>>EPA
          United States      Industrial Environmental Research  EPA-600/7-79-112
          Environmental Protection  Laboratory          May 1979
          Agency        Research Triangle Park NC 27711
Extended Tests of Saffil
Alumina  Filter  Media

Interagency
Energy/Environment
R&D Program Report

-------
                  RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES


 Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series  These nine broad cate-
 gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
 vironmental technology. Elimination of  traditional grouping was  consciously
 planned  to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
 The nine series are:

     1. Environmental Health Effects Research

     2. Environmental Protection Technology

     3. Ecological Research

     4. Environmental Monitoring

     5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

     6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)

     7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development

    8. "Special" Reports

    9. Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the INTERAGENCY ENERGY-ENVIRONMENT
RESEARCH  AND  DEVELOPMENT series. Reports in this series result from the
effort funded under the 17-agency  Federal Energy/Environment Research and
Development Program. These studies relate to EPA's mission to protect the public
health and welfare from adverse effects of pollutants associated with energy sys-
tems. The goal of the Program is to assure the  rapid  development of domestic
energy supplies in an environmentally-compatible manner by providing the nec-
essary environmental data and control technology. Investigations include analy-
ses of the transport of energy-related pollutants  and their health and ecological
effects; assessments of, and  development of, control technologies for  energy
systems;  and integrated assessments of a wide-range of energy-related environ-
mental issues.
                        EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the participating Federal Agencies, and approved
for  publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the  views and policies of the Government, nor does mention of trade names or
commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                 EPA-600/7-79-112

                                            May 1979
Extended Tests of  Saffil
  Alumina Filter  Media
                   by

              M. A. Shackleton

             Acurex Corporation
              485 Clyde Avenue
         Mountain View, California 94042
            Contract No. 68-02-2611
                Task No. 20
          Program Element No. EHE624A
       EPA Project Officer: Dennis C. Drehmel

     Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
       Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
         Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                Prepared for

     U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        Office of Research and Development
            Washington, DC 20460

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER

       This report has been reviewed by Industrial Research Laboratory,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                     m

-------
                                  FORWARD

       New methods of using coal in energy processes are being developed.
These methods include pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) and
gasification combined cycle (GCC) processes.  These new technologies
require development of hot gas cleaning devices to remove particulates
from the process stream.  This particulate control is required to protect
equipment downstream of the combustor in the process as well as for
protection of the environment.  The economics of the process can be
improved if a single device or system can accomplish both objectives.  The
Particulate Technology Branch of the Industrial Research Laboratory has
taken a lead in development of hot gas cleaning systems through their
support of investigative work in this area.

       The work reported here is part of the EPA effort to support
development of hot gas cleaning devices.  This effort has involved an
investigation at Acurex Corporation of ceramic fibers with respect to
application in high temperature and pressure filtration.
                                    TV

-------
                                  PREFACE

       Previous work carried out under EPA Contract 68-02-2169 and
reported in EPA-600/7-78-194 examined the performance of a number of
commercially available ceramic fiber materials with respect to their
suitability for high temperature and pressure filtration.  This earlier
work demonstrated that filtration with ceramic fibers was feasible.
SAFFIL  alumina was identified as one of the most promising of the
materials currently available for application in construction of HTHP
filters.

       This report presents the results of an effort to perform 200-hour
endurance tests of filters constructed of SAFFIL alumina.  Three such
tests were completed, covering a range of filter media face velocity from
2.5 to 9 cm/sec.  Tests were performed at nominally 815°C and 10 atm
pressure using fly ash obtained from the EPA/Exxon Miniplant.  This work
was done in preparation of filter tests on a slipstream of gas from the
EPA/Exxon Miniplant.  Slipstream tests were conducted under EPA
68-02-2611, Task 25 and will be presented in a separate report.
             T M
        SAFFIL   is a registered trademark of Imperial Chemical  Industries,
Limited for inorganic fibers.

-------
                                  ABSTRACT

       This research effort was performed with the objective of developing
filter media performance data under simulated PFBC conditions for one
ceramic filter media candidate.  The media selected consisted of a  low
solidity fiber bed constructed using SAFFIL alumina ceramic fibers.

       Dust feeding tests were performed at a nominal temperature of
800°C and 10 atm pressure using reintrained fly ash which had been
collected at the EPA/Exxon Miniplant.  Tests were performed at three
filter media face velocities:  2.5, 4.8, and 9.0 cm/sec.  Each test was
performed for a duration of 200 hours.

       Pressure drop and collection efficiency were determined as a
function of time and as a function of filter face velocity.  Off-line
cleaning by reverse pulse was shown to be effective in maintaining  low
pressure drop —  <1.25 KPa after a cleaning cycle.  Collection efficiency
was high (>99.9 percent) and was maintained over the 200 hour test.
Collection efficiency was also shown to be substantially independent of
face velocity over the range tested.  Outlet concentration was less than
the most stringent requirements proposed for turbine applications
(generally 
-------
                                    CONTENTS

                                                                     Page
Forward	    iii
Preface	    iv
Abstract	    v
List of Figures	    vii
Acknowledgements  	    viii

Section
   1     INTRODUCTION  	      1
   2     SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS   	      3
   3     RECOMMENDATIONS   	      4
   4     TEST  SETUP	      5
   5     TEST  RESULTS
            5.1  Background	     10
            5.2 High Temperature/Pressure  Filtration Tests  ...     11
References	    20
                                       vii

-------
                                    FIGURES

Number                                                               Page
  1      Simplified Test Schematic 	    6
  2      Test Chamber Cross Section	    7
  3      Dust Feeder Schematic Cross Section 	    9
  4      Cumulative Dust Fed	    13
  5      Total Dust Collected Downstream 	    14
  6      Overall Collection Efficiency 	    15
  7      Average Outlet Concentration	    16
  8      Outlet Concentration as a Function of Face Velocity ...    18
  9      Collection Efficiency as a Function of Face Velocity.  .  .    19

-------
                                ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

         Much of the data for this report was collected by Mr. Chris Chancy  of
Acurex.  Mr. Robert Fulton of Acurex provided engineering support for the
tests.

         Dr. Dennis Drehmel was the EPA project officer and deserves special
thanks for his continuing interest and support which was required to see the
work through to a successful result.
                                       Tx

-------
                                 SECTION 1

                                INTRODUCTION
       The need for hot gas cleanup associated with the development of
advanced coal utilization technology, including pressurized fluidized bed
combustion (PFBC) and gasification combined cycle plants, has been
apparent for several years.  Current trends in PFBC technology development
indicate there is a continuing hope that turbines can be adequately
protected with particle removal from staged inertial separation devices.
Military experience does not support this hope.  Helicoper turbine engines
have been fitted with small, high efficiency 2.5-cm diameter cyclone tube
banks to extend service life to a moderately acceptable  level, where dust
loading is intermittent.  The U.S. Army XM-1 Main Battle Tank is turbine
powered and employs a barrier filter system with a cyclone tube bank
precleaner.  This system is capable of providing engine  intake air as
clean as that required of heavy duty diesel engines.  In the world's most
severe dust conditions (Yuma Proving Ground, Yuma, Arizona), dust  loadings
at the rear deck of a tracked vehicle are about 17 g/Nm3.  Dust loadings
in excess of this are encountered in the exhaust of the  PFBC.

       E. F. Sverdrup of the Westinghouse Research and Development Center
analytically determined the tolerance of large turbines  to particulate
loading (Reference 1).  Sverdrup's calculations indicate that cleaning  of
turbine expansion gas to a  level of 4.6 mg/Nm3 (0.002 grains/SCF)  ~
with all particles larger than 6 ym removed — is currently the best
estimated  level of cleanliness needed for turbines.  This analysis
resulted in a maximum blade erosion of 0.10 inch in  10,000 hours of
operation.  This level of cleanliness is approximately 80 times less than
the exit loading expected from three cyclones  in series.  Filtration tests
at Acurex have shown removal efficiencies resulting  in a particulate exit
loading considerably lower  than  that specified by Westinghouse.

       Nearly every type of particulate  removal device has been proposed
for HTHP application,  including  acoustic agglomerators,  molten  salt
scrubbers, varieties of cyclones, granular  beds, HTHP  electrostatic
precipitators and ceramic  filters.   Professor  E. Weber from  the University
of Essen has published  a review  paper entitled "Problems of  Gas
Purification Occurring  in  the  Use of New Technologies  for  Power
Generation"  (Reference  2).  In this  paper,  he  concludes  that gravity and
momentum force separators  will not  adequately  remove particles  from HTHP
gas streams  and  will,  therefore,  be  used only  as  precleaners.   He also
states  that  the  required degree  of  cleaning can  be achieved  using fabric

-------
filters, and points out that fibrous materials are available which can
withstand the temperatures expected in PFBC applications.

       Granular bed filters have been considered the best available option
for HTHP particulate control.  However, tests at the Exxon Miniplant have
shown that many problems remain to be solved before achieving high
efficiency and long life in these devices (Reference 3).

       Many of the particle removal devices proposed for HTHP applications
operate primarily through the mechanism of inertial impaction.  These
devices include all forms of cyclones, scrubbers and granular beds.
Because gas viscosity increases with rising temperatures, performance of
all inertial devices can be predicted to be worse at HTHP conditions than
at room ambient conditions.  Barrier filtration, on the other hand, is
unique in that a theoretical basis exists to predict improved performance
at high temperature and pressure conditions.  This improvement results
from using fine (3 ym) diameter ceramic fibers to construct the filter.
Conventional filter media usually employ fibers of 10 to 20 ym in
diameter.  The fine diameter fibers increase the filter efficiency enough
to overcome the adverse effects of increased temperature.

       In August 1976, Acurex began an EPA-sponsored program to
demonstrate the feasibility of employing available ceramic fibers in high
temperature and pressure filtration.  Under this 2-year contract the
theory of barrier filtration was examined and a wide spectrum of ceramic
papers, cloth and blanket felts were tested for filtration performance at
room ambient conditions.  A high temperature and pressure filter test rig
was built.  Promising media from room ambient tests were subjected to
accelerated cleaning tests at HTHP conditions for 50,000 cleaning pulses.
In addition, ceramic blanket materials were shown to offer the greatest
promise for further development into high temperature filter application.
During extended duration tests of 200 hours over a range of filter media
face velocity (air-to-cloth ratio), SAFFIL alumina was judged to be the
best commercially available material for filter application.

-------
                                 SECTION 2

                          SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


       Three filter elements were successfully tested for 200 hours each
in a high temperature and pressure environment (800°C, 10 atm) while
filtering injected fly ash.  The tests were performed at filter face
velocity up to 9 cm/sec.  When tested under laboratory conditions, the  low
solidity ceramic fiber media achieved high collection efficiency
(>99.9 percent), and was cleanable, maintaining a steady level of pressure
drop (<2.5 kPa).  It operated even in high dust loading conditions, and
survived the 200-hour tests without apparent mechanical degradation.

       This test series strongly supports the conclusion that available
ceramic fibers can be successfully developed into filter media for high
temperature and pressure application.

       High efficiency fine particle collection results from the use of
small fiber diameter (3 urn nominal) in the design of the filter media.
The media's ability to withstand cleaning stresses results from both fine
fiber diameter and low solidity.  The individual fibers are not held
tightly together, and because of their low mass do not exert large forces
on each other.  Filter cleaning is enhanced through the use of fine fibers
and off-line cleaning.  The high collection efficiency of the fine fibers
results in collection of particles near the surface of the media.
Off-line cleaning eliminates reintrainment of dust to the filter element
being cleaned and to neighboring elements in the filter module taken
off-line.  This feature also allows the filtration cycle to be
accomplished at high velocity because it  is reintrainment which limits
air-to-cloth ratio in currently available pulse filter systems.  The
ceramic components are not inherently expensive.  High
temperature/pressure filters will cost more than standard filters, but
primarily because of the pressure vessels, insulation requirements and  the
use of corrosion resistent alloys.  These factors are present in all the
components of a PFBC system.  Compared to the costs of these components,
the filter media cost is expected to be acceptable.

-------
                                 SECTION 3

                              RECOMMENDATIONS
       Testing of ceramic filters to date has been aimed at showing that
these materials can be used for filtration purposes.  This objective has
been accomplished and it now seems clear that a practical high temperature
filter can be developed.  Protecting gas turbines from the products of
coal combustion in a PFBC is a difficult task and Acurex recommends that
work on filtration using ceramic fiber media be resumed as quickly as
possible.  Component development, performance optimization, and
verification of long term durability all need to be addressed for HTHP
applications.

       Since ceramic filters are capable of suspending a dust cake having
a large surface area across the gas stream, this dust cake may be doped
with chemicals upstream of the filter.  These chemicals have the potential
to react with gaseous constituents in the stream and to capture or modify
them.  Thus, the high temperature filter has the potential of "dry
scrubbing" undesireable components from the gas stream, and this
capability should be fully investigated as well.

       Furthermore, a high temperature filter in atmospheric pressure
applications offers the potential of obtaining the particle collection
benefits of filtration over a wider temperature range than is presently
available.  For example, heat recovery and subsequent energy savings may
be enhanced with a high temperature filter.  The size of such a device
could be reduced because the need for dilution air will not be as great.
This capability, coupled with operation at high filter face velocity and
heat recovery, could offer fine particle control at a lower total cost
than is presently possible in other applications.  There are also many
process applications where a high temperature filter could offer savings
in energy, efficiency or product recovery.

-------
                                 SECTION 4

                                 TEST SETUP
       This section describes the test procedure used in performing the
200-hour dust feeding durability test.  An earlier report
(EPA-600/7-78-194) describes the filter media test rig.

       Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic of the test setup, and
Figure 2 provides a cross section of the filter test chamber.  The actual
piping is more complicated than shown because the test rig can also
operate in a reverse flow mode.  However, the essential flow paths are as
shown.  Primary air flow at 10 atm pressure is provided by a large
compressor.  This air is preheated by being forced through a preheater
section and injected into the bottom of the test chamber.  A second
compressor provides high pressure air for pulse cleaning and for feeding
dust into the test chamber.  Cleaning pulses are introduced through a
fast-acting solenoid valve located above the test chamber.  After passing
through the test filter, the cleaned gas flows through a heat exchanger
section to be cooled prior to the removal of any particles which have
penetrated the test filter.  These penetrating particles are collected in
the absolute filter.  A solenoid operated valve located downstream of this
point  is used to stop forward flow of the primary gas for the cleaning
cycle.  A critical orifice is used to regulate the flowrate of gas for the
test.

       Dust feeding is accomplished by using a rotary table dust feeder
mounted in a pressure vessel (see Figure 3).  The dust feeder pressure
vessel is maintained at a pressure greater than the test system pressure
(about 1250 kPa).  The exit tube for the dust feeder, located above the
table  groove, is passed through the preheater and connected to the test
chamber.  The dust injection tube is located so that dust is impacted
against a heavy metal plate below the test filter element.  This is done
in an  effort to redisperse the injected dust because excessive dust feeder
pressures are required to pass the dust through a shock.  Consequently,
redispersion of the test dust was perhaps not as good as  it could have
been in an atmospheric pressure test.

       Fly ash collected from the second stage cyclone  (Run 67) at the
EPA/Exxon Miniplant was used for all tests except those noted  in the  test
descripti9ns in Section 5.  This dust has an average particle  size
distribution of DSQ = 19 pm, which is coarser than as-generated dust.
Using  redispersed fly ash instead of as-generated fly  ash results  in
somewhat lower than expected operating pressure drop.

-------
         OCor.mressur
         D=Dryer
         R=Regulator
         S=Sulenoid operatea  valve
1700 KPa
                                                                                                   Exhaust
                                                                                                      t
                                          Small    S
                                          tank    f—|

                                          / nn
              Primary flow
                1000 KPa
                                       Induction
                                       l>reheater
•





~ T ""*""" T ""
1
i»AAj-«j»j' > > \
-------
                        Pulse In
       Plenum
      Venturl
Chamber heater
                                              A1r outlet
                                          Test media
                                           Dust feeder
                                             inlet
                                           (U4"-tube)
                                            0.635 cm
                          A1r Inlet
                        (3/4-Inch tube)
                          1,905 cm
        Figure  2.  Test chamber  cross  section.

-------
                                                                    Nominal  pressure = 1250 KPa
CO
                                    Dust
                                    hopper
                       Dry
                       compressed
                       air In
                                                                                                Table rotated with gear-motor
                                                                                                    Oust pick-up
                                                                                                               •Dust transported to
                                                                                                                test chamber
                                            Figure 3.   Dust  feeder schematic cross section.

-------
                                 SECTION 5

                                TEST RESULTS
       Section 5.1 presents a short review of theory and earlier test
results.  High temperature and pressure dust feeding test results are
presented in Section 5.2.

5.1    BACKGROUND

Filtration Theory Review

       The theory of barrier filtration has been presented in many
sources.  The method used in this program was based on work by Torgeson,
Whitby and linoya for single fibers and fiber beds (Reference 4).  The key
finding of the analysis was that low solidity fine fiber beds —
(y = 0.02),  the ratio of filter volume occupied by fibers — could be
expected to provide high filtration efficiency for fine particles; that
is, even when loosely packed, fine (3 ym) diameter ceramic fibers should
provide high efficiency filtration performance.  Results of this analysis
showed that low solidity fine fiber ceramic filters with basis weight
=500 g/m? theoretically capture 0.5 ym particles at 90 percent
efficiency (Reference 5).  The analysis also indicated that filters could
perhaps be designed to operate at a filter face velocity of up to
15 cm/sec and still maintain high efficiency.

Room Ambient Filter Media Tests

       A large number of ceramic fiber filter media candidates were
subjected to a series of filtration tests at room ambient conditions.
These tests also  included some examples of conventional filter media for
comparision purposes.  These tests included:

       •   Dioctylphtalate  (OOP) smoke penetration as a function of
           airflow  velocity

       0   Determination of maximum pore  size  (in micrometers)

       •   Measurement of permeability

       •   Flat-sheet dust  loading using  AC  fine test dust  (a standard
           0  to 80  urn classified Arizona  road  dust).  Overall  collection
           efficiency and dust  loading required to  develop  3.7  kPa
            (15 inches HgO)  pressure drop  were  determined  from this  test
           which  was operated at  10 cm/sec  (20 ft/min)  air-to-cloth ratio.

-------
       These data revealed which of the available ceramic media candidates
would most likely provide good filtration performance.  The data is
provided in detail in EPA-600/7-78-194 and has also been reported
previously (Reference 6).  A summary of findings from these tests is given
below:

       •   Several of the ceramic paper and felt materials are capable of
           removing fine particles at high efficiency without excessive
           filter weights

       •   The ceramic paper and felt materials had filtration
           characteristics and performed similarly to paper and felt
           commercial filter media in a series of filter media tests

       •   The ceramic woven materials in general were characterized by
           large pores and poor collection efficiency in the dust loading
           tests, but the parameter range exhibited by the various
           materials indicates that an acceptable woven ceramic filter
           media could probably be fabricated.  Such filter media would,
           however, have the same limitations as currently available woven
           filters — that is, acceptable performance would only occur at
           low air-to-cloth ratios

       •   "Blanket" ceramic fiber materials (felts) consisting of small
           diameter fibers (3.0 ym) appear to be the most promising
           materials for high temperature and pressure tests because they
           combine good filtration performance and relatively high strength

High Temperature/Pressure Mechanical Durability Tests

       Two major questions concerning the suitability of ceramic fibers
for HTHP filtration needed to be answered:

       1.  How durable are ceramic fiber structures when subjected to
           environmental conditions associated with filtration
           applications?
       2.  How well do ceramic fibers perform as filters in HTHP
           environment?

       Concerning the first of these questions, three ceramic filter media
configurations survived a test during which the filter elements were
subjected to 50,000 cleaning pulses.  These tests were set up to simulate
approximately a year's operation of mechanical cleaning loads on the media
at high temperature and pressure, and showed that the low solidity fine
fiber bed filters were undamaged by pulse cleaning loads.  They also
showed that the fly ash dust cake was deposited essentially on the surface
of the low solidity fine fiber bed media.  Details of these tests were
also reported earlier and in EPA-600/7-78-194.

5.2    HIGH TEMPERATURE/PRESSURE FILTRATION TESTS

       Filter performance tests were intended to simulate actual filter
operation at high temperatures and pressure for a period of 200 hours.


                                     10

-------
The filter media configuration selected as being most promising consisted
of an approximately 1-cm-th ;ck layer of SAFTIL alumina mat insulation
material.  This ceramic material  was contained between two layers of knit
304 stainless steel screen.  The stainless steel screen was suitable for
these relatively short tests, but would probably not survive long term
exposure to the PFBC environment.  However, we have fabricated similar
filter elements, substituting the stainless steel screen with a ceramic
screen made using a leno weave.  The ceramic screen and media filter
elements have not yet been  tested, but we are confident they will be
satisfactory.

       Three 200-hour tests were attempted and completed.  The tests were
performed at a media face  velocity of 2.5 cm/sec (5 ft/min), 9 cm/sec
(18 ft/min) and 4.8 cm/sec  (9.5 ft/miri), and were performed in that order.

       The first 200-hour  test was performed at a nominal air-to-cloth
ratio of 5 to 1 (2.54 cm/sec).  Pulse duration was 150 msec.  Pulse
interval was one cleaning  cycle every 10 minutes.  Pulse pressure was
1100 kPa.  Cleaning was performed "off-line" with a 4-second bleed down
followed by reverse flow for 2 seconds; the pulse superimposed followed  by
a 2-second settling period  prior to continuing the filtration cycle.  We
now feel that the reverse  flow portion of the cleaning cycle  is
unnecessary and that off-line pulse cleaning will be  sufficient.

       Exxon Miniplant fly ash was used as the test dust.  A fine dust,
DSQ = 4 um, was used for the first 75 hours.  When this dust was no
longer available, a coarse sample, 050 = 19 urn, was used for the
remainder of the test.

       Cumulative dust fed,  total dust collected downstream, and overall
collection efficiency by mass  are plotted as  function of time on
Figures 4, 5, and 6.  The  inlet  concentration for this test was high,
having an overall average  of 14.4 g/Nm3.  Shortly after  the fine dust
was substituted with the coarse, overall efficiency was  reduced and the
rate of penetration  in weight  per unit time was  increased.  At  about
120 hours and again  at 150 hours  into the  test, the rate of dust feeding
was reduced.  The rate of  penetration seemed  to follow this.  These
occurrences were consistent with  leakage through a defect mechanism  in  the
media.  Visual  examination of  the  inside  surface of media  after the  test
revealed  it to  be basically clean with  some  localized staining.  Overall
collection efficiency remained high  throughout  the test, never  falling
below 99.964 percent.

       Outlet concentration as  a function  of  time  is  shown  on  Figure  7.
These results are  lower  on a mass  basis  than  turbine  requirements  as
reported  by Sverdrup  in  EPA 600/9-78-004.   The  outlet concentrations for
this first test were  based on  a  flow of  0.566 Mm3  per minute  during the
200 hours that  dust  was  being  fed.   They do not  include  the additional
flow occurring  during  warmup and cooldown  when  the  dust  feeder was off.
Because of various  test  rig difficulties,  this  first  run was interrupted
many times.  Pressure  drop was maintained at  <0.75  kPa (3 inches H?0)
throughout the  test.
                                      11

-------
   100
S»  80
Q
    60
    40
    20
     0
              Exxon  mini pi ant  fly ash
              air-to-cloth  ratio:
             ©  2.5 cm/sec
                 4.8 cm/sec
                 9.0 cm/sec
                  50
  100         150
Time - hours
 i
200
                 Figure 4.  Cumulative dust fed.
                                  12

-------
 Exxon  miniplant  fly  ash
 air-to-cloth  ratio:
©2.5  cm/sec
^4.8  cm/sec
B 9.0  cm/sec
                                                \
 Figure 5.   Total  dust collected downstream.
                        13

-------
               Exxon mi nip!ant fly ash
               air-to-cloth ratio:

               0 2.5 cm/sec

               ^ 4.8 cm/sec

               GJ 9.0 cm/sec
                                                                     (4
                                                                     Ws
                                                                     CD
 O

 O)
 O.
 O
 c
 0)
•r-
 u
0)
•I-  CO
O (O
O) E
O
      100
99.99
       99.98
99.97
       99.96-
                       _L
                       50   '       100         150

                              Time -- hours
                                                     200
                  Figure 6.  Overall  collection efficiency.
                                      14

-------
   Exxon  mini pi ant  fly ash
   air-to-cloth  ratio

  0 2.5  cm/sec

     4.8  cm/sec

     9.0  cm/sec
                                     ft
61-
             50
     100          150          200

Time — hours
         Figure  7.   Average  outlet concentration.
                               15

-------
       Subsequent test results showed lower outlet concentrations  and  led
us to believe that the test filter used in the first test had a  leak.

       The second 200-hour test attempted to achieve the highest
air-to-cloth ratio possible using the present test rig configuration.
This test was performed at a filter media face velocity (air-to-cloth
ratio) of 9 cm/sec (18 ft/min).  Because of compressor limitations  it  was
only possible to maintain a system pressure of 500 kPa.  Earlier tests
were performed at system pressures of 930 kPa.  Cleaning pulse pressure
was set at 860 kPa to compensate for the reduced system pressure.
Cleaning cycle pulse duration and pulse interval were the same as  in the
previous test at 2.5 cm/sec with both tests using offline cleaning.

       As before, fly ash from the Exxon Miniplant was used as the  test
dust.  This dust had a 050 = 19 ym.  Cumulative dust fed, total  dust
collected downstream and overall collection efficiency are plotted  as  a
function of time on Figures 4, 5, and 6.  Outlet concentration as  a
function of time is shown in Figure 7.  Overall collection efficiency  for
200 hours was 99.992 percent.  The filter, which has only 0.146 m2
(1.5 ft2) of filter media area, removed 43,772 g (96.5 Ib) of dust  from
16,887 Mm3 of air.  Average inlet concentration was 2.59 g/Nm3 and
average outlet concentration for 200 hours was 0.2 mg/Nm3.  Thus,  on a
mass basis the outlet concentration is cleaner than projected turbine
requirements.  Pressure drop varied from about 0.5 kPa to 2.25 kPa  (2  to 9
in H£0) over the 10-minute cycle between cleaning events.

       The third 200-hour test was performed at an intermediate
air-to-cloth ratio of 4.8 cm/sec (9.5 ft/min).  For this test, as  for  the
higher velocity test, compressor limitations required that system  pressure
be set at 660 kPa.  Cleaning pulse pressure was 1100 kPa.  Other aspects
of the cleaning cycle were the same as in the previous tests.  The  same
dust was used (050 = 19 ym).  Cumulative dust fed, total dust collected
downstream, and overall collection efficiency by mass are plotted  as a
function of time on Figures 4, 5, and 6.  Outlet concentration as  a
function of time is plotted on Figure 7.  Cleaned down pressure  drop was
maintained at less than 1.25 kPa (5 inches H20) throughout the test.

       Outlet concentration as a function of face velocity (air-to-cloth
ratio) is plotted on Figure 8 for three time periods of 50, 100  and
200 hours.  If we assume the filter used in the first test at 2.5  cm/sec
developed a leak and extrapolate expected performance (dotted lines),  it
is apparent that outlet concentration is reduced as a function of  time at
all velocities.  This result is similar to what one would expect from  a
test using conventional filter media in a room ambient dust feeding test.

       Overall particle collection efficiency is plotted as a function of
face velocity (air-to-cloth ratio) on Figure 9 for three time periods  of
50, 100 and 200 hours.  Again, if the two discrepant data points are
ignored, collection efficiency is substantially independent of face
velocity in the range tested.  This is consistent with a hypothesis which
holds that filter penetration occurs primarily during cleaning.  The
filter was cleaned at zero forward flow in all three tests (off-line).
                                     16

-------
                50 hours

               100 hours

               200 hours
                    Filter fice velocity cm/sec
                    (a1r-to-cloth ratio)
Figure 8.   Outlet concentration as a function of face velocity.
                                17

-------
                   50 hours

                 O100 hours

                 ^200 hours
c
OJ
o

0)
o.
o
c
QJ
(U

C
o^
•I- (/)
-t-> V)
U ID
        100
99.99
       99.98
99.97
       99.96
                                468

                         Filter face velocity  cm/sec
                         (air-to-cloth ratio)
                                                      10
    Figure 9.   Collection efficiency as  a  function of face velocity.
                                       18

-------
                                 REFERENCES

1.  Sverdrup, E. F., 0. H. Archer, and M. Menguturk.  "The Tolerance of
    Large Gas Turbines to 'Rocks,' 'Dusts,' and Chemical Corrodants."
    EPA-600/9-78-004, CONF-770970, March 1978, pp. 14-32.

2.  Weber, E.  "Problems of Gas Purification Occurring in the Use of New
    Technologies for Power Generation."  EPA-600/9-78-004, CONF-770970,
    March 1978, pp. 249-277.

3.  Hoke, R. C., and M. W. Gregory.  "Evaluation of a Granular Bed Filter
    for Particulate Control in Fluidized Bed Combustion."
    EPA-600/9-78-004, CONF-770970, March 1978, pp. 111-131.

4.  Calvert, S., "Wet Scrubber Systems Study, Vol. I," EPA-R2-72-118a,
    NTIS-PB213016.

5.  Shackleton, M., and J. Kennedy, "Ceramic Fabric Filtration at High
    Temperatures and Pressures," EPA-600/9-78-004, CONF-770970,
    March 1978, pp. 193-234.

6.  Orehmel, D.C., and M. Shackleton, "High-Temperature Filtration,
    Proceedings of Third Symposium on Fabric Filters for Particle
    Collection," Tucson, Arizona, EPA sponsored, December 1977.
                                     19

-------
                                TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/7-79-112
                                                      3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Extended Tests of Saffil Alumina Filter Media
            5. REPORT DATE
             May 1979
                                                      6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOH(S)
                                                      8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 M.A.  Shackleton
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Acurex Corporation
485 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, California 94042
            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
            E HE 62 4 A
            11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

            68-02-2611, Task 20
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 EPA, Office of Research and Development
 Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
            Task Final; 2/78 - 2/79
            14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
             EPA/600/13
 15.SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES IERL-RTP project officer is  Dennis C. Drehmel, Mail Drop 61
 919/541-2925.                                                               P   '
 16. ABSTRACT
           The report gives results of research aimed at developing filter media
 performance data under simulated pressurized fluidized-bed combustion conditions
 for one ceramic filter media candidate. A low-solidity fiber bed, using Saffil alu-
 mina ceramic filters was  selected. Dust feeding was tested at a nominal 800 C and
 10 atm pressure, using  reentrained fly ash which had been collected at the EPA/Ex-
 xon Miniplant. Tests were performed at three filter media face  velocities: 2.5, 4. 8,
 and 9.0 cm/sec.  Each test was 200 hours long.  Pressure drop and collection effi-
 ciency were determined as functions of time and filter face velocity. Off-line clean-
 ing by reverse  pulse was  effective in maintaining low pressure drop (<1.25 kPa)
 after a cleaning cycle. Collection efficiency was high O99. 9 percent) and was main-
 tained over the  200 hour test. Collection efficiency was also substantially indepen-
 dent of face  velocity over  the range tested. Outlet concentration was less than the
 most stringent requirements proposed for turbine applications (generally <1 mg/cu
 Nm). Outlet concentration showed a trend toward lower values at higher filtration
 velocity.  Mechanical durability was indicated in that none of the test filters appeared
 to have been damaged by the 200-hour tests with cleaning at 10-minute intervals.
17.
                             KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                DESCRIPTORS
                                          b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                          COSATI Field/Group
 Pollution             Dust
 Filtration            Fly Ash
 Combustion           Gas Turbines
 Fluidized Bed Processors
 Aluminum Oxide
 Ceramic Fibers
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Saffil Fibers
Particulate
                         13B
                         07D
                         21B
                         07A
                         07B
11G

13G
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

 Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified	
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
                         21. NO. OF PAGES
                             27
                                                                   22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                         20

-------