FINAL DRAFT
              United States                                    ECAO-CIN-P224
              Erv/iror.rremai ?rctsc::on '                             April. 1987
              Agency
&EPA       Research  and
               Development
               HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFF.ECTS PROFILE
               FOR 2-METHOXYETHANOL  ACETATE
              Prepared for
               OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE AND
               EMERGENCY RESPONSE
              Prepared by
              Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
              Office of Health and  Environmental  Assessment
              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Cincinnati, OH  45268
                          DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
                                  NOTICE

           This document Is a preliminary draft.  It has not been formally released
        by the  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and should not at this stage be
        construed to represent Agency policy.  It Is being circulated for comments
        on Its technical accuracy and policy Implications.

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  is  an external draft  for  review purposes only  and  does  not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention  of  trade names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      II

-------
                                    PSEFACE
    Health  and  Environmental  Effects  Profiles  (HEEPs)  are prepared  for  the
Office  of  Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response  by the  Office  of Health  and
Environmental  Assessment.   The  HEEPs  are  intended   to  support listings  of
hazardous constituents  of  a wide  range  of  waste streams  under  Section  3001
of  the  Resource  Conservation  and Recovery Act  (RCRA).  as  well  as  to provide
health-related limits for  emergency actions under Section  1.01  of. the Compre-
hensive  Environmental   Response,  .Compensation  and   Liability  Act  (CERCLA).
3cth  published  1-Heraturs  and   information  obta-lned   from  Agency  program
or'fice  files  are  evaluated  as  they   pertain   to   potential  human  health,
aquatic life.and environmental effects  of hazardous  waste, constituents.   The
literature  searched  and   the  dates of  the  searches  are  included  in  the
action- l.1l.led  "Appendix:  Literature  Searched."    The  literature  search
material Is current through November,  1985.

    Quantitative  estimate's  are   presented   provided  sufficient  .data   are
available.   For systemic toxicants, these Include Reference  doses  (RfDs)  for
chronic exposures.   An  RfO is defined  as  the. amount of a cnemical  to  which
humans  can  be  exposed  on  a dally  basis over  an.extended  period  of  time
(usually a lifetime) without suffering  a  deleterious .effect.   In the case of
suspected  carcinogens.  RfDs  are  not   estimated  in  this  document  series.
Instead, a  carcinogenic potency  factor  of  q-|*  Is   provided.   These  potency
estimates are derived for  both oral and  Inhalation exposures  where  possible.
In  addition,  unit  risk estimates  for  air and  drinking water  are  presented
based on inhalation and  oral data, respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs)  based  on both  chronic  toxldty  and cardno-
genlcity are derived.   The  RQ 1s  used  to  determine  the quantity of  a hazard-
ous substance  for  which notification  Is  required  In the event  of  a release
as  specified under CERCLA.   These two  RQs (chronic  toxldty  and carcinogen-
Iclty)  represent  two of  six scores  developed .(the remaining  four  reflect
Ignltablllty, reactivity,  aquatic toxldty and acute  mammalian toxldty).

    The  first  draft  of.  this  document  was   prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation  under  EPA  Contract  No.   68-03-3228.    The  document was  subse-
quently  revised  after  reviews   by staff  within the Office  of Health  and
Environmental Assessment:  Carcinogen  Assessment Group.  Reproductive Effects
Assessment  Group,  Exposure Assessment  Group, and the Environmental Criteria
and Assessment Office In Cincinnati.

    The HEEPs will  become  part of the EPA RCRA and CERCLA dockets.
                                      111

-------
                               cXECUTIVE.SUMMARY

    2-Methoxyethanol acetate,  also  known  as  ethylene  glycol  monomethyl  ether
acetate,  Is  a colorless  liquid  at  room  temperature,  with a  sweet,  pleasant
odor.    It   Is   mlsdble  with  water  and  many   common   organic   solvents
(Verschueren, 1983;  Hawley,  1981).   Etnylene qlycol monomethyl  ether,  formed
by reacting  ethylene oxide  and anhydrous  methanol,  Is  esterlfled with'acetic
acid  to  produce  2-,nethoxyei.nanol   acetate   (U.S.  EPA,  1982).   As  o:  1934,
Union Carbide Corp., South  Charleston,  WV, was  the sole U.S.  manufacturer of
2-methoxyethanol  acetate.   The  current   U.S.   production  volume  for  this
chemical  Is  unavailable.
    The  primary  use of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  1s  as a solvent  for  oils,
greases.  Inks,   gums,  resins,  plastics,   adhesive*,  waxes,  nitrocellulose,
cellulose acetate  and  other  cellulose  esters and  ethers.   2-Methoxyethano.l
acetate  Is   also  used  In  the manufacture of  lacquers, enamels,  adheslves,
photographic film and 1n- the  textile printing Industry  (U.S.  EPA, 1982).
    If  released  to  water,  the  primary  processes that  may  remove  2-methoxy-
ethanol  are  hydrolysis  and blodegradatlon (Lyman  et  al.,  1982).  Bloaccumu-
latlon  In aquatic organisms and  adsorption to  suspended solids  and  sediments
should  not  be  significant.   The compound Is expected  to  persist  In  aquatic
media.   If  released to   the atmosphere, 2-methoxyethanol acetate Is  expected
to  exist primarily  In  the  vapor  phase  and  Is  apparently  susceptible  to
oxidation by HO radical  (t]/2=22.42  hours)   (Yanaglhara  et  al.. 1977;  U.S.
EPA.  1986b).  Removal  from  the  atmosphere   by  wet  deposition  may also  be
significant.  If released  to  soil,  2-methoxyethanol acetate  should  be highly
mobile  In  moist  soils   and   may   volatilize  significantly  from  dry  soil
surfaces.  This  compound may  be degraded In  moist soils by  hydrolysis  and
blodegradatlon.

                                      1v

-------
     Limixsu monitorinu and  exposure  uaia ryqurdinq  'i-ineihoxye.thano 1  dcsiate
 were located In the available  literature.   2-Methoxyethanol  ace.tate  has  been
 qualitatively  Identified  in drinking  water (Kaol  et  al.,  1982)  and in  an
 effluent discharged  into  the  Illinois  River  (Somani et  al.,  1980.).  It  is
 likely  that consumer  exposure  to  this  compound will occur during  the  use  of
 cleaning solutions,  paint,  ink  and nail  polish  '.U.S.  EPA,'1982).
     Potential  routes of 2--nethoxyethanol acetate  exposure  to workers  include
 inhalation   of  the  vapor,   ingescion  and  eye  and  sicLn  contact   (U.S.  EPA,.
 1982).    A   1972-1974'  National  Occupational  Hazard  Survey  estimated  that'
 436,989 workers are occupationally  exposed  to  this  compound during  manufac-
 turing,  processing,  use  and  handling  of   2-methoxyethanol  acetate  (RTECS,
 1984).    A  more recent survey,  the  National  Occupational .Exposure  Survey,
 estimates  that  2024 workers are  exposed  to  2-methoxyethanol  acetate;  how-
 ever,  this  figure  does not1 reflect exposure to  tradename  products  containing.
 2-methoxyethanol acetate  (NIOSH,  1985).
     Little   Information  Is.  available concerning  effects of  2-methoxyethanol.
 acetate  on  aquatic  organisms.   LC... 'values  of  40, 45  and  190  mg/i  were
 reported for  tidewater  sllversldes,   bluegllls   (Oawson  et al.,  1977)  and
 goldfish (Bridie,et  al..  1979a),respectively.
     Data related  to  the  pharmacokinetics  of   2-methoxyethanol  acetate  are
 very limited.   From toxlcity studies, absorption  of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate
 through the skin,  lung and gastrointestinal tract  as well  as general distri-
 bution   throughout  the body  can  be  Inferred.   2-Methoxyethanol   acetate  Is
 most likely  hydrolyzed to  2-methoxyethanol (Stott  and McKenna,   1985;  Oahl
 and  Hadley, 1983;  Hoffman,  1984;  Browning,  1965). although  there  were no J_n
.vivo data  available  to  support  this   conclusion.   No  excretion  data  were
 available.

-------
     No   information  ;s  availaoie  regarding  cither, the  care: noyenicl iy  or
 teratogenlcity  of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate In animals or humans.  2-Methoxy-
 ethanol  acetate  reportedly  caused  aneuploldy.  In  yeast (Zimmerman  et  al.,
 1985).  but  there Is considerable doubt  as  to the .relevance of these data to
 actual  genotoxldty.
     The  only  study  that  demonstrates   the  In'  vivo  toxlclty  of  2-methoxy-
 ethanol  acetate was  conducted, by  Nagano  et al.  (1979),  who  treated  male
 MCL-ICS  ,irice  at oral, doses' or  bZ.5, ".25, 250, 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg/day, 5
 days/week  for  5  weeks.   Significant   decreases  In  testkular weight, and
 substantial  atrophy  were  observed  In  animals  receiving  >500 mg/kg..   In
 addition,  leukopenla  was  evident In mice  In  the 1000 and 2000 mg/kg groups.
 No  effects  were observed  at <250  mg/kg/day.   Thes.e responses  were similar
 qualitatively  and  quantitatively  (on  a molar  basis),  to  those  Induced  by
 2-methoxyethanol 1n the same study.
     Oral  LD5Q  values  for' 2-methoxyethanol acetate  range  from  1.25  g/kg 1n
 guinea  pigs  to  ,3.93  g/kg  1n  rats (Smyth et al.,  1941).. Similar results were
 obtained  following  subcutaneous  Injection  (Smyth  et  al., 1941;  Flury  and
 Wlrth,  1933).   Kidney lesions were common  following  these exposures.  Three
'repeated   8-hour.  Inhalation -exposures  of   1000 .  ppm  (4831  mg/m3) .were
 generally  lethal  to  cats,  rabbits,  guinea   pigs  and  mice  (Gross,  1938).
 Humans  were  unable  to  tolerate exposure  to 1000  ppm  (4831 mg/m3)  for  1
 hour,  while a  level  of  120 ppm (580   mg/m3)  for  3 minutes  "provided good
 warning properties" (Union Carbide, 1958).
     An  Inhalation  study by Miller et  al. (1982)  was used by U.S. EPA (1986c)
 to  derive  an RfD  for  2-methoxyethanol.   This  RfD was  based on  a  NOEL for
 both  developmental  and  testlcular  effects.   Since  2-methoxyethanol acetate
 Is  metabolized  to  2-methoxyethanol  and   the  Nagano  et  al.  (1979)  study

-------
     veti srfsc^s  quantitativeiy  :nd  qualitatively  -ifnilir (an ^ -ioi£r basi;}
for both compounds, an  RfD  of  0.002  mg/kg/day or 0.11 mg/day for .a 70 kg man
is  proposed  based on  analogy  to  2-methoxyethanol.   A CS of  23  and  an RQ of
100 were derived  from a chronic  human  MED  of 28 mg/day based on neurochemi-
cal alterations  in offspring  of  male rats exposed  to 25 ppm  (78  mg/m3) of
2-methoxyethanol,  7  hours/day  for  6  weeks  In  the   study  by Nelson • et  al.
(1984).   To   calculate   the  MED,    the  exposure   level   of  78  mg/m3 .of
2-methox.yethar,ol  was  adjusted to  121  mg/m3  for 2-methoxyethanol  acetate.
In  terms  of. carcinogenic  potential,  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  Is classified
as .a  U.S.  EPA Group  D  chemical,  meaning there  is Inadequate evidence or in
this  case   no  existing  data  regarding the  human  carcinogeniclty  of   this
compound.

-------
                              TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	    1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	    1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA.	  .  2
    1.4.   USE DATA	    2
    1.5.   SUMMARY	    4

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT PROCESSES	    5

    2.1.   WATER.	'.....	    5

           2.1.1..   Hydrolysis	 . .  .    5
           2.1.2.    H1crob1al  Degradation '	    5
         ,  2.1.3.    Transport	    6
                               i          •          f
    2.2.   AIR.	'.....'...'	    6
    2.3.   SOIL	,	 . •	    7

           2.3.'l.    Hydrolysis. .....'	...'..'..    7
           2.3.2.    Leaching	. .  .  .  ; .	    7
           2.3.3.    Volatilization. ...,.........,.:..    7

    2.4.   SUMMARY.	    7

3.  EXPOSURE		    9

4.  PHARMACOKINETCS ...:....	'..'..'	  .   10

    4.1.   ABSORPTION 	 ::....	   10
    4.2;   DISTRIBUTION	:	   10
    4.3.   METABOLISM ....... J .:.'. 1	   10.
    4.4.   EXCRETION.	   11
    4.5.   SUMMARY.	   11

5.  EFFECTS	,  .   12

    5.1.   CARCINOGENICITY. .	•	   12
    5.2.   MUTAGENICITY ....:.	   12
    5.3.   TERAT.OGENICITY	   12
    5.4.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE  EFF.ECTS	   13
    5.5. '  CHRONIC AND SUBCHRONIC TOXICITY	   13
    5.6.   OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION .   . .	   14
    5.7.   SUMMARY.  ...... 	   16
                                    vin

-------
                           TABL;  OF  CONTENTS  (cent.)

                                                                        Page

 6.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	   18

     6.1.   ACUTE	:  . .  ..	   18
     6.2.   CHRONIC	   18
     6.3.   PLANTS	   18.
     6.4.   RESIDUES .  .  .  '	  .   18
     6.5.   SUMMARY.	,	   18

 7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS	'	   19

     7.1.   HUMAN	 .. .	   19
     7.2.  ..AQUATIC	 .	   19

 8..  RISK ASSESSMENT .	V	   20

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES.. .......	.••••.  22

     9.1.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITY (RQ) RANKING BASED ON CHRONIC
            TOXICITY ......	 . .	   22
     9.2.   HEIGHT OF EVIDENCE AND POTENCY FACTOR ,(F=1/ED10).
            FOR CARCINOGENI CITY. .......	   25

10. 'REFERENCES. .:..'.........'	,  .   27

APPENDIX: LITERATURE  SEARCHED. ........  '.	   34
                                      1x

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

No.                               Title                                Page

1-1     U.S. Manufacturers and Importers  of 2-Methoxyethanol
        Acetate for 1977 ........................     3
5-1     Acute Toxldty of 2-Methoxyethanol  Acetate
9-1     .Oral Toxlcity Summary for 2-Methoxyethanol  Acetate Using
        Male JCL-ICR Mice ...................  ...    24

9-2     Compos Ue Scores for 2-Methoxyethanol  Acetate ........    25

9-3     Minimum. Effective Dose (MED)  and Reportable Quantity (RQ)  .  .    27

-------
                             LIST CF  /.GBREVIATIONS

ADI                     Acceptable dally Intake
BOO                     Biochemical oxygen demand
CNS                     Central nervous system
COD                     Chemical oxygen demand
CS                      Composite scare
ONA                     Deoxyr Ibonucleic acid
Koc                     So1l:sorptlon coefficient
Kow                     OctanoV water partition coefficient
LC5Q                    Median lethal concentra.tlon
LD5Q                    Median lethal dose
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MED                     llnlmum effective dose
MLD                     Minimum lethal dose
NOAEL                   Yo-observed-adverse-effect level
NOEL                    »lo-observed-effect level
PEL                     Permissible exposure level
ppm                     Parts per million
RfD                     Reference dose
RQ                      Reportable quar.tHy
RVd                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
ThOD                    Theoretical oxygen demand
TLV                     Threshold limit value
                                       xl

-------
                                : .   INTRODUCTION
 1.1.    STRUCTURE  AND  CAS NUMBER
     2-Methoxyethanol   acetate   is  also  known  as  2-methoxyethyl . acetate,
 ethylene  glycol  monomethyl  ether  acetate,  acetyl   methyl   cellosolve • and
 methyl   cellosolve  acetate.   The  structure,  molecular ' weight,  empirical
 formula and  CAS  Registry number  for 2-methoxyethahol acetate are as Follows:

                             CH3-C-0-CH2-CH2-0-CH3 .
 Molecular  weight:   118.13
.Empirical  formula:  c5H1Q0'j
 CAS  Registry  number:   110-49-6
 1.2.    PHYSICAL  AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
     2-Methoxyethanol  acetate  Is  a colorless liquid at room temperature, with
 a  sweet,  pleasant  odor  (Verschueren, 1983;  Hawley,  1981).   It  Is mlsclble
 with  common  organic  solvents   and   1s  Incompatible  with nitrates,   strong
 oxldlzers.  strong  acids  and strong alkalies  (Hawley.  1981;  U.S.  EPA,  1982).
 2-Methoxyethanol  acetate Is a moderate  fire hazard when  exposed to heat or
 flame  and. In .case of fire, will  form toxic gases.and vapors such as  carbon
 monoxide (Hawley.   1981;  U.S.  EPA,  1982).   Selected  physical  properties of
 2-methoxyethanol acetate are listed below.

      Melting  point:         -65.TC                 Union Carbide,  1979
      .Boiling  point:         145°C (760 mm  Hg)       Union Carbide,  1979
      Vapor pressure:        2 mm Hg  at 20°C         Union Carbide,  1979
      Hater solubility:      complete               Union Carbide,  1979
      Log  Kow:               0.12                    U.S.  EPA. 1986a
0858p                                -1-                               03/20/87

-------
           ' .dens 1 * v:
         (air=n
4.Q7
                                                .C.  cpa.
Specific gravity:
Refractive index,

Flashpoint:


TLV, air:
Conversion factors
in air:
                             1.0067 (20/20°C)
                             1,4019

                             12TF (49.4°C)
                             (closed cup)
                             132°F (55'.6°C
                             (open cup)
                             25 ppm (skin)
                             1  mg/m3 = 0.207 ppm
                             1  ppm = 4.83 mg/m3
                        Union  Carbide,  1979
                        Brown  et  al., .1980

                        Union  Carbide,.  1979
                        Brown  st  al., 1980

                        Sax, 1984
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    2-Methoxyethanol  acetate  is   produced   from  ethylene  glycol  monoethyl
ether,  by  first  reacting  ethylene  oxide  and  anhydrous  methanol  under  a
variety of  reaction conditions and  with  or  without  catalysts  such as caustic
soda  or  boron trlfluoride.   Monoethers of  dlethylene,  trlethylene  and poly-
ethylene glycols are by-products of  the  reaction.   The  ethylene glycol mono-
methyl ether  Is then esterified with  acetic add  to produce  2-methoxyethanol
acetate (U.S. EPA, 1982).
    Since  1984,   Union  Carbide  Corp.  (Chemicals  and  Plastic  01v.),  South
Charleston,  HV,   has  been  the only  U.S.  manufacturer of  2-methoxyethanol
acetate (USITC, 1985).   The  U.S.  manufacturers and  Importers of  this  chemi-
cal  in  1977  are  listed  In  Table  1-1.  -The current  production  volume  of
2-methoxyethanol acetate could not be located in the available literature.
1.4.   USE DATA
    2-Methoxyethanol  acetate  Is   used  primarily   as   a  solvent   for  oils,
greases.  Inks,  gums,  resins,  plastics, adheslves,  waxes,  nitrocellulose,
cellulose acetate and  other  cellulose  esters  and  ethers (U.S.  F.PA, 1982).
0858p
       -2-
                                                               03/20/87

-------
                                   TABLE  1-1

             U.S. Manufacturers and Importers of 2-Hethoxyethanol
                               Acetate for  1977*
       Company/Location
   . Manufacturer
    or Importer
Volume Produced
  or Imported
Union Carbide Corp.
  South Charleston, UV

CPS Chemical Co.
  Oldbrldge. NJ

Uglne Kuhlmann of America. .Inc,
  Paramus, NJ
    manufacturer'
    manufacturer
    Importer
 confidential


 none'5


 confidential
aSource: U.S. EPA, 1978

bTh1s company manufactured 2-methoxyethanol before 1977
0858p
-3-
       10/02/86

-------
 It  is  also usea  in  the texine priming  industry ana  in  ;he iTianuraciure or
 lacquers,  enamels, adhesives and photographic film (U.S. EPA. 1982).
     2-Methoxyethanol  acetate  is  used  in  a  resin/water  mixture  to  prevent
 discoloration  of dyes  of  thermoplastic  moldings;  for the  control  of  oil
 spills;  as a final  rinse  of resist patterns; as a  rinse, after  the electro-
 phoretic  coating  of  metals; In th'e  formation of  a  protective layer on X-ray
 intensifying  screens;   for  treating defective  lacquer  coatings  on  cars;  to
 Impart  stability to  organophosphate  Insecticides;  and  as  a stabilizer  to
 absorb nitrogen oxide's and  sulfur dioxide  in flue gas (U.S. EPA,  1982).
 1.5.   SUMMARY
     2-Methoxyethanol acetate,  also  known  as  ethylene glycol  monomethyl ether
 acetate,  is  a colorless liquid  at  room temperature, with a  sweet, pleasant
 odor.    It  is   mlscible  with, water  and   many   common   organic  solvents
 (Verschueren, 1983;  Hawley, 1981).   Ethylene glycol  monomethyl  ether; formed
 by reacting ethylene oxide  and  anhydrous  methanol.  Is  esterified with acetic
 acid  to  produce  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  (U.S.  EPA,  1982).   Since  1984,
 Union Carbide  Corp.,  South  Charleston, HV,  has been the  only  U.S. manufac-
 turer oF  2-methoxyethanol   acetate.   The  current U.S.  production  volume for
 this chemical is unavailable.
    The  primary  use of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  is  as a solvent  for  oils,
 greases,   inks,   g.ums,   resins,  plastics,   adhesives,  waxes,  nitrocellulose,
 cellulose  acetate  and   other  cellulose esters  and  ethers.   2-Methoxyethanol
 acetate  is also  used   in  the  manufacture of lacquers,  enamels,  adhesives,
 photographic film and in the textile printing industry  (U.S.  EPA, 1982).
0853p                                -4-                              10/02/86

-------
                2.  cM/lRONHEMTAL .FATE AMD TRANSPORT PROCESSES

    Pertinent   data   regarding   the   environmental   fate  and .transport  of
2-methoxyethanol acetate  in  water,  air and soil  could  not be located In the
available  literature   as  cited  in  the  Appendix.   When  possible,  physical'
properties anc  tne  limited  laboratory  studies  of  related compounds were used
to 'derive  Information on the environmental  fate  and transport  processes  of
•2-niethoxye':ri<;',Tji acetate.
2.1.   HATER
2.V.I.   Hydrolysis.   Carboxylic add  esters  are  potentially  susceptible  to
hydrolysis  (Lyman  et al.,  1982).   Based  on  the molecular   structure  of
2-methoxyethanol  acetate,  hydrolysis may  be  a potential  removal  process  In
the ambient environment;  however,  the  hydrolysis  half-lives of ethyl acetate
In water  at  25°C and  at  pHs of 7 and 9 were  estimated to be  2 years  and 7
days,   respectively   (Lyman   et  al.,  1982).    Therefore,  the  hydrolysis  of
2-methoxyethanol In  ambient water may be Important.
2.1.2.   Mlcroblal  Degradation.   Bridle  et  al.  (1979a)  conducted  a  5-day
BOD test on  2-methoxyethanol acetate In accordance  with the  American Public
Health Association  standard  dilution methods.   The  BOD  value determined was
0:49 g  O./g  compound,  which  Is  30X  of  the  theoretical  value.   This  BOD
value  suggests  that   2-methoxyethanol   acetate   Is slightly  to  moderately
biodegradable.   Analysis of  a 10-day  BOD value Indicates that during Incuba-
tion  of  200-1000  mg/l   2-methoxyethanol  acetate   In   acclimated  activated
sludge, removal was 15X,  suggesting  that  only  slight blbdegradatlon occurred
(Ludzack and Ettlnger, 1960).   In a  "dispersed  seed aeration"  study.  Mills
and Stack  (1954)  measured  a 10-day BOD of  1.1  g  0 /g  compound (68% ThOD).
0858p                               -5-                               10/02/86

-------
       suggests  that  ^degradation  was   significant.    The   importance  of
blodegradatlon  In  natural  waters  Is  uncertain  because  of.  the  conflicting
results  from  the BOO studies and the lack of natural water studies.
2.1.3.   Transport.
    2.1.3.1.   BIOACCUHULATION — The    complete    water    solubility    and
estimated  log K    value of  0.12  of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate suggest  that
significant  bloaccumulatlon  In aquatic  organisms  would  not  occur.   The  BCF
has  been  estimated   from  the  K    by  using   the  equation  (Lyman  et  al.,
1032):   log  BCF =  0.76 log  KQW  - 0.23.   The  calculated BCF  value  of  0.73
suggests'  Insignificant   bloaccumulatlon  of   2-methoxyethanol   acetate   in.
aquatic  organisms.
    2.1.3.2.   ADSORPTION — The  complete  water   solubility   and . .log   KQW
value  of  0.12  for   2-methoxyethanol  acetate  suggest   that  adsorption  to
particulate organic matter and sediment 1n water will not be significant.
    2.1.3.3.   VOLATILIZATION —Although the compound  has a  vapor  pressure
of  2  mm  Hg  at  ambient   temperatures,  H  Is  difficult  to  predict  Its
volatility from water because of Us complete misclbillty In water.
2.2.   AIR
    Because  of  Us vapor  pressure  (2 mm Hg  at 20°C) under  any  atmospheric
conditions  2-methoxyethanol   acetate   should  exist  primarily  In  the  vapor
phase.   The  compound  has  demonstrated moderate  reactivity  in smog  chamber
studies  In  which  It  was  Irradiated  by black lights  (Yanaglhara   et  al.,
1977).   The  estimated  rate  constant  for  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  reacting
with   photo-   chemically   generated-   HO    radical   Is    1.073X10'11   cm3
molecule'1  sec'1  at  25'C  (U.S.  EPA.   1986b).    Assuming  an .ambient  HO
radical  concentration  of  8.0xlOs  molecules  cm"3  (U.S.  EPA,  1986b),  the
HO  radical  reaction  half-life  has  been  estimated  to  be  22.42  hours.
2-Methoxyethanol acetate Is  predicted to  not  react with  ozone  (U.S.  EPA,

0858p                                6-                              04/27/87

-------
 i986b).   Considering  the ' complete  water  ioiuoillty  or  .ij-neihoxyeinanoi
acetate, removal from the atmosphere by wet deposition may be significant.
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1..  Hydrolysis.   Hydrolysis  of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate . may   be   a
potential  removal   process  particularly   In  moist  basic  soils  (see  Section
2.1.1.).
2.3.2.   Leaching.   The  '.complete .-water  solubility  .and   K    value   of
2-methoxyethahol  acetate  suggest  that  it  may  leach  reacily  in. tne  soil.
Using  the  molecular topology  and quantitative  structure-activity  relation-.
ship  analysis  method of  Sablj.lc  (1984), a  K    of  94  can  be  predicted  for
2-methoxyethanol  acetate,  Indicating high  soil   mobility   (Swann  et  al.,
1983).   2-Methoxyethanol  acetate may  be  removed  by   hydrolysis  In  moist
soils, where H Is expected to be highly  mobile.
2.3.3.   Volatilization.   n-Butyl  acetate undergoes  10054 weight  loss  In  8
minutes from glass  surfaces  during a standard  evaporation  test conducted  at
77°F  and  15%  relative  humidity  (Dow  Chemical  Co..  1981).   The  relative
evaporation  rate   (n-butyl  acetate=l) for  2-methoxyethanol  acetate   Is  0.3
(Smith, 1984),  which  suggests  that  2-methoxyethanol  would  evaporate  quite
rapidly from dry soil,  assuming no significant  adsorption to soil.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    In water,  the  two Important  processes  that may  remove  2-methoxyethanol
are hydrolysis  and  blodegradatlon (Lyman et al.,  1982.).   Bloaccumulatlon  In
aquatic organisms  and  adsorption to  suspended solids  and  sediments  should
not be  significant.   The -compound Is  expected to  persist  In  water.   In the
atmosphere.  2-methoxyethanol  acetate Is  expected  to exist  primarily  In the
vapor   phase  and   Is  apparently   susceptible   to   oxidation  by  HO  radical
0858p                               -7-                              04/27/87

-------
 •, t. .,-=
-------
                                 o.  EXPOSURE





    Limited monitoring  and  exposure data  regarding  2-methoxyethanol  acetate


were  located  in  the  available  literature.   2-Hethoxyethanol  acetate has been


qualitatively Identified  In drinking water  (Kool  et  al.,  1982)  and in efflu-


ents  discharged  into  the I.llinois  River  (Somani et  al.,  198C). ,  Consumer


exposure  to  this  compound  would  likely  occur  during  the  use  of  cleaning


solutions,  paint,  ink' and nail polish  that  contain  2-methoxyethanol  acetate


(U.S..EPA. 1982').


    Potential  routes  of  2-methoxyethanol.acetate  exposure to workers  Include


Inhalation  of the  vapor,  ingestlon _ arid  eye  and  skin  contact  (U.S.  EPA,


1982).   A  1972-1974  National Occupational   Hazard  .Survey  estimated  that

      '                     '      '               .                  •
436,989 workers  are  occupatlonally exposed to  this .compound during, manufac-


turing;  processing,   use  and  handling  of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  (RTECS,


1984).   A more  recent  survey,  the National  Occupational  Exposure  Survey,


estimates  that  2024  workers  are   exposed  to 2-methoxyethanol  acetate;  how-

                                               i                    ' •
ever, this  figure does not reflect exposure  to tradename, products containing


2-methoxyethanol  acetate  (NIOSH, 1985).
0858p                               -9-                              10/02/86

-------
                              4.  PHARMACOKINE7ICS
 4.1.   ABSORPTION
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  absorption  of   2-methoxyethanol  acetate
 could  not  be located  In  the available literature as  cited  In the Appendix.
 Systemic  toxldty  resulting  from  acute  exposures  (Chapter  .5),  however,
 suggests  that  absorption does occur  to some  extent  Following  oral.  Inhala-
 tion  or  dermal  exposure  to , 2-methoxyettianol  acetate.  Rowe  and  Wolf  (1982)
 stated  that  2-niethoxyethanol acetate  can  be  absorbed  through  the skin  with
 prolonged contact.
 4.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    Although  "little  Is   known  of  the specific  distribution  of  2-methoxy-
 ethanol acetate,  apparently.It Is  generally  distributed  throughout  the  body
 since  effects  In  the blood,  testes,  brain  and kidney  .have  been  reported
 following exposure.
 4.3.   METABOLISM
    The limited data  available concerning the metabolism of 2-methoxyethanol
 acetate pertain  only  to  \i\  vitro  experimentation.    Hoffman  (1984)  reported
 that 2-methoxyethanol  acetate  Is  readily  hy.drolyzed  by rat plasma esterases.
 A  half-life  of  -10  minutes  was  determined   for  the  acetate  In plasma  by
 gas-liquid  chromatography.   Stott  and  McKenna  (1985)  demonstrated  that
 2-methoxyethanol   acetate  was  a  relatively good  substrate for carboxyester-
 ases  present  In  mouse  nasal mucosa,  liver,  kidney, lung  and  blood.   In
 addition,   significant 2-methoxyethanol production   resulted  from Incubation
 of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  with   nasal  mucosal  carboxyesterase  from  rats,
 rabbits and  dogs.   Incubation of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  with nasal  and
 liver  mlcrosomes  from  rats did not  result In  appreciable formaldehyde forma-
 tion  (Dahl  and  Hadley,  1983).  Browning  (1965)  suggested that,  like  other


0858p                                -10-                             10/02/86

-------
 acia  esters  or che glycol ethers,  2-
-------
                                  3.   c r f IC i b
5.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
    Pertinent data  regarding  the carclnogenlclty of 2-methoxyethanol acetate
could not be  located 1n the available literature as cited 1n the Appendix.
5.2.   MUTAGEJJICITY
    2-Methoxyetnano?  acetate   strongly  induced  aneuploidy  but  not  mHottc
recombination or point mutation  In the  yeast Saccharomyces cerevlslae strain
D.61 .M,   oui   only   at.  reiativeiy  nigh  concentrations   that   ranged  from
2.91-5.66!',  (Z'mmerman et  al.,  1985).   These authors suggested  that  this may
not  reflect  2-,-nethoxyethano]  acetate-Induced  changes  In  DNA  or  DNA-metabo-
Uzlng systems,  but  rather  may be the  consequence  of  effects  on  the spindle
apparatus.   Further  experiments  were conducted  on porcine  brain  tubulln \r\
vitro,  and   It  was  demonstrated  that  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  accelerated
tubulln  assembly  at  concentrations  >100-fold  lower  than  those needed  to
Induce aneuploidy  (Groschel-Stewart  et al., 1985).. The correlation between
these two events  1s  speculative, however, because  of  the  sp.ecles difference
between  porcine brain and yeast  spindle  tubulln  and the  large discrepancy In
the  concentrations   needed   to    Induce  these   changes.    Additional  data
pertinent to 2-methoxyethanol  acetate mutagenlcUy were not  located.
5.3.   TERATOGENICITY
    Information  concerning  the  potential  teratogenlc  effects  of 2-methoxy-
ethanol  acetate could not be  located  In  the available  literature as  cited In
the Appendix.   Jji  vitro  studies  have shown,  however,  that 2-methoxyethanol
acetate  Is  hydrolyzed to  2-methoxyethanol   (see  Section  4.3.), which  Is an
established teratogen (U.S. EPA,  1986c).
G858p                               -12-                             03/20/87

-------
 i.4.    OTHER  .^PRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS
     Nagano et  al.   (1979)  Investigated  the  testlcular'  toxiclty  Induced  by
 2-methoxyethanol  in 6-week-old male  JCL-ICR  mice.   The compound was  diluted
 in water ;and  administered  orally  by stomach tube  to  groups  of five  mice,  5
 days/week  for 5 weeks,  at  dally  doses of 62.5,  125,  250,  500, 1000  or  2000
 mg/kg.   A control  group of  20 mice  was. given  water  by  the  same method.   A
 dose-related  decrease  in .absolute and relative  testes  weight was  observed;'
 the  decrease  was sta::!s'tici"ily significant at  doses  >500 mg/!500 mg/kg.   In the 500 mg/kg  group,  there was  an  obvious reduction  in
 the  number  of  spermatocytes.   In  the   1000 'mg/kg  group,   spermatids  and
 spermatozoa  were not present,  and the diameter  of  the seminiferous  tubules
 was  significantly  reduced.  .Spermatocytes. existed only  in 'sma11 numbers  in
 some  of the tubules.   In  the  2000 mg/kg group, no germ cells  were  observed,
 although Sertoll  cells  were present.   This  response'was essentially  equiva-
 lent on a  molar  basis to .that  observed  with 2-methoxyethanol.
 5.5.    CHRONIC AND  SUBCHRONIC  EFFECTS
     In  the Nagano  et al. (1979) study  (see Section 5.4.), hematological data
 were  also obtained.  A significant  decrease  in the  white  blood cell  count
.occurred  In  the  1000   and  2000  mg/kg dose  groups,  while  a  reduction  in
 hemoglobin was seen only  in  the  high  dose  mice.  Changes  in  the  red  blood
 cell  count and packed  cell volume  were.less  pronounced.  No other  pertinent
 data  regarding the chronic  or  subchronic  effects of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate
 could be located  in the available  literature  as  cited  in  the  Appendix.
0858o                                -13-                              03/20/87

-------
 i.j.    OTHER 3ELEVANT  IHF08HATION
    The  acute  toxldty of 2-methoxyethanol acetate  In  animals  Is summarized
 In  Table 5-1.   LD5Q  values  of 3.93 g/kg  for  rats and  1.25  g/kg for guinea
 pigs were  determined  by  feeding  50% aqueous solutions by stomach tube (Smyth
 et  al.,  1941).   Gross  pathology  observations  revealed effects on the kidney,
 liver  and  a1ges.t1ve tract.   Rabbits died after  receiving  3 daily oral 'doses
 of  either  0.5 or  1.0 g/kg.  and  all exhibited  signs of  kidney  Injury with
 albumin  and granular casts 1'n .the urine (Gross, 1938).
    Gross  (1938)  conducted  extensive studies  on  the  acute Inhalation toxic-
 Ity of 2-methoxyethanol  acetate In  a  number   of  species.   Kidney Injury was
 observed  In  cats,  guinea .pigs,  rabbits  and  mice following  repeated 8-hour
 exposures  to  500   or  1000   ppm  (2416  or  4831   mg/m3).   At  500 ppm,  cats
 showed  slight  narcosis and  died, while at 1000  ppm, deaths  occurred In all
 species.   Cats were able to tolerate repeated 4- to  6-hour exposures to 200
 ppm (966 mg/m3),  although decreases  In blood pigments  and  In  the  red blood
 cell count were  observed.   Cats  were also  able  to survive a 7-hour  exposure
 to  1500 ppm (7247  mg/ra3),  but did  have  ah Increase tn b.lood  clotting time
 and displayed  changes  In the  brain.  , Cats died  after  being  exposed to 2500
 ppm  (12,078  mg/m3)  for  9   hours.   Mice  and   rabbits   survived  a  3-hour
 exposure  to  4554  ppm  (22,000 mg/m3),  an  essentially  saturated  atmosphere.
A  similar  1-hour  exposure  resulted only   In  mucous  membrane  .Irritation  In
mice,   rats,  guinea pigs  and  rabbits..   Dogs  exposed to  2-methoxyethanol
acetate  vapor  at a  concentration  of 400  ppm  (1933 mg/m3).  8  hours/day for
 120 days had minor disturbances In liver function. (Union Carbide, 1958).
    Five drops  of  undiluted  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  produced mild Irrita-
 tion  In the  eyes  of  'a  rabbit,  while application  to  rabbit  skin  was not
significantly Irritating (Union Carbide. 1958).
Q858p                               -14-                             10/02/86

-------
                                                          TABLE 5-1
0
oo
in
CD
•o
Route Species
Oral rat
rabbit
guinea pig
Inhalation rat
i. rabbit,
T guinea pig
cat
cat
Subcutaneous guinea pig
guinea pig
cat
Acute Toxlclty of 2-Hethoxyuthanol Acetate
Dose/Concentrat Ion
3.93 g/kg
0.5-1.0 g/kg,
3 dally doses
1.25 g/kg
7000 ppin (33,610 nig/m3)
for 4 hiiur-s
1000 ppm (4830 mg/ni3)
repeated 8-hour exposures
500 or 1000 ppm. (24 15 or
4830 mg/ra3) repeated
8-hour exposures
2500 ppm (12.075 mg/m3)
for 9 hours
5 g/kg
1.25 gAg
3-4 g/k.j
Response
1=050
death
L050
death In
2/6 animals
death
death
death
HLD
L050
HID
Reference
Smyth et all. 1941
Gross, 1930
Smyth et al. . 1941
Smyth and Carpenter, 1948
Gross, 193U
Gross. 193U
Gross, 193U
Flury and Utrth, 1933
S'niyth.et al. , 1941
riury and Wtrth. 1933
o
ISJ

-------
            ind  C-ahi  i"i97i;  ,"r:portea   the  :ase of  i   ;3-year-j id  -woman ..'no
developed  acute dermatitis  on the  nose from  contact with  her eyeglasses.
Patch  testing  demonstrated  the  causative  agents   to  be  2-methoxyethanol
acetate or  ethyl acetate.   This  is  the only recorded case of adverse effects
In humans  following  exposure  to  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  and the results are
Inconclusive.   Exposure to  1000  ppm  (4831  mg/m3}  2-methoxyethanpl  acetate
for  1  minute was  Intolerable  for  volunteers,  while a  level  of  120 ppm (580
mg/m3)  for  3  minutes  "provided  good  warning  properties"  (Union Carbide,
1958).
5.7.   SUMMARY
    No  Information.  Is  available  regarding  either,  the   carclnogenlclty  or
teratogenlclty. of  2-methoxyethanol acetate  In  animals  or  humans.,   2-Methoxy-
ethanol  acetate reportedly  caused  aneuploldy  In  yeast   (Zimmerman  et al.,
1985). but  there Is  considerable doubt  as  to  the  relevance of these data to
actual genotoxlclty.
    The. only  study  that   demonstrates  the  In  vivo  toxlclty  of   2-methoxy-
ethanol  acetate was  conducted by  Nagano  et  al.  (1979), who  treated male
MCL-ICR mice at  oral  doses  of  6'2.5..  125. 250,  500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg/day.  5
days/week  for   5  weeks.   Significant   decreases  In  testlcular weight and
substantial  atrophy   were   observed  In  animals  receiving  >500 mg/kg.  In
addition,  leukopenla  was evident  In  mice In  the  1000  and 2000 mg/kg groups.
No effects  were observed  at  <250 mg/kg/day.   These  responses  were similar
qualitatively  and  quantitatively,  (on   a molar  basis) to those  Induced  by
2-methoxyethanol In the same study.
0858p                               -16-                             03/20/87

-------
     Oral  LDcQ values  ror  i-,netnoxyeihano'i acetate  ranue from.i. 25  -j/ku  in



guinea  pigs  to  3.93  g/kg \n rats (Smyth et al., 1941).   Similar results were



obtained  Following  subcutaneous  Injection  (Smyth  et  al.,  1941;  Flury and



W1rth.  1933).   Kidney lesions were common  following  these exposures.  Three



repeated   8-hour   Inhalation  exposures  of  .1000   ppm  (4831   mg/m3)  were



generally  lethal   to  cats,  rabbits,   guinea  pigs  and  mice  (Gross,  1938).



Humans  were, unable  to  tolerate exposure  to  1000  ppm  (4831  mg/m3)  for  1



hour,  while.a : level  of. 120, ppm  (580 mg/m3)  for  3 minutes  '"provided  good



warning properties"  (Union Carbide, 1958):
0853p                               -17-                              10/02/86

-------
                             6.  AQUATIC rOXICIT'f
6.1.   ACUTE
    Little  Information  1s  available   regarding  the  effects   of  2-methoxy-
ethanol  acetate on  aquatic  organisms.   Dawson  et  al.  (1977)  reported  that
.the  96-hour  LC5Q  value  for bluegllls,1  Lepomls macrochlrus.  was  45  mg/i.
No  mortalities  occurred  at  10  mg/l, while   10,   60  and  100%  mortality
occurred  at 25., 50. and 100 mg/i,.respectively,   tiawson et al.  (1977)  also
determined  .a  96;-hour  LC5Q  value  of  40  mg/i  for   tidewater  sllversl'des,
Menldla  berylllna.  with 100%  mortality at  75  mg/l,   70%  at  50 mg/l  and  0%
at  25 mg/l.   Bridle  et  al.  (1979a)   reported  a 24-hour  LC,_ of  190  mg/i
for the goldfish, Carasslus  auratus.
6.2.   CHRONIC
    Pertinent   data   regarding1  the  chronic  toxlclty  of . 2-methoxyethanol
acetate  could not  be located  In  the   available  literature as  cited .in the
Appendix.
6.3.   PLANTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding   the  effects  of  2-methoxyethanol   acetate  on
aquatic plants  could not  be located In the  available .literature  as cited In
the Appendix.
6.4.   RESIDUES
    Pertinent  data   regarding.  2-methoxyethanol   acetate  residues  In aquatic
biota  could not  be  located In  the  available  literature as  cited  In the
Appendix!
6.5.   SUMMARY
    little  Information  Is   available  concerning the  effects   of  2-methoxy-
ethanol  acetate  on  aquatic  organisms.   LC,_  values  of  40, 45  and  190
mg/i  were  reported   for  tidewater  sllversldes,  bluegllls  (Oawson et  al.,
1977) and goldfish (Bridle et al., 1979a), respectively.

0858p                               -18-                             03/20/87

-------
                         7.  ^JIDELIJiES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    ACGIH .(1985-1986)  adopted  a  TLV  for  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  of  5  ppm
(24  mg/m3),  based  upon  the reported  testlcular  effects  and'  the apparent
hydrolysis  of the ester, to  2-methoxyethanol  (ACGIH,  1986).   OSHA  (1985)  has
established  a PEL  of, 25 ppm  (120 mg/m3).  the  same as  recommenced for  the
parent glycol ether..  Both,  of  these recommendations are  accompanied  by  th^
"skin" .  notation,   inalcating  that   dermal   absorption   is  a-  potentially
hazardous route of exposure.
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards, for  the protection  of aquatic  biota from  the
effects  of  2-methoxyethanol acetate  could not  be located  In the  available
•literature as cited In the Appendix.
0858p                                -19-                              03/20/87

-------
                                    SK  ASSESSMENT

    Pertinent data  regarding  either  the  cardnogenlcHy  or  teratogenlcity  of,
2-methoxyethanol  acetate  In animals or  humans could  not  be located.  In  the
available  literature.   Therefore,  because of the lack of  carcinogenic  data,
                                                             :
this  compound  Is  classified  as  a  U.S/  EPA  Group  0  chemical   (I.e..  Us
carcinogenic  potential  Is  not  ascertalnable).    2-Methoxyethanql  acetate
reportedly caused aneuploVdy  In  yeast  (Zimmerman  et al.,  1985},  but there  is
considerable doubt as to the relevance  of these data'to actual genotoxlclty.
    The  only study  that  demonstrates  the  \n_ vivo  toxlclty of  2-methoxy-
ethanol  acetate was  conducted  by  Nagano  et  al.  (1979),  who treated  male
JCL-ICR mice at oral  doses  of  62.5,  125,  250,  500,  1000 or 2000 mg/kg/day, 5
days/week  for  5  weeks.    Significant  decreases   In   testlcular  weight  and
substantial  atrophy  were   observed  In  animals  receiving  >500  mg/kg.   In
addition,  leukopenla  was .evident In mice In the  1000  and  2000  mg/kg groups.
No. significant  adverse  effects were observed at  doses of  <250  mg/kg..   These
responses  were  similar qualitatively  and  quantitatively (on a molar  basis)
to those Induced by 2-methoxyethanol In the same study.
    Based  on the  available  Information, regarding, the  adverse   effects  of
2-methoxyethanol  (U.S.  EPA,  T986c)  and  the  evidence that  2-methoxyethanol
acetate  Is hydrolyzed  to  the parent glycol ether.  It  Is  not prudent to base
an RfD  for  2-methoxyethanol  acetate oh the data provided by Nagano  et. al.
(1979).  A NOEL  of  250 mg/kg/day,  5  days/week  (179  mg/.kg/day).  as  estab-
lished  by   this  study.  Is  not  adequately,  protective  If  2-methoxyethanol
acetate  produces  teratogenlc,  fetotoxic  and  reproductive  effects  at  doses
equlmolar  to those of  2-methoxyethanol producing  such  effects.   Thus,  an RfD
for  2-methoxyethanol  acetate  can be derived based  on  the  RfO for 2-methoxy-


0853p .                               -20-                             04/?7/37

-------
•ethanoi.   This1 procedure  vi  j'.rm'iar  Lo  :fiat 'proposes  :y  ACGIK  ',1936)  i:::r
 establishing  a  TLV for 2-methoxyethanol  acetate.  No chronic  oral  or  Inhala-.
 tlon  studies on 2-methoxyethanol  are  available; also  no studies  regarding
 the  subchronlc  oral  toxldty  are  available.    Oral   studies  regarding  the
 teratogenlc   and  reproductive  effects  of.  2-methoxyethanol  are . available;
 however,  a NOEL  or  NOAEL  could  not be  established  from  these  studies  (U.S..
 EPA.  1986c).   Subchronlc  Inhalation, studies by  Miller  e.t al.  (1982,  1983),
 nowever,  established .a.  NOEL  of 10  ppm,  6  hours/day,  5 days/week  ',ri  rabbits
 (converted  to   1.46  mg/kg/day)  and  a   LOAEL   of   30  ppm.  6  hours/day,  5
 days/week  In rabbits  (converted  to 4.57 mg/kg/day)  for testlcular  lesions
 and  developmental effects.   Dividing  the NOEL  by  an  uncertainty  factor  of
 1000  resulted. In an  RfD   for  2-methoxyethahol  of  0.001  mg/kg/day or  0.01
 mg/day  for a  70  kg man.
    An  RfD of 0.002 mg/kg/day  or  0.11 mg/day for a 70 kg man  can  be  derived
 for  2-methoxyethanol acetate  by  analogy  to 2-methoxyethanol  by  multiplying
 the  RfD  for  2-methoxyethanol  by the molecular weight  ratio of  2-methoxy-
 ethanol to 2-methoxyethanol  acetate.
08£8p                                -21-                             04/27/87

-------
                           •':.   3EPORTABLE  OUANTITIES
9.1.   REPORTABLE QUANTITY (RQ) RANKING BASED ON CHRONIC TOXICITY
     Only  one  subchronic  toxidty  study  of   2-methoxyethanol  acetate  was
available  (Nagano  et al., 1979).   This  study was discussed  in  Section 5.4.
and  Is  summarized  1n Table 9-1.   The  500 mg/kg/day,  5 days/week (357 mg/kg/
day)  exposure was  the  lowest dose  In  the study io  cause  reduced  spermato-
genesls.   Multiplying the dose  of  357  mg/kg/day by the  cube  root  of  the
ratio of  the  mouse  body weight (0.03  kg)  to  the reference  human body weinht
to convert  to an equivalent  human  dose and  by  70 kg  to  express  the  dose In
mg/day and  dividing  by  10 to approximate  chronic  exposure  results  in an MED
of  188  mg/day  (Table 9-2).   The  MED  corresponds  to an  RV.  of  2.1.   The
effect  of  reduced   spermatogenesls  warrants   an   RV   of  8.   which  when
multiplied  by the RV.  yields a CS of 17, corresponding  to an RQ  of 1000.
Mice  at  >1000  mg/kg/day  also  had  hematologlcal  effects,  but. since these
effects  warranting   lower  RV s  were  observed  at  higher doses,  calculation
of CSs Is not necessary.
    Since 2-methoxyethanol has been studied  for teratogenlc and reproductive
effects more  extensively  than  2-methoxyethanol  acetate,  and since 2-methoxy-
ethanol acetate  is   believed  to  produce similar effects  as 2-methoxyethanol
on an equlmolar  basis,   It  Is more  appropriate  to  derive  the  RQ  for  the
acetate by  analogy  to the more  studied compound.  U.S.  EPA (1986c)  derived
an RQ of  100 for  2-methoxyethanol based on  a 6-week  Inhalation  study by
Nelson et  al. (1984) using  Sprague-Oawley rats.  In  this  study,  the 21 -day
offspring of  male  rats  exposed to 25 ppm (78  mg/m3)  of  2-methoxyethanol,  7
hours/day,  7  days/week  for   6 weeks  had  neurochemlcal  deviations   In  the
brain.   An  RV   of   7  was  assigned.  The  exposure level  of  25  ppm  (78
mg/m3)  corresponds   to   121  mg/m3  of  2-methoxyethanol  acetate.   Expanding
0858p                               -22-                             03/20/87

-------
o
to
00
                                                     TABLE 9-1

                   Oral Toxlclty Sumiiary for 2-Nethoxyethanol Acetate Using Hale JCL-1CR Mtcea>b
   No. at
   Start
Average
Uelght
 (kg)
Vehicle/
Physical
 State
Exposure
Transformed
Animal Dose
(ing/kg/day)
Kesponsc
    S/group
 0.03
 water       62.5, 125. 250
             500. 1000 or
             2000 mg/kg/day.
             5 days/week for
             5 weeks
                 45. 89. 179.
                 357, 714 or
                 1429
                 Significantly reduced absolute
                 and relative testes weight at
                 >500 niy/kij; dose-related atrophy
                 of seminiferous epithelium at 500
                 mg/kg; at 500 nig/kg reduction In
                 number of spermatocytes; at 1000
                 mg/kg no spermatlds or sperma-
                 tozoa present; at 2000 nig/kg.
                 Sertoli cells only were present;
                 leukopenla at >1000 mg/kg/day;
                 reduced hemoglobin at 2000
                 mg/kg/day
   aSource: Nagano  et  al..  1979

   bPurlty of compound was  not reported
o
CJ
I\J
o
CD

-------
en
CD
•o
                                                     1ABLE 9-2


                                   Compos tie Scores for ?-Hcthoxyethanol Acetate
Route
Chronic
Species Animal Dose Human MED RVd Effect
kVe CS KQ Reference
(mg/kg/day) (mg/day)
Oral

Inhalation


mouse/
JCL-ICR
rat/Sprague-
Oawley

357 188a 2.1 depressed
spermatogenes is
23b 2Ba 3.3 neurochemlcal
deviations In
offspring
B 17 1000 Nagano
el al..
7 23 100 Nelson
et al..


1979

19U4

    aAn  uncertainty  factor  of  10 was  Incorporated  to extrapolate to a chronic  human MHO


    blhe administered  compound was  2-methoxycthanol. but  the dose Is expressed as 2-methoxyethanol acetate.
o
CO
ro
o
CO

-------
 the  exposure  or   121  mq/m-'  over  a  <:
-------
                                   TABLE  9-3

                           2-Methoxyethanol Acetate
          Minimum Effective Dose (MED) .and Reportable Quantity (RQ)a
Route:                  i.-halation

Ooseb:                  28 mg/day

Effect:                 neurochemlcal deviations In offspring

Reference:              Nelson et al., 1984

RVd:                    3.3

RVe:                    7

Composite Score:        23

RQ:                     100


aThe derivation Is based on data for 2-methoxyethanol.  The dose 1s expressed
 as 2-methoxyethanol acetate.

bEqu1valent human dose
0858p                               -26-                             03/20/87

-------
                                iO.  RErESEHCES

 ACGIH    (American   Conference   of   Governmental    Industrial   Hygienists).
 1985-1986.   TLVs:  Threshold  Limit  Values  for  Chemical  .Substances in the Work
 Environment  with  Intended Changes  for 1985-1986.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 23.

 ACGIH  '(American  Conference  of  Governmental .  Industrial  Hygienists},   1986.
 Documentation  of.  the  Threshold Limit 'Values and Biological Exposure Indices,
 5th  ed.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 366.

 Bridle.  A.L.,  C.J.H.  Wolff  and  M.  Winter.   1979a.   The acute  toxlclty of
.some petrochemicals to goldfish.  Water Res.  .13(7): 623-626.

 Bridle,  A.L..  C.J.H.  Wolff and  M.  Winter.    1979b.   BOD  and  COD  of some
 petrochemicals.  Water Res.  13(7):.627-630.

 Brown.  E.S.,  C.F.  Mauser.  B.C.  Ream  and R.V.  Berthold.   1980.   Ethylene
 glycol  and  propylene  glycol.   I_n:  Klrk-Othmer   Encyclopedia  of  Chemical
 Technology,  Vol.  11,  3rd  ed.,  M.  Grayson  and  D. Eckroth,  Ed.  John Wiley and
 Sons,  Inc.,  New York.  p. 933-956.

 Browning,  E.    1965.    Toxlclty   and  Metabolism  of  Industrial  Solvents.
 Elsevler Publishing Company, New York.  p.  621-623.

 Cook,  R.R.,  K.M.  Bodner,  R.C.  Kolesar,  et   al.   1982.   A cross-sectional
 study  of ethylene  glycol  monomethyl  ether process  employees.  Arch. Environ.
 Health.  37(6.): 346-351.


 0858p                                -27-                             03/20/87

-------
pan!.  A..",.  -:na  1-i.M.  Hadley.  ".983.  Formaldehyde  production  nroT.otc-d  by .-.it



nasal  cytochrome  P-450-dependent  monooxygenases  with  nasal  decongestants,



essences,  solvents,   air   pollutants,  nicotine  and  cocaine  as  substrates.



Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.  67(2): 200-205.







Dawson,  G.W.,  A.L. Jennings, 0.  Drozdowskl  and E.  Rider.   1977.   The acute



toxlcity  of 47  industrial  chemicals  to -fresh  and  salt  water  fishes.   J..



Hazard. Mat.  1(4): 303-318.







Dow  Chemical  Co.   1981.    The  Glyc.ol . Ethers  Handbook.   Dow  Chemical  Co.,



Midland, MI.







ECETOC  (European  Chemical  Industry  Ecology and  Toxicology  Centre).   1985.



Technical  Report  No.  17.  The  toxicology of glycol  ether  and  its relevance



to man: An up-dating of ECETOC Technical Report No. 4, April. 1985.







Flury,  F.  and  W.  W1rth.   1933.   Zur  Toxlkologle der  Losuhgmltter.   Arch.



Gerwerbepathol. Gewerbehyg.  5:  52-289.  (Cited in U.S. EPA. 1982)







Groeschel-Stewart,  U.,  V.M.  Mayer,  R.E.  Taylor-Mayer  and  F.K.  Zimmerman.



1985.   Aprotic  polar  solvents  Inducing  chromosomal  ma 1 segregation  In yeast



Interfere with  the assembly of  porcine brain  tubulln Ui vitro.  Mutat. Res.



149(3): 333-338.







Gross,  E.   1938.  In.:  Toxicology and Hygiene  of  Industrial  Solvents, K.B.



Lehman  and  R.  Flury,  Ed.   Springer,  Berlin.  Germany.  (CHed  in U.S. EPA,



1982)









0858p                               -28-                             03/20/87

-------
Hawley,  G.G. _  1-981.   The  Conaensea  Chemical   ;)icr.ionary,   IQth  ed.   Van
Nostrand Relnhold Co., New York.  p. 434.

Hoffman,  H.D.   1984.   BeMcht  uber  die iPrufung  der  StabllHat  von  Glyko-
letheracetaten  In  Rattenpiaoma.    BASF,  International   Report.    (Cited  In
ECETOC, 1985)

Jordan, .W.P. and  M..V.  Dahl.   1971.   Contact'dermatitis  to  a plastic solvent
In .eyeglasses. . Arch. Derm'.  .1.04:  524-528.

Kool,  H.J.,  C.F.  van Kreljl.and B.C.J.. Zoeteman.   1982.   Toxicology, assess-
ment  of  organic  compounds  In  drinking  water.   Crlt.  Rev.  Environ.  Contain.1
12: 307-357.

Ludzack,  F.J.  and  M.8. . Ett,1ngeri    I960..   Chemical structures  resistant to
aerobic  biochemical  stabilization.   J.  Mater   Pollut.  Control   Fed.   32:
1173-1200.

Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl  and O.H.   Rosenblatt.'   1982.   .Handbook  of Chemical
property Estimation Methods.   McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.  p. 5-5.

Miller, R.R.. l.L.  Calhoun and  B.L.  Yano.   1982.  Ethylene glycol monomethyl
ether: 13-Week  vapor  Inhalation study .In male rabbits.   'Report  prepared for
the Chemical Manufacturers Association, March 25,  1982.

Miller,  R.R.,   J.A.  Ayres,  J.T.  Young  and H.J.  McKenna.    1983.   Ethylene
glycol monomethyl ether.   I. Subchronlc, vapor  Inhalation study with rats and
rabbits.  Fund. Appl. Toxlcol.   3(1): 49-54.

0858p                                -29-                             03/20/87

-------
.'•ill Is,  Cf.,  •:._.' and  7.7.  ?. Uck,  Ir .   i-rE*. ' 31ciog1cal  oxidation  of  syn-
thetic  organic  chemicals,   hr.  Proc.  8th  Ind. Waste Conf. Eng.  Bull.   Purdue
Univ.,  Eng. Ext.  Ser.  p. 492-517.

Nagano.  K.,  E.  Nakayama, M. Koyano,  H. Oobayashl, H. Adachi and  T.  Yamada.
1979.   Testicular  atrophy  of  mice  Induced  by  ethylene  glycol  monoalkyl
ethers.  Jap.  J.  Ind.  Health.   21(1):  29-35.   (Japanese  with  English trans-
lation)  FYI-OTS-038-0105.  Microfiche No. 0105.

Nelson, B.K.., W.S.  BMghtwell,  J.R.  Burg  and V.J.  Massari.   1984.   Behavior-
al  and  neurochemical  alterations  in the offspring  of  rats  after.maternal  or
paternal  Inhalation  exposure   to  the  Industrial   solvent  2-me,thqxyethanol.
Pharmacol. Blochem'. Behav.  20(2): 269-279.

NIOSH   (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety  and  Health).    1985.
National Occupational.Exposure Survey as of 9/20/85.

OSHA  (OccuUonal  Safety  and Health Administration).   1985.  OSHA  Safety and
Health Standards.  29 CFR 1910.1000..

Rowe.  V.K.  and  M.A.  Wolf.   1982.   Derivatives  of  glycols.   .In.:  Patty's
Industrial Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  Vol  2,   3rd ed.,  G.D.  Clayton and  F.E.
Clayton, Ed.   John Wiley and Sons Inc.,  New York.  p. 3909-4052.

RTECS  (Regl'stry  of  Toxic  Effects  of  Chemical  Substances).    1984.   RTECS
Current Awareness File.  March, 1984.
0858p                               -30-                             03/20/87

-------
Saoijic.  A:   ~i984.   Preoiciions  or che nature  ina  sirenqih of soi'i sorpnon
of  organic pollutants  by molecular  topology.   J.  Agrlc.  Food  Chem.   32:
234-246.

Sax.  I.N.  1984.  Dangerous  Properties  of  Industrial  Materials.  6th ed.  Van
Nostrand  Retnhold Co., New York.   p. 1346.

Smi.th,  R.L..   1984.   Review  of glyco.l  ether -=nc::  glycbl  ether  ester solvents
used  In the coating Industry.  Environ Health-F°rspect:  57: 1-4.

Smyth,  Jr.,.J.F. and  C.P.  Carpenter.   1943.    Further  experience  with  the
range-finding  test  In  the  Industrial  toxicology  laboratory.   J.  Ind. Hyg.
Toxlcol.  30:  63.

Smyth,  Jr., J.F.., J. Seato'n  and  L.  Fischer.  1941.   The single dose toxlclty
of some glycols and derivatives.   J. Ind.  Hyg.  Toxlcol.  23(6): 259-268.

Somanl, S.M.,  R.G.  Teece and  O.J.  Schaeffer.   1980.   Identification  of  co-
carcinogens and  promoters  In Industrial discharges Into and  In  the Illinois
River.  J. Toxlcol.  Environ.  Health.  6(2): 315-331.

Stott,  W.T.  and  M.J.  McKenna.   1985.   Hydrolysis  of several  glycol  ether
acetates  and  acrylates  esters  by  nasal  mucosal carboxylesterase \n_  vitro.
Fund..Appl. Toxlcol.  5(2): 399-404.
0858p                                -31-                              03/20/37

-------
Swann, • i-i.L.,  u.A.  LdSKOwsx'i,  ,-.J. McCu i"i,  £.  Vdnaerxuy  -^na ri.u.  uisriDurtjer.
1983.   A rapid  method for  the estimation  of the  environmental  parameters
octanol/water  partition coefficient,  soil  sorption  constant,  water  to  air
ratio  and water  solubility.  Res. Rev.  85: 17-28.

Union  Carbide.   1958!   Toxicology   Studies:  Methyl  "Cellosolve"  Acetate.
Union  Carbide Corp., New York,  (Cited  in U.S. EPA, 1982)

Union  Carbide.   1979.   1979-1980  Chemicals  and Plastics  Physical  Properties.
Union  Carbide Chemicals and Plastics, New York.  p. 13.

U.S. EPA.  1978.  TSCA Plant Production.  On-line.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  In  the  Preparation  of
Health  Effects  Assessment  Chapters  of the   Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.  45:49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.   1982.   Chemical  Hazard   Information  Profile  (CHIP):  2-Methoxy-
ethanol Acetate.  OTS, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1986a.   Medchem Software  Release  3.32,  CLOGP,  Graphical Exposure
Modeling System  (GEMS).  On-line.  OTS, U.S. EPA, Washington. DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986b.   Graphical   Exposure  Modeling  System  (GEMS):  Fate  of
Atmospheric Pollutants (FAP).  OTS. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
0858p                               -32-                             03/20/87

-------
U.S.-  c?A.   1336c.   Health  ana iinvironmentd"!  Effectj  rrofiie on  i--'
ethanol.   Prepared   by  the  Office  of Health  and Environmental  Assessment,
Environmental  Criteria.and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for  the  Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986d.    Guidelines   for   Carcinogen  .Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-340,03.

USITC  (U.S.  International   Trade  Commission).    1985.    Synthetl.c   Organic
Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and  Sales. 1984.  USITC Publ.  1745.  Washington.
DC.  p. 288.

Verschueren, K.   1983.  Handbook  of  Environmental  Data on Organic Chemicals,
2nd ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co:. New York.

Yanaglhara, S.,  I.   Shi ma da,  E.  Shinoyama,  F. Chlsaka  and K. Salto.   1977.
Photochemical  reactivities  of hydrocarbons.   In: Proc.  4th  Int. Clean  Air
Congr..  p.  472-477.

Zimmerman.   F.K.,  V.W.  Mayer,  I.  Scheel  and  M.A. Resnlck.   1985.   Acetone,
methyl  ethyl  ketone,  ethyl   acetate.  acetonltrUe and  other polar  aprotlc
solvents  are  strong  Inducers  of  aneuploldy In Saccharomyces  cerevisiae.
Mutat. Res.  149: 339-351.
0858p                        .       -33-                             03/20/87

-------
                                   APPENDIX

                              LITERATURE  SEARCHED
    This  profile  1s  based  on  data   Identified  by  computerized1  literature

searches of the  following:


         GLOBAL
         TSCATS
         CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities1Status Report)
         CAS online STN. International'
         TOXLINE   .
         TOXBACK 76
         TOXBACK 65
         RTECS
         OHM TADS
         STORET
         SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
         SANSS
         AQUIRE
         TSCAPP
         NTIS
         Federal Register


These  searches  were  conducted  In  April.  1986.   In  addition,  hand  searches

were  made  of   Chemical. Abstracts  (Collective  Indices  6  and  7),  and  the

following secondary sources were reviewed:


    ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hygle.nlsts.).
    1986.   Documentation  of  the Threshold Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1985-1986.    TLVs:  Threshold  Limit  Values  for  .Chemical  Substances
    and  Physical  Agents  In  the   Workroom   Environment  .with  Intended
    Changes for 1985-1986.  Cincinnati. OH.  114 p.

    Clayton.  G.O.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and Toxicology,  3rd rev.  ed.,   Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   2878 p.

    Clayton.  G.D.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed:   1981.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and Toxicology.  3rd rev.  ed..   Vol.  2B.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  .p. 2879-3816.
0858p                               -34-                             03/20/87

-------
     "-ytbn-,  ;"!.;..•  end  F .£.   Clayton, ' Ed.   1932.    ^iiy1-  Ir.dustr-al
     Hygiene  and  Toxicology,'  3rd  rev.  =d.,  Vol.   2C.   ]ohn . Wiley   2nd
     Sons, NY.   p. 3817-5112.

     Grayson,  N. and  0.  Eckroth, Ed.   1978-1983.   Kirk-Othmer  Encyclo-
     pedia of  Chemical  Technology,  3rd  ed.   John Wiley and Sons, NY.  23
    .Volumes.

     Hamilton, A.  and  H.L.  Hardy.  1974.   Industrial Toxicology, 3rd  ed.
     Publishing  Sciences Group, Inc., Littleton, HA.  575 p.

     IARC  (International   Agency  for  Research  on  Cancer;.   IARC  Mono-
     graphs  on  the   Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk  of  Chemicals  to
     Humans.  WHO, IARC, Lyons, France,

     Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey, S.T.  Liu,  T.W.  Chow  and  H.L.  Johnson.
   .  198'4.  Data aqulsltlon  for environmental  transport and fate screen-'
     Ing  for  compounds of  Interest  in  the  Office  of  Solid  Waste.    EPA
     600/6-84-010.  NTIS PB84-243906.  SRI International, Menlo Park,,  CA.

     NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).  1986.   toxicology Research  and
   .Testing   Program.    Chemicals   on   Standard  Protocol.   Management'
     Status.

    Ouellette,  R.P.   and  J.A.   King.   1977.  'Chemical Week  Pesticide
     Register.   McGraw-Hill Book  Co., NY.

    Sax, N.I.   1979.   Dangerous  Properties  of Industrial Materials,  5th  '
    ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    SRI  .(Stanford Research  Institute).1,   1984.   Directory  of  Chemical
    Producers.  Henlo Park, CA.

    U.S. EPA..  1985.   Status  Report  on Rebuttable Presumption Against
    Registration  (RPAR)  or  Special Review  Process.  Registration 'Stan-.
   •dards and the Data Call  l.n Programs.   Office of> Pesticide Programs.,
    Washington,  DC.

    U.S. EPA.   1985.   CSB  Existing  Chemical Assessment Tracking System.
    Name and. CAS  Number  Ordered Indexes.   Office  of  Toxic  Substances,
    Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade . Commission).    1983.    Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.   Production  and  Sales,  1982,  USITC  Publ.
    1422, Washington, DC.

    Verschueren,  K.   1983.   Handbook  of  Environmental  Data  on Organic
    Chemicals,  2nd ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    Wlndholz, M.,  Ed.  1983.   The Merck  Index,  10th ed.  Merck and Co..
    Inc., Rahway,.NJ.

    Worthing. C.R.  and S.B.  Walker,  Ed.    1983.  The  Pesticide Manual.
    British Crop Protection Council.  695 p.
0858p                               -35-                             03/20/87

-------
    In 'adaition,  approximately  20  compendia  :f  :quat:c  "-.oxk'ty  data  were

reviewed, Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus   Laboratories,   1971.   Water Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume   3.    Effects   of   Chemicals  on  Aquatic  Life.
    Selected  Data  from the  Literature  through 1968.  Prepared  for  the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No.. 68-01-0007.. Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and M.T.  Finley.'  1980.   Handbook of  Acute  ToxIcHy
    of  Chemicals  to  F1sh  and   Aquatic  Invertebrates.   Summaries  of
    Toxicity  Tests  Conducted  at Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.    U.S.  Dept.  Interior.  .Fish  and'  Wildlife
    Serv. 2es. Pub!.  137,  Washington,  DC.

    McKee, J.E.  and  H.W.  Wolf.-' 1963.  ' Water  Quality Criteria,  2nd e'd,.
    Prepared  for  the  Resources  Agency  of  California,  State  Water
    Quality Control Board.  Pub!.. No.  3-A.

    Plmental, D.   1971.   Ecological Effects of Pesticides on Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared for the U.S.  EPA, Washington,  DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider, 8.A.   1979.   Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book  1: Toxicology  Data.  Office of Pesticide  Programs, U.S.>
    EPA, Washington,  DC.   EPA 540/9-79-003.   NTIS PB  80-196876.
0858p                               -36-                             03/20/87

-------