United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory
PO Box 15027
Las Vegas NV 89114
EPA-600 3 79-120
December 1979
Research and Development
&EPA
Distribution of
Phytoplankton in
Utah Lakes
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, US Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad categories
were established to facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously planned to foster
technology transfer and maximum interface in related fields. The nine series are:
1 Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy—Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans,plant and animal species, and
materials. Problems are assessed for their long-and short-term influences. Investiga-
tions include formations, transport, and pathway studies to determine the fate of
pollutants and their effects. This work provided the technical basis for setting standards
to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the aquatic, terrestrial, and
atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161
-------
EP,,-600/3-79-120
December 1979
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN UTAH LAKES
by
L. R. Williams, S. C. Hern, V. W. Lambou,
F. A. Morris*, M. K. Morris*, and W. D. Taylor
Water and Land Quality Branch
Monitoring Operations Division
Fnvironmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
*Department of Biological Sciences
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89114
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory-Las Vegas, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does
not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
Protection of the environment requires effective regulatory actions
which are based on sound technical and scientific information. This
information must include the quantitative description and linking of
pollutant sources, transport mechanisms, interactions, and resulting effects
on man and his environment. Because of the complexities involved, assessment
of specific pollutants in the environment requires a total systems approach
which transcends the media of air, water, and land. The Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas contributes to the formation and
enhancement of a sound monitoring data base for exposure assessment through
programs designed to:
• develop and optimize systems and strategies for monitoring
pollutants and their impact on the environment
•demonstrate new monitoring systems and technologies by
applying them to fulfill special monitoring needs of the
Agency's operating programs
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
25 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
Utah, along with results from the calculation of several commonly used
biological indices of water quality and community structure. These data can
be used to biologically characterize the study lakes, and as baseline data
for future investigations. This report was written for use by Federal,
State, and local governmental agencies concerned with water quality analysis,
monitoring, and/or regulation. Private industry and individuals similarly
involved with the biological aspects of water quality will find the document
useful. For further information contact the Water and Land Quality Branch,
Monitoring Operations Division.
IH'
George^B. Morgan
^ Director
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas
n i
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword iii
.Introduction 1
Materials and Methods 3
Lake and Site Selection 3
Sample Preparation 3
Examination 4
Quality Control 5
Results 6
Nygaard's Trophic State Indices 6
Palmer's Organic Pollution Indices 6
Species Diversity and Abundance Indices 8
Species Occurrence and Abundance 10
Literature Cited 11
Appendix A. Phytoplankton Species list for the State
of Utah 12
Appendix B. Summary of Phytoplankton Data 15
-------
INTRODUCTION;
The collection and analysis of phytoplankton data were included in the
National Eutrophication Survey in an effort to determine relationships 'between
algal characteristics and trophic status of individual lakes.
During sprinn, summer, and fall of 1975, the Survey sampled 156 lakes in
11 States. Over 450 algal species and varieties were identified and
enumerated from .the 430 water samples examined.
This report presents the species and, abundance of phytoplankton in the
25 lakes sampled in the State of Utah (Table 1). the .Nygaard's Trophic
State (Nygaard 1949), Palmer's Organic Pollution (Palmer 1969), and species
diversity and abundance indices .are also included.
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE 'STATE OF UTAH
STORET No.
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
Lake Name
Rear Lake
Lower Bown1 s , Reservoir
Deer Creek Reservoir
Echo Reservoir
Lynn Reservoir
Fish Lake
Huntington North
Reservoir
Joe's Valley Reservoir
Minersville Reservoir
Moon Lake
Navajo Lake
Newcastle Reservoir
County
Rich (Bear Lake
in Idaho)
Garfield
Wasatch
Summit
Box Elder
Seiver
Emery
Emery
Beaver
Duchesne
Kane
Iron
i (Continued)
-------
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF UTAH (Continued)
STORE! No.
4913
4914
4915
4916
4917
4918
4919
4920
4921
4922
4923
4924
4925
Lake Name
Otter Creek Reservoir
Panquitch Lake
Pel ican Lake
Pineview Reservoir
Pi ute Reservior
Porcupine Reservoir
Pruess (Garrison)
Reservoir
Sevier Bridge Reservoir
Starvation Reservoir
Steinaker Reservoir
Tropic Reservoir
Utah Lake
Willard Bay Reservoir
County
Pi ute
Garfield
Uintah
Weber
.Piute
Cache
Mi. Hard
Sanpete, Jua'h
Duchesne
Uintah
Garfield
Utah
Box Elder
-------
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LAKE AND SITE SELECTION
Lakes and reservoirs included in the Survey were selected through
discussions with State water pollution agency personnel and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Regional Offices (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1975). Screening and selection strongly emphasized lakes with actual or
potential accelerated eutrophication problems. As a result, the selection was
limited to lakes:
(1) impacted by one or more municipal sewage treatment plant outfalls
either directly into the lake or by discharge to an inlet tributary
within approximately 40 kilometers of the lake;
(2) 40 hectares or larger in size; and
(3) with a mean hydraulic retention time of at least 30 days.
Specific selection criteria were waived for some lakes of particular State
interest.
Sampling sitas for a lake were selected based on available information on
lake morphometry, potential major sources of nutrient input, and on-site
judgment of the field limnologist (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1975).
Primary sampling sites were chosen to reflect the deepest portion of each
major basin in a test lake. Where many basins were present, selection was
guided by nutrient source information on hand. At each sampling site, a
depth-integrated phytoplankton sample was taken. Depth-integrated samples
were uniform mixtures of water from the surface to a depth of 15 feet
(4.6 meters) or from the surface to the lower limit of the photic zone
representing 1 percent of the incident light, whichever was greater. If the
depth at the sampling site was less than 15 feet (4.6 meters), the sample was
taken from just off the bottom to the surface. Normally, a lake was sampled
three times in 1 year, providing information on spring, summer, and fall
conditions.
SAMPLE PREPARATION
To preserve the sample 4 milliliters (ml) of Acid-Lugo!'s solution
(Prescott 1970) were added to each 130-ml sample from each site at the time of
collection. The samples were shipped to the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, where equal volumes from each site
-------
were mixed to form two 130-ml composite samples for a given lake. One
composite sample was put into storage and the other was used for the
examination.
Prior to examination, the composite samples were concentrated by the
settling method. Solids were allowed to settle for at least 24 hours prior to
siphoning off the supernate. The volume of the removed supernate and the
volume of the remaining concentrate were measured and concentrations
determined. A small (8-rnl) library subsample of the concentrate was then
taken. The remaining concentrate was gently agitated to resuspend the
plankton and poured into a capped, graduated test tube. If a preliminary
examination of a sample indicated the need for a more concentrated sample, the
contents of the test tube were further concentrated by repeating the settling
method. Final concentrations varied from 15 to 40 times the original.
Permanent slides were prepared from concentrated samples after analysis
was complete. A ring of clear Karo^ corn syrup with phenol (a few crystals of
phenol were added to each 100 ml of syrup) was placed on a glass slide. A
drop of superconcentratefront the bottom of the test tube was placed in the
ring. This solution was thoroughly mixed and topped with a coverglass. After
the syrup at the edges of the coverglass had hardened, the excess was scraped
away and the mount was sealed with clear fingernail polish. Permanent diatom
slides were prepared by drying sample material on a coverglass, heating in a
muffle furnace at 400° C for 45 minutes, and mounting in Hyrax®. Finally, the
mounts were sealed with clear fingernail polish.
Backup samples, library samples, permanent sample slides, and
Hyrax^mounted diatom slides are being stored and maintained at the
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas.
EXAMINATION
The phytoplankton samples were examined with the aid of binocular
compound microscopes. A preliminary examination was performed to precisely
identify and list all forms encountered. The length of this examination
varied depending on the complexity of the sample. An attempt was made to find
and identify all of the forms present in each sample. Often forms were
observed which could not be identified to species or to genus. Abbreviated
descriptions were used to keep a record of these forms (e.g., lunate cell,
blue-green filament, Navicula #1). Diatom slides were examined using a
standard light microscope. If greater resolution was essential to accurately
identify the diatoms, a phase-contrast microscope was used.
After the species list was compiled, phytoplankton were enumerated using
a Neubauer Counting Chamber with a 40X objective lens and a 10X ocular lens.
All forms within each field were counted. The count was continued until a
minimum of 100 fields had been viewed, or until the dominant form had been
observed a minimum of 100 times.
^Registered trademark
-------
QUALITY CONTROL
Project phycologists performed internal quality control intercomparisons
regularly on 7 percent of the species identification and counts. Although an
individual had primary responsibility for analyzing a sample, taxonomic
problems were discussed among the phycologists.
Additional quality control checks were performed on the Survey samples by
Dr. G. W. Prescott of the University of Montana at the rate of 5 percent.
Quality control checks were made on 75 percent of these samples to verify
species identifications while checks were made on the remaining 25 percent of
the samples to verify genus counts. Presently, the agreement between quality
control checks for species identification and genus enumerations is
sati sfactory.
-------
RESULTS
A phytoplankton species list for the State is presented in Appendix A.
Appendix B summarizes all of the phytoplankton data collected from the State
by the Survey. The latter is organized by lake, and includes an alphabetical
phytoplankton species list with concentrations for individual species given by
sampling date. Results from the application of several indices are presented
(Nygaard's Trophic State, Palmer's Organic Pollution, and species diversity
and abundance). Each lake has been assigned a four-digit STORET number.
(STORET (STOrage and RETrieval) is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
computer system which processes and maintains water quality data.] The first
two digits of the STORET number identify the State; the last two digits
identify the lake.
NYGAARD'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES
Five indices devised by Nygaard (1949) were proposed under the assumption
that certain algal groups are indicative of levels of nutrient enrichment.
These indices were calculated in order to aid in determining the surveyed
lakes' trophic status. As a general rule, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, centric
diatoms, and members of the Chlorococcales are found in waters that are
eutrophic (rich in nutrients), while desmids and many pennate diatoms
generally cannot tolerate high nutrient levels and so are found in
oligotrophic waters (poor in nutrients).
In applying the indices to the Survey data, the number of taxa in each
major group was determined from the species list for each sample. The ratios
of these groups give numerical values which can be used as a biological index
of water richness. The five indices and the ranges of values established for
Danish lakes by Nygaard for each trophic state are presented in Table 2. The
appropriate symbol, (E) eutrophic and (0) oligotrophic, follows each
calculated value in the tables in Appendix B. A question mark (?) following a
calculated value in these tables was entered when that value was within the
range of both classifications.
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
Palmer (1969) analyzed reports from 165 authors and developed algal
pollution indices for use in rating water samples with high organic pollution.
Two lists of organic-pollution-tolerant forms were prepared, one containing
20 genera, the other, 20 species (Tables 3 and 4). Each form was assigned a
pollution index number ranging from 1 for moderately tolerant forms to 6 for
-------
TABLE 2. NYGAARD'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES ADAPTED FROM HUTCHINSON (1967)
Index
Calculation
Eutrophic
Myxophycean
Chlorophycean
Diatom
Euglenophyte
Compound
Myxophyceae
Desmideae
Chlorococcales
Desmideae
Centric Diatoms
Pennate Diatoms
Euglenophyta
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales +
Centric Diatoms + Euglenophyta
Desmideae
0.0-0.4
0.0-0.7
0.0-0.3
0.0-0.2
0.0-1.0
0.1-3.0
0.2-9.0
0.0-1.75
0.0-1.0
1.2-25
TABLE 3. ALGAL GENUS POLLUTION INDEX
(Palmer 1969)
TABLE 4. ALGAL SPECIES POLLUTION
INDEX (Palmer 1969)
Genus
Anacystis
Anki strodesmus
Chlamydomonas
Chlorella
Closterium
Cyclotella
£uglena
Gomphonema
Lj^pcinclis
Melosira
Micracti ni urn
Navicula
Nitzschia
Oscillatoria
Pandorina
Phacus
Phormidium
Scenedesmus
Stigeoclonium
Synedra
Pol lution
Index
1
2
4
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
3
3
5
1
2
1
4
2
2
Species
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Arthrospira jenneri
Chlorella vulgaris
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Euglena gracilis
Euglena viridis
Gomphonema parvulum
Melosira varians
Navicula cryptocephala
Nitzschia acicularis
Nitzschia palea
Oscillatoria chlorina
Oscillatoria limosa
Oscillatoria princeps
Oscillatoria j)utrida
Oscillatoria tenuis
Pandorina morum
Scenedesmus quadricauda
Stigeoclonium tenue
Synedra ulna
Pol lution
Index
3
2
2
2
1
6
1
2
1
1
5
2
4
1
1
4
3
4
3
3
-------
extremely tolerant forms. Palmer based the index numbers on occurrence
records and/or where emphasized by the authors as being especially tolerant of
organic pollution.
In analyzing a water sample, any of the 20 genera or species of algae
present in concentrations of 50 per milliliter or more are recorded. The
pollution index numbers of the algae present are totaled, providing a genus
score and a species score. Palmer determined that a score of 20 or more for
either index can be taken as evidence of high organic pollution, while a score
of 15 to 19 is taken as probable evidence of high organic pollution. Lower
figures suggest that the organic pollution of the sample is not high, that the
sample is not representative, or that some substance or factor interfering
with algal persistence is present and active.
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
"Information content" of biological samples is being used commonly by
biologists as a measure of diversity. Diversity in this connection means the
degree of uncertainty attached to the specific identity of any randomly
selected individual. The greater the number of taxa and the more equal their
proportions, the greater the uncertainty, and hence, the diversity (Pielou
1966). There are several methods of measuring diversity, e.g., the formulas
given by Brillouin (1962) and Shannon and Weaver (1963). The method which is
appropriate depends on the type of biological sample on hand.
Pielou (1966) classifies the types of biological samples and gives the
measure of diversity appropriate for each type. The Survey phytoplankton
samples are what she classifies as larger samples (collections in Pielou' s
terminology) from which random subsamples can be drawn. According to Pielou,
the average diversity per individual (H) for these types of samples can be
estimated from the Shannon-Wiener formula (Shannon and Weaver 1963):
where P is the proportion of the ith taxon in the sample, which is calculated
from n-j/N; n-j is the number of individuals per milliliter of the ith
taxon; N is the total number of individuals per ml; and S is the total number
of taxa. However, Basharin (1959) and Pielou (1966) have pointed out that H
calculated from the subsample is a biased estimator of the sample H, and if
this bias is to be accounted for, we must know the total number of taxa
present in the sample since the magnitude of this bias depends on it.
Pielou (1966) suggests that if the number of taxa in the subsample falls
only slightly short of the number in the larger sample, no appreciable error
will result in considering S, estimated from the subsample, as being equal to
the sample value. Even though considerable effort was made to find and
identify all taxa, the Survey samples undoubtedly contain a fair number of
rare phytoplankton taxa which were not encountered.
-------
In the Shannon-Wiener formula, an increase in the number of taxa and/or
an increase in the evenness of the distribution of individuals among taxa will
increase the average diversity per individual from its minimal value of zero.
Sager and Hasler (1969) found that the richness of taxa was of minor
importance in determination of average diversity per individual for
phytoplankton and they concluded that phytoplankton taxa in excess of the 10
to 15 most abundant ones have little effect on H. This was verified by our
own calculations. Our counts are in number per milliliter and since
logarithms to the base 2 were used in our calculations, H is expressed in
units of bits per individual. When individuals of a taxon were so rare that
they were not counted, a value of 1/130 per milliliter or 0.008 per milliliter
was used in the calculations since at least one individual of the taxon must
have been present in the collection.
A Survey sample for a given lake represents a composite of all
phytoplankton collected at different sampling sites on the lake during a given
sampling period. Since the number of samples (M) making up a composite is a
function of both the complexity of the lake sampled arid its size, it should
affect the richness-of-taxa component of the diversity of our phytoplankton
collections. The maximum diversity (MaxH) (i.e., when the individuals are
distributed among the taxa as evenly as possible) was estimated from Iog2 S
(Pielou 1966), while the minimum diversity (MinH), was estimated from the
formula:
MinH - -V'°^- "~V-yl 1092 N-Y-^1
given by Zand (1976). The total diversity (D) was calculated from HN (Pielou
1966). Also given in Appendix B are L (the mean number of individuals per
taxa per milliliter) and K (the number of individuals per milliliter of the
most abundant taxon in the sample).
The evenness component of diversity (J) was estimated from H/MaxH
(Pielou 1966). Relative evenness (RJ) was calculated from the formula:
H - M i n H
Ma7H~-MTnH
given by Zand (1976). Zand suggests that RJ be used as a substitute for both
J and the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris (1968). As pointed
out by Zand, the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris does not
properly express what it is intended to show, i.e., the position of H in the
range between MaxH and MinH. RJ may range from 0 to 1; being 1 for the most
even samples and 0 for the least even samples.
Zand (1976) suggests that diversity indices be expressed in units of
"sits", i.e., in logarithms to base S (where S is the total number of taxa in
the sample) instead of in "bits", i.e., in logarithms to base 2. Zand points
out that the diversity index in sits per individual is a normalized number
ranging from 1 for the most evenly distributed samples to 0 for the least
evenly distributed samples. Also, it can be used to compare different
samples, independent of the number of taxa in each. The diversity in bits per
-------
individual should not be used in direct comparisons involving various samples
which have different numbers of taxa. Since MaxH equals log S, the expression
in sits is equal to 1095 S, or 1. Therefore diversity in sits per
individual is numerically equivalent to J, the evenness component for the
Shannon-Wiener formula.
SPECIES OCCURRENCE AND ABUNDANCE
The alphabetic phytoplankton species list for each lake, presented in
Appendix B, gives the concentrations of individual species by sampling date.
Concentrations are in cells, colonies, or filaments (CEL, COL, FIL) per
millilHer. An "X" after a species name indicates that the species identified
in the preliminary examination was in such a low concentration that it did not
appear in the count. A blank space indicates that the organism was not found
in the sample collected on that date. Column S is used to designate the
examiner's subjective opinion of the five dominant taxa in a sample, based
upon relative size and concentration of the organism. The percent column (%C)
presents, by abundance, the percentage composition of each taxon.
10
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Basharin, G. P. 1959. On a statistical estimate for the entrop/ Of a
sequence of independent random variables, pp. 333-336. _In: Theory of
Probability and Its Applications (translation of "Teoriya Veroyatnosei i
ee Prameneniya"). N. Artin (ed). 4. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Brillouin, L. 1962. Science and Information Theory (2nd ed.). Academic
Press, New York. 351 pp.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. II. Introduction to Lake
Biology and the Llmnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Mew York.
1,115 pp.
Nygaard, G. 1949. HydrobiologicaI studies of some Danish poncfs and lakes.
II. (K danske Vidensk. Selsk.) Biol. Sci. 7:293.
Palmer, C. M. 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic
pollution. J. Phycol. 5:78-82.
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of
biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13:131-144.
Prescott, G. W. 1970. How to Know the Freshwater Algae. William C. Brown
Company, Dubuque. 348 pp.
Sager, P. E., and A. D. Hasler. 1969. Species diversity in lacustrine
p'hytoplankton. I. The components of the index of diversity
from Shannon's formula. Amer. Natur. 103(929):51-59.
Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Commu-
nication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 117 pp.
U S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophication Survey
Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Corvallis Environmental
Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. 91 pp.
Wilhm, V. L., and T. C. Dorris. 1968. Biological parameters for water
quality'criteria. Bio-Science. 18:477.
Zand S M 1976 Indexes associated with information theory in water
'quality. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed. 48(8):2026-2031.
11
-------
APPENDIX A
PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES LIST FOR THE STATE OF UTAH
12
-------
Achnanthes mierocephala
Aohncmthes minutissima
Aotinastnan gracilimum
Anabaena planetonica
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
v. acicularis
Aphanisomenon flos-aquae
Aphanocapsa delicatissima
Aphanothece
Asterionella formosa
Botryocoocus braunii
C alone is
Carteria
Ceratium hirundinella
Ceratium hirundinella
f. furcoid.es
Ceratium hirundinella
f. scotticum
Chaetoeeros eImoreI
Chlamydomonas
Chlorogonium
Chrooeoacus
Closteriim
Cocconeis placentula
Coelastrum microponm
Coelosphaerium kuetzingianum
Coelosrjhaer>iim naegelianum
Cosmo riwn
Crueigenia rectangularis
Crucigenia tetrapedia
Cryptomonas erosa
Cryptamonas erosa
v. reflexa
Cryptamonas marssonii
Cryptomonas ovata
Cryptomonas reflexa
Cyclotella comta
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Cymatopleura solea
Cymbella
Dactylocoeeopsis fascicularis
Daotylocoocopsis irregularis
Diatoma tenue
V. elongatum
Diatoma vulgare
Diatoma vulgare
V. breve
Diatoma vulgare
v. linearis
Dictyosphaerium pulahellum
Dinobryon divergens
Dinobryon sertularia
Dinobryon sociale
Dinobryon sociale
v• ame ricanum
Diploneis smithii
Diplopsalis acuta
Eldkatothrix gelatinosa
Elakatothrix viridis
Entomoneis
Epithemia sorex
Epithemia turgida
Eudorina elegans
Euglena acus
Euglena ehrenbergii
Euglena gracilis
Euglena oxyuris
v. minor
Eunotia curvata
Fragilaria capucina
v. mesolepta
Fragilaria crotonensis
Fragilaria intermedia
Fragilaria leptostauron
Franceia oval is
Glenodiniwn edax
Glenodiniim oculatum
Gloeocapsa
Gloeotrichia
Gomphonema acuminatwn
Gomphonema gracile
Gomphonema parvulum
Gomphonema truncation
Gymnodiniian albulum
Gyrosigma kutzingii
Hannaea arcus
Eantzschia
Kirchneriella
Lagerheimia ciliata
Lagerheimia longiseta
v. major
Lagerheimia quadriseta
Lyngbya contorta
Mallomonas acaroides
Mallomonas pseudocoronata
Melosira distans
Melosira granulata
Melosira granulata
v. angustissima
Melosira varians
Meridian circulars
13
-------
Merismopedia tenuissima
Microcystis aeruginosa
Miaroaystis inaerta
Mougeotia
Navicula cryptoaephala
Navieula tripunotata
Nitssshia longissima
Nitzsehia longissima
v. reve rsa
Nitzsehia vermioularis
Oedoganiwn
Ooeystis eremosp'haeria
Oscillatoria lirmetica
Pandorina morum
Pediastrwn boryanum
Pedicts-trim duplex
Pediastntm duplex
v. alathratm
Pediastrwn integrum
Pediastrwn simplex
Peridinium einctum
Peridinium incanspicuum
Peridinum willei
Phaaus megalopsis
Phaaus tortus
Phormidium muaisola
Pinnulari-a
Pleuroeigma delieatulum
Pter'cmonas angulosa
Quadr-igula ehodatii
Rhoieosphenia curvata
Khopalodia gibba
Seenedesmus aeuminatus
Seenedesmus arouatus
Soenedesmus balatoniaus
Seenedesmus
Seenedesmus
Scenedesmus
Soenedesmus
Scenedesmus
Schroederia
Skeletonema
Sphaeroeyst
bicaudatus
bijuga
dimorphus
opoliensis
quadrieauda
setigera
potamos
is schroeteri
Spondylosium planum
Staurastrum
Stephanodiscus niagarae
Surirella ovata
Synedra acus
Synedra delicatissima
V. angustissima
Synedrvi ulna
Synedm ulna
V. impressa
Synura uvella
Tabellaria fenestrata
Tetraedron aaudatum
Tetraedran graoile
Tetraedrcn minimum
Tetraedrcn minimum
v. scrobiculatum
Tetraedran mutiaum
Tetraedrcn regulare
V . incus
Tet rostrum glabnim
Tetrastrum staurogeniaeforme
Traehelomanas orebea
Trashelamonas fluviatilis
Tradhelamonas granulosa
Treubaria setigerum
Treubaria triappendisulata
Ulothrix
14
-------
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF PHYTOPLANKTON DATA
This appendix was generated by computer. Because it was only possible to
use upper case letters in the printout, all scientific names are printed in
upper case and are not italicized.
The alphabetic phytoplankton lists include taxa without species names
(e.g., EUNOTIA, EUNOTIAtfl, FLAGELLATE, FLAGELLATES, MICROCYSTIS INCERTA 9,
CHLOROPHYTAN COCCOID CELLED COLONY). When species determinations were not
possible, symbols or descriptive phrases were used to separate taxa for
enumeration purposes. Each name on a list, however, represents a unique
species different from any other name on the same list, unless otherwise
noted, for counting purposes.
Numbers were used to separate unidentified species of the same genus. A
generic name listed alone is also a unique species. A question mark (9) is
placed immediately after the portion of a name which was assigned with
uncertainty. Numbered, questioned, or otherwise designated taxa were
established on a lake-by-lake basis; therefore NAVICULA #2 from lake A cannot
be compared to NAVICULA #2 from lake B. Pluralized categories (e.g.,
FLAGELLATES, CENTRIC DIATOMS, SPP.) were used for counting purposes when taxa
could not be properly differentiated on the counting chamber.
15
-------
LAKE NAME I BEAR LAKE
STUHET NUMBER! 49U1
NY<;AABI) T«O»HIC STATE INDICES
DATS 09 14 75 09 OS 75 09 19 7S
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCJAN
E'JGLSNOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
03/0 E
0/03 ?
0/0 ?
03/0 E
oi/o e
03/0 E
0/04 ?
0.50 E
05/0 E
01/0 G
04/0 E
0/05 ?
0/01 T
05/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 14 75 08 06 75 09 19 75
GENUS
SPECIEd
02
03
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER Of TAXA
NUMBER OP SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF* INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIQUALS/XAXA
NUMBIR/ML Or MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 14 75 08 OS 75 09 19 75
H
8
M
XH
NH
0
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.30
4.00
7,00
2.00
0.03
317.70
1054.00
0.15
0.14
264.75
1003.00
1.92
8.00
7.00
3.00
0.23
849.12
286.00
0.64
0.62
35.75
95.00
1.99
8.00
7.00
3.00
0.12
1757.68
632.00
0.66
0.65
79.00
181.00
16
-------
LAKE NAME I BE** L*Kf
STODET NUMKtm 4401
T»X»
MKISTHODIJKUS
CHROOMON»» T
CKTPTOMOIUS
CrMBELL*
DINORRTDN OIVmtNg
EUMTOTHRIX VIRIDIS
CONTINUED
09 14 75
C»
75
KIRCHNERlEILk T
LACCPHEIMI* OU»DPI«rT»
L(NCB<* CONTOOT*
MILOSIR*
OOCTOTI8
TRTRHEDRON MINIMUM
OttM
CEL
CtL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
TIL
CEL
CtL
f IL
CEL
S
1
1
%c
94.7
S.I
ALGAL
UNITS
_PER ML
~~Iooj~~
5«
II
X
ALGAL 1 AIGAL
UNITS 1 UNITS
8 %C PER ML IS »C PER ML
II 1 1 1 X
1 1 I4I2I.4I 115
2116.81 4« 1 1 1
II XIII
II 1 1 1 X
1 1 11121, (1 US
II 1 1 1 X
II XIII
4131.21 95 1 1 1
III). 21 9» 1 1 1 It
1 1 11121.41 1*1
1 1 XII 1
1 1 11121. M 1*1
I1IU.CI 41 1 1 t
II 1 III 1
1099
632
17
-------
LAKl NAKIEl LDKFR BONN'S Ht'S.
STOKET NUMBERt 4902
DATE
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOPOPHYCEAH
DIATOM
COMPOUND
TROPHIC STATE INDICES
09 75 OB 13 75 09 25 75
0/01 0
1 ,00 E
0/01 7
0/P5 7
1.00 0
3.00 E
2.00 E
0/05 7
0/OV 7
5.00 E
4.00 E
4.00 E
0/08 7
0/01 T
ft.00 E
PALHF.R'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE OS 09 75 08 13 75 09 25 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
01
00
8PECIE8 DIVFFtSlTY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 3
NtlMBKR OF SAMPLES COMPORITFn M
MAXIMUM OIVF.RSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER nf IHDIVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
05 09 75 08 13 75 09 25 75
0.40
9.00
1.00
3.17
n.25
t24.00
310.00
0.13
O.Ob
34.44
2HA.OO
1.60
11.00
1.00
3.46
0.25
657.60
411.00
0.46
0.4}
37.36
231.00
1.94
13.00
1.00
3.70
0.07
4159.36
2144.00
0.52
0.52
164.92
970.00
18
-------
LAKE NANEt LONER HOHN'S nr*.
STORIT NUMBER I 490}
CONTINUED
05 0«
01 1] 75
09 IS 79
T»,XA
APAMENA
APHAtlOCAFEA
ASTIPIUNELLA
BOmilCOCCUS BRAUt'TI
CERATIUH hIPUNr>lH:U,>
CHROOMrjXAf T
cocctmrig
COCCONEIB PLACKNTU1.A
CRUCIGtNIA HECTAKGULARIS
CKTPTOfONAR rROSA
CR»HOKONA» OVATA
SLAKATOTHRU KFLATINPSA
rRACItAMA
rnHCII.ARIA CRUTUNENSI1
RtOCOCAPIA
GLnroTDICMIA
GIROglCHA t
MICROCtlTIK ACRUOIND8A
MICRCCY»Tiei IFICEPTA
OOCT8TIS
DHOPALODIA CIBBA
gpHArRocrsiis BCMROETERI
STAURAITRUM
8THEDRA
TCTRAKDRON HINIHUH
TOTM
IORM
fit
COL
CKL
cut
CBL
cut
CCI.
CEL
COL
CCI,
tr.L
cot
CBl
CEL
CM.
riL
cei
CUI,
CP1,
CM.
CCL
cot.
CEL
CEL
cn
AL6>L | ALCAI.
liNITS 1 UNI1S
» %c rrR KI i« »c cm ML
I
t
I.?
92,1
1)112.41 ?l
1 1
X t 1
1 !
1 1
24 14125.1
1
1
1
7116 1
t
1
X 1
I 1
1
II
X 1
1
13
I
|
|
X 1
X 1
X 1
St. 2
d.l
X
X
101
X
X
231
}K
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
s »c rrn ML
1 l
112*. 21 562
1
1
*
4
45.2
1S.7
4.1
7.(
970
X
X
357
X
X
X
1(12
X
X
X
1S3
310
411
1144
19
-------
LAKE NAME I DEfcR CRECK HER,
STORE! NUMBER! 4903
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 12 75 08 11 75 09 19 75
MYXOPKYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 r
0/01 ?
0,29 ?
OH/0 V.
3.00 E
4.00 I
0/07 ?
0,50 E
8.00 E
3.00 E
0/01 0
0/03 7
0.39 E
4.00 e
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 12 75 06 Jl 75 09 19 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE OS 12 75 08 11 75 09 19 78
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAX*
NUKBCR OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL MUMPER f)f INDIVIDUALS/ML
FVENPF6B COMPONENT
KEJ.ATIVE EVENNEBS
MEAN NUMHFR OF I*DIVIDUAtS/TAXA
NUPBEH/ML OF M05T ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
N
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.79
14.00
3,00
3.81
0.02
20)11.13
11J47.00
0.47
0,47
910.50
5047.00
0.06
12.00
3.00
3.S8
0.02
457.56
7626.00
0.02
0.02
635.50
7571.00
1.39
12.00
J.OO
3.58
0.04
4479.97
3223.00
0.39
0.39
268,58
2365.00
20
-------
LAKE NAHtt DEER CRIEK CM.
STORE! NUMBER I 4901
TAXA
ANABAMA
APHANIZONrNON flOS-IOUIir
AgTERlONrtl.A FORMOSA
CHROOPONtB T
COELOIPHHtPIUM NAEGFLIANUM
COSH»KIUH
CRTPTOMONti
CFYPTOMONAS MARSSONIl
CTKATOPLEURA SntK»
OI»TOH» TCHUE
T. tLOHCHTUH
DI»IO«» VULCARE
OINOBftTON DtVtRSCNa
CONtlRUED
OS 13
01 II 7!
0«
TORN
FLtCELLtTC II
17
CBOTOHtNSU
LEPTO«T»U»ON
HtNNItA «RCUS
CEt/OSlRk ¥»RI»NS
•MCKOCYSTIS INCERTI
PEDIISTRUN •ORTkNUM
SCENCDESMlia »RCU»TO»
SPHAEROCtSTIK SCHROCTEKI
«TEPH>NOD!SCU»
STEPHAKODISCUt It
SIEPHAHODISCUJ 17
9INEDRA UINI
TKTRAEOROX CRACltE
TOTAL
ALGAL
UNITS
* %C PER ML
1
1
SI 0.7
1110.7
7
4
1
«.»
U. 9
44.9
T4
147ft
700
X
1
7100
X
X
X
X
X
904;
X
ALGAl. 1 ALOAb
UNIT!! 1 UCIT8
.9 »C PER ML 18 »C tf* Ml.
1
7
»». J
0.1
141 1.11 )4
mi). 4i ?IM
1 1 1
15111.71 177
111 2.11 «9
7571
X
if
x
59
X
7
1 1
7.11 ««
•7.4
7.1
X
740
X
X
X
89
11147
1711
21
-------
NAMEl ECHO RES.
STOrtET NUMBERI 4904
MYXOPHYCEArf
CHLOROPHYCEAS
DIATOM
COMPOUND
NYGAARD TflOPHIC STATE INDICES
OS 12 7S 08 07 78 0<> 18 75
0/0 0
02/0 1
0/02 ?
0,60 S
05/0 f.
oi/o E
04/0 15
0/05 ?
0/05 ?
05/0 E
01/0 2
01/0 H
0/02 t
0/02 ?
02/0 E
PALMER'S TRSHNIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 01 13 75 08 07 75 09 18 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
DIVERSITY
... ._.. OF TAXA
NUMBER OP .SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OK1 INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVCHNCSfl
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAX*
NUMBER/Nlj at HOST ^BCNDANT
05 12 75 08 07 75 0» !• 75
H
a
H
iXH
:NH
0
N
0
RJ
1.
K
1,29
15.00
2.00
3.91
0.02
16162.36
U6H4.00
0.31
0,33
M45.6Q
^JIS.OO
1.79
13.00
2.00
J.70
0,i5
1039,99
581,00
1.49
0.46
44,49
305,00
1.72
8.00
2,00
3.00
0.05
3020.32
1756,00
O.S7
0,57
719. SO
918,00
22
-------
LAKE NAME I ECHO SES.
•TORET NUMBER I 4«04
CONTINUED
05 1J
0» 07 7S
09 t« IS
TA»A
ANKIITRODRKHUS FULCATUS
i, HCICULARIS
ARH1HIZOMENUN FLOS-AUUAR
AJITERlONlLbA FORMOSA
CENTRIC DI'inM
fHKOOMIlNAl T
COCCOHEU
UVMIl
CntPTOMONiS RCfLEXk
D1AT(1>4A
KLECKN5
CHOTONKHRTS
MELDA1RA VARtANS
NAVICULA
NAVICU1,* TRIfllHCTAT*
PKOIACTDUM
SCHRnEDEFI* SITIGCRA
SYNURA UVELLt
Tnr»i.
FORM
CEL
riL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
«li
CEL
CEl
CEl
COL
ftL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEti
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
UNIT1 I UNITS 1 UNITS
t tc pen MI, is ic PER ML is tc PIH «v,
I
4
1
1
1
».»
».«
11. i
T.I
«.'
t
1
Ill III
X 191 i.Jl 11 | 1 1
II 1 X 141 1.31 40
11" Ml 5.3| J| JSI J.J| 10
1711 t 1
fl J )* 1 .11 ? 2 i s
1 1
K 1 1 1 16« 5
906- (
X 1
I
X t
X 1
1
lid) It
X 1
t
X t
X 1
1
J
X 1
X 1
10. S
i 1 1
JO^ 11134.11 391
X 1 1 |
113 | 1 3.11 43
1 1 3.11 40
1 ) 1
Ml +.il 10
XII 1
1 1 1
XII t
«l MMI. 11 Sit
1 1 1
XII 1
1 1 1
XII 1
\ I 1 1
III 1 X
1 1 t
1 111
11614
im
23
-------
LAKE NAMEl LYNN RtCS.
STORET NUMBERI 4905
NYOAftRD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 15 75 Ofl 16 75 09 17 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLEUOPHYTC
D1ATUM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
0/0 0
1.00 E
o.ia ?
03/0 K
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
0,«0 E
02/0 E
OJ/0 C
03/0 K
0/06 7
0.15 T
08/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 15 75 OB 16 75 09 17 75
GbNUS
SPECIES
05
03
01
00
10
05
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF 1'AXA
NUMBER Of SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY HAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
rVEKKEBB COHPCNEKT
RELATIVE: EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER or INDIVIDOALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF KOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 15 75 08 16 75 09 17 75
H
e
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.89
15.00
1.00
3.91
0.21
2155.94
746.00
0.74
0.73
49.73
239,00
0.23
6.00
1.00
2.58
0.1J
92.23
401.00
0.09
0.05
66.63
386.00
2.3)
25.00
1.00
4.64
0.02
34504.97
14809.00
O.SO
0.50
592.36
7130.00
24
-------
LAKE NAMEl LYNN RM.
STURET NIIMRERi 490R
CONTINUED
(IS H 7!
01 1* 75
0» 17 IS
TAX*
ACHNANtHES
ANARAEHA
APHANir.UMEI'ON
ABTER1UNELIA FORMOSA
CENTRIC nmoM
rHRPCMONAS 7
CtCCONtIS
eorcoNFin PLACCKTIII.A
rRTPTUMUNAt EROHA
CRYPTCMrPA* EPOPA
V, Rtri.EXA
CNYPIPMONAS MAPSSrWII
CYMBrLtiA
MATOHA TKKUr
V. LLDNCATUM
IUNUTIA CIIPVATA
rHAGILARIA
GOMPHONtMA ACUH1NATUM
CClMPHONrMA TRUNCATUM
LINGktA
Mtl.OSIRA RPANULATA
MFLOB1RA VIRIANB
MdVICIILA •!
NAVICULA 13
NAVICULA CRTPTnClPHALA
NATICULA 9PP.
NITZHCHIA
NITCSCH1A VCP.MICULAHIE
OEOOCOMIUM
OOCftTI*
PINDnRINA MDPIIH
PtDIAITRUM DUPI.CII
PNORMIDIUM
RHOICUBPHrHU CURVATA
ICHPOEDERI* (ETICERk
8URIRELLA OVATA
HTNEDRA ULNA
TRACHELONONAg CRANUI.OSA
TOTAL
fORM
CEL
Fit
FIL
CEL
CEL
CtL
CM.
CIX
CI.L
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
cri.
CIL
CIL
cri.
CEL
m
CCL
CEL
Ctl.
CEI.
CKL
Ctl
riL
CCL
ra
CEL
COL
COL
ru
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CtL
s
1
a
i
4
8
%c
J.6
>.«
3.«
7.1
U. 0
14. a
11.)
).*
i.«
>.*
I i.«
ALGAL
UNIT!
PER ML
?7
X
37
S7
51
X
X
X
JJQ
l«(
159
Jl
1
1 37
1 )7
1 77
S
I
3
1C
«6.l
1.7
• I.OAI,
UNIT*
PER ML
X
X
X
X
JIC
IS
8
}
1
s
4
2
M.GAL
IIN1TB
%C fER Mli
I
1.71 540
41.11 7110
J.5I «*0
1
l.»l 374
|
1 X
O.SI t*
1
!
O.BI «»
1 X
I
S.7| 841
1 X
1 X
1 X
O.SI t»
O.SI »»
O.tl 117
0,«l 117
1
i.4i ir»
I
i
4, It »I7
I X
I. II 411
1 X
1
1 >
I
1 X
1 X
1
37.11 404S
1
746
401
14109
25
-------
LAKE NAMEt FISH LAKE
STORE.? NUMBERI 4906
NJGAAPD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 08 1J 75 09 25 75
MYXOPHYCFAN
CHLOROmCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
*.00 f.
7.00 E
0/13 T
0.07 ?
14.0 f.
2.00 E
6.00 E
0/08 ?
0/06 ?
H.OO E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 12 7* 09 25 75
GENUS
SPECIES
14
00
OS
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
MUMPER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAC'-PLHS COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIKUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER fir INDIVIDUALS/ML
. EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUK6EP OP INDJVJDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
08 12 7S 09 25 75
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.P6
32.00
3.00
5.00
0.07
18238.22
6377,00
0,57
0,57
199.28
2082.00
2.25
19.00
3.00
4.29
0.10
5334,75
2371.00
0.53
0.52
124.79
1103.00
26
-------
llAMfl flSH LAKE
RTOREl NUMBER! 490*
CONTINUED
01 I? 75
09 IS 79
ACHNAKTHES
APHAROCAPSA
CNIWDOMONAS
CHPOOCOCCU8
CHROOMONA8 T
COCCOkCIS PLACCNTULk
COSMAPIUM
CRIPTOMOIIAS
CtCLOIELLA
ciHBfLLA it
C«NBILLA 19
DINOtRTON DIVERCENS
fLAKATUTHRlX
EPITHtMIA TURGID*
MASILARIA CROTONENSIS
MACILARIA INTERMEDIA
rpiNCEi* ovuis
GOMPHONrHl GBICILt
XIRCHNCRICLLA
LkCCIIMCIMIl CILUTA
LACEUHCIMI*
M1CROCTSTI8 INCCRTA
MOUGEDTIA
NAVICUIA 11
NAVICUl* PCRECRINA *
OOCTSTK
PCOIACTRUH BOHIANUM
PHC'RHIDIUM
PINNULARIA
PIKNULARIA II
RHCiPAtODII GIIRA
ICrNEDCSMUS I1JUCA
BTAURASTPUW
RURIOrLLA
8TNCDRA ACU»
TETRAtDRON MINIMUM
TtTRArDRON MINIMUM
1, SCROIICULATUM
ULOTHBII
TOTAL
FORM
CCL
roi.
CEL
CEL
COI.
CEL
CtL
COI.
crt,
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEI.
ctt
CCL
CEL
cri,
COL
COL
riL
CCL
CCL
CEL
COL
cot.
riL
CEL
CEI.
CCL
COL
CCL
CCL
CIL
CEL
COL
riL
ALCAL
UNITS
» %e pen HL
I i
i
5
1
1
4
t.tl 132
1.0| ««
1.01 ««
11.91 760
1
l.«l «»
1 X
1 X
1
l.«l ««
O.S| }}
1 X
2.11 III
|
I. 0| ««
1
«,7| 4!0
19.01 1IS1
1
O.»l J!
|
l.tl 99
1 X
1 X
11.11 201]
1
1
l.ll 191
1 1
1 I
1 «
l.tl ««
1 1
1 X
0.31 11
).ll 112
1
1 X
1 X
O.SI 11
1
1
1 X
ALCUL
UNITI
1 1C PER ML
1
3
»
4
•>
4S.5
11. i
>.'
*.J
5.1
1.*
'!.«
1.7
X
1101
lit
X
I
X
X
1
111
111
111
12
X
X
«
ill
41
X
X
»I77 1171
27
-------
LAKE NAME! HUMT1NGTOM NORTH PCS,
STOPET NUMBER I 4907
NYGAARO TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 09 24 75 08 12 77
MYXOPHYCEAM
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGOENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 C
0/01 7
0/OS ?
01/0 E
01/0
01/0
O.SO
01/0
04/0
4.00
1.00
0/07
0.90
10.0
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 II 75 09 24 75 08 12 77
GENUS
SPECIES
02
03
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVCaAGf, DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA S
NUMBER OF SAMPLfS COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY NINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML K
EVCNNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF' INOIVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXDN K
05 1J 75 09 24 79 08 12 77
1.82
10.00
1.00
3,32
0.19
910.00
500,00
0.55
0.53
50.00
182.00
1.16
13.00
1.00
3.70
0.25
578.84
499.00
0.31
0.37
38.18
333.00
2.26
24.00
1.00
4.S8
1.22
370.64
164.00
0.49
0.31
6.8)
47.00
28
-------
LUKE NtNEl HUIITIHSTCIN HOPTH
ITORET "iJMBtdl 4IOT
CONTINUED
OS 1) It
09 14 15
01 12 IT
THH
1CHNANTHI8 MICROCEPI-M.*
V. ACICULARIS
•PN»NItOMFNON
IPHANPCAPIA I
CH»OOMONA» I
CHUfSQPHTTIH COCCOID CELL
COIMARIUM
CRUCICtNII TCTRDPtDl*
CHrPTO«ON*S EROIt
C»tPTO«ONH8
C«YPTO"OII*S 8PP,
CTCLOTCIL« COHTA
OClOTKLLt
GtENODINIUN ID»»
GltNOomilM OCDLITUX
MILIOKONK
H«LLO«0«»« »C»»01Dt8
KICKOCIST1S t IHCIBH
MJVICULl
"ITISCHU
OOCT8TIS
PHHCU1 HrCHLOPSII
PLIUBOdtM* OCLIC»TULUM
STNEOKt
MNIMU ULNt
TITRttCRUN
V. )CHORICUL«TUH
TOTtl.
ORH
CEL
rit
CEL
rit,
COL
CEL
CEI.
CCL
CEL
CCL
COL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
cm
rn,
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
1
1
4
1
1
«C
3«,4
J4.4
11.2
t.o
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
112
X
112
*l
X
I
X
X
>
45
SOU
1
~
2
1
)
»c
_°
2*. 1
46.7
».6
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
lit
X
X
X
111
X
X
11
I
X
1
I
X
m
a
1
2
S
4
1
%C
11. »
31. 1
11. t
'.4
21.7
ALS«l
UUJTg
*(R ML
1 11
X
t
19
X
X
X
X
X
II
14
47
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1M
29
-------
LAKE NAME! JOE'S VALLEY KES.
8TORET NUMBER! 4908
NYGIURD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 Jl 75 08 12 75 09 24 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHl,Of:OPHYCEAN
EUGI.ENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 f.
0/0 0
0/01 ?
0/03 ?
01/0 I
02/0 C
0/0 0
0/02 r
0,17 ?
03/0 I
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 ?
0/01 T
01/0 E
PALMtR'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE OS 13 75 OB 12 75 09 24 75
GENUS
SPECIES
01
00
02
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ADUNOANCC INDICES
DATE OS 13 75 08 12 75 09 24 75
NUMBER
TOTAL
MEAN
Of
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY
MINIMUM DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
NUMBER
NUMBER/ML
or
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
nr INDIVIDUALS/TAX*
MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
MAXH
MINH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1
9
2
3
0
4319
2805
0
0
311
1354
.54
.00
.00
.17
,04
,70
,00
.49
.48
i*7
.00
1
13
2
3
0
4623
2^64
0
0
228
1976
.56
,00
.00
.70
.05
.64
,00
.42
.42
.00
.00
1.
4.
2.
2.
0.
1789,
1140,
0,
0.
245.
610.
57
00
00
00
03
80
00
79
79
00
00
30
-------
LAKE NAMKl JUl'S VAM,E1
(ITORET NI'PPEPf 49CB
TAXA
ACHNANTHF.* MICRUCF.PHALA
ANABAENA
CARTERIA
CHROOMONA8 T
CRYPTOMONA8
CKLOTRLLH
niATOMA TCNUE
». ELONCtTUN
UINORHYON DIVCRUEN.1
UINOBHYON (UCIALE
CONTINUEO
OJ IJ IS
01 12 IS
09 2< 79
FRACII.ARIA CROTONENHm
CONPHDNEMA PARVULUM
MicROCYSTia INCEFT»
MnusriiTiA
NAYICIILA
NAflCULA II
TOTAL
TORN
CEb
rii,
CEL
CEL
CKL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
cr.L
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
S
4
1
S
7
1
%C
1.7
t.t
t.1
41. >
39.7
ALCAL 1
UHITS |
PER ML IS
X 1 1
1 1
48 I 1
242 13
4§ |4
II
1
X 1
12
X 1
1 J»4 1
1
X I
1
111) 1
IS
1
1
»c
!
1.6
2. SI
m.7
if.. I
J.I
2.3
ALCAL 1
UNITS 1
PER ML 16 \C
X 1 1
X 1 1
1 1
2S« 1 1
73 141 3.*
l«7t 1 1
1 1
1 1
476 12114.)
1 1
1 1
X 1 1
X I1IJI.I
X 1 1
110 IJIJJ.5
73 1 1
X 1 1
X 1 1
ALCAL
UNITS
PER ML
41
1*3
336
110
2IOS
2964
11*0
31
-------
LAKE NAMF.I MINERSVILLE RE8.
8TQRCT NUMBER! 4909
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 08 73 08 12 75 09 25 75
MYXOPHYCEArl
CHliOROPHYCCAK
EUGLENOPHYTfi
DIATOM
COMPOUND
02/0 F.
0/0 0
0/OJ 7
0.17 7
03/0 E
5.00 E
3.00 E
P/08 7
0.33 E
9.00 E
01/0 C
01/0 E
0.50 E
01/0 C
04/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE: 05 os 75 oe 12 75 o<> 2s 7s
GENUS
oo
oo
01
00
00
00
SPCCirs DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 06 12 75 09 25 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAX*
NUMBER Of SAMPLES COMPOHITCD
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY HAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER or INDIVIDUAL8/TAXA
NUMBER/ML Of MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
a
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.74
11,00
2.00
3.46
0.03
3125.02
4223.00
0.21
0.21
393,91
3728.00
1.73
17.00
2.00
4.09
0.05
7968.38
4606.00
0.42
0.42
270.94
3110.00
0.34
4.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
4105.90
12075.00
0.17
0.17
3018.75
11379.00
32
-------
LAKC NIMEl
NUMHERI 490*
CONTimilO
OS 0* 7!
0* 11 7S
a*
is
TA«A
ICHNKNTHrg HICROCEPHAL*
ANAMENA
APHAmoHENON rLOS-»1U»E
ASTERIQNELLA
ARTER10IIELLA rORN08A
CHHOOMONA4 I
COCCONCI* PLACENTUM
CKYPTONONAS
CRYPTUMONAS I »OS*
CRTPTONONA8
CIST
SU«OTI»
CBOTOHtXSIS
CLDEOTRICMI*
MICROCTIITII »ERUr,[FIG»»
NICRCCTITia INCCMTI
onctsiu
PHORHIDIUM MUC1COLI
nononavt,* CHODATII
SCHfOEDIBI* «ETI(!CH«
ST»U«»91P'JH
SYKUP* I
TR»CHELOMON*I
TOTAL
• OHM
cet,
Til
Fid
CEtj
Cll
C(l
CEL
CEL
Cll.
Cll
CEL
CEL
CtL
CEL
'II,
COL
COL
CEL
ru
cet
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
»
»
4
J
11
1
te
1.1
1.1
1.1
i.'
«.«
n. i
ALGKL
UK1TB
PCD ML
X
X
40
K
4!
«5
«J
X
X
170
I 1711
1
•
1
S
1
3
4
ALGAL
UNITS
%C PER Ml,
|
1 X
*.M «11
1 X
1
4,11 193
1 X
1
3,11 144
1.31 41
! X
1 X
1
1
».«! 411
1.01 41
1
I
»7.7l )l|l
1 *
3. It 144
1 X
1 X
1.01 41
|
1
«
1
11
1
1)
tr
14.1
S.I
I
1 0.4
ILCIL
UMT6
PIR ML
11J79
X
i *4»
I
1 SO
4)11
JJP7S
33
-------
LAKE NAMEl MOON LAKE
8TORET NUMBER! 4910
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 It 75 09 23 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 D
0/0 ?
0/03 ?
0/0 0
0/01 0
o/oi o
0/0 ?
0,17 7
1.00 0
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 11 75 09 23 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OP TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLf.S COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMFER OF If.'OIVICUALS/TAXA L
NUMPER/KL OF MUST ABUNDANT TAXON K
08 11 75 09 23 75
1.50
5.00
2.00
2.32
0.25
205.50
137.00
O.ftS
O.S1
27.40
1.62
12.00
2,00
3.58
0.25
746.82
461.00
0,45
0.42
3R.42
2M.OO
34
-------
LAKE NAPEl MOON LAKE
8TORET NIIHRERI 4S10
TAXA
ARTERIONFLLA FORMOSA
CHBOflMOKAS 1
CKTCTOMUNtH
CICLOTELLA
DINOBRtON SOCULK
DINOKKtON BDC1ALF,
V. kMERICANUM
r»«GIL»Rl» CROTONENRIR
HITZNCHIA
PKNNkTE DUTOH
PERIPIH1UM I*CONHI>tCUUM
sponnrLOSiuM PL»NUH
TABEbLARI*
TOTHU
1 ALGAL
1 UNITS
rnOH 18 »C PER ML
Ctl, 11124.11 94
CtL 13150.41 69
crt
CEL
cri
CEL
CEl
CEL
CEL
CEl
CEL
CEL
CfL
1
14. «
X
X
1«
1
1
IK tC
m «.
i i
i i
111*4.
1 1
1 1
141 9,
1 1
1 1
1 1
11111.
1 I
1 1
1 1
11
|
|
41
I
1
11
1
|
1
>l
1
1
1
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
4]
I
3S1
X
42
11
X
1J1
4(1
35
-------
LAKK NAME I NAVIUO LAKE
STOHET NUMBERJ 4011
NYGAARD THOPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 04 30 75 08 13 75 09 35 75
MYXOPHYCEM
CHLORaPHYCEAN
EUCLENOPHYTE
OIATO*
COMPOUND
01/0 K
0/0 0
0/01 ?
0.67 E
03/0 E
3.00 E
4.00 E
0/07 7
01/0 E
8.00 E
0/01 0
4.00 E
0/04 7
01/0 E
5.00 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 04 30 75 OB 13 75 09 25 79
GENUS
00
00
01
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
PATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMREH OF TAXA S
NUMBER UP SAMPLES COMPOSITED H
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDI VTDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OP MOST AtfONUArtT TAXON K
04 30 !•> OB 13 75 09 23 75
0.01
«.00
1.00
3.00
0.65
0.83
83.00
0.00
-0.37
10.38
03.00
1.70
IS. 00
2.00
3.91
0.10
3070.20
1806.00
0.43
0.43
120.40
1204.00
3.19
8.00
2.00
3.00
0.07
2S27.26
1154.00
0.73
0.73
144.35
437.00
36
-------
LAKE NANEl NAVAJO UK I!
STORCT NUMBCRI 4*11
CONTIDUED
04 10 7«
01 II 15
04 IS 71
TAX*
fLOS-»OII»E
CENTRIC DIATOM
CHROOMONA8 ?
COSMARIUM
CRYPTONONAS EPOS*
CRYPtOMOHA* MARSBOKII
CVCLOTfLL* NENeOHlllIAHA
rLAKATOTHRIX
FLAGELLATE »i
FRASILARIA CROTONrnsis
GYMNODIWIUN
K1RCHNF.IIICLLA
NOUQEOTU
XITZSCHIA
OOCTfTU
OaCILLATORIt
PCR1DTNIUM INCON8PICUUH
PHORMIGIUM
8Tt»H«NODtSCUi
TCTCIEORON MINIMUM
V. SCPOBICULATUN
TOTlt
FORM
riL~"
CEL
CEb
CIL
CEL
CEb
CEb
CEL
CtL
CEL
Ctb
CtL
Ctb
COL
riL
CEL
CfL
F1L
CEL
ra
COL
CtL
CEL
I
1
»c
100,
ALGAL
UK ITS
PER «L
I
I
RI
I
X
I
X
X
RI
K
1
2
1
»
4
ALGAL 1
UNITS 1
%c prp ML I*
1 I 1
1 1
1 1
5.81 10» 1
1 (11
4.41 7» 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
it. 71 1304 1
1 1
1.41 ]( I
14. SI 212 II
1 X 1
1 X 1
1 1
1.41 9t II
| |
2.91 12 14
2.«l S» |
1 X 1
1 X|
1 1
1 X 11
not
»c
11. »
».«
17. 1
II. S
2.7
127.0
ALGAL
URITI
PER ML
ISA
X
62
417
IS«
11
X
! 112
1U4
37
-------
LAKE NAME I NEWCASTLE PtS.
SIPPET NUMBEPI 4912
NYGAARD TROPHIC STAT* INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 08 J3 75 09 ?6 78
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOPOPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUHO
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
l.oo e
02/0 E
1 .00 F
3.00 K
0/04 ?
2.00 G
6.00 E
S.OO E
S.OO E
0.12 ?
O.SO
11.0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 08 13 75 09 26 75
GENUS
SPECIES
03
01
01
02
09
02
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE OS 08 75 08 13 75 09 26 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER Of TAXA
NUMBKH OK SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY KAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER UF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OP MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
I
K
0.91
6.00
1.00
2.58
0.01
6832.26
7508.00
0.35
0.36
1251.33
bll7.00
O.flS
10.00
1.00
3.32
0.05
1H77.92
3134.00
0.27
0.26
213.40
1771.00
2.74
19.00
1.00
4.25
0.03
23654.42
8633.00
0.64
0.65
454.117
3798.00
38
-------
LAKE NAME! NEWCASTLE RES.
STORET NUMBER| 4913
OS 01 75
(it ll 75
09 26 75
TAX*
PLANCTONTC»
APHANllOMENON FIOS-AOIIAF.
ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA
CHLACYDDMONAB
CHROOKONAS 1
CLnSTERIUM
CRYPTUMOHAS ERO*A
CRYPTOHONAH MARS80NII
CYCLOTF.LLA MENEGHINIANA
rLAKATOTHHIX
tlUDURINA ELECANS
FUCI.ENA
FRACILARIA CRnTONENRTI
'iLENODINIUM EbAX
CYRU8IGMA
KIKCHNERIRLLA
MELU8IRA (IRANUbATA
MEtnaiRA CMANULATA
V. AKGUSTISSIM*
MICHOCYSTI* INCERTA
HITt$CHt» ACICULARTS T
IIOCY8TIS
PEOIARTRUM
KCHKOEDEHtA SETICERA
RPHAEROCY8TI8 8CNROF.TCI)I
KTAIIRA8TRUM
BTtCHANODIBCUS
V.
TOTAL
FORM
CEL
Fit
CEL
CEL
CEL
CKL
CFl
crL
CEL
COI.
cor,
CEL
CEI,
CEL
CEI.
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
ri:L
CEL
a
j
4
t
9
1
»C
».7
0,1
11.)
9,1
ti.S
ALOAL
UNITS
PER «L
tit
X
!S
1001
56
(117
i
9
1
1
4
%C
10. f.
• ).o
2.1
4.1
ALGAL
UNITS
PF.R ML
X
X
X
737
1711
45
X
91
X
X
8
5
1
4
1
a
ALGAL
UNITS
1C PER ML
O.H 49
4.91 M3
44.01 3799
C.ll 54]
1.71 141
O.»l 49
0.41 4«
1
4.*l >»S
1 X
1
t X
9.71 119
1
O.tl 49
I X
1.11 99
[
l.ll 99
1
14.1| 1311
1 X
1.71 149
1
I
«.*! S«
7501
7114
39
-------
LAKE NAMEl OTTER CREEK KEB.
STOUPT NUMBER I 4913
NYGAAKD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 09 75 08 13 75 09 25 TS
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 T
1.00 E
04/0 E
01/0 E
Ul/0 E
0/03 ?
0.50 E
03/0 E
02/0 E
02/0 C
0/04 7
0,60 E
07/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 09 7S 08 13 75 09 25 75
GENUS
SPECIES
05
00
01
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA S
NUMBEH OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER Or INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF HOST ABUNDANT TAXOH K
OS 09 7* 08 13 73 09 25 75
2.01
12.00
2.00
3.58
0.02
19171.38
9538.00
0.56
0,56
794.83
5323,00
1.11
9.00
2.00
3.17
0.02
6824.28
6140.00
O.JS
0.35
683.11
4919.00
1.55
17.00
2.00
4.09
0.29
920.70
594.00
0.38
0.34
34.94
372.00
40
-------
LAKE HAHSl OTTER CR*CK RES,
«tt>RET NUXBERI 4*11
T»XA
COHTINUKO
»»A»AINA PLANCTONICH
•fHANItOMENOM
CCMTIUM HIDUHDINCLl*
CHLAMYDaMON>B
CHROOMONAS 1
CPUCIGEIIIA
CRITPTUNONAt
CH»PTOMON»g MARISONIT
uv»r»
DlkTCMt VULORr
CflTHCHt* (OUCH
rH»CIL»RI»
rR»CH,»KI» It
rH»GIL»RI» CROTDNEH8IB
rXDGILIRIk LCPT08TJUBON
RktflODINIUM IOH
«MIOMON»S
MEI.OI1RD GRANUttTk
V. »HGUST1»S1H»
OS 0* 75
01 II 7S
Ot 25 7S
OOCT8T1S CRCMOSPHArntk
PCOI««TRtlM BORYkNUM
BHOPILODI* CIBRk
ICHROCDERIk SCTIQERt
8TEPHAHODI8CU8
ULNI
TUTAL
OHM
riL
riL
ra
CEL
CCL
CCL
COL
CCL
CCL
ctr.
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CtL
CtL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CM.
CCL
CEL
COL
CCL
CCb
CCL
CCL
1
S
I
4
t
2
tc
».»
Mil
4.7
J8.I
14.0
J.i
1.1
ALGAL
UNITS
tit ML
l»7
10(5
444
SJ2J
1)11
X
X
X
X
I
288
1 111
1
*
1
I
4
2
»
»C
10.4
J.S
0.9
0,9
o.»
10.0
J.5
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
MJ
214
Si
SJ
x
SI
4919
214
X
s
1
4
>
1
tc
12. S
12.9
11. S
82, •
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
74
X
74
X
X
74
172
X
k
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
«5JI
6144
41
-------
LAPG NAME| PANGUITCH
STOPET NUMBER! 4914
NYGMHD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 08 13 75 09 25 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHI.OROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
3.00 E
1.00 E
0/04 T
0.50 E
5,00 C
03/0 E
0/0 0
0/03 1
1.00 E
04/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 13 75 09 25 75
RFNU8
SPECIES
01
00
00
00
SPECIES niVKRSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVEHACF DIVERSITY H
MUMPER OF TAXA S
HUMBER OF SAMPhFIS COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
D
H
J
RJ
L
K
TOTAL
TOTAL NUMBtR OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
FV&NNF.S6 COMPONF.NT
PELATIVK EVENNESS
MF.AN NUMBER riF INUIVIPUAL9/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OP MUST ABUNDANT TAXON
09 13 75 09 ?5 75
1.13
10,00
2.00
3.32
0,03
4331.29
3831.00
0.34
0.14
303.30
3127.00
0.00
7,00
2.00
2.81
0.01
0.00
B979.00
0.00
0.00
1282.71
8979.00
-------
NIHEl PANGUITCH LAKE
STODET NUNHCRI 4914
CONTINUED
0» IS 79
TAXA
ANABACNA
AFHANIZOMr.NOH fLUS-AOU*":
CERATJUM MIRUHDINELLA
CHRDONONA9 f
CtfJSTERIUH •
mrFTWIIIMf E10S*
CRYPTOHOH«S MAHSBtirlll
rRAGItANIJI CM9TONEN8I*
MICROCTBIIS ACRUGINOSA
tltCERTA
8PHACROCISTI« SCHHOETERl
KTEPHANOOISCUa
roKM
riT.
fit
CEb
CCl
cu
CtL
ceii
Ctb
ctt,
COL
cot,
CEt
COL
CtL
1
1
IS «C
1 1 1
Itllt.M
1 1 1
1 1 1.11
111 e.ni
1 1 2.11
i I I
1 1 O.ll
111 1.11
1 I 1
141 J.ll
1 1 1
III 2.11
1 1 1
ALGAL
UNITS
PCM «L
I
Jin
*«
29
• 1
29
2«S
III
II
( 1
ALCAL
UNITS
I 1C PER ML
1
11100.
X
• 97V
X
X
X
X
I
911)
43
-------
LAKfc NAMlfl PKLICAN UKh
NUMBER I 4915
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 OB 07 75 09 23 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOPOPHYCEAN
EUGI.ENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 7
0/03 ?
01/0 E
OB/0 E
08/0 E
0,19 ?
0/04 T
19/0 E
06/0 C
08/0 E
0/14 ?
0/03 7
14/0 E
PALMERi8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 08 07 75 09 23 75
GENUS
SPECIES
08
00
05
00
06
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER Or TAXA
NUMBEK OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INOIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OP MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 13 75 08 07 75 09 23 75
H
8
M
iXH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.02
7.00
2.00
2.81
0.03
4480.36
2218.00
0.72
0.72
316. 86
•01.00
2.95
31.00
2.00
4.95
0.23
4714.10
1598.00
0.60
O.S8
51.55
376.00
0.53
19.00
2.00
4.25
0.00
40291.13
76021.00
0.12
0.13
4001.11
70495.00
44
-------
LAKE IUMCI PELICAN
3TDRET NUNBEBI 491?
CONTINUED
D* It II
TAXA
• CTIMABfUM ORACILIMIIM
ANARAENA
CCHATIUM NIRUNOINELLJk
CHLANtDOMONAS
CHLOROPHYTAN CULL
CMROOMONA3 T
COCCONEIS PLACKNTULA
CORL08PHAERIUN
CR»PTOHON»S
CRTPTOMONA8 ER08A
CRTPTOMONI8 MUBSSonjr
CRTPTOMUNAS RCfLEXA
CRYPTOMONA8 SPP.
OACTTLOCOCCOP811 FiSCICIIHFIIS
DlCTVOil-HlCRIIIH PUIiCurLLIIH
DINOMKTON SOCULK
RPITNCNI*
CUQtiENJ)
rmcinKin C»PUCIH»
V. NESOLEPTA
NCRISHOPFOI* TCNUISRIH*
K1CROCIITU kCRUGINOSA
NICROCT8TI8 IHCERU
MUUOJOTI*
OOC«8TI8
08CILLMOPH I]
OSCILHTORI* I]
n»CILL»IORI» LIHNETKA
PinUitRUH BORtANUM
PEDlA»TBU-t DUPLEX
PERinmiUM IKCON8PICUUM
BHICUi
PHACU8 MtQALOP«I8
RHOPALODIA GIMA
aCENEDl8»U8 IICAUDATU8
8CEII(DC8MU8 »1JUO»
OUAORICAURA
OVATA
8TMEORA
TETBAIDROK CAUDATUM
TETRACDRON MINIMUM
1, 8CROB1CUUATUM
TETRAEDROH MUTICUM
TREUBADIA TRIAPPENDirULATA
TOTAL
TOR*
COL
Til
CCb
CEL
CCI,
CCL
ett
COL
CCL
CtL
CCL
CCL
cri,
CEt
COL
CKL
CEL
CCb
CCL
COL
cor,
COL
PIL
CEL
PIL
TIL
rtL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CCI
CEL
COL
COL
COL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
rcL
1
I
4
J
J
!
«C
l«.l
ia.>
u. >
17. i
i.t
ALCAL
UNIT8
PER HL
• 01
4«]
X
146
411
X
»1
8
>
»
1
4
1
1C
14. »
11. »
l.»
17. «
I.I
I.I
S.«
S.I
11. 1
ALCAL
units
PER ML
X
X
X
11*
X
X
X
(
III
X
X
47
X
111
141
X
X
X
141
X
»4
X
• 4
X
X
X
X
X
I
J76
X
•
1
4
»
1
I
»C
»1.1
O.I
I.I
0,1
1.1
).o
O.I
0.1
AkSAb
imn*
PER ML
704»S
X
X
«1
13J1
IS
X
X
9S1
MIT
X
t«7
X
X
X
X
9S
X
X
llll
7*011
45
-------
LAKE NAME! PINEVIEH RES.
8TORET NUMBER I 4916
HYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 14 75 08 07 75 09 23 75
MYXOPHYCE»N
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
04/0 E
0/04 ?
0.14 t
05/0 r
02/0 E
06/0 E
0.12 ?
1.00 E
10/0 E
1.00 E
2.00 E
0/OJ 7
2.00 E
5.00 E
PALMER18 OR'jANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 0* \t 7* 08 07 75 09 23 75
QRNU8
SPECIES
09
03
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE OS 14 75 OB 07 75 09 21 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAX*
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAX*
NUMBER/ML OP MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.26
18,00
4,00
4.17
0.04
11779.12
5212.00
0,54
0.54
289.56
2552.00
2.16
15.00
4.00
3.91
0.05
7311.60
9385.00
0.55
0.55
225.67
IflSS.OO
2.26
n.oo
4.00
1.46
0.13
1966.20
070.00
0.65
0.64
79.09
332.00
46
-------
LAKE NAHEl PINEVIEN RES.
NUMBIRI 491S
TAX*
ACHNANTHE8 NICRUCEPHAL*
ANKJ STRODE JMUS MLCATUJ
APHANIZOMRNUN runs-»ou»r
rUBAriUN HIP.U4DINCLI.A
CNtAWlDOMUNAS
CHROONONAS T
COS MAR I UN
CRtPTrwoMS KROSA
CRYPTOMOHAS HARSBOIIII
CRTPTO^ONAS OVATA
CYNBCLLA
cm
DINOiRTON DIVEPGKNS
rbtCELLATE I)
mSXLAPIA I]
mAGILARIA CROTONCNgIS
fllCWODINIim
Mgl,081R» GRANULATA
MJCROCrSTIS INCCNTA
NAVICULA
NITZSCNIA
oocrang
OOCTITIS SPP.
PCDIASTRUH
PHACOS
(CENEDCSMUS BIJUGA
scfNroesxo* QU»DRIC»IIO»
ACNROCDCPI* ICTICCPA
CONTINUED
OS 14 79
01 07 7S
04 ]J 75
•TCPHANODUCUS
• UP.IRELLA OVATA
TtTRACDPON REOULARE
». INCUS
TOTAL
TORN
CIL
CCL
rn
cet
CCL
CEL
CBL
CEL
CCL
ceo
CEt
CIL
CEL
cei.
ceii
CCL
CEb
CEb
COL
CCb
CCL
ceL
CEL
COL
CEl
COL
COL
CCL
COL
CCL
CCL
CEL
ALCAt' 1 ALGAL
UNITS | UNIT*
• «C V'.* ML IS \C PER ML
1 X
1.01 14
I
1
f.4l 4I«
4«.0| 2557
1
7.11 110
I«.ll 10)1
1
1 X
1
1
4.11 2)1
1 X
1 X
I. 0| 54
1
1
1 »
1.11 10'
1
1
1
1
1 I
6. II Jit
1
1 X
1 x
1
1 X
1
1
3.11 00071
1 X
1
11,01 00194
|
l.'Jl OO.IOC
1
4.11 141
1
7.M 00359
|
|
1
54.1) 01193
|
1 X
0.71 14
t
1
1 X
1 X
1
1 X
1 X
1
9,01 00)01
0.7) 14
1
1
1
1
ALGAL
UNIT1
8 *C PER ML
1
1
14.11 !•«
|
1
1«.1I )««
1 X
4.7) 41
14. )| 114
|
1
1
1 X
1
1
3S.ll ))2
1
1 X
1
1
|
1
1
1 X
1
1
1
1
1 X
4,71 41
1
1
1 t
Sill
IMS
170
47
-------
LAKE NAME I PIUTE RES.
STORET NUMBER I 4917
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE OS 09 75 08 11 75 09 24 75
MYXOPHYCCAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
0.11 K
0.14 1
05/0 £
0/01 0
6.00 E
0.17 ?
0.25 ?
0.00 E
1.00 E
ft.00 E
0.16 E
0.27 ?
18.0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE OS 09 75 08 11 75 09 24 78
GENUS
SPECIES
01
02
00
00
10
06
species nivcusiTY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER Or TAX*
NUMBER OF' SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MIHXfUM DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
ORLATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF JNOIVIDMAI.S/TAXA
NUMBER/MU UF MOST ABUNDANT TAXQN
05 09 75 08 11 75 09 24 75
H
a
M
,XM
NW
D
N
J
RJ
b
K
1.00
15,00
1.00
1.91
0.02
12617,00
12617.00
0,26
0.26
841.11
10007.00
2.55
19.00
1.00
4.25
0.15
1718.10
1466.00
0.60
0.59
77.16
489.00
2.97
31,00
2.00
5.04
0,08
15810.10
5310.00
O.S9
0.99
161.52
1615.00
48
-------
LAKE NANEl tllltt Kit.
*TO*CT NUMBER I 4911
n «t is
01 1) IS
J* IS
TkXft FORK
ACHNAN7HE9 NINUTI88IHA CfL
JJj"J*J"J" COL
». ACICUIARIB CCL
KPHAMIlnMCNOM PL08BAQUAIC TIL
ABTEHIONKLLA FORH08A CEL
CERATIUM HIRUNDINCLLA CfL
CHRI10HCNAS T CEL
COEL08PHAERIUM COL
CmiCIGBNll TETRAPEDIII CUL
CfffTCKOHIK CPOSA CFL
CHTPTOMOHIS OVkTA BEL
CRTPTOMONM RErlEXA CEL
CP.mOCONU BPP, eet
CTCLOTELLI HtHECHIHI AHA CEL
CtlMtOPLeUM fgf.
CTHBELIA CCL
PIATOHA TtNUt
V. CLCktilTUM CCL
niNOBHIOH DUKROtm CCL
I)II->,OP»»J,J» ACUtA CEt
ri)<;iiEN» CEL
KUOLENA ttP, CEl
FPAWILAPIA CROTCNENSId CEL
ROMPHOKEMA CEL
>;rXKOD)»IUK ALBULUM CEl
ilTRtlBIGKA CEL
MLGIKHIIMIIL CILIATI cii.
LTNCSTA riL
MALLOMDNtl ACARDIDCB CEL
MALLOM01M riEUUOCORnNATt CEL
1. AKCI'STISBIKA C't.
NAflCULA CEL
• AVICULA CMPTC1CEPHALA CEL
MTtRCNIA CIL
MTtVCHZJk 4IGMA } CVL
UTISCHIA fCRMICVLtRIB CIL
OOCIITXS CEL
PIDIdBTRVN DITFLEX CCL
§CEMEDCSMUI ftlJUCh CCL
KENEDIIKUI OIMORPHU8 COL
ICENEDtSMUl OUADRICAUDA COL
(CMP.OEDERIA SCTIRFKA CEl
»TAURAStRUM CtL
6TFPHANODIACU6 CCL
SURIKILLA OVATA CEL
BTKtORA U LH Ik CEL
•INEDRA ULNA
T. IMPREftBA CCL
TETRA8IRUM ST»UBOCr>c I HtfORKt COL
rHACKELOHOIIA! II Ctl
T*ACHCLOHDNAt rLUVHTILIB CtL
ALSAL
i v: PI* IL
1 X
O.JI J7
1 0.*
' >.4
0.1
7».9
1 IS. 4
«.l
0.*
|
1
X
10
42«
f 7
X
10001
1*4]
11
• 0
X
X
I
X
AL^AL
MITB
Jl 1C PER ML
*
2
4
1
*
1.4
JJ.H
14.1
11. 1
4,«
>».«
4.1
4.1
IS
X
X
309
114
X
TO
X
j.
41*
10
X
I
10
I
I
X
X
ALGAL
UNIT!
9 %C PER ML
3
1
»
4
>
1.0
4.0
«.«
)0,T
1.0
4.0
6.9
1.0
as.i
4.«
1,«
X
X
X
Sj
111
SJt
t*u
13
111
It*
x
x
x
13
111*
X
X
X
J
111
U
Jt
ft
1.01 S3
ft.Vl 149
1.01 S3
1.01 51
I
X
X
X
1.01 SI
t X
T«TAL uen i46e «no
49
-------
LAKE NAMEl PORCUPINE RES.
STORET NUMBER I 4918
MYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE US 14 75 06 06 75 09 23 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLHROPHYCEAN
EtJGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 T
0/04 7
01/0 E
0/0 0
04/0 E
0/04 7
0.33 E
OS/0 E
0/0 0
01/0 E
0X01 J
1.00 E
03/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 14 75 08 06 75 09 23 78
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
01
00
02
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUHDANCC INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OP TAXA
NUMBER OP SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBICP OP INDIVIDUALS/ML
KVENNESS COMPONENT
KfiLATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAbS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML Of MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 14 75 08 06 75 09 23 75
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
b
K
0,95
10.00
2.00
3.32
0.03
3952.00
4160.00
0.29
0.2H
416.00
3196.00
1.69
13.00
2.00
3.70
0.07
3680.82
2178.00
0.46
0.45
167.54
1147.00
2.11
8.00
1.00
3.00
0.05
36S8.74
1734.00
0.70
0.70
216.75
S87.00
50
-------
LAKE NANKl PORCUPINE RES.
HTDRICT IIIIMIERI 4*11
TAXA
ANARAEIIA
ANKISTROnEKMUS FALCATUg
ARTCRIONELLA rORNOS*
CIIROOMONAS ?
CRTfTOHONtS CROSA
CRYPTQMriNAS NARSilnNH
CRTPTOMONAS 8PP.
CTCLOTELLA CONTA
CTHATOPLCURA SOLEA
CTMBELLA
PIKOBRYDN OIVERGENH
EI.AKftTOTHRIX
rRACILARIA CROTONENHIS
ULEKDOIKIUM OCULATUM
GOMPHONEMA TRUNCATUM
MCLOaiRA GRANULATA
HER1DION CIRCULARE
NAVICULA
OOCTITI8
PERIDINIUM
«PHACRnCT«TII
TOTAL
cammin
OS 14 7S
e* JJ is
PORN
TIL
ML
CCb
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CKL
CCL
CEL
CEL
COL
CCL
COL
ALGAL
UKITS
• %C PER KL
1
I
I
T«,l
«.»
11.)
I
It
Hit
10)
X
761
X
I
X
ALCAL
UNITS
1 %C PER ML
)
t
I
1
1.71 11
1 >
1
1 X
1 X
l.ll 1«1
)!.«! (II
1 X
1
S2.7I 1147
1 X
1
1
|
1 X
1
III LSI 7«
X 141 1.7) If
II 1 X
ALGAL
UNITI
I %C PER. ML
4
S
1
1
)
I
1
«.II 1»1
1
7.01 111
1
1
SI. 31 111
I
1
H.M 10}
1
1 X
1
1
14.01 142
|
1
7.01 lit
1 t
1
4ISC
2171
1714
51
-------
LAKE HAMEl PRUESS RES.
STORET NUMBER! 4919
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 08 13 75 09 26 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
UIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
0/0 0
1.00 E
0.33 E
03/0 E
0/01 0
3.00 E
0.33 E
0.40 E
6.00 E
1.00 E
4.00 K
0.60 E
0.25 ?
9.00 E
PALMER"8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 06 13 75 09 26 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 08 13 75 09 26 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF IN01VIDUAL8/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF KUST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
kXH
:NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.32
10,00
1.00
3.32
0.04
623.48
2134.00
0.07
0.06
283.40
2732,00
1.30
13.00
1.00
3.70
0.46
319.80
246.00
0.35
0.26
18.92
154,00
2.16
16.00
1,00
4.00
0,70
414.72
192.00
0.54
0.45
12.00
72.00
52
-------
LIKE NkREl PflUMS RtS.
4TORET RHMP-EHI 4919
COHTINUCD
Of 0« Tf
91 11 79
It 75
BOTRYOCUCCUS BRt'JKII
CAIDNEI*
CERATIUM
CHBOOMOMH T
CUCCONEIS PbfcCENTUlA
COKLASTRUM M1CROPORUM
CRYPTI1HONAS ERoaA
CMTPTnMOND* HAP8HONII
C LONOI88IMA
PHICVa TORTUJ
RHOPALOOIt CIRRt
VCCNEDEIMU) HJUGt
aCHROEDERIt
KPHHCROCT1T1S
SPIftDGTRJ
STCPHANODISCUt
SUSIRtLH
SURII>I:H,» DVITI
STNEDDA UL«»
TOT»l
(IRK
ni
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CUL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
Ctl,
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEt
COL
CEL
COL
riL
CEL
CtL
crt
AlG»t
UNITS
• »C PER HL
J
1
COL t
».•
»«.4
X
joa
X
1131
X
X
X
X
X
X
At.CH
UNITS
8 tC PER ML
1
1
1
1
2
43. «
14.1
19.8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1M
81
Jl
X
1
ALOAL
UNITS
a 1C PER ML
4111. SI 14
1
S
1
1
12. S
11. >
11.1
H.O
X
x
14
X
X
X
24
X
X
X
X
X
Ti
4«
X
1134
J4«
53
-------
NAMEl SEVIEH PRIDGE RF.S,
8TORET NUMBER! 4920
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 12 75 OB 12 75 09 24 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 R
08/0 E
0.11 T
0.14 7
11/0 E
0.67 E
4.00 E
0.21 E
1.00 E
6.67 E
03/0 E
10/0 E
0.23 E
0.30 1
19/0 E
PALMKR'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 12 75 08 12 75 09 24 78
GENUS
SPECIES
07
00
06
07
15
09
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
"ELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIV1DUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 12 75 08 12 75 09 24 75
H
S
N
XH
NH
D
N
J
R.I
L
K
2.30
25,00
1.00
«.««
0.12
5821.30
2531.00
* 0.50
0,49
101.24
1101.00
1.12
J2.00
3.00
5.00
0.08
17871.36
5728.00
0.62
0.62
179.00
2309.00
3.60
31.00
3.00
4.95
0.11
12895.20
3582.00
0.73
0.73
115.55
937.00
54
-------
LAKE MAKE I BEVIER BUI DOE Rf.S.
STORE! NUNRERl 4920
CONTINUED
11 7!t
01 12
24 7S
T»X»
INABAENA
MKIBTRODEBMUH rALCATUS
APHANIZOMCNON FLOS-AQUAE
CERATIUM HIKUNDINCl/tiA
F. FURCOIDKS
CHAETOCEHUS CLMOREt
CHROOMONA1 t
CbOSTERIUM
COEbASTRUN MICROPURUH
COANAR1UN
CRIICieCNIA TETRAPEDU
CR»PTf>MON»» EROSA
CRIPTONONAS NAR8HONII
CRTPTOMONAS SPP,
CYCbOTELbA NENEGHINItNA
DACTYLOCOCCOPBIS
DIATDMA TEHUZ
V. ELON8ATIJM
OIAIOHA VULGAR*
V. BREVE
DIATONA VULCARF.
1, UrtEAHIS
DIPLONE1B SNITHII
rtlKATOTHRIX
PJ,»KAtnTHRIX }
ENTQMONEIS
EUCLENA
CUCbENA ACUS
TRAGIkAMIA CROTONENRI8
CYROBIOMA
RIRCNNERIEILA
MriiOaiRA CRANULATA
V. ANKUBTI8SIMA
MICROCTSTtl AERUGINnSA
NAVICULA
NAVICUI.A CRYPTOCrPHALA
NITZBCMII
HmgCHIA LONGII8IMA
V. REVERB*
OOCT3TIS
PANDORINA HORUM
PEDIASTPUN BORYANUM
REUIACTRUM DUPLEX
PEDIA8TBUH DUPLEX
V. CLATHRATUM
PERIDINIUM CtNCTUM T
SCFHEDESMIII BIJIIOA
aCENCDEBMUl DINORPHUI
iCENCDERHUS OUADRICAODA
8CHRORDERI* 8ETIGERA
SKELETONFMA PUTANOB
SPHAEROCY8TIB BCHROETEP.I
mURASTRUN
BTEPHANUDIBCUB
(IIRIRELLA
lURJRItLA OVATA
12
SINEDRA ULNA
TCIRAEOROH MINIMUM
Tf:TS»CORO* MINIMUM
V. ICRORTCULATUM
TEtPAiTRUH r OI.ABRUM
TETRASTRUH BTAURORENIAFFDRME
TRACHELONUNAB
TRACHILOMH»A» CREBtA
TRACHEliHMdllAB rkUVIATIUS
TRtURAPIA (ETICFRUM
TOTAL
rORM
TIL
CCL
rii
CCL
CEL
CEb
CCL
COL
CEb
COL
CEL
CEb
Cfb
CEL
CCb
CEL
CEL
CEL
C*b
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEb
CEL
CEb
CEL
CEL
cer,
CEL
rii,
COL
CEL
CEI,
crb
CEI.
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
CEb
COL
COb
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEI
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COb
COb
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
»
1
4
1
S
t
%c
1J.1
».l
S.*
47.1
1.0
1.0
i.o
l.»
U.7
ALGAb
UNITS
PER ML
141
X
X
X
241
149
X
l|9|
X
SO
x
X
I
X
I
X
X
X
?5
X
JJ
74
«>2
X
X
23)1
6
3
4
1
S
)
»C
».l
o.t
«.»
4.0
1.1
4.0
O.C
40.3
9.7
l.i
O.t
».l
1.1
9.7
1.1
o.«
o.t
1.7
l.t
O.t
o.t
ALGAL
UNIT*
PER ML
X
920
11
960
121
«S
12H
31
2309
!5J
X
M
X
31
X
3*0
11
X
X
SSI
(S
33
X
X
33
91
X
«s
33
X
33
X
5721
B
3
1
4
2
I
%c
1.1
».»
t.J
1.3
4.*
9.2
2«.2
l.S
3.1
10.1
l.S
1.3
4.1
1.3
9.2
1.3
9.JI
1
3.11
l.SI
1
ALGAL
UNITS
PFR ML
X
S3
S3
221
S3
its
331
917
X
X
X
X
S3
X
X
X
X
110
3*«
S3
X
S3
X
its
S3
331
S3
X
331
110
SB
1312
55
-------
LftKE HUME| STARVATION HES.
BTOPET NUMBER! 4921
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 1.1 75 OB 11 75 09 24 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 t
0/P1 7
0.33 K
02/0 E
0/01 0
1.00 fc
0/01 ?
0/01 I
1.00 0
1.00 E
1,00 E
0,12 ?
0.13 E
S.OO E
PALHFR'8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 OS 11 75 09 34 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
02
03
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF 1AXA 3
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS Rj
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAX* L
NUMBER/ML or MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
OS 13 75 08 tl 7S 0» 24 75
1.58
10.00
4.00
3.32
0.04
4202.80
2660.00
0.4i
0,47
266.00
1179.00
1.89
9.00
4.00
3.17
0.30
778.61
412.00
0.60
0,97
45.71
169,00
2.19
21.00
4.00
4.39
0,9]
•23,44
376.00
O.SO
0,44
17,90
125,00
56
-------
LAKE NANEl STARVATION PCS.
STOPET NUNIttRI 49Jt
TAXA
ANKISTRODESMUS FALCATU*
V. • CICUL»IU»
APHANOTHECE
ASTEKIONELLA FORMOSA
CERATII'* HIPUNDINCIH
CHROOKONA8 T
CIOITER1UM
COSHAR1UM
CRIPTOKllNAS CR08A
CRTPTONOIIH NAMSQNtT
CTIT
DIATOMA TENUt
V. KLONOATUN
DIMOBHTOM DIVERGEN8
DIPLDPSALIS ACUTA
CONTIRUED
OS 13
01 II
09 14 7»
rHAGILAHIA
FRASILARIA CRUTONINSII
GLENnOlNIUM COAX
GLOEOCAPSA
LACERHEIMIA LONGISETA
T, MAJOR
NALLOMONAS
MALLnMONAI ACAROIDIES
OOCY«TI«
PED1AITRUM BORTANUH
PERIDIR1UM CINCTUM
SCHROIDERIA SETIGCRA
SPHAtROCYIfia ICHROCTtRI
STEPHANODISCUS
TOTAl
1 ALGIL
1 UNITS
FORM IS »C PER ML
CEL
COL
CCL
cri,
CEI,
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CKL
CEL
CKL
CiL
CRL
CCL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
Ctt
CEL
COL
crL
CCL
COL
a
4
t
i*.i
i.t
it.)
314
X
X
X
10
tIT
X
X
X
CEL IIIM.1I lilt
ALCAI.
UNITS
S »C PER ML
I
4
>
1
3».T
11.1
19.9
4(1.0
X
I
ItO
X
SB
12
X
ISS
X
AL«AL
urns
S %C PER ML
1 1
4114. II tl
1
a
S
11. »
a*.o
*.>
t
X
X
us
X
X
• 4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
It
X
X
X
I
III14.IJ 4]
2*10 411 ITS
57
-------
LAKE NAMEI STEINAKER RES.
8TORET HUMBERI 4922
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 1.3 75 08 07 75 09 21 78
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
0.50 t
OJ/0 F.
01/0 E
01/0 E
0/02 T
0.25 T
03/0 C
1.00 C
0/01 0
0/01 ?
0/02 1
1.00 0
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 06 07 75 09 29 75
GENUS
SPECIES
02
03
01
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVEHAGC DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA A
NUMFtP OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY NINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL3/TAXA L
NUMBER/MI. OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
05 13 75 08 07 75 09 23 75
1.61
8,00
3,00
3.00
0.08
1663.13
1033.00
0.54
0.53
129.13
533.00
1.19
13.00
3.00
3.70
0.32
452.20
380,00
0.32
0.26
29.23
253.00
1.33
6.00
3.00
2. SB
0.13
490,77
369.00
0.52
0.49
61.50
201.00
58
-------
LAKE KAMI I •TCIVAKCII RES.
ITOMET NUMBCRI 4*11
TAXA
COMTIHVID
0} II IS
Dl 07 TS
0* II TS
APHANOCAPRA DiLICATIMIMA
ASTCKXONEliLA FOHMOCt
CMA»IUh H1RUNDINCLLA
f. HCOTTICU"
CHKOOMONAS T
C08NARIIIN
CRTPTOM.UIIAB KftOBA
CKIPTOMIIHUS MAMBIOIftt
CMYPTOMONAI ftTLtlk
CRIPTOMONA* IPP.
CTCLOTltH
CIHBCLLA
D1HOCRTON OIVERCKNB
rK»CIL»RI» CROTOHt»8J«
lUYlCULk ?
PIRIDINIUH
SCHHOIDERI* 81TISIIH
SltPHMODlSCUt
• KCOP.K
OP.M
cei
cm
C«l
cet
en
cri
cet
ect
cet
cet
ett
CCL
cu
cet
cet
cei
cet
cet
cet
AL6IL
UNITS
B %C Pe» ML
111*. 41 100
1
1
4
St.*
1S.I
1.1
X
S)l
X
X
1*7
11
j
ALCAL
UNITS
s »c pen ML
1 1
ll«t.t| 1S1
1
1
1S.O
(.4
X
X
»s
X
I
X
X
X
X
11
X
X
ALGAL
umr«
B «c prp »L
i I
tlS4.SI 101
1
1
*.l
14.1
14
114
X
X
1
ton
110
J4»
59
-------
LAKE NAMEl TROPIC RES.
8TORET NUMBER! 4923
NYGAAHD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATC 05 08 75 08 14 75 09 2» 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHtOROPHYCEAN
CUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
01/0 C
0/02 7
1.00 E
03/0 E
3.00 E
1.00 E
0/04 »
0/02 ?
4.00 E
1.00 E
1.00 E
0/02 1
0/02 T
2.00 C
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 08 75 OB 14 75 09 25 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 OR 75 06 14 75 09 25 79
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
Nt'MBER OF TAXA
NUMBER Or SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY HAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIV1DUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML Or MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
3
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.03
5.00
1.00
2.32
1.J7
0.42
14.00
0.01
-1,41
2.80
14,00
O.JO
10-. 00
1.00
3.32
0.03
1456.80
48S6.00
0.09
0.09
485.60
4660.00
1.67
10.00
2.00
1,33
O.S5
211.00
140,00
0,50
0,41
14.00
80,00
60
-------
LAKE imnri TROPIC *cs.
ITOftET NUMiMl 4991
T»X«
ANABAtNA
CERATIUK HIRUND1NELLA
P. ICOITICUH
CHRUOMONAS I
ChROONONAS aw.
COCI.OBPHARRIIIM
COKMARIUM
CRYPTOMOKAI EROIA
CRTPTQMDNAI ENDS*
v. REFLEXA
CTMBtLLA
rP»ClI,»KI» CRUTONENHII
(1LOEOTRICHI*
CONTINUED
OS 01 It
01 U 71
o»
TS
HICBOCtSTIS
MDUOIOTI*
OOCYCTI*
OSCII.LHTDPm LIMNET1TA
PEDIkSTDUM SIMPLEX
HHDPAIODH CIHH»
8PH»tROCt«TI» SCHP-UCTERI
«TNEDR* ULNA
TOTAL
rORM
rn
CtL
CtL
CtL
cot
Ctl
CEL
CtL
CE(.
CEI.
Fit
CtL
COL
PIL
GEL
TIL
COL
CEL
COL
Cll
crii
•
1
1C
too.
ALGAL
UHlTfl
PCD ML
X
X
X
X
14
a
J
•
i
J
%c
1.3
2.0
96.0
0.7
ALGAL 1
UNIT* 1
PER ML 1
«S
X
91
X
X
4««0
X
X
x
1 11
s
1
)
4
I
«c
57.1
14.1
14.1
14.1
ALOAl
UNITS
Pt* ML
X
10
X
X
JO
20
X
20
X
1 X
14
4196
140
61
-------
LAKE NAME! UTAH LAKE
STOPFT NUMBER! 4924
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 08 08 75 09 19 75
MYXOFHYCEAW
rHLOROPHYPKAN
EUGLKNOPHm
DIATOM
COMPOUND
2,00 K
6.00 f.
0.12 ?
0.67 E
13.0 E
2.00 E
7,00 E
0/04 7
1.00 E
6.00 E
2.00 E
2.50 E
0.22 E
02/0 E
6.50 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 13 75 00 08 75 09 19 75
GENUS
SPECIES
14
Ob
07
00
10
00
SPECIF* DIVERSITY AMD ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLFB COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMP.E.H Of IVDIVIUUALf/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF IKDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 13 75 08 08 75 09 19 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
3.04
27.00
B.OO
4.75
0.07
15336.60
5045.00
C,*4
n,*4
ipfi.es
1MB. 00
0.85
13.00
8.00
3.70
0.02
9387,40
11044.00
0.23
0.23
849.54
9639.00
0.66
19.00
8.00
4,25
0.03
6646,94
7729.00
0.20
0.20
406,79
6854.00
62
-------
LAKE »»»ri UTJIH LAM:
ftTORET RUNBERI 4924
CONTINUED
OS 11 75
OR 01 78
0»
73
TAX*
AWABAINA
ANAHAENA IMROIDEa T
AUKISWIDCINUg PALCATUB
CKRATIUK HIRUND1NCLLA
CHLAMtDOHOKAB
CHI.OROGnniUK
CHLORIIPIITTIN COCCOIO CELLED COLON!
CHRnONOHAR T
CL08TERIUN
CLCITEIIIUN II
CLDSTIRI1IK »3
COCLAaTkllN MICKOPDRUM
CRTPTOMIiNAB EROSA
CYCLtlTELLA
CTCLOTEbLA MENtGHINIANA
niCTIOIPHAKRIUN PULCHELLUN
DINOPRYUN (ERTUbARIA
DIPUINEI8 KNITMII
DIPbOPBAbU ACVTA
ructrNA
EUCLfNA GRtCILII
CLrNIIDINIUN
CI.ENIIDINIUH UCUbATUM
KUTZ1NGII
MELOHIMA niSTARa
MELOItRA GRANULATA
NE1.UBIIIA CRAHULATA
T. KUCUITTMIMA
Mr*I«NOPEDIA TtRUIISINA
MtCHUCTRTII AEHUOKU«»
HICHHCTnTIS mcCNTA
• IflCIILA •!
RATICULA H
OOCMTIR
oaCILLATONIA
PMACUa HEtikbOPtlS
PINNULARIA
PTRROMONAil ANQUL08*
•CENKDE3MUI ACUNINATU8
•CENICnC.IHUa RIJUOA
«CENEOE5MU* OINORPHUS
•CENEDISNUI OPOLKNSIS
8CNRUEOICRM SETIflEBA
aURIHfbbA
TCTKASTRUN ObAIRUM
TOT»b
FORM
Til
fit.
CCb
CEL
Ctt
crt
COI,
Ctt
eci.
CEL
CEb
COL
crb
CEL
CEL
COL
ect
rn
CEL
rtL
CCb
cet
CEL
CEL
cn,
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
riL
CEb
CEb
riL
CEL
CEI.
CRL
COb
COL
COL
CiiL
CEb
CEb
CEL
COL
•
1
1
1
s
4
ALOHL
UNITI
tC PER ML
1
l.*l It
1
l.ll 101
O.SI 57
1
JJ.ll 1*1*
t.tl II
1
|
1
It. 11 *17
1
l.ll S4
l.«l II
1 X
1 X
1
1
l.0| 40S
l.ll 10*
|
1
1 X
O.SI 27
>.»! I«J
1
l.7| lit
1
1
O.SI 17
1 X
1 I
1 1
1 1
1
|
«.»i m
i
i
i
i i
17. «| MO
O.St 77
1 r
O.SI 17
s
1
I
4
S
1
tc
1
117.1
1 0.1
2.1
1.4
0.7
4.1
1.1
0.1
ALOAL
UNITI
PER RL
I »«!«
If
104
X
IS1
7*
X
x
411
141
X
X
11
R
1
S
4
1
1
%C
III. 7
0.1
0.1
1.1
0.1
1.1
0.7
1.1
1.1
0.1
1.7
I.I
9.1
ALGAL
URI1S
PFR ML
1 HS4
1
|
: 17
jj
n
2
w
IIS
17
j
117
91
17
•
11*
17
II
X
11
17
S04S
11044
771»
63
-------
LAKE NAME! HILLARD BAY RES.
STORE! NUMBER! 4925
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE OS 14 75 08 06 75 09 23 75
MYXUPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLBNOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/01 0
3.00 C
0/03 1
0.50 E
5.00 E
01/0 E
03/0 E
0.25 E
0.50 E
06/0 E
02/0 G
02/0 E
0.25 E
0/0 I
05/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 14 75 08 06 75 09 2) 75
GENUS
SPECIES
02
03
08
03
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 14 75 08 06 75 09 23 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
HUMMER OF TAXA
NUMBER OP SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAl DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF IHD1V1DUAL8/HL
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML Or MOST ABUNDANT TAXOM
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.11
11.00
4.00
.1.46
0.05
269.38
2448.00
0.03
0.02
222.55
2412.00
1.62
10.00
4.00
1,32
0.02
9020.16
5568.00
0.49
0.49
556.80
2987,00
0.17
9,00
4,00
3.17
0.08
102,44
1132.00
0,05
0.03
125.78
1104.00
64
-------
liKC »»i«l MILLMD BAY RES.
itmrr numtui 4»j»
OS 14 75
o«
«* 11 TS
MAMMA
AUKIITAODMHUi r«t,CITUS
MHM110MMOH riO
A*TCMio*EbtA rounds*
CEftAtlUt NIltlHDINCbU
CHUooxoms t
CtOITERIUN
cuptononn no**
EUDOKIIIft KV.tB»»»
rUGbENk It
CUGbflU II
KCLOfllU «K»«UHH
OOCTITM
PCntMTHUN
V. CIikTHRITUK
ICtNCDMNWI OU»DI«IC*UO*
rORM
rit
ceu
rib
cet.
cu
Ctb
CCb
C(b
ecti
cet
cot
nt,
ert
Ctb
CII,
eib
ect.
COL
cot
cot,
Ctli
»L«»L
UNITS
I %c re* xt
1 i
lltl.SI 2411
*
l.»
»
I
It
(
X
X
(
X
X
X
»bC»t
UMTS
• «e PKK ML
1
s
1
1
4
1
l.tl 101
4.9
X
X
X
HI
O.»| SI
ll.fl ItTl
ai.ti itii
i
>.'! 107
t
1 X
1
1
IL«AL
UNIT!
$ «c rex HI,
1
a
u.s
l.»
X
1104
X
I
It
1
X
X
x
TOT* I,
)44t
S*tf
Illl
65
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/3-79-120
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN UTAH LAKES
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE , -_-
IJecernber 1979
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHpRIS)
L.R. Williams, S.C. Hern, V.W. Lambou, F.A. Morris,
M.K. Morris, and W.D. Taylor
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Las Vegas, NV 89114
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1BD884
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Las Vegas, NV
Office of Research and Development
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, NV 89114
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
02-21-75 to 12-11-75
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/07
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This is a data report presenting the species and abundance of phytoplankton
in the 25 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
Utah. Results from the calculation of several water quality indices are also
included (Nygaard's Trophic State Index, Palmer's Organic Pollution Index, and
species diversity and abundance indices).
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
*aquatic microbiology
lakes
*phytoplankton
water quality
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Utah
lake eutrophication
Nygaard's trophic indices
Palmer's organic pollu-
tion indices
Species diversity and
abundance
c. COSATI 1 icId/Group
06 C, M
08 H
13 B
8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS fThis Report!
UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
72
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
UNCLASSIFIED
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (R»v. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
------- |