APTD-1334
ANALYSIS
OF FINAL STATE
IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS - RULES
AND REGULATIONS
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Programs
Stationary Source Pollution Control Programs
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
APTD-1334
ANALYSIS
OF FINAL STATE
IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS - RULES
AND REGULATIONS
by
L. J. Duncan
The Mitre Corporation
Contract Number: 68-02-0248
EPA Project Officer: Joseph Padgett
Chief, Systems Analysis
Staff, OD, SSPCP
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Programs
Stationary Source Pollution Control Programs
Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27711
July 1972
-------
The APTD (Air Pollution Technical Data) series of reports is issued by
the Office of Air Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies of
APTD reports are available free of charge to Federal employees, current
contractors and grantees, and non-profit organizations as supplies
permit from the Air Pollution Technical Information Center, Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
or may be obtained, for a nominal cost, from the National Technical
Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22151.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
The Mitre Corporation, Washington Operations, (as report No. MTR-6172,
Rev. 1) in fulfillment of contract No. 68-02-0248. The contents of
this report are reproduced herein as received from the contractor.
The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the
author and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency.
Office of Air Programs Publication No. APTD-1334
11
-------
FOREWORD
This paper was written to summarize the rules and regulations
found in State Implementation Plans submitted in response to the 1970
Clean Air Act. This work was performed under the direction of
Mr. Joseph Padgett, Chief, Systems Analysis Staff, Office of Air
Programs, Stationary Source Pollution Control Program. We wish to
thank Mrs. Josephine Cooper and the other EPA personnel for the
information and help they provided to us for this project.
Because this paper contains numerous lengthy tables which would
break up the text and make it difficult to follow, all tables and
their footnotes have been placed at the end of the paper. These
tables are part of the main paper, but were positioned at the end
only for the convenience of the reader.
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 PARTICULATE EMISSION REGULATIONS 3
2.1 Fuel Burning 3
2.2 Incineration 4
2.3 General Process Sources 4
2.4 Visible Emissions 6
2.5 Sulfurlc Acid Plants 7
3.0 GASEOUS EMISSION REGULATIONS 7
3.1 Fuel Burning (Sulfur Dioxide) 7
3.2 Fuel Burning (Nitrogen Oxides) 8
3.3 Non-Ferrous Metals (Sulfur Dioxide) 9
3.4 Kraft Pulp (Sulfur Oxide) 10
3.5 Sulfuric Acid Plants (Sulfur Dioxide) 10
3.6 Sulfur Recovery Plants (Sulfur) 10
3.7 Nitric Acid Plants (Nitrogen Dioxide) 12
3.8 All Sources (Hydrocarbons) 12
3.9 Petroleum Storage 15
3.10 All Sources (Carbon Monoxide) 16
4.0 SUMMARY 16
DISTRIBUTION LIST 79
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
FIGURE NUMBER
DISTRIBUTION OF REGULATIONS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSIONS FROM SULFURIC ACID PLANTS
NUMBER OF STATES WHICH INCLUDED SPECIFIED
PARTICIPATE REGULATIONS
NUMBER OF STATES WHICH INCLUDED GASEOUS
REGULATIONS
11
17
18
TABLE NUMBER
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
Page
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING
SOURCES MAXIMUM LB PARTICULATE/106 BTU/HR 20
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO INCINERATION SOURCES
-LBS PARTICULATE/100 LBS REFUSE CHARGED- 24
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GENERAL PROCESS
SOURCES RATE OF ALLOWABLE EMISSION LBS
PARTICULATE/HR 29
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALUMINUM PROCESSES
RATE ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS LBS PART/HR 34
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GRAY IRON FROUNDRIES 35
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO IRON AND STEEL
PROCESSES RATE OF ALLOWABLE EMISSION LBS
PARTICULATE/HR 36
PARTICIPATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ASPHALT
BATCHING ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS
PARTICULATE/HOUR 37
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONCRETE
BATCHING ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS
PARTICULATE/HOUR 41
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FEED AND
GRAIN PROCESSING ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS
PARTICULATE/HOUR 43
vi
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (CONCLUDED)
TABLE NUMBER
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
Page
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO SECONDARY
NON-FERROUS OPERATIONS ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN
LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR 45
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO PHOSPHATE
FERTILIZER OPERATIONS ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN
LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR 46
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO PETROLEUM
REFINING OPERATIONS ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN
LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR 47
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO COAL
CLEANING PROCESSES 48
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO LIME KILNS 49
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO KRAFT
PULP LBS/TON OF AIR-DRIED KRAFT PULP 50
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VISIBLE EMISSION -
PARTICULATE- 51
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO STATED SOURCES 55
FROM FINAL PLANS - 1975 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE
TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS
LBS S02/106 BTU 58
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO STATED SOURCES 64
SULFUR OXIDE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO KRAFT
PULP 67
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO HYDROCARBON 69
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO PETROLEUM STORAGE 73
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CARBON MONOXIDE 77
vii
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Final State Implementation Plans (SIP's) were submitted by all
50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam
and the Virgin Islands. Since submission of the plans, California
has revised its rules and regulations section. Their amended plan now
lists separate regulations for each of California's 50 counties. No
statewide regulations exist which could be included in this document,
so the 50 sets of California county regulations must be reviewed and
summarized individually. EPA will prepare a separate document to
summarize the California county regulations and to serve as a supple-
ment to this report.
Whenever both state regulations and local regulations were included
in a plan, the state regulations were extracted and put in the summary
tables, with footnotes indicating the local regulations. If the local
regulation was the same as for the state, the regulation was not restated.
The regulations appear as they did in the SIP's, and in some cases, may
be promulgated by EPA.
Although the tables contain only summaries of the regulations, a
high degree of detail has been used. But the reader who must use specific
detailed regulations is advised to refer to the individual plans, for
it must be remembered that the purpose of the tables presented here is
only to summarize the emission regulations in a convenient format.
-------
Emission regulations were extracted for the following:
o Particulate
o Fuel Burning Table I
o Incineration Table II
o General Process Sources
o Aluminum Process Sources
o Gray Iron Foundries
o Iron and Steel Process Sources
o Asphalt Batching
o Concrete Batching
o Feed and Grain Processes
o Secondary Non-Ferrous Operations
o Phosphate Fertilizer Operations
o Petroleum Refining Operations
o Coal Cleaning Processes
o Lime Kiln
o Kraft Pulp
o Visible Emissions
o Sulfuric Acid Plants (Mist)
o Gaseous
o Fuel Burning (sulfur dioxide)
o Fuel Burning (nitrogen oxides)
o Non-Ferrous Metals (sulfur dioxide)
o Kraft Pulp (sulfur oxide)
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Table VI
Table VII
Table VIII
Table IX
Table X
Table XI
Table XII
Table XIII
Table XIV
Table XV
Table XVI
Table XVII
Table XVIII
Table XIX
Table XIX
Table XX
-------
o Sulfuric Acid Plants (sulfur dioxide) Table XVII
o Sulfur Recovery Plants (sulfur) Table XVII
o Nitric Acid Plants (nitrogen dioxide) Table XVII
o All Sources (Hydrocarbons) Table XXI
o Petroleum Storage Table XXII
o All Sources (Carbon' Monoxide) Table XXIII
2.0 PARTICULATE EMISSION REGULATIONS
2.1 Fuel Burning
Generally, the regulations regarding particulate emissions
from fuel burning sources were expressed in pounds per million
British Thermal Units of heat input per hour (Ibs. particulate/10
BTU/hr.). In a few cases, the regulation was expressed as grains
per standard cubic foot (gr/scf). In order to convert these to
Ibs. particulate/10 BTU/hr., the following conversion factor was
used: 0.12 gr/scf =0.2 lbs/10 BTU. Regulations expressed in
other units appear in the footnotes.
Of the 55 states submitting final regulations approximately
16 (30%) added regulations for particulate emissions from fuel
burning sources or altered that regulation which appeared in their
preliminary plan. Table I summarizes these most recent regula-
tions .
-------
2.2 Incineration
About half of the SIP's expressed their regulations regarding
particulate emissions from incineration sources in grains per
standard cubic feet (gr/scf) while the other half used the units
pounds particulate per 100 pounds refuse charged (Ibs. part/100 Ibs.
refuse). The following conversion factor was used to convert
gr/scf to Ibs. part/100 Ibs. refuse: 0.1 gr/scf = 0.095 lbs/100
Ibs. refuse. Some regulations appear to differ by 0.01 lbs/100
Ibs. refuse. This is very likely the result of some states round-
ing their values while others may have truncated the last decimal
place. Consequently, regulations which appear to be 0.01 lbs/100
Ibs. refuse less than another are not necessarily more stringent
regulations.
None of the regulations in either the Texas final or preliminary
SIP's seemed to apply to particulate emissions from Incinerators.
Of the 54 states which did submit applicable final regulations,
14 (26%) had added or significantly modified their regulation from
that which appeared in their preliminary plan. These final
regulations have been summarized in Table II.
2.3 General Process Sources
Almost every SIP included a "general" process weight table and
a number of states also submitted at least one process weight table
for a specific industry. Sections which follow summarize the
process weight tables for nine of the specific industries. Other
-------
industries have particulate regulations which are not expressed
as process weight tables. These regulations are summarized in
Tables XIII, XIV and XV. A few specialized regulations for such
things as cotton ginning did appear in the plans but are only men-
tioned here to advise of their existence and they were not summar-
ized for this paper. Table III summarizes the general tables and
is expressed in the units pounds emitted per hour (Ibs./hr.) as a
function of the process weight rate in pounds per hour (Ibs./hr.).
Most states also supplied an equation to be used for interpolation
between the values included in their tables. There was very little
variation between the process weight tables which various states
gave for their regulation, but many states changed or expanded the
general process weight tables which they had presented in their
preliminary plans.
The number of states which stated particulate regulations for
various specific industries are shown below, and the number of the
table in which the regulations can be found is indicated.
Industry No. of States Table
Aluminum Process Sources 5 IV
Gray Iron Foundries 15 V
Iron and Steel Process
Sources 6 VI
Asphalt Batching 19 VII
Concrete Batching 15 VIII
Feed and Grain Processes 7 IX
-------
Secondary Non-Ferrous Operations 4 X
Phosphate Fertilizer Operations 4 XI
Petroleum Refining Operations 6 XII
Coal Cleaning Processes 3 XIII
Lime Kilns 4 XIV
Kraft Pulp 13 XV
2.4 Visible Emissions
Table XVI summarizes the visible emission regulations, expressed
as percent opacity, which were presented in the final SIP's. In
most cases the regulations were noted as both the allowable Ringel-
mann Number and the percent opacity, but if only the Ringelmann
Number was given, the following table was used to convert to per-
cent opacity:
Ringelmann Number % Opacity
0.5 10%
1.0 20%
1.5 30%
2.0 40%
3.0 60%
4.0 80%
5.0 100%
The states appear to be heading for a universal regulation of
20% opacity for all sources, although many states still permit
higher emissions for old equipment.
-------
2.5 Sulfuric Acid Plants
Emission regulations applicable to sulfuric acid mist emissions
from sulfuric acid plants were included in the SIP's of only 26
states. Generally, the regulations were expressed as pounds of
acid mist per ton of acid (100% H-SO.) produced (Ibs/ton 100% acid).
Arkansas, Colorado, and Missouri specify only ground level concentra-
tions which may not be exceeded. The most up-to-date sulfuric acid
mist regulations are summarized in Table XVII.
3.0 GASEOUS EMISSION REGULATIONS
3.1 Fuel Burning (Sulfur Dioxide)
Because of the large amount of interest within EPA in the sulfur
regulations, Table XVIII which summarizes these regulations is more
detailed than the other tables included in this report. Since it
is also anticipated that this Table will be used more regularly
than the others, it was formatted differently. Remarks which
ordinarily appear in footnotes at the end of the table have been
noted in the table itself to the right of the appropriate regula-
tions for easy access. The other major difference between this
table and the others is that a separate notation has been made for
every local area having regulations whether or not these regula-
tions differed from the state ones and regardless of whether or
not the local areas had specified a sulfur regulation. (For the
other tables, as was mentioned earlier, all local regulations were
reviewed but only those which differed from the state regulations
-------
were noted.) No regulations applying to sulfur dioxide emissions
from fuel burning nor for sulfur limitations on fuel could be found
in the Wyoming final SIP.
Fuel limitations have been listed separately for coal and oil
and were expressed as either % sulfur content allowable or pounds
of sulfur per million British Thermal Unit (Ibs. S/106BTU). Those
values expressed in Ibs. S/106BTU appear in parentheses. The rest
of the columns show the allowable sulfur dioxide emissions for
various rates of heat input. These regulations are expressed as
maximum allowable pounds of sulfur dioxide emitted per million
British Thermal Unit of heat input per hour (Ibs. S02/106BTU).
Some states gave their emission regulations in Ibs. S/10°BTU.
These numerical values were multiplied by two to convert them to
Ibs. S02/106BTU.
3.2 Fuel Burning (Nitrogen Oxides)
Ten states which did not list regulations for nitrogen oxide
emissions from fuel burning sources in their preliminary plans
included such regulations in their final SIP's. All those states
with regulations for nitrogen oxide emissions stated them in terms
of the type of fuel used (gas, liquid, or solid), and expressed
them in pounds of nitrogen oxides per million British Thermal Units
of heat input per hour (Ibs. NOX/10^BTU). In a few cases the regu-
lation was given in Ibs. NC^/IO^BTU, but the table does not note
this.
8
-------
Most states which specified nitrogen oxide regulations used
(a) 0.2 Ibs. NOX/106BTU as the maximum allowable emissions when
gas is the fuel; (b) 0.3 Ibs. NOX/106BTU as the maximum allowable
emissions when liquid fuel is used and (c) 0.7 Ibs. NOX/106BTU as
the maximum allowable emissions when solid fuel is used.
The first three columns of Table XIX show those regulations
found in the final SIP's which apply to nitrogen oxide emissions
from fuel burning sources.
3.3 Non-Ferrous Metals (Sulfur Dioxide)
Sulfur dioxide emission regulations covering non-ferrous
smelters concern only copper, zinc, and lead smelters. Just 12
states have such regulations and they are summarized in the last
three columns of Table XIX. All these regulations were expressed
in pounds of sulfur dioxide emitted per hours (Ibs. S02/hr.) and
as a function of total sulfur feed to the smelter expressed in
pounds of sulfur per hour (lbs/hr.).
The table shows the regulations as an expression in x, but
they are all equal to y, as shown by the Arizona regulation for
copper smelters. The variable x equals total sulfur feed (Ib/hr.)
and y represents the corresponding allowable sulfur dioxide
emissions (Ibs. SC>2/hr.).
In the preliminary plans, both Mississippi and Ohio gave
regulations for zinc smelters of y = 0.564 x * . In the final
0 8 "5
plans, both states changed these to y = 0.564 x * . The state
-------
of Connecticut added regulations for non-ferrous smelters to their
final plan and the only other change in these regulations from
what appeared in the preliminary plans was made by Puerto Rico.
Their regulation for copper was changed from y = 0.2x to y = O.lx.
3.4 Kraft Pulp (Sulfur Oxide)
Some states stated specific regulations for sulfur oxides
emitted from Kraft Pulp processes. These regulations have been
summarized in Table XX.
3.5 Sulfuric Acid Plants (Sulfur Dioxide)
Regulations covering sulfur dioxide emissions from sulfuric
acid plants are summarized in column 2 of Table XVII. There were
24 states which did not include this type of regulation in their
final plan.
Arkansas, Colorado, and Missouri gave their regulations in terms
of ground level concentration standards. Other states with regulations
expressed them in Ibs. SO./ton 100% acid. The range of emissions
allowed by various states was great, from 4.0 Ibs. SC-/ton 100% acid
to 45 Ibs. SO./ton 100% acid. Figure 1 shows a distribution of these
regulations. Utah's regulation which specifies 80% control was not
included in this diagram, and when separate regulations were specified
for new and existing plants, the limitation for new plants was used.
3.6 Sulfur Recovery Plants (Sulfur)
Most states expressed their sulfur emissions regulation apply-
ing to sulfur recovery plants in pounds of sulfur per pound of
input sulfur (Ibs. S/lb. input). These were the units used for
10
-------
25H
20H
c/)
H
w 15^
10-
5-
22
10
NO REGS 4.0 6.5 7.0-24 LBS >25 LBS S02/ GR. LEVEL
LBS S02/ LBS S02/ S02/TON TON 100% CONCENTRATION
TON 100% TON 100% 100% ACID ACID STANDARDS
ACID ACID
FIGURE 1
DISTRIBUTION OF REGULATIONS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
FROM SULFURIC ACID PLANTS
-------
the table prepared to summarize these regulations (column 3 of
Table XVII). A majority of those states which have sulfur emis-
sion regulations for sulfur recovery plants, specified the same
regulation, 0.01 Ibs S/lb. input. Arkansas and Colorado again used
ground level concentration standards to express their regulations
applying to Sulfur Recovery Plants.
3.7 Nitric Acid Plants (Nitrogen Dioxide)
Twenty-two states have regulations specifying allowable nitric
oxide emissions from nitric acid plants. These regulations are
summarized in Table XVII column 4 and are expressed in pounds of
nitrogen dioxide per ton of 100% acid produced (Ibs. IKK/ton 100%
acid). Generally, states have a regulation of 5.5 Ibs N0»/ton 100%
acid. The only state which stated its regulation in terms of ground
level concentration standards was Colorado.
3.8 All Sources (Hydrocarbons)
Regulations applying to hydrocarbons were specified for as many
as seven different classifications and are expressed more in terms
of required control devices and precautions than in terms of emis-
sion limitations. The regulations for hydrocarbons which states
included in their plans are basically the same as those given in
the Federal Register V. 36 No. 158 of August 14, 1971. The most
common change a state made in these regulations was to specify
a different tank capacity.
12
-------
In order to summarize these regulations in a concise manner,
Table XXI was prepared to show which states have which type of
hydrocarbon regulation. Brief summaries of the corresponding regu-
lations which appeared in the above-mentioned Federal Register and
the SIP's are listed below. A total of 31 states included hydro-
carbon regulations in their final SIP's.
1) Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds: No person shall place,
store or hold in any stationary tank of more than 40,000 gallons
capacity any volatile organic compounds unless such tank is a
pressure tank capable of maintaining working pressures at all
times to prevent vapor or gas loss to the atmosphere or is
designed and equipped with one of the following vapor loss
control devices: floating roof, vapor recovery system, other
equipment or means of equal efficiency for purposes of air
pollution control as approved by the agency.
2) Volatile Organic Compounds Loading Facilities: No person shall
load or permit the loading of any volatile organic compounds
into any tank having a capacity in excess of 200 gallons unless
such loading facility is equipped with a vapor collection and
disposal system or its equivalent, properly installed, in good
working order and in operation.
3) Volatile Organic Compound Water Separation: No person shall use
any compartment of any single or multiple compartment volatile
organic compound water separation which receives effluent water
13
-------
containing 200 gallons a day or more of any volatile organic
compound from equipment processing, refining, treating, storing
or handling volatile organic compounds unless such compartment
is equipped with one of the following vapor loss control devices,
properly installed, in good working order, and in operation:
a) A container having all openings sealed and totally enclosing
the liquid contents. All gauging and sampling devices shall
be gas-tight except when gauging or sampling is taking place.
b) A container equipped with a floating roof. All gauging and
sampling devices shall be gas-tight except when gauging or
sampling is taking place.
c) A container equipped with a vapor recovery system. All
gauging and sampling devices shall be gas-tight except when
gauging or sampling is taking place.
d) A container having other equipment of equal efficiency for
purposes of air pollution control may be approved.
4) Pumps and Compressors: All pumps and compressors handling
volatile organic compounds shall have mechanical seals or other
equipment of equal efficiency.
5) Waste Gas Disposal: No person shall emit a waste gas stream from
any ethylene producing plant or other ethylene emission source
unless the waste gas is properly burned at 1300°F for 0.3 seconds
or greater in a direct-flame afterburner.
14
-------
6) Organic Solvents: No person shall discharge into the atmosphere
more than 15 pounds of organic materials in any one day, nor
more than 3 pounds in any one hour, from any article, machine,
equipment and other contrivance unless said discharge has been
reduced by at least 85 percent. This shall be accomplished by:
a) Incineration, provided that 90 percent or more of the
carbon in the organic compounds being incinerated is
oxidized to carbon dioxide, or
b) carbon absorption, or
c) processing in a manner determined by the Commissioner
to be not less effective than the above two methods.
7) Architectural Coatings: No person shall cause or allow the sale
of any architectural coating containing a photochemically reactive
solvent in containers of greater than one gallon capacity; no
person shall thin or dilute any architectural coating in quantities
greater than one quart of a photochemically reactive solvent.
3.9 Petroleum Storage
The hydrocarbon regulations for petroleum storage which were
noted in Table XXI have been shown in detail in Table XXII. This
table was prepared to show the degree of variation in these regula-
tions. For detailed statements of the other hydrocarbon regulations
outlined in Table XXI, the reader should see the individual state
plans, but again there is little variation between the wording of
these regulations.
15
-------
3.10 All Sources (Carbon Monoxide)
Fourteen states specified regulations for the control of carbon
monoxide emissions. Generally, these states specified the following
regulation with only minor variations: no person shall emit carbon
monoxide waste gases unless they are burned at 1300°F for 0.3 seconds
or greater in a direct flame afterburner or boiler equipped with an
indicating pyrometer.
Table XXIII shows which states specified carbon monoxide regula-
tions for certain industries.
4.0 SUMMARY
Numerous changes and additions were made to the regulations given
in the preliminary plans before they were included in the final plans.
In order to prepare summaries of the sets of these emission regulations
included in this paper, final SIP's were reviewed for 55 states and
additions and changes received before 14 July 1972 were also used.
Because California submitted an amended plan with separate regulations
for each county, it will be summarized separately. Figures 2 and 3
show the number of states out of the 55 whose plans were reviewed that
actually included a regulation for each of the major emission categories
dealth with in this paper. California was included in these figures
to complete the picture of the regulations for the entire United States.
While virtually every state has regulations for sulfur dioxide
from fuel burning and all the particulate emission classes except
sulfuric acid mist, the number of states passing regulations for
gaseous emissions is considerably less. Although the fewest regulations
16
-------
55-
50-
X
H
M
* 40-
w
5s
H M
fa ^30-
o »
i 20-
10-
53
54
53
55
26
,
FUEL INCINERATION GENERAL VISIBLE SULFURIC
FURNING PROCESS EMISSIONS ACID MIST
SOURCES
REGULATION
FIGURE 2
NUMBER OF STATES WHICH INCLUDED SPECIFIED PARTICULATE REGULATIONS
-------
55 -H
50 -
40-
ae
H
u
H n
-------
were passed for non-ferrous smelters, this is probably due in part
to the fact that very few states actually have operating non-ferrous
smelters.
The regulations which varied the most from state to state are
those which applied to Fuel Burning (Particulate and Sulfur Dioxide)
and Incineration emissions. Very little variation was noted in the
general process tables or in the visible emissions regulations. Although
significantly fewer states submitted regulations for Sulfuric Acid
Plants, Sulfur Recovery Plants, Nitric Acid Plants, Non-Ferrous Metals,
and Carbon Monoxide, most of them adapted the same basic regulations,
adding slight modifications when necessary for specific areas. States
specifying hydrocarbon regulations did not always include each of
the seven different classes or regulations, but within any one class
the overall meaning of the different state regulations was the same.
The tables presented in this paper have been prepared to give the
reader a convenient summary of the most recent state air pollution
emission regulations. They provide ready comparison of the basic
regulations as stated in each state's final SIP, and footnotes were
used to indicate exceptions or qualifications of the basic regulations.
No attempt has been made to use these tables to present the specified
regulations in their entirety.
19
-------
TABLE I
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES
MAXIMUM LB PARTICULATE/I06 BTU/hr
HILL KIN BTU/HX HEAT INPUT
Alabama1
Aliaka
ArUona
Arkanaaa'
California9
Colorado
Connecticut
D,l«war«
Olit .of col .
Florida
Ha»all
Idaho
lllllU.l«
Indiana
lova
Kanaaa
Xantucky
Loulalana
Haina
nain* „
Maryland "
Haaaachuaacta
Michigan"
HlnnaMt*
Hlaalaalppl
Hlaaour<27
Montana ?•
Mafcraaka
ttavada
Nav tumpahlra
Nav Jaraay
Nev Maxlco
Nav York'1
N. Carolina
N. Dakota"
Oh to 3>
Oklahoma
Dragon
Pannajplvanla,
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Taul
Utah40
Varannt
Virginia
Vaanlngton
U. Virginia4*
Vltcomln47
Vyo*ing48
A. Saaua
CuM8
Piiarto Rico
Virgin lalanda
10
20
0.37
0.48
0.48
*.£}
0.4
0.3
0.4"
5V
„ _,,?
0.411'
0.41
0.38
0.41
0.46
0.22
0.38
u.44
0.486
0.4"
44
100
0.18
0.352
O.li
0.07
0.33
0.32
0.35
0.4 12'
0.33
0.40
0.33
0.132
0.40
0.15
0.33
0.37
0.33
0.443
0.2
0.13
.16
0.4
0.352
•S2IK)
J.13>
.200
0.3"
0.10
<250
0.12'
0.26
.
j.osy •
0.34
0.1*1
0.15
>250
3.1
3.0523
3.1
D.10
500
0.1
0.311
1000
0.207
0.04
15
0.21
0.19
0.20
0.26"
0.21
0.28
0.21
0.207
0.28
0.19
0.22S
0. IB
0.328
0.1
0.2
0,02"
0.27
0.207
500
9.24"
3.15
1.24
1.291
5,000
0.14
9.13
0.14
9.22
0.15
3.15B
9.266
7300
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.20
0.141
0.232
10,000
0.0904
0.02
0.12
0.12
).19i6
0.12
0.19
0.12
0.090
0.19
0.133
0.136
0.10
0.242
0.1
0.1
0.18
0.09
>1 0.000
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.12
0.19"
0.12
0.19
0.12
0.19
0.10
0.1
0.10
0.18
0.09
50,000
0.0243'
0.197
101
0.125
0.024
0.180
0.1
ALL
O.I
0.2010
0.6"
0. ll*
0.6H
0.6"
0.6
0.423
0.0510
0.171'
0.3
0.3
o!o5
0.1
0.3
-------
TABLE I - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES (CONT'D)
for all sources in Class I counties and for new sources In Class II
counties; for existing sources In Class II counties:
HEAT INPUT ALLOWABLE EMISSION
(Millions of BTU/HR) (lb/106 BTU)
1 0.8
10 0.8
20 0.53
40 0.35
100 0.21
200 0.14
250 0.12
1,000,000 0.12
2for 40 million BTU/hr
3for 200 million BTU/hr
4for 250 million BTU/hr
5for 1,000,000 million BTU/hr
for 40 million BTU/hr
70.0607 for 20,000 x 166 BTU/hr
no general regulation stated in final plan
9
each county has its own regulations
for existing sources; 0.10 lbs/106 BTU for new sources
Uafter January 1, 1973
12for <3.5 million BTU/hr
utilize latest technology for sources with <250 million BTU/hr capacity
14
for existing equioment; for new equipment:
0.5 lbs/106 BTU for <10 million BTU/hr
P 0.5 (10/R)0'5 lbs/106 BTU for <250 million BTU/hr
0.10 lbs/106 BTU for >250 million BTU/hr
15P 0.7 (10/R)0.202 lbs/106 BTU for equipment <2000 million BTU/hr
16for >2000 million BTU/hr
converted from bagasse
18
for all new sources and for all existing sources in Chicago and those
existing sources outside of Chicago with >250 million BTU/hr capacity.
Exceptions are sources presently not exceeding 0.2 lbs/106 BTU. These
sources are not allowed to degrade more than 0.05 lbs/106 BTU
19for new installations; 0.8 lbs/106 BTU for existing installations
0.8 lbs/106 BTU for existing equipment outside any SMSA
21for >150 million BTU/hr
22
for existing equipment for AQCR's I, II, V and VI
for the Baltimore AQCR and National Capital AQCR:
0.08 lbs/106 BTU for <200 million BTU/hr
0.05 lbs/106 BTU for >200 million BTU/hr
21
-------
TABLE I - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES (CONT'D)
23
for solid fuel burning in National Capital and Baltimore AQCR's; 0.05
Ibs Part/106 BTU for all solid fuel burning sources in the rest of the
state; for residual oil burning sources >200 million BTU/hr heat input
in National Capital and Baltimore AQCR's: 0.033 Ibs Part/106 BTU if
existing or modified, 0.016 Ibs Part/106 BTU if new; for all residual oil
sources in rest of state, 0.016 Ibs Part/106 BTU.
24
for state:
0.50 to 0.30 Ibs/lOOOlbs gas for <120,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.18 Ibs/lOOOlbs gas for >1,000,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.65 lbs/1000 Ibs gas for <100,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.65 to 0.45 Ibs/lOOOlbs gas for <-300,000 Ibs steam/hr
for >300,000 Ibs steam/hr limit will be negotiated
Pulverized
Fuel Fired
Other Modes of
Fuel Fired
for Wayne County:
0.50 to 0.30 lbs/1000 Ibs gas for <300,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.30 lbs/1000 Ibs gas for >300,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.65 lbs/1000 Ibs gas for <100,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.65 to 0.45 lbs/1000 Ibs gas for <300,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.45 to 0.30 lbs/1000 Ibs gas for <800,000 Ibs steam/hr
0.30 lbs/1000 gas for >800,000 Ibs steam/hr
Pulverized
Fuel Fired
rOther Modes of
Fuel Fired
25
for Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro Area and Duluth and all new installations;
0.6 lbs/106 BTU for existing installations outside the Minneapolis - St. Paul
Metro Area and Duluth
26
estimated from a diagram
27 f>
for Kansas City; 0.6 lbs/10 BTU max emissions for St. Louis and state of
Missouri
28
for existing equipment: for new equipment:
0.60 lbs/106 BTU for£10 million BTU/hr
0.35 Ibs/106 BTU for 100 million BTU/hr
0.20 lbs/106 BTU for 1000 million BTU/hr
0.12 lbs/106 BTU for>10,000 million BTU/hr
29
for existing equipment; for new equipment:
0.60 lbs/106 BTU for<10 million BTU/hr
0.40 lbs/106 BTU for 50 million BTU/hr
0.35 lbs/106 BTU for 100 million BTU/hr
0.23 lbs/106 BTU for 500 million BTU/hr
0.20 lbs/106 BTU for 1000 million BTU/hr
0.15 lbs/106 BTU for 2500 million BTU/hr
0.13 lbs/106 BTU for 5000 million BTU/hr
0.12 lbs/106 BTU for >7500 million BTU/hr
30
after December 31, 1974 for coal burning equipment
22
-------
TABLE I - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES (CONC'D)
31,
New York - for sources burning coal and wood; 0.10 Ibs 106 BTU for
oil burning sources or new coal sources with >250 million BTU/hr
heat input
32
for priority I region only; for Priority II and III regions:
0.6 lbs/106 BTU for<10 million BTU/hr
0.2 lbs/106 BTU for 100 million BTU/hr
0.15 lbs/106 BTU for >1000 million BTU/hr
33 6
for new sources only; 0.33 lbs/10 BTU for existing sources
34for <50 million BTU/hr
O C
for A=3.6E~0-56 for <600 million BTU/hr; 0.1 lbs/106 BTU for >600
million BTU/hr
same as process weight restrictions
for existing sources
38
for new and existing with <400 million BTU/hr capacity; for >400 million
BTU/hr limitation is dependent on stack height
for new sources; for existing sources: 0.6 lbs/106 BTU for<10 million BTU/hr
0.34 lbs/106 BTU for 100 million BTU/hr
0.18 lbs/106 BTU for 1000 million BTU/hr
0.10 lbs/106 BTU for >10,000 million BTU/hr
40
85% control for coal fired steam electric plants and for space heating
41for >300 million BTU/hr
42for >1000 million BTU/hr
43for < 25 million BTU/hr
44for >25 million BTU/hr and <10,000 million BTU/hr:
E=0.8425H-0-2314 where H = total heat in million BTU/hr
for existing units; 0.17 for new sources and after July 1, 1975 for all
sources
for fuel burning unit used for generation of steam to produce electric
power; 0.09 lbs/106 BTU for units such as industrial pulverized fuel
fired furnaces, and cyclone furnaces; 0.166 lbs/106 BTU for handfired or
stoker fired furnaces
for new sources except in Milwaukee; 0.60 lbs/106 BTU for existing
sources except in Milwaukee and Lake Michigan AQCR; 0.30 lbs/106 BTU
for existing sources in Lake Michigan AQCR; 0.15 lbs/106 BTU for all
sources in Milwaukee
48for existing equipment; 0.10 lbs/106 BTU for new equipment
23
-------
TABLE II
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO INCINERATION SOURCES
-LBS PARTICIPATE / 100 LBS REFUSE CHARGED -
CAPACITY, LB/HR
Alabama
Alaska2
Arizona^
Arkansas
California5
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Dist. of Col.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Marylandl?
Massachusetts
MichiganZl
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri23
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada24
N. Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico25
New York
N. Carolina
N. Dakota27
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee
Texas33
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
<200
0.29
0.29
0.15
0.29
0.29"
0.30
0.29
0.29
0.29
0.20
0.2028
0.2929
>200
0.19
0.19
0.09
0.19
0.191*
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.1929
<2000
0.20
0.0911
0.3914
0.0919
0.19
0.19
D.1028
.1530
0.2032
>2000
0.093
0.18
0.0812
0.2312
0.0319
0.10
0.09
0.09
0.02
D.0830
0.1032
cAOOO
0.167
0.10l<
0.19
>4000
0.089
0.0810
0.08
> 10, 000
0.0513
0.0915
34
ALL
0.201
0.22
0.086
0.038
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.1916
0.19
ift
0.0920
0.1922
0.5026
0.40
0.09
31
0.20
0.10
0.13
0.0935
24
-------
TABLE II (CONT'D)
W. Virginia
Wisconsin 37
Wyoming
Samoa
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
<200
0.41
0.1738
0.29
>200
0.27
0.19
<2000
22000
<4000
0.11
0.20
0.40
>4000
0.08
0.10
> 10, 000
0.1336
ALL
0.20
0.20
0.20
25
-------
TABLE II - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO INCINERATION SOURCES (CONT'D)
0.40 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for wood waste burners
2
for new installations only; 40% capacity for existing installations
(more than 3 minutes in any hour)
3fpr >1000 Ibs/hr capacity
4 0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for Maricopa County
each county has its own regulation
for new sources only; 0.23 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing sources
for <3000 Ibs/hr capacity; no regulation stated for >3000 Ibs/hr capacity
Q
for new sources only; 0.08 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing sources
9
for new sources only; after July 1, 1975 existing incinerators with
charging rates of >4000 Ibs/hr shall be restricted to emitting
0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse
for new incinerators; 0.19 for all existing incinerators
for new incinerators only; 0.19 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing incinerators
12
for >1000 Ibs/hr capacity
13
for >60,000 Ibs/hr capacity
for <1000 Ibs/hr capacity
for>20,000 Ibs/hr capacity
for all existing sources and for new sources <4000 Ibs/hr capacity;
0.08 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for new sources >4000 Ibs/hr capacity
These regulations are for the following AQCR's: Eastern Shore, Md.;
Southern Md.; Central Md.; and Cumberland, Md-Keyser, W. Va.
The following regulations apply to the other two AQCR's: National
Capital Interstate and Metropolitan Baltimore
0.03 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for all incinerators after July 1, 1973
18
for existing and modified incinerators only
19
for new incinerators only
20
for all existing incinerators and for new commercial, industrial, and
residential incinerators; 0.05 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for new municipal
incinerators - these resulations apply to all 6 AQCR's
21
for Michigan (including Wayne County) the following regulations apply:
Rating in Ibs/hr lbs/1000 Iba Gas
Residential apartments 0-200 0.65
Residential apartments 200 and over 0.30
Commercial & Industrial 0-400 0.65
Commerical & industrial 400 and over 0.30
Municipal All 0.30
26
-------
TABLE II - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO INCINERATION SOURCES (CONT'D)
22
for existing incinerators; 0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for new incinerators
23
0.19 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for all incinerators in Kansas City
24
cannot exceed 20% opacity for periods totaling one minute in any one hour
25
state regulation not specified in final plan. Albuquerque regulation:
0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing incinerators; construction, use
or operation of new incinerators is prohibited and after Jan 1, 1976
use or operation of any incinerator is prohibited
26
for existing incinerators except in New York City, Nassau and Westchester
Counties; for new and modified incinerators:
0.3 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for <1000 Ibs/hr capacity
0.22 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for 10,000 Ibs/hr capacity
0.13 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for 100,000 Ibs/hr capacity
for all incinerators in New York City, Nassau, and Westchester Counties:
0.2 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for <1000 Ibs/hr capacity
0.15 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for 10,000 Ibs/hr capacity
0.08 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for 100,000 Ibs/hr capacity
27for<1000 Ibs/hr refuse burning rate E=0.00515R°-90 and for >1000 Ibs/hr
refuse burning rate E=0.025RO«°7 where E=allowable emission rate in
Ibs/hr and R=refuse burning rate in Ibs/hr
28
for <100 and >100 Ibs/hr capacity
29
State regulations for existing sources; 0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for
new sources; Regulations for Mid-Willamette Valley and Lane Regional:
0.19 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing sources
0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for new sources
Regulations for Columbia-Willamette:
Depending on heat input rate
0.09-0.29 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing sources
0.05-0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for new sources
for new incinerators; applies to existing incinerators 3 years after
effective data of regulation
0.5 lbs/10^ BTU of heat input for new installations and for all incinerators
by 1974; 0.75 lbs/106 BTU of heat input for existing incinerators
32for new incinerators only; 0.6 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing incinerators
with <200 Ibs/hr capacity; 0.4 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing incinerators
>200 Ibs/hr capacity
33
no general regulation stated in the final plan
3485% control
35for all incinerators after July 1, 1975; until then 0.19 lbs/100 Ibs
refuse for existing incinerators and 0.09 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for new
incinerators
36for >15,000 Ibs/hr capacity
27
-------
TABLE II - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO INCINERATION SOURCES (CONT'D)
for new sources; 0.34 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing sources <500 Ibs/hr
capacity and 0.27 lbs/100 Ibs refuse for existing sources >500 Ibs/hr
capacity
38
for <500 Ibs/hr capacity
28
-------
to
TABLE III
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GENERAL PROCESS SOURCES
RATE OF ALLOWABLE EMISSION LBS PARTICULATE / HR
STATE
Alabama^
Alaska2
Arizona
Arkansas
California3
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware^
Dist. of Col.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois 8
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Mary land ^
Massachusetts^
Michigan
Minnesota
PROCESS WEIGHT
100
0.56
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.46
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.46
0.46
0.55
0.55
1,000
2.34
2.58
2.25
2.25
2.25
2.80
2.25
2.58
2.58
2.58
1.75
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.25
2.80
2.80
2.58
2.58
5,000
6.33
7.58
6.34
6.34
6.34
6.67
6.34
7.58
7.58
7.58
-
7.58
7.58
7.58
7.58
7.58
6.34
6.67
6.67
7.58
7.58
10,000
9.76
12.00
9.73
9.73
9.73
10.00
9.73
12.00
-
12.00
6.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
9.73
10.00
10.00
12.00
12.00
20,000
14.97
19.20
14.99
14.99
14.99
16.19
14.99
19.20
19.20
19.20
8.70
19.20
19.20
19.20
19.20
19.20
14.99
16.19
16.19
19.20
19.20
40,000
-
-
-
-
-
28.30
-
30.50
30.50
30.50
12.50
30.50
30.50
30.50
30.50
30.50
-
28.30
28.30
30.50
30.50
1ATE, LB/HR
60,000
29.83
40.00
29.60
29.60
29.60
40.00
29.60
40.00
40.00
40.00
15.60
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
29.60
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
120,000
33.33
46.30
33.28
-
33.28
40.00
33.28
68. 505
40.00
46.30
-
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
33.28
-
-
46.30
46.30
200,000
36.17
51.20
36.11
-
36.11
40.00
36.11
89. 76
40.00
51.20
29.50
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
36.11
-
51.30
51.20
51.20
1,000,000
46.79
69.00
46.72
-
46.72
40.00
46.72
262. 00 7
40.00
69.00
70.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
46.72
-
68.90
69.00
69.00
-------
TABLE III (CONT'D)
STATE
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
N. Hampshire11
New Jersey1*
New Mexico13
New York1'*
N. Carolina
N. Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee8
Texas
Utah*7
Vermont
Virginia
Washington18
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE, LB/HR
100
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.46
0.50
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.46
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.46
0.55
1,000
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.25
2.58
2.58
2.80
2.30
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.80
2.58
2.58
2.58
2.34
1.60
2.80
2.58
5,000
7.58
7.58
7.58
6.34
7.58
7.58
6.67
6.70
7.58
7.58
7.58
7.58
6.67
7.58
7.58
7.58
6.34
7.70
6.67
7.58
10,000
12.00
12.00
12.00
9.73
12.00
12.00
10.00
10.80
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
10.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
9.70
15.20
10.00
12.00
20,000
19.20
19.20
19.20
14.99
19.20
19.20
16.19
12.40
19.20
19.20
19.20
19.20
16.19
19.20
19.20
19.20
15.00
30.10
16.19
19.20
40,000
30.50
30.50
30.50
-
30.50
28.30
27.20
30.50
30.50
30.50
30.50
28.30
30.50
30.50
-
23.00
59.70
28.30
30.50
60,000
40.00
40.00
40.00
29.60
40.00
40.00
40.00
36.10
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
29.60
67.40
40.00
40.00
120,000
63.70
46.30
46.30
33.28
46.30
46.30
40.00
51.80
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
46.30
33.30
-
40.00
46.30
200,000
89.70
51.20
51.20
36.11
51.20
51.20
40.00
56.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
51.20
36.10
95.20
40.00
51.30
1,000,000
264.00
69.00
69.00
46.72
69.00
69.00
40.00
71.10
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
69.00
46.70
123. 9016
40.00
69.00
-------
TABLE III (CONT'D)
STATE
W. Virginia18
Wisconsin19
Wyoming8
Samoa
Guam
Puerto Rico20
Virgin Islands21
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE. LB/HR
100
0.55
0.55
0.46
0.46
0.55
0.55
1,000
2.25
2.25
2.80
2.80
2.25
2.58
5.000
6.34
6.34
6.67
6.67
6.34
7.58
10,000
9.73
9.73
10.00
10.00
9.73
12.00
20,000
14.99
14.99
16.19
16.19
16.00
19.20
40.000
-
-
28.30
28.30
-
30.50
60.000
29.60
29.60
40.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
120.000
33.28
33.28
40.00
-
46.00
46.30
200.000
36.11
36.11
40.00
-
51.00
-
ifooorooo
46.72
46.72
40.00
-
69.00
69.00
-------
TABLE III REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GENERAL PROCESS SOURCES (CONT'D)
for Class I counties only
for Class II counties:
0.55 for 100 Ibs/hr
2.57 for 1000 Ibs/hr
7.57 for 5000 Ibs/hr
12.05 for 10,000 Ibs/hr
19.18 for 20,000 Ibs/hr
39.96 for 60,000 Ibs/hr
46.30 for 120,000 Ibs/hr
51.28 for 200,000 Ibs/hr
68.96 for 1,000,000 Ibs/hr
2
0.05 gr/scfm for new plants; 0.10 gr/scfm for existing plants
each county has its own regulation.
general restriction is 0.2 gr/cu.ft.
for existing plants only, 46.3 Ibs Particulate/hr for new plants
for existing plants only; 51.2 Ibs Particulate/hr for new plants
for existing plants only. 69.0 Ibs Farticulate/hr for new plants
Q
for new plants only; existing plants - 0.55 for 100 Ibs/hr
2.58 for 1000 Ibs/hr
7.58 for 5000 Ibs/hr
12.00 for 10,000 Ibs/hr
19.20 for 20,000 Ibs/hr
30.50 for 40,000 Ibs/hr
40.00 for 60,000 Ibs/hr
46.30 for 120,000 Ibs/hr
51.20 for 200,000 Ibs/hr
69.00 for 1,000,000 Ibs/hr
g
for >60,000 Ibs/hr for Cumberland-Kevser, Eastern Shore, Central Md.,
and Southern, Md. AQCR's, E » 55.0 p *1;L-40
for existing installations only; for new installations and installations
in critical areas:
0.23 for 100 Ibs/hr
1.40 for 1000 Ibs/hr
3.39 for 5000 Ibs/hr
5.00 for 10,000 Ibs/hr
8.10 for 20,000 Ibs/hr
14.15 for 40,000 Ibs/hr
20.00 for 60,000 Ibs/hr
25.70 for 200,000 Ibs/hr
34.50 for 1,000,000 Ibs/hr
32
-------
TABLE III
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GENERAL PROCESS SOURCES (CONT'D)
11
12
for new plants; for existing plants:
0.68 for 100 Ibs/hr
3.17 for 1000 Ibs/hr
9.35 for 5000 Ibs/hr
14.85 for 10,000 Ibs/hr
23.62 for 20,000 Ibs/hr
49.31 for 60,000 Ibs/hr
55.55 for 120,000 Ibs/hr
61.53 for 200,000 Ibs/hr
82.75 for 1,000,000 Ibs/hr
Maximum Allowable Emission Rate for Particles
Potential Emission
Allowable Emission Rate Source Gas Emitted
Allowable Emission
Rate from Source Operation (Based on 997. efficiency from Source Operation Rate (Based on 0.02
(Ibs/hr)
50 or less
100
1000
3000 or greater
of collection) (Ibs/hr) (Std. cu.ft./min.) gr/scfmXlbs/hr)
10.0
30.0
3000 or less 0.5
70,000 12.0
175,000 or greater 30.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
for Albuquerque-Bernalillo Co. state did not include a general process curve
applies to sources with an environmental rating of B or C. Emissions from
source with A or D rating are at discretion of the Dept. of Environmental
Conservation
if E <150,000 dry standard cubic ft/min, emissions «hould not exceed 0.04
gr/dry standard cubic ft.
If 150,000< E <300,000 dry standard cubic ft/min. A - 6000E"1
if E>300,000 dry standard cubic ft/min, emissions should not exceed 0.02
gr/dry standard cubic ft.
for 500,000 Ibs/hr
maintain a minimum of 852 control of particulate emissions
state did not include a general process curve
for new sources only
except where source cannot practicably apply, then emissions in any one hour
cannot exceed 0.02 Ibs for each pound of process weight
these values may be exceeded for those processes whose weight exceeds 200
tons/hr, provided that the concentration of particulate matter in the discharge
gases is less than 0.10 lbs/1000 Ibs gas.
33
-------
TABLE IV
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALUMINUM PROCESSES
RATE ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS LBS PART/HR
STATE
Delaware1
Oregon?
Pennsylvania
Sweating
Melting &
Refining
Virginia1
Washington?
PROCESS WEIGHT (LBS/HR)
1000
0.75
3.05
5000
3.75
9.05
10,000
7.50
16.65
20,000
15.00
24.00
40,000
30.00
36.00
50,000
37.50
42.00
REGULATION
Visible emissions may not exceed 20%
opacity
Not in excess of 0.02 gr/scf or
A-0.76(F x W)-42
where A - allowable emission in Ibs/hr
W - charging rate in units/hr
F - process factor in Ibs/unit
as shown below
F - 50 Ibs/ton of aluminum product
F - 10 Ibs/ton of aluminum feed
Total participate emissions may not
exceed on a daily basis 15 Ibs/ton of
aluminum
also applies to secondary brass and steel operations as wall as to secondary aluminum
for primary aluminum plants
-------
TABLE V
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GRAY IRON FOUNDRIES
RATE OF ALLOWABLE EMISSION LBS PARIICULATE/HR
STATE
Alabama
Connecticut
Iron Cupolas
Foundry sand
Georgia
If >50.000
Ibs/hr Input
If £50,000
Ibs/hr Input
Indiana
new foundries
existing fnds.
Iowa1
Massachusetts
Production
foundry
Jobbing foundry
Michigan
Product, foundry
Jobbing Foundry
Minnesota2
Missouri2
New Hampshire
new foundries
existing found.
New York'
North Car.4
Oklahoma
Tulsa
Tennessee^
U. Virginia
Wisconsin
Cupolas
Sintering
PROCESS WEIGHT (LBS/HR)
000
3.05
2.56
3.05
2.58
3.05
3.05
2.5S
3.17
3.05
3.05
3.05
-
5000
9.58
7.58
9.58
7.58
9.65
9.58
7.58
9.35
9.58
9.58
9.58
13.00
10.000
16.65
12.00
16.65
12.00
16.65
16.65
12.00
14.85
16.65
16.65
16.65
19.00
20,000
25.10
19.20
25.10
19.20 .
24.00
25.10
19.20
23.62
25.10
25.10
25.10
26.00
40.000
37.00
30.50
33.76
30.20
36.00
37.00
37.00
-
36.00
50.000
42.40
35.40
35.40
35.40
42.00
42.40
-
-
40.00
RECULAT ION
Remove 85X by weight of all partlculate
matter In discharge gases or release
not more than 0.8 ibs Part/1000 Ibs
discharge gas.
No partlcuiate emissions such as to
cause a nuisance and at least 90!
collection efficiency for fugitive dust.
0.10 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas for new
foundries and existing foundries in
critical areas 0.25 lbs/1000 Ibs eas
for existing foundries
0.40 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas
0.40 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas for 0-10
tons/hr plant capacity
0.25 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas for 11-20
tons/hr plane capacity
0.15 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas for > 21
tons/hr plant capacity
0.40 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas
Remove 85% by weight of all partlculate
not more than 0.4 gr Part/set of gas.
Remove 852 by weight of all partlculate
matter in discharge gases or release
not more than 0.4 gr. Part/scf of gas.
0.40 gr/scf of exhaust gas or
must be equipped with control
equipment which would collect not
less than 85! of the partlculate
matter entering the device.
0.45 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
0.2 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
for all existing foundry cupolas with a process weight £20,000 Ibs/hr; foundry cupolas
>20,000 Ibs/hr may not exceed general process weight rates.
for all existing jobbing cupolas
for all jobbing foundries after January 1, 1971.
proposed for existing jobbing foundries.
35
-------
TABLE VI
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO IRON AND STEEL PROCESSES
RATE OF ALLOWABLE EMISSION LBS PARTICULATE/HR
STATE
Illinois
Sinter Process
a) Breaker stack
b) main vlndbox
Iowa
Metallurgical
melting
a) cupolas*
b) elec. furnaces
Michigan
Open hearth fur.
Basic Oxygen fur.
Electric furnaces
Sintering plants
Blast furnaces
Heating & reheating
furnaces
New Hampshire
new furnaces
existing furnaces
Pennsylvania
Iron Production
Sintering-Windbox
Steel Production
Scarfing
Wisconsin
Electric furnaces
Open Hearth Fur.
Basic Oxygen Fur.
Blast Furnaces
Heating & Pre-
heating furnaces
PROCESS WEIGHT (LB/HS)
1000
1.75
2.58
2.58
3.17
5000
7.58
7.58
9.35
10,000
6.00
12.00
12.00
14.85
20,000
8.70
19.20
19.20
23.62
40,000
12.50
30.50
-
50,000
14.00
35.40
-
REGULATION
1.2 times allowable emission races
for Breaker stacks
Shall not exceed 0.1 gr/scf of exhaust
gas
0.15 Ibs Fart/1000 Ibs gas
0.15 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas
0.15 Ibs Fait/1000 Ibs gas
0.20 Ibs Fart/1000 Ibs gas
0.15 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas
0.15 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas
0.30 Ibs Part/1000 Ibs gas
not in excess of 0.02 gr/scf or
A-0.76 (F x W)'*Z
where A - allowable emissions In Ibs/hr
F - process factor in Ibs/unlt
as shown below
W - changing rate la unlts/hr
F - 100 Ibs/ton of product
F • 20 Ibs/ton of dry solids feed
F - 40 Ibs/ton of product
F - 20 Ibs/ton of product
0.10 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
0.20 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
0.10 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
0.20 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
0.30 Ibs dust/1000 Ibs gas
for all new foundry cupolas and all existing foundry cupolas with a process weight >20,000 Ibs/hour
-------
TABLE VII
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ASPHALT BATCHING
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR
ARKANSAS
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
IDAHO
PERMANENT
LOCATIONS
TEMPORARY
LOCATIONS
IOWA
MASSACHUSETTS
EXISTING PLANTS
NEW PLANTS
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
10.000
10
12.0
20.000
16
19.2
50,000
31
35.4
100,000
33
44,6
200,000
37
51.2
9.0
4.5
300,000
40
13.44
6.7
500,000
47
22.6
11.3
i600,000
50
28.3
14.2
REMARKS
ASPHALT MIX PLANT EQUIPMENT MAY NOT tMIT IN
EXCESS OF 1000 LBS/DAY OR 100 LBS/HR; MUST
BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO CAUSE A CONDITION OF
AIR POLLUTION OR A NUISANCE.
NO EMISSIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER IN EXCESS
OF 0.3 LBS/1000 LBS OF DISCHARGE CAS; MUST
NOT EMIT PARTICULATE MATTER INTO THE OPEN AIR
SO AS TO CAUSE A NUISANCE.
IF MORE THAN ONE STACK, THE EMISSION LIMITA-
TION WILL BE BASED ON THE TOTAL EMISSIONS
FROM ALL STACKS.
MUST HAVE A PARTICULATE COLLECTION SYSTEM
WITH AN EFFICIENCY OF AT LEAST 801. AND MUST
NOT EXCEED THE EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR
PERMANENT LOCATIONS.
PARTICULATE MATTER DISCHARGED TO THE ATMDS-
PHERE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0. 15 GR/SCF OF
EXHAUST GAS
(ft
-------
TABLE Vtl (CON I'D)
I'ARTICULATE KKCULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ASPHALT BATCHING (CONTINUED)
MICHIGAN
STATIONARY
PORTABLE IN
REMOTE LOCATION
WAYNE COUNTY
COMBUSTION
PROCESSES
NON- COMBUSTION
PROCESSES
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LB/I1R)
10,000
10
10
10
20 ,000
16
15
15
50,000
31
31
31 at
60.000
LB/HR
100 ,000
33
33
33
200,000
37
37
37
300.000
40
40
40
500,000
47
47
40
.1600,000
47
50
40
REMARKS
PARTICUUATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCKll) 0.30
LBS/1000 LBS GAS.
PLANT CAPACITY EMISSION LIMITATION
(TONS/HR) LBS/1000 LBS GAS
1-100 0.60
101-150 0.50
151-200 0.45
200 AND OVER 0.35
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED
0.65 LBS/1000 LBS GAS <» 150Z TOTAL AIR.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED
0.65 LBS/1000 LBS CAS.
IF PUNT IS EQUIPPED WITH MORE THAN ONE STACK,
THE EMISSION RATE WILL BE BASED ON THE TOTAL
EMISSIONS FROM ALL STACKS. MUST HAVE A
FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL SYSTEM. DURING OPERA-
TION VISIBLE EMISSION SHALL NOT EXCEED 201
OPACITY.
IF MORE THAN ONE STACK, THE MAXIMUM STACK
EMISSION RATE APPLIES TO THE TOTAL OF THE
EMISSIONS FROM ALL STACKS.
IF PLANT HAS MORE THAN ONE EMISSION POINT. THE
EMISSION TOTAL IS THAT FROM ALL EMISSION
POINTS.
-------
TABLE VII (CONT'D)
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ASPHALT BATCHING (CONTINUED)
NORTH CAROLINA
OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA CITY
OREGON
SPECIAL CONTROL AREAS
PENNSYLVANIA
SOUTH CAROLINA
EXISTING PLANTS
NEW PLANTS
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
10,000
10
10
10
-
20,000
13
16
16.19
50,000
20
31
3*. 3
30 AT
40,000
22 AT
40,000
100 ,000
27
33
40.0
45
31
200,000
37
37
40.0
57
38
300 ,000
42
40
40.0
67
45
500,000
52
47
40.0
^600.000
60
50
40.0
REMARKS
ALL HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANTS SHALL BE EQUIPPED
WITH A FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL SYSTEM.
MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH A FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL
SYSTEM.
ALL DUSTS AND CASEOUS EFFLUENTS COLLECTED
FROM THE PLANT MUST BE SUBJECTED TO AIR
CLEANING DEVICES HAVING A PARTICULATE COLLEC-
TION EFFICIENCY OF 801 BY WEIGHT.
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 CR/SCF OR
A - 0.76 (FXW)-112 WHERE
A - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS' IN LBS/HR
W - CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR
F - 3 LBS/TON OF AGGREGATE FEED
FOR ALL PLANTS AFTER JULY 1, 1977 - MUST BE
EQUIPPED WITH A FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL SYSTEM
WHICH WILL REDUCE TO A MINIMUM THE EMISSION
OF PARTICULATE MATTER FROM ANY POINT OTHER
THAN THE STACK OUTLET.
OJ
eo
-------
TABLE VII (CONCLUUEU)
PARTICULATE KtCULATlONS APPLICABLE TO ASPHALT BATCHING (CONCLUDED)
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
VIRGIN ISLANDS
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
10,000
10
10
10
20,000
16
16
16
SO. 000
31
31
31
100,000
33
33
33
200 ,000
37
37
37
300,000
40
40
40
500,000
47
47
47
2600,000
50
50
50
REMARKS
ALL ASPHALT BATCH PLANTS SHALL UTILIZE BEST
PRACTICAL TECHNOLOGY AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED
AND OPERATED TO MINIMIZE EMISSIONS.
EMISSIONS MAY NOT EXCEED 40 LBS OF
PARTICULATE/HR.
VISIBLE EMISSIONS LIMITED TO 20X OPACITY. IF
MORE THAN ONE STACK TO A PLANT. THE EMISSION
LIMITATIONS WILL BE BASED ON THE TOTAL
EMISSIONS FROM ALL STACKS. PLANTS MUST BE
EQUIPPED WITH FUGITIVE DUST CONTROLS.
EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.3 LBS
DUST/1000 LBS OF GAS.
IP PLANT HAS MORE THAN 1 STACK, THE EMISSION
TOTAL IS THAT FROM ALL STACKS. PLANTS MUST
HAVE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL SYSTEMS.
-------
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONCRETE BATCHINO
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LtS PARTICULATE/HOUR
LONXEC-TICUT
FLORIDA
PORTLAND CEMENT
ILLINOIS
PORTLAND CEMENT
INDIANA
10I.-A
CEME'.T KILSS
PORTLAND fCIECT
••JUYL.V.D
HU'tlraiK CONCRETE
•I1CH1CAN
KIL'
CLINKER COOLERS
GRINDING, CRUSIIINC,
AND OTHER HANDLING
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
100
0.55
1000
2.23
5000
6.34
— • "
10,000
9.73
20.000
14.99
(0 .000
60.000
29.60
120.000
93.28
200.000
36.11
1,000,000
46.72
REMARKS
PROCESS MUST NOT EMIT PARTICULATE
NATTER INTO THE OPEN AIR SO AS TO
CAUSE A NUISANCE; MUST BE EQUIPPED
WITH FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL FACIL-
ITIES HAVING A COLLECTION EFFICIENC
OF 901 OR 0.02 LBS/YD3 OF CONCRETE.
WHICHEVER RESULTS IN LESS EMISSION.
APPLIED TO EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE
RATHER THAN APPLIED ON THE BASIS
OF HASS EMISSION LIMITATIONS.
FOR NEU SOURCES >2SO MILLION BTU/HK
VISIBLE EMISSION SHALL NOT EXCEED
101 OPACITY. PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED INTO THE
ATMOSPHERE FROM FEED TO KILN. PAR-
TICULATE EMISSIONS INTO THE ATMOS-
PHERE niOH ANY CLINKER COOLER SHALL
NOT EXCEED 0.1 LBS/TON OF FEED TO
THE KILN.
EXISTING CEMENT MANUFACTURING
OPERATIONS EOIIPPED WITH ELECTRO-
STATIC PRFX IPITATi'R',. SAO FILTERS,
OR EQUIVALENT l,A:>-i.l.tANI)ii~, DEVICES
SHALL BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE
PARTICIPATES ACCORDINC TO
E • 8. 6 P0-" FOR P • 30 l"Ss 114
E - 15.0 P0'5 FOR P > 30 ros-'HB
SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AIR POLLU-
TION CONTROL DEVICES TO REDUCE
PARIICULATE EMISSIONS TO NO MORE
THAN 0.31 OF THE PARTICULATE HATTEK
ENTERING THE CONTROL DEVICE.
REGARDLESS OF THE EFFICIENCY. PAR-
TICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED
0.1 GR/SCF OF EXHAUST CAS.
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE BATCHING
PLANTS SHALL SOT DISCHARGE PARTIC-
ULATE MATTER IN EXCESS "F 0.1
GR/SCF OF EXHAUST CAS.
FOR EXISTING AND MODIFIED ISS1*LLJ-
IIONS LOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING
AQCR'S:
CUMBEJU-AND-KEYSER. SOUTHERN MD..
CENTRAL MARYLAND. EASTERN SHORE.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL SOT
EXCEED 0.03 GR/SCF OF EXHAUST CAS.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL *>T
EXCEED 0.2S LBS/1000 LBS CAS.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL SOT
EXCEED 0.30 LBS/1000 LBS CAS.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT
EXCEED 0.15 LBS/1000 LBS CAS.
THE ABOVE APPLY TO KILNS WITH
CAPACITY > 15, 000 BARRELS OF CEMENT
PER DAY.
41
-------
TABLE VIII (CONCLUDED)
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONCRETE BATCHING
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
PENNSYLVANIA
CL INKER PROSUCTION
CLINK W COOLIMC
SOUTH CAROLINA
VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
NEl.' CEMENT KILNS
NEW CLINKER COOLERS
EXISTING CEMENT KILNS
EXISTING CLINKER
COOLERS
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
100
0.55
1000
2.58
5000
7.58
10.000
12.0
20,000
14
19.2
40,000
22
30.5
60.000
94 AT
50.000
LBS/HR
29
40.0
120,000
134 AT
100,000
LBS/HR
42
46.3
200,000
190
47
51.3
1,000.000
284 AT
450,000
LBS/HR
69.0
REMARKS
VISIBLE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED
201 OPACITY
CEMENT KILNS SHALL NOT EMIT PARTIC-
ULATE MATTER IN EXCESS OP 230 MC/M
OF EXHAUST GAS
CEMENT KILNS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WIT
CAS CLEANING DEVICES TO REDUCE PAR-
TICULATE MATTER ENTERING THE DEVIC!
BY NOT LESS THAN 99. 71. PARTICULAR
MATTER DISCHARGED TO THE ATMOSPHEF'
SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.327 LBS/BARREL.
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 CR/SCF OR
A - 0.76 (FXW)'1*2 WHERE
A - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/HR
W - CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR
F - PROCESS WEIGHT FACTOR IN LBS/l
AS SHOWN BELOW
F - 150 LBS/TON OF DRY SOLIDS FEED
F - 50 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
0.30 LBS/TON OF FEED TO KILN
0.10 LBS/TON OF FEED TO KILN
0.20 LBS/ 1000 LBS OF GAS
0.30 LBS/ 1000 LBS OF GAS
42
-------
TABLE IX
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FEED AND GRAIN PROCESSING
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR
ILLINOIS
CORN WET HILLING
NEW SOURCES
EXISTING SOURCES
IOWA
FEED GRINDING &
MIXING PLANTS
(FOR ANIMAL FOOD)
GRAIN PROCESSING
PLANTS
(FOR HUMAN FOOD)
MARYLAND
GitAIN LRYINC
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
100
0.55
0.55
1.000
1.75
2.58
10,000
6.00
12.00
20.000
8.70
19.20
40 ,000
12.50
30.50
60,000
15.60
40.00
200.000
29.50
51.20
1,000,000
70.00
69.00
REMARKS
EMISSION OF PARTICULATE MATTER NOT TO EXCEED
0.3 GRAINS/SCF OF EFFLUENT GASES
ON AND AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1973
ON AND AFTER DECEMBER 31. 1973
A PERMANENT INSTALLATION FOR THE HANDLING,
DRYING, GRINDING. MIXING. OR PROCESSING OF
GRAIN, OR BLENDING OF GRAIN PRODUCTS, SHALL
NOT DISCHARGE PARTICULATE MATTER TO EXCEED
0.1 GR/SCF OF EXHAUST GAS.
EQUIPMENT FOR HANDLING, DRYING, GRINDING,
MIXING, OR PROCESSING GRAIN, OR BLENDING OF
GRAIN PRODUCTS. SHALL NOT DISCHARGE PARTICULATt
MATTER TO EXCEED 0.1 GR/SCF OF EXHAUST GAS.
GRAIN DRYING INSTALLATIONS MVST BE EQUIPPED SO
THAT ALL EXHAUST GASES DISCHARGED PASS THROUGH
A 50-MESH SCREEN, OR MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH
OTHER EQUIPMENT OR DESIGN FEATURES THAT WILL
ACCOMPLISH THE SAME OR MORE EFFECTIVE RESULTS
IN REDUCING PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. THIS
REGULATION DOES NOT APPLY TO MOBILE SOURCES.
-------
TABLE IX (CONCLUDED)
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FEED AND GRAIN PROCESSING (CONCLUDE! )
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR
PENNSYLVANIA
LOADING t UNLOADING
OF GRAIN ELEVATORS
GRAIN SCREENING
AND CLEANING
GRAIN DRYING
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
GfAIN ELEVATORS
WISCONSIN
PROCESSING OR
HANDLING
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
100
1.000
10.000
20.000
40 .000
60,000
200.000
1,000,000
REMARKS
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 CR/SCF OR
A - 0.76 (FXW)-1'2 WHERE
A - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/HR.
W - CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR.
F • PROCESS WEIGHT FACTOR IN LBS /UN IT
AS SHOWN BELOW
F - 90 LBS/TON OF GRAIN
F - 300 LBS/TON OF GRAIN
F - 200 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
FOR OPERATIONS INVOLVING PHYSICALLY CONNECTED
DISSIMILAR PROCESSES. THE PROCESS WEIGHT RATE
ENTRY SHALL BE THE SUM OF THE PROCESS WEIGHT
RATES OF EACH DISSIMILAR PROCESS. BUT
MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE
CONSIDERED PROCESSES.
EMISSIONS MAY NOT EXCEED «0 LBS PART/KR AND
HAY NOT INTERFERE UNREASONABLY WITH THE USE
AND ENJOYMENT OP OTHERS' PROPERTY UPON WHICH
THE MATERIAL MAY BECOME DEPOSITED. ADDI-
TIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FOR
ELEVATORS LOCATED IN SENSITIVE AREAS.
EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.4 LBS DUST/1000
LBS OF GAS.
-------
TABLE X
PAIUIC>,i. i. t REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO SECONDARY NON-FERROUS OPERATIONS
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR
DELAWARE - Al
MASSACHUSETTS
Al, Pb, Zn. Cu
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Al, Pb, Zn, Cu
NEW INSTALLATIONS
EXISTING
INSTALLATIONS
PENNSYLVANIA
Al SWEATING
Al MELTING & REFININ
Pb SMELTING
Zn SWEATING
Zn REFINING
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/HR)
1000
0.75
2.58
3.17
10,000
7.50
12.00
14.85
20,000
15.00
19.20
23.62
l
40,000
30.00
-
-
50 ,000
37.50
40.0 FOI
60,000
49.31
FOR
60,000
200,000
-
51.20
61.53
1,000,000
-
69.0
82.75
REMARKS
0.10 LBS PART/1000 LBS CAS FOR NEW NON-
FERROUS FOUNDRIES. 0.15 LBS PART /I 000 LBS
CAS FOR EXISTING NON-FERROUS FOUNDRIES.
WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE, 0.02 GR/SCF OR
A - 0.76 (FXW)0-1*2 WHERE
A • ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/HR
W • CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR
F - PROCESS FACTORS AS BELOW
F - 50 LBS /TON OF Al PRODUCT
F • 10 LBS /TON OF Al FEED
F - 0.5 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
F • 0.01 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
F - 0.3 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
4k
C7I
-------
TABLE XI
PAKT1CULATK RF.GULATIONS APPLICABLE TO PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER OPERATIONS
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS PARTICULATE/HOUR
DELAWARE
PRILLING
PRILLING
NORTH CAROLINA
PENNSYLVANIA
VIRGINIA
PROCESS WEIGHT RATE (LBS/IIR)
5.000
25
5
10.000
50
10
15,000
75
15
:o ,000
100
20
19
25.000
125
25
19.2 AT
30,000
50 .000
250
50
23 AT
40,000
LBS/HR
30.5 AT
60,000
75,000
375
75
29 AT
80,000
LBS/HR
100 ,000
500
100
31
42.5 AT
120,000
REMARKS
REGULATION APPLIES AFTER JANUARY 1. 1975 ONLY
IF BETWEEN JULY 1, 1973 AND OCTOBER 1, 1974.
THE SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD IS
EXCEEDED IN METROPOLITAN PHILADELPHIA AQCR
DUE TO PRILLING OPERATIONS LOCATED IN NEW
CASTLE CO.
THE PROCESS-WEIGHT RATE FOR CHEMICAL FERTILI-
ZER MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS SHALL BE THE SUM
OF PRODUCTION RATE AND RECYCLE RATE.
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 CR/SCF OR
A - 0.76 (FXW) -112 WHERE
A - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/HR
W - CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR
F - 6 LBS/TON OF PHOSPHOROUS BURNED
-------
TAI1I.K XII
I'AIU ICUI AIL Kl.l,UI..\l IONS AI'PLICAKI L TO I'LIRUIIUM IIIKIMM, <>l'l *A1 I
Al.l ilUAIll I EMISSIONS IN [.US I'AKI H UI.AI L/M'H'K
DELAWARE
CATALYTIC
CRACKING
CATALYTIC
CRACKING
FLUID COKIN',
ILLINOIS
CATALYST
REGENERATORS
INDIANA
CATALYTIC
CRACKING
PENNSYLVANIA
CATALYTIC
CRACKING
VIRGINIA
CATALYTIC
CRACKING
WASHINGTON
CATALYTIC
CRACKING
7 ,000
50
5
15 AT
5,000
i-Roci ss wi u.in RAII: (LBS/IIK)
1 . ,001)
100
10
50 AT
15,000
_"i ,()()()
150
r>
70 AT
15,000
JS.OOO
200
20
•«! , 000
300
30
125 AT
40,000
•ih.OOO
400
-.0
1 50 AT
50,000
70,000
500
50
REMARKS
Kf.f.l'LATIOS APi'LIES AFTER JANUARY 1, 1S75
ON'LY IF BU'WtfS Jl'LY 1, 197J AND OCTOBER 1,
1974. THE NATIONAL SECONDARY AIR QUALIFY
STANDARD IS FXC EtULU IN MJ. FRO. PH1IADH.PMIA
AiJCR DUE TO A CATALYTIC CRACKING Off.kATIUN
IN NEW CASTLE CO.
EMISSION RATE SHALL SOT EXOK.H 100 LBS OF
PARTICLI.AIE/HOUR. ALIOWABLF RATE SHALL Bt
DETERMINED BY:
E - 4.10(P)°-67 FOR P i30 TONS/HOUR
E - (55- "• WHtRf
A - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/IIK.
W • CHARCINC. RATE IN UN11&/HR.
F - 40 LBS'TON OF LI-n'H> KEH). |
L>:ISSIONS MAY NOT EXCEED 0.05X OF THE
RATE OK CATALYST RtClKcLLATlON WITHIN
I HE UNIT.
IHISilONs M,\V NOT EXIHI) -'I LBs l',\Kl;Hk AMI
MAY SOI INTEHI-IK! I'NKt A .ONAHI.'l WIIH 1HL I'SI
ANIt KNIOYMI-N1 OF OTHERS' I'KOI'IKH I'l'HM WHllll
THf MATFKIA1 MAY UK OMI DH'OSITED.
-------
TABLE XIII
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO COAL CLEANING PROCESSES
REGULATION
PENNSYLVANIA
COAL DRYING
COAL DRY-CLEANING
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 GR/SCF OR
A 0.76 (FXW) -1*2 WHERE
A - ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/HR
W CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR
F PROCESS WEIGHT FACTOR IN LBS/UNIT AS SHOWN BELOW
F 2 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
F 2 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
VIRGINIA
THERMAL DRYING
COAL PREPARATION
PLANTS
FOR < 100 TONS/HR ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS SHALL BE
45 LBS PART/HR.
FOR > 200 TONS/HR ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS SHALL BE
105 LBS PART/HR.
PARTICULATE MATTER MAY NOT BE VENTED INTO THE OPEN AIR
FROM ANY AIR TABLE EXHAUST IN EXCESS OF 0.05 GR/SCF OF
EXHAUST GAS. ANY STACK VENTING AIR TABLE EXHAUST GASES
INTO THE OPEN AIR SHALL CONTAIN FLOW STRAIGHTENING
DEVICES OR A VERTICAL RUN OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO
ESTABLISH FLOW PATTERNS CONSISTENT WITH ACCEPTABLE STACK
SAMPLING PROCEDURES.
WEST VIRGINIA
THERMAL DRYERS
EXISTING
NEW
AIR TABLE OPERATION
VISIBLE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 20% OPACITY —
FOR <120,000 SCF/MIN
172,000 SCF/MIN
245,000 SCF/MIN
351,000 SCF/MIN
>500,000 SCF/MIN
FOR < 75,000 SCF/MIN
111,000 SCF/MIN
163,000 SCF/MIN
>240,000 SCF/MIN
0.12 GR/SCF.
0.11 GR/SCF.
0.10 GR/SCF.
0.09 GR/SCF.
0.08 GR/SCF.
0.10 GR/SCF.
0.09 GR/SCF.
0.08 GR/SCF.
0.07 GR/SCF.
PARTICULATE MATTER VENTED INTO THE OPEN AIR SHALL NOT
EXCEED 0.05 GR/SCF OF GAS.
48
-------
TABLE XIV
PARTICULATE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO LIME KILNS
IOWA
MICHIGAN
WAYNE COUNTY
ROTARY KILNS
OTHER KILNS
<£>
PENNSYLVANIA
WISCONSIN
REGULATION
KILNS FOR PROCESSING LIMESTONE SHALL NOT EMIT
PARTICULATE MATTER IN EXCESS OF 0.1 GR/SCF OF
EXHAUST GAS.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.20 LBS/1000 LBS
GAS.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.20 LBS/1000 LBS
GAS OR 99% BY WEIGHT COLLECTOR EFFICIENCY FOR NEW KILNS;
0.30 LBS/1000 LBS GAS OR 98.5% WEIGHT COLLECTOR
EFFICIENCY FOR EXISTING KILNS.
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.20 LBS/1000 LBS
GAS FOR NEW KILNS; 0.30 LBS/1000 LBS GAS FOR EXISTING
KILNS.
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 GR/SCF OR
A = 0.76 (FXW)-1*2 WHERE
A = ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IN LBS/HR
W = CHARGING RATE IN UNITS/HR
F = 200 LBS/TON OF PRODUCT
EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.2 LBS DUST/1000 LBS OF GAS,
-------
Akl I*...'I A 11 Kl '.HI ,\l ll»Ns Al'l'l M.ALI.I Til Kfi,M'I I'l'l I1
I IS/ION nt AIK-DHIIU *HU F I'l'I.P
\1 \ .* \
FLOR 1 DA
IIUIIO
HH'I SIANA
•1AINI
MISSISSIPPI
FXISTINl. Mil I.1-
SFW MILLS
NT!.1 MAMI'SHIRI
MU MEXICO
NORTH CAROLINA
•
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
SOUTH CARi'l IS*
V1SCINIA
KM"''VIK\ HIKNAil-
..0
BY IIIIY I1"!
4.0
•..0
i.O
i.O
i.O
3.0
i.n
B\ IL'H 1. 1"'S
2.75
H.O
LIHJ KIINS
1 .11
oY IUI.V I'JJi
1.0
1 .0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
BY JULY 1 , 1 1 7 5
f * 200 i BS/ION
OF PRODUCT
1.0
1.0
^1M1 TANKS
0.5
SY JULY 11)2
0.5
0.5
K>k A 2-HR SAMPLlNr. I'tKhli
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
BY ,11'LY' !, 1172
1.0
0. 75
tuta b"iLnii
u. <>
KIMAJO s
Ntll P. 1 Ki 1 >> riF 2 LBS I'APTllLlvMf FROM ALL
HI-iW IMT ,. WASHF-K VENTS. STORAGE TANKS,
IMCFSIH BFLIFF ANII HtCoVFRY SYSTEMS I •; nutT
OR SL1 M H Mll-1 '.
NOT IN IXOSS OF 3 LBS PART1CLILATE/ JOOO LBS
BLACK LlMLUR SOLIDS FFD FOR NFU SOl'RCEs AND
WIT LATI.lt TIIAN It'l.Y 1. 197, F"R EXKTIW.
snURct.s.
SItALL MINIMIZE PART KJULATF EMISSIONS BY Usl OF
MODFRN tDUIPMENT AND OPERATING PROCEDURES IN
ACCORDANCE UI r« BI.-.T CUHREHT TFCHNOLnr.Y . IN
NO CASE SHALL MISSIONS EX( EF.D FLDFRAl
MAflDAJibS FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES.
BASED ON EMILY AVERAGE.
0.6 LBS/TON OF AIR-DRIED KRAFT PULP.
NOT IN EXCESS OF 0.02 CR/SCF OR
A . O.'h (FXV) •"•' UHERE
A - ALLOWABLE MISSIONS IN LBS/HR
U • CHARC1NC RATE IN UN1TS/HR
F • PROCESS WEIGHT FACTOR IN
LBS /UN IT As SHOUN LEFT.
0.3 LBS/TON AIR-DRIED KIAFT FOR ALL SHAKER
TANK VFNTS.
-------
TABLE XVI
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VISIBLE EMISSION
-PARTICULATE-
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California^
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Dist. of Col.
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland11
Massachusetts
Michigan12
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri15
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
FUEL BURNING 1
% OPACITY
20
20
40
203
20
20
20
20
203
203
203
207
40
20
203
209
20
40
20
40
2013
40
203
203
20
20
203
2017
INCINERATION i
7. OPACITY
20
202
40
203
20
20
20
no visible dischar
20
203
203
203
30
40
20
20
20
20
20
no visible dischai
20
40
20
40
20
20
20
20
-
20
INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
% OPACITY
20
20
203
20
20
20
ges
no visible discharges
106
203
203
308
40
-
203
203»8
-
4010
ges
20
40
20i3
4014
203
203
20
2016
-
20
51
-------
TABLE XVI (CONT'D)
New Mexico
New York
N. Carolina
N. Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
S. Carolina
S. Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington '
West Virginia
Wisconsin29
Wyoming
A. Samoa
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
FUEL BURNING
X OPACITY
20
2018
203
203
20
20
2021
6022
20
203
2023
2024
2025
203
6026
20
203
2028
20
203
20
20
20
203
INCINERATION
% OPACITY
20
2018
20
20
20
2021
6022
20
203
20
202*
2025
20
6026
20
203
20
20
20
20
20
20
203
INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
2 OPACITY
20
2019
203
2020
20
20
2021
6022
20
203
20
202*
-
203
60 26
20
203
20
20
20 3
20
20
20
203
52
-------
TABLE XVI - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VISIBLE EMISSIONS
when presence of uncombined water is the only reason for failure of
emissions to meet limitation, these requirements shall not apply
2
for incinerators installed on or after July 1, 1972; 40% for incinerators
installed prior to July 1, 1972.
for new equipment; 40% for existing equipment
4
each county has its own regulations
for sulfuric acid plants and nitric acid plants
for new Portland Cement Plants, new nitric acid plants, new sulfuric
acid plants; 40% for existing conical burners
for new sources >250 million BTU/hr capacity; 30% for existing sources
a
10% for new Portland Cement
9
for Priority I regions; 40% for Priority II and III regions
those processes that have been given a longer time to comply with
particulate emission standards shall be exempt until that particulate
emission standard must be complied with
for Baltimore AQCR and National Capital AQCR only; for Western Md.
AQCR, Central Md. AQCR, Southern Md. AQCR, and Eastern Shore AQCR;
20% opacity for existing fuel burning sources and incinerators and
no visible emissions for new sources, and for existing or modified
bituminous concrete manufacturing plants
12
also applies to Wayne County
13
for new installations and 60% for existing installations
14
60% shall be permitted from soot blowing operations
also applies to Kansas City
copper smelter exempted
^for >200 million BTU/hr capacity, no visible emissions are allowed
for sources with <200 million BTU/hr capacity.
18
for a period of 3 or more minutes during any continuous 60 minute
period, 40% for any time period for N. Y. City, Nassau and Westchester
Go's.
53
-------
TABLE XVI - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO VISIBLE EMISSIONS (CONT'D)
19
for charging coke ovens after December 31, 1974.
20
except for those processes, such as oil field service and drilling
operations, where it may not be technically feasible to meet this
specification.
21
for new sources and existing sources in Columbia-Willamette area,
Willamette Valley, Lane Regional area, Mid-Willamette Valley, Umpaqua
Basin, Rogue Basin, incorporated cities of 4000 or more people (and
within 3 miles of the corporate limits of any such city) 40% for all
other existing sources
22
20% for a period or periods aggregating more than 3 minutes in any one
hour
23
wood waste burners may exceed this limitation
24
for sources constructed after August 9, 1969; 40% for sources
constructed on or before August 9, 1969; 20% for all sources after
August 9, 1975
25
for sources beginning construction after January 31, 1972; 30% for
existing sources
26
40% for more than a period or periods aggregating 6 minutes in any hour
27
40% for sources in Puget Sound
28
from September 1, 1972 until June 30, 1975 for units not meeting
weight emission standards and 10% opacity thereafter; 10% for units
meeting weight emission standards
29
for all new sources and for existing sources in the Milwaukee and
Lake Michigan AQCR's; 40% for existing sources in the rest of the state
54
-------
TABLE XVII
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO STATED SOURCES
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA4
COLORADO3
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COL.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA!*
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN1-9
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA.25
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON34
WEST VIRGINIA3*
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICA SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISLANDS
SULFURIC ACID PLANTS
MIST
LBS/TON
1002 ACID
0.5
3
0.157
0.15
0.15
0.5^2
0.513
0.15U
0.7
.1520
0.5
3
0.18
1.8822
0.5
0.5
0.15
0.5
0.5
0.528
32
0.9
0.15
S02
LBS S02/TON
1002 ACID
6.5
3
6.5
5
4.08
4.08
4.010
6.512
30. D*3
4.015
6.5
4.018
6.5
4.021
3
26.624
27.0
6.5
4.0
6.5
, 10.027
4.029
30
32
27.033
30. 036
4.0
4.0
6.5
SULFUR RECOVERY
PLANTS
LBS S/LB
INPUT
.161
3
0.01
6
0.01
.01
0.06
0.01
23
0.01
0.01
26
31
32
0.05
0.06
0.05
NITRIC ACID
PLANTS
LBS NO /TON
1002 ACID
5.5
7
5.52
5.5
3.0
3.09
3.010
5.5
5.8
3.016
6.5
5.517
5.5
5.5
9.0
5.8
5.5
3.0
5.5
5.5
5.8
3.037
5.5
55
-------
TABLE XVII - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO STATED SOURCES (CONT'D)
for existing sulfur recovery plants; 0.08 Ibs S/lb input for new plants
2
3
2
for existing sources; 3.0 Ibs NO- /ton of weak acid (30-70% strength)
only ground level standards given
4
each county has its own regulations
1000 ppm by volume for existing plants; 500 ppm by volume for new plants
2000 ppm by volume
for new plants only, no regulation stated for existing plants
Q
for new plants only; 10 Ibs SO- /ton 160% acid for existing plants
q ^
for new plants; 10 Ibs NO 2/ ton 1002 acid for existing plants
for new plants only; no regulation given for existing sulfuric acid plants;
5.5 Ibs NO/ton 100% acid for existing nitric acid plants
East Chicago:
Sulfuric Acid Plants 6.5 Ibs SO. /ton 100% acid
0.5 Ibs/ton 100% acid
12
after January 1, 1974 for mist; after January 1, 1975 for SO,
13
per ton of 98% acid
14
for new plants only; 0.9 Ib/ton 100% acid for existing plants
for new plants only; 27.0 Ibs S09/ton 100% acid for existing plants
16
for new plants only; 5.8 Ibs N09/ton 100% acid for existing plants
17
for the Metropolitan Baltimore AQCR and the National Capital AQCR only,
for existing plants only; 3.0 Ibs NO, /ton 100% acid for new plants
18
for all AQCR's, for new plants only; 27.0 Ibs S02/ton 100% acid for
existing sulfuric acid plants
19
these regulations are for Wayne County, no regulations were stated for
the state
20
for new plants only; 1.7 Ibs/ton 100% acid for existing plants
21
for new plants only; 6.5 Ibs SO, /ton 100% acid for existing plants
22 *
converted from Ibs/hr
23
15,000 ppm by volume at standard conditions
24
for new plants only; 40 Ibs S00/ton 100% acid for existing plants
25
for new plants only; no regulations stated for existing plants
56
-------
TABLE XVII - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO STATED SOURCES (CONT'D)
according to A-0.32E * where E-plant rating in longtons S/day
and A«allowable emissions in Ibs S0_/lb S input
274.0 Ibs S09/ton 100% acid by July 1, 1977
28
for existing plants only; 0.15 Ibs/ton 100% acid for new plants
29
for new plants only; 6.5 Ibs S0_/ton 100% acid for existing plants
30
34.7 Ibs SO /hr/1000 scfm effluent flow rate for plants burning
other than elemental sulfur; 19.8 Ibs S02/hr/1000 scfm effluent flow
rate for plants burning elemental sulfur
31214 Ibs SO,/hr/1000 sfm effluent flow rate
32 L
80% control for new sources with uncontrolled emissions >250ton/year
of sulfur
33
when elemental sulfur is used; 45 Ibs SO./ton 100% acid when other
materials are used as feed
I/
Northwest APA: 20 Ibs S0,/ton 100% acid c -f . .. . a .
i n iv i*.*- in.\ v jj Sulfuric acid plants
1.0 Ibs/ton 100 % acid
35by June 30, 19 75
36
when elemental sulfur is used; 40 Ibs S02/ton 100% acid when other
materials are used as feed
37
for new or modified plants only
57
-------
TABU XVIil
I ROM f IIN/H IVNS 1975 W GUIATION^ AI'PI ICABIE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES -
ALLOWABLE IMIS< KM IRS so, ic6Biu
ALABAMA
CLASS 1 CuUNTI
1 LASS, (I tul'SlY
AI.AbkA
AH 1 .1UNA
MAKlLOPA COUNTY
P1MA COL'NTY
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAUAF.E
NEU CASTLE CO.
1 I LL L Pll IAI ION ,S
(I US. S/106 Bill )
OIL
0.5
0.)
LOA1
0.5
O.J
IIKAI NKUI {MILLION IIH/HKI
; 1U
< iU
100
- 2bU
• JSO
1000
• 2000
ALL
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.0
0.3
0.55
REMARKS
H>K NEW SOIHCU ONLY.
CLASS I CO.: 501 OR LESS OF THE COUNTY POPULATION
RESIDES IN A NUN- IK BAN PLACt. AS DIF1NLD BY THE
U.S. [)EPT. 01 (.OWQ.KCL CENSUS BUREAU FOR 1970 OR A
SLCOMMRY NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD IS
BUM, LXCtlDtD BASED ON 1971 AIR qfALlTY MEASURE-
MINTS
CLASS 11 CO.: MORt THAN 50* OF ALL COUNTY POPULA-
TION REblDLS IN A NON-URBAN PLACE, AND NO SECONDARY
NATIONAL AMB1LM1 AIR QUALITY STANDARD IS BEING
LXILLLLD BASED ON 1971 AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS.
NOT TO
CAUSE GRUUND LIVEL COMCENTKATIONS TO EXCEED THEIR
LIH1TATIUNS.
SAKE AS STATL REGULATIONS.
SAME AS STATE REGULATIONS.
NOT TO CAUSE GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS TO
EXCEED THEIR LIMITATIONS.
EACH OF THE SO COUNTIES IN CALIFORNIA
HAS ITS OWN REGULATIONS.
THt STATL OF COLORADO REGULATION COVERS THE
METROPOLITAN DENVER AQCR, THIS LIMITATION APPLIES
AFTER JANUARY 1, 1975, BUT UNTIL THEN THE
REGULATION IS 1.0 LBS S02/106 BTU.
AFTER APRIL 1, 197J
STATE REGULATION: S02 EMISSIONS SHALL BE CONTROLLED
TO MEET THE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS.
AFTER JANUARY 1, 1975 IF NATIONAL SECONDARY AMBIENT
AIR QUALITY STANDARD HAS BEEN EXCEEDED IN METROPOL-
ITAN PHILADELPHIA AQCR. BETWEEN JULY 1, 1973 AND
OCTOBER 1. 19T-. OTHERWISE:
DISTILLATE OIL 0.31 AFTER JANUARY 1, 1972
ALL OTHLK FULL l.OZ AFTER JANUARY 1, 1973
CD
-------
TABLE XVIII (CONT'D)
FROM FINAL PLANS - 1975 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS IBS S0?'106 BTU
KENT I SUSSEX CO.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
UEOR.CLA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
CRAHITE CITY
COOK COUNTY
INDIANA
LAKE COUNTY
POSTER COUNTY
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
VICO COUNTY
ANDERSON
EAST CHICAGO
tVANSVILLE
GARY
FUEL LIM1
I S (LBS S,/
OIL
0.3 DISTILLATE
0.5
0.5
0.3 RESIDUAL
0.2 DISTILLAIE
1.0
TAT1ON
10* BTU)
COAL
0.5
0.7
1 0
•- 10
< 50
II LAI I
100
s
NPUT (HI
<2iO
LL10N BTU/
>2SO
0.8 OIL
1 . 2 COAL
0.8 OIL
1.2 COAL
1.2 COAL
U.8 RES1D
0. 3 D1ST.
1")
1000
•2000
ALL
6.0
REMARKS
EMISSION RATE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ACCEPTABLE
ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION EQUATIONS IN ORDER TO MEET
AIR QUALITY STANDARDS.
AFTER JULY 1. 1975 - UNTIL THEM 1J S FOR COAL;
FOR OIL 11 S UNTIL JULY 1, 197} AND 0.8Z S UNTIL
JULY 1. 197S.
FOR NEW SOURCES ONLY. REGULATIONS FOR EXISTING
SOURCES:
1.1 LBS S02/106 BTU FOR OIL I FOB >250 MILLION
1.5 LBS S02/106 BTU FOR COAL 1 BTU
FOR NEW SOL'PCES OStV . FOR EXI^TIV soL'PfFS LIMIT-
ATION IS A JUNCTION OF STACK HHCHT. KKAT INPUT.
LOCATION. FUEL USED. 2 bl S FOR COAL AND Oil FOR
Fm BURNING SOURCES <100 MILLION BTU/HR OF HUT
INPUT; 5.01 S FOR COAL AND OIL FOR FVF.I. BUHNlNi.
SOURCES '100 MILLI.'N eTL' OF HEAT INJTI
AHm JUNE 1. 1974 FOR FUEL BURNING SOURCES •i'tO
MILLION BTU/HR AND 2.01 S FOR FUEL BURNING SOURCES
<2iO MILLION BTU/HR.
THIS REGULATION IS BEINC DELETED, AND NEW 1 S
LIMITATIONS WILL BE SET BY THL STATE UI1II1N 1 YEAR
OF APPROVAL OF THE PLAN.
FOR NEW SOURCES ONLY; FOK EXIbTlNl. SOURCES AT ALL
HEAT INPUTS (OR CH,CACO
1.0 LBS S02/10' BTU FOR RESIDUAL OIL ST ^
O.J LBS S02/106 BTU FOR ULSTILLAIt Oil BU^LINCTOK
1.8 LBS S02/10' BTU FUR COAL. AQCR'l
SO, LMISSION-. MAY NOT CAUSE THE AMBIENT AIR TO
EXCEED ITS LIMITATION:, AT ANY .KLU'ItL PLACl
BEYOND THE I'KEMlStS ON U1IIC1I THE SOCRCE IS
LOCATED.
NO! IN EXCLbb at b.O LBS S0,/106 BTU OR
Lo-lJO-1 » micHlVES IS LESS. IN NO LASt
U1LI SIANUAJU. Of LESS THAN 1..' LBS
SO; /lOf1 BTU BE KEO.UIHEU.
NOT TO CAUSE OKOLNU LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS To EXCEED
THEIR LIMITATIONS.
"PROPOSED ORDINANCE U1IICH IS SIMILAR TO LAKE
COUNTY" 0 ,j
BUT NOT IN EXCESS OF £,,-17.00,0, (0, IS 1O1AL
EQU1PMENT CAPACir,)
LIMITAT IONS
NO 50^ RH.LLjHTlohs
SAME AS LAKE COUNTY
NO SO2 REGULATIONS
SAME AS 1-Ak.E CCIUNTY
CJ1
(O
-------
TABLE XVIII (CONT'D)
FROM FINAL PLANS - 1975 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS I RS S02/106 BTU
HAMMOND
INDIANAPOLIS
MICHIGAN CITY
WAYNE COUNTY
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
PRIORITY I
PRIORITY II
PRIORITY 111
LOUISIANA
MAINE
PORTLAND AQCR
CENTRAL MAINE
DOWNEAST
AROOSTOOK CO.
N.W. NALNE AQCR
MARYLAND
CUMBERLAM) MD. AQCR
BALTIMORE AQCR
NATIONAL CAPITAL AQCR
EASTERN SHORE AQCR
SOUTHER* SHORE AQCR
CENTRAL MD. AQCR
MASSACHUSETTS
CENTRAL MASS. AQtt
MXRRIMACK VALLEY AQCR
BOSTON AQCR
PIONEER VALLEY AQCR
S.E. MASS. AqCB
BERKSHIRE
FUEL LIMITATION
1 S (LBS S/10* BITU)
OIL
1.5
1 .5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
0.5 RESIDUAL
0.3 DISTILLATE
O.I RESIDUAL
0.3 DISTILLATE
0.5 RESIDUAL
0.3 DISTILLATE
O.S RESIDUAL
0.3 DISTILLATE
0.5 RESIDUAL
0.3 DISTILLATE
0.5 RESIDUAL
0.3 DISTILLATE
lO.n NO. 2 OIL\
^0. 55 OTHERS 1
/0.17 NO. 2 OIL.
10.55 OTHERS '
,0.17 NO. 2 OIU
(0. 28 OTHERS '
/0.17 NO. 2 OIL'
(0.55 OTHERS 1
/0.17 NO. 2 OIL;
U.55 OTHERS '
/0.17 NO. 2 DILI
>O.S5 OTHERS '
LOAL
1.5
1.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.;
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
(0.55)
(0.55)
(0.28)
(0.55)
(0.55)
(0.55)
HUT INI'l'l (MILLION BTl/HRI
• 10
4.0 COAL
2.5 OIL
4.0 COAL
2.5 OIL
4.0 COAL
2.5 OIL
<50
100
•250
•250
3.0
1 . 2 CUAI
0.8 ull.
1000
3.5 COAL
2.0 OIL
2000
ALL
5.0
LOAL
1.5
OIL
REMARKS
SAME AS LAKE LUUNIY
NO SO] REGULATIONS
SAME AS LAKE COUNT*
NO SOj REGULATIONS
PROPOSED REGULATION - AFTER JANUARY 1, 1974; AFTER
JANUARY 1, 1973:
b.O LBS S02/106 BTU tW COAL
2.0 LBS S0,/I0' BTU H)R OIL
2.0 COAL 1 F(J(| jgg MILLION BTU/HR
2000 pp>
UNTIL JULY 1, 1975, It S WILL APPLY TO RESIDUAL OIL.
UNTIL JULY 1, 1975, 11 S WILL APPLY TO RESIDUAL OIL.
SAME AS BALTIMORE
SAME AS BALTIMORE
SAME AS BALTIMORE
SAME AS BALTIMORE
FOR ARLINGTON. BELHONT, BOSTON, UtOOKLINE, CAMBRIDGE,
CHELSEA, EVERETT, MALDEN, MEDFORD. NEWTON. SOMMER-
VILLE, WALTHAM. WATERTOVN - FOR ALL OTHER
TOWNS t CITIES IN THIS AQCR: FOR COAL I OIL
0.55 LBS S/106 BTU
-------
TABLE XVIII (CONT'D)
FROM FINAL PLANS - 1975 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES -
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS LBS S02/106BTU
MICHIGAN
WAYSE COWTT
MINNESOTA
HIMIEAPOLIS - ST PAUL AQCR
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY
SPRIiiCFlELD-GREENE CO.
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
VASUOE CO.
CLAM CO.
NEW HAMPSHIRE
FUEL LIMITATION
I S (LBS S/10* nU)
OIL
2.0
1.5
0.} DISTILLATE
0.7 HEAVY 1 CRUDE.
2.0
2.0
2.0
(1.0)
1.0
1.0
0.4 NO. 2 OIL
1.0 NO.'i 4, 5.
1 6 OIL
COAL
2.0
1.5
0.5 PLANTS
0.3 RES., COM.
2.0
2.0
2.0
(1.0)
HEAT INPUT (MILLION BTU/HR)
:10
1.4
<50
100
<250
-250
1000
>2000
ALL
3.2 C
2.2 0
2.4 C
1.7 0
4. 8
2.3
2.0
REMARKS
£500.000 LBS STEAM PER HOUR BY JULY
1. 1975 FOR POWER PLANTS ONLY.
>SOO.OOO LBS STEAM PER HOUR BY JULY
1. 1975 FOR POWER PLANTS ONLY.
AFTER AUGUST 1, 197 5 - 1.2SI S FOR PULVERIZED COAL
FOR POWER PLANTS.
AFTER JUNE 1. 1974 - FOR FUEL BURNING SOURCES >250
MILLION BTU/HR I LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE MINNEAPOLIS
ST. PAUL AQCR.
AFTER JUNE 1 , 1974 FOR 2250 MILLION ITU/HI.
ANY INSTALLATIONS >250 MILLION BTU/HR WILL HAVE THE
FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:
AFTER JUNE 1. 1974 l.SJ S FOR OIL
AFTER JUNE 1. 1973 l.SX S I „„ „ ,
AFTER JUNE 1. 1972 2.01 si *"* COAL
2.4 LBS SOj/10* BTU FOR ANY MODIFIED FUEL BURNING
UNIT (MODIFIED MEANS A PHYSICAL CHANCE IN AN AIR
CONTAMINANT SOURCE WHICH INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF
ANY AIR POLLUTANT EMITTED OR RESULTS IN THE
EMISSION OF ANY AIR POLLUTANT NOT PREVIOUSLY
EMITTED).
STATE REGULATION INCLUDES ST. LOUIS METRO. AREA.
SOi EMISSIONS SHALL NOT CAUSE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
LIMITATIONS TO BE EXCEEDED AT ANY OCCUPIED PLACE
BEYOND THE PREMISES ON WHICH THE SOURCE IS LOCATED.
FOR EXISTING SOURCES; 0.5 LBS SOj/10* BTU FOR NEW
SOURCES. THIS REGULATION IS FOR SOURCES THAT BURN
FUEL PRIMARILY TO PRODUCE HEAT AMD WHERE THE SULFUR
COMPOUND EMISSION IS DUE PRIMARILY TO THE SULFUR
IN THE FUEL BURNED - FOR ALL OTHER SOURCES THE
REGULATION SHALL BE NOT TO EXCEED AMBIENT AIR
QUALITY LIMITATIONS.
NOT IN EXCESS OF THE FOLLOWING: •) DURING ANY COKSE-
CUTIVE 12 MONTH PERIOD. SULFUR OXIDES IN EXCESS OF
THE AMOUNT EMITTED DURING 1971 CALENDAR YEAR
t>> DURING ANY 24 HR. PERIOD, SULFUR OXIDES EXCEEDING
THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT EMITTED DURING ANY CONSECUTIVE
24 HR. PERIOD DURING 1971 CALENDAR YEAR.
0.105 X HEAT INPUT FOR >250 MILLION BTU/HR.
0.15« HEAT INPUT
AFTER OCTOBER 1, 1972
0>
-------
TABU XVIII ICONT'DI
FROM FINAL PLANS - 1975 REGULATION APPLICABLE TO FUEL BURNING SOURCES -
ALLOWABLE EMISSIONS LBS S02a06 BTU
NEW JERSEY
NJ-NY-ti^S A Kb
niUAUtl.I'MIA AO^k'S
NE PENN-l ITIK ULLAWAKt
AKL NJ IMkAblATI AgCK
NEW MEX1LO
AJ.BUQI.LKIJLL-BLKMAI.ILLO CO.
NtW YURJC
NJ-NY lONN AWLK
NIAGARA HiOMlLH AOCK
NUKIH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
PRIORITY I RLL10NS
PRIORITY ii REGIONS
PRIORITY III REGIONS
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
COLUMBIA-WILLAMETTE
HID WILLAMETTE
LAME REGIONAL
PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA
ALLEGHENY CO. , BEAVER VALLEY,
MONOCAHELA VALLEY. SE AIR BASIN
RHODE ISLAND
II 11 1 IHI1A1ION
* b (Lbs :,/io'' uri )
nil.
0.1 NO. : OIL
0. } NO. ., &
HEAVIER OIL
0. 1 NO. 2 till.
O.I Nil 4 OIL
1 (1 KO. i i
HLAVItR
(!.!>»
U. 1 Kt M IH AL
U..' DISI ILI.Alt
(U t>)
l.n RESIDUAL
0.) DISTILLATE
0.2 NO. 2 t LIGHTER
0.) NO. 44 HEAVIER
1.0
COAL
O.J
1.0 BITUMINOUS
0.7 ANTIIkALIIE
(2.00)
0. J
(1.4)
1.0
1.0
0.1
1.0
HUM INl'UI (MILLION I1U/HK)
• lu
• iO
3.0
1.0
IUO
• 210
1.4 OIL
l.b COA1
>250
0.3.
0.8 OIL
1 . 2 COAL
1000
•200U
1.8
0.6
ALL
1.6
3.0
1.0
1.6
3.1
0.)
OIL
2.0
COAL
1.0
REMARKS
HIUIIK I S COAL ANb OIL CAN UL USU> II II CAN
Bt DEMONSTRATED THAT THE SOj LMISSIONS CAJ. BE
LUW1KOLLLU SO AS MOT TO LXCIED 0.3 LBS
iO;/10^ BTL.
NO SO2 REGULATIONS
APT IK SFPT. 30. 19731 O.H S IOR DHT1LLATI AFTI R
SEPT. 30. 1974; AFTER OCT. 1, 1971 Pl'PL CANNciT
CONTAIN MOKF THAN 0.2 I.BS S/10° BTI' r.pnSS HMTCONTEm
Aprrn OCT. i. 1975 von i>n.: AFTER OCT. i
1974 HJR KIAL. EXCEPTIONS TO THF Sl'l.TOR LIMITA-
TIONS ARE ALLOUU IP SULFUR EMIS^I"N5 APF. MOT [N
EXCESS OF THOSf PRnVIDm BY TBF RL'l.t .
FOK NtU INSTALLATIONS ONLY; 2.1 LBS SOj/10' BTU FOR
EXISTING INSTALLATIONS; BY 1990, l.t. LBS SO /10* BTU
FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS.
REGIONS AR£: CINCINNATI. CLEVELAND. MARIETTA. N.U.
OHIO. STEUBENVILLE, TOLEDO, YOUNGSTOUN. ZAVESVILLE
UGIOHS Aki.. DAYTON. MAHSflELD-KARION
REGIONS AILL: COLUMIUS. rORTSMOmH-IRONTOM.
SAHDUSKY. WILHINCTON-CH1LLICOTIIE-LOCAN
AFTER JULY 1, 1975, FOR NEW LlgUID BURNING tqUIPMEKI
UNTIL THEN THE LIMITATION IS 0.9 LBS S02/10b BTU.
THIS COAL LIMITATION IS FOR NEW EflUlPMENT ONLY. ONLY
GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS ARE GIVEN FOR EXISTING
FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT.
THE RESIDUAL OIL RESTRICTION APPLIES AFTER JULY 1.
1974. UNTIL THEN THE RESTRICTION IS 2.SZ S
EMISSION LIMITATIONS APPLY TO KEW SOURCES ONLY
1000 pp.
1000 ppB
A-5.1E-°-'4lb./106 BTU FOR 50 < HEAT INPUTS2000
OIL REGULATIONS APPLY AFTER OCTOBER 1, 1971; COAL
REGULATIONS APPLY AFTER OCTOBER 1, 1972 - HIGHER
X S FUELS CAN BE USED WHEN EQUIPMENT OR PROCESSES
ARE USED TO REDUCE EMISSIONS.
A-1.7E"0'1* LBS/10* BTL FOR 50 f HEAT INPUT S 2000
|