Draft
 Do Not Quote or Cite
                                 External Review Draft No. 2
                                             February 1981
              Air  Quality  Criteria
           for Particulate  Matter
              and Sulfur  Oxides —


            Chapter 6: Atmospheric Transport,
              Transformation, and Deposition
[Chapter 6 Was Inadvertently Omitted from the Volume III Printing
                           NOTICE

This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally released by EPA and should not at this stage be
construed to represent Agency policy. It is being circulated for comment on its technical accuracy and
policy implications.
          Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
         Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
              Office of Research and Development
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711

-------
                              NOTE TO READER

     The Environmental  Protection Agency is revising  the  existing criteria
documents for participate matter and sulfur oxides (PM/SOX) under Sections 108
and 109 of  the  Clean Air Act, 42  U.S.C.  §§ 7408, 7409.   The first external
review draft of a revised combined PM/SO  criteria document was made available
for public comment in April 1980.
     The Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment Office  (ECAO) filled more than
4,000 public  requests  for  copies of the  first external review draft.  Because
all those who received copies of the first draft from ECAO will  be sent copies
of the  second external  review draft, there is no need to resubmit a request.
     To facilitate public  review,  the second external review draft  will  be
released in five volumes on a staggered schedule as the volumes are completed.
Volume I (containing Chapter 1), Volume II (containing Chapters 2, 3, 4, and 5),
Volume III (containing Chapters 6, 7, and 8), Volume IV (containing Chapters 9
and 10), and Volume V (containing Chapters 11, 12, 13, and 14) will be released
during January-February, 1981.   As noted earlier, they will be  released  as
volumes are completed, not in numerical order by volume.
     The first  external  review draft was  announced  in  the  Federal  Register  of
April 11, 1980 (45 FR 24913).  ECAO received and reviewed 89 comments from the
public, many of which were quite extensive.   The Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee  (CASAC)  of the  Science Advisory Board also provided  advice and
comments on the first external review draft at a public meeting of August 20-22,
1980 (45 FR 51644, August 4, 1980).
     As with the first external  review draft, the second external review draft
will be submitted to CASAC for its advice and comments.  ECAO is also soliciting
written comments  from  the  public on the second  external  review draft and
requests that an  original  and three copies  of all  comments be submitted to:
Project Officer for PM/SOX, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office,  MD-52,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.  C. 27711.   To
facilitate ECAO's consideration  of comments  on this  lengthy and  complex docu-
ment, commentators with extensive comments should index the major points which
they intend  ECAO  to  address, by providing  a list of the major points and a
cross-reference to the  pages in the document.  Comments should  be submitted
during  the  forthcoming  comment period, which will be announced in  the Federal
Register once all  volumes  of the second external review draft are available.

-------
                     6.  ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT, TRANSFORMATION, AND DEPOSITION

6.1  INTRODUCTION
     Preceding chapters of this criteria document  discussed  the  physical  and chemical  properi-
ties of sulfur oxides  and particulate matter  (Chapter  2);  their  sources and emissions  (Chapter
4)  and  measurements of  their ambient  levels  in  urban and  rural  environments.  (Chapter  5).
These chapters in part, addressed material  which  is  relevant to  portions of the subject matter
to  follow.    Whenever  possible reference  to  detailed  resource  material  in  previous  chapters
is made so long as clarity of presentation  is preserved.
     The  purpose  of  this  chapter  is  to  review  our   present  knowledge of  the  physical  and
chemical processes contributory to the  transport,  transformation  and  deposition of particulate
matter  and  sulfur  oxides  in  the atmosphere  and to  discuss the  theoretical  approaches  for
integrating these processes with source emission  contributions through the  use of mathematical
models.  Such  integrating approaches provide  a vehicle for improved understanding and  concept-
ualization  of the  complex  processes   operative  in polluted atmospheres,   and  through  these
source  receptor  relationships provide  a  means  to  a  sound,  creditable  scientific basis  for
determining the  nature and extent of emission control required  to meet  specified ambient  air
quality levels.
     The  concentration of a  pollutant  species  at  some fixed point  in  time  and  space  after
being  emitted from  a source  at  a  given  distance  away  is  dependent  upon  four fundamental
factors.  These  factors  are  as follows:   1)   emission—the  rate of  pollutant emitted and  the
configuration  of  its  source;  2)   transformation—the  chemical and  physical reaction processes
which convert  one  pollutant  species  to  another;  3)  transport and  diffusion—the movement  and
dilution of  a pollutant  species  through time  and space as  a  result  of  various meteorological
variables;  and 4)   deposition—the  removal of a pollutant   species  through  their interaction
with  land  and water  surfaces  (dry deposition) and  through   interaction with  precipitation or
cloud condensation nuclei (wet deposition).
     The principal  pathway  processes of airborne pollutants are schematically illustrated in
Figure  6-1.   Ideally each  of these processes  should be treated  explicitly  in the air quality
simulation model, but  this  is typically not the  case.  In  this chapter  three of the  factors,
transformation,  transport  and diffusion,  and  deposition  are  discussed  in  detail   as  they
constitute major theoretical  components of  the air quality simulation model.  Emissions, which
can be  viewed more  as a model input, are  discussed  only  in  the  context  of their relevancy to
air quality simulation modeling in the final section.
     It should be noted, that the  modeling approaches discussed within  this chapter  consider
explicit treatments of the dynamic physical  and chemical  processes  operative  in the atmosphere
to  simulate the relationship between pollutant emission and  ambient air quality.  More implic-
it  statistical-empirical  approaches,  which  deduce  source   contribution through  analysis  of
                                               6-1

-------
FREETROPOSPHERIC
    EXCHANGE
                                         VERTICAL
                                         DIFFUSION
                     AEROSOL
                  CONDENSATION

                  COAGULATION

               CHEMICAL REACTIONS
                                           ABSORPTION IN
                                          CLOUD ELEMENTS
         SEDIMENTATION
          AS AEROSOL
                     DRY DEPOSITION ON
                        THE GROUND
cnMD?cc   ANTHROPOGENIC  ^
bUUHLtb      cnnorcc     <«,>
                                   ,'//'/ ',/,»",'""/'/
                                  il i i '/// III It I 11 11 Hi I
ii i
                                            ABSORPTION IN
                                            PRECIPITATION
                                    WASHOUT IN PRECIPITATION
          Figure 6-1. Pathway processes of airborne pollutants.

          Source: Adapted from Drake and Barrager(1979).
                                  6-2

-------
empirical information only,  are  not within the purview of  this  chapter.   One specific techni-
que,  chemical  factor analysis,  has shown considerable  promise in  developing  source-receptor
relationships for particulate matter and is discussed in Chapter 5.
6.2  CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATION PROCESSES
     A detailed  discussion  of the  chemistry  of S02 and  that of other gases reacting  to form
particulate matter  in the  atmosphere has been presented  in  Chapter  2.   Section 6.2.1 provides
a  brief  summary of  the  results on  the atmospheric chemical  transformation processes  of  S02
and  particulate  matter  presented  in Chapter  2.    Section  6.2.2  reviews  the status  of field
measurements on  the rate of  SOj oxidation in  industrial  and urban plumes;  and  their contri-
bution to elucidating the transformation pathway processes of S02 oxidation.
6.2.1  Chemical Transformation of S02 and Particulate Matter
     Present understanding  of the  homogeneous  gas phase reactions  of S02  indicates  that  the
rate  of  S02  oxidation   in  the  atmosphere  is dominated  by  free  radical   reaction  processes.
The  free radical species  identified as  important contributors to  the S02  oxidation  process
are  hydroxyl  (HO),   hydroperoxy  (H02),  methylperoxy (CH302)  and other organic  peroxy species
(R02, R'02,  etc.).    The concentration  of  these   radicals  in  the  atmosphere are  dependent  on
many factors,  the more  important of which are the concentration of  volatile organic compounds
and  nitrogen oxides (NO and  N02)  in the  atmosphere,  temperature  and  solar  intensity.   Theo-
retical   estimates  have  shown  that  maximum  S02 oxidation  rates of 4.0%  h~l are possible  in
polluted atmospheres.   But, recent  experimental  rate  constant  determinations  for the  H02  and
CH302 reactions  with S02 indicate that  these processes  may not be  as  important  as  previously
thought   and that the maximum possible homogeneous  S02 oxidation rate  under optimum  atmospher-
ic conditions  may  only be  of  the  order of  1.5%  h~l.   This rate  is a result  of  S02 reaction
with hydroxyl  radical only.
     Present knowledge  of  heterogeneous pathways  to  S02 oxidation  in the  atmosphere  indic-
ates  that  the  liquid phase catalyzed oxidation  of S02 by  Mn  ion and carbon  are potentially
important  processes.   Theoretical  estimates of  atmospheric  S02 oxidation rates   via these
processes are  of the order  of 10%  h~l.   Unfortunately,  a great deal  of  uncertainty surrounds
the  actual  availability of these  catalyzing  substances in  ambient fine  particulate  matter.
The  quantitative determination of rates  of  S02 oxidation  via  these processes  has  never been
demonstrated under  actual atmospheric conditions.
     Organic and nitrate  particulate matter  forming  processes are  presently thought  to  be
dominated by homogeneous gas phase  reactions.   In the  case  of atmospheric nitrates,  a particu-
larly significant  production  pathway  is through  reaction   between  hydroxyl  free radical  and
nitrogen dioxide resulting  in  nitric acid (HON03)  formation.   The fate of nitric acid  in  the
atmosphere  is  not well  understood,  though a portion of  gaseous nitric acid  is known to enter
into an  equilibrium with ammonia (NH3)  to  form particulate ammonium nitrate (NH4N03).   Info-
rmation   on  the  production  rates  and mechanistic details  of  organic  particulate   matter  is
                                               6-3

-------
very  limited.   The product  information  which  is available indicates that oxidation reactions,
involving  the  interaction  of ozone,  nitrogen  oxides and  hydroxyl  free radicals  with  higher
molecular  weight  organics  represents a major pathway to organic particulate matter production.
6.2.2  Field Measurements on  the  Rate  of  S02 Oxidation
     The  majority of  S02  oxidation studies  in the  atmosphere  have been only  carried  out  in
recent years  and  of  those,  most  have  involved  power  plant plumes.  One reason for  the  late
start  in  this  research area  has  been  the lack  of adequate measurement technology for particu-
late  sulfur,  but recent developments  Huntzicker et  al.  (1978), Cobourn  et  al.  (1978)  seem  to
have  alleviated this problem.   A summary of  S02 oxidation rates based  on  field measurements
in power  plant, smelter and  urban plume  studies carried out  from  1975 to the present is given
in Table  6-1.   The rates of  S02 oxidation in  industrial  plant  plumes consistently range  from
0  to  10%/h, with urban plumes  showing only a slightly greater  maximum rate of  13%/h.   The
pre-1975 studies', Gartrell  et  al.  (1963), Dennis et al. (1969), Weber (1970) and Stephens and
McCalden  (1971),   which observed conversion rates an order magnitude larger  than  more  recent
observations, must be  considered suspect due  to  possible artifact  formations  in  the sulfate
analysis technique and  limitations in  the  analytical methods in general.
     Newman (1980) recently reviewed the majority of the power plant  and smelter plume studies
presented  in Table 6-1  and  arrived at  the  following conclusions.
     1)  The diurnal  average  oxidation rate  of  sulfur dioxide to sulfate is probably less  than
         1% per hour.
     2)  Little  or no oxidation  of  sulfur dioxide occurs from early  evening  through to early
         morning.
     3)  Maximum  oxidation  rates of sulfur  dioxide  to sulfur  of  3%  per hour  can  occur under
         midday conditions.
     4)  The  contribution  of  homogeneous  and heteorogeneous  mechanisms  to  sulfur  dioxide
         oxidation in plumes  cannot  be elucidated from the present studies.
     It should  be noted that the  reported S02  oxidation  rates  are estimates based  on analyses
of measured physical  and  chemical  parameters  and  in many  instances  have  incorporated  within
them certain  simplifying  assumptions which  are  not  totally substantiated.   Typical uncertain-
ties  in  reported values are   50%,  but  may  be  greater  if  inappropriate  assumptions  have  been
used.  Even with  these uncertainties  in  mind,  the  overall consistency  in  the observed range
of S02 oxidation  rates  is gratifying.
6.3  PHYSICAL REMOVAL PROCESSES
     The removal  of  particulate matter  and  gases  from  the atmosphere  occurs predominantly via
two physical  processes.  These  are  dry  deposition,  the  removal  of chemical  species from the
atmosphere  at the air surface interface, and precipitation scavenging, the removal  of chemical
species from  the atmosphere  by  interaction  with various types of precipitation  such as rain,
snow, etc.  These processes prove to have  both  a positive and negative  impact  with respect  to
                                                6-4

-------
             TABLE 6-1.  FIELD MEASUREMENTS ON THE RATES OF S02 OXIDATION IN PLUMES*
Plume Type
Location
S02 Oxidation
Rate (%h-l)
                         Method
         Reference
Keystone
  (Pennsylvania)

Labadie
  (Missouri)

Four Corners
  (New Mexico)

Labadie and
Portage des Sioux
  (Missouri)
Muscle Shoals
  (Alabama)
Kyger Creek
  (Ohio)

Labadie
  (Missouri)

Four Corners
  (New Mexico)

Labadie
  (Missouri)

Cumberland
  (Tennessee)

Great Canadian
Oil  Sands
  (Alberta, Canada)

Keystone
  (Pennsylvania)

Centralia
  (Washington)
Four Corners
  (New Mexico)

Four Corners
  (New Mexico)
   0-10
0.41-4.9
0.27-0.84
   0-5
   0-3
   2-8
   0-4
   0-7
   0-3
   0-5
   0-6
0.15-0.5
            32S/34S ratio, change with
            oxidation

            Total change in particle
            volume

            Sub-micron sulfate and
                - change of ratio with time
Newman et al.  (1975)


Cantrell and Whitby (1978)


Ursenbach et al.  (1977)
            Particulate sulfur to total
            sulfur ratio
            Particulate sulfur to total
            sulfur ratio

            CCN production (CCN to S02
            ratios)

            Particulate sulfur to total
            sulfur ratio

            Particulate sulfur to total
            sulfur ratio

            Particulate sulfur to total
            Particulate sulfur to
            total sulfur ratio
            Total change in particle
            vo 1 ume
            CCN production (CNN to S02
            ratios)
Forrest and Newman (1977)
Gillani et al.  (1978)
Pueschel and Van Valin (1978)
Husar et al (1978)
Meagher et al.  (1978)
Lusis et al. (1978)
Dittenhoefer and dePena (1978)
Hobbs et al. (1979)
Mamane and Pueschel (1980)
                                               6-5

-------
                                    TABLE 6-1 (Continued).
Plume Type
SO? Oxidation
Method
Reference
Leland-Olds
  (North Dakota)
Sherburne County
  Minnesota
Big Brown
  (Texas)
0-5.7       Total change in particle
            volume
                      Hegg and  Hobbs  (1980)
Smelter

INCO Nickel            0-7
  (Copper Cliff
   Canada)

INCO Nickel          1.2-5.2
  (Copper Cliff,
   Canada)

Mt Isa Mines
(MTISA, Australia)     0.25*

Urban
            Particulate sulfur to total
            sulfur rates
            Particulate sulfur to total
            sulfur rates
            Particulate sulfur to
            lead ratio
                      Lusis  and  Wiebe  (1976)
                      Forrest  and  Newman  (1977)
                      Roberts  and  Williams  (1979)
Los Angeles
Cal ifornia
St
St
. Louis
Missouri
. Louis
Missouri
1.2-13 Particulate sulfur to
total sulfur ratio
7-12.5 Particulate sulfur to
total sulfur ratio
3.6-4.2 Particulate sulfur to
total sulfur ratio
Roberts and Friedlander (1975)
Alkezweeny and Powell (1977)
Chang (1979)

*Adapted in part from Hegg and Hobbs (1980)
fdiurnal average rate
                                               6-6

-------
environmental air pollution  issues.   On the one hand,  they  constitute  the major mechanisms  by
which the polluted atmosphere cleanses itself,  lowering ambient air concentrations of pollutant
species and  thereby  reducing  health related risks, but on the  other  hand the deposited pollu-
tant materials may introduce increased risks to our terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
     Since wet and dry removal  processes  significantly affect  the lifetime of SO? and particu-
late matter  in  the  atmosphere  and  thereby affect  the distance traveled  and  concentration  of
these species, understanding  these  processes  is essential if  proper  assessment  of their envi-
ronmental significance  is to  result.   The removal  of pollutant  species by dew  fall  has  not
been studied and remains  for  future  research to  determine if  this  process is  an important
removal mechanisms for atmospheric contaminants.
     In the  sections  to  follow, discussion on  dry  deposition  and precipitation  scavenging  are
presented with emphasis on experimental data bases and theoretical treatment.
6.3.1  Dry Deposition
     Extensive surveys in the  area  of  particle  and  gas dry deposition have been performed over
the years,  several  recent examples  are reviews by Sehmel (1980), McMahon  and  Denison  (1979),
Chamberlain  (1980)  and  Garland (1978).   The  dry deposition  of sulfur  dioxide  and particulate
matter, as with other atmospheric species  is  governed by  three major components:  meteorologi-
cal variables, properties of  the  depositing pollutant and surface variables.  These components
are influenced by specific parameters which interact  in complex ways that in many  instances  are
not completely understood.
     The most important meteorological processes affecting dry deposition are transport related
phenomena.   These transport  processes  are governed  by the  wind  and temperature  profiles,  by
eddy diffusion and by sedimentation across the boundary layer to the canopy.  They are strongly
influenced  by two meteorological  parameters,   the  friction  velocity,  u*  and the aerodynamic
surface roughness, z0.   Both of these parameters  are used to describe  the wind speed  profile
above  a  given surface under  given  conditions  of  atmospheric  stability.   Typically these  two
variables are determined  empirically by fitting wind  speed  data  as  a function  of height.  The
strong diurnal dependence of dry deposition is linked to the  formation of a stable layer of  air
at the earth's surface  at night  (nocturnal inversion)  which affectively inhibits the vertical
transport of pollutant species to the canopy surface.   The formation of the nocturnal inversion
and  its  affect  on other  atmospheric  processes  is discussed  in  the section on transport  and
diffusion.
     Important properties influencing  the  dry  deposition  of a  pollutant are its solubility in
water and for particulate matter, specifically, its  size  distribution  density,  morphology  and
composition.   Important  properties  of the surface include:    1)   the moisture  content of  the
surface  which  in conjunction  with  the  solubility of the  pollutant  species will  govern  the
overall sticking  efficiency  of the  deposited  material; and  2)  the  physiological  state of  the
                                               6-7

-------
vegetation  surface,  most  importantly  the  the opening and closing of  stomata  pores,  where  the
rate of pollutant uptake  is thought to be  strongly governed.
     Chamberlain  and Chadwick  (1953)  introduced  a convenient way to  express  the rate of  dry
deposition  of  both  gases  and particles  in the form of  a  velocity  term.   Dry deposition  veloc-
ity, defined  as  the downward flux F of  the  species,  divided  by  its  ambient  concentration x  at
some specified height (typically 1-2 meters  above the  surface),  is  the  standard  form in  which
all measured  deposition  rates are reported.   Dry deposition  velocities  are  typically reported
in units of cm s~l.                         p
                                      vd = —
                                            x
     Dry deposition  velocity  is positive  by  convention and therefore  requires  a  minus  sign  on
F, the downward flux which is defined as negative.
     Measurement  techniques  for  the  dry  deposition  of  pollutant  species have  been  recently
reviewed and  critiqued  by Hicks et al.  (1980).   In this work measurement methods  were  sorted
into three  major  categories:   1)  estimates of accumulation,  2)  flux monitoring, and 3)   flux
parameterization.
     Though none of the experimental techniques developed to date has proven  to be a panacea in
dry deposition measurements,  a  consensus of  opinion  on the overall accuracy of the methods  and
their suitability for specific  applications  has  generally been reached.   Based on Hicks et  al.
(1980) the  three categories  are described briefly with  general comments  on their limitation.
      Estimates  of  accumulation  maybe  considered  using  atmospheric  radioactivity or  mass
balance methods.  Radioactive techniques compare  ambient  concentration of selected radioactive
species with  concentrations  in  water bodies  vegetation,  etc.  to evaluate  the  rate of input  of
the material  into the ecosystem over  long term periods.  The technique is typically limited to
small particle uptake of  long  lived species  and  has  difficulty distinquishing between  dry  and
wet removal  and  resolving short term  variations.  Mass balance  studies  attempt to measure  the
various inflow  and  outflow processes  in  the ecosystem, with  the exception  of  the dry  deposi-
tion, which is  then determined  through  a  budget  calculation.    The  major  limitation of  the
method is that the  dry  deposition is  inferred by indirect measurements which in themselves  are
difficult to measure  accurately.
     Flux monitoring  considers  the direct  measurements  of total  deposition over a well  defined
surface for set periods of time.   Several  types of deposition surfaces have been used with this
general category including:   open pots,  flat  filters,  flat plates  and shallow  pans,  fiber
filters and  sticky  films.  Overall, the methods  are  limited  due  to  their lack of standardiza-
tion,  unrepresentativeness of  natural  surfaces  and  potential  for  contamination by  locally
resuspended particles.
     Flux parameterization includes a variety  of methods, one of which,  eddy correlation  has
shown significant promise  as   a  measurement standard  for  the dry  deposition  of gases.   The
                                               6-8

-------
technique requires the  simultaneous  measurement  of the concentration of  pollutant  species  and
the vertical component of the wind velocity at a  sufficiently fast enough  rate to determine  the
turbulent flux  of  the pollutant concentration.   A significant limitation of  the technique  is
the lack of adequate  fast-response instrumentation  for  many  of the pollutant species of inter-
est.  In addition, particle  flux due to  gravitational  settling is not detected and  can produce
invalid results  if significant  particle  resuspension is occurring.   Also considered under  the
flux parameterization category  are  laboratory methods   including chamber  and  wind tunnel  stud-
ies.  In these  controlled experimental studies,  plants, leaves,  or  simulated canopy surfaces,
etc. are exposed to  known amounts of  pollutant  concentration.   Measurements  in the change  in
concentration, which  can  be accomplished  by  a variety of methods,  is then  used to determine
pollutant uptake.
6.3.1.1   Sulfur Dioxide Dry Deposition—The dry deposition  of SO?  to  grass,  crops,  forests,
soil and  building  surfaces  has  been  reviewed  in  recent years  by Sehmel (1980),  McMahon  and
Denison (1979)  Chamberlain  (1980)  and Garland (1978).   Compilations  of dry  deposition labora-
tory and  field  measurements of SOj have  been  presented  in  McMahon and Denison   (1979).    A
review of these  results  indicates  measured dry deposition velocities ranging  from  0.04 to  3.7
cm-sec"l, but  with the majority  residing  in  the  range 0.3 to  1.6  cm-sec'l.   The apparently
wide range  of  dry  deposition values  is  not  particularly disconcerting  when the  variety  of
surfaces, meteorological  conditions,  and  experimental  methods  is  taken into  consideration.
     A summary  of  the average dry deposition velocity by surface type   is  presented  in  Table
6-2.
                TABLE 6-2.  AVERAGE DRY DEPOSITION  VELOCITY OF  S02 BY SURFACE TYPE
                                 Laboratory Measurement,                 Field Measurement,
          Surface                     vg(cm sec'l)                         vg(cm sec'1)
Alfalfa
Grass
Wheat
Forest
Sandy Soil
Clayey Soil
Soil
Land
Water (Fresh)
Ocean
Snow
1.2 (2)
-
-
-
0.6 (2)
0.8 (2)
-
-
-
-
—
1.6 ( 2)
1.1 (14)
0.4 ( 3)
1-4 ( 5)

-
1.2 ( 4)
1-2 ( 4)
1.1 ( 6)
0.5 ( 2)
0.3 ( 2)

Note:  Values  in parenthesis indicate the number of separate studies used to  obtain the
       average deposition velocity.
                                              6-9

-------
     In  reviewing predominantly the  same  set of data  Garland  (1978) concluded that  the mean
deposition  velocities  for S02  over  surfaces ranging from  water  and soil through  short  grass
to forest  were very similar and suggested  a value  of about 0.8  cm  s~l  to be quite applicable
to large areas of Europe.
     Sheih  et  al. (1979)  in  a more  detailed  effort  to estimate dry deposition  velocities  of
sulfur  dioxide and particulate  sulfate  over the eastern  half  of the United  States,  southern
Ontario  and nearby oceanic regions,  computed deposition velocities   as a  function  of  land use
characteristics,  surface  roughness scale lengths and surface resistances  to pollutant uptake.
Gridded  dry deposition  velocities maps of  sulfur  dioxide  and  sulfate  corresponding  to half
degree  increments  of  longitude and latitude  were computed  for  a  range of atmospheric  stabili-
ties.   The  results indicate  that deposition  velocity distributions for sulfur  dioxide are
rather  nonuniform for  the less stable  atmospheric conditions.   For very  unstable,  Pasquill
category A,  atmospheric  conditions dry deposition  velocities over the eastern U.S. ranged from
0.4  to  0.9  cm s~l  (excluding water  surfaces)  for  sulfur  dioxide,  with  a mean area  wide dry
deposition  velocity of approximately  0.6 'cm s~l.    Under  the same  conditions  sulfates ranged
from 0.7  to 0.9  cm  s-1 with  a  mean  value of  approximately 0.8  cm   s~l.  Sheih et al. (1979)
note that  under  near  calm conditions  at night,  stability  classification  schemes  do not adequ-
ately represent  the nocturnal  inversion  formed at  the surface and recommend that  a dry deposi-
tion velocity  of 0.07 cm s'1 be assumed for both sulfur dioxide and sulfate particles.
6.3.1.2  Particle Dry Deposition—The dry deposition of particulate matter is considerably less
understood  from  the  viewpoint  of measurements for  pollutant species  of  interest.    In the
reviews  by Sehmel  (1980)  and McMahon and  Denison  (1979),  deposition velocities  for  particle
species are  compiled for  both  artificial  and natural  surfaces.   Unfortunately, with the excep-
tion of  lead particles  from  automotive exhaust,  virtually no data existed for the other impor-
tant particulate pollutants,  such  as sulfates,  nitrates,  and carbon containing particles.  An
additional problem arises  in the interpretation of the relationship between deposition  measure-
ments on  fallout  collectors  to that of dry deposition rates on  natural surfaces.   Fallout
collectors which  were  used in  a significant  portion of the measurements reported,  typically do
not have the characteristics of the surfaces they are attempting to simulate.
     Tables  6-3  and 6-4  from  McMahon and Denison  (1979)  present a  compilation of literature
values  for  the deposition velocities  of particles measured under laboratory  and  field condi-
tions.   The data cover  a range  of  surface  variables,  particle sizes  and  composition,  and
meteorological  conditions.  A review of the data indicate:
     — Deposition in nature varies considerably via processes which   are not totally understood.
     -- The minimum deposition velocity for a particle is in a size range of 0.1 to 1.0 urn dia-
        meter.
     -- Deposition velocities  are  often  reported for  particle  diameters  and size  distributions
        that do not reflect typical atmospheric particulate matter characteristics.
                                              6-10

-------
TABLE 6-3.   LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF DEPOSITION VELOCITIES OF PARTICLES
Author
(date)
Chamberlain (1967)


M oiler and Schumann
(I97UI
Chjmberljin and
Chjjuick (1972)
CUighl 197.1)

Schmcl (197.1)
Schmcl and Suiter 119741
Bclot and Gauihier
11975)
Klcppcr and Craig (1975)
Craig a nl. (1976)
Wedding ,-i al. 11976)




Little and Widen (1977)
Litile (1977)








Reference
i, height
(cms"') (ml
0.0.1
0.03
01
O.S
,.r D:>

i . •= 0.06H.
r,-o.i2u.
0.005 "I
r 0-
2 J
2xlO'J-IO 0.01
5x|0~'-29 0.01
r. r. «'
r. ;. f
0.00.15
0.01





0.11
0.02
0.5
0.04
0.3
0.9
O.I
0.3
1.5
0.3
0.8
Paniculate
diameter
(; Short grass
Nettle
Beech
White Poplar
Nettle
Beech
White Poplar
Nettle
Beech
While Poplar
Comment



D «= ilillusion coefficient
2« I0': > D? 2« I0'5tm:»''
Drvllni-liirtes wind-tunnel
We'lJanJ held data
r, lo copper also mejMJrrd.
i, found to be a funi'iion of
wind speed.

Sec Fig. 1
Sec Fip 1
u — wind speed
d — panicle diameter

Wind-tunnel
Dcno>itiun rate on pubesceni
lca\e\ of sunflower was nearly
7 limes that of the non-
purvsicni leaves of tulip
poplar.

These data are for whole
shoots for wind speeds of
2.5ms"1. Data for other wind
speeds and separate plant
surfaces are gi\en in reference.




                                 6-11

-------
TABLE 6-4.   FIUD MEASUREMENTS OF DEPOSITION VELOCITIES OF WKTICLES
Authur
(date)
Chamberlain (1953)
EnUson (1959)

Small (I960)

Neubergcr >i ul. (1967)
While and Turner (1970)




Esmen and Com (1971)
Reference Paniculate
i, heifht diameter
icms*1) (ml (iim) Surface
11 0.3-09
II 0.3-0.9
0.5 0.3 09
0.7
1.6
05
(0.2 3.4)
,6 1
16 > Grass
,6 J
Ocean
Land
Land

Rag-weed Coniferous
e forest
S.f,
4.7
3.0
7.1
0.8

Na •} ^
K 1 Miied 1
Ca f deciduous f
Mg woodland
P J J
r Filler paper.
Comment
u - 9.2 m/s
u - 3.2 m/s
u - I.I m/s
Chloride over Scandinavia

Radioactive particles over
Non»ay
80°. rag-weed pollen removed
from air by forest
>l Probable overesiimaiion of
aerosol income, hence rr
2. Standard deviation varied
between 65 and 95". of
mean i§.

i.-O.SD 0.1-10 •{ Milliporc filler

Chamberlain and
ChadwicL (1972)
Pierson el ul 11973)


Caw« (1974)











Han jnd Parent (1974)

Clough (1975)






Abrahjimcn rf ul.
(19761

DovljnJ and Elijv-en
(19761
Frii.thcn and EJmonds

Prjhm ft ul. (1976)

Kie> anj ToonLel (1977)
Wesley ,-i ul. ( 1977)


r. - 0.06,,. jo.,

0.1-0.6

1.3
0.22
(045)
0.50
(0.50)
I.I
0.56
(0.45)
0.30
(1.0)
0.29
0.62


3.4
7.3
II
61
100 :
0.74
I.I
0.75 1
117
soi


*• Class slide
J > Cereal crops

Land

Al -N
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Fe
Mr,
Ni
Pb
Ti
\
Zn J
'*' V?' Douglas fir
°' ' and junipers
P. NO, ' ^
Crass
Grass
• 30 Grass
Dry moss
Wet moss
• 4 Grass
1 Grass
Dry moss
Spruce and
pines

0.16 \ atmospheric "\ _
068 /aerosol / Snow
007
0.46
3 Douglas lir

atmospheric Atlantic
»cro
0.5
to! ocean

06 5 005 0 1 Bare soil

and grass

Dmlncludes mind-tunnel and
Wet/field data.
t, estimated for 23 trace
elements based on several
years of data
Entracted from Gatz (1975).
Values in parentheses were
estimated by Cau from a
relationship between particle
silt and rr

*





Deposition
beneath trees ^
open terrain
Dry u. - 37 cm s " '
Dry u, " 87 cms" '
Wet ii. - 87 cms'1


Dry w. • 37 cms"1
Dry u. — 37 cm s " '
Deposition
bencjth trees ^
open terrain
Lead
SO;" : upper bound value


soj-

90».: HASL wet -dry collector
• < 2m.'1; Edd) correl
method.
                           6-12

-------
     The  large  experimental  uncertainties  associated  with  particle  dry  deposition  velocity
measurement has stimulated the development and application of theoretical models for simulating
the dry deposition process and predicting dry deposition velocities given specific meteorologi-
cal data,  Sehmel  (1980),  SI inn  (1978, 1977), and Davidson  and  Friedlander  (1978).   The models
describe  only  the  physical  processes  of  bringing  the  particle to  the  depositing  surface.
No consideration  has  been  given  to particle  shapes other  than  spherical,  to particle composi-
tion, or to surface properties with regard  to particle  retention.  Particle size, an important
property  in the  aerodynamic  flow of  particles  to  surfaces, is considered.   The  typical  model
result, shows predicted deposition velocities to  increase  as surface roughness and/or friction
velocity  increases  and to  be nearly independent of  atmospheric stability.   The  deposition
velocity for particles  passes through a  minimum in the  0.1 to 1 pm  diameter particle range.
     Figure 6-2  (Sehmel 1980) presents  predicted deposition  velocities at  1 meter from  the
surface, for u*  = 30 cm  s'l and particle  densities  of 1,4,  and 11.5g cm3,  (g/cm^  =  yg/m^).
     In Table  6-5 the  range of  predicted  deposition  velocities at a height of 10  meters  is
presented  for  two  particle  size  regions  and  for a  range  of  aerodynamic  surface  roughness
lengths, mean wind speeds, and calculated friction velocities.  These results are based on data
presented  in Sehmel (1980) and should be  fairly representative of the majority of meteorologi-
cal and surface conditions encountered in the environment.
6.3.2  Precipitation Scavenging
     As with dry  deposition,  precipitation  scavenging or wet  removal  results from  a series  of
complex physical  and chemical interactions involving properties of the scavenging media and the
species removed.    Research  in the area has continued for over  the past thirty years, focusing
on the removal  of radioactive debris  from the atmosphere  introduced  by nuclear weapons testing
Bowen, (1960),  Engelmann,  (1968)  and  Volchok, et al. (1971),  and in conjunction  with material
balance or budget studies on  the removal  of various  elemental  species from  the  atmosphere,
Robinson and Robbins (1970),  Rasmussen et al.  (1975)  and Junge (1972, 1974).
     The  fundamentals  of  the theory of  precipitation  scavenging  have  been researched  and
reviewed over the years, by Engelmann  (1968),  Postma (1970), Hales (1972), Slinn,  et al. (1978)
and Slinn  (1981).   Though  our understanding of the details  of  the complex  processes operative
in  precipitation  scavenging  is  less  than  complete,  significant progress  has  been made  in
elucidating the  general scavenging pathways  and developing  appropriate  parameterizations  for
their quantitative treatment.  As pointed out  by Slinn  (1981) and others, the removal of trace
constituents from  the atmosphere by  precipitation  scavenging is dependent  on  four  basic fac-
tors:   1)   the position  of  the  trace constituent  relative to  the  scavenging media;  2)   the
physical form of  the  scavenging  media; 3)  the  chemical  and physical  properties of  the trace
constitutent;  and  4)   the specific physical/chemical process that  is  operative.   These basic
factors are schematically illustrated  in  Figure 6-3.
                                             6-13

-------
•^                 .,1
         MIIICU DIAMHtl. urn
Figure 6-2.  Predicted deposition velocities at 1  m for
densities of 1, 4. and 11.5 g cm 3.
                                30 cm s'1 and particle
        6-14

-------
i
*—i
in
                       DEPENDENCEJJF J'RE^PjTATIp^SCAVENGIKG (WASHOUT) ON:

                     (1) POSITION    ! (2) PRECIPITATION  | (3) POLLUTANTS    |  (4) PROCESSES
                                   I
         NUCLEATION
         SCAVENGING
                         IN-CLOUD
                         SCA VENG I NG
                      aow -CLOUD
                     SCAVENGING  Vl
                                           SCAVENGING
                                           (SNOWOUT)
I  SCAVENGING
I  (RAINOUT)
I
I
                      "•"> PARTICLE
                           SNOWOUT
                                                      GAS
                                                      RAINOUT
eg.
                                                                                 INtRTIAL
                                                                                 DIFFUSICNAL,
                                                                                 etc.,
                                                                                 PARTICLE
                                                                                 SNOWOUT '"'
                      :n*
EQUILIBRIUM
REVERSIBLE,
etc.
GAS RAINOUT
                                   Figure 6-3. Basic factors influencing precipitation scavenging.

-------
                       TABLE 6-5.  PREDICTED PARTICLE DEPOSITION VELOCITIES1"

Deposition Velocity Rangett
ZQ
cm
0.1
10
0.1
10
u/u*
m-sec/cm-sec
2.3/10
1.2/10
11.5/50
5.8/50
Particle
0.1 to lu
cm s"l
1.5X10-2 - 5.0X10-2
9.0X10-2 - 1.5X10-1
2.0X10-2 - 5.5X10-2
1.0X10"1 - 2.0X10'1
Diameter
lu to lu
cm s"l
5.0X10-2 - 4
1.5X10-1 - 4
5.5X10-2 - 4
2.0X10'1 - 4

 fBased on model predictions in Sehmel (1980)
"^particle density of 11.5 mg/m^

     A convenient  practice  in  the field of  precipitation  scavenging has been  to  distinguish
between  below-cloud  and   in-cloud  scavenging  processes.    Unfortunately,   the  commonly  used
terminology  used  in  describing these processes,  rainout  for  in-cloud  and  washout for  below
cloud, has   lead  to  considerable  confusion.   The  elucidation  of  the  contribution of  these
processes to the  total scavenging  in  a  precipitation event  is extremely difficult.   Washout,
being more amenable  to  experimental  study,  has  received  the most attention  from the scientific
community.   Also  in  many experimental  studies,  distinction of  the two  processes has  been
ignored  and  only  the total  precipitation  scavenging has  been considered.   The  theoretical
approaches to  be  discussed in  the  section  to  follow are  for  washout  processes  only,  while
empirical parameterization discussed consider total gas and particle scavenging.
     The parameterization  of the  precipitation  scavenging  process  has generally  taken  the form
of a loss rate per unit volume  and has evolved from various assumptions applied to the  continu-
ity equation, SI inn  (1977).  Parameterizations for the removal of gases by rain and the removal
of particles by rain and by snow  are  considered  in  the  following  sections.   The formalism and
technical rigor used in their  development, can be  found  elsewhere, Hales   (1972,  1978)  SI inn
(1977), and  is beyond the scope of this work.
6.3.2.1  SO? Wet Removal--The removal of sulfur dioxide from the atmosphere  by rain is  governed
by basic  physical  processes that  describe  the  absorption  and desorption of  the S02 molecules
from the hydrometeor, Hales  (1972,  1978),  and by a series of chemical reactions,  Postma (1970),
Hill  and Adamowicz  (1977),  Barrie  (1978), which  account  for the  liquid  phase  oxidation  of
S02-   From  a purely  physical process  viewpoint,  the rate  of scavenging of  a gas  by rain is a
function  of  the size spectrum  of the raindroplets, the fall  path  of the  raindroplet to the
ground,  the  rainfall  rate,  and  the solubility  of  the gas.   General  expressions have  been
                                              6-16

-------
developed,  Hales  (1978)  and  Slinn  et  al.  (1978),  for  computing  the  scavenging  of S0£  and
other gases  given  simplifing assumptions  regarding  the characterization of  the precipitation
and solubility of the  gas.   As  pointed out  in Chapter  2, the  liquid  phase  oxidation  of  SO? is
very  complex and  not   adequately  understood  at  present.   Several  recent  studies,   Hill  and
Adamowicz (1977), Barrie (1978), Garland (1978), Gravenhorst, et al  . (1978)  have considered the
S02 -  bisulfite  oxidation process,  Scott  and  Hobbs  (1967)  in predicting wet  removal  rates of
S02  under various  atmospheric  conditions.   The  solution  phase chemistry  for SO?,   based on
the mechanism of  Scott and Hobbs  (1967) as  used  in  the S02 washout  model  by Barrie  (1978) is
discussed here as an illustrative example.
     Sulfur  dioxide  exists  in  solution as  physically dissolved  SC>2 (S02-H20), which  follows a
linear  Henry's  Law   relationship with  gas  phase  S02,  bisulphite (HSC>3'), and sulfite (503").
The equilibria describing the process are as follows:
                              (S02)g + (H20)i * (S02-H20)£

                                   [S02-H20]t
                              KH = -                                        (i)
                                     [S02]g
                                       * H\ + HS03-J,
                                   [H+]1[HS03-])l
                                                                                    (2)
                              HS03-t *H\

                                   [H+]1[S03=]£
                              K2 = -                                     (3)
     The K's  are  equilibrium constants, with  KH being the  Henry's  Law constant  for  S02,  and
the square brackets represent chemical  activities which  are  effectively concentrations for the
dilute conditions present.   It  has been established Beilke  and  Lamb  (1975)  that the dissocia-
tion of S02-H20 and HS03" are very rapid, thereby introducing a non-linear relationship between
gas phase  S02 and total  dissolved SC>2 which  is strongly dependent  on  pH (see  Figure 6-4
Barrie,  1978)  and only  weakly dependent on temperature.  The  effect  of  temperature is a shift
in equilibria  to  the  left for  increasing  temperatures,  resulting in a  slight  shifting  to  the
right of the  curves in  Figure 6-4.   Within the pH range of  precipitation, pH  3 to 6,  over  90%
of  the  dissolved  S02  exists  as  bisulfite,  with  less  than  10% existing as  sulfite.    This
result indicates that equilibrium  equation  (7)  can  be  neglected, without significantly effect-
ing the  washout calculation.    Barrie  assumed that S02  oxidation in  the raindrops  could  be
neglected due  to the  limited time for reaction  (0-5 min) and  the low pH's encountered,  Beilke
et al.
                                             6-17

-------
O  1 o
   '•"
o
_l
u.

O
   0.5
£   o
       SO, • HjO
                                                             10
                             PH
   Figure 6-4.  Abundance of dissolved SO2 species as a function

   of pH (25°C).
                          6-18

-------
(1975).   In cases where  S02  is the dominant  species  contributing to the  acidity  of  the rain
droplet,  an  expression  relating the gas  phase SOj concentration to the  bisulfite  ion concen-
tration in equilibrium with the gas is as follows:

                              [HS03-]peq =

     Incorporating this  expression with  a  physical  model  for  gas transfer  to the  droplet,
Barrie  (1978)  modeled the  washout  of SC>2  from a  plume  under varying meteorological  and  SC>2
concentration conditions.   He  concluded  that the  fractional  plume  washout  rate (%/mm  rain)  is
inversely proportional  to the  plume  concentration and  thickness.   For  heavy  rain  (25  mm/h)
washout from  a  1000 ppb(v) S02 plume  of 20 m thickness occurs  at a  rate of  56%  hr'l,  while
under drizzle conditions  (0.5  mm/h)  for  a 300 pph(v)  S02 plume of  50  m thickness  the  rate  was
2% h~l.   Barrie assumed  that  the  pH of  the raindrop was  governed by the dissolution  of  the
S02-    In  a  more  definitive model  of  S02  washout,  Hill and  Adamowicz  (1977)  included  esti-
mates for S02 oxidation within rain droplets  and  for  the pH  dependence  of the precipitation.
They  indicated  that  pH  can  be quite variable (over  six orders  of magnitude)  at  S02 ambient
levels of 10 ppb and less.  As S02  levels increase, the variability in  background pH decreases.
The S02 oxidation rate of 3.6% h~l  used  in the calculations is based on the catalytic oxidation
studies of  Brimblecombe and  Spedding  (1974).    In a  typical  calculation  of  the  rate of  S02
washout,  Hill  and  Adamowicz  assumed  various  ambient  S02  concentrations to  be  well  mixed
through a layer 1 kilometer  in depth  and  a rainfall  rate of 1  mm/h  with a  predominant drop
radius of 0.5 mm and pH  of 7.  Calculated washout rates  of S02  under these  conditions were
2.6%/h and .8%/h for ambient S02 levels  of 10 ppb and  100 ppb, respectively.
     A  convenient  empirical expression  for the  wet   removal  of gases  takes  the  form  of  an
exponential  decay process,  where the time  constant for decay (scavenging  coefficient for  the
gas), determined in  field and laboratory studies, is a function of the  rainfall intensity.  The
expression takes the form
                              xt = xPt                                          (5)

where xt and x0 are the atmospheric concentrations of the gas at time  t  and zero, respective-
ly, and  A  is the  scavenging coefficient for  the  gas.   Estimates of  the  scavenging coeffic-
ients for  sulfur  dioxide have been  determined  by Chamberlain  (1953),  Beilke  (1970),  Hales  et
al .  (1971),  Dana  et  al.  (1975) and others.   calculated scavenging  rates  of 502  usi"9 these
coefficients can  range typically from 2% h"1  to 22% h~l.
6.3.2.2  Particle Wet Removal—The study of precipitation scavenging  of particles has predomi-
nantly focused on theoretical  studies, Semonin and Beadle, (1977),  Slinn  (1977),  Grover et al.
(1977), Wang et al.  (1978), but with considerable emphasis  in experimentel  work  taking hold  in
                                              6-19

-------
recent  years  (Dana and  Hales,  1976 ; Radke  et  al.,  1980 ; Gatz,  1977).   The wet  removal  of
sulfate  participate  matter in  the  ambient environment has been  of  particular  interest, (Scott,
 1978 ;  Hales,   1978  ;  Dana,  1980)  due  to  the  acidic  tendency of  these  particles and  the
increased  concern  in the phenomenon termed  "acid  rain".   Chapter 7 of  this  criteria document
discusses  acid  precipitation  and its associated scientific  issues  and is  not  a specific  topic
for consideration  in this section.
     Important  parameters affecting  the  particle  scavenging  rate  by precipitation, as  with
gases,  are the  size spectrum  of the rain droplets,  the  fall  path of the rain droplet to  the
ground, and the rainfall rate,  but also  include in addition, the size distribution and composi-
tion off the particulate matter.  As with  gases, general expressions have been developed  (Slinn,
 1977)  for computing the scavenging of particles given certain simplif ing. assumptions.
     A  practical operational  approach in  predicting  the  wet removal  of  particles as mentioned
previously for  gaseous  has been through the  measurement  of empirical  scavenging coefficients.
     A  comprehensive  list  of  field  measurements  of wet scavenging coefficients of particle has
been compiled by McMahon and Denison (1979)  and presented  in  Table  6-6.   A  cautionary note is
in order.  The  scavenging coefficients  are dependent  on the rain fall rate,  the mean rain drop
radius, and the particle  size.  When these factors are taken into consideration, the scavenging
coefficients reported  in Table  6-6  show reasonable  consistency  as  demonstrated  by Figure 6-5
taken from McMahon and Denison  (1979).
     Recent airborne measurements by Radke et al. (1980) on precipitation scavenging of aerosol
particles  greater  than  0.01  pm diameter  in  aged air masses,  coal  fired  power  plant plumes, a
Kraft paper mill,  and a  plume from a  volcanic  eruption  were quite  encouraging  in supporting
theoretical estimates of wet removal for aerosol particles greater than 1.0 urn.  Marked differ-
ences  were observed  in  the  submicron  particle region,  where  measured  scavenging efficien-
cies for submicron aerosol particles were  typically an order of magnitude greater than theore-
tical predictions;  and the  scavenging  gap,  that  portion of  the aerosol particle  size  range
where scavenging collection  efficiencies  are at a minimum, was  observed to be  much narrower
than predicted  by theory.  Radke et  al. (1980) offer  some  explanations  for  the discrepancies
including  deliquescent  growth  and nucleation scavenging  of  the  submicron  particles in convec-
tive clouds.    Considering  the varied aerosol  particle sources   and. precipitation  studied the
measurements showed marked continuity, (see Figure 6-6), Radke et al.  (1980).
6.4  TRANSPORT AND DIFFUSION
     Pollutant  substances  emitted into  the atmosphere are transported and diffused as a  result
of  a  series of  complex physical interactions  which  describe the  mean  motion of  air and its
fluctuating components.  Transport and diffusion have associated with them spatial and temporal
scales.  The  selection of the  spatial or  temporal  domain of interest  directly influences what
specific physical  phenomena  will  predominantly  affect the transport and  diffusion process.
                                               6-20

-------
           TABLE 6-6.  FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SCAVENGING COEFFICIENTS OF PARTICLtS
Author
Idaiel
Kalkstcin ri al. (1959)
Georgii (1963)

Banerji and Chatterjet (1964)
Makhon'ko (1964)
Shirvaikar n al. (1960)
Makhon'ko and Dmitrieva
(1966)
Makhon'ko (1967)
Wolf and Dane (1969)

Bakulin el al. (1970)

Burtscv ti al. (1970)

Dana (1970)

Perkins el al. (1970)
Peterson and Crawford (1970)

Esmen (1972)
Rodhe and Grandell (1972)

Acres- ESC (1974)
Gracdel and Franey (1975)
Hicks (1976)
Gruedel and Franey (1977)





A-',
1 x ID"'
2 x |Q-»
4 x 10"' -\
22 x 10'» >
4 x 10-' J
0.4 x 10"'
2 x 10-' \
«1 x 10"' /
7 x 10-'
20 x 10-'

7 x 10-'
0.5 x 10" 'J

3 x 10-'

is x io-'y°»
20 x 10-»J°»
13 x 10'»J

300 x 10"'
16 x ID'' J"

0.4 x 10-'


0.7 x 10-'
A^-25-SOA,.,.
50 x I0'»
19 IO'5
18 ID''
28 10'»
43 10-'
65 ID''
92 10-'
Particubic
size
(/iml
SO.. NH.
Cl, NO,
Dissolved
inorganic
contamineni
Radon
Fission products
Atmospheric dust
Fission products

Atmospheric dust
0.5



=0.2
=0.2
7.5.3

Atmospheric aerosol
5

Atmospheric aerosol


Atmospheric aerosol
0.4-1
<1

0.3-05
0.5-07
0.7-0.9
0.9-1.5
1.5-3
Commeni
Rainou,"lMalhon.k ,%7
Washout/
> Rainout
Washout
Rainout Makhon'ko (1967)
Rainoul
Washout
Rainout Makhon'ko (1967).
Rainoul

Rainoul plus washout
Snow: Knution and
Slockham (1977)
11 'Pb; washout from
thunderstorm
Washout
Rainout
Uranin and rhodamine
particles respectively
Rainout
Based on Engclmann's
data (1965)
Includes rainoul
Suggest A proportional
to rainfall intensity
Includes rainout
Set Slinn (1976)
Rainout
Condensation nuclei


Snow


Radkerf al. (1977)
Set Fig. 8
                                       6-21

-------
 2 ,oo
 <   1
 E
                                       Radke * rf (1977)
                                       Bunu» «l * (18701
                                       Hkki (1»76>
                                       Dan> (1B70)
                                       Pateraon A
                                       CrMfonl (IKS)
     0.01           0.1            1            10
           EQUIVALENT PARTICLE DIAMETER (pm)

Figure 6-5.  Relationship between rain scavenging
rates and particle size.
                            6-22

-------
100
               DATE    SOURCE OF AEROSOL
 MAY 13.1974  PT TOWNSCND PAPER MILL.WA
 MAR 25.1976 "NATURAL.NEAR CENTRAUA.WA
 MAY io. are  CENTRALIA TOWER PLANT. WA
            (•) 400 » AND (B) 265i
	SCAVENGING TIME	
   10
            DRY AEROSOL RARTICLE DIAMETER

                         (a)




IOU
^
05
£&>
0> 50
UJ ffi
§0
ss
P



»
PATE SOURCE OF AEROSOL
	 JUL. 1.1976 NATURAL* (o) 3 km MSL
AND (b) 2.5km MSL AT
	 JUN 29.1977 FOUR CORNERS POWER
•.
•.
(o)X \\ ///-
- .--"'^ ''' \\ I jf
"' \ M
\ '• i
\ §
\ .
\ §
\ -

V
. .... ...1 . . 	 .1 , ,
o-f 10-' K>°
PARTICLES

MILES CITY.MT.
PLANT. NM.
X* /''
f" ,>'






	 i
10'
            DRY AEROSOL PARTICLE DIAMETER Urn)
                          (b)


Figure 6-6.  Percentages of aerosol particles of various
sizes removed by precipitation scavenging.
                         6-23

-------
     The  study  of air pollution  transport  and  diffusion is typically treated on the  basis  of
the extent of the horizontal scale.  Therefore, high level pollutant concentrations  which occur
in the vicinity  of  a major emission source are dominated by physical processes that are opera-
tive on  a local  horizontal scale of the order of  1  to  5 kilometers,  or  approximately  one hour
of transport.   Since the  majority  of  criteria pollutants are emitted directly  into the atmo-
sphere by major  sources,  a  predominance  of interest with respect  to  air  pollution regulation
has resided  on  this scale.  But, as air pollution  issues  are  raised  with  regard to pollutants
of  a  more  ubiquitous  nature,  having  appreciable  long  life-time  and  in  some cases  forming
through  secondary  reaction processes,   the  horizontal  scale of  interest expands considerably.
Sulfur dioxide and  particulate  matter  span  a horizontal scale ranging from local to global.   A
brief review of  the  physical  processes contributing to transport and diffusion is presented  in
section  6.4.1, while  section  6.4.2  considers pollutant  residence times and their long  distance
transport.
6.4.1  The Planetary Boundary Layer
     The  primary vehicle for the  transport of pollutants within the atmosphere is the mean wind
within approximately the first  1000 meters  above the earth's surface.  The mean wind is deter-
mined  primarily  by  the  interaction of three  forces governed by thermodynamic  and mechanical
processes.   These  are:   the force  due to  the  horizontal pressure gradient  produced by differ-
ential solar  heating of the earth's surface;  the Coriolis force due  to the  earth's rotation;
and the  friction force due to the texture of the earth's surface.  The planetary boundary layer
is defined  as  that  portion  of  the  atmosphere  within  which surface frictional  effects  have a
substantial  impact  on the  mean  wind.   Typically, this layer is hundreds of meters in depth and
varies diurnally.
     Diffusion  in  the  planetary  boundary  layer,  which governs the  spreading of pollutants
perpendicular to the transport  flow, is regulated by turbulence.  Turbulence,  which  is  compris-
ed of  a  complex  spectrum of fluctuating  motion  superimposed  on the mean wind,  is .generated
through  the interaction of directional  and speed differences (Shear) in large scale atmospheric
motions  and perturbations  introduced  in the mean flow by the roughness of the earth's  surface,
as well  as by heating of this surface  by the sun.
     The  theory  of  the  mean  vertical  structure of the planetary boundary is fairly well under-
stood,  Haugen  (1973)  and  its  characterization  is possible  through  the measurement  of basic
meteorological parameters.  The description of the turbulent properties within the mean motion,
which  govern  diffusion, has  proven to  be  more elusive.   Detailed  theoretical  approaches  to
turbulence  encounter solution  problems  resulting from  having more  unknown parameters  than
equations.   The  introduction of  higher order  closure  techniques,  which  apply assumptions that
permit new  unknowns to be expressed in terms  of others in such  a  way as  to  allow  solution  of
the equation set,  have limited practical application  due  to  their  intensive  computer  and data
requirements.  As  a  consequence the practical  treatment of atmospheric diffusion to air pollu-
                                               6-24

-------
tion  related  processes  is  based on  highly parameterized  theories which  depend  strongly on
basic experimental data sets.
     Practical  approaches  to  the  treatment of  atmospheric diffusion  have been derived  from
three  principal  sources:   statistical  theory,   similarity  theory and  gradient transport or
K-theory (Pasquill,  1974).   A brief description  of  these approaches  and their  utility to  air
pollution related problems is  presented below.   More definitive discussions on the  theories can
be found in the annotated references.
     Statistical theory considers the time  history of  the motion of a single fluid "particle",
relative to a  fixed  co-ordinate axis  (Taylor,  1921),  and of groups or  clusters  of  such  parti-
cles  relative  to  their  centroid (Batchelor,  1953).    The  theory provides  the  basis for  the
development of the Gaussian diffusion formulation and  provides an effective means  to correlate
empirical  dispersion data.   As  a result,  diffusion  equations for  various emission  source
types have been developed (Gifford, 1968, 1975  ;  Turner, 1970 ; Pasquill,  1974, 1975). A practi-
cal  limitation of this  approach  is  that  it  makes the  fundamental  assumption of  turbulence
homogeneity, whereas boundary-layer turbulence  is  inhomogeneous, especially  in the vertical.
     The  similarity  theory of  diffusion relates  the  mean  position  and  other properties  of
diffusing  clouds  and plumes to the characteristic  parameters  of the surface  layer,  by dimen-
sional reasoning.   Results (Monin  and  Yaglom,  1971)   are reasonably complete for  the surface
layer.   But extension  to the entire boundary  layer  introduces further  parameters,  which limit
their practical use.
     The gradient-transport, or K-theory of diffusion  is historically the oldest; it originated
with Pick  (1855) and Boussinesq (1877).   Atmospheric applications have been most successful at
large scales,  including  global  diffusion. At boundary-layer scales the  behavior of  K is quite
complicated.    Useful  results  can  be  obtained  (Pasquill,  1974 ;  Yaglom,  1975  -,  or Csanady,
 1973), but the mathematics required tends to be fairly elaborate.  The essential problem is to
account for the strong space-time scale-dependence of  eddy-diffusivity,  which was  first demon-
strated by Richardson  (1926).   Berlyand  (1974) has based  a  comprehensive  system of air pollu-
tion analysis entirely on a form of K-theory.
     The parameterization of atmospheric diffusion was shown by Obukhov (1941) to follow a form
of Richardson's law of diffusion where the total  amount of turbulent energy dissipation and the
pollutant  spreading  is  proportional  to  the  diffusion time  to  the  3/2  power.   Data on  the
instantaneous  values of  the spreading  of plumes  and puffs  (i.e., on  relative diffusion)  shows
that  this  law  describes  diffusion  up to  t  on  the order  of  an hour (Gifford, 1976a).   On the
other hand  the time-average spreading  of plumes was shown by  Taylor  (1921) to obey the asymp-
totic laws  o  « t  for  small t-values  and a <*  tl/2 in  the  limit of large  t-values.   Diffusion
depends both  on travel time from  source to receptor,  and  on  the sampling  time,  that is, the
time  over  which the  concentration  is  averaged at the receptor point.   The  situation is made
more complicated by the fact that cross-wind diffusion behaves markedly different from vertical
                                              6-25

-------
diffusion  in the boundary  layer  because of the  inhibiting effect on vertical turbulence fluctu-
ations  imposed by  the  presence  of  the ground,  and  because of  the  strong damping  effect  of
stability  on vertical turbulent  motions.
     A  number  of  attempts have  been  made to  express  horizontal  and  vertical  boundary layer
diffusion  for  flat  uniform terrain,  as  measured by the  lengths  oy and  oz,  to more  or  less
easily  measured  quantities that  characterize boundary  layer  thermal  and mechanical  turbulence
properties.    Extensive  surveys  of the  literature on  the subject, have  been  undertaken  by
Gifford  (1976b)  and Weber  (1976).  The former stressed the common logic underlying various and
sometimes  seemingly conflicting  schemes,  as well  as the need to evaluate many exceptional cases
that arise in  practical applications.
     Based on  these analyses and those of Pasquill  (1975, 1976), the diffusion parameterization
originally suggested by Pasquill (1961)   is  valid for sources  located at  or  fairly  near  the
surface, for uniform underlying  terrain,  and for receptors up  to several  kilometers distance.
Extension  to greater distances,  varying surface roughness,  and  other generalizations have been
discussed  Smith  (1972)  as well  as relations  to surface-layer turbulence  parameters,  Golder
(1972)  and Draxler  (1976).  The difficulties that have arisen  in applying  this methodology to
practical  air  pollution  problems  have centered  around,   cases  for which  the  turbulence  is
produced or modified by factors which extend beyond the purely  thermal  and mechanical  compo-
nents that  control  the local boundary  layer turbulence.
6.4.2  Horizontal  Transport and  Pollutant Residence Times
     The horizontal distance over  which  a pollutant is transported  is strongly influenced  by
its overall lifetime or residence time  in the atmosphere, the characteristics of the mean wind,
and the time of day and height at which the pollutant is emitted into the atmosphere.
     Residence times for  pollutants,  are governed  by  the extent of wet  and  dry  removal  and
chemical transformation the pollutant  species  undergoes in  the  atmosphere.   Depicted in Figure
6-7 are  estimated   residence times  for typical  pollutants  and  their  associated characteristic
horizontal  meteorological  scale.   Average wind  speeds  of 5 m/sec were  assumed in approximating
the distance scale.  Residence time  estimates are  based on  Junge (1972,  1974).
     Transport scales for  pollutants such as SO? which have  appreciable dry deposition veloc-
ities, will be sensitive  to the  relative height  at  which  the pollutant is  emitted.   Pollutant
distributions  also will  be sensitive to  the  stability  of  the atmosphere which  will  govern the
extent of  vertical  mixing to the  surfaces.
     Industrial  facilities emitting  large  quantities  of S02 have  tried to take  advantage  of
these natural  meteorological  phenomena to  reduce ambient  levels  of  SO?  in  the  vicinity  of
their stacks.   By building taller  effluent  stacks,  emitting facilities succeed  in injecting
SC>2 at  higher  levels  in  the  atmosphere,  allowing the pollutant  more time  to disperse  and
transport  before reaching  ground  level,  thereby  affectively reducing  ground  level  concentra-
                                              6-26

-------
RESIDENCE
TIME.hr
103
m^ -^

10° -«
10'1 -



HORIZONTAL
LENGTH
SCALE


200 km
<" 20 km
2 km



CLIMATOLOGICAL
SCALE
PCB's







SYNOPTIC AND
PLANETARY
SCALE

0.1— 1.0 ^m
PARTICLES





MESO
SCALE


so2
r




MICRO-SCALE



2
a; 50 pm
PARTICLES



 Figure 6-7. Estimated  residence times for select pollutant species and their associated hori-
zontal transport scale.
                                            6-27

-------
tions  of S02 as  a result.   A  great  deal  of controversy arose regarding  this  approach  and as
to whether  it  was circumventing the intent of the Clean Air Act.  As a result of the Clean Air
Act Amendments of  1977  the Environmental Protection Agency requires that the degree of emission
limitation necessary  for  control  of any air  pollutant can not be achieved through the construc-
tion  of  stacks  higher than  would be considered  appropriate  using good  engineering practice
design  standards.   An  interesting corollary of  the tall  stack  issue  is the potential for such
sources  to  enhance the  production of particulate sulfate.   As a result  of  SC>2 being emitted
at higher levels  in the  atmosphere the probability of its removal by dry deposition is lowered,
extending  its  lifetime in  the  atmosphere  and subsequently  enhancing  its probability to trans-
form through chemical reaction  to particulate sulfate.
     Of  particular importance to horizontal  transport is the strength and time of formation of
the nocturnal  inversion,  a stable  layer of  air  formed at the  surface  due to the differential
cooling  of  the earth's surface  relative to  the  air  at night.   The  depth of this stable layer
can vary from approximately 50  m  to 500 m  depending on meteorological conditions.  At the onset
of the nocturnal  inversion  all  pollutants  present   in  the well mixed layer from  that day's
emission  are  cut  off from the surface by this  stable  layer of air.   No  major  mechanisms for
transport  through this  layer exist;  so dry deposition  processes virtually  stop,  leaving the
pollutant  reservoir  aloft  free  to transport long distances with negligible  losses.   In addi-
tion,  horizontal   mean  winds  are  typically  enhanced  in  layers  aloft  due to the reduction in
frictional  drag  at the earth's  surface as  a result of  the presence  of  the stable nocturnal
layer.   Associated with  this overall  process is a phenomenon  of the  particular importance to
nighttime  transport,  the nocturnal  jet.    Blackadar  (1957) described  the mechanism  for the
formation of the  nocturnal  jet  as due to decoupling of winds previously restrained by friction-
al forces  at  the  surface,  and  now free to  accelerate  in response  to existing pressure gradi-
ents;  as  a  result some overshooting  in wind speed occurs as the flow  attempts  to establish a
new balance  with   inertial  forces.  Bonner (1968)  examined  two years of  upper  level  wind data
from the National  Weather Services rawinsonde network to determine the frequency  and geographi-
cal distribution of the  low-level jet.  Recently, high-resolution measurements of wind profiles
collected over central  Illinois,  Sisterson And Frenzen (1978), showed that nocturnal, low-level
wind  maxima occur more  frequently  than   indicated in  the   analysis  performed  by Bonner.   In
these studies, low-level  wind maxima  were  observed on 24 out of a total of 30 nights for which
meteorological  field  experiments were conducted  in  the  summers  of  1975 and  1976.   Typical
average wind  speed profiles observed under  the  decoupled conditions  showed wind speeds of the
order of  1-2  m s~* near the surface  increasing  to maximum values of  8  m s~* at  100-200 meters
above the surface.
     It is quite apparent  that  the nocturnal  jet and nighttime flows in general are significant
factors in the transport  of pollutants over  long distances.
                                               6-28

-------
     Definitive studies on the long range  transport  of  atmospheric tracers have been primarily
associated with radioactive debris, Islitzer  and  Slade  (1968),  and in many instances at height
levels not  of  particular interest for  air pollution related work.   Some  analyses  of ambient
data  have been  performed to  provide qualitative  indications   of the  long  range  aspects  of
certain  pollutant  species,  Altshuller  (1976),  Lyons and  Husar  (1976),  Rodhe et al.  (1972),
Brosset and Akerstrom (1972),  but very few quantitative  studies  exists.   The major reason being
lack of appropriate experimental data.   Recent  monitoring  and field study programs designed to
address  the long  range  transport air  pollution phenomenon,  should  alleviate  this  problem
somewhat, Perhac (1978), MacCracken (1978), Schiermeier  et  al. (1979).
6.5  AIR QUALITY SIMULATION MODELING
     The  principal role  of  the air quality simulation  model  is  to describe quantitatively the
relationship between  emissions distribution  and  ambient  air quality  in time and space.   Air
quality  simulation  models provide  a  vehicle for improved  understanding  of the  physical  and
chemical  processes operative  in  polluted  atmospheres,  and a means to  sound,  creditably based
scientific decisions  on the nature and  extent  of emission control required  to  meet specified
ambient air quality.
     The  development of the air  quality  simulation model  (AQSM)  has its origins as far back as
the early 1930's when Sutton (1932) introduced his basic theory on diffusion in the atmosphere,
which established the  foundation for  the Gaussian equations  used in  describing  the  dispersion
of effulents  in the  atmosphere.    The evolution  of  AQSM's has  continued  since  then,  treating
increasingly  complex   air  pollution  problems  and  utilizing  advanced   theoretical  approaches
in describing  the details  of  the physical  and  chemical processes operative in the atmosphere.
The use  of mathematical models  for air  quality impact  analysis  associated with  S02 and total
suspended particulate  matter,  both criteria pollutants, has been a standard practice over the
years, though discretionary, prior to  the passage of the Clean Air Act Amendment in 1977.  With
the passage  of the  1977  amendments,  the  Environmental Protection  Agency is now required to
take  certain regulatory steps  related to the use of  air  quality  simulation models.   The work
horse of  operational  air quality  simulation  modeling has  been  the single  and multiple source
Gaussian  plume  models.   The predominant use  of these models  has  been the prediction of ground
level concentrations  in  the  immediate vicinity to several  kilometers downwind of the effluent
source.   Many  reviews on dispersion  modeling are available, see for example,  Gifford (1968),
Strom (1976) and Turner (1979).  Section 6.5.1 provides  a brief  discussion on the status of the
Gaussian  modeling techniques,  while  Section  6.5.2  discuss the  scientific  basis  and status of
air quality  simulation modeling  over long  distance  scales and  their impact  on  furthering our
understanding  of  the  physical  and chemical  processes   affecting  the  fate of  SOj  and  particu-
late  matter  in the  air  environment.   In  Section 6.5.3,  a discussion  of  model  evaluation and
data bases is provided.
                                              6-29

-------
6.5.1  Gaussian Plume Modeling Techniques
     The  Gaussian  diffusion formulation used  in a variety of  air  quality simulation modeling
approaches  is a result  of the  Gaussian or normal  distribution function  being  a fundamental
solution  to  the  Fickian diffusion equation, which  strictly  speaking  applies  only in the limit
of large  diffusion time and for  homogeneous, stationary conditions.
     The  Gaussian  diffusion formulation for  a continuous point  source  emitting  pollutants  at
height h  and  calculated receptor concentrations at ground level  is given by
                                         Q              y2     h2
                              x(x,y)  = -  exp [ -( - - + - )]                 (1)
                                                      2
-------
of horizontal  wind  fluctuations-; bulk Richardson  number as determined from  temperature,  10 m
wind  speed  and  2  and  10  m temperature  differences;  height of  surface  boundary  layer  under
unstable conditions;  and  the top of the  inversion  under stable atmospheric  conditions.   Addi-
tional improvements will  be gained as existing theories  and experimental  data bases  are  drawn
together in a  unified scheme for estimating dispersion  parameters  as  a function of stability,
effluent release height and surface roughness.
     A variety of operational Gaussian air  quality  dispersion  models,  used for the majority of
SO?  and  total  suspended  particulate  matter  regulatory applications,  are   available  through
EPA's UNAMAP,  User's  Network for  Applied Modeling  of Air  Pollution.   A  brief description of
these models can be found in Turner (1979).
     Finally,  an additional important aspect to dispersion modeling calculations is the predic-
tion of  the effective height of the  effluent  release,  so called "plume rise", which strongly
affects the predicted ground  level  concentration of pollutants.  Significant research into the
processes affecting plume  rise  and its prediction  has  been underway for over  the  past  twenty
years.   Recently,   Briggs  (1975)  reviewed  the physics  of  plume rise  and its  prediction  and
presented basic  formulations  for calculating the height to which plumes rise as a function of
atmospheric stability  and  several   standard  stack  parameters.   He  indicates  that  the greatest
need for further investigation,  concerns  plume rise limited by ambient turbulence under convec-
tive atmospheric conditions.
6.5.2  Long Range Air  Pollution  Modeling
     The growing  interest  in the  long range transport  of  air  pollutants  in  recent  years  has
resulted in several  extensive reviews on  the subject, Bass (1980), Eliassen (1980), Pack  et al.
(1978), Smith and Hunt (1978).  Long range is defined here as horizontal scales of the order of
1000 km  resulting   in  transport  times of  the  order of  several days.   Typical model  spatial
resolutions on this scale  range  from 20  to 100 km.  As  concluded by Bass  (1980),  the majority
of  long  range  transport models  are Lagrangian based.    The Lagrangian approach  represents an
emitting  source  element  by  a  series of  discrete  pollutant  parcels  which  are  advected  and
diffused by a  time and space dependent  wind  field.   In principle, the  individual  pollutant
parcels  can treat  time-dependent   chemical  transformation, dry  deposition   and  precipitation
scavenging  processes.    Fixed space-time  averages of pollutants  are generated by superimposing
all elements that pass  a specified point over the  averaging time of interest.   The Lagrangian
models, although all cut from the same basic theoretical fabric, have developed various nuances
in their evolution.
     In reviewing the  models, very little consensus  of  opinion  surfaces with  regard to standard
treatments  for:  1)   wind field analysis;  2)   choice  of wind  height  level  for trajectory; 3)
mixing height variations; and 4)   dry  and wet  removal  and chemical  transformation rates.   Even
the basic generation  of discrete air parcels  is viewed from four  different  approaches:   puff
super-position, segmented plume, square  puff,  and  statistical.   Three  of  the approaches  which
                                              6-31

-------
are  readily  depicted,  Figure 6-8 Bass (1980), are contrasted to the idealized continuous plume
they are attempting to represent.
     Eulerian  or grid-based  approaches  have been  less prevalent  in  long-range  transport  air
pollution modeling.  This may  to some extent  result from problems associated with the numerical
integration  of  the  advection equation which give rise to pseudo-diffusion effects.  But a more
likely reason is the increased complexity  and enhanced  data base and computational requirements
of the Eulerian models.
     Table 6-7  provides  a representative  sampling of  long-range  transport models discussed in
the  available  literature and  presents for each  referenced model:  a  brief  description of  the
modeling approach,  including characteristic averaging  times;  approaches to dry and wet removal
and chemical transformati )n; and pollutant  species modeled.
     A review  of the mod .'Is presented  in  Table  6-7  indicates that  sulfur dioxide and sulfates
have been the species of major interest.   This stems from the fact that many of the models were
developed  with  the  specific  intent of  addressing  the  acid rain  phenomenon.    These sulfur
species have been  identified  as major contributing  factors  in the  acidification of precipita-
tion.  Though  none of the models  as presently configured consider  primary emitted particulate
matter, their inclusion would  be reasonably straightforward given the availability of appropri-
ate emission inventories.   The far  more  difficult  tasks  of  considering the gas to particulate
matter forming  processes of  nitrates  and  organic species, aerosol dynamic  processes and size
distributions  remain  for future research  to  resolve.   Until  these basic  processes  as well as
gas-liquid phase transfer  and  solution  phase chemistry of rain droplets are adequately treated
within the models, significant skepticism  as  to  the scientific creditability and utility of the
models will  remain.
     In  a similar  manner,  regional visibility impairment,  which  results  from  the physical
interaction  of  sunlight  with light absorbing gases and particulate  matter and light scattering
aerosols,  requires  the consideration of  many of the process  indicated  above.   Though several
empirical  analysis  techniques  have been developed recently which provide a qualitative under-
standing of  the scope and general meteorological  characteristics of  the visibility  impairment
problem, no  adequate quantitative relationships presently are available  for  emission control
strategy assessments.
     Although  verification  studies  of  long  range  transport  models  are limited,  it  has been
recognized for  some time  that errors in  observed wind direction,  Pack et  al.  (1978) and  the
specification of wind fields  in general,  Sykes  and  Hatton (1976),  Smith  and  Hunt (1978),  and
Draxler  (1979)  can  result  in drastic  errors  in spatial predictions  over long  range travel
distances.
     A significant contribution to uncertainties in  transport prediction resides in the sparse
temporal and spatial resolve  of  upper  level wind  information.   The  National  Weather Service
                                              fi-32

-------
                   CONTINUOUS
                   PLUME
                                        SEGMENTED
                                        PLUME
                                        MODEL
CTt
I
CO
CO
PUFF
SUPERPOSITION
MODEL
'SQUARE PUFF*
MODEL
                                          Figure 6-8.  Trajectory modeling approaches.

-------
                                            TABLE  6-7.   SUMMARY OF SELECT  LONG RANGE TRANSPORT AIR  POLLUTION MODELS
.
Model
bsaz
AKL-AIAP1 purr trajectory
HWIW-1,-22 purr trajectory
r.NAI1AI'-1
Mf.SDPMrr' pufr trajectory
IIESIII'LIIME* olume senment
trajectory
1 ,AS1HAP5 statistical
[pj trajectory
AII!51IX purr trajectory/
vert ical • Tinite
dirrerence
MISU Clill/' qrid
Uescr ipt ion
Avcraqinn 1 ime
daily to yearly
daily to yearly
dai ly to yearly
daily to yearly
monthly lo yearly
dai ly to yearly
daily to monthly

Heiiinvnl I'roi.'ess
rirst order wet
and dry removal
first order wet 5(1
and dry removal
I'irst order Sll
dry removal
first order 5
dry removal
diurnal and seasonal
dependent dry removal
Tirst order wel removal
rirst order wet
and dry removal
first order wet
and dry removal

Chemical I'rucess Pollulanl Species
none Inert Substances
2 first order decay 502 and 50^
2 firr.l order decay 502 and SO:
1*2 first order decay 5(12 and SO:
diurnal and seasonal 502 anf^ ^n
dependent 5112
firsl order dacay
502 first order decay 502 ""^ 50;
typically S02 first 502 and SOj
order decay
Reference
Merrier et al. (1975)
Merrier (11HM)
.Inhnson Rt al . ( 197H)
Manciiso et al. ( 1979)
Hliumralknr ( 19(1(1)
lienkley and Mass ( 1979a)
Renkley and Mass ( 1979h)
Shannon (197'')
Shieh (1977)
Meyers et^ al. (1979)
Morris et al. (1979)

1  see also model hy  Start  and Wendell (1974).


2  r.ne alr.o models hy  Eliasen (197B), Nnrdo  (1976)
  arid lliasen and Saltbones (1975).

5  r,ei! alr.o models hy  Draxler (1977, 1979).
4 see alr.n models  hy  McNaiinhton (19HII). Hales el  al . (1977)
  I'enderriar.l  (1979)  and llciuni (19HO).

^ r.ee alno models  hy  llolin and I'nssnn  (1975),
  Fislii-r (1975,  197H) and Scrivrn and F ir.linr  (1975).

fl uee alr.n models  hy  tui and Durran (1977),  Hao pi  al . (1976),
  l.avery el al .  (-191111) and Carmicliael and  Peters  (1979).

-------
rawinsonde  network  provides  vertical  wind  speed  and  direction,  temperature,  and  moisture
profiles every 12 hours at seventy sites across the continental U.S.  This provides  upper-level
winds  at  a  horizontal resolution  of  the  order  400 kilometers,  considerably  less  resolved
than the  20 to 80 kilometer grid  spacing  required  in air quality  simulation  modeling techni-
ques.  Increased temporal  resolution in upper level  winds should also diminish tranport predic-
tion uncertainties.
6.5.3  Model Evaluation and Data Bases
     The evaluation/verification  of  long range  transport  models through comparisons  of  model
predictions with observation has been almost nonexistent. The major deterent has been insuffic-
ient or in many  cases,  inappropriate  monitoring  data  for the spatial scales of interest.   Long
range  transport  models predict  ambient pollutant  concentrations  that  are representative  of
horizontal  spatial  averages  of  the order  of  10-3  square  kilometers.    Standard  monitoring
networks,  established  for local high level  concentration  measurements within  the  vicinity  of
the  emission  sources do not provide representative data for long range models.  Some routine
monitoring data for  S0£ and S04 from  the EPA Storage  and Retrieval of Aerometric Data (SAROAD)
system has had some  utility in  model  testing (Bhumralkar,  1980) but in general has  proven less
than adequate.   The SURE  air  quality network (Perhac,  1978)   which operated  over  the period
August 1977  to October 1978,  has  provided to date  the  most  extensive  S02 and  $04  data base
for  long  range transport  model  evaluation.   But even these data collected over this limited
period are only  sufficient during  the  intensive  study  periods,  August  1977,  October  1977,
mid-January  to  mid-February 1978,  April 1978,  July 1978  and  October  1978,  when   an extend-
ed 54  site  monitoring network  was  activated.    During the  SURE study period,  data  also  exist
from the  MAP3S  precipitation  chemistry network (MacCracken,  1978)  which  had at  least four
sites  operational  during   the  program.   No dry deposition  data  are  available for  the  study
period.  Since the data have only recently become available, they have had  limited use, but
future long-range transport model  evaluations are certain to consider their use.
     Another limitation in model  evaluation studies is  the  quality of  the  emission  inventory.
Until recently a national  gridded  emission  inventory did  not  even exist.   Clark (1980) prepared
on annual gridded  emissions  inventory  for  the United States  and Southern  Canada east of the
Rocky  Mountains  utilizing data compiled by the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency and the
Ontario Ministry of  the Environment and Environment  Canada.   In  preparing the gridded inven-
tory,  he  found significant errors  in  many of the  U.S.  point  source  records  which had  to  be
corrected.   Models,  like  chains, are only  as  strong  as  their weakest link.   Certainly emission
inventories  must be viewed as  candidates in this  role.
     As mentioned at the outset, long-range  transport model  evaluations  are extremely limited,
but two recent studies should  be noted.
     Mancuso et  al.  (1979) evaluated a  trajectory  puff  model  using monthly averages  from the
OECD monitoring program.   They  generated two  sets of  evaluation results.   The first  considered
                                               6-35

-------
model  predictions versus  observations using  parameters  originally  specified  for the  model.
This  resulted  in root  mean  square (RMS) differences  of  12.9 and 4.8  ug/m3 for  $03  and $04,
respectively.   In the second evaluation, half of the data was used to optimize model parameters
through  a  regression analysis  technique  and then the  remaining  half of the data  was  used  to
evaluate the model.   This resulted in RMS differences of 7.7 and 2.9 yg/m3 for S02 and $04 and
correlation  coefficients of 0.72 both for  S02 and $04,  a marked improvement  in  the  model's
performance.  None of the optimized parameters  assumed values which were physically unrealistic.
Lavery et al. (1980) evaluated  a  grid model  using data from the SURE monitoring network and
based on 24-hour averaged concentrations.  Four days were selected for parameter "adjust-
ments"  and  "fine tuning" and  additional  three days were  used  for the model evaluation.   RMS
differences for  SO?  ranged from  6.9  to 23.4  \i g/m3 for the  three  days,  with a mean  value  of
14.1  yg/m3.   RMS differences  for S04  ranged from 5.2  to  14.4  yg/m3 with  a  mean value  of
9.3  ug/m3.   Mean correlation  coefficients  for  S02  and  $04 for the  three days  tested were
0.31 and 0.53, respectively.
     Overall, the  results from both  models  are encouraging.   Evaluation of  a  trajectory puff
model  for  the  U.S., Bhumralkar  (1980),  using the  SURE  data base  is also  showing  promising
results.
6.5.4  Atmospheric Budgets
     Atmospheric  budgets have   proven  a  convenient  technique for evaluating  on  a  quantitative
basis the overall source and sink  contributions of specified pollutant species within a select-
ed  region  of  interest.   The  budget  is  formulated  by estimating the  various  input and output
processes associated with the region, as anthropogenic and natural emissions, pollutant concen-
tration  inflow  and  outflow,   and wet  and  dry removal.    Budget analyses  provide a  general
indication over  the  long-term  of  the  significant factors  contributing to  the pollutant burden
in  a given region.   Sulfur  budgets have been of greatest interest both in Europe,  Rodhe (1972,
1978),  Garland  (1978)  and  in  North America,  Galloway  and  Whelpdale (1980), primarily  due  to
sulfur's  association  with  the  acid  precipitation  phenomenon.    Conclusions  drawn  from  the
eastern  North   American sulfur  budget by  Galloway and  Whelpdale  (1980)  were that  man-made
emissions exceed natural ones  by a factor  of  10;  wet and dry deposition over  the region are
approximately equivalent;  and  at  least one-quarter of  the  emissions  leaves  the  region  via the
atmosphere to  the east.   As  with western  Europe  the  North  American  budget  showed that man's
activities dominates the regional  atmospheric sulfur cycle.
6.6  SUMMARY
     The processes governing  the  transport  and diffusion,  chemical  transformation and  wet and
dry  removal  of  sulfur  dioxide  and particulate matter  in the atmosphere  are extremely complex
and  not  completely understood.   The  oxidation rates of S02  observed  in  industrial plumes and
urban  atmospheres range  from   0-15%  h'l and  would seem  to  be  only partially accounted  for
through homogeneous  gas phase  reactions.   Liquid  phase catalytic oxidation reactions involving
Mn  and carbon  are possible contributing sources  to the observed oxidation  rates,  but  further
                                               6-36

-------
research is required to quantify these processes under typical atmospheric conditions.
     The dry  deposition of  S02  is fairly  well understood  as  a result of  extensive measure-
ments over various canopies.  Particle  dry  deposition has focused more on the physical aspects
of the  deposition  process,  that  is the aerodynamic  and  has  very little supportive measurement
data on particles with compositions typical  of those found in the polluted atmosphere.
     Our understanding  of  the wet  removal of  S02  has progressed considerably in recent years,
including the consideration  of  solution phase  chemistry  within  rain  droplets.   While particle
removal, as with gases, is extremely dependent on the physical characterization of the precipi-
tation  events which  may in  many  instances  be  the  determining  factor  in  accurate wet removal
prediction.
     The characterization  of the dynamics of  the  planetary boundary  layer  is  essential  to an
adequate understanding  of  pollutant transport  and  diffusion over all  spatial  scales.   Though
considerable  advances  have been  made in  this  area,  our ability to predict  mean transport and
diffusion over  long  distance scales is  less than adequate.   This  in  part  is due,  no doubt, to
the  sparse  spatial  and temporal  resolution  of the upper  air  wind  observation  network used
to generate the transport winds.
     Present generation long range transport air pollution models consider simple parameteriza-
tion for chemical transformation and wet and dry removal, and varying degrees of sophistication
in the  treatment of  transport and  diffusion.   None of the models adequately treat the dynamics
of the  planetary boundary.   Evaluations of  long range transport models, though  limited because
of  lack of  data bases, have  shown that with further  research and   development  these models
should  prove to  be  adequate  tools  in addressing  air  pollution  issues  associated  with the
movement of pollutant emission over long distance scales.
                                              6-37

-------
*
6.6  REFERENCES

Abrahamsen,  G. ,   R.  Horntvedt,  and B.  Tveite.    Impact  of acid  precipitation  on coniferous
     forest  ecosystems.   Proc.  First  International Symposium  on Acid  Precipitation  and the
     Forest  Ecosystem (1975).  USDA Forest Service  General  Tech.  Report  NE23, 1976.

Acres Consulting  Services Ltd.--Applied Earth Science Consultants  Inc.   Atmospheric loading of
     the  upper  Great Lakes.   Vol.  2.  (Report  for  Canada  Centre for  Inland Waters.),  1974.

Alkezweeny,  A. J. ,  and  D. C.  Powell.   Estimation of transformation  rate  of  SO- and SO. from
     atmospheric  concentration data.  Atmos. Environ. ^1:179-182,  1977.

Altshuller,  A. P.  Regional  transport and transformation  of sulfur dioxide to sulfates  in the
     United  States.  J.  Air Pollut. Control Assoc.  26:318-324,  1976.

Altshuller,  A. P.   Model  predictions of the  rates of homogeneous oxidation  of  sulfur dioxide
     to sulfate in the troposphere.  Atmos.  Environ. 13:1653-1662, 1979.

Bakulin,  V.  N. ,  E.  E.  Senko,  B.  G.  Starikov,  and  V. A. Trufakin.  Investigation  of turbulent
     exchange and washout by measurement of natural  radioactivity  in  surface  air.  J. Geophys.
     Res. 75:3669-3674,  1970.

Banerji,  P.,  and  D.  D.  Chatterjee.  Radon content  of rainwater.   Nature,  Lond.  204:1185-1186,
     1964.

Barrie,   L.  A.    An  improved model  of  reversible  S0,-washout  by  rain.   Atmos.  Environ.
     12:407-412,   1978.                                   *

Bass, A., C. W.  Brenkley, J. S.  Scire, and C. S. Morris.  Development of mesoscale air quality
     simulation  models.   Vol.   1.  Comparative  Sensitivity Studies  of Puff, Plume  and Grid
     Models  for  Long-Distance   Dispersion  Modeling.    EPA  600/7-79-XX,  U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, NC,  1979a.  238 pp.

Bass, A.   Modeling long-range transport and  diffusion.   I_n:    Proc.  of  Second  Joint Conf.  on
     Applications of Air  Pollution Meteorology.   American Meteorological Society,  March  24-27,
     1980, New Orleans,  LA, pp.  193-215.

Batchelor, G. K.   The Theory of  Homogeneous Turbulence.  Cambridge University Press, 1953.  ix
     and  197 pp.

Beilke,   S.   Laboratory  investigations  on  washout  of   trace   gases.   I_n:   precipitation
     Scavenging (1970),  Proceedings of a Symposium, Battelle Pacific Northwest  Laboratory and
     U.S. Atomic  Energy Commission, Richland, Washington, June  2-4, 1970.  R. J. Engelmann and
     W.  G.  N.  Slinn,  eds. ,  AEC  Symposium Series 22, U.S. Atomic  Energy  Commission, Oak  Ridge,
     TN,  December 1970.    pp. 261-269.

Beilke, S. ,  and  D.  Lamb.   Remarks on the rate of  formation of  bisulfite ions in aqueous  solu-
     tion.  Am.  Inst.  Chem.  Eng.   21:402-405, 1975.

Beilke, S. , D. Lamb, and  J.  Muller.  On the uncatalyzed oxidation  of  atmospheric S0? by  oxygen
     in aqueous system.    Atmos.  Environ. 9:1083-1090, 1975.

Belot,   Y.,  and   D.  Gauthier.   Transport  of  Micronic  Particles  from  Atmosphere  to   Foliar
     Surfaces.   In:   Heat and Mass Transfer  in  the Biosphere.  I.  Transfer  Process in  Plant
     Environment.   D. A.  de Vires and N. H. Afgan,  eds., John Wiley  and Sons, New York,  1975.
     pp.  583-591.
SOX6A/D                                      6-38                                   2-3-81

-------
Benkley, C.  W.,  and A.  Bass.   Development of mesoscale air quality simulation models.  Vol. 3.
     User's guide  to MESOPUFF  (mesoscale  puff) model.   EPA-600/7-79-XXX,  U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1979a.  124 ppr.

Benkley, C. W. ,  and  A.  Bass.   Development of mesoscale air quality simulation models. Vol. 2.
     User's  guide  to  MESOPLUME  (mesoscale  plume  segment)  model.    EPA-600/7-79-XXX,  U.S.
     Environmental  Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1979b.  141 pp.

Berlyand,  M.   E.   Modern  Problems  in  Atmospheric  Diffusion  and  Atmospheric   Pollution.
     Hydromet.  Press, Leningrad, 1974.   448 pp.

Bhumralkar, C.  M. , R.  L.  Mancuso, D. E. Wolf, R.  A. Thuillier, K. C. Nitz, and W. B. Johnson.
     ENAMAP-1 Long-Term  Air  Pollution Model  -  Adaptation  and  Application to  eastern North
     America.   Prepared under EPA Contract 68-02-2959.  Final Report.  May 1980.  93  pp.

Blackadar,   A.   K.    Boundary  layer  wind  maxima   and  their  significance for  the  growth of
     nocturnal  inversions.   Bull.  Am. Meteorol. Soc. 38:283290, 1957.

Bolin, B. ,  and  C.  Persson.   Regional dispersion and deposition of atmospheric pollutants with
     particular application to sulfur pollution over western Europe.  Tellus 27:281-310, 1975.

Bonner, W.  D.   Climatology of the low level jet.   Mon. Weather Rev. 96:833-850, 1968.

Boussinesq, J.   Mem.  pres.  par div.  savant a 1'acad. sci.   Paris 23:46, 1877.

                                               90
Bowen, V.  T. ,  and T.  T.  Sugihara.  Strontium   in the  "mixed-layer"  of the  Atlantic Ocean.
     Nature (London)  186:71-72,  1960.

Briggs,  G.  A.    Plume  rise  predictions.    In:   lectures  on  air pollution  and  environmental
     impact analysis, D.  Haugen, ed., Am.  Meteor.  Soc., 1975.

Brimblecombe,  P.,  and  D.  J.  Spedding.   The catalytic oxidation  of  micromolar aqueous sulfur
     dioxide.   Atmos. Environ 8:937-945, 1974.

Brosset, C. ,  and A.  Akerstrom.    Long  distance transport of air  pollutants  -  measurements of
     black  airborne  particulate matter (soot) and particle-borne sulphur in Sweden  during the
     period of September-December 1969.  Atmos. Environ.  6:661-672, 1972.

Burtsev, I. I.,  V. A.  Burtseva, and S.  K.  Malakou.  Washout characteristics of a 32P aerosol
     injected into a cloud.   Atmos. Scavenging of  Radio-isotopes.  (Edited by Styra B.) NTIS,
     1970.

Campbell, M.  J. , J. C.  Sheppard, and B. F.  Au.  Geophys.  Res. Lett. 6:175, 1979.

Cantrell, B.  K., and K.  T. Whitby.  Aerosol  size  distributions  and  aerosol  volume  formation
     for a  coal-fired power plant plume.  Atmos.  Environ.  12:323-334, 1978.

Carmichael, G.  R. , and L.  K.  Peters.   Numerical  simulation of the  regional  transport of S0?
     and sulfate in  the  eastern United States.  Preprints. Fourth Symp.  on Turbulence, Diffu-
     sion and Air  Pollution.  American Meteorological Society, January 10-18, 1979,  Reno, NV.
     pp.  337-344.

Carter, W.  P.  L., A.  C.  Lloyd, J.  L. Sprung, and J. N. Pitts, Jr.  Int. J. Chem.  Kinet. 11:45,
     1979.

Cawse,  P.  A.    A  survey  of  atmospheric  trace elements  in  the  U.K.  (1972-73).   Environ.  &
     Medical  Science  Division.  AERE Harwell, U.K.  Report R 7669, 1974.
SOX6A/D                                      6-39                                   2-3-81

-------
*
Chamberlain,  A.  C.   Aspects o.f  travel  and deposition of  aerosol  and  vapour clouds.  A.E.R.E.
     HP/R 1261, 1953.

Chamberlain,  A.  C.,  and  R.   C.  Chadwick.   Deposition  of  airborne  radio-iodine  vapor.
     Nucleonics 8:22-25, 1953.

Chamberlain,  A.  C.   Aspects of  the deposition of radioactive  and  other gases and particles.
     Int. J. Air Pollut. 3:63-88, 1960.

Chamberlain,  A.  C.    Transport   of Lycopodium  spores  and  other  small  particles  to  rough
     surfaces.  Proc. R. Soc. A 296:45-70, 1967.

Chamberlain,  A.  C. ,  and   R.  C.  Chadwick.    Deposition  of   spores  and  other  particles  on
     vegetation and  soil.  Ann. Appl. Biol. 72:141-158, 1972.

Chamberlain,  A.  C.   Deposition  of SO^  by gaseous  diffusion.   Unpublished manuscript,  1973.

Chamberlain, A. C.   Movement of  Particles in Plant  Communities.  _In:  Vegetation in the Atmo-
     sphere.  J. L.  Monteith, ed.,  Academic Press  Inc. , New York, 1975.   pp.  155-201.

Chamberlain,  A.  C.   Dry  deposition of  sulfur dioxide.    In:   Atmospheric  Sulfur Deposition,
     Environmental   Impact  and   Health  Effects,  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Life  Sciences
     Symposium,  Department of  Energy,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  and Tennessee
     Valley  Authority, Gatlinburg,  Tennessee,  October  14-18,  1979.    D.  S.  Shriner,  C.  R.
     Richmond,  and  S.   E.  Lindberg, eds., Ann Arbor  Science  Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI,
     1980, pp.  185-197.

Chameides, W. L. , and J. C. Walker.  J. Geophys. Res.  78:8751,  1973.

Chameides, W. C., and J. C. Walker.  J. Geophys. Res.  81:413,  1976.

Chang,  T.  Y.   Estimate  of the  conversion rate of  S0?  to SO.  from the DaVince Flight Data.
     Atmos.  Environ. 13:1633-1664,  1979.

Clark,  T.   L.   Annual   anthropogenic pollutant  emissions  in  the  United States  and Southern
     Canada  east of  the Rocky Mountains.   Atmos. Environ.  14:961-970, 1980.

Clough, W. S.   Transport of particles to a surface.   J. Aerosol Sci. 4:227-234,  1973.

Clough,  W.   S.   The deposition   of particles  on  moss  and grass  surfaces.   Atmos.  Environ.
     9:1113-1119, 1975.

Cobourn,  W.   G. ,  R. B.  Husar,  and J.  D.  Husar.    Continuous  ir\  situ  monitoring  of ambient
     particulate  sulfur   using   flame  photometry  and  thermal   analysis.    Atmos.  Environ.
     12:89-98,  1978.

Craig,  D.  K. ,  B. L. Klepper,  and  R.  L. Buschbom.   Deposition of  various  piutoniurn—compound
     aerosol   on   to  plant  foliage  at  very  low  wind velocities.   Proceedings  of  the
     Atmospheric-Surface Exchange of Particulate & Gaseous Pollutants.   AEC Symp. Series CONF.
     740921  NTIS. 244:261,  1976.

Crutzen, P.  J.  Tellus  26:47, 1974.

Csanady, G.  T.   Turbulent Diffusion in the  Environment.   D.  Reidel  Publishing Co., Dordrecht,
     Holland, 1973.  X  and 248 pp.

Dana,  M.  T.   Scavenging  of soluble  dye particles  by rain.   Proceedings  of  the Symposium on
     Precipitation Scavenging.   USAEC  Symp.  Series 22:137-147,  1970.


SOX6A/D                                       6-40                                   2-3-81

-------
*
Dana, M.  T.,  and J.  M.  Hales.   Precipitation Scavenging, 1974.  ERDA.

Dana, M.  T.,  J.  M.  Hales, and M.  A. Wolf.  Rain scavenging of S0? and sulfate from power plant
     plumes.   J. Geophys. Res.  80:4119-4129, 1975.              ^

Dana, M.  T. ,  and J.  M.  Hales.   Statistical  aspects of the  washout  of  polydisperse aerosols.
     Atmos.  Environ.  10:45-50,  1976.

Dana, M.  T.   S0? versus sulfate wet deposition in the eastern United States.  J. Geophy. Res.
     85:4475-448T),  1980.

Davidson, C.  I.,  and   S.  K.  Friedlander.   A  filteration model  for aerosol  dry deposition:
     Application to  trace metal  deposition from the atmosphere.  J.  Geophys.  Res.   83:2343,
     1978.

Davis, D. D.,  W. Heaps, and T.  McGee.  Geophys. Res. Lett. 3:331, 1976.

Dennis,   R. , C.  E.  Billings,  J.  A.  Record,  P.  Warneck,  P. Arin, and M.  L. Arin.  Measurements
     of  sulfur  dioxide losses  from stack plumes.  Presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the
     Air Pollution Control Association, New York City, June  1969.

Dittenhoefer,  A. C.,  and R. G.  de Pena.  A study of production and growth of sulfate particles
     in plumes from a coal-fired power plant.  Atmos. Environ. ^2:297-306, 1978.

Dovland,  H. ,  and A.  Eliassen.   Dry deposition on a snow surface.  Atmos. Environ. 10:783-785,
     1976.

Drake,  R.  L. , and S.  M.  Barrager.  Mathematical Models  for Atmospheric Pollutants. EA-1131,
     Electric Power  Research Institute,  Research Project 805,  Final  Report,  Palo Alto, CA,
     August 1979.

Draxler, R.  R.  Determination of atmospheric diffusion parameters.  Atmos. Environ.  10:99-106,
     1976.

Draxler,  R.  R.   A  Mesoscale  Transport and  Diffusion  Model.   National  Oceanic and Atmospheric
     Administration  Tech.  Memo.    ERL-ARL-64,  Air Resources  Laboratories,  Silver Spring, MD,
     1977.

Draxler,  R.  R.   Modeling the results  of  two recent mesoscale dispersion experiments.  Atmos.
     Environ.  13:1523-1533, 1979.

Eliassen, A. ,  and J.  Saltbones.   Decay  and transformation rates for  SO-,  as estimated from
     emission data,  trajectories  and measured air concentrations.  Atmos. Environ.  9:425-429,
     1975.

Eliassen, A.  The OECD study of long  range transport of air pollutants:  Long range transport
     modeling.  Atmos.  Environ.  12:479-488, 1978.

Eliassen, A.  A review of long-range  transport  modeling.   J.  Appl.  Meteor. 19:231-240, 1980.

Engelmann, R.  J.  The  Calculation of Precipitation Scavenging.   BNWL-77,  U.S.  Atomic Energy
     Commission, Battelle-Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1965.

Engelmann, R.  J.  The  Calculation of Precipitation Scavenging.   In:   Meteorology and Atomic
     Energy- 1968.   D.  H.  Slade, ed. ,  available  as  TID-24190 from  NTIS,  Springfield,  VA,
     1968.  USAEC, Division of Technical  Information, pp. 208-222.

Eriksson, E.   The yearly  circulation  of chloride and  sulfur  in nature; meteorological, geo-
     chemical  and pedological implications.  Part I.  Tellus 11:375-403, 1959.

SOX6A/D                                      6-41                                    2-3-81

-------
*
Esmen,  H.  A.,  and  M.  Corn.   Residence  time  of  particles  in  urban  air.   Atmos.  Environ.
     5:571-578, 1971.

Esmen,  N.  A.   Particle retention efficiency  of  scavenging rainfall.   Paper presented to Div.
     Water, Air & Waste Chem. ACS, Boston, 1972.

Pick, A.  Uber diffusion.  Ann. Physik Chem.  2:59-86, 1855.

Fisher,  B.  E. A.   The  long  range transport  of  sulfur  dioxide.   Atmos.  Environ. 9:1063-1070,
     1975.

Fisher,  B.  E.  A.   The calculation of  long term sulfur deposition  in  Europe.  Atmos. Environ.
     12:489-501, 1978.

Fishman, J., and P. J. Crutzen.  J. Geophys.  Res. 82:5897, 1977.

Fishman, J. ,  and  P. J. Crutzen.  The distribution  of the  hydroxyl  radical  in the troposphere.
     Colorado State University, 1978.  Atmos. Science Paper jio. 284.

Forrest, J. ,  and  L. Newman.   Further studies on the oxidation of sulfur dioxide in coal-fired
     power plant plumes.  Atmos. Environ.  11:465-474, 1977.

Forrest, J., and L. Newman.  Oxidation of  sulfur dioxide in  the Sudbury  smelter  plume.  Atmos.
     Environ. 11:517-520, 1977.

Fowler,  D. ,  and M. H. Unsworth.   Dry  deposition of sulphur  dioxide  on  wheat.   Nature, Lond.
     249:389-390, 1974.

Frenkiel,   F.   N.     Application   of  the  statistical  theory   of  turbulent  diffusion   to
     micrometeorology.  J. Met. 9:252-259. 1952.

Fritschen,  L.  J. ,  and  R.  Edmonds.   Dispersion  of fluorescent  particles into and  within  a
     Douglas  Fir  forest.   Proceedings  of the  Symposium on Atmosphere-Surface  Exchange   of
     Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants.   Richland, WA, 1976.  pp.  280-301.

Galloway, J. N., and D. M. Whelpdale.  An  atmospheric sulfur  budget for  eastern  North America.
     Atmos. Environ. 14:409-417, 1980.

Garland,  J.  A.   The  dry deposition of  sulfur  dioxide to land and water  surfaces.   Proc.   R.
     Soc. A 354:245-268,  1977.

Garland,  J.  A.    Dry  and  wet  removal  of  sulfur  from  the  atmosphere.   Atmos.  Environ.
     12:349-362, 1978.

Gartell, F,  E. ,  F.  W. Thomas,  and  S.  B.  Carpenter.  Atmos.  oxidation of  S0? in coal-burning
     power plant plumes.  Am. Ind. Hyg.  J. 24:113-120,  1963.

Gatz D.  F.   Pollutant aerosol  deposition  into  southern Lake Michigan.  Wat. Air Soil Pollut.
     5:239-251, 1975.

Gatz,  D.  F.   ,A   review  of  chemical  tracer  experiments on precipitation  systems.   Atmos.
     Environ. 11:945-954, 1977.

Georgii,  H.   W.    On the  effect  of  rainfall  on   the  sulphur dioxide  concentration  in   the
     atmosphere.   Int. J. Air Wat. Pollut. 7:1057-1059, 1963.

Gifford,  F.  A.   An Outline  of Theories of  Diffusion  in  the Lower Layers of the Atmosphere.
     In:   Meteorology and Atomic  Energy  1968.   D. Slade,  ed. ,  USAEC,  TID-24190,  1968.    pp.
     65-116.

SOX6A/D                                       6-42                                   2-3-81

-------
Gifford, F. A.   Atmospheric  dispersion models for  environmental  pollution applications.  In:
     Lectures  on  air  pollution  and  environmental  impact  analysis.    D.  Haugen,  ed. , . Am.
     Meteoro.  Soc. , 1975.   iii and 296 pp.

Gifford, F.  A.   Tropospheric  relative diffusion observations.   J.  Appl. Meteor.  16:311-313,
     1976.

Gifford, F.  A.   Tropospheric  Relative Difussion Observations.   Unpublished manuscript, File
     No. 76/10, National  Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oak Ridge, TN, 1976a.

Gifford, F.  A.   Turbulent diffusion  typing schemes:   a  review.   Nucl.  Saf.  17:68-86,  1976b.

Gillani, N. V., R.  Husar,  D.  E. Patterson, and W. E. Wilson.  Project MISTT:  kinetics of par-
     ticulate  sulfur  formation in a  power  plant out to  300  km.   Atmos.  Environ.  13:589-598,
     1978.

Colder, D.   Relations among stability parameters in the surface layer.  Boundary  Layer Meteor.
     3:47-58, 1972.

Graedel, T. E. ,  and  J.  P. Franey.  Field measurements  of  sub-micron aerosol washout by snow.
     Geophys.  Res.  Lett.  2:325-328, 1975.

Graedel, T. E. ,  and  J.  P. Franey.  Field measurements  of  sub-micron aerosol washout by rain.
     Proceedings of the Symposium on  Precipitation Scavenging.  ERDA Symp. Series  No. 41, pp.
     503-523, 1977.

Graham, R.  A.,  A.  M.  Winer,  R. Atkinson, J. N.  Pitts, Jr.  Rate constants  for the  reaction  of
     HO, with H07,  S0?,  CO, N~0, trans-2-Butene, and 2,3,Dimethyl-2-Butene  at 300 K.  J. Phys.
     Chem.  83:1563-1567,  1974^

Gravenhorst,  G., T. H.  Janssen-Schmidt, D. H. Ehhalt, and E. P. Rtith.  The  influence of  clouds
     and   rain   on   the   vertical  distributions  of  sulfur  dioxide  in  a  one-dimensional
     steady-state model.   Atmos. Environ. 12:691-698, 1978.

Grover,  S.  N. ,  H.  R.  Pruppacher, and  A.  E.  Hamielec.   A  numerical   determination  of the
     efficiency with which spherical  aerosol particles collide with spherical water drops due
     to inertial impaction and phoretic and electrical  forces.   J.  Atmos. Sci.  34:1655-1663,
     1977.

Hales, J.  M., J. M. Thorp, and M. A.  Wolf.  Field Investigation of Sulfur Dioxide Washout from
     the Plume  of  a Large Coal-fired Power Plant  by Natural  Precipitation.   APTD-0739, U.S.
     Environmental  Protection Agency,  Research Triangle Park, NC, March 1971.

Hales,  J.  M.    Fundamentals  of  the  theory  of gas  scavenging  by  rain.   Atmos.  Environ.
     6:635-659, 1972.

Hales,  J.  M. , D.  C.  Powell,  and T.   D.  Fox.    STRAM -  An air  pollution  model  incorporating
     non-linear    chemistry,    variable    trajectories,    and   plume    segment   diffusion.
     EPA-450/3-77-012,  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1977.
     147 pp.

Hales,  J.   M.   Wet  removal  of  sulfur  compounds  from  the atmosphere.   Atmos.  Environ.
     12:389-399, 1978.

Hart,  G. E.,  and D.  R.  Parent.  Chemistry of throughfall under Douglas Fir and Rocky Mountain
     Juniper.  Am.  Midi.  Nat. 92:191-201, 1974.

Haugen, D.  A.   Workshop  on micrometeorology.  American  Meteorol.  Soc.,   1973.  xi  and  392 pp.


SOX6A/D                                      6-43                                   2-3-81

-------
*
Hecht, T. A., J. H. Seinfeld, and M. C. Dodge.  Environ.  Sci. Technol. 8:327,  1974.

Heffter, J.  L.   The variation of horizontal diffusion parameters with time  for travel periods
     of one hour or longer.  J. Appl. Meteor. 4:153-156,  1965.

Heffter,  J.   L. ,  G.  J.  Ferber,  and A.  D.  Taylor.   A  regional-continental  scale  transport,
     diffusion  and deposition  model.   Natural  Oceanic   and  Atmospheric  Administration Tech.
     Memo. ERL-ARL-50.  Air Resources Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD, 1975.

Heffter,  J.  L.   Air  resources   laboratories  atmospheric  transport  and  dispersion  model
     (ARL-ATAD).   National Oceanic and  Atmospheric  Administration,  Tech.  Memo.  ERL-ARL-81.
     Air Resources Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD, 1980.

Hegg, D.  A. ,  and P. V. Hobbs.   Measurements of gas-to-particle conversion  in the  plumes  from
     five coal-fired electric power plants.  Atmos. Environ.  14:99-116, 1980.

Henmi,  T.   Long-range transport model of  S0_  and sulfate and  its  application to  the eastern
     United States.  J. Geophys. Res. 85:443F-4442, 1980.

Hicks,  B.  B.   An evaluation of precipitation scavenging  rates  of background  aerosol.  Argonne
     Nat. Lab. Radiological and Environ. Res. Div. Annual Report, 1976.

Hicks, B.  B. ,  M.  L. Wesely, and J.  L. Durham.  Critique  of methods  to measure dry  deposition.
     EPA-600/9-80-050.  September,  1980.

Hidy, G.  M. ,  P.  K. Mueller, and  E. Y.  Tong.  Spatial and  temporal  distributions  of airborne
     sulfate in parts of the United States.  Atmos. Environ.  12:735-752,  1978.

Hill, F.  B. , and  R.  F.   Adamowiez.  A  model  for rain composition  and  the washout of  sulfur
     dioxide.  Atmos. Environ. 11:917-927,  1977.

Hobbs,  P.  V.,  D.  A.  Hegg,  M.  W.  Eltgroth,  and L.  F. Radke.   Evolution of particles  in  the
     plumes  of  coal-fired  power  plants.   I.  Deductions  from field  measurements.    Atmos.
     Environ. 13: 935-951, 1979.

Huntzicker, J.  J. ,  R.  S.   Hoffman,  and  C.  S. Ling.  Continuous measurements  and  speciation of
     sulfur-containing  aerosols by  flame photometry.  Atmos.  Environ.  12:83-88, 1978.

Husar, R. B., D. E. Patterson, J. D. Husar,  N. V. Gillani, and  W. E. Wilson.   Sulfur budget of
     a power plant plume.  Atmos. Environ.  12:549-568, 1978.

Istigzer,  N.  F. ,  and D. H. Slade.   Diffusion and transport  experiments.   J_n:  Meteorology and
     Atomic Energy.  D. H. Slade, ed.  U.S.  Atomic Energy Commission,  July 1968.

Johnson, W.  B. ,  D. E.  Wolf, and  R.  L. Mancuso.   Long term regional  patterns  and  transfrontier
     exchanges  of  airborne  sulfur pollution  in  Europe.  Atmos.  Environ.  12:511-527,  1978.

Junge,  C.  E.   The  cycle  of  atmospheric trace  gases  -  natural  and manmade.  Quart.  J.  Roy.
     Meteorol. Soc. 98:711-729, 1972.

Junge,  C.  E.   Residence time and variability of  tropospheric trace  gases.   Tellus  26:477-488,
     1974.

Kalkstein, M. I., et al.   Natural aerosols  and  nuclear debris studies.  AFCRC-TN-59-627, 1959.

Klepper,  B. ,  and  D.  K. Craig.   Deposition of  airborne particulates onto plant  leaves.   J.
     Envir. Quality 4:495-499, 1975.
SOX6A/D                                       6-44                                    2-3-81

-------
Knutson, E. 0. ,  and  J.  D.  Stockham.  Aerosol  scavenging by snow:  comparison of single-flake
     and entire-snowfall  results.   In:    Precipitation  Scavenging  (1974),  Proceedings  of a
     Symposium,  Illinois  State  Water Survey  and U.S.  Atomic Energy  Commission,  Champaign,
     Illinois, October  14-18,  1974.  R.  G.  Semonin  and R.  W.  Beadle,  eds.,  ERDA Symposium
     Series 41,  Energy  Research  and Development Administration, Oak Ridge, TN, June 1979. pp.
     195-207.

Krey,  P.   W. ,  and  L.  E.   Toonkel.   Scavenging   Ratios.   Proceedings  of  the  Symposium  on
     Precipitation Scavenging.   ERDA Symp. Series 41, pp. 61-70, 1977.

Lange,  R.   ADPIC -  A  three-dementional  transport-diffusion model for  the  dispersal  of atmo-
     spheric pollutants and  its  validation against regional tracer studies.  J. Appl. Meteor.
     17:320-329,  1978.

Lavery, T.  F. ,  R. L.  Baskett, J.  W.  Thrasher,  N.  J.   Lordi ,  A.  C.  Lloyd,  and G.  M.  Hidy.
     Development and  validation  of  a regional  model  to simulate atmospheric concentrations of
     sulfur  dioxide   and  sulfate.    In:   Proceedings  of  the  Second  Joint  Conference  on
     Applications of  Air Pollution Meteorology.  American Meteorological Society, March 24-27,
     1980,  New Orleans, LA,  pp. 236-247.

Leighton, P. A.  Photochemistry of Air Pollution.   Academic Press, New York, 1961.

Levy, H, II.  Science 173:141,  1971.

Liss,  P.  S. ,  and P.  G. Slate.   Flux of  gases  across the air-sea  interface.   Nature, Lond.
     247:181-184, 1974.

Little, P.   Deposition  of  2.75,  5.0 and  8.5 mm  particles to plant and soil surfaces.  Envir.
     Pollut. 12:293-305, 1977.

Little, P.  , and  R. D. Wiffen.   Emission and deposition of petrol engine exhaust Pb--I Deposi-
     tion of exhaust  Pb to plant and soil surfaces.  Atmos.  Environ.  11:437-447, 1977.

Liu, M. K.  and D.  Durran.   The development of a regional air pollution model and its applica-
     tion  to  the northern  Great  Plains.  EPA-908/1-77-001.   Systems  Applications, Inc., San
     Rafael, CA,  1977.

Lusis,  M.  A., and H.  A.  Wiebe.   The rate of oxidation  of sulfur dioxide  in  the  plume of a
     nickel smelter stock.   Atmos. Environ. 10:793-798, 1976.

Lusis,  M.  A., K. G.  Anlauf,  L.  A.  Barrie, and  H.  A.  Wiebe.  Plume  chemistry  studies at a
     northern Alberta power plant.  Atmos. Environ. 12:2429-2438, 1978.

Lyons, W.  A.,  and R.  B. Husar.  SMS/GOES visible images detect a synoptic-scale air pollution
     episode.   Mon.  Weather Rev.  104:1623-1626, 1976.

MacCracken, M.  C.   MAP3S:   an investigation  of atmospheric energy  related pollutants in the
     northeastern United States.   Atmos.  Environ.  12:649-659,  1978.

Makhon'ko,  K.  P.  Determination  of  capture coefficient  of  radioactive dust by rain.  Isv. AN
     SSSR,  Ser. Geophys. 11:1709, 1964.

Makhon'ko,  K.  P., and G.  V. Dmitrieva.   Capability of various types of precipitation for wash
     out of fission   products  from  the  atmosphere and  characteristics of washout.   Isv.  AN
     SSSR,  Ser. Phys.  Atm.  I. Okeana 3:508, 1966.

Makhon'ko,  K.  P.  Simplified theoretical motion of  contaminant  removal by precipitation from
     the atmosphere.   Tellus 19:467-476,  1967.


SOX6A/D                                      6-45                                   2-3-81

-------
Mamane,  Y. ,  and R.  F.  Pueschel.   Formation  of  sulfate  particles in  the  plume of  the Four
     Corners Power Plant.  J. Appl. Meteorol.  19:779-790, 1980.

Mancuso,  R.  L. , C.  M.  Bhumralkar,  D.  E.  Wolf,  and W.  B.  Johnson.    The  exchange of sulfur
     pollution  between  the  various  countries  of Europe based on  the  EURMAP model.  Preprint
     Volume.  Third  Symposium on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion and Air Quality.  Raleigh,
     NC, 1979. p 345-354.

McMahon, T.  A.,  P.  J.  Denison,  and R. Fleming.  A long-distance air pollutant transport model
     incorporating washout and dry deposition  components.   Atmos.  Environ.  10:751-761, 1976.

McMahon,  T.  A. ,   and   P.  J.  Denison.   Review   Paper - empirical   atmospheric  deposition
     parameters - a survey.  Atmos. Environ. ^3:571-585, 1979.

McNaughton,  D.  J.   Initial comparision of SURE/MAP3S sulfur oxide observations with long-term
     regional model predictions.  Atmos. Environ. 14:55-63, 1980.

Meagher, J.  F., L.  Stockburger,  E. M. Bailey, and 0. Huff.  The oxidation of sulfur dioxide to
     sulfate aerosols in the plume of a coal-fired power plant.  Atmos. Environ. 12:2197-2204,
     1978.

Meyers,  R.  E. ,  R.  T. Cederwall, and  W.  D.  Ohmstede.  Modeling Regional Atmospheric Transport
     and  Diffusion:   Some  Environmental Applications.   In:  Advances  in Environmental   Science
     and Engineering.  J.  R. Pfafflin and E. Ziegler, eds. , New York, Gordon and Breach, 1979.

Meyers,  R.  E. ,  R.  T. Cederwall, J. A. Storch,  and L. I. Kleinman.  Modeling sulfur oxide con-
     centrations in  the  eastern United States:   model  sensitivity,  verification and applica-
     tions.  Preprints, Fourth Symposium on Turbulence, Diffusion, and  Air Pollution, American
     Meteorological Society, Reno, NV, January  16-18, 1979a.  pp 673-676.

Middleton,  P.,   C.   S.   Kiang,   and  V.   A.  Mohnen.   Theoretical  estimates  of  the  relative
     importance  of  various  urban sulfate  aerosol   production  mechanisms.   Atmos.  Environ.
     14:463-472, 1980.

Moller,  U. ,  and G.  Schumann.  Mechanisms of transport from the atmosphere to the earth's sur-
     face.   J. Geophys.  Res. 75:3013-3019, 1970.

Moller,  D.    Kinetic  model  of  atmospheric  SCL  oxidation  based  on  published  data.   Atmos.
     Environ. 14:1067-1076,  1980.              i

Monin, A.  S. ,  and  A. M. Yaglom.   Statistical Fluid  Mechanics.  MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Vol.
     1,  1971.  xii and 769 pp.

Morris,  C.  S. ,  C.  W. Benkley,  and A. Bass.  Development of  mesoscale air quality simulation
     models. Vol. 4.  User's guide to MESOGRID  (mesoscale grid) model.  EPA-600/7-79-XXX, U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Research  Triangle  Park, NC,  1979.  118 p.

Neuberger,  H. ,  C.  L.   Hosier,   and  W.   C.  Kocmond.   Vegetation  as  an  aerosols  filter.   In:
     Biometeorology,  Proceedings  of  the  3rd   International  Biometeor. Congress,  1967.   pp.
     693-702.

Newman,  L. ,  J.  Forrest,  and B.  Manowitz.   The application of an  isotope ratio technique to  a
     study of the atmospheric oxidation of sulfur dioxide in  the plume  from  a coal-fired power
     plant.  Atmos. Environ. 9:969-977, 1975.

Newman,  L.    Atmospheric  Oxidation  of Sulfur Dioxide.   J_n:   Atmospheric  Sulfur Deposition
     Environmental  Impact  and Health Effect.    Shriner,  Richmond and Lindberg,  eds., Ann Arbor
     Science, 1980.


SOX6A/D                                      6-46                                   2-3-81

-------
Niki, H.,  E.  E.  Daly, and B. Weinstock.  Adv. Chem. Ser. 113:16, 1972.

Nord«J, J.   Long-range  transport of air pollutants in Europe and acid precipitation  in Norway.
     Water, Air Soil Pollut. 6:199-217, 1976.

Obukhov,  A. M.   On  the distribution of energy  in the spectrum of turbulent  flow.   Izv. Akad.
     Nauk SSSR Ser.  Geogr. Geofiz. 5:453,  1941.

Orel  A.  E. ,  and  J.  H. Seinfeld.   Nitrate formation in  atmospheric  aerosols.   Environ. Sci.
     Technol.  11:1000-1007, 1977.

Ottar, B.   An  assessment  of the OECD study on long-range transport of air pollutants (LRTAP).
     Atmos. Environ. 12:445-454, 1978.

Pack, D.  H. ,  G.  J.  Ferber, J.  L.  Heffter,  K.  Telegades, J.  K.  Angell ,  W.  H. Hoecker,  and  L.
     Machta.   Meteorology of long-term transport.  Atmos. Environ. 12:425-444, 1978.

Pasquill,   F.    Atmospheric Diffusion.   2nd  Ed.    John  Wiley and  Sons,  1974.   xi  and 429 pp.

Pasquill,   F.    The dispersion of materials  in  the atmospheric boundary layer -  the basis for
     generalization.   I_n:   Lectures on air pollution and  environmental  impact analysis.    D.
     Haugen,  ed., Am. Meteoro. Soc., 1975.  iii and 296 pp.

Pasquill,  F.   Atmospheric dispersion parameters in Gaussian plume modelling.  Part 2, Possible
     requirements   for  change   in  the  Turner  workbook  values.   EPA-600/4-76-030b,  Env.
     Monitoring Ser., 1976.

Pasquill,   F.    The   estimation   of the  despersion  of  windborne  material.   Meteorol.  Mag.
     90:33-49, 1961.

Pendergast, M. M.   Model  evaluation for travel distances 30-140 km.  Preprint volume.   Fourth
     Symposium on Turbulence, Diffusion,  and  Air Pollution.  January  15-19, 1979, Reno, NV,
     1979.   pp.  648-651.

Perhac, R.  M.   Sulfate regional  experiment in northeastern United States:   The "SURE" program.
     Atmos. Environ. 12:641-647, 1978.

Perkins,  R. W. ,  C.  W.  Thomas, and J.  A.  Young.   Application of short-lived  cosmogenic  radio-
     nuclides  as  traces  of  in-cloud  scavenging  processes.   J.  Geophys.  Res.  75:3076-3087,
     1970.

Perner, D., D.  H.  Ehhalt,  H. W.  Patz, U. Platt, E. P. Roth, and A. Voltz.   Geophys.  Res. Lett.
     3:466, 1976.

Peterson,   K.   R. ,  and  T.  Y.  Crawford.   Precipitation scavenging  in a range cloud diffusion
     code.    Proceedings of  the  Symposium  Precipitation Scavenging.   USAEC,  Symp.  Ser.  22,
     1970.   pp.425-431

Pierson,  D. H. ,  P.  A.  Cawse, L. Salmon, and R.  S. Cambray.   Trace elements in the atmospheric
     environment.   Nature, Lond. 241:252-256, 1973.

Postma, A.   K.    Effect  of  Solubilities  of Gases  on  their Scavenging  by  Raindrops.  _In:
     Precipitation  Scavenging.   DOE  Div.  Tech.  Info., Oak  Ridge,  Tennessee,  1970.  Available
     as CONF-700601 from NTIS, Springfield, VA.

Prahm, L.  P., U.  Torp, and R. M. Stern.  Deposition and transformation rates  of  sulphur  oxides
     during atmospheric transport over the Atlantic.   Tellus 28:355-372, 1976.
SOX6A/D                                      6-47                                    2-3-81

-------
Prahm, L.  P.,  and 0.  Chn'stensen.  Long-range transmission of pollutants simulated by the 2-D
     pseudospectral dispersion model.   J. Appl. Meteor. 16:896-910, 1977.

Pueschel  R.  V.,  and C.  C. Van Valin.   Cloud nucleus formation in a power plant plume.  Atmos.
     Environ. 12:307-312 1978.

Radke, L.  F. ,  E.  E. Hindman, II, and P. V. Hobbs.  A case study of plume scavenging by a rain
     shower.  In:   Precipitation Scavenging (1974), Proceedings of a Symposium, Illinois State
     Water Survey and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Champaign, Illinois, October 14-18, 1974.
     R.   G.   Semonin and R.  W.  Beadle,  eds.,  ERDA Symposium  Series  41, Energy  Research and
     Development Administration, Oak Ridge, TN, June 1977, pp. 425-436.

Radke,  L.   F. ,  P.  V.   Hobbs,   and M.  W.  Eltgroth.   Scavenging  of  aerosol  particles  by
     precipitation.  J.  Appl. Metero.  19:715-722, 1980.

Rao, K.   S. ,  J.  S.   Lague,  and B.  A.  Egan.   An air  trajectory model  for regional transport of
     atmospheric sulfates.   Preprint Volume, Third Symposium on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffu-
     sion and Air Quality.   American Meteorological Society, October 19-22, 1976, Raleigh, NC,
     1976.   pp.  325-331.

Rasmussen,   K.  H.,  M. Taheri,  and  R.  L.  Kabel.   Global  emissions  and  natural  processes for
     removal of gaseous pollutants.  Water, Air and Soil Pollut. 4:33-64, 1975.

Richardson, L.  F.   Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph.  Proc. Roy. Soc.
     (London) A, 104:640-654, 1926.

Roberts,  P.  T. , and  S.  K.  Friedlander.   Conversion  of SO- to sulfur particulate  in the Los
     Angeles atmosphere.   Environ. Health Perspect. 10:103-108, 1975.

Roberts,  D.  B. ,  and D.  J. Williams.   The  kinetics of oxidation of  sulfur  dioxide within the
     plume  from a  sulphide  smelter in a remote  region.   Atmos.  Environ.  13:1485-1499, 1979.

Robinson,  E. , and  R.  C. Robbins.  Gaseous nitrogen compound pollutants  from urban  and natural
     sources.  J. Air Poll.  Control Assoc. 20:303-306, 1970.

Rodhe, H.    A  study of  the  sulfur budget  for the  atmosphere over northern  Europe.   Tell us
     24:128-138, 1972.

Rodhe, H. ,  and  J.  Grandell.   On  the  removal  time of aerosol  particles  from the atmosphere by
     precipitation  scavenging.  Tellus 24:442, 1972.

Rodhe, H. ,  C.  Persson,  and  0. Akesson.   An  investigation into regional transport  of soot and
     sulfate aerosols.  Atmos. Environ.  6:675-693, 1972.

Rodhe, H.    Budgets and  turn-over times  of  atmospheric  sulfur  compounds.   Atmos.  Environ.
     12:671-680, 1978.

Schiermeier,  F.  A.,  W.  E.  Wilson,  F.   Pooler,  J.  K.  S.  Ching,  and J.   F.  Clarke.   Sulfur
     Transport  and  Transformation in  the  Environment  (STATE):   A  Major EPA Research Program.
     Bulletin AMS.  60:1303-1312, 1979.

Scott, W.  D. ,   and  P.  V.  Hobbs.   The  formation  of sulfate  in water drops.   J.   Atmos. Sci.
     24:24-27, 1967.

Scott,  B.   C.    Parameterization  of   sulfate  removal  by  precipitation.    J.  Appl.  Meteor.
     17:1375-1389,  1978.

Scriven,  R.  A. ,  and B.  E. A.  Fisher.   The long  range  transport  of airborne  material and its
     removal by deposition and washout.  Atmos. Environ. 9:49-68,  1975.

SOX6A/D                                      6-48                                  2-3-81

-------
Sehmel,  G. A.   Particle  eddy diffusivities and deposition  velocities  for isothermal flow and
     smooth surfaces.   J. Aerosol Sci.  4:125-138,  1973.

Sehmel,  G. A.,  and  S.  L. Sutter.  Particle  deposition rates on a water surface as a function
     of particle diameter and air velocity.  J.  de Rech. Atmos.  8:911-920, 1974.

Sehmel,  G. A.   Particle and gas dry deposition:   a review.   Atmos.  Environ. 14:983-1011, 1980.

Semonin,  R.  G. , and  R.  W.   Beadle,  eds.   Precipitation Scavenging  (1974).   Proceedings of a
     Symposium,   Illinois- State  Water  Survey  and U.S.  Atomic  Energy  Commission,  Champaign,
     Illinois, October 14-18, 1974.   ERDA Symposium Series 41, Energy Research and Development
     Administration, Oak Ridge, TN,  June 1977.

Shannon,  J.   D.    The   advanced   statistical   trajectory   regional   air  pollution  model.
     ANL/RER-79-1,  Argonne National  Laboratory,  Argonne, IL, 1979.

Sheih,  C.  M.   Application  for  a  statistical  trajectory  model to  the simulation  of  sulfur
     pollution over northeastern United States.   Atmos. Environ. 11:173-178, 1977.

Sheih, C. M. , G.  D.  Hess, and B. B.  Hicks.   Design of network experiments for regional-scale
     atmospheric pollutant transport and  transformation.   Atmos.  Environ.  12:1745-1753, 1978.

Sheih, C. M. , M.  L.  Wesely,  and B.  B.  Hicks.   Estimated dry deposition  velocities  of sulfur
     over the  eastern United  States  and  surrounding  regions.  Atmos.  Environ.  13:1361-1368,
     1979.

Shirvaikar, V.  V.  et  al.  A study of washout of radioactive fallout and particulate matter in
     individual  rain showers.  AEET/AM/10 (India), 1960.

Singh, H. B.   Geophys Res. Lett.  4:101, 1977.

Sisterson, D.  L. ,  and  P.  Trenzen.   Nocturnal  boundary-layer wind maxima  and  the  problem of
     wind power assessment.   Environ.  Sci. Technol. 12:218-221,  1978.

SI inn, W. G.  N.   Dry deposition and resuspension of aerosol particles --a new look at some old
     problems.  In:   Atmosphere-Surface Exchange of Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants (1974).
     Proceedings of a  Symposium,  Battelle  Pacific  Northwest  Laboratories  and U.S.  Atomic
     Energy Commission,  Richland, Washington,  September 4-6, 1974.  R. J.  Engelmann and G. A.
     Sehmel,  eds.,  ERDA  Symposium  Series  38, Energy  Research and  Development Administration,
     Oak Ridge,  TN, January 1976, pp.  1-40.

SI inn, W. G.  N.   Some approximations for  the wet and dry removal of particles and gases from
     the atmosphere.  Water,  Air, and Soil Pollution 7:513-543,  1977.

Slinn, W. G.  N. ,  et al.  Some aspects  of the transfer of atmospheric trace constituents past
     the air-sea interface.   Atmos.Environ. 12:2055-2087, 1978.

Slinn, W. G.  N.   Precipitation Scavenging.  Chapter 11 of Atmospheric Sciences and Power Pro-
     duction- 1981.   D. Randerson, ed.,  U.S. Department of Energy,  Washington, DC.  Preprint to
     be published 1981.

Small, W. G.  N.   Wet and dry  deposition  of  fallout materials at Kjeller.   TeTlus 12:308-314,
     1960.

Smith, F. B.  A scheme for  estimating the vertical  dispersion  of a plume from a source near
     ground level.   In:  Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the expert Panel on Air Pollution
     Modelling,  NATO-CCMS Report No.  14, Brussels, 1972.
SOX6A/D                                      6-49                                   2-3-81

-------
Smith, F.  B. ,  and R.  D. Hunt.  Meteorological aspects of the transport of pollution over long
     distances.  Atmos. Environ. 12:461-477, 1978.

Spedding,  D.  J.   Sulphur  dioxide  absorption by  sea water.   Atmos.  Environ.  6:583-586, 1972.

Start,  G.   E. , and  L.  L.  Wendell.   Regional   effluent  dispersion  calculations  considering
     spatial  and  temporal  meteorological  variations.   National  Oceanic  and  Atmospheric
     Administration. Tech. Memo. ERL-ARL-44, Idaho Falls, ID, 1974.

Stelson A.  W. ,  S.  K.  Friedlander, and J. H. Seinfeld.  A note on the equilibrium relationship
     between  ammonia  and  nitric   acid  and  particulate ammonium  nitrate.    Atmos.  Environ.
     13:369-371, 1979.

Stephens,  W.  T.   and  R.  0.  McCaldin.   Attenuation  of  power station  plumes  as determined by
     instrumental aircraft.   Environ. Sci. Technol. 5:615-621 1971.

Stewart, R. W., S. Hameed, and J. P. Pinto.  J.  Geophys. Res. 82:3134, 1977.

Strom, G. H.  Transport and Diffusion of Stack Effluents.  lr\:  Air Pollution.  Third Edition.
     Volume  I:   Air  Pollutants,   Their  Transformation  and  Transport.   A.  C.   Stern,  ed. ,
     Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1976.   pp. 401-501.

Su,  F. ,  J.  G.  Calvert,  and J.  H. Shaw.   A FT-IR  spectroscopic  study  of  the  ozone-ethene
     reaction mechanism in Op-rich mixtures.  J.  Phys. Chem. 84:239-246, 1980.

Sutton,  D.  G.   A  theory of  eddy  diffusion  in  the  atmosphere.   Proc.  Royal  Soc.   London.
     A135:143. 1932.

Sykes,  R.  I., and  L.  Hatton.   Computation of  horizontal  trajectories based  on  the  surface
     geostrophic wind.  Atmos. Environ. 10:925-934, 1976.

Tang,  I.  N.   On  the  equilibrium  partial  pressures  of   nitric  acid  and  ammonia  in  the
     atmosphere.   Atmos. Environ., 1980.

Taylor,  G.  I.   Diffusion by continuous movements.   Proc.  London Math. Soc.  20:196-212, 1921.

Turner,  D.  B.   Workbook  of  Atmospheric  Dispersion  Estimates,  Office   of  Air  Programs
     Publication  No.  AP-26.   United States Environmental Protection Agency,  Research Triangle
     Park, NC, 1970.

Turner,  D.  B.  Atmospheric  dispersion modeling - a critical  review.   J.  Air. Poll.  Control
     Assoc. 29:502-519, 1979.

Ursenbach,  W.  0., A.  C. Hill, W. H. Edwards, and S. M.  Kunen.  Conversion rate of SO,  to sub-
     micron  sulfate in the plumes  of  a coal-fired power plant  in  the western Unitea  States.
     Presented  at  70th  Annual  Meeting of  the  Air Pollution  Control  Association, Toronto,
     Canada, June 20-24,  1977.

Volchuk,  H.  L. ,  V.  T. Bowen,  T.  R.  Folsom,  W. S.  Broecker, E. A.  Schuert, and  G. S. Bien.
     Oceanic distribution of  radionuclides  from  nuclear  explosions.   In:   Radioactivity in  the
     Marine Environment.  National Academy  of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1971.

Wang,  P.  K. ,  S.  N. Grover  and H.  R.  Pruppacher.  On the  effect  of electric charges on  the
     scavenging   of  aerosol  particles  by  clouds  and  small   raindrops.    J.  Atmos.  Sci.
     35:1735-1743,  1978.

Weber,  E.   Contribution to the  residence  time  of sulfur dioxide  in  a  polluted atmosphere.  J.
     Geophys.  Res.  75:2909-2915, 1970.


SOX6A/D                                      6-50                                   2-3-81

-------
*
Weber, A.  H.   Atmospheric dispersion parameters of Gaussian plume modelling.  Part  1.  Review
     of  current  systems and possible future  developments.  EPA-600/4-76-030a, Env.  Monitoring
     Ser.,  1976.

Wedding, J.  B. ,  R.  W.  Carlson, J.  J.  Stuker, and F.  A.  Bazzaz.   Aerosol deposition on plant
     leaves.   Proceedings of  the  1st International  Symposium on Acid  Precipitation and the
     Forest Ecosystem.   USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rpt. NE-23, 1976.  pp. 897-903.

Wesley,  M.  L. ,   B.  B.   Hicks,  W.   P.  Dannevick,  S.  Frissela,  and  R.  B.  Husar.   An  eddy
     correlation  measurement of particulate  deposition  from  the  atmosphere.  Atmos. Environ.
     11:561-563, 1977.

Whelpdale,  D.  M. ,  and  R.  W. Shaw.   Sulphur dioxide removal by turbulent transfer  over grass,
     snow and water surfaces.  Tell us 26:195-204, 1974.

White, E. ,  and F.  Turner.  A  method  of  estimating income  of  nutrients in a  catch  of airborne
     particles by a woodland canopy.  J.  Appl. Ecol. 7:441-461, 1970.

Wofsy, S. C., J.  C. McConnell, and M. B.  McElroy.   J. Geophys. Res. 77:4477, 1972.

Wolf,   M.   A.,   and   M.   T.   Dana.    Experimental   studies   on  precipitation   scavenging.
     Battelle-Northwest  Annual Report.   USAEC  Report  BNWL-1051  (Pt.  1),  1969.   pp.  18-25.

Yaglom, A.  M.  Equations  with  time-dependent  coefficients describing diffusion in a  stationary
     atmospheric  surface  layer.  Atmos.  and  Oceanic Physics,  Acad.  of Sci.,  U.S.S.R.  11:
     704-708, 1975 (translated ed.).
SOX6A/D                                      6-51                                    2-3-81

-------