EPA-600/2-78-055
March 1978
Environmental Protection Technology Series
OF A KIT FOR DETECTING
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SPILLS IN WATERWAYS
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
NOLOGY series. This series describes research performed to develop and dem-
onstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent en-
vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources'of pollution. This work
provides the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/2-78-055
March 1978
DEVELOPMENT OF A KIT FOR DETECTING- HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL SPILLS IN WATERWAYS
by
A. Silvestrl, A. Goodman, L. M. McConnack,
M. Razulis, A. R. Jones, Jr., and M. E. P. Davis
Chemical Systems Laboratory
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010
EPA-IAG-0546
Project Officer
Joseph P. Lafornara
Oil and Hazardous Material Spills Branch
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory - Cincinnati
Edison, New Jersey 08817
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory-Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved
for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
ii
-------
FOREWORD
When energy and material resources are extracted, processed, converted, and
used, the related pollutional Impacts on our environment and even on our health
often require that new and increasingly more efficient pollution control methods
be used. The Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory - Cincinnati (lERL-Ci)
assists in developing and demonstrating new and improved methodologies that will
meet these needs both efficiently and economically.
This report is a product of the above efforts. It documents the laboratory and
field studies conducted in the development of a field kit for detecting spills of
hazardous materials in watercourses. The kit, consisting of 15 different chemical
tests packaged in a one-man portable configuration is capable of detecting a wide
variety of polluting substances in water.
This report should be of value to Federal, state and local government personnel
as well as to individuals from the chemical process and transportation industries
who are involved in responding to accidental releases of hazardous substances.
Information on this subject beyond that supplied in the report may be obtained from
the Oil and Hazardous Materials Spills Branch (IERL), Edison, New Jersey 08817.
David G. Stephan
Director
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Cincinnati
in
-------
ABSTRACT
Chemical Systems Laboratory, under a program sponsored by the Environmental
Protection Agency, Edison, NJ has developed a kit to detect hazardous material spills
into waterways. The purpose of the program was to develop a man-portable field kit
able to detect (not necessarily identify) as many contaminants in water in as low a
concentration as possible.
A list of compounds, representative of potential contaminants, was used to
evaluate commercial, military and specially designed procedares which have applica-
tion to water testing. Following the original screening, promising methods were
further evaluated against samples of natural waters polluted in the laboratory with
compounds from the model list. It was concluded that a selection of 15 multiple
non-specific detection systems could be organized into a detection concept which
would detect a significant portion of potential contaminants. A "paper analysis"
projected that about 85% of potential contaminants would respond to at least one
detection parameter.
A field kit was designed containing a spectrophotometer, conductivity meter,
pH meter and a variety of accessory equipment and reagents. Prototype kits were
fabricated and delivered to Environmental Protection Agency along with engineering
drawings, parts lists and manuals.
IV
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword iii
Abstract iv
Figures vi
Tables vii
Acknowledgment viii
1. Introduction 1
2. Conclusions 4
3. Recommendations 5
4. Experimental Studies 7
5. Formulation of Detection Concept 28
References 36
List of Manufacturers and Suppliers 37
Appendices
A. Probable Responses of Detector Kit to Materials Listed in Federal
Register 38
B. Operator's Manual for Hazardous Materials Detector Kit 52
1. Introduction 52
2. Concept of Use 53
3. Equipment and Methodology 56
4. Analytical Procedures 66
5. Consumable Materials 76
References 79
-------
FIGURES
Number PaSe
1 Hazardous Material Detector Kit 3^
2 Hazardous Materials Detector Kit In Use 35
VI
-------
TAB1ES
Number Page
1 Model List of Hazardous Materials 8
2 Detection Systems for Hazardous Materials 22
3 Detection of Contaminants In Water From Winter's Run 23
4 Detection of Contaminants In Water From Big Gunpowder Falls 24
5 Detection of Contaminants In Water From Susquehanna River 25
6 Background of Natural Waters of North Central Maryland 27
7 Summary of Methods Selected for Detector Kit 29
8 Probability of Detection of Water Contaminants 30
Vll
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Appreciation is given to:
Mr. Robert Gamson who helped establish this project and assisted in the
preparation of the original proposal.
Mr. James Tarbox who prepared the engineering drawings for the specially
fabricated detector kit components.
Summer students who participated in the program, Ms. Sandy Gordon, and Michelle
Hackley in the summer of 1974 and Mr. lorn Kronau in the summer of 1975.
Personnel of Chemical Detection and Alarms Branch who typed the report.
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Chemical Systems Laboratory, under the sponsorship of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Oil and Hazardous Materials Spills Branch,
Industrial Environmental Research Lab, Edison, NJ, developed a field
kit to detect (not necessarily identify) hazardous material spills
into inland waterways. Development was implemented by surveying
reported procedures, making original studies and evaluating Army and
industrial equipment which could be used for detection of contaminants
in water. Using a model list of contaminants, procedures were then
selected to give a total detection concept. Finally, necessary instru-
ments and equipment to adapt the procedures to field use were chosen
and designed into a man-portable kit. Two prototype kits were fabri-
cated for EPA complete with drawings, manuals and parts lists.
BACKGROUND
Every year in the United States there are over 3,000 spills of
hazardous polluting materials (other than oil) into waterways. These
include in-plant and storage spills, as well as spills caused during
transportation of materials by barge, tank truck, railway tank car and
pipeline. In addition, agricultural use of chemicals and run-off of
natural waters deposit large amounts of materials into rivers, streams
and lakes. The materials, many of which of which are hazardous to public
health and wildlife, include alcohols, pesticides, phosphates, nitrates,
sulfates and a variety of other industrial organic and inorganic chemicals.
With the number of incidents increasing every year, an urgent need exists
for a simple man-portable field kit capable of detecting contaminants in
waterways.
At the present time EPA is concerned with detection of about 370
hazardous materials published in the Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 250
of 30 December 1975.
A number of specific points were considered during development:
1. In most cases the nature of the spill will be known; it will be
necessary to detect its "plume" down the waterway until countermeasures
can be taken or the contamination disappears. Non-specific detection
methods which are generally responsive to multiple contaminants and can
be related to concentration are needed. High sensitivity (while desirable)
is not always the most important criteria in tracing a "plume". Lengthy
procedures are to be avoided since a large number of repetitive tests at
short intervals will be required.
-------
2. The kit will frequently be used from a small boat rather than
shore. Therefore, techniques requiring complex equipment or open heat
are unsuitable.
3. Methods requiring little or no makeup reagents are preferred,
to reduce the size of the kit and the logistical burden.
4. EPA prefers shelf-available instrumentation, equipment and
prepackaged reagents, since they have a limited staff and propose to
maintain the kits themselves.
APPROACH
It was proposed to develop a total detection concept using a selection
of non-specific tests with a broad detection response for as many contami-
nants as possible.
It was decided to make the kit as versatile as possible so that it
could be modified or added to as requirements change.
The large number of materials of concern to EPA made it necessary to
develop a model list of contaminants for evaluation studies. It was agreed
to use findings from this evaluation for a "paper analysis1' (Appendix A) to
indicate the probability of detection of other materials from the Federal
Register list.
A first estimate of-detection capabilities for the field was made from
standard references ' ' ' . Literature was obtained from water test kit
suppliers and a review was made of Army equipment and devices which could
be applied to detection of contamination in water. It was immediately
evident that tests for inorganic components are x^ell established, and in
many cases prepackaged reagent systems are available. Tests for organic
materials are comparatively few, and often are not simple nor do they
lend themselves to repetitive use. This area required the most new
development work.
To reduce the need for refill and special reagents, enphasis was
placed on instrumental methods. These included pH meters, conductivity
meters, ultraviolet light methods, colorimeters and ion-selective
electrodes. This approach requires a power supply, but the advantages
easily outweigh the inconvenience.
In reviewing methods or instruments to be used in the kit, a
comprehensive survey of all available selections was not made. When
possible, several choices were compared, then the most reliable and/or
one most easily worked into a detection concept was selected. Thus, on
finding a reliable pH meter, phosphate test or detector tube, that search
ended and other detection requirements x^ere addressed.
-------
Because of the low solubility of many of the materials, concentration
techniques were also studied.
Detection of contaminants in natural waters is complicated by the
fact many interfering ions and materials are present as background
components. If the contaminant is a natural component of water (e.g.
sulfate ion) it is necessary to detect its presence by a gain over
background. This can be done by comparing the contaminated water with
a reference sample. A reference sample is taken at a point upstream
from the contaminated area, or in the case of a lake or a pond, at an
area removed from the spill area. Once a reference is established, the
"plume" is traced by the change in water quality.
The program used to develop a detector kit for hazardous material
spills is outlined below:
PROGRAM
PHASE I. A. Select model list of contaminants.
B. Evaluate commercial, military and specially designed tests,
PHASE II. A. Evaluate selected methods against contaminants in natural
waters.
B. Survey background level of natural waters with candidate
methods.
C. Select methods and formulate concept.
D. Prepare "paper analysis" of Federal Register listing.
PHASE III. A. Fabricate kits, draft manual.
B. Conduct fieldability tests.
C. Finalize manual, prepare drawings and parts lists.
D. Prepare final report.
-------
SECTION 2
CONCLUSIONS
Chemical Systems Laboratory personnel have developed a field kit for
detection of hazardous material spills into inland waters. Prototypes
have been prepared and provided to EPA along with manuals, parts lists and
drawings. While the kit is not a panacea for all spill situations, in
the hands of a dedicated investigator its instrumentation and chemistry
can provide a variety of valuable data which will help him accomplish many
of his tasks.
The makeup of the kit is simple enough so modifications may be made
to suit particular needs and applications. In fact, as information on its
performance is received from the field, changes may be made to the detection
concept itself.
This program is a start in assessing the overall nature of contamination
and the problems associated with its detection. Areas of detection weaknesses
and suggested leads for continued investigations are noted in Section 3.
-------
SECTION 3
RECOMMENDATIONS
The hazardous materials detector kit concept has excellent potential
for detection of contamination in inland waters. The kit is versatile and
easily modified for special applications.
It is apparent that a number of gaps exist in the detection systems,
particularly for many organic compounds. This further reflects the limited
capability of commercial kits in dealing with organic contamination in
water. The detection gaps found in the "paper analysis" reflect the same
shortcomings.
Certain areas showing promise but not brought to conclusion within the
time frame of this program, are felt to be worthy of continued study.
a) Methods using open cell polyurethane cubes impregnated with
chromogenlc reagents and prepackaged in plastic tubes are promising. One
of the processes developed, used urethane cubes loaded with dithizone to
detect heavy metals. Stability problems which were not resolved prevented
their inclusion in the detector kit. Use of anti-oxidants such as ascorbic
acid may be of value in stabilizing them. Similar devices employing the
4-aminoantipyrene reagent for phenol were prepared. However, time was not
available at the end of the program to determine their stability.
b) Compounds known as fluorescent probes are promising detectors for
high molecular weight organic materials. This system would be especially
useful because it is unrelated to other detection methods and would add a
new dimension to the detector kit. The problem to be resolved is one of
developing simple universal extraction and concentration techniques.
c) Methods using silver salts to detect organochlorine materials
would be useful since a significant number of these compounds are listed
as hazards in the Federal Register. The problem again, is with extraction
and concentration techniques.
d) It is evident from the above that continued studies in the area of
extraction and concentration techniques would be of general overall applica-
tion to detection of contaminants in water.
e) Enzyme systems, similar to that included in the kit may be
designed to more specifically respond to insecticides and other industrial
contaminants.
-------
f) Certain detector tubes were not considered for use in the
effervescent process developed for the detector kit because they do not
have multiple response capability; this doesn't preclude their evaluation
and use for specific contaminants.
Finally, the kit is simple and versatile in makeup so that modifications
may easily be made. In fact, Anderson Laboratories Corporation, Fort Worth,
TX, carries all the reagents necessary to perform tests in the 13th Edition
of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water, many of which are poten-
tially adaptable to the kit.
-------
SECTION 4
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
MODEL LIST OF CONTAMINANTS
As Indicated, the large number of materials of concern to EPA made it
necessary to develop a model list of contaminants for evaluation studies.
Included were the most important materials from a hazards standpoint-" and
others representative of the complete list. The materials selected are
shown in Table 1 .
Solutions for evaluation of candidate detection methods were prepared
by mixing a one gram sample of the contaminant in one liter of water. When
the contaminant is totally soluble, the concentration of the initial solution
is 1000 mg/1; for highly insoluble compounds, the concentration of the initial
solution is assumed to be that of a saturated solution as reported in the
literature. Three additional dilutions of 1:10, 1:100 and 1:1000 were made
from the clear supernatant liquid and the concentrations were calculated from
the saturation values.
Candidate tests were first screened against the highest concentration
of contaminant. When a positive response was noted, lower concentrations
were further tested until a negative response was obtained or all four
concentrations were tested. Detection tests were applied to all solutions,
regardless of whether a response was expected. In this manner, many cross-
interferences were observed which were useful in a multiple response capa-
bility concept.
EVALUATION OF METHODS
Methods are grouped by the process used or the chemical or physical
measurement made. Sections are cross-referenced where approriate.
Preparations and testing of the contaminant solutions have been described
in Section 4 .
Reasons for inclusion or rejection of individual tests are discussed.
Response of the tests selected for the kit, to the model list of contam-
inants is shown in Table 2. Information on the selected methods is sum-
marized in Section 5^ Detailed procedures for each test are given in the
Operator's Manual prepared for the kit (Appendix B).
-------
Table 1
Model List of Hazardous Materials
(Concentration of Initial Solution)
Hazardous Substance
1. Phenol
2. Methanol
3. Acrylonitrile
4. Chlorosulfonic Acid
5. Benzene
6. Ammonium Chloride
7. Phosphorus Pentasulfide
8. Styrene
9. Acetone Cyanohydrin
10. Calcium Hypochlorite
11. Nonylphenol
12. Isoprene
13. Xylenes
14. Nitrophenol
15. Ammonium Nitrate
16. Aluminum Sulfate
17. Aldrin
mg/1
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
660
1000
1000
17
100
130
1000
1000
1000
0.2
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Hazardous Substance mg/1
Toxaphene 3
DDT 0.005
EPN 500
Malathion 145
Parathion 25
Dieldrin 0.25
Heptachlor 0.2
Sevin 40
Chlordane 0.1
Fermate 120 .
Lead Arsenate 2.5
Disodium Methyl Arsenate 1000
Phenyl Mercuric Chloride 6.9
2,4-D (Acid) 900
2,4,5-T (Acid) 280 :
Ammonium Phosphate,Dibasic 1000
-------
Certain detection approaches recur in this evaluation. For example,
quantitative measurements were made using color comparators, the Hach
Chemical Company DR Colorimeter and the Hach DP EL/2 Spectrophotometer.
Color comparators require visual matching of developed colors with a
series of permanent glass or plastic standards. The process is highly
subjective and under some conditions may only be semiquantitative. Since
accurate quantitative measurement is necessary for many situations, an
instrumental method is preferred.
The Kach DR Colorimeter is a portable battery-operated filter
colorimeter. The Hach Spectrophotometer, which is also portable and bat-
tery operated (Appendix B, p. 9) has a simple variable filter calibrated
in nanometers which precludes the need to change filters for different
analyses.
Hach liquid reagents are packaged with calibrated dropping pipettes.
Dry reagents are packaged with automatic measuring devices or in individ-
ually sealed plastic tubes which are opened with clips to obtain the
reagent.
The tests evaluated in this investigation are summarized below:
a. Acidity. Acidity was determined in the conventional manner by
titration with 0.02N NaOH to a phenolphthalein endpoint^ . The "drop-
count" titration method was used to simplify handling for the field. It
was found that acidity data parallels data obtained with a pH meter. A
pH meter is preferred for simplicity of use, reliability of data and use
of fewer chemicals; the acidity test was rejected.
b. Alcohol. Chemical tests for methyl alcohol in water based on
cerric ammonium nitrate and vanadium oxinate were investigated but did
not respond at the 1000 mg/1 level. Other alcohol tests based on enzymatic
methods are described under Enzyme Systems (Section m). Several tests
using detector tubes are discussed under Detector Tubes (Section 1). An
alcohol test as such was not used.
c. Alkalinity. Alkalinity was measured by titration with 0.02N
H SO to a mixed bromcresol green-methyl red endpoint using the "drop-
count" titration method. Reasons for its rejection are the same as for
the Acidity test (Section a).
d. Ammonia Nitrogen. The Ammonia Nitrogen Tester, Model NI-8,
marketed by the Hach Chemical Company was evaluated. The kit uses the
Nessler reagent to develop color which is measured by comparison to
colored standards. Use of comparators for the kit was considered too
subjective for quantitative analysis, particularly under variable light
conditions. The same procedure using either a colorimeter or Spectro-
photometer is preferred. See data Table 2 and procedure (Appendix B,
p. 21). The test responds to a wide range of organic and inorganic com-
pounds.
-------
Other compounds, which responded to the Messier reagent at 100 mg/1
or less are chloramine-T, dichloroamine-T, dicyclohexylamine, 2,4-dinitro-
phenylamine, 2-ethylhexylamine, hexamethylenimine, N--raethylglucamine, 2-
nitrodiphenylamine, uric acid and m-xylenediamine.
A positive response with the Messier reagent is indicated by formation
of a yellow color or a precipitate.
e. Chloride. Commercial tests for chloride lack sensitivity or require
titration making them-unsuitable for the kit. The. test adopted is modified
from the literature ' and detects, in addition, a wide range of inorganic
components such as iodides, bromides, cyanides, sulfides, thiosulfates, and
nitrates. Chloride in water is determined by the red complex formed by the
addition of ferric ion and mercuric thiocyanate. Use of the procedure with a
spectrophotometer is described in Appendix B, p. 21.
The reagents are prepared as follows:
1. Mercuric Thiocyanate. Dissolve 0.3 gm in 100 ml methanol. Allow
to stand 24 hours, filter.
2. Ferric Ion Solution. Dissolve 5 gm of ferrous ammonium sulfate,
Fe(NH ) (SO ) ,6H , 1^,20 ml distilled water, add 38 ml cone KNO-;
boil to oxidize to Fe and drive off oxides of nitrogen. Hake up to
100 ml.
R.eagents for kit application, stored in polyethylene bottles, were
unstable. Stored in glass bottles the reagents were stable; at room
temperature they have been stable for over seven months. Data with this
procedure are shown in Table 2 .
Kitagawa recently introduced a detector tube for chloride in water.
In use the ends are snapped off the tube which is made to stand in a
shallow depth of water. As water chromatographs up the tube by capillary
action, a colored stain separates in the presence of chloride. The item
was found insensitive and data too difficult to reproduce for quantitative
work.
f. Chlorinated Compounds. Many chlorinated pesticides are detected
in thin-layer chromatography by spraying them with solutions of silver
nitrate or silver acetate. Following irradiation with shortwave ultra-
violet light, the compounds are seen as gray to black spots ' ' In this
study 5 ug quantities of a group of contaminants in chloroform were spotted
on silica gel plates, the plates sprayed with 1" aqueous silver nitrate,
and then irradiated for five minutes with shortwave ultraviolet light.
Many compounds are seen as black, gray or yellow spots.
10
-------
Detection of Chlorinated Compounds
With Silver Nitrate
Hazardous Materials Response
17. Aldrin +
18. Toxaphene +
19. DDT +
20. EPN
21. Malathion +
22. Parathion
23. Dieldrin +
24. Heptachlor +
25. Sevin +
26. Chlordane +
32. 2,4-D (Acid)
33. 2,4,5-T (Acid)
A variation of this process uses bromcresol green in the silver salt
reagent . While variations were noted in the colors developed, there was
no substantial improvement in detection capability.
Several obstacles prevent use of this method in the kit concept. Many of
the relevant materials have an extremely low solubility in water; to obtain
enough material for testing, extraction and concentration techniques are
required. It was postulated that sufficient material could be recovered
from water by shaking a 50 ml sample with 1 ml of chloroform and spotting
the chloroform extracts on silica gel plates for testing. However, the
poor reproducibility of extraction techniques and the complexity of
operations were discouraging.
Another obstacle was the high energy requirement for the ultraviolet
light. Five minute on-times periods for the ultraviolet light are
excessive requirements for a power supply in the proposed field kit. The
procedure was abandoned.
g. Chlorine. The Hach Free and Total Chlorine Test Kit, Model CN-66
was evaluated. The test initially appeared to have a multiple detection
response. On reexamination, it was found that the readout, made with a
comparator, depended on a poorly compensated reagent blank. When the
tests were rerun with the colorimeter, only calcium hypochlorite gave a
useful detection response.
0-Toliver (Hach Ho. 141), a reagent for total chlorine gave no response
to the model list of contaminants and the reagent was dropped.
h. Color. Color in water was measured satisfactorily using either the
colorimeter or spectrophotometer. See the data in Table 2 and procedure
in Appendix B, p. 19.
11
-------
i. Conductivity. A battery-operated conductivity meter, Type 70 Meter,
marketed by Chemtrix, Inc., was evaluated and found generally satisfactory.
The conductivity meter in the Hach DR-EL/2 kit was also tested. Results
with the Hach instrument were more reproducible because it was less sensitive
to the depth of immersion or motion of the probe. Data with the model list
of contaminants is shown in Table 2 and the procedure is given in Appendix
B, p. 18.
j. Cyanide. Detection of cyanide was studied using the Rach Cyanide
Test Kit, Model CYN-3 which uses a comparator. The same reagents can be
used to run the test with the colorimeter or spectrophotometer. The pro-
cedure is undesirable because it requires four individual reagents and has
a 26 minute development time. Although, the test is sensitive to less than
0.01 mg/1 cyanide it did not respond to a wide range of contaminants.
A recently marketed detector tube for cyanide ion in water (Kitagawa)
was tested. In use the ends of the tube are snapped off and the tube made
to stand in a shallow depth of water. Water rising up the tube by capillary
action will elute a blue stain In the presence of cyanide. Other contami-
nants can elute tan to grayish colored stains. See the data in Table II and
the procedure in Appendix B, p. 10 and 17. The procedure is sensitive to
5 mg/1 as CN .
k. Detector Papers. This section is addressed to papers for detection
of liquid chemical agents. (Papers impregnated with chemicals for determining
pH or the presence of hardness are covered under appropriate, sections). The
Army uses papers impregnated with various dyes to detect liquid chemical
agents in the field. Fine aerosols of the agents, on impact with the papers,
dissolve a portion of the dye leaving a noticeable colored stain. The possi-
bility of detecting organics immiscible with water using such papers was
investigated. Solutions of the model list of contaminants (1000 mg/1) were
shaken vigorously and spotted by pipette to 118 paper (a standard detector for
liquid agent), and LAD SIN-55 and LAD SIN-26 (two advanced types of detector
papers). Only nonylphenol produced noticeable red stains with the papers.
No response was obtained at the 100 mg/1 level. The application of the
papers is too narrow for use in the kit.
1. Detector Tubes. Detector tubes are commonly used in industry to
detect airborne contamination. Indeed, the Army relies heavily on these
items to detect gaseous chemical agents. Detector tubes consist of a
narrow glass tube containing an adsorbent, usually silica gel, held in
place by porous retainers. When air is drawn through the tubes contaminants
are visualized by colored reactions with chemicals impregnated on the silica
gel or by drops of added reagents.
Since many of the contaminants have significant vapor pressures, an
attempt at detection was made by sampling the vapors, from flasks containing
1000 mg/1 concentrations of contaminants using a Bendix/Gastec benzene
analyzer tube. A discoloration of the silica gel was sometimes observed,
12
-------
indicative of a positive test. This finding was significant for three
reasons: 1) Use of a detector designed to operate in one environment—
air was extended to function in another—water. 2) This procedure
detects some normally non-reactive organics in water, an area of signif-
icant weakness. 3) A large number of detector tubes for organic contami-
nants are readily available from many suppliers. These would constitute
prepackaged detection systems equivalent to those available for inorganic
contaminants.
The next effort of the investigation was to devise a means of enhancing
sensitivity. One method attempted, used detector tubes to sample air which
had been bubbled through the water sample to scrub out the contaminant. No
significant improvement in sensitivity was found.
A convenient and effective approach made use of effervescent materials
(such as Alka-SeltzerR tablets) to scrub out the contaminant. In the
process devised, a tablet is added to an 80 ml water sample contained
in a widemouth jar. The cap, fitted with tygon tubing holding a
detector kit in line is quickly screwed onto the jar. Effervescence
forces the gases through the detector tube where contamination may be
visualized. This procedure gave a ten-fold increase in sensitivity com-
pared to methods in which the gases were sampled from the mouth of the
flask or air was bubbled through the sample.
Findings from this study show that two basic tubes were adaptable to
this process and in addition had multiple detection capabilities. One is
the iodine pentoxide tube, of which, Bendix/Gastec benzene (No. 121) and
toluene (No. 122) tubes are examples, and the other is the potassium
dichromate tube, of which, Bendix/Gastec acetone (No. 151), ethyl acetate
(Mo. 141) and cyclohexane (No. 103) tubes are examples. See the data
(Table 2 ) and Appendix B, p. 10 and 16 for use of the benzene tube. The
tube also responds to toluene, xylene, styrene and other organic materials.
The dichromate-type tube picks up some organic compounds not detected
by the benzene tube. It would have also been included in the kit concept
except that large quantities of water vapor were found to produce an
interfering color response.
Studies were conducted which showed that if a scrubber tube for moisture
is placed in front of the dichromate detector tube, tests are sharper,
easier to read and free from the interference caused by water vapor.
Scrubber tubes of the same size as the detector tube were fabricated using
calcium sulfate with indicator as is commonlv used in drying columns and
dessicators.
Since moisture tends to fill the "openings1' of silica gel, and retard
detection responses, the drying tube concept is generally applicable to
all detector tubes. However, since the benzene analyzer tube functions
adequately without it, for simplicity, drying tubes are not included in
the kit.
13
-------
The following Bendix/Gastec detector tubes were tested but rejected
because of lack of response or responded similarly to the iodine pent-
oxide or dichromate tubes: a) acrylonitrile (No. 191), b) vinyl chloride
(No. 131L), c) methyl chloroform (No. 135) and d) styrene (No. 124).
Kitagawa tubes: a) butadiene (No. 168b) , b) ethylene (No. 108b) , c)
isopropyl alcohol (No. 150) and d) methyl alcohol (No. 119) were rejected
for the same reasons.
In conjunction with this study, Army detector tubes for chemical agents
were also tested for response to chemical pollutants. The mustard, lewisite
and hydrogen cyanide tubes each detected high concentrations of phosphorous
pentasulfide. In addition, the hydrogen cyanide tube also detected acetone
cyanohydrin at the 10 mg/1 level. The phosgene tube did not detect any of
the contaminants. The military tubes were rejected because of their limited
application.
m. Enzyme Systems. Detection systems for certain materials have been
designed based on their ability to inhibit the action of an enzyme on a
chemical substrate. The action of the enzyme on the substrate may be
monitored electrometrically or in the case of colored substrates, may be
measured colorimetrically.
Such systems can even be designed into simple "go-no-go" spot tests
which can be assessed visually. The Army uses a detector ticket of this
type with horse serum cholinesterase to detect nerve agents (Appendix B,
p. 10 and 15). This device is also sensitive to certain insecticides
( Table 2 ) .
Studies were conducted using the Army enzyme test ticket in solution
to obtain better color discrimination. This was achieved, but the range
of response was diminished and this approach was abandoned.
The Army enzyme test uses Tris buffer, 0.05M, pH 8.0. The buffer is
also used for detection of heavy metals (see Section q ) and must be
specially prepared. Therefore, for use in the EPA kit Army buffer was
discarded and buffer described here was used:
1. Dissolve 2.43 gm of tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane in 100 ml
distilled water.
2. Using 25 ml of the above solution, add 28.75 ml of 0.1N RC1 to
obtain a pH of 8.0. Dilute to a final volume of 100 ml.
3. Wash the buffer with alliquots of dithizone (diphenylthiocarbazone)
solution (25 mg/1 chloroform) using one part dithizone solution to 25 parts
of buffer. When the dithizone layer remains blue, (about three washings)
the buffer is ready for use.
14
-------
A number of readily available enzyme/substrate kits for clinical
application were obtained and evaluated. They were generally unresponsive
and in addition, because they were intended for clinical use posed certain
stability and operational limitations for field use. Included were an
Ethyl Alcohol Reagent Set (Cat. No. 7919) and Alkaline Phosphatase Reagent
Set (Cat. No. 7040 Code APR) from Worthington Biochemical Corporation and
an Alkaline Phosphatase Reagent Set (Cat. No. 15987) and a Blood Sugar
(Glucose Oxidase) (Cat. No. 15754) from Boehringer Mannheim GMBE, Biochem-
ical Department.
n. Fluorescent Probes. A group of compounds known as fluorescent
probes were investigated as general detectors for high molecular weight
organic compounds-^. Fluorescent probes are compounds which are non-
fluorescent in the presence of water or other polar material, but highly
fluorescent in non-polar media.
To test the probes, columns packed with macroreticular resins (Rohm and
Haas, XAD-2) were used to concentrate contaminants from water. Then a
solution of the fluorescent probe was passed through the column so that the
extracted substances would fluoresce. However, all the probes examined
gave a positive fluorescent test with resin alone (a styrene-divinylbenzene
copolymer) and with no contaminants present.
Contaminants were also extracted by shaking 50 ml of water sample with
one ml of chloroform. The chloroform extracts were then spotted on glass
fiber material, sprayed with benzene solutions of the probes and examined
under longwave ultraviolet light. 7-(p-Methoxybenzylamino)-4-nitrobenz-2-
oxa-l,3-diazole (MBD) at 0.0032 g/1 benzene gave the best results of a
number of probes tested. In many cases, a relatively high fluorescent
background was noted. Further testing showed if the glass fiber was
sprayed with indandione reagent (2-diphenylacetyl-l,3-indandione)-'-^ after
application of the probe, the fluorescent background became very dull and
the green fluorescent spots were more easily read. As a next step, MED
and indandione were combined into a single spray reagent at concentrations
of 0.0032 g and 0.03 g respectively per liter of benzene. When the MBD-
indandione method was tested against contaminants from the model list,
some compounds were seen as bright green spots and others because of their
ability to absorb light were seen as dull "quench" spots, both of which
were considered positive tests. Materials giving either of these
responses are styrene, nonylphenol, nitrophenol, EPN, malathion, parathion,
sevin, fermate, 2,4-D (acid) and 2,4,5-T (acid).
It should be remembered that water prevented fluorsence of the probes.
It was difficult to assure that all the water was removed after extraction
with chloroform. Residual water on the glass fiber media would retard the
reaction or give the effect of a false positive "quench" test. Use of small
electric heaters operating off a DC power supply to remove the water became
too cumbersome.
15
-------
Because of false-positive tests, and need for extraction, need for
a specially formulated spray reagent and an ultraviolet light, the
procedure was abondoned. Elimination of the the fluorescent probe has
no significant effect on detection capability since most of the contami-
nants (model list) are detected by other tests. It is impossible to
determine if there is a serious loss in detection with respect to com-
pounds from the Federal Register since the reaction is unpredictable.
o. Fluoride. Fluoride was determined with both the colorimeter
and spectrophotometer. Detection is based on the decolorization of
sodium 2-(parasulfophenylazo)-l,8-dihydroxy-3,6^naphthalene disulfonate
(SPADNS), a standard test for fluoride in water . A significant number
of contaminants in the Federal Register listing contain fluoride. Also,
the test detects other materials (see Table 2). See Appendix B, p. 22
for procedure.
p. Hardness. The Hach Total Hardness Test Kit, Model HA-71A, was
used to measure hardness. The kit uses a "drop-count" titration method
with ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA). The end point is determined
with Eriochrome Black T. It detected both calcium hypochlorite and
aluminum sulfate at the 10 mg/1 level, but it was not expected to have
a broad detection capability and was dropped.
Test papers for hardness (Micro Essential Laboratory) were too
subjective for quantitative analysis.
q. Heavy Metals. Diphenylthiocarbazone (dithizone) is a general
complexing reagent commonly used for the qualitative and quanititative
analysis of metals . The blue reagent (chloroform solution or a
similar solvent) is shaken with an aqueous solution of the metal ion;
colored metal-dithizone complexes (usually pink but may be other colors)
are extracted, into the lower solvent laver. Adjustment of pH can make
the procedure selective for specific metals. In view of the number of
metals present in the Federal Register listing, a reliable heavy metals
test was considered prerequisite for the kit.
The method was evaluated by shaking one ml of 0.005% dithizone in
chloroform with 25 ml of water sample. Extreme variability was noted in
the responses obtained. The problem was traced to the high sensitivity
of the test; it was uncertain whether the reagent was reacting with
pollutant or with contamination in the eouipment and/or reagents. Use
of individually sealed expendable plastic tubes eliminated contamination
in the system. Inexpensive cellulose acetate tubes (available in bulk),
were used. These soften somewhat in chloroform but not to the point of
leaking. Polystyrene tubes dissolve after standing in chloroform.
TM
Hach MercuVer ' 2, a dry dithizone-type reagent designed for
quantitative measurment of mercury, was evaluated as a general heavy
metals test. The method was simplified to a qualitative spot test. It
was studied in neutral and slightly alkaline solutions. When buffered
16
-------
with Tris buffer, pH 8.0, detection of multiple heavy metals was increased
significantly. See Appendix B, p. 16 for the procedure developed for the
kit. Also, note the section on Enzyme Systems (Section m) for the prepa-
ration and washing of Tris buffer with dithizone for this application.
Response to contaminants from the model list ( Table 2) does not show
the capability of this reagent to heavy metals. Additional solutions of
metal compounds were prepared for further evaluation. Positive tests were
obtained with 100 mg/1 or less of the following heavy metals: cadmium,
cobalt, copper, gold, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc.
A recent report described the preparation of open-cell polyurethane
cubes impregnated with chromogenic organic reagents. It was conceived that
the expendable cellulose acetate tubes could be prepackaged with dithizone
impregnated foam cubes. In use the cube filled tubes would require only
the addition of water, shaking, and observation for a change in the color
of the cube.
Polyurethane was washed and prepared according to the reported procedure.
Cubes about 1 cm on the side were placed in polyethylene bags and kneaded
until uniform in color with solutions of dithizone in various phthalates
(3 ml solutions to 1 gm of cubes was used). The most stable preparation
was found to be 0.025 gm of dithizone in 50 ml of diisobutyl phthalate.
Tests run with dithizone foam cubes showed them to be as sensitive
as MercuVer^2 even without the use of Tris buffer. Unfortunately, most
of the preparations shovred serious signs of deterioration after several
months at room temperature. Although there is some possibility of
stabilizing the reagent cubes with ascorbic acid or other antio^idantff,
time limitations prevented completion of this study.
r . Ion-Selective Electrodes. Several ion-selective electrodes were.
obtained to assess their feasibility for the detector kit. An ammonia
electrode (Chemtrix) was evaluated in conjunction with the Chemtrix Type
40E battery-operated portable pF meter which was then the current choice
of meters. Although supposedly compatible, the ammonia electrode never
functioned satisfactorily, apparently due to limitations of the meter.
A divalent ion-selective electrode (Corning No. 476235) with a laboratory
type meter was tested against the contaminants (model list). The electrode
was prepared as described in the manufacturer's instructions and immersed
in each stirred solution along with a calomel reference electrode. After
equilibration the potentials were read and recorded. The concentrations of
the contaminants was 1000 mg/1 or a saturated solution whichever was less.
The divalent electrode behaved much like a conductivity electrode responsive
to total ionic strength of the solution. Results were found to follow a
definite trend. Distilled water read a potential of -100 mV. The non-
ionic organics all showed a reading of -110 to -129 mV. Sevin at -135 and
17
-------
nitrophenol at -140 mV were the only exceptions. The ionic inorganics
all gave readings of -60 to -90 mV. The only significant departures
were phosphorus pentasulfide and aluminum sulfate at 0 mV and chloro-
sufonic acid at +35 mV.
A redox electrode which was considered was found unsuitable; the
presence of both the oxidized and reduced, form of the substance to be
detected was required to obtain a signal. This necessitates polarizing
the electrode which in turn requires an additional regulated power supply
for use and calibration. Also, the platinum surface is not reproducible
from day-to-day and would need continued standardization.
All-in-all work with electrodes was not promising. They pose a
number of calibration problems and do not appear to be sufficiently
versatile for non-routine situations encountered in the field. In
addition, they show limited capability for organics which is the area
of prime concern. Also, electrodes are expensive and require the use of
a significantly more expensive meter.
s. Methylene Blue Active Substances (I1BAS) . This method is used
to determine alkyl benzene sulfonate (ABS) in water. Under the conditions
specified in the test procedure, substances which react are referred to as
tnethylene blue active substances . It measures surfactants in water. The
procedure is subject to interferences such as organically bound sulfates,
sulfonates, carboxylates, phosphates, phenols, cyanides, thiocyanates and
even some inorganic ions like nitrate and chloride^. It was the long list
of interferences which led to its consideration as a multiple response
detector.
The original method is designed for quantitative measurements using
a colorimeter. For simplicity and to reduce the volume of reagents, the
procedure was evaluated for use in a spot test application. In use, a
buffered aqueous solution of metbylene blue is mixed with the water
sample in a test tube and shaken with 1 ml of chloroform. Materials in
the water phase which are active with methylene blue extract into the
solvent phase as blue colored products.
The procedure did respond to phosphorus pentasulfide, acetone
cyanohydrin, xylenes, nitophenol, ammonium nitrate, malathion, parathion,
fermate, 2,4-D (acid) and 2,4,5-T (acid). However, because response was
obtained only at the highest concentration and the intensity of the color
was not very strong the test was considered too unreliable for the kit.
t. Nitrate Nitrogen. Hach Nitrate Test Kit, Model NI-11 was
evaluated for nitrate in water. The kit which uses prepackaged reagents
and s color comparator was rejected in favor of the method used with the
colorimeter or spectrophotometer. See Table 2 for results with the
contaminants (model list) and Appendix B, p. 19 for the procedure. It
is seen that the method is responsive to materials other than nitrate ion.
1H
-------
u. Odor. Tests were conducted by simply sniffing the mouths of
flasks containing the different dilutions of contaminants in distilled
water. Odor was easily one of the most sensitive detection means with
broadest response capability. The following materials were detectable
at the concentrations noted by two or more investigators:
Detection Sensitivities of Contaminants by Odor, mg/1
Contaminant Detection Limit
Phenol 1000
Benzene 1000
Phosphorus Pentasulfide 1
Styrene 0.7
Acetone Cyanohydrin 100
Isoprene 0.1
Xylenes 1.3
Nitrophenol 100
Aluminum Sulfate 1000
Toxaphene 3
EPN 5
Malathion 1.5
Parathion 0.3
Heptachlor 0.02
Chlordane 0.1
Ferrnate 120
Use of odor as an analytical tool is difficult because it is
extremely subjective and impossible to standardize in a practical man-
ner for use in the field by different operators. Use of odor as a
detector is further complicated by the fact that airborne vapors of
contaminant would make it impossible to pinpoint its location in the
water. Use of odor as a detection method was rejected.
v. pH. It was decided that pF monitoring would be important in
tracing contamination and therefore accuracy and sensitivity were con-
sidered prerequisite. Impregnated papers and chemical indicators with
comparators were too subjective. Several electronic meters were consid-
ered. A compact battery-operated pF meter, Type 40E marketed by Chemtrix,
provided reliable and accurate measurements. A similar meter by Fach,
Model 1Q75 pH meter, appeared to give quicker responses with more
reproducible results. The Hach meter, however, was selected only for
convenience in design (see Section 5).
Combination pK electrodes were studied with both meters and were
satisfactory. A sealed combination pH electrode marketed by Chemtrix
requiring no servicing vas also tested. The unit was convenient in that
it was rugged!zed, expendable and had a life of two years. However,
response with it was sluggish and generally slower than with the con-
ventional combination electrodes.
19
-------
See Table 2 for the pH data; Appendix B, p. 9 and 18 describes
pH measurement in the field.
w. Phenolics. Commercial kits for phenol use the 4-aminoantipyrene
method which involves a lengthy and awkward extraction procedure. An
extreriely sensitive test for phenol based on the Berthelot reaction ' '
was studied for use with the Hach DR Colorimeter or Spectrophotometer. The
reagents required and the procedure developed is described:
1. Reagents: Bleach/Caustic - Dilute 10 ml commercial bleach (5%
NaOCl) + 60 ml 10% aqueous NaOF to 1 liter with distilled water.
Ammonia Reagent - Dilute 10 ml cone, ammonium hydroxide to 100 ml
with distilled1 water.
Sodium Nitroprusside - Dissolve 6.0 g of sodium nitroprusside in
100 ml distilled water. Dilute 12.5 ml of this solution to 500 ml with
distilled water to make a working solution.
2. Procedure: Place 21 ml water sample in a glass-stoppered 25 ml
graduate. Add 2 ml Bleach/Caustic, 1 ml Ammonia Reagent and 1 ml working
solution of Sodium Nitroprusside. Pun a blank in parallel. Incubate the
sample and blank for 5 minutes in a water bath at 56 + 2°C. Cool at room
temperature for 5 minutes. Read in the DR Colorimeter using the 2408 filter
or in the spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 625 nm. Compare with phenol
standards prepared in a similar manner (Heating for field application was
accomplished using a canned dry heat) .
Although extraction procedures are avoided, the method is lengthy and
it introduced a need for heat and a temperature controlled water bath. The
method was found vey useful as a laboratory procedure but unsuitable for
field work.
A phenol spot test was developed by modifying the quantitative Hacb
procedure. The developed method sacrifices quantification for simplicity
and reduction of reagent volume. See Table 2 for the data and Appendix
B, p. 17 for the procedure.
Several experiments were conducted to prepare phenol test devices
similar to the cellulose acetate devices containing dithizone cubes for
heavy metals. A solution was prepared containing 1 g 4-aminoantipyrene
and 1 g tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane in 5 ml dimethylphthalate-
acetone (1:1). This solution was kneaded with 1 g urethane cubes!? in
a plastic bag to obtain a uniform yellow color. The cubes sprinkled
with 5-10 crystals of potassium fe.rricyani.de are ready for use. The
items were found to give quick and easily discernible tests with
solutions containing as little as 0.1 mg/1 phenol. Sufficient time
was not available at the end of the program to determine the stability
of the system.
-------
x. Phosphate. Each Total Phosphate Test Kit, Model PO-24, was
evaluated for detection of phosphate in water. The kit has prepackaged
reagents and a color comparator. Results were more reliable when the
same reagents are used with the Hach DR Colorimeter or Hach Spectrophoto-
meter. See data, Table 2 and procedure, Appendix B, p.20. Additional
experiments in support of the "paper analysis" showed that the procedure
would also detect concentrations of less than 100 mg/1 of arsenates,
arsenites, and bromates.
y. Sulfate. Hach Sulfate Test Kit, Model SF-1, was evaluated for
detection of sulfate. The kit uses prepackaged reagent which causes a
turbidity in the presence of sulfate ion. Concentration is correlated
to the ability to observe a heavy "X" marking at the bottom of a graduate
through different depths of the water sample with the turbidity. The
procedure is extremely insensitive and can only be considered semiquanti-
tative.
The same reagent with either the colorimeter or spectrophotometer
gives a 10-fold increase in sensitivity with greater reliability. The
procedure is highly specific; it was adopted for the kit in spite of this
fact due to the large number of sulfate compounds in the Federal Pegister
listing. See Table II for the data; the procedure is given in Appendix B,
p. 20.
z. Turbidity. Turbidity was measured using both the colorimeter and
spectrophotometer. Tests were conducted only to show that turbidity can
be measured and could be indicative of insoluble contamination. Because
the physical form of contaminants ''e.g. fine powders, flakes, granules,
emulsions, etc.) cannot be anticipated, nor can the conditions of water
environment (e.g. turbulent creek, quiet pond, etc.) no attempt was made
to correlate turbidity caused by the contaminants (model list) to
contamination.
See Appendix B, p. 18 for the procedure adopted for the kit.
TESTING WITH NATURAL WATERS
The efficacy of the selected procedures was determined with water
samples taken from Winter's Run, Big Gunpowder Falls and the Susquehanna
River in Parford County, MD. The waters were analyzed as received using
the candidate methods. Afterwards the samples were polluted in the
laboratory with contaminants from the model list in the manner described
previously. The detection limit was determined for the qualitative spot
tests; the lowest quantity of contaminant required to produce a signifi-
cant change over that of the original water was determined for the quan-
titative tests. Usually, there was some loss in sensitivity when compared
to distilled water; however, nothing significant was found to preclude
use of these methods in a detector kit.
The data is summarized in Tables 3, 4 and 5.
-------
Table 2
Detection Systems for Hazardous Materials
(Concentrations of Hazardous Materials in mg/1 showing a measureable response)
Hazardous Materials
sa
0)
4-I
1000
100
100
10
120
1
1
1
17
100
1000
10
3
50
145
12
0.3
10
90
28
10
10
100
100
100
100
1000
1000
280
100
10
660
100
10
10
0.4
121
1
0.5
120
10
10
1
2.5
1
1
1
1000
1
1
50
145
2.5
0.03
0.02
0.4
12
2.5
0.7
1
10
10
10
660
1
10
100 ,
1000
500
14.5
25
0.2
4
12
1000
10
1000
120
1000
100
tc
NOTE:
Instrumental measureable responses are indicated
or change of transraittance of 5%.
by a change of 0.5 pH unit, gain in conductivity of 50 ^imhos/cm
-------
Table 3
Detection of Contaminants in Water from Winter's Run
(Concentrations of Hazardous Materials in mg/1 showing a measureable response)
Hazardous Materials
1. Phenol
2. Methyl Alcohol
3. Acrylonitrile_
5 . Benzene
7. Phosphorus Pentasulfide
8. Styrene
10. Calcium Hypochlorite
11. Nonylphenol ,
12. Isoprene
14. Nitrophenol
15. Ammonium Nitrate
16. Aluminum Sulfate
17. Aldrin_
18 . Toxaphene
19 . DDT
20. EPN
21. Malathion
22. Parathion
23. Oieldrin
24. Heptachlor
25. Sevin
26 . Chlordane
27 . Fermate__
28. Lead Arsenate
29. Disodium Methylarsenate
30. Phenylmercuric Chloride
31. 2,4-D (Acid)
32. 2,4,5-T (Acid)
33. Ammonium Phosphate, Dibasi
NOTE: Instrumental measureable
or change of transwittan
r-t -H
.§•§
1000
500
14.5
2. 5
respo
ce of
Benzene
— L_
100
6.6
10
1.3
145
12
280
nses a
5%.
en
CC 4-*
01 01
1000
6.9
1000
re ind
o
e
V
1 I
1.7]
0.4
Seated
a)
1-1
c
cd
1QOO
100 j
120
hy a c
p.
— 15"
10
1
uT
f 900
hange
Conduct.
— 10"
100
100
100
100
1000
TOW
100
of 0.5
Nitrate
-U ^
10
^TcT
120
pH u
1-1
o
o
5
2. 5
nit, g
Sulfate
10
10"
ain in
Phosphatf
1
T
cond
lAinmonia
I N2
1
1
1000
1
1
500
145
2 .5
0 03
0 .02
4
120
2.5
6.9
T~
uctivit
Chloride
10
10
IcT
100
1000
145
40~
120
y °* -*^
Fluoride
1000
100
1000
1000
w
CO
-------
Table 4
Detection of Contaminants in Water from Big Gunpowder Falls
(Concentrations of Hazardous Materials in mg/1 showing a measureable response)
MH O -H 3 CO >-i 0! (X C t-i Id
i-H -H N > W C C T3 tJCNO
-------
Table 5
Detection of Contaminants in Water from Susquehanna River
(Concentrations of Hazardous Materials in mg/1 showing a measureable response)
QJ Oi 4-1 OJ
c
-------
SURVEY OF MARYLAND WATERS
Natural waters from north central Maryland were sampled to determine
range of properties and concentrations of natural constituents.
Twenty-two water sarr.pes were taken from a loop which reached from
approximately 10 miles north of Baltimore, northwest to Emmitsburg, south
toward Frederick, south-easterly towards Laurel, around Baltimore and back
to five miles south of the starting point. The names of the waters where
known were noted; others were identified by their location. The selected
detection methods were used to characterize, the waters and to anticipate
any problems which might arise in use of the kit. ^o difficulties were
experienced in analysis. Generally speaking the waters were of high quality
and changes in them due to contamination should be easy to detect. Only
when samples were taken near the city of Baltimore, in the harbor area, did
some of the background readings (e.g. conductivity, sulfate and chloride)
get so high as to present a significant background.
Data are summarized in Table 6.
-------
-"able 6
Background of Natural Waters of North Central Maryland
Water Source
u
•H
•a
•H p
.c H
1- IX,
3
.
rH -H
0 .C
f • 1_J
-. r-l
> K
tt ^
4) _0)
i — |
O
U
U — .
P W
T3 O
c: ^
0 E
EJ 3
irate
«-j
1-1
Z.
t-H
6C
E
_c
0 <
l — 1 PZ
° S1
0)
4-1
re
c/:
i— i
ot
E
td
.c
a
IK
O
.c
rt
oc
e
rt
•H
c
O i — i
< E"
"C
•H
c
X
O
?— (
Ot
E
•c
O iH
iH OC
P^ E
1. Loch Raven Reservoir
2. Liberty Reservoir
3. Stream West of Taneytown
4. Stream West of Taneytown
5. Stream West of Taneytown
6. Monacacy River, Rt 97
7. Stream East of Enmitsburg
8. Stream South of £minitsburg
9. Stream North of Frederick
10. Stream North of Frederick
11. Monacacy River, Rt 80
12. Hawlings Run
13. Pautuxent River, Rt 97
14. Cattail Creek
15. Pautuxent River, Rt 108
16. Stream Near Brinklow
17. Middle Pautuxent River
18. Little Pautuxent River
19. Patapsco River, Rt 144
20. Patapsco River, Baltimore
21. Patapsco River, Baltimore
22. Falls Run
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
26
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
*
-
*
A
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.9
6.9
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.1
6.8
7.1
7.0
6.8
6.9
6.8
6.9
6.8
7.3
7.2
7.3
6.6
7.3
7.5
139
136
165
135
249
185
165
104
60
160
200
78
106
110
95
84
130
142
113
162
600
165
4.8
6.2
7.5
5.7
4.8
3.8
2.2
1.8
0.0
7.0
7.5
5.3
4.8
6.2
4.0
3.7
4.8
4.0
4.8
3.8
3.7
4.0
20
40
30
30
40
50
40
10
10
10
30
20
20
10
0
10
0
0
0
0
30
0
3
4
7
8
18
16
12
4
1
11
15
1
1
1
3
3
6
8
7
12
35
5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
0.2
<0.1
< 0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
< 0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
< 0.1
0.4
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
<0.1
0.4
0.8
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
1.6
0.5
<0.1
10.4
15.9
9.1
8.2
25.4
10.4
5.0
4.0
1.3
5.5
8.8
6.0
6.4
9.1
7.8
7.8
13.4
17.7
12.5
16.5
110.0
15.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
*Stains were less than l-2mm, tests considered negative.
NOTE: All samples represent different sources of water, or significantly different points of the same body of
water.
-------
SECTION 5
FORMULATION OF DETECTION CONCEPT
SELECTED TESTS
Many of the reasons for selection or rejection of individual tests have
been discussed (Experimental Studies) . Unfortunately, selection is often
based not necessarily on capability required, but on what is available.
All-in-all every effort was made to assemble the best combination of tests
from what is available, with emphasis placed on reaching previously set
goals of the detector kit. Generally, procedures which are simple, reliable,
stable and commercially available (when possible) and lend themselves to the
detection concept were selected. To maintain compactness, duplication of
detection capability was avoided. For example, numerous metal tests were
eliminated by adopting dithizone as a general heavy metals test.
A summary of characteristics of the 15 procedures selected for the kit
are given in Table 7 .
PROJECTED DETECTION CAPABILITY
A "paper analysis" was made to project the probability of detection of
the 370 compounds listed in the Federal register. Each compound was screened
by comparison with the detection tests (except turbidity) listed in Table 7 ;
that is, each compound was compared with a) data derived from laboratory test-
ing with contaminants from the model list, and b) data derived from handbooks.
A compound was considered detectable by a particular test if it was judged that
a saturated solution or 1000 mg/1 of the compound (whichever was less) has a
significantly greater than 5<"7 chance of responding. Where information was
considered inadequate to make a satisfactory judgment, individual additional
testing was considered. (For example, in this manner it was determined that
28
-------
to
CD
TABLE 7
Summary of Methods Selected for Detector Kit
Detection
Parameter
Cholinesterase
Inhibitors
Benzene
Heavy Metals
Phenol
Cyanide
pH
Conductivity
Nitrate
Nitrogen
Color
Sulfate
Phosphate
Ammonia
Chloride
Fluoride
Turbidity
Type*
Qualitative
Qualitative
Qualitative
Qualitative
Qualitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Quantitative
Process
Enzyme
Ticket
Detector
Tube
Extraction/
Test Tube
Extraction/
Cent. Tube
Detector
Tube
Meter
Meter
Spectro-
photometer
Spectro-
photometer
Spectro-
photometer
Spectro-
photometer
Spectro-
photometer
Spectre-
photometer
Spectro-
photometer
Spectro-
photometer
Reagents**
M30A1, Chemical
Agent Detector
Kit
Bendix/Gastec
Hach/Laboratory
Hach
Kitagawa
—
—
Hach
—
Hach
Hach
Hach
Laboratory
Hach
—
Tine,
Min.
^- o
<2
< 1
< 1
<1
<1
<1
<6
< 1
-------
nitrites would respond to the nitrate test and sulfites were detected by
the sulfate test, whereas, thiosulfates were not. Also, certain arsenates,
arsenites and bromates respond to the phosphate test, but chromate does
not). Extensive testing was conducted with heavy metals and ammonia con-
taining compounds. These data have already been reported under appropriate
sections in Experimental Studies.
Highlights of the "paper analysis" are given in Table 8 Data from
this study indicate that 857, of the contaminants would respond to at least
one parameter; 587, 30% and 10% would respond to two, three, and four or
more parameters respectively. (See complete data in Appendix A.)
Because certain compounds don't show responses for the detection
parameters doesn't necessarily mean non-detection. Rather, many of these
structures are very complex and their reactivity cannot be predicted.
Judging by some of the unexpected responses obtained with many of the
detection methods it is to be expected that some of these materials are
detectable by present methods.
Table 8
Probability of Detection of Water Contaminants
(Based on nominally 370 compounds)
Detection Parameter Probable Responses
Cholinesterase Inhibitors 16
Benzene 20
Heavy Metals 102
Phenol 12
Cyanide 11
pH 66
Conductivity 2C1
Nitrate Nitrogen 18
Color 50
Sulfate 23
Phosphate 18
Ammonia Nitrogen 58
Chloride 72
Fluoride 24
USE CONCEPT
Our goal was to develop a field kit using a standardized, system so that
results are easily obtained and interpreted by a senior technician. This
goal, generally, has been met; tests are easy to perform, short and designed
for ease of operation in the field. However, detecting almost any contami-
nant in any water background is a formidable task which requires ingenuity
and the interpretive skills of a dedicated investigator.
30
-------
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
PH
Conductivity
Turbidity
Nitrate Nitrogen
Color
Sulfate
Phosphate
Ammonia Nitrogen
Chloride
Fluoride
The detection concept relies basically on three evaluations as shown:
DETECTION CONCEPT
General Assessment Relative Measurements
1. Appearance
2. Color of Filtered Water
3. Color of Suspended Matter
Spot Tests
4. Cholinesterase Inhibitors
5. Benzene
6. Heavy Metals
7. Phenol
8. Cyanide
General Assessment procedures allow the operator to make a general
evaluation of the water to be tested. That is, are there slicks present? —
is the water colored? — is there a lot of suspended material?— is the
suspended material colored? Spot Tests are used to indicate if a parti-
cular type of contaminant is present. A positive response to any of these
tests should be considered contamination since it would indicate compounds
not normally found or desired in water. The final group of tests,
Relative Measurements, is based on constituents of natural water. Contami-
nation is indicated by a significant increase in one of these parameters
compared to uncontaminated water.
To use the detection concept the investigator must assess two major
factors: a) The nature of the water source — is it stationary, like a
lake or pond, or is it moving like a stream or river? b) The nature of the
contaminant — is it specifically known or partially known, such that it
may be acid or base, organic or inorganic, phosphate containing, colored,
etc?
In situations where the contaminant is unknown, the investigator
confronts the situation in an orderly fashion: (1) He immediately conducts
the General Assessment evaluations. (2) He considers using the Spot Tests
since these are simple to use and easy to evaluate. (3) He proceeds to the
Relative Measurements. If the location of the contaminant is based on a
relative measurement then he must make a comparison between the area of
31
-------
suspected contamination and a clean source of water (reference sample).
Tn the case of a stream, the reference sample may be taken at a location
upstrean from the contamination. If the body of water is a lake, he must
use his best judgment and select an area believed to he clean. Once the
reference sample is established, it is a matter of deciding which relative
tests can be used in detecting significant changes.
In cases where the specific contamination is known, the investigator
proceeds directly to the applicable tests. For example, an investigator
confronted with a spill of phosphoric acid would immediately perform pH,
conductivity and phosphate tests and determine which is most suitable
for this situation.
A special data sheet for recording and reporting of contamination has
been designed to correspond with the detection concept (see Appendix B,
p. 10).
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF PROTOTYPE KITS
A significant part of design was concerned with human factors
considerations, i.e. man/machine interfaces. The. purpose is to select
procedures and instrumentation which, make tests easy to perform and
evaluate and which provide reliable information. Some of these factors
have already been considered when procedures were selected. For example,
use of test papers, color comparators and pK indicators are considered too
subjective, particularly when measurements must be made relative to a
reference sample. Use of a quality pH meter, conductivity meter and
colorimeter is a prerqulsite. Spot tests, which are also subjective, are
adopted for use in the detection concept as gross tests to be used only
on a "go no-go" basis.
Some of the instruments considered for this program (e.g. the
Chemtrix Type 40E pH meter and Chemtrix Type 70 conductivity meter) have
already been discussed. Much of the development data was obtained with
the instruments; both meet the level of quality and performance required
for the kit. Also, the Hach PR Colorimeter was used extensively and was
found to be a highly satisfactory portable colorimeter.
The Mini-Spec 20 Spectrophotometer (marketed by Bausch and Lomb,
Analytical Systems Division) was also considered briefly for the kit. A
demonstration of the Mini-Spec 20, which is a full grating spectrophotometer
about the size of a pocket calculator, showed it to be a sensitive, accurate
and versatile instrument. The feeling, however, is that it may be too delicate
and sophisticated for field use; many of the pieces used are small and do not
appear to easily lend themselves to operation under rugged conditions.
Originally it was planned to integrate the best available instrumentation
into a suitable carrying case. A prime concern ail-along was to restrict
kit size and x^eight to maintain the man-portable concept. When it appeared
the final package might become too large ar.d unwieldy, instruments combining
-------
several functions were sought. In fact, at that tine, a 4 Function
Water Analyzer (International Ecological Systems) was on the market. The
instrument, which measured about 5x10x11 inches provided pH, conductivity,
colorimeteric and thermal measurements. This item was considered until
its continued availability, service and replacement parts became uncertain.
Finally, a decision was made to adapt the DR-EL/2 portable test kit
marketed by Hach which incorporates a spectrophotometer and a conductivity
meter. Hach agreed to provide this item without the standard equipment or
reagents. In addition, a Hach Model 1975 battery-operated pH meter was
dismantled and reassembled into a special compartment fabricated into the
lid of the case; when the case is open the pH meter faces the operator. The
battery for the pH meter is next to the power supply for the spectrophoto-
meter and conductivity meter.
A significant human factors advantage is gained by use of the
spectrophotometer instead of a filter colorimeter since color filter
changes are not required for the different colorimetric analyses.
It was originally planned to use a case meeting military specifications
for the detector kit. However, the Fach case by comparison, while not as
rugged, is considerably lighter and less expensive. Also use of the Hach
case significantly reduces special design and fabrication costs for the kit.
A particularly important piece of equipment included in the kit is a
plastic syringe with stainless steel head fitted with a glass fiber disc
to filter the water sample. It is used for general assessment of the water
sample and to process it for colorimetric analysis.
Other necessary ancillary equipment or reagents were purchased from
available sources or prepared in the laboratory. Many of the purchased
reagents and equipment were repackaged in the kit in the interest of
economy of space. It must be remembered that only the detector tickets
and substrate are used from the M30A1 Chemical Agent Detector Kit. The
Tris buffer is prepared in the laboratory (Experimental Studies, m.
Enzyme Systems) since it must be washed with dithizone for use in the
heavy metals test.
An Operator's Manual (Appendix B) was prepared for use with the
kit. It describes in detail the use concept, equipment and procedures
used. A source listing for consumable parts is given. Pach manuals for
the DR-EL/2 portable test kit and Yodel 1975 pH meter are also provided.
In addition, laminated outlines of procedures are included for use in the
field.
Tests were conducted with the kits to demonstrate their fieldability.
Modifications were made to the Operator's Manual as a result of these
exercises. The detector kits resulting from this program are shown in
Figures 1 and 2.
-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DETECTOR KIT
co
Figure 1 Hazardous Materials Detector Kit
-------
co
01
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DETECTOR KIT
Figure 2 Hazardous Materials Detector Kit, In Use
-------
REFERENCES
1. Prober, R., "CRC Handbook of Environmental Control", Vol. Ill, Water
Supply and Treatment. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH (1973).
2. Annual Book of ASTM Standards", Part 23, Water; Atmospheric Analysis,
Philadelphia, PA (1973).
3. "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 13th
ed., American Public Health Association, Washington DC (1971).
4. "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", US Environmental
Protection Agency, Analytical Quality Control Laboratory, National
Environmental Research Center, OH (1971).
5. Wilder, I., Lafornara, J.P., Water and Sewage Works, 119, 82 (1972).
6. Duke, F.R. and Smith, G.F., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 12,
201 (1940).
7. Feigl, F., "Spot Tests in Organic Analysis", 7th ed., Elsevier
Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Netherlands (1966).
8. Elsheimer, H.N., Kocken, R.L., Anal. Chem. 3£, 145 (1966).
9. Utsumi, S., J. Chem. Soc. Japan ^3_, 835 (1952).
10. Fehringer, N.V., Ogger, J.D., J. Chromatog. 23_, 95 (1966).
11. Kovacs, M.F., J. of the AOAC, 47_, 1097 (1964).
12. Abbott, D.C., Egan, H., Thomson, J., J. Chromatog. 16, 481 (1964).
13. Kenner, R.A., Aboderin, A.A., Biochemistry, 1£, 4433 (1971).
14. Burnhan, K., Calder, G.V., Fritz, J.S., Junk, G.A., Svel, H.J.,
Willis, W., Anal. Chem., 44, 139 (1972).
15. Braun, R.A., Mosher, W.A., J. of the American Chemical Society,
80, 2749 (1958).
16. Mellan, I., "Organic Reagents in Inorganic Analysis", The Blakiston
Co., Philadelphia, PA (1941).
17. Braun, T., Farag, A.B., Analytica Chimica Acta, 73_. 301 (1974).
18. Berthelot, M.t Repertaire de Chemil Applique, 1^, 284 (1859).
19. Searcy, R.L., Gaugh, G.S., Karotger, J.J., Berquist, L.M., Am. J.
Med. Tech., 27_, 255 (1962).
20. Chancy, A.L., Marbach, C.P., Clin. Chem., £, 130 (1962).
36
-------
LIST OF MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS
1. Anderson Laboratories Corporation, Fort Worth, TX
2. Bausch and Lomb, Analytical Systems Division, Rochester, NY
3. Bendix/Gastec (Products available from National Environmental
Instruments, Inc., Warwick, RI)
4. Boehringer Mannheim GMBH, Biochemcial Department (Products available
from Fisher Scientific Co.)
5. Chemtrix, Inc., Hlllsboro, OR
6. Corning Class Co. (Electrodes are available from VWR Scientific
Division of Univar)
7. Hach Chemical Co., Ames IA
8. International Ecological Svstems Corporation, Mt. Laurel, NJ
9. Kitagava (Products are available from Matheson Gas Products,
East Rutherford, NJ)
10. Micro-Essential Laboratory, Brooklyn, *TY
11. Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA
12. Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Freehold, NJ
37
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75
' C
• ,0 a)
•H -H N
O .C C
CO
>, I-H
> CO
tO 4->
o
C
34-1
0)
-H^i
> 4-i
iJ
nj
>*-l
55
«
03
o
0
3
Acetaldehyde
Acetic acid
Acetic anhydride
Acetone cyanohydrin
Acetyl bromide
Acetyl chloride
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Adiponitrile
Aldrin
Allyl alcohol
Allyl chloride
Aluminum sulfate
Ammonia
Ammonium Compounds :
Ammonium acetate
Ammonium benzoate
Ammonium bicarbonate
Ammonium bisulfite
Ammonium bromide
Ammonium carbamate
Ammonium carbonate
Ammonium chloride
Ammonium citrate, dibasic
Ammonium ferrocyanide
Ammonium fluoborate
Ammonium formate
Ammonium gluconate
Ammonium hydroxide
Ammonium hypophosphite
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
•f
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
4-
+
CO
oc
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
X
o
u
C
4-1
•H
>
C
2
Hi
4-)
td
4-1
o
.4-1
CB
3
t/i
-
cr
c
o
6
c
T3
Ammonium iodide
Ammonium molybdate
Ammonium nitrate
Ammonium oxalate
Ammonium pentaborate
Ammonium silicofluoride
Ammonium sulfamate
Ammonium sulfate
Ammonium sulfide
Ammonium sulfite
Ammonium tartrate
Ammonium thiocyanate
Ammonium thisulfate
Amyl acetate
Aniline
Antimony Compounds :
Antimony pentachloride
Antimony pentafluoride
Antimony potassium tartrate
Antimony tribromide
Antimony trichloride
Antimony trifluoride
Antimony triiodide
Antimony trioxide
Arsenic Compounds :
Arsenic acid
Arsenic disulfide
Arsenic pentaoxide
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
4-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
4-
-t-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
J=
o
.e
01
c
01
N
(U
M
tn
.H
03
4-1
111
n)
0)
o
C
P-i
(U
•o
re
O-
O
T3
O
U
0)
(-1
O
o
cd
a
CO
o
P-.
a)
•a
Arsenic tribromide
Arsenic trichloride
Arsenic trifluoride
Arsenic triiodide
Arsenic trioxide
Arsenic trisulfide
Cacodylic acid
Calcium arsenate
Calcium arsenite
Potassium arsenate
Potassium arsenite
Sodium arsenate
Sodium arsenite
Sodium cacodylate
Benzene
Benzole acid
Benzonitrile
Benzoyl chloride
Benzyl chloride
Beryllium Compound a :
Beryllium chloride
Beryllium fluoride
Beryllium hydroxide
Beryllium nitrate
Beryllium phosphate
Beryllium sulfate
Boric acid
Brucine
Butyl acetate
+
+
+
+
+
+ i
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-t-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER. VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
03
t—I
TO
>
4-t
TH
>
Butylamine
Butyric acid
Cadmium Compounds :
Cadmium acetate
Cadmium bromide
Cadmium chloride
Cadmium fluoborate
Cadmium nitrate
Cadmium sulfate
Calcium carbide
Calcium hydroxide
Calcium hypochlorite
Calcium oxide
Captan
Carbaryl
Carbon disulflde
Catechol
Chlordane
Chlorine
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chlorosulfonic acid
Chromium Compounds :
Ammonium bichromate
Ammonium chromate
Calcium chromate
Chromic acid
Chromic sulfate
i— i
rH
O
f.
U
+
Benzene
+
+~~
^ , v u
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER. VOL. 40. NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
t-t
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
&
•H
c
o
CJ
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
.1
g
£
4!
CN|
0)
U
tJ
£
DDT
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dichlobenil
Dichlone
Dichlorvos
Dieldrin
Diethy lamine
D ime thy lamine
Dinitrobenzene
Dinitrophenol
Diquat
Disulfoton
Diuron
Dodecyl benzenesulfonic acid
Dodecyl benzenesulfonic acid, calcium
salt
Dodecyl benzenesulfonic acid
isopropanol amine salt
Dodecyl benzenesulfonic acid, sodium
salt
Dodecyl benzenesulfonic acid,
triethanolamine salt
Dursban
Endosulfan
Endrin
Ethion
Ethylbenzene
Ethy lened lamine
Ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
.0
•H
d
^-4
•
f—J
O
n
CJ
0)
c
QJ
N
C
0)
PQ
•— I
CO
4-1
0)
y
t»-l
J>
cd
Hi
X
<-<
0
c
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250. DEC. 75 (continued)
,0
•H
C
N
C
(0
4J
o
41
»-l "O
2 •"
C C
dJcO
^,
4-1
TH
>
*O
C
O;
VJ
nJ
t-i
nJ
.C
O)
O
Z
«
HI
13
D
T3
O
D
terroue ammonium sulfate
Ferrous chloride
Ferrous oxalate
Ferrous sulfate
Isoprene
Kelthane
Lead Compel ^i,, •
Lead acetate
Lead arsenate
Lead bromide
Lead chloride
Lead tluoborate
Lead t!Uoride
Lead iodide
Lead nitrate
Lead 8tearate
Lead SUlfate
Lead SUlfide
Lead tetraacetate
Lead thiocyanate
Lead Chiosulfate
Lead tungstate
Lindane
MalaLhion ~
Maleic ac^d
Malelc anhydride
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
» s
i-H N
O C
f 01
U «
£
o
c
01
cd
0) _
K PL4
0)
•o
C
cd
O
o
1
o
0)
4J
cd
H
o
o
cd
>4H
i-H
CD
a)
4J
cd
ex
CO
o
(X,
O)
•a
1-1
o
a>
•a
.M I
Mercury Compounds:
Mercuric acetate
Mercuric ammonium chloride
Mercuric bromide
Mercuric chloride
Mercuric cyanide
Mercuric Iodide
Mercuric nitrate
Mercuric oxide
Mercuric sulfate
Mercuric thlocyanate
Mercurous chloride
Mercurous Iodide
Mercurous nitrate
Methoxychlor
Methyl mercaptan
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl parathlon
Mevlnphos
Molybdlc trloxlde
Monoethylamlne
Naled
Naphthalene
Naphthalenic acid
Nickel Compounds :
Nickel acetate
Nickel ammonium sultate
Nickel bromide
-f
+ .
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
'+
+
+
+
+
. +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-1- •
+
+
+
+
+
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
CO
l-l
.0)
CO) i-l *J Q) 0)
C «H *O O4J 4J .C i-l i-l i-l
i-HN £* C d -O IJ O M-l CO OO-O
OC BJ Olid BtJt-liHO i "-1 3
.C 0) 01 .C >, SE O i-l O 3 J2 Jj .C iH
Nickel chloride
Nickel fluoride
Nickel formate
Nickel hydroxide
Nickel iodide
Nickel nitrate
Nickel perchlorate
Nickel aulfate
Nitric acid
Nitrobenzene
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitrophenol
Paraformaldehyde
Parathion
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Phosgene
Phosphoric acid
Phosphorus
Phosphorus oxychloride
Phosphorus pentasulflde
Phosphorus trichloride
Polychlorinated blphenyls
Potassium hydroxide
Potassium permanganate
Proplonlc acid
Propionlc anhydride
Propyl alcohol
Pyrethrins
Pyrogallic acid
Quinoline
Resorcinol
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ .
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ •
+
+ '
+
+ .
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
4-
j.
+
+
+
+
+
*
+
+
1 +
+
+
+
+
+
+
00
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
•
•H
f.
C
M
iH
0
f,
0
ID
C
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
f
a)
C
4)
N
e
4)
ffl
4-1
0!
a
0)
O
C
oi
.C
C
ta
>,
>,
4-1
1-1
>
CJ
3
Vc
o
Sulfate
Phosphati
Ammonia 1
Chloride
Fluoride
Toxaphene
Trichlorfon
Trichlorophenol
Trlethvlamine
Tr ime thy lamine
Uranium Compounds:
Uranium peroxide
Uranvl acetate
Uranyl nitrate
Uranyl sulfate
Vanadium Compounds:
Vanadium oxytrichloride
Vanadium pentoxide
Vanadvl sulfate
Vinyl acetate
Xvlenol
Xylene
Zectran
Zinc Compounds:
Zinc acetate
Zinc ammonium chloride
Zinc ammonium sulfate
Zinc borate
Zinc carbonate
Zinc chloride
Zinc fluoride _^___
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-------
APPENDIX A
PROBABLE RESPONSES OF DETECTOR KIT TO MATERIALS LISTED IN FEDERAL
REGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 250, DEC. 75 (continued)
f.
TO
r-l
Cfl
4-1
0)
>.
4J
•H
>
c
«
0)
-a
S3
0)
•HN^CC -OI'OIHOIOOO
O C CO 4) »— t i-H C E iH 3
.CD Q)X>. KO-HO3X eXiH
OPQ X PnCJ CXU^OWPn
-------
APPENDIX B
OPERATOR'S MANL'AL FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DETECTOR KIT
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
The Hazardous Materials Detector Kit is a portable self-sufficient
laboratory capable of providing the investigator in the field with a
variety of valuable information to assist him in detecting (not neces-
sarily identifying) and tracing contamination in inland waters. While
similar to other water test kits, the eouioment and orocedures contained
are designed to be used as a part of a total concept. Before attempting
to use the kit in an investigation, the operator should thoroughly famil-
arize himself with the concept of use and obtain an understanding of the
significant data that can be derived. Snecial apparatus, tests taken
from commercial and military kits, and procedures designed specifically
for this item form the makeup of the kit.
The kit contains delicate instrumentation and should be treated
accordingly. Care and maintenance suggested in the manuals should serve
to prolong its usefulness. Instrumentation consists of a battery or
line-operated spectrophotometer and a conductivity meter contained in a
Hach Chemical Co. DR-EL/2 Laboratory enclosure. In addition, the Hach
Model 1975 battery-operated pH meter has been modified and incorporated
in the enclosure. Hach manuals for the nR-EL/2 Laboratory and Model
1975 pH Meter are provided with the kit and should be referred to
frequently for operation, service and maintenance, in addition to this
manual and the Hach manuals, abbreviated, laminated instruction cards
(sufficient to provide the operator in the field with auidance) are
included. Data sheets are provided for reporting and recording data.
To assist the operator in quickly gaining familiarity with use of
the kit, this manual is divided into sections: (a) Concept of Use, (b)
Equipment and Methodology, (c) Analytical Procedures and (d) Consumable
Materials.
-------
SECTION II
CONCEPT
USE
Orininally, it was intended to develop a field kit usinq a
standardized system, in which results are easily obtained and inter-
preted by a senior technician. These cioals, in part, have been net;
the tests are easy to perform, short, and desioned for the nreatest
ease of operation in the field. However, the task of detecting almost
any contaminant in any water backaround is
the ingenuity and interpretive skills of a
kit combines instrumental and wet chemical
chemist with experience in water chenisty,
sary to detect and follow contamination in
kit relies basically on three types of evaluations as shown in the table
below. Details of these procedures are m'ven in the section on Analytical
Procedures.
a formidable one and reauires
dedicated investiqater. The
methods; in the hands of a
it can provide the data neces-
inland waterways. Use of the
Detection Procedures of the Hazardous "aterials Vtector Kit
General Assessment
a. Appearance
b. Color of Filtered Hater
c. Color of Suspended Matter
Spot Tests
d. Cholinesterase Inhibitors
e. Benzene
f. Heavy Metals
q. Phenol
h. Cyanide
Relative Mpasurements
k. Turbidity
1 . Nitrate "Mtroqen
n. rrlor
n. Sijlfate
o. p^osohate
D. A^r>onia Nitroqen
q. Chloride
r. Fluoride
The tests as a whole are larnelv nonsoecific and are capable of
detectinn a much wider range of contaminants than is indicated. General
-------
Assessment procedures (a to c) allow the ooerator to nake a general
evaluation of the water to he tested. Snot Tests orocedures (r1 to h)
indicate that a particular type of contaminant is or is not present.
However, any positive resoonse by the Soot T«sts should he considered
as contamination since this indicates a oronerty not normally found or
desired in water. The final nroup of tests (i to r), ^lative M»asure-
nents, is based on a natural oronerty of water. rontamination is indi-
cated when a significant increase in one of these parameters is observed
over uncontaminated water.
Hhile use of the kit cannot be standardized for all situations, a
systematic approach can make qatherinq of data more direct and meaning-
ful. First the investigator assesses the oresence of contamination by
evaluating two major factors: (a) The nature of the water source -- is
it stationary, like a lake or a oond, or is it movinq like a stream or
river; and (b) The nature of the contaminant -- is it specifically known,
totally unknown or partially known, such that it may be acid or base,
orqanic or inorganic, phosphate containing, colored, etc.
Second the investigator confronts the situation in an orderly
fashion: (a) He immediatly conducts a "Gpneral Assessment" (tests a to
c); (b) He considers using Soot Tests (•"- to 8) since these are simple and
easy to evaluate. If he knows, or suspects strongly, that the contami-
nant will resoond to one of these tests, this may he the only tool he
needs to conduct his investigation; and (c) M° noes to Relative Measure-
ments (tests 9 to 18). If location of the contaminant is based on a
relative measurement then he must nake a comparison between the area of
suspected contamination and a clean source of water (reference sample).
In the case of a stream, the reference sample may be taken at a location
upstream from the contamination. If the bodv of water is a lake, he must
use his best iudament and select an area believed to be clean. Once the
reference water is established, it is a matter of determining which rela-
tive tests will be most useful in detecting significant differences.
Hhen the pollutant is totally unknown, the investiaator may have to
run the entire series of tests, looking for those revealing the most
significant differences. T^ese differences nay then he taken as indicators
of suspected contamination. THereafter, only tests showing the significant
differences need he run on suspect samples.
In those cases where some information is L'.nown about the contaminant,
it may be sufficient to run only tests which are relevant. For example,
if the investigator knows the contaminant to he an inorganic acid, he may
proceed immediately to DM and conductivity measurements and run tests for
inornanic ions. For example, the investiaator knows that the contaminant
is chlorosulfonic acid. H° has ootions to make nu, conductivity, chloride
and/or sulfate determinations. H^ would probably select several parameters
which have the lowest background readinq with resoect to the reference
water.
.54
-------
If the investigator knows the contaminant to be detected but not if it
responds to any of the tests, he may wish to nake some quick soot tests in
the laboratory before taking the kit into the field.
After the investigator has selected indicators for contamination he
will want to record his data carefully and systematically. T^e gradual
change in the data will eventually orovide clues to the location and level
of contamination. Data sheets designed soecifically for this purpose are
included in the kit.
As indicated earlier, use of the kit cannot ^e fully standardized;
the investigator must be ready at each occasion to nake judgments relative
to the surroundings and the circumstances of the contamination. In the
procedures section all possible anticipated reactions to the tests have been
noted. If, however, in the performance of a test, a precipitate or unusual
color not indicated occurs in the test sanole but not the reference sample,
then it is very possible that contamination of some sort is present.
In making determinations with the soectroohotometer, it may often
suffice simply to mark the test positive when a sinnificant color indicative
of contamination starts to develoo. It may be adeouate for the investinator
to know the sample is still heavilv contaminated without actually determining
a specific value.
Perhaps the most difficult judgment to make is to determine how qreat a
difference between the test sample and reference water samnle is significant
in the Relative Measurements tests. It will take familiarization with the
kit and experience in its application to make reliable assessments in a given
situation. As a "rule-of-thumb", based on the studies conducted to date, the
following are considered significant instrumental chanaes:
(a) Change in pH of 0.5 units.
(b) 20 percent gain in conductivity.
(c) 10 percent nain in the full scale deflection (not concentration) in
spectrophotometric procedures.
Experience may show that these values are conservative and smaller
differences will be found significant.
As a final note, a fluorescent dye marker is included in the kit. This
may be of use in marking the location of a contaminant.
-------
SECTION III
EQUIPMENT AND METHODOLOGY
r
General. With the exception of a container to collect water samples,
the Hazardous Materials Detector Kit contains the necessary instrumentation,
equipment and reagents to perform all the methods described in Analytical
Procedures. This manual provides the user with an overview sufficient for
operation of the instruments. Instruments are from the Hach Chemical Company
and Hach manuals are provided as part of the detector kit package. Hach
manuals should be consulted for operation, maintenance, and servicing of
their instruments.
Power. The instruments are powered by batteries for field use. In
addition, the spectrophotometer and conductivity meter may be modified for
120 or 240 VAC operation using an adapter and cable provided with the kit.
The procedure for the conversion is described in the Hach manual. The pH
meter will operate only from the battery supply.
Batteries reouired for the kit are 1 each, 6.75 V, Mallory TR-235P. (or
equivalent), 8 each, .1.5 V size D, and 4 each 1.5 V size AA. It is recom-
mended that expendable alkaline manganese batteries be used, when available,
for economy and widest environmental range of operation. The investigator
should minimize the on-time of all instrumentation in order to conserve
battery life in the field.
Batteries may be checked by the following procedure:
(a) Set the POWER switch on the pH meter to the BATT CHECK position.
If the needle deflects beyond BAT OK, the battery is alright. Otherwise
replace the 6.75 V battery.
(b) Set the conductivity meter range switch to the BATT CHECK position.
Hold the BATT CHECK switch on the spectrophotometer face in the DR position to
check only the D size batteries. The needle should deflect beyond 83 percent.
Hold the same BATT CHECK switch in the COND position to check both the D and
AA size batteries. Again the needle should deflect 83 percent.
Batteries may be reached for servicing by unloosening the two knurled
screws and removing the spectrophotometer. Arrangement of the batteries is
shown in Figure 1.
Loading Diagram. Location of the kit components is shown in Figure 2.
The tray is easily removed by lifting the top out by one of the finger holes
and then grasping the inner partitions of the tray and lifting straight up.
Setting UP the Kit in the Field. The investigator should attempt to
find several sauare feet of flat area. A raised surface like a mound or
large rock would give greater operating comfort. The investigator may use
a layout according to his own requirements, but that shown in Figure 3 is
convenient for reaching all necessary pieces. Note that the tray top doubles
as a small work surface. The arrangement of the pH measuring components is
shown in Figure 4.
56
-------
1.5V, AA SIZE CELL
en
MALLORY TR-235R.6.75V
OR EQUIVALENT
C
w/-
/
- J +
)
[
+
"~
\ -
1 +)
1.5V, D SIZE CELL
Figure 1. BATTERY ARRANGEMENT
-------
TOP
pH ELECTRODE
INSTRUCTIONS
pH METER
.
o o o
n
ENZYME TICKETS
30 & 50 ml BEAKERS
-GRADUATE
SUBSTRATE
PLASTIC TUBES
CYANIDE TUBES
Alka-Seltzer
NitraVer V
BOTTOM
CALIBRATION SCALES
DIST. WATER SRADNS
BENZENE TUBES
JRIS BUFFER
-BUFFER, pH 7.0
BUFFER SOLUTION,
HARDNESS 1
—PHENOL REAGENT
PHENOL 2 Suifav8r IV
t
EFFERVESCENT JAR
'CHLOROFORM
FILTERS \ CELLS ' \ CENj TUBE\ FERRIC ION SOLUTION
\
SPECTROPHOTOMETER NESSLERS MECURIC THIOCYANATE
DISPENSER CAP
pH CAP
REAGENT
MercuVw 2
nyc U1DVCD
UTt MMKRtK
SOAP-
ELECTRODE
SOLUTION"
DUCT. PROBE "
^
^» r^»-
•,
•
^+
f \
•-
•-
•
9-
+-.
CUPPERS
FILE
TRAY
BEAKERCLIP ELECTRODE CUP
SCREWDRIVER
BRUSH
ELECTRODE STAND
FILTER HOLDER
DROPPING PIPETTE
O
-TRAY TOP
Figure 2. LOADING DIAGRAM
58
-------
KIT
TRAY TOP
TRAY
Figure 3. TYPICAL FIELD SETUP
ELECTRODE CLIP
STAND
30 ml BEAKER
Figure 4. pH MEASURING COMPONENTS
59
-------
pH dieter. Hang the 30 ml beaker on the edge of the case using the
beaker clip as shown in Figure 4. Stand the support rod, with the electrode
spring clip in place, in the vertical hole located inside, the left front
corner of the case. Remove the wetting cap from the electrode and replace
with the plastic bulb protector. Install the electrode in the spring clip
and set at a suitable height to reach into the beaker. Fill the beaker with
distilled water to start the electrode soaking immediately. The liquid
junction must always be below the water level. After about 10 minutes, fill
the beaker with 25 ml of pH 7.0 buffer and immerse the electrode again. Set
the TEMP dial to the approximate solution temperature and turn the POWER
switch to the ON position. Adjust the STANDARDIZE switch to read exactly
7.0 and turn the power off. Discard the buffer, rinse the electrode and soak
in distilled water. The instrument is ready for use.
The above procedure performed dailv is adequate for field use. For more
exacting standardization on a less frequent basis refer to the Hach manual.
Conductivity Meter. The conductivity probe requires no conditioning and
is readied for use by plugging into the PROBE INPUT socket and inserting the
Conductivity Meter Scale into the meter. The probe is submersed in water
sample sufficient to cover the vent holes. The RANGE switch is placed in the
"5" position and is worked down until an on-scale reading is obtained. If
the reading is in the lower 10 percent of the scale, the next lower RANGE
position should be used.
Spectrophotometer. The Hach Spectrophotometer is designed to be used
with insertable meter scales which are provided. (If the operator wishes to
devise his own analytical procedures, he may prepare calibration scales fol-
lowing instructions in the Hach manual and using blank meter scales available
for this purpose.)
The Spectrophotometer should be adjusted to zero before each use, but
need not be done so before each test. Using a- right-to-left reading meter
scale, hold the light switch in the ZERO CHECK position and use the ZERO
ADJUST knob to set the meter needle to the extreme left mark of the scale.
Each time the Spectrophotometer is used the proper meter scale is
inserted and the wavelength is set. A sample cell containing a blank pre-
pared as described in the procedures is inserted and, after turning the
instrument on, the LIGHT CONTROL switch is ad.iusted to zero on the meter
scale. Once the instrument is zeroed, a cell containing the true sample is
placed in the Spectrophotometer. The instrument is turned on and the meter
reading is noted. All readings with the instrument should be sufficiently
long to obtain a stable reading, still the on-time should be kept to a
minimum to prolong battery life.
In those instances where the concentration of a component is so high as
to run off scale, a dilution should be made. The 1 ml dropping pipet and
the 25 ml graduate may be used for this purpose. The scale reading will then
be multiplied by the dilution factor.
Filter Assembly. In making spectrophotometric determinations with the
exception of turbidity measurement, filtered water samples are used. Because
gravity filtration is too slov.1, the assembly shown in Figure 5, for which
glass fiber filters are provided, is used to quickly obtain clear samples.
Filter changes are easily made using the flat ended tweezers.
60
-------
It may be desirable in some instances to save the filter discs in order
to use the color accummulated on them as a means to monitor contamination
in this use, of course, each disc would be used only once and with a specified
volume of water.
It is important that samples be filtered only when indicated Many
contaminants may be in the form of slicks, solids or emulsions and their
removal prior to analysis in procedures such as the spot test may grossly
affect the result of the test.
Effervescent Jar. The Effervescent Jar assembly (Figure 6) is used to
detect contaminants in water which may be expelled by an effervescent material.
Alka-SeltzerP. tablets are used for effervescence and Bendfx-Gastec benzene
analyzer tubes, which are sensitive to a variety of contaminants are used as
tne detector.
The jar is filled to the level mark with the water sample (about 80 ml)
The triangular file is used to score and remove the tips of an analvzer tube.
Ilr Sn ni'u clMnSent?dJn tf?e cap asserTlbly with arrow pointing away from the
jar. An Alka-SeltzerR tablet is dropped into the jar and the cap ouickly and
snugly screwed on. The test is allowed to continue until effervescence ceases.
Caution should be taken not to drive water droplets into the analyzer
tube since this would inhibit the reaction.
Chromatographic Tube Test. Kitagawa detector tubes included in the kit
are miniature Chromatographic columns impregnated with reagents to detect
Til VJ Wat|[' The tr1an9ular f11e ^ used to score and remove the" tips
of the tube. The tube is stood with the red ball pointed up) in a depth of
1-2 cm of water sample (Figure 7). As the water is drawn up the tube by
capillary action, a blue stain will form on the silica gel if cyanide is
present. •
The enzyme ticket (Figure 8) contains glass fiber spots
impregnated with horse serum cholinesterase. When wetted with pH 8 0 Tris
buffer, or neutral water not containing a cholinesterase inhibitor, 'the
enzyme becomes active and will change the color of the orange color substrate
to blue. If the enzyme is exposed to a cholinesterase inhibitor such as
certain insecticides, rodenticides or some other toxic materials it is
inactivated and unable to change the color of the substrate. One end of 'the
ticket is immersed in the water sample and the other is used as a control.
Data Sheets. Forms shown in Figure 9 are provided with the kit and may
be used for recording and reporting data.
General Maintenance. For specific maintenance and servicing problems
regarding instrumentation refer to the Hach manuals. As a matter of general
upkeep, some common sense approaches to the equipment will be helpful' "
Obviously, delicate instrumentation requires gentle handling; drons arid
severe jarring should be avoided. It may be desirable to pass a wire loop
around the battery clips to prevent the cells from "popping" out.
61
-------
FILTER HOLDER
TYGON TUBE
Figure 5. FILTER ASSEMBLY
SYRINGE
DETECTOR TUBE
CONNECTOR
-* 4 OZ. JAR
Figure 6. EFFERVESCENT JAR ASSEMBLY
(12
-------
50 ml BEAKER
CYANIDE DETECTOR TUBE
Figure 7. CHROMATOGRAPHIC TUBE TEST
2) SOAK IN WATER SAMPLE
DROPPER
U ADD THIS BUFFER
ENZYME TICKET
50 ml BEAKER
SUBSTRATE
ADD SUBSTRATE
Figure 8. CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITOR TEST
-------
FIGURE 9
DATA SHEET FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DETECTOR KIT
GENERAL ASSESSMENT SPOT TESTS
Choi.
Sample Time Location Appearance Col. Water Col. Matter Inhib. Benzene H'vy Metals Phenol Cyanide
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
RELATIVE MEASUREMENT TESTS
Conduct. Turbidity Nitrate, N? Color Sulfate Phosphate Ammonia, N? Chloride
Sample pH umhos/cm. FTU mg/1 APHA Units mq/1 mq/1 mq/1 mg/1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fluoride
mg/1
-------
The investigator should avoid gettino excessive amounts of water
into the kit. The electronics would he damaaed; the filter wheel of
the spectrophotometer is sensitive to extended periods of high humidity.
Certainly, in returning equipment to the kit care should be taken to
shake or wine off excess water. °n returnino to the laboratory after a
day in the field, allow the kit to stand open to dry out.
General cleaning procedures which may be applied to the conductivity
probe, electrode, cells, photocell window and filter wedqe are described
in the Hach manuals.
f"anvpof the specially fabricated plastic parts in the kjt are made
of Lucite' Protected with a touah vinvl oaint. "hile Incite is quite
strong, it may still be broken. In this event the broken pieces should
be held in contact while a snail amount. of methvlene chloride is made to
flow into the crack with a small syrinae. Thp pieces will bond immediately
and in a few hours will be as strona as new.
Check List Before Hpino to the Field. TH? following should be used as
a check list in the laboratory before takinn the kit to the field.
(a) Check loadino diaqram to assure that all eauinment and reaaents
are present. If more use of some reanents is anticipated, they should be
brought in an additional container.
(b) Perform prescribed battery checks, and replace weak batteries
where necessary.
(c) Check function (not standardize1) rf the oH meter, conductivity
meter, and spectrophotometer.
-------
SECTION IV
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
This section contains detailed procedures for the analysis of
contaminants in water. The arrangement is made to correspond with the
data sheet provided with the kit. Ouestions regarding equipment and
its use should be referred to the previous section.
General Assessment
(a) APPEARANCE
Describe the water sample with respect to color, turbidity, suspended
matter, slicks, etc.
(b) COLOR OF FILTERED WATER
Apparatus: Filter Assembly
Procedure: Filter 50 ml of the water sample. Record the visual color
of the filtered water and save a samnle in a clastic test tube for reference.
Save the olass fiber filter for Procedure 3.
(c) COLOR OF SUSPENDED MATTER
Record the color of the natter collected on the glass fiber filter in
the previous step. Save the filter for reference.
Spot Tests
(d) CHPLINESTERASF INHIBITORS
Reagents: Enzyme Tickets
Tris Ruffer, pH a.n
Substrate
Procedure:
1. Add about 20 ml of water samnle to the 50 nl beaker.
2. Remove an enzyme ticket from the plastic sleeving. Add several
drops of Tris Buffer to the test spot on the round end of the ticket and
1 ml to the beaker.
3. Stir the buffered v/ater sample using the sguare end of the ticket;
then allow the ticket to stand in the beaker (souare end down), being care-
ful not to wet the test spot on the round end (blank) with the water sample.
Allow to stand for 5 minutes.
66
-------
4. Remove the ticket from solution; shake off the excess water.
5. Add several drops of Substrate to each test spot and allow the
blue color to develop.
6. At the end of about 2 minutes, the round end (Mank) should he
blue. Compare with the square end (test sample) of the ticket. If the
square end is significantly different, i.e., no blue or only the very
siightest blue, a contaminant, probably an anticholinesterase type, may
be present.
(e) BENZENE
Apparatus: Effervescent Jar Assembly
p
Reagents: Alka-Seltzer ' Tablets
Benzene Analyzer Tubes
Procedure:
1. Fill the Effervescent Jar to the level mark with the water sample.
2. Score the tips of a Benzene Analyzer Tube with the trianqular file
and remove.
3. Insert the tube into the tubina of the jar can assembly with the
arrow oointed away from the cap.
p
4. Add one Alka-Seltzer' tablet to the .iar, screw the cap on
immediately and allow the effervescence to no to comoletion.
5. Examine the analyzer tube for an oranae, tan, brown, or qreenish
discoloration of the white silica gel. Since the tube is designed for air
testing the concentration has no relation to water. However, the length
of the stain may be recorded as a relative index of contamination.
(f) HEAVY METALS
Apparatus: Plastic Test Tube with On
Bottle Cap Disoenser
Reagents: Tris Buffer, pH 8.0
Chloroform
MercuVer 2 Powder
Procedure:
1. Add 2 ml of Tris Buffer, oH 8.0 to a new olastic test tube. Fill
to the "WATER LEVEL" mark with the water sample; cap and shake to mix.
2. Add 1 ml of chloroform.
TM
3. Assemble the MercuVer 2 reagent .iar with the bottle cap dispenser;
67
-------
add 1 shot to the test tube.
4. Shake for 30-40 seconds.
5. A negative test is indicated by the blue-green coloration of
the lower chloroform layer. A significantly different color such as
Dink, deep purple, yellow or orange indicates a positive test for
contamination. Any questionable samoles should be compared with a
distilled water blank.
(g) PHENOL
Apparatus: 40 ml Glass-stopoered Centrifuge Tube
Reagents: Buffer Solution, Hardness 1
Phenol Reagent Powder Pillows
Phenol 2 Powder Pillows
Chloroform
Procedure:
1. Fill the centrifuge tube to the 25 ml mark with the water sample.
2. Add 1 ml of Buffer Solution, Hardness 1 and mix.
3. Add the contents of a Phenol Rpaqent Powder Pillow; stopper and
shake to dissolve. Ignore any precipitate which may form in the aqueous
layer.
4. Add the contents of a Phenol 2 Powder Pillow; stopper and shake
to dissolve.
5. Add 1 ml of chloroform and shake for 30-40 seconds.
6. An orangish to brown color or a rose to purple color in the
chloroform layer indicates a positive test. A clear deep yellow color
is negative. (If there is any doubt a blank nay be run using distilled
water.)
(h) CYANIDE
Reagents: Cyanide Ion Hetector Tube
Procedure:
1. Fill the 50 ml beaker with 15-20 ml of water sample.
2. Score the tips of the Cvanide Inn Hetector Tube with the triangular
file and remove the tips.
3. Stand the tube (red-nreen end down) in the beaker; the red dot is
pointed upward.
4. Allow the water sample to chromatograph up the tube.
5. A separation of a blue stain up the tube indicates the orescence
of cyanide. Other contaminants may cause the separation of a yellow, tan,
or gray stain on the column.
68
-------
Relative Measurement Tests
(1) PH
Apparatus: pH Meter
Reagent: Buffer, pH 7.0
Procedure:
1. Set up the pH Meter assembly and soak the electode in distilled
water for at least 10 minutes before using. The liquid function must
always be below the water level.
2. Standardize the meter using Buffer, pH 7.0. Rinse the electrode
thoroughly with distilled water.
3. Fill the beaker with the water sample and immerse the electrode.
4. Set the TEMP control to the approximate temperature of the sample.
5. Turn the POWER switch to the ON nosition. Record the pH value.
6. Turn the pH Meter off; rinse the electrode with distilled water
and soak again.
(j) CONDUCTIVITY
Apparatus: Conductivity Meter with the Conductivity weter Scale in
place
Procedure:
1. Set the RANGE switch to position 5.
2. Plug the probe assembly into the 5 pin receptacle marked PROBE
INPUT in the Spectrophotometer panel.
3. Immerse the probe in the water sample in the 50 ml beaker, or
sampling container, sufficient to cover the vent holes.
4. Select the appropriate range beginning at the highest and working
down. Each range on the meter scale corresponds to an equivalent range
position. If the reading is in the lower 10 oercent of the scale, switch
to the next lower position.
5. Record the specific conductance in jjt mhos/cm.
6. Return the RANGE switch to off.
(k) TURBIDITY
Apparatus: Spectrophotometer set at 450 nm with the Turbidity Meter
Scale in place
69
-------
Procedure:
1. Using a sample cell filled with a filtered water sample adjust
the Spectrophotorneter to read zero units using the LIGHT CONTROL.
2. Replace the filtered water sample with a second sample cell
containing the unfiltered water sample. Record formazan turbidity
units (FTU).
3. Turn the Spectrophotometer off.
(1) NITRATE NITROGEN
Apparatus: Spectrophotmeter set at 500 nm with the Nitrate Nitrogen
Meter Scale in olace
n
Reagents: NitraVer V Nitrate Powder Pillows
Procedure:
1. Use the graduate to add 25 ml of filtered water sample to a
sample cell.
R
2. Add the contents of one NitraVer V pillow to the sample cell,
stopper and shake vigorously for 1 minute, ft nositive test is indicated
by an amber color. Allow 4-6 minutes for maximum color development.
3. Using a sample cell filled with filtered but untreated water
sample adjust the LIGHT CONTROL to give a reading of zero units on the
SoectroDhotometer.
4. Replace with the cell containing the treated water sample.
Record nitrate nitrogen in mg/2.
5. Turn the Spectrophotometer off.
(m) COLOR
Apparatus: Spectrophotometer set at the "F" oosition with the
Color Meter Scale in olace
Procedure:
1. Using a sample cell filled with distilled water adjust the
Spectrophotometer to read zero units using the LIGHT CONTROL.
2. Replace the distilled water with a sample cell containing the
filtered water sample. Record units of color.
3. Turn the Soectroohotometer off.
70
-------
(n) SULFATE
Apparatus: Spectrophotometer set at 450 nm with the Sulfate Meter
Scale in place
p
Reagents: SulfaVer IV Powder Pillows
Procedure:
1. Add 25 ml of filtered water sample to a sample cell usinq the
graduate.
2. Add the contents of one SulfaVerR IV nil low to the cell and
swirl to mix. A white turbidity indicates a positive test. Allow the
turbidity to develop for 5-10 minutes.
3. Using a sample cell filled with distilled water adjust the
Spectrophotometer to read zero units usinq the LIGHT CONTROL.
4. Replace with the cell containing the water sample. Record sulfate
in
5. Turn the Spectrophotoneter off.
(o) PHOSPHATE
Apparatus: Soectrophotometer set at 700 nm with the Phosphate Meter
Scale in place
Reagents: PhosVerR III Powder Pillows
Procedure:
1. Add 25 ml of the filtered water sample to a sample cell using the
graduate.
D
2. Add the contents of one PhosVer III nillow and swirl to mix. A
positive test is indicated by a blue-violet color. Allow 1-2 minutes for
development.
3. Using a sample cell filled with distilled water adjust the
Spectrophotometer to read zero units usinq the LIGHT CONTROL.
A. Replace with the cell containing the water sample. Record phosphate
in mg/a.
5. Turn the Spectrophotometer off.
71
-------
(p) AMMONIA NITROGEN
Apparatus: Soectroohotometer set at 425 nm with the Armenia Nitrogen
Meter Scale in place
Reagents: Nesslers Reagent
Procedure:
1. Use the graduate to add 25 ml of distilled water to a sample cell.
2. Use the graduate to add 25 ml of filtered water samole to a
second sample cell.
3. Add 1 ml of of N°sslers Reagent to each cell and swirl to mix.
Ammonia nitrogen is indicated by a yellow color. Allow to stand for 5-10
minutes for maximum color development.
4. Using the sample cell containina distilled water adjust the
Spectroohotometer to read zero units using the LIGHT CONTROL.
5. Replace with cell containing the water sample. Record ammonia
nitroqen in mg/z.
6. Turn the Spectrophotometer off.
Note: Some types of contaminants may cause a precipitate with this
reaction. While it need not be measured it should be taken as a qualitative
indicator of contamination.
(q) CHLORIDE
Apparatus: Spectrophotometer set at 4fi3 nm with the Chloride Meter
Scale in place
Reagent: Ferric Ion Solution
Mercuric Thiocyanate
Procedure:
1. Add 25 ml of distilled water to a sample cell using a graduate.
2. Add 25 ml of filtered water sample to a second cell using a
graduate.
3. Add 1 ml of Ferric Ion Solution to each cell and swirl to mix.
72
-------
4. Add 1 ml of Mercuric Thiocyanate to each cell and swirl to mix.
A light orangish to reddish-brown color indicates a oositive test. Allov/
5-10 minutes for maximum development.
5. Using the distilled water samnle adjust the Snectrophotometer to
read zero units using the LIGHT CONTROL.
6. Replace the distilled water sample with a cell containing the
water sample. Record chloride in mg/2.
7. Turn the Soectrophotometer off.
(r) FLUORIDE
Apparatus: Soectrophotometer set at 580 nm with the Fluoride Meter
Scale in place
Reagents: SPADNS Reagent
Procedure:
1. Add 25 ml of distilled water to a sample cell using the Graduate.
2. Add 25 ml of filtered water sample to a second cell using the
graduate.
3 Add 5 ml of SPADNS Reagent to each cell and swirl to mix. At
high concentrations a bleaching of the red color may occur indicative of
a Dositive test At low concentrations this will not be perceptible
visually but can be measured with the Snectroohotometer. Allow to stand
one minute for maximum development.
4 Using the distilled water sample adjust the Snectrophotometer to
read zero units using the LIGHT CONTROL.
5. Replace with the cell containing the water samole.
fluoride in mg/2.
6. Turn the Soectrophotometer off.
73
-------
OUTLINE OF ANAYLTICAL PROCEDURES
Process
General Assessment
euAppearance
b. Color of Fil-
tered Water
c. Color of Sus-
pended Matter
Spot Tests
d.Cholinesterase
Inhibitors
e. Benzene
f. Heavy Metals
Phenol
h. Cyanide
Relative Measurement
i. PH
Describe water sample with respect to color, turbidity,
suspended matter, slicks, etc.
Filter 50 ml of water sample with the Filter Assembly.
color.
Note color of filter from previous test.
20 ml water sample+1 ml Tris Buffer, pH 8.0 in 50 ml beaker.
Wet round end of enzyme ticket with Tris Buffer.Stand square
end in beaker for 5 min. Remove add substrate to each end.
Fill effervescent jar to level mark with water sample. Pre-
pare tube (ends cemoved) in head assembly, arrow pointed out
Add Alka-Seltzer tablet to jar, cap Immediately.
Add 2ml Tris Buffer, pH 8.0 to plastic tube. Fill to level
with watan sample. Add 1 ml chloroform. Add 1 shot
MercuVer 2. Shake 30-40 sec.
Fill centrifuge tube to 25 ml mark with water sample. Add 1
ml Buffer Solution Hardness 1, 1 Phenol Reagent pillow and 1
>henol 2 pillow. Add 1 ml chloroform. Shake 30-40 sec.
Ignore ppt in water.
Add 15 ml water sample to 50 ml beaker. Cyanide tube (ends
removed) stood up in beaker, red dot up. Allow to chromato-
graph.
Soak electrode for 10 min. in distilled water. Set approxi-
mate temperature. Standardize with Buffer, pH 7.0. Measure
and record pH of water sample. Rinse electrode, soak in
distilled water.
jave reference sample in plastic tube.
Save filter for next test.
Save filter for reference.
After 2 min. round end (control)
should be blue. Positive test
if square end is white.
Allow effervescence to finish.
Positive test if white gel turns orange,
tan, brown or greenish.
Positive test (chloroform layer) is
pink, deep purple, yellow or orange.
Neqative test is blue-green or gray.
Positive test (chloroform layer) is
oranqe to brown or rose to purple.
Neqative test is deep yellow.
Blue stain if cyanide is present.
Other contaminants yellow, tan or gray.
-------
Tests
Process
Comments/Interpretation
Relative Measurements (Con't)
J!Conductivity
Plug probe into PROBE INPUT. Set RANGE to position 5.
Immerse probe in water sample to cover vent holes. Switch
to lower range until a reading is obtained. Record value.
Spectrophotometric Tests
Note:Tests requiring reagents should use water volumes measured with 25 ml
graduate. Minimize on-time of spectrophotometer. Turn off after each reading.
k. Turbidity
1. Nitrate
Nitrogen
m. Color
n. Sulfate
0. Phosphate
p. Ammonia
Nitrogen
q. Chloride
r. Fluoride
Wave
Length
450
500
F
450
700
425
463
580
blank
Cell
Filtered
Sample
Filtered
Sample
Distilled
Mater
Distilled
Water
Distilled
Water
Distilled
Water *•
Reagent
Distilled
Water +
Reagents
Distilled
Water +
Reagent
Sampl e
Cell
Unfiltered
Sample
Filtered
Sample +
Reagent
Filtered
Sample
Filtered
Sample +
Reagent
Filtered
Sample +
Reagent
Filtered
Sample +
Reagent
Filtered
Sample +
Reagents
Filtered
Sample +
Reagent
Process
Read directly, record value.
Add 1 NitraVerRV oillow.
Shake 1 min. Allow to stand 4-6 min.
Record value.
Read directly, record value.
o
Add 1 SulfaVer IV oillow. Swirl to
mix. Allow to stand 5-10 min. Record
value.
Add 1 PhosVerRIII oillow. Swirl to
mix. Allow to stand 1-2 min. Record
value.
Add 1 ml Nesslers Reagent. Swirl to
mix. Allow to stand 5-10 min. Record
value.
Add 1 ml Ferric Ion Solution. Add 1 ml
Mercuric Thiocyanate. Swirl to mix.
Allow to stand 5-10 min. Record value.
Add 5 ml SPADNS. Swirl to mix. Allow
to stand 1 m1n. Record value.
Comments/ Interpretation
Amber color indicates a
positive test.
White turbidity indicates a
positive test. Clean cell
with soap and water.
Blue-violet color indicates
positive test.
Yellow color indicates a
positive test. Ppts may
form with some contaminants.
Lt. orange to reddish brown
color indicates a positive
test.
Bleaching may occur at high
high cone, not perceptible
at low cone.
Gl
-------
SECTION V
CONSUMABLE MATERIALS
Cat No
wQ w • I1W •
2387-20
151-13
2125-99
14034-99
12065-99
1836-99
424-16
444-16
872-99
2062-32
Gastec No. 121
Description
Mercu Ver™2
Nesslers Reagent
Phos VerR III Powder Pillows
Nitra VerR V Powder Pillows
Sulfa VerR IV Powder Pillows
Phenol 2 Reagent Powder Pillows
Buffer Solution, Hardness 1
SPADNS Reagent
Phenol Reagent Powder Pillows
Reference Electrode Filling Solution
Benzene Detector Tube
Unit
1 oz.
4 02.
pkg of
100
pkg of
100
pkg of
100
pkg of
100
qt
qt
pkg of
100
2 oz.
pkg of
10
Unit
Price
$5.25
2.85
8.00
6.95
6.50
6.00
4.00
6.60
15.00
2.35
7.20
Source
Hach Chemical Co.
P.O. Box 907, Ames, IA 50010
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
Hach Chemical Co.
National Environmental Instruments, In<
P.O. Box 590, Warwick, RI 02888
8104-204
Detector Tube, Kitagawa Cyanide Ion
pkg of 15.00
10
Matheson Gas Products
P.O. Box 85, East Rutherford, NO 07073
-------
SECTION V
CONSUMABLE MATERIALS (continued)
Cat. No.
61693
Description
Prefilters, Type A Glass Fiber, 25 mm
Unit
pkg of
500
Unit
Pri ce
$15.00
Source
Gel man Instrument Co.
600 Sourth Wagner Road
FSN 6665-00-909-
3647
Shell Container, Clear cellulose acetate,
3/8 in. diam x 3-% in. length
Printing for above, single line 1/32 in.
wide around circumference 1-3/16 in. from
top (open end) and the words "WATER LEVEL"
in parallel slightly above the line.
Plug, natural polyethylene, for 3/8 in.
diameter shell container
Refill Kit, Chemical Agent Detector,
ABC-M30A1
1000
1000
1000
each
Ann Arbor, MI 48106
15.72 Flex Products Corp.
445 Industrial Road
Carlstadt, NJ 07072
10.30 Flex Products Corp.
3.62 Flex Products Corp.
20.57 Headquarters, ARMCOM
AMSAR-MMD-L
Rock Island, IL 61201
Buffer, pH 7.0
Chloroform
Dye Marker
Liquid Soap (Phosphorous - free)
Chemical Supply House
Chemical Supply House
Chemical Supply House
Chemical Supply House
-------
SECTION V
CONSUMABLE MATERIALS (continued)
Cat. No.
oo
Description
Alka-SeltzerR (Without Aspirin)
Battery, 6.75 V, Mallory TR-235R
Battery, 1.5 V, D Size, Alkaline
Battery, 1.5 V, AA Size, Alkaline
Distilled Water
Tris Buffer, pH 8.0
Ferric Ion Solution
Mercuric Thiocyanate Solution
Unit
Unit
Price
pkg of
20
each
each
each
$ .60
5.85
1.00
.75
Source
Drugstore
Electronic Supply House
Electronic Supply House
Electronic Supply House
Laboratory
Laboratory
Laboratory
Laboratory
-------
REFERENCES
Silvestri, A., Goodman, A., McCormack, L. M., Razulls, M. K., Jones, A. R.,
Jr. and Davis, M. E. P. Development of a Kit for Detecting Hazardous
Material Spills in Waterways. Interagency Agreement No. EPA-IAG-0546.
Chemical Systems Laboratory, ARRADCOM, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010.
Hach Direct Reading Engineer's Laboratory, Model DR-EL/2, Methods Manual.
Laboratory pH Meter, Model 1975 and 2075.
79
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
|1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/2-78-055
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
M. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
\ Development of a Kit for Detecting Hazardous Material
\ Spills in Waterways
5. REPORT DATE
March 1978 issuing date
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
57. AUTHOR(S)
A. Silvestri, A. Goodman, L.M. McCormack, M. Razulis,
A.R. Jones, Jr., and M.E.P. Davis
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Chemical Detection and Alarms Branch
Chemical Systems Laboratory
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1BB610
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
EPA-IAG-0546
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
industrial Environmental Research Lab. - Cinti, OH
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/12
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
Chemical Systems Laboratory, under a program sponsored by the Environmental Protection
Agency, Edison, N.J. has developed a kit to detect hazardous material spills into
waterways. The purpose of the program was to develop a man-portable field kit able to
detect (not necessarily identify) as many contaminants in water in as low a concen-
tration as possible.
A list of compounds, representative of potential contaminants, was used to evaluate
commercial, military and specially designed procedures which have application to water
testing. Following the original screening, promising methods were further evaluated
against samples of natural waters polluted in the laboratory with compounds from the
model list. It was concluded that a selection of 15 multiple non-specific detection
systems could be organized into a detection concept which would detect a significant
portion of potential contaminants. A "paper analysis" projected that about 85% of
potential contaminants would respond to at least one detection parameter.
A field kit was designed containing a spectrophotometer, conductivity meter, pH meter
and a variety of accessory equipment and reagents. Prototype kits were fabricated
and delivered to Environmental Protection Agency along with engineering drawings,
parts lists and manuals.
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COS AT I Field/Group
Hazardous Materials, Detection, Kits,
Chemical Analysis, Water Pollution
Water Analysis, Spot Tests
Hazardous Materials
Spill Detection
68D
8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
88
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
80
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: I 978-757-HO/6805 Region No. 5-I I
------- |