ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SEMINAR
           UPGRADING
    METAL FINISHING FACILITIES
      TO REDUCE POLLUTION
           IN-PROCESS
POLLUTION ABATEMENT PRACTICES
        NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK
            DECEMBER, 1972
       OXY METAL FINISHING CORPORATION
         ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES GROUP
           MADISON HEIGHTS, MICHIGAN
              amp

-------
                                  INTRODUCTION

   The  threat of air and  water pollution to the welfare of the United  States  has been
recognized  only  in  recent years. The task of determining just how industrial wastes  ad-
versely  alter the environment is still fraught with unknowns, because this  work also has
just begun.

   Clear to the  metal finishing industry is the  fact that its wastes are detrimental to  the
environment. The industry  wonders about the extent of the detriment, the reasoning behind
regulatory  correctional  measures, and the steps which industry must take to  make per-
manent peace with the environment and still continue to use it.

   This paper intends only to assist the metal finisher to understand where his pollution
begins,  how  to  reduce it, and having done  so, to have a proper assemblage of facts  ac-
cumulated  so that  his future endeavors at pollution  control are not  just self-serving,  but
technologically sound, and not inclined to obsolescence.
IS METAL FINISHING REALLY NEEDED?

   Neither the metal finishing industry  nor the importance of its products to the Amer-
ican way of life are very well understood  by the public. This  is simply  because metal-
finished  components, though they add to the attractiveness of a major product and enable
it to become functional, in the end  receive little  attention,  and the significance  of their
contribution is lost. When the buyer admires  the  beauty, reliability,  comfort, performance
and/or corrosion resistance  of his purchase,  he does  not  single  out  the  metal  finished
parts for commendation. Yet during all  his  waking hours,  wherever he may be, he  has
unwittingly come into contact with literally thousands of items which  required metal finish-
ing or have metal-finished parts.  They have become so much  a part of his  daily routine
that he  tends  not to notice  them . .  .  the alarm clock, his  tie pin,  and belt buckle,  a
drawer pull, the  silverware,  coffee  pot, toaster,  stove, dishwasher, refrigerator,  lamps,
doorknobs, bathroom fixtures, telephones, radios, TV sets, his tools,  automobile,  even  the
bridgework in his mouth . .  . none of these are possible without metal finishing. Industry
itself,  computerized, highly sophisticated by automation techniques,  must rely on electro-
plated printed  circuits,  chrome plated dies,  electroformed devices, cold  formed parts made
possible  by phosphate  lubricity . . . indeed, it is held together  by plated  fasteners as  is
our entire modern  world. With this  in mind, the preservation of  the environment is  not
likely  to be achieved by having metal finishing vanish from the American  scene.  (Though
the  term "metal  finishing"  implies that  the basis materials  to be "finished" are  all
metallic  in nature, we  have included, as a matter of convenience, plastic  basis  materials
in this terminology, as  plating on plastics has become a representative portion of the metal
finishing industry.)
 WHAT IS METAL-FINISHING?

    Metal Finishing is utilized to improve the surface of a basis material by:

       1. Cleaning it.

       2. Hardening or softening it.

                                           1

-------
      3. Smoothing or roughening it.

      4. Depositing another metal on it by chemical exchange.

      5. Electroplating another metal or series of metals on it.

      6. Converting its surface by chemical deposition.

      7. Coating it with organic materials.

      8. Electrocoating it with organic materials.

      9. Oxidizing by electrolysis.

   These processes are more familiarly  known as cleaning and pickling,  annealing,  case
hardening, polishing,  buffing, immersion  plating, electroplating, phosphating,  conversion
coating, oxidizing, painting, electropainting, and anodizing.

   The  corresponding  changes  produced by  these  methods  of metal finishing upon  the
basis material serve to enhance the value of the treated item by providing such improve-
ments as:

      1. Corrosion resistance.

      2. Durability.

      3. Esthetic appearance.

      4. Electrical conductivity.

   Such  processes  also  fill  many special  engineering  requirements of industry such  as
stress relief, ductility, heat  resistance,  or  the ability  to stamp and form metal objects.


TYPE OF METAL FINISHERS

   The metal finishing industry may  be considered in three segments: large captive shops,
small captive shops, and job shops.

   The  large captive shop is usually  a  division of, or operated by,  a major manufacturer
whose product requires  metal finished  items in quantity.  These shops are  to be found
generally  in the automotive and appliance industries and are noteworthy because of the
size of their metal finishing facilities and the magnitudes of their  daily production and
chemical consumption.

   The small captive  shops are usually minor  adjuncts to  their parent industries. Their
roles are  to supply metal finished incidentals to the principal  products.  An example of
this type of captive shop might be found  in  the machine tool  industry or in  many of the
sports equipment manufacturing companies.

   Where  large corporations  find it impractical to maintain their  own  captive  metal  fin-
ishing operations,  the job  shops  serve as sources  for  satisfying their requirements for
metal finished parts.

-------
   The job shops exist solely  on profits accrued  from metal finishing.  Jobs are  accepted
for metal  finishing on a  contract basis,  and the job shop owner must be prepared to
serve a variety of industries.

   His role does not end  with the finishing of his customer's wares. For survival,  he is
required to keep abreast of all changes  in  metal finishing technology  and his products'
end-use requirements,  thus serving  his customers as  supplier, inspector, and  counsel, a
role which they themselves are loathe to countenance technically or endure  financially.


CHEMICALS AND BASIS MATERIALS USED IN THE
METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY

   Though the list of chemicals (See Appendix, Fig.  1)  is  not guaranteed  to be compre-
hensive, it represents  the  great majority  of potential  pollutants  with which we  are con-
cerned as we consider plant waste control planning.

   The types  and quantities of materials and chemicals purchased furnish an  excellent
key toward prediction of the process  effluent characteristics. They also act as cross-checks
on the accuracy of effluent  analyses. An  attempt has  been  made to indicate the expected
environmental impacts of these materials when they become waterborne.


PROCESSING EQUIPMENT USED IN THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY

   It  is not convenient to the scope of this report to discuss entirely  the great  diversity
of equipment  used in  metal  finishing. It is  assumed that the  reader needs  no further
description of  the type of  processing which  is performed  by hand through a great variety
of tank-and-vat assemblies. Rather,  it is hoped that the  following scan  of commonly used
automated equipment will  enlighten and also invite increased awareness of the difficulties
to be met and resolved during the application of pollution control technology  and  equip-
ment  to the metal finishing facility.

   As is seen  in Figures 2 through 7, (Appendix) the applicability of any of the  automat-
ic finishing machines is directly dependent upon the  quantity of production required in  a
given length of time, the physical shape of the work pieces  and the means by which they
are to be fixtured  for processing, and, of  course, the nature of the  metal finishing re-
quired. From work  pieces  so tiny that they may  scarcely be observed by the eye to items
weighing  many tons apiece,  all may  be processed  in  variations of  this basic line of
equipment.

    From  the effluent control  standpoint,  the type of machine chosen  to be the most ef-
fective in fulfilling the desired production requirements will also  have a marked  effect on
the nature of-the effluent and the cost to  handle it.  For  example, if  a  return-type auto-
matic is to be selected, it is  convenient  and  inexpensive to  incorporate  counterflow rins-
ing, as the rinse tanks are very small, handle only a rack or two  at a time, and  do not
add a  costly  and- lengthy enlargement  to  the  prospective  machine.  Programmed  hoist
equipment requires rinse tanks large enough to handle a battery  of racks, or a  single rack
of long parts. To  incorporate more  rinse tanks so  that  counterflow  water conservation
tactics  may be employed  inevitably implies larger  initial  capital  outlays. On the  other
hand, the motion of the hoist in transporting the work may be much more adaptable than

-------
the return-type automatic to delayed dwells in the "up" position, or to  repeated dunkings
of the work in the same rinse before moving on to the next process.

   With existing equipment, any  rearrangements which  may lend themselves to chemicals
and water  conservation techniques  should also  be closely considered for what effect they
may have on:

      a.  Cost to make the change.

      b.  Cycle reprogramming.

      c.  Foundation updating.

      d.  Busswork and piping.

      e.  Ventilation.

      f.  Structural supports.
SOME METHODS FOR REDUCING OR ELIMINATING CHEMICAL WASTE
IN METAL FINISHING

I Process Substitution:

   Wholesale  substitution of low-concentration  processes for those of high concentration
or processes containing non-toxic  materials  for those  containing  toxic constituents  has
commenced  only  in recent years, inspired undoubtedly by  the  advent of pollution  control
requirements.  Unfortunately, the chemicals contained in the time-honored  processes which
made the greatest contribution  to  a  profitable  and efficient metal finishing job were  in-
variably the same chemicals causing the greatest  adverse  impacts to  the environment as
wastes in the plant effluents.

   Substitution, therefore, became  practical only when  it did not compromise  the  quality
of the metal finishing and was able to produce an environmental benefit. Perhaps the  most
well known type  of substitution in  the past few years has  involved cyanide plating baths,
principally those  related to zinc. Elimination or reduction of cyanide was obtained by using
non-cyanide or low-cyanide-type processes. The non-cyanide baths offered  complete  free-
dom from cyanide but many of these processes employed chelating and sequestering  addi-
tion agents to keep the zinc in  a soluble form (one of the jobs formerly performed so well
by the  cyanide.)  Treatment of the  resulting effluent hence  became virtually impossible as
no means  was at hand  to remove  the equally  undesirable  zinc  from the waste water
stream. Since cyanide was  also a  good  cleaner, the first few minutes  of dwell-time in the
cyanide plating bath were  cheerfully accepted as  cleaning  time  to complete the job  only
perfunctorily performed by the previous  cleaning and  pickling cycle. Without any cyanide,
substantial  improvements were required  in  the pre-plating treatment steps to achieve  good
metal finishing quality. Many different  types of non-cyanide processes are now  available.
Applicability  of  these processes must be weighed  with due consideration of effluent im-
provement and process operational changes.

-------
   The low cyanide processing solutions  obviously  do not offer complete relief from  the
onus of cyanide in the effluent, but they can account  for a substantial reduction in usage
(90% is achievable) and an equally substantial improvement in effluent quality. These baths
are not really substitutes  but dilute  versions of the baths they "replace." Tighter process
control is generally required when these baths  replace conventional cyanide  processes,  but
the use of chelates may be  avoided and the zinc disposal problem a solvable issue.


   Other substitutes have found use in the industry. They are:

      a.  Non-phosphate cleaners.

      b.  Non-chromium bearing dips (in conversion coatings and anodizing.)

      c.  Non-cyanide stripping solutions.

      d.  Non-chromium bearing bactericides for cooling waters.

      e.  Non-cyanide gold and copper processes.


   Some guideline  questions should always be  considered  when  substitution  is  contem-
plated ...

      a.  Will I eliminate one effluent problem and create another?

      b.  Do I fully understand the control problems which might accompany the change?

      c.  Have I sufficient man-hours available to handle tighter control requirements?

      d.  Will the substitution affect in any way the final quality of my product?

      e.  May  I expect  an increase  in  cost  in my operation,  or will I experience  a
         saving?

      f.  If I  already have a waste treatment facility, what effect will the  substitution
         have on the treatment system when it is mixed with my normal waste flows?

      g.  Did I overlook any unforeseen ventilation or OSHA-related problem?

      h. Have I calculated the cost of changing  my equipment to accept  the substitute
         process?



 II Process Solution Concentration — Minimum Limits:

    Most processes  offer a range of concentrations in which they may be operated  suc-
 cessfully. The industry  has traditionally selected  the  midpoint in these ranges  as the
 operating concentration.  With  effluent standards and cost  savings in mind,  serious  con-
 sideration should  be applied to operating the process solutions  at  their minimum  con-
 centrational limits. As  an example,  a standard nickel plating solution has the  following
 composition limits:

-------
                                                                 OPERATING
        CHEMICAL                   RANGE              CONCENTRATION

Nickel Sulfate (NiS04.6H20)           40 to 50 oz./gal.                 45 oz./gal.

Nickel Chloride (NiC12.6H20)          8 to 12 oz./gal.                  10 oz./gal.

Boric Acid (H3B03)                  6.0 to 6.5 oz./gal.                 6.3 oz./gal.

   At the above operating concentrations,  a typical small plating shop running  an aver-
age of twelve hours per day and two hundred and fifty days per year would experience an
annual loss of nickel salts (due to dragout)  of approximately 8500  Ib. Nickel  Sulfate and
1900  Ib.  Nickel Chloride (based  on  the processing of  600  square feet/hour  and  a con-
servative dragout  rate  of  1.5  gal/1000  square  feet.)  Had  minimum  concentrations been
used  for  the year, the resultant saving  in Nickel Salts would have been 950  Ibs.  Nickel
Sulfate and 375 Ib.  Nickel Chloride or a  saving of about eight hundred dollars.  If this
shop  applied the same thinking to the other  process solutions in the plating line, a major
improvement in operating costs is readily  obtainable.  Not considered in the improvement
is the potential cost savings in  effluent treatment. All metal  finishing operations merit
this  type of assessment. If  minimum  concentration  limits become  the practice,  tighter
process control should be expected and  accommodated.  Likewise, any possibility of a re-
duction in product quality due to mediocre process performance should be evaluated.

Ill Control of Dragout

   Dragout is defined by KUSHNER1 as "the volume of solution carried over the edge of
a  process tank by an emerging piece of work." There are several factors which  influence
the rate of dragout. They are:

      a.  Velocity of withdrawal of the work pieces.

      b.  The geometry of the  work pieces.

      c.  The positioning of the pieces on the rack or fixture.

      d.  The drainage time allowed over the process tank.

      e.  The viscosity and density of the process solution.

      f.  The temperature of the solution.

   Many devices may  be  successfully  used  for  dragout reduction. The velocity of with-
drawal of work from the process tank is least controllable when  the  metal finishing cycle
is operated by  hand because of human fatigue. An excellent method of circumventing this
obstacle  is to place a bar or rail above  the  process tank where the rack may be suspend-
ed for drainage while  its predecessor  is  removed  from the rail  and  transported  to  the
next  phase of the finishing cycle. If, however, the equipment is automated, withdrawal may
frequently  be slowed, without a subsequent  loss of production, by  reorganizing machine
motion.  (Vendors  of metal  finishing  machines  can assist  on these motion  studies.) No
standard rule is available to accurately predict the amount of dragout volume to be saved
by a given reduction in withdrawal  speed; noteworthy  only is that a saving may  be ex-
pected, the degree to be determined by the specific application.

-------
   When the purchase  of new equipment is  being considered, withdrawal  and drainage
times should merit close attention before a final  design  is chosen. This is  especially  im-
portant when related to bulk  processing  or  barrel plating.  Slow barrel rotation  during
withdrawal has  reduced dragout  volumes by  as much  as 50%. Machines may be readily
automated to accommodate this type of rotation at the time of design.

   In general, as  the chemical content of a  solution is increased, its  viscosity  increases,
resulting in a thickening of the film  clinging to work withdrawn from the process solution,
and  thus contributing not only to a  larger volume of dragout, but more chemical wastage
in that volume, and increased difficulty with subsequent rinsing.

   Temperature  also has an effect on dragout. Elevating the operating  temperature of  a
process solution will  result in diminished  dragout by reducing  viscosity. Care must be
exercised, when  increasing temperatures,  that bath performance remains unimpaired  and
that the work pieces acquire no adverse surface conditions such as dry-on patterns.

   A dilemma  historically plaguing the metal finisher,  especially in electroplating,  has
always been  the positioning of work pieces on a rack.  The primary consideration in rack-
ing is proper exposure of the work to the anodes so that the  coverage and  thickness  uni-
formity of the electrodeposit  may  be  optimum.  Drainage and rinsability  figure  in  the
racking deliberations because of possible damage  to the work  piece surface by insufficient
or inefficient rinsing, or to succeeding  process solutions  by drag in of unremoved chemi-
cals from the  previous  solution.  A  contemporary  consideration of chemical wastage  is
now made more critical by potential  effluent treatment costs. There is  even  the  possibility
that the reduction of this  wastage  (and its attendant  effluent purification  costs)  may in
some  cases  make the  incipient difficulties   of  poorer  coverage and plate distribution
acceptable.

   Maintenance of racks, fixtures, and  rack  coatings,  as an  industry average, has been
generally poor. Transport of chemicals from  one  process to others underneath  loose rack
coatings is  not  uncommon. Chromium-bearing solutions,  for  example,  appearing in plant
effluents in  spite of treatment systems designed to handle the normal chromium discharge
sources,  have been traced to rinse tanks and process solutions  remotely located from the
chromium discharge points, having arrived in these areas by the loose rack coating route.
Increased attention to rack  maintenance will  not  only  eliminate this potential hazard, but
it is certain  to contribute to a welcome reduction in the numbers of work  pieces rejected
because of poor contact.

    KUSHNER1 has summarized dragout loss reduction principles with ten rules:

       1. Keep  the concentrations of all dissolved  materials at the minimum value  req-
         uisite to the proper operation of the bath.

       2. Do not add anything to a plating bath that does not perform a necessary function
         in the same.

       3. Operate the plating bath as hot as possible.

       4. If there  is a choice of  conducting salts  that can be  used in  a  plating bath,  use
         the salts that give  the  greatest density and  the  smallest viscosity per  unit
         concentration.

-------
      5.  Make use of an effective wetting agent in the plating bath.

      6.  With  a given,  fixed  time  period  allowed for withdrawal  and drainage, use  the
         largest part of the period for withdrawal.

      7.  For minimum  dragout,  rack  solid objects so that  they  are extended in area
         rather than in depth.

      8.  Do not rack objects  directly above each  other so as  to  lengthen the drainage
         path.

      9.  Tilt all solid objects  with  plane or singly  curved  surfaces so that drainage flow
         is consolidated.

     10.  Every solid  object,  outside of a sphere,  has  at least  one position  in  which
         dragout will be at a minimum.

   Significant  chemical losses are  also encountered  in  connection with  the  batch puri-
fications of process  solutions in external storage tanks and the  repacking  of process filter
equipment.  Process  liquids  entrapped in  sludges  and  in  discarded filter packs  are  re-
coverable by the simple expedient of flushing with water and returning the water, properly
filtered  back  to  the  process  to replace  evaporation  losses.  Such a  practice  becomes
doubly valuable when the eventual  disposal of  the  sludges remaining after purification is
considered,  as  the presence  of soluble  metals or other toxic  materials in these  residues,
by today's standards, is generally forbidden by  regulations  for the disposal of solid  wastes
to landfill sites.
PLANNING TO PREVENT POLLUTION CATASTROPHES

   There is, of course,  a great difference between the type of pollution  which  causes  a
nuisance to the public domain by gradually altering the environment to which it  has been
discharged, and a catastrophic  pollution which causes not only a  sudden and far-reaching
change in  the  environment,  but also poses a  direct and immediate threat  to  the  health of
aquatic life and humans.

   In  the  metal finishing plant, nuisance pollution is characterized by the daily flow of
waste  rinse  waters  to the sewer, usually coupled  with  small-volume spillages incurred in
work piece transport between processes or  during the addition of maintenance chemicals
to the processes  themselves. Spent  process solutions  gradually  discharged along with
waste  rinse waters may also be considered nuisance pollution.

   On  the other hand, process solutions, containing  concentrated toxic materials,  dis-
charged suddenly and in large  volume to the sewer,  constitute potential catastrophic pol-
lution.  When  these discharges  are deliberate,  they result  from human carelessness  and
error,  and may be  eliminated  only by stringent  in-plant housekeeping measures. Electro-
mechanical devices  strategically located within the plumbing  system may sense  the pass-
age  of such discharges,  but serve only to inform of the damaging event after its occurrence.

   Accidental  discharges of a  catastrophic  nature are  far more  insidious  because they
are not predictable. Fortunately, they are very rare in this industry.

                                           8

-------
   Although  revision of a  plant  to  prevent  both nuisance and catastrophic  pollution is
more  properly the province of the pollution control systems design engineer,  as it  is an
integral portion of his entire  prospective treatment scheme,  control measures should  be
at least evaluated by the plant operator prior to design discussion. Such evaluations may
forestall delays and interruptions of his work schedule which  otherwise may be caused by
the installation of the treatment systems.

   Several general  plans  may apply  as  temporary  catastrophic pollution  prevention
techniques, i. e.:

      a. All  rinse  waters  are piped  directly  to the  sewer  (with  plans to  pipe  these
        rinse waters to their respective treatment plant areas once the  waste treatment
        system  is designed  and installed.)  Thus, all  floor  exits  to the sewer may  be
        plugged, preventing  the  escape of accidental spills  of concentrated solutions.
        Spent process solutions in this system  are pumped  to holding tanks for  remov-
        al  by scavenger, or  for  treatment and gradual discharge. Floor sumps will  be
        required for sump  pumps.  Obviously,  where  both  cyanide and  chromium  solu-
        tions  are  in  use,  steps  must be taken  in floor segregation  to  assure that cy-
        anide and alkali spent solutions are prevented from mixing with chromium and
        acid wastes,  thus  avoiding the possibility of generating toxic hydrocyanic acid
        gases. Separate drainage, sumps, and  holding tanks would be provided for this
        condition.

      b. Another method is  to install a large  holding  pit  or lined lagoon  located  out-
        side. All flows exiting from the plant would pass  through this pit or lagoon be-
        fore entering  the  sewer. Electromechanical devices  for  the measurement of pH
         and conductivity would be  installed prior to the holding  area. Any  sudden  and
         large variations  in pH or conductivity sensed by the instruments would sound an
         alarm and turn off  all  incoming  water to the processing plant. The retention
         time in  the pit or  lagoon would be sufficient to cushion and absorb the incoming
         concentrated  solution  or "slug"  without adverse effect at the outfall. Thus, the
         slug would be retained in the holding facility for treatment or disposition.

      c. A  third means of attack  is based  on the supposition  that the plant  in question
         has existing  floor trenches  through  which  all wastes  are conveyed  from the
         plant, and that these trenches are large enough  to be  divided  lengthwise  into
         two subtrenches. By this dividing technique,  the  outer  side of the trench could
         be  used for  rinse waters.  The headers  from the  rinse  water  tanks  could  go
         directly to this portion of the trench which  would  then  be covered  over  to pre-
         vent entry of floor spillage. The other  half of the  trench would remain  open and
         would be  used as in part  "b" above, i.e., ending in a  sump.  Accordingly,  this
         open portion  of the  trench would have no exit to  sewer, and  would  catch  all
         solution dumps and floor spills for pumping to a disposition point elsewhere.
    To increase awareness  of potential pollutive  sources  within  the plant,  the  following
 suggestions for an investigative effort are made:

       a. Begin by  tracking  all  plant incoming  water from its  sources  to its  ultimate
         destination.

-------
      b. Don't   overlook   fume   scrubbers,   water-cooled  rectifiers,  heat   exchangers,
        boilers, heating and cooling coils, air conditioners, and welders.

      c. Ascertain that all inlet water lines  to process solutions have anti-syphon devices.

      d. Inspect all  heating  and  cooling coils for physical condition  (conductivity meters
        for leak detection will be required  when a waste treatment  system  is installed.)

      e. Thoroughly inspect  all  floors and  foundations  in the processing  areas  for pos-
        sible leakage and consequent percolation to ground waters.

      f. Check  all  chemical  storage areas for  compliance  with safety regulations and
        methods for handling "empty" and broken containers.

      g. Make  an inspection  inside and out of all process tanks and filters for  physical
        condition.   Check especially  those tanks where processes  are  seldom  if ever
        removed. All piping should also be examined.

      h. Record all data acquired with the foregoing  steps. It will prove very useful later.
WATER CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES

   Rinsing represents the most  frequently used  process in  metal finishing. It  is  by far
the largest consumer of water, and has been given little or  no consideration as a cost or
problem  area. Abundance, ready  availability, and low cost have historically contributed to
this inattention to plant water usage and to  good rinsing practices. Hardening this attitude
has  been the  absence  of any  strictly enforced restrictions on  the discharge of  waste
rinse waters. Rinsing difficulties could always be overcome  with more water .  .  .  where
the water went afterward was a matter of no import. But today the environment commands
attention. Water  usage  and effluent  water  quality, thus,  have  become major  factors in
profit and loss statements and are the principal determinants of the magnitudes of capital
expenditures for water pollution control systems.

   Modern effluent regulations have eliminated any remaining possibility of continuing to
discharge untreated water. Open to question only is the nature  and degree of treatment
which will be required.  Of great  economic consequence,  therefore, is  any reduction in
water usage which may be achieved through plant re-organization of rinsing practices. In
plants where there has been little attention  to rinse flow rates, water conservation studies
have repeatedly shown that  each rinse tank flow may usually be reduced by 50% or more
without impairment of rinsability.  (In one large plant, a flow of  10,000 GPH was reduced
to 700 GPH before rejected work attributable to poor rinsing was detected.)

   The  objective  of rinsing is  to  flush away  and  remove dissolved salts  and  solids
clinging to work pieces so that:

      a. Coatings subsequently applied will bond properly to the work.

      b. No  unwelcome discoloration or chemical change will occur to the work  surface
         due to residual films.

      c. Contamination of succeeding process solutions may be prevented.

                                           10

-------
   The  objective  in  water  conservation is to  get  the  maximum  amount  of rinsing with
the least amount of water. Rinsing occurs at the work surface and is influenced by:

      a. Exposure time of the work pieces to the water.

      b. The amount of "fresh" water which  may  be brought  to  work surface during
        the exposure time.

      c. The temperature of the entering  work pieces and  the temperature  of the  rinse
        water.

      d. The shape of the work and its position on the rack or in the fixture.

   Rinse water removes chemical  films  from  work  pieces by the  process  of diffusion.
The  rate at  which  the film is removed  is dependent upon the  water solubility of the
chemicals in  that film. The chemicals are thus  absorbed into the  body of the  rinse water.
From a practical standpoint, there are a number of methods  available (though, inexpli-
cably, seldom used)  to improve  diffusion  and  hasten the  completion  of the rinsing proc-
ess. Many of these methods  also produce a dramatic reduction in water usage.

   The  most difficult part of water conservation  is  the  first  step,  the determination  of
minimum water usage for each rinse phase of the metal finishing cycle. "Minimum water
requirements" cannot be based on the supposition that the work pieces must be completely
free  of  any chemical films, for  the  amount of water to produce such work piece surfaces
is  so great  as to  be  economically intenable and probably unavailable. In actual practice,
a  chemical film will  almost always  remain on the  work after rinsing. The amount of film
which may be safely  allowed to remain on the work is based upon  two considerations:

      a. Chemical films  remaining after  rinsing must not poison the  succeeding process
        to which the work  pieces will be exposed.

      b. These post-rinsing  chemical  films  must not produce  adverse effects  on the
        work piece surfaces themselves  or  cause  underlying problems for  subsequent
        coatings to  be applied on the work.

   In short,  one  must reduce rinse water flow until the residual chemical film, because
of its concentration and/or thickness, begins to cause subsequent production problems.

   Implicit to these considerations is the fact that each process and  each  plant is dif-
ferent;  its  production, work geometry,  incoming water quality,  processing equipment con-
figuration,  even  the protective  coatings  on incoming basis materials  and storage prac-
tices, all will influence water requirements. Therefore,  each  plant  operator will be obliged
to determine his own  minimum water requirements  step by step and rinse  by rinse.  A
stepwise logical approach might be:

      1. Investigate plant  chemical consumption records. Peak periods of chemical addi-
         tions to process tanks and a  rundown on  parts which  were metal  finished dur-
         ing these peak  periods will help to locate the work producing the most dragout.

      2. When this  work  is being run,  select a  rinse  tank following a process whose
         solution is  known to  be difficult to rinse (chromium  or  cyanide baths  are  good

                                         11

-------
  examples.) The rinse tank must have  been cleaned  and filled with fresh water
  and  then  turned off. The level should be high enough to allow immersion of the
  rack or barrel to  the usual depth but  should  be low enough to prevent water
  displaced  by the immersion  to  overflow. Vigorous agitation of the work and/or
  the rinse  water is  suggested. With the  volume of water known  by simple tank
  measurement, and  an analysis  of the process  bath  preceding the rinse  already
  available, an analysis  of one process bath constituent  in  the  rinse  water pre-
  dicts all  the  other constituents by ratio, and  establishes a highest-dragout vol-
  ume figure. This figure may be  assumed  to be  the  dragout  volume  from each
  of the rest  of the  metal  finishing processes in the cycle where  the same  racks
  or barrels are used. Although it  is recognized  that 100% removal  of  the chemi-
  cal film may not always be removed in this single  stagnant  rinse, the operator
  may exercise  his own judgment on the  efficiency of a second stagnant rinse  for
  dragout determination.  A hose might be used (as a second  rinsing) as the work
  is being  withdrawn,  the water used  to  be collected,  measured  for volume, and
  analyzed as before.

3. When  the volume  of dragout has  thus been established, its  concentrations in  the
  case  of  every process bath should   be arithmetically adjusted  to the  highest
  levels  at  which any  of these baths  might be operated. A similar  dragout  deter-
  mination  should be  considered wherever  a different line  is involved  and  the
  work  processing motions and  fixtures  are likewise different.  (Dragout figures
  thus achieved are of paramount importance in  the  successful design of  waste
  treatment systems.)

4. With the  dragout concentrations and  volumes now known, reduction of water us-
  age  in rinse tanks may commence.   Existing  rinse  water  flows must be  meas-
  ured.  In  the  absence of flow meters,  two techniques may  be used successfully.
  The first  involves physical  measurement of  the working  volume of the rinse
  tank,  a  lowering  of the rinse  water level to  a measured depth  (at  the end of
  the  working day after  the water  has been turned off) and a measure  (at the be-
  ginning of  the next day when the water is turned on again) of how long it takes
  to fill the  tank  again to operating  level. This  method is effective when rinse
  tank  outlet headers are permanently  piped into the  exit trench  or sewer. A
  variation of this method is  to insert  a  five gallon bucket into the flowing rinse.
  By  withdrawing five  gallons of  rinse  water  rapidly, one  may  time  the period
  required  for five  more gallons of rinse water  in the rinse tank to reach over-
  flow levels  again. This test must  be  repeated several times  and  the results
  averaged because  it is difficult  to  visually ascertain  the  exact  time at which
  the flow over the overflow dam has reached a stabilized flow condition.

  The second method involves a five  gallon bucket and a stopwatch for measure-
   ments at the overflow  outlet. An alternative method  is to buy a flow meter and
   use  it in each of the  incoming  rinse  water lines, one by  one,  until the  neces-
   sary information is obtained.

   All  flow  rate measurements should  be carefully recorded  as well as readings
   at the water main. Now  the actual  reduction  of rinse flows  may begin. This is
   the  most difficult  phase of the entire  conservation  and abatement operation. It
   is laborious,  because  each rinse  must  be carefully  observed  during the gradual

                                    12

-------
day-to-day  reduction in  flow  rate  so that the effect  on the work and/or  the
succeeding  process  may  be duly noted as  the moment arrives when poor rins-
ing begins to cause rejections. The  strictest discipline must  be maintained in
the plant by  the  operating  personnel  so that the cause for rejection may be
traced to its  true source.  Valve settings on  rinse water  lines must be  under
the specific control  of the person  charged with  water  conservation,  and tam-
pering should  not  be tolerated. As  the maximum reduction  in  flow  rate for each
rinse  is revealed and  the  readings recorded,  rinse water flows may be  advanc-
ed  slightly to prevent  further rejection. At  this juncture,  if  no further  con-
servation measures  are  to be considered,  flow  restrictor valves  should  be  in-
stalled  in  all  rinse  tank  incoming  water lines. Several  types   are available
which not  only restrict  water flow  to a fixed maximum  output,  but also  will
automatically  adjust to  changes in  water main  pressure, even   act simultan-
eously as  syphon  breakers, and are tamperproof. Flow meters may  be used,
in conjunction with normal  valving,  to  control  flow,  having the  advantage of
advancing  flow rates when  desired, but  are  not tamperproof and  are  much
more  expensive. (It should  be duly  noted  that up to the point of installing valves
or meters,  no money  has  been spent except in  the necessary labor.  It is  also
likely that the average  plant,  upon  concluding this  first water conservation ef-
fort, will achieve a reduction of about 50% in  its  water usage. An  average plant
whose total flow rate  is 100 GPM can  thus save approximately 50  GPM, and,
based on 3000 operating hours per year  and a water  charge  of $0.25/1000  gal.,
an annual saving of  over $2000.00  is achieved.  The same reduction  in  water
usage will cut the capital costs of a waste  treatment system in   half ...  for
the average plant, that saving can amount to $40,000.00!)

Further  and equally dramatic reductions in water consumption are achievable
through the use of mechanical devices and equipment rearrangements such as:

a. Counterflow multiple tank rinsing. (Appendix, Figs. 8 and 9)

   In counterflow  rinsing,  used water exiting the  first tank becomes feed water
   for the second, and after being used again, feeds the third tank, and so on.

   The  advantage of counterflow rinsing  is in the  repeated exposure of the work
   pieces to the water, the increase  in dwell  time, permitting more diffusion to
   occur, and  the ability to bring the majority of the water passing through  into
   more intimate contact with  the'work.  The results in water  saving  are gratify-
   ing.  For example,  if a dragout of 1  gal./hour in a given case required a
   1000 to 1 dilution in order to produce acceptable work, 1000 gallons of rinse
   water per hour would be  required  in a single rinse  tank; in a double counter-
   flow rinse  system,  30-35 GPH are required, and in a triple counterflow rinse
   system,  8-12 GPH are needed. The disadvantage is that  the work requires two
   or three processing steps instead  of one,  and  more  equipment  and space is
   also mandatory.  If multiple counterflow rinsing is designed into prospective
   automatic metal  finishing equipment,  the initial disadvantages  are  increased
   capital  expense and space requirements. The ultimate advantage lies not  only
   in the enormous drop  in water costs, but also in  a sharp  reduction  in the
   cost of  the supporting  waste treatment system. Additionally, the  curtailment
   of water volume makes the use of waste recovery systems more inviting.

                                  13

-------
b.  Multiple tank rinsing (Appendix, Fig. 10)

   This  type  of rinsing is  merely a battery  of  single rinses, each with  its own
   feed waters. The principles are generally the same as in  "a" above, although
   the total reduction  in  water consumption will  not be as great as  with the
   counterflow system.

c.  Spray rinsing: (Appendix, Fig. 11)

   Two  categories of  spray rinsing  may  be used.  The first,  impact spraying,
   uses  both  impact and  diffusion  to  remove  contaminant films. It  uses  little
   water compared to  immersion rinsing, and may be used  in  some  cases  as a
   recovery rinse  by  pumping the collected spray volume into the previous  proc-
   ess tank, but is disadvantaged when the work  pieces have areas inaccessible
   to the spray nozzles.

   The second method, rinse and spray, employs immersion rinsing followed  by
   a spray operational only when the work is withdrawn from  the rinse tank. It
   is  advantageous in removing  stubborn films by  impact and permits lower
   water flows in the main body of the rinse tank.

d. Fog rinsing (Appendix, Fig. 12)

   Fog rinsing finds utility at exit stations of process tanks. A  fine fog is spray-
   ed on the  work, thus diluting the dragout film and causing a  runback into  the
   process  solution. Fog rinsing finds application in those  instances where proc-
   ess operating temperatures,  high enough  to  produce  a high evaporation rate,
   allow replacement water to be  added to the  process in this manner.  Fog rins-
   ing also prevents dry-on patterns  by cooling  the  work pieces. To be effective,
   fog rinsing requires a slow rate  of withdrawal  of the work from  the  process
   tank.

e. Chemical rinsing (Appendix, Figs. 13 and 14)

   The  principle  of Chemical rinsing has been used by the metal finishing  in-
   dustry for many  years. One  of the oldest  applications  of this principle was
   used quite effectively to eliminate staining from the chromium solution, notor-
   iously difficult to  rinse.  By the  simple  expedient of making the  first  rinse
   after  chromium plate a  stagnant rinse containing sodium  bisulfite,  the  drag in
   of hexavalent  chromium was converted to trivalent chromium. Thus, the rins-
   aoility of the work in the second rinse was improved considerably by:

   a. Changing the chemical nature of the film on the work  in the stagnant
     rinse, and

   b. Reducing  film concentrations before  attempting to rinse by diffusion. The
     same principle is  frequently employed in "neutralizing" dips.

   The application of  chemical rinsing to  plant  effluent treatment has been well
   described  by  LANCY2,3,4 and PINNER5 and is  known  as "Integrated Waste
   Treatment"  in the  industry.  Aside from   the  environmental benefits  thus

                                 14

-------
           achieved, this type of chemical rinsing also prevents the majority of heavy
           metal solids formed in the chemical rinse from reaching the succeeding water
           rinses  by removing these materials in  an external settling vessel.  This is
           accomplished by flowing the chemical  rinse solution  to a treatment reservoir.
           The  overflow from the reservoir is pumped back  to  the  rinse tanks  forming
           a complete closed-loop system. Chemicals are added  to the reservoir  to  pro-
           vide  a controlled  excess of reagent in the  solution.  The reservoir acts as  a
           combined reaction and settling  tank. Because of the  presence  of a controlled
           excess of reagents in the  chemical rinse  tank,  toxic materials  and heavy
           metals are removed  from the  metal  finishing sequence  and  are prevented
           from  entering the subsequent  water rinse.  At the same time rinsing is im-
           proved due to the fact that  the diffusion layer, which  is present during  con-
           ventional water rinsing, is broken down by the chemical reaction.

   Such  equipment  rearrangements  and additions, as  water conservation  measures, are
capable of reductions  in water  use of up to 90%!  Additionally,  the saving related to
prospective capital outlays cannot be calculated solely in terms of reduction  in equipment
size; it can make the difference between  satisfying  effluent  control demands or closing
the metal finishing plant, if considered only from the standpoint of available plant space.
The basis for future effluent  control systems design, likewise, may be radically  changed
by the skillful application of conservation techniques.

   Other devices which assist in the improvement of rinsing are:

      a.  Agitation of the work in the rinse tank.

      b.  Air agitation of the rinse water.

      c.  Hydraulic agitation of the rinse water.

      d.  Agitation through mixers or impellers.

      e.  Ultrasonic agitation.

      f.  Elevation of rinse water temperature.

      g. Use of rinse aids and wetting agents.

      h. Recirculation and reuse of rinse water using ion exchange.

    No consideration has  been given here to the  possibilities  of reusing  treated water
from a prospective  effluent treatment facility to achieve yet  a further reduction  in water
purchases. An accurate  assessment of  the volume and quality  of reuse water from this
source cannot be made until  the  design concept for a treatment system has been decided.
The treatment methods  chosen will determine the quality of the treated water  and the
selection  of rinse tanks  where it may be safely  used. Nonetheless, the prospect of re-
covered  water  must  be  considered  as  a  factor  during water  conservation   planning
endeavors.

    When  the foregoing  water conservation practices  have been concluded, the  compiled
data will supply the necessary ingredients to predict rinse water volumes required  when

                                           15

-------
the new work pieces and racking produce a change in  dragout conditions. Only the  new
dragout volume and concentration need be determined by actual analysis (as defined earlier
in this presentation).  Formulae6,7,8  may  then  be  applied  to  calculate  the  flow  rate
required, and the proper restrictor valve settings may then be applied.


UPDATING METAL FINISHING AND POLLUTION CONTROL AT COMPANY X

   At a meeting of the  Board of Directors  of Company X on October  18, 1971, the major
topic of discussion was pollution control and what to do about it Everyone agreed  that
something should be done, but since very  little  pressure had been received by  Company
X from the people down at the sewage works to  clean up the Company's discharges, (and
besides, there  were  no clear rules or recommendations to date  which pointed the way  to
doing  a  once - and • for •  all  job on  pollution  control), there was  an  understandable
reluctance to spend money when the goal was not clear and it didn't make a profit.

   The conclusion of the Board on that day  was that it would be necessary to  appoint a
responsible member of middle management to the task of finding out what the scope  of
their problem was, and then, how they  could reduce the amount  of pollution and get ready,
once the  oncoming regulations applying to them  became known, to put in pollution control
systems.  If, at the same time,  a way could  be found to reduce the waste of the Company's
chemicals and water, so much the better.

   To  accomplish their objectives quickly  and expeditiously, they selected  an aggressive
young  manager. His primary responsibility was  to define the plant's environmental prob-
lem  ... if  time remained to  perform  his  other duties, fine  ... if not, those duties
would  be assigned to someone else. In  addition, he was told that all future environmental
considerations affecting the operations of Company X would be his  responsibility ...  in
effect,  he became the new Pollution  Control Officer reporting directly to the  President
and Chairman of the Board. He was given the  authority to require  the cooperation of all
plant personnel to accomplish his mission.

   The first step was to develop a Site Plan (See Appendix, Fig. 15) to show

       a. Where the waterborne wastes came from and where they were going.

       b. Where the plant boundaries were.

       c.  What usable space was available for future pollution control equipment.

       d. What influence the topography might have on drainage.

    Several more points were revealed  during the site investigation:

       a. There was no manhole at  the point where the plant  industrial sewer  joined the
         interceptor, and  thus, no easy way to sample the  effluent for analysis  or  to
         determine  the flow rate. A design  for a  manhole  was  obtained  from the  City
         Sanitary Department; it included a calibrated V-Notch weir and provisions for
         monitoring equipment.

       b. It was possible  during a rain  to have drainage from  a chemical storage  area
         for "empty" containers run into a ditch leading to a small creek.

                                         16

-------
      c. The water table  at the outside area assigned to future pollution control  equip-
        ment was more than thirty feet down.

   Next came a sketch and study of the Equipment Layout (See Appendix, Fig. 16), which
included:

      a. The location of each waste producing piece of equipment

      b. The processing cycles.

      c. The production from each cycle.

      d. The location of accessory equipment.

   The geography of the equipment  would prove useful when  the time came  to move pol-
lution control equipment into the plant. Updating of this layout print whenever any equip-
ment  changes occurred would  prevent  the appearance of an  obstacle  (where no obstacle
was supposed to  be) thus confounding the installation  engineer.  (The  importance of this
document  to a pollution  control  systems design engineer is  incalculable  ... it  has a
major influence on the selection of both treatment concept and equipment.) Recorded also
at this time was information concerning:

      a. Plant electrical power and capacity.

      b. Steam availability.

      c. Head space and usability.

      d. Support column locations.


   Since four major metal finishing lines were to be  examined, it was  decided  to look
at them one at a  time.  Hence, an individual equipment layout in each case was drawn. The
Nickel-Chromium  Plater (See Appendix, Fig. 17) (including its Rack Strip Line) began the
parade.  The object was to determine and  record what was in  each  process tank in  terms
of major chemical constituents,  when spent processes were dumped, how much rinse  water
was being used, and what volume of dragout was being  developed. To accomplish the first,
a  record of purchases  of  all  chemicals and basis  materials for  1971  was obtained from
the Chief Buyer, and matched with the Metal Finishing Department's record of additions to
the various tanks. Where proprietary materials were  involved, the suppliers  of those ma-
terials were contacted for information  on the principal ingredients.

   Next came the determination of dragout and process dumping schedules  (See Appendix,
Fig. 18). In  this line, the chromium plating solution was chosen for  the measurement, and
used as the criterion for  the other process  dragout volumes in the line. No  substitutions
were contemplated, but plans were made to investigate  the  applicability of phosphate-free
cleaners. All processes were reduced to  their minimum concentrations, and  a fog rinse
was installed at the exit station of the nickel.

    Attention now turned  to the  rinse flows (See  Appendix,  Fig. 19).  Gradual reduction
of these flows over  a period  of five weeks produced an average cutback for the  entire
line of 910 GPH or approximately 55%.

                                          17

-------
   In the Zinc  Plater,  (See Appendix,  Figs. 20, 21, 22) the same procedure was used.
The  Cyanide Zinc  solution was replaced  with a non-cyanide  non-chelated  alkaline zinc
process  and  the  chromates were  made to last 50% longer  by  altering the baths  with
inhibitors and increasing up-dwell time over them. Double-dunking  is now being  consider-
ed in selected rinses.

   Rinse flow reduction amounted to an aggregate of 1400 GPH or about 45%.

   The  Phosphater (See Appendix,  Figs.  23,  24, 25)  did  not have any substitution  of
process. Rinse water flow was reduced  by 750 GPH  or about 40%.  It was discovered that
the cleaners  would  last for ten  days if small frequent additions  of replenishment  cleaner
were made. This  resulted in a 50%  saving by decreasing the frequency  of the discard of
spent process.

   Only a small saving was realized  in  the  Anodizer (See  Appendix,  Figs. 26, 27,  28).
The  Desmutter was replaced by a chromium-free process and a reduction in water usage
of 80 GPH or about  35% was realized.

   After the rinse  water  conservation  program  was  completed,  several  remedial  meas-
ures were taken to prevent the new housekeeping attitude from having a relapse:

      a. All incoming rinse water lines were equipped with restrictor valves.

      b. All  hoses  were  spring  loaded  so that they  could not be  abandoned  in a running
         condition.

      c. All  the  rinse water  mains  leading to each automated  line were equipped with
         solenoid valves connected to the  control panels of each machine. When the ma-
         chines  were not operating during  breaks or  lunch periods,  the  valves auto-
         matically shut off rinse water flow.

      d. An  investigation  is now  being carried out  to  determine  the advisability  of
         conductivity cells for the rinse tanks.

      e. Areas between  adjacent tanks (where  spillage and drippage from work  in trans-
         fer  could  fall  to  the floor) were equipped  with troughs  to catch such  drippage
         and let it drain  back to the process where it had originated.

      f. All  naked anode  rails were  taped to  prevent  erosion  of contaminating metals
         into the processes they served.

      g. Tank covers  furnished with  original  equipment,  and long since  removed  from
         the tanks, were returned to their intended purpose.

      h. Chemical  definitions of all protective  oils  or drawing and stamping compounds
         used either  in  the plant,  or  by vendors  were obtained,  tested  for ease of  re-
         moval,  and catalogued.  Vendors and plant personnel alike were  expressly for-
         bidden to  change the composition of any of these coatings without notifying the
         plant chemist  and the pollution  control group. Similarly,  changes  in metal fin-
         ishing process  compositions could  not be  made without  approval  by  the pollu-
         tion control group.

                                          18

-------
   Company X, in the first  year  of operation since these changes were made, has saved:

      a. By lowering water usage	$4,300.00

      b. By reducing chemical use	$5,800.00

      c. By a 1.7% drop in overall  rejection rate	$7,700.00

                                                       Total	$17,800.00

   What is more important, Company X had only a few more  chores  to perform and it
would be  ready for  pollution control design. A  foundation  plan (See  Appendix, Fig.  29)
was  needed so that a design engineer could make  recommendations  on  the segregation
of accidental  spills  and  also the  most  convenient  disposition  of spent  processes.  The
problem of catastrophe prevention would require a  long look at the  types  of coatings
available for  floor and foundation protection. Though Company  X had never experienced
a catastrophic  spill  in its seventeen years of operation, it  was painfully evident to  the
Board of Directors that the existing foundation plan did not  offer safety, should the seven-
teen-year record be  inadvertently ended.  (And too,  the City  had just received funds to
erect  a  secondary  treatment system complete with  bugs  which  eat  sewage,  but  don't
much like  metal  finishing wastes.) The foundation  plan, however, did lend itself  to  the
temporary piping of all rinse waters  to the  underground pipes leading to  the interceptor.
Thus, the trenches could  house the rinse water pipes and  also be  used  to convey floor
spills and dumps to  blind  sumps  from which they would be pumped into holding tanks for
disposition. This plan is now being implemented by Company X.

   All that now remained was to tabulate each  toxic material (See Appendix, Fig. 30) by
reviewing materials purchased and process composition.  The tabulation  accurately predicts
the quality of the  effluent. With the new  manhole now installed, Company X  is recording
flow rates  exiting from  the plant.  Composite samples are being taken  by means of a
twenty-four hour sampler recently  purchased. Quantitive results will  soon be  available.
Because Company X took  the time to survey its plant and its chemical  usage, the need for
extensive  and expensive effluent sampling has  been greatly  reduced.  Effluent sampling
will  confirm  by analysis  the accuracy  of the earlier dragout determinations. The  record
on the contents of each process and Company X's purchases will tell the analyst what he
must search for in the samples.

   The  Company has now  turned its attentions -to developments in environmental regula-
tions . . .  plans  for Company growth will be influenced  .  . . but Company X now  has
bought  the time  to  weigh these  plans carefully,  the time to examine  the field for  firms
whose capabilities in environmental control design will successfully conclude the work it
has  started.  Company  X is also satisfied that when  the  control system it chooses is
installed,  it will  be able  to accommodate  the work without  any serious interruption in
normal production.

   Company  X  reckons that it  has spent almost $6,000.00 in  manhours, analysis,  and
some equipment. It  has  discovered  many serious lapses in production techniques  during
the investigation.  It has  eliminated  any reasonable possibility  of catastrophic pollution.
Most of all, Company X is  ready for the future.

                                          19

-------
                                  BIBLIOGRAPHY

1J. B. Kushner, Metal Finishing, pgs. 59, 60, 61, 64, November and December 1951.

2L. E. Lancy, Metal Finishing, 1951, pgs. 49(2), 56.

3L. E. Lancy and H. F. Hanson, Plating, 1952, pgs. 39, 210.

4L. E. Lancy, Sewage and Ind. Wastes, 1954, pgs. 26,1117.

5R. Pinner, Electroplating and Metal Finishing, 1967, pg. 20, July, August, September.

6 A. F. Mohrnheim, Plating, 1969, June, pgs. 715-718.

7 J. B. Kushner, Metal Finishing, 1955, January, pgs. 715-718.

8J. A. Tallmadge and B. A. Buffham, Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 1961,
 August, pgs. 817-828.
                      Prepared by:
                           Alan E. Olsen
                           Director, Environmental Services Group
                           Oxy Metal Finishing Corporation
                                         20

-------
APPENDIX

-------
                     FIGURE 1
SOME CHEMICALS USED IN THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY
CHEMICAL
Aluminum Potassium Sulphate
Aluminum Silicate
Ammonium Acetate
Ammonium Bifluoride
Ammonium Chloride
Ammonium Citrate
Ammonium Hydroxide
Ammonium Molybdate
Ammonium Nitrate
Ammonium Sulfate
Anisic Aldehyde
Antimony Potassium Tartrate
Barium Carbonate
Barium Sulphate
Benzene (Benzol)
Boric Acid
Cadmium Cyanide
Cadmium Sulfate
Calcium Nitrate
Chromic Acid
Citric Acid
Cobalt Carbonate
Cobalt Sulfate
Cupric Sulfate
Diammonium Phosphate
Ferric Nitrate
Fluoboric Acid
Formaldehyde
Glue
Glycerine
Hydrazine Sulfate
Hydrochloric Acid CP
Hydrofluosilicic
Hydrogen Peroxide
Hydroxyacetic Acid
Hypophosphorous Acid
PH
ADJUSTMENT
REQUIRED
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CYANIDE
OR
CHROMIUM
TREATMENT
REQUIRED








X


X
















LEGEND
MS — Metal Sludge NH3 — Ammonia
DS — Dissolved Solids O — Organic Mailer
WASTE PRODUCTS
MS DS
MS DS
DS NH3
MS DS NHg
DS NH3
DS NHg O
DS NHg
MS DS NHg
DS NHg
MS DS NHg
MS DS 0
MS
MS
O
DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
DS O
MS
MS DS
MS DS
MS DS NHg
MS DS
MS DS
O
O
0
DS
DS
MS DS

DS O
MS DS

-------
FIGURE 1 (Cont'd.)
CHEMICAL
Indium Sulfate
Iron Oxide
Isopropanol
Lard Oil
Lead Fluoborate
Lead Oxide
Lime (Calcium Hydroxide)
Magnesium Sulfate
Manganese Carbonate
Manganese Sulfate
Methanol
Monoammonium Phosphate
Nickel Carbonte
Nickel Chloride
Nickel Sulfate
Nickel Sulfamate
Nitric Acid
Oxalic Acid
Phosphorous Acid
Potassium Bromate
Potassium Citrate
Potassium Chloride
Potassium Copper Cyanide
Potassium Cyanide
Potassium Ferricyanide
Potassium Hydroxide
Potassium Phosphate
Potassium Stannate
Potassium Thiocyanate
Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate
Soda Ash (Sodium Carbonate)
Sodium Bicarbonate
Sodium Bisulphite
Sodium Bifluoride
Sodium Citrate
Sodium Copper Cyanide
PH
ADJUSTMENT
REQUIRED
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X



X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

CYANIDE
OR
CHROMIUM
TREATMENT
REQUIRED






















X
X
X









X
LEGEND
MS— Metal Sludge NH3— Ammonia
DS — Dissolved Solids O — Organic Matter
WASTE PRODUCTS
MS DS
MS
O
O
MS DS
MS
MS
MS DS
MS
MS DS
0
MS DS NH3
MS
MS DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
DS O
DS
MS DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
DS
DS
DS
MS DS
DS O
MS DS

-------
FIGURE 1 (Cont'd.)
CHEMICAL
Sodium Cyanide
Sodium Dichromate
Sodium Fluoborate
Sodium Gluconate
Sodium Hexametaphosphate
Sodium Hypophosphite
Sodium Hydrosulphite
Sodium Hydroxide (Caustic Soda)
Sodium Metasilicate
Sodium Molybdate
Sodium Nitrate
Sodium Orthosilicate
Sodium Polysulfide
Sodium Stannate
Sodium Sulfate
Sodium Sulfide
Sodium Sulfite
Sodium Tripolyphosphate
Stannous Fluoborate
Stannous Sulphate
Stearic Acid
Sulfamic Acid
Sulphur (Liquid)
Sulphuric Acid
Tallow Glyceride
Tartaric Acid
Tetrapotassium Pyrophosphate
Tetrasodium Pyrophosphate
Toluene (Toluol)
Trichlorethylene
Trichloroethane
Trisodium Phosphate
Xylene (Xylol)
Zinc Chloride
Zinc Cyanide
PH
ADJUSTMENT
REQUIRED


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

CYANIDE
OR
CHROMIUM
TREATMENT
REQUIRED
X
X
































X
LEGEND
MS— Metal Sludge NHs— Ammonia
OS — Dissolved Solids O — Organic Matter
WASTE PRODUCTS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
DS
MS DS
MS DS
MS DS
O
DS
MS
MS DS
O
O
MS DS
MS DS
O
O
0
MS DS
0
MS DS
MS DS

-------

d!
TYPE AUTOMATIC
jty Rack Applications
                                Fig. 2

-------

CONVEYORIZED AUTOMATIC LOADING
AND UNLOADING
                                     Fig. 2A

-------
SIDE ARM RETURN TYPE AUTOMATIC
SYSTEMS
Heavy Duty Applications

-------
PROGRAMMED AUTOMATIC HOIST SYSTEM
Heavy Duty Applications

-------
YPICAI H =AVY DUTY APPIICA1 ION

-------

PROGRAMMED HOIST SYSTEM
Bulk Finishing Applications

-------
PROGRAMMED AUTOMATIC HOIST SYSTEM
Bulk Finishing Applications
                                          Fig. 6

-------
OBLIQUE BARREL AUTOMATIC SYSTEM
Bulk Finishing Applications

-------
                        SINGLE RINSE
OUTGOING WATER
                                                MOVEMENT
                                         INCOMING WATER
                                                    Fig. 8

                      DOUBLE COUNTERFLOW
 OUTGOING WATER
                                        --»--» WORK MOVEMENT
                                            INCOMING WATER
Fig. 8A

-------
      TRIPLE COUNTERFLOW
OUTBOARD TRIPLE COUNTER FL

-------
                                            WORK MOVEMENT
                                                   INCOMING
                                                     WATER

OUTGOING WATER
Fig. 10

-------
               SPRAY RINSING
                                                 INCOMING
                                                  WATER

IMPACT SPRAY
RINSE AND SPRAY
              OUTGOING WATER
                                                     Fig. 11

-------
               ORK MOVEMENT
PROCESS TANK
                          Fig. 12


-------
                    CHEMICAL RINSING
                                                        WORK MOVEMENT
                                                           RINSE WATER
PROCESS TANK
CHEMICAL RINSE
                                      r
                                           ,
                                        OUTGOING WATER
                   PERIODIC BATCH DUMP
                                      Fig. 13

-------

                       INTEGRATED CHEMICAL RINSE
                                                          WORK MOVEMENT
                             CHEMICAL RINSE
PROCESS
TREATMENT CHEMICAL ADD-
                                        OUTGOING WATER

-------
                                    EMPLOYEE
                                     PARKING
                         SHIPPING
                           DOCK
                                     VISITOR PARKING
                          SHIPPING
                        & RECEIVING
•  FUTURJ  :
  PUflff"

                  or EQUIP.
   UTSI
  AVAILABLE FOR
WASTE  TRIATMEN
       L
                               Company X Site Plan

-------
JMPANY X EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
                                                                   ZINC COOLING SYSTEM
                  NICKEL-CHROMIUM PLATER (AUTOMATIC)
                   45 RACKS/HR.-16 HR./DAY
                   6 SO. FT./RACK. MAX.
                   WORK PIECES-STEEL STAMPINGS
 BARREL ZINC PLATER (AUTOMATIC)
  12 BARRELS/HR.-16 HR./DAY
  300 LB./BBL. MAX.
  WORK PIECES-STEEL FASTENERS
  BARRELSIZE-18"x36"
           BARREL PHOSPHATER (AUTOMATIC)
            10 BARRELS/HR.-16 HR./DAY
            500 LB./BBL. MAX.
            WORK PIECES-STEEL THREADED FASTENERS
            BARREL SIZE-18" x 30"
                ANODIZER (MANUAL HOIST)
                 2 LOADS/HR.-8 HR./DAY
                 50 SO.  FT./LOAD MAX.
                 WORK PIECES-ALUMINUM STAMPINGS
•3   0
                                                                                                                           Fig. 16
                                              DEIONIZER

-------
                NICKEL-CHROMIUM  PLATER
                  PROCESS  COMPOSITION
8 OZ/GAL
SODA ASH
        CONC.
     NITRIC ACID
    (PROPRIETARY
     ADDITIVES)
 12 OZ/GAL
CAUSTIC SODA
 SODA ASH
 PHOSPHATES
  SILICATES
SURFACTANTS
SAME AS (6)
       SAME AS (3)
 30% BY VOL.
HYDROCHLORIC
    ACID
          12 OZ/GAL
        CAUSTIC SODA
          SODA ASH
         PHOSPHATES
          SILICATES
        SURFACTANTS

                                            [0X0]
                50 OZ/GAL NICKEL SULFATE
               12 OZ/GAL NICKEL CHLORIDE
                  7 OZ/GAL BORIC ACID
              PROPRIETARY ADDITION AGENTS
                                                       O
                                   50 OZ/GAL CHROMIC ACID
                                   CATALYST (SULFURIC ACID
                                       AND FLUORIDES)
                                        (PROPRIETARY)
                                              12 OZ/GAL
                                             CAUSTIC SODA
                                              SODA ASH
                                             SURFACTANTS
                                              PHOSPHATES
                                              GLUCONATES

                                                   Fig. 17

-------

                                        NICKEL-CHROMIUM  PLATER
                                              AND RACK STRIP
                                DUMPING SCHEDULE — SPENT PROCESSES
 300 GAL.
QUARTERLY
1300 GAL. (EST.)|
   MONTHLY

1100 GAL. (EST.)j
   MONTHLY
NICKEL STORAGE
                                                    190 GAL.
                                                   I MONTHLY I

                                                190 GAL.
                                                TWICE
                                                WEEKLY
                              190 GAL.
                              WEEKLY
 540 GAL.
I MONTHLY!

                                                        [o][oi
                                  NOT DISCARDED!
                                      NOT DISCARDED


PROCESS
1. SOAK CLEAN
2. C.W. RINSE
3. ANODIC CLEAN
4. C.W. RINSE
5. C.W. RINSE & SPRAY
6. ACID
7. C.W. RINSE
8. C.W. RINSE & SPRAY
9. ANODIC CLEAN
10. C.W. RINSE & SPRAY
11. ACID
PROCESS
TANK
CAPACITY
1100 GAL.

540 GAL.


190 GAL.


190 GAL.

190 GAL.


PROCESS
12. C.W. RINSE
13. NICKEL PLATE
14. DRAGOUT
15. C.W. RINSE
16. C.W. RINSE
17. CHROME PLATE
18. DRAGOUT
19. C.W. RINSE
20. C.W. RINSE & SPRAY
21. H.W. RINSE
22. LOAD & UNLOAD
PROCESS
TANK
CAPACITY

3300 GAL.



560 GAL.



190 GAL.


=
•


• PRO
I

3
1 J.
1 4.
u
6.
7.
8.
••

                                                                     RACK STRIP
                                                           1. CHROME STRIP
                                                             DRAIN
                                                             C.W. RINSE
                                                             NICKEL STRIP
                                                             C.W. RINSE
                                                             NEUTRALIZE
                                                             C.W. RINSE
                                                             H.W. RINSE
                                                                     RINSE
                                                                     TANK
                                                                    CAPACITY
                                                                    300 GAL.
                                                                    300 GAL.

                                                                    300 GAL.

                                                                    300 GAL.

-------
                                             NICKEL-CHROMIUM PLATER
                                                  AND RACK STRIP
                                                 RINSE WATER DATA
2 GPH ^B 10 GPH | 10 GPH
  10 GPH H^^
RINSE
TANK
PROCESS CAPACITY
1. SOAK CLEAN
2. C.W. RINSE 190 GAL.
3. ANODIC CLEAN
4. C.W. RINSE COUNTERFLOW 190 GAL.
5. C.W. RINSE 190 GAL.
& SPRAY
6. ACID
7. C.W. RINSE] 190 GAL.
8. C.W. RINSE COUNTERFLOW 190 GAL.
& SPRAY
9. ANODIC CLEAN
10. C.W. RINSE & SPRAY 190 GAL.
••^•••••••^•••B

PROCESS
12. C.W. RINSE
•••••••••••••••••••••••I
RINSE
TANK
CAPACITY
190 GAL.
13. NICKEL PLATE
14. DRAGOUT
15. C.W. RINSE
16. C.W. RINSE

190 GAL.
190 GAL.
17. CHROME PLATE
18. DRAGOUT
19. C.W. RINSE
20. C.W. RINSE
& SPRAY ,
21. H.W. RINSE

COUNTERFLOW 190 GAL.

HAUK Sll

PROCESS
1. CHROME STRIP
2. DRAIN
3. C.W. RINSE
4. NICKEL STRIP
5. C.W. RINSE
6. NEUTRALIZE
7. C.W. RINSE
8. H.W. RINSE
______________________

190 GAL.
HP ^^
RINSE
TANK
CAPACITY


300 GAL.

300 GAL.

300 GAL.
300 GAL.
•••••••••••••••


22. LOAD & UNLOAD
11. ACID

-------
                            ZINC PLATER
                      PROCESS  COMPOSITION
 6 OZ/GAL ZINC METAL
10 OZ/GAL CAUSTIC SODA
  12 OZ/GAL CYANIDE
     CARBONATES
 PROPRIETARY ADDITIVES
          30% BY VOL.
       HYDROCHLORIC ACID
 12 OZ/GAL
CAUSTIC SODA
 SODA ASH
SURFACTANTS
 PHOSPHATES
 GLUCONATES
   10 OZ/GAL SODIUM DICHROMATE
     3 FL. OZ/GAL NITRIC ACID

1  OZ/GAL SODIUM DICHROMATE
  2 FL. OZ/GAL  NITRIC ACID
                                             12 OZ/GAL
                                            CAUSTIC SODA
                                             SODA ASH
                                            PHOSPHATES
                                             SILICATES
                                            SURFACTANTS
                                            Fig. 20

-------
           BARREL ZINC PLATER
DUMPING SCHEDULE — SPENT PROCESSES
       BB a  a__a
                      220 GAL.
                       TWICE
                      WEEKLY
          NOT DISCARDED
265 GAL.
WEEKLY
220 GAL.
 DAILY
220 GAL.
 TWICE
WEEKLY
                                                 300 GAL.
                                                 WEEKLY
PROCESS
1. LOAD & UNLOAD
2. SOAK CLEAN
3. C.W. RINSE
4. ACID PICKLE
5. C.W. RINSE
6. C.W. RINSE
7. P.R. ELECTRO CLEAN
PROCESS
TANK
CAPACITY

300 GAL.

220 GAL.


265 GAL.
220 GAL.
 DAILY
                                        PROCESS
                               TANK
                              CAPACITY
                                        9. ZINC PLATE
                                        10. C.W. RINSE
                                        11. C.W. RINSE
                                        12. CHROMATE I
                                        13. CHROMATE II
                                        14. C.W. RINSE
                                        15. W.W. RINSE
                             1800 GAL.
                              220 GAL.
                              220 GAL.

                              220 GAL.
       8. C.W. RINSE
                                                                     Fig. 21

-------
                        BARREL  ZINC PLATER
                         RINSE WATER  DATA
                    300 GPH
        3270 GPH
                      •mi
                           850 GPH
            300 GPH
120 GPH
                  850 GPH       850 GPH
                 _J
PROCESS
 RINSE
 TANK
CAPACITY
 1. LOAD & UNLOAD
 2. SOAK CLEAN
 3. C.W. RINSE              220 GAL.
 4. ACID PICKLE
 5. C.W. RINSE COUNTERFLOW  220 GAL.
 6. C.W. RINSE              220 GAL.
 7. P.R. ELECTRO CLEAN
 8. C.W. RINSE              220 GAL.
PROCESS
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
ZINC PLATE
C.W. RINSE
C.W. RINSE
CHROMATE
CHROMATE
C.W. RINSE

COUNTERFLOW

1
II

RINSE
TANK
CAPACITY

220
220


220

GAL.
GAL.


GAL.
           15. W.W. RINSE
220 GAL.
                                                                      Fig. 22

-------
                      PHOSPHATER
                PROCESS COMPOSITION
      I
    502/GAL
ZINC PHOSPHATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
   NITRATES
 (PROPRIETARY)
   13% BY VOL.
HYDROCHLORIC ACID
  AND ANTIMONY
  (PROPRIETARY)
SAME AS (2)
              EMULSIFIED
              MINERAL OIL
J
                                10% BY VOL.
                                SULFURIC ACID
                           12 OZ/GAL
                         CAUSTIC SODA
                           SODA ASH
                         SURFACTANTS
                          PHOSPHATES
                          GLUCONATES
                                                              Fig. 23

-------
                 PHOSPHATER
   DUMPING SCHEDULE — SPENT PROCESSES
  NOT
DISCARDED
225 GAL.
WEEKLY
               270 GAL.
                DAILY
                                                    o
310 GAL.
WEEKLY
       270 GAL.
       WEEKLY
                        270 GAL.
                         DAILY
               iLJ
                                                NOT
                                              DISCARDED
PROCESS
1. LOAD SHUTTLE
2. SOAK CLEAN
3. SOAK CLEAN
4. C.W. RINSE
5. HOT SULFURIC PICKLE
6. C.W. RINSE
7. PRE DIP
PROCESS
TANK
CAPACITY

310 GAL.
310 GAL.
270 GAL.

225 GAL.
PROCESS
8. W.W. RINSE
9. PHOSPHATE
10. C.W. RINSE
11. C.W. RINSE
12. H.W. RINSE
13. SEAL & OIL
14. UNLOAD STAND
PROCESS
TANK
CAPACITY
270 GAL.
1080 GAL.

270 GAL.
270 GAL.


-------
                      BARREL  PHOSPHATER
                       RINSE WATER DATA
     1920 GPH
240 GPH
1
120 GPH j
1
F20 GPH
720 G
I
PH
120 GPH
I
                                                                   LJ
PROCESS
  RINSE
  TANK
CAPACITY
 1. LOAD SHUTTLE
 2. SOAK CLEAN
 3. SOAK CLEAN
 4. C.W. RINSE
 5. HOT SULFURIC PICKLE
 6. C.W. RINSE
 7. PRE DIP
225 GAL.

225 GAL.
PROCESS
 RINSE
 TANK
CAPACITY
 8. W.W. RINSE             270 GAL.
 9. PHOSPHATE             225 GAL.
10. C.W. RINSEl-COUNTERFLOW 225 GAL.
11. C.W. RINSEj             225 GAL.
12. H.W. RINSE             270 GAL.
13. SEAL & OIL
14. UNLOAD STAND
                                                                   Fig. 25

-------
                 ANODIZER
         PROCESS COMPOSITION

         3 OZ/GAL
         ORGANICS
   VARIABLE
   DILUTE
CONCENTRATION
NICKEL ACETATE
15% BY WEIGHT
SULFURIC ACID
 SURFACTANT
 16% OZ/GAL
CAUSTIC SODA
   AND
 PROPRIETARY
  ADDITIVES
                          5% BY VOL.
                         CHROMIC ACID
                          NITRIC ACID
                               Fig. 26
                         12 OZ/GAL
                        CAUSTIC SODA
                         SODA ASH
                        SURFACTANTS
                        PHOSPHATES
                        GLUCONATES

-------
                           ANODIZER
        DUMPING SCHEDULE — SPENT PROCESSES

                 320 GAL.
                 VARIABLE
                   (AVG.
                QUARTERLY)
            320 GAL.
            WEEKLY
                320 GAL.
                 TWICE
                MONTHLY
          320 GAL.
          WEEKLY
    47S GAL.
   QUARTERLY
         320 GAL.
          WEEKLY
                         PROCESS
                          TANK
                         CAPACITY
1. SOAK CLEAN
2. RINSE
3. CAUSTIC ETCH
4. RINSE
5. RINSE
6. DESMUT
7. RINSE
320 GAL.

320 GAL
320 GAL
            PROCESS
                         PROCESS
                           TANK
                         CAPACITY
 8. ANODIZE
 9. RINSE
10. D.I. RINSE
11. DYE
12. RINSE
13. HOT WATER SEAL
14. WARM D.I. RINSE
475 GAL.


320 GAL.

320 GAL.

-------
                      ANODIZER
                  RINSE WATER DATA
245 GPH
            45 GPH
45 GPH  45 GPH
              L       I       I
45 GPH
                       RINSE FLOWS
PROCESS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
RINSE
TANK
CAPACITY
SOAK CLEAN
RINSE

320
GAL.
CAUSTIC ETCH
RINSE
RINSE
COUNTERFLOW

DESMUT
RINSE
320
320
320
GAL.
GAL.
GAL.
1
PROCESS
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
ANODIZE
RINSE
D.I. RINSE
DYE
RINSE
HOT WATER SEAL
WARM D.I. RINSE
RINSE
TANK
CAPACITY

320
320

320
320

GAL.
GAL.

GAL.
GAL.
                                                        Fig. 28

-------
                                  FOUNDATION  LAYOUT
OUTSIDE
BUILDING
 WALL
                       NDERGROUND PIPE
                                                    NICKEL-CHROMIUM PLATER
                                                                             OPEN TRENCH
                                                                                Fig-29


-------
                                   FIGURE 30
        ITEMS TO BE EXPECTED IN PLANT EFFLUENT OF COMPANY X
Metals
  Nickel
  Chromium
  Copper
  Iron
  Antimony
  Aluminum
  Lead
  Zinc

Organics
  Soluble Oils
  Immiscible Oils
  Gluconates
  Dyes
  Proprietary Additives

Dissolved Solids
  Calcium
  Sodium
  Potassium
  Borates
  Carbonates
  Nitrates
  Chlorides
  Sulfates
  Fluorides
  Silicates
  Phosphates

-------
  METAL FINISHING OPERATIONS




        VENTILATION


           AND


    AIR POLLUTION CONTROL





CONSIDERATIONS, DESIGN, EQUIPMENT
                    \

           AND


     SYSTEM INTEGRATION





         PREPARED


           FOR





ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY


  TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM


       DESIGN SEMINAR








  Ceflcoie
  THE CEILCOTE COMPANY • 140 SHELDON RD. BEREA. OHIO 44017

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I:          INTRODUCTION                     PAGE 1
PART II:         VENTILATION                      PAGE 3
PART III;        AIR POLLUTION CONTROL            PAGE 20
                       DEVICES
PART IV:         CONCLUSION                       PAGE 33
                 APPENDIX, INCLUDING FLOOR PROTECTION

-------
I.  Introduction






          In the discussion of any ventilation system for a




metal finishing operation, two distinct areas should be covered.



These areas are:



          1.  The ventilation of the fumes from the work



              area, and




          2.  The removal of any contaminants from the



              exhaust stream that can cause an air pollution



              hazard.






          In addition to a general discussion of these points,




this paper will also deal.with some of the operating and design




principles upon which ventilation and air pollution control




equipment is based.  It is mandatory that the owner and



operator of the metal finishing equipment have a general idea




of the principles involved so that he can make the best




selection of design and equipment for his own application.




In the final analysis, the owner is the one responsible for



the proper operation and function of the equipment.






          Even if he has recourse back to the supplier, the



owner should never assume that a vendor's "guarantee" absolves

-------
Introduction                                             Page 2






him of all responsibility.  The owner should also carefully




consider all vendors on the basis that if legal recourse is



required, the vendor is economically strong enough to back




up his "guarantee".






          The owner should also be able to understand the



operating and design principles behind the vendor's equipment



well enough so that he has a high degree of technical con-




fidence in the vendor's guarantee.  It is ludicrous not to




be able to judge the technical merits of the design and operation



of any vendor's equipment when the owner is the one responsible




to the pollution control authorities for the proper operation



of his plant and equipment.  For this reason alone, the owner




should be competent enough to be able to analyze and compare



the vendor's equipment and quotation beyond the simple "first



cost price comparison".  When the control authorities want




to padlock your door for creating an air pollution hazard,



they will not be impressed by how much money you saved by




purchasing the least expensive equipment.






          To prevent  action by any air pollution authority,




you must be confident that the equipment you select will




perform satisfactorily for many years, will satisfy the




existing air pollution requirements, and will meet all other





codes and regulatory requirements, including OSHA.

-------
                                                         Page 3






II.  Ventilation






A.  OSHA Considerations






          The Occupational Safety and Health Act  (OSHA), as




published in the Federal Register, Volume 36, No. 105, May 29,




1971, has specific guidelines for the design and evaluation




of exhaust systems.






          The primary requisite for any ventilation system




as required by OSHA is to assure that any air borne toxic




material be held below the threshold limit value  (TLV) or the




maximum allowable concentration (MAC).  Both the TLV and MAC




mean essentially the same thing in that it has been experi-




enced that this concentration of toxic materials will not




materially affect the health of any worker exposed to same for




a period of 8 hours per working date for his entire working




life.  The values of the TLV are as determined by various




governmental agencies, and the OSHA act does include a listing




of these as published by the American Conference of Governmental




Industrial Hygienists.






          In addition to the requirement that all ventilation




systems "be adequate to reduce the concentration of the air




contaminant to the degree that a hazard to the worker does

-------
Ventilation                                            Page 4
not exist", OSHA also lists a specific method for determining
exhaust rates from each tank.  This determination is as pub-
lished by the Committee on Industrial Ventilation's "Industrial
Ventilation Handbook, 12th edition" as published by the American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.  It should be
noted here that in most cases the ventilation rates recommended
in this 12th edition are higher than those listed for identical
applications in previous editions.  OSHA in effect states that
in many cases additional exhaust volumes are needed to control
the contaminant less than the TLV in the area immediately sur-
rounding the tanks being exhausted.

       In the past, lower rates have accomplished this in most
applications.  However, care must be exercised in the initial
design to provide an area where cross drafts are a minimum.  To
do this, the location of windows and doors becomes extremely
critical and should be carefully watched in the vicinity where
exhaust of the metal finishing tanks is required.  Other consid-
erations, such as traffic patterns, work flow, method'of work
movement, and location of personnel must all be studied.

-------
Ventilation                                              Page 5






          When planning a new system or revising an existing



system, special emphasis should be placed on how workers are



exposed to possible contaminants.  Obviously; the farther



away you can keep your workers, the greater the internal



dilution, the lower exhaust rate required to keep contaminants



below the TLV level.  Fresh air movement into the area should



be controlled such that it flows past the worker at his work



station(s).






          These then are the considerations that should be




taken into account in order to comply with OSHA.






B.  Other Factors






          In addition to the above considerations, there should




be other factors which will help in the overall design of the



exhaust system designed and installed.






          One of the most critical items in any ventilation system



is the proper amount of makeup air that is provided.  The



amount of makeup air should be slightly less than the total



volume being exhausted, but the amount of this difference




should be less than 2-5%.  Many ventilation manuals state



that the amount of makeup air should be greater than the amount



of exhaust air.  However, when dealing with toxic contaminants

-------
Ventilation                                              Page 6






and air pollution control requirements, it is mandatory to



keep control of the toxic fumes in the area where they•can be




effectively removed.






          Having a positive pressure within this area means




that wherever windows are open or doors are open, air flow



will be out of the immediate area, and consequently toxic




contaminants can find their way into other areas of the




building.  In any building, it is suggested that the metal



finishing operation where tanks are involved be segregated




somewhat from the remainder of the area.  In this fashion,



makeup air can be supplied to the remaining portion of the



building at an excess quantity with sufficient air makeup .



to cover the slight negative values that would be found in



the metal finishing tank area.  This then will insure that all



air borne contaminants would be carried through the ventilation




system in the metal finishing area which has been specifically



designed and constructed to handle these contaminants.






C.  Materials of Construction






          Obviously, the ventilation system in the metal



finishing area should be constructed of corrosion resistant




materials that are also fire-retardant.  Some of the con-



siderations that should be given to materials of construction




would be the following:

-------
Ventilation                                              Page 7






          1.  Corrosion resistant to contaminants being



              handled




          2:  Physical strength of the materials




          3.  Fire-retardancy



          4.  First cost and installation cost



          5.  Ease of modification






          Over the past 15 years, it has been proven that



solid plastic materials of construction used in ventilation



systems offer many of these advantages at low first cost,




and they are readily installed by most personnel.  Solid




plastic materials available include PVC, polyethylene, poly-




propylene, and glass reinforced polyester, as well as other




glass reinforced thermosetting materials.






          The first three materials listed are thermoplastics




which are by their very nature susceptible to heat degradation



at high temperatures but are effective when it is expected



that operating temperatures within the system are kept well



below the upper operating limits generally recommended.  These




operating limits are as follows:






          PVC - 140° F



          Polyethylene -200° F




          Polypropylene - 230° F

-------
Ventilation                                              Page 8






          Thermosetting resins, such as glass reinforced



polyesters, do not exhibit the same physical strength loss



with increase in temperature and do expand at a slightly lower




rate than most of the thermoplastics.  Glass reinforced



polyesters used in ventilation systems have operated successfully




at temperatures in excess of 250° F.  They can be made fire-




retardant and will contain fire and smoke, should a fire occur.






          Although PVC is generally regarded as non-combustible,




it does give off copius quantities of HC1 when burned, and will



drop flaming globules when exposed to a fire.  In several




cases, PVC fires have snuffed themselves out in a relatively



short period of time, but extensive structural steel damage



has been caused by the large amount of HCl generated.  In



other cases, it has been shown that PVC has spread the fire




by dripping these flaming globules of molten PVC plastic.




Polyethylene is combustible and is generally not recommended




where fire-retardancy is a prime requisite—which should always




be the case in a metal finishing operation.  Polypropylene



is available in fire-retardant grades, but this material will




burn at a faster rate than a comparable glass reinforced




polyester.

-------
Ventilation                                              Page 9






          The key to the effective design of any ventilation




system is to follow some specific guidelines.  The "Industrial




Ventilation Manual", mentioned earlier, offers excellent advice




about the basic components of the ventilation system.






          In addition to this information, it is generally




recommended that duct velocities in the range of 2,500 to




3,500 feet per minute be used for ventilation systems for metal




finishing operations.  This generally keeps the static pressure




in the total duct system to a reasonable amount, generally




in the range of 1.5" to 3" w.g.






D.  Hoods






          Exhaust hoods should be designed to insure capture




of all of the fumes generated from the tanks.  It is important




to remember that the maximum fuming occurs when the work is




placed into the tank and as the work is removed from the tank.




Therefore, it is mandatory that the pickup points be arranged




to capture the fumes in these areas.  If the tank is hot, the




fumes tend to rise and, therefore, pickup points should be




installed above the point where the maximum height of work




occurs during this- transferring operation.






          In addition to consideration for the pickup points,





additional consideration should be given to providing some

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 10






type of baffles around the immediate hood itself.  The addition



of 12" or more of baffles beyond all extremities of the hood



can materially increase the effectiveness of the removal of



the contaminants from the tank area.  It is surprising how



much more effective a hood can be when it is baffled and when



the pickup points are located properly.






          In general, for most metal finishing operations,



slot hoods are used as these tend to give equal distribution




to the suction of the fumes across the width of the tank.




Slot velocities in these slot hoods are generally kept in



the range of 2,000 to 3,000 feet per minute due to the high



static pressure created with this type of an arrangement.



A slot hood with this velocity will generally have no more



than 1/2" to 3/4" static pressure for the hood itself.






          The design of the hood in the duct system should




be based on the following premises:






          1.  Containment of the fumes.  The fumes should be




          kept in the tank area until they can be"thoroughly




          picked up by the exhaust hood.  Additional baffles



          or artificial walls will assist in this operation.




          Baffles tend to eliminate the cross drafts and also

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 11






          help to contain the fumes in the tank area.  It is



          sometimes evident that baffles are also required



          directly above the maximum height of work to control




          the fumes from rising too rapidly before they are




          picked up into the exhaust hood.






          2.  Controlled air flow into the fuming area.  The




          placement of the tanks within the room and location



          of items which can contribute to cross drafts should



          be carefully studied.  The objective is to maintain




          the flow of air into the tank area in such a fashion




          that it constantly flows past the work stations



          and towards the exhaust hoods.  A study on paper



          of the location of windows and doors, as well as



          location of the tanks themselves in relationship




          to .these openings, is important.  Consideration



          for baffles and rearrangement of tanks within a



          given area can sometimes eliminate problems and




          reduce the total amount of ventilation required to




          keep the contaminants below the TLV in the work




          area.  Baffles extended on either side .of the tanks,



          as well as between all hpods, as mentioned above,




          help the orderly flow of air into this area and




          generally assist the exhaust system in performing

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 12






          its vital function, i.e. removal of the con-




          taminants .






          3.  Removal of the fumes from the tank area.  Although




          this seems redundant, it is important that this third



          item be included with the first two because the



          amount of exhaust air utilized for a given tank or



          tanks must be adequate enough to remove the fumes




          in the area in which they are being contained as



          quickly as possible.  Obviously, an inadequate amount




          of exhaust air allows the fumes to linger in the




          exhaust area for too long a period of time permitting



          their eventual escape into the room itself and pos-



          sible contamination of the entire working area.



          In general, the exhaust volume should be 100 to




          200 CFM for heated tanks and not less than 50 to




          75 CPM for cool tanks.  However, the Industrial



          Ventilation Manual or OSHA should be studied before



          any exhaust volumes are defined in a given situation.




          These values can only be used if the fumes are con-  ~




          tained and the air flow into the area is controlled




          as indicated above.

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 13






E.  Ductwork






          In addition to the design and location of the hoods



and other items, some consideration should be given to the




runs of ductwork themselves.  The duct runs should be sloped



and drainage points provided so that condensation on the interior



of the duct walls can be controlled.  The duct material of



construction should be such that if a leak occurs due to physical



damage, repairs can be easily effected to eliminate this potential



sour6e of pollution into a sewer system not equipped to handle




toxic contaminants.  In general, the design of the duct system




should follow the guidelines outlined in the "Industrial Ventila-




tion Manual" with some consideration given to standard practices



within the plastics industry.  For instance, in most instances




plastics fabricators utilize an elbow turning radius of 1-1/2



times the diameter of the duct rather than the 2 times the



diameter recommended in the Industrial Ventilation Manual.



This is merely a compromise between static pressure loss and




initial cost of materials.






F.  Fans






          The exhaust fan is the heart of any exhaust system.



Without the fan providing the necessary suction and the necessary




air movement through the hoods, duct system, scrubber, and




stack, there can be no exhaust system.

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 14






          The exhaust fan should be sized to handle the full




exhaust volume at the static pressure for which the system is



designed.  Since metal finishing installations traditionally




are modified over the years, it is suggested that the fan




selected be of such a size that additional capacity can be




added at a future date by changing the motor and drive arrange-



ment.






          The fan manufacturer should be consulted to make



certain that the fan selected is at the "midpoint" of the




performance range for the particular fan size.  Make certain



that the fan is constructed so that this additional capacity



can actually be realized at a future date.  Beware of furnishing



a Class I fan when an increase in CFM or slight change in the



static pressure would require Class II construction.  This



also applies to the differential between Class II and Class




III, especially where metal fans are involved.  In some cases,




solid plastic fans also have similar restrictions and care



must be exercised in making these selections.






          In any metal finishing ventilation system, it is




advisable to make certain that the fan is completely corrosion




resistant on the inside as well as the outside of the fan



itself.  Corrosion of the exterior housing surfaces of a fan

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 15






leading to premature failure of .same when the interior has




an expensive corrosion resistant system is humorous but some-



times all too true and unnecessarily expensive.






          The most critical part of the fan is the impeller



itself.  It is important to make certain that the impeller



is of adequate design and structurally strong to handle any



increase in capacity at any future date.






          The impeller should be constructed of materials which




are completely corrosion resistant to the expected fumes that




the fan will handle.  If the fan is supplied with a coated




impeller, it should be specified that the coating installer




must spark test this fan after it has been -balanced.  If the




coating so applied is a thermoplastic coating, this coating



should be supplied in adequate thickness for the corrosion



protection involved.  Particular attention should be made to




the tip speed of the impeller.  Make certain that the centri-



fugal forces do not exceed the bond strength of the coating




material causing the coating to fling off and fail prematurely.






          If the fan impeller is constructed of a thermosetting




FRP, then it is important that it is in fact solid plastic




construction and that it is built of the same resin as the




remainder of the duct system.  Again, particular care should

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 16






be made to make certain that the resin selected has adequate




corrosion resistance to all the contaminants the fan is expected



to handle.






          Construction of the fan should include an inspection



door and housing drain.  The housing drain helps to insure




adequate drainage of the condensation which is caused by the




natural centrifugal force of the fan impeller rotating within




the housing.  Since in many cases the exhaust stream coming



from the metal finishing operation is heavily saturated with



liquid droplets, you can expect liquids to build up within



the fan housing very rapidly.  Therefore, a drain should always



be used on any fan involved on a metal finishing application.



This drain should be connected to a seal leg so that it can



properly drain away the liquid without having to overcome




the negative static pressure that may be encountered on the




inlet side of the fan.  An access door on the side of the




fan housing should be provided so that inspection of the fan




impeller can be accomplished with minimum difficulty.  This




also permits cleaning of the fan impeller by washing or similar




type of action.  Cleaning of the fan impeller will help to



extend the service life of the fan itself.






          After the fan impeller, the fan housing is the next

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 17






most critical item to which attention should be paid.  The




interior of the fan housing should be coated with the same




material as the fan impeller.  If all internal surfaces are



coated as mentioned above, it is recommended that the exterior




of the fan be provided with some type of corrosion protection



as well.






          If the fan housing is steel to which a coating will



be applied, then it should be so constructed that the coating



can be applied with integrity.  This means that all welds should




be ground smooth with a slight radius in all corners.  (Note



that a steel impeller must have similar preparation.)  All




coatings should be spark tested after they are applied to the




fan housing and the coating should be carried through to the




outside of all flanges and should overlap the edges of all




corners.






          If the fan housing is solid plastic, then it should




be stiffened adequately to withstand the negative static pres-



sures that may be encountered during normal operation or at




some future date.






          In addition to the above considerations, both the



fan housing and impeller should be constructed of materials which




are basically fire-retardant.  In the remote event of a fire

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 18






occurring in the ventilation system, the fan should be kept




on to remove the smoke and fumes from the burning area through




the exhaust system to the outside of the building.  Smoke



damage within the building itself sometimes can be more costly




than the fire damage to a localized area of the exhaust system.






          There are several additional accessory items which



should be provided to facilitate installation and operation




of the fan.  One such additional item is flexible connectors.



Flexible connectors to connect the ductwork to the inlet and




discharge side of the fan should be considered to isolate the



fan from the remainder of the duct system.  This tends to



reduce the sound transmitted to the entire ventilation system




by the fan, and it also will reduce any vibration which the




fan may transmit to the duct system.






          Another additional accessory item used with fans




should be vibration isolators.  Depending on the location




of fan mounting and the type of mounting supports, vibration



isolators should be definitely included in all fan instal-



lations.  This serves the same function as the flexible




connectors, that is, it tends to reduce the transmission of



noise and vibration from the fan to surrounding systems.

-------
Ventilation                                             Page 19






G.  Drains






          In conjunction with the exhaust system and fan,




condensate drains have been mentioned.  It should be pointed




out that these condensate drains should be connected to the



waste treatment area.  This is a potential source of toxic




contaminants/ and special provisions made to connect these




drain systems will prevent these contaminants from entering



the normal sanitary drain system or storm water system.  Note




that some hoods are also provided with condensate drains.




These should be connected to a seal leg or capped for periodic




drainage.  This will prevent exhaust air from being drawn into




this drain thus reducing the effectiveness of the hood.  These




drains should also be connected to the metal finishing waste



treatment system.

-------
                                                         Page 20







III.  Air Pollution Control Devices




A.  Introduction to Problem





          Metal finishing operations that are carried on within




liquid tanks create in general two different types of emissions.




One is emissions of a gaseous nature, and the other is emissions




of entrained liquid particulate.  In a very rare instance, mists




are formed, but these occurrences are so infrequent that they




will not  be the subject of any discussion within this paper.





          Gaseous contaminants can be defined as those specific




contaminants which are composed of gas molecules which are




controlled by their brownian movement and are generally in the




range of less than 0.01 micron in particle size.





          Entrained liquid particles are those contaminants which




are released from a bath due to air agitation, drippage, mechanical




agitation, etc. and which are generally 10 microns in size and




larger.





          A micron is defined as one-millionth of a meter which




is equivalent to roughly 1/25,000 of an inch.  For reference




purposes, it should be noted that the smallest individual




particle that can be detected with the naked eye has been




reported to be between 60 and 100 microns in size.  The average




human adult red blood cell is 7.5 ± 0.3 microns in particle size.

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 21






Tobacco smoke is generally defined as composed of solid particles




that range from 0.01 micron to'l micron in particle size.



This would give the metal finishing operator some appreciation




for the size of the particles with which he is dealing.






          The amount of air pollution control equipment required



and the efficiency with which this air pollution control equip-



ment must work will be dictated by local, state and federal



EPA regulations.  However, due to the nature of the specific




contaminants and the myriad of possible chemicals involved




in metal finishing operations, the present regulations are not




specific enough to permit a discussion in this paper of the




maximum emission levels for individual chemicals.   In some



cases, emission levels are specified as a maximum rate per pound




of work processed.  In other cases, there is no specific mention



of any of the normal contaminants found in a metal finishing



operation.  Some states do have emission regulations for such




items as hydrogen fluoride, sulfuric acid, and hydrochloric



acid, where a large segment of the state industrial complex




handles such items.






          There is a trend by the EPA to spell out in some



detail, limitations on specific contaminants.  It is expected




that such limitations will be established in detail for the

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 22






metal finishing industry in the very near future.  In the




meantime, some companies, in an effort to anticipate tentative




goals, have established that the scrubber or pollution control




device they install shall have an outlet concentration  of



the contaminants which does not exceed the threshold limit




value (TLV).






          There have been specific cases in the past where



metal finishers have been subjected to the "nuisance" clause.




The "nuisance" clause is generally included in most regulations,



and it is specifically included so that no industry or company




can interfere with the right of any individual to the pursuit



of his happiness and well-being or cause a nuisance which



interferes with that basic right.  There have been specific




cases where metal finishers have chromic acid emissions which



have caused damage to nearby property and houses, and these




have forced the particular company involved to make restitution



for this damage.  Subsequently, the company involved has been




obligated to install pollution control equipment which will




specifically remove all the chromic acid contaminants passing



through the system.  There have been other similar cases




involving other types of contaminants, but it should be noted



here that proper planning and care in the design of the exhaust




system as well as selection of the air pollution control device




will preclude such instances.

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 23






          As mentioned above, because of the fact that most



contaminants coming from a metal finishing operation are



either gaseous or entrained liquid particulate in nature,




wet scrubbers have generally been utilized for this type of



operation.  Wet scrubbers are considered to be a chemical



type of pollution control device (as opposed to a mechanical



or electrical device).






          A packed tower is generally recommended for control



of gaseous contaminants.  There are some scrubbers available




on the market which do provide a limited amount of gas absorption




through some other means other than a packed bed.  However, the




amount of absorption provided is limited, and if the objective



is to reach the TLV on the discharge side of the wet scrubber,




then a packed tower absorption device will definitely be required.




The packed tower scrubber generally uses a recirculation system



to recirculate the absorbing liquid through and across the packed




bed.  There are several different geometric modes of configuration



for a packed tower.  The geometric mode concerns itself with




the manner in which the liquid comes in contact with the gas.




In a countercurrent packed column, the liquid enters the top




of the column and flows countercurrent to the gas stream which




enters the bottom of the packed column.  In a crossflow packed



column, the gas flows horizontally through a packed bed, while

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 24






the liquid flows from the top of the packed bed down to the bottom




of the packed bed and discharges at the bottom while the gas




discharges through the rear of the packed bed.  See Figures



1 and 2 attached.






          For liquid entrainment removal, wet scrubbers of



various designs have been effectively employed to obtain



efficiencies in the range of 99+% removal.  The nature of the



liquid entrainment coming off the metal finishing operation




must be studied carefully.  If the tank is at room temperature,



the entrainment will generally be relatively large, that is,



probably 100 microns or larger.  For this particular type of



liquid entrainment, a simple air washer, which is essentially



an entrainment removal device with a washing action to keep



the concentration of the contaminants to a minimum, is all




that is required.  If the tank is heated, however, there is




some concern that smaller particles will be generated.  In




this particular case, the air washer or entrainment separator



should be selected with care since there is a possibility



that liquid particulate matter as small as 10 microns in size




can be emitted.






          In the case of chromic acid fumes, it is important




to remember that even a very small particulate droplet of




chromic acid can cause damage to painted surfaces.  For this

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 25






reason, an entrainment removal device which is efficient down



to the range of 3 to 5 microns is generally recommended.






B.  Recovery of Contaminants






          There have been many installations where the recovery



of contaminants from a metal finishing operation has proven



to be economical.  In general, in order to economically recover




the contaminants, the water which is used for washing and dilution



must be evaporated to increase the concentration of the con-




taminant to a level where it can be reused back into the metal



finishing process.






          An evaporator, utilizing a supply of heated water,




is generally recommended for such applications as nickel plating




and chrome plating operations where recovery can be economical.




The attached chart shows the results of such an evaporator



design and indicates the approximate range of inlet concentrations



over which an evaporator can be economically effective.

-------
           TYPICAL OPERATING DATA FOR CHROME AND
        NICKEL PLATING EVAPORATOR/SCRUBBER SYSTEMS*
     RECOVERY DATA

       Parameter
                         AVERAGE VALUE OVER
                            TEST PERIOD
Inlet Air
Rate - CFM
Temp./R.H.
Steam Usage Ib./min. @ 25 psi
Total Electrical Usage Amps @ 440V

Recycle Rate - GPM
Heat Exhanger Temp.

Reservoir Temp.
Evaporation Rate - GPM

Return Rate to Tank - GPM
Output Air     Temp.
               R.H.

Hourly Reclaim Rate (Ib./hr.)
  expressed as chrome or nickel
  solution
  Chrome

10,000 CFM
77° F/40%

    120
    200

    225
150-155° F

  114° F
    9.5

    1.5
  131° F
   100%

   215
   Nickel

10,000 CFM
77° F/40%

   120
   200

   225
150-155° F

  114° F
   9.5

   1.5
  131° F
   100%

    83
Operating Costs

    Item

Electrical @ 1.54 KWH
Steam @ $1.50/1000 Ib.

    Total Cost/hr.

Reclaim Cost  $/lb.

Orig. Chrome cost/lb.
                     Cost $/hr.

                      $0.35
                      $10.75

                      $11.10

                       5.2«/lb.

                      $0.50/lb.
                 Cost $/hr.

                  $0.35
                  $10.75

                  $11.10

                  13.4$/lb.

                  $1.50/lb.
*Based on actual case study using countercurrent flow packed
bed scrubber containing 4 feet of 1" Tellerettes.

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 26






          There have been many cases where an evaporator can



be effectively combined with a wet scrubber.  That is, the




wet scrubber serves a dual function—removal of contaminants



as well as recovery of same.  In order to effectively accomplish



this, additional equipment must be provided.  This additional



equipment involves a heat exchanger and extra piping as well



as arrangements to run a batch operation through the evaporator/



wet scrubber system.  In this particular case, the scrubbing



liquid is heated to a point where water is evaporated from the




air stream while the contaminant is being removed within the




packed bed.






          There are some cases where a separate evaporation



system can be economically justified.  A separate evaporation




system will be employed where a number of small scrubbing




installations are handled separately and the liquid from each



of these is fed to a single evaporator system.






C.  Water Consumption






          A wet scrubber, to be efficient, must raise the




relative humidity of the exitting air to the saturation level.



Since the relative humidity on the inlet side of the scrubber



is generally less than the saturation level, evaporation of




water is taking place within the scrubber itself.  For this

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 27






reason, a makeup supply of some type of relatively "fresh"



water must be added to the scrubber recirculation system.




The amount of water used as makeup must be greater than the




evaporative losses that can be expected within the scrubber




itself.






          If the contaminant being removed is of a gaseous nature,



then the amount of fresh water added to the system must be of



sufficient quantity and quality to permit the recirculation




solution to be kept well below the level where the concentration



of the contaminant in the liquid phase does not interfere with



the gas absorption rate.  For most metal finishing operations,



this amounts to a makeup rate of approximately 5-10% of the



total amount being recirculated in the scrubber system.






          In addition to the above considerations, there may



be a consideration to have the concentration of the contaminant




in the overflow of the scrubber in the range where it can be




effectively handled by the waste water treatment system which




is installed.






          Since the overall consumption of water for any metal




finishing operation is limited to keep the capital investment



of the waste water treatment system to a minimum, the source




of "fresh", water for the scrubbing system should be carefully

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 28


studied.  While it is best to use fresh city water for the

scrubbing solution, in some cases this "fresh" water can be

the clarified water from the waste treatment system.  That is,

the treated water from your waste treatment system could be

returned to the scrubbers as the fresh water supply, conse-

quently leading to recycling of the stream.  This will tend

to reduce the amount of city water being used in the system.


          In addition to this arrangement, there have been other

arrangements where the rinse water from the secondary or tertiary

rinse tank can be used as the fresh water makeup for the scrubber.

The concentration of the contaminants in the fresh water makeup

to the scrubber must be kept to a sufficiently low value to

preclude any release of this contaminant to the air stream

in the scrubber itself.  In some cases, even the primary rinse

tank may have a sufficiently low enough concentration to be

able to use this water as the makeup water to the scrubber.
                                                     >

          As a further water conservation practice, there have

been cases where the overflow from the scrubber is used as

makeup for a primary rinse tank.  This would be especially

beneficial when more than one rinse tank is employed in a

process.

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 29






          The exact nature of the supply of fresh water makeup



for a scrubber system can only be determined upon detailed




examination of the specific application.  Each application




must be weighed carefully with all the alternatives mentioned




above carefully considered, and the final selection based upon




the merits of the specific case in point.






          With the recirculation piping, drain line piping,




and other piping connections on the scrubber, care should be



taken that all of these are connected to the waste water treat-



ment system.






D.  Costs






          The attached table illustrates typical costs for the



installation of ventilation and air pollution control equipment



for some typical metal finishing operations.

-------
     TYPICAL COSTS OF VENTILATION SYSTEM
     BASIS OF COMPARISON

     1)  10,000 CFM for all systems
     2)  Static pressure loss in all air handling systems exclusive of scrubber  is  2.5  inches w.g.
     3)  Fan efficiency - 55%
     4)  Pump efficiency - 50%
     5)  Annual operating days - 300
     6)  Power cost - 1.5C per KWHR
     7)  All scrubbers 95% efficient or better

                                                                                           TOTAL
                                                                                 ANNUAL  INSTALLED
                          PRESSURE DROP    LIQUID RATE   HORSEPOWER  FIRST COST  POWER    COST
METAL
FINISHING
OPERATION
Chrome
Nickel
Zinc
Phosphate
Coat
TYPE OF
OF OF SCRUBBER PUMP
SCRUBBER SCRUBBER TOTAL RECIRCULATED* (A)
Counter cur rent 2"
Air Washer 1"
Crossflow 1.5"
Air Washer 0.7"
4.5"
3.5"
4.0"
3.2"
120
60
60
50
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.3
FAN
(B)
12.8
9.4
11.5
9.1
SCRUBBER
APPROX.
S
6000
3500
7000
3000
COST
$
(0
1490
837
1024
810
COMPLETE
SYSTEM
S
12,000
9,000
13,000
8,000
(A)  - Pump HP = 8.33 H s (gpm)       (B)  - Fan HP = .000157 Q  (in. w.c.)      (C) Operating Cost =
                33000 (50% eff)                           55% eff.
                                                                                Hrs  (HP) (.746)  (1.5)



     *NOTE:   Fresh makeup  rate will  be  from 5 to 10%  of this but no less then 3 gpm.

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 30






          The number of tanks being exhausted, as well as




exhaust rate, together with the size of the individual equip-



ment selected, will control the actual installation and operating




costs.






          Care should be exercised in the selection of the air



pollution control equipment so that the operating cost is not



excessive.  It is important to remember that as a rule-of-thumb



the operating costs of each motor used on the ventilation and



air pollution control system will range from $50 to $100 per




brake horsepower per year depending upon your local electrical




costs.  On a large system, this cost can quickly mount up to



a point where the savings of several inches of static pressure




of resistance within the system by careful selection of the




pollution control equipment and design of the ventilation system




can save many thousands of dollars of operating costs in a



year's period of time.






E.  Other Considerations






          Contained within the appendix of this paper are some



examples of ventilation systems employing air pollution control




devices which have been installed in metal finishing operations




at various locations throughout the country.

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 31






          In addition to the design considerations listed




above, there are several additional items which should be




mentioned in the ventilation of metal finishing operations



which should be taken into account on any installation.






          If the metal finishing operation includes cyanide



salts as one type of metal finishing solution and the cyanide




tanks must be exhausted, then the exhaust system for the cyanide




solutions should be kept separate from any exhaust system that




incorporates acid solutions.  This will preclude the formation




of any hydrogen cyanide within the exhaust system itself,




which could lead to potential problems.






          Normally, if there are alkali solutions which must



be exhausted which do not contain cyanide salts, these can



be combined with exhaust systems handling acid solutions so



that some neutralization within the duct system prior to the




scrubber can be effected.  This will serve to reduce the load



of acid contaminants entering the waste water treatment system.




However, this step should not be taken if recovery of the




acid contaminants is being attempted.






          There are some metal finishing operations which




utilize an ammonium based alkali within the tank system.




Any exhaust system which is venting an ammonia tank should

-------
Air Pollution Control Devices                           Page 32






be kept separate from an exhaust system that is handling hydro-




chloric acid.  The combination of ammonia and hydrochloric




acid in an exhaust system forms the compound ammonium chloride




(NH4C1).  Ammonium chloride, when it is formed, becomes a




submicron particulate matter which is impossible to remove




in any of the wet scrubbers discussed in this presentation.




Ammonium chloride can appear as a dense white cloud which can



lead to serious problems.  The metal finishing operator who



has an ammonium chloride effluent may find himself faced with



complaints from local citizens due to the reduced visibility



in the plant area.  The simple expedient of separating these



two exhaust stream internally and making certain that the



hydrochloric acid vapors are removed to a high efficiency



and then separating the exhaust points of these two by as wide




a distance as possible will help to preclude this possibility.

-------
                                                          Page 33






IV  Conclusion




          The design of a ventilation system for me'tal finishing




operation should be based on OSHA considerations within the




building.  The specific manner in which the exhaust fumes are




contained within the area and removed through the exhaust system




should be carefully studied so that the contaminants are kept




within a confined area.  The flow of fresh air should be con-




stantly past all work stations so that the TLV of the contaminants




is not exceeded.





          The exhaust system should be designed so that it




utilizes a minimum of static pressure resistance to keep the




operating costs down.  Use of corrosion resistant materials of




construction should be combined with fire-retardant characteristics




so that the effectiveness of the exhaust system does not




deteriorate with age.





          The fan and the pollution control device selected should




be constructed of similar corrosion resistant and fire-retardant




materials.  The air pollution control device selected should be




efficient enough to allow operation under existing codes.  Some




provisions can be made in many scrubber designs to increase the




efficiency at a later date.  However, care must be used in this

-------
Conclusion                                               Page 34





selection so that the fan capacity can be increased at slight



additional costs at some future date.
              condensate drains  and drain line connections to




the vet scrubber should be directed to the waste treatment




system to prevent contamination of ground water, sanitary or



storm sewer effluents.





          Careful consideration of the fresh water makeup to the




wet scrubber system should be included in the overall planning of




the waste water treatment system.





          A detailed evaluation of any vendor's proposal for the




complete exhaust system and/or pollution control devices should




include the major points covered in this paper.

-------
    APPENDIX




    INCLUDING




FLOOR PROTECTION

-------
I.  Floor Protection






          In the consideration of any waste water system,




some means of surface protection of the floor area around



the tanks is always included.  Surface protection of the



floor is required to protect the substrate (actual floor




material) from damage due to spills, splash, drippage, over-



flow, or catastrophe.  In the event of a catastrophe, it



is imperative that the liquids involved be all contained within




the area serviced by the waste water treatment system provided



for same.  Depending on the specific design utilized and the




extent of the catastrophe, spill, or other problem, the liquids



involved may have to be contained within this area for from



several minutes to several hours.  Obviously, the liquids




could cause severe damage to the substrate and even the




building and/or building foundation if the area is not prop-




erly protected.






          The type of material selected for this service




should be based on the following considerations:






          1.  Substrate material



          2.  Type of traffic, if any, that will be




              using this floor area

-------
Floor Protection                                         Page 2






          3.  Broad range corrosion resistance



          4.  First cost




          5.  Ease of installation and its cost




          6.  Repairability






          There are many different types of materials




available on the market.  Most of these materials are con-



sidered to be monolithics and are based on the use of a




thermosetting resin.  Thermosetting resins are those resins



which utilize a catalyst system.  They start off as a liquid



at room temperature to which the catalyst is added and,



depending upon the amount of catalyst and the temperature



and humidity, the resin "sets up" or becomes a solid with



an exothermic reaction within from 5 minutes to several hours.



Once this exothermic reaction is complete and the heat has



dissipated, the resin is fully cured and can usually be treated




in the same manner as the substrate.  The complete cure may



be complete within several hours, but most materials should




not be subjected to anything other than foot traffic for



from 24 to 48 hours after being fully installed.  Thermo-




setting resins include epoxies, polyesters, and furans,



although most floor protection materials are based on either




epoxies or polyester resins.

-------
Floor Protection                                          Page 3


           It is imperative to point out that there are prob-

 ably well over 100 different epoxy resins available as well

 as over 500 different polyesters.  However, limiting the

 materials to the considerations listed above will probably

 reduce these numbers to 20 and 100 respectively for epoxies

 and polyesters.  With this variety still available, the ideal

 material should be selected based on these parameters:


           1.  Corrosion resistance to a wide range of acids

               and alkalis

           2.  Low first cost and installation cost

           3.  High resistance to impact damage

           4.  High bond strength to substrate

           5.  Can be inspected visually and repaired easily


           The only other consideration is the amount of traffic
                                     •«»
 or type of load to which the material will be subjected.

 In some cases, the materials are applied using nothing more

 than an aggregate or other type of filler.  The aggregate

 is used to enhance impact strength, thermal expansion char-

 acteristics, and to provide additional thickness of material.

 In other cases, the same materials or slightly different

 formulations are used in conjunction with some type of addi-

 tional reinforcement such as glass cloth.

-------
Floor Protection                                         Page 4






          Reinforcement with glass cloth markedly increases



the impact strength of the material.  It also enhances other



properties which overall make this type of addition very



valuable in many instances.






          When taking all factors into consideration, a material




which approaches the ideal would be a modified glass rein-



forced polyester.  It has the following properties:






          A.  It is corrosion resistant to the vast majority




              of plating solutions.



          B.  It has a total installed cost of from $2.00



              to $3.00 per square foot which makes it



              economical.



          C.  It bonds tenaciously to the substrate and



              discourages undercutting so that cracks and



              damage are contained within a localized area.




          D.  The glass reinforcement provides high impact




              strength and permits the material to bridge




              minor shrinkage cracks in the substrate.



          E.  Cracks, if they do occur, can be repaired




              readily by maintenance personnel with minimum




              training.

-------
Floor Protection                                         Page 5






          F.  Cure is complete within hours so that downtime



              for repairs or interruption of initial con-



              struction can be held to minimum.




          G.  This material can also be applied to vertical




              surfaces so that curbs and walls can be given



              the same corrosion protection.  Thus, any



              chemicals involved in a catastrophic spill can



              be contained within the designated area serviced




              by the water treatment system.






          The best material selected for this service is




wasted if the proper consideration is not given to the overall



design of the substrate, the method of installation of the




material, and the surface preparation.  Areas that warrant



particular attention include floor drains, joints between




walls and floors, etc.  Illustrated here are the methods



that are generally used to handle these potential trouble




areas.






          Note that before the installation of any monolithic




material the substrate must have the surface preparation




recommended by the manufacturer.  For most monolithics, when




concrete is the substrate, the surface preparation is generally




a steel trowel finish followed by acid etching of the fully





cured concrete.

-------
                                                         Page 6






II.  Protection of Equipment






          In addition to protection of the floor under the




tanks, consideration should also be given to protection of



other areas.  Whenever corrosive chemicals are used, all



equipment exposed to the same atmosphere or in direct contact



with the chemicals is subjected to rapid degradation.  Equip-



ment and areas in this category include:




          a) The exterior of the tanks



          b) All surfaces of a plating machine




          c) Structural steel used anywhere in the vicinity




             of the corrosive chemicals



          d) Utility connections or pipelines that are located



             within the area where floor protection is provided.






          Equipment installed in a metal finishing operation



is expensive to replace.  It is also extremely expensive




if the equipment must be repaired constantly.






          One of the best questions that is always asked in



conjunction with any discussion of catastrophes in a plating




area is "How could they occur?".  There is probably no better



response or more likely occurence than through the forces of



corrosion and neglect.  Therefore, it is economic folly when




considering floor protection not to investigate the possibility

-------
Protection of Equipment                                  Page 7






of providing similar protection to all equipment contained




within the floor area which will be protected.






          With the normal maintenance that will be required




by your treatment plant and equipment, as well as the plating




equipment itself, corrosion protection of tanks, machinery,




and structural steel will reduce maintenance on these items




freeing your people to maintain critical equipment.  It will




also materially lessen the chances of a catastrophic event.






          Corrosion protection for these parts and areas




can be provided by coatings which are readily applied by




brush or spray and which have the same properties and cor-




rosion resistance as the monolithics used on the floor.






          Typical of such materials is a flake reinforced




polyester.  These are available in the same grades as the




monolithics and can be applied to a thickness of from 15 to




30 mils at a nominal cost.  The typical installation will




range from $0.80 to $1.50 per square foot, depending on the




amount of surface area being covered and the complexity of




shape.  This means this material is competitive with most




epoxy, vinyl, or similar paint systems used as coatings.




The advantage of this type of coating is its superior impact




resistance, better thermal shock resistance, lower expansion




coefficient, and resistance to undercutting.

-------
Protection of Equipment                                  Page 8






          These coatings have been field proven in years of




trouble-free service where they have eliminated the usual




annual reapplication of materials that is normal with most




paint systems in corrosive areas.  They are also readily




cleaned with a water flush and could even be brushed with




a stiff bristle brush without fear of damage.

-------
                                                         Page 9






III.  Other Considerations






          It is obvious that the area occupied by the waste



water treatment should receive the same considerations.



Although the function here is one of neutralization of cor-




rosives, it should also be realized that the same type of



spills, leaks, splash and other minor occurences could cause



serious damage to floors, tank exteriors, structural work, etc.






          In addition, serious consideration should be given




to the manner and means in which the liquid effluent from




the metal finishing area is transported to the treatment




plant.  Pipelines must be properly installed and completely




corrosion resistant both inside and out.  Trenches, if used,



should be similarly protected.






          In all cases, wherever corrosive chemicals are



used within the plant, careful attention should be given to




corrosion protection of all surfaces in those areas where



the chemicals are received, stored, consumed, transported




to the waste treatment plant, and where they are finally




neutralized.

-------
3.31 Expansion Joints
for monolithic floor
                    3.321  Drains
                    for monolithic floor
3.322 Drains
for brick floor
 Monolithic Topping
            Expansion Joint
    [wr«$fl
    &&$$
    W3C.iOty£
    SXS ^ *N 'SS + /// \W^/ \\\
\
          Pre-formed Joint
                                                 Expansion Joint

                                  Monolithic Topping
                                                                  Expansion Joint Material
                                                                                 Acidproof Brick
                                                    Acidproof
                                                    Cement
                                                                  Membrane
                                                                                 Concrete slab

-------
Fig. Ill ACIDPROOF BRICK &
     MEMBRANE CONSTRUCTION
        Membrane seals and protects concrete
        substrate.
        Acidproof  brick protects  membrane from
        impact, abrasion, and thermal shock.


        •Acidproof  cement bonds  brick solidly in
        place and prevents liquids  from seeping
        through to the membrane.
          ^^
           Acidproof Membrane,
        Brick & Cement Construction
                                                            Fig. IV GROUTED
                                                                     BRICK CONSTRUCTION
Ribbed bottom vitrified tile or brick set in
uncured base of cement and sand.


Tiles tamped evenly in place with W joint
spacing.
Joints grouted flush with acidproof cement
after base cures.

 Grouted Brick Construction

-------
             3.331  Brick Wall Coving
             Flexible  resin-based  membrane pro-
             tecting the concrete substrate is carried
             up the wall behind coving. All joints
             are made with acidproof cement.
                       Brick
                             Acidproof Cement
                             Joints

                              Membrane
            3.332 Monolithic Wall Coving
            Lining for  wall  is applied  first  and
            feathered down over the floor. Mono-
            lithic floor topping is then trowelled up
            to the side wall and the joint is addi-
            tionally  protected  with  polysulfide
            sealant.
             Monolithic  Wall Lining
                        Expansion Joint Sealant
                                                                           Monolithic  Topping
3.34 Brick & Monolithic Column Bases
Both types are treated essentially the same as side-
wall covings for the respective materials.
Mor
i
lolithic Topping
Monolithic
Lining
\ A
Expansion ^
Joint
r *
i
Expansion Joint




'%
	 ^



i —
3
^-—
^



Acidproof
Brick
/Monolithic
Membrane
* 1 1 IV


3.351 Monolithic Floor Combined
        With Acidproof Brick Trenches
Trench is lined with flexible membrane. Brick is then
layed  up with  acidproof cement.  Glass reinforced
monolithic floor  topping  is  trowelled  across the
header course to  completely seal the joint between
the concrete  trench and its brick lining.

    Reinforced  Monolithic Topping
a • a. • A
•a • a .




4 '
•a



—


-




Membrane





1 1 1 1^1 1 1 1

=1
i








3.352 Monolithic Trenches
Consists  of  reinforced  monolithic lining  material
specially formulated for vertical surfaces. Note that
lining runs up on to the floor, and that the floor top-
ping is brought to  the edge of the trench to com-
pletely seal the monolithic joint.
          Monolithic Topping
\ ^




Monolithic Lining
4 	 Glass Cloth
Reinforcement

&:X '
'• A



 3.36 Monolithic Pump Base
 Top and sides of the base are covered with  mono-
 lithic lining which is feathered over the floor.  Mono-
 lithic floor topping is then trowelled on floor area and
 lapped up the side of the base. Use of reinforcement
 is determined by service conditions.
                                                                                                                Monolithic  Flooring
                                                                                                                                         Monolithic  Lining

-------
                                          Cleaned
                                            Gas
Contaminated
    Gas
                                                                    \]	   Liquid  Inlet
                                    Counter-Current Flow

-------
                          Liquid
                           Inlet
=^>
Contaminated
   Gas
                                                                                        Cleaned
                                                                                          Gas
                                                              Crossflow

-------
           FIELD JOIMT AT ROOF
           ROOF SKIRT BY Cf iLCOTi
          G IN ROOF
FIELD JOINT
                                                           O
                                                           UJ
                                                           a:
                                                           I
                                                           Uj
                                                           t—
                                                           10

                                                           in

                                                           O
                                                                    §
                                                                           Si
                                                                          ra
                                                                        OS
                                                                        o
                                                                        u
                                                                        u

                                                                        UJ
                                                                               ro
       DQ
                                                                        H

                                                                        ul
                                                                        0.
I
UJ
k-
(f)
>
(D
                                                                        LLJ
                                                                        0
                                                                        O
                                                                        O
                                                                              o
                                                                              o
u

E
UJ
~n
u

O

-------
CUSTOMER
                                                                                       DCSCRIPTION
                                                          CU5T. DWG. No.
                                                          OPERATING CONDITIONS
                                                          PRESSURE- DESIGN
                                                                                          PRESSURE.OPERATING
                                                          CONSTRUCTION
           THE  CEILCOTE  CO.. INC.



 140 SHELDON RO.                       BEREA (CLEVELAND), OHIO



tUOTE No.	    [ S. O.	 »MT.         OF


JHAWN CV-S   CHK'D.       I APPH.         -_               «*•
^^	  I	I		 f^

>AT£         DAT!        | DATE         V>"

-------
DURACOR  VENTILATION   SYSTEM
      THE  CEILCOTE
140 SHELDON ROAD
CO.,  INC.
 BEREA (CLEVELAND) OHIO
                    STEEL   CO.

-------

-------

-------

-------