„ . ...                                       FINAL DRAFT
      United States                                     er«n nu
      Environmental Protection                               tlAU-CIN-
      Agency                                        Hay, 1988
      Research and
      Development
       HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
       FOR 1.2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE
      Prepared for
       OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
       EMERGENCY RESPONSE
      Prepared by
      Environmental Criteria and  Assessment Office
      Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
      U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency
      Cincinnati,  OH  45268
                  DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE


                          NOTICE

   This document Is a preliminary draft.  It has not been formally released
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and should not at this stage be
construed  to represent Agency policy.  It Is being circulated for comments
on Us technical accuracy and policy Implications.

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  Is  an external draft  for  review purposes only and  does  not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention  of  trade names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE
    Health and  Environmental  Effects  Documents  (HEEDs) are prepared  for  the
Office of  Solid  Waste  and Emergency Response (OSWER).  This  document  series
Is Intended to support listings under  the  Resource  Conservation  and  Recovery
Act  (RCRA) as  well  as to  provide  health-related  limits and  goals for  emer-
gency and  remedial  actions under  the Comprehensive  Environmental Response,
Compensation  and Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   Both   published  literature  and
Information obtained  for  Agency Program Office files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to potential human health, aquatic  life and environmental  effects  of
hazardous  waste  constituents.   The  literature searched for 1n this  document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included 1n  "Appendix: Literature  Searched."
Literature search material  Is  current up  to 8  months previous  to the  final
draft date listed  on  the front  cover.   Final draft document  dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document Is sent to  the  Program Officer (OSWER).

    Several quantitative  estimates are  presented  provided  sufficient  data
are available.   For systemic toxicants,  these Include Reference  doses  (RfOs)
for  chronic   and subchronlc  exposures  for  both   the  Inhalation and  oral
exposures.  The  subchronlc or  partial  lifetime  RfD, 1s  an  estimate of  an
exposure  level   that  would not  be expected  to cause  adverse  effects  when
exposure occurs  during a  limited  time  Interval  I.e.,  for an Interval  that
does  not  constitute a  significant portion  of  the  Hfespan.  This  type  of
exposure estimate  has  not been  extensively used,  or rigorously defined  as
previous risk assessment efforts have  focused primarily on lifetime  exposure
scenarios.   Animal  data   used  for  subchronlc  estimates  generally   reflect
exposure  durations  of 30-90  days.   The  general  methodology  for  estimating
subchronlc RfDs  1s  the same as  traditionally  employed for  chronic -estimates,
except that subchronlc data are utilized  when available.

    In the case  of  suspected  carcinogens,  RfOs  are  not estimated.   Instead,
a  carcinogenic  potency   factor,  or   q-|*   (U.S.  EPA,  1980b)  Is  provided.
These potency  estimates  are  derived for  both  oral  and Inhalation exposures
where possible.  In addition, unit risk  estimates for air  and drinking  water
are presented based on Inhalation and  oral  data, respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs)  based  on both chronic toxlclty  and  cardno-
genldty  are   derived.   The  RQ  1s  used   to  determine  the   quantity  of  a
hazardous  substance for  which  notification  1s  required   In  the event of  a
release as specified under the  Comprehensive  Environmental Response,  Compen-
sation  and Liability  Act (CERCLA).   These  two  RQs  (chronic  toxlclty  and
cardnogenlcHy) represent  two of six scores  developed (the  remaining  four
reflect  1gn1tab1lHy,  reactivity,  aquatic  toxlclty,  and  acute mammalian
toxlclty).  Chemical-specific  RQs  reflect  the  lowest  of  these  six  primary
criteria.  The  methodology for  chronic  toxldty  and cancer  based  RQs  are
defined In U.S. EPA. 1984 and 1986a,  respectively.
                                      111

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  1s  a   solid   at  ambient  temperatures;   It   Is
Insoluble  In  water  but  highly  soluble  1n ethanol  (Heast,   1985).   It  1s
unstable  In  both  air  and  water  under  normal  conditions  (U.S.  EPA,  1981;
R1gg1n and Howard. 1979).  1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne 1s  commonly produced  by  the
reduction  of  nitrobenzene with  zinc dust  1n  alkaline  solution  (U.S.  EPA.
1981). In  1977.  one company  In  the United  States  produced between 0.1  and
1.0 million pounds of this chemical.  Because of Us adverse health effects,
the  production   of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne   1n  the  United  States  has  been
greatly  reduced  In recent years  (U.S.  EPA, 1981).   Data  regarding  current
producers  or  production  volumes  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne   1n  the  United
States were  not  available (USITC,  1986;  SRI, 1987).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne
Is  used  primarily  In  the production  of   benz1d1ne-based  dyes  and  1n  the
manufacture  of   such  Pharmaceuticals  as  sulfInpyrazone  and  phenylbutazone
(U.S. EPA,  1981).
    Limited data  were available  1n the  literature regarding  the  fate  and
transport  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  In  any  environmental  media.   In  air,
direct photolysis, oxidation  by  molecular   oxygen and  reaction with HO*  are
expected  to  convert  !,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne   Into azobenzene.   The  half-life
for  the  conversion of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne to azobenzene by photochemically
produced H0>  1s  estimated to be  -7  hours   (U.S. EPA,  19B6b).   The  fate  and
transport  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  In  the atmosphere   will  be controlled
Indirectly by  Us oxidation  product  azobenzene.   Photolysis,   reaction  with
molecular  oxygen  and  blodegradatlon  may   be  responsible  for the  loss  of
!,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne from water  (Callahan  et  al.,   1979).  The half-life of
                                      1v

-------
!,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  clean water  may be  7 hours  and In wastewater  15
minutes  (Rlggln and  Howard,  1979);  however,  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  may not  be
degraded  In  water but  may  be  converted  Into  azobenzene (Callahan  et  al.,
1979).   As  In the case  of air,  the  fate of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  in  water
will be  controlled by azobenzene, which  may  undergo  further  degradation Into
aniline  and  other  products  (Callahan  et  al.,  1979).  Similarly,  the trans-
port  of  !,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  water  will  be controlled by  azobenzene
formed  as  a  result  of  oxidation  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.    In  soils,
1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne will  undergo  rapid oxidation  In  the  presence  of  0_
and  certain  metal cations;  It may  undergo both  aerobic (primarily  1n  top
layers)  and  anaerobic  (In  deeper  soil  layers)  blodegradatlon.  1,2-D1phenyl-
hydrazlne  and  particularly  Its   oxidation  product  (azobenzene)  will   be
moderately to strongly adsorbed  In soils  and are  not  likely  to  leach  to
groundwater from most soils.
    Aquatic,  toxlclty  Information  for  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1s   limited  to
acute lethality data for two  freshwater  animal  species.   These data Indicate
that  the  no-d1scern1ble-effect  concentration  for   Daphnla  magna   Is  0.41
mg/i.  that  24-hour  LC5Qs  for  Lepomls  macrochlrus  and  Daphnla  magna  are
1.2  and  8.1  mg/a,  respectively,  and   that  96-hour   LC   s  for  Lepomls
macrochlrus and Daphnla magna are  0.27  and 4.1  mg/a,  respectively.
    Limited  pharmacoklnetlc  data  for  rats  Indicate  that 1,2-dlphenylhydra-
zlne Is  absorbed by  the gastrointestinal  and respiratory tracts  and excreted
as  unchanged compound and  metabolites  In  the  urine.   Specific  Information
regarding  the rate and  extent  of absorption  or  excretion,  other  excretory
pathways  or  distribution of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1s  not available.  Identi-
fied urinary metabolites 1n rats Include aniline,  benzldlne and amlnophenols.

-------
    Limited  toxlclty  data  are available  for  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne.   Four-
week  feeding  studies  conducted by the NCI (1978)  showed  that  diets  contain-
ing >0.108 and  0.301% of compound produced deaths  1n  rats  and mice,  respec-
tively.  Intestinal hemorrhage  In mice at  unspecified  concentrations  was  the
only  gross  pathologic   effect  attributed  to  treatment.    In  chronic  oral
studies, rats and  mice were given  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  In the diet  for  78
weeks  at  concentrations of  0.008  or  0.03%  (male  rats),  0.004  or  0.01%
(female  rats).  0.008  or 0.04%  (male  mice) and 0.004 or 0.04% (female mice)
(NCI,  1978).  Effects Included decreased  body  weight  gain  In  the  high-dose
male and low- and  high-dose  female  rats,  decreased survival  In the  high-dose
female  rats,  and  decreased  body weight  and  decreased survival  In  the high-
dose male  and female  mice.   NCI  (1978)  concluded that there  were  no treat-
ment-related  nonneoplastlc   gross  or  hlstologlcal  alterations  In   either
species.
    Treatment-related  neoplastlc  effects  occurred  In  the  NCI  (1978)  study,
Including  hepatocellular carcinomas  In   the  low-  and  high-dose male  rats,
squamous-cell carcinomas  and paplllomas  of  the Zymbal's  gland  In  high-dose
male  rats,  adrenal   pheochromocytomas  In  high-dose male  rats,  neoplastlc
nodules  In  the  liver  and mammary  gland  adenocarclnomas In  high-dose female
rats,  and  hepatocellular carcinomas  In high-dose  female mice.   Also,  1,2-dl-
phenylhydrazlne  was  tumorlgenlc  In  rats   and  mice In  Inadequately  reported
chronic  oral, subcutaneous and  dermal cardnogenlcHy  studies  (PUss, 1974),
and produced  positive responses  In  a Strain  A mouse pulmonary tumor  assay
(Maronpot  et al., 1986).  1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  was   not  tumorlgenlc  when
administered  to rats  by subcutaneous Injection once weekly for life (Spitz
et al.,  1950).
                                      v1

-------
    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne Induced reverse mutations  In  §_._ typhlmurlum strain
TA100  but  not  In  other strains  of  S...  typhlmurlum  or  1n  E_^ coll WP2  uvrA
(Haworth et  al.,  1983;  Dunkel  et al.,  1985).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  Inhib-
ited thymldlne  Incorporation  Into mouse testlcular ONA when  administered  by
a  single  IntraperHoneal   Injection   (Seller,   1977),  but  did  not   Induce
sex-linked recessive  lethal mutations  1n Drosophlla melanoqaster (Yoon  et
al.. 1985).
    Information Is  not available regarding  the toxlclty  or  carclnogenldty
of  Inhaled 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne, or   teratogenlclty or   other  reproductive
effects of !,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne by the oral  or  Inhalation routes.
    Using  the  dose-response  data  for  hepatocellular  carcinoma  and  liver
neoplastlc  nodules  In  male   rats  from  the   NCI   (1978)   carclnogenldty
bloassay,  a  q * of  0.8 (mg/kg/day)'1  was  calculated  for oral exposure  to
1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne   (U.S.  EPA,   1980a).    This  q^   was   verified   and
adopted  as  the  Inhalation  q-j*   (U.S.  EPA,   1987b).   An  RQ  of  100   for
systemic toxlclty was  calculated  on  the basis  of  decreased  survival  of  rats
In the  NCI  (1978)  bloassay.   An RQ of  10 for carclnogenldty was  calculated
from the NCI (1978) male rat liver tumor/nodule  Incidence  data.
                                      vll

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	     1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	     1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	     1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	     2
    1.4.   USE DATA	     2
    1.5.   SUMMARY	     3

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	     4

    2.1.   AIR	     4
    2.2.   WATER	     4
    2.3.   SOIL	     7
    2.4.   SUMMARY	     7

3.  EXPOSURE	     9

4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	    10

    4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY .  .  •	    10
    4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS	    10
    4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS	    10
    4.4.   SUMMARY	    10

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	:	    11

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	    11
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	    11
    5.3.   METABOLISM	    11
    5.4.   EXCRETION	    12
    5.5.   SUMMARY	    12

6.  EFFECTS	    13

    6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	    13

           6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures	    13
           6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	    13
           6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	    14

    6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	    14

           6.2.1.   Inhalation	    14
           6.2.2.   Oral	    14
           6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	    18

    6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	    19
    6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	    20
    6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS 	    20
    6.6.   SUMMARY	    20

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cont.)

                                                                        Page

 7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	   23

     7.1.   HUMAN	   23
     7.2.   AQUATIC	   23

 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   24

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   24

            8.1.1.    Inhalation	   24
            8.1.2.    Oral	   24
            8.1.3.    Other Routes	   25
            8.1.4.    Weight of Evidence	   25
            8.1.5.    Quantitative Risk Estimates 	   25

     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   27

            8.2.1.    Inhalation Exposure 	   27
            8.2.2.    Oral Exposure	   27

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES 	   28

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	   28
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	   28

10.  REFERENCES	   35

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	   42
APPENDIX B: CANCER  DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF q-(* FOR ORAL
            EXPOSURE	   45
APPENDIX C: SUMMARY TABLE FOR 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE	   46
                                      1x

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

No.                               Title                                Paqe
6-1     Incidence of Tumors In F344 Rats and B6C3F1  Mice Treated
        with Technical Grade 1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne In the Diet
        for 78 Weeks	    16

9-1     Oral Toxlclty Summary for 1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne	    29

9-2     Oral Composite Scores for 1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne 	    30

9-3     l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne: Hlmlmum Effective Dose (MED) and
        Reportable Quantity (RQ)	    31

9-4     Derivation of Potency Factor (F) for 1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne. .    34

-------
                            LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADI                     Acceptable  dally Intake
BCF                     Bloconcentratlon factor
CAS                     Chemical  Abstract  Service
CS                      Composite score
DNA                     DeoxyMbonuclelc add
EC5Q                    Concentration  producing 50* Immobilization
Koc                     Soil  sorptlon  coefficient
Kow                     Octanol/water  partition coefficient
LC5Q                    Concentration  lethal  to 50% of  recipients
1050                    Dose  lethal to 50% of recipients
MED                     Minimum effective dose
ppm                     Parts  per million
RQ                      Reportable  quantity
RV
-------
                               1.   INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    The  chemical  commonly known  as  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1s  also known as
hydrazobenzene;    sym-dlphenylhydrazlne;    N,N-b1an1l1ne;    and   benzene,
I,l-hydrazob1s- (HSDB,  1987).   The structure,  empirical  formula, molecular
weight and CAS Registry number  for 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne are as  follows:

                                    NH-NH
                           >^	/J
Empirical formula: £-12^12^2
Molecular weight: 184.24
CAS Registry number: 122-66-7
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL  PROPERTIES
    1,2-Dlphenylhydrazlne Is a  solid  at ambient temperatures  (Weast,  1985).
It  1s  Insoluble 1n water  and  acetic  add, slightly  soluble 1n benzene  but
very  soluble  In  ethanol  (HSDB,   1987).    Selected  physical  properties of
1.2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  are   listed  below   (Weast,  1985,   unless  otherwise
stated):
                          131°C
                          not determined
                          1.158 g/cm8  at 16/4°C
    Melting point:
    Boiling point:
    Density:
    water solubility:
    Vapor pressure:
    Log Kow:
                          314.5 mg/l (estimated from the  Kow value
                          and the regression equation,  log  S (ymol/l)  =
                          -1.37 log Kow + 7.26 as  given 1n  Lyman  et  al.,
                          1982)
                          not determined
                          2.94 (Hansch and Leo, 1985)
0075d
                                    -1-
12/10/87

-------
    l,2-D1phenylhydrazloe 1s a reactive chemical;  H  Is  not  stable  In  air or
In water.  It autooxldlzes  1n air,  rearranges  to  benzldlne  In strong mineral
adds and decomposes when heated  (U.S.  EPA,  1981).   l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne 1s
unstable  even  1n  aqueous  solutions  of  moderate pH.   At  a  pH of  10,  U
apparently decomposes primarily  to  azobenzene;  at a pH  of 2,  1t  degrades to
benzldlne; and  at  a pH  of 7,  1t  degrades  to  an unidentified oxldlzable
product(s) (Rlggln and Howard,  1979).
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    Bofors Lakeway  Inc.,  Huskegon, HI, reported  that production of 1,2-dl-
phenylhydrazlne In 1977 ranged from 0.1-1.0 million  pounds (U.S.  EPA,  1981).
No production data  for  this compound were available from 1979  to date  (U.S.
EPA,  1981;  SRI, 1987;  USITC,  1986).   It  Is  likely  that  the  production  of
this  compound  1n  the United States  has been  greatly reduced because of  the
known adverse health effects; however,  FabMcolor  Inc.,  Patterson,  NJ,  which
manufactures   benz1d1ne-based  dyes  and  both C1ba-Ge1gy  Corp.,  Suffern,  NY,
and R.S.A Corp.,  Ardsley, NY.  which  manufacture  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne-based
drugs may still use this chemical  (U.S.  EPA.  1981;  SRI,  1987).   It 1s  not
known whether these  companies  produce this chemical on  site  or use  Imported
!,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.   In  1983,  only 22,161 pounds  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne
was Imported  In the  United  States  through  principal  custom districts  (USITC,
1984).   l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  Is produced  by  the reduction  of nitrobenzene
with  zinc dust  or  Iron  powder  In an alkaline  solution or by  the electrolytic
reduction of  nitrobenzene (U.S.  EPA, 1981).
1.4.   USE DATA
    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne 1s  used  mainly  as  the  starting  material for  the
production of benz1d1ne-based dyes  and  as  an Intermediate  In  the  manufacture
of  Pharmaceuticals  such  as  sulflnpyrazone and   phenylbutazone  (U.S.  EPA,
1981).

0075d                               -2-                              03/08/88

-------
1.5.   SUMMARY
    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  1s  a   solid  at  ambient  temperatures;   It   1s
Insoluble  In water  but  highly  soluble  1n ethanol  (Heast,  1985).   It  Is
unstable  In  both  air  and  water  under  normal  conditions  (U.S.  EPA,  1981;
Rlggln and Howard, 1979).  1,2-01phenylhydraz1ne  Is  commonly  produced  by  the
reduction  of  nitrobenzene with  zinc dust  In  alkaline  solution  (U.S.  EPA.
1981). In  1977,  one company  In  the United  States  produced between 0.1  and
1.0 million pounds of this chemical.  Because of  Us adverse health effects,
the  production  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne   In  the   United  States  has  been
greatly  reduced  In recent years  (U.S.  EPA, 1981).   Data  regarding  current
producers  or  production  volumes   of   1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne   In  the  United
States were  not  available  (USITC,  1986;  SRI, 1987).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne
Is  used  primarily  In  the production  of   benz1d1ne-based  dyes  and   1n  the
manufacture  of  such  Pharmaceuticals as  sulflnpyrazone  and  phenylbutazone
(U.S. EPA,  1981).
0075d                               -3-                              03/08/88

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    Limited  Information  regarding the  fate  of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  the
atmosphere was  located 1n  the  available  literature.  In  air,  1,2-dlphenyl-
hydrazlne will  be  rapidly converted  to azobenzene  (Callahan et al.,  1979);
however,  the  species  responsible  for  this  oxidation   Is  not  known  with
certainty.   Although  molecular  oxygen  may convert  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  to
azobenzene  In  aerated aqueous  solution  (Callahan  et al.,  1979),  the  most
likely  species  to  oxidize  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne In  the atmosphere Is  H0«.
No  experimental  value for  the  rate  constant of  H0» reaction with  l,2-d1-
phenylhydrazlne  Is available.    Based  on  the Graphical  Exposure  Modeling
System  (GEMS)  of  the  U.S.  EPA  (1986b),  the rate constant for  this  reaction
was  estimated  as  S.AxlO"11  cmVmolecule-sec.    If  the  concentration  of
these  radicals  In the  atmosphere  Is assumed   to   be  8xlOs  molecules/cm3
(U.S.  EPA.   1986b),  the  half-life  of  this  reaction  Is  ~7  hours.   Because
!,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne   absorbs   substantial  amounts  of  light  of  wavelength
>290  nm  (HSOB,  1987),  direct  photolysis  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  In  the
atmosphere 1s also  likely  to occur,  although  the half-life  of  this  reaction
cannot be estimated.
    The  fate of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne with  respect  to transport In and  out
of  the  atmosphere  1s  uncertain.  Based on the expected  short  half-life  for
the oxidation of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne to  azobenzene,  It  1s  the transport  of
azobenzene (azobenzene may be stable  In air)  that may determine the  ultimate
fate of 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne In air.
2.2.   WATER
    Limited  experimental  data  are  available  regarding  the  fate of  1,2-dl-
phenylhydrazlne 1n  water.   The photolysis  of l,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne with  UV


0075d                               -4-                              03/08/88

-------
light  consisting  of   wavelengths  <290  nm  (solar  cutoff  wavelength)   was
reported by  Callahan  et al.  (1979)  and Shlzuka  et  al.  (1970).   In  aerated
solutions,   1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  was  oxidized  to  azobenzene,  and  In   the
presence  of   hydrogen-donating  solvents  both  azobenzene  and  aniline  were
formed.   Since   the   photooxldatlon   reaction  1s  easily   reversible   and
azobenzene may  not  undergo further  photolysis,  this  reaction may not serve
as a  significant process  for  the  degradation of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne.   If
1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  or Us  oxidized  product  (azobenzene),  however,  remain
sorbed to organic partlculate matters that are  capable of  producing  hydrogen
donors  (e.g.,  chlorophyll  or  Us  derivatives)  In water,  1,2-dlphenylhydra-
zlne may be  degraded  to aniline during  photolysis (Callahan et al.,  1979).
Therefore,  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne which  can  absorb significant  solar  radia-
tion may undergo  significant photodegradatlon by  the above pathway (Callahan
et al.,  1979).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  1s  rapidly and reverslbly oxidized  to
azobenzene by  molecular  oxygen 1n  aerated  solution,  even  In the  absence  of
light.   This  reaction  Is  pH-dependent  and  Is  catalyzed  by  common  cations,
e.g.,  Cu(*2)  found  In  natural  water.   At  a  pH  of 10,  the half-life  for  the
formation of  azobenzene 1n  this  reaction  Is  -6 minutes  In  the   absence  of
Cu(+2) catalyst and 1  minute In the presence of Cu(+2) catalyst  (Callahan et
al.,   1979).   The stability of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  In  aqueous solution  In
the pH  range  of 2-10  at room  temperature  and  4°C was  studied by  Rlggln  and
Howard (1979).  More than  9OX of 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne disappeared In  <1  day
under  all conditions,  and  the rate of  disappearance was even faster  In  the
presence of chlorine.   Rlggln and Howard  (1979)  concluded  that  azobenzene 1s
formed at  a  pH  of  10 and  benzldlne  Is  formed  at a pH  of  2.   The  product
formed at pH 7 could not be Identified.
0075d                               -5-                              03/08/88

-------
    The  hydrolysis  of   1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  aqueous  solutions  1s  not
expected  to  be significant  (Callahan  et al.,  1979).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne
was  not  readily biodegradable  with aniline-acclimated  mixed  microorganisms
(Malaney,  1960).    Tabak  et  al.  (1981)  used  the  static-culture  flask-
screening  procedure  with settled  domestic  wastewater  as  mlcroblal  Inoculum
to assess  the  blodegradablllty of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne,  and  concluded  that
1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  may   undergo  significant   degradation   with   gradual
adaptation, followed by  a decrease  In  degradation  rate  because of  the toxlc-
Ity  of   the  compound toward  the microorganisms.   The  study  by Rlggln  and
Howard (1979), although  not  designed to  test  blodegradablllty, provided  some
evidence for  the  blodegradablllty of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne.   The  disappear-
ance  time  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In wastewater  (half-life  of 15  minutes)
was much faster than Us disappearance from distilled water  solution (half-
life of  7  hours)  under  similar conditions.  In wastewater,  the half-life of
disappearance of 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  under anaerobic  conditions was 1  hour.
    No experimental  data  regarding  the transport  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne 1n
water were  located  In  the  available  literature.   According   to Callahan  et
al.  (1979),  volatilization  of 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne from water  Is  likely to
be Insignificant.   The  estimated KQ(.  value  of  561  (HSOB,  1987)  for  1,2-dl-
phenylhydrazlne  Indicates moderate  adsorption  to  suspended  particles  and
sediments  1n water;  however,  this compound 1s expected  to  exist In  equilib-
rium with  azobenzene In aerated  water.   Since  the  K    value  for  azobenzene
Is much  higher (670-6410)  (HSDB, 1987)   than 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne,  adsorp-
tion  and subsequent possible  donation  of hydrogen  by  the adsorbent during
photolysis may become  an  Important process  (HSOB,  1987;  Callahan   et  al.,
1979).
0075d                               -6-                              03/08/88

-------
    The estimated log BCF value of  2.00  Indicates  that  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne
will have  a relatively  low  bloconcentratlon potential  In  fish.   The  esti-
mated  log  BCF   of   azobenzene,  the  equilibrium  product  of  1,2-dlphenyl-
hydrazlne,  Is  much  higher  (3.82),  however,  and  azobenzene would  therefore
have a higher potential  for  bloconcentratlon In  fish  (HSOB,  1987).
2.3.   SOIL
    No experimental  data regarding  the fate  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  1n soil
were located  1n the available  literature.   Based on  the predicted  fate  of
this  chemical   In  water,  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  will  probably  (because  of
oxidation  by  0-)  be  unstable  on  soil  surfaces.   The  oxidation  may  be
further enhanced by  the catalytic actions of  common  cations  In  soil.   Beyond
the  surfldal   layer  where  anaerobic   conditions   exist,  some   loss   of
l.2-d1phenylhydraz1ne due to blodegradatlon  1s  expected  to  occur.   Since  the
compound  and  Us equilibrium  product have  moderate to  high soil  sorptlon
coefficients and may not have a long  lifetime  1n soils, they may  not  leach
Into groundwater under  most  circumstances.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    Limited  data  were available  In  the  literature  regarding  the fate  and
transport  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  any  environmental  media.   In  air,
direct photolysis, oxidation by molecular  oxygen  and  reaction  with  H0>  are
expected  to convert  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne   Into  azobenzene.   The  half-life
for the  conversion of 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne to  azobenzene by  photochemlcally
produced  HO-  Is estimated to be  -7 hours  (U.S.  EPA,  1986b).  The  fate  and
transport  of  l.2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1n  the  atmosphere   will  be  controlled
Indirectly  by  Us  oxidation product  azobenzene.   Photolysis, reaction with
molecular  oxygen and  blodegradatlon  may   be  responsible  for  the  loss  of
1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne from water  (Callahan  et al.,  1979).  The half-life  of


0075d                               -7-                              03/08/88

-------
1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  In  clean water  may  be  7 hours  and In wastewater  15
minutes  (Rlggln and  Howard,  1979);  however,  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  may not  be
degraded  In  water but  may  be  converted  Into  azobenzene (Callahan  et  al.,
1979).   As  In the case  of air,  the  fate of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  water
will be  controlled by azobenzene, which  may undergo  further  degradation Into
aniline  and other products  (Callahan et  al.,  1979).  Similarly,  the transport
of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne In water will be  controlled  by azobenzene formed  as
a  result of  oxidation  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.   In   soils,  l,2-d1phenyl-
hydrazlne will  undergo  rapid  oxidation  In  the presence  of  0. and  certain
metal   cations  and may  undergo both  aerobic (primarily  In  top layers)  and
anaerobic (In deeper  soil  layers)  blodegradatlon.   1,2-Dlphenylhydrazlne and
particularly  Its  oxidation  product  (azobenzene)  will  be  moderately  to
strongly adsorbed  In soils and are  not  likely  to leach  to  groundwater  from
most soils.
0075d                               -8-                              03/08/88

-------
                                 3.  EXPOSURE

    Workers  Involved  In  the manufacture of  certain  dyes  and Pharmaceuticals
are  likely  to  be  occupatlonally  exposed  to  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  both
through  Inhalation  and dermal routes  of  exposure;   however,  no  experimental
data  other  than  a  reported  level  of 0.006-3000  pg/4.  In  the  air  of  a
Czeckoslovaklan benzldlne manufacturing plant were  located  In  the available
literature to  confirm  this  prediction.   Although a  survey of  drinking water
from  10  U.S.  cities  for the  presence of  carcinogenic  substances  found  no
1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  1n the  finished  water at the  treatment  plant,  one  tap
water  sample was  found  to  contain  1  pg/l  of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  (U.S.
EPA,  1980a).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne was not found   In water from  Lake  Erie
and Lake Michigan (Great Lakes Water  Quality Board,  1983),  but was quantita-
tively  detected   In  sedlment/soll/water  samples  from Love Canal,  Niagara
Falls, NY  (Hauser and Bromberg,  1982).  1,2-01phenylhydraz1ne has  not  been
detected In any foods In  the United States  or elsewhere.
0075d                               -9-                              03/08/88

-------
                             4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY



4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY



    In  statU  tests  with  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne,  24-hour  and  96-hour  LC5Qs



of  1.2  and 0.27  mg/l,  respectively,  were  determined  for   the  blueglll,



Lepomls macrochlrus (Buccafusco et al., 1981; U.S. EPA, 1978).



    LeBlanc  (1980)  and  U.S.  EPA  (1978)  determined 24- and  96-hour  LC5Qs  of



8.1 and  4.1 mg/l,  respectively,  for  Daphnla  magna  In  static  tests; a  no-



dlscernlble-effect  concentration   was  determined   to  be   0.41   mg/l.    A



48-hour EC,, was determined for Daphnla magna (Randall and Knopp,  1980).
          3U


4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS



    Pertinent data  regarding  the  chronic  effects of 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  1n



aquatic  animals  were  not  located  In  the available literature  cited  1n



Appendix A.



4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS



    Pertinent  data regarding  effects  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1.ne  on  aquatic



plants were not located 1n the available literature cited In Appendix A.



4.4.   SUMMARY



    Aquatic  toxlclty   Information   for  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  Is  limited  to



acute lethality data  for two  freshwater  animal  species.   These data Indicate



that  the  no-d1scern1ble-effect   concentration  for  Daphnla  magna  Is  0.41



mg/l,   that  24-hour  LCcns  for Lepomls  macrochlrus  and Daphnla  magna  are
                       t>u       —	  	      —	     —


1.2  and   8.1  mg/l,  respectively,  and   that   96-hour   LC  s   for  Lepomls



macrochlrus and Daphnla magna are 0.27 and 4.1  mg/l, respectively.
0075d                               -10-                             03/08/88

-------
                             5.   PHARMACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Pertinent data  regarding the  rate  and extent  of  absorption of  1,2-dl-
phenylhydrazlne  were  not   located  In  the  available  literature  cited  In
Appendix  A.   The  Identification  of  unchanged  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne   and
metabolites  1n  the  urine  of rats  following  oral  and  Intratracheal  dosing
with  l,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  (Dutklewkz  and Szymanska,  1973) (Section 5.3.)
Indicates  that  absorption  by  the gastrointestinal and  respiratory  tracts
occurs.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    Pertinent data  regarding the distribution of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  were
not located 1n the available literature  cited  1n  Appendix  A.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    The  results  of  thin-layer  chromatographlc  analyses  of  urine from  rats
that  were  treated  wHh  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne   by  different   routes  were
reported 1n  an abstract  of  a Polish  study  (Dutk1ew1cz  and  Szymanska,  1973).
Urine  contained  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne,  benzldlne,  aniline,  two  unspecified
hydroxy  derivatives  of  benzldlne  and two  unknown compounds following  oral
doses  of 200 or  400 mg/kg,  and 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne,  aniline,  benzldlne,
p-amlnophenol and  o-amlnophenol  following  Intraperltoneal  doses  of  100  or
200 mg/kg.   One  urinary metabolite,  which appeared  to be  phenolic but  was
otherwise  uncharacterlzed,   was  found  after  Intratracheal  or  Intravenous
Injection of  unspecified doses.   Additional Information regarding  the  design
or results of these experiments  was not  reported.
    It has  been  suggested  that  benzldlne  may  be  produced from  1,2-dlphenyl-
hydrazlne by acidity 1n the stomach (IARC, 1972).
0075d                               -11-                             12/10/87

-------
5.4.   EXCRETION
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  rate and  extent of  excretion of  l,2-d1-
phenylhydrazlne  were  not  located   1n  the  available  literature  dted  In
Appendix  A.   The  Identification  of  unchanged  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  and
metabolites  In  the urine  following  oral  dosing  of  rats with  1,2-dlphenyl-
hydrazlne  (Dutklewlcz and  Szymanska,  1973)  (see  Section  5.3.)  Indicates that
some excretion occurs 1n the urine.
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Limited  pharmacoklnetlc  data for  rats  Indicate that  1,2-dlphenylhydra-
zlne 1s absorbed by the gastrointestinal and respiratory  tracts  and  excreted
as  unchanged  compound and  metabolites 1n  the  urine.   Specific  Information
regarding  the  rate and extent  of absorption or  excretion, other  excretory
pathways or  distribution  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  1s not  available.   Identi-
fied urinary metabolites In rats Include aniline,  benzldlne and amlnophenols.
0075d                               -12-                             12/10/87

-------
                                  6.   EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the subchronlc  or
chronic  toxic  effects  of  Inhaled  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  were not  located  1n
the available literature cited 1n Appendix A.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — In  dose-selection  studies  for   the  NCI  (1978)
carclnogenesls bloassay,  groups  of  five  F344 rats  and  five B6C3F1 mice  of
each sex were maintained  for  4 weeks  on  diets that contained technical grade
1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne,   followed  by a  2-week  observation  period.    Hale  rat
and  male mouse  groups  received  diets containing 0, 0.007, 0.014,  0.028,
0.055.  0.108,  0.214.  0.301  or  0.423% of the  compound.   Female  rat  groups
received diets  containing 0, 0.00008,  0.0003,  0.0011, 0.002, 0.004,  0.015,
0.104, 0.731 or  5.138%  of the compound.  Female mouse groups received diets
containing  0,  0.0003,  0.0008, 0.0011, 0.002,  0.004,  0.015,   0.104.  0.731  or
5.138% of  the  compound.  Deaths  occurred  In  2/5 male rats at 0.108%  and  In
all  rats of both  sexes  at  higher concentrations.   Deaths  occurred  In  1/5
male  mice  at  0.301%,  In  2/5  male mice  at   0.423%.  1n  4/5  female mice  at
0.731% and  1n  all  female  mice  at 5.138%.  Body weight and  gross  pathologic
evaluations were conducted 1n both species,   but  Information  regarding these
endpolnts  was  limited  and ambiguous;  NCI (1978) Indicated  that  the  only
consistent  effect   was   Intestinal   hemorrhage  In  mice   at   unspecified
concentrations.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC -- Groups of 50 F344 rats or  47 or  50 B6C3F1 mice of
each  sex were  maintained  for  78 weeks  on   diets that  contained technical
grade  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1n a  carclnogenldty  bloassay  (NCI,  1978).   As
detailed In Section 6.2.2., the  diet  concentrations  were  0.008%  (TWA concen-
tration) and  0.03% for male  rats.  0.004% and 0.01%  for  female  rats,  0.008%

0075d                               -13-                             12/10/87

-------
(TWA concentration) and  0.04% for  male mice and  0.004% and  0.04X for  female
mice.   The  rats  and  mice were  observed  for  28-30 weeks  and 17-18  weeks,
respectively, following  treatment, and  separate control  groups  of 49-50 rats
or  50  mice  of  each  sex were  used  for   each  treatment group.   Treatment-
related effects  In  the rats  Included  slight  mean group body  weight  depres-
sion  In the  high-dose  males  and low-  and high-dose  females,  and  reduced
survival 1n  the high-dose  females.   In mice,  mean  group body weights  were
depressed and survival was  reduced In the high-dose male and  female  groups.
NCI  (1978)   concluded  that  there  were no  treatment-related  nonneoplastlc
lesions In  the rats or  mice.
6.1.3.    Other  Relevant  Information.   The average amount  of   1,2-d1phenyl-
hydrazlne Ingested by  deer  mice  over  a 3-day period without killing  >50X of
the animals was determined  to be 1213 mg/kg/day  (Schafer and  Bowles,  1985).
NIOSH (1987) reported an  oral L05Q of  301  mg/kg for rats.
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.    Inhalation.    Pertinent   data   regarding  the  carclnogenlclty   of
Inhaled 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  were not  located  In the  available literature
cited In Appendix A.
6.2.2.    Oral.  NCI  (1978)  conducted a  carclnogenlclty bloassay  1n  which
groups  of 50  F344 rats or 47 or  50 B6C3F1 mice of each sex were maintained
on  diets  containing   technical  grade  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  for  78  weeks,
followed by untreated observation periods  of 28 or 30  weeks  (rats)  and 17 or
18  weeks  (mice).   Separate groups  of 49-50  rats or  50 mice  of  each  sex
served as controls for each  treatment  group.  Comprehensive  gross and  hUto-
loglcal examinations  were  conducted  on  all  animals  that  died  during  the
study  (unless  precluded  by  unspecified  factors),   were   sacrificed  when
moribund,  or were sacrificed at termination of  the study.


0075d                               -14-                             03/08/88

-------
    The diet  concentrations  of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  used  In the  rat  study
were 0.007%  for  9 weeks and 0.008%  for  the subsequent 69 weeks  (0.008%  TWA
concentration) In  low-dose  males, 0.03%  In  high-dose  males,  0.004%  In  low-
dose females  and  0.01%  In high-dose  females  (NCI, 1978).   As   detailed  In
Table  6-1,   there were  statistically  significant   Increased  Incidences  of
hepatocellular carcinomas  or  neoplastlc  nodules  In  the  liver  1n low-  and
high-dose males  and  squamous-cell carcinomas and paplllomas of  the Zymbal's
gland,   ear  canal  or  skin  of the ear and  adrenal  pheochromocytomas 1n  the
high-dose males.   Statistically  Increased  Incidences  of  neoplastlc  nodules
1n the  liver  and mammary  gland  adenocarclnomas occurred  In high-dose female
rats.
    The diet concentrations of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne In the mouse study  were
0.007%  for  9 weeks and 0.008%  for the subsequent  69  weeks (0.008%  TWA)  In
low-dose males,  0.04% In  high-dose  males.  0.004%  In  low-dose   females  and
0.04%  In high-dose females (NCI,   1978).   An Increased Incidence  of  hepato-
cellular  carcinomas   or  adenomas  1n  the  high-dose  females  was  the  only
treatment-related neoplastlc effect In the mice.
    Survival  and  body weight   data  for   the  rats and  the  mice  1n  the  NCI
(1978)   study are summarized In  Section 6.1.2.2.   Treatment-related decreased
survival occurred In  the  high-dose  groups of  both  species,  but  adequate
numbers of animals survived to be  at  risk  for late-developing  tumors.
    l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne In sunflower oil was administered to mice and  rats
1n  the diet  at  doses of  30  mg/an1mal,   5  times/week  over a  period of  588
days.  In a   Russian  study  (PUss,   1974).    Neoplasms   Including  pulmonary
adenomas, liver  tumors or  leukemia developed In  50% of the treated mice  and
rats.   Tumor  Incidence data were  not reported for  control  groups.  The  only
additional  Information  regarding  this  study  reported by  U.S.   EPA  (1980a,


0075d                               -15-                             03/08/88

-------
                                                         TABLE 6-1



Incidence of Tuoors  In F344  Rats  and  B6C3F1  Nice  Treated with Technical Grade  1,2-Dlphenylhydrazlne  In  the Diet  for 78 Weeks3
4
1
L




_J
T>







ISJ
o
00
Diet
Species Sex Concentration
(*)b
Rat N Oc
of
0.0089
0.03
N Oe
of
0.0089
0.03
M 0*
of
0.008e
0.03
F 0*
of

Duration
of Study
(weeks)
108
109
107
106
108
109
107
106
108
109
107
107
109
109

Tuaor Site
liver
liver
liver
liver
Zymbal's gland ear
canal. Zymbal's gland
and skin of ear
Zyobal's gland ear
canal. Zyabal's gland
and skin of ear
Zymbal's gland ear
canal. Zymbal's gland
and skin of ear
Zymbal's gland ear
canal. Zymbal's gland
and skin of ear
adrenal
adrenal
adrenal
adrenal
liver
liver

Tumor Type
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma or neoplastlc nodule
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma or neoplastlc nodule
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma or neoplastlc nodule
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma or neoplastlc nodule
squamous-cell carcinoma
squamous-cell carcinoma or papllloma
squamous-cell carcinoma
squamous-cell carcinoma or papllloma
squamous-cell carcinoma
squamous-cell carcinoma or papllloma
squannus-cell carcinoma
squamous-cell carcinoma or papllloma
pheochromocytoma or malignant pheochromocytoma
pheochromocytoma or malignant pheochronncytoma
pheochromocytoma or malignant pheochroroocytoma
pheochromocytoma or malignant pheochromocytoma
neoplastlc nodule
neoplastlc nodule

Tumor Incidence0
(p value)*)
0/47
5/«7
1/48
1/48
5/49 (p=0.031)
13/49 (p=0.040)
31/49 (p<0.001)
37/49 (p<0.001)
0/47
1/47
0/48
0/48
I/SO (NS)
?/SO (NS)
5/49 (p.O. 030)
7/49 |p=0.007)
7/47
8/47
7/48 (NS)
16/46 (p=0.04?)
0/47
0/50


-------
                                                                        TABU 6-1  (cont.)
0
0
-J
in
a.







i
-j

Diet
Spectes Sex Concentration
<*)b
Rat F 0.004
0.01
f 0*
0'
0.004
0.01
House F Oe
Qf
0.004
0.04
Duration
of Study
(weeks)
108
107
109
109
108
107
96
96
95
96
Tumor Site
liver
liver
nanndry gland
•anoary gland
oamary gland
naonary gland
liver
liver
liver
liver
Tumor Type
neoplastlc nodule
neoplastlc nodule
adenocarclnona NOS
adenocarclnona NOS
adenocarclnoma NOS
adenocarclnona NOS
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma
hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma
Tumor Incidence
(p value)0*
0/50 (NS)
6/50 (p.O. 013)
1/48
0/50
3/50 (HS)
6/50 (p=0.013)
2/47
2/47
1/50
1/50
4/39 (NS)
4/39 (NS)
20/43 (p<0.001)
22/43 (p<0.001)
         Strength of Study:
         Overall Adequacy:
                                                              QUALITY OF EVIDENCE
                      The compound was adntnlstered to both sexes of two species at two dose levels  by  a  natural route.   Adequate numbers of
                      animals survived to be at risk for late-developing tumors.
                      Adequate
rxj
>^
o
00
aSource:  NCI. 1978
 Control groups were used for each treatment group.
cTumor Incidence Is expressed as number of animals with tumors/number  of animals  examined hlstologlcally.
 The p value for the Fisher Exact test Is shown next to the Incidence  In the treated group when p<0.05;  otherwise.  NS Is  Indicated.
eLow dose control group
 High dose control group
9THA concentration (see text)
HS = Not significant; NOS = not otherwise specified

-------
1981)  Is  that  the rats  received  a total dose  of  12.57 g,  that  the minimal
tumor  latency period was 372  days  and  that  some animals (number unspecified)
had to be replaced during the experiment because of a parasitic Infection.
6.2.3.   Other Relevant  Information.   Additional cardnogenldty studies  of
1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne,  Inadequately reported, were  conducted  by Pllss (1974)
and  summarized  by U.S.  EPA  (1980a.  1981).  It appears  that  these  studies
also were conducted  over a  period of 588 days.  Eplcutaneous application  of
2 mg 3 times/week  (360 mg total)  to mice produced  a 22.2% Incidence of skin,
lung or  liver  tumors;  the  Incidence  of tumors  In  a control group  was  17%.
Eplcutaneous application of  30  mg 5  times/week  to  rats was  not tumorlgenlc.
Subcutaneous Injection of 5  mg/week  (370 mg total)  to  mice  produced a 36.6%
Incidence  of  rhabdomyosarcomas,  and  subcutaneous   Injection  of  40  mg/week
(3.8 g total) to rats produced  a  22.6%  Incidence of total  tumors,  consisting
of tumors of the uterus, mammary  gland,  Zymbal's gland,  liver and  spleen and
lymphold leukemia.   The  minimal latent  period  for  tumor  formation  following
subcutaneous Injection was  188  days,  but  control  data for  the subcutaneous
studies and additional  data  for  all of the studies  were not reported.
    l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  In  olive   oil  vehicle   was  administered  to  52
Sherman  rats  of  both  sexes  by  subcutaneous   Injection  once  a  week at  an
average  dose  of 60  mg  (Spitz  et  al.,   1950).   Treatment  was  continued  for
life  or  until  grossly  obvious  tumors   appeared,  unless  contralndlcated  by
weight loss or  Illness  (total amount  administered,  6.4 g).   A  control group
consisted of  50 vehicle-treated  rats.   H1stopatholog1c  examination  of  the
liver, external  auditory canal,  colon   and  bladder showed  a  squamous  cell
carcinoma of the auditory canal sebaceous glands In one of the treated rats.
0075d                               -18-                             03/08/88

-------
It  appears  that comprehensive hlstopathologlcal  examinations  were conducted
1n  this  study,  but data for other  sites were  not reported  and the extent of
the examinations was not specified.
    The  tumor 1 gen 1cHy  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne was evaluated  In  a  Strain A
mouse  pulmonary  tumor  assay (Haronpot et al.,  1986).   Groups  of 10  male and
10  female mice  were  given  Intraperltoneal  Injections  of 50, 100 or 200 mg/kg
In  trlcaprylln  vehicle  3 times/week for 8 weeks.   Examinations for  adenomas
16  weeks after  cessation   of  treatment showed a  positive response  1n  the
high-dose  males  (statistically  significant  Increases  In  the  Incidence  of
tumor-bearing mice and  tumors per  mouse).   There was  an  equivocal  response
In  the high-dose  females  (significant  Increase In tumors  per  mouse but not
Incidence of tumor-bearing mice).
    Abstracts of several  Russian  studies  report  that  combined subcutaneous
administration  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne (20  mg/week)   and  benzldlne sulfate
.(15 mg/week)  to rats Increased  the Incidence  of  tumors  and  decreased tumor
latency  periods when  compared  with  the  activities of the  Individual  com-
pounds  (Genln  et  al.,  1975; Shabad  and Genln,  1975;  Kurlyandsk11  et  al.,
1976).   The  Kurlyandskll   et  al.  (1976)  abstract   Indicates  that  these
observations refer to  bladder cancer.  Duration  of  treatment  and additional
relevant Information were not reported In any of  the abstracts.
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  (practical   grade)   Induced   reverse   mutations  In
Salmonella  typhlmurlum  strain TA100,  but not  strains  TA1535,  TA1537  or TA98,
when  tested In  a  liquid suspension assay with  rat liver  S-9  metabolic acti-
vation  preparation (Haworth et al.,  1983).   The compound  was  not mutagenlc
1n  any  of  the   strains  when tested  with  hamster  liver  S-9  or  without S-9
preparations.


0075d                               -19-                             03/08/88

-------
    Reverse  mutation  plate   Incorporation  assays  were  conducted  In  which
Salmonella typhlmurlum  strains  TA98,  TOO,  1535, 1537 or  1538  or  Escher1ch1a
coll strain WP2  uvrA were  exposed  to  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  (technical  grade,
purity  >65%)  with   or  without rat,  mouse  or  hamster  liver  S-9  metabolic
activation preparations  (Dunkel et al.,  1985).  Consistent and  unequivocal
positive responses were  obtained  only with SL.  typhlmurlum  strain TA100 when
assayed with rat or mouse liver S-9 preparations.
    Thymldlne Incorporation  Into  testlcular DMA was  significantly  Inhibited
In  mice  that received  a  single  Intraperltoneal  dose  of 100 mg/kg  l,2-d1-
phenylhydrazlne (purity not stated) (Seller, 1977).
    Practical   grade  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  In  ethanol  did  not   Induce
sex-linked recessive lethal  mutations  In  male  DrosophUa  melanoqaster  when
administered by feeding for 3  days  at a  concentration of 50 ppm or  by  Intra-
perltoneal Injection at  a  concentration  of 80  ppm  (additional  dose  Informa-
tion not reported) (Yoon et al., 1985).
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
       Pertinent  data  regarding the  teratogenldty  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne
were not located 1n  the available literature cited 1n Appendix  A.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding  other  reproductive  effects  of  1,2-d1phenyl-
hydrazlne were not located In the available literature dted In Appendix A.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    Limited  toxlclty data  are available  for  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.   Four-
week feeding  studies conducted by  the NCI  (1978) showed that  diets  contain-
ing >0.108 and  0.301%  of compound produced deaths  1n rats  and mice,  respec-
tively.  Intestinal  hemorrhage  1n  mice at  unspecified concentrations was the
only  gross  pathologic  effect  attributed  to  treatment.   In chronic  oral


0075d                               -20-                             12/10/87

-------
studies, rats  and  mice were treated  1n  the  diet for 78 weeks  at  concentra-
tions of 0.008  or  0.03X (male  rats), 0.004 or 0.01%  (female  rats),  0.008  or
0.04%  (male  mice)   and  0.004 or  0.04%  (female  mice)  (NCI,  1978).   Effects
Included decreased body weight gain  In the high-dose  male  and low- and  high-
dose  female   rats,  decreased  survival   1n  the  high-dose   female  rats, and
decreased  body weight  and  decreased survival  In  the  high-dose  male and
female  mice.    NCI  (1978)  concluded that  there  were  no  treatment-related
nonneoplastlc gross or Mstologlcal  alterations In  either  species.
    Treatment-related neoplastlc  effects occurred   1n  the  NCI  (1978)  study.
Including  hepatocellular  carcinomas  1n  the  low-  and  high-dose  male  rats,
squamous-cell  carcinomas  and pap 1 Hernias  of  the  Zymbal's  gland In  high-dose
male  rats,  adrenal   pheochromocytomas  1n high-dose  male  rats,   neoplastlc
nodules  In the liver and mammary gland  adenocarclnomas  In high-dose  female
rats, and  hepatocellular carcinomas  1n high-dose female mice.   Also,  l,2-d1-
phenylhydrazlne was  tumoMgenlc   In  rats and  mice In Inadequately  reported
chronic oral,  subcutaneous  and dermal cardnogenlclty  studies  (Pllss,  1974),
and  produced  positive responses   1n  a Strain  A  mouse pulmonary tumor  assay
(Maronpot  et  al.,  1986).  1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  was  not  tumorlgenlc  when
administered   to rats  by subcutaneous Injection  once  weekly for life  (Spitz
et al., 1950).
    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne Induced reverse mutations  In S.  typhlmuMum strain
TA100  but  not  1n  other strains  of  $_._  typhlmurlum  or  In  E_._ coll WP2  uvrA
(Haworth et  al.,  1983; Dunkel et al.,   1985).   1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  Inhib-
ited thymldlne  Incorporation  Into mouse  testlcular DNA when  administered  by
a  single  Intraperltoneal   Injection (Seller,   1977),  but  did  not  Induce
sex-linked recessive  lethal mutations  1n DrosophUa  melanogaster (Yoon  et
al., 1985).


0075d                               -21-                              03/08/88

-------
    Information Is  not  available regarding  the  toxIcHy or carclnogenldty
of  Inhaled  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne, or  teratogenlclty  or  other  reproductive
effects of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne by  the  oral  or  Inhalation routes.
0075d                               -22-                             12/10/87

-------
                    7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    U.S. EPA  (1980a)  recommended  ambient water quality  criteria of 422,  42
and  4  ng/8. for  dlphenylhydrazlne,  which  correspond to  excess  cancer  risk
levels  of   10~5,  10~6  and  10~7,  respectively.    The  criteria  are  derived
from a  q,*  that 1s based on  the  Induction of hepatocellular  carcinomas  and
liver neoplastlc  nodules 1n male  rats  (Section  8.1.5.2.).   The q * of  0.8
(mg/kg/day)'1   has  been  verified   by   U.S.  EPA  (1987a)  and  corresponds  to
drinking  water   levels   of  4.5,   4.5XKT1   and  4.5xlO~a  jig/9,  and   air
levels  of  4.5xlO~1,   4.5xlO~2  and   4.5xlO"3  yg/m3  for   risk   levels   of
10~4, 10~5 and 10~6,  respectively.
    U.S. EPA (1987b)  has proposed an RQ of 10  for  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.
    Other  pertinent  guidelines  or   standards,   Including  drinking   water
standards,  FAO/HHO  ADIs. and  ACGIH,  OSHA and  NIOSH  occupational  exposure
limits,  were not located 1n  the available literature cited 1n Appendix  A.
7.2.   AQUATIC
    The   U.S.  EPA (1980a) did  not  recommend  criteria  for  the protection  of
aquatic   life  from  the  effects  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.   It  was  stated  that
acute toxlclty to freshwater aquatic  life  occurs  at  concentrations  as  low as
270  ug/8.,  and would  occur  at  lower   concentrations among  species that  are
more sensitive than those tested.
0075d                               -23-                             03/08/88

-------
                             8.  RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent  data   regarding   the  carclnogenlclty  of
Inhaled  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  were  not  located  In the available  literature
cited In Appendix A.
8.1.2.   Oral.   NCI  (1978)  conducted  a  cardnogenldty  bloassay  In  which
groups of 50  F344  rats  or 47 or 50  B6C3F1  mice  of each sex were  maintained
on  diets containing  technical  grade  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  for  78 weeks,
followed by untreated observation periods of 28 or  30  weeks  (rats)  and  17 or
18  weeks  (mice).  The dietary  concentrations  of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  used
In  the  rat  study  were 0.008%  (TWA concentration)  or 0.03%  In  males, and
0.004 or  0.01%  In  females.   The  dietary concentrations  used  1n  the  mouse
study were 0.008%  (TWA concentration)  or 0.04% In males,  and 0.004 or  0.04%
1n  females. Separate  groups  of 49-50 rats or  50 mice  of  each sex  served as
controls for for each treatment group.   As detailed  In Table  6-1,  there were
statistically   Increased   Incidences  of   hepatocellular  carcinomas  or   neo-
plastlc  nodules  1n  the liver  In low- and high-dose male rats,  squamous-cell
carcinomas and  paplllomas of  the  Zymbal's  gland  1n   high-dose  male  rats,
adrenal  pheochromocytomas  In high-dose  male  rats,  and  neoplasUc  nodules In
the  liver and mammary gland adenocardnomas   In high-dose  female  rats.  In
mice,  there  was  a  statistically   Increased   Incidence  of   hepatocellular
carcinomas or  adenomas 1n  the high-dose  females.
    1,2-01phenylhydraz1ne  1n  sunflower oil was administered to mice and rats
In  the diet at concentrations of 30  mg/anlmal, 5 times/week  for  588 days, 1n
an  Inadequately  reported  Russian study  (PUss,  1974).  Pulmonary  adenomas,
liver tumors  or  leukemia  occurred 1n 50% of  the  treated  mice and  rats, but
Incidences of  tumors by type  and In  control  groups  were not  reported.

0075d                               -24-                             03/08/88

-------
8.1.3.   Other  Routes.   Inadequately  reported  subcutaneous   studies   with
mice  (5 mg/week) and rats  (40 mg/week)  and  eplcutaneous  studies with mice (2
mg,  3  times/week)  were  conducted  by  PUss  (1974).   Various  tumors   were
attributed  to  treatment  (see   Section  6.2.3.),  but  Incidences  were  not
reported for  specific  tumor  types and control  data were  not  reported for the
subcutaneous  Injection studies.
    1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne was not  tumorlgenlc  when  administered to  rats  by
subcutaneous  Injection at an  average dose  of 60 mg  once  a  week  for  life
(total dose 6.4 g)  (Spitz et  al., 1950).
    The tumorlgenldty  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne was  evaluated   In a  Strain  A
mouse  pulmonary assay  (Maronpot  et  al.,  1986).   There  was  a  positive
response 1n  males  and  an equivocal  response 1n females  at  the  highest  dose
tested (200 mg/kg IntraperUoneally).
8.1.4.   Height  of  Evidence.  The  carclnogenlclty of 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne
has been demonstrated  In both rats and mice  In .adequate  oral bloassays  (NCI,
1978).   1,2-Dlphenylhydrazlne  was  also  tumorlgenlc  In   rats   and  mice  1n
Inadequately  reported  oral,  subcutaneous and dermal  carclnogenlclty  studies,
and  produced  positive  responses In  a Strain  A mouse  pulmonary  tumor  assay
and  In mutagenldty   assays.   Additionally,  the carclnogenlclty  of  other
substituted  hydrazlnes  has  been  documented  (IARC.   1974).    Based  on  the
carcinogenic  responses  In rats  and  mice In  the NCI  (1978) bloassay, 1,2-dl-
phenylhydrazlne  Is  classified  as   an EPA  Group  Bl   carcinogen  (U.S.   EPA,
1987a).
8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates.
    8.1.5.1.   INHALATION —  Inhalation   carclnogenlclty   data   for   l,2-d1-
phenylhydrazlne  are not available.   The  human  q  *  of  0.8  (mg/kg/day)"1
for  oral   exposure  was  adopted  by  the  U.S.   EPA  (1987a)  as   the  q *  for

0075d                               -25-                             05/11/88

-------
Inhalation exposure by assuming  equal  potency by either route.  The  concen-
trations of  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1n  air associated with  Increased  lifetime
risk  of  cancer  at   risk   levels  of  10~s,  10"*  and  10"7  are   4.5xlO~a,
4.5xlO"3  and 4.5xl(T«  pg/m3,  respectively   (U.S.  EPA, 1986b).   If  It  1s
assumed that  absorption  by the  Inhalation  route  Is 50%,  the  concentrations
associated  with  the  10~5,  10~* and  10~7  risk  levels  are  twice  as  high
as  those  reported above.   U.S.  EPA (1987a)  noted  that the  q * may  differ
from that stated  above 1f  air  concentrations  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  exceed
45  vg/m3,  and   that  there   Is  low  confidence   In   the  Inhalation  risk
estimate derived from oral  data.
    8.1.5.2.   ORAL -- The  U.S.  EPA (1980a)  used  the  dose-response data for
hepatocellular carcinoma and  liver neoplastlc nodules  In male rats  from the
NCI  (1978)  bloassay  to  calculate  a  human  q^  of 0.768  (mg/kg/day)"1  for
1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne.  The  data reported 1n Appendix  B were used with  the
linearized  multistage model  (U.S.  EPA,   1980b) . for   the  computation.   The
q *  [0.8  (mg/kg/day)"1]  has  been verified  by the Agency CRAVE Work  Group
Review (U.S EPA,  1987a) and  1s adopted for  this  document.  Concentrations  of
1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  1n  drinking water  associated with  Increased  lifetime
risk  of  cancer  at   risk   levels  of  10~5,  10"*  and  10"7  are   4.5X10"1,
4.5xlO"2  and   4.5xlO"3  wg/l,   respectively   (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).    It   was
noted  that  the  q * may  differ  from  that  stated  above 1f  the water  concen-
tration  of  1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne exceeds   450  yg/l,  and  that  confidence
In  the  q,* 1s  low to medium since not  all  neoplastlc nodules may  progress
to tumors (U.S.  EPA.  1987a).
0075d                               -26-                             03/08/88

-------
8.2.   SYSTEHIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.   Derivation  of  an RfD  for  less  than  lifetime
(subchronlc)  or  chronic   Inhalation  exposure  to  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  1s
precluded  by  the  lack  of  Inhalation  toxlclty  data  and  Is  Inappropriate
because of carclnogenlclty by the oral route.
8.2.2.   Oral  Exposure.   In a  4-week feeding  study,  diets  that  contained
>0.108 and  0.301X 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  produced deaths  1n  rats and  mice,
respectively  (NCI,  1978).   Chronic  exposure  of  rats  resulted  In  decreased
body weight gain at dietary  concentrations >0.004X and decreased survival  at
0.01X  (NCI,  1978).   Chronic exposure  of mice  resulted  1n  decreased  body
weight and  survival  at 0.04X.   Derivation  of  an RfD for  less  than  lifetime
(subchronlc) or  chronic oral exposure  to 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  Is  Inappro-
priate because of carclnogenlclty by the oral  route.
0075d                               -27-                             03/08/88

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    Pertinent  toxlclty data  for  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne are  available  only
from  the  NCI   (1978)   cardnogenesls  bloassay.   As  discussed  1n  Section
6.1.2.2.  and summarized In  Table  9-1,  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  was  administered
to  rats  and  mice In the diet  for  78  weeks at concentrations of  0.008% (TWA
concentration)   or  0.03%  for  male  rats,   0.004%  or  0.01%  for  female  rats,
0.008% (TWA  concentration) or  0.04%  for  male  mice  and 0.004  or  0.04%  for
female  mice.   Treatment-related  nonneoplastlc  effects  Included  slightly
decreased  mean  group  body  weight gain  1n the high-dose male  and  low-  and
high-dose  female rats,  decreased  survival 1n the high-dose  female  rats,  and
decreased  mean  group  body  weight and  decreased survival  In the  high-dose
male and  female mice.
    The  lowest  equivalent  human  doses at  which decreased  body  weight  and
decreased  survival  occurred are  0.31  and 0.76 mg/kg/day, respectively (see
Table 9-1).  Multiplication of  these  doses by 70 kg yields  MEDs  of 21.7  and
53.2 mg/day, respectively  (Table 9-2).   The  RV  s  corresponding  to  the MEDs
are  3.5  and  2.9,   respectively.   The  most  appropriate RV   for  decreased
weight gain  1s  4 and  the  RVg  for life shortening Is 10.  Multiplication  of
the  RV.s  by the  RV s   yields  CSs of  14  for  decreased weight  gain and  29
for life shortening.   Since the CS of 29  for  life shortening Is  the highest
CS, U 1s  the appropriate  basis  for the  RQ.   A CS of 29 corresponds to an RQ
of 100 (Table 9-3).
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    NCI (1978)  conducted a  carclnogenlcHy bloassay  1n  which  groups of  47-50
F344  rats  or B6C3F1 mice of  each  sex were  maintained on  diets  containing
technical  grade  1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne for  78 weeks,  followed  by  untreated
observation  periods  of 28  or  30 weeks  (rats)  and  17  or  18 weeks (mice).

0075d                               -28-                             03/08/88

-------
o
o
ex

TABLE 9-1
Oral Toxlclty Suraury for Technical Grade '
Species/
Strain
Rat/F344
Rat/F344
Rat/F344
i
** House/
B6C3F1
Average
Sex No. at Me1ghtb
Start (kg)
N SO 0.35
F SO 0.25
F SO 0.25
H.F SO 0.03 (N)
0.025 (F)
Vehicle/
Physical Exposure
State
diet 0.03X for
78 weeks
diet 0.004X for
78 weeks
diet 0.01X for
78 weeks
diet 0.04X for
78 weeks

l.2-D1phenylhydrai1ned
Transformed Equivalent
Animal Dosec Human Dosed
(mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day)
15 2.56
2 0.31
5 0.76
52 3.69e


Response
decreased body
weight gain
decreased body
weight gain
decreased body
weight gain and
Increased mortality
decreased body
weight gain and
Increased mortality
         ^Source: NCI. 1978

         '•Estimated from growth curves In the study

         Calculated  by  multiplying dietary concentration  In  ppn by reference  food  consumption estimates (5X bw/day  for  rats.  13%  bw/day for mice)
          (U.S. EPA. 1985)

         ^Calculated  by  multiplying  the  transformed  animal dose  by  the cube  root  of  the  ratio of  the  animal  body  weight  to  reference  human body
          weight (70 kg)

         Calculated using female mouse body weight
ro

o
00

-------
                                  TABLE 9-2



        Oral  Composite Scores  for  l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne  Using  the  Rat*
Animal Dose
(mg/kg/day)
2
5
Chronic
Human MED
(mg/day)
21.7
53.2
RVd Effect
3.5 decreased weight
gain
2.9 decreased sur-
vival and de-
creased weight
RVe CS RQ
4 14 1000
10 29 100
*Source:  NCI,  1978
0075d
-30-
12/10/87

-------
                                  TABLE 9-3



                            1,2-Dlphenylhydrazlne



          Minimum Effective Dose  (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)







Route:                  oral



Dose*:                  0.76 mg/kg/day



Effect:                  decreased  survival  and  decreased  weight



Reference:               NCI, 1978



RVd:                    2.9



RVe:                    10



Composite Score:         29



RQ:                     100
'Equivalent human dose
0075d                               -31-                             12/10/87

-------
The dietary  concentrations  were 0.008  or  0.03% 1n  the  male  rats, 0.004  or
0.01%  1n  the female  rats,  0.008  or  0.04% 1n  the  male mice,  and 0.004  or
0.04%  In  the  female mice.   Separate groups of 49-50 rats or 50 mice of  each
sex served as controls  for  each treatment  group.  As detailed  In  Table  6-1,
there  were  statistically Increased  Incidences  of  hepatocellular  carcinomas
or  neoplastlc  nodules   In  the liver  1n  low-  and  high-dose  male  rats,
squamous-cell carcinomas  and  papHlomas of the  Zymbal's gland 1n high-dose
male rats, adrenal  pheochromocytomas  1n high-dose  male  rats,  and  neoplastlc
nodules In the  liver  and mammary  gland adenocarclnomas  1n high-dose  female
rats.    In   mice,   there   was   a   statistically   Increased   Incidence   of
hepatocellular carcinomas or adenomas  1n the high-dose  females.
    1,2-Olphenylhydrazlne also  was tumorlgenlc  In  rats and  mice In  Inade-
quately  reported  chronic  oral,   subcutaneous   and  dermal   cardnogenlcHy
studies (PUss,  1974),  and  produced positive responses  1n  a  Strain A mouse
pulmonary  tumor  assay  (Haronpot et al., 1986)  (see  Section 6.2.).  1,2-01-
phenylhydrazlne   was  not  tumorlgenlc  when  administered  to  rats by subcuta-
neous   Injection at an average dose  of 60 mg once a week  for life  (total  dose
6.4 g)  (Spitz et al.,  1950).
    Based  primarily on  the carcinogenic responses  In   the  rats  and  mice  In
the NCI (1978) bloassay, 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne 1s classified as an EPA Group
Bl carcinogen (U.S.  EPA, 1987a).
    The NCI  (1978)  bloassay provides a basis  for  derivation  of an F  factor
for 1,2-dlphenylhydrazlne  because   U  1s  the  only  adequate  cardnogenlcHy
study  and was  used  for  derivation  of a  verified q^ (U.S.  EPA,   1980b,
1987a).   Using   the  Incidence  data for  hepatocellular carcinoma  and  neo-
plastlc nodules  In  the  liver  In  male  rats and  the computerized  multistage
linear  model  adopted by the U.S.  EPA (Howe and  Crump,  1982),  the  unadjusted


0075d                               -32-                            05/11/88

-------
1/ED10  Is  calculated  to  be  0.72  (mg/kg/day)"i  (Table  9-4).   Multiplying
by  the  cube  root  of the  ratio  of reference  human body weight  (70 kg)  to
measured rat  body  weight (0.38 kg) results  In an  F  factor  of 4.1.  This  F
factor  Indicates   that   !,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne  should  be  placed  In  Potency
Group 2.  A Potency  Group 2 and an  EPA  Group  Bl  chemical  has  a Medium hazard
ranking under  CERCLA.  A Medium hazard ranking Is assigned an  RQ of  10.
0075d                               -33-                             05/11/88

-------
                                  TABLE 9-4
          Derivation of Potency Factor (F) for 1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne
Reference:
Exposure route:
Species:
Strain:
Sex:
Vehicle or physical state:
Body weight:
Duration of treatment:
Duration of study:

Llfespan of animal:

Target organ:
Tumor type:

Experimental doses/exposures:
Transformed doses (mg/kg/day)
Tumor Incidence:
Unadjusted 1/ED10:
Adjusted 1/ED10 (F Factor):
NCI, 1978
oral
rat
F344
male
diet
0.38 kg (measured)
78 weeks
108-109 weeks (control), 107 weeks (low
dose), 106 weeks (high dose)
108-109 weeks (control), 107 weeks (low
dose), 106 weeks (high dose)
liver
hepatocellular carcinoma and neoplastlc
nodules
OX, 0.008%, 0.03X
0, 2.92, 11.04
6/95*. 13/49, 37/49
0.721407 (mg/kg/day)'1
4.1047356 (mg/kg/day)"1
*Pooled Incidences from low dose control  and high dose control  groups
00750
  -34-
12/10/87

-------
                               10.  REFERENCES







Buccafusco  R.J.,  S.J.  Ells  and  G.A.  LeBlanc.    1981.   Acute  toxlclty  of



priority  pollutants   to  blueglll   (Lepomls  macrochlrus).   Environ.  Contam.



Toxlcol.  26(4):  446-452.







Callahan,  H.A.,   M.W.  Sllmak,  N.W.  Gabel,  et  al.    1979.   Water-Related



Environmental  Fate  of  129  Priority Pollutants.   Vol.  2.  Office  of  Water



Planning  and Standards,  Office  of Water  and  Waste  Management,  U.S.  EPA,



Washington, DC.  EPA 440/4-79-029b.  p.  104-1  to  104-9.







Dunkel  V.C.,  E.  Zelger,  D.  Bruslck,  et  al.   1985.    Reproduc1b1lHy  of



mlcroblal mutagenlcHy  assays.   II. Testing  of  carcinogens and noncardno-



gens  In  Salmonella   typh1mur1um  and  EscheMchla  coll.   Environ.  Mutagen.



7(Suppl. 5): 1-12, 15-19,  37.







Dutklewlcz  T.  and  J.  Szymanska.   1973.   Chromatographlc  determination  of



hydrazobenzene  metabolites   In  rats.   Bromatol.  Chem.   Toksykol.   6(3):



323-327.  (CA 80:116838k)







Genln  V.A.,  A.G.  Medvedovskll  and V.M.  Voronln.   1975.   Increase of   the



carcinogenic  activity  during   the  joint  effect  of  hydrazobenzene   and



benzldlne sulfate.  G1g. Tr. prof.  Zabol.   6:  28-31.   (CA  83:173640a)







Great Lakes Water  Quality Board.  1983.   An Inventory of  Chemical Substances



Identified In the Great Lakes Ecosystem.  Report.  Great Lakes Water Quality



Board, Windsor Ontario, Canada,   p.  17.









0075d                               -35-                            12/10/87

-------
Hansch,  C.  and  A.J.  Leo.   1985.   Medchem  Project,  Issue  No.  26.   Pomona



College, Claremont, CA.







Mauser,  T.R.  and  S.H.  Bromberg.   1982.   EPA's  monitoring  program at Love



Canal 1980.   Environ.  MonH.  Assess.   2:  249-271.







Haworth,  S.,   T.   Lawlor.  K.  Mortelmas,  W.  Speck  and  E.  Zelger.    1983.



Salmonella  mutagenlclty  test  rules   for  250 chemicals.   Environ. Mutagen.



5(Suppl. 1): 21,  38,  38,  51,  102.







Howe,  R.B.  and  K.S.  Crump.   1982.    GLOBAL  82.   A  Computer  Program   to



Extrapolate  Quantal Animal Toxldty Data  to  Low Doses.   Prepared  for  Office



of   Carcinogen   Standards.    OSHA,  U.S.   Dept.   of  Labor.   Contract   No.



41USC252C3.







HSDB  (Hazardous  Substances  Data Bank).   1987.   On-line:  10/19/87.  CAS  No.



122-66-7.







IARC  (International Agency  for  Research on Cancer).  1972.   IARC  Monographs



on  the  Evaluation  of Carcinogenic Risk  of  Chemicals  to  Han.   Benzldlne.



IARC, WHO, Lyons, France.  Vol.  1,  p.  80-86.







IARC  (International Agency for Research on Cancer).  1974.   Monograph  on  the



Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk  of  Chemicals  to  Han.   Hydrazlne and  Its



Derivatives.  IARC, WHO,  Lyons,  France.  Vol.  4,  p.  127-136.
0075d                               -36-                             12/10/87

-------
Kurlyandskll,  B.A.,  A.G.  Medvedovskll,  V.A.  Genln,  V.M.  Voronln  and  P.O.



MashbHs.    1976.   Experimental  study  on   the  combined   effect  of   some



dlphenylamlno  derivatives  with  regard  to  the  prevention  of  occupational



urinary  bladder  growths.   Gig.  Tr.  Prof.  Zabol.    20(5):   34-38.    (CA



85:105041x)







LeBlanc, G.A.   1980.   Acute toxlclty  of  priority  pollutants  to water  flea



(Daphnla maqna).  Bull.  Environ.  Contain.  Toxlcol.   24(5): 684-691.







Lyman,  W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl and  D.H.  Rosenblatt.  1982.   Handbook of Chemical



Property Estimation  Methods.   Environmental  Behavior  of Organic Compounds.



McGraw-Hill Book Co..  New York.   p.  2-14.







Malaney, G.W.   1960.   Oxldatlve  abilities  of aniline-acclimated  activated



sludge.  J. Hater Pollut. Control Fed.   32:  1300-1311.







Maronpot R.R., M.B. Shlmkln, H.P. Wltschl, L.H. Smith and  J.M.  Cllne.   1986.



Strain  A mouse  pulmonary tumor  test  results  for chemicals  previously  tested



1n  the National  Cancer  Institute  cardnogenldty  tests.   J.  Natl.   Cancer



Inst.  76(6): 1101-1112.







NCI  (National  Cancer  Institute).   1978.   Bloassay  of  Hydrazobenzene  for



Possible Carc1nogen1c1ty.  NCI Carclnogenesls Tech. Rep. Ser.  No. 92.   [Also



published as NIH 78-1342.]







NIOSH  (National  Institute  for Occupational Safety and Health).   1987.   RTECS



(Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances).  Online: Oct. 1987.   CAS



No. 122-66-7.





0075d                               -37-                             12/10/87

-------
Pllss, G.B.   1974.   Carcinogenic properties of  hydrazobenzene.   Vop.  Onkol.



20: 53.  (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1980a,  1981)







Randall,  T.L.  and  P.V.  Knopp.   1980.   Detoxification  of  specific  organic



substances   by  wet  oxidation.   J.  Water  Pollut.   Control   Fed.    52(8):



2117-2130.







Rlggln, R.M.  and  C.C.  Howard.   1979.  Determination of  benzldlne,  dlchloro-



benzldlne,  and dlphenylhydrazlne In aqueous media by high performance  liquid



chromatography.  Anal.  Chem.  51: 210-214.







Schafer  E.H.,  Jr.  and  W.A.  Bowles,  Jr.   1985.   Acute oral  toxlclty  and



repellency  of  933 chemicals to  house and deer mice.   Arch. Environ.  Contam.



Toxlcol.   14(1):  111-129.







Seller,  J.P.   1977.   Inhibition of  testlcular  DMA  synthesis  by  chemical



mutagens  and carcinogens.   Preliminary  results  In  the  validation of a  novel



short term test.   Mutat.  Res.   46:  305-310.







Shabad,  L.H.  and V.A.  Genln.    1975.   Combined  action  of  amlno-substltuted



blphenyls causing bladder tumors.  Urol.  Nefrol.   1:  38-42.   (CA 83:127207s)







Shlzuka,  H.,  H.  Kayoljl and  T. MorHa.   1970.   The photolysis  of  hydrazo-



benzene In  solution.  Mol.  Photochem.   2:  165-176.







Spitz, S.,  W.H. Hagulgaw and K.  Dobrlner.   1950.  The  carcinogenic  action of



benzldlne.   Cancer.   3: 789-804.









0075d                               -38-                             03/08/88

-------
SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1987.  Directory of  Chemical  Producers.
United States  of  America.   SRI  International,  Menlo Park, CA.   p.  604,  773,
777.

Tabak, H.H., S.A.  Quave,  C.I.  Mashnl and E.F. Barth.   1981.   B1odegradab1l-
Ity  studies  with  organic  priority  pollutant  compounds.   J.  Water  Pollut.
Control Fed.  53:  1503-1518.

U.S.  EPA.   1978.   In-depth  Studies  on Health and  Environmental Impacts  of
Selected Water  Pollutants.  Contract  No. 68-01-4646.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,
1980a)

U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Ambient  Water  Quality Criteria  for  D1phenylhydraz1ne.
Prepared by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH
for  the  Office of Water  Regulations  and  Standards,  Washington,  .DC.   EPA
440/5-80-062.

U.S.  EPA.   1980b.  Guidelines  and   Methodology  Used  In  the Preparation  of
Health  Effects Assessment  Chapters of   the  Consent  Decree Water  Criteria
Documents.   Federal Register.  45(231): 49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.  1981.   CHIP  (Chemical  Hazard  Information Profile).   Draft Report.
Hydrazobenzene.  OTS,  OPTS. U.S. EPA, Washington.  DC.
0075d                               -39-                             03/08/88

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1984.   Methodology  and   Guidelines   for   Reportable   Quantity
Determinations  Based  on  Chronic Toxldty  Data.   Prepared  by  the Office  of
Health  and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment
Office, Cincinnati, OH for the Office  of Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response,
Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1985.   Reference  Values for  Risk Assessment.   Prepared by  the
Office  of  Health  and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for  the  Office of Solid  Waste,  Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Methodology  for  Evaluating Carc1nogen1c1ty 1n Support  of
Reportable Quantity Adjustment  Pursuant to CERCLA Section  102.   Prepared  by
the  Office  of  Health and  Environmental  Assessment,  Carcinogen  Assessment
Group, Washington,  DC  for  the Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response,
Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Graphical  Exposure  Modeling  System  (GEMS)  Fate  of  Atmo-
spheric Pollutants (FAP).  Office of Toxic  Substances. Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1987a.    IRIS   (Integrated   Risk   Information  System),   CRAVE
(Carcinogen Risk  Assessment  Validation Endeavor)  for  1,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne.
Online:  Verification   date:  10/29/86.   Office  of  Health  and  Environmental
Assessment,  Environmental Criteria  and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

U.S.  EPA.   1987b.   Reportable  Quantity   Adjustments.    Federal   Register.
52(50): 5139.


0075d                               -40-                             03/08/88

-------
USITC  (U.S.  International Trade  Commission).   1984.   Imports  of  Benzenold



Chemicals and Products:  1983.   USITC Publ.  1548, Washington,  DC.   p.  19.







USITC  (U.S.  International Trade  Commission).   1986.   Imports  of  Benzenold



Chemicals and Products:  1985.   USITC Publ.  1892, Washington,  DC.







Weast,  R.C.,  Ed.  1985.   CRC Handbook  of Chemistry and  Physics,  66th  ed.



CRC Press, Boca Raton, PL.  p. c-313.







Yoon, J.S., J.H. Mason,  R.  Valencia,  R.C.  Woodruff and S. Zlmmerlng.   1985.



Chemical  mutagenesls  testing  In DrosophHa.   IV.  Results of  45  coded  com-



pounds  tested  for  the National  Toxicology  Program.  Environ Mutagen.   7(3):



349-367.
0075d                               -41-                             03/08/88

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE  SEARCHED



    This  HEED  1s  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:

              CHEMLINE
              TSCATS
              CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status  Report)
              TOXLINE
              TOXLIT
              TOXLIT 65
              RTECS
              OHM TADS
              STORET
              SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
              SANSS
              AQUIRE
              TSCAPP
              NTIS
              Federal Register
              CAS ONLINE (Chemistry and Aquatic)
              HSDB


These searches  were conducted In  October  1987, and the  following  secondary

sources were reviewed:
    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyg1en1sts).
    1986.  Documentation  of the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices. 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1987.  TLVs:  Threshold  Limit  Values for Chemical  Substances  1n  the
    Work   Environment  adopted  by   ACGIH   with   Intended  Changes   for
    1987-1988.  Cincinnati,  OH.  114 p.

    Clayton,  G.O.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton,  G.D.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  28.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 2879-3816.

    Clayton,  G.D.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2C.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 3817-5112.
0075d                               -42-                             03/08/88

-------
    Grayson,  M.  and  0. Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.  Klrk-Othmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of  Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.  John Wiley and  Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton,  A. and H.L. Hardy.  1974.   Industrial Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group,  Inc.,  Littleton,  MA.   575  p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on Cancer).   IARC  Mono-
    graphs on   the   Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk  of  Chemicals   to
    Humans.   IARC,  MHO, Lyons.  France.

    Jaber, H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  L1eu,  T.W.  Chou  and H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data  acquisition   for  environmental  transport   and  fate
    screening  for compounds  of  Interest  to  the Office  of Solid Waste.
    EPA  600/6-84-010.    NTIS  PB84-243906.    SRI   International,   Menlo
    Park, CA.

    NTP  (National Toxicology Program).   1987.  Toxicology Research  and
    Testing   Program.   Chemicals  on   Standard  Protocol.    Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,   R.P.  and  J.A.   King.    1977.    Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.   McGraw-Hill  Book  Co.,  NY.

    Sax. I.N.   1984.   Dangerous Properties of Industrial  Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van  Nostrand Relnhold  Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1987.    Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.   Menlo Park.  CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.  Report  on Status  Report  In  the  Special Review
    Program,   Registration   Standards   Program  and   the   Data  Call   In
    Programs.   Registration  Standards  and  the  Data  Call  In  Programs.
    Office of  Pesticide Programs,  Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.   International   Trade   Commission).    1986.    Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S. Production  and Sales,  1985,  USITC  Publ.
    1892, Washington, DC.

    Verschueren, K.   1983.   Handbook of  Environmental  Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals,  2nd ed.   Van Nostrand  Relnhold Co., NY.

    Worthing,  C.R.  and S.B. Walker, Ed.   1983.  The Pesticide  Manual.
    British  Crop Protection Council.  695 p.

    Wlndholz,  M., Ed.  1983.  The Merck  Index,  10th ed.   Merck and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway. NJ.
0075d                               -43-                             03/08/88

-------
    In addition,  approximately 30  compendia of  aquatic  toxlclty data  were

reviewed,  Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data   Book.    Volume  3.   Effects   of   Chemicals   on   Aquatic   Life.
    Selected Data  from the Literature  through  1968.   Prepared for  the
    U.S.  EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.   Washington.  DC.

    Johnson, W.W.  and  M.T. Flnley.   1980.   Handbook  of  Acute  Toxlclty
    of Chemicals  to   Fish and  Aquatic  Invertebrates.   Summaries   of
    Toxlclty Tests  Conducted  at  Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.    1965-1978.    U.S.  Oept.   Interior,  Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv.  Res.  Publ.  137,  Washington,  DC.

    HcKee, J.E.  and H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water Quality Criteria, 2nd  ed.
    Prepared  for  the   Resources   Agency   of  California,  State   Water
    Quality Control Board.   Publ.  No.  3-A.

    Plmental, 0.  1971.  Ecological Effects  of  Pesticides on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared  for the U.S.  EPA, Washington,  DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider,  B.A.  1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.   Book 1: Toxicology  Data.   Office  of  Pesticide  Programs, U.S.
    EPA,  Washington,  DC.  EPA 540/9-79-003.   NTIS  PB  80-196876.
0075d                               -44-                             03/08/88

-------
                                  APPENDIX B

          Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|* for Oral Exposure!"
Compound:

Reference:

Species, strain, sex:

Body weight:

Length of exposure (le):

Length of experiment (Le)

Llfespan of animal (L):

Tumor site and type:


Route, vehicle:
 1,2-d1phenylhydraz1ne

 NCI,  1978

•rat,  F344,  male

 0.38  kg (measured)

 78 weeks

 104 weeks

 104 weeks

 liver,  hepatocellular carcinoma  and neoplastlc
 nodules

 oral,  diet
                  Dose
               (mq/kg/day)

                    0
                    4
                   15
                Incidence
        No.  Responding/No.  Tested

                   6/95
                  13/49
                  37/49
Human q-j* = 0.768 (mg/kg/day)'1
^Parameters  reported   by  U.S.   EPA   (1980a);   see  text   for   additional
 Information.   Le  was  reported  to be  107 weeks  (low dose)  and  106  weeks
 (high dose) by NCI (1978).
0075d
        -45-
03/08/88

-------
o
o
-J
in
a.
                                                                             APPENDIX C



                                                               Sunary Table for  1.2-Dlphenylhydraztne
CO


CO

CO

Inhalation Exposure
Subchronlc
Chronic
Carctnogenlctty
Oral Exposure
Subchronlc
Chronic
Carclnogentclty
RE PORT ABLE QUANTITIES
Based on chronic toxtclty:
Based on carctnogentclty:
Species Exposure Effect RfO or qj* Reference

NA NA NA RfD - NA NA
NA NA NA RfO = NA NA
rat NA NA q!*:0.8 (ag/kg/dayf>t NA

NA NA NA RfO = NA NA
NA NA NA RfO = NA NA
rat 0.008 and 0.03% In hepatocellular carcinoma q^: 0.8 (og/kg/day)"1 NCI. 1978
diet for 78 weeks and 'neoplasttc nodules
In liver

100
10
tlhe oral qi* was  adopted  as  the  Inhalation


NA = Not applicable
                                                           (U.S. EPA.  1987a)

-------