-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socio-economic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the INTERAGENCY ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT series. Reports in this series result from the
effort funded under the 17-agency Federal Energy/Environment Research and
Development Program. These studies relate to EPA's mission to protect the public
health and welfare from adverse effects of pollutants associated with energy sys-
tems. The goal of the Program is to assure the rapid development of domestic
energy supplies in an environmentally-compatible manner by providing the nec-
essary environmental data and control technology. Investigations include analy-
ses of the transport of energy-related pollutants and their health and ecological
effects; assessments of, and development of, control technologies for energy
systems; and integrated assessments of a wide range of energy-related environ-
mental issues.
EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the participating Federal Agencies, and approved
for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Government, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/7-86-012b
April 1986
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF A COAL/WATER SLURRY
FIRED INDUSTRIAL BOILER
Volume II
Data Supplement
By
0. Van Buren and L. R. Waterlawid
Acurex Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
555 Clyde Avenue
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, California 94039
EPA Contract No. 68-02-3188
EPA Project Officer: J. A. McSorley
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
For
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to extend their gratitude to R. Perkins and
S. Hodorowski of the E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company and R. Manfred of
the Electric Power Research Institute. Their Interest and cooperation 1n
this test program and their efforts In arranging the opportunity to test the
unit are gratefully acknowledged. Special recognition 1s also extended to
the Acurex field test team of B. C. Daros, S. Smith, M. Murray, P. Kaufmann,
and K. Brewster.
11
-------
CONTENTS
1 Introduction 1-1
2 Boiler Operation Data 2-1
3 Sampling Data Sheets 3-1
3.1 Continuous Montitoring Data 3-3
3.2 EPA Method 5/8 Field Data 3-9
3.3 Source Assessment Sampling System (SASS) Field
Data 3-25
3.4 Volatile Organic Sampling Train (YOST) Field
Data 3-35
3.5 Cj to Cs Hydrocarbon Analysis Data 3-39
4 Laboratory Analysis Results 4-1
4.1 Trace Element Analyses 4-3
4.2 TCO, GRAV, GC/MS, and IR Analyses of SASS
Samples 4-17
4.3 GC/MS Analysis of VOST Traps 4-25
4.4 Bioassay Analysis Report 4-31
m
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this data supplement is to document data in greater
detail than was possible in Volume I (Technical Results) of this report. It
is intended to provide sufficient detail for researchers to perform their own
analysis of the data obtained. Readers are referred to the technical volume
t
for objectives, description of source emission results, data interpretation,
and conclusions.
The remaining sections of this data supplement contain the following
information:
Section 2 -- Boiler Operting Data: pressures, temperatures, and flowrates;
efficiency calculations using the ASME heat loss method
Section 3 — Sampling Data Sheets: continuous monitor data summary;
operating data tables and isokinetic calculations for EPA Method
5/8 (for particulate mass and SOg and 503 emissions), SASS (for
trace element and semi- and nonvolatile organic sampling), and
VOST (for volatile organic sampling); and GI to Cg hydrocarbon
analysis data by onsite GC/FID
Section 4 — Laboratory Analysis Results: trace element results by spark
source mass spectrometry (SSMS), atomic absorption spectroscopy
(AAS), and other methods; total chromatographable organic (TCO)
and gravimetric (GRAV) results, determination of semivolatile
1-1
-------
organic priority pollutants by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry (QC/MS), and infrared (IR) spectra of total sample
extracts; analyses of YOST traps by GC/MS; and biological assay
reports.
1-2
-------
SECTION 2
BOILER OPERATING DATA
2-1
-------
BOILER OPERATING DATA: 8-25-83
SI urry
Flowrate
Time
0815
0930
1015
1115
1200
1245
1330
1425
1500
1600
1700
1745
1845
Average
Inlet
Kir
Temp.
(*F)
85
88
92
93
98
99
99
101
102
99
98
99
97
96
Windbox
Air
Temp.
m
523
523
518
518
520
520
521
522
519
517
520
517
518
520
Windbox
Pressure
(in. HC)
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.2
Economizer
Gas Inlet
Temp.
CF)
540
525
532
533
535
540
542
526
529
533
539
542
544
535
Header
Temp.
CF)
98
98
98
99
100
101
100
99
99
100
101
101
101
100
Pump
Pressure
(psig)
206
205
204
204
204
210
214
212
214
210
210
210
209
Strainer
Discharge
Pressure
(psig)
196
200
200
200
198
198
196
198
Magnetic
Meter
(gpm)
9.38
9.36
9.36
9.33
9.30
9.30
9.29
9.27
9.26
9.25
9.24
9.26
9.26
9.30
Mass
Meter
(gpm)
9.95
10.09
10.11
10.08
9.92
9.86
9.82
9.85
9.76
9.79
9.72
9.65
9.72
9.87
(continued)
2-2
-------
BOILER OPERATING DATA: 8-25-83 (continued)
Natural Gas Flow
Burner
No. 4
Time (1Q3 scfh)
0815
0930
1015
1115
1200
1245
1330
1425
1500
1600
1700
1745
1845
Average
3.72
3.79
3.51
3.21
2.99
2.99
2.94
2.96
2.98
2.93
2.89
2.96
2.96
3.14
Air
Heater
(103 scfh)
3.73
3.69
3.69
3.61
3.52
3.51
3.51
3.56
3.46
3.35
3.45
3.50
3.55
3.55
Steam
Pressue
(psig)
173
176
175
175
175
175
175
175
175
176
174
175
175
175
Feedwater
Economizer Economizer
Feed Inlet Outlet
Flow Temp. Temp. Temp.
(103 Ib/hr) CF) CF> (*F)
55.7
56.0 265
55.7 265
55.7
54.6 265
55.0
54.9 ' 265
56.5
55.7
55.2
55.9 265
55.8
55.2 265
55.5 265
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
262
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
(continued)
2-3
-------
BOILER OPERATING DATA: 8-25-83 (continued)
Burner #2
Time
081S
0930
1015
1115
1200
1245
1330
1425
1500
1600
1700
1745
1845
Average
Air
Pressure
(psig)
206
206
204
206
206
206
204
206
204
206
206
206
206
Slurry
Pressure
(psig)
168
166
164
164
164
164
166
167
168
168
168
167
166
Burner #3
Air
Pressure
(psig)
206
206
206
208
208
208
208
208
207
208
208
208
208
Slurry
Pressure
(pslg)
166
164
164
164
162
162
166
166
166
166
166
166
165
Burner #4
Air
Pressure
(psig)
206
204
204
206
204
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
Slurry
Pressure
(psig)
168
176
176
174
174
174
178
178
179
178
178
178
176
Furnace
Pressure
(1n. WC)
-0.15
-0.31
-0.31
-0.30
-0.30
-0.31
-0.31
-0.40
-0.16
-0.16
-0.15
-0.16
-0.16
-0.24
Stack
Temp.
CF)
571
559a
567
572
574
577
580
561b
563
568
574
578
576
571
Stack
°2
(X day)
6.7
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.6
6.8
7.0
6.7
6.7
7.8
6.7
6.8
6.8
aSoothf!ow at 0915
bSoothflow at 1400
2-4
-------
SUMMARY SHEET
ASME TEST FORM
FOR ABBREVIATED EFFICIENCY TEST
PTC
TEST NO / BOILER NO. / OA 7 E ^ -J£~-> 5
OWNER OF PLANT A~/0nT" LOCATION $"/-,/<_ 4" MINE COUNTY STATE SIZE AS <='R£D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
PRESSURES & TEMPERATURES FUEL DATA
STEAM PRESSURE IN BOILER DRUM
STEAM PRESSURE AT S. H. OUTLET
STEAM PRESSURE AT R. H. INLET
STEAM PRESSURE AT R. H. OUTLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT S- H. OUTLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT R H INLET
STEAM TEMPERATURE AT R.H. OUTLET
WATER TEMP. ENTERING (ECON bTSoiLER)}
^— — "^
STEAM QUALITY*; MOISTURE OR P. P.M.
AIR TEMP. AROUND BOILER (AMBIENT)
TEMP AIR FOR COMBUSTION
(This is Reference Temperature) t
TEMPERATURE OF FUEL
GAS TEMP. LEAVING (Boiler iffeeory^Uir Htr.)
GAS TEMP. ENTERING AH (irnsnsinons to be
corrected to auorantee)
UNIT QUANTITIES
ENTHALPY OFiAT-rtlQtWO (TOTAL HEAT)
ENTHALPY rfF (SATURATED! (SUPERHEATED)
STM. v-— --"^
ENTHALPY OF SAT. FEED TO/fcJoiLERO
(ECON.) v -^
ENTHALPY OF REHEATED STEAM R.H. INLET
ENTHALPY OF REHEATED STEAM R. H.
OUTLET
HEAT ABS/LBOF STEAM (ITEM 16 -ITEM 17)
HEAT ABS/L8 R.H. STEAM(IT|M 19 - ITEM 18)
DRY REFUSE (ASH PIT * ( LY ASJj^PER LB
AS FIRED FUEL >B=
Biu PER LB IN REFUSE (WEIGHTED AVERAGE)
CARBON BURNED PER LB AS FIRED FUEL
DRY GAS PER LB AS FIRED FUEL BURNED
psio
psio
psio
psid
F
F
f
F
F
F
F
F
F
Btu/lb
Btu/lb
Btu/lb
Btu/lb
Btu/lb
Btu'lb
Btu/lb
Ib/lb
Btu/tb
Ib/lb
Ib, Ib
HOURLY QUANTITIES
ACTUAL WATER EVAPORATED
REHEAT STEAM FLOW
RATE OF FUEL FIRING (AS FIRED *t)
TOTAL HEAT INPUT ('"V" 2B * ''•m 4|'
HEAT OUTPUT IN SLOW-DOWN WATER
I2Iit> (Item 26. Item 20)+(llem 27x1 tern 21 ) * Item 30
OUTPUT 1000
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
Ib/hr
kB/hr
kB/hr
kB/hr
ffo
,>c>
/0,J
5c*
%
/GLJ
cr- •) i
/IT.
m
/cQ-O
&&>{
(eC?^.
StfVO
FLUE GAS ANAL. (BOILERl(ECON) (AIR HTR) OUTLET
CO,
o,
CO
N, (BY DIFFERENCE)
EXCESS AIR
% VOL
% VOL
% VOL
% VOL
*
^.^
/ O
—
JS^S*
**«Cv
COAL AS FIRED
PROX. ANALYSIS
37
38
39
40
MOISTURE
VOL MATTER
FIXED CARBON
ASH
TOTAL
41
42
Btu per Ib AS FIRED
ASH SOFT TEMP.'
ASTM METHOD
% wt
j?7. 7
7.0.
S&H^
COAL OR OIL AS FIREO
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS
43
44
45
46
47
40
37
CARBON
HYDROGEN
OXYGEN
NITROGEN
SULPHUR
ASH
MOISTURE
TOTAL
sV^Cf
3.L
?. ~C~
AO
O-H
vi
5^. ~i
'f-vO
COAL PULVERIZATION
48
49
SO
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
)»
GRINDABILITY
INDEX*
FINENESS %THRU
50 M-
FINENESS % THRU
200 M'
INPUT.OUTPUT
EFFICIENCY OF UNIT %
51
52
S1
44
41
OIL
FLASH POINT F'
Sp. Gravity Deg. API*
VISCOSITY AT SSU-
BURNER SSF
TOTAL HYDROGEN
Btu per Ib
GAS
54
55
S6
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
41
£&~
CH4 METHANE
^•^SSSTE
CArt^CTIIVLC^C
C,H» ETHANE
H,S
CO,
H, HYDROGEN
TOTAL
TOTAL HYDROGEN
% wt
r. VOL
0.^
%.(J
0. 1
cJ. /
"5 "i
—
/. /
s'
/tv ^
DENSITY 68 F
ATM. PRESS.
Btu PER CU FT
Btu PER LB
ITEM 31 « 100 ~.
ITEM 29 *
Btu/lb
HEAT LOSS EFFICIENCY A. F. FUEL
HEAT LOSS DUE TO DRY GAS /(o^L>
HEAT LOSS DUE TO MOISTURE IN FUEL '37'V
HEAT LOSS DUE TO HaO FROM COMB OFH, '/oV
HEAT LOSS DUE TO COMBUST. IN REFUSE -s^ ^
HEAT LOSS DUE TO RADIATION 7 *-f
UNMEASURED LOSSES
TOTAL
EFFICIENCY - (100 - liem 71)
'
?.<7
~?..^L
0-^1
—
PV.«J
7J.C
'Not Required for Efficiency Testing
t For Point of Measurement See Par. 7.2.8.1-PTC 4.1-1964
2-5
-------
CALCULATION SHEET
ASME TEST FORM
FOR ABBREVIATED EFFICIENCY TEST
PTC 4.1-b (1964)
Revised September. 1965
OWNER OF PLANT TEST NO. BOILER NO. DATE
30
24
25
36
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
F ITEM 15 ITEM 17"
1000
If fmproctfco/ to weigh refuse, this
item can be estimated as follows
DRY REFUSE PER LD Of A' HRCD FUEL * **" 'N *S RRE° COAL TIOTl! IP T
100- 14 COMB. IN REFUSE SAMPLE pj"TReFUSE
i— — , ' , IN COMBUST
ITEM 43 [7TEM22 ITEM231 £^ lo( SHOULD BE
CARBON BURNED -. f . . . . .Lr^"1, , j-»»nnii» * •,,
FUEU 100 | 14,500 (.uimruimi
DRY CAS PER LB 11 CO, + 80, » 7(N, » CO)
BURNED 3(CO> + C0> / \ j-
ITEM 32 ITEM 33 | ITEM 35 ITEM 34 ] ITEM 24
11X .?/? 48x..^v>. * 7l^f.-C + ^*»../ x £V>1W
kB/hr
LUE OUST & ASH
DIFFER MATERIALLY
IBLE CONTENT. THEY
ESTIMATED
Y. SEE SECTION 7,
ONS.
• +-g-S)
ITEM 47
* o-tf.. . ft-ri
(ITEM 32 ITEM 34 \ ,„
9^rr.* ..r:.) L J
EXCESS °i - C° ITFM11 - ITGM 34
AIRt 100 X ' 100 K /.O 2
.2682N, - (n _ C0_ ,
7 .2M2 (ITEM 35) - (ITEM 33 - )
^?.^ ->0 2
HEAT LOSS EFFICIENCY
HEAT LOSS DUE LB DRY GAS ITEM 25 (ITEM 131 HTEM111
TO DRY GAS PER LB AS xC x {'U, - 'air) = >yj!l x 0.24 ( ™ I3)-(ITEM "'.
FIRED FUEL p Unlt /-%/.. S^/. ^. . .
HEAT LOSS DUE TO LB H,O PER LB „ frcuTUAi ov nc VAPHD AT I PSIA A T BA< I vn
MOISTURE IN FUEL = AS F^RED FUEL x l(ENTHALPY OF V*POR yffi /t>S;
- (ENTHALPY OF LlOUIDAT T AIR)] - ITEM 37 « [(ENTHALPY OF^APOR
AT 1 PSIA & T ITEM 13) -(ENTHALPY OF LIQUID »T T ITEM 11)] =
HEAT LOSS DUE TO H,0 FROM COMB. OF H, = 9H, x ({ENTHALPY OF VAPOR AT 1 PSIA & T GAS
j^, ^.k /-*y5_ LVG) -(ENTHALPY OF LIQUID AT T AIR)]
. 0 „ ITEM 44 x [
t Far rigorout det«nnlna«len of e«e«t^ air »•• Appendix 9.2 - PTC 4.1.1964
• If lot««« ar« not m*a*u»d, o«« ABMA Standard Radiation Loss Chart, Fig. 8, PTC 4.1-J964
*• Unmeasured losses listed in PTC 4.1 but not tabulated above may by provided for by assigning a mutually
•greed upon value for Item 70.
2-6
-------
SECTION 3
SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
3.1 Continuous Monitoring Data
3.2 EPA Method 5/3 Field Data
3.3 Source Assessment Sampling System (SASS) Field Data
3.4 Volatile Organic Sampling Train (YOST) Field Data
/
3.5 GI to Cg Hydrocarbon Analysis Data
3-1
-------
3.1 CONTINUOUS MONITORING DATA
3-2
-------
Continuous Monitoring Data : 8/25/83
Stack gas
Date/Time
0:01
0:30
1:00
1:39
2:00
2:29
3:00
3:29
4:00
4:30
5:00
5:30
6:00
6:30
7:00
7:30
8:50
8:55
9:00
9:05
9: 10
9:14
9:19
9:25
9:30
9:35
9:39
9:44
9:50
9:55
10:00
10:05
10:10
10:14
10:19
10:25
10:30
10:35
10:39
10:44
10:50
10:55
11:00
11:05
11:10
NOz
(ppm)
380.
390.
385.
385.
385.
370.
380.
380.
380.
375.
370.
375.
370.
370.
375.
370.
400.
400.
405.
400.
400.
400.
390.
385.
385.
395.
385.
390.
390.
375.
390.
390.
395.
390.
395.
390.
390.
385.
390.
380.
390.
395.
385.
385.
390.
02
(%)
7 7
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.1
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.8
6.8
8.4
8.0
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.2
(all readings dry
C02 S02 CO
(%) (ppm) (ppm)
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.9
9.9
9.8
9.9
9.9
9.9
9.9
10.0
9.9
9.8
9.9
9.9
9.9
9.7
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.2
9.1
8.9
8.8
9.3
9.2
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.6
10.0
9.9
9.8
9.7
9.7
395.
425.
445.
465.
490.
530.
535.
555.
555.
590.
610.
635.
660.
660.
730.
730.
230.
245.
220.
215.
205.
205.
250.
200.
205.
225.
205.
210.
205.
215.
220.
215.
215.
210.
205.
210.
225.
200.
215.
230.
210.
215.
220.
240.
220.
basis
) :
TUHC Temp .
(ppm) (Deg .F) Comment
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2c
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1.
2.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1.
4.
2.
3.
4.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1.
2.
2.
4.
2.
2.
2.
1.
2.
2.
3.
1.
563.
567.
569.
570.
572. Sootblow
552.
559.
562.
566.
587
569.
571.
573.
579. Sootblow
562.
565. Calibrate monitors
572. All monitors online
574.
571.
573.
573.
572. Sootblow
560.
550.
555.
557.
558.
559.
560.
562.
562.
563.
564.
558.
570.
569.
570.
571.
570.
566.
569.
570.
570.
570.
572.
3-3
-------
Continuous Monitoring Data : 8/25/83 (continued)
Stack gas
Date/Time
11:14
11:19
11:25
11:30
11:35
11:39
11:44
11:50
11:55
12:00
12:05
12:10
12: 14
12:19
12:25
12:30
12:35
12:39
12:44
12:50
12:55
13:00
13:05
13:10
13:14
13:19
13:35
13:39
13:44
13:50
13:55
14:00
14:05
14:10
14:14
14:19
14:25
14.30
14:35
14:39
14:44
14:50
14:55
15:00
15:05
NOx
(ppm)
390.
390.
395.
395.
390.
390.
390.
395.
395.
395.
395.
400.
390.
395.
390.
390.
395.
395.
395.
385.
390.
390.
390.
395.
390.
385.
395.
395.
395.
400.
395.
380.
385.
405.
405.
395.
390.
400.
400.
405.
410.
405.
405.
405.
405.
02
(%)
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.1
7. 1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.9
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.9
7.0
7.0
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.6
6.6
(all readings dry
CO2 SO2 CO
(%) (ppm) (ppm)
9.6
9.4
9.3
9.2
9.2
9.3
9.3
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.6
9.6
9.7
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.4
9.8
9.7
9.6
9.4
9.3
9.0
8.9
9.2
9.4
9.2
9.4
9.3
9.7
9.5
9.4
9.5
9.5
9.7
9.7
220.
225.
230.
230.
235.
230.
245.
255.
260.
250.
260.
255.
265.
255.
255.
255.
270.
275.
270.
275.
270.
280.
290.
285.
285.
290.
290.
295.
300.
320.
320.
330.
345.
345.
335.
335.
340.
350.
340.
340.
340.
325.
335.
325.
335.
basis
) :
TUHC Temp .
(ppm)(Deg.F) Comment
1.
1.
1.
6.
3.
2.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
2.
2.
2.
4.
3.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
3.
4.
2.
2.
572.
572.
576.
573.
573.
573.
575.
575.
574.
575.
575.
574.
575.
575.
576.
576.
576.
576.
576.
576.
576.
577.
576.
576.
578.
578.
579.
579.
580.
579.
579.
579.
580.
579.
579.
571. Sootblow
563.
564.
563.
565.
564.
564.
564.
565.
564.
3-4
-------
Continuous Monitoring Data : 8/25/83 (concluded)
Stack gas
Date/Time
15:10
15:14
15:19
15:25
15.30
15:35
15:39
15:44
15:50
15:55
16:00
16:04
16:10
16:14
16:20
16:25
17:14
17:45
18:14
18:45
19:00
19:29
20:00
20:29
21:00
21:29
22:00
22:29
23:00
23:29
NOx
(ppm)
410.
410.
410.
405.
405.
400.
405.
405.
400.
390.
390.
400.
395.
410.
415.
410.
436.
429.
425.
418.
421.
423.
413.
412.
413.
408.
404.
396.
404.
400.
02
(%)
6.6
8.6
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
7.7
5.7
7. 1
7.0
6.9
6.8
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.3
6.2
6.2
6.1
(all readings dry basis]
C02 SO2
(%) (ppm)
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.7
9.6
9.4
9.5
9.5
9.7
9.6
9.4
9.4
9.5
9.5
9 . 8 349 .
9 . 4 349 .
9 . 7 349 .
9.8 349.
9.7
9.8
9.7
9.9
9.6
9.7
9.4
9.3
9.3
9.3
t .
CO TUHC Temp .
(ppm) (ppm) (Deg . F) Comment
330.
330.
335.
345.
340.
335.
345.
345.
350.
355.
355.
360.
360.
365.
370.
375.
209.
223.
223.
234.
286.
278.
279.
286.
320.
324.
334.
349.
367.
380.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1. .
1 .
1 .
1.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
565.
565.
566.
566.
566.
567
568.
568.
569.
568.
569.
570.
570.
570.
570.
571. Calibrate monitors
572. All monitors online
576. Method 8 SO2 test
579.
577. TUHC monitor
556. inoperative
556.
557.
560.
562.
565.
567.
570.
571.
571.
3-5
-------
3.2 EPA METHOD 5/8 FIELD DATA
3-6
-------
ACUREX CORPORATION
Run J -
Acurex Project No.
Field Dates 2<
Plant
Sampling Location ^0
Sampling Date
-lg'-g 7
FIELD CREW
Crew Chief:
£eocf C. ,
Testing Engineer: 1
Engr. Technician: 1
Lab Technician: 1
Process Engineer: 1
900222
900215
900214
900223
900224
900231
900229
fv
FIELD SAMPLE REFERENCE NUMBERS
<-•=*, o
/A)f>-
s~it-*
SV-J..2.
~~JP£
ro-i-
<^f*-
6,11.-1
^a^.1
"f f .
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
- (Ac
- fe
PLANT _,
DATE . _
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE B) _
STACK I.D., (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR »vi fti.i.i^.y/
S-f.ST;
-S-ST.o*
gP,P"
0
O O
CVO
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
)
a
2
V-
f
(c,
1
*
<7
lo
H
«Z.
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
•
STACK I.D.
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8 INCH)
DISTANCE B
V-. 3.ir va-ir
Mi-ti £7.Mr
EPA (Our) 232
4/72
3-8
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
P.ANT .TW-*r-rfA
5SURE. in. H,0 ._ - n. C '
/ /
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
A-\
^
5
Y"
r~
c,
1
s
s
lo
il
A - IZ
£~ *
•z.
3
vj.
r
c»
"7
9
<)
10
• i
£-\E-
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
(&ps), in.H20
• OH-
. 3e
.5-0
,5T
-vr
->*
. YC
-Yf
.>&•
• 1L
• 2r
• Bo
P'
£
• i?
-?£~
•5t
•^r
•*tr
•^sr
.40
.Yo
• N-Q
,30
STACK
TEMPERATURE
ars). -F
5-\*i
?"s-\
^5-H-
rr^
^1 _^
^n
5*$?
^^^
^$" *7
^•/^
r««o
>«)3
5"t^
r^i
^z
5:5"^
5* 5^**
c*^^ o
^•y
rr^r
r^
f*^ fa
£>3-
M-'JV.
EPA (Our) 233 ^ . S Y \ ^p a^
472 •vT'*'1 vj
I
i
j
s
» *^-
•3 a
f I . V i t '
p : : •
: ^ .• • i
* 1 i \'i 11. ^r. \^. i
V" J
f
SCHEMATIC C
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
- 1
2.
3
V
5"
6
7
S-
^
/o
M
/L
AVERAGE
J U U U
N C. (^ ^
F TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
VELOCITY
HEAD
(&ps), in^O
.or
•HO
•YO
•nr
• *£
,^-L
^0
.-*>$
-3r
.^
.30
.51
. 10
.zr
•ZSr
•J"L
lo
•2.S"
•lo
.33
•3o
^Y
• 33
•33
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts). "F
5^-MC,
r^?
rsrte
5T$"
^"ST
rrr
%*<-U/
-------
Plant_
Date
t-v
ISOKINECTIC NOZZLE CALCULATION
AND
SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION
Performed by
57'--
Sample Location r
/ --
Test No./Type .?,•' .
AH T
where: N^ = Nozzle diameter (inches)
Average pressure differential across the
orifice meter (in. 1^0)
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Temperature of gas meter, average (°F)
Stack gas velocity pressure (in h^O)
/ ( ) ( + 460) \-25
l( ) ( +460H )/
AH
TS
Tm
AP
Nd
/-> .- -.
i^- • u-*"m
*-r-,*~
- /T'
L;0
VCT
w ~>
"- '2 '.
AH = K (N -r T^ (AP)
Q I
s
where: AH = Pressure differential across the orifice meter (in H20)
Nozzle diameter, actual (
Temperature of gas meter
Temperature of stack gas
inches)
(°F)
(OF)
Stack gas velocity pressure (in H£0)
(( ) ( )4-!—
i \ / i i )
\ ( —
Magic number (
+ 460) ( A
J- 460) l })
)4
Nd
Tm
T5
AP
AH
««d)«
.$<,->
101
•s-«*
IO.-J9-/
3-10
-------
Plant
Date
ISOKINECTIC SAMPLING WORKSHEET
Reformed by_
Sample Location_
Test No./Type
K - 782.687 (Cp)2 (1-BWO)2 Pg Md
K 2 M P
o s m
where: K = Contant of fixed and assumed parameters (dimensionless)
Pitot coefficient (dimensionless)
Water vapor in the gas stream
(proportion by volume)
Absolute stack gas pressure (in. Hg)
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
Orifice coefficient (dimensionless)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole) Md(l-BWQ) + 18(BWQ}
Abolute meter pressure (in. Hg)
782.687 ( )2 (1- )2 ( ) ( )
( )2 ( ) ( )
, "• ^
V " '
Bwo
PS
Md
^.-.-^
KO '"
MS
Pm
K
/• f
' i *•'*
„ — w-^ , *^
/"-- „ C ~
'l~ sT-l~
~~> tf\ /
-r. 3-
•**- I i-~-
,^A J'0
3-11
-------
FJELO DATA
l'' / Of /
I
t-1
ro
Plant
Date
"
Impinger Volumes
Initial Final
Sample Location
Sample Type_
Run Number
Operator
ru>.
Net Gain
4*1.1.
Probe Length and Type tj_'_
Nozzle Size & 1.0. p So
Pitot Coefficient * 1.0. o
Assumed Moisture
o jo /'
11. 5"
Ambient Temperature_
Barometric Pressure
Molecular Weight, Dry, (Mdl
Meter Box Number_
Meter Coefficient
a Factor
'Ate 5^
£-<&-
Static Pressure, (H20) ^Q.f
Filter Number(s) 7
Silica Gel
K =
K(Nd)
4
Leak Check: Initial at
Final at
Pitot Leak Check: at-.
Hg. .01.5 CFM
" Hg, ,t///f CFM
SASS Condensate
Total Volume
x (_
,4 /Tm\
i> (isj
P)
, 3
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Traverse
Point
Number
Gas Heter
Reading
(vm), ft 3
Inlt.^q
3io
^a.C-79
(PM.SSO
Velocity
Head
(aPs),
in. H20
0
.*?-
^L
Orifice Pressure
Differential
UH), in. H?0
Desired
4 lO
Actual
30
Y.70
Temperature °F
Stack
576
*2±
5/7
52±
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
•75'
Gas Meter
In
/ds
/CM
/or
JOS'
AJs
Out
u
Vacujn
in. He .jp
0,
4L-JL
, 7/V
7602/i,i
. ,
-------
Page
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, rain
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm), «
Velocity
Head
(&Pc).
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH). 1n. HzO
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
to
IOS
U
30
3.9Q
0
IQT-
O
?3. ISO
£1H.
co
.30
101
103
/7
57ST
M-(gO
LL
-7
ws-
HMO
/7
103
17
76?
M.I
4, (O
/7
10
M.I?
M
. ?O
_MC_
Run No.
Date
Sampling Location •" (
Cooments:
-------
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, rain
Gas Meter
Reading
Inlt.
Velocity
Head
(APs).
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), in. HjO
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuun
In. Hg
Avg.
.2«JL
<£L
57 /
100
tOJ
101
M./3
M.IO
/OX
/r
SOt
n
1 Oq.OOO
M.13
H-00-'
103
IQtf
17
I
l-«
v.oo
/y
. 8*60
*?<}
_&!£
to
n ). too
3. JO
5 '79
&2_
/CU
II
/1 3,fagQ
3.S.O
'_££_
*(,t In
12.
'15.
330
/£.
\\toMSO
LOG
11'/. 70 6
soy.
Run Ho.
Date
Sampling Location *V
Conments:
-------
Page H of */
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, min
Gas Meter
Reading ,
(vm), ft 3
Velocity
Head
(APS).
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH). In. H?0
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuun
In. Hg
Avg.
D-b"
47
.33
££L
£30
'0'
/ -7
0*0
.33
?.?£)
f?
i^f.
.**3
/at
'7
.33
?. 90
563
^ii.
tc
/32.&00
3.00
•'(V
n
5ot
/£_
/Of
AV.
Run No.
Date
Sampling Location
'I vi i .-
Coimients:
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
Plant r >r--^ i - NNr.^PH-ic, To- Performed by >,fct^-<
Date
Sample Location [T-. if-^ ,\_ , C.-J/A
Test No./Type / V; .£•/$•
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
^^y>b + T^\
Va/VTm + 460/
/(«*•• *ft/fc\iv) + (-l^-;\
r 61 1 1 13'6
]"° \(2W}l\(QH) + 460 /
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
vw std , MiM
vw std + vm sM ^^ + (iz&^
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (X 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
( H x 0.44) + (fe.l x 0.32) + {8^.>4- x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-Bwo) + 18(BWQ), (Q^)( 1-^033.) + 18(PVQ
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
Pstack (1n' H20) (~0^
p + siacK e. (-it^f\ +
*b 13.6 ' [^^' + 13.6
pb
w
m std
Vic
vw std
uin
Md
Ms
Ps
-T.^o
S2.12.V
lHu.3
4>.^Vc*
• CJ71
^^.93
^.^
2\^ +
7602/5/81/Rev 1
3-16
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stark vplnrity (fp<0
.< ,. ,," M./TP- ' ) As-9 + «°
v p; ^V s avg; / P M
y N/ s s
/(sv*-!) + 460
85 19 (- %O }( • -- } 1
J CttAVHafr.nO
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Te + 460)(V,, std + Vm std)
s w m
e vs PS Nd2
17.33 ( + 460)(( ) + ( ))
( )( )( )( r1
Area of stack (ft2) »= 3.1416 f° x-s"5T^-~
»rr2^-144, »(_ ^2-f-144 !*>*—
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - B )Vs A, / 528 \ / Ps \
wo avg j ( TS avg + 460 1 (23.92)
60 (1 - ){ )( )/ 528 \ /(— }\
1 + 460 } \(29.92)/
\~ ~ ' ' \ !
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf )
15.432 V9rams), 15.432 ( }
Vm-td ( }
Emission rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (Qr) C. , 0.00857 ( )( )
" -(std)
Ts
Vs(avg)
9
Nd
%I
AS
^^
QS
cs, %
S(std)
E,
H
— <-T • ;
«vv?l
i **-J j
? ~T
"13.1
,,.„
ro.,,5-
-•-
7602/5/81/Rev 1
3-17
-------
ACUREX
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Sample of:
Sample Date:
Requested By:
I.D. Number: 3c-T73S
Analytical Method:
Date of Analysis:
ci< on.t^e h-%c,
Lab I.D. Number
Component
Analytical Result
t.
Date
3-18
Unit
Form EEC 082 5/81
-------
I SDKINET1C CALCULATIONS - USEPA: M/5 BASIS
DUPONT-MEMPHIS, TN NO.1
RUN NUMBER
DATE OF TEST
OPERATOR
METER VOLUME, CF
METER COEF
BAROMETRIC PRES, HG
DELTA H, IN H20
METER TEMP, DEG F
STACK TEMP, DEG F
CONDENSATE, ML
PERCENT C02
PERCENT 02
PERCENT CO
PERCENT N2
STATIC PRES, IN H20
PITOT COEF
SQRT DELTA P, IN H20
STACK AREA, SQ FT
NOZZLE DIAM, IN
TEST TIME, MIN
MASS PARTICULATE, G
F-FACTOR, DSCF/MBTU
VOLUME, DSCF
WATER VAPOR, SCF
PERCENT MOISTURE
MOLECULAR WT DRY, LB/LB
MOLECULAR WT WET, LB/LB
STACK PRES, IN HG
STACK VELOCITY, FT/SEC
MASS FLOW, DSCFM
MASS FLOW, ACFM
PERCENT EXCESS AIR
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
GRAIN LOADING, GR/DSCF
GRAIN LOADING, GR/ACF
EMISSION RATE, LB/HR-STD
EMISSION RATE, LB/MBTU
1-SASS 1-M5/8
8-25-83 8-25-83
PWK MMM
1107.833
0.397
29.98
2.13
112.3
576.9
2934.9
3.5
7
0
83.5
-0.5
0.79
0.511
19.1
0.744
280
0
0
1,032.749
138.146
0.118
29.8
28.41
29.94
38.10
19,627
43,666
118.984
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
85.889
0.9908
29.98
3.47
103.3
564.7
146.3
9.7
6.9
0
83.4
-0.5
0.79
0.603
19.1
0.367
96
0
0
82.124
6.886
0.077
29.828
28.91
29.94
44.31
24,157
50 , 775
92.145
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
3-19
-------
3.3 SOURCE ASSESSMENT SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) FIELD DATA
3-20
-------
ACUREX CORPORATION
Run I •
Acurex Project No. J?p"n%TV
Field Dates_
P1antJ£o
Sampling Location Go\Lg^ . Mp -CuJ^
Sampling Date SriZT-?^
FIELD CREW
Crew Chief: £AO-C€ C ."
Testing Engineer: J_
2
Engr. Technician: 1
Lab Technician: 1P
^ ' S?~\ OC--P^
Process Engineer: 1
FIELD SAMPLE REFERENCE NUMBERS:
900204 900221
900213 , 900230
900212 900226
900211 900227
900207 900216
900208 900217
900205 900218
900206 ... 900219
900228 900220
7602/5/81/Rev 1
3-21
-------
SflSS OPERATION WORKSHEET
-.. — '1
;- Xf\
CO
O.G
i S
m
f(i-
3-22
-------
FIELD DATA
Paqo
f»
CO
Plant_^j
Date i
Sample Location
Sample Type_
Run Number \
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure. {HgO) ~.S
Filter Number(s) jSH > "55" \
Leak Check: Initial at IQ" Hg, .(sH\ CFM
Final at ifr " Hg...OTlT CFM
Pitot Leak Check: (VkT^
-------
Page rl »' JL
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, mln
Gas Meter
Reading ,
), ft 3
Velocity
Head
in
s
. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), in. HjO
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Impinger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
3PR
562
.5/0
n
I ft
75^-0
CJ
ro
tit
*&,
i/
n
af
AS
tn
•it
M
fO?,i-3
//
po
//
5T.5-
I1-.
£
-r.
Run No.
Comnents:
Date
Sampling Location
^4^-
-------
Page <> of ^_
Traverse
Point
Number
Clock Time
(24-hr)
Clock
Sampling
Time, mln
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vra). «
Inlt.
Velocity
Head
(fiPs),
in. H20
Orifice Pressure
Differential
(AH), In. HgO
Desired
Actual
Temperature °F
Stack
Probe
Implnger
Organic
Module
Oven
Gas Meter
In
Out
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Avg.
D:
tv
Run Mo.
.* /o?- 7
Date <•,/*-' ~'( t^:>,
Sampling Location ; •' » ^ ( \
Co/intents;
U
-------
ISOKINETIC PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET & PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
r • «Me>vt»m^ . —y . Performed by_ ^ "
Plant i\
Date >-;g--f»l
Sample Location (xr.,^,
Test No./Type
T
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Meter volume (std),
™(±\fa*&\
\UATm + 460/
/(21")\/(^i) + (^}\
17'61 \(£m)/y-ii±> + 46<> /
Volume of liquid collected (grams)
Volume of liquid at standard condition (scf)
Vlc x 0.04707
Stack gas proportion of water vapor
vw std , ( )
vw std - vm std ( ) + ( )
Molecular weight, stack gas dry
(Ib/lb-mole)
(% C02x 0.44) + (% 02x 0.32) + (% N2+ % CO x 0.28)
(%5~x 0.44) + (>.0 x 0.32) + fc.r + x 0.28)
Molecular weight, stack gas wet
(Ib/lb-mole)
Md(l-BWQ) + 18(BWQ), 4^9L)(l-jiiiL) + 18(-uy)
Absolute stack pressure (in. Hg)
Pstack (in. H20) -te.ST)
0 + ,SlaCK.l.l ' f ,, - r-^ -1- , „
*b 13.6 » U^JSJ * 13.6
pb
Vm std
vic
vw std
Md
Ms
Ps
JlT-ib*
^o-s^aHi
A-li^.^
» ^v. i H ;„
.((^
an.^
2Sf.^i
^.'l^
7602/5/81/Rev 1
3-26
-------
Temperature stack gas, average (°F)
Stack velocity (fps)
85.49 (C )
v p' x s avg'
85.49 (.«c )( .i/,;
.avg + 460
Vs—M^
460
Total sample time (minutes)
Nozzle diameter, actual (inches)
s(avg)
0
SMC
f». T V
Percent isokinetic (%)
17.33 (Tc + 460)(V std + Vm std)
s w ni
17.33 ( + 460)(( ) + ( ))
%I
r
Area of stack (ft2) *= 3.1416
,rr2-7-144, JT( ' )2H-1
Stack gas volume at standard conditions (dscfm)
60 (1 - BwJVs,un A_ / 528 \ / Ps \
wo av9 s f Ts avg + 460 I (jO?)
60 (1 - __)(_ )( )/ 528 \ / ^-±
+ 460
Particulate matter concentration, dry (gr/dscf)
15.432 Mp(9rarns), 15.432 ( >
Vm,
'std
( )
'(std)
Emission rate of particulate matter (Ib/hr)
0.00857 (Q.) C_ , 0.00857 ( )(
s s(std)
7602/5/81/Rev 1
3-27
-------
3.4 VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) FIELD DATA
3-28
-------
ACUREX CORPORATION
Run
Acurex Project No.
Field Dates ft.. 2 V /g_(g_- %_
Plant^
Sampling Location li»i
Sampling Date
.- Ate/u **!'-; 7>J
Crew Chief:
Testing Engineer: 1
Engr. Technician: 1
Lab Technician:
Process Engineer: 1
819612
819613
81S610
819611
819598
S19599
FIELD CREW
P..
Al A^T-i> /V).
FIELD SAMPLE REFERENCE NUMBERS:
819608
819609
819601
819600
3-29
7602/5/81/Rev 1
-------
CJ
0
Volatile Organic Sampling Sampling Train (VOST) Data Sheet
Plant ,"j>jpr\.i t" rv\i4i> _, r.o
Date .*--' ?;•*?:<
Sample Locatloi
Run No. \
Trap
Set
A
B
C
D
E
F
Sumnary
n [^! 11 f .j> N*' r l «.-*«"• (v\
Trap
I.D.
-iS'
;A
Xf
J>'JA
•<1
,^A
XH-
A A
7
..',f , , .-. s" 1 I
Operator
i \ . i • \ I *i i,: . - >
Barometric Pressure (In, Hg) : , r-/
Ambient Temperature (*F)
Voluoe
Sampled (L)
,,.,
^c.t
•».fl
, -—- -
Temperature (*f)
DGH
^'L
\*-'L
)DX
.,_
Probe
*r.:
1-S(
AL't
Heated
Line
H/
/ A
«.''
'
r'/
V
Tena«
Inlet
L'
-
i 1
6i-
C f
- -
Rotoineter
Setting
Pump
Vacuum
(In. Kg)
I
I
iH>
/
-
•1^"
Leak Rate
LPH at Vacuum
.CVt/ i"
.r .it./ ID"
• t ,L/ jT "
.r.ft/ 41 «
.' >(./ »"•
,r><~L/ t i" "
X
Coments
r-'-^s ;7.c.^
F.ts e..,^.,
,-«,> «.,.>-.,^
^>< i *N •< r *^* ^ ft f —*-
i c . . " •- • ti J
r ''^
...... ' 1.'. i —
-------
3.5 C TO Ce HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS DATA
3-31
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client
. Location
Job No. loin Z^.
/ *
en; 5"*^V-
Injection Date 2-1C-S3 , Time £37'H£'. O, , Instrument IDUAei*,J 'rVo
Recorder/Printout Reference No.
^H- 5^T , Recorder ID ^"irsfc /H*
Purpose of Run CfH.|££ATirtv-> cTTh .
Sample Description j-j^ (afi /?•? IM- (***•*«*
t C 1 LAX* - P,:WT1«0'0 f IL..1 U*.
^-l^^^v^s IC.\ RAL. Al,, ±5"%
SAMPLE RUN
Sampling Method ^^( ^/^ AAL i-lH-M- rVi*vHi ^coTT <;p!Tt>
RT K Are* ^ Peak He^<
F?"^ X ' - ' " '
1 jfiT "*V''/^a*''
• OM- /oA
« 3«3 <3S5*S*» oe>c?5"2 2"^
• ?i. i0*i.5~~ ,po\<*-1'L~
• *Y- //**£_ ,flO«lfc»*'r
//6,J /5"3S*r" •r>vtt>n*+.
s.16" n**iu .Doc^"^^"1"
^'^3 *2k3~) ,00D(a1bl
x /
jht Amount (pt^) Component
XA A>
"^^ /to.ff C,
. T'T (f t^". 3 c x.
^) ;u,s c-3
>""_« / (• . 7 C »
t / r. r"
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client g"PA-/C,HgA . Location
n. Job No.
Injection Date %-Z L>O °o . Detector 22..--)
Temperature Program
SAMPLE RUN
Sampling Method
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
Name
of Operator k
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client r>A/c.-n£.4 . Location
. Job No.
Injection Date g-£«T-fr! . Time H'.M-"'.g") . Instrument IDt/A^f^o^mj
Recorder/Printout Reference No. H cT" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase_
Length , O.D.
, I.D.
Temperature: Injector /32o ^C« Oven _
Temperature Program
, Material
°c, , Detector
Sampling Method j£
SAMPLE RUN
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
C
Name of Operator^
.c:
.• °ate
3-34
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client
& € A . Location
Job No.
Injection Date g-2sT-#3 , Time /KT
Recorder/Printout Reference No. V-(a
Purpose of Run
_t Instrument IDuft£i4Ajc?>tc>
, Recorder ID ?T
. AJo cfcai<7cl CL, -C,
Sample Description
;o/u..c. (
, I.D. f Material 5S
C, Oven
°C. Detector 22.0 °c
SAMPLE RUN
Sampling Method
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
Name of Operator
, Date
3-35
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client gf»A-/we.wi>*>£ Job No. •?oV7;sr:>7f
Injection Date £- Time
Recorder/Printout Reference No.
Purpose of Run (IAI^ «
_, Instrument I __
, Recorder ID «??
Sample Description u-v -
GC CONDITIONS
Amount Injected / &c. . Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used //u'J"
Detector Used: FID * . ECD , FPD » TCD (Current )
Detector Attenuation //)"" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase_
Length ID ' O.D.
Jl , I.D.
Temperature: Injector 320 _jc>t Oven ^
Temperature Program /j/ &
, Material
°C-. Detector g2o °c
Sampling Method
SAMPLE RUN
A-^L, 19 <&•
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
-2r
Name of Operator
K,.
, Date
3-36
-------
GAS CHROMAT APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
C11ent
. Location
c, Job No. -g
Injection Date Sf-?5*-^ . Time iV.W iC . Instrument
Recorder/Printout Reference No.
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client
^Artiu Job No. ng//ho 9V o
Recorder/Printout Reference No. £7 Recorder ID ^C^oA/fr/*
Purpose of Run
AJo
O *"* D I
Sample Description
GC CONDITIONS
i
Amount Injected /g.c , Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used _
Detector Used: FID x . ECD t FPD . TCD (Current
Detector Attenuation ;fl"" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase
Length )n ' O.D. Vb '' . I.D.
Temperature: Injector j
.Material
°C, Oven y^o °C., Detector
Temperature Program >j/>?
Sampling Method ^
SAMPLE RUN
/y-3s—
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
Name of Operator
\^JeLkj-
, Date
19
3-38
-------
GAS CHROMAT APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client g
. Location
- , Instrument
, Recorder ID ^
; Ifo
Sample Description
GC CONDITIONS
Amount Injected J~O f Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used if^-T"
Detector Used: FID x . ECD , FPD , TCD (Current )
Detector Attenuation /p~11 , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase Ptiini>v*j£ £. .
Length iO/ . O.D. V<," . I.D. , Material _
Temperature: Injector A ID °c . Oven / L, n °C » Detector £^o OG-
Temperature Program
Sampling Method
SAMPLE RUN
;v-?
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client &PA-/C.MGA » location SVf>r*/r-AiigAift+<. Job No. ?crr??<-.
* Time f^;
. Instrument
Injection Date g
Recorder/Printout Reference No. 5"S"" Recorder ID
Purpose of Run
Sample Description
GC CONDITIONS
__, Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used /AT"
Detector Used: FID _*_, ECO , FPD , TCD (Current )
Detector Attenuation IQ-" , Amplifier or Range
Amount Injected / £
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase /VtfoA^o^
Length m ' . O.D. !/g" . I.D. , Material
Temperature: Injector
Temperature Program
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client
^g A . Location koPnu-r-mg.w . Job No. •? £'T>
Injection Date """ > Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase
. Solid Phase
Length /o f O.D. V*•'• I.D.
Temperature: Injector 2.20°-^* Oven _
Temperature Program
__, Material
f Detector ?.
SAMPLE RUN
Sampling Method _£>
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
c
pet.
Name of Operator
u..^ o
, Date
3-41
-------
GAS CHROMA: APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client
t Location
. Job No.
Injection Date
Recorder/Printout Reference No.
Purpose of Run £, - C._ /h
^ . Time n: H\ oC « Instrument I
, Recorder ID
Sample Description
GC CONDITIONS
Amount Injected / g^. , Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used _
Detector Used: FID v , ECD , FPD , TCD (Current
Detector Attenuation to ~" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase
_, Material c<;
Length |ox O.D. V*" I.D. ^
Temperature: Injector 3.0.0 °_c_. Oven /f>O °C>« Detector ^22o °c
Temperature Program t)/&.
Sampling Method
SAMPLE RUN
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
if /LA
OXi
Name of Operator
Date
3-42
-------
GAS CHROMAT APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client
. Location rhJ»*u/r-
. Job No.
Injection Date fr-gc-frj . Time |-y?r. .L . Instrument
Recorder/Printout Reference No. fax Recorder ID
Purpose of Run r -rL
Sample Description
Amount Injected / /".
GC CONDITIONS
v
Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used /Mr"
Detector Used: FID * . ECD _ , FPD _ , TCD _ (Current _ )
Detector Attenuation /r,~" _ » Amplifier or Range _
, Solid Phase
I.D.
, Material
Column: Liquid Phase
Length m1 O.D. V*"
Temperature: Injector 23p °
-------
GAS CHROMAT APH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client fffiA/c..*if+. Locationhi?pjwr-/*gMp*k . Job No. -?5"m-" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase
' _• °-D- .'/»• " » I«0.
Temperature: Injector a.3o °c. Oven /fen °C • Detector 220 °C_
Temperature Program
Sampling Method
SAMPLE RUN
/7'7o
RT
Area
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
Name of Operator
., Date
19 21
3-44
-------
GAS CHROMATOGRAPH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client £Pflrc.t*9-A • Location
. Job No.
Injection Date fr-7C-*q . Time
Recorder/Printout Reference No.
Purpose of Run
Instrument
Recorder ID
Sample Description
GC CONDITIONS
*
Amount Injected I cc . Inj- Port or Sample Loop Used XA»,7
Detector Used: FID _*_, ECD , FPD , TCD (Current )
Detector Attenuation /Q~" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase , Solid Phase }><&apAt-tz. ^
Length JO' O.D. \fa" . I.D. , Material
Temperature: Injector ggn °C » Oven / 6>o °C . Detector
Temperature Program
Sampling Method
SAMPLE RUN
RT
Area
,/ X*k r^tta
Peak Height
Amount ( )
Component
XX
c,
Name of Operator
, Date
!T~ 19
3-45
-------
GAS CHROMATOGRAPH OPERATING CONDITIONS AND FIELD LOG
Client r.PA/£»M6A Location
k . Job .No.
, Time
Injection Date %'2C'
Recorder/Printout Reference No. 1M-
Purpose of Run ..
. Instrument ID
. Recorder ID ?
Sample Description Sce
Amount Injected [
GC CONDITIONS
_, Inj. Port or Sample Loop Used
Detector Used: FID * , ECO , FPD , TCD (Current )
Detector Attenuation /Q-" , Amplifier or Range
Column: Liquid Phase
, Solid Phase
°-D-
Temperature: Injector
Temperature Program
; , I.D.
DC, Oven
, Material
°c , Detector
SAMPLE RUN
Sampling Method A*i
RT
Area
Pealc Hefght-
f p' •/
Amount
Component
,05-
•JH-
,5-r
'5-3
c,
a. 2.
'5V
Name of Operator
P
^^t A. ^
.. Date §-2<~ 19 a?
3-46
-------
SECTION 4
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
4.1 Trace Element Analyses
4.2 TCI), GRAV, GC/MS, and IR Analyses of SASS Samples
4.3 GC/MS Analysis of YOST Traps
4.4 Bioassay Analysis Report
4-1
-------
4.1 TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSES
4-2
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Reply to
Instrumental Analysis Division
490 Orchard Street
Golden. CO 80401
SI«Ct HOB
1983
Phone: 303-278-9521
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Re: IAD #97-N312-116-10
Subcontract #SW59159A
Release #12
Analytical Report
Ten samples were received for analysis on December 14, 1983. These
samples were assigned our IAD identification #97-N312-116-10.
Trace element analysis is being performed using spark source mass
spectrometry. Reports will be forwarded upon completion of the analysis.
After appropriate prepartion of each of the samples, arsenic and
antimony were determined using hydride generation atomic absorption
spectrophotometry, and mercury was determined using cold vapor flameless
atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
The results of these determinations are presented in Table No. I and
are reported in parts per million (ppm) on an "as received" basis.
Carbon and hydrogen were determined by an external laboratory in
accordance with the procedures of ASTM, Part 05.05, Method D3178.
The results of these determinations are presented in Table No. II
and are reported in weight percent (wt. %) on an "as received" basis
except sample 900209 which is reported on a dry basis with the moisture
at 107°C also reported.
4-3
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE, SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD. IL 60148 AREA CODE 312 953-9300
BALTIMORE MD . BILLINGS. MT . BIRMINGHAM. AL . BVESVILLE. OH . CHARLESTON. WV . CLARKSBURG. WV - CLEVELAND. *"•****'*"*• °"
™iw«l CO GOLDEN CO . HELPER UT . HENDERSON. K Y . HOUSTON. TX . JASPER. AL . MIDDLESBORO. K V . MOBILE. AL . NEW BETHLEHEM. PA
«W OCEANS !*"%£&£$* ' "LISAOE. CO . P.KEV.LLE. KV . SALINA. UT . SO. HOLLAND. .L . TOLEDO. OH . NO. VANCOUVER. 8.C. CA*.
-------
Table No. I
Sample ID
1) 900204 DM Filter +lum
2) 902175 DM Filter Blank
3) 900217 DM lOym + 3um
4) 900206 DM XAD-2
5) 900205 DM XEAD-2 Blank
6) 900219 DM Impinger 1
7) 900208 DM Impinger 1 Blank
8) 900209 DM CMS Fuel
9) 900220 DM Impinger 2 & 3
10} 900207 DM Impinger 2 & 3 Blank
(ppm -
ank
3
3 Blank
As Received)
Mercury (Hg)
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.02
0.004
0.004
0.02*
<0.0002
0.003
Arsenic (As)
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
0.002
0.007
Antimony (Sb)
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
^0.001
0.003
Table No. II
(Wt. % - As Received)
Sample ID Carbon Hydrogen
1) 900204 DM Filter + lym 13.13 0.09
3) 900217 DM lOum + 3ym 42.67 0.13
8) 900209 DM CWS Fuel 82.56* 5.03*
*Reported on Dry Basis
Moisture
xxxx
xxxx
74.41
If you have any questions concerning these results, please call.
Harold A.ConneTl
Assistant Lab Manager
Robert L. Taylorr-Ph.D.AMngr.
Instrumental Analysis Qiyh'sion
4-4
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Water marked
for Your Protection
F.466
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES. 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITS 210-B. LOMBARD. IUINOtS60l48ASEA CODE 31J 9539)00
INSTRUMENTAL \NALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401. PHONE. JOJ i78-<9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountian View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P. O. No.: Release #12
\
Date: February 3, 1334
Analyst: G. Meagher
Sample No.; 900209
DM CWS fuel
SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No-: 97-N312-116-1C
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Dry Coal Basis
ELEMENT. CONC.
Uranium 2
Thorium 4
Bismuth
Lead 3
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmium
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Hoi mi urn
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Ban" urn
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
CONC.
0.3
2
2
0.9
4
6
23
5
^0.7
2
0.5
STD
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported » ~ Dnm
All elements not detected < ~ '„ PP
MC - Major Component >1000 ppm
ELEMENT
Ruthenium,
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
' O
Approved: v\<-.<
4-5
CONC.
2
1
6
4
17
2
8
8
1
0.6
3
6
8
3
3
MC
6
31
' ^
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
U^r v>«V
CONC.
8
MC
3
270
MC
610
MC
460
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
NR
S
9
5C
NR
INT — Interference
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL Off ICES. I919SOUTH HIGHLAND AV€.. SUITE 210-6, LOMBARD. ILLINOIS60148A«eACOO£312953-9MO
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN. COLORADO80JOI, PHONE: 303278-952!
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
P O No Subcontract #SW59159A
' " " Release #12
Sample No.: 9Q0217
DM 10 pm + 3 um
Date: February 8, 1984
Analyst; 6. Meagher
SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 'AD No..- 97-N312-116-10
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thai 1 i um
Mercury
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi um
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thul ium
Erbium
Holmium
Dysprosium
CONC.
7
13
28
0.4
NR
0.9
2
0.8
0.2
1
0.5
3
4
7
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi um
Praseodymi um
Ceri um
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi um
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
CONC.
0.9
4
1
7
12
8
26
32
330
2
7
5
2
STD
±1
1
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Ni obi um
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromi um
CONC.
12
18
45
41
250
18
30
8
14
5
41
100
84
320
30
MC
20
180
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
120
MC
20
MC
MC
590
MC
600
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
NR
20
87
>440
NR
STO — Internal Standard /> — ^ x-% '"X. *i
NR - Not Reported
All element* not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
0.1 ppm
1000 ppm
Approved: (\ *--
4-6
n~
1 PU-" ?fi
?p
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES. 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AV£.. SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 6014« AREA CODE 1I2953-9JOO
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN. COLORADO 8O401. PHONE. JOJ 27g.»S21
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mounti an View, CA 94039
Subcontract 2SW59159A
P.O. NO.: Release #12
Sample No.: 9Q0204
DM filter + 1 pm
Date:
SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
: February 8,
Analyst: Gw Meagher
IAD No. 97-N312-116-J.O
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium 75
Thorium 91
Bismuth 16
Lead 310
Thallium 10
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten 9
Tantalum 1
Hafnium 5
Lutetium 1
Ytterbium 11
Thulium 1
Erbium 8
Hoi mi urn 10
Dysprosium 16
STO - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected <
MC — Major Component >
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samari urn
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmi urn
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
0.2 ppm
1000 ppm
CONC.
4
13
4
22
32
25
120
180
MC
7
4
1
42
15
STD
3
4
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromine
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
f
Approved: \\£-
4-7
CONC.
12
27
140
93
680
46
82
17
59
38
180
400
140
770
130
MC
43
490
rIL*
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
CONC.
MC
MC
82
MC
MC
400
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
NR
NR
NR
NR
89
710
>600
NR
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
CINF.RAL OFFICES. 1919SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUIH 210-8. LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 AREA COOE 31: 953-9300
Reply tO INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN. COLORADO80401. PHONE: JOi 178.9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
\
: \
•M J -..-\
Date: February 8, 1984
Analyst: Q. Meagher
Subcontract No. SW59159A
p. o. NO.: Release No. 12
SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IA° No.: 97-N312-116-10
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
Sample No.: 900206
DM XAD-2
aEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium 500 PPm
(NT — Interference
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri um
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Chromi um
from sample
Approved: • C-<
4-8
CONC.
2
<0.05
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.2
<0.05
0.2
3
0.5
0.5
<0.05
5
0.2
1
O
7-fr
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
~P Qzc-
ON •'•— ^ ,
CONC.
<0.05
2
<0.05
10
5
10
10
2
3
1
3
5
=50
NR
NR
NR
<0.05
<0.05
NR
y^U
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE SUITE 210-8. LOMBARD ILLINOIS 601+8 AREA CODE ] 12 953-9300
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN. COLORADO 80401. PHONE. 303 278-9521
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
\
.; : \
-' _J '• .
Date:
Subcontract No. SW59159A
p. o. NO.: Release No. 12
Sample No.: 900205
DM XAO-2 Blank
February 3, 1984
Analyst: Q> Meagher
SPARK SOURCE AAASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 'AD No. 97-N312-116-IQ
CONCENTRATION IN PPM WEIGHT
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury fjR
Gold
Platinum *Q.3
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
. Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium 0.1
Lanthanum 0.2
Barium 0.4
Cesium 0.2
Iodine 0.05
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium STD
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Hoi mi urn Rhodium
*Probable contamination
Dysprosium preparation
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported - nc ___
All elements not detected < 0.0& PP^
MC - Major Component >500 ppm
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Ruthenium,
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromi urn
from sample
Approved; \^C_,
4-9
CONC.
0.4
<0.05
0.05
<0.05
0.1
0.2
<0.05
0.1
3
1
35
0.1
5
5
15
'fir**
7
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
r_e^>:
CONC.
0.05
1
O.I
10
10
50
10
5
25
1
5
25
= 15
NR
NR
NR
0.1
0.1
NR
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES. I919SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE.. SUITE itO-8. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 60148 AREA CODE Jl 2 9SJ-9JOO
Reply tO INSTRUMENTALANALYS)SOIVISION.490ORCHAROSTREET.GOLDEN,COLORAOO80401.PHONE: J03278-9S21
" "\
J i \
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Date: February 8, 1984
Analyst.- G. Me a g her
Subcontract #SW59159A
p-°-N°-: Release #12
Sample No.: 900219 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No.: 97-N312-116-1Q
DM impinger 1
CONCENTRATION IN
ELEMENT CONC.
Uranium
Thori urn
Bismuth
Lead 0.1
Thai 1 i urn
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi urn
Rheni urn
Tungsten 0.004
Tantalum <0.001
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thul ium
Erbium
Holmium <0.009
ELEMENT
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europi urn
Samarium
Neodymi urn
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium
Cesium
Iodine
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin
Indium
Cadmium
Silver
Palladium
Rhodium
CONC.
<0.001
<0.001
0.03
<0.001
0.01
<0.002
0.003
0.02
STD
0.003
0.004
Dysprosium
STD — Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported
All elements not detected < 0.001 yg/mL
MC — Major Component >1Q Lig/mL
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Ni obi urn
Zirconium
Yttri urn
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
Approved: \J ^~
4-10
CONC.
0.2
0.004
0.002
<0.001
0.003
<0.001
0.03
0.06
0.003
<0.001
0.005
0.7
1
1
0.04
MC
0.4
MC
Sri •
—•6 l~e^
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
* ^ .3
CU- M
CONC.
0.01
<0.009
<0.001
0.4
0.2
0.9
MC
0.09 .
2
0.03
0.4
MC
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.003
0.02
NR
^
-------
Reply to
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
CENE*Al OFFICES t919SOUTHHICHlANOAVE.SUIT£2IO.B.lOM8ARO ILLINOIS 601*8 AREA CODE 1I2955-9WO
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION. 490 ORCHARD STREET. GOLDEN COLORADO 80JOI. PHONE 30J2:8-<»S21
To: Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
555 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94039
Subcontract #SW59159A
P.O. No.: Release #12
Sample No.: 900208
DM impinger 1 Blank
CONCENTRATION IN
Date: February 3, 193*
Analyst G. Meagher
SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS IAD No..97-N3l2-115-10
ELEMENT CONC.
Urani um
Thorium
Bismuth
Lead
Thallium
Mercury NR
Gold
Platinum
Iridium
Osmi um
Rhenium
Tungsten
Tantalum
Hafnium
Lutetium
Ytterbium
Thulium
Erbium
Holmium
ELEMENT CONC.
Terbium
Gadolinium
Europium
Samarium
Neodymi um
Praseodymium
Cerium
Lanthanum
Barium 0.004
Cesium
Iodine 0.001
Tellurium
Antimony
Tin 0.02
Indium STD
Cadmium 0.002
Silver
Palladium
Rhodi um
Dysprosium "Heterogeneous
STD - Internal Standard
NR - Not Reported Q QQJ /m|_
All elements not detected < ^'
MC - Major Component >10 ug/mL
INT — Interference
ELEMENT
Ruthenium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Zirconium
Yttrium
Strontium
Rubidium
Bromi ne
Selenium
Arsenic
Germanium
Gallium
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cobal t
Iron
Manganese
Chromium
r
Approved: Vj£-
4-11
CONC.
*0.4
0.007
0.001
0.005
0.005
<0.001
0.001
0.01
<0.001
0.007
0.01
0.08
0.01
^
ELEMENT
Vanadium
Titanium
Scandium
Calcium
Potassium
Chlorine
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Silicon
Al umi num
Magnesium
Sodium
Fluorine
Oxygen
Ni trogen
Carbon
Boron
Beryllium
Lithium
Hydrogen
^-(^ M g
' V -t-Vr o
CONC.
<0.001
0.08
0.04
0.2
0.3
0.03 •
1
0.006
0.1
0.1
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.002
0.005
NR
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. SUITE 210-B. LOMBARD. ILLINOIS 6014S • (312) 953 9300
ROBERT L TAYLOR. Ph.D. ^^ PLEASE ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO
MANAGER ^M»W 490 ORCHARD ST.. GOLDEN. CO 80401
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS DIVISION .^nl^LW OFFICE TEL. 13031 278-9521
MayTeTl984
Mr. Christopher Mann
Acurex Corporation
P.O. Box 7555
Mountain View, CA 94039
RE: IAD #97-N814-116-05
Subcontract #SW 59159A
Release # 14
Analytical Report
Five samples, previously analyzed for trace elements by spark source
mass spectrometry, under our IAD identification #97-N312-116-10, were logged
in under our IAD identification #97-N8l4-l16-05 on February 22, 1984.
Fluorine was determined using specific ion electrode methodology. Depending
on the sample type and the amount of sample available, Sulfur was determined either
turbidimetrically or by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. The remaining
elemental analysis was performed using either atomic absorption/emission spectro-
photometry or X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
The results of these determinations are presented in the following tables.
Samples #1, 2 and 5 are reported in micrograms per gram (ug/g) on an "as
received" basis, except #5 which is reported on a dry coal basis. Samples #3 and 4
are reported in micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) on an "as received" basis.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please call.
Harold A. Connell
Assistant Lab Manager
obert L. Tayr,<-fh.D-
-------
Table No. I
(yt.*-As Received)
IAD «97-N814.
Page 2 of J
Parameter
Aluminum (Al)
Barium (Ba)
Calcium (Ca)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
Vanadium (V)
900204
DM filter + 1 urn
4.29
0.13
0.52
0.03 (300
3.07
0.99
0.004
0.23
0.54
0.06
(44 ug/g)
(600 yg/g)
0.30
5.13
0.57
0.04 (400 yg/g)
Table No. II
(Wt.%-As Received)
Parameter
Aluminum (Al)
Calcium (Ca)
Fluorine (F)
Iron (Fe)
Potassium (K)
Lithium (Li)
Magnesium (Mg)
Sodium (Na)
Sulfur (S)
Silicon (Si)
Titanium (Ti)
DM
900217
+ 3
9.19
0.41
£0.01
2.25
0.90
0.009
0.25
0.88
0.06
13.17
0.54
(87 yg/g)
(640 yg/g)
4-13
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
Original Copy Watermarked
, For Your Protection
"=466
-------
IAD #97-N8l4-116-05
Page 3 of 3
Table No. Ill
(yg/mL-As Received)
900219
Parameter DM Implnger 1
Chromium (Cr) 29
Fluorine (F) 19
Iron (Fe) 150
Sodium (Na) 380
Sulfur (S) 4,700 (0.47%)
Table No. IV
,(wg/mL-As Received)
900208
Parameter DM Impinger 1 Blank
Fluorine (F) 0.43
Table No. V
(yg/g-Dry Coal Basis)
900209
Patameter DM CWS Fuel
Aluminum (Al) 7,000 (0.70*)
Fluorine (F) 34
Iron (Fe} 1,700 CO,17%)
Potassium (K) 80
Magnesium (Mg) 200
Sodium (Na) 70
Silicon (Si) 12,800 (1.28%)
Titanium (Ti) 400
Moisture 74.41%
4-14
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
ginai COPY Watermarked
For Your Protection
? 466
-------
4.2 TCO, GRAV. GC/MS, AND IR ANALYSES OF SASS SAMPLES
4-15
-------
AACUREX
-, Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
January 18, 1984
Acurex ID: 8310-004
Client P0#: 307736.72
Acurex/ES (CMEA)
M/S 2-2260
Attention: Larry Waterland
Sample: Memphis, 1 SASS Train; Received 8/29/83
The above samples were analyzed by Level 1 protocol. The XAD and OMC extracts
were combined per your instruction. Organic extracts were also analyzed for
the semivolatile priority pollutants by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
employing a J&W SE-54 30 meter capillary column. The column was held at
30°C for 2 minutes, then ramped at 10°C per minute to 27°C. In addition to
the priority pollutants, other organics including benzo(c)phenanthrene,
dibenzo(c,g)carbazole, 7,12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene, 3-methylcholanthrene,
and perylene were sought employing the computerized library search and manual
interpretation. The assignment and quantisation of these organics is tentative
since analytical standards of these compounds were not available for analysis.
Benzo(c)phenanthrene, dibenzo(c,g)carbazole, 7,12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene,
3-methylcholanthrene and perylene were not detected in any of the samples at
levels above 400 ug per 10 ml of extract.
Submitted by:
GN/VLA/ats
Enclosures
Operations Manager
Viorica Lopez-Avila, Ph.D
Technical Director
4-16
555 Clyde Avenue. P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
.
Corporation
ANALYSIS LABORATORIES
DATA REPORTING FORM
CUSTOMER
CMEA
DATE January 19. 1984
CUSTOMER CONTRACT NO.
RESULTS REPORT TO
ADDRESS
307736.72
ACUREX CONTRACT NO.
TELEPHONE .
SAMPLE ID (CUSTOMER)
SAMPLE ID (LAB)
PARAMPTFR
GRAV
TCO
PAH - Naphthalene
- Others
XAD
i 12
7
1.6, 1.5*
0.05
<0.01
XAD Blk
13
<4
<0.2
<0.01
<0.01
Filter
+ ly
n-30-i
<9
•» _
<0.02
<0.02
3 p +
10 u
11-30-5
<30
„
<0.08
<0.08
-
I UNITS 1
mq/train
mg/train
mq/train
mq/train
* Duplicate Injections
I mil, I I (; <>',! 4 IV.)
ANALYST U. Spdtwagel. C. Ueoman, S.
HbVltWhH --'—'^'"w t >... *{> I (
-------
R REPORT
SAMPLE: 8311-30-2 10 u + 3y
towfcmtai
. fa-'1)
?q7Q
2840
Ifmrnity
<;
M
Anignmwit Comnwntt
r-H flllfsnp weak soectrum
C-H Alkane
•
»•
•
4-18
-------
IR REPORT
jAMPLE: 8311-30-1 Filters + ly
IrranuTY
Comment!
No oeaks
4-19
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
8310-04-12
XAD
*~£*r
2970
Zo^n
2840
1740
1450
1260
tramity
M
<;
M
M
W
W
AttipuiMRt CemnMnti
C-H Alkane
r-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
C=0
CH
C-0
Spectrum is
not strona
•
A1 iphatic
^f
•
4-20
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
8310-04-13
XAD Blk
Ww*M*mfc«
- <-•')
2920
2840
1740
1460
1370
1100
Intimity
S
M
W
W
W
W
Anignmcnt Cemmcnti
C-H Alkane
C-H Alkane
C=0 1
CH [ Tentative
CH i Assignments
C-0 J
Aliphatic
•
<•>-
4-21
-------
4.3 GC/MS ANALYSIS OF VOST TRAPS
4-22
-------
^ ACUREX
'T~ ^ Corporation
Energy & Environmental Division
Acurex/ES
Attention: Carlo Castaldini
September 27, 1983
Acurex ID#: 8309-006
Client P0#: 307736.72
Page 1 of 4
Subject: Analysis of 3 Tenax Traps and 3 Tenax/Charcoal Traps for Volatile
Priority Pollutants and Ally! Chloride.
Enclosed please find the results of the gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric
analyses of the 6 Tenax and Tenax/Charcoal traps from the CMEA tests at
Memphis. Analyses for propylene oxide, ethylene oxide and 2-nitropropane were
not performed due to unavailability of standards. Ally! chloride standard
was not available, however retention time and mass spectrum of compound were
available from a previous project performed recently at Acurex. Analyses were
performed on September 7, 1983.
Results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Analyses were performed according
to procedures in the VOST protocol3. A Nutech desorption unit interfaced to
a Tekmar LSC-2 purge and trap device was used. The GC/MS conditions are
summarized in Table 3.
If you have any questions regarding these analyses, please call.
Prepared bv:
WGH/VLA/ats
William G. Hellier
Staff Chemist
Approved by :
Viorica Lopez-Avila, Ph.D.
Technical Director
a - Draft Protocol for the Collection and Analysis of Volatile POHCs using
a Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) by Envirodyne Engineers, Inc.,
April 1983.
4-23
555 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7555, Mountain View, CA 94039 (415) 964-3200 Telex: 34-6391 TWX: 910-7796593
-------
Acurex/ES
8309-006
Page 2 of 4
Table 1. Percent Recovery of VOA Standards Spiked on Traps
"-^-^^S pi king Level (ng)
Compound ' -~^^^
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Di Chloromethane
1 ,1-Dichloroethylene
1 ,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Dichl orobromotnethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1 ,3-Dichloropropene(trans)
Trichloroethylene
Chi orodi brofnomethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,3-Dichloropropene(cis)
Benzene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
Tetrachloroethylene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachlcroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
-ercent Surrogate Recovery
Toluene-dg
Tenax
50
260
128
114
148
248
160
146
156
142
103
144
130
106
88
200
no
39
101
67
360
67
0
106
17
101
48
51
87
100
219
108
114
120
130
133
131
120
123
96
128
114
116
91
106
103
57
56
59
232
0
11
98
17
96
62
64
89
200
188
157
188
185
116
171
157
157
146
no
174
181
148
95
61
111
59
52
83
157
0
16
no
19
95
48
50
82
Tenax/Charcoal
50
0
146
121
100
210
115
no
108
100
108
121
105
102
105
211
150
106
94
102
164
0
90
165
72
280
94
176
88
100
0
168
134
107
122
106
98
95
85
94
100
103
119
97
100
121
144
117
101
99
0
210
101
94
101
96
84
89
200
0
160
130
100
72
99
101
105
104
no
113
116
144
108
59
135
185
116
123
104
0
250
104
87
106
100
115
95
4-24
-------
Table 2. Test Results
Acurex/ES
8909-006
Page 3 of 4
Test #
Trap ID
Acurex ID
"loromethane
V yl chloride
Ch oroethane
Dichloromethane
Tr&ns-l ,2-dichloroethylene
Chi or reform
1 ,2-L'.'chloroethane
1 ,1 ,1-Trlchloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
1 ,3-Dichloropropene( trans)
Trichloroethylene
Benzene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Concentration (ng/trap)
1A
25
819600
140
ND
ND
694
ND
22
7
38
ND
30
138
586
747
Tetrachloroethylene ) ND
1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Ally! chloride
Trichl orofl uoromethane
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Toluene-dg
15
595
ND
22
ND
ND
78
IB
7A
819601
1010
98
154
673
ND
18
ND
25
ND
53-
13
35
468
ND
38
361
ND
89
ND
3640
92
3A
29
819610
'115
ND
ND
943
ND
8
ND
47
ND
31
104
581
1180
ND
33
953
28
58
ND
241
101
3B
3B
819611
735
159
248
2050
ND
13
ND
84
ND
74
441
81
1000
57
27
755
ND
66
ND
7910
109
4A
24
819598
132
ND
ND
2120
49
16
ND
268
42
43
1370
193
610
ND
4B
36A
819599
.139
ND
ND
2711
24
16
ND
330
40
54
' 1 900
1-7
1530
227
59 55
1450
ND
58
ND
4990
97
1210
ND
44
ND
1970
i
92
1
1
ND - Not detected (Detection limit- 5 ng per trap)
4-25
-------
Acurex/ES
8309-006
Page 4 of 4
Table 3. GC/MS Operating Conditions
• Instrument:
• CcTumn:
• Injector Temperature
• Separator Temperatur
» Carrier Gas:
• Te"pera*L,re Program
• Multiplier Voltage!
• Mass Range:
• Scan Rate:
• Total Scans Acqjired
Finnigan 1020 GC/MS System interfaced with
an INCOS 2300 data system
1 percent SP-1000 on Carbcpack B 60/80 mesh
220°C (for spiking internal standards)
250"C
Helium at 40 ml/min
«5°C (3 min hold) to 250eC (10 min hold)
at 8eC/min
1600V
40 to 250 arcu
3 sec/scan
700
4-26
-------
4.4 BIOASSAY ANALYSIS REPORT
In the following, samples with the prefix "DM" are for these tests.
Samples with prefixes "HR" or "RA" are for other tests performed.
4-27
-------
in BIONETICS 5516 Nicholson Lane Ker,smg-;n Wary'and 20895 301 881-5600-Telex 89-8369
Litton
April 18, 1984
Or. Larry Water!and
Acurex Corporation
485 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, California 94042
RE: Acurex Subcontract No. RB59178A
Release No. 6
Dear Larry:
Enclosed are three bound, and one unbound, copies of the final reports for the
five XAD resin extract samples and six ash samples submitted for testing and
evaluation in IERL-EPA Level 1 Ames/Salmonella mutagenesis and CHO cytotoxi-
city bioassays. All studies were conducted and evaluated under IERL-EPA Level
1 guidelines.
Bioassay of the samples took slightly longer than normal because a phased
testing approach was used with the XAD-2 resin extract samples. This phased
approach involved initial CHO cytotoxicity testing, then preliminary range-
finding Ames tests with only one strain, followed by one or more definitive
Ames assays. By using this approach, we were able to adequately test and
evaluate all samples.
The summary of the bioassay data, the criteria used to evaluate the results,
the critical data upon which the evaluations were based, and a graphic display
of the relative ranking of the samples are presented in the attached tables
and figures.
If you have any questions or comments concerning these reports or future
testing, please fell free to contact me at (301) 881-5600, extension 536.
Sincerely,
LITTON BIONETICS, INC.
,tW~3^
>o4 <3
Robert R. rouog
Environmental Assessment Section
Department of Molecular Toxicology
RRY/mg
Enclosures: Ames and CHO 7330-7346 Reports.
cc: Contracts, LBI No. 20993, 20988
4-28
-------
TABLE 1
BIOASSAY SUMMARY TABLE
Technical Directive or Project No. LBI Project No. 20988 and 20993.
Contract No. EPA No. 68-02-3188; ACUREX Subcontract No. RB 59178A Release No. 6
Health Effects Tests
Sample Identification
Ecological Effects Tests
Aquatic | Terrestrial
Fresh Water /Marine
Notes
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT,
INLET (819369)
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT,
OUTLET (819370)
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT,
TEST 1 (819459)
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT,
TEST 2 (819465)
DM XAD-2 EXTRACT
(900206)
RA BOTTOM ASH,
TEST 1 (819488)
RA BOTTOM ASH,
TEST 2 (819498)
RA CYCLONE ASH,
TEST 1 (819476)
RA CYCLONE ASH,
TEST 2 (819504)
DM FILTER + 1 urn PART.
(900204)
DM 10 ym + 3 urn PART.
(900218)
H
M
H
M .
M
ND
ND
M/H
1 /M
ND
NP
M/H
M
M
H/M
M
ND
ND
ND
ND
L
NO = No Detectable Toxicity
L = Low Toxicity
M = Moderate Toxicity
H = High Toxicity
LBI-0468 R11/80
4-29
-------
TABLE 2
DEFINITION OF TOXICITY CATEGORIES FOR HEALTH EFFECTS ASSAYS
-t*
o
Assay3 Activity Measured
Ames
RAM
CHO
WAT
MEC
(mutagenesis)
EC50
(lethality)
EC50
(lethality)
LD50
(lethality and toxic signs)
Sample
Type
S
AL.NAL
E
S
AL
NAL
E
S
AL
NAL
E
S
AL,NAL
MADd
5
200
5000
1
600
20
1000
1
600
20
1000
5
5
Units
mg/plate
ul/plate
L/plate
mg/ml
Ml /ml
Ml /ml
L/ml
mg/ml
Ml/ml
Ml/ml
L/ml
gm/kg
ml /kg
Range of Concentration or Dosage
High
<0.05
<2
<50
<0.01
<6
<0.2
<10
<0.01
<6
<0.2
<10
<0.05
<0.05
Moderate
0.05-0.5
2-20
50-500
0.01-0.1
6-60
0.2-2
10-100
0.01-0.1
6-60
0.2-2
10-100
0.05-0.5
0.05-0.5
Low Not Detectable
(NO)
0.5-5
20-200
500-5000
0.1-1
60-600
2-20
100-1000
0.1-1
60-600
2-20
100-1000
0.5-5
0.5-5
ND at >5
ND at >200
ND at >5000
ND at >1
ND at >600
ND at >20
ND at >1000
ND at >1
ND at >600
ND at >20
ND at >1000
ND at >5
ND at >5
Standard test abbreviations are as follows:
Ames: Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenesis assay
RAM: Rabbit alveolar macrophage cytotoxicity assay
CHO: Rodent cell clonal toxicity assay
WAT: Acute in vivo test in rodents (whole animal test)
Standard abbreviations for measured endpoints are as follows:
MEC: Minimum effective concentration
EC50: Calculated concentration expected to produce effect in 50 percent of population
LD50: Calculated dose expected to kill 50 percent of population
CS = Solid, AL = Aqueous liquid, NAL = Nonaqueous liquid, E = Extract and/or concentrate of unknown organic content
(use equivalent volume of SASS train gas)
MAD = Maximum applicable dose
-------
TABLE 3
HEALTH EFFECTS CRITICAL DATA SUMMARY FORM8
Contract MO. EPA No. 68-02-3188 Technical Directive or Project No. LBI No. 20988 and site Sampled HR. RA and DM
Acurex Subcontract No. RB 59178A 2Q993
Release No. 6 RAM Cytotoxiclty [EC50)C Rodent Toxicity
Sample Identification
Ames CHOCIonal |
Mutagenlclty Toxicity Viability
[MEC)b [ECsolc Viability Index
ATP /Per
ATP 106 Cells
Toxic Signs4
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT, INLET
819369
HR XAD-2 EXTRACT, OUTLET
819370
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT, TEST 1
819459
RA XAD-2 EXTRACT, TEST 2
819465
DM XAD-2 EXTRACT
900206
RA BOTTOM ASH, TEST 1
819488
RA BOTTOM ASH, TEST 2 '
819498
RA CYCLONE ASH, TEST 1
819476
RA CYCLONE ASH, TEST 2
819504
DM FILTER + 1 \im PART.
900204
DM TO -pin + 3 pro PART.
900218
25f
100
20
137.5
200
> 10000
> 10000
50
500
> 10000
> 10000
11.5f
18.4
35.2
9.35
16.0
>1000
(4000)
1400
>1000
(5000)
>1000
(1200)
140
450
"The assays, observed parameters and evaluation criteria are presented In JERL-RTP Procedures Manual; Level 1 Environmental Assessment
Biological Tests, (EPA Contract No. 68-02-2681, Litton Bionetics, Inc., Kensington, Md. I
°MEC: Minimum Effective Concentration - Lowest concentration for any tester strain giving a mulagenic response.
cECg0: Effective concentration that reduces the observed parameter to 50 percent of the appropriate negative control.
dLDso: The dose lethal to 50 percent of treated animals.
*Toxlc signs are identified In a numbered list In the Level 1 manual. Only the number Is reported here. ,
Concentrations are ug organics per plate for Ames assay and per ml of culture medium for the CIIO assay, values in
parenthesis are extrapolated values.
-------
10,000 ug/ml
NONDETECTABLE
TOXICITY
RANGE
1,000
LOW
TOXICITY
RANGE
100 ug/ml
MODERATE
TOXICITY
RANGE
10 ug/ml
HIGH
TOXICITY
RANGE
1 ug/ml
() RA cyclone ash, test 1 (819476) Extrapolated
<)• RA bottom ash, test 1 (819488) Extrapolated
RA bottom ash, test 2 (819498)
RA cyclone ash, test 2 (819504) Extrapolated
DM 10 urn + 3 ym participate (900218)
DM filter + 1 um particulate (900204)
RA XAD-2 extract, test 1 (819459)
HR XAD-2 extract, outlet (819370)
DM XAD-2 extract (900206)
HR XAD-2 extract, inlet (819369)
XAD-2 extract, test 2 (819465)
f
Figure 1. Ranking of test material toxicity using ECgo
in EPA level 1 CHO clonal toxicity assay.
4-32
-------
500 ug/piate
MODERATE
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
50 |jg/plate
HIGH
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
5 ug/plate
NONDETECTABLE
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
5,000 jig/plate
LOW
MUTAGENICITY
RANGE
RA Bottom Ash, test 1 (819488)
RA Bottom Ash, test 2 (819498)
DM Filter + 1 ym Particulate (900204)
DM 10 um + 3 vm Particulate (900218)
RA Cyclone Ash, test 2 (819504)
DM XAD-2 Extract (90Q206)
RA XAD-2 Extract, test 2 (819465)
- HR XAD-2 Extract, outlet (819370)
- RA Cyclone Ash, test 1 (819476)
HR XAD-2 Extract, inlet (819369)
RA XAD-2 Extract, test 1 (819459)
j
f
Figure 2. Ranking of test material mutagenicity using minimum effective
concentration In EPA level 1 Ames mutagenesis assay.
4-33
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Inunctions on the reverse before completing)
NO
EPA-600/7-86-012b
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4 TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Environmental Assessment of a Coal/Water Slurry
Fired Industrial Boiler; Volume II. Data Supplement
5. REPORT OAT
April 1!
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHORlS)
D. Van Buren and L. R. Waterland
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Acurex Corporation
Energy and Environmental Division
P. O. Box 7555
Mountain View. California 94039
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3188
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
13. TYPE Of REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Final; 7/83 - 4/85
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
is. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES AEERL prOject Officer is Joseph A. McSorley, Mail Drop 65.
919/541-2920. Volume I contains technical results.
is. ABSTRACT
repOrt gjves results of comprehensive emission measurements and
analyses for a 7.6 kg/s (60,000 Ib/hr) water tube industrial boiler firing a coal/water
slurry. Measurements included continuous monitoring of flue gas; quantisation of
semivolatile organics and 73 trace elements; volatile organic sampling train (VOST)
quantisation of volatile organic priority pollutants; EPA Method 5/8 for particulate
and SOx; controlled condensation for SOx; Andersen impactors for particle size dis-
tribution; and grab samples for N2O. Emissions of NOx, SO2. CO, and hydrocarbons
averaged 510, 450, 285, and 1 ppm, corrected to 3% oxygen. Particulate emissions
were 4. 3 g/dscm, and particle size was biased to larger size fractions with over
half of particulate mass at 10 micrometers or greater. Over 90% were 3 micro-
meters or greater. Combustible losses were high with over 40% carbon content in
particulate. Total organic emissions were 15 to 17 mg/dscm with half in the Cl to
C6 range. Naphthalene was the only semivolatile detected.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATl I icId/Group
Pollution
Assessments
Slurries
Coal
Water
Combustion
Water Tube Boilers
Polluation Control
Stationary Sources
Environmental Assess-
ment
13B
14B
11G
21D
07B
21B
13 A
3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report!
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
91
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thilpagt)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 <»-73)
4-34
------- |