Fall 2000
Region III Strategic Planning Meeting
October 17-18, 2000
           I Acid Mine Drainage
           	*
         0
*
            •o
Sprawl
                 Air Toxics
                                                    Stressed Estuaries

-------
This report was produced by the Office of Environmental Data (OED) with the help
of several Regional program offices  for the Strategic Planning Meeting held on
October 17-18,2000.  The purpose of the report was to characterize the
environmental issues in the Region.  Each Division/Office presented their top
 ssues, which OED supplemented and integrated into this report.

                 Authors:   Cheryl Atkinson
                           John Graves
                           Stu Kerzner
                           Louvinia Madison
                           Al Morris (Office Director)
                           Richard Paiste

Program Contributors: Kyle Zieba, Rich  Batiuk, Connie Carr, Len Mangiaracina,
Alice Chow, Deb Forman, Paul Dressel, Tom Slenkamp, Pat Bradley, Charlie App,
Sue Canning, Hank Zygmunt, Virginia Thompson, Jim Gerhardt (USGS), Ron Landy,
Gerallyn Vails, Mike Slimak, Reggie Harris, Kelly Eisenman. Scott Phillips.
                     OFFICE OF E

-------
                                                Our Environmental Story
                                                Sprawl Issues
Fall Planning Meeting
October  17- 18,2000
                                                Air Quality Update
                                                Air Toxics
                                                Air Monitoring
                                                Water Quality Update
                                                Water Quality Monitoring
                                                Acid Impacts
                                                Contaminated Sediments
                                                AFO/CAFO
                                                TMDLs
                                                Some Urban Issues
                                                Enforcement/Targeting
                                                Cross-Program Linkages
                                                Summary

-------
B

-------
Our Environmental Story

-------
Established Programs are Doing Their Jobs:

Major Successes in Targeting Pollutants:

       Air - Criteria Pollutants Mostly Controlled
            ( Carbon Monoxide, Sulfur Dioxide,
              NOx, Particluate Matter, Ozone, Lead)

       Water - DO, Nutrients, Toxics, Fecal Coliform
               are Reduced in Waterways & Estuaries
       Hazardous Waste Site Clean-ups Increased
           - 95 Construction Completions

-------
                Serious  Reductions Made in  4  of 6 Common Air Pollutants
        Carbon Monoxide Air Levels Have Dropped Significantly
Parts/Million (ppm)

10
                   CO Standard = 9
                                          Good
          Sulfur Dioxide Levels are Far Below the Standard

    Parts per million
                        SOx Standard = 0.03 ppm
  0.03
 0.025
  0.02
 0.015
  0.01
 0.005
                                    Good
                                                                                    Regional Lead Air Levels are Declining
 micrograms per cubic meter

  2
                                                                     1.5
                                                                     0.5
                                                                                      Lead standard = 1.5 mcrograrrB per cubic meter
                                                                                    More effective air
                                                                                    monitoring
                                                                                    dectected higher lead
                                                                                    levels
                                                                                      TSP & PM-10: Less Dust & Soot in Air
80


70



60


50



40


30



20
  TSP Standard

: 75 rrrfcr osrama/cutoic meter
b WW & ««>.iSs.e[J*«*<»«$SS
-------
                                Successes  in  Water
      Striped Bass Population has Increased in
                the Chesapeake Bay
Slllped H.»« Spawn Index

»0
Summer Oxygen Levels in the Delaware River
        Now Support Aquatic Life
                    I Spawning Slock Bton»» (SSB)
                                                                                     M.tcui Hook
      Improved Water Quality in the Susquehanna River
               Fostered the Shad's Return
    /Number of fish lifted
    \across the Conowingo Dam
The Shad Have Returned to the Delaware River
                                                          Oxygen level
                                                                                         Number o) Shad (thousands)
                                                                            y ^ .»*./ y s s /•
                                                                            Oxygen L_J Shad

-------
              Superfund Sites Construction Completions Increased
                             Superfund Sites
Number Superfund Sites
100
 90

 80

 70

 60

 50

 40

 30

 20

 10
     #  &  *s  <£  **  <£
#   cf>   ^   «(\
o^   qA   o?>   of>   ^

-------
   DO Levels Still a Concern in the Bays & Other Estuaries
          PA
                                20 -
                                     Dissolved Oxygen Conditions
                                    Chesapeake Bay
                                                 Delaware Bay



                                            Good D Impacted • Severly Impacted
Coastal Bays
0  13 30

-------
                  Estuarine Living Resources Stressed
           PA
                                    Condition of Benthic Community
                                  % Area
                                   100 r
                                    80
                                    60
                                    40
                                    20
                                        Chesapeake Bay
                                                     Delaware Bay
                                                Good D Impacted H Severly Impacted
Coastal Bays
kfloaeteo
0  13  30

-------
                          Wetlands
          Wetlands Loss in Region III
                   1950s -1970s
Wetlands Loss (Thousands of Acres)
60 (
               DE • MD • WVA
40

20

 0

-20

-40

-60

-80
                          PA
                                 20,000 Acres of Wetlands Lost in the Chesapeake Watershed
                                                             1982-1989

                                Wetlands (Thousands of Acres)
                                10
              IH VA
       i
     Coastal
                i
                         i
                                 Q

                                 -5

                                -10

                                -15

                                -20
Inland Gain   Inland Loss    Pond Gain
                                     i
                                     DE
                                                        l
                                                       MD
PA
i      i      i
VA    WVA CB Watershed
      Increase in Wetlands = Increased Likelihood of Meeting WQS

      Regional Wetlands Data is 20 years old
               Need Updated Monitoring & Better Tracking
               - Work w/ MAIA Program
               - Update Region's Wetland Status/Trends Report
      Regional Support for Restoration Efforts

-------
           Despite Improvement in Meeting Water Quality Standards,
           Biological Indicators are Stressed Throughout the Region
1/3 of Streams in MAIA Region
     in Poor Condition
> 1/2 of Susquehanna Streams
     in Fair - Poor Condition
      Criterion: Fish

3/4 of Pennsylvania Streams
   in Fair - Poor Condition
                                      % Stream Miles
       Criterion: Fish

   1/2 of Maryland Streams
      in Poor Condition
 Criterion: Benthic Insects
Criteria: Fish & Benthic Insects

-------
Birds, Ecological Condition & Land Use are Linked
                                                           Mid-Atlantic Bird
                                                          Community Scores
As Ecological Conditions Change, Bird Population Changes

 43% Watershed Area has Good/Excellent Ecological Community

 21% Watershed Area has Poor Ecological Community

  Diverse Bird Community Changes Occurs when:
            - Agriculture > 60% of Watershed, or
            - Urban > 30% of Watershed


  • Action for Urban Livability & Sprawl Initiatives

   •   Forest - maintain current land cover and try to maintain green corridors between forested
             areas;

   •   Mixed Forest/Rural areas - restore forest where possible, develop in the context of
            surrounding landscape, maintain green ways between and around communities, and
            guide development into areas of poorer ecological condition;

   •   Urban Areas - remove barriers to redevelopment, and encourage areas of small parks with
            trees and  shrubs;

   •   AH Areas -- Inspire the general public to observe the birds and learn about how their
            activity impacts the bird populations.  Enlist "birders" to do surveys to track
            changes and share their results in schools and with the media.

-------
We've Come a Long Way, but There's Still More Work to Do:
    Safe & Sustainable Environment for People & Ecosystems
    are Still Being Stressed

    Our traditional approach needs to emphasize cross-program
    & cross-agency innovative approaches

    They often fall outside traditional roles, regulations, &
    practices needed to solve our new chalieges

            eg., sprawl, cities/urban, estuaries,
               air & water toxics, monitoring

-------
         Three Major Causes of Habitat Loss/Degradation in Region III
         West - Resource Extraction
                                                                     East - Urban Sprawl
4,505 Stream Miles Affected
by Acid Mine Drainage

 Total Stream Miles -155,767
   Maryland -164
   Pennsylvania - 3,158
   Virginia-18
   West Virginia-1,164
                 Forest Fragmentation Wide-Spread
                  Leads to Habitat Degradation
                                                    BROWN TROUT
                                                     DISAPPEAR
BJOTC IWTEG«TY
 FAIR or POOR
ONLY HAROY REPTILES
   A AMPrtPlANS
                                                        LOW
                                                                    % IMPERVIOUS COVER
                                                                                        HIGH
                                                         	

-------

-------
Sprawl The Cause Of It All

-------
 Why Should EPA Care About
              Sprawl?

 Water Pollution/Water Quality
 Air Pollution
 Loss of Habitat, Forest, Wetlands &
 Farmland
 Environmental & Economic Cost of
 Infrastructure
Source: EPA Center for Sustainability

-------
        Increased Road Density  and Auto
              ^is Impacting the Region III
       fl Source Category
    B
     Dominates Amb.ent
     wr concentrations
        Region ii
                          • Major

                          • Area and Other

                          IHOnroad Mobile
  Trichloi

Polycyclic Organic flatter

  Perchloroethylene

  Methylene Chloride

Formaldehyde - Primary

    Benzene

  A c ro le in • P rim a ry

Acetaldehyde - Primary

  1,3-Dichloropropene

   1,3-Butadiene
               0   0.2   0.4  0.6  0.8  1   1.2
                  Annual Average Ambient Concetration (ug/m3)

Source: 1996 NATA Modeled Ambient Air Data (minus background)
                                             Road Density in Region III
                                        Source: EPA/ORD: An Ecological Assessment of the
                                        United States Mid-Atlantic Region, November 1997.

-------
   Forest Fragmentation is High in the
         Eastern Part of Region III
Fragmentation . . .
•  has adverse impact on
  habitat & aquatic life
•  Increases stream bank
  erosion & sedimentation
  Increases storm water
  flows
                   Source: MAIA
                                            iVrin A Forest
                                          Cragjnentation Index


                                               ]3
                                             ZZ]4

-------
           Sprawl  will continue to increase in Region III
 Population Expected to Grow by 14% in 25 Years      The Number of Houses has Increased by 16% Since 1980
1950
1985
  2025
 Number of Vehicles Has Increased by 86% Since 1970
                                 20.5 Million
                                   Vehicles
11 Million
  Vehicles
           WVA
1980

1990
1996
                               Farmland Decreased by 33% Since 1964
 1970
1980
1997
 1964
 1980
  1997

-------
        Region III Areas of Concern
                                              Projected Areas of Sprawl as
                                                   Defined by

                                               AFT, CBP, ESD ,ORD
                                                       1 of 4
                                                    	 2of4
                                                      ]3of 4
                                                      I 4 of 4
Sources: American Farm Trust (AFT), CBP Land Growth & Stewardship Subcommittee (CBP), ESD
Recommendation for Sprawl Pilot Areas (ESD), ORD Modeled Areas (ORD)

-------
          ^^•teBr
Enhanced sea-level rise almost certainly
will occur, with the potential for substantial
damage to the coastal zone's structures,
wetlands and estuaries and to water
supplies because of salt water intrusion" -
Preparing For A Changing Climate, Mid-
Atlantic Overview, March 2000

-------









EXPLANATION

Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain
    aquifer system

Line o f hyd rogeo log ic sectio n
                                                                              -
                                                       w*T^t!?fr?^y*H           ^:,
                                                   rnrtK            - •       •• -*- •
                                                   '.-"•.--;.:. .*',.. C-.


                                                   ,  ,

                                               &€
                                   -fHi  jS^M^JKTfi ^i,  , -- -«^*t-
                                   '    . Jtf .., ^ * ., .  . ^J. . •* - 1 -• .  t - • • ^^£:
                              1—•  •*•" "A^4  ——i..
                                   ixlj_  ^^  c
                                f ^3^»	=*-^^J^J...; >- ;   I
frw X#&*
 &V

-------
       Population Growth Impacting
                 Coastal Areas
  Population increase 40%
  from 1960 to 1994
  Vulnerability to Weather
  Damage
  Destruction of Natural
  Filtering Capacity
  Wetlands
  -  \
*  *•.., :>>
   ^ ^i _-^^
Source: Kyle Zieba & Definition of costal counties defined by NOAA.

-------



                 ;*  ,?









Land surface


Freshwater

-------












     120
O   10O
=J<
SQ
~z. ^
~ D_

< -5
     80
o: —i
Q<
      20
      1860
                                                  Withdrawal
                                                            1
                                            Population
                  1900
192D
194O

  YEAR
I960
1980
                                                                           (Estimate)
                                                                                      2,500 POO
                                                                                      2.000 JOOO
                                                                                      1,300.000
                                                                                               O
                                                                                               Q.
                                                                                      1,000.000 O
                                                                                      soo.ooo
                                                                               I
2OOO

-------
Estimated Pre-Pumping
Water-Level Elevations
 in the Lower Potomac
        Aquifer

  •eastward flow
  •discharge along coast
  •localized discharge to
  Potomac River
  •above sea level
  •low hydraulic
  gradient (5-ft interval)
  =>slow flow rates
  •pre-pumping flow
  directions uncertain
Washington C
                        Delavara
                             *<••.
                       Maryland  *•
              -v! - ."•
            •-V-_*i'l    ^^^  o
                 -^-   '
                                                      30 KILOMETERS

-------
  Measured Modern
 (1990's) Water Levels
 in the Lower Potomac
        Aquifer
•actual measured water
levels
 flow to pumping centers
•region-wide lowering
below sea level
=>increased pumping costs
•high hydraulic gradient
(50-ft interval)
=>rapid flow rates
=>threat of saltwater
intrusion
-^u
-J
if
                      i
                      I
Delaware
                      Maryland

-------

*
                                                               Q   -    •
 State Hwy £06
                                                        r 1    -
                                                           .

                        SOUTHERN MARYLAND WOOD TREATING
                                                 PATUX EN TRIVER NAVAL Al R ST AT ION |
                                                                                    ~-..
                               •.'


-------



-------
          Using the Above Approach Give. Examples of Potential Sites in WY
Abandoned Mine Sites
      HEF
      IRW
      PWAI
      PWHC

-------

Professional Paper 1612
                               Chesapeake
                                   Bay
                                         Virginia
                                         Beach

-------
The breccia remaining in
crater has ground water 1.5
times saltier than seawater






-------
Continuing water use will continue to stress
aquifers

Salt water intrusion and contaminant
migration are possibilities

Potentiometric contours may help predict
future water quality problems in large ground
water sources

Special case: Water supply development may
be further limited due to the buried crater in
the Chesapeake Bay

Expanded use of USGS products

-------
                                           The Problems  of
                                 American Cites  are Not New
 "We will neglecnour cities at our peril,
\ for in neglecting them we neglect the
 nation.'

   - President John F. Kennedy 1963
 "There is a clear and compelling
 requirement for better coordination of
federally funded programs, particularly
 those designed to benefit the residents of
 the inner city.'

  Report of the National Advisory
 Commission on Civil Disorders, 1976
       Source: Rene A. Henry, Director, Office of
       Communication & Government Relations
                                         "In the last 10 years, 90% of the growth tool place in the
                                         suburban areas beyond the city limits. In the next 20 years,
                                         we expect the 80% of the total increase will take place in
                                         the suburban areas rather than the central city."
                                         L.N. Werner, before a U.S. Senate Subcommittee, 1967
                                         "By 1960, inflated land cost were threatening to price
                                         good housing clear out of the market. Main causes . . .
                                         Include: speculation, over-zoning and excessive
                                         improvement requirements and fragmentation of acreage
                                         into holding too small for economic development."

                                                   House & Home 1962

-------
     romoting the Idea of Cities  &

                   Livability
   Commitment and Incentives Needed
    - Let the builders rebuild
    - Tax abatement to attract redevelopment
    - Stream line permitting process
    - Waiver building codes (if no impact to health& safety)
    - Eliminate water & sewer fees for high priority projects
    - Down zoning, land subsidies, flexible zoning
    - Use bonds for site acquisition
Source: Rene A. Henry, Director, Office of Communication & Government Relations

-------
    Region III where we are now
higl
 O
 O
 0>
 J-H
 O
 U
 03
 00
low
                 HSCD
                  MAIA
    APD,WCMD,WPD
                            CBPO
  Traditional EPA Regulatory Program
                                  Innovative EPA Program

-------
Region III, where we need to go .
    Help rebuild our cities
      Showcase grants
      Showcase successful redevelopment plans
      Promote "Better American Bonds"

    Promote Sound Land Use
      Implement "Pilot Projects on Sprawl" (i.e., innovative approaches
      to regulatory programs)
      Focus Regional Programs and Activities in Sprawl Areas

-------

-------
     Air Quality
•Status of Region III Air Pollutants
'A/r Toxics Reaffirmed as Emerging Issue
>A/r Monitoring Update

-------
            Air Quality
 Status of Regional Air Pollutants
Regional Air Problems Continue to . . .
 - come from up-wind sources
 - contribute to downwind pollution
 - be a long term problem
 - be complex and pervasive

-------
 Pollutants Causing Air Pollution Problems*
Problem/'
/'' Pollutant
/
S
Nitrogen
\^
Tfr
SulfuiVV
<( J)D>
^\
vnrvV^f
V VJ^^3(.:. -)t>
A^A
CO2 >V
<( )t>
^
Ozone
^

s/

Acid
Deposition
*
*


Eutrophi-
cation of
Ches. Bay.
^



Visibility
*
*


Particulate
Matter

^


Global
Warming
s/


^
As listed by Air Program

-------
      Region III and Surrounding States Continue to
              Have High Air Emission Densities
r^
Nitrogen
  Oxi(
                      Dioxide
        mission Density
         (Tons/sq. mile)
          D >5
            >0
PM2.5  ft      VOC
            *
                      mission Density
                       (Tons/sq. mile)
     mission Density
      (Tons/sq. mile)
      n>s
      • >2
                                               >0
mission Density
(Tons/sq. mile)
                                                         D
                                                            '
                                                           >0
Source: National Air Pollutant Emission Trends -Density Map of 1998 Emissions by County, 1900-1998,
EPA-454/R-00-002

-------
         Ozone exceedances  varies over time
                           and location
      Impact ofNOx and VOCs

  Number of Days Ozone Exceeds 8 hr.
         Std. In Region III
50-
  86 87 88  89  90 91 92 93  94  95 96 97
• Phila-Wilm-Trent,
• Washington,    CD Richmond-Peters bur
ED Baltimore      n Pittsburgh,
                                                                  o
                                                                  2
                                                                  a-
                                                                  I
                                                                      500 ppb


                                                                      115 ppb


                                                                      110 ppb


                                                                      100 ppb


                                                                      90 ppb


                                                                      184 ppb


                                                                       ppb


                                                                      0 ppb
Source: APD - Number of Days w/daily max >the
8hr. Standard (85 ppb)
                                       Source: DCM Team - 1999 - 8hr. Ozone
                                       Design Value from 1997 1999 (84 ppb)

-------
          Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay
                40 - 50% Nitrogen in Bay from the Mr
      Impact of Atmospheric Nitrogen

      Sources of
       nitrogen
 Estimated 1997
wet deposition of
    nitrogen
                                         f.3.0 3.6 -1,2 1.8 5-1 6.Q 6.6 7.2 7.8> 8v1 >3/0
Source: National Atmospheric Deposition Program, Nitrogen in the Nation's Rain, 2000

-------
  Air Quality: Status of Regional Air Pollutants
     Management Recommendation
Regional Air Quality Improvement should
  Continue to come from traditional program functions
  (regulations); with an
  Increase focus on voluntary reduction, education and
  outreach

-------

-------
         The National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA)
The 33 Air Toxics
                                          The assessment will help to;
   1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
    1,3-Butadiene
    1,3-Dichloropropene
    7-PAH
    Acetaldehyde - Primary
    Acrolein - Primary
    Acrylonitrile
    Arsenic Compounds
    Benzene
    Beryllium Compounds
    Cadmium Compounds
    Carbon Tetrachloride
    Chloroform
    Chromium Compounds
    Coke Oven Emissions
    Ethylene Dibromide
   Ethylene Dichloride
Ethylene Oxide
Formaldehyde - Primary
Hexachlorobenzene
Hydrazine
Lead Compounds
Manganese Compounds
Mercury Compounds
Methylene Chloride
Nickel Compounds
Perchloroethylene
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Polycyclic Organic Matter
Propylene Dichloride
Quinoline
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
•Identify air toxics of greatest potential
concern
•Characterize the relative contributions to air
toxics concentrations
•Set priorities for the collection of additional
air toxics data
                ^<-v./,x;s
                co
                                Source: 1996 NATA / OED

-------
             Urban Areas have highest Air Toxic Emissions
            1996 National Air Toxics Assessment
            (33 of 188 Hazardous Air Pollutants)


            Total Emissions by County
          ToiilHAPEraiisiois(TPY)

             OloSO

            I 50 lo 100

            | 100.0125

            j 125 to 150

            ] 150lo 200

            1 200 to 300

             300 to 500

             500 lo 600

             600 to750

             750 to 1250

             1250lo 2000

             2000lo 3500
Source: 1996 NATA /DCMTeam

-------
Urban  Areas  show highest Benzene  Cancer Incidence
     Benzene Cancer Incidence
     Based on Lifetime (70 yrs) Ambient Exposure
    Benzene Cancer Incidence
    Increased Incidents per County Population

      1 to 5

      5 to 10
      lOto 15
      15 to 20

    m 20 to 40
    K 40to60
    IB 60to80
      8010 100
      lOOtolSO
      15Oto17Ep

      17StoZ25

.
                                        yVr-i'

                                      J^x>--.
    Source: 1996 NATA, DCM Tfeam





-------
    Benzene and Formaldehyde Emissions Pervade
     Legend:
     height: Sum of Total Emissions
Region III States
      Total Emissions
                             Sum
                             of
                          Total Emissions
Source: 1996 NATA / OED

-------
      Air Toxics Emissions  and Their Sources - Region  III
      Top 10 Major Toxic Emissions by
                Source Category
      Benzene


Formaldehyde -Primary


 Acetaldehyde -Primary


  Methylene Chloride


     1,3-Butadiene


   Perchloroethylene


  1,3-Dichloropropene


   Acrolein -Primary


   Trichloroethylene


 Polycylic Organic Matter
D Non Road
                                              Typical Sources
                   >&
                 •^yFormaldehyde
                 O /    Benzene
                       Acetaldehyde
                                                                       automobile exhaust emissions
 Formaldehyde
lethylene ChlorideN
    Benzene
                      [ethylene Chloric
                       Formaldehyde
                       Acetaldehyde
                          5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

                          1996 Emissions ton/year
                                            stationary internal combustion en
                                            & turbines, manufacturing facilities,
                                            incinerators

                                            manufacture of drugs, Pharmaceuticals.
                                            & film coatings; electronics
                                            manufacturing; urethane loam blowing.
                                            landfills & wastewater processing

                                            oil and natural gas production,
                                            petroleum refining, burning coal and
                                            oil, gasoline service stations,'
                     electronics manufacturing

                     pulp and paper plants, petroleum
                     refineries, power plants, manufacturing
                     facilities
                                          kpulp and paper production, wa§tewaier^
                                           processing
Source: 1996 NAT A / OED

-------
Air Quality: Air Toxics Reaffirmed as Emerging
                Issue
 Management Recommendation
Air Toxics is often a local issue
Regionally they are seen as a big problem
for urban areas
This is an emerging priority

-------
         Mobile Sources  Dominate Region III
                      Toxics Emissions
 65% of Emissions Come from Mobil Sources    Mobile Sources Dominate in Urba Areas
      Non Road
       Mobile
       25%
        On road
         Mobile
          36%
    Major
    On road Mobile
 Major
 10%
Area
Non Road Mobile
30,000 -|

25,000 -

20,000

15,000

10,000 -

 5,000

    0
            Urban • Rural
                                           Major
                         Total 1996 HAP Emissions in
                          Region III = 81150 Tons
                                Area
                     On road
                     Mobile
Non Road
 Mobile
Source: 1996 NAT A / OED

-------


-------
                  Air Quality

Region III Air Monitoring Update

EPA and States do not maintain monitoring network for
air toxics as they do for the criteria pollutants. However
some type of toxic monitoring has been ongoing.
   Photochemical Air Monitoring Station (PAMS) measure air toxics
   Specialized studies for local concerns

In 1997 EPA promulgated new NAAQS for PM2.5 -
Region III currently operates 94 PM2.5 monitoring stations
   Data collected during 00/01/02 will be used for attainment of the standard

-------
            Specialized Air Toxic Studies
focus on local air
  toxics concerns
    Urban Areas
                        Allepcn/Couht
WV,KY,OH
  Tri Stat
 Philadelphia

 Chester, PA
Delaware City
  Source: BSD

-------
    First Year of PM2.5 Air Monitoring Shows
                 Some Hits in Region III
            3 years needed for attainment status
             Color:
           H> 17ug/m3
           Ql3-17ug/m3
           • <13ug/m3
75% or more in ail 4 quarters {236]
11 or more samples in each quarter
(but not 75% in alt 4) [280]
AB other sites [408J
Source: BSD using AIRS as of 7/26/00 weighted annual mean, Jan. Dec. 1999

-------
Air Quality: Air Toxics Monitoring Update
  Management Recommendation
Region III should continue to provide
technical assistance to HQ.
Region III should work w/ states to
improve/expand monitoring networks.
Mangers need to maintain awareness of air
toxics data as an emerging issue.

-------
e

-------
  Region HI Water Quality Presentation Overview

  View Results of 3 Water Quality Assessment Cycles.
@  Evaluate consistency between Assessments and TMDL listings
  Look at how sources and stressors rank in terms of severity of
  impact.

  Monitoring trends/future directions.

   TMDL Challenges and the Path to Stream Restoration

   A Closer Look at 2 Top Sources.

-------
     Stream Use Impairments Show an In ere as. j
Imp aired Miles
(th ou sand s)
                                                % of Assessed M il es Im paired
*
-\
it
— — -.
4
USE
' Outstan ding Peso urce
' Shellfish
' Fisheries
Swm ming
Aqu atic Life
- Rsh Consum ption
Drinking Wate r S upply
% Impaired
100%
100%
59%
30%
24%
1 8%
3%
                                              More sensitive ecological/human
                                              health uses.
                                                                   2000
                                                                1998
                                                            1996
Source: 19%, 1998,2000 305b Reports. 37% of Region III Stream Miles were Assessed for the FY'2000 Report.
Total Region III Stream Miles = 179,676.

-------
          Environmental Severity to^jed by Resource Extraction
          SM
              ^V&^* *~-&? V""~ v^
             ^v**^**3?
Data: '98 305b Report

-------
                                                                       .
  Sot,»ds, Metals, Pathogens,and Tox^s Lead in Severely-Impacted M**es
                                                                      ofe
                                                    Toxics and oil/grease impacts
                                                    are almost always severe.
Data: '98 305b Report

-------
1998 305b Sources of w_ .ream Impairment by State



                                               'Slate
height: Maximum of Stream Miles

-------
       Water Quality Assessment Summary

Designated Use Impairments Have Increased.

More Sensitive Uses Show Highest Degree of Impairment.

Agriculture, Stormwater and Resource Extraction are the
Leading Sources in Terms of Magnitude of Impacts.

Resource Extraction is the Leading Sources in Terms
of Severely Impacted Stream Miles.

Habitat Loss is Increasing in Impact and Significance.

Toxics Impacts have Increased and are Typically Severe.

Contaminated Sediments Harbor Significant Toxics But are
Rarely Identified as Sources of Stream Impairment.

-------


-------
Water Quality Monitoring

-------
     ,-ish Tissue Monitoring Ljverely Lags Other Type
            (Critical for Identifying Toxics Contamination)
thousands of samples
Fixed
                            Fish Tissue
                 Biological             Special/Basin
                                                          WV
                                                          VA
                                                          PA
                                                          MD
                                                          DC
                                                          DE

-------
           Overall State Water Quality Monitoring Trends
o
S
          co
          OJ
          X
          • 1— I
          (X,
                                O
                                oa
                             GO
                             03
                            89
                            13
                            • i***
                             o
    Provides long-term
    trends of conventional
    pollutants
Provides data for
303d/TMDL and
watershed plans
Provides data for
303d/TMDL and
watershed plans
Provides data for
issuing fish consumption
advisories
      * Based on Personal Interviews.

-------
    TShe nesiilts of better monitomng are not always good news:

    Maryland's Recent Biological/Probabilistic Stream Results* Show:

®  Trout never found when upstream impervious land cover exceeds 2%.  (Sprawl, Habitat)

®  At 15% impervious cover, stream quality is never good. (Sprawl, Habitat)

    52% of all MD stream miles have poor quality physical habitat -- loss of riparian
    buffer from development activities.  (Sprawl, Habitat)

    Acid rain impacts nearly 20% of MD streams.  (Acidification)

    Based on the more sensitive fish and benthic data:

                    12% of all stream miles are in good condition.
                      Jo_ are fair or poor.
      REMAP Project with MD DNR, EPA Region III, MAIA and ORD.

-------
 Mid-Atlantic Highlands Assessment - Key Messages:
31 % of stream miles in poor condition for fish populations.    < Sprawl, Habitat)
Habitat destruction is the main stressor throughout the Highlands.   (Sprawl, Habitat)
Habitat loss is occurring in and along the streams removing the ecologically
critical riparian (streamside) habitat. (Sprawl, Habitat)
In PA and WV the main stressors identified are:
          Habitat Loss
         - Sedimentation
         - Acid Mine Drainage
          A  'j n                     ^  (Sprawl, Habitat, acidification, toxics)
          Acid Deposition             f
          Fish Tissue Contamination
          Non-Indigenous Species

-------
           Habitat Destruction  is a Major Stressor of Streams
            Superfund Sites
 •»
               *  j
             8  i

.;:       >€
          , * -.  L /r
Instream Habitat (physical habitat)
Riparian Habitat {vegetation along bank)
Mine Drainage
Acid Deposition
Tissue Contaminat on



Phosphorous
Nitrogen
i
Causes'
Point Sources
Nonpoint Sources
Atmospheric Deposition
Hazardous Waste
1 1 1 1
                                                                            14% Streams Require TMDLs
                                                                      Total Stream Miles -155,767

                                                                      303(d) Listed Stream Mies:
                                                                      DC-39
                                                                      Virginia • 1,882
                                                                      Delaware -2,542
                                                                      Maryland - 5,627
                                                                      West Virginia • 6,003
                                                                      Pennsylvania - 6393   /
                                           10      15     20     25

                                           Stream in Poor Condition
                                                             30
       Atmospheric Deposition
SCM Deposition (KgUa x 100)
^ <2000
  1 2000-2250
  B 2250-2500
^ 2500-2800
  • >2800
                                                              4,505 Stream Mites Affected
                                                              by Acid Mine Drainage
                                                   Total Stream Miles - 155,767
                                                     Maryland - 164
                                                     Pennsylvania - 3,158
                                                     Virginia - 18
                                                     West Virginia- 1,164

-------
              What are Invasive Species?
Thousands of foreign plant and
   animal species have become
   established beyond original
   range
    Crops
    Game animals
    Many are beneficial
Nonindigenous Species
    Species outside their historic
       range
    Intentional & unintentional
Invasive Species
    Population levels unchecked
    Threaten natives and ecosystems
Vertebrates
    Sea lamprey
    Walking catfish
    Alewife
    Common carp
    Lake trout
Invertebrates
    Formosan termite
    Fire ant
    Africanized honeybee
    Honeybee  mites
    European green crab
    Zebra mussel
    Asian clam

-------


-------
      Acid Deposition Continues to Affect the Region
    of Nitrogen and Sulfur

Estimated nitrate
deposition, 1999
                                        Estimated sulfate
                                        ion deposition, 1999
National Atmospheric Deposition Program/Mational Trends Network
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.ectu

-------
              Acid Deposition ana Acid Mine Drainage
              Remain Significant Problems in Region in
 A/ Acid-Impacted Streams
    (Mine Drainage and Acid Deposition)
Acid Deposition
    High
 .	.                          'Vfi
    iLow
                             r

-------
          OSM Estimates $3.8 billion »o Remedy Known AMD Sites

504 Sites
Unfunded Remediation
costs: $3.8 billion

c
Abandoned Mines (AMD) V
/\/ AMD Streams /
t^
County Boundaries J
r^ ^___
*
_^^
p*(^^
^?-3w*?#F
VA k. • / ff* /
t^j, S& *y.r T /a.
^£$L> J T %
f^^fSS^% ?
,,^v x/ 1,^
s 	 <*' \ v x/ -
^< — r-.' >/3 -,
V
> >'J ^
/ >^
y^ i -^
2Sk^ ? /*>
Ipfe

*

                                7

                              >^>


                   x
ft.

           r
             »K







                 •V
             r ^^j¥>









      '\

                   ^












Source: U.S. Office of Surface Mining Abandoned Mine Lands Inventory System (AMLIS)

-------
          Proposal: Targeting Air Inspection, to Reduce Acid Impacts
                    Acidification RAP - 2001 Proposed Focus Areas
      Top 50 NOx Emitters
 ••  HO*
A.,/ Ada Dep Scre-jrx j
 ,  Ho
  ft

SQUICO: AIRS
rj$^a^|gr
  fwr  *
A > Add
fxU
A..-
              . -
         RCRA T-S DB
                v, . S^ry7
              , -tt

            . "  -v>
              --.*,



                                r-r
       Top 50 SO2 Emitters
                                                                                    v^-
 •  SO2 TC(>
/••../ Ac Id Dcp Scr*j(«s

Acid Wlr»«-t«pjcw
-------
1

-------
Region III watersheds contain
   contaminated sediment
     Some are recommended for
        Superfund clean up

-------
    Sediment Contamination Widespread in the Estuaries
         PA
                            20 -
                                  Sediment Contamination
                                Chesapeake Bay
Coastal Bays
                                            Delaware Bay



                                       Good D Impacted H Severly Impacted
0 13 30

-------
 Pesticides and Metals Pervade the Sediments
               Tissue Residue Chemical Summary
      Dieldrin
Hexachloro benzene
                                   Lower Delaware LJ Upper Ohio
      Copper
                20,000
40,000  60,000   80,000
  Mean value (ppb)
100,000
120,000
    .*

-------
       Eight R3 Watersheds are Area of Probable Concern
                                       CHAUTAUQUA-CONNEAUT
                                   TV
Four Candidates for Super fund Investigation /s   ANGO I
              Very Good
 MIDDLE DELAW ARE-MUSCONE TCONG
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^•••^^^^^^^^^^^^•Ml
              Good
              Not strong
                          CONOCOCHEAGUE-OPEQUON
                                                        GUNPOWDER-PATAPSCOj
                         =^j SCHUYLKILLJ
                        OW ER DELAW AREJ
]
A
•.;vL&iJ.i.i3.-
Chautauqua-
'Gooneaut '-.-
.'Gunpowder-
FPatapsco
Lower Delaware
Conococheague-
\ Opequon
Middle Delaware-
Musconetcong
Schuylkill
Shenango
[Upper Ohio
I -jj.
•Marginal human healLh"ts;sues
•Some potential ecoiogieal-eonce«is4«/ PAHi.&jjietals
•No human health issues
•Significant ecological concerns w/ PAHs & metals
•Few human health issues
•Some ecological concerns w/ PAHs & PCBs
•No human health issues
^Possible ecological concerns
•Little humao health, issues
•Some ecological cuncerns w/ pe-slicides & mercury
•No human health issues
•Some ecological concerns w/ metals
•Marginal human health & ecological issues
•Marginal human health & ecological issues
*iiS.s*iul
•Marginal hujnan health effects
•Potential ecological effect at higher trophic levels
1
•Significant pesticides issues for human health
& ecological receptors
•Some human health concern w/ metal, pesticides & PCBs
•Some ecological issues w/pesticides & mercury
•Significant human health & ecological issues with pesticides
•Some marginal concern w/pesucides and PCBs
•Marginal human health and ecological concerns
•Marginal human health and ecological issues.
•Potentially significant human health and ecological concerns with
PCBs.
)Aii»S.?lUiUiailiii'.
\:Npt strong
Very Good
Good
Good
Not strong
Not strong
Not strong •"?
Good

-------
I

-------
           Agriculture-Related Polliuants/Stressors in Region III
                            PESTICIDES
                               691
                      LOW DO
                        2182
INORGANICS
    548
                     METALS
                      6786
         HABITAT
           4313
        NUTRIENTS
          5078
                             SILTATION/SOLIDS
                                   6160
                                PATHOGENS
                                    5352
                                        Miles Impacted
Other Ag-Reiated Pollutants Not Assessed:
* hormones
* antibiotics
* specific pathogens
  Note: Metals primarily from mining, stormwater and point sources.

  Highest reported miles by pollutant/stressor.
  Based on '96, '98, '00 305b Reports and '98 303d List.

-------
                 Nutrient Impaired Watersheds
    Watershed Boundry
TMDL Stream Miles (Nutrients):
    0-1
    1 -26
    26-147
    148-302
    303 - 462
    463-715

-------
               Potential AFO Target Areas
#
1
la
1b
2
2a
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
County
Augusta
Staunton
Waynesboro
Rockingham
Harrisonburg
Page
Franklin
Lancaster
Caroline
Dorchester
Somerset
Kent
Sussex
Wicomico
Worcester
State
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
PA
PA
MD
MD
MD
DE
DE
MD
MD
   Poultry Processing Facilities
# of AFOs
   120 -410
   60 - 120
   20 -60
   0-20
Phosphorous Loads
f   0
   • 0 - 0.24
   0.24-5.13
   5.13- 601.49













.





-------


-------
TMDLs: Implementation Issues and
Stream Restoration

-------
        jurces of Stream Impairment
TTVIDL Sources
Resource Extraction





      Unknown




  Natural Sources




    Point Source

        Oihet




   Superfund Site
                                                     W&.  J-
                                                  r  r  l   /  i^'
                                                 /   ^^^^
             0   1000  2000 3000  4000  5000


                       miles
   2604 Stream Listings


   19,721 Stream Miles Listed
                          *

-------
      Fop 3 Sources: Agriculture, Sto.mwater and Resource Extraction
             TMDL List doesn't reflect the assessments for Stormwater
                                                          Contaminated sediments not
                                                          identified as significant by
                                                          states
Data: 1996. 1998, 2000 305b Reports and TMDL List

-------
             Top 3 Stressors: Metals, ^olids and Pathogens.

             TMDL List doesn 't fully reflect the assessments.
        gaoo
         9920
          4960
                                                              ^*W%«s.
                                                               %,^   ^
Data: 1996, 1998,2000 305b Reports and TMDL List

-------

Gauging
 >rosress
                   »Fish Recovery

                   Benthic Recovery

                      Biological
            Improved stream chemistry/habitat

             • Chemical loading reductions
                   Physical/chemical
           • TMDL Design/Implementation
        319/104b3 Project Design/Implementation
                      Acti\it\
           TMDL Development and Approval
                      Activit\
Impaired Streams: Hierarchy of Progress Measures

-------
    Superfund and Water: i>iulti-Program Approach
AMD Streams
 Sensitive Populations

                 Targeting Criteria
          Abandoned Mines
         -
      ^•.    •:-:.*

     V"
           ST;
       •  -
  .^ < ^ ^--,--<. ,--f% a*4
  ••-'4 •.?<:- •   In
          Drinking Water Intakes
                1 •
               • • •»{-._»i*^--***
                   •~*-u


           %r f
                 - f
                  '
            ,... «"T^;^. ^ •»
            '4 - jir* -^ *' '* 'i"** •""'Si i
            .T_ ; • -:• »~':ir-*i.> >• • - -"^ .
                 Public Lands
Other Criteria:
 monitoring data
 "No Fish" streams
 TMDL Priority
                      / • m>
                  .  \
                       -: •
                     ;: •
                                                           Opportunity
                                                             rownfieldj
                   Environmentally
                   Sensitive Areas
                                                              '
ft-  e;'~
   ?;•••* •-.•"/• •"

         ,^;
       Currently 2 sites in PA are being assessed for CERCLA Removal
        	and Preliminary NPL e valuation

-------
Toxics,Problems < 1 mile from NPL Sites - Use Stipeiifiind $
•Toxks/M^tals Highlighted

•Source = Unknown
 NPL Points <
 from stream
                                                                Delaware R.

                                                               hristina R.

-------
          TMDL Implementation Challenges

• Multi-jurisdicational waters require coordinated multi-state,
   multi-region efforts.

•  Non-point source loads are difficult to quantify and control;
   Many are not regulated - abandoned mines and many AFOs.

   There are huge unfunded costs associated with acid mine
   drainage treatment, installation of nonpoint BMPs, and stream
   bank restoration.

   Sources of air toxics deposition often very difficult to identify.
                                o
   Contaminated sediments very expensive to remediate.

   Significant and costly  follow-up monitoring is required to
   track and verify stream improvements.

-------
          Region HI Water Quality
 Management Recommendations:

Increase the level biological/fish tissue monitoring.

Improve consistency between water quality assessments and
TMDL listings for sources and pollutants/stressors.

Retain the acidification priority.

Increase resources directed toward agriculture especially
AFOs and CAFOs.

Increase multi-program efforts toward TMDL implementation,

-------
E

-------
Urban Communities - Reducing the Risk

-------
                        Region Ill's Kids
                 Total Population in Region III
                       27,005,490
                              Children
                              6,477,980
                                24%
                                                      Urban Children
                                                       4,210
Source: US Census, 1998 estimate

-------
50
40
30
20
10
               The Percent of Children Living in Poverty
                        is Increasing in Region III
                W VA
     Between the periods of 1979 -1983 & 1992 -1996,
     the poverty rate of children in Region III increased
     from 22% to 26%
                                            US Rate = 25%
VA         MD        PA

  • 1979-1983 Q1992- 1996
DE     Regional Avg
    Source: National Center for Children in Poverty

-------
                 Majority of PBT Generated in Urban Areas
      Total PBT generated (tons)
           0.1 - 50
           51-500
           501-50000
           50001-500000
           >500000
- 8.7 million tons generated in Region
    PBTs
    - Aldrin/Dieldrin
    - Benzo(a)pyrene
    - Chlordane
    -DDT
    - Hexachlorobenzene
    - Alkyl-lead
    - Mercury
    - Mirex
    - Octachlorostyrene
    -PCBs
    - Dioxins/Furans
    • Toxaphene
  «••.
rt
                                              /
;
                                  P--_ S .-}--/r: ..•
                                   f&^-t
                                   ^. -~-~ _*-,- ^-^

-------
                  PBT Facilities Near Children  in Region Ml
     A  PBT Facilities

    Number of Children @ County
       <10000
       10000 - 20000
       20000 - 50000
       50000 - 90000
       90000 - 150000
       >150000
Prioritize PBT Facilities near Children
   - Inspections, enforcement, voluntary actions

-------
   Children & PBT Facilities Do Not Necessarily Go Together
Number of Children in Poverty

    H<40
     40-100
     100-200
    • 200 - 400
    .• >400


     PBT Facilities

-------
                                            Childrens1 Blood Lead Levels in
                                            Philadelphia is Decreasing
                                                                   % Children > 9ug/dl
                                                                   Blood Lead Level
                                                                        0- 10%
                                                                        10%-20%
                                                                        20% - 35%
                                                                        35% - 50%>
                                                                        > 50%
Presentations in 1999

-------

-------
Environmental Enforcement - Some Ideas

-------
        A Look Back.,. 10 Years of Enforcement
                                      1990-Present (August 2000)
                                                           Adrn. Orders
                                                       Adm. Complaints
                                 SDWA
                                                  Adm. CAFOs
                                              Civil Settlements
                                         Civil Referred
.-

-------
      Region 3 Enforcement Actions By Year And Act
                                               1990 - Present (August 2000)
         Administrative Orders
                                                    Administrative Complaints
                  1997
                    1998
                       1999
                         2000
                              RCRA
                                                                ,999   CAA
Administrative CAFOs Having Penalty Final Amounts
                                                Civil Judicial Referred Cases
1990
  1991
    1992
                                                                              RCRA
                                                                                 TSCA
                                                           2000
                                                                EPCRA5
                                                                   DWA
                                                                     TSCA
                                                                        RCRA
                                                                          CAA
                                                                             CWA
                                                                               CERCLA
                     2000

-------
                                                    -  1990- Present (August 2000)



                                          C^FOs w/Peth It" F^.ai Amounts
  *CLA -j^ $290.350
       $0
$5
CERCLA-U$1>096i2e5



  RFRA4L»e
                    Million



    Civi1 Judici- ! jeitlem-oiits
                                                            s  /P
ei»*'. ••
  RCRA-




   CAA-




  CWA-




 SDWA-




  TSCA-
                              $30
           $40
                                                 Million
                                                       	 $45.396,884






                                                       $43.280.084
                                                                                               $50

-------
   enforcement Targeting Opportunity: Linking Fish Advisorie
   for Toxics with PBT Facilities
/\/ Fish Advisories

Total PBT generated (tons)
    0.1 - 50
    51 - 500
    501 - 50,000
    50,001 -500,000
    > 500,000
             ,
            ^
I
                                                           •'

         • .

                                 ••   '

                                    .

-------
Lower Potomac aquifer, RCR
TSDs and major ground water
users

             UNION CAMP CORP
                    SIERRA RECYCLING INC
HERCULES INC FRANKLIN PLTJ \ X
            FRANKLIN CITY OF\

-------
1

-------
                           Cross Program Linkages

AFO/CFO
X
    X
   X
         X
                     X
                            X
                        X
NON IND SPECIES
       X
       X
      X
      X
                                 X
                                 X
WETLANDS
       X
       X
      X
      X
                                 X
                                 X
AMBIENT MONITOR
   X
    X
   X
   X
   X
   X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
WATER QUALITY
              X
             X
            X
            X
           X
                X
                        X
                         X
SPRAWL
X
X
X
X
X
X
  X
       X
       X
           X
            X
               X
TOXIC WARM SPT
             X
                X
               X
               X
SED. SOURCES
                   X
                   X
                  X
PBT
          X
          X
            X
               X
                X
                X
                           X
MtBE
                           X
                               X
                                          X
LEAD
                         X
                           X
AIR TOXICS
             X
                                   X
                                          X
GROUND WATER
X
       X
      X
      X
     X
         X
     X
                   X
                   X
                   X

-------
1

-------
We've Come a Long Way, but There's Still More Work to Do:
    Safe & Sustainable Environment for People & Ecosystems
    are Still Being Stressed

    Our traditional approach needs to emphasize cross-program
    & cross-agency innovative approaches

    They often fall outside traditional roles, regulations, &
    practices needed to solve our new chaileges
                     \
            eg., sprawl, cities/urban, estuaries,
               air & water toxics, monitoring

-------