United States
         Environmental Protection
         Agency
             Office of
             Solid Waste and
             Emergency Response
r»
  EPA
DIRECTIVE NUMBER: 9433.03(84)

TITLE: Delisting of Spent Pickle Liquor Generated from the
    Porcelain Enamel Industry
          APPROVAL DATE: -10-23-84

          EFFECTIVE DATE: io-23-84

          ORIGINATING OFFICE:  Osw

          Q FINAL

          D DRAFT

           LEVEL OF DRAFT

             DA — Signed by AA or DAA
             D B — Signed by Office Director
            - D C — Review & Comment ,
                           j
                           *'
          REFERENCE (other documents):
 WER       OSWER       OSWER
 DIRECTIVE    DIRECTIVE    Dl

-------
PART 260  SUBPART C - RULEMAKING PETITIONS
                                                DOC:  9433.03(84)
Key Words:

Regulations

Subject:


Addressee:


Originator:

Source Doc:

Date:

Summary:
Pickle Liquor, Exclusions

40 CFR 260.20, 260.22

Delisting of Spent Pickle Liquor Generated from the Porcelain
Enamel Industry

John C. Oliver, Porcelain Enamel Institute, Inc.,
1911 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington, VA  22209

Matthew Straus, Chief, Was-te Identification Branch

09433.03(84)

10-23-84
     Spent pickle liquor (as well as any sludge generated from the treatment of
the spent pickle liquor) that is generated from the porcelain enamel industry
is listed as EPA Hazardous Waste No. K062.  An industry-wide rulemaking peti-
tion must be submitted in order to change the regulatory status of the waste.
An industry-wide petition does not apply to plants that are integrated with
electroplating operations and generating wastes -covered by the F006-F009
listing.

     EPA lists the specific inorganic and organic waste constituents that
should be analyzed as representative samples from porcelain enamel facilities
to support an industrywide exclusion petition.

-------
 "r. John C. Oliver
 ...       	*:y«r Drive
 Arlington, Virginia  22209

 Dear John:
 liquor liscing  co  be  che  correcc  -eadin;   f  5uCh? S?enc  ?ickle
 regulations.  Therefore.  thls^nc  -?c-L  f i Ch°  h^2ard^  wa3ce
 any sludge generated  froo  che  crear«fnP V  ?U°r (a3 veli  «
 liquor) chac is ge'neraceS  f?oiu  c?e  n       , ^ 8?6nC ?Lckle
 is considered co be a listed hazard
 Hazardous Wasce No. K062   Tn « J
 change che regulawr-/ a           '
 3ub=ir an IndSacry^Sd
 requc.sc.  we havc-aade a
 or planca  co be  sanpled
 woula  need co be -eviluat-d
 pectcion  for ch« ProceLln
 che pecicion should address
 $260.20.   We vould  noc
 applying  co  planes  "
                             «
         enaael  industry
  waste—namely,  EPA
       industry co
       chey will  need  co
       .!/.  Ac your
       inc of the  ni
    Coxiconts that
 an industry-wide exclusion
Category.  in addition,
        cited in 40 CFR
        petition as
Independently.
                                          co l=e evaluated
Industry you will need to
Integrated
H«c. are
che circu=3canc«
        fron a lesser
                                                    e of
                                          8aople of che
                                    ln"Sra«
-------
  the petition would not be addressing porcelain enamel planes
  chat are integrated wch electroplating operacions.) These
  figures were determined using an approximate sampling rule
  developed by OSHA.  This type of sanpling approach his been
  successfully used in che past by che Institute for Scrap
  Iron and Steel in a similar study for EPA.   The actual number
  ot samples  whi.cn should be analyzed cannot  be identified  as
  precisely.   However  a sufficient number of samples should
  be taken trom each facility which would  represent the" variable
  nature of che waste.   In this regard,  composited  samples
  representing any variability in raw materials or  process  .  -  •
         *          approach in minimizing the overall  analytical
 numhF    rh        a^Ould  include  ^termination of a limited
 number of both  inorganic  and organic constituents and tests
 ror  the tour hazardous waste characteristics  (i.e.  ignitabilitv
 corroswlcy, reactivity,  and Extraction ProcedurTCEP? toxicityf'
 The  specinc constituents . that  should be analyzed for in
 wastes are as follows:                        7
 Category

 Inorganic
 Categoir/

 Organic
            y
 Constituent

 Chromium
 Lead
 Nickel'
 Cadm i urn
 Selenium

 Constituent

 Carbon tetrachloride
 Chloroethane
 Chloroform
 Chloromethane
 1-dichloroethylene
 crans 1,2-dichloroethylene
 Dichloromethane
 1,2-dichloropropane
 1,3-dichloropropylene - •
Tetra chloroehtanes
Tetrachloroethylene
y  The metals should be analyzed using the Extraction Procedure
    (EP) toxicity test and for their total metal content.

-------
             .
  -   /             .              ;  3         '           •-.:.- .
•  V          ..--._..-.                  v -          .     ;. ,
" /                   •  •       .Trichloropropane           . •
  '      • "    '                  HechyL ethyl ketone   '
 f                 ~           .-.'•• Methyl isobutyl Ice tone '
-'      '  . • .                     • Benzene            '           • " .    '
                                 Ethyl Benzene      .-  ..
                                 Toluene   .-..-.  ..-  .  ,    •         ..
                                 Xylenea .         .  •/•'•.       .  ' .  .^. ,

     The  organic coaactcuenca were selecced due  co  che likelihood     ; -
     chac boch halogenaced and non-halogenaced «olvenca are used   .   '
     ac incegraced faciliciea. and chac cheae facilities  are doing
     paincing operations.- Kovever, if you hava  inforaacion which     "'
     would indicate that aotae of these toxicants 'are  not  expected  ,-.
     to be in the waace froa integrated facilities,^we will consider'/.
     this inforraation to deteraine vhecher analysi3**for these .   -..-'"
     contaninanta is necessary.  We will require thac-all theae  -     ''
     contaninants (i.e., organic and inorganic toxicants)  be     -.  ;'"'
     analyzed for at che ZD integrated facilities; 'however,' since  '  '"
     the  non-integrated facilities are noc expected to"concain      '  •
     significant .levels of organics. .we will only require that
  ..  . two  of the five'non-integrated facilities b« analyzed for '      "
   " the  organics.  All five non-integrated facilities should be
     analyzed for the inorganic contaminants. ' Test methods for -
   • these constituencs- are provided in the Methods Manual "Tesc
     Methods  for Evaluating Solid Waste " SW-846. '.rL  • '.   .    •  "

          We  believe it is. in the industry's besc interest-to.    '
     proceed-.with a delisting," whether or not it pursues  the
     pending" litigation.  E?A will expedite processing of the  .      •
     petition no aatter^how the litigation 'is proceeding.   .If you .
   "  decide to aove forward with an industry-wide petition and •   •   •••
     need specific information on saapling and analysis aechods/  .   ..*
    ' pleaae- call Jia Poppiti at ;(202) -382-4690*  ' . - '^^-:  "•  .  • . :   .
         • " .-*•• •  '     ^ *    *"*" *   '•--.. . • *- 'f   /'      '•'*••          *
         •'."••••      ••"•'"*'•'•'"•« j •'"  %  '' ••           .       "        • •
    '••'.'  ••       :"    ''...':..   Sincerely,  .   . •  ..   ;••    *      \
                     !.   Matthew Straua, Chief    *   •  '-    .
     '."".-  .   .'•'  .  .  '"  Waste Identification Branch .  :'^-./

                     '.'••  ' ' ''••'•      \    •'    \     ' '
     WH-562B/JPOPPITI/pes/475-8551/10-23-34/Disk:-.JP840l20 '
                           ^   .  -    .   .•-*    . * "     '    I
                                                                               '
                                                                             - f

-------