xvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Ml 48105
EPA-460/ 3-80-005
Air
Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust
Emissions from a Malfunctioning
Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline
Automobile
-------
EPA-460/3-80-005
REGULATED AND UNREGULATED
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM A MALFUNC
TIONING THREE-WAY CATALYST
GASOLINE AUTOMOBILE
by
Charles Urban
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas
78284
Contract No. 68-03-2692
EPA Project Officer: Robert J. Garbe
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise and Radiation
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
January 1980
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers, copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - in limited quantities - from the
Library Services Office (MD-35), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information Service,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Southwest Research Institute/ 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas,
in fulfillment of Contract No. 68-03-2692. The contents of this report
are reproduced herein as received from Southwest Research Institute.
The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the
author and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as an en-
dorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-80-005
ii
-------
ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions from a current model three-way catalyst-
equipped gasoline automobile operating under malfunction conditions. One
automobile was evaluated over three driving schedules in the unmodified
configuration and in four engine and/or emission control system malfunction
configurations. Exhaust emission constituents measured, in addition to the
currently regulated emissions, include: particulates, sulfates, aldehydes,
sulfides, amines, metals and several additional elements and compounds.
Additional evaluations, in each of the configurations, involved the measure-
ment of the regulated emissions over four short-test procedures.
111
-------
FOREWORD
This project was initiated by the Technology Assessment and Evaluation
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48105. The engineering and analytical effort on which this report
is based was accomplished by the Department of Emissions Research of South-
west Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284. This
project, authorized by Contract 68-03-2692, was initiated on August 21, 1978,
and was completed November 21, 1979.
The SwRI Project Leader was Mr. Charles Urban who supervised all vehicle
testing, data analyses and reporting. Mr. Harry Dietzmann was in charge of
all unregulated emissions procedural development related activities that were
involved in this project. Mr. Karl Springer was Project Manager and was in-
volved in the initial technical and fiscal negotiations and all subsequent
major project decisions.
The Project Officer throughout the entire project was Mr. Robert Garbe
of the Technology Assessment and Evaluation Branch, Environmental Protection
Agency. Mr. Garbe played an active part in several project areas. Dr. Ronald
Bradow and members of his staff, of the Environmental Protection Agency at
Research Triangle Park in North Carolina, provided considerable technical and
other support relative to the analyses of the unregulated emissions.
iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT iii
FOREWORD iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
SUMMARY ix
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Project Objective 1
B. Emissions Measurement Procedures 1
C. Vehicles Evaluated 2
D. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated 2
E. Vehicle Testing 2
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATION AND PROCEDURES 3
A. Vehicle 3
B. Fuel and Lubricant 4
C. Dynamometer and CVS System 4
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis 4
E. Instrumentation for Regulated
Emissions and Engine Parameters 8
F. Emissions Test and Mileage
Accumulation Procedures 9
G. Test Numbering System 12
H. Short-Test Procedures 16
I. Pallflex Filter Samples 16
J. Computational Methods 18
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS 19
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures 19
B. Validation and Qualification of the
Analytical Procedures 23
IV. MALFUNCTION SELECTION AND SCREENING EVALUATIONS 28
A. Selection of Malfunction Conditions 28
B. Description of Malfunction Conditions 32
C. Malfunction Screening Evaluations 33
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd).
V. VEHICLE TESTING 38
A. Malfunctions Evaluated 38
B. Regulated and Unregulated Emissions
Test Results 38
C. Short-Test Procedure Results 40
VI. ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS 41
A. Average Values for the Unmodified Configuration 41
B. Average Values for the Malfunction Configurations 43
C. Analyses of Emissions and Fuel Consumption 43
D. General Effects of Malfunctions on Emissions 46
E. Other Elements and DMNA 46
F. Maximum Emission Values 46
G. Relative Importance of the Maximum Emission Rates 46
LIST OF REFERENCES 58
APPENDICES
A. General Information
B. Malfunction Screening Evaluations
C. Summaries of Vehicle Testing Results
D. FTP Individual Sample Emissions Results
E. Computer Printouts of the Regulated Emissions
Test Results
F. Short-Test Procedure Results
G. Average Values for Unmodified Configuration
H. Average Values for all Configurations
VI
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Gasoline engine emissions sampling system 5
2 Views of the emissions sampling system 6
3 Driving cycle speed vs time traces 15
4 Functional diagram of the E.E.C. II 29
VI1
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Tables Page
1 Description of the Automobile Evaluated 3
2 Description of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 Unleaded Gasoline 7
3 Test Sequence for Each Malfunction H
4 Laboratory Test Sequence 13
5 Summary of Driving Schedule Parameters 14
6 Sequence for Short-Test Procedures 17
7 Sampling and Analysis Methodology for Unregulated
Emissions 20
8 Procedural Validation and Qualification 24
9 Emission Procedural Sample Rates and Accuracy 26
10 Preliminary Malfunction Screening Results 32
11 Malfunction Screening FTP Results - 1979 Mercury
Marquis with 351 "W" Engine 34
12 Configurations Which Produced Relatively Large
Increase in Emissions 36
13 Short-Test Procedure Results 39
14 Average Values for Unmodified Configuration 42
15 Summary of Average Regulated Emissions and Fuel
Consumption Data
16 Summary of the Average Unregulated Emissions Data 45
17 Relationship of Malfunction to Unmodified Emissions
Results for the FTP 47
18 Summary of the Elemental Analyses Results for the FTP 48
19 Highest of the Averaged Emission Rates 49
20 Maximum Emission Levels in the Undiluted Exhaust 54
21 Relative Importance of Maximum Emission Rates 56
Vlll
-------
SUMMARY
The major objective of this project was to study exhaust emissions from
a current model low-NOx, catalyst-equipped gasoline automobile operating under
malfunction conditions. These evaluations involved analyzing the exhaust for
many unregulated compounds and elements in addition to the currently regulated
emissions.
This study involved one automobile; a 1979 Mercury Marquis with a 351-
CID engine. This automobile was certified to the Federal emissions standards
and utilized a catalytic converter with feed-back carburetion. The catalytic
converter contained a three-way catalyst followed by an oxidation catalyst,
with additional air supplied between the two catalysts. Following final
selection of the malfunction conditions, the automobile was evaluated in the
unmodified (tuned-up to manufacturer's specifications) and in four different
malfunction configurations. Malfunction conditions evaluated in the vehicle
testing phase were disconnected oxygen sensor, twelve percent ignition mis-
fire with the air to bypass, disconnected EGR sensor with air to bypass, and
disconnected cold temperature sensor.
Unregulated emission compounds measured included: sulfates, particulates,
metals and other elements, aldehydes, cyanides, sulfides, organic amines,
nickel carbonyl, n-nitrosodimethylandne, ammonia and nitrous oxide. A number
of the analytical procedures for these compounds were developed specifically
for use in this and several other related projects.
The three primary test sequences involved in this project were the light-
duty Federal Test Procedure (FTP), the congested freeway driving schedule and
the highway fuel economy driving schedule. In addition, the regulated emis-
sions were evaluated over the New York City Cycle, the Federal short cycle
and two steady-state procedures. The basic requirements specified in the Code
of Federal Regulations for certification of light-duty vehicles were followed
for the three primary test sequences and the two additional driving cycles.
A significant data base on the car evaluated, for both regulated and un-
regulated emissions, was generated in this project. These data were analyzed
to the extent applicable and are presented in several different formats to
facilitate their review and usage. Highest values detected, for the car oper-
ating under the three primary test cycles in all configurations evaluated, are
summarized as follows:
IX
-------
Emission Rate, mg/km
Emission Unmodified Malfunction
Hydrocarbons 130 1800
Carbon Monoxide3 1600 52400
Oxides of Nitrogena 830 2500
Total Particulatesa 2 11
Sulfate 27 5
Aldehydes & Ketones 3 3
Organic Sulfides <1 1
Organic Amines 0.0 <0.1
Ammonia 5 253
Cyanides & Cyanogen <1 112
Hydrogen Sulfide 0 3
Nickel Carbonyl 0.00 0.00
Nitrous Oxide 24 88
a
Values for the FTP are given for the three regulated
emissions and total particulates. For HC, CO and NOX,
the FTP values were the maximum values.
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This report describes the effort to characterize regulated and un-
regulated exhaust emissions from a current model, three-way catalyst-
equipped, gasoline automobile operating in the unmodified and under mal-
function conditions. This is the third project to be completed from among
several related projects at SwRI involving the evaluation of a large number
of unregulated emissions from gasoline automobiles. The initial projects
involved evaluation of non-catalyst, oxidation catalyst and three-way catalyst
gasoline automobiles. '
A. Project Objective
The major objective of this project was to evaluate the effects of engine
malfunction conditions on exhaust emissions from a current model, three-way
catalyst-equipped, automobile. Emissions evaluated included the three currently
regulated emissions (HC, CO, and NOX) along with a significant number of cur-
rently unregulated compounds (e.g., sulfates, sulfides, aldehydes, amines, etc.)
B. Emissions Measurement Procedures
The emissions measurement procedures utilized in this project ranged from
those procedures routinely used (HC, CO, NOX, sulfate, etc.) to procedures
that required considerable research and experimentation before they became
operational (organic sulfides, amines, etc.). The compounds or compound groups
evaluated, along with the sampling methods used, were as follows:
Sampling
Method Compounds Evaluated
Bag HC, CO, NOX, C02, Individual HC, Nitrous Oxide
and Nickel Carbonyl
Filter Sulfates, Particulates, Metals, and other
Elements
Impinger Cyanides, Aldehydes, Hydrogen Sulfide, Ammonia
and Organic Amines
Trap Carbonyl Sulfide, Organic Sulfide, and DMNA
A number of the procedures for measuring unregulated emissions were developed
in another project and reported in a widely distributed interim report.
* Superscript numbers in parentheses designate references at end of report.
-------
C. Vehicles Evaluated
One automobile was utilized in this project, a 1979 Mercury Marquis, with
a 351-CID engine, certified for sale in the 49 states (excluding California).
This car had feedback carburetion and also had EGR. The catalytic converter
consisted of a three-way catalyst followed by an oxidation catalyst, with ad-
ditional air introduced between the catalysts.
D. Malfunction Conditions Evaluated
The automobile was evaluated in the unmodified configuration (i.e., tuned-
up to manufacturer's specifications) and under various malfunction conditions.
Potential malfunction conditions for this project were identified from the
service manual, discussion with a representative from the manufacturer and the
previous malfunction projects.d»2) A series of tests were then conducted to
identify the "best" malfunction candidates for use in this project. Mal-
function conditions initially considered were: disabled oxygen sensor, rich
operation, engine misfire, EGR failure, air system failure, high oil consump-
tion, extreme lean operation and various combinations. Leaded fuel operation
was not chosen for consideration due to lack of emission measurement methods
for halogen compounds at the time this project was initiated. Therefore, the
use of leaded fuel remains as an undetermined potential area of concern. High
oil consumption was not chosen as a candidate malfunction since high oil con-
sumption received considerable coverage in the preceeding malfunction projects.
Extreme lean operation was not selected as a candidate malfunction since it
had been found to produce unacceptable driveability in the previous projects.
All of the candidate malfunction conditions were evaluated in either the mal-
function screening or the vehicle testing phases of this project.
E. Vehicle Testing
The automobile involved in this study was tested in the unmodified con-
figuration (i.e., tuned-up to manufacturer's specifications) and in each of
four malfunction conditions. The test sequence included the Light-Duty Fed-
eral Test Procedure (FTP)^) t the Congested Freeway Driving Schedule (SET)(5>,
and the Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (HFET).^ Preconditioning of
the vehicle prior to testing was conducted in accordance with the 55 mph
Alternate Mileage Accumulation Procedure.^ To the extent practical, all
specified unregulated exhaust constituents were sampled and analyzed during
every test. In addition, the regulated emissions were measured in each con-
figuration using four short-test procedures.
-------
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATION AND PROCEDURES
This section describes the vehicle, the fuel and lubricant, the facilities
and the general instrumentation and procedures utilized in this project. The
overall sampling systems for the unregulated emissions are also discussed.
A. Vehicle
One new, gasoline-powered automobile was evaluated in this project. This
automobile (car) is described in Table 1 and is shown in subsequent Figure 2.
The car was leased from a local San Antonio leasing agency and came equipped
with the normally obtained options, such as automatic transmission and steel-
belted radial tires. This car came equipped with the standard rear-axle ratio
and standard size tires.
TABLE 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE AUTOMOBILE EVALUATED
Vehicle
Year
1979
Make
Mercury
Model
Marquis
Body
Type
4-dr
ID or
Serial Number
92662H637731
GVWR,
2435
Emission Controls
Engine
CID/Cyl Family Catalyst Pump EGR
351/8 5.8HBV2TT95x95 3-way+Oxi.a Yes Yes
Fuel Control System Chassis Dynamometer Settings13
Oxygen Inertia, Power,
Fuel Control Sensor kg (Ibs.) kw (hp)c
Feed-back carb. Yes 2040 (4500) 8.9 (12.0)
Note: Automobile was equipped with automatic transmission,
air conditioning, and steel-belted radial tires
Three-way catalyst followed by an oxidation catalyst
Same as setting used in EPA certification of the automobile
Includes the increase for air conditioning
-------
B. Fuel and Lubricant
Throughout this project a single batch of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 unleaded gasoline,
the type provided to auto manufacturers for emissions durability tests, -was
used for all testing. This gasoline, described in Table 2, was made in accord-
ance with the specifications outlined in MSAPC Advisory Circular No. A/C 25B1
and contained no measurable manganese. The hydrogen to carbon ratio was 1.89
and the SwRI identification number was EM-344.
The engine lubricant used throughout this project was Exxon Uniflow 10W40
motor oil. This motor oil, in addition to having a significant sales volume,
contained an additive for reducing engine friction. Indications at the time
this motor oil was initially selected were that many or most major motor oil
manufacturers were planning to incorporate friction additives into their motor
oils.
C. Dynamometer and CVS System
A Clayton Model ECE-50 chassis dynamometer with a belt-driven variable-
inertia flywheel system, was utilized for all transient testing. The belt-
driven inertia system simulates equivalent weight of vehicles from 680 kg
(1500 Ibs) to 2495 kg (5500 Ibs) in 115 kg (250 Ib) increments to 1360 kg and
225 kg increments above 1360 kg.
The constant volume sampler (CVS) used for these evaluations was SwRI
CVS Number 2. This unit has a nominal capacity of 9.2 mVmin (325 cfm) . A
nominal 460 mm (18 inch) diameter by 5 m (16 feet) long dilution tunnel was
used between the intake filter and the CVS to enable sampling of sulfates and
particulates.
Partial views of the chassis dynamometer, the dilution tunnel and the intake
to the CVS can be seen in subsequent Figure 2. Both the dynamometer and the
CVS were calibrated, maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions and the appropriate sections of the Code of Federal Regulations
applicable to light-duty vehicles.(4)
In addition to the 142 m /min (5000 cfm) cooling fan placed in front of the
automobile, 42 m /min (1500 cfm) blowers were available to cool each rear wheel
and to blow the heat from the exhaust pipe away from the automobile's gasoline
tank. These additional blowers were used only during the SET and HFET driving
cycles.
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis
A pictorial schematic of the exhaust and sampling system is shown in
Figure 1. This system is in accordance with the guidelines established in
various projects conducted at SwRI for the EPA. The major difference between
this system and similar systems used in other projects is the number of sampling
probes and systems required to collect all of the required unregulated emission
samples. This is illustrated in the several views of the system shown in Figure
2. View A shows an overall view of the entire system in operation during an
-------
(Bags)
HC, CO, NOX, C02,
Individual HC
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
Exhaust
Out
(Filters)
Particulate
Sulfate (BCA)
Metals and Other Elements
CVS
Constant
Volume
Sampler
Filtered
Air In
I
^C 460 i
-> r <
nm (18")I.D. _/ ^ XT
-*" 11
Orifice Mixing X
Plate
Oxygen *•=
\
(Traps and Impingers)
DMNA
COS + Sulfides
HCN
Amraines
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Hydrogen Sulfide
t
Exhaust
from
Automobile
Figure 1. Gasoline engine emissions sampling system
-------
A. Entire Sampling System
B. Regulated Emissions
C. CVS Side of System
D. Dynamometer Side of System
Figure 2. Views of the emissions sampling system
-------
TABLE 2. DESCRIPTION OF CHEVRON UL-CQ26B1 UNLEADED GASOLINE
Availability Date
Tank No .
Gallons
Gravity, °API at 60°F
Research Octane No.
Motor Octane No.
Sensitivity
Lead, g/Gal .
Sulfur, Wt %
Phosphorus , g/Gal .
Manganese , g/Gal .
Gum, mg/100 mJl
Unwashed
Washed
Reid Vapor Pressure, psi
Distillation, °F
(% Evaporated) __
IBP
10%
50%
90%
EP
Recovery, %
Residue, %
Loss, %
Acidity of Residue
Hydrocarbons, Vol. %
Aromatics
Olefins
Saturates
Test Method
ASTM D 1298
ASTM D 2699
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 3237
X-Ray - ASTM
D 2622 (Modified)
ASTM D 3231
EAM 128-74
ASTM D 381
ASTM D 323
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 1093
ASTM D 1319
April 24, 1978
94
801,901
58.4
91.6
83.2
8.4
0.001
0.029
0.0002
0.001
85
0
8.9
97
129
212
328
386
97.5
1.0
1.5
Pass
28
8
64
Benzene, Vol. %
Water and Sediment, Vol. %
Oxidation Stability, Hr.
Copper Corrosion
Chevron Research
Technique
ASTM D 2709
ASTM D 525
ASTM D 130
2.0
<0.001
24+
1A
Note: These inspection data were provided by the Chevron Research Company.
-------
actual test. View B shows the system used to continuously record the dilute
HC, CO, NOX, and CC>2, the 02 in raw exhaust, and the catalyst temperature.
Views C and D show a significant portion of the sampling systems for the
unregulated emissions.
This section has described the dilution tunnel and provided some in-
sight into the overall sampling system assembly. More details on each of the
individual sampling systems for the unregulated emissions are given in Section
III of this final report.
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions and Engine Parameters
Bagged samples of the dilute exhaust were evaluated for HC, CO, NO , and
CO2 using SwRI Bag Cart Number 1. This bag cart was designed, calibrated and
operated in accordance with the appropriate sections of the Code of Federal
Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.<4)
In addition, the levels of dilute HC, CO, NOX and CO2 were recorded
continuously on a strip chart recorder. These dilute emissions are automati"
cally engine exhaust flow-weighted, and provide a better insight into variability
of mass emissions during cyclic procedures than would be provided by continuous
direct emission measurement. Other items continuously recorded were the ve-
hicle speed, the oxygen level in the undiluted exhaust and the catalyst exit
temperature. The instrumentation used for these continuously recorded data
were as follows:
Parameter
Measured
HC
CO
NOX
C02
02
Temp.
<3no«^H
Type
FID
NDIR
CL
NDIR
Po 1 aro graph i c
Instrument or Method
Make & Model
SwRI No. 007
Beckman 31 5B
Thermo Electron 12A
Beckman 315B
Beckman 715
Ranges Used
100 through 3200
0.3, 0.6 & 1.5%
100 & 1000 ppm
6%
5 & 25%
ppm
These continuously recorded data were used for obtaining the catalyst
maximum temperature and in helping to resolve any problems or questions
occurring with the other test data. In addition, these data remain available
in the event they may be useful in clarifying future findings.
The catalyst average temperature and the average oxygen level in the un-
diluted exhaust were obtained using Acromag 1324-LY-l integrators. The
average oxygen level (and to some extent the catalyst temperatures) was de-
termined to have only a gross relative meaning for most of these evaluations.
Oftentimes, the oxygen level was relatively high when the exhaust flow was
low (e.g., idle and cut-throttle) and relatively low when the exhaust flow
was relatively high (e.g., highway speed). The integration of the oxygen in
the undiluted exhaust does not compensate for these changes in exhaust flow.
It is possible to have a significant average oxygen level and yet be deficient
in oxygen over some portions of the driving cycle. Therefore, the average
-------
oxygen level serves only as a general indicator of the malfunction condition
(e.g., average oxygen level decreases somewhat for rich operation). Catalyst
temperatures were effected by the placement of the thermocouples and the
cooling fans.
F. Emissions Test and Mileage Accumulation Procedures
The primary procedures and driving schedules utilized in this project are
defined as follows:
(4)
FTP - 1979 Federal Test Procedure
(uses the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule)
SET - Congested Freeway Driving Schedule
HFET - Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule
HDDS - Modified Durability Driving Schedule )
(with all WOT Accelerations changed to normal
Accelerations) . This procedure is described in
Appendix A-l .
Each of the three primary procedures and schedules, requiring emissions testing
in this project (FTP, SET and HFET), utilized bagged samples for evaluation of
regulated emissions and fuel consumption. In addition, evaluation of the
regulated emissions were conducted using several short- test procedures. These
short- test procedures are discussed in Section II. H.
The SET and the HFET are both hot-start, single-segment driving cycles.
The FTP, however, involves cold-start and hot-start, multi-cycle with multi-
segment operation. In addition, in this project, a four-bag FTP was utilized
for most of the unregulated emissions; rather than the three-bag FTP specified
in the Federal Test Procedure. Therefore, before proceding, it is important
to clarify the meaning of FTP as used in this project:
FTP - The FTP uses the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS)
which is 1372 seconds in duration. The UDDS, in turn, is divided into two
segments; the first having 505 seconds and the second having 867 seconds. The
Federal Test Procedure consists of a cold-start 505 and a stabilized 867 fol-
lowed by a hot-start 505. In this project, the hot 505 was followed by another
867 segment. For the remainder of this discussion, and throughout this report,
the four-cycle FTP will be identified as presented on the following page.
Therefore, with the assumption that the changes in distance traveled are
negligible, the composite results with the four-cycle FTP relative to results
with the three-cycle FTP will differ only as the mass emissions emitted
during Cycle 4 differ from that emitted during Cycle 2. An assumption made,
that the overall effect of such differences were relatively minor, was vali-
dated in the Task 1 evaluations under EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
The test sequence followed for each automobile is given in Table 3.
-------
Four-Cycle FTP
Cycle
Duration, seconds
Regulated Emissions, 3-Bag
Regulated Emissions, 4-Bag
Unregulated Emissions:
Bag
Impinger
Trap (Except DMNA)
Trap DMNA
Cold
1
505
X
X
X
UDDS
2
867
X
X
X
X
X
Hot
3
505
X
X
X
X
X
UDDS
4
867
X
X
X
NOTE: X designates a sample taken
A composite value in mass per distance for the three-cycle, three
sample FTP regulated emissions is calculated using the following
formula:
MASS
_ 0.43 x (MASS 1 + MASS 2) + 0.57 * (MASS 3 + MASS 2)
~
DISTANCE 0.43 * (DIST. 1 + DIST. 2) + 0.57 x (DIST. 3 + DIST. 2)
Assuming Distance 3 is equal to Distance 1, this equation can be
reduced to :
3-FTP M/D -
0.43 x (Ml + M2) + 0.57 x (M3 + M2)
Dl + D2
For the four-cycle FTP, two sample, composite values determined in
this project, the following formula was used:
MASS = 0.43 * M(l + 2) + 0.57 x M(3 + 4)
DISTANCE ~ 0.43 X (Dl + D2) + 0.57 X (D3 + D4)
Assuming Distance 3 is equal to Distance 1 and Distance 4 is equal
to Distance 2, then this equation can be reduced to:
4-FTP M/D - °'43 * M(l + 2) + 0.57 x M(3 + 4)
' Dl + D2
10
-------
TABLE 3. TEST SEQUENCE FOR EACH MALFUNCTION
Sequence Operation Performed on Vehicle
upon receipt
1
7
8
Tune-up to manufacturer's specifications.
Precondition for 1600 km (995 mi) using
the MODS
Run FTP, SET, HFET - Sample and analyze appli-
cable Task 2 compounds.
Precondition for 200 km (125 mi) using
the HDDS
Modify to operate in a Task 1 malfunction
condition.
Precondition for 100 km (62 mi) using
the MDDS
Run FTP, SET, HFET: FTP, SET, HFET - Sample
and analyze applicable Task 2 compounds.
Run Short Cycle Procedures.
Collect Pallflex filter sample over three
FTP cycles (6 each UDDS).
Return to unmodified condition, replace the
catalyst, and tune-up to manufacturer's
specifications.
FTP - Federal Test Procedure
SET - Congested Freeway Driving Schedule
HFET - Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule
MDDS - Modified Durability Driving Schedule
11
-------
Sequences 1 through 7 were repeated for each of four malfunction conditions
on each automobile. The sequence followed in the laboratory for running one
set of emissions tests (FTP, SET and HFET) is given in Table 4.
The parameters of the three primary driving schedules, along with the
two short-test driving cycles, are summarized in Table 5 and these schedules
are illustrated in Figure 3. Other driving schedule designations frequently
used are as follows:
Driving Schedule Other Common
Designation Used Designations
FTP LA-4 and UDDS
SET CFDS and SET-7
HFET FET
NYCC SET-8
G. Test Numbering System
The numbering system, established for the various related unregulated
emissions projects being conducted at this laboratory, consist of six digits.
One of the digits was not required for this project so a dash (-) was used
in its place. The designation used for all vehicle testing, subsequent to
the malfunction screening evaluation, was PVM-ST. The meaning of each letter
or group of letters is described as follows:
As used for
Description this project
PV Vehicle Designation
P Project 5
V Vehicle 1
M- Condition Tested
M Malfunction 1 through 4
- Space not used in this project -
S Test Series (Unmodified or Malfunction 1 through 3
T Individual Test (FTP, SET or HFET) 1 through 3
(NYCC, FSC, TSIT or FTM) 4 through 7
The PV is used to identify the vehicle tested
In this project, the test condition is sufficiently
identified by one digit so the M, followed by a dash
(-), was used to identify the specific malfunction
conditions.
The S designates the test series (FTP, SET, HFET) where:
1 = Unomdified vehicle
2 & 3 = Initial and repeat test in a malfunction
configuration
The T designates the individual test conducted where:
1 - FTP, 2 = SET and 3 = HFET
12
-------
TABLE 4. LABORATORY TEST SEQUENCE
1. Precondition, UDDS
2. Soak 12 to 20 hours
3. FTP - 4 bags for gaseous emissions
2 filter or impinger samples
4. Soak 20 minutes - Fan Off
5. Precondition first 505 seconds of UDDS
5. Idle 1 minutes (± 15 seconds)
(a) auto, trans. - drive
(b) start additional cooling blowers
(c) place filter holder in tunnel
7. SET - 1 bag sample
1 filter or impinger sample
8. Engine Off - 10 minutes - Fan Off
9. HFET - 1 bag sample
1 filter or impinger sample
NOTE: 5000 cfm fan on during all car operation.
Additional tire and fuel tank cooling
blovers on during all SET and HFET operation.
13
-------
TABLE 5. SUMMARY OF DRIVING SCHEDULE PARAMETERS
FTP:
505
867
UDDS
SET
HFET
Short-Cycle
NYCC
FSC
Duration ,
Seconds
505
867
1372
1398
765
Procedures
599
125
Distance,
Kilometers
5.8
6.2
12.0
21.7
16.5
1.91
1.21
Average
km/hr
—
—
31.4
56.0
77-6
11.5
34.9
Speed
mph
—
—
19.5
34.8
48.2
7.1
21.7
14
-------
100
80
X
e
60'
40
20
.TRANSIENT
PHASE
STABILIZED
PHASE
200
400
600 800
TIME, sec
1000
1200
1371
100
80
60
40
20
0
60
40
20
200
400
600 800
TIME, sec
1000
1200
1398
_d
X
s
100
80
60
40
20
0
60
40
' j:
x
•H
. e
20
0
200
400
TIME, sec
600
765
100
80
^ 60
40
20
0
60
40
' .c
X
•H
. e
20
•
0
NYCC
• wm. A
200 400
TIME, sec
600
>
100
80
60
40
20
60
40
• e
20
FSC
0 12
TIME, sec
Figure 3. Driving cycle speed vs time traces.
15
-------
H. Short-Test Procedures
Regulated emissions were also evaluated over four short-test procedures.
These procedures, described in Appendix A-2, are defined as follows:
NYCC - New York City Cycle
FSC - Federal Short Cycle
TSIT - Two Speed Idle Test
FTM - Federal Three Mode
The parameters for the NYCC and the FSC were given in previous Table 5 and
the schedules were illustrated in Figure 3. All of these short-test pro-
cedures are conducted with the engine in a warmed-up operating condition.
The NYCC involves a lot of idle and low-speed operation and has an average
speed of only about one-third that of the FTP. Emissions evaluations with
the two driving cycles involved bagged samples of CVS diluted exhaust.
The TSIT and FTM are steady-state procedures involving measurement of the
concentrations of HC, CO, and NO in the raw exhaust. HC was measured by non-
dispersive infrared in units of ppm hexane. Nitric oxide was measured using
a cherniluminescence analyzer, without the sample going through the converter.
Measurement of NO rather than NOX was specified. Also, with high concentra-
tions of carbon monoxide and/or hydrocarbons in the exhaust, passage through
the converter generally results in erroneous values for oxides of nitrogen.
This factor has been well documented and reported in a number of previous
projects.
The operating sequence followed for the short- test procedures is given
in Table 6. Specified instrument ranges, for the undiluted emissions measured
during steady-state evaluations were as follows:
HC - 0-100 or 0-200 and 0-2000 ppm (Hexane)
CO - 0-0.5% and 0-10%
NO - 0-100, 0-1000, 0-2500 and 0-4000
Ranges as near as practical to these specified ranges were used.
I. Tallflex Filter Samples
Upon completion of a malfunction test series, a 20-cm by 25-cm (8" x
10") Type T60A20 Pallflex filter sample of diluted exhaust was taken for BaP
and possible bioassay analyses at the EPA. The Pallflex filter samples were
taken using a high-volume sampling system with a nominal sample flow rate of
0.85 standard mvmin (30 scfm). The 8.9-cm (3.5-inch) inside diameter sampling
probe required the use of an 18-inch diameter dilution tunnel. Available CVS
flow rates for use in these evaluations were 9 and 14 standard m3/min (300 and
500 scfm). A flow rate was selected which would keep the sample temperature
at the Pallflex filter below 43"C (110°F).
16
-------
TABLE 6. SEQUENCE FOR SHORT-TEST PROCEDURES
DILUTE EMISSIONS TESTING - CVS
1. Check Inertia and Horsepower (Use same values as for FTP)
2. Run 505 Seconds of the FTP
3. Idle 6 minutes in Neutral with Fan On
4. RUN (NYCC) & COLLECT BAG
5. idle 6 minutes in Neutral with Fan On
6. RUN (FSC) & COLLECT BAG - Use 1 CFM High Volume Sampler
RAW EMISSIONS TESTING - HC AND CO BY NDIR, NO OR NOX BY CL
7. Idle 6 minutes in Neutral with Fan On
8. RUN TWO SPEED IDLE TEST (TSIT) - Three minutes per mode
a. 2500 rpra in Neutral - measure during minutes 2 through 3
b. Normal Idle in Neutral - measure during minutes 2 through 3
9. Continue Normal Idle for 6 minutes Total
10. Set Inertia at 1750 pounds (795 kg)
11. RUN FEDERAL THREE MODE (FTM)
Minute 1 - Set 18.0* Horsepower at 52 mph (84/km/h)
2 - Stabilize
3 - Measure Emissions
Minute 4 - Set 9.5* Horsepower at 25 mph (40 km/h)
5 - Stabilize
6 - Measure Emissions
Minute 7 - Idle in Neutral
8 - Stabilize
9 - Measure Emissions
*Dynamometer horsepower setting as determined from
a special chart provided (Based on NADA weight +
181 kg (400 Ibs.))
17
-------
The same filter was used throughout a cold-start 12-bag FTP (6 each UDDS).
After weighing each filter, following sampling, the filters were sealed in a
bag and stored in a freezer at minus 18 degrees centigrade (0°F). All pro-
cessing on the filters was conducted under yellow light. The analyses of
these filters were not included as a part of this project and are not dis-
cussed in this report.
J. Computational Methods
The methods used for calculating the unregulated emissions results are
given in Appendix A-3. All regulated emissions were calculated using the . .
methods prescribed in the Code of Federal Regulations for Light-Duty Vehicles.
On the computer printouts for the regulated emissions, included in Appendices
B and E, all items of potential interest are identified by descriptive headings.
Items on the computer sheet identified only by abbreviated headings are used
in calculating the unregulated emissions.
18
-------
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
The analytical procedures used to measure the unregulated emissions
are summarized in this section. A detailed description of the procedures,
along with a discussion of their development, validation, and qualification,
is available in Interim Report II, "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing
Unregulated Pollutant Emissions From Motor Vehicles," developed in a related
EPA project.^3*
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures
The unregulated emissions evaluated in this project, along with the
methods for sampling and the procedures used in the analyses, are listed
in Table 7. Organic amines, aldehydes and ketones, organic sulfides,
individual hydrocarbons, and metals and other elements represent groups
of compounds. The respective procedures separate and identify a number
of individual compounds -within each of these groups. The analytical
procedures involved in this project are briefly described as follows:
Organic Amines - The collection of organic amines (monomethylamine,
monoethylamine and dimethylamines, trimethylamines, diethylamine, and
triethylamines) is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through
glass impingers containing dilute sulfuric acid. The amines are complexed
by the acid to form stable sulfate salts which remain in solution. A portion
of this solution is then injected into a gas chromatograph equipped with an
ascarite loaded pre-column and a nitrogen phosphorus detector (NPD). External
amine standards in dilute sulfuric acid are used to quantify the results.
Some analyses were also conducted using undiluted exhaust.
Ammonia - Ammonia in CVS diluted automotive exhaust is measured in
the protonated form, NH4+, after collection in dilute H2SO4. The acidi-
fication is carried out in a glass impinger maintained at ice bath
temperature. A sample from the impinger is then analyzed for ammonia
in an Ion Chromatograph and the concentration in the exhaust is calculated
by comparison to an ammonium sulfate standard solution.
Aldehydes and Ketones - The collection of aldehydes (formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde and hexanaldehyde) and ketones (acetone
and methylethyIketone) is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust
through glass impingers containing 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) in
dilute hydrochloric acid. The aldehydes and ketones (also known as
carbonyl compounds) react with the DNPH to form their respective phenyl-
hydrazone derivatives. These derivatives are insoluble or only slightly
soluble in the DNPH/HC1 solution and are removed by filtration followed
by pentane extractions. The filtered precipitate and the pentane extracts
are combined and then the pentane is evaporated in a vacuum oven. The
19
-------
TABLE 7. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
Compound
Organic Amines
Ammonia (NH^)
Aldehydes and Ketones
Hydrogen Sulfide (S)
Total Cyanide [Hydrogen
Cyanide (HCN) and
Cyanogen
Carbonyl Sulfide (COS)
and Organic Sulfides
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
Nickel Carbonyl
(Ni(CO)4)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Metals and Other
Elements
Particulates
Sulfate
DMNA
Sampling Method of Analysis
Impinger Gas chromatograph with ascarite
pre-column and nitrogen-phosphorus
detector (GC-NPD).
Impinger Ion chromatograph
Impinger Dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative.
Gas chromatograph with flame
ionization detector.
Impinger Methylene blue derivative.
Spectrophotometer.
Impinger Cyanogen chloride derivative. Gas
chromatograph with electron capture
detector (GC-ECD).
Trap Gas chromatograph with flame
photometric detector (GC-FPD).
Bag Gas chromatograph with electron
capture detector (GC-ECD).
Bag Chemiluminescence (CL).
Bag Gas chromatograph with flame
ionization detector.
Filter Weighed using microbalance.
Spectral X-ray analysis at RTP.
Filter Weighed using microbalance.
Filter Barium chloranilate derivative
(BCA). Liquid chromatograph with
ultraviolet detector.
Trap Gas chromatograph with mass
spectrometer at RTI (GC-MS).
20
-------
remaining dried extract contains the phenylhydrazone derivatives. The
extract is dissolved in a quantitative volume of toluene containing a
known amount of anthracene as an internal standard. A portion of this
dissolved extract is injected into a gas chromatograph and analyzed using
a flame ionization detector.
Hydrogen Sulfide - The collection of hydrogen sulfide is accomplished
by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through glass impingers containing a
buffered zinc acetate solution which traps the sulfide ion as zinc sulfide.
The absorbing solution is then treated with N,N-dimethyl-paraphenylene
diamine sulfate and ferric ammonium sulfate. Cyclization occurs, forming
the highly colored heterocyclic compound methylene blue (3,9-bisdimethyl-
aminophenazothionium sulfate). The resulting solution is analyzed with
a spectrophotometer at 667 nm in a 1-cm or 4-cm pathlength cell depending
upon the concentration.
Total Cyanide (Hydrogen Cyanide plus Cyanogen) - The collection of total
cyanide is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through glass
impingers containing a 1.0 N potassium hydroxide absorbing solution. This
solution is maintained at ice bath temperature. An aliquot of the absorbing
reagent is then treated with KI^PC^ and Chloramine-T. A portion of the
resulting cyanogen chloride is injected into a gas chromatograph equipped
with an electron capture detector (ECD). External CN~ standards are used to
quantify the results.
Carbonyl and Organic Sulfides - The collection of carbonyl sulfide
(COS) and the organic sulfides, methyl sulfide (dimethylsulfide, (CH3)2S),
ethyl sulfide (diethylsulfide, (C2H5)2S) and methyl disulfide (dimethyl-
disulfide, (CH3)2S2)/ is accomplished by passing CVS diluted exhaust through
Tenax GC traps at -76°C. At this temperature the traps remove the organic
sulfides from the dilute exhaust. The organic sulfides are thermally desorbed
from the traps into a gas chromatograph sampling system and injected into a
gas chromatograph equipped with a flame photometric detector for analysis.
External organic sulfide standards generated from permeation tubes are used
to quantify the results.
Nitrous Oxide - For measurement of nitrous oxide, a sample of the CVS
diluted exhaust is collected in a Tedlar bag. The bagged sample is then
analyzed for nitrous oxide using a gas chromatograph equipped with an electron
capture detector. Calibration blends are used to quantify the results. Gas
chromatograph peak areas are obtained using a Hewlett-Packard 3354 computer
system.
Nickel Carbonyl - Bagged samples of the CVS diluted exhaust are analyzed
for nickel carbonyl (Ni(CO)^) using a chemiluminescent NOX analyzer modified
with a No. 54 wratten filter. Bottled calibration blends are used to quantify
the results. The instrument has linear response between 0.1 ppb and 0.1 ppm.
Individual Hydrocarbons - For measurement of selected individual hydro-
carbons, methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), ethylene (C2H4), acetylene (C2H2),
propane (C3H8), propylene (C3Hg), benzene (C^H^), and toluene (C7HQ), a
sample of CVS diluted exhaust is collected in a Tedlar bag. This bagged
sample is then analyzed for individual hydrocarbons using a gas chromato-
21
-------
graphic system containing four separate columns and a flame ionization detector.
The peak areas are compared to an external calibration blend and the individual
hydrocarbon concentrations are obtained using a Hewlett-Packard 3354 computer
system.
Metals and Other Elements - The metals are collected as particulate on a
47-mm Fluoropore filter, which is then sent to Research Triangle Park (RTP) for
analysis by X-ray spectroscopy. The diluted exhaust sample is taken isokineti-
cally from wihtin the dilution tunnel. Weight gain on the filter is determined
by weighing the filter on a microbalance before and after sampling.
Particulate - The "particulate" is collected isokinetically on a 47-mm
glass fiber filter. The amount of "particulate" collected is determined by
weighing the filter on a microbalance before and after sampling.
Sulfate - Automotive exhaust is vented into a dilution tunnel where
it is mixed with a. flowing stream of filtered room air. In the tunnel/ the
303 reacts rapidly with water in the exhaust to form sulfuric acid aerosols.
The aerosols grow to a filterable size range within the tunnel and are
collected isokinetically on a fluorocarbon membrane filter. Particulate
sulfate salts are also collected on the filter.
Sulfuric acid collected on the filter is then converted to ammonium
sulfate by exposure to ammonia vapor. The soluble sulfates are leached
from the filter with a measured volume of an isopropyl alcohol - water
solution (60% IPA). A fixed volume of the sample extract is injected into
a high pressure liquid chromatograph (HPLC) and pumped through a column of
strong cation exchange resin in Ag+ form to scrub out the halides (Cl~, Br~)
and then through a column of strong cation exhange resin in H+ form to scrub
out the cations and convert the sulfate to sulfuric acid. Passage through
a reactor column of barium chloranilate crystals precipitates out barium
sulfate and releases the highly UV absorbing chloranilate ions. The amount
of chloranilate ions released is equivalent to the sulfate in the sample and
is measured by a sensitive liquid chromatograph UV detector at 310-313
nanometers. All the reactions and measurement take place in a flowing steam
of 60% IPA. The scrubber and reactor columns also function as efficient
filter media for any solid reaction products formed during passage of the
sample through the column system.
DMNA - The attempted measurement of N-nitrosodimethylamine was accomplished
by collecting dilute exhaust (approximately 185:1 total dilution) in Tenax
GC sampling cartridges and shipping the cartridges to Research Triangle
Institute (RTI) for analysis by capillary gas-liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The single ion monitoring (m/e 74) procedure used is not
specific to DMNA. Results using this procedure represent a total composite
value for all materials having background ions of m/e 74 and the same
retention time as DMNA. A second cartridge was provided to enable a full
scan analyses for any condition producing a relatively large indication of
22
-------
DMNA. Since this procedure was not included in Interim Report II (3), a. brief
description of this procedure is included in Appendix A-3 of this report.
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical Procedures
The analytical procedures used in this project were previously subjected
to a series of validation and qualification experiments. Validation experi-
ments included checks for sample stability, sample collection efficiency,
detector linearity, interferences, and analysis repeatability. The qualifi-
cation experiments included the injection of the compound of interest into the
tunnel with and without the presence of exhaust and the subsequent recovery of
that compound at the procedure sampling point.
Sample stability checks were performed using repeated analyses of the
same sample at intervals over a specified period of time and comparing the
results to the initial analysis. Organic amines, aldehydes and ketones,
ammonia, total cyanide, nitrous oxide and individual hydrocarbon samples
were found to be stable for several days. Carbonyl and organic sulfides and
the hydrogen sulfide samples were found to be stable for approximately one
day. Nickel carbonyl is stable for only a few hours.
Sample collection efficiency experiments were performed by passing a
known concentration of sample through a series of impingers or traps and
analyzing each impinger or trap individually for the compound of interest.
All procedures used in this project have a collection efficiency of 98% or
better. Detector linearity experiments were performed by preparing several
samples of various known concentrations and plotting the resulting peak
areas versus the concentrations. All the procedures had linear response over
the range of interest in this project.
To determine the interferences for each procedure, known exhaust components
were introduced into the sample to determine their effect on the resultant
measurements. To determine analysis repeatability, several samples of known
concentrations were prepared and a number of complete analyses were performed
at each concentration. The results of these tests were then compared to
determine analyses repeatability.
The qualification experiments were performed to determine if the
compounds of interest could travel the length of the dilution tunnel in the
presence of dilute exhaust without significant loss by reaction with exhaust
or the tunnel itself. The compounds were introduced at the same point at which
the exhaust enters the tunnel and were sampled at the normal sampling point.
Table 8 lists the procedures for which validation and qualification experi-
ments were performed.
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedures
A difficult, but very important, endeavor was the determination of
procedural accuracy for each analytical method. The primary difficulty
involved those procedures in which the exhaust compounds are trapped or
absorbed, an extraction or subsequent reaction is performed, and then a
portion of the extraction is analyzed. After much consideration, in the
previous malfunction project, the decision was reached to initially define
23
-------
TABLE 8. PROCEDURAL VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION
Compound or Validation
Compound Group Conducted
Organic Amines Yes
Ammonia Yes
Aldehydes and Ketones Yes
Hydrogen Sulfide Yes
Total Cyanide Yes
Carbonyl Sulfide and Yes
Organic Sulfides
Nitrous Oxide Yes
Nickel Carbonyl Yes
individual Hydrocarbons Yes
Metals and Other Elements No
Particulates No
Sulfate Nob
DMNA No°
_ Qualification Conducted _
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes
Noa
Nob
No
No
No
Compound considered too dangerous to perform qualification experiments,
Established procedure.
"Performed at RTF and RTI.
24
-------
the accuracy in terms of a "minimum detection value" (MDV). The MDV, as
used in this report, is defined as the value above which it can be said that
the compound has been detected in the exhaust (i.e., the accuracy is equal
to plus or minus the MDV at a measured value equal to the MDV). Determin-
ation of accuracy over the entire range of each procedure was beyond the scope
of these projects.
For compounds collected by bag samples, the MDV was determined from
the instrument detection limits only and is independent of the sampling
rate and duration. For compounds which are concentrated in impingers or
traps, the MDV is dependent on the instrument detection limit, chemical
workup, sampling rate and sampling duration. The MDV's listed in Table 9
were derived using the listed sampling rates and a 23-minute sampling period.
25
-------
TABLE 9. EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Mol.
Wt.
Procedural
Minimum
Sample yg/m3 Detection
Flow per Valuesa
Vmin ppm ppm yg/m
MDV
for
FTP,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., VlOO km
°C
°C
32.00
44.01
Bag
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC)
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
11.88
28.01
46.01
Bag
Bag
Bag
575
1165
1915
1.0C
2.0C
0.5C
575
2330
958
10
40
16
96.01
14.0
14.0
4.0
Bag
0.13
4.0
4000 <0.01
<50
6
0.1
=0.5
=0.5
=0.05
=0.1
17.03
26.02
74.08
34.08
107.75
44.02
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
Bag
Bag
710
1080
3080
1415
7100
1830
0.01
0.01
—
0.01
0.0001
0.01
7
11
—
14
0.7
18
0.1
0.2
—
0.2
0.01
0.3
Based on a 23-minute sampling period at the specified flow rate for all
impinger, filter and trap collected samples.
Based on yg/m3 in the diluted exhaust and typical UDDS (FTP 505 & 866)
parameters (1371 seconds, 10 D.F., 206 m3 CVS flow, 12.07 km, 0.98 DSFC)
mg/km for FTP = yg/m3 x 206 T- 12.07 x 0.98 x 0.001 « 0.0168 x yg/m3. For
SET: mg/km = 0.55 x mg/km for FTP. For HFET: mg/km = 0.74 x mg/km for FTP.
Based on the instrument ranges generally used in this project.
26
-------
TABLE 9 (CONT'D). EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone6
I sobutyr aldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Mol.
Wt.
30.03
44.05
58.08
72.12
70.09
100.16
106.13
16.04
28.05
30.07
26.04
44.11
42.08
78.12
92.15
CRCd
Synonym
—
—
2-Propanone
—
2-Butanone
2-Butenal
Hexanal
—
—
Ethene
•
Ethyne
--
Propene
—
—
yg/m3
per
Ppm
1250
1830
2415
3000
3000
2915
4165
4415
665
1165
1250
1085
1835
1750
3245
3830
Procedural
Minimum
Detection
Values3
ppm
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
—
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
iig/rt?
15
20
25
30
30
—
40
—
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
MDV
for
FTP,
mg/kmb
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
—
0.7
—
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylaminef
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
60.08
62.13
90.19
94.20
—
Dimethyl
Dimethyl
Dimethyl
2500
2585
3750
3915
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
3
3
4
4
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.06
31.06
45.09
59.11
73.14
101.19
Amino-Methane
Amino-Ethane
1290
1875
2460
3040
4205
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
3
4
5
6
8
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.10
0.14
a & b
See initial page of this table.
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th Edition.
Includes Acrolein - 56.07 and Propionaldehyde - 58.08 (CRC - Propenal and
Propanal respectively).
Includes Dimethylamine - 45.09.
27
-------
IV. MALFUNCTION SELECTION AND SCREENING EVALUATIONS
Prior to starting the vehicle testing phase, on the automobile acquired
for this project, a short series of tests were conducted. The purpose of
these tests was to provide data toward selection of the four malfunction con-
ditions. This section discusses the initial selection of malfunction condi-
tions along with the results of the actual laboratory malfunction screening
evaluations.
A. Selection of Malfunction Conditions
The 1979 Ford/Mercury Shop Manual was reviewed to determine operation
of the Electronic Engine Control System (E.E.C. II) and provide input toward
selection of potential malfunction conditions. The E.E.C. II consists of a
Monitoring System, an Electronic Control Assembly and the Emission Control
System. The control system can alter EGR flow, ignition timing, thermactor
air flow and carburetor air/fuel ratio. A functional diagram of the E.E.C.
II, adapted from the Shop Manual, is shown in Figure 4.
The Monitoring System consists of six sensor assemblies that monitor
the following conditions:
Sensor Condition Monitored
ECT Engine Coolant Temperature
TP Throttle Position
CP Crankshaft Position
EGP Oxygen Level in the Exhaust Gases
BMAP Barometric Pressure and Manifold Absolute Pressure
EVP EGR Valve Pintle Position
The Electronic Control Assembly (EGA) is a microcomputer which consists
of a processor assembly and a calibration assembly. The processor assembly
samples and processes the seven sensor input signals and sends control signals
to the EGR, ignition and thermactor air systems and the feedback carburetor.
The calibration assembly contains the "memory" and the programmed calibration
information for the processor assembly.
The Emission Control System consists of a throttle kicker, exhaust gas
recirculation (EGR), thermactor air, canister purge and ignition systems, and
the feedback carburetor actuator (FBCA). The thermactor system is comprised
of an air supply pump, an air bypass/diverter valve, air control solenoids,
an exhaust check valve and dual catalytic converters. The following cutaway
view of the dual catalytic converter and the description is taken directly
from the Shop Manual.
28
-------
CRANKSHAFT POSITION-
(CP) SENSOR
THERMACTOR
AIH CONTROL —
SOLENOIDS
THERMACTOn
BYPASS/OWERTER VALVE
THEBMACTOR
AIR PUMP
IGNITION
COIL
ENGINE COOLANT
TEMPERATURE
IECT) SENSOR
BAROMETRIC AND
MANIFOLD ABSOLUTE
PRESSURE IB/MAPI
SENSOR
THROTTLE POSITION
(TPI SENSOR
EGR VALVE POSITION
(EVP) SENSOR
/• EXHAUST C,AS OXYGEN
(EGO) SENSOR
EEC II CONTROL
ASSEMBLY
DUAL EGR
CONTROL SOLENOIDS
EGR SYSTEM
VENT (EGRV)
AND CONTROL
(EGRC)
SOLENOID/VALVES
THROTTLE KICKER
SOLENOID (TKSI
OUR A SPARK
IGNITION MODULE
FEEDBACK
CARBURETOR
ACTUATOR (FBCA)
IGNITION MODULE
SIGNAL (IMS)
THERMACTOR AIR
DIVEHTCH (TAD) AND
THCF1MACTOR AIR
RYPASSITAn)
r.OLCNOID/VALVI.S
Figure 4. Functional Diagram of the E.E.C. II
29
-------
MIXING CHAMBER
(MIDfiED)
SHELL ASSY.
f=x:lAUST GASES
F»OM ENGINE
FLOW
CONVENTIONAL OXIDATION
CATALYST ICOO
SECONDARY AIR
INLET FITTING
THREE-WAV CATALYST
(TWO
AIR FROM
THERMACTOR PUMP
A-4491-2A
"The cutaway view shows the two separate catalytic
converters, each composed of a ceramic "honeycomb" coated
with catalytic meterial. The front converter is coated
with a rhodium/platinum catalyst designed to control oxides
of nitrogen (NOX), unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon
monoxide (CO), and this is therefore called a "three-way
catalyst" (TWC). The rear converter is coated with platinum
catalyst and is called a "conventional oxidation catalyst"
(COC) converter. The platinum catalyst is also sometimes
called a "two-way catalyst" because it only acts on two of
major pollutants, HC and CO."
The unmodified configuration and a number of the single component mal-
functions, applicable to this system, are described as follows:
Unmodified Configuration - Engine tuned-up to manufacturer's specifi-
cations.
Disconnect Engine Coolant Temperature Sensor (Disabled Engine CTS) -
The EGA would not be provided with an indication of when the coolant tempera-
ture reaches a preset temperature and would continue to call for a fuel-rich
mixture.
Disable the Throttle Position Sensor (Disabled TPS) - The EGA would
not be provided with an indication of the throttle position (e.g., whether
the engine is operating at a closed, part or wide-open throttle).
Disconnect the Exhaust Oxygen Sensor (Disabled 02 Sensor) - Fuel con-
trol system would operate in a preset mode without feedback control.
30
-------
Disable the Barometric and Absolute Manifold Pressure Sensor (Dis-
abled BMAP) - The signal from this sensor is used to determine part-throttle
spark advance, EGR flow rate and air/fuel ratio.
Disable the EGR Valve Position Sensor (Disabled EGR Sensor) - The EGA
would not be provided with an indication of the EGR valve position and the
EGR valve would remain inoperable.
Disable the EGR Valve (Disabled EGR Valve) - No EGR would be provided
to the engine.
Continuous Bypass of Thennactor Air (Air to Bypass) - The air supply
would be bypassed into the atmosphere rather than into the exhaust system.
This condition normally occurs when the control vacuum to the diverter valve
drops below a preset value.
Continuous Upstream of Thgrmactqr Air (Air to Manifold) - Additional
air would always be injected into the exhaust manifold.
Continuous Downstream of Thennactor Air (Air to Catalyst) - Additional
air would always be injected into the dual catalytic converter between the
three-way and the oxidation catalysts.
Feedback Carburetor Actuator Disabled in Engine Start Position (Dis-
abled FCA in Start) - The actuator would remain in a calibration dependent
initial position.
Limited Operational Strategy Mode (LOS Mode) - Engine would operate
with some of the output commands cutoff.
Engine Ignition Misfire (12 percent misfire) - Effectively random
misfire of 12 percent of the ignition pulses.
In addition to these malfunctions, there are various potential multi-
component malfunction configurations.
There were considerably more potential malfunctions than the up to
seven malfunctions to be involved in the screening evaluations. Some of
these potential malfunctions, however, could result in unacceptable drive-
ability or have only a minor effect on emissions. Therefore, the approach
followed was to initially make a cursory determination of regulated emissions
and driveability in one hot-start, four-cycle FTP evaluation for each con-
dition. (Cold start was also evaluated at several of the conditions where
cold-start difficulties were anticipated).
Results of these preliminary malfunction screening evaluations are
grouped and summarized in Table 10. The first group of malfunction con-
ditions in Table 11 produced emissions not very significantly different
from that produced in the unmodified configuration. The second group pro-
duced significantly higher NOX and the third group produced significantly
higher HC and/or CO. These results were utilized in the selection of the
seven configurations to undergo more extensive malfunction screening evalu-
ations.
31
-------
TABLE 10. PRELIMINARY MALFUNCTION SCREENING RESULTS
Four-Cycle FTP Emissions, g/km
Cold-Start Hot-Start
Configuration HC CO NO __HC_ CO
Unmodified 0.1 1 0.8 0.1 1
Disabled TPS — <0.1 <1 0.6
Air to Catalyst 0.2 2 0.6 0.1 <1 0.5
Air to Manifold — <0.1 <1 0.8
Disabled BMAP — 0.1 2 0.8
12 Percent Misfire 0.4 1 0.5 0.1 <1 0.3
LOS Mode — <0.1 <1 1.6
Disabled EGR Valve — 0.1 <1 1.6
Disabled EGR Sensor — 0.1 <1 2.0
Disabled O2 Sensor 0.1 1 2.7 <0.1 <1 2.8
Air to Bypass 0.4 7 0.6 0.2 4 0.5
Disabled Engine CTS — 0.5 15 3.2
Disabled FCA in Start 1.9 57 0.3 1.6 46 0.2
CTS - Coolant Temperature Sensor
TPS - Throttle Position Sensor
BMAP - Barometric and Absolute Manifold Pressure Sensor
FCA - Feedback Carburetor Actuator
LOS - Limited Operational Strategy Mode
B. Description of Malfunction Conditions
The unmodified configuration and the malfunction configurations
selected to undergo more extensive screening evaluations are briefly des-
cribed as follows:
Unmodified (Unmod.) - Car in standard configuration tuned-up to manu-
facturer's specifications.
Disabled Oxygen Sensor (w/o O2). - The method used was to disconnect
the electrical lead to the sensor. With the oxygen sensor disconnected,
the fuel control system goes into a preset mode of operation.
Disabled Cold Temperature Sensor (w/o CTS) - Disconnection of the
electrical wiring to the CTS. Fuel scheduling continues as though the
engine coolant temperature remained below a preset level.
Disabled EGR Sensor (w/o EGR) - Disconnection of the electrical wiring
to the EGR position sensor. With this malfunction,the EGR system does not
function.
Engine Misfire - An Electronic Ignition Misfire unit was assembled in
accordance with schematics obtained from the EPA Project Officer. The
system was designed and used by Exxon Research and Engineering Company in a
32
-------
previous EPA contract. With only a few difficulties, the initial unit as-
sembled by SwRI functioned well, reflecting good circuit design by Exxon.
Using a standard oscilloscope and the scope on a Sun 1120 Electronic
Ignition Tester, it was determined that this unit functions as follows:
Misfire Setting,
percent Misfire Unit Operation
00.00 to 10.00 Misfires the tenth ignition signals
to the extent necessary
10.00 Misfires every tenth ignition signal
10.01 to 19.99 Misfires every tenth ignition signal
plus fifth ignition signals to the
extent necessary
19.99 Misfires every tenth and essentially
every fifth ignition signals (19.99
is the maximum setting)
Accuracy of this unit was determined by actual counts in slow-speed operation
on a bench set-up and in higher speed operation on a vehicle using sequence
comparison. The system was determined to be accurate to better than two
decimal places (e.g., a setting of 10.01 percent produced 10.01 percent mis-
fire) . A second unit was loaned to another organization through the EPA.
That organization, using a high-speed oscillograph, also reported that this
misfire system was inherently accurate.
In the related malfunction projects, a misfire setting of twelve percent
was used. ' This amount of misfire was determined to be the limit at which
driveability remained reasonably acceptable to some people. It was decided
to also use a twelve percent ignition misfire setting in this project. This
setting is considered to be representative of the extreme, rather than the
most frequent misfire malfunction that might be encountered among the auto-
mobile population.
Disabled Air Pump - Disconnection of the air supply hose and plugging
of the air system to the catalytic converter. This condition provides the
same effect as obtained with air to Bypass.
Disabled Fuel Control Actuator (w/o FCA) - Disconnection of the electri-
cal wiring to the FCA with the FCA in a cold-start setting.
C. Malfunction Screening Evaluations
A series of emissions evaluations was conducted to assist in the final
selection of four malfunction configurations for use in the vehicle testing
phase of this project. The results of these screening evaluations are sum-
marized in Table 11. A more detailed summary, the repeat test data, the com-
puter printouts for regulated emissions and the individual sample FTP results
33
-------
TABLE 11. MALFUNCTION SCREENING FTP RESULTS
1979 Mercury Marquis with 351 "W" Engine
Emissions in mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer , mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons . , VlOO km
Unmod.
51Aa
744.3
7.2
24.5
33.73
4.67
468
540
367.2
15.74
w/o 02
Sensor
51Ba
743.7
8.5
24.8
31.51
4.78
—
—
345.4
14.79
w/o
CTS
51C-2
741.7
10.6
26.7
38.20
0.31
443
553
329.2
17.83
w/o EGR
Sensor
51F-1
753.1
4.4
25.6
36.22
4.34
502
639
394.0
16.90
12%
Misfire
51M-1
738.9
7.5
24.4
37.24
4.08
560
769
404.6
17.38
DISABLED AIR PUMP
W/O O2
51BH-1
749.0
4.6
23.9
33.85
0.77
481
584
355.6
15.79
w/o CTS
51CH-2
739.9
6.5
23.9
35.88
0.74
445
588
321.5
16.74
w/o FCA
51KH3
742.0
7.0
25.9
38.05
—
—
541
298.6
17.75
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, tTHC),g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
0.12
0.74
0.79
11.93
0.21
0.21
0.09
0.49
2.93
7.55
1.02
1.08
1.53
53.21
1.89
12.98
0.53
0.46
0.14
0.98
2.90
9.67
7.66
7.05
0.50
0.62
0.75
17.55
3.23
2.89
0.52
8.14
2.05
5.34
0.38
0.37
1.54
41.87
1.90
16.97
0.43
0.40
2.29
70.06
0.41
10.25
0.07
0.06
0.4
71.8
0.02
0.01
5.04
0.08
9.4
55.8
0.23
0.02
5.36
—
10.3
372.8
0.00
0.03
132.65
49.29
9.1
81.6
0.56
0.00
6.89
0.00
0.0
82.2
0.23
0.00
0.61
0.04
7.1
168.4
0.77
0.00
16.37
6.69
7.8
349.9
0.00
0.03
140.91
26.07
1.7
999.6
0.51
0.01
203.41
35.45
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.03
0.00
23.89
0.00
0.00
16.32
0.45
0.00
73.17
0.00
0.00
103.63
0.11
0.00
0.14
0.00
43.93
0.35
0.00
60.43
1.06
0.00
17.09
Average values for two tests
-------
are given in Appendix B. The individual sample 4-bag results, given
in Appendix B,are an approximation of the net emissions (exhaust minus
background emissions).
The engine configurations, as used in these evaluations, are identified
as follows:
Unmodified - Car in the standard configuration with the engine
tuned-up to manufacturer's specifications.
Without 02 Sensor - Electrical wiring to the oxygen sensor disconnected.
Without CTS - Electrical wiring to the cold temperature sensor dis-
connected.
Without EGR Sensor - Electrical wiring to the EGR sensor disconnected.
12% Misfire - Ignition misfiring at 12 percent.
Without FCA - Fuel control actuator disabled in the cold-start position.
Disabled Air Pump - No additional air provided to the catalytic converter.
(This condition is equivalent to Air to Bypass) .
Most of the repeat runs are reported in Appendix B-2. Included in that
appendix table is Test 51CH-1 which involved an unscheduled malfunction that
could not be defined. Questionable results also occurred in a couple of other
tests, which were aborted. Test 51CH-1 was retained and processed due to the
extremity of its regulated emission results. The results generally obtained
in these evaluations, however, were in line with expected values. In sub-
sequent checks and repeat runs, no additional difficulties were experienced
Referring to the data in Appendix B-2 (and discounting Test 51CH-1), relatively
good repeatability was obtained for essentially all emissions. A few, however,
such as carbon monoxide, ammonia and sulfides did not always appear to repeat
well. In most of these cases, however, the values being compared are relatively
small. The extremely rich condition, that occurred during Test 51CH-1, pri-
marily affected fuel consumption, the regulated emissions, particulates and
measured individual hydrocarbons.
The conditions reported in Table 11, which produced relatively large
increases in emissions, are resummarized in Table 12. The following discus-
sion is based on Table 12 for compound groups and on Table 11 for single emission
components and fuel consumption.
With the oxygen sensor disconnected, the major effect was an over three-
fold increase in oxides of nitrogen. With the oxygen sensor and the air pump
disabled, all three regulated emissions increased by two and one-half to ten
times the unmodified value. Of possible interest is that fuel consumption
did not appear to increase with the oxygen sensor disconnected.
Disconnecting the Cold Temperature Sensor (CTS), both with and without
disabling the air pump, produced large increases in hydrocarbons, carbon
35
-------
TABLE 12. CONFIGURATIONS WHICH PRODUCED RELATIVELY
LARGE INCREASES IN EMISSIONS
Configuration
Oxygen Sensor Disconnected
Cold Temperature Sensor
Disconnected (w & w/o Air)
EGR Sensor Disconnected
12 Percent Misfire
Disabled 02 Sensor & Air System
Fuel Control Actuator Disabled
in the Cold-Start Position
Emission
Increased
NOX
Aldehydes
HC
CO
NO
Aldehydes
IHC
Ammonia
CN~
N2O
NOX
Sulfate
Aldehydes
N2O
Sulfate
CO
NOX
Aldehydes
Ammonia
CN~
N2O
HC
CO
IHC
Ammonia
CN~
H2S
g/km
2.9
0.009
1.5
>40.
1.9
> 0.008
0.4
> 0.13
> 0.03
> 0.06
2.9
0.008
0.009
0.10
0.003
8.1
2.1
0.007
0.02
0.01
0.04
2.2
70.0
1.0
0.20
0.04
0.001
Half ./Unmod
4
25
10
>50
2
20
5
25
N.A.
3
4
35
25
4
15
10
3
20
3
N.A.
2
20
90
15
40
N.A.
N.A.
NOTE: N.A. designates those values for which it
was not applicable to calculate a ratio.
36
-------
monoxide and fuel consumption, along with some of the higher values for
oxides of nitrogen, aldehydes, ammonia, cyanides and nitrous oxide.
Disabling the Fuel Control Actuator (FCA) in the start position pro-
duced large increases in a number of emissions. It should be noted, however,
that this malfunction probably has a relatively low change for occurrence.
It was included in these screening evaluations since it represents an ex-
treme condition. In general, it appears that overall, the unregulated
emissions were not significantly greater in this configuration
With the EGR sensor disconnected, the oxides of nitrogen, sulfate and
nitrous oxide increase by relatively large amounts.
With 12% ignition misfire, only particulates and sulfate increased by
a relatively large amount. The catalyst maximum temperature also increased
by a relatively large amount.
The individual malfunctions that were initially considered, can be
divided into several separate categories. These categories are as follows:
Malfunction Effect
w/o 02 sensor & LOS mode Operation outside of 3-way operating window
w/o CTS & w/o FCA Very rich operation
w/o EGR (2 ways) Major loss of NO control
X
12% Misfire Fuel burned in catalyst after light-
off rather than in the engine
w/o Air Some loss of HC and CO control
The probability of the FCA failing in the start position appeared to
be very low. The LOS Mode appeared to offer nothing that could not be ob-
tained more assuredly by other means. The two methods of disabling the EGR
system (sensor or vacuum source) appeared to produce essentially the same
effect.
The four malfunction configurations selected for use in the vehicle
testing phase of this project were as follows:
• Disconnected Oxygen Sensor
• 12% Misfire and Air to Bypass
• Disconnected EGR Sensor and Air to Bypass
• Disconnected Cold Temperature Sensor
These selected malfunction configurations were discussed with the Ford
emissions representative and approved by the EPA Project Officer.
37
-------
V. VEHICLE TESTING
Regulated and unregulated emissions from the 1979 Mercury Marquis were
measured with the car operating under the four selected malfunction conditions.
This car utilized a three-way catalyst, followed by an oxidation catalyst, with
additional air added prior to the oxidation catalyst. This section presents
the results of those evaluations.
A. Malfunctions Evaluated
The car, malfunction conditions, and procedures are described in previous
sections II through IV. The malfunction conditions evaluated were as follows:
Test
Series Description
511 Disconnected Oxygen Sensor
512 12% Misfire and Air to Bypass
513 Disconnected EGR Sensor and Air to Bypass
514 Disconnected Cold Temperature Sensor
B. Regulated and Unregulated Emissions Test Results
Summaries of the test results are included in Appendix C. Individual sample
data for the FTP evaluations are included in Appendix D and the computer printouts
for the regulated emissions are included in Appendix E. The analyses and dis-
cussion of these test results are included in Section VI of this report.
In all data tables, a double dash (—) has been used when no test data were
available. This occurs for those unregulated emissions which were only tested
on a spot-check basis and when valid test data could not be obtained due to
instrument malfunction or loss of the sample.
All FTP unregulated emissions data, with the exception of DMNA, are based
on appropriately weighted four-cycle FTP results. The DMNA evaluations con-
sisted of a single trap taken continuously over the first three cycles of the
four-cycle FTP. If most of the DMNA were formed during the cold-start 505,
then the reported DMNA data would be on the high side (up to a maximum of about
1.5 times the value that would be obtained in a standard weighted three-sample
FTP). If the DMNA were produced at a constant rate in all three cycles, then
such weighted composite results would be essentially identical to these con-
tinuous sample three-cycle results.
38
-------
C. short-Test Procedure Results
The regulated emissions were measured over two short driving cycles and
two steady-state test procedures. Initially, in the related project^), a
Barnes "garage type" NDIR analyzer, obtained on loan from the EPA, was used
to measure HC and CO in the undiluted exhaust. This analyzer developed
serious operational difficulties and was replaced with laboratory grade NDIR
instruments. The analyzers used are in a Beckman cart which was initially
designed for and used in nine-mode heavy-duty engine evaluations. As specified,
nitric oxide (NO) was determined with the chemiluminescence instrument in the
NO mode (i.e., NO to NO converter was bypassed).
The results of the short test evaluations are reported in Appendix F.
Due to the apparent inconsistencies with some of the results, the steady-
state tests for all configurations were repeated. These repeat runs, given
in Appendix F-2, indicate that the initial results were not actually incon-
sistent.
The results of the initial short test evaluations are summarized in Table
13. These results indicate that there were no consistent quantitative re-
lationships between the various cyclic and steady-state test results. For
example, in Tests 512, 513 and 514, hydrocarbons varied from 1.59 to 1.83 in
the FTP compared with 0.40 to 4.14 in the NYCC and 0.04 to 1.55 in the FSC.
Oxides of nitrogen emissions for the FTP were four times as high in Test 511
than in Test 512, but were lower for the NYCC in Test 511 than in Test 512.
In reviewing the continuous dilute emission traces for the FTP, SET and
HFET, it was determined that extremely high emission rates frequently oc-
curred during rapid throttle change, while low emission rates occurred
during essentially all other operation. This factor may have been associated
with some of the apparent anomalies. In general, however, the reasons for
the apparent anomalies were not readily apparent.
39
-------
TABLE 13. SHORT-TEST PROCEDURES RESULTS
Steady State Raw Emissions Tests
Transient Cycle
UNMODIFIED
Hydrocarbons , g/km
Carbon Monoxide , g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
511-2 Disabled C>2 Sensor
Hydrocarbons , g/km
Carbon Monoxide , g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
512-2 12 Pet. Misfire w/o Air
Hydrocarbons , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
513-2 Disabled EGR & Air
Hydrocarbons , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
FTP
0.12
1.35
0.85
0.09
0.82
2.42
1.82
8.86
0.61
1.59
38.84
0.46
NYCC
0.15
1.55
1.00
0.07
0.13
1.79
0.55
5.16
1.98
0.40
8.62
1.66
Tests
FSC
0.05
1.02
0.48
0.03
0.04
2.51
0.04
0.15
1.18
0.12
1.90
1.92
TSIT
ppmH*
%
ppmNO
ppmH*
%
ppmNO
ppmH*
%
ppm
ppmH*
%
ppm
2500
58
<0.01
240
67
<0.01
388
69
<0.01
150
178
2.5
120
IDLE
59
<0.01
35
261
0.3
12
115
0.09
1
406
3.9
7
FTM
52 MPH 25 MPH IDLE
67
<0.01
925
71
<0.01
2288
81
<0.01
850
157
1.9
470
67
<0.01
263
49
<0.01
830
75
<0.01
100
237
3.6
86
67
<0.01
35
261
0.3
17
74
0.03
2
492
4.3
6
514-2 Disconnected CTS
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
1.83
54.67
0.34
4.14
124.11
0.43
1.55
44.27
0.27
ppmH*
%
ppm
162
2
52
.7
241
2
3
.9
130
1
250
.9
183
4.0
22
256
3.2
3
* ppmH - Hydrocarbons as ppm Hexane measured using an Infrared Emission Analyzer
FTP - Light Duty Federal Test Procedure
NYCC - New York City Cycle
FSC - Federal Short Cycle
TSIT - Two Speed Idle Test
FTM - Federal Three Mode
-------
VI. ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS
This section reports the analyses performed on the emissions data
generated in this project. These analyses involved averaging and reformatting
to enable making various comparisons of the data. Due to the very limited
number of data points for each emission at each specific condition, advanced
statistical analyses were judged to be inapplicable. Another limitation to
further analyses was that criteria were not available to enable establishing
acceptable or unacceptable concentrations of each emission in the exhaust.
This precluded establishing the significance of the changes in emission levels
that occurred. For example, a hundredfold increase in one emission does not
necessarily represent a greater hazard than a tenfold, or possibly even lesser,
increase in another emission.
Therefore, this section presents the data in formats that enable ready
review and comparison. It is generally left up to the individual readers to
apply their own interpretation as to the significance of the changes in the
emission levels under the various operating conditions.
A. Average Values for the Unmodified Configuration
The initial analyses of the data involved averaging of the four evalua-
tions conducted with each car in the unmodified configuration. These averages,
along with the maximum and minimum values are presented in Appendix G,and are
summarized in Table 14.
For the FTP, the HC and CO emissions were below all currently scheduled
light-duty emission standards through 1985. The NOX was below the 1980 Federal
and the 1979 California emission standards. All unregulated emissions measured
were relatively low in the FTP evaluations.
For the SET and HFET, relative to the FTP, emissions were generally either
negligible or lower. The exceptions were NOX, total particulates and sulfate.
The NOx remained essentially constant, while particulates and sulfate were an
order of magnitude greater for the HFET than for the FTP.
Fuel Consumption results, for the unmodified configuration, are sum-
marized as follows:
Fuel Consumption Range
FTP SET HFET
Litre/100 km 15.4-16.1 11.4-12.0 10.2-10.6
Miles per gallon 14.6-15.3 19.6-20.6 22.2-23.1
(Max-Min)/Avg 4% 6% 6%
41
-------
TABLE 14. AVERAGE VALUES FOR UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
Segulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
FTPa
0.13
1.63
0.83
4.1
0.9
2.6
69.
0.21
0.00
5.1
0.31
0.00
0.00
24.
Emissions in mg/km (Except as Noted)
SET
0.03
0.35
0.77
18.8
12.4
2.0
24.
0.11
0.01
HFET
0.01
0.05
0.83
36.4
27.1
0.6
9.
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
11.
0.00
0.00
6.
a The 1979 Federal Emission Standards were 0.93, 9.32, 1.24 for HC,
CO, NOX. The 1979 California Standards were 0.25, 5.59, 0.93.
42
-------
This amount of variation is considered as being good repeatability for the
type of evaluations conducted. Also, the values for the FTP are in agree-
ment with the 15 mpg given in the 1979 EPA-DOE Gas Mileage Guide.
B. Average Values for the Malfunction Configurations
The average values for the malfunction configurations, along with the
average values for the unmodified configuration, are given in Appendix H.
Various results have been separated out and are discussed in the following
sections.
C. Analyses of Emissions and Fuel Consumption
The analyses of the regulated emissions and fuel consumption results
were straightforward and test-to-test repeatability was generally good.
The results of these analyses are discussed separately for the regulated
and the unregulated emissions.
Regulated Emissions - A summary of the regulated emissions and fuel con-
sumption data is presented in Table 15. The following comparisons are based
on the 1979 Federal light-duty emission standards. Hydrocarbon emissions
exceeded 0.9 grams per kilometer for three out of the four malfunctions
evaluated. Carbon monoxide emissions exceeded 9 g/km in two out of the four
malfunctions. Oxides of nitrogen emissions exceeded 1.24 gAm only with the
oxygen sensor disconnected. These comparisons of the regulated emissions
values to the 1979 Federal Standards (0.93, 9.3, 1.24 g/km for HC, CO, NOX)
are summarized as follows:
Ratio of Emission Rate to the 1979 Federal Standard3
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Values have been rounded off to zero
or the nearest whole number.
Unregulated Emissions - A summary of the unregulated emissions results
is given in Table 16. The unregulated emissions having the most significant
changes in emissions rates were total particulates, sulfate, ammonia, cyanide-
cyanogen, and hydrogen sulfide. Total particulates and sulfate decreased by
relatively large amounts with all malfunction configurations in the SET and
HFET evaluations. In the FTP evaluations, ammonia and cyanide-cyanogen
increased by relatively large amounts with the CTS disconnected and with the
EGR disabled plus air to bypass. Hydrogen sulfide emissions were highest
with the CTS disconnected.
Unmod .
0
0
n 1
Dis.O2
Sensor
0
0
2
12% Mis.
w/o Air
2
1
0
Dis . EGR
w/o Air
2
4
0
Disc.
CTS
2
6
0
43
-------
TABLE 15. SUMMARY OF AVERAGE REGULATED EMISSIONS
AND FUEL CONSUMPTION DATA
FTP Results
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Fuel Cons., A/100 km
Unmod.
0.13
1.63
0.83
15.8
Disabled
02 Sensor
0.11
0.96
2.51
15.5
Misfire
+ Air
to Bypass
1.73
8.91
0.60
16.4
Disabled Discon-
EGR + Air nected
to Bypass CTS
1.49
35.45
0.55
17.1
1.80
52.41
0.36
18.5
SET Results
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.03 0.04 0.35
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 0.35 0.23 2.93
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 0.77 2.70 0.44
Fuel Cons., £/100 km 11.8 11.6 11.8
0.45
11.45
0.75
12.5
1.05
36.06
0.26
13.0
HFET Results
Hydrocarbons, g/km 0.01 0.01 0.10
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 0.05 0.05 1.00
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 0.83 1.28 0.42
Fuel Cons., VlOO km 10.4 9.8 10.7
0.08
0.76
0.97
11.3
0.85
32.41
0.21
12.0
Note: Values given are the average of up to four tests for the
unmodified and two tests for the malfunction conditions.
44
-------
TABLE 16. SUMMARY OF THE AVERAGE
UNREGULATED EMISSIONS DATA
Emissions in mg/km
FTP Results
Total Particulate
Sulfate
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbony1
Nitrous Oxide
SET Results
Total Particulate
Sulfate
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
HFET Results
Total Particulate
Sulfate
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
*Validity of the average value is questionable.
Unmod .
2 .
0.9
3.
0.2
0.0
5.
0.3
0.0
0.00
24.
18.
12.
2.
0.1
<0.1
0.0
0.00
11.
48.
27.
1.
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
0.00
6.
Disabled
02 Sensor
6.
1.3
<1.
0.6
0.0
3.
0.1*
0.0
0.00
11.
4.
2.1
<1.
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.00
8.
10.
5.
<1.
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.00
4.
12%
Misfire + Air
to Bypass
10.
0.1
2.
0.2
<0.1
31.
1.6
0.6
0.00
12.
4.
<0.1
<1.
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.00
5.
1.
<0.1
1.
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.00
2.
Disabled
EGR -1- Air
to Bypass
6.
0.2
3.
0.1
<0.1
172.
70.
0.4
0.00
88.
6.
0.1
<1.
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
0.00
37.
2.
0.1
1.
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.00
8.
Discon-
nected
CTS
11.
0.2
3.*
0.3*
<0.1
253.
112.
1.0
0.00
43.
5.
0.1
<1.
0.2
<0.1
2.0
0.00
17.
3.
<0.1
1.
0.2
<0.1
3.2
0.00
9.
45
-------
D. General Effects of Malfunctions on Emissions
In this section an attempt has been made to give the reader a general
idea of the effects of car and malfunction configuration on emissions. Due
to the lack of established levels of significance for the unregulated emis-
sions, it can not be established at this time whether or not any of the
changes in emission levels are a definite cause for concern.
An evaluation that can provide some insight is whether the respective
malfunctions caused increases in emissions relative to the unmodified con-
figuration. The results of such an evaluation for the FTP results are sum-
marized in Table 17.
E. Other Elements and DMNA
An illustrative summary of the results for the elemental analyses, in
the FTP evaluations, is given in Table 18. With the exception of the three
relatively high chlorine values (0.66, 0.33, 2.26), all values are within the .
range encountered in the previous project involving three-way catalyst cars.
The causes for these relatively high chlorine values are not known.
DMNA analyses were conducted only for the unmodified and the disabled
oxygen sensor configurations. No DMNA was detected, by the measurement method
used, in either of these two evaluations.
F. Maximum Emission Values
The highest of the averaged emission values were determined and these data
are presented in Table 19. These data are listed separately for the unmodified
and for the malfunction configurations. The last two pages of Table 19 identify
the car test which produced the respective maximum value.
Table 19 is intended to provide some insight into which compounds may be
of potential concern. After "threshold levels for concern" are established
for the unregulated emissions, this table will enable ready screening to deter-
mine which of the unregulated emissions may be a potential cause for concern;
and perhaps aid in setting priorities for further investigations into possible
hazardous toxicity effects. Further review of the results given in Appendix H
would then be required to establish whether or not concern is actually justified.
Another analysis considered was the percentage change in emission rates
for each malfunction condition relative to the unmodified configuration. Two
considerations tend to preclude the usefulness of such an analysis. One con-
sideration was that the concentrations for some of the compounds were near the
"minimum detection value." Percentage change for these compounds would be
essentially meaningless. A second consideration was the previously mentioned
lack of "threshold levels for concern."
G. Relative Importance of the Maximum Emission Rates
There are proposed or established automotive source emission standards
46
-------
TABLE 17. RELATIONSHIP OF MALFUNCTION TO UNMODIFIED
EMISSIONS RESULTS FOR THE FTP
Relationship of Malfunction to Unmodified
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
I = Increase, D = Decrease, S = Same
Unmod. ,
mg/km
0.13
1.63
0.83
2.0
0.9
2.6
69.
0.2
0.00
5.1
0.3
0.00
0.00
24.
Dis. O2
Sensor
D
D
I
I
I
D
S
I
S
D
D
S
S
D
12% Mis.
w/o Air
I
I
D
I
D
D
I
D
I
I
I
I
S
D
Dis. EGR
w/o Air
I
I
D
I
D
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
S
I
Disabled
CTS
I
I
D
I
D
S
I
I
I
I
I
I
S
I
47
-------
TABLE 18. SUMMARY OF THE ELEMENTAL ANALYSES
RESULTS FOR THE FTP
Exhaust Emission, mg/km
Pb
Al
0.04
S
0.49
Cl
0.66
Fe
0.96
Ba
Ca
0.03
Tasks 1 & 3
51U 0.07 0.19 0.32 0.12
511 0.12 0.03 0.03 0.10
512 0.24 0.04 2.26 0.50
513 0.10 0.53 0.53 0.03
514 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.25 0.03
Pb - Lead Fe - Iron
Al - Aluminum Ba - Barium
S - Sulfur Ca - Calcium
Cl - Chlorine
Test General Description
51U Unmodified
511 Disabled O« Sensor
512 12% Misfire + Air to Bypass
513 Disabled EGR + Air to Bypass
514 Disconnected CTS
a Maximum values are reported for the Task 1 and
3 malfunction screening evaluations.
k Only values greater than 0.02 are included in this table.
48
-------
TABLE 19. HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehyde & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulf ides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
FTP
Unmod.
0.13
1.63
0.83
2.01
0.85
2.6
69.1
0.21
0.00
5.05
0.31
0.00
0.00
24.12
2.41
0.11
0.01
0.08
0.00
0.00
45.56
4.69
4.63
1.58
0.63
1.90
4.65
5.45
0.13
0.04
0.02
0.01
Malf .
1.80
52.41
2.51
11.34
1.30
2.9
721.9
0.61
0.05
252.97
112.29
0.96
0.00
87.88
1.27
1.17
1.10
1.10
0.13
0.00
139.75
185.57
18.95
3.27
2.56
76.02
125.43
191.12
0.17
0.14
0.20
0.11
SET
Unmod.
0.03
0.35
0.77
18.84
12.36
2.0
24.4
0.11
0.01
__
—
0.00
0.00
10.65
1.76
0.19
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
21.00
0.58
1.76
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.83
0.19
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
Malf.
1.05
36.06
2.70
5.75
2.11
0.7
463.2
0.28
0.02
__
—
2.00
0.00
37.34
0.63
0.36
0.23
0.23
0.07
0.00
84.19
111.62
12.65
0.00
1.24
52.18
79.33
122.02
0.15
0.14
0.01
0.01
HFET
Unmod.
0.01
0.05
0.83
48.43
27.14
0.6
9.0
0.04
0.01
_.
—
0.00
0.00
5.51
1.14
0.04
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
8.27
0.00
0.53
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
Malf.
0.85
32.41
1.28
9.93
5.19
1.3
383.2
0.81
0.02
__
—
3.18
0.00
8.88
0.38
0.13
0.16
0.95
0.12
0.00
72.13
93.53
11.77
0.00
1.05
47.34
68.86
88.55
0.26
0.26
0.05
0.24
49
-------
TABLE 19 (Cont'd)
HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
0.07
0.01
0.19
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Cesium
Calcium
Tin
Antimony
Palladium
Note: Values for all spaces left blank for
"Other Elements" are 0.00.
FTP
Unmod .
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Malf.
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
SET
Unmod.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Malf.
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
Unmod.
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Malf.
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.12
0.01
0.01
0.24
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.53
2.26
0.02
0.02
0.53
0.03
0.03
0.01
4.83
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.09
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.94
0.22
0.01
0.25
0.01
0.01
7.95 2.05
1.78 0.01 1.65
0.20
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01
50
-------
TABLE 19 (Cont'd). HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
Car Test Number for Malfunction
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons^
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
FTP
514
514
511
514
511
513
514
511
513
514
514
514
513
513
514
514
513
511
514
514
514
514
514
514
512
514
511
511
511
511
SET
514
514
511
513
511
513
514
511
513
HFET
514
514
511
511
511
512
514
511
512, 514
514
513
513
514
514
512
511
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
511
511
514
514
514
514
513
512
513
514
511
514
514
514
514
514
514
514
511
511
511
511
51
-------
TABLE 19 (Cont'd). HIGHEST OF THE AVERAGED EMISSION RATES
a
Car Test Number for Malfunction
FTP SET HFET
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine 512, 513, 514 513 514
Monoethylamine 513 512 512
Trimethylamine 513
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead 512 512 512
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine 512
Phosphorus 512,514 514 513
Silicon 513 513,514
Cadmium
Aluminum 514 511, 513, 514 511, 513
Sulfur 513 513 513
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine 512 512 512
Platinum
Zinc 513
Copper 512
Nickel
Iron 513 512 513
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium 514 511, 512, 514 511, 512,
513, 514
Cesium
Calcium 513 511, 513, 514 513
Tin
Antimony
Palladium
Note: Values for all spaces left blank for "Other Elements" are 0.0.
511 - Disconnected Oxygen Sensor
512 - 12% Misfire and Air to Bypass
513 - Disconnected EGR Sensor and Air to Bypass
514 - Disconnected Cold Temperature Sensor
52
-------
for four of the compounds evaluated in this project. Such standards can be
utilized in a comparative analyses of the emission results for those compounds.
For most of the compounds evaluated, however, standards have not been estab-
lished and attempted analyses of relative importance requires the application
of some other available criteria.
The data from Table 19 were converted into units of mg/m in the undiluted
exhaust and these converted data are presented in Table 20. Table 20 also
lists the Threshold Limit Values (TLV) for those substances included in the
"Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances."^ Some additional FTP
relative values for the regulated emissions are given as follows for reference
purposes:
Equivalent Level in
Mass Emission Rate FTP Raw Exhaust a
g/km g/mi mg/m3
HC 0.9 1.5 550
HC 0.25 0.41 150
CO 9.3 15 5500
CO 4.4 7 2500
CO 2.1 3.4 1200
NOX 1.2 2.0 700
NOX 0.6 1.0 350
NOX 0.25 0.41 150
a
Approximate values based on the relationship
for the one car evaluated in this project.
The conversion from an emission rate in g/km to mg/m3 was determined by the
total volume of the undiluted exhaust and the total distance driven for each
test. The volume of undiluted exhaust differs for each malfunction condition,
generally as a function of the fuel consumption rate. For generating Table 20,
and the additional FTP relative values, a relationship was used which tends to
correct all data to an equivalent undiluted exhaust flow rate equal to the
lowest for any of the configurations evaluated. This was done in order to
equalize the data to a common basis and eliminate the relative reduction ob-
tained by configurations having high exhaust flow rates.
These data are summarized further and compared to the emissions standards
and the TLV in Table 21. The values summarized in Table 21 are intended to
provide some possible idea of the relative importance, based on toxicity, for
some of the compounds evaluated. It should be emphasized, however, that defi-
nite conclusions are currently inappropriate for any compounds; except possibly
those for which automotive source emission standards have been established. It
should be recognized that the hazard level of a compound may change based on
new findings in health effect research. This is especially a factor when a
compound is changed from a toxic concern to a carcinogenic concern; such as is
apparently occurring with benzene and formaldehyde. Also, some compounds which
53
-------
TABLE 20. MAXIMUM EMISSION LEVELS IN THE UNDILUTED EXHAUST
Approximate Emission Level in Undiluted Exhaust, mg/m"
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
FTP
Unmod.
80
1,000
500
1.2
0.5
1.6
41.
0.1
0.0
3.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
14.5
1.5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
0.0
27.
3.
3.
1.
<1.
1.
3.
3.
0.08
0.02
0.01
0.01
Malf .
1,100
31,400
1,500
6.8
0.8
1.7
433.
0.4
<0.1
151.8
67.4
0.6
0.0
52.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
<0.1
0.0
84.
111.
11.
2.
2.
46.
75.
115.
0.10
0.08
0.12
0.07
SET
Unmod.
20
300
600
14.1
9.3
1.5
18.
0.1
<0.1
—
0.0
0.0
8.0
1.3
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
0.0
16.
<1.
1.
0.
<1.
0.
<1.
<1.
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Malf.
800
27,000
2,000
4.3
1.6
0.5
347.
0.2
<0.1
__
_—
1.5
0.0
28.0
0.5
0.3
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.0
63.
84.
9.
0.
1.
39.
60.
92.
0.11
0.11
0.01
0.01
HFET
Unmod.
10
50
700
43.6
24.4
0.5
8.
<0.1
<0.1
__
—
0.0
0.0
5.0
1.0
<0.1
0.0
<0.1
0.0
0.0
7.
0.
<1.
0.
<1.
0.
<1.
<1.
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
Malf.
800
29,000
1,200
8.9
4.7
1.2
345.
0.7
<0.1
_.
—
2.9
0.0
8.0
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.0
65.
84.
11.
0.
1.
43.
62.
80.
0.23
0.23
0.05
0.22
TLV/0'
mg/m-*
55
9
— ._
— —
__
—
—
— —
35
5C
20d
0.007
— —
4
360
2400
__
590
— —
._
— :
—
2400
1800
—
33
760
„
—
—
—
54
-------
TABLE 20 (Cont'd.) MAXIMUM EMISSION LEVELS IN THE UNDILUTED EXHAUST,
Approximate Emission Level in Undiluted Exhaust,mg/fa'
FTP
SET
HFET
TLV,
(8)
Unmod. Half.
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine 0 . 00 0.01
Monoethylamine 0.00 0.02
Trimethylamine 0.00 0.01
Diethylandne 0.00 0.00
Triethylamine 0.00 0.00
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead 0.04 0.14
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus 0 . 01
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum 0.01 0.02
Sulfur 0.11 0.32
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine 0.19 1.36
Platinum
Zinc 0.01
Copper 0.01
Nickel
Iron 0.07 0.32
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium 0.01 0.02
Cesium
Calcium 0.01 0.02
Tin
Antimony
Palladium
a Maximum of the average values.
Derived on a wet basis using the following
mg/n\3 Conversion Factor x mg/km. C.F.
C Ceiling value.
0.002 for soluble salts.
6 0.5 for soluble compounds
Unmod. Malf. Unmod. Malf. mg/nT
0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02
0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100
1
0.07 0.23 0.2
5C
0.5
0.02 0.7
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.2
0.01 0.01
3.62 0.71 7.16 1.85
0.2
0.01 1.34 0.01 1.49 3 ,
d
1
0.03 0.17 0.18
o.oi o.oi o.oi o.oi e
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 — f
0.5
approximate calculation :
= Distance/Total Volume x Dilution Fact
FTP =0.60 SET =0.75 HFET = 0.
55
-------
TABLE 21. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF MAXIMUM EMISSION RATES
Maximum
Emission
Rate (MER)
in mg/km
Emission
Standard
for 1983
in mg/km
Equivalent
MER in
Undiluted
Exhaust in
mg/m3 (MEG)
Threshold
Limit Value
(TLV) in mg/m3
OSHA(B) Rc
Ratio of
MEQ to TLV
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Formaldehyde
Benzene
1,800,
52,400!
2,500^
27
3
1
253
112
3
0
88
2
125
255
2,113
622
124
1,100
31,400
1,500
7
24
2
1
152
67
3
0
53
2
75
55
9
1
1
10
35
0.007
4
33
5
10
571
167
24
4
13
<1
0
a
b
c
FTP rate recorded for the regulated emissions and total particulates
255 mgAro in California
Based on values for some similar or Related compounds as set by OSHA(8)
or Recommended by the 1968 American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (9)
Proposed for Diesel cars
Values were 44 for the HFET
56
-------
are considered by OSHA and other agencies as being non-toxic can have a
potential, indirect harmful effect (e.g., nitrous oxide is one example
of such a compound due to its potential effect on the atmospheric ozone
layer). The ambient air standards were also reviewed for possible inclusion
in Table 21. Due to the varied ways in which the standards are expressed,
however, there did not appear to be an appropriate method for including such
standards in this comparative analyses.
With reference to Table 21, the maximum FTP composite emission rates for
HC, CO,and NOX greatly exceeded the standards for 1983 (0.41, 3.4, and 1 g/mi
for HC, CO, and NOX). The maximum value for total particulates, however,
was less than one-tenth of the proposed 0.2 g/mi particulate standard for
1983 Diesel cars.
Also, in Table 21, the maximum emission concentrations (MEC) are compared
with the Threshold Limit Values (TLV), as established by OSHA for exposure in
any 8-hour work shift. For many of the compounds listed, it would appear that
the higher the MEC to TLV ratio the more likely the maximum emission rate would
be of concern from a toxicity viewpoint.
The maximum undiluted exhaust emission concentrations for carbon monoxide
and oxides of nitrogen exceeded the TLV by over 100. Other compounds in the
undiluted exhaust, which exceeded an established TLV, were ammonia and benzene;
by factors of 4 and 2 respectively. As a matter of possible interest, the value
for carbon dioxide was over 20 times the established TLV.
For the remaining compounds and compound groups, it was necessary to esti-
mate an equivalent TLV based on best available data. '8'9) Based on these
estimated values, the maximum levels for total particulates and sulfate were
above the estimated values for an equivalent TLV by factors of 7 and 24, re-
spectively. Total particulates for the HFET exceeded the equivalent TLV by a
factor of 26 and this value occurred in the unmodified configuration.
In summary, these comparisons of the emissions results with the TLV's are
only intended to provide some relative means of interpreting the data obtained
in this project. These relative comparisons generally apply only to toxicity
and the hazardous characteristic on an individual component basis. Other areas,
such as carcinogenicity and cumulative, synergistic and indirect effects, must
be considered before any definite conclusions can be made.
57
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Urban, C. M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Malfunction-
ing Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles," Final Report to Environmental
Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-03-2588, January 1980.
2. Urban, C. M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Malfunction-
ing Non-Catalyst and Oxidation Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles," Final Report
to Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-03-2499, January
1980.
3. Dietzmann, H. E., et al, "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing Unregu-
lated, Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles," Report EPA 600/2-79-017,
February 1979.
4. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 85, Subpart H,
Sections applicable to 1979 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles.
5. Congested Freeway Driving Schedule (Appendix VIII in the Recommended
Practice for Measurement of Exhaust Sulfuric Acid Emission from Light-
Duty Vehicles and Trucks, November 1976.
6. Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (Federal Register, Vol. 41, No. 100,
May 21, 1976, Appendix I).
7. 55 mph Alternate Mileage Accumulation Procedure (MSAPC A/C No. 37,
December 20, 1973, Enclosure 1).
8. U.S. HEW "Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances," 1976 and
1978 Editions.
9. Proceedings of the 1968 American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists as reported in the Fifth Edition of the "Matheson Gas Data
Book."
58
-------
APPENDICES
A - GENERAL INFORMATION
B - MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS
C - SUMMARIES OF VEHICLE TESTING RESULTS
D - FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
E - COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE REGULATED
EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS
F - SHORT-TEST PROCEDURES RESULTS
G - AVERAGE VALUES FOR UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
H - AVERAGE VALUES FOR ALL CONFIGURATIONS
-------
APPENDIX A
GENERAL INFORMATION
A-l Modified Durability Driving Schedule
A-2 Short-Test Procedures
A-3 Analytical Procedure for DMNA
A-4 Calculations for Unregulated Emissions
-------
APPENDIX A-l. MODIFIED DURABILITY DRIVING SCHEDULE FOR
MILEAGE ACCUMULATION ON PUBLIC ROADS
The following schedule is shown on Figure A-l:
1. Leave Institute Fleet Laboratory.
2. Proceed to CULEBRA ROAD via INSTITUTE ROAD, 20 & 30 m.p.h.
3. Stop at CULEBRA.
4. Left turn onto CULEBRA and proceed to "A", 410, at 40 m.p.h.
(Distance from Fleet Laboratory to "A" is 2.3 miles).
5. Stop at "A", idle 15 sec.
6. Start lap prompter at 1.
7. Accelerate from stop, turn left on access road.
8. After left turn, accelerate to lap speed and then decelerate
at "B" to 20 m.p.h., as traffic permits.
9. Accelerate to lap speed as you turn onto 410. Continue on 410
to next exit and then decelerate at "C" to 20 m.p.h., as traffic
permits then accelerate to lap speed.
10. Continue on FRONTAGE ROAD until a full stop can be safely made
at area of point "D". Idle for 15 sees.
11. Accelerate from stop to lap speed and pull onto 410 at next ramp.
Continue on 410 to next exit ramp.
12. Take exit, then decelerate to 20 m.p.h., at "E".
13. Accelerate to lap speed.
14. Stop at "F" and idle 15 sees.
15. Accelerate to lap speed and continue to "G". Decelerate to
20 m.p.h. at "G" then accelerate to lap speed.
16. Stop at traffic light if red, "H" (this can be as long as
33 sees.). If the light is green, proceed and make an additional
stop along the North lap as traffic permits.
17. As you pass "H" stop light, push the "lap" prompter and observe
the "lap speed."
18. Left turn on MARBACH under 410. Stop at light "I". If light is
green, proceed on North lap and make additional stop as traffic
permits.
19. Left turn to 410 access at "I".
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A-l (Cont'd.). MODIFIED DURABILITY DRIVING SCHEDULE FOR
MILEAGE ACCUMULATION ON PUBLIC ROADS
20. Proceed up 410 to "J" at lap speed.
21. Decelerate at "J" to 20 m.p.h. and then accelerate to lap speed.
22. Continue to "K" at lap speed.
23. Decelerate at "K" to 20 m.p.h. and then accelerate to lap speed.
24. Take ramp to 410 and proceed up 410 to exit ramp at "L".
25. Decelerate at "L" to 20 m.p.h. and then accelerate to lap speed.
26. Proceed to "M", then stop and idle 15 sees.
27. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate at "N" to 20 m.p.h.,
and then accelerate to lap speed.
28. Take ramp to 410 and continue on 410 to CULEBRA exit ramp.
29. Take CULEBRA exit to stop at "A". Idle 15 sees.
30. Push "lap" prompter for next lap and lap speed.
31. This begins the 3rd lap.
32. Continue with South lap - North lap sequence until lap Number 9
is complete.
33. Lap Number 10 is run at a steady 55 m.p.h. on 410. Get on 410
at first entrance ramp following the stop at the end of lap
Number 9 and stay on 410.
34. Lap 10 is completed when you stop at "A" or "H" after pulling
off onto the ramp nearest the stop.
35. After stop at "A" or "H", Lap Number 10 is complete.
36. Punch lap button for Lap 11.
37. Accelerate then stop at "B".
38. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate to stop at "D".
39. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate to stop at "F".
40. Accelerate to lap speed then decelerate to stop at "H".
41. This completes one cycle of the mileage accumulation.
42. The next cycle of the schedule begins at "H".
43. Complete as many steps per shift as time will allow, then
return to the Fleet Laboratory.
A-3
-------
Events Per Mile
55 mph Top Speed
Driving Mode
Stops
Normal Accelerations from Stop
Normal Accelerations from 20 mph
Wide-Open Throttle Accelerations
and Fast Deceleration
Idle Time
SwRI Course*
1.02
1.01
1.11
0.00
13.84 Sec.
AC No. 37
1.01
0.91
1.11
0.10
13.64 Sec.
* WOT accelerations replaced by
normal accelerations.
Institute
Road
F
Stop
G
Decel
South Lap: "A" to "H" - 4.8 km (3.0 mi)
North Lap: "H" to "A" - 4.7 km (2.9 mi)
11 Laps =52.3 km (32.5 mi)
t
North
Lap
J
Decel
Marbach Rd.
• Light
Lap
}
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Speed
km/hr
64
48
64
64
56
48
56
72
56
89
89
mi/hr
40
30
40
40
35
30
35
45
35
55
55
Loop
410 N.W.
Figure A-l. Modified (automobile) durability driving schedule
for mileage accumulation on public roads
A-4
-------
APPENDIX A-2. SHORT-TEST SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURES
DILUTE EMISSIONS TESTING - CVS
1. Check Inertia and Horsepower (set same settings as for FTP)
2. Run 505 Seconds of the FTP
3. Idle 6 minutes and Neutral with Fan On
4. Run NYCC and take bag sample
5. Idle 6 minutes in Neutral with Fan On
6. Run FSC and take bag sample at flow rate of 1 cfm
RAW EMISSIONS TESTING - HC by NDIR and NO by CL for Undiluted Emissions
7. Idle 6 minutes in Neutral with Fan On
8. Run TWO SPEED IDLE TEST (TSIT) - 3 minutes total at each condition
a. 2500 rpm in Neutral - measure during minutes 2 through 3
b. Normal Idle in Neutral - measure during minutes 2 through 3
9. Continue Normal Idle for 6 minutes Total
10. Set Inertia at 1750
11. RUN FEDERAL THREE MODE (FTM)
Minute 1 - Set 18a Horsepower at 52 mph
2 - Stabilize
3 - Measure Emissions
Minute 4 - Set 9.5a Horsepower at 25 mph
5 - Stabilize
6 - Measure Emissions
Minute 7 - Idle in Neutral
8 - Stabilize
9 - Measure Emissions
Horsepower from a table based on NADA weight and 400 Ibs.
A-5
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd). SHORT-TEST SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURES
Federal Short Cycle (FSC)
Within two hours of the FTP, SET or HFET emissions evaluations,
precondition the engine by driving the first 505 seconds of the FTP
Driving Sequence. With the fan left on and the hood left open, im-
mediately follow the 505 with six (6) minutes (± 1 minute) of opera-
tion at idle with the transmission in neutral. Immediately following
the six minutes of idle, begin the Federal Short Cycle which is de-
scribed as follows:
Mode Time in mode (sees)
0-16 mph acceleration 6
16-29 mph acceleration 23
29 mph cruise 10
29-37 mph acceleration 18
37-42 mph acceleration 4.5
42-37 mph deceleration 2.5
37-20 mph deceleration 32
20- 0 mph deceleration 7.5
Idle 21.5
125.0 seconds total
The dynamometer loadings and transmission shift points follow the pro-
cedure as required for the FTP. A minimum of 2 cu. ft. of sample exhaust
is required in the sample bag.
Two-Speed Idle Test (TSIT)
This short test consists of volumetric sampling of undiluted exhaust
emissions during two steady-state operating conditions with the hood open
and the cooling fan on. The first operating mode is 2500 engine rpm with
the transmission in neutral. The second mode is normal idle with the
transmission in neutral.
Two Speed Idle Tests shall be preceded by a six minute idle period,
as described under the Federal Short Cycle. At the end of the idle period,
the vehicle will be operated for a maximum of three minutes at 2500 rpm
and then at idle speed. At each speed, equilibrium of engine speed and
the CO, HC and NO analyzer output meters shall be maintained for 30 seconds
before the readings are recorded. CO, HC and NO shall be measured and re-
ported in % CO, ppm Hexane and ppm NO, respectively.
Federal Three Mode Test (FTM)
This short test consists of three steady-state operating modes
(similar to Clayton Key Mode) from which undiluted exhaust samples are
taken with the dynamometer loads simulating the average power which
occurs at the appropriate speed on the FTP with all light-duty vehicles
being grouped into weight classes. The test will be conducted with the
vehicle's hood open and auxiliary cooling fan in use. The inertia weight
setting is 1750 pounds and the road load settings for the 25 and 52 mph
speeds are determined from a chart.
A-6
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd). SHORT-TEST SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURES
The FTM test procedure is preceded by a six-minute idle period, as
described under the Federal Short Cycle. At the end of the idle period,
the vehicle will be operated for a maximum of three minutes at the Mode
specified speed. During the first two minutes in each mode, the
specified dynamometer load horsepower shall be set and the system shall
reach stabilization. The test shall be performed in the order of high
cruise, low cruise, and idle. At each speed, equilibrium of vehicle
speed and the CO, HC and NO analyzer meters shall be maintained for
30 seconds before the readings are recorded. CO, HC and NO shall be
measured by the volumetric procedure and reported in % CO, ppm Hexane,
and ppm NO, respectively.
A-7
-------
APPENDIX A-3. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
The following description of the analytical procedure for DMNA
was excerpted from a copy of the Special Interim Technical Report for
EPA Contract No. 68-02-2767. The interim report was prepared by Dr.
E. D. Pellizzari of the Research Triangle Institute for Dr. Ron Bradow
of the Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park. The
procedure described was used by the Research Triangle Institute in
performing the DMNA analyses reported in this final report.
ANALYSIS FOR N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE IN EXHAUST GASES USING A TENAX
GC CARTRIDGE AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY/COMPUTER
EPA Contract No. 68-02-2767
TRI/1514/00-01S
N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE AND AMBIENT AIR
ANALYTICAL METHOD
Analyte: DMN
Matrix: Air
Procedure: Absorption on Tenax GC,
thermal desorption
with He purge, measure-
ment by capillary gas-
liquid chromatography/
mass spectrometry
Date Issued:
Date Revised:
Method No:
Range: 0.5 ppt - 10 ppb
Precision: +10%
Classification: E(Proposed)
1. Principle of the Method
N-nitrosodimethylamine (DMN) is concentrated from ambient air on Tenax
GC in a short glass tube . It is desorbed by heating and purging with
helium into a liquid nitrogen cooled nickel capillary trap and then in-
troduced into a high resolution gas chromatographic column where it is se-
parated from interferences. The concentration of DMN is measured from the
mass spectrometric signal at m/e 74 .
2. Range and Sensitivity
2.1 The range of the mass spectrometric signal for the conditions
listed corresponds to 0.5 ppt to 10 ppb.
A-8
-------
APPENDIX A-3 (Cont'd). ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
2.2 A concentration of 0.5 ppt of DMN can be determined in a 150-liter
air sample.
3. Interferences
Interferences may result from materials having backgrouns ions of m/e_ 74
(C2H8N3, C2H4N02, C2H6N2O, C3H3C1, C3H6S, C3H6O2, or C3H10N2) if at the same
retention time of DMN.
4. Precision and Accuracy
4.1 The precision of this method has been determined to be ilO% of
relative standard deviation when replicate sampling cartridges
were spiked with 50 ng (corresponding to 10 ppb in 150 J, of air) .
These data were obtained using 10.0 cm long glass tubes (1.5 cm
i.d.) packed with 35/60 mesh of Tenax GC (bed dimensions:
1.5 cm x 6 cm in depth).
4.2 The accuracy of the analysis is approximately -10% of the amount
reported as determined from repeated analysis of several standards.
5. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Method
5.1 The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry technique interfaced
with a Finnigan glass jet separator (Model 01512-42158 Finnigan
Corp., Sunnyvale, CA) is extremely sensitive and specific for the
analysis of DMN. The high resolution gas chromatographic separa-
tion yields a retention time that is characteristic for DMN, and
relatively specific for positive assignment of the signal as DMN.
The mass spectrometer in combination with high resolution gas
chromatography yields a very high degree of specificity. The
base peak of DMN is at m/e_ 74 which is also the parent ion. In
order to assign the signal at m/e_ 74 to DMN it is absolutely
necessary that the retention time matches with the signal.
5.2 Collected samples can be stored up to 1 month with less than 10%
lossess.
5.3 Because DMN is a suspected carcinogen in man it is extremely
important to exercise safety precautions in the preparation and
disposal of liquid and gas standards, cleaning of used glassware,
etc., and the analysis of air samples.
5.4 Since the mass spectrometer can not be conveniently mobilized,
sampling must be carried out away from the instrument.
5.5 High resolution gas chromatography/low resolution mass spectro-
metry is not a convenient technique for handling a large number
of samples (>100/wk).
A-9
-------
APPENDIX A-3 (Cont'd). ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR DMNA
5.6 Efficiency of air sampling increases as the ambient air tem-
perature decreases (i-e_., sensitivity increases) .
5.7 Ambient air sampling is limited to cases where the NO levels
are less than 3 ppm when dimethylamine is also present.
A-10
-------
APPENDIX A-4. CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
This appendices documents the calculational methods used for
the unregulated emissions. All values not defined (i.e., CVS FLOW,
VOL, etc.) are obtained from the computer printouts for the regulated
emissions. Example printout is included as Table 1.
A. Individual Hydrocarbons, Nickel Carbonyl, N2O and H2S
1. For FTP Evaluations only, convert 2-Bag UDDS to Equivalent
1-Bag UDDS
PPM^CVS FLOW! + PPM2xCVS FLOW2
CVS FLOW! + CVS FLOW2
PPM-jXCVS FLOW-, + PPM,,XCVS FLOW,
PPM 34 = - f - £ - ± - i
CVS FLOWg + PPM FLOW4
2 . Convert PPM to yg/m :
yg/m3 = 35. 32 * DENSITYXPPM
Density, g/ft
Methane CH4
Ethylene C2H^
Ethane C2H6
Acetylene C2H2
H2S
NH3
- 18.86
- 16.50
- 17.68
- 15.33
- 40.12
- 20.05
Propane C^HQ
Propylene C3I
Benzene CgH^
Toluene C7Hg
N2O
Ni(CO)4
- 17.29
i6 - 16.50
- 15.33
- 15.49
- 51.82
-200.99
B. Calculation of
mg/km = ((EXHXSCF - BQXDFC) x VOL^KM^ T 1000
Calculations were performed using a Hewlett Packard
HP-65 Programmable Calculator
Dry (DFC) and (SFC) was used for all unregulated
emissions except: IHC, NO and Ni (CO)
DFC and SCF are obtained from the computer print-out
for regulated emissions. (See Tables 1 and 2.)
C. Metals and Other Elements
COMPONENT WEIGHT ON FILTER = yg/cm x EFF. FILTER AREA
EFF. FILTER AREA =14.3 cm2
COMPONENT yg/m = C.W.O.F. T TOTAL WT. x (yg/m3 for Total Wt.)
A-ll
-------
APPENDIX A-4 (Cont'd). CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
D. Calculation of Average Temperature and Oxygen
INTEGRATOR COUNTS ^ riTTrr „„„,.„ „„,.„„
AV6rage = 6.994 X SECONDS * FULL SCALE VALUE
= % for Oxygen
= MV for Catalyst Temperature
E. Calculation for 4-PTP
Composite 4-FTP = 0.43* (Value for 1&2) + 0.57x (Value for 3&4)
A-12
-------
Appendix A-4 (Cont'd)- CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
TABLE 1. COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE FOR FOUR-BAG FTP
M
Ul
TF.ST NO. RUM
VEHICLE MdflEL
ENGTNF L( CIO)
TRANSMISSION *3
6VH KG( LB3)
BAROMETER MM HG( IN HG )
RELATIVE HUMIDITY PCT
BAG RFS'JLTS
BAG SUMFIFR
DFSCWIPTION
RLOHER OIF P MM. H20(IN, H80)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OON. M*O)
"LOrtER INLET TEMP. r>FG. C(DEG. F)
BLO«FR REVOLUTIONS
cv
-------
APPENDIX A-4 (Cont'd). CALCULATION FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
TABLE 2. DEFINITION OF COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE
FOR FOUR-BAG AND SINGLE-BAG
REGULATED EMISSIONS
The following are primarily exerpts taken from the computer program:
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN: Direct printout of an input
CATALYST AVG. AND MAX. TEMPS.: Input converted to °C and printed-out
C DFC = DILUTION FACTOR CORRECTION DFC = FOR WET SAMPLES DFCD = FOR DRY
DF(J)=13.4/( YC2(2,J) + (( YH(2,J) + CC(2,J))/10000.))
DFC(J) = 1 - 1/DF(J)
C CALCULATE DFC, VOL. KM FOR BAGS 1+2 AND 3+4
C DF = TOTAL CVS FLOW / EXHAUST FLOW = AIR + EXH / EXH
C DFC = 1 - 1/DF = 1 - EXH/(AIR+EXH) = AIR/(AIR+EXH)
DFC12 =(DFC(1)*VMIX(1) + DFC(2)*VMIX(2)) / (VMIX(l) + VMIX(2))
DFC34 = (DFC(3)*VMIX(3) + DFC(4)*VMIX(4)) / (VMIX(3) + VMIX(4))
IF(RH.LT.20) RH = 20
DFCD12 = DFC12 * (1.0 - 0.000323*(RH - 20))
DFCD34 = DFC34 * (1.0 - 0.000323*(RH - 20))
C SCF = SAMPLE CORRECTION FACTOR FOR WATER REMOVAL
SCF12 = 1.000
SCF34 = 1.000
SCFD12 = (SCFD(1)*VMIX(1)+SCFD(2)+VMIX(2)) / (VMIX(l) +
SCFD34 = (SCFD(3)*VMIX(3)+SCFD(4)*VMIX(4)) / (VMIX(3) +
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR:
SCF = FOR WET SCFD=DRY
VMIX(2))
VMIX(4))
C
C
C
C
TFS = TOTAL FUEL SULFUR IN MG/KM
TFS = L/100KM * PCT * G/ML * 1000ML/L * 0.01G/GPCT *
TFS = CBFM * FSWPCT * FPPG * 100.
1000MG/G
CALCULATE 4-BAG EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION
4-BAG = 0.43*(BAG1+BAG2)/(MILES1+MILES2)+0.57*(BAG3+BAG4)/(MILES3+MILES4)
DISTA=MILES(1) + MILES (2)
DISTB=MILES(2) + MILES (3)
DISTC=MILES(3) + MILES (4)
HCWM4 = 0.43*((HCM(1)+HCM(2)) / DISTA) +
COWM4 = 0.43*((COM(1)+COM(2)) / DISTA) +
C02WM4= 0.43*((C02M(1)+C02M(2))/DISTA) +
NOXWM4= 0.43*((NOXM(1)+NOXM(2))/DISTA) +
CBFE4 = 2421. / (,866*HCWM4 + .429*COWM4
0.57*((HCM(3)+HCM(4)) / DISTC)
0.57*((COM(3)+COM(4)) /DISTC)
0.57*((C02M(3)+C02M(4)) / DISTC)
0.57*((NOXM(3)+NOXM(4)) /DISTC)
+ .273*CO2WM4)
A-14
-------
APPENDIX B
MALFUNCTION SCREENING EVALUATIONS
-------
TABLE B-l. SUMMARY OF TASK 1 & 3 MALFUNCTION SCREENING
FTP RESULTS IN rag/km (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH 351 "W" ENGINE
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, 9/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp. , °C
Catalyst Max. Temp. , °C
Carbon Dioxide , g/km
Fuel Cons., Jl/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km
* Carbon Monoxide, g/km
i° Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Unmod.
51Aa
744.3
7.2
24.5
33.73
4.67
468
540
367.2
15.74
0.12
0.74
0.79
11.93
0.21
0.21
0.4
71.8
0.02
0.01
5.04
0.08
0.03
0.00
23.89
W/O Oo
' £.
Sensor
5lBa
743.7
8.5
24.8
31.51
4.78
— -
—
345.4
14.79
0.09
0.49
2.93
7.55
1.02
1.08
9.4
55.8
0.23
0.02
5.36
—
0.00
0.00
16.32
w/o
CTS
51C-2
741.7
10.6
26.7
38.20
0.31
443
553
329.2
17.83
1.53
53.21
1.89
12.98
0.53
0.46
10.3
372.8
0.00
0.03
132.65
49.29
0.45
0.00
73.17
w/o EGR
Sensor
51F-1
753.1
4.4
25.6
36.22
4.34
502
639
394.0
16.90
0.14
0.98
2.90
9.67
7.66
7.05
9.1
81.6
0.56
0.00
6.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
103.63
12%
Misfire
51M-1
738.9
7.5
24.4
37.24
4.08
560
769
404.6
17.38
0.50
0.62
0.75
17.55
3.23
2.89
0.0
82.2
0.23
0.00
0.61
0.04
0.11
0.00
—
DISABLED AIR PUMP
w/o 0?
51BH-1
749.0
4.6
23.9
33.85
0.77
481
584
355.6
15.79
0.52
8.14
2.05
5.34
0.38
0.37
7.1
168.4
0.77
0.00
16.37
6.69
0.14
0.00
43.93
w/o CTS
51CH-2
739.9
6.5
23.9
35.88
0.74
445
588
321.5
16.74
1.54
41.87
1.90
16.97
0.43
0.40
7.8
349.9
0.00
0.03
140.91
26.07
0.35
0.00
60.43
w/o FCA
51KHa
742.0
7.0
25.9
38.05
—
--
541
298.6
17.75
2.29
70.06
0.41
10.25
0.07
0.06
1.7
999.6
0.51
0.01
203.41
35.45
1.06
0.00
17.09
Average values for two tests
-------
TABLE B-l (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF TASK 1 & 3 MALFUNCTION SCREENING
FTP RESULTS IN mg/km (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH 351 "W" ENGINE
DISABLED AIR PUMP
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
7 Methane
w Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sul fides
Carbonyl Sul fide
Methyl Sul fide
Ethyl Sul fide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trim.ethy 1 amine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Unmod.
5lAa
0.06
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.11
—
0.04
—
0.4
0.3
49.85
3.92
6.42
1.92
0.36
1.75
2.53
4.99
71.8
59.8
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
Sensor
51Ba
9.32
o.oc
0.00
0.00
0.05
--
0.00
--
9.4
11.2
38.60
3.43
3.67
1.55
0.17
1.48
2.28
4.56
55.8
65.5
0.23
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
CTS
51C-2
9.00
1.22
0.04
0.00
0.08
—
0.00
—
10.3
0.7
82.54
94.07
12.56
1.98
1.57
38.65
53.51
87.95
372.8
24.4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sensor
51F-1
9.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
—
9.1
6.5
56.30
3.96
6.42
1.36
1.69
1.51
3.84
6.48
81.6
58.3
0.29
0.24
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Misfire
51M-1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
--
0.00
—
0.0
0.0
26.59
5.56
2.20
1.95
0.49
2.61
12.75
30.04
82.2
16.4
0.22
0.01
0.00
0.00
o.oc
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
W/O Oy
51BH-1
6.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.53
—
7.1
1.4
43.24
28.93
7.94
2.49
0.79
14.02
30.79
40.19
168.4
32.4
0.70
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
W/o CTS
51CH-2
7.45
0.00
0.19
0.09
0.10
—
0.00
—
7.8
0.5
80.31
93.01
11.89
1.60
0.99
36.49
48.92
76.71
349.9
22.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
w/o FCA
51KHa
1.50
0.02
0.00
0.07
0.00
--
0.14
—
1.7
0.1
226.49
298.92
27.17
8.30
2.88
105.19
120.07
210.53
999.6
43.5
0.24
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Average values for two tests
-------
TABLE B-l (COnt'd). SUMMARY OF TASK 1 & 3 MALFUNCTION SCREENING
FTP RESULTS IN mg/km (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH 351 "W" ENGINE
Test Number, PVM-ST
Trace Elements *>
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
® Sodium
** Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Tin
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
2n
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
Sn
w/o 02 w/o
Unmod. Sensor CTS
15Aa 5iBa 51C_2
0.01 0.02
0.10
0.01 0.05
0.02
0.06 0.01 0.08
0.12 0.43 0.20
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.08 0.05 0.22
0.11
1.23 0.19 1.53
0.01 0.09
0.02 0.01 0.10
0.01
w/o EGR
Sensor
51F-1
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.06
2.96
0.01
0.04
1.41
0.04
0.06
12%
Misfire
51M-1
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.07
1.25
7.28
0.01
2.49
0.02
0.02
DISABLED AIR
w/o C>2
51BH-1
0.01
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.65
0.02
0.02
w/o CTS
51CH-2
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.13
0.09
0.05
0.91
0.05
0.05
0.01
PUMP
W/o FCA
SIKHS
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.39
0.01
0.01
Average values for two tests
Values for all spaces left blank are 0.00
-------
TABLE B-2. MALFUNCTION SCREENING REPEAT FTP RESULTS
IN mg/km (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH 351 "W" ENGINE
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature ,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
9/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °c
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., &/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons , (THC) ,
Carbon Monoxide,
Oxides of Nitrogen,
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
g/km
g/km
g/km
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
51A-1
742.2
6.
25.
33.
4.
470
538
366.
15.
0.
0.
0.
14.
0.
0.
6
0
58
62
1
67
12
43
86
10
32
32
51A-2
746.3
7.7
23.9
33.87
4.72
466
542
368.3
15.80
0.12
1.04
0.71
9.76
0.10
0.10
DISABLED
0? SENSOR
51B-1
749.8
3.9
22.8
30.89
4.11
—
—
340.1
14.58
0.09
0.75
2.57
9.65
1.06
1.14
51B-2
737.6
13.0
26.7
32.12
5.40
470
578
350.6
14.99
0.08
0.22
3.28
5.45
0.98
1.02
DISABLED CTS
and AIR PUMP
51CH-1
738
12
25
45
-
-
550
292
21
3
122
1
49
0
0
.9
.7
.6
.51
-
-
.9
.23
.78
.56
.91
.47
.72
.53
51CH-2
739.9
6.5
23.9
35.88
0.74
445
588
321.5
16.74
1.54
41.87
1.90
16.97
0.43
0.40
DISABLED FCA
and AIR PUMP
51KH-1
743.5
4.8
25.0
39.05
0.27
—
538
307.1
18.22
2.31
71.58
0.37
9.30
0.07
0.06
51KH-2
740.4
9.2
26.7
37.04
—
—
544
290.1
17.28
2.26
68.53
0.45
11.20
0.07
0.06
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.2
71.8
0.04
0.02
9.13
0.12
0.06
0.00
23.87
0.5
71.7
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.04
0.00
0.00
23.90
8.3
61.0
0.25
0.02
8.13
0.00
0.00
15.49
10.5
50.5
0.21
0.01
2.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.15
8.5
1396.4
0.01
0.01
48.71
15.98
0.58
0.00
21.31
7.8
349.9
0.00
0.03
140.91
26.07
0.35
0.00
60.43
0.0
1005.7
0.92
0.00
218.09
32.21
1.69
0.00
18.92
3.4
993.4
0.02
189.73
38.68
0.42
0.00
15.26
-------
TABLE B-2 (Cont'd). MALFUNCTION SCREENING REPEAT FTP RESULTS
IN mg/km (EXCEPT AS NOTED
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH 351 "W" ENGINE
UNMODIFIED
09
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC,
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC,
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
51A-1
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.08
0.2
0.2
49.56
3.56
6.49
2.11
0.57
1.77
2.36
5.36
71.8
59.8
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
51A-2
0.08
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.5
0.4
50.14
4.27
6.35
1.72
0.15
1.73
2.70
4.62
71.7
59.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
DISABLED
O? SENSOR
51B-1
8.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.3
9.2
42.53
3.86
3.80
1.86
0.01
1.44
2.52
4.95
61.0
67.8
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
51B-2
10.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
10.5
13.1
34.66
3.00
3.54
1.24
0.33
1.51
2.03
4.17
50.5
63.1
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
DISABLED CTS
and AIR PUMP
51CH-1
4.93
2.93
0.45
0.00
0.18
0.00
8.5
0.2
490.58
451.03
40.29
33.46
1.81
62.64
137.09
179.53
1396.4
36.9
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51CH-2
7.45
0.00
0.19
0.09
0.10
0.00
7.8
0.5
80.31
93.01
11.89
1.60
0.99
36.49
48.92
76.71
349.9
22.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
DISABLED FCA
and AIR PUMP
51KH-1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
218.99
296.43
25.89
9.80
3.05
108.64
124.50
218.36
1005.7
43.0
0.39
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51KH-2
3.00
0.04
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.27
3.4
0.2
233.98
301.40
28.45
6.79
2.71
101.73
115.64
202.69
993.4
44.0
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Trace Elements a
Chromium Cr
Lead Pb
Manganese Mn
Arsenic As
Mercury Hg
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Tin
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
TABLE B-2 (Cont'd). MALFUNCTION SCREENING REPEAT FTP RESULTS
IN mg/km (EXCEPT AS NOTED)
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH 351 "W" ENGINE
UNMODIFIED
51A-1
0.01
0.02
0.11
0.16
0.09
2.22
51A-2
0.01
0.07
0.07
0.24
0.01 0.01
0,02 0.02
DISABLED
°2 SENSOR
51B-1
0.41
0.07
0.18
0.01
5 IB-2
0.01
0.44
0.02
0.19
0.01
DISABLED CTS
and AIR PUMP
DISABLED FCA
and AIR PUMP
51CH-1
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.17
0.07
0.96
0.02
0.02
51CH-2 51KH-1
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.05 0.02
0.13 0.02
0.09
0.05
0.91 0.12
0.05
0.05 0.01
0.01
51KH-2
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.65
0.01
0.01
Values for all spaces left blank are 0.00
-------
TABLE B-3. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
51A-1
COLD-UDDS
19.53
0.37
14.88
0.29
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Unmodified
HOT-UDDS
10.01
0.29
4.80
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.14
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
51 A- 2
COLD-UDDS
5.58
0.08
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.75
o.oo
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
o.oo
0.00
Unmodified
HOT-UDDS
12.92
0.11
1.53
0.00
0.00
0.05
o.oo
0.05
0.00
0.06
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
B-8
-------
TABLE B-4. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
51B-1
Without 02
COLD-UDDS
10.77
1.68
11.36
—
0.00
8.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sensor
HOT-UDDS
9.01
0.60
5.85
—
0.00
8.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
51B-2
Without O2
COLD-UDDS
10.82
0.18
3.22
0.00
0.00
10.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.47
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sensor
HOT-UDDS
1.40
1.59
2.11
0.00
0.00
10.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-9
-------
TABLE B-5 . FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Mo nome thy1ami ne
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
51C-2
Without
COLD-UDDS
5.67
0.62
239.09
110.03
0.96
0.07
2.83
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CTS
HOT-UDDS
18.50
0.47
52.36
3.46
0.06
15.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
51F-
Without
COLD-UDDS
12.02
8.04
11.55
0.00
0.00
9.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.40
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
EGR Sensor
HOT-UDDS
7.89
7.38
3.37
o.oo
0.00
8.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.12
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-10
-------
TABLE B-6 . FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
He xanaIdehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
51M-1
12 Percent
COLD-UDDS
24.13
2.73
1.41
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Misfire
HOT-UDDS
12.58
3.60
0.00
0.06
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51BH-1
Air Pump
COLD-UDDS
6.41
0.39
10.23
15.56
0.21
5.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.04
1.41
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Disabled
Without 02
HOT-UDDS
4.53
0.38
21.01
0.00
0.09
7.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.17
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-ll
-------
TABLE B-7 . FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylaraine
51CH-1
Disabled
Air Pump Without CTS
COLD-UUDS
79.10
0.82
80.86
36.57
1.35
0.99
6.82
0.80
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
27.12
0.63
24.45
0.44
0.00
7.90
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51CH-2
Air Pump
COLD-UDDS
16.67
0.33
254.68
60.05
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
Disabled
Without CTS
HOT-UDDS
17.19
0.50
55.09
0.44
o.oo
13.07
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-12
-------
TABLE B-8
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine & dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
51KH-1
Air Pump
COLD-UDDS
12.16
0.16
204.49
6.33
1.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Disabled
Without FCA
HOT-UDDS
7.15
0.01
228.35
51.74
1.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51KH-2
Air Pump
COLD-UDDS
11.27
0.10
184.91
28.31
0.33
0.00
3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Disabled
Without FCA
HOT-UDDS
11.14
0.05
193.37
46.51
0.49
0.00
3.06
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.27
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-13
-------
D TABLE B-9, TEST NO, 51A-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - SIA FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-5102-001
TEST NO. 51A-1
VEHICLE MODEL
RUN 1
MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINf 5.7 LOS1 CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?»3» KG( S3b5 LBS)
BAROMETER 7*2. IS MM H.G(29.22 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 33 PCT
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
HLOWER UJLET P MM. HaociN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO* STO. Cll. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
MC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
„
03
£ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
COS MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OFG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCr WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 51A-1
BAROMETF.R MM HG 7*S.S
HUMIDITY G/KG b.t.
TEHPERATURE OEG C 2S.O
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 3/ 1/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
COLD TRANSIENT
25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
b.b GM/KG
STABILIZED
TEST WEIGHT 2011 KGC HSOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-311
ODOMETER 1-J1H KM( 897 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .88
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
13.3 (110.0)
10b97
7b.O (2bB3.3)
50. 2/ 2/ 50
12. I/ 2/ 12
I9.b/l2/ IDS
2.1/12/ 1
8b.8/ 3/ l.bl
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
78. 2/ 2/ 78
l.l/ 2/ 1
8.21
to
102
1.5b
77.2
1.73
8.98
2171.2
9.89
.30
1.55
375. H
J. 71
lb.17
505
1.97
38*
525
5.79
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
13.3 (110.0)
b9fa93
130.1 (1591.1)
15. 9/ 8/ lb
ii.3/ a/ 11
7.1/13/ 7
2.0/13/ 2
5b.8/ 3/ 1.00
3.S/ 3/ .05
15. B/ 2/ lb
1.2/ 2/ 1
13.37
5
5
.95
11.7
.11
.71
22b3.2
3.22
.07
.12
3b8.n
.52
15.72
8b?
l.bO
197
533
b.15
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
13.3 (110.0)
10b20
75.8 (2b77.9)
23. 9/ 2/ 21
13. I/ 2/ 13
12.8/13/ 12
1.2/13/ 1
80. 7/ 3/ 1.18
3.S/ 3/ .05
38. I/ 2/ 38
l.l/ 2/ 1
1.01
12
11
1.11
37.1
.51
.95
l9Sl,b
1.78
.09
.lb
315.0
.83
11.75
505
1.12
153
538
5.78
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
12.2 (108.0)
b9b31
130.2 (1599.3)
15. V g/ lb
12. ?/ 2/ 13
fa.b/13/ b
l.b/13/ 2
59. H/ 3/ 1.05
3.2/ 3/ .05
lb.9/ e/ l?
l.l/ 2/ 1
12.72
1
5
1.01
15.9
.32
.73
2398.8
3.19
.05
.12
389.1
.57
Ib.b2
8b7
1.11
197
525
b.lb
.908 (
1.000 ( .985)
20b.l
11.91
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 33.32
AVG. FXH. OXYGEN PCT l.bB
CATALYST AVG. TEMp. DEG C *70
CATALVSr MAX. TE«P. DEG C 538
.909 ( ,90b)
1.000 ( .985)
20b.O
11.95
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
3b3.2
IS. 55
.12
.»3
.85
(t-BAG)
( 3b9.»)
( 15.81)
( .12)
( .»3)
( .87)
-------
TABLE B-10. TEST NO. 51A-2EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 5U FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
TEST NO. 51*-? RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(35l CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?H3» KG( 53h5 LBS)
BAROMETER 7»b.2s MM HG(29.38 IN HO
RELATIVE HUMIDITY HI PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H?0(IN. H50)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H2odN. H2o)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
K
H
Ui
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
Co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/ldOKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF» WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 51A-2
BAROMETgR MM MG 7Hb.3
HUMIDITY G/KG 7.7
TEMPERATURE DEG c 23.9
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 3/lb/79
BAG CART NO. 1
OYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.fl DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 7.7 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 20H1 KGC HSOO LBS)
ACTU*L R.OAO LOAD 8.9 K*( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE £M-3HH
ODOMETER 1572 KM( 977 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .11
COLD TRANSIENT
77H.7 (30.5)
7b2.0 (30.0)
"»3.3 (UO.O)
7b.7 (5710. b)
5H.2/ 2/ 5H
b.9/ 2/ 7
71.3/I1/ 307
e.3/11/ 7
8H.H/ 3/ l.Sb
3.3/ 3/ .05
SH.S/ 2/ Sf
l.O/ !/ i
8. HO
H8
?87
1.58
53. fa
2.13
25. b9
2131. b
7.15
.37
H.48
371.3
1.25
lb.20
SU5
STABILIZED
77H.7 (30.5)
7b2.0 (30.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
b9881
131.8 (HbSfa.S)
12.»/ 2/ 12
8.7/ 2/ 9
b.9/13/ 7
5H2
S.7-»
.908 ( .902)
1.000 ( .982)
208. b
11.R7
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MQ/KM 33.87
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT •».72
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG c »bb
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG C 5»2
58.I/ 3/ 1.03
3.7/ 3/ .Ob
l.O/ 2/ 1
13.05
13.2
.33
.50
23H9.0
3.02
.05
.08
3B3.0
.H 9
lb.3b
870
H.78
H85
521
b.13
HOT TRANSIENT
77H.7 (30.5)
7b2.0 (30.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
H05S1
7b.5 (2702.1)
15. 5/
7. I/
19.H/1
2/
2/
13/
2.5/13/
78. 2/
3.3/
32. 2/
1.2X
3/ J
3/
z/
2/
15
7
18
a
L .^3
.05
32
1
9
Ib
1.39
31.1
.HO
19H3.7
.07
338.3
.72
1H.H7
50H
4.73
HH9
538
5.7H
.913 ( .907)
1.000 ( .983)
208.2
11.88
3-BAG
STABILIZED
77H.7 (30.5)
7b2.0 (30.0)
»3.3 (110.11)
b9790
131.7 (HbSO.2)
11.7/ 2/ 12
sIs/13/ b
2.0/13/ 2
5b.7/ 3/ 1.00
3.S/ 3/ .OS
1H.U/ 2/ 1H
l.l/ S/ i
13.HI
5
H
13.0
.37
.5b
2285.8
.Ob
.D"*
372.7
.»8
15.92
870
H.bB
H90
538
b.13
(H-8AG)
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
15.80
.12
l.OH
.71
( 15.b8)
( .13)
( l.OH)
( .71)
-------
PVM -
TABLE B-ll. TEST NO. 51B-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
SIB FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED 02 SENSOR
PROJECT 11-SH02-001
TEST NO. 51B1 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LC351 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GyH 2<»3'» KG( S3b5 LB3)
BAROMETER 7«H.8l MM HG(?9.S2 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 83 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HSOUN.
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
tfl
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SlBi
BAROMETER MM HG 7*4.8
HUHIDITr G/KG 3.1
JtMPERtTURE DEe C 22. S
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 2/19/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEG C(73.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 3.9 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 2041 KG( HSOO LB3)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 1?.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3H*
ODOMETER 1831 KM{ 7b5 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .8?
COLD TRANSIENT
787. H (31.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
»2.8 (109.0)
229
13
STABILIZED
77.3 (2729.0)
•u.7/ 2/ t?
11. b/ 2/ 15
93.b/l2/
7.1/12/
77. 9/ 3/ 1.H3
3.3/ 3/ .05
»9.e/ 3/ IfB
.b/ 3/ 2
31
210
1.38
ltb.0
l.«»0
18.85
19S».3
17. b»
3.23
33*. 8
3.02
It.St
SOS
4.12
S.8» b.23
.<»1H ( .913)
1.000 ( .989)
209.5
12.Ob
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
787. » (31.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
b9731
132.2 (»bbB.9)
13. b/ 2/ !•»
10. 3/ ?/ 10
11. V13/ 11
lO.t/13/ 10
Sb.O/ 3/ .98
3.S/ 3/ .OS
bO.«/ It bO
I.*/ 2/ 1
19.58
.,
2
.93
59.1
.31
.30
22bl.b
12.22
.05
.05
3b3.3
1 ,9b
15.51
Bb7
3.9b
787.* (31.0)
7b?.0 (30.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
*0b97
77.2 (272*. 9)
1*.9/ 2/ IS
8.S/ 2/ S
18.7/13/ 18
5.0/13/ 5
71. 1/ 3/ 1.29
3.*/ 3/ .05
5H.B/ 3/ IbH
.b/ 3/ 2
10.39
7
13
1.2*
lb2.B
.32
l.lb
1751.3
iS.b*
.Ob
.20
300.7
3.37
12.85
SOb
*.S8
787.* (31.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
H3.3 (110. 0)
bSbSO
132.1 (HbbS.3)
10. 3/ 2/ 10
8.5/ 2/ 9
5.8/13/ b
H.3/13/ *
S*.7/ 3/ .9b
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
79. b/ 2/ 80
1.7/ 2/ 2
13. "»b
2
2
.91
78.0
.18
.25
219t.5
lb.12
.03
.O*
351.5
2.58
15.01
6b8
f .70
5.82 b.2«
.<»19 ( .918)
1.000 ( .189)
209.2
12.07
TOT*L FUEL SULFUR MG/KM
AVS. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC C
31.2*
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIOE3 OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
3*0.1
1».S8
.09
.75
2.57
(»-BAG)
(
(
(
(
(
33b.7)
1*.»3)
.08)
.75)
2.75)
-------
TABLE B-12, TEST NO. 51D-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
- 51B FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED 0 SENSOR
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
TEST NO. SIR-? RUN 1
VEHICLE *OOEL ?* MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 Lf95j CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION 41
KG( «53b5 LBS1
IN HG)
BAROMETER 737. b? MM
RELATIVE HijMioiTY 58 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIP P MM. H?0(IM. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?O(IN. H?n)
BLOWER INLFT TEMP. OEG. CCDEG. n
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO SAMPLE MFTER/RAWGf /PPM
co HCKGRn MFTER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PCT
co? HCKGBO MFTF.R/HANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
NOX 8CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
w DILUTION FACTOR
I
^ HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GR*MS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GR*MS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C»
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. PXVGEN PEP-CENT
CATALYST AVfi. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MtASt)RFD)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SlB-2
BARQMETFR MM HG 737. b
HUMIDITY G/KG 13.0
TEMPERATURE OEG C ?b.7
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 3/1S/7S
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO, 3
CVS NO. S
DRY BULB TEMP. ?b,7 DEG CC80.0 DEG P)
ABS, HUMIDITY la.O GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 20H1 KG( »SOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8,9 K«( 12,0 HP)
GASOLINE EM.3*«
ODOMETER IbOB KM( <»99 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOW 1,08
COLD TRANSIENT
1 (30.0)
73b.b (29,0)
»».H (112,0)
STABILIZED
7b8.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
»3.9 (111.0)
.912 ( .901)
1.000 ( .977)
?0b,2
11.98
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 32,12
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT S.»0
CATALYST AVG. TEMP, DF.G t H70
CATALYST MAX. T£MP. DEC C 578
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b,b (89,0)
<*b,l (115,0)
7b.O (2bBb,l)
38. 5/ 2/ 38
8. I/ ?/ 8
bt.1/13/ b2
8. 2/1 3/ B
82. O/ 3/ 1.51
3.S/ 3/ .05
50. 0/ 3/ 150
1.3/ 3/ »
8.81
31
52
l.tb
lHb.5
1.37
t.b?
2038.5
23,05
."
|eo
351.9
3.98
15.11
505
5.83
398
S»b
5.79
130.1 (*S95,«O
9.5/ ?/ 10
8.0/ 2/ 8
8.8/13/ 9
b.7/13/ 7
55, 3/ 3/ ,97
3.9/ 3/ .Ob
b».8/ 2/ bS
!,»/ ?/ 1
13.79
2
2
.91
b3.S
>lh
.3*
2179, H
17,09
.03
.Ob
352.1
2.7b
15. 0»
8b7
5.72
»79
512
b.19
7b.O (2b8S,b)
lb,t/ ?/
B,*/ It
11.7/13/
* ,b/13X
81, O/ 3/ J
3,9/ 3/
Hb.O/ 3/
,b/ 3/
8.97
9
7
I,*1*
13b.if
.39
,bO
8001, •»
21. »5
.07
.10
3Hb,8
3.72
1».B2
505
» .10
»97
578
5.77
Ib
8
11
«»
l,*9
,0b
138
2
,911 ( ,900)
1,000 ( .977)
20b.?
11,98
STABILIZED
7b?,0 (30.0)
73b,b (29,0)
»b.i (115,0)
b9bl»
130,2 (»597,1)
IH.f/ 2/ 1*
9,3/ 2/ 9
b.1/13/ b
3.5/13/ 3
58,0/ 3/ 1.02
3.B/ 3/ ,0b
59,b/ 2/ bO
l.b/ S/ 2
13.07
b
3
58.1
2310,9
15, b5
.07
,0b
372,1*
2.52
15,91
8b8
<»,0t»
S3b
5fe7
b,21
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
350, b
1»,99
,08
.22
3.28
(«-BAG)
( 3Sb.b)
( 15.25)
( ,09)
( .23)
( 3.21)
-------
PVM -
TABLE B-13, TEST NO. 51C-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
SIC FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED CTS
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
TEST NO. sic-e RUN i
VEHICLE MOOFL 79 MERCIikY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH PHI KG( 53b5 LBS)
BAROMETER 711. b8 MM HGC?q.2D IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 18 PCT
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMHER
DESCRIPTION
BLOrtEP OIF P MM. H?.0(IN. H20)
HLOHER INLET P MM. HSOCIN. Heo)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER HfVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. Cll. MFTRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLF; ME TER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD ME fER/RANi;E/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGEXPCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKRRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
03
(-• HC CONCENTRATION PPM
00 Co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCFINTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
Co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/1DOKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CAIALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST KAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCr WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER S1C-2
BAROMEUR MM HG 711.7
HUMIDITY G/KG 10.b
TEMPERATURE Of6 C gb.7
VEHICLE NO. SI
DATE 3/21/71
SAG CART NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 2b.7 DEC CC80.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.b GM/KG
TEST MEIGHI 2011 KG{ 1SOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD a.s K«( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3HH
ODOMETER 0 KMC -0 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
1
COLD TRANSIENT
771.7 (30.S)
7h2.0 (30.0)
13.3 (lln.O)
7b
2b.
1.
5S.
.
78.
3.
10.
1.
.2 (2bBS.B)
O/ 3X
3/ 3/
IX 2X
I/ 2/
3X 3/
bX 3X
7X 2X
3X 2X
7.3b
3b80
1.38
3S.h
32K.35
5.75
1.87
55.77
328.3
.18
1R.01
505
.55
3bb
538
5.85
2bO
13
3850
b
1.13
.Ob
11
1
STABILIZED
7h2.0 (30.0)
787. * (31.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
blbS*
130.2
18. b/ 3/
1.3/ 3/
52. S/ 2/
52. H/ 3/
3,b/ 3/
9.H/ 2/
l.O/ 2/
10. bB
18b
13
339*
18
.«»!
.Ob
32fab
.8b
8.5
13.08
20tb,8
2.11
2. OS
7S.1*
327.0
.3t
IS. 55
BbB
.35
S12
.8
-------
TABLE B-14, TEST NO, 51F-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - SlF FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS • DISABLED EGR SENSOR
PROJECT ii-sioa-ooi
TEST NO. siF-i RUN i
VEHICLE MODEL '•» MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINF 5.7 LOSI cio v-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GV* ?•»?» KG( S3b5 L8S)
VEHICLE NO.
DATE
BAG CART NO
OYNO NO.
CVS NO.
51
TEST HEIGHT 20*1 KG( HSOO L8S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.^ KWC Xa.O HP)
GASOLINE EM-3; IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 22 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAR "(UMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWFB INLET P MM. HSOUN. H20)
PLOrtER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
HLOWFR REVOLUTIONS
CVS PLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
flCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPI E METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRO MF.TEK/RANGE/PCT
NPX SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
NOX RCKGRO MFTER/RANGE/PPM
OIIUHON FACTOR
td
H HC CONCENTRATION PPM
* CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C{P CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
co? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/lfinKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. OEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCFr WET (ORY)
VOL (SCMJ
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SlF-1
BAROMETER MM HG 753.1
HUMIDITY G/KG 4.H
TEMPERATURE OFG c 25.h
DRY BULB TEMP. 25. b DEC C(78.0 OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY H.S GM/KG
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.63
COLD TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
43.3 (110.0)
40b33
77.7 (2743.2)
55.2/ 2/ 55
13.S/ 2/ 13
133.3 (4707.8)
1B.4/ 2/ 18
13.3/ 2/ 13
13.3/13/ 13
12.3/ 3/ 1
4.I/ 3/
>3.1/ 3/
.b/ 3/
7.b3
239
I.b7
127.7
l.SS
2377.9
15.72
.33
3.b3
398.B
2.fat
17.31
505
473
S.9b
4
.73
,0b
b2.5/ 3/ 1.11
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
31.b/ 3/ 95
.b/ 3/ 2
12.01
b
9
I.Ob
93.1
2585.
.08
C .
3.13
17.bl
8b8
518
bOb
b.28
l.noo
211.0
12.24
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
43.3 (110.0)
40bl9
77.7 (2742.B)
22.0/ 2/ 22
8.9/ 2/ 9
29.3/13/ 28
1.8/13/ 2
82.b/ 3/ 1.52
3.3/ 3/ .05
42.9/ 3/
.4/ 3/
8.77
25
1.48
127.b
.b3
2.28
2105.2
15.71
.11
35b.8
2.bb
15.27
505
4.30
580
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
43.3 (110.0)
b9b40
133.1 (4702.0)
14.7/ 2/ 15
8.S/ 2/ S
10.2/13/ 10
2.0/13/ 2
bl.?/ 3/ 1.10
3.9/ 3/ .Ob
31.5/ 3/ 94
.5/ 3/ 2
12.19
7
8
1.04
93.1
.50
1.21
2540.1
19.b4
.08
.19
404.5
3.13
17.29
Bb8
4.37
518
bOl
b.28
[ .90b)
1.000 ( .988)
210.8
12.18
TOTAL FUEL
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG. TEMP.
CATALYST MAX. TEMP.
MG/KM 3b.?a
PCT 4.3*
DEG C 502
OEG C b39
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
3-BAG
394.0
lb.90
.14
.98
2.90
(4-BAG)
( 391.8)
( lb.81)
( .14)
( .97)
( 2.90)
-------
PVM -
TABLE B-15. TEST NO. 51M-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
SIM FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - IS PCT. MISFIRE
PROJECT 11-5102-001
TEST MO. SIM-l RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVM 2131 KG( 53b5 LB3)
BAROMETER 738.89 MM HG(29.09 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY SB PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HZQCIN. Mao)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PpM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE a/87/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
W
I
to
o
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
COLD TRANSIENT
21.1 DEG C(7b.O OEG F)
7.S GM/KG
STABILIZED
TEST WEIGHT 20*1 KG( 1500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD e.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-311
ODOMETER 13bb KM( 819 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .91
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCr WET (DRY)
SCFr WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SIM-l
BAROMETER MM HG 738.9
HUMIDITY 6/KG 7.5
TEMPERATURE DEC c ?».»
7b2.0 (30.0)
73fa.b (29.0)
13.9 (111.0)
10719
7b.2 (2b92.3)
28. 9/ 3/ 289
2. I/ 3/ 21
51.3/12/ 120
S.8/12/ 10
91. b/ 3/ 1.77
1.0/ 3/ ,0b
80. 9/ 2/ 81
1.7/ 2/ 2
7.38
2b8
lOb
1,72
79.1
11.79
9.10
2103.5
10.18
2.01
l.bO
109.2
1.79
17.85
505
1.79
-
7b9
5.B7
7fa2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
13.3 (110.0)
b981b
130.7 (Iblb.b)
20. b/ 2/ 21
19. 7/ 2/ 20
18.5/13/ 18
9.5/13/ 9
bl.l/ 3/ 1.11
3.5/ 3/ .05
11. B/ 2/ IS
1.9/ 2/ 2
11. b7
3
9
1.10
13.1
.20
1.33
2b23.1
2.9b
.03
.21
119.7
.17
17.93
8b8
1.02
b78
713
b.25
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
13.3 (110.0)
lObbl
7b.l (2b88.8)
Ib.O/ 2/ Ib
Ib.?/ 2/ Ib
Sl.2/13/ 19
1.8/13/ 5
8b.9/ 3/ l.bl
3.5/ 3/ .05
23. 9/ 2/ 21
1.7/ 2/ 2
B.8b
32
13
1.57
22.1
1.39
3.78
2183.5
2.95
.21
.bS
372.8
.50
15.98
SOS
3.72
bll
7b9
5.8b
7b2.0 (30.
73b.b (29.
13.3 (110
b9795
0)
0)
.0)
130.7 (IblS. a)
17. B/ 2/
IS.?/ 2/
15.1/13/
1.0/13/
b3.3/ 3/ 1
1.3/ 3/
12. 1/ 2/
1.7/ 2/
11.81
3
11
1.07
10. S
.?b
1. b3
essb.s
2.39
.01
,2b
108.3
.38
17.15
BbB
3.80
b81
721
b.2b
18
Ib
15
1
.13
.07
12
2
,89b ( .891)
1.000 ( .981)
20b.1
12.12
.902 ( .897)
1.000 ( .982)
12.12
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TE*P. 0£G C
37.21
1.08
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
101. b
17.38
.50
.b2
.75
(1-BAG)
( 101.2)
( 17.21)
( .50)
( .bl)
( .73)
-------
TABLE B-16, TEST NO, 51SH-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - SIR FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS • 013. 0 SEN. t NO AIR
PROJECT 11-5*03-001
TEST MO. S1BH-1 RUN 1
VEHTCl.t MODEL 71 MERCURY MAROIJIS
ENGINF S.7 LOS1 CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW P*3* KC,( 5JK5 LBS)
to
FR 7*9.US MM HG(29.*9 IN HG)
RELATIVF HUMIDITY ?s PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HZOON.
PLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD MFTF.R/RANGF./PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MF.TER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METFR/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MF1ER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
no CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GPAMS/KM
COP GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVT,. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET CDRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 51BH-1
RAPOMETER MM HG 7*9.n
HUMIDITY G/KG ».b
TEMPERATURE OEG c 23.9
VEHICLE NO. si
HATE 3/ s/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
ORY BULB TEMP. 23.1 DEG C(75.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY *.b GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT soil KGC »suo LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-31f
ODOMETER 0 KM( -0 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
.83
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
(
1.000 ( .987)
210.2
12.Ib
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 33.85
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT .77
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DFG C »81
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC C 58*
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30. n)
73b.b (29.0)
*2.8 (109.0)
*0b50
77.3 (2731.5)
13. 3/ 3/ 133
l.l/ 3/ 11
37. O/ 3/ 877
.b/ 3/ 1*
83. O/ 3/ 1.S3
*.*/ 3/ .07
3*.*/ 3/ 103
,7/ 3/ 2
8.22
123
832
l.*7
101.*
5.50
71. 9b
2085. b
12. *8
.93
12. 7*
35*.*
2.12
lh.ll
505
.50
383
Sb3
5.89
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
*2.2 (108.0)
b9755
132.8 (*b91.3)
Sb.S/ 2/ 5b
9.9/ 2/ JO
8b.8/ll/ *1B
3.2/11/ 10
57. 3/ 3/ 1.01
*.b/ 3/ .07
33. 2/ 2/ 33
2.8/ 2/ 3
12. b9
*7
318
.9*
30. b
3.b3
bl.55
2297.1
b.*8
.58
9.81
3bb.O
1.03
lb.3b
8bR
.58
508
S*b
b.28
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
*ObOO
77.2 (2725.1)
25. 0/ 2/ 25
11. 7/ 2/ 12
SO.b/12/ 112
3.3/12/ b
80. 2/ 3/ l.*7
4.7/ 3/ .07
b3.2/ 3/ 190
.8/ 3/ 2
1.01
15
102
1.11
187.5
.bS
9.21
1111.7
23.03
.11
1.5b
337.1
3.10
1*.S1
SOS
1.55
*7b
58*
5.11
11
b
5
93
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
b9S8b
132.2 (*b70.5)
11.a/ 2/ 11
11.I/ 2/
5.9/13/
*.1/13/
58.2/ 3/ 1.03
4.3/ 3/ .07
93.3/ 2/
2.0/ 2/
13.02
1
1
.97
11.5
.07
.11
23*0.0
19.2b
.01
.03
37*.2
3.08
15.97
8b7
1.15
501
55*
b.25
.911 ( .101)
1.000 ( .187)
209.*
12.Ib
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
355. b
15.71
.52
8.14
2. US
(4-BAG)
( 358.0)
( 15. b8)
( . 3b)
( 5.27)
( 2.b5)
-------
TABLEB-17. .
PVM - SIC FTP VEHI
TEST NO. SlCH-l RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL ?«* MERCURY MARHUIS
EHGINF s.7 LO5i CIO) v-n
TRANSMISSION *1
GVK ?H3H KG( S3»*S LBS)
BAPnMFTER 738.99 "M HG(?9.t)9 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bo PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAR NUMBER
HLOWEH OIF P KM. HP.OUN. H?0)
RLOWFH IMLtT P MM. HPO(IN. H?.U)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
cu SAMPLE MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
co HCKGPD MFTER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE MFTF.R/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRO MffFH/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX HCKGPD HF1ER/RANGE/PPM
w DILUTION FACTOR
£> HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOV CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KP
CO? GRAMS/M
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUfL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/lflDKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
Avn. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, HF.T (DRY)
SCF, WFT (DRY)
VOL (3CM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SlCH-l
BAROMETER MM HG 738.1
Ht/MIPITY G/KG IS. 7
TEMPERATURE OEG C 25.b
PROJECT
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 3/ S/79
RAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 8
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.b DEG C(7B.O DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.7 GM/KG
NO AIR
TEST HEIGHT 20*1 KG( *500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW£ 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3H*
ODOMETER l»7b KM( 917 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
1
COLD TRANSIENT
7b?,0 (30.0)
73b.b (8S.O)
S3.3 (lln.O)
STABILIZED
7K3.ll (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
HOT TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
STABILIZED
7b?.0 (30.0)
73b.b (59.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
b9772
7b.l (2bB7.7) 130
8b.O/ 3/ 8bO 3M.
1.7/ 3/ 17 ?.
9b.5/ 1/1557* b?.
.*/ I/ 22
bO.l/ 3/ I.Ob *b.
3.2/ 3/ .05 3.
8.S/ 2/ 9 1*.
l.O/ 2/ 1
S.Ob
8*b
1*935
1.03
7.7
37.15
1333.*!
1*2S.2
1.20
b.*7
230.**
2*8.9
.21
2b.9S
50*
.3b
*78
5.7*
,8bO { .8*9)
1.000 ( .979)
20b.b
11.89
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM »5.51
AVG. EXH
CATALYST
CATALYST
. OXYGEN pCT
AVG. TEMP. DEG C
MAX. TEMP. DEC C 550
.5 (*b!0.9)
9/ 3/ 399
2/ 3/ 22
7/ I/ b053
S/ I/ 51
*/ 3/ .BO
B/ 3/ .Ob
M 2/ 1*
7/ 2/ 1
S.*2
379
5798
.75
13.5
28.5fa
881. Hb
1783. b
3.bO
*.b5
1*3. *8
290.3
.59
22. b*
8b7
.5*
*bb
b.l*
CARBON
7b.O (2b8*.B)
31. ?/ i/ 32
IB.*/ 2/ 18
S9.1/12/ 132
lb.3/12/ 32
77. 2/ 3/ l.*l
3.1*/ 3/ .Ob
70. 1/ 3/ 210
,S/ 3/ 2
1.39
15
98
1.3b
20S.O
.b?
8.bb
18SO.S
32. *8
.12
1.52
331.1
S.b9
1*.25
505
-
550
5.71
.91H (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
130. b (*b!3.5
15, i/ 2/
1S.8/ 2/
27.0/13/
25.b/13/
Sb.b/ 3/ l
*.3/ 3/
37. 8/ 3/
.7/ 3/
13. *0
-3
3
.S3
109.7
-.2*
2235. b
29.29
-.0*
.Ob
3bb.O
H.80
15. b2
8b8
-
5*2
b.ll
.902)
.97b)
20b.b
11.8?
3-SAG
2S2.1
21.23
3.78
122. 5b
1 .**!
15
20
2b
2*
.00
.07
112
2
1
(
(
C
(
(
(*-BAG)
315.^)
e.*o)
( 80.20)
3.15)
-------
TABLE B-18, TEST NO, 51CH-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - SIC FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - 01S. CTS * NO AIR
PROJECT 11-5102-001
CD
I
to
to
TEST NO. 51CH-2 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 7i MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE s.7 LOSI ciO) v-s
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2131 KG( S3bS LBS)
BAROMETER 731.10 MM HG(21.13 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 31 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HBOC IN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW 3TD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
COS SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCf WET (DRY)
SCFr WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SlCH-2
BAROMETER MM HG 739.1
HUMIDITY G/KG b.S
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.1
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 3/23/71
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.1 DEG C(7S.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY b.S GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 20*1 KG( 1500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.1 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-311
ODOMETER Ibll KM( lOSb MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .88
COLD TRANSIENT
787.1 (31.0)
771.7 (30.5)
13.1 (111.0)
lOSbl
75.b (2b70.l)
23.1/ 3/ 231
.b/ 3/ b
SB.i/ 2/ 2111
.!/ 2/ 1
75.I/ 3/ 1.37
3.3/ 3/ .05
3b.1/ 2/ 37
.?/ 2/ ^
8.01
231
280b
1.32
3b.3
10.11
217.01
1833.1
l.bl
1.7b
12.78
317.5
.80
Ib.bb
501
.bl
3bS
512
5.78
.811 ( .815)
1.000 ( .18b)
205.b
11.17
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 35.88
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT .71
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C 115
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C 588
STABILIZED
787.1 (31.0)
771.7 (30.5)
13.3 (110.0)
blbbS
130.0 (1510.0)
18.I/ 3/ 181
.B/ 3/ 8
51.2/ 2/ 2bbO
.3/ 2/ 11
50.I/ 3/ .88
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
10.I/ 2/ 11
.I/ 2/ 1
11.53
182
2575
.83
10.1
i3.be
381.bS
1185.1
2.20
2.20
b2.B1
320.1
.3b
18.11
8b8
.11
1b7
588
b.20
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTI
HYDROCARBONS (
CARBON MONOXIDE
3
HOT TRANSIENT
787.1 (31.0)
771.7 (30.5)
11.1 (112.0)
10b2b
75. b (2b71.b)
22. S/ 2/ 23
b.l/ 2/ b
11.b/13/ 1b
b.2/13/ b
7b.1/ 3/ 1.10
3.3/ 3/ .05
85. 1/ 3/ 2Sb
.b/ 3/ 2
1.53
17
87
1.35
251. b
.71
7.b8
1870.2
32.35
.13
1.31
32b.7
S.bS
11.05
SOb
1.51
111
Sib
5.72
.115 (
1.000 (
IDE G/KM
PTION L/100KM
S (THC) G/KM
XIDE G/KM
ITROGEN G/KM
1
STABILIZED
787.1 (31.0)
771.7 (30.5)
13.1 (111.0)
b1700
121.1 (1588.2)
7.B/ 2/ B
S.b/ 2/ b
12.1/13/ 12
1.3/13/ 1
55. 5/ 3/ .17
3. I/ 3/ .05
13. S/ 3/ 130
.B/ 3/ 2
13.73
3
8
.13
128.3
.20
1.21
2202.5
27.11
.03
.20
357.1
1.55
15.29
8b7
1.15
181
SOS
b.15
.111)
.185)
205. 5
11.88
3-BAG (1-BAG)
321.5 ( 332. fa)
lb.71 ( 15.88)
1.51 ( .10)
11.87 ( 23.30)
1.10 ( 3.11)
-------
ouu TABLE B-19. TEST NO. 51KH-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 51K FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - 013.FCA + NO AIR
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
00
NJ
TEST NO. 51KH-1 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL ?9 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN ?*3* KG( S3bS IBS)
BAROMETER 7*3. *b MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 2* PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIP P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HSOCIN. Hao)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STO. cu. METRESOCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC
co
co
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOx MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
Co GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC» HET (DRY)
SCFr MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER S1KH-1
BAROMETER MM HG 7*3.5
HUMIDITY G/KG 4.8
TEMPERATURE DEC C ZS.O
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 2/28/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY *.8 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 20*1 KG( *soo LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.S KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3**
ODOMETER 1103 KM( 872 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .8*
COLD TRANSIENT
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
*0*71
7b.3 (2b9*.b)
33.S/ 3/ 335
1.7/ 3/ 17
78.I/ 2/ **S1
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (2S.O)
»1.1 (lOb.O)
132.0 (*bb2.1)
21. 2/ 3/ 212
1.5/ 3/
15
b2.7/ 2/ 32*0
.!/ 2/
73. 9/ 3/ 1
3.2/ 3/
28. O/ 2/
2.0/ 2/
7.*1
320
*
.3*
,05
28
2
1.30
381.85
1818.4
3.21
bb.10
31*. B
.5b
18.20
.2/ 2/
H.2/ 3/
3.S/ 3/
7.9/ 2/
1.5/ 2/
11.27
198
3155
.80
b.S
15.10
485.00
19*0.7
1.38
78.91
315.8
.22
19.10
B
.85
.05
a
2
502 8b8
.b? 0.00
352
508 *99
5.78 b.15
.89* ( .893)
1.000 ( .981)
208.3
11.12
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
43.3 (110.0)
*OblO
7b.S (2703. b)
2b.f/ 3/ 2b*
1.3/ 3/ 13
7*.*/ 2/ *1*0
.3/ 2/ 11
fa7.*/ 3/ 1.21
3. I/ 3/ .05
24. l/ 2/ 24
1.2/ 2/ 1
8.18
£53
4002
1.17
23.0
11.15
35b.71
Ib39.8
2.82
1.9*
bl.99
285.0
.*1
lb.58
SOS
.77
*33
S38
5.75
7b2.0 (30.0)
73b.b (29.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
b9b39
131.3 (*b3b.O)
20, 8/ 3/ 208
I.*/ 3/ 14
bb.8/ 2/ 35*2
.3/ 2/ 11
48. 3/ 3/ .83
3.3/ 3/ .05
9.2/ 2/ 9
1.2/ 2/ 1
11. Ib
195
3**7
. 79
8.1
1*.78
52b.9Q
1895.2
1.70
2.40
85. b3
308.0
.28
19.28
Bb7
1.05
*5S
508
b.15
.898 ( .897)
1.000 ( .990)
207.8
11.91
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 39.05
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT .27
CATALYST AVG. TEMp. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC C 538
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS . .
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
307.1
18.22
2.91
71.58
.37
(*-BAG)
( 30*. 8)
( 18.25)
( 2.29)
( 73. 5b)
( .38)
-------
TABLE B-20. TEST NO, 51KH-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - siK FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - ois. FCA + NO AIR
PROJECT 11-5402-001
TEST NO. S1KH-2 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 74 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE s.7 LOSI cio V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN 2434 KG( 53faS LBS)
BAROMETER 7*0.41 MM HG(2i.is IN HGJ
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 41 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HZOUN. HPO)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
, DILUTION FACTOR
' HC CONCENTRATION PPM
1 CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCr MET (DRY)
3CF, NET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER SlKH-2
BAROMETER MM HG 7*0.1
HUMIDITY G/KG i.a
TEMPERATURE DEC C 2b.7
VEHICLE NO. SI
DATE 3/2b/7«»
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 2b.7 OEG C(80.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 1.2 GN/KG
TEST WEIGHT 20*1 KG( 4500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.1 KH( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EH-311
ODOMETER 1730 KM( 1075 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR ,ss
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
787. 4 (31. 0)
7b2.0 (90.0)
44.4 (112.0)
40b30
75.8 (2b7B.O)
31. 0/ 3/ 310
1.2/ 3/ 12
75. I/ 2/ 4118
.ex a/ a
70. 7/ 3/ 1.28
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
35. OX 3X 25
1.3X 2/ 1
7.82
300
4032
1.23
23.1
13.10
3Sb.OO
1708.4
3.30
2.25
bl.lb
213.5
.57
lb.S3
504
.75
352
512
5.83
.818
1.000
2
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
44.4 (112.0)
b1704
130.1 (4513.8)
21. 3X 3X 213
l.S/ 3X 15
b3.7X 2X 3312
.SX 2X 11
47. IX 3X .81
3.7X 3X .Ob
1.SX 2X 10
1.1X 2X 1
11. bl
191
3111
.7b
8.5
14.15
484.57
1801.4
2.02
2.40
77.10
210.1
.32
17.17
8bB
.»5
453
411
b.aa
( .812)
( .184)
205. <»
12.04
HOT TRANSIENT
787.4 (31.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
43.1 (111.0)
40552
75.7 (2b75.1)
27. 7X 3X 277
1.4X 3/ 14
71. 3X 2X 3810
,bX ax 23
bl.5/ 3/ 1.25
4. I/ 3X .Ob
2b.SX ax 2b
i.2x ax i
8.01
3724
1.20
25.4
ll.Sfa
328. 4b
Ibb2.8
3.52
1.11
Sb.Sl
28b.l
.bO
lb.27
SOS
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
43.1 (111.0)
blbbl
130.1 (4515.3)
22.ax sx eaa
l.b/ 3/ Ib
bb.sx ax 3S4a
,b/ ax 23
48.a/ 3X .83
4.OX 3X .Ob
is.ax ax 13
1.2X 2X 1
11.18
207
3417
.78
12.1
15.57
517.72
18S0.4
2.87
2.50
83.04
aib.a
.4b
18.57
8b?
544
S.81
512
b.23
.818 ( .812)
1.000 ( .184)
205.8
12.05
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MGXKM 37.04
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG c
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG C 544
CARBON DIOXIDE GXKM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/iOOKM
HYDROCARBONS (THO G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
3-BAG
210.1
17.28
bS.'sa
.45
(4-BAG)
( an.8)
( 17.4b)
( 2.ai)
( 70.05)
( .41)
-------
APPENDIX C
SUMMARIES OF VEHICLE TESTING RESULTS
-------
TABLE C-l. CAR 511 - DISABLED 02 SENSOR
1979 Mercury Marquis - Three-Way Catalyst
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
O
to
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
'. r °C
'., °C
g/km
100 km
FTP
511-11
740.2
11.1
25.6
33.02
3.59
—
—
358.5
15.41
SET
511-12
739.9
9.7
27.2
25.79
3.45
—
—
281.6
12.04
HFET
511-13
739.9
9.2
26.7
22.18
2.96
—
—
242.4
10.35
FTP
511-21
737.6
10.2
24.4
32.59
3.84
—
—
354.7
15.21
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
511-22
738.1
10.2
24.4
24.38
3.86
—
—
266.0
11.38
HFET
511-23
738.9
9.2
28.3
20.75
1.31
—
—
226.7
9.68
FTP
511-31
742.7
10.6
25.0
33.79
3.61
562
661
367.3
15.77
SET
511-32
742.7
11.4
26.7
25.49
3.92
617
715
278.2
11.89
HFET
511-33
742.7
10.6
26.7
21.23
1.38
606
636
232.0
9.91
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons.,
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC) , g/km 0.12 0.03 0.01
Carbon Monoxide, g/km 1.35 0.20 0.01
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km 0.85 0.76 0.79
Particulates
Total Particulates 4.35 13.66 48.45
Sulfate 0.22 8.16 40.82
Sulfate as % of TFS, % Q.22 10.55 61.35
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia 2.24 1.19 0.76
Cyanide & Cyanogen 0.00 —
DMNA
0.09
0.82
2.42
3.04
0.15
0.15
0.04
0.24
2.52
2.02
0.54
0.74
0.01
0.06
1.30
1.08
0.22
0.35
0.12
1.10
2.60
8.63
2.45
2.42
4.12
0.13
2.86
5.78
2.65
0.04
0.22
2.88
6.23
3.68
4.81
0.01
0.04
1.25
18.77
10.15
15.94
0.6
65.3
0.14
0.00
0.8
22.2
0.05
0.00
0.2
9.6
0.01
0.00
0.4
56.7
0.15
0.00
0.2
24.8
0.10
0.00
0.2
1.6
0.02
0.00
0.3
72.4
1.07
0.00
0.1
29.1
0.46
0.00
0.0
10.9
1.6
0.00
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.00
0.00
21.45
0.00
0.00
8.38
0.00
0.00
4.92
0.00
0.00
10.66
0.14
0.00
7.47
0.00
0.00
4.43
0.00
0.00
10.42
0.10
0.00
8.46
0.00
0.00
4.04
-------
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.) CAR 511 - DISABLED 02 SENSOR
1979 Mercury Marquis - Three-Way Catalyst
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
n Methane
i Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
511-11
0.29
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.6
0.5
41.97
3.99
4.46
1.84
0.37
2.05
4.06
6.52
65.3
54.4
0.09
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
511-12
0.24
0.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.8
2.7
19.90
0.42
1.65
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.22
0.00
22.2
74.0
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
511-13
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.2
2.0
8.91
0.00
0.67
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.6
96.0
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
511-21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.26
0.00
0.4
0.4
41.97
3.21
1.85
1.30
0.54
1.55
2.20
4.07
56.7
63.0
0.04
0.01
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
511-22
0.05
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.2
0.5
21.48
1.08
0.66
0.00
0.03
0.28
0.69
0.53
24.8
62.0
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
511-23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.2
2.0
10.40
0.00
0.77
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.20
0.20
11.6
116.0
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
511-31
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.3
53.36
4.72
2.07
1.83
0.18
1.88
2.64
5.67
72.4
60.3
0.30
0.27
0.32
0.18
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
SET
511-32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.1
0.3
25.93
1.08
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.42
0.53
29.1
72.8
0.21
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
511-33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
9.77
0.08
0.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.00
10.9
109.0
0.52
0.50
0.10
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
o
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.) CAR 511 - DISABLED 02 SENSOR
1979 Mercury Marquis - Three-Way Catalyst
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
511-11 511-12 511-13
511-21 511-22 511-23
FTP
SET
HFET
511-31 511-32 511-33
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.13 0.00 Q.09 0.00
0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.09 4.75 9.39 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.06
0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.67 0.41 0.02 0.24
0.04 0.06 0.00 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.09
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
Note: Most values of 0.00 for Other Elements have been left blank.
-------
TABLE C-2. CAR 512 - TWELVE PERCENT MISFIRE AND AIR TO BYPASS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons.,
UNMODIFIED
PVM-ST
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
., °c
., °c
g/km
100 km
FTP
512-11
744.7
8.7
24.4
33.37
4.72
491
572
361.7
15.57
SET
512-12
744.2
10.6
26.7
25.38
3.96
564
610
276.7
11.84
HFET
512-13
744.7
11.8
27.2
22.54
3.39
594
618
246.3
10.52
FTP
512-21
744.2
11.8
23.9
35.54
0.98
622
726
368.9
16.58
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
512-22
744.2
10.8
24.4
25.76
0.63
728
787
276.4
12.02
HFET
512-23
744.2
11.1
23.9
23.00
0.29
778
791
249.7
10.73
FTP
512-31
743.5
11.3
23.3
34.84
0.95
610
730
361.7
16.26
SET
512-32
743.5
13.4
25.6
24.86
0.53
721
781
265.6
11.60
HFET
512-33
743.5
11.8
25.6
22.86
0.30
769
788
248.0
10.67
o
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
0.14
1.67
0.92
1.69
1.69
0.03
0.43
0.85
13.56
17.81
0.01
0.03
0.95
0.00
0.00
1.82
8.86
0.61
10.73
0.11
0.10
0.32
2.67
0.46
4.45
0.07
0.09
0.09
0.94
0.47
1.76
0.07
0.10
1.63
8.95
0.59
9.28
0.15
0.14
0.38
3.18
0.42
3.05
0.05
0.07
0.10
1.06
0.36
0.02
0.06
0.09
6.4
75.2
—
0.01
4.1
26.1
—
0.01
2.3
8.6
—
0.00
0.9
324.9
0.12
0.02
0.3
93.1
0.04
0.02
2.3
29.2
0.04
0.02
2.8
320.9
0.24
0.06
0.8
94.6
0.04
0.00
0.2
29.5
0.07
0.02
3.41
0.00
22.16
1.85
39.70
1.29
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
0.00
0.00
29.65
0.00
0.00
13.81
0.00
0.00
5.73
0.71
0.00
14.09
0.57
0.00
4.91
0.11
0.00
2.57
0.46
0.00
9.77
0.45
0.00
4.68
0.14
0.00
2.30
-------
TABLE C-2 (Cont'd). CAR 512 - TWELVE PERCENT MISFIRE AND AIR TO BYPASS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
O Individual Hydrocarbons
^ Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
512-11
6.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.4
4.6
53.69
4.08
5.20
1.40
0.30
1.57
4.65
4.33
75.2
53.7
_—
—
—
— —
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
512-12
4.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.1
13.7
22.85
0.60
2.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.06
26.1
87.0
^ ^
—
—
—
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
512-13
2.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.3
23.0
7.92
0.00
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.6
86.0
__
—
—
— —
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
512-21
0.53
0.15
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.9
0.1
42.73
19.46
5.18
2.11
2.09
12.32
120.51
120.48
324.9
17.9
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
512-22
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.1
12.92
6.36
2.23
0.00
0.77
6.14
49.01
15.65
93.1
29.1
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
512-23
0.34
0.25
0.00
1.67
0.00
0.00
2.3
2.6
4.01
3.49
1.11
0.00
0.23
3.82
12.63
3.88
29.2
32.4
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
512-31
1.29
1.16
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.00
2.8
0.2
44.73
17.19
5.29
2.82
0.22
10.66
130.34
109.63
320.9
19.7
0.13
0.07
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
512-32
0.19
0.40
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.8
0.2
14.48
6.24
2.44
0.00
0.49
5.85
48.88
16.23
94.6
24.9
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
512-33
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.2
0.2
4.41
3.33
1.27
0.00
0.17
3.50
15.13
1.69
29.5
29.5
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-2 (Cont'd). CAR 512 - TWELVE PERCENT MISFIRE AND AIR TO BYPASS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number,
Other Elements
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
PVM-ST
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
FTP
512-11
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.00
0.00
1.22
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.01
0.00
SET
512-12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.53
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
HFET
512-13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
512-21
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.01
2.82
0.01
0.00
0.53
0.02
0.01
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
512-22
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
2.19
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.01
0.00
HFET
512-23
0,20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
2.42
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.00
FTP
512-31
0.32
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.00
1.70
0.01
0.03
0.46
0.02
0.00
SET
512-32
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
1.37
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.01
0.00
HFET
512-33
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
Note: Most values of 0.00 for Other Elements have been left blank.
-------
TABLE C-3. CAR 513 - DISABLED EGR AND AIR
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp
Catalyst Max. Temp
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
T
• i <~
°C
. / u
g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/ 100 km
i
03
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC)
Carbon Monoxide ,
Oxides of Nitrogen
, 9/km
g/km
, g/km
FTP
513-11
738.9
10.2
24.4
34.42
373.2
16.06
0.11
1.73
0.79
SET
513-12
738.9
9.0
25.6
25.81
_ _—
281.3
12.04
0.03
0.48
0.72
HFET
513-13
738.1
9.1
25.6
22.69
___
247.8
10.59
0.01
0.11
0.78
FTP
513-21
739.9
10.9
24.4
37.02
0.43
401
466
338.6
17.27
1.59
38.84
0.46
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
513-22
739.9
8.8
24.4
26.78
0.21
492
542
257.5
12.50
0.80
20.84
0.30
HFET
513-23
739.9
8.2
24.4
24.68
0.20
642
652
267.8
11.52
0.10
1.10
0.75
FTP
513-31
742.2
11.6
24.4
36.34
0.71
399
466
342.6
16.96
1.38
32.05
0.64
SET
513-32
742.2
10.1
24.4
26.66
0.51
540
639
287.9
12.44
0.10
2.06
1.20
HFET
513-33
745.2
10.3
25.6
23.72
0.29
619
636
258.5
11.07
0.06
0.42
1.19
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia 8.51
Cyanide & Cyanogen 0.74
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide 0.00
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide 21.51
4.67
0.72
0.70
0.0
60.7
0.31
0.00
18.23
11.52
14.88
0.9
26.3
0.01
0.01
42.84
26.80
39.37
0.6
7.4
0.06
0.02
9.22
0.18
0.16
1.7
587.9
0.14
0.08
6.45
0.11
0.14
0.1
340.0
0.04
0.03
3.61
0.17
0.23
1.0
35.4
0.05
0.00
2.38
0.16
0.15
4.1
385.2
0.11
0.02
5.04
0.15
0.19
1.2
51.1
0.02
0.00
0.60
0.11
0.15
0.7
19.3
0.02
0.01
0.00 0.00
11.05 6.11
174.67
125.01
0.54
0.00
80.35
1.04
0.00
48.81
0.55
0.00
5.41
170.09
14.87
0.15
0.00
95.40
0.38
0.00
25.86
0.25
0.00
9.80
-------
TABLE C-3 (CONT'D). CAR 513 - DISABLED EGR AND AIR
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM {Except as Noted)
n
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
513-11
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
37.87
5.07
4.73
1.24
0.70
2.17
5.09
3.79
60.7
55.2
0.23
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
513-12
0.64
0.18
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.9
3.0
21.41
0.73
1.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.93
0.40
26.3
87.7
Q.OO
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
513-13
0.46
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.6
6.0
6.70
0.01
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.05
7.4
74.0
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
513-21
0.62
0.82
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.7
0.1
117.55
162.16
20.61
3.62
0.00
70.34
95.26
118.40
587.9
37.0
0.07
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
513-22
0.40
0.31
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.9
0.1
69.61
78.79
14.29
0.00
1.01
37.39
68.40
70.52
340.0
42.5
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
513-23
0.48
0.15
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.0
1.0
9.83
3.60
2.78
0.00
0.00
2.85
11.05
5.28
35.4
35.4
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
513-31
1.91
0.00
0.00
2.19
0.00
0.00
4.1
0.3
88.05
92.86
13.84
2.67
0.88
37.49
60.70
88.67
385.2
27.9
0.05
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
SET
513-32
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.00
0.00
1.2
1.2
21.87
3.77
3.44
0.00
0.54
2.11
14.17
5.16
51.1
51.1
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
513-33
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.7
1.2
6.92
1.61
1.60
0,00
0.00
1.32
5.06
2.83
19.3
32.2
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
TABLE C-3 (Cont'd). CAR 513 - DISABLED EGR AND AIR
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
UNMODIFIED
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
FTP
SET
HFET
513-11 513-12 513-13
513-21 513-22 513-23
513-31 513-32 513-33
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.00
.00
.00
.01
.06
.00
.01
.00
.18
.01
.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.
0.
0.
0.
10.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
00
00
00
00
93
00
00
00
00
01
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.09
.00
.00
.01
.07
.00
.02
.00
.13
.01
.04
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.22
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
00
00
00
00
11
00
01
00
02
00
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.11
.00
.01
.03
.98
.00
.02
.03
.93
.02
.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.65
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
3.98
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.38
0.02
0.01
Note: Most values of 0.00 for Other Elements have been left blank.
-------
TABLE C-4 . CAR 514 - DISCONNECTED CTS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
UNMODIFIED
Test Number, PVM-ST
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature ,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.
Catalyst Max. Temp.
Carbon Dioxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
mg/km
%
, °C
, °c
g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC)
Carbon Monoxide ,
i Oxides of Nitrogen,
t— '
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS
, 9/krn
g/km
g/km
%
FTP
514-11
735.1
11.7
24.4
34.26
3.69
475
563
371.3
15.99
0.14
1.77
0.76
1.35
0.76
0.74
SET
514-12
735.1
11.0
26.1
24.33
3.69
543
606
265.4
11.35
0.03
0.29
0.73
23.39
16.21
22.21
HFET
514-13
735
10
26
21
2
591
627
.1
.0
.7
.89
.93
239.2
10.21
0.01
0.03
0.
53.
40.
62.
79
71
93
33
FTP
514-21
746.3
8.8
21.1
39.61
0.43
436
529
341.3
18.48
1.83
54.67
0.34
8.02
0.21
0.18
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sul fides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sul fide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
3.3
75.2
0.17
0.00
6.05
0.48
0.00
0.00
23.85
2.2
22.9
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.34
1.
10.
0.
0.
—
—
— —
0.
0.
5.
7
4
05
00
-
-
—
00
00
27
2.7
724.2
0.34
0.01
237.15
79.42
— — —
0.93
0.00
41.36
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
514-22
746.3
8.1
22.8
27.89
0.25
519
597
244.1
13.01
1.04
36.62
0.26
3.74
0.12
0.14
0.9
456.4
0.07
0.02
___
1.63
0.00
14.20
HFET
514-23
746.3
7.3
23.3
25.64
0.08
573
614
226.1
11.96
0.86
32.73
0.21
3.25
0.07
0.09
0.0
383.9
0.18
0.00
_ _ -_
2.34
0.00
8.61
FTP
514-31
745.0
10.1
24.4
39.61
0.12
525
348.6
18.48
1.76
50.14
0.39
14.65
0.20
0.17
719.6
— — —
0.03
268.79
145.15
0.99
0.00
44.02
SET
514-32
746.3
7.7
23.9
27.84
0.19
522
601
245.3
12.99
1.06
35.49
0.26
7.23
0.09
0.11
On
. Z
470.0
0.23
0.00
~^
__ —
2.37
0.00
20.04
HFET
514-33
746.3
8.7
24.4
25.66
0.08
583
618
227.4
11.97
0.84
32.08
0.21
1.89
0.05
0.06
1 Q
J. . y
382.5
Oo n
.21
0.04
___
4.02
0.00
9.14
-------
TABLE C-4 (CONT'D) . CAR 514 - DISCONNECTED CTS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
n
M
to
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
UNMODIFIED
FTP
514-11
2.91
0.11
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
3.3
2.4
48.72
5.60
4.11
1.84
1.14
1.80
4.80
7.15
75.2
53.7
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
514-12
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
2.2
7.3
19.84
0.55
1.51
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.59
0.29
22.9
76.3
0.05
0.07
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
514-13
1.55
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
1.7
17.0
9.53
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.4
104.0
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
514-21
0.16
1.18
1.16
0.00
0.17
0.00
2.7
0.1
137.70
187.24
17.90
3.20
2.02
75.66
103.77
196.68
724.2
39.6
0.11
0.06
0.14
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WITH MALFUN
SET
514-22
0.00
0.48
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.9
0.1
82.60
109.07
12.02
0.00
1.20
50.77
79.12
121.64
456.4
43.9
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
514-23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
70.05
92.37
11.26
0.00
1.03
47.36
70.43
91.39
383.9
44.6
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CTION CONDITION
FTP
514-31
0.28
1.16
1.03
0.00
0.00
141.79
183.89
19.99
3.34
3.10
76.38
105.60
185.55
719.6
40.9
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
514-32
0.02
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.2
0.0
85.78
114.17
13.28
0.00
1.28
53.59
79.54
122.40
470.0
44.3
0.13
0.07
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
514-33
0.03
0.00
0.00
1.89
0.00
0.00
1.9
0.2
74.20
94.68
12.28
0.00
1.07
47.31
67.29
85.70
382.5
45.5
0.10
0.07
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE C-4 (Cont'd). CAR 514 - DISCONNECTED CTS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS - THREE-WAY CATALYST
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
O
!-•
U>
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
Chromium Cr
Lead Pb
Manganese Mn
Arsenic As
Mercury Hg
Bromine Br
Phosphorus P
Silicon Si
Cadmium Cd
Aluminum Al
Sulfur S
Sodium Na
Fluorine F
Magnesium Mg
Potassium K
Chlorine Cl
Platinum Pt
Zinc Zn
Copper Cu
Nickel Ni
Iron Fe
Vanadium V
Titanium Ti
Barium Ba
Calcium Ca
UNMODIFIED
FTP
514-11
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.14
0.02
0.01
SET
514-12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
HFET
514-13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.48
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
FTP
514-21
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.27
0.02
0.02
WITH MALFUNCTION CONDITION
SET
514-22
0.15
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.01
HFET
514-23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.00
FTP
514-31
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.23
0.03
0.00
SET
514-32
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.01
HFET
514-33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Note: Most values of 0.00 for Other Elements have been left blank.
-------
APPENDIX D
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
-------
TABLE D-l. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series 511 - Disabled C>2 Sensor
Ewxissions in tng,/'km
Total Part iculate
Sulfates
Anmonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
IsobutyraIdehyde
Methyl ethyl keteme
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl diRulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethy1ami ne s d i me thy1ami ne
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
P ropan e
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
Unmodified
COLD-UDDS
ft. f>8
0.21
1.84
0.00
0.00
0. 15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
COLD-UDDS
1 2
5.98 2.67
2.04 0.02
0.57 0.?8
1.24 0.00
0.16 0.03
1.00 0.00
1.83 0.14
3.99 0.07
0.97 0.34
0.00 0.00
511-11
HOT-ODDS
2.61
0.23
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3 4
1.47 2.65
0.37 0.00
0.63 0.29
0 . 00 0 . 00
0.00 0.00
0.21 0.00
0.49 0.01
0.25 0.00
1.20 0.41
0.00 0.00
511-21
COLD-UDDS
5.60
0.10
4.52
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.17
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
1 2
5.94 2.84
1.72 0.08
0.49 0.06
0.88 0.00
0.14 0.05
0.91 0.00
1.34 0.00
2.56 0.00
1.00 0.13
0.00 0.00
Malfunction
HOT -ODDS
1.10
0.19
3.82
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.17
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3 4
4.06 2.23
0.10 0.00
0.29 0.02
0 . 00 0 . 00
0.05 0.00
0.05 0.00
0.10 0.00
0.10 0.00
0.34 0.09
0.00 0.00
COLD-UDDS
9.04
0.58
3.35
—
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.35
0.53
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
COLD-UDDS
1
7.21 3.
2.37 0.
0.65 0.
1.21 0.
c
2
52
01
00
00
0.11 0.00
1.16 0.
1.75 0.
3.41 0.
0.90 0.
0.00 0.
00
00
00
11
00
HOT-ODDS
8.32
3.86
2.13
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.21
0.16
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3 "4
5.68
0.42
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.24
0.37
0.00
2.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
-------
TABLE D-2. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series 512 - Twelve Percent. Misfire and Air to Bypass
Emissions in mg/km
o
Total Participate
Sulfates
Amnonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Honoethylamine & ditnethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Mr thane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acotylene
propane
Propylene
Benzene
To1uene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
Unmodified
512-11
6
1
0
0
0
n
2
2
1
0
COLD-UDDS
7.66
0.90
2.93
0.00
0.00
6.53
O.OO
0.00
O.OO
0.00
O.OO
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.83 4.22
.98 O.O9
.64 0.40
.96 0 . 00
.01 0.00
.94 0.01
.05 0.05
.99 0.00
.55 0.45
.00 o . oo
HOT-UDDS
4.61
2.28
3.78
0.00
0.00
6.35
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3 4
4.54 3.55
0.38 0.00
0.69 0.35
0.00 O.OO
0.01 0.07
0.03 0.00
0.34 0.00
0 . 08 0 . 00
1.62 0.53
O.OO 0.00
512-21
COLD-UDDS
18.94
0.21
7.55
2.30
0.90
0.79
0.16
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDE
1 2
8.97 2.05
6.97 0.60
1.11 0.27
1.46 O.OO
0.48 0.23
3.97 0.43
24.21 10.84
49.10 3.48
1.61 0.14
0.00 0.00
Malfunction
512-31
HOT-UDDS
4.53
O.O4
33.18
1.51
0.56
0.34
0.15
0.00
0.24
0.00
O.OO
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
O.OO
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3 4
4.57 1.69
2,32 0.65
0.73 0.24
O.OO 0.00
0.20 0.06
1.54 0.52
14.04 9.79
15.20 3.30
0.40 0.11
0.00 0.00
COLD-UDDS
12.52
0.22
15.32
0.87
0.43
1.93
1.30
0.00
0.21
O.OO
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
COLD-UDDS
1 2
7.20 2.36
4.96 0.63
0.78 0.32
1.89 O.OO
0.06 0.01
2.39 0.48
16. 3» 10.16
35.31 4.33
0.95 0.15
0.00 0.00
HOT-UDDS
6.83
0.09
58.10
1.60
0.49
0.80
1.06
0.00
0.46
O.OO
0-00
0.19
0.10
0.00
0.01
0.05
O.01
0.00
O.OO
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3
5.22 2
2.51 0
0.83 0
0.02 0
0.06 0
1.81 0,
23.78 10
16.68 3.
0.26 0.
0.00 0.
4
.15
.66
.29
.00
.00
.48
.55
.82
.09
.00
-------
TABLE D-3. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series 513 - Disabled EGR and Air
Emissions in mq/km
O
Total Particulate
Sul fates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldchyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehydc
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine &
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Other
Nitrous Oxide
Nickel Carbonyl
dimethylamine
Unmodified
513-11
COLD-UDDS
6
0
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.63
.93
.46
.46
.00
.00
.00
.09
.00
.00
.00
.50
.14
.03
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
COLD-UDDS
1
6.45
2.16
0.64
0.85
0,16
1.11
1.91
3.18
1.51
2
3.93
0.12
0.35
0.00
0.11
0.01
0.20
0.17
0.41
HOT-UDDS
3.20
0.56
7.79
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
o.oo
o.oo
o.oo
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3
4.15
0.46
0.58
0.01
0.03
0.18
0.59
O.33
1.29
4
3.53
0.10
0.32
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.18
O.05
O.05
513-21
COLD-UDDS
11.41
0.29
129.64
139.03
O.65
0.90
0.14
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.09
O.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
1
14.02
21.42
2.53
1.86
0.00
9.65
14.31
3.41
4.46
O.OO
2
9.66
16.49
1.51
0.24
0.00
6.96
9.J1
15.46
1.88
O.OO
Malfunction
HOT-UDDS
7.
0.
208.
114.
O.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
57
09
64
44
46
40
33
26
00
00
00
08
02
513-31
COLD-UDDS
o.oo
O.
0.
0.
0.
00
05
08
00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3
10.91
15.94
2.74
0.08
0.00
6.69
10.42
14.27
3.76
O.OO
4
8.01
13.76
1.47
0.04
0.00
6.11
9.02
13.48
1.38
O.OO
0.58
0.18
196.09
18.56
0.34
0.37
0.00
0.00
4.25
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
COLD-UDDS
1
13.07
18.90
2.29
1.79
0.23
8.02
12.91
19.36
5.38
O.OO
2
8.21
14.15
1.36
0.00
0.08
5.87
8.77
14.38
2.80
O.OO
HOT-UDDS
3.73
0.15
150.48
12.08
O.OO
3.07
0.00
0.00
0.63
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
O.OO
O.OO
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
HOT-L'DDK
3
8.16
10.71
1.95
0.00
0.10
4.00
6.44
10.07
4.56
O.OO
4
3.83
0.32
0.38
0.00
0.01
0.03
1.94
0.75
1.09
0.00
-------
TABLE D-4. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
Test Series 514 - Disconnected CTS
Emissions in mg/km
D
Total Particulate
Sulfates
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s, Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldenyde
• Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine f, dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
I nd i v t dual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Nitrous Oxid"
Nickel Carbonyl
Unmodified
514-11
COLD-UDDS
3.14
0.52
8.62
0.90
0.00
3.80
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
COLO-UDDS
6
2
0
1
0
1
2
4
1
0
1
.67
.82
.65
.24
.16
.20
.49
.28
.52
.00
2
3.00
0.1O
0.23
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.37
0.00
HOT-UDDS
0.00
0.94
4.11
0.17
0.00
2.23
0.20
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.07
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3
4.16
0.42
0.56
0.00
0.10
0.06
0.39
0.31
1.06
0.00
4
3.28
o.oo
0.24
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.42
O.OO
Malfunction
514-21
COLD-UDDS
6.31
0.28
192.44
80.93
0.59
0.37
1.29
1.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
0.33
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions! in ppm
COLD-UDDS
1 2
15.04 9.82
21.95 16.72
2.30 1.18
2.00 0.10
0.28 0.12
9.11 6.63
14.13 9.52
26.64 18.70
3.14 0.64
0.00 O.OO
HOT-UDDS
9
0
270
78
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
.31
.15
.RB
.28
.18
.00
.09
.23
.00
.29
.00
514-31
COLD-UDDS
20
0
253
172
0
0
O
0
.10
.31
.41
.30
.68
.42
.74
.33
HOT-UDDS
10.53
0.11
280.40
124.66
1.23
0.18
1.47
1.55
O.OO
0
0
.00
.00
0.19
0.11
0.00
O.OO
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.
0.
00
00
HOT-UDDS
3
12.89
20.57
2.51
0.00
0.24
8.53
13.27
22.03
1.67
0.00
4
10.36
17.11
1.17
0.00
0.18
6.78
9.52
18.86
0.67
0.00
0.
.05
0.00
0.
0.
00
00
0.00
COLD-UDDS
1
17.74
24.79
2.67
1.13
0.39
10.09
15.81
26.91
3.21
0.00
2
10.62
16.24
1.39
0.38
0.28
6.67
8.94
17.90
0.79
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.03
0.00
O.OO
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3 4
13.59 9.
19. 8O 15.
2.78 1.
0.17 0.
0.27 0.
B.17 6-
13.03 9.
19.06 17.
1.94 0.
77
54
23
10
26
62
76
57
57
0,00 0.00
-------
APPENDIX E
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE REGULATED EMISSIONS TESTS RESULTS
-------
PVM -
TEST NO. sii-ii RUN i
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(35i CIO) v-e
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH ?H3» KGf 53b5 LBS)
BAROMETER 7*0.Ib MM HG(a9.1H IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53 PCT
B«G RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. HaOUN. H30)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?O(!N. H?o>
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW SfD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/ppM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
Coa SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
W HC CONCENTRATION PPM
M co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
Co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 511-11
BAROMETER MM HG 740.S
HUMIDITY G/KG 11.1
TEMPERATURE DEG c as.b
PROJECT 11-5*03-001
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE <»/?0/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. a
DRY BULB TEMP, as.b DEG C(7B.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.1 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT eo*i KG( >»5oo LBS)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD H.9 KW( ia.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3»»
ODOMETER 3Sa» KM( ?190 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOS 1.01
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
787. t (31.0)
77*. 7 (30.5)
*3.3 (11(1.0)
*0bb5
75.9 (ab80.7)
si. b/ a/ sa
10. 3/ a/ 10
b9.7/n/ as?
1.5/11/ 5
87. O/ 3/ l.ba
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
58. D/ a/ 58
i.?/ ?/ a
B.13
*3
378
1.57
5b.S
l.Rb
a».bi
3178.1
8.3?
.33
H.at
375. H
1.H3
lb.35
505
3.55
787. H (31.0)
77*. 7 (30.5)
*3.3 (110.0)
b9879
130.* (HbOS.8)
i*.a/ a/ i*
9.9/ a/ 10
aa.s/is/ 3i
3. a/13/ 3
Sb.O/ 3/ .98
3.0/ 3/ .05
is. s/ a/ ib
i.s/ a/ a
13.57
s
18
.H*
1*.*
.38
a. 70
aa*e.a
3.b5
.Ob
.**
3b3.1
.59
15.53
870
3.bl
787.* (31.0)
77*. 7 (30.5)
*3.3 (110. U)
*ossa
75.7 (ab73.0)
17. b/ Z/ 18
9. I/ a/ 9
b5.9/13/ b*
a.8/13/ 3
79. 3/ 3/ l.*b
3.*/ 3/ .05
3b.b/ a/ 37
.9/ a/ 1
9.1b
9
59
l.*l
35.8
.*!
5.17
1953.5
S.ab
.07
.89
337.3
.91
1*.*7
505
3.5*
787.* (31.0)
77*. 7 (30.5)
*3.3 (110.0)
b9b*3
130.0 (*590.0)
13. 9/ a/ 13
8.S/ a/ 9
15.7/13/ 15
1. fa/13/ 3
59. I/ 3/ 1.05
3.S/ 3/ .05
17. I/ a/ 17
.?/ a/ i
ia.79
5
13
1.00
lb.5
.38
1.97
33b9.b
*.1S
.Ob
.33
385.8
.be
lb.*9
8b8
3.55
5.80 b.lS
.908 ( .898)
1.000 ( .978)
eob.3
11.99
5.79
b.lH
.910 ( .901)
1.000 ( .978)
aos.b
11.93
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC C
CATALYST MAX. TE^p. DEG C
33.02
3.59
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/lOOKM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3-BAG
358.5
15. "»1
.1?
1.35
.85
(*-BAG)
(
(
(
C
(
3b5.3)
15.b9)
.ia)
1. 36)
.88)
-------
TABLE E-2. TEST NO. 511-12 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - SU 3B1 VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
W
I
00
VEHICLE MODEL '9 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE s.7 LOSI ciD) v-a
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAR CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HG(IN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HPOUN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DFG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS .
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER, PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, OFG C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, MG/KM
4VG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP., OEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. si
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2*3* KG( 53b5 LBS)
si»-ia
SET
1
t/20/79
3553KM( ??08MILES)
3-1-3
, 27.? / 81.0
42.0
731.9 (29.13)
139H
787.H (31.0)
77H.7 (30.5)
»3.3 (110.0)
11278b
210.4 (7432.t>)
13.2/ 2/ 13
9.9/ ?/ 10
22.8/13/ 22
3.b/13/ »
87.O/ 3/ I.b2
3.2/ 3/ .OS
42.9/ 2/ H3
l.O/ 2/ 1
<»
IB
1.57
*2.0
.55
».32
bPSI.b
lb.37
,87<» ( .873)
1.000 ( .978)
210.t
21.5?
511-12
739.9
9.7
27.2
25.79
3.»5
281. b
.03
.20
TEST WEIGHT 20H1 KG( *500 LBS)
ACTUAL RO*D LOAD 8.9 Kw( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-344
511-13
HFET
1
>»/?0/79
3589KM( 2230MILES)
2-1-3
2b.7 / 80.0
HI.3
739.9 (29.13)
7bfa
7B7.t (31.0)
77-*.7 (30.5)
t3.3 (110.0)
b)881
115.5 (*078.3)
11.0/ 2/ 11
10.S/ ?/ 10
t.0/13/ »
2.3/13/ 2
43.»/ 2/ 1.92
l.b/ 2/ .Ob
b2.0/ 2/ b?
1.2/ 2/ 1
2
2
1.87
bl.O
.It
.2H
3952.9
12.B»
.857 ( .851)
1.000 ( .975)
115.5
lb.31
511-13
739.9
9.2
2b.7
22.18
2.9b
10.35
.01
.01
.79
-------
PVM -
TEST NO. sn-21 RUN i
VEHICLE MODEL ?9 MERCURY
ENGINE 5.7 LOSI CID) v-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?434 KG( 53bS LBS)
BAROMETER 737. he MM HG(29.n4 TN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5? PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIP P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?O(TN. H?o)
BLOWER INLET TFMP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STO. cu. METREMSCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD MtfTFR/RANGE/PpM
CO SAMPLK METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD ME1FR/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGHD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
W HC CONCENTRATION PPM
^ CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GHAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. OEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFCf WET (DRY)
SCFr WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 511-21
BAROMETER MM HG 737. b
HUMIDITY G/KG jo.e
TEMPERATURE DEC c ?».•»
PROJECT 11-5402-001
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 4/2b/79
BAG CART No. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. i
LED n? SENSOR
TEST WEIGHT ?o»i KGC »soo LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.1) HP)
GASOLINE EM-344
ODOMETER 4054 KM( aSIR MILES)
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(7b.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.2 GM/KG
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
787. 4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (lin.O)
40773
75.8 (2b77.9)
40. 9/ 2/ 41
8.h/ ?/ q
M.l/11/ 24b
1.3/11/ 4
84. I/ 3/ 1.5S
3.8/ 3/ ,0b
41. 7/ 3/ 125
.b/ 3/ 2
R.47
33
231
1.50
123.5
1 ,4b
20.4?
2087. b
17. b4
.2b
3.58
3b5.7
3.09
15.88
505
3.85
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
7051B
131.2 (4b33.0)
Ilr9/ 2/ 12
8.7/ 2/ 9
5.4/13/ 5
2.8/13/ 3
Sb.B/ 3/ 1.00
4.2/ 3/ .Ob
51. B/ ?/ 52
2.0/ 2/ 2
13.38
4
3
. 94
49. 9
.29
. 39
2258.0
12.34
.05
.Ob
3b5.9
2.00
15. b3
8b?
3.93
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
H3.3 (110.0)
40824
75.9 (2b81.5)
15. O/ 2/ 15
B.5/ 2/ 9
14.b/13/ 14
1.5/13/ 1
7b.4/ 3/ 1.4Q
4.0/ 3/ .Ob
3b.5/ 3/ 1U9
.4/ 3/ 1
9.58
7
12
1.34
108.4
.32
1.07
I8b3.5
15.50
.Ob
.19
325.4
2.71
13.91
SOS
3.5b
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (11U.O)
70710
131.5 (4b4b.D)
11. 3/ 2/ 11
9.0/ 2/ 9
4.0/13/ 4
1.4/13/ 1
58. 3/ 3/ 1.03
4.£/ 3/ .Ob
47. 4/ 2/ 47
1.7/ 2/ 2
13.00
3
3
.97
45.8
.23
.39
233b.O
11. 3b
.04
.Ob
384.0
1.87
lb.40
8b8
3.45
5.71
.909 ( .900)
1.000 ( .979)
207.0
11.88
TOTAL ^UEL SULFUR MG/KM 3?.59
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT 3.84
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC C
b.17
5.73 b.08
.913 ( .904)
1.000 ( .979)
207.5
11.81
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/lOOKM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGtN G/KM
3-BAG
35H.7
15.21
.04
.82
2.42
(4-BAG)
( 3bfl.O)
( 15. »3)
( .09)
( .62)
( 2.38)
-------
TABLE E-1, TEST MO. 511-22 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 511 SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED 02 SENSOR
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MAROUIS
ENGINE s.7 LOSI ciD) v-a
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAG CAKT - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEG. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HG(IN HG)
RUN TIMEr SECONDS
BLOWER OIK P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER IULET P MM. HeociN.
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG
BLOWER REVOLUIIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD M&TER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METFR/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD MEIER/RANSE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
COP MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER* PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEC C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, "G/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP., DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEG C
CARBON DIOXIOE, G/KM
FUtL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
F)
VEHICLE NO. si
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?*3«» KG( 53b5 LB3)
SET
I
H/Zb/79
«K)7bKM( 2533MRES)
? - 1 - 3
S?.0
738.1 (21. Ob)
787.
GASOLINE fc
511-83
HFET
1
»085KM( 8S38MILES)
a - i - 3
28.3 / H3.0
37. »
738.9 (29.09)
7bb
787.* (31.0)
77H.7 (30.5)
»3.3 (llCl.n)
(0111.3)
10. 3/ 2/
7.B/ 2/
9.3/13/
1.1/13/
10
8
9
1
9».5/ 3/ 1.77
».»/ 3/ .07
33. H/ 3/ 100
«f
8
1.71
98. H
.2H
1 .110
3bS3.8
20.89
.8b8 ( .8b3)
1.000 ( .978)
llb.O
lb.12
511-23
739.9
9.2
28.3
20.75
1.31
?2b.7
.HI
.Ob
1.30
-------
TABLE E-5. TEST NO. 511-31 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 511 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED 0? SENSOR
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
TEST NO. 511-31 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL " MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2*3* KG( S3b5 LBS)
BAROMETER 7»2.70 MM HG(?9.2* IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 52 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIP P HM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H2o(iN.
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
T> CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lnOKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DFG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCFr *ET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 511-31
BAROMETER MM HG 7»2.7
HUMIDITy G/KG 10. b
TEMPERATURE DEG c 55. o
F)
VEHICLE NO. si
DATE */30/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. ?
DRY BULB TEMP. .25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
A8S. HUMIDITY 10.b GM/KG
TEST WEIGH! 2UH1 KG( HSOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAU LOAD 8.9 KN( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3H*
ODOMETER *H3 KM( gbSb MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
COLO TRANSIENT
787.* (31.0)
77*. 7 (3U.5)
*3.3 (110.0)
*07*8
7b.3 (2b9b.b)
»8.b/ ?/ *9
8. I/ 2/ B
7b.7/ll/ 3*3
1.3/11/ *
85. S/ 3/ 1.58
3.B/ 3/ .Ob
*5.9/ 3/ 138
.b/ 3/ S
323
1.53
13b.l
1.83
28.72
21*3.3
19.82
.32
5.01
37*. 1
3.fb
lb.35
505
3.99
*71
bbl
5.73
.907 ( .818)
1.000 ( .978)
20b.B
11.83
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 33.79
AVG. EXH. OXyGEN PCT a.bl
CATALyST AVG. TEMP. DEG C Sb2
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C bbl
STABILIZED
7fl7.* (31.0)
77*.7 (30.5)
*3.3 (UO.O)
fa9bb?
130.5 (*b08.9)
12. 8/ 2/ 13
8.2/ 2/ B
3.b/13/ *
2.7/13/ 3
57. 7/ 3/ 1.0?
*.0/ 3/ .Ob
52. 3/ ?/ 52
1.7/ 2/ 2
13.15
5
1
.9b
50.7
.39
.15
2295. 7
.Ob
.02
3?b.3
2.07
lb.07
8b8
3.58
587
bl*
b.10
CARBON DIOXIDE
3
HOT TRANSIENT
7P7.t (31.0)
77H.7 (30. &)
»3.3 (llfl.O)
fUSbt
7b.O (2b83.9)
18. 2/ ?/ 18
10. 5/ ?/ 10
12. fa/13/ 12
1.0/13/ 1
80. 5/ 3/ l.»8
».?/ 3/ .Ob
39. n/ 3/ 117
.•»/ 3/ 1
9.0*
9
11
1.H2
11S.9
.39
.95
1979.8
lb.80
.07
.17
3*5. H
2.93
l*.7b
505
3.**
558
bH8
5.73
.910 (
1.000 (
IDE G/KM
PTION L/100KM
S (THC) G/KM
XIOE G/KM
ITROGEN G/KM
*
STABILIZED
787.* (31.0)
77*. 7 (30.5)
*3.3 (110. H)
b9b3*
130.* (*bOb,9)
13. O/ 2/ 13
8.b/ 2/ 9
2.0/13/ 2
.9/13/ 1
59. 2/ 3/ 1.05
*.!/ 3/ .Ob
50. 3/ ?/ 50
2.0/ 2/ 2
12.78
5
1
.99
*8.S
.38
.17
23b2.5
12.05
.Ob
.03
385.7
1.97
lb.*7
8b8
3. 38
bD5
faSB
b.12
.900)
.978)
20*..*
ll.Bfa
3-BAG
3b7.3 (
15.77 (
.12 (
1.10 (
a.to (
(*-BAG)
370.1)
15.89)
.13)
1.10)
a. 57)
-------
PVM - SX1
t-6, TESl NO. 511-32 EMISSIONS RESULTS
3BT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED 02 SENSOR
PROJECT 11-5402-Oni
w
I
VEHICLE MODEL
ENGINF 5.7 L
?9 MERCURY MARQUIS
ciD) v-a
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAG CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEG. c CDEG. F>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HG(IN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HaodN.
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRESCSCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD MfTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COS CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS ,
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER» PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, OEG C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP., OEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., OEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
F)
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2434 KG( S3b5 L8S)
511-32
SET
1
4/30/79
4142KM( 2574MILES)
2-1-3
2b.7 / Btl.O
50.8
742.7 (29.24)
1398
787.4 (31.0)
771.7 (30.5)
•»3.3 (110.0)
210.1 (7420.8)
8.3/ 2/
23.3/13/
2.0/I3/
8b.9/ 3/
4.3/ 3/
51. 0/ 3/
.?/ 3/
7
19
1.5b
151.2
.8fa
8
?g
2
l.bl
.07
153
?
5184.3
b?.(lb
.87S ( .871)
I. 000 ( .175)
210.1
21.51
511-32
7H2.7
11.4
8h.7
25.49
3.92
hi?
715
278.2
11. 89
.04
.2?
2. 86
TEST WEIGHT 2041 KG( 4500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KH( 15.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM.344
511-33
HFET
1
4/30/79
41bOKM( 2S85MILES)
2-1-3
2b.7 / 80.0
H7.5
742.7 (2H.24)
7bb
787.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (1111.0)
b!503
115.2 (40b9.l)
9.7/ 2/ 10
7.5/ ?/ 8
S.H/13/ S
.1/13/ 0
97.I/ 3/ 1.83
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
31.I/ 3/ 93
.b/ 3/ 2
3
5
1.78
91.7
.21
.bb
3749.3
20.15
.8b4 ( ,85b)
1.000 ( .974)
115.2
Ib.lb
511-33
74?.7
10.b
2b.7
21.23
1.3R
bOb
S3b
232.0
9.HI
.01
.04
1.25
-------
TABLE E-7,
PVM - 51? FTP
TEST NO. 511-12 EMISSIONS RESULTS
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT l
-ESI NO. Sia-11
VEHICLE MODEL ?q MERCURY MARUUIS
tNGINE 5.7 LO51 CIP) V-B
TRANSMISSION AS
GVN ?»3H KH( "5Jb5 I.BS)
M
00
bAROMFTF.R 7f4.73 1M HG(?9.1? IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY f; PCT
BAG RESULTS
HAG DUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHEH DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(iN. H?OJ
BLOhER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. Cll. METRFS(SCH)
HC SAMPLF.
HCKGRO
SAMPLE METERXRANGEXPHH
bCKGRD MEfFRXRANGExPPM
CO? SAMPLE MEFEnXtfANGEXpCT
CO? BCKGRO METERXRANGEXPCT
NOX SAMPLE METERXRANGEXPPM
NOX BCKGRD MFTERXRANGEXPPM
DILUTION FACTUR
HC
CO
CO
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRAUON PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
MC MASS GRAMS
CO 1ASS GRAMS
CO* MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
rtC GRAMSXKM
CO GRAMS/KM
COa GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BV CB LXllHlKrt
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. RXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KH
DFC, H£T (DRY)
SCF, WET CORY)
VOL C3CM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMPER 512-.11
BAROMETER MM HG ?»».?
HUMIDITY G/KU 8.7
TEMPERATURE UEG c SH.W
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE b/lt/79
HAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. S
DRV BULB TEMP. 2H.H DEG C(7b.O OEG F)
AdS. HUMIDITY 8.7 GM/KG
TOTAL FUF.L SULFUR
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG.
CATALYST MAX.
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
838.2 (33.0)
8ia.8 (32.0)
43.3 (lln.O)
tOSt 2
75.7 (2
-------
TABLE E-8. TEST NO. 512-12 EMISSIONS RESULTS
SIS SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT U-5-»oa-OOl
>* MERCURY
ENGINF 5.7 LOS1 CIO) V-H
TEST NUMflEW
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMREH
DATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAG CART - DYNAMOMETER
TFMPEPATURE OEG. C (DEG. F)
KELAUVF. HUMIDITY, PCT
BAHOHETF.R, MM HGCIH HG)
RUM TIME, SECONDS
WLOWF.R OIF P MM. H20(IN. H?.U)
BLOWER INLET t> MM. H?OUN.
SLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OEG
rtl.OrtER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STO. c\>.
HC SAMPLE METEK/RANGE/PPM
HC ICMiRO ME
co SAMPLE ME
CO BCKRRO METFR/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PCT
co? RCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PP^
NOX UCKGRC METFR/RANGE/PP^
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
coz CONCENTRATION Per
NMX CONCENTHAlION PPM
HC MASS
co MASS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
OFC, WET
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOl (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
PVM-ST
MM HP,
OFG C
MG/KM
IEST NUMhER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATUKt,
TOTAL FUF.L 3"I,FUR,
AVQ. EXH. OXfiiEN,
CATALYST AVG. TEMP.. DER C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DER C
CARBON OIOXJDt, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/KIOKH
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW a«t3» KG( 53h5 LBS)
TEST HEIGHT 2tm KG( >»SOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD e.s KNC 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE E
SET
h/lt/79
M( bB
?. - 1 - 3
b.7 / 8U.O
H7.5
51?-L3
HFET
I
13S7
S38.? (33.0)
H15.8 (3a.O)
f3.3 (110.0)
(737R.1)
17.-*/ ?/ 17
13. U/ a/ 13
H9.5/I3/ HI
1.8/J3/ ?
(JS.9/ 3/ 1.51
3.»/ 3/ .05
H7
2
I/ ?/
b
3R
1.55
5SI7.3
18.13
,8«1 ( .873)
1.1)00 ( ,S7b)
21.38
515-15
7tf .2
10. b
?b.7
?S.3R
3.qb
5bt
blO
a?b.7
11.81
.03
11010KM( b8tlMILE3)
2-1-3
27.2 / 81.0
51 .3
7f*. 7
B38.2 (39. n)
812.8 (32.0)
>«3.q (111.0)
bl
lit. 5
10. ?/ 2/ 11
1.3/ 2/ 9
.H/13/ 0
t3.S/ 2/ 1.S5
1.3/ 2/ .05
bl.l/ 2/ bl
l.S/ 2/ 2
3
b7.5
.18
.52
CAPKON MONOXIDE,
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,
15. 3H
( ,3fb)
l.nno ( .172)
lit .5
lb.22
512-13
71*1*.?
11. 8
3.3q
51)1*
b!8
2-»S.3
in. 52
.01
.03
-------
PVM -
TABLE E-9. TEST NO. 512-21 EMISSIONS RESULTS
51? FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - 1? PCT *IS9 w/0
PROJECT ii
TEST NO. sia-ai HUN i
VEHICLE MODEL ?1 MERCURY HAPQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(3?i cio) V-H
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?f3H KG( 53K5 LHS)
BAROMETER 7»<«.?? MM HG(2i.3n IN
RELATIVE HUMIDITY h? PCT
BAG RESULTS
PAT, NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. HaOUN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?l)(lN. H?0)
6LOWER INLET TUMP. DEG. C(OEG. f)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METHES(SCF)
SAMPLE METKRXRANGEXPPM
BCKGRD METERXRANGFXPPM
SAMPLE METFRX8ANGE/PP1
BCKGRD MtTf R/RANGE/PP^
SAMPLE MFTERXRANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
VEHICLE NO.
DATE b/8
BAP, CART NO.
DYNO NO.
CVS NO.
TEST WEIGHT on«»l KG( '•Sen I
1CTUAL Rf»»0 LOAD B. * K»( 1P.U HP)
DRY PULB TEMP. ?3.q DEC CO5.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.9 GM/KG
ra
M
o
I
COLO TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HC
HC
CO
CO
NOX
DILUTION F4CTOP
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTPAT ION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
coa MASS GPAMS
NOx MASS G«AMS
HC GRAHSXKM
CO GRAM5XKM
CO? GRAHSX"*
NOX GRAMSXKM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB LX1HOKM
PUN TIME
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG. TFMP.
CATALYST KAX. TE1F.
MEASURED DISTANCE
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, «ET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KH (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
rear HUHDF.O
»4|?oMETEff HH HC
HV*10ITY C/K6
DEC C
SECONDS
PERCENT
DFG. C
OEG. c
KM
881.0 (35.0)
l»3.<' (lll.P)
7H.7 (2b»0.1)
b8.P/ 3/
8.0/ 3/
51. I/ 3/
.H/ 3/
BB.H/ 3/
».S/ 3/
?/
bl 1
1181
1.5B
37.1
ab.33
102.81
.07
»0
e
H.51
17.bO
371.9
.Ib
17. bS
505
2.08
505
713
.sa
383.3
.52
Ib.SI
.78
.817 ( .885)
1.000 ( ,17»)
af'2.8
1?.07
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR NG/K* 35.
AVG. FXH. ofrCEN PCT .
c GX«M
CARpoN MONCixrnE G/KM
OKIOFS OF NITROGEN
3-BAG
ib.S8
8. fib
.*>!
(4-8AG)
( Ib.'^O)
( 1.7S)
( 8.78)
( .ba)
-------
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY
ENGINE 5.7 L(3Si CIO) v-n
TEST NUMBE"
TEST CYCLE
BUN NUMRFfi
DATE
OOOHETFR
CVS - HAT, C«
W
I
- DYNAMOMET6R
PEG. C (PEG. F)
PE(ATIVF HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HG(IN HG)
PUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOWER OIF P MM. HPOCIN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. nao(iN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OFG. C(OEG. f
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPI.F. MflER/RANGF/PPM
BCKGRO MFTER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PP*
co? SAMPLE METEH/RANGF./PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
MOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD M.FTER/KANGE/PPM
CONCENTRATION PPf
CONCENTRATION PPf
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
ro? MASS GRAMS
MOX MASS GRAMS .
DFC, "'FT (DRY)
SCF, »ET (DRV)
VOL (5>c*i)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMPE", PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEC c
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, M(;/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TpMP., DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., D?G C
CARBON DIOXIOE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
riC
co
CO
NHX
HC
CO
P./KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NlT»OGF.N,
TABLE E-10, TEST MO. 512-22 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - si? S8T VEHICLE, FMSSIONS RESULTS - 1? PCT "ISS w/0
PROJECT iv-
t; 1 ?-?3
HFET
I
VEHICLE MO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2.'l HP)
GASOLINE EM-3-**
SET
b3()3MILES)
- 1 - 3
t / 7b.n
J317
(35.0)
HH.H (11?. 0)
71. n/ ?/
71
n.3/ 2/ 13
b3.b/ii/ ato
p.n/ii/ b
R1.fl/ 3/ l.bfa
H.8/ 3/ .0?
ah.o/ a/ ab
.«)/ a/ i
l.SR
a?. 2
7.0*
57. q?
(
i.noo ( .973)
5.h
. ?P
in.R
PH.H
?5.7b
7B7
1II177KM(
2-1-3
?3.n / 7S.O
9 !•».•< (?b.tO
889.0 (35. fO
/ /
lie. 9 (399b.7)
33. ?/ f.t 33
ia.s/ ?/ 13
57.7/ia/ 1?!)
.OH
H5.8/ a/ ,
a.i/ ?/
3b.i/ a/
i.n/ a/
as
1 1 7
1.9P
35.3
15.HO
7.70
( .B35)
l.non ( .
11?.9
11.1
?3.9
P'J.nn
.?9
778
7^1
P*1).?
10.73
.09
.•*»•
-------
TABLE E-ll. TEST NO. 512-31 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - si? FTP VFHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - 12 PCT HISS W/0 AI«
PROJECT H-5*n?-nni
TEST NO. 51?-31 RUN I
VFHICLE *ODEL 7* MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINF 5.7 1(351 CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION AS
GVW ?H3t KG( 53b5 LBS)
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE b/2a/71
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. ?
TEST NEIGMT an>»i KG< HSOO LBS)
»CTU»L ROAD LOAD 8.1 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3*»
ODOMETER 10115 KM( b33S MILES)
BAROMFTER 7t3.*b MM HG(?1.i?7 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY b? PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAT, NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
DRY BULB TEMP. S3. 3 r>EG C(7f.O OEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.3 G^/KG
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
n
i
M
M
HC
co
co
DTP P MM. HaO(IN. H?0)
IfiLKT P MM. H?.rj(lN. H?o)
BLOWER iNLFT TEMP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS PLOW STD. Cll.
HC SAMPLF
BCKGRD METER/KANGF/PPM
SAMPLE MFTER/RAN&E/PPM
BCKGKD MF.TER/RANGF/PPM
ro? SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PCT
Co? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/R/NGF/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
HC
CO
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOx MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
Co GRAMS/KM
CO? GPAMJ5/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM
PUN TIMF.
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG. TEMP.
CATALYST MAX. TEMP,
MEASUHEO DISTANCE
OFC, HET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOt. (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
BAROMETFR MM HG
HUMIDITY G/KG
TEMPERATURE DEG c
PERCENT
OEG. r
OFG. C
KM
7"M.5
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR
AVG. FXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG.
CATALYST MAX.
OLD TRANSIENT
101.7 (35.5)
87b.3 (3*. 5)
*3.3 (lln.O)
*n5i8
75.0 (ah*i.a)
52. H/ 3/ 52H
*.a/ 3/ *a
*a.s/ 3/ mis
.3/ 3/ 7
8H.H/ 3/ l.Sb
s.a/ 3/ ,nn
**.*/ a/ **
3.0/ a/ 3
7.8*
H87
158
1 ,*1
•M .8
at.na
83. bl
ao*8.*
b.ia
3.^5
i*.*i
35*. 7
i.nb
Ib.bl
505
l.bl
*77
b87
5.77
.ioe
l.noo
STABILIZED
101.7 (35.5)
87b.3 (3*. 5)
*3." (111.0)
711H5
131.* (*b*a.b)
17. ?/ ?/ 17
*3.e/ 2/ *3
b7.3/ll/ 382
a. a/ii/ 7
51. D/ 3/ 1.0*
H.b/ 3/ .07
15. 2/ 2/ 15
3.0/ 2/ 3
la.Hi
57
2b5
.18
12. H
*.3b
HO. 51
235*. *
3.11
.70
b.53
371. H
.51
lb.73
Rb8
.8*
b*3
bS7
b.ai
( .BIO)
( .175)
anb. H
1 LIB
HOT TRANSIENT
101.7 (35.5)
87b.3 (3*.S)
*3.1 (111.0)
*038S
?*. 5 (eb3e.a)
28. 7/ 3/ £87
*.5/ 3/ *5
28. l/ 3/ bSS
.!/ 3/ 2
BO.*/ 3/ l.*8
*.1/ 3/ .08
18. H/ a/ 18
3. I/ a/ 3
8.5*
8*7
b2 1
l.*l
15.7
10. b3
53.88
11?b.3
a. 28
1.8*
1.33
333.5
.31
15.11
SO*
.73
bll
730
5.78
.111? (
i.onn (
STABILIZED
101.7 (35.5)
87b.3 (3*. 5)
*3.1 (111.0)
bi*aa
les.i c*5a*.t)
13. O/ a/ 13
38. 7/ 2/ 31
b9.a/il/ J87
3.3/11/ 10
57. b/ 3/ i.na
*.1/ 3/ .08
i*.3/ a/ i*
a.8/ a/ 3
ia.73
57
2b7
.15
11.7
* .a*
31. aa
aan.i
a. 13
.b8
b.»a
357.8
.H7
15.71
Bb8
.81
bH?
bbP
b.an
.815)
.17b)
aoa.b
11.18
3-BAG (H-BAG)
-UR MG/KM 3«
•N PCT
rEMP. DEG C
EMP. DEG C
>.8* CARBON
DIOXIOE G/KM
.is FUFL CONSUMPTION L/IOOKM
bio HYDROCARBONS (THO G/KM
73n CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
3fal.7 (
ib.ab (
I.b3 (
8.15 (
.51 (
355.3)
15.18)
I.b2)
8.12)
.58)
-------
TABLE E-12, TEST NO. 512-32 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 512 SB1 VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - 1? PCT MISS X/0
PROJECT iv-s«*na-nni
VEHICLE MODFL
ENGINF 5.7
7q MERCURY MAPQIIIS
cu>) v-«
TEST
TEST C*CLE
HUN NUMBER
O*TE
ODOMETER
CVS - HAT, CART
- DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERA TUPfc hF.G. C (DEO. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HGfIN HT, )
PUW TIME, SECONDS
DIP P MM. H3P(IN. H?0)
INI.ET P MM. H?ncin. H?O)
INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
RLOWFR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO MElER/RANGF/opM
co SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co ^CKGHD METER/RANGE/PPM
ro? SAMPLE METER/RANPF/PCT
co? BCKT.RD MFTER/RANGE/PCT
MOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGHP Mt TER/RANGE/PPM
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO "ASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GKAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
DEC, WET (DRY)
SCE, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM>
KM (MEASURED)
TEST
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
IOTAL EUEL SIILFUP,
AVG. FXH. OXYGEN,
CATALYST AVG. TEMP.,
CATALYST KAX. TEMP.,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
PVM-ST
MM »r,
G/KG
()tG C
MG/KM
PCI
DEG C
HFC r
G/KM
CAPBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. SX
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW PH3H KG( 53bS LBS)
51J-3?
SET
I
h/?J
- I - 3
.b / 78.0
b3.7
S (PS.27)
1317
101.7 (35. S)
fl7h.3 (3».5)
tf.H (11P.O)
111837
80b.P (72B2.it)
qn.sx ?.' so
e5.s/ ?/ ?s
71.8/11/ 310
3.8/I1/ 10
8b.P/ 3/ 1.R1
a?.?/
•»/ ?/
hs
?8b
1 .S?
Pl.ll
fl. in
".Ob
.878 ( ,8bb)
i.nnn ( .971)
518-3?
7*3.5
13. •»
??.(>
JH.flb
.53
7?1
781
?bS.b
11. bO
.38
3.18
TEST WEIGHT go»l KG( H500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 13.n HP)
GA9QLINE E
513-33
HFET
1
h/21/79
b37?MILES)
2 - 1 - 3
?5.b / 7R.D
Sb.1;
7H3.S (?q.27)
(31.5)
87b.3
^t.f (11?. 0)
bl^Ol
11*. 7 (H051.B)
fO.H/ 8/ fn
i^.o/ ?/ jq
b3.7/12/ 1H3
3. I/I?/ 5
»5.n/ ?/ 2.01
3.H/ 2/ .Oq
27. O/ ?/ ?7
I.I/ ?/ 1
?H
!3n
1 .b)
17.39
"OF7.1
5.9*
.8<»9 ( .839)
1.000 ( .970)
11*. 7
lb.3b
513-33
7-M.S
11.6
.30
7b9
78P
10. b7
.1(1
l.n^
.3b
-------
TABLE E-13. TEST NO. 513-11 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 513 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIF1EP
PROJECT ll-5»n?-fini
513-11 PUN )
MODEL T* MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LOSI CID) v-a
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW ?t3H KG( S3b5 LHS)
BAROMETER 738.09 MM HG(?q.nq IN
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5? PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. HPO)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?O(IN. H?O)
BLOWER INLFT TFMP. DFG. CCOEG.
BLOWFR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRFS(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
HC nCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGF./PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
W
I
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
Co CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS G.RAMS
Co? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lonKM
RUN TIME St'CONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFC, W£T (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRV)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
513-11
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
BAROMETER MM HG
HUMIPITr 6/KG 10.?
TEMPERATURE f>£G C 2f.»
VEHICLE NO.
51
BAG CART NO.
OYNO NO.
CVS NO.
KG( HSOO LHS)
B.9 Kw( 1 ? . (I HP)
-0
DRY BULB TEMP. ?H.-» PEG C(7b.O DEG F)
A8S. HUMIDITY 10. 5 GM/KG
TtST rF.IGM
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
RASOLINF Eh- 344
ODOMETER "I KM(
NOX HU^IDIIY CORRECTION FACTOR
I
COM) TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HdT
SIAHIL17EO
B?5.S
81?. 8
*3.3
"»0
75.?
*S.S/
11. b/
7S.P/1
1.7/1
R1.?/
H.3/
57. I/
l.b/
7
(3?.
(32.
(Ill)
58b
5)
n)
.0)
838
800
•»3
.? (33.
.1 (31.
. * (llll
hip 1 B
0)
5)
.0)
R?5
snn
•n
(?bS5.5) 1?9.5 (*S72.3) 7<,
?/
?/
I/
I/
3/ 1
3/
?/
?/
.88
"»b
i?
353
5
. bb
.07
57
Z
1*.
in.
3b.
5.
bO.
«».
15.
1.
b/ ?/
5/ ?/
?/13/
»/l 3/
n/ 3/ i
b/ 3/
I/ ?/
3/ ?/
1?.55
15
10
3*
5
.Ob
.07
15
1
20.
i?.
87.
7.
en.
33.
1.
.5 (3?.
.1 (31.
.3 OK)
HOS38
.2 (?b5
O/ ?/
n/ ?/
?/13/
?/l 3/
5/ 3/ 1
7/ 3/
3/ ?/
i/ e/
B.qq
5)
5)
.i')
b.q)
20
15
88
7
. tfl
.Ob
33
1
H?5
>5UO
H3
1?8
I1*.
11.
33.
b.
58.
I1*.
J.
.5 (3?.
.1 (31.
.3 (110
bM51h
.q (tss
b/ ?/
I/ it
1/13/
1/.13/
I/ 3/ 1
b/ 3/
B/ ?/
3/ g/
13. ni
5)
5)
.10
^ • "
15
11
31
b
.03
.Ob
IS
1
331
l.bO
55.7
1.55
7.88
.87
1.37
lh.7*
505
5
l.no
13.q
.37
?3bS.7
3. 3"*
.Ob
.b"
385.H
.55
lb.50
q
77
1.H3
38.3
b.7H
llbH.7
*.S7
.07
1.18
505
b.lt
?5
13.b
.32
3.7?
23011.7
3.30
.05
.bl
3?b. 3
lb.07
RbH
b.13
.103 (
1.000 ( ,<»78)
1 1.
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TF.MP. DEG c
CATALYST MAX. TFMR. PEG c
CARBON DIOXIDF
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYOROCARPONS
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
.S10 (
i.oon (
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KH
G/KM
.SP1)
. q7q)
? 0 "* . 1
11. R7
3-BAC
373^
Ib.Ub
.11
1.73
. 7**
(H-RAG)
( 370.?)
( 15.13)
( .1U)
( 1.71)
-------
TABLE E-14, TEST NO, 513-12 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVH - 513 SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-5*02-001
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LO51 CID) V-8
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
cva - BAG CART
- DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HG(IN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?O(!N.
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DF_G. C(PEG
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW SfD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE M£T£R/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/R ANGF/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS .
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
F)
PVM-ST
MM HG
G/KG
DEC C
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
AVR. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. Tf.MP., OEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/lnnKM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2»3l> KG( 53b5 LBS)
SET
1
s/?s/79
KM{ MILES)
2-1-3
?5.b / 78. 1)
H3.1
738.9 (?9.09)
1315
85n.9 (33.5)
812.8 (33.0)
Y3.3 (110.0)
111780
20b.9 (73flb.?)
18. ?/ ?/ 18
1S.O/ 2/ IS
81. ?/ 3/ l.bb
».*/ 3/ .07
»?.b/ ?/ »3
!.»/ ?/ 1
5
H3
l.bO
"»!.»
.bO
J0.3S
bOb<).8
15.58
,87b ( .BbS)
1.000 ( .977)
?1.57
513-12
738.9
9.0
?5.b
25.81
03
.»B
7?
TEST WEIGHT ?0"H KG( HSOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD ».9 K*«( 12.fl HP)
GASOLINE EM-3»»
513-13
HFET
1
5/28/7S
KM( MILES)
e - i - 3
35. b / 78. 0
«»3.1
738.1
838.2 (33.0)
812.8 (32. n)
»3.3 (110.0)
blSOt
113.7 Ct017.t)
12. S/ 5/ 13
13. O/ ?/ 13
15
1
1.0/13/
»S.O/ ?/
I.?/ ?/
b3.?/ 3/
.Ob
b3
1
1H
1.15
b?.n
.09
I ,8H
•»0b7.7
1?.79
.850 (
1.000 ( .97f)
113.7
513-13
738.1
1.1
SS.b
??.b9
in.59
.01
.11
.78
-------
TABLE E-15. TEST NO. 513-21 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 513 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED EGR AND AIR
PROJECT 11-5402-001
TEST NO. 513-51 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MAPOUI3
ENGINE 5.7 L(351 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH ?H3t KG( 53b5 LBS)
BAROMETER 739.90 MM HG(?9.i3 IN
RELATIVE HUMIDITY sb PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HeodN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
RLOWPP REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(9CF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RAis|GE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METF.R/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? sAMpLE METER/RANGE/pCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
I HC CONCENTRATION PPM
£ CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
co GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEC. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, HET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 513-21
BAROMETER MM H6 739.9
HUMIDITY G/KG 10.1
TEMPERATURE DEG C ?«.4
VEHICLE NQ. 51
DATE 5/31/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. ?
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(7b.O DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.9 GM/KG
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
812.8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
*3.3 (110.0)
40bb2
75.7 (2b73.3)
22. 9/ 3/ ?29
1.4/ 3/ 14
58, n/ S/ 2915
.3/ 2/ 11
83. 5/ 3/ 1.5H
4.3/ 3/ .07
40. I/ 2/ 40
l.l/ 2/ 1
7.27
?17
27b4
1.49
31.2
9.47
243. bO
2058. 9
5.71
I.b4
42.25
357.1
.11
18.30
505
.bl
328
440
5.77
812.8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
45.8 (101.0)
b947b
129.4 (4571.3)
lb.4/ 3/ Ib4
1.5/ 3/ IS
?3. 1/ 3/ 1123
2.0/ 3/ 45
55. b/ 3/ .18
5.0/ 3/ .08
8.S/ ?./ 1
l.l/ 2/ 1
11.38
150
-1812
.11
7.5
11.22
273.15
2147.1
1.87
1.81
44.14
34b.1
.30
18.01
Bb?
.40
422
43b
b.11
.B91* ( .BBH)
1.000 ( .978)
205.1
11.9b
TEST HEIGHT 20-»1 KG( fSOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-34H
ODOMETER 8B7t KM( 551* MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.01
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMR. DEG c
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG C
37.02
.H3
»oi
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTI
HYDROCARBONS (
CARBON MONOXIDE
800.1 (31.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
40530
75. b (Zbb^.l)
lb.5/ 3/ IbS
l.b/ 3/ Ifa
70.2/ 3/ 1828
l.b/ 3/ 3b
74. 4/ 3/ 1.35
5. I/ 3/ .08
15. b/ 2/ lb
l.O/ 2/ 1
B.b?
151
l?lb
1.28
14.7
b.57
151.03
1777.1
2.14
1.14
2b.2b
301.1
.37
15.11
SOS
.33
392
4fab
5.75
.104 (
1.000 (
IDE G/KM
»TION L/IOOKM
3 (THC) G/KM
(IDE G/KM
[TROGEN G/KM
812.8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
b9442
129.2 (45b4.4)
14.1*/ 3/ 14-»
!.»/ 3/ 14
58. ?/ 3/ 1457
1.4/ 3/ 3?
55. 5/ 3/ .17
S.3/ 3/ .08
7.3/ 2/ 7
.I/ 2/ 1
11.87
131
1375
.10
b.S
9.78
20b.99
2128.4
l.bl
1.51
33. bb
34b.l
.2b
17.24
8b?
.38
424
f 40
b.15
.814)
.178)
204.8
11.90
3-BAG
338. b (
17.27 (
1.51 (
98.84 (
.4b (
(4-BAG)
338.4)
17.05)
1.53)
35.73)
.45)
-------
PVM - 5X3
E-16, TEST NO, 513-22 EMISSIONS RESULTS
SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED EGR AND AIR
PROJECT 11-5H02-001
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LC351 CID) V-8
TEST NUMOER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAG CART
M
I
- DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (OEG. F)
RELATIVE HUMiOiTY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HG(IN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
B|.OWER INI.ET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. PEG. CCDEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STO. cu. METRF.S(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METEW/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANgE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGHD MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER, PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG c
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, MG/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGFN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP., DEG C
CATALYST MAx. T£MP., DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH 2«»3'» KG( ' 53b5 LBS)
513-??
SET
I
5/31/79
8903KM( 5S32MILE3)
2-1-3
2*.* / 7b.o
tS.l
739.9 (29.13)
1397
812.8 (38.0)
787.
-------
TABLE E-17. TEST NO. 513-31 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - ?13 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED ECR AND AIM
PROJECT 11-5402-001
TEST NO. 513-31 RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL ?i MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LOSI ciD) v-a
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW S13H KG( 53bS LB3)
BAROMETER 742.19 MM HG(?9.22 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59 PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE b/ 1/79
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 5
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(7b.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.b GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT SOHI KG( HSOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.n HP)
GASOLINE EM-3»»
ODOMETER 9043 KM( 5bl9 MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
03
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H2U)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OUN.
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DPG. C(PEG
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METFR/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
Co CONCENTRATION PP*
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
F)
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION 8Y CB L/1POKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 513-31
BAROMETER MM HG ?42.2
HUMIDITY G/KG ii.t>
TEMPERATURE DEG c 34.4
COLD TRANSIENT
812.B (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
40491
75.7 (2b73.b)
STABILIZED
20
1
H
R2
4
39
2
.9/ 3/
,4/ 3/
.O/ 3/
.!/ 3/
.5/ 3/
.!/ 3/
,7/ 2/
.2/ 2/
7.50
197
2445
1.47
37.8
B.bO
215.51
2033.7
5.b4
1.49
37.30
352.0
.98
17.73
505
.47
322
440
5.78
209
14
2571
2
1.52
.Ob
40
2
TOT*L FUEL SULFUR
AVG. FXH. OXYGEN
CATALYST AVG. TEMP.
CATALYST MAX. TEMP.
.818 (
1.000 ( .977)
205.7
11.8b
MG/KM 3b.3V
PCT .71
DEG C 391
DEC C «bb
HOT TRANSIENT
912.8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
b95fa2
130.0 (4592. b)
14. b/ 3/ 14b
1.3/ 3/ 13
bl.l/ 3/ 1544
.3/ 3/ 7
54. 9/ 3/ .9b
».0/ 3/ .Ob
S.I/ 2/ 9
l.b/ 2/ 2
11.91
134
1480
.91
?.b
10. Ob
224.04
2157.7
l.lb
l.bS
3b.B3
354.7
.32
17.83
8b7
.74
421
43b
b.08
812.8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
40503
75. b (2b71.fc)
11. 3/ 3/ 113
l.l/ 3/ 11
53. B/ 3/ 1330
,S/ 3/ 11
74. b/ 3/ 1.3b
4. I/ 3/ .Ob
39. 2/ 2/ 39
1.3/ 2/ 1
8.95
103
12bO
1.30
38.0
4.50
110.98
1804.1
S.b7
.78
11. Zb
313.0
.18
14. 7b
504
.78
311
4bfa
5.7b
STABILIZED
812. 8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 C110.0)
129.9 (4589.1)
20. b/ 2/ 21
10. 1/ 2/ 10
95.1/12/ 235
1.0/12/ 7
5b.9/ 3/ 1.00
4.0/ 3/ .Ob
S3.9/ 2/ 5»
1.8/ 2/ 2
13. Ob
11
219
.94
52.2
.82
33.19
2248. b
13.37
.13
5.40
3b5.S
2.18
lb.00
8b8
.79
448
457
b.14
.911 ( .899)
1.000 ( .177)
205.b
11.11
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC> G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
3-BAG
3«2.b
lb.9b
1.38
32. 05
.b»
C»-BAG)
( 3*5. 9}
( lb.12)
( .f3)
( 22. 8»)
( 1.11)
-------
TABLE E-l*. TEST NO. 513-32 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - S13 VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISABLED EGR AND AIR
PROJECT 11-5^02-QOl
VEHICLE MODEL ""^ MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LOSI ciD) v-s
TEST NUMBER
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
PATE
ODOMETER
CVS - BAR CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE DEC. C (DEC. F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HGCIN HG>
RUN TJMEr SECONDS
RLOWPR DIE P MM. H?0(IM. H3Q)
RLOWER INLET p MM. H?O(!N. H?O)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. DEG. CfDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
cn SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/HANGE/PPM
cos SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
j CO? BCKGRD MfTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
^ NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MARS GRAMS
MOX MASS GRAMS
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCF, HET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER, PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HR
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, PEG c
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, MR/KM
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP., PEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., OFG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITKOGEN, G/KM
VEHICLE NO. si
TRANSMISSION A3
r,v« ana* KG( sabs LBS)
513-32
SET
1
b/
qn?nKM(
2-1-3
?*.«» / 7b.O
51 .S
13S7
818.8 (32.0)
7P7.» (31.0)
»3.3 (110. 0)
309.5 (71*00.3)
2b.b/ ?/ 27
10. •*/ 2/ 10
51.1/I1/
1.5/U/
88.
3/ l.b*
3/ ,0«t
?./ 88
17
1R1
l.bl
bl.1
?.ll
HH. If
blbl .9
25. hi
.B7b ( .Bb7)
J.OOO ( .97f)
Sl.-Mt
513-3?
in.i
.51
5H(I
.10
2. fib
1.20
TEST NEIGMT 2o»l KG( H500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD L0*0 8.9 «w( 12.n HP)
GASOLINE £
513-3?
HFET
i
b/ 1/79
? - I - 3
25. b / 7B.O
7b5
B50.S (33.5)
8?5.5 (32.5)
t3.3 (lin.O)
hi •»» 3
llt.b (»0'»S.2)
23. S/ 2/ 23
10. 9/ 2/ 11
S8.9/I3/ 57
2.8/13/ 3
tb.O/ 2/ 2
a.o/ 2/
a.9/ 2/
f.f/ ?/
Ob
07
93
51
?.nn
89.?
.9t
b.R1*
•H95.S
19.31
,8tb ( .B3B)
1.000 ( .971)
HH.b
lb.23
513-33
7H5.2
in. 3
25. b
?3.7?
h!9
b3b
85R.5
11.117
.('b
.*?
-------
TABLE E-19. TEST NO. 511-11 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 514 FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
TFST MO. r,i»-u HUN i
MUOEL 71 MERCURY MARiJUlS
s.? i.(35i cio) v-n
TRANSMISSION A3
GV* ?434 KG{ 5385 LRS)
IN HG>
PROJECT ll-5402-Unl
VEHICLE NO.
DATE
BAG CART NO.
DYNO NO.
CVS NO.
M
ro
o
BAROMFTER 73S.08 MM
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59 PCT
BAG RESULTS
«•' NIJMRER
DESCRIPTION
PLOWEP OIF P MM. H2CUIN. H?0)
BLOWER IMLET t3 MM. H?ofiN.
BLOWER INLET TFMP. OFG. C
-------
TABLE E-20. TEST HO, 5W-12 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 5iH SHT VEHICLF. EMISSIONS RESULTS - UNMODIFIED
PROJECT 11-S402-OU1
VEHICLE MODEL ?"» MERCURY MARQUIS
s.? 1(351 CID) V-B
I
to
TEST
TEST CYCLE
MJN MUMPER
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH 2*3» KG( 53bS LBS)
51H-12
SET
ODOMETER
cvs - BAG CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURfc OtG. C (OEG. F)
RELATIVE HiJMlOlTY, PCT
BAROMETER, MM HGlIN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
co
co
HC
CO
HC
CO
8LO«ER OIF P 1M. HSOdN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. neodN. H?O)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. PFG. C(DEG. F)
KLOWER REVOLUTIONS
rvs FLOW sTr». cu. METRFSCSCM
HC SAMPLE ME'EK/RANGE/PPM
BCKr,PD METER/RANfjE/PPM
SAMPLE ME TER/RANGE/PPM
9CKGRD METER/RANGF/PPM
to? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGPO METER/RANGF./PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS &HAMS
MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GfUHS
DFC, fET fDRY)
SCF» WET (DRY)
VOL (SCn)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER, PVM-ST
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, OEG C
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR, MB/KM
A«G. EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVR. TEMP., OEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEC C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/IODKM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KK
S080KM( 3778MILES)
2-1-3
ab.l / 79.0
sn.t
735.1 (?8.1»)
1318
800.1 (31. S)
787.'* (31.0)
»3.3 (lin.O)
11P057
S (7257.1)
. O/ S/ S3
20. H/ ?/
29.9/1 3/
.9/I3/
85. 9/ 3/ :
3.8/ 3/
•U.b/ 2/
1.8/ 2/
5
1.54
<»0.0
.bO
20
28
1
1.59
.Ob
"*2
2
15.68
.881 ( .872)
i.onn ( .975)
205.5
21.85
S1H-12
735.1
11.0
3.bq
5««3
2b5.»
11 .35
.03
.?•»
.73
TEST WEIGHT 20tl KG( »SOO LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 Krf( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE E
51H-13
HFET
)
5/10/79
3792MILES)
2-1-3
?b.7 / 80.0
HH.5
735.1 (28.9-n
7b7
800.1 (31.5)
7B7.f (31.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
112.9 (39B8.b)
lb.3/ ?/ Ib
lb.0/ 2/ Ib
3.9/13/ *
.2/13/ 0
»3.b/ 2/ 1.93
1.8/ ?/ ,07
bl.B/ 2/ b2
1.8/ 2/ ?
3
3
1.P7
fat). 3
.17
.•»5
3P75.3
12.73
.85b ( .8*9)
1. 000 ( .97»)
112.9
lb.20
514-13
735.1
10.0
2b.7
21 .89
b27
239.2
10. 21
.01
.03
.79
-------
TABLE E-21. TEST NO. 514-21 EMISSIONS RESULTS
S1H FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISCONNECTED CTS
PROJECT ll-5«0?-0fll
TEST NO. 5l-»-?l RUN 1
VEHICLE MOOFL 7* MERCURY MARRUTS
ENGINE 5.7 LOSj CII>1 V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVn ?H3«» KG{
BAROMETER 7»b'.?S M« HG(?9.3B IN MR)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5b PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMRFR
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DTP P MM. H?0(IN, H?0)
BLOWER INLET P »**. HPOCIN. H?OI
BLOWER TNLFT TEMP. OF.G. C(OEG. F)
BLOWFH REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STD. cu. METRESCSCM
HC sAMpi_f MFTER/RANRE/PPM
HC BCKGRO MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLF MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
co RCKGRO MFTER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPIF MFTFR/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD MFTFR/RANGE/PCT
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
VEHICLE NO. 51
DATE 5/15/79
BAG CART NO. I
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. ?i,i DEC C(7tl.n DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 8.8 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 2(m KG( »500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.S KW( 1?.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3«»«t
bHHH KM( *OOH MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
M
(0
to
NOX
NOX
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASs GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMJ/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GMAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG, EXH. OXvGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG' TEMP. DFG. C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. DEC. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WF.T (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL fSCM)
KM (MEASURED)
«5I»-?1
MM HQ 7»fe.3
S/*G B.S
Of 6 C 21.1
COMPOSITE
TEST
BAROMETER
HUMIDITY
TEMPERATURE
1
COLD TRANSIENT
81?.8 (3?.0)
787.» (31.0)
43.3 (110,0)
*ObOO
7b.3
?5.2/ 3/
I.3/ 3/ 13
b?.B/ ?/ 3?H7
,7/ ?/ ?7
?7,B/ ?/
1.3/ ?/
7.50
STABILIZED
81?.8 (32.0)
787.H (31.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
70»SO
13?,H C»b77.3)
17.9/ 3/ 179
1.7/ 3/ 17
53.b/ g/ ibii
.b/ ?/ ?3
55.?/ 3/ .97
H.O/ 3/ ,0b
b.?/ ?/ b
,8/ H/ 1
10,8?
307b
l.HO
3b,7
10.59
»73,?3
19SH.8
3.b7
l.BH
»7.»?
339.3
17J91
505
.bO
3«a
SDH
5.7b
.893
1.000
?505
,91
S.5
1?."»9
38b.?7
??1 3 . 0
1.31
2.01
b?.13
3Sb.O
19ib3
8b9
.*?
HbO
*8?
b.??
( .88?)
( .«»7B)
?08.7
U.'IB
Ib
Ib
1
HOT TRANSIENT
8!?.8 (3?.0)
787.4 (31.0)
*3.3 (110,0)
HO»bO
7b.O (?b8H,7)
21.P/ 3/
l.b/ 3/
bl.»/ ?/ 31*8
,7/ ?/ ?7
7».S/ 3/ 1.3b
».?/ 3/ .Ob
lb.3/ ?/
l.O/ ?/
7.99
19b
?98b
1.30
15.f
8.54
2b»,31
1809.3
1.50
Hb.OO
31H.9
.37
lb.73
SOS
STABILIZED
812.8 (32.0)
787."» (31.0)
*3.3 (lin.O)
b9b5?
130,9 («b??.0)
18,P/ 3/ 180
l.b/ 3/ Ib
57.1*/ ?/ 887?
,8/ ?/ 30
5H.8/ 3/
•».!/ 3/
b.l/
,9b
.Ob
b
10. b8
IbS
F.2
1?.H9
"U7.50
?lbf.8
1.22
a.01
b?.lb
19. bH
BbB
5?9
5.75
Hb9
b.??
.895 (
1.000 ( .978)
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 39.bl
AVG. EXH, OXYGEN PCT .»3
CATALYST AVG. TF.MP. DEC C »3b
CATALYST MIX. TEMP. OF.G C S?1
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
11.9b
3-BAG
3*1.3
18.48
1.83
(»-BAG)
339.0)
18.48)
1,83)
Sb.lb)
-------
TABLE E-22,
51H SBT
TEST HO, 5W-22 EMISSIONS RESULTS
DISCONNECTED CTS
VEHICLE MOPEL "> MERCURY MAROUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(15? CIO) V-8
W
TEST
TEST CYCLE
RUN NUMBER
DATF
ODOMETER
CVS - P»G CAST
- DYNAMOMETER
TEMPf-RATURF. nEG. C (OFG. F )
RELATIVE HIIMTDTTY, PCT
BAPQMETEK, MM HG(IN HR)
RUN TIMEf SECONDS
DIF P <»M. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLO*E» I'JLFT P MM. H?0(IN, HP01
BLOWER INLET TE^P. DEC. C(DFG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
r.vs FLOW STO'. cu. METRESCSCF)
SAMPLE MpTER/R*Mf;E/PPM
BCKGPO Mf TFR/RANRE/PPM
SAMPLE
HC
HC
co
co HCKGRD MFTF.R/RAMGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MpTFR/RANGE/PCT
CO? 8CKRRD MrTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MpTER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD MFTER/P.ANRE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GPAMS
CO MASS GPAM3
CO? MASS RBAM3
MASS GRAMS •
DFc, WET (DRV)
SCF, WET fDRV)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASIJPEO)
TEST NUMRFR,
BAROMETER,
PVM-ST
MM Hr'
TEMPEHATURF,
TOTAL FUFL SULFUR,
MG/KM
AVG, EXH. OXvGEN. PCT
CATALYST AVG' TEMP., DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/JOOKM
HfDROCApfiONS. G/KM
CARBON MOMnXTDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGFN, G/KM
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT n-5»oe-noi
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
QVW ?»3t KG(
L8SJ
TEST WEI3HT ?D"*i KG( «»bnO LB3)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KWC 12,0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3»»
SET
1
5/15/79
2-1-3
??.e / 73. n
•»b.3
7*b,3 f?9.3e)
1397
818.8 f3?.H)
787, * (31.0)
«*3,3 tlin.O)
111854
19. 7/ 3/ 197
!.»/ 3/ 1*
bf.8/ ?/ 3393
l.l/ ?/ »?
77. 5/ 3/ l.fg
».?/ 3/ .Ob
15.R/ ?/ ib
,b/ 2/ 1
185
1.3b
15.3
22. "»0
5.bb
( ,
1.000 C .978)
7»b.3
8.1
??,8
27.89
519
597
?»>». I
13.01
1
5/15/79
b50RKM(
2-1-3
?3.3 / 7».0
HO.l
7>»h.3 C29.3B)
lb
812. P (32.0)
7B?.>* (31. 0)
«*3.3 (110.0)
bl»77
115.5 (H079.b)
22. f/ 3/ 2?1*
l.b/ 3/
75. b/ ?/
1.7/ 2/
9b.3/ 3/ 1.81
"t.7/ 3/ .07
18. ?/ 2/ 18
.7/ ?/ 1
?U
b5
A. 75
535.81
370?. 5
3.50
.833 ( .828)
1.00P ( .977)
115.5
lb.37
S1H-23
7Hb.3
'.3
23.3
25. b»
.08
573
?2b.l
11. 9b
.Rb
32.73
.21
-------
PVM -
TABLE E-23. TEST NO. 5W-31 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISCONNECTED CTS
PROJECT U-S'»02-001
TEST no. 5iH-3i RUN i
VEHICLE MODEL 71 MERCURY MARUIIIS
fcNGINF 5.7 L(351 CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
SVW ?H3H KG( 53b5 LB5)
BAROMFTEP 7«»».q8 MM HG(d1.33 IN
RELATIVE HUMILITY 5? PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAR NUMSFR
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER RIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET ? MM. H2o(iN. H?.O)
BLPWER INLFT TEMP. OFG. c(oen.
RLOWEP DEVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
8CKGRD METFR/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
ro? SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGHD METER/RANGE/PCT
MOX SAMPLE METEK/RANGE/PPM
NOX RCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
M
M
HC
HC
CO
CO
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
cn CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
HOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
Co GRAMS/KM
cn? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB
RUN TIME SECONDS
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN PERCENT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. OFG. C
CATALYST MAX. TFMP. OEG. C
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, NET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
KM (Mf.AS(IRFD)
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TE.9T NUMBER 5l»-31
BAROMETER MM HG 7H5.D
HUMIDITY G/KG 10.1
OFG C ?*."»
VEHICLE NO.
DATE S
PAG CART NO
DYNO NO.
CVS NO.
51
ORY BULB TEMP. 2H.» OEG C(7h.O DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY XO.l GM/KG
1
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
812.8 (32.0)
787. H (31.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
HOblh
7b.2 (2b10.7)
27. OX 3/ 270
2.0/ 3X 20
b2.2/ 2X 3204
l.l/ 2/ »2
77. I/ 3/ 1.H3
3.B/ 3X .Ob
33. b/ 2/ 3H
?.-»/ 2/ 2
7.b2
253
3027
1.38
31.5
11.10
812.8 (32.0)
7B7.H (31.0)
f3.3 (110.0)
70371
132.0 (fbb3.b)
17. 2X 3/ 172
2.2/ 3X 22
So. I/ 2/ 2*00
I.?/ 2/ »b
Sb.1/ 3/ 1.00
».OX 3/ .Ob
7.7/ 2X 8
2.2/ 2/ 2
10. 72
152
2273
.15
S.7
11.58
2287. t
H.50
1.13
Hh.b7
333.5
.78
17. b3
SOH
.32
3H3
"»11
5.75
.R13
1.000
l.fl
Sb.4
3fa1.
.2
11.8
8bi
0.00
-
H78
b.11
( .BBH)
( .171)
208.2
1) .15
TEST WEIGHT ?o»i KGI »soo LBS)
ACTUAL «P»l> LOAD B.S K>*( 16.0 HP)
GASOLINE tM-3t4
ODOMETER b5»t KM( -»0bb MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .SB
HOT TRANSItNT
812.8 (32.0)
7B7.t (31.U)
•»3.3 (110.U)
SI ABILIZED
812.8 (32.0)
787. * (31.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
132.4 (fb7b.5)
20
1
5b
75
4
17
1
.IX 3/ 201
.7X 3/ 17
.I/ 2X 2BOS
.?/ 2/ 2?
.?/ 3/ 1.38
.O/ 3/ -Ub
.?/ 2X 18
.7/ 2X 2
8.03
18b
2bbO
1.33
lb. 2
8.18
235.17
1851.3
e.se
l.*2
HO. 13
321.1
. to
lb.b-»
50H
.32
H21
S25
5.7b
lb.7/ 3/
1.8/ 3/
HI. I/ 2/
.?/ 2/
Sb.5/ 3/
t.3/ 3/
b.b/ 2/
l.b/ 2/
10.80
151
2278
.13
5.3
11.51
351.21
22b*.2
1.33
1.8b
5b.71
3bb.b
.21
11. bS
8b8
.28
HfaO
HS5
b.11
Ib7
18
S38B
27
.11
.07
7
2
.BSb ( .887)
1.000 ( .171)
208. b
11.Sb
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR MG/KM 31.bi
AVG. EXH. OXyGEN PCT .12
CATALYST AVG. TEMP. DEG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP. OEG c sas
CARBON DIOXIDE
FUEL CONSUMPTION
HYDROCARBONS (THC)
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
G/KM
L/lOOKM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KH
3-BAG
3»8. b
18. »8
l.?b
50.1*
.31
(»-8AG)
( 3»7.5)
( 18.fi)
( 1.75)
( 50.23)
( .31)
-------
VEHICl E MODF.L 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGTNF s.f LUSJ cio) v-m
TEST NUMBEt*
TEST CYCLE
TABLE E-24. TEST NO. 514-32 EMISSIONS RESULTS
PVM - 51H SBT VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS - DISCONNECTED CTS
PROJECT 11-5H02-001
VEHICLE NO. 51
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 2H3H KG( 53faS LB3)
PATE
ODOMETER
CVS - t-AG CART - DYNAMOMETER
TEMPERATURE OEG. C fDEG. F)
RELATIVE hUMtOlTY, f'C T
BAROMETER, MM HGtIN HG)
RUN TIME, SECONDS
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER TMLET P MM. H20(iN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CH. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRG METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKRRO MITER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD MEfER/RANGE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION FPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
co? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
DFC, «ET (DRY)
SCFr WET (DRV)
VOL (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBEK,
BAf-OMETER»
HUMIOITy,
TEMPERATURE,
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR,
PVM-ST
MM HG
G/KG
DEC C
MG/KM
EXH. OXYGEN, PCT
CATALYST AVG. TEMP., DFG C
CATALYST MAX. TEMP., DEC C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION, L/IHOKM
HYPROCARBUNS, G/KM
CAFBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
TEST WEIGHf eo«H KG( »500 LBS)
ACTUAL BOAU LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-3Hf
SET
1
S/lb/79
b573KM( HOBfMILES)
5-1-3
?3.1 / 75.0
»n.B
7»h.3 (,?9.38)
1317
812.8 (32.0)
787.4 (31.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
7 (7»77.1)
?0.0/ 3/ 200
1.3/ 3/ 13
b3.fa/ S/ 3305
.8/ ?/ 30
78. 2/ 3/ 1.H3
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
lb.0/ 2/ .lb
.b/ a/ 1
189
1. 38
15.5
23. OH
775. lb
5357.2
5.70
.8b8 ( .8b?)
1.000 (
211.7
?1.8H
51f-32
7Hb.3
7.7
23.9
27. HH
52?
bOl
2H5.3
12.99
I.Ob
35. »9
.2b
51H-33
HFET
1
S/lb/79
b592KM( »09bMILES)
3-1-3
2H.H / 7b.O
HI .9
7Hb.3 (29.38)
812.8 (32.0)
787. » (31.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
lib.3 CU08.?)
22.3/ 3/ 223
2.0/ 3/ 20
7».3/ 2/ »132
1.3/ 2/ H9
9b.l/ 3/ 1.81
H.S/ 3/ .Ob
lb.9/ ?/ 17
,3/ 2/ n
3P88
1.75
Ib.b
13. 8*
3733.1
3. MB
.83H ( .888)
1.000 ( .975)
lib. 3
lb.»2
51H-33
?'«»'. 3
S.7
2H.H
25. bb
.08
583
h!8
227. •»
11.97
32.08
.21
-------
APPENDIX F
SHORT-TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
-------
TABLE F-l. CAR 51 - SHORT TEST PROCEDURES RESULTS
Steady State Raw Emissions Tests
Transient Cycle Tests
UNMODIFIED
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Temperature, °C
Carbon Dioxide , g/km
Fuel Cons . , Jl/lOOkm
Hy dro carbon s , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
511-2 Disabled 02 Sensor
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity , gAg
Temperature , °C
Carbon Dioxide , g/km
Fuel Cons. , VlOOkm
Hydrocarbons , g/kra
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
514-2 Disconnected CTS
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAg
Temperature , °C
Carbon Dioxide, gAm
Fuel Cons., VlOOkm
Hydro carbon s , gAm
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, gAm
FTP
740.2
11.1
25.6
358.5
15.41
0.12
1.35
0.85
FTP
737.6
10.2
24.4
354.7
15.21
0.09
0.82
2.42
FTP
746.3
8.8
21.1
341.3
18.48
1.83
54.67
0.34
NYCC
739.9
9.9
26.7
741.2
31.76
0.15
1.55
1.00
NYCC
738.9
9.0
27.2
647.4
27.65
0.07
0.13
1.79
NYCC
746.3
7.7
23.9
707.1
39.06
4.14
124.11
0.43
F£C
739.9
8.8
27.8
311.0
13.35
0.05
1.02
0.48
FSC
738.9
8.6
26.7
278.1
11.88
0.03
0.04
2.51
FSC
746.3
10.6
23.3
289.9
15.55
1.55
44.27
0.27
ppmH*
ppmNO
ppmH*
%
ppmNO
ppmH*
%
ppmNO
TSIT
2500
58
0
240
2500
67
0
388
2500
IDLE
59
0
35
IDLE
261
0.3
12
IDLE
162
2.7
52
241
2.9
3
FTM
52 MPH 25 MPH IDLE
67
0
925
67
0
263
67
0
35
52 KPH 25 MPH IDLE
71
<0.01
2288
49
0
830
261
0.3
17
52 MPH 25 MPH IDLE
130
1.9
250
183
4.0
22
256
3.2
3
-------
TABLE F-l (Cont'd) . CAR 51 - SHORT TEST PROCEDURES RESULTS
Steady State Emissions Tests
Transient Cycle
513-2 Disabled EGR
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Carbon Dioxide,
& Air
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
g/km
Fuel Cons . , £/100km
Hydrocarbons ,
Carbon Monoxide,
Oxides of Nitrogen,
g/km
g/km
g/km
FTP
739.9
10.9
24.4
338.6
17.21
1.59
38.84
0.46
NYCC
739.9
7.9
25.0
725.6
31.60
0.40
8.62
1.66
Tests TSIT FTM
FSC 2500 IDLE 52 MPH 25 MPH IDLE
739.9
8.3
25.6
300.9
12.98
0.12 ppmH* 178 406 157 237 429
1.90 % 2.5 3.9 1.9 3.6 4.3
1.92 ppm 120 7 470 86 6
512-2 12 Pet. Misfire
FTP
NYCC
FSC
*d
I
co
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons.,
Hydrocarbons ,
Carbon Monoxide,
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
g/km
5,/lOOkm
g/km
g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
744.2
11.8
23.9
368.9
16.58
1.82
8.86
0.61
744.2
11.8
23.9
723.9
31.32
0.55
5.16
1.98
744.2
12.3
21.1
306.2
13.08
0.04
0.15
1.18
ppmH*
ppm
2500
IDLE
69
<0.01
150
115
0.09
1
52 MPH 25 MPH
81
<0.01
850
75
<0.01
100
IDLE
74
0.03
2
*ppmH - Hydrocarbons as ppm Hexane measured using an Infrared Emission Analyzer
_ Light Duty Federal Test Procedure
NYCC - New York City Cycle
FSC - Federal Short Cycle
TSIT - Two Speed Idle Test
FTM - Federal Three Mode
-------
TABLE F-2. CAR 51 - SHORT TEST REPEATS
Steady-State Raw Emissions Tests
TSIT
Unmodified
Hydrocarbons, ppmH*
Carbon Monoxide , %
Oxides of Nitrogen, ppm
511-2 Disabled 0? Sensor
Hydrocarbons , ppmH*
Carbon Monoxide , %
Oxides of Nitrogen, ppm
512-2 12 Pet. Misfire
Hydrocarbons , ppmH*
Carbon Monoxide , %
Oxides of Nitrogen, ppm
513-2 Disabled EGR and Air
Hydrocarbons , ppmH*
Carbon Monixide , %
Oxides of Nitrogen, ppm
514-2 Disconnected CTS
Hydrocarbons, ppmH*
Carbon Monoxide , %
Oxides of Nitrogen, ppm
2500
61
0.01
215
73
0.01
293
64
0.01
200
183
1.9
70
220
3.2
120
IDLE
63
0.01
27
363
3.9
5
175
0.13
1
355
3.4
5
310
3.9
12
52 MPH
63
<0.01
700
80
0.01
1788
74
<0.01
400
159
1.5
340
187
2.5
485
FTM
25 MPH
61
<0.01
185
75
0.01
425
66
<0.01
32
241
2.9
100
256
4.8
37
IDLE
64
<0.
40
382
4.
5
88
0.
2
382
3.
3
305
3.
12
01
1
05
6
7
* ppmH - Hydrocarbons as ppm Hexane measured using an Infrared Emission Analyzer
-------
APPENDIX G
AVERAGE VALUES FOR UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
-------
TABLE G-l. AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1979 Mercury Marquis with Three-Way Catalyst
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide,
Fue1 Cons.,
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Sulfate as % of TFS, %
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
PVM-ST
mm Hg
9/kg
°c
mg/km
%
>., °C
,., °c
g/km
100 km
AVG
51X-11
739.7
10.4
24.7
33.77
4.00
483.
568.
366.2
15.76
FTP
MIN
735.1
8.7
24.4
33.02
3.59
475.
563.
358.5
15.41
MAX
744.7
11.7
25.6
34.42
4.72
491.
572.
373.2
16.06
AVG
51X-12
739.5
10.1
26.4
25.33
3.70
554.
608.
276.3
11.82
SET
MIN
735.1
9.0
25.6
24.33
3.45
543.
606.
265.4
11.35
MAX
744.2
11.0
27.2
25.81
3.96
564.
610.
281.6
12.04
AVG
51X-13
739.5
10.0
26.6
22.33
3.09
593.
623.
243.9
10.42
HFET
MIN
735.1
9.1
25.6
21.89
2.93
591.
618.
239.2
10.21
MAX
744.7
11.8
27.2
22.69
3.39
594.
627.
247.8
10.59
0.13
1.63
0.83
2.01
0.85
0.84
2.6
69.1
0.21
0.00
5.05
0.31
0.11
1.35
0.76
1.35
0.22
0.22
0.0
60.7
0.14
0.00
2.24
0.00
0.14
1.77
0.92
4.67
1.69
1.69
6.4
75.2
0.31
0.01
8.51
0.74
0.03
0.35
0.77
18.43
12.36
16.36
2.0
24.4
0.11
0.01
—
0.03
0.20
0.72
13.66
8.16
10.55
0.8
22.2
0.01
0.00
—
0.03
0.48
0.85
23.39
16.21
22.21
4.1
26.3
0.27
0.01
—
0.01
0.05
0.83
48.33
27.14
40.76
0.6
9.0
0.04
0.01
—
0.01
0.01
0.78
42.84
0.00
0.00
0.2
7.4
0.01
0.00
—
0.01
0.11
0.95
53.71
40.93
62.33
2.3
10.4
0.06
0.02
—
0.00
0.00
24.12
0.00
0.00
21.45
0.00
0.00
29.65
0.00
0.00
10.65
0.00
0.00
8.38
0.00
0.00
13.81
0.00
0.00
5.51
0.00
0.00
4.92
0.00
0.00
6.11
-------
TABLE G-l (Cont'd).
AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1979 Mercury Marquis with Three-Way Catalyst
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except as Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Total Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Mononiethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
AVG
51X-11
2.41
0.11
0.01
0.08
0.00
0.00
2.6
1.9
45.56
4.69
4.63
1.58
0.63
1.90
4.65
5.45
69.1
54.3
0.13
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FTP
MIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
37.87
3.99
4.11
1.24
0.30
1.57
4.06
3.79
60.7
53.7
0.08
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
6.43
0.34
0.04
0.31
0.00
0.00
6.4
4.6
53.69
5.60
5.20
1.84
1.14
2.17
5.09
7.15
75.2
55.2
0.23
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
51X-12
1.76
0.19
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
2.0
6.7
21.00
0.58
1.76
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.83
0.19
24.4
81.3
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SET
MIN
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.8
2.7
19.84
0.42
1.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
22.2
74.0
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
4.12
0.58
0.10
0.11
0.00
0.00
4.1
13.7
22.85
0.73
2.04
0.00
0.11
0.00
1.93
0.40
26.3
87.7
0.05
0.07
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
AVG
51X-13
1.14
0.04
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
1.2
12.0
8.27
0.00
0.53
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.02
0.01
9.0
90.0
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
MIN
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.2
2.0
6.70
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.4
74.0
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
2.32
0.14
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
2.3
23.0
9.53
0.01
0.67
0.00
0.51
0.00
0.09
0.05
10.4
104.0
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE G-l (Cont'd). AVERAGE, MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM VALUES FOR THE UNMODIFIED CONFIGURATION
1979 Mercury Marquis with Three-Way Catalyst
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM (Except at Noted)
Test Number, PVM-ST
Other Elements
FTP
SET
AVG
MIN
MAX
AVG
MIN
MAX
HFET
AVG
MIN
MAX
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Arsenic
Mercury
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Sodium
Fluorine
Magnesium
Potassium
Chlorine
Platinum
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Iron
Vanadium
Titanium
Barium
Calcium
Cr
Pb
Mn
As
Hg
Br
P
Si
Cd
Al
S
Na
F
Mg
K
Cl
Pt
Zn
Cu
Ni
Fe
V
Ti
Ba
Ca
0.07 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02
0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.19 0.06 0.44 4.83 2.83 6.21 7.95 0.00 11.48
0.32 0.01 1.22 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02
0.12 0.04 0.18 0.04 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02
Note: Most values of 0.00 for Other Elements have been left blank.
-------
APPENDIX H
AVERAGE VALUES FOR ALL CONFIGURATIONS
-------
TABLE H-l. CAR 51 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND
THE MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH THREE-WAY CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test No. PVM
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °c
Catalyst Max. Temp., °c
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., 2,/l°° k™
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Aceta Idehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotona Idehyde
Hexana Idehyde
Unmod.
51
739.7
10.4
24.7
33.77
4.00
483.
568.
336.2
15.76
0.13
1.63
0.83
2.01
0.85
2.6
69.1
0.21
0.00
5.05
0.31
— —
0.00
0.00
24.12
2.41
0.11
0.01
0.08
0.00
—
0.00
Disabled
02 Sensor
511
740.2
10.4
24.7
33.19
3.73
562.*
661.*
361.0
15.49
0.11
0.96
2.51
5.84
1.30
0.4
64.6
0.61
0.00
3.39
0.13*
—
0.00
0.00
10.54
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.13
0.13
—
0.00
12% Misfire
& Air
512
743.9
11.6
23.6
35.19
0.97
616.
728.
365.3
16.42
1.73
8.91
0.60
10.01
0.13
1.0
322.9
0.18
0.04
30.93
1.57
—
0.59
0.00
11.93
0.91
0.66
0.00
0.28
0.00
__
0.00
Disabled
EGR S, Air
513
741.1
11.3
24.4
36.68
0.57
400.
466
340.6
17.12
1.49
35.45
0.55
5.80
0.17
2.9
486.6
0.13
0.05
172.38
69.94
—
0.35
0.00
87.88
1.27
0.41
0.15
1.10
0.00
__
0.00
Disc.
__CTS
514
745.7
9.5
22.8
39.61
0.28
436.*
527.
345.0
18.48
1.80
52.41
0.36
11.34
0.21
2.7*
721.9
0.34*
0.02
252.97
112.29
—
0.96
0.00
42.69
0.22
1.17
1.10
0.00*
0.09
0.00
Benzaldehyde
H-2
-------
TABLE H-l (Cont'd). CAR AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND
THE MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - FTP
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH THREE-WAY CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Notes)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Lead
Manganese
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Umnod.
45.56
4.69
4.63
1.58
0.63
1.90
4.65
5.45
0.13
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.01
0.19
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.01
0.01
Disabled
02 Sensor
47.67
3.97
1.96
1.57
0.36
1.72
2.42
4.87
0.17
0.14
0.20
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.02
0.01
12% Misfire
& Air
43.73
18.33
5.24
2.47
1.16
11.49
125.43
115.06
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0,02
0.04
2.26
0.01
0.02
0.50
0.02
0.01
Disabled
EGR & Air
102.80
127.51
17.23
3.15
0.44
53.92
77.98
103.54
0.06
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.53
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.53
0.02
0.03
Disc.
CTS
139.75
185.57
18.95
3.27
2.56
76.02
104.69
191.12
0.11*
0.06*
0.14*
0.03*
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.06
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.25
0.03
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
H-3
-------
TABLE H-2. CAR 51 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND
THE MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH THREE-WAY CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
Test No. PVM
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °c
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
I sobutyraldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotona Idehyde
Hexanaldehyde
Unmod .
51
739.5
10.1
26.4
25.33
3.70
554.
608.
276.3
11.82
0.03
0.35
0.77
18.84
12.36
2.0
24.4
0.11
0.01
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
10.65
1.76
0.19
0.03
0.03
0.00
—
0.00
Disabled
02 Sensor
511
740.4
10.8
25.6
24.94
3.89
617.*
715.*
272.1
11.64
0.04
0.23
2.70
4.13
2.11
0.2
27.0
0.28
0.00
—
—
—
0.12
0.00
7.97
0.03
0.14
0.00
0.05
0.07
—
0.00
12% Misfire
& Air
512
743.9
12.1
25.0
25.31
0.58
725.
784.
271.0
11.81
0.35
2.93
0.44
3.75
0.06
0.6
93.9
0.04
0.01
—
—
—
0.51
0.00
4.80
0.12
0.21
0.00
0.23
0.00
—
0.00
Disabled
EGR & Air
513
741.1
9.5
24.4
26.72
0.36
516.
591.
272.7
12.47
0.45*
11.45*
0.75*
5.75
0.13
0.7
195.6
0.03
0.02
—
—
—
0.71
0.00
37.34
0.63
0.16
0.08
0.18
0.00
—
0.00
Disc.
CTS
514
746.3
7.9
23.4
27.87
0.22
521.
599.
244.7
13.00
1.05
36.06
0.26
5.49
0.11
0.6
463.2
0.15
0.01
™» — •
•-•.
—
2.00
o.oo
17.12
0.01
0.36
0.23
0.00
0.00
— _
o.oo
BenzaIdehyde
H-4
-------
TABLE H-2 (Cont'd). CAR 51 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND
THE MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - SET
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH THREE-WAY CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Lead
Manganese
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Unmod.
21.00
0.58
1.76
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.83
0.19
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
4.83
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.01
Disabled
02 Sensor
23.71
1.08
0.88
0.00
0.02
0.17
0.56
0.53
0.15
0.14
0.00
o.oo
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.01
0.01
12% Misfire
& Air
13.70
6.30
2.34
0.00
0.63
6.00
48.95
15.94
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.78
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.01
0.00
Disabled
EGR & Air
45.74
41.28
8.87
0.00
0.78
19.75
41.29
37.84
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.94
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.01
Disc.
CTS
84.19
111.62
12.65
0.00
1.24
52.18
79.33
122.02
0.09
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,08
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.01
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
H-5
-------
TABLE H-3. CAR 51 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED AND
THE MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH THREE-WAY CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
•
Test No. PVM
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/kg
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °c
Catalyst Max. Temp., °c
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC) , g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Sulfate
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
DMNA
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nickel Carbonyl
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
I sobutyra Idehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Crotonaldehyde
Hexana Idehyde
Unmod.
51
739.5
10.0
26.6
22.33
3.09
593.
623.
243.9
10.42
0.01
0.05
0.83
48.43
27.14
0.6
9.0
0.04
0.01
— -
—
—
0.00
0.00
5.51
1.14
0.04
0.00
0.05
0.00
— -
0.00
Disabled
02 Sensor
511
740.8
9.9
27.5
20.99
1.35
606.*
636.*
229.4
9.80
0.01
0.05
1.28
9.93
5.19
0.1
8.72
0.81
0.00
__
—
—
0.00
0.00
4.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
—
0.00
12% Misfire
& Air
512
743.9
11.5
24.8
22.93
0.30
774.
790.
248.9
10.70
0.10
1.00
0.42
0.89
0.07
1.3
29.4
0.06
0.02
__
—
—
0.13
0.00
2.44
0.22
0.13
0.00
0.90
0.00
—
0.00
Disabled
EGR & Air
513
742.6
9.3
25.0
24.20
0.25
631.
644.
263.2
11.30
0.08
0.76
0.97
2.11
0.14
0.9
27.4
0.03
0.01
__
__
—
0.40
0.00
7.61
0.38
0.08
0.16
0.20
0.00
—
0.00
Disc.
CTS
514
746.3
8.0
23.9
25.65
0.08
578.
616.
226.8
11.97
0.85
32.41
0.21
2.57
0.06
1.0
383.2
0.20
0.02
—
3.18
0.00
8.88
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.95
o.oo
0.00
BenzaIdehyde
H-6
-------
TABLE H-3 (Cont'd). CAR 51 AVERAGE RESULTS FOR THE UNMODIFIED
AND THE MALFUNCTION CONFIGURATIONS - HFET
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS WITH THREE-WAY CATALYST
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Other Elements
Lead
Manganese
Bromine
Phosphorus
Silicon
Cadmium
Aluminum
Sulfur
Chlorine
Zinc
Copper
Iron
Barium
Calcium
Disabled 12% Misfire
Unmod.
8.27
0.00
0.53
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
7.95
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
02 Sensor
10.09
0.04
0.81
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.22
0.10
0.26
0.26
0.05
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01*
0.05*
0.41*
0.00
0.00
0.08*
0.01*
0.00
& Air
4.21
3.41
1.19
0.00
0.20
3.66
13.88
2.79
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.65
0.00
0,00
0.05
0.01
0.00
Disabled
EGR & Air
8.38
2.61
2.19
0.00
0.00
2.09
8.06
4.06
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.01
0.01
Disc.
CTS
72.13
93.53
11.77
0.00
1.05
47.34
68.86
88.55
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
*Validity of the average value given is questionable.
H-7
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Infractions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-460/3-80-005
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
4. TITLE ANDSUBTITLE
Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from a
Malfunctioning Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline
Automobile
.REPORT DATE
January 1980
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
11-5402
. AUTHOR(S)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
Charles M. Urban
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-2692
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Mobile Souce Air Pollution Control
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48102
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report 8/78-11/79
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRAUI ^ ~ • •
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions from a current model three-way catalyst-
equxppea gasoline automobile operating under malfunction conditions. One
automoDile was evaluat-pri rvirov- +-i-.v-^~ j~.- • , - ,
three driving schedules in the unmodified
°°"F^!ara^0n andT^ f°Ur engine and/or emission control system malfunction
configurations Exhaust emission constituents measured, in addition to the
currently regulated emissions, include: particulates, sulfates, aldehydes,
sulfides amines, metals and several additional elements and compounds.
Additional evaluations, in each of the configurations, involved the measure-
ment of the regulated emissions over four short-test procedures
17.
a.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
D.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Air Pollution
Catalytic Converters
Exhaust Emissions
Gasoline Engines
Motor Vehicles
Emissions Characterizatio
Emission Test Procedures
Light-Duty Vehicles
COSATI Field/Group
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
165
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
INSTRUCTIONS
1. REPORT NUMBER
Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.
2. LEAVE BLANK
3. RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
Reserved for use by each report recipient.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
number and include subtitle for the specific title.
5. REPORT DATE
Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue date of
approval, date of preparation, etc.).
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
Leave blank.
7. AUTHOR(S)
Give name(s) in conventional order (John R, Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.). List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
zation.
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Include ZIP code.
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
Leave blank.
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as: Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of. Presented at conference nf
To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc. vmwciu* 01,
16. ABSTRACT
Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report If the reoort contain. <•
significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here. *^ «•«««» a
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
(a) DESCRIPTORS • Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the m.inr
concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging. J
(b) IDENTIFIERS AMI(OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators etc Use ooen-
ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exist*. ' ' *^
(c) COSATI FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List Since the ma
jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
the primary posting(s). «uuw
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Denote reusability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite anv availability tn
the public, with address and price. y «»»uauuny 10
19. & 20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.
21. NUMBER OF PAGES
Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.
22. PRICE
Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
CPA Form 2220-1 (t-73) (R«v«rM)
^
------- |