ill
      O
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAMS
PATTERNS OF PESTICIDE USE AND REDUCTION IN USE

  AS RELATED TO SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS

-------
                 PESTICIDES STUDY SERIES - 10

 PATTERNS OF PESTICIDE USE AND REDUCTION IN USE  AS RELATED
                TO SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS
This study  is  the result of an interagency  agreement made by
OWP as part of the Pesticides Study  (Section  5(1)  (2) P.L.
91-224) with the Economic Research Service  of the  United
States Department of Agriculture.

The USDA project members:

     Theodore  R. Eichers, Member, Farm Pesticides  Group
     Robert P. Jenkins, Member, Farm Pesticides Group
     Paul A. Andrilenas, Member, Farm Pesticides Group
     Helen  T.  Blake, Member, Farm Pesticides  Group
     Austin S. Fox, Leader, Farm Pesticides Group
For EPA:

     Charles  D.  Reese, Project Officer
     Carlton  J.  Kempter, Project Member
               ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   Office of Water  Programs
    Water  Quality and Non-Point Source Control Division
               Non-Point Source Control Branch
        For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.80

-------
                     EPA Review Notice
This report/has been reviewed by the Office of Wator-
Programs of the Environmental Protection Agency and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the
Environmental Protection Agency, or does mention of trade
names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.

-------
                        ACKNOWLEDGMENTS




Many persons  made valuable contributions to this work.   Although




it is not possible to mention all of  them, we wish to acknowledge




the great helpfulness of State Public Health Officials  who supplied




information on health uses of pesticides.  Among individuals, we




are especially indebted to Dr. William H. Wymer, Subcommittee on




Pesticides of the President's Cabinet Committee on the  Environment,



for assistance in bringing together information on expected use of




pesticides by Federal Agencies; to Mr. D. Lee Fowler, Agricultural




Stabilization and Conservation Service, for examining the data




related to manufacturer's production  and sales; and to  Dr. Ronald




L. Mighell, Economic Research Service, for thoroughly reviewing the




manuscript.









          The  EPA project  officer wishes  to express




    thanks to Mrs. Babette Baltes,  Mrs.  Nyla Linthicuiti




    and  Mrs.  Lydia Greene for outstanding service as




    secretaries  in the preparation  of this report.

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS


Chapter I.  PRODUCTION AND USE OP PESTICIDES

                                                       Page

PRODUCTION OP PESTICIDES	   1

  Fungicides	   1
  Herbicides, Defoliants, Desiccants, and
    Growth Regulators	   4
  Insecticides	   6

PRESENT USE	   9

  Distribution of Pesticides Among Users	   9
  Exports	   9
  Domestic Disappearance	  12

NEED FOR CONTROLS	  17

LIST OP REFERENCES	  18

-------
Chapter II.  USE PATTERNS AND APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES
SUMMARY	   19

  Agricultural Use	•   19
  Urban-Suburban Use	   21
  Industrial Use	   22
  Health Uses	   23
  Other Uses	   25
  Method, Formulation, and Season of Application...   26

PURPOSE OF PESTICIDE USE	   28

  Insect Control	   30

     Agricultural Use	   30
     Urban-Suburban Use	   31
     Industrial Use	   33
     Public Health Use	   36
     Other Uses	   40

  Disease Control	   41

     Agricultural Use	   41
     Urban-Suburban Use	   42
     Industrial Use	   43
     Other Uses	   44

  Weed Control	   44

     Agricultural  Use	   45
     Urban-Suburban Use	   46
     Industrial Use	   47
     Public Health Use	   43
     Other Uses	   49

  Other Pest Control	   50

     Agricultural  Use	   51
     Urban-Suburban Use	        53
     Public Health Use	\\	   ^
     Other Uses	

-------
                                                          Page

KINDS AND QUANTITIES OF PESTICIDES USED	   54

  National Use of Pesticides	   55

    Agricultural Use	   55
      Farm Products on Which Pesticides are Used	   59
      Types of Pesticides Used on Crops	   61
      Pesticide Use on Livestock	   65
    Urban-Suburban Use	   66
    Industrial Use	   68
    Public Health Use	   72
    Other Uses	   73
      Use by Federal Government Agencies	   73
      Use by Other Government Agencies	   76

  Regional Use of Pesticides	   77

  Pesticide Use by States	   80

     Agricultural Use	   *0
     Urban-Suburban Use.	   83
     Industrial Use	   84

METHOD, FORMULATION, AND SEASON OF APPLICATION	   84

  Agricultural Use	   85

    Application of Pesticides	   85
    Pesticides Formulations	   86
    Aerial Application of Pesticides	   89
    Seasonality of Pesticide Use	   90

  Urban-Suburban Use	   92

  Industrial Use	   93

  Public Health Use	   95

  Other Uses	   95

LIST OF REFERENCES	   97

-------
Chapter III.  ANALYSIS OP THE MEANS AVAILABLE FOR REDUCING
              PESTICIDE USE
                                                            Page

INTRODUCTION	.	  101

INTEGRATED CONTROL	  101

BIOLOGICAL AND GENETIC CONTROL	  103

CULTURAL AND MANAGERIAL CONTROL	  105

PEST RESISTANT CROPS	  107

RESTRICTING PESTICIDE USE	  108

POTENTIAL FOR MINIMIZING USE OF PERSISTENT PESTICIDES	  112

RESEARCH NEEDS	  116

LIST OF REFERENCES	  119

-------
LIST OF TABLES
                                    Page No.
Chapter I.  PRODUCTION AND USE OF PESTICIDES

Table No.

    1        Production, exports, and domestic use
             of pesticide, by type of pesticide, United
             States, 1950, 1955, and 1960-70	    2

    2        Fungicide production, United States, 1950,
             1955, 1960, and 1965-70	    3

    3        Production of herbicides, United States,
             1950, 1955, 1960, and 1965«?0	    5

    4        Production of insecticides, United States,
             1950, 1955, 1960, and 1965-70	    7

    5        Percentage of domestic use of pesticides
             by principal kinds of use, United States
             average, 1968-70	   10

    6        Exports of pesticides, United States, 1950,
             1955, 1960, and 1965-70	   11

    7        Domestic disappearance of   selected pesticides
             United States, 1950, 1955, 1960, and 1965-
             69	   13

    8        Imports of rotenone and rotenone  containing
             materials by whole root and powdered material,
             United States, 1980-70	   15

    9        Imports of pyrethrum flowers and extract,
             United States, 1960-70	   16


Chapter II.  USE  BATTERNS AND APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES

Table No.                                              Page No.

    1        Gomroon forest insects that can be
             controlled with insecticides....	     35

    2        Selected human diseases transmitted by
             Arthropods in North, Central, and South
             America	     37

-------
Table No.                                       Page No.
    3        Farmer's expenditures for pesticides
             in the United States, 1960-70	   56

    4        Pesticide use by farmers, United
             States, 1966 and estimated 1969	   57

    5        Use of selected pesticides and
             percentage used by farmers, United
             States, 1966	   58

    6        Farm use of pesticides for different
             purposes, United States, 1966	   59

    7        Leading crops in terms of quantities
             of all pesticides used, United States,
             1966	   60

    8        Leading crops in terms of expenditures
             for pesticides, United States, 1966... 61

    9        Quantities of pesticides used on crops
             by type of pesticide, United States,
             1966	 62

    10        Expenditures for pesticides used on
             crops  by type of pesticide, United
             States, 1966	 62

    11        Insecticides used on selected kinds
             of livestock, United States, 1966	 65

    12        Leading insecticides used on livestock,
             United States,  1966	 66

    13        Shipments of household insecticides and
             repellents, United States, 1958-67	  67

    14        Estimated extent and cost of chemical
             weed  control on lawns and turf, United
             States,  1959, 1962, 1965, and 1968	  68

    15        Estimated cost  and extent of chemical
             weed  control, selected uses, United
             States,  1959, 1962,  1965, and 1968	  71

    16        Farm  pesticide  use, by farm production
             region,  United  States, 1966

-------
Table No.
                                      Page No.
   17
   18
   19
Application of farm pesticides, by
persons making the application and
type of equipment used, United States,
1958 and 1964	   86

Percentage of acres treated with her-
bicides and insecticides, by method of
application, 5 Lake States, 1969 and
1970	     89

Acreage treated with weed control
chemicals, by time of application,
United States, 1959, 1962, 1965, and
1968	     91
Chapter  III.
Table  No.
 ANALYSIS OF THE MEANS AVAILABLE FOR
 REDUCING PESTICIDE USE

                                     Page No.

Costs of substituting organophos-
phate and carbonate insecticides for
organochlorines in cotton, corn,
peanut, and tobacco production, United
States, 1966	  110

Effects of  restricting the use of
phenoxy herbicides in farm production,
United States, 1969	  Ill

Economic effects of restricting 2, 4,
5-*, if other phenoxy herbicides and
all Ofcher registered herbicides could  have
been used. United States, 1969	   112

Economic effects of restricting 2, 4,
5-1, if no phenoxy herbicides could
have been used, but all fcfcher registered
herbicides  could  have been  used. United States,
1969	114

-------
                         APPENDIX TABLES

Table No.                                                        Page No.
   1       Farm Use of Insecticides  by Crops,U.S.  1964 & 1966       122
   2       Leading Insecticides  Used on Crops  in the U.S.,  1966     123
   3       Farm Use of Herbicides, by Crops,  U.S., 1964 & 1966      124
   4       Leading Herbicides  Used on Crops by Farmers in the
             U.S.,  1966                                            125
   5       Farm Use of Fungicides, by Crops,  U.S., 1964 & 1966      126
   6       Leading Fungicides  Used on Crops by Farmers in the
             U.S., 1966                                             127
   7       Farm Use of Miscellaneous Pesticides  on Crops, U.S.
             1964 & 1966                                            128
   8       Leading Miscellaneous Pesticides Used on Crops by
             Farmers in the United States, 1966                      129
   9       Leading Pesticides  Used on Selected Crops,  U.S.  1970      130
  10       Leading Insecticides  Used on Selected Classes  of
             Livestock, United States, 1970                          131
  11       Use of Principal Kinds of Wood Preservatives,  U.S.,
             1965-69                                                132
  12       Use of Mercury in Pesticide Manufacture, U.S.  1946-69     133
  13       Producers' Shipments  of Copper Sulfate  by End  Uses
             United States, 1960-69                           '       134
  14       Pesticides Currently  Employed in Mosquito Control         135
  15       Organophosphorus Insecticides for  Use in Fly  Control      137
  16       Quantity and Cost of Pesticides Used  in Forest Insect
             Control Programs, by kinds, United  States,  Fiscal
             Years 1967-70                                          13g
  17       Extent and Cost of Herbicides Used  to Treat Forest
             Plantings, by Region, United States,  1965 & 1968       140
  18       Quantities of Pesticides  Used and  Acres Treated  for
             Specified Purposes  with Selected  Herbicides  by
             Government Agencies, United States, 1969

-------
Table No.                                                        Page No.

  19       Acreage of Land Treated and Cost Per Acre for Brush
             and Weed Control Under Agricultural Conservation
             Program (ACP), United States, 1960-69                  142

  20       Acreage of Range!and and Pastureland Treated for
             Control of Brush Under Agriculture Conservation
             Program, by States, 1966-69                            143

  21       Major Federal Agencies Requesting the Use of
             Pesticides in Pest Control Programs and Acres
             to be Treated, January-August 1971                     144

  22       Important Pesticides Requested for Use and Acres
             to be Treated by Federal Agencies, January-
             August 1971                                            145

  23       Acreage Treated Annually with selected Herbicides
             for Agricultural and Nonagricultural Uses, U.S.        146

  24       Selected Major Insecticides Used on Crops by
             Farmers, by Regions, United States, 1966               147

  25       Selected Major Herbicides Used on Crops by
             Farmers, by Regions, United States, 1966               149

  26       Selected major Fungicides Used on Crops by Farmers
             by Regions, United States, 1966                        150

  27       Cash Expenditures for  Farm Pesticides, by States,
             1955 and 1970                                          151

  28       Estimated Agreage of Crops Harvested and Treated
             with Herbicides and Insecticides 5 Lake States,
             1969 & 1970                                            152

  29       Estimated Acreage of Crops Treated with Pesticides
             by Type of Control 5 Lake States, 1969 & 70            153

  30       Acreage of Corn Treated with Insecticides, 5 Lake
             States, 1970

  31       Acreage of Small Grains treated with Insecticides,
           5 Lake States, 1970                                      155

  32       Acreage of Hay Treated with Insecticides, 5 Lake
             States, 1970                                           156

  33       Acreage of Corn Treated with Herbicides, 5 Lake
             States, 1970                                           157

  34       Acreage of Soybeans Treated with Herbicides, 5
             Lake States, 1970                                      158

-------
Table No.                                                       Page No.
  35       Acreage of Small  Grains Treated with Herbicides,
             5 Lake States,  1970                                    159
  36       Acreage of Crops  Treated for Insect and Weed Control
             In Selected States, 1964 and 1969                      160
  37       Quantities of Selected Kinds of Pesticides by Users,
             Utah, 1969 and  1970                                    161
  38       Quantities of Insecticides Used for Residential
             Insect Control, California, 1970                       162
  39       Quantities of Herbicides Used for Residential
             Weed Control, California, 1970                         163
  40       Quantities of Insecticides Used for Structural
             Pest Control, California, 1970                         164
  41       Percentage of All Pesticide Sales Reported in
             California that Were Used by Government Agencies
             in 1970                                                165
  42       Extent of Custom Application of Chemical  Weed Control
             Materials, United States, 1959, 1962, 1965, and 1968   166
  43       Percentage of Expenditures for Pesticides, by Form of
             Application and by Crop, United States, 1964 & 1966    167
  44       Extent of Preemergence and Postemergence Chemical Weed
             Control in the United States, 1968                     168
  45       Extent of Preemergence or Postemergence Chemica:  Weed Control
             in the United States, 1968                             169
  46       Seasonal Distribution of use, all Pesticides, by Major
             Uses, California, 1970
  47       Seasonal Distribution of Pesticide Use, by Types,
             California, 1970                              '

-------
                             PREFACE

     Numerous forces affect societyfs goals and the means
for achieving them.  Some forces may complement each other,
while others are either independent or conflicting.  It is
difficult to isolate and describe the interrelationships
between social, economic and technological forces that are
reflected in our system.  Different groups committed to
different values react differently (positively or negatively
or simply indifferent) to a specific situation.  Economic
circumstances have a dominant influence on society's goals
and objectives.  In a poor society nothing is as important
as poverty and nothing is as imperative as its mitigation.
Economic drives are also influential on social attitudes and
goals as one moves from poverty to affluency.  As society's
material needs are satisfied, people become increasingly
concerned with the environment.  The priorities of an
affluent society take on a new dimension, that of securing
pleasant and safe surroundings.  This  evolutionary process
introduces new problems in attempting to attain harmony
among the multiple objectives of society.

     Factors that influence pesticide use, related pesticide
pollution, with the resulting need for control, depend upon
the goals or objectives of society.  The demand for the use
of natural and man-made resources, including pesticides, is
derived from the products and services, including

-------
environmental features, desired by society.  The "mix" or
balance that is achieved between the consumption of material
goods and enjoyment of environmental features is conditioned
by the qoals and objectives of society.  Thus, the demand
for pesticides is derived from the need to control pests for
the achievement of low cost, high quality food and fiber,
while simultaneously obtaining a high quality, healthful
natural environment from which society derives esthetic,
cultural, physiological and psychological pleasures.
     Unfortunately, conflicts over goals and objectives have
focused on the means of achieving an individual goal without
fully recognizing the interrelationships among goals or the
third-party "spill-over" effects resulting from an action
taken to achieve a particular objective.  This has resulted
in a resource policy perspective that is focused on
alternative means to an objective and excludes
considerations of the conflicts and/or complementarities
among goals.
     Knowledge concerning the nature of the demands for the
products and healthful conditions which pesticides make
possible is inadequate.  Since conflicts have arisen over
pesticide use, it may be assumed that there are areas of
conflict with respect to the demand for final products and
services desired by society,  The full range of these
conflicts has not been explored.  The demand is qualitative
as well as quantitive and consequently trade-offs between
                                  ii

-------
material goods and environmental features are qualitative as
well as quantitive.  In addition, a policy framework should
consider not only the aggregate of these demands but also
the distribution.  Our sense of equity and equal opportunity
requires that resource policy decisions include
consideration of who will be affected by the decision as
well as the physical effects of the decision.  Thus, the
package of socio-economic information that is needed to
determine a pesticide control policy include (1) an
understanding of society's relative preference between low
cost food and fiber, and environmental features and
conditions;  (2) information on the consequences of
alternative pest control actions in terms of the quantity
and cost of food and fiber production; (3)  information on
the environmental consequences of alternative pest control
actions; and  (4) information on the incidence of the effects
of alternative pest control actions, i.e.,  costs to
producers, consumers and taxpayers, and benefits to
environmental user groups, and maintenance of ecological
balance for species preservation, including human survival.
     Far more is known about the supply of products and the
factor relationships including pesticides and alternate
inputs.  For example, studies reported elsewhere in this
report deal with the effects on output of restricting or
banning certain pesticides and the consequent effect on
production costs.  Other studies have focused on the
substitution of factors, for example, additional cropland
                                iii

-------
for insecticides,  Here again much remains to be done.



Little is known about the relationships between labor, non-



land capital, and pesticides.  While some research has been



done on production costs, little has been done to determine



how these costs would ultimately be distributed throughout



the economy.







     Until more information is developed on the areas



outlined above, it is difficult to develop a comprehensive



strategy for controlling pesticide pollution,
                                IV

-------
           Chapter I





PRODUCTION AND USE OF PESTICIDES

-------
                  PRODUCTION AND USE OF PESTICIDES

                      Production of Pesticides

     Total production of all pesticides rose in the 1960's  and reached

nearly 1.2 billion pounds in 1968, but dropped slightly to  1.0 billion

pounds in 1970. I/  This was still about 50 percent higher  than in  I960.

Most of the rise was in herbicide production, which nearly  tripled
                                         •..
from 196l to 19TO (table 1).  Insecticide production moved  upward,  with

some fluctuations, from 368 million pounds  in I960 to nearly  600 million

pounds in 1968 and 1969.  However, 1970 production was down to about

500 million pounds.  Fungicide production fluctuated between  139

million pounds and 197 million pounds during the 1955 to 1970 period

and amounted to 169 million pounds in 1970.


Fungicides

     Since 1965, production of some organic fungicides has  been rising

while that of inorganics has been falling (table 2).  Major organic

'fungicides include captan, ferbam, zineb, maneb, pentachlorophenol,

organic mercuries, karathane, and dodine.  Major inorganics include

sulfur and copper sulfate, but production of sulfur is not  distinguish-

able between use for pesticides and for other purposes from available

data.-  Copper sulfate production for agricultural purposes  dropped  from
  I/  Chemical pesticides are customarily classified into three major
groups—fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides.   As the names imply,
these are chemicals used mainly to kill or inhibit harmful fungi,  weeds,
and insects.  For convenience, several other groups of chemicals used in
smaller quantities, are often reported in the statistics for the three
main groups.  For example, fumigants, nematocides, and rodenticides are
included in insecticides.  Some chemicals not used to control weeds are
included in the herbicide classification.  These are growth regulators,
defoliants, and desiccants.

-------
Table 1.—Production, exports, and domestic use of pesticides, by type of pesticide, United States, 1950, 1955,
                                                         and 1960-70
Year

1955 	
f
iggpi 	
1963 	
1961* 	
1066
1067
1968 	
1 Q7O— — — —

Fungicides I/ j Herbicides 2/ |
Produc-;
tion ; a

• 95
187
197
168
153
139
11*6
151
179
178
191
• 182
169
. 'Domestic' Produc-' _ . 'Domestic :
xports: use I*/ : tion : ExPor*8' U3e y -
* — * • • » ^J .

I/
82
50
37
30
36
1*2
23
28
23
23
2U
26

I/ 73
105 5/
1U7 110
131 123
123 135
103 151*
10U 196
128 220
151 272
155 31*8
168 1*03
158 372
1U3 353

19
22
23
29
36
31
37
5»*
59
66
Vlillion i
91
101
112
125
160
189
235
299
313
287
Insecticides 3/
1 All pesticides
Produc-' ,, . 'Domestic* Produc-
, . : Exports : i, / : ...
tion , % use V ^ tion


261*
5/
36"8.
391
1*76
1*89
1*63
502
562
501*
582
581
501 1 ^T-

115
193
252
286
2 1*7
253
213
2l*5
268
318
263
21*2
I/ Excludes sulfur.
2/ Includes growth regulators , defoliants and desiccants , but not petroleum.
3/ Includes soil and space fumigants and rodenticides but not petroleum.
TT/ Production less exports. No adjustments have been made for inventory changes
5j Not available.

ll*9
5/
119
139
190
2 1*2
210
289
317
236
26U
318
259
or
•• i
1*32
506
675
682
761*
782
805
873
1,013
1,030
1,176
1,135
1,023
imports .
Exports

178
291
318
311
339
312
331
267
310
3l*0
395
33U

|Domesti
use U/

25U
215
357
371
1*25
1*70
606
703
690
781
789
689

      Source:  Agr.  Stabil.  and Conserv. Serv, (l, 2, 3)

-------
Table 2.—Fungicide production, United States, 1950, 1955, I960, and 1965-70
Fungicide

Inorganics I/
Copper sulfate 2/ 	
Organics


T\Tn"V- i»rt

Pentachlorophenol — 	 	
2 ,U ,5-Trichlorophenol 	
Zin<;b 7/ — -
Copper naphthenate — ~—


Other organica- — — 	 	
All organics 	 — 	
All fungicides I/ 	
1950



3/87.9

1| /
H/
1| /
3.U
1.1
2.9
y
5/
7.U
95.3
> 1955



36.3

|/
i/
6/31. U
3,8
1.0
2.U
I/
112.3
150.9
187.2
*
: I960
*



33.3

2.5
3.0
39-3
10.0
0.9
1.9
0.9
10U.9
163. U
196.7
: 1965



U7.3

2.U
2.5
Uo.o
U.O
5.1
3.3
1.6
UU.8
103.7
151.0
: 1966
-Million pou

1»1.5

l.U
2.1
U3.3
17-9
U.7
3.2
1.0
63.8
137. U
178.9
: 1967
*



3U.O

2.3
l.U
UU.2
25.3
3.1
3.5
0.9
63.2
1U3.9
177.9
: 1968



37.2

1.9
5/2.0
U8.6
28.1
3.1
1.7
l.U
66.8
153.6
190.8
: 1969
*
*



U2.1

3/1.5
1.9
U6.0
5/
3/2.5
1.5
0.9
85.7
lUo.o
182.1
: 1970



28.8

5_/
5/
U7.2
5/

1.7
1.1
89.7
139.7
168.5
  I/  Data on inorganic fungicides available for copper sulfate  only.  Other inorganic fungicides
fixed coppers and inorganic mercury compounds are not included.
  2j  Data for copper sulfate represents only production designated as shipments to agriculture.
sulfate production was 91 million pounds in 1970.
  3/  Estimated.
  5/  Not available.
  5/  Included in other organics.
  6/  1956 data.
      Includes ziram.
                                                                                                  such  as  sulfur,

                                                                                                  Total copper
  Source:  Agr. Stabil. and Conserv. Serv. (l, 2, 3)

-------
88 million pounds in 1950 to about 29  million in  1970.   Pentachlorophenol



production rose from 31 to U9 million  pounds  between  1955 -and 1968 and



then fell off slightly.





Herbicides, Defoliants, Desiccants, and Growth Regulators



     Total herbicide production was 353 million pounds  in 1970,  down

                 .                       *

from U03 million pounds in 1968 (table 3).  These totals include data



for plant hormones, defoliants and desiccants.  The high mark in 1968



reflects the influence of large military purchases.



     The major nonproprietary herbicides are  2,^-D, 2,U,5-T  and  sodium



chlorate.  Other important herbicides  have been developed in recent
                                                                X


years.  Many of these are proprietary  products  and separate  data are



not published for them.  Among the newer products are atrazine,  Sutan,



propazine, propachlor, paraquat, simazine, DCPA,  dicamba, trifluralin,



Amiben, Linuron, and propanil.  Oil is sometimes  used as a herbicide,



often in combination with other materials.  Ho estimate of the oil used



for this purpose is available.  Arsenic compounds such  as MSMA and DSMA



are also widely used for weed control  in cotton.



     The first of the Ingportant phenoxy herbicides, 2,U-D came into



use in the United States after World War II»   By  1950,  about 26  million



pounds were being produced annually.  Further upward  impetus was pro-



vided by military use in Vietnam beginning in 1963.   By 1968 production



was 91* million pounds annually.  Military use was largely discontinued



by 1969 and production of 2,^-D was down to kk million  pounds in 1970.



     Also a phenoxy herbicide, 2,^,5-T was  similarly  affected by the



Vietnam situation., From less than( k million  pounds in  1955, production



moved upward to 1»2.5 million pounds in 1968,  and then dropped to about'



12 million pounds in 1970-

-------
Table 3.—Production of herbicides, United States 1950, 1955, I960, and 1965-70 I/ •
Herbicide
2,U-D (acids, esters, and
OO.11 3 )_-!-.. ••- _____________
2,U,5-T (acids, esters,
rtnr} -inl-ha }-._..____-....._____
Sodium chlorate 	 ______
Other herbicides 	
All herbicides I/ 	
1950
•
: 1955
t
•
•
: I960
*
•
•
: 1965
•
*
*
»
; 1966
•
: 1967
•
•
: 196ft
•
*
*
: 1969
•
: 1970
*

25.8
1.9
2/UU.2
0.8
72.7
20.5
• 3.8
_i/93.9
5/
I/
3U.O
7.9
'i»/35.0
33.2
110.1
63.U 72.5 83.8
13.5 18.1 27.2
1_/32.0 i/30.0 _/30.0
111.1
220.0
11*9. U
212.0
207.3
3U8.3
9>t. 1
1*2.5
i/30.0
236.2
1*02.8
57.0
11.6
lj/30.0
273.2
371.8
2./U3.5
12.3
Ji/30.0
266.8
6/352.6
  I/  Includes some materials used as defoliants, desiccants, or growth regulators.
  2j  Acid basis.
  3/  Includes material used for nonherbicidal purposes.
  F/  Agricultural use estimated by pesticide specialists in Agr. Stabil.  and Consery.  Serv.  Total production
Of sodium chlorate in I960 was 183.2 million pounds.
  5_/  Not available.
  6/  Includes only 2,I*-D acid so production is under reported by several  million.

  Source:  Agr. Stabil. and Conserv. Sftrv. (l, 2, 3)

-------
     Sodium chlorate, an inorganic weed killer, vas  more widely "used in



the 1950's and early 1960's, tut its production for  herbicidal purposes




stabilized at about 30 million pounds in recent years.  Barring



limitations on use of other herbicides for cotton, sodium  chlorate



production for herbicidal purposes is not expected to increase signifi-




cantly.






Insecticides



     This category also includes materials used as space and soil fumigants



and as rodenticides.  Total insecticide production increased from 26U



million pounds in 1950 to 582 million pounds in 1968, but  dropped to




just over 500 million pounds in 1970 (table U).



     Most of the insecticides fit under three main  groups:  inorganics,



or gano chlorine s, and organophosphates, with some  also  classified as



carbonates or other organies.  Araen-ates are the  -Largest class oT inor-




ganics.  For many yesrs lead and calcium arsenate were  widely used as



insecticides, but their popularity decreased with the  advent of the




organochlorines.  Production of lead arsenate  in 1970 totaled only




9 million pounds as compared with more than 39 million pounds in 1950.



     Organochlorines became popular after World War II and although



still widely used have become less effective for many purposes.  Many




insects ere -becoming resistant to them.  Among the  major organochlorines




are DDT, aldrin, heptachlor, chlordane, BHC, lindane, toxaphene, dieldrin,



endrin, methoxychlor, TDE,  and Strobane.

-------
Table I*.—Production of insecticides, United States, 1950, 1955, I960,'and 1965-70  I/
Insecticide
Aldrin-toxaphene group 2/-_
Methyl parathion 	 	 	 —
Parathion 	
Lead arsenate 	 — 	
Methyl bromide- 	


1950

3/
78.2
$!
I/
39.1*
2.2
99.2'
26U. 3
: 1955

77.0
129.7
2/
5.2
3.7
§/
: 1960

90.7
161*. 2
11.8
7.U
10.1
6.6
12,7
367.8
: 1965

118.8
ll*0.8
29.1
16.6
7.1
1*.2
170.8
501.7
: 1966
*
•Million pov
130.5
lUl.3
35.9
19.1*
7.3
2.9
16.3
208.6
562.2
: 1967

120.2
103.U
33.3
11.1*
6.0
2.0
19.7
207.8
503.8
: 1968
*

116.0
139.1*
38.2
U/20.0
9.0
3.1*
20.5
235.1
581.6
; 1969
*

107.3
123.1
50.6
!/
9.1
l.U
20.0
269.6
581.1
t
: 1970

88.6
59.3
1*1.1*
15.3
9.0
1.5
21.0
261*. 5
500.6
  I/  May include some space and soil fumigants and rodenticides.
  2_/  Includes aldrin, toxaphene, dieldrin, endrin, strobane, heptachlor,  and chlordane.
  3/  Included in other insecticides.
  5/  Estimated by pesticide specialists of Agr. Stabil.  and Cons.iServ.
  '5/  Not available.

  Source:  Agr. Stabil. and Conserv. 8erv. (l, 2, 3)

-------
     Production of DDT, a major organochlorine, vas begun during World



War II as a mosquito control agent in the fight against malaria.  After




the war, it came into wide use domestically.   Production reached 78




million pounds in 1950 and continued to rise  rapidly until the early




I960's.  Production of DDT had dropped to 123 million pounds by 1969 and




to 60 million pounds in 1970 (table 1»). .



     The aldrin-toxaphene group includes aldrin, toxaphene, dieldrin,




endrin, strobane, heptachlor and chlordane.   In 1955, 77 million pounds



of these materials were produced.  Production reached a high of 131




million in 1966, but by 1969 had receded to 89 million pounds.



     Many organophosphate insecticides are now on the market.  Among



the  most widely used are the methyl and ethyl forms of parathion,



malathion, disulfoton, bidrin, diazinon, trichlorfon, azinphosmethyl,



ethion, phosphamidon, and phorate.  Many of these were developed as



proprietary products, which means that production data for them are not



published.




     Methyl par^thic-n production is rasing as it replaces some



part of the organochlorines on cotton and other crops.  Production in




I960 was 12 million pounds.  Beginning about  1965, production increased



rapidly to more than 50 million pounds in 1969 but fell back to Ul million



in 1970.  Ethyl parathion, a closely related material, has not been



produced in such large quantities although 1970 production amounted to



15 million pounds, after an estimated high of 20 million pounds in 1968.

-------
     Unfortunately, separate data are not available for nematocides.




They are included, in organic fuinigants and other insecticides in table



U.






                             Present Use



Distribution  df  Pesticides Among Users




     Nearly three-fourths of the pesticides manufactured in the United



States  are used  domestically and slightly more than a fourth is exported.



About a fifth of all fungicides and herbicides and slightly more than




half of the insecticides produced in the United States are exported.



Estimates indicate that of the total domestic use farmers account for



about 55 percent, urban-sub urban users for 15 percent, industrial users



20 percent, and  other users (primarily Federal, State, and local



governments)  10  percent  (table  5).






Exports



     Insecticides made up more than two-thirds of the pesticide exports




in 1970.  Herbicides cotrtrib-uted about a fifth, and fungicides less than



a terfth of total pesticide exports (table 6).




     DDT leads all other, insecticides in quantity exported.  Exports



of DDT  reached 109 million pounds in 1968, but fell to TO million in



1970.   Only one  of 13 former manufacturers of DDT still remains in



production..  Worldwide concern over the environment and increasing insect



resistance may further reduce . exports.




     Organic  fumigants primarily nematocides, seem to have experienced




a growing demand for export during the latter half of the 1960's.




Quantities' exported rose from about 10 million pounds in 1965 to about




3k million pounds in 1970.

-------
Table 5.—Percentage of domestic use of
          pesticides by principal kinds
          of use, United States average,
                 1968-70 I/
          Use
   All
pesticides
Farm	

Urban-suburban	

Industry	
Federal, State, and
 local government—
  Total-
' Percent

   55

   15

   20


   10


  100
  if  Estimated by Econ. Res. Serv.  based
on published reports and discussions vith
pesticide specialists in Government  and
industry.

-------
Table 6.—Exports of pesticides, United States, 1950, 1955, I960, and 1965-70
Pesticides
Fungicides I/
CoTmpT «?iil •Pn'hia 9 /________
("VHiF»T" 1 /....___ _~~
vwiu-r jy
All fSinffifi flps 1 /______
Herbicides'
2,1»-D (acid basis) 	 	
2 h S-T fanifl hn
-------
Domestic Disappearance




     Data on domestic use are available for only a few major pesticides.




Military purchases used abroad as well as use in the United States are




included in domestic use.  Since imports of most pesticides, except




pyrethrum and rotenone, are negligible, an estimate of domestic use




of all pesticides can be obtained by subtracting exports from production.




This does not allow for changes in stocks.  Data on domestic use in




table 1 are based on this procedure.  However, data in table 7 do include




inventory adjustments.  Changes in domestic disappearance rates must be




studied carefully before concluding that real changes are actually




occurring.  First the "mix" of pesticides may change over time.  Appli-




cation rates .for the currently popular organophosphates are usually




lower than for organochlorines.  The organochlorines in turn were used




at lower rates than inorganic insecticides.  Thus effective pest pro-




tection may be increasing at the same time that the domestic dis-




appearance rate is decreasing..  Also more spe-cific pesticides are




replacing general pur-pose ones.  This may modify the quantities of




pesticides used.




     Fungicide production has fluctuated considerably but has not




increased in total since 1955 (table l).  Organic fungicide use dropped




between I960 and 196"5 but has been increasing since then.  The use of




most inorganic' fungicides is either constant or decreasing.
                            12

-------
Table  7.—Domestic disappearance of selected pesticides,  United States, 1950, 1955, 1960N, and 1965-69 I/
Pesticide


Copper sulfate 2/ 	
2,U-D (acid basis) 	
2li ^_in foMrl >>flt!-i 
• Z
89.7
•an o
JU . J
2.1
7-7
  I/  Domestic disappearance is the beginning of year inventory + production + imports - exports - end of year
inventory.  Includes military shipments abroad.   Most computations are on a crop year basis, e.g. I960 = Oct. 1, 1959
Sept. 30, I960.
  £/  All copper sulfates including industrial use.   Use  as  pesticides is substantially less than above
indicated data, see table 2.
  3/  Includes aldrin, heptachlor, toxaphene, dieldrin, endrin, strobane, heptachlor, and chlordane.
  V/  Not available.

  Source:  A«v Stabil. and Conserv. Serv. (1, 2, 3)
                                                     13

-------
     Domestic use of herbicides (production less exports)  is  increasing



rapidly (table l).  The types of herbicides used are -also  changing.   The



inorganic types like sodium chlorate and sodium arsenite have largely



given way to the selective organic types such-as the phenoxy  group,



triazines, and cany others.  For some uses, the phenoxy group is  in  turn



giving way to newer herbicides more specifically adapted to treating a



certain crop and pest.



     Domestic disappearance of 2,lt-D and 2,U,5-T showed upward trends



in the last half of the decade of the sixties, mainly because military



use in Vietnam, which is classified with domestic use, was large  (table 7).



However, military use had dropped substantially after 1968.



     There has been a large shift from the inorganic insecticides and



later from the organochlorines to organophosphate and carbamate



insecticides.  Both calcium arsenate and.lead arsenate, the major



inorganics, are used much less than in the 1950's, although quantities



•nay have .stabilized in the late- 1960's (tabl« 7).  Use of  DDT, a major



or gano chlorine, dropped more then 50 percent in the 1960's.   In 19^9, 30
    S


million pounds were still used, down from a high of 70 million in I960.



Use of the aldrin-toxaphene group, which contains many of the most



important organochlorines, has remained relatively stable.



     Rotenone supplies, all imported, totaled 1.7 million  pounds  in  1970



(table 8).  lyrethrum is another imported material.  It is used in



many household pesticide formulations because of its low toxicity to



humans.  It is also much used in dairy barns.  Nearly a million pounds



'of flowers and extracts were imported in 1970 (table 9).
                             14

-------
Table 8.—Iinports of rotenone and rotenone containing
          materials by vhole root and powdered
          material, United States, 1960-70
Year


10^0— 	 - 	 __— 	 _
1 Qfil — 	 _ 	 — 	
1Q
T fi
X«D
In
• 7
r> 0
In
•u
In
.u
3.0
1.8
1 f.
1 9
OQ
•y
•t
| Powdered
] material
•


1-e
• P
2 A
. V
1 ft
x. o
i n
o 6
07
» I
1.0
1.0
i n
1 T
o 8

   Source:  Agr.  Stabil.  and Conserv. Serv. (l)
                         15

-------
Table 9.—Imports of pyrethrum flowers  and extract,
                 United States, 1960-70
Year


IQ^O- 	 	 ' 	 	
TQfil 	 	
TQ<9_ 	 	 	 	
IQfCo 	 „ 	
lQ7
• 1
n <
U .D
0.7
0»7
• 7
n <
U .D
  Source:   Agr.  Stabil.  and Conserv. SerV."(l)
                          16

-------
                          Need for Controls


     Many thousands of lives have been lost to malaria, yellow fever,


plague, and other diseases now controlled by pesticides.  Many allergy


victims have suffered from allergenic weeds.  In addition many hours


of toilsome labor has been saved, utility services have been provided


at less cost, and the environment has been protected from fire, flood,


and pests and its beauty and access maintained by the wise use of


pesticides.


     A comprehensive discussion of the basic purposes for pest control


is presented in Chapter 5 of this report.  The probable effects if


pesticides were not available is illustrated by examples in the section


entitled "Reduction in festicide Use".


     Annual losses from agricultural pests in the United States during


the 1950's were estimated to-exceed $1^ billion (U).   Perhaps a third


of all potential food and fiber produced in the world is lost to pests.


3!his is equivalent to the food needs of a billion people.  In addition


to adverse effects oh agricultural production, pests  endanger human and


anj.fcal health.  Pesticides could prevent part of these damages.  Probably


SrCsae crops could not be produced at all and other crops would become
                       *

much more expensive if pesticides were unavailable.
                                   17

-------
                        List of References

(l)  Fowler, D.  Lee;  Mahan,  John N.;  and Shepard, Harold H.
       19T1 and earlier years.   The Pesticide Review.  Annual issues
             for reporting years 1965 through 1969.  U.S. Dept. Agr. ,
             Agr.  Stabil.  and Conserv. Serv., Feb.

(2)  Shepard, Harold H.  and  Mahan, John N. (with Charlotte A. Graham
      prior to -1963-61))
       1965 and earlier years.   The Pesticide Situation.  Annual issues
             for reporting years 1960-6l through 196U-65-  U.S. Dept.
             Agr., Agr.  .Stabil.  and Conserv. Serv., Sept.

(3)  Shepard, Harold H.;. Mahan,  John N.; and Graham, Charlotte A.
      (with Shepard alone  prior  to 1958-59)
       I960 and earlier years.   The Pesticide Situation.  Annual issues
             for reporting years 1953-51* through 1959-60.  U.S. Dept.
             Agr., Commod. Stabil. Serv., Apr.

(I)  U.S. Department of Agriculture
       1965.  Losses in Agriculture.  .Agr. Res. Serv., Agr. Handbook 291,
               Aug.
                               18

-------
                Chapter II






USE PATTERNS AND APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES

-------
                          STJMMAKY
     Pesticides are important in the current technology for
controlling pests that affect agriculture, public health,
and other aspects of modern life.  Before the development of
chemical pesticides many pests could not be effectively
controlled.  Among these pests are insects, weeds, fungi,
nematodes, and rodents.
                      Agricultural Use
     Pesticides used in agriculture help reduce food and
fiber production costs and may help Icwer prices that
consumers pay for farm products.
     Insects cause economic damage in agriculture by
interfering with growth) and reducing the quality and
quantity of farm output.  Some also transmit diseases and
annoy livestock.

     Fungi have a long history as serious agricultural
pests.   Fungus problems occur most frequently in agriculture
on fruits and vegetables, but other crops are also affected.
                                19

-------
For example, lamping oft of seedlings, Fusarium, and



Verticillium wilts  and rusts, can be serious problems in



smell grains, and in 1970 blight contributed to a 10 percent




reduction in corn yields.








     Herbicides are used by farmers to control weeds.  They



often offer the only practical means of checking weeds in



fence rows, ditch banks, some rangeland areas, and certain



solid-planted crops.  For row crops, herbicides may provide



a  low cost  substitute for mechanical cultivation,



     Rodents damage growing crops, livestock, stored crops,



and  buildings.  other chemicals, classified as agricultural



pesticides, include defoliants and desiccants used as



harvest aids  (particularly in cotton production) and growth



regulators  used for tobacco sucker control, fruit siting



and  thinning, and other purposes,








     Farmers usf slightly more than half of all pesticides



in thr United States.  Their expenditures for pesticides



rose from 3?87 million in 1960 to nearly $900 million in



1970.  Quantity estimates indicate that farmers used 410



million pounds of pesticides in 1969.  of this quantity, ?00



million pounds was insecticides  (including miticides,



fumigants,  rodenticides and repellents), 175 million pounds



was herbicides  (including d^foljants, d^siccants, and plant



growth regulators), and 3^ million pounds was fungicides.
                                20

-------
     Detailed data show that crops accounted for 93 percent
of the pesticides used by farmers in 1966.  Livestock and
other uses each made up about half of the remaining 7
percent.  Cotton and corn accounted for nearly half of all
pesticides used by farmers on crops in 1966.  Cotton was the
leading crop for insecticide use, accounting for 47 percent
of the total use on crops.  Leading insecticides applied to
crops in 1966 were toxaphene, DDT, and aldrin.  About Ul
percent of the herbicid? total was used on corn in 1966.  No
other crop approached this percentage,  Pasture and
range-land and soybeans each accounted for 9 percent of the
herbicides.

     Nearly 60 percent of the livestock insecticides were
used on beef cattle or their premises.  Toxaphene and
methoxychlor were the leading livestock insecticides and
accounted for nearly half of all those used on livestock.
                     Urban-Suburban Use
     Homeowners and other urban and suburban residents use
pesticides in houses, commercial buildings, parks,
reservoirs, and other areas.  Termites are a major urban-
suburban insect problem.  However, many ether insects can be
serious pests in and around the home.  They may attack
people, buildings, furniture, pets, lawns, and clothes.

                               21

-------
     Herbicides are used in residential areas t.c assure



attractive lawns fr^e of unsiqhtly weeds and unwelcome




species of grass.








     In 1970, about $300 million, at retail prices, was



spent for lawn and garden pest control chemicals,  In 1968,



a total of nearly U million acres of lawn and turf was



treated for weed control at a cost of more than $110




million.
                       Industrial Use
     Industrial firms us<= pesticides to protect their



workers, products, facilities, and grounds from  pest damage.



They use insecticides to prevent damaqe to structures from



termites and carpenter ants, to prevent contamination of



food products with foreign matter, and to protect stored



products,  They use fungicides in paint to prevent mildew,



slimicides in manufacturing processes to prevent slime



formation, and algicides to prevent growth of algae in water



supplies.  They also use preservatives to protect wood



products, and a variety of other fungicides.  Industrial



firms use herbicides to control weeds and brush.  Large



amounts are used in maintaining rights-of-way.
                               22

-------
     In 1970, industrial firms spent an estimated $300
million on pesticide chemicals.  This was up from about $110
million in 1965.
     Important fungicides used in industry include copper
sulfate, mercury products, and such wood preservatives as
pentachlorophencl.  Appreciable amounts of persistent
pesticides are used to control pests in structures.

     In 1969, utility companies treated about 6 trillion
acres of weed and brush control with 2,4-D or ?,4,5-T.
                        Health Uses
     Some of the major communicable diseases of the world
are transmitted by insects and other pest vectors.
Important vector-borne diseases include malaria, yellow
fever, encephalitis, and typhus.  Malaria cases in India
were reported at 75 million a year in 1952 with nearly 5
million deaths prior to the use of insecticides.  After 10
years of spraying with insecticides, the number of cases
dropped to 5 million a year and the number of deaths to
100,000.

     Vector-borne diseases are not generally considered a
                             23

-------
serious problem in the United States, although some were
reported in many States in the last 3 years.  The most
prevalent vector-borne disease in the United States is Rocky
Mountain fever, which cannot be effectively controlled with
insecticides.

     Some vertebrate animals can also become public health
pests when they transmit disease.  Rats are the most serious
vertebrate pests.

     Control of disease vectors account for a significant
share of the pesticides used in some of the developing
nations.  However, pesticide use for human health control in
the United States is small.
     In 1971, Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (VEE)  covered a
large part of Texas and adjoining areas.  The major
insecticides used in vector spray programs in the United
States in recent years is malathion.  In large operations,
it is usually applied in ultra low volume (ULV)  formulations
and at rates of only a few ounces per acre.   Other
insecticides frequently used for disease control of insects
that are vectors include Abate, Fenthiori, and naled.

     Chemicals used to control vertebrate pests include
anticoagulants, zinc phosphide, sodium fluoracetate,
strychnine,  and thallium sulfate.
                              24

-------
                         Other Uses
     Pesticides are also applied by other users,  Government
agencies at the Federal, State and local levels are
important amcnq these ether users.  Federal agencies planned
to treat 21 million acres with pesticides in the first 8
months of 1971.  A large part of this was accounted for by
the VEE and the fire ant control programs.

     In 1970 about 310,000 pounds of insecticides and
fumigants were used by the Forest service for insect
control.  Important pesticides were ethylene dibromide,
malathion, BHC and lindane..  Trees are sub-ject to many kinds
of fungous disease but few are serious enough to require
direct control.

     Many insects are nuisances as well as health or
agricultural problems.  Mosquito control districts, for
example, spent $75 tc $100 million annually in recent years
to control mosquitoes, primarily because  of their nuisance
characteristics.

     Weeds are nuisance, safety and esthetic problems.  They
can become serious in aquatic, recreational, forest, and
transportation rights-of-way areas.
                                25

-------
       Method^ Formulatign^and,,Season o£_Application
     Pesticides can  he  applied either as liquids  or  dry
materials.  Liquids  are qenerally preferred because  they are
less bulky to handle  and apply than dusts.  They  also adhere
to surfaces better than dry materials and spray application
equipment is more often available.  Granules ar<=>  gaininq in
popularity because they are more convenient to handle.

     Liquid sprays accounted for three-fourths of the pesticides used
by farmers in 1966 and for 95 percent or more of the farmer's  pesticide
expenditures for wheat,  rice, other small grains, sugar beets, alfalfa
and other hay, pasture and rangeland, citrus, apples, and other decid-
uous fruit.

     Pesticides are  applied with qround or air equipment.
In 1964, about 80 percent of the farm pesticides  were
applied with qround  and 20 percent with air equipment.   This
was almost the same  distribution as in 1958.  In  1971,  there
were about 2,200 aqricultural pesticide aviation  operations
with about 6,100 aircraft.

     seasonally, pesticide applications may be spread over a
large part of the  year  especially in the warm areas  of the
country.  However, the  major share is applied durinq the
summer months.  Farm herbicides are beinq put on  earlier in
                                26

-------
the season as a larger proportion is being applied as a



preemerqence treatment.  Preemergance weed treatment of farm



crops increased from 7 percent in 1959 to U3 percent in



1968.
                                  27

-------
                  PURPOSE OF PESTICIDE USE
     Pesticides have become a integral part of modern

living.  They are used by farmers, homeowners, industry, and

Governments to control pests of all kinds,  Until the

introduction of chemical pesticides many pests could not be

controlled satisfactorily.  Pesticides reduce food and fiber

production costs, protect yields and quality, help control

certain vector-borne pathogens, and they may lower the

prices that consumers pay for food products.l



     Commercial pesticides comprise some 1,000 basic

chemicals applied variously to crops, farm products,

processed and stored goods, soil, water, service structures,

and homes,  They minimize and control the harm done by

pests.  Pesticides are categorized according to the kind of

pest, controlled, as fungicides, herbicides, insecticides,

nematocides, and rodenticides.  In the United States,

estimates of the number of species of main kinds of pests

are as follows(16):
  I/  A vector is a living organism, such as an insect, which
  transmits a pathogen from one host to another.
                               28

-------
               fungi  (plus viruses
                      and bacteria)         8,500 species
               weeds                        2,200 species
               nematodes                      500 species
               arthropods2  (plus
                      small animals)       10,050 species
               rodents and birds              210 species
     However, a relatively small number of the species
listed account for 80 percent of all pesticides used.

     The technology of modern pesticides is an important
component of the continuing agricultural revolution that has
so greatly increased the capability of the United States
farmer in the last century.  The use of pesticides and
related chemicals is bound up with modern agricultural
technology:  in seed and soil treatments and soil
fumigations, in pre- and post-emergence weed control, in
chemical crop control, in defoliation, in routine treatment
of farm plants and animals with miticides, insecticides, and
fungicides, and in post-harvest pest control and
preservation.

     In our present complex system of specialized and
mechanized agriculture, the use of pesticides may often mean
the margin between profit and loss.  In developing countries
where food supplies are highly variable, pesticides may mean
the difference between survival and starvation,
  2/  Arthropods include insects,  mites,  spiders,  ticks,  scorpions,
  tarantulas, and other organisms  in  the  Hexapoda, Arachnida,  and
  Crustacea classes.
                           29

-------
     The annual loss caused by pests of crops, forests,



livestock, and farm products in the United States has been



estimated to be over $14 billion with an additional loss of



more than $2 billion during storage and marketing (16).
                       Insect Control
     Historically, insects have been a major pest problem.



They have been responsible for major disease outbreaks and



freguently have been the cause of famine.  Plagues of locusts



and other insects have sometimes destroyed entire crops.







     Insecticide chemicals have been used for two primary



purposes-to insure adequate food supplies, and to control



the insect carriers of such diseases as malaria.



Insecticides used to control disease vectors have saved



millions of lives.
Agricultural U*e
     Farmers use insecticides to control insects that cause



damage to agricultural products.  Insects may bite, chew,



sting, or suck plants and animals, retarding growth and
                                   30

-------
reducing quantity and quality of output.  Often they



defoliate plants or damage roots and stems thus causing the



plant to be less productive.  Some insect pests damage the



food or fiber producing portion of the plant,  Others carry



damaging diseases from one plant to another.







     Insecticides are used on livestock to maintain



productivity and quality.  They provide sanitary lots and



barns and help improve milk and meat production by reducing



blood sucking and annoyance from flies, ticks and other



arthropods.









 Urban-Suburban Use
     Insecticides are often used in urban-suburban areas.



They control insect pests in houses, commercial buildings,



parks, reservoirs, and other places where people work, live,



or play.  Many trees along city streets are treated with



insecticides.  Occupants of homes use insecticides to



control insects on ornamental plants, flowers, gardens and



in the home itself.  Many of the lawns which occupy more



than 5 million acres are treated with insecticides.  School



yards, industrial grounds, military reservations,



cemeteries, parks, and golf courses account for another 10



million acres of turf (30).  Much of this also receives
                                 31

-------
insecticide treatment.  Other suburban users of insecticides



include swimming clubs and garden centers,







     A major urban-suburban use of insecticides is to



control structure pests such as termites.  Many new



structures are now treated with organochlorine insecticides



to stop termites and a number of companies offer long-term



termite protection that is based on persistent



organochlorine insecticides.







     Insecticides are also used to control many kinds of



household insects.  Termites, carpenter ants, powder-post



beetles, and other borers attack wooden parts of buildings



and the wood in furniture.  Clothes moths, carpet beetles,



and crickets damage clothing, rugs, and upholstery.  Various



kinds of weevils, beetles, moths, mites, flies, roaches,



ants and other small chewing arthropods infest foods-



Flies, mosquitoes, fleas, lice, mites, and roaches may carry



diseases.







     Scorpions, wasps, and some kinds of ants may inflict



painful and often dangerous stings.  Bed bugs, lice, fleas,



mites, mosquitoes, punkies, sand flies, ticks, and black



spiders may bite or suck blood from people or household



pets.  Some pests may cause no particular damage but are a
                                  32

-------
nuisance—house spiders, millipedes, centipedes, drain



flies, and some kinds of ants,  Some arthropods such as bed



bugs, silverfish, clothes moths, brown dog ticks, some kinds



of roaches, and ants spend their entire lives in homes or



other buildings  (11),
 Industrial Use
     Insecticides are used in industry to protect facilities



against pests that damage structures or make working



unpleasant or dangerous.  These pests include termites,



bees, ants,  spiders, and other similar pests-  Insecticides



prevent contamination of food products with foreign matter.



They are also used to safeguard raw materials and



manufactured products.  For instance, cereal manufacturers



use insecticide-fumigants to protect stored grains.



Manufacturers of products made from wood may use



insecticides to protect the wood against insect damage.



Manufacturers of carpeting treat it with persistent



organochlorine to provide long-term protection against



carpet beetles and other insects that damage animal fibers.







     Among the commercial uses are control of forest



insects.  Two major forest pests on which much effort has



been spent are the gypsy moth and the spruce budworm.
                               33

-------
Insecticides are also used to kill the insect vector of the



dutch elm disease.







     Forest insects and diseases are responsible for losses



in this country each year that far exceed the losses from



forest fires.  Annual forest mortality due to insects and



diseases is estimated at about 2.<4 billion cubic feet.  In



addition, it is estimated that insects and diseases cause an



equal volume of growth loss.







     Forest losses would be about a billion cubic feet



higher if no pest control activities were carried on.  Of



this saving it is estimated that about two-thirds is due to



chemical insecticides and fungicides  (32).







     While thousands of species of insects live in the



forest, only a few cause enough damage to call for control



efforts.  Seven classes of insects attack trees:  bark



beetles., wood borers, leaf eaters, sucking  insects, tip



feeders, gall makers, and seed feeders.  Direct insect



control with chemicals is used when other methods fail  (22).



Table 1 lists some of the common forest insects and  the



principal species of trees affected,




     The increasing need for establishing and growing  timber



will necessitate use of more insecticides and fungicides  to



protect against insects and disease damage.  The trend
                                   34

-------
      Table 1.--Common forest  insects that can be controlled with
                                insecticides
                Name of insect
      Gypsy moth

      Sawflies


      Spruce budworm

      White pine weevi1

      Tent caterpillar


      Scales  and Aphids (also
       Spittle bugs)

      Hemlock looper

      Tussock moth

      White grubs

      Pales weevil
     Principal tree species
            affected
Oaks,  birch,  aspe:i

Eastern and Southern pines and
 tamarack

True firs,  Douglas fir

Eastern White pine, Norway spruce

Broadleaved trees  (especially Northern
 hardwoods  and  aspen)


All trees

Western hemlock

True firs,  Douglas fir

Conifer seedlings

Pine seedlings  .and saplings
        Source:  Essentials of Forestry Practice (22)



toward concentrated production of  a limited number of

species provides conditions conducive to pest development

(32).
                                     35

-------
  Public Health Use




        Insects  transmit  some of  the  major  communicable

   diseases  of the  world  including  malaria,  yellow fever,

   dengue, plague,  and  various  types  of  encephalitis  (19),

   World Health  Organization  (WHO)  authorities  report  that

   insects cause half of  all human  deaths,  sicknesses,  diseases

   and deformities.  There  are  probably  10,000  kinds of mites,

   ticks, and insects that  infect man directly  or  indirectly

   with disease  (17).   Table 2  lists  some human diseases

   transmitted by insects and other arthropods3 in the

   Americas,  and the insect vectors (carriers)  responsible  for

   transmitting  these diseases.



        Insecticides have been  a  major factor in bringing these

   diseases  under control in many countries of  the world.   When

   DDT was first introduced into  India to fight malaria there

   were over 75  million cases a year  with nearly 5 million

   deaths.   Within  10 years of  intensive spraying  the  total

   incidence of  malaria vas down  to less than 5 million cases a

   year and  deaths  had  dropped  to less than 100,000 a  year

   (3U).  In the Soviet Union,  malaria cases dropped from 35

   million in 1946  to 13,000 in 1956,  largely as a result of

   insect spraying.


3/  The most important classes of arthropods are  insectsr arachnids,
and crustaceans.
                                     36

-------
     Table 2.Selected  human diseases transmitted by Arthropods in North,
                         Central,  and South America
               Disease
               Vector
 Chagas disease  3_/

 Cholera I/
 Colorado tick fever
 Conjunctivitis
 Dengue !_/
 Dysentery, Amebic
 Dysentery, Bacillary
 Encephalitis St. Louis, Western,
  Eastern, and Venezuelan
 Leishmaniasis 3/
 Malaria
 Onchoceriasis 3/
 Plague
 Filariasis !_/
 Relapsing fever
 Rickettsialpox
 Rocky Mountain  spotted fever
 Tulareraia
 Typhoid fever 2j
 Typhus, Epidemic !_/
 Typhus, Murine
 Yellow fever 3/
Kissing bugs,  Triatoma and related
 species
Housefly
Hard ticks
Eye gnat
Mosquitoes
Houseily
Housefly

Mosquitoes
Sandflies
Mosquitoes
Black flies
Oriental rat flea and other fleas
Mosquitoes
Soft tick
House mouse  mite
Hard ticks
Deerfly and  Hard ticks
Housefly
Human body louse
Oriental rat flea
Mosquitoes
   I/  Not known in U.S. at present.
   2j  Also  spread oy other more  important carriers.
   3_/  Not in U.S. "out prevalent  in Central and South America.

  Source:   Center for Disease Control  (20)
      Although malaria eradication has been  achieved  in many

parts of the  world  it was estimated  in 1966 that a billion

people lived  in countries where malaria was still a  problem

and  that 65,000 tons of insecticides, mainly DDT, would be

applied in houses during the year  (17) .
                                      37

-------
     A survey of State Public Health officials  throughout



the United States, to which U2 States replied,  indicated



that sliqhtly more than half the States had some  vector-



borne diseases in 1969, 1970, or 1971.*  Many of  these  can



be controlled with insecticides.  The diseases  most



frequently mentioned were Rocky Mountain spotted  fever,



which cannot be effectively controlled with insecticides,



and various types of encephalitis.  Tularemia and plaque



were also mentioned.  A number of malaria cases were



reported but these were brouqht in from other countries,



larqely by veterans returninq from Vietnam.







     The Center for Disease Control of the U.S. Public



Health Service reported that malaria cases in the United



States in 1969 climbed to more than 2,000, larqely because



of infections in GI's returninq from Vietnam.   The potential



for reintroduction of malaria into the United States has



increased because of reduction in the use of DDT  and related



persistent insecticides for mosquito abatement.   This has



resulted in a siqnificant climb in anopheline mosquito



numbers alonq the Gulf and the Atlantic coast as  far north



as New Jersey (3U).







     In areas where personal hyqiene and sanitary facilities



are inadequate,  typhus can be controlled by dustinq people



with insecticides to kill the disease carryinq  lice.  Plaque




4/ Unpublished data U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res.  Serv.
                                38

-------
  can be reduced by better sanitation and by  judicious use  of




  rodenticides and insecticides to  reduce rat and flea



  populations in suspected areas.




       The housefly is one of the  all-time great germ carriers.   Dysen-




  tery, diarrhea, and other digestive troubles  are often  due to con-




  tamination of food by houseflies (17).   Kou?efl:es are  believed to




  have a part  in the spread of pathogens causing cholera, yaws, trachoma,




  typhoid fever and other serious  human diseases.




       Bees, wasps, hornets, and black widow spiders can  be a serious




  health hazard.  The venom from bees and spiders cause painful




  reactions  and may even  be fatal.  Bed bugs, cockroaches, beetles,




  and other insects may  contribute to human discomfort or illness.




       In 1900, public health workers used arsenicals, sulfur,




  petroleum oils  and pyrethrum.  Later such materials as  hydrocyanic



  gas, lead and fluorine  compounds and rotenone were also used (20).





     World War  II  brought the chlorinated hydrocarbons,  DDT




in Switzerland  and BHC in England and France.   After the  War,



chlordane,  toxaphene,  dieldrin, and aldrin became available.




The organophosphate insecticides were introduced  and used in




vector control  in  the  late 1940's.   These included highly toxic




TEPP and parathion.   Later less toxic broad  spectrum organophos-




phate  insecticides such as. malathion, diazinon,  and ronnel were




tested and used by public health workers.(20).

-------
     A very small share of the insecticides used in the United States
are for vector control.  This can be attributed to several factors.
Most of the Nation is in the temperate zone where insect-borne diseases
are less likely to develop and many of the serious vector-borne
diseases have been brought under control through vaccination or other
means.  However, in some tropical nations disease control  constitutes
the nr:..jor use of insect: cic.es.


Other uses
     Amonq  other users of insecticides are Government
agencies, Federal, State, and  local.   They use  pesticides
for plant,  animal, and human disease control.   Larqe
quantities  are used for forests and parklands and  for
special pest problems that  cannot be dealt with effectively
through private efforts.

     Many insects are plain nuisances as well as health or
agricultural problems.  Mosquito control districts
throughout  the nation control  mosquitoes primarily because
of their nuisance characteristics.  Many of  these districts
are organized around a local Government unit such as a
county or city.  In 1970, an estimated $75 to  $100 million
was spent for mosquito control.5  This included the cost of
permanent water control structures as well as  the expense
for insecticide application and materials,
                               40

-------
                      Disease Control
     Many disease  organisms are serious pests in



agricultural and industrial production.  All are discussed



with fungi in pest control literature even though they are



biologically classified as fungi, molds, bacteria, viruses,



or other disease organisms.  Fungus  diseases can be very



destructive particularly in vegetable and fruit production.



Fungi also cause considerable damage to wood products.
Agricultural Use
     Historically, fungi have been serious agricultural



pests.  The Irish famine is blamed on a blight which



destroyed the potato crop, the mainstay of the Irish diet.




     As indicated above, fungicides used in agriculture



include chemicals that control not only fungi but also



bacteria, yeasts, molds, and viral organisms.  Fungi damage



plant leaves, fruits and other parts, and reduce plant vigor



and guality of output.  Fungicides are used most frequently



on fruits and vegetables, usually to control diseases



exhibiting rust, scab, spot, or blight symptons.  Among the
                              41

-------
more serious fungous problems affecting fruit are scab,
cedar rust, quince rust, bacterial spot, fire blight, bitter
rot, brown rot, black rot, peach yellows, cherry leaf spot,
sooty blotch, powdery mildew, blue mold, red stele, and
anthracnose.  Other very serious fungous problems include
"damping-off" of seedlings, fusarium and verticillium wilts,
and rusts of small grains.  Bordeaux mixture was developed
in response to the serious losses suffered by French grape
growers because of downy mildew.  Corn blight in combination
with drought reduced the United States 1970 corn crop
approximately 10 percent, driving prices to recent record
highs.  Without fungicides, commercial tomato production
might not be possible because of damage from early and late
blight.
Urban-Suburban  Use
     Fungicides are freguently used in urban-suburban areas
for controlling diseases of lawn grasses, fruit and
ornamental trees, and shrubs.  Fruit trees grown in backyard
gardens are treated with fungicides to control the same
diseases  that cause crop losses in commercial orchards.
Some ornamental trees, flowers, and shrubs also reguire
fungicide treatment.
                                  42

-------
Industrial  Use
     Fungicides are widely used  in  industrial applications.
Fungicides  made of mercury are put  in  paint to prevent
mildew and  to provide antifouling properties for marine
purposes.   They are also used in pulp  and paper
manufacturing.

     Copper sulfate is used in industrial plants as a
slimicide to prevent slime formation during manufacturing
processes.   It  is also used as an algicide in impounded
municipal water supplies.  One city reportedly uses H
million pounds  annually in its water  (21).

     Wood preservation accounts  for large quantities of
fungicides.   Fungi cause deterioration of telephone and
electric poles, fence posts, railroad  ties/ wooden bridges,
and dock pilings.  These are now treated  with fungicides
that prevent such deterioration.  Many wooden buildings are
treated with chemicals to prevent attacks by destructive
woodrotting fungi.  Wood  preservativesare also sometimes
included in some paint-like products such as redwood deck
stain.  An estimated 600 million cubic feet of wood are treated annually
in the United States.  Assuming that preservatives  make wood last 50
years on the  average, as compared with perhaps 10 years if untreated,
it can be said that wood preservatives conserve  480 million cubic feet
of wood a year (9).
                                43

-------
Other Uses
     Trees are subject to many kinds of diseases, but
relatively few are serious enough to require direct control.
Some of the more destructive tree diseases are white pine
blister rust, chestnut blight, oak wilt, Dutch elm disease,
brown spot needle blight on long leaf pine seedlings, little
leaf disease on shortleaf pine, the heart rots, and dwarf
mistletoe on western conifers  (22).
     Although diseases of forest plants are very
destructive, fungicides are rarely used.  However, some are
used for seed treatment.  Dutch elm disease is important,
but control efforts center on the insect vector,  Large
guantities of fungicides are used to prevent algal growth in
reservoirs, ponds and other aquatic areas.
                        Weed Control
     Weeds present problems.  They compete with crops for
nutrients and moisture, they interfere with the flow of
water and clog channels in irrigation and navigation canals,
                               44

-------
they form safety hazards along highways  and railways, they
provide harborage for insect vectors of disease, and they
cause allergic reactions.  Frequently, weeds can be
effectively controlled by mowing or other mechanical means.
However, herbicides can save many hours of tedious labor and
often provide better weed control at lower costs.  In
addition, herbicides permit certain crop production
practices not otherwise possible.  For example, the "no-
till11 concept of corn production, which depends on the use
of herbicides to control weeds formerly destroyed by
cultivation, has increased yields as much as 12 to 15
percent in some instances (16).
Agricultural Use
     Herbicides are used by farmers to control weeds.  They
are used selectively to destroy unwanted species and
nonselectively to retard growth of all vegetation in an
area.  For instance, farmers used broad spectrum herbicides
to control vegetation in fence rows, irrigation ditches,
along creek banks and roadways.  In contrast, they use
selective herbicides to kill undesirable species of weeds in
such crops as corn, wheat, hay, and pasture,  The selective
herbicides may control pests classified as grasses or
                                 45

-------
broadleaf weeds, annuals or perennials, before or after



emergence from the soil, and before or after the crop is



planted-








     Herbicides are often less expensive substitutes for



cultivation.  They avoid much toilsome labor and enable the



production process to be more completely mechanized.  Some



weeds and brush can be economically controlled only by use



of herbicides.  For example, weeds in broadcast crops such



as small grains cannot be removed by cultivation.  In



pasture and ranqeland, brush cannot always be mowed.










Urban-Suburban Use
     Herbicides are used in residential areas to insure



attractive lawns free of unsightly weeds and unwelcome



species of grass,,  Among the major lawn pests are crabgrass,



dandelion, chickweed, plantain, knotweed, nutsedge,



cjuackgrass, tall fescue, nimblewill, Bermudagrass,



bentgrass, and velvetgrass.  Sometimes even clovers are



unwanted in a lawn and are kept down by herbicides  (30).







     Herbicides are used on other turf areas to control many



of the same weeds that are troublesome in lawns.



Maintaining high quality turf is based on the use of



selective herbicides.
                              46

-------
Industrial Use
     Industry uses herbicides for the same general reasons
as the homeowner—to protect property against weeds and
brush.  Railroads use herbicides on their rights-of-way to
replace or supplement removal of weeds by burning and manual
or mechanical methods.  Utility companies maintain their
riqhts-of-way with herbicides.  Grounds surrounding offices
and factories are made attractive with the aid of selective
herbicides.  Many roadsides have been beautified by planting
shrubbery.  Often these areas cannot be mowed, but weeds may
be controlled with herbicides,  While use of herbicides in
forest pest control is somewhat more frequent than for
insecticides and fungicides still only a small portion of
the forest is treated with herbicides in any given year
(32) .  Much of this is used to control undesirable plant
species and weeds in new plantings.  The herbicides have
also helped to prevent fire by reducing growth of
combustible plant materials on firebreaks and along forest
roads  (8).

     Herbicides make important contributions to safety.  The
application of herbicides along rail lines to control weeds
helps assure safety of railway travel.  The control of brush
along utility lines, railroads, and highways is essential to
good visibility, ease of inspection, and protection of
                              47

-------
wires.  This operation requires a tremendous amount of labor
if done by hand.
Public Health Use
     Poison ivy, poison oak, ragweed, and some other weeds
produce toxins and allergenic pollens.  In the United
States, poison ivy and poison oak cause nearly 2 million
cases of skin poisoning and other skin irritations annually,
for an estimated loss of 333,000 working days (8).  In
addition, these weeds cause 3.7 million days of restricted
activity among those people who are susceptible to the
toxins.  Modern herbicides can keep these allergenic
producing plants under control.

     Herbicides also play an important role in bringing
disease transmitting pests under control.  For example, a
pilot program was planned in Africa to eradicate the tsetse
fly—the vector of sleeping sickness.  Recent findings
indicate that, the best possibilities may lie in integrated
control programs involving the use of herbicides to reduce
growth of the brush essential to the fly's survival;
insecticides to minimize the fly population, and then the
release of sterile male flies to interrupt the reproductive
cycle (8).

                                48

-------
Other Uses
     Government agencies are responsible for controlling
general weed and brush problems particularly in public
areas, such as forests, aguatic sites of various kinds,
institutional surroundings, and recreational areas.

     Weed and brush control in noncropland and public forest
and aguatic areas is very important,  Aguatic areas offer
particularly favorable conditions for weed and brush growth.
Waterweeds clog irrigation and drainage canals, interfere
with navigation, and reduce the numbers and production of
fish and other wildlife.  Improved water flow has been
obtained by the use of certain chemicals on vegetation that
causes flooding.  This also conserves and promotes better
management of water resources  (8).  Aguatic weeds pose
unigue control problems since often the roots, trunk, and
even leaves of. the plant may be protected from the herbicide
by water.

     Recreational areas have been improved by checking
unwanted vegetation.  Managed preserves for wildlife and
fishing areas have been improved by use of vegetation-
control chemicals to produce more favorable sites  (8).

     Herbicides are used along highways to keep them safe
                               49

-------
and attractive.  Mowing is the chief means of highway weed
control, but herbicides reach areas that are inaccessible to
mechanical mowers—around guardrails, abutments, bridges,
signs, and trees or shrubbery.

                    Other Pest Controls
     A mixed lot of other pests lend themselves to control
with pesticide chemicals,  The most common ones in this
category are rodents, particularly rats.  These animals can
be carriers of such dread diseases as plague and may cause
serious damage to stored crops,  In parts of the Orient, it
is estimated that rats destroy a significant share of all
rice and other cereal crops produced (17),  Certain animals
such as skunks, foxes, and wolves transmit rabies.  Birds
can be pests on the basis of three criteria—economic,
health, and nuisance.

     Plant parasitic nematodes occur in all soils.  When
land is brought under intensive cultivation, nematodes often
become a serious problem.
                              50

-------
Agricultural Use
     Rodenticides are used to control rodents which not only
damage growing crops, but also livestock, stored crops and
buildings.  Such rodents include rats, mice, rabbits, and
chipmunks.  Miticides prevent damage to plant foliage from
mites.  Nematocides and soil sterilants are used against
nematodes and other soil pests that attack roots, tubers,
stems, and fruits.  Soil fumigation of California citrus
orchards with  d ichlorobromopropene to control nematodes has
increased the yield of lemons by 22 percent and of oranges
by 33 percent (16).  A 37 percent increase in grapefruit
yields was also observed in Arizona.

     Nematocides are used on crops producing high returns
per acre, such as tobacco, vegetables and fruits.  In North
Carolina, tobacco losses due to nematodes in 1955 were
estimated at $24 million or 6 percent of the value of the
crop.  The 1965 data compiled by the Cotton Disease Council
set the average cotton losses due to nematodes in all cotton
growing States at 1,7 percent.  Sugar beet losses in
California in 1951 were estimated at about 10 percent (50).
     A number of the chemicals classed as pesticides are
                               51

-------
used by farmers not only on pests but to requlate plant



growth and to aid in crop harvesting.







     Defoliants and desiccants are used as harvesting aids,



mainly on cotton, to facilitate mechanical harvesting and



reduce trash residues.  Growth regulators were first used to



control suckers on tobacco, and are now used to control



fruit set, prevent preharvest fruit drop, encourage higher



yields of some crops and produce longer flower stems.



Growth regulators are widely used by producers of



horticultural specialities.







Urban-Subugban Use
     The problems associated with rats, mice and other



vertebrate animals often increase in concentrated living



areas.  Some communities have organized rodent and bird



control programs because of the disease threat they pose and



because of their nuisance characteristics.







     Across the country several thousand persons are bitten



annually by rats, usually helpless infants and defenseless



adults.  Such attacks can be terrifying and can have long



lasting emotional effects.  In addition, rats cause damage



to urban structures and destroy large amounts of food by



consuming or contaminating it.
                             52

-------
     Rodenticides and bird repellants are used extensively
in urban and suburban areas to keep these pest populations
under control,
     Nematocides are used on turf areas, on golf courses,
swimming club grounds, and garden centers,  Lawns, home
gardens, and other small plots can usually be treated at a
relatively small cost  (50).
Public Health Use
     Some vertebrate animals become public health pests when
they transmit disease or otherwise threaten man.  Of all
diseases transmitted to man by animals, rabies is one of the
most frightening.  The movement from urban into rural areas
has placed more people in close association with animals
susceptible to rabies.  These animals include skunks, foxes,
coyotes, and bats.  Rats and mice have been health problems
throughout history.  Rats have been responsible for many
serious plague epidemics.
     Certain field rodents, such as ground sguirrels,
constitute an important reservoir of plague in the Western
United States.  The occurrence of plague epizootics markedly
increases the chance of transmission to man.  In such cases
control is indicated.  Five specific chemicals commonly used
                             53

-------
for this prupose are:  anticoagulants, zinc phosphide,



sodium fluoroacetate, strychnine, and thallium sulfate  (17)









Other Uses
     Pesticide chemicals are important in the management of



wildlife.  For example, fish hatcheries employ some 95



different chemicals, about 50 of which are registered



pesticides  (32).  Chemical products are used to control



trash fish in reservoirs, ponds, irrigation canals, rivers



and other aquatic areas.  They are also used to control such



pests as the sea lamprey in the Great Lakes (8).








     Rodenticides are used in newly seeded forest acres.



Tree debarking chemicals are used extensively on timber to



be harvested for paper manufacturing.










          KINDS AND QUANTITIES OF PESTICIDES USED
     Effective chemical control of pests is of relatively



recent origin.  Early chemical pesticides, which came into



widespread use about 1900, included arsenicals, sulfur,



petroleum oils, and pyrethrunu  DDT was the first of the
                                54

-------
modern array of synthetic organic pesticides.   Its
insecticidal properties were discovered in 1939 and it
attained wide use durinq World War II,  Since then, a large
number of synthetic organic pesticides have nearly replaced
the inorganic materials.

     More than 1,000 basic chemicals are formulated into
about 50,000 registered commercial pesticide products (6).
What follows discusses major kinds of pesticides, their
principal uses, and their major  areas of use.
                 National Use ofPgsticides
     Pesticides are  used  throughout the United States,
Total annual use  in  the United States in recent years is
estimated at between 750  and  800 million pounds.  Farmers
are the major  consumers of  pesticides in the Unites States
and account for slightly  more than half of the domestic use.
Other important users are homeowners, industry, and
Governments,

Agricultural Use
         Expenditures by  farmers  for  pesticides have been rising rapidly in
recent years from  $287 million in  1960 to nearly $900 million in 1970,
                              55

-------
an increase of about  210  percent  (Table 3).  Much of  this increase is

due  to  rapid adoption of  herbicides.
            Table 3.   Farmers'  expenditures for pesticides in  the
                        United States,  1960-70
                     Year
          1960-
          1961-
          1962-
          1964---
          1965---
         1967---
         1968---
         1969---
         1970---
 Expenditures
Million dollars
     287
     436
   1/489
   " 528
   2/561
    786

    899
           If  Farmers'  Pesticide  Expenditures for Crops, Livestock,
         and" Other Selected Uses in  1964, U.S. Dept.  Agr., Econ.  Res.
         Serv., Agr. Econ. Rpt.  145, Oct. 1968.
           2/  Farmers'  Pesticide  Expenditures in 1966, U.S. Dcpt. Agr.,
         Econ.  Res. S-rv., Agr.  Econ. Rpt. 192, Sept. 1970.

           Source:  (28)

      Estimates indicate that farmers used  410 million pounds of

pesticides in 1969  (Table U).  This total  consisted of 200 million

pounds  of insecticides  (including rodenticides, miticides, and

fumiqants),  175 million pounds of herbicides  (including defoliants,

desiccants,  and growth  regulators),  and 35 million  pounds of  fungicides.

Insecticides and  fungicides  were estimated to have  increased only

slightly from 1966  levels,  but herbicide use  in 1969 was apparently

40 percent greater  than in 1966.  These estimates do not include
                                  56

-------
                 TabJr  4.  --Pesticide use by farmers, United States,
                               1966 and estimated 1969
Type of pesticide
T n ^ f* c 1" i t * i rl ^ f {-\ /
HP Th i o i rl ^> Q 7 / _ ..

Tnt a 1

Acres treated
1966
I/
1969
I/
Million acres
45
107
5
i 0/125
50
120
5
10/140
'Percentage
' increase
' 1966-69
Percent
11
12
i/
12
Active ingredients I/
1966 : 1969
4_/ : 5_/
Million jiounds
195 200
125 175
33 35
353 410
• Percentage
increase
: 1966-69
Percent
3
40
6
16
   \J All pesticides other than sulfur  and petroleum.
   2/ Extent of Farm Pesticide Use  on Crops in 1966, U.S.  Bept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv.,
Agr. Econ. Rpt.  147, Oct. 1968.
   _3/ Estimated that acres treated  for  weed control increased from  1966 follows:
Corn,  15 percent; soybeans, 35 percent; wheat, 7 percent; sorghum,  17 percent; and
cotton, 15 percent.  Estimated that  com acres treated for insect  control increase
18 percent from 1966.
   4_/ Quantities of Pesticides Used by  Farmers in 1966, U.S.  Dept.  Agr., Econ. Res.
Serv., Agr. Econ. Rpt.  179, Apr. 1970.
   S/ Assured that farm use was the same proportion of manufacturer's sales of
synthetic organic pesr.ic.idcs as  in 1966.
   £/ Includes insecticides, soil and   space fumigants, miticides,  rodenticides,
and repellents.
   7/ Includes herbicides, defoliants,  dessirants,  and plant  growth regulators.
  ~&/ Includes all pest-, cides used  for  controlling diseases.
   9/ The percentage increase in  acres  was estimated to be about the same as the
ingredients, 6 percent.   Because of rounding the change was  not apparent in the
acres treated.
  10/  The land area  treated is less than  the  sum  of that treated with
 specific types of pesticides  because several  types were used on the  same
acrea.
  Source:   (U.S.  House of Representatives (32)


sulfur or petroleum which are also used in  large quantities  as

pesticides.
                                    57

-------
     In  1966, the  latest year for which detailed farm pesticide

quantity data are  available,  farmers  used 353  million poxmds of

pesticide, 51 percent of all  used in  the United  States  (Table 5) .

This included 27  percent of  the fungicides, 55 percent of  the

herbicides and  57  percent  of  the insecticides  used in the  Nation
                                               !
that year.
         Table 5.--ij.se  
-------
    Farm Products on Which Pesticides are Used—

Of the  353 million pounds of agricultural pesticides used

by farmers in 1966, about 93 percent was  used on growing crops

 (Table  6).  Of the remainder,  'about half was used for treating

livestock.
               Table G-—Farm use of pesticides for different purposes,
                                United  States, 1966
                     Iteir,
        Crops	

        Livestock—

        Other  uses-

          All  uses-
   Active     \  Percentage of all
ingredients  I/  \     ingredients
   Million
   pounds

    328

     12

     13
                                                             Percent-
                      100
          !_/  Does not include sulfur and petroleum.

          Source:  Econ. Res. Serv. (7)



        Cotton and corn  accounted for 26 percent and 22 percent

  respectively—nearly  half of all crop pesticides used  (Table  7).

  All  other crops were  far behind these two.   The next highest  use

  on crops was apples which accounted for  6  percent of all pesticides

  used in 1966.
                                    59

-------
      Table  7.— -Leading crops  in terms of qiumtitic'r, of ail pesticides
                          used, United States,  1966
                   Crop
      Cotton	
      Corn	
      Apples	
      Tobacco	
      Peanuts	
      Vegetables	
      Soybeans	
      V?beat	
      Citrus	
      (All others)-—
        Total	
   Active
ingredients
Percentage: of
    total-
                                         Million
    86
    Y'^
    '19
    17
    16
    16
    1)4
     9
     8
    69
    328
   Percent
     26
     22
      6
      5
      5
      5
      It
      3
      3
     21
    100
        Source:  Econ. Res. Serv. (7)

         The ranking of  crops in terms  of  dollars spent  on them for
pesticides differed condiderably from  the ranking of quantity used
on then.   Corn was
the  leading crop with cotton, soybeems, vegetables, and apples following
in that order (Table 8) -   Corn and soybeans rank hicjher on the expenditure
scale  because of the large quantities  of  herbicides used on these
crops.   On the average,  herbicides cost more per pound  than insecticides
or fungicides.
                                    GO

-------
    Table 7.—Leading crops in terms of quantities of all pesticides
                        used, United States,  1966
                Crop
    Cotton	
    Corn	
    Apples	
    Tobacco	
    Peanuts	
    Vegetables—
    Soybeans	
    Wheat	
    Citrus	
    (All others)-
     Total	
   Active
ingredients
Percentage of
    total
                                      Million
                                      pounds
    19
    17
    16
    16
    Ik
     9
     8
    69
   328
  Percent
     26
     22
      6
      5
      5
      5
      k
      3
      3
     21
    100
     Source:   Econ. Res. Serv.  (7)
     Types of Pesticides Used on Cropjs—Besides being the major
users of fungicides,  herbicides, and insecticides,  farmers
also use other  pesticides such as nematocides,  fumigants, miticides,
defoliants and  desiccants, growth regulators,  and rodenticides.  Less
than a dozen products accounted for more  than half of all pesticides
used by farmers in 1966.  In terms of quantities of material,
insecticides formed the leading crop pesticide group in 1966 with
138 million  pounds, or 42 percent of all  pesticides  (Table 9).  But
herbicide use increased rapidly from 76 million pounds in 1964 to
112 million  pounds in 1966 and by 1966 the amount spent for
herbicides for  crop use exceeded that spent for insecticides, viz.,
$243 million as compared with $195 million (Table 10).
                          61

-------
 Table  9.—Quantities  of  pesticides  used  on  crops  by  type  of  pesticide,
                          United  States,  L966
Tvpe of
pesticide







Active
ingredients
Million
138
112
30
30
18
328
' Percentage of
total
Percent^
9
9
6
100
  Source:   Econ.  Res.  Serv.  (7)

Table _LQ •—Expend.' tores for pesticides used on crops by type of pesticide,
                          United States, 1966
Type of
pe ;;!icide




Defoliants and de sice ants 	 	
Soil fum. itr ant s— 	 • 	 — -.——.-



Expenditures
MilJ ion
dollars
21*3
195
33
12
f,
5
12
506
Percentage of
total
Percent
1(8
39
7
2
1
1
2
100
  Source:  Econ. Res. Serv.  (2)
                                   62

-------
     Cotton and corn were the leading crops for insecticide use in



1966.  Cotton accounted for 65 million pounds or U7 percent of all



crop insecticides.  The relative importance of cotton was even greater



in 196U when it accounted for about  55 percent of all crop insecticides.



     The more important insecticide  products used on farm crops in 1966



were:  toxaphene,  31 trillion pounds; DDT,  26 million pounds; aldrin,



15 million pounds; and carbaryl, 12  million pounds.  These U products



accounted for about 60 percent of all insecticides used by farmers in



1966.  In terms of land area treated, the  leading insecticides was



aldrin which was  used on 13.8 million acres.  This compares with only



5.U  million acres  for toxaphene. (see appendix tables 1 and 2)








     A 1970 survey of agricultural specialists indicated that leading



insecticides used  on cotton that year were methyl parathion and



toxaphene; on corn the leading products  in 1970 were Bux-, aldrin,



and  phorate; for  apples, guthion and parathion.  DDT was not



listed among the  leading insecticides used on any major crop in 1970,  The



1970 use differed  from 1966, when DDT was  the second place cotton



insecticide and Bux  and phorate were not  yet listed as corn



insecticides.







     A total of some 46 million pounds or  41 percent of all herbicides was user



on corn  in  1966.  No other  crop approached  this




quantity.  During  1966 pasture and rangeland and soybeans each accounted  for  9




percent of the herbicides.
                                63

-------
     The two leading  herbicides  used on  farm  crops  in  1966  were



 2,1-D  (10 million pounds)  and atrazine  (24  million  pounds).   These



 two accounted  for about  55  percent of herbicide materials used by



 farmers.  In 1966,  specialists estimated that herbicide  rankings  for



 individual  crops in 1970 were generally  similar to  1966, although levels



 of use were higher.







     Fungicides are used chiefly on fruits, vegetables,  an  on certain



 field crops, such as  peanuts.  In 1966,  apples accounted for



 8.5 million pounds  of fungicides, 28 percent  of all those used by



 farmers.  The  leading fungicides in 1966 were zineb, captan,  and



 maneb.







     Miscellaneous  pesticides include such  long established ones  as



 rodenticides and fumigants, and  some newer  ones.  Plant  hormones,



 for example, are currently  used  for tobacco sucker control  and for



 fruit setting  and thinning  purposes.  Defoliants



 and desiccants are  major items used as harvest aids particularly  in  cotton



 production.







     In 1966,  cotton  took a major share  of  the miscellaneous  pesticides



 accounting  for 1*» million pounds, or 30  percent, of all the



 miscellaneous  pesticides used on crops by farmers in the United



 States,







     Leading pesticide products  in the miscellaneous category



included    the fumigants—D-D mixture (li», 0 million pounds) and
                                64

-------
sulfur dioxide  (8.3 million pounds); the defoliants DEP and Polex
(4.2 million pounds),  and the growth regulator maleic hydrazide
(3.1 million pounds).   ln terins of land area treated, the leading
products were DEF and  Polex.

       Pesticide Use on Livestock--Farmers  spent about
  $30 million for about 12.5  million pounds of livestock pesticides in 1966.
  Pesticides used on livestock  were  mostly  insecticides—10.8  million
  pounds (Table 11).   Beef  cattle  accounted for the major share of  the
  6.2 million pounds or 57  percent of  all livestock insecticides and
      Table 11.—Insecticides used on selected kinds of livestock, United States,
                                    1966
Kind of
livestock








Active
ingredients
Million pounds
& ?

-------
  Table 12.—Leading insecticides used on livestock, United States, 1966
Insecticide







•y
Active
ingredients
Million pounds
•3 7
->• 1
1 5
q
1
h 0
10 8

: Percentage of
: total
Percent
3h
lU
8
7
07
100

    Source:  Econ.  Res. Serv. (7)
Urban-Suburban Use
     Pesticides are  usually used in households in small



containers and often in  aerosol cans.  Most of the 100



million pressurized  aerosol containers of insect spray



produced in 1969  were probably used by homeowners  (9).



Sales of household insecticides and repellents rose  from $86



million at manufacturers prices in 1958 to $130 million  in



1967 (Table 13).  Estimates for 1968 indicate $150 million.
                               66

-------
      Pesticide  preparations for household,  lawn and garden

 pest control had a total retail value  of  $200 million in

 1965.  This increased to $298 million  by  1970 and is

 expected to reach $
-------
               Table 1)4.----Estimated extent  and cost  of chemical
                    weed control on lawns and turf,  United
                      States, 1959, 1962, 1965, and  1968
                  Year
 Acres
treated
                               Million
                                acres

                                 0.1
                                 1.1
  Cost of
 herbicide
    and
applications


  Million
  dollars
                  1.5

                  5.^

                  6.8

                   .7
              Source:   (30) and unpublished data U.S. Dept. Agr. ,
                       Agr. Res. Serv., Econ.  Res. Serv. ,  and
                       Fed. Exten. Serv.
  Industrial Use
       The value of pesticides used by industrial firms,

  institutions, and governments rose from  about $110 million

  in  1965 to an estimated  $300 million in  1970,  Spending  for

  pesticides by these  units is expected  to exceed $400 million

  by 1975.7
       Pesticides control  pests in and around plant and

 warehouse sites, and  also enter manufacturing process  as

 inputs,   Copper sulfate  is an important  industrial fungicide

 and  is widely used as a  slimicide and  algicide,  More  than

 50 million pounds were used for industrial purposes in  1969.
7/ 3bid.
                                    68

-------
     In 1969 about 721,000 pounds of mercury were used
in paint to provide protection against mildew.  Another
19,000 pounds went into marine paint to provide antifouling
protection and 42,000 pounds into paper and pulp
manufacturing  (9).

     An estimated total of 600 million cubic feet of wood
are treated annually for disease control in the United
States.  The major pesticides used by industrial firms to
treat lumber and fencing materials for rot prevention are
creosote and pentachlorophenol  (9).

     Pest control in structures is an important and growing
business.  The pest control or exterminating industry treats
insects and animal pests that may be destructive to real
estate and other property, stored food, or detrimental to
health, comfort, and well being.  Major pests include
termites, rats, mice and cockroaches, fleas, ticks, wasps,
pantry pests,  birds—and such animals as skunks and bats
 (32).  A substantial number of  firms provide services to
control such pests.  Some data  about these firms are shown
below  (26).
                               69

-------
Item                              1963                   1967

Number of pest control and
  exterminating firms                  3,255               3,495
Gross receipts of these firms   $219,214,000        $296,580,000
Payroll per year                  94,428,000         130,673,000
Number of paid employees              20,329              24,014

Most of these firms use organochlorine insecticides to
provide low cost, long lasting termite protection.

     Chlordane is a principal insecticide for
termite control.  Its persistence permits continuous
protection with infrequent treatment.  No estimates are
available of the amounts of chlordane employed for treating
structures, but it is believed that quantities used for nonfarm
purposes, including structures, substantially exceed agricultural
use which was 526,000 pounds in 1966.

     Railroads, electrical utilities, telephone, gas transmission
companies, and other utiliites are large users of herbicides for
maintaining brush-free rights-of-way.  It is estimated that, in
1969, utility companies treated  about 6 million acres with either
2,4-D or 2,4,5-T.  They also used substantial quantities of other
herbicides, both inorganic and organic.

     Industry spokesman estimate that private use of herbicides
on forests is about four times as great as  Government
use  (32).   Estimated herbicide costs for treated

                          70

-------
   forest plantings were about  $6.2  million in 1968  (Table  15).
   Table 15.—Estimated cost  and extent of chemical weed control, selected uses.
                   United States, 1959, 1962, 1965, and 1968
Type or area

Forest plantings —


Acres treated
1959 ; 1962
— — Mi* 111 nn

2.0 3.6
	 0
. -J
2.0 3-9
; 1965


3.3
.1
.1
3.5
: 1968

1.6
.5
.2
2.3
Cost of herbicide and
° applications
1 1959 ! 1962


19.7 83.7
2.8
19.7 86.5
: 1965


68.5
1.5
1.9
71-9
; 1968

26.8
6.2
k.h
37. U
Source:  (30)  and unpublished data U.S. Dept.  Agr., Agr. Res.  Serv. ,  Econ. Res. Serv. ,
        and Fed. Exten. Serv.

        A  survey by Dr. Norman Johnson  of the Weyerhaeuser

   Company reported that of 28 million  acres managed by U3

   industrial owners in the south,  only 186,000 acres were

   treated with herbicides in 1969.   This is only 0.7 percent

   of the  acreage surveyed (32).



        Estimates for 1968 show  that over 450,000 acres of

   forest  plantings (including commercial plantings) were

   treated with pesticides at a  cost of over $6 million.   This

   cost included the materials and  their application.
                                      71

-------
fublj.c  Health .use
      Health officials  have relied on a  variety of techniques
for controlinq disease vectors.  Chemical  disease vector
controls are largely of recent origin.   However, only a
small share of the pesticides used in the  United States are
devoted to disease control.
     In 1971, a large area of Texas and parts of Louisiana and Mexico
were sprayed with malathion to check the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitic
(VEE)  epidemic (about 8.4  million acres as indicated by requests  received
from January 1 through August by the Federal Working Group on Pest Management,
Subcommittee on Pesticides, President's Cabinet Committee on the  Environment).
This disease occurs  in horses and people but the horses are much more
susceptible.  At a rate of 3 ounces per acre the area treated for this
epidemic required about 1.5 million pounds.

      A survey of U2 public health offices  in  the United
States showed that many States do have  vector disease
programs and use pesticides for disease vector control.8
Slightly less than half of the States reported the use of
pesticides for specific disease control efforts, but nearly
all States had spray programs to control mosquitoes for
nuisance as well as health reasons.  Quantity data for these
programs are not available,  but the insecticide most
frequently used in the mosquito or other vector spray
program was malathion.   Abate, Fenthion, and  naled were also
8/ Unpublished data U.fi.  Dept. Ags., Econ. Res. Serv.
                                   72

-------
frequently mentioned.   A few states, reporting en
quantitites,  indicated that rates were generally only a few
ounces  per acre,  much of it applied in ultra low volume
 (OLV) formulations.   Both air and ground equipment were used
in  applying the mosquito or other vector control materials.

      About 2 percent of the insecticides sold in California
 in  1970 were used for vector control («).  other estimates
 indicate that $75 to $100 million is spent annually in the
 United  States on organized mosquito control  programs.
 Special large-scale applications for control of major
 vector-borne diseases in the United States are used when
 threats develop.
 Other Uses
      Government agencies at the Federal, State,  and local
 level are also important pesticide users.  They use
 pesticides in and around their facilities and on public
 lands for all kinds of purposes.  In addition they have
 major responsibility for controlling disease vectors and
 frequently for other area-wide pest problems.
      Use by. !§3§.ral Government Agencies9—Most Federal
9/ Unpublished data^Presidents Cabinet Committee on the Environment,
                              73

-------
agencies request review of specific pesticide use projects



from the President's cabinet committee on the Environment—



working Group on pesticides.



     In the first 8 months of 1971, the Committee received



over 3,000 individual pesticide use requests frcm more  than



a dozen different Federal gencies.  These requests were for



the use of pesticides on over 2', million acres of land.



This is equivalent to about a sixth of the acreage treated



by farmers in 1966.  However, the average rate cf pesticide



use by farmers is probably much higher than that by



government agencies.  For example, the malathion used by



USDA in the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (VEE) Program  was



applied in ULV formulations at the rate of about. 3 ounces



per acre.







     The 1971 acreage of land treated with pesticides under



Federal programs was unusually high because of the VEE



epidemic.  This program covered 8. U million of the 21



million acres of land treated in all government programs.



The fire ant program in 9 Southern States accounted for 6



million acres.




     The major Federal agencies submitting pesticide use



projects for review were the Department of Agriculture,



Interior,  and Defense,   The Department of Agriculture



requests involved 16,7 million acres or about 80 percent  of



the total  Federal use.   It was responsible for carrying out
                                74

-------
both the VEE and the fire ant programs.







     Also included under USDA were the gypsy moth and other



pest control programs of the Forest Service.  The Department



of Interior was second with 2.7 million acres and the



Department of Defense third with 1.2 million acres.







     The leading chemical involved, malathion, was



sprayed in ULV form on nearly all of the acreage in the VEE



program,  A small amount of naled was also used.  Malathion



was also used extensively for other Federal insect control



programs.  Mirex for the fire ant program was the second



ranking material in terms of acres involved.  Its use was



requested on 6.0 million acres.  More than 600,000 Federal



acres were treated with 2,4-D for weeds ranging from



marijuana plants in the Midwest to sage brush in the Rocky



Mountains.







     Other insecticides requested for use on substantial



acreages included carbaryl—over 500,000 acres and naled—



over 300,000,  Zectran is another that is gaining favor as



an insecticide with the Forest Service.







     In fiscal year 1969, the Forest Service sprayed 268,068



acres for the control of noxious weeds or woody vegetation.



This included about 83,000 acres treated with 2,4,5-T either



alone or in a mixture with 2,U-D.  There currently are no
                              75

-------
effective alternatives to 2,4,5-T to control certain species
of undesirable woody vegetation, such as mesquite-
       In Forest  Service sponsored programs, the
insecticide-fumigant, ethylene dibromide, is the most common
pesticide used.  In 1970, about 310,000 pounds of
insecticides and fumigants were used for forest insect
control.  By far the largest item was ethylene dibromide,
235,000 pounds,  Fenitrothion and carbaryl followed with
51,000 pounds and 1U,000 pounds respectively.  In the first
quarter of 1971, the Forest Service requested the use of
insecticide products on more than 700,000 acres of forest
land.  Of this, 375,000 acres was intended for gypsy moth
control with carbaryl.  Malathion is also frequently used.
Use of DDT has been terminated, but Zectran is being tested
as a replacement for budworm control.
     Use by Other Government Agencies--The major herbicide
chemical used by highway departments are 2,U-D and 2,4,5-T,
However, the use of 2,4,5-T has been reduced considerably.

     Other chemicals sometimes used in highway rights-of-way
weed control include simazine and dalapon.  Growth
retardants on highway weeds are not much used because they
are expensive and not very effective.
                                 76

-------
                   Regional Use of Pesticides
     Cropping patterns  and  climatic conditions greatly

affect the need for  pesticides.   The warm moist areas of the

South are very favorable  to pest growth.  Pesticides are

used in all regions,  but  most heavily in the Central,

Southern, and Pacific regions.


     The Corn Belt used more pesticides on farms in 1966

than any other farm  production  region in the United States.

It accounted for  68  million of  the 353 million pounds of

pesticides used by farmers, or  nearly 20 percent of the

total.  The Southeast region came next with 59 million

pounds  (table 16).   The Mountain region used only 16 million

pounds or less than  5 percent of the United States farm

total.

     Herbicides were  used most  extensively in the Corn Belt,

35 million pounds or  32 percent of all those used on farms

in the United States.   The  Northern Plains and Corn Belt

regions used the  largest  share  of 2,U-D.  Atrazine was also

most used in the  Corn Belt  with 10.0 million pounds or U2.5

percent of the United States total.  The Delta States were

leading users of  trifluralin.
      10/  The United States is  divided into 10 production regions  in the
    following discussion.  The States included in each region are(Shown
    in the map on figure 1.
                               77

-------
                  Table j_g.—Farm pesticide use, by farm production region. United States, 1966 I/
Regi on


Pn-rn "RfO t 	 	 	

CO

Ttol+Q _ ________ — —






Fungicides

6.8
3.U
5-1*
.8
3.3
5.2
.6
1.8
.k
2.8
30.5

: Herbicides

6.2
11.6
35.*
lit. 9
5.2
5.0
6.1
7.5
6.3
1U.1
112. It
Crops
: Insecticides


7-0
U.5
21.5
U.5
10.8
35. U
21.8
16.0
7.0
9-1
137-6

: Other :
pounds active
0.7
.6
.7
.1
11.1
11.2
1.6
2.2
.8
18.7
1+7-7
:
Crops
t ot al


20.7
20.2
63.1
20.3
30. It
56.7
30.1
27-5
lit. 3
U it. 8
328.1
Livestock '

1.1*
.9
3.3
1.5
.7
1.1
• 7
1.3
1.1
.5
12.5
Other

0.9
_2
1.3
1.3
6.2
1.6
.2
.2
• 5
.2
12.6
: Total all
: uses

22.9
21.3
67-7
23.1
37-1+
' 59-it
31.0
29.0
15-9
^5.5
353.2
I/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.




Source:  Econ. Res. Serv.  (6)

-------
  It. S. DEPARTMENT OF ACRICULTUli E
                                          NEC. ERS 1399-62 (B> ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE
                              Figure  /

     Farmers  in  the Southeast region were the major users of
insecticides.  About 35 million pounds or 26 percent of  all
farm insecticides used in the United States were applied in
this region.  The southeast region was the primary target
for both toxaphene and DDT, accounting for 4U and 42
percent, respectively, of total United States use of these
two chemicals.   The Delta States region ranked second in the
use of both toxaphene and DDT,
     Nearly all  of the aldrin, 88 percent, was applied in
the Corn Belt.   The southern Plains and Pacific regions  were
important for parathion, while the South generally used  most
of the methyl parathion.
                              79

-------
     Fungicide use was concentrated in the Northeast, Corn
Belt, and Southeast regions.  Zineb was used primarily in
the Corn Belt; captan in the Northeast, Appalachian and the
Lake States regions.  Copper fungicides were used most
heavily in the Southeast.
                  Pesticide Use by States
     Until recent years, little information was available on
pesticide use by States.  But growing concern over the use
of these products in the last few years caused several
States to begin gathering some detailed information,
particularly for agricultural uses.
Agricultural Use
     Farm pesticide expenditures are estimated annually for
States by the United States Department of Agriculture.
Preliminary estimates of combined State data places farmers
pesticide purchases for 1970 at nearly $900 million.  These
data are based on benchmarks and are updated annually on the
basis of information from pesticide manufacturers and other
sources.
                             80

-------
     California was the leading State in the  1970 use of
pesticides with an expenditure of $115 million, about 13
percent of the national total.  Other important States, but
considerably behind California were:  Florida with $58
million, Texas with $56 million, and Illinois and Iowa each
with $UO million.  States that spent less than $2 million on
pesticides in 1970 were Vermont, Rhode Island and Nevada.

     The distribution of pesticide  purchases  by farmers has
shifted since 1955.  But California was first, Florida was
second and Texas was  third in both 1955 and  1970.
California had a slightly smaller share of the total in 1970
than in 1955.  In 1955 North Carolina and Mississippi ranked
fourth and fifth.  In 1970 Iowa and Illinois  ranked fourth
and fifth and they were 21st  and 24th  in 1955.  The
proportion of the Nation's expenditures for pesticides has
decreased in the South and East and increased in the
Midwest.  This shift is largely due to a decrease in cotton
acreage in the Southeast and a large increase in the use of
weed and insect control chemicals on field crops in the
Midwest.

     Information for the 5 Lake States (Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) indicates that farmers
there treated 36 million acres in 1970,  Nearly all of the
treated acres were corn and soybeans, 21 million acres and
10 million acres, respectively.  Small grains accounted for
                               81

-------
4 million acres and other crops for about 1 million acres.
In terms of area covered including multiple applications,
pesticides were used on 50 million acres in 1970.  Of this,
     /
38 million acres were treated for weeds, 11 million acres
for insects and 1 million for diseases.

     Important herbicides used on corn in the 5 Lake States
in 1970 were atrazine (17,3 million acres), 2,4-D  (4.5
million acres), propachlor (4,0 million acres), and atrazine
with oil  (2.5 million acres).  Leading herbicides used on
soybeans were amiben (4.6 million acres), trifluralin (1.6
million acres), and arachlor (1.1 million acres).  For small
grain the leading herbicides were 2, 4-D (1.9 million acres)
and MCPA  (1.5 million acres).

     Insecticides most used in 1970 on corn were aldrin  (4.7
million acres), phorate (1.5 million acres), Bux-Ten (1.4
million acres) and heptachlor (1.00 million acres).  Only
small amounts of insecticides were used on small grains and
hay in the 5 Lake States,   These included carbaryl and
ma lathion.  Diazinon and methoxychlor were used on hay.

     Census of Agriculture data for 1969 were available for
only 13 States, mostly in the Central and Northeast sections
of the country when this report was being prepared.  In
increased markedly from 1964 to 1969.  The use of insecticides
increased from 3.0 million acres in 1964 to 16.4 million in 1969,
                               82

-------
 the use of  herbicides  from  38.6  million  acres  to  49-7
 million  (25),

       Biqqest gains  for insecticides  were in  Illinois and
 Iowa.  These two  States rose  from  0.2  million  acres treated
 with  insecticides in 1964 to  8.6 million acres in 1969.
 Insecticide use actually declined  from 1964  to 1969 in
 Pennsylvania and  New Jersey.
       Herbicide use  increased  the most  in  Illinois, from 5.5
 million acres in  1964  to 9.3  million in  1969.   Pennsylvania
 showed a  slight drop in weed  treated acreage from 1964 to
 1969.
 Urban-Suburban Use
      About 2 million acres of lawns and about 1.7 million
 acres of other turf areas received herbicide treatment in
 1968 at an average cost of about $30 per acre.* *  Over 75
 percent of the herbicides used on other turf areas were
 applied on golf courses, race tracks, stadiums and the like.

      The State of California has compiled pesticide data for
 residential use in 1970 based on sales permits or licenses.
 The data are not complete because certain pesticides used on
 an infrequent basis and in small quantities require no
  ll/ Unpublished data U.S. Dppt. Agr., Agr. Res. Sery., Econ. Res,
Serv., and Fed. Exten. Serv. and (30).
                                 83

-------
permit or licensed applicator.  Nevertheless, they show that at least
 2.2 million pounds of herbicides were used and  411,000 pounds of
insecticides.
Industrial  Use
     The data collected  in  1970  by the State of California
indicate       chlordane was  the most frequently used
pesticide for pest control  in structures,  accounting for
550,000 pounds or 56  percent  of  all such pesticide use.
Methyl bromide was second with about a third as much as
chlordane.  Almost 1  million  pounds of pesticides were used
for control of pests  in  structures in California during
1970.


       METHOD, FORMULATION, AND  SEASON OF APPLICATION
     Pesticides come in many  different formulations,  both dry
and liquid, and are applied with a  number of kinds of ground
and air application devices.   Timing depends on the use, but
an appreciable share of pesticides  is applied during the
summer months.
                                 84

-------
                      Agricultural Use
Application of Pesticides
     Agricultural pesticides are most commonly applied with
either ground or aerial equipment.  Ground equipment is
usually used when farmers apply their own pesticides and
when application is made in the early growth stages.  Air
equipment is more likely to be used for broadcast crops, for
row crops in the later  stages of growth, and for fields and
areas that are difficult to cover with ground equipment.

     Some indication of the type of equipment used can be
gained by determining how much pesticides farmers apply
themselves and how much is custom applied.  Nearly all
farmers use ground equipment when applying the material
themselves.  However, much of the custom-applied materials
is put on with air equipment,

     A 1964 study indicates that about a fourth of the
farmers' pesticides were applied by custom operators (15).
Custom treatment of crops ranged from 5 percent for apples
and summer fallow to 80 percent- for grains other than wheat.

     A series of weed control studies indicates that custom
                             85

-------
application of  herbicides rose slightly from 1959 to 1968.

Custom weed treated acreage increased  from 26.6 percent  to

31.<4 percent of the total during this  period.»* Of the

custom applied  pesticide materials  used by farmers in 1964,

30 percent was  applied with ground  equipment and 70 percent

with air equipment.

     If ground  equipment is used for nearly all farmer

applied material,  than about 20 percent of all farm

pesticides in  196U was applied with air equipment and 80

percent with ground equipment.  This compares with 22

percent applied with air equipment  in  1958 (table 17).




 Pesticide Formulations

      Pesticides can be applied either as liquids or dry

 materials.  Liquid sprays are preferred because they are

 less bulky and easier to handle and apply than dusts.  They

         Table  17.—Application of farm  pesticides, by persons making
                the application and by type, of equipment used.
                        United States, 1958 and

Year


1958 I/ 	
196i* 2/ 	
Percentage
Custom
operator


27
27
app] led by:
\ Farm
| operator


73
73
\ Percentage
\ Ground
' equipment


78
80
applied with :
' Air
| equipment


22
20
         I/  Percentage of acres treated.
         2/  Percentage of farmers' expenditures for pesticides

         Source: Econ. Res.  Serv. (15),  (23)

 '12/ ibid.

-------
also adhere to plant and animal surfaces better than dry



materials, and spray application equipment is more



generally available than dustinq equipment.  However,



granular pesticide materials are also widely used.







     Pesticides to be applied as liquids are initially



formulated as water soluble emulsifiable concentrates or as



wettable powders.  Many of the insecticides are formulated



as emulsifiable concentrates, while  some of the important



herbicides are formulated as wettable powders.  However, the



phenoxy herbicides are usually formulated as water soluble



emulsifiable concentrates.  Emulsifiable concentrates are



made by mixing the technical pesticide materials with



solvents, emulsifiers, and wetting agents.  They are most



often packaged in concentrations ranging from less than one



pound to 9 or 10 pounds of active material per gallon.



     Some liquids are initially formulated as wettable



powders.  These materials are made by mixing technical



pesticide materials with diluents.   Emulsifiers, wetting



agents, and spreader-sticker compounds may be added.  The



farmer, or other user, dilutes the concentrated formulations



to field strength with water, before using.  Petroleum is



sometimes used as the diluent rather than water.







     Among the materials applied by  farmers in dry form are



dusts and granules.  Dusts have become less attractive to



farmers in recent years because they are likely to be
                                 87

-------
unpleasant to handle and are subject to drift.  Granules



have gained in popularity because they are convenient to



handle.  Some pesticides are mixed with dry fertilizer



before sale to the farmer.  They are applied as part of the



fertilizer spreading operations.







     In both 1964 and 1966, liquid formulations made up



about 75 percent of all pesticide expenditures by farmers



(2) - Liquids accounted for 95 percent or more of the treated



acreage of wheat, rice, other small grains, sugar beets,



alfalfa and other hay, pasture and rangeland,  citrus, apples,



and other deciduous fruit.  Dusts dropped from 14 percent



to 5 percent while granules rose from 9 percent to 17 percent.
     The type of formulations used varied considerably by



crops.  Sprays were the only formulation of any consequence



used on grains, citrus, summer fallow, pasture rangeland and



apples.  However, only 53 percent of the peanuts, 57 percent



of the soybeans and 58 percent of the corn was treated with



spray materials in 1966.  Granules were important in corn



and soybeans, with 38 percent and HQ percent of the total



formulations, respectively.  Dusts were important only for



peanuts, where they accounted for 36 percent of the



pesticides used.







     There was considerable variation among the 5 Lake
                                 88

-------
    States in the proportions of pesticides broadcast or applied in a band.
    In general, herbicides were more likely to be broadcast while insecticides
    were more likely  to be banded.  For example, in Illinois 56 percent of the
    herbicides were broadcast and  68 percent of the insecticides were banded.
    In Minnesota, 64  percent of the herbicides were broadcast and 82 percent
    of the  insecticides were banded.  When broadcast, herbicides were
    more  likely to  be surface applied than to be incorporated into the
    soil.   Insecticides seemed to  be about equally divided between surface
    application and incorporation  into the soil (table 18).
    Table  I'j	Percentage of acres treated with herbicides and insecticides,  by
                 method of application.  5 Lake States,  1969 and 19TO  3_/
te and Year
Herbicides
Apn.'i -d by
Self
Custom
operator
Mi
B
Surface
applied

tiiod of Application
roadc.ist
Incorporated
in soil
Band
Insecticides
Applied by
	 .
Custom
&elt operator
Method of Application
Broadcast
Surface Incoiporated
applied j in soil
«,,:
                                                  Percent
Illinois 11 . . .

Indiana I/. . .
Michigan 2/. .
Minnesota. . .

Wisconsin . . .

Total . . .
1969
1970
1969
1970
1969
1970
1969
1970
1969
1970
1969
1970
84
84
K9
86
68
90
81
S3
67
73
83
3-1
16
16
1 1
14
1 2
10
19
17
33
27
17
16
19
33
44
•1V
79
75
56
59
90
91
XX
XX
20
18
12
13
4
12
6
S
4
4
XX
XX
6)
44
4-1
40
17
13
33
36
6
5
XX
XX
95
95
95
93
79
SO
94
98
£9
9-1
94
94
5
5
S
7
21
20
6
2
11
6
6
6
11
10
22
21
bO
S6
12
8
29
20
XX
XX
21
21
33
2?
S
4
3
10
14
16
XX
XX
68
69
•45
52
ts
10
SO
R2
57
64
XX
. XX
I/Corn, soylxr-jr.s, oat. wheat, barley, rye and hay in all states, also iirv benns in Mi<:Iiir..i;i. fliuticeil in Minnesota, and tc.li.icco in Wisconsin. Percent
seres treated for applicator anJ percent of reports for method of application. 2/19n9 data tor hcrlucidi-s includes only corn a:id soybeans.

Source: Wise.  Dept.  of Agri.  (35)
                                                                                       of
      Aerial  Application of  Pesticides
           There are about 2,200 agricultural  pesticide aviation
     operations with 6,100 aircraft in the United  States.
     Aircraft  spread about 10.U million  acres with  seeds  and
     agricultural chemicals annually  (about 80 percent of this  is
     for  pest  control).   About  90  percent of  the aircraft are
     fixed-wing airolanes and 10 percent are  helicopters  (33) ,
                                          89

-------
     The aircraft are operated by about 1,300 commercial and



900 private firms.  The private firms  (mostly farmers)



qenerally own only one plane and fly much less than



commercial applicators.  Farmers probably apply less  than  5



percent of the aerially applied pesticides,








Seasonality of Pesticide Use



     Some indication of the seasonality of weed treatment



can be obtained from the proportion of acres treated



preemerqence and postemergence with herbicides,



Preemergence treatments are applied early in the season



before the crop emerges.  However, even postemergence



treatments are qenerally applied in the early stages of



growth when the crop has most difficulty competing with



weeds.







     Studies by the USDA indicate that an increasing share



of the herbicide chemicals are being applied preemergence or



earlier in the season (30).  The proportion of herbicide



treated acres in which preemergence treatments were used



increased from 7 percent in 1959 to 43 percent in 1968



(table 19).  Major factors in this shift were corn and



soybeans.  Corn treated preemergence increased from 11



percent of the treated corn acreage in 1959 to 51 percent  in



1968.  Cotton and soybeans contributed to the overall shift



to preemergence treatments by the large increase in the



acreage of these crops treated for weed control although the
                               90

-------
  proportion treated  preemergence  remained relatively
  constant.   Cotton acreage treated increased from 1.5 million
  acres in  1959 to 9.2  million acres in 1968 and  soybean
  acreage increased from 0.5 million acres in 1959 to 22.3
  million acres in 1968,
         Table  19.—Acreage treated with.weed control chemicals, by time
             of application, United States,  1959, 1962, 1965, and 1968
                      Acres treated I/
                                            Percentage of acres treated:
                                          Preemergence
                Postemergence
                       Million acres
                            71
Percent
                                              30
                                              1+3
Percent

  78
  70
  \J  Sum of acres treated preemergence and postemergence.  The land area treated
is overstated because some acres received both preemergence and postemergence
treatments.
  Source:  (30) and unpublished data U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. Res. Serv. ,  Econ. Res.
          Serv., and Fed. Exten. Serv.
       Some  important crops on which  preemergence treatments
  with herbicides accounted for more  than half of the  weed
  treatments in 1968 included corn, cotton,  soybeans,  peanuts,
  sugar beets,  and fruits  and vegetables.  Important
  postemergence crops were sorghum, wheat, rice, other small
  grains, and pasture and  rangeland.
                                    91

-------
                     Urban-Suburban Use
     Some herbicides used by homeowners are applied during



the dormant or near dormant season.  But the phenoxy



herbicides, the primary herbicides used on lawns and turf,



work best when the plant is actively growing-  Some



insecticides, including horticultural oils, are applied



during dormancy or early spring, but most insecticides are



used when the insects appear as adults during the growing



season.  Fungicides are usually applied in the late spring,



summer or early autumn,







     Golf courses and many other businesses having turf,



experience seasonal variation in demand for their



facilities.  Golf courses are used more frequently in the



warm months, football fields in the fall, baseball diamonds



in the spring.  Municipal parks are most used in the summer.







      In California, the only State for which such data are



available, nearly 64 percent of pesticides applied by



residential users in 1970 was during the period from April



to September.  For insecticides, 44 percent were used in the



summer months, 33 percent in the spring, 19 percent in the



fall and less than ft percent in the winter.  Most herbicides



were used in spring or summer; 27 and 36 percent
                             92

-------
respectively.  Less than 19 percent was used in each of the



other 2 quarters.  Fungicide use by homeowners was



inconsequential during all quarters of the year.



     Pesticides for homeowners usually contain a lower



percentage of active ingredients than those for industry or



agriculture.  Most homeowners do not have sophisticated



application equipment.  Pesticides for homeowners are often



formulated to be applied undiluted by hand or with simple



low pressure applicators.  The hazard to people, neighboring



property, and susceptible nontarget organisms is minimized



by keeping concentrations low.  Herbicides are increasingly



being sold as part of a lawn-care package which contains



needed plant nutrients as well as pesticides to control



undesirable species like crabgrass.







     Aerosol packages are very popular for applying liquid



formulations of insecticides and fungicides.  Combinations



of pesticides for multipurpose use are available to



homeowners.  These usually include one or more insecticides



as well as at least one fungicide.







     Pesticide materials for turf are often formulated in



granular form to be applied with fertilizer equipment.
                              93

-------
                           Industrial  Use





     Pesticides used in industry involve less  seasonality



than most other kinds.  Use of pesticides in manufacturing



processes continue throughout the year.  Municipal water



supplies are treated for algae regularly.  However,



pesticides used for controlling pests around industrial



facilities are subject to seasonal use similar to those for



residential users.







     Some of the pesticides used by  industry are packaged in



very large containers, often in highly concentrated form.



Technical grade materials are often  used.  Much of the



material is applied by plane or helicopter, often by



commercial applicators.  Liquid formulations are probably



most common.



     Many pesticides used in forests are applied by



aircraft.  Others, particularly for  selective tree removal,



are applied to individual trees, often through injection



into the trunk.  This is usually done during the growing



season,







     Aguatic pesticides are of two types, those applied to



the water, and those applied to banks, but not to the water.



The water-applied type is put directly into the water and



carried by it to the target.  Such pesticides are usually



chosen on the basis of safety and effectiveness.  For bank



control, care is often reguired to avoid water



contamination.  Thus hand or ground power equipment is
                            94

-------
frequently used.  Application is usually during the growing
season.  However, care must be exercised to avoid
contamination of water used to irrigate susceptible crops or
of drinking water for livestock or people.

     Use of custom application is probably higher for
industry than for other users.


                     Public Health Use
     In the continental United States, late summer is the
most likely time for mosquito-borne arboviral diseases to
occur, and for major vector control programs to be
undertaken.  Most  (85 percent) of the vector control
pesticides used in California in 1970 were applied during
July through September.  About 11 percent was applied in
April through June and a very little from October through
March.

     Major vector control efforts such as those in the
recent Venezuelan Equine Epidemic Program are usually
conducted with air equipment.
                               95

-------
                              Other Uses







     In California, pesticide use by various government



agencies was distributed rather uniformly throughout the



year.  In parts of the country with greater summer-winter



weather variations, a much higher proportion would be



applied during the summer.  Other nonfarm pesticides were



also purchased rather uniformly throughout the year in



California.  In general, pesticide use would be expected to



be more uniformly distributed in California than in cooler



climate areas.  However, structure pest control, a



significant factor in the nonfarm use of pesticides, may be



rather evenly distributed even in the cooler climates.  It



would probably be influenced by the level of building



construction activity.
                               96

-------
                          LIST OF REFERENCES
                                   >
 (l)   Benenson, Abrara S.
        1970.   Control of Communicable Diseases in Man.   Amer.  Public
                Health Assoc., N.Y.

 (2)   Blake, Helen; Andrilenas, Paul; Jenkins,  Robert;  Eichers, Theodore;
       and Fox, Austin.
        1970.   Farmers' Pesticide Expenditures  in 1966.  U.S..  Dept.  Agr. ,
        Agr. Econ.  Rpt. .192, Sept.

 (3)   Burnett, Sir Frank MacFarlane,
        1962.   Natural History of Infectious Diseases.   Cambridge  Univ.
                Press, Cambridge.

 (k)   California Department of Agriculture.
        1971.   Pesticide Use Report  1970.   Feb.

 (5)   Chemical Week.
        1971-   Mosquitoes repel insecticides.   Vol.  109, No.  5> p.  36,
                Aug. U.  McGraw-Hill Inc., New  York.

 (6)   Davis, Velmar W.
        1970.   Farmers' Use of Pesticides  and Pesticide  Containers.
                Natl. Conf. on Pesticide Disposal, Econ. Res.  Serv.,
                Wash., D. C.  Jun. 30-Jul. 1.

 (7)   Eichers, Theodore; Andrilenas,  Paul; Blake, Helen; Jenkins,  Robert;
       and Fox, Austin.
        1970.   Quantities of Pesticides Used by Farmers  in 1966.   U.S.
                Dept. Agr., Agr. Econ. Rpt.  179, Apr.

 (8),' Ennis, W. B.  , Jr.
        1971.   Benefits of Agricultural Chemicals.  Annual Workers'
                Conf, Agr. Expt. Sta., Texas A&M Univ.,  Jan.  11.

 (9)   Fowler, D. Lee, Mahan, John N. , and  Shepard, Harold H.
       '1971.   The Pesticide Review 1970.   U.S.  Dept. Agr., Agr. Stabil.
                and Conserv. Serv. Feb.

(10)   Fox, Austin; Eichers, Theodore; Andrilenas, Paul;  Jenkins, Robert;
       and Blake, Helen.
        1968.   Extent of Farm Pesticide Use on.Crops in 1966.   U.S.  Dept.
                Agr., Agr. Econ. Rpt. lU7, Oct.

(ll)   Henderson, H. L.
        1952.   Household Insects.  Insects, The Yearbook of Agriculture
                U.S. Dept. of Agr.
                            97

-------
(12)   Howell, J.  H.., King, E.  L. , Jr., Smith*, A.  J. ,  and Hanson, L. H.
        196U.  Synergism of 5, 2-Dichloro-U-Nitro Salicylanilide and
                3-Trifluorinethyl U-Nitrophenol in Selective Lamprey
                Larvicide, Great Lakes Fishery Commission Tech.  Rpt. 8.

(13)   Hull, T. G. , editor.
        1963.  Diseases Transmitted from Animals  to Mau.  Charles C. Thomas,
               "Pub., Springfield, 111.

(lk)   James, Maurice T. , and Harwood, Robert F.
        1969.  Hera's Medical Entomology.  Macmillan, London.

(15)   Jenkins, Robert; Eichers , Theodore; Andrilenas , Paul; and Fox, Austin.
        1968.  Farmers' Expenditures for Custom Pesticide Service in 196H.
                U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. Econ. Rpt.  li»6, Oct.

(16)   Metcalf, R. L.
        1971.  Putting Pesticides and Pollution in Perspective.   Proc.  of
                23rd Illinois  Custom Spray Operators'  Training School,
                Coop. Ext. Serv. , Univ. of 111. in cooperation with
                111. Natural History Survey, Urbana,  111. ,  pp. 11-18,
                Jan. 27-28.

(17)   National Academy of Sciences.
        1966.  Scientific Aspects of Pest Control.  Natl.  Res.  Council,
                Publ.
(18)  Pest Control.
        1971-   Public Health Pesticides.   Pp.  13-^9,  Mar.  The  Harvest
                Publishing Co.

(19)  Pratt, Harry D. , Littig,  Kent S. , and Marshall, Clarence  W.
        1962.   Insecticides for the Control of Insects of  Public  Health
                Importance — Training Guide, Insect  Control Series.
                U.S.  Dept. HEW, PHS, Communicable Disease  Center, Atlanta,
                Ga.

(20)  _
        I960.   Introduction to Arthropods  of Publifc  Health Importance.
                U.S.  Dept.  HEW, PHS, Center for Disease  Control,
                Atlanta, Ga.

(21)  Stanford Research Institute.
        1968.   Chemical Economics Handbook, pp, 5573.7^20  A-Z,  573-7^21
                A-F,  Nov.
                                 98

-------
(22)  Stoddard, Charles  H.
        1968.  Essentials  of Forestry Practice,   Ronald Press  Co.,
                New York.

(23)  Strickler,  Paul E.
        1962.  Extent of Spraying and Dusting  on  Farms,  1958,  with
               .Comparisons.   U.S.  Det. Agr. ,  Stat. Bill. No. 311*, May.

(2k)  Top,  Franklin H.,  Sr.
        1968.  Communicable  and Infectious  Diseases.   C. U. Mosby
                Co., St.  Louis, Mo.

(25)  U.S.  Bureau of the Census.
        1967  and  1971.   Census of Agriculture, 1961* and  1969.   Statistics
                for States and Counties.

(26)  	
        1970.1967 Census of Business.  Selected Area Service
                 Statistics, Part  1,  Dec.

 (27)  U.S.  Department of Agriculture.
        1971.   Better Lawns.   Home and Garden Bui.  51, ARS-USDA, July.

 (28)	
         1961-1971.   Estimated Cash Expenditures for Production Supplies
                 and Equipment by Farm Operators, by States, 1960-1970.
                 Farmer Cooperative Serv.
 (29)
 (30;
         1971.   Lawn Weed Control with Herbicides.   Home and  Garden
                 Bui. 123, April.
         1968.   Extent and Cost of Weed Control with  Herbicides and
                 an Evaluation of Important  Weeds,  1965.  Agr. Res.
                 Serv., Fed.  Ext. Serv.  and  Econ. Res.  Serv., ARS
                 3U-102, Aug.
 (31)
         1965.A Survey of Extent and Cost  of Weed  Control  and Specific
                 Weed Problems.   Agr.  Res. Serv.  and Fed.  Ext. Serv. , ARS
                 3U-23-1, Aug.
 (32)   U.S.  House of Representatives.
         1971.   Federal Pesticide Control Act  of  1971.  Hearings before
                 the Committee on Agriculture, House  of Representatives,
                 Ninety-second Congress (First Session).
                                  99

-------
(33)   Washington Newsletter.
        1971.  1971 Statistics of Agricultural Aircraft.   Vol.  5, No.  3
                p. 2, June 10.  Natl.  Agr.  Aviation Assoc.,  Wash., D.C.

(31*)   White-Stevens, Robert.
        1970.  The Economic and Environmental Impact of Pesticides,
                52nd Annual Meeting of American Farm Bureau  Federa-
                tion, Houston, Tex., Dec.  7.

(35)   Wisconsin Statistical Reporting Service.
        1971.  General Farm Use of Pesticides,  1970—Wisconsin  and
                Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Minnesota.   Wise.
                Dept. of Agr. , Apr.

(36)
        1970.  General Farm Use of Pesticides,  1969—Wisconsin  and
                Illionis, Indiana, Michigan,  and Minnesota.  Wise.
                Dept. of Agr., Mar.

(37)  World Health Organization.
        1956.  Toxic Hazards of Pesticides  to Man.  Tech. Rpt.  Ser.

(50)  Good, J. M.
        1968.  Assessment of Crop Losses  Caused by Nematodes in the
                United States, Food and Agriculture Organization,
                FAO Plant Protection Bulletin,  June.
                            100

-------
             CHAPTER III




ANALYSIS OF THE MEANS AVAILABLE FOR




    REDUCING PESTICIDE USE

-------
                              Introduction
     Alternative pest control methods are available that can
reduce the quantity of chemical pesticides used.  Integrated
control programs, biological and genetic controls, cultural
practices, careful management, and pest resistant crops all
have potential to reduce the quantity of pesticides used.
                     Integrated Control
     Integrated control  involves a combined use of the most
effective means of bringing maximum pressure on a
destructive pest.  This  may include a combination of
biological, genetic, chemical, or mechanical methods™
Integrated control techniques are available for several
kinds of pests, but may  offer most hope for reducing
pesticides used on insects.

     Programs for cotton insects, tobacco hornwcrms, green
peach aphids, and codling moths provide examples of
effective integrated insect control programs,  Weeds in
cotton have been controlled by coordinating the use of weed-
free seed with herbicide treatment and flaming.
                             101

-------
     The U.S. Department of Agriculture initiated a large-
scale pilot test in 1971 to determine the feasibility of
eradicating the boll weevil with present capabilities.  The
pilot test involved a combination of insecticides
 (reproductive-diapause treatments), cultural measures, sex
attractants, and release of sterile insects in an all-out
eradication effort.

     An experimental integrated program involving light
traps and tobacco stalk destruction to prevent late-season
breeding of tobacco hornworms was conducted from 1962 to
 1968.  In the center of the 113 square mile test area abou-t
 50 percent destruction of the hornworm was obtained the
 first year and almost 80 percent the next 2 years.
 Subsequently, few insecticide treatments have been needed
within the experimental area.  In recent-years, the hornworm
populations have been low and the experiment has been
 terminated (15 ).

     Experimental results of an integrated program to
control the green peach aphid, a vector of the yellow virus
of sugar beets, resulted in an 83 percent reduction of virus
infected plants.  Costs were reduced from $18.60 per acre
for partial control of aphids with conventional insecticides
to $1.60 per acre (21).

     An integrated program for the control of the codling
                                102

-------
moth on apples takes advantage of reduced populations
resulting from past insecticidal treatments, and from
sanitation practices.  Sterilized moths are then introduced.
The resulting infestation rate was about the same as for a
regular spray program on an adjacent orchard (2).
                Biological and Genetic Control
     Biological and  genetic controls are sufficiently
promising to encourage continuing research.  However, it is
difficult to mass  produce biological agents and certain
species of sterile insects.  This and the specificity of the
agents, usually to one species, indicates that dependence on
these methods for  practical pest control will be some years
in the future  (17).

     Studies are underway to evaluate various pathogenic
agents as a possible means of insect control.  The pathogens
under investigation  appear to be highly specific in that
they infect only certain insect species and do not appear to
be transmissible to  other organisms, including mammals.
However, more toxicological data must be obtained to provide
assurance of safety  before such agents can be approved and
registered for use on food crops.
                              103

-------
     Other potentially important new biological methods
under investigation include insect sex attractants, insect
hormones, and weed-eating insects.  While these show
promise, it may be some time before they will be available
for general use.  Limited commercial production of a new
viral insecticide, Viron-H, to be used in field testing
against the cotton bcllworm, has been started.  The new
material, a polyhedrosis virus, will probably be priced
higher than DDT, but in the same range as other insecticide
and insecticide combinations, used to control cotton pests
 (5).  The virus will also control corn ear worms and tobacco
budworms.

     Parasitic wasps used against alfalfa weevils saved
farmers more than 600,000 dollars in 1969 or about 5 dollars
per acre for insecticides, labor, and equipment otherwise
needed to control the weevils  (U).

     The most  notable success in genetic control has been
with the screw-worm.  The eradication of the screw-worm has
prevented losses to cattle raisers of as much as 20 million
dollars a year in the Southeast and 100 million dollars in
the Southwest (15).

     One characteristic of biological control for crops is
that each method usually controls only one species of pest
while the crop may be infested with several species.
                                104

-------
However, biological control of selected  pest  species  coupled
with chemical or cultural measures  for other  pests  should
help reduce use of pesticides.
              Cultural and Managerial controj.
     Cultural methods  have  long been important in pest
control.  These  include destroying crop plants after harvest
to prevent further  reproduction of insects, tilling the soil
to destroy insects  and weeds, rotating crops to minimize
insect reproduction and to  make crops more competitive with
weeds, and adjusting planting times to avoid high insect and
weed population  densities during the growing season.

     Pesticides  use can be  reduced by replacing routine
treatment schedules with treat-when-necessary schedules
based on managerial decisions.  Number and age of insects,
spore counts, rainfall forecasts, and the like can be used
by managers to decide  whether an application of pesticides
is necessary.
     For example, peach growers in California could reduce
the quantity of  fungicides necessary to control brown rot by
using such indicators  as spore counts and forecasts of
rainfall within  a  2<4  to HB hour period (3).  In the
Mississippi Delta,  average cotton insect control costs
                               105

-------
declined 24 to 44 percent when treatments were made only



when the number and age of insects reached a critical point




(6).







     Application at a time when pests are most vulnerable is



another technique that can reduce the quantity of pesticides



used.  In a diapause control program to eradicate boll



weevils, late generations of weevils are killed in the fall.



By preventing the weevils from going into diapause, over-



wintering populations of weevils are reduced by as much as



97 percent.  Two or three insecticide applications in the



fall can replace six to eight early and mid-season



applications in the following spring and summer.  In this



way it is possible to reduce insect control costs as much as



seven dollars per acre  (22)-



     Systemic pesticides have a high potential for reducing



the quantity of pesticides required to effectively control



pests.  Systemic chemicals usually give better and longer-



lasting control with less material and fewer applications.



As an example. New York researchers were able to cut the



number of insecticide applications on potatoes from ten or



more down to five (19).








     The development of systemics is likely to be slow and



the first costs will be relatively high.  Development must



consider the ability of the systemic material to distinguish



between pests and nondestructive organisms.  Attention must
                                 106

-------
also be  paid to the  possibility of  chemical residues  in the
final  product that might be hazardous to livestock  or man.

     New techniques  of applying pesticides may  reduce the
quantity of pesticides necessary to obtain effective
control.  Foam generators, concentrate spraying, polymer
coatings, and synergistic combinations of pesticides  are
some of  the new methods being evaluated.
     Experimental  trials indicate that foam generators may
be  an  effective means of reducing quantities of pesticides
used.   Foams generally cover and control the treated  surface
more uniformly than  other application methods.

     Concentrate spraying, in some situations, obtains  control  results
 equal  to those obtained by using standard procedures of dilute  sprays.
 Concentrate spraying  allows the grower to obtain effective control
 with up to 25 percent less spray material per acre.  There is also
 less run-off from plant surfaces, which reduces the quantity of
 chemical  used (1).  However when volatile pesticides are used,  a
 reduction in the volume of spray may increase drift from the target
 area and reduce effectiveness.


                    pest Resistant   Crops
      One means  of  controlling  crop pests is to  develop
                                107

-------
varieties that resist insects, diseases, or nematodes, but



this requires long years of tedious research.  Once



developed, a pest-resistant crop involves little or no



expense to growers and no chemical residue or other adverse



side effects,  outstanding examples are resistance to the



Hessian f|y on wheat, the spotted alfalfa aphid on alfalfa,



and stem rust on wheat.  Another more recent success is the



development of a soybean resistant to soybean cyst nematode



 (14 ) .  Resistant varieties to most crop pests are not yet



available.  (17)










                 Restricting PesticideUse
     In general, alternatives to pesticides might be



preferable to legal limitations on their use.  However,



legal restrictions may sometimes be required.  For example,



tax or incentive programs could be developed to encourage



pesticide users to reduce the quantity of pesticides used.



Also pesticides could be prohibited for certain uses or



banned completely.  Such restrictions would require



substantial adjustments in pest management programs.








     Other legal restrictions may also help in reducing



pesticide use.  For example, restrictions on the



introduction of foreign species of plants that might become



weeds in the U.S. and on interstate movement of weed seeds,
                               108

-------
roots, or other propagating materials might greatly reduce



the need for chemical weed control.  Such restrictions



already exist for some destructive insects and disease-



inducing organisms.







     Restricting farm use of a pesticide means that farmers



usually must substitute more expensive chemicals, change



their cultural practices, or accept a loss in yield.  The



Economic Research Service estimates show that a selective



restriction of organochlorine insecticides on cotton, corn,



peanuts, and tobacco would have cost farmers 26.7 million



dollars or 2.23 dollars per acre treated in 1966  (Table  1)



 (7).  It is also estimated that to replace the phenoxy



herbicides used in  farm production in 1969 farmers would



have had to use an  additional 5.7 million acres of cropland



and 19_6 million hours of family labor.  Production expenses



would have increased by 289.3 million dollars  (Table 2)




 (13)-



     Another study  assumes that if 2,tt,5-T were the only



phenoxy herbicide banned  for domestic use the cost to farm



and nonfarm users in 1969 would have been 51.7 trillion



dollars  (Table 3)  (12).   Other phenoxy herbicides could  have



been used as substitutes on nearly 5.6 million acres of  a



total of 7.9 million acres treated with 2,4,5-T_  On the



average, costs of additional cultural practices for farmers



and non-farmers would have been about $16 an acre on over 39



percent of the acres treated with 2,^,5-T-
                                 109

-------
        Table 1.—Costs of substituting organophosphate and carbaroate insecticides for
                  organorhlorines in cotton,  corn,  peanut,  and tobacco production,
                                           United States,  1966
             Item
Unit
Cotton
Corn
Peanuts
Tobacco
Total
1966 practices _!/	  Mil. dol,

Substitute practices:
  Organochlorines---	-.-_     do.
  Organ oph'osphates	     do.
  Carbamates	     do.

    Total	     do.

Additional costs:
  Materials	     do.
  Application	     do.

    Total	     do.

  Per acre treated with
   organochlorines	   Dollars

  Percentage  of crop value	   Percent
            34.8
             4.0
            46.1
            50.1
            10.6
             4.8
            15.4
             3.12

             1.2
             24.3
             16.2
             13.9
              1.6
             31.7
              7.3
              7.3
              1.23

               .2
             4.8
             2.7
             3.6
             6.3
              .9
              .5
             1.4
             2.90

              .5
              4.2
              1.2
              5.6
              6.8
              1.0
              1.6
              2.6
              4.22

               .2
            68.2
            20.2
            63.9
            10.8
            94.9
            19.8
             6.9
            26.7
             2.23

              .3
  \J  Data from ERS Pesticide and General Farm Survey, 1966.

  Source:  Econ. Res. Sej-v.  (7)

-------
      Table  2 .--Effects of restricting the use of phenoxy herbicides in farm production, United States, 1969 J7
Crop
Corn 	 	 	
Wheat 	
Other small grain..


Pasture 	

Total 	

Acres on
which
phenoxys
used
1966
1,000
acres
23,136
14,577
9,692
3,558
145
3,590
5,178
2,589
62,465
Additional
inputs needed
I and 2/
1,000
acres
3,335
1,838
538
5,711
: Family
: labor
1,000
hours
5,003
2,757
142
3,648
4,736
3,292
19,578
Lower
phenoxy
and
application
costs
Additional costs
Substitute
herbicides
and
application
A'.Uitiona !.
cultural
practices V
T --iduction
on
additional
acres _3/
Not
arfciiVJ.c.'-'
C.USU;..

37.0
21.9
14.6
5.6
.4
5.4
10.4
7.2
102.5
122.5
15.3
10.9
14.5
163.2
21.2
12.1
9.1
2.4
1/6.4
43.3
43.1
137.6
45.0
23.1
1.6
21.3
91.0
106.7
50.5
28.5
11.3
7.6
15.9
• 32.9
35.9
289.3
   \_l  Estimates based on use shewn by the ERS Pesticide and General Farm Survey,  1966,  and on  substitute  practices
avaTlable in 1969.  Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.  Does not include fence rows,  ditches,  building  sites,  other
noncropland, Government-sponsorec control programs, nor any nonfarm use.
   2/  Calculated based on ARS e;timates of yield reductions.
   2/  Includes costs for hired ]abor assuming the national average ratio of hired labor to total  labor  used  for  each
crop.
   kj  Additional costs for alteinative materials, for growing new acreages, and for lower  payments  less the  lower
expenditures for phenoxy herbicii es.
   _5/  Additional costs for cultt ral practices and loss in quality related to maintaining rice  production  minus returns
for rice above those for soybean: on the additional acres where rice was  grown in  place  of  soybeans.   Includes  $2.2
million for lower income from lots in quality.
   Source:   Econ. Res.  Serv.  (12)

-------
                     Table 3,—Economic  effects  of  restricting 2,4,5-T, if other phenoxy herbicides and all  other  registered herbicides could have been used,
                                                                            United States, 1969 I/
Estimated
acres
Use category ' treated
: with
1 2,4,5-T
Acres that
could be
treated
with
alternative
Acres
requiring
additional
cul tural
practices
Cost of
2,4,5-T
and
application
Cost of
, : Cost of
alternative ... . ,
. , , : additional
herbicides ,
. : cultural
and .
, . . : practices
application , v
Net increased
cost of using
alternatives
?./
K»
Farm use:



Nonfarm use:

Rights-of-way 8/9/ 	 ,






2,441
	 671
339
	 : 3,451
	 : 296
,, 	 : 1,200
	 : 2,175
	 430
	 : 81
	 : 306
	 : 4,488
	 : 7,939

-i_,uuu acres 	
488
654
225
1,367
281
1,200
1,958
387
73
291
4,190
5,557

1,953
660
114
2,727
15
60
217
43
8
15
358
3,085

4,0j2
1,764
2,204
8,020
3,287
2,850
33,772
3,738
608
2,219
46,474
54,494

1,781
1,130
2,115
5,026
3,765
3,720
36,028
4,411
760
3,026
51,710
56,736

32,44j
1,720
766
34,929
735
240
9,548
3,363
240
375
14,501
49,430

30 , ..
1 , -j • j
67/
31,935
1,213
1,110
11,804
4,036
392
1,382
19,737
51.672

                      \l Based on estimated  USP  In  1
-------
     If no other phenoxys  could  have  substituted  for  2,U,5-
T, costs would  have  invreased  to $172 million,  about  four
times the cost  of usinq  2,4,5-T.   The farmers'  share  of  this
cost increase would  have been  
-------
               Table  4.—- Econoitc effects of restricting  2,4,5-T, if no  '   .. phenoxy herbicides  could have  been  used
                              but ill other registered hei'biciiies  could have been used, United States,  1969 I/   •
' Estimated
] acres
Use category j •.:raat<:'l
with
; 2, 4, 5-T
Acres that
could be
tres t pd
wi un
alternative
Acres
requiring
additional
cultural
practices
Cost of
2, 4, 5-T
and
application
Cost of
alternative
herbicides
and
application
Cost of
additional
cultural
practices
Net increased
cost of using
alternatives
_2/
Farm use:
Hay, pasture, and rangeland 3/ 	 ,
Other crops 4/ 	 '. 	
Other farm use 5/ 	
Total farm use 	
Nonfarm use:
Federal Government 6/ 	 ,

Rights-of-way 8/ 	 	 	 ,
Private nonfarra forests 9/ 	
Aquatic areas 10/ 	 ,
Other uses ll/ 	 ,
Total nonf arm use 	
Total all uses 	

	 : 2,441
	 : 671
	 : -J39
	 : 3,451

	 : 296
	 : 1,200
	 : 2,175
	 : 430
	 : 81
	 : 306
	 : 4,488
	 : 7,939

	
428
200
628

83
1,200
1,631
	
	
	
2,914
3,542

2,441
479
139
3,059

213
1,200
544
430
81
306
2,774
5,833

4,052
1,764
2,204
8,020

3,287
2,850
33,772
3,733
60S
2,219
46,474
54,494

	
1,801
4,585
6,386

3,901
2,310
84,812
	
	
	
91,023
97,409

40,551
3,301
1,866
45,718

10,863
4,800
23,936
33,630
2,430
7.650
83,309
129,027

36, •.•••)
3, *
4 , : W
44,084

11,477
4,260
74,976
29,892
1,822
5,431
127,858
171,942
   _IJ Based on estimated use in 1'
   2/ Cost of alternative herbici
   _3_/ Cultural treatments include
thirds at $23,16 an acre, and now
   4/ Weeds on some acres of most
chemical substitutes used include
sorghum, small grains, and noncro.
in spite of yield losses.  In ric.
and offset loss in quality,
   _5/ Picloram was applied on the
   b_l Based on 1969 use by the De
adjuvant were substituted for 2,4
mechanical, and manual control av<
   _7/ All acres' can be treated ui:
   8/ Two pounds of picloram with
hand cutting at $44 an acre.
   9/ All acres nad to be mowed,  :
  107 All acres needed to be  mech .
  ll/ All acres required mechanic.
54.
cs and application plus cost of  additional  cultural practices less cost of 2,4,5-T and application,
renovating a third of Che acres  at  $15.66 an acre; then bulldozing 72 percent  of the  remaining  two-
rig the other 28 percent at $1.50 an acre.
crops treated with 2,4,5-T in 1964  could have been controlled with nonphenoxy  herbicides.   Important
dicanba, and atrazine and oil.   Supplemental hand or mechanical control was also required  on some  com,
land.  Additional acres of wheat, other small grains, and other crops were grcwn to maintain production
 production additional fertilizer and a change in the crop rotation were required to maintain production

noncropland.  Substitute practices  also included seme moving and handweeding.
artments of Agriculture, Interior,  and Defense; and TVA.  Two pounds of picloram with a drift reducing
5-T on 75 percent of federally maintained rights-of-way (110,000).  All other acres required cultural,
raging $51 per acre,
h 0.5 pound dicnmba but supplemental manual work costing $4 per acre was required on all acres.
a drift reducing adjuvant were substituted  for 2,4,5-T on 75 percent of all acres.  The remainder  required

and cut, or undesirable species  hand girdled at a cost of $78.21 per treated acre.
nically cleaned with a drag line at $30 per acre treated.
1 control by hand or with machines  at $25 per acre.
  Source:    Econ.  Res.  Serv.  (12)

-------
     So far, the major factor in reducing the use of



persistent material has been the development of resistance



to chemicals on the part of the pests.  Often, less



persistent pesticides are then substituted.  For the near



future, this is likely to continue to provide a major



incentive for further reductions in use of persistent



pesticides.







     The effect of substituting less persistent pesticides



for persistent ones was illustrated in two recent studies,



In one, the substitution of less persistent insecticides for



persistent organochlorine insecticides reduced the quantity



of organochlorine insecticides by 55 million pounds or 76



percent  (7).  In the other all of the 10 million pounds of



aldrip used on corn was replaced by less persistent



pesticides  (18) -







     Although less persistent pesticides can replace the



more persistent in certain instances, the impact on the



environment is frequently not known.  We do know that



replacement with toxic orqanophosphate materials increases



the immediate hazard to people.  Experience also indicates



that widespread use of many of the substitute compounds is



harmful to certain beneficial organism such as pollinating



insects, parasites, and predators.
                                115

-------
                       Research Needs
     Reducing use of chemical pesticides depends heavily on
the development of satisfactory alternative control
techniques.  Substantial research in recent years has
explored biological and genetic control, resistant
varieties, integrated methods, and cultural and managerial
device.  Some outstanding successes have resulted.  One
example is the control of the screw-worm by using sterile
males.  However, alternative methods have thus far replaced
pesticides for only a few major pest problems, and chemicals
continue to be the primary method of controlling most pests.
The need to continue and expand such research is urgent if
alternatives are to replace a significant part of the
chemical pesticides now in use.

     Primary focus should be on alternative methods for
pests of major economic importance.  Most alternative
methods demand more information on the life history and
population dynamics of pests than does the successful use of
chemical pesticides (15).

     More work on pesticide chemicals is also needed to
develop chemicals specific to the target pest and not to
other organisms, to develop formulations that use smaller
quantities of active ingredients, and to improve breakdown
                             116

-------
characteristics so that chemical residues are not left in



the environment.  Further attention should also be directed



to the modifications in application equipment that would



increase the proportion of pesticide actually utilized.







     Research on benefits and costs is necessary to appraise



the impact of reducing the use of persistent pesticides.



Existing data are less than adequate to measure the



consequences of restricting the use of a particular



pesticide, or of changing patterns and techniques of



pesticide application.



     Experiments  should be designed to measure yield



variations between  plots with similar infestations under



different degrees of chemical, mechanical, and biological



treatment,  There is also a need for experiments to measure



how different parts of an integrated program  (chemical,



mechanical or biological) affect crop yields.







     Economic research requires not only additional cost



data but estimates of price elasticity of demand and cross



elasticities.  Research is especially necessary to estimate



appropriate demand elasticities associated with different



uses of the same product and with large fluctuations in




supply (10, 11).







     These data are needed for several kinds of economic



research on pesticides.  For example, such information is
                                117

-------
essential in appraising the direct costs of  restricting



certain pesticides, in minimizing pollution  hazards,  in



evaluating the substitution of other inputs  for  pesticides,



and in analyzing the costs and  benefits  to society  (20)-
                                  118

-------
                          List  of  References
(l)   Ball, Carre 7.1
       1970.  What You Should Know About Concentrate Spraying.
               Farm Chemicals, Feb., p. Ii3.

(2)   Butt, B. A,
       1967.  recent Progress in the Release of Sterile Codling Moth.
               "voc. of Wash. State Hort. Vol. 63, p. 15.

(3)   Carlson, 0. A.
       1969.  A Decision Theoretic Approach to Crop Disease
               1-re diet ion and Control.  Unpublished Ph.D. thesis,
               Univ. of Calif., Davis.

(U)   Chemical V.-.sk.
       1970.  Washington Newsletter.  Wasps and Alfalfa Weevils.
               Jun. 10, p. 28.

(5)   	
       1971-  Technology Newsletter.  New Viral Insecticide.  Feb.
               10, p. 50.

(6)  Cooke, Fred T., Jr.
       1971-  The Effect of Restricting DDT or Chlorinated Hydro-
               carbons on Coi'iMercial Cotton Farms in the Mississippi
               Delta.  Proc. of a Symposium on Economic Research
               on Pesticides for Policy Decisionmaking, Econ. Res.
               Serv., Wash., B.C., Apr. 27-29, 1970, pp. 123-136, Apr.

(7)  Davis, Velroar W., Fox, Austin S., Jenkins, Robert P., and
      Andrilens.s, Paul A.
       1970.  Economic Consequences of Restricting the Use of
               Drganochlorine Insecticides on Cotton, Corn,
               Peanuts, and Tobacco.  U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. Econ.
               Rpt.  178, Mar.

(8)  Farm  Chemicals.
       1969.  Foam Generator Provides Drift-free Herbicide Control.
               Nov., p. 8.

(9)  Farm  Journal.
       1969-  News.  New Southern Alfalfa.  May, p. 35-

(10) Fox,  Austin S.
       1971.  Economic Impact of Restricting Herbicide Use, Am. Society
               of Agronomy, Crop Science Soc. of Am.  and Soil Science
               Soc.  of Am., New York, Aug. 15-20.
                                119

-------
(11)	
       1971-  Economic Consequences of Restricting or Banning  the  Use
               of Pesticides.  Proc. of a'Symposium, on Economic  Research
               on Pesticides for Policy Decisionmaking, Econ.  Res.  Serv.,
               Wash., B.C., Apr. 27-29, 1970.  p. 3^8, Apr.

(12) 	, Jenkins, Robert P., Holstun, John T. , Jr.,  and
      Klingman, Dayton L.
       1971.  Restricting the Use of 2,U,5-T:  Costs to Domestic
               Users.  U.S. Kept. Agr., Agr. Econ. Rpt. 199. Mar.

(13) 	, Jenkins, Robert P., Andrilenas, Paul A.,  Holstun,
      John T., Jr., and Klingman, Dayton L.
       1970.  Restricting the Use of Phenoxy Herbicides—Costs to
               Farmers.  U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. Econ. Rpt. 19^> Nov.

(lit) Good, J. M.
       1968.  Assessment of Crop Losses Caused by Hematodes in the
               United States.  FAO Plant Protection Bulletin,  Vol.  16,
               No. 3: 37-^0.  Food and Agr. Org. of the UN, Rome,  Italy,
               Jun.

(15) Hoffmann, C. H.
       1973.  Restricting the Use of Insecticides—What are the  Alterna-
               tives?  Proc. of a Symposium on Economic Research on
               Pesticides for Policy Decisionmaking, Econ. Res.  Serv.,
               Wash., D.C., Apr. 27-29, 1970.  pp. 21-30, Apr.

(16) 	
       1970.  Alternatives to Conventional Insecticides  for  Control  of
               Insect Pests.  Agricultural Chemicals, Vol. 25, No. 10,
               pp. 19, 21-23, 35.

(17) Irving, G. W., Jr.
       1970.  Agricultural Pest Control and the Environment.  Science  168:
               ,L-T,t> -"_U-TL.. -i •  -ntu» jrttj ..in *  x woT  oi.±v_ j-is^ * ci.ii uCiuc^i u  C-i.  i-'C-i.tiAj.CC;*

(l8) Jenkirib-, R. P. and Eichers, T. R.
               Economic Effects of Eliminating Aldrin in Corn Production.
                Unpublished manuscript.

(19) Successful Farming.
       1970.  What's New for Pest Control, Apr., p. ha.

(20) Sund;juis-.., W. B.
       1973.  Directions for Future Research on Pesticides.  Proc. of a
               Symposium on Economic  Research on Pesticides  for  Policy
               Decisionmaking, Econ.  Res. Serv., Wash.,  D.C.  Apr. 27-29,
               1970.  pp. 169-170, Apr.
                                120

-------
(21) Wallis, R. L.
       1968.  Suppression of Green Peach Aphids and Beet Western
               Yellows in Sugarbeet Fields in the Northwest.   Proc.
               5th Ann. Symp. of Thermal Agriculture, Natl.  Gas.
               Proc. Assoc.

(22) Wilborn, E.
       1969.  Diapause Control—First Step in Weevil Eradication,
               Progressive Farmer, Sept.  p.  ^8.
                             121

-------
APPENDIX TABLES

-------
    Table  1.—Farm use of insecticides  by crops, United States, I96k and 1966 I/
           Crop
                                      1961*
  Active
ingredients
    2/
'  Percentage
;    of all
'  ingredients
     used
                                      1966
  Active
ingredients
    2/
•  Percentage
:    of all
'  ingredients
     used
                              Million
                              pounds        Percent

Cotton	     ?8.0           5U

Corn	     15-7           11

Vegetables 3/	      9-7            7

Other field crops h_/	     10.1            7

Apples	     10.8            8

Fruits (not including
 apples and citrus)	      1+.5            3

Hay and pasture 5/	      2,5            2

Tobacco	      5-5            U

Soybeans	      5-0            3

Citrus	      1.1*            1

Other	       6J           I/


  All crops	    143-2
                 100
                              Million
                              pounds

                               6U.9

                               23.6

                               11.1

                                8.7

                                8.5


                                6.6

                                l*.i

                                3.8

                                3.2

                                2.9

                                0.2
                  137.
                                Percent

                                  1*7

                                  17
                                   6

                                   6


                                   5

                                   3

                                   3

                                   2

                                   2

                                  7/
                 100
  !_/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.
  2/ Does not include petroleum.
  3/ Includes potatoes as well as other vegetables.
  U_/ Includes wheat, sorghum, rice, peanuts, and sugar beets, as well as other
grains and other field crops.
  5/ Includes alfalfa, other hay and forage, and pasture and rangeland.
  S/ Less than 50,000 pounds.
  7/ Less than 0.5 percent.

  Source:  Econ. Res. Serv. (7)
                                     122

-------
       Table  2.—Leading insecticides used on crops in the
                      United States, 1966 I/
Insecticide
Toxaphene— — 	 	
DDT- _ 	 	 	









Active
ingredients 2/
Million pounds
30.9
26.3
1U.8
11.8
8.U
8.0
5.6
U.3
39-3
137-6
Acres
treated
Million acres
5.U
8.1
13.8
3.8
6.1
U.5
5-2
2.2



!_/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.
2j Does not include petroleum.

Source:  Econ. Res. Serv. (?)
                             123

-------
    Table 3-—Farm use of herbicides, by crops, United States, 196U and 1966 I/
Crop

n+ViP»T "Pi P> 1 r\ pTwnQ "3 /_ ..
Pasture and rangeland 	
Uhpflt 	 — — — 	 — — — — —
Pryft nn— — 	 — — — —




Pi r»£».- — — — — — ___

Nursery and greenhouse 	

1961*
Active :
ingredients •
i/ :
Million
pounds
25-5
V19.0
U.7
U.2
9.2
It. 6
U.8
2.0
1.0
I/
i/
1.3
.«/
76. 3

Percentage
of all
ingredients
used
Percent
33
U/25
6
6
12
6
6
3
1
I/
i/
2
i/
100
1966
Active
ingredients :
2/ :
Million
pounds
146.0
10.8
10.5
10. U
8.2
6.5
5-7
lt.0
3.6
2.9
2.8
• 9
.1 .
112.it

Percentage
of all
ingredients
used
Percent
111
10
9
9
7
6
5
k
3
3
2
1
9./
100
  I/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.
  2] Does not include petroleum.
  J3/ Includes tobacco, sugar beets, alfalfa, and other hay, as well as other
grains and other field crops.
  _U/ Includes peanuts and rice in addition to the other field crops.
  5_/ Includes potatoes as well as other vegetables.
  6_/ Includes apples and citrus as well as other deciduous fruit and other
fruit and nut crops.
  7_/ Included in other field crops.
  J3/ Less than 50,000 pounds.
  9_/ Less than 0,5 percent.
  Source:   Econ.  Res.  Serv.  (7)
                                     124

-------
Table
Leading herbicides  used on  crops  by  farmers in the
         United States, 1966  I/
Herbicide
product

0 }i_T) 	 	 _ 	 	 _ „

Tri f lurs-Lin—
CT)AA- - 	 	 - - 	 - -
Of hf=>r*Q 	 — — —



Active
ingredients 2/
Million pounds
"30 ^
jy = ?
p-5 t:
«; p
S ' <-
k 9
•30 Q

1 12 k

: Acres
treated
Million acres
£,£, o
po .y
i s n
7 0
^. 7
2Q 2



.!/ Does nou, include Alaska and Hawaii.
2/ Does not include petroleum.

Source:  Econ. Res. Serv. (7)
                              125

-------
    Table 5.—Farm use of fungicides, by  crops, United States, 1961* and 1966 I/
Crop

O"t"VifiT' f*~i <=O r\ r*rirmc' "5 /___ _



Other fruits and nuts 5/ —
Other deciduous fruit 6_/ —
Pn*H~ nrt — — — — — — _______


196U
•
Active :
ingredients :
?J :
Million
pounds
7.8
5.6
t.5
U.9
3.7
l.U
2.6
I/
.2
30.7

Percentage
of all
ingredients
used
Percent
25
18
15
16
12
5
8
I/
1
100
1966
Active :
ingredients :
2/ :
Million
pounds
8.5
it. 5
l*.l
l».l
3.5
2.5
1.8
1.1
.U
30.5

Percentage
of all
ingredients
used
Percent
28
15
13
13
12
8
6
U
1
100
  I/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.
  2/ Does not include sulfur.
  _3/ Includes corn, sorghum, wheat, rice,  soybeans, tobacco, sugar beets, as
well as other grains, other field crops,  and other hay  and pasture.
  h/ Includes other vegetables.
  _5/ Includes other fruits and nuts.
  6/ Includes other deciduous fruit.
  "]_/ Data not available.

  Source:  Econ. Res. Serv.  (7)
                                     126

-------
Table £.-  Leading fungicides used on crops by farmers in the
                   United States, 1966 I/
Fungicide
product
Zineb— — — — — — — — — —

Copper (other than copper
ciil f* afp, ^ 	 	 „__ 	 _ _




Active
material 2J
Million pounds
6.8
6.6
U.5
It. it
8.2
Acres
: treated
Million acres
1.8
1.2
1.2
6
2.5
30.5
I/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.
2j Does not include sulfur.

Source:   Econ.  Ees. Serv. (7)
                           127

-------
      Table 7.—Farm use of miscellaneous pesticides on crops, United States,
                                  1961* and 1966 I/
           Crop
                                      1961*
                              Active
                            ingredients
*  Percentage
;    of all
]  ingredients
     used
                          1966
  Active
ingredients
                                                                     | Percentage
                                                                     ''   of all
                                                                      ingredients
                                                                         used
                              Million
                              pounds        Percent

Cotton	     12.lt           30

Tobacco	     17.6           It3

Other fruits and nuts 2j—      1.0            2

Other field crops _3/	      1.7            U

                                1.5            1*

Apples	      1.0            3

Vegetables k/	      5.9           lit

Corn	       .1           6J

Nursery and greenhouse	       J?/           6/


  All crops	     ltl.2
                                                          Million
                                                          pounds

                                                           lit.2

                                                           13.lt

                                                            8.7

                                                            7-6

                                                            1.1

                                                            1.1

                                                             -9

                                                             .6

                                                             .1
                                Percent

                                  30

                                  28

                                  18

                                  16

                                   2

                                   2

                                   2

                                   2

                                  6/
                                             100
                   1+7.7
                 100
  \J Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.
  2j Includes other deciduous fruits and other fruits and nuts.
  3/ Includes sorghum, wheat, rice, soybeans, sugar beets, peanuts, and
alfalfa, as well as other field crops, other grains, and other hay and pasture.
  jt_/ Includes potatoes as well as other vegetables.
  5/ Less than 50 ,000 pounds.
  6/ Less than 0.5 percent.

  Source:  Econ. Res. Serv. (7)
                                     128

-------
  Table  6.— Leading miscellaneous  pesticides  used on  crops by farmers
                      in the United States,  1966  I/
Product


n'PP fln ft Pril f*"y ( r?*=> f r>1 T orH- Q ^ __
•Maleic hydrazide (growth

All miscellaneous pesticides 	
Active
material
Million pounds
ik.Q
8.3
14.2
3.1
18.1
: Acres
: treated
Million acres
0.2
.h
1-7
.6
5.1
1*7.7
!_/ Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.

Source:  Econ. F.es. Serv. (7)
                                 129

-------
Table 9.—Leading pesticides used on selected crops, United States, 1970 I/
          Corn
         Citrus
                                 Soybeans
                                  Apjxl es
                                                           Cotton
Herbicides
2,k-:,
Alachlor
Atrazine
Propachlor
Sutan

Insecticides
BlDC*
Aldrin
Phorate
Diazinon
Carbofuran
Carbaryl
Fur, gic ides
Capt sn
Thiraai
Kaneb


Herbicides
Trifluralin
Aniben
2,1»-DB
Linuron
Alachlor
Kitralin
Insecticides
Toxaphene
Carbaryl
Methyl parathion
Malathion
Parathion

Fungicides
Capt an
Thiram
Maneb


Herbicides
Trifluralin
Diuron
Promet ryne
Fluometuron
Monuron

Insecticides
Methyl parathion
Toxaphene
Carb aryl
Azodrin
Guthion

Fungicides
Mercury
Chloroneb
Terracoat*
PCNB
leo.bac*
                                Tobacco
  Herbicides
     Paraquat
     Diuron
     Si?nazine
Herbicides
  Simazine
  Aminotriazole
  Paraquat
  Diuron
  Dichlobenil
Herbicides
  Pebulate
  Diphenaraid
   Insecticides
     Kelthane
     Ethior.
     Az i r.-'r. os met ry 1
     Tetradifon
   Fungi ci fles
     Copper
            a hydroxide
            ophenyl
      phe.aate
 Insecticides
   Guthion
   Parathion
   Carbaiyl
   Imidan*
   Oxythioquinox (BSl)
 Fungicides
   Zineb
   Metiram (BSl)
   Folpet
   Ziram
 Insecticides
   Endosulfan
   Diazinon
   Carbaryl
   Parathion
   Methocyl
   Malathion
   Disulfoton

 Fungicides
   Maneb'
   Ferbam
   folyram
   Zineb
  !_/ DCS;, not include Alaska and Hawaii.

  Source:  Unpublished  data  U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ.  Ees.  Serv.   Based
           vn survey of State Fxperiment  Station  specialists  in major
           -.-.reducing States.   Number  of States  reporting:   cotton,  6;
           corn, 8; soybeans, JCV-citrus, 5; apples,  6;  and tobacco, 5.

-------
Table 10 .--Leading insecticides used on
    selected classes of livestock,
        United States, 1970 I/
          Cattle
            Coumaphos
            Toxaphene
            Ciodrin
            Malathion
            Lindane

          Hogs
            Lindane
            Toxaphene
            Malathion
            Ronnel
            Carbaryl
            Coumaphos

          Poultry
            Malathion
            Carbaryl
            Coumaphos
            Nicotine sulfate
  IL/  Does  not  include Alaska and Hawaii.

  Source:   Unpublished  data U.S. Dept. Agr.
           Econ.  Bes. Serv.  Based on survey
           of  State  Experiment Station
           specialists  in major producing
           States.   Number of States reporting:
           cattle, 12;  hogs, 10; and poultry, 13-
             131

-------
Table -U—Use of principal kinds of wood preservatives, United States, 1965-69
Kind of
preservative







Total 	




Pentachloro-
Tanalith*
(Wolman Salts*) 	
Chroraated zinc
chloride 2/3/ 	
Acid copper

Chromated copper


m«.J-^T

'
1965 !
•

1,000
gallons

1 kli "5Q7
•*.'+'+, yy i
60.321
1^,969

219,68?


1,000
pounds

20,160 I/
3,727
2,125
1,685
2,018
1.8U3
70^ I/

-^ r,l"^

1966 •

1,000
gallons

1 c.o 077
j-xj >j i 1
72,61*9
18,679

2UU,705


1,000
pounds

26,058
1*,660
1,232
1,663
2,2UO
2,lf37
6801/

-%O *^F->/\
Jw • V i W

.
1967
:
Liquids
1,000
gallons

1 U7 SQli
J-^ 1 , X.7^
73,661
20,082

21*1,337

Solids
1,000
pounds

2lf,8l^
3,922
1,66k
1,U05
1,1*19
2,330
1,281 I/

*r o-,f- * t
'lU.^T J "W

!
1968
'

1,000
gallons

1?6 7QQ
73,588
20,1*69

230,856


1,000
pounds

26,389
2,683
1,526
1,139
1,288
3,215
l,55l* I/

"5 / • ( Vt

*
1969

1,000
gallons

128,226
68,071
19,6l8

215,915


1,000
pounds

25,5^2
3,067
1,38U
872
1,^72
U,668
1,050

^O ~>r- r-
"iU + \JJJ

*  Registered, U. S. Patent Office.   Trade names  used because  they are
widely known, and the products are complex mixtures.
  I/  Revised..
  2j  Includes copperized.
      Includes fire retardant use.
      Includes Boliden Salts*.
I
  Source:  Agri. .(Jtaoil.  and Conserv.  Serv.  (9)
                                132

-------
        Tatle 13—Use of mercury in pesticide  manufacture,
                      United States, 1946-69
V
Year


1946....
IS&T ....
1948....
1949....
1950....
1951....
1952....
1953....
1954....
1955 	
1956....
1957....
1958....
1959...
I960. ...
1961...
1962...
1963...
1964...
1965...
1966...
1967 ...
1968...
1969...


Pounds
238,184
426,892
535,648
354,692
342,304
588,012
447,336
527,136
581,476
562,324
754,680
481,612
476,520
243,352
22o . 024
19'i ,332
324,216
192,888
23t% 944
236,816
180,424
£co . v$eL
260,680
204,364
Pa
Antifouling
Pounds
75,544
57,760
95,696
143,108
238,108
190,000
89,528
49,780
38,912
55,024
38,836
43,168
56,924
75,468
103,360
69,540
9,424
19,152
4l,572
19,380
10,640
11,5^2
29,792
18,544
dnts
Mildew proofing
Pounds
!/
i/
!/
i/
i/
i/
!/
i/
i/
i/
i/
i/
i/
191,596
217,436
391,096
346,104
486,628
453,644
624,036
629,280
533,976
773,224
720,936

Paper and Pulp
Pounds
2/
2/
2/
I/
2/
2/
2/
2/
2/
i/
2/
2/
2/
331,360
264,556
235,144
197,600
215,156
163,248
47,044
46,512
33,896
31,692
42,408
Tr->4- QT

Pounds
313,728
484,652
631,344
497,800
580,412
778,012
536,664
576,916
620,388
617,348
793,516
524,780
533,444
841,776
811,376
890,112
877,344
913,824
897,408
927,276
866. As A
863,056
1,095,388
986,252
I/ Not available.
2/ Included with Agricultural.

Source:  Agri. Etabil.  and Conserv.  Serv.  (9)
                               133

-------
      Table 13—Producers'  shipments  of  copper sulfate by end uses,
                         United States,  1960-69
Year

I960 . . .
1961. . .
1962 . .
1963. . .
1961*. . .
1965. . .
1966 . . .
1967. . .
1968. . .
1969 . . .

! Total
: 1,000
- pounds
108, 5UU
.: 93,088
.: 80,661*
82 , 376
.: 87,368
.: 91,280
103,632
.: 81,288
.: 87,296
99,112

Agricultural
1,000
pounds
33 280
35,576
35.560
35,216
1*1 , 8l6
1*7.272
U1.50U
33,992
37.192
1+2,072

Industrial
1,000
pounds
1*0 02l+
1*0,01*8
1*0 768
1*1*. 256
1*3.1*1*0
1*0,381*
5l*,9]2
1*5.392
1*8, 10l*
52,1*16

Other,
mostly
export
1,000
pounds
35,21*0
17,1*61*
1*, 336
2,90U
2,112
3,62l*
7,216
1,90U
2,000
l*,62l*

Proportion
to
agri culture
Percent
30.7
38.2
1*1*. 1
1*2.8
1*7.9
51.8
1*0.0
1*1.8
1*2.6
1*2.1*

Source:  Agri.  Stabil.  and  Conserv. Serv. (9)
                                  134

-------
Table ]..li -- Pesticides Currently Employed in Mosquito Control."
(Stale or KXOI regulations may impose certain restrictions on the use of these compounds-
prices.) lmllvlclual should consuU '""I ^ state authorities on the accept use
Type
Application Tox ant'

malathion
E
S


D

U

A BHC


DDT
s

p dieldrin

R




it- F-
ETT
U
S M
II
j-j Q dichlorvos
UA
A
A N
L T


G carbaryl

Off
S
O U P
UNA fenthinn'
TD C
*J \~*
Df*t
E
O A
OPS
R P P malathion

L R
I A
E Y
D
naled






Dosage
Mg./sq. ft.
100 or MQ








25 or 50


100 or 200


25 or 50









1 dispenser per
1000 cu. ft.



1 dispenser per
catch basin.
Lb./acre
0.2-1.0




0.01-0.1





0.075-0.2





0.02-0.1






Remarks
For use in United States as
an interior house treatment.
— Particularly persistent on
wood surfaces and remains
effective for 3 to 5 mon:hs.
FOR USE IN OVER
SEAS ZONES AS A STA\D-
AHD APPLICATION FOR
TREATING THE INTERIOR
OF HOMES IN MALARI-
OUS ARK AS. A suspension
formulation is mosl effec-
tive. Dosage and cycle of
— retreatment depend on the
vector, geographic area, and
transmission period. DDT
and dieldrin are effective
for 6 to 12 months, BHC for
3 months. When the vectors
are resistant to these or-
ganochlorine compounds,
malathion should be used.
Its efficacy is 2.5 to 3
months.
Formulated in resin. Sus-
pend . from . ceiling or roof
supports. Provides 21/?. to
3Vz months of satisfactory
— kills of adult mosquitoes.
Do not use where infants,
ill, or aged persons are con-
fined or in areas where food
is prepared or served.
— Suspend dispenser 12" below
catch basin cover.
Dosage based on estimat-
ed swath width of 300 ft.
Apply as mist or fog during
the dusk to dawn period.
Mists are usually dispersed
at rates of 1 to 25 gal per
rr;'.c at :; vehicle :,--^C. ..: Z
rnph. Fogs are applied at a
rate of 40 gal/hr. dispersed
— from a vehicle moving at this
speed; occasionally at much
higher rates and greater
speeds. Finished formula-
tions contain from 0.5 to
8 oz./gal. actual insecticide
in oil, or, in the case of the
nonthermal fog generator,
in a water emulsion. Dusts
also can be used. For ground
ULV application1*, technical
grade malathion is dispersed
at a rate of 1 to 1.5 fl. oz./
min. and a vehicle speed of
5 mph or at a rate of 2 to 3
fl. oz./min.-and 10 mph.
(Continued on next p.Tgc;
135

-------
Table Ut    (continued)
 Application
    Typo
                 Toxicant^
                                  Docaj!o
                                                           Remarks
                                 Lb./ucre   '     Apply by ground equipment
               Abate            0.05-0.1         or airplane  i   rates  up  to
                                                 10 quails of f  -mulation p?r
                                                 acre  ckpendi ;g  upon  con-
                                                 centration  employed.  Ute
               Dursban"       0.0125-0.05       oil  or water  emul';k-:v for-
               EPN«         .    0.075-0.1         mulation  in r.retis witb-rnin-
                                                 imum  vegetative  covt-r.
               fenthion'-"''      •- 0.02-0.1         Where vegetative   cover  is
                                                 heavy, use granular fonnii-
                                              — latioris.   DO  NOT  AK*JLY
               malathion         0.2-0.5         PAHATHION  IN   UKBA.;-;
                                                 AREAS.  For jut-hatch treat-
                                                 ment  on  an  area bus:.-., use
               m&thoxy-         0.05-0.2         methoxychlor  (1  to  5  lb./
                chlor                            A.). Oi'goHophosphonis com-
                                                 pounds   such  as   Dursban
               parathion'          0.1           and  fcnthion  provide  yiro-
               (elhyl                            longed effectivenes.-. in  con-
               or methyl)                        laminated water at dosages
                                                 5  to 10 times  those  li.sto.-a.

                                                 Apply paris  green  pellets
                           ~       0.75        _(5%)  at  rate  of 15  Ib./A.
               paris green                        with  ground  equipment or
                                                 airplane.

                                                 Apply to cover  water  sur-
                                                 face  in catch  basins  or  at
      E                      •                   a  rate of  15 to 20 gal. /A.  in
                              2to20gal./A.   — open  water  courre.s. V.'i.'h a
              -fuel oil-                          spreading agent at  a rale of
                                                 0.5%,  the volume can  be re-
                                                 duced to 2 to 3 gal./A.

• When insecticides arc to be applied to crop  lands, pasture, rar.se  land, or uncultivated
 lands,  consult  agricultural authorities  as to  acceptable compounds  and Epplicatlon
 procedures.
' Other compounds, such as Thanitc.  Letha:ie 304, propoxur and ronncl may have  uses In
 certain of Ihe categories rnentionca. Jf so, follov^ label directions.
c For use by trained niosquuo control personnel oniy.
* Adhere strictly to label specifications and dircc'icns for yse.
•Not to be applied to waters containing valuab!c  fish, crabs, or shrimp.
'Label requires a 3-week interval between applications,  cNec|.it for top, treatments.
     L


     A


     R


     V


     I


     C.


     I
Source:   Pest Control  (18)
                            136

-------
 Table J j .-Orncnophosphorus Insecticides for Use in Fly Control.'
(State rccuta+'aW rtvy Impose rcrtnin rfistrlctlons on the use of those toxicants in cinlrlcs
or  at otluv afKC>*-iC utcs; therefore, the  Individual should he  certain that his usnfc
conforms vslM. lowJ rr^ti ictlons.)
     Type
  Application
  Toxicant
                              Formulation
                                                     Remarks
      R


      E


      S


      I


      D


      U


      A
                           For 50 gallons of
                            finished spray,
                             add water to:

              IMazinon     2 gal. 25% EC
                           or 16# 25% WP
               dimethoate   1 gal. 50% EC
Gardona     8# 50% WP or
             6# 75% WP or
             2gal.2#/gal.EC
malathion    2-4.5 gal."55%
             EC or 32-64#
             25% WP
naled
              ronnel
               fcnthion
1 gal. 50% EC
             2 gal. 25% EC
             or 16 # 25 % WP
             0.7-1.3 gal.
             93% EC
  Maximum  strength  permit-
  ted  1%. Labeled for use in
  dairy barns, milk rooms, and
  food-handling   establish-
  ments,   but   not  poultry
  houses.

  - Maximum  strength  permit-
  ted  1%. Can be  used  in
  dairy  barns  (except  milk
  rooms), meat processing
  plants, and poultry houses.

  - Maximum  strength  permit-
  ted  2%. Labeled for use in
  dairy  barns  but not poul-
  try houses.

— Maximum  strength  permit-
  tod  5%. Labeled for use in
  dairy barns, poultry houses,
  meal  pocking plants,  pre-
  mium  grade material accept-
  ed for  use in  milk rooms
  and food-handling plants.

— Maximum  strength  permit-
  ted  1%. For  use in  dairy
  abrns  (except .milk  rooms),
  in  food-handling  establish-
  ments'",  and   in  poultry
  houses.

— Maximum  strength  permit-
  ted  1%. For  use in  dairy
  barns,   milk   rooms,   food
  processing  plants, and poul-
  try houses.

— Maximum  strength  permit-
  ted  1.5%. Not to be  used in
  dairy batns, poultry houses,
AVOID CONTAMINATION OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL FOOD AND WATER
  CONTAINERS. DO NOT TREAT MILK ROOMS OR FOOD PROCESSING
AREAS' WHILE IN OPERATION. REMOVE ANIMALS FROM STRUCTURE
       DURING SPRAY OPERATION WHEN LABEL SO ADVISES.
I
M
P
R
E
G
N
A
T
E
D




C
O
R
D







Diazinon
and
parathion








To be prepared
by experienced
formulators only.





Install at rate of 30 linear
feet of cord per 100 square
feet of floor area. Accepted
for use in dairies and food
processing plants'1 but not
in poultry houses. Handle
and install cords per manu-
facturer's instructions.


                                                   (Continued on next page)
                                137

-------
 Table
(cor- inued)
T. p*?
AritiUcntion






••B -- - •'

A

I
T





OA
A
TT p
u \,f
T E
D
O S
O P
P. R
A
Y"

I.
R
T
JL
I
T->
E



loxic.'int
Diazinon




. dichlorvos



malalhion
nalcd
ronnel
trichlorfon

Dia/inon4
fenfhion
dichlurvos

dirnelhoate"


malathion

nalod

Diczinon
dichlorvos

dimethoate


malathion


ronnel

Formulation
]# 25% \VP
plus 2 •!:,'; sugar;
2 fl. o/.. 25% 'EC
plus 3# ::ugar in
3 gal. of water.


3-6 fl.-oz. 10%
EC plus 3#
sugur in 3 gal.
water.
2# 257o WP
plus 23# sugar.
1.0 fl. o;;. 50%
EC phis 2.5#
sugar in 2.5 gal.
water.
2 pt. 25% EC
plus 3#.sugar in
3 gal. water.
1# 50% SPplus
4# sugar in 4
gal. water.
11 gal. 25% EC
in 34 c;a). \vater.
6 gul. 50% EC in
44 gal. water.
3 or 6 gai. 50%
EC in 50 gal.
water.
5 gal. 55%FCin
41 gal. wster
1.5 gal. 65% EC
in 00 gal. water.
111. 02. .25% EC
to i gal. of
water.
2 fl. oz. 10% EC
to 1 gal. of
water.
0.5 pt. 43% EC
to 2.5 p.al. of
water.-
5fl. o/,. 55% F,C
to 3 K«il. of
water.
1 pt. 25% EC to.
3 Eal. of water.'
Remarks
Apply 3-4 oz. (dry) or 1;3
gal. twet) per 11)00 sq. ft. in
areas of high fly concentra-
tion. Repeat 1 to 6 times
per week as requited. Avoid
application of bail to dirt^ar
litter. ;,
The use of permanent bait
stations will prolong the ef-
ficacy of each treatment.

These toxicants are avail-
able as commercial baits la-
beled for use in dairies and
in food processing plants".
None of these baits should
be employed inside homes
nor should Diazinon and
triehlorfon be used in poul-
try houses.
DO NOT CONTAMINATE
FEED OH WATERING
TTiOUGHS.
— Apply 15 gal. per mile.

— Apply 15 gal. per mile.

— A-pply 20 or 10 gal. per mile.


— Apply 20 gal. per mile.

— Apply 15-20 gal. per mile.

Apply 7-14 gal. per 1000 sq.
It. as a coarse spray. Rcpoat
as necessary, usually every
10 days or less. For chicken
droppings, use only where
birds are caged. Diazinon is
not labeled for use in poul-
try houses.

AVOID CONTAMINATION
Ol- i'J'^L) OK VV/Vij^rt, AiNjJ
DRIFT OF SPRAY ON
ANIMALS.

* Foi information on chemicals to be used against livestock and crop pests and for their
 residue tolerances oi> crops, consult your State  Agricultural Experiment Station ot Ex-
 trpsion Service.
*» Jnriucics dairies, milk rooms, restaurants, canneries, food stores «md warehouses, and
 sinnk i  C'.'l.'tbllsK -I'.'nts.
* Based on swa ,h width ot 200 it.
*NoV swei'ical.'y labeled for outdoor space applications.
  Source:    Pest  Control (l8)
                                   138

-------
           Table 1^—Quantity and cost  of pesticides  used in  forest  insect  control programs, "by kinds,  United
                                               States,  fiscal years  1967-70
vo
Name of pesticide

nrvr - - - -.. --.








1967

555,695
88,632
72,587
7,482
6,597
4,786
753
22
: 1968 :
n J

436,275 3
81
75
8,601
13,769
230
1,909
262
4,240
1969
: 1970
: 1967
: 1968
: 1969
: 1 970
n/-.l 1 1-r.o 	 . 	
38,250
9,861
425
1,764
1,165
14,792
8
235,438
1,110
57
2,092
14,404
4
51,539
324,613
39,947
55,140
25,495
30,848
20,621
1,061
155

228,537
37
113
47,999
17,637
2,758
2,142
2,755
9,763

145,470
12,675
3,481
9,980
17,482
15,317
10

139,322
4,002
417
10,298
na
14,560
I/
I/
      I/ Not available.

      Source:  Agri.  Stabil.  and Conserv.  Serv.  (9)

-------
Table IT.—Extent aru cost of herbicides used to treat  forest  plantings,
             by region, United States, 1965 and 1968 I/
Regi on

Corn Belt and
Appalachian and
Mountain and Pacific _!/

1965
Acres j
treated j
1,000
acres
29
10
61
17
117

Cost 3/
1,000
dollars
436
48 .
878
129
1,491
' 1968
] Acres
treated
1,000
acres
49
43
356
15
463
y
Cost
1,000
dollars
645
305
5,063
157
6,170
  I/  Includes Hawaii, but not Alaska.
  2/  Preliminary.
  3/  Includes herbicide and charges  for application equipment  and

  Source:  (30) and unpublished data U.S.  Dept.  Agr. , Agr.  Fes.  Serv.,
   Econ. Res. Serv., and Fed. Exten.  Serv.
                              140

-------
    Table 18.—Quantities of pesticides used and acres treated for specified purposes
          with selected herbicides by Government agencies, United States, 19&9
Purpose and agency



Timber Improvement programs
Dept. of Agriculture

Range land Improvement program?)

Dept. of Agriculture
Dept« of Interior
Dept. of Defense

Rights«of-way Maintenance

Dept. of Agriculture
Dept. of Interior
Dept. of Dcfnese
TVA

Watershed Maintenance

Dept. of Interior
Dept. of Defense
TVA

Witchweed Control

Dept. of Agriculture
Total-


: 2,
: 1,000
: pounds
: 	
*
: 424
*
t
•
: 233
: 450
j 100
j
:
*
*
: 12
U-D ':

:
;
s
:
t
t
«
.
•
•
•
3
x
*
*
t
*
•
: 1.5:
: 300
» 934^
I
t
j
: 60
: 400
:
:
i
t
t
t
•
*
: 926 V:
:
:
j
: 176
: 21,56.5
:
•
*
:
*
*
*
•
*
•
t
i
1,000
acres


185



99
249
50



4
:
*
I
J
•
•
J
*
*
•
•
•
:
:
;
I
•
.
0.8:
100
:
99 j/:



78
200
40 1



176
1.141.


t
:
;
.
•
t
f
*
*
*
•
:
s
8
*
:
2.U.5-T
1,000 : 1,000
pounds : acres
\

221



86
26
—



5
1,5
200
761 ly



0.6
..
..




107



34
44
-•



2
: Picloram : Cacodylic Acid
:
J
j
!
t
X
:
*
i
:
:
i
t
•
*
4
1,000 :
pounds :
:,
:
t
•
»
I
1.7 :
— t
.. j
j
i
•
:
1,000 : 1,000 : 1,000
acres : pounds : acres
:, : 	
«
.- S 126 22
*
:
t
0.9 : ~ :
.. t — : —
.. j .. < ..
: j
t :
: t
.. « *. . ..
0.8: : — : — :
100
79



:
U
i
:
j
0.3,
~
..



.. j
:
540.1 : 288.
*
:
j
i
•
:
•
•
•
»
1:
•
t
10 j
72 y :
*
*
:
*
-• t
— :
.. j
t
j
j
:
*
U.7 t
:
t
10 : 30 : 1
17 l/j — : —
~* : t
: :
t :
.- • — :
... .. : .—
.. « .* :
t :
• •
: t
.. j — :
t t
10.9 : 156 t 23
* *
: :
I/  Represents total applied during period 1951-69 inclusive.
?/  Excludes usages by TVA.

Source:  Unpublished data,  For. Serv.

-------
    Teble 19,—Acreage of land-treated and cost per acre for lirush and weed control under Agricultural  Conservation,
                                         Program (ACP), United States, 1960-69
Brush control on raige Weed control on crop Bindweed control Riparian vegetation
and pastureland ' and pastureland on cropland control
Tear : : :
Extent : ACP cott Extent : ACP cost Extent ACP cost Extent : ACP cost
:per acre I/ :per acre I/ per acre I/ :per acre 2/
Acres Dollaa s Acres Dollars Acres Dollars Acres Dollars




10 :
*
1965 	 : 1,820,609
*
*

*
1969 	 * 1,911,662
3.1V
3.0^
3.1!)
3.08
3.13
3.11
3.28
3.^5
3.70
3.37
204,689
^c/cjj _ *f- i JL
226, 5^
263,101*.
J /
I/
63H,470
701,895
3.02
3.59
U.16
3.62
I/
I/
2.77
2.29
6,1480
9,031
3,767
3,075
2,073
!/
I/
I/
3/
50.90
1*9.68
50.72
52.23
I/
I/
I/
!/
5.3
10.0
71.0
9.0
3_/
I/
-3/
i/'
15.85
16.00
12.27
13.11
I/
I/
I/
I/
I/
I/  Represents about one-half of to;al cost.
2/  Represents about two-thirds of iotal cost,
^/  Not available.

Source:  Agri. Stabil. .and Consery. Serv. (9)

-------
Table 20.—Acreage of rangeland and pastureland treated for  control of brush
       under Agricultural Conservation Program, by States, 1966-69 I/-
State
•







Arizona 	 . . . •
Nebraska 	 ;


Utah 	 :



Washington 	 '•
North Dakota. . . :

Other 	 :
Total :
1966
Acres
1,162,537
1*0,806
98,836
76,760
72,11*3
67,730
1*7,783
1*2,930
. 1*9,930
30,006
1+6,519
11*, 365
38,876
9,l!tl*
5,836
I*, 569
5,971*
15,089
8,921
	 4uazz_
1,870,975
1967
Acres
1,161,305
99,1+81
116,638
123,561*
63,71+1*
66,961
58,1*71
61*, 506
66,981*
38,898
39,536
25,11+8
22,71*1+
16,370
10,279
7,371+
12,809.
11*, 81*3
9,552
45J26
2,06^,333
1968
Acres
1,098,61*2
60,91+6
166,172
96,601
62,835
53,1*81*
52,325
50,397
1*8,576
1*6,183
25,967
20,673
19,585
18,755
8,188
6,91+1+
1+.515
16,263
8,397
8,612
31 ,834
i,yio,89i
1969
Acres
l,ll+1+J387
150,61*9
109,095
96,918
71,557
i+9,586
1*8,21*1*
1*1,777
29,931
27,615
22,696
18,370
15,139
11,781*
10,525
8,812
8,655
6,519
5,979
5,1+72
27,952
1,911,662
Percentage
of U.S. total
in 1969
Percent
59.86
7-88
5.71
5.07
3.71*
2.59
2.52
2.19
1.57
1.1+5
1.19
0.96
0.79
0.62
0.55
0.1*6
0.1*5
0.31+
0.31
0.29
1.1*6
100.00
   I/  Practice B-3

   Source:  Agri. Stabil. and Conserv. Serv. (9)
                                     143

-------
 Table  21.—Major Federal agencies  requesting the
     use  of pesticides  in pest  control  programs
     and  acres  to be treated, January-August  1971
        Federal agency
Acres to be
 treated
U.S. Department of
 Agriculture	
U.S. Department of
 Interior	
U.S. Department of
 Defense	
Atomic Energy Commission--
Other Federal agencies l/-
  Total-
                                Million
                                 acres
  16.7

   2.7

   1.2
    .6
    .2

  21.4
  I/  Includes the District of Columbia,  General
Services Administration, National Institutes  of
Health, National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
International boundary Commission, Tennessee  Valley
Authority, Coast Guard, Federal Aviation  Administra-
tion, the Veterans Administration, and others.

  Source:  Unpublished data President's Cabinet
           Committee on the Environment,  Subcommittee
           on Pesticides.
                      144

-------
Table 22.—Important pesticides requested for
    •use and acres to be treated by Federal
         agencies, January-August 1971
Pesticide


o A n 	 	 	 _

MQlp,l 	 	 	 	


lorai 	 — - 	 — — -
Acres to be
treated
Million'
acres
9.5
6.0
.6
.5
.3
4.5
21.4
    Source:  Unpublished data, President's
             Cabinet Committee on the
             Environment, Subcommittee on
             Pesticides.
                   145

-------
  Table 23.--Acreage treated annually with selected herbicides
    for agricultural and nonagricultural uses,  United States
Type of use

Non agricultural
Turf - -- - - --

Government programs 3/
Qntrf- r\1- n 1 	 -
Tnt si - 	

2,4-D

56,893
1,200
3,000
1,142
5,342
62,235
• 2 4 5-T
• ^ >4>° *
Innn
,uuu
1,565
1,200
3,000
288
4,488
6,053
Picloram

acres — •
118
11
11
129
[Cacodylic
\ acid

101
23
23
124
_!/  Estimated use in 1966.
2J  Estimated use in recent years.
3/  Estimated use in 1969.

 Source:  Unpublished data, For.  Serv.
                            146

-------
     Table  2It.—Selected major insecticides  used on  crops by farmers,
                     by regions,  United States,  1966 I/
       Insecticides
  Active
ingredients
Percentage of
    total
AH insecticides
  Southeast	
  Delta States	
  Corn Belt	
  Southern Plains-
  Other regions	

    All regions	

Toxaphene

  Southeast	
  Delta States	
  Southern Plains-
  Applachian	
  Other regions	

    All regions	

DDT

  Southeast	
  Delta States	
  Southern Plains-
  Appalachian	
  Other regions—

    All regions—

Aldrin

  Corn Belt	
  Lake States	
  Other regions—

    All regions—
                                   Million pounds
   35.4
   21.8
   21.5
   16.0
   42.9

  137.6
   13.7
    7.2
    5.0
    2.5
    2.5

   30.9
   10.9
    7.1
    2.7
    1.8
    3.8

   26.3
   13.0
     .7
    1.1

   14.8
                        Percent
     25.7
     15.9
     15.6
     11.6
     31.2

    100.0
     44.3
     23.3
     16.2
      8.1
      8.1
    100,0
     41.5
     27.0
     10.3
      6.8
     14.4

    100.0
     87.9
      4.7
      7.4

    100.0
                                  147

-------
  Table 21+.--• Selected major insecticides used on crops by  farmers,
                   by regions, United States, 1966 I/—continued
Insecticides

Parathion






Methyl Parathion






Active
ingredients
Million pounds

9 9
1 ^
1 L
1 9
9 1
8A

0 1
9 9
i q
A Q
Q A

Percentage of
total
Percent

26 2
17 9
16 6
14 3
25 0
100 0


27 5
03 «
10 0
100 0

!_/  Does not include Alaska and Hawaii.


Source:  Econ. lies.  Serv. (7)
                              148

-------
      Table 25.— Selected major herbicides used on crops by farmers,
                       by regions, United States, 1966 I/
         Herbicides
  Active
ingredients
Percentage of
    total
All herbicides
  Corn Belt	
  Northern Plains-
  Pacific	
  Lake States	
  Other regions	

    All regions	

2,U-D

  Northern Plains-
  Corn Belt	
  Pacific	
  Mountain	
  Southern Plains-
  Other regions—

    All regions—

Atrazine

  Corn Belt	
  Appalachian	
  Lake States	
  Northern Plains-
  Northeast	
  Other regions—

    All regions—

Trifluralin

  Delta States	
  Corn Belt	
  Southeast	
  Southern Plains-
  Other regions—

    All regions—
                                  Million pounds
   35-5
   Ik.9
   Ik.I
   11.6
   36.3

  112. k
   10. k
    9.8
    6.2
    k.2
    3-6
    5.3

   39-5
   10.0
    2.5
    M
    2.3
    2.3
    1.7

   23.5
    1,6
    i.o
     .8
     .6
    1.2

    5-2
                         Percent
31.6
13.3
12.5
10,
32.
      .3
      .3
  100.0
   26.3
   2k.8
   15.7
   10.7
    9.1
   13. k

  100.0
   1(2.6
   10.6
   20.0
    9.8
    9.8
    7-2

  100.0
   30.8
   19.2
   15.U
   11.5
   23.1
  100.0
  I/   Does  not  include Alaska and Hawaii.

  Source:   Econ.  Hes.  Serv.  (7)
                                   149

-------
      Table 26.—Selected major fungicides used on crops "by fanners,
                    by regions, United States, 1966 I/
         Fungicide
  Active
ingredients
Percentage of
    total
All fungicides
  Northeast	
  Corn Belt	
  Southeast	
  Lake States	
  Appalachian	
  Pacific	
  Other regions—

    All regions--?-

Zineb

  Corn Bolt	
  Northern Plains-
  Northeast	
  Southeast	
  Sputhern Plains-
  Appalachian	
  Other regions—

    All regions —

Cap tan

  Northeast	
  Appalachian	
  T,l.% r*. r-^~.~
  Other regions---

    All regions---

Copper compounds

  Southeast	
  Pacific	
  Southern Plain:;-
  Appalachian	
  Other regions---

  ^ All region^---
                                     Million
                                      pounds
   6.8
   5.3
   5.2
   3.4
   3.3
   2.8
   3.7

  30.5
   3.4
    .6
    .6
    .5
    .2

   6.8
   2.5
   1.7
   i ,5
     .8

   6.6
   3.1
   1.0
     .7
     .6
     .8

   6.2
   V   Does  not.  include  Alaska and Hawaii.

   Source:   Econ.  Fes. Serv.  (7)   -
                       Percent
      22.3
      17.4
      17.1
      11.1
      10.8
       9.2
      12.1

     100.0
      50.0
      11.8
      10.3
       8.8
       8.8
       7.4
       2.9

     100.0
      37.9
      25.8
      2/t  2
      12.1

      100.0
       50.0
       16.1
       11.3
        9.7
       12.9
      100.0

-------
.Table  27.—Cash  expenditures  for farm pesticides,  by States, 1955 and  1970 I/
             State  and  Region
         North Atlantic:
           Main..1	 —
           New !!;-.••[!:,.lire
           Vermont
           Massetdr.'i-etts
           Rhode  Island	
           Coir.iecticul--
           New York
           New Jersey
           Pennsylvania
         East North Central:
           Ohio
           Indiana
           Illinoi s--
           Mi chi^an
           Wisconsin
         West North Central:
           Minnesota	
           Iowa-.
           Missouri	
           North  Dakota
           South  Dakota
           Nebraska---	-
           Kansas
         South Atlantic:
           Delc'Viii-e	•
           Mar/land
           Virj-.-ni a
           West Virginia
           North  Carolina
           South  Carolina
           Georgi a
           Fl:-,-id3
         South Central:
           Kentucky--
           Tennessee	*•
           Alabama	-
           Mississippi
           Av'railsjx:
           LoiiijJoiia	•
           Oklahoma
           Texas
         Western:
           Montana
           Idaho
           Wyoming
           Colorado
           New .Mexico
           Arizona
           Utah--
           Nevada
           Washington
           Oregcn	-
           Call foriia

              Uni tcJ States-
 1955
 1970 2/
                                                      -Thousand dollars-
 3,203
   412
   688
   916
   152
   8/3
 9,179
 2,960
 6,206

 4,368
 2,113
 2,671
 6,557
 2,246

 2,413
 2,906
 1,858
 1,771
 1,832
 1,544
 1,332

   502
 1,308
 3,988
 1,160
 11,092
 5,749
 8,434
 11,508

 2,721
 1,533
 3,216
 9,451
 f. or*'.
 5^974
 2,715
 11,436

 2,561
 1,785
   354
 2,180
 1,118
 6,021
   S19
   158
 5,658
 4,810
 36,145

204,700
 9,001
 2,064
 1,966
 4,717
   546
 3,051
24,364
 8,195
17,129

22,264
23,512
40,156
39,290
15,022

24,350
40,263
19,151
 8,195
 8,583
19,420
15,175

 2,485
 4,819
16,377
 3,810
34,898
17,656
21,096
57,626

15,948
12,194
15,285
26,495
28.754
18,162
10,840
56,421

 7,412
 9,559
 3,823
13,313
 7,506
11,524
 3,366
 1,458
22,329
14,325
114,741

898,636
          ""!_/   Does  not include livestock  sprays  and  disinfectants ,
         United States  they  were  $143 million in both  1955 and  1970.
           2j   ~-ri;limir.ary.
           SOUTC-T-:   Farmer Cooperative Serv.  JL51
                             For the

-------
N)
                              Table 28.—Estim-.ted agreage  of  crops harvested and treated  with herbicides and insecticides
                                                           5  I-ake States, 1969 and 1970 I/
5 Lake
States

Illinois—-
Indiana 	
Michigan 	
Minnesota —
Wisconsin —
Total 	
Illinois—-
Indiana 	
Michigan 	
Minnesota —
Wisconsin —
Total 	
Corn
Harvested
' Smal grains 2/
Treated
Harves .ed
Treated
Soybeans

Harvested ° Treated
; Hay
Harvested

Treated
Other
Harvested
I/
Treated
Total
Harvested
I/
Treated

1969
9,980
It ,901
1,662
l*,939
2,666
2l*,ll*8

10,379
5,195
1,778
5,285
2,71*6
25,383
8,1*33
It, 267
1,1*1*5
3,765
2,055
19,965

8,732
it, 1*61*
1,587
1*,216
2,390
21,1*39
2,0!6
1,221
1,1*9
1*,?35
1,7 )!*
11,135

l!o3
1,07
l/i 77
10J78
21
1*8
361*
2,991*
370
3,797

56
50
385
2,732
1*20
3,61*3
6,730
3,311
511*
3,068
171*
13,797

6,865
3,311
521*
3,129
153
13,982
It ,711
2,280
292
1,706
87
9,076

1* ,911*
2,350
330
1,936
77
9,607
I,2lt3
956
1,1*85
3,336
It ,022
ll,0l»2
1970
1,260
932
1,1*25
3,231
It, 016
10,861*
75
117
250
1*8
20
510

56
61
2l*2
20
22
1*01
671
7
678

597
1*07
9
1,013
1*93
3
1*96

1*90
280
3
773'
19 ,969
10,389
5,1*81
16,328
8,653
60,820

20,1^9
10,531
16^918
8,701
61,720
13,21(0
6,712
2,81*1*
8,513
2,535
33,81.1*

13,808
6,92;
3,031*
2,912
35,863
       I/  Includes  corn,  soybeans, oats, wher t,  barley,  rye, and hay in each state.   Also  includes dry beans in Michigan,  tobacco  in Wisconsin, and
     flax in Minnesota.
       2/  Includes  oats,  wheat, barley and r;'e.
       3/  Includes  dry beans  in Michigan, fl jc in Minnesota, and tobacco in Wisconsin.
      Source:  Wise.  Dept.  Agr.  (35),  (36)

-------
                    Table  29-—Estimated  acreage  of  crops treated with pesticides by type of control
                                              5  Lake  States, 1969 and 1970 I/
5 Lake
States



Minnesota 	
Wisconsin 	
rn-j.0i 	

Weeds
1969 ;

lU,870
6,538
2,520
9,155
2,1*39
35,522
•'
1970 ;

lU,72U
6,781
2,805
10,536
3,123
37,969
• insects
1969 !

] Diseases
1970 ;

7,U25 6,313
1,963 2,021*
637 690
1,521 1,181
821 779
12,367 10,987
1969
- -1 non

126
ho
59
59
36
320
• 1970


228
196
16
112
95
6>*7
; Other
; 1969 ; 1970

20 6
1* 2
3
3
30 8
;
: 1969

22,kkl
8,5^5
3,216
10,738
3,299
J+8,239
Total
! 1970

21,271
9,003
3,511
11,829
3,997
1*9,611
  !_/  Includes corn, soybeans, oats, wh^at,  barley,  rye,  and hay in each state.  Also includes dry beans in Michigan,
tobacco in Wisconsin and flax in Minnesota.   Acres treated more than once are counted for each treatment.

  Source:  Wise. Dept. Agr. (35), (36)

-------
       Table 30.—Acreage c,'"  corn treated with insecticides,  5  Lake  States,  1970
Insecticio.e



Ph nr-pi •(• P-




All ins6C"tici do s

Illinois


~

-------
   Table 31.	Acreag-   of Small grains treated with insecticides, 5 Lake  States,  1970
Insecticide





Illinois : Indiana

- 7
11 8
- 1 S
11 30
: Michigan : Minnesota : Wisconsin

1 liQ —
-LH^ —
29 — 1
10 19 7
188 19 8
5 Lake
States

156
51
256
Source:  Wise. Dept. Agr- (35)
                                         155

-------
       Table  32-—Acreage of hay treated with insecticides,  5 Lake  States,  1970
Insecticide
Diazinon and

Malathion and



Illinois : Indiana

— — 	 — 	
10 12
_ q

— 5
35 35
^5 55
: Michigan : Minnesota : Wisconsin

	 1,000 acres 	 	
hk
57 -- 3
U8
71 1 1
220 1 **
; 5 Lake
\ States

66
63
53
1U3
325
Source:  Wise. Dept.  Agr.  (35)
                                     156

-------
         Table  33.— Acreage of corn treated with herbicides,  5  Lake  States,  1970
Herbicide I/









Illinois : Indiana : Michigan : Minnesota : Wisconsin


7,256 3,766 1,182 3,075 1,985
2,067 5Ql+ 	 1,^32 31
^30 19k 311 1,113 k71
1,2^3 638 llU 38k k8
691 3Ul 85 885 77
PR1^ 1 kk 1 f\f>
2j 2j 2j 2j 2j
9,767 5,0-88 1,700 5,576 2,615
_: 5 Lake
; States

17,26U
2,079
595
2/
24,7^6
  I/  Includes preemergence and postemergence treatment.
  2]  Small acreages were also treated vith other undesignated herbicides.
  3/  Individual items ac.d to more than total because some acres received more than one
treatment.

  Source:  Wise. Dept. Agr. (35)
                                          157

-------
      Table 3^.—Acreage of soybeans treated with herbicides,  5 Lake  States,  1970
Herbicides I/







All herbicides 	
Illinois : Indiana : Michigan

.uuu
9 ^^^ 71 1 Ad

lilig pgo o-i


U ,675 1,276 276
: Minnesota : Wisconsin


1 199 22
3^9 12
oon 18
on 1Q

1,909 71
; 5 Lake
\ States


u 571*
1 60U
.1,088
661
280
8,207
I/  Includes preernergence and postemergence treatment.




Source:  Wise. Dept. Agr. (35)
                                      158

-------
    Table 35.—Acreage of small grains treated with herbicides,  5 Lake States, 1970
Herbicide I/
WPP A — -. 	 	



./oners 	 	 	

Illinois :

10
18
10
7
H5
Indiana : Michigan

jUUU
87
108
£o
	 oy
23 U
23 268
: Minnesota

acres 	
1,217
1,131
326
55
2,729
: Wisconsin

lUU
197
69
2
412
| 5 Lake
States

1,1*58
1,^5U
. klk
91
3,^77
!_/  Includes preemergence and postemergence treatment.




Source:  Wise. Dept. Agr. (35)
                                        159

-------
   Table  36.--Acreage  of  crops  treated  for
     insect  and weed control  in selected
             states, 1964  and 1969
State I/






Oh T n- 	 	 	








Acreage treated for--
Insects
1964 3/]1969 A
i nnn

386 480
182 126
468 362
441 536
180 789
223 1,127
201 996
95 1,343
149 4,556
55 4,032
403 1,238
134 368
76 507
2,993 16,460
Weeds 2/
j 1964 ; 1969


773 765
99 160
771 734
1,786 1,841
1,738 1,997
5,386 6,555
2,392 2,737
3,021 4,364
5,502 9,278
4,998 7,766
1,829 3,367
6,902 6,881
3,448 3,249
38,645 49,694
  If  States for which 1969 information was
available, Sept. 1971.
  2/  Acres of crops and brush or pasture treated
for weeds.
  3/  Acres treated for insect and disease control,
  4/  Acres treated for insect control  only.

  Source:  Bureau of Census (25)
                       160

-------
Table 37.--Quantities of selected kinds of pesticides by users, Utah, 1969 and 1970
Year and pesticide


1969
Chlorinated hydro-


Organophosphates 	
Other insecticides--
Total insecticides


M"j C f*Ci 1 1 Qn^fMlC—... ••»_

Total for 1969—
1970
Chlorinated hydro-
i
c a i u on s 	
Organophosphates 	
Other insecticides--
Total insecticides
H o T*l"t "i r* i rl o C •» —

\t* f 11 r\ t^f^ C
Ml 5CC 1 lculGOU-3~* " — — — -
Total for 1970--
Agricultural:




XT
>^ i
139
9
179
,
JHD
, J

531


7 17

-------
Table 38---Quantities of insecticides
  used for residential insect control,
            California, 1970
        Insecticide
Quantity
  used
 Chlordane	
 Malathion	
 Carbaryl	
 Lead  arsenate  (standard
  and  basic)	
 Methyl bromide	
 Carbon tetrachloride	
 Diazinon	
 Others	
   Total-
 1,000
 pounds

   78
   60
   54

   38
   36
   21
   20
  104

  411
   Source:   Calif. Dept. Agr.  (4)
             162

-------
Table 39.--Quantities of herbicides used
    for residential weed control,
           California, 1970
         Herbicides.
Quantity
  used
Borax and boric acid-
Sodium chlorate	
Ammonium sulfamate—
2,4-D	
Bromacil	
Simazine	
Others	
  Total-
 1,000
 pounds

 1,198
   525
   119
    59
    58
    41
   213

 2,213
  Source:  Calif. Dept. Agr. (4)
              163

-------
Table 40.--Quantities of insecticides used
      for structural pest control,
            California, 1970
        Insecticide
Quantity
  used
 Chlordane	
 Methyl bromide-
 Vikane	
 Aldrin	
 Diazinon	
 Dieldrin	
 Others	
   Total-
 1,000
 pounds

  551
  187
   76
   47
   30
   26
   63

  980
   Source:   Calif.  Dept. Agr.  (4)
              164

-------
         Table  4j.--Percentage  of  all  pesticide  sales reported in
             California that  were used  by  Government agencies
                                 in 1970
Kind of use
Vector
State
Other
All

and local roads 	


Type of pesticide
Insecticides

2.2
I/
2.5
4.7
: Herbicides
	 	 — -Percent

.3
5.0
6.1
11.4
Fungicides

I/
I/
.7
.7
Total
pesticides

1.3
1.3
3.0
5.6
I/  Less than O.C5 percent.

Source:  Calif. Dept. Agr. (4)
                                   165

-------
Table l^—Extent of custom application of chemical weed
  control materials, United States, 1959, 1962, 1965,
                        and 1968
       Year
 Percentage of treated acres
covered by custom application
                                     Percent

                                      26.6

                                      28.5

                                      3^.9

                                      31. U
Source:   (30) and unpublished data U.S. Dept.  Agr., Agr.
          Res. Serv. , Econ. Res. Serv. , and Fed. Exten.
          Serv.
                        166

-------
 'J>able U3---Percentage of expenditures for pesticides, by  form of application
                    and by crop,  United States,  1961+ and 1966  I/
Crop


Wheat 	


Other grain 5/6/ 	




Other field crops 5/6/ 	
Alfalfa 	
Other hay and forage 5/6/ 	




f








1964

Dust
; 1966
Form
of application
\ Granular
; 1964 ;
1966
Spray
1964 ;
1966
\ Other
; 1964 ;
11
1966

7
22
2
4
A/
i
12
15
A/
A/
29
2
4/
4
21
20
4
4
10
27
4/
i
14
2
9
3
2
1
J3/
3
8
36
2
1
2
5
4
8
1.1
3
4
14
6
5
34
1
2
A/
2
29
7
A/
A/
9
4
A/
I/
3
2
I/
4/
5
9
38 59
2 77
V 98
3 94
y
97
40 59
2 54
8 4/
3 _A/
16 61
. 1 75
1 A/
_3/ 95
24 75
24 75
3f 95
V 96
3/ 90
3 73
2 A/
3/ 34
17
75
58
88
97
94
99
100
57
79
53
95
83
96
98
95
70
67
99
96
96
67
80
100
76
A/
I/
24
A/
A/
i
19
A/
i
i
3
1
2
2
1
1
11
3
J3/
I/
1
1
2
1
I/
1
16
12
2
   I/ Does not include Alaska or Hawaii.   Excludes pesticides used for  controlling
rod"ents and treating  seeds, stored crops, storage buildings, and seedbeds and trans-
plants.
   2/ Includes fertilizer-pesticide mixtures and other forms.
   3/ Less than 0.5 percent.
   f*j Data not available  for 1964.
   5/ In 1964, rice was included with other grains; peanuts and sugarbeets with other
field crops;  and other hay and forage with pasture.
   6/ Crops included  in this category are listed in app. 2.


   Source:   Econ. Res.  Serv. (2)
                                   167

-------
 Table 44.-  Extent of preemergence and postemergence chemical weed
                control in the United States,  1968
Crop or area
Pnvn-



V n> p, o t - - -
Other small








Other vegetables --
Fruits and nuts —

Hnv


Forest plantin^.s--
Non crop land 	 --
Aquatic areas 	
Total or



Thousand acres
48,930
9,245
7,363
22,302
21,255
14,694
1,920
72
1,270
850
582
246
212
461
2,343
2,940
89
3,826
1,276
4,685
4,373
463
1,659
216
151,272
Percentage
Preemergence
Percent
51
58
43
75
4
11
2
33
72
77
40
32
73
70
73
76
67
32
25
8
14
8
8
43
of acres treated
Postemergence
Percent
49
42
57
25
96
89
98
67
28
23
60
68
27
30
27
24
33
68
75
92
100
86
92
92
57
Source:  Unpublished data U.S.  Dept.  Agr.,  Agr.  Res.  Serv.,  Econ.
         Res. Serv. and Fed.  Exten.  Serv.
                                168

-------
    Table 45.--Extent of preemergence or
     postemergence chemical weed control
         in the United States,  1968
State and region

New Hampshire 	











r\lSCOnbXIl- 	 — — --
Lake States 	
unio — 	 	
inoicuid-- 	 - — -—
i ninoib— - - — --
I ow a- — — — 	 — 	
Missouri 	

INOTtn IjaKOUa —
OOULU LiaKOla 	 — — -
Nebraska 	 — ---
Northern Plains-
Virginia 	
West Virginia 	
North Carolina 	
Kentucky 	
Tennessee 	 ~
Appalachian 	
Pre-
emergence
Post-.
emergence


80
63
33
64
59
33
47
47
22
33
74
46
'• 32
39
44
41
44
59
68
54
59
58
4
9
41
24
18
31
47
48
39
69
47
20
37
67
36
41
67
53
53
78
67
26
54
68
61
56
59
56
41
32
46
41
42
96
91
59
76
82
69
53
52
61
31
53
--Continued
169

-------
 Table  45.--Extent of preemergence or
   postemergence chemical weed control
in the United States, 1968--Continued
State and region
Soul!': Carolina 	






Delta States 	
TVi v a Q — — — _____„,,_.
Southern Plains-
Tn«>i ^ 	 	






\ <„. ,^ *- ,, ^ ,-,
*'* W L4.J 1 V- <^t J- J, 1 "" "" " ------





United States-
Pre- ;
emergence |
Post-
emergence


46
54
50
56
51
50
48
38
46
68
42
46
22
20
18
11
59
44
14
6
TO
6
30
37
35
60
25
43.
Source: Unpublished data U.S.
Agr. Res. Serv., Econ.
and Fed. Exten. Serv.
54
46
50
44
49
50
52
62
54
32
58
54
78
80
82
89
41
56
86
94
7S
94
70
63
65
40
75
57
Dept. Agr. ,
Res. Serv.
                 170

-------
    Table 45.--Seasonal distribution of use,  all pesticides,  by
                     major uses,  California,  1970
Use category
Farm uses:


Fruits § nuts (not
including citrus or

Deciduous fruit (not




Nonfarm uses:

Other government uses--



Quantity
used
I/
1,000 Ibs.
7,581
7,231
2,551
1,952
1,607
1,340
1,025
13,786
37,073
627
1,377
4,504
6,508
43,581
| Percentage
Jan.-
; Mar.

16.4
1.0
20.8
4.9
57.4
0.4
23.1
16.3
.8
21.0
18.2
15.6
16.3
\ Apr . -
] June

30.1
2.1
22.7
43.7
19.4
35.1
96.4
29.0
26.0
10.7
24.2
27.6
23.1
26.0
of total
; July-
.'. Sept.


29.3
54.4
30.9
11.3
11.1
61.1
3.6
29.6
33.1
82.6
25.2
33.6
34.3
33.1

Oct.-
Dec.

24.2
42.5
25.6
40.1
12.1
3.4
18.3
24.6
3.9
29.6
20.6
27.0
24.6
  I/  Does not include petroleum, boron, calcium hydroxide, diatomaceous,
earth, dormant oils, hydrated lime, lime sulfur, mineral oil, sulfuric
acid, buiiijuer oils anu 
-------
     Table 47.- Seasonal distribution of pesticide use,  by types,
                            California, 1970
Use r--it-jgory
Fungicides:
17 TV»IV.

Tn1* a 1 - - - - -
Herbicides :


Tnt a"!-— - 	 	
Insecticides :
C o -vm

Tr»1* a!-_ - - 	 — -.-
j
All pesticides :
U •-> -vm

Tnt" nl- 	 	

Quantity
used
!/
1,000 Ibs.
7,116
129
7,245
6,403
2,897
9,300
15,211
1.731
16,942
28,730
4,75?
33,487
\ Percentage
[ Jan.-
\ Mar .

29.9
1.8
29.4
16.3
19.7
17.4
8.6
10.8
8.9
16.6
15-6
16.3
Apr . -
' June

29.2
19.5
29.0
22.7
26,5
23.8
29.3
16.8
27.9
26.7
23.1
26.0
of total
I July-
; Sept.


13.5
33.9
13.9
19.6
32.4
23.5
46.7
37.3
45.8
33.2
34.3
33.1

; oct.-
; Dec.

27.4
44.8
27.7
41.4
21.4
35.3
15.4
35.1
17.4
23.5
27.0
24.6
  _!/  Does not  include petroleum, boron,  calcium hydroxide, diatomaceous
earth, dormant  oils, hydrated lime,  lime  sulfur, mineral oil, sulfuric
acid, summer  oils  and zinc.
                                  172
                                   MJ.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1972 514-147/53 1-3

-------