EPA-600/2-75-029
September 1975
Environmental Protection Technology Series
                                 MEASUREMENTS OF
            ACTIVE BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS  IN
      BIOLOGICAL  WASTE TREATMENT PROCESSES

                            Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
                                   Office of Research and Development
                                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                         Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

-------
                    RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports  of  the  Office  of  Research  and  Development,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  have  been grouped into
five series.   These  five broad  categories vere  established to
facilitate further development  and application  of environmental
technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in
related fields.  The five series are:

           1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
           2.  Environmental Protection Technology
           3.  Ecological Research
           A.  Environmental Monitoring
           5.  Socioeconomic  Environmental  Studies

 This report  has  been assigned  to  the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
 TECHNOLOGY STUDIES  series.   This  series  describes  research
 performed to develop and demonstrate instrumentation, equipment
 and methodology  to  repair or prevent environmental degradation from
 point and non-point sources of pollution.   This work provides the
 new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
 of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.
   This document  is  available to the public through the National
   Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia   22151.

-------
                                         EPA-600/2-75-029
                                         September  1975
MEASUREMENTS OF ACTIVE BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS IN
      BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT PROCESSES
                       By
                 F. 6. Pohland
                   S. J. Kang
          School of Civil Engineering
        Georgia Institute of Technology
             Atlanta, Georgia 30332
         Grant No. R-800354 (17050 GAI)
           Program Element No. 1BB043
                Project Officer

                Ronald F. Lewis
          Wastewater Research Division
  Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
             Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
  MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

-------
                               DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publica-
tion.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                                      ii

-------
                                   FOREWORD
     Man and his environment must be protected from the adverse effects of
pesticides, radiation, noise, and other forms of pollution, and the unwise
management of solid waste.  Efforts to protect the  environment  requires focus
that recognizes the interplay between the components of our physical environ-
ment—air, water, and land.  The Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
contributes to this multidisciplinary focus through programs engaged in

     t    studies on the effects of environmental contaminants on the
          biosphere, and

     0    a search for ways to prevent contamination and to recycle valuable
          resources

     As part of these activities, the study described herein presents an
evaluation of the use of the determination of dehydrogenase enzyme activity
for the accurate measurement of active biomass in both batch and continuous
cultures grown on a variety of substrates in the biological wastewater
treatment processes and may be a useful tool for the determination and close
control of the biomass in the processes.
                                       A. W. Breidenbach, Ph.D
                                       Director
                                       Municipal Environmental
                                       Research Laboratory
                                      iii

-------
                                   ABSTRACT

     This research was initiated to determine the applicability and limitations
of the dehydrogenase test for the measurement of active biomass in biological
wastewater treatment processes.  Pure culture with E. coli and/or heterogeneous
culture batch studies were conducted on a variety of substrates including
glucose, galactose, sucrose, alanine, acetic acid, and selected industrial
wastewaters.  Also conducted were continuous aerobic or anaerobic culture
studies with and without solids recycle.  Dehydrogenase activity was monitored
along with other parameters including plate count, Coulter Counter enumeration,
adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and suspended solids to provide comparative and
complementary information on the biomass concentration.
     Dehydrogenase activity was a very sensitive and accurate measure of active
biomass throughout the growth phases especially during endogenous growth but
showed limitations with the nutrient deficient cultures.  The correlation
between dehydrogenase activity and suspend solids was constant at varying
retention times, or at all growth rates with or without solids recycle.
Consequently, a standard curve could be developed for given wastewaters by
operating the measurement of active biomass and thereby effectively controlling
the biological process.
     The measurement of ATP was also a reliable new technique for measurement
of active biomass except more study on the extraction method is required as
well as investigations on the change of the correlation with suspended solids
with the change of growth, rate.
     The technique for dehydrogenase activity measurement is simple, less costly
and gives more reliable and interpretable results.
     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. R800354 (17050 GAI)
by the School of Civil Engineering,  Georgia Institute of Technology under partial
sponsorship of the U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency.
                                     iv

-------
                                    CONTENTS

 SECTION                                                              PAGE

   I    CONCLUSIONS  	       1
  II    RECOMMENDATIONS  	       2
 III    REVIEW  OF THE  LITERATURE  	       3
  IV    INTRODUCTION   	      25
       a)  Experimental Apparatus  for
               Pure Culture  Studies  	      25
               Heterogeneous Culture  Studies	      28
       b)  Culture Preparation 	      30
       c)  Analytical Techniques  	      30
               Coliform Analysis	      31
               Solids Determination  	      31
               Substrate Concentration  	      32
               Coulter Counter Analysis  	      34
               Adenosine Tri-Phosphate Analysis  	      34
               Dehydrogenase Analysis    	      39
  V    PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS  	      46
       BATCH STUDIES WITH E^ coli   	      46
       BATCH STUDIES WITH HETEROGENEOUS CULTURES  	.	      70
       CONTINUOUS CULTURE STUDIES   	      93
       CONTINUOUS CULTURE STUDIES WITH SOLIDS RECYCLE	      94
       NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY STUDY  	     116
 VI    REFERENCES 	     127
VII    APPENDICES 	     135

-------
                                  TABLES
No..                                                                     Mi

 1            Minimal Substrate for Batch Cultures  	     26
 2            Comparison of ATP Contents Extracted  by DMSO
                 and by Nitrogen Bombing 	     37
 3            Effects of Freezing and Nitrogen Bombing on ATP
                Contents Extracted  	     40
 4            Comparison of Sample Pretreatraent Method for
                Dehydrogenase Analysis  	     45
 5            Pure Culture Batch No. 1 with Glucose 	     48
 6            Pure Culture Batch No. 2 with Glucose 	     49
 7            Pure Culture Batch No. 3 with Glucose 	     50
 8            Pure Culture Batch No. 4 with Galactose  	     51
 9            Pure Culture Batch No. 5 with Galactose  	     52
 10            Pure Culture Batch No. 6 with Galactose	     53
 11            Pure Culture Batch No. 7 with Sucrose	     54
 12            Pure Culture Batch No. 8 with Acetic  Acid  	     55
 13            Pure Culture Batch No. 9 with Acetic  Acid  	     56
 14            Pure Culture Batch No. 10  with  L-Alanine	     57
 15            Pure Culture Batch No. 11  with  Benzoic Acid  	     58
 16            Heterogeneous Culture  Batch No. 1 with Glucose 	     72
 17            Heterogeneous Culture  Batch No. 2 with Glucose 	     73
 18            Heterogeneous Culture  Batch No. 3 with Galactose 	     74
 19            Heterogeneous Culture  Batch No. 4 with Galactose .....     75
 20            Heterogeneous Culture  Batch No. 5 with Sucrose 	     76
 21            Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 6 with Acetic Acid ...     77
 22            Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 7 with L-Alanine 	     78
 23            Heterogeneous Anaerobic  Culture Batch No.  1 with
                 Leachate 	     86
 24            Heterogeneous Anaerobic  Culture Batch No.  2 with
                 Leachate 	    87
 25            Heterogeneous Anaerobic  Culture Batch No.  3 with
                 Leachate	    88
                                      vi

-------
                               TABLES (Continued)

No.                                                                      Page

26            Ratio between  Biomass  Parameters during  Log  Growth
                Phase of Batch Cultures	      92
27            Continuous Culture Study with Glucose  Substrate  	      97
28            Continuous Culture Study with Galactose  Substrate  ....      98
29            Continuous Culture Study with Shellfish  Processing
                Wastes	      99
30            Continuous Culture Study the Chicken Processing
                Wastes  	     100
31            Continuous Culture Study with Leachate 	     101
32            Anaerobic Digester with Heterogeneous  Cultures in
                 Continuous  Flow System	     102
33            Summary of Correlations between Biomass  Parameters
                in Continuous Culture Studies 	     109
34            Kinetic Growth Constants	     110
35            Continuous Culture Study with Galactose  Substrate and
                with Solids  Recycle  	     Ill
36            Summary of Growth Constants and Ratios between Para-
                meters in Soilids Recycle Study with Galatose  Sub-
                strate  	     112
37            Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 1  (C/N  - 10)	     H7
38            Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No, 2  (C/N  » 20)	     H8
39            Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 3  (C/N  - 30)	     119
40            Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 4  (C/P  - 150) ...     120
41            Comparison of  Biomass  from Nutrient Deficient Culture
                Studies 	     121
                                   vii

-------
                                     FIGURES

 No.                                                                      Page

  1           Biological Monitoring Tests 	       4
  2           DNA Extraction-Analysis Procedure 	       8
  3           Transfer Mechanisms of Intermediate Substrate
                Metabo lism 	      22
  4           Reactor Assembly for Pure Culture Studies 	      27
  5           Reactor Assembly for Heterogeneous Culture Studies
                with Solids Recycle	      29
  6           Comparison of ATP Contents Extracted by DMSO and by
                Nitrogen Bombing 	      33
  7           Apparatus for the Dehydrogenase Test 	      AT
  8           Correlation between Dehydrogenase Activity and Bio-
                mass Concentrations 	      ^
  9           Pure Culture Batch No.  1 with £_._ coli and Glucose
                Substrate	      50
 10           Pure Culture Batch No.  2 with E.  coli and Glucose
                Substrate 	      g0
 11           Pure Culture Batch No.  3 with E.  coli and Glucose
                Substrate 	      61
 12           Pure Culture Batch No.  4 with E.  coli and Galactose
                Substrate 	      62
 13           Pure Culture Batch No.  5 with E.  coli and Galactose
                Substrate 	      &3
 14            Pure Culture Batch No.  6 with E.  coli and Galactose
                Substrate 	      64
 15            Pure Culture Batch No.  7 with E.  coli and Sucrose
                Substrate 	•	      55
 16            Pure  Culture Batch No.  8 with  E^_  coli and Acetic Acid
                Substrate  	      66
 17            Pure  Culture Batch No.  9 with  E^  coli and Acetic Acid
                Substrate  	      67
lg            Pure  Culture Batch No.  10 with E.  coli and L-Alanine
                Substrate  	      68
                                      viii

-------
                             FIGURES  (Continued)

Np_._                                                                     Page

19           Pure Culture Batch No. 11 with E. coll and Benzole Acid
               Substrate 	       69
20           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 1 with Glucose Sub-
               strate 	       79
21           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 2 with Glucose Sub-
               strate 	       80
22           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 3 with Galactose Sub-
               strate 	       81
23           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 4 with Galactose Sub-
               strate 	       82
24           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 5 with Sucrose Sub-
               strate 	       83
25           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 6 with Acetic Acid
               Substrate 	       84
26           Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 7 with L-Alanine
               Substrate 	       85
27           Heterogeneous Anaerobic Culture Batch No. 1 with
               Leachate 	       89
28           Heterogeneous Anaerobic Culture Batch No. 2 with
               Leachate 	       90
29           Heterogeneous Anaerobic Culture Batch No. 3 with
               Leachate 	       91
30           Continuous Culture Study with Glucose Substrate  	      103
31           Continuous Culture Study with Galactose  Substrate  ....      104
32           Continuous Culture Study with Shellfish  Processing
               Wastes 	      105
33           Continuous Culture Study with Chicken Processing
               Wastes 	      106
34           Continuous Culture Study with Leachate  	      107
35           Anaerobic Digester with Heterogeneous Cultures in
               Continuous Flow System 	      108
                                      ix

-------
                             FIGURES (Continued)

No.                                                                      Page

36           Continuous Culture Study with Galactose Substrate
               and with Solids Recycle  	      113
37           Active Biomass Measurements in Continuous Culture
               Study with Solids Recycle 	      114
38           Effect of Specific Growth Rate on Correlations between
               Biomass Measurements in Continuous Culture Study with
               Solids Recycle 	      115
39           Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 1 (C/N - 10) 	      122
40           Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 2 (C/N =20) 	      123
41           Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 3 (C/N =30) 	      124
42           Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 4 (C/P = 150) ...      125

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The research reported herein was performed in the Sanitary Engineering
Laboratory, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.  The research
team which directed the project and prepared the report consisted of
Dr. Frederick G. Pohland, Project Director and Shin Joh Kang, Research
Associate.
     This project was sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency,
with Dr. Ronald F. Lewis serving as Project Officer.
                                     xi

-------
                                   SECTION I

                                  CONCLUSIONS

     The use of dehydrogenase activity for the measurement of active biomass
in the biological wastewater treatment process has proven very sensitive
and effective in both batch and continuous cultures grown on a variety of
substrates.
     Definite relationships between plate count, Coulter Counter enumeration,
solids and dehydrogenase activity were established during the log growth
phase of batch cultures with E_._ coll.
     Dehydrogenase activity is a more sensitive measure for active biomass
under substrate limited endogenous growth.
     ATP and dehydrogenase activity have shown a very similar pattern of
measurements throughout the log and stationary phases of heterogeneous
batch cultures except for lag observed during the anaerobic culture studies.
     The correlation between dehydrogenase activity and suspended solids
in continuous culture remained constant at all  growth rates.
     Except for nutrient deficient conditions where nitrogen and phosphorus
are limiting, dehydrogenase activity was an acceptable measure of active
biomass.
     The correlation between dehydrogenase activity and suspended solids
was constant but lower in continuous culture with solids recycle than
without recycle.  The existance of partial endogenous growth in the
cultures did not affect this relationship.
     When measured with wastes of different organic characteristics, the
dehydrogenase activity per unit biomass changed in both batch and continuous
culture.
     The technique for dehydrogenase measurement is less costly and tedious
than other biomass parameters such as ATP and yields more reliable and
interpretable results.

-------
                                  SECTION II

                                RECOMMENDATIONS

     Based on batch and continuous studies with pure and heterogeneous cultures
under aerobic and anaerobic environments, it is recommended that pilot plant
or field investigations at selected wastewater treatment plants be conducted
to establish the validity and applicability of the correlations determined
during these studies and to develop a standard techniques for the use of
dehydrogenase activity measurements in the design and control of biological
treatment processes.

-------
                                 SECTION III

                         REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Introduction;

     The adequacies of available parameters for design and operation of
water pollution control systems have become particurly apparent during
recent years as requirements for increased treatment efficiency have
intensified.  Use of inappropriate analytical measurements has often
resulted in poor performance which must be elminiated in order to
meet current and projected demands for quality control.  Biological
monitoring procedures also suffer from such deficiencies and of those
methods available (Figure 1), the determination of active biomass has
become one of the most controversial.
     One approach to the measurement of active biomass has been the adapta-
tion of enzyme activity analysis to heterogeneous biological populations.
In order to be successful, certain criteria must be satisified including:

     1.  a definite relationship between the gross enzyme concentration
         measured and the active (viable) biological population present
         in the system;

     2.  a similar enzyme concentration level for all bacterial species
         found in the system;

     3.  a resistance to variations in gross enzyme concentration with
        changes in environment or exposure to stress;

     4.  a methodology providing quantitative information not influenced
         by variations in the dissolved and suspended chemical constituents
         or physical characteristics of the system; and

     5.  a sufficient quantity of measurable indicator of enzyme activity
         to permit reasonable accuracy and precision.

-------
                   Total Mixed Liquor

                    Suspended Solids
                                              MLSS
                                               I
                                              TSS
VSS
               £
     Suspended
       Solids

      Organic
       Inert
       Solids
     Suspended
      Solids

     Inorganic
               Cells
         trate
DNA Content

Glucose Uptake Method
 Substrate
Measurement
      Inactive  or
    Dead Cells
1
Active, Viable
Cells
Warburg
* 02 Uptake
fc NAT) fc NAT)

                    Dehydrogenase Activity
                           (TTC—
       Figure 1.  Biological Monitoring Tests
                                               (1)

-------
     Three parameters which have received consideration for adaption to
biological treatment processes include the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
content of bacteria, the dehydrogenase activity of bacterial cultures
and bacterial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content.  These methods are
based upon several fundamental premises, viz., DNA is a nuclear con-
stituent indigenous to all living cells; the dehydrogenases are vital
to all biologically mediated reactions; and, bacterial ATP is associated
only with living cells as a source of energy for biosynthesis and metabolism.
Since the thrust of the research reported herein has been to further develop
an adequate biochemical parameter to indicate active biomass content in
biological waste treatment systems, a critical review of the available
literature was considered in order.  Similar reviews have been prepared
by Patterson, et al.    and Weddle and Jenkins    in separate investi-
gations.  The former authors considered the measurement of cellular
ATP superior to dehydrogenase activity determinations because of inter-
ferences of test reagents (TTC) with normal cell metabolism and difficulties
in interpretation of results with the latter technique as compared with
rapidity, simplicity and sensitivity of the ATP analysis.  Conversely,
the latter authors considered both parameters valid with ATP content
remaining constant over a wide range of growth conditions.  Similarly,
the dehydrogenase enzyme activity as well as the oxygen uptake rate
remained constant over a net growth rate range of 0.03-6.0 day   for
the systems investigated.

DNA Methodology and Application:

     General Perspective - Numerous papers have been published over the
past twenty years on the quantitative determination of deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA) in various biological systems.  Almost all cellular DNA
(2 95%) is found in the nucleus and distributed throughout the nucleoplasm
as chromatin while the cell is in the resting state  (i.e., engaged  in
maintenance and growth between cell division).  In anticipation of
division and during its course, the chromatin becomes highly organized
into distinct linear structures called chromosomes.  The number of  chromo-
somes per somatic cell is constant and this constant complement is  passed

-------
 on to a daughter cell as a result of mitotic divisionv  .   The microbial
 concentration of DNA has been shown to be invariant with physiological
 state and fairly constant among various bacterial species  with an average
 of 2 x 103 ug/mg of cell material.(5)6)
      DNA is a macromolecule which consists of a sequence of nucleotides
 linked together by phosphoric acid  in a diester linkage; the nucleotides
 in DNA molecule consist  of a 2-deoxy-D-ribose (carbohydrate) moiety with
 one of four bases (i.e.,  purines and pyriraidines) attached to the
 hydroxyl group on C-l' carbon atom.   These four bases are  thymine,
                                (4 7)
 cytosine,  adenine,  and guanine.   '

      Development of Analytical Methods - DNA determinations were  originally
 made indirectly by gently heating an assay sample in dilute alkali  so
 that the ribonucleic acid (RNA)  would be degraded to acid  soluble
 nucleotides allowing the  DNA fraction to remain unhydrolyzed and  to
 precipitate in dilute acid.   By  determining the carbohydrate and  phos-
 phate content of the acid-insoluble  fraction,  the initial  DNA content
 could be calculated   .   The ultraviolet absorption of  the purine or
 pyrimidine  moieties in the region of 270-357 mu although specific
 requires the  selection of  suitable DNA standards since  the proportion
                                                         /Q\
 of purines  to pyrimidines  varies  according to  the source   .   Webb
 and Levy    developed a colorimetric test  for  the direct measurement
 of the deoxyribose  moiety  of DNA  with p-nitro-phenylhydrazine  to  yield
 a  blue-colored  product.   DNA hydroloyzed in TCA (trichloroacetic  acid)
 reacted  quantitatively with  p-nitrophenylhydrazine.   When  the  product
was  separated  from  interfering substances,  it  was  determinable colori-
raetrically  in alkaline solution.  The blue color developed in  accordance
with  Beer's law over a range of 10 to 300  ug of DNA producing  five  times
the color intensities and  was more specific than the early diphenylamine
reagent  used  in tissue and microorganism studies.   It was  postulated
that  the deoxypentose resulting from the hydroloysis  forms a hydrazone
when heated with  the phenylhydrazine  derivative in  the  presence of  TCA.
However, while  the  chromogenic compound  was more intensely colored,
the color started to fade  almost  immediately so that  optical densities
of all samples had  to be recorded at  approximately  the  same  time.   DNA

-------
values on biological materials determined by reaction with p-nitrodipheny-
Ihydrazine have been found to be generally lower than those values noted
by reaction with diphenylaraine reagent.  These lower results may be
explained by assuming that p-nitrodiphenylamine does not give color
with protein or protein breakdown products resulting from TCA hydroly-
sis.  It was observed, however, that in the presence of proteins and
protein degradation products, the diphenylaznlne reagent did give high
DNA values.  Other carbohydrates present which might be capable of
reacting with p-nitrodiphenylhydrazine either do not form colored
products in alkaline medium or are extracted along with excess reagents
by butyl acetate when in TCA solution thereby eliminating the need
for any prior tissue or microorganism preparation.  The DNA extracted
from pure culture organisms yielded an average DNA content of bacterial
cells of 3.8 percent on a dry weight basis.
                          (9-11)
     Agardy and co-workers       studied a method of determining the DNA
content of anaerobic fermentation but detected a green color developed
in the reaction with diphenylamine which tended to obscure the charac-
teristic blue color.  Even with the purification of diphenylamine and
numerous washings of the cellular material, the green color could not
be controlled in anaerobic digesting sludges    .  The extraction and
quantification of bacterial DNA was a three-stage process consisting
of rupture of the bacterial cell, extraction of protein-bound DNA,
hydrolysis, and evaluation of DNA content.  A schematic diagram of
the procedure has been included in Figure 2.
     Agardy and co-workers     also used DNA content determinations as a
digester loading parameter to relate the daily organic load applied
to a biological system to some measure of the system's microorganism
content.  The values of DNA found in field digesters were higher
than expected when compared with values reported in the literature
for pure cultures of bacteria  (3.1 to 4.8% of the volatile solids).
It was concluded that either the organism concentration during sludge
digestion at detention times in excess of 20 days was higher than
anticipated or interfering substances such as sugars and aldehydes
were present in relatively high concentrations so as to affect the
DNA determination.

-------
            Bacterial Cell Suspension
                            Ultrasonic
                            Vibration
                  Broken Cells
                           Cold TCA
                           (centrifuge extraction)
Acid Soluble
  Fraction
Residue
                                                   Ethanol
                                                   Extraction
             Phospholipids
                Lipids
        Residue
                                                        Hot  TCA
                                                        Extraction
                           Acid Soluble
                             Fraction
               Residue
                                      Hot Diphenylamine
                                           Reaction
                            Blue  Color
         Figure 2.   DNA Extraction-Analysis Procedure
                                                      (9)

-------
           U-2)
     Fisher     used a modified method in analyzing digester sludge.
When the DNA in the sludge samples was allowed to react with hot con-
centrated sulfuric acid, a yellow color resulted during hydrolysis
and extraction; however, when concentrated sodium hydroxide was sub-
stituted in the first extraction-hydrolysis step, no interfering yellow
color resulted.  Recovery studies proved the modified DNA extraction
technique to be quantitative.

     Hattingh and Siebert  '     increased the sensitivity of the DNA method
by adding an aldehyde to the diphenylamine reagent.  The alcohol-ether
extraction proposed by Agardy     was considered unnecessary.  Moreover,
the acid-soluble compounds of the cell debris were considered responsible
for the interfering green color.  DNA was liberated from the sludge
with sodium lauryl sulfate by ultrasonic vibration.  The supernatant
liquor was collected after centrifugation and the DNA was precipitated
with perchloric acid at 70°C instead of the usual boiling for 15 minutes.
This method resulted in 99 and 100 percent recovery of DNA from anaerobic
sludge with the addition of aldehyde to the diphenylamine reagent serving
                                          /g\
to stabilize and intensify the blue color   .

     Application and Results - Genetelli    developed and evaluated organic
loading parameters for an activated sludge system based upon DNA and the
organic nitrogen used as measures of the system's organism concentration.
It was concluded that a loading parameter for activated sludge may be
based on pounds of BOD per day per pound of DNA  in the aeration basin.
A parameter based upon DNA was more universally  applicable with different
feed substrates than one based upon nitrogen.  DNA content was considered
much more sensitive to changes in sludge volume  index  (SVI) than solids
or nitrogen concentration because it reflected the variations in
bacterial concentration and  the shift  in  type of microorganism contributing
to the active  biomass.  The  DNA content of sludge was applied as a process
control parameter indicative of the type  of microorganisms present in
the sludge  (i.e., zoogleal floes or a  more filamentous masses).  The DNA
content decreased prior to an  increase in  SVI and  an abrupt  change in  the
DNA content indicated an approaching change in the settleability of  the
sludge.
                                     9

-------
                 (14)
      Holm-Hansen     applied DNA content to marine samples  as  a biomass
 parameter and to calculate growth rates at various oceanographic depths.
 A micromethod for DNA was  developed based upon the measurement of the
 fluorescence of the  complex formed by samples containing DNA incubated
 with diaminobenzoic acid dihydrochloride (DABA).   The  sensitivity of
 the  method was in the 0.2  ug to  40 yg DNA range.   To use DNA as a biomass
 indicator, it was considered necessary to relate  DNA content of the
 sample  to a cellular  entity such as total organic carbon (TOG).   DNA
 to TOC  ratios were higher  than those observed by  methods such  as plate
 count or  microscopic  enumeration.   The data indicated  that  there was
 a considerable quantity of living material that was high in DNA and/or
 that the  DNA was  associated with particulate  non-living  material.
      Irgens     investigated the use  of  DNA concentrations  of  activated
 sludge  as an estimate of the viable population based on  the premise
 that the  DNA released from dead  cells was readily degraded  by  activated
 sludge.   DNA constituted about four percent of the volatile matter of
                                                  _9
 cells assuming that weight of one  cell was 1  x 10  milligram.   DNA
 could then be expressed as a percent  of  volatile  solids  in  the  sludge
 samples.   The bacterial population of sewage,  based upon DNA content,  was
 determined to be  4.1  x 10~  cells/ml  of  sewage.
ATP Methodology andApplication:

     General Perspective - Adenosine triphosphate  (ATP) , a high-energy
compound found in every living cell, is constantly re-formed in
metabolism.  It functions in a catalytic capacity acting as a  link
between reactions that serve as a source of energy for  the organisms
and those that lead to biosynthesis and growth.  Therefore, as a
catalyst it is conserved throughout the entire metabolic process and
is a relatively constant constituent of the cell     .  Fermentation,
respiration and photosynthesis are the three major processes used by
cells to extract energy from the environment and make ATP.  The
netabolically available energy of ATP lies in the chemical hydrol-
ysis of the a, 3, and y_phosphate groups.  The cell  uses ATP to make
otherwise endergonic reactions exergonic

                                    10

-------
                                                       NH,
           9*    90    9r
       HO— P~O— P~O-P-O— CH
           o-
O"
                                    OH    OH
                            Adenosine Triphosphate
     There are also some specialized energy liberating reactions, such as
"firefly luminescence" that require ATP.   Many comprehensive accounts
on the various fundamental aspects and reaction mechanisms of bio-
                                                       (18—26)
luminescence and chemiluminescence have been published.
     Development of Analytical Methods - This literature survey will con-
centrate on the application of the luciferin-luciferase bioluminescence
system in adenosine triphosphate measurement.

                      (27 28)
     McElroy and Green   *    pioneered the discovery of the absolute and
integral requirement of ATP for Photinus pyralis (firefly) bioluminescence
and used purified luciferin and crystalline firefly luciferase to characterize
the light emission reaction as being associated with the utilization of both
luciferin and ATP.
                                     11

-------
      Lucifer-Luciferase Reaction

                         MR++
           LH2 + ATP + E . *  *.  (E - LH2 - AMP)  + PP

           (E - LH2 - AMP)  + 02—» (E - L - 0 )  + Products

           (E - L - 0*)-» (E -  L  - 0~) + hv
      E = enzyme luciferase
      LH2 = reduced luciferin
      ATP = adenosine triphosphate
        11
      Mg   = magnesium ion
      E - LH_ - AMP = luciferyl-adenylate complex
      PP.  = phosphate inorganic
      0» = molecular oxygen
      hv - photon or quantum of light
      E - L - 0  = oxyluciferyl-adenylate complex,  excited  state

      The  number of light quanta  emitted was determined  to  be  directly  pro-
 portional to the initial ATP concentration of  the  reaction system.  The
 reaction  of  ATP with luciferin lead  to the formation  of pyrophosphate
 and active luciferin.   The latter compound could react  with either
 oxygen for light production or be hydrolyzed to luciferin  and adenylie
 acid  (AMP) under anaerobic conditions.   Moreover,  the luminescent
 reaction was inhibited  by  the  end product  of the reaction.  Pyro-
 phosphate  liberated  the enzyme from  this inhibitory complex but at
                                               (29)
 the same  time  counteracted the activation  step     .   It was noted that
 the light  producing  step was not  the  rate-limiting step; luciferin
 had to  react with ATP before it  could be oxidized with  light  production;
 LH--AMP was  shown to be the active intermediate and ATP did not act
                                                      (20  30)
 as an energy donor  in the  luciferin-luciferase  system.   '

     Considerable  research has been performed on developing adenosine  tri-
phosphate analysis based upon  the  firefly  luminescence  system.  Attention
has been focused  upon improving  the methodology of this very  complex bio-
chemical system  in the varied  biological systems studied.

                                     12

-------
     The basic methodology is initially concerned with complete extraction
of the ATP in the sample and this primary extraction has been performed
both on the reaction mixture as a whole and upon cells washed and filtered
from the growth media.  Extraction has been achieved with dilute perchloric
acid       ,  boiling HO, tris (hydro xymethyl) aminomethane (Tris) or N-tris
(hydroxymethyl) Methyl-2-aminoethane sulfonic acid (TES) ^ 5~37) trichloro-
acetic acid (TCAK   ,  or dilute sulfuric acid    ».  Most recent studies
have shown that in aqueous systems, the ATP of bacterial cells was
quantitatively extracted with boiling (100°C) Tris buffer at pH 7.75^35'    .
    (31)
Cole     found chilling and anaerobiosis of growing cells of E. coli
before extraction with perchloric acid caused a reduction in the ATP
                       (41)
pool.  However, Knowles     refuted this in a study of Azobacter vinelandii
where harvested, washed, and starved cells had aerobic ATP levels similar
to cells taken directly from the culture medium.  In general, the efficiency
of ATP production was low in disrupted cells  (lysis, ultrasonic rupture,
or Parr bomb) compared to ATP production measurements or unbroken cell
            (31,32,41)
suspensions .
     Preparation of the lucifer-Lucif erase system also has differed greatly.
Lypholyzed and dessicated firefly lantern extracts should be reconstituted
in a magnesium arsenate buffer which will both control the ionic strength
              ( 38)
of the medium     and provide the magnesium ions essential as a catalyst
in the initiating step of the luciferin-luciferase bioluminescence
        (18)
reaction    .  In addition, when ATP and firefly lantern extract  (FLE)
are combined in the presence of an arsenate buffer, an intermediate level
of light emission occurs which decays steadily and exponentailly with
     (19)
time    .  Some authors have preferred to use purified luciferin when
analyzing submicro quantities of ATP, since in the crude, commercially
available firefly extracts residual ATP and other high energy phosphate
                       I whi(
                        (28)
         (42)
compounds     are found which interfere with and obscure the analysis
of submicro quantities.
                       (28)
     McElroy and Green      observed  that  the  light  emission was  modified
                                                          (38)
by the  ionic strength of  the  reaction medium,  and Aledortv     evaluated
the optional ionic  requirements  for  firefly bioluminescence.  It was
concluded  that  light emission mediated  by firefly luciferin-luciferase
and ATP was inhibited by  increasing  the ionic  strength of the  reaction
                                     13

-------
medium.   The inhibition of firefly luciferase by ions was shown to follow
                                                                       +
 certain trends,  i.e.,  cationic inhibition occurred when Ca
                                             occurr*
                                             - (38)
                                                                    Na
Rb  > Li  > Choline  and anionic inhibition occurred when I
 Br  >  C103 >  Cl  >  Fl
HC0
                                COOCH
                  HO
                                    /    \
                                                       COOH
                   Firefly D(-) Luclferin
                   (Active Form)
                                     (23)
      Some researchers have preferred  to  reconstitute the crude firefly
lantern extract  (FLE) and incubate  it at 0-4°C  from 6 to 72 hours  to
deplete the endogeneous luminescence  associated with the residual
                                    (31 35-38  44)
adenosine triphosphate found  in FLEV   '      '    .   Others have used
a method of luciferin-luciferase enzyme  dilution to reduce the enzyme
                                                            (29)
blank due to endogeneous ATP  and ATP-AMP phosphotransferaseN
Incubating the enzyme with apyrase  to eliminate endogeneous ATP and
                                    (42)
lower the blank has also been used       and numerous authors have
observed that the enzymatic activity  and luciferin  content of crude
firefly lantern extract varied from batch to  batch  thereby requiring
                                            (27)
determination of background emission  levels     » or variation of
the quantity of enzyme preparation  used  in the  reaction  mixture to
                                            (44)
yield a constant for a known  amount of ATP.
     Instrumental analysis of the photon emission by  the  firefly  assay
also has been subject to a great variety of investigations.   Historically,
                                     14

-------
the recording D.C.1P121 photoraultiplier tube was first used to quantify
the light which was followed by a Farrand photomultiplier and the liquid
nitrogen quantum counter; the ultimate sensitivity reached with these
                                  -9         (19 40 45)
instruments was in the order of 10   g ATP/ml   '  '   .   However, the
liquid scintillation spectrometer was quickly adopted to provide sensiti-
vities to 10    mole ATP/ml^  '.  Many difficulties have been
encountered in standardizing the methodology using this instrument
due to the variabilities noted between models and type of liquid
scintillation counters (LSC).  Therefore, each investigator has had
                                                                  (29 31
to adopt his particular LSC to the particular research application    '  '
   '      .  Such problems as whether or not to use the "in-coincidence"
or "out-coincidence" mode are still a matter of controversy as is the
voltage to be applied    '   '   .  When using either a photomultiplier
tube system or a liquid scintillation counter method, a standardized
procedure for constant sample injection or timed reaction counting
has become vital since the kinetics of the light reaction are rapid
                                                                  (49)
and subject to logarithmic decay.  Many researchers have developed
unique apparatus to accomodate these variables    '   '    and to achieve
                                                         (33)
quick sampling and injection into the reaction mixtures.
     Instrument companies such as Du Pont and American Instrument Com-
pany have already recently developed luminescence "biometers" based
upon the luciferin-luciferase system to quantify ATP as a biomass para-
meter        .  Defresne and Gitelman     developed another system
employing a standard Technicon Auto-Analyzer with a Packard flow
detector which in turn was  connected to a Pachard Tri Garb 314F to
circumvent the problems  of  uniform sampling and constant timing,
     App1ication and Regult s - Because the amount of endogenous ATP  and
the ability  of the organisms to  further synthesize ATP were important
to bacterial survival, Strange     investigated  the  effects of
starvation on Aerobacter aerogenes.  When washed  endogenous phase
organisms  (10  ) were  starved, the viability remained high  (100-98%)
for at  least 40 hours.   Although ATP was required and  formed  during
this period  of metabolism of reserves, the rate  of  formation  of ATP
decreased as the reserves declined during prolonged  starvation.   The
content of freshly gathered and  washed bacteria varied with  oxygen

                                     15

-------
 tension and solute concentration of the suspending solution; both
 anaerobic conditions and high solute concentration markedly reduced
 the amount of ATP extracted.   The synthesis of ATP which occurred when
 bacteria were transferred from anaerobic to aerobic conditions or
 from a solution of high to one of low solute concentration was
 extremely rapid.   Although no direct relationship seemed to exist
 between ATP concentration and the viability of survival propects  of
 this bacterial population, evidence suggested that the ability of
 bacteria to synthesize  ATP in the absence of exogenous nutrient was
 related to survival.  Starvation progressively reduced the magnitude
 of  the increase in ATP  which  occurred when bacteria were transferred
                                      (34)
 from anaerobic to aerobic conditions.

             (39 40)
      Forrest   '     studied the  ATP pool in Streptoccoccus faecalis, an
 organism with a comparatively simple anaerobic metabolism.   It appeared
 that a critical concentration of ATP was necessary for exponential ("log")
 growth to occur and  at  levels lower than this critical concentration,
 only linear growth occurred.   The pool level of ATP of an organism
 was defined as the balance between the demands of the  organism for the
 energy and the supply of  energy  derived from the  catabolism of the
           (39)
 substrate.    '

      Holm-Hansen  and Hamilton   '     used ATP content  data of  the endo-
 genous  levels  of  ATP in laboratory cultured marine species to  estimate
 the active biomass in ocean samples.   The ATP levels found  at  various
 depths  of  the  ocean indicated an oceanographic bacterial population
 of  50-2000 times  greater  than estimated  by standard plate culturing
 techniques.   Studying seven marine bacterial strains grown in  a
 chemostat,  the  ATP content  per viable  cell count  (standard  plate
 count) was  always high  during a  period  of  log growth and began to
decline during  the early  endogenous  phase of growth.   After  a  short
endogenous  phase, all cultures studied  showed a marked period  during
which the  viable  cell count decreased  drastically while the  ATP
                                                   (36)
content in  the  cells decreased to  a plateau level.
                                   16

-------
     Cole     examined the ATP pool in batch cultures of Escherichia
coli since this organism could grow on complex or minimal media both
anaerobically and aerobically with a variety of energy sources.  The
measurement of the ATP pool level throughout growth and starvation
would indicate the extent of ATP control by the organism.  The rate
of ATP production was in balance with the rate of growth both aero-
                                            -9
bically and anaerobically.  The ATP pool (10   moles ATP/mg dry
weight of cells) remained fairly constant during "log" growth.
     ATP metabolism in a strict anaerobe, Methanobacterium strain M.O.H.
was investigated and the results of growth yield studies indicated
that the ATP conservation was very inefficient (0.06 moles ATP/mole
                                                                    (33)
hydrogen) under conditions used to grow the bacterium in a fermentor    .
In whole cell studies of this organism, ATP formation was decreased
and AMP formation increased in the presence of air, chloroform, 2,
4-dinitrophenol, carbonylcyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone and penta-
chlorophenol.  It was suggested that these substrates were either
inhibitors of electron transport or uncouplers of an energy-linked
process.  The compunds also inhibited methane formation in cell-free
extracts, an ATP-requiring process.
                                                  (41)
     Using obllgately aerobic Azobacter vinelandii     which possessed a
very active respiratory chain system and no fermentation ATP synthesis,
aerobic ATP pool levels were always high and about the same level with
endogenous substrates and on anaerobiosis the ATP level fell to a quarter
of the aerobic ATP pool level.  D'Eustachio and Levin     reported the
level of endogeneous ATP in bacteria to be relatively constant for several
species and all phases of growth.  Examining thirteen species of aerobic
gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria with the aid of a "Biometer",
a  mean ATP content 4.7 x 10    yg/cell was determined.  Microbial growth
was related to the amount of ATP present and/or produced by metabolism of
nutrient energy sources.  A study of three taxonomically different organ-
isms  (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Bacillus  subtilis)
during all growth phases yielded a relatively constant  level of based
ATP at 1.45 x 10~   yg/cell     which may have been  low because of  sample
pretreatment by sonic cell rupture     .  This steady-state level  of
endogenous ATP suggested that a relatively constant  level of  cellular ATP
                                    17

-------
was maintained to  provide sufficient energy for maintenance for vital
enzyme  systems during all growth phases.   A linear correlation between
plate count  and ATP  content  was obtained.
         (53)
     Kao     ,  et al.  reported  that  the  rate of  ATP increase was closely
related to the rate  of growth  through lag  and  log phases.   However,  con-
trary to  other reports,  oscillatory variations  were followed as the
stationary phase began in pure culture  studies  with E.  coli and
P. aeruginosa.   A  concentration of  2 yg ATP per ml of MLSS  was found most
effective for  the  waste  water  having 240 mg BOD,./! in a field study  by
             f C J \
Biospherics.       Excessive  ATP was removed from the aeration basins by
lowering  sludge return rates and still  maintaining the  same efficiency
of treatment.

               (37)
     Patterson    and co-workers developed a method for ATP analysis in
activated sludge samples with  relative  standard deviations  for replicate
samples of less than  two percent and ATP recovery in "spiked" samples
of 98-100 percent.  Results  indicated the  use of the ATP pool (endogeneous
level of  ATP in the system)  as  an indicator in  activated sludge toxicity
studies.  The  maximum ATP pool  measured, approximately  2 pg ATP/ing of mixed
liquor  suspended solids  (MLVSS)  was typical of  endogenous ATP concentration
in activated sludge batch units.  The maximum ATP pool  occurred at pH
7.5 to  8.0 which represented normal operating conditions and was greatly
reduced at low  (3.0)  or  high (11.0) pH  conditions.   The effect of various
concentrations  of mercuric chloride on  ATP levels in activated sludge
after one hour  incubation indicated a rapid drop in ATP pool at low
  I [
Hg   levels, a  more gradual  decrease at intermediate concentrations
                                                    I j
and increased rate of  pool reduction above 10 mg Hg /liter of sludge.
In studying the  firefly  bioluminescence analysis of ATP for toxic effects,
it was  concluded that  any substance which  inhibited luciferase activity
would reduce light emission  and  yield false ATP results.  The presence
of mercuric ions reduced the luciferase activity and consequently also
the light emission which effect  had to be  compensated for by filtration
or dilution of  the sample containing heavy metals.   Using an endogen-
ous ATP pool value of  2  ug/ml  cell  material, the pattern of the ATP
pool  response to changes in  metabolic activity  of an activated sludge

                                      18

-------
culture was determined.  The results indicated a slow drop in ATP
pool during a 24-hour period prior to feeding with a subsequent constant
level being attained in the unfed sample during the next 24 hours as
                                       (34)
also observed by Strange and co-workers    .   The immediate response in
the fed sample was a slight drop in ATP, followed by a rapid and significant
increase.  The ATP pool was affected by the metabolic activity of an
activated sludge culture and responded rapidly to an increase in substrate
loading while being only gradually reduced as the organisms entered an endogen-
ous phase.  The study confirmed previously published reports of a relatively
constant ATP pool under endogenous conditions although the pool in activated
sludge was significantly lower (0.8 ug ATP/mg of volatile suspended solids)
than reported for pure culture experiments (2yg per mg dry cell material).
This lower ATP pool in MLVSS indicated that only a fraction of the total
activated sludge solids was viable cell material.  ATP was a specific
indicator of cell viability since ATP content completely disappeared
within 2 hours of cell death.    '
     Many applications of the luciferin-luciferase bioluminescence system
have been developed.  For example, the differential determination of ATP
and ADP in the presence of each  other is possible through the use of
myokinase, phosphocreatine may be determined by the use of transphosphori-
fase and AMP, and glucose can be determined by the use of hexokinase
                                                    (19)
and ATP by measuring the depression in luminescence     .  Therefore, any
component in a system which can  be made to influence the level of ATP can
be studied by this method.
     A method for the estimation of ADP in ethanolic extracts of plasma
was developed based upon the conversion of ATP with a pyruvate-kinase
                                                       (43)
system and subsequent assay of the ATP with FLE method     .  Studies
have been conducted on membrane  adenosine  triphosphotase and active
transport     , the production of adenosine triphosphate in normal cells
                                             (45)
and sporulation mutants of Bacillus subtills     and using ATP levels
in food  to indicate bacterial contamination     .
     While the FLE bioluminescence method has an absolute requirement
                                                                   (21)
for ATP  to initiate the reaction, many other bacterial  luciferases
catalyze  the bioluminescent oxidations of reduced flavin mononucleotides
in the presence of long chained  aldehydes.  A bioluminescent method,

                                     19

-------
                    NADH + FMN + H+  dehydrogenase^   _>
                                                             z
                       ,__.,.  ,  f,  	  luciferase          ,
                       FMNH- +0- 	>   hv
                                   long chained aldehyde

 therefore, has been developed to directly measure the NADH oxidation
 in the reductive amination of a-ketoglutaric acid with NH_     by means
 of a liquid scintillation counter and method of Stanley     in cell-
 free extracts of Nitrosomonas europaea.
      Brolin     has further developed a photokinetic micro assay based
 on bacterial luciferases to include many compounds which are either
 convertible in dehydrogenase reactions or compounds which are involved
 in reactions leading to a dehydrogenase  step because they can be
 followed by quantitating the bioluminescence produced.  The bacterial
 luciferase may be coupled to enzyme utilizing or producing FMN or NADH
 to produce dynamic measurements in situ  or the system may be used for
 measuring compounds which are conjugate  in their action with NADH    .

 Dehydrogenase Activity Methodology and Application;

      General Perspective - Attempts have been made to improve the method-
 ology for analysing dehydrogenase enzyme activity so that it can be
 applied  as a parameter indicative of active biomass.  Various dehydro-
 genase enzymes  or oxidoreductases are the key enzymes which catalyze
                                             (4)
 the  redox reactions of biological metabolism   .   These enzymes  catalyze
 the  oxidation of  organic substrate by the removal of hydrogen atoms.
 Every dehydrogenation  must be  coupled with a hydrogenation;  the  hydrogen
 atoms removed from the substrate must be added to some other compound.
 Many  of  the  dehydrogenases have associated coenzymes which serve as
 temporary acceptors of the substrate hydrogen in  the electron transport
 system.   Two  compounds which frequently  serve in  this capacity are  the
 pyridine  nucleotides,  nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (DPN)  and
 nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (TPN  )
      In the simplest type  of enzyme  catalyzed oxidation reaction, only one
electron  carrier  is  interposed  between the  substrate  molecule  and molecular

                                      20

-------
oxygen.  In these dehydrogenase reactions the electron carrier is coupled
to the oxygen and no other substances.  However, the dehydrogenase enzyme
can pass electrons to certain reducible dye-stuffs such as tetrazolium
salts(1).
     Development of Analytical Methods  - Lenhard and Nourse   '  '
developed a test to measure dehydrogenase activity and applied this
method to soils, benthal deposits, activated sludge systems, and anaerobic
waste treatment systems.  During the aerobic biological treament of organic
wastes, organic carbon is oxidized to CO  with a concomitant reduction
of 02 to H20.  A tetrazolium salt such as 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium
chloride (TTC) can be employed as the hydrogen acceptor during this
dehydrogenase-catalyzed oxidation reaction.  The hydrogen released during
the reaction is attached to the salt yielding the highly red-colored
redcued compound, triphenyltetraformazan (TF) which is easily extracted
into alcohol and measured spectrophotometrically according to Beer's
Law.   (See Figure 3)
     Lenhard and Nourse   '    also investigated the effects of pH, tempera-
ture and reaction time during analysis.  The optimum pH was 8.4 for samples
obtained from anaerobic and aerobic systems; strongly alkaline pH values
resulted in possible tetraformazan production.  The optimum temperature
for the incubation of the tetrazolium chloride with activated sludge and
anerobic digestion samples was 37°C.  Batch studies indicated an increase
in dehydrogenase activity within one hour after substrate addition and
continuous culture (extended aeration) studies indicated that the dehydro-
genase test offered the possibility of measuring the availability of
endogenous substrates by comparing the reduction of TTC with and with-
out added glucose.  In the absence of glucose, low values of dehydrogenase
activity would indicate a low concentration of endogenous metabolites
available for oxidation.  Without siginficant modification of the analysis,
the dehydrogenase activity in anaerobic samples was tested both in the
presence of air and in vacuo; the in yacuo  test results were slightly
higher but the difference was not considered significant enough to warrant
the further complication of the method.  The rapidity of the dehydrogenase
test  (1 hour), allowed  for the detection of impending process difficul-
ties before any change in the quality of effluent could be measured.
                                     21

-------
                     Organic

                     Material
                                    — 2H
                     Oxidized  Organic

                     Material
                                              ADP P.      ATP
              NAD H2      FADH




                    -2H|f+2H     -2H




               NAD         FAD
                                                                       2,3,5 Triphenyl

                                                                       Tetroformozan

                                                                         ( RED)
                iCyeto ] crom
                                                                               l/2 0,
                                                                 Electron Transport

                                                                    System
                                           +• Microorgonismus

                                           4-Dehydrogenaseenzymes

                                           4-2,3,5, Triphenyltetroiolium  Chloride

                                             ( Colorless )
 2CH3— CH  —  C — OH


          OH
Dehydrogenose   ^   2 CH,-C — C—OH -I-  2H
   •   *	
     Substrate
                                Enzyme
                      Oxidized  Substrate
2H
)— C
                   \
                       —N-(O/
      CL
                                                                   ,N	NH
HCL +  (0)-c
                                    \
         2,3,5 Triphenyltetrazolium

              Chloride (Colorless)
                      2,3,5  Triphenyltefraformozan (Red)
 Figure  3.   Transfer  Mechanisms of Intermediate Substrate Metabolism
                                        22

-------
     Bucksteeg     expanded Lenhard^ work to include the evaluation of a
prototype activated sludge plant and improved the methodology to include
the exclusion of light during the incubation period which he extended
to one hour to eliminate the photochemical effect.  These investigations
indicated that the overall activity of dehydrogenases in a wastewater
and activated sludge mixture increased with increasing concentrations of
the dry mass of sludge, whereas the biochemical efficiency of the sludge
relative to unit weight of dry mass decreased.

     Ford    further investigated the dehydrogenase activity reaction
time for samples obtained from a contact stabilization process and
determined that the production of tetrafortnazan declined rapidly after
60 minutes and was a direct function fo sludge age.  The TTC-measured
dehydrogenase activity responded to significant changes in plant loading.
Jones     examined the effect of extended aeration on the dehydrogenase
activity.  Oxygen was demonstrated to be a competitive inhibitor in
TTC—»TF reduction.  The reaction reached the same level of reduction
aerobically as it did anaerobically but it took longer to attain that
level  (characteristic of competitive inhibition).  It was concluded
that the dehydrogenase test more accurately measured the total biological
activity of an anerobic system since molecular oxygen acted as an inhibitor
and competed with TTC as a terminal hydrogen receptor.

                    (ft? "i
     Shih and Stack     used the dehydrogenase test to explore the
temperature effects on energy-oxygen requirements in an aerobic biological
oxidation process.  Energy-oxygen was defined as the net consumption of
oxygen in support of synthesis reactions.  The methodology was refined
during the studies to  include the extraction and concentration of TF
with 1-butanol because all the TF produced  (including that associated
with the solids) was concentrated in the limited butanol system.  To
preclude a possible TF production interference by dissolved oxygen,  it
was removed with sodium sulfite prior to the addition of TTC.  The  energy-
oxygen coefficient developed during the studies varied with substrate
oxidized and  temperature conditions.
                                      23

-------
            (f T \
     Marlar     noted the inhibitory effect of oxygen on the dehydrogenase
test and by scrubbing the samples with nitrogen, increased the color
intensities and the reproducibility of the reduced and extracted TF.
Ghosh     included initial cell disruption and a one-hour sample incubation
at 37°C with TTC under a nitrogen atmosphere to eliminate the effects of
dissolved oxygen and microbial growth during the test period.  The dehydro-
genase activity was proportional to the solids concentration and the con-
stant of proportionality was independent of growth rates for a given micro-
bial population and substrate composition.

     Dean and Rodgers     investigated the steady-state levels of dehydro-
genases of Aerobacter aerogenes in a variety of nutrient-limiting chemostats
at various dilution rates between 0.1 and 1.0 hr  .  These dehydrogenase
activities were determined by the TTC reduction method and it was shown
that the dehydrogenase activities were generally higher when sugars provided
the carbon for growth than in other nutrient-limiting conditions.  Randall^  '
investigated the use of dehydrogenase activity as a predictive parameter
for activated sludge drainability.  Results indicated that a dehydrogenase
activity to solids ratio of less than 0.6 ymoles per gram of solids was
assurance of good sludge drainability.
                                     24

-------
                                  SECTION IV

                                 INTRODUCTION

     This research was initiated to define the applicability and limitations
of the dehydrogenase test for the measurement of active biomass content of
biological sludges used in the treatment of domestic and industrial waste-
waters.  During the studies reported herein, experimental apparatus were
constructed, analytical techniques established, and pure and heterogeneous
batch culture and continuous culture studies with and without sludge re-
cycling were conducted.

Experimental Apparatus;

     Pure Culture Studies - In this phase of the experimental studies a
pure culture of £_._ coli was grown in a minimal substrate  (Table 1).  The
ractor system was designed to permit aseptic techniques and to eliminate
possible external contamination.  To accomodate this requirement,  three
double sidearm, water-jacketed one-liter Spinner flasks were arranged
as shown in Figure 4.  Both sidearms of each flask were sealed with
serum stoppers and hypodermic needles were passed through them to  allow
for both gaseous interchange and for feeding and sampling.  The compressed
air used for aeration  was filtered  through a Gelman filter holder  contain-
ing a 0.45u, 25 mm diameter filter  paper prior  to its  introduction and
diffusion into the culture medium.
     Inside the flask  reservoir, a  glass air diffuser  was attached with
tygon tubing to the needle extending through the serum stopper to  provide
for aeration below the substrate level in  the  reactor.  An air outlet
port was provided by attaching a cotton-plugged syringe barrel to  a
hypodermic needle inserted through  the stopper  next to the air inlet.
The sampling port consisted of a similar arrangement  including a  length
of tygon tubing attached  to the needle and  extending well below  the
surface of  the substrate  in the reactor.   The  cotton  filled  syringe
could be removed  aseptically  from  the needle and  either  a filled  or  an
empty  sterile  syringe  could be  attached  for feeding or sampling  res-
pectively.
                                      25

-------
                                            TABLE 1
                             Minimal  Substrate*  for  Batch  Cultures
Nutrients
(NH4)2S04
Substrate
MgCl2'H2O
CaCl3'2H2O
FeCl3«6H2O
KH2P04
Na2HPO4
Concentration of
Stock Solutions
18.857 g/1
As selected
32 g/1
400 mg/1
400 mg/1
5.4436 g/1 (0.04M)
5.6784 g/1 (0.04M)
Volume of Stock
Solution Used
in the Reactor
As selected
As selected
5 ml
5 ml
5 ml

Final Concentration
in the Reactor
to maintain
C:N of 20:1
160 mg/1
2 mg/1
2 mg/1
Use equimolar vol-
umes of both and
bring final volume
up 1 liter, which
yields :
pH=6.88 and 0.08M
POj concentration
ro
         * Minimal Substrate:   a simple synthetic medium consisting of ammonium salts,
           phosphates,  sulfates, and other mineral salts with the addition of organic
           compound as  a  source of carbon and energy.

-------
                                AIR LINE
                               COTTON FILTER
                               AIR OUTLET


'•;".;- •."•:• "M


;;
f
\
WATER BATH
  RESERVOIR
PUMP
                 Figure h.  Reactor  Assembly for Pure Culture Studies

-------
      A magnetic stirrer was placed beneath each reactor to provide internal
 mixing by rotation of the magnetic impeller inside the flasks.   A piece
 of asbestos was placed between each reactor and the stirring apparatus
 to control heat transfer.  The temperature in the reactors was  maintained
 at 37°C by circulating water from a water bath through the water Jackets
 surrounding each culture flask.
      Prior to each experiement,  one liter of substrate was measured into
 the reactor flask and sealed with a dome-shaped top containing  an inner
 sleeve to align the impeller assembly in the center of the substrate
 reservoir.  The top was secured  by a heavy wire flange clamp arid the
 complete assembly was then autoclaved at 15 psi and 120°C  for 15 minutes.

      Heterogeneous Culture Studies - The 10-liter volume reactor unit  is
 schematically shown in Figure  5.   The essential elements are the reactor
 in which biological growth occurs, a mixing motor and  propeller, an
 air diffuser  located  in the bottom of the reactor,  a variable speed
 influent pump,  and an electronic  level  controller.   Compressed  air was
 supplied throughout the aerobic batch and continuous culture studies.
 The air supply was regulated by Air Flowmeter (SHO-Rate, Model  1355,
 Brooks Instrument  Div.,  Emerson Electric Co.).

      During the batch culture  studies,  nutrient media  similar to that
 used  during the pure  culture studies  were seeded and pumped into the
 reactor  followed by a predetermined amount of selected substrate.
 The mixing  units consisted of  a B & B Motor (1725 rpm,  115  V, 1/8  HP,
 NSH 54  type)  and controller (B &  B Motor and  Control Corp.,  N.Y.,  N.Y.)
 and provided  complete mixing along with air diffusion.  The reactor
 temperature was maintained at  20°C during these studies.

      In  the continuous  culture study, both nutrient  media  and substrate
were  stored in  a reservoir and pumped into the  reactor at  a selected
flow  rate  to  give  a desired  retention time.   During  the anaerobic
digestion   study,  however,  the air supply line  was sealed  off and  the
level controller was  employed  to  regulate the reactor  volume.   An
effluent pump  (Model  7015,  Master  Flex  Pump,  500 rpm,  115  V.  Cole-

                                    28

-------
                                                        MOTOR CONTROLLER
VO
                                    LEVEL
                                  CONTROLLER
                                                                                TEMPERATURE CONTROL
                 CULTURE
                 MEM
                                Figure 5-  Reactor Assembly  for Heterogeneous  Culture  Studies With
                                            Solids Recycle

-------
 Farmer Instrument Co., Chicago, 111.) was connected to the effluent
 line and either activated or deactivated by the level controller as
 soon as the reactor contents went above or fell below the 10-liter
 mark, respectively.  A temperature of 37°C was maintained by exterior
 heating tape and a heating element inside the reactor controlled by
 a temperature controller.  During the sludge recycle studies, a
 2.7-liter clarifier and recycle pump (115 V, 7.5 rpm.  Gorman-Rupp
 Corp., Bellville, Ohio) were connected to the reactor system as shown
 on Figure 5.  The biological seed was obtained from the activated sludge
 process and anaerobic digester of the South River Water Pollution Control
 Plant in Atlanta, Georgia for the aerobic and anaerobic studies res-
 pectively.

 Pure Culture Preparation;

      The test organism for the pure  culture studies,  E.  coli was cultured
 ,for 18 hours on a nutrient agar slant and then washed from the slant with
 three separate applications of distilled water, concentrating the cells
 by centrifugation after washing.   The washed cells were  resuspended in
 sterile water and a known volume  of  E.  coli suspension was used to
 innoculate  each reactor.   Nutrient agar plates were also streaked at
 this time to determine the absence of contaimlnation.
      In some of the batches,  growth  and substrate were monitored from
 the  time of initial innoculation  whereas in other cases,  the population
 was  allowed to acclimate  to the substrate over night  (about  16 hours)
 after which time  additional substrate was added.   The  analyses were
 then  followed  from the beginning  of  substrate  removal  thereby avoiding
 the  lag period observed when  the  population was  first  acclimating to
 the culture  medium.   In either  case,  log growth was easily observed.

Analytical  Techniques;

     Each batch conducted  during  this phase was monitored  by  standard
plate counts,  Coulter  Counter enumeration,  substrate removal,  total
suspended solids determination, dehydrogenase activity and, on  occa-

                                     30

-------
 sion,  adenosine  triphosphate  (ATP)  content.  The  analytical  deter-
minations required a minimum sample volume of 30 ml and at least 30
minutes between samplings.  The various tests could be performed con-
currently and some samples could be stored and frozen for later
analysis.  When substrate volumes were reduced below 400 ml by samp-
ling, the culture medium was diluted back to one liter by addition
of sterile phosphate buffer solution.  Usually one day was required
to prepare and sterilize the reactors, innoculate and grown the cul-
tures, and to prepare the necessary reagents and sampling vials
before a batch study could be initiated.
     Coliform Analysis - The Millipore Filter plate count technique
for the analysis of coliform as described in Standard Methods for  the
Examination of Water and Wastewater  (Standard Methods)     was employed
in these investigations for E. coli.  A 1.0 ml sample of the proper
dilution was filtered and rinsed through a stainless steel Hydrosol
filter holder and the bacteria were retained on a 0.45y pore size, 47 mm
diameter, sterile Millipore filter.  The filter was then placed onto a
sterile pad soaked in 2 ml of MF Endo Broth in a  sterile petri-dish,
inverted and incubated at 37°C for  18 to 24 hours.  The coliform analysis
was initiated as soon after the sample was drawn  in order to prevent
growth or culture attenuation.  The  filter holder was maintained in
a sterile condition by exposure to  ultraviolet light for at  least  one
                              /go\
minute before each filtration     .   Results were  generally available
within 24 hours  of sampling.
      Solids Determination - Total  suspended  solids were determined gravi-
metrically on 0.45y, white grid,  47 mm Millipore  filters.  The  filters
were  Individually washed with distilled water under vacum for approxi-
mately two minutes in order to remove  the  glycerine and wetting agent
and  to insure a  constant  tare weight.  Each  filter was numbered, dried
 for  30 minutes at 103°C and desiccated for at least 30 minutes  before
weighing.  Filters were also  stored in the desiccator  prior  to  use.
      An  exact volume of sample was  vacum  filtered through the Millipore
 filter and the filtered solids  (cells) were  dried with the  filter  at
 103°C for  30 minutes, desiccated  for at least 30  minutes, and  then
weighed.   The tare weight was  subtracted  from the final weight  obtained

-------
 and  the  difference was mutiplied by the volume factor of that sample
 thereby  giving the results in mg/1.   The samples were analyzed for solids
 shortly  after removal  from the reactors to prevent settling,  clumping a*nd
 possible changes  in bacterial populations.  The very low populations
 (approximately 10  organisms/ml) and the limited sample volume (10-20 ml)
 characteristic of the  pure culture batch studies required considerable
 care in  analysis  since samples often yielded less than a 10 mg weight
 change.   Later solids  analyses were improved (Batches 7-10) by using a
 double filter-tare method  (Appendix A).
      Determination of  Substrate Concentrations - Various methods  of
 substrate determination were  employed depending upon substrate and
 technique available.   Glucose and galactose concentrations were
 monitored by  "Glucostat      and "Galactostat       assay techniques
 which measured the substrate  concentration spectrophotometrically.
 Standard glucose  or galactose solutions of known concentrations were
 determined with each set of samples  analyzed in order to circumvent
 the  problem that  slight changes in the incubation times of the sample
 with the test  reagent  produced variations  in color intensities even
 with identical glucose or  galactose  concentrations.   In addition,
 all  samples were  filtered  through a  glass  fiber filter  to rid them
 of bacterial  solids which  would otherwise  assimilate glucose  or
 galactose during  the test  period and also  contribute turbidity inter-
 ferences  during absorbance measurements.   The  glucose samples were
 incubated with the  test reagents for 30 minutes and  the color developed
 was  stable for at  least 12 hours thereby permitting  delayed Beckman
 DU analysis.   The  galactose samples  required much more  care in analysis
 since the  color development during the incubation period frequently
was poor  and unstable  so that  samples  could  not be stored more than
 3 hours.
      Chemical  oxygen demand (COD)  determinations provided a measure of
 the oxygen equivalent  of that  portion  of organic matter in the sample
 subject  to oxidation.   In  monitoring sucrose in pure culture  studies
with  E^  coli,  the  COD  assay was employed according to Standard Methods.
All samples were  filtered  through  glass  fiber  filters to rid  them  of
bacterial  solids which were also susceptible to  strong  oxidation.

                                     32

-------
The samples were refluxed with known, amounts of potassium dichromate
and sulfuric acid, and the excess dichromate was titrated with ferrous
ammonium sulfate.  The amount of oxidizable organic matter measured
as oxygen equivalent was proportional to the potassium dichromate
consumed.
     The Beckman Total Carbon Analyzer was used to monitor the acetic
acid and L-alanine substrates in pure culture studies  (Batches 8 and 10).
All samples were filtered through Millipore filters  (0.45 u) and preserved
with HC1 to prevent further growth before analysis.  When the sample was
injected into the Total Carbon Analyzer, it was completely combusted to  CXL
and the CO  was  analyzed in the instrument by infrared  spectroscopy.
Appropriate standards were analyzed and treated in the  same manner for
calibration purposes.
     Gas-liquid  chromatography was also employed  to  follow the acetic
acid uptake  (pure culture Batches 8 and 9).  A model 700 F&M  gas
chromatograph with hydrogen flame ionization detector  and six feet,
1/8 inch-diameter stainless steel columns packed  with  20% carbowax
4000 and TPA on  60 to 80 mesh WAWDMCA  (high performance chromosorb
W, acid washed,  silanized) was used.  All samples were filtered
through Millipre filters  (0.45 y) and preserved with HC1  to prevent
further growth.   Retention time was  five minutes  using this column
packing with excellent  resolution.
     L-alanine  in Batch 10 was monitored on both  the Beckman  Total  Carbon
Analyzer and the Technicon Auto  Analyzer for ammonia and  total  nitrogen.
Based  upon the  calculated value  of  the  total nitrogen available in the
standard solution of  pure L-alanine  (1200  mg L-alanine or 192 mg nitrogen),
the results obtained  from the Auto  Analyzer indicated that  apporximately
one-half  (100 mg) of  the total nitrogen content of L-alanine  was available
as ammonia. The possible explanations  for this inconsistency were (1)
 the amino  group of L-alanine  was hydroloyzed upon standing in aqueous
 solution,  (2)  the pure  L-alanine crystals  were contaminated with ammonia
 salts, or  (3)  the amino group was cleaved  from L-alanine when coming
 into  contact with the strong digestion mixture (H^SO,, HC10,, and catalyst)
 used  in the auto-analysis procedure.
                                     33

-------
      Coulter Counter Analysis - A methodology for employing the Coulter
 Counter  for correlation of bacterial populations with plate counts was
 developed in accordance with the experiences  of Swanton    .   By diluting
 a known  volume  of  sample in Isoton (particle-free saline),  the bacterial
 population at the  time  of sampling was  fixed  thereby allowing delayed
 analysis.  A 1.0 ml  sample was most frequently used to provide an adequate
 counting range;  however, on occasion,  the sample required further dilution
 when the organism  concentration exceeded 10  organisms per  ml.
      To  eliminate  the interference of very high background  noise,  a metal
 wire mesh "cage" was positioned around  the sampling namometer and aperture
 tube stand of the  counter.   The instrument was calibrated with 3.49 u
 diameter latex  spheres  and windowed to  count  all particles  between 3-5 u
 diameter.  A 50  u  aperture tube was employed  and a 0.05 ml  sample aliquot
 was counted. To obtain a recordable population count, each sample was
 counted  five times,  the total count averaged,  corrected for background
 and coincidence, and multiplied by the  appropriate dilution factor. In
 later batches (7-10), a multiplication  factor of 100 was used for data
 interpretation.

      Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)  Analysis -  The first method employed for
                                                              (37)
 ATP analysis was patterned  after the work of  Patterson e_t al_.       This
 method entailed  the  preparation of a luciferin-luciferase enzyme reagent
 and ATP  standard solutions,  ATP extraction from the samples,  and determina-
 tion of  ATP  content  in  the  samples by counting the light emissions with a
 Packard  Tri  Carb Liquid Scintillation Counter (Model 3320).
     The  luciferin-luciferase  enzyme preparation required dissolving one
vial of  Sigma desiccated  firefly tails  in 37.5 ml of deionized distilled
water and allowing it to  stand  at  room  temperature for one  hour.   The
solution was  then  filtered  through a Watman #3 filter and then allowed
to incubate  in an  ice bath  for  24  hours.   The  ATP standards were pre-
pared in  0.025 M tris buffer  to desired  concentrations.
     For  sample analysis,  2.0  ml of sample were transferred  to 50 ml
NPN  tubes containing approximately 40 ml of boiling tris buffer (0.025 M,
pH 7.75)  and held  in boiling water for  10 minutes with occasional  shaking
                                    34

-------
to kill the bacterial population and extract the ATP quantitatively.
The tubes were then rapidly colled and brought to volume with additional
tris buffer.  For an immediate assay, the tube was then placed in an ice
bath; for later analysis, the samples were frozen at -20°C.
     The scintillation counter was set with a gain at 100 percent amplifi-
cation, a window setting of 50-1000 on the "Red Channel", and the coin-
cidence mode was switched to off.  Counts were taken for 0.1 min (6.0
seconds) and background from the luciferin-luciferase preparation was
measured prior to each analysis.  Samples were inserted into the counter
by transferring 1.5 ml of enzyme preparation into a scintillation vial
followed by 0.5 ml of ATP sample (or standard) and mixing.  Since the
luminescence decayed exponentially with time, the interval between addi-
tion of the ATP to the enzyme preparation and the initiation of the
counting sequence was carefully controlled.  The data was analyzed
graphically due to the random variability of 6-second counts, extrapolating
the line of best fit back to one minute since exponential decay commonly
began one minute after the reaction was initiated.  The graphical tech-
nique provided linear standard curves for a wide range of ATP concentrations,
Attempts to apply this methodology to pure culture batch studies during
the investigations have proven inconclusive and have further emphasized
the sensitive nature of the  analytical  procedures particularly where
relatively low biomass concentrations were developed.  This sensitivity
can be ascribed to the necessity of control of physical parameters during
analysis.  For example, the temperature at which ATP extraction from the
cells takes place has been found to be very critical and a few degrees of
temperature fluctuation will greatly change the ATP yield    '    .  More-
over, the pH and the volume of both the sample being extracted and the
sample aliquot being measured in the liquid scintillation  counter are
very critical     .  Exact and consistent  timing of all steps in the pro-
                    (29)
cedure is essential
     Considerable difficulty has been experienced in standardizing these
variables and generating reliable and reproducible data.  Adaptation of
the liquid scintillation counter became questionable primarily because of
the relatively low organism populations and the necessity  for switching
                                     35

-------
 the counter out of coincidence mode of scaling due to the danger of
 "stripping" the photomultiplier tubes when high intensity light is emitted.
 The possibility of reducing the light intensity through both enzyme
 dilution and aging, and decreasing the volume of sample aliquot being
 counted were investigated without success.  As a consequence, this
 method was abandoned at this point.
      The second method employed for ATP analysis was as proposed by
 McElroy, e_t al^. (  '  This method entailed the preparation of a luciferin-
 luciferase enzyme reagent and ATP content photometrically through con-
 version of the light intensity and its proportional transfer to a digital
 readout unit.   The instrument was calibrated for each reaction mixture so
 that the ATP concentration was read directly.  The luciferin-luciferase
 enzyme was supplied with a buffer salt in tablet form.   After dissolving
 one tablet of  buffer salt in 3.0 ml of ATP-free Low Response Water (acid-
 ified, boiled,  neutralized to pH 7 with NaOH and autoclaved  distilled
 water), one vial of enzyme substrate was added and 0.1  ml transferred
 into each reaction cuvette with an automatic pipettor.
      In preparing the  ATP standard,  100 ml of fresh 0.01 M morpholinopropane
 sulfonic acid  (MOPS) buffer and 100 mg of crystalline adenosine-51  -
 triphosphate-disodium  salt were mixed to make a stock solution.   From this
 solution,  serial 1:100 or 10:100 dulutions with 0.01 M  MOPS  were made until
                                                        o
 the final  ATP  concentration was 0.1 ug ATP/ml or 1 x 10  fg  (femtogram)
 ATP/ml.   This  final solution was dispensed in about 0.5 ml aliquots into
 clean  cuvettes,  capped,  frozen and stored.   The frozen  standard  was thawed,
 brought  to  room temperature and injected into the  reaction mixture  when
 the  samples were  ready for analysis.
     The ATP extraction method  for the  samples  by  Dimethysulfoxide  (DMSO)
preceded by freezing and  thawing was  chosen as  recommended by  DuPont.
The  extraction procedure  is included  in  Appendix B.   A  comparison of
the  ATP extraction  method  by DMSO  and by nitrogen  bombing was  also
accomplished in an  attempt  to  shorten and  simplify sample preparation
as indicated in Table  2 and Figure 6  for data obtained  from  selected
batch and continuous culture studies.   In the nitrogen  bombing method,
the  samples were  treated  in a  Parr Bomb  by  exposing at  30 atmospheric
                                     36

-------
                              TABLE 2
Comparison of ATP Contents Extracted by DMSO and by Nitrogen Bombing
                                                           unit: fg/ml
DMSO
6.78 x 107
8.56 x 107
,1.46 x 108
8.23 x 107
1.03 x Id7
1.9. x 107
1.31 x 107
3.46 x 107
1.56 x 107
1.27 x 107
9.60 x 106
8.46 x 106
8.52 x 106
9.48 x 106
7.26 x 106
7.56 x 106
Bombing
1.81 x 107
2.10 x 107
3.09 x 107
1.47 x 107
3.84 x 106
5.67 x 106
4.47 x 106
1.50 x 106
1.03 x 106
7.10 x 105 ,
1.22 x 106 i
1.64 x 106
5.03 x 105 :
1.13 x 106 1
6.29 x 105
8.56 x 106
Sources
Aerobic/
continuous
Cultures grown on
i
glucose.
n n
n n
tf it
M ii
Anaerobic batch
cultures grown on
leachate.
n n
n n
ii n
ii n
n n
n ii
DMSO
5.60 x 107
3.60 x 107
8.82 x 106
5.22 x 107
3.80 x 107
9.20 x 106
3.60 x 107
2.60 x 107
4.80 x 107
1.70 x 107
1.55 x 107
1.93 x 107
2.33 x 108
1.36 x 108
8.94 x 107
2.94 x 107
Bombing
1.25 x 107
3.75 x 106
2.14 x 105
2.78 x 106
5.41 x 106
8.20 x 106
1.00 x 107
4.10 x 106
7.40 x 106
5.13 x 106
2.02 x 106
2.80 x 106
7.17 x 107
3.63 x 107
2.96 x 107
4.61 x 106
Sources
Aerobic continuous cultures
Grown on chicken processing
wastes.
n n
n ii
Aerobic continuous cultures
grown on fish processing
wastes.
ii n
n ii
Aerobic batch cultures
grown on acetic acid.
n ii
n n
n n
n n

-------
   *'
   10'
E
a>
  108
 w
JO
i
a   7
510
   10
    6
                                                    Itttii ;
                                                      •  Aerobic continyoui  "itk  (lucose
                                                      Q  Unatrobit   bitch  ititk  Itackate
                                                      A  Aerobic continuous   witk  ckickti  wastes
                                                      a  (erobic continwis   witk  fisk   waste
                                                      O  Aerobic batch   *ith  acttic  acid
                                          /
                                        /
                                          £
                                       0


                                                  i?            i?"
                                 ATP by DMSO.fg/ml
      Figure 6.   Comparison of  ATP  Contents  Extracted by DMSO and by
                    Nitrogen Bombing
                                           38

-------
pressure under nitrogen and stored in the freezer until ready for
Biometer analysis.
     As shown in Figure 6, there was no definite numerical relationship
observed between the amount of ATP extracted by DMSO and by nitrogen
bombing, even though general similarity was shown over the indicated
ranges of concentrations.  The nitrogen bombing technique did not
show as much reliability or reproducibility as the DMSO extraction
method.  The amounts of ATP extracted by DMSO preceded by freezing
(Table 3) yielded the highest values, while those by nitrogen bombing
with freezing resulted in increased concentrations but much lower than
those observed by DMSO extraction.  As a consequence, the DMSO extrac-
tion method was employed for the ATP analysis throughout present studies,
However, the continuous culture studies indicated definite relation-
ships between the two methods in certain retention time ranges; i.e.,
ATP concentration by bombing vs. by DMSO was close to 90 percent at
20 hours and 30 percent near 12 hours or shorter retention times.
Under consistent operation schemes as those used during activated
sludge treatment or other biological processes in the field,  this
relationship would possibly be  constant and the bombing method could
therefore give satisfactory results.  This consistency is demonstrated
on Figure 6 where the higher magnitude correlations were obtained at
longer retention  times" for the  continuous culture study with  glucose.
Additional effort must be directed toward definition and/or develop-
ment of  a possible correlation  between the  two methods of ATP extrac-
tion of  samples from aerobic and  anaerobic processes during the  sub-
sequent  field  studies.
     Dehydrogenase Analysis - Numerous investigators have attempted
to develop a  standardized method  for  the measurement of dehydrogenase
as an  indication  of active biomass.   Most work has been performed
with heterogeneous continuous culture studies or  pilot plant  studies
of activated  sludge systems.  However, these  studies were  limited
to systems with high microbial  populations  as stimulated by  non-
limiting substrate levels.  The study reported herein  emphasized
application with  pure  and heterogeneous  cultures with  various selected
substrates.
                                   39

-------
                             TABLE 3
Effects of Freezing and Nitrogen Bombing on ATP Contents Extracted

Before Freezing
After Freezing
After Refreezing
Nitrogen
Bombing
fg/ml
1.18 x 106
1.07 x 106
1.82 x 107
2.03 x 107
DMSO
Extraction
fg/ml
1.06 x 108
1.14 x 108
1.23 x 108
8.90 x 107

-------
     The method adopted for these investigations was proposed by Ghosh
and included initial cell disruption and incubation of the sample with
2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride under a nitrogen atmosphere to
eliminate the effects of dissolved oxygen and microbial growth during
the test period.  The inhibitory effect of oxygen on this method was
                                              tf o\
first observed in these laboratories by Marlar    , when nitrogen was
bubbled through the test samples, the color intensities of the
tetraformazan became highly reproducible.  The apparatus used in these
investigations is illustrated in Figure 7 and the analytical method
is detailed in Appendix C.

     To properly interpret the results with respect to dehydrogenase
activity, it was necessary to be able to express a relationship between
dehydrogenase activity and biomass concentration which would permit
direct conversion of the analyses for dehydrogenase activity obtained
during these studies to an expression of active biomass.   Since the
pure culture studies of this phase of the investigation  utilized  sub-
                                           ((."}}
strates similar to  those reported by Ghosh     ,  the empirical  equation
developed by this author was also employed in  these studies  in accor-
dance with  the  following:

     X  = 4.4 + 536 A	(1)

where:
          X =  biomass  concentration, mg/1
          A =  dehydrogenase  activity

     Equation  1 was developed  by multiple  regression analysis of  data from
a series  of soluble substrate  studies  utilizing glucose and galactose in
which  the biomass  concentration was plotted against the dehydrogenase
activity  as absorbance at 1.0  cm light path and 483 my wavelength.  These
 data and  the resulting equation of the curve of best fit are shown on
 Figure 8 together  with the data obtained for substrates used during
 these  studies.
                                    41

-------
        SCREW COMPRESSOR   MANIFOLD
             CLAMP
                                                  FLOWMETER
NITROGEN
                NPti DIGESTION TUBE
      37°C  WATER BATH
Figure 7-  Apparatus for the Dehydrogenase  Test

-------
                                                                   0
                                             x = 4.4 4- 536 A
                                        Ltgtnd:  A Goloeto« ( Ghosh)
                                                 O Glucose (Ghosh)
                                                 Q Glucose (This Study)
                                                    Galoctose (This Study )
                                                    Acelic Acid (This Study)
         400        600        1200        1600       2000       2400
 D«hydrofltnost   Activity   (Abserbonc*   CP ' *"•  Light Path , A )« I04
Figure 8.  Correlation Between Dehydrogenase Activity and Biomass
            Concentrations
                               43

-------
     One of the difficulties experienced with the dehydrogenase measure-
ment was that when the samples were homogenized in Waring Blender, little
color was developed and large analystical variations existed between
duplicate sampels.  Moreover, since the untreated samples had more
color than the homogenized samples, the use of the blender was dis-
                                          (72)
continued and a cell disruption technique     was
this variance and insure consistency of analysis.
                                         (72)
continued and a cell disruption technique     was developed to eliminate
     In this method, the samples were treated in a Parr Bomb by exposure
at 30 atmosphers of nitrogen.  Better color development was experienced
than with the untreated or homogenized samples and little significant
deviation was noted for duplicate samples,  Moreover, as indicated
in Table 4, there was good correlation between the dehydrogenase
activity of samples analyzed immediately after distintegration in
the Parr Bomb and those frozen after treatment in the Bomb and
analyzed after thawing.  This latter observations permitted storage
of samples for subsequent analysis in number.
                                   44

-------
                                TABLE  4
   Comparison of Sample Pretreatment Method  for Dehydrogenase Analysis
Sample
Number
1A
IB
1C
2A
2B
2C
2D
2E
2F
3
4
5
6
7
Untreated
Sample
A W
0.1805
0.2381
0.1221
0.0883
0.1261
0.0841
0.1013
0.1255
0.0783





X (mg/1)
99. 9 w
135.2
66.3
51.2
72.5
48.9
57.5
71.9
44.6





Homogenized
Sample
A
0.0339
0.0283
0.0232











X
20.9
17.7
14.9











Disintegrated
Sample
A



0.2050
0.1760
0.1690
0.1840
0.1800
0.1640
0.0306
0.0381
0.2299
0.0391
0.1319
X



116.7
100.5
96.6
104.9
102.5
94.9
18.9
23.2
130.4
23.8
75.2
(c)
Disintegrated &
Frozen Sample
A









0.0320
0.0357
0.2182
0.0320
0.1249
X









19.8
21.9
124.1
19.8
71.9
(a)   Homogenized in Waring Blender at 15,000 rpm
(b)   Cell disruption by Parr Bomb
(c)   Analyzed after thawing
(d)   Optical density
(e)   Dehydrogenase activity calculated from the empirical equation.

-------
                                  SECTION V

                   PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

 Batch Studies with E. coll:
      A representative sample of the data obtained during the various
 batches utilizing glucose and galactose innoculated with E.  coli are
 included in Table 5 through Table 15 and on Figure 9 through Figure 19.
 Each of these tables and figures indicate changes in substrate con-
 centration, Coulter Counter enumeration, plate counts,  suspended solids
 concentration and dehydrogenase activity as expressed by the empirical
 relationship or Equation 1 and Figure 8.

      Various trends were established as the culture progressed through lag,
 log growth and eventually endogenous phase after  the substrate was nearly
 depleted.   Dehydrogenase activity was first observed at  a limiting popula-
 tion of approximately 10  organisms/ml and increased during  log growth.
 A similar  behavior  was  observed for  the solids analysis  except, whereas
 the solids concentration reached a limiting value for any one batch and
 then leveled off  for  an extended period of time,  dehydrogenase activity
 declined immediately  after the  substrate had been essentiallt depleted.
 The plate  count and Coulter Counter  data also  followed dehydrogenase
 activity during log growth but  plate counts decreased during the endogen-
 ous phase  whereas the Coulter Counter enumeration remained more constant.
 Not  until  the batch studies  had been extended  for a considerable period
 beyond  the  time of  depletion of the  substrate  did the counts and suspended
 solids  concentrations begin to  decrease.   The  refined analytical technique
 showed  these trends more  clearly in  the later  batches.   (Appendix A)

     The data in the  tables  and figures  indicated that dehydrogenase
activity as  defined was  a  more  sensitive  indicator  of the activity of
the biomass with respect  to  its response  to  the growth limiting sub-
strate during exponential  growth as  well  as  when  the  substrate  had

-------
reached a limiting concentration.  During exponential growth, the
plate count, Coulter Counter, suspended solids and dehydrogenase
activity indicated similar trends.   This similarity between parameters
is illustrated on Table 26 which also suggested a change in ratio be-
tween suspended solids and dehydrogenase activity as the carbon source
changed.
                                     47

-------
                                                 TABLE 5




                                  Pure  Culture  Batch No. 1 With Glucose
Time,
hour
0
1.75
2.16
2.50
2.75
67.00
117.0
157.00
Substrate,
mg/1
230.0
154.0
127.0
124.0
113.0
-
_
-
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mq/1
-
38.0
-
54.0
61.0
21.0
18.3
18.7
Suspended
Solids, mq/1
-
130
-
140
180
-
-
220
Plate Counts
cells/ml
1.2 x 106
1.5 x 107
-
1.1 x 107
1.8 x 107
1.3 x 107
-
2.0 x 103
Coulter Counter
cells, ml
1.3 x 107
1.5 x 107
-
2.1 x 107
2.2 x 107
4.3 x 107
-
7.1 x 106
oo

-------
                                                 TABLE 6
                                   Pure Culture Batch No.  2 With Glucose
Time,
hour
0
1.75
2.16
2.50
2.75
67.00
117.00
157.00
Substrate,
mg/1
420.0
324.0
—
222.0
214.0
-
-
-
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
_
38.0
85.0
123.0
121.0
31.0
21.6
21.0
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
_
160
180
190
_
-
—
220
Plate Counts
Cells/ml
1.2 x 106
1.5 x 107
1.6 x 107
1.6 x 107
2.3 x 107
1.28x 107
-
1.7 x 105
Coulter Counter
cells/ml
1.9 x 107
2.2 x 107
2.4 x 107
2.1 x 107
3.0 x 107
-
-
1.03 x 107
VO

-------
               TABLE 7
Pure Culture Batch No. 3 With Glucose
Time,
hour
0
3.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
7.50
12.50
21.00
21.75
23.25
24.50
26.25
29.00
30.00
49.50
75.00
107.00
Substrate,
mg/1
1,475.0
1,125.0
1,150.0
1,092.0
948.0
782.0
312.0
253.0
188.0
145.0
143.0
110.5
64.4
33.5
_
_
-
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
18.9
23.2
52.7
130.4
-
156.0
-
-
65.1
60.5
52.2
-
25.4
-
-
-
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
_
-
30
55
125
-
-
-
-
230
180
220
140
-
85
80
190
Plate Counts
cells/ml
1.42 x 107
1.20 x 107
8.0 x 106
2.0 x 107
4.0 x 107
-
-
-
-
2.2 x 108
2.4 x 108
1.8 x 108
4.0 x 108
6.6 x 107
3.0 x 107
3.0 x 107
3.4 x 105
Coulter Counter
cells/ml
1.9 x 106
2.0 x 106
2.3 x 106
7.8 x 106
4.4 x 107
-
-
-
-
1.2 x 107
1.1 x 107
8.4 x 106
1.4 x 107
5.2 x 106
6.4 x 106
4.3 x 106
8.7 x 106
                 50

-------
                TABLE 8
Pure Culture Batch No. 4 With Galactose
Time,
hour
0
1.50
2.50
5.00
7.00
14.50
30.50
55.00
76.00
100.50
146.25
Substrate,
mg/1
583.0
335.0
-
238.0
231.0
116.0
-
-
-
—
-
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
-
36.0
46.0
69.3
-
48.9
42.0
37.7
24.6
-
Suspended
Solids , mg/1
165
-
180
210
-
-
200
170
280
230
270
Plate Counts
cells/ml
1.76 x 108
2.18 x 108
2.71 x 108
2.64 x 108
2.83 x 108
-
3.60 x 108
-
7.4 x 108
1.5 x 108
-
Coulter Counter
cells/ml
3.4 x 106
3.2 x 106
3.8 x 106
5.7 x 106
6.9 x 106
-
9.4 x 106
8.2 x 106
1.7 x 107
2.9 x 106
3.8 x 107

-------
                                             TABLE 9
                             Pure Culture Batch No. 5 With  Galactose
Ul
to
Time,
hour
0.25
3.25
5.00
6.50
12.50
31.00
52.50
77.50
132.25
Substrate,
mg/1
924.0
752.0
731.0
565.0
94.8
52.7
-
-
-
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
86.7
150.3
101.9
109.0
86.3
53.0
69.1
41.1
-
Suspended
Solids, rag/1
320
270
340
-
298
-
390
557
530
Plate Counts
cells/ml
5.0 x 107
3.3 x 108
5.2 x 108
6.9 x 108
-
2.1 x 109
6.9 x 108
5.3 x 108
2.3 x 105
Coulter Counter
cells/ml
7.4 x 106
1.0 x 107
1.23 x 107
1.20 x 107
-
1.60 x 108
3.40 x 107
3.2 x 107
-

-------
                                           TABLE  10
                           Pure Culture Batch No.  6 With Galactose
Time,
hour
0.25
3.25
5.00
6.50
12.50
31.00
52.50
77.50
126.00
Substrate,
mg/1
1,240.0
803.0
348.0
93.2
42.6
-
-
-
-
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
231.9
233.4
121.1
125.3
75.2
113.4
117.7
105.4
24.0
Suspended
Solids , mg/1
430
490
530
500
567
510
580
600
430
Plate Counts
cells/ml
5.7 x 108
9.2 x 108
6.0 x 108
1.0 x 109
-
1.7 x 109
5.5 x 108
7.1 x 108
5.6 x 105
Coulter Counter
cells/ml
2.6 x 107
3.2 x 107
2.6 x 107
4.1 x 107
-
6.7 x 107
7.4 x 107
9.2 x 107
-
LO

-------
                                                 TABLE 11
                                   Pure Culture  Batch  No.  7  With Sucrose
Ui
Time,
hour
0
1.50
2.50
3.50
4.50
6.00
7.00
25.00
29.00
35.50
47.00
Sucrose,*
mg/1
2,170
2,170
2,210
1,990
1,935
1,692
1,620
1,325
-
884
847
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
12.1
19.6
26.1
131.4
91.6
61.6
43.5
-
41.5
52.6
Suspended'
Solids, mg/1
-
—
—
—
150
130
130
-
400
-
660
Plate Counts
cells/ml
1.5 x 106
3.8 x 106
7.5 x 106
4.0 x 107
4.6 x 107
9.1 x 108
9.3 x 108
7.5 x 109
9.4 x 10°
-
-
Coulter Counter
cells/ml
4.6 x 107
1.1 x 107
3.4 x 107
-
3.5 x 109
6.1 x 109
7.1 x 109
1.5 x 1010
1.7 x 1010
-
2.0 x 1010
                     * measured by  Chemical Oxygen Demand (Standard Methods)

-------
                                                     TABLE 12
                                    Pure Culture  Batch No.  8 With Acetic Acid
Time,
hour
0
0.50
1.50
3.00
4.25
6.00
7.00
24.50
29.00
Substrate , mg/1
Acetic Acid
1,254
_
1,134
-
—
826
774
—
60
Total Organic
Carbon
553
_
517.4
-
—
430
384.6
—
103.8
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
84.1
77.4
-
-
159.9
165.5
224.4
87.9
-
Suspended
Solids , mg/1
120
130
170
-
190
340
350
320
-
Plate Counts
cell/ml
4.2 x 108
6.9 x 108
7.6 x 108
9.7 x 108

9.6 x 108
1.0 x 108

9.8 x 108
Coulter Counter
cell/ml
2.6 x 108
4.4 x 108
8.4 x 108
1.2 x 109

1.7 x 109
2.3 x 109

4.7 x 109
(Jl

-------
                TABLE 13
Pure Culture Batch No. 9 With Acetic Acid
Time,
hour
0
2
3
5
6
7.5
14.75
24.0
26.0
29.0
48.0
55.0
79.0
Acetic Acid,
mg/1
2,250
2,100
2,222
2,100
2,100
2,100
—
1,080
1,020
640
380
-
—
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
11.0
14.9
21.0
38.3
60.6
238.6
507.6
446.0
527.0
856.0
514.0
28.6
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
33.3
53.2
59.8
54.4
90.0
190.0
330.0
380.0
470.0
500.0
720.0
-
560.0
Plate Counts
cell/ml
6.7 x 107
1.1 x 108
1.3 x 108
1.2 x 108
3.4 x 108
6.2 x 10 8
-
1.5 x 109
2.6 x 109
2.2 x 109
1.5 x 109
-
—
Coulter Counter
cell /ml
4.9 x 107
8.1 x 107
9.5 x 107
1.8 x 108
4.6 x 108
7.1 x 108
-
6.2 x 109
5.4 x 109
4.6 x 109
5.3 x 109
-
—

-------
                TABLE 14
Pure Culture Batch No. 10 With L-Alanine
Time,
hour
0
1.0
2.0
4.50
6.00
24.50
29.50
L-Alanine
Total Organic
Carbon , mg/1
441.6
420
378
330
288
129.6
100.5
Organic
Nitrogen, mg/1
82
76
70
51
-
-
-
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
177.6
225.4
179.0
172.8
260.9
149.5
-
Suspended
Solids , mg/1
230
340
360
290
370
390
-
Plate Count
cell/ml
6.7 X 108
7.8 X 108
1.3 X 109
2.1 X 109
3.9 X 109
2.2 X 109
3.5 X 109
Coulter Count
cell/ml
6.8 X 108
8.4 X 108
1.1 X 109
1.8 X 109
1.8 X 109
3.5 X 109


-------
                                            TABLE  15
                          Pure Culture Batch No.  11 With  Benzole  Acid
Ln
OO
Time,
Hour
0
0.75
2.50
3.25
4.50
6.00
11.00
29.00
52.00
75.75
95.75
166.00
Dehydrogenase,
Activity, mg/1
81.4
70.8
138.6
151.9
130.7
100.6
125.6
154.4
182.0
111.4
98.1
7.8
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
280
260
320
400
320
360
580
— _
620
620
600
	
Plate Counts
Cell/ml
4.9 X 108
5.8 X 108
3.0 X 108
8.0 X 108
1.2 X 109
6 X 108
	
2.5 X 109
1.3 X 109
6.7 X 108
1.6 X 108
	
Coulter Counter
counts/ml
1.2 X 109
7.9 X 108
8.4 X 108
8.8 X 108
9.3 X 108
9.7 X 108
	
_ —
__-
	
	
	

-------
VO
•JO
no
CM
MC
|«0
^•00
^ IM
s
"5. **°
? "°
0
•8 too
=5

•o «o
4O


- 700
i
— toe
- soa
^
- r
3
. 0
- BDC
• B0(
•
• K»


p
r^" ^^^-\
"•x
\s
	 \ 	 	
.-•••" ^
y
Legwd : A Plaf« Count \
« 	 • \
• \
Q • Coulter Counter Enumeration \
k •
O Suspended SoHdt ^ ^
t
O Dehydrogenase Activity
S • Subttrate
/ %'% ° *^
i i i '»*fj i i i i i i i i > i i i i i i i i
t 4 • t 0 tt M • •tOttM'r4«nMaOM4WMlM
Time In hours
Figure 9- Pure Culture Batch No. 1 With E. Coli and Glucose
H*
O
c
2
•
K>T "
o
i
I0«
10*



                                         Substrate

-------
ON
O
                                                                                                                       - K>5  3
                                                                        Plate Count


                                                                        Coulter  Counter Enumeration
                                                                        Suspended Solids


                                                                        Dehydroqenose Activity


                                                                        Substrate
                                                                  Time  in hours


                                   Figure 10.   Pure  Culture Batch  No.  2 With IS.  Coli  and  Glucose
                                                  Substrate

-------
   SOOT    BOOl-
 _ z«o


 o>

 E zeo




 ~ 200
 31
 o>
 o
I

•o
o
   ISO -
   ao
(n
   4O
   to
                                                                                                          -iio"
                                                         Time  in hours



                           Figure 11.   Pure Culture Batch No.  3 With  E_.  Coli and Glucose

                                         Substrate

-------
            300 -
            no -
                                                                                                                           o

                                                                                                                           ?
                                                   Legend
a.
ro
             MO
                    TOO •
           1
           J5
A



Q




O



o
Plate  Count



Coulter Counter Enumeration



Suspended  Solids



Dehydrogenase  Activity



Substrate
                                                                                                                       -1(0°
                                                               Time in hours




                               Figure 12,   Pure Culture Batch No.  ^ With IS.  Coli and Galactose

                                             Substrate

-------
 4O r-
  SB
  500
r
- •»!
  •»<>
 100
  so
     - too

                o
                                            Legend
     - MO
                                                      A    Rote Count


                                                      •    Coulter Counter Enumeration


                                                      O    Suspended Solids


                                                      O    Dehydrogenose Activity


                                                      •    Substrate
                                                                                                                10 •
                                                                         M    u    10
                                                                                   i  A i	|	|	f
                                                                                   M  f~HnM   ieo
                                               Time in hours
                       Figure  13.  Pure Culture  Batch No.  5  With  E_. Coli and  Galactose
                                     Substrate

-------
         MOO -
0>

E
  000-
  400-
2
ft)
o>
o
•o

o



c
0>
a
en
  100
                                           Legend ;
          too
          too
                              '•••III
                                                                            Lnsr.«rr.*ifv.viF&:m'
A     Plate  Count



a     Coulter Counter Enumeration



^    Suspended Solids



O    Dehydrogenose  Activity



o     Substrate
                                      W
                                                M     W    18    20    22

                                                       Time in hours
                                                                          a4
                                                                                          S>
                       Figure Ik.   Pure Culture Batch No. 6  With

                                      Substrate
                                                                               Coli and Galactose
                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                              \
                                                                                                                   BO

-------
Ui
2400—
40C
E
o
>hydrogenase
w
o
•o
c
0
•V IOO
0
(A
ipended
w
•3
CO
2200
ZOOC
1 BOC
1600
QI400
O
O
JJI200
. -1000
9
i
u>
400
2OO
O
^- — •- -" 	 "n 	 A~~
\ ,Va'I> --*' 	 "**" 0-
/V x- •*"*'" 	 Legend: O
.' ••&& ..."" A
/ r\ ...•-" a
' I / % ,-•* o
/ ' X'"
— • — 	 -o_

Oehydrogenase Activity
Plate Count
Coulter Counter Enumeration
Total Suspended Solids
Substrate
/A/A X COD"'""..,,.
" V / 	 *. ,... -
"X /
f\
1 \


tMMf**! 1 1 1 | | 1 | | | | J | | 1
2 4 6 • IO 12 14 16 IB 2O 22 24 26 2S 3O
Time in hours

Id
Counts, cells/ml.
-o "o
.0'
,oT
•o6


O
""• '
i i i A i
32 34 36 V4i



Figure 15- Pure Culture Batch No. 7 With E. Coli and Sucrose
                                    Substrate

-------
                                                                                                    10
                                                                                                  -i 10
        • 300
  500
   100
•o

V
                                                                                                   ,o
                                                                                                   ,o
 o
 o



 o>




'"I
  01
                                                                                                  JlO
                                             14    16    IB

                                             Time in hours
                    Figure 16.   Pure  Culture Batch Ifo.  8 With T&.  Coli  and Acetic

                                 Acid  Substrate

-------
                                                                                                                                 IO
                                                                                                                                10
          MOO
  900
•>
i»

g
* 80C
          ««00 .
          I4OO .
  600
•o
^500
3
V)
          ieoo .
        E  1200
  401 _ £   800
  "C_    400
  100
                                                                                      fl
                                                                                                           «...
                                                                      Legend •.
O Dehydrogenose Activity

A Plot*  Count

Q Coulter Counter  Enumeration

<^ Total  Suspended  Solids

O Substrate
                                                    14    16    18

                                                    Time in hours
                                                                    20   22    24    26   28    SO    32
                      I A    I     I

                      2  V 4872
                                                                                                                                10
                                                                                                                                10
                                                                                                                                10
                                                                                                                                10
                                                                                                                 72     96    120
                                                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                                                      •
                           Figure  17-    Pure Culture No.  9 With  E.  Coli  and Acetic Acid
                                           Substrate

-------
                   500,
           500
         o
         <
         0300 _
00
          Jzoc
         MIOO
                   400
                                                                                                                    -i SO
Legend:     O Dehydrogenose  Activity
           A Plate  Count
           Q Coulter  Counter Enumeration
            :> Total  Suspended  Solids
              Substrate
           "A" Organic Nitrogen
                                                                   16     IB    20    22    24    26    28    SO
                                                   lime  in hours
                                                                                                                              10
                                                                                                                                10
                                                                                                                              10
                                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                                • o
                                                                                                                              10
                                Figure 18.   Pure  Culture Batch  No.  10 With E.  Coli and L-Alanine
                                               Substrate

-------
           700r
VD
                                                      © Dehydrogenase
                                                        Rate Count
                                                      o Coulter Counter Enumeration
                                                        Total Suspended Solids
                                                                                                                  K)
                      10
                                                                                                                 10* O
                                                                                                                   .
                                                                                                                 10  5T

                                                                                                                10
                                            24   28   32   36
                                                 Time in Hours
76   92    96   106
                           Figure  19.   Pure  Culture Batch No. 11  With E_.  Coli and Benzole
                                        Acid  Substrate

-------
Batch -rtj^jgs with  Heterogeneous  Cultures;
     Seven  batch studies with heterogeneous  aerobic  cultures were  conducted
with glucose,  galactose, sucrose, acetic  acid,  and L-alanine substrates.
The data in Table 16-22 and Figures  20-26 indicated  that  dehydrogenase
activity was a  very sensitive indicator of the  activity of  the biomass.
With  the addition of ATP analysis, Figures 25 and 26 indicated the same
pattern between dehydrogenase activity and ATP  concentrations throughout
 the growth  phase.  A comparison at ATP content  extracted  by dimethyl
 sulfoxide (DMSO) solvent and nitrogen bombing was also included  in
 Figures 25  and  26.   A parallel relationship  between  the extraction
 technique was  reflected by curves.  During exponential growth, suspended
 solids  and  dehydrogenase activity maintained a  similar trend as  observed
 in the  pure culture studies as shown in Table 26.

      In addition to the aerobic studies,  an  anaerobic digester was
maintained  to demonstrate the possible applicability of the dehydrogenase
 test in such a  process.   The digester had been  fed with leachate from
a solid waste disposal site once  a day and with initial COD concentrations
of 350,550, and 800 mg/1.

     The data from  three batch studies are included  in Figures 27,28  and
29 and  Tables 23,24,  and 25.   Leachate concentrations, biomass by  all
parameters  and  gas  (carbon dioxide and methane) production  were  measured.
It was  during these batch studies that the sensitivity of the dehydrogenase
test became more pronounced when  compared with  other parameters.   The
total suspended solids with both  non-volatile and volatile  fractions
including biomass did not  reflect changes interpretable in  terms of
activities  of organisms  in the system.  The  magnitude of  increase  in
solids  concentration after 8-10 hours was much  less  than  observed  in
aerobic  systems.

     ATP  concentrations were monitored in two of these batch studies  and
showed a  rapid  decrease instead of an increase  in the first six  hours
followed  by a slight increase (Figures 24 and 25).   Similar observations
on ATP were  reported by Forrest(39)  during the  growth of  the anaerobic,

                                       70

-------
Streptococcus faecalis, on a pyruvate substrate.  Apparently, during
the first several hours of the experiment after growth began, synthesis
reactions made heavy demands on the ATP pool causing a rapid decrease in
the pool level.  It appeared then to fall below the critical level
necessary to sustain exponential growth.  Consequently linear growth took
place, limited by the availability of ATP for synthesis.

     Contrary to these observations on ATP content or solids concentrations,
the dehydrogenase activity in the studies reported herein was consistently
sensitive to the behavior of the active biomass during the growth cycle
under anaerobic conditions.  As the substrate was depleted and the
corresponding gas production rate decreased, the dehydrogenase activity
also decreased to a minimum value.
                                     71

-------
K3
                                             TABLE 16
                         Heterogeneous  Culture Batch No. 1 With Glucose
Time/
hour
0
1.50
2.75
5.50
6.25
7.75
24.00
31.00
Glucose/
mg/1
1540
1252
948
153
70.2
8.1
0
0
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity , mg/1
19
24.8
33.2
47.0
60.0
4.14
20.1
16.2
Total Suspended
Solids, mg/1
40
65
90
120
-
150
185
225
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
40
60
75
110
-
110
135
145

-------
                                               TABLE  17

                          Heterogeneous   Culture Batch No. 2 With  Glucose
•vj
CO
Time,
hour
0
1.25
2.75
4.75
6.25
13.25
23.75
28.50
30.00
53.50
72.00
79.00
Glucose,
mg/1
824
739
671
563
429
189
7.2
0
0
0
0
0
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
47.2
89.3
134.4
95.1
96.3
97.4
101.8
102.3
74.3
74.3
31.8
20.4
Total Suspended
Solids, mg/1
65
120
190
215
220
250
-
-
250
220
195
160
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
50
90
140
160
130
175
-
-
170
-
180
145

-------
                     TABLE  18
Heterogeneous   Culture Batch  No.  3  With Galactose
Time,
hour
0
1.0
2.50
4.50
6.25
7.25
8.50
11.50
13.50
24.00
26.75
29.50
32.50
48.00
52.25
Galactose,
mg/1
740
737
751
742
691
534
162
24.8
12.2
7.3
-
-
-
:
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
-
-
19.0
33.0
42.4
91.0
116.2
166.4
85.9
69.8
70.4
-
15.7
12.0
Total Suspended
Solids, mg/1
-
30
25
130
145
230
250
280
290
250
330
190
230
110
110
Volatile Suspended
Solids , mg/1
-
25
15
80
100
190
190
190
225
230
300
180
210
90
90 1

-------
                    TABLE 19



Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 4 With Galactose
Time,
hour
0
1.25
2.75
4.75
6.00
7.00
8.50
12.25
14.50
23.50
26.00
29.50
30.50
48.50
53.50
73.00
77.00
Galactose.
mg/1
942
928
1010
950
842
-
788
763
595
161
-
6.4
-
-
-
-
-
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
-
-
11.6
15.2
32.1
-
130.6
184.4
148.2
131.6
88.8
-
72.6
-
20.8
-
Total Suspended
Solids , mg/1
-
-
15
-
15
-
85
140
155
320
-
320
315
285
265
-
-
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
-
-
5
-
-
-
50
140
185
280
-
305
285
260
-
170
155
                         75

-------
                   TABLE  20



Heterogeneous  Culture Batch No. 5 With Sucrose
Time,
hour
0
1.0
2.0
3.5
5.0
7.0
26.25
29.5
Sucrose fiy
COD, mg/1
2440
2400
2360
2360
—
2280
2020
1940
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
19.3
21.0
23.5
28.1
27.7
112.6
14.4
15.8
Total Suspended
Solids, mg/1
120
115
135
160
170
205
175
230
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
120
100
125
135
165
175
170
200

-------
                     TABLE 21
Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 6 With Acetic Acid
Time,
hour
0
1.75
4.50
6.25
7.50
24.00
25.75
27.75
48.00
Acetic Acid by
Total Organic
Carbon, mg/1
940
-
-
325
308
30
19
18
-
Biomass Concentration By
Dehydrogenase
Activity,
mg/1
_
_
18.0
—
24.8
65.7
34.9
26.1
0
Total
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
_
250
188.5
192.5
225
225
250
300
265
Volatile
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
_
100
115
140
190
205
210
205
145
ATP , f g/ml
DMSO
1.55 X 107
1.93 X 107
1.36 X 107
1.51 X 107
1.92 X 107
2.32 X 108
1.36 X 108
8.86 X 107
2.89 X 107
Bombing
2.02 X 106
2.77 X 106
3.00 X 106
1.39 X 106
3.00 X 106
7.17 X 107
3.63 X 107
2.96 X 107
4.61 X 106

-------
                                                     TABLE 22
                                 Heterogeneous Culture Batch No. 7 With L-Alanine
Time,
hour
0
1.0
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
15.0
25.0
29
L-Alanine by
Total Organic
Carbon, mg/1
420
396
_
288
184
126
_
56
_
27.5
Biomass Concentrations By
Deny dr ogenas e
Activity, mg/1
0
9.8
20.8
66.3
87.3
122.6
130.0
113.6
47.2
19.3
Total Suspended
Solids , mg/1
	
100
90
_
165
180
245
510
500
215
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
_
60
_
_
140
130
265
405
170
110
ATP, fg/ml, by
DMSO
_
2.00 x 108
2.12 x 108
1.56 x 108
2.12 x 108
2.83 x 108
3.35 x 108
6.06 x 108
_
2.09 x 108
Bombing
^
1.26 x 107
1.63 x 107
2.07 x 107
3.79 x 107
3.88 x 107
5.6 x 107
9.92 x 107
2.10 x 107
3.83 x 107
00

-------
   240_





   220





   200


^.

» l«0




^ 160


>

o 140


«

o (20
           220O
           2000 _
           1800 -
 01
 o
c
0
o
V)
    100
    GO
    «O _
5.  20 _
la
3
V)
      _   syi uw .
                                                                          O Dehydrogenose Activity

                                                                             Total  Suspended Solids

                                                                             Volatile  Suspended Solids

                                                                             Substrate
                                                12     14    la

                                                 Time in hours
                         Figure 20.   Heterogenous  Culture Batch  No.  1 With Glucose
                                        Substrate

-------
         Z6O
         Z4O
         220
          200
                  1000
00
o
          180
           WO
          I4C
                  TOO .
V
Oi
o

£  .00
        •o

        o
        o
        V)
        c  Z
        •
        Q.
        «
        3
        CO
                       % •    s
                                                                                     O Dehydroq«nase Activity

                                                                                        Total  Suspended Solids

                                                                                     • Volatile Suspended Solids

                                                                                     O Substrate
                                          10     12    14    16     16    20

                                                       Time in hours
                                                                                   22
24    26    26    3O    32
                                                                                                                           72    06
                                  Figure 21.   Heterogeneous Culture Batch Wo.  2 With Glucose
                                                Substrate

-------
           400     1000
                   9OO _
        £  300
        >»
          200
oo
        o>
        o
•o
o
j»  100
"5
TJ
c
        I
        CO
                                                                               O  Substrate
                                                                   Legend:      O  Dehydrogenose  Activity
                                                                              A  Plate  Count
                                                                               <3>  Total  Suspended Solids
                                                                               •  Volatile Suspended Solids
                   800 .
                   700 _
                   600
                   500 .
          10
          o
                 o
                 &
                   400 .
                   300
                   200 .
                   100 .
                                                  10    12    14     |6    |B    20    22    24   26    26    90    32  « 48   72
                                                        Time  in  hours
                                 Figure 22.   Heterogeneous  Culture Batch  No.  3 Galactose Substrate

-------
          400
        ~ 300
        o
        (A
        O
00
to
7*
£
•
O
        c
        o
        •o
        o
        •a
        «
        •o
          200
          IOO
                 I 200
                 I 100
                 1000 .
                                                                       Legend :
                                                                          O Dehydrogenose  Activity
                                                                          O Total  Suspended Solids
                                                                          • Volatile Suspended  Solids
                                                                             Substrate
                                               10    12    14    16    IB
                                                                                                                                 120
                                                                   Time in hours
                                        Figure  23.   Heterogeneous  Culture Batch No. U  With Galactose
                                                       Substrate

-------
              2500r
oo
           O
           8
              2000-
              15001
                                                                O Dehydrogenase Activity
                                                                • Total Suspended Solids
                                                                •Volatile Suspended  Solids
                                                                a Substrate
                                          10   12   14   16   18    2O    22   24   26   28   30    32
                                              Time in Hours
  400
  300
     CD
     O
     01
     8
- 200^:
                                                                                                             •100
                               Figure  2k.   Heterogeneous Culture Batch  No. 5 With  Sucrose
                                            Substrate

-------
                             Legend
        40O  10OOr
oo
o  Oehydrogenase Activity
A  Total Suspended  Solids
•  Volatile Suspended Solids
a  ATP-OMSO
•  ATP - Bombed
o  Substrate
                                                                           '*o—
                                       -O-..
                                           """ ^ **•
                                            O "*--.
                                                                                      •'..
                                                         .•**••
                                                                                                                to9
                                                                                                                10
                                                                                                                10'
                                         10   12   14   16   18   20   22    24    26    28    30   32 " 46   48   50
                                                Time in Hours
                             Figure 25-   Heterogeneous Culture  Batch No. 6 With Acetic Acid
                                          Substrate

-------
oo
                                                               Legend:  o Dehydrogenase Activity
                                                                        A Total Suspended  Solids
                                                                        • Volatile Suspended  Solids
                                                                        ° ATP-DMSO
                                                                        • ATP-Bombed
                                                                          Substrate
                                                                                     \l
                    2    4    6    8    10    12    14    16   18   20   22   24   26   28   30
                                                  Time in  Hours
32   34
                           Figure 26.  Heterogeneous Culture Batch No.  7  With L-Alanine
                                       Substrate
                                                                                                             50
                                                                                                            10
                  •o
                  «
                  «*
                  
-------
                                               TABLE 23
                       Heterogeneous Anaerobic Culture Batch No. 1 With Leachate
Time,
hour
0
0.25
2.50
4.25
6.00
8.00
14.25
25.00
Leachate
by COD,
mg/1

330
307
279
250
213
160
133
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity , mg/1
27.9
84.8
91.6
64.1
61.3
-
-
62.0
Total Suspended
Solids, mg/1
990
810
730
720
735
725
805
740
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
490
430
395
355
370
360
420
375
Total Gas
Production, ml
0
0
70
160
270
410
680
870
00

-------
                                                      TABLE 24
                              Heterogeneous Anaerobic Culture Batch No. 2 With Leachate
Time,
hour
0
1.00
2.50
4.00
5.25
9.50
19.50
23.50
27.50
Leachate by
COD, mg/1
538
-
518
489
-
446
363
326

Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
45.5
51.7
44.4
34.4
-
-
25.5
25.5

Total
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
525
490
470
460
455
550
490
525
515
Volatile
Suspended
Solids , mg/1
320
275
270
275
310
330
310
335
295
ATP, fg/ml
DMSO
2.55 x 107
1.80 x 107
1.35 x 107
1.24 x 107
8.76 x 106
8.64 x 106
9.18 x 106
7.47 x 106
6.51 x 106
Bombing
9.40 x 106
6.22 x 105
5.32 x 105
6.33 x 105
4.58 x 105
3.71 x 105
5.2 x 105
6.57 x 105
5.34 x 105
Total Gas
Production ,
ml
0
30
90
160
200
420
800
900
980
00

-------
                                                     TABLE 25
                             Heterogeneous Anaerobic Culture Batch No. 3 With Leachate
Time,
hour
0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
13.5
24.0
54.0
Leachate by
COD, mg/1
774
738
-
760
741
723
701
647
621

Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
9.4
25.8
42.9
47.6
32.1
43.3
-
8.1
7.9

Total
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
3,190
2,990
3,405
3,380
3,220
3,350
3,170
3,100
2,930
2,775
Volatile
Suspended
Solids, mg/1
555
550
590
575
555
565
580
615
585
515
ATP By
DMSO
3.45 x 107
1.5 x 107
1.27 x 107
9.60 x 106
8.46 x 106
8.52 x 106
9.48 x 106
7.26 x 106
7.56 x 106
5.04 x 106
Bombing
1.48 x 106
1.07 x 106
7.11 x 105
1.24 x 106
1.64 x 106
5.03 x 105
1.13 x 106
6.33 x 105
8.63 x 105
3.62 X 105
Total Gas
Production ,
ml
0
40
180
280
360
490
570
780
1,020
1,210
00
oo

-------
00
                                                     Legend: o Dehydrogenase Activity
                                                             A Total Suspended Solids
                                                             ® Substrate
                                                             • Volatile Suspended Solids
                                                                                      Gas
                 24     6    8    10    12   14   16   18    20   22   24   26   28   30
                                            Time  in Hours
2   X102
     10

    -9

     8
                                                                                                         ff
                                                                                                       «3   -\
                                                                                                              .
                              Figure 21.  Heterogeneous AnaeroMc Culture Batch No.  1 With
                                           Leachate

-------
VO
o
                                       X    «TP-Bomk . .
             024    6    8    10   12   14   16    18    20   22   24   26   28
                                        Time  in  Hours
                                                                                                        x10
                                                                                                        - 7.5   -fl
                                                                                                  x10
                                                                                                  -8'
                                                                                                    (B
                                                                                                   4!
                                                                                                    1

                                                                                                   0    -1
                                                                                                           2
                                                                                                           0)
                                                                                                                   ~^
                                                                                                         2.5  -
10
105
                   Figure 28.  Heterogeneous Anaerobic  Culture  Batch No. 2  With

                                Leachate

-------
                                                                             10
                                                                              8
                             o  Dehydrogenase Activity
                             •  Volatile  Suspended Solids
                             °  ATP-DMSO
                             o  Substrate
                                                                      xlOO
                                                                       10
                                                                          10
                                                                      o
                                                                      **•
                                                                      s»_
                                                                      O

                                                                      •o
                                                                         O
                                                                                >
                                                                                •o
                                                                               
-------
                      TABLE 26
Ratios Between Biomass Parameters during Log Growth
              Phase of Batch Cultures
Substrate
Glucose
Galactose
Sucrose
Acetic Acid
Alanine
Glucose
Galactose
Sucrose
Acetic Acid
Alanine
Dehydrogenase
VSS
0.60 - 0.70
0.45 - 0.6
0.66
0.60
0.70
0.66
0.90
0.60
0.40
0.60
Plate Count
Coulter Counter
0.82
0.35 - 0.40
0.42
0.41
0.78
-
-
-
-
-
Culture
Pure culture with
E. coli
ii
ii
ii
ii
Heterogeneous
culture
n
n
n
n

-------
Continuous Culture Studies;

     The series of continuous culture experiments were continued to
study the application of dehydrogenase activity and ATP measurements
under steady state conditions.  Steady state was established by operating
the reactors for periods of 3 to 4 retention times prior to sampling and
analysis for each of the substrates.  The results are included in Tables
27-32 and Figures 30-35.  The substrates used during the studies included
not only simple sugars like glucose  (in aerobic and anaerobic) and
galactose but also industrial wastes from shellfish and chicken processing
plants and leachate from a solid waste disposal site.  Parameters monitored
in these studies were similar to those used during the batch culture
studies.  COD, 5-day biochemical oxygen demand  (BOD-) and/or total organic
cabon  (TOG) were used to measure the substrate  concentrations  for these
latter  indistrial wastes.

     The  data  on biomass measurement indicated  similarity  between parameter:
during  the steady state observations.  The  observed ratio  of  the dehydro-
genase  activity to suspended  solids  remained  fairly constant  and close  to
unity with the glucose  and galactose substrate  in the  aerobic  cultures
and  also  constant but lower  (0.70)  in  the anaerobic cultures  except
when very long retention  times  were investigated.  It  was  further observed
that this ratio was  0.35  on  chicken processing  wastes  and  0.60 on shell-
fish processing wastes  as shown in Table  33.   Since the dehydrogenase
activity was  reported decreasing in the  endogenous growth  phase during
batch  culture, it become  self-explanatory that  the preceding ratio  would
decrease at very  long retention times  where partial endogenous growth
existed.   It  became  more  evident when this ratio decreased to 0.30  with
 the same galactose substrate  in aerobic cultures and only the sludges
were being recycled  as  presented in the succeeding section of this
 report.  Unlike the correlations between ATP, organic nitrogen, or
 other parameters and VSS varing with the specific growth rates, it is
 very important to observe the consistent correlation between  the
 dehydrogenase activity and VSS with a given substrate in continuous
 cultures.

                                     93

-------
      The different organic character of the substrate resulted  in
 changing ratios of dehydrogenase activity to weight  of solids as
 Indicated for the selected industrial wastewaters.   It is  noted that
 not all  the volatile solids reported represented biological  mass.   The
 correlation established from the simple sugar substrate studies should
 be different from those for the industrial wastes investigated  here.
 By plotting data from studies on chicken and shellfish processing wastes
 the following emperical equation was obtained.

      X = 930 A + 10	   (2)

 where:   X = active biomass,  mg/1
          A = dehydrogenase activity  measured as  absorbance at 483 my
              and 1 cm light path

 From these data it follows that  once the  correlating  ratio between  the
 parameters have been established in  an actual waste  treatment process
 the active biomass could be monitored  more accurately  and  more  rapid
 corrective measures taken  as  problems  develop.

      Kinetic  constants  for all  studies were calculated and compared in
 Table 34.   The  maximum  specific  growth rate was  higher on  glucose-grown
 cultures  than  on the other sugars, amino  acids or industrial wastes.

      Continuous  Culture Studies  with Solids Recycle;   A continuous culture
 study with solids  recycle  was conducted with a galactose substrate as
 shown in  Table  35  and Figures 36  and 37.   These  results  indicated that
 the steady state  galactose concentrations  were much lower  than  those
 observed  in the  same  system without  recycle.  The biomass  concentrations
 as measured by  VSS,  dehydrogenase activity and ATP at  shorter retention
 times  were  observed almost  doubled as  the  recycle factor increased from
 1.6 to 5.8  and  inversely porportional  to  the settling  time in the clarifler,
 Increased  rates  of  substrate utilization with recycle  were attributed  to
opportunitites  for  more rapid growth and  the magnitude of  biomass con-
centration by recyle particularly at shorter retention times.

                                   94

-------
     To determine changes in active biomass with changes in specific
growth rate, dehydrogenase and ATP vs. VSS were plotted as shown on
Figure 38.  These data are included in Table 36 and indicated that the
ATP content in the solids rapidly increased and then decreased gradually
with the increase of growth rate.  At low specific growth rates (up to
1.5 day' ), ATP content increased to 0.45 mg ATP per gram VSS while at
high specific growth rates, ATP content decreased to a limiting range
of 0.25 - 0.27 mg ATP per gram VSS and finally decreased when organism
washout occurred.  The cause of this rapid increase followed by a
decrease has not been well established.  However, the same behavoir
                                                        (3)
was illustrated also by the data of Weddle and Jenkins     on activated
sludge although this early increase was essentially ignored  in their
analysis.  The ATP content of pure cultures have been reported varying
                                                (35 39)
from 0.02 to 1.2 percent on a dry weight bases     *    , while those
for activated sludge of 0.2 and 0.3 mg ATP/g dry weight by Patterson,
££. fLL-    and UP to 2>0 mS ATP/8 ss by Biospherics      are in good agree-
ment with the data obtained from the  study with solids  recycle.   The
initital  rapid increase of ATP content per weight  of VSS  could reflect
more growth due to the sufficiently high  availability  of  substrates which
may not have been possible at  longer  retention times.   The decrease of
ATP appeared to have resulted  from either washout  of certain organisms
of high ATP  content or a  smaller  capacity for  ATP  storage inside  the
cells  when  organisms grow faster  by utilizing  more energy at higher
growth rates.  Therefore,  the  correlation between  ATP  and VSS could
be meaningfully  applied  for  control of  continuous  culture type  systems
within the  growth ranges  where essentially not much change occurred
 (above 2.0  day   ).

      The  dehydrogenase activity  increased steadily with growth rate
 ( to a specific  growth rate of 3 day  )  and then remained essentially
 constant  until washout occurred.   However, the ratio between the
 dehydrogenase and VSS indicated virtually no sifnificant change through-
 out the range of specific growth rates covered, even though it was
 recognized that  the overall 0.30 level was only one third of that from
 the study without solids recycle  (Table 28).  The existence of a partial

                                     95

-------
endogenous growth phase by solids recycle was considered the major cause
of a decreased ratio.  Generally constant nature of this correlation
between dehydrogenase activity per weight of biomass permits the
determination of active biomass concentrations in cultures  operating
at any practical growth rate by establishing a standard curve correlating
these parameters at exponential growth.
                                    96

-------
VO
                                           TABLE  27




                        Continuous Culture Study  with Glucose  Substrate
Re tens ion
Time, hr.
24.0
18.5

15.5

12.3

6.0
4.0
Glucose
mg/1
0.3
0.4

_

6.0

14.7
70.7
Biomass Concentra
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
89.9
_

121.2
140.0
111.6
135.5
71.5
33.0
Total Suspended
Solids , mg/1
115
125.0
127.5
120
150
97.5
105
65
32
tions
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
100
110
115
110
115
80

65
32

-------
                                             TABLE 28
                        Continuous Culture Study with Galactose Substrate
oo
Retention
Timef Hrs.
5.92
5.83
3.81
2.96
2.84
2.06
1.65
Galactose,
mg/1
4.3
4.0
1.9
87.7
26.8
24.0
133.9
Biomass Concentrations
Dehydrogenase
Activity/ mg/1
83.5
63.9
92.5
40.0
98.8
53.9
54.5
Total Suspended
Solids, mg/1
90.0
66.0
102.0
60.0
100.0
63.0
53.1

-------
                                             TABLE 29
                    Continuous Culture Study with Shellfish Processing  Wastes
v£>
/
Retention
Time / Hrs .
12
10
8
6
4
2
Substrate
by BOD5,
mg/1
50.0
33.3
-
47.6
95.1
166.1
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity
mg/1
-
41.7
58.0
-
66.7
8.8
Total
Suspended
Solids,
mg/1
88
84
83
-
102
94
ATP, fg/ml
DMSO X 106
9.1
26.0
36.0
-
49.2
17.5
Bombing
X 106
8.2
4.1
10.0
-
7.4
5.1

-------
                                              TABLE 30
                       Continuous Culture Study with Chicken Processing Wastes
Retention
Time, Hrs.
20
16
11
8
6
2
Substrate
BOD5,
mg/1
116
	
118
130
125
160
COD,
mg/1
157
	
165
	
185
260
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase
Activity ,
mg/1
54.6
	
30.7
	
69.9
45 .6
Total
Suspended
Solids ,
mg/1
193
220
116
150
176
75
ATP, fg/ml
DMSO
5.60 x 107
	
3.59 x 107
9.18 x 106
5.21 x 107
3.79 x 107
Bombing
1.26 x 107
	
3.75 x 106
2.14 x 105
2.78 x 106
5.42 x 106
o
o

-------
              TABLE 31
Continuous Culture Study with Leachate
Retention
Time , Hrs .
15
10
5
2
Leachate by
TOC,
mg/1
273
307
385
596
COD,
mg/1
700
674
850
1860
Biomass Concentrations by
Dehydrogenase
Activity,
mg/1
495
672
1064
	
Total
Suspended
Solids,
mg/1
3116
3450
5470
3150
Volatile
Suspended
Solids ,
mg/1
1993
2040
2940
1235
ATP,
fg/ml
7.6 x 107
	
1.53 x 108
1.99 x 107

-------
                   TABLE 32
Anaerobic Digester with Heterogeneous Cultures
          in Continuous Flow System
Retention
Time, Hr.
44.7
28.7
26.5
20.0
16.6
8.8
6.0
4,0
Glucose
mg/1
1.0
2.5
5.0
14.0
15.3
5.3
10.6
194.0
Biomass Concentrations by
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
154.9
219.4
250.0
300.0
284.0
347.0
116.0
93.6
Total
Suspended
Solids,
mg/1
384
458
384
355
365
307
279
235
Volatile
Suspended
Solids/
mg/1
110
270
180
173
177
166
132
95

-------
                                             JSS
                                                            Dehydrogenase
                 10   12   14   16   18
                        Time in Hours
24   26   28  30
Figure 30.   Continuous Culture Study With Glucose  Substrate

-------
 120-
 100
t
.9
a

1
  60
O
  40
  20
                                 "	Gilictost
                        234
                           Retention Time in Hours
6
        Figure  31.   Continuous Culture Study With Galactose
                                  104

-------
200
                                        TP-OMSO
                               6    7    8    9   10   11
                               Retention Time  in Hour*
10
                                                                                  10
                                                                                     H
                                                                                   7 -o
                                                                                     
-------
                      B    10   «   f4   Y6   IB   20  22    24
                                                                   -108
                                                                    .6
Figure 33.  Continuous  Culture Study With Chicken Processing Waste
                                  106

-------
                                                                                             xlO
                                                                                              6
O
O
o
      25
                                                                                        -f10
                                                                                                OH
                                                                                                5*
                                                                                                3
                                3 -

                                 10
                          10
             11     i     i     i     i     i    i     i    i
       0     1    2     3    4     S     6     7    •    I    10
                                Rvtontlon Tim* in  Hours
tl    12   M    14   15
                          10   J
                        Figure 3^.   Continuous Culture Study With Leachatp

-------
o
00
1O   12    14   16   18   2O   22   24   26   28   30   32   34   36
                                               Retention Time in Hours
           024
                            Figure 35-  Anaerobic Digester With Heterogeneous  Populations in

                                        Continuous Flow System

-------
                      TABLE 33

Summary of Correlations between Biomass Parameters
           in Continuous Culture Studies
Substrates
glucose
galactose
chicken waste
shellfish waste
galactose with Recycle
glucose
Dehydrogenase
VSS
0.8 ~ 1.0
0.9 ~ 1.0
0.3 ~ 0.4
0.5 " 0.6
0.2 ~ 0.3
0.6 ~ 0.8
Ma ATP
mq VSS
-
-
0.27 ~ 0.29
0.30 ~ 0.63
0.26 ~ 0.46
-
Remarks
aerobic cultures
ii
it
»
ii
anaerobic cultures

-------
                                         TABLE  34
                                Kinetic Growth  Constants
         Experiment
   Substrate
Maximum Specific
  Growth Rate,
     hour"1
Saturation
 Constant,
   mg/1
Pure Culture            No. 1
Pure Culture            No. 2
Pure Culture            No. 3
Pure Culture            No. 5
Pure Culture            No. 6
Pure Culture            No. 8
Pure Culture            No. 9
Heterogeneous Culture   No. 1
Heterogeneous Culture   No. 2
Heterogeneous Culture   No. 3
Heterogeneous Culture   No. 4
Continuous Culture
Continuous Culture
Continuous Culture
Continuous Culture
Anaerobic Digester
Glucose
Glucose
Glucose
Galactose
Galactose
Acetic Acid
Acetic Acid
Glucose
Glucose
Galactose
Galactose
Glucose
Shellfish Waste
Leachate
Galactose
Glucose
      0.040
      0.079
      0.056
      0.037
      0.025
      0.021
      0.017
      0.457
      0.328
      0.141
      0.098
      0.625
      0.40
      1.0
      0.46
      0.435
   118.2
   416.0
   538.0
    96.9
   181.0
 1,165.0
 4,230.0
   995.0
 2,460.0
   150.5
   146.0
     4.1
    45.0*
 1,460  **
     5.7
    19.60
*  BOD5 basis
** COD basis

-------
                              TABLE 35
Continuous Culture Study with Galactose Substrate and  Solids  Recycle
Retention
Time,
hour
11.9
6.0
2.5
1.25
0.80
Galactose,
mg/1
2.6
3.4
1.2
10.4
405.0
Biomass Concentrations By
Dehydrogenase Activity, mg/1
Reactor
114.5
141.0
212.0
445.0
249.0
Clarifier
Effluent
43.7
23.8
11.2
32.8
19.0
Volatile Suspended Solids,
mg/1
Reactor
655
570
770
1,270
840
Clarifier
Effluent
400
195
210
220
200
ATP, x 10 8, fg/ml
Reactor
1.91
2.62
2.29
3.58
2.16
Clarifier
Effluent
1.25
1.84
1.30
1.34
0.70

-------
                       TABLE  36
        Summary of Growth Constants and Ratios
      Between Parameters in Solids Recycle Study
               with Galactose Substrate
Retention
Time
(hour)
11.90
6.00
2.50
1.25
0.80
Recycle
Factor*
1.64
2.92
3.67
5.77
4.20
Specific**
Growth ,
Rate , day"
1.22
1.37
2.46
3.23
7.22
ATP vs .
VSS,
mg ATP
g VSS
0.292
0.457
0.377
0.282
0.257
Dehydrogenase
Activity
vs. VSS
0.18
0.24
0.28
0.35
0.30
*   Ratio of VSS in reactor to the VSS in clarifier effluent,
**
u - fl •    1 ,
M   V   (R.F.)

      where   p = specific growth rate, day

              Q = influent, I/day

              V = volume, 1

           R.F. = Recycle Factor
                          112

-------
 5    6    7    8    9
R*ttntion Time in Hours
10
11
                                                        12   13
Figure 36.  Continuous Culture  Study With Galactose Substrate  and
            With Solids Recycle
                                113

-------
 2000 r
  1800
  1200
  1000-
g  800-
10

o
0  600-
   400
   200-
Hydraulic Retention Time  in Hours


   2J5       1.25            	
                                                                  0.8
                                                                          -i500
                               /
                              '  TSS, Effluent

                                          Dehydrogenase, Reactor
                                                                          7.2
                           Specific Growth Rate, day
   Figure 37.   Active Biomass Measurements  in Continuous Culture Study
                tftth. Solids Recycle
                                      114

-------
   LOT
   0.6
M  0.6
(0
e
o»
2
•o
   0-4
   0.
                         Legend:
ATP/VSS
D*hydrog«nasa/VSS
                                                                      0.*
                                                                       0.4
                                  0.3 g


                                     I

                                  0.2 j;

                                     I

                                  0.1
                             5-	          _-•          -•	
                             .4          3.6         4.8
                            Specific  Growth Rate, day'1
                          8.0
   Figure 38,  Effect of Specific Growth. Rate on Correlations Betveen
                Biomass Measurements in Continuous Culture Study With
                Recycle
                                    115

-------
     Nutrient Deficiency Studies - Heterogeneous batch cultures on media
deficient in nitrogen or phosphorus were grown on glucose as the sole
carbon and energy source in order to investigate the effect on the
dehydrogenase actibity.  In the nitrogen deficiency study, the ratios
of carbon to nitrogen were selected at 10, 20 and 30 to successive
batches (nos. 1, 2 & 3) and the results are shown in Tables 37,38 and 39
and Figures 39, 40 and 41.  Carbon to phosphorus ratios of 150 and 200
were selected in phosphorus deficiency studies.  No measurable growth
was observed in the latter and the results, of the former (Batch No. 4)
are shown in Table 40 and Figure 42.

     It was observed that the dehydrogenase activity was again a very
sensitive indicator of the biomass and the same correlation was established
with VSS, except with cultures grown on extreme nitrogen and phosphorus
deficiencies, i.e., when C/N was 30 and C/P was 150.  However, the ATP
data indicated good agreement with VSS even during extreme deficiencies.
For instance, about 75 percent of the maximum ATP and VSS in Batch No. 1
(Table 41) was observed in Batch No. 3 while only a third of the dehydro-
genase activities was indicated.  Therefore, it could be deduced that
the dehydrogenase activity was limited in application under extreme
nutrient deficiency, while the ATP measurement was acceptable even under
this condidion.  Since the carbon to nitrogen ratio in domestic sewage
normally does not indicate such a deficiency, the application of the
dehydrogenase test remains viable.
                                    116

-------
                   TABLE 37
Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 1  (C/N=10)
Time,
hour
0
1.0
4.5
6.0
7.0
8.0
13.0
24.0
28.5
30.5
Glucose,
mg/1
1,000
1,000
-
541
102
15
0
0
0
0
Biomass By
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1

0
122.9
211.4
227
-
223
10
0
0
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1

40
-
250
220
280
290
105
-
50
ATP
x 107, fg/ral

6.76
8.37
12.10
13.10
11.10
15.30
8.30
3.99
1.70

-------
00
                                            TABLE 38




                      Nutrient  Deficient Culture Batch No. 2,  (c/N = 20)
Time,
hours
0
1.0
2.5
4.5
6.3
7.5
14.5
24.0
29.3
53.3
Glucose,
mg/1
1025
972
863
580
488
399
0
0
0
0
Biomass bv
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
-
8.5
104.0
210.0
185.0
222.0
205.0
71.0
84.8
-
Volatile Suspended
Solids, rag/1
52
68
92
200
190
185
280
280
255
185
ATP
x 10, fg/ml
-
6.72
-
12.30
15.10
26.70
-
13.40
8.88
5.43

-------
                                             TABLE 39




                        Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No.  3.  (C/S  = 30)
\o
Time,
hours
1.0
2.0
3.3
Glucose,
mg/1
975
988
940
5.3 1000
i
6.5
7.5
8.3
12.3
22.5
25.0
28.8
52.3
700
525
412
84
0
0
0
0
Biomass by
Dehydrogenase
Activity, mg/1
—
-
9.1
19.4
39.5
57.8
-
66.7
35.5
36.9
40.8
16.0
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
20
30
26
36
83.5
116.0
180.0
200.0
180.0
185.0
185.0
225
ATP
x 10 , fg/ml
1.80
2.27
2.43
6.12
8.84
5.98
5.98
11.30
9.32
7.93
7.28
8.02

-------
                                             TABLE 40
                      Nutrient Deficient Culture Batch No. 4 (c/P = 150)
NJ
o
Time,
hours
0
2.0
4.0
6.0
7.5
11.5
24.5
29.0
Glucose,
mg/1
826
806
813
780
767
737
687
670
— • 	 	 	 r
Rtoroass By
Dehyd r oge na s e
Activity, mg/1
-
6.8
7.9
18.8
13.9
-
-
-
Volatile Suspended
Solids, mg/1
-
25
50
60
55
65
75
65
ATP
x 107, fg/ml
-
1.08
1.26
1.87
2.36
3.08
2.81
2.64

-------
                            TABLE 41
Comparison of Biomass from Nutritional Deficiency Culture Studies


Biomass By

Max. VSS, mg/1
Max. Dehydrogenase , mg/1
Max. ATP, mg/1
Batch No.
i

C/N=10
290
227
150
2

C/N=20
280
200
134
3

C/N=30
200
70
114
4

C/P=150
75
19
31

-------
                xlOO
NJ
to
        4OO   10
        300
         200
       o
         100
                                          10    12    14   16   18   20   22   24   26   28   3O
2
                                                                            32
                                                                                                             ixifl
                                                                                              >
                                                                                              TJ
                                                                                                                   (Q

                                                                                                                   3
                                                                                                             IX It
                                                                                                             1 xlO
                                  Figure 39-  Nutrient Deficient  Culture Batch No. 1 (C/N=10)

-------
10
U)
                  30?°
                 25
                 20
                 15
               8
                 10
                                                             vss
                                                     14   16  Y9  10   22   24  26   28   30  32
                                                                                                     50
                                                                                                     10
                                                                                                    J5
                               Figure UO.  Nutrient Deficient Culture  Batch No. 2 (C/N=20)

-------
  300-



  280-



  260



  240



  220-



  200-



  iao.



  160-



  140-



j? 120-
o
m
   40-
   20-
10-
  xlO
                                 10    12   14   16   18   20   22   24   26   28   30   32
           468




              Figure  1*1.  Nutrient Deficient  Culture Batch  No. 3  (C/N=30)

-------
NJ
Ul
         (O
         CO
         
-------
 Cost Analysis;

     The results obtained to date are encouraging with respect to the
use of dehydrogenase activity as a measure of active biomass con-
centration in biological systems.  Moreover, this analysis may prove
far less tedious and costly than other methods of analysis and
appears to be more reliable and interpretable than other techniques.
Some comparison of the cost of analytical techniques has been includ-
ed in Appendix D.  It is anticipated that these studies will provide
the basis for an analytical method for the determination and applica-
tion of dehydrogenase activity to design and control of biological
waste treatment processes.
                                  126

-------
                                  SECTION VI

                                  REFERENCES

1.   Ford, D.  L.,  Yang,  J.  T.,  and W. U. Eckenfelder, "Dehydrogenase
     Enzyme as a Parameter of Activated Sludge Activities", Proceed-
     ings of the 21st Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,
     Extension Series. 121. pp. 534-543 (1967).

2.   Patterson, J. W., Brezonik, P., and H. D. Putnam, "Sludge Activity
     Parameters and Their Application to Toxicity Measurements and
     Activiated Sludge", Proceedings of the 24th Industrial Waste
     Conference, Purdue University,  (May6-8, 1969).

3.   Weddle, C. and D. Jenkins, "The Viability and Activity of Activated
     Sludge", 42nd Annual Conference of Water Pollution Control Federation
     Dallas, Texas (Oct. 6, 1969).

4.   Mahler, H. R., and E. H.  Cordes, Biological Chemistry, Harper & Row,
     Co., New York, pp. 381-383 (1966).

5.   Genetelli, E. J.,  "DNA and Nitrogen Relationships in  Bulking Activated
     Sludge", Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 39,  (10, pt. 3),
     pp.  32-44  (1967).

6.   Webb,  J. M.,  and H. B. Levy,  "  A Sensitive Method for the Determination
     of  DNA in  Tissues  and Microorganisms",  Journal  of Biological Chemistry.
     213. pp.  107-117  (1955).

7.   Conn,  E.  E.,  and P. K.  Stumpf,  Outlines of Biochemistry,  John  Wiley
     & Sons,  New  York,  p.  90  (1964).

8,   Hattingh,  W.  H.  J.,  and M.  L. Siebert,  "Determination of the De-
     oxyribonucleic  Acid  (DNA) Content  of Anaerobic  Sludge",  First Annual
     Report,  Research Grant  RG8204,  U.S. Public Health Service, (Feb. 15,
      1963).
                                      127

-------
     A ardy  F. •!•» Cole, R. E., and E. A. Pearsons, "Kinetic and Activity
     Parameters of Anaerobic Fermentation Systems", First Annual Report,
     Research Grant RG8204, U.S. Public Health Service,  (Feb. 15, 1963).

XO.  Agardy, F. J., Cole, R. E., and E. A. Pearson, "Enzyme Activity as a
     Parameter of Digester Performance", Purdue Industrial Waste Conference,
     Purdue University,  (May, 1963).

11.  Agardy, F. J., and W. C. Shepherd, "DNA - A Rational Basis for Digester
     Loadings", California Water Pollution Control Association Conference.
     Fresno, California  (April  23-24, 1964).

12.  Fisher, W. L. "Determination of DNA in Digester Sludge", M.S. Thesis.
     San Jose State College, San Jose, California  (June, 1965).

13.  Hattingh, W. H. J., and M. L. Siebert, "Determination of Protein
     Content of Anaerobic Sludge", Water Research, !_, pp. 185-189 (1967).

 -4.  Holm-Hansen, 0., Sutcliffe, W. H., Jr., and J. Sharp, "Measurement
     of DNA in the Ocean and its Ecological Significance", Limnology and
     Oceanography. 13, pp. 506-513 (1968).

15.  Irgens, R. L. "DNA Concentration as an Estimate of  Sludge Biomass",
     Water Pollution Control Research Series, Project RG 17070 DHO,
     Environmental Protection Agency (Feb. 1971).

16.  Stanier, R. Y., Doudoroff, M., and E. A. Adelberg, The Microbial
     World, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood  Cliffs, N. J.,
     p. 240 (1963).

17.  Goldsby, R. A., Cells and  Energy, MacMillan Co., New York, N.Y., p. 23
     (1967).

18.  Seliger, H. H., and W. D.  McElroy, "Spectral  Emission and Quantum
     Yield of Firefly Biolutninescence", Archives of Biochemistry and
     Biophysics,,88, pp. 136-141 (1960).
                                     128

-------
19.   Strehler, B. L.,  and J.  R. Trotter,  "Firefly Luminescence in the
     Study of Energy Transfer Mechnistns.  I. Substrate and Enzyme Deter-
     minations", Archives of  Biochemistry and Biophysics, 40, pp. 28-41,
     (1952).

20.   Rhodes, W. C., and W. D. McElroy, "The Synthesis and Function of
     Luciferly-adenylate  (LH--AMP) and Oxyluciferyl-adenylate  (1-AMP)",
     Journal of Biological Chemistry, 233  (2), pp. 1528-1537  (1958).

21.   Mitchell, G., and J. W. Hastings, "Flavin Isomers and Color of
     Bacterial Bioluminescence", Journal of Biological Chemistry, 244
     (1), pp. 2572-2578  (1969).

22.  Hastings, J. W. Riley, W. H., and J.  Massa,  "The Purification,
     Properties, and Chemiluminescent Quantum Yield  of Bacterial
     Luciferase", Journal of Biological  Chemistry. 240.  pp.  1473-1479
      (1965).

23.  Hastings,  J. W.,  "Bioluminescence", Annual  Review of Biochemistry
      J7_,  pp.  597-627  (1968).

24.   Henry, J.  P.,  Isambert, M.  F.,  and  A. M. Michelson, "Studies in
      Bioluminescence  in the  Pholas  dactylus System", Biochimica Biophysica
      Acta.  205.  pp.  437-450  (1970).

 25.   Mitchell,  G.,  "Light-induced Bioluminescence: Isolation and Character-
      ization of a Specific  Protein Involved in the Adsorption and Delayed
      Emission of Light", Biochemistry,  9.  (13),  pp. 2699-2707  (1970).

 26.   Hastings, J. W.,  and L. Weber, "Structurally Distinct Bacterial
      Lucif erases", Biochemistry, 8_, pp.  4681 (1969).

 27.   McElroy, W. D., "The Energy Source of Bioluminescence in an Isolated
      System", National Academy of Science, 33, pp.  342-348  (1947).
                                    129

-------
28   McElroy, W. D., and A. Green,  "Function of Adenosine Trlphosphate
     in the Activation of Luciferin", Archives of Biochemistry and  Bio-
     physics . 64_, pp. 257-271  (1956).

29.  Schram, E., "Use of Scintillation Counters for Bioluminescence Assay
     of Adenosine Triphosphate", The Current Status of Liquid Scintilla-
     tion Counting, E. D. Brandsome, Jr., editor; Grune  & Stratton,
     New York, N. Y., pp. 129-133  (1970).

30.  McElroy, W. D., Seliger,  H. H. and E. H. White,  "Mechanisms  of
     Bioluminescence, Chemiluminescence, and Enzyme Function in the
     Oxidation of Firefly Luciferase", Photochemistry and Photobiology.
     10_, pp. 153-170 (1969).

31.  Cole, H. A., Wimpenny, J. W. T., and D. E. Hughes,  "The ATP  pool
     in Escherichia coli. I. Measurement Using a Modified Luciferase
     Assay", Biochemica et Bjophysica Acta, 143, pp. 445-453, (1967).

32.  Welsch, F., and L. Smith, "Kinetics of Synthesis and Utilization of
     Adenosine Triphosphate in Rhodo s p irjL 1 lum rub rum", Biochemistry, 8_,
     pp. 3403-3408 (1969).

33.  Roberton, A. M., and R. S. Wolfe, "Adenosine Triphosphate Pools
     in Methanobacterium", Journal  of Bacteriology, 102, pp. 43-51
     (1970).

34.  Strange, R. E., Wade, H.  E., and F. A. Dark, "Effect of Staravation
     on ATP Concentration in Aerobacter aerogenes", Nature,199, pp. 55-
     67 (1963).

35.  Holm-Hansen, 0., and C. R. Booth, "The Measurement  of Adenosine Tri-
     phosphate in the Ocean and Ecological Singificance", Limnology an
     Oceanography. 11, pp. 510-519  (1966).

36.  Hamilton, R. D., and Holm-Hansen 0., "Adenosine Triphosphate Content
     of Marine Bacteria", Limnology and Oceanography. 12_, pp. 319-324  (.1967)
                                    130

-------
37,  Patterson, J. W.  Brezonik, P. L., and H. D. Putnam, "Measurement
     and Singificance of Adenosine Triphosphate in Activated Sludge",
     Environmental Science and Technology. 4^ (7)> pp. 569-575  (1970).

38.  Aledort, L,, Weed, R. I. and S. B. Troup. "Ionic Effect on Firefly
     Bioluuminescence Assay of Red Blood Cells (RBC) ATP", Analytical
     Biochemistry. 17» PP- 268-277 (1966).

39.  Forrest, W. W. "ATP Pool during Growth Cycle in Streptococcus
     faecalis", Journal of Bacteriology, 90, pp. 1013-1018 (1965).

40.  Forrest, W. W., and D. J. Walker, "Synthesis of Reserve Materials
     for Endogenous Metabolism in Streptococcus faecalia", Journal
     of Bacteriology. 89_, pp. 1448-1452  (1965).

41.  Knowles,  C. J., and L. Smith, "Measurement of ATP  Levels  of Intact
     Azobacter vinelandii", Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 197, pp. 152-
     160 (1970).

42.  Lyman, G., and J. DeVincenzo, "Determination of Picogram  Amounts
     of ATP Using  the Luciferin-Luciferase Enzyme System", Analytical
     Biochemistry. 21, pp. 435  (1967).

43.  Holmsen,  H.,  Holmsen, I., A. Barnhardeas,  "Microdetermination
     of ADP and ATP in Plasma with Firefly Luciferase  System", Analytical
     Biochemistry. 17., pp. 456-473  (1966).

44.  Lin,  S.,  and  H. P.  Cohen,  "Measurement  of  Adenosine Triphosphate'
     Content  of  Crayfish Stretch Receptor Cell  Preparations",  Analytical
     Biochemistry. 24_, pp. 531-540  (1968).

45.  Klofat,  W.,  Picciolo, G.,  Chappell, E.  W.,  and E. Freese, "Production
     of ATP  in Normal  Cells  and Sporulation  Mutants of Bacillus subtilis",
     Journal  of Biological Chemistry.  244. pp.  3270 (1969).
                                   131

-------
 46.   Addanki,  S.,  Sotos,  J.  F.,  and P.  D.  Rearick,  "Rapid Determination
      of  Picomole Quantities  of ATP with Liquid Scintillation Counter",
      Analytical Biochemistry.  14,  pp.  261-264 (1966).

 47.   Stanley,  P.  E.,  "Determination of  Subpicomole  Levels of NADH and
      FMN Using Bacterial  Luciferase and the Liquid  Scintillation
      Spectrometer", Analytical Biochemistry.  39.  pp. 441-453 (1971).

 48.   Stanley,  P.  E. and S. G.  Williams,  "Use  of Liquid  Scintillation
      Spectrometers  for Determining Adenosine  Triphosphate by the
      Luciferase Enzyme",  Analytical Biochemistry, 29, pp. 381-392
      (1969).

 49.   St. John  J.  B.,  "Determination of  ATP in Chlorella with Luciferin-
      Luciferase Enzyme System",  Analytical Biochemistry.  37,  pp.  402-408
      (1970).

 50.   D'Eustachio, A.  J. and  D. R.  Johnson, "Adenosine Triphosphate Content
      of  Bacteria",  Abstract  #3062  from  Federation Proceedings,  p.  761
      (1968).

 51.   Sharpe, A.  N., Woodward,  M. N.  and  A. K,  Jackson,  "ATP  Levels
      in  Foods  Contaiminated  by Bacteria",  The Journal of  Applied Bac-
      teriology.  33_, pp. 758-767  (1970).

 52.   Defresne,  L.,  and H. J. Gitelman,  "A  Semiautomated Procedure
      for  Determination of Adenosine  Triphosphate",  Analytical Biochemistry.
      37.,  pp. 402-408  (1970).

53.  Kao, I. C., Chiu, S. Y.,  Fan, L. T.,  and Erickson, L. E.,  "ATP pools
     in Pure and Mixed Cultures",  Journal  Water Pollution Control  Federation,
     45_, pp. 926-931  (1973).

54.  Biospherics, Inc., "Biomass Determination -A New Technique for Acti-
     vated Sludge Control", Project  Report, No. 17050,  EOY,  U.S.  Environ-
     mental Protection Agency  (1972).
                                     132

-------
55.   Post,  R.  L.f  Merritt,  C.  R.,  Kinsolving,  C.  R.  and C.  D.  Albright,
     "Membrane ATP-ase and  Active  Transport",  Journal of Biological
     Chemistry, 235, pp.  1796-1802 (1960).

56.   Nicholas, D.  J. D.,  and C. R. Clark",  Bioluminescent Method for
     Determining Micro Quantities  of Ammonia in a Liquid Scintillation
     Spectrometer", Analytical Biochemistry, 42,  pp. 560-561 (1971).

57.   Brolin, S. E., "Photokinetic Micro Assay on Dehydrogenase Reactions
     and Bacterial Luciferase", Analytical Biochemistry, 42, pp. 124-135
     (1971).

58.  Lenhard,  G., Nourse, L. D., and H. M. Schwarts, "Dehydrogenase
     Activity  of Activated Sludges", Advances in Water Pollution Research
     £, pp. 105-127  (1965).

59.  Lenhard,  G.,  "A Standardized Procedure  for the Determination of
     Dehydrogenase  Activity in Samples of Anaerobic Treatment  System",
     Water  Research,  2_, pp. 161-167  (1968).

60.  Bucksteeg, W.,  "Determination  of  Sludge  Activity  - A  Possibility
     of Controlling Sludge Plants",  Advances  in  Water  Pollution Research
     2., pp. 83-102 (1966).

61.  Jones, P. H.  and D. Prasad,  "The  Use  of  Tetrazolium Salts as  a Measure
     of  Sludge Activity",  Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation,  4^,
      (11),  pt. 2,  R441-449  (1969).

62.   Shih,  C. S.,  and V. T.  Stack,  Jr.,  "Temperature Effects on Energy
      Oxygen Requirements in Biological Oxidations", Journal Water Pollution
      Control Federation. 4JL,   (11), pt. 2,  R461-473  (1969).

 63.   Marlar,  J.,  "The Effect of Turbulence on Bacterial Substrate Utilization",
      M.S.  Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology,  Atlanta, Georgia (Dec-
      ember, 1968).

                                     133

-------
64.  Ghosh, S., "Kinetics of Aerobic Utilization of Mixed Sugars by
     Heterogeneous Microbial Populations", Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia
     Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia  (Nov., 1969).

65.  Dean, A. C. R., and P. J. Rodgers, "Steady State Levels of Dehydro-
     genases and a-and $-Glucosidases in Klebsiella aerogenes", Journal of
     General Microbiology, 5]_, pp. 102-122 (1971).

66.  Randall, C. W., Turpin, J. K., and P. H. King," Activated Sludge
     Dewatering: Factors Affecting Drainability", Journal Water Pollution
     Control Federation. 43, (1), pp. 102-122 (1971).

67.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th
     edition, APHA (1971).

68.  Rhines, C. E., "Decontamination of Membrane Filter Holders by
     Ultraviolet Light", Journal American Water Works Association. 57,
     p. 500  (1965).

69.  "Glucostat for the Enzymatic Determination of Glucose", Worthing-
     ton Biochemical Corporation, Freehold, New Jersey (1965).

70.  "Galactostat:  A Coupled Enzyme System for the Determination of Galactose",
     Worthing Biochemical Corporation, Freehold, New Jersey  (1966).

71.  Swanton, E. M. Curby, W. A., and H. E. Lind, "Experiences with the
     Coulter Counter in Bacteriology", Applied Microbiology  10, pp. 480-
     485 (1962).

72.  Fraser, D., "Bursting Bacteria by Release of Gas Pressure", Nature,
     167,  pp. 33-34 (1951).
                                    134

-------
                                  SECTION VI






                                  APPENDICES






                                                                  Page






A.   Total Suspended Solids Determination                          136






B.   ATP Extraction Procedure                                      138






C.   Procedure for Dehydrogenaae Test                              139






D.   Time and Cost Summary of Various Analytical Techniques        140
                                     135

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                      TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS DETERMINATION

Procedure

1.   Wash 0.45 y white grid 47 mm Millipore filters with distilled water
     under vacuum for approximately two minutes in order to remove the
     glycerine and wetting agent and to insure a constant tare weight.
     Lable filters and dry filters for 30 minutes at 103°C and desiccate
     for 30 minutes prior to weighing.

2.   Weigh and record tare weight of each filter.  Store filters in desi-
     ccator prior to use.

3.   Each sample is filtered through a pair of tared filters.  The top
     filter in the pair is the test filter which will retain the solids,
     while the bottom filter in the pair is the control filter.

4.   Using forceps, place the pair of filters on a fritted base of the
     filter holder so that the test filter is above the control filter.
     Place the funnel on top of the fritted based and clamp securely.

5.   Pipet the selected volume of sample into funnel, apply vacuum to the
     filter, wash inside of funnel free of any attached solids, then filter
     to dryness.

6.   Release vacuum, remove clamp, and funnel from the holder, and with
     forceps carefully remove and separate the pair of filters.  (Use
     care not to disturb the surface of the test filter.)  Place each
     filter on a teflon pad (wet filter tend to stick to glass).

7.   Dry filters at 103°C for 30 minutes.  Desiccate for 30 minutes
     after drying.  Reweigh each filter and record its final weight.
                                    136

-------
8.   Subtract  tare w«ight from the final weight of each filter.  The
     results obtained for the test filter gives the uncorrected weight of
     the sample solids while that for the control filter gives the gain
     or the loss in weight.

9.   Apply control filter weight change as a correction factor to each
     test filter result, substracting this factor when the control filter
     shows a weight increase or adding the factor when the control filter
     shows a weight decrease.

10.  Compute the dry bacterial solids concentration from the determined
     weight of solids and the known volume of the sample filtered.
                                    137

-------
                                  APPENDIX B

                           ATP EXTRACTION PROCEDURES

1.   Add 0.5 ml sample to a test tube containing 1.0 ml of 90% Dimethyl
     Sulfoxide (DMSO).

2.   Mix 10 seconds by vortex mixer.

3.   Allow to stand at room temperature for 2 minutes, the optimum
     recovery time.

A.   Add 5.0 ml of 0.01 M morpholinopropane sulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer.

5.   Mix the solution thoroughly.

6.   Place tube contianing test material into ice bucket until assayed.

7.   Assay the solution directly using the following formula to convert
     Biometer readings to units per milliliter of sample.
     Units/ml - Biometer Reading x 13
                                    138

-------
                                  APPENDIX C

                       PROCEDURE FOR DEHYDROGENASE TEST

1.    Set up 3 NPN tubes:   one for blank and two for samples in duplicate.
     Pipette 8 ml of distilled water into blank tube.

2.    Pipette 1 ml Tris buffer into each tube.

3.    Disintegrate the sample at 30 atmospheres of nitrogen (Parr Bomb)
     or at 15,000 rpm in a blender for 2 minutes.  Pipette 8 ml of sample
     into two sample tubes.

4.    Incubate at 37°C and bubble nitrogen at slow rate.

5.    After 10 minutes, add 1 ml TTC-glucose to all tubes and return the
     TTC-glucose to refrigerator.

6.    Incubate for 60 minutes and continue nitrogen flow.   Cover tubes with
     black plastic sheet.

7.    After 60 minutes add 1 ml of formaldehyde.  Also  add  1 ml of 4 N
     HCI to each tube.  Stop nitrogen flow.

8.   Wash nitrogen purging tubes with 95%  ethyl  alcohol.

9.   Dilute samples and blank  to  50 ml mark •  Mix.

10,  Keep samples  in  darkness  for 30 minutes.

11.  Filter through cotton  In  a funnel and Into  cuvette (10  or  1  cm
     ligh path).

12.  Read and note X  transmittance at  483 my  and 0.05  mm slit width.
                                     139

-------
                                              APPENDIX D
                      TIME AND COST SUMMARY OP SELECTED ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
   Analytical Technique
 Time to Perform Analysis
Cost of Specialized Equipment and Reagents
Dehydrogenase Test
Total Suspended Solids
ATP bytBio»eter
Glucostat Test
Galactostat
Coulter  Counter
   Enumeration
Millipore Filter Technique
2 1/2 hrs. (1 hr. incubation
           and 30 min. color
           development)

1 1/2 hrs. (30 min. drying
           period & 30 min.
           in desiccator)

10 min. (30 min.  for enzyme
        substrate and buffer
        preparation prior to
        analysis)

1 1/2 hrs. (30 min incuba-
           tion)

3 1/2 hrs. (1-1 1/2 hrs.
           incubation)
3-4 hrs.
20 min. (16 hr. incuba-
        tion)
Parr Bomb - S678.00
2r3,5 Triphenyltetrazolium chloride -
$3.83/5g. (allows for 2500 tests)

No special equipment.
Reagents (substrate and buffer)
(allows for 500 tests)  $160
Biometer                $5,000
Glucostat reagents - $4.90/box of
5 sets of reagents (allows for 50 tests)

Galactostat reagents - $13.75/box of 5
sets of reagents  (allows for 85 tests)
Isoton (particle-free electrolyte)
$17.00/5 gal. (allows for 190 tests)

MF sterile filter paper - $15.00/box
of 100 MF sterile plastic petri dishes
S6.00/box of 100

-------
                                       TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                               (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
7" PEPORT NO.
      EPA-600/2-75-029
               3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
       ANDSUBTITLE
 MEASUREMENT  OF ACTIVE BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS IN
 BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT  PROCESSES
                                                                 5. REPORT DATE
                                                                  September  1975 (Issuing Date)
               6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
                                                                 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
  F.  G.  Pohland and  S.  J. Kang
             ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  School of  Civil Engineering
  Georgia Institute  of Technology
  Atlanta, Georgia   30332
                                                                  10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO,
                                                                  1BB043 (ROAP  21-ASR,  Task  008)
               11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                R800354
   . SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Municipal  Environmental  Research Laboratory
  Office of  Research and Development-
  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  Cincinnati.  Ohio   45268 _
                13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                Final,  1970-1974
                14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                EPA-ORD
^^SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
    ABSTRACT

    This research was initiated to determine the applicability and limitations of the dehydrogenase
    test for the measurement of active biomass in biological wastewater treatment processes.   Pure
    culture with E^ coli and/or heterogeneous culture batch studies were conducted on a variety  of
    substrates including glucose, galactose, sucrose, alanine, acetic  acid, and selected industrial
    wastewaters.  Also conducted were continuous aerobic or anaerobic  culture studies with and with-
    out solids recycle.  Dehydrogenase activity was monitored along with other parameters including
    plate  count. Coulter Counter enumeration, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and suspended solids to
    provide comparative and complementary  information on the biomass concentration.  Dehydrogenase
    activity was a very sensitive and accurate measure of active biomass throughout the growth
    phases especially during endogenous  growth but showed limitations  with the nutrient deficient
    cultures.  The correlation between dehydrogenase activity and suspended solids was constant  at
    varying retention times, or at  all growth rates with or without solids recycle.  Consequently,
    a standard curve could be developed  for given wastewaters by operating the measurement of active
    biomass and thereby effectively controlling the biological process.  The measurement of ATP  was
    also a reliable new technique  for measurement of active biomass except more study on the extrac-
    tion method is required as well as  investigations on the change of the correlation with suspended
    solids with the change of growth rate. The technique for dehydrogenase activity measurement is
    simple,  less costly and gives  more  reliable and  interpretable results. This  report was submitted
    in fulfillment of Grant No. R8003S4  (17050 GAI)  by the School of Civil Engineering, Georgia
    Institute of Technology, under partial sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.
 17.
                                    KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                     DESCRIPTORS
                                                   b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Field/Group
   *Enzymes
   *Assaying
    Activated  sludge
   *Biomass
    Process control
    Waste treatment
    Quantitative analysis
                                       13B
 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMEN1


    RELEASE TO PUBLIC
  19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
        UNCLASSIFIED
  !0. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
        UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
        153
22. PRICE
 gpA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
141
                                                                      ftUSGPO: 1975 - 657-695/5304 Region 5-11

-------