EPA-650/2-75-040
June 1975
Environmental  Protection  Technology Series

-------
                                 EPA-650/2-75-040
    DIRECT  USE OF  COAL
        IN  A  FUEL  CELL:
FEASIBILITY  INVESTIGATION
                   by

          R. D. Weaver, Laura Tietz,
            and Daniel Cubicciotti

          Stanford Research Institute
          Menlo Park, California 94025
           Contract No. 68-02-1808
             ROAP No 2 IBJV-02 4
          Program Element No. 1AB013
      EPA Project Officer: Stanley J. Bunas

          Control Systems Laboratory
      National Environmental Research Center
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
               Prepared for

    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
          WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460

                 June 1975

-------
                        EPA REVIEW NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the National Environmental Research
Center - Research Triangle Park, Office of Research and Development,
EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                   RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, have been grouped into series. These broad
categories were established to facilitate further development and applica-
tion of environmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was
consciously planned to foster technology transfer and maximum interface
in related fields.  These series are:

          1.  ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH

          2.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY

          3.  ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH

          4.  ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

          5.  SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

          6.  SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL  ASSESSMENT REPORTS

          9.  MISCELLANEOUS

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
TECHNOLOGY series.  This series describes research performed to
develop and demonstrate instrumentation, equipment and methodology
to repair or prevent environmental degradation from point and non-
point sources of pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology required for the control and treatment of pollution sources
to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is available to the public for sale through the National
Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

                Publication No. EPA-650/2-75-040
                                 11

-------
                                ABSTRACT

     The first phase of a study of the feasibility of using coal to
produce electricity directly in a fuel cell is reported.   The cell under
investigation is a molten-carbonate electrolyte cell using a coal anode
and an air cathode.  The cell voltage, the polarization of the anode,  and
the nature of gaseous products formed were investigated.   Electrodes made
from charred coal yielded open-circuit voltages close to one volt.  At
975 degrees Kelvin, the activation plus concentration polarization was
about 200 millivolts at current densities of 100 milliamperes per centi-
meter square and larger.  At higher temperatures smaller polarizations
were observed.  The gaseous anode products were primarily carbon dioxide,
with some carbon monoxide.  Current efficiencies were somewhat less than
100 percent.  The low values were possibly due to losses of anode gases
by mechanical means.  Coal ash added to the molten electrolyte did not
appear to be deleterious to cell operation.  Descriptions of possible
future engineering systems and thermodynamic limitations are presented.
     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Contract No. 68-02-1808
by Stanford Research Institute under the sponsorship of the Environmental
Protection Agency.  Work was completed as of 28 February 1975,
                                   iii

-------
SERIES NUMBER
                          DISCLAIMER CLAUSE
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Research and Monitoring,
EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval does not necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                                  IV

-------
                               CONTENTS








ABSTRACT	     iii





LIST OF FIGURES	      vi





LIST OF TABLES	     vii





ACKNOWLEDGMENTS	    viii





  I  CONCLUSIONS 	       1





 II  RECOMMENDATIONS 	       3





III  INTRODUCTION  	       4





 IV  EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 	      12





  V  EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS  	      19





 VI  DISCUSSION OF RESULTS	      33





VII  EXTENSION OF CONCEPT TO POWER GENERATION  	      41





REFERENCES	      45





APPENDICES



  A  ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES, SPECIAL ANALYSES, AND EQUIPMENT   . .      47





  B  RECORD OF EXPERIMENTS	       56

-------
                               FIGURES





 1   Total Coal-to-Electricity Conversion Concept 	 7



 2   Theoretical Cell Voltage Based on CO /CO Equilibrium 	 9



 3   CO  Fraction for Various Temperatures and Pressures	11

     Calculated for the Equilibrium C + CO  = 2 CO



 4   Illustration of Cell III	13



 5   Current-Voltage Behavior of Graphite at Various Temperatures .  .  .21


                                                    o
 6   Current-Voltage Behavior of Peabody Char at 973 K	22



 7   Current-Voltage Behavior of Pocahontas Coal  	  .  .23



 8   Current-Voltage Behavior of I'linois No. 6 Seam Coal	24



 9   Gas Composition with Time Behavior for Graphite	26



10   Gas Composition with Time Behavior for Graphite,	27

     Ash Contaminated



11   Gas Composition with Time Behavior for Peabody Char	28



12   Gas Composition with Time Behavior for Pocahontas Coal	29



13   Gas Composition with Time Behavior for Illinois No. 6 Seam Coal.  .30



14   Flow Chart for Coal-to-Electricity System	  42



15   Elution of Gases	49



16   Calibration Curves	50
                                   vi

-------
                               TABLES
1  Open-Circuit Potentials Observed with Ash-Contaminated
   Electrolyte	           20

2  Summary of Reaction Product Studies at 973 K	           31

3  Elution Times and Estimated Detection Limits for Various  Gases    51

4  Record of Experiments Performed 	         57
                                 vii

-------
                             ACKNOWLEDGMENTS








     This project was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency,



Control System Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, whose



support is gratefully acknowledged.  Particular expression of gratitude



is due Dr. John Smith, Chief, Engineering Analysis Branch, and



Mr. Stan Bunas, Project Officer, both of whom greatly aided this



project by their technical direction.
                                   viii

-------
                            I  CONCLUSIONS


     The results of an initial study to determine the feasibility of the

direct utilization of coal to  produce electricity in a high temperature

fuel cell are presented in this report.  The system consisted of a molten

carbonate fuel cell with an air cathode and a carbon anode, and the study
concentrated on the anodic behavior of carbon in molten carbonate electro-

lyte,  Satisfactory behavior was observed for anodes made from charred
                           o
coal at temperatures of 975 K and above.  The potential efficiency of

production of electricity in the molten carbonate fuel cell system was

estimated to be more than one-and one-half times greater than that of a
steam generator.  The system can utilize coal in a nonpolluting fashion

because the molten carbonate retains the pollutants from the coal.

     The following conclusions can be made from this study:

     •   Carbon anodes can be  successfully oxidized in a
         molten carbonate electrolyte.

     •   Satisfactory electrochemical behavior can be achieved
         at or above 975°K (700°C).

     •   The open circuit voltage of a cell with a charred
         coal anode/molten carbonate electrolyte/air cathode
         is about 1.1 v.

     •   Polarization of the anode is not excessive (200 mV
         or less at current densities above 100 mA/cm ) at
                            o
         temperatures of 975 K and higher.

     •   The presence of ash in the electrolyte does not impair
         performance of the cell.

-------
Carbon dioxide was observed as the principal product
even though carbon monoxide is the thermodynamically
favored product.

A rough assessment indicates that the efficiency of
generation of electricity might be as high as 1.65
times that of steam-electrical generators. (This value
is based on a projection of fuel cell characteristics,
see p. 44).

-------
                      II  RECOMMENDATIONS
The following are recommendations for future work:

    The study of the feasibility of the direct use of
    coal in a fuel cell should be continued and should
    be directed toward the development of an engineered
    system.

    Studies of factors influencing CO /CO ratios in
    product gas streams should be investigated.

    Attempts should be made to define conditions yielding
    CO /CO ratios of 10:1 or higher.
      £t

'    Experimental cells should be used that will allow
    repeatable and precise correlation between the
    quantity of carbon used and the electricity produced.

*    Further studies should be made of electrochemical be-
    havior at various conditions to allow necessary design
    information for later engineering studies.

*    Studies of ash on performance should be continued, with
    the use of pure carbon (not graphite) in pure electro-
    lyte as a control reference.

    A study of matching air cathodes for use with the cell
    should be carried out in parallel with the above studies.

-------
                            Ill   INTRODUCTION








     Coal is growing in its importance as a primary energy source for the


United States; this importance increases as the total of energy sources



is forecast for the next twenty or more years.  Although coal is the most



abundant of energy resources for the United States, the present tech-


nology for its use provides two undesirable and economically and ecolog-



ically unacceptable products:   thermal and atmospheric pollution.  The


thermal pollution results from inefficiencies, imposed by Carnot limi-



tations to heat engines, in the conversion of the energy content of the



coal to electrical power.  At best, as much heat is lost as is converted


to electricity.  Atmospheric pollution results when particulate matter


(fly ash), oxides of nitrogen, and sulfur compounds are incorporated


in flue gases.




     A conceptual method for the more efficient conversion of the energy


content of coal to electricity has long been known—electrochemical



conversion.  The work energy available electrochemically is equal to



^G (the free energy of oxidation) whereas the work energy from heat



engines is /\Hn  where /\H is the enthalpy of oxidation and n  rs the



theoretical Carnot efficiency.
*  These are the standard thermodynamic terms for free-energy change,

enthalpy change, and Carnot efficiency.  The relationships are the

familiar AH = AG + TAS and n  = Th - Tc/Th.  In practice n  is about 0.4.
                            c                             c

-------
Since ^G is not significantly different from /^H for many reactions and
n  is generally about 0.4, the electrochemical energy available can be
twice the energy available from heat engines.

     These  facts were taken into consideration in early studies of direct
carbon fuel cells in which attempts were made to use carbon (from coal)
in an electrochemical cell.  The reaction desired was:
                       C + 0  -» CO  + electricity
                            Zt     £t
in which the oxygen would have been derived from air used as a cathodic
reactant and the carbon would have represented coal as the anodic reac-
tant.  In the studies performed between 1900 and 1930,  however it was
demonstrated that,  at the temperatures at which carbon provides satis-
factory current densities, carbon monoxide rather than carbon dioxide
is the principal product.  Thus, full utilization of the energy content
of the coal was not achieved.

     The work done in that early period did show, however, that carbonate
salts of the alkali metals in molten form served as chemically compat-
ible electrolytes for the electrochemical cells.  More recently, work on
hydrogen and fuel-gas (methane, for example) fuel cells, using the
molten carbonate electrolyte, advanced the air cathode to nearly satis-
factory levels of performance.  Thus, two essential parts of the cell
system,  the cathode and the electrolyte, had received adequate initial
development by 1970.  These developments were summarized by Liebhafsky
          1                              2
and Cairns  and by Trachtenberg and Cole.

     The use of carbonate salts to avoid or eliminate air pollution from
the stack gases of coal combustion systems has received recent attention
                       3
with favorable results.   In terms of electrochemical cells for the use
of coal, the use of molten carbonates thus offers the added advantage
that pollutants would be trapped in the cell electrolyte rather than
released to the air.

-------
      A concept for taking advantage of these facts was proposed by SRI


 as a means of efficiently converting coal to electricity by using fuel


 cells.  The concept,  shown schematically in Figure 1,  consists of three


 major steps:   (1)  a coal/air fuel cell,  (2) a water-gas shift reactor,


 and (3)  a hydrogen/air fuel cell.   The overall reaction for the entire


 process  can be represented as:


                        C  + O -.CO  +  electricity                     (1)
                             £     ^


 Because  of the use of a fused-carbonate  electrolyte, the proposed process


 for converting the energy of coal  to electrical power  promises to provide


 electrical power in a nonpolluting process.



      The  research  reported here was undertaken to  explore the feasibility


 of the concept just described.  Except for  the carbon  anode of the carbon/


 air fuel  cell,  the technology for  the  three subsystems of the concept has


 been developed.  Therefore,  a laboratory study of  the  carbon anode in a


 carbonate  electrolyte was undertaken.



      The  carbon/air fuel  cell of  interest involves chemical reactions at


 the  anode  (the  carbon electrode)  and at  the  cathode  (the air electrode)


 in an electrolyte  of  molten alkali  carbonates.   The cathode reaction can


 be written as:


                        1/2  02 + C02 + 2e~  _ C0=3                    (2)



 so  that the reversible  voltage depends on the  pressure  of O  and  CO  at
                                                            £      2

 the  cathode.  The  anode reaction can be  most  simply represented by:


                           C  + 2CO"  = SCO + 4e                       (3)
                                 o       2


The  anode  reaction  involves  three oxidation states of carbon,  and  the


equilibrium among  those three states,  namely,


                              C + CO   =  2CO                          (4)
                                    ^


must be considered  in calculating the open circuit voltages.  At  low


temperatures, the equilibrium lies to the left and the gas  is mainly

-------
COAL/AIR
FUEL CELL
l

CO
WATER-GAS
SHIFT REACTOR
H2
1
HYDROGEN/AIR
FUEL CELL
                                         REACTIONS
                             2C + C0_ - 3CO +• 2e~ (anode)
                                     O



                             1/2 O2 + CO2 + 2e~ - CO 3  (cathode)
2C + CO
                                         1/2 0
SCO (net reaction)
                                  Electricity
                            J3CO + 3H2O  -» 3CO2
                             [3H2 + 60H"  - 6H2O + 6e~ (anode)



                             1 6e" + 3/2  02 + 3H20 - 60H' (cathode)



                             I 3H2 + 3/2 O2 - 3H2O (net reaction)



                               *• Electricity
     Overall:  C + O2(air) - CO  + Electricitv
                                                      SA-3547-25
FIGURE  1   TOTAL COAL-TO-ELECTRICITY CONVERSION CONCEPT

-------
CO  ; at high temperatures, the gas  is CO.  Thus,  it might  appear  that  one


should consider the anode reaction  to be


                          2C + CO~  = SCO + 2e                         (5)
                                 *J


at high temperatures and


                      1/2 C + C0~ = 3/2 CO  + 2e~                     (6)



at low temperatures.  However, it is sufficient to consider one anode


reaction, i.e., Eq. (5), provided the equilibrium Eq.  (4)  is  invoked to


evaluate the partial pressure of CO at the anode.



     The cell reaction can, therefore, be written:


                                        2C + C0~ = SCO + 2e   (anode)



                              2e~ + 1/2 0  + CO  = CO~  (cathode)




           2C + 1/2 0  (cathode) + CO  (cathode) = SCO  (anode)        (7)



The standard free energy change for reaction (7) can be calculated from

               4
literature data  to be


                     AG° = 14100 - 62.65 T = -nFE°                    (8)

                       o                       -3
                      E  = -0.3057 + 1.358 x 10  T                    (9)




Thus, the theoretical cell voltage  is


                               o    RT
                          E =  E  -~2F~ loS  Q                         (10)


                               o             -5
                          E =  E  -  9.92 x  10    T log  Q              (11)



                                 3
                               p  (CO, anode)
in WhiCh        Q =  p(CC- ,  cathode)  •  P1/Z(0.  cathode)              <12>
                         &t                    £


     The  theoretical cell voltages  calculated are given  in Figure 2.


The E° values were calculated  from  Eq.  (9).   The equilibrium CO pressures


at the anode are calculated as discussed below.  The O  and C0  pressures
                                   8

-------
2.0
                                             I     I	I	I
                             1000
                            TEMPERATURE
                                                        1500
                                                             SA-3BA7-1R

 FIGURE 2   THEORETICAL CELL VOLTAGE BASED ON CO./CO EQUILIBRIUM

-------
in the cathode were calculated for a mixture of 1/3 CO  and 2/3 dry air


at the total cell pressure.  The voltage is a nonlinear function of


temperature and pressure because of the shift in the CO /CO equilibrium.



     The fraction of CO  in the equilibrium vapor is shown in Figure 3.


At low temperatures, the gas is predominantly CO ;  at high temperatures,


it is predominantly CO.  The ratio of CO  to CO is a function of temper-


ature and pressure.



     Although open-circuit voltages are a necessary test for proper per-


formance, a more important criterion is voltage behavior while current


is passing because the voltages calculated from thermodynamics will be


modified by the kinetics of the reactions involved.  As a practical guide,

                                                                  2
it was decided that if operation at current densities of 100 mA/cm  could


be achieved at cell voltages near those predicted thermodynamically,


feasibility would have been demonstrated.



     Carbon can be anodically consumed to produce electricity in two


ways as discussed above.  If oxidized to form carbon dioxide, as in


reaction (3),   four Faradays of electricity per mole of carbon would be


passed, together with the formation of three moles of carbon dioxide.


If oxidized to form carbon monoxide,  as in reaction (5), one Faraday of


electricity would be passed with the formation of 3/2 mole of carbon


monoxide.  These relationships provide an additional test of the feasi-


bility.
                                    10

-------
       500
       1000
TEMPERATURE — °K
     1500
SA-3547-26
FIGURE 3   EQUILIBRIUM  C02 FRACTION  FOR VARIOUS TEMPERATURES AND PRESSURES
           Calculated from the equilibrium C + C02 = 2CO

              P2(CO) , .  .    8919
                                       11

-------
                      IV  EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
     This section describes the various apparatus and procedures used in
this study.

ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS

     During the course of this study, three cells of different designs
were used.  Cells I and II were useful only for measuring cell voltages
because the anodes were not designed for collecting the anode gases.
They were similar to cell III, except that the alumina container was

open to the furnace atmosphere and cell I used a nickel counter electrode

instead of graphite.  Cell III was used to obtain almost all the results.
Figure 4 presents a schematic diagram of cell III; its components are
described below.

Working electrode

     Anode materials - Graphite, coal char, and charred coals

     Dimensions - Graphite, 0.64-cm diameter, 30.5-cm long,
     immersed 1 cm in melt

     Coals, approximately 2-cm long, 1.5-cm wide, and 0.8-cm thick

     Gas atmosphere - He plus CO  and CO generated by reaction with
     the melt

Counter electrode

     Spectrographic graphite rod 0.635 cm diameter x 30.5 cm long
                                  12

-------
ANODE GASES OUT

1
•MMMM
OUTLET

1

M

c
[
X.
r
\N
/
x^
N. -il
1

I


'
'
't (
/ .
I
/
FLUSHING GAS (He) INLET
— A
*

—
—
•>
L- <_>
' /
IR
s*

/
1C




/
°2 '
^\
!
p
|
|
/ /
NLET GAS (CO2) INLET


"1
J
"I
J
^
r



•> — ^
/
*
/ /
P
HEAT BAFFLES

-------
Counter electrode gas environment

     Helium was used up to run III-E, then changed to
     CO  to prevent cathodic deposition of alkali metals
     in all subsequent runs.

Reference electrodes

     Two separate electrodes were used, consisting of a gold or
     silver wire coil dipping into the melt and flushed with a
     slow stream of CO  (33%) plus air (67%).
                      ^

The cells were heated in an electrical resistance furnace equipped with

temperature controls actuated by thermocouples.

ELECTROLYTE AND ASH

     The electrolyte used was the ternary eutectic 'of sodium, potassium,

and lithium carbonates in a 3:3:4 mole ratio.  The carbonates were ACS
grade reagents, used as received without drying before use in the cell.
Studies of ash contaminated electrolytes were made by adding 10 wt % of
fly ash to the electrolyte.  Spectrographic analysis of the fly ash is

given in Appendix A.

REFERENCE ELECTRODES

     Reference electrodes for use in carbonate melts have been described
                       5,6                              7
by Borucka and Sugiyama    and by Appleby and Nicholson.   The electrodes

used in the present work were similar.  The half cell reaction occurring

was expected to be

                          2e~ + |02 + C02 = C0~                     (13)

The partial pressures of 0  (0.14 atm) and CO  (0.33 atm) were kept con-
                          £»                  £
stant by a small flow of air-CO  mixture through the electrode.  Since
                               £i
the literature mentions both silver and gold as suitable electrodes, one
reference electrode of each was included in the cell.  We found no real

difference in the performances of the two reference electrodes, although

performance was often erratic for unknown reasons.
                                   14

-------
ANODES



     Studies of pure carbon in the form of graphite were made using


spectroscopic grade electrodes, 0.635 cm in diameter.



     Studies on charred coal were made on samples of four types of coal:


Peabody char, Pocahontas, Decker Main and Illinois No. 6 seam coal.


Analyses are presented in Appendix A.  The samples of the already-charred


coal (Peabody char, Western Kentucky coal, No. 9) were used as electrodes


by forming a lump to approximately a rectangular solid, 2-cm long,


1.5-cm wide, and 0.8-cm thick.  A hole was then drilled in the end of


the bar, a 0.05-cm diameter platinum wire was placed through the hole,


and both ends of the wire were passed through an Al 0  tube of 0.64 cm
                                                   2 3

o.d.  When pushed toward the sample of char, the alumina tube tightens


the platinum wire, assuring electrical contact.  The alumina tube was


brought to the cold regions of the cell assembly where electrical con-


tact to internal cell circuitry was made through the ends of the


platinum wire.



     The coal samples were charred by two techniques.  The first in-

                                                       o
volved heating the sample in a helium atmosphere to 825 K at a controlled


rate of 3 degrees per minute.  The second involved placing a sample of


crushed and sieved coal in a small fused-silica tube.  A length of the


0.05-cm-diameter platinum wire, wrapped at the end into a helix, was


centered in the tube before addition of the crushed coal.  The tube,


containing the platinum wire and coal was then heated with a torch to


a red heat  (estimated 1300 K).  The total time for heating was


approximately five minutes.  This destructive distillation technique was


stopped when evolution of volatile matter ceased and the carbon had been


heated to a red heat.  During  the heating, a fused silica rod, placed


over the protruding platinum wire, was pressed against  the top of  the


coal sample to prevent expansion of the coal.  Charred-coal electrodes
                                  15

-------
 so prepared slipped easily from the fused silica tube and retained the


 dimensions of the tube's diameter.



      The graphite electrode was submerged in the electrolyte about two

                                      2
 centimeters, which exposed about 4 cm  of surface to the melt.   The coal


 electrodes as formed had a diameter of 0.95 cm and were submerged about

                        2
 2 cm so that about 5 cm  of geometric surface was in the melt.   The true


 electrochemical area was difficult to determine, however, because the


 samples were honeycombed by large pores.



 GAS AND GAS-FLOW CONTROL SYSTEMS



      Commercial helium was used in the anode.  Traces of oxygen were


 removed by passing the gas over copper metal heated to 725 K, and


 moisture was removed by passing the gas through a molecular sieve drying

                                          o
 tube (Linde 5A,  dried under vacuum at 400 C) at room temperature.  The


 air-CO  mixture was dried over molecular sieve.  CO  was a commercial
       2*                                            ^

 dry grade and was used directly from the cylinder.



      Flow rates  were calibrated by observing soap-bubble movement in a


 burette inserted in the line  as needed.   Flow rates  were monitored  by


 glass-ball  flow-meters.



 GAS ANALYSES



     All gas  analyses were performed with a  dual-column  gas chromatograph,


 Details of  the equipment are presented in Appendix A.  Samples of gases


 to be analyzed were extracted using Hamilton Company Gas-Tight syringes.
                              3
 The usual sample  size was  1 cm  .   Calibration  curves for CO   and  CO were
                                                           £

 checked daily, and results obtained were accurate to within ± 2%.



ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSES



     A list of the equipment most frequently used in the studies  is pre-


sented in Appendix A.  Study of the electrochemical performance of the
                                   16

-------
anodes required measurement of anode versus reference potentials, the


current, and the polarization with current.  Techniques used for these


measurements are described below.



Potential Measurements



     The potential of the anode versus the reference electrode was


monitored with one channel of a strip-chart recorder.  Assurance that


source resistance did not introduce errors was achieved by use of the


electrometer or by measurement of resistance by pulse techniques.  The


electrometer was used for this purpose by varying its input impedance.


If no change in indicated voltage occurred at input resistances to one


decade below the minimum of the recorder, that is, down from 10   ohms

     3
to 10  ohms, then it was accepted that the recorder presented accurate


potential readings.  Pulse techniques are described below under polari-


zation measurements.



Polarization Measurements



     The voltage behavior of the anode with various levels of current


was studied under steady-state and transient  (pulse) conditions.  Steady-


state behavior  at various levels of current was studied by adjusting the


current to desired levels, either by adjusting the programmable power


supply or by adjusting the potentiostat  in the galvanostatic mode.  The


potential of the anode versus the reference was recorded on a strip-


chart recorder.  An alternative method,  and one consuming less'operator


time, was to program the potentiostat in the  galvanostatic mode to


follow a linear change in signal with time.   This signal was generated


by the waveform generator.  At very low  sweep rates, requiring 16


minutes to vary the current from zero to the  desired upper current  limit,


the results were in agreement with the manual steady-state technique.


Since the data  obtained  in this programmed mode were recorded on an x-y


recorder using  the current and voltage analog outputs  from the




                                  17

-------
potentiostat, they directly produced the polarization curves.





     Measurement of resistance and activation polarization require



fast-response pulse techniques.  An oscilloscope was used to monitor



voltage behavior with time when the current was abruptly (less than 3



microseconds) changed from one level to another.  Resistance values were



also obtained from the slope of the I-V polarization curves, discussed



above, and by use of an ac resistance bridge.





TYPICAL PROCEDURE





     The procedure used to study the anodic behavior of carbon was as



follows.  The assembled cell, equipped with all gas and electrical



connections and already containing the correct amount of electrolyte and



the anode under study, was raised from an idling temperature of about



773°K to the temperature desired for the study.  Two to four hours were



required to reach and stabilize the temperature.  During this time, the



flow rates of gases from the components of the cell were checked, the



chromatograph was readied for analysis, and chromatographic response was



checked against previously established calibration curves.  If measure-



ments to correlate gas composition and rate with current were desired, it



was necessary to wait until a steady-state background for the gases was



attained.  If the anode had been studied previously, this steady state



was sometimes reached in as little as two to four hours.  If the anode



was newly prepared, however, or if the temperature change made.was




extreme (e.g., 1100-1200°K), longer periods were required.




     Correlations of gas kind and evolution rate with various current



levels were undertaken after steady-state gas composition had been reached.



After the particular study was completed, the temperature of the cell was



lowered to 773 K.  The temperature of the cell was not allowed to cool to



the freezing point of the electrolyte.
                                   18

-------
                        V  EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

     Studies of the electrochemical oxidation of carbon electrodes in a
molten carbonate electrolyte were made with various carbons and at
various temperatures, both with pure electrolyte and with electrolyte
containing 10% ash.  The studies included the voltage of the carbons
relative to a reference electrode, which was essentially equivalent in
potential to the potential expected with an air cathode in a complete
cell.  The electrochemical behavior during passage of significant current
was also studied.
POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS
     The voltages observed between the various carbon electrodes and the
reference electrode are presented in Appendix B.  The values were often
erratic, but the erratic behavior could generally be traced to the
reference electrode; that is, the voltage between the working anode and
the graphite counter electrode was generally stable even when the anode-
reference voltage was erratic.  The last eight runs with cell III  (P to
W) seemed to have stable open circuit voltages.  These values are
collected in Table 1, together with some of the earlier, erratic values .
CURRENT-VOLTAGE BEHAVIOR
     The polarization of the carbon anodes was studied under various
conditions of  current drain and  sweep rate  (rate of change of current)
as well as temperature  and kind  of carbon.  The currents were controlled
by a programmable potentiostat and were recorded versus voltage on  an
x-y  recorder.   Sweep rates were  limited by  the response of the  recorder
to about 200 mA/sec.  Representative  results  are presented  in  Figures  5
through 8.

-------
                               Table 1

                OPEN-CIRCUIT POTENTIALS OBSERVED WITH
                    ASH-CONTAMINATED ELECTROLYTE
Anode
Graphite






Peabody char




Pocahontas
Illinois No. 6
seam

Run No .
III-I
III-J
III-K
III-L
III-M
III-N
III-O
III-P
III-Q
III-R
III-S
III-T
III-U
III-V

III-W
Temperature
(°K>
793
973
1168
983
981
973
1169
877
833
1043
971
982
985
974

973
Open-circuit
a
Voltage
(volts)
-0.81
-0.65
-0.47
—
-1.07
-0.74
-0.86
-1.10
-0.96
-1.08
-1.12
-1.08
-1.10
-1.13

-1.09
Theoretical
Voltage
(voits)
-0.95
-0.99
-1.17
-0.99
-0.99
-0.99
-1.17
-0.96
-0.96
-1.04
-0.99
-0.99
, -0.99
-0.97

-0.97
Reference electrode behavior was erratic during Runs III-I through III-o.
Voltages were stable and repeatable during Runs III-P through III-W.
                                   20

-------
> -0.1
  -0.8  —,
   -0.9
        TEMPERATURE    SWEEP RATES
    A - 973° K, (700° C)   16.7 min/1000 mA
    B - 1173°K, (900°C)   3.33 min/1000 mA
    C - 773° K. (500°C)   3.33 min/1000 mA
  -1.0
                     I
                     I
I
I
            100     200     300     400
                        CURRENT — mA
                           500
      600     700

       SA-3 547-28
  FIGURE 5
CUR RENT-VOLT AGE BEHAVIOR OF  GRAPHITE
AT  VARIOUS TEMPERATURES
                             21

-------
                                                             SWEEP RATES
                                                         A - 0.0833 min/1000 mA
                                                         B - 8.33 min/1000 mA
-1.1
         FIGURE 6   CURRENT-VOLTAGE BEHAVIOR OF PEABODY CHAR AT  973°K
                                        22

-------
-0.1  —
-t.o
 -1.1  -
 -1.2
                               A  - 0.0833 min/1000 mA, Before Electrolysis
                               B  — 8.33 min/1000 mA, Before Electrolysis
                               C  - 0.0833 min/1000 mA. After 100 mA Electrolysis
r
D
1
100
1 1
200 300
CURRENT — mA
1

400 500
SA-3547-30
 FIGURE 7    CURRENT-VOLTAGE  BEHAVIOR  OF POCAHONTAS COAL AT 973°K
                                        23

-------
                         -0.1  —
                      > Jl*  —
CO
                                                                                 A  - 0.0833 min/1000 mA, Before Electrolysis
                                                                                 B  — 8.33 min/1000 mA, Before Electrolysis
                                                                                 C  - 0.0833 min/1000 mA, After 100 mA Electrolysis
                                                                                 D  - 0.0833 min/1000 mA, After 300 mA Electrolysis
                         -1.1
                                           100
                                                           200
                                                                         300             400
                                                                           CURRENT — mA
                                   FIGURE 8    CURRENT-VOLTAGE BEHAVIOR OF  ILLINOIS NO. 6  SEAM COAL  AT 973°K

-------
STUDIES OF REACTION PRODUCTS



     The rates at which CO and CO  were generated by electrolysis were
                                 2

measured as described.  Electrolysis corresponded to the anodic


(oxidative) electrode reaction of coal and, therefore, to the discharge


of a coal/air fuel cell.  Examples of the variation of concentration of


gases with time for the various samples are presented in Figures 9


through 13.  Results of the reaction-product studies are given in


Appendix B.  The information on coals is summarized in Table 2.



CELL AUTOPSY



     The cell had been maintained continuously at temperatures at or

         o
above 773 K for more than five months.  During this time, the alumina


cell components were in contact with the fused-carbonate electrolyte.


During the last two months, the electrolyte was contaminated with fly


ash.  The cell was disassembled on termination of the study, and the


parts were examined.



     On autopsy, a crack was discovered in the outer alumina tube.  The


crack was small and coincided exactly with the end of the heating element


in the furnace.  The surfaces of the alumina that had been exposed to


the electrolyte showed no evidence of chemical attack or staining.


The effect due to this crack is not known.



     Most of the electrolyte could be poured from the cell while the


temperature was above the melting point.  The electrolyte that remained


in the cell was dark and was clearly highly contaminated with the fly


ash.  Polarographic analysis of the dark electrolyte showed that it


contained approximately 2 wt% of Fe (CO )  and 0.5 wt% of FeCO .  The
                                   £33                    3

electrolyte that was poured from the cell was white and showed no evidence


of colored particulate matter dispersed within it.  The concentration of


reducible species was undetectable in the white samples.  It follows,


therefore, that most of the ash was insoluble in the electrolyte and


settled to the bottom of the cell.



                                  25

-------
  40
LU


E
UJ
Q
O
  20
X

z
UJ
U

o
o

w
             Flow Rate
            1 CO2 Concentration
                                                                          HI
                                                                          cr

                                                                          00

                                                                          HI
                                                                          o
                                                                          o
                                TIME — hours
                                                                   SA-3547-32
     FIGURE 9   GAS COMPOSITION WITH TIME  BEHAVIOR FOR GRAPHITE

                 AT 973°K (RUN  III-F}
                                     26

-------
       50
to
                  Flow Rate
                  CO, Compotition
             FIGURE 10   GAS COMPOSITION WITH TIME BEHAVIOR  FOR GRAPHITE, ASH-CONTAMINATED ELECTROLYTE,
                         AT 973° K (RUN III-N)

-------
                            3         4
                            TIME — hours
FIGURE 11   GAS COMPOSITION WITH  TIME BEHAVIOR FOR PEABODY CHAR AT
           982°K (RUN III-T)
                                 28

-------
10
CO
                                                                                                              SA-3547-35
                            FIGURE 12
GAS COMPOSITION WITH TIME  BEHAVIOR FOR POCAHONTAS COAL AT 985°K,
                                        (RUN  Ill-V)

-------
CO
o
                                                           TIME
                                                                   hours
                                                                                                       SA-3547-36
                   FIGURE  13
GAS  COMPOSITION  WITH TIME  BEHAVIOR FOR  ILLINOIS NO. 6 SEAM COAL AT 974°K

(RUN III-V)

-------
                                 Table 2.  SUMMARY OF REACTION PRODUCT STUDIES
                                               AT 973°K  (700°C)
CO
Anode
Graphite, pure electrolyte
Graphite, ash-contaminated
electrolyte
Peabody char



Illinois No. 6 seam coal

* balance helium
x. «>r-f-;«-*-SAw*s*-ioQ rral CU
Run
No.
III-F
III-M&N
III-T
III-T
III-U
III-U
III-V
III-W
Steady-state gas concentration
during electrolysis
fraction*
0.290
0.223
0.161
0.324
0.192
0.445
0.183
0.441
CO
fraction*
< 0.001
0.003
0.037
0.034
0.078
O.O49
0.082
0.048
Ratio
CO /CO
	 2 — 	

75
4
10
2
10
2
9
Electrolysis
current
mA
100
100
100
200
100
300
100
300
Current
Efficiency
Cj
95
70
60
75
65
80
70
75
/2.66 x fraction CO + 5.32 x fraction CO \ /gas flow ml,
ated from CE% = 1001 	 ,m__ 	 __- 	 'HI fin







/min

-------
     Samples of the black residue of electrolyte and ash from the


bottom of the cell were extracted in a Soxhlet extractor with concentrated


hydrochloric acid.  A white gel, presumably silica resulting from the ash,


was found as an insoluble constituent.



     The samples of charred coal electrodes were weighed before and after


electrolysis studies.  The weight loss should be correlatable with the


known quantity of electrochemical charge passed through the electrode.


However, due to attack by the CO  dissolved in the electrolyte or by
                                £t

mechanical loss, the weight losses observed were one order of magnitude


larger than those calculated on the basis of the known charge passed.
                                   32

-------
                       VI  DISCUSSION OF RESULTS









     The purpose of the research was to observe the performance of



carbon anodes derived from coal in a carbonate melt to assess the



feasibility of direct utilization of coal electrochemically.  The im-



portant factors for that purpose are:




     •   Cell voltage under current drain





         Effect of temperature





     •   Current efficiency





     •   Gases produced  (CO or CO )





         Effect of ash




With the limited funds available it was possible to evaluate only general



trends  in cell behavior with respect to these  factors.





     In general, the carbon anodes behaved surprisingly well,  and better



than graphite anodes.  The erratic behavior of the reference electrodes



caused  the greatest electrochemical  difficulty, but there was  no  time to



spend on improving their performance.   The mechanical operation of the



cells was relatively straightforward but  could be  simplified by better



design.  The biggest problem was the small leaks that occurred in the



anode gas-handling system.  There was  no  problem with container materials;



alumina seemed  unattacked  after hundreds  of hours  of operation.
                                    33

-------
OPEN CIRCUIT VOLTAGES



     The most reliable operation of the reference electrodes was


observed in the last eight runs (III-P to III-W) during the time that the


various charred coals were tested in the ash-contaminated electrolyte.


These open circuit voltages, given earlier in Table 1, were generally


about -1.1 volts, which is about 0.1 volt greater than theoretical for


graphite.  The greater value may be due to the fact that the carbon in


charred coal is in a thermodynamically less stable state than graphite.


It  is well known that the heat of combustion of coke or amorphous carbon
                                 g
is  greater than that of graphite.


                                                             o
     Theoretical calculations indicated that above about 1000 K the open


circuit voltages should become larger.  With graphite in the absence of


ash, the voltages did increase with temperature (see results of cell II


in  Appendix B).  Because the charred coal anodes showed acceptably small

                          o
polarizations at about 970 K, they were not studied at higher tempera-


tures.



     The voltages observed with graphite before and after ash addition


were not significantly different, although both were uncertain because of


poor reference electrode behavior.  Therefore, to a first approximation


at  least, the ash added to the electrolyte had no effect on open circuit


voltage,  This result tends to be corroborated by the fact that the open


circuit voltages observed in runs with ash present on charred coals


(Runs III-P to III-W) were greater than theoretical.



POLARIZATION STUDIES



     Three phenomena tend to reduce cell voltage when current is passed:


activation polarization, concentration polarization, and IR drop due to


cell resistance.  These phenomena are influenced in different ways by


sweep rate during polarization and by cell temperature, and they can be



                                   34

-------
modified to different degrees by cell design.  For example, activation


polarization reflects a slowness in the chemical reactions occurring at


the electrode surface.  It is a strong function of temperature, decreasing


with increased temperature and possibly mitigated by catalysts.



     In the present work, the charred coals showed an acceptably small

                                     o
activation polarization at about 1000 K.  The resistance or IR drop is


not so sensitive to temperature but is dependent on geometrical factors


in the cell.  The cell resistance was about 0.5 ohm in the present


studies, as measured by fast response (oscilloscope) techniques.  Polari-


zation due to concentration effects was observed in some cells.


Presumably a difference in concentration of some ion(s) between the


anode and reference electrode was generated by passage of  current.  This


effect decreased with increase of temperature as expected  (because


diffusivities of ions increase with temperature).



     The results of polarization  studies were illustrated  earlier  in


Figures  5  to  8  for  triangular-sweep voltametry  and  by  the  voltages


observed during 100 mA  electrolyses reported in Appendix B.   The behavior


of  graphite  is  shown  in Figure  5.  The  curve at 1173°K, except for  the


erratic  reference electrode,  is essentially linear  with little hysteresis,


which  indicates that  IR drop is the predominant source of  polarization.


The slope  of  the curve  is in accord with  the 0.5-ohm cell  resistance.


At  973°K the  substantially larger slope indicates polarization other


than IR,  and the hysteresis of  the  curve  implies that there is signifi-


cant concentration polarization.   At 773°K the polarization is severe.



      For the charred coals at 973°K,  the  fast sweep rate curves (curve A


 of Figures 6, 7, 8) showed a small  degree of hysteresis and a slope


 slightly larger than that corresponding to 0.5 ohm.  After a correction


 for IR drop,  the polarization (activation plus concentration) amounted
                                    35

-------
to about 0.08, 0.15, and 0.1 volts at 100 mA for Peabody char,
Pocahontas, and Illinois No. 6 respectively.
     The presence of concentration polarization with the charred coals
at 973°K is shown by the shift in the curves (from A to B in Figures
6, 7, and 8) as sweep rate decreased.  At the lower sweep rates, the
electrolysis time to reach a given current was greater as was the con-
centration of electrolysis product.  Also the curves immediately after
electrolysis  (curves C of Figures 7 and 8) are shifted in the same
direction, again indicating the effects of concentration.  Some indi-
cation of changing  surface character  (activation effects) were observed
in the scan taken after electrolysis.
     The extent of  steady-state concentration polarization did not alter
significantly as a  result of extended electrolysis, as shown in Figure 7.
The  slow-rate study of concentration polarization taken before electrolysig
(curve B) is essentially the same as the fast rate response, curve C,
taken after several hours of 100-mA electrolysis.  Therefore, even
though the anode area may have changed somewhat during the electrolysis,
and  the composition of the electrolyte might have been expected to change,
neither seemed to cause a noticeable change in concentration polarization
behavior.
     The same behavior is displayed in Figure 8, in which curves A, B,
and  C correspond to data taken for Run III-V at 100 mA.  The level of
concentration polarization does change with the level of current, as
shown by curve D, which was obtained after a 300-mA electrolysis and
which shows greater polarization  than observed at 100 mA.
     To relate the  observed polarization effects to large scale cell
operation, it is necessary to convert the effect of current to  current
densities.  That is, the effective electrode areas need  to be known.
It was estimated that the geometrical anode surface exposed to  the melt
                                    36

-------
                   2
was about 4 to 5 cm .  However, the tips of the electrodes are expected


to have a much greater current density than the sides.  It is difficult



to calculate the exact distribution of the current.  From consideration



of the geometry and current paths involved, we estimate that the anode

                         2
surface area was 2 ± 1 cm  for purposes of scaling current densities.




CURRENT EFFICIENCY



     The efficiency of conversion of the available energy of carbon to


electrical energy is a product of two terms:  the voltage efficiency and


the current efficiency.  The voltage efficiency depends on the activation,


concentration, and resistance  polarization terms, as  discussed above.



The current efficiency is a measure of how effectively the material  is



being used to produce electricity.  As indicated by equations  (5) and


 (6) in Section III,  the quantity of electricity produced  (moles of



electrons) per mole  of carbon  consumed, depends on the course  of the


reaction, which,  in  turn,  is indicated by  the nature  and  amount of the



products.



     Thus,  four  Faradays of electricity are  produced  if  a mole of carbon


 is oxidized  to CO ,  while  only one  is  produced  if  CO  is  the  product.


Therefore,  an important aspect of  this study was to determine  the amounts



of CO  and  CO  produced  at  the  anode  during electrolysis.
             £i



     The current efficiencies  and  relative amounts of CO and CO   for all
                                                               i "

 the runs are shown in Appendix B.   The results  of  some representative


 runs  were  shown  in Figures 9  to 13,  and the results for the  charred coals



 were  summarized  in Table  2.



      The first few runs with  cell III (A to D)  were made with helium in


 the cathode compartment.   When current efficiencies fell to very low


 values,  it was realized that the CO  of the melt had been depleted and
                                    o

 that the melt must have become an electronic conductor by formation of
                                   37

-------
 Ikali metal.  When CO  was passed into the cathode, the current



efficiency rose to essentially 100%.




     The measured current efficiencies were very sensitive to small gas



leaks in the anode gas-handling line.  In Runs III-L and III-O, the low



current efficiencies were caused by such leaks.  In some of the other



runs, the current efficiency was somewhat less than 100% and averaged



about 75%.  Low current efficiencies can arise from either mechanical



losses in the cell due to poor design (i.e., leaks in the anode gas



handling system or the escape of bubbles from the bottom of the anode out



into the cathode region rather than into the anode sheath) or from



physicochemical processes (i.e., electronic conduction by the melt, or



chemical shuttle mechanisms in which anode products diffuse to the



cathode and are reduced).  Limitation of time and funds prevented us



from exploring the true reason for the less than 100% current efficiency.




     The ratio of CO  to CO in the anode gas for all runs is shown in



Appendix B.  The ratio during electrolysis was always larger than



expected from the equilibrium values shown in Figure 3.  The most impor-



tant results pertained to the charred coals, as summarized in Table 2.


                                   o
The equilibrium CO /CO ratio at 975 K is about 0.3  (dependent somewhat
                  £t


on the total pressure of CO  plus CO).  The observed values were from 7
                           £*


to 30 times as large.  It is also apparent that the CO /CO ratio increased
                                                      iZi


with increased current density, and it was larger for graphite than for



the charred coals.  These results indicate that the greater the degree



of irreversibility of the electrochemical oxidation, the larger the



CO /CO ratio.  This fact is important for projection to industrial scale

  ^

operation because it indicates that the greater the current density, the



more effective will be the utilization of the char  (i.e., the more com-



plete its combustion).
                                   38

-------
The results also imply that the process of charring the coal may be


altered so as to result in chars that are electrochemically more active


and therefore give higher cell voltages by 10 to 100 mV.



     The high CO /CO ratio in the cells studied is in accord with obser-
                £

vations in the electrolysis of aluminum.  In the aluminum industry,


carbon (Soderberg electrode) is anodically oxidized in a molten salt


(cryolite) at high temperatures.  The conditions for that process differ


from the present anodic carbon oxidation in two ways:  the temperature


is higher (~ 1300 K),  and the melt has a much lower oxide ion activity.


Both of these factors would be expected to result in CO /CO ratios
                                                       A

smaller than those in our molten carbonate cells, although the anode

                                                           9 10
gas in aluminum electrolysis cells is mainly CO .  Thonstad     has
                                               A

postulated electrochemical mechanisms on carbon surfaces to explain the


C02 production.  Because of the importance of the nature of the gas pro-


duced for operation of the present cells, studies of the mechanism and


methods for optimizing it should be made.
 INFLUENCE  OF ASH




      Ash might be expected  to  affect the  cell by increasing melt viscosity


 and increase the resistance by introducing impurities that poison the


 carbon surfaces.  Activation polarization could also increase by adding


 impurities that reduce current efficiency.



      In cell III, runs from I  to W had 10 wt% fly ash in the electrolyte,


 but there  were no deleterious  effects due to the ash.  The performance


 of graphite anodes seemed unaffected by the ash.  The charred coal anodes


 were tested with ash in the electrolyte only; however,  their superior


 performance, compared with  graphite, indicated that the ash was not


 harmful.  The container and insulators were not corroded after hundreds
                                   39

-------
of hours of use in the presence of ash.  The only unresolved aspect was
the possibility that the iron impurity may have been the cause of the
current efficiencies below 100^; however, equally likely was the
possibility of mechanical loss of anode gas.  That point needs further
resolution.
     The solubility of ash in the molten carbonate is limited, although
unknown at present.  The fact that ash constituents seemed to precipitate
from the melt suggests that, in a large scale cell, ash might be removed
by allowing the melt to become saturated so that additional ash simply
falls  to the bottom of a cell.
                                   40

-------
             VII  EXTENSION OF CONCEPT TO POWER GENERATION





     The goal of this program is to increase the efficiency of utiliza-


tion of the work energy in coal, compared with steam-electric power


generation, by direct production of electricity.  Although the information


required for careful designing is not available, it is instructive to


consider, in a preliminary way, overall systems for using the concept


in power generation.



     Although our results have not defined the exact ratio of CO  and


CO that would be produced in a large scale cell, the system does produce


electricity.  A possible flow chart is shown in Figure 14.  As shown,


the coal would be converted into a usable form for electrodes, and that


process would produce gases, the volatile components of coal.  The


electrodes would be used in the carbon/air fuel cell, and the gases


would be used either in other fuel cells  (using the hydrogen and hydro-


carbons) or as sources of heat.  Technology for some of the steps is


already part of industrial practice.  Carbon monoxide is converted to

                                                 11          12
H  by several commercial processes (see Haddeland   or Savage   or

 2               13
Hottel and Howard   , and Soderberg electrodes are produced for the

                                14
aluminum industry (see Mantell).



     An alternative concept for the use of coal could avoid the fabri-


cation of electrodes.  This approach would use coal of suitable size In


a basket-type electrode suspended in the molten carbonate electrolyte.


In this system, the coal gases, many of which are electrochemically


active, would be consumed directly at the electrode to produce additional


power.
                                  41

-------
        MINE
         I
Coal
     ELECTRODE
    FABRICATION
Coal Gas
  Carbon Electrodes
                                     CARBON/AIR
                                      FUEL CELL
                              Useful Gases
               CONVERSION
                 OF GASES
                                             dc Electrical Power
         HEAT
       SYSTEMS
              HYDROGEN/AIR
                FUEL CELL
 Heat
     Mechanical    dc Electrical
      Power       Power

                    I	
                                                 POWER
                                                INVERSION
  ac POWER
DISTRIBUTION
   SYSTEM
 ac Electricity
                                                              SA-3547-37

    FIGURE  14    FLOWCHART FOR COAL-TO-ELECTRICITY  SYSTEM
                                  42

-------
     The electrochemical cell itself will receive much attention in terms


of design in future engineering studies.  The air cathode must be



engineered to be electrochemically compatible, in terms of current



density, with the anode area.  The hydrostatic pressure of the liquid


electrolyte must be accommodated in the operation of porous, gas


diffusion, air electrodes.  The internal resistance of the electrolyte



must be kept low, and ash removal methods must be incorporated into the



design.




     Whatever the final design of the cell, the anode gases must be


collected, and electronic contact to the carbon anode must be made.  In



the concept envisioned, a conductive and premolded anode is used.  The



thickness of this anode would be determined by mechanical strength and



electrical conductivity requirements.  For immediate purposes, an elec-



trode thickness of two to four centimeters is assumed.




     The rate at which the electrode must supply carbon  is dependent on



the area of the cathode and  the current density.  For a  current density

            2
of 100  mA/cm  , the total current will be 20 A/cm length  of an electrode



immersed to 100 cm.  Thus, the electrode must move down  into the


electrolyte at a rate of about 1 cm/hour, and each 1-meter  length of the


cell would produce 2000 Amperes.




     The current density assumed will  influence  the cell voltage  in two



ways:   activation  and concentration polarization  (assumed to be  200 mV



from the present results) and  resistive  loss.  An anode  to  cathode spacing


of 1 cm would result in a 50-mV  IR  drop  since the melt resistivity is


about 0.5 ohm-cm.  The total operating voltage then would be  approxi-


mately  the 1.1 volts observed  for charred coals minus 0.25  (or 0.85 volts)



From the  observed  current efficiencies  and assuming that only CO  is
                                                                 £t

produced, we  can expect the  efficiency  of  an operating cell to be at


least  80% (however, values close  to 100% can probably be attained).




                                    43

-------
On that basis the cell should produce


                                 96.500 amp sec
         0.85 volts x 0.80 x 4 x 	'	    ,    =73 watt-hours
                                  3,600 sec/hrs


of electricity per gram atom of carbon.  In a conventional steam


generator, the efficiency is about 40% of the heat of coal combustion,


or about 44 watt-hours of electricity is generated per gram atom of


carbon.  The efficiency of the fuel cell is significantly greater


(1.65 times as great).



     Use of the volatile fraction of coal will not be explored in this


discussion.  The pyrolysis of coal to produce coal char has been studied

              8
in some detail ,  anJ. use of the gaseous products is already commercial


practice.



     The subject of ash buildup and removal will require further inves-


tigation.  As a means of evaluating the magnitude of the problem, the


following calculations can be made.  In the cell envisioned above, the

                                            3   2
electrolyte was 1-cm thick,  so there is 1 cm /cm  of electrode, and for

         2             3
100 mA/cm  about 0.1 cm /min of electrode is consumed.  In about two days


of operation, the melt would contain about 10% ash.  If the subsequent


ash is insoluble, it is expected that it will precipitate as alkali


metal silico-aluminate.  The reaction will remove the alkali metal of


the carbonate at a rate of about 5% per day.  For engineering estimates


one can assume that the ash will remove a weight of molten carbonate


from the electrolyte about equal to its own weight.  The alkali metal


from that precipitate can probably be recovered by the same process used

                                         15
in the Kellogg coal gasification concept.
                                   44

-------
                               REFERENCES
1.   Liebhafsky, H. A., and E,  V.  Cairns.   Fuel Cells and Fuel Batteries.
     New York, John Wiley and Sons,  Inc.,  1968.  Chapter 2.

2.   Trachtenberg, Isaac.  Electrode Processes in Molten Carbonate Fuel
     Cells in Fuel Cell Systems,Advances in Chemistry Series 47.
     Washington, D.C., American Chemical Society 1965.  Also, Trachtenberg,
     Isaac, and David F. Cole.   Electrolyte Studies for Molten Carbonate
     Fuel Cells in Fuel Cell Systems - II, Advances in Chemistry Series
     90.  Washington, D.C., American Chemical Society, 1969.

3.   Development of a Molten Carbonate Process for Removal of Sulfur
     Dioxide from Power Plant Stack Gases.  Atomics International
     Company.  Progress Report No. 4 to Environmental Protection Agency.
     July 28, 1971.

4.   Kubaschewski, 0., et al. Metallurgical Thermochemistry, 4th ed.
     Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1967.

5.   Borucka, A., and C. M. Sugiyama.  Thermodynamic Evaluation of the
     O /CO /Au Gas Electrode in Molten Alkali Carbonates.  Electrochim.
     Acta.  13:1887, 1968.

6.   Borucka, A., and C, M, Sugiyama.  Correlation of the Equilibrium
     Potentials and Micropolarization Characteristics of the 0 /CO  and
     CO/CO  Gas Electrodes  in Molten Carbonates.  Electrochim. Acta.
     14:871, 1969.

7.   Appleby, A. J., and S. Nicholson.  The Reduction of Oxygen in Molten
     Lithium Carbonate.  Electro. Anal. Chem. Interfac. Chem.
     53:105, 1974.

8.   Lowry, H. H. Chemistry of Coal Utilization, Supplementary Volume.
     New York, J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1963. p. 497.


9.   Thonstad, J. Critical Current Densities in Cryolite-Alumina Melts.
     Electrochim. Acta. 1967, 12, 1219.
                                    45

-------
10.  Thonstad, J.  The Electrode Reaction on the C, CO  Electrode in
     Cryolite-Alumina Melts.  Electrochim.  Acta.  15: 1569 and 1581,
     1970.

11.  Haddeland, G. E. Hydrogen.  SRI Process Economics Report No. 32A.
     Menlo Park. December 1973.

12.  Savage,  R. L.,  et al. A Hydrogen Energy Carrier.  Vol. II, Report
     of MSA  Grant,  NGT 44-005-114. 1973.

13.  Hottel,  H. C.,  and J. B. Howard.  New Energy Technology.
     Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1971.

14.  Mantell, C. L.   Carbon and Graphite Handbook.  New York.  Inter-
     science  Publishers, 1968.

15.  M. W. Kellogg Company.  Commercial Potential for the Kellogg Coal
     Gasification Process.  R & D Report No. 38, Coal Research. 1968.
                                   46

-------
                     Appendix A





ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES,  SPECIAL ANALYSES,  AND EQUIPMENT
                         47

-------
                               Appendix A



         ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES,  SPECIAL ANALYSES,  AND EQUIPMENT





 CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSES




     The gas chromatograph used was  a  Loenco Company  Model  160  dual-


 column gas chromatograph.  After  studies of conditions, the  following


 was established:
Column 1:  molecular sieve, 0.635-cm o.d. copper tubing,

183-cm long, packed with 5-A 80/10

carrier flow rate of 65.9 cm /min.
         183-cm long, packed with 5-A 80/100 mesh molecular  sieve;
     •   Column 2:  poropak Q  , 0.635-cm o.d. copper tubing packed

         with the Poropak Q  material; carrier flow rate of 30.8

         cm /min.



     •   Detector:  thermal conductivity.



         Detector temperature:  364 K  (91 C) .


                                 o      o
     •   Column temperature:  403 K (130 C) .


                                         o      o
     •   Injection port temperature:  403 K  (130 C) .



     •   Carrier gas:  helium.



     The gases detectable on these columns are indicated in Figure 15.

                           (S)
As indicated, the Poropak Q  (PPQ) column was used to quantitatively


assay CO while the molecular sieve (MS) column was used to assay CO
                                                                   ^2


     Typical calibration curves for CO  and CO are presented in Figure
                                      £1

16.  The curves are presented at attenuation of x 32 (CO) and x 128


(CO ) .  That is,  the sensitivity for detection of these gases can be
   &t

increased 32 and 128 times from the ranges normally used during runs.


Typical elution times and estimated limits of detection are listed in


Table 3.




                                  48

-------
           CO,
        1.4  1.9         3.7
                  TIME — minutes
              (a)   POROPAK Q COLUMN
0   0.8 1.2 1.4 2.0 2.5
                        TIME —  minutes
                 (b)  MOLECULAR  SIEVE COLUMN

               FIGURE 15   ELUTION OF GASES
SA-3547-38
                               49

-------
   10  —
            100     200     300     400

               MICROLITERS INJECTED

                (a)  CARBON DIOXIDE
               500
s100
X

H


H


UJ
I
  50
   10
                    T
T
I
             I
 I
I
I
     0     100     200     300      400     500     600

                  MICROLITERS INJECTED

                  (b)  CARBON MONOXIDE

                                            SA-3547-39



         FIGURE  16    CALIBRATION CURVES
                         50

-------
               Table 3

ELUTION TIMES AND ESTIMATED DETECTION
       LIMITS FOR VARIOUS GASES
t


Gas


Hydrogen
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Methane
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
Water

Porapak Q Column
Elution time


min
-
1.4
1.4
-
1.4
1.9
3.7
Estimated
detection
limit
ml/1000 ml
-
-
-
-
-
0.15
1

Molecular Sieve
Elution time


min
0.8
1.2
1.4
2.0
2.5
30
"
Estimated
detection
limit
ml/1000 ml
10
0.3
0.4
0.05
0.5
200
~

-------
      The  typical chromatographic  procedure was to activate  the instru-
 ment  at the  beginning of  the day, and, during the next two  hours, to
 then  check the  flow  rate  of the carrier gas  in each column.  During that
 period, and  as  free  time  during the day allowed, injections of a check
 mix were  made to assure constancy of chromatographic response.  The
 elution times and chromatographic response were remarkably  constant for
 all gases during the course of this study with the exception of the be-
 havior for carbon monoxide.  The response to this gas varied from day to
 day by as much  as ±  10%,  whereas the response for all other gases varied
 by about  2%.  The behavior of CO during a single day, however, was
 similar to the  constancy  of the other gases.  Since calibration every
 day served to assure accuracy of analysis within 2% error,  no further
 study of  the anomalous behavior of CO was made.

 SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF FLY ASH
     Fly  ash, formed from the combustion of pulverized coal and discharged
 from an electrostatic precipitator,  was used to contaminate the ternary
 carbonate eutectic.   The elemental spectrographic analysis of the ash,
made by the American Spectrographic Laboratories,  Inc.,  San Francisco
California,  on assay ASL #2154,  is given below in weight  percent.
Fe
Al
Ca
K
Mg
B
Ti
Na
Li
Zn
Ba
Cr
V
20
15
4
1
0.6
0.6
0.85
0.5
0.1
0.1 (?)
0.06
0.02
0.02
Sr
Mn
Cu
Zr
Ni
Mo
Co
Ga
Y
Sc
Be
Pb

0.02
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.002
<0.005

                     Si  +  nondetectables:  Balance
                                  52

-------
PROXIMATE ANALYSES OF COAL SAMPLES







     Samples of four types of coal were obtained from Commercial Testing



and Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois.  Analyses of these coals, as



provided by Commercial Testing and Engineering, are given below.
PEABODY CHAR

% Moisture
% Ash
% Volatile
% Fixed carbon

Btu/lb
% Sulfur
As received
7.55
13.01
8.92
70.52
100.00
11,396
1.46

Dry basis
	
14.07
9.65
76.28
100.00
12,327
1.58
POCAHONTAS

% Moisture
% Ash
% Volatile
% Fixed carbon

Btu/lb
% Sulfur
As received
2.33
4.37
25.42
67.88
100.00
14,702
0.41
Dry basis
..
4.47
26.03
69.50
100.00
15,053
0.42
                                     53

-------
ILLINOIS NO. 6 SEAM

% Moisture
% Ash
% Volatile
% Fixed carbon

Btu/lb
% Sulfur
As received
7.07
8.56
32.82
51.55
100.00
12,342
1.84
Dry basis
_.
9.21
35.32
55.47
100.00
13,281
1.98
    DECKER MINE

% Moisture
% Ash
% Volatile
% Fixed carbon

Btu/lb
% Sulfur
As received
22.51
5.40
29.42
42.67
100.00
9,513
0.34
Dry basis
__
6.97
37.97
55.06
100.00
12,277
0.44
         54

-------
LIST OF PRINCIPAL ELECTROCHEMICAL EQUIPMENT








Three dual-channel strip-chart recorders Mosely 2100B





Potentiostat, Princeton Applied Research Corporation, Model 173





Wave-form generator, Princeton Applied Research Corporation, Model 175





x-y Recorder, Hewlett Packard, Model 7035B





Conductivity bridge, Philips Corporation, Model GM 4249





Electrometer, Keithly, Model 610A





Programmable power supply, New Jersey Electric Company, Model SVC 40-5





Oscilloscope, Tektronix, Model 535A
                                    55

-------
      Appendix B





RECORD OF EXPERIMENTS
         56

-------
                                                                               Table 4.  RECORD Of  EXPERIMENTS  PERFORMED
01
-J


I


II







III



















A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
A
B
C
D
E
T
G

H
I
j
K
L
O
P


II
f
T

U

V
w


Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Graphite
Peabadr"
•""1*

Peabodjr' •
Peabadr"
Peabody- •
Pea body*
Peabody"
Pocahnntas
Pocahontaa
Illinois'"
llltnot«'"
Ash
Preaent

-
-
:
_
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
_
_
«
+
,
•





.
4
t
4
f

Temperature

838
733
943
1053
656
865
973
1031
1031
973
1051
1176
773
773
1163
1163
8*1
871
973
1078
1078
1183
1183
793
9T3

11M
M3
9(1
•73
1169
1189
877


833
1040
971
982
9*2
9*5
985
974
973

565
460
670
7«0
383
592
TOO
758
758
TOO
778
9O3
500
500
890
890
608
588
TOO
•OS
•OS
•10
910
520
TOO
•95
•95
T10
701
700
MM
•96
•04


560
770
•»»
709
TO9
T12
T12
T01
TOO
Voltage, Anode
Veraua Reference
Open
Circuit

-0.86
-0.57
-O.74
-1.O3
-1.28
-1.16
-1.15
-1.13
-1.18
-1.10
-1.16
-1.15
-0.65
-0.97
-1.06
-1.45
-1.05
-O.IS
-O.92

-0.26
-0.81
-O.69
-0.47
-1.07
-0.74
-1.10


-0.9«
-1 .08
-1.12
-1.08

-1 .10

-1.13
-1.09
At 100 aA

-0.19
0
-0.52
-0.76
-0.50
-0.78
-0.77
• -0.95
-1.10
-0.84
-0.88
-1.10
-0.08
-O.O4
-0.85
-0.45
-0.1
-0.08
-0.57


•0.3
tO.OS

tO.Oft to -0.55
-0.28 to -0.38
-o.es
-1.10


Too erratic
-0.94
-0.9
-0.7>
-0.55
-1.10
-0.74
-1.13
-O.IS to -0.43
Gaa Composition
Before Electrolysis
Fraction
Co.












.014
,002
.OO3
.OO9
.027

.017
.002
.023
.109
,OO6
.031
.017
.090
.005


,O1O
.168
.172
.021

.OBI

.042
.073
Fraction
CO












.057
*
.009

.114
•
.004
.407
.OO3
.006
.OO2
.477
.


.102
OO6
.004

.030

.037
.010
Ratio
CO./CO












.035
3.0

.150

5.75
.268
2.0O
3.17
».50
.189



1 65
12.0
5.25

2.03

1.14
7.3
During
Fraction
CO,












.314
.003
.OO5
. OO6
.272
.280
.260
.056
.056
.033
.316
.250
.170
.152
.021
.196
.223
.Ot)4
.OHH
.432


. 223
. 174
.233
. 161
.324
.182
.445
.183
.441
Electrolyal*
Fraction
CO












.059
.266
.038
.024
.275
.232

.480
.536
.001
.OO5
.487
.303
•


207
.016
.037
.034
.078
.049
.082
.O4K
Ratio
CO./CO












.051
.019
6.84
2.33
.204
.142

.354
.284
21.0
38.2
74.3
.183
.171



.K41
14. e
4. 3D
9.33
2.46
V.UH
2.23
9.18
Electralyala
Current
•A












100
100
300
100
100
100
100
20
100
50
100
100
1OO
200
100
100
100
100
3OO
100

a 00
100
100
kOO
200
too
3OO
10O
3OO
Current
Efficiency












112
1.2
14
2
93
93
»7,5
5H. 1
52. H
60. 1
105
81 .6
1O4
74 . 9
5.3
62.2
70.3
H.'.>
'2. 0
HM,<*

73 . 2
43.0
AH . U
5S . 7
74 , 4
67 . ft
82 . H
7O. *>
77 , 0
Remarks
Cells I and II were
designed tor anode
volt a tie studies only.
Analyses ui anode
with cells I and II.







Runs III AtoD: Prubatale
interference to perfor-
mance by alkali metals
deposited at cathode.
Huns til E to N:
Reference electrode
crrat ic .


Added ash tu ele^lro-
lyle at Hun I 1 1- 1 .


PrubMblu leak in Mytttum.
Standard procedure
f inml 1 /oil »n ol Hun
I I I -0 .
b«unk (1 1 m ovpifd In
nystvm.









            Value*  **re less than O.O01

            Peahodr char.

           •Illlaols lo. 6 aval.

-------
                                 TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read /imnelions on the reverse before completing)
 I. REPORT NO.
 EPA-650/2-75-040
                            2.
                                                       3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 Direct Use of Coal in a Fuel Cell: Feasibility
    Investigation
                                       5. REPORT DATE
                                       June 1975
                                       6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHORSRobert D. Weaver, Laura Tietz, and
             Daniel Cubicciotti
                                                       8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NC,
                                                       Project PYU-3547
9. PERFORMING OR9ANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Stanford Research Institute
Menlo Park,  CA  94025
                                       10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                       1AB013; ROAP 21BJV-024
                                       11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                       68-02-1808
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 EPA, Office of Research and Development
 NERC-RTP,  Control Systems Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                          IOD COVERED
                                       13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD CO
                                       Final; 6/26/74 - 2/28/75
                                       14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACTThe rep()rt gives results of the first phase of a study of the feasibility of
 using coal to produce electricity directly in a fuel cell that uses a molten-carbonate
 electrolyte, a coal anode, and an air cathode. The cell voltage, the polarization of the
 anode, and the nature of the gaseous products formed were  investigated. Electrodes
 made from charred coal yielded open-circuit voltages close to 1 V. At 975 K,  the
 activation plus concentration polarization was about 200 mV at current densities of
 100 mA per sq cm and larger. At higher temperatures smaller polarizations were
 observed. The gaseous anode products were primarily CO2, with some  CO. Current
 efficiencies were somewhat less than 100 percent. The low values were  possibly due
 to losses of anode gases by mechanical means.  Coal ash added to the  molten electro-
 lyte did not appear to be deleterious to cell operation.  Descriptions of possible
 future engineering systems and thermodynamic limitations are presented.
 7.
                              KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
                          b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C, COSATI Field/Group
 Air Pollution
 Fuel Cells
 Coal
 Anodes
 Molten Salt
    Electrolytes
 Carbonates
Cathodes
Sulfur Oxides
Nitrogen Oxides
Dust
Air Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Air Cathode
Particulates
13 B
10B
2 ID
09A

07D
07B
11G
 3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT


 Unlimited
                          19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                          Unclassified
                         21. NO. OF PAGES

                                 64
                          20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                          Unclassified
                                                   22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                        58

-------