I
\
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE  OF  WATER PROGRAMS
PESTICIDE USAGE AND ITS IMPACT ON THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT IN THE SOUTHEAST

-------
             PESTICIDE STUDY SERIES - 8
         PESTICIDE  USAGE  AND ITS IMPACT
           ON THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT
                 IN  THE SOUTHEAST
This study is  the  result of Contract No. 68-01-0118
awarded by the OWPO,  as part of the Pesticides Study
(Section 5 (1) (2)  P.L. 91-224) to Teledyne Brown
Engineering.
For Teledyne Brown  Engineering:
Dr. Robert A.  Baker,  Director, Environmental Sciences
           The EPA Project Officer was:
           Charles D.  Reese, Agronomist
          ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
        Office of Water  Programs Operations
Water Quality and Non-Point Source Control Division
          Non-Point Source Control Branch
                  September 1972

-------
                The Pesticide Study Series *

1    A Catalog of Research in Aquatic Pest Control and
     Pesticide Residues in Aquatic Environments
2    The Use of Pesticides in Suburban Homes and Gardens
     and Their Impact on the Aquatic Environment
3    The Use of Pesticides for Rangeland Sagebrush Control
4    Development of a Case Study of the Total Effect of
     Pesticides on the Environment, Non-Irrigated Croplands
     of the Midwest
5    The Pollution Potential in Pesticide Manufacturing
6    The Effects of Agricultural Pesticides in the Aquatic
     Environment, Irrigated Croplands, San Joaquin Valley
7    The Movement and Impact of Pesticides Used in Forest
     Management on the Aquatic Environment in the Northeast
8    Pesticide Usage and Its Impact on the Aquatic Environment
     in the Southeast
9    The Movement and Impact of Pesticides Used for Vector
     Control on the Aquatic Environment in the Northeast
10   Patterns of Pesticide Use and Reduction in Use as
     Related to Social and Economic Factors
11   Laws and Institutional Mechanisms Controlling the
     Release of Pesticides Into the Environment
* The Pesticide Study Series has been prepared by the Office
  of Water Programs Operations of the Environmental Protection
  Agency.  To date, eleven studies have been prepared.

-------
                  EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Water
Programs of the Environmental Protection Agency and
approved for publication.  Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and
policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, or
does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                             ABSTRACT

             PESTICIDE USAGE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN
               UNITED STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON
                   THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT
       The Southeast is a major agricultural region which accounts for
a significant portion of the total national production of diverse and impor
tant crops.   The pests  which affect these crops are equally varied and
require multiple control methods.  Pesticides are currently the most
important and extensively used controls.  Unfortunately,  they have not
always been wisely employed.  This  has led to deleterious effects, with
the aquatic  environment often serving as the victim.  Since undesirable
effects on lower forms of life may ultimately be carried over to man,
there has been an increasing awareness  that judicious pesticide usage is
essential.   Improved practices,  though eagerly sought, are not always
readily evident  because of gaps in knowledge.
       A critical examination was  made of pesticide usage and its effect
on the aquatic environment in the Southeast.  This report summarizes
many aspects of existing technology, current regulatory statutes and
alternatives.  Literature citations  are supplemented by reports of
actual case studies.  From these findings a number of conclusions are
drawn and recommendations formulated.  Implementation of the recom-
mendations would have marked benefit beyond the Southeast.

-------
                      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This critical review was conducted by an interdisciplinary team.
Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE)  was the prime contractor.
Alabama A & M University (AfeM) examined the agricultural aspects
under a subcontract.

Dr. Robert A.  Baker served as project director.   Other contributors
from TBE and  their assignments were:  route into water, Dr.  M. D.  Luh,
Robert Corbitt; impact and degradation, Dr. Donald Henley, Dr.  Lee
Morin, Nancy Schoper, James Breece; and legislative,  Dr. Richard
Shuford.  S.  K. Love provided liaison and report  draft review.

Dr. Robert R.  Bradford served as project coordinator for A & M.
Other contributors and their assignments were: inventory of uses,
Dr.  Om Parkash Vadhwa; applications,  Dr. Nirmal S. Dhillon; and,
alternatives, Dr.  Govind C.  Sharma and Dr. Baldev S.  Mangat.

-------
                  TABLE  OF  CONTENTS

                           VOLUME ONE

 I.  INTRODUCTION
 II.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
III.  RECOMMENDATIONS

                            VOLUME TWO

IV.  CRITICAL REVIEW
     A.  Pesticide Usage
         1.  Introduction
         2.  Major Crops and Soils of the Southeast
            a.  Crops
            b.  Soils
         3.  Historical Development of Pesticide Usage
         4.  Major Pests and Their Control
         5.  Regional and State Usage of Pesticides
            a.  Regional
                (1) Combined States  Information
                (2) The  Fire Ant Problem
            b.  Alabama
            c.  Florida
            d.  Tennessee
            e.  Kentucky
            f.   South  Carolina
            g.  Georgia
            h.  Mississippi
         6.  Conclusions
         7.  Recommendations
         8.  References
     B.  Application Techniques and Types of Pesticide
         1.  Introduction
         2.  Pesticide Application Methods  and  Equipment
            a.  Sprays
            b.  Dusts
            c.  Granules
            d.  Foams
            e.  Soil Incorporation
         3.  Efficiency of Pesticide Application
            a.  Spraying and Dusting
            b.  Ultra Low Volume Spray
            c.  Droplet Size
            d.  Impingement and Uniformity in Coverage
            e.  Soil Incorporation
                                  11

-------
    4.  Conclusions
    5.  Recommendations
    6.  References
C.  Route of Pesticides into Aquatic Environment
    1.  Introduction
    2.  Properties of Pesticides
    3.  Sorption-Desorption Phenomena
    4.  Movement into Water
       a.  Direct Application
       b.  Overland Drainage
           (1)  Soil Erosion
           (Z)  Irrigation
       c.  Atmospheric Processes
           (1)  Volatilization
           (2)  Dusting  and Spraying
           (3)  Windblown  Materials
       d.  Disposal Processes
    5.  Case Studies
       a.  Intentional
       b.  Accidental
    6.  Conclusions
    7.  Recommendations
    8.  References
D.  Impact of Pesticide Pollution on the Aquatic Environment
    1.  Movement of Pesticides by Aquatic Organisms
       a.  Direct Uptake
           (1)  Plant
           (2)  Invertebrates
           (3)  Vertebrates
       b.  Indirect  Uptake Through Food  Chain
           (1)  Plant - Animal  Chain
           (2)  Animal  - Animal Chain
    2.  Impact of Pesticides on Aquatic Populations
       a.  Short-Term Effects
       b.  Long-Term Effects
           (1)  Population  Changes
           (2)  Physiology and  Reproduction
    3.  Synergestic  Effects
       a.  Physical Synergisms
       b.  Biological Synergisms
    4.  Health Implications of  Pesticide Contaminated Water
       a.  Contamination  of Potable Water Supplies
       b.  Ingestion via Food  Products
    5.  Conclusions
    6.  Recommendations
                             111

-------
    7.  References
E.  Degradation of Pesticides in the Aquatic Environment
    1.  Introduction
    2.  Degradation Mechanisms, Rates and Products
       a.  Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
       b.  Organophosphates
       c.  Carbamates
       d.  Herbicidal Compounds
       e.  Inorganic  Pesticides
    3.  Physical Influences on Degradation
       a.  Adsorption
         1  (1)  Chemical Reactions
          (2)  Biological Degradation
          (3)  Cycling (Physical)
       b.  Translocation
           (1)  Reservoir
          (2)  Estuaries
          (3)  Closed-Water Systems
    4.  Biological Degradation
       a.  Microbiological
       b.  Plants
       c.  Animals
    5.  Degradation Effects
       a.  Water  Quality
       b.  Toxicity
    6.  Conclusions
    7.  Recommendations
    8.  References
F.  Applicable Regulations and Laws Governing Pesticides Use
    1.  Introduction
    2.  Scope of Local Laws and Regulations
       a.  Registration
       b.  Application and Use Controls
       c.  Residue Detection
    3.  Effectiveness of Current Local Statutes
    4.  Assessment of Important Litigation
    5.  Conclusions
    6.  Recommendations
    7.  References
G.  Alternatives  to Pesticides  in Southeastern United States
    1.  Introduction
    2.  Cultural Methods of Pest Control
       a.  Cultural Control of Southwestern Corn Borer
       b.  Cultural Control of Cotton  Pests
           (1)  Insect Control
           (2)  Disease and Nematode  Control
           (3)  Weed Control
                             IV

-------
3.  Physical and Mechanical Methods of Pest Control
   a.  Inactivation of Plant Pathogenic Viruses by Vegetatively
       Propogated Plant Materials
   b.  Disinfection of Plant Parasitic Nematodes by Heat
   c.  Use of Light Traps in Insect Control
4.  Use of Resistant Varieties of Crop Plants
   a.  Wilt Resistance in Tobacco
   b.  Varietal Resistance to Cotton Pests
   c.  Control of Cyst-Nematode in Soybeans  by Resistance
   d.  Breeding Vegetable and Fruit Crops for Resistance to
       Diseases
   e.  Disease  and Insect Resistance Research for Southern
       Forest
   f.  Insect Resistance to Corn Earworm
   g.  Resistance to Potato Leaf Hopper
5.  Biological Agents for Pest Control
   a.  Biological Control of Red Scale and Purple State in Florida
   b.  Biological Control of Cotton Bollworm  and Tobacco Budworm
       in Mississippi
   c.  Control of Pea Aphid by Aphidius Smithi in Kentucky
   d.  Introduced Wasps for the Control of Gypsy Moth in Alabama
   e.  Field Control of Nantucket Pine Tip Moth by the Nematode
       DD-136 in  South Carolina
    f.  Heliothis Control  With Virus
   g.  Integration of the  Heliothis  Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus into
       a Biological Control Program on  Control in Mississippi
   h.  Two-Spotted Spider Mite  Control  With Fungus in Alabama
   i.  Control of Aquatic Weeds by the Snail in Florida
   j.  Biological Control of Alligator weed with Flea Beetle in
       Southeastern States
   k.  Control of Pond Weeds by the Use of Herbivorous Fish
6, Sterility Approach to  Insect Control
   a.  Eradication Program of the Screw Worm Fly in the South-
       eastern States.                        ;
   b.  Eradication of the Cotton Bollworm from St.  Croix,  U. S.
       Virgin Islands
   c.  Eradication of Cotton Boll Weevil in the Southeast
   d.  Control of House Flies With Chemosterilant Baits in Florida
   e.  Preliminary Work With Chemosterilants for Important
       Noctuids in Georgia.                           t
7.  Insect Attractant and  Repellants
   a.  Use of Synthetic Attractants in Control and Eradication
       of Mediterranean  Fruit Fly in Florida
   b.  Synthetic Pheromone of the Boll Weevil
   c.  Virgin Female Traps for Introduced Pine Sawfly
   d.  Sex Pheromones of the Southern Pine Beetle and Other
       Bark Beetles.

-------
       8.  Insect Hormones
       9.  Integrated Control
          a.  Integrated Control of Cotton Boll Weevil in Southern States.
          b.  Integrated Control of Heliothis
          c.  Integrated Control System for Hornworms on Tobacco  in
              North Carolina
          d.  Integrated Control of Muscid Flies in Poultry Houses in
              Kentucky
          e.  Integrated Biological and Chemical Control of Aquatic
              Weeds in Florida.
      10.  Miscellaneous Methods
          a.  Seed Laws
          b.  Seed Certification
          c.  Disease Control Through Virus Free Stock
          d.  Quarantine and Regulatory Controls
          e.  Pest Surveillance
           f.  Genetic Manipulations
          g.  Development of Safer Pesticides
       11.  Conclusions
      12.  Recommendations
      13.  References
V.  APPENDIX
                                 VI

-------
PESTICIDE USAGE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN
  UNITED STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON
      THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

                Volume I

-------
                          PART I.  INTRODUCTION
       This critical review examines pesticide usage and its impact on
the aquatic environment in the Southeast: Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina,  South Carolina and Tennessee.
The study is one of a series authorized and required by Section 5 (1) (2)
of Public Law 91-224.  The southeastern United States is one of the oldest
and major agricultural sections of the country.  A variety of climatic
gradations from temperate to subtropical exist.  Diverse soil types  are
also characteristic of this  region.  These characteristics allow for pro-
duction of diverse  crops.   Of the  total national production of tobacco,
citrus, peanuts, pecans,  cotton and vegetables approximately 85%, 65%,
61%, 28%, and 12%, respectively, are produced in the Southeast.   In
addition, peaches,  corn and soybeans are important crops.  These
crops  serve as  hosts and are infested by a variety of pests and conse-
quently require the use of multiple  control methods for economic pro-
duction. Pesticides are currently the most important control method
and are  used  extensively.   New hybrid varieties with high production
characteristics, monoculturing of crops and minimum tillage practices
have further increased the need for pesticides.   Eventually these pesti-
cides may enter the aquatic environment.  It is to assess the resulting
effects, to indicate  gaps in the existing knowledge, and to recommend
corrective measures that  this study is dedicated.
        Perhaps the most important factor determining the eventual entry
of pesticides  into the aquatic environment is the application technique.
Efficient control depends upon the selection of the correct pesticide,
application  at the proper time and the use of equipment that can most
efficiently place the toxicant in the microenvironment of the pest.  Of
                                                       2
the total pesticide applied, no more  than 2% is effective.   The remai
der is indicative of the inefficiency of existing application techniques.

-------
Careful selection of existing application techniques would considerably
reduce the amount of toxicant required for effective pest control; with a
concommitant decrease in contamination of the ecosystem.  Major bene-
fits would accrue from improved pesticide delivery systems.
       An understanding of the movement of pesticides from application
to entry  into the aquatic environment involves physical,  chemical and
biological considerations of the pesticide,  the application process,  and
the air,  soil and aquatic systems!7"9 Overland drainage,  irrigation return
flows, atmospheric transport, intentional dumping and accidental spills
        .   , 7,10-13
are involved.
       Once pesticides enter the aquatic environment they may exert
short-term or long-term detrimental effects.  Biological organisms con-
                                                          14,15
centrate pesticides through direct and indirect mechanisms.  '   The mecha-
nisms result in biomagnification  with each successive step in the food
chain.  Short-term effects or acute toxicities are reflected environmentally
as "kills".   The toxic concentrations required to produce kills are,  in
certain instances, considerably less than laboratory established LCgQ
(median lethal concentration) values.    Long-term effects include sub-
tle alterations in predator-prey relationships,  decreased floral and faunal
fecundity and specific physiological alterations which reduce the ability of
                                             17-19
organisms  (target and non-target) to compete.       Synergistic effects occur
in biological organisms when pesticides act in combination with other biolo-
gical, physical or chemical factors.   '    Two or more  contaminants or a
single contaminant together  with  a naturally occurring material may react
to give an effect far greater than the sum of their individual effects.  This
is an especially important consideration in Southeastern waters.  These
waters are rich in organic matter which tends to complex with normally
                                                        22
insoluble chemical substances such as certain pesticides.     The com-
plexed material is readily distributed within the aquatic environment.

-------
This increases the opportunity for exposure to and concentration by aquatic
life forms.  Eventually this constitutes a health hazard to man via contami-
nated water and food.
        The degradation of  certain pesticides may lead to even more toxic
                  25,26
reaction products.    Others may either  degrade to harmless products or
remain unaffected.   The surface waters of the Southeast often contain  chlo-
                                         27
rinated hydrocarbons and other pesticides   that are persistent and resist
biological or chemical degradation.  Degradation of other pesticides is
affected by many  factors.  They may be in solution,  associated with sus-
pended matter,  or entrained in sediment.  Each of these  aquatic  compart-
ments is characterized by  a unique combination of biological and chemical
interrelationships which may modify the degradation process.  Most avail-
able information on pesticide degradation mechanisms and rates  has been
obtained, chiefly, through  laboratory study.  Extrapolation of such results
to field conditions is not valid because of the complicating effect  of environ-
mental and other  factors.
        Public concern for  the environment  challenges the efficiency and
effectiveness of our  form of legal  and administrative framework.  Among
the concerns is adequacy and effectiveness  of existing state statutes regu-
lating the sale and use of pesticides.  The provisions of the Federal

                                                                   29
                                          28
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,   (FIFRA) as amended and
the Miller Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,
as amended, provide the foundation for a comparative analysis of the pesti-
                                                             30       31
cide laws and regulations of the Southeastern states: Alabama,  Florida,
        32         33           34              35              36
Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
            37
Tennessee.     State laws regulating pesticides fall into three classifica-
tions.   These are statutes:
        •  requiring economic poisons to be registered,
        •  governing pesticide application and use controls, and
        •  providing for tV>«^ detection of pesticide residues on crops.

-------
Four factors serve as indicators of effectiveness.  These are:
       •   adequacy of statutory authority to control areas of potential
           abuse of public health and the environment,
       •   relative economic burden imposed on the private sector by
           the statutes to achieve compliance,
       •   relative ease of public administration,  and
       •   the ecological sensitivity of present statutes.
       Many methods of pest control have been advanced as knowledge of
biology,  ecology and agriculture increases.  Within the last three decades,
overemphasis on the use of pesticides  has caused unintentional side effects
and provided only a temporary solution to the pest control problem.  In
many cases pest control,  with minimum damage to the environment, can
be  achieved by  alternative procedures.  These could utilize proper agri-
cultural management, physical,  genetic, biological and nonhazardous
                                                                    38
chemical methods.  Eradication of the screwworm from the Southeast
by male sterilization techniques  is an example of a successful alterna-
tive.

       Parts II and III summarize the  conclusions and specify recommen-
dations derived from the critical review, respectively.  The detailed
findings,  analyses and other supporting information are contained in
Part IV.   This is divided into seven study areas:
       •   Pesticide Usage
       •   Application Techniques
       •   Route into Aquatic Environment
       •   Impact of Pesticides on the  Aquatic Environment
       o   Degradation of Pesticides
       •   Regulations and Laws
       •   Alternatives
A comprehensive bibliography is appended to each of the  study areas.

-------
                               References
 1.  Agricultural Statistics,   United States Department of Agriculture,
    U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D. C. ,  1970.

 2.  Metcalf, R.  L.,  Primer on Agricultural Pollution.  A Publication of
    Soil Conservation of America,  14-17, 1971.

 3.  Himel, C. M. ,  The Optimum Size for Insecticide Spray Droplets,
    J. Econ.  Entomol. ,  62,  919-925, 1969.

 4.  Himel, C. M. ,  New Concept in Application Methodology,  Southeast
    Forest Insect Workshop, Charleston, South Carolina, 1-9, 1970.

 5.  Williamson,  R.  E. ,  Progress Report--Soil Incorporation of Pesticides,
    South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station,  Clemson University,
    Clemson,  South  Carolina,  1966.

 6.  Isler,  D. A. , Methods for Evaluating Coverage and Drop Size in
    Forest Spraying, Trans. American Society of Agricultural Engineers,
    6_, 231-233,  1963.

 7.  Bailey, G. W. ,  Entry of Biocides into Water Courses, Proceedings
    of Symposium on Agricultural Waste  Waters, Water  Resources  Center,
    University of California, Davis,  California,  Report No.  10,  94-103,
    1966.

 8.  Kunze, G. W. ,  Pesticides and Clay Minerals,  Pesticides and Their
    Effects on Soils  and  Water, Soil Science Society of America, Inc. ,
    Madison, Wisconsin, 49-71, 1966.

 9.  Bailey, G. W. and White,  J. L., Review of Adsorption and Desorption
    of Organic Pesticides by Soil Colloids,  With Implications Concerning
    Pesticide Bioactivity, J. Agr.  Food Chem. , 12,  324-332, 1964.

10.  Hindin, E. ,  May, D. S. , and Dunstan,  G. H. , Collection and Analysis
    of Synthetic  Organic Pesticides from Surface and Ground Water, Resi-
    due  Reviews, 7, 130-156, 1964.

 11.  Abbott, D. C.,  Harrison,  R. B. , Tatton,  J. O'G. , and Thomson,
    J. ,  Organochlorine Pesticides  in the Atmosphere, Nature,  211,  259-
    261, 1966.

-------
12.  Barthel, W.  F. ,  Hawthorne,  J.  C. ,  Ford, J. H. ,  Bolton, G.  C. ,
    McDowell, L. L. , Grissinger, E. H. ,  and Parsons, D. A., Pesticides
    in Water, Pesticide Monitoring J. , 3, 8-66, 1969.

13.  Bugg, J. C., Jr., Higgins, J. E. , and Robertson,  E.  A., Jr.,
    Chlorinated  Pesticide Levels in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea,
    Virginia) From Selected Areas of the South Atlantic and Gulf of
    Mexico, Pesticides Monitoring J. , JL, 9-12, 1967.

14.  Ferguson, D.  E. and Goodyear,  C. P. ,  The Pathway of Endrin  Entry
    in Black Bullhead, Ictalurus melas,  Copeia, 1967,  467-468,  1967.

15.  Chadwick, G.  C. and Brocksen,  R. W. , Accumulation of Dieldrin by
    Fish and Selected Fish-Food Organisms, Journal of Wildlife Manage-
    ment, 33, 693-700, 1969.

16.  Report of Fish Kill Investigation in Lake Junaluska, Haywood County,
    Dept. of Water and Air Resources, Water Quality Div.  , North Carolina,
    Nov. 1970- Mar. 1971.

17.  Wurster, C. F. , DDT Reduces Photosynthesis by Marine  Organisms,
    Science, 159,  1474-1475, 1968.

18.  Goldberg, E.  D. ,  Butler,  P.,  Meier, P., Menzel, D.  , Risebrough,
    R.  W.,  and Stickel,  L. F. , Chlorinated Hydrocarbons  in the Marine
    Environment,  National Academy of Sciences,  Wash. , D.  C. , 1-21,
    1971.

19.  Lane, C. E. and Livingston, R.  J., Some Acute and Chronic Effects
    of Dieldrin on the Sailfin Molly, Poecilia latipinna,  Trans. Am. Fish
    Soc. , 22'  489-495, 1970.

20.  Lincer, J.  L. , Solon, J. M. , and Nair, J. H. , DDT and  Endrin Fish
    Toxicity Under Static vs. Dynamic Bioassay Conditions, Trans. Am.
    Fish. Soc.,  99,  13-19, 1970.

21.  Macek,  K. J. , Hutchinson, C. and Cope, O.  B. ,  Effects  of Tempera-
    ture on the Susceptibility of Bluegills and Rainbow Trout to Selected
    Pesticides,  Bull. Environ. Contam. & Toxicol. , 4, 174-183, 1969.

22.  Bartha, R. , Fate of Herbicide -Derived Chloroanilines in  Soil, J. Agr.
    FoodChem.,  19, 385-387, 1971.

23.  Report of the Secretary's Commission on Pesticides and Their Relation-
    ship to Environmental Health, Parts I and II, U. S. Department of
    Health,  Education and Welfare,  U. S.  Government Printing Office,
    Wash.,  D.  C., 99-123, 1969.

-------
24.  Schafer,  M. L. ,  Peeler, J.  T. , Gardner,  W. S. and Campbell, J. E.,
     Pesticides in Drinking Water:  Waters from the Mississippi and
     Missouri Rivers,  3, 1261-1269,  1969.

25.  Lamberton, J. G. and Claeys, R.  R. , Degradation of 1-Naphthol in
     Sea Water, J. Agr.  Food Chem. ,  18, 92-96, 1970.

26.  Georgacakis,  E.  and Kahn, M.  A.  Q. ,  Toxicity of Photoisomers of
     Cyclodiene, Insecticide of Freshwater Animals,  Nature, 233, 120-121,
     1971.

27.  Cleaning Our Environment: The Chemical Basis for Action,  A Report
     by the Subcommittee on Environmental Improvement, Committee on
     Chemistry and Public Affairs,  American Chemical Society, Wash.  ,
     D. C., 212-213, 1969.

28.  Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, (61 Stat. 163;
     7 U. S.  C. 135-135K) June 25,  1947.

29.  Federal Food,  Drug and Cosmetic  Act,  Miller Amendment, (Sec. 404
     (d) (2), 68 Stat.  512; 21 U.  S. C.  346a (d) (2)), 1959.

30.  Insecticides, Fungicides, and Other Economic Poisons, Article  20,
     Title 2, Section 337, 1958, Recompiled Code of Alabama,  1951.

 31.  Florida Pesticide Law, Chapter 487,  1953 (Revised).

32.  The Georgia Economic Poisons Act, Georgia Laws 1950, pg. 390 and
     Georgia Laws 1958,  Pg.  389,  1949.

33.  Kentucky Economic  Poison Law, 1956.

34.  Mississippi Economic Poisons Act, Chapter 509, Senate Bill No. 2145,
     Laws of Mississippi 1971, 1950.

35.  North Carolina Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act of 1947.

36.  South Carolina Economic Poison Law, 1953.

37.  Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Law (Pesticide Act) Tennessee
     Code Annotated,  Title 43,  Chapter 7,  Sections 43-701-703  as amended,
     1951.

38.  Knipling,  E.  F. , Use of Organisms to Control Insect Pests,  J.
     Environ. Quality, V, 34-40, 1972.

-------
               PART II.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

       Most pesticides used in the southeastern United States are directed

towards the following major pests:

       •   Insects:  Cotton boll weevil, cotton bollworm, tobacco bud-
           worm,  tobacco hornworm, scale insects of citrus, cabbage
           hopper, pink bollworm, codling moth and mealy bugs.
       •   Weeds:  Broad leaf weeds, rag weed, Johnson grass, pigweed,
           crab grass,  barn-yard grass,  green and yellow foxtail,  water
           hyacinth and goose weed.
       •   Disease: Citrus melanose,  citrus and apple scab,  leaf spot
           disease of peanuts,  wild fire of tobacco and cotton, anthracnose
           of tobacco and cotton, root rots  of corn, fire blight of apple,
           downy mildew  of beans, and leaf spot of apples, beans and
           cotton.
       An accurate inventory of pesticides usage is presently not obtain-

able because distributors, sellers or users of pesticides are not required

to report specific information to any responsible agency regarding  pesti-

cides sold or applied.  The most recent information available from U. S.

Department of  Agriculture concerning quantities of pesticides used by

farmers on a regional level is five years old (1966).   Certain information

is available for pesticide  usage in a few states (e. g.  Kentucky and

Tennessee) where special surveys were conducted.  These surveys repre-

sent only a one year compilation.  Recommended application rates for
the different pesticides are available for  all states.

       In the Southeastern states, the most widely used insecticides are

Toxaphene, Aldrin,  Chlordane and DDT.   Use of Parathion and Malathion

is increasing.  The most commonly used are Treflan, Dalapon, 2,  4-D,

Atrazine.  Sulfur compounds,  copper sulfate,  Thriam,  Maneb,  and Zineb

constitute the major fungicides used.  Insecticide applications to cotton

exceed the combined total for all other major crops.  A similar situation
exists for fungicides applied to citrus.

-------
       Practically all Southeastern soils used for agricultural purposes
are subject to moderate or severe runoff and erosion.  Soils in most of
Florida are an exception because lack of adequate drainage is a  severe
problem.
       Presently,  63 percent of all pesticides are applied by aircraft.
The remainder is applied with ground equipment.  Most pesticides are
applied as sprays, either to the plant foliage or to the soil surface.
Some pesticides  are incorporated in the soil.  To minimize  contamination
of the  ecosystem by pesticides,  improvement in spray application and
soil incorporation equipment is required.

       Pesticide usage could be significantly reduced and still provide
an effective pest control program if the pesticides are uniformly distri-
buted and the major portion reached its intended target.   The initial
problem is to atomize relatively non-volatile pesticide formulations  into
uniformly sized droplets which are sufficiently numerous that the pest
cannot avoid contacting a lethal dose.  The second problem involves
deposition of small particles or droplets on the target.  One of the
methods that could improve deposition of pesticides is electrostatics.
The third problem involves incorporation or injection of some soil-
applied pesticides.  These processes involve  optimum depth considera-
tions.  All of these problems merit intensive  research and development.

        The efficiency of a spray application is related to optimum drop-
let size, uniformity in spray coverage produced, and degree to which
drift and runoff is  minimized.  Ninety percent or more of spray droplets
produced by existing aerial and ground equipment are not of the  optimum
size.  This portion of the spray constitutes the major source of  pestici-
dal pollution.
       After two decades of intensive use, pesticides are found  through-
out the world.  They are present in the aquatic environment and in the
atmosphere, even  in places far from any spraying sites.  The persistent

-------
nature of certain pesticides permits them to be carried from the air and
soil into the aquatic environment.   There they can move from one organism
to another via the food web or be cycled in the aquatic environment.
       Physical and chemical properties of pesticides  govern their  move-
ment from one system to another.  Sorption and desorption are the pro-
cesses which limit the rate  of movement of pesticides from the soil into
the aquatic environment.  Specific sorption and desorption mechanisms
for each pesticide under environmental conditions are not known.  These
mechanisms are influenced by the clay and organic content, temperature,
degree of cation saturation within the soil, and by climatic conditions.
These factors also influence pesticide sorption-desorption at the benthic
level of the aquatic  environment.
       Pesticide movement into the soil environment is influenced by
sorption, thermal and biomass characteristics,  and  general  chemical
composition. Knowledge of the chemical and  physical nature of pesti-
cides, facilitates a  prediction of their fate.  Common fates in the soil
environment are sorption and desorption,  photo-and  oxidative decompo-
sition, hydrolytic and biochemical degradation, leaching, and phyto-
assimilation. Organic matter favors sorption of both non-ionic and  ionic
pesticides.  The soils  of the Southeast are characterized by high clay
content and primarily sorb ionic pesticides.   Many of the pesticides
applied to the soil are  strongly sorbed and do not percolate through  the
soil.  Pesticides normally are confined to the top few inches  of the soil
       Pesticides in the soil are generally in contact with water.  The
quantity of water may significantly alter their reactions.  For example
phytoactivity is  greatly enhanced in moist soil.  Solubilities,  partitioning
(soil, water, and air), and interaction of these properties alter the reac-
tions of individual pesticides.
       The sorption process and its binding power must be examined re-
lative to leaching.  Leaching of pesticides deserves greater attention
                                  10

-------
because this is the process of most rapid movement from the soil into
the aquatic  environment.
        The direct movement of pesticides from the  soil surface to a
waterway requires consideration of climatic conditions before, during,
and after  application.  Principal consideration should be given to volatili-
zation losses,  movements into the soil,  persistence at the site of appli-
cation, and movement of the remaining fraction to uncontaminated areas.
        Pesticides move into the aquatic environment from the land even
though universally present in the air.  Movement from land may take
several forms but overland drainage is the most significant.  Good con-
servation practices reduce overland drainage.  The occurrence of pesti-
cides in waterways  is primarily attributed to their sorption by runoff
particles.   Deposition and subsequent desorption of the sorbed particles
will provide a continuous source of pesticide to the  aquatic environment.
        Considerations should be given to rainfall as a climatic factor
influencing pesticide movement into water.  Pesticides movement into
and over the soil is of a uniform nature during periods of low rainfall
intensity.   This  also occurs during overhead and flood irrigation practices.
High rainfall intensity and furrow irrigation,  however, produce dispro-
portionate pesticide movements. This movement can result in waterway
contamination.
        Pesticides enter the soil environment through mechanical in-
corporation or infiltration processes.  Incorporation (or induced turn-
over) is favored since it reduces atmospheric and runoff contamination.
However, plant uptake and persistence of pesticides are increased.
        Information on pesticide decontamination is  needed.  Sorption by
activated carbon is  the only method presently available for removing
pesticides from water.  However, suitable methods for disposal of the
sorbed materials has not been developed.  Thermal, photochemical and
biological degradation are considered as possible decontamination methods
                                  11

-------
in instances where concentrated pesticides occur.  Photochemical, bio-
logical and sorption processes offer potential for removal of low-level
concentrations in waterways.
        Current agricultural application practices result in contamination
of :he aquatic environment through atmospheric processes.  Those pro-
cesses which contribute to contamination include volatilized fallout and
washout,  drift from dusting and spraying operations, and wind-blown,
pesticide-treated soils.  Other aerial or atmospheric routes include
incineration of pesticide-contaminated materials and direct application
of pesticides into the aquatic environment.
        Case studies have documented that runoff,  accidental spills,  and
intentional pesticide dumping are prevalent means of entry into the aquatic
environment.  Non-selective toxicity and subtle long-term effects  can
create ecological imbalances.  Therefore, there is an urgent need to use
existing and safer pesticide alternatives, to better educate pesticide
users regarding potential hazards,  and to limit usage of persistent pesti-
cides.
        Aquatic vegetation can sorb large quantities of pesticides.  These
sorbed substances can be metabolically degraded or stored.  The stored
compounds may either become part of a food web or be returned to the
sediment.   Information is not available  on sorption capacities and  degra-
dation of pesticides by aquatic vegetation of the Southeast.  Fish and
filter-feeding sedentary invertebrates sorb pesticides directly from the
water. Residue levels closely correlate with surface water concentra-
tions, which relate to seasonal agricultural practices and rainfall
        Pesticides such as  DDT, Dieldrin,  Endrin,  Toxaphene,  Mirex
and BHC are bioconcentrated.  Food chain studies have been primarily
focused on DDT without regard for other stable chlorinated hydrocarbons
Herbicides,  in general, are less toxic to fauna than other pesticidal cate
                                  12

-------
This is attributed to the fact that these compounds degrade rapidly and
do not bioconcentrate.  The effects of herbicides on nontarget aquatic
plant communities have not been specifically identified.  However, it is
known that the reduction of consumer populations  is accompanied by a
shift in plant species to hardier algae that are not consumed by grazers.
        Considerable emphasis has been placed on testing fish for  acute
toxicity.  Acute toxicity levels have been established for several indivi-
dual species under laboratory conditions.  These  values  serve only as
quantitative indices of toxicity under specific  conditions and do not reflect
accurate responses under varying natural environmental conditions.
There is a need for toxicological information  on lower life forms obtained
under dynamic test conditions.  In such studies,  continuous flow of natu-
ral waters under  environmental conditions at  the site,  should  be empha-
sized.  Resulting information  would be of greater value in assessing the
effect of contaminants such as pesticides  than that obtained under  static,
monospecific test conditions.  More emphasis should  be  placed on the
chronic effects of pesticides.  Toxicological information must be developed
for the lower and intermediate aquatic organisms as well as for fish.  Popu-
lation changes in  lower food chain organisms  will ultimately be reflected
in the long-term stability of higher consumers, e.g. ,  fish.
        Quantitative data on residue transfers  in fresh water and marine
food webs are not available.   There is a lack  of information on the com-
plex species interrelationships within the food web. Some forms  establish
an intake,  storage and  elimination equilibrium.
        The presence of PCB compounds  in Southeastern  water, its biota
and its sediment is widespread.  These compounds are stable, biocon-
centrate in tissues and interfere with calcium deposition in birds.   This
effect has been demonstrated with DDT.
        Pesticide  synergisms with such factors as temperature,  water
hardness,  and stage of biological development have been established in
                                  13

-------
species native to the Southeast.  Synergisms, resulting from multiple
pesticide residues,  have not been investigated although many pesticides
are applied in combination to ensure control of target species.
        Chlorinated  hydrocarbon residues at microgram per liter con-
centration are not completely removed by standard water treatment
practices.  The adverse effects  of long-term, low-level, pesticide
exposure in humans is not known.  Monitored pesticide residues in fish,
shellfish, and ducks are not directly useful in assessing quantities  of
pesticides reaching humans via these foods.  Analyses  are  typically on
a whole-product basis and not the edible portions only.
        The most frequently occurring pesticides in Southeastern waters
are chlorinated hydrocarbons whose persistence may be in  the order of
years.  In general,  organophosphates, carbamates,  and herbicidal  com-
pounds  disappear from the water within a matter of a few weeks or  months.
Available data on degradation rates, mechanisms, and products are very
limited.  Information is based on laboratory studies which cannot be
extrapolated to natural environmental conditions.  For  example,  halo-
genated herbicides are readily degraded through photo-induced mecha-
nisms.   How  these mechanisms  relate to degradation of herbicides  in the
natural environment has not been established.
        The sorption of pesticides by suspended  material and substrates
in natural waters is an important factor  in the degradation process   It
may facilitate chemical reactions and translocation of pesticides to  the
estuary or to  areas  favorable for degradation.
        Information  on the occurrence and distribution of pesticides
reveals that,  while no concentrations may be detected in the water,  con-
centrations in the micrograms per kilogram range are  found in the  sedi-
ments of small ponds and estuaries.  The transport of pesticides in the
aqueous medium,  including that which is associated with particulate matter
and sediments, has not been defined.  Pesticides  concentrations which
                                  14

-------
reach bottom sediments may be cycled into the overlying water.  Cycling
can result from fall and spring overturns following thermal de-stratifica-
tion or from the  release or desorption of pesticides from the sediments.
       The chemical degradation products of certain chlorinated hydro-
carbons  and carbamates are  many time s more toxic than the parent
compounds.   Such toxicities  are vital  considerations of impact on non-
target organisms.
       The provisions of registration statutes of the Southeastern states
are quite similar to the statutory provisions of the'original Federal
Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).  All states have
not kept pace in modifying  their statutes to comply with changes in the
FIFRA in terms  of coverage  of categories of pesticides. The states
took  an excessive amount of  time to enact comparable  legislation to the
FIFRA to regulate intrastate commerce of pesticides.   Amendments
have  required several years  before  enactment.
       There are significant differences in scope of coverage in some
state pesticide laws compared to the coverage of the amended FIFRA.
There are also considerable  differences in the enforcement authorities
granted  to the state administering agencies.  The penalties enacted for
violations are weak and are not deterrents to violations. On the other
hand, the volume of litigation does not indicate that a strong penalty
deterrent is required.
       Two major loopholes  exist in the present registration statutes.
First, the exemption of officials  of state and federal agencies from
registering products used in  their official activities provides an oppor-
tunity for the aquatic environment to be  subject to pesticide contamination.
This  occurs without any possibility of assessing the type and volume  of
chemicals entering the waters.  Second,  the registration statutes do
not provide coverage of an important consumer protection  need.  This
relates to the packaging aspect of pesticide containers  to provide for
child safety.
                                  15

-------
        Some of the Southeastern states are ahead of the federal govern-
 ment in the enactment of pesticide application and use controls.  Until
 recently these controls have been limited to regulation of aerial appli-
 cators  in only four of the eight states.  There is no federal statute
 governing aerial applicators despite the fact that the aircraft are re-
 gulated by the Federal Aviation Administration.
        Two information systems used, or which should be used,  for
 decisions affecting the federal pesticide program  are either woefully
 inadequate  or warrant some improvement.  Only a small number of the
 incidences  of pesticide poisonings which occur are being reported
 (allegedly 10-15 percent) to  the National Clearinghouse for Poison Con-
 trol Centers.  This level of reporting is inadequate  to base federal or
 state policy decisions.  The South Carolina community pesticide surveys
 for two separate years would indicate that the 10-15  percent figure for
 the nation is a reliable estimate of the situation in the Southeastern
 states.
        One aspect of the National Transportation Safety Board's reporting
 system on aerial application accidents needs  improvement.  This relates
 to the toxicological effects on  pilots.
        The Southeastern states registration statutes are slightly less
 adequate than the FIFRA.   There are some states with application and
 use controls offering limited protection of the aquatic environment   The
 pesticide laws and common law principles applicable to the use of pesti-
 cides do a reasonably adequate job of protecting persons  and property
 from injury.  There  is a need for improvement in the administration of
 present controls.   Present state registration laws are inadequate with
 respect to protection of the  environment.  On the whole,  environmental
 protection is just now being written into the statutory language of the
Southeastern states in the  form of application and use laws
                                  16

-------
     ,  Cultural methods of control (sanitation,  tillage,  dates of planting
etc. ) along with the use of resistant crop varieties is the farmers first
line of defense against pests.  These practices considerably reduce but
do not eliminate the need for other pest control'methods.  For certain
pests, such as many plant viruses and nematodes, chemical treatment
is neither feasable nor economical. In such cases, physical, mechanical,
and regulatory (quarantine and certification) methods are utilized to re-
duce or prevent pest populations.
       Many major economic pests in the United States  have been intro-
duced from other countries without their  natural parasites and predators.
In some cases importation and release of natural enemies have proven
to be  effective in suppressing the pests.   Broad-spectrum pesticide
applications have the adverse effect of destroying the natural enemies of
insects.   This eliminates a natural check on pest populations in agricul-
tural  ecosystems.
       Efforts toward the development of biological control  agents  (virus,
bacteria,  protozoa, fungi, nematode attacking insects) may result in
safer and specific pest control practices.  Similarly numerous  insect hor-
mones (e. g.  juvenile and ecdysone) have  the potential of being utilized as
selective insecticides.
       Many insect attractants have been characterized and developed to
lure insects into traps containing pesticides,  pathogens  and  chemosteri-
lants. Chemical and electromagnetic radiation (light traps) attractants
also provide for early detection and location of  insect infestation.  This
is an important component in integrated and pest surveillance programs.
       Eradication of selected insect species has been achieved by re-
leasing sterile males to compete with the fertile ones in the natural
environment.   This method of pest eradication is  successful only if the
natural insect population is low.  In such cases, the sterile  males  "over-
whelm" the fertile males.  Expanded use of this technique has been
                                  17

-------
restricted by high cost and logistic factors.  Sterilization of the natural
pest population by chemosterilants  could reduce such time and cost
factors.
       Integrated control is a pest  population management system that
employs several suitable techniques to reduce pest populations and
maintain them at levels below those causing economic injury.  Inte-
gration provides  the best solution to a pest problem because all possible
controls are first evaluated.   This  approach requires ecological informa-
tion,  pest threshold,  and economic  injury levels.
       To date, public and private  efforts in pest control have been
directed toward development of pesticides with little effort being directed
to alternatives.   There is little inducement for industry to develop alter-
native methods until large-scale pilot studies  have  been proven success-
ful.  Pesticides will continue to be used in the foreseeable future.  Alter-
native methods, if further developed and applied, can reduce excessive
dependence on broad-spectrum pesticides.
       The aquatic environment in the Southeast is  being  subjected to
unnecessary pesticidal pollution.  In many instances, there are deficiencies
in fundamental information which preclude creation of adequate preventive
and corrective measures.   Programs and practices need  to be implemented
which maximize the benefits of pesticide use  while  minimizing its  impact
on the aquatic environment.
                                  18

-------
                   PART III.  RECOMMENDATIONS





       The recommendations derived are the consequence of a critical



review of the information available on pesticide use and environmental



pollution in the Southeast.  The scope of these recommendations fre-



quently transcends regional boundaries.




       The national data collection systems supporting the federal pesti-



cide program should be improved.  The federal government should en-



courage  legislation at the state and federal levels to make mandatory



reporting by physicians of treatment of pesticide poisonings.  The U. S.



Public Health Service should promote effective diagnosis and reporting



of pesticide poisonings among its physicians and physicians  at large.



The National Transportation Safety Board should cause improved re-



porting of the toxicological effects on pilots by requiring investigation



and re-submission of future reports where this data category is impro-



perly  completed.  The Department of Commerce should expand its



annual reporting requirements.  Information should be collected from



manufacturers and distributors on the quantity of pesticides shipped as



final sales to retailers or direct to consumers by county.




       The Environmental  Protection Agency should expand in-house and



supported monitoring activities to identify pesticides and their metabo-



lites in the aquatic environment (surface and ground fresh waters and



estuarine).  This  activity should be complemented by an expanded pro-



gram of  development of improved pesticide  concentration and analytical



procedures.   The elimination of the masking effect of poly chlorinated



biphenyls in analyses  of pesticides  is a specific analytical need.  A



coordinated surveillance system must be established to provide in-depth



pesticide information  on reservoirs, lakes, rivers, and estuaries.   The



results must relate the movement of pesticides  to hydrological conditions.



Quantification of the amounts and types of pesticides being transported
                                  19

-------
to the estuaries relative to climatic and seasonal factors is needed.

Rates of interchange between biological organisms and sediment,  must

be established.

       The U. S.  Department of Agriculture through its  Extension

Service, should:
       •   encourage growers and custom operators to use the most
           advanced pesticide application equipment under favorable
           meteorological conditions;
       •   encourage growers to use cultural and management
           practices which minimize sediment loss;
       e   expand its educational  efforts on proper selection and
           judicious use of pesticides ;

       •   increase its crop and pest surveillance services;

       •   discourage use of pesticides where furrow irrigation
           is practiced; and
       •   encourage incorporation of pesticides into the soil to
           minimize the effects of overland  drainage and atmospheric
           contamination of the  aquatic environment.

 In a related activity,  the Soil Conservation  Service  should expand its
soil erosion control program to emphasize retention of pesticide-treated

soils that now enter the aquatic systems.

       Government and industry should engage  in the development of

improved pesticide formulations and equipment capable of delivering the

minimum quantity of toxicant needed to control  the pest.   An integral

need is  the design and manufacture of equipment capable of  generating

droplets or particulates of narrow size range.  Improved methods of
pesticide impingement using electrostatics and  other techniques should be
evaluated.

       The Environmental Protection Agency should:

       •   develop water  quality standards for pesticides based upon
           residue tolerances of sensitive and essential members of the
          food web,
                                  20

-------
       •  develop water quality standards which establish strict limits
          on pesticide concentrations in effluents from point sources,
          industrial and municipal outfalls.  State water quality control
          agencies  should be responsible for enforcement of the stan-
          dards, and

       •  promote  development of standard methods and procedures for
          use  in decontamination of highly concentrated pesticide spillage.
          Practical and efficient decontamination procedures for low
          level pesticide concentrations, regardless of source,  should
          also be expanded.

       The  activities of the Working Group on Pesticides,  an intergovern-

mental agency organization, should be continued.   This liaison minimizes

the possibility of duplication of inhouse and sponsored studies.   It pro-
vides a potentially valuable forum for input to development of improved

analytical techniques and water quality standards.

       A set of national priorities must be established by the U.  S.

Department of Agriculture for developing alternative methods of pest

control beginning with those situations which utilize the largest quantities

of broad spectrum,  persistent pesticides.  The Environmental Protection

Agency should reexamine the registration of pesticides which persist in

the environment more than one year,  are very insoluble in water, and

are very soluble in  animal fat.  Focus of the examination  should be with
the view of  cancelling registration if safe,  effective alternative methods
are available.

       There are gaps in the knowledge of the  effect of pesticides that

can only be  filled after appropriate research.  Long-term (chronic)
epidimeological information should be developed for the effect on life

forms ranging  from microflora and microfauna to man. Programs of

the National Institutes of Health should be oriented to fill this need.  The

Environmental Protection Agency should:

       •  increase  inhouse and supported research to  develop infor-
          mation regarding specific pesticide  degradation rates, mecha-
          nisms, products and toxicities in fresh, brackish and salt
          water; and
                                  21

-------
       •   expand inhouse and supported toxicological measurements o
           the effect of pesticides on aquatic flora and fauna.   Emphasi
           must be given to dynamic rather  than static test procedures.
           Under these conditions the simultaneous effect of multiple
           contaminants and environmental factors can be  determine

The Environmental Protection Agency and the U. S. Department of
Agriculture should jointly support programs to develop information
regarding the effect of pesticide sorption of particulate and organic
matter on the subsequent chemical and biological degradation mecha-
nism.  Details are especially lacking on such processes involving  soils

and aquatic bottom sediments of the Southeast.

       Additional gaps in the knowledge  of pesticides and their effects

will be filled only after field  investigations produce relative,  useful

information.
       •   Field testing to improve  soil incorporation techniques for
           pesticides and the  injection equipment should be accelerated
           by government and industry.
       •   The Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste  Manage-
           ment Office should develop safe disposal techniques for waste
           pesticides,  and pesticide containers, when landfill and  re-
           cycling methods are employed.  These techniques  should
           provide for  chemical and/or biological decontamination of
           these wastes.
       •   The Environmental Protection Agency Air Pollution Control
           Office should establish standards for incineration of pesti-
           cides,  and their containers, designed to limit atmospheric
           contamination and  the resultant damage to the aquatic envi-
           ronment.  This office should also determine the contribution
           of pesticides to the aquatic and soil  environment by atmos-
           pheric fallout and  washout.

       •   The Agricultural Research Service of U. S.  Department of
           Agriculture should receive greater support for large-scale
           field testing to  determine the  effectiveness of promising
           alternative methods  of pest control.  Successful programs
           can then be adopted regionally to eradicate,  reduce or  main-
           tain pest populations below economic injury thresholds. Pest
           control at the farmer level should be reoriented to facilitate
           management programs for the entire infestated region.
                                  22

-------
       •   The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.  S.  Depart-
           ment of Agriculture should jointly ascertain the long-range
           effects of low-level concentrations of pesticides  added to the
           aquatic environment by irrigation practices.

       Certain regulatory and legislative recommendations  are derived

from the study.

       •   The Southeastern states must reduce the time required to
           formulate pesticide legislation,  enact legislation  and imple-
           ment pesticide programs as technical advances elucidate the
           complex interaction between man and the other factors affecting
           the  environment.
       •   Annual registration of pesticide products as practiced by the
           states should be adopted for federal registration.
       •   The registration procedures  on pesticides should include an
           assessment of packaging adequacy from the viewpoint of child
           safety.
       •   An Executive Order should be issued by the President which
           would cause all federal agencies introducing pesticide  sub-
           stances into public waters and onto public  lands to file with
           state water pollution agencies the chemicals used, the amount,
           the  time  of use and the purpose.
       •   The federal government should encourage  state water pollu-
           tion control agencies  to issue regulations requiring all state
           government agencies  using pesticides in state waters and on
           public lands to file similar statements.

       •   The focus of the federal pesticide program should be shifted
           to provide incentives  for the  states to enact and enforce a
           high quality state pesticide program.  Federal standards on
           registration, inspection, and enforcement should be established.
           States should be provided with federal grant assistance to oper-
           ate  and administer their pesticide programs which satisfy  the
           federal standards.

       •   The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide  and Rodenticide  Act should
           be  amended to provide for a joint, comprehensive, federal-state
           pesticide program and to grant federal officials authority to
           issue  "stop-sale"  and "stop-use" orders.

       •   The investigative function performed by the Accident Investi-
           gation Section in the Pesticides  Office of the Environmental
           Protection Agency should be  expanded.
                                  23

-------
PESTICIDE USAGE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN
   UNITED STATES AND ITS EFFECT ON
      THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

                 Volume II
                 24

-------
                       A.  PESTICIDE USAGE
                           1.   Introduction
       The southeastern United States has traditionally  grown crops,
such as cotton,  tobacco,  citrus, peaches and peanuts, which require
application of large quantities  of pesticides for profitable production.
In the past, the Southeast has accounted for the largest share of organo-
chlorines used in the United States.   Control of pests in cotton, alone
                                              2
consumes  70% of the total DDT used nationally.   The use of pesticides
is an almost inevitable consequence of the  development of modern
intensive agriculture.  High production characteristics of new hybrid
varieties,  monoculturing of crops  and minimum tillage practices have
increased  the need for pesticides.
       The national rate of increase in total pesticide usage has
averaged more  than 7% a year. For herbicides the increase is  sub-
stantially higher and their usage has more than doubled over a 4 year
                 3
period (1962-66).    The sales  of pesticides in the USA for the 8 year
period, 1962-1969,  are shown in Table A-l.
                                                      3
              Table A-l.  Pesticide Usage  in the U.S.A.
Year
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969

Fungicides
97
93
95
106
118
120
124
127
Sales in millions
Herbicides
95
123
152
184
221
288
318
348
of pounds
Insecticides
442
435
445
473
502
489
498
502

Total
634
651
692
762
841
897
940
983
       Source:  Metcalf,  R.  L.
                                25

-------
       Information on principal usage, types and volumes of pesticides

is important in this  era of national concern for the environment.  This

is particularly vital with respect to the persistent pesticides, to

determine the extent and trends of environmental  pollution.



              2.  Major Crops and Soils of the Southeast


       A variety of  climatic gradations from temperate to subtropical

and diverse soil types makes the southeastern United States  suitable

for profitable production of many crops.



                             a.   Crops


       The most commonly grown crops  are tobacco,  cotton, peanuts,

soybeans, corn,  pecans, peaches, citrus fruit and vegetables.  Of the

total national production of tobacco,  citrus, peanuts, pecans, cotton

and vegetables in 1969  approximately 85%,  68%, 65%,  61%, 28% and 12%,
                                            4
respectively, were produced in the Southeast.  (Table A-2).


       North Carolina  and Kentucky  lead in production of tobacco;

Florida  in citrus production; Alabama and Georgia in production of

peanuts; and Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi in production of pecans.


       For many years,  the southeastern United States was  the leading

producer of cotton, however, the  region presently accounts for only 28%

of the total U. S. production (Table A-2).




                              b.   Soils


       The soils of the southeastern United States are generally acid

;n reaction and low in organic matter, and  fall either entirely or partially

into 13 physiographic regions.    These are as follows:
                              26

-------
                            Table A-2:  Production of Various Crops in the Southeastern States,  1969'
ro
State
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Total for the
Southeast
D. S. Total
% of U. S. Total
in the Southeast

Tobacco
1000 Ibs.
800
26,028
97,890
436,802

715,968
136,658
120,796
1,534,942
1,806.656
85

Cotton
1000 bales
461
9.4
282
5.8
1,328
100
205
422
2j813.2
10,015
28.1

Peanuts
1000 Ibs.
285,175
85,065
946,270

1,200
337,840
20,150

I,675j700
2,523,399
66.4

Soybeans
1000 bu.
14,743
4,563
11,208
13,580
50,380
24,258
21,578
28,632
. 168,942
1,116,876
15.
Crops
Rice Corn
1000 cwt 1000 bu.
17,332
13,962
47,058
76,846
2,520 9,858
89,828
18,894
27,830
.2,520 301,608
91,303 4,577,864
1 2.7 6.6

Pecans
1000 Ibs.
36,000
4,600
83,000

14,000
3,000
3,500

144^100
235,600
61.2

Apples
mil. Ibs.



20.9

204.0
8.0
10.4
243.3
6,721.8
3.6

Peaches Citrus *
mil. Ibs. 1000 boxes
50.0
180,000
175.2
16.5
17.5
56.0
338.0
9.4
662.6 . 180,000
3,665.4 265,070
18.1 67.9

Vegetables
tons
109,830
1,687,680
200,380
15,480
63,580
242,120
166,730
52,990
2,538,790
20,441,230
12.4
         *  Production of Crop




         Source:  Agricultural
for the growing season of 1968-69




Statistics - USDA (modified)

-------
•   The Coastal Plain soils - extend from South-Central Texas
    to North Central North Carolina.  Cotton production is
    centered in this area and much of it is  rolling or hilly. ^
    Control of excessive soil loss by water erosion is  a major
    management problem.

•   The Southern Appalachia Plateau - comprises a  series
    of relatively flat-topped ridges in Northeastern Alabama
    and Northwestern Georgia.   The soils are developed from
    sandstones and shales. Soils developed from shale tend
    to be finer and shallower and present a problem of water
    infiltration and erosion.
                                                        .,v
•   The Southern Piedmont - extends from North Carolina
    Southwest  through South Carolina and Georgia into Alabama.
    Most of the Piedmont is hilly.  Because of the steep slopes
    and the erosive nature of the soils,  erosion has  been  severe.
    The surface  soil has been removed in many places and
    subsoils are now frequently farmed.

•   The Limestone Valleys - contain  soils of limestone origin
    and are mainly found in the Tennessee  and Coosa River
    Valleys in Alabama.  Small areas are found in Northwestern
    Georgia.   The topography is level to undulating.

•   The Brown Loam Area - forms a belt east of the Mississippi
    River flood plain which extends from Northwestern Tennessee
    South across the Mississsippi to the lowlands of the Gulf
    Coast.  The  topography ranges from level to hilly. Row
    cropping has resulted in extensive erosion over  the entire
    area.

•   The Black Prairie Area or Black Belt - extends from the
    eastern part of Alabama to the northeastern corner of
    Mississippi.  The land is gently rolling and the  soils  are
    poorly drained.

•   The Piedmont Subregion - includes all  of North  Carolina
    except the nothern one-third.  The land is gently rolling and
    rough.  Soils erode  easily and the fine-textured subsoil,
    which is very difficult to cultivate, is exposed.  Practices
    such as contour farming and terracing  should be extensively
    used because of the  relatively high erodibility of the many
    sandy soils in this area.
                           28

-------
        •   The Blue Ridge Subregion - lies mostly in Western North
            Carolina, but it also includes parts of,  Tennessee, Georgia
            and South Carolina.   Sheet erosion is a severe problem.

        •   The Appalachian Valley Subregion -  extends eastward across
            Tennessee and several adjoining states.  Surface erosion on
            many slopes is severe.

        •   The Allegheny-Cumberland Highlands - include the Cumber-
            land Plateau of Tennessee and the eastern mountainous region
            of Kentucky.  The soils are relatively shallow  and moderate
            erosion in cultivated fields is a serious problem.

        •   The Blue grass Subregion - consists of two  separate sections
            one in Kentucky and the other in Tennessee.  Soil erosion
            is not a problem in this area.

        •   The Florida Peninsula adjacent Flatwoods - include  parts
            of South Carolina and Georgia and almost all of Florida.
            Runoff and erosion are of minor importance in this region.
            Natural drainage of the soils varies from excessive to very
            poor.

        •   The Mississippi Delta Region - is an alluvial plain of  the
            Mississippi Valley.   At least 30 states have contributed,
            through erosion, to the soils of this valley.  Soil types
            reflect the action of floodwater and  soils vary from clay to
            sand  and have poor to excessive internal drainage.  Most of
            the land is gently rolling  and erosion is a problem.

        The soil types of the United States have also been classified
 according to 7th Approximation which is a new system.    Most of the

 soils of the Southeastern States,  except those in Florida and Kentucky,
 belong to the  order ultisols and  suborder udults.
             3.  Historical Development of Pesticide Usage

        Historical development of pesticide usage in southeastern United
States closely parallels the development for the entire country.

        Plant protection by the use of chemical sprays or dusts or seed

treatment did not originate in the 20th  century but has been practiced

on a small scale for a long time.  However, large scale farming

practices of the twentieth century have hastened the evolution of

pesticides.

                               29

-------
        The first insecticidal materials used for insect control included
the arsenicals, lime-sulphur, petroleum oils and nicotine.   During the
intervals between World Wars I and II , flourine  compounds,  Pyrethrum,
Rotenone, synthetic organic materials, (e.g.  dinitro compounds) and
thiocyanates came into use.  Discovery of insecticidal activity of DDT
in 1942 led to concerted efforts by chemists and entomologists to find
other potentially effective insecticides.  These efforts  led  to discovery
of such compounds as  Benzene  hexachloride, Toxaphene, Chlordane,
                                                7
Aldrin, Dieldrin and several organic  phosphates.
        The history of weed control in crops began with the use of salt,
ashes,  and smelter wastes.  From 1887-1900, copper salt was used to
selectively kill broad leaf weeds in cereals. In the year 1900, calcium
eyanide was  added to the list of selective herbicides.  Ferrous sulfate,
copper  salt and sodium arsenate were used before World War II.
Auxin activity  and  selectivity of 2, 4-D were discovered in 1942 and
1944, followed by 2,4, 5-T in  1948 and phthalamic acid  in 1952.  Many
other herbicides belonging to the groups such as  substituted ureas,
carbamates, triazines and substituted phenols have been  developed and
                         8
are presently being used.
        The history of fungicides use can be divided into three distinct
eras.  These are the Sulfur Era (from ancient times to 1882) the Copper
Era (1882 to 1934)  and the Organic Fungicide Era (began in  1934).  Dur-
ing the  19th century, however,  two classes of inorganic fungicides, first
sulfur,  either alone or as  lime sulfur, and then copper, principally a
mixture of copper sulfate and lime in  water called Bordeaux  mixture,
were being applied to foliage to protect plants from disease fungi.  These
developments continued and by the 1930's many of the important foliar
                               30

-------
diseases were being controlled by spraying or dusting with some form
of either copper or sulfur.   In spite of the  subsequent development of
organic fungicides,  sulfur and copper fungicides  are  still being used.
                                                            9
However, the quantities of each being applied are decreasing.
       Concurrently with the early development of foliage fungicides
development of chemicals for the control of seed-borne bunt or  smut
fungi of cereals occurred.  The use of copper sulfate soaks was for a
time popular, followed by the introduction  of formaldehyde and  copper
carbonate.  In the early part of this century the development of organic
mercury compounds for seed treatment was initiated, the  first  being a
chlorophenol mercury.  The nonmercury organic fungicides began in
1934 with the issuance of a patent covering a  variety of derivatives of
dithiocarbamic acid.  Development was slow but  in the early 1940's
 Thiram was introduced as a seed treatment. Thiram is also effective
on foliage but other dithiocarbamates such asFerbam, Ziram, Zineb,
and Maneb were more fully developed as foliage protectants.  The
latter two compounds  are in particular being widely used for control of
a great variety of foliar diseases. They are effective and safe  at
economic rates of application and have contributed greatly to the
                                                9
production of quality vegetables and other crops.

                  4.  Major Pests and Their Control
       There are several dozen destructive pests of  crops in the  south-
eastern United States that cause heavy losses virtually every year and
are responsible for the use of most of the pesticides.  These major pests
and the pesticides recommended and widely used are presented in Tables
A-3, A-4,  A-5.  This information was compiled from the  State Agri-
cultural Extension Service Bulletins.
                                31

-------
         TABLE A-3  Economic Weeds of Major Southeastern  Crops and Herbicides Recommended for Their Control.
            CROPS
          WEEDS
HERBICIDES RECOMMENDED
         Tobacco
                                          Annual grasses,  broad
                                          leaf weeds,  white
                                          clover
                                        Pebulate, Benefin Mylone,
                                        Vampam, Tillam, Enide
         Citrus
         Peanuts
          Cotton
oo
ro
          Peaches
          Vegetables
         Soybeans
         Corn
        Apples
 Broad leaf weeds and
 grasses

 Broad leaf weeds, grasses
 Texas millet, nut grass

 Annual grasses, broad
 leaf weeds, crabgrass
 green and yellow foxtails,
 gooseweed

 Annual grasses and broad
 leaf weeds

 Annual grasses, broad leaf
 weeds, crab grass. Johnson
 grass

Annual grasses, borad leaf
weeds, ragweed, Johnson  grass,
barn yard grass

 Annual grasses,  ragweed,  Johnson
 grass, crab grass, velvet leaf

 Annual grasses,  broad leaf weeds
 woody perennials,  poison  ivy
 Bromacil, Fenuron,  methyl
 bromide, 2-4-D,  Dalapon

 Vernolate, Benefin  Naptalam,
 DCP, Nitralin, Lasso,  Dynanap,Balan

 Trifluralin, EPTC,  Nitralin,
 DEPA, MSMA, CIPC, Planavin,
 Cotoran, Diuron
 Simazine, Dalapon, Dichlo-
 benil

 Vapam,  Bromacil,  Trifluralin,  Linuron,
 Benefin,  Diphenamid,  Randox, Vegedex
 EPTC,  DCPA

 Amiben, Vernolate, Dalapon,
 Lasso, Trifluralin,  2, 4-DB,
 Tenoran, Dyanap

 Atrazine. 2, 4-D, So.azome, Dalapon
 Diuron, Paraquat, Linuron, Sutan, Lasso

 Methyl bromide,  Simazine, Dalapon

-------
        Table A-4 Economic Insects of Major Southeastern Crops and Insecticides Recommended for Their Control
           CROP
                                               INSECTS
                                             INSECTICIDES USED
CO
CO
Tobacco


Citrus


Peanuts



Cotton



Peaches

Vegetables
         Soybeans
         Corn
         Apples
budworm, hornworm, cabbage
lopper, bollworm, aphids

Scale insects, mealy bugs,
White flies, aphids

Southern corn rootworm,
corn earworm, southern
armyworm

Bollweevil, bollworm,. pink
bollworm, tobacco budworm,
cabbage looper

Scales, oriental fruit moth

Tomato and tobacco hornworm,
tomato fruitworm, cabbage looper,
aphids, imported cabbageworm,
root maggots

Corn earworm, bean leaf beetle,
stink bugs, green cloverworm.

Armyworm, corn earworm, cutworm,
common stalk borer, corn leaf
aphid

Codling moth, leaf roller, cur-
culio, aphids
                                                                                 Carbaryl, Malathion,
                                                                                 Parathion

                                                                                 Azinphosmethyl, Parathion,
                                                                                 Systox

                                                                                 Diazinon, Malathion,
                                                                                 Carbaryl
                                                                                 Methyl parathion, DDT
                                                                                 Toxaphene
                                                                                 Azinphosmethyl,  Parathion

                                                                                 Diazinon, Demeton, Phosdrin,
                                                                                 Carbaryl, Methoxychlor
                                                                         Carbaryl, Methoxychlor
                                                                         Malathion, Methoxychlor
                                                                         Azinphosmethyl, Parathion

-------
    Table A-5  Economic diseases of Major Southeastern Crops and Fungicides Recommended for Their Control
        CROP
             DISEASES
      FUNGICIDES RECOMMENDED
<**
      Tobacco
      Citrus
      Peanuts
      Cotton
     Peaches
     Vegetables
     Soybeans
     Corn
     Apples
Wild fire, anthracnose
Blue Mold
Citrus canker, anthracnose,
melanose, scab, dieback

leafspot, seed rot, seedling
blight, pod rot

Dampling off, seed decay
angular leafspot, anthracnose,
wild fire

leaf curl, blossom flight, scab,
rhizopus rot

Downy mildew, anthracnose, scab,
leafspot, fusarium wilt, southern
blight

leaf spots, wild fire, downy mil-
dew, sclerotial blight, seed
decay

Seed decay, seedling blight, seed-
ling root rot

scab,  rust, mildew, fire, blight,
leaf spot
Zineb, Ferbam, Maneb,
Meltiram, Streptomycin
Sulfate

Neutral Copper Compounds,
Metallic Copper,  Zineb

Thiram, Captan, Terraclor,
Zineb, Methylisothiocyanate

Captan, Maneb, Terraclor,
Terrazole
Dichlone, Captan, Ferbam
Maneb, Zineb, Tri-basic
Copper, Terraclor
Thiram, Captan
                                                                              Thiram, Captan,  Maneb
Maneb, Zineb, Captan, Cyprex

-------
               5.  Regional and State Usage of Pesticide
       Early realization of the potential acute danger to the public
posed by use  of synthetic chemicals to control agricultural and other
pests led to the establishment of the Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).  This act provided for registration of
pesticidal chemicals shipped in interstate commerce as well as im-
ported pesticides.
       Concern for the total  quantities of pesticides applied for control
of agricultural pests, and the associated chronic health hazard to the
public and the environment, is of recent origin.  Consequently,  no laws
exist which require pesticide manufactuers,  distributors, or users
(growers) to report actual  quantities of pesticides sold or applied in
the different states to any state or Federal Agency.   The absence of
such  regulations prohibits  an accurate inventory of  pesticide usage
by states.
       The Economic Research Service  of the USDA published
information on pesticide usage by regions for two years.  This
publication was terminated after  1966.  The information published was
based on random sampling techniques and not on actual quantities of
pesticide applied by growers.
       The existence and availability of inventory material and
information varies widely from state to state within Region IV.  Several
states (e. g.  Tennessee and Kentucky) have conducted special surveys to
obtain quantitative information on pesticide usage.   Generally these
surveys  provide information  on pesticide usage for  one year.   Other
states such as, North Carolina, have very little or  no information on
pesticide usage.
                                35

-------
       A brief discussion of available inventory information for the
Southeastern states,  other than North Carolina, follows.

                             a.  Regional
       Much of the information on pesticide usage compiled by the
Economic Research Service was published on a combined state basis.
In one case the information is combined for four  states in Region IV
(Alabama, Georgia,  South Carolina, Florida) and in another, for all
eight states.  A discussion of this  combined information is contained
in this section.  Additionally, control of fire ants, which is a regional
problem, is also discussed.

                   (1) Combined States  Information
       In 1964 herbicide use was less than insecticides and fungicides.
Out of approximately 84 million pounds  of herbicides used in the country,
the Southeast (Alabama,  Georgia,  South Carolina and Florida-four state
area)  accounted for  only 3. 4 million pounds.  Herbicides used  in large
quantities were 2,  4-D, Dinitro, Atrazine,  Trifluralin and Benefin. 10
       Thirty-five million pounds of insecticides were used in the Southeast
in 1964.   The Delta area (Mississippi,  Louisiana and Arkansas) utilized
27 million pounds.  The insecticides most frequently used were DDT,
Toxaphene, Carbaryl,  and Methyl parathion.  More acres were treated
with DDT in the Southeast than in any other region, 3. 5 million acres or
                                   10
31 percent of  the total of 48 states.
       During the same year fungicides were applied in greater quantities
than any other pesticidal group.  This amounted  to 73 million pounds or
44% of the total used nationally. Sulfur was  the leading fungicidal
material applied (64. 5  million pounds).
                                  36

-------
       In 1966 insecticides applied to cotton exceeded the combined
total for all other major crops.   '    A similar situation was observed
for fungicides applied to citrus (Table A-6).
                      (2)  The Fire Ant Problem
       Some fifty years ago the imported fire ant Solenopsis saevissima
richteri Forel entered the United States from Latin America, probably
at the port of Mobile,  Alabama.    These ants construct large mounds,
have fiery stings and exhibit aggressive mobilization upon disturbance.
       At least two species of native fire ants in the  southeastern
United States so closely resemble the imported ant that it  is difficult
                                                                  13
and at times impossible for an expert to separate them in  the field.
       There have been three periods in the history of the ant's  spread.
An initial period of a decade or two (1918-1932) when the ant became
established on about two or  three hundred thousand acres within  a
few miles of the Mobile Bay area; and natural spread peripherally
was less than one mile per year.   A second period of perhaps two
decades (1932-1950) when the ant became established on about two to
three million acres within 50 miles of Mobile Bay area,  and natural
spread was moving peripherally at a rate of one to three miles per year.
                                                                     13  14
A third,  seemingly explosive, period was during the  last two decades.   '
By 1957,  these ants had spread over large land areas in Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Florida, as well as small areas in
Texas and Georgia.
       There is very little conclusive evidence that the ant actually
harms other insects, plants, or birds and wildlife.  But it inhabits
open areas such as fields, where its large mounds inhibit  use of farm
                              37

-------
Table A- 6 Pesticides Used on Major Crops of the Southeastern United States,
           Federal Region IV, 1966 11,12


Herbicides :


Tobacco 	 :

Soybeans 	 :

288
2,542
15
2,892
3,643
1,395
Pounds
; Insecticides :

2,355
32,786
3,330
5,529
428
2,712
active ingredients
Fungicides :
•1,000 pounds
1,502
50
20
55
2
4
Other :

411
1,294
12,134
6,150
44
49
Total
pesticides

4,536
36,672
15,499
14,626
4,117
4,160
     Source:  Eichers, T. R.  (modified)
                                     38

-------
 equipment.  Its wasplike sting causes a great deal of pain and
 inconvenience to livestock, farmers,  laborers,  picnickers,  and
 s choolchildr en.
       Results of research begun in 1949 on control of the insect in
Alabama indicated good control with 2 pounds of Heptachlor or Dieldrin
or 4 pounds of Chlordane per acre, when broadcast as granules, for a
                       1 /   iv
period of 3 to 5 years.  '     Aerial application of 5% or  10%
Heptachlor at a rate of 2 pounds of technical material per acre was
equally effective for control of this insect.  Bait containing 0. 075,
0. 15, or 0. 3% Mirex applied at rates of 3, 5 or 10 Ibs.  per acre
                                                             18
respectively, all gave  excellent control of ants in Mississippi.
       Mirex was hailed on its introduction as "the perfect pesticide"
because  it is quite precise in killing its  target organism.
       Mirex is a delayed-action bait.  A first spraying is almost
entirely  picked up by worker ants who take it back to their nests.  There
it then kills the queens and ultimately destroys most of the colonies.
Two more sprayings aimed at killing off the  remaining ants were
included in prior practice but this carries the risk that the bait, left
untouched  by the now-sparse fire ant population,  will  be ingested by
                                                            15
other insects or birds  or will flow into neighboring streams.
       The use of Mirex has been critized because, in some  field tests,
it has been toxic to  shrimp, crabs, and other species of ants, such as
the carpenter ants.   A final question arises because,  like DDT and  mer-
cury Mirex is highly persistent in the natural environment.   It could
pass along the food  chain to become concentrated in higher organisms.
Current methods of Mirex bait application attempt to limit these
hazards.  Mirex is  aerially sprayed at 1. 7 grams of Mirex chemical
                                39

-------
and 11/4 pounds of corncob grits and soybean oil per acre.  This is
equivalent to about two thimblefuls of Mirex chemical per acre.
       Despite the minute quantities applied, Mirex ranks as the
                                                            19
fourth most abundantly found pesticide in Southeastern water.
                             b.  Alabama
        Cotton, peanuts, soybeans, corn, pecans,  peaches and vegetables
are the most important crops produced in Alabama.
        The most commonly used herbicides, in the state in 1970,  were
2, 4-D,  Atrazine, Treflan, Planavin, Cotoran, DSMA, MSMA, Dinitro,
Balan,  and Lorox (Table A-7).
        Cotton receives applications of both pre-and post-emergence
herbicides.  The most commonly used herbicides  are Treflan and
Planavin (preemergence) and DSMA and MSMA (postemergence).
Since much of the total cotton acreage receives application of both
pre-and post-emergence herbicides, the figures for  acres of cotton
                                     21
treated exceed the total acres planted.   Approximately one-half of
the corn acreage receives applications of preemergence (Atrazine
                                                  22
and 2, 4-D) and post-emergence herbicides  (2, 4-D).
       The dollar value of insecticides used shows an increase from
1965 to 1969 but declines  slightly in 1970 (Table A-8).  Of all the  crops,
cotton and  peanuts were the major users of insecticides.  Mirex has
been used extensively in attemps to control the fire ant.    ^
       Quantitative information on fungicide usage in the state  is
presently not available.
                              40

-------
Table A-7:  Herbicide Usage (acres treated with various herbicides)
           for the Major Crops Grown in Alabama,  1970  20~24
Crop Acres Planted Acres Treated Preemergence
Herbicide
Cotton 550,000 846,068 Treflan alone
or
Planavln alone
Treflan and
Cotoran
Planavin and
Cotoran
Cotoran alone
Others
Total Pre-
emergence
Corn 694,000 306,923 Atrazine
Lasso
Others
Total Pre-
emergence
Treatment
Acreage Treated
165,328
95,107
35,627
58,780
-
475,362
189,429
16,659
-
215,124
Postemergence Treatment
Herbicide
DSMA or
MSMA
MSMA and
Cotoran
MSMA and
Karmex
MSMA and
Her ban
Others
Total Post-
emergence
2, 4-D
Atrazine
Others
Total Post-
emergence
Acreage Treated Remarks
118,530 Acres treated "over the
top" 58,679
50,260 Layby - acres-89,089
treated with Karnex,
Cotoran, Lorox
20,050
17,415
-
222,938
46,837 Acres treated preplant with
butylate - 12,912
39,478
-
91,799

-------
ro
                                                           Table A-7 (Continued)

             Herbicide Usage (acres treated with various herbicides) for  the Major Crops Grown in Alabama,  1970
Soybeans
Sorghum
Sorghum
Sudan
Coastal
Bermuda
609,000 242,000
7,218 Propazlne
2,870
2, 4-D
8,546
Simazine
24,200 - 9,680 Acres - 58,080 treated
preplant with some planavin,
some vernan
3,788 Atrazine 4,300
2, 4-D 2,918


Cracking time
       Peanuts
                       190,000
253,486
37,750
Dinitro alone   14,850
                                                                                       Dlnitro and
                                                                                       Falone         18,175

                                                                                       Dinitro and
                                                                                       Diphenamid     16,775

                                                                                       Total Cracking
                                                                                       Time          58,025
Acres treated preplant 78,370
with Balan, 29,800 with Belan-
Vernan, others -
Total 114,861
          Source:  Burns, E. (modified)

-------
             Table A-8: Insecticide Usage on Crops, and Beef and Dairy Cattle in Alabama (1965-1970)
                                                                                                    25-30
CO
A. Cotton 1965
1. Total acres planted 816, 60A
2. Acres dusted
3. Acres sprayed
4. Non-treated acres
5. Systemic Insecticides
treated as:
a. seed treatment
b. furrow treatment
B. Peanuts
1. Total acres planted 201,792
2. Acres treated with
systemic insecticides
3. Estimated cost of control
programs $455,400
4. Estimated value $1,918,200
C. Soybeans
1. Total acres planted 280,987
2. No. of acres requiring
insect control
3. Estimated cost of control
program
4. Estimated value
1966
559,733
113,645
319,268
96,995
194,099
50,045
$352,074
$2,100,110
316,195
194,262
1967
89,209
273,884
10,430
91,950
47,176
59,975
$312,643.50
$1,510,804
177,815
1968
90,220
336,262
113,304
115,866
59,781
67,090
$281,941
$934,359
191,305
506,050
1969
79,951
' 354,802
139,827
742,752
77,865
$270,293
$1,013,509
273,370
$2,899,250
1970
47,075
310,953
206,797
170,125
121,336
84,690
$12 per acre
245,102
$1,462,160

-------
                                                Table A-8  (Continued)

              Insecticide  Usage  on Crops,  and Beef and Dairy Cattle  in Alabama (1965-1970)


D. Stored Grains
No. of bushels of all grain
In form storage funigated and/or
treated with a protectant
1965 1966
2,907,500 2,065,100
1967
2,692,200 " "
1968
" '2,523,500
1969 1970
2,360,000 1,527,800
E. Other crops (acres treated)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Commertcal crops
Peacan trees
Peaches
Apples
Cloves
Alfalfa
Corn
Grain Sorghum
Temporary grazing crops
91,822

8,026
1,779
17,430
2,840
170
9,950

81,106
444
2,777
1,807
20,349
1,575
1,248

74,415
72,344



14,540
1,523
1,820

42,275
74,795
19,540


12,485 5,645
1,455 660
4,055 21,550

45,060 61,825
F. Beef Cattle
1.

2.

Beef cattle treated
for all Insects
Estimated value of control
program

1,221,300 746,170

$3,098,850 $3,760,500

787,060

$4,032,500

750,680

$4,027,750

761,150 786,600

$4,411,500 $4,352,300
G.   Dairy Cattle

    1.  Dairy cattle treated
       for all Insects
    2.  Estimated value of control
       program
    3.  Dairy barns in which an
       effective fly control program
       was conducted
   161,741      122,415          115,395          114,023          113,657         401,940


$1,499,185   $1,343,656       $1,339,295        $1,293,450       $2,233,400       $1,840,625


    1,402        1,134             967              925             856             804

-------
                                                          Table A-8 (Continued)

                          Insecticide Usage on Crops, and  Beef and Dairy Cattle in Alabama (1965-1970)





                                                   1965         1966            1967            1968             1969            1970
          Acres treated with mirex
          fire ants control                        226,397      578,711          585,716          278,681          180,205          273,890


          Amount of insecticides used
          in all aspects of insect control
          (dollar value)                        $12,854,500   $16,737,500       $17,717,500      $17,289,723       $21,473,500      $19,355,700



             Source:  Ledbetter, R. J.   (modified)
in

-------
                             c.  Florida

       A wide variety of field crops, fruits and vegetables are grown

in Florida.   Control of pests in these crops requires extensive use of

pesticides.
       Available information on herbicide usage indicates that Treflan,

Lasso,  2, 4-D,  Hyvar X, Atrazine and Randox are the most commonly
used herbicides (Table A-9).31 Herbicides are also employed for  aquatic

weed control (primarily water  hyacinth) which is a serious  problem in
Florida.  It has been estimated that aquatic weed control  measures are

needed on 2. 8 million acres of inland water.   Presently only 10% of this

area is  treated with herbicides.
       Quantitative information on pesticide usage is lacking, particularly

with respect to insecticides and fungicides.

       Projections on future use of pesticides in Florida  indicate the
         32
following:

       •   Herbicide usage will  reach approximately 5. 5 million
           pounds by 1975 and about 6 million pounds by 1980.
           Increased acreage  under  treatment as well as use of
           more than one chemical or application per crop will
           be responsible for  these increases.

       •   Fungicide usage will  also increase considerably.  Over
           32 million pounds  of fungicidal chemicals will be utilized
           annually by 1975 and  40 million pounds by 1980.   These
           projections were based on chemicals which were available
           in 1969.   Should new  fungicides with improved efficiency
           become available the figures  for  projected usage will
           probably be lower.

       •   Projected usage of insecticides and miticides, other than
           oil and sulfur, will be approximately 17 million pounds
           in 1975,  and will reach approximately  19  million by 1980.

       «   The  projected usage of fumigants and non-fumigant nematicides
           for 1975 are about  6. 2 and 5.2 million pounds, respectively.
                                46

-------
    TABLE A-9 Herbicides Usage on Various Crops in Florida,  1971
                                                                  31
Crop
Corn
Soybeans
Peanuts
Tobacco
Cotton
Vegetables
Citrus
Woody
ornamentals
Acres Planted
357,000
204,000
53,000
11,000
12,000

800,000
10,000
% of acreage treated
20
40
80
20
90

70
40
Herbicides used
in decreasing order
Atrazine, 2,4-D,
Sutan, Lasso
Treflan, Lasso, Dyanap
Tenor an
Balan, Lasso, Premerge,
Dyanap , Vernan
Tillam or Enide
Treflan, Organic Ar-
senicals (MSMA, DSMA) ,
Lorox
Randox , Vegedex , Diphe-
namid, Treflan, Eptam
Hyvar X, Casoron, Sinbar,
Paraquat
Paraquat, Herbicide Oils,
Simazine, Treflan
Source:   Currey, W. L.  (modified)

-------
                           d.  Tennessee
       Some of the most important crops  grown in Tennessee are
cotton,  tobacco,  soybeans, corn,  fruits, and vegetables.
       The pesticide market in Tennessee is relatively large.   A
survey conducted in 1965 by the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment
Station indicated that over 17. 3 million pounds of pesticide materials
valued at more than $16. 6 million, at the  manufacturer's level, were
utilized.  This represented 4. 6% of the total U.' S. sales for that year.
Of total pesticide sales, 56% were for insecticides, 28%  for herbicides,
                                                              33
7% for fungicides, and  9% for rodenticides and other pesticides.
       Another survey was conducted by the Tennessee State Department
of Agriculture in 1970.   In this survey,  acreage  figures for various
crops were taken from the reports of the cooperative Federal-State
statistics on agriculture.  Crops represented in the survey are, for
the most part,  the major crops of the State's agriculture.  Total
acreage of crops surveyed in the state represented more than 90% of the
cultivated acreage.  Information obtained by the  survey on acreage and
pesticide usage by crops were projected against  the total acreage  in the
State to arrive at a prediction of total pesticide usage by crops.  The
information indicated that herbicides were used more widely and in
greater amounts (67% of total) than all other pesticides combined.
Insecticides accounted for 30% of total usage and fungicides only 3%. 34
       Use of preemergence herbicides for weed control in corn,  cotton
and soybeans increased from  1966  to 1970.  (Tables  A-10, A-11,  A-12)
A similar situation existed for use of post-emergence herbicides on
cotton and soybeans.  However, a slight decrease was observed for post-
emergence treatment in corn.
                                48

-------
                      Table A-10  Acreage of Corn Crop Treated with Various Herbicides,
                                  in Tennessee,  1966-197035
VD

Total acres planted
Preemergence Herbicides
Alachlor (Lasso)
Atrazine (AAtrex)
Atrazine (AAtrex) +
butylate (Sutan)
Diuron (Karraex)
2, 4-D
Others (Paraquat , and
Simazine
Total acres treated with
preeraergence herbicides
% of acreage treated
Postemergence Herbicides
Atrazine
Linuron
2, 4-D
Other (Evik)
Total acres treated with
postemergence herbicides
% of acreage treated
-1966
1,018,000
234,278
11,930
40,382
9,002
295,592
29
12,691
6,305
80,469
99,465
10
1968
783,000
294,350
6,130
31,841
26,749
359,070
53
20,790
4,905
53,811
79,506
12
1970
722,000
12,205
353,452
20,870
2,375
20,507
3,960
413,369
65
10,452
1,625
35,595
250
47,922
8
                     Source:  Madden, C.  (modified)

-------
                 Table A-11 Acreage of Cotton Crop Treated with
                             various Herbicides,  in Tennessee,
                             199-1970 35

Total acres planted
Preemergence Herbicides
Diuron (Karmax)
Fluometuron (Cotoran)
Nitralin (Planavin)
Prometryne (Caparol)
Trifluralin (Treflan)
Others (DCPA, and Norea)
Total acres treated with
preemergence herbicides
% acreage treated
4
Postemergence Herbicides
Herbicidal Oil
DSMA or MSMA + Surfactant
DSMA or MSMS + Karmex
DSMA or MSMA + Caparol
DSMA or MSMA + Cotoran
DSMA or MSMA -1- Herban
Total acres treated with
postemergence herbicides
% of acreage treated
Lay-By Herbicides
Diuron (Karmex)
Fluometuron (Cotoran)
Linuron (Lorox)
Total acres treated
% of acreage treated
1966
410,000

158,382
45,914


104,985
11,345

320,626
78


3,755
74,275
23,800
2,100
6,750


110,680
22






1968
392,462

70,440
115,815
34,710

92,262
19,840

333,067
94


6,600
93,640
28,300
3,000
17,515
6,750

155,805
44

15,500
6,275
5,050
26,825
8
1970
425,000

63,520
144,811
48,414
8,000
129,669
3,834

398,248
96


750
155,051
63,182
45,700
32,010
2,100

298,793
72

6,496
5,750
2,100
14,346
4
Source:  Hadden, C.  (modified)
                                  50

-------
        Table A-12 Acreage of Soybeans Treated with Various
                    Herbicides, in Tennessee
                    1966-197035

Total acres planted
Preemergence Herbicides
Alachlor (Lasso)
Amiben
DCPA (Dacthal)
DNBP (Dinitro)
DNBP + Napatalam (Dyanap)
Linuron (lorox)
Naptalan + Chlorpropham (Solo)
Nitralin (Planavin)
Trifluralin (Treflan)
Others (Paraquat, Naptalam
+ Chloropham (Alanap)
Total acres treated with
preemergence herbicides
% of acreage treated
Post emergence Herbicides
Chloroxuron (Tenoran)
Herbicidal Oil
DNBP (Dinitro)
Linuron (Lorox)
2, 4-DB
Other (2, 4-D)
Total acres treated with
postemergence herbicides
% of acreage treated
1966
933,000


33,275



14,345
24,470

85,850

223

158,163
17

6,740
9,484


95,858


112,082
12
1968
1,268,000


70,985



115,840
58,025
65,155
109,808

29,495

449,308
41

87,399
8,530


85,098


181,027
17
1970
1,293,000

27,395
67,870
1,007
12,585
72,893
161,756
11,700
94,681
186,777

,1,250

637,914
50

131,950
50
6,750
5,275
159,154
10,050

313,229
25
Source:  Hadden, C. (modified)
                                  51

-------
                            e.  Kentucky
       The major crops grown in Kentucky are corn, tobacco, soybeans,
hay and small grains.   The overall agricultural gross product increased
                                                                         36
approximately 350 million dollars during an eight year period (1960-1968).
Much of this increase  is attributable to pesticide  usage.
       A survey of pesticide usage and sales was conducted in 1968 by the
                                                                    36
Division of Environmental Services  of the State Department of Health.
Information obtained by this survey  indicated that a total of 2, 850, 734
pounds of pesticides were sold during that year.   (Table A-13).   Of the
total,herbicides accounted for 56. 1%,insecticides 31.4%, and fungicides
"12%.  The remainder  (. 5%) was rodenticides.
       Of the total sales  of insecticides,  chlorinated hydrocarbons
accounted for 69.4%,  organophosphates 16.8%, carbamates 9.0%
and miscellaneous 4. 7%.
       The use  of DDT on tobacco in Kentucky has been banned as is
the case for other states.  Additionally, the state has banned the use
of Aldrin-fertilizer  mixture on tobacco.
                           f. South Carolina
       The major crops grown in South Carolina  are cotton,  peaches,
peanuts, soybeans,  corn  and vegetables.
       Estimates on herbicide usage on cotton, corn, soybeans,  small
grains and pastures are given in Table A-14.  This information is based
on herbicide usage surveys conducted in various  counties  and districts
                                     37
in 1968 by the State  Extension Service.
       A  majority of the  cotton crop and  approximately one-half of the
corn was  treated with  pre emergence herbicides.  (Table A-14).
                                52

-------
               Table A-13  Amounts of Various Pesticides
                           Sold in Kentucky in 196836
  Pesticides	Amount used in pounds

                            INSECTICIDES
                      CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS

Product

DDT                                                       151,015
Chlordane                                                 127,778
Aldrin                                                    101,079
Rothane  (TDE)                                              94,449
Methoxychlor                                               46,967
Toxaphene                                                  29,881
Dieldrin                                                   26,979
Endosulfan  (Thiodan)                                       21,393
Kelthane                                                    8,898
Lindane                                                     4,025
BHC                                                         3,456
Heptachlor                                                  2,347
Tedion                                                      1,407
Endrin                                                        5QQ
                                              Total       620,174


                        ORGANO-PHOSPHATE

Product
Malathion                                                  51,467
Diazinon                                                   20,728
Parathion                                                  19,799
Di-syston                                                  18,858
Dibrom  (Naled)                                             14,800
Guthion                                                    11,899
Systox  (Demeton)                                            6,000
Ethion                                                      1,975
Ciodrin                                                     1,347
Korlan  (Ronnel)                                               984
Cygon (Dimethoate)                                            871
Phosdrin                                                      720
DDVP (Vapona)                                                 536

                                (5)
                                                              394
                                             Total        150,378

*  Pesticides of less than 500 pounds are grouped under miscellaneous.

                                  53

-------
                                  Table A-13
                                  (continued)
                             RODENTICIDES
Product

Warfarin
Arsenic Trioxide
Zinc Phosphide
Prolin

Miscellaneous Rodenticides (4)
                                               Total
  9,482
  2,916
  1,270
    699

    232

 14,599
                                HERBICIDES
Product

Methyl Bromide
MH  (Maleic Hydrazide)
Atrizine
2,  4-D Amine & 2, 4-D LV
Sodium Chlorate
Diphenamide (Enide)
2,  4, 5-T
Dalapon
Trifluralin (Treflan)
Alanap (NPA)
Eptam
Amiben
Calcium Methanearsonate
Vernolate  (Vernam)
Sodium Arsenite
Linuron (lorox)
DCPA (Dacthal)
CIPC
Simazine
Solan
DSMA
Paraquat
Sutan
Sodium Metaborate
Picloram (Tordon)
Dinitrocresol
Chloroxuron (Tenoran)
Planavin
Casoron
Vorlex
Hyvar (Isocil)
431,788
352,956
200,679
142,248
 99,047
 49,359
 38,356
 30,079
 22,001
 22,794
 19,373
 18,224
 16,670
 15,845
 14,580
 14,376
 13,513
 10,420
 11,498
  9,090
  8,294
  7,184
  6,387
  4,711
  4,030
  3,532
  3,369
  2,500
  2,454
  2,440
  2,400
                                      54

-------
                                  Table A-13
                                   (continued)
_  J                             CARBAMATES
Product                         	
Carbaryl (Sevin)                                           80,704

                                               Total       80,704


                              MISCELLANEOUS
Lead Arsenate                                              31,467
Pyrethrims                                                  3,076
Piperonyl Butoxide                                          3,025
Rotenone                                                    2,254
()the£ Mi£C£lLaneou£  (9)
                                                            1,952

                                               Total       41,774
                                FUNGICIDES
Product

Sulfur                                                    126,180
Copper Sulphate                                           107,772
Captan                                                     38,590
Zineb                                                      20,620
Maneb                                                      20,527
Ferbam                                                      8,010
Lime Sulphur                                                6,062
Phaltan                                                     5,905
Cyprex                                                      3,210
Di thane  (Nabam)                                             1,168
Polyram  (Metiram)                                           1,168
Botran                                                      1,200
Thiram                                                        760
Ml£cella£emis Zu£gicides_(4)                                1,523

                                              Total       342,695
                                      55

-------
                                  Table A-13
                                  (continued)

                              (Herbicides  Continued)

Metham (Vapam)                                              2,118
Balan                                                       1.614
Banvel-D                                                    1,600
Dazomet (Mylone)                                            1,600
Silvex                                                      1,240
Diuron (Karmex)                                             1,200
Monuron (Telvar)                                            1,200
Aminotriazole                                               1,006
CDAA (Randox)                                                 890
Endothall                                                     600

Miscellanemis Herbicides_(21)                               7,145

                                               Total    1,600,410

	Grand Total    2,850,734

    Source:  Moore, E. E. (modified)
                                      56

-------
                 Table A-14
Herbicides Usage (acres treated) on
Important Crops in South Carolina
(1968)37
Crop & Treatment
  Total Acres     Acres Treated     %  Treated
   Planted
Cotton
Preplant (incorporated)
Preplant (incorporated
          plus premergence)
Treflan or Planavin
Postemergence (early and
     326,585
                   295,141
                    48,380
90
15
mid season)
Lay-by
Total Acres Treated
Corn
Preemergence-Atrazine
Postemergence
Total Acres Treated
Sovbeans
Preplant (incorporated)
Treflan or Planavin
Preemergence
Postemergence-Tenoran
2,4,0-B
Total Acreas Treated
Small Grains
Postemergence
Permanent Pastures
Postemergence
Coastal Bermuda
Simazine
158,690
73,900
576,111
378,200
168,508
126,333
294,841

1,001,000
409,234
56,588
160,485
193,426
819,733
252,250
108,840
749,880
217,465
13,234
47
23

45
33

41
6
16
19

43
29
5
Source:  Nolan, C. N. (modified)
                                       57

-------
Additionally, most of the soybeans and much of the acreage planted to
                                                   37
small grains also received application of herbicides.
       t
       The herbicides used in large quantities during 1968-70 were
                                                                  38
Treflan,  Atrazine, 2,4-D, DSMA,  MSMA and Tenoran (Table A-15).
       Quantitative information on pesticide usage,  particularly with
respect to insecticides and fungicides,  is lacking.

                             g. Georgia
       The important crops of Georgia which are extensively treated
with herbicides are cotton, corn,  peanuts, soybeans  and pastures.  The
most commonly used herbicides for weed control in these crops were
Treflan,  Planavin, Cotoran,  Karmex, CIPC,  DSMA, MSMA, Lor ox,
Caparol, Sutan, Atrazine,  Lasso, 2,4-D, Banvel D,  Vernam, Balan,
                                                               •3 a At)
Sesone, DNBP, Amiben, 2,4-DB, Dyanap,  Tenoran and 2, 4, 5-T.'
       Herbicide usage survey data indicated that the acreages of all
crops treated with herbicides increased considerably from  1965-1971.
(Table A-16).  Prior to 1971, information on acreage of corn and soy-
beans which received herbicidal treatment but no tillage, was not
     _ , 39,40
reported.
       Presently, no information is available on the  quantities  of
insecticides and fungicides used in the state.

                           h.  Mississippi
       The most important crops grown in Mississippi are cotton
soybeans and corn.  Some of the commonly used herbicides for weed
control in cotton and soybeans were Treflan,  Planavin,  Cotoran,  Karmex,
Telvar, Lorox,  herbicidal oil,  MSMA + Karmex, MSMA, Amiben,  Dyanap,
                               58

-------
               Table A-15 Amounts of Major Herbicides Used
                           in South Carolina During 1968-1970
Herbicide
Treflan
Planavin
Atrazine
Simazine
Karmex
Cotoran
Herban
Tenoran
Lorox
2,4-D
2,4-DB
Banvel, 2,4,5-T etc.
Dyanap & Dinitro
MSMA & DSMA
Lasso & Amiben
and others
Total
1968
245,000
15,000
190,000
10,000
30,000
25,000
15,000
115,000
80,000
240,000
20,000
15,000
20,000
160,000
10,000
1,190,000
Pounds of Active Ingredient
1969
265,000
35,000
195,000
15,000
30,000
35,000
25,000
135,000
85,000
250,000
30,000
15,000
45,000
175,000
10,000
1.345.000
1970
295,000
50,000
260,000
20,000
25,000
40,000
30,000
140,000
100,000
250,000
40,000
20,000
55,000
185,000
20,000
1,530,000
Source:   Nolan, C. N. (modified)
                                    59

-------
   Table A-16  Acreage of Various Crops Treated with Herbicides in Georgia (1965-1969)
                                                                                      39,40
Crop and Treatment
Cotton
Preplant and preemergence
Postemergence
Total
Corn
Preplant and preemergence
Postemergence
Total of preplant, preemergence &
Postemergence
No Tillage (Atrazine + paraquat)
Peanuts
Preplant
Pre or post emergence
Total
Soybeans
Preplant and preemergence
Postemergence
Total
No Tillage (Paraquat)
Pastures
Postemergence
Fence rows or noncrop land
1965

403,117

403,117

164,332
2,389

166,721


66,797
229,575
296,372

17,832

17,832




Acres treated with herbicides
1966 1967 1968 1969

347,625
62,883
410,508

162,831
199,754

362,585


151,514
259,862
411,376

95,395
11,495
106,890

'
252,216


292,875
67,402
360,277

272,482
347,971

620,453


273,652
180,369
454,021

191,020
45,467
236,487


311,324


356,247
180,829
537,076

309,847
380,489

690,336


387,039
107,007
494,046

190,065
42,696
232,761


342,515


372,460
-168,732
541,192

412,309
373,655

785,964


430,503
173,667
604,170

236,858
49,583
286,441


350,816

1971

483,415
263,614
747,029

536,514
478,916

1,015,430
6,962

515,359
319,012
834,371
-
333,655
142,855
476,510
10,980

325,465
29,010
*1970 data  not available
Source:   Swann,  C. W.  (modified)

-------
                                                      41
Lasso, Solan, Dinitro, Tenoran,  2,4-DB,  and Wax bar.

       Cotton and soybeans acreages treated with herbicides increased

each year from 1968-1970 (Table A-17).  This trend in herbicide usage

is similar  to that observed for most of the  other Southeastern states.

       Information on insecticide usage for 1970 indicated that

1, 371, 000  acres of cotton were treated for control of cotton boll-worms
               42
and boll  -weevil.   The major types and quantities of insecticides applied

•were as  follows:

       •   Toxaphene - 8. 5 million pounds at an average rate of 2 Ibs.
            per acre.

       •   Methyl parathion -5.5 million  pounds at an average rate
            of 0. 5 Ib. /acre

       •   DDT - 3 million pounds at the rate of 1 Ib.  per acre.

       Presently, no  information on insecticides and fungicides is
available.


                          6.  Conclusions


       Most pesticides used in the Southeastern United State are

directed towards the following major pests:

       •   Insects: Cotton boll weevil,  cotton bollworm, tobacco
            budworm,  tobacco hornworm,  scale insects of citrus,
            cabbage lopper,  pink bollworm, codling moth and mealy
            bugs.

       •   Weeds:  Broad leaf weeds, rag weed,  Johnson grass,  pigweed,
            crab grass, barn-yard grass,  green and yellow foxtails,water
            hyacinth and goose weed.

       9   Disease:  Citrus melanose,  citrus and apple scab,  leaf spot
            disease  of peanuts,  wild fire of tobacco and cotton,  anthracnose
            of tobacco and cotton, root rots of corn, fire blight of apple,
            downy mildew of beans, leaf  spot of apples, beans and cotton.

-------
    Table A-17  Cotton and Soybeans Acreage  Planted,  and Treated with
                Herbicides in Mississippi (1968- 1970)41
Crop & Treatment                  1968           1969          1970


Cotton

  Total acres planted                          1,120,079     1,151,552

  Total acres treated
      (preemergence)              1,232,036      1,548,084     1,335,432

  Total acres treated
      (postemergence)            1,359,215      1,857,323     2,127,899


Soybeans

  Total acres planted                          2,214,360     2,292,425

  Total acres treated             964,050      1,866,550     1,637,795
      (preemergence)

  Total acres treated             683,625      1,374,135     1,539,288
	(postemergence)	^^

Source:  Anderson, K. L.  (modified)
                                   62

-------
       An accurate inventory of pesticide usage is needed to determine
present trends and provide a basis for making future projections on
pesticide usage.  Additionally,  inventory information is  required to
determine the extent and trends of environmental pollution by pesticide
usage.  This is particularly important with respect to the usage of
persistent pesticides.
       Information on pesticide usage (quantities used and acreage
treated)  is presently not available mainly because distributors, sellers
and users of pesticides  are not required to report specific information
regarding pesticides sold or applied,  to any responsible agency.
       The most recent information available from U. S. Department
of Agriculture concerning quantities of pesticides  used by farmers on
a regional level is  five years old (1966).  Certain  information is
availabe for pesticide usage in  a few states (e. g. Kentucky and
Tennessee) where  special surveys were conducted.  These surveys
only represent a one year compilation.   In most of the Southeastern
states herbicide usage surveys have been conducted  more regularly
than for  any other  group of pesticides.  Herbicide usage, on various
importnat crops of the Southeast, has increased considerably during
the past  few years.
       In the  southeastern United States, the most widely used
herbicides are Treflan, Dalapon, 2,4-D, Atrazine,  Planavin,  Cotoran,
DSMA, MSMA,  EPTC, Dinitro, Balan,  Lorax, Simazine,  Methyl bromide
and Maleic hydrazide.
       Most commonly  recommended and used insecticides in the
Southeast are Toxaphene, BHC, Parathion, Malathion, Disyston,
Systox, Carbaryl,  Methyl  arathion,  Diazinon,  DDT and Chlordane.
DDT has been used extensively to control insects in  cotton, tobacco and
other crops.  However, its use is decreasing, while that of Toxaphene,

                                   63

-------
Parathion, Malathion and Methyl parathion is increasing.  Mirex has
been very extensively applied to control fire ants in the Southeast.
       Insecticide applications to cotton in the Southeast exceed the
combined total for all other major crops. A similar situation exists
with fungicides applied to citrus.
       The most commonly recommended fungicides in the Southeast
are Sulfur,  copper sulfate, Captan, Zineb,  Maneb,  Cyprex,  Dithane,
Botran,  Thiram and Ziram.
       Practically all Southeastern soils used for agricultural purposes
are subject to moderate or severe runoff and erosion.  Soils in a large
portion of Florida are an exception because lack of adequate drainage
is a severe problem.  Soil erosion and runoff problems could be
reduced  by proper management practices.

                        7.  Recommendations
1.  A national and state reporting mechanism for documenting,  as
accurately as possible,  the total quantities of pesticides used should
be established.  Initially,  the reporting procedure should be established
at primary and secondary levels to provide  a cross  reference.  Pesticide
manufacturers would represent the primary level while state or county
pesticide distributors could represent secondary level.
2.  The Economic Research Service of the U.' S. Department of Agriculture
should reestablish its program of compilation and publication of
information on use of pesticides. However,  the information should be
published on a state as well as regional basis.
3.  Growers should be encouraged to use less persistent pesticides as
they become available.
                                  64

-------
4.  The U S. Department of Agriculture through its Extension Service
should encourage growers to use cultural and management practices
which minimize loss of sediment.  Special emphasis should be placed
on areas in which most pesticides are applied.
                                 65

-------
                             8. References
 1.  Davis,  V.  W., Fox,  A. S. ,  Jenkins,  R. P. and Andrilenas,  P. A.,
     Economic  Consequences of Restricting the use of Orgranochlorine
     Insecticides on Cotton, Corn,  Peanuts and Tobacco,  USDA Publi-
     cation Agricultural Economic Report No.  178,  52,  1970.

 2.  Campbell,  J. P., Statement of Under Secretary of Agriculture
     Before the House Committee on Agriculture, 1-12, 1971.

 3.  Metcalf, R.  L. ,  Pesticides, A Primer  on Agricultural Pollution,
     A Publication of  Soil Conservation Society of America,  14-17,  1971.

 4.  Anonymous, Agricultural Statistics, U. S. Department of Agri-
     culture, 627, 1970.

 5.  Anonymous, Soil, Yearbook of Agriculture U. S. Department of
     Agriculture, 784, 1957.

 6.  Donahue, R. L. ,  Shickluna, J. C. and Robertson,  L. S. ,  Soils -
     An Introduction  to Soils and Plant Growth, Englewood Cliff,  N. J. ,
     Prentice-Hall, Inc., 142-75, 1971.

 7.  Anonymous, Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control,
     Washington, D. C.,  National Academy of Sciences,  3,  360-446,
     1969.                                             ~

 8.  Anonymous, Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control,
     Washington, D. C. ,  National Academy of Sciences,  2_,  160-193,
     1968.

 9.  Torgeson,  D.  C., Fungicides  and Nematicides:  Their  Role Now and
     in Future,  J. Environ.  Quality, 1_, 14-17,  1972.

10.  Eichers, T.,  Andrilenas,  P., Jenkins, R. , and Fox,  A., Quantities
     of Pesticides used by Farmers in 1964, USDA Publication,  Agri-
     cultural Economic Report No.  131, 37,  1968.

11.  Eichers, T. , Andrilenas,  P., Blake, H. ,  Jenkins, R., and Fox,
     A. , Quantities of Pesticides used by Farmers in 1966,  USDA
     Publication, Agricultural Economic Report No.  179,  61, 1970

12.  Eichers, T. R. ,  Estimates of Pesticides  used on Selected Crops in
     8 States in 1966,  Personal Correspondence, 1971.
                                  66

-------
                         References (continued)

13.   George,  J.  L. ,  The Program to Eradicate "the Imported Fire Ant,
     A Report to the  Conservation Foundation and the New York Zoological
     Society,  39,  1958.

14.   Hays,  K. B. , Ecological Observations on the Imported Fire Ant,
     Solenopsis saevissima richteri Forel in Alabama,  J. Alabama
     Acad.  ofSci., 3^0 (April), 1959-

15.   Shapley, D. ,  Mirex and the  Fire Ant:  Decline in Fortunes of Per-
     fect Pesticides, Science,  172,  358-360,  1971.

16.   Arant, F. S., Hays, K.  L.  and Speake,  D. W. , Facts  about the
     Imported Fire Ant,  Highlights of Agricultural Research, Auburn
     University, Auburn, Alabama,  5_(4),  1958.

17.   Blake, G. H. , Eden,  W. G. and Hays,  K.  L. Residual Effectiveness
     of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons for Control of the Imported Fire Ant,
     J. Econ. Entomol. , 52,  1-3,  1959.

18.   Lofgren, C. S. , Bartlett, F. J. , Stringer, C. E. and Banks, W. A.,
     Imported Fire Ant Toxic Bait Studies:  Further Tests with Granu-
     lated Mirex-Soybeans Oil Bait, J. Econ. Entomol., 57. 695-698,
     1964.

19.   Butler,  P. A.,  Monitoring Pesticide Pollution, Bioscience,  19,
     889-891, 1969.

20.   Burns, E., Total Acreage of Peanuts Treated with Herbicides,
     Unpublished data  (1970) from Weed Control Extension Specialist at
     Auburn University,  Auburn,  Alabama,  1971.

21.   Burns,  E. ,  Total Acreage  of Cotton Treated with Herbicides,
     Unpublished data  (1970) from Weed Control Extension Specialist at
     Auburn University,  Auburn,  Alabama,  1971.

22.   Burns,  E- ,  Total Acreage  of Corn Treated with Herbicides, Un-
     published data (1970) from Weed Control Extension Specialist at
     Auburn University,  Auburn,  Alabama,  1971.

23.   Burns, E. ,   Total Acreage  of Sorghum and Sorghum Sudan and
     Coastal Bermuda  Grass Treated with Herbicides,  Unpublished data
     (1970)  from Weed Control Extension Specialist at Auburn University,
     Auburn,  Alabama,  1971.
                                    67

-------
                         References (continued)

24.   Burns,  E. , Total Acreage of Soybeans Treated with Herbicides,
     Unpublished data (1970) from Weed Control Extension Specialist at
      Auburn University, Auburn,  Alabama,  1971.

25.   Ledbetter,  R.  J.,  Unpublished data for  1965., Compiled at the
      Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Experiment Station,
     Auburn, Alabama, 1971.

26.   Ledbetter,  R.  J. ,  Unpublished data for  1966, Compiled at the
      Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Experiment Station,
     Auburn, Alabama, 1971.

27.   Ledbetter,  R.  J.,  Unpublished data for  1967, Compiled at the
      Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Experiment Station,
     Auburn, Alabama,  1971.

28.   Ledbetter,  R.  J. ,  Unpublished data for  1968, Compiled at the
      Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Experiment Station,
      Auburn, Alabama,  1971.

29-   Ledbetter,  R.  J. ,  Unpublished data for  1969, Compiled at the
      Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Experiment Station,
      Auburn, Alabama,  1971.

30.   Ledbetter,  R.  J. ,  Unpublished data 1970,  Compiled at the
      Cooperative Extension Service, Agricultural Experiment Station,
      Auburn, Alabama,  1971.

31.   Currey, W. L. , Unpublished data on Herbicide Usage in Florida,
      University of Florida, Gainesville,  Florida, Personal correspon'-
      dence, 1971.

32.   Anonymous, Fertilizer, Lime, Soil Amendments,  Pesticides and
      Other Chemicals  - Current Status, Trends and Projections- DARE
      Report - Florida Agricultural Plans for the 1970's.  University of
      Florida,  Publication No.  7,  163-72,  1969-

33.   Badenhop,  M.  B. and Hunter, T.  K. , Utilization of Pesticides by
      Tennessee  Vegetable  Growers, Tennessee Agr.  Exp. Sta.  Bull 449
      34,  1968.

34.   Thornton, G. F. ,  A Summary of Pesticide Use and Pesticide C
      tainer Disposition in Tennessee Agriculture, A Publication of
      Tennessee  State Department of Agriculture, 8,  1970.
                                    68

-------
                         References (continued)

35.   Hadden, G. , Unpublished data (1970) on Herbicides Usage in Corn,
     Cotton and Soybeans in Tennessee,  University of Tennessee,  Knoxville,
     Tennessee, 1971.

36.   Moore, E.  E.,  Pesticides Sales and Usage in Kentucky in 1968,
     A Publication of the State Department of Health, Frankfort, Kentucky,
     16, 1968.

37.   Nolan,  C.  N. , Herbicide Usage  - South Carolina, Clems on University,
     Clemson, S. C. ,  Unpublished Information for 1968, 1971.

38.   Nolan,  C.  N. , Major Herbicides Used in South Carolina on Crops,
     Pastures and Non-Crops (1968-1970).  Unpublished data, Clemson
     University, Clemson, S. C. ,  1971.

39-   Swarm, C.  W. ,  Summary of Herbicide Usage in Georgia.  University
     of Georgia, Athens,  Georgia, Unpublished data (1965-69), 1971.

40.   Swann, C.  W. ,  Summary of Herbicide Usage in Georgia.  University
     of Georgia, Athens,  Georgia, Unpublished data  1971.
                                      *\
41.   Anderson,  K. L. , Herbicide Usage Survey in Mississippi,  Mississippi
     State University,  State College,  Mississippi,  Unpublished data (1968-
     1970), 1971.

42.   Sartor,  C.  F. ,  Unpublished Information on Insecticide Usage on
     Cotton in Mississippi (1970), Mississippi State University, State
     College,  Mississippi,  1971.
                                   69

-------
                    B.  APPLICATION TECHNIQUES
                                     AND
                         TYPES OF PESTICIDE

                            1.  Introduction
       Economic control and safety have been twin objectives of pest
control for many years; however, both goals have been elusive.   The
failure of the pest control profession to establish reasonable economic
thresholds and reticence of farmers to accept those available have led
to many problems associated with the use and misuse of insecticides.
The problems relative to resistance,  disruption of natural control, and
pollution have proven much more difficult to evaluate.  The  price of
ignoring ecosystem contamination has been  high.   It appears clear
that steps must be  taken to reduce the contamination by pesticides of .soil,
water, and air as well as  on non-target organisms and man.
       Efficient pest control using  pesticides depends upon selection of
proper pesticides,  application at the proper time and the use of equip-
ment that can efficiently place the toxicant in the microenvironment  of
the pest.  Of the total pesticides applied,  no more than 2% is effective.
The remainder  is indicative of the inefficiency of the existing application
techniques.
       Careful  selection of existing methods would  considerably  reduce
the amount of pesticide  required for effective pest control; with a
concomitant  decrease  in contamination of the ecosystem.  Major  benefits
would accrue from improved pesticide delivery systems.  The answer
to the past problem, therefore, does not lie in increasing still further
the use of pesticides.  It lies in increasing  the use of safe pesticides and
                                 70

-------
in increasing the efficiency of application techniques.

             2.  Pesticide Application Methods and Equipment
       Pesticide formulation is an important factor in selecting the mosf
appropriate method of application.  Pesticide formulations can be grouped
on the basis of physical state as solid materials, liquids (common  "spray"
materials) and gases.  Dust, granules, baits and seed dressings are the
most common forms of  solids.  Sprays are formulated as  solution.!?,  wettab'e
powders and emulsions.  Gases are generally used in confined spaces such
as greenhouses,  seed storage areas,  or for  soil fumigation.  A fumigation
effect is also created by foggers which produce effects similar to gaseous
forms of pesticides.
       Pesticides may be applied  as a broadcast,  in narrow bands, individual
spot treatments, or directed to a particular  part of the plant.

                              a.  Sprays
       A major portion  of pesticides (herbicides,  fungicides and insecticides)
are applied as sprays.   In 1964, 46% of the farmers in the southeastern
                                                                        3
U. S.  owned power-driven sprayers compared to 23% who owned dusters.
Since then custom spraying, primarily by aircraft, has increased.
       Sprayers are classified as  high volume  sprayers, low volume (LV)
sprayers and ultra low volume (ULV) sprayers.  High volume sprayers
apply from 30 to 500 gallons of spray per acre; low volume sprayers from
one to 30 gallons per acre; and ULV concentrated formulations  in amounts
                              4
less than two quarts per acre.   Most spray equipment utilize pumps,
nozzles and booms to produce the  different types of spray.  Some examples
of ground-ope rated  sprayers are the following:
                                  71

-------
       •   Hydraulic sprayers in which the liquid mixture is
           forced through a spraying system and released onto
           the target area,
       •   Multipurpose sprayers which are designed to operate
           over a range of pressures varying from very high to
           very low and are primarily used for orchard spraying,
       •   Conventional low pressure, low volume sprayers
           which are equipped with a boom and with nozzles that
           are suitable for LV and ULV sprays,
       •   High pressure,  high volume sprayers which are
           employed for thorough  coverage of plants having
           dense foliage (e.g. bushes, vines,  and truck crops), and
       •   Air blast sprayers which utilize a blast of air to propel
           sprays in LV.  Small droplets are created.

       Improvements have  been in ground equipment used to apply  ULV
sprays.  The major problem was the inability to adequately regulate the
flow rate of the pesticide.  This problem was solved by using drilled
discs or small metering valves mounted in the insecticide lines.
Stainless steel or plastic tanks  were used to hold the insecticide and,
in some models,  filters  were installed to help eliminate nozzle stoppage.
       Aerial application of pesticides, either from fixed-winged planes
or helicopters, utilizes a modification of conventional low-volume, low-
pressure hydraulic spray, dust, or granular application techniques.  The
most common dispersal apparatus used on aircraft is the pump, boom,
and nozzle spray system.  Spray-deposit patterns are adjusted by  shifting
nozzle locations on the boom.  Droplet size can be varied by changing the
pump pressure, the orifice size in each nozzle, or the nozzle direction
in the slipstream of the aircraft.   The application rate is changed  by
increasing or decreasing nozzle size or number of nozzles in the boom 5
Some types of aerial spraying equipment are:
       o   Fixed wing aircraft of  single  or multiengine types, equipped
           with boom and nozzles used mostly to apply spray in LV"
           ULV range, 5 and
                                   72

-------
       •   Helicopters which utilize air blast of the rotors for
           increased droplet impingement.

       One of the more serious shortcomings of fixed-wing aircraft
as a pesticide applicator  is that the underleaf coverage may be less than
with ground application or helicopter applications.   Rotor downwash of the
helicopter ensures that there is a minimal drift of materials to adjoining
fields.   Helicopters have the advantage over fixed-wing aircraft in
maneuverability and landing and consequently less time  is lost in
ferrying.  They are better  suited in small fields.  Helicopter operators
cannot increase their  speed of application without sacrificing,  uniformity
in coverage.  The necessary low speed coupled with the low capacity is
a disadvantage from the  cost standpoint where large areas are involved.
These advantages and disadvantages must be weighed in determining the
most effective,  economical system.
       Improvements in  nozzles and booms are directed toward  reducing
the volume of spray required for effective pest control.  Recently developed
microfoil booms produce droplets  of nearly uniform size and reduce drift.
Spinning-disc or screen-cage nozzles,  such as the Mini-Spin and Micronair
                                   8 9
nozzles, have a similar capability.  '   Hydraulic nozzles with flat fan tips,
also produce droplets of  acceptable  sizes, and are relatively inexpensive.
However,  problems exist with the  degradation of the diaphragms and
erosion of the tip orifices.   Another type of nozzle,  the  hollow-cone,  produces
droplets larger  than those produced by nozzles previously discussed.
Air curtain nozzles have  been developed to be used in conjunction with the
techniques of electrostatic  charging of the spray droplets.
                                b.  Dusts
       The development of dusting equipment is less advanced than that of
spray equipment.  Dusting appliances operate on the principle of emitting
                                   73

-------
a blast of air in which the dust particles are airborne.  Rotary-type
dusters, in which dust is fed onto fan blades,  are used for ground
application.  Aerial dusting,  which was extensively employed for many
years in the Southeast, is decreasing.12  Aerial dusters are categorized
           7
as follows:
        •    Standard dusters which consist of hopper, wind-driven
            agitator, a feed control gate and a spreader suspended
            below the fuselage,
        •    Breeches-type duster in which the lower part  of the
            hopper leads to the shutters and the dust is emitted into
            emission tubes located on either side  of the corner of
            the fuselage, and
        •    Suspended tank-type dusters in which  the dust  is stirred
            by a windmill type of agitator and emitted through gates
            consisting of crosswise matching  slots operated from the
            cockpit.
        Many problems inherent in the use of dusting as a  method of
pesticide  application restrict its use.  Drift hazards,  inefficient
deposition of active ingredient on the target, agglomeration and poor
settling are a few examples of the  problems.
                              c.  Granules
        Granule applicators are  designed to place in the target area pesti-
cides impregnated on a suitable  carrier, such as  corncob,  clay minerals
or walnut shells.   Although variations in design occur, basic granular
applicators consist of a hopper for the pesticide,  a mechanical-tvt>e
agitator at the base of the hopper, and a metering device, usually a  1't
type gate,  to regulate the flow of the granules.  Granules may be applied
as a broadcast or band treatment, before,  or at a plantino  Hr>-,0     •>
                                                 t-     "g  nine,  and worked
into the soil; as a postplant, side-dress application through drop tub
                                   74

-------
 and fertilizer shoes; or from the air, to penetrate foliage.  The last
 procedure is used to apply Mirex,  a slow-release pesticide used for
                                13
 fire ant control in the Southeast.
                                d.  Foams
        Foam delivery is one of the recent additions to pesticide application
 methodology.    The system which produces the foam varies with the
 application.   Land-based equipment generally consists of a water pump,
 an air compressor, foam generator  and regulation module.  Various
 chemicals are utilized to improve wettability and penetration of the spray.
 Aerial foam application equipment has also been developed.   This may be
 mounted on fixed-wing aircraft or helicopters.  Depending upon the need,
 foams can be generated in a pattern varying from 1/16" droplet size to
 continuous cover similar to that dispersed by an aerosol shaving  cream
 dispenser.   Foam application is still in the experimental and trial  stage
 but the properties of the foam makes this, a desirable technique.  Foams
 have larger volume,  higher viscosity,  better structural strength  (cohe-
 siveness) and greater clinging ability against runoff than conventional sprays.
 Additionally,  foams have reduced evaporation characteristic  and drift
 hazard.  Weeds, insect and disease  control by foam application shows
 considerable  potential.

                         e.  Soil Incorporation
       Many preemergence herbicides,  some insecticides,  and fungicides,
are applied to  the soil.  For improved efficiency they may be incorporated
or injected into the soil.  Conventional tillage equipment  (discs,  harrows,
rotary tillers, etc.) are used to incorporate surf ace-applied pesticides
to varying depths.  Spray sweeps are used to pressure  inject many
volatile herbicides,  either in bands or in uniform swaths. Limited
developmental effort has been vested  in improvement of soil incorporation
equipment.
                                  75

-------
                 3.  Efficiency of Pesticide Application
        The ecological impact of widespread use and dissemination of
pesticides warrants renewed consideration of the efficiency of spray
application methods.
        The efficiency of pesticide application equipment lies in its
ability to deliver a dose capable of killing or damaging the maximum
number of pests with the minimum amount of material.   It is possible
to reduce pesticide usage significantly and still provide an effective
pest control program by generating critical droplet size and uniformly
distributing these so that the major portion of the pesticide reaches its
target.
        An increase in the efficiency of application equipment with
commensurate reduction in the quantity of pesticide required would
reduce  environmental contamination.
        The following factors are considered in determining the efficiency
of pesticide application  methods:

        •    Optimization of the pesticide  droplet size for a target,
        •    Uniformity of coverage and impingement characteristics,
        •    Persistence of residue in the microenvironment of the  pest,  and
        •    Reduced drift,  runoff and ecosystem contamination.
        Methods of application, droplet sizes, and volumes of spray are
examined in an attempt  to define these factors which might serve to
improve the  efficiency of applied pesticides.

                         a.  Spraying and Dusting
       Highly toxic pesticides make effective pest control possible with
minute quantities of toxicants provided the application method delivers
a continuous film of minimum thickness.  The manifestations of ineff  •
                                  76

-------
in pesticide application are deposition of thick deposits,  the existence of

gaps between zones of deposit, or in some cases, both.  If the gaps are
of sufficient size, the pest will escape contact and/or ingestion will

not occur.  For example, stomach insecticides intended to control white

pine weevil must be aimed to cover feeding areas which are only 0. 8 mm
in diameter.

       Foliar applied dusts  have the advantage that formulations emitted

from the machine do not evaporate.  Water-based sprays evaporate
                                                                         7
quickly before reaching the target and are inefficient in dry,  hot climates.
                                                             16
This shortcoming may be corrected by using oil as a carrier.     In such

climates soil incorporated dust applications  are better than wettable
         17
powders.     However, some disadvantages are also associated with
j  «.    ,-   <-•     7,18,19
dust applications:
            Insecticidal dusts,  when emitted from a blower,  consist
            of a mixture of discrete particles, with agglomerates,
            which may consist  of as many as 20 to 300 coalesced
            particles.  This factor of agglomeration leads to wide
            variation of settling characteristics even  in a dust
            of uniform fineness of grind.

            In addition to size,  the shape and specific gravity of dusts
            are important in deciding their settling characteristics.
            Particles of high density such as barite or lead arsenate
            show good  deposition on foliage, whereas  Derris and
            Pyre thrum dusts, whose particles are light and angular,
            give poor deposits.  Cryolite dusts deposit poorly because
            they show little agglomeration.  The fractionation of
            dusts during the settling process may also separate the
            insecticide from its diluent.  Dusts are deposited better
            on foliage nearer the blower than at greater distances,
            and more permanent deposits are produced with a strong
            air  blast.

            Comparatively dust formulations drift more than the sprays.

            The dust particles do not adhere to the plant as long as
            spray deposits.  The efficiency of pesticidal sprays is
            superior to dusts.
                                   77

-------
                                                            18
Improved efficiency of spraying over dusting is attributed to:
       •    Less drift and better deposition.  Consequently a spray
            achieves equal results with two-thirds as much pesticide
            and a single spraying may  produce the control equivalent
            to as many as four dust applications.
       •    The capability of adjusting dosage rate,  droplet  size,
            and formulation  at any time which is not possible with
            dusting.
       Generally the efficiency of pesticidal spray exceeds that of
dusting.   However,  a potential still exists for major improvement in
spray methodology.
       Spray conditions have been determined empirically because no
technically-based alternative has been available.  In spite of years of
investigations, the physical  factors critical in pesticide spray delivery
aie still largely undefined. Measurement has posed one problem.  There
has been no way to monitor pesticide spray droplets delivered to the
target until the recent development of the fluoresent particle tracer
method.   Results from the application  of pesticide sprays were difficult
to correlate with the conditions existing at the time of application.  Such
results are based mainly on the biological  evaluation of pest levels over
intervals  of days, weeks, or even months after the pesticide application.
       Despite these problems,  progress has been made in pesticide
application technology.  This has involved  primarily ULV application
techniques, optimum droplet size and improved impingement.

                      b.  Ultra Low Volume Spray
       The development of the ULV method ranks as one of the most
significant improvements in spray methodology.  Application of an
undiluted  pesticide in volumes of 1/2 gallon or less per acre is refe    d
                                 78

-------
to as ULV.  A  pesticide is considered undiluted if nothing is added
                                 4
after it leaves the  manufacturer.   Actually,  ULV is a relative term
reflecting the progress primarily of aerial spraying  since its initiation
during World War II.  At that time,  the generally accepted application
rates varied from 30 to 40 gallons per acre.  Eventually, as pesticide
formulations improved, the application rates were reduced to as little
as one gallon per acre.  Each incremental reduction in the total gallonage
was referred to as "low volume" spraying.
        For many years,  pest control officials contended that at least
one gallon of spray per acre was the absolute minimum that could be
applied by aircraft and still adequately cover the area regardless of
the vegetation involved.  Thus, when the one gallon per acre barrier
was broken, it was logical to refer to this as ULV spraying.
        Advantages of ULV application of pesticides over higher spray
volumes are that:
        •    It makes possible spray application with  most droplets in
            the 5-50  (j. diameter range.  These were once considered
            to  be beyond the range of commercial reality. 2> 4, 10,21
        •    To some extent, ULV spray reduces the  amount of toxicant
            applied, and the potential hazard to the total environ -
            ment. 10. 16,22,23
        •    ULV-applied insecticides have more residual toxicity than
            water-diluted sprays and are  more resistant to washoff
            by rainfall. 24' 25
        o    Savings result from the  reduction or elimination of
            diluents.   This is a major factor in reduced aerial
            application costs. 1(>»"»26
        •    Relatively nonevaporative quality of the undiluted ULV
            pesticides has permitted aircraft to fly higher, making
            it possible to double and triple effective swath widths.^7' 28
                                    79

-------
       Weather conditions are especially important in ULV applications
because the slightest wind carries minute amounts beyond the intended
area.   '    A hazard exists to the applicator who is handling concentrated
pesticides under these conditions because of the increased degree of
exposure. Sufficient research has not been conducted to fully exploit
the ULV technique.  Aircraft spray dispersal and pesticide formulations
must be improved.  Hazards to nontarget organisms from pesticides
applied by ULV also need considerable delineation.
                            c.  Droplet Size
       The optimum size for pesticide spray droplets that must be
generated is one of the most elusive of all the factors which affect the
efficiency of insecticide sprays.  The optimum size for pesticide
droplets is that which gives maximum control of the target pests with
minimum pesticide and minimum ecosystem contamination.   It has
been hypothesized by one investigator that the ratio of recommended
dose to that needed for insect control would be the order of 1, 000:1
if droplets of the optimum size  were used.  1   Current practice requires
much lower ratios.
       It is generally believed that spray droplets of 50 ji diameter or
smaller  are the most effective for the control of insects.30 Such small
droplets are subject to atmospheric transport and diffusion but they
effectively penetrate the microenvironment of the pest. Spray droplets
of 50-100 ,1   have marginal efficiency.  Droplets  larger than 100 |u.
are the least effective in insect control programs because they do not
become airborne and are simply deposited on the ground or on
peripheral foliage.  These are critical locations for potential entr
into the ecosystem and are of little use in pest control.   Table B
                                 80

-------
                   TABLE B-l  Spray Droplet Size as a Factor in Ecosystem Contamination.
            Range of droplet
            diam Qi) 	
Range of % by mass in an
avg commercial spray	
Point of deposition
in ecosystem	
Potential  for Major
ecosystem  contamination
                220-340
                100-220
                 41-100
CO
                 10-40
          29
          63
           0.14
       (usually less
        than 1-5%)
Ground, ground forage,
peripheral  foliage,
target area crops

Ground, ground forage,
peripheral foliage,
drift to adjacent
areas, crops

Throughout most foli-
age, smaller size
range effective in
deep foliage penetra-
tion drift to adja-
cent areas

Maximum contact with
target insects dis-
tributed widely by
atmospheric trans-
port and diffusion	
Extremely high by  in-
gestion and washing pro-
cesses into watershed

Extremely high by  in-
gestion and washing pro-
cesss into watershed
Wide distribution of
minimum volume of de-
posit minimizes major
entry into arthropod
and vertebrate eco-
systems

Minor component of most
insecticide sprays.  Re-
presents minimum amount
of insecticide
                 Source:  Himel, C. M.

-------
                                                                                  19
                              TABLE B-2  The Effect of Atomization on Coverage.
00
ISJ
Droplet
Diameter,
a»>
10
20
50
100
200
300
cnn

Droplet
Volume ,
( cu ^l)
525
4,200
65,520
525,000
4,200,000
14,175,000

Number of droplets
per sq in. a
1,148,100
143,190
9,224
1,164
142
43
9

                    Source:  Brown, A. W. A.
                    Q
                    Number of droplets per unit area for an application of 1 gal/acre.

-------
gives ecosystem contamination as a function of spray droplet size.
       The number of spray droplets available from a given volume of
liquid spray is an inverse function of diameter cubed. A better
understanding of the discussion of small droplet compared to large
droplets can be obtained from Table B-2.  The number of droplets
falling on a unit area decreases from about 10, 000 per square inch  when
their diameter is 50 (j. to only 40 when their diameter is 300 (i .
Proportionally, the volume of pesticide (Table B-2) carried in a droplet
increases  considerably  as the size of the droplet increases.  This is
the major  reason for the undesirability of large droplets.
       The optimum droplet sizes for insecticides used to control
many major pests in the Southeast have not determined.     Only a
few pests (house flies,  mosquitoes, boll weevil,  cotton bollworm,
cabbage  looper and spruce budworm, etc.)  have been studied in this
regard.  For house flies,  it has been determined that the optimum
droplet diameter for maximum economy of the insecticide is  22 (j,
                                                  32
Smaller  droplet sizes are required for mosquitoes.
       The droplet deposition on the cotton insects studied in Georgia
provides an interesting  analysis (Table B-3).   The maximum-sized
droplet of  4331  measured on 139 boll weevils was one of 63 jo.
diameter.   These boll weevils were in a highly protected environ-
ment during spraying (9 a.m.  Aug. 1, 1967 at Tifton, Ga.).   A
free-flying insect like the boll weevil should have been subjected to a
significantly higher probability of contracting droplets of the  larger
                                       18
size ranges existing ui the distribution.
       Regardless of the initial droplet size distribution, an
examination of target species reveals  that only a critical droplet
size range has been effective.   This is exemplified by two case studies
                                                                2
from different parts of the country and on different target species.

                                  83

-------
In a complex mountain-forest biophysical system relatively fewer spray
droplets were found on spruce budworms than on cotton insects
(Table B-3).  The diameters of the maximum-size spray droplet in the
spray droplet spectrum, D     of the spruce budworm and cotton insect
sprays were 350 (i  and 950 |jt  , respectively.  In each of these foliage
systems, droplets greater than 120|j.  diameter were found on peripheral
and ground level foliage,  or on artificial targets placed in open areas.
Large droplets did not reach the target insects.   The question raised
is whether large droplets  ( > 100^ diameter) play any essential part in
the control of insects which live in a foliage environment?  Yet these
larger droplets  constitute  90-95% or more of many insecticide sprays.
The answer is the key to devising more efficient insecticide application
techniques, to reducing the amount of spray drift, and to reduce
contamination of the ecosystem.  The data,  summarized in Table B-3,
demonstrate that the limiting maximum diameter for efficient insecticide
spray droplets for diverse types of insects is less than 50p.   .  There
is no evidence that 100jo.   droplets have any substantial effect because
the majority are unlikely to reach the target.
       Droplets  smaller than  100 |j, mass median diamter (MMD) of all
herbicidal formations  tested were markedly more inhibitory to all weeds
                                          34
than were droplets larger  than 300  MMD.    The greater effectivness
of small droplets  may be  ascribed to more  efficient absorption and
translocation of herbicide. Large droplets  of high concentration  probably
become physiologically isolated.   Their profound effects on the leaf cells
occur only at the point of direct contact.   A larger number of contact
points are produced on the plants for the same application rate by the
more numerous smaller droplets. This  means that more  susceptible
tissue (e. g; the stem growing point) comes in contact with the herbicide
                                 84

-------
                                  TABLE B-3  Effect of Environment and Application Variables.
                                                                                                 34
00
en
Insect
Spruce budworm
Boll weevil
Bollworm
Cabbage looper
Nominal
gal/acre
1
1
1
1
Nominal
height of
applica-
tion (ft)
300-400
30
30
30
Max
diam
spray
go
350
950
950
950
Max size
droplets
on insects
00
100
63
114
114
Avg no.
droplets/
insect
3b
31
122
96
% of droplets of indicated diamOi)
20-50a
98.0
99.8
99.8
99.4
50-100
2.0
0.2
.2
.6
100
0
0
0
0
            a Under the conditions used, the (Fluorescent Particle)  FP method does  not  identify droplets  smaller than
        the range of 20 p.
              Of a total of 1113 spruce budworm larvae killed by the spray and collected  from random sampling areas,
        23% had no FP's, indicating that they had been killed by a lethal  dose of insecticide delivered by spray drop-
        lets smaller than 20 J* diam.

            Source:  Himel, C. H. and Moore, A. D.

-------
than in the case of the large droplets.
       Components of a fungitoxic material must be closely spaced
over the leaf surface and deposited during weather periods suitable
for spore germination, if infection by causal fungus is to be prevented.
Continuity of the foliage deposition pattern and close spacing of the
particles of the fungicidal ingredients are considered essential to
good disease control.   Toxicity to fungicide increases as particle size of
                                19
the active ingredient decreases.    Exceptions to  this general rule
have been reported.  For example, droplets as large as 400 \i
were claimed to produce essentially as good a disease and insect
control as did others of 100 to 150(0.  MMD when applied  to a number of
           35
row crops.
               d.  Impingement and Uniformity of Coverage
       The first problem in applying pesticide sprays is that of
distributing a small quantity of active material over a large target
area.  The uniformity and extent of the distribution required depends
on the type of pest to be controlled and the mode of action of the
toxicant.  A patchy distribution may be satisfactory for  control of
mobile insects or to apply systemic pesticides to foliage.  For static
pests and contact pesticides,  a more uniform spray deposit is required.
The degree of distribution attained depends on:
       •   The effective area of the target surface,
       •   The shape of the target,
       •   The method of spray application,
       •   The volume of spray applied to the target surface,
       •   The droplet size distribution of the spray,
                                  86

-------
       •    The extent to which the spray is capable of spreading
            over the target surface, and
       •    The extent to which the deposit is subsequently
            redistributed by rain or dew
       The first two factors are invariable, while the next three can
be varied by the spray operator.   The formulator can manipulate the
last three on this list.  The size of the droplet can be controlled to
some extent by both the applicator and the formulator.  In the latter
instance this is determined by modification of the physical properties
of the formulation.    For improved distribution,  understanding of
the effect of operating parameters on the droplet size is essential.
It is unlikely that such comprehension exists with most applicators.
       Pesticide impingement and uniform coverage are closely
related to droplet size and to drift.  Small droplets of lOOp.   diameter
or less tend to become airborne.   They have a higher probability of
impinging on the target during low to mild  conditions.  For example,
with a droplet of 70 p.   and a wind  of three  miles per hour, the
probablity is 10 times greater of its landing on a vertical surface
than on a horizontal surface.    Since most crops grow vertically,
this drift phenomenon is utilized to achieve better impingement or
coverage.  However, as wind velocity increases (approximately,
above 5 miles per hour)  the probability of the droplet striking non-
target areas is increased.  In addition, the very small droplets  are
subject to undersirable upward movement via convective currents
(Table B-4).  Under certain meteorological conditions,  the ideal
droplet size for effective insect control may need to be adjusted if
the pesticide is to be delivered into the microenvironment of the pest.
There is another control on the application system.  This is a lower
                                87

-------
TABLE B-4  Drift Pattern in Relation to Particle Size.
Drop
Diameter (u)
400
150
100
50
20
10
2
Particle Type
Coarse aircraft spray
Medium aircraft spray
Fine aircraft spray
Air carrier sprays
Fine sprays and dusts
Usual dusts and aerosols
Aerosols
Distance in ft. Particle
Would be Carried by a 3-
mph Wind While Falling 10ft.
8 1/2
22
48
178
1,109
4,436
110,880
Source:   National Academy of Sciences.

-------
limit to the size of droplets for deposition on vegetation, weeds or
the food of the pests.  If the droplets are too small they do not have
enough momentum to impinge upon the target surface.
       For an aerosol to kill mosquitoes, in forested areas, the
droplets must be smaller than 30|j. in diameter; this prevents
                                  18
excessive filtering by the foliage.    For penetration through thick
jungle, it has been determined that the droplet size should be below
10 ji  .If,  however,  the aerosol is applied  to forest from aircraft
with the aid of downdraft of the wing airfoil,  it will penetrate and
impinge so long as the droplet diameters do  not exceed 50 (j.
When emitted from generators on the ground, droplets of more than
40 \i  diameter  do not remain airborne for a sufficient distance to be
useful.  An increase in wind speed enables the larger droplets to
make better contact with the target.  When penetration into coniferous
forest is required,  the wind speed in the open should not be less than
                     !9
five miles per hours.
       It is apparent that the proportion of the spray occurring as
small droplets  (50 jj. or less) is of paramount importance in pest
control.  Knowledge of the  in-flight behaviour of small droplets and
of the mircrometerological factors affecting them would allow
delivery of small droplets  to  the target and  reduce drift potential
from agricultural spray operations.  The overall plant coverage and
deposition of small dust particles and spray  droplets can be improved.
Two approaches have been  advanced. Surface-active agents are
commonly used and the  charging of aerosol particles has also been
considered for improvement in plant coverage.   Adjuvants  and surface
active agents added to pesticides improve their deposition, activity
and disperal.  This  is particularly useful for  herbicide application.
                               89

-------
               37,38
Examples are:
        9   Wetting agents.  These reduce interfacial tension and
            bring the liquid into intimate contact with an object.
            The addition of wetting agents to a pesticide,  therefore,
            increases its adherence to the pest.
        •   Emulsifiers.  These tend to prevent tiny droplets from
            coalescing.
        •   Penetrating agents.  These may solublize the waxy
            cuticle or membrane of the pest so that penetration
            of pesticides is more readily achieved.
        •   Dispersing agents.  These reduce cohesion  between like
            particles which aids in pesticide dispersal.
        •   Spreaders.  These increase the spread of the droplets  and
            thus form a uniform coverage on the plant surface,  and
        f   Stickers.  These prevent runoff of pesticides.
        A number  of studies concerning the efficiencies of the
charging and deposition process of the electrostatic pesticide application
                                                     11 3Q-42
method have been conducted over the past two decades.    '
These field and laboratory studies reported indicate that  the electrostatic
processes are effective.   The equipment is reliable under all weather conditions
under which pesticide application might be considered,  provided
properly designed equipment is used and satisfactory operational
procedures are followed.  Dielectric nozzles were superior for inductive
         39
spraying.  Inductive spray charging significantly increased the spray
coverage of the bottom side of cotton leaves.    An average increase of
3. 8 times the quantity of pesticide per unit area for the same
application rate was achieved over uncharged sprays.  This difference
was measured on  the leaf bottoms  which is the critical area.  The
bottom  area hosts the majority  of pests.   In another test  electrostatic
charging enhanced deposition 2. 7 times that of uncharged spray. 40
                              90

-------
Direct application of electrostatic charging to agricultural sprays using
high applied voltages  similar to those for charging paint sprays has
not been tried.   This  is because safety, portability, and reasonable size
are difficult to achieve for equipment requiring high voltages,  such as
50-100 KV, under field conditions.
       Electrostatic deposition of dust requires a different nozzle
than those previously described for  spray applications.  The nozzle
found most efficient for electrostatic dusting is of the air curtain type.
       Air curtain nozzles give higher deposits per unit area of a more
uniform distribution than  any of the  commercial nozzles evaluated.
The average deposition efficiency of charged dust is more than double
that of the uncharged  dust.  However, this efficiency varies with the
properties  of material and the operating conditions.  The major  variation
in performance of the electrostatic dusting equipment has been
attributed to variations in the electrical resistivities of the dust
                                                              41
formulation, and to the relative humidity at the time of dusting.
       The efficiency of any pesticide spray and the degree of control
obtained is a function of the ultimate point of deposition of each of
the pesticide spray droplet produced.  Although the initial justification
for electrostatic  charging of pesticides was primarily a matter of
economics, the need to reduce environment pollution has become  an
increasingly important additional consideration.

                          e.  Soil Incorporation
       Soil application of pesticide  is an essential  agricultural
practice.   It is required to control weeds  prior to their emergence,
to reduce injury  to crops  from soil-borne diseases (root rot,  seedling
diseases) and by insects active in the  soil environment  (corn borers,
cut worms.) Improvements in methods  of application have  been made
                                  91

-------
to increase the effectiveness of soil-applied pesticides.  Soil

incorporation is one of the most prominent of these methods.  Injection

(subsurface spraying)  is used to a lesser degree.

      In a study conducted in Georgia, incorporation of pesticides into

the soil surface by rototilling caused a tenfold reduction of Lindane and
                                43
Dieldrin losses in run-off water.    Greater loss occurred from soils

where the Aldrin was left on the soil surface following an emulsion
application.  Increased persistence occurred after  granules  had been
                                                     44
incorporated into the upper 4  to 5 inches of soil layer.     This
suggests that where high levels of pesticides are present on  a soil
surface, the possibility of harmful water pollution from  the area could

be greatly  minimized by incorporating the pesticides into the soil.

      From the standpoint of agronomic practices and environmental

considerations,  the following advantages can be obtained by soil
incorporation methods rather than surface applications of pesticides:
      •   Increased herbicidal effectiveness by dispersal  in the root
          and emerging shoot zone, increasing the  possibility  of
          contact with weeds  and other pests. 5-49

      •   Reduced loss  of herbicide through incorporation to appropriate
          depths and maintainance of a lethal concentration in  the sur-
          face soil for increased residual action.  Incorporation decreases
          runoff and drift and increases residual action for prolonged
          weed control. 47» 5°-5Z

      •   Decreased variability in the results from area to area and
          from season to season have been clearly  demonstrated.
          Results with most surface applied chemicals are highly
          dependent upon soil and climatic conditions.   Several
          investigators have shown that exposure to sunlight or
          ultraviolet light plays a major role in decomposition of
         herbicides on the soil surface, and the chemical volatility
          and high temperature greatly  affects the  break down of
          certain chemicals.   Reduced variability in the performance
          of a herbicide'under varying soil and climatic  conditions,53 and
                                  92

-------
      •   Decreased volatilization,  runoff and drift. 51
      The efficiency of weed control with soil-incroperated herbicides
is affected by many factors.  These include soil conditions (moisture,
temperature, texture  and structure), physiochemical properties of
herbicides and environmental conditions (sunlight, temperature and
rainfall).  Depth of incorporation and the tools utilized have been shown
to affect the herbicidal efficiency. 15>46»54-58
      The development of herbicides requiring soil incorporation
created the need for a device capable of uniform incorporation.  However,
incorporation tools presently available do not provide the desired soil
placement.   Development requires methods of evaluating these devices
with respect to uniform distribution of the chemical in the soil and
depth of mixing.   Several investigations have used a  traceable material
as a substitute for the herbicide.  These included radioisotopes,
                                      59
granules, magnetic particles and dyes.  A fast and efficient method of
evaluating soil incorporators utilizes a fluorescent dye.
      Because of the strong sorption of many pesticide residues to  soil
particles,  pollution by pesticide occurs  through the transport of pest-
icides-laden soil particles to the aquatic environment.  Erosion control
combined with soil incorporation provides a means of drastically
reducing surface runoff and volatilization losses.

                           4.   Conclusions
      Presently, 63 percent of all pesticides are applied by aircraft.
The remainder is applied with ground equipment.   Most pesticides are
applied as sprays,  either to the plant foliage or to the soil surface.
Some pesticides are incorporated in the soil.   Consequently, any
research program  designed to minimize contamination of the ecosystem
                                  93

-------
by pesticides must include improvement in spray application and soil
incorporation equipment.
      Pesticide usage could  be significantly reduced and still provide
an effective pest control program if it is uniformly distributed  and the
major portion reached its target.  The initial problem is to atomize
relatively non-volatile pesticides formulations into uniform-size drop-
lets which are sufficiently numerous that the pest cannot avoid  contacting
a lethal dose.  The second problem involves  deposition of small particles
or droplets on the target.   One of the methods that could  improve
deposition of pesticides is electrostatics.  The third problem involves
incorporation and injection of soil-applied  pesticides.  These processes
involve optimum depth considerations.  All of these problems merit
intensive research and development.
      Spray efficiency is related to  optimum  droplet size,  uniformity
in spray coverage produced, and degree to which drift and runoff is
minimized.  Ninety percent  or more of spray droplets produced by
existing aerial and ground equipment are not of the optimum size.
This portion of the spray constitutes the major source of  pesticidal
pollution.

                        5.   Recommendations
1.   The program of the Agricultural Research Service of  the U. S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) to determine the optimum droplet
size range for major pests  should be expanded.   Research on improved
methods of pesticide  impingement through  the use of electrostatics and
other techniques should also be increased.
2.   Government and industry should jointly engage in the development of
improved pesticide formulations and the design of equipment capable  of
producing the desired droplet size.
                                    94

-------
3.  Government and industry should expand research to improve soil
incorporation and injection equipment.
4.  The Environmental Protection Agency and USDA should jointly
sponsor studies on the comparative efficiency of methods of pesticide
application to minimize contamination of the environment.
5.  The Department of Agriculture, through its Extension Service,
should encourage  growers and custom operators to use the most
advanced  pesticide application equipment under proper meterological
conditions.
                                  95

-------
                            6.  REFERENCES
 1.  Rabb,  R.  L. and Guthrie, F. E. Introduction to the Conference,
    Concepts  Pest Management, Raleigh, North Carolina State
    University Press,  1-3, 1970.

 2.  Himel, C. M. , The Optimum Size for Insecticide Spray Droplets,
    J. Econ.  Entomol. , 62,  919-25, 1969.

 3.  Jenkins, R. ,  Eichers, T. , Andrilenas, P., and Fox, A.,  Pesticide
    Application Equipment Owned by Farmers,  48 States, Agr.  Econ.
    Report No.  161, USDA IRS, 1-15, 1969.

 4.  Koski,  J. T. ,  ULV Brings New Benefits in Air War on Pest,
    Washington, D. C.: USDA Year Book, 121-25,  1968.

 5.  Anonymous, Insecticide Application,  Insect-Pest  Management and
    Control, Washington D. C.tNat.  Acad. Sci. ,  394-424,  1969.

 6.  Smith,  R. ,  Personal  Communication, 1971.

 7.  Brown, A.  W. A. ,  The Application of Insecticides from Aircraft,
    Insect Control by Chemicals, New York:  John Wiley and Sons,  Inc. ,
    414-66, 1951.

 8.  Kirch,  J. H. ,  Waldrum, J. E. , and  Bishop,  P. W. ,  The Microfoil™,
    An Aerial Device for  Controlling Drift from Conventional Sprays,
    Proc.  23rd Ann. Meetings,  Southern Weed Conf. ,  385-88,  1969.

 9.  Brazzel,  J. R. and Watson, W. W. ,  Low Volume  Spray Patterns
    with Three  Types of Aerial Application Equipment,  Agr. Aviation,
    8, 119-21, 1966.

10.  Lofgren,  C. B. , Ultra-Low Volume Applications  of Concentrated
    Insecticides in Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Ann Rev.
    Entomol., 15,  321-42,  1970.

11.  Splinter,  W. E. ,  Air-Curtain Nozzle Developed for Electrostatically
    Charging Dusts, Transactions Am.   Soc.  Agr. Eng. , 11,  487-95  1968

12.  Thornton, R.  and Stamper,  E.  R.  , Airplane Application of Herbicides
    to Row Crops, Proc.  24th Ann Meeting, Southern Weed Conf    371
    75, 1970.
                                     96

-------
13.  Shapley, D. ,  Mirex and the Fire Ant, Decline in Fortunes of Perfect
    Pesticides, Science,172, 358-360, 1971.

14.  Sachnik, N. ,  The Use of Foamicide for  the Application of Herbicides
    by Aerial, Vehicle-Mounted Spray Booms,  Blowers, and Handguns,
    Proc. 22nd Ann. Meetings Southern-Weed Conf. , 392-96, 1969.

15.  Williamson, R. E. , Progress Report,  Soil Incorporation of Pesticides,
    Clemson University,  South Carolina, 1,  28,  1966.

16.  Bals, E. J. ,  Ultra Low Volume and Ultra Low Dosage Spraying,
    Cotton Gr.  Rev., 47,  217-21,  1970.

17.  Smith, H.  R. , Dry Application DCPA and Other Herbicides,  Proc.
    23rd Annual Meetings Southern Weed Conf. , 379, 1970.

18.  Brown,  A.  W. A. ,  Equipment Development for the Application of
    Insecticides,  Insect Control by Chemicals,  New York:  John  Wiley
    and Sons,  Inc., 337-413,  1951.

19.  Hough, W.  S.  and Mason,  A.  F. , Fungicides, Spraying, Dusting and
    Fumigating of Plants, New York:  The MacMillian Co. , 103-31,  1951.

20.  Himel, C. M. and Moore, A.  D. , Spruce Budworm Mortality as a
    Function of Aerial Spray Droplet Size,  Science,  156, 1250-51, 1967.

21.  Hopkins, A. R. and Taft, H.  M. , Deposits of Monocrotophos from
    from Low-Volume and Ultra-Low-Volume Sprays Applied Aerially or
    from Ground Equipment,  J. Econ. Entomol. ,  64, 200-4,  1971.

22.  Brazzel, J.  R. , Watson,  W.  W. , Hursh, J.  S.  and Adair, M.  H. ,
    The Relative  Efficiency of Aerial Application of Ultra-Low-Volume
    and Emulsifiable  Formulations of Insecticides, J. Econ. Entomol. ,
    61, 408-13, 1968.

23.  Messenger,  K. , Low Volume Aerial Spraying Will be Boon to
    Applicators,  Agr. Chemicals, 64-66, 1963.

24.  Gilliland,  F.  R. , Dumas,  W.  T. , Arant, F.  S. and Ivey, H. W. ,
    Cotton Insect Control with ULV Applied Insecticides,  Auburn University
    Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull., 414, 1-23,  1971.

25.  Awad, T.  M. , Vinson, S.  B.  , and Brazzel, J. R., Effect of
    "Environmental and Biological Factors on Persistence of Malathion
    Applied as Ultra-Low Volume or Emulsifiable Concentrates to
    Cotton Plants, Agr. Food Chem. , 15_, 1009-13, 1967.
                                       97

-------
26.  Skoog,  F.  E. ,  Cowan,  F. T. , and Messenger, K. ,  Ultra Low
     Volume Aerial Spraying of Dieldrin and Malathion for Rangeland
     Grasshopper Control, J. Econ. Entomol. , 58, 559-65, 1965.

27.  Adair,  H.  M. , Harris,  F. /.,  Kennedy,  M. V., Laster, M. L.,  and
     Threadgill, E. D. ,  Drift of  Methyl Parathion Aerially Applied Low
     Volume and Ultra Low  Volume, J. Econ.  Entomol., 64, 718-21, 1971.

28.  Knapp, F. W. , Swath Width Studies with Low-Volume Aerial Sprays,
     Proc. North Central Branch - E. S.  A., 2L  71-79,  1966.

29.  Knapp, F. W. and Pass, B.  S. ,  Low Volume Aerial Sprays for
     Mosquito Control, MOSQ. News, 26, 22-25, 1966.

30.  Himel, C. M. ,  The Physics and Biology of the Control of Cotton
     Insect Populations with Insecticide Sprays, J. Georgia Entomol.
     Soc., 4, 33-40,  1969.

 31.  Himel, C. M. ,  New Concept in Application Methodology,  S.  E.
     Forest Insect Workshop, Charleston, South Carolina, 1-9, 1970.

32.  Wiedhass, D. E. , Bowman,  M.  C.,  Mount,  G. A.,  Lofgren, C. S.,
     and Ford,  H. R. , Relationship of Minimum Lethal Dose to the Opti-
     mum Size  of Droplets of Insecticides for Mosquito Control,  MOSQ.
     News,  3£, 195-200,  1970.

33.  Himel, C. M.  and Moore, A. D. , Spray Droplet Size in the Control
     of Spruce Budworm, Boll  Weevil, Bollworm, and Cabbage Looper,
     J.  Econ.  Entomol.,  62, 916-18,  1969.

34.  Ennis,  W. B. and Williamson, R. E. , Influence of Droplet  Size on
     Effectiveness of Low-Volume Herbicidal Sprays,  Weeds,  11,  67-72,
     1963.                                                   ""'

35.  Wilson, J. D. ,  Hedden, O.  K. ,  and Sleesman, J.  P.,  Spray Droplets
     Size  as Related to Disease and Insect Control on Row Crops, Ohio
     Agr. Exp. Sta.  Res. Bull.,  945,  1-50, 1963.

36.  Ford, R. E. and Furmidge,  C. G. L.,  The Formation of Spray Drops
     from Viscous Fluids, Pesticidal Formulations Res.  Am.  Chem  Soc
     86,  155-82, 1969.                                     '        '

37.  Anonymous,  Weed Control,  Washington,  D. C. , Nat. Acad   Sci   2
     233-256, 1968.                                     '      '     "  -'
                                   98

-------
38.   Klingman,  G.  C. , Surface Active Agents:  Weed Control as a Science,
     New York: John Wiley & Sons,  81-91, 1961.

39.   Law, S. E. and Bowen,  H.  D. , Charging Liquid Spray by Electro-
     static Induction, Transactions Am.  Soc.  Agr. Eng.  9, 501-6, 1966.

40.   Splinter, W.  E. , Electrostatic Charging of Agricultural Sprays,
     Transactions Am. Soc. Agr.  Eng. , U_, 491-95, 1968.

41.   Bowen,  H. D. and Webb, B. K. ,  Some Effects of Dust Resistivity on
     the  Electrostatic Pesticide Application Process, Transactions Am.
     Soc. Agr.  Eng., 11, 175-79,  1968.

42.   Webb,  B.  K. and Bowen, H. D. ,  Electrostatic Field Breakdown
     Phenomena in Applying Charged Particles, Transactions Amer.
     Soc. Agr.  Eng.,J3,  455-461, 1968.

43.   White, A.  W. , Barnett, A. P., Dooley,  A. E. , and Turnbull,  J. W. ,
     The Effects of Application Method and Time Interval Between Appli-
     cation and Rainfall on Lindane and Dieldrin, Losses in Runoff from
     Field Plots, Agron. Abst. , Amer.  Soc.  Agron. , 113,  1971.

44.   Lichtenstein,  E. P., Myrdal,  G.  R. , and Schulz,  K.  R. , Effect of
     Formulation and Mode of Application of Aldrin on the Loss of Aldrin
     and Its Epoxide from Soils and Their Translocation  into Carrots,  J.
     Econ. Entomol. , _57, 133-36, 1964.

45.   Holstun, J. T. and Wooten,  O. B. , A Promising New Concept:
     Triband Application of Herbicides,  Agr.  Chemicals, 19, 24-25,
     123-24,  1964.

46.   Ashton, F. M. and Dunster, K. ,  The Herbicidal Effect of EPTC,
     CDEC,  and CDAA on Echinochloa crusgalli with Various Depths of
     of Soil Incorporation,  Weeds,  9,  312-17,  1961.

47.   Wiese, A.  F. , Chenault, E. W. ,  and Hudspetth, E. B. , Incorporation
     of Preplant Herbicides for Cotton, Weed Sci. , _17_,  481-83,  1969.

48.   Linscott,  D.  L. and Hagin, R.  D. ,  Precision Placement of Herbicides
     for Weed Control in Seedling Alfalfa, Weed Sci. , 17_, 46-47,  1969.

49.   Garner, T. H. , Webb,  B. K. , Gossett,  B. J. , and  Rieck, C. E. ,
     A Comprehensive Technique for Evaluating the Performance of
     Soil-Incorporated Herbicides, Am.  Soc.  Agr.  Eng., Pullman,:
     Washington, 1-23,  1971.
                                     99

-------
50.   Barnsley, G. E. and Rosher,  P. H. ,  The Relationship between the
     Herbicidal Effects of 2, 6 - Dichlorobenzonitrile and its Persistence
     in the Soil,  Weed Res., 1,  147-58,  1961.

51.   Gray, R. A. , A Vapor Trapping Apparatus for  Determining the Loss
     of EPTC and Other Herbicides from Soils,  Weeds,  13, 138-41,  1965.

52.   Fink, R. J., Effects of Soil Incorporation Depths on the Trifluralin
     Carryover Injury,  Abst. , Amer. Soc.  Agron, 32, 1971

53.   Standifer, L. C. ,  and  Thomas,  C. H. , Response of Johnsongrass  to
     Soil-Incorporated  Trifluralin, Weeds, 13,  302-6, 1965.

54.   Barrentine,  W.  L. , Wooten, O. B.,  and Hoi stun, Jr.  J.  T. ,  A
     Progress Report on the Evaluation of Soil Incorporators - Dye
     Techniques, Miss. Agr.  Exp. Sta. Bull. ,  702,  1-6,  1965.

55.   Hauser,  E.  W.  , Preemergence Activity of Three Thiocarbamate
     Herbicides  in Relation to Depth  of Placement in the  Soil, Weeds,
     13, 255-7, 1965.

56.   Nishimoto,  R.  K. , Appleby,  A. P., Furtick, W. R. , Plant Response
     to Herbicide Placement in Soil,  Weed  Sci. , _17,  475-8,  1969.

57.   Anderson, W.  P., Richards,  A. B. , and Whitworth, J. W.,
     Trifluralin Effects on Cotton Seedling, Weeds, 13,  224-7, 1967.

58.   Williamson, R.  E. and Garner, T. H. ,  Development of Functional
     Requirements for Soil  Incorporation Equipment,  Meeting Weed Sci.
     Soc.  Amer.  , St. Louis, Missouri, 6,  1-7,  1966.

59.   Williford, J. R. ,  Wooten, O.  B. ,  and Barrentine, W.  L. ,
     Fluorometric Analysis for Evaluation  of Soil Incorporation,  Weed
     Sci. ,  16, 372-73,  1968.
                                 100

-------
    C.  THE ROUTE  OF PESTICIDES INTO AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

                             1.  Introduction

       Pesticides may enter surface waters as a result  of agricultural,
commercial, and domestic applications.  They are used for  diverse
purposes  such  as control of pests  in agricultural products, stored food
and fabrics,  structural material, parks, golf courses,  home  lawns  and
gardens,  etc.  Other  sources of pesticidal entry into the aquatic
environment are industrial waste discharges;  pesticidal applications
directly onto water surfaces;  drift from aerial applications;  overland
drainage;intentional dumping; cleaning of contaminated materials  and
equipment; incinerator and  open burning gaseous and particulate
discharges; wind-blown, treated materials; and accidental spills.
       Agriculture is the chief consumer of pesticides in the Southeast.
Their fate after application  is complex.  It may involve biological and
photo-degradation, chemical oxidation and hydrolysis, direct volatilization,
and migration into adjacent areas,  translocation into plants,  and sorption
onto airborne  particulates and soil materials.  It is difficult to accurately
determine the quantity of pesticides transported into the aquatic
environment from time and  place of such applications.  A more thorough
understanding of the physicochemical nature of the pesticide, as  well
as the associated ecological system,  will be necessary to comprehend
their  roxite into the aquatic environment.
       Soil is an important  terrestrial sink for pesticides.   It  controls
the movement of the chemical through leaching and/or vaporization.
Transport into and within the water media is likely to involve parti-
culate matter and sediments via processes as  yet not been well defined.
                               101

-------
Information is not available to describe the role of natural hydrologic
dynamics in controlling the movement of pesticides through the aquatic
environment.   There is well-documented evidence that certain chlorinated
organic pesticides are rather widely distributed and persistent in the
environment and are accumulated in the aquatic food chain.   Intensive
systemic research is required to provide a more complete understanding
of the interaction between pesticides and the water environment.
                     2.  Properties of Pesticides

        The nature of pesticides is one of the most important factors that
governs their movement into water courses.  Like other 'chemicals,  they
obey physical and chemical laws.  By defining their behavior and
properties, a better understanding of their  effects  in the environment
will be realized.  The  relevant physicochemical properties of pesticides
include the dissociation constant, molecular structure,  size and
configuration of molecules, water solubility,  and dipole moment.  These
and other properties appear to influence the movement and retention of
pesticides in,  through,  and from soil surfaces.  The dissociation  constant
indicates the degree of acidity or basicity.  This is an important factor
in the sorption and desorption  of the pesticide in soils.  The electronic
distribution within the  molecule establishes its properties and will be
affected by the nature  of aliphatic and aromatic substitutions onto the
parent molecule.  In turn,  these affect the ease of hydrogen bonding
Van der Waals forces increase with increasing molecular size  and
especially with increase of the number  of double and triple bonds.   The
nature of functional groups further influences inter-and intra-molecular hvdroeen
bonding and affects the affinity of the molecule for  the sorbing  surfaces
Sorption may be precluded through steric hindrance as a result of
molecular configuration.  Water solubility will influence the partition
                                102

-------
of the pesticide  among the liquid, solid, and vapor phases.  This affects
transport of the compound from the area of initial application.  The
degree of polarity of the pesticide affects its solubility in water and its
affinity for  sorbing surfaces.  Thus,  the dipole moment may correlate
with the  retention and movement of pesticides in soils and in aquatic
environment.   Molecular chemical properties are closely related to the
functional groups and strucuture of the pesticide molecule. It is known that
the sulfur atom in the alkyl chain of an organic  compound can be easily
oxidized in  the atmosphere to sulfoxide or sulfone.  Thimet and Temik,
organic phosphorus and organic  carbamate pesticides,  respectively, are
examples.  They become more toxic when they  are oxidized.   Purely
chemical reactions taking place between pesticides and soils  have been
         2
reported .  A detailed analysis  of the  chemical properties  of pesticides
is beyond the  scope of this report.
       Organic phosphorus pesticides hydrolyze with comparative
rapidity. Although Parathion is long-lived (50 percent hydrolyzed in
water in 120 days),  most of this class are hydrolyzed over intervals of
hours to a few days  .  An unusual case of persistence of Parathion has
              4
been reported .  About 0. 1 percent of the total  Parathion applied to soil
remained 16 years after  application.    Parathion may have dissolved into
lipids of the soil organic matter and thus have been protected from
bacterial degradation and hydrolysis.  Degradation of Parathion occurs
either via hydrolysis or by reduction to its  amino form.  The latter
alternative  depends upon the population of soil microorganisms.  In
soils of low moisture content and low microorganism activity,  Parathion
                            5
persists over longer periods .  Carbamate compounds are less persistent
and disappear in rivers within 8 weeks of application .
                                103

-------
        Chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides exhibit a very high photo-

 and biological-resistance.  Technical Aldrin, Chlordane, Endrin,

 Heptachlor, Dilan, Isodrin, BHC, andToxaphene remained in Congaree

 sandy loam soil up to 14 years and were measured at 40, 40, 41,  16,

 23,  15,  10, and 45 percent of initial application, respectively,7 Thirty-

 nine percent of the DDT remained in three types of soil up to 17 years.

 No measurable degradation nor chemical change was observed for BHC,

 DDE,  DDT,  ODD, Dieldrin,  Endrin, and Heptachlor epoxide after 8 weeks

 in river water .   The high stability and long persistence of certain
                                                   8-12
 organochlorine pesticides in  soil have been reported      . Persistence

 of these compounds is influenced by soil type, moisture, 'temperature,

 and mode of application.  DDT, Aldrin,  and Lindane persist longer in

 muck  soil than in Miami silt  loam  .  The persistence  of Aldrin is

 affected by  soil moisture.  Water, apparently, causes a displacement of

 the Aldrin from the soil particles and enhances evaporization of the
          9
 compound .  Aldrin and Heptachlor persist longer in soils of low tempera-

 ture than in soils  of high temperature  .  Incorporation of Aldrin and

Heptachlor into the soil increased the persistence  of these compounds by

a factor of ten  .

        Interaction between herbicides and soil microorganisms has
            13, 14
 been studied   '   .  It was demonstrated that various phenoxyacetic

 acid herbicides are more inhibitory to microorganisms under acid

 conditions than under neutral or alkaline conditions and  they disappear

 more rapidly from soils under conditions favorable for microbial
            14
 development   .  Photo-and biological-stability are inherent  properties

 of individual pesticides and important in determining their persistence

 in the  environment.  Organic herbicides  in water may be completely

 destroyed by exposure to intensive high energy radiation^.
                               104

-------
Picloram could not be detected in a solution which originally contained


an initial concentration of 1 milligram per liter (mg/1) after 30 minutes


or less exposure to high intensity ultraviolet irradiation.  Enzymatic


conversion of chloromaleylacetic acid to succinic acid has also been


reported  .  In order to understand the route of pesticides and their by-


products into the aquatic system, these and other processes  must be


considered.  For example, photo-and biological-detoxification of


pesticides determine  over what distance and time they effect the


aquatic environment.  There is also an urgent need to develop effective


pesticidal decontamination methods suitable for use in various aquatic


environments. Activated carbon treatment of  potable supplies is the

                        3
only established process .  No comparable treatment of natural systems


exist.


                 3.  Sorption-Desorption Phenomena



        The principal source of water pollution by pesticides  today is


runoff from the land.  To ascertain directly the transport mechanism of


pesticides by overland flow,  it is necessary to understand fully the


sorption and desorption of chemicals  on soil and aquatic sediments.


Clay minerals are  the major components of Southeastern soils and


complexation onto their surfaces  is an important factor.  Sorption


and desorption of organic pesticides by soils are closely  related to


soil type and constituents,  moisture,  temperature,  cation exchange


capacity and surface area, and the physiochemical properties of the


pesticide itself.  Organic components of the soil appear to possess

                                                                  1  17  18
the greatest sorption potential for cationic and molecular pesticides


The clays, especially montmorillonite and vermiculite,  play an


important role in sorption because of their high cation exchange capacity


and relatively large surface area.  The oxide and hydroxide  components
                                105

-------
of the  soil may also contribute to the total sorption capacity through
high anion exchange capacity and large surface area.
        The forces involved in sorption may be coulombic (chemical
sorption),  Van der Waals (physical sorption), or hydrogen bonding.
Isotherms have been measured for a series of herbicides sorbed onto
                                                                     .   17
clays and found to be highly  dependent on  pH and  electrolyte concentration
The organic content is usually very low in many of the coarse-textured
soils of the Southern United  States. In this situation the clay fraction
assumes a greater importance as sorption sites for pesticides.

        Biodegradation markedly affects the stability of dilute organic
clay complexes in solution.  If this is not  recognized then misleading
                                            19
information can result from sorption studies  .  Clay particulates are
usually negatively charged in aqueous solutions.  Sorption is attributed
to the  charge attractive forces between the negatively charged clay
surface and the positively charged organic ions   .  Unionized organic
molecules and organic anions are either not  sorbed or are very weakly
sorbed because of competitive sorption of the more polar water molecule
and the repulsive  force between the organic anions and clay surface
Sorption by organically treated clay indicates that the solubility of the
                                                    21
organic sorbate mainly governs the extent of sorption   .   This organo-
clay is often hydrophobic in nature.
        Pyridine sorption onto kaolinite and montmorillonite is described
by the  empirical Freundlich relationship (amount sorbed per unit weight
is an exponential function of  the equilibrium concentration of the  sorbate)22
Significant sorption occurs in less than 17 minutes and is attributed to a
cationic exchange  process.   The amount sorbed depends on the aqueous
solution pH and temperature.  Maximum sorption occurs at pH 4  0 a d
                               106

-------
5. 5 for sodium montmorillonite and sodium kaolinite,  respectively.  In
the case of desorption, pyridine desorption is directly related to the
number of stages and/or the volume of solution, with maximum
desorption occurring at pH  1 and 11.   Desorption is much slower than
                                                    23
sorption at a comparable pH and clay to organic ratio  .  These
carefully-controlled studies must be repeated with many of the pesticides
if the processes  affecting persistence  are to be understood.   Many of
the published results are suspect because adequate experimental
controls were not maintained.
        Huang, et.  al. reported that the  sorption of DDT, Heptachlor,
andDieldrin by kaolinite,  illite, and montmorillonite is very rapid
                                      24  25
and exhibits Freundlich type isotherms   '  .  These investigators
concluded that the primary  mechanism of the  sorption of these pesticides
by  clays is  through the formation of hydrogen bonding and other strong
forces of interaction.   Only Van der Waals forces contribute significantly
to the  sorption of Dieldrin.  These findings may be in error.  Because
of the  nonpolar  nature of the chlorinated hydrocarbon, it is very
unlikely that they are  retained by the pure clay  particle via any of the
aforementioned sorption forces.  In fact, these pesticides tend to
associate with or accumulate  in the organic fraction  of the crude clay.
The clays used in many studies are not properly characterized or
prepared to assure that they are not organo-clays at  the outset.   In
nature, they may be converted to organo-clays but the nature of these
converted materials is not known.
        It has been reported that the sorption and desorption of Dieldrin
by  montmorillonite sediment are not significantly affected by either
                                                                    26
temperature (10°C to 30°C)  or salt concentration (0. 03 to 3. 0 percent)  .
The investigator also  stated that soluble organic matter, such as glucose,
                                107

-------
alanine,  and stearic acid,  did not exert an effect on the rates and
equilibria of the sorption of Dieldrin, DDT, and Heptachlor by
montmorillonite and illite.  These investigations are not scientifically
acceptable as reported.  There is no specific description of  the
physicochemical characterization of the clay or  the experimental
          27 28
techniques   '  .  The nature of saturating cation,  source and purity
of the clay minerals employed,  clay particle size and surface area,
and the pH of the aqueous system are important  factors which will
affect the sorption properties of the clay.   These must be reported if
the results are to be meaningful.
       The sorption of dithio-carbamates (fungicides) by clays is
reported to be the result of coulombic forces because of the  ionic
nature of the compound in  solution  .   The ethylene dibromide (  a
fumigant) and organic  phosphorus insecticides may be retained at the
clay surface through external hydrogen bonding.   This is because of
the noncharge nature and unequal distribution of charge of the
respective molecules
       The sorption  of  2,  4-D  by Bentone24(an organo-bentonite) is
rapid and considerable but sorption of the chemical by untreated bentonite
                          29
was below detectable limits   .   Greater  sorption was found in more
concentrated sorbate solutions or under more  acidic conditions.  Sorption
is directly proportional  to  the organic fraction of the clay.  Thus,
reports that  clays sorb negatively charged molecules (such as  2, 4-D)
may be attributed to a mechanism not readily appreciated by those
making the studies.  The clays  complex organic molecules,  such as
amines,  cationic detergent, etc. , from aqueous solution and the
resulting organic clay surface then sorbs  the 2,  4-D.  The physical
and chemical nature of the organo-clay surface determines the extent
of subsequent sorption of other  organics such as pesticides.
                             108

-------
       It has been reported that clay minerals (illite, kaolinite, and
montmorillonite) sorb very little 2,  4-D or Isopropyl  N- (-3 Chlorophenyl)
carbamate (CIPC)   '   .  Hamaker,  et.  al. found that organic matter
and hydrated metal oxides are principally  responsible for the sorption
of 4-Amino-3,  5,  6-trichloropicolinic acid on soil .   The poor sorption
of this compound's anionic  species by clay minerals and the strong
sorption by hydrated metal oxides would appear to be  consistent with
a process of replacing the hydroxyl  ions from the metal oxide surface.
The greatest sorption of the acids, 2, 4-D, and 2, 4,  5-T was observed
onto soils containing a high percentage of organic matter and for red
and acidic soils
       Freundlich type isotherms were measured for sorption of a number
                                  32
of herbicides onto montmorillonite   .  Regardless of the chemical
character of the sorbent, sorption occurs  to the greatest extent  on
highly acidic H-montmorillonite (a homoionic clay) as compared to the near
neutral Na-montmorillonite.  The degree of sorption of organic  compounds
with widely differing chemical characteristics is governed by the degree
of water solubility,  the dissociation constant of the sorbate and the pH
of the clay system.   The  surface acidity affects the sorption of basic
organic compounds by  the clay.
       The organic  content of the soil is the major factor influencing
retention  of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides in soil.   For example,
                                                           33
dieldrin retention is  related to  the organic content of the soil  and the
immobilized residues of herbicides-derived chloroanilines are chemically
                                     34
bonded to humic substances of the soil   .  However, as stated earlier,
the organic content of many of the coarse textured soils in the Southern
United States is very low.  In. these  states, the clay fraction of the  soil
is likely to be the principal factor involved in sorption of pesticide.
                               109

-------
       Within the aquatic environment,  it has been established that bot-
tom sediments exhibit higher pesticide concentrations than surface wa-
ter35' 36.  For example,  0. 02 to 3. 58 parts per million (ppm) of DDT and
its metabolites and 0 to 2. 47 ppm of Toxaphene were found in the bottom
                                              35
sediment of selected Delta Lakes in Mississippi   .  Lake waters are
generally low in pesticide residues.  It has been found that the  sorption
of both Endrin and Dieldrinby bottom sediment is time-dependent and
pH sensitive   .  The sorption of Dieldrin occurs only at a low pH.
If the pH  is adjusted above 7, Endrin will not remain associated with
the bottom sediments for an extended period  of time.  Similarly at pH
greater than 8, the  sorption of Dieldrin is  negligible.  The sorption of
Endrin is salinity-dependent, but not so, in the case of Dieldrin.  Because
the pesticidal concentration  is maintained by a dynamic equilibrium,
the desorption of pesticides  from bottom sediment may occur as a
function of changes in physical, chemical and biological stresses.
This, provides a potentially continuous  supply of these chemicals to
the aqueous solution.  This tends to extend the potential contact time  of
the pesticides to  aquatic organisms and affects the aquatic food chain.
       The aquatic organism can magnify many-fold the pesticide doses
originally introduced into the ecosystem.   The dose  is passed along and
concentrated in the aquatic food chain.  Eventually it may reach man
or recycle in the aquatic  environment.  It has been determined that flora
and fauna contain DDT and its metabolites  nearly 1, 000 times as great
                                        37
as the concentration present in the water  .  Residues of DDT and 'ts
metabolites, and Toxaphene in the flesh  of fish from selected Missis
                                                                   sippi
Delta Lakes have been found to be 0. 15 to 10.60 ppm and 0 to 20 ppm
                                                                  in
respectively  .   The median concentrations of Endrin and Dieldrin
oyster samples were determined to be less than 10 ppm in the lower
Mississippi River   .  It was found that DDT accumulated in lake  trout38
                              no

-------
                            39
and in marine phytoplankton  .  Toxaphene concentrates in aquatic
              40
plants and fish  .  The biological magnification capability of aquatic
life significantly increases the hazardous and destructive potential of
pesticides originally present in the water.  It also serves to localize these
materials  and modify their transport within the aqueous system.
        Pesticidal contamination  is found on plants and agricultural
products grown on pesticide-treated soils.  These pesticides are
apparently first sorbed by the root system and then translocated into
the plant.  Aldrin andHeptachlor  residues have been found in cucumbers
                                         41
and alfalfa grown on pesticide-treated soils .   Similarly, residues of
                                           42           43  44
Endrin or DDT have been detected in  turnips   , soybeans  '   ,  and
                          44  45
peanuts and tobacco leaves   '    grown in soil treated with these
pesticides. Cotton plant leaves accumulate different amounts of
Dimethoate under different light and humidity  conditions.  Both high
humidity and darkness greatly  reduce Dimethoate accumulation in  the
       46
leaves  .  Five kinds of  carrots  were found contaminated with various
amounts of Aldrin  or Heptachlor.  This was a result of considerable
difference in rates of sorption^?.  DDT, BHC, and Parathion are
translocated to  root crops and  cause  decreased yields^S,
        It can be concluded that sorption and desorption processes  are
the major  factors influencing pesticide movement into aquatic environ-
ment after application.   Sorption is affected by soil type, clay and
organic content of  the soil,  soil temperature, physicachemical nature
of the pesticide, the degree of  the saturating cations on the colloid
exchange  site,  and pH of the ecosystem.   Bottom sediments, aquatic
organisms and plants grown in pesticide-contaminated areas  accu-
mulate large amounts of pesticides.  Sorption capacity and desorp-
tion processes for  various types of soil need investigation under varying
                              in

-------
field conditions, such as rainfall intensity, pH, temperature,  etc.  Less
persistent pesticides may be necessary at certain times.   Appropriate
concentration and application techniques must be  evolved.

                       4.  Movement into Water

        Water solubility, although important in the physical transport
of the pesticide from the area of application,  is not considered to be
the major  factor in leachability.  A very water-soluble compound will
not leach if it is irreversibly sorbed  and an insoluble compound will
                               49
leach readily if it is not sorbed  .  The moisture content of the soil
as well as the intensity and frequency of rainfall affect the overall
movement of pesticides in the soil.  A low moisture content favors
retention of  the pesticide in soil because it lowers total solubility and
enhances the competition of the pesticide for  an adsorption site.   Bailey
reported that a  lower  rainfall intensity  resulted in greater removal
of a herbicide from the upper surface horizons  than did less frequent
rainfall  .   Certain pesticides  are leached in greater amounts and to
greater depths under lower rainfall intensities.  Weather patterns may
be as important as total rainfall in determining the movement  of herbicides
in soil* 7.
        With readily available soil moisture,  phytoactivity may be
enhanced.    This action likely  results from increased susceptibility
of a plant to the herbicide, increased transpiration,  and/or increased
                           49
availability of the herbicide  .   Laboratory data showed that penetration
of Dieldrin into  the soil is dependent  on both soil type and moisture level
at the time of application.  Thus,  distribution in the soil may vary from
a thin layer of concentrated insecticide to  a relatively thick layer of
less concentrated insecticide.  Field penetration  of Dieldrin was found
lowest in arid soils and highest in wet soils
                                 112

-------
       The movement of water into the soil from the surface is known
as infiltration while the movement of water through the soil is known
as percolation.  The infiltration of water into the soil depends on the
soil's initial moisture content  .   The forces of gravity, capillarity
and hydrodynamic factors cause the movement of water soluble pesticides
                                                                        1 18
down through the soil.   Soil texture will affect the movement of pesticides '
Pesticides leaching is greater in soils of light texture.
       The three major means of pesticide transport within soil are:
       •    Diffusion in the voids of the  soil
       •    Diffusion in the soil water
       •    Downward flowing water
       The first and third are important in the  movement of volatile and
nonvolatile pesticides,  respectively.  Pore size and pore size distribu-
tion affect the rate of water passing through the soil as well as the
extent of downward spreading motion of  the pesticide.
       If no appreciable attenuation occurred, a pesticide could pass
                                                         52
through the following parts of the environment in sequence
       •    Soil Surface
       •    Zone of aeration or the zone between the soil
            surface and the water table
       •    Zone of saturation or the zone of groundwater
       •    Stream course
       •    The sea.
       In some cases,  pesticides extend through the zone of aeration
into the zone of saturation where they tend to spread laterally.
       The depth of the zone of aeration varies from near zero in
swampland to several hundred feet in arid regions.   The zone of
                                 113

-------
saturation may extend to a considerable depth, but as the depth increases,
the accompanying weight of the overlying soil arid material tends to close
pore spaces and,  thus, relatively little potable water is found at depths
of more than 2, 000 feet. 53 In the zone of aeration the moisture may be
present as gravity water in transit to large pore  spaces, as capillary
water in small pores,  as hydroscopic moisture adhering to a  thin film
on the grains of soil, and as water vapor.
       The movement of water vapor in the soil is related to tempera-
ture, i. e. , vapor movement is  from high to low temperatures. However,
for the most part temperature gradients are usually small and the  quan-
tity of moisture moved is negligible.
       Groundwater, in its natural state, is constantly moving  and this
movement is controlled by established hydraulic  principles.  Darcy's
law is used to express the movement through aquifers,  most  of which
are natural porous media.  The measure of the ease of flow through the
porous media is  known as  permeability.

       Sorption and retention  of cations on the surfaces of aquifers are
dependent upon the fine silt, clay, and organic fractions of the aquifer.
The principal cations  involved are sodium, calcium,  and magnesium.
The soluble products of soil weathering and erosion add salts to the
groundwater  during its passage through soils.  Irrigation water, perco-
lating to the water table, contributes large quantities of salt.   This is
primarily the result of the drainage water salts being concentrated by
the evapotranspiration process.

       Generally, the chlorinated hydrocarbons,  such as DDT, persist
in the soils and do not move in appreciable concentrations  through  the
soils and into the drainage effluent as groundwater. 55  Pesticide resi-
dues do not penetrate deeply enough  into the soil  to obviate a  biological
hazard.  Downward movement is aided by cultivation.   The preponderance
                                  114

-------
of residue accumulations appears to be confined chiefly to the top one



foot of soil, and within this  depth most residues are found within the



cultivation layer (4 to 6 inches).  In the fire ant control program, most



Heptachlor residues have been found within the top inch of soil.   Humus



layers fall within the zone in which most residues occur.




       The movement and distribution of DDT in a heavy  clay soil has



been studied by several investigators.  For  example, Swoboda,  et.  al.



found that most of the DDT remained in the top 12 inches of soil but  that



some DDT was found at the  lower profiles probably as the result of



leaching.  '  Breidenbach,  et.  al. reported that percolate water, inter-



cepted below the rooting depth at 2. 44 meters (8 feet) contained no



Methoxychlor and only trace amounts of 2,  4,  5-T fourteen months after



application.  The total amount of 2,  4,  5-T found in the percolate was so



small that it did not indicate significant contribution to groundwater  con-

            C o
tamination.  °  A major portion of the  applied pesticide was removed from

                              C Q

the soil by overland drainage.




       The movement of micron-size  particles through a  sand bed has



been investigated using  radiochemical tracers.    The transport rate



of the finer particles was essentially the  same as that of the cations in



solution,while  the rate of the coarser particles appeared to be signifi-



cantly  slower.  Sodium humate, a common soil constituent, can solu-



bilize insoluble pesticides   such  as DDT  in water, thereby, facilitating



the transport of the pesticide.  Swoboda,  et.  al. suggest that the move-



ment of  pesticides in soil in the Southern states is primarily caused by



leaching, movement with soil particles, and volatilization (because  of


                        57
high soil  temperatures).




       A mathematical  model has been developed to describe the move-



ment of DDT and its decomposition product, DDE, in an ecosystem.



Some predictions of the  consequence of adding DDT to the  environment



are possible and are based on its transport,  accumulation,  and concen-



tration, within ecosystems. "0
                                   115

-------
       It can be concluded that a major portion of the applied pesticide
is removed from the  soil by overland drainage." Movement of pesticide
through the soil by infiltration and percolation is  small and it contributes
in only a minor way to groundwater contamination.
                        a.   Direct Application
       Many organic pesticides are added directly to water to control
aquatic insects, trash fish, and aquatic plants.  Examples include:
Dieldrin for control of sand fly larvae; Toxaphene and Rotenone for con-
trol of various species  of fish; and phenoxy acetic and propionic acid for
aquatic plant control.    In these cases, direct water contamination re-
sults.
       It has been found that Fintsol can be used  more effectively  than
Rotenone under a  wider variety of  conditions  for controlling sunfish in
catfish pounds.  ^  Aquatic weeds  (Parrots Feather, Needlerush, Pitho-
phora  sp^ ,  Potamogeton sp. ,  and Microcystis sp. ) have been controlled
by the application of herbicides (2, 4-D, Aquion,  Karmex, copper  sul-
                                                  / -3
fate and Kuron) in conjunction with fish production.     High rates of  2,
4-D application for water milfoil control in Tennessee Valley Authority
reserve
quality.
reservoirs have not produced adverse effects on aquatic fauna or water
        64
       In a sand fly eradication program, it was  reported that during
1955, 2, 000 acres of salt marsh in St.  Lucie  County,  Florida, were
                                 o / r
treated with 1 Ib/acre of Dieldrin.  '     Twenty to thirty tons  of fish,  an
estimated 1,117, 000,  representing some 30 species,  were killed and re-
production was not observed for four weeks.  Crustaceans were virtually
eliminated; however, fiddler crabs survived in areas missed by the spray
treatment.

       The presence of tree roots  in sewer lines creates a major pro-
blem in urban areas.  Control has  been achieved by the flooding technique
for addition of herbicides such as Metham and Dichlobenil. 66  However,
                                  116

-------
this practice does not take into account that these herbicides will be intro-
duced into the sewage system and may then present a major contamination
problem.
       To eliminate harmful side effects on non-target species,direct
application of pesticide to waters should be minimized and alternative
controls devised wherever possible.
                         b.  Overland Drainage
       Not all of the pesticides applied to land end up in a waterway,
but it is likely that almost all pesticides in streams result from storm
runoff or  overland flow.  '   '   '   '     The pesticides are initially sorbed
onto particulate matter and then transported as complexes to the water
course. 1  Chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides  have been found in bottom
sediments in 126 locations of the Mississippi River. These deposits are
attributed to agricultural sources. °^» ^ Since chlorinated hydrocarbon
pesticides are only slightly soluble  in water, they may  be transported as
a film,  emulsion, or in association with particulate matter.  Chlorinated
hydrocarbons are found in surface waters of the Southeast. ^1» 72 -phe
number of occurrences reached a peak in 1966.  Their presence has de-
clined sharply since 1967.  This trend is consistent with the decrease  of
production and usage of chlorinated hydrocarbons and the increase in the
use of organophosphorus and carbamate compounds.
       Instances of surface  water contamination with chlorinated hydro-
                                                          73
carbon pesticides have occurred in certain areas of Georgia  ,  in major
river basins of the United States, in the Mississippi River and Delta
     777^76                                          77
area   '   '   , in sugar cane farming areas of Louisiana   , and in farm
ponds. 7^' 7^  Surface  runoff from fields was the main source of these
pesticidal contaminations.  For example,  Toxaphene and BHC were de-
tected in all samples taken from a stream in northern Alabama from the
summer of 1959 through the  winter of 1963.  Analyses of treated and un-
treated drinking water showed that purification processes failed to com-
                                     80
pletely remove these two compounds.

                                    117

-------
                          (1).  Soil Erosion

       The transport of pesticides into the aquatic environment and
                                              O1
their persistence presents a complex problem.    It has been established

that there is a relatively long persistence of certain chemicals which
have been in use since 1945.   Eroded soils previously treated or incorpo-

rated with pesticides are major sources of surface water contamination.

It has been estimated that the gross sediment eroded each year in the

United States is around 4 billion tons.  This loss occurs by the processes
                                                        o o
of sheet  erosion, gullying, and a stream channel erosion. 0£> Entrain-
ment,  transportation,  and deposition of sediments depend on the proper-

ties of the sediment and the hydraulic characteristics of the waterway.
                                                         83
The seven principal sources of streamborne sediment are:

       •   Sheet erosion, the removal of surface soils by
           overland flow without the formation of channels
           of sufficient depth to prevent cultivation or
           crossing farm machinery;
       •   Gullying, or the cutting of channels in soil caused by
           concentrated runoff;
       •   Erosion of stream banks and channels;

       •   Mass soil movements,  such as landslides;
       •   Flood erosion; and

       •   Erosion associated with development,  such as roadway
           construction.
                                                      8Z
The modes  of sediment transport  may be classified as:

       •  Bed load, rolling or sliding of sediment along the
           stream bed;

       •   Suspended load, suspension of sediment in the moving
           water; and

       •   Wash load,  fine particles carried into and through the
           channel with no relation to the stream bed material.

       An  investigation  of Atrazine associated with runoff and erosion

was made using simulated rainfall and surface applications to soil.   It
                                118

-------
was found that greater losses  resulted when the rain was applied imme-
diately after the herbicide application.  The Atrazine content was highest
during the early stages of runoff as might be expected.  Concentrations
in the  soil fraction of the washoff (water-soil mixture) were higher then
in the  water fraction. 84  Simulated rainfall intensities and storm dura-
tion were used to  investigate 2,  4-D contained in washoff from cultivated
fallow Cecil sandy loam soil. 85 Concentrations of 2, 4-D in the washoff
were  positively correlated with  the application rate and  were greatest
at the  beginning of each storm.  The iso-octyl and butyl ether ester for-
mulations of 2, 4-D were far  more susceptible to removal in washoff
                    o c
than the amine salt. OD For Dieldrin-incorporated soils, losses were
appreciable when erosion occurred and reached 2. 2 percent of the amount
applied. 86
        Effects of soil cultivation on the persistence and vertical distribu-
tion of pesticides  were investigated over  a ten-year period.  After treat-
ment,  DDT and Aldrin were ro to tilled into the soil.  First one-half of
each plot was disked to a depth of approximately 5 inches for 5  consecu-
tive days each week for a 3-month period.  The other half served as a
nondisked control.  While only 26 percent of the applied DDT was lost in
a 4-month period from the nondisked portion,  44 percent was lost from
the disked portion.  For  Aldrin,  53 percent was lost in the nondisked and
70 percent in the  disked plot.  No difference in the distribution  of the resi-
due in the soil layers was found between disked and nondisked soils.
        Chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides applied to the soil to con-
trol subterranean termites have moved through the soil  very slightly
after  10  to 20 years of weathering in open fields in southern Mississippi.
There was  only about 1 foot of vertical movement and only about 20 inches
                                                                  87
of horizontal movement of DDT  under the soil  surface in 2 decades. °'
       Aldrin and Heptachlor  were applied either to the soil surface or
incorporated into the  soil by rototilling to approximately 5 inches. 12
Recoveries of these pesticidal residues ranged from 2. 7 to 5. 3 percent
                                    119

-------
of the applied dosages.  Measurement was made 4 months after a soil-
surface application.  However, incorporation of the pesticides into the
upper soil layers increased the persistence of the  residues by a factor
of 10.  One year after treatment of the upper soil layers,  90 percent of
the recovered residues were located within the upper 3 inches of the
soil.   The highest concentration of the insecticides was found within the
second inch of the soil layer.  A deeper  penetration and a more equal
distribution of the residues was noticed  3 years after the  soil treatment.
       A field study examined losses of Dieldrin that had been disked
into a silt loarn soil to a depth of 7. 5 centimeters. In general, the
amount lost in the runoff water was a very small fraction of the quantity
applied.  At most, this amounted to 0. 07 percent of the original dosage
in the first season, with the largest losses occurring in th'e first 2 months
after application.  Highest Dieldrin concentration in the water was 20
micrograms per liter (|j.g/l) soon after application. Concentration was
                                          86
always less than 2 |o.g/l in the second year.
       Soil cultivation is one of many factors that  affects  the  disappear-
ance  of insecticides from soil. It must be cautioned that the disappear-
ance  of the pesticides from soil does not mean its  removal from the envi-
ronment.  After the application of the pesticide to  a soil,  a partitioning
among soil, water, and air takes place.   Distribution of the pesticide in
the environment is controlled by many variables  including temperature,
soil properties,  soil water content,  and  the nature of the pesticide.   The
increased loss of pesticides from cultivated soils can be partially ex-
plained by the continued exposure of new surfaces.  However, other fac-
tors such as soil moisture,  organic content, and temperatures will affect
              88
the loss  rate.
       The possibility of DDT accumulation in soils from spraying is
more likely in orchards and with crops where the green plants are turned
under  and incorporated into the soil after each harvest.  Pesticide m
ment  downward is aided by cultivation and rainfall and other natural
                                  120

-------
       In some newly developed irrigation fields  it was found that after
irrigation began, use of organophosphates and carbamates increased
greatly. "   The results indicate that irrigation water carries away some
of the applied pesticides which results in the need to increase pesticide
applications to compensate for the loss.  Results also showed that there
was  little vertical penetration of pesticides from  surface applications
(penetration did not exceed 12 inches).
       It is concluded that pesticides removed by irrigation runoff in
either the liquid form or settleable silt were only a small percentage of
the amount  applied.  Ground water contamination by pesticides perco-
lating through the soil from irrigation can be considered very slight.
Irrigation practices do not constitute major  problems for the aquatic
environment with respect to  contamination by pesticides.  'However,
factual assessment of this situation will only be obtained after thorough
investigation.  Information is needed regarding pesticidal residue distri-
bution, magnitude,  and persistence in the ecosystem resulting from irri-
gation practices.  Such information will permit long-range evaluation of
the effect of these chemicals and anticipate harmful environmental effects
before they occur.   No such  problem has been identified in the Southeast.
                       c.  Atmospheric Processes
       Pesticidal compounds may enter the  atmosphere in several ways
and  in various physical states and then be redeposited directly or indi-
rectly in the aquatic environment.  Direct drift from spraying operations
contributes particulate or globular matter at concentrations which are
likely to vary inversely with the distrance from the site of application.
Such effects are usually local but the possibility exists for a more exten-
sive influence.  Several organochlorine  insecticides volatilize from
treated soils, thus adding a slow but long-term contribution to the atmos-
phere. ^5 Effluents and vapors'from industrial processes, such as pesti-
cide manufacturing  or moth-proofing of garments,  also contribute.  Quan-
tities may accrue from the use of domestic aerosol insecticides and
                                  121

-------
thermal vaporizers and the dust from treated soil,  clothing, and carpets.
The concentration of these compounds  in air is lower by a factor of 10
                              05
to 100 times that in rainwater. 7~J
        Pesticides can be transported by wind and deposited in water far
from an area of application.  Even a trace of precipitation may  deposit
unusually large amounts of pesticides on sites far from the  source of the
contamination if it falls through windblown dust clouds.   Pesticides are
now considered to be universally present in the  air.  Their  distribution
to sites remote from application areas depends  on prevailing patterns of
wind circulation and deposition rates.  The potential for atmospheric con-
tamination and subsequent transport during field application of pesticides
is high.
        Since many variables are involved in aerial  applications  of pesti-
cides,  no limited study will elucidate all factors or  permit accurate pre-
diction of this mode of pesticide contamination. °° Atmospheric degra-
dation is enhanced by a highly dispersed particulate or droplet state.
Moisture,  light and oxygen are factors in determining the rate of hydro-
lysis, photodegradation and oxidation,  respectively.  The danger of inha-
lation is greater with stable pesticides.  To minimize atmospheric con-
tamination,  the development of less persistent and less volatile  pesticides
is needed.  Pesticide  application techniques must be improved to effect
maximum delivery efficiency of minimum quantities close to the target
under metereorologically  suitable conditions.
                           (I) Volatilization
        Pesticide residues may enter the atmosphere by codistillation
f              e    26, 97, 98  ,                                    no
from water surfaces         ,  by vaporization from plants and soils  ,
and by aerial drift during  application.  The DDT residues in precipitation
in south Florida averaged 1, 000 parts per trillion at four sites between
June, 1968 and May,  1969. °° Based on precipitation content  (80 parts
per trillion),  some have estimated that one quarter  of the total annual
                                  122

-------
production of DDT could eventually be transported to the ocean.   Volati-
lization can be a significant factor contributing-to the net loss of a pesti-
cide applied  to a crop or to a soil surface.12> 86> 101 Field experiments
involving Endrin application to sugar cane showed that  atmospheric con-
centration reached a maximum of 540 nanograms per cubic meter (ng/m3)
during the next three days.  This concentration decreased rapidly to
30 ng/m3, 77 days later.
       A water budget for  Birmingham, Alabama  indicates that  during
the months of July,  August, and September a deficit in soil moisture will
usually occur with the  rates of actual evapotranspiration being very high. 88
Thus,  the top soil layers will tend to be dry.  It has been reported that the
rate of volatilization from  a soil  decreases with a reduction of moisture
content in the soil.  As would be  expected,  the volatilization of pure pesti-
cides increases with temperature. 102 One would expect to find a much
higher pesticide  vapor pressure at the elevated ground temperatures found
in the Southeast.  However, there is  experimental evidence that increasing
                                                                    7 8
the temperature  results in a decrease in the relative vapor pressure.
This may be attributed to the formation of a stronger sorption force  soil
for pesticides in dry and less competition from water molecules for the
sorption sites of the dry soil.
       Experimental evidence,in conjunction with known meteorological
date for  the Southeast,suggests that during those months when the tempera-
tures are high and soil moisture  is depleted,  the  amounts  of pesticide
                         78
volatilization is reduced.
       The major source of DDT residues in soybean plants was  found to
occur through vapor movement from  contaminated soil surfaces.   In contrast
the presence of Dieldrin, Endrin, and Heptachlor resulted primarily from
root uptake and translocation through stems to leaves and seeds. 10:5  The
amount of DDT sorbed after vaporization from surface-treated soil was
found to  be 6. 8 times  greater than that obtained through root uptake.   DDT
                                123

-------
losses were at the rate of about 2 pounds per acre per year in summer


and about 0. 3 pound per acre per year in winter. 104 The implication is that


about half the DDT applied to field crops may enter the atmosphere.   The


soil moisture content and its influence on volatility was not considered in


the study.



       A direct relationship between the initial DDT concentration (below


100 |ig/l) and the DDT codistillation rate has been reported. 98 At the


highest concentration tested (1, 000 |ig/l),  the codistillation rate was as


much as six times greater than anticipated by theoretical dissemination


equations.   This finding is in agreement with DDT's  great affinity for the


air-water interfaces, which facilitates the high codistillation  rate.  How-


ever, the results  of this  study are subject to criticism since DDT solu-


bility is  in the order of 1 fig/1.  A non-homogeneous solution results when

                                                                    27
greater pesticide  concentrations are attempted at room temperature.



       Experimental studies of the  volatilization of soil-applied DDT  and


DDD (incorporated into commerce silt loam) from flooded and nonflooded


plots  showed that  within the  first two days,  the atmospheric concentration


of DDT at 10 centimeters dropped from a maximum value of 1977 to 58 ng/m3


above the flooded  plot and from 2041 to 100 ng/m3 above the nonflooded plot.


Corresponding levels of DDD decreased from 405 to  30 ng/m3 and from


575 to 92 ng/m3,  respectively.  It is evident that the flooding treatment


effectively retarded the  volatilization of both pesticides.   Major changes


in the atmospheric concentrations of both pesticides  above the nonflooded


plot^apparently^are related to certain climatological  factors.105



       An  investigation  of the volatilization of Lindane and DDT from four


types of  soils shows  that neither pesticide was volatilized at 30°  and 55°C


when the soils contained less than a monolayer coverage of water.   The


rate of pesticide loss was constant for each soil in the moisture range of


1/3 to 15 bars and the pesticides volatilized over a longer period of time


from the finer textured soil  than from the coarser textured soils.  For
                                   124

-------
Lindane and DDT at 30° C, the rate of volatilization from soil was in
descending order:   Valentine loamy sand,  Hand loam,  Raber silty clay
loam,  Promise clay.     It was assumed that an equilibrium existed
between the vapor phase and nonvapor phase  of the pesticides.  The
vapor density was independent of  water content until the water content
in the soil approached a monolayer.   Vapor density increased with
increases in pesticide concentration and increases in temperature,  but
decreased with increases  in surface area.   In order to explain the dif-
ferent vapor densities between moist soils, one must consider factors
regulating the  equilibrium between solid and solution phases as well as
diffusion in both the vapor and nonvapor phases.  Neutral pesticides pro-
bably are held to the mineral fraction of the soil by weak physical forces.
One would expect more retention  of the pesticide by the  organic fraction
of the  soil than the mineral surfaces.  Both types  of pesticide sorption
increase as surface area  and organic matter content increases.

       Aldrin  and Dieldrin disappeared rather rapidly from agar in glass-
                     107
covered petri dishes.     In most instances, this disappearance was con-
siderably retarded by inoculation with either fungi or bacteria.   Thus,
volatile compounds  which are low in water solubility may be lost to  the
atmosphere under sterile  conditions but this loss may be reduced by the
presence  of microorganisms which consume,  react, with or physically
cover  the compounds.

       Vapors are given off from Aldrin-,  Heptachlorphorate-,  Lindane-,
                                              108
Heptachlor  epoxide-, and Dieldrin-treated  soils.     An  increase in  the
rate of Aldrin  volatilization from the soil resulted from increases in
insecticide concentration  in the soil,  soil moisture, relative humidity
of air passing  over  the soil, soil  temperature, and the rate of air move-
ment over the  surface of the soil. A decrease in the rate of Aldrin vola-
tilization  was noted in dry soils containing  increased  amounts of clay
and organic matter   and in wet soils  containing increasing amounts of
organic matter.  Vapor loss of Trifluralin from water was found to  be
                                 125

-------
proportional to concentration, with losses being greater during a 12-hour
period than during an 8-hour period. 109 Placement of the herbicide below
the soil surface (0. 5-inch) resulted in a very low vapor loss for both
moisture regimes.
                       (2)  Dusting and Spraying
       Fallout from aerial pesticide application is a principal  source of
water contamination. 68»100> 110» m  High levels  of the atmospheric contam-
nation by pesticides  (DDT, Toxaphene, Parathion, and organophosphate)
have been measured in the agricultural areas of the Southeast including
Dothan, Alabama; Orlando,  Florida; and Stoneville,  Mississippi.  Higher
pesticide levels were found when pesticide spraying was reported than
                                 112
when no spraying was in progress.
       Aerial pesticidal sprays usually reach the target in amounts  equal
to or less than 50 percent of the quantity distributed.     During practically
every spray operation,  many nontarget organisms are killed.   Many of
these may  be predators of the organism that the spray attempts to control.
DDT residues may travel great distances once in the atmosphere,  and
eventually  enter the  aquatic environment through precipitation  or dry fall-
out processes.  Pesticidal drift from Mississippi cotton field applications
has killed a large number of fish, snakes, frogs, turtles, and  some egrets.111
Aerial spraying of organophosphate pesticides on farm land has caused se-
vere poisoning of a  farm worker and the death of a 16 year old boy. ^^
       Spray drift from agricultural sprays is influenced by many factors
such as sprayer design,  spray pressure, fluid properties,  and meteoro-
logical conditions.   Spray drift potential has been evaluated. 114
       Spray techniques and droplet size are closely related to the over-
all control of pesticide   residue passage to the  waterways.  An account
has been presented describing methods used, estimation of the spray cover-
age, and the size of  spray particles.115 Experimental results  showed that
150 microns mass median diameter  spray drops provided the most efficient
                                  126

-------
swath pattern for forest spraying.ll6  A review of findings between 1954 and
and 1961 showed that larger mass median diameter drops (500 micron)
required lower pressure,  and usually lower dosages,  than smaller drops
(100 micron mass median diameter) with essentially equivalent results.117
       It is necessary to further explore the significance of droplet size
on the effectiveness of pesticide spray applications.  There is a need to
define the significance of droplet size on potential contamination of the
water resources.  Spraying must be based on using the proper chemical
on a given  crop in the right amount at the right time.  Applications should
be terminated prior to harvest to prevent excessive residues on food and
fiber.
                       (3)  Windblown Materials
       Wind can sweep away surface  soil to which pesticides are sorbed.
These particles can be deposited into the aquatic environment by rain or
by settling processes. " High winds have  created dust clouds from which
precipitation has deposited an unusually large amount of contaminated soil.
In this case, selected samples showed 1. 3  parts per million of total chlo-
rinated  hydrocarbon.  Pesticides detected  were Chlordane, Heptachlor
epoxide, DDE, DDT,  Ronnel,  Dieldrin, and 2, 4, 5-T. 118  Deposits of
Malathion and Azinphosmethyl following aerial application were measured
at various  wind speeds and flight altitudes.  These pesticides were detected
as far as 800 meters (1/2 mile) downwind of application.  Estimated re-
coveries from  the adjacent areas,  into which the spray drifted,  ranged
from 18 to  96 percent of the amount applied. °°
       DDT residues have been found in the Antarctic. 119 The analytical
results  and the estimated  snow volume (2. 4-3. 0 x 1016 cubic meters) were
used to  project total DDT accumulation at 2. 4 x 10^ grams.  Concentra-
tions  of chlorinated hydrocarbons in airborne dust, carried by the trade
winds from the European-African land areas to Barbados, range from
                                  127

-------
less than 1 to 164 part per billion.  The lower limit of the average concen-
                                     ,  -14       120
tration in 1 cubic meter of air is 7. 8 x 10    gram.
        Analysis of rainwater and dust have revealed  the presence of
chloroorganic substances in all samples  examined.  Proof that pesticides
can be transported to earth by rainfall was obtained from a deposit of
dust on the Cincinnati, Ohio area on January 26,  1965. 12  It is reasonably
certain that soil is constantly being picked up by winds, transported at
high altitudes over long distances, and deposited elsewhere either by
sedimentation or by rain.  In order to minimize pesticidal losses from
the application area and possible  inhalation hazard due to wind-blown
treated soil, less persistent pesticides are preferable and applications
should be avoided on windy days.  Soil conservation practices  are also
quite important.
                       d.  Disposal Processes
        The problem  of the final disposition of pesticides falls  into two
categories:
        e   Disposal of pesticide residues and wastes  and
        o   Disposal of pesticide containers.
        Mississippi State  University has conducted studies with an over-
all view of the pesticide disposal  problem. *^2, 123 j^g waste  problem
is classfied  into three general catagories:
        o   Disposal by land burial,
        e   Disposal by chemical and thermal methods, and
        o  Recycling of waste and containers.
        Mixtures or formulations  were more biodegradable than single
pesticides, provided that at least one or two of the pesticides in a mix-
ture were relatively  easy to biodegrade. 122 However, biodegradation in
soil may result in the suppression of soil bacteria and favor growth of
Streptomycetes and fungi.  If fre  bacterial population is suppressed for an
                                128

-------
extended period of time,  important processes such as nitrification, nitro-
gen fixation, sulfur transformation, and others-are  endangered.  Thus,
the burial of pesticides presents problems beyond the contamination of
water.
       Chemical and thermal disposal methods were compared and it was
shown that incineration was superior to chemical methods.     Incineration
at 800 to 1, 200° C  for five minutes is the most effective method for the
disposal of pesticide wastes.  However,  the process in itself is not entirely
satisfactory.  Incineration without the entrapment of pesticides in the re-
sulting gases represents an environmental threat through air pollution.
Volatile pesticides and their degradation  products could conceivably en-
danger the surrounding countryside.  Another serious problem arises from
the residue that remains after incineration.  The quantity of residues can
be considerable and the residues may retain other toxic elements, such
as arsenic.  If pesticide  residues are to be disposed by burning,  it is pos-
sible that further chemical treatment will be needed.
       Little is known about pesticides released from incineration
municipal and industrial  wastes and treatment plant sludges.   Because of
the large                              atmospheric releases could be sig-
nificant and widely dispersed.
       Disposal of pesticide containers presents a particular problem.
These containers retain  substantial residue.  If the  container,  such as  a
metal drum,  is recycled, this problem is lessened.  However, if these
containers should be disposed by dumping,  the buildup of toxic material
could be significant and the material could subsequently be transported to
other areas by water movement.
       The magnitude of the problem can be illustrated by an example.
The number of containers reportedly used in the state of Mississippi in
1969 were:124
       •   55-gallon drums		---65,750
                                  129

-------
       •   30-gallon drums				---  16,000


       •   5-gallon  drums			---240,000


       .   1-galloncans		401> °°°


       •   0. 5-gallon (glass.*  metal, and plastic containers) --  35,000


       •   0.25-gallon (glass, metal and plastic containers)--  80,000



       A 1970 survey of 75 counties in Tennessee  indicated that 3, 332

                                                   124
empty pesticide containers were discarded as trash.



       Much remains  to be accomplished with respect to the safe dispo-


sition of used containers with pesticide residues although industry is  de-


veloping guidelines.    A nationwide disposal system should be initiated


as soon as possible. Open burning should be prohibited,  even in rural


areas, because of air contamination. Research is  needed specifically in


the following areas:


       o   Recycling techniques for pesticide containers,


       o   Chemical and biological  decontamination methods,  and


       e   Thermal degradation with special emphasis on

           incineration research.



                          5.  Case Studies



       A number of documented cases reported in the Southeast


of either intentional or accidental nature have been reviewed.



                           a. Intentional



       A Parathion and Methyl  arathion manufacturing plant in Alabama


dumped its effluent into a creek when its treatment plant failed in. 1961. ^7


Fish,  turtles, and snakes  died along 28 miles of the stream.  Traces of


Parathion residues were recovered from the Coosa River into which the


creek entered.  Lesser fish kills were reported 90 miles down the Coosa


River.



       Five pesticide-formulating companies dumped waste materials into


city sewers; channels and  sloughs near their plants; and onto city and
                                     130

-------
private dumps where they could be washed away by rainfall. 70


Pesticides residues (Dieldrin,  Aldrin, Endrin,  Isodrin, Chlordane,  Lin-


dance,  and DDT analogs and metabolites) varied in concentration from less


than 0. 5 ppm in river bottom muds to thousands of ppm in the vicinity of


the industrial plants in the lower Mississippi River basin.




        Dieldrin is used as a fungicide in an Augusta, Georgia,  wool scouring


plant.   This  plant discharges the chemical into  the Savannah River.  A simi-


lar plant previously used and discharged Dieldrin into the Ogeechee River


near Statesboro, Georgia,  but  an alternative is  now used. 12^



        Drums containing chemical wastes have  been  found in and along the


North  Sea.  The wastes were analyzed and found to contain lower chlorinated


aliphatic compounds,  vinyl esters, chlorinated  aromatic amines and nitro-


compounds,  and the insecticide Endosulfan.   ^   This could occur in the


Southeast where pesticidal wastes and containers require disposition.



        A fish kill took place in Indian Swamp, North  Carolina,  on or about


June 10, 1971.  This occurred when a person deliberately discharged about


two gallons of Chlordane solution into the surface waters.  On June 14 and


15, 1971, Indian Swamp waters  exceeded from 2  to 10  times the recognized

                          1 O Q
toxic limits of Chlordane.    Another fish kill  occurred on  July 6,  1971 in


Bear Swamp Creek at S.  R. 1301 and was caused by spent pesticide jugs. *^9


The jugs,  containing Endosulfan, were thrown onto the  bank  and allowed


Endosulfan to enter the creek.



        Over-aged Parathion bags  (15 percent dust) were dumped into the


Peace River near a bridge one  mile upstream from the municipal water

                                                   67
intake of Arcadia,  Alabama, a  town of 6, 000 people.     All  but 8 to 12 bags


were eventually recovered. Subsequent analysis showed less than l|o,g/l


concentrations in the local water distribution system.



        Disposal of waste containers and discharge of pesticides into the


aquatic environment endangers  the aquatic life and results in damage to


fishing operations.  Measures must be taken to  stop this practice.  Proper
                                     131

-------
methods for disposal of un-used pesticides, pesticide wastes, and pesti-
cide containers have been described.122'130 Joint federal,  state, local,
and industrial regulatory effort is  requisite as it concerns safe disposal
of empty pesticide containers, wastes,  over-aged and unwanted pesticides.
                            b.  Accidental
       Accidents,  caused by spills of pesticides in the Southeast, have
been reported.  Studies of Parathion and Azinphosmethyl residues from
accidental and deliberate (research) spills showed that these compounds
                                         pi
do not break down as rapidly as  expected.    The soils studied were
silt loam with high organic content and pH of about 5. 0.  The plots  were
exposed to weathering and routine  sprinkler irrigation.  In the top one
inch of soil,  Parathion and Azinphosmethyl concentrations were reduced
by 46 and 10 percent, respectively, over a two-year period.
       A comprehensive  examination has been performed on a shallow
farm  well contaminated with persistent pesticides. 131  The well was lo-
cated less than 25 feet  from a site previously used for  flushing  an insecti-
cide sprayer.  Pesticide  levels in  the water have been  monitored for more
than 4 years,  during which time a  gradual decline in concentration has
occurred.  Soil core samples indicate  a relatively high surface contami-
nation but very little downward percolation.  Sediment  samples from the
bottom of the well exhibit the highest concentration of all samples.
       Surveys of the chlorinated pesticide levels in South Atlantic  and
Gulf of Mexico oysters, occasionally exhibit high concentrations of chlori-
                 132
nated pesticides.     This indicates a possible future problem i.e.,  contami-
nation of shellfish-growing waters.  These waters should be kept under
surveillance.
       The fire ant control areas of the Southeast,  whether  treated with
Heptachlor or Dieldrin, reported disastrous effects on aquatic life.  In
Wilcox County,  Alabama,  most adult fish were killed within a few days
after treatment.  Fish  from ponds  in a  treated area of Florida were found
                                    132

-------
to contain residues of Heptachlor and a derived chemical,  Heptachlor
expoxide.
       Mirex has been used extensively since 1962 in the Southeast to com-
bat the fire ant.  The United States Department of Agriculture contemplated
a full eradication program.  Mirex was to be applied aerially over 126 mil-
lion acres.  The project was  to require twelve years and cost an estimated
200 million dollars.  z°  Mirex is highly persistent in the natural environ-
ment and has  been shown to be moderately carcinogenic in laboratory
mice.   '     In short-term field tests,  Mirex has been shown to exhibit
a relatively low acute toxicity to marine crustaceans.   However, subse-
quent long-term studies have demonstrated delayed toxic effects on crabs
and shrimp.  Eighty percent mortality in shrimp and 60 percent mortality
in crabs occurred when they were exposed to only 0.1 mg/l'of mirex  in
water for 15 days.  ^° Because it is very insoluble in water and very solu-
ble in animal fat, the chemical moves rapidly from water into aquatic
species and up the aquatic food chain.   Current spraying techniques involve
Mirex impregnated corn cobs.  This is a risky practice because the un-
touched bait may eventually be carried into waterways by runoff.  Incorpo-
ration of the bait into the soil may solve this problem.  A national survey
of 5, 000 oysters and other  shellfish has demonstrated that Mirex is the
fourth most commonly found pesticide residue.     It was also reported
that Mirex contaminates shellfish in estuarine drainage areas of the
Southern states.
       During the summer of 1950, insect infestation was unusally great
in northern Alabama and some 80 to 95 percent of the cotton  farmers began
heavy applications  of Toxaphene. 3>  ' 133 An acre of cotton was sprayed
with 63 pounds of Toxaphene.  Frequent and heavy rains washed the pesti-
cide into nearby streams and caused extensive fish kills in 15 tributaries of
the Tennessee River.  Two of these streams are municipal water  supplies
but no harmful effects to humans  were reported.
                                   133

-------
       Fish kills occurred in Choccolocco Creek and in the Coosa River
                                          1 *2 *7
near Anniston, Alabama, during May,  1961.     Parathion and/or related
organic phosphorus compounds were accidentally released by a local
chemical company.  The pesticides entered Choccolocco Creek via the
Anniston city  wastewater treatment plant.
       In March,  1965,  2, 500 to 3, 000 pounds of 5 percent Chlordane
wettable powder were spilled from a truck passing through Orlando,  Florida.
As much as possible  was salvaged from the street.  From 1, 300 to 1, 700
pounds were lost into the street's storm drainage system from which it
passed into a  dry creek bed near one of the city's lakes.  When the poten-
tial danger to the lake was realized,  the concentrated water and soil were
disposed.    The study did not cite the means of disposal.
       On September 4, 1967,  a truck lost a drum of Malathion in Cordele,
Georgia.   °  The Malathion spilled in the  street.   The local fire department
was  called to  clean up the  street as a traffic safety precaution.   The Mala-
thion was washed into the storm sewer system which discharges into Gum
Creek,  a tributary to the Flint River impoundment,  known as Lake Blackshear.
A 0. 32 inch rainfall occurred that night.   The next day  a  massive fish kill
was  reported  in Gum Creek. On November 2, 1969 another fish kill was
reported on Gum Creek. 138 gy November 4,  fish were dying over a three
mile reach of the stream below the Cordele wastewater treatment plant.
Approximately 1, 500 fish were killed.  The fish kill was likely the result of
Malathion entering Gum Creek through the city wastewater treatment plant.
In August,  1971, a minor fish kill at a state fish hatchery  near Cordele was
evidence of indiscriminate spraying by a local duster.   "  Two fungicides,
Benlate and Isobac 20,  were being sprayed on an adjacent 90-acre peanut
field.
       Three  fish kills are reported for the state of North Carolina.  The
first and third were caused by pesticides that washed into the stream by
heavy rainfall from cultivated fields.  The first occurred in Symonds Creek
                                   134

-------
beginning in May of 1970.  The water was found to contain less than
0.001 mg/1 of Preforam.  Significant concentrations of insecticides such
as Toxaphene were measured in the bottom samples and in the flesh of the
fish samples.     The  second occurred in Hyde County between August 27,
1970 and September 2,  1970, and was caused by aerial overflights of crop-
spraying aircraft applying DDT, ODD, DDE, Parathion,  Thiodan,  Toxaphene,
and Sevin to  soybean fields in the area.  These aircraft were observed to be
discharging pesticides  into the surface waters. 141  The third occurred in
Lake Junaluska on November 21, 1970.  It was  caused by Endrin and the kill
continued until the latter part of March,  1971. 142
       On June 20, 1971, a fire of about ten hours duration occured at an
agricultural  chemical warehouse in Farmville, North Carolina. 143  The
warehouse contained a wide assortment of hazardous chemicals including
pesticides.   Water was used to extinguish the fire.  Dikes were constructed
to retain these waters  until they could be pumped to polyethylene-lined pits.
This particular incident points out the need for a rapid response program for
unusually hazardous  situations.
       An aerial application of 30 pounds per acre of 10 percent Dieldrin
was made near Spring  Creek, Hardeman County,  Tennessee on March 24,
1961. Approximately 3,400 acres were treated.  Various species of ter-
restrial animals, fish,  reptiles,  and  crustaceans were found dead as a re-
sult of this treatment.     On February 2,  1962, 1, 500 acres in and near the
north end of Bradley County, Tennessee, were treated with 10 percent
Dieldrin at the  rate of  30 pounds per acre by airplane dusting to combat an
infestation of white fringe beetle.  Various kinds of fish and animals were
found dead as a result  of this treatment. *-^
       On May 22, 1962, approximately 800 acres  in the Crandull area of
Johnson County, Tennessee, were sprayed with 10 percent Dieldrin at 2
pounds per acre. Fish mortality began downstream from the treated  area  on
the first day after application and continued to  be heavy for the next four
days.  As a result of the nearly complete decimation of the resident fish
                                  135

-------
population and the possible public health hazard,  Beaver Dam Creek was
closed to public fishing for the remainder of the 1-962 season. ^
       A heavy fish kill was reported on or about August 21,  1969 in the
lower 11.4 miles of Beans Creek near Elora, Tennessee.   The cause was
Endrin and Methyl parathion associated with runoff from cotton fields.
An estimated 73, 712 fish were killed. 146
       Although awareness of safety in handling pesticides is increasing,
the task  gets more complex as new chemicals are developed. Educational
efforts must reach the entire population including scientists,  regulatory
officials, educators, industralists, and the users of pesticides.  The rea-
sons for accidents are preoccupation,  clumsiness,  forgetfulness, disre-
gard, inattention, unpreparedness, distraction, and in general, a common
denominator-lack of awareness.      The goal must be complete protection
of the food supply from pesticide residues, protection of the aquatic envi-
ronment from pesticide  contamination  and total elimination of pesticide
accidents.    Safe handling procedures in pesticidal application must be
followed by all users to  prevent future  accidental spills. 125,147, 151
                            6.  Conclusions
        After two decades of intensive  use, pesticides are found through-
 out the world.  They are present in the aquatic environment and in the
 atmosphere,  even in places far from any spraying sites.  The persistent
 nature of certain pesticides permits them to be carried from the air and
 soil into the aquatic environment.  There they can move from one organism
 to another via the food web or be cycled in the aquatic environment.
        Physical and chemical properties of pesticides govern their move-
 ment from one  system to another. Sorption and desorption are the pro-
 cesses which limit the rate of movement of pesticides from the soil into
 the aquatic environment.  Specific sorption and desorption mechanisms
 for each pesticde under  environmental conditions are not known.  These
 mechanisms are influenced by the clay and organic content,  temperature
                                  136

-------
degree of cation saturation within the soil, and by climatic conditions.
These factors also influence pesticide sorption-tiesorption at the benthic
level of the aquatic  environment.

       Pesticide movement into the soil environment is influenced by
sorption, thermal and biomass characteristics, and general chemical
composition.  Knowledge  of the chemical and physical nature of pesti-
cides facilitates a prediction of their fate.  Common fates in the soil
environment are sorption and desorption,  photo- and oxidative decompo-
sition, hydrolytic and biochemical degradation,  leaching, and phyto-
assimilation.  Organic matter favors Sorption of both non-ionic and ionic
pesticides.  The soils of the Southeast have a high clay content and sorp-
tion of mostly ionic pesticides is anticipated.  Many of the pesticides
applied to the soil are strongly sorbed and do not percolate through the
soil. Pesticides normally are  confined to  the top few inches of the soil.
       Pesticides in the soil are generally in contact with water.   The
quantity of water may significantly alter their  reactions.  For example,
phytoactivity is greatly  enhanced in moist soil.  Solubilities; partitioning
(soil, water,  and air); and interaction of these  properties alter the reac-
tions of individual pesticides.
       The sorption process and its binding power  must be examined re-
lative to leaching.   Leaching of pesticides deserves greater attention
because  this is  the process  of most rapid  movement from the soil into
the aquatic environment.
       The direct movement of pesticides from the soil surface to a
waterway requires consideration of climatic conditions before,  during
and after application.  Principal consideration  should be given to volatili-
zation losses,  movements into the soil,  persistence at  the site of appli-
cation,  and movement of the remaining fraction to uncontaminated areas.
       Pesticides move into the aquatic environment from the land even
though universally present in the air. Movement from  land may take
                                    137

-------
several forms but overland drainage is the most significant.   Good con-
servation practices  reduce overland drainage.  The occurrence of
pesticides in waterways is primarily attributed to their sorption by run-
off particles.   Deposition and subsequent desorption of the sorbed par-
ticles will provide a continuous source of pesticide to the  aquatic en-
vironment.
       Considerations should be given to rainfall as a climatic factor
influencing pesticide movement into water.  Pesticides movement into
and over the soil is  of a uniform nature during periods of  low  rainfall
intensity.  This also occurs during overhead and flood irrigation practices.
High rainfall  intensity and furrow irrigation, however, produce dispro-
portionate pesticide movements.  This movement can result in waterway
contamination.
       Pesticides enter the  soil environment through mechanical in-
corporation or infiltration processes.  Incorporation (or induced turn-
over) is favored since it  reduces atmospheric and runoff contamination.
However,  plant uptake and persistence of pesticides is increased.
       Information  on pesticide decontamination is needed.  Sorption by
activated carbon is  the only  method presently available for removing
pesticides from water.  However,  suitable methods for disposal of the
sorbed materials has  not been developed.  Thermal,  photochemical and
biological  degradation are considered as possible decontamination methods
in instances where concentrated pesticides occur.  Photochemical  bio-
logical and sorption processes offer potential for removal of low-level
concentrations in waterways.
       Current agricultural application practices result in contamination
of the aquatic environment through atmospheric processes.  Those pro-
cesses which  contribute to contamination include volatilized fallout and
washout, drift from dusting  and spraying operations,  and wind-blown,
pesticide-treated soils.  Other aerial or atmospheric  routes include
                                  138

-------
incineration of pesticide contaminated materials and direct application
of pesticides into the aquatic environment.

       Case  studies have documented that runoff, accidental spills, and
intentional pesticide dumping are prevalent means of entry into the aquatic

environment.   Non-selective toxicity and subtle long-term effects can

create ecological imbalances.   Therefore,  there is an urgent need to

use existing and  safer pesticide alternatives, to better educate pesti-

cide users regarding potential hazards,  and to limit usage of persistent
pesticides.

                         7.  Recommendations

1.     Federal and state pesticide  control programs should be expanded

       to promote  the development of more selective, less persistent,
       less volatile pesticides,  and more efficient application methods.

2.     The Environmental Protection Agency should coordinate with
       other governmental agencies, e.g. USDA, U. S. Army Corps
       of Engineers, and state environmental agencies, to:

       •      Strengthen the present air, soil,  and  water monitoring
               programs.  Specifically,  improvements in planning,
               sampling, analytical testing and reporting are needed
               and  additional intergovernmented cooperation is required; and

       •       Upgrade the educational training programs for the general
               public to increase the awareness of the hazards of pesti-
               cides to the aquatic environment.

3.     The Environmental Protection Agency Pesticides  Office should

       sponsor research to:

       •       Reexamine the registration of pesticides which persist
               in the environment more than one year and those that
               are  soluble in animal fat.  Registration should be can-
               celled if safe, effective alternative methods are available;

       •       Define the details of  persistent pesticide sorption and de-
               sorption processes in relation to the  specific soils and
              aquatic bottom sediments of the Southeast.   The competi-
              tive  relationship of water and pesticides for the sorptive
                                  139

-------
              sites on organic and inorganic substrates should be
              determined.  Other dynamic forces contributing to
              physical movement of pesticides-should be elucidated
              under natural environmental conditions;

       •      Ascertain the concentrations  of pesticides added to
              the aquatic  environment through current irrigation
              practices'; and

       •      Determine the contribution of pesticides to the
              aquatic soil environment by  atmospheric fallout and
              washout.

4.     The Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Office

       s hould:

       •      Promote development of standard methods and pro-
              cedures for use in decontamination of highly concentrated
              pesticide spillage.  Practical and efficient jdecontamina-
              tion procedures for low-level pesticide concentrations,
              regardless  of source, should also be expanded.

       •      Develop water quality standards which establish strict
              limits on pesticide concentrations in effluents from
              point sources, industrial and municipal outfalls.  State
              water quality control offices should be responsible for
              enforcement of the standards.

       •      Undertake an educational and training program through
              state agencies to train selected local government per-
              sonnel in emergency procedures to  protect the aquatic
              environment from pesticide spills.

5.     The Environmental Protection Agency Air Pollution Control
       Office should:

       •      Establish standards for incineration of pesticides and
              their containers.

       •      Promote investigations into thermal degradation of
              pesticides.

6.     The Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste Management

       Office should develop  safe disposal techniques for waste pesti-
       cides and pesticide containers when landfill and recycling
                                   140

-------
       methods are employed.  These techniques  should provide for

       chemical and/or biological decontamination of the wastes.

7.     The Department of Agriculture should:

       •       Encourage the incorporation of pesticides into the soil
               to minimize the effects of overland drainage and atmos-
               pheric contamination of the  aquatic environment; and

       •       Examine the use of pesticides where furrow irrigation
               is practiced.

8.     The Soil Conservation Service should expand its soil erosion
       program to emphasize soil retention on pesticide-treated

       fields.

9.     Federal and state governments, in  collaboration with industry,
       should  expand their research programs to  improve application
       techniques.  The studies should determine optimal droplet size
       and area coverage relationships, while considering vaporization
       and drift effects.
                                  141

-------
                            8.  References
 1.  Bailey,  G. W. ,  Entry of Biocides into Water Courses, Proceedings
    of Symposium on Agricultural Waste Waters, Water Resources Center,
    University of California, Davis, California, Report No. 10,  94-103,
    1966.

 2.  Kearney,  P. C. and Helling,  C. S. ,  Reactions of Pesticides in Soils,
    Residue Reviews, 25, 25-44, 1969.

 3.  Nicholson, H. P.,  Insecticide Pollution of Water Resources, Journal
    American Water Works  Association, .51,  981-986, 1959.

 4.  Stewart, D.  K.  R. , Chisholm,  D. ,  and Ragab, M. T. H. , Long
    Term Persistence  of Parathion in Soil, Nature, 229, 47, 1971.

 5.  Lichtenstein, E. P. and Schulz, K. R. , Effects of Moisture and
    Microorganisms on the Persistence and Metabolism of Some Organo-
    phosphorus Insecticides in Soils, With Special Emphasis on Parathion,
    Journal of Economic Entomology, 57, No.  5, 618-627,  1964.

 6.  Eichelberger, J. W. and Litchenberg, J.  J.,  Persistence of Pesticides
    in River Water,  Environmental Science and Technology, 5_, 541-544,
    1971.                                                   ~

 7.  Nash, R.  G. and Woolson, E. A. ,  Persistence of Chlorinated Hydro-
    carbon Insecticides in Soils,  Science, 157, 924-927,  1967.

 8.  Hermanson, H.  P. , Gunther,  F. A. , Anderson,  L. D.  and Garber,
    M.  J. ,  Installment Application Effects upon Insecticide Residue
    Content of a California Soil, J. Agr. Food Chem. , 19.  No. 4,  722-
    726, 1971.

 9.  Lichtenstein, E. P. and Schulz, K. R. , Effect of Soil Cultivation,
    Soil Surface and Water on the Persistence  of Insecticidal Residues
    in Soils, Journal of Economic Entomology,  54, No. 3,  517-522, 1961.

10.  Lichtenstein, E. P. and Schulz, K. R. , Persistence of Some Chlori-
    nated Hydrocarbon Insecticides as Influenced by Soil Type, Rate of
    Application and Temperature, Journal of Economic Entomology  52
    No. 1,  124-131,  1959.                                            —

 11.  Lichtenstein, E. P., Fuhremann,  T. W. ,  and Schulz, K. R. ,  Persis-
    tence and Vertical Distribution of DDT, Lindane and Aldrin Residues,
    10 and 15 Years  After a  Single Soil Application, J.  Agr. Food Chem
    _W,  718-721,  1971.
                                    142

-------
12.  Lichtenstein, E.  P.,  Mueller, G. H. ,  Myrdal, G.  R. ,  and Schulz,
    K.  R. ,  Vertical Distribution and Persistence of Insecticidal Residues
    in Soils as Influenced by Mode of Application and A Cover Crop,
    Journal of Economic Entomology, 55, No. 2, 215-219,  1962.

13.  Cullimore, D. R. ,  Interaction Between Herbicides and Soil Micro-
    organisms, Residue Reviews,  35. 65-80,  1971.

14.  Newman, A.  S.  and Downing, C. R. , Herbicides  and the Soil,  J.
    Agr. FoodChem.,  6_,  No. 5,  352-353,  1958.

15.  Kearney, P.  C. , Woolson,  E. A., Plimmer, J. R. , and Isensee,
    A.  R. , Decontamination of Pesticides in Soils,  Residue Reviews,
    2^,  137-149,  1969.

16.  Duxbury, J.  M. , Tiedje, J.  M. , Alexander, M. and Daws on, J. E. ,
    2,  4-D Metabolism Equal Enzymatic Conversion of Chloromaley-
    lacetic Acid to Succinic Acid, J. Agr.  FoodChem., ^8, No. 2,
    199-201, 1970.

17.  Kunze, G.  W. , Pesticides and Clay Minerals, Pesticides and Their
    Effects on Soils  and Water, Soil Science Society of America, Inc. ,
    Madison, Wisconsin,  49-71,  1966.

18.  Bailey, G.  W. and White, J.  L. ,  Review of Adsorption and Desorp-
    tion of Organic Pesticides by Soil Colloids,  With Implications
    Concerning Pesticide Bioactivity, J. Agr. Food Chem. ,  12, No. 4,
    324-332,  1964.

19.  Baker, R. A. and Luh, M.  D. , Biodegradability Factor in Organic -
    Clay Sorption, Clays  and Clay Minerals, 18, No.  6,  365-366,  1970.

20.  Luh, M.  D. and Baker,  R.  A., Organic Sorption From Aqueous
    Solution by Two  Clays, to be Published in the Proceedings  of the
    25th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,  May, 1970.

21.  Street, G.  B. and White, D. , Adsorption by Organo-clay Derivatives,
    J. Appl.  Chem., 13_,  288-291,  1963.

22.  Baker, R. A. and Luh, M.  D. , Pyridine Sorption From Aqueous
    Solution by Montmorillonite and Kaolinite, Presented Before the
    Division of Water,  Air,  and Waste Chemistry, American Chemical
    Society, Chicago, Illinois, September 13-18, 1970; to be published
    in Water  Research, 1971.
                                     143

-------
23.  Luh, M.  D. and Baker, R. A.,  Sorption and Desorption of Pyridine  -
     Clay in Aqueous Solution, Presented Before_the Division of Water,
     Air, and Waste Chemistry,  American Chemical Society, Los Angeles,
     California, March 28-April 2,  1971; to be published in Water Research,
     1971.

24.  Huang, J. C. and Liao, C. S. , Adsorption of Pesticides by Clay
     Minerals, Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division,  ASCE,  96,
     No. SA5,  Proceeding Paper 7603, 1057-1078, 1970.

25.  Huang, J. C. , Effect of Selected Factors on Pesticide Sorption and
     Desorption in the Aquatic System, J. Wat.  Pol. Cont. Fed. 43,  No.  8,
     1739-1748,  1971.

26.  Huang, J. C. , Organic Pesticides in the Aquatic Environment, Water
     and Sewage Works,  118, No. 5, 129-144, 1971.

27.  Bailey,  G. W. , Adsorption of Pesticides by Clay Minerals, Journal
     of the Sanitary Engineering Division, Proceedings of  the American
     Society of Civil Engineers, 97_, No.  SA4, 533-535, 1971.

28.  Pavoni,  J. L. and Hagerty,  J. , Absorption of Pesticides by  Clay
     Minerals, Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division,  Proceedings
     of the American Society of Civil Engineers,  97, No.  SA2, 243-245,
     1971.

29.  Miller,  R. W. and Faust, S. D. ,  Sorption From Aqueous Solutions
     by Organo Clays, I.  2,  4-D by Bentone 24,  Symposium of the
     Division of Pesticide Chemistry, I6lst ACS National Meeting,
     Los Angeles, California,  1971.

30.  Schwartz, H. G. , Jr. ,  Absorption of Selected Pesticides on Activated
     Carbon and Mineral Surfaces, Environmental Sciences and Technology,
     1, 332-337, 1967.

31.  Hamaker, J,  W.  Goring,  C. A. I. ,  and Youngson, C. R. ,  Sorption
     and Leaching of 4-Amino-3, 5, 6-Trichloro-Picolinic Acid in Soils,
     Organic Pesticides in the Environment,  Advances in Chemistry
     Series 60, American Chemical Society,  23-37,  1966.

32.  Bailey, G. W. , White,  J. L. ,  and Rothberg, T. , Adsorption of
     Organic Herbicides by Montmorillonite - Role of pH and  Chemical
     Character of  Adsorbate, Soil Science Society of America Proceedings
     3,2,  No.  2,  222-234,  1968.                                           '

33.  Miller, C.  W. , Dieldrin Persistence in Cranberry Bogs, Journal
     of Economic Entomology, 59,  No. 4, 905-906, 1966.
                                   144

-------
34.  Bartha,  R. , Fate of Herbicide -Derived Chloroanilines in Soil,  J.
    Agr. FoodChem.,  19, No.  2,  385-387. 1971.

35.  Herring, J. and Cotton,  D. , Pesticide Residue of Twenty Mississippi
    Delta Lakes, Presented at the 24th Annual Meeting,  Southeastern
    Association of Game and Fish Commissioners, Atlanta,  Gerogia,
    September 28-30,  1970.

36.  Rowe, D. R. , Canter, L.  W. , and Mason,  J. W. ,  Contamination
    of Oysters by Pesticides, Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division,
    Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 96, No. SA5,
    1221-1234,  1970.

37.  Warnick,  S. L. ,  Gaufin, R. F. , and Gaufin, A. R. , Concentrations
    and Effects of Pesticides in Aquatic Environments,  Journal American
    Water Works, Association, 58, No. 5,  601-608, 1966.

38.  Burdick, G. E. ,  Harris, E. J., Dean,  H.  J. ,  Walker, T. M. ,  Skea,
    J. and Colby,  D.  The Accumulation of DDT in Lake Trout and the
    Effect on Reproduction,  Am.  Fish. Soc. Trans., 93, No. 2, 127-
    136,  1964.

39.  Cox, J.  L. , DDT Residues in Marine Phytoplankton, Science, 170,
    71-72, 1970.

40.  Terriere,  L. C. ,  Kllgemagi, U. , Gerlach,  A. R. and Borovicka,
    R. L. ,  The Persistence of Toxaphene in Lake Water and Its Uptake
    by Aquatic Plants and Animals, J.  Agr. Food Chem. ,  14, 66-69,
    1969.

 41.  Lichtenstein, E.  P. , Schulz, K. R. , Skrnetny and Stitt,  P. A. ,
    Inse'cticidal Residues in Cucumbers and Alfalfa Grown on Aldrin
    or Heptachlor Treated Soils, Journal of Economic Entomology,  58,
    No. 4,  742-746, 1965.

42.  Wheeler,  W. B. , Moye, H.  A. ,  Van Middlelem, C. H. , Thompson,
    N. P. ,  Tappan, W. B. ,  Residues of Endrin and DDT in Turnips
    Grown in Soil Containing These Compounds, Pesticide Monitoring
    J., 3_, No. 2,  72-76, 1969.

43.  Barrentine, B. F.  and Cain, J. D. ,  Residues of Endrin and DDT
    in Soybeans Grown on Soil Treated with These Compounds, Pesticides
    Monitoring J. ,  3,  No. 2, 77-79, 1969.

44.  Reed, J. K. and Priester,  L.  E. ,  DDT Residues in Tobacco and
    Soybeans Grown in Soil Treated With DDT,  Pesticides Monitoring
    J.,  3, No. 2,  87-89, 1969.
                                   145

-------
45.  Sheets,  T.  J. ,  Jackson, M.  D. ,  Mistric, W.  J. ,  and Campbell,
     W. V. ,  Residues of DDT and Dieldrin in Peanuts and Tobacco
     Grown on Contaminated Soil, Pesticides Monitoring J. ,  3, No.  2,
     80-86, 1969.

46.  Lindquist,  D. A., Hackaylo, J., and Davich,  T.  B. , Effect of Light
     and Humidity on the Absorption and Translocation of Dimethoate in
     the Cotton Plant, Journal of  Economic Entomology, 58, No.  3, 415-
     418, 1965.

47.  Lichtenstein, E.  P. ,  Myrdal,  G. R. ,  and Schulz,  K. R. , Absorption
     of Insecticidal Residues from Contaminated Soils into Five Carrot
     Varieties,  J. Agr.  Food Chem. , 13,  No. 2,  126-131, 1965.

48.  MacPhee, A. W. , Chisholm, D. ,  and MacEachern,  C. R. ,  The
     Persistence of  Certain Pesticides in The Soil and Their Effect on
     Crop  Yields, Can.  J. Soil Sci. , 40, 59-62, I960.

49.  Upchurch,  R. P. , Behavior  of Herbicides in Soil,  Residue Reviews,
     16, 46-85,  1966.

50.  Carter, F. L. ,  Stringer, C. A. , and Beal, R. H. , Penetration and
     Persistence of  Soil Insecticides Used for Termite  Control, Pest
     Control, The Harvest Publishing Company, October,  1970.

51.  Luthin,  J.  N. ,  Movement of Water Through Soils, Relationship of
     Agriculture to Soil  and Water Pollution,  Cornell University
     Conference on Agricultural Waste Management, Rochester, New
     York, 21-28, 1970.

52.  LeGrand, H. E. , Movement of Pesticides in the Soil, Pesticides
     and Their Effects on Soils and Water,  Soil Science Society of
     America, Inc. ,  Madison, Wisconsin, 71-77, 1966.

53.  Linsley, R. K. ,  Jr., Kohler,  M.  A., and Paulhus, J. L.  H. ,
     Hydrology for Engineers, New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. , Inc. ,
     122-124,  128, 129, 132, 162,  169, 170, 187, 278, and 279,  1958.

54.  Todd, D. K. , Ground Water  Hydrology,  New York: John Wiley &
     Sons,  Inc.,  14,  17,  20,  44, 58-60,  178, 190 and 194, 1967.

55.  R. S.  K. W.  R. C.  , Characteristics and Pollution Problems of
     Irrigation Return Flow, Robert S. Kerr  Water Research Center
     Federal Water  Pollution Control Administration,  U. S.  Department
     of the Interior,  67-69, 103-107, 112, May, 1969.
                                146

-------
56.  Rudd, R. L. ,  Pesticides  Residues, Pesticides and the Living Land-
    scape,  Madison,  Wisconsin:  The University of Wisconsin Press,
    159-171, 1970.

57.  Swoboda, A.  R. ,  Thomas,  G.  W. , Cady,  F. B. , Baird, R.  W. ,  and
    Knisel,  W. G. , Distribution of DDT and Toxaphene in Houston Black
    Clay on Three Water Sheds, Environmental Science and Technology,
    5_,  141-143,  1971.

58.  Edwards,  W. M.  and Glass, B.  L. ,  Methoxychlor  and 2,  4,  5-T in
    Lysimeter  Percolation and Runoff Water,  Bulletin of  Environmental
    Contamination &  Toxicology, _5,  No.  4, 81-84, 170.

59.  Champlin,  J. B.  F. , The Movement of Micron-Size Particles Through
    a Sand Bed, Water  Resources Center Publication No.  0867,  Georgia
    Institute of Technology, 1967.

60.  Harrison,  H.  L.  , Loucks,  O. L. , Mitchell, J. W. , Parkhurst, D. F. ,
     Tracy,  C.  R. , Watts, D.  G. , and Yannacone, V.  J. , Jr., Systems
     Studies of DDT Transport,  A Systems Analysis Provides New Insights
     for Predicting  Long-term Impacts of DDT in Ecosystems, Science,
     170, 503-508, 1970.

 61.  Faust,  S. D. and Aly, O. M. , Water Pollution by Organic Pesticides,
     Journal American Water  Works Association, 56,  No. 3, 267-279,
     1964.

62.  Thomaston, W. W. ,  Annual Progress Report, Partial Poisoning
     Small Impoundments,  Statewide Fisheries Investigations F-21-2,
     State Game and Fish Commission, Atlanta,  Georgia,  January 1-
     December  31, 1-9,  1969.

63.  Thomaston, W. W. ,  Annual Progress Report, Aquatic Weed Control,
     Statewide Fisheries Investigations F-21-1,  State Game and Fish
     Commission, Atlanta, Georgia,  January 1 - December  31, 1-6, 1969.

64.  Smith,  G.  E. and Isom,  B. G, ,  Investigations of Effects of Large-
     Scale Applications  of 2, 4-D on Aquatic Fauna and Water Quality,
     Pesticides  Monitoring J. , _1, No.  3, 16-21,  1967.

65. Niering, W. A. ,  The Effects of Pesticides, Environmental Problems,
    J.  B. Lippincott  Company, 104-105, 1968.

66. Ahiens, J.  F. , Lenonard, O. A.  and Townly,  N. R. , Chemical
    Control of  Tree Roots in  Sewer Lines,  J.  Wat. Pol. Cont. Fed. ,
    42, 1643-1655,  1970.
                                  147

-------
67.  Nicholson,  H. P. and Hill, D.  W. , Pesticide Contaminants in
     Water and Mud and Their Environmental Impact,  Relationship of
     Agriculture to Soil and Water Pollution, Cornell University Conference
     on Agricultural Waste Management, Rochester, New York, 171-179,
     1970.

68.  Spencer, D. A.,  Trends in Pesticide Use,  Environmental  Science
     and Technology, 4_,  478-481,  1971.

69.  Barthel,  W. F. ,  Parsons, D. A.,  McDowell,  L.  L. and Grissinger,
     E. H. , Surface Hydrology and Pesticides, Pesticides and Their
     Effects on Soils and Water, Soil Science Society of America, Inc. ,
     Madison, Wisconsin,  128-144, 1966.

70.  Barthel,  W. F. ,  Hawthorne, J. C. , Ford,  J.  H. , Bolton,  G. C. ,
     McDowell,  L. L. , Grissinger, E.  H. ,  and Parsons, D. A., Pesticides
     in Water, Pesticide Monitoring J. , 3, 8-66, 1969.

71.   Lichtenberg,  J. J., Eichelberger,  J. W. , Dressman,  R.  C. , and
     Longbottom,  J. E. , Pesticides in Surface Waters of the United
     States -- A 5-Year  Summary, 1964-68, Pesticides Monitoring J. ,
     4, No.  2, 71-86,  1970.

72.  Breidenbach, A.  W. ,  Gunnerson,  C.  G. , Kawahara, F. K. ,
     Lichtenberg, J. J.  and Green,  R. S. , Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
     Pesticides  in Major River Basins,  1957-65, Public Health Reports,
     8,2,  139-156, 1967.

73.  Eagen, R.  F. ,  Jr.  and Lewallen,  M. J. , Pesticides in Farmstead
     Water Supplies,  Paper No. 66-223 Presented at the 1966 Summer
     Meeting, American Society of Agricultural  Engineers,  Amherst,
     Massachusetts, June 27-29,  1966.

74.  Weaver,  L. , Gunnerson,  C.  G. , Breidenbach,  A. W.  and Lichtenberg,
     J. J. , Chlorinate Hydrocarbon Pesticides in Major U.  S.  River Basins,
     Public Health Reports, 8^, No.  6,  481-493, 1965.

75.  Fowler, R.  E.  L. ,  Manifestations of Cotton Field Insecticides in the
     Mississippi Delta, J.  Agr. Food Chem. ,  1, 469-473,  1953.

76.  Barthel,  W. F. ,  Hawthorne, J. C. , Ford,  J.  H. , Bolton,  G. C. ,
     McDowell,  L. L.  , Grissinger, E.  H. ,  and Parsons, D. A. , Pesticide
     Residue in Sediments  of the Lower Mississippi River and Its Tribu-
     taries,  Pesticides Monitoring J. ,  3,  No.  1, 8-35,  1969.
                                  148

-------
89,  Sparr,  B. I.,  Appleby, W.  G. , Defries, D. M. , Osmun, J. V.,
    McBride, J. M., and Foster,  G. L. , Insecticide Residues in
    Waterways from Agricultural Use, Organic Pesticides  in the
    Environment,  Advanced in Chemistry Series 60, American Chemical
    Society,  146-162, 1966.

90.  Johnston, W.  R. ,  Ittihadieh,  F. T. , Craig, K.  R. ,  and Pillsbury,
    A. F., Insecticides in Tile Drainage Effluent,  Water Resources
    Research,  3,  No.  2, 525-537, 1967.

 91.  Hindin,  E. , May,  D. S. , and Dunstan,  G.  H. ,  Distribution of
    Insecticides Sprayed by Airplane on  an Irrigated Corn Plot, Organic
    Pesticides in  the Environment,  Advances in Chemistry Series  60,
    American Chemical Society, 132-145, 1966.

92.  Hindin,  E. , May,  D. S. , and Dunstan,  G.  H. ,  Collection and
    Analysis of Synthetic Organic Pesticides from Surface and Ground
    Water, Residue Reviews,  7_, 130-156, 1964.

93.  Miller,  C. W. ,  Tomlinson,  W.  E. and Norgren, R. L. , Persistence
     and Movement of Parathion in Irrigation Waters, Pesticides Moni-
     toring J..J.,  No. 2,  47-48, 1967.

94.  Knutson, H. ,  Kadoum, A. M. ,  Hopkins, T. L.,  Swoyer, G. F. ,
     and Harvey, T.  L. ,  Insecticide Usage and Residues in  a Newly
     Developed Great Plains Irrigation District, Pesticides  Monitoring
    J., 5,  No. _!_,  17-27, 1971.

 95. Abbott,  D. C. , Harrison, R. B. ,  Tatton,  J. O'G. ,  and Thomson,
     J., Organochlorine Pesticides  in the Atmosphere, Nature,  211,
     259-261,  1966.

96. Argauer, R.  J. ,  Mason,  H. C. ,  Corley, C. ,  Higgins,  A.  H. ,  Sauls,
     J. N. , and Liljedahl, L.  A., Drift of Water-Diluted and Undiluted
     Formulations  of Malathion and Azinphosmethyl Applied by Airplane,
    Journal of Economic Entomology,  61, No.  4, 1015-1020,  1968.

97.  Bowman, M.  C. ,  Acree, F. ,  Lofgren, C. S.  and Beroza,  M. ,
     Chlorinated Insecticides:  Fate in Aqueous Suspensions Containing
    Mosquito Larvae,  Science, 168, 1480-1481,  1964.

98.  Acree, F. ,  Jr. ,  Beroza, M. ,  and Bowman, M. C. , Co-distillation
    of DDT with Water, J. Agr. Food Chem. ,  2,  No. 4, 278-280,  1963.

99.  Hartley,  G. S. ,  Evaporation of Pesticides, ACS Advances in
    Chemistry Series No. 86,  ACS,  Washington, D. C. , 115-134, 1969.
                                     149

-------
100.  Goldberg, E. D. ,  Butler,  P.,  Meier, P.,  Menzel,  D. ,  Risebrough,
      R. W. ,  and Stickel,  L. F. , Transport of DDT Residues and PCB's
      to the Marine Environment, Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in the Marine
      Environment, National Academy of Sciences,  Washington, D. C. ,
      4-5,  1971.

101.  Willis, G. H. , Parr, J.  F. ,  Papendick,  R. I.,  and Smith,  S. ,  A
      System  for Monitoring Atmospheric Concentrations of Field-Applied
      Pesticides,  Pesticides Monitoring J. , _3, No.  3,  172-176, 1969.

102.  Hamaker, J. W.  and Kulinger,  H. O. , Vapor Pressure  of Pesticides,
      Pesticides Formulations Research,  ACS  Advances  in Chemistry
      Series No. 86, ACS,  Washington, D. C. ,  39-54, 1969.

103.  Nash, R.  G. and Beall, M. L. , Jr., Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
      Insecticides Equal Root Uptake Versus Vapor  Contamination of
      Soybean Foliage, Science, 168,  1109-1111,  1970.

104.  Lloyd-Jones, C.  P., Evaporation of DDT,  Nature,  229,  65-66, 1971.

105.  Willis,  G.  H. ,  Parr, J. F. , and Smith,  S. ,  Volatilization of Soil-
      Applied DDT and DDD From  Flooded and Nonflooded Plots,  Pesticides
      Monitoring J. ,  4_,  No. 4,  204-208, 1971.

106.  Guenzi,  W.  D. ,  and Beard, W.  E. , Volatilization of Lindane and DDT
      from Soils,  Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 34, No.  3,
      443-447, 1970.

107.  Lichtenstein, E.  P., Anderson,  J.  P.,.  Fuhremann, T.  W. and
      Schulz,  K. R. , Aldrin and Dieldrin:  Loss  Under Sterile Conditions,
      Science, 159. 1110-1111, 1968.

108.  Harris,  C.  F. and Lichtenstein, E. P. ,  Factors Affecting the
      Volatilization of Insecticidal  Residues from Soils, Journal of
      Economic Entomology, 54, No.  5, 1038-1045,  1961.

109.  Bradsley, C. E. , Savage,  K.  E. and Walker,  J.  C. , Trifluralin
      Behavior in Soil: II.   Volatilization as Influenced by Concentration,
      Time, Soil Moisture Content and Placement,  Agronomy  Journal,
      6_0,  89-92, 1968.


110.  MCA, Agricultural Chemicals,  What They  Are/ How They Are  Used,
      Manufacturing Chemists'  Association, Inc., Washington, D.  C
      41, 1963.
                                    150

-------
111.  Dustman, E. H. and Stickel,  L. F. , Pesticide Residues in the
      Ecosystem, Pesticides and Their Effects on Soils and Water, Soil
      Science Society of America, Inc.,  Madison, Wisconsin,  109-121,1966.

112.  Stanley,  C. W. , Barney II, J. E. , Helton, M. R. , and Yobs, A. R. ,
      Measurement of Atmospheric Levels of Pesticides, Environmental
      Science and Technology,  5, No.  5, 430-435, 1971.

113.  Lawson, H. G. , Death in the Fields, Phosphate Pesticides Suspected
      in Poisoning of Some Farmlands, The Wall Street Journal,  July 16,
      1971.

114.  Seymour, K. G. ,  Evaluation of Spray Drift Potential,  ACS Advances
      in Chemistry Series No.  86, ACS, Washington,  D. C. , 135-154, 1969.

115.  Isler,  D. A. , Methods for Evaluating Coverage and Drop Size in
      Forest Spraying, Trans.  American Society of Agricultural Engineers,
      6, No. 3, 231-233, 1963.

116.  Isler,  D. A. and Thornton, D.  G. , Effect of Atomization on Airplane
      Spray Patterns, Agricultural Engineering,  36, No. 9, 600-601,  1955.

117.  Wilson,  J. D. , Redden, O. K. ,  and Sleesman, J. P., Spray Droplet
      Size as Related to Disease and Insect Control  on Row Crops, Ohio
      Agricultural Experiment  Station,  Wooster, Ohio,  Research Bulletin
      945, August, 1963.

118.  Weibel,  S. R. , Weidner,  R. B. ,  Cohen, J.  M.,  and  Christiansen,
      A. G. ,  Pesticides and Other Contaminants in  Rainfall and Runoff,
      Journal American Water  Works Association,  58, No.  8,  1075-1084,
      1966.

 119.  Peterle, T. J., DDT  in Antarctic Snow, Nature, 224, 620, 1969.

 120.  Risebrough,  R. W. , Huggest,  R. J. , Griffin, J. J. ,  and Goldberg,
      E. D. ,  Pesticides:  Transatlantic Movements in the Northeast Trades,
      Science, 159, 1233-1236,  1968.

 121.  Cohen,  J.  M. and Pinker ton, C. ,  Widespread Translocation of
      Pesticides by Air Transport and Rain-out,  Organic Pesticides in
      the Environment,  Advances in Chemistry Series 60, American
      Chemical Society, Washington,  D. C. ,  163-176, 1966.

 122.  Stojanovic,  B.  J. ,  Kennedy, M. V. and Shuman, F.  L. ,  Edaphic
      Aspects  of the  Disposal of Unused Pesticides, Pesticide Wastes,
      and Pesticide Containers, Present Before Section O-Agriculture,
      AAAS, Chicago, Illinois,  December 29, 1970.  (In print)
                                 151

-------
123.  Kennedy,  M. V., Stojanovic, B. J. and Shuman, F. L. ,  Chemical
      and Thermal Methods for Disposal of Pesticides, Residue Reviews,
      2_9,  89-104,  1969.

124.  Thorton, G.  F.  and Walker, B. A.,  Summary of Pesticide Use and
      Pesticide Container Disposition in Tennessee  Agriculture,  Tennessee
      Department of Agriculture Publication,  Ellington Agriculture Center,
      Nashville,  Tennessee,  1970.

125.  Strohl,  M. , Industry Developing Guidelines for Disposal of Pesticide
      Containers, Pesticide Information Bureau Bulletin,  New York,
      December 8, 1970.

126.  Georgia Water Quality Control Board, Industrial Waste Service,
      Atlanta, Georgia,  1967.

127.  Greve,  P. A. ,  Chemical Wastes in the Sea: New Forms  of Marine
      Pollution, Science, 173, 1021-1022, 1971.

128.  Melvin, J. S. ,  Report of Investigation of Fish Kill in Indian Swamp,
      Robeson County, North Carolina,  Water Quality Division,  North
      Carolina Department of Water  and Air Resources, Raleigh, North
      Carolina, June 14 and 15, 1971.

129.  Adams, B. L. ,  Report of Fish Kill Investigation on  Bear Swamp
      Creek at Bowden,  North Carolina,  Duplin County, North Carolina
      Department of Water and Air Resources, Raleigh, North  Carolina,
      1971.

130.  P. C. , To Prevent  Accidents:  Develop Awareness !  Pest Control,
      33, 14-19, 1965.

131.  Lewallen, M. J. ,  Pesticide Contamination of  a Shallow Boxed Well
      in the Southeastern Coastal Plains.  To be published in Ground Water
      Journal, 1971.

132.  Bugg, J. C. , Jr.,  Higgins,  J. E. ,  and Robertson,  E. A.,  Jr.,
      Chlorinated Pesticide Levels in the Eastern Oyster  (Crassostrea,
      Virginia) From Selected Areas of the  South Atlantic  and Gulf
      of Mexico, Pesticides Monitoring J. ,  1,, No.  3,  9-12, 1967.

133.  Carson,  R. ,  Silent Spring,  New York: Fawcett World Library,
      120-140,  1967.
                                      152

-------
134.   Shapley,  D. , Mirex and the Fire Ant:  Decline in Fortunes of "Perfect"
      Pesticide,  Science,  172,  358-360,  1971.

135.   D. S. , Fire Ant Control Under Fire,  Science,  171,  1131,  1971.

136.   Mahoney, J. J. ,  Mirex:  Pesticide or Pestilence, Newsletter, The
      Georgia  Conservancy, Inc., February, 1971.

137.   AW1C, Fish Kills on Choccolocco Creek and Coosa River, Alabama
      Water  Improvement Commission,  Montgomery, Alabama, Report,
      May, 1961.
                                         !
 138.  Georgia Game and Fish Commission, Albany District, Albany,
      Georgia, 1969.

 139.  Georgia Water Quality Control Board, Industrial Waste Service,
      Atlanta,  Georgia, 1971.

140.   Taylor,  R.  S. , Report of Investigation of Recurring Fish Kills,
      Symonds Creek,  Pasquotank County,  North Carolina Department of
      Water and Air Resources, Water Quality Division,  Raleigh,  North
      Carolina, 1971.

 141.  Melvin,  J.  S. , Report of Investigation of Fish Kills, Hyde County,
      North  Carolina, North Carolina Board of Water and Air Resources,
      Water Quality Division,  Department of Water and Air Resources,
      Raleigh, North Carolina, August 27-September  2, 1970.

 142.  Report of Fish Kill Investigation in Lake Junaluska, Haywood County,
      Water Quality Division,  Department of Water and Air Resources,
      Raleigh, North Carolina, November,  1970-March,  1971.

 143.  Environmental Protection Agency, Southeast Region,  Special Programs
      Branch,  Atlanta,  Georgia,  1971.

 144.  Tennessee  Game  and Fish Commission,  Nashville, Tennessee, 1961.

 145,  Tennessee  Game  and Fish Commission,  Nashville, Tennessee, 1962.

 146.  Tennessee  Game  and Fish Commission,  Nashville, Tennessee, 1969.

 147.   A. C., Pesticide  Safety Education, Agriculture Chemical, 22, 28-32,
      1967.

 148.   Gruenhagen, R. H. ,  Kids Will Eat Almost Anything,  Virginia Extension
      Service Review,  June, 1968.

 149.   Kirpatrick, F. S. , Safety as a Sale Function, Pest Control,  33,  22,
      1965.

                                      153

-------
150.   Geiger, G. , How to Dispose of Pesticides Safely,  Poultry Digest,
      26,  599-600. 1968.

151.   F. C. , How to Dispose of Pesticide Containers, Farm Chemicals,
      127,  18-19,  1964.
                                   154

-------
 D.  THE IMPACT OF  PESTICIDES  ON THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

                           1.  Introduction
      The use of pesticides affects a  great variety and number of
organisms.  Benefits derived from pesticides are measured by their
effectiveness in reducing populations of pest species.  Conversely,
detriment is equated to  adverse effects on nontarget species.   Because
pesticides are rarely applied in such a manner that only the target
species are exposed,  nontarget species mortality will continue to be
expected.  Liong-and short-term effects on nontarget organisms,
occurring through specific pesticidal usage in the Southeastern region,
are discussed.  The movement of pesticide residues through the aquatic
food chain is considered.  Physical,  chemical and biological synergisms
associated with pesticides in the natural environment are examined.
Finally,  the  occurrence of low-level  concentrations of pesticides in
drinking water is evaluated relative to human health.

          2.  Movement of Pesticides by Aquatic Organisms
      An aquatic organism may be exposed to pesticides through several
mechanisms: direct entry of pesticides into the habitat,  movement of
an organism into areas previously contaminated by and retaining pesticides, trans-
portation of pesticides from contaminated habitats via suspended material
or other  organism "carriers",  or a combination of these.  Uptake  of
pesticides by aquatic organisms may be direct or indirect.  Direct uptake
refers to ingestion or absorption either from direct contact with the
pesticide or from various abiotic, pesticide-contaminated attributes of
the aquatic environment.   Indirect or secondary exposure results from

-------
oral ingestion of organisms  previously contaminated by pesticides.
For example, such exposure occurs as  pesticides and their metabolites
are passed from organism to organism  in a food web.  The pesticides
                                             1,2
involved in this  process are relatively stable.

                          a.  Direct Uptake
       The distribution of pesticides in water influences the pathway of
biological uptake.  Algae, higher plants, and invertebrate and vertebrate
animals  sorb large amounts of pesticides from the water and the sediment.
The quantity accumulated by each biological  entity is dependent upon the
physiology and behavior of the organism, the chemical characteristics
of the pesticide, and the seasonal periodicity in the  quantities of pesticide
available within a given aquatic habitat.

                              (1) Plant

       Algae are the primary producers in the aquatic environment.
Grazers and higher consumer organisms depend upon algae as a food
source,  either directly or indirectly.  Therefore, any accumulation of
a toxicant by algae constitutes a potential hazard to  consumer organisms.
Axenic algal uptake of DDT has been shown to be related to specific
                                                                    A
partitioning coefficients between a species  of organism and seawater.
The need to view accumulation of pesticides  in biological material as
a partitioning mechanism has been emphasized.   This implies that an equi-
librium is  established between ambient  and internal concentration of pesticides.
Experimental measurement of the pesticide-absorbing ability of diatoms
                    6
has been performed.   In doing so,  unnaturally high concentrations of
                          4
pesticides were employed.   Erroneous estimates of uptake may be
obtained since it has been shown that high concentrations may affect the
                                 156

-------
partitioning coefficient of an organism for DDT residues in water.
Axenic  cultures of three species of phytoplankton, Syracosphaera
carterae  (a coccolithophorid),  Amphidinum carteri (a dinoflagellate),
and Thalassiosira fluviatilus (a centric diatom) were  used to determine
            4
DDT uptake.   Sixteen to 54 percent of the pesticide was removed
the media by the algal cells.  An expected value of 30 ppm (parts  per
million) DDT  residue was obtained.   This was based  on an estimate of
        5
1. 9 x 10 for a relative partitioning coefficient estimate of DDT con-
centration in whole  seawater at 15 ppt (parts per trillion).  This predicted
value was found to be within the 95 percent confidence interval of
analytical values  obtained by electron capture detection,  gas-liquid
chromatography of the phytoplankton samples.  This  report, however,
is open to criticism since it does not present the times  required for
each algal species to  attain equilibrium uptake.

    Filamentous algae are capable of accumulating very large amounts
                            8
of chlorinated hydrocarbons.   The accumulations of  Dieldrin by communities
of benthic algae dominated by Stigeoclonium subsecundumin early stages
and later by Synedra ulna, Epjthemia sorex,  Cocconeis placentula
euglypta and Nitzschia sp. , have been studied in laboratory streams.
The influence of current velocity,  light intensity and difference in algae
                                     3
community structure was considered.   Dieldrin concentrations ranging
from  0. 05 to 7. 0 ppb  (parts per billion) were maintained in the laboratory
streams of natural water for periods of 2 to 4 months.  Algal samples
were found to contain Dieldrin concentrations ranging from 0. 1 to 100
milligram per  kilogram  (mg/kg).  Algal concentrations of Dieldrin were
as much as 30, 000 times those occurring in the water.  The physical
factors  studied had little effect on Dieldrin accumulation but did, however,
exert a  strong  influence  on the  species composition of the algal communities.
                                 157

-------
This indirect influence can affect accumulation.  Communities
dominated by filamentous algae accumulated greater amounts of
Dieldrin that did those in which unicellular diatoms  were dominant.
Extensive pesticide sorption by select algal communities constitutes
contaminated food source for animals which feed on these forms.

                          (2) Invertebrates
       Daphnia magnais  a  planktonic organism and  is considered to
be among the first  animal links in the aquatic food chain. . Daphnia
concentrated DDT by a factor of 16, 000 to 23, 000-fold during exposure
                      9
to 8 ppb for 24 hours.  Uptake was principally through the carapace
and was initially rapid.  The DDT level in the living Daphnia reached
75% of its final value within one hour.
       The  direct uptake of pesticides from the sediment by shrimp
and crabs is associated with feeding habitats.  Oysters continously
pump water through their valves during respiration.  Simultaneously
extraction of food occurs.  The organisms  can in this fashion accumulate
pesticide-contaminated particles.  These are important food chain
intermediates and commercial food products.
       Organic  particulate  matter,  occurring in estuaries, is an
important food source for benthic organisms.  In areas where the bulk
of the primary production occurs through the slow bacterial-decomposition
of plant materials such as marsh grasses,  rushes and mangroves, there
 may be a release of pesticide residues to the substrate.  As this decaying
plant detritus is utilized by other microorganisms it becomes an
enriched food source.  DDT and its metabolities  in the Carmans River
                                   158

-------
                   10
marsh of New York  were found to be most abundantly associated with
particles of 250 to 1000 micron diameters.  Detritus particles of this
size are ingested by consumer organisms and, in this way, enter
diverse food webs.  The mud-dwelling fiddler crab, Uca pugnax, was
shown to concentrate DDT residues in its muscle tissues after consumption
of detrital food material from sediment.   Similarly,  polychlorinated
biphenyls, PCB, are biologically mobilized.   Aroclor 1254-contaminated
sediments from Escambia Bay, Florida, were placed in separate aquaria
containing local, uncontaminated populations of the adult pink shrimp, Penaeus
duorarum, and shore burrowing fiddler crabs,  Uca pugilator.  Both species
accumulated Aroclor 1254 in their tissues by ingesting contaminated-
sediment particles or by absorbing the leached chemical through the gills.
The amount of Aroclor 1254  in individual crabs in sandy silt sediments
averaged 80. Ot 25. 0 mg/kg (wet wt. ) while the hepatopancreas   of the
shrimp averaged 60. 0 mg/kg  (wet wt. ).  These tissue concentrations were
found to be directly related to the amount of Aroclor 1254 contained within
the sediment (61. 0 ppm, dry wt. ).   Greater concentrations of Aroclor 1254
residues were accumulated by shrimp exposed to sandy silt sediments than
from contaminated silt sediments.  This was attributed to the chemical
leaching from the sediments,  followed by direct absorption through the
gills from the aqueous phase.
       Oysters efficiently store trace amounts of pesticides.  A
study of uptake rates and retention by 4 different mollusc,  showed that
the Eastern Oyster,  Crassostrea virginica contained 26 mg/kg; the
hooked mussel, Brachidontes  recurvus,  contained 24 mg/kg; the European
oyster, Ostrea edulis contained 15 mg/kg and  the Crested  Oyster, O.
equestris, contained 23 mg/kg after exposure for 7 days to 1. 0 mg/1
  	                                    2
(mlcrograms per liter) DDT in flowing water.    The European  Oyster is
extremely sensitive to changes in trace-level concentrations of  chlorinated
hydrocarbons.  For several  years  it has been used as an estuarine

                                 159

-------
monitor organism by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries at Gulf
                 14
Breeze, Florida.    High-river stages and seasons of maximum pesticide
                                                                     14
usage in drainage basins correlate with peak residue levels in oysters.

Oysters provide a sensitive indes of the initiation, duration and extent

of chlorinated hydrocarbon pollution in an estuary.   The ability of oysters

to concentrate or eliminate residues  is dependent upon the level of

pollution,  the water temperature and the position relative to the water

flow.  DDT residues of 150 mg/kg may require 3 months or longer to

be eliminated while  residues of less than 0. 1 mg/kg  may disappear in

about two  weeks.  Fresh water mussels and crayfish are filter- and
substrate-feeders, respectively, and are capable of concentrating high
                    15
levels of pesticides.

       It can be concluded that:

       o  Daphnia, an important fish-food organism, concentrates
          DDT rapidly upon exposure to low concentrations in solution.

       o  DDT and its metabolites are  associated with organic
          detritus especially in particle sizes ranging from 250 to
          1000 microns.

       «  Detritus feeders concentrate DDT and PCB's from the
          sediment.  PCB's biologically accumulate in concentrations
          approximately equal to sediment concentrations.
       ©  Shrimp are capable of accumulating greater PCB
          concentrations from sandy silt sediments than sand
          sediments because of leaching of the compound from
          the sediments.

       e  Pesticide  monitoring of certain sedentary, filter-fee ding
          organisms is useful in assessing the degree of chlorinated
          hydrocarbon pollution in a given habitat.
                                 160

-------
                           (3)  Vertebrates


       Tests have been conducted on several freshwater fish native to


the Southeast to determine the  pathway of Endrin entry into fish.   The


mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis and the black bullhead, Ictalurus melas
                                                      * * J"~~T ' ¥, /  -I .y

demonstrated the ability of accumulate Endrin directly from solution.   '


G.  affinis  assimilated 10.48 mg/kg during 40 minutes of exposure in a


solution containing 250  ;ig/l Endrin.  The principal mode of entry into-


I.  melas was found to be via the  gill surfaces.



       The ability to  accumulate and eliminate pesticide residues has


been demonstrated to  occur in  certain freshwater and estuarine fish.


Small blue gills,  Lepomis macrochirus, and goldfish, Carassius auratus,

                                              14
were  exposed to  0. 03  mg/1 concentrations of C   -tagged DDT,  Dieldrin


and Lindane for 5 to 19  hours.  The fish were rinsed with uncontaminated


water following exposure and placed in pesticide-free aquaria.  L-indane


was eliminated from both species of fish within two days.  More than 90


percent of the Dieldrin was eliminated in the first two weeks.   Less


than 50 percent of the DDT was eliminated after  32 days.  The  DDT and


Dieldrin were shown to  be readily transferred from contaminated  to

                                            I8
uncontaminated fish in the recovery aquaria.    Similar  experiments were


performed using pinfish,  Lagodon rhomboides, and croakers, Micropogon

                                                             19
undulatus,  collected from an estuary near Pensacola,  Florida.     Each


species was exposed to  p, p' -DDT at 1. 0 mg/1 for two weeks or 0. 1 mg/1


for five weeks under dynamic test conditions.  In the latter case,  the fish


were placed in pesticide-free water  for eight additional weeks after


exposure to establish  elimination rates.  Pinfish and croakers  exposed to


0. 1 jjLgfl DDT accumulated a maximum  DDT concentration of 10,  000 to


38,000 times the aqueous concentration in two weeks.  This concentration
                                  161

-------
remained constant thereafter.  After eight weeks in pesticide free water,
pinfish lost 87 percent and the Atlantic croakers 78  percent of DDT.
There was no increase or decrease in body concentrations of the
metabolites ODD or DDE.  However, fish from the estuary usually
contained as much ODD  and DDE as DDT.  This indicates that fish
from the estuary obtained the pesticide after it had been metabolized
and passed through the food chain or that DDT was rapidly metabolized
within the  fish.
        The uptake, retention and release of organophosphates and
herbicides by fish has also  been studied.   Malathion can be directly
                                  20
absorbed by carp,  Cyprinus carpio.   Uptake from exposure to 5  mg/1
of Malathion was time dependent for a period up to four days.  Subsequently,
equilibrium conditions were established.   The equilibrium concentration
was 28 mg/1.   The greatest Malathion concentrations were found  in the
liver.   The compound degraded within a week following exposure.  Uptake
took place  primarily  through  the gills.
        The uptake  and release of the herbicide,  Simazine, by green sunfish
(Lepomis  cyanellus) were measured after exposure to contaminated
               21
water and food.   Fish absorbed Simazine  in amounts directly proportional
to the concentration in the water, i. e. , 0. 95 and 2. 29 mg/kg total
residue were measured after  three weeks exposure to 1. 0 and 3. 0 mg/1,
respectively.   Simazine  residues were eliminated  from fish after seven
days in freshwater.  Little or no Simazine  was  found in the tissues of
fish 72 hours after feeding.   The residue which was  detected, occurred
in the viscera.
       It can be concluded that fish can readily take up pesticides via
the gills.  An equilibrium is established between the body and water
concentrations. Simazine can be accumulated in higher concentrations
through direct  absorption than through contaminated food pathways.
                                 162

-------
Chlorinated hydrocarbons and organophosphates can be absorbed and
concentrated to levels much greater than that of the  aqueous phase.
DDT metabolites,  measured in fish taken from estuaries, are at much greater
concentrations than those in fish exposed to DDT within the  laboratory.
This indicates that substantial quantities are acquired from food chain
organisms.  Chlorinated hydrocarbon residues are stored, whereas,
organophosphates  are metabolized within a few weeks to a month.
Species differences reflect varying storage  ability.  For example,
pinfish stored 2.4 times as much DDT as croakers when both were
exposed to 0. 1 /ig/1 DDT.  The elimination of stored pesticides from
previously contaminated fish moving into uncontaminated waters,
renders these residues available  for uptake by uncontaminated fish.


                b.  Indirect Uptake  Through Food Chain
        Organisms may obtain pesticides directly from the  environment
 or indirectly through the foods they  consume.  Lower members of a
 food chain may accumulate these compounds and,  subsequently,  pass
 them on to consumers.

                        (1)  Plant-Animal Chain
       The primary  producers in aquatic food chains are bacteria,
phytoplankton, periphyton and aquatic macrophytes.  They can accumulate
pesticide residues.   They provide food for  herbivorous animals.  Thus,
the pesticide residues become biologically  transferred and  are magnified
as they are passed from plant to animal.
                                163

-------
        Bacteria are nutrient regenerators which serve as food for
filter-feeding aquatic organisms.  A common shallow-water marine
bacterium,  Pseudomonas piscicida, was subjected to various levels of
DDT and Malathion.   The bacterium exhibited no alterations in growth
rate or morphology when exposed to 10 mg/1 labelled DDT or 100  mg/1
of Malathion.  DDT uptake was rapid in a medium containing 1. 0 ;ig/l
(90 percent uptake in 24 hours). The DDT was found localized  in the
cell wall, whereas, the  metabolites DDD  and DDE occurred in  greater
concentration inside the cell.  An artificial food chain has been
established using  this bacterium as the primary link.  In addition,
filter-feeding oysters and pipefish represented higher consumers. - DDT
was converted to its metabolites, DDD and DDE, during progression
through this chain of organisms.  The  parent compound is less  stable
than the degradation forms.   Conversion of the parent compound to its
metabolites is significant since may explain the high levels of DDE
occurring in terminal food chain members (birds and mammals) of
natural ecosystems.  A  similar conversion with metabolite storage
could occur with other chlorinated hydrocarbons.  However, such
metabolites have not been identified, "in situ".
        Malathion  has a half-life of 55 days in water at pH 6  and four
                        2
to five days at a pH of 8.  P. piscicida maintains a high pH (9. 5) in its
surrounding microenvironment. It was proposed that Malathion was
rapidly hydrolyzed in this fashion.  Rapid degradation was checked
by allowing the bacterium to hydrolyze Malathion in phosphate-free water
for 48  hours.  After that period, the bacteria were removed and algal
cells (Chlorella sp. )were introduced.  ,An untreated Malathion  solution
served as a control.  Twenty-five percent more algal cells were noted
in the bacterially-degraded  solution than in the solution containing
Malathion alone.  The increased algal growth was considered to have
                                 164

-------
resulted from phosphate fertilization provided by the hydrolysis of Malathion.
        Other phytoplankton organisms have shown varying responses to
                          22
chlorinated hydrocarbons.     Four species,  Dunaliella tertiolecta,
Coccolithus huxleyi, Skeletonema costatum and Cyclotella nana, were
                                                 14
subjected to short-term exposures (24 hours) of C  -labelled DDT,
Dieldrin,  and Endrin in concentrations varying  from 0. 01 to 1, 000
ug/1.   Seven-day exposures  to DDT and Endrin were performed to
determine the effects on cell division.  Dunaliella  was not affected by
any of the three insecticides  in concentrations up to 1, 000 ug/1.
              14
The rate of C   (photosynthetic carbon) uptake by Skeletonema  and
Coccolithus  was reduced  by  each insecticide in concentrations above
10  jig/I.  DDT added daily at 100 ;ig/l stopped cell division in
Skeletonema but had no effect on  Coccolithus. Endrin had little effect
on  cell numbers of Skeletonema^  although the rate of growth was
slower.  Cyclotella was inhibited by all three insecticides in
concentrations above 1 jig./l.  These pesticides could affect natural
populations of food chain organisms through inhibition of cell division,
photosynthesis and growth.   Concomitantly,  this reduced food source
would be reflected in reduced consumer populations.
        The gonads of the marine phytophagus fish, Mugil cephalus, or
mullet, sampled in Florida,  have been found  to contain concentrations of
DDT  ranging from 3 to 10 mg/kg.  The bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops
truncatus, feeds extensively on mullet and might be expected to further
concentrate the pesticide.  Blubber samples of  beached,  dead dolphins
were  found to contain up to 800 mg/kg DDT confirming accumulation.
                                                          23
Whether DDT was the cause of death was not determinable.
                                  165

-------
       The transfer of persistent pesticides from plants to animals is

of importance in an ecosystem.  There may be direct toxicity to the

primary producers or indirect toxicity to consumers.  The latter occurs

as a result of feeding on producer organisms within which pesticides

have accumulated.  Either form of toxicity will reduce consumer

populations.  Eventually decomposers  convert the biological material

of higher trophic levels into inorganic  products.  These products then

become available for production of organisms.  Peraistent pesticides

could be recycled in this fashion for many years.


                     (2) Animal " Animal Chain

       Certain aquatic organisms assimilate pesticides directly from

and establish an  equilibrium concentration with the environment.  Oysters

establish equilibrium with the water concentration and eliminate body
                                                        23
concentrations of DDT when placed  in waters free of DDT.     Similar
                                                     24
observations have been recorded with freshwater fish.

       The body concentration does not decline in organisms  continuously

exposed  to chlorinated hydrocarbons once equilibrium has been established.

The organisms pass the stored pesticides on to their consumer.  The

actual quantity accumulated varies with the  pesticide.   Daphnia containing
                                                      '            24
DDT or Methoxychlor were fed to guppies to complete a food chain.

DDT was rapidly concentrated in the fish  to about 8  mg/kg in 20 days while

Methoxychlor never rose above 0. 17 mg/kg. Similar  results were

reported as a result of feeding midge larvae and  tubificid worms, containing
                                                25
accumulated Dieldrin, to the  reticulate sculphin.     Methoxychlor appears

readily degradable in certain fish.  Snails metabolize  neither  DDT  nor
                                                24
Methoxychlor but accumulate both to high levels.

       The food chain pathways and biodegradation of persistent pesticides
                                166

-------
(DDT,  DDE,  DDD, and Methoxychlor) have been studied in a model
           26
ecosystem.     Terrestial and aquatic components were involved.
Sorghum was the terrestial factor to which DDT was applied .  Food
chain pathways for the labelled pesticide in the system were:
       Sorghum—»• Estigmene larva (salt marsh  catepillar)
       Estigmene (excreta)—»-Oedogonium (alga)
       Oedogonium—)-Physa (snail)
       Estigmene (excreta)—* diatoms (4 species)
       diatoms —«-plankton (9 species)
       plankton-«-Culex (mosquito larva)
       Culex—>-Gambusia (fish)

       The fate and conversion of DDT to stable and persistent DDE
                                             14
has been assessed.  The application rate of C   -labelled DDT
corresponded to 1 pound per acre  (1 Ib/acre).  One  month after
application to Sorghum, 52 percent of the radioactivity in the snail,
58 percent of the radioactivity in the mosquito larvae, and 54 percent
of the radioactivity in the fish was DDE.  This indicated that DDT had
been metabolized to DDE.  In the fish, DDE was present  at a concent-
ration of 110,000 times  and DDT at 84, 000  times the water  concentration,
respectively.  These accumulations  by the fish occurred  in three days.
Methoxychlor was rapidly degraded with very little  reaching the fish.
However, the snail Physa, stored large amounts  indicating that it was
unable to metabolize Methoxychlor.  Biomagnification of  DDT  and its
residues, DDE and DDD, have  been substantiated in natural ecosystems,
                         27,28,29
food chains and food webs.

       The occurrence of persistent pesticides  in estuaries has been
reported.  During the period  1964 to 1966,  a total of 133  samples of
coastal oysters from South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi,
                                 167

-------
                                                         30
 Louisana and Texas were analyzed for pesticide residues.    Ninety-
 four percent of the oysters contained one or more pesticides; 89. 5 per-
 cent contained two or more; 81. 2 percent contained three or more; 63. 9
 percent contained four  or more; and 31. 9 percent contained five or more.
 The most frequently observed pesticides were DDE (123 of 131 samples),
 DDT (117 of 131  samples),  ODD (81 of 81  samples), BHC-lindane (55 of
 133  samples) and Dieldrin (54 of 115 samples).  The concentration of
 the individual  pesticides was low.   The median values ranged from
 0. 01 mg/kg for Aldrin,  Chlordane, Endrin, Heptachlor,  Heptachlor
 epoxide and Methoxychlor to 0. 08 mg/kg for Toxaphene, when  present.
 BHC-lindane had a median value of 0. 01 mg/kg. The median values for
 DDD, DDE and DDT were 0. 02 mg/kg.  Although not stated, the total
 concentration of  the combined pesticides could have been important.
 The presence of  pesticides  in the oysters correlated with spraying
 operations in areas adjacent to the estuaries.
                                                             31
       The fate of pesticides in the estuary has been assessed.
 Estuaries are the primary breeding ground and nursery areas  of many
 oceanic species.   Any  pesticide accumulated by these  species  during
 their inshore activities will subsequently be carried to the ocean.  Fish,
 e. g. , menhaden  and sardines, feed in the  estuary,  and then move offshore
 where they become  subject to predation by pelagic fish and birds.  In
 this way coastal dwellers can pass substantial concentrations of pesticides
 to higher  trophic forms of the  open ocean.
       The  movement and magnification of persistent pesticides (DDT,
DDE, and DDD) in the food  chain have been documented.  These
 studies have involved species associated with  estuarine environments.
Studies involving inland water  species have been limited and mainly
confined to the laboratory.  Quantitative information is needed on rate
of transfer and accumulation of other pesticides within food chains and
food webs in each aquatic environment,  i.e., lakes, ponds, rivers,
                      •J L*
 estuaries, and oceans.
                                    168

-------
             3.  Impact of Pesticides on Aquatic Populations




       Populations of aquatic organisms exhibit both short-and long-


term effects upon exposure to pesticides.  Short-term effects include:


immediate kills,  reduced activity, loss of equilibrium,  and paralysis.


Long-term effects include:  population resistance,  elimination of prey


or predator organisms  competitive  ability and alteration of breeding


patterns.





                         a.  Short-Term Effects



       Organomercurial fungicides  in concentrations as low as 0. 1 ug/1


have been shown to reduce photosynthesis in lake phytoplankton isolates

             33
from Florida.    Merismopedia sp. ,  Navicula sp. ,  Crucigenia sp. ,


Staurastrum sp. and Ankistrodesmus  sp.  were exposed to four different


commonly used organomercurial fungicides in concentration varying


from 0 to 50 ug/1.  Diphenylmercury was least toxic.  One ;ag/l of


Phenylmercuric acetate; Methyl mercury dicyandiamide; and N-


Methylmercuric-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydro-3,  6-methane-3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7-


hexachloropthalimide (MEMMI); caused a significant reduction in


photosynthesis  and  growth of each culture. At 50 jig/1, uptake of


inorganic carbon ceased.   The tentative proposed  drinking water quality

                                 34                L
standard for mercury is 5. 0 jig/1.     This is considerably higher than

                                            33
the 0. l^ig/1 effective  level for phytoplankton.


       The green alga, Scenedesmus  quadricaudata, has been treated


with Diuron; Carbaryl;  2, 4-D; DDT; Dieldrin; Toxaphene; and Diazinon.


Diuron and Carbaryl induced the most pronounced effects.   Dramatic


reduction in cell numbers and  biomass occurred at concentration of 0. 1 mg


Cell density was reduced  in four days after treatment with 0. 1 mg/1 of 2,


4-D.  DDT, Dieldrin  and  Toxaphene reduced cell numbers at all treatment
                                  169

-------
levels (0. 1-1. 0 mg/1) within two days of application.  Diazinon was the
only compound tested which had no effect on cell numbers,  biomass or
              35
carbon uptake.
       Four species of coastal oceanic phytoplankton, representing
four major classes  of algae, were subjected to doses of DDT ranging
from 1 to 500 ;ug/l.  Photosynthetic activity of diatoms was measured
by carbon uptake.   All species exhibited reduced carbon uptake with
exposure to less than 10 ;ig /I of DDT.  Complete uptake inhibition
                                   36
occurred at approximately 100 iig/1.
       In South Carolina,  the marine diatom, Cylindrotheca closterium,
has been exposed to the polychlorinated biphenyl, Aroclor 1242.  The
diatom absorbed and concentrated the chemical to levels 900 to 1, 000
times  that of the water.  This PCB inhibited growth at 0. 1 mg/1.
                                                                 6
Decreased levels of RNA and chlorophyll synthesis were observed.
       The herbicide, 2, 4-D,  reduced the  cell density of the  green
                               35
freshwater  alga, Scenedesmus.   The Gulf  Breeze Laboratory in
Florida measured no alteration of photosynthesis in 7 of 9 species of
unicellular, marine algae when  exposed to concentrations  of 0. 1 to
                           37
10 mg/1  of purified 2, 4-D.    In 2 of the 9, photosynthetic enhancement
was observed.  Therefore,  different algal species  respond differently
to specific pesticides.  Information is needed to determine  whether this
is a result of different environmental conditions or is a basic genetic
difference.  Even in very small  doses,  the quality and the quantity of
the basic food chain populations, (the phytoplankton) were adversely
affected by  pesticides.
       Tetrahymena pyriformis cultures have been exposed to DDT
                    38
from 0.1 to 10 mg/1.    Growth decreased with increasing concentrations
of DDT.   Populations were reduced by 13. 8 percent at 0.1 mg/1, 20. 2
percent  at 1. 0 mg/1, and 25. 7 percent at 10 mg/1.   T. pyriformis is  more
sensitive to DDT than Paramecium multimicronucleatum and P. burs aria.
                                   170

-------
The latter cilitates have been reported insensitive to 1 mg/1 DDT over
a period of seven days.  During this exposure, P.  multimicronucleatum
accumulated DDT 264 times greater than the medium concentration and
                                                               38
P.  bursaria accumulated it 964 times the medium concentration.     This
also demonstrates a wide range of DDT tolerance in ciliates.
       Information has been compiled  regarding  specific pesticides and
their respective lethal concentrations to marine invertebrates  (crab,
                   39 40
shrimp and oyster).   '    The chlorinated hydrocarbons are toxic to
fish and mollusc at concentrations as low as 0. 001  mg/1.  Organophos-
                                                                   7
phates have a pronounced effect on crustaceans at equally low levels.
Insecticides,  as  a group, are more toxic in low concentrations than
are other pest: :-.ides,  with two exceptions.   The fungicide, Delan and
an  experimental antifouling arsenical,  ET-546, are extremely toxic
to oysters at 2.1 ;ug/l.
       Mirex has a delayed effect on crabs and shrimp.  Juvenile blue
crabs and pink shrimp exhibited no  adverse symptoms during a 96-hour
                                      41
exposure to 0. 1 mg/1  technical Mirex.    These crustaceans,  however,
became paralyzed and died within 18 days.  Similar paralytic effects
                                              42
have been demonstrated in freshwater  crayfish.    Juvenile
Procambarus blandingi and P. hayi, of Louisiana and Mississippi were
exposed to 1 to 5 p.g/1  Mirex for periods varying from 6 to 144 hours.
After exposure the  organisms were transferred to  clean water and observed.
Mortality reach 100 percent within 5 days for P._ blandingi following a
144 hr.  exposure to 1 p.g/1 of Mirex.  Exposure  of P.  blandingi  to 5 >ig/l
for 6,  24, and 58 hours,  yielded 26, 50, and 98 percent mortality,
respectively, 10 days  after initial exposure.  A greater sensitivity of
Mirex  was observed in P. hayi than P. blandingi.  Delayed mortality
was apparent in all tests.
                                171

-------
       The polychlorinated biphenyl,  Aroclor 1254,  is an industrially
valuable chemical which eventually becomes a pollutant.  It merits
attention because it is similar to chlorinated hydrocarbons in its
persistence and lethality to certain aquatic organisms once it enters
waterways.  Laboratory studies in Florida have demonstrated that
                                                                42
juvenile shrimp are killed upon exposure to 5. 0 ug/1 of this PCB.
Adult shrimp taken from an estuary were found  to contain a maximum
of 2. 5 mg/kg of the PCB.  Gammarus oceanicus,  exposed to 0. 001 and
0. 01 mg/1 of the PCB for 150 hours died and were found to have severely
                    44
necrosed branchiae.
       Acute toxicity of herbicides to aquatic Crustacea is an important
consideration since they are used  in direct applications to control
aquatic weeds and  algae in lakes,  ponds and waterways.  Assessment
of the impact of herbicidal treatment on the microfauna of natural systems
has been neglected. Microcrustacea are significant in the diet of young
and adult fish in the temperate regions.  Daphnia magria was exposed to
                                               45
16 aquatic heribicides  to determine toxic levels.    Dichlone,  Molinate
and Propanil were  extremely toxic to Daphnia over the concentrations range
of 0. 014-4. 8 mg/1.  Thirty-one herbicides  have been bioassayed to
determine  toxicity  levels in microcrustacea.    Test animals  included
the scud,  Gammarus fasciatus; glass  shrimp, Palaemonetes kadiakensis;
sowbug,  Asellus brevicaudus; crayfish, Orconectes nais; daphnia, Daphnia
magna; and the seed shrimp,  Cypridopsis vidua.  Dichlone was most toxic
to these six species.   The 48 hour TL   (the concentration in water which
causes 50% of the  test population to exhibit a specific response at a given
time) ranged from  0. 025 mg/1 for  D.  magna to 3. 2 mg/1 for crayfish.
The least toxic herbicide to D.  magna was  2, 4-D.  No adverse effects
were  noted at a concentration exceeding 100 mg/1.  The first sign of
toxicity was observed as irritability or excitability.  This was followed
by loss of equilibrium and coordination,  immobilization, and death.
Toxicity patterns (immobilization  and equilibrium loss)  in natural
                                172

-------
environments would make affected species more susceptible to prey-
predator pressures.   The amphipod, Hyalella, was found to be highly
sensitive to Diquat. ? The 96-hour mean TLm value was 4. 8 ug/1.
Immature stages of aquatic insects; dragonflies damselflies, tendipedids,
mayflies, and caddisflies had variable 96-hour mean TLm values.  They
were respectively,  >  100, > 100,  >100, 33.0,  andl6.4mg/l.

        The DDT susceptibility of Daphnia magna and the seed shrimp,
Cypridopsis vidua, have been measured  in terms of  TL  .   D^ magna
—'	                                    ijU	
and the seed shrimp were completely immobilized within 48 hours by
4 and 54 jug/1 of DDT, respectively.    The TL   values for the damselfy
(Ischnura verticalis) and the  scud (G. fasciatus) were 22. 5 and 3. 6 mg/1,
respectively, in 48 hours.  The TL  for the fathead minnow, Pimephales
promelas, was 24. 6 mg/1 in 24 hours and that of the channel catfish,
Ictalurus punctatus, was 25. 8 mg/1 in 24 hours.

        It can be concluded that certain members of the arthropods
 (crustacea and immature aquatic insects) are acutely susceptible to
 chlorinated hydrocarbons and herbicides.  These organisms serve as
food organisms for other invertebrates and vertebrates (amphibians
 and fish).  Any alteration or depletion of their populations  could seriously
 affect the entire aquatic food chain.
        The most obvious short-term effect of pesticide pollution in the
natural habitat is a fish kill.  The Southeast Water Laboratory has
                                                                  49
documented agriculture runoff of pesticides  as a pollutional source.
Several instances  of  spills associated with pesticide manufacture  have
 resulted in fish kills.  In May 1961, a plant in Alabama manufacturing
 Parathion and Methyl parathion accidentally diverted untreated waste
into a small stream. 48  Fish,  turtles, and snakes,' died along a 28 mile
reach of that stream  with lesser kills occurring 90 miles downstream
                                 173

-------
 in the Coosa River.  A second kill occurred in the  same creek in March
 1966.  This was traced to the same source.  Periodic fish kills  since
 1961 in the Ashley River in South Carolina have been traced to a plant
                                           49
 manufacturing organophosphate pesticides.

        Investigations of fish kills  in Alabama are made by the  Water
 Improvements Commission and State Department of Conservation.
 In 1967,  21 fish kills were reported in the state,  4 of these  were attributed
 to agricultural insecticides.  All occurred in the  Tennessee River basin.
 in 1968,  48 fish kills were  reported.  Three were caused by agricultural
 insecticides; one in the Lower Tombigbee River  and two in the Tennessee
 River.  The  specific insecticides  and their sources were not reported.
        Information on short-term,  high-concentration exposures of
 freshwater and marine forms under dynamic test conditions is needed.
 Acute toxicity testing of fish under static conditions has been performed;
 however,  the ir-pact on microflora and microfauna have not been considered
 in detail.  Large populations of these organisms form intermediate steps
 in the food chain.   Higher aquatic forms,  e. g. ,  fish, can avoid large
 concentrations of pesticides but the sedentary or slower forms cannot.
 The latter are also more  sensitive than fish to low-level pesticide
 concentrations.  Therefore, short-term exposure may reduce or
 eliminate the food source of fish.  If so, fish population reduction or
 elimination would follow.

                        b.  Long-Term Effects
       Chronic toxicological effects  are elicited  in an organism as a
consequence of continuous or repeated exposure to low-level concentrations
of  pesticides.  The time span involved may range from weeks to years.
Chronic effects are dictated by the degree of exposure and by the  fate of
pesticide  residues within the  animal.  If the degree  of exposure is greater
than the capacity of the animal to detoxify and eliminate the residues, a
toxicity hazard exists.  This  is  particularly important when pesticide
                               174

-------
effects are additive or when residues are temporarily stored in tissues.
If the interval between exposures are insufficient to allow for complete
purging, then toxic effects become additive.  If uptake rates exceed
those of degradation and elimination, then excess fat-soluble residues
may accumulate to high levels.  Such accumulations may cause toxic
effects when fatty tissues  are mobilized.   Stored residues of a given
concentration may not produce demonstratable toxic effects in the
directly exposed animal but may induce toxic effects after being passed
and magnified at higher trophic levels.

                    (1) Population Changes
        Long-term population and  ecological changes are subtle and less
obvious than acute effects.  Causal factors may be just as subtle and
difficult to identify and assess.  Animal populations can be indirectly
affected by pesticides through reduction in food supply.  The productivity
of phytoplankton (basic food organisms) can be reduced by exposure to
very small amounts of pesticides.  Species of estuarine phytoplankton,
isolated in the Southeast,  were exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons in
4-hour  controlled tests.    Aldrin,  Chlordane,  DDT,  Dieldrin,
Heptachlor, Methoxychlor, and Toxaphene ,each at a concentration of
1.0 mg/l,reduced productivity by  70 to 94%.  Endrin,  Lindane and Mirex
reduced productivity by 28 to 64%.  Exposure of plankton to herbicides
has reduced  productivity to a highly variable  extent according to
published reports.  Certain DDT toxicity tests of marine plankton, 21<
                           32
are ecologically questionable.  The concentrations necessary to induce
significant inhibition far exceeded expected concentrations in the open
                                                                    32
ocean and exceeded by ten times the solubility of DDT (ng/l) in water.
                                175

-------
       Effects of long-term,  low-level concentrations of pesticides on
plant populations are not known.  Aquatic plants function ecologically by
producing food and oxygen and by serving as spawning areas and substrates
for other organisms.  Increased herbicide usage poses a threat to the
stability of estuarine ecosystems which support shrimp, fish and shell-
                                           52
fish.  Tests have been performed in Florida,   to  determine an aquatic
ecosystem response when rooted plants were eliminated.   Two natural
coastal ponds were used.  One was  treated with Dichlobenil and
the other served as an untreated control.  The ponds were without
tidal effects.   Physical factors such as  sunlight, air temperature,
wind speed and organism behavior were measured.  Dissolved oxygen,
pH,  nitrates, dissolved carbohydrate,  salinity and chlorophyll A were
monitored.   Gross algal primary production was determined by light-
and dark-bottle techniques.  Both pond basins  were approximately 1
meter in depth.  Bottom substrata were composed of sand and fine
organic matter.  Chemical and physical parameters of the two ponds
were similar prior to treatment. Chara vulgaris and Potamogeton
pectinatus were the dominant hydrophytes.   Dichlobenil was injected
beneath the water surface to achieve a concentration of 1. 0 mg/1. One
month after treatment, Potamogeton and 80% of the  Chara were elimi-
nated.  An intense bloom, dominated by blue green algae,  developed.
This was attributed to the release of nutrients from decomposing vascular
hydrophytes.   Four genera of filamentous algae predominated during the
bloom:  Oedogonium, Lyngbya, Oscillatoria and Spirogyra.  Three species
of zooplankton; Diaptomus dorsalis  (copepod), Keratella cochlearis (rotifer)
and Gonyaulax sp.  (dinoflagellate) also increased.   Homeostatic chemical
conditions were established by the algae during the period of maximal
herbicide effect on vascular plants.  Concentrations of phytoplankton
chlorophyll rose to 29. 3 mg/1 after herbicide application,  but fell
                                176

-------
sharply during the period of hydrophyte recovery.  Phytoplankton
produced over  90% of the dissolved oxygen during the period of rooted
plant absence but resumed a secondary role after vascular plant
recovery.  The herbicide had disappeared from the water  and hydrosoil
64 days after application.  Residues did not persist in the  organisms
                                                                    53
nor was the degradation product, 2,  6-Dichlorobenzoic acid, detected.
This study has shown that subtle ecological changes  can  occur  when
pesticides  are  introduced into the aquatic environment.  Factors
operating over the long-term could result in trophic  population
alterations.  For example,  a population change from carnivorous to
phytophagus  fish species as  terminal members could result from a
shift in the populations of lower food organisms.  Such a change would
be reflected  in increased numbers of plankton -feeding mullet, in an
 estuarine  environment.
        Crustacea are  vital food chain organisms.  Estuarine shrimp,
fish and shellfish are  commercially valuable species. However,
pesticides and other synthetic organic contaminants,  transported to
                                          7
estuarine basins,  stress these populations.   Continuous exposure of
white  shrimp,  Penaeus setiferus,  and pink shrimp,  P.  duorarum,  to
low-level concentrations of DDT (0.2 ;ag/l) caused a 100 percent
                    12
mortality in 18 days.    Shrimp exposed to 0. 12 ug/1 died within 28 days.
The largest  concentrations were found in the hepatopancreas.  Residues
found in natural populations of shrimp from Texas,  Florida and South
Carolina contained 0. 01 mg/1 of DDT and its metabolities.  Thes-e field
residue levels differ from those of laboratory exposed samples by a
factor of 10 or 20 to 1.   For example, shrimp exposed to 0. 14 >ig/l
of DDT accumulated 0. 21 mg/kg total body residue after 13 days and
0. 15 mg/kg  after 19 days.   Shrimp that died during exposure Tiad
accumulated a minimum of 0. 13 mg/kg.  Concentrations of 0. 03  ug/1 of
DDT would seriously threaten the survival of penaeid shrimp populations
                                f tt
                                 54
            12
in estuaries.    Concentrations of this magnitude have been detected
in certain areas of the Gulf coast.
                                  177

-------
       Small blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus,  live in shallow estuarine
waters.  In these areas,  they may be exposed to chronic sublethal con-
centrations of pesticides. Test crabs fed, molted and grew for 9 months
in seawater containing 0.25  jig/1 DDT.  They survived only a few days at
concentrations in excess of 0.5  ;ug/l.    This suggests that the thres-
hold of toxicity is  very critical.  Populations that can exist in estuarine
waters containing low levels of DDT may be seriously affected by a sudden,
moderate increase,  as might occur from runoff.
       In two separate chronic exposure tests,  immature oysters
(Crassostrea virginica) were first exposed to 1. 0 ug /I concentration of
DDT,  Toxaphene and  Parathion for 48 weeks.  In the second test,  the oysters
were exposed for 36 weeks to a mixture of all three of the pesticides  at
a total concentration of 3. 0 mg/1.    Relatively high levels of DDT and
Toxaphene were accumulated but only small amounts of Parathion.   The
immature  oysters grew to sexual maturity in flowing seawater in both
of the  tests.  The  weights of oysters grown in the pesticide mixture were
5% lower than control oysters.   There was no statistical difference in
the weights of oysters grown in  solutions of the  individual pesticides
and the controls.  There were histopathological damages in the kidney,
visceral ganglion, gills,  digestive tubules  and tissue beneath the gut  in
the oysters exposed to the mixture of pesticides.  A mycelial fungus  was
also present,  indicating a breakdown in the oyster's natural defense
against this parasite.  These changes were not observed in the oysters
exposed to the individual pesticides.  It can be concluded that although
oysters can survive  and grow in a low concentration mixture of pesticides,
subtle pathological changes can be induced. Such changes reduce the
ability of the organism to survive under competitive pressures.  It was
not established in  this study whether these changes were due to a
synergistic effect  of all three pesticides in combination or an additive
effect.
                                    178

-------
       Chronic exposure to sublethal concentrations of pesticides has



been shown to elicit three observably different population responses in



fish:  an adverse effect on population size and number,  no demonstratable

                             57-67

effect or an acquired resistance.    Adverse effects on populations



have been observed as changes in mortality or growth rates.  Mortality


rates among populations of fish subjected to sublethal doses of chlorinated


hydrocarbons  have been found to be proportional to the magnitude of



dose.  Dichlobenil elicited numerous concentration-related responses


                                      57
in the bluegill, Lepomis  macrochirus.     Dose-dependent mortality


has also been observed in the freshwater  sailfin molly (Poecilia



latipinna) exposed to Dieldrin.  More than half the experimental fish


survived 1. 5 and 0. 75;ug/l Dieldrin  but showed a 10% decrease in


growth after 34 weeks.  However,  0. 012 mg/1 Dieldrin killed all exposed

                         58
fish within the first week.    Similar dose-dependent mortality and


growth responses have been observed in goldfish and bluegills upon


exposure to Mirex,    and in spot fish upon exposure to Endrin.    Off-



spring of a population of sheepshead minnow,  Cyprinodon variegatus,


which survived chronic sublethal concentrations of DDT, were found to


be more sensitive to DDT and Endrin than were offspring of unexposed,


control fish.    No observable pathological changes were reported for


the continuous exposure of the spot,  Leiostomus xanthurus, to sublethal


Endrin concentrations (0.05  ;ug/l)  for 8 months.     However, these


same fish were further tested to determine whether  sublethal exposure


to Endrin had affected their  resistance to acute toxic concentrations


(0.75 and 0. 56 ug/1) of Endrin.  They were less tolerant than controls


during the first 24 hours of exposure.     A similar increased sensitivity



of response was  observed with the same fish during chronic exposure to

           62
Toxaphene.     No effects on growth  or mortality of the spot fish  were


observed when they were subjected to 10  ug/1  concentrations of


                        63
Malathion for 26 weeks.    This may be attributed to the rapid detoxifi-



cation of the organophosphate in seawater.   One week after the


termination of the chronic exposure  test,  the same fish were  subjected
                                 179

-------
to lethal concentration of Malathion.  However,  differences in mortality

rates between control and test fish were not significant.  Fish that

survived chronic toxicity testing were further stressed by placing them

under reduced salinity conditions (from 26 percent salinity to 2. 8 and

1. 5 percent).  No effects were observed between test and control fish.

       Development of resistance to chlorinated hydrocarbons, following
                                                              64
long-term exposure,  has been domonstrated by  freshwater fish.    Once

resistance is  acquired by fish,  the level remains unchanged for several
                                                              64
generations if they are reared in insecticide-free environments.

Resistance to high pesticide concentrations were first noted in mosquito-

fish, G.  affinis, localized in heavy cotton producing areas of the

Mississippi Delta.  Two thousand-fold levels of resistance have been
                            65
acquired by fish in this area.    Resistant populations of G. af finis,

Notemigonus cyrsoleucas, L. cyanellus, L. macrochirus have been
                                                          64,66-68
obtained from pond and ditch areas  in the Mississippi Delta.       These

areas bordered large cotton plantations  and are  subject to contamination
                                                        / ^  / A
by run-off,  spray drift,  and possibly, direct application.    '    Resistance

was demonstrated when the fish were exposed to the 36-hour TLm con-

centration of DDT,  Toxaphene,  Aldrin,  Dieldrin and Endrin. The fish

from the Twin Bayou area of the Delta,  as compared to control populations

taken from non-agricultural areas,  were resistant to all  test insecticides
            64
except DDT.  These fish exhibited resistance  to Endrin,  considered  to

be the most toxic insecticide to freshwater fish, at levels approximately

50-fold greater than those which would affect controls.  The fish com-

munities from which these populations have been taken are represented
                                 65
by large  numbers of a few species.   Top-level carnivores,  such as large

mouth bass  or  crappie were absent.  Blood analysis of resistant and non-

resistant strains of N. cyrsoleucas, revealed a 64-fold greater concen-

tration of Endrin in the former than in the latter.
                                 180

-------
       Population resistance is not limited to fish. ^9  Freshwater


shrimp,  P.  kadiakensis, from 3 areas of the Mississippi Delta were up


to 25 times  more resistant to 7 chlorinated hydrocarbons,  3 organo-

                                                                   7 A
phosphates  and 1 carbamate than were non-resistant control shrimp.



       Pesticide resistance and accumulation by non-target organisms


in the aquatic environment has caused community structure imbalance.


Top-level carnivores,  such as the largernouth bass,  egrets, and gar,


are absent in waters supporting pesticide-resistant populations.  Resistant


strains of the mosquitofish, G.  affinis, can tolerate a body burden of


214. 28 mg/kg after  two weeks exposure to 500 |o.g/l Endrin.  These fish


released Endrin in sufficient concentration when placed in fresh tap

                                     71
water to kill green sunfish in 15. 5 hr.   Adaptive physiological mecha-


nisms that produce  resistance  in fish and shrimp have  not been identified.


Resistance  in a species may occur via alteration of membrane permeability,


increased fat content,  or altered metabolic pathways.





                    (2)   Physiology and Reproduction


                                                                     72 73
       Organophosphate pesticides inhibit the enzyme,  cholinesterase.


This  enzyme is functional in nerve-impulse transmission and ion transport


processes.   Tests have been performed on the sheepshead minnow which


relate acute toxicity of Diazinon, Guthion,  Parathion and Phorate to in vivo


inhibition of brain cholinesterase. 72  Adult minnows were exposed to acute


doses which killed 40 to 70 percent of the fish in 24 and 48 hours, respec-


tively.  The enzymatic activity of exposed fish was compared to that of


control fish.  The number of fish killed by each organophosphate was pro-


portional to cholinesterase inhibition.  The average level of cholinesterase


inhibition in the brain of fish does  not always correlate with the percentage

                                      72  74
of fish killed by a particular pesticide.   '    Differences within and among
                                  181

-------
populations of fish indicate that cholinesterase activity of a species

fluctuates with time. ?4 Some organophosphates  increase in toxicity with

time   For example,  Parathion can be converted in the liver of certain
                                                      .  .   75
fish to the more toxic Paraoxon, thereby increasing toxicity.

        Specific physiological modes  of action by chlorinated hydrocarbons
                                                            ,  -   76
 are not known.  It has been shown that DDT impairs osmoregulation
                               77
 and active membrane transport.    These mechanisms require cholinesterse
                                                             32
 (ATPase) enzymes.  Chlorinated  hydrocarbons,  including DDE   and
      78
 PCB,    induce mixed-function oxidase enzymes.  These  enzymes are

 functional in metabolizing steroid hormones, such as estrogen and

 testosterone.  Numerous general observations on the impairment of

 motor and sensory systems by sublethal concentrations of chlorinated

 hydrocarbons have been reported.  '   '    Symptoms  indicate central

 nervous system disorders including convulsions, loss of  equilibrium,

 increased ventilation rate,  hyperactivity and hyper sensitivity to stimuli.

        Although exact mechanisms of pesticide  toxicity are unknown,

 certain structural abnormalitites in tissues and organs are associated
                                               80
 with pesticide presence.  Nimmo and Blackman,   of the Gulf Breeze

 Laboratory, have shown that exposure of pink shrimp to a sublethal

 concentration of DDT (0. 1 (J.g/1) produces blood protein effects.   Prelimi-

 nary  studies demonstrated a decrease in serum protein levels of up to 41%

 after 45 days of exposure.  Follow-up experiments are being conducted

 to determine if a "threshold" concentration is reached prior to  this

 observable  gross effect.  Blood changes have been reported for marine
                                                 81
 puffer fish,  following chronic  pesticide  exposures.    Endrin caused an

 increase in serum sodium, potassium,  calcium and cholesterol.

        Chronic exposure to chlorinated hydrocarbons induces systemic

 lesions and other structural disorders.   Gill changes in goldfish, characterised
                                   182

-------
by swollen filaments,  appeared 112 days after an initial concentration of
                                     59
1. 0 mg/1 Mirex was applied to a pond.    Chronic exposure of spot fish

to 0. 075 ug/1 Endrin for three weeks produced systemic lesions throughout

the brain,  spinal cord, liver,  kidneys and stomach.    Lesions of the

central nervous system, kidneys and stomach were attributed to primary

effects of Endrin.  It was probable that necrotic liver lesions were also

attributable to  Endrin. Loss of hepatic fat and glycogen was  considered

secondary to systemic toxicity.   The appearance of lesions offers  an
                                             C /  no
opportunity for bacterial and fungal infections.   '    Exposure of  pinfish

and spot fish to sublethal (5 (Jig/1) concentrations of the PCB,  Aroclor 1254,
                                                                    82
over a maximum of 45 days produced fungus-like lesions on the body.

These were pronounced and hemorrhagic  around the mouth.   The affected

spot fish usually ceased feeding,  became  emaciated, and developed frayed

fins  and lesions on the body.   These exposure-associated changes  could

significantly reduce long-term viability of a species.


        Dichlobenil caused karyolysis of hepatocytes and an increase in
                                                83
connective tissue stroma in the liver of bluegills.    Chronic exposure

of bluegills to  2. 4-D caused rapid shrinkage and loss of vacuolation in

parenchymal cells and a depletion of stored glycogen in the liver.    These

fish  also exhibited a reduced circulation and simultaneous depletion of

liver glycogen.  Blood stasis resulted from congestion of larger blood

vessels  in the  central nervous system,  gills,  liver and kidneys. Conges-

tion  was caused by amorphous, eosinophilic deposits of serum protein pre-

cipitates.  Histopathological damage, induced by chronic pesticide expo-

sure, may or may not be related to function of a particular tissue.  There

is inadequate knowledge in tissue-effect mechanisms of pesticide toxicity.

Until these mechanisms are resolved, the effects of pesticide-induced

histopathologies  on survival of species in the natural environment  cannot

be understood.
                                 183

-------
       Survival of a species depends on its ability, to reproduce efficiently


and maintain population size.  Pesticides  are known to interfere with


this process. 5?>       However, specific factors contributing to repro-


ductive failure and the  frequency and extent of their occurrence are not

                                                                       57
known.  These factors  can create subtle  changes in population behavior.


Exposure to 5 and 10 mg/1 of 2,  4-D for 5 months caused L. macrochirus


to spawn two weeks  later than  individuals  in pesticide-free water.


Exposure to 1000 |ig/l solutions of Dursban for a period of time sufficient


to kill 50 percent of the test population, caused  female mosquito fish,


G. affinis, to prematurely terminate gestation.     Mosquito fish abortion

                                                                66
has been induced by several chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides.


Exposure to Dieldrin in concentration of 0. 075 and 1. 5 ^g/1 for 34 weeks,

                                                                         58
caused the sailfin molly,  P. latipinna,  to  produce fewer numbers of young.


Populations of guppy,  Poecilia reticulata, showed a change in size-class


distribution after  7 months  exposure to 0. 0018,  0. 0056,  and 0. 01 mg/1 of


Dieldrin.   The greatest increase was in the number of young.  This was


attributed to decrease in  cannibalism of the young by the parent fish.



       The presence of pesticide in an estuary could adversely affect
                                                               Q C
the breeding behavior of resident Crustacea and fish populations.    In


addition, breeding and  migratory behavior of fish which spend only a


portion of their life  cycle in these fertile nursery grounds could be affected.


For example, fish may avoid pesticide contaminated water and, thereby,


be unable to reach proper spawning grounds.  Some fish in Tennessee Valley


Authority lakes moved  out of the area when 2, 4-D  was applied for the
                                 oi
control of Eurasian water milfoil.    Avoidance behavior was demonstrated

                                                            87
by the estuarine sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus).    These


were  subjected to water containing DDT,  Endrin, Dursban, 2, 4-D,


Malathion and Sevin.  Concentrations ranged from 0. 0001 to 0. 1 mg/1  for


DDT, 0. 00001 to 0. 01 mg/1 for Endrin, 0. 01 to 10 mg/1 for Dursban,  0. 01


to 1. 0 mg/1 for  Malathion, 0. 1 to 10. 0 mg/1 for Seven, and 0. 01 to 10. 0 mg/1


for 2,  4-D.  The fish avoided four (DDT,  Endrin, Dursban and 2, 4-D)


of the pesticides at the concentrations tested. They avoided neither


Malathion nor Sevin.  The fish did not appear to differentiate  between



                                  184

-------
differences in lower concentration of the same pesticide but did display


the ability to seek water free of pesticides.   Therefore, a prerequisite for


avoidance in nature would be a reasonably distinct boundary between clean


and pesticide-contaminated water and free access for migration.  Estuaries


are often characterized by conditions that create such boundaries or inter-

      87
faces.    There is evidence to suggest that DDT in estuaries may affect


the migratory mechanism of certain fish.  The greater the DDT concentra-

                                                 88
tion,  the greater the preference for  high salinity.    This could interfere


with spawning behavior since it suggests a tendency of fish exposed to pes-


ticide pollution to return seaward.



       The reproductive organs of aquatic organisms are major  storage


sites for chlorinated hydrocarbons.  '   '    The gonads of the  oyster,


Crassostrea virginica, stored approximately twice as much DDT as the

                                89
digestive tract and other organs.     The residues accumulated in such


organs could directly affect  gamete maturation and viability, cell cleavage,

                                    8 9
and vitality of the developing larvae.    Fish store chlorinated hydrocarbons

                                23
in the gonads and in the egg  yolk.    Pinfish and Atlantic croaker populations


of Pensacola Bay lose an estimated aggregate of 1/2 Ib.  of DDT and meta-

                              31
bolities during egg deposition.    The DDT concentration of speckled sea-

                                                      23
trout in some areas of the Gulf average about 8  mg/kg.    The specific


mechanisms of pesticide influence on egg development and viability of


young of aquatic Southeastern species have not been defined.



       Chlorinated hydrocarbon residues have seriously affected repro-


duction of adult water fowl.   Eggshell thinning and consequent population

                                                               90  91
decline have been attributed to chlorinated hydrocarbon residues.   '   DDE


concentrations as high as  2, 500 mg/1 have been found in the yoke portion


of eggs with the thinnest shells.   Dieldrin, PCB's  and Endrin were also


found in lesser amounts.   DDT and DDE have been included in  the diets of


mallard ducks in controlled  experiments.  Thin eggshells and  reduced


hatching success were abserved.  A nationwide  survey was conducted


to determine the  chlorinated hydrocarbon residue levels in the mallard
                                 185

-------
and the black duck. 92 Alabama recorded the highest average level of
DDE in the survey (2.17 mg/kg in wing samples).  Dieldrin,  Lindane,
and Endrin were also found in varying amounts.  Raptorial birds, such
as the herring gull, Larus argentatus.  the bald eagle, Haliaeetus
leucocephalus,  and the peregrine falcon,  Falco peregrinus, feed on birds,
rodents, mammals and fish.  Their populations are  suffering a decline
                                              93
in correlation with observed eggshell thinning.     In 1967, herring gull
                                                      93
eggs were collected from five states including Florida.    The  shell
thickness had decreased from 1947 to 1952 values while chlorinated hydro-
carbon residues had  increased.  Brown pelican eggshells from  Florida
                  94
and South Carolina   have shown significant thinning (16-17%  decrease) as
compared to pre-1947 indices and a related decline in local populations.
        Transport of  ionic calcium across membrances of the shell gland
                                                               90
in birds is an energy-requiring process dependent upon ATPase.    Inhi-
bition by DDE could account for certain concentration-effect  correlations
(DDE concentration vs. shell  thickness) obtained  for eggs of  the brown
                        90
pelican and herring gull.    DDE,  and PCB's have been found to inhibit
                    90
carbonic anhydrase.    The enzyme  is  functional in  deposition of calcium
carbonate  in the eggshell and for maintenance  of pH gradients across
membranes such as those of the shell gland.  Associated with eggshell
thinning is the problem of increased  egg eating by parents, decreased
                                              95
clutch size and increased embryonic mortality.   Unknown  is the impor-
tance of PCB's to observed reproductive failures in  species  of birds
known to accumulate  high concentrations  of these substances.
       In summary,  low level pesticide contamination of water systems
produces subtle and complex  changes of aquatic life  as a result of chronic
exposure.  Physiological changes of  individuals are  reflected as long-term
changes  in biotic community structure.  In nature, such changes usually
go unnoticed until climatic damage occurs.   For example, elimination
of species considered desirable by man.  Waters of  the Southeast are
                                   186

-------
contaminated with pesticides and the extent depends on seasonal fluctuations.



Concentrations are often greatest in estuaries during the spawning season



of certain Crustacea and fish.    The level and persistence of DDT in Gulf



estuarine fauna suggests that commercial species of shrimp may be  endan-



gered in certain sections.    Information is needed regarding ecological



alterations induced by chronic stress from pesticides  in fresh and estua-


rine waters.




                        4.  Synergcstic Effects




       Synergism occurs when the simultaneous action of separate factors,



operating together, produce effects greater than the sum of the effects  of



the separate factors.  Through synergism,  a pesticide may act with  other



pesticides or with other physical, chemical or biological factors to cause



an adverse effect at concentrations far less than the toxic  level of that



substance acting alone.  Anomalous  laboratory results and field observa-



tions suggest that many interrelationships and mechanisms of synergism


             i  •   j  56-96
remain unexplained.




                       a.  Physical Synergisms




       Temperature  and pesticides may combine in a  synergistic manner



to adversely affect aquatic organisms.   For each 10°C increase in tempera-



ture, the metabolic rate of an organism  can be expected to double.  As



temperature rises, dissolved oxygen concentration of  the water decreases.



Temperature effects  may combine with pesticide  action to increase toxicity.



In Florida it has been demonstrated  that oysters are more sensitive to



DDT and Endrin at the same concentration during the summer  than during


           89
the winter.     The reverse is  true of organophosphate compounds -which

                                                                        89
can be explained by the reduction in  the rate of hydrolysis in colder water.




       Trout and bluegill have been  exposed to the  presence  of pesticides


                         97
and varying temperature.    Increased susceptibility was  noted with  most



compounds as temperature increased.  Exceptions  were noted for bluegill



susceptibility to Lindane and Azinophosmethyl.  They  were unaffected by
                                 187

-------
                       b.   Biological Synergisms




       Mirex has been found to affect juvenile and adult crayfish



differently. 4Z  Mortality from treatment with 1 to 5 pig/I of Mirex for



6 to 144 hours increased with time and was inversly related to animal



size.  Juvenile crayfish exhibited higher mortality rates than did adult



crayfish.  Juveniles at a length of 1. 5 cm.  showed a 55 percent mortality



3 weeks  after consuming one granule of Mirex bait while adults of a



3. 0 cm length showed no mortality.  Increased toxicity to juvenile



forms over a period of time was attributed to delayed toxic  effects of



Mirex.  Juvenile forms of other crustacean species frequently display



greater mortality factors than do adult  forms.  This has been, and will

                                                                        7
continue to be, increasingly significant in the nursery areas of estuaries.



More information is needed regarding toxicity levels of specific pesti-



cides to  immature stages in the life  cycle of aquatic organisms.




       Amitrole,  Dalapon, Endothall,  Fenuron,  Dichlobenil, Dimethylamine



salt of 2, 4-D, isooctyl ester of 2,  4-DP, and the potassium salt of



Silvex at various concentrations over varying lengths of time had no



appreciable effects on hatching of fish eggs  (bluegill, green sunfish,


                                                     102
smallmouth bass, lake chub-sucker  and stone-roller).     However,



the fry were found to be more susceptible to the toxic action of some



herbicides than were fertilized eggs. Concentrations greater than 5 mg/1



of Silvex and 10 mg/1 of Fenuron reduced the number of fry  produced



from fertilized eggs.  Different formulations  of some herbicides showed



different toxicities. Endothall did not affect the fry at concentrations



of 10 and 25 mg/1.  Carp eggs have been exposed to DDT,  Chlordane,



Dieldrin, Endrin, Diazinon and Guthion at a concentration of 1. 0 mg/1.



Embryo  development was stimulated and the incubation time was reduced


by one-third.
                              188

-------
 temperature increases to 23. 8° C from 12. 7*C in the presence of Methoxychlor.


 Susceptibility decreased as the temperature increased.   This anomaly  could


 be the result of decomposition of the pesticide at higher temperatures.


 Similar experiments have been performed in Mississippi with mosquito


 fish,  golden shiner,  bluegill and green sunfish.  They were exposed to


 DDE,  Endrin,  Aldrin,  Dieldrin and Toxaphene at different seasons of the

      64
 year.    Higher tolerance levels were measured during March and April


 than during June and July.  For example, green sunfish tolerance to Endrin


 over  36 hours  declined from 575 to 160 ug/1.  Seasonal sensitivity to lethal


 concentrations of DDT and Endrin has been noted in sheepshead minnows of


 Florida.  Sensitivity to 15 mg/1 of DDT decreased during colder months,


 March to June, and increased during warmer months, August to September.

                                              no
       Salinity has been tested as a synergist.    Salinity-tolerant mos-


 quito fish, Gambusia affinis were acclimated at 0.15,  10 and 15 parts per


 thousand (ppt)  salinity.  DDT, ODD or DDE were introduced.  A salinity


 of 15 ppt reduced the amount of DDT, DDE and DDD accumulated.  DDT


 uptake was  less than either DDE or DDD.  DDT has been shown to impair


 the osmoregulatory system of the marine eel, Anguilla rostrata.     This


 effect may explain reduced DDT uptake with increased salinity.



       The fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas,  was exposed  to Endrin
                                            99
 or DDT under  static and dynamic conditions.     Comparative  48- and


 96-hour Endrin exposure indicated a  slightly higher LC5Q value during


 static as compared with dynamic tests.  The higher toxicity of Endrin


 under static conditions was not explained.  However, the sharp increase


 in toxicity of DDT  in static conditions as opposed to dynamic was attributed


 to decreasing oxygen concentrations and/or synergism with fish-produced


metabolites (e. g. ,  ammonia or CO).  Assessing toxicity  of pesticides,

                                                           99
under static test conditions, can result in significant error.    The
                                189

-------
pesticides could interact synergistically with numerous and varying
physical and chemical factors of the aquatic environment.  A greater
emphasis must be placed on dynamic bioassay testing under natural
conditions.
       Certain chemical compounds have been shown to increase the
toxicity of specific pesticides.   Copper sulfate pentahydrate (CSP) has
been applied in conjunction with Diquat to control hydrilla,  egeria
and Southern naiad.     This combined treatment yields better control
than does individual  application.  Submerged plants absorbed more
copper from pools containing both substances than from pools containing
only CSP.
       Pesticides can synergize with pH.  This could be a  result of pH
induction of hydrolysis products that are more toxic than the parent
compound.   The fathead minnow has been exposed to Malathion under
varying pH conditions.    When Malathion was introduced under high
pH conditions,  the metabolic product,  Diethyl fumarate was formed.  The
metabolite  was found to be more toxic in the presence of the parent
compound than either substance acting alone.  More information is
needed on synergisms between parent compound and degradation products.
Oysters  exposed to a mixture of 1. 0 p.g/1 each of DDT, Toxaphene and
Parathion showed less growth and developed tissue pathology.    Changes
were not evident in organisms  reared in 1.0 |ig/l of either DDT, Toxaphene
or Parathion.   The results suggest that the effects may have been caused
by a synergism among the three toxicants.
       In summary, the abiotic environment can alter the effect of a
pesticide by either increasing or decreasing biological uptake and
activity. Physical and chemical factors of the environment must be
considered in conjunction with pesticide usage.
                              190

-------
      The egg stage of an animal can be relatively resistant to pesticides.
The yolk material nourishes the developing embryo.  Oxygen and water
are obtained from the external environment.  The offspring may not be
exposed to pesticides  until  the yolk material has been depleted and/or
hatching  occurs.
      Fingerling mosquito fish have been grouped into size-class and
                                        104
exposed to 41 ppt concentrations of DDT.      The smaller fish were
more efficient in DDT uptake than were older fish within a 48-hour period.
This was attributed to increased surface area to volume ratios in the
smaller fish relative  to those  of larger fish.  This relationship may
be another factor that acts  synergis tic ally to  alter toxicological effects.
      Pesticide  synergisms with such factors as temperature,  pH,
other pesticides, and stage of biological development have been estab-
lished to species native to  the Southeast.  Synergisms,  resulting from
multiple-pesticide  usage, have not been investigated thoroughly. Static
bioassays are likely to result  in limited toxicity information that do
not recognize synergestic effects.  The results would be of little use
in predicting the effect in natural systems.  Dynamic, carefully-designed
tests  are needed.

          5.  Health Implication of Pesticide  Contaminated Water
      The routes of pesticides from the contaminated-water environment
directly to man  are limited.  Potable water is the most obvious route.
Less  obvious is the route through consumption of pesticide-contaminated
food such as crabs, shrimp, fish and waterfowl.
                               191

-------
               a.  Contamination of Potable Water Supplies
      DDT residues were found in the Tennessee and Chattachoochee
Rivers, while Dieldrin was reported in the Savannah River  during
1962.      A 1964 survey of 56 U. S. rivers revealed that 44 were  con-
taminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons in concentrations ranging
from 0.002 to more than 0. 118;ig/l.     Dieldrin occurred in 39 rivers,
DDT or DDE in 25 rivers, and Endrin  in 22 rivers.  Between 1964
and 1967 water samples were obtained from 10 selected municipal
                                                        107
water supplies and analyzed for chlorinated hydrocarbons.    Raw water
sources for these systems were either the Missouri or Missippi Rivers.
The  only sampling site located in the Southeast was at Vicksburg,  Mississippi.
Of the 41 samples obtained at this site in 1964, four were positive  for
Aldrin, 29 for DDE,  28 for DDT, 23 for Dieldrin and 34 for Endrin.  The
survey was expanded to monitor 5 additional pesticides in 1965.
Lindane was present in 4 of 6 samples, BHC in 5 of 6, Aldrin in 3  of 45,
Heptachlor in 1 of 24,  HCE in 6 of 37.  Chlordane was not detected in 6
samples.   Ingestion of at least 9 known pesticides was involved in con-
sumption of this water.
      The  Flint Creek basin of Alabama was monitored for  pesticides
                       108
between 1959 and 1962.    The entire 400 square mile basin is located
in a  predominately cotton producing area.  Flint Creek and the West
Fork of Flint Creek are the principal streams of the basin.  A water
treatment plant is located downstream from the junction of the forks and
serves  Hartselle and Flint, Alabama.  Pesticide analyses of treated and
raw water  samples at the treatment plant revealed chronic contamination
by Toxaphene and BHC. Treated water contained pesticide  concentrations
comparable to the raw water.  DDT was not found although it was used
extensively within the basin.  BHC contamination was attributed to crop
dusting in the basin.  The concentration of pesticide reaching the public
via drinking water was less than ljug/1.  Such  levels go unnoticed by the
consumer.
                                192

-------
      Five municipal wells in Florida were found to be contaminated
with 1 pg/1 of Parathion.     Canal water in the area contained Parathion
as a result of extensive agricultural use.   It was postulated that the
wells were contaminated by percolation of ground water.
      Chemical and biological evidence indicates that surface waters
of the United States are contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbon
insecticides.  In localized areas, surface waters are polluted with
herbicides.  Organic pesticides  can contribute tastes and odors  to
              110
potable water.     Several organic triphosphates and 2, 4-D produre
tastes and odors far below toxic levels.  Establishing standards for
selected pesticides  in drinking water based on taste and odor levels
could offer a margin of safety to consumers in those specific cases.
      Once pesticides reach water treatement plants, removal through
conventional coagulation and sand filtration becomes selective.     This
is attributable to variations in solubility and adsorption.  In one case,
DDT at a concentration of 10 pg/1 was  effectively removed while Lindane
and Parathion were not.  The latter was presumably a result of  greater
water  solubility.  Chlorine treatment did  oxidize Parathion to its toxic
derivative, Paraoxon.  Potassium permanganate at 1 to 5 mg/1 and
ozone  at dosages up to 38 mg/1 were ineffective. Powdered activated
charcoal was of limited effectiveness.   Lindane reduction from 10 to
1 ug/1, required 29 mg/1 carbon.  Percolation through a bed of granular
carbon was the most effective means of treatment.   More than 99 percent
of the applied DDT, Lindane, Parathion,  Dieldrin,  2,  4-D, 2, 4, 5-T  ester,
and Endrin concentrations were  removed.  Recent information indicates
that occasional high pesticide concentrations may be reduced to  acceptable
levels by standard water treatment practices.    However, chronic, low-
level concentrations are difficult to  remove by current practices.  At
present, removal of pesticides from large bodies of water is economically
unfeasible.     Therefore, long periods will be required for renovation
by natural processes.  As persistent pesticides are replaced by more
                                  193

-------
readily-degradable compounds will be facilitated.
      Increasing population growth and industrialization of the Southeast
has resulted in more intensive use of available surface waters.  Major
supplies in this  area are contaminated with persistent pesticides.
Removal of low-level concentrations is not accomplished by conventional
treatment  practice.   Hence, pesticides become available to humans in
their drinking water.  These low-level concentrations, if accumulated,
may constitute health hazards.

                  b.  Ingestion via Food  Products
      The  main  source of general population  exposure to DDT and Dieldrin
                                        114
occurs via ingestion  of residues  in food.      Residues of DDT and its
metabolites have been reported in processed fisheries products (fishmeal,
oyster, and shrimp).  These residues ranged from 0. 02 to 0. 063  mg/1.
Nine  of fifty river monitoring stations in the  United States are located in
the Southeast.     Game fish from these stations have been shown to
contain chlorinated hydrocarbons.   Channel catfish of  the St.  Lucie
canal in Florida and  largemouth  bass from the  Tombigbee River in
Alabama contained 58 mg/1 and 10 mg/1 of DDT and its metabolites,
respectively.  These levels were greater than those generally reported
for other species of fish in other locations.   Thes^ results were
obtained from whole  body samples and not exclusively from edible
portions.   Chlorinated hydrocarbons accumulate in the fatty tissues of
fish.  Once fish are processed for consumption, the pesticides generally
remain with discarded visceral  portions.  Shrimp primarily accumulate
pesticides  in the non-consumed hepatopancreas.  Oysters concentrated
pesticides  in their tissues to levels thousands of times greater than the
water concentration.   These tissues normally rid themselves of pesticides
within a short period if placed in uncontaminated water.   Where oyster-
harvests are contaminated by pesticides, they can be decontaminated prior
to marketing by placement  in clean water.
                                 194

-------
      Six of seven pesticide residue levels in domestically-processed
seafood for  the years 1964 to 1969 exceeded those of imported products.117
BHC was the exception.  Domestic fish products contained 74. 4 percent
of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues compared to 56. 1 percent for
imported varieties.  DDE was present in 66. 3 percent of the domestic
varieties at an average of 0. 49 mg/1.  It was present in 49. 1 percent
of the imported varieties at an average of 0. 06 mg/1.  Heptachlor,
Heptachlor epoxide, Aldin and Chlordane were not found in imported
shellfish products.  DDE ranked highest in terms of incidence and
averaged 0. 005 mg/1.   Forty-eight percent of the domestic  shellfish
products contained chlorinated hydrocarbon residues compared to 16. 8
percent for  imported products.  More  agricultural pesticides are used
in the United States  than in any other country.   Runoff amounts are
deposited in streams and rivers.   These are eventually deposited, in
part, into estuaries and become available to estuarine organisms.
      The effect of human ingestion of  DDT over a two-year period
                     118
has been determined.     Ninety men were divided into three groups:
one group received no DDT, another received 3. 5 mg/man/day,  and the
last received 35 mg/man/day  over the two years.   The dosages were
established  at 20 and 200 times the normal dietary intake leve] for DDT.
The highest dosage was chosen to represent one-fifth of the  smallest
amount known to cause mild,  transient sickness in man. Careful
physical examination and laboratory testing failed to establish clinical
evidence of  adverse effects.  DDT was confined to the body  fat and was
proportional to dosage.  About one year was required to establish constant
tissue storage levels of 234 to 340 mg/kg.  Tissue biopsy examination
revealed no further  increase in storage level once equilibrium was
attained.  DDT release from body fat was found to be a much slower
process than its deposition.  The storage form was DDE.
                                195

-------
      Prolonged occupational exposure of an individual to DDT  has
been reported.  A storage level of 64. 8 mg/kg of DDT  and its metabolites
                118
was established.      The individual exhibited no adverse effects.
      Autopsies -were conducted of 146 persons accidentally or violently
killed in Dade County, Florida.  These examinations included measurement
of Dieldrin storage in the adipose tissue.  A range of 0. 19  to 0.24 mg/kg
                                                                        119
was obtained when samples were grouped according to  age, race and sex.
This level was not statistically different from results obtained in other
parts of the world.  Worldwide distribution  fell into a range of 0. 15  to
                                                                    120
0.29 mg/kg.  However, a value of 0. 03 mg/kg was  reported  in India.
It was  concluded that Dieldrin storage does  not vary significantly
according to age,  race,  and sex.  This  contrasts with the significant
differences  calculated for concentrations of DDT and DDE associated with
these demographic variables in the same fat samples.
      Individuals ingesting persistent pesticides establish storage con-
centration relative to the amount ingested, i. e. , storage is proportional
to dosage.  Information  regarding the time required to  establish equilibrium
storage of DDE is not available.  Pesticide  concentrations in  excess
of storage levels are excreted in the urine.   Amounts in fresh-water fish
and marine  shellfish are below storage  levels.  Continued monitoring is
essential to maintaining low-level concentrations in the aquatic  environment
and resources derived therefrom.  Low-level exposure of healthy adults
                                              118
to certain pesticides over periods of two-years    ,  did not show obvious
hazard.  Such studies must be extended to provide a sound epedemiological
basis for defining  safe chronic exposure limits.
                                 196

-------
                           6.  Conclusions
      Aquatic vegetation can sorb large quantities of pesticides.  These
sorbed substances can be metabolically degraded or stored.  The stored
compounds may either become part of a food web or be returned  to the
sediment.  Information is not available on sorption  capacities and degra-
dation of pesticides by aquatic vegetation of the Southeast.
      Fish and filter-feeding sedentary invertebrates sorb pesticides
directly from the water.  Residue levels closely correlate with surface
water concentrations,  which relate to seasonal agricultural practices
and rainfall.
      Pesticides such as DDT, Dieldrin,  Endrin, Toxaphene,  Mirex and
BHC  are bioconcentrated. Food chain studies have been primarily focused
on DDT without regard for other stable chlorinated  hydrocarbons.
      Herbicides,  in general, are less toxic to fauna than other pesti-
cides.  This is  attributed to the fact that these compounds degrade rapidly
and do not bioconcentrate.  The affects of herbicides on nontarget aquatic
plant communities have not been specifically identified.   For example,
the reduction of consumer populations is accompanied by a shift in plant
species to hardier algae that are not  consumed by grazers.
      Considerable emphasis has been placed on testing fish for acute
toxicity.  Acute toxicity levels have been established for  several individual
specJes under laboratory conditions.  These values  serve only as  quantitative
indices of toxicity under specific conditions and do not reflect accurate
responses under varying natural environmental conditions.
      There  is a need for toxicological information  on lower life forms
obtained under dynamic test conditions.  In such studies,  continuous
flow of natural waters under  environmental conditions at the site, should
be emphasized.   Resulting information would be of greater value in
assessing the effect of contaminants such as pesticides than that obtained
under static  monospecific test conditions.
                                197

-------
      More emphasis  should be placed on the long-term (chronic)  effects
of pesticides.  Toxicological information must be developed for the
lower and intermediate aquatic organisms as well as for fish.  Population
changes in lower food chain organisms will ultimately be reflected in
the long-term stability of higher consumers.
      Quantitative data on residue transfers in fresh water and marine
food webs are not available.  There is a lack of information on the com-
plex species interrelationships of food webs.  Some forms  establish an
intake,  storage and elimination equilibrium.
      The presence of PCB compounds in Southeastern water,  its  biota
and its  sediments is widespread.   These compounds are stable,biocon-
centrate in tissues and interfere with calcium deposition in birds.   This
effect has been demonstrated with DDT.
      Pesticide synergisms with such factors as temperature,  water
hardness, and  stage of biological development have been established in
species native to the Southeast.  Synergisms, resulting from multiple
pesticide residues, have  not been investigated although many pesticides
are applied in combination to ensure control of target  species.
      Chlorinated hydrocarbon residues at microgram per  liter con-
centration are not completely removed by standard water treatment
practices.  The adverse effects of long-term, low-level, pesticide
exposure in humans is not known.
      Monitored pesticide residues in fish,  shellfish and ducks are not
directly useful in assessing quantities of pesticides reaching humans via
these foods.  Analyses are  typically made on a whole-produce basis and
not the edible portions only.
                                  198

-------
                     7.   Recommendations
1.  The Environmental Protection Agency should expand in-house and
supported monitoring activities to identify pesticides and their metabolites
in the aquatic environment (surface and ground fresh waters and estuarine).
This activity should be complemented by an expanded program of develop-
ment of improved pesticide concentration and analytical procedures.
The elimination of the masking effect of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB)
in analyses of pesticides  is a specific analytical need.
2.  The Environmental Protection Agency should expand in-house and
supported toxicological measurements of the effect of pesticides  on
aquatic flora and fauna.   Emphasis  must be given to dynamic rather
than static test procedures.   Under these conditions the simultaneous
effect of multiple contaminants and  environmental factors can be deter-
mined.
3.  Long-term (chronic)  epidimeological information should be developed
for the effect on life forms ranging  from microflora and microfauna to
man.   Programs of the National Institutes of Health should be oriented
to fill this need.
4.  The Environmental Protection Agency should sponsor the development
of water quality standards for pesticides based upon residue tolerances
of sensitive and essential members of the food web.
5.  The activities of the Working Group of Pesticides, an intergovern-
mental agency organization, should be continued and expanded if necessary
This liaison minimizes the possibility of duplication of in-house and
sponsored studies.   It provides a potentially valuable forum for input
to development of improved analytical techniques and water quality
standards.
                                199

-------
                           8.  References
1.  Hunt,  E. G. and Keith, J. O. , Pesticide Analysis in Fish and Wild-
    life, Anal. Meth. for Pest. , Plant Growth Reg. and Food Add. ,  5,
    147-189,  1967.

2.  Johnson, R. F. ,  Food Chain Studies, Bureau of Commercial
    Fisheries, Report, Gulf Breeze,  Florida,  Circ.  # 260,  9-11, 1966.

3.  Rose, F.  L. and Mclntire, C. D. , Accumulation of Dieldrin by
    Benthic Algae in Laboratory Streams, Hydro.  Biol.  3_5_(3/4), 481-
    493,  1970.

4.  Cox, J. L. , Low Ambient Level Uptake of 14C-DDT by Three Species
    of Marine Phytoplankton, Bull.  Environ. Contam. &  Toxicol. ,
    5/3), 218-221,  1970.
5.  Freed,  V.  H. ,  Global Distribution of Pesticides,  In: J.  W.  Gillett,
    (Ed. ),  The Biological Impact of Pesticides in the Environment,
    Environmental Health Science Series No.  1, Oregan State University
    Press,  1-10, 1970.

6.  Keil, J. E., Preister, L. E. and Sandifer, S.  H., Polychlorinated
    Biphenyl (Arochlor 1242):  Effects of Uptake on Growth, Nucleic Acids,
    and Chlorophyll of a Marine  Diatom, Bull.  Environ.  Contam. &:
    Toxicol.,  6(2),  156-159,  1971.

7.  Butler,  P.  A. ,  The Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticide Pollution,  In:
    J. W. Gillet (Ed.), The Biological Impact of Pesticides in the
    Environment,  Environmental Health Science Series No.  1, Oregon
    State University Press,  87-89,  1970.

8.  Hill, D.  W. and McCarty, P. L. ,  Anaerobic Degradation of Selected
    Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides,  J.  Wat.  Poll. Contr. Fed.,
    ^9(8), 1259-1277, 1967.

9-  Crosby,  D.  G.  and Tucker,  R.  K. , Accumulation of DDT by Daphnia
    magna,  Environ. Sci. & Tech. , 5_(8),  714-716,  1971

10,  Odum,  W.  E. ,  Woodwell, G. M.  and Wurster, C.  F. ,  DDT Residues
    Absorbed from Organic Detritus by Fiddler Crabs, Science  164
    576-577, 1969.

H.  Nimmo, D.  R. ,  Wilson,  P.  D. ,  Blackman, R. R. ,  and Wilson,  Jr.,
    A. J. ,  Polychlorinated Biphenyl Absorbed from Sediments by Fiddler
    Crabs and Pink Shrimp,  Nature, 231,  50-52, 1971.
                               200

-------
12.  Nimmo,  D. R. Wilson,  Jr., A. J. , and Blackman, R. R. ,
    Localization of DDT in the Body Organs of Pink and White Shrimp,
    Bull. Environ. Contam.  & Toxicol. ,    5, 333.340,  1970


13,  Butler,  P. A., Pesticides in the Marine Environment,  J.  Appl.
    EcoL,  SJSuppl. ), 253-259,  1966.

14.  Butler,  P. A., Pesticide Residues in Estuarine Mollusks, In:
    National Symposium on Estuarine Pollution,Stanford University,
    August,  1967,  Standford University Dept. of Civil Engineering,
    107-121,  August,  1967.

15. Wojtalik,  T.  A., Hall,  T. F.  and Hill, L.  O. , Monitoring Ecological
    Conditions Associated with Wide-Scale Applications  of DMA  2, 4-D to
    Aquatic  Environments,  Pesticide Monitoring J. ,  4(4), 184-190, 1971.

16.  Ferguson,  D.  E. and Goodyear, C. P. ,  The Pathway of Endrin Entry
    in Black Bullhead, Ictalurus melas, Copeia, 1967(2),  467-468, 1967.

17.  Ferguson,  D.  E. , Ludke, J. L. and Murphy,  G. G. , Dynamics of
    Endrin Uptake and Release by Resistant and Susceptible Strains of
    Mosquitofish,  Trans. Am.  Fish.  Soc. , _9_5_(4), 335-344, 1966.

18.  Gakstatter, J. H. and Weiss,  C.  M. ,  The  Elimination of DDT-C14,
    and Lindane-C   from Fish Following a Single Sublethal Exposure in
    Aquaria, Trans.  Am. Fish. Soc., 93J3), 301-306,  1967.

19. Hansen, David J. and Wilson, Alfred J. , Jr. , Residues in Fish,
    Wildlife and Estuaries,  Significance  of DDT Residues From  the
    Estuary Near  Pensacola, Florida, Pesticide Monitoring J. , 4J2),
    51-56,  1970.

20. Bender, Michael, Uptake and Retention of Malathion by the Carp,
    Progr.  Fish Cult. , 31(3),  155-159, 1969.

21.  Rodgers.  Charles A. , Uptake and Elimination of Simazine by Green
    Sunfish  (Lepomis cyanellus Raf.) , Weed Science, 18(1), 134-136,  1970.

22. Menzel, D. W. ,  Anderson,  J. , and Randtke, A. , Marine Phytoplankton
    Vary in Their Response to Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Science, 167,
    1724-1726,  1970.

23, Butler,  P. A. , Monitoring Pesticide Pollution,  BioScience,  _19(10),
    889-891, 1969.

24.  Reinbold,  K. A., Kapoor, I. P.,  Childers, W.  F. ,  Bruce,  W. N. ,
    and  Metcalf, R.  L. , Comparative  Uptake and Biodegradability of DDT
    and  Methoxychlor by Aquatic Organisms, 111. Nat. His. Surv.  Bull.,
    30(6),  405-417, 1971.

                                 201

-------
25.  Chadwick,  G.  C. and Brocksen, R. W. ,  Accumulation of Dieldrin by
     Fish and Selected Fish-Food Organisms,  J. of Wildl.  Manag. ,  33(3),
     693-700, 1969.

26.  Metcalf, R. L. ,  Sangha,  G. K. and Kapoor, I. P. ,  Model Ecosystem
     for the Evaluation of Pesticide Biodegradability and Ecological
     Magnification,  Environ. Sci.  & Tech. , 5(8), 709-716,  1971.

27.  Risebrough, R.  W. , Menzel,  D. B. ,  Marsten, Jr., D.  J. and Olcott,
     H. S. ,  DDT Residues in Pacific Sea Birds:  A Persistent Insecticide
     in Marine Food Chains Nature,  216, 589-591, 1967.

28,  Woodwell,  George M. ,  Toxic Substances and Ecological Cycles, Sci.
     Am. ,  216(3), 24-31,  1967.

29.  Woodwell,  George M. ,  Wurster, C.  F. ,  Jr.,  and Isaacson,  P. A.,
     DDT Residues in an East Coast Estuary:  A  Case of Biological Concen-
     tration of a Persistent Insecticide, Science, 156,  821-824,  1967.

30.  Bugg, Jr., J. C. ,  Higgins, J.  E.  and Robertson, E. A., Residue in
     Fish, Wildlife and Estuaries, Pesticide Monitoring J. , J_(3),  9-11,  1967.

31.  Butler,  Philip A. ,  Pesticides in the Estuary,  In: J. D.  Newsom (Ed. ),
     Symposium at Louisiana State University, 120-124,  July 19-20, 1967.

32.  Goldberg,  E.  D.  Butler,  P. ,  Meier,  P. ,  Menzel, D. ,  Risebrough,
     R. W.  and Stickel,  L. F. ,  Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in the Marine
     Environment:  A  Report Prepared by the  Panel on Monitoring Persistent
     Pesticides in the Marine  Environment of  the Committee  on Oceanography,
     National Academy of Sciences,  Wash., D. C. ,  1-21, 1971.

33.  Harriss, R. C. ,  White, D. B.  and Macfarlane,  R.  B. ,  Mercury
     Compounds Reduce Photosynthesis by Plankton,  Science, 170, 736-
     737, 1970.

34.  Anonymous, Mercury in Water Supplies,  J. A. W. W. A. , 62(5),
     285, 1970.

35.  Stadnyk, L. ,  Campbell, R. S.  and Johnson, B. T. ,  Pesticide Effect
     on Growth  and ^C Assimilation in  a Freshwater Alga,  Bull.  Environ.
     Contam. & Toxicol. , 6_(1), 1-8,  1971.

36.  Wurster,  C.  F. ,  DDT Reduces Photosynthesis by Marine Phytoplankton
     Science. 159,  1474-1475,  1968.
                                    202

-------
37.   Walsh, G.  E. ,  Keltner, Jr., J. M. ,  and Matthews,  E. ,  Effects of
     Herbicides of Marine Algae,  Bureau of Commercial  Fisheries,  Report,
     Gulf Breeze, Florida,  Circ.  #335,  10-1Z, 1969.

 38.  Cooley, N. R. ,  and Keltner,  Jr., J.  M. ,  Effects of Pesticides  on
     Estuarine Ciliates,  Bureau of Commercial Fisheries,  Report, Gulf
     Breeze,  Florida,  Circ. #335, 16-18,  1969.

 39.  Butler, Phillip A. ,  Effects of Herbicides on Estuarine Fauna, 18th
     Annual Meeting  of Southern Weed Conference,  Dallas,  Texas,  Jan
     19-21, 1965.
 40.  Pimentel,  D. ,  The Ecological Effects of Pesticides on Non-Target
     Species, Executive Office of  the President, Office of Science and
     Technology,  Washington,  D.  C. ,  Stock No. 4106-0029, 1971.

 41.  Lowe,  J.  I., Wilson,  P. D. , and Davison, R.  B. ,  Chronic Toxicity
     Studies of Oysters to DDT, Toxaphene, and Parathion, Bureau of
     Commercial Fisheries, Report, Gulf Breeze,  Florida, Circ. #335,
     20-22, 1969.

 42.  Ludke, J.  L. ,  Finley,  M. T. ,  and Lusk, C. ,  Toxicity of Mirex to
     Crayfish, Procambarus blandingi ,  Bull. Environ.  Contam.  &
     Toxicol., 6_(1),   89-96,  1971.

 43-  Duke,  T.  W. , Lowe, J. I.,  and Wilson, Jr. , A. J. ,  A Polychlorinated
     Biphenyl (Aroclor 1254) in the Water, Sediment,  and  Biota of Escambia
     Bay, Florida, Bull.  Environ. Contam. & Toxicol. , _5(2),  171-180,
     1970.

 44.  Wildish, D.  J., The Toxicity of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) in Sea
     Water  to Grammarus oceanicus, Bull. Environ. Contam.  & Toxicol. ,
     _5(3), 202-204,  1970.

 45,  Crosby,  D. G.   and Tucker,  R. K. , Toxicity of Aquatic Herbicides to
     Daphnia magna, Science,  154, 289-290,  1966.

 46.  Sanders, Herman O. , Toxicities of Some Herbicides  to Six Species of
     Freshwater Crustaceans,  J.  Wat.  Poll. Contr. Fed., 4,2(8 Pt 1),
     1544-1550,  1970.

 47-  Wilson D.  C. and Bond, C. E. ,  The Effect of the Herbicides  Diquat
     and Dichobenil (Casoron) on Pond Invertebrates, Part I, Acute
     Toxicity,  Trans. Am.  Fish.  Soc. , 98(3), 438-443,  1969.
                                 203

-------
48. Macek, K.  J. , and Sanders,  H. O. , Biological Variation in the
    Susceptibility of  Fish and Aquatic  Invertebrates to DDT, Trans.
     Am.  Fish.  Soc. , 99, 89-90, 1970.  ,

49. Nicholson,  H.  Page,  Pesticide Pollution Control,  Science, J_5£,
    871-876,  1967.

50. Water Pollution  Progress Report for the Years 1967 - 1968,  State
    of Alabama Water Improvement Commission, State Office Building,
    Montgomery, Alabama, 65-70,  1968.

51. Butler, P.  A. ,  Commercial  Fisheries Investigations,  Pesticide  -
    Wildlife Studies,  U.  S. Fish  and Wildlife Service,  1961-1962,
    Circ.  #167, 11-25, 1963.

52. Walsh, G. E. and Heitmuller, P. T. ,  Effects of Herbicide on the
    Biota and Energy Budget of a Coastal  Pond Ecosystem,  Bureau of
    Commercial Fisheries, Report, Gulf  Breeze,  Florida,  Circ. #325,
53.  7-11,  1969.

53. Walsh, G.  E. , Miller, C. W.  and Heitmuller,  P.  T. , Uptake and
    Effects of Dichlobenil in a Small Pond, Bull. Environ. Contam,
     & Toxicol. , _6J3), 279-288, 1971.  ,

54. Butler, P.  A. ,  The Significance of DDT Residues  in Estuarine
    Fauna, Miller,  M. W. and Berg,  G. G. ,   (Ed. ),   C. C.  Thomas
     Publisher,  Chemical Fallout; Current Research on Persistent
     Pesticides,  205-220, 1969.

55.  Lowe,  J. I. , Chronic Exposure of Blue Crabs, Callinectes sapidus,
    to Sublethal Concentrations of DDT, Ecology,  46,  899-900, 1965.

56.  Lowe,  J. I. , Wilson, P.  D. , Rick, J. , and Wilson, Jr. , J.  ,
     Chronic Exposure of  Oysters to DDT,  Toxaphene and Parathion,
    National Shellfisheries Association, 6l_, 71-79, 1971.

57.  Cope, O. B. , Wood,  E.  M.  and Wallen, G. H. , Some Chronic
    Effects of 2,4-D  on the Bluegill (Lepomis  macrochirus) , Trans.
     Am.  Fish.   SOc., 9911),  1-12,  1970.

58.  Lane, C. E. and Livingston, R. J. , Some Acute and Chronic
    Effects of Dieldrin on the Sailfin Molly,  Poecilia latipinna,
     Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. , 99(3), 489-495,  1970.
                                 204

-------
59.  Van Valin, C. C. ,  Andrews,  A. K. , and Eller, L. L. , Some
    Effects of Mirex on Two Warm-Water Fishes,  Trans. Am.
    Fish. Soc. , 97.1  185-196,  1968.

60.  Lowe, J.  I. , Some Effects of Endrin on Estuarine Fishes, Presented
    at the 19th Annual Conference of Southeast Association of Game &
    Fish  Commissioners, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 271-276, Oct. 10-13,  1965.

61.  Holland, H. T. ,  and Coppage, D.  L. , Sensitivity to Pesticides  in
    Three Generations of Sheepshead Minnows, Bull. Environ. &
     Contam. & Toxicol. , _5(4), 362-367,  1970.

62.  Lowe, J.  I. , Chronic Exposure of Spot, Leiostomus xanthurus, to
    Sublethal  Concentrations  of Toxaphene in Seawater, Trans. Am.
    Fish. Soc., 93(4),  396-399, 1964.

63.  Holland, H. T. ,  and Lowe, J. I. ,  Malathion: Chronic Effects on
    Estuarine Fish,  Mosquito News, _26(3),  383-385, 1966.

64.  Ferguson, D. E. ,  Culley, D. D. ,  Cotton,  W.  D. , and Dodds,  R.  P. ,
    Resistance to Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides in Three Species
    of Fresh Water Fish, BioScience _14_(11), 43-44,  1964.

65.  Ferguson, D. E. ,  The Effects of Pesticides on Fish:  Changing
    Patterns of Speciation and Distribution,  In: Gillett,  (Ed. )  J.  W. ,
    The Biological Impact of  Pesticides in the Environment,  Proceedings
    of a Symposium, Environmental Health Sciences Series No. 1,
    Dept. ,  83-86,  1970.

66.  Ferguson, D. E. ,  Gardner, D. T.  and Lindley, A. L. , Toxicity
    of Dursban to Three  Species of Fish,  Mosquito News,  26(1),
    80-82,  1966.

67.  Ludke, L. J. ,  Ferguson,  D.  E. and Burke, W. D. ,  Some Endrin
    Relationships in Resistent and Susceptible  Population of Golden
    Shinners, Notemigonus crysoleucas ,  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. ,
    97., 260-263, 1968.

68.  Ferguson, D. E. and Bingham, C.  R. ,  Endrin Resistance in the
    Yellow Bullhead, Ictalurus natalis,  Trans.  Am. Fish. Soc.,
    325-326,  1966.

69.  Ferguson,  D.  E. and Gilbert,  C. C. , Tolerances of Three Species
    of Annuran Amphibians to Five  Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insectic ides,
    J. Miss. Acad.  Sci. , 13,  135-138, 1967.
                               205

-------
70.  Naqui, Syed M. and Ferguson,  Denzel E. ,  Level s of Insecticide
     Resistance  in Fresh Water Shrimp, Palaemonetes  kadiakensis,
     Trans.  Am. Fish. Soc. ,  99, 696-699,  1970.

 71. Ferguson, D. E. ,  Ludke, L. J. , Finley, M.  T.  and Murphy,  G.  G. ,
     Insecticide  - Resistant Fishes:  A Potential Hazard to Consumers,
     J. Miss.  Acad. Sci. ,  J^,  138-140,  1967.

 72. Coppage, David L. , Enzyme Systems of Estuarine Organisms,
     Bureau of Commercial Fisheries,  Report,  Gulf Breeze, Florida,
     Circ. #325, 31-32,  1969.

 73. Weiss,  C. M. ,  Phys iological Effect or Organic Phosphorus In-
     secticides on Several Species of Fish,  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. ,
     9£,  143-152,  1961.

 74. Gibson,  J.  R. ,  Ludke, J. L. , and Ferguson,  D. E. , Sources  of
     Error in the Use of Fish Brain  Acetylchlorinesterase Activity  as
     a Monitor for Pollution, Bull. Environ. Contam. and Toxicol. ,
     4(1), 17-23, 1969.

 75. Gibson,  ^.  R.  and Ludke, J.  L. , Effect of Sesamex and Brain
     Acetylchbrinesterase Inhibition by Parathion in Fishes,  Bull.
     Environ.  Contam.  & Toxicol.

 76. Janicki,  R. H.  and Kinter, W.  B. ,  DDT: Disrupted  Osmoregulatory
     Events in the Intestine of the  Eel, Anguilla rostrata,  Adapted to
     Seawater,  Science,  173,  1146-1147, 1971.

 77. Yarbrough, J.  D. and Wells, M. R. ,  Vertebrate Insecticide
     Resistance:  The in Vitro Endrin Effect on Succinic Dehydrogenase
     Activity  on  Endrin-Resistant  and Susceptible Mosquitofish,  Bull.
      Environ. Contam. & Toxicol, 6(2), 171-176,  1971.

 78. Yap, H.  H. , Desaiah, D. ,  and  Cutkomp, L.  K. , Sensitivity of
     Fish ATPases  to Polychlorinated Biphenyls,  Nature,  233, 61-62,
     1971.

 79. Warner, R. E. , Peterson, K. K. and Borgman,  L. ,  Behavioral
     Pathology in Fish: A Quantitative Study of Sublethal Pesticide
     Toxication, J.  Appl. Ecol. , 3jsuppl),  223-248,  1966.

 80. Nimmo,  D. R.  and Blackman, R. R. ,  Shrimp Physiology,  Bureau
     of Commercial  Fisheries, Report,  Gulf Breeze,  Florida,  Circ. #335,
     29-31, 1969.                                                       "
                                206

-------
81.   Eisler,  R.  and Edmunds, P.  H. ,  Effects of Endrin on Blood and
     Tissue Chemistry of a Marine Fish,  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. ,
     95,  153-159, 1966.

 82.  Hansen, D.  J. ,  Parrish, P. R. ,  Lowe, J. I.,  Wilson, Jr., A. J. ,
     and Wilson, P. D. ,  Chronic Toxicity,  Uptake,  and Retention of
     Aroclor 1254 in Two Estuarine Fishes,  Bull. Environ.  Contam.
     & Toxicol,  6j2),  113-119,  1971.

 83.  Cope, O. B. ,  McCraren, J. P. and Eller, L.  L. ,  Effects of
     Dichlobenil in  Two  Fishpond Environments,  Weed Sci. , 17(2),
     158-165, 1969.

 84.  Cairns, J. J. and Loss,  J.  J. , Changes in Guppy Populations
     Resulting from Exposure to Dieldrin, Progr. Fish Cult. ,  28(4),
     220-226,  1966.

 85. Hansen, D. J. ,  Behavior of Estuarine Organisms, Bureau of
     Commercial Fisheries, Report, Gulf Breeze,  Florida, Giro. #335,
     23-26,  1969.

 86. Smith,  G.  E.  and Isom, B.  G. , Investigation of Effects of Large-Scale
     Applications of 2, 4-D on Aquatic  Fauna and Water Quality,  Pesticides
     Monitoring J. ,J_(3), 16-21, 1967.

 87. Hansen, D. J. , Avoidance  of Pesticides by Untrained Sheepshead
     Minnows, Trans. Am.  Fish.  Soc.,  98.(31»  426-429, 1969.

 88. Hansen, D. J. ,  Effect of Pesticides on the Salinity Preference of
     Fish. ,  Bureau of Commercial Fisheries,  Report, Gulf Breeze,
     Florida, Circ. #335, 26-28,  1969.

 89. Butler, P. A. ,  The Problem of Pesticides in Estuaries, Am.  Fish.
     Soc., Spec. Publ. #3,  110-115, 1966.

 90. Risebrough,  R. W. , Davis, J. and Anderson,  D. W.  , Effects  of
     Various Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, In: Gillett, (Ed.), J.  W. ,  The
     Biological Impact of Pesticides in the Environment, Environmental
     Health Sciences Series, No. 1, Oregon State  University Press,
     40-52,  1970.
                                  207

-------
91.  Stickel,  L.  F. ,  Organochlorine Pesticides in the Environment,
     Bur.  of Sport Fish/ and Wildl. , Fish,  and Wildl. Serv. ,  Kept.
     #119,  17-22,  1968.

 92. Heath, R.  G.  , Nationwide Residues of Organochlorine Pesticides
     in Wings of Mallards and Black Ducks,  Pesticide Monitoring J. ,
     115-123,  1969-

 93. Hickey,  J.  J. and Anderson,  D.  W. ,  Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
     and Eggshell  Changes in Rapotrial and Fish-Eating Birds,
     Science, 162, 272-273,  1968.

 94. Blus,  L.  J. ,  Measurements of Brown  Pelican Eggshells from
     Florida and South Carolina,  Bioscience, 2£,  867-869, 1970.

 95. Ratcliffe, D.  A. ,  Decrease in Eggshell Weight in Certain Birds
     of Prey, Nature, 215, 208-210,  1967.

 96. Report of Fish Kill Investigation in Lake Junaluska, Haywood County,
     Dept.  of Water and Air Resources, Water Quality Div. ,  North
     Carolina, Nov.  1970-March 197 1.

 97. Macek, K.  J. , Hutchinson, C. and Cope, O.  B, Effects of Temperature
     on the Susceptibility of Bluegills and Rainbow Trout to Selected
     Pesticides, Bull.  Environ. Contam. & Toxicol. , 4(3), 174-183,
     1969.

 98. Murphy, P. G. , Effects of Salinity on  Uptake of DDT, DDE and DDD
     by Fish, Bull. Environ.  Contam.  & Toxicol.,  5(5),  404-407, 1970.

 99. Lincer,  J.  L. , Solon, J. M. ,  and Nair, J. H. ,  DDT and Endrin
     Fish Toxicity Under Static Versus Dynamic Bioassay Conditions,
     Trans. Am. Fish.  Soc. ,  jW), 13-19,  1970.

100. Sutton, D.  L.  , Weldon,  L.  W. and Blackburn, R.  D. , Effect of
     Diquat on Uptake of Copper in Aquatic  Plants, Weed Sci. ,  18(1),
     703-707,  1970.

101. Bender,  M. E. , The Toxicity of the Hydrolysis  and Breakdown
     Products of Malathion to  the Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas,
     Rafinesque), Water Res. , Pergamon Press, _3,  571-582,  1969.

102. Hiltibran, R.  C. ,  Effects of Some Herbicides on Fertili zed Fish
     Eggs and Fry, Trans. Am. Fish Soc. , _9_6(4),  414-416, 1967.
                                208

-------
103.  Malone,  C.  R. and Blaylock, B.  G. ,  Toxicity of Insecticide
     Formulations to Carp Embryos Reared in Vitro, J.  Wildl.  Manag. ,
     3_4(2), 460-463,  1970.

104.  Murphy,  P. G. , The Effect of Size on the Uptake of DDT from
     Water by Fish, Bull. Environ. Contam. & Toxicol.,  6(1), 20-23,  1971.

105.  Breidenback, A.  W.  and Lichtenberg, J.  J. ,  DDT and Dieldrin
     in Rivers: A Report of the National Water Quality Network Science,
     141, 899-901, 1963.

106,  Weaver, L. ,  Gunnerson,  C. G. , Breidenback,  A.  W.  and
     Lichtenberg,  J. J. ,  Public Health Rep. , U. S. , 8£,  481,  1965.

107.  Schafer, M.  L. , Peeler,  J. T. ,  Gardner, W.  S. , and Campbell,  J.  E. ,
     Pesticides in Drinking Water: Waters from the Mississippi and
     Missouri Rivers,  Environ.  Sci.  & Technol. ,  3J12),  1261-1269,
     1969.

108.   Nicholson,  H. P. , Grzenda, A.  R. ,  Lauer,   G. J. ,  Cox,  W. S. ,
      Teasley, J. I. , Water Pollution by Insecticides in an Agricultural
      River and Treated Municipal Water,  Limmol. & Oceanog. ,  _9,
      310-317, 1964.

109.   Nicholson,  H. P., Pesticides:  A Current Water Quality Problem,
      Trans.  Kan.  Acad.  of Sci. , (Suppl. ), 7£(3),   39-44,  1968.

110.   Faust,  S. D. , Pollution of the Water Environment by Organic
      Pesticides,  Clin.  Pharmacol. Therap. ,_5_, 677-686,  1964.

111.   Robeck,  G.  G. Dostal,  K.  A., Cohen, J.  M. and Kreisse,  J.  S. ,
      Effectiveness of Water  Treatment Processes in Pesticide
      Removal, J. A. W.. W. A. ,  57_, 181-199, 1965.

112.   Report of the Secretary's Commission on Pesticides and Their
      Relationship to Environmental Health,  Parts  I and II, U. S. Dept.
      of Health, Education, and Welfare,  99-123,   1969.

113.   Chesters, G. , Konrad,  J.  G. , Effects of Pesticide Usage on
      Water Quality,  BioScience,  21(12),  565-569,  1971.
                                 209

-------
114.  Durham, W.  F. ,  Benefits  of Pesticides in Public Health Programs,
      In:  Proceedings of the Symposium on the Biological Impact of
      Pesticides in the Environment,  J. W. Gillett (Ed.) FDA,
      Chamblee,  Georgia, No. 409,  153-155,  1969.

115.  Butler,  P.  A., Commercial Fishery Investigations, In:  The
      Effects of Pesticides on Fish and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife
      Service,  U.  S. Dept.  of Inter. . Circ. #226,  65-77,  1965.

116.  Henderson,  Croswell,  Inglis,  Anthony and Johnson,  Wendell,  L.
      Residues in Fish,  Wildlife, and Estuaries,  Pesticide Monitoring
      J.,  5(1), 1-11, 1971.

117.  Duggan, R.  E. ,  Lipscomb, C.  Q. , Cox,  E.  L. Heatwale,  R.  E.
      and Kling,  R. C. , Residues in Food  and Feed, Pesticide
      Monitoring,  J. ,  5_(2), 73-212,  1971.

118.  Hayes, Jr.,  W. J. , Durham, W. F.  and Cueto, Jr., C. , The
      Effect of Known Repeated Oral Doses of Chlorophenothane  (DDT)
      in Man,  J. A. M. A.,  162, 890-897, 1956.

119.  Edmundson, W. F. , Davies, J. E. and Hull, W. ,  Dieldrin
      Storage  Levels in Necropsy Adipose Tissue from a South Florida
      Population,  Pesticide Monitoring J. ,  _2(2), 86-89,  1968.

120.  Dale,  W. E. ,  Copeland,  M. F.  and Hayes,  Jr. , W.  J. ,  Chlorinated
      Insecticides in the Body Fat of People in India, Bull. Wld.  Hlth.
      Org. , 33, 471-477, 1965.
                                210

-------
              E.  THE DEGRADATION OF PESTICIDES
                    IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT
                            1.  Introduction
        Surveys show that most of the surface waters of the U. S.
 contain chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides and certain herbicides.
 These pesticide residues and their degradation products are of
 particular concern because of their potential toxicity to many aquatic
 organisms.  Subsequently, they could exhibit adverse effects on man
 through his drinking water and food.  Before it is possible to
 adequately protect the aquatic system it will be necessary to assess
 the effect of current pesticide practices and to adjust efforts accordingly.
 There are gaps in the knowledge.  A large number of variables are
 associated with the fate of pesticide residues.  Many are only poorly
 defined and others  must be identified and  evaluated.
        The term "degradation" is used in a broad sense and will
 refer to any measurable chemical change in a pesticide under natural
 environmental conditions.  Degradation may be "complete degradation"
 to inorganic end-products or "partial degradation" to intermediate
                 2
 organic products.

           2.  Degradation Mechanisms,  Rates and Products
        The rates at which pesticides and  their by-products degrade
 under natural conditions are the first consideration in examining the
 effect on the aquatic environment. A compilation of 58 potentially
waterborne pesticide compounds for which degradation rates and
product information are available is presented in Table E-l.  The
great majority of these results were obtained under laboratory
conditions.  A wide variety of procedures and test conditions were
                                 211

-------
      CHEMICAL
  CLASSIFICATION
 I   IHOOGANIC

     1) Sodium ArsenUe


        Organic Arsenicals


     2) Copper Sulfate
II.   CARBOXVLIC AROHATICS

     A.  Phenoxy Herbicides

     1)  2,4-0 (Ester form
        and Na-Salt)
    2)  4-(2,4-OB)
               USAGE
To remove filamentous algae and rooted
aquatic vegetation in fish farm ponds

Used extensively 1n cotton farming as
selective post-emergence herbicides

Algae control in water
Used to control aquatic vegetation in
water systems; also broad-leafed cerea
grain crops and military defoliant
                               Aquatic weed control
                                                                                                    HERBICIDES
                                                                                                                                                         Table  E  1
        DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC CONDITIONS)
                     AND PRODUCTS
                                                                                  Increase copper uptake when   CSP applied with diquat.
1) 2,4-0 (add)  photolyzed 1i> aqueous solution under lab
   conditions  to hu»1c acK

   2.4-0 (acid)—*2,4-okhloropli
-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                          213
                                                                                   HERBICIDES  (Continued)
     CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
                                                     DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
                                                                  AND PRODUCTS
                                                                                   ACCUMULATIOM  AND/OR  LONGEVITY
 3) 3.4,5-T
 4] Silve*
 e. Pnthalic Acid
    Compounds

 1) Endothal Deri-
    vatives {Disodium
    Endotnal and TO-47)
 C. Benzole  Acid
    Compounds
 1! Aniben
   0. Pnenylacettc Acid
     1) Fenac
Used most effectively on Mod/ plant
species and such crops as nay, rice.
pasture and sugar cane
Effectively used against wody plants
and so/beans
Control of aquatic vegetation  in
fishery nabitau when water
tesperatwre > 60eF

- Also used as pree=*rgence herbicide
  to prevent weed gemination
                             Soil  sterilant used on  soybeans,
                             toaato  plants and other vegetable
                             crops
                             Used in agriculture, aquatic weed
                             control and rlgnt-of-way weed control
                              As an insecticide, noluscicide.
                              herbicide, fungicide and taciartctse.
                              Controls  tensites. --lad insects,
                              snails.   Used as weed killer,  cotton
                              defoliant and ood preservative
1) Predicted pnotodecorjr.sui!>n in aqueous solutions to Phenol
   products, sirilar to M-D
1) Pfcotodecojwsition  to Phenol  products

Z) In water and vater-sedinen:  systems, PGBE ester produced.
   P«e of P53E degradation dependent on Initial concentration
   sjt completely degraded.
1) Oecooposition of  rs-4; io«ered D.O. to sufficiently low
   concentration to  kill flsft  (-4)
   -  Higher Ca-concentra:ion tended to reduce toxidty
   -  Increased temperature - Increased toiicity

- Degradation of TO-47  ir j-jar,a is rapid in first week.  Rate
  is  direct f-r::ion of  ?ne and concentration

- Ijavdlate absorption bj plants after application.  Endothal
  anlnes  released
                                             1) (Sheets, 1963 i" Crost/. 1956) - Report rapid  photolysis
                                               by sunlight in aqueous  solutions
                                               - Pnenolic degradatior  prccucts detected

                                             ?) triben and its Hetnyl ester pnotolyzed in daylight  to
                                               dark color indicating hydrolysis and decnlorination.
                                               Products recs/ered were not identified.
                                                                         3} (Isensee, '9i9i  -  :io';gicj
                                                                            irradlatior.  •t-se'--z;.i ^r
                                                                          activity diminishes during
                                                                          *i*.ive is nore light suble.
                                               Ir-or.-jtTo-. of f«-Salt b> U¥ lignt yields ni'ture acidic
                                               sri -?.tr=; :-,-TCj-ds   Kajor identified p-jdu:t is 2,5-
                                               :':r.'.i-;se-z.,' $>-.!•-.',. 5i- and Iricnlorobenzalden/des probable
                                               -•".,r Dr;dj:-.s Vw;el«; in photolibile  (Crosby. 1966)

                                               - Irndlation :' one ir= i'- -or? sinpls constitaents of
                                                 Fenac. "crocri:--u;-5-,:.-.«-.i.; jcld


                                                       Benzyl Sltor.o' . =»r;;'J»-/i6 * O-Chlorotenzaldenyie
                                                             :.-'  ;••  - -;.-.-«ri;  jr-d  di=e"c oxidation
                                                '.r:----\:  •:<--'. s»  ;-:tj'/:'; of the la-Salt in HjO
                                                soU  contained  larger amounts
                                                                                                                                 than water; present in water and soil 64 days
                                                                                                                                 after treatment but not  In organisms.   The
                                                                                                                                 «eubo11tc 2,6-Oichorobenzok  add  never detected.

-------
      CHEMICAL
 CLASSIFICATION
IV   HETEROCrCLIC  NITROGEN
     DERIVATIVE  HERBICIDES

     A.  S-Tria2ines

     1)  Sfmazfne
 V   ALIPHATIC ORGANIC
    NITROGEN HERBICIDES

    n.  Substituted Ureas

    I)  Monuron
    2) Fenuron



    3) Oiuron

    4) Linuron



    5) Metabromuron




    9. Carbamates
                                                                                        HERBICIDES  (Continued)
                                                                                                                                                                                                           274
             USAGE
Heed control  among vegetable crops

Used Co control weeds In maize.
Also, effectively used to control
aquatic vieeds In ponds, Ukes,
and fish hatcheries.
                                  Agricultural herbicides and soil
                                  stertlants
 Agricultural  herbicide



 Soil  sterllant action

 Agricultural  herbicide



 Agricultural  herbicide
                                   Agriculture  - most  effective
                                   in preemergence application
         DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
                     AND PRODUCTS
low water solubility

II Slight degradation evidenced after 21 days
                                                                                                                                                   226
1) In river nater, pH 1.: (lab conditions), complete degradation
   in 8 weeks.  Suspected this compound would hydrolyze to Its
   amine and Dimethyl u-bamic acid.

2) One identified photo!«is, aqueous product Is 3-(4-Chloro-
   2-hydroxyphenyl)-l,l-,i|tnethylurea  (Tang and Crosby, 19S8).

1! In river water, pH 7.: (lab conditions), complete degradation
   in 8 weeks.  Suspectet hyrolysls to Its amlne and dimethyl
   carbaroic acid.

I) Partial detoxification by bacterial  organisms

After 2 months of sunligl.t, aqueous exposure, I3S 3-(3-Ch]oro-4-
nydroxyphenylH-nehtoxy-l-niethylurea,  10J 3,4-OicJiloro-phenylurea
and 2°, 3-(3,4-Oichloro(ilifnyl)-l-methylurea (Rosen,  et al, 1969)

Irradiation 1n aqueous solution for 17  days yielded - 801 original
parent composition*l5i 3-(p-hydroxyphenyl )-l-Ketho»y-l-Methylurea»
3-(p-brorr.ophenyl)-l-rseth>iurea-»p-bromophenylurea+unidentif1ed
products (Rosen and Strusi, 1968)

Refer to insecticide chart for individual compounds
 181

 216


 181

 193


 216


 216
                                                                                                                                                                  ACCUMULATION AND/OR LONGEVITY
             1) Sunflsh abiorb ammts dir
                solution concentration . Pes    lo
                Viscera - Released ifttr J t,-,, |B clan A
                     no storage                      *
iv.   MISCELLANEOUS

     i.  Herphos
        (organophosphate)
     2.  Pichloram
     3.  Oursban



     4.  Diquat
 Oefoliant
                                   Brush fciUer and aquatic
                                   herbicide
 Very similar to pichloram



 Aquatic herbicides
In river water, ph 7.3,  lab conditions,  merphos converted within
1  hour via oxidation to  GEF - 100^ conversion.  However, after
1  week, only 50% of Off  *as recovered; after 6 weeks, less
than 5'i was recovered.

           P  1C, H, i

1) Photodecoraposition ir, aqueous solution yields nonphytotoxic
   products

2) Products of phtolysis in water not isolated bj suspected hydroxyl
   replacement of chloride (Redemann, et al, 1968)
1) In aqueous solution, eft  8.0, 3,5,6-Trlchloro-pyndinol  rapidly
   degraded -All chlorires liberated - 14 products detected
   (Smith, 1968)

II At 3 am application, negligible residues were detected after
   21 ll'T- A sisn.ficJnt  portion be.ng lost after 3 days.

   - Loss may be degradation or adsorption

   - Tne majority of tire 16 cDmicals listed:  Dkhcone. I*'1";";
     Propel.  Ni-Arsen,te. Oiquat, Olchlobenil, Paraquat. «"JJ«'«j
     Amtrol* T. fndothall. Diuron, Silver Fenac. Honuron. HCM and
     J 4-0 have been found  to readily decompose in aqueous, sunlight
     solutions  (Crosby, et  al, 1965)
                                                                                                                 181

                                                                                                                 223


                                                                                                                 216
216
                                                                                                                                                               3) More persistent 'Jun M-0 or 2,i,i-t residues
                                                                                                                                                                  of 6 ppb lasted »p w 160 Ja/s after spray Into
                                                                                                                                                                  shaltow pond

-------
                                                                                                                                                                              215
                                                                         HERBICIDES  (Concluded)
   CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
USAGE
                                   DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
                                              AND PRODUCTS
ACCUMULATION  AND/OR  LONGEVITY
  5. Paraquat
                                                            3)  Very water soluble - dacocposes above pH 9- colored products

                                                               - Strongly idsor&s onti clay.  Pnotedegradable

                                                            1}  *
-------
    CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
      ^—~—      —

 CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON',

 A   Aldrln
 6.  Oieldrtn
  C.  DOT
            USAGE
                                 Used as soil  insecticide  for
                                 control of  ants,  cutworms,
                                 cjru&s,  beetles and cotton
                                 pests
Control insects which infest
vegetable and fruit crops -
general soil inhabiting pests
primary use is for termite
control
                                  Broad spectrum - cotton, soybean
                                  «(i{tl-  Jfl intermediate of DOT
                                                                           c)  DOT, COO, ODE  underwent no change in river water,  pH 7.3
                                                                               - no change in distilU-d witer
                                                                                                                   195
                                                                                             ,
                                                                                                                 (both  Molil> acridal)
                                                                               ODE
                                                                                   also detected   ireatei HOTS percentage  in eutrophic water
                                                                                                                                                    197
                                                                            f|  Uni, pH > 8, sorted Duldnn = 3,
                                                                        pH decreased
                                                                        - Uptake of Oieldrin sy seai-snt ti-a-coperii:5r.r.,
                                                                         salinity  independent                       184
                                                                                                                           b]  DOT - very perststant, -imrjlly 7 years         ]96
                                                                                                                                                             c)  Ho change  ofcer 8 weei-;
                                                                                                                                                                                                             181
                                                                                                                                                             »l  Detroit Biver a/I  percent seainenteo oils
                                                                                                                                                                DOT  concentration  near 1 FF1
                                                                                                                               d"chlorinjtn/fl  of DDT, '  ^/ e.;.liir. persu
                                                                                                                               ot  CP1 In s^dirents
                                                                                                                                                                                                            ju-

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                  217
    CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
 t   CMorcJant
USAGE
                               r dx^stic use  m a catton
                             control  of .-..:=".4i: ie pen:.
                             cotton pesti ana as a 55)j
                             stertlant

                             for ^riulurdl am -ore:,',
                             p«is   Zisrilsr usv as Cielf
                                   i..  for corn.  ie;cr.djr
                                  -r^rctil psst  control
                                        INSECTICIDES  (Continued]
                                                                          ~
                                        DEGRADATION (SPECIFIC CONDITIONS)
                                                  AND METABOLITES
                                                                 h) Anaerobic  conditions:  at 3H '

                                                                    OH- JL_iSI£S£2£5-»o?M-»Gaf-»OSP  - rat  hignly degraded product reported
                                                                        ___.
                                                                              pH 7
                                                                         or 03T-*OOE

                                                                    Jsrotic cor.diticns produo-d considerably less conversion than  anaerobic

                                                                    In «aiu -Jter sludse,

                                                                    iran'.ic cof.aitlcns:
crobidl activity predated rapid conversion



"•" C2"v6fiion j* lJ:C • tut sone cocrjuji" ji"1 •.t iscrer-;. Er.dosulfar. I and JJ,  &oth
 75 ;*r:..-» -edjct^ --;nin Me Be=- in ri ^fer «ter it pH 7.3.
Mtf-if s'ic:r:l fcfel^e.ed decoeposition product
                                                                                                                                         205
                                                 to ;r-ts-:i3rir.
                                                                               r —piT";^	* 1-K/droxychJordene

                                                                               dc-.i-if.  ,c:-.-.t: in iistilled wster, heaver, by seco
                                                                                '
                                                                                                                    ,  «astt water
                                                                                                               '5^ 99. 4 percent 1n
                                                                                                                                        206
                                                                                                                                                       ACCUMULATION  AND/OR  LONGEVITY
                                                                                                          h   Anaerobic conditions had little  effect on
                                                                                                              dissimilation
                                                                                                                                                                                                    201
                                                                                                          1)  Metabolic  fate of DDT believed dependent on exo-
                                                                                                              genous energy source
                                                                                                              - Conversions DDT * ODD in mineral media with
                                                                                                              tyrosine coraplete in 100 hours and apparently
                                                                                                              direct linear function of te^pemture             CMC

                                                                                                          j)  under biologically active^ anaerobic conditions.
                                                                                                              ODD had half-life < 1 week                       1/3
                                                                                                                                                 k)  Hate of DDT - DOD conversion Inversely related   pno
                                                                                                                                                     to Oj concentrations                             tUJ

                                                                                                                                                 1)  Decay tirce of DDT Is seven years in man, birds.
                                                                                                                                                     insects and fish                                204

                                                                                                                                                 a   After 8 weeks, no change                         181
                                                                                                           b)   Ranking in order <>f increasing persistence under
                                                                                                               anaerobic conditions.   Lindane. Heptachlor,
                                                                                                               Cndrtn, DOT, 000. Minn,  HeptatMor eporitift artd
                                                                                                               Oieldrin                                         \7£

                                                                                                           t,   uptime of Endrln by bottom sediment:  at pB range
                                                                                                               of 3 to 10.5, rapid initial uptake, decrease
                                                                                                               sharply with time •* after  7 days contact, pH > 7, « Q.
                                                                                                               Endrln sorptlon = 0                              ion

                                                                                                               At salinity U to 17 0/00,  rapid Initial uptake.
                                                                                                               after 7 days contact, Endrin = 0.  Above salinity
                                                                                                               17 0/00. no Endrln sorptfoit onto sediment

                                                                                                            J   15 percent degradation 1n 8 weeis  of other
                                                                                                               components                                       ] g]
j)  Complete t saner decomposition wUhln 6 «ee)is     181




i)  "Rapid1 deto/lf ication                            187



a)  Persisting U tophi He residues  food chain         ^gy

j)  Ctiiplete  conversion within 2 ueefcs                181

    At end of 4 weeks, vquiMtrtum  exists -  (GO
    percent)  1-HydroxycMordcne and Heptacnlor epoxide
    {40 percent) Kept^chlor epoxide r&nained stable
    for 6 weeks

c)  Anaerobic degradation products  rore  persistent
    tnan Initial Heptdchlor.  Product persisted  In
    Liolcglcally anaerobic conditions 42 days, but
    cn^lot^ly degraded  after 266 
-------
     CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
     Telcdrin
     Toxaphene
 K    v-Benzene Hexachlorid

      also, lindane
      Hirex
                                 Agricultural
                                 For control of grasshoppers,
                                 soil pests and pests which
                                 attack forage crops, cotton,
                                 soybeans and livestock
                                 ectoparasites
Wide use for control of cotton
Insects and rice stem borer.
Also use on wood infesting
pests.
                                                                                         INSECTICIDES  (Continued)
                                                                                                                                                                                                           218
                                                         DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
                                                                    AND  METABOLITES
                                F1re ant contra]
                                                                    l-Hydro«ycMordene  + Unidentified Product

                                                                 7-*- 1-hydroxychlordene   Het|bo)   *  1-Keto-Chlordene

                                               Photoheptachlor-Ketoiie ^	.   hY  	    *	.	
                                                                     H'hotol sonen za ti on

                                           In river water, pH 7,3. 75 peicent alteration  in one week  and 90
                                           percent after  two weeks
                                           -  Same results  m distilled wter
                                                                                                                                                     205
a}  In river water,  pH  7.3, no BHC degradation

b)  Anaerobic degradation in -hick sludge  at  35'C,  Lower Lindane
    concentration 95 percent m 2  days.
    - Rate depends on lindane and  sludge concentration
    - Anaerobic degradation temperature  sensitive, at 35*C, rate of
      Q.3ug/day/mi. At 20SC, very little degradation.

    Under aerobic conditions -nth  dilute sludge at 20°€, daily small
    doses of Ufldane for 57 d.iys,  had *  8  percent degradation after
    117 days.  Unidentified product produced  which persisted for 42
    days but completely remold within 266 days in thick 35'C anaerobic
    sludge.

:)  At pH 11.5 in aqueous sohtion, 98.5 percent Lindane removed in 6.5
    hours.  The first degradation  product  present only few hours, replaced
    by second decomposition p-oduct which  eventually disappeared.           206

    Lindane, httle, if any, degraded by microbial activity in an aerobic
    environment.   1, 2, 4-tn;hlorobene, reported in Okey and Bogan and
    Me teal f, as an alkaline d»chloHnation product of Lindane, was also
    resistant to metabolic ImcrobialJ attack.
                                                                                                                                                                    ACCUMULATION AND/OR  LONGEVITY
                                                                           f)  Under anaerobic conditions, volatilization  of degradation products,
                                                                               produced in aqueous environment, accounted  for  loss of 83.2 percent
                                                                               of rBHC.  Half-life calculated at 16 days.  Biological mechanisos
                                                                               responsible for isowrfzation 16.1 percent degradation at end of
                                                                               2,100 hours   Under aerob.c conditions,  identifiable degradation
                                                                               products were:

                                                                               The a-isomer of rBHC and s-BHC

                                                                               In anaerobic conditions:  «-BHC and 6-BHC but no 6-8HC.                 203

                                                                          9)   in sea water,  the .. s anl , isonars  decay at different  rates, a being
                                                                               the slowest (35 percent in 31 days).  Chemical  degradatioj  rather than
                                                                               biological.

                                                                          No degradation  biologically (fish).  Chemically (in ponds) after 284 days.
                                                                                                                                                              At end of 4 weeks completely decomposed rather than
                                                                                                                                                              chemically converted  t« a aafamt
                                                                                                                             a)  In a lake environment, tonphene «ert1cally
                                                                                                                                 transported 5 to 15 a In sedloent - sorption
                                                                                                                                 Irreversible.  Decreased fron aailna concen-
                                                                                                                                 tration by factor of 2 every 4 ninths
                                                                                                                                                                             17
b)  Contrary to Veith in* Lee  (1971), desorption of
    toNjfane from sedJoents pnxtoces yearly fluctua-
    tions of ug/i in toxaphene concentration in the
    water.  Aquatic plants significantly concentrate
    toiaphene in large amounts                     *p

a   No degradation after 8 weeks                   ]£

i)  Half-life in anaerobic ntcrotifatly active sludge
    was 1 day; half-life in anaerobic non-aicrobially
    active sludge was •• 170 days
                                                                                                                                                              d)  lindane adsorption ento  l«ke sedi«ents affected by
                                                                                                                                                                 sedlnent suspension concentration, organic natter
                                                                                                                                                                 content, lindane concentration, clay content and
                                                                                                                                                                 lindane to sediment ratio.                    20!
                                                                                                                                Half-life of •
                                                                                                                                with fisn
                                                                                                                                                                                1* hours «hen tested in aquaria
                                                                                                                                                                                                             208
                                                                                                                             Stored swples  of reaction nutare5ho.ed«ns,«r4ble
                                                                                                                             ,-8HC concentration after 12 nonths it »0 l         e\l.


                                                                                                                            High residuahty, after M da/5 «g  ''"" Mnae  ,„
                                                                                                                            in residues in rod,  i«ttr and .esetation           £|.,

                                                                                                                            Residues up to 200 pp. found 1. ?eld"
                                                                                                                            after exposure to I  ppo for I day

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                     219
8  Uodrln

C  Olazon
i.   MalatMon
                            llat as larvtclde for nosqulto
                            control .'.  direct spray entry
                            Into water

                            Also, to control peach pests and
                            other fruit and vegetable pests
Agricultural

Effective against nany frjtt
an) vegetable pests
Agr1 cultural

Used  to contra) certain pests
of fruits, vegetables anil oma-
wlals.  Also used for public
oosqulto control.
                                                                              INSECTICIDES  (Continued]
                                                                                                        •
                                                                               DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
                                                                                           AND  METABOLITES
The oeneral  rule for hydrolysli In distilled H20 is the Increase 1n rate
with decrease In sulfur content of the organophospate ester.

>)  In river water, pH 7.3, Parathlon and Methyl  parathlon

                ».p-Nltrophenol

                kDlethyl  and DlKthyl-o-thlo-phosphoric add

    In distilled HjO. no Chang? In compound, suggesting a biological
    degradation

b)  In sterilized sedteent systecs, adsorbed and  in  solution

                           Dlethylthlophosphoric add

                          kp-wttrophenol

    -  In natural sedinent, only  parathlon is solution was hydrolyzed.
      Rate of hydrolysis 0.15 to 0.18 percent/day.   Catalyzed at pH >  7.



      In anaerobic, alcroMal environment:

         ParatMcn-*- Adinopa'athlon,  stable for 150 days

      In aerobic, mlcrobla) en»lroneent:

         Piratnion—»> Aninoparathlon t x-con;ound (w/fienzeno1d and
                    Phosphoric Acid Eoietles)
                                                                  d)  At si 6.6  to 7.3. Paratniw present  1n water (D.01 ppb),  4 months
                                                                     »'te- last application


                                                                  ej  After 6 weeU In jq-ccjj  robtion, 32.2 percent degraded  (ph  6-0)

                                                                  f)  W/S_5u£trHs. - under aerctic ccrd'ttons
                                                                     - Una&le ta  oxidized neth^l parathlon but  forr.sd amlnofflethylparathlon,
                                                                       dlEethylthiophosphorlc  icld and aalnodesnethyl parathlon.   The
                                                                       anlnc-f&nj MS the rain prcCuct.
                                                                     - W/B subtil is - anaerobically. only *n1np*fora produced.
i)  H/drolysis 1s acii-caulyjM, resistant to chenical hydrolysis

l)  Hydrolysis 15 ic1d  or base catalyzed, foros 2-1sopropyi-4-oethyl-6-
    hydro«yp/r1n1d1n«.  *h|ch 1s srlcroblally degradable
    •  Resistant to cherrtca! hx^rolysls

:)  95 percent degraded after 5 «wks. Is distilled H20,  pH 6.0

D  a/Bacillus subtnis - aerobic degradation
                                                                      UHh aeration alone. SS percent hydrolyzed In 24 hours

                                                                  J)  £a;1ly hydrolyzed  \n .ater above pH 7.0
                                                                        Sane  test run In distilled «jter. no hydrolysis
                                                                                                               211
                                                                                                               180
180
                                                                                                                                           180

                                                                                                                                           211
                                                                                                                                           180
                                                                                                                                           182
                                                                                                                                           181
                                                                                                                             ACCUMULATION AND/OR  LONGEVITY
                                                                                                                       a)  Less than 5 percent Parathlon  compound  remained
                                                                                                                           after fourth week                                ]81

                                                                                                                           10 percent Methyl  paratMon remained by 2 weeks,
                                                                                                                           0 percent by fourth week
                                                                                                                                                    b)   In  sediment (from lake with pH 4.7), solutions
                                                                                                                                                        26  percent degraded 1n 92 days                   Ifi

                                                                                                                                                        In  sedlwnt (from lake with pH T.Z). solutions
                                                                                                                                                        28  to 39 percent degraded 1n 54 days

                                                                                                                                                        •.  w/o nlcroblal activity, Parathlon would persist
                                                                                                                                                        for months, while 1n biologically active (anaerobic
                                                                                                                                                        or  aerobic) environments, persist only few weeks
                                                                                                                                                    c)   50 percent hydrolyzed 1n water in 120 days       212
                                                                                                                       d)  Parathlon stable indefinitely tn  neutral  and  acid
                                                                                                                           solutions at room temperature at  pH >  9,  and  tem-
                                                                                                                           perature Increase - considerable  hydrolysis

                                                                                                                       e)  Host persistent of the organo phosphates          211
                                                                                                                                                    I) Methyl parathlon and Parathlon were much more
                                                                                                                                                        persistent 1n  lake water than soil water.
                                                                                                                                                        Residues  1n lake water up to nine months, whereas
                                                                                                                                                        only 1 nonth in soil water.                      ]
                                                                                                                                                     1)   (Belss and Gakstatter - 1965)  Persistence  depend-
                                                                                                                                                         ent on pH.  Half-life In solution  of pH 6, 7, and
                                                                                                                                                         8  ranged  from 3 ninths to 1  week,  respectively, 213

-------
        CHEMICAL
   CLASSIFICATION
     F   Ethion
     G   Trithion

     H   Fenthion
         Dlmethoate
     u.  Azodrin
     K.  Femtrothlon  (KeP)
     _.  Phosdrin


     H   Ronnel

     N   Oursban
                                                                                          INSECTICIDES   (Concluded)
                                                                                                                                                                                                              220
                                                USAGE
                                     Primarily  used  In  agriculture
Primarily used  in agriculture
                                     Mosquito larvicide.  Also.
                                     agricultural use
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural


Agricultural

Agricultural
                                                       DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
f)  31  percent  degraded after 4 ueeks in distilled H2o,  pH 6.0
9)  Main hydrolysis product, Diethyl fumarate (more toxic to minnows  than
    parent)  and dircethyl phophorodi thioic acid In basic  solutions
    - In acid solutions, degraiation products are dimethyl phophorothtonic
      acid and  2-mercaptodiethvl  succinite.   However, below  pH 7. hydrolysis
      will not  proceed for prolonged periods.  Other hydrolysis products:
      Oiethyl maleate and naleic  acid
    - Pronounced   tonic syner]lsra  between nalathion and diethyl  funnarate
a)  River water. pH 7.3, 50 percent decrease  In concentration tn 8 weeks
    - In distilled water, no ciange
b)  Approximately 95 percent degraded after 6 weeks tn distilled H20, pH 6
0  In river water, pH 7.3, 90 percent  reduction after 2 weeks
    - Decomposition products nit  identified
a)  90 percent  degradation after  2  weeks  in river water, pH  7.3
                         r*-4-Kethylthio-m-cresol
        Believed Fentnion-J
                         l»*0lnethyl-o-thio-phosphoric  acid
    - No change in distilled H^o
    Residual life up to 4 days in lakes and ponds, not greatly
    Influenced  by pH (Hulla, 1363)
a)  15 percent  degradation in 2 weeks in river water, pH 7.3
a;  After 8 weeks in river wat«r, pH  7.3, no change
>!  73.6 percent degraded in 3 weeks  in pH 6.0 distilled H20
0  At pH 6  in  distilled water rapid hydrolysis.  After  4 weeks
    approximately 98 percent degraded.  However, according to
    Porter-1964, the half-life in slightly acidic solutions was
    3 months.
a   Approximately 95 percent degraded after 1 week, in pK 6.0
    distilled H_0
a)  Conversion  to phosphate analog  by rainbow trout but  such
    conversion  does not occur In  goldfish	
                                                                                                                                                       211
191
181
211
1P.1
181
214
181
181
211

211
211
                                                                                                                                                                  ^ACCUMULATION  AND/OR  LONGEVITY
                                                                                                                                                                                                   •«*>"
                                                                                                                              aalf-Hfe of metabolic residues calculated at
                                                                                                                              12 hours                                  213
                                                                                                                           Complete disappearance in four »«ks
                                                                                                                           Complete degradation ?y lourth Meek
50 percent degradation after 8 weeks
111.   CABAHATES
      A   Sevin
      B    Hectran


      :    Matacil

      D    Mesurol


      E    Baygon
                                     Broad  spectrum application
                                        a;  In  river water, pH 7.3, 95 percent reduction in  one week
                                            1-Kaphthol. suspected degrtoation product was  not detected
                                            after  parent decomposition, perhaps rapid decomposition
                                        b)  Sevin  and  l-Naphthol metabclite completely degraded In lake
                                            water  after 3 days. pH 8.5
                                                                                                                                   ac pH 7.3
                                        0   85  percent degradation af
                                            Suspected degradation product. 4-Bioethyl-a/7if«>-3, 5-Oi«thyl
                                            Phenol, was not detected
                                        a)   90  percent degradation by second week In  river water. pH 7.1
                                            - No suspected decomposition products detected
                                        i)   100 percent degradation within one week in river water.  pM 73
                                                          I—Methyl tarbamlc acid
                                           Decomposed to—
                                                          1—*4-Methy!thlo-3,  S-Durethjl Phenol
                                        ,|  After one  week  in river water,  pH  7.3. 50 percent hydrolyied to
                                           its  phenol',  after 2 weeks,  70 percent. 4 weeks,  90 percent;  and
                                           8 weeks, 95  percent degraded
                                        - The phenol was also degraded such that  ,t was not detected after 8 weeks.
                                                                          181

                                                                          179
                                                                          181

                                                                          181
                                                                         181


                                                                         181
                                                                                                                           Complete degradation by jecond -e*<
                                                                                                                                                               Complete degradation by second «eek
        Complete degradation by fourth .«•

        fne phenol desraded slowly. »! ''a*"-"1 «Mk l! ""
        not detectable

-------
                                                                                                                                                                    221
    CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
USAGE
                                                                          FUNGICIDES
                                 DEGRADATION (SPECIFIC  CONDITIONS)
                                           AA'D PRODUCTS
ACCUMULATION AND/OR LONGEVITY
                           fungicidal use, in
                           to Its nerbteiddl us
                           Fir;i syntnttK fungicide
                                                                 Discussed under herbicides
                                                                 Oxidation retarded at nigh pH.  Main
                                                                 u3tr.-3> was carboxin•  ^t	»Sulfoxid

                                                                 pH ^ and -i, furtner ciidac;on of Sulf
                                                                                                         227

-------
    CHEMICAL
CLASSIFICATION
      Rotenone
  ?   Cabaryl
   3   Antimycin
                                            USAGE
                                 Pisciclde
                                 Used to control ghost shrimp
                                 in oyster  beds

                                 Also used  as  insecticide against
                                 pests of fruit, nuts, vegetables,
                                 forage crops  and cotton
                                 Piscicide -  used  in marine
                                 habitats
      MISCELLANEOUS  PESTICIDES
     —           i          ———^^—
      DEGRADATION  (SPECIFIC CONDITIONS)
                 AND  METABOLITES
                                                                                                                                                                                                   222
                                                                          Tim dependent changes In Rotenone to«1elty
                                                                          - Correlated to the transition from colloid  to i dissolved state.
                                                                          - Toxic change proceeds at greater rate at high temperature
                                                                          • Inactivation 6 to IS days In water solution
                                                                          - Unstable In light,  temperature Increase increases effectiveness
                                                                           i)
In  sea water, hydrolyies to l-llaphthol (Kannen. et al.,  1967).
1-Napthol 1s quite unstable In alkaline sea water.
                                                                                                                                               192
                                                                190
l-Haphthol  l'9"t and Microorganisms,

(more toxic to clans
and fish  than parent
compound)
                                       C02 + Unidentified Products
     Degradation 1n light and dark produced different degradation
     products
   - Precipitate forms upon exposure to light (red color) contains
     stable free radical (2/3 toxic as 1-IUpthol)
   - In sterile, anaerobic, light-exposed systems. 1-Hapthol de-
     creased 0.3 percent per day  for 30 days
   - With Qg.  degradation rate was 1.6 percent for 40 days; its
     degradation attributed to photooxidation rather than photo-
     decomposition
   - Optimum stability of 1-Hapthol is pH 6.3. but-ynstable at pH 8.3.
     the pH of sea water

j)  Degradation by the frtsh water algae. Scenedeswus,   suspected
   hydrolysis and oxidation to form H-Hethyl carbamic acid + (183
   + formic Acid


a)  Rapid breakdown  above pH 8.5,  increase in toxicu>  as  temperature
    increases
    - Degradation in  fresh water directly related to hardness.
     Exposure to light  trd  Harm alkaline waters, becomes  sub!ethai
     in 7  to 10 days   Oeto/ification  first to occur in surface Haters
                                                                                                                                               193
                                                                                                                                                            ACCUMULATION AND/OR LONGEVITY
                                                                               Treatment of oud flats with Cabary) failed to
                                                                               recolontze with ousels for 13 oonths
                                                                             Resldudlity in fresh water - 24 to 56 hours
                                                                               (Walker, et.al. - 1964}
                                                                             Residual ity in salt water - 5 days

-------
employed in these studies.   The results, though valuable,  are not
readily interpretable on a common basis.  Only a limited number of
field studies have been reported for the Southeastern region.
Extrapolation of the laboratory results to field conditions is not valid.
For example, discrete differences in time  of persistence may occur
for a  single compound because it may be degraded via several physical,
biological, chemical or a combination of these ways.  The pathway
depends on such environmental parameters as temperature,  oxygen
concentration and the presence of other reactive  substances.  To
facilitate  evaluation of existing knowledge the  pesticides will be
considered as chemically-related groups.

                  a.  Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
        The chlorinated hydrocarbons include DDT.  This was one of
the first and  most extensively used of this  group.  It has been of great
benefit but belatedly, concern has been expressed regarding its effect
on life systems. Certain generalized statements can be made about
chlorinated hydrocarbons subsequent to inspection of the laboratory
and field studies presented in Table E-l.   The chlorinated hydrocarbons
are synthetic organic compounds of which a number are known for their
"persistence" or longevity (periods logger  than one year) of residues.
Chlorinated hydrocarbon compounds which  have received considerable
public attention are  Endrin,  Dieldrin, Toxaphene and Mir ex.  In fact,
these  compounds are the ones most commonly found in Southeastern
        3
waters.   Persistent residues of these compounds have a low water
solubility and have strong tendencies to sorb onto soil and sediment
                               1 4
particles within natural waters.  '   The biological persistence of DDT
is attributable to the high lipophilic character of  the molecule.  This
characteristic enables  it to be stored and concentrated in the  fat
deposits of aquatic organisms and higher life forms.   The  residues
                                  223

-------
become magnified with each successive step in the food chain.


Degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons has been shown to occur


faster under anaerobic conditions than under aerobic conditions,


wherein high bacterial numbers and high temperature regimes were

        2
utilized.   This is  an important consideration.  The waters of the


southeastern United States are classified as warm since the annual

average is 65° F.  This  condition would appear to  favor accelerated


degradation  in this region as compared to colder regions of the United


States. However,  quantitative documentation for such a deduction is


not available.


        Understanding of the degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesti-


cides in the Southeastern region is deficient.  Especially important is the


need to intensify long-term degradation field studies under natural conditions.




                        b.   Organophosphates


        In recent years,  there has been a gradual increase in  the use


of more readily degradable organophosphates  in place of chlorinated


hydrocarbons.  These compounds are classified as non-persistent


because their residues last for  only a few months, under normal

                 4
application rates.   This group includes Malathion,  Methyl parathion


Parathion, and Diaainon.  These  compounds undergo hydrolysis in the


aquatic environment where  microbial activity and  pH greatly influence


this  rate.    The hydrolysis  rate in distilled water  increases with
                                               7
decreasing sulfur content of the phosphate ester.   At pH greater than

                                          8
7. 0, the duration or half-life is decreased.



       Southeastern field work has included limited identification and


measurement of persistence in sediment residues.  These studies have


not been designed to define  degradation rates  "in situ".
                               224

-------
                          c.   Carbamates
       Another class of non-persistent pesticides are the carbamates.
 The compounds have agricultural applications and are a comparatively
 new class of chemicals. These compounds contain neither chlorine nor
 phosphorus  but their cholinesterase-inhibitory action is similar to that of
 organophosphates.  Carbamates are generally referred to as non-
 persistent pesticides.   Carbaryl has been shown to degrade in  sea
                                         9
 water to form unidentified toxic products.

                     d.  Herbicidal Compounds
       Herbicides are included in a variety of chemical classes
 (see Table E-l) including a few chlorinated hydrocarbons,  organo-
 phosphates and carbamates.   These compounds have a range of
 persistence from several weeks to months and exhibit varying  degrees
 of water solubility.  Photo-induced  transformations of halogenated
 herbicides have been widely demonstrated under laboratory conditions * 0.
 Water yields hydroxylated and reduced products. Degradation  mech-
 anisms  for other types  of herbicides involve oxidation or hydrolysis
 to nonphytotoxic products.

                       e.  Inorganic Pesticides
       The  inorganic pesticides often yield residues that are virtually
 non-degradable.  The cation remaining is often potentially toxic and is
 represented by such metals as mercury, arsenic, copper, and lead.
 Copper  sulfate has been widely used to control the growth of some
 submerged vascular plants.     Mercury  compounds,  on the other hand,
                                           12
have found great usage  as  fungicidal agents.    These fungicides may
be transported to water systems. However, once applied, the  elemental
forms remain in soils unless  removed through leaching.4
                                225

-------
       Laboratory studies which have been performed are not readily


applicable to field conditions for the Southeast.  Therefore,  any


correlation which exists between these respective degradation rates and


pathways  remain undefined.





                3.   Physical Influences on Degradation



       The degradation of pesticides in the aqueous environment is


influenced by physical factors unique to each individual system.  The


physical factors may be sorption onto organic or inorganic particulate


surfaces, transport between the aqueous and benthic phases  along a


waterway, or volatilization into the atmosphere.   The result is con-


comitant adjustment in the concentration of residue at the original site.


Quantitative information on these processes has been obtained only very


recently and is still meager.  The interrelationship of the physical


processes and degradation mechanisms and their rates is still largely


undefined.





                           a.  Adsorption



       Many pesticides are almost insoluble in water but can be found


in significant quantities in the aqueous  and sediment phases  of water


bodies.  Often, they are present because they have been sorbed by

                                             13
various solids that act  as condensation nuclei.     Therefore, it is


important to understand the phenomena of sorption prior to evaluation


of degradation and transport processes.  Sorption is not a degradation


mechanism "per  se" but it alters the availability of the pesticide for


subsequent  chemical or biological  degradation.



       The extent of pesticide sorption is related to the solubility of


the compound,  the nature of the material on which it is sorbed and
                               226

-------
other properties of the aqueous system.  Strong sorption bonds to clay



minerals are  characteristic of some pesticides, such as DDT.14







                        (1)  Chemical  Reactions




       Hydrolytic mechanisms are accelerated by sediment sorption.



The rate of reaction  is time and pH dependent,  i. e. ,  if the pH is held



constant, the  rate of degradation is related to time by first-order



kinetics. Atrazine hydrolyzes to the non-toxic  compound,  Hydroxyatrazine.



The reaction has been shown to be catalyzed by sorption onto colloidal



surfaces. '•-'' *"  The catalysis  is apparently associated with sorption at



-COOH groups of the sediment.  The literature is  generally deficient in



similar  sediment-catalyzed degradation for other  chlorinated hydro-



carbons. The relationship of the sorption process to  chemical degra-



dation mechanisms of pesticides  has not been specifically established.








                      (2)  Biological Degradation




     Sorption onto sediment influences  degradation by enabling pesticide



compounds to settle to the bottom of water systems where they become


                             13 17
subject to microbial activity.   '    Bacteria have been found to sorb



pesticides during flocculation  and settling processes.  Gram-positive



bacteria isolated from Lake Erie have demonstrated the capacity to


                                                                18
sorb 1 part per million (ppm) of Aldrin from water in 20 minutes.



Chlorinated hydrocarbon degradation,  subsequent to settling of the



pesticide particle complex to microbially active sediments, has been



demonstrated. 17' ^




    Organophosphate degradation in sediments  is also catalyzed by the



presence of microbiological organisms. "> ^0, *•*•
                                227

-------
 Parathion is considered the most resistant of the organophosphates.
 However, this compound has been shown to be readily  subject to
 biodegradation in microbially active lake sediments.  It has been
 concluded that without microbial activity,  Parathion would remain
 in the natural environment for months, while in microbially active
 environments, is degraded in a  matter of weeks. °

                         (3)  Cycling (Physical)
        Sorption of pesticides followed by settling does  not assure
 that the resulting material remains in the  bottom sediments of aquatic
 systems.  Eventually the pesticide may be cycled into  overlying
 waters.  This  could result from spring and fall overturns in lake and
 reservoirs,  and from an increase  in the scouring velocity of flowing
 streams. *3  Changes in pesticide concentrations can also occur as a
 result of  release or desorption of the pesticide from the particle through
 stresses  on dynamic equilibrium processes.  Heptachlor, Dieldrin and
 DDT  sorb very quickly onto clay materials. ^ After sorption,  desorption
 may occur although the rate of desorption  is usually lower than for
          22
 sorption.    Sorption-desorption rates in aqueous systems are partic-
 ularly influenced by salinity, pH and organic materials.  A study con-
                                                        2 3
 ducted with Endrin and Dieldrin  demonstrated this effect.     An analysis
 of the estuarine sediment showed 14 to 18% organic  content,  31% sand,
 25% silt,  16% clay,  and the balance other organic material and compounds.
Table E-2 relates the effects of  added organic material,  pH and salinity
to sorption of Endrin and Dieldrin.
                               228

-------
                                  Table E-2
             Factors Influencing Sorption of Endrin and Dieldrin
                                                               23
Pesticide
Presence of
organic materials
         PH
      Salinity
Cndrin
Dieldrin
High initial sorption
however,  after 7 days
of contact, insignifi-
cant amount of Endrin
associated with
sediment
Insignificant in-
fluence during 7
day period.
38-43% uptake within
one day in pH range 3
to 10. 5 after 7 days at
pH  7. 0 most of initially
sorbed Endrin released
from sediments
Initial uptake at pH
3. 8 was 26%; At pH
8.0, initial uptake
was 0%, after approx-
imately 70 hrs.  of
contact,  maximum
sorbed quantities
ranged fronn 58-64%.
At pH 8. 0 complete
desorption after approx.
170 hrs.  of contact.
Sorption maximum
in range 13  to 17%
after 1 hour. Complete
desorption after 7
days.  Salinity above
17% and pH  7 to 8-no-
sorption occurred.

Sorption independ-
ent of salinity
      Source:  Rowe, et.  al.

            It can be concluded that sorption of both Endrin and Dieldrin is the
      time-dependent and pH sensitive.  Endrin sorption is salinity dependent
      but Dieldrin sorption is not.  These processes of sorption, sedimentation

      and  subsequent return to solution suggests a mechanism by which aquatic
      organisms can be exposed to pesticide effects long after the initial  release.

      Very little has been documented regarding the relationship between

      sorption-desorption and degradation mechanisms.


                                b.  Trans location

                                  (1)  Reservoirs

            Natural hydrological dynamics involve consideration of factors

      such as current, turbidity and temperature.   These control the
                                    229

-------
transport of pesticides in the aqueous media.   The distribution of
pesticides in the water influences the rate and mechanisms of chemical
degradation and the availability of these substances for biological
uptake.  These factors can be observed in the case of direct application
of a pesticide to  a reservoirs' surface.   Widescale applications of the
herbicide 2,  4-Dichloro-phenoxyacetic acid  (2, 4-D) have been made to
reservoirs of southern Tennessee, northern Alabama and northern
Georgia.  The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) made these in 1967
                                                           24  25
and  1971 to control the aquatic plant,  Eurasin Water Milfoil.
The area of application was extensive.  Pesticide was monitored in
flowing and static aones.
       In the first study, 888 tons of the 20% butoxy ethanol ester form
of 2,  4-D were applied in granular form to 8, 000 surface acres of seven
reservoirs in eastern Tennessee and northern Alabama.  These resevoirs
are  spread over a main-channel distance of 352 river miles.  Application
varied from 60 to 100 Ibs. of 2, 4-D, acid equivalent, per  acre.  Seven
monitoring stations were located on the Guntersville Reservoir in
Alabama.  Five stations were located on Watts Bar Reservoir in
Tennessee.  Twenty-four hours after  application,  water milfoil samples
contained concentrations up to 8. 26 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
indicating active uptake of the herbicide. Sediment samples, taken
from static water areas (embayments),  contained higher and more
persistent residue  concentrations than did areas of rapid current.   In
Watts Bar Reservoir, significant concentrations of 2,  4-D were found
in mud samples   as high as  58. 8  mg/kg after 10 months  . At eight
of nine water treatment plants located along the Tennessee  River
concentrations of 2, 4-D were less than 1 micrograms per  liter
(/
-------
were 2y6
-------
organisms.   The plankton removed 24% of the herbicide within 1 hour

after  application and a proportional amount during the next 7 hours.

A trend of progressive downstream dilution of waterborne 2, 4-D was

observed over 214 miles.  This was indicated by the concentrations of
2,  4-D that  accumulated in mussels located on the bank edges of tributaries and

channel slopes.   One anomalous pretreatment sample of mussels below

Guntersville dam contained the highest 2,  4-D concentration found at

any time during the  monitoring.  The source  of 2,  4-D was unknown.

Water from the  treated areas continued to be used for domestic purposes

during this period without user complaints.  Finished drinking water

contained 1  to 2 ppb concentrations of 2, 4-D after standard treatment

practices.

       Hydrological influences on the distribution of other chlorinated

hydrocarbons and organophosphates under natural flowing and static fresh
water systems have not been reported for  the Southeastern region.

       A number of conclusions can be formulated regarding the

transport and distribution of pesticides in  reservoirs:

       •    Pesticides are more persistent in static water areas
            (both aqueous and sedimental levels considered) than
            in those subjected to dynamic current action.

       •    Pesticide concentrations in the aqueous-phase are further
            influenced by: (a) presence of thermal stratification and
            (b) the amount of plankton present.

       •    The  physical form in which the pesticide is applied
            (aqueous vs.  granular) influences the degree of desired
            effectiveness upon application  to water.

       •    Pesticides such as 2,  4-D are not completely removed from
            raw  water during conventional treatment practices.
                                232

-------
                           (2) Estuaries
       Pesticides can reach  estuarine basins from direct application
to its waters and from discharges of municipal and industrial wastes.
But the largest contribution of pesticides to the estuary occurs through
run-off from orchards and farmlands.    Clay, silt and detritus sorb
insoluble,  persistent pesticides and, depending on the degree of ero-
sion, transport them to  estuarine basins.  It has been estimated that
11 tons of soil per acre may be washed away in a year where farming
practices are poor.  However, under optimum practices,  there is no
               26
erosional loss.     The exact  quantities of pesticides  which reach the
estuary by this process  are not known.   There is  a seasonal fluctuation
in the  concentrations  detected in the water and in the sediments.  Since
most pesticides are introduced into hydrological systems between early
spring and late summer, the  highest levels in the sediments are expected
several months later.  A majority of streams are at low flow during
October  and November;  hence, most of the erosion product transported
during and immediately  following the pesticide application season are
deposited in the streams beds by this time.  Relatively little  amounts
would have  an opportunity to  pass from subbasins to costal waters.
During the spring rains  of April and May,  however,  the streams are at
high flow,  transporting  a near maximum suspended sediment load to
the estuary just prior to pesticide application season.  Thus, the detected
residues in the estuaries may be indicative of the residual effect of
the previous year's (or  years') applications of pesticides.  ^'
       Published results of pesticide distribution in an estuarine
environment are limited to a  single study on the movement of DDT in
                    28
a tidal marsh ditch.     DDT  distribution after  direct application of
0.2 Ib. /acre was immediately influenced by the wind and by the ocean-
directed  flow of the water.  The amount of vegetation and fauna influenced
                               233

-------
the amount of DDT which moved out of the marsh outlet through

biological uptake and sorption of the pesticide.  The amount of DDT
detected in the sediment and vegetation and the times of survey are
given in Table E-3.

                              Table E-3
                 DDT Uptake by Selected Southeastern
                                             ?£>
                        Estuarine Substrates^0
Substrate
vegetation
(sedges and
grasses)
sediment
Max. Concentration (mg/kg)
75-3 to 5 wks. post treatment
3.35 - 6 wks. post treatment
Average Concentration
(mg/kg) 7 wks. postreatmenf
9. 1
0.76
 Source:  Croker and Wilson


It was demonstrated that fish and vegetation accumulated 1500 times the
maximum concentration of DDT detected in the water.  Snails, crabs
and  sediments accumulated  144,  99, and 66 times as much,  respectively.
The  persistence of residues  in the water,  sediments and biota beyond
4 months was not measured.  The amount of DDT which moved out of

the tidal marsh was detected in the sediment at the marsh outlet 11 weeks
after treatment.

       It has been assumed  that a major portion of the  pesticides which

enter estuaries are dissipated through the processes  of dilution, chemical
decay, flocculation and precipitation to bottom sediments, and biological
       26, 29
uptake.

       Preliminary results  of studies  on the stability of pesticides in

seawater were reported by  the Bureau of Commerical  Fisheries in Gulf

Breeze,  Florida.  The degradation rates of 4 pesticides in seawater

maintained under laboratory conditions, are  shown in Table  E-4. 30

Degradation  under natural conditions has not been reported for other
chlorinated hydrocarbons and organophosphate compounds.
                                 234

-------
                     Table E-4
  Stability of Pesticides in Natural Seawater
(salinity 29. 8 ppt; pH 8. 1) Concentrations in
                                                          30

Pesticide
p.p'-DDT
p,p' -DDE*
p,p'-DDD*
Aid r in**
Dieldrin*
Malathion
Parathion
Day After Start of Exnprimpnf
0
2.9


2. 6

3.0
2.9
6
.75
. 096

. 58
. 74
0.2
1.9
17
1.0
.95
. 081
. 096
1. 0
0.2
1.25
24
.27
.065
. 041
0. 01
1. 0
	
1.0
31
. 18
. 034
. 038
0. 01
.75
	
. 71
38
. 16
. 037
. 037
0. 01
.56
	
. 37
Source:  Wilson, et.  al.

*  Metabolites of parent compound.
** From the seventeenth day onward, 2 unidentified peaks appeared on
the chromatographic charts after Aldrin had eluted.

       Pelagic  animals may consume pesticide-laden detritus or food

organisms and transport the pesticide to other parts of the environment.

Oysters can concentrate up to 70,000 times the test water concentra-

tion of DDT.  Pinfish and Atlantic Croker populations in Pensacola Bay

move offshore to spawn.  During the Spawning process they deposit
1/2 Ib.  of DDT, previously accumulated in the estuary. 26

       It may be concluded that:

       •    The physical factors influencing pesticide translocation in
            estuaries are,  in the main, undefined.  The physical
            stability  of pesticides under laboratory conditions bears
            little relationship to natural systems.

       •    Biological organisms influence translocation through uptake.
            Sessile macrophytes inhibit translocation,  whereas, motile
            forms (fish) enhance translocation.


                      (3) Closed-Water Systems

       The  majority of degradation  studies have been performed under

laboratory and closed-water field conditions.  Closed water or standing
                              235

-------
•water systems (lotic) are those confined within a basin (lakes, ponds,

swamps,  etc. ) and possessing limited horizontal movement.
                                                               1 r  o I   o o
       During sediment-water simulations and field monitoring,

pesticide concentrations have been shown to decrease in the aqueous

phase while increasing in the sediment.  The  rate of removal from the

aqueous  phase depends on the chemical characteristics and concentration

of the pesticide,  the  chemical and physical aspects of the water, the

sediment characteristics,  and the ratio of pesticide compound to

sediment.   '      Results of a laboratory study show that the ratio of

L/indane  to sediment,controls sorption. ^0 The lower the ratio,  the

greater the extent of sorption.  Influencing the process are  the concen-

tration of organics in the sediment, the concentration of suspended

matter, the initial Lindane  concentration, and the quantity of clay.  These

variables were ranked in order of importance.  They were sediment

concentration, Lindane concentration, clay content and Lindane  to

sediment ratio.    In another study,  approximately 57% of  X-BHC

added to a simulated lake impoundment system, was sorbed within 24

hrs. 32  With Parathion, approximately 60% of the applied  concentration was
                                                     6
associated with lake  sediments after a 24 hour period.   Thermal

stratification  effects on the settling characteristics of sorbed particles

are not available.

       The presence of biota strongly affects  the distribution of

pesticides in lotic systems.  Sorption by algae was reported to be

several orders of magnitude greater than it is by clay, which in turn is
                          2
greater than it is by  sand.   A natural pond in Florida was treated with

Dichlorobenil to  yield a final concentration of  1.0 mg/1 and  compared with a
                                  3 i
similar pond which was untreated.    Thermal stratification did not

occur in either pond.  Seven days after treatment,  the hydrosoil zone

contained greater quantities of Dichlorobenil than did the aqueous phase.

Within 4  months,  the concentration within the aqueous phase had returned
                                236

-------
to pretreatment levels.   Biological organisms concentrated significant
quantities of the pesticide.  One day after treatment,  Gam bus ia
affinis ( a minnow fish) contained approximately 11 mg/kg; Poecilia
latipinna (sailfin mollie)  approximately 5. 0 mg/kg; plankton 7. 2 mg/kg;
and Chara 1.16 mg/kg.  By the second day, plankton contained 2. 9 mg/kg;
G. affinis. 6. 62 mg/kg; P.  Latipinna, 4. 2 mg/kg; and Chara, 0. 77 mg/kg.
In summary,  sorption of pesticides by particulate matter (biological  and
inorganic) is an important mechanism in the translocation of pesticides
between the aqueous-phase and the sediment of the  system.  The rates of
translocation have been determined to be pesticide  concentration depen-
dent.
       The results  published for these  rate studies must be considered
as applicable only to those particular systems.  Extrapolation to other
systems is not valid because of limitations of the experimental design
and inadequate assessment of all of the important environmental para-
meters.   Only approximations of the effect of pesticidal translocation
on degradation rates and mechanisms in closed-systems can be presently
made.
     Determination of the physical behavior of a specific pesticide, under
conditions simulating those of the natural  system to which the compound
is to be introduced, must be established prior to "in situ" application.
Without appropriately designed experimental efforts,  using dynamic
systems,  there is little likelihood that substantial progress will be made
in identification and evaluation of physical degradation mechanisms.

                       4. Biological Degradation
    Flora and fauna are  important factors in the translocation and
degradation of many pesticides.  Residues of certain  chlorinated
                               237

-------
hydrocarbons persist in biological material for extended periods and
                                    5
are magnified through the food chain.    Research has been mainly


focused on DDT.
                         a.  Microbiological



       Microbial degradation plays a major role in the degradation of


pesticides.  Even the persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons show some


degree of microbial degradation.  Environmental factors, such as,


oxygen concentration and the amount of light exert significant

                                             2  34  35
influence on the rate of microbial degradation.  '    '


       Partial dechlorination of DDT leads  to DDD.  In invertebrates


(fish) the process  requires molecular oxygen,  but in microorganisms,


the presence of oxygen has been reported to inhibit  the reaction.


Dechlorination in  microbial systems is believed to  involve the  cytochrome


oxidase  iron-carbonyl complex.   ' -1' The absence of oxygen enables the


cytochrome-Fe to remain in an activity-dependent reduced state.


Facultative anaerobes,  such as, Escherichia coli, Aerobacter  aerogenes


and Klebsiella pneumoniae have demonstrated the ability to convert 80%

                               34
of DDT  to DDD within 12  hours.    The cytochrome oxidase iron-carbonyl


complex has also been shown to dissociate under the influence  of light.


These two factors may partially explain the  persistence of DDT residues


in aerobic sediments.



       In comparative sediment studies,  anaerobically-catalyzed microbial


degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons occurred faster than aerobically-

                                2  6 32
catalyzed microbial degradation.  '   '     The by-products produced


under each condition were different.  Heptachlor epoxide and Dieldrin


have demonstrated the strongest resistance  to either  anaerobic or


aerobic degradation. Chlorinated hydrocarbons have  been ranked in  order


of increasing  persistence as follows:  Lindane, Heptachlor,  Endrin  DDT

                                             2
DDD, Aldrin, Heptachlor epoxide,  Dieldrin.



                                238

-------
       Degradation of DDT occurs in the presence of oxygen and
a common shallow-water bacterium  native to Florida, Pseudomonas
          Q                                          '
piscicida.    The cultured bacterium was able to degrade 90% of an
applied 1 ppb DDT in 24 hours.  Direct removal (presumably sorption)
of DDT from solution was also demonstrated.  The metabolized end-
products were DDD and DDE.   The latter is  considered  less toxic than
DDT.  Because of the liposoluble character of DDT  and the  large
lipoprotein surface  area of the bacterial cell, it was  postulated that
uptake was enhanced.
        Organophosphates break down at a pH greater than 7. 0 and since
bacteria create a microenvironment of high pH (9. 5)  immediately
adjacent to the cell,  it has been proposed that P. piscicidas  readily
                                      8       ~
metabolizes  Malathion in this  fashion.

                             b.  Plants
        Plants  rapidly sorb and accumulate large quantities of
herbicides.  Other pesticides  may be accumulated with little or no
                       3 8
degradation occurring.    Marsh grasses and sedges accumulate
large quantities of DDT (1500  times  the maximum water concentration of
DDT).  Subsequently plant death leads to deposition of the previously
stored DDT in the sediment.   The extent of degradation  by plants varies
with the type of plant and pesticide.  Field studies of aquatic plant
residues in the Southeast have been cursory.  There  is a need for
information regarding these degradation pathways.

                            c.  Animals
       Some invertebrates and vertebrates can remove  pesticide
                                   39  40 41
compounds directly from the water.    '   '    There  is considerable
variation with species in the amount  of pesticides accumulated and the
extent of degradation. 37' 4°'  41' 43  Most degradation studies have been

                                239

-------
focused on DDT.  Fish and oysters are capable of eliminating

                                                               41, 45
accumulated concentrations when placed in pesticide-free water.


It was demonstrated in a laboratory investigation that Tilapia and


sunfish,exposed for 31 days to DDT and Methoxychlor,concentrated


these substances 10,600-fold and 200-fold,respectively.  Tilapia


were able to metabolize DDT to a greater extent than sunfish.  DDD


was the major metabolic product.   Tilapia were  able to metabolize


Methoxychlor faster than sunfish.   Tilapia contained higher amounts


of the bis-phenols, produced by o-demethylation of the parent compound.




                       5.  Degradation-Effects



       When agricultural chemicals are introduced  into the aquatic


system,  two effects may occur as  a result of degradation processes:


alteration of the water quality and  formation  of compounds  more toxic


than the parent compound.  These  secondary effects may stress


nontarget organisms.




                         a.  Water Quality-



       Water quality may be  altered as a result  of the degradation of


a pesticide or its target species, producing a temporary toxic effect


to non-target  species.  Such alterations may be, for example,  a sharp


decrease in pH due to acidic degradation by-products,or a depletion  of

                                      46, 47
the oxygen due to decaying  organisms.        Silvex application to a


backwater of the Santee River in South Carolina was made to  control

               47
alligator weed.     The herbicide killed the weed which then settled


to the bottom  and began decomposing.  After several weeks,  there was


no dissolved oxygen in the bottom two feet of water.   This contrasted


with oxygen concentration of 6-8 mg/1 in adjacent untreated areas
                               240

-------
                             b.  Toxicity
       Laboratory studies have shown that photoisomers of Aldrin,
Dieldrin,  and Heptachlor are more toxic than the parent compounds  to
such freshwater organisms as fish,  amphibia, flatworms and Crustacea.
                                                      48  49
Sunlight catalyzes the production of such photoisomers.  '
Photoaldrin is 11 times more toxic to mosquito larvae than Aldrin.
Photoisodin, however, was shown to be less toxic than either
Isodrin or Endrin.
       The  seawater hydrolysis product,  l-Napthol,of Carbaryl
(Sevin) has been shown to be twice as toxic to fish as the parent
compound when both were tested at 1. 3 mg/1.  It is  also more toxic
                                                           9
to young clams at a concentration of 6. 4 mg/1 than Carbaryl.
A reddish precipitate  results from the instability of 1-Napthol under
alkaline  conditions.  This precipitate was found to be two-thirds as
                                  9
toxic  as 1-Napthol to bay mussels.
       It was demonstrated with the fathead minnow,  Pimephales
promelas that the basic hydrolysis product, Diethyl  fumarate,  was
                           51
more toxic than Malathion.     A pronounced synergistic effect
between Malathion and its basic hydrolysis products was shown.
Diethyl fumarate could be produced in an  amount sufficient to
produce a TLm (median tolerance limit) concentration.  This would
occur when  64% of the TL rn concentration  of Malathion had hydrolyzed
to form Diethyl fumarate.  Therefore, the difference  of a day or two
in the application time of Malathion on two adjacent  areas  could result
in a condition in which a considerable quantity  of the breakdown product,
along with a substantial quantity of the parent compound, could be washed
into a common water source.
                               241

-------
        Two areas of degradation research which are in need of greater
 support are: (1) determination of the toxicities of degradation compounds
 to nontarget species and (2) determination of the synergisms between
 mixtures of the parent and degradation compounds.

                            6. Conclusions
        The most frequently occurring  pesticides in Southeastern waters
are chlorinated hydrocarbons whose persistence may be in the order of
years.  In general,  organophosphates,  carbamates,  and herbicidal com-
pounds  disappear from the water within a matter of a few weeks or
months.
        Available data on degradation rates, mechanisms, and products
is very limited.  Information is  based  on laboratory studies which can-
not be extrapolated to natural environmental conditions.  For example,
halogenated herbicides are readily degraded through photo-induced
mechanisms.   How these mechanisms  relate to  degradation of herbicides
in the natural environment has not been established.
        The sorption of pesticides by suspended  material and substrates
in natural waters is an important factor in the degradation process.  It
may facilitate chemical reactions and translocation of pesticides to the
estuary or to areas  favorable for degradation.
        Information on the occurrence and distribution of pesticides
reveal that, while no concentrations may be detected in the water,
concentrations in the/
-------
       Pesticides concentrations which reach bottom sediments may be
recycled into the overlying water.  Recycling can result from fall and
spring overturns following thermal de-stratification or from the release
or desorption of pesticides from the sediments.

       The chemical degradation products of certain chlorinated hydro-
carbons and carbamates are many times more toxic than the parent
compounds.  Such toxicities are vital considerations of impact on non-
target organisms.

                        7.  Recommendations
1.  The Environmental Protection Agency and U. S.  Department of
Agriculture should jointly support programs to develop information
regarding the effect of pesticide sorption by particulate and organic
matter on the subsequent chemical  and biological degradation
mechanism.
2.  The Environmental Protection Agency should increase inhouse and
supported research to develop information regarding specific pesticide
degradation rates,  mechanisms,  products  and toxicities in fresh,
brackish and salt water.
3.  A coordinated surveillance  system must be established to provide
in-depth information on reservoirs, lakes,  rivers,  and estuaries.  The
results must relate the movement of pesticides to hydrological conditions,
Quantification of the amounts and types of pesticides being transported
to the  estuaries relative to climatic and  seasonal factors is needed.
Rates  of interchange between biological organisms and sediment, must
be established.
4.  Federal and State  requirements must be established to insure that
extended field analyses are performed in conjunction with pesticide -
related fish kills and go beyond the minimum establishment of a cause.
These analyses  should include those factors enumerated in the afore-
mentioned  recommendations as much as  the individual case permits.

                                  243

-------
                           8.  References


 1.  Cleaning Our Environment:  The Chemical Basis for Action, A
     Report by the Subcommittee on Environmental Improvement,  Com-
     mittee on Chemistry and Public Affairs,  American Chemical
     Society,  Washington, D. C. ,  212-213,  1969.

 2,  Hill, D.W. and McCarty, P. L. ,  Anaerobic Degradation of
     Selected  Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides,  J. Wat. Poll.
     Contr. Fed. ,39(8),  1259-1277, 1967.

 3.  Butler, P. A. , Monitoring  Pesticide Pollution,  BioScience,  19(10).
     889-891,  1969.

 4.  Report of the Secretary's Commission on Pesticides and Their
     Relationship to  Environmental Health, U.S.  Dept.  of Health,
     Education,  and  Welfare,  99-123,  Dec.  1969.

 5.  Goldberg, E. D.,  Butler, P.,  Meier, P., Menzel, D. , Risebrough,
     R.W.  and Stickel, L. F. , Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in the Marine
     Environment, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. ,
     1-21,  1971.

 6.  Graetz,  D. A. ,  Chesters, G. ,  Daniel, T.C., Newland,  L. W. ,
     and Lee,  G. B. ,  Parathion Degradation in Lake Sediments, J.
     Wat. Poll.  Contr. Fed.  42J2), R76-R94,  1970.

 7.  Cowart,  R. P. ,  Bonner,  F. L. , and Epps,  E. A. ,  Jr.,  Rate  of
     Hydrolysis of Seven Organophosphate Pesticides, Bull of
     Environ., Contam.  & Toxicol. , 6_ (3),  231-234, 1971.

 8.  Johnson,  R. F. ,  Food Chain Studies,  Bureau of Commercial
     Fisheries,  Report,  Gulf  Breeze,  Florida, Circ. #260, 9-11,  1966.

 9.  Lamberton,  J.G. and Claeys,  R. R. , Degradation of 1-Naphthol in
     Sea Water, J. Agr. Food Chem. , _^8_(1), 92-96, 1970.
10.   Plimmer, J. R, The Photochemistry of Halogenated Herbicides,
     Residue Reviews, 33, 47-74, 1971.

11.   Sutton, D. L. ,  Durham, D. A. ,  Bingham, S.W.  and Foy, C. L. ,
     Influence of Simazine on Apparent Photosynthesis of Aquatic
     Plants and Herbicide Residue Removal From Water, Weed Sci.
     17, 56-59, 1969.
                                244

-------
                        (References -  Continued)


12.  Menzel, D.W., Anderson, J. ,  and Randtke, A., Marine
    Phytoplankton Vary in Their Response to Chlorinated Hydrocarbons,
    Science,  167.  1724-1726, 1970.

13.  Pfister, Robert M. , Dugan,  P. R. and Frea, James I. ,  Micro-
    particulates:  Isolation From Water and Identification of Associated
    Chlorinated Pesticides, Science,  166, 878-879, 1969-

14.   Huang, J. and Liao,  C. ,  Adsorption of Pesticides  by  Clay Minerals,
     Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE, 9_6_ (SA5),
     1057-1078, 1970.
15.   Chesters, G. and Konrad, J. G. ,  Effects of Pesticide  Usage on
    Water Quality,  BioScience, 2JJ12),  565-569, 1971.

16.   Hance, R. J.  and Chesters, G.  , The Fate of Hydroxyatrazine in a
    Soil and a Lake Sediment,  Soil  Biol.  BioChem. , J_,  309-315,  1969.

17.   Veith,  G.D. and Lee, G. F. , Water Chemistry of Toxaphene - Role
     of Lake Sediments, Environ. Sci.  & Tech. , 5_ (3), 230-234,
     1971.

18.   Leshniowsky,  W. O. ,  Dugan, P. R. , Pfister, R. M. , Frea, J.I.
     and Randies,  C. I.  , Aldrin:  Removal from Lake Water by
     Flocculent Bacteria,  Science,  169,  993-995, 1970.

19.   Lichtenstein, E. P. , Schulz, K. R. ,  Skrentny, R. F. and Tsukano,
     Y. , Toxicity  and Fate of Insecticide Residues in Water, Archiv.
    Environ.  Health,  12,  199-213,  1966.

20.   Eichelberger, J. W. and Lichtenberg, J.J.,  Persistence of
     Pesticides in River Water,  Environ. Sci. & Tech., 5_ (6), 541-
     544,  1971.

21.   Randall,  C.W.  and Lauderdale, R. A. , Biodegradation of  Malathion,
    Journal of the Sanitary Engineering  Division,  ASCE, 9_3JSA6),
     145-156,  1967.

22.  Huang, J. C. ,  Effect of Selected Factors  on Pesticide  Sorption and
    Desorption in the Aquatic System, J. Wat. Poll.  Contr. Fed.,
     43  (8), 1739-1748,  1971.
                            245

-------
                          (References - Continued)

23.  Rowe,  D. R. , Canter,  L. W.  and Manson,  J.W.,  Contamination of
     Oysters by Pesticides,  Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division,
     ASCE,  96_(SA5),  1221-1234,  1970.

24.  Smith,  G. E. ,  and Isom, B. G.  , Investigation of Effects of Large-
     Scale Applications of 2,4-D on Aquatic Fauna and Water Quality,
     Pesticides  Monitoring Jour., _1(3), 16-21,  1967.

25.  Wojtalik, T.A. , Hall, T. F.  and Hill, L. O. ,  Monitoring Ecological
     Conditions  Associated with Wide-Scale Applications  of DMA 2, 4-D
     to Aquatic  Environments,  Pesticide Monitoring J. , 4/4),  184-190,
     1971.

26.  Butler, Philip A., Pesticides in the  Estuary,  Symposium  at
     Louisana State  U. ,  J. D. Newsom, Ed., July 19-20, 1967.

27.  Feltz,  H,  R. , Sayers,  W.  T. and Nicholson, H.  P., National
     Monitoring Program for the Assessment of Pesticide Residues
     in Water,  Pesticide  Monitoring J. , j>(l),  54-62,  1971.

28.  Croker, R. A.  and Wilson, A. J. , Kinetics and Effects of DDT in
     a Tidal Marsh  Ditch, Trans.  Am. Fish. Soc., 94_, 152-159,  1965.

29.  Duke,  Thomas  W. , Estuarine Pesticide Research-Bureau of
     Commercial Fisheries, Gulf and Caribbean Fish. Inst. , 146-153,
     22nd Annual Session, Nov., 1969.

30.  Wilson, Alfred J. , Stability of Pesticides Sea Water,  Bureau of
     Commercial Fisheries, Gulf Breeze, Florida,  Circ. #335, 19-20,
     1969.

31.  Walsh, G.  E. ,  Miller,  C.  W.  and Heitmuller,  P. T. , Uptake and
     Effects of  Dichlobenil in a Small Pond,  Bull. Environ. Contam.
     & Toxicol. , £(3),  279-288, 1971.

32.  Newland, C.  W. , Chesters,  G. and Lee, G. B. ,  Degradation of
     •y-BHC in Simulated  Lake Impoundments as Affected by Aeration,
     J.  Wat. Poll. Contr. Fed.,  4J_(5), R174-R188,  1969.

33.  Lotse,  E. G. ,  Graetz,  D.  A. , Chesters,  G. ,  Lee,  G. B. and
     Newland, L. W., Lindane  Adsorption by Lake Sediments,  Pesticide
     Monitor. J. , 2(5), 353-357,  1968.

34.  Wedemeyer, Gary,  Dechlorination of DDT  by Aerobacter aerogenes,
     Science, 152(3722),  647, 1966.
                               246

-------
                        (References - Continued)

35.   Schwartz, Henry G. ,  Jr. , Microbial Degradation of Pesticides in
     Aqueous Solutions, J.  of Wat.  Poll. Contr.  Fed.   39(10)  1701-
     1714,  1967.                                      ~

36.   Focht, D.D.  and Alexander, M. , DDT Metabolities and Analogs:
     Ring Fission by Hydrogenomonas,  Science,  170, 91-92,  1970.

37.   Miskus, R. P. ,  Blair, D. P. ,  and Casida, J. E. , Conversion to
     DDT and ODD by Bovine Rumen Fluid,  Lake Water,  and  Reduced
     Porphyrins,  J.  Agr.  Food Chem. , J_3, 481-438, 1965.

38.   Rose, F.L. and Mclntire, C.D., Accumulation of Dieldrin by
     Benthic Algae in Laboratory Streams, Hydro.  Biol. , 35(3/4),
     481-493, 1970.

39.   Butler,  Philip A. ,  Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Pesticide
     Monitoring Program,  Proceedings, Gulf and South Atlantic States
     Shellfish Sanitation Research Conference, 1969-

40.   Ferguson,  D. E. ,  Ludke, J. L. and Murphy, G.C. ,  Dynamics of
     Endrin Uptake and Release by Ressistant and Susceptible Strains
     of Mosquitofish,  Trans.  Am.  Fish. Soc. , 9jH4)> 335-344, 1966.

41.   Bender, Michael E. ,  Uptake and Retention of Malathion by th~
     Carp, Progr. Fish Cult. , ^H(3),  155-159,  1969.

42.   Reinbold,  K. A. , Kapoor, I. P. , Childers, W. F. , Bruce,  W. N.
     and Metcalf,  R. L. , Comparative Uptake and Biodegradability of
     DDT and Methoxychlor by Aquatic Organisms,  111.  Natural History
     Survey Bull., J50J6), 405-417,  1971.

43.   Gutenmann, W. H. and Lisk, D. J. , Conversion of 4-(2,  4-DB)
     Herbicide to  2,4-D by Bluegills,  New York Fish and Game J. ,
     12(1), 108-111,  1965.

44.   Wedemeyer,  Gary, Role of Intestinal Microflora in the Degradation
     of DDT by Rainbow Trout,  Life Sciences, _7, 219-223, 1968.
                                                                  14
45.   Gakstatter,  J. H. and Weiss, C.M., The Elimination of DDT-C   ,

     Dieldrin-C14 and Lindane-C14 from Fish Following a Single
     Sublethal Exposure in Aquaria, Trans.  Am. Fish.  Soc.,  9_3(3),
     301-306,  1967.
                              247

-------
                           (References - Continued)

46.  Faust,  S. D. ,  Pollution of the Water Environment by Organic
     Pesticides, Clin. Pharmacol.  Therap., J5, 677,  1964.

47.  Cope,  O. B. ,  Agricultural Chemicals in Fresh-Water Ecological
     Systems, In Research in Pesticides,  Chichister,  C. O. , Editor,
     Academic Press, 115-127, 1965.

48.  Georgacakis,  E. and  Khan, M. A. Q. , Toxicity of Photoisomers  of
     Cyclodiene Insecticide of Freshwater Animals,  Nature,  233,  120-
     121, 1971.

49.  Henderson, G.L. and Crosby, D. G. , The Photodecomposition of
     Dieldrin Residues in Water, Bull, of  Environ.  Contam.  & Toxicol.
     _3, 131-134, 1968.

50.  Khan,  M. A. Q. ,  Rosen,  J. D. , and Sutherland,  D.J.,  Insect
     Metabolism of Photoaldrin and Photodieldrin, Science, 164, 318-
     319, 1969.

51.  Bender, Michael E. ,  The Toxicity of the Hydrolysis  and Breakdown
     Products of Malathion to the Fathead  Minnow (Pimephales promelas,
     Raf. ),  Water  Res.,  Pergamon Press, _3_,  571-582, 1969.

52.  Matsumura, F. , Patil,  K. C. , and Bousch, G. M. , DDT  Metabolized
     by Microorganisms from Lake Michigan,  Nature, 230, 325-326,
     1971.

53.  Hartung,  Rolf and Klingler,  Gwendolyn W. ,  Concentration  of DDT
     by Sedimented Polluting Oils,  Environ. Sci.  &  Tech. , 4_(5), 407-
     410, 1970.

54.  Wedemeyer, Gary,  Biodegradation of Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane:
     Intermediates in Dichlorodiphenylacetic Acid Metabolism of
     Aerobacter aerogenes, Appl. Microbiol. , 1_5_(6),  1494-1495, 1967.

55.  Bloom, S. G. and Menzel, D.  B. , Decay Time of DDT, Science
     173, 213,  1971.
                             248

-------
                           (References - Continued)

 56.  Chau,  A. S. , Rosen,  J. D. and Cochrane,  W. P.,  Synthesis of
     of Known and Suspected Environmental Products  of Heptachlor and
     Chlordene, Bull,  of Environ. Ccntam. &  Toxicol   6(3)  225-
     230, 1971.                                        ~  '

 57.  Leigh, Gerald  M. , Degradation of Selected Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
     Insecticides, J. Wat.  Poll.  Contr. Fed.,  41(11), R450-R460
     1969-                                    —

 58.  Terriere,  L.C.,  Kiigemagi, U. , Gerlach, A. R.  , Borovicka, R. L. ,
     The Persistence of Toxaphene in Lake Water and Its Uptake by
     Aquatic  Plants and Animals,  J.  Agr.  Food Chem. ,  14, 66-69,  1966.

 59.  Werner, A. E.  and Waldichuk, M. W. , Decay of Hexachlorocyclo-
     hexane in Sea Water,  J. Fish. Res. Board of Canada,  _18(2), 287-
     289, 1961.

 60.  Van Valin,  C.C., Andrews, A. K. , and Eller, L. L. , Some Effects
     of Mirex on Two Warm-Water Fishes, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. ,
     .97,  185-196, 1968.

 61.  Nicholson,  H.  Page, Webb,  Hubert J. ,  Lauer, Gerald J. ,  O'Brien,
     Robert E. , Grzenda,  Alfred R. ,  and  Shanklin, Donald W. ,
     Insecticide Contamination in a Farm Pond, Part I-Origin and
     Duration,  Limnol. and Oceanog. , _9,  213-127, 1964.

 62.  Windeguth, D. L. ,  von and Patterson, R.S.,  The Effects of Two
     Organic  Phosphate Insecticides on Segments of the Aquatic Biota,
     Mosquito News, 26(3), 377-380, 1966.

 63.  Aly, O. M.  and Faust, S. D. ,  Studies  on the Fate  of 2, 4-D and Ester
     Derivatives in  Natural Surface Waters,  J. Agr.  Food Chem. ,  12(6),
     541-546, 1964.

 64.  Johnson, J. E. , The Public Health Implications of Widespread Use
     of the Phenoxy Herbicides and Pichloram, BioScience, 21(17),
     899-905, 1971.

65.  Bailey, G.W.,  Thurston,  Jr., A. D. ,  Pope,  Jr., J.D. and Cochrane,
     D. R. ,  The Degradation  Kinetics of an Ester of Silvex and the
     Persistence of Silvex in Water Sediment,  Weed Sci. , JL_8_(3), 413-
     419, 1970.
                              249

-------
                       (References - Continued)


66.  Walker, Charles R. , Endothal Derivatives as Aquatic Herbicides
     in Fishery Habitats,  Weeds,  11. 226-231,  1963.

67.  Plimmer,  J. R. and Hummer, B. E. ,  Photolysis of Amiben, (3-
     Amino-2, 5-Dichlorobenzoic  Acid) and Its Methyl Ester,  J.  Agr.
     Food Chem. ,  J_7(l),  83-85, 1969-

68.  Plimmer,  J. R. , Weed Killers, In Encyclopedia of Chemical
     Technology,  22,  174-220, 1970.

69.  Cope, O. B. ,  McCraren, J. P. , and Eller, L. L. , Effects of
     Dichlorbenil in Two Fishpond Environments, Weed Sci.
     17(2), 158-165, 1969.

70.  Rodgers, Charles A. ,  Uptake and Elimination of Simazine by
     Green Sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus.Raf. ), Weed  Sci. ,  18 (1),
     134-136,  1970."

71.  Stadnyk, L. ,  Campbell. R. S.  and Johnson,  B. T. ,  Pesticide
     Effect on Growth and   C Assimilation in a Freshwater Alga,
     Bull, of Environ.  Comtam. & Toxicol. ,  6_(1), 1-8, 1971.

72.  Chin, Wei-Tsung, Stone, G.M.  and Smith,  A. E. ,  Degradation of
     Carboxin (Vitavax) in Water and Soil,  J.  Agr. Food Chem. , 18(4),
     731-732,  1970.

73.  Loeb, H, A. and Engstrom-Heg. R. , Time Dependent Changes in
     Toxicity of Rotenone Dispersions to Trout, Toxicol.  & Appl.
     Pharm.,  \1_,  605-614,  1970.

74.  Finucane,  J. H. , Antimycin As a Toxicant in a Marine Habitat,
     Trans.  Am.  Fish. Soc. , 98J2), 288-292,  1969-

75.  Wedemeyer, Gary,  Dechlorination of  1,  1, 1 -Trichloro-2, 2-bis
     (p-chlorophenyl) ethane by Aerobacter aerogenes, Appl.  Micro-
     biol. ,  15(3), 569-574,  1967~
                              250

-------
            F.  APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND  LAWS
                    GOVERNING PESTICIDES USE
                           1.   Introduction
         Public concern for the environment has created another area to
challenge the efficiency and effectiveness of our form of legal and administrative
framework.  Among the concerns is adequacy and effectiveness of existing
state  statutes regulating the sale and use of pesticides.  This section
analyzes the applicable laws and  regulations of the eight states in the
southeastern case study area.   The  provisions of the Federal Insecticide.
Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, (FIFRA)  as amended  and the Miller
Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,  as amended ,
provide the foundation  for a comparative approach.  Additional laws
extending beyond the scope of federal statutes have been deemed necessary
in many  of the southeastern states.  These are examined and generate
recommendations for amending the federal pesticides program.
         Pesticides have been regulated  by both federal and state govern-
ments for many years.  When the FIFRA was first enacted in 1947, there
were  relatively few pesticides used on the agricultural croplands.   The
initial objective was threefold:  (1) to protect the farmer by insuring
that the pesticides  marketed would be effective, (2) to assure sufficient
food and fiber supply by controlling pests, and (3) to protect the public
health.   These original purposes remain viable.
         New factors have been introduced which provide an  additional
legislative intent.  Many new agricultural chemicals  have been formulated
marketed and are in use.  Knowledge has been expanded regarding the
effects of pesticides on beneficial and harmful insects.  There is also
an increased awareness within the scientific community regarding the
relationships of man to the ecological system.  These developments
add a  regulatory  requirement or purpose --"to protect the environment"--
under the concept that  each generation is the trustee  of the environment

                                  251

-------
for succeeding generations.  Throughout this section analyses and

assessments are predicated upon these four objectives which also served

as criteria for testing the adequacy of current statutes and regulatory

controls.


                 2.  Scope of  Local Laws and Regulations


         State laws regulating  pesticides fall into three classifications.

These are statutes:


         e Requiring economic poisons  to be registered

         e Governing pesticide application and use controls

         e Providing for the detection of pesticide  residues  on crops.


                            a.   Registration


         Each of the eight states in the southeastern case study area has

enacted laws to regulate the intrastate commerce of economic poisons.

These laws require the manufacturer, dealer or any person  to register

the pesticide with the state department of agriculture or another designated

administrative agency, such as South Carolina's Crop Pest Commission
                                              4
and Kentucky's Agricultural Experiment Station .


         There was a considerable lag in the  time between the passage

in 1947 of the FIFRA regulating interstate commerce of  economic poisons

and the date the last southeastern state had comparable laws.  Table 1

indicates  the date registration laws for economic poisons were passed in

each southeastern state.
                             252

-------
                              TABLE Fl
              Initial Pesticide Law - Southeastern States
  State




Alabama






Florida




Georgia




Kentucky




Mississippi




North Carolina
  Year

Enacted
Registration Laws
                                                   c

  1951    Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act"
  1953   Pesticide Law
  1949   Economic Poisons Act
  1956   Economic Poisons
  1950   Economic Poisons
  1947   Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide Act
South Carolina   1953   Economic Poisons Law
Tennessee
  1951    Insecticide,  Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
                                                                 10
         Four years was the median time required for these states to


enact legislation after the federal statute  was passed.  Amendments to



the federal statute since 1947 have generally required a period of several



years before there were counterpart state laws.




         Most state laws adopted the basic definitions used in the original



FIFRA,  substituting only the names of governmental offices. Where  there



are differences in language the intent in the FIFRA is preserved although



the actual language may be dissimilar.   In 1959, the FIFRA was amended



to expand coverage of the act to include the agricultural chemicals known



as nematocides, defoliants, desiccants and plant growth regulators.


                               5                                  4
Until 1971,  the Alabama statute  and currently the Kentucky statute



have not been amended to add the expanded coverage of the 1959 amendeme



to the FIFRA.   The pre-1971 Alabama law and the current Mississippi



statute8  do not cover, by definition, the  term "device". Mississippi's



statute as amended does include other coverage by adding in their
                               253

-------
definitions the terms "disinfectant",  "bactericide",  and "adjuvant".
These three terms are not found in the registration  statutes of the
other southeastern states nor in the FIFRA.
         The lack of uniformity in the state laws does not significantly
influence whether or not each and every economic poison is registered.
Instead, where there is a difference between state and federal coverage
(regardless  of which is  stronger) a loophole exists which allows  a reduced
level of regulatory protection.  For example,  the FIFRA controls the
registration of devices intended for sale and distribution in interstate
commerce but devices manufactured  in Kentucky solely for intrastate
sale and distribution are technically unregulated.
         There is a high degree of uniformity in the  acts prohibited
by the state  registration statutes.  Basic prohibitions are keyed  to the
commercial and selected consumer protection functions.  Other  typical
prohibitions relate to enforcement and the unauthorized disclosure of
formula information by officials.  Table F2 lists the prohibited functions
or acts  and illustrates the uniformity  among the southeastern states.
         Only two states include  provisions prohibiting persons from
giving a false guaranty in product registration.  Other states  limit
restrictive language on falseness to the relationship between the contents
in the original container and the  label of the original container under the
term, "misbranded".  There are two  regulatory concepts involved.  One
pertains to all matter, material  and documentation submitted in  support
of registering the product and the other to the generally implied
warranty of  all manufacturers that the product  is as stated on its label.
                                254

-------
TABLE F2  BASIC PROHIBITED ACTS -- PESTICIDE REGISTRATION STATUTES
                       SOUTHEASTERN STATES
ACTS PROHIBITED
Distribute an unregis-
tered, adulterated, or
misbranded product
Sell an unregistered,
adulterated, or mis-
branded product
Offer for sale an un-
registered, adulterated
or misbranded product
Deliver for transport
an unregistered,
adulterated, or mis-
branded product
Transport in intra-
state commerce an
unregistered, adul-
terated, or mis-
branded product
Detach a label or an
original container
Alter the label of an
original container
Add substance to an
original container
Take substance from
an original container
Any official to
reveal formula infor-
mation to unauthor-
ized persons
Any person to deny
officials access
to records
Any person to give
a false guarantee
Any person to inter-
fere with the Com-
missioner or his
designee
ALA.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes



FLA.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
GA.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes



KY.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes


Yes
MISS.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes



N.C.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes



S.C.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes


TENN.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
                             255

-------
         This discussion of guaranties is not significant in terms  of

the litigation produced nor administrative activity created.  Rather,

it discloses two aspects of regulatory control which have not been uni-

formily adopted by the southeastern states.  It also considers the

sensitivity of the statutory language to the various controlling concepts.

         There are many situations in which registration of pesticides

are exempted and penalties for violation of the state  statutes are not

applicable.  The provisions  are reasonably uniform  among the south-

eastern states.   These exemptions are:

         • Any carrier while lawfully engaged in transporting economic
           poisons within the state provided that he will permit the
            administrative agency to  copy all records showing the trans-
            actions in and movement  of articles.

         • Public officials of the state and of the federal government
            engaged in the performance of their official duties.

         • The manufacturer or shipper  of an economic poison for
            experimental use only.

         • By other  parties  if  the economic poison is not sold,  and if
            the container is  plainly marked "for experimental use only--
            not to be sold",  etc.

         • Shipments of economic poisons between plants within the
            state.

         These exemptions appear reasonable when examined under the

doctrine of laissez-faire.  On the other hand, when viewed under the

concept of environmental protection they  provide a loophole by not requiring

registration of products used by state and federal public  officials in the

performance of their official duties.  This loophole allows agencies such

as fish and game commissions,  forest service, park service, and the

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to introduce into the environment pesticides
formulated by their personnel for which:
                                256

-------
       o   Composition and quantity are known only to that agency,
       •   Effectiveness in pest control is not subjected to the same
           criteria as commercial items,  and
       e   Toxicological implications are not readily determinable.
       There are significant dissimilarities in the authorities granted
to state administrative agencies for the  enforcement of their respective
pesticide registration statutes.  Table F3 presents an analysis of the
enforcement  authorities granted.
                              TABLE F3
             Enforcement Authorities Granted by Current
                    Pesticide Registration Statutes
State
Alabama (pre-1971)
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Enforcement Authorities Granted
Emercency
Suspension of
Registration
NES
NES
NES
NES
Yes
Yes
NES
NES
Registration
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Stop Sale
Stop Use
Removal
NES
Yes
Yes
Yes
NES
Yes
Yes
Yes
Seizure
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Injunction
NES
Yes
Yes
NES
NES
Yes
NES
Yes
   NES - Not expressly stated

        Most of the administering agencies in the southeastern states
 do not have  authority to invoke the emergency suspension of registration.
 Without such authority the agency may not have the legal power to act
 promptly to protect the public against hazards disclosed by new scientific
 information.  The 1971 Alabama  Law11 did not grant emergency suspension
 authority to the  Commissioner of Agriculture.
                                257

-------
         Mississippi's agencies have no authority to stop sale of



products found in violation nor do these agencies have authority to


obtain injunctions.   Prior to the 1971 act Alabama's Commissioner of



Agriculture could not issue a "stop sale order" nor obtain an injunction.



Such authorities are important.  Their absence has been the reason



why state and federal enforcement officials have  not always been



able to cooperate fully.   The FIFRA gives  the Agricultural Research


Service  (now Environmental Protection Agency's Pesticide Office) no



authority to issue stop sale orders.  Federal enforcement officials have


frequently requested state officials to use their stop sale authority to


assist in a federal enforcement action.  Cooperation has been good but


on some occasions  cooperation could not be  obtained because the action


sought by the federal enforcement officials was not in violation of the


state statutes.  Detailed records  on the cooperative effort are not


available, but  the magnitude of federal enforcement activities in the


southeastern states is shown in Table F4. ^




          There has  been a significant increase in federal enforcement


activities since 1969.   A 250 percent increase  occurred in seizure


actions from  1969 to 1970.   Likewise a 285 percent increase in recalls


occurred over the same period.   For 1971 actions are at an even


higher rate.   This surge in federal enforcement  activities coincides  with


the timing of Congressional hearings concerning  deficiencies in the


administration of FIFRA.



                                                     13
         The North  Carolina Pesticide Report for 1970   contains


selected enforcement  statistics.  The following enforcement data are


shown:





       Total number of inspections made            1743


       Total number of "Stop Sale Orders" issued     315


       Total number of "Stop Sale Orders" resulting

         from failure to register                      230
                                 258

-------
                         TABLE F-4
            FEDERAL  ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
                SOUTHEASTERN STATES12
Year
and
Month
1969
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Citations
Shipper
Located in
Region IV

3
1
7
20
18
10
23
9
39
14
11
14
Total 169
1970
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

31
15
28
8
20
13
13
10
1
11
9
28
Total 187
1971
January
February
March
April
May
June
July

16
22
20
11
24
18
26
Consignee
Located in
Region IV

8
1
5
15
20
.8
Z3
14
28
14
17
19
172 = 341

21
17
23
11
15
12
11
11
4
11
10
18
164 = 351

13
25
21
8
30
21
26
Seizures

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
(0
2

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
1
1
0

-------
          It is significant that among the 1970 pesticide enforcement

 activities in North Carolina,  18 percent of the inspections made resulted

 in the use of "stop sale orders".  This is an enforcement authority which

 Federal officials do not possess.  Of  the "stop sale orders" issued,  73

 percent were for failure to register.  This high incidence of failure to

 register and the substantial percent of inspections  requiring the issuance

 of "stop sale orders" indicates that North Carolina relies heavily on this

 provision of its law.

       The penalty provisions for violation of the registration statutes

 of the southeastern states  are lenient.   Table F5 summarizes the

 statutory provisions on penalties.
                              TABLE F5
                 Penalties for Violating Provisions of
                        Economic Poisons Law
  State
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
Type Offense

Misdemeanor

Misdemeanor



Misdemeanor



Misdemeanor

Misdemeanor
North Carolina   Misdemeanor
South Carolina   Misdemeanor
Tennessee
Misdemeanor
         260
       Penalty (First Offense)

Punished as prescribed by law

Fine of $100 or $500 or imprison-
ment from 10 to 30 days based on
provision violated

Fine not less  than $100 and not more
than $1000, or six months imprison-
ment,  or both
Fine not less than $25 nor more than
$500
Fine not more than $500, or im-
prisonment for not more than one year,
or both based on the provision violated

Fine not less than $100, nor more than
$1000, or imprisonment for not  more
than 60 days  or  both

Fine of not more than $100, or im-
prisonment for not more than  30 days,
or both

Punished at the  discretion of the
court

-------
         There is a high degree of uniformity between the provisions


 in the registration statutes of the southeastern states and the provisions


 included in FIFRA.  Penalty provisions of the FIFRA--misdemeanor


 with first offense conviction subject to fine or not more  than $500,


 or  imprisonment for not more than one year,  or both fine and imprison-


 ment--are  somewhat stronger than the penalties shown in Table F5.


                                14.15,16
         Many of the regulations  issued for  the administration


 of FIFRA are similar  in scope of coverage to the  type regulations

                  17            18            19
 issued by Florida  ,  Tennessee  and Georgia  .   The Mississippi

            20
 regulations  are not as complete as  FIFRA regulations.   The regulations

            21                22                     23
 in Alabama  ,  North Carolina  and in South Carolina  are limited to


 one printed page.  Kentucky has no regulations and considers  their statute

                                                 24
 sufficiently clear so as not to require regulations  .   None of the  south-


 eastern states has found it necessary to issue interpretations  of its

                                         25-44
 regulations similar to the interpretations     issued by  the Agricultural


 Research Service on the FIFRA regulations.



       The  primary reason for the large number  of interpretations at


the  federal level is the volume of registrations handled.  In processing


a large  volume the incidence rate of registration cases requiring


clarification on a particular point is likely to  be higher than when the


volume  is small.  Administratively these clarifications are handled at


the federal level by promulgating interpretations for general distribution.


At the state level the volume of registrations  is substantially less and


clarifications  are handled administratively on a case-by-case basis.
                               261

-------
                 b.  Application and Use Controls

       The laws used to regulate the application and use of pesticides
                               45
generally fall into three classes  • These are laws:

       «   Requiring the examination and licensing of persons engaged
           in the business  of applying pesticides (custom applicators).

       0   Regulating persons  in professions concerned with the use or
           application of pesticides; e. g. entomologists,  horticulturists,
           plant pathologists, tree surgeons, etc.

       o   Prohibiting the  use  of certain pesticides, or requiring the
           purchaser to obtain a permit before purchasing or using
           highly toxic pesticides,  or requiring dealers in restricted
           use pesticides to be licensed, or any combination of these
           provisions.

       In keeping with the scope of this study,  a fourth class of application

  and use  laws  known as structural pest control laws has been intentionally

  omitted.  These regulate entomological or pest control or eradication

  work in  household  structures, commercial buildings,  or other structures
  where pesticides are employed.

       The oldest major area of application and use control in  the case

  study area is the regulation of custom or  aerial application of pesticides.

  Such regulatory control is used by only four of the southeastern states.

  North Carolina's law   and regulations  came into being in 1953.
                 48                                      49 50
  Tennessee's law   is dated 1965.   Mississippi's two laws  with
                          51 52
  accompanying regulations were enacted and published  in 1966.
  Kentucky does not  have a separate statute but exercises control by

  regulation of  aerial applicators through the Kentucky Department of

  Aeronautics  .  This  regulation was promulgated in 1954.
                              262

-------
      An analysis of the National Transportation Safety Board's aerial
                           54-58
application accident records for the period 1964-68 disclosed
that generally there were fewer accidents  in those four southeastern
states controlling custom application than in the four states without
this class of law.   Table F6 shows the southeastern trend in aerial
application accidents.  The findings in 1968 by Reich and Berner
                                                  59
reflects a similar trend for the southeastern states  .  The use pattern
for aerial applications versus vehicular  or manual application by state
is unknown.  The cotton crop in Mississippi is more susceptible to
aerial application than the  tobacco  crop  in Kentucky so the frequency
factor of usage is reflected in the accident statistics.
      The period covered by Table  F6 was a period of increased use of
aircraft.  The regional accident total as a percent of the national total
has remained fairly even since 1964.  Table F7 indicates the kinds of
operations in which the aerial applicators  involved in the accidents were
engaged.  It is obvious that the majority of the accidents occurred
while the applicator was engaged in dusting and spraying crops.  Tables
F8 and F9  show that the aerial application accidents are  concentrated among
the pilots whose ages  fell in the 25-39 year bracket and with pilots having
more than 1000 hours  flying experience.
      The information in Tables F7 through F9  suggests  that the most common
kinds of aerial application operations involving  pesticides were being
performed by experienced and  mature pilots.  At this point a separate
investigation was initiated to ascertain the need for provisions  in aerial
application laws to protect  the  pilot against the  toxicological effects of
pesticides.   In addition to the  risk of accident associated with flying there
is also present the hazard  of contact with  the pesticide chemicals.
Tables F10,  Fll  and F12 provide information on chemical types and the
seriousness  of toxicological effects and  accident injuries on pilots
engaged in aerial applications.
                              263

-------
                                                       TABLE F6
                                 Aerial Application Accidents - Southeastern Region
                                            Analysis by State 1964-6854"58
^^ State
Year N.

1964

1965


1966

1967
1968

Five Year
j Total
State Five
Year Total
As Percent
Of Regional
Total

JS
<3

12

10


4

11
11

48


15.0



«j
O

18

15


15

17
16

81


25.3



nj
, — (
tn

18

13


10

14
6

61


19.0



•J'-

1

1


2

3
0




2. 1



•JJ-
CO
U)
•r-J
•^

14

15


8

16
14

67


20.9



U

10

2
—

1

4
3

20


6.3



u
w

,4.

5


9

2
,
D

26


8. 1



•Jr
H

1

2


1

3
3

10


3. 1



Regional
Total

78

63


50

70
59

320


:


*
»
National
Total

388

341


323

405
369

1862






Region as
Percent of
National

20. 10

18.47


15.47

17.28
15.98

17.52 !
1
i





ro
             *  States controlling aerial applicators

-------
                    TABLE F7
Aerial Application Accidents  by Kinds of Operations
         Southeastern Region 1964-6854"58
Kinds of
Operations
Dusting Crops
Dusting Other
Seeding Crops
Fertilizing (Dust)
Fertilizing (Liquid)
Defoliation (Dust)
Defoliation (Liquid)
Spraying Crops
Spraying Forest
Spraying Towns
Other
Unknown/Not Reported
Number of Accidents
1964
25
0
0
3
0
2
7
33
1
0
4
3
1965
17
0
0
5
0
1
4
30
0
1
2
3
1966
16
0
0
1
0
2
5
20
0
0
4
2
1967
15
1
2
6
0
0
2
28
2
1
2
11
1968
13
0
0
3
1
1
2
33
0
1
5
0
5 Year
Total
86
1
2
18
1
6
20
144
3
3
17
19
                      265

-------
                   TABLE F8

    Pilot Age  in Aerial Application Accidents
        Southeastern Region 1964-6854"58
Pilot Age
Less than 20 years
20 years but less than 25 years
25 years but less than 40 years
40 years but less than 50 years
50 years or over
Unknown
Number of Accidents
1964
0
7
45
16
7
3
1965
0
6
34
18
5
0
1966
1
6
21
16
6
0
1967
0
9
43
14
2
2
19681
1
4
38
14
2
0
                   TABLE F9

Pilot Experience in Aerial Application Accidents
        Southeastern Region 1964-6854'58
Number of Pilot Flying Hours
Less than 250 hours
250 hours but less than 500 hours
500 hours but less than 1000 hours
1000 hours but less than 2500 hours
2500 hours but less than 5000 hours
5000 hours or over
Jnknown
Number of Accidents
1964
3
4
10
17
12
26
6
1965
0
9
7
15
12
19
1
1966
1
3
8
10
8
20
0
1967
2
9
8
19
13
17
2
1968
0
5
5
19
7
18
5
                      266

-------
                              TABLE F10

        Aerial Application Accidents by Type of Chemical Used
                   Southeastern Region 1964-6854~58
Types of
Chemical Used
Dry Chemical, Toxic
Dry Chemical, Nontoxic
Liquid Chemical, Toxic
Liquid Chemical, Nontoxic
Unknown/Not Reported
Number of Accidents
1964
16
18
26
13
5
1965
11
12
31
4
5
1966
12
5
22
8
3
1967
13
12
27
6
12
1968
10
7
27
10
5
                              TABLE Fll

        Aerial Application Accidents by Toxic Effect on Pilots
                   Southeastern Region 1964-6854'58
Toxic Effect
on Pilot
Not Affected
Affected in Flight
Affected Prior to Flight
Unknown/Not Reported
Number of Accidents
1964
50
0
0
28
1965
36
0
0
27
1966
28
0
0
22
1967
42
0
0
28
1968
34
0
0
25
        Most of the aircraft involved in aerial application accidents were

rigged with spray tanks containing toxic liquid chemicals (Table F10).  The

Table Fll suggests that the chemical hazard is not a threat to pilot

health,  although the number of accidents in which  this type data  was

unknown or not reported is sufficient that such an observation  is only con-

jectural. Injuries statistics directly attributable to the accidents  reflect

that  76% of the pilot injuries were classed as minor or were  not  reported,

12%  involved pilot fatalities and another 12% resulted in  serious  pilot

injury.

                                    267

-------
                           TABLE F12
     Aerial Application Accidents by Pilot Injury Seriousness

                Southeastern Region 1964-6854'58
Pilot Injury
Seriousnes s
Fatility
Serious
Minor/Not Reported
Total
Number of Accidents
1964
6
10
6_2_
78
1965
8
6
47
63
1966
6
5
3_9
50
1967
8
6
56_
70
1968
9
10
40
59
       There are  considerable differences among the four southeastern


states which regulate aerial applicators as to the  scope and detailed

coverage  included in the regulations implementing aerial applicator type

laws.  All four states  (Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee)
                                                           51, 52, 53,60
have regulations  on the requirements for  obtaining a license.

These requirements typically include a provision for an examination

of the applicant by a board to determine the applicant's ability and


 knowledge to perform within limits and standards.  These  regulations

 typically include  information on requirements pertaining to license fees,

 revocation,  suspension,  financial responsibility and penalties for violation.


        The laws and regulations of the State of Mississippi provide the

most comprehensive controls of these four  states.   Their structure

consists  of an agricultural aviation licensing act with regulations

administered by the Agricultural Aviation Board,  and an act regulating

the application of hormone-type herbicides by aircraft with its regulations.

The latter is administered by the Commissioner of Agriculture

through his agent,the State Entomologist.  Both acts contain provisions

linking the responsibilities of the two administering agencies.

 The aspects of the aircraft,  aircraft equipment,  materials used

and methods of application are within the purview of one of the agencies.
                                   268

-------
       Despite what appears to be adequate statutory authority, none of

the four states controlling aerial applicators  has promulgated a com-

plete set of environmentally-sensitive regulations.  Environmental

factors which are not generally covered in present regulations are:


       o   Particle size (Mississippi regulations cover nozzle size
           and PSI),


       o   Formulation (dust and spray),


           (a)  viscosity additives

           (b)  foam

           (c)  encapsulation


       o   Weather at the time  of application (there are state exceptions

           on this factor).


       Another class of application and use laws are  those designed to

control the time and condition of  sale, the distribution and the use of
                            61,62
particular  pesticide chemicals.   Also included in this class  of laws are

other provisions for the handling, storage and disposal of pesticides,

control of unused pesticides and contaminated containers.  The Council

of State Governments' 1971  suggested State Legislation, Volume XXX
                                                 63
contains a  Model Pesticide Use and Application Act  ,   Another

model statute, the State Pesticide Use and Applications Act,  was pre-
                                         64
pared in 1969 by the Public  Health Service -


       Application and use  laws  have been enacted in Alabama, Florida,

Kentucky and North Carolina.  The Florida Pesticide Law on economic

poison registration was amended in 1969 to grant authority to the

Commissioner  of Agriculture to  establish rules and regulations to

designate chemicals as  "restricted pesticides". In 1970 Kentucky passed

an act relating  to the restriction of the use of DDT for pest  control.  This

act prohibits  the use of DDT on agricultural croplands by prescription.

New laws were passed in the 1971 legislative sessions in Alabama and

North Carolina in September and July respectively.   These  laws  repealed

the earlier economic poison laws, made new pesticide acts  incorporating



                                  269

-------
registration of economic poisons essentially as before, created a


Pesticide Advisory Board  or Committee with  membership including


conservation interest, and established a new chemical category entitled


"restricted use" pesticide.   The regulatory trend in the three states with


restricted pesticides laws is to require the licensing of dealers who are


to sell restricted use pesticides and to require use permits for persons


to purchase and use restricted pesticides.


        The State of Florida in 1970 further amended their basic pesticide


law to provide coverage in an area of environmental concern--the per-


sistency of the pesticide chemical in the environment.  The  Florida


statute defines a "persistent pesticide" as one which will persist in the


environment beyond one year from date  of application.  It makes it unlaw-


ful to broadcast persistent  pesticides except  under specified conditions.


 The regulations implementing this act contain the names of  a dozen


chemicals designated as persistent pesticides.   The new 1971 North

             65
Carolina law  permits the Pesticide Board to designate a pesticide


after  a public hearing, as a "restricted-use pesticide" either because


of its persistence, its toxicity or  by other criteria.  These  new provisions


demonstrate recognition by legislatures of the public concern regarding


misuse and misapplication of pesticides and their environmental impact.



                      c.   Residue Detection



        The state food, drug and cosmetic acts or equivalents follow the
                  66-73

federal act closely.   Food residues and tolerances  established by the


Food and Drug Administration under the Miller amendment  of 1959 are


immediately accepted and promulgated by states for intrastate regulation


of produce and feed.   States do not attempt  to establish these type  standards


through their research and  regulatory organizations. A comprehensive


discussion of tolerances  and residue detection was prepared and published


in 1968 by the Food and Drug Administration.
                                  270

-------
              3.  Effectiveness of Current Local Statutes
       There are no established criteria for the evaluation of statutes
for effectiveness.  For  the purposes of this study four factors have been
isolated as indicators of the effectiveness.   These are:
       »    Adequacy of statutory authority to control areas of potential
            abuse of public health and the environment,
       »    Relative economic burden imposed on the private sector by
            the statutes to achieve  compliance,
       •    Relative ease of public administration,  and
       •    Ecological sensitivity of present statutes.
       The present registration laws for economic poisons are generally
adequate to achieve an inventory-type control of pesticide  chemicals.
These laws also serve the purpose of insuring that  the farmer who is not
skilled in chemical formulation receives a product  approved by govern-
ment.  This kind of consumer protection is essential to prevent
false gurantees and misleading or false advertising.  The requirement  for
specific  testing to determine  effectiveness is beyond  the scope of the
 average individual.  This places the determinations of efficacy, toxicological
 significance, residual amounts on agricultural crops  and tolerance level
 solely and properly within the purview of the institutions  of government.
       Table  F4 indicates federal enforcement actions in the southeastern
states citing all types of violations,  including labeling and  failure to
register.  These citations average  only about 31 per month for the eight
states, or approximately four citations per state per  month.  This low
level of enforcement activity is  one  indicator that the  provisions of the
registration statutes are generally under compliance.  State-level
enforcement actions are also at a low level.  Alabama's statistics
                                 271

-------
indicate no seizures, approximately 75 "stop-sale orders" and approxi-


mately 1 50 administrative citations or notices annually.   North


Carolina's 1970 "stop-sale orders" amounted to 315.




       A  cooperative spirit exists between the agricultural chemicals


industry and federal and state enforcement officials.   This  cooperation


is evidenced by the small number of enforcement actions which reach


the seizure category in the application of regulatory authority granted  to



the administering agencies.


       The statutes and regulations pertaining to label requirements


for economic poisons are generally adequate.   In making this judge-


ment observations of the report of the General Accounting Office and


a part of the 1969 Congressional hearings,    the Committee on Govern-

                                  7 "7
mental Operations eleventh report,   the House of Representatives


hearings'° and the Senate hearings'^ each were considered.  Such a


judgement does  not mean that administrative mistakes have not been


made. Rather it means that as a whole the labeling requirements of


the state statutes, which closely follow  those of the FIFRA, are satis-


factory to warn and caution users of hazards.




       There is evidence, however, labeling may not by itself be


sufficient warning when the age of individuals who come  in contact with


pesticides is considered.  Table F13 disclosed that nationwide pesticides



ingestion  accounts for approximately 5. 6% of the accidental ingestions


of children under five years  of age and this statistic includes only those


cases reported by poison control centers to the  National Clearinghouse.




       Table F14 provides a  tabulation of the accidental pesticides


ingestions by children in the southeastern states under 5 years of age


for a three and one-half year period.   The incident rate in the State of


Florida appears disproportionate.  This is probably because  of the sub-


stantially higher number of reporting poison control centers  in Florida



than in the other states.  Florida in 1971 has  32 centers  listed in the


directory to South Carolina's two centers and Kentucky's six centers.





                                 272

-------
                     TABLE F13

          Accidental Pesticide  Ingestions by
           Children Under 5 Years  of Age
 Reported by All Poison Control Centers 1965-6980' 81
Year
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
Total No. of Cases
All Substances
63, 352
64,634
72,661
71, 563
76, 155
Number of
Pesticide,
Cases
3,856
3, 715
4, 087
3,965
3, 952
Pesticide Cases
As a % of Total
6.1
5.8
5.6
5. 5
5.2
Source: Food and Drug Administration
                     TABLE F14

     Accidental Pesticide Ingestion by Children
      Under 5 Years of Age Southeastern States
Reported by Poison Control Centers  1968,  1969,  1970
             and First Six Months 197182

1968
1969
1970
1971 (1st 6 mos.)
3 1/2 yr. Average
Source: Food and
Number of Accidental Ingestions Children Under 5 Yrs.
Ala.
19
24
13
4
17
Fla.
377
254
192
104
265
Ga.
61
43
57
28
54
Ky.
7
13
12
2
9
Miss.
25
29
13
5
21
N. C.
77
69
82
32
74
S. C.
59
19
16
3
27
Tenn.
96
114
94
44
99
Drug Administration
                           273

-------
        The actual number of accidental pesticide ingestions occurring


 is suspected to be much higher than the national or individual state


 figures indicate.  In 1969 a  survey of South Carolina physicians was


 conducted. 83  Of 1157 queried, 667 reported they had seen 572 cases


 of pesticide poisoning during the  year  ending July 1969.  The records


 of the National Clearinghouse for Poison Control Centers indicate only


 26 cases  were reported for  the calendar year 1969 and 72 cases for

                                                             O A
 1968.  A  similar survey was again conducted in South Carolina0^ for


 the year ending July 1971 and a total of 624 pesticide poisoning cases


 were seen by physicians.


        There  is an absence of a completely  reliable national reporting


 system of the  number of accidental ingestions of pesticide by children


 under five years of age.  However, the high incidence of such events


 suggests  that present packaging methods for pesticides may be creating


 a condition in  the home which is unsafe for  small children.  The state


 registration statutes do not  grant authority to the administering agency


 to regulate product packaging.


        Since application and use  statutes are only found in four of the


 eight southeastern states and these statutes are relatively new,  their


 adequacy cannot be assessed with the same  completeness as the long-


 standing registration statutes.  For example, the Kentucky act relates


 only to one of the organochlorine  pesticides, DDT.  There are  many


 other pesticides of related  chemical composition.  This and similar


 statutes are  deficient since  they fail to provide adequate  controls for the


 range of products in a  class and regulate only a single product  within


 the class.


        Amendments to the  registration statute in Florida provide  the


 statutory authority for application and use regulation.  These amend-


 ments commencing in 1969 are the  oldest of this class of law in the  case


 study area.  Authorities  granted to the Commissioner of Agriculture


 delegate responsibility for the classification of highly toxic and persistent


pesticides.  These authorities also establish licensing of dealers and user


                                 274

-------
permit requirements for restricted and persistent pesticides.  The new
Alabama and North Carolina laws provide similar authorities.  The
significant difference  in the application and use laws of these states is
that the North Carolina law°5  calls for the licensing of ground equip-
ment used in pesticide application.  As such, it is more extensive in
coverage  than the laws of Alabama and Florida.
       There is a hazard in writing laws with extensive regulatory
coverage. Unless adequate funding provisions for administration and
enforcement is assured,  the law cannot be rendered effective.  It is
estimated that there are  30, 000 pieces of ground  application equipment
in North Carolina but the 1971 legislative session did not appropriate
adequate  funds to permit staffing for  ground equipment inspection.
       The key economic significance associated with the state registra-
tion statutes in the southeast is  threefold.  First, the burden on chemical
formulators  in terms  of  registration  fees is nominal.  Table F15 indicates
the statutory or regulatory annual license and fee requirements in the
eight  states of the case study  area.
       Second,  none of the southeastern  states has  required of
manufacturers and formulators  any specialized labeling, or unique
requirements for information to be supplied as a  part of the registration.
The requirements imposed on manufacturers and formulators are
essentially those imposed by FIFRA.   In fact, many of the laws authorize
the state  administering agency to accept  the FIFRA registration without
protest.
       Third, the type of agricultural crops and acreage involved  in
the southeastern states is such that without pesticide chemicals the
farmer would not be able to achieve the production levels currently
being attained.  A comprehensive discussion of the  economic consequences
of restricting the use  pesticides is beyond the purview of this study and
is adequately treated in a U.S.D.A.  symposium^The impact on
                                275

-------
                                                     TABLE  F1.5

                         Statutory or Regulatory Annual License and Fees Requirements for
                         Pesticide Products and Applicator,  Dealers and Consultant Services
                                                Southeastern States
^X. Type of
^xL-icense &
^x.Fee
State ^\^^
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky

Mississippi

North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Registration
Fee
Each Brand
$15
$10
$5 up to $200 annual
$5 ea up to $50 annual

$15 up to 10 then $5

$25
$20 ea up to 10, $10 ea add'l
$10 up to 10, $5 ea add'l
Dealers
License
NSC
NES
NSC
NSC

NSC

$25
NSC
NSC
Pesticide
Applications
License
NSC
NES
NSC
Aerial-$25

Aerial-DA

$25
NSC
$10
Pest
Control
Consultant
License
NSC
NSC
NSC
NSC

NSC

$25
NSC
NSC
Each
Aircraft
License
NSC
NSC
NSC
NSC

Up to $50

$10
NSC
NES
Each Piece
Ground
Equipment ;
License
NSC
NSC
NSC
i
i
NSC
\
NSC

$5
NSC
NSC
ro
^j
en
        DA   -  Determined annually
        NSC  -  No statutory coverage
        NES  -  Not expressly stated

-------
cotton, corn, peanuts and tobacco have been studied by the Economic
Research Service of the U. S.  Department of Agriculture.86  These are
principal crops in the case study  area.

         The administration and enforcement of the state registration
statutes is being accomplished in the southeast without any apparent
difficulty. State chemists and pesticide laboratories have borne a significant
part of the total federal-state effort.  Most of the administering agencies
and laboratories are operated with a modest staff.  The  level of staffing
of inspection personnel likewise has been modest.

         The introduction of application and use statutes tends to increase
the  administrative burden because of the inherent requirement to process
large numbers  of dealer licenses  and use permit applications. Currently
Florida has  issued approximately 1400 licenses to dealers and 12, 000 user
permits.  They needed four additional  inspectors for the  restricted and
persistent pesticide administration.  Another four are to be  added when the
law licensing of applicators is enacted.  Adjustments were made in territory
size to be covered by a single inspector,  and some responsibilities were
                                                         87
realigned.  Forty-two persons are engaged as inspectors.

         Ecological accidents in the southeast investigated by the En-
vironmental Protection Agency (formerly Agricultural Research Service)
staff for the years  1967 through October 1971 have involved injury  to
humans, animals and plants. Table F16 presents the number of investi-
                , 88
gations  conducted.
                              277

-------
                              TABLE F16

                   Ecological Accident Investigations
                         1967  - October  197188
State/Region
National
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
SE Regional Total
National Total
SE as % of National
Number of Investigations
1967
-
7
5
-

1968
3
5
4
-
5
5 i 3
•
t
3 1
-
20
95
21.1% ;
1969
6
4
2
-
2
3
2
1970
4
12
5
2
-
28
6
1 5
22 20 62
131
16.8%
118
16.9%
197
31.5%,
(10 mos)
1971
4
16
17
1
3
10
4
2
57
203
28. 1%
5 Year
Total
17
44
33
3
10
49
16
9
181 j
744 1
24. 3% !
Source:  Environmental Protection Agency
                               278

-------
    Of the 744 ecological accidents in the southeast 52. 5 percent
involved humans,  39 percent involved animals,  5. 5  percent involved
plants and miscellaneous accidents accounted for 3 percent.   The
miscellaneous category includes such accidents as spills into wells.
    The increased number of investigations  in  1970 and 1971 coincides
with the Congressional hearings on pesticide regulations and greater
public awareness  attributed to news media coverage of major incidents
such as the parathion investigations in North Carolina in 1970.  Many
incidences of ecological accidents involving pesticides are reported
to the national level.  Only the  more serious incidents are investigated.
The staff  available is insufficient to check out each incident reported.
This investigative function should be expanded.
    Current pesticide statutes  rarely consider the need  to protect
the environment.  There is no reference to differentiate between
harmful and beneficial insects, magnification of toxicological components
via the food chain, or beyond the production of food  and fiber  is the need
to recognize other beneficial uses.  To a large extent the void reflects
prior influence of the agarian element in our society and only a recent
awareness of the environmental implications.
    The number of people living on farms has steadily declined.
Correspondingly,  the new application and use statutes include controls
affecting both urban and farm dweller.  For example,  recent  laws
address control of unused pesticides and contaminated containers.
Other provisions are concerned with the handling, storage and disposal
of pesticides.   Recently enacted controls often emphasize environmental
awareness.
                              279

-------
           4.   Assessment of Important Litigation



     There is a relative absence of litigation involving the registration


statutes of the  southeastern states.   The legal reporting services


document no cases for  the region. A telephone survey of  each of the

                                                               89
administering agencies verified that there has been no litigation.


Cases between private  parties are generally settled out-of-court.


There have been no cases of private actions against public agencies

                                                                  90-92
to compel environmental protection despite  a  legal trend elsewhere.


Such actions may occur as consumer knowledge and awareness of the


effects of pesticides increase.



     Three explanations for the absence of litigation are suggested.


The first  is that  manufacturers and formulators have reacted  as


responsible citizens to citations for violation  of statutory  provision


or regulation.  For minor violations most of the statutes do not require


legal citation.  Administrative  citations are used  generally for such


violations.



     The second is that the nature of violations which are occurring


require only a  limited action by the manufacturer or formulator.


Label  violations  are frequently handled by sending dealers new labels.


Discounts to invoices are  given for the  relabeling service.  Violations


involving  variance of active ingredient guarantees are typically handled


by the dealer returning the product to the manufacturer  or formulator.


Then it is re-formulated to bring the levels and strengths  of active


ingredients  in compliance with  the label and registration statements.
                            280

-------
       The third reason is that 100% inspection of labels and laboratory
testing is not performed at either the federal level or in the southeastern
states.  At the federal level approximately 5000-6000 samples are
taken annually for the 30,  000-40, 000 registered products to determine
variance from the registration statements on active and inactive
ingredients.  This equates to federal inspection approximately once
every five years.  In 1970 North Carolina reported 1743 inspections for
its  4854  registered products with the following results:


                Samples analyzed               1074
                Passed                          855
                Deficient                         111
                Excessive ingredient               6
                Misbranded                        1
                Not registered                   134
                           93
South Carolina's 1970 report   indicates that 1139 samples were
analyzed and 133 or 11.69% were found deficient.
       There is litigation  on the application and use laws of two south-
eastern states.  North Carolina has experienced 12 cases where litigation
resulted from the enforcement of its aerial crop-dusting laws.  Briefs
of these cases  are shown in Appendix 	 .   The fundamental issue in
each of these cases was engaging in custom application of pesticides
without a license as required by the 1953 statute.  Litigants involve
three classes of persons:  persons soliciting business for aerial appli-
cators,  pilots operating aircraft engaged in aerial applications, and
owners of aircraft engaged in aerial applications.  Theses cases were
litigated in county courts with no jury involved. Eight of the 12 cases
resulted in guilty pleas by defendants  and  three cases were nol-prossed.
                               281

-------
       One case has  been litigated in Florida challenging the legality of

regulating  application and use in terms  of the persistency of the chemical.

This case, Great Lakes Biochemical Co.,  Inc.,  v. Doyle  Conner, as
                                                  94
Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida  was a civil

action in the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit,  Leon County,

Florida.  The court found that the state erred in failing to register the

plaintiff's products.  The  persistency of phenylmercuric acetate,  was a

fundamental issue in the action. Subsequently,  the Environmental Pro-

tection Agency cancelled registration in October of 1971 of three

products of the Great Lakes Biochemical Co. , Inc. 95  These were

included in the four products Great Lakes  Biochemical sought to register

in the State of Florida.



      Private lawsuits involving implied or expressed warranties of

pesticides and  negligence in the application  of pesticides are few.

Rohrman   cites six  such cases.  These cases raised no  significant

issues not presently  covered by the guarantee provisions in the registration

 statutes,  or the negligence aspects in common law.



                            5.  Conclusions


        The provisions of  registration statutes of the  southeastern states

are quite  similar to the statutory provisions  of the original FIFRA.  All

states have not kept pace  in modifying their statutes  to comply with

changes in the FIFRA in terms of coverage of categories of pesticides.

The states took an excessive amount of time to enact comparable legis-

lation to the FIFRA to regulate intrastate commerce  of pesticides.

Amendments have required several years  before enactment.
                                 282

-------
       It is questionable whether states should be permitted such time



period because of the potential environmental damage which could occur



during the  interim.   It is  similarly doubtful or even logical to expect



states to invest sufficient funds to initiate research on the short and



long-term  impacts on human health and the environment so that effective



and timely legislation can be enacted.   The monitoring activities are



chiefly performed in the states by the state officials, land-grant colleges,



county farm agents,  and water and air pollution authorities.   Because



of their proximity to the physical environment and the agricultural crop-



lands, a fairly effective state surveillance program  of pesticides does



exist with respect to annual registration of pesticides.  This affords



protection  of the farmer,  the food supply, and to a lesser extent, the



protection  of public health.  The present state registration statutes



modeled after the FIFRA  are inadequate to protect the environment,



but their annual registration requirement  exceeds FIFRA requirements.




       There are significant differences in scope of coverage in some



states pesticide laws compared to the coverage of the amended FIFRA.



There are  also considerable differences in the enforcement authorities



granted to  the state administering agencies.  The penalties enacted  for



violations are weak and are not deterrents to violations.  On the other



hand the volume  of litigation does not  indicate that a strong penalty



deterrent is required.




       Two major loopholes exist in the present  registration statutes:



First, the  exemption of officials of state and  federal agencies from



registering products used in their official activities  provides  an opportunity



for the aquatic environment to be subject to pesticide contamination.



This occurs without any possibility of assessing the  type and volume of



chemicals  entering the waters.   Second, the registration statutes do not



provide coverage of an important consumer protection need.  This relates



to the packaging  aspect of pesticide containers to provide for  child safety.
                                  283

-------
        The level of enforcement of the state registration statutes is
comparable to the level of enforcement of the FIFRA.  Federal recall
and seizure actions in the southeastern states have been infrequent and
several states have made liberal use of their authority to issue "stop-
sale orders".  Enforcement cooperation between the state and federal
levels of government has been high.
        Some of the  southeastern states are ahead of the federal govern-
ment in the enactment of pesticide application and use  controls.   Until
recently these controls have been limited to regulation of aerial applicators
in only four of the eight states.  There is no federal statute  governing
aerial applicators despite the fact that the aircraft are regulated by the
Federal Aviation Administration.  The bulk of the current application
and use litigation has been concerned with aerial application licensing.
Aerial  applicators frequently engage in interstate operations which require
separate licensing for each of the states  served.  Farmers needing
an urgent  pesticide application are not prone to investigate whether or
not an applicator is licensed in his state.
        Two information systems used, or which should be used, for
decisions affecting the federal pesticide program are either  woefully
inadequate or warrant some improvement.  Only a small number of the
incidences of pesticide poisonings which  occur are being reported
(alledgely  10-15 percent)  to the National Clearinghouse  for Poison Control
Centers.   This level of reporting is inadequate to base federal or state
policy decisions.  The South Carolina community pesticide surveys for
two separate years would indicate  that the 10-15 percent figure for  the
nation is a reliable estimate of the situation in the southeastern states.
        One aspect of the National Transportation Safety Board's reporting
system on aerial application accidents needs improvement.  This relates
to the toxicological effects on pilots.  The high incidence of  "unknown or
not reported" for this data category limits the usefulness of this system.
This is a crucial consideration which could be used in health research progranr
and pesticide  program policy decisions.

                                 284

-------
       The inclusion in state application and use laws of provisions re-



quiring the  inspection and licensing of ground application equipment is



commendable from the viewpoint of environmental protection.  On the



other hand it is doubtful if an effective enforcement program can be



initiated and operated within the present and anticipated funding con-



straints.  There is also the inherent implication that  this area of  control



and enforcement could create  chaos for  equipment manufacturers  if



each state adopts different inspection standards  for licensing.





       None of the southeastern states have enacted legislation requir-



ing the posting  of signs for fields which  have been treated with pesticides,



The employment of migratory workers often of limited education



throughout the southeast makes any such future practice questionable



unless a  standardized program is established.





       In summary,  the southeastern states registration statutes  are



slightly less adequate than the  FIFRA.   There are some states with



application and use controls offering limited protection of the aquatic



environment.  The pesticide laws and common law principles applicable



to the  use of pesticides do a reasonably  adequate job of protecting



persons  and property from injury.   There is a need for improvement



in the  administration  of present controls.  Present state registration



laws are  inadequate with respect to protection of the environment. On



the whole, envrionmental protection is just  now  being written into the



statutory language of  the southeastern states in the form of application




and use laws.






                         6.  Recommendations
 1.  The Southeastern states must reduce the time required to formulate



pesticide legislation,  enact legislation and implement pesticide programs



as technical advances elucidate the complex interaction between man and



the other factors affecting  the environment.  Alternatives available include



(a) pre-emption of registration and use controls by the federal government,
                                  285

-------
(b) adoption of federal standards for compliance by states under new
federal legislation,  (c) improved education to develop an informed public,
and (d)  combinations of these.
2.  Annual registration of pesticide products as practiced by the states
should be adopted for federal registration thus providing a more frequent
review  of ingredient statements  and the mechanism for readily challenging
efficacy statements as new scientific findings are made  available.   A no-
change  registration form would facilitate administration of annual  regis-
tration  processes.
3.  The national data collection systems supporting the federal pesticide
program should be improved.  The federal government should encourage
legislation at the state and federal levels to make mandatory reporting
by physicians of treatment of pesticide poisonings.  The U.  S. Public
Health Service should promote effective diagnosis and reporting of pesti-
cide poisonings among its physicians and physicians at large.  The
National Transportation Safety Board should cause improved reporting of
the toxicological effects on pilots by requiring  investigation  and re-submission
of future reports where  this data category is improperly completed.  The
Department of Commerce should expand its annual reporting requirements.
Information should be collected from manufacturers and distributors on
the quantity of pesticides shipped as final sales to retailers  or direct to
consumers by county.
4.  The registration procedures on pesticides should include an assess-
ment of packaging adequacy from the viewpoint of child safety.  Partici-
pation by the Office of Consumer Protection, by the  Federal Trade
Commission,  and the Food and Drug Administration might be necessary
to avoid duplicate staffing of qualified specialists.
5.  An Executive Order  should be issued by the President which would
cause all federal agencies introducing pesticide substances into public
waters and onto public lands to file with state water  pollution agencies
the chemicals used,  the amount,  the time of use  and the purpose.  This

                                 286

-------
recommendation accepts the Congressional intent that states  have pri-
mary responsibility for water pollution control.
6.   The federal government should encourage state water pollution control
agencies to issue regulations requiring all state government agencies using
pesticides  in state  waters and on public lands to file similar statements.
7.   The focus of the federal pesticide program should be shifted to provide
incentives  for the states to enact and enforce a high quality state pesticide
program.  Federal standards  on registration, inspection,  and enforcements,
etc. should be established.  States should be provided with federal grant
assistance to operate and administer their pesticide programs which satisfy
the federal standards.   The grants could  cover planning, inspection, labo-
ratory services, enforcement and personnel training similar to  the type
policies being adopted to implement  the Occupational Safety and  Health Act
of 1970.  Reduction of federal inspection and enforcement staffs  could be
accomplished when state programs attain a satisfactory level.  Other
federal programs such as the  Wholesome Meat Inspection Act and the
Atomic Energy Commission's state radiation agency agreements provide
adequate precedent for states  meeting federal standards to manage both
the state and federal program within their geographical boundary.
8.   The FIFRA should be amended to provide for a joint comprehensive
federal-state pesticide program and to grant federal officials authority
to  issue "stop-sale" and "stop-use"  orders.
9.   The investigative function performed  by the Accident Investigation
Section in  the Pesticides Office of the  Environmental Protection Agency
should be expanded.
                                287

-------
                             7.  References

 1.  Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,  (61 Stat
     163;7U.S.C. 135-135K) June 25,  1947.

 2.  Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Miller Amendment,  (Sec.
     404 (d) (2), 68 Stat.  512; 21 U.S.C. 346a (d) (2)),  1959-

 3.  South Carolina Economic Poison Law,  1953.

 4.  Kentucky Economic Poisons  Law,  1956.

 5.  Insecticides, Fungicides, and Other Economic Poisons,  Article
     20, Title 2, Section 337, 1958  Recompiled Code of Alabama,  1951.

 6.  Florida Pesticide  Law, Chapter 487,  1953  (Revised).

 7.  The Georgia  Economic Poisons Act, Georgia Laws 1950, Pg. 390
     and Georgia Laws 1958, Pg.  389,  1949-

 8.  Mississippi Economic Poisons Act, Chapter 509, Senate Bill No.
     2145, Laws of Mississippi, 1971.

 9.  North Carolina Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act of 1947.

10.  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Law (Pesticide Act)
     Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 43,  Chapter  7, Sections 43-701-
     703 as amended,  1951.

11.  Alabama Pesticide Act of 1971.

12.  Gimble, A. F. , Letter, Environmental Protection Agency, Region
     IV, Pesticides Regulation Division, September 17,  1971.

13.  North Carolina Department of Agriculture, North Carolina Pesticide
     Report for 1970.

14.   Regulations for the Enforcement of the Federal Insecticide,
     Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (Title  7,  Ch.  Ill, Pt.  362 of  the
     Code of Federal Regulations), as amended, August 29, 1964.

15.   Joint Regulations  of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary
     of the Treasury for the Enforcement of Section 10 of the Act (Title
     7,  Ch. Ill, Pt.  362 of  the Code  of Federal  Regulations),  October 1,
     1964.
                                    288

-------
16.  Regulations on Advisory Committee and Hearings under the Act
     (Title 7, Ch. Ill, Pt. 364 of the Code of Federal Regulations),
     August 29, 1969.

17.  Rules of the Department of Agriculture (Florida) Chapter 7E-2
     Pesticides, Revised January 23,  1967.

18.  State of Tennessee Department of Agriculture Rules, Regulations,
     Definitions and Standards for Pesticides,  November  1962.

19.  Rules and Regulations for the Enforcement of the Georgia Economic
     Poisons Act, July 1,  1965.

20.  Regulations,  Mississippi Economic Poisons Act of 1950, Revised
     September 9,  1970.

21.  Rules and Regulations for the Enforcement of the Alabama
     Economic Poison Law,  Undated.

22.  North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Rules, Regulations,
     Definitions and Standards, Chapter XXIII, Pesticides,  June 2,  1970.

23.  Pesticide  Fertilizer Regulation (South Carolina),  July  1, 1955.

24.  Huffman,  W. J. , Letter explaining absence of published regulations
     on Kentucky Economic Poison Law, July  1971.

25.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Applicability to
     Pest Control Operators, Interpretation No.  1, FIFRA, May  1965.

26.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Terms, Interpre-
     tation No.  3, FIFRA, November  1964.

27.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Names of Products,
     Interpretation No. 4,  FIFRA, January  1965.

28.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Ingredients,
     Interpretation No. 5,  FIFRA, March  1965.

29.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Net Contents,
     Interpretation No. 6,  FIFRA, February  1965.
                                   289

-------
30.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Direction for
     Use, Interpretation No.  7, FIFRA,  May   1965.

31.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Advertising,
     Interpretation No. 9,  FIFRA, July  1965.

32.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Labels for Large
     Containers, Interpretation No. 10, FIFRA, July  1965.

33.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Guaranty,
     Interpretation No. 11, FIFRA, May  1965.

34.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Analyzing and
     Testing,  Interpretation No.  12, FIFRA, May  1965.

35.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Liquid and
     Pressurized Household Insecticides, Interpretation No. 15, FIFRA,
     November  1964.

36.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Warning, Caution,
     Antidote  Statements,  Interpretation No.  18,  FIFRA, November   1965.

37.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation of Household
     Containers Containing Chlordane, Interpretation No.  19. FIFRA,
     April   1965.

38.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Labeling Claims
     for Hard Water Areas,   Interpretation No.  21,  FIFRA, July  1965.

39.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Registration of
     Thallium Products for Household, Interpretation No.  22,  FIFRA,
     August  1965.

40.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Household
     Insecticides Depositing Chemical Residues,  Interpretation No. 23,
     FIFRA, November  1964.

41.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Claims for Safety
     and Non-Toxicity Labeling,  Interpretation No. 24,  FIFRA,
     September   1965.

42.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Sodium Arsenite
     and Arsenic Trioxide, Interpretation No. 25, FIFRA,  August  1968.
                                290

-------
43.  Agricultural Research Service, Interpretation on Labeling
     Phosphorus Paste Products,  Interpretation No.  26,  FIFRA, March
     1969.

44.  Agricultura1 Research Service, Interpretation on Labeling Using
     "Germ Proof", Interpretation No*.  27,  FIFRA,  September  1969.

45.  Environmental Protection Agency, Office  of Pesticides Programs,
     Digest of State Pesticide  Use and Application Laws,  May   1971.

46.  North Carolina Aerial Crop-Dusting Law,  1953.

47.  North Carolina Rules, Regulations, Definitions and Standards
     Application of Pesticides by Aircraft,  June 22, 1953.

48.  Tennessee Pest Control Act,  1961.

49.  Act Regulating the Application of Hormone-Type Herbicides by Air-
     craft, Chapter 475,  Senate Bill 2135,  Laws of Mississippi 1971,  1971,

50.  Agricultural Aviation Licensing Act of 1966  (Mississippi),  Section
     5011-01 through 5011-15,  Mississippi  Code  of 1942.

51.  Regulations, Mississippi Agricultural Aviation Licensing Act of 1966,
     Amended March 13,  1970.

52.  Regulations Governing the Application  of Hormone-Type Herbicides
     by Aircraft (Mississippi), as amended June 22, 1966.

53.  Regulation of Aerial Applicators,  KAV-5,  Kentucky Department of
     Aeronautics,  1954.

54.  Civil Aeronautics  Board, Briefs of Accidents Involving Aerial
     Application, 1964.

55.  National Transportation Safety Board,  Briefs of Accidents Involving
     Aerial Application Operations,  1965.

56.  National Transportation Safety Board,  Briefs of Accidents Involving
     Aerial Application Operations,  1966.

57.  National Transportation Safety Board,  Briefs of Accidents Involving
     Aerial Application Accidents,  1967.
                              291

-------
58.  National Transportation Safety Board, Briefs of Accidents Involving
     Aerial Application Operations, 1968.

59.  Reich, George A. and Bemer, ^William H. , Aerial Application
     Accidents,  1963 to 1966, Arch*Environ Health,  \1_,  776-784,
     November  1968.

60.  Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Rules and  Regulations
     Governing Pest Control Operators,  1961.

61.  Council of State Governments,  Suggested State Legislation,  Volume
     XXV, Safe Use of Pesticides,  1966.

62.  Rohrman,  Douglas F. , Pesticide Laws and Legal Implications of
     Pesticide Use, An undated publication of the National Communicable
     Disease Center,  Pesticides  Program Training Guide,  approximately
     1967.

63.  Council of State Governments,  Suggested State Legislation,  Model
     Pesticide Use and Application Act,  1971.

64.  U. S.  Department of Health,  Education and Welfare Public Health
     Service, Guide for Drafting  Pesticide  Legislation Model Statute,
     State  Pesticide Use and Application Act, March  1969.

65.  North Carolina Pesticide Law of 1971, Article 52, Chapter 143,
     General Statutes  of North Carolina,  1971.

66.  State  of Alabama, Detection of Pesticide Residues Statute, Title 2,
     Section 337, Code of  Alabama, 1940, 1965.

67.  Florida Department of Agriculture,  Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act,
     1939.

68.  Georgia Food Act,  as amended, March 25,  1968.

69-  Kentucky Food,  Drug and Cosmetic Act, 217. 005 to 217.215,
     217.992,  KRS, I960.

70.  State  of Mississippi,  Mississippi Food Law, 1910.

71.  State  of North Carolina, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (1939 C, 320,
     s.  1), January 1,  1940.
                                  292

-------
72.   South Carolina Department of Agriculture,  Pure Food and Drug
     Law, Chapter 10,  Article  4, S. C.  Code of  Laws 1962, May 3,  1940.

73.   Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Food, Drug and  Cosmetic
     Act and Regulations Including Soda Water Standards and Inhaling
     Glue Act, January  1, 1969.

74.   U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health,
     Education and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration,  The
     Regulation of Pesticides in the United States, March  1968.

75.   Kirkpatrick,  John H. , Alabama Department of Agriculture,
     Unpublished Data on Pesticide  Enforcement,  1971.

76.   Hearings,  Deficiencies in  Administration of Federal Insecticide,
     Fungicide and Rodenticide  Act, Subcommittee of the Committee
     on Government Operations, House  of Representatives, 91st
     Congress,  1st Session, 1969-

77.   Eleventh Report by the Committee  on  Government  Operations,
     Deficiencies in Administration of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide
     and Rodenticide Act, House Report No.  91-637,  1969.

78.   Hearings,  Federal Pesticide Control Act of 1971,  Committee on
     Agriculture,  House of Representatives,  92nd Congress,  1st
     Session, Serial  No. 92-A,  1971.

79-   Hearings,  Federal Environmental  Pesticide Control Act,  Senate
     Subcommittee on Agricultural Research and General Legislation,
     92nd Congress,  1st Session, March 23-26,  1971.

80.   Food and Drug Administration, National Clearinghouse for Poison
     Control Centers, Bulletin, Tabulation of 1968 Reports,  September-
     October   1969.

81.   Food and Drug Administration, National Clearinghouse for Poison
     Control Centers Bulletin,  Tabulation of 1969 Reports, September-
     October   1970.

82.   Food and Drug Administration, National Clearinghouse  Poison
     Control Centers, Unpublished data on pesticide poisonings in
     southeastern states 1968 - 1st  half 1971.

83.   Keil, J. E. , Sandifer,  S. H. , and Gadsden,  R. A. ,  Pesticide
     Morbidity in South  Carolina, The Journal of the South Carolina
     Medical Association, 69-70, March   1971.
                               293

-------
 84.  Keil,  J. E. , et al, Unpublished data on community pesticide study
     in South Carolina furnished by Medical University of South
     Carolina,  1971.

 85.  Economic  Research Service,  U.S.D.A. , Economic Research on
     Pesticides for Policy Decision-making, Proceedings of a
     Symposium,  April 27-29,  1970.

 86.  Economic  Research Service,  U.S.D.A., Economic Consequences
     of Restricting the Use of Organochlorine Insecticides on Cotton,
     Corn,  Peanuts and  Tobacco, March  1970.

 87.  Giglio, Vincent, Unpublished data on Florida staffing experience
     of new pesticide program, 1971.

 88.  Environmental Protection  Agency Pesticides Office, Summary of
     Pesticide Accidents, January 1967-November 1,  1971.

 89-  Teledyne  Brown Engineering, Telephone  survey of Southeastern
     states pesticide program  administrators  on litigation,  August
     1971.

 90.  Grad,  Frank P. and Rockett, Laurie R. , Environmental Litigation-
     Where The Action Is?,  Natural Resources Journal,  10,  No. 4,
     742-762,  1970.

 91.  Anonymous,  Pesticides:  Consumer Fear of 111 Effects Grows,
     Chemical and Engineering News,  16-18,  August 9,  1971.

 92.  Anonymous,  PCB's  Leaks  of Toxic Substances  Raises Issue of
     Effects,  Regulation Science,  173, 899-902, September 3,  1971.

 93.  South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Annual Report of
     Economic Poisons Analysis, July 1,  1969 -  June  30, 1970.

94.   Great Lakes Biochemical Co. , Inc. ,  v. Doyle Connor as
     Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida,  May 21, 1971.

 95.  Environmental Protection  Agency, Cancels  Registration of Three
     Products of Great Lakes Biochemical Co. ,  Inc. ,  I. F. and R.
     Dockets Nos.  14 and 53, October 7,  1971.
                                294

-------
     G.  ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES IN SOUTHEASTERN
                          UNITED STATES
                          1.   Introduction
        Pest management should be predicated on the totality of
 knowledge of all pest control methods and the ecological impact.
 Effective control measures should be those which consider the long
 term ecological and economic aspects.   The indiscriminate use of
 any single control method may produce undesirable and unintended
 side effects.1
        On balance.,  the introduction of chemicals such as pesticides
 to agricultural practice was beneficial.  However,  not all the effects
 are positive.  Problems have arisen, some quite serious,  which
 detract from the benefits. '   This is attributed in a large  measure
 to the disregard of ecological considerations.  Only chemical, toxio-
 logical  and economic criteria were used.  Pest control has
 consequently engendered serious problems through disruptive impact
 on the ecosystem.
        The benefits of pesticides were so evident that alternatives
 were not evaluated with equal vigor.  All practices, whether chemical,
 cultural,  physical, genetic or biological, must bring about  the most
 effective, least ecologically disruptive,  pest control possible.  The
 objective  is to reduce the impact of pesticides upon the aquatic
environment by critically analyzing the  available alternatives.
       Although alternative methods are  sought, it is  generally
conceded  that pesticides will  be  used to control  pests into the
foreseeable future.4  Subsequent to the  discovery of organic pesticides
                             295

-------
in the early forties, major research effort was not devoted to

alternatives.  This accounts for continued and often excessive

reliance on pesticides.

       Methods of control are effective because they either directly

affect the pest species or adversely modify environmental conditions

for its survival (Fig. G-l).  Principles and examples of current and

proposed methods are considered.


              2.  Cultural Methods of Pest Control

       Cultural methods are  routinely utilized in agriculture to
reduce pest problems.   These usually involve adjusting the time or
manner of performing operations for the production of crops  or
animals,  and in improved  management procedures.   Examples of
such cultural methods "~10 and the pest species against which it is
directed are;

       •  Sanitation

          -Destruction of crop  refuse  (boll weevil,  bollworm, corn
           borer)

          -Cleaning of field borders  (weed control)

          -Disposal of wastes (fly control)

       •  Rotations

          -Crop rotation (specific pests for  all crops, diseases,
           fungal  spores,  bacteria, mites, insects and viruses,  eg.
           golden nematodes  of potatoes,  soybean cyst nematodes,
           northern corn rootworm)

          -Animal rotation (cattle tick control)
                            296

-------
  METHODS OF CONTROL
       EFFECT ON PESTS
 INDUCED STERILITY
 GENETIC MANIPULATION
                                              AFFECT  THE  CHARACTERISTICS
                                              OF  THE  SPECIES
ATTRACTANTS & REPELLENTS


INSECT HORMONES


HOST RESISTANCE


BIOLOGICAL AGENTS


PHYSICAL FACTORS


CHEMICAL AGENTS •
 MODIFY ENVIRONMENTAL
 CONDITIONS
QUARANTINES
SEED CERTIFICATION
SEED LAWS
-PREVENT  SPREAD
Source:  Rabb and Guthrie (Modified)1
             FIGURE 6-1.  POSSIBLE METHODS OF PEST CONTROL
                               297

-------
•  Farm Management

   -Land bank and fallowing (cyst nematodes)

   -Strip cropping (alfalfa aphid)

   -Fertilizers (chinch bugs,  weeds)

   -Time of planting (southeastern corn borer,  sugar-beet
    nematode)

   -Pest free seeds and seed certification (weed control,
    wheat nematode control)

   -Destruction of volunteer plants (potato aphids)

   -Destruction of alternate hosts (wheat and apple rusts,
    beet leaf hoppers,  sweet potato weevils)

   -Destruction of early blooms (sorghum midge)

   -Tillage (grape berry moths)

   -Crop spacing (weeds)

   -Cleaning of farm equipment (weed control)

•  Trap crops (citrus red mite)

•  Regulation of plant stands  (citrus pests)

•  Selection of site (various forest insects)

•  Thinning, Topping,  Pruning and Defoliating

   (Tobacco hornworm, mite, and control of dutch elm disease)

•  Water Management

   -Irrigation and flooding, (root knot and white tip
    nematodes)

   -Impoundment and improved pond management (acquatic
    weeds,  mosquitoes, biting midges)

   -Drainage (nematodes)
                          298

-------
       a.  Cultural Control of the Southwestern Corn Borer
        This  southwestern corn borer, Diatrea grandiosella.  is
primarily a pest in the western U. S.   However, it has slowly moved
eastward and is found in western Tennessee and Alabama.11  Cultural
practices which increase exposure of the larvae of this insect to the
environment and to predators are effective in increasing overwintering
mortality.   Burying is not detrimental to the larvae but the moths are
unable to emerge from the soil.  Early-planted corn escapes some
of the damage.  The primary advantage for early  planting is  reduction
in girdling.  Although corn planted in Tennessee before May  1 is  dam-
aged less by girdling in all years and locations, infestation and
lodging are not consistently reduced.  It has been established that
the use of an early maturing hybrid is not an acceptable substitute
for early planting as a means of reducing damage caused by this
borer.
               b.  Cultural Control of Cotton Pests
                          (1) Insect Control
        The pink bollworm provides a classic example of a major
cotton pest controlled by cultural practices. The feature  of the
control program includes  stalk destruction and deep plowing of the
residue after the crop is harvested.  Two factors, namely, over-
wintering as larvae and a single host plant (cotton),  makes it highly
susceptible to this method of control.  Cultural measures in
conjunction with good agronomic practices provide a means by which
the pink bollworm population may be reduced to extremely low levels.
Often damaging populations do not develop the following year.
                              299

-------
       A modification of this approach is quite effective in reducing



boll weevil populations.  The great majority of the dispausing boll



weevils leave the cotton fields for hibernation sites during the harvest



period of late September and October.  Further, the adult requires a



feeding period of 1 to 3 weeks to accumulate sufficient fat reserve to



attain diapause or overwintering stage.  Any practice which eliminates



either food or breeding sites during this critical period will be



detrimental.




       The most important practice that can be effected during the



fall to reduce populations  of diapausing boll weevils is defoliation or



desiccation of the cotton plants.  This eliminates  squares and young



bolls necessary for development of the diapausing population.   The



next most important practice for reducing overwintering populations



is to harvest the crop as  quickly as possible and then destroy the



stalks.




       Attacking the boll weevil and pink bollworm during the fall



of the year is a biologically and operationally sound practice aimed



at destruction of the diapausing population.  Only bollworms that are



in diapause are able to survive the winter.  This is the  weakest link



in its life cycle.  A factor in the  success of this method is that these



two major cotton pests do not develop large populations on wild or



alternate host plants. 2





                  (2) Disease and Nernatode Control




       The principal cotton diseases and their control with cultural



and other control methods are presented in Table G-l.
                              300

-------
    TABLE G-l.   Various  cotton  diseases and  their  control by
                  cultural and other methods.-^
         Name of  Disease  and
           Causal  Organism
         Control
        Measures
      Anthracnose  (the  fungus
       Glomeralla  gossypii).
       (South.)  Edg.
Seed treatment; destruction of
 diseased plant residues;  suit-
 able crop rotations
      Ascochyta,  or  wet
      weather,  blight  (the
      fungus  Ascochyta
      gossypii).  Syd.
Seed treatment; destruction of
 diseased plant residues;  suit-
 able crop rotations
      Bacterial  blight  (the
       bacterium Xanthomonas
       malvacearum).  (E.  F. Smi.)
       Dows.
Seed treatment; use of resistant
 varieties; destruction of
 diseased plant residues
      Fusarium with (the fungus
       Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht.
       f. vasinfectum).  (Atk.)  Snyder
       and  Hansen.
Use of resistant varieties;  suit-
 able rotations; fumigation  to
 reduce nematodes;  addition  of
 humus to soil;  use of fertilizers
 high in potash
     Root-knot  (the nematode
      Meloidogyne  incognita).
      Chitwood.
Fumigation with locally  recommended
 fumigants; suitable  crop  rotations;
 tolerant varieties
     Root rot  (the  fungus Phymato-
      trichum  omnivorum). (Shear)
      Dug.
Fall plowing with  phosphate add-
 itions;  use of  Hubam  clover as
 cover crop; suitable  crop rota-
 tions; heavy applications of
 organic  manures in  irrigated areas
     Seedling diseases  (several
      seedborne and soil-inhabiting
      fungi and bacteria).
Seed treatment;  destruction of
 diseased plant  residues; use of
 bacterial-blight  resistant
 varieties
Verticillium wilt  (the  fungus
 Verticillium  albo-atrum).
 Reinke and Berth.
Use of tolerant varieties;  rotation
 with grain crops in irrigated  areas;
 planting on high beds;  increasing
 of plant population;  avoiding  heavy
 irrigation that lowers  soil  tem-
 peratures for prolonged periods
  Source:   Presley and Bird (Modified),
                                   301

-------
                         (3) Weed Control





       Cultural methods of controlling weeds in cotton are important.



Production practices which promote rapid emergence and growth tend



to control weeds by shading.  Crop rotation or fallowing sometimes



offer another practical solution.  These two practices permit the use



of alternate herbicide on weeds that are difficult to control in any



single crop.  For example, cocklebur is very difficult to control in



cotton fields but relatively easy to control in corn.  Disking or plowing



six to eight times during a single growing season effectively reduces



the number of viable Johnson grass rhizomes present at the beginning



of succeeding growing season.  Plowing or disking every four weeks



for two successive growing seasons has been reported to eradicate



nutsedge essentially.14




       Cultural practices tend to create adverse conditions during



the pest's active or overwintering stage and result in reduced pest



infestation.  Expansion of such agronomic practices together with



integrated control programs could reduce the use  of the pesticides.







        3.  Physical and Mechanical Methods of Pest Control




       Physical and mechanical methods differ from cultural methods



since they are intended specifically to control the pest and are not



routine agricultural practices.  They may either be preventive or



corrective.  Their effectiveness lies in the fact that all biological



species exhibit thresholds of tolerance with regard to extreme



temperature, humidity,  sound,  physical durability and  response to



various regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.  Among  central



approaches,  the possibilities inherent in the spectrum of radiant



energy and devices such as light traps are especially promising.15'16
                            302

-------
       Temperature is utilized in the control of soil-borne diseases
caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi and nematodes.6  Fire has been
found to be an effective method of control of alfalfa weevil,  Hypera
postica.    In many cases stored  seeds are  protected by exposure to
temperatures 4 and 10°C, since most grain infesting insects are
inactive at these temperatures.
      a.  Inactivation of Plant Pathogenic Viruses by Heat in
         Vegetatively Propagated Plant Materials
       Temperature may affect the susceptibility of host plants to
virus infection, the time required for development of symptoms, and
the degree of damage.  The principle may be extended to those cases
where the majority or all of the plants in a  vegetatively propagated
clones are infected.  A summary of viruses (Table G-2) that have
been inactivated in plants by heat illustrates the effectiveness of this
measure.
      b.  Disinfection of Plant Parasitic Nematodes by Heat
       A hot water treatment, alone or together with a nematicidal
dip, is used to treat plants contaminated with ectoparasitic nematodes
such as Hemicycliophora  sp. or Criconemoides sp.  These pests are
difficult to dislodge by mechanical means because their long stylets
are inserted into the plant cells.   Endoparasitic nematodes present
within plant tissues or enclosed within the protective layers of plant
parts require a penetrating chemical or physical agent to effect a
kill.  Heat is most commonly used.   Externally applied heat is
absorbed by the plant propagule and spreads within to reach the
pathogens.  When a differential in heat susceptibility exists between
plant tissue and nematode and the latter is more sensitive, effective
heat treatment is possible.
                               303

-------
TABLE G-2.  List of Viruses that Have Been Inactivated in Plants by Heat
                                                                        18
Virus
Abutilon variegation
Apple mosaic
Aster yellows



Carnation ringspot
Cherry necrotic rusty
mottle
Cherry ringspot
Citrus tristeza
Cranberry false blossom


Cucumber mosaic


Little peach
Peach red suture
Peach rosette
Peach X-disease
(yellow-red virosis)
Peach yellows


Phony peach

Potato leaf roll
Potato witches' broom

Raspberry leaf mottle
Raspberry leaf spot
Raspberry unidentified
latent virus
Raspberry Rubus stunt
Strawberry xeat burn
or X
Strawberry virus 1
(mottle)
Strawberry virus 3
(crinkle)
Strawberry virus 4
(vein chlorosis)
Strawberry virus 2
(mild yellow edge)
Strawberry nonpersis-
tant viruses
Plant
Abutilon striatum
Budded seedlings
Vinca rosea and
Nicotiana rustica
(plants)
Vinca rosea (plants)
Carnation (plants)
Cherry bud sticks

Cherry bud sticks
Potted plants
Cranberry and
Vinca rosea
(plants)
Cucumber, tobacco,
Datura stramonium
(plants)
Peach (bud sticks)
Peach (bud sticks)
Peach (bud sticks)

Peach (bud wood)
Peach (trees)
Peach (dormant
trees)
Peach (dormant
trees)
Potato (tubers)
Vinca rosea (plants)
Potato (tubers)
Raspberry (plants)
Raspberry (plants)

Raspberry (plants)
Raspberry (canes)

Strawberry (plants)

Strawberry (plants)

Strawberry (plants)

Strawberry (plants)

Strawberry (plants)

Strawberry (plants)
Temperature Length of
Treatment (°C.) Treatment
Hot air
Hot air


Hot air
Hot water
Hot air
Hot water

Hot air
Hot air


Hot air


Hot air
Hot water
Hot water
Hot water

Hot water
Hot air

Hot water

Hot water
Hot air
Hot air
Hot air
Hot air
Hot air

Hot air
Hot water

Hot air

Hot air

Hot air

Hot air

Hot air

Hot water
36
37


38-42
40-45
36
50

100
95°F.+3°


42


36
50
50
50

50
35

50

48
37
42
36
32-35
32-35

32-35
45

37

37

37

37

37

43-48
3-4 weeks
28-40 days


2-3 weeks
2 1/2-24 hr.
3-4 weeks
10 min.

17-24 days
121-360 days


8 days


3-4 weeks
3 min.
3 min.
8 min.

6-15 min.
24 days

10 min.

40 min.
15-30 days
13 days
6 days
1-4 weeks
1-4 weeks

1-4 weeks
1 1/2-2 hr.

7-11 days

7-11 days

7-11 days

7-11 days

16 days

1/2-7 hr.
                                   304

-------
TABLE
      G-2   (Continued)
      Virus
       Plant
         Temperature  Length of
Treatment    <°c->    Treatment
Strawberry nonpersis-
 tant viruses
Strawberry type 2
Strawberry viruses  (un-
 identified)
Sugarcane chlorotic
 streak
Sugarcane ratoon stunt
Sugarcane ratoon stunt
Sugarcane sereh disease
Tobacco ringspot
Tomato aspermy

Tomato aspermy
Tomato bushy  stunt
Strawberry (plants)   Hot air

Strawberry (plants)   Hot air
Strawberry (plants)   Hot air

Sugarcane (cuttings)  Hot water

Sugarcane (setts)     Hot water
Sugarcane (cuttings)  Hot water
Sugarcane (cuttings)  Hot water
Tobacco (plants)      Hot air
Tomato and tobacco    Hot air
 (plants)
Chrysanthemum (plants)Hot air
Datura stramonium     Hot air
 (plants)
             36-38    8-12 days
                38
                37

                52

                50
                50
             52-55
                37
                36

                36
                36
8 days
10 days

20 min.

2 hours
20 min.
30 min.
3-4 weeks
3-4 weeks

3-4 weeks
3-4 weeks
 Source:  Carter, W.
                                      305

-------
        A few examples of recommended temperature-time combina-
tions9 found useful for control of parasitic nematodes include:  Easter
lily bulbs with spring crimp nematode,  Aphelenchoides fragariae,
 1 hour at 44°C in a water and formalin bath; citrus rootstock with
borrowing nematode,  Radopholus similis, 10 minutes at 50°C; seed
with bentgrass seedgall nematode, Anguina  agrostis, 15 minutes at
52. 2°C in water  containing a wetting agent;  wheat seed  with wheat
nematode, A_. tritici,  30 minutes at 49°C or 10 minutes at 50°C;
begonia with spring crimp nematode,  treat by submerging pot and
contents for 1 minute at 49°C, 2 minutes at 47.8°C, or 3 minutes
at 46. 8°C; sweet potatoes  with root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne
sp. ,  65 minutes  at 46. 8°C; and grape rootings with root-knot
nematodes, 30 minutes at  47.8°C, 10 minutes at 49°C, 5 minutes at
51.6°C, or 3 minutes at 53°C17'9.
                c.  Use of Light Traps  in Insect Control
        Light traps employing ultraviolet or blacklight lamps are being
used  in experiments to determine their  effectiveness for attracting
moths.    In one  113-square mile area in North Carolina 370 traps
exterminated 50  to 60 percent of the adult tobacco hornworm moths
in one growing season.  A trap density of three per square mile in
combination with stalk cuttings and insecticide treatment to prevent
late season breeding of hornworms, further reduced infestation in
tobacco about 80%.  This reduction was measured in the center of
the test area during the second year.  About 20 times more males
than females were captured.  These results suggest the possibility
of using this means to decrease mating  in the  field.
        Other uses of black-light traps for insect control include the
protection of cabbage from the attack  of the cabbage looper, Tricho-
plusia ni (Hubner), and of celery from the celery looper, Anagrapha
                              306

-------
falcifera  (Kirby) 8.  The deleterious effects of both the European



corn borer and the  cotton bollworm can be significantly reduced by



light traps if population pressure is not extremely high.  Damage to



tomato fruit and foliage resulting from the attack of tobacco and



tomato hornworms  can be minimized8.  The increase in yield of



cucumbers from plants protected by light traps has been especially



encouraging; populations of the striped cucumber beetle and the



spotted cucumber beetle were reduced and the transmission of



bacterial wilt was minimized.  The benefit of the light trap is that it



eliminates the need for chemical applications in those  climatic areas



where light attraction is consistently good.




        Light traps  may be used to attract moths and bring them into



contact with chemosterilants.  They can then be released.  Not all



moths and flying beetles are sufficiently attracted to black-light



sources to affect control.  Further, control over extensive areas is



not feasible.  Recommendation of this approach must be made  within



certain restraints.   The limitations involve need for electrical power



and the presence of pests that are photosensitive.  The advantages are:



no residues on crops; they detect moth emergence and can be used for



timing of control applications; attraction irrespective of the physical



condition of the field; integration with other control approaches (eg.



post season stalk cutting in tobacco)1 6' 19 and low operating  cost.




        Light attraction combined with  chemical attractants is a



promising means of effective pest control.
                              307

-------
             4.  Use of Resistant Varieties of Crop Plants
        Plants or animals that exhibit less damage or infestation by a
pest (disease,  nematode or insect) than others under comparable
conditions in the field are considered to be resistant.  Selection and
improvement results in a resistant variety which becomes an integral
part of the pest management program.  One of the most important
contributions of agricultural programs  of the pre DDT era was the
development of resistant varieties.  This method of reducing pest
damage has been used extensively since the turn of the century.
Originally the case  for natural resistance to plant pests was economic;
it added nothing to the grower's cost of production.   Now, pollution
control is the consideration.
        With alfalfa, small grains and tobacco, it is the availability
of resistant varieties which makes the difference between profit or
loss.   In certain cases it is the  resistance factor that makes culture
of a crop possible.  In the Southeast,  diseases such as stem rot of
peanuts; rusts and smuts of cereals; anthracnose of watermelon;
fusarium wilt, mosaic,  black  shank, and black root rot of tobacco are
only examples of the pathogens which are primarily controlled by
resistant varieties.     At present,  approximately 75 percent of the
total acreage in agriculture production in the United States utilizes
resistant varieties.
       Varietal resistance to insects and other pests  is classified
into three broad categories  (Fig. G-2).
       A classical example of the  use of the plant genetics is the
control of grape phylloxera in Europe over the past 90 years.   Highly
resistant American  varieties saved the  European viticulture. 5   An
                                308

-------
  Preference —
     FOR OVIPOSITION
     FOOD OR SHELTER
   Antibiosis
   ADVERSE EFFECT OF
PLANT ON BIOLOGY OF INSECT
co
o
10
                                Tolerance
                             REPAIR, RECOVERY OR ABILITY
                              TO WITHSTAND INFESTATION
                     Source: Painter, R. H.


                      Fig. G-2.  The Nature and Categories of Pest Resistance.
 20

-------
early search for plants resistant to insects was made in California
over a period of 10 years beginning in 1881.20  By turn of the century,
programs were under way which were directed toward increased
disease resistance through breeding.   Among the better known were
those programs concerned with mildew resistance in grapes in
France; late blight of potato in several European countries; rust
resistance in wheat in Australia,  England and America; and, wilt
resistance in flax, cotton, watermelon and cow pea in United States.
These are still being pursued actively today along with  scores of
others.21'  22   In the 1953 Yearbook of the United States Department
of Agriculture there is a list of sources of resistance in crop plants
which occupies more than 24 pages.  Many of these crops are grown
in the Southeastern states. 3  Each year many new resistant varieties
are added.  Effort is being  directed toward incorporating  multiple
pest resistance into crop varieties.
       The development of all the resistant varieties cannot be
considered within the scope  of this review.  The few cited exemplify
development and use  of host plant resistance  as  one  of the most
effective methods of economic pest management in agricultural
ecosystems.
                     a.  Wilt Resistance in Tobacco
       A bacterial disease known as Granville became a limiting
factor in flue cured tobacco producing counties  in North Carolina
following the turn of the century.  Losses in Granville County during
the period from 1920-40,  one of the key tobacco growing areas, were
estimated at 30-40 million dollars.
                                 310

-------
       Intensive efforts to develop wilt-resistant tobacco were
initiated in 1935.  This effort culminated in the release in 1944 of
a resistant tobacco variety of acceptable quality at a program cost of
about $150, 000.  By  1948,  the value of the tobacco in the area of
Granville was estimated  as $2, 000, 000.  In 1964, 416, 000 acres were
devoted to the tobacco crop in North Carolina and the value placed as
$520, 000, 000.  Approximately 95 percent of this acreage was planted
to varieties which not only incorporated resistance to Granville wilt,
but also to black shank.  If resistant varieties were not available
and only susceptible  varieties were grown,  it is estimated that yield
would be reduced to less than one-fourth.21' 23  These major diseases
involve  soil-borne pathogens. No effective chemical controls would
have  been  available to control these diseases  and the effectiveness or
practicality of other  approaches, including rotation and related
cultural practices, would have been limited.
               b.  Varietal Resistance to Cotton Pests
       Varietal resistance has been generally ignored as a possible
means of controlling cotton pests until recently.  Research initiated to
screen available germplasm  has  proved to be highly rewarding.
       The possibility of controlling Heliothis sp. and other lepidopterous
pests by incorporating high levels of gossypol and other pigments into
commercial varieties appears to be especially, promising.  Plants
having a gossypol content of 1.5 percent or greater would cause both
larval mortality and  inhibition in development of Heliothis larvae.
Such levels have been attained in several lines.
       High gossypol content is undesirable in cotton seed because of
its toxicity to non-ruminant animals.   A considerable amount of effort
has been devoted to incorporating characteristics for low gossypol
                                311

-------
content into commercial varieties.  This provides an excellent example
of the necessity for a cooperative  approach in developing varieties of
cotton.12
        The spread of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis  (Boheman),
throughout the Cotton Belt around  the start of this century  brought
marked changes  in the type of cotton grown.   The late, vigorous,  long-
staple upland varieties were  rapidly replaced by early-maturing,
short-staple types which were less susceptible to damage by the weevil
because of their  shorter exposure period and thicker carpel walls.
These short staple types tended to be inferior in quality; and breeding
efforts were directed toward increased quality and length of staple.
        Knipling estimated that  $75 million was expended annually  for
control of the boll weevil.  In spite  of this expenditure, control was
far from complete and the annual loss  from this  insect was estimated
at $200 million.  Indications  of the weevil developing resistance to
insecticides renewed interest in the  development of resistant types.
The U. S.  Cotton Boll Weevil Research Laboratory was established in
1962 at State  College,  Mississippi,  with the  objective of finding new
approaches to boll weevil control or eradication with less emphasis
on use of insecticides.  In addition to the search for resistance, other
alternative  methods were also examined.
        Extensive studies with cotton have demonstrated that  several
factors contribute significantly to differences in  relative resistance
and susceptibility to boll weevil attack.  Some of these genetic factors
are complex and quantitative  in their inheritance; others are simply
inherited.   Frego bract is conditioned  by a single recessive gene.
In this mutant type, the normally adherent bracts become flared and
twisted, leaving the squares  relative exposed. Studies indicate that
                                312

-------
frego types are less attractive for oviposition (egg laying).  In addition,



the exposed squares permit ready penetration of insecticides and
                                            ;


greater predation by birds and insects.  Other simply inherited traits,



such as, red leaf and  smooth leaf, contribute to  reduce oviposition.



Combinations between certain of these traits appear to exhibit increased


non-preference.





       A large portion of worl's germ plasm of cotton has been



 screened  at the U. S. Boll Weevil Research Laboratory,  during



 the period 1962 to 1968.  An oviposition suppression factor causing



 25 to 40 percent reduction in the number of eggs laid by the weevil



 has been found in Gossypium bardadense and successfully moved into



 upland cotton,  G. hirsutum.  Research with five different genetic



 lines each carrying a frego gene showed a significant degree of non-



 preference for the oviposition to the boll weevil.  Weevils were found


                                                    24
 to avoid the exposed  bud for feeding and oviposition.







       Laboratory tests  have been devised which permit the screening



of large numbers of plant types under controlled levels of  exposure.



Marked differences in oviposition scores were obtained.  Inheritance



studies,  involving some of the less-preferred versus standard types,



indicated the oviposition  factor to be under genetic control, but the



results could  not be satisfactorily interpreted on a single gene basis.



More extensive studies involving backcross and F2 progeny provided



little  additional information,  due to difficulties in obtaining adequate



information on an individual plant basis.  The fact, however, that the



resistance to  oviposition can be satisfactorily transferred to other



strains is most encouraging.
                                  313

-------
       An extensive series of experiments has been conducted
establishing the existence of both plant attractants and  repellants.
The attractants,  still incompletely characterized, appear to be
alcohols and esters, while the repellants may be terpenoids.
Similarly, evidence exists for both feeding stimulants and deterrents.
In neither case have the causal constituents been adequately identified.
       The combination of morphological traits,  oviposition factors,
attractants, repellants and feeding stimulants to  provide adequate
field resistance in the absence of chemical control, together with the
essential genetic factors for yield and fiber quality, poses a
formidable task.  Continued progress may be expected, however,
as the intricacies are  exposed.25  This is an example of a case where
considerable research effort over a long period has been directed
toward development of an alternative technology to pesticidal
control.   Results  from such efforts would ultimately be the basis
for reduced use of pesticides.
       c.  Control of Cyst-Nematode in Soybeans by Resistance
       Discovery in 1954 of nematodes attacking soybeans in North
Carolina was the first report of this  pest outside the Orient.
Damage  to the crop posed a threat to the United States  soybean
industry.  Control of the soybean cyst nematodes has been difficult.
Multiple approaches have been necessary.  Application of chemicals
to the  soil has not been economically feasible. Crop rotation of
two to three years was effective,  but  resulted in  limited production.
Federal  and state quarantines were only partially successful.
       In 1957,  some  2, 800 soybean varieties were screened for
nematode resistance in heavily infested fields.2   Four varieties were
found on which the nematode did not reproduce.  The desirable
                          314

-------
characteristic of resistance was transferred to a commercial variety
and the new combination was called Pickett.  This variety was developed
cooperatively by the Agricultural Research Service and the Agricultural
Experiment Stations of Arkansas,  Missouri,  North Carolina, Tennessee,
and Virginia. 2

  d.  Breeding Vegetable  and Fruit Crops for Resistance to Diseases

       Disease  resistant vegetable varieties are especially noteworthy.
A vegetable grower in the Southeastern states by proper selection of such
varieties  can now reduce the damage  caused by such destructive
diseases as fusarium wilt of cabbage,  tomato,  and watermelon;
common mosaic of beans; celery leaf blights; spinach blight,  cucumber
scab; and many  others.  In many cases,  the farmer will not  sacrifice
the quality or productivity of his crop through use of a resistant
variety.27
       Examples of vegetables and fruits grown in  the Southeastern
states,  -which have shown resistance to fungus, nematode,  virus or
bacterial  diseases  are listed in Table G-3.

 e.  Disease and Insect Resistance Research for Southern Forests

       The greatest forest insect  resistance research is presently
concentrated on the fusiform rust  of southern pines.  Agencies, both
governmental and private, are engaged. z8 In North Carolina, a
"rust nursery" approach  is being used for mass screening of known
seed sources of southern pines.  It also permits estimatation of the
heritability of resistance in  a natural population of  southern  and
loblolly pine.  Since 1954, a tree improvement program has been
underway in Florida.  This involves  screening of select slash pines
for  reistance to fusiform rust.  Selection and field testing  of  slash
and loblolly pines of one parent and controlled progeny are being
studied for their resistance.
                          315

-------
       Table G-3.  Classification of Representative Vegetable and Fruit Disease Resistance Cases According to
                                 Causal Agent, Mode of Inheritance, and Field Experience ?
           Disease
                           Original source
                           of resistance
  Pathogen
 Field
reaction
CO

CTl
Monogenically  controlled resistance
 a.  Proven susceptible to
     races of prevalence
 1.  Potato late blight
 2.  Lettuce downy
       mildew
 3.  Bean powdery
       mildew
 4.  Cantaloupe powdery
       mildew
 5.  Bean rust
 6.  Apple scab
 7.  Tomato leaf mold

 8.  Bean anthracnose

 b.  Remaining resistant
       to prevalent races
 1.  Spinach d°wny
       mildew
 2.  Cucumber scab
 3.  Tomato leaf sopt
                                                  I.  Fungus Diseases
                                     Solanum demissum
                                     European varieties

                                     Several varieties

                                     Indian varieties

                                     Several varieties
                                     Malus baccata
                                     Lycoper^icon pimpinelli-
                                       folium
                                     Several varieties
                                     Iranian variety

                                     Longfellow variety
                                     Lycopersicon hirsutum
Phytophthoracinfestans        Immune
Bremia lactucae               Immune

Erysiphe polygoni             Immune

Erysiphe cichoracearjjm        Immune

Uromyces phaseoli typj.ca      Immune
Venturia inaequalis           Immune
Cladosporium fulvium          Immune

Cojlletotrichum linde-         Immune
  muthianum


Peronospora effusa            Immune

Cladosporium cucumerinum      Immune
Septoria lycopersici          Resistant

-------
                                           Table G-3.  (Continued)
    Disease
                                Original source
                                of resistance
                                        Pathogen

                                    Stemphylium solani
                                                  p
                                    F. oxysporum" lyco-
                                      persici
                                    F. oxysporum   ' con-
                                      glutianans
                                    Gymnosporangium juni-
                                      perivirginianae
                                    Venturia inaequalis
                                                                    Phytophthora fragariae
                                                                    Phytophthora  infestans

                                                                    Venturia inaequalis
                                                                    F_._ oxysporum  F. con-
                                                                      glu_tinans
  Field
 reaction
  4.   Tomato gray leaf
      spot
  5.   Tomato fusarium
      wilt
  6.   Cabbage fusarium
      wilt
  7.   Ceder-apple rust
                                L^. p imp in el 1 i fo 1 ium

                                L_._ pimpinellifolium

                                American varieties

                                Several apple varieties
  8.  Apple scab                Asiatic species of Malus
Polygenically3 controlled resistance
  a.  Proven susceptible to
      races of prevalence
  1.  Strawberry red stele
  b.  Remaining resistant
      to prevalent races
  1.  Potato late blight

  2.  Apple scab
  3.  Cabbage  fusarium
      wilt
Aberdeen and other
  varieties
Selections of Solanum
  demissum and other species
Antonovka
American varieties

          II.  Nematode Diseases
Monogenically3 controlled resistance
  a.  Proven susceptible to
      races of prevalence
        None
  b.  Remaining resistant
      to prevalent races
  1.  Tomato root knot         Lycopersicon peruvianum
  2.  Pepper root knot         Santanka X S variety
 Immune

 Immune

 Immune

 Immune

 Immune



Resistant



Resistant

Immune
Resistant
                                                                    Meloidogyne s_£p_.
                                                                    Meloidogyne spp.
                                                                Resistant
                                                                Resistant

-------
                                                 Table G-3.   (Continued)
            Disease
Original source
of resistance
  Pathogen
 Field
reaction
00
      Polygenically  controlled resistance
        a.  Proven susceptible to
            races of prevalence
              None
        b.  Remaining resistant
            to prevalent races
        1.  Lima beam root know
        2.  Peach root knot
Hopi 5989 and Westan
Shalil and Yannan
  varieties
Meloidoevne spp.
Meloidoevne incognita
   Resistant
   Resistant
      Monogenicallya controlled resistance
        a.  Proven susceptible to
            races of prevalence
        1.  Tomato spotted wilt
        b.  Remaining resistant
            to prevalent races
        1.  Bean mosaic
        2.  Bean pod mottle
        3.  Bean southern Mosaic
        4.  Pepper mosaic
        5.  Spinach blight
      Polygenically3 controlled resistance
        a.  Proven susceptible to
            races of prevalence
                                                 III.  Virus Diseases
Argentine variety
Corbett Refugee
Several varieties
Several varieties
Tabasco variety
Old Dominion; Va. Savoy
        1.  Tomato spotted wilt
        b.  Remaining resistant
            to prevalent races
        1.  Cabbage mosaic -
Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium
Selections from varieties
Spotted wilt virus
Bean virus 1
Bean pod mottle virus
Bean mosaic virus 4
Tabasco mosaic virus
Cucumber virus 1
Spotted wilt virus
   Resistant
   Resistant
   Immune
   Immune
   Immune
   Immune
   Resistant
Cabbage viruses A and B   Resistant

-------
                                                  Table G-3  (Continued)
           Disease
                                 Original source
                                 of resistance
   Pathogen
 Field
reaction
CO
        2.  Cucumber mosaic
        3.  Lima bean mosaic
        A.  Bean curly  top
        5.  Potato  latent mosaic
                                  Oriental varieties
                                  Fordhook and others
                                  Several varieties
                                  S41956 variety
                                                 IV.  Bacterial Diseases
Monogenically  controlled resistance
  a.  Proven susceptible to
      races of prevalence
        None
  b.  Remaining resistant
      to prevalent races
         1.   Bean halo blight
                                  Several dry bean varieties
       Polygenically  controlled resistance
         a.   Proven susceptible to
             races of prevalence
               None
         b.   Remaining resistant
             to prevalent races
         1.  Pear fireblight
                                  Selections from Pyrus spp.
Cucumber virus  1
Cucumber virus  1
Curly top virus
Potato virus
Pseudomonas phaseo-
  licola
Erwinia amylovora
 Resistant
 Resistant
 Resistant
 Immune
Resistant
Resistant
         Resistances that have been found to  be  controlled by more than one factor pair are classified here as
       polygenic.
          In 1958, a race of Pernospora effusa developed  extensively  in California on this source of resistance.

          Source:  Shay,  J.  R.

-------
              f.  Insect Resistance to Corn Earworm
       Heliothis zea (Boddie) is adapted to feed on a wide range of
hosts and has been given common names associated with the crop
attacked,  e.g.,  the corn earworm,  the  cotton bollworm,  and the
tomato fruitworm.  The most widely used control has involved chemicals.
Several million  pounds are being used annually. Considerable effort has
been devoted to  corn and cotton to develop varieties which possess
some degree of  tolerance or resistance.
       The corn earworm may feed on the leaves,  silks,  or the
developing grains.  Most studies on resistance have been concerned
with damage to the grain.  The literature is extensive and variation
in earworm damage has been ascribed to variety,  planting dates,
spacings, date of maturity, soil fertility, concentration of feeding
stimulant and nitrogen balance.  Varietal differences have commonly
been associated with husk  characteristics,  either extension or tightness.
However, chemical differences also appear to be involved.
       The effect of either husk extension or husk tightness are
explicable from knowledge concerning the feeding habits and cannibalistic
tendencies of the earworm.  Either husk extension  or tightness or their
combination may ensure minimizing damage to the  developing grain,
but have  little or no effect on population dynamics,  and  therefore,
represent a special case of tolerance  rather than one of antibiosis.25
Extensive work  should be under taken to find  sources of resistance
(amtibiosis) to leaf feeding.
                g.  Resistance to Potato Leaf Hopper
       The nonhardy and Turkestan alfalfa varieties are highly
susceptible to the potato leaf hopper while Medicago falcata or cultivars
involving  some degree of falcata introgression possess  greater
                              320

-------
resistance/5 Pubescent plants tend to be less attractive for opposition


than glabrous plants,  although resistant types  may be found in each


category.  After seven cycles of selection "cherokee" variety was


released from such pubescent resistant  plant types.  This variety


has been superior to 'Atlantic1 and 'Williamsburg1  in the area where

it was developed, North Carolina.25



        Resistant varieties are one of the least expensive means of


avoiding pest damage. Such efforts however, do not and should not


cease after a new variety is developed for a given crop.  New disease


strains develop for which further resistance needs to be incorporated.


Multiple pest resistance is also  in need of greater  study.  For many


crop  varieties,  breeders have started to look for reduced weed competition.


The potential benefits of pest resistance have,  as  yet, not been fully


exploited.



                5.  Biological Agents for Pest Control


        Biological control is the  suppression of the  reproductive poten-


tial of organisms through the actions of parasites,  predators, or patho-


gens to restrict pest population at a lower average  density than would


occur if these were absent.


        The citrus industry in California once suffered a massive infes-


tation of a  mealy bug, cottony cushion-scale (Icerya purchasi), intro-


duced from Australia on Acacia  in 1868.  The introduction of two


Australian species,  the ladybirds, Radola cardinalis (vedalia ladybird)


and Cryptochetum iceryae, provided the necessary predator-prey regu-


lation.  They first reduced the mealy bug populations to levels at which


they no longer constituted a major pest infestation.  Unfortunately,


however, as is shown in Figure  G-3, cottony cushion-scale again


reached major pest population levels when extensive use of DDT for

                                                     29
citrus spraying  eliminated the vedalia ladybird locally.
                            321

-------
       This recurrence emphasizes an inherent danger of pesticide use.


There may be a catastrophic effect on the natural regulatory mechanisms.


While they temporarily diminish the numbers of a particular pest,  the


pesticides also reduce its natural enemies.  The pest often undergoes


a population explosion before its natural enemies can recover.



       Successful biological control programs have engendered world-


wide interest.  The governments of several countries have established


facilities for such research.



       The interest in microbial insecticides has intensified because


of such problems as development of resistant strains,  emergence of


secondary pests, and  toxic residues.  These have developed with the


use of the broad  spectrum chemical insecticides.   Steinhaus   was the


first to employ the term  microbial control.
                 introduction of

                 Crptochaetum iceryae and

                 Rodolia cardinalis
W
a

&


o
     3
     a,
     o
     fx.
                                         Resurgence produced by

                                        DDT in  San Joaquin Valley
     1868
             General

             equilibrium

             position
        1888-89  1892
                                       1947
      Figure  G-3.  Cottony cushion-scale  (Icerya purchasi)

               incidence on citrus in  California.^


      Source:   Stern, V. M. et al.
                                  322

-------
       Insects, like animals,  suffer from disease attacks.  Under

favorable conditions, a disease may reach epidemic proportions for

an insect species.  Within a few days or weeks it may reduce the

species from a point of great  abundance to one of scarcity. Insect

diseases may be caused by protozoa, fungi, viruses and bacteria.

During the last two decades, there has been an increasing awareness

of the  great potential of insect diseases as insect control agents.  About

225 species of insect viruses have now been isolated.  Of these, the

nuclear polyhedroses (107 species) and the granuloses (80 species) are
effective candidates for insect control.31   Greer32  reported over 300

insect viruses that can be utilized for control of specific pests.

       The advantages offered by microbial pesticides are:

       o Insect pathogens in  general and viruses in particular,
          are very discriminating and infect only one  species
          or members of closely related species.33

       • Microbial control is a natural method of control and
          it increases  the effectiveness  naturally after once
          being introduced into  an area.  If conditions are
          optimum, the introduced microorganisms may spread
          of their  own accord, resulting in widespread killing
          of the host.

       • Microbial insecticides are biodegradable and leave
          no residue or buildup in the soil, as occurs with
          many chemical pesticides.

       • Most microbial pesticides are essentially harmless
          to animals and plants  and may be applied in heavy
          doses without damaging these forms of life.

        •  Microbial pesticides  are generally compatible with
           other pesticides.
                                  323

-------
Examples of pathogenic diseases associated with major economic

arthopod pests are listed in Table G-4.  Selected examples of arthopod

pathogens used successfully to control arthropod pests are presented

in Table G-5.  Table G-6 lists the arthropod pathogens  commercially

or experimentally produced by commercial firms for use as microbial

insecticides.

       All methods of pest control have disadvantages.   The perfect

method of controlling pests is yet to be devised.  The only intelligent
approach to the evaluation of any method of control is through an honest

acknowledgment of its limitations.  Gaps may thus be filled by other

control procedures.  Some of the  limitations of microbial pest control
are:

        0 Perhaps the greatest single aspect not yet understood
          in the use of microorganisms in the control of insect
          pests has to do with the timing  of application in
          relation to environmental conditions.  Some researchers
          believe that high humidity has little effect on virus
          diseases, others,  however, have associated virus
          epizootics with wet weather.  In the laboratory,  an
          excess of moisture often leads to the outbreak of bac-
          terial diseases. Low humidity  is generally considered
          a limiting factor in fungus diseases for the spore germ-
          ination,  infection and subsequent sporulation of the
          fungus  on the host.  High temperature generally accel-
          erates  the course of a disease.  Much  remains to be
          learned about  optimum times to apply the microorgan-
          isms.

        ® There is a necessity  of maintaining the vitality and
          virulence of the infecting agent  especially for those
          microorganisms not possessing a cyst or spore stage.
          The possibility exists that resistant populations will
          develop after prolonged use of microorganisms.
          This requires further study.

        c The effect that heavily applied entomogenous micro-
          organisms may have upon plants and higher animals
          always needs to be considered.  There appears to be
                              324

-------
             TABLE  G-4.  Examples of Pathogenic Diseases Associated
                      with Major Economic Arthropod Pests^
 Arthropod Pest Complex
        Pathogen Genus
                     Forest, Ornamental and Shade Trees
Gypsy-Tussock moth,
  webworm-budworm
Tent caterpillars

Sawflies

Scolytid-beetles
Aspergillus, Nosema, Thelohania, Ba-
  cillus, NPV, CPV GV
Beauveria, Nosema, Thelohania, Clos-
  tridium, Bacillus, NPV
Beauveria, Entomophthora, Spicaria,
  Plistophora, Bacillus, NPV, CPV,  GV
Beauveria, Metarrhizium, Spicaria,  Bre-
  vibacterium, Flavobacterium, Nosema
                     Fruits, Vegetables and Truck Crops
Aphids-plant bugs
Citrus scale-mites
Cutworms-cabbageworms
Grasshoppers-crickets
Leafrollers-codling moth-
  budworms
Wireworms-grubs-chrysomelid
  beetles
Beauveria, Entomophthora,  Acrostalag-
  mus, Fusarium, Aspergillus,  Pseudo-
  monas,  Vibrio
Beauveria, Aeschersonia,  Cordyceps,
  Entomophthora, Fusarium,  Hirsutella,
  Cephalosporium, Bacillus, NIV

Beauveria, Entomophthora,  Spicaria,
  Nosema, Mattesia, Serratia,  Bacillus,
  Pseudomonas,  NPV, CPV,  GV
Entomophthora,  Malameba,  Aerobacter,
  Pseudomonas,  Serratia,  Rickettsiella,
  NPV, NIV
Beauveria, Metarrhizium,  Aspergillus,
  Plistophora,  Bacillus,  NPV,  CPV, GV
Beauveria, Metarrhizium,  Sorosporella,
  Cordyceps, Bacillus,  Clostridium,
  Streptococcus, Serratia,  Rickettsiella,
  Enterella
                  Grain, Grasses, Forage and Fiber Crops
Armyworms-leafworms

Bollworms-Budworms



Boll-alfalfa-clover weevils

Stem-stalk borers
Entomophthora,  Spicaria,  Nosema, Ba-
  cillus, NPV,  CPV, GV,  NIV
Beauveria, Spicaria, Nosema, Mattesia,
  Plistophora,  Bacillus,  Serratia,  NPV
  CPV, GV

Beauveria, Hirsutella, Mattesia, Plis-
  tophora, Glugea, Bacillus, NIV
Beauveria, Aspergillus,  Plistophora,
  Thelohania, Perezzia,  Nosema, NPV, NIV
                                    325

-------
TABLE  G~4     (Continued)
 Arthropod Pest Complex
          Pathogen Genus
          Household, j>tored Products, Man and Domesticated Animals
Cattle grubs-flies
Clothes moth
Cockroaches-termites
Lice-mites
Mosquitoes-midges-gnats
Stored products beetles

Stored products caterpillars
Entomophthora, Bacillus
Nosema, Bacillus, NPV, CPV
Entomophthora, Serratia
Aspergillus, Bacillus
Entomophthora, Aspergillus, Coelomo-
  myces, Thelohania, Plistophora, No-
  sema, Bacillus, Enterella, NPV
Nosema, Adelina, Mattesia, Farinocys-
  tis, Ophyocystis, Bacillus
Nosema, Mattesia, Bacillus, NPV, CPV, GV
     Source:   Ignoffo,  C. M.  (Modified).
                                     326

-------
    TABLE  G~5'   Selected Examples of Arthropod Pathogens Used
          Successfully to Control Arthropod Pests 34
       Pathogen
      Pest Species
                             Viruses
  Nuclear polyhedrosis
  Cytoplasmic polyhedrosis
  Granulosis
  Non-Inclusion
Bollworm-budworm complex
European spruce sawfly
Alfalfa caterpillar
Cabbage looper
 Pine processionary worm
Cabbageworm
Spruce budworm
Red-banded leaf roller
Codling moth
Citrus mite
                           Bacteria
  Bacillus popilliae
  Bacillus thuringiensis
  Coccobacillus acridiorum
  Serratia marcescens
Japanese beetle
 Many caterpillar spp,
 Grasshoppers
Termites
                           Protozoa
  Thelohania hyphantriae
  Mattesia grandis
  Malameba locustiae
Fall webworm
Boll weevil
Grasshoppers
  Entomophthora spp.

  Beauveria spp.

  Metarrhizium anisopliae


  Aeschersonia spp.
Brown-tailed moth
Spotted alfalfa aphid
Chinch bug
Colorado potato beetle
Corn borer
Sugar beet curculio
Froghopper
White fly and Scale insects
Source'  Tgnoffo, C. M. (Modified).
                             327

-------
         TABLE  G-6.   Arthropod Pathogens Commercially or Experimentally
        Produced by Commercial Firms for Use as Microbial Insecticides-
    Disease Organism
        Product Names
        Susceptible  Pests
                             Commercially Produced
Bacillus popilliae
Bacillus thuringiensis
Heliothis NPV
Trichoplusia NPV
Neodiprion NPV
Doom, Japidemic
Agritrol, Amdol-6000,
  Bakthane L-69,
  Bactospeine, Bathurin
  Biospor 2802, Biotrol
  BTB, Dendrobacilin,
  Entobakterin-3,
  Parasporin, Sporeine,
  Thuricide, Tribactur
Virex
Cabbage looper virus
Polyvirocide
 Japanese beetle,  Scarabaeids
 Alfalfa caterpillar, Artichoke
  plume moth, Bagworm, Cabbage
,  looper, Diamondback moth,
  Fruit-tree leaf  roller,  Grape
  leaf folder, Gypsy moth, Im-
  ported cabbageworm, Lawn
  moth, Linden looper, Oak moth,
  Orange dog, Rindworm complex,
  Saltmarsh caterpillar, Spring-
  Fall cankerworm, Tent cater-
  pillar, Tobacco  budworm,
  Tobacco budworm, Tobacco and
  tomato hornworm, Webworm com-
  plex, Winter moth
 Corn earworm, Cotton bollworm,
  Tobacco budworm, Tomato  fruit-
  worm
 Cabbage looper
 Pine sawfly
                            Experimentally Produced
Bacillus sphaericus

Beauveria bassiana
IMC,B_. sphaericus

Biotrol FBB, IMC-
  B. bassiana
Metarrhizium anisopliae
                          IMC,+M. anisopliae
Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus
  Heliothis              Biotrol VHZ:VIRON/H
Aquatic diptera, i.e., mosqui-
   toes, midges, simulids
Alfalfa weevil, Cockroach,  Codl-
   ing moth, Coconut  zygaenid,
   Colorado potato beetle, Cutworm,
   European corn borer, Grass-
   hoppers, Horsefly,  Japanese
   beetle, Larch sawfly, Stored
   products beetles,  Websorms
Corn borer, Cutworm  Frog hopper,
   Leafhopper,  Rhinoceros beetle,
   Sugar beet  curculio, Sugarcane-
   borer, Wheat cockchafer

Corn earworm,  Cotton bollworm,
   Tobacco budworm, Tomato fruit-
   worm
                                  328

-------
TABLE G-6 (Continued)
      Disease Organism           Product Names           Susceptible Pests
    Prodenia              Biotrol VPO, VIRON/P   Cotton leafworm; Pacific,
                                                   Southern, and Yellow-
                                                   striped armyworm
    Spodoptera            VIRON/S                Beet armyworm, Fall armyworm
    Trichoplusia          Biotrol VTN; VIRON/T   Cabbage looper
       a Only Doom,  Japidemic, Biotrol BTB,  and  Thuricide  are  currently
    commercially available in U.  S.

       Source:  Ignoffo, C. M. (Modified).
                                      329

-------
          little likelihood,  however, that microorganisms
          naturally pathogenic to insects  could cause serious
          injury to animals or plants.

       •  A microbial insecticide can be  used against one
          species  only.  Mixed formulations  have not yet been
          widely tested.

       •  Of considerable importance is the effect that patho-
          genic microorganisms  may have upon the insect para-
          sites and predators of a pest.   Only a few observations
          have been made, but enough has been learned to sug-
          gest that close attention must be paid to this  relation-
          ship whenever the artificial dissemination of micro-
          organisms is  contemplated.  Sometimes the insect
          parasites and the disease are  related in a comple-
          mentary or supplementary fashion.   This has been
          observed in alfalfa fields infested with caterpillars
          of the alfalfa butterfly (Colias).  In  fields where the
          polyhedral wilt disease is present but not abundant
          among the  caterpillars, the  smaller larvae may be
          parasitized by Apanteles while  the  larger larvae may
                            •'«•' • 	               *» rt
          be killed by the polyhedral wilt disease.

       Herbicides  have been used to control aquatic weeds.  Aquatic
weeds obstruct water flow, increase evaporation and induce  large

losses of water through transpiration.  The management of aquatic
vegetation has  been revitalized recently because of increased demand

on our fresh waters.   Major aquatic weeds in  the U.. S.   are water

hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes,  water fern, Salvinia auriculata, water

lettuce, Pistia stratiotes; submersed weeds belonging to genera, Scipus,
                                                 •3 C  O £
Typha, Nymphaea, Saggitaria, and Alternanthera.  '

       The demand for a clean environment is bringing  close public

and legislative scrutiny of all pesticides with the likely result  of cur-

tailment of certain herbicides that are  used in aquatic weed control.

This is forcing many state  and federal research agencies to search for

alternate  methods.  Mechanical methods  are  costly,  usually temporary
                                  330

-------
in effect,  and difficult to employ in canals.  Biological control offers


a potential means of control over extensive areas where the cost of


chemical  or mechanical practices would be prohibitive.



       To date, biological control of weeds has been accomplished


mainly by insects; but use of mites, snails, pathogenic microorganisms,


fish,  ducks and geese,  manatees,  and parasitic higher plants are under


investigation.    Caution is  necessary for thorough screening of all


animals which are introduced for control of weeds.  In the absence of


their preferred food there is danger in their becoming pests of alter-


nate plant types.  This caution is less  necessary for agents introduced


for insect control.



                a. Biological Control of Red Scale and

                       and Purple Scale in Florida



       Florida red scale, Chrysomphalus anoidum (1.) and purple scale,


Lepidosaphes beckii (Newman), were until recently the two most impor-


tant armored scales on citrus.  Control  of purple scale by the introduc-


tion of the parasite Aphytis lepidosaphes has been reported.     Hymeno-


pterous parasites represent the critical  control factors for the Florida


red scale. Pseudhomalopoda prima, the parasite attacking mature


female red scale, is highly important.  The most important  parasite


species appear to be Aspidiotiphagus lounsburyi and Phospaltella

                                                         38
aurantii which attack male and second-stage female scales.    A special


survey of Florida red scale  and parasites was made between February


and June  1967 in 104 groves. Parasites  were identified as being either


P. prima or  A. holoxanthus. Parasitism by A_. holoxanthus was very


high. This parasite, which was introduced from California in I960,


appears to have much greater ability to survive adverse weather condi-


tions than_P.  prima.39' 4°   Partial to complete control has  been


achieved using these parasites in most areas  in Florida.
                                331

-------
        b.  Biological Control of Cotton Bollworm and Tobacco
                       Budworm in Mississippi

       Several species of parasitic insects were reared from field

collected  larvae of the bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie); and the

tobacco budworm,  H_.  yirescens (F. ), in Mississippi.4   The parasites

belong to  the families Braconidae, Ichmeumonidae,  and Tachinidae.

The predominant species were two Braconids, Microplitis croceipes

and  Cardiochiles nigriceps.   Parasites  provided a high percent of

control on cranesbill, tomato, and spider flower.   Observations  were

also reported on the effectiveness of Cardiochiles nigriceps  in control-

ling H.  virescens on tobacco in areas of Florida and Georgia.4

        c. Control of Pea Aphid by Aphidius  smithi in Kentucky

       Since 1962, Aphidius smithi was found to be parasitizing

increasingly large numbers  of the pea aphid,  Acyrtho siphon  pi sum,  in

clover and alfalfa fields in Kentucky.43  In a 6-hour parasitization

period,  60 pea aphids parasitization by Aphidius smithi was  highest
(82 percent average) with first-instar aphids,  and lowest (0 percent)

with post  reproductive aphids.  Such differences in degree of parasiti-

zation were not found  in mixed groups of various instars.  Progeny

production by pea aphid  ceased after the fourth day if they were para-

sitized on the first day of parturition (birth).   A^.  pi sum parasitized in

the third instar did not mature to the reproductive state.   This parasite

was  propagated and widely released in California and has since become

an important factor in the  control of pea aphid in that area.

    d.  Introduced Wasps for the Control of Gypsy Moth in Alabama

       Twenty-thousand tiny parasitic wasps were released  in 1971 in

Russell County, Alabama, in an effort to prevent the spread of the
                               332

-------
gypsy moth,  the world's most serious forest pest.44  These moths were

recently reported in Alabama.  The wasps which are completely harm-

less to people, were  shipped from New York, but are native to the

Mediterranean countries.  The wasps  seek out egg masses  of the moth

and lay their eggs in  the moth eggs.   When the wasp eggs hatch,  the

larvae feed on the eggs of the moth and destroy them.  In this case a
biological agent prevents the establishment of this pest.

         e.  Field Control of the Nantucket Pine Tip Moth by the
                 Nematode  DD-136 in South  Carolina

       Field investigations have demonstrated that the  nematode DD-136
will kill Nantucket pine tip moth,  Rhyacionia frustrana,  larvae under
natural conditions.45  More  first-generation  tip moth larvae were killed

than secord or third  generations.  Nematode suspensions were aided in
effectiveness by addition of  10 percent glycerin and to a lesser degree

by addition of wetting agents  or spreader-sticker, namely 2 percent
solution of Emgard 2050,  Sole-Onic CDS, and Igepon AO-78.45 DD-136
did not provide sufficient control of the moth to recommend its use.

This case suggests that biological agents cannot be successfully

employed in all situations.

                   f.  Heliothis Control with Virus

       Virus, Viron/H    , attacks only species of the genus Heliothis

virescens of which there are two major economic pests.  One is H_.
virescens, the tobacco budworm and the other  is II. zea commonly

known as cotton bollworm.  This virus has performed equal to or
better than commonly used chemical insecticides in 80  to 90 percent
of the cases.  Its greatest advantages  lie in the fact that it is completely

specific  and is absolutely  safe and non-toxic.   This virus is reasonably
compatible with some chemical insecticides.  These  can be  sprayed in
                                 333

-------
mixtures as long as the pH of the solution is neutral.  The formulated
form contains 126 billion inclusion bodies per ounce and a quart will
control the bollworms on 10 acres of cotton with a light to moderate
infestation.   The application of this virus in practically every cotton-
growing state was permitted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
in 1970.32
    g.  Integration of the  Heliothis Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus  into
        a Biological Control Program on Control in Mississippi
        A biological control program for the control of bollworm,  PI.
zea,  and tobacco budworm, H.  virescens,  was integrated into an over-
wintering boll-weevil control program on cotton in the Mississippi
Delta in 1965.4'  The Heliothis program was designed to utilize
biological control measures whereby chemical control would not be
required during the growing season.  The factors utilized in the Helio-
this biological program consisted of the naturally occurring predator -
parasite complex and the application of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus.
Heliothis control with biological agents was compared with a toxaphene-
DDT-methyl parathion  control program using  25 to 30 acre plots.   The
virus was applied at 1.2 X 10" (20 LU,  Larval Units),  3. 0 X 10" (50 LU),
and 6. 0 X 10" (100 LU)  polyhedral inclusion bodies per acre.  The
initiation of virus applications was varied to evaluate the effectiveness
of the virus against various ages  of larvae. The Heliothis biological
control program compared favorably with the  insecticide program -when
virus application was initiated to  coincide with hatch of egg populations.
     h.  Two-Spotted Spider Mite Control with Fungus in Alabama
        A study was conducted  in Alabama in 1968 to determine  the
importance of Entomophthora  sp. as a natural  control factor for
                               334

-------
field populations of the two-spotted spider mite,  Tetranychus urticae
Koch.  Studies on the distribution of this fungus revealed its presence
in 14 of the 15 counties where collections were made.  Average infec-
                                      47
tion rate by this fungus was 25 percent.  Five epizootics of the patho-
genic fungus were  observed in two-spotted spider mite populations in
Lee County,  Alabama.  Each  epizootic was characterized by a  high
degree of infection by Entomophthora sp. accompanied by a rapid
decline in mite numbers.  This was a preliminary study and no final
conclusions can be drawn.   Further research work is needed.
         i.  Control of Aquatic Weeds by the Snail in Florida
       Experiments  were conducted in the state of Florida in 200-
gallon concrete tanks to evaluate the effectiveness of large fresh-water
snails, Marisa cornuarietis,  as a biological aquatic weed control agent.
The snails controlled Ceratophyllum demersum,  Najas guadalupensis,
and Potamogeton illineonsis completely and Pistia stratiotes and
Alternanthera philoxeroides partially.  Marisa preferred submersed
weeds  to floating weeds.   Little damage was done by Marisa to  4 and  5
week-old rice plants, but younger rice was killed when the snails had
no other source of food.48  Except for its possible deletarious effects
in rice-growing areas, Marisa was regarded as very  promising within
Florida for the control of aquatic weeds at least in confined bodies of
water. 49
        i.   Biological Control of Alligatorweed with Flea Beetle
                        in Southeastern States
       Alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroides, is an extremely
prolific plant which is most difficult to control and even more difficult
to kill. It  does not pose a serious weed problem in South America,
where  40 to 50 species of insects act as suppressing biotic agents.
                               335

-------
Only one of these insects was known to occur in the United States  and


this insect, a flea beetle, belongs to genus Agasicles.  During the fall


of 1965 and spring of 1966,  over 9, 000 beetles  were transferred to


selected and approved locations throughout Florida,  Georgia, South


Carolina, and Mississippi. *   Frequent observations were made in the


vicinity of the release sites and at no  time was there any evidence that


the beetle fed on any plant other than alligatorweed.   The beetles  pre-


fer the alligatorweed that is growing in the water.  The results look

                                                                     5fl
very promising and  should be extended to pilot  studies on larger areas.



       k.  Control of Pond Weeds by the  Use of Herbivorous Fish



        The possible use of herbivorous fish has received little atten-


tion in the United States. Common  carp,  Cyprinus carpie,  may control


some aquatic plants by keeping the water muddy and to a lesser degree


by rooting out plants. In China, Japan, Israel,  and  Thailand; the grass


carp,  Ctenopharyngodon idellus, has been used successfully for the


control of rooted aquatics. 36



        Species  of fish that feed upon aquatic weeds and appear promising


in Alabama are listed in Table G-7. Since 1957 eight species of fish have


been field tested for effectiveness in aquatic weed control in Alabama.


The Congo tilapia,  Tilapia melanopleura; grass carp,  Ctenopharyngodon


idellus; and the Israeli carp,  Cyprinus carpio have shown the best poten-


tial for weed control. In ponds, Congo tilapia,  when stocked at rates of


approximately 1, 500 to 1, 000 per acre, controlled in three months


Pithophora sp. , giant Spirogyra,  E_. acicularis,  1C.  densa,  Hydrochloa


sp. , IJ.  biflora, and Rhizoclonium  sp. Grass carp controlled Chara sp.,


P. oviersi folius and _E_. acicularis  in one month when stocked at  a rate


of 20 to 40 per acre.  Six to 9-inch  Israeli carp, when stocked at rates


of 25 to 50 per acre, were  effective in reducing or eliminating
                                336

-------
    TABLE G-7  Species of fishes feeding upon filamentous algae and  rooted
aquatics that appear of promise in the biological control of pond  weeds  in
                                  Alabama.35
Common name
Common carp
Grass carp
Golden carp
Goldfish
Tawes
Nilem
Tilapia
Tilapia
Gourami
Sepat Siam
Milkfish
Scientific name Feeding upon
Filamentous Rooted
algae aquatics
Cyprinis carpio (Lin.) x x
Ctenopharyagodon idellus (C. and V.) x
Carassium carassius (Lin.) x
Carassius auratus Lin. x
Puntius javanicus (Bleeker) x x
Osteochilus hasselti (C- and V;) x
Tilapia mossambica Peters x x
Tilapia melanopleura (Dum.) x
Osphronemus goramy (Lac.) x
Trichogaster pectoralis (Regan) x
Chanos chanos (Forskal) x x

      Source:   Swingle,  H.  S.
                                      337

-------
Pithophora sp.,  Rhizoclonium sp.,  and_E.  acicularis but in some
ponds required 2 to 3 years to effect control.51
       The species of fish receiving most of the attention in Georgia
are: Tilapia nilotica,  Tilapia mossambica,  T. melanopleura,
Cyprinus carpio, and  Ctenopharyngodon idellus.  All observations on
Chinese or grass carp, C. idellus, are most favorable.52  In the spring
of 1967, 2, 000 grass carp were stocked in a 20-acre pond in Georgia
that had a 5-year history of excessive growths of Najas,  and
Potamogeton.   Within 6 weeks, grass carp was able to consume most
of the rooted aquatic vegetation.
       Table G-8 contains a list of insect parasites and predators
successfully  colonized in the Continental United States. 53 Many of
the pests listed  in the table are also of economic importance in the
southeastern part of the United States.
       Many of  the economic  pests in the United States have come
from other countries without their biological parasites or predators.
Through lack of biological agents and abundance of food in agro-
ecosystems some of these pests have themselves become important
problems.  Importation and release of biological agents have shown
promise as control programs.  Considerable success has also been
achieved by the  use of pest pathogens (bacteria and virus) in controlling
economic pests.
                               338

-------
         Table G-8 Insect Pest and  their  Parasites  and  Predators  Successfully
                      Colonized  in  Continental  United States 53
             PEST
                                          WHERE  FOUND
                        PARASITE OR PREDATOR
Aphids, several species. Family
  Aphidae (see Field and Garden
  Insects)

Apple mealybug, Phenacoccus
  aceris  (Signoret)

Black scale,
  Saissetia oleae  (Bern.)
 FRUIT INSECTS

Florida citrus
and papaya areas
Oregon, and Maine
to Vermont

California
Leis dimidiata 15-spilota
  (Hope)
Allotropa utilis Hues.
Aphycus helvolus Comp.
Aphycus lounsburyi How.
Aphycus stanleyi (Comp.)
Coccophagus capensis Comp.
Coccophagus cowperi Gii.
Coccophagus pulvtnariae Comp.
Coccophagus rusti Comp.
Coccophagus trifasciatus Comp.
Diversinervus elegans Silv.
Lecaniobius utilis Comp.
Quaylea whittieri (Gir.)
Rhizobius debilis Blackb.
Rhizpbius ventralis (Er.)
Scutellista cyanea Mots.
California  red  scale,
  Aonidiella  aurantii(Mask.)
Chiefly Cali-
fornia, Arizona,
and Texas
Citrophilus mealybug,
  Pseudococcus  gahani  Green
  (see Tree and Shrub  Insects)
Citrus mealybug,
  Pseudococcus  citri (Risso)  (See
  Tree and Shrub  Insects)
                                        California
California and
Florida
Aphytis lingnanensis Comp.
Aphytis melinus DeBach
Chilocorus kuwanae Silv.
Comperiella fasciata Hew.
  (red scale strain)
Cybocephalus sp.
Habrolepis rouxi Comp.
Lindorus lophantae (Blaisd.)
Orcus chalybeus (Boisd.)
Prospaltella perniciosi Tower
  (red scale strain)
Cleodiplosis koebelei (Felt)
Coccophagus gurneyi Comp.
Scymnus binaevatus (Muls.)
Tetracnemus pretiosus Timb.

Allotropa citri Hues.
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.
I^eptomastidea abnormis  (Gir.)
Pauridia peregrina Timb.
                                       339

-------
         G-8  (Continued)
            PEST
   WHERE FOUND
                                                               PARASITE OR PREDATOR
                                   FRUIT INSECTS.—Continued.
 Coconut scale,
  Aspidiotus destructor Sign.

Cornstock mealybug,
  Pseudococcus comstocki  (Kuw.)

Cottony-cushion scale,
  Icerya purchasi Mask.
Florida red scale,
  Chrysomphalus aonidum  (L.)
Gypsy moth,
  Porthetria dispar  (L.)  (see Tree
   and Shrub Insects)
Florida
Eastern apple
regions

California,
Arizona, and
Southeastern
seaboard

Florida,
Mississippi,
Louisiana,
California

New England, New
York, New Jersey
and Pennsylvania
Japanese beetle,
  Popillia japonica Newm. (See Field
   and Garden Insects and Tree and
    Shrub Insects)
Long-tailed mealybug,
  Pseudococcus adonidum  (L.)
   (See Tree and Shrub Insects)

Olive scale,
  Parlatoria oleae (Colvee)
   (See Tree and Shrub Insects)
The East
California
California and
Maryland
Azya trinitatis Mshll.
Cryptognatha nodiceps Mshll.

Allotropa burrelli Mues.
Pseudaphycus malinus Gahan

Cryptochaetum iceryae (Will.)
Rodolia cardinalis (Muls.)
Aphytis holoxanthus DeBach
Anastatus disparis Ruschka
Apanteles melanoscelus (Ratz.)
Blepharipa scutellata R.-D.
Calosoma sycophanta (L.)
Carabus auratus L.
Compsilura concinnata (Meig.)
Exorista larvarum (L.)
Monodontomerus aereus Wlkr.
Ooencyrtus kuwanai (How.)
Parasetigena agilis (R.-D.)
Phobocampe disparis (Vier.)

Dexilla ventralis (Aid.)
Hyperecteina aldrichi Mesnil
Prosena siberita (F.)
Tiphia popilliavora Roh.
Tiphia vernalis Roh.

Anagyrus fusciventris (Gir.)
Anarhopus sydeyensis Timb.
Tetracnemus peregrinus Comp.

Aphytis maculicornis  (Masi)
  (Egyptian strain)
  (Indian strain)
  (Persian strain)
  (Spanish strain)
Aspidiotiphagus sp.
Chilocorus bipustulatus  (L.)
                                          340

-------
TABLE G-8  (Continued)
           PEST
WHERE FOUND
  PARASITE OR PREDATOR
                                FRUIT INSECTS.—Continued.
   Oriental  fruit  moth,
     Grapholitha molesta (Busck)
 The East
 California, and
 scattered elsewhere
Agathis diversa (Hues.)
Agathis festiva Hues.
   Pineapple mealybug,
     Pseudococcus brevipes (Ckll.)

   Purple scale,
     Lepidosaphes beckii (Newm.)

   Scales,  several species,  Family
     Coccidae (see Tree and  Shrub
      Insects)
 South Florida
 and Hawaii

 California,
 Florida to Texas

 General in fruit
 areas
   Walnut aphid,                       Pacific Coast
     Chromaphis ju glandicola (Kalt.)  States, Utah and
      (see Tree and Shrub Insects)    Idaho
   Western grape leaf skeletonizer,
     Harrisina brillians B.  & McD.

   Woolly apple aphid
     Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausm.)
   Yellow scale,
     Aonidiella citrina (Coq.)
 Southwest, Utah
 Colorado

 General
 California, Texas
 and Florida
Hambletonia pseudococcina
  Comp.

Aphytis lepidosaphes Comp.
Physcus fulyus C. & A.

Chilocorus sp. near distigma
  (Klug)
Exochomus quadripustulatus
  (L.)
                        Trioxys
                 Hal.
Apanteles harrisinae Mues.
Sturmia harrisinae Coq.

Aphelinus mali (Hald.)
Exochomus quadripustulatus
  (L.)

Comperiella bifasciata How
   Alfalfa weevil,
     Hypera postica (Gyll.)
                              FIELD AND GARDEN INSECTS

                                      General
   Aphids,  several species,  Family    General
     Aphidae (see Fruit Insects)

   Asiatic  garden beetle,              The East
     Maladera castanea (Arrow)

   Clover leaf weevil                 General
     Hypera punctata (F.)
                        Anaphes pratensis (Foerst.)
                        Bathyplectes curculionis
                          (Thorns.)
                        Microtonus aethiops (Nees.)
                        Tetrastichus incertus Ratz.
                        Tiphia asericae A. & J.
                        Biolysia tristis (Grav.)
                                          341

-------
TABLE G-8   (Continued)
               PEST
  WHERE FOUND
                         PARASITE OR PREDATOR
                                  FIELD AND GARDEN INSECTS.—
                                                        Continued
     European corn borer,
       Ostrinia nubilalis  (Hbn.)
     European wheat stem sawfly,
       Cephus pygmaeus (L.)
     Greenbug,
       Schizaphis graminum (Rondani)

     Hessian fly,
       Phytophaga destructor (Say)

     Imported cabbageworm,
       Pieris rapae (L.)

     Japanese beetle,
       Popillia japonica Newm. (see
        Fruit Insects and Tree and
         Shrub Insects)

     Pea aphid,
       Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)

     Rhodes grass scale,
       Antonina graminis (Mask.)
     Spotted alfalfa aphid,
       Therioaphis maculata (Buckton)

     Sugarcane borer,
       Diatraea saccharalis (F.)
     Yellow clover aphid,
       Therioaphis trifolii (Monell)
The East and the
Midwest
Eastern wheat
areas and North
Dakota

General
All small-grain
areas

General
The East
General
Gulf States, New
Mexico, Arizona
and California

General
Gulf States
Chelonua annulipes Wesm.
Horogenes punctorius (Roman)

Lv_della_ thompsoni Herting

Macrocentrus gifuensis Ashm.
Phaeogenes nigridens Wesm.
Sympiesis viridula (Thorns.)

Collyria calcitrator (Grav.)
Aphidus testaceipes (Cresson)
Hippodamia convergens Guer.

Pedobius metalicus (Nees)


Apanteles glomeratus (L.)
The East
Aphidus smithi S. & A.
Hippodamia convergens Guer.

Anagyrus antoninae Timb.
Dusmetia sangwani Rao
Aphelinus semiflavus How.
Praon palitans Mues.

Agathis stigmatera  (Cress.)
Lixophaga diatraeae (Tns.)

Paratheresia claripalpis
  (V.d.W.)

Trioxys utilis Mues.
                                           342

-------
TABLE G-8  (Continued)
           PEST
WHERE FOUND
                                                                  PARASITE OR PREDATOR
                                 TREE AND SHRUB INSECTS
     Balsam woolly aphid,
      Chermes piceae Ratz.
    Barnacle scale,
      Ceroplastes cirripediformis
       Corns t.

    Birch leaf-mining sawfly,
      Heterarthrus nemoratus  (Fall.)
    Browntail moth,
      Nygmia phaeorrhoea  (Donov.)
    Browntail moth,—Cont.
      Nygmia phaeorrhoea  (Donov.)
    Citrophilus mealybug,
      Pseudococcus gahani Green
        (see Fruit Insects)

    Citrus mealybug,
      Pseudococcus citri  (Risso)
        (see Fruit Insects)

    Elm leaf beetle,
      Galerucella xanthomelaena
        (SchrJ

    European earwig,
      Forficula auricularia L.
        (also general-nuisance pest)

    European elm scale,
      Gossyparia spuria (Mod.)

    European pine sawfly,
      Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.)
East and West
Coasts
Southern coastal
areas, California,
and Hawaii

 Northern New
 England
New England
New England
California
California
Pacific States
and the East
Eastern
 Seaboard and the
 West

The East and
California

New England,
New Jersey
Aphidoletes thompsoni Mohn.
Cremifania nigrocellulata Cz.
Laricobius erichsonii Rosen.
Leucopis obscura Hal.
Scymnus impexus Muls.

Scutellista cyanea Mots.
Chrysocharis laricinellae
  (Ratz.)
Phanomeris phyllotomae Mues.

Apanteles lacteicolor Vier
Carabus auratus L.
Carcelia laxifrons Vill.
Eupteromalus nidulans
  (Thorns.)

Exorista larvarum (L.)
Meteorus versicolor (Wesm.)
Monodontomerus aereus Wlkr.
Townsendicellomyia nidicola
  
-------
TABLE G-8  (Continued)
        PEST
                                        WHERE FOUND
                        PARASITE OR PREDATOR
                         TREE AND SHRUB  INSECTS .—Continued
   European pine shoot moth,
     Rhyacionia buoliana  (Schiff.)
   European spruce sawfly,
     Diprion hercyniae  (Htg.)

   Gypsy moth,
     Porthetria dispar  (L.)
       (see Fruit  Insects)
   Japanese beetle,
     Popillia japonica Newm.
       (see Fruit Insects and Field
       and Garden Insects)

   Larch casebearer,
     Colephora laricella (Hbn.)
   Long-tailed mealybug,
     Pseudococcus adonidum  (L.)
       (see Fruit Insects)

   Nigra scale,
     Saissetia nigra  (Nietn.)

   Olive scale,
     Parlatoria oleae  (Colvee)
       (See Fruit Insects)

   Oriental moth,
     Cnidocampa flavescens  (Wlkr.)

   Satin moth,
     Stilpnotia salicis  (L.)
   Walnut aphid,
     Chromaphis juglandicola  (Kalt.)
      (see Fruit Insects)
Northeast,
North Central
States, and
Washington
Upper New
England

New England,
New York, New
Jersey, and
Pennsylvania

The East
Eastern half of
 U.S.
Citrus-growing
areas
California


California



Massachusetts
New England
Washington, and
Oregon

Pacific Coast
States, Utah,
and Idaho
Temelucha interrupter Grav.

Orgilus obscurator  (Ness)

Tetrastichus turionum (Htg.)

Dahlbominus fuscipennis
  (Zett.)
Agathis pumila (Ratz.)
Chrysocharis laricinellae
  (Ratz)
Aphycus helvolus Comp.
Chaetexorista javana B. & B.
Apanteles solitarius (Ratz.)
Meteorus versicolor (Wesm.)
   Source:  Agricultural Research  Service, U.S.D.A.  (Modified)
                                     344

-------
               6.  Sterility Approach to Insect Control
        The use of insect  sterilization to control and eradicate pest
 populations is one of the revolutionary departures of modern
              54-57
 entomology.         There are two ways by which the sterility principle
 might be used to help control or eradicate insects.  One involves
 rearing,  sterilization and release into the natural population so that
 the sterile members will compete with normal ones and thus lower the
 reproduction rate.   Early experiments in sterilizing insects employed
 x-rays, but the first attempts at sterilizing insects as a control
 measure utilized irradiation with gamma rays from a cobalt-60
 source.  A theoretical model involving such a release  procedure is
 given in Table G-9.  It is assumed that the natural population exists
 in an isolated area containing a stable population of 2 million insects
 with a 1:1 ratio of males to females in equilibrium with the environ-
 ment and with the  biotic potential canceled out by environmental
 resistance.  Each generation,  2 million sterile males would be
 released in this area to compete equally for mates.  By the fourth
 generation, the ratio of sterile to fertile males competing for each
 virgin female would  be 1, 807 to 1; with equal competition 99. 95% of
 these matings would be  sterile.54
        The other method  is to treat and sterilize insects in the
 natural population to reduce reproduction.  The chemical compounds
which reduce or  entirely eliminate the  reproductive  capacity are
 called chemosterilants.  Chemosterilants may affect only one sex
(male sterilants,  female sterilant) or both sexes  (male-female
 sterilants).  United States Department of Agriculture entomologists
and chemists have screened 3, 000 materials and  have found  that at
least 50 of them  produce sterility in insects.  Apholate  and Aphoxide
are among the most  active chemosterilants currently under
                              345

-------
        Table G-9 Theoretical Population Decline in Each Subsequent Generation When a Constant Number of Sterile Males
                       Are Released Among a Natural Population of 1 Million Females and 1 Million Males
                                                                                                       54
Peneration
 Number of virgin
females in the area
Number of sterile males
released each generation
   Ratio of sterile to
fertilr males competing
   for each virgin
        female         to
Percentage of
females mated
sterile males
Theoretical popu-
lation of fertile
females each sub-
sequent generation
Fl
F2
F3
F4
1,000,000
333,333
47,619
1,107
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2 :
6 :
42 :
1,807 :
1
1
1
1
66.7
85.7
97.7
99.95
333,333
47,619
1,107
Less than 1
 U)
 4k
 tfl
      Source:  Knipling,  E.  F.

-------
 investigation.55  When administered orally or by contact these compounds


 produce irreversible  sterility without apparent adverse effects on the


 mating behavior and length of life of the insects.



        Insects on which sterility information is available57 and which


 are ready for field testing are listed  in Table G-10.



        a.  Eradication Program of the Screw Worm Fly in the

           Southeastern States



        Screw worms were brought to the vanishing point by the release


 of 100 sterile males per square mile per week on Sanibel Island near


 Fort Myers, Florida, but eradication could not be proved because the


 test area was not sufficiently isolated to prevent immigration of a few


 fertilized females from nearby untreated areas.  The other experiment


 was performed on the island of Curacao56 where eradication was


 achieved on that isolated  170 square mile island.  The apparent


 eradication of the screw worms from Curacao supported the theory


 that screw worms could be eradicated from the southeastern  states by


 by releasing sterilized flies.  In July  1958, a huge sterilized fly


 production facility was completed at Sebring,  Florida.  This  establishment


 produced 50 million sterilized flies  per week, which were distributed


 over all infested areas in the Southeast (Florida,  Georgia,  Alabama,


 Mississippi, South Carolina, North Carolina).  By 1958, the  screw-


 worm had been eliminated from the Southeastern states,  the major


 part of the Continental United  States in which this pest can overwinter,

                                                        5ft
 and no infestations of  screw worms have since occurred.



       The  screw worms were irradicated with gamma-rays  using a


 cobalt 60 source.59  The 7500  roentgens dose was adopted as  standard


for eradication programs.  In laboratory experiments, the  radiation-


induced sterility was permanent and the sterilized males were


competitive with normal males in cage-mating experiments.
                              347

-------
     TABLE G-10 Insects on which sterility information is  available
                 and which are ready for field testing.
    Scientific Name
        Common Name
Anastrepha ludens (Loew)
Ceratitis capitata (Wied)
Dacus cucurbitae Coq.
Dacus dorsalis (Hendel)
Anastrepha suspensa
Anastrepha fraterculus Wied.
Dacus tryoni (Froyg.)
Drosophila spp.
Dacus oleae (Gmelin)
Glossina morsitans (Westwood)
Glossina austeni (Newstead)
Hylemya antiqua (Meig)
Aedes aegypti
Aedes scutellaris
Culex pipiens fatigans Wied.
Anopheles gambiae
Dertnatobia hominis (Linnaeus)
Haematobia irritans  (Linnaeus)
Musca domestica (Linnaeus)
Authonomus grandis (Bol.)
Oryctes rhinoceros L.
Acanthoscelides obtectus Say
Melolontha vulgaris F.
Carpocapsa pomonella L.
Diatraea saccharalis (F.)
Leucoptera coffeella
Heliothio virescens  (F.)
Heliothio zeae (Boddie)
Chilo suppressalis Walker
Pectinophera gonypiella (Saunders)
Dysdercus peruvianus C.
Popillia japonica (Newm.)
Protoparce sexta (Ich.)
Trichoplusia ni
Mexican fruit fly
Mediterranean fruit fly
Melon fly
Oriental fruit fly
Carribean fruit fly
South American fruit fly
Queensland fruit fly
Vinegar flies
Olive fly
Tsetse fly
Tsetse fly
Onion fly
Yellow fever mosquito
Vector of filariasis (mosquito)
Vector of filariasis (mosquito)
Vector of malaris (mosquito)
Torsalo, human bot fly
Hornfly
House fly
Boll weevil
Rhinoceros beetle
Bean weevil
Cockchafer
Codling moth
Sugar cane borer
Coffee leaf miner
Tobacco budworm
Cotton bollworm
Rice-stem borer
Pink bollworm
Cotton red stainer
Japanese beetle
Hornworm
Cabbage looper
 Source:  International Atomic Energy Agency (Modified).
                                  348

-------
        Further applications of the same techniques are now being tried

 with other pests.  These are being combined with chemosterilants and

 genetic male sterile forms.

      b.  Eradication of the Cotton Bollworm From St. Croix,
          U. S. Virgin Islands

        Eradication of the cotton bollworm,  Heliothis zea (Boddie).  from

 St.  Croix, U.  S.  Virgin Islands,  was attempted in 1968 and 1969, using

 the  sterile-male  release method.60 Although both attempts  failed in the

 primary objective of eradicating the species, the reasons were the

 high ratios of  sterile to  natural males which caused the elimination of

 oviposition,  and high degree of locking between the released population

 and  the native females.

        c.  Eradication  of Cotton Boll Weevil in the Southeast

        A truly effective  chemosterilant for  the boll weevil has not yet

 been discovered.  Some  of the aziridinyl compounds, particularly

 apholate, induce  a rather high degree of sterility in the males,  but the

 mortality of treated insects  is high and their competitiveness is

 reduced.61  During 1962, Apholate sterilized male boll weevils

 Anthonomus grandis, normal males and virgin untreated females were

 released in three experimental one acre  plots of cotton in Virginia,

 Tennessee, and Louisiana in the ratio of 20:1:1  in each of five uniformly

 distributed points.  A total  of 8, 850 sterile  males released over an

 eight week period,  prevented matings between the ensuing Fa, males

 and females.   On the seventeenth week of the experiment,  no egg or

feeding punctures were found in two examinations of all the squares

and bolls on plants in the field. Only  in the  Louisiana experiment

was  eradication of the population achieved.62 The successful eradication

in 1962 of an artificially induced infestation  of boll weevils prompted
                                349

-------
further studies.  From June 17 through August 26, 1964, eleven


weekly releases of apholate sterilized male boll •weevils were made in



nine cotton fields that had been treated with insecticides in the fall



of 1963,  to reduce  the population of diapausing weevils.  An average



of 8, 200 males were released  per acre.  This was done in  Baldwin



County,  east of Mobile,  Alabama.  This  release  program reduced the



number of oviposition punctured squares.  Also,  the  percentage of



infertile eggs,  the  number of live immature and adult weevils per



acre in fruit,  numbers of over-wintered  adults and the  levels of



infestation during the  second year were considerably lower in the



release zone than in the zone treated  intensively  with insecticides.




       Effectiveness of apholate in decreasing the sperm viability of



the male boll weevil was  determined   in Mississippi by allowing  the



weevils to feed on a diet containing from 0. 001 to 0. 020 percent of the



chemosterilant and on plants sprayed with  0.5 and 2.5 percent solutions.



After both treatments,  virgin females mated to treated males oviposited



eggs with decreased hatchability and emergence of the F\,  progeny.



At the higher levels of treatment,  longevity of males was reduced.



Repeated spray applications of the chemosterilant to  plants, especially



at the higher levels,  caused phytotoxicity manifested by leaf necrosis,



stunting  of growth and cessation of square  production.  The male



boll weevil can also be sterilized with TEPA, either  by feeding 1, 500 ppm



in the diet for two days or by an injection of 3. 5 mg.64  Lower levels



of TEPA produced  transitory sterilization.  At the effective levels,



mortality was significant.




  d.  Control  of House Flies with Chemosterilant Baits in Florida




       Three  compounds, aphoxide, aphomide, and apholate  caused
               ;»


sterility in male and female house flies at  concentrations of 1 percent
                                 350

-------
 to 0.5 percent in food given to the adults.65  Of 97 percent compounds
 administered in granulated sugar or in fly food tested in Florida, only
 27 percent caused sterility in adult house filies,  Musca domestica L.66

        Corn meal baits containing 0.5 percent of aphoxide (1-Aziridinyl
 Phosphine Oxide), a chemosterilant,  were applied on an isolated refuse
 dump in the Florida Keys for the control of house flies, Musca
 domestica L.  Applications were made  each day during the second  week.
 House fly populations were reduced from 47 per grid to zero within
 four weeks and the percent hatch among all eggs  laid was reduced to
 one percent within five weeks.67  House fly baits containing 0. 5 percent
 of metepa (methaphoxide tris-(2-methyl-1-aziridinyl) phosphine oxide)
 were applied to the  droppings in a poultry house in the  suburbs of
 Orlando,  Florida, for the control of. house flies.   Applications were
 first made at weekly intervals for nine weeks, then semi-weekly.
 Granular baits with corn meal as a carrier were the  most effective
                                             6&
 and vermiculite granules, were unsatisfactory.

       A corn bait containing 0.75 percent of Apholate  was applied on
 a dump at Pine Island,  Florida for the control of house flies.
 Applications  were made over a week for seven consecutive weeks,
 then five times each week for seven consecutive weeks, then five
 time each week for five weeks.   The fly population decreased  from
 68 per grid to 5 to 20 during the  first seven weeks and remained
 between 0 and 3 per grid the following five  weeks.69

     e.  Preliminary Work with Chemosterilants for  Important
         Noctuids in Georgia

       The corn earworm,  Heliothis zea (Boddie); the armyworm,
Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haworth);  and the granulate cutworm,
Feltia subterranea (F. ), can be  sterilized with TEPA.  Males of each
                             351

-------
 species are sterilized when they are fed 53 mg of TEPA  in a 10 percent



 sucrose solution.  A dose in excess of 106 mg is required to sterilize



 female corn earworms and a dose of more than 53 mg to sterilize



 female army worms and granulate cutworms.70 Sterilization of the fall



 armyworm by a apholate and TEPA has also been reported.71





        Insect  sterility,  a new technique  is offering promise for many



 major agricultural pests of southeastern U.  S.  including the boll weevil,



 bollworm, budworm, and pink bollworm.  Much research and field



 experiments must be conducted  on each pest problem to determine if



 this approach will be useful in an expanded practical control program.





                  7.  Insect Attractant and Repellants




       Many insects find their food, their partners for mating and favor-



able sites in which to deposit their eggs by means of automatic response



to various  scent clues.   Male moths for example,  can smell potential



sexual partners at a considerable distance.  Not surprisingly, each spe-



cies tends  to have its own distinctive odor which facilitates the meeting



of partners capable  of mating.  The survival and adaptation of many insect



species depend on these odors.   Frequently they can be attracted by means



of a chemical attractant to a trap for pest detection purposes or to a toxi-



cant that destroys them,  or  to a substance which makes them incapable of


               72
fertile mating.





       Attractants have been classified into three categories; sex, food,



and oviposition lures.  The type of lure is  inferred or deduced from insect



behavior and the  designation given to such response is frequently uncer-



tain.  If exposure to a chemical  causes a male insect to assume a mating



posture, the chemical is probably a sex attractant,  even if it is a synthe-



tic and unrelated to  any  natural lure.  Some entomologists believe that



methyleugenol, the attractant for the oriental fruit fly (Dacus dorsolis



Hendel), is a  sex attractant because the  chemical attracts only the male.
                                352

-------
However, it appears to be a food lure,  because the flies avidly devour

the chemical. 73 The insects in which female lures male and conversely,

males lure  or excite the  females are presented in Table G-ll and Table
G-12  respectively. ^4

        The use of food-based or fermenting lures has a definite place in

control operations.   Disadvantages include lack of specificity  (traps fill

with many kinds of insects),  attraction over only  a short distance,  rapid

deterioration (especially of fermenting lures), and frequently  inconsistent

performance.  In regard to oviposition lures,  females have been induced

to lay their eggs on, or in the vicinity of,  certain chemicals.  Materials

that release ammonia are known to encourage oviposition in house flies.
                                                                           73
The apple maggot is attracted to decomposing proteins,  such as egg albumin.


        Chemical attractants  and associated agents, such as stimulants and
assertants  have been widely used for many years  in studies of insect be-

havior.  They have  served many useful purposes  as lures in traps, for ex-
ample:

        •  To sample insect populations, to determine relative densities
          from  time to time and from place to place.

        •  To trace the movement of marked insects in dispersion and mi-
          gration studies.
        •  To study survival of insects in their natural environments.

        •  To study behavior associated with the search  for mates and ovi-
          positions sites.

        In the search for  selective methods of insect control, many entomio-

logists and  plant protection personnel are  seeking chemicals which elicit

repellence.  A repellent  is a chemical that causes an insect to make
                                           O
oriented movements  away from  its  source. °  The distance  the insect need

move, however, is usually much shorter than the distance  it does  move in

response  to an attractant.  Ordinarily,  it need only leave or avoid a

treated surface  or at most move a few centimeters  out of the effective

concentration of repellent vapor.  Less use has been made of repellents
                               353

-------
            TABLE  G-llINSECTS IN WHICH FEMALES LURE THE MALES
    Order
    Scientific  Name
   Common Name
Orthoptera
Lepidoptera
Blaberus craniifer
  (Burmeister)
Blaberus giganteus (L.)
Byrsotria fumigata (Guerin)
Leucophaea maderae (F.)
Mantis religiosa (L.)
Nauphoeta cinerea (Olivier)
Periplaneta atnericana  (L.)

Periplaneta australasiae
  (Fabricius)
Periplaneta brunnea
  (Burmeister)
Periplaneta fuliginosa
  (Serville)

Achroea grisella (Fabricius)
Achroea sp.
Acronicta psi (L.)
Giant death's head
  roach

Cockroach
Cockroach
Praying mantis
Cockroach
American cockroach

Australian cockroach
                   Actias caja (L.)
                   Actias selene (Hiibner)

                   Actias villica  (L.)

                   Agathymus baueri (Stallings
                     & Turner)
                   Agathymus polingi
                     (Skinner)
                   Aglia tau (L.)
                   Agrotis fimbria (L.)
                   Agrotis ypsilon (Hufnagel)
                   Antheraea pernyi
                     (Guerin-Meneville)
                   Antheraea (Telea)  poly-
                     phemus (Cramer)
                   Aphomia gularis (Zeller)
                   Argynnis adippe (L.)
                   Argynnis euphrosyne (L.)
                   Argynnis latonia (L.)
                   Argynnis paphia (L.)
Lesser wax moth
                                     Garden tiger moth
                                     Cream-spot tiger moth
                                     Nailspot

                                     Black cutworm



                                     Polyphemus moth


                                     Pearl-bordered
                                       fritillary


                                     Emperor's cloak
                                   354

-------
TABLE G-ll  (Continued)
   Order
      Scientific Name
                                                                 Common Name
Lepidopetra
    (Contd.)
Autographa californica
  (Speyer)
Bombyx mori  (L.)
Cacoecia murinana (Hb.)
Caligula japonica (Butler)
Callimorpha dominula (L.)
Callimorpha dominula per-
  sona (Hbn.)
Callosamia promethea
  (Drury)
Carpocapsa pomonella (L.)
Celaena haworthii (Curtis)
Chaerocampa elpenor (L.)
Clysia ambiguella (Hubner)
Colocasia coryli (L.)
Colotois pennaria (L.)
Cossus robinjae (Pek.)
Cucullia argentea (Hufnagel)
Cucullia verbasci (L.)
Dasychira fascelina (L.)
Dasychira horsfieldi (Saund.)
Dasychira pudibunda (L.)
Dendrolinus pini (L.)
Diatrae saccharalis (F.)
Endromis versicolora (L.)
Ephestia cautella (Walker)
Ephestia elutella (Hubner)
Ephestia kiihniella (Zeller)

Eumeta crameri (Westw.)
Euproctis chrysorrhoea (L.)
Eupterotida fabia (Cram.)
Eupterotida undulata (Blanch.)
Galleria mellonella (L.)
Graphotitha molesta (Busck)

Harrisima brillians
  (B. & McD.)
Heliothis, virescens (F.)
Alfalfa looper
Silkworm moth
                                                               Scarlet tiger moth
                                                               Promethea moth
                                                               Codling moth
                                                               Haworth's minor

                                                               Grape berry moth
                                                               Silver monk
                                                               Brown monk
                                                               Pale tussock moth

                                                               Sugarcane borer
                                                               Kentish glory moth
                                                               Almond moth
                                                               Tobacco moth
                                                               Mediterranean
                                                                 flour moth

                                                               Gold tail moth
                                                               Greater wax moth
                                                               Oriental fruit
                                                                 moth
                                                               Western grape
                                                                 leaf skeletonizer
                                                               Tobacco budworm
                                      355

-------
TABLE  G-ll (Continued)
    Order
      Scientific Name
  Common Name
Lepidoptera
  (Contd.)
Heliothis zea (Boddie)
                            Heterusia cingala  (Moore)
                            Hyalophora cecropia  (L.)
                            Hyalophora colleta
                            Hyalophora euryalus
                               (Boisduval)
                            Hypocrita jacobaeae  (L.)
                            Hypogymna morio  (L.)
                            Laphygma frugiperdji
                               (J. E. Smith)
                            Lasiocampa quercus (L.)
                            Lasiocampa trifolii  (Schiff.)
                            Lobesia  (Polychrosis)
                              jtotrana (Schiff.)
                            Lymantria ampla  (Walker)
                            Mahasena graminivora
                               (Hampson)
                            Malacosoma neustria  (L.)
                            Metopsilus porcellus  (L.)
                            Micropteryx  spp.
                            Orgyia antiqua  (L.)
                            Orgyia  ericae  (Germ.)
                            Orgyia  gonostigma
                               (Fabricius)
                            Parasemia plantaginis  (L.)
                            Pectinophora gossypiella
                               (Saunders)
                            Phalera bucephala  (L.)
                            Plodia  interpunctella
                               (Hubner)
                            Porthesia similis  (Fuessly)
                            Porthetria  (Lymantria)
                               dispar  (L.~)
                            Porthetria  dispar  japonica
                               (Motsch)
                            Porthetria  (Lymantria)
                               monacha (L.)
Bollworm, corn
  earworm, to-
  mato fruitworm

Cecropia moth

Ceanothus silk
  Moth
Cinnabar moth

Fall armyworm

Oak eggar moth
Grass eggar moth
                                  Bagworm

                                  Lackey moth
                                  Vapourer moth,
                                    rusty tussock
                                    moth
                                  Wood tiger moth
                                  Pink bollworm
                                    moth
                                  Moonspot

                                  Indian meal moth
                                  Gypsy moth

                                  Gypsy moth

                                  Nun moth
                                      356

-------
TABLE  G-ll  (Continued)
    Order
      Scientific Name
                                                                 Common Name
Lepidoptera
  (Contd.)
Pr.odenia
(Fabricius)
                             Prodenia ornithogalli
                               (Guene"e)
                             Protoparge  sexta (Johannson)
                             Pierostoma  palpina (L.)
                             Ptilophora  jplumigera
                               (Schiff.)
                             Pygaera  curtula (L.)
                             Pygaera  pjgra  (Hufn.)
                            Jlhyacionia  buollana
                               (Schiff.)
                             Rhyacionia  frustrana
                               (Cornstock)
                             Rothschildia orizaba
                               (Westwood)
                             Samia  cynthia  (Drury)
                             Sanninoidea exitosa (Say)
                             Saturnia carpinj. (Schiff.)
                             Saturnia pavonia (L.)

                             Saturnia pavonia minor  (L.)

                             Saturnia pyri  (L.)
                             Smerinthus  ocellatus  (L.)
                             Solenobia fumosella (Hein.)
                             Solenobia lichenella (L.)
                             Solenobia seileri (Sauter)
                             Solenobia triquetrella  (Hbn.)
                             Sphinx ligustri (L.)
                             Spilosoma lutea (Hufn.)
                             Spodoptera  exigua  (Hiibner)
                             Stilpnotia  salicis  (L.)
                             Svnanthedon pictipes
                               (Grote &  Robinson)
                            Tineola  biselliella  (Hummel)

                            Trabala  vishnu  (Lef.)
                            Trichoplusia ni (Hubner)
                                  Egyptian cotton
                                    leaf worm
                                  Yellow-striped
                                    armyworm
                                  Tobacco hornworm
                                  Snout spinner
                                  Pine shoot moth
                                  Nantucket pine
                                    tip moth

                                  Orizaba silk moth
                                  Cynthia moth
                                  Peach tree borer

                                  Emperor moth,
                                    peacock moth
                                  Lesser peacock
                                    moth

                                  Eyed hawk moth
                                  Privet hawk moth
                                  Buff ermine moth
                                  Beet armyworm
                                  Satin moth
                                  Lesser peach tree
                                    borer
                                  Webbing clothes
                                    moth

                                  Cabbage looper
                                       357

-------
TABLE G-ll   (Continued)
    Order
      Scientific Name
                                    Common Name
Lepidoptera
  (Contd.)
Coleoptera
Vanessa uritcae  (L.)
Zygaena filipendulae  (L.)
Agriotes ferrugineipennis
   (LeConte)
Ctenicera destructor  (Brown)
Ctenicera sylvatica
   (Van dyke)
Diabrotica balteata
   (LeConte)
Dytiscus marginalis (L.)
jiemicrepidius morio
   (Leconte)
Hylecoetus jermestoides  (L.)
Limonius californicus
                            jjimonius sp.
                            Melolontha vulgaris
                               (Fabric ius)
                            Pachypus cornutus  (Olivier)
                            Phvllophaga lanceolata (Say)
                            Rhopaea magnicornis
                               (Blackburn)
                            Rhopaea wrreauxi
                               (Blanchard)
                            Telephorus rufa  (L. )
                            Tenebrio molitor (L.)
Six-spot burnet
  moth

Click beetle

Click beetle
Click beetle

Banded cucumber
  beetle
Sugar-beet wire
  worm
Wir eworm
                                  June beetle
                                  Yellow mealworm
Hymenoptera
Apis mellifera  (L.)
Bracon  hebetor  (Say)
   (=Habrobracon juglandis)
Crabro  cribrarius  (L.)
Dasymutilla  spp.
jiprion similis (Hartig)

Gorytes campestris  (L.)
Honey bee

Wasp
Wasp
Velvet ant
Introduced pine
  sawfly
Wasp
                                        358

-------
TABLE  G-ll   (Continued)
    Order
      Scientific Name
                                                                 Common Name
Hymenoptera
   (Contd.)
Gorytes jnystaceu.s  (L.)
Macrocentrus ancylivora
  (Rohwer)
Macrocentrus gifuensis
  (Ashmead)
Macropis labiata  (Fabricius)
Megarhvssa atrat;a
  (Fabricius)
Megarhvssa inquisitor (Say)
Megarhvssa lunator  (L.)
Neodiprion lecontei (Fitch)

Neodiprion pratti pratti
  (Dyar)
Praon palitans  (Muesebeck)
Pristiphora con-jugata
  (Dahlb.)
                                                               Red-headed pine
                                                                 sawfly
                                                               Virginia-pine
                                                                 sawfly
                                                               Sawfly
 Diptera
Culiseta inornata  (Williston)     Mosquito
Drosophila melanogaster
   (Meigen)
Musca domestica  (L.)              House fly
Phytophaga destructor  (Say)       Hessian fly
 Isoptera
Reticulitermes arenincola
   (Coellner)
Reticulitermes flavipes
   (Kollar)
                                                               Termite
                                                               Eastern subter-
                                                                 ranean termite
  Source:   Jacobson, M.
                                         359

-------
                       TABLE G-12.  INSECTS IN WHICH MALES LURE OR
                                     EXCITE THE FEMALES.
                                                        74
    Order
      Scientific Name
Common Name
Orthoptera
Byrsotrla fumigata (Gue'rin)       Cockroach
Eurycotis floridana (Walker)
Leucophaea maderae (F.)           Cockroach
Hemiptera
Lethocerus indicus (Lepetier &
  Serville) (=Belo9toma indiea)
Rhoecocoris sulciventris (Stal.)
                                                              Giant water bug
                                                              Bronze  orange  bug
Lepidoptera
Achevontia atropos (L.)
Achroca grisella (Fabricius)
Aphomia gularis^ (Zeller)
Argynnis adippe (L)
Argynnis aglaja (L.)
Argynnis paphia (L.)
Caligo arisbe (Hbn.)
Colias edusa (Fabricius)
Danaus plexippus (L.)
Elymnias undularis (Dru.)
Ephestia cautella  (Walker)
Ephestia elut ella  (Hiibner)
Erynnis^ t_ages_ (L.)
Eumenis semele (L.)
Euploca phaenar eta (Schall.)
Euploca sp.
Eurytides protesilaus (L).
Galleria mellonella (L.)
                                                              Lesser wax moth
                                                              Emperor's cloak
                                                              Monarch butterfly

                                                              Almond moth
                                                              Tobacco moth
                                                              Greater wax moth
                            Hepialus behrensi  (Stretch.)
                            Hepialus hectus  (L.)
                            Hipparchia semele  (L.)
                            Lethe rohria  (F.)
                            Lycaena spp.
                            Mvcalesis suaveolens
                               (W.-M. & N.)
                            Qpsiphanes invirae  isagoras  (Fruhst.)
                            Otosema odorata  (L.)
                            Panlymnas chrysippus  (L.)
                            Papilio aristolochiae  (F.)
                            Pechipogon barbalis  (CL.)
                            Phassus schamyl  (Chr.)
                            Phlogophora meticulosa  (L.)
                            Pieris napi (L.)
                                  Grayling butterfly
                            Pieris rapae  (L.)
                            Plodia interpunctella  (Hvibner)
                            Sphinx ligustri (L.)
                                  Angleshade moth
                                  Mustard white
                                  Imported cabbage  worm
                                  Indian meal moth
                                  Privet hawk moth
                                         360

-------
TABLE  G-12   Continued.
    Order
      Scientific Name
                                                                 Common Name
Lepidoptera
   (Contd.)
Stichophthalma camadeva
  (Westw.)
Svrichtus malva.e (L.)
Terias hecabe fimbriata (Wall.)
Tineola biselliella  (Hummel)

Xvlophasia monoKlypha
  (Hufn.)
                                                               Webbing clothes
                                                                 moth
                                                               Dark arch moth
Coleoptera
Anthonomus grandis
  (Boheman)
Boll weevil
Malachiidae bettles
 Hymenoptera


 Diptera
Bombus terrestris  (L.)
Ceratitis capitata (Wied.)

Drosophila melanogaster
   (Meigen)
Drosophila victoria
   (Sturtevant)
Bumble bee
Mediterranean
  fruit fly
 Mecoptera
Harpobittacus australis  (Klug)    Scorpion fly
Harpobittacus nigriceps  (Selys)   Scorpion fly
 Neuroptera
                             Osmvlus chrysops (L.)
  Source:   Jacobson, M.
                                        361

-------
for the protection of animals and plants than for the protection of man.
For humans these have been skin repellents,  systemic repellents,  and
repellents for clothing treatment.
       Ultimately the best attractants (based on laboratory findings) must
be tested in the field where they must prove effective despite a multitude
of natural odors, colors,  light conditions, and weather. ?3, 75, 76  Examples
of some  potent synthetic attractants are listed in Table G-13
      a.  Use of Synthetic Attractants in Control and Eradication
               of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Florida
       In 1956,  the  Mediterranean fruit fly (med-fly) reappeared in Florida
after  an  absence of  26 years.  Following its initial eradication in 1929-30,
the on-tree annual value of the citrus crop had climbed to about 250 million
dollars and that of all other commercial hosts of this pest was many
million dollars more.  It was estimated that if these flies were  not eradicated
the combined annual cost of control efforts,  fumigation of exported fruit,
and maintenance of  quarantine and  road blocks would approximate 20 million
dollars exclusive of crop losses and decrease of consumer acceptance of
the state's citrus products.
       Quick action by state and federal agencies (Plant Pest Control and
Entomology Research Branch, U.  S. Department of Agriculture) and in-
dustry,  along with good public support, made it possible to establish effec-
tive curtailment and eradication programs in a minimum of time.   The
eradication effort was a complete success (Table G-14).
       The general plan for state-wide eradication was to apply aerial
sprays to known infested areas and strips one-half mile adjacent to these
areas.   The spray contained 1 Ib. of protein hydrolysate and 2 Ibs. of 25%
malathion per acre. The  spray was applied on a 10-day schedule,  but later
the coverage was on at a 7-day schedule because of rainy conditions.
                                 362

-------
       Lures and detection methods comprised of angelica oil,  Siglure

and esters of cyclohexene carboxylic acid on cotton dental roll wicks with

3% DDVP (another phosphorus insecticide). A 25% lindane and  40% chlor-

dane wettable powder was applied bi'-weekly at 1/4 teaspoon per trap to

prevent ant and spider  depredation  and to assist in fly kill.  The traps were

placed at the rate of 10 to 40 per square miles preferably in med-fly hosts.

The number of traps was increased after a larval or adult find.   The trap

servicing was done  on two to three  weeks schedules.   Traps aided in

determining the effectiveness of the bait spray.

       The cost of the  program was $11 million.  Among the most impor-

tant results of this research were the development:
       •  Of highly effective lures  for use in bait traps.  These served
           as indicators of the presence of the flies in a given location
           and as a  measure of the  progress toward eradication.
       •  Of attractive materials which could be combined with insecti-
           cides in bait sprays.
                                363

-------
             TABLE G-13  Potent  Attractants Made  Synthetically
                                                                73
  Common Name
  Species Attracted
Other Species Attracted
Methyleugenol3


Anisylacetone



Cue-lurea
Siglure
Medlure
Frontalure
Trimedlurea
Natural lure of
 gypsy moth3
Gyplure


Bombykol


Butyl sorbatea
Methyl
 linolenate3
Oriental fruit fly
 (Dacus dorsalis)

Melon fly (Dacus
 cucurbitae)
Melon fly (Dacus
 cucurbitae)
Melon fly (Dacus
 cucurbitae)

Mediterranean fruit fly
 (Ceratitis capitata)

Mediterranean fruit fly
 (Ceratitis capitata)

Southern pine beetle
 (Dendroctrotonus fron-
  talis)
Mediterranean fluit fly
 (Ceratitis capitata)
Gypsy moth (Porthetria
 dispar)

Gypsy moth (Porthetria
 dispar)

Silkworm worth
 (Bombyx mori)

European chafer
 (Amphimallon majalis)

Bark beetles
 (Ips typographus)
 (Hylurgops glabratus)
    Dacus umbrosus
    Queensland fruit fly
     (D. tryoni)
     (I), ocbrosiae)

    Queensland fruit fly
     (I), tryoni)
     (D. ocbrosiae)
    Walnut husk fly
     (Rhagoletis completa)
    Western pine beetle
     (I), brevicomis)
     Douglad fir (D.
     pseudotsuge)

    Natal fruit fly
     (Pterandrus rosa)
                                 364

-------
TABLE  G-13  (Continued)
   Common Name            Species Attracted      Other Species Attracted
Grandlure               Cotton  boll weevil
                        Anthnomous grandis Boheman
         effective  lure  for  insect under  "Species Attracted" column.

    Source:   Beroza,  M. and Green, N.  (Modified).
                                   365

-------
           Table G-14. Status of Bait-Spray and Trap Operations for Eradication
       of the Mediterranean fruit fly in Florida. 1
                              Acres Sprayed by Air
Date or
Period
Ending
1956
June 30
July 31
Aug. 31
Sept. 30
Oct. 31
Nov. 30a
Dec. 31b
1957
Feb. 28
Apr. 30
June 30C
Aug. 31
Oct. 31
Dec. 31
1958
Feb. 28
Counties
Being
Sprayed

19
24
23
19
16
14
14

11
5
6
2
1
1

0
Currently

328,309
602,381
239,646
215,506
168,485
106,820
38,055

24,580
11,530
31,100
3,500
1,400
4,600

0
Cumulative
Coverage

495,541
1,996,000
3,321,091
4,022,141
4,921,715
5,510,613
5,787,193

6,168,696
6,324,529
6,572,925
6,723,052
6,747,592
6,787,653

6,805,000
No. of
Traps
In use

4,000
17,000
18,100
34,157
39,503
45,060
45,801

45,026
47,810
48,760
36,978
27,757
23,722

25,197
Flies
Per 1,000
Trap-Days

122,500
7,490
3,780
0,882
0,475
0,161
0,027

0,037
0,051
0,033
0,002
0,001
0,004

0
     aHernado (last county found infested)  added.
      Insecticide applications completed in all eastern and  southern  counties.
     cFinal eradication in all counties except Hillsboro,  Lake, Manatee,  Orange,
Pasco, Pinellas, and Polk.

      Source:   Steiner,  L.  E.  et al.
                                        366

-------
       The bait sprays greatly suppressed house flies and mosquitoes
also.   Some species of tropical fish in very shallow water were susceptible
to the  small amounts of malathion in the bait spray.  Apart from this draw-
back,  the eradication program was relatively safe compared to conventional
aerial sprays, and was very effective. ^
              b.  Synthetic Pheromone of the Boll Weevil
       Two terpene alcohols  and two  terpene aldehydes from male boll
weevils, Anthonomous grandis  Boheman.were isolated and identified at the
Mississippi State University in 1969. 78  These compounds are  the compo-
nents of  the pheromone to which only  female boll weevils  respond in labo-
ratory tests.  In bioassays,  mixtures containing all four compounds elicited
a response by females  equivalent to or better than that elicited by live
males. ?9  Absence of either alcohols or the two aldehydes from the mix-
ture resulted in almost complete lack of response.   The response to mix-
tures of  synthetic compounds was  identified to that  obtained from corres-r
ponding mixtures of natural compounds.  The extract of fecal material
of boll weevils (both male and mixed sexes) produced a material highly
attractive to  females but not to males.
       The synthesized pheromone was names Grandlure.  This compound,
however, had a very short life.  Polyethylene glycol increased its  life.
                                                                    80
This stable product became a tool in surveying boll weevil infestation.
          c.  Virgin Female Traps for Introduced Pine Sawfly
       The Pine Sawfly (Diprion similis) is  a pest of eastern white pine.
Once it was observed that large numbers of males swarmed toward females.
Investigations were conducted to determine  whether a sex attractant was
involved.  The wooden traps used consisted of a box (12 X 6 X  1 inches)
with a 2  1/2-inch screened opening in the center. A virgin female  was
placed in the  screened portion and Tanglefoot was spread over the  wooden
portion.   The traps were suspended from trees  in infested areas.  An
average  of 1, 000 males were attracted in each of the eight traps.  Large
                                 367

-------
numbers of males also fell to the ground.  Some females did not attract

males for an unknown reason.   The male response was rapid.  Many

approached within 30 seconds after the traps were  set-up.  Traps set-

up at an angle of 90 degrees to the wind direction at the edge of the woods

were consistently more attractive than those set in dense woods.  Greatest

activity took place from midmorning to sunset.  One trap with a virgin

female exposed from 11 a. m. to  4 p. m.  attracted more than 7, 000 males.

She continued attracting males at approximately 1, 000 per day until she

died on the  fifth day, after  which small numbers were caught for the next
three days.  Males  were lured 200 feet from the forest over an open field.

Chemosterilant-attractant mixtures  can  be effective in reducing or eradi-

cating a field population of this  insect. 74

           d.  Sex Pheromones of the Southern Pine Beetle
                       and Other Bark Beetles

        Epidemics of the southern pine beetle, Dendrochonus frontalis Zimm. ,

have  occurred periodically throughout the  outheast and in parts of Texas.

The standard procedure developed in response to this problem involved

aerial detection of infested pines over intervals of several weeks, followed

by confirmation on the ground and actual control.   The control techniques

consisted of cutting and spraying infested trees  with benzene hexachloride

(BHC) in water or oil.   The trees most recently infested were cut and

sprayed first.  This was to interrupt the otherwise continuing  aggregation

of the southern pine beetle population in  response  to the attractants emanating

from such standing, freshly attacked trees.  The control effect on individual

infestations appeared satisfactory but research revealed that although the

southern pine beetles  did not aggregate on sprayed and felled timbers, their

predators did.  Despite very diligent and persistant efforts the BHC-con-

trol failed to affect the overall population level.  The  results  of further

research suggested that the prescribed control method was in fact,  more

effective against predators, parasites and competitors of the souther pine

beetle than  the target insect; so  BHC-control was  largely abandoned in

early 1969.  The subsequent rapid decline of the southern pine beetle
                               368

-------
epidemic undoubtedly had a complex cause.  The elimination of insecticides
may account for  subsequent resurgence of predators.
       A method presently being tried uses Frontalure [l,  5-dimethyl-6,
8-dioxabicyclo (3. 2. 1) octane, the sex pheromone and 2 parts of d-pinene]
to aggregate southern pine beetle populations on the trees to be harvested
and/or treated with cacodylic acid, which checked brood development but
does not harm non-target insects.  In fact, the  simultaneous aggregation
and survival of predators and competitors has become an integral part of
this method.
       The new method depends, like prior measures, on aerial survey
detection of southern pine beetle activity.  Infestations, however, can be
treated immediately by  the crew performing the ground check.  Few tools
are needed and the amount of chemicals deployed does not surpass gram
quantities per acre.  The reduction in labor  in comparison  with former
control measures is  considerable and environmental pollution is avoided.
The  recommended technique  involves the  following steps:
       •  The cause, extent of  damage, and the number of pines contain-
           ing an active brood of southern pine beetle are determined.
       •  Two to ten non-infested pine trees, near  the most recently at-
           tacked trees  in active infestations, are selected  for baiting
           •with Frontalure.   Two pines seem to be adequate for small
           infestations,  but at large spots  of infestations, up to ten trees
           are baited.  Six caps  containing 1  ml. of Frontalure are at-
           tached on each tree around the circumference at a convenient
           height.  The  large trees are preferred.
       •  The brood is destroyed by injecting cacodylic acid into baited
           trees  and the adjacent trees within 15 to 25 ft. , provided these
           are 6" or  more in size (Diameter at breast height of DBH).
           Cacodylic acid is applied in closely spaced frills made with  an
           ax, at least one foot above the  ground.  The total number of
           trees  present in the spot.
       •  This treatment is followed after two or three weeks with either
           salvage of the treated and infested timber or re-check of the
           infestation, and repetition of the procedure where necessary.
       This  'ground-checking control' is  a typical example  of the point
application of population attractants and especially suits the forestry prac-
                                                81
tices of the large pulpwood industry in southeast.

                                369

-------
       Attractants and related agents may be used in several ways for con-
trolling insects,  as well as for gathering fundamental information about
pest population, which might lead to their control.  By  their use in prac-
tical control programs, insects may be lured into traps and then killed by
an insecticide or by adhesive, etc. ,  or a culture of pathogens may be
mixed with an attractant or feeding stimulant to destroy the pest.  A
chemical may also be used to attract large numbers of  insects that can be
sterilized and released among the  native population to reduce pest numbers.
Attractants are increasingly  finding such uses.
                         8.   Insect Hormones
       Scientists are looking for new chemicals to control pests.   These
should be specific to only a given pest species, non-toxic to man and domes-
tic animals,  biodegradable,  and of such a nature that pests will not be able
to develop resistance.
       One approach involves our rapidly expanding knowledge of how
insects rely upon hormones to regulate their growth, feeding, mating, repro-
duction and diapause or over-wintering. '"  The primary candidate is  the
Juvenile hormone that all insects secrete at certain stages  in their lives. 82
Therefore,  the potential utilization  of this information for insect control
depends  upon the ingenuity with which man can supply a Juvenile hormone
to the insect at an unfavorable stage.   The contact of a last-stage nymph,
larva or pupa with a Juvenile hormone induces morphogentic damage.  This
results in the development of intermediates or monsters which are unable
to mature and die in a short time.
       Subsequent investigations have revealed other important function
of the Juvenile hormone in insects such as,  diapause,  reproduction,  embryo-
                                                        76
genesis,  sex attractant production,  and lipid metabolism.
       The synthetic Juvenile hormone analogue,  Trans,  Trans 10, 11-
Epoxy farnesenic acid methyl ester successfully terminated adult diapause
in several species of Hemiptera, including  the box elder bug and the red
                                370

-------
linden bug. **3  Juvenile hormones are unquestionably deeply involved in
the regulation  of diapause and the possibility exists that more research
may result in the development of antihormones which can prevent or
even induce diapause.
       A male pyrrhocoris treated topically with 1 mg of dichloride com-
pound, synthetic Juvenile hormone,  is able  to transfer  enough of this
chemical to females by contact during mating to induce sterility.    This
novel method of transmitting sterility should have interesting field applica-
tions if similar chemicals affecting insects  other than Pyrrhocoris are
developed.
                   believes that synthetic Juvenile hormone eventually
will prove to be most effective as an egg killer (ovicide).
        Ecdysone  is another insect hormone which has the potential of
becoming a selective insecticide.  This substance initiates ecdysis (shed-
ding of skin) or metamorphosis from one stage to another in the larval or
nymphal development of insects.  Over stimulation with ecdysone results
in repeated metamorphosis without sufficient time for the accumulation
of food reserves  so that eventually the larva or nymph becomes exhausted
and dies.
        From the  foregoing it is obvious that the application of morphogene-
tic compounds to  immature insects can kill them by upsetting their develop
ment.  The practical utilization of these compounds becomes  attractive
with the realization that these hormonal effects are specific to insects.
In addition,  these chemicals have no effect on other forms of life. 76' 82
A further advantage  is that insects cannot develop immunity against the
compounds for if  they did, they would become immune to the hormone
that is essential to part of their life cycle.  Since this discipline of pest
control is  still little explored, specific case studies  are not available.
                                371

-------
                    9.  Integrated Control



       Integrated control combines several agronomic practices and


pest control methods.  The total effect of these combined methods is


synergistic rather than additive; not only does  it reduce the pesticide


pollution problem, but the control obtained is more effective.  Integrated

                                                         Q C
control is predicated on fundamental ecological principles.    The con-


cept includes appropriate combinations of pesticides,  natural enemies,

                                              29
insect pathogens, and cultural treatments, etc.



       The first principle emphasizes the ecosystem which includes


the complex of organisms,  the culture of the crop or animal and the


environment.  The second principle  stresses economic levels.  It


concerns  the population levels at which the pest species cause harm,


damage or constitute a nuisance, and measures directed to keep them


below  detrimental economic levels.  The third principle emphasizes


the importance of avoiding disruptive actions.  Measures must be designed


to give adequate  control in a manner which does not upset some other part

                 86
of the  ecosystem.



     a.  Integrated Control of Cotton Boll Weevil in Southeastern States



       A  large scale experiment is  currently underway to eradicate


the cotton boll weevil, a  meanacing and costly  pest of cotton, in the


southeast.  The test area is 150 miles in diameter and is located  around


Gulfport,  Mississippi. This two-year study runs to July 1,  1973.


At that time researchers will have determined if eradication is feasible,


and what the cost will be. Presently it is estimated that the total cost


of eradication might be about $275 million.



       For the first time treatment involves at least six simultaneous


operations.  These include in-season spray as needed; a series of repro-


duction -  diapause sprays in the fall to prevent overwintering; defoliation;


stalk shredding; and pheromone traps for males to prevent reproduction
                              372

-------
by surviving males.  In addition,  continued experiements with Frego-bract


 weevil resistant cotton, and temik systemic insecticide will be part of


 the  research.  The chief weapon will be diapause control by a series of


 up to seven fall sprays applied mainly by five helicopters in the core


 zone,  Columbia, Mississippi,  and the first buffer zone, spilling over


 slightly into Alabama and Louisiana.   Properly timed, this treatment


 can kill up to 99 percent of weevils entering hibernation. Chemicals


 used will be ultra-low-volume  Guthion or Malathion, depending upon


 the environmental hazard involved.  Next spring, adhesive-coated traps


 baited with Grandlure will be placed on fencelines.  These traps should


 catch about 80 percent of emerging weevils.  A single application of


 insecticide before square drop should kill about half of the surviving


 weevils, without permanently suppressing beneficial insect popullations.


 The sterile males will then be  released at 50 to 200 per acre for several


 generations, and theoretically  should reduce the native population by

                                487
 98 percent with each generation. '   If the eradication of the boll weevil


 should eventually be  possible at a cost comparable to  the annual losses


 for just 1 year, such a program w uld be one of the best investments the


 cotton industry could make.   Perhaps  even more  important, the elimination


 of this insect would be the greatest single contribution that could be made


 in the foreseeable future toward the goal of reducing environmental


 pollution caused by the use of broad spectrum insecticides.



                   b.  Integrated Control of Heliothis ;



        Recent theoretical studies not yet published  suggest that the  mass


 production and programmed releases of one or more species of selective


 Heliothis larval parasites could also provide an effective and highly


 selective means of managing Heliothis populations.  Relatively little


 is known about the numerical relationship between parasites and their


 hosts.   However,  based on a theoretical appraisal,  there is good reason


 to believe that it is well within the realm of feasibility to mass produce


 and release sufficient selective parasites to truly manage insect populations
                                373

-------
like the Heliothis species.  This system of insect population management
should have its maximum efficiency when the host insect population is
high and should have diminished efficiency when it is low.   This is just
the reverse of the potential efficiency of the genetic approach.  Therefore,
the parasite release technique and the  genetic technique may eventually
prove to be highly complementary when they are integrated into one system
                4
of suppression.   Insect pathologists are making considerable progress
in developing microbial agents which may further  strengthen their integrated
approach.
     c.  Integrated Control System for  Tobacco Horn
        North Carolina
       Control of Hornworms on Tobacco, Protoparce  sexta (Hohan),
and P. quinquemaculata, with insecticides is not completely satisfactory
in North Carolina.  When Polistes  wasps were induced to nest in shelters
erected around the field, populations of fifth-instar hornworms  were re-
duced by about 60 percent and damage by 76 percent. One-fifth the
recommended rate of insecticides TDE or Endrin, applied as top sprays
gave reliable and adequate control of both hornworms and budworms.
This was true whether  applied every two weeks on a preventive  schedule
                                                  88
or only when  counts indicate treatment was needed.   Such an integrated
program would be more economical than present systems and would
reduce residues  to a fraction of the present levels.
      d.  Integrated Control of Muscid Flies in Poultry Houses in
         Kentucky
       Control of the house fly, Musca domestica  1. , and little  house
fly, Fannia canicularis (L. ), in poultry houses was studied in an integrated
control system in Kentucky employing the predator mites,  Macrocheles
musaedoemsticae (Scopoli) and Fuscuropoda vegetans (De Geer), fly
                                374

-------
larvicides and fly poisbned baits.  Baccilus thuringiensis Berliner was
the most harmless to the mites.  Diazinon gave consistent reduction
of fly larvae and was relatively harmless to the mite populations.  A
parasite nematode,  Neoplectana  carpocapsae Weiser,  was ineffective
largely because of its succeptibility to desiccation.  Adult flies were
                                                                  O Q
effectively controlled with the use of liquid poisoned diazinon baits.
     e.  Integrated Biological and Chemical Control of Aquatic Weeds
        in Florida
        The introduction of the  beetle (Agasicles sp. ) as a biological
control agent has been an added deterrent to the growth of alligatorweed
(Althernanthera philoxeroides Mart. Griseb. ) through the Atlantic Coast
states.  However, floating mats have been controlled in only very small
local areas where herbicides have not been used.   The recommended
chemical control of alligatorweed is 2 or more treatments  of silvex
f2-(2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxy) propionic acid] at 8 Ib/A.  Alligatorweed
may be controlled with less herbicide in the presence of large populations
of alligatorweed flea beetles.   A dense mat of alligatorweed was treated
with 6 Ib/A of silvex and a beetle population of one adult per 2-sq ft
of mat was introduced when regrowth was 2 to 5" high.  The beetles
showed a feeding preference for the young regrowth over the more mature
nontreated alligatorweed and maintained sufficient feeding pressure to
                                 90
eliminate the floating mat growth.
        Integrated control today has acquired a wider interpretation than
was proposed 15  years ago.  Broadly,  it refers to integration of all
crop protection procedures.  The acceptance of such an approach of
pest control is widely accepted by agriculturists  and environmentalists.
        Integrated control programs in general required a higher level
of scientific background when compared  to chemical control. At least
a minimum level of information is usually needed regarding the  following
points:  the general biology, distribution and behavior of the key pests;
an approximation of the pest population levels that  can be tolerated without
                                 375

-------
significant crop loss; a rough evaluation of the times and places of
occurrence,  and the significance of the major predators, parasites,
and pathogens present; information on the impact of the use of pesticides,
insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides, as well as other control
measures on natural enemies, and on natural and agroecosystems.
                  10.   Miscellaneous Methods
                          a. Seed Laws
       One of the methods by which weeds spread is through their in-
clusion with crop seeds.  As early as 1821,  Connecticut passed a law
prohibiting the sale of grass seed containing Canada thistle and other
weeds.  The  earliest vegetable seed laws were adopted by Florida in 1889.
                                                        91
By 1941  all 48 states had seed laws.  The federal seed act   requires
in part that 'the following information be provided on seed labels in
interstate commerce:  percentage of pure seed of the named crop,
percentage of other crop seeds, percentage of weed seeds,  and the
rate of their  occurrence.  Crop seeds cannot be  sold for seeding purposes
in most states if they contain noxious weeds in exceed of a specified
percent by weight of weed seeds,  generally two or three percent.
       The model state seed law, used as a guideline for legislation
by many states, provides a typical example of state regulations.
Noxious-weed seeds are separated into two classes:  prohibited (generally
annuals) and  restricted (seeds of perennial weeds).
       Seed laws  at state and federal levels have been important in
                                                                91
reducing the  spread of weed species and in improving seed quality.
                     b.  Seed Certification
       Seed certification is the system used to keep pedigree records
for crop varieties and to make available sources of genetically pure,
disease-free seeds and propagating material for general distribution.
Without such a system, seeds tend to become contaminated and mixed
and lose identity.  Certified seeds contain relatively fewer weed seeds.

                                376

-------
       Drill-box surveys of the quality of field crop seeds planted by
farmers has indicated that  seed suppliers have not kept pace wi th the
strides that have been made in developing better seed-cleaning rrachinery
and knowledge of seed processing.  Only about five percent of seeds were
certified and they were found to contain 1. 2 weed seeds per pound, in
comparison with 160 weed  seed per pound for non-certified seeds
purchased from dealers or taken from farmers  bins.  Although seed
certification programs have direct control over only a small percentage
of the small grain  that is planted, their beneficial effect on quality of
seeds planted by farmers will grow through continuing seed certification
                         92 7
and educational program.   '
         c.  Disease Control through Virus-free Stock
        There are at present no practical and economical treatments
to cure virus-infected plants in the fields.   Methods of control, therefore,
are generally directed toward preventing infection by  eliminating the
source of inoculum,  by preventing spread of virus, or by developing
varieties immune to the virus or immune to disease they cause.   The
production abd distribution of "virus-free" propagating material
has proved highly successful in controlling virus diseases in many
crops.   The term virus-free can be  defined as free from the known and
specified viruses for which tests have been conducted.
        The tactics of virus control depend upon integration of several
distinct activities:
        • The recognition and characterization of the  virus diseases in
           each crop
        • The development of reliable indexing methods to retrieve any
           existing healthy  stock, to  sort plants  that have been treated
           to eliminate virus,  and to  detect any symptomless carriers
                                 377

-------
       « The development of techniques to rid a few selected plants of
         virus and establish clones of virus-free foundation stocks
          where no healthy material is  found.

       • The enactment of measures such as  certification program to
         maintain the health of foundation stocks,  and to secure
          effective distribution of their progeny to  growers and
         nurserymen.

       In the United States certification programs are individual state
functions.  A certification program for  virus-free citrus stocks is
presently used in Florida.  Such programs tend to keep a control on the
                                                         18
known viruses of crops propagated from vegetative stocks.

             d.  Quarantine and Regulatory Controls

       In agriculture,  quarantine refers to the restraints or restrictions
placed upon the transportation  of animals, livestock,  poultry, plants,
fruits and vegetables, plant  and animal  products or other materials which
are suspected of being carriers of agricultural pests.  Such precautions

are necessary as many of the worst plant pests  came from other countries
and thrieved here because of abundant food and few natural enemies.
The tempo of international travel has greatly increased and with it the
danger of spreading pests has greatly increased.  Quarantine system is,
as such, a necessary element of overall national preventive pest control
           93
programs.

       Domestic quarantines between states,  combined with treatment

programs ,  have eliminated  several pests from  the United States.

For example Japanese beetle,  Popillia japonica Newman has  been under
continuous  regulation in the United States  since 1919.  Established

infestation still doesn't exist west of the Mississippi River, and  occurs
only in siolated areas in the southeast.  Control and quarantine programs

have confined the gypsy moth,  Prothetria dlspar (Linn. ) to a few north-
eastern states although there are some  100 million acres west of the
                                                  Q
Mississippi River known to be susceptible  to attack.
                              378

-------
       Publicly supported regulatory programs are an essential part
of the overall effort to protect crops and livestock from pests.  Various
methods are used in eradication, containment and suppression programs;
there include chemical, cultural and biological measures.  Greater
merit is indicated for large scale alternative control programs as
compared to region-wide chemical spraying.  Many of the alternative
techniques of pest control are employed on larger areas than individual
farms.  Programs of state and federal agencies in cooperation with
private agencies and farmers will be required in pest control.
                      e.  Pest Surveillance
        The detection  of pests and surveys of their distribution and
abundance are essential prerequisites to rational control programs.  The
first principle of pest detection and surveys as related to control is
that no control measures should be undertaken against a pest unless  it
is known that the pest is actually present.  In many  instances,  this
principle is  not followed.   Many farmers  often follow a strict schedule
without bothering to determine whether the pest is actually present.  This
is partly attributed to the lack of appreciation of the merits of pest
assessment.  The  second principle of pest detection is that no control
measures  should be undertaken unless it is known that the pest is
present  in sufficient numbers to cause economic loss.
       In 1971,  cotton insect scouting programs have been conducted
in ten states (Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia,  Mississippi,  Missouri,
North  Carolina,  South Carolina,  Texas and Louisiana).  A total of 628
scouts were trained.  They scouted 877,225 acres out of 10,421,000
acres under cultivation.  Scouting programs have been in operation for
nine years in Alabama.  Scouted cotton fields have averaged 200 more
pounds of lint per acre than fields not  scouted.  A scout who has received
special training by an extension service entomologist can keep growers
informed of  the following;
                               379

-------
       •  When the infestation count is great enough to warrant starting
          a control program
       •  When to expect hatchout of boll weevils or bollworms
       •  How long to continue the control  program into the fall
       Scouts give farmers weekly written insect reports and also send
infestation reports to county extension chairmen and to extension entomo-
logists.  Each week, reports are summarized and  a copy sent to  all
                                                              94
county extension chairmen and other agriculturists in the state.    Although
no data are available about the actual percent reduction in the pesticide
used, it is estimated that a considerable number of unnecessary pesticide
applications can be avoided without loss  in economic returns.  This
can only be effective if large areas are brought under  surveillance.
Sufficient understanding of pest ecology and biology exists so that such
programs can be initiated now.  Extension services and agricultural
universities can play an important role in  such activities.
                      f.  Genetic Manipulations
       The first attempt at control by the  application of  genetics to
decrease fitness involved the tsetse flies,  Glossina sp. Interspecific
crosses were made of Glossina swynnertoni  and the reproductively
but not sexually isolated  G.  morsitans. Viable but sterile offspring
were obtained from such crosses, which competed with normal individual
for survival in the environment.
       Many lethal genes exist in populations of insect species that have
been subjected to  genetic analyses.  Deleterious genes need not be lethal
nor act immediately for effective control.  Drastic reductions in insect
numbers can be obtained theoretically by constant low-level mortality
factors  superimposed on populations already exposed  to the stress of
                               380

-------
adverse environmental conditions as, for example,  low temperature
during hibernation.   Three requirements are essential to the success of
control measures utilizing the release of strains carrying unfavorable
genetic characters:  the factors must not prevent rearing under laboratory
conditions; they must not interfere with mating ability; and they should
act at  particular times, such as during hibernation or immature stages.
It has been postulated on theoretical grounds that the eradication of
the boll weevil, Anthonomus  grandis, could be achieved in a few years
if males carrying two lethal genes were  repeatedly released into field
populations.   It should be considered that such additional release of
pests could temporarily increase the loss of the crop until lethal genes
are inherited and  come into effect.
        Although genetic methods seem to offer promising leads, considerable
work is needed before such techniques can be incorporated at a practical
level.
                  g.  Development of Safer Pesticides
        It is widely accepted that although alternative technology exists,
conventional chemicals will remain  the chief means of insect pest
control for the foreseeable future.  '  'An explanation for this lag in the
use of alternative methods merits explanation.  There has been a growing
concern over certain known and potential threats to the quality of our
environment because of the use  of the broad-spectrum pesticides.   This
concern however, has not been fully translated into increased commitment
of resources  toward search,  development or large-scale testing of alter-
native  methods.  The United  States  must be prepared to support substantially
larger expenditures from  its  resources if there is  to be great progress
in correcting or alleviating many pesticidal pollution  problems, utilizing
and boradening our  knowledge of alternative  pest control technology  and
development of safer pesticides. The time factor is also involved
as regards ecological aspects,  alternatives need to be developed soundly
                                381

-------
after elaborate trials. It requires several years to perfect these techniques
prior to use at a national or regional level.   Such practices in a strict
sense,  must not be considered as alternatives to total pesticide usage,
but rather,  means for the more effective use of pesticides.
        Most of the chemicals widely used for agricultural pest control
have been selected on the basis of optimum  effectiveness against the
pest and for maximum persistence.  The original DDT patent of 1939
covered a number of insecticidal  analogs.    These included methoxychlor,
ethoxychlor and methychlor.  All of these compounds are persistent
insecticides effective against a wide spectrum of insect pests and they are
relatively inexpensive.  However, DDT is the most stable and has  had
extensive use, whereas  methoxychlor has been used on a modest scale,
 and ethoxychlor and methylchlor not at all.   These DDT-related compounds
 are rapidly degraded by the multifunction oxidases of higher animals
 and converted to  water  soluble compounds.   DDT is not.  Similarly, the
 related compounds are  less toxic to fish. Ethoxychlor, methychlor and
 other biodegradable  derivaties of DDT merit further investigation as
 replacements for DDT and other  persistent and non-biodegradable
 chlorinated hydrocarbons.  Similar safer analogs (fenthion,  ronnel,
 dicapthon) exist for  methyl parathion, the most commonly used organic
 phosphate insecticide. 'Attention is being given  to the effect on wildlife
 of pesticides. Further  consideration should also be  directed toward
 the  effect of these pesticides on the natural enemies  of pests.
        A questionnaire  survey was conducted by the  1970 National
 Agricultural  Chemicals Association.^7This  is a trade organization
 representing most of the U. S. pesticide industry.  When asked to
 reply in their words as  to the most important obstacles to the develop-
 ment of safer, less  persistent and  more selective pesticides,  the  following
 reasons were listed  (the number  in parehtheses indicating the number of
                                 382

-------
times each item -was cited):  high cost of research and development in
terms of money and time (11); lack of knowledge of basic plant and animal
biochemistry (4); competition from existing,  non-selective, relatively
inexpensive pesticides (4); lack of grower interest, high cost of selective
products that grower is unwilling to pay (3); cumbersome government
registration procedures,  especially slowness and procrastination in
handling of petitions (1),  unscientific  approach (1), and  stringent
requirements (1); fear of consumer complaints and litigation (1); lack
of interest, support,  and experience on part of agricultural workers (1).
        The next question was also unstructured and asked what steps
might be taken  to remove the restraints described under the preceding
question.  The  following suggestions were made (the numbers in
parentheses again indicating the number of times each item was cited):
design better and more efficient screening, testing,  and development
methods to reduce development time  and cost (4); modify registration
requirements to reduce development time and cost, speed up processing
of registration  applications (3); create a less emotional, more objective
public attitude  toward pesticides (3);  provide  for a patent life of pesticides
more in line with their commercial usefulness, recognizing the long
time required for  research, development,  and  initial registration
(2);  provide economic incentives to manufacturers (2); increase basic
physiological, biochemical,  and ecological know-how (1); educate
agricultural workers,  and regulatory  agencies  that the purpose of pest
control is  not destruction of pests, but protection of crop yield (1);
define levels of pesticide persistence  that are necessary and safe (1);
limit manufacturers' liability to proven fault in his product (1); cease
                                                    97
diverting manpower to the defense establishment (1).
                                383

-------
       If chemicals are to be used in a harmonious manner in the agro-
ecosystem then we must have materials that are inherently selective
or we must learn how to use them so that their effects are selective.
All pesticides have some selectivity but the range in degree of selectivity
is very great.  Much effort has been expended in seeking materials
with relatively high toxicity to invertebrates and low toxicity to mammals.
We must also seek differential toxicity within the arthropods (insects).
We do not need the ultimate in specificity that would permit us to prescribe
a specific chemical for each pest species.   However, we do need materials
that are specific for groups of pests such as aphids,  locusts,  lepidopterous
larvae, weevils, and so forth.  As shown above,  there are some indications
that we can have some materials with such specificity and still have
them economically feasible from the viewpoint of the  chemical industry.
                                                                  98
Also, there are indications that safer chemicals can be synthesized.
Somehow,  the imperative need to replace older and obsolescent agents
with substances having more desirable properties has not been forcefully
transmitted to the agricultural and pest control industries.  At least
development and widespread use of selective pesticides has not been
encouraged.  There is an increasingly regrettable tendency to develop
and market nonselective insecticides which are  more and more toxic
to higher animals and man, as  well as beneficial and harmful insects.
        There is always likely to be a need for some chemical pesticides
if we are to provide for the needs of the human society.   Risks of their
usage must be minimized and supplemented with other pest control
methods.
        Through  greater cooperation between public and private sectors
and by legislation of  adequate laws, excessive reliance on broad spectrum
pesticides can be reduced.  Creation of a situation where voluntary
information and  resource exchange exists can solve the problem of
                                384

-------
erratic and short term pesticidal control.   Only in such an atmosphere
can alternative  methods be further developed and utilized.  As with other
pollution problems, solution of pesticidal dilemna will require a carefully
chartered course, consolidated effort and  a national commitment.  The
magnitude of this problem should motivate  the country toward an intensive
action program at the grass-roots  level.
                                    385

-------
                         11.  Conclusions




       Cultural methods of control (sanitation,  tillage,  dates of planting



etc. )  along with the use of resistant crop varieties is the farmers first



line of defense against pests.  These  practices considerably reduce but



do not eliminate the need for other pest control methods.  For certain



pests, such as many plant viruses and nematodes, chemical treatment



is neither feasable nor economical.  In such cases, physical, mechanical



and regulatory (quarantine and certification) methods are utilized to



reduce or prevent pest populations.




       Many major economic pests in the United States  have been



introduced from other countries without their natural parasites and



predators.  Importation and release of these natural enemies have




proved to be effective in suppression of pests in some cases.  Broad



spectrum pesticide applications have the adverse  effect of destroying



the natural enemies of insects thus eliminating a natural check on



pest populations in agricultural  ecosystems.




       Efforts toward the development of biological control agents



(virus, bacteria, protoza, fungi, nematodes attacking insects) may



result in safer and specific pest control practices.  Similarly numerous



insect hormones (e. g.  juvenile and ecdysone) have the potential of being



utilized  as selective insecticides.




       Many insect attractants have been characterized and developed to



lure insects into traps containing pesticides,  pathogens  and



chemosterilants.  Chemical and electromagnetic radiation (light  traps)



attractants also provide for  early  detection and location of insect-



infestation.   This is an important  component in integrated and pest



surveillance programs.
                                  386

-------
       Eradication of selected insect species has been achieved by
releasing sterile males to compete with the fertile ones in the natural
environment.  This method of pest eradication is successful only if the
natural insect population is low.  In such cases, the sterile males
"overwhelm" the fertile males.  Expanded  use of this technique has been
restricted by high  cost and logistic factors. Sterilization of the natural
pest population by  chemosterilants could reduce such time and  cost
factors.
       Integrated  control is a pest population management system that
employs several suitable  techniques  to reduce pest populations and
maintain them at levels below those causing economic injury.  This
method provides the best  solution to a pest  problem because  all possible
controls are first  evaluated.  This approach requires ecological
information,  pest  threshold and economic injury levels.
       To date, public and private efforts in pest control have been
directed toward development of pesticides with little effort being
directed to alternatives.   There is little inducement for industry to
develop alternative methods until large-scale pilot studies  have been
proven successful.  Pesticides will continue to be used in the foreseeable
future. Alternative methods,  if further developed and applied,  can
reduce excessive dependence on broad spectrum pesticides.
                      12.  Recommendations
1.  A set of national priorities must be established by the U. S.
Department of Agriculture for developing alternative  methods of pest
control beginning with those situations which utilize the largest
quantities of broad spectrum,  persistant pesticides.
2.  U.  S.  Department of Agriculture, through its Extension Service,
should expand its role of judicious use of pesticides.  A complementary
activity and one of  the methods which could considerably reduce the
amount of pesticides applied is increased crop surveillance.
                                   387

-------
 3.   The Agricultural Research Service of U.  S.  Department of
 Agriculture should receive greater support for large scale field
 testing to determine the effectiveness of promising alternative methods
 of pest control.  Successful programs can then be adopted regionally
 to eradicate, reduce or maintain pest populations below economic
 injury thresholds.  Pest control at the farmer level should be
 reevaluated in  order that part of the pest management programs can be
 conducted on the entire  pest infestation region.

4.  Fundamental research should be supported by U.  S.  Department of
Agriculture and the Environmental  Protection Agency which elucidates
basic life processes.  Such understanding is to provide the basis for
improved pest management with  minimum disruption of the ecosystem.
5.  Educational  training at the farm level in pest surveillance, integrated
control,  population dynamics and ecological aspect must be expanded.
6.  Federal and state governments  must drastically increase their
financial support if alternative methods are to emerge as effective
methods  of control and  management.
7.  Protocols for  safety tests of  microbial.pesticides and hormones
should be defined  by the Food and Drug Adminstration so that researcher
as well as prospective producers will be guided by common requirements
8.  The U. S. Department of Agriculture in conjunction with other
governmental agencies  and scientific organiaations should seek greater
international cooperation in  minimizing pest migration and in developing
biological control and alternatives to pesticides.
                                 388

-------
                         13.  References

 1.  Doutt, R. L. , Biological Control,  Pest Control,  Biological,
    Physical and Selected Chemical Methods,  New York,  Academic
    Press, 3-30, 1967.

 2.  Rudd, R. L. , Pesticides and the Living Landscape,  Madison,
    University  of Wisconsin Press, 320,  1966.              ,

 3.  DeBach, Paul,  The Scope of Biological Control,  Biological Control
    of Insect Pests  and Weeds,  New York,  Reinhold  Publishing,
    3-18, 1964.

 4.  Knipling, E. F.  , Use of Organisms to Control Insect Pests, J.
    Eviron.  Quality,  1_, 34-40,  1971.

 5.  Rabb, R. L. and Guthrie, F. E. ,  Concepts of Pest Management,
    Raleigh, North Carolina State University,  242,  1970.

 6.  Anonymous,  Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control,
    Washington,  D. C. , National Academy of Sciences, _!_, 205,
     1968.

 7.  Anonymous,  Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control,
    Washington,  D.C. , National Academy of Sciences, 2_, 205,
     1968.

 8.  Anonymous,  Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control,
    Washington,  D. C. , National Academy of Sciences, _3, 508,
    1969-

 9.  Anonymous,  Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control,
    Washington,  D. C. , National Academy of Sciences, _4,  172,
     1968.

10.  Johnson, H. W.  , Development of Crop Resistance to  Diseases and
    Nematodes, J.  Environ., Qual. J_,  23-7,  1972.

11.  Arnold,  J. M. ,  Josephson,  L. M. , Overton, J. R. and Bennett,
    S. E. , Cultural  Control of the Southwestern Corn Borer,  Tennessee
    Agri. Exp.  Stat. ,  Bull.  466,  12,  1970.
                                  389

-------
                        References (continued)

12.  Newsom,  L. D. and Brazzel, J. R. ,  Pests and Their Control,
     Advances  in Production and Utilization of Quality Cotton, Ames,
     Iowa State University Press, 367-405,  1968.

13.  Presley, J. T. and Bird, L. S. , Diseases and Their Control in
     Cotton,  Principles and Practices, Ames, Iowa State University
     Press, 347-64,  1968.

14.  Holstun,  J. T. , Jr.  and Wooten, O. B., Weeds and Their Control
     in Cotton, Principles and Practices,  Ames,  Iowa State University
     Press,  151-81,  1968.

15.  Hartsock, J. G. ,  Deay,  H.D.,  Barrett, J. R. , Jr.,  Practical
     Application of Insect Attraction in the Use of Light Traps, Bull.
     Entomol.  Soc.  Amer. , 12,  375-77, 1966.

16.  Hoffman,  C. H. and Henderson, L.S., The Fight  Against Insects,
     U.S. Department of Agriculture Yearbook, 26-38,  1966.

17.  Osmun,  J. V. , Physical Methods  of Pest Control, J. Environ.
     Qual. J_, 40-4,  1972.

18.  Carter,  Walter, The Control of Viruses and  Virus Diseases of
     Plants in Insects in Relation to Plant Diseases, New York,  John
     Wiley and Sons,  636-92,  1962.

19.  Hoffman,  J. D. ,  Lawson, F. R. , and.Peace,  B. ,  Attraction of
     Blacklight Traps Baited with Virgin Female Tobacco Horn-worm
     Moths, J. Econ.  Entomol.   59. 809-11, 1966.

20.  Painter,  R. H. ,  Insect Resistance in  Crop Plants, Lawrence,
     University of Kansas Press, 520,  1968.

21.  Walker, J. C. ,  Progress and Problems in Controlling Plant
     Diseases by Host Resistance,  Plant Pathology Problems and
     Progress, Madison,  University of Wisconsin  Press,
     32-41, 1959.

22.  Stoner, A. K. , Breeding for Insect Resistance in Vegetables,
     Hort-Science 5,  76-9, 1970.

23.  Stevenson,  F. J. and Jones, H. A. , Some Sources of Resistance
     in Crops,  U.S. Department of Agric. Yearbook,   192-216,
     1953.
                                  390

-------
                         References (continued)

24.  Maxwell,  F. G. , Jenkins, J. N. ,  Parrott, W. L. and Buford, W. T. ,
     Factors Contributing to Resistance and Susceptibility of Cotton
     and Other Hosts to the Boll Weevil,  Anthonomous grandis,
     Entomol.  Exp. and Appl.  12,  801-10, 1969.

25.  Sprague, G. F. and Dahms, R. G. , Development of Crop
     Resistance to Insects,  J.  Environ. Quality J_, 28-33, 1972.

26.  Miller,  P. R.  and  McGrath, H. ,  Plant Diseases and Nematodes,
     U.S. Department of Agric.  Yearbook, 39-45, 1966.

27.  Shay, J.R. ,  Breeding  Vegetable  and Fruit Crops for Resistance
     to  Disease,  Symb.  on Biological  and Chemical Control  of Plant
     and Animal Pest Control, Amer. Assoc.  Adv.  Sci. Pub.  61,
     229-44,  I960.

28.  Grehold, H. D. and Schreiner, E. J.  , Breeding Pest Resistant
     Trees,  Proceedings of N.A.T.O. andN.S.F., Advanced Study
     Institute on Genetic  Improvement for Disease and Insect
     Resistance of Forest Trees, New York,  Pergamon Press,
     505, 1964.

29.  Stern,  V. M. , Smith, R.F., Van Den Bosch, R. ,  Hagen, K. S. ,
     The Integration of Chemical and Biological  Control of the Spotted
     Alfalfa Aphid,  The Integrated Control Concept, Hilgardia, 29,
     81-101,  1959.

30.  Steinhaus, E. A. ,  Applied Insect Pathology  and Biological
     Control, Principles of Insect Pathology,  New York, McGraw-
     Hill Pub.  Co.,  697-704,  1949.

31.  Heimpel,  A.M., Insect Pathology, Present and Future, U.S.
     Department of Agric., A. R. S. Series 12580,  33-110, 70-75,  1966.

32.  Greer,  F. ,  Ignoffo, C. M. and Anderson, R. F.,  The First Viral
     Pesticides; Case History,  Chem.  Tech., 342-7, June  1971.

33.  Ignoffo, C.M. .Specificity of Insect Viruses, Bull.  Entomol.  Soc.
     Amer.  14, 265-76,  1968.

34.  Ignoffo, C. M. ,  Microbial Insecticides, No-Yes,  Now-When,  Proc.
     Tall Timber  Conf.  on Ecol. Animal Control by Habit at Manage-
     ment 2,  41-57, 1970.
                                391

-------
                           References  (continued)

35.  Swingle,  H.S. , Control of Pond Weeds by the Use of Herbivorous
     Fishes, Proc.  South Weed Conf.,  1Q,   11-17, 1957.

36.  Holm,  L.G.,Weldon, L.W.,  Blackburn, R. D. , Aquatic Weeds,
     Science,  166, 699-709,  1969.

37.  Muma, M. H. ,  and Clancy,  D.W. ,  Parastism of Purple Scale in
     Florida Citrus Groves, Florida Ent. ,  44, 159-65, 1961.

38.  Muma, M. H. ,  Natural Control of Florida Red Scale  on Citrus in
     Florida by Predators and Parasites, J. Econ. Entomol.  52,
      577-86.,  1959.

39-  Clancy, D.W. , Shelhime,  A. G. , and Muma,  M. H. ,  Establishment
     of Aphytis holoxanthus as a Parasite of Florida Red Scale in
     Florida,  J.  Econ.  Entomol. _56, 603-5, 1963.

40.  Selhime,  A. G. , Muma, M. H. ,  Simanton, W. A. , and McCoy,
     C. W. , Control of Florida Red Scale in Florida with the Parasite
     Aphytis holoxanthus, J. Econ. Entomol.  62,  954-5,  1969.

41.  Lewis, W. J. and  Brazzel, J.R.,  A Three-Year Study of Parasites
     of the Bollworm and the Tobacco Budworm  in Mississippi, J.
     Econ. Entomol, 61, 673-6, 1968,

42.  Chamberlin, F. S.  and Tenhet, J. N. ,  Cardiochiles nigriceps Vier,
     An Important Parasite of the Tobacco  Budworm, Heliothis
     virescens Fab. ,  J. Agri.  Res.  _33, 2777,  1926.

43.  Fox, P.M.,  Bass, B.C.,  and Thurston,  R. - Laboratory Studies
     on the Rearing of  Aphidius smithi (hymenoptera:  Braconidae),
     Ann. Entomol. 'Soc. Amer. 60,  1083-7,  1967.

44.  Anonymous, Wasps Thrown Into Fight  Against Gypsy Moth,
     Huntsville Times,  62,  12»  1971.

45.  Nash, R. F. and Fox,  R. C. , Field Control  of the Nantucket Pine
     Tip Moth  by the Nematode,  DD-136, J. Econ. Entomol.  62,
     660-3, 1969.

46.  Allen,  G.  E. ,  Gregory, B.G.  and Brazzel,  J. R. , Integration of
     the Heliothis Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus into a Biological
     Control Program  on Cotton,  J.  Econ.  Entomol.  59,
     1333-6, 1966.
                               392

-------
                           References (continued)

47.  Garner,  G. R. and Canerday, T.D. ,  Entomophthora Species as
     a Factor in the Regulation of the Two-spotted Spider Mite on
     Cotton,  J. Econ. Entomol. 68,  638-40,  1970.

48.  Anonymous, Snails Weed Waterways, Agri. Res  , 11,
      8-9,  1962.                            6       '  —

49.  Seaman, D. E. and Porterfield, W.A. , Control of Aquatic Weeds
     by the Snail,  Marisa cornuarietis, Weeds,  12,  87-92,  1961.

50.  Zeiger, C. F. ,  Biological Control of Alligatorweed with
     Agasicles sp.  in Florida,  Proc. South Weed Conf. 20,
     299-303, 1967.

51.  Avault,  J.W. , Biological Weed Control with Herbicorous Fish. ,
     Proc. South Weed Conf.  18, 590-1, 1965.

52.  Sills, J. B. , A Review of Herbivorous Fish for  Weed Control,
     Proc. Fish Culture _32_, 158-61, 1970.

53.  Anonymous, Research on Controlling Insects without Conventional
     Insecticides, ARS 22-85,  23, 1963.

54.  Knipling, E. F. ,  Possibilities of Insect Control or Eradication
     through the Use  of Sexually Sterile Males, J. Econ. Entomol.  48,
     459-62,  1955.

55.  Knipling, E. F. ,  Potentialities and Progress  in the Development
     of Chemosterilants for Insect Control, J. Econ. Entomol. 55,
     782,  1962.

56.  Baumhover, A. H. , Graham, A. J. , Bitter, B. A.  , Hopkins, D. E. ,
     New,  W.D.,  Dudley, F.H. and Bushland,  R. C.,  Screw-Worm
     Control Through Release of Sterilized Flies,  J. Econ.  Entomol.
     •48,  462-66,  1955.

57.  Anonymous, Sterile-male  Technique  for Eradication or Control
     of Harmful Insects,  Proc. Int.  Atom. Ener.  Agency,  3-15,
     1968.

58.  Bushland, R. C. , Insect  Eradication by Means of  Sterilized Males,
     Handbook on Biological Control of Plant Pests,  Brooklyn Botanic
     Garden,  16,  88-94,  I960.
                               393

-------
                         References (continued)

59-  Bushland, R. C. and Hopkins, D. E. , Sterilization of Screw-Worm
     Flies with X-Rays and Gamma-Rays,  J.  Econ. Entomol.  46,
     648-56, 1953.

60.  Snow, J.W., Burton, R. L.,  Sparks, A.M. and Cantelo,  W. W. ,
     Attempted Eradication of the Corn Earworm from St. Croix, U.S. ,
     Virgin Islands, Production Res.  Rept. U.S. Department of
     Agric. 125, 12, 1971.

61.  Lindquist,  D. A. , Gorzycki,  L. J. , Mayer, M.S., Scales,  A. L.
     and Davich, T. B. ,  Laboratory Studies in Sterilization of the
     Boll Weevil with Apholate, J. Econ.  Entomol. jT7,  745-5,  1964.

62.  Davich, T. B. ,  Keller,  J. C. , Mitchell, E. B. ,  Huddleston, P.,
     Hill,  R. , Lindquist, D.A. , McKibben, G. , and Cross,  W. H. ,
     Preliminary Field Experiments with Sterile Males for Eradication
     of the Boll  Weevil,  J.  Econ. Entomol. 58, 127-31,  1965.

63.  Hedin, P. A. , Cody, C. P. and Thompson, A. C. ,  Antifertility
     Effect of the Chemosterilant Apholate on the Male Boll Weevil,
     J. Econ. Entomol.  57,  270-2,  1964.

64.  Hedin, P. A. , Wiygul, G. , Vickers,  D. A. , Bartlett,  A. C.  and
     Mitlin, N. ,  Sterility Induced by TEPA in the Boll Weevil,
     Effective Dose  and  Permanency, Gonadal Changes, and Biological
     Turnover of Labeled Compound,  J.  Econ. Entomol. 60, 209-
     14,  1967.

65.  LaBrecque, G. C. ,  Studies with Three Alkylating  Agents as House
     Fly Sterilants,  J.  Econ.  Entomol., 54, 684-9,  1961.

66.  Gouck, H. K. and LaBrecque, G. C. , Chemicals Affecting Fertility
     in Adult House  Flies, J.  Econ.  Entomol.  57, 663-4,  1964.

67.  LaBrecque, G. C. ,  Smith, C. N. ,  and Meifert,  D.W., A Field
     Experiment in the Control of House Flies with Chemosterilant
     Baits, J. Econ. Entomol. 55,  449-51, 1962.

68.  LaBrecque, G. C. ,  Meifert,  D.W. , and Fye, R. L. , A Field
     Study on the Control of  HouseFlies with Chemosterilant Techniques,
     J. Econ.  Entomol.  56,  150-52,  1963.
                               394

-------
                         References (continued)

69-  Gouck, H. K. , Meifert, D.W. and Gahman, J. B. , A Field
     Experiment with Apholate as a Chemosterilant for the Control of
     House Flies, J. Econ. Entomol.  56,  445-6,  1963.

70.  Young, J. R. and Snow, J.W. ,  TEPA as a Chemosterilant for the
     Earworm,  Armyworm, and Granulate Cutworm, J.  Econ. Entomol.
     6£,  1427-30, 1967.

71.  Young, J. R. and Cox, H. C. ,  Evaluation of Apholate and TEPA as
     Chemosterilants for the Fall Armyworm, J.  Econ.  Entomol.  58,
     883-8, 1965.

72.  Jacobson,  M.  and Beroza, M. ,  Chemical Insect Attractants,
     Science 140, 1367-73, 1963.

73.  Beroza,  M. and Green, N. ,  New Approaches to Pest Control and
     Eradication, Amer. Chem.  Soc. ,  Adv. Chem. Ser.  41,  11-30,
     1963.

74.  Jacobson,  Martin,  Insect Sex Attractants, New York,  Interscience
     Pub., Pg.  33-8, Pg. 46-8,  33-8,  46-8, 112-21, 1965.

75.  Green, N. , Beroza, M.  and Hall, S. A. ,  Recent Developments in
     Chemical Attractants for Insects,  Adv. Pest Control Res. 3_,
     129-79,  I960.

76.  Jacobson,  M.  and Crosby, D. G. ,  Naturally Occurring Insecticides,
     New York,  Marcel Dekker Pub. Co.,  585, 1971.

77.  Steiner,  L. F. ,  Rolwer,  G. G. , Ayers, E. L,. and Christenson,
     L D   Tne Role of Attractants in the  Recent  Mediterranean Fruit
     Fly Eradication Program in Florida,  J. Econ. Entomol.  54,
     30-35, 1961.

78.  Tumlinson, J. H. , Hardee, D. D. , Gueldner, R. C. ,  Thompson,
     A. C.,  Hedin,  P. A.  and Minyard,  J. P. , Sex Phermones Produced
     by Male Boll Weevil, Isolation,  Identification and Synthesis,
     Science 166, 1010-12, 1969.

79.  Tumilson,  J. H. , Hardee, D. D., Minyard, J. P. , Thompson,
     A. C.,  Cast, R. T. ,  and Hedin, P. A. , Boll Weevil Sex Attractant,
     Isolation Studies,  J. Econ.  Entomol. _61_, 470-4, 1968.
                              395

-------
                          References (continued)

80.  McKibben, G. H. ,  Hardee, D. D. ,  Davich, T. B. ,  Gueldner, R. C.
     and Hedin, P. A. ,  Slow Release Formulations of Grandlure, the
     Synthetic Pheromone of the Weevil,  J.  Econ. Entomol.  64,
     317-19, 1971.

81.  Vite1, J. P. ,  Pest Management Systems Using Synthetic Pheromones,
     Contrib.  Boyee Thompson Inst.  24,  343-50,  1970.

82.  Williams, C. M. ,  Third Generation  Pesticides,  Scientific Amer.
     217, 13-17, 1967.

83.  Bowers,  W. S. ,  Conference on Insect-Plant Interactions,  Bio-
     Science J_8, 791-8, 1968.

84.  Slama,  K. , Conference on Insect-Plant Interactions,  BioScience
     18,  791-98,  1968.

85.  Beirne, B. P. ,  Pest Management, Cleveland, CRC Press,
     123, 1967.

86.  Smith, R. F. ,  Integration of Biological  and Chemical Control,
     Bull.  Entomol. Soc. Amer. 8_, 188-89,  1962.

87.  Lindstrom, L.,  Target: Boll Weevil, The Furrow, 20-1,
     September-October  1971.

88.  Lawson,  F. R.,  Rabb, R. L,. ,  Guthrie,  F. E. and Bowery, T. G. ,
     Studies of an  Integrated Control System for  Hornworms  on
     Tobacco,  J. Econ. Entomol. 54, 93-7,  1961.

89.  Wicht, M. C.  and Rodriguez, J. G. ,  Integrated Control of Muscid
     Flies  in Poultry Houses Using Predator Mites, Selected
     Pesticides and Microbial Agents, J. Med.  Entomol. 1_, 687-
     92,  1970.

90.  Weldon, L. W. and Burden, W.C. ,  Integrated Biological and
     Chemical  Control  of Aquatic Weeds, Proc.  South Weed Conf. 23,
     282,  1970.

91.  Rollin, S. F. and Johnson,  F. A. , Our Laws  Pertaining to Seeds,
     U.S. Department of Agric. Yearbook, 482-92, 1961.
                             396

-------
                          References (continued)

92.  Parsons, F. G. , Garrison,  C. S. and Bee son, K. E. ,  Seed
     Certification in United States, U.S.  Department of Agric.  Yearbook,
     394-401, 1961.

93.  Rainwater, H.I. and Smith, C. A. ,  Quarantines - First Line of
     Defense, U.S. Department  of Agric. Yearbook, 216-14, 1966.

94.  Copeland, K. , Cotton Scouting:  Program for Profit,  Intern.
     Harvester Farm,  10-11,  Spring, 1970.

95.  Anonymous,  Restoring the Quality of Our Environment,  Washington,
     D.C.,  President's Science  Advi. Comm. ,  230-91, 1965.

96.  Metcalf, R. L. ,  Agricultural Chemicals in Relation to Environ-
     mental Quality,  J. Environ. Qual.  l_, 10-14, 1972.

97.  Rumker, R.  von,  Quest,  H. R. and Upholt,  W. M. , The Search
     for Safer, More Selective and Less  Persistent Pesticides,
     BioScience 2_0, 1004-7, 1970.

98.  Holan, G. , Rational Design of Degradable  Insecticides,  Nature,
     272,  644-47,  1971.
                              397

-------
APPENDIX
398

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    SCOTLAND COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs.Stanley Svrlin  o, 1953
       The defendant,  Stanley Svrlingo, a resident of the State of Florida,
was charged with engaging in the custom application of pesticides within
Scotland County, North Carolina without a license issued by the Com-
missioner of Agriculture as required by North Carolina General Statutes,
Chapter  106, Article 4B,  Section 65. 14.  The term,  "custom application
of pesticides"  is defined in the law to mean any application of pesticides
by aircraft.
       The defei.dant was the  operator of a Steerman aircraft.  He was
warned by the  enforcement officer that he  could not engage in the custom
application of pesticides without a license.  The following day the enforce-
ment officer -who had warned the defendant personally observed that the
aircraft  operated by the defendant was  dusting a cotton field.

       Evidence collected by the State  of North Carolina included the
eye witness testimony  of the enforcement officer, farmers who had con-
tracted for service by  the  defendant and cancelled checks of farmers  who
paid earlier for dusting services by the defendant.
                             Conclusions

        A warrant was issued for the arrest of the defendant.  Bond in
the amount of $25 was set and posted.  At the time of the trial, the
defendant did not appear. The defendant was observed in North Carolina
the following year  but the Scotland County solicitor  refused to reopen the
case.
                                399

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                      MARTIN COUNTY COURT

         State of North Carolina vs. Walter Ray Griffin, 1956
       The defendant,  Walter Ray Griffin of RFD Greensboro,  North
Carolina, was charged with engaging in the  custom application of pesticides
without a license issxied by the Commissioner of Agriculture.  The
defendant was  charged with violating Chapter 106, Article 4B,  Section 65. 14
of the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina.

       Private individuals advised enforcement authorities that an
advance  agent (spotter) was  contacting farmers  in Martin County to
arrange  business  contracts for the aerial application of pesticides by
the defendant.

       Evidence was obtained by subpoena of the advance agent and sev-
eral farmers. The records of several farmers were obtained •which
indicated the number of acres sprayed by the defendant using a J-3 Cub
aircraft  and the amount of dollars paid to the defendant.
                             Conclusions

        The defendant entered a plea of guilty and was convicted.  The
sentence required the defendant to pay a fine of $100 plus the court cost.
                                   400

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs. Delmar Owens,  1957
       The defendant,  Delmar Owens of Washington City, North Carolina
was  charged with violation of Chapter 106, Article 4B, Section 65. 14 of
the North Carolina General Statutes by operating a J-3 Cub aircraft in
Washington County and engaging in the custom application of pesticides
without a license  from the Commissioner of Agriculture.

       The evidence obtained by the enforcement officials included the
bills sent by the defendant to several farmers, their cancelled checks
and  the testimony of several farmers.  The  defendant was hired by the
farmers to apply pesticides to tobacco and soybean crops.
                              Conclusions

        The defendant entered a plea of Guilty.  The Clerk of the Court
 permitted the defendant to satisfy the misdeamor by payment of the court
 cost only.
                                 401

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                   ROCKINGHAM COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs. Jack Reynolds,  1958
       The defendant, Jack Reynolds,  a native of Candor, North
Carolina, was  charged with violation of Chapter 106, Article 4B,
Section 65. 14 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.  Specifically,
he engaged in the custom application of pesticide in Rockingham County
by operating a Steerman aircraft in the aerial application of pesticides
without the license required by the cited statute.

       The defendant was warned of the  requirement for a license by
enforcement officials several times prior to the indictment.  Farmers in
the area who had engaged the defendant were subpoenaed by the State.
The records of the farmers and their  cancelled checks  showing payment
to the defendant were offered in evidence.
                             Conclusions

       The defendant pleaded Not Guilty.  He was convicted of violating
the cited statute.  The  sentence was a fine of $100 plus the court cost.
                               402

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    BEAUFORT COUNTY COURT

            State  of North Carolina vs. Tom Stancill, 1965
       The State of North Carolina indicted Tom Stancill for violation
of Chapter 106, Article 4B, Section 65. 14 of the General Statutes of
North Carolina.  The defendant, Mr. Stancill,  was charged with en-
gaging in the aerial application of  pesticides in Beaufort County,
specifically operating a Piper-Pawnee PA18 aircraft.

       The defendant was a chronic violator who was warned by en-
forcement officials numerous times. Mr. Stancill operates a  business
known as Tom Stancill Flying Service.

       Several eye witnesses saw him spraying.  On indictment he
posted a $200 bond.  Evidence included the bills  of services rendered
from several farmers,  photostats of cancelled checks of farmers who
paid for  the services.  The defendant was subsequently involved in an
aerial accident during an application flight.
                             Conclusions

        The defendant entered a plea of Guilty with the Clerk of the
Court and exercised his  right to a waiver of appearance for a misdeamor.
The Clerk of the Court accepted settlement of $15 fine plus court cost.
                                403

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    BEAUFORT COUNTY COURT

            State of North Carolina vs.  Merrill Mayo,  1969
       The defendant,  Merrill Mayo, was  charged with engaging in the
custom application of pesticides without a license as required by
Chapter  106, Article 4B, Section 65. 14 of  the General Statutes of
North Carolina.  Specifically, the defendant as the aircraft owner
failed to obtain a license.

       The aircraft was found by investigators in Newburn,  North
Carolina as being without a proper license.  Both the defendant and
the pilot, Richard Nanney,  were informed  by the investigators of the
law requiring a license.  The following day the investigators  found the
aircraft  on a dirt strip in the farming area.  A farmer  informed the
investigator that Mayo's aircraft had sprayed his fields  that morning.
Again the pilot was instructed.   He subsequently engaged in application
operations witnessed by the investigator.
                             Conclusions

       The defendant entered a plea of Not Guilty.  The eyewitness
testimony of the investigator resulted in a conviction.  The sentence was
a $100 fine plus the court cost.
                                 404

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    BEAUFORT COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs. Richard Nanney,  1969
       The defendant, Richard Nanney, was  charged under Chapter 106,
Article 4B, Section 65. 14 of the North Carolina General Statutes of
operating an aircraft engaged in the custom application of pesticides
without a license.

       The circumstances and testimony in this case are recorded
in the earlier case entitled:  State of North Carolina versus Merrill
Mayo,  1969.
                             Conclusions

       This  case was tried subsequent to the case of Merrill Mayo.
The defendant pleaded Guilty.   The conviction carried a sentence of
a $50 fine plus the  court cost.
                                405

-------
                             BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    BEAUFORT COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs. Rodney Godley, 1969
       The defendant, Rodney Godley,  a native of Beaufort,  North
Carolina was charged under Chapter 106, Article 4B, Section 65. 14
of engaging as a contractor for the custom application of pesticides
without a license.

       A farmer was prepared to testify that Rodney Godley had con-
tracted for  spraying his crops. He had engaged Godley's firm and sub'
sequently witnessed the actual spraying.  At the time of arrest, the
defendant posted a $200 bond.
                             Conclusions

       The defendant could not be found at the time of trial.  The State
of North Carolina subsequently elected to nol pros the case.
                                   406

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    BEAUFORT COUNTY COURT

      State of North Carolina vs. Thomas E. Stancil,  Jr.,  1969
       The defendant,  Thomas E. Stancil,  Jr. ,  of Beaufort County,
doing business as Stancil Flying Service was charged with violation of
Chapter  106,  Article 4B, Section 65. 14 of the North Carolina General
Statutes.

       Specifically,  Mr. Stancil was charged with operating a Cal-Air
aircraft  in the aerial application of pesticides without a license.  The
evidence collected by the investigators included bills to fanners sub-
mitted by Stancil for services, cancelled checks of farmers paying for the
custom application of pesticides.  In addition,  several farmers were
willing to testify that they engage Stancil  for custom application ser-
vices and that he did perform these  services.
                             Conclusions

        The defendant entered a plea of Guilty.  He was  convicted and
sentenced to pay a fine of $100 plus the court cost.
                                407

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    HENDERSON COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs.  Ernest Marshall,  1969
       The defendant,  Ernest Marshall, a resident of the State of
Florida, was  charged with operating an aircraft engaged in the custom
application of pesticides without a license from the Commissioner of
Agriculture.  The statutory  authority for the charge was cited as
Chapter  106, Article 4B,  Section 65. 14 of the North Carolina General
Statutes.

       Mr. Jack Atkinson complained to the state investigators that
the defendant  did on numerous occasions, spray his land in an in-
tentional discharge from aircraft.  These nuisance incidents  resulted
in an investigation.   The defendant operated a Steerman aircraft and
engaged without proper license in the custom application of pesticides.
                              Conclusions

        The defendent entered a plea of Guilty.  An attorney for the
complainant,  Jack Atkinson,  sat at the trail as  a friend of the State.
The judgement of the court was six months  sentence of imprisonment
suspended for five years on the conditions that: (1) the defendant not
fly over the property of Jack Atkinson, (2) the defendant not spray within
two miles  of the  City of Hendersonville,  North Carolina, (3) the defendant
not spray within  one mile of Jack Atkinson's property,  (4) the defendant
not apply any pesticides without a valid license  from the Commissioner
of Agriculture and (5) the defendant pay the  court cost.
                                408

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                    BEAUFORT COUNTY COURT

            State of North Carolina vs. James Clark,  1969
       The defendant, James Clark, a resident of Iowa was charged with
operating an aircraft engaged in the custom application of pesticides
without a license.  The charge was a violation of Chapter 106,  Article 4B,
Section 65. 14 of the North Carolina General Statutes.

       A warrant was issued and bond posted in the amount of  $200.  A
farmer testified he had been contacted by Rodney Godley, an advance
agent (spotter) and had engaged the services of the firm represented
by Godley.  He also testified he  had witnessed the actual spraying per-
formed by the defendant.
                             Conclusions

        The defendant entered a plea of Guilty.  He was convicted.  The
 sentence imposed was a $100 fine plus the  court cost.
                                  409

-------
                             BRIEF OF
                   STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                   CLEVELAND COUNTY COURT

           State of North Carolina vs. James E.  Ellis, 1969

       The defendant, James E. Ellis, a native of Cleveland, Nqrth
Carolina, was charged with violating the General Statutes of North
Carolina, specifically Chapter 106, Article 4B,  Section 65.14.

       Several farmers  informed the investigator that the defendant had
been engaged by them and did perform the custom application of pesti-
cides. A warrant was issued for the defendant.   The case was continued
three times.   At the time of the trial the first witness expressed a loss
of memory.  At the suggestion of the prosecutor, the investigator
obtained two new warrants.  These warrants  cited that violation occurred
on the particular lands of each of the two farmers.
                             Conclusions

       The case was continued nine times.  The State of North Carolina
enforcement officials informed the county prosecutors they would appear
when the parties were present.  Substantial time has passed and the
case has since been nol pressed.
                                  410

-------
                              BRIEF OF
                    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
                     PAMLICO COUNTY  COURT

        State of North Carolina vs. Daniel Emery Jones,  1970
       The defendant,  Daniel Emery Jones, a pilot was charged with
engaging in the custom application of pesticides without a license in
violation of Chapter  106,  Article 4B, Section 65. 14 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina.

       This charge arose from an incident in which the defendant
operated an aircraft for Mr. R. E. King, the aircraft owner.  The
defendant sprayed a  pesticide containing methyl parathion on a field of
sweet corn belonging to Sam Jones, a farmer,  adjacent to a housing
project.   It was reported that the  spray also landed on  several black
residents of a family living in the housing project.  The residents got
sick but would not go to a doctor after the investigator  requested them
to do so.
                              Conclusion

        The defendant entered a plea of Guilty.   The judgement was
that the defendant pay the court cost.
                                    411
 »U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1972 723-851/44  1-3       ^''

-------