. Gulf, Caribbean,
Mexico, Mediterranean-North Africa, Europe, Persian Gulf, and Indonesia
to Nev York-Long Island harbors and San Francisco, and from the San
Francisco Bay area to inland ports on the San Joaquin and Sacramento
Rivers are shown in tables 2-k. The rates shown in these tables per-
tain to the transportation of residual fuel oil and for crude oil
hauled in dirty tankers. The lighter products are transported in
clean tankers.
Foreign flag tankers carry almost all imported oil because
operating costs for U.S. flag tankers are too high to be competitive.
U.S. flag tanker activities is mainly confined to U.S. coastal move-
ments of oil. Foreign flag tankers do not operate in this area (lU).-'
According to the Jones Act (£) merchandise may not be transported by
foreign vessels, or American vessels not entitled to engage In coastwise
trade, except by authorization, if and when in the interest of national
defense.
Little oil moves from the U.S. Gulf to the West Coast and most of
the fuel oil shipped up and down the West Coast is in oil company
tankers (12).
I/ Underlined numbers in parentheses refer to items in the list of
references at the end of this report.
-------
25
TABLE 2. - Residual fuel oil tanker freight rates, per long ton, from
specified origins
Origin
U.S. Gulf
Port Isabel or Brownsville, Tex.
Corpus Christi, Tex.
Texas City, Freeport or Baytown, Tex.
Port Arthur, Tex.
Lake Charles or Beaumont, Tex.
New Orleans or Norco, La.
Ostrica or Pilot Town, La.
Baton Rouge, La.
Bnpire, La.
Mobile, Ala.
Baytown, Tex., and Baton Rouge, La.
Bfiytown and Freeport, Tex.
Btiytown, Tex., and Lake Charles, La.
Corpus Christi and Port Arthur, Tex.
Mobile, Ala., and Ostrica, La.
Port Arthur, Tex., and Baton Rouge, La.
Caribbean
Arroyo, Puerto Rico
Guayanilla, Puerto Rico
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Trinidad
St. Croix, Virgin Islands
Aruba, Netherlands West Indies
Curacao, Netherlands West Indies
Caripito, Venezuela
Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela
Puerto Las Minas, Venezuela
Punta Car don, Venezuela
Cristobol, Panama
Kingston, Jamaica
St. Johns, Antigua
Covenas, Colombia
Manorial, Colombia
Puerto Mexico, Mexico
Tampico, Mexico
to New York City,
Average
miles
1,952
1,861*
1,888
1,837
1,81*2
1,707
1,700
1,81*0
1,700
1,635
1,888
1,888
1,888
1,961*
1,635
1,837
1,1*25
1,399
1,275
1,932
1,300
1,763
1,770
2,016
1,909
2,010
1,812
1,911
1,270
1,271*
1,902
1,81*6
1,907
1,999
1?70
Voyage
dollars Cents per
per long ton
long ton mile
$6.50
6.50
6.30
6.15
6.15
5.75
5.60
6.10
5.60
5.60
7.25
6.85
6.85
7.05
6.20
7.15
5.39
5.39
5.29
6.1*0
5.1*8
5.88
5.88
6.52
6.36
6.1*3
6.03
6.1*0
5.26
5.32
, 6.61
6.1*3
6.1*0
6.73
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.31*
0.33
0.33
' 0.33
0.31*
0.38
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.38
0.39
0.38
0.38
0.1*1
0.33
0.1*2
0.33
0.33
0.32
0.35
0.32
0.33
0.33
0.1*1
0.1*2
0.35
0.35
0.3l*
0.3U
Cents per
million
Btu
13.60
13.60
13.20
12.85;
12.85
12.00
11.70
12.75
11.70
11.70
15.15
lU.30
ll*.30
ll».75
13.00
15.00
11.30
11.30
11.10
13. UO
11.50
12.30
12.30
13.60
13.30
13.50
12.60
13.1*0
11.00
11.10
13.80
13.50
13.1*0
11*. 10
-------
26
TABLE 2. - Residual fuel oil tanker freight rates per long ton, from
specified origins to New York City
Origin
Mediterranean/Africa
Algiers, Algeria
Arzev, Algeria
Port Augusta, Silicy
Bonny, Nigeria
Cagliari, Sardinia
Raslanuf , Libya
Gela, Italy
Genoa, Italy
Huelva, Spain
Naples, Italy
Port Gentil, Gabon
Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Porto Torres, Italy
Sidon, Lebanon
Teneriffe, Canary Islands
Uskudar, Turkey
Europe
Antwerp, Belgium
Bordeaux, France
Donges, P. ranee
Ghent, Belgium
Humber River, United Kingdoa
Isle of Grain, United Kingdom
LaVera, France
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Southampton, United Kingdom
Persian Gulf
Rasat Tannura, Saudi Arabia
Kuwait, Kuwait
Average
miles
3,618
3.U63
5,221*
6,51*9
3,930
5,2UO
1»,100
1*,053
3,135
U.185
5,100
5, in
1*,000
5,202
2,926
U.BU7
3,523
3,2Ul
3,500
3,136
3,075
3,075
3,502
3,532
3,1*25
10,728
12,000
, 1970— continued
Voyage
dollars
per
long ton
$7.80
7-70
8.91
10.58
7.82
9.60
8.75
8.63
7.08
8.82
10.7!*
10.70
8.38
10.23
6.6k
9.79
7.82
8.19
7.61
7-75
7.75
7.75
8.51
7.59
7.33
21.51
2k. 26
Cents per
long ton
miles
.0.22
0.22
0.17
0.16
0.20
0.18
0.21
0.21
0.23
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.20
0.23
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.22
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.2U
0.21
0.21
0.20
0.20
Cents per
million
Btu
/'L6.32
16.10
18.60
22.15
16. 1*0
20.10
18.30
18.00
11*. 80
18.50
22.50
22.1*0
21.00
21.1*0
13.90
20.50
16.30
17.10
15.90
16.20
16.20
16.20
17-80
15.90
15.30
1*5.00
50.80
-------
TABLE 3. - Residual fuel oil tanker freight rates per lone ton.
Origin
Caribbean
Aruba, Netherlands West Indies
Caripito, Venezuela
Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela
Puerto Las Minas, Venezuela
Punt a Car don, Venezuela
Covenas, Colombia
Mamonal, Colombia
Curacao, Netherlands West Indies
Guayanilla, Puerto Rico
Guayaquil, Ecuador
Tampico, Mexico
Trinidad Isle
Europe
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Indonesia
Palembang, Sumatra
Singapore, Malaya
from s oeci fled oriel
Average
Miles
3,922
4,470
4,362
3,890
3,920
3,554
3,562
3,981
4,282
4,083
4,763
4,430
8,091
8,833
8,500
ns to San
Voyage
dollars
per
long tqn
$ 9.58
10.80
10.38
8.45
9.61
9.19
9.16
9.66
10.38
8.74
11.56
10.72
19.05
16.77
16.19
Francesco 1970
Panama
Canal
dollars
$0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
--,-
---
Total
dollars
$10.49
11.71
11.29
9.36
10.52
9.19
9.16
10.57
11.29
9.65
12.47
11.63
19.96
16. 77
16.19
Cents
per long
inQfl mil?
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.26
0.24
0.24
0.21
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.19
0.19
Cents per
million
Btu
20.00
22.60
21.70
17.70
20.10
19.20
19.15
20.20
21.70
18.30
26.10
24.30
41.80
35.10
33.90
-------
TABLE 1*. - Residual fuel oil barge freight rates per long ton.
from San Francisco to inland destinations, 1970 for
single voyages of the 1,
Orlsln Destination
San Francisco Bay Area Emeryville
Alameda
Oakland
Richmond
Oleum
Mare Island
Vallejo
Petaluma
Redwood City
Port Costa
Martinez
Avon .
Pittsburg
Antioch
Rio Vista
Stockton
Sacramento
300-3,
Miles
10
12
15
20
34
34
34
35
35
38
40
42
53
59
65
86
92
200 long
ton class
Cents
Voyage per long
dollars t«n nil?
$0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.87
1.03
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.87
0.87
1.33
1.18
1.33
7.6
6.3
5.1
3.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.9
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.5
2.0
1.4
1.4
Cents per
million
Bt,u
0.16
0.13
0.11
0.08
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
-------
29
Oil imported to New York harbors in 1970 was estimated to be 31
million long tons (236 million barrels), an additional estimated 12
million barrels of oil was delivered from the U.S. Gulf. For the
same period 5.5 million barrels were imported to the U.S. West
Coast (£), of which 1.6 million barrels were barged to San Francisco
Bay and inland ports (U_).
Methodology
Oil tanker transportation rates are percentage variations
negotiated from a flat rate applicable to the particular voyage for
which the vessel is fixed. The percentage variation is referred to
as a fixture (16). The rates used as a basis to construct the attached
oil graphs were obtained by multiplying the fixture of each voyage made
in 1970 by the average flat rate from the ports of each country and
then summing the two.
Subsequently, the rates were grouped into three class sizes,
namely, 16-25,000; 26-35,000; and 36-50,000 long-ton tankers. From
these classes, the mean and standard deviation for the three class sizes
sailing over the same route were estimated. By this method, comparisons
of transportation costs between class sizes of tankers traveling the
same number of miles were made.
The nautical miles used in the oil diagrams for distances from
port to port and the tanker class size groups are representative of the
average voyage distances and vessel sizes predominately in use by the
shipping trade.
-------
The data for the barge table and curve were obte.ined from a rate
schedule published by the San Francisco Barge Traffic: Bureau, San
Francisco, Calif, (ll).
The data and analyses are for tankers and barges-for-hire only
and no estimation of costs of shipping are made for leased or oil
company owned ships because data is not available. The trade refers
to rates made for tankers-for-hire as the spot market.
The tanker freight rates listed in the tables are the sum of the
average fixtures and the flat rate quoted for the respective tanker
voyages. The distances for each voyage in nautical miles were obtained
from the British-Petroleum Tanker Co., Ltd., London, England (l).
Analysis
The analyses of the data for oil differs from the analyses for
coal. Regression analyses could not be used to show comparative
transportation costs relative to distance because data for distance
of haul were not available for tanker voyages other than the mean
*
distance for the voyages by tankers-for-hire.
The dispersion of rate charges between classes and within classes
for the same route are mainly caused by the supply and demand of
available tankers at a particular location at a point in time. Periods
of greatest demand occur during the fall and winter months.
About 30 percent of the total world tanker fleet operates in the
spot market at any one time. The supply of tankers in the spot market
is inelastic. In times of great demand, additional tonnage cannot be
-------
31
obtained in the short term and when freight tanker demand is low, the
scrapping of obsolete and worn tankers is increased (l6).
Forecasting the supply, demand, and price relationship of oil
tanker transportation in the spot market would be almost impossible.
However, the data and the analyses have value. Freight costs for
specific voyages by tankers of the same class size sailing at different
periods of time during 1970 differ because rates are negotiated on a
single voyage basis at a point in time, and they are dependent on the
supply of and demand for tankers. Figures 15-18 show that rates on
the average for the tankers in the 16,000 to 25,000 ton class are
always higher than the rates of the larger ton classes. Analysis of
barge rates to San Francisco inland ports shown in figure 19 indicates
the economies associated with distance for barges in the 1,300 to
3,200 long ton class.
Foreign tanker freight rates to the New York SMSA for an average
distance of 1,800 miles from ports in the Caribbean are on the average
0.36 cents per long ton mile (table 2). The long ton mile average
cost for an average distance of about I*,000 miles from the Mediterranean,
North Africa, and Europe is 0.21 cents. The average cost per long ton
mile from the Persian Gulf via the Cape of Good Hope, a distance of
about 12,000 miles, is 0.20 cents. Therefore, economies of haul
probably exist.
From the Caribbean the cost of transporting oil per million Btu
average 12.50 cents while the same cost from the Mediterranean, North
Africa, and Europe is 17-50 cents. The average Btu cost for the
-------
•CD
8
-0-0
oo
THOUSAND TONS
o (36-50)
= 5.03
s|.9
n*!3
(26-35)
x=5.52
"•=1.53
n-22
B (16-25)
x=7.!3
<^=l.2
n-33
I
2.85
3.85
4.85
5.85
a85
7.85
8.85
9.85
10.85
DOLLARS PER LONG TON
FIGURE 15. - Negotiated tanker rates from U.S. Gulf to U.S. Atlantic
Coast, 1970, by size of tankers carrying residual fuel
oil for single voyages, average 1,800 miles.
-------
THOUSAND TONS
(36-50)1
-------
1 1 1 1 1 1
THOUSAND TONS
\JO 1OU|lr^^'^ «H^— 0 1 0' O O -O —0
x=8.74
-------
T
T
THOUSAND TONS
(36-50)o—
(26-35)*-
(16-J
I
I
I
1=22.95
vr
-------
\fc=5.23-0.575(x)
= -0.74
Yc=5.27e-a°1811
r=-O.83
Yc=3.997x-
-------
37
Persian Gulf voyage was about 1+8.0 cents per million. Therefore, the
higher Btu costs from areas outside the Caribbean area partly explains
why only 30 percent (9-3 million long tons) is imported to the New
York SMSA and 70 percent (21.7 million long tons) comes from the
Caribbean.
In 1970 approximately 1.65 million long tons (12 million barrels)
were transported from the U.S. Gulf to the New York SMSA.
Table 3, showing data for oil transported to San Francisco SMSA
in 1970, reveals that no oil was transported from the U.S. Gulf and
imported from the Persian Gulf and only 5-6 million barrels were
delivered from the Caribbean, Europe, and Indonesia.
A comparison of costs per million Btu indicates why practically
all of the residual received at San Francisco harbor was imported from
•she Caribbean. The average cost per million Btu from this area was
21.0 cents compared to about 1*2.0 cents from Europe and 3^.0 cents
from Indonesia. Oil does not move from the U.S. Gulf to the West
Coast because can be brought in from the Caribbean for less money.
It costs twice as much to deliver oil from the U.S. Gulf to the West
Coast as it does to ship it from the Gulf to ports in the North
Atlantic (16).
-------
38
Analysis of the data reveals that tanker rates for transporting
residual oil are on the average less when transporting by larger versus
smaller tankers. The most economical supply of oil for use in the
San Francisco and New York SMSA's is shipped from the Caribbean.
One of the greatest problems encountered in this section vas the
inability to gather data on flat rates and negotiated fixture rates
that could be directly correlated to distance and size of tanker.
Because of this, mean distances and grouped tanker sizes were used in
place of regression analyses.
For a more thorough analysis of the cost parameters in shipping
oil, data should be collected for similar time periods to isolate those
costs associated vith the supply and demand of tankers at a point in
time. Regression analyses could then be used in a more meaningful
manner to show any economies of haul which may be associated with dis-
tance or size of tanker.
-------
39
TRANSMISSION OF NATURAL GAS
A description of natural gas pipeline systems and transmission
costs for delivery of gas to the New York and San Francisco SMSA's is
presented in this section. Natural gas pipeline systems to the two
study areas are shown in figure 20 for 1970.
The selling price of gas transported by interstate pipeline if
regulated by the Federal Power Commission (FPC) to the extent that it
allows a reasonable rate of return to the transmission gas company.
According to the gas industry, the higher rates are caused by
costs incurred to build new pipelines or modernize old ones which must
necessarily be paid for through sales revenues.
Table 5 shows the systems, points of origin, effective date of
rate, annual volume of gas to SMSA, pipeline distance, and cost of trans-
mission.
Gas transmission companies and pipeline routes were obtained from
the FPC (j_). Transmission rates, pipeline mileage, and volume of gas
delivered were obtained from transmission companies, gas utilities, and
FPC reports (6). >
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.,
El Paso National Gas Co., and Pacific Gas and Electric Utility Co. con-
tributed all necessary data and information. Rates and gas volumes for
Texas Eastern Transmission Co. and Manufacturers Light and Heat Co.
were obtained by subtracting their total gas purchases from sales to the
New York SMSA in 1969. The pipeline mileage for each of these two sys-
tems was measured from an FPC pipeline systems map.
-------
TABLE 5. - Natural gas pipeline transmission rates to Hev York and San Francisco SMSA's
Transmission company
Origin
Annual Cents per Mcf
Date volume Line and million
effective million c.f. miles B.T.U./mile
Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.
to Nev York SMSA
Texas Eastern Transmission Co.
to New York SMSA and Algonquin Gas
Transmission Co. to Nevark SMSA
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
to New York SMSA
Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. and
Home Gas Co. to New York SMSA
El Paso Natural Gas Co. - Texas to
Ariz. - Cal. border
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Ariz. -
border to San Francisco 8HSA
Pacific Gas Transmission Co. Canada
to Oregon - Cal. border
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Oregon
Cal. border to San Francisco SMSA
Willacy, Texas 1970
Hidalgo Co., Texas 1969
Warren Co., N.J. 1969
Willacy Co., Texas
Vermillion Co., La.
New Orleans, La. 1971
Monongalia Co., W. Va.
Wood Co., W. Va. 1971
Yoakum Co., Texas
San Juan Co., Utah
San Juar Co., N.M. 19T2
Cal.
Topok, Mohave Co., Ariz. 1972
Kingsgate, B.C., Canada 1972
Malin, Klamath Co.,
Oregon 1972
238,000 1,800 0.011
5l* ,000
128,000 1,885 0.013
20,075 1,900 0.020
8,000
U12.000
1*31,000
1*27,000
1*50 0.031
U12.000 1,000 0.019
550 0.008
600 0.015
350 0.010
-------
r J,
foufii /
OAKOT4 \
Mdfk S~ mt Ctacttfe Co
MO
mi OMtric c.
ISO
FIGURE 20. - Natural gas pipeline systems to the New York and San Francisco SMSA's, 1970
-------
1*2
Analysis of Data
Based or. information and estimated purchases and costs for 1972
(10), Pacific Gas and Electric Co. will purchase seme 839 billion cubic
feet of gas for resale. Of this, about 1*27 billion cubic feet (51 per-
cent) will come from Canada and Ul2 billion cubic feet (U9 percent)
will be supplied by El Paso Natural Gas Co., Texas.
The Canadian gas will be received at Kingsgate, B. C., by Pacific
Gas Transmission Company and transmitted 600 miles to Malin, Oregon,
at the California border at a total trip cost of 9.00 cents per Mcf
or 0.015 cents per mile which is also the cost.per million Btu.
From Malin, Oregon, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. will transmit the
gas to the San Francisco SMSA at 0.010 cent per Mcf por mile or million
Btu for the 350 mile run.
Gas from the Permian and San Juan Basins will provide about Ul2
million cubic feet at a pipeline transmission cost of 19.0 cents per
thousand cubic feet or 0.019 cents per mile for the 1,000 mile trip to
the Arizona border (£). From the California-Arizona border the gas
will be transmitted at a cost of 0.008 cents per thousand cubic feet
per mile or a million Btu for the 550 mile run.
Four major gas pipeline systems supply New York SMSA. Trans-
continental Gas Pipeline starts at Brownsville, Texas. About 238
billion cubic feet of gas per year moves to New York SMSA at a cost of
0.011 cents per million Btu per mile. This cost is applicable only
when the 100 percent load-supply factor of 600 million cubic feet de-
livered to Philadelphia SMSA, New Jersey SMSA, and New York SMSA is
considered (I5j.
-------
Of the 987 billion cubic feet of gas that flowed through Texas
Eastern's lines to consumers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and
New York in 1969, only 5k billion were delivered to New York SMSA (6).
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. pipeline, partially owned by Texas
Eastern, takes off from Texas Eastern's line at the Pennsylvania-New
Jersey border below Phillipsburg, New Jersey. It supplied some 128
billion cubic feet of gas to the Newark area, a part of New York
SMSA (6) in 1969. The line is about 125 miles in length (J_). The
average transmission rate for this 1,885 mile pipeline system is 0.013
cents per billion Btu per mile (6_).
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. eurrently transmits about 20 billion
cubic feet of gas to the New York SMSA (13). Gas through this system
traveled 1,900 miles, and according to Tennessee Gas, the transmission
cost for their system to.the New York SMSA is about 0.020 cents per
thousand cubic feet per mile.
Manufacturers Light and Heat Co. sold about 8 billion cubic feet
of gas in the New York SMSA in 1969 through its affiliate Home Gas
Co. (6_). The pipeline system is about 1*50 miles long. Gas purchases
in West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Ohio were added to complement the
supply. The transportation rates which include profit are calculated
by subtracting the weighted average purchase price of gas (3^.05 cents
per Mcf) from the weighted average delivered selling price (U8.28
cents per Mcf) (6_). This yields a rate of 0.031 cents per million Btu
per mile.
-------
Gas sealing price in the New York SMSA by transmission companies
to electric utilities and gas distributing companies was 1*2.22 cents.
per million Btu in 1970 (8). The average cost for transmitting gas on
a national basis is about 1.0 cent per million Btu per 100 miles.
Summary
The natural gas industry including its interstate transmission
systems, operating practices, and rate adjustments which include a nor-
mal profit is regulated by the FPC.
Gas transmission companies indicate that for a rule-ol'-thumb
estimate, 1,000 cubic feet of gas can be moved 100 miles for 1.0 cent.
The average rate for the pipeline systems in this report was 1.3 cents/
thousand cubic feet per 100 miles.
The average cost of transmitting gas frcuu che Texas fields to the
New York SMSA is 28.0 cents per thousand cubic feet. The cost of mov-
ing gas from the Texas fields to the San Francisco SMSA is 16 cents
per thousand cubic feet.
For future study, it may be possible that costs of transmission
only could be obtained for most companies serving several major metro-
politan areas from rate adjustment applications filed with FPC in
1970 and 1971.
-------
RECOMMENDATIONS
This report perused the parameters of the complex fossil fuel
transportation universe. Although a significant amount of data have
been collected, certain areas are still incomplete. It is therefore
recommended that a more thorough analysis be made of the individual
parameters vithin the transportation system by (l) gathering all the
data possible to complete the transportation universe; (2) making
greater stratifications of the data collected to gain more precise in-
formation of the parameters in the system which affect cost; (3) ob-
taining theoretical cost structures for fossil fuels to markets where
they are currently not marketed, i.e., the cost of shipping western
coal to eastern markets and the cost of marketing residual fuel oil
further into the interior of the continental U.S. It is also recom-
mended that an analysis be made to compare and offer an explanation
for the consumption of coal, oil, and gas in major SMSA's.
-------
1*6
REFERENCES
1. British-Petroleum Tanker Company Limited. World-Wide Marine
Distance Tables, 1958, OM pp.
2. Bureau of Mines. Mineral Industry Surveys. Crude Petroleum,
Petroleum Products, and Natural Gas Liquids. December, 1970,
37 pp.
3. Delaware River Port Authority. Waterborne Commerce Report, 1970,
p. 76, 9U.
U. Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Waterborne Commerce
of the United States. National Summaries, 1969, p. 85.
5. El Paso Natural Gas Company, El Paso, Texas. Personal Communication.
May 12, 1970.
6. Federal Power Commission. Annual Report. Form 2, December 31,
1969, pp. 519-520, 535-536.
7. Federal Power Commission. Major Pipelines Map. June 30, 1970.
8. Federal Power Commission. News Release No. 16987. September lU,
1970.
9. Jones Act, Section 883, Title U6, United States Code.
10. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, California.
Personal communication. May 12, 1971.
11. San Francisco Barge Tariff Bureau. Local Freight Tariff No. 1.
1968, p. 10.
12. Standard Oil Company, San Francisco, California. Personal
communication. May 3, 1971.
-------
1*7
13. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Houston, Texas. Personal
communication. May 18, 1971-
lU. . The Association of Ship Brokers and Agents, Incorporated.
Worldwide Tanker Nominal Freight Scale and American Tanker Rate
Schedule. 1970, pp. 98-99, 12U.
15. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corporation, Houston, Texas.
Personal communication. May 11, 1971.
16. United Nations Conference of Trade and Development. Level and
Structure of Freight Rates, Conference Practices and Adequacy of
Shipping Services. 1969, pp. 23-28.
-------
COAL APPENDIX
-------
TABLE A-1. - Bituminous coal received at oven-coke plant* in the United States, 1969
location
Oven-cake plant of plant
Miriam
r^dre Coke Co. Holt
Brpchllc Steel Corp. Cedsdcn
Brpusllc Steel Corp. Thorns
U.S. Pipe and Poandry Co. BlradngbaB
'lit ii By-product* Tarraot
U.S. Steel Corp. Palrfleld
BoodMard Iron Co. UoodMrd
California
' Kaiser Steel Corp. Pontan*
Colorado
Colorado Paal ft Iron
Steal Co. Paetolo
Illinois
General •More Corp. Kudrrgm
Grmnit* Cltjr Steel Co. Graclt* Clt,
Coal nor
Lft-ofcoqn,
ranMiaail MlnlAg Co.
Consolldatloc CoeJ Co.
Ikwk* Bett nolng Co.
Brpufclle Steel Corp-
Black DleHxtd Coal
Htrtlng CO.
Bankhead tog. Co.. Inc.
Cllncbflcld Coal-Dlv.
of the Ptttston Co.
Republic Steel Corp.
Cllnchfteld Coel-DI*.
of the PI It (too Co.
U.S. Pipe ft Pdrr. Co.
u.s. Pipe ft fury. Co.
Slab Pork Coal Co.
winding Gulf Coal. loe.
I mm Coal Co.
Alabama Cy- Product •
Winding OttlT Coala. Inc
•linden Se-ell Coal Co.
Beards Pork Coal mg.
Corp-
U.S. Steel Corp.
Ueetvmland Coal Co.
Ve»tx>reland Coal Co.
Ueitvmlml C**al Co.
Barge". A. t. Co.
VoodMard Iron Co.
Coal Proceaalng Corp-
Conaolldatlon Coal Co.
Kaiser Steel Corp.
Kaiser Steel Corp.
•lid-Continent Coal
and Coke Co.
Consolidation Coal Co.
Colorado Pual ft Iron
Steel Co.
fftlTTHC" Coal Co.
Winding ftii* Coal, Inc.
Winding r**\' Coal, Inc
Karma tog. Corp.
Eastern Associated
Coal Corp.
Preesaso Coal tog. Corp.
Pi i i»in Coal tog. Corp.
•abare. Coal Co. , Inc.
Old Ben Coal Corp.
Coal Corp.
VlodlBg f**\T Coals, toe.
cbaees
ata.or.dn.
Cotb
Crane Cre*k
Bavks Brat
ftajrre
Bo. 3
Cobb
•bas Bo. 2
Sarr*
tost- Bo. 2
Beeale
Plat Top
Slab Pork
leteAlpla
ItSMM
Itulae
cmrtop i, 2. i 3
Bo. 2
Beard a Fork
Concord
Pine Drench
Osaka
Pnscott
Herat Block ton
WMlfi.
Dial am
JcnkiAjonea
Bo. 1
Tork Canyon
Dutch Creek
Jenkinjonea
Allen
Via* Hill Bo. 3
currtop BO. i, 2. 3
East Calf
Barmn
Keystone Bo. 1
Orient Bo. 3
Orient Bo. J
-Sahara Vo. 6
Bo. £1
Vaartco Bo. fc
West Oalf Bo. 5
Shipping point
Jasper
NeCoaaa
Page
Sa/re
Black Dlacond
Jasper
«*nt*
Sayre
CllnchHeld
BeaaLe Mine
rut Top
Slab Pork
lejcAlpln
Itaann
teuloe
CllfTtop
Rock Lick
Beardi Fork
Concord
Pla* Branch
Stonega
Oaaka
V«at Blockton
Woodward
Dldana
Pagelon
Stnnjrslde
Tork Canyae
rkgetaa
Veaton
Craig
dlfftop
Bast Oulf
tereaa
Keystone
Orient
•Jest PnokTort
Sarrlatarg
Sesser
Wbarton
tec !*•
Comty
Ualkwr
Hsrcer
Payette
Jefferson
Jefferson
Walker
ftusaell
JefferMn
Bus sell
Jefferson
Jefferson
talelgb
lUelgb
Vjreedng
Jeffereon
Payett*
Fayttte
Farette
Jefferson
VI H
VI H
Via*
Bibb
Jefferson
Vise
HcDo-ell
Carbon
Colfax
Pltkln
He Dow 11
IAS Anl^f
Noffst
£"«
Hxr*»n*n
HtDo^U
JdTereoo
Pranklln
Sallo*
Pmklln
Boone
Mn» lorstlon
State
AlabasB
v*st Virginia
Vest Virginia
AleboM
AlabMM
Alabsaat
Virginia
Alabssm
Virginia
Alabsam
llstnae
Vest Virginia
Vest Virginia
Vast Virginia
.L^,.
Vest VtrglnU
West Virginia
Meat Virginia
Alabsaa
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Alabej*.
Alabaem
Virginia
V«rt Virginia
Utah
Bew Iktrico
Colorado
West Virginia
Colorado
Colorado
Vest Virginia
Vast Virginia
Virginia
Vest Virginia
Illinois
nilnola
Ullnol*
lUlnoii
Heat Virgin!*
Ves\ Vlrglola
Coal
district
n
7
B
13 .
13
13
6
13
8
1
1
1
7
13
B
8
B
13
13
8
7
2O
ifl
16
7
17
17
7
7
B
7
10
10
10
10
8
7
FreLgtit
rate
Al abeam
Focabontss
tana-ba
AlabesB,
Alabesja
Tiller
AlabasH
Tiller
llanasa
AUhaaa
Virginian
Bev River
Vlrglolan
Almbeaa
Bev ftlver
Virginian
Alabea*
Clinch Valley
Clinch Valley
Clinch Valley
Alabaaa
Alabaaaj
Clinch Valley
Pocahootas
Castle Gate
toUn
Cartendale
Pocanontas
Oak Hllla
Oak Bills
Bev m*cr
Tbacker
rDCabontas
Oroup 6
OnKp 6
Oroup 6
Group 6
r— — *..
nrgiBlaa
Hrthod
of
All-rail
All*rall
All -rail
Ul-r.ll
All-rail
Ail-ratl
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All -rail
AU-rall
All -rail
All -rail
All-rail
All-rail
Operate! ov
All-rail
All-rail
AU-rall
Opera t«i o«
AU-rall
MA- < all'
All-rail
All- rail
AU-rail
AU-raU
Operate* 01
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-rall
All-rail
all-rail
AU-rall
All-rail
All-rail
Bate
ton
t 3-33
5-79
5.91
1.96
2.06
2.51
5-91
EA
5-91
EA
EA
5-77
5-77
5-77
BA
5-77
5-n
5.77
n R.B. HA
b.89
It 89
k.W
2.07
11 B.ft. HA
5.77
k.S9
6.15
6.09
16.93
m B.B. u
12.16
12.16
7. 12
7.37
1 &9
1^63
l.!>9
5.99
i.Ti
Tnacport«tlon cbaj
Uppllc.tla.
»I«»1««
5,000 U»-trainio*d
5,000 too-tralnload
Single-car
Single -car
Single-car
5,300 un-tralnload
Single-car
5.0OO too-tralnload
Operates own railroad
Operate* own railroad
5. 000 ton-tralnload
5.OOO ton-traiaload
5.000 too-tralnload
Single-car
5,000 ton-tralnload
5.OOO Un-tratnloed
5.000 ton-tralnload
5.00O ton-trelnloed
5.00O ton-tralnload
5.00O ton-tralnloaa
5.000 ton-tralnload
5.0OO ton-tralnload
5.000 ton-tralnload
Bot lesa than 200,000
t!^-J0^UT
5,000 ton-tralnload
Single-car
7.2OO too-tralnlmd
7,200 toa-tralnload
Single-car
Single-car
2.500 too-tralnloed
2 500 tTi-T ral n!.' '**
2^500 ton-tralaloe4
2.500 toootralnload
Single-car
5.OOO toQ-traValokd
mieagt
96
529
629
53 .
131
365
375
26
L12
(.12
1*12
M5
26
•87
510
515
375
375
375
U)
BA
•50
750
900
930
2. *00
EA
275
1.1.50
575
585
120
135
IbO
107
5*5
575
Bate per
tna-eale
'ceata)
2-5
1.1
-9
2.1
2.3
0.7
1-6
5A
1.*
BA
BA
l.k
I.*
i.k
u
1.2
1.1
1.1
M
1.3
1-3
1.3
5-2
BA
1.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
H
1.5
o.s
0.9
1.2
1-3
1.2
1-2
U
!.">
1.1
l.O
-------
TABLE A-l. - Biluminous coal rec«ivod at ov«n-cok« plants in th» United Sfat«», 1949—Continued
location Coal Berctaaae*
0*«a-«ek* pleat of via* •_. of con»acj
Ulinola (cootLatatd)
XcterUfce Steel Corp. Chicago lalaad Cretk Coal Co.
Conaolldat loo Coal Co.
Winding Oulf Coal*, Inc.
rreoau Coal ttag. Corp.
[cteraattooml Barrertar Ca. Chicago International Hamster
Co.
United rocttootai Coal.,
Attymlty Sacaeleia Coal
Co.
C14 Ben Coal Corp.
Aadgo tekalea* Coal Co.
Itavnn Coal Co.
Brpubllc 8t*«l Corp. Chicago Republic Steel Corp.
Minding Gulf CoaU, ;oc.
lodlaaa (6)
CUUeaa Gaa ft Coke Utility teuUanapoUa Barton Coal Co.
Nu-garet Ana Coal Co.
J«vell Mage Coal Corp.
Winding Oulf Coal*. lac.
tiland Creek Coal Co.
Indiana Da* ft Cbealeal Coip.Terre Haiit* Winding Gulf Coal*, Inc.
Aafacrat Coal Co.
Conaolldatloa Coal Co.
Itavon Coal Co.
Batllfr eutoon ttag. Co.
Inland 6t*«l Co. Eait Chicago Blchop Coal Co.
Inland Steel Co.
Freeman Coal (tag. Corp.
rreeaaa Coal Nng. Corp.
Corp.
Hat land -Qkfaorn Coal
Corp.
laland Creek Coal Co.
,'ewell Ridge Coal Corp.
0.8. Stael Corp. Gary U.S. Ste«l Corp.
O.8. steal Corp.
[aland Creek Coal Co.
Freeaan Ccal Wig. Corp.
Toungibown Sbeet ft T<*>e Co. Eaat Calcago Yotngatovn Mine* Corp.
Olg* Coal Co.
Ctaberlaad Collieries
Inc.
Toe.
Gauler Coal ft Coke Co.
katkleaam Btaal Corp. Bum* narmv totn-dkhoro
B»thleba» Hla*a Corp.
CD.
CeMolttatlon Coal Co.
Old Bea Coal Corp.
•am of aiae
Bo. 26
CCkWB
W«rt Culf Bo. 6
Orlaot Bo. 5
Ultcoculfi Steel Co.
Indian Ridge Bo. 6
Premier
Bo. 21
Aml9>
TUauo
Republic
Bortoa
tfcrgaret Aon
Jewell Valler
Bo. !•
Coal itoantala
feCAlplo
Undala Mo. 1
Jenklnjonea
Itmnn
toccoon
Blinop
Inland
Orient Bo. 3
Orient Bo, 5
Sprwe Fork
Peter Cre«k.
Quad
Jewell Valley
*»- 2,6.9.10.11*
Boa. 7 ft 32
Bo. 27
Orient Bo. J
Danua
Olga
CUbtwood Bo. 1
nrd Bo. 2
Tlota Bo. 1
Bo. 27
[da*av
QjUnmd
Torkay Cap
BO. a
Snlpplnc point
Ftaldn
Cccle*
*t»l Frankfort
Btchata
BorUi Fork
Premier
Seiser
Aadiro
Itaann
»mj-rowt»oe
Eaxt Gulf
Rortoo
Conaway
Jewell Valley
Winding Oulf
Coal tountda
MtcAlpln
Aatwratdale
Pagetoo
Itawn
TlkerlUe
BlBbop
Seaaar
Orient
Heat Frankfort
Bl«gi
ftielpa
B ft V RS
Jewell Valley
»%iiiaon
Lyncfl
Holdn
Ortaat
DebM
g^TU-i^
ftiUlu
Borton
Tloea
Ducbaat
tow
Le*
Beaaer
Court*
lfc!)CM«ll
Kalelgh
FranUlo
Rarlac
McDowell
ffcDowell
FranUln
Balelgb
Vytatfng
Pike
Kalelgn
Wite
Buchamn
Buchanan
tolelEb
Ralelgb
logan
teDoveU
WytKlog
Pit*
NcDoweU
J«fTcr*on
Jeffcnon
Franalln
PUa
Pike
Plkw
BaebaBan
Mcttonll
Barlao
Jefferaon
Logan
McDowell
dckinaoo
Dlckinaon
nebolaa
Latetwr
Bmrlon
ncBoUj
Hmrcer
rraaklln
mna !~-tl<»
State
Hen Vlrglala
y*«t Virginia
Hett Vlrftola
Ut*t Virginia
IllUwl.
Kentucky
weit Virginia
Vert Virginia
llllnoU
Vect Virginia
Heat Virginia
Kentucky
Vect Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
tfe«t Virginia
West Virginia
West Virginia
Weat Virginia
Weat Virginia
Meat Virginia
tentuckj
Wevt Virginia
Ollnol*
Ollnola
Ullool*
teotuckjr
Centucky
Ken tacky
nrglola
u«»v Virginia
batucky
Heat Virginia
tUlnola
Vest Virginia
Wert Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
We»t VlrglaU
KaniMCky
Ue*t TlrajUla
•ert vtrttala
We*t Virginia
lUlnola
Coal
dlrtrtrt
6
7
7
7
10
•5
7
7
10
7
7
8
7
8
8
7
7
8
7
8
7
7
8
7
ID
10
10
a
8
8
7
7
8
8
10
t
7
e
a
3
e
3
7
7
10
rale-
Urtrlrt
L>0u>
Pocaaootax
Pocahontaa
Virginian
nroup h
Harlan
Pocabontaa
Pocaboc*aa
Croup 6
Virginian
Vtrginlao
Thanker
Virginian
Clinch Valley No. ,'•
Thacker
Upper Buchanan
Bew River
Virginian
Bew B»fr
Logan
Pocabonta*
Vtrglnlaa
Ttwcker
PocaboBta*
Group 6
Croup 6
Croup 0
Tbacker
Utaeker
Tnaekcr
Upper Buchanan
rocahontaa
Bar Ian
logan
UDtan
Tug River
TUler
TlUer
Caaley
KBBtwky
Falraoot
Qrejcanrler
rocatanta^
Group 6
•kfthof
of
All -rail
All-nil
All-rail
All-rail
AU-rall
All-n.ll
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-rall
All-nil
AU-rall
AU-rall
All -nil
All-rail
AU-rall
AU-rall
All-rail
All -rail
All-nil
AU-rall
AU-nll
All* rail
AU-rall
AU-nll
All-ntl
AU-rall
All -rail
AU-nll
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-nll
AU-nll
All -rail
AU-nll
All-nil
AU-nll
AU-rall
AU-nll
All-nil
AU-nll
AU-rall
AU-rall
AU-rall
All-nit
All -rail
Bate
per
to*
5^77
5-77
5.77
S.99
9-52
i.n
5.TT
».T7
5.TT
»•»
5.T7
».SJ
k.83
k.95
U.9J
%.83
5-2*
5-12
5.2*
5.12
5-12
5.77
3-67
3-67
1.63
5-52
5-52
5-52
5.77
5.77
5-52
5-52
5.52
5.77
5.52
5-52
5-77
5. $2
5.T7
S-77
2-99
TraMumtatloa cnar
Application
7,200 too-tnlnload
7.200 un-tnlnlMd
7.200 ton-tralnload
7,2OO too-tnlnload
2.500 ton-tninlr>aa
7,200 ton-traloload
7.2OO too-tralnload
7.200 toa-tralnload
2.500 ton-traloload
7.2OO tOD-tnlnload
7.2OO too-tnlnload
7.200 ton-tninload
7,200 ton-tnlcloan
5,OOO ton-tnlnload
$,000 ton-tnlnload
5,OOO ton-lralnload
5,000 ton-tnlaload
5,000 ton-tnloload
5,000 ton-tnlnload
5.0OO too-tnloload
5. 000 too-tralnload
5.OOO too-tnlDload
5,OOO tcn-tnlnload
7,20O too-tnloload
2.5CQ toa-tralnload
2,5OO ton-tnlnload
2. 50O UD-tralnloaa
7,200 too-tnlnload
7,200 toD-tnlnload
7,200 ton-tralnload
7.20O toD-tralnload
7,200 too-tnlnload
7,200 ton-tralnload
7.ZOO too-tralnload
7.2OO ton-tralnload
7.20O ton-tnlnload
7.2OO toa-tralnload
7,200 too-tralnlaad
7,200 too-tralnload
S.C90 tOB-tnimload
«a*le-
S/3
fTI
5*5
KS
552
••52
5JJ
•M
560
535
535
I«Ofc
J9»
176
**33
h66
1.76
V*
5*5
309
309
309
535
535
535
535
5k2
530
5»2
309
512
5""5
55J
580
612
551
505
5*
577
309
ht« prr
1.3
1.0
l.O
1.0
.96
1.0
1.5
1.7
1.0
1.0
l.O
1.0
1.3
.a
-9
.9
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
l.O
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
•*
l.O
1.3
1.0
1.1
L.I
1.1
1.0
•A
1.1
1.1
.99
.95
-9*
1.0
•A
1.1
1.0
.95
-------
Maryland '
Barthlenem StMl Corp.
Mctlam
Allied Chemical Carp.
Great Uk»m St««l Corp.
Z"« Iilam
Moneeota
«>Pper« Co., Inc.
U.S. 8t«al Corp.
TABLE A- I, - Bituminous cool received c! oven-coke plonts in the United Stoles, 1969—Continued
•*" «f coapao, Ba» o/ .!,»
Se»»t-aol.e; M.. (•lllwllfcre.ood
Srael-Solvey lw... ' All led ^Shannon Branch
Seael-Sol.er tl.. fmiedlTralea
«raco Steel Corp. BaMn Hooa
« Coniolllatlon Coal Co. Crane Cretk
Bf.Mef.oi Knei Corp. la/ford
fctnl.he. Mine. Corp. Cen-.wrj »o. 101
Be'.nleriea tlnef Corp. ao "
Bethlrnra Klnei Corp. Bo 32
»thl Bo. 9
Cllncbrield Coal M..
of the Plttaton Co. Hoac BO 3
Buffalo Knlni Co. Buffalo
. Sf.lppin^ pair
Har*"™*1
Capela
Tralee
Itobln food
tCcumj
Kayford
Century
Ebemturg
Hrvloc
Johr.it own
v^rlBUina
Idamy
Century
r»TT|r1»^
Dmw
r«in
Bartt
Slab Fork
Alpoca
RorthTork
Cornelia
Lochgelly
Harvwood
Trale*
Capel.
Jcvell VtUley
Pine Branch
Stooe
Susanna
Holden
currtop
Jeffrey
Slat Fork
Sprlngton
Alrco
He radon
Herndon
EKsett
Scarlett Clen
Wtchell jct.
tfcbltrt
Soul re
rfc radon
Cruncy
Keyttorw
Uharton
Pllbirt
• & W RB
Lormdo
rt Conjitr
Fajtrtt*
(r COM 11
*^aUn«
Booo*
rc.r
Kantwha
Butour
Cauftrl.
CaM>rl«
CobrU
Wae-hlngion
(fcrioo
t%rlon
Letcher
Utcher
Pike
Latma
Ralelgb
VyoBBjog
NcDcmll
Rlcnolaa
Fay«tt«
Fayette
WyoBlag
Hero-ell
Buchanan
•Use
Plkat
IfcDowctl
Kanawti*
Loean
Payette
BOOM
Raleleh
*rcer
Floyd
Vycmlng
Wyoalng
Logan
Ml ago
Mngo
HlCagD
McDowell
vyoBla,]
Buchanan
fcOovell
Boom
NcDowll
RujMLl
Lo.tn
Slat..
«*»t Virginia
**V«t Virginia
**t«t Vlrglou
Ueit Virginia
V»»\ Virginia
«e§t Virginia
W«»t Virginia
->m»>lvinl4
rttnniylrmnlk
Pwmt/lvMl,
P«na*]rl»anl«
u«it Virginia
Wait Virginia
Kentucky
K
Kentucky
tltivt Vlrglnl*
W«*t Virginia
Went Virginia
Uc.it Virginia
W«»t Virgin!.
U«it Virginia
Wvit Virginia
U«tt Virginia
«e«t VlrRiola
Virginia
Virginia
Ucit Virginia
Ue*t Virginia
««it Virginu
Ven Virginia
Ue.rt Virginia
West Virginia
Veit Virginia
Kentucky
Ueit Virginia
U«at Virginia
U«.t Virginia
Ue*t Virginia
tftat Virginia
We.t Virgin!*
«*«t Virginia
W««t Virginia
Virginia
Ueat Virginia
W«at Vlrglnl*
V«it Virginia
Virginia
U«at Virginia
£33
producing
««irlgt
8
7
7
g
7
e
3
1
1
j
3
3
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
8
7
a
7
7
7
8
8
7
8
8
7
8
7
7
8
7
7
8
8
5
8
7
7
7
7
0
7
8
8
.
rat*
district
Kana*ba
Tug Plrrrr
Virginian
K«n..Mba
Foe ahon tai
Kanawha
Clark* burg
Clcarn Id
Clcarfl Id
Clearr: U
VeitKireUnd
FalTOn
ratrvn
CUhorn
Elknora
EUhorn
Logan
Virginian
Virginian
Pocahoatu
Hew River
Virginian"
Kaaavtia
Virginian
Poeahontaj
Upp«r Buchanan
Clinch Valley Bo. 2
Thicker
Tug River
Uigan
Creenbrler
Kanawtw
••w RlTcr
Big Sandy
Virginian
Virginian
Logan
Thacker
Thackjr
Pocahontaa
Virginian
Uppvr BuchanaU
Pbeahonta*
PocabontA*
Tlllar
Kanantia
of
tetl-rlrvr
tall-river
Rall-rtvrr
Rmll-rlv«r
Rall-tlie (Balto)
Rail- M« (Balto!
Rail- Ide (Balto'i
Ball- ld« (Bmltct
Rail- Idc 'Balto
Rail- Ide (Balto)
Rail- Ide (Balto)
Rail- Ide (Btlto)
Ball- Ide (Balto)
Rail- Ide (Balto)
Rail- Ide (Balto)
Rail- Ida (Balto)
Rait- Ide (Balto)
Rail- ld« (Balta)
Rail- Idc (Balto)
Rail- Ide (Balto)
Rail- Ide (blto)
Rail- Ide (Balto)
All -rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rmll
Rmll-Uke
Ball to ToledtA/
— Hto-~«
^Jo
do
do
-— -do----
Rail-Lake
Rail to Tolcdc*/
-do
_..^o----
do
do
--_-do----
do
do
Rail-Lake
Rail to Toledo*/
—-do--
do
Rail-Lake
Rmll to Toledob/
do— -
P«r
1.80
1.96
1.96
i-n
5.78
6.10
5-Ofc
b.76
».rt
(..76
5-37
5.0h
5. Ok
6.10
6.10
6.10
6.10
5.78
5.78
5.78
S.10
5.78
5.53
5.3*
5.8J*
5.BJ.
5.53
• 3^
.Ik
.Id
• 3J»
.lh
• ^
• &
.11.
• 3*
-3''
.lit
.lb
. lb
.Ik
-y>
J.79
J-79
J.T9
.61
.79
.61
fig. £*ll££ 5L
Rail to Kontlaeton.
W.Va. I/ 86 centB-
barged to plant
...^k>.—
do
Bu-fe to n^ltUnrc Harbor
2/i/
— -do
do
to
do
do
do-—
do
do
do
— -do- —
—-do-—
do—-
do
do
do- —
do
do— -
5.0OO too-tralnload
5.0OO too-tralnload
5.0OO ton-lralnload
5.OOO ton-tralnload
5.OOO ton-tralnload
Lafca vaaael charge
11.30 per ton
do
do
do-
-—do
do
— —do
— -do- —
lAke reiiel charge
11.16 per ton
do
no
— -do
.—do
»o
Veaael-1.73:Rall-1.80
-do-
-do— -
Veaael-1.7?
do
leage
60
121
163
112
IB
U.9
30k
257
260
260
307
235
30k
kJ5
k30
k25
k69
378
M3
376
!90
38k
350
•95
515
525
520
351
39k
309
39k
388
3k9
392
k2fi
397
39k
39k
361
309
351
351
39k
39k
38k
39k
3>9
39*
361
•ate per
ton -HI.
fcentcl
3.0 ey
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.5
l.k
1.7
1.9
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
l.k
l.k
l.k
1.3
1.5
l.k
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1-3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
i.o_ey
i.ojiy
-------
TABLE Ar 1. - Bituminous coal received at oven-coke plants in the United States, 1^69—Continued
Cven-«ke plar.r.
Great Laa«j Cartne Corp.
^.^
In tort
Ull«4 Ctolctl Cor».
totblebn StMl Coip.
Ohio
Anm St«l Carv.
Araeo StMl Corp.
Uuf.x :--.! 5^:
J* slan*. Ba^ ^f »oc. Coal Carp.
Ea3*.er« Alice. C:al Carp.
Z«f tern Aiaoe. Ccal r-rp.
!**r:al '•-.Ultr. Co.
Eaitern A$oc. roal Corp.
Eai-.em Ajtoc. Coal Corp.
Bo/ally Hteokelei* Coal
Iiland Creek C=al Co-
Buffalo =-a«V-3olvey U*. .
Alll*l Chemical Corp.
Seoet-Eilve} 31«. .
Allied Chemical Corp.
Seaml-Sclvey Civ.,
Allied Chemical Ccrp.
I aland Creek Coal Co.
Cllnchfleld Caal 5lv.,
Pit*. B tOK J".
Co.
Spruce Plrer Coal Co.
Carton Fuel Cj.
Lacaawtma Bethlehem Mine* Corp.
Bethlehem Wnei Corp.
Bethlehem Mine* Carp.
Bethlehem Kinei Corp.
Be\Mehe» nine* Carp.
Beth-Elkhorn Corp.
Bethlehea Mines Corp.
Bethlehen Wnes Corp.
CILnchfteLd (Coal Dl».
Of the Plttium Co.
A^i^rit Coal Co.
Plliaton Co.
Veittoreland Coal Co.
Aatierit Coal Co.
Cryital Block Coal Co.
Kent land -Elanom Coal
Corp.
ConaolldatlOD Coal Co.
Bam** & Tueter Co.
Consolidation Coal Co.
Bet It Coal Co.
ftaalltoa Arwco Steel Corp.
ATBKO Steel Carp.
Eastern Aiaoc. Coal Corp.
W.Ml«tOMQ Anpco BtMl Corp.
Arvco Steel Corp-
Caatern Atsoc. Coal Corp.
*•*!**
!U»c if «In«
•o. 3
Pt?pper«-.c^ Jto. 1
tape rial Ho. 7
Ke/»tOoe So. 1
Kopperiijn to. ?
Pr^nltr
Tralee
Eharjion ft-aoch
Hamood
So. 10
ffeai Vo. 2
Ho. 2
So. I
Spruce River
Carton fioa. 9.20,29
Bo. 31
Bo. 32
Ro. ',1
Bo. 56
S^. -O
Kendryv Bo. 22
Bo. Ill
Eunice
MM* Bo. 2
ABtient Bo. 1
Hampton Bo. 3
Lundale Bo. 1
Grapevine
Spruce Fork
Hu^calcjon
LaxtcaaMrv Ito. 2<*
Champion
ftelti
Bo. 7
totolo Hood
bjatoae Bo. 1
Bo. 7
ftobln Hood
Key flow Bo. 1
Sfclpplne poini
Jewell Valler
Copper • toe
Bumrel!
rii-
Kopperitor.
Premier
"rundy
Tralee
Capeli
Hamood
Enett
Cllnc-iflel-i
tee
Calnbrook
Jeffrey
Carbon
Baoty Clo
Rwloc
CU«M>rtb
Pfcrlanoa
CUavorth
Deane
Shamrock
Eunice
Cllschfleld
Aatteribdale
HaaptOD
Aatierctdale
El da
B1«4J
Hutcnlnaon
Stllei Croaalni
Champion
Calrnbrook
Wnteoal
tebln Hood
Key at^ne
ttonteoal
Jtobln Hood
Key* tone
Court?
Buchanan
Boon*
Kanaka
He Novell
McDowell
Buchanan
rtrCowell
fayeite
U>e*n
ft!t»el"
Boone
Kanawha
Carrie
Caatorla
Vashlo^ton
Waxhlogton
Maahinfflon
Utcner
Kanawha
Baleiffh
Ruaaell
1^.8"
Dlchlnson
Logan
Kloco
PUe
Weitvreland
; Cubrla
Allegheny
Sovercet
Balalgb
•OOM
HcDoMll
Boona
HcDtwell
ida* loc.ilan
Stale
Virginia
Wr»X Virginia
Vet*. vir«lala
West Virginia
Vesc Vlr^n-.t
wen Virginia
Wen Virginia
Weit Virst-:la
Virginia
Weat Vlr«inla
Ueit Virginia
We»l Virginia
Ueit Virginia
Virginia
PermavlvanJa
'4*»T. Vlr^tnli
wet Virginia
We«t Virgin a
Virginia
Ueat Virginia
Virginia
Weat Virginia
Veat Virginia
We*t Virginia
Kentucky
Prrniiylvarla
ftnntylvanla
ffennaylranla
Vest Vlrilnia
We t Vlrclnla
Ve t Virginia
V. t Virginia
He t Virginia
Ve t Virginia
p4£cla«
dirt MCI
7
7
A
7
a
7
a
7
7
7
8
a
7
a
i
5
8
1
1
2
2
2
9
3
B
6
8
3
a
9
2
1
2
1
B
6
7
6
a
7
rate
llatrlcx
itrglr.lan
Virginian
virrlr.lv.
Pocanontaa
Kanaw^a
Kanawha
Focahonta*
Tiller
ilZrw!"
Kaoaxtui
buuwha
Clearfleld
Clearrield
WettBDreland
Weitaoreland
dkhom
Kanawha
Kanavha
TlUer
Tlllrr
Clcarfleld
Clear field
Clear field
Clear ft eld
Kaaawha
aawtta
rocahontaa
Kanavha
tocahootaa
**•.-. a
rf
All-rail
All-rail
All-rat 1
All-rail
All-rail
Fall '-c Ha=p-.»
F-.«,!i, Va. y
All-ra'.l
All-rail
All-rail
AU-rall
Al 1 - ra 1 1
All-rail
All -rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-ral
All-ral
All-ral
All-ral
All-ral
All-ral
All-ral
All-rail
All -rail
All- rail
All - ra f 1
All-rail
All -rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
all-rat]
All -rail
All-rail
All-rail
AU-ratl
All-rail
All-nil
' TU'-.e
P*'
wsn
'..75
5'""
6.-C2
6.37
6.37
t'.yi
^
=> •"
o!j7
6.37
5-0*.
U.7D
t-,70
".TO
6.3?
fc.37
^-73
6.37
5-10
^..10
5.10
5.25
5. Oh
5-(*
6/1* Ot
S/h.06
VSA
fc/i«.0b
S/b.06
s.^fc
Trw.por-.al ion Cbari
Apt>ll»tl=B
«),OOO ura-tralnload
SO* „-,„*,.-
_,
do
5,CX>3 ton-'.ralnload
5,000 tcn-lralrdoad
5, TOO too-traltOoad
5!So ton-tralnload
^
s oc-i too xrainload
5,000 ton-tralnlcad
5,(XO ton-traljilMd
5.0CO ton-tralnload
5.QOO Loa-trainload
7.00O ton-tralnload ^/
7,OOO ton-iralnload 5/
7,ouo ton-tralnload J/
5,OOO toa'tralnload
5,OOO ton-.tralnload
Single-car
5.OOO tOD'lratnload
5,000 ton-tralnload
5 pen ran tralnload
5.OOO too- tralnload
"
5.0OO ton-tralnload
S^OOO ton-tratnload
5! COO ton-traloloed
5.JOO U>n-tralnload
'/.SCO u»-tr.irvlo*d
5.0OO too-tralnload
5,000 toD-tralnlomd
5.000 ton-tr»lnlo«d
5.0CD toD-tralnloaJl
5,000 ton-tralnlomd
c««
Kile***
606
61B -
613
580
372
UlU
U70
5W
587
U56
5feO
617
579
2W
503
500
217
217
276
276
276
590
500
501
617
5*0
5ft7
5
-------
TABLE A-1. • Bituminous coot received at oven-coke plants in the United Stutes, 1969—Continued
Local 1 .xi CaaJ pure
Owo-c'^a &laat of plant **!*• af ecavar.i
Ohio fc=e>* t£=*?)
ITS. Steel Ccrp. Loral- i;.B. Steal Ccrp.
U.S. Steel Corp.
U.S. Steel Carp.
lalaarl Creek Coal Co.
Uland Creek Coai Co.
U.S. Steel Corp.
Lretovn Coal Co.
Leelown Caal Co.
:*-,rol-. Steel Corp. Kr'.cs*..:'. winding Tulf Coala. Inc.
Wincing OUT Coala. Inc.
Winding XI f Coala, Inc.
Crystal Block Coal *
Co«e Co
C.-ok Ala Coal Carp.
Dlaoord Shaeroek Corp. Falni/l 11* lalam Creek CoaJ Co.
Karaan Walng Corp.
Sl*b Fork Coal Co.
Taur-iitown Sheet * Tite Ca. Campcell Euckeya Coal Co.
•taible* Coal Co.
01{a Coal Co.
Eaa:ern Aaaoc. Coal Corp
Woodruff Coal Co.
Hepuolic Steel Torp. Clevelar/J Itland Creek Coal Co.
SepuMU 3tee Corp,
Republic Stee Corp.
Ftpubllc Stee Corp.
Beatrice Focanontaa Co.
Veamreland oal Co.
Republic Stee Corp.
Republic Steel Corp. t%u«Uloi. Republic Steel Corp.
Republic Steel Corp.
winding Oulf Coala, Inc.
Republic Steel Corp. Uarren Republic Steel Corp.
Republic Steel Corp.
Republic Steel Corp.
Beatrice Pocshoata* Co.
Republic Steel Corp. ^oun^Jlown Republic Steel Corp.
Slab Pork Coal Co.
Wincing Gulf Coala. Inc.
Allied Cbflalcal Corp. I root on Se»*t-Gol*»y Dli.
Seaet-5ol*ay Olv. Irmrt "Tnlirsj Dlv.
Seawt-SolTay Dlr.
UlAOd Creek Coal Co.
leckle Smnkeleaa Coal Co
Carton Fuel Co.
Intel-lake Steel Corp. Toledo Ole* Coal Co.
Davla CoaJ Co.. lac.
Island Creek Coal Co.
Pemsjlganta
rtttsDnrgS Steal Co. Nmssen Urd Coal Co.
Consolidation Coal Co.
Gateway Coal Co.
Consolidation Coal Co.
hasea
IMB -f aiaa
jary PJo. lU
Gary +i- 7
--try Ba. 10
•o. 27
Bo. 1C
Roa. 7 1 £>
Le^tova
Poplar Creca
«%eAlpln«
Ta=»
7to. » B
Kamn
Sl.i 7orm
•emcolln
tithlea
OLaa
Kopperaton Ha. 1
Bane
FtoHen
Ef;»«ellwo
!fevfleld
No. L
Seatrlce
Haxpton !to. i
Republic
RuaaeUtaa
Van *ter
no. fc
P'aaaellton
Clyde
Beatrice
•o. !•
Cljrt*
Slab Pork
Tamj
Kamood
Tralee
Shannon Branch
to. 93
Anjean Bo. 5
Bo. 2O
01 g»
•o. l
Spur lock
Bird no. 3
Ftutchlaaoa
Nevhall
CtiJ.pitlA f>\Dt
(amaon
Ullcae
Wltcoc
H-.l l-n
Lvncr.
"rail.
:r.r...
EAI- .11
rtta
r^»l Hiur.ialr.
!lar^a/>
rial F^r.
Nemcoltn
Courtne/
Suaanna
Rapper fc wn
M 1 V nf
Ho lien
RuaieLltoa
Verona
Van feter
Grundy
Rajqiton
lau-rovbone
fkia teuton
Van Iteter
Eaat Gulf
Van Meter
Ruatellton
PrederlcktAm
Crumb
Van ffeter
8Ub Pork
Taw
Harmood
Tralee
Cape la
CoaJ tountaln
Vatta
601 th Carbon
Buaaona
Karmlt
8*11 •bury
J0te«0«
tkitcblnaon
Clark rrl lie
CdKt}
tDowell
urtMell
-1cr*»ell
Uvmn
Karlan
a^chanan
9i.chanan
2!:;s
TUlelgh
Klneo
Buchanan
Paleigh
-.reene
Washington
HrEcrwvll
WiTcln^
Pike
Logan
Allegheny
Alle^.eny
Weit^relard
Buchanan
Boone
Pike
Allegheny
MCI too re land
RaleleM
Veataoreland
Allegheny
Washington
Buchaoaa
We.tnrelaod
Ral^lCh100
Raleigh
Fajette
Wyoming
ffcOcwell
Hyoni.«*
Creeflbirier
Ueavha
HcDoMll
HlneP
noyd
So.ra.1
Meaimwreland
Graene
MrDovell
IQiM location
Coal
Sta,\« dlnrtct
Heat Virginia 7
Heat Virginia 7
Heat Virginia 7
Ueat Virginia 3
Kentucky" ~* 9
Virginia S
Virginia 6
Ueat Vlrelr.la 7
Vea*. Virginia ""
Weat Virginia 9
Veat Virginia 6
Virginia S
«eat Virginia 7
Penaaylrtnla 2
Pennsylvania 2
Weat Virginia 7
Veat Virginia 7
Kentucky 8
Vert Virginia 6
Ftensylvanla. 2
fonosylTaala 2
Pcnjify l»an la 2
Virginia 7
Ueat Virginia 8
Kentucky 8
Pennsylvania 2
ftmmylTanl 2
Veat virgin a 7
Pvnnsylvmnl 2
Penntylvanl 2
Pranaylvanl 2
Vlrelala 7
PenosTlvanla 2
Ueat Virginia 7
Veat Virginia 7
tfeat Virginia ft
Veat Virginia 7
Ueat Virginia 7
Ueat Virginia 7
Ueat Virginia 7
Ueat Virginia 8
Vest Virginia 7
Vest Virginia 6
Kar^cky 6
Rrmolwa. 1
Pcmiylvanla 2
PatnarlnaU 2
Ueat Virginia 7
FrelgSi
rate
dla'.rlci
Rxa/>. jf.tai
Paea/ ,r.-.a»
Rjcahin'ti
l**;an
Harlan
T>iark.er
Ti.acker '
V* f.>«r
Tracker
TT: acker
Thacker
Rev River
(doodlfce
Ueataorelani
tocahontaa
Virginian
Kentucky
Logan
Plttabur^i
PIttiburgr.
Wettaoreland
L'pper Buchanan
Kanawh^
Kentucky
PUtsburefc
Ueatajreland
Hew River
Ueaimoreland
Pittsburgh
Westsnrclsnd
Upper But^anw
Veitrureland
Ue a too re land
Hew River
Virginian
Lagan
Virginian
tee anon tas
Virginian
Creenbrler
Ucswha
focahcntaa
Tbacker
Big Sandy
Boaseraet
VeaUKxreLmnd
Klondike
rbeanontas
af
«^«e^rT)t
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-ra 1
All-ra 1
All-re I
All-ra 1
All-ra 1
rall-tar/eTall
«L!T' ""
All -rail
All-rail
Ga.r«e-rall-barge
Barq«-rall-baree
All-ntll
All-rail
All-rail
JO] -rail
Ul-rall
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
AU-rall
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All-rail
All -rail
All-rail
All -rail
R»l 1 -barge -ra 1
Ball-barge-r* 1
Rail -barge- ra 1
Rall-barge-ra 1
ftall-barge-ra 1
Rail -Urge -ra 1
All-rail
All-rail
AU-r.ll
Rall-barge-rall
Truck
Rail-bar ge-rall
Bate
ten
5.56
?*5*
5. y*
•5,2*1
}.2«.
!,?*•
5.2-
2.1*-
1.77
5.2-
5.cl
VS
.62
.itl
5.51.
5*5^
5.2*
5.26
U.lili
Ji.liU
L lib
5!^
5.2U
5.M
t, i(2
5.5k
3.50
I'.fa
3.50
3.62
5.51-
5.5^
1.97
2.10
2.10
1.97
2.10
2.10
5.5<>
5.2i
5.2k
l.W
2.00
Trvnvrortctlnn chvf*
AjvVlcallan V
i.OOO t^n-lnlnlcw-l
5,OOO tot-tr«lDlo«J
5,DOU t3D-tnlolcaj
5,000 tea- 1 r«l nlo* 1
5,000 lsn-vr%lolc»'.
^,.OO Lon-irml.il ^*d
3.DOO ton-:r*:r.loal
Eavrite !. 0-1-5 cer.ls ^
BarEe fcj-i.' --MH V''
5,000 ton-tralnloaJ
SlfLgle-car
5.OOO ton-tralnload
Rail 1.11 7/
Rail 1.31 T/
5.0OO ton-iVa!nlae.d
5,000 ton-tralnload
5.00O wn-;ralnload
5,000 ton-tralnload
5,000 ton-tralnload
5,000 tnn-traloload
5,000 ton -train load
5.0OO ton-tralnload
5,000 ton-tralnload
5,000 uui-traknloed
5.OOO ton-t ralnload
Single -car
5,000 ton-traLnload
5.OOO ton-tralnload
5,000 U)n-tralnload
5.0OO too-tralnload
5,OOO ton-tralnload
5,000 ton-tralnload
5.0OO um-tralnlaad
5,000 ton-tralnload
Barge Uo-50 cecta I/
Barge 1O-5O cents I/
Barge bO-50 centa I/
Barge <«O-50 ceota I/
Barge bO-50 centa I/'
Barge UO-5O centa y
5.000 too-tralnload
5,000 toa-tralnload
5,OOO ton-tr»lnload
Bare* *° cents per ton
Appro*. 30 cents per ton
Appro*, ho cents per ton
Barge 60 centa I/
•
I*a4«
-'. .
- 1
- 1
Jt-S
5*.
3.*i
3?1
;;•;
„
L21
t^i
-06
11 .
-2'
fc.^
•50
3C*
131
131
135
391
376
T>3
101
15*
326
119
65
11?
k!3
119
381
381
58
H9
139
139
133
75
',*
3k9
377
65
35
60
139 • 267
B>» p./
(c«et*)
l.k
l.k
l.k
l.fc
l.k
1.0
1.3
1.3
l.k
l.k
2.0
2.0
1.2
1.3
l.k
1.1
2.0JI/
1-3
I-1*
1.2
1.*
3-*
3.'
2.k
l.k
1.9
l.k
HA
Z.9
1.7
2.9
5-2
3-2
1-3
2-9
3-0
1.5
1-5
3.k
l.k
1.5
l.k
1.6
2.6
l.k
1.5
l.k
1.68/
.r^
i.k
-------
TABLE A-1. - Bituminous cool received at oven-coke plants in the United States, 1969—Continued
Local! or. Coal purct
rtgsrlv«ci« fcoBtLnaed)
Bucst-e C sal Co.
ConK.li-laM.or. Coal Ca.
Aatvurit Ccai Co.
viadle^ Yilf Coal Ca.
Slab F-rt C^al C&.
Eastern *4i3c. Coal Corp.
Eastern ACKTC. Coal Corp.
•J.3. S'.eel Corp. Clf.rlor. 'J.5. Cieel Corp.
".;. ritel Corp.
".Z. S'eel Corp.
".'.;. ,'-i eel C*rp.
V.E Steel Ccrp.
•J.E. Cteel Ccrp.
V.S. S-.eel Corp.
'...S. C'.eel Corp.
Buffalo KIr.in« Co.
UctXanrelan* Coal Co,
ABhent Coal Co.
Aer,er>t Coal Co.
U.S. Steel Carp. Fslrlesi Aaherf. Coal Co.
Adieni Coal Co.
Cllortfield Coal. Div.
flttsun Co.
U.S. S-_M! Corp.
^iley Ccal h Coke Co.
Alan Mood fct.«*l Co. Svedeland Consolidation Coal Co.
Consolidation Coal Co.
Bird Coal Co.
Cryital Bloc* Coal Co.
Kcntland-CUaorn Coal
Corp.
BelU Coal Co.
B*thlen« Mnei Corp.
Brthlebe* Steal Corp. Betalcfaes Betblehea Kloe* Corp.
Bethlche* Klnes Corp.
Bethlehesi Mines Corp.
Bethlehea Klnes Corp.
Gauley Coal & Coke Co-
fathlchot Si«*l Corp. Johnstown &*thl*ht» Hnea Corp.
Betnleh** Hnea Corp.
Bethl«na» Woe* Corp.
Bethlehe» Mloei Corp.
Bethlan** Mines Corp.
Eastern Ou 4 Fuel As»oc. Philadelphia Eastern Assoc. Coal Corp.
Eastern Assoc. Coal Corp.
Eastern Aasoc. Coal Corp.
Joaei 4 Ltucnlln Allqulppa Jooe* 4 Laughlln 3te*l
Corp-
Jon** 4 Uugnlla 8ta«l
Corp.
Jatmt 4 iJMgfcHn Sta*l
Corp.
Consolidation Coal Co.
Conaolldat Inn Coal Co.
Itolted Pocahontas Coal Co
Buffalo Unlng Co.
Ranger Pual Corp.
«•*•
SSI..
H-jtct.lnion
Urdale Ho. 1
Eas*. "lilf
Slab fort
Keystone Ha. 1
Uiurun »i. 2
.tbena
ffcple Cre«h
r.wy No. 1
^ry BO. 2
-.ary !to. ?
:*ry Ito. 1J
Cary Bo. 1J*
Gary Bo. 17
Lorado
Haaptoa Bo. 3
McGregor
Aotiurit Ho, li
Lundale Ho, 1
Aorterii Ho. k
m*» BO, 2
Car? Bo. H.
Doncgan Bo. 10
Lyneo
Buckeye
Bird Ho. 2
Grapevine Ho. 3
Spruce Fork
Farltz Ho. It
Ho. 51
Santy do Oo. 31
Rerloc Bo. 32
C«trU Slope Bo. 33
Ida»ay Bo. U>
Tloga Bo. 1
CUr-orth Ho. 51
Ihricnna Bo. 56
Goaeraet Ho. 60
BOB. 31, 32
Bo. kl
Keyetone Ho. 2
Wharton Ho'. 2
XopperatDn Bo. 2
Oianncpln
Vvat* Bo, H
Vast* Bo. 5
Crane Cr*e*
Turk«y Gap
Indian Ridge Bo. 6
Lorado
Barrett
Ctarkir'U-
ita.icr . U-T.
Aarer.i&le
la*i 4OT
31 at F^rk
lt>y»-,-,t.«
lOiai* T.
ralar.l
Ne> Creek
Vllroe
'^11 es*
Filter1.
Vllcoe
Gary
Gary
Aatierttdale
AiTier*td«le
Cllnctifleld
Mmioo
Doce^an So. 10
Uynco
Stephenxofl
J4\mtovn
Elda
Rwlpa
Clalrnbrooh
til worth
Santy Glo
Revloc
Ebenaburg
Idaoay
Tloga
EUnortb
mrlanna
OAcburg
Etoerntmrg
BarrackviUe,
H*rndon
Wharton
(topper* too
RUand
Labella
Laballa
NcCoBW
ayrlngton
Crua^a.r
Lorado
Barrett
^reao.
Ve»tKir*laad
Lc^ar.
Fatlet ^i
(*•!•• «ll
SOTTl*
•,re«ne
Washington
Hclowell
•fclowell
HctxweU
(t [owe LI
*Slu
lasna
lagfn
Ul^n
logui
Loeu.
RuuU
NcDomll
«l«ol«.
HyoUng
&^KT*«t
Mngo
Pike
Soaeraet
Wkahlngton
Caafcrla
Caatrla
Caabr! a
r*U^or
Hlcnolji
«aahln«jton
Uaahington
V»>MnctTff>
Cawtrl.
Ibrlon
Uyccdng
Boon*
l*TcaUng
Cr«*ae
Uublngtoo
Vamhlngloo
Ihrccr
He Dow* 11
Boon*
Kne location
Cot
profc
ta.,1^.
Vastly Vnni a
yert Virginia
Meat Virginia
Meet Virginia
W«et Virginia
«e«t Virginia
Pennsylvania
Penniylvaala
We»t Virginia
Ueft Virginia
Weti Virginia
We«t Virginia
Welt Virginia
Uett Virginia
ue*t Virginia
tfe*t Virginia
«*»! Virginia
Uett Virginia
tfert Vtr«LaU
West Virginia
West Virginia
Virginia
Ue*t Virginia
Vest Virginia
Vest Virginia
Vest Virginia
Pwfflsylwviiti
Vast Virginia
lejrtucky
Pennjylvanla
Pamsylvanla
PmuylTUl*
Pennsylvania
hntuylvanle
West Virginia
West Virginia
Pennsylvania
Pmnsylrmnla
PtnotylYania
P»iw*yl*anla
Vest Virginia
West Virginia
West Virginia
West Virginia
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
West Virginia
tfeat virgltiU
West VlrglnU
Uest Virginia
West VlrftnU
a FrelrfV.
clog rate
nt.au*.
UeaiamelAM
Logan
Hew Rifer
Virginian
Poctncn'-aa
Kanavha
Kbarg*-rall
Bail-bar t«- rail
f»U 1-barge -rail
•Vte
1.66
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.66
2,00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.OO
2.00
1.66
1.66
1.66
1.66
6.60
6.30
6.80
6.1.7
5.51
6.U7
6>7
5,29
5.60
6.76
5.23
5.23
5.23
5.51
3.25
3.25
3.25
HA
3.59
6. Si
7.16
7.16
2.16
2.16
2.16
1.66
1.66
Transport.^ -har««
.-—do
._dQ_— -
Bare* *O-5O cents per ion
Barge *Q~5O cents per ton
fferg* bO-5-7 cvcts per Van
Barg* »O-5O cents per ton
Barg* to- 5O ;rat» per tor
ApprOJi. "JO ,-«.-.tA ?er tec
do
Barg* 60 cer.ts per toa I/
Barg* 60 cents per *.oa 1
Barg* 60 cents per ton I/
Barg* 6O cents per too \J
J»r§* 6O cents per ton T/
terg* 60 cests per too I/
Pargt 6O ctnu per ton \J
Earg* 60 cent* per ton I/
Barge 60 cent* per t/m T/
Barge 6O cents per ton I/
Barg* 60 cents per ton i/
5.0OO too-trainload
5.000 tAn-traJnLoad
5.OOO tOD'trainload
5. OOO ton-tnlnLoad
5.00O ton-tninlo*d
5 .OOO toD'tralnload
5. OOO ton-tnlnload
5. OOO too-tralnload
5.000 ton-tnloload
5. OOO ton-trainload
5. OOO ton-tralnload
5,000 ton-tninload
5,000 ton-tnlnload
5,000 ton-tnlnload
5.OOO ton-tralnload
7.000 ton-tralnload
7, OOO ton-tnlnload
7.000 ton-tr%inload
5.000 ton-trmlnlMd
5,000 ton-tnlnload
Single-car
Single-car
Single-car
Apprm. 55 cents per too
Jtppra. 65 cents par ton
Appro*. 65 cant* par ton
Bmrg*-55 cents per ton I/
Baree-5? ecota par ton, \f
Barc*-55 cants par tot T/
Barge-tt cents per ton T/
Barge- 55 cents per ton y
,
to
bO
I/ W
I/ W
r/ w
T- w
Kj to
35
35
139 -
139 -
139 •
139 -
139 *
106 -
206 •
106 .
106 *
565
565
636
52"-
560
5*5
i*9>i
25*
552
590
252
355
2fil
261
359
U8l
102
102
102
1*1
1*91
537
536
35
35
15
171
in
in
106
267
267
2fcl
267
267
267
267
267
267
267
267
267
267
267
267
ton-ad 1»
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1-7
1.7
l.b
l.k
l.k
1 .*
.A
l.k
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
l.O
1.2
1-3
2.1
1.0
1.1
*A
RA
1.9
1.9
j.U
1.5
1.1
3-2
3-2
3-2
V
2.5
l.k
1-3
1.3
1.6
i.a
.'a
.6
.7
.7
-------
TABLE A- U • Bituminous cool received at oven-coke plont i in the United Stores. 1969-Cont inued
•_• -\' .".
rtyiylvaftia cart Low*'! !
-r -'-le IK w-a"
7*nneiiee
Ar»:5 S'.eel Ccrp. H— »'.3.i
V.ar,
1 . n. Steel Corp. :er.ev»
We it Virginia
Wheeling Pittsburgh E*s'
Steel Corp. Ste-jbenvllle
Sharon Steel Crop. Fairmont
National Steel Corp. Welnon
Wisconsin
MllwuLee Solvajr Coke
Mv., Plckand* Mather ttlwiukce
2/ Includes dusking of coal Into barges.
I/ To* contract charge Car barging coal
CV Cbarn for iTiMilns coal Into vessels
J:nes i LaL«*U& £l*el
"t.rp-
Jooes i Lt^rrJln Etcel
Ccrp.
Carp.
tiit-lllai'.-ii. "^al "i.
fr.ffal-» WRlM V,.
Iilar.l Tre** '.«1 "-,.
:ilar.J -r**« -5*1 .).
::r.«-113a-'.;r; T^al Co.
Arscc Eteel Ccrp.
*'r.tt*d F9Ctr-.ani.at Toal Co
Evans Coal d.
Fettody "oal Co.
'jarlarvi Ca*l Cv,-
Kii-rar.-. Irer,- C-.al
and Coke Co.
•;.£. Steel Corp.
•rf.S. Steel Corp.
Varaar Coal C^.
Artec Saokelest Coal Co.
Eastern Assoc. Coal Corp.
KUenefcan hxrar.onlas
Coal Mining Co.
Oamr Mining Corp-
Al*a Coal Corp.
Eastern Assoc. Coal Corp.
Eastern As«oc. Coal Corp.
Joanne Coal Co.
Rational Woes Corp.
MBthles Coal To.
Itawnn Coal Co.
Jewell B13«* Coal Corp.
Amtierst Coal Co.
Uilted Pocahontas C"al Co
Island Creek Coal Co.
Imperial Ellhom Coal Co.
batland-EUhorn Coal
Corp.
Cannelton Coal Co.
Cannelton Coal Co.
to Sparrows Point la approi
a«t
_
Eraf£^t,7. «
Vesla Ho. _ i+LtUr
•,ti-* So. U:eUe
I™/^t* r^r?r^cr
1>:.'»4.- [>3r»ls
•\relr..-". Prlct
^' ^r.^,,..,. tiii^
»,cxe/e :-e;*ena*.
Rotir. r'lod Ssoln 4coi
Indian t;j.^ KC. 5 Croupier
Evar.i Bokasr.l
P-;rerc ~:-i.:. Clarvacre
~arlar.1 ?'.l?ler
^Ji:r Creek Carbon-lale
;«r.ev* Hor«e 'mr.yar.
Soeeriet Sonercet
Hara«r KarcarvUle
Wyco Wycc
l*Jor Flknorn Kite
Colver Colver
Kltchekan •%«• Wll»
Caar ^.^ * CoJ""*1*
AIM PlkevlLle
Keystone no. 1 Keystone
Keystone Ho. 1 Vivian
Joanne Rachel
Isabella Isabella
Msthlet Courtney
Itsann Itavno
Ho. J Seng Ca^
Lundale Bo. 1 Aarierstdale
Indian Ridge No. 6 Cruaqiler
Beatrice Cruody
Calora Ua^o
Spruce Fora t\tR*
Bo. 8 CanoclLon
Bo. 3 Superior
laatelj 22-2^ cents per too.
-
• aiMo^l-x)
WaA-Mt^^t;
Mercer
Mercer
Li- van
lo.-mr.
Vf^F.1
Ecane
ttTowell
Kaskell
Bop-ri
hieh-11
Fit ken
E*er-.
linnlson
Allegheny
Wyoadn«
L*tcher
Canbrla
Mercer
lAfian
Pike
Ktowell
McDowell
Marlon
Fayette
wsshlngton
WyoaUng
Buchanan
U>^a
Buchaoan
FloyO
Pile
Fayette
McDowell
State
feus- IvarJa
MS,
Pennsylvacta
recRtylw.is
•>••. Vlr^inl*
r-r *.-. .* ^
V.r.-Lf.la
.ir.Lnla
Wei-. /Ir.-in'.a
¥*i- Virginia
i,'e;t Vlrfl.-.la
:kl anoxia
:hlshJ^"
^lanoea
ColoraJo
'.tar
Cdora*>
Pennsylvania
West .'Ir^inla
Ker.t'jcky
Pennsylvania
We»t Virginia
Weat Virginia
Kentucky
West Virginia
U«st Virginia
West Virginia
Pennsvlvinla
Pennsylvania
West Virginia
Virginia
West Virginia
Vast Virginia
Virginia
Kantucky
KeotucVr
West Virginia
West Virginia
,«!U
2
2
?
]
-
1
L
C
"•
1-
15
I".
16
X
16
2
7
8
1
7
Q
8
8
7
7
3
2
2
7
7
8
7
7
8
8
a
7
::-
QJttltk*
Wes*.a»rclat:-i
Wef_ar:r*Lfc£i
S^Biii
t:^ Tw.i,
Uti^ 3t.er.nv
.•llr.cR V.ll.y S3. ?
Vlrilnl.n
temt.
Foe a.11 -~r*«:
f.i?Ur
Vrtten' Arrow
^-.Isler
Carbon lale
Itoery
Crested Butte
Plttsbir^i
Virginian
Clearf'.eia
Faca.ijnt.as
Logan
Ttiscker
Pocahontas
Pocahontas
FalrannL
Pittsburgh
rlttsbur^t
Virginian
Buchanan
Lo«an
Pocahontas
Bucbanan
Big Sandy
Thacker
ICanaMia
Pocahontas
^
All-r'.^er
All-river
Ul-rlv*r
fa:i-l*"r€*"r"'-
Rall-iuye-r.'.J
All-nil
All-ra.l
aaU-tarfe-r*!!
p*l l-bkr.e-r«ll
Ul-r.U
Al-1-r.ll
;j.i-..u
AIl-r.ll
Ul-r.ll
Ul-r.ll
Bwa*-All«eher.y P
Rall-su-je-nil
P.U-car ge-rall
ft.ll-tu-£e-rall
bll-bufe-ntl
P»l l-t.r£e-r.ll
R«ll-bu-^-r.tl
IKll-bu-^-nll
Ul-r.ll
Ul-rvll
All-ri.er
Ul-rlvcr
fcll-bu-g«l/r.ll
Ml-t«rgel/r»ll
lUl-Uke y R.I1
R^l-Ukc It/ B.11
tall-Ukc V Mil
Itell-L^e V B.11
H.I !-!»», k/ R.11
J.¥.
2. 1'.
2. L-:
2.3?
•. = 1
'•'"
1. ^
8.1'
'•' '
•>.---•
5.3=
;.76
2.06
3.*.
ver
2.00
1.66
1.38
2.00
1.66
1.66
1.66
2.00
3.68
.58
.69
.69
S.oo
2.00
*t-13
''»
l'.13
k.13
k.33
Appra , ceots per tea
Jppm. ti ?ect« xr too 3^
Arprc>. €5 cents per :-n ;-5
5ar.-e-ci cents per tar, !_' ^-.7
a^«-56 c«a,. „, -.» , --,
Elr^le-car ?i^
£ln?le-car J^2
9arae-3.2O 1' i.*3--
Barfe-3.2^ T 1.11
HlniBUi 3f 1,000 tonj -rs
Single-car 317
E!r.£le-car 2^1
..oluae.mnlEUa 6 ^
tor.i per week 571
Tral.iload-Hlr.liUB 3,100 tea l^J
Train! oad
do 3/t
56 centa per ton 1*0
Barge-Aptroi. (1.O5 per ton <<16
do il*0
do- 106 • 217
do 106 * 217
—-do 106 • 217
- railroad car—23 cents per ton.
§/ Appro*, rail dlttancea and rm.ll rate.
ROTE: Railroad ratis Include Ex P*rte 26?A freight rate locreue wblch becaw effective
-------
56
TABLE A-2. • Transportation cost characteristics of biturninoui coal shipped to ««l«ct«d coniumanl/
To
AUby
C*u[?£U
Urn, tMet.
Cis§ij£t
Dvvon
H*rtfort
K& Ml •torn
ItetvlU*
P«v Kavta
DDTVT
nuiboro
WllJUMto.
Dlfltrlet flf ColiMll
•MlM. D.C.
fl>Hh|Bt
Atlnt*
tUrlM
Jumc
Wteh.ll
MU«4«r*lll«
tart VntMtth
IUU01I
TMUffl
Jolut
Jvft*
Nklfl
rift t MI
tocftford
V«nlr*
lB4J*m
fcJIytowi
Ci^tolli
Cntarton
Duwi
t. CMc>«p
CdWKfijfort
rurttt*
OMT
Mi»ni1
lodlM* Htrbor
Lett*
Ntvritoure
tortvr
8t. Joirpti
Orliln point
or dlitrlct 7/
Cordorm, A.'«.
rarUh, AU,
Doothton. Ala.
Tgrt C«ayon. R.H.
Sunnyildi, Utah
8«QByild«, UUh
ciMrri«i.
Allm. Vt.
Am, T*m.
Uwli. If.
AJw, Ky.
Arco, T«m.
FUrlu Dlit.
Un**n» Dlit.
Ftrey. 111.
Pirey, IU.
ftntww
hUrtil* Dlit.
Cmtrvl Illlnoli
TtyloprlU*, 111.
Cut too
nrcy. IU.
rruUln-wmivum
Dlit. (111.)
BtUnlU* Dlit. (IU
PulUa. Co., Ml.
torcy. IU.
C*rUft«Tlll«, 111.
rrwkuri. IU.
toOMvlU*. Ind.
Smdkorn, Ind.
01. t. (Ind.)
MMborn. lad.
Vtaslo«, lad.
9prlBffl«ld. 111.
Swtflborn, Ind.
Llaton-9ulllwi
Dlit. (Ind.)
ACM. V. v«.
8Md F»Uh. Pa.
Lynch, Ky.
•oonvnil*. Ind.
C*to, Ind.
Souutm lUlnoli
C*Uup, Mw Mnlco
BoofM*lll». lod.
5*.i.r. 111.
Prtnc«un Dlit. (In«.l
Bwidbort). tnd.
Cllnton-Brull pl.t.
Dufcfr, Ind.
LynnvtUf Mia*. Ind.
Prlnc«ion-AyiMr* Dlvt
Clinton. Brull
P>lnc*ton-Ay«hlr«
Mn. train-
iMd «n. wtmwl
tonM^r*! tonnua
k.OOO
b.OOO
k.OOO
b.OOO
9.000
6.000
7.000
1.600
2.500
7.600
},200
ft. 100
6,000
5.600
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
5.000
7,000
9,000
9,000
10.000
7,000
2,500
10,000
7,000
7,000
5.000
10,000
10,000
9.OOO
5.100
5,kOO
b.OOO
7.000
1.000
7.000
5.000
) 10,000
9,000
10,000
10,000
5,000
6,700
9.000
k.500
10.000
10,000
6.000
I.. TO
10.000
10,000
10,000
1,000
7.900
l.kOO
5,900
6.600
7.000
7.700
7,800
7,200
7.700
5.000
10,000
10.000
10,000
9.000
10.000
12.900
k.OOO
b.OOO
1,000
1.000
7.900
h.OOO
10.000
10.000
7,000
Ut. 900,000
fl.rt 500,000
»«rt 500,030
KXCMI
l.kOO.OOO
1,700,000
8. 000.000
U75.000
760.000
099 ,OOO
950.000
900,000
TOO, 000
bcm
700,000
1,500,000
500,000
l.bOO.OOO
i.wn.ooo
525.000
775.000
1,000,000
1,000.000
1.300.000
3. yn.OOO
900.000
1,600,000
Uoo.OOO
1,000,000
700,000
2.y».ooo
2,000,000
1.000,000
700,000
1.500.000
1.500.000
1,900.000
500.000
na.ooo
,300,000
.900,000
.000,000
.950.000
.800,000
.000,000
1,500.000
700,000
700,000
250,000
2V),000
2,250,000
1,000,000
ht* ptr too
U C«t«
a
90
Uk
U9
106
91
89
86
79k
689
570
586
k91
590
537
koB
Ul
'J9
50k
627
39^
by)
k96
k06
k39
'56
k61
k90
k6l
k90
%
<*7
bOO
k?9
k64
536
329
hj7
356
212
202
205
"3
^50
239
31*0
653
73
120
700
163
105
101
IkO
98
UO
170
UJ
139
193
%
32k
23»
903
ko
b7
59
178
35'
289
99k
2k7
as
15k
10k
91
88
86
81
79
570
595
570
601
903
283
l.LiO
166
189
2k7
9oe
206
68
51
903
385
HO
128
198
128
ue
135
135
135
68
68
68
U
1,100
1.100
1.100
1,373
1.3k9
'30
60k
715
501
608
6*5
'71
6k5
756
351
613
351
509
613
399
'57
352
977
'13
525
995
368
'79
316
980
'32
385
kkg
kk2
367
665
'58
312
975
60k
85
300
1.900
238
61
61
75
308
UO
8J.
936
Ski
150
26k
360
360
70
29
22
29
100
170
915
215
915
2k
3»
38
58
38
38
38
38
508
595
599
598
282
278
320
l.kM
289
978
199
150
90
90
35
96
970
209
985
tot. p«r
urn »!!•
In c«nti
1.195
1.018
.875
.703
.919
.881
.BJT
1.559
1.3*
1.309
1.265
.729
.610
.518
•398
.'}k
I.lk9
.861
.751
.8lk
.725
.86k
.681
1.180
.905
.899
1.13k
.875
1.157
.875
.7k5
1.'39
1.079
1.310
1.036
1.578
1.136
.9=*
1.356
1.166
.969
1.6*
1.175
1.012
•995
.kSO
tfr
.666
1.000
•753
1.236
1.081
.059
.689
1.721
1.656
1.667
• 552
1.6)9
.818
.677
1.907
1.277
.650
• 56k
2.671
1.618
9.136
S.6&
1.780
2.083
1.312
1.367
I.lk9
3-667
k.053
2.737
2.395
2.116
7.263
2.137
2.079
1.127
l.OCU
• 993
1.CO9
.720
.730
.60k
-75k
.57k
.660
1.21k
1.6k7
2.311
2.311
1.969
• 712
1.6k?
l-kJ9
RR Of
•hlppvr Twiff
ownrt rvfarori
im 63A
SOU 361
SOU 760
ATtr isiki-t
KTI? X94>ia
ATRT 154kl-l
ORW 7909-1
WW7919-*
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-1U
ICC 0-11)
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC O-113
ICC 0-U3
ICC 0-U3
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-1IJ
ICC O-lU
ICC 0-UJ
ICC 0-113
ICC O-11J
.ICC 0-LU
ICC 0-113
ICC C-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-111
ICC O-U3
ICC 0-113
n sm 970-1
ICC «-757
n
Rt tm 1123
8hlpp*r SOD 270-*
Shlpfn-
RR tm 91k-B
RR
RR
RR B7TB 997-*
ICC S-T59
RR
Bilppir ON t 0 3&96-0
Btlppvr
M
RR C 4 11 10k
RR C * Kl 10k
Shlpptr
•Mjip*r OM t 0 3893-1
RR
nt
RR C 4 W ITltiO-l
CO^MJ ON t 0 1997 -C
Co^taj
SOU 211
RR L 4 I «7fl
•ilpptr L 4 t XT8
or L 4 • 5016
co^any L k • 507*
RR L 4 1 JCTfl
RR
RR 1C 33kT-C
ra ic 13*7-4:
Btlppar 1C 33k7-C
n« iviva
nt cmrrr ifl5?o-c
RR Ovm> 10390-C
RM CNrrrr i859o-c
RR uMIPf 10992~T
M OBTTf 10592-T
RR CMm lfl)?J-*
M C 4 0 3066-1
RR 140 C-196-A
RR ITTB 966-*
RR
n
RR
Oilppcr or AT 4 IT 13S3(M
RR K 33*-l
.ICC 2339
RR 1C J»l
RR rc 329
RR
nt
RR
RR
8Mpp*r or rc-Ck-A
cot^tny
RR
RR
COKl
dllt.
13
13
13
U
13
13
13
13
U
13
16
10
10
19
19
1
9
3
1
e
i
7
|
7
3
1
9
3
1
t
3
1
2
1
9
1
2
3
1
t
}
j
6
9
6
0
6
6
6
6
13
13
*
6
10
10
at
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
u
u
u
11
u
u
u
u
10
10
10
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
7
7
7
u
u
10
16
u
10
u
u
u
u
11
u
ll
11
11
i.T.U.
13.366
13.386
11.106
0.3»
13,3*
13.396
13.306
IS.jtt
13.*6
u.n«
uln?
10.860
10.660
13.6U
13.336
13^11
13.336
13.612
13.336
13.612
13.336
13>96
13.612
13.336
13>96
13,612
13.336
13.612
13.336
13.612
13.336
13.6U
13.336
13.**
13.6U
13.336
U.k*
13,66)
13,663
U.989
13.663
D.663
13)663
13.663
13.66}
13, 386
13.366
13.663
13.663
ll.kOO
U.kOO
lO.zOD
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOQ
U.kOO
11, WO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U>90
U.kOA
U.k90
u!k90
11>90
u>*>
U.kOO
U.kOO
ll.kOO
U,k90
U.k9Q
U.<«90
11,490
u>-»
Il,k90
U,k90
Ik.OkO
Ik.OkO
Ik.OkO
U kQO
U.kOO
U.kOO
U,7k9
U.k90
ll.kOO
Il.k90
ll.hojo
Il!k90
ll.kOO
Il,k90
U,k90
Il.k90
ll.k^O
-------
57
TABLE A-2. • Transportation cost characteristics of bituminous coal shipped to selected consumerjJ/-Conlinued
To
I "V*
Kir 1 1 nv ton
'•"**"'
Renew
~~T55U< city
u!i«
*SuUm
ChtU Point
Dleheracn
LlM Kiln
Pop. Cr**k
Union Bridge
Vienna
**5SS""m
Sprlnnrield
M£\Citw
Detroit
[••em lie
Mdlend
itonroe
Tmton
Weil OH«
Vjrwidaite
CahMaet
tPnrixpollt
Mrthtowr.
^csS
fferhent
Slbley
'"oSoTT"'
H«y Jertey
itiimlc city
Cimey. M.
Clbbito«n
Gilbert
Perm* firo»»
Or I (tin point
or illilrlct 9]
Cwi'on 111.
l«f«y IF, 111.
Chf lie*. Okie
F.lkhom OUt. (Ry.)
ClewfleU Ol»t.
w<«to»rel«nd DUt.
C*ul*y Diet.
Clertttmrf DUt.
Cleerfleld OUt.
Wvitwnlwid Dltt.
Brown town, w.V«.
W*iti*)r«lend DUt.
faulty Dltt.
Uritnarcland Diet.
Ve*tii0r*ltnd DUt.
ClMrfleld DUt.
V,.t«>r»l«nd Dltt.
Clwfleld Hit.
WtLiBlrelafld til •> .
ClearfUld nut.
Vettmrrlwid nut.
ClierfUld Dill.
Wettaorelasid Dlit.
C.ulry DUt.
riearfleld DUt.
Uritv>r*l*nd DUt.
<"*uley DUt.
VrilJUrelaAd DUt.
Geuley
Ohio to Dlit.
Ohio « DUt.
Povtiaten. Ohio
Pot*i*tan. Chlo
Ohio 16 Dlit.
Ohio IB Dlit.
2unnyhlll, Ohio
Oorc«tc*n, Ohio
WUer. Ohio
Oneo, Chlo
Horeb Church, Ohio
Blecmvllle, V.V«.
Klrmele RUB. tf.V«.
Wane, V.Ve.
Jecktoo, Ohio
Freeport, Ohio
TrlidelphU. V.Vt.
!gypt. Ohio
Pumyhlll. Ohio
Croohivllle
Povhaltn. Ohio
Ohio Middle Cllt.,
CrooktvlUe. Ohio
Ohio «8
*>orcetoiiB, Ohio
Ohio 416
Eirypt, Ohio
Ohio *fl
Onto efl
Colilrlp, Ptoni.
Karrlilrurg. 111.
Southern 111. Group
Colttrlp. Nmt.
Chelte*. Okie.
Bf»..r. 111.
Cn*l«»». OUk.
r>imlnj Star Hlnti
F.1M. *.
Brv River (W.V*. )
ClnrfUld (P»,l
Affinity, tf.Ve.
ATflnlty. H. V».
Kcnevhe PI it.
Kwiewh* DUt.
Cletrfleld Dltt.
FSxehontM
load
;onnatet
2,000
2.000
2,000
2.500
6,000
0,000
5.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7.200
7,000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.0OO
7.0OO
7.000
7.000
7,ono
7,000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
10.000
7.00O
8.600
fi.bOO
7.000
10,000
6,600
B.60Q
8,600
8.600
8.600
8,600
8,600
6,600
10,000
9.750
9.750
7.000
9.750
9.750
10.000
7,000
10,000
6vOOO
7,000
7.000
7.800
10.000
9.750
10,000
7,000
10.000
10.9OO
10,900
10,900
3.000
fr.OOO
10.000
7.000
6.000
6.000
6.000
5,000
7.000
7,000
7.000
f',000
7.000
1.000
7.000
7,200
7.000
7.0no
7.000
7.200
7.?00
7.200
Rtte per ton
Kin. eanuAl In ccfltt
tar.n*£« Incl. X-267 Mileage
bOO .000
500,000
000.000
300.000
**, 000. 000
10,000.000
I. 000.000
1,000.000
1,000,000
1.000.000
i.ooo.ono
oon.ooo
10.000.000
1.200,000
1.900.000
100,000
1,000.000
1,500.000
1,750,000
300,000
300,000
1.000,010
1.000.000
1.000.000
?, 000.000
1.500.000
()00,OOO
lOfl
106
1C*
10.
at>
185
06
kit
1.87
U61
ue
Wl
dl6
tM
liliO
kit
Ii6»
U06
b17
1B7
1ft>
U81
M3
611
627
18)
611
813
597
6(13
367
U)9
2TO
288
kL8
236
J66
222
322
22Z
W3
293
236
287
37b
361*
300
287
306
339
388
179
377
il8
220
236
3U.
357
M!
353
321
307
U60
k22
Uk
181
206
179
151
132
125
169
106
U6
S78
1*1
585
616
59fl
56*
UU9
565
ei
83
Si
^>
»e
SIB
»
,„
3^6
157
288
123
Mf,
300
313
bl.U
3.V.
MS
2ko
323
3£6
1*1
326
522
059
770
510
656
767
551
701
812
3M
288
310
27U
2V
J95
315
306
330
231
391
396
393
272
157
157
376
336
268
2T9
U28
329
371
SO,
233
306
272
1*8
WO
231
789
7B9
789
769
650
7TT
6U
802
218
213
2 8
1 5
1 5
1 5
1 5
128
870
Uio
313
5B2
582
ue
520
260
!7B
R»tr per
too all.
1.301
1.377
l.?5*
J.780
.^76
.619
1.959
1.727
1-155
1.066
1.601
1.387
1^387
1.267
• 991
•359
.061
.122
• 921
.692
•353
.053
•331
.837
•37k
.1U8
1-117
• 92T
.81U
I.H1
•931
1.060
1.063
.892
.792
1-W5
.761.
929
l'635
•937
.976
.705
.725
.673
•961
.7M
.71*
.868
.Sob
i.oua
.883
.79*
!S32
1.756
1.389
•907
1.578
.Uto
1.923
•719
.868
•735
.893
1.923
.522
• k>7
^389
.71k
.660
.719
.526
.569
.830
• 9k5
l.!]k
l.Okl
.910
.862
.601
.828
.536
1.31li
!o05
.058
• 335
.068
.tifft
FF or
•hlpper
nvned
enutcnnt
PP
RR
RF
RP
TMpper sr
RR
HP
P.?
RR
RF
RR
RR
RF
RR
RF
RF
RB
RR
RR
RR
RR
RP
RJ»
RF
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RF
RF
RF
RR
RP
RR
Rfl
Kft
RF ,
Shipper or
RR
flp
RR
FR
Shipper
Shipper
Shipper
Chipper
Shipper
Shipper
RR
Shipper or
eamptaj
RR
Shipper
Shipper or
otMpeny
Shipper
PR
RF
Shipper or
coBptny
RR
TO
RR
FR
RR
Shipper or
eoMptny
ttR
Shipper
RR
RR
RR
RR
RF
RR
RR
rai
FF
FR
Shlpwr or
RR
RF
RF
RR
BTilpper
RF
Shipper or
Kilpper
RR
RP
RF
RF
RR
RR
RR
Tirlff Aver«*
refvrrao- Coal B.T.U.
n'd&tr V -till, r-r round
TB I 5 .'0513-H 11 ll.LOC
CB I 3 20510-Jt 10 ll.l>00
CB * 0 20MO-A 10 11AOO
CRT » P 36755-C 10 11.1*0
SWL 7J-Z It VJ.W
IW 12.29?
8 13.663
tCC 5-113 11,612
ICC C-ll]
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-11
ICC C-ll
ICC 0-11
ICC 0-11
ICC 0-11
ICC C-113
ICC C-113
ICC C-ll
ICC 0-11
ICC C-ll
tec c-ii
ICC 0-11
ICC C-ll
ICC C-ll
ICC O-ll
ICC C-ll
ICC 0-11
ICC C-113
ICC C-113
ICC C-113
ICC C-113
ICC C-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
ICC G-113
ICC 0-113
ICC 106
ICC 1C*
PRR 3308-B
PC C1&-A
icc A.?Q
ICC *-S5
ICC A-28
ICC A~26
ICC A-26
ICC A'2d
ICC A*?8
ICC *-2fl
ICC A-26
ICC A-26
B a 0 C-212
B * 0 C-21J
fl • 0 C-212
B a 0 C-21;
8*0 C-212
B t 0 C-21?
PC C-3
ICC 90
p » LI nj
icc c-iie
PRR 3106- B
B a 0 C-206-A
13.330
13.^96
13.612
13.336
1 J.tQfj
13.336
13133&
13.33«>
13.612
13.33<>
13 ! 612
13.33^
13.61?
13.3*>
13.61?
13-3.*
13.U96
13.3J&
13^36
12. 2Jk
12.23k
la.aifc
12)23^
12,23k
12,23li
12. asfc
12.?Jlt
12,23>>
ib'obO
llilobQ
12!2Jlt
12.23k
lit QbO
12, 23^
12,23li
12,23li
u, sy*
12,23^
12.23^
12.2V*
12. '23*1
12.23k
12,23k
12.23k
12.23k
I2'.?3k
•P 6061-A 22 10,280
22 10.280
22 10.280
22 10,2fiO
CB * Q 1900O-I 10 11. bOO
lit J26 10 U.dOO
10 11. tOO
tp 607SA n 10.280
SVL I2-I 22 10,280
22 10.280
22 10,?80
CB i g »)ok-o 10 ii.boo
10 11. un
10 U.WO
10 n. too
SVL 22.1 23 10.280
KP IflJ-A 2? 10,2ft)
P • LC 1*0-1 2 13.336
1U.OUO
;cc 0-105 13.612
iu lotto
13.663
13,663
13.612
-------
58
TABLE A-2. - Transportation cost characteristics of bituminous coal shipped to selected coniumersJt-Continueo1
. To
~GUnj
AitorU
Brww
BBtfftlO
Corinth
DrvMvft
Ouaklrfe
01««F.U.
Johnion City
UB*»tj»
UuUomtU*
Qmnf
iMtwitir
ItoMtoa
titnoactMj
Sol*«y
T: eoBtWrOHB
Timlin Cor*
Torty
Ttmvti
IOTU Co»llm
Bulmt
•rlc*
Cttwta
Kjw
taxtoro
TirrvU
^i»t*>«i»
•HUlMt
C«tco
Clwnljn*,
Dwten
•XT***
tprtftcfUU
Tolrto
ttWMTlTMU
i»tt
ftrldctport
"•»*-
ErU
truiivlUi
IUr«U..
ifcrtlni Cr*«t
Ortfln point
or dUtrlct?_y
ClWTfUU Dllt.
V*it*>rilmd Dllt.
Otulir Kit.
buy** Dllt.
Clnrruid
nttit*ui}i Diit.
Fklraoai Dllt.
ClnrfttlA OUt.
MraoldirtU* Dllt.
ClnrfUld Diit.
HiilADrvltfd Dirt.
Cftuliy
ClnrfUld Dllt.
Vtitaonltad Dllt.
C*ul«y Dlit.
Falraont Dlit.
Mvjmoldivlll* Dllt.
MttlbUr«h Dllt.
ClMi-Tlild Dllt.
HnunnliBd Dm.
C*ul»x Diit.
ClnrfUU Diit.
v*iiK>r*lin4 DUt.
ccui«r Diit.
Cl**rfUld Diet.
Writaor*lABd Dl*t.
ClnrfUld Lilt.
Guilty Dtit.
M»Uld», Ft.
ClwrfUld Mil.
"••taonliDd Dlit.
G*ul«) Diet.
mtiburib Diit.
Ftlrmt Dllt.
ClnrfUld PI it.
RvynoldiTriLlij
ClnrfUld Dllt.
w^rtKntlMid Diit.
OttU*y Dill.
ClnrfUld DUt.
w**tKir*lud Diit.
Oaulry Dtit.
ClnrfUld Diit.
ifeitvtnUad Dirt.
0*ul«7 Diit.
Clnrfl*ld Diit.
ortuTntt? ""'
ClnrfUld DUt.
W»it«>r«liad Diit.
Gtulij DUt.
ClMTfUld Dllt.
ClwrfUld Mil.
ViitMonloBA Dllt.
C«iU«T
A7pUu:hU. V..
cii«h vfcUiy fe (?•
SI. FMJ, V*.
AppolactxU, V».
hnmr, Vt.
Uln. Vi.
HUTU, V.T*.
Ulu, V».
uooUT Ohio
MUM-, Ohio
Or let), Ohio
Ohio IB
C«dM, Ohio
•triMlt. Ohio
PlMy Fork. Ohio
§it, fMo
rort: Ohio
Ohio
Ohio
9
, — .-ilrwtijB. Ohio
'Ohio K
Ohio M
NHDdrrtUi, V.Ti.
Ohio «
Ohio «
Ohio *9
Arnold. Ohio
LnlBKton. Ohio
Thwkir DUt.
Ohio Mlddli
KMMM
ClMrfltld Dlit.
MitaoralKid Dlit.
SSSlSfilrt.
v*i^MDr«\HtA Mrt.
Osulty DUt.
OwUi)' Diit.
mrcfr-ButltT Mit.
Clnrflild DUt.
MitBonlud Dllt.
Gwilty nil.
ClnrfUld DUt.
Cwiliy Diit.
Clnrflild DUt.
VvitMnlMd Hit.
Kin. train*
load
torwiftcvi
7,000
7,000
7.000
10,000
7. MO
7.OOO
7,000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.0CO
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7. 000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7,700
7.000
7,000
7.000
6,130
8,600
9.000
) 7.000
6,1)0
8.600
9.800
5.000
9.000
5.000
7,200
5.000
9.000
3.000
10,000 ;
9,000 (
5.000 <
9.000 t
9.000 C
3,000 (
9.000
8,000
8,000
8.000
6,000
5.000
5.ooo
e
7. 000
9.000
7.000
9,500 7
6.000 fl
9
9.500 k
10.000
10.000
7.000 V
7,000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7,000
10.000
7,000
7,000
7.000
Ma. wrau.
tonom
900.000
.100,000
,900,000
.790,000
.790,000
00,000
90.000
,100,000
,900,000
.750.000
.700,000
.WO, COO
.600.000
.900,000
,600,000
,900.000
.900.000
DO, 000
00.000
00,000
30,000
00,000
150,000
70,000
30,000
30,000
£0.000
00.000
tett pir toe
1 In crati
1M1. X-867
*99
5*5
57]
hio
*30
3$
537
56*
593
*70
W)6
*C6
3kk
372
537
56k
3
TO
528
5k5
kS6
503
kTl
500
518
397
U9
397
kio
k99
328.
k99
526
5*5
*96
U06
503
569
597
*99
528
*31
<00
53o
6k3
293
282
270
301
ua
256
nk
207
200
312
282
332
278
28a
$
99
98
i
21k
961
20B
7b*
259
*73
*73
3g
U5
260
339
*3
*09
877
393
*96
*M
503
*69
*87
is
k87
276
k28
*59
503
299
is
ieiM<.
koa
5k3
65k
532
22k
300
393
305
209
567
679
k8l
609
T19
335
1*7
90
229
659
770
261
502
386
538
6»9
360
U6
557
k51
505
ra
376
kjk
313
266
550
651
T62
395
528
639
312
537
VO
T»k
575
676
787
300
377
500
611
312
312
312
18k
217
217
282
282
282
313
313
289
289
252
309
309
135
22
35
k3
36
2k
33
165
101
120
250
262
'2
67
M
188
201
90
376
150
196
267
ttl
532
263
kco
511
276
*17
528
88
232
366
k77
275
532
359
286
5k8
bt. p*r
too milt
In not.
1.223
.972
.833
.993
1.367
1.09*
as
1.237
.995
.960
.913
.773
.679
1.212
ys
1.62k
1.26k
.656
.757
1.7*7
1.2*3
1.002
1.293
.961
.8*0
1.267
1.090
998
1.365
.990
.693
1.056
1.033
1.268
1.5*1
.907
.811
.715
1.863
1.000
.853
I.k62
l.lkl
.937
1.125
•R
.868
.781
.693
l.kJ7
1.058
l.f,:
1.0V
.939
• 90k
.965
1.636
l.BkB
1.190
.759
•73k
•709
.997
.701
1.176
I.lk9
.953
.916
1.206
k.k53
2.800
2.279
2.722
k.093
I.k97
1.582
2.059
2.033
1.692
2.616
1.805
2.319
2l269
1 667
*.796
1.098
7.777
1.09B
1.706
1.15*
.9*5
1.668
1.173
.953
1.583
1.125
.927
3.136
1.8*5
1.751
i.ooa
1.658
:&
1.59*
!918
ra or
ihlpp*r
OVBtd
•ouliami
ra
M
ra
ra
ra
n
ra
ra
ra
ra
ra
M
RR
ra
ra
M
rat
ra
ra
ra
ra
ra
M
ra
ra
ra
ra
n
ra
n
ra
ra
ra
ra
n
ra
ra
n
ra-
ni
n
KB
ra
n
D
ra
BB
ni
n
nt
K3
ra
ra
ra
ra
ra
n
ra
ra
n
ra
n
ra
ra
ra
n
19
n
ra
ra
n
n
ra
i
ra
n
n
n
ra
ra
:ov>*7
:
-------
59
TABLE A-2. • Tronsportotion coit character! sties of bituminous coal shipped to selected consumer j-W-Continued
Orl«ln pjloi
Pttmu],v»f\u (cant.)
Mrtttai Clwfltld nut.
(Uulty DUt.
RMdlnf ClMrflvld nut.
w*itaar*lwri nut,
r*ui»)i Pitt.
Bvlor ClMrflild DUt.
WMt»or«ltnil nut.
r«uii> nut.
Bhuotln DM P»nfUH, P».
Cooki Pun, (^.
rinrruiii i.
ClMTTleld W.
H*tt*or*lwid DUt.
r*ui*y nin.
Bprlnf drove CletrfUld PUt.
W*«lv>r«lwid nut.
C*ul*y PUl.
roi* fkwm fluwrun, P«.
cietrruid Dut.
W«taDr*l*nd nut.
gwtlLCjtrol jna
Ottrlaitan Olenbra*. *j.
Htrtvl Ue UM*M
Ira Cuvjburi, V.V*.
felitr Ulm. V..
Nln. trmln-
lo*d Kin. tnmul
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7,000
7.000
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7,000
7.000
7.000
y.oon
7.000
7.000
7,000
7.0OO
7,000
10,000 1,800.000
10,000 be* ••
7.000
7,000
7.200
5,000 1,500,000
7.200
5.000
5,000 750,000
Rkt* per ten
In erntt
U56
503
LTB
b86
507
2U6
218
269
302
35
1*86
507
398
U37
218
s
M7
522
376
ti9Q
MO
278
1.J2
222
263
390
137
107
130
157
LQi
512
207
1*26
139
139
186
299
396
592
320
264
Rtte per
ion til*
1.6W)
1.125
.9B6
1.919
1.272
1.017
1.73h
l!oi2
1.796
?.037
2.069
1.92"
.U9
1.212
.990
1-963
1.387
1.073
1.565
1.1.32
2.183
1.316
• 729
.682
.921
1.36h
1.JW
PR or
ihlpp»r
own*d
RR
RR
RR
rat
RR
RR
ra
RR
RR
Shipper or
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
Shipper or
ecwqwny
RR
rat
RR
RR
RR
r*r«r*net Coi
mjrt«r 3/ di
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106 •
CC 106
11R C329U
TW A]291C
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
CC 106
TO C-20-B
CC C-113
CC 0-113
rri lias
,
.
ini 11 ok E
U B.T.U.
t. p»r pound
13.612
13.336
13.***
13.612
13.336
13>96
13.612
13.336
13.^96
13.612
1J.612
13.612
13.612
13.612
13.336
13)612
13.336
13)612
13.336
13.336
13.612
13.336
13.661
13.663
13.663
13.663
13.66]
13.663
Ottrlaitan Olmbronk, ^.
Hwtvl lie KMW«rfw
Ira Cuvjburi, V.V*.
taller Ulm. V«.
Ujah
n*n«v* 8lvn Lyn vtr«lntwi PUt,
Mn.am.tr. PM^nnl..
HUenmttn
0»k Cr*«h SMrvoort PUt.
rVlton Co. 111.
9prln«ri*U ntti.
W. Prvnkrort. til.
V>
.786
.621
.608
• 590
.50k
• 635
• V-7
RR
rat
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
ttR
19
RF
RR
RR
fl*
RR
rat
Shipper or
Shipper or
co^ny
orra 1193
mi 11 ok
MOV 7510*
DRQU Til CU
DRRW 75111
ICC 0-113
ICC 0-113
C k 0 2JD
C * IT 71621
C k •« 71621
C t IV 71621
C * IV 71621
C k «» 71621
1C JJk9
1C 13^9
CB * Q 205. .
CTU 1T1T?1
8
8
8
16
2O
16
1
2
3
8
7
8
8
7
7
7
10
0
0
0
0
0
4
10
*
It lUt
13.661
13.663
13.663
13.663
13.66]
13.663
9.1-31
12,610
9.1.31
13.612
3:8
13.663
13^663
13.663
l^GW
1»..OW
U.<40
11, bOO
11. MX)
ll.UOO
11,1*00
11. WO
12.285
LI, 1*00
11. WO
ed tj ttM
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA
SHEET
1. Report No.
Kenort No.
APTD-0714
3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Title- und Subt itlc
Transportation
Costs of Fossil Fuels
5' Report Date
June 1971
6.
7. Author(s)
8. Performing Organization Kept.
No.'
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
United States Department
of Mines, Mineral Supply
4800 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
of the Interior - Bureau
15213
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Comract/Grant No.
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Programs
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
13. Type of Report & Period
Coveted
Interim
14.
IS. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstracts
The report delineates some of the important factors relating to the costs
of transporting fossil fuels from regions of production to sits of con-
sumption. The costs of shipping coal have been presented in a quantified
fashion for selected producing area to areas of consumption. The costs
of shipping residual fuel oil and natural gas from domestic and foreign
sources to New York and San Francisco Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Areas are also provided. The .collected transportation data were
stratified to determine the ge'neral effects stratification had upon trans
portation costs. Economics^ of haul.for coal do i:Aist for longer versus
shorter distances, larger frainload . versus smaller trainload sizes, and
company-owned car ownership versus railroad car ownership. Most of the
rates for the longer voyages for the tanker andvbarge transportation of
residual oil also show economies of haul.
17. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17o. Descriptors
Trans porta tion
Fossil fuels
Coal
Natural gas
Residual oils
Cos t analysis
Rail transportation
Waterway transportation
I7b. Identif icrs/Opcn-Ended Terms
17e. COSATI Field/Group 2 ID
18. Availability Statement
Unlimited
19.. Security Class (This
Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
20. Security Class (This
Page
UNCLASSIFIED
21. No. of Pages
62
22. Ptice
FORM NTIJ-SO (10-701
USCOMM-OC 40328-P7I
------- |