EP A-R 2-73-196
 APRIL 1973              Environmental Protection Technology Series
   Steam Stripping
   Odorous Substances

   from Kraft Effluent Streams
                                 Office of Research and Monitoring

                                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

                                 Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into five series.  These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface  in  related
fields.  The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   1.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION   TECHNOLOGY   series.    This   series
describes   research   performed  to  develop  and
demonstrate   instrumentation,    equipment    and
methodology  to  repair  or  prevent environmental
degradation from point and  non-point  sources  of
pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology  required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality
standards.

-------
                                                 EPA-R2-73-196
                                                 April 1973
       STEAM STRIPPING ODOROUS SUBSTANCES FROM

               KRAFT EFFLUENT STREAMS
                          By

                  Bjorn F. Hrutfiord
                  Lennart N. Johanson
                  Joseph L. McCarthy

              University of Washington
              Seattle, Washington 98105
                   Project 12040  EXQ

                    Project Officer

                  Dr. H. Kirk Willard
 Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory
       National Environmental  Research Center
                Corvallis, Oregon 97330
                     Prepared  for

          OFFICE OF RESEARCH  AND MONITORING
        U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20460
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. £o»ernment J*rtatlng.0ffloe. Washington, D.C. 20402
               Price $1.25 dwnwtlc postpaid or »1 QPO Bookiiore

-------
                         EPA Review Notice

This report has been reviewed by the Water Quality Office,  EPA,  and
approved for publication.   Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                            ABSTRACT

Nature of Steam Volatile Components
The nature of the steam volatlle organic compounds which occur in kraft
pulp mill aqueous streams has been determined.  In order of decreasing
concentration, these are alcohols, terpenes, ketones, sulfur bearing
compounds and phenolic compounds.  Methanol is the main alcohol  and
was found in concentrations from 280 to 8400 ppm,  while ethanol
occurred at about 1/10 of these  levels.  Terpenes  were found in ranges
from a few ppm to about 4500 ppm.  Acetone is the  main ketone and
occurs from 2 to 210 ppm.  Sulfur compounds range  from 2 to 800 ppm,
based upon prior studies.  Combined-stream quantities of these components
in  Ib/ADTare 11.5 to 15.9 for methanol, 0.9 to 2.6 for ethanol, 3.8 to
9.2 for terpenes, 0.07 to 0.4 for acetone.
Process Design Studies
The feasibility of combining steam stripping of black liquor issuing
from a continuous Kamyr digester, with steam stripping of condensates
was explored.  Volatile compound release predictions were made for such
a process considering terpenes,  terpineols, methanol, and the sulfur
compounds, hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, methyl sulfide and
dimethyl  disulfide.   Black liquor stripping would  Increase overall
stripping costs about two-fold,  but would have the advantage of
simplifying turpentine recovery and further decreasing odor emanations
within the pulp mill and from discharged condensates, as compared with
a one to two-column condensate stripping process.   An exploratory study
has been made of predicting ternary and higher component systems of
volatile constituents with water, utilizing binary vapor-liquid and
solubiIity data.
Separation of 01 Is
The possibility of separation of the turpentine fraction of SEKOR oils
from the impurities, chiefly sulfur compounds such as methyl sulfide and

                               iii

-------
dimethyl disulfide and methanol was investigated.   For low concentration
of impurities, present methods of oxidative destruction would appear
preferable.  For higher concentrations fractional  distillation may be
promising  if only a-pinene is to be recovered.   Solvent extraction does
not appear to be promising:   selective adsorption, using silica gel
in preference to molecular sieves, may be feasible for higher
concentrations of impurities.
This report was submitted in fulfillment of project I2040EXQ under the
sponsorship of the Environmental  Protection Agency in cooperation with
the University of Washington, Seattle.
                              iv

-------
                            CONTENTS
Sect 1 on
I          Conclusions                                                '


I I         Recommendations                                            *


III       Introduction                                               5


IV        Objectives and Plans                                       7


V         Nature and Concentration of Steam Volatile Compounds       9


VI         Process Design Studies                                    3I


VII       Separation of SEKOR OiIs                                  65


VIII      Acknowledgements                                           '*

                                                                    -IK
IX        References                                                 IJ


X         Publications and Patents                                  79


XI        Glossary                                                   8I

-------
                             FIGURES
 I    FORMATION OF METHANOL, ETHANOL AND ACETONE IN LABORATORY       18




     KRAFT COOKS OF DOUGLAS FIR




 2    SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLE SITES FOR BATCH AND CONTINUOUS PROCESSES   20




 3    FLOW SYSTEM FOR COMBINED STEAM STRIPPING STUDY UTILIZING       34




     HEAT FROM BLACK LIQUOR STRIPPING




 4    FLASH CONCENTRATION AND OXIDATION STEPS IN BLACK LIQUOR        40




     RECOVERY




 5    MULTiEFFECT EVAPORATION STAGES AND DIRECT CONTACT EVAPORATION  42




 6    TERNARY LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM RESULTS AT 25°C. WATER PINENE       60




    METHANOL




 7   TERNARY LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM RESULTS AT IOO°C.   WATER PINENE     60




    METHANOL




 8   TERNARY LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM RESULTS AT IOO°C.   WATER            61




    DIMETHYL SULFIDE METHANOL




9   TERNARY LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM RESULTS AT IOO°C.   WATER-           61




    TERPINEOL-METHANOL
                               VI

-------
                             TABLES






No.                                                                Page






I      Organic Compounds In Kraft Mill  Condensate Streams           10



II    Estimated Composition of Kraft Mill  Streams                  13




III    Methanol Content of Some Condensate Streams from a           14



        Pacific Northwest Kraft Mi I I



IV    Total  Yields of Methanol, Ethanol  and Acetone from           16



        Laboratory Kraft Cooks




V     Concentration and Total  Turpentine in Kraft Mill  Conden-     22



        sate Streams




VI    Flow of Condensate Streams in the Kraft Pulp Mill  Process    23



VII    Material and Energy Balance for Kamyr Digester, Washers,     35



        and Flash System



VIM   Tower Height and Process Steam Requirements for Methyl        38



        Mercaptan Removal by Steam Stripping of Black Liquor



IX    Removal of Volatile Constituents by Steam Stripping of       38




        Kraft Black Liquor



X     Operating Parameters of Black Liquor Stripping Column        41




        for Cases Extended to Steam Stripping of Condensates



XI    Summary of Volatile Component Distribution - Case I          44




XII    Summary of Volatile Component Distribution - Case Ma        45



                               vii

-------
                         TABLES  (CONT'D)
 NO»                                                               Page
 ^"•^"™                                                              i—™»S*—
 XIII   Summary of  Volatile Component Distribution - Case  Mb       46
 XIV    Summary of  Volatile Component Distribution - Case  III       47
 XV     Case  I la -  Composition of  Feed and Product Streams of       48
         SEKOR A Columns
 XVI    Case  Ma -  SEKOR A Column  Design For Condensate Stripping   49
 XVII   Case  Ma -  Composition of  Feed and Product Streams, SEKOR   49
         Column C  Stripping Evaporator Condensate
 XVIII  Case  I la -  SEKOR Column C  Design For Evaporator Condensate  50
         Stripping
 XIX    Comparison of Contaminant Content of Condensate Without     50
         and With Steam Stripping
 XX     Water-Organic Binary System Results                         57
 XXI     Methanol-Organic Binary System Results                      58
 XXII   Summary of Margules Equation Constants For Binary Systems   59
XXIM  Summary of Renon Equation Constants For Binary Systems      59
XXIV   Summary of Break-through Data for Selective Adsorption of   71
         Dimethyl  Disulfide from Terpenes
                              viit

-------
                            SECTION I
                           CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of Steam VoI at Ile Compounds
I.  Methanol, ethanol, acetone and traces of other water soluble
organic compounds are quantitatively the most important steam strippable
organic compounds in condensate streams.
2.  Turpentine, characterized by a-pinene and especially a-terpineol  is
the second most important group of steam volatile organic compounds
found in condensate streams.
3.  Sulfur bearing compounds  do not occur in large concentrations, but
are important owing to their odor characteristics.
4.  Effective stripping of turpentine decanter underflow and of  blow
condensate would control  about three-fourths of the total  steam
volatile compounds in kraft mill  streams.
Design Studies
I.  Steam stripping of black  liquor under moderate pressure (under  100
psia) appears feasible on the basis of preliminary design study.
2.  Terpenes, methyl  mercaptan,  and methyl  sulfide can be largely
stripped out of black liquor in such a column.
3.  Overhead vapors generated are sufficient to serve as a heat  medium
for steam stripping of condensates through the first two multi-effect
evaporator stages.
4.  Methanol is stripped out  of black liquor and condensates with
difficulty, appearing in the  evaporation train through the first two
multi-effect stages,  and in the air effluent from weak liquor oxidation.
5.  Incorporation of black liquor stripping in a kraft system utilizing
condensate steam stripping would increase overall costs approximately
two to three-fold, relative to costs of steam stripping only condensates,

-------
OiI  Separations
I.  The separation of the turpentine fraction of SEKOR oils from the
sulfur compounds by solvent extraction does not appear promising.
2.  The separation of the turpentine fraction from sulfur compounds
utilizing selective adsorption was found to be technically feasible
on a laboratory scale.
3.  Silica gel will selectively retain sulfur compounds allowing their
removal  from terpenes in a packed column system.
4.  Synthetic zeolites of 10 to 13 angstrom pore size also selectively
adsorb sulfur compounds relative to terpenes, but less effectively than
si 1ica gel.

-------
                           SECTION II
                         RECOMMENDATIONS

All decanter underflow streams as well  as blow gas condensate  from
batch kraft pulping processes and analogous streams from continuous
processes should be steam-stripped for removal  and control  of  volatile
organic compounds.
Decisions on steam stripping of other condensate streams should  be
made on an individual  mill  basis.  For example, if methanol  is to be
reduced to levels below the equivalent of 2.0 Ib methanol/ADT  of pulp,
then two columns should be used, stripping the first two evaporator
stage condensates in addition to the higher concentration condensates.
Steam stripping will be superior to air stripping of condensates
for the majority of installations and should be used in all  except the
unusual cases,  in which the effluent air can be utilized in furance
combustion.
Steam stripping of black liquor would appear to be advantageous  only
for extreme situations of removal and recovery of volatile constituents.

-------
                           SECTION III
                          INTRODUCTION

Study of the steam stripping of Kraft Pulp Mill  effluent streams began
over a decade ago in the laboratories of the Chemical  Engineering
Department of the University of Washington.  These investigations were
conducted largely through the "Pulp Mills Research Program" of this
                                          *
University,  financed in part by the Northwest Pulp and Paper Association.
Results were reported to this sponsoring organization and in part have
since been published as three papers under the acronym SEKOR (Stripping
Effluents for Kraft Odor Reduction) as SEKOR I,  II, and III (TAPPI
Magazine, 50_ No. 2, pp 82-85, February 1967; 5£ No. 2, pp 86-91,
February 1967; and 5£ No. 6 pp 270-275, June 1967).  Part of the study
(reported in SEKOR II) was a cooperative venture with the St. Regis
Company at their Tacoma, Washington Kraft Mill,  in which the steam
stripping of condensates was successfully demonstrated in a bench-scale
continuous pilot plant.
Fellicetta,  Peniston and McCarthy first identified the major odorous
constituents  in such condensate streams (TAPPI 36_ 425, 1953) as hydrogen
sulfide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, and dimethyl disulfide.
This finding has since been verified in mills and  laboratories through-
out the world.  The SEKOR process provides a means of concentrating
these and other non-aqueous constituents, to allow disposal or further
processing and thus remove them from effluent waters.
While initial emphasis  in the steam stripping study was aimed at  removal
and control  of odorous compounds,  it has been apparent for some time
that significant amounts of other steam volatile compounds are present
in kraft pulp mill aqueous streams.  The SEKOR I  paper pointed out the
presence of significant amounts of turpentine in the originally

-------
 isolated oils, and analysis of aqueous condensate revealed the presence
of various alcohols and ketones of  low molecular weight.  These classes
of compounds are not of importance  from the viewpoint of odor, but
are very important in mill effluent due to the major BOD load caused
by the methanol etc., and the turpentine  is not particularly desirable
 in that certain compounds in this class may be toxic to marine
organisms.
With this general background, enough was  known to define what further
 information was needed for design of removal equipment.  Concerning
the compounds to be encountered, additional information on their nature
and properties was required as well as information on concentration
ranges in the several streams to allow decisions as to which streams
should be processed and what compounds to expect in the stripped
material.  Sizing of equipment could proceed from this information,
as well as the somewhat more difficult problem of defining operating
procedures.
Earlier reported work demonsrrated the feasibility of stripping
condensates,  and the present study extended these studies and included
as well an  analysis of application of steam stripping to black liquor,
since this  is the stream in  which all  volatile compounds are present.
Fractionation of the resulting stripped-out oils presented a special
problem,  and  basic investigations into separation methods were also
a part of this study.

-------
                          SECTION IV
                     OBJECTIVES AND PLANS

For the past three years, this work has been continuing at the
University of Washington under the sponsorship of the Research and
Monitoring Office of the EPA.  The goal of this program was to develop
sufficient fundamental  data and design information to allow the design
of SEKOR process modifications for a variety of industrial situations.
Inherent in the study was the improvement of process economics and
means of recovery of values such as hot reusable water and chemicals,
in order that the process may be made as attractive as possible for
adoption within the Kraft pulping industry.
The three specific aims of the research program were:
(a)  To secure further information concerning the nature and concent-
ration of steam-voI atile substances present in Kraft pulp mill black
liquors and condensates arising from a number of species of wood and
under several process conditions;
(b)  To conduct further laboratory experiments and SEKOR process
design studies in order to evaluate several alternative ways of
conducting the SEKOR process and to permit the optimum procedure or
procedures to be identified; and
(c)  To conduct laboratory and process design studies directed toward
the development and evaluation of procedures by which SEKOR oils,
arising under various conditions, can be separated on an industrial
scale into components or fractions which may be sold to return a
significant income to offset the costs of conducting the SEKOR process,
A further part of the objectives and plans for the study comprised
collaboration with representatives of the Weyerhaeuser Company.  A
joint plan of work-was developed and made known to representatives of

-------
Environmental Protection Agency.  Many discussions and conversations
occurred and yet at the time of conclusion of the present study,  it
had not yet been possible for representatives of the Weyerhaeuser
Company to proceed with development of the contemplated pilot plant
and thus, this phase of our original  plan could not be carried out.
Meanwhile, complementary attention was devoted to other phases of
the activity, and this is set forth below.
                              8

-------
                           SECTION V
      NATURE AND CONCENTRATION OF STEAM VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
               IN KRAFT PULP MILL PROCESS STREAMS

Introduction
The general  plan for this part of the study was to survey kraft pulp
mill  aqueous streams for steam volatile organic compounds and to
identify as  many of them as possible.  Following identification, the
concentration range in which the more important of these organics
occurred was determined, especially in the several condensate streams
i n the mill.
Samples were obtained from a wide variety of sources,  from a number of
Northwest pulp mills.  Basically these covered the main variables of
individual  streams in batch and continuous processes and also the
influence of wood species being pulped.  Effort was concentrated on
condensate streams such as digester relief condensate, blow gas
condensate and evaporator condensate in batch processes, and their
equivalent flash tank vapors and evaporator condensates in continuous
processes.   Some other more concentrated samples were also studied,
i.e.  crude sulfate turpentine and black  liquor from various mills.
Identification of Steam Volatile Compounds
A summary of the organic compounds identified in our studies is pre-
sented in Table  I.  Many of the compounds  listed have also been
identified by others.

-------
                            TABLE I
      Organic Compounds in Kraft Mill Condensate Streams
AIcohoIs
     Methanol
     Ethanol
     l-propanol
     2-propanol
     Butanol
     2-methyI-1-p ropanoI

Ketones
     Acetone
     2-butanone
     3-pentanone
     3-methyI-2-b utanone
     4-methyl-2-pentanone
     2-heptanone
Phenols
     Guaiacol
     Phenol
     Syringol
     o-Cresol
     m-Cresol
     p-Cresol
     AcetovaniI lone
Sulfur Bear!ng
     Methyl Mercaptan
     Dimethyl  Sulfide
     Dimethyl  disulfide
     Thiophene

Terpenes and Related Compounds
     a-pi nene
     Camphene
     6-pinene
     Mycrene
     A -carene
     a-phellandrene
     a-terpinene
     Limonene
     $-phellandrene
     3-terpinene
     Terpinolene
     Fenchone
     Linalool
     FenchyI  a IcohoI
     Terpi nene-4-ol
     a-terpineol
     2-methyIfuran
     Toluene
     4(p-toIyI)-1-pentano I
                              10

-------
The sulfur containing compounds were well  known and were verified  as
present in oils isolated from condensates  by steam stripping  in  our
earlier studies (I).  The presence of the  major alcohols,  methanol
and ethanol, were also verified in the earlier work and  additional
identification of trace components has been made by Bethge and
Ehrenborg (2).  The major ketone acetone has long been known  to  be
present in condensates, and the next most important ketone quantitat-
ively, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, had been identified earlier by infra-red
methods (I).  Ketones found in trace quantities and some additional
trace compounds are reported in the present study.  Of the phenolic
compounds, guiacol is the main compound found and was reported earlier
(4).  The remaining phenolics have been verified in our studies  here
and by others (4, 5).  The terpenes in condensate streams were
identified in our prior studies (I) and have been verified in detail
in more recent work (6).  Numerous other organic compounds are  present
in trace amounts.
These compounds have been isolated by steam distillation followed by
separation from water by solvent extraction or fractionation and
sometimes by selective chemical reactions.  In earlier work infra-red
spectroscopy was used for identification and this has been replaced
by use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in more recent studies.
Details are presented in the references listed (2, 3, 6).
The formation of these compounds will be discussed later.  At this
point it  is useful to recognize that most of these classes of compounds,
i.e., sulfur bearing compounds, alcohols, ketones, and phenols  are the
result of wood treatment and especially of reactions occurring  during
the pulping process and will be found in all kraft mills.  Only the
terpenes are characteristic of the wood species being pulped.  Thus
the main qualitative differences will occur in this class of compounds.
Quantitative differences are more a function of process operation and
equipment design and will also occur.
                               II

-------
 Concentration  Ranges  of  Steam Volatile Compounds
 Concentration  ranges  for sulfur bearing compounds  in  condensate
 streams  have been  well documented  in  the literature and were  not
 studied  (7).   These  ranges  are methyl  mercaptan (2-250 ppm),  dimethyl
 sulfide  (10-800) and  dimethyl  disulfide (2-140).
 The  concentration  of  methanol,  ethanol  and  acetone  in condensate
 streams  from the pulping  of  pine and  birch  has been reported  from
 various  mil Is  and  these  values  taken  from the  literature are
 summarized  in  Table  II.   In  order to  estimate the total methanol,
 etc.,  produced, the flow  rates  of the  individual condensate streams
 must be  known.  These were unavailable  and  therefore a calculation
 was  made based on  the estimated quantities  of 232, 2030 and 12,775
 Ibs  of water per air  dried ton  (ADT) of  pulp for the digester relief,
 blow,  and evaporator condensates respectively.  These represent
 typical  values from U.S.   kraft mills  (II).  The total  methanol yields
 resulting from the concentrations reported  in Table II are then about
 M to  16 Ibs methanol/ADT from  pine and  about II  Ibs methanol/ADT
 from birch.  Estimates of total ethanol  and acetone are also presented
 in Tab Ie II.
 Methanol  Content of Kraft Mill Condensate Streams
 Methanol  concentration was determined for condensate samples from a
 mill pulping several  wood mixes in order to provide further information
 on the effect of wood species and on the total  amount of methanol
 formed (12).  This study  was  limited to methanol  since its quantity is
 an order of magnitude greater than the next most abundant compound
 (ethanol) and since it makes the greatest single contribution to
BOD  (9).   The concentration of methanol, based on  the same material
balance  used for calculating the data in Table II,  are summarized  in
Table III.   The data show that the methanol  content of digester relief
                              12

-------
                            TABLE  I I

           Estimated  Composition of  Kraft Mill  Streams

                                     Wood  Species Pulped

        Condense Stream            ?£          B
Digester Rel ief
Methane 1 ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Ethanol ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Acetone ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Blow Gas
Methanol ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Ethano! ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Acetone ppm
( Ib/ADT)*
Evaporators
Methanol ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Ethanol ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Acetone ppm
(Ib/ADT)*
Total Condensates
Methanol Ib/ADT
Ethanol Ib/ADT
Acetone Ib/ADT

5900-7500
( 1.4-1.7)
700- 1 500
(0.2-0.4)
60-210
(0.02-0.05)

390-960
(0.8-1.9)
60-670
(0.1-1.4)
10-60
(0.02-0.1)

725-960
(9.3-12.3)
50-60
(0.6-0.8)
2-12
(0.03-0.2)

1 1.5-15.9
0.9-2.6
0.07-0.4

7100
(1 .6)
1600
(0.4)
120
(0.03)

525
(I.I)
25
(0.05)
5
(0.01)

625
(8.0)
15
(0.2)
5
(0.06)

10.7
0.7
0.10
*Conversfon from parts per million to pounds per air dried ton of  pulp
is based upon a nominal  material  balance giving 232 Ib/ADT relief
condensate, 2030 Ib/ADT blow condensate, and 12,775 Ib/ADT evaporator
condensate (II).
                                13

-------
                             TABLE I I I

        Methane I  Content  of  Some Condensate  Streams  from  a

                   Pacific Northwest  Kraft Mill
 Condensate
   Stream
Alder-Douglas fir   Cedar-Douglas fir    Douglas fir
     (=4:1)              (=4:1)             (\00%)
 Digester  Re! ief
 Condensate
   methanol  ppm
   Ib  MeOH/ADT

 Blow  Gas
 Condensate
   methanol  ppm
   Ib  MeOH/ADT

 Evaporator
 Condensate
   methanol  ppm
   Ib  MeOH/ADT

 Total Methanol
   Ib/ADT
 8400 ± 400 [2]*     2900 ± 100 [2]     2800 ± 400 [2]
 2.0**               0.7                0.7
 2000 ± 600 [3]
 4.1
 410  ±  20
 5.2
 11.3
1800 ± 100 [3]     2100 ± 300
3.7                4.3
410 ± 20 [2]
5.2
9.6
280 ± 20
3.6
8.6
*Methanol concentrations are reported in ppm (or mg/liter) together
with the approximate spread of data and the number of samples upon
which the result is based.

**Flow quantities were not available from the pulp mill.  The ppm
values were converted to a total  weight basis (Ibs/ton of air dried
pulp) by using a typical balance of 232, 2,030 and 12,775 Ibs of
water/ADT of pulp for digester relief condensate, blow gas condensate,
and evaporator condensate respectively (II).
                                14

-------
from alder cooks is similar to values from birch cited in Table II,
while prior values for pine are greater by a factor of two than values
reported here for Western red cedar and Douglas fir.
Blow gas condensate concentrations and amounts in Table Ml  are
uniformly higher than previously reported values of Table II,  while
evaporator condensate values are lower.  This probably reflects a
difference in the process conditions relative to blow condensate.
Differences in extent of water recycle and direct contact evaporators,
for instance, are not taken into account in Tables II and III, and
these would obviously effect concentration.  The total methanol
content of all condensates are of comparable magnitude in Table II
and III, of about 8 to 12 Ib/ADT.
The alcohols are quantitatively very important among the organic com-
pounds in mill condensates.  Methanol is the main alcohol found and  is
also the main organic compound, often reported in concentrations as
high as 0.5%  in digester relief condensates.  It is extremely important
in overall mill effluent BOD.
Effect of Wood Species on Methanol Formation
The effect of pulpwood species on the amount of methanol formed in
kraft pulping was studied in more detail by carrying out laboratory
cooks.  Mill samples are unsuitable for this purpose  for several
reasons, among which are the unavailability of condensates from
pulping of a single wood species, different cooking cycles with
different pulpwood mixes and difficulties  in determining adequate
material balances on condensates.  The results from the  laboratory
cooks on the  four woods are summarized in Table  IV which also  includes
results for ethanol and acetone.  There are significant  differences
in the total  amount of methanol  formed, ranging  from  about 28  Ibs/ADT
from the hardwood Red alder to about  14  Ibs/ADT  for  Douglas fir.  The
trend  in the  quantity of methanol formed  is similar  to the total
                                15

-------
methoxyl content of the wood, which is reasonable since most of the
methanol is formed with 4-0-methyl glucuronic acid residues, typically
greater in hardwoods.

                           TABLE  IV
             Total Yields of Methanol, Ethanol and
              Acetone from Laboratory Kraft Cooks
Wood Species
Red Alder
Western red cedar
Western hemlock
Douglas fir
Methoxy 1
Content, %
( + )
5.58
5.0
4.42
Methanol
27.8*
26.2
15.6
14.4
Ethanol
1.7*
1.4
1.7
2.3
Acetone
0.3*
0.4
0.3
0.4
*  All values are in Ibs/ADT of pulp
+  Not available but considered higher than softwood methoxyl  content

Ethanol does not show a trend which can be related to wood species,
which  is expected since it is formed primarily by fermentation in the
wood after felling,  and is thus dependent on chip pretreatment (13).
Generally, the ethanol  forms rapidly under anaerobic conditions,
reaching a maximum In a week or so.  The reaction is slower under
aerobic conditions.   Ethanol  is lost fairly rapidly on storage.
Acetone, the origin of which is not well defined, also shows no trend
with wood species.  The ethanol and acetone by-products are present
in much smaller quantities than methanol.
Comparison of Methanol, Ethanol and Acetone Yields with Commercial
Results
The trends in the total amount of methanol formed from different wood
species in mill  pulping agrees with that found in laboratory cooks.
The order of magnitude of the differences is, however, not as great as
                               16

-------
expected based upon the laboratory cooks.   This may be explained in
part by the fact that the mill  samples result from pulping of mixtures.
The estimated wood ratio used for the particular samples,  shown in
Table Ml, will  tend to decrease the magnitude of the species
differences.  A more important factor is likely to be the  difference
in pulping conditions used for softwoods versus hardwoods.
The reaction forming methanol is
                   R-OCH3 + NaOH •*• R-ONa + CH3OH                  Eq.l
and probably is a second order 3.2 type of reaction.  The  rate
expression for forming methanol  would then be
                   Rate = k [R-OCH ] [OH~3                        Eq.2
The rate constant has not been determined.  However a brief study of
the rate of formation of methanol, ethanol and acetone was made by
pulping Douglas fir and determining the cumulative content of these
compounds at several time intervals during the cooking cycle.  The
results are shown  in Figure  I.  The curve for methanol formation from
wood is similar to the results from hemicellulose  reported by
Clayton (14).  Methanol formation is still occurring at the end of a
normal cooking time and shorter cooking cycles will result in  less
methanol being formed.  Lower temperatures and  lower pulping pH also
have the same effect.  In commercial pulping of hardwoods all of
these cooking parameters are reduced, resulting  in  less methanol
being formed despite the higher potential with hardwoods.   The
ethanol concentration  remains constant after about one hour of
reaction time in agreement with a fermentation route of formation prior
to the cook as the main source of this compound.   Acetone, present  in
low concentration,  is  actually declining  in concentration after the
first hour of reaction time,  indicating  loss,  in  all  probability, by a
condensation  reaction.
                                17

-------
      20
      15
    3
   O-
   o   10
   <
   v^
   (fl
         0
                                                    metHanoi
                                                ethanol
                                                 acetone
30          60          90
       Time in Minutes
                                                         120
FIGURE  1.   Formation of Methanol,  Ethanol  and Acetone in Laboratory
                               Kraft  Cooks.
           17°C, 20* active  alkali, 25%  sulfidity, 6/1  1iquor/wood
                                18

-------
The difference in absolute magnitude between the methanol  quantities
found in laboratory cooks and in mill  streams may be due  to several
factors, the most important of which is the significant difference  in
pulping conditions.  More complete recovery of volatiles  possible
from the laboratory black liquor and departures of industrial  process-
ing from the assumed material balance may also be important.   The
large differences involved do suggest estimates of the methanol  content
of kraft process streams are perhaps generally conservative.
Turpentine Concentration
Condensate water is often contaminated with turpentine.  Usually
crude sulfate turpentine is collected from digester relief gas by
condensation and turpentine separation in a decanter.  The decanter
underflow contains the greatest concentration of turpentine of any
stream in the process.  There are many other turpentine containing
streams in a mi I I and large variations in concentration can occur  in
these streams, dependent on design and especially on operation
variables.
A survey of turpentine concentrations was undertaken in which a variety
of water samples were collected from four mills in the Pacific North-
west and British Columbia.  Usually a number of samples were collected
from the same source over a month's operating time so that what might
be called normal operating ranges could be established.  Actual
sampling sites are shown in Figure 2, which is a composite schematic
of the essential features of the mills sampled.  Both batch and
continuous systems were included in the study with the continuous
operation systems -including  latest technology high turpentine yielding
systems (16,  17).
Sample sites  I, 2 and 3 in Figure 2 are for batch processes and
represent digester relief, blow and evaporator condensate; sample  were
actually taken from the turpentine decanter underflow, the heat
recovery accumulator, and evaporator condensate respectively.

                                19

-------
NJ
O
               Condenser
              Decanter
                 Condenser
                  15)  Sewer
                     Decanter
                (4)  Underflow

>\





Batch
digester














*o
Blow tank
Eva|
                                                                     Hot water accumulator
                                                                    Underflow
                               Y
                       Washers
                                        Kamyr
                                                                                —*to  furnace

                                                                               'Condensate
] Steaming vessel
  Flash
   tank
    1
          Rash
          tank
            2
 Waste  heat
 recovery

 Flash tank
i
 Condensate
                                             Blow tank
                                                                            -»   —
             Evaporator  Concentration
             condensate   condensate
                  C?)         (§)
                                                                                             Condenser
                       Hot well
                       decanter
                                      Hot well decanter
                                         Underflow
               Figure  2.   Sample  sites   for batch and continuous  processes

-------
Sample sites 4 and 5 include condensate originating from the #1  flash
tank of a Kamyr system via the steaming vessel.   Sample #4 is from a
turpentine decanter underflow and #5 is condensate from a system
where heat recovery is practiced but no turpentine is recovered.
Samples 6, 7, 8 and 9 originated from the further processing of  black
liquor.  Samples 6 and 7 were from early stages  in the evaporators;
8 was from the final stages of evaporation and 9 was a decanter
underflow sample.  Many interconnections exist in the system and
changes in operating variables may be expected to greatly influence
the concentration of turpentine in the several streams.
The results of this survey are summarized in Table V which lists con-
centrations of turpentine found in the various streams and also  the
total  turpentine represented by this stream in Ibs/ADT of pulp
produced.  The latter figure is calculated from the concentration
and from the flow rate of the stream.  We were able to obtain estimates
from mill personnel of flow rates for each of the streams sampled
and these along with the NCASI survey averages (II) are  listed  in
Table VI.  Further details of survey techniques used may be found in
reference (15).
Batch Systems
The turpentine concentration has been determined in a number of  indi-
vidual samples of decanter underflow water obtained from four different
mills.  Each mill was fairly consistent, but very  large differences
were found between mills.  The highest concentration observed was
about 5400 ppm and all samples from this mill averaged 4500 ppm.
A second mill averaged about 1500 ppm and two other mills averaged
about 435 ppm.  These mills all pulp similar wood mixes  including
Western Hemlock, Douglas Fir, and some Ponderosa pine plus some other
species.  Most pine is pulped at Mill A, (-25%) which has the highest
underflow concentration.  The ten-fold difference  found  between these
mills cannot be explained based only on species differences and must

-------
                                         TABLE V
          Concentration and Total Turpentine in Kraft Mill Condensate Streams

Sample                                                       Mill Designation
 No.*       Process Stream                A                  BCD

   I     Batch Decanter Underflow   4514 ± 950 (4)**   1490 ± 300 (4)   430 ± 90 (4)    444 ± 5  (2)
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)       (2.02)             (.37)
  2     Hot Water Accumulator          665 (I)            208 (I)          	  -
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)       (2.98)             (.63)
  3     Evaporator Condensate          106 (I)             23              	            	
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)       (.50)               (.31)

  4     Steaming Vessel Decanter    580 ± 155 (3)
        Underflow                      (.23)
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)
  5     Sewered Steaming Vessel        	                1493 (I)         	            	
        Condensate                                        (1.39)
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)

  6     #2 Flash Tank Condensate       105 (I)
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)       (.33)
  7     Evaporation Condensate         146 (I)            	             	            	
        (Kamyr)                        (2.49)
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)
   8     Concentration Condensate       307 (I)            	             	            	
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)       (.61)

  9     HotwelI Decanter Under-     616 ± 350 (3)
        flow                           (.04)
        Turpentine, ppm (Ib/ADT)
*Sample sites shown in Figure 2
**Spread of data and number of samples analyzed

-------
                            TABLE VI

             Flow of Condensate Streams in the Kraft

             Pulp Mill  Process, (Results in Ib/ADT)*
Sample                                   MI I I  Designation
 No.                                A         B      C      D     NCASI

  I      Batch Decanter             448        253   230    230      232
        Underflow

  2     Hot Water                  4,482    3,023   	    	    2,030
        Accumulator

  3     Evaporator                14,061    13,300   	    —   12,775
        Condensate

  4     Steaming Vessel               398     	   	    —     	
        Decanter Underflow

  5     Sewered  Steaming Vessel      	      930   	    	     	
        Condensate

  6     #2 Flash Tank              3,186     	   	    	     	
        Condensate

  7     Evaporator Con-            17,074     	   —    	     	
        densate  (Kamyr)

  8     Concentrator               1,991      	   —    	     	
        Condensate

  9     Hotwell  Decanter              64     	   	    	     	
        Underflow
'Flow data are based on average values from the mills involved
                                23

-------
 be  due to  differences  In  equipment  and operating practice.  We were
 able to obtain straight  line correlations between sodium concentration
 and turpentine concentration on batch decanter underflow, supporting
 the idea of turpentine being emulsified by black liquor carryover.
 Losses of  turpentine via  the underflow can be significant; e.g. mill
 A may  lose up to 2  Ibs/ADT  in this  stream.
 As  expected, the concentrations of  turpentine found in blow condensate
 are lower  than those found  in decanter underflow.  Values of 665 and
 208 ppm were found  in two mills in  the accumulater water.  The amount
 of  turpentine found here will vary  due to differences in digester
 steaming practices and equipment design.  For example, one mill
 studied uses a vaporshere for control of noncondensables from the blow,
 and condensate from this system is  returned to the digester relief
 turpentine decanter instead of to the hot water accumulater.  On the
 other hand, another mill  was operating at reduced production rates
 and was doing less relief gas venting, thus increasing the amount of
 turpentine in the accumulator water.  Samples of evaporator condensate
 generally contain very little turpentine; 106 and 23 ppm were found in
 two samples.
 The total  turpentine found in mills A and B in these three condensate
 streams has been calculated, Table V, and is 5.5 Ibs/ADT in mill  A
 and 1.31  Ibs/ADT in mill  B.   It is  important to recognize that these
 values depend on accurate flow  measurement which is difficult in an
operating  mill.   Referring to Table VI,  the flow values  reported for
the various streams In mill  A are generally much higher  than the
average values found in surveys done by  the NCASI  (II)-.   Mi 11  A and
also mi 11  B tend to have  high rates of condensate flow,  and this may be
 characteristic of   Western  mills  as opposed to Southeastern mills.
 It  is  apparent that the blow condensate  is the  more important stream
 in total turpentine quantity despite the lower concentration.   If both
 decanter underflow and blow  condensate were effectively  steam stripped,

                               24

-------
75 to 90% of the turpentine lost could be recovered.  Recovery of this
turpentine by air stripping is not feasible.
Continuous Processes
Decanter underflow, originating from the #1  flash tank and steaming
vessel condensate, was found in one mill  to contain 580 ppm turpentine.
In a second mill, heat Is recovered from this stream but a turpentine
decanter is not used and the condensate was found to contain 1493 ppm
turpentine.  In terms of total turpentine, the decanter underflow
represents a negligible 0.23 Ibs/ADT, while the unseparated condensate
represents  1.39 Ibs/ADT of turpentine.
In the continuous process, only a part of the available turpentine is
removed from the black liquor via the steaming vessel and recovery of
the remainder requires processing of a number of streams including
washer vents (17).  Whatever turpentine is available from these vents
and from the blow tank is returned to the steaming vessel decanter
in the mill studied.  Remaining turpentine in the black  liquor is
routed to a separate decanter, condensate here originates from the
#2 flash tank,  several points in the evaporators and other sources.
This decanter underflow contained 616 ppm turpentine, and this value
combined with the low flow rate shows very low toss of turpentine via
this route.
Samples of condensates from the first evaporator stages were analyzed
and these show relatively low turpentine concentrations  in the 100 to
150 ppm range.   The flow rates are high here, especially on Sample 7
and an appreciable amount of turpentine is lost in this condensate.
Concentrator condensate, Sample 8, analyzed 307 ppm, and another
high flow rate is reported for this stream.  Altogether, the evaporator
condensates contain about 2.4 Ib/ADT of turpentine, and thus are about
as important in turpentine losses as batch blow condensate and decanter
underflow.  Comparisons of this kind are not as meaningful as would be
                               25

-------
desired because of the extensive recycle and reuse of condensate water,
which are factors not considered in detail  in this study.
Origin L_pf Steam Volatile Organic Compounds  in Kraft MF I i  Streams
Understanding of the origin of the organic  compounds of  interest may
lead to ways of controlling their formation and release.   Of the main
classes identified (Table I) methyl mercaptan and its derivatives are
the most objectionable.  The chemistry of their formation  and physical
phenomena related to their release has been extensively  studied and
is reviewed elsewhere (7).  Briefly, methyl mercaptan is  formed by a
reaction between lignin methoxyl  groups and hydrosulfide  Ion (Eq. 3),
dimethyl sulfide is formed by a similar reaction (Eq. 4)  and the
disulfide is an oxidation product (Eq. 5).
       Lig-O-Me + SH~ - > Lig 0* + MeSH                     Eq. 3
       Llg-O-Me + MeS~ - > Lig 0* + MeSME                    Eq. 4
       2MeS" + [02]  - > MeSSMe                            Eq. 5
Methanol is believed to arise via alkaline  hydrolysis of  4-0-methyl
glucuronic acid residues in hemicel lulose (Eq.  6), as discussed earlier.
                      OH'   - >            +  Me OH
It has now been established that ethanol  is present in wood chips prior
to pulping (13).  Apparently anaerobic conditions develop in the log
as water transport Is disrupted and some ethanol  is formed via
glycolysis as this condition develops.  Usually the ethanol  can be
detected a week or two after fel ling of the tree (18).  Some ethanol
will  be lost by volati I izat ion from the chip and the remainder wi I I
then be steam distilled off during pulping.  Several  higher alcohols
have been found in trace amounts (2), these alcohols are for the most
part normal components of fusel oil.  This kind of alcohol is derived
from ami no acids,  or their precursors, by a process of deam! nation,
decarboxy I at ion and reduction, Eq. 7 a, b, c.
                               26

-------
             0                             0
R-CHCO.H  +   RC-CCLH  ,,  transaminase  ^  R-c-m H  +  R-CH-CCLH
  ,    £          z   V                        ^         t    ^
                                                               Eq. 7a
  0
R-C-COM   decarb0xYlaSe> RCHQ  +
      Z                              Z                         tq. /b
RCHO  +  NADH   +  H
                         alcohol
                  ,+   dehydrogenase ^  DPU .u  .   ,.,n+           Eq. 7c
                                     "Fusel  oil"
                                     Component
All of the ketones  reported from kraft mill  streams are  methyl ketones,
CH^CO-R,  which  are  formed by air oxidation of extractives,  followed by
decomposition of  the extractive hydroperoxide to an a, 6-unsaturated
ketone, which  in  turn may undergo .a reversed aldol  reaction under the
kraft pulping conditions, Eq. 8.
         p     a'r  ^ Extractive      decomposition ^    „
            oxidatiolT Hydroperoxide                w R-C-CH=CH-R
                                                               Eq. 8
  0                      0
  11      *   re\/pr«;fiH     "
R-C-ONCHR      .7;  >  R-C-CH,   +   other products
               aldol          3
For the phenolic compounds, guaiacol is the main compound reported  in
condensate streams.  Others indicated as present are phenol,  syringol,
cresols, vanillin and  acetonvani I lone.  Guaiacol and syringol  are
more readily volatile  with steam  and usually are found in evaporator
condensates.  They are probably formed from structural elements  in
lignin having free phenolic and a-hydroxyl groups via a reversed
Lederer-Manasse reaction, Eq. 9.
   H-4-
                           x^
     OH  H-C-OH   H"9,>H

Tli   OMe     if   OMe     ^5i   OMe      lOMe
10            0           iO            OH           Eq. 9
                               27

-------
Guaiacol and related phenolIcs such as the cresols have not received
the attention they deserve in control of odor as well as toxicity.
Most people recognize that the overall odor of a kraft mill is
"different" from that of the well known sulfur bearing compounds, and
one can usually distinguish a "burned or typical" odor near the mill.
This is probably due to phenols in the evaporator condensate (5).
Guaiacol is the main phenolic component present in this stream,
and using the data of Marvel I  and Wiman (4) a concentration of about
10 ppm may be estimated for evaporator condensate from the pulping of
Douglas fir.  Since the odor threshold for guaiacol dissolved in
water is reported to be 0.021  ppm (19), guaiacol should be readily
detectable.  Paracresol, probably present in much lower concentration,
since it is barely detectable, has an odor threshold value of 0.001 ppm
in air and probably is also important (20).  These compounds are
described as having burned, smoky, phenolic, tar-like or pungent odors.
Chlorination of condensate streams is often used as a means of odor
control.  This is usually done by mixing bleach plant effluent with
the condensate stream,  This  treatment may in fact give rise to
chlorinated compounds by reaction with guaiacoi (21).  It has recently
been reported that tetrachloro-o-benzoquinone and related chloro-
catechols,  which may be derived from guaiacol, are the principal
toxic components in bleached  kraft chIorination effluent (22).
Control  of  the release of these phenolic compounds may be achieved by
using high  alkalinity in the  weak black liquor.  All  of these phenolics
have a  pK  of 10.0-10.5 so that their vapor pressure will  be a function
         a
of the  pH of the system, very  similar to the situation reported for
methyl  mercaptan (23).  Higher alkalinity  will reduce the amount of
phenols  in  the condensate streams.  Conversely, steam stripping of
condensates at lower pH values will  aid in transferring the phenols
to the  distiI late.
                               28

-------
Several  terpenes are listed  in  Table  I.   These compounds as a class
are usually not considered in effluent  problems since they are for
the most part collected and  marketed.   However, they do appear in
condensate streams,  especially  the digester relief condensate.  This
is due mainly to incomplete  phase separation in the turpentine
decantors which are never 100/K  effective.   In general, the terpenes
found in the condensate are  similar to  those present in the wood
before pulping.  However, comparisons of  turpentine from Douglas fir
wood with sulfate turpentine indicates  the  amount of a- and 6-pinene
decreases, while limonene as well  as  several terpene alcohols  increase
during the pulping process.   The changes  are summarized  in equation  10.
                A,
                1$)
ct-pinene
6-pinene   limonene    a-terpineol   Fenchyl
                                    alcohol
                                                               borneol
                                                                Eq.  10
Other degraded terpenes i.e. methyl  furan and 4-(p-toly I )pentanol-l
are formed by more involved reaction pathways.
                               29

-------
                          SECTION VI
                    PROCESS DESIGN STUDIES

General  Considerations
Prior studies have been reported from these laboratories  (24,  25)
                                                   t
utilizing steam stripping to reduce terpene and sulfur compound  loads
in kraft mil I condensate streams.  These studies showed that by  steam
stripping, reusable hot water can be obtained,  or the odor levels  and
oxygen demand can be greatly reduced in water to be discharged from
kraft recovery systems.
There remain associated with these operations,  however, several
disadvantages which it would be desirable to minimize.  These include
(I) the recycling of terpene and sulfur compounds back through the
digester to increase concentrations if "sour" condensates are utilized
for the steaming of chips as in the Kamyr system; (2) the gradual  loss
or escape at numerous points in the recovery system, of terpenes and
odorous sulfur constituents, as black  liquor is concentrated; (3)  if
air oxidation of weak black  liquor is utilized to minimize the above
losses, the air effluent from the oxidation system is  itself a source
of odorous gases.
It is becoming increasingly  clear that  reduction of water contamination
by transferring the burden to air effluent streams is not a satisfactory
solution of such problems.   Therefore,  a modification of the steam
stripping process was sought to minimize the problems enumerated above.
The concept  discussed  in the following  pages involves the steam
stripping of black  liquor  effluent from a continuous  digester while it
is still  under pressure,  in  a multi-stage stripping  column.  The
resulting overhead  steam  from the column, at about 77 psia, has
sufficient heating  value to  be  reused  as a stripping agent  or indirect
heat  source  for steam  stripping  of various mill  condensates.   It would

-------
contain appreciable quantities of odorous constituents and terpenes,
however; and  its  utilization  in this manner requires careful
consideration.
Since the completion of these prior steam stripping studies, our
knowledge of  the  volatile constituents of kraft black liquor has
improved considerably, as already reported, and the vapor-liquid
equilibrium distribution of some of these has also been clarified (23,
26),  allowing for a more complete and more sound evaluation of the
overall process.   In addition, a study has been completed of the
expected release  of volatile terpenes, terpineols, and sulfur
compounds from kraft recovery systems (27).  These results, together
with  literature sources which have become available since initiating
this work, were utilized in the following report of design studies
of combined steam stripping of kraft mill recovery system streams.
The  long term objective of the study is to find the optimum combination
of steam stripping column or columns so as to minimize combined capital
and operating costs, taking advantage of marketable by-products to
decrease the overall costs of controlling effluent water contamination
and air pollution.
Steam Stripping of Black Liquor
The steam stripping of black liquor as it leaves the digester would be
expected to reduce immediately the concentration of the most volatile
constituents,  the terpenes, terpineols, methyl sulfide,  and, if the pH
of the black  liquor is 12.0 or below, of methyl mercaptan.  These
volatiles would,  therefore, not be appreciably present through the one
or more flash stages,  dilute liquor oxidation and multi-effect
evaporation.   Odors from leakage, etc., during these operations would
be decreased,  and the resulting condensates would contain fewer
volatile constituents,  and lower biochemical  oxygen demand.  In addition,
the terpenes should be more amenable to recovery for sale, if this
is desired, by isolating the condensate of black liquor stripping from
other condensates and controlling the amount of steam used for this
                               32

-------
purpose.  The study of actual  terpene content of various  streams  of
existing kraft mills.  Section  V of this report,  illustrates  that  in
the absence of black liquor stripping,  turpentine appears in the  second
flash stage in continuous digester systems and to some extent,  in
evaporator condensates as well.
Since methanol was not considered in the prior design studies,  an
important purpose of the present calculations is to estimate its
distribution during black liquor evaporation.
Continuous Kamyr System Stripping Processes
The nature and quantity of terpenes and terpineols present in kraft
black liquor  is dependent mainly upon the wood species and condition.
Methanol, methyl mercaptan and methyl sulfide yield are governed  by  the
methoxyl content of wood lignin and process kinetics.  The assumptions
and procedures of Tsuchiya and Johanson (27) were adopted for this
study.  These were modified as necessary to incorporate the possibility
for steam stripping of black liquor ("SEKOR stripping column B"), of
high-odor condensates ("SEKOR stripping column A"), and of low-odor
condensates ("SEKOR stripping column C").  A flow sheet illustrating
these possibilities is shown as Figure 3, which incorporates heat
recovery and disposal  features.
Published material and energy balance information (28) for a continuous
Kamyr digester, washers, and flash system producing 550 ADT/D of  pulp
was combined with additional information on concentrating black  liquor
by evaporation  (29,30) to give a general basis for calculation of
the removal of steam volatile substances from black  liquor by steam
stripping.  Pertinent data are shown in Table VII.
                               33

-------
       Steaming Vessel
Column "B" Overhead Condensate
Black
                 To Flash Tank
FIGURE 3.  Flow System For Combined Steam Stripping Study Utilizing Heat From Black Liquor Stripping.

-------
                           TABLE VII
        Material and Energy Balance for Kamyr Digester,
                   Washers and Flash System

        Digester Capacity                550 ADT/D
        Black  Liquor Flow Rate           481,000  Ib/hr
        Dissolved  Solids                 73,200  Ib/hr
        Per  Cent Solids                  15.256
        B. L.  Temperature                3I5°F

The major influence of  wood  species is  in the  nature and amount of
terpenes and  in the methanol  content.   Terpene recovery is  estimated
arbitrarily for a Western  U.S.  conifer  yielding an assumed  average  of
1.0 gal  terpene per air dried ton of pulp  (31).
The methanol  yield Is based  on an average yield of 2.38 gal/ADT or
15.6 Ib/ADT as found for Douglas  Fir (12),  a low methanol-yield!ng
species, and  has been superimposed on the original digester effluent
stream material balance for this  calculation.
Prediction of Stripping Column Performance  in  Continuous Kraft Mill
Recovery Systems
Removal  of 905? and 99% of methyl  mercaptan  from the black liquor
digester effluent by steam stripping were chosen for design bases.
Methyl mercaptan has an offensive odor which makes its removal from
black liquor highly desirable.  Upon oxidation, any methyl  mercaptan
remaining will be converted to dimethyl dtsulfide which also has an
objectionable odor.  At a given alkaline pH, the vapor pressure of
methyl mercaptan is much higher than that of hydrogen sulfide.
However, the hydrosulfide ion concentration in black liquor is so high
that  larger absolute amounts of hydrogen sulfide will ordinarily be
released.
                                35

-------
 After selection  of methyl  mercaptan  removed as the  design basis, the
 next  variable  to be  considered was the  feed to steam  ratio, or  liquid
 to gas ratio  CL/G).   The minimum  steam  rate corresponds to equilibrium
 conditions  at  the rich  end of the stripping column  (32).  Equilibrium
 data  from work done  previously at the University of Washington  (23, 26)
 were  used for  hydrogen  sulfide and methyl mercaptan.  Two pH  levels,
 II  and 12,  were  considered as being  representative  for black  liquor
 from  a continuous digester.
 The stripping  towers  designated as Columns A, B and C in Figure 3, are
 two-phase continuous  contacting   devices  in which volatile components
 within the  liquid feed  are transferred to a counter-current gas phase
 which,  in this case,  is steam.  For  dilute solutions with no chemical
 reaction occurring, the number of transfer units required for
 separation  is  proportional to the logarithmic mean driving force.  The
 black liquor stripping tower "B"  has been placed after the digester
 and before  the first  flash tank in the process flow sheet.  This
 allows  steam stripping  under pressure to be utilized, which makes
 the column  overhead stream valuable  as a heat medium for columns "A"
 and "C".
 Column  height  requirements were determined for a range of feed-to-steam
 ratios  of practical  interest 20 < (L/G) < 55.  At the lower end of
 this  range,  steam costs are high and column height requirements are
 minimized.  At the upper end of the  range, steam costs are reduced,
 but column  height requirements increase.  Column height is evaluated
 in  terms of  the theoretical "number of transfer units" (Ntu)  (33).
 For many common  industrial  column designs, a transfer unit corresponds
 to  about two actual  plates in a plate-type tower,  or to about 3 to 6
 feet of packing  in a packed-type tower.
 Results summarized in Table VIII  show that the removal of methyl
mercaptan is directly dependent upon  the pH of the black liquor, and
                               36

-------
the column height or the number of transfer units within the stripping
column, and the feed to steam or L/G ratio.  Dissociation of both
methyl mercaptan and hydrogen sulfide increases with increasing pH,
rendering them less volatile.  For example, for feed steam ratio of
30:1, 90% removal of methyl  mercaptan at pH 12 or 99% removal  of
methyl mercaptan at pH II  each require 5.3 transfer unfts.  Or for the
same feed steam ratio and the same level  of methyl mercaptan removal,
stripping black liquor at pH 12 requires at least double the number
of transfer units required for pH II.  At a constant feed to steam
ratio of 30:1 and pH 12, increasing the desired removal  of methyl
mercaptan from 90$ to 99% increases the number of transfer units from
5.3 to 19.1.  The capital  costs of the column would be almost
directly proportional to these numbers.  The study, therefore, suggests,
based upon the removal of methyl mercaptan, that the pH and feed
steam ratio both must be low to minimize capital costs. However, a low
feed steam ratio is reflected in an  increased steam cost, and a more
detailed optimization study would be required to select the actual
best conditions.
Utilizing the combinations of per cent removal of methyl mercaptan
(90% and 99%), feed to steam ratio (L/G), and column height (Ntu)
illustrated in Table VIII, the calculations were extended to include
the other major volatile components of interest, hydrogen sulfide,
methyl sulfide, methanol, and terpenes.  Concentrations of these
constituents to be expected  in the digester effluent black  liquor were
known from the prior prediction study (27).  Table  IX summarizes the
results obtained.
                                37

-------
                          TABLE VIII

          Tower Height and Process Steam Requirements
                for Methyl Mercaptan Removal by
                Steam Stripping of Black Liquor
Transfer Units Required for

L/G*
20
25
30
35
45
55
Steam Cost**

-------
Hydrogen sulfide is the most concentrated odorous compound in black
liquor and like methyl  mercaptan,  is also an ionizable substance which
shows increasing dissociation with increasing pH.  As shown in Table IX,
the removal of hydrogen sulfide from black liquor by steam stripping
is very dependent upon  both pH and feed to steam ratio.  For steam
rates under consideration in this  study, the removal of hydrogen
sulfide does not exceed \2% for pH I I  or 2.5% for pH 12.  Thus, steam
stripping of black liquor will not appreciably decrease H?S levels in
condensate streams from flash tanks and evaporators.
Published vapor equilibrium data for methanol-water (34) indicate that
the vaporization equilibrium constant at very low concentrations is
about 8,  independent of pH and may be assumed Independent of ionic
strength,  The methanol removal, then, depends mainly on the feed to
steam ratio.  The removal of methanol  for flow rates under consideration
varies from 22 to 36%.   Thus, additional removal of methanol further
along the black  liquor concentration path may be desirable.
Methyl sulfide and terpenes, which have much higher vaporization
equilibrium constants  (25) are more than 99/6 removed  in the black
liquor stripping column for all cases under consideration.
Four cases from those  presented in Tables VIII and  IX were chosen
for further calculations to extend the predicted distribution of these
volatile  constituents  through the  remainder of the  black  liquor
concentration process.   These are  summarized as  Table X.
The distribution of volatile  compounds between the  vapor  and  liquid
phases of the flash tanks,  Figure  4, was calculated  as  a  continuous
equilibrium vaporization  (35).  In the  process scheme  used here, the
overhead  product from  the  first flash tank  is fed to the  steaming
vessel to preheat chips before they enter the digester.   The  vapor-
 liquid distribution between  condensed steam and  steaming  vessel  relief
was also  treated as an equilibrium vaporization  (36).
                                39

-------
        o
        O
        3
        I
        M
     /! \
                 Relief
                  c
                   I
      Chips

       I
Steaming
 vessel
1






I '
2
% o
» JT
0 (ft
•o
1
o
IT

M
O
3
                                              Rash
                                              steam
                                            Air out
                                             I
                                            Weak

                                           liquor

                                         oxidation
                                                                     Liquor  to

                                                                     evaporators
        Back wash
Figure 4. Flash  concentration  and oxidation steps in black  liquor recovery (27),

-------
                            TABLE X
     Operating Parameters of Black Liquor Stripping Column
     for Cases Extended to Steam Stripping of Condensates
Case
1
Ma
Mb
III
Meth Merc,
Removal
90%
90%
99%
99%
Feed: Steam
ratio
45
30
30
25
Ntu
5.4
5.3
5.3
9.2
pH
1 1
12
1 1
12
Steam
Cost tf/ADT
22
33
33
39
Weak liquor oxidation at 0%, 10% and 95% efficiency was considered for
each of the four cases and was subject to the assumptions of reference
(27), namely, cocurrent or complete mix flow, and phase equilibrium.
For no oxidation, the larger amount of feed to the first two evaporators
(#5 and #6, in parallel) was compensated for by arbitrarily increasing
the amount of evaporation from these two units.
Calculations of vapor-liquid distribution show that in this flow scheme
the only compounds lost in significant quantity with the exit air
from the oxidation tower are hydrogen sulfide and methanol.  To
minimize hLS emission from this source, high black liquor pH and
oxidation efficiency of 95% or above is recommended.  The methanol loss
is independent of oxidation efficiency and pH and depends only on the
flow rate of air through the oxidation system and the entering methanol
concentration.   If recovery of methanol is to be an economic considera-
tion, the fact that 25% to 30$ of the methanol from the digester  is
lost during oxidation may be very significant.
The oxidized black liquor is subjected to multi-effect evaporation in
six stages, followed by direct contact evaporation in the  flow system
model utilized here, as shown  in Figure 5.  Calculations were extended
through each of the six evaporator stages for each of the  four cases,
                                41

-------
M
                               ro
                               o>
                             0)

                             •o
                             00

                             o
                        Stm.
           ro
           o>
           *.
            o
         CO
Flue gas
   OUT
   r  stm.
                     i
                              1A

                              V
                    direct

                   contact

                  evaporator
          IB
                                N

                                IN)
 T>
 (A

 o
\   /
                                  Condensed steam
  Flue gas in


Black liquor in
                  Concentrated  black  liquor
            co
            to
             o
                           03


                           \   /
                                     03
                                                 •3.
                                                 lO
                                                                  \
   00
    o
 ro -n



 I



\   /

•»
                                                                                           _to	9

                                                                                        condenser
ca
 o
                                                                    r\>
                                                                    ->i_

                                                                    a
                                                             Evaporator  condensates
                                                                                             03

                                                                                             o
                                                                                             n



,1
y










f2




y






3,



r




X
\
Skirr
tanh

/
^
«
i
i

/



^


fi




¥



-/



\_


,5
               Figure  5.  Multieffect  evaporation stages  and  direct contact  evaporators  (27)

-------
and for each of the three levels of oxidation of 0$,  7055 and  95%.
These results are summarized and compiled as Tables XI,  XII,  XIII,  and
XIV.
Note that the tables show quantitatively much of what has been
indicated earlier in a qualitative way.   For example, terpenes and
methyl sulfide are removed in the black  liquor stripping column.
Methyl mercaptan is removed to the extent fixed by the design basis
for the case under consideration (9Q% to 99%}.  Hydrogren sulfide
continues to be removed steadily throughout the evaporation process,
depending upon the oxidation level and pH.  The release of H  S with
the oxidation tower air effluent is decreased about fourfold  with
pH change from II to 12 (131.7 vs 35,4,  or 28.2 vs 7.1).  A change
in oxidation level from 10% to 95% decreases this release approximately
fivefold (131.7 vs 28.2, or 35.3 vs 7.1).  Methanol volatilizes
steadily but at a diminishing extent throughout the multi-effect
evaporator train, though after the first two parallel effects (#6 and
#5), only about  \0% of the original methanol remains and this is
almost entirely evaporated in the remaining five stages, to appear in
the condensates.  A small quantity of dimethyl disulfide is found in
the oxidation tower from the remaining methyl mercaptan.  This is.
released with the air from the oxidation system and negligible quantities
should appear  in subsequent condensates.
Column Requirements for Steam Stripping of Selected Condensates together
with Black Liquor Stripping
Energy balances show that the vapors from black liquor stripping are
sufficient to strip all condensates depicted  in Figure 3 for the 550
ton-per-day pulp mill used as a model.  This  is shown as being done
through  indirect heat exchange  in a reboiler because of the contaminants
in this  steam source.  The resulting SEKOR B overhead condensate,
steaming vessel  relief condensate, and No. 2  flash condensate have
similar  levels of contaminants, and are  fed to the stripping  column

                                43

-------
                                     Table XI
                    Summary of Volatile Component Distribution
                                      Case I
S S
Source
Digester
it
Sekor B overhead
Sekor B bottoms
FT-I overhead
(to steam vessel
it
St.Vess.Relf.
FT-I bottoms
*
FT-2 overhead
FT-2 bottom*
Oxidation Level
X
Ox tower V
Ox tower L
Evaps
*
6-overhead
6-bottomj
*
5-overhead
5-bottoms
4-overhead
it-bottoms
ft
J -over head
3-bot corns
2 -overhead
2-bottoms
IB-overhead
IB-bottoms
lA-overhead
lA-bottoms
Si
OL J>
t •—
O
277

277
0
0


0
0

0
0





















C L.
a "o.^
(I —
1—
35.8

35.8
0
0


0
0

0
0





















H2S
[Ib.S,
1 hr J
3589

269
3320
405


2915
255

2660

0




709
621

497
833
445
1009

379
630
310
320
159
160
43
117
196
70
131.7
666.3


179
154

126
207
106
254

99.1
155.3
80.8
74.5
33-0
35.5
9.4
26.1
95
28.2
04.8


28
24

19.9
32.5
16.7
39.9

15.6
24.3
12.7
11.6
6.1
5.5
1.5
4.0
CHjSH [^r-l
21.30

19.17
2.13
1.75


.38
.30

.08
1.65
0




0392
0008

.039
.001











70
.022
.002


















95
.0037
,0003


















HeOH [Ib/hr]
357.7

78.7
279
91


188
46

142
47.9
0




56.7
14.3

53.7
17.3
16.7
14.9

8.9
6.0
4.1
1.9
1.3
0.6
.25
.35
70 S 95
107.8
34.2


12.8
4.3

11.7
5.4
5.1
4.6

2.8
1.8
1.2
0.6
0.4
0.2
.08
.12

[il.i
hr
2.7

2.7































(CH3)2S2l!^












0




















70
.055
.001


















95
.075
.001


















All column quantities are In Ib/hr (terpenes and methano!)  or Ib sulfur/hr  (sulfur cpds).
Case t - pH»ll (L/G)-^5, 90* methyl mercan.  removal, Ntu>5.4.
Streams amenable to steam stripping.
                               44

-------
                                    Table XII
                    Summary of Volatile Component Distribution
                                     Case I la
                  8
Source
digester
ft
Sekor B overhead
Sekor 6 bottoms
FT-1 overhead
(to steam vesse
*
St.Vess.ftelf.
FT-1 bottoms
ft
FT- 2 overhead
FT-2 bottoms
Oxidation Level
t
Ox tower V
Ox tower L
Evaps
6-overhead
6-bottoms
5-overhead
5-bottoms
ft -overhead
4-bottoms
3-overhead
3-bottoms
2-overhead
2-bottoms
IB-overhead
IB-bottoms
lA-overhead
IB-bottoms
Ji
277

277
0
0
)

0
0

0
0


















c u
?~
35.8

35.8
0
0


0
0

0
0


















u c Ib.S-i
H2S -FT"1
3582

57
3525
96


3429
54

3375
94.1
0



236
1452
166
1522
205
2769
269
2500
378
2122
357
1765
12.4
164.1
70
35 A
977.1

69.8
418. £
49.3
439.3
56.7
801.1
81.0
720.4
119.6
600.8
109.1
491.7
33.4
458.3
95
7.1
161.;

11. <
69.:
8.2
72.3
9.3
132.7
13.:
119.2
19.9
99.3
18.
81.2
5.6
75.6
HjSH t^—1
20.4

18.36
2.04
1.53


.51
.36

.15
1.44
0



.065
.010
.064
.011










70
.039
.006

.004
0












95
.0067
.0008















HeOH [Ib/hr]
357.7

89.7
268
87


181
45

136
45.8
0



54.4
13.6
51.5
16.5
15-9
14.2
8.5
5.7
3.9
1.8
1.3
0.5
.21
.29
70 & 95
103.4
32.6

12.3
4.0
11.3
5-0
4.8
4.2
2.5
1.7
1.2
0.5
.3
,2
.08
.12
3 i.
3.6

3.6
~0
-o


-o
-0

-o
-o


















««3>2V^
0

0
0
0


0
0

0
0
0

















70
.103
.002















95
.141
.002















All column quantities are In Ib/hr (terpenes S methanol) or  Ib  sulfur/hr  (sulfur
     compounds).
Case Ha:  pH-12, L/G-30, 90% methyl  mercaptan removal, Ntu-5.3
Streams amenable to  stream  strlPP;n9-
                              45

-------
           Table XIII
iry of Volatile Component Distribution
             Case lib

Source

Digester
Sekor B overhead
Sekor B bottoms
FT-1 overhead
(to steam vessel
*St.Vess.Re1f.
FT-1 bottoms
FT-2 overhead
FT-2 bottoms
Oxidation Level
t
Ox tower V
Ox tower L
Evaps
6-overhead
6-bottoms
*
5-overhead
5-bottoms
*.
M-overhead
4-bottoms
3-overhead
3-bottomi
2-overhead
2 -bottoms
1 6 -overhead
IB-bottoms
*
lA-overhead
lA-bottoms
|i
O- -O
n
277
277
0
0

0
0
0
0




















c •-
8 t £

35.8
35.8
0
0

0
0
0
0





















H S l-^-^\
2 hr

3589
406
3183
388

2795
245
2550
94.1
0



679
596

476
799
427
968
364
604
298
306
153
153

42
111
70
126.2
638.8

171.8
147.6

121.2
198.2
101.9
243.9
95.0
148.9
77.5
71.4
27.4
44.0

11.7
32.3
95
27.0
100.5

27.1
23.2

19.05
31.2
16.1
38.3
15.0
23.3
12.2
11.1
5.8
5.3

1.4
3.9

CH.SH [^N

21.3
21.1
.213
.175

.038
.030
.008
0.144
0



0039
0001

0039
0001











70
0022
0002

















95
0003!
oooo:


















HeOH [Ib/hr]

357.7
78.7
279
87

181
*5
136
40
9



54.4
13.6

51.5
16.5
15-9
14.2
8.5
5.7
3.9
1.8
1.3
.5

.21
.29
70 & 95
103.4
32.6

12.3
4.0

11.3
5.0
4.8
4.2
2.5
1.7
1.2
0.5
0.3
0.2

0.08
0.12
3'2a
HM
hr
2.7
2.7
-0
-0

-0
-0
-0
-0




















All column quantities In Ib/hr (terpenes, met Hanoi) or Ib sulfur/hr (sulfur

322 hr

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0



















70
0055
.0001

















95
.0075
.0001

















compounds) .
Case lib - pH-11, L/G-30, 99* methyl mercaptan removed, Ntu-5.3.
*
Streams amenable to steam stripping.
      46

-------
                                      Table  XIV

                     Summary of Volatile Component  Distribution

                                      Case III

Source
Digester
Sekor B overhead
Sekor B bottoms
FT-I overhead
(to (team vessel
*St.Vess.Relf.
FT-I bottoms
FT-2 overhead
FT-2 bottoms
Oxidation Level
t
Ox tower V
Ox tower L
Evaps
6-overhead
6-bottoms
5-overhead
5-bottoms
4-overhead
4-bottoms
3-overhead
3-bottoms
2-overhead
2-bottoms
IB-overhead
IB-bottoms
lA-overhead
lA-bottoms
§i
«— *v
a. A
0 ~"
277
277
-0
-0

-0
-0
-0
-0


















c >~
£f
35.8
35.8
-0
-o

-0
-0
-0
-0



















H,S l!4-£-]
i nr
3582
68
3514
96

3418
54
3364
94.1
0



237
1445
165
1517
204
2758
268
2490
376
2114
356
1758
11.5
164.3
70
35.3
973.9

69. 5
417.5
49.1
437.9
56.5
798.9
80.7
718.:
119.3
599. C
108.;
490.;
32 .(
458.:
95
7.1
161.1

11.5
69.1
8.2
72.4
9.2
132.3
13.4
118.9
19.8
99.1
17.9
81.2
5.6
75.6

CHjSH [' *\£ ]
20.4
20.2
.204
.153

.051
.036
.015
0.144
0



0065
0010
0064
0011










70
.003*
.oooe















95
0006
0000
















HeOH [Ib/hr]
357.7


76

157
39
118
40
0



47.2
11.8
44.7
14.3
13.8
12.3
7.4
4.9
3.3
1.6
1.1
0.5
.04
.06
70 & 95
89.9
28.1

10.7
3.35
9.8
4.25
4.0
3.6
2.2
1.4
1.0
0.4
0.3
0.1


Hj)2i
Ib.S]
hr
3.6
3.6
-0
-0

-0
-0
-0
-0



















"S'z8!1^1
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

















70
0103
0002

0001
0












95
.0141
.0002

.0001
0












All column quantities expressed as Ib/hr  (methanot,  terpenes) or Ib sulfur/hr (sulfur
    compounds).
Case Ml:   pH-12.  (L/O-25,  99* methyl  mercaptan  removed, Ntu-9.2
Streams amenable to steam stripping.
                                       47

-------
SEKOR A shown.  Optional  removal of turpentine  from  Column  B
condensate and steaming  vessel  relief  condensate is  also shown.
The amount and composition of  the  resultant overhead "concentrate"  and
of the decontaminated condensate bottoms  are  shown  in Table XV.
Quantities of volatile components  shown  in this  table are reported  as
pounds per air-dried ton  of  pulp.  The table  footnote relates  this
unit of measurement to that  of  Tables  XI  to XIV.  Column dimensions
required  for 15% and 90%  removal of remaining methanol  content are
shown in  Table XVI.  Column  conditions are as depicted in Figure  3.

                           TABLE XV
          Case Ma - Composition of Feed  and  Product
                   Streams of  SEKOR A  Column
                    "Volatile  Component  in Ib/ADT**  or Ib.  sulfur/ADT
                       U/a+^r-  Tar-nan^e  l-l C   PUI  CLI    f PU ^ C     PU fM-l
                       Wo I ol    I CI pt? It Co n«O   L/n -*Dn    V wil« / /*3     Lfll -f\J\\
Feed Stream
SEKOR B Overhead
Steaming Vessel
Rel ief
2nd Flash Overhead
Overhead Product
Stripped Condensate

700
200
780
5 to 25
1655

13.7
nil
nil
13.7
ni 1

2.5
4.2
2.35
9.0
ni 1

0.8
0.072
0.016
0.89
ni 1

0.16
nil
ni 1
0.16
nil

3.9
2.0
2.0
5.9
2.0
*  For Fd/stm-5.0, 75^ MeOH removal of Table X
** For a 550 ADT per day pulp production  Ib/hr  (.0436) =  Ib/ADT  for
   any constituent.

Evaporator condensates resulting from concentration of the stripped
black liquor also contain some contaminants, chiefly hydrogen  sulfide
and methanol, the latter chiefly appearing during evaporation  from  1756
to 22% solids, represented by the No. 5 and No. 6 evaporator condensates.
These condensates are shown in Figure 3 as feed to a separate  stripping
column employing SEKOR B overhead as heat medium.  Tables XVII and
XVIII summarize resulting overhead and bottoms concentrations, and
                               48

-------
required column dimensions for the particular case of Q% oxidation
level  of case 11-a.  This column and its required conditions are also
shown in Figure 3.

                           TABLE XVI
             Case  I la - SEKOR A Column Design for
                     Condensate Stripping
Fd/Stm
(2.4)min
2.8
5.0
10.0
2.5
4.2
8.3
Steam
Ib/hr
16,000
13,700
7,700
3,900
15,600
9,200
4,600
Reflux
Ratio

70.4
40.6
19.8
(I5.2)min
70.4
40.6

No. Ideal
Stages

4.0
4.7

5.0
6.3

Column
Diameter
(ft)

5.5
4.5

6.0
4.5
3.0
% MeOH
Remova 1
75
ii
M
11
90
IT
II
                          TABLE XVII
          Case  Ma - Composition of Feed and Product
       Streams  SEKOR Column C Stripping Evap. Condensates


Feed Stream
#5 and #6
Evap. Cond.
Overhead Product
Stripped Condensate
"Volatile
Water
4500
3 to 15
5055
Component
Terpenes
ni 1
ni 1
nil
in Ib/ADT or Ib. sulfur/ADT
HC PU CU 1 PU \ C
«;> Un-.5n von,/«o
17.5 0.006 nil
17.5 0.006 nil
nil nil nil
CH3OH
4.62
3.47
1.15
 *  For  Fd/Stm = 8.0,  75* MeOH  removal.
                                49

-------
                            TABLE  XVIII
               Case Ma  -  SEKOR Column C  Design  for
                  Evaporator Condensate Stripping
Fd/Stm


7.2
8.0
Steam
Ib/hr

14,300
12,800
Ret 1 ux
Ratio

12.8
11.5
No. Ideal
Stages

8.2
1 1.0
Col umn
Diameter
(ft)
5.5
5.0
% MeOH
Remova 1

75
75
 Table  XIX  compares the total final condensate  load, as pounds of vola-
 tile contaminants per ADT of pulp, with the corresponding condensate
 load if  no black  liquor stripping and no condensate stripping is
 practiced.  The  latter information is from the previous study of
 Tsuchiya and Johanson (27).

                            TABLE XIX
              Comparison of Contaminant Content of
           Condensates Without and With Steam Stripping
                                     Total Volatiles Content* Ib/ADT
                                  Without Stripping       With Stripping
Combined Condensates
to 17$ B. L. Solids
Combined Condensates
\1% to 22% B. L. Solids
29.0
23.9
2.0
I.I
* Includes methanol, terpenes, H?S, CH,SH, (CH )?S, with sulfur com-
  pounds as pounds sulfur equivalent.

Improved Phase Equilibrium and Solubility Data
The prior detailed calculations of volatiles behavior during flash
evaporations and steam stripping, and Indeed all  prior design studies of
this system are based upon a simplification of the vapor-liquid
equilibrium situation.  Simplification is necessary because the actual
                                50

-------
number of volatile components is at least fifteen,  consisting  of  several
terpenes in addition to a-pinene;  several  terpineols in addition  to
a-terpineol; and acetone, ethanol, methyl  isobutyl  ketone in addition
to methanol; together with the four sulfur compounds—hydrogen sulfide,
methyl mercaptan, methyl sulfide and dimethyl  sulfide.  The simplifica-
tions were basically to treat the multi-component system as a  collection
of binary systems with water, utilizing the vapor-liquid binary equili-
brium data with water.  With all substances except water present only
in trace amounts, this simplification may be justifiable.  Under
conditions of concentration of methanol and terpenes to higher levels,
as in the upper sections of stripping column A with reflux, the
assumptions involved may not be valid.
An assessment of the validity of these assumptions and an improved
method of developing multi-component correlations of equilibrium data
to supplant these techniques, has been made by Mr. Robert T. Ruggeri
in work supported by this contract and reported in detail as a Master's
thesis study (37).  Results obtained in this work are discussed in the
foI lowing pages.
The technique consisted  first of  reducing the muIti-component system
to a  five-component system, water, methanol, a-pinene, a-terpineol and
methyl sulfide, where each compound represents a "family" of compounds
similar  in  polarity and  chemical  nature.  This in turn was shown to be
reducable to three ternary systems, because only water and methanol
appear  in moderate to  large concentrations  in the  industrial problem
of interest here.  Mr.  Ruggeri  then developed a technique for
predicting  the ternary  equilibrium behavior for the systems from binary
equilibrium data available  in the literature or obtained experimentally
in the thesis  investigation.  This technique was based essentially  upon
the equations of Renon  and Prausnitz  (38).  An added  advantage of the
approach  is that extrapolations of equilibrium relationships  from the
region of available experimental  data  (such as 25°C)  to  the level of

-------
 design  interest  (such  as  IOO°C)  is  much more  sound than the direct
 extrapolation  of  curves.   Renon's equations are based on the molecular
 pairwise  interactions  of  closest neighbors.   By utilizing such a model,
 an  expression  for the  activity  coefficients of the components was
 obtained  which yielded good  results for several molecularly dissimilar
 systems.   For  binary systems, Renon's equations for the activity
 coefficient of the  first  component  are as  follows:

      In Y! =C62I(G2I/(XI+X2G2I))2 + 6|2G|2/(X2 + X|G|2)2^ *^ •     (ll)
 where               G|2 =  exp '-a^6^' and                       ( I2)

                    G2I =  exp (-a|252|K                           (I3)
 The quantities ct|2, 6._, 62  may be  treated as empirical constants,
 although  a.^ is related to the coordination number and as such has some
 physical  significance.  It is found  experimentally, however, that smalI
 variations in a 2 do not significantly effect the ability of Equations
 (II), (12), and (13) to represent experimental data.  Furthermore, the
 value of  a.2 is characteristic of the types of compounds involved in
 the 1-2 interaction.  This means that the system of Equations (II),
 (12), and  (13)  can be considered a two constant equation for the
 activity  coefficient.  The Renon equations also enjoy two additional
 advantages over the Margules type equations:  the activity coefficient
 for the i    component of a muIticomponent mixture can be written in
 terms of  binary data only, and the temperature dependence of the
empirical  constants, 6 2 and 62|, is found to be linear with reciprocal
temperature.   Both of these advantages result from the fact that only
 pairwise  nearest neighbor  interactions are considered in the Renon
 liquid model.   The disadvantage of the Renon equations is the added
computational  complexity,  but the advantages are enough to justify their
 use, especially for multicomponent work.
An important advantage the Renon equations hold over the more convention-
al methods of  describing excess molal Gibbs energy (g ) is that the

                                52

-------
Renon constants can be found from linear functions  of  temperature.
From Renon!s work the delta constants were defined  as  follows:
                      /RT,                       (14)

                      62I  = (g2l " 9||)/RT'                       (I5)
          and              g|2 = g2|,                             (16)
where g..  is the energy of interaction between a pair  of molecules,  i
and j.  The functions of g, i.e., (g. . - g..), were then determined
                                     •J    J J
experimentally to be linear in temperature.  Renon  demonstrated this
temperature dependence for at least two systems over a temperature
range of 50°C.
One of the primary advantages of using Renon  type equations to describe
the nontdeality of solutions is that these equations can be generalized
to multicomponent systems without making any  additional assumptions.
The more conventional methods of describing the compositional dependence
of activity coefficients is to use power series in mole fraction.  Wohl's
expansion for g , used to describe multicomponent mixtures,  involves
terms related to molecular  interactions.  For instance, the constant
a|2 is related to the  1-2 molecular  interaction and a..„ is  related to
the three-body interaction  involving two molecules of component one
and one molecule of component two.  Wohl's equation for g  can be
considered a power series  In volume  fraction, and when this equation
is fitted to experimental  data,  as many terms are used as are needed
to give the desired accuracy.   All the two-body constants of the
Won I equation can be calculated  by studying binary solutions, but
ternary system behavior may not  be represented  accurately  if only the
two-body terms are  included in  the ternary Wohl expansion.   The only way
to check the  reliability of this equation  is  to study  the  ternary
system and evaluate the three-body constants.   If the  two-body constants
are  large with respect to  the three-body  constants, the Wohl expansion
can be determined  from binary data.  Both  the Van  Laar equations  and
the Margules  equations can  be derived  from Wohl's  expansion  and,

                                 53

-------
therefore, their use is  governed  by  similar considerations.
Unlike the Won I  type equations, the  Renon expansion of g  was derived
by considering only nearest neighbor two-body  interactions.  The Renon
equation, therefore, can be determined  from binary data only, without
making any additional  assumptions.   The multicomponent Renon expression
for the excess molal Gibbs  energy, for  a system of N components is
as fol lo»s:         N        N              N
            9/RT^,x>  % 4jiGjixj"(jiiGkixk)'              (I7>
where                 6..  =  (g.. -  g::)/RT,                       (18)
                           = (g   - g..)/RT,
                                  ajjS.,),                         (20)
and
By differentiating Equation (17)  appropriately, the  following
expression is obtained for the activity  coefficient:
                          N           N
            In y.  = D.  +      (x.G. ./     G. .x. )  (6. . - D.,),        (22)
                i     I    p]     J  U jjEy   kJ  k     ij    2
                         N             N
where             D,  = (S"  «..G..x.)/(     G. .x, ),                 <23)
                   I     Jrj   Ji  Ji  J    £r|   kl  k
                         N              N
and               D, = (     x 6  .G .)/(     G. .x. ).                 (24)
                   2    (^7   m mj  mj   ^j   kj  k

The primary goal  of this  project was  to  describe  in some way the
chemical and phase equilibrium of  the mixture of  components which might
be present in a commercial  steam stripper designed for odor reduction
of condensates in a kraft pulp mill.   Since the number of components in
such a piece of equipment is large, a total  analysis of the system
would require a great deal  of time and labor.   In order to simplify the
                                54

-------
problem, three compounds representing different classes  of  organic
chemicals were chosen:   a-terpineol,  dimethyl  sulfide,  and  pinene,  and
each of these three compounds was studied in a ternary  system with
water and methanol.  This fact should not be interpreted to imply that
water and methanol  do not represent classes of compounds, but rather,
that these two chemicals were assumed to be present throughout the
column; therefore,  they were considered as components of every ternary
system.  Each ternary system was studied by analyzing only  binary
systems.  Thus, the system of water-methanol-pinene was  studied by
analyzing the three binary systems of water-methanol, water-pinene, and
methanol-pinene.  The systems were investigated at two  temperatures
wherever possible.   The glass apparatus used prohibited  analysis at
pressures above atmospheric; therefore, some systems were analyzed  at
only one temperature.
Once the binary systems had been analyzed, their behavior was character-
ized by the use of  activity coefficients.  The Renon equations were
used for this purpose.   The Renon method was chosen because it can  be
generalized from binary data to mult{component systems  without making
any additional simplifying assumptions, and because the temperature
dependence of the constants can be represented as  linear functions  of
temperature.  The basic plan of attack is, then, to study three ternary
mixtures which represent mixtures of three classes of organic compounds,
and to characterize the behavior of these mixtures with activity coef-
ficients which are functions of composition at constant temperature.
The data collected on all the systems were analyzed basically by
computer.  Some systems  involving only two data points  were calculated
by hand, but all systems utilizing more than two data points were ana-
lyzed with the aid of a computer.  Simple programs were written
utilizing, wherever possible, Boeing  library subroutines available at
the University of Washington computer center.  All the  programs were
designed to give some kind of average fit to the data.   Usually a

                                 55

-------
 least squares averaging process was used.  The solubility data were fit
 by  least squares polynominals  in temperature.  The Renon equations were
 fit to the data by the same type of procedure, but the calculations
 utilized a library program designed to solve a system of non-linear
 algebraic equations.
 The results obtained from the work described previously can be
 classified into two groups:  the binary results calculated from experi-
 mental data, and the ternary results predicted from the binary results.
 The ternary results are of primary concern here, since they are to be
 essentially derived from the binary results and would be of value in
 making detailed design calculations for separation columns.  Binary
 system experimental results and computed equation constants based
 upon the results are shown in Tables XX to XXII.
 Figures 6, 7, 8, and 9 show the more important of these ternary
 equilibrium relationships.  Figure 6 shows the only direct ternary
 equilibrium data available to date superimposed on the ternary
 diagram results for 25°C.  The tie-lines linking liquid phases in
 equilibrium show reasonable agreement between the experimental  and
 theoretical  results.  Comparison of Figures 6 and 7 shows the influence
 of temperature in this methanol-water-a-pinene ternary.
 Appraisal  of Approaches
 Earlier methodology applied to studies of the removal of volatile and
 odorous components from aqueous streams have been extended to include
 consideration of more of the volatile components, stripping of black
 liquor, stripping of condensates in dual columns, and the vapor-liquid
equilibrium relationships prevailing in the multi-component system.
 Some guidelines may be useful as to the extent that one or more of
 these approaches should be adopted in a given situation.
                                56

-------
                            TABLE  XX
               Water-Organic Binary System  Results
                    H20 IN a-TERPINEOL @  25°C
            Average Solubility = 47.65 gml-LO/l.  sin.
                    H0 IN a-TERPINEOL @  58°C
            Average Solubility = 27.56 gm HJVI.  sin.
                         a = 1.76 = 6.4%
                       a-TERPINEOL IN HJD
Polynominal  Order
       I
       2
       3
Constants
C.
2.14
3.26
4.20

9 = P
b t,
C2 C3 C4
6.2 X I0~* 0.0 . 0.0
-4.2 X 10 , 3.6 X 10 -, 0.0 ,
-9.5 X 10 ^ 1.3 X 10 -4.8 X 10
Equations:
+ C2T + C3T2 + C4T3
            T = Temperature °C
            S = Solubility (gm a-Terpineol/l . soln. )
                          PINENE IN H20
Polynominal Order                      Constants
        I             I.14 X 10"^        I.7 X 10 ^         0.0
       2             9.95 X 10          2.4 X 10           -7.0 X 10
         Equations:  Same as for a-Terpineol solubility.
                 H20-DIMETHYL SULFIDE SYSTEM
Liquid Phase           Mole Fraction Water                   Temperature
  H20 rich                   0.9998                             25°C
  DMS rich                   0.0101                             25°C
                                57

-------
               TABLE XXI
Methanol-Organic Binary System Results
METHANOL-DI METHYL SULFIDE % 24°C METHANOL-DI METHYL SULFIDE @ 36°C
Mole Fraction
Liquid Phase
0.046
0.049
0. 1 15
0. 1 15
0.215
0.215
0.297
0.297
0.355
0.355
0.465
0.465
0.465
0,560
0.560
0.673
0.673
0.844
0.844
0.958


Liquid Mole
Fraction MeOH
0.773
0.788
0.803
0.872
0.883
0.891
0.949
0.953
0.958
0.974
0.976
0.978
Dimethyl Sulfide Mole Fraction
Vapor Phase Liquid Phase
0.405 0.041
0.422 0.041
0.581 0.041
0.588 0.203
0.692 0.203
0.685 0.203
0.729 0.874
0.736
0.727
0.758
0.822
0.829
0.823
0.835
0.829
0.851
0.853
0.885
0.890
0.897
Methanol-Terpineol System
Activity of Methanol
Activity of MeOH
at 26°C
0.671
0.705
0.727
0.813
0.827
0.840
0.915
0.928
0.928
0,956
0.964
0.964
Dimethyl Sulfide
Vapor Phase
0.435
0.493
0.413
0.664
0.664
0.685
0.874















Activity of MeOH
at 44°C
0.747
-
0.771
0.843
-
0.860
-
0.933
0.940
-
0.962
0.966
                   58

-------
             TABLE XXI  (Cont'd)

           Methane I-Pinene @ 24°C

Liquid Phase          Mole Fraction  Methanol
  MeOH rich
 Pinene rich
0.913
0.193
                 TABLE XXI I

 Summary of Margules Equation Constants For
               Binary Systems


Water ( 1 )
Pinene ( 1 )
Methanol (
Methanol (
Methanol (

System
- DMS (2)
- Water (2)
1 ) - Pinene (2)
1) - DMS (2)
1 ) - ct-Terpineol (2)

Temperature
25°C
25°C
25°C
24°C
24°C
Margul es
B
6.561
10.47
2.870
1.442
-1.363
Constants
C
1 .951
-2.648
0.037
-0.235
-0.152
                  Equations:

           lnv(  = X^  B - C(4X2 -3)

           Iny2 = X^  B + C(4Xj -3)
                 TABLE XXI I I

   Summary of Renon Equation  Constants
               Binary Systems
           For
Renon Constants
System
Water (1) - Methanol (2)
Water (1) - Methanol (2)
Water (1) - Pinene (2)
Water (1) - DMS (2)
Water (1) - Terpineol (2)
Water (1) - Terpineol (2)
Methanol (1) - Pinene (2)
Methanol (1) - Pinene (2)
Methanol (1) - DMS (2)
Methanol (1) - Terpineol (2)
Temperature
25°C
75°C
25°C
25°C
25°C
58°C
25°C
64°C
24°C
26°C
a!2
0.47
0.47
0.007
0.005
0.20
0.20
0.034
0.034
0.74
0.27
6!2
-0.162
-0.559
36.10
45.30
8.903
8.564
1.999
1.037
1.050
-1.241
52I
0.377
0.315
-19.85
-31.36
-0.283
0.275
1.000
0.802
2.00
- 1 . 397
                      59

-------
                                           MltHAHOL
 Mgurt

 rvtutt*.   Cooc«ntr»tl«\» «•• |t»*n
 u
    VATEK
ri«ur* 1.  ternary  UquW
        »t 100°C.
      in ml
                                          METHAKOJ.
  WATER
                                                                                   JHKEHE
                                             60

-------
                                           METHANOL
Figure I.  Ternary liquid equilibrium
reiult* «t 100°C.  concentration* «r«
given In aele fraction*.
   NATU
Fliurt  9,   Ternary liquid equilibrium
result* «t 100°C.  Coneentratlotui are
given In ••!• fractions.
                                                                                       DIMETHYL S III/1 DC
                                            MCTHANOL
    HATH
                                                                                      a-TCRPINEOL

-------
 First,  it  is the author's belief that  In the great majority of applica-
 tions,  steam stripping will be superior to air stripping of condensates.
 The major  advantages are (I) the elimination of the air contamination
 problem, (2) the possibility of readily and cheaply concentrating the
 stripped volatile components for burning or other disposal, or for
 subsequent recovery, and (3) the use of temperature of the condensate
 in the  column as a  readily controllable variable, by means of steam
 pressure.   Neither  air nor steam stripping are effective for removal of
 non-volatile compounds.
 The use of  a single column to strip only those condensates of highest
 concentration of volatile odorous components, or those to be directly
 discharged  rather than utilized within the mill, remains the most
 advantageous application of the SEKOR process at minimum cost.  The
 economics  of such a system, as described in prior work, Maas, et_. a I.
 (25), represents a minimal  installation of a column about one-third to
 one-half the cross-sectional  area considered in the present case.   If
 these capital  costs are scaled up by a factor of about 3.0 to provide
 for these  differences, the overall  costs should remain substantially
 valid today if costs and turpentine pricing are updated.  If methanol
 is also to be removed to levels less than 2.0 pounds per ton of pulp,
 then such a column will be inadequate, and two columns are recommended,
 stripping  flash and steaming vessel  relief condensates in the first,
 and about the first two evaporator stage condensates in the second.
 This would correspond to Figure 3 without the SEKOR B column for
 stripping black liquor.  Costs for such a dual  column system would be
 about double a single column installation, with steam and other utility
 costs also about double.   A bonus in such a column operation is that the
evaporation condensates are much more free of hydrogen sulfide and other
odorous volatile components than if untreated,  and more suitable for
 reuse or discharge.
                                62

-------
The concept of steam stripping black liquor at digester  pressure before
it is flashed appears to have considerable promise  for some  situations.
Such a system would require pilot scale investigations to  corroborate
the design studies reported here.  It would appear  to offer  the most
promise where recovery of turpentine in high yield  is an important
consideration, and where extreme requirements for extent of  removal
of methanol and odorous constituents from condensates to be  discharged
warrants the added cost of black liquor stripping.   Costs  for such  a
black liquor stripping column cannot be estimated with confidence with-
out pilot scale study of column operability, but it appears  from  this
design study that such a column would have a cross-sectional area  about
equal to the combined areas of condensate stripping columns  "A"  and "C"
of Figure 3.  Column height would be comparable to these columns.
Capital costs would be approximately double that of a two-column
condensate stripping system, but steam costs would be only slightly
higher, because of the steam re-use feature of the overall system.
                                 63

-------
                           SECTION  VI I
                    SEPARATION OF SEKOR OILS
General  Considerations
In the basic research and development of McCarthy,  Hrutfiord,  Johanson
et al  which established the SEKOR process,  the observation  was made  that
an oiI  phase would appear and could be collected separately from the
aqueous phase in the overhead stream if the fractionating column over-
head water phase was refluxed back  to the column.   The oil  phase was
mainly terpene hydrocarbons and organic sulfides,  while the aqueous
phase was mainly water together with smalI  quantities of water-soluble
organics such as methanol, ethanol, and acetone derived from the
pulping process.  Subsequent research and plans have been based upon
this observation.  H. Maahs and D.  Marsh,  working with Professor L.N.
Johanson, established in preliminary studies that the terpene hydro-
carbons and organic sulfur compounds (methyl  sulfide and dimethyi-
disulfide) could also be removed from condensates by counterflow solvent
extraction using petroleum hydrocarbon, as an alternate to steam
stripping.  The economics in general appeared less attractive than
steam stripping, however.
QiI-Water Separations
Early bench scale experiments revealed that SEKOR oils consisted in
part of the terpenes ordinarily found  in commercial turpentines, with
perhaps  larger than expected amounts of terpineols.  A  large fraction,
however, (approximately 40/£) of oil derived from blow gas condensate
consisted of sulfur compounds, chiefly the methyl sulfides.  Thus the
usual methods of sale or disposal of Kraft turpentines, consisting of
less than one per cent sulfur compounds—concentrated acid treatment,
chlorination, and caustic washing—seem not to be  ideal for the high
sulfur concentrations found  in SEKOR oils.  Furthermore, the high cost
and sulfur  losses associated with this approach would tend to discourage

                                65

-------
rather than encourage adoption of the SEKOR process by industry.  The
terpene hydrocarbons are largely within commercial turpentine boiling
range and would have value in commerce as a credit toward the costs of
operation of the SEKOR process.  The sulfur compounds (chiefly methyl-
mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide) are odorous,
unpleasant and noxious.  If they can be released from SEKOR terpene oil
in concentrated form, they would have value as makeup sulfur in the
pulping process, particularly if they could be reduced to hydrosulfide
form.
Fractional Disti1lation would appear to be a logical  method of separa-
tion of the oils into terpenes and sulfur compounds.   However, the
several terpenes,  terpineols, and sulfur compounds have overlapping
volatilities, which makes such separation complex.  A partial separa-
tion could perhaps be conducted if only a-pinene were to be recovered
from all other constituents.
So I vent Ext ract i on of the sulfur compounds from the terpenes, or vice
versa, would require a solvent with limited, but different solubility
for each class of compound.  Over twenty solvent systems were explored
as possibilities,  with terpene-dimethyl sulfide mixtures ranging from
10-90 to 90-10 molecular ratio.  The solvents were found to fall into
two groups, the larger group  being those having complete miscibility
with both terpenes and methyl sulfide, and a smaller group with little
or no solubility for either terpenes or methyl  sulfides.
Selective Adsorption Separations
This would appear to offer a  possible alternative separation method for
the two classes of compounds  terpenes and organic sulfides.  The former
compounds are all  ring structures, of molecular diameter exceeding 8
angstroms.  The sulfur compounds H_S, CH^SH, (CH^)^ are all linear
molecules, with diameters approximately 4 to 8 angstroms.  Methanol
would appear to associate with the sulfur components because of its
molecular shape, but its greater polarity makes prediction of its

                                66

-------
behavior  in this  respect difficult.  Possible selective agents for this
purpose are zeolites or synthetic zeolites, silica gel, and activated
carbon.   All have at  least a substantial portion of their pore diameters
within the probably useful 3 to 30 angstrom range.
The  zeolites which are crystalline a IuminosiIicates have long been known
in nature, and have long been  in use as water softening agents.  The
synthetic zeolites, however, are a relatively recent development.  They
differ from the natural crystals in having a controlled structure and a
controlled composition.  When  used as "molecular sieves" (a term coined
by J.W. McBain in  1926 for natural zeolites with pores  less than five
angstroms in diameter), the structure rather than the chemical composi-
tion is of most importance.  Such zeolites are now available commercially
with pore diameters less than  3, 4,  5,  10, or  13 angstroms respectively.
Silica gel and activated carbon have much broader pore  size distributions
than the  synthetic zeolites.   Activated carbon or charcoal was not
tested  in this study.
Solvent Extraction Separation  jtudies
The  exploratory search for suitable  solvents, or extractive distillation
agents has not been promising. The  major  difficulty appears to  be that
the  methyl groups of  methyl sulfides and mercaptan make their  solvent
characteristics similar to the terpene  hydrocarbons.   Consequently a
solvent which  is  miscible with terpenes  is  also  found  to be completely
miscible  with the sulfur  compounds.  Such  solvents tested  have included
acetone,  butyl alcohol, n-butyl ether,  chloroform, ethyl alcohol
'methanol, n-hexane, dimethyl  aniline, and  pyridine.  All of these
solvents  were  found completely miscible with a-terpene - dimethyl
sulfide mixtures  ranging  from \0%  -  90% to 90% -  \0%  in composition.
Additional  solvents tested with both dimethyl  disulfide and dimethyl
sulfide,  as  well  as terpene mixture  were:   carbon  dlsulfide,  dimethyl
sulfide,  benzene, toluene,  cyclohexane,  carbon tetrachloride,  phenol,
 nitrobenzene and  cresol.   The same results of  complete miscibility were
                                 67

-------
 found.  At the other extreme,  liquids which are essentially Immiscible
with terpenes, which include ethylene glycol and water, are also found
to dissolve dimethyl sulfide to an extent less than detectable by the
techniques used, approximately 0.5/K.
A search was conducted for solvents which would selectively remove
either the terpenes or the sulfur compounds for use in extraction
processes.  Both literature search and laboratory experiments with a
variety of solvent classes proved negative,  in that solubility of the
terpenes and of sulfur compounds were too similar in a given solvent
to allow for an economically attractive separation process.
Thus extraction systems of promise have not been found.  Some possibil-
 ities still exist,  for example liquid HF and liquid S0_, as used in the
petroleum  industry for desulfurizing.  These are unattractive as
solvents for reasons of refrigeration requirements and toxicity of HF,
and are intended for thiophene class sulfur compound removal as well.
Selective Adsorption Separation of Terpenes  and Sulfur Compounds
The SEKOR oils consist largely of the two classes of compounds, terpenes
and methyl  sulfur compounds.   The terpenes found in the volatile
fractions of Kraft turpentine are substantially all  monocyclic (Iimonene,
a-terpineol),  or dicyclic (pinenes,  carene,  camphene).  Their molecular
diameters thus exceed five angstroms, whereas the molecular diameter of
methyl  mercaptan is 5.0 angstroms.  Methyl sulfides, being linear
molecules,  should similarly have a molecular diameter normal to the bond
directions of  about five angstroms.   Thus it should be possible to
selectively remove the sulfur compounds from the terpenes in a batch or
semi-continuous process.  One such process,  utilized to separate straight
chain paraffins from iso-paraffins or naphthenes, is described in
reference 39.   Experiments were conducted utilizing "Linde" brand molec-
ular sieves (synthetic crystal Itne  alumino-siIicates), and silica gel.
The molecular sieves have narrow pore size distribution while the silica
gel  has a broad spectrum of pore sizes.  Molecular sieve 3A, 5A, IOA

                                68

-------
and I3X were tested.   The 3A and 5A materials,  with approximately  3
angstrom and 5 angstrom pores,  were found non-selective with  respect
to sulfur compound removal  from terpenes.  The  10-A and I3X materials,
of approximately 8 angstrom and 10 angstrom pores,  respectively were
found to preferentially retain  the sulfur compounds from the  terpenes.
The extent to which this occurs was determined  utilizing packed columns
of crushed and pelleted sieve material, and determination of  break-
through curves using mixtures of a-pinene or commercial turpentine and
dimethyl sulfide.  Analysis was by means of gas liquid partition chrom-
atography, for which calibration data were established for the above
constituents and methanol.   Methanol was utilized as a column purge,  with
regeneration by evaporation of the methanol remaining by heating the
co Iumn.
Silica gel was also found to retain selectively the sulfur compounds,
with techniques much as utilized with the molecular sieves.
Laboratory experiments were planned such as to furnish suitable design
data for  larger scale application.  Continuous adsorption techniques
have been developed and reported  in the  literature utilizing moving
bed or sequencing feed and withdrawal  lines.   It is  likely, however,  that
for the scale of operation required for  processing SEKOR oils a batch
sequence technique would prove preferable.  In either  case, required
design data would include break-through  curves for both adsorption and
regeneration steps, at a given temperature, flow rate, and column  length.
The S shaped break-through curve  for adsorption represents the transition
from purified terpene effluent and effluent having the composition of the
feed material, as a result of exhaustion of the column capacity.
Similarly, the break-through curve  for  regeneration  represents the
transition between methanol-sulfur  compound mixtures and pure methanol,
signifying regeneration  is complete.
Break-through curves have been obtained  for silica gel and for  10
angstrom  molecular sieve, with a-pinene  methyl sulfide mixtures.   For

                                69

-------
the  latter adsorbent, successful regeneration by elution with methanol,
followed by drying has also been demonstrated.  This regenerated
molecular sieve is found to be essentially the same as the original
material, giving almost superposition of adsorption break-through
curves.
The  most effective adsorbent found for selectively removing, for example,
dimethyI disuIf ide from a-pinene was si Iica geI, with 13 to 20 ml.  of
solute-free terpene (ct-pinene) recovered from a 29 ml. (0.64 cm by  90
cm)  gel-packed column before the appearance of the break-through curve
for  dimethyl  disulfide.   Much less effective separation was obtained
            o                o
using eight Angstrom and ten Angstrom molecular sieves.  The five
Angstrom sieve material  was found to have no selectivity for sulfur
compound removal.
The  finding that silica  gel was superior as a selective adsorbent for
methyl sulfides compared to molecular sieves was unexpected.  It was
earlier postulated that the narrow size  ranges of pores in the sieves
should be ideal  for removing the straight chain methyl sulfides from
the  ring-structure terpenes.   Silica gel  has a broad range of pore
sizes, and its superior effectiveness suggests factors other than
molecular shape are more important in this separation.
Twenty-five sets of break-through data were obtained all  at room tem-
perature, comprising four adsorbents, three flow rates and four sulfur
compound-terpene concentrations.  The more significant data obtained
are summarized in Table XXIV.  Additional  data,  together with a
discussion of equivalent mass transfer coefficients, and application to
possible scale-up of results, are available in the Master's Thesis  of
Kap Kyun Kim (40).  It is apparent from  Table XXIV that silica gel  is
superior as  a selective adsorbent to any of the molecular sieves tested.
This is shown by the larger volume of terpenes which can be passed
through the  column before the appearance of the sulfur compound (at 5%
                                70

-------
of its influent concentration).   An additional  indication  of  superiority
is the shorter break-through zone height for silica  gel.

                           TABLE XXIV
                Summary of Break-Through Data for
    Selective Adsorption of Dimethyl  Disulfide from  Terpenes
^Adsorbent
Molecular
Sieve 5A
Molecular
Sieve IDA
if
it
Mo lecul ar
Sieve 1 3X
Si lica Gel
ii
it
it
ti
Pore
o
Radius A
5

8

8
8
10
10
15-100
1 5- 1 00
1 5- 1 00
1 5- 1 00
1 5- 1 00
Mole. %
(CH3)2S2
in Terpene
20

5

20
20
20
20
20
20
20
30
30
Flow Rate ml. to Breakthrough Zone
2
g./cm hr 5% 95% Ht., cm
85

35

35
85
35
85
35
85
170
85
170
0

2.5

1.0
0.7
0.3
0.3
20.0
17.0
15.0
13.2
13.1
1

5

3
5
3
4
25
24
24
16
16.5
___

50

80
1 10
105
130
18
30
45
15
17
* Adsorption column:  glass, 0.64 cm x 90 cm, filled with crushed
  (24-200 mesh) molecular sieve (20 grams) or with 28-200 mesh silica
  gel (22 grams).  All experiments conducted at room temperature (72°F).
Appraisal of Approaches
For only moderate contamination of the turpentine fraction by sulfur
compounds and methanol, the "brute force" method of chemical  destruction
by oxidation of the impurities followed by water washing would appear to
be still preferable to the methods explored here.  For higher concentra-
tions of contaminants, selective adsorption would appear to offer more
promise than solvent extraction and also more than fractional distilla-
tion unless a-pinene  is the only major constituent to be recovered by
distiIlation.
                                71

-------
For selective adsorption the higher cost of molecular sieves, together
with the frequency of regeneration required (because of early break-
through of solute) suggests that economic feasibility for this adsorbent
is unlikely in this application.  There may be some possibility of a
feasible process based upon silica gel, however.  For example, utilizing
the data for silica gel  adsorbent, and a 20% methyl sulfide 8Q% terpene
                                                 2
feed mixture flowing at 170 grams per hour per cm  o-f column cross
section, 15 ml. of effluent is collected before break-through occurs.
This is equivalent to the purification of about 1000 gallons of SEKOR
oil charged over a period of six hours to a gel-packed column of 2-ft
diam. x 10 ft height, before regeneration is required.  This would
represent the oil production of a large Kraft mill.
Regeneration of the adsorbent was conducted in the  laboratory study
utilizing methanol to elute the dimethyl disulfide  (as well as the
retained terpenes).  This polar material was found to be highly
effective in displacing the dimethyl disulfide, with the concentration
of the  latter in the silica gel column effluent falling from 65 mole
per cent to less than I  mole per cent.  Although methanol  is not the
only possible eluent (heating, steam, air or water  may be  used) it is
of interest because  it does not introduce a new air contamination
problem, is a possible by-product of the SEKOR process, and can be
separated from the eluted methyl sulfides by distillation.  Alternatively,
a continuous industrial  process (moving bed or multi-feed  column) may
be visualized, though it is probable that for the application to steam
stripping the batch cyclic process would be simpler and more promising.
                                72

-------
                          SECTION VIII
                        ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The financial  support of this Investigation by the Environmental
Protection Agency Office of Research  Monitoring is gratefully
acknowledged.
During the course of this study useful  discussions were held with a
number of people, these included Professor K.V. Sarkanen,  Dr. Josef
Gratzl, Dr. Wolfgang Glasser and Dr.  Kaj Forss of the University of
Washington as well as John Van Vessen and James Leonard of the
Weyerhaeuser Company.  Collaborators  on the project who have given
invaluable assistance to the Investigation were Ms. Juanita Collins,
H.R. Monahan, J.T. Ruggeri, Kap Kim and Donald Wilson.
Assistance of the member mi I Is of the Northwest Pulp and Paper
Association is also acknowledged.
                               73

-------
                          SECTION IX

                          REFERENCES

 I.  Hrutfiord, B.F. and McCarthy, J.L., "SEKOR I:  Volatile Organic
    Compounds in Kraft Pulp Mill Effluent Streams."  Tappi  5Q, No. 2,
    82-85 (1967).

 2.  Bethge, 0., and Ehrenborg,  L., "Identification of Volatile Com-
    pounds  in Kraft Mill Emissions."  Svensk Papperstid., 22, 347-350
    (1967).

 3.  Wilson, D.F. and Hrutfiord, B.F., "SEKOR IV.  Formation of Volatile
    Organic Compounds  in the  Kraft Pulping Process."  Tappi 54, No.  7,
    1094-1098,  (1971).

 4.  Marvel I, E.E.  and Wiman,  R.E., "4-(p-TolyI)-l-pentanol  in Douglas
    Fir Pulping Products."  J.  Org. Chem., 28_,  1542-1545 (1963).

 5.  Leonard, J., Weyerhaeuser Company,  personal  communication.

 6.  Cabauatan,  E.Q., "Monoterpenes  in Douglas  Fir Needle Oil, Wood
    Turpentine  and Crude Sulfate Turpentine."  M.S.  Thesis, University
    of Washington  (1969).

 7.  Sarkanen, K.V., Hrutfiord,  B.F., Johanson,  L.N.,  and Gardner, H.S.,
    Kraft Odor," Tappi,  53_, No.  5,  766-783  (1970).

 8.  Ruus,  L., "Study on  Pulp  Mill Effluent."   Svensk Papperstid.,  \9_
    751-755 (1964).

 9.  Turner, B.G. and van Horn,  J.T., Southeastern Section  TAPPI
    Meeting,  March,  1969.

10.  Seppovaara, 0. and Hynninan,  D., "On  the Toxicity of Sulfate-Mi II
    Condensates."   Paperi  Ja  Puu, J_,  11-23  (1970).

II.  McDermott,  G.N., Tech.  Bull.  No_. 72_,  NCASi,  November 1954,  revised,
     1970.

12.  Wilson, D.F.,  Johanson,  L.N.,  and  Hrutfiord, B.F.,  "Methanol,
     Ethanol  and Acetone in Kraft Pulp  Mil I  Condensate Streams," Tappi,
    j>5,  No. 8,  1244-1246 (1972).

13.   Cade,  S.C., Hrutfiord, B.F.,  and Gara,  R.I., "Identification of the
     Primary Attractant for Gnathotrichus  Sulcatus Isolated from Western
     Hemlock Logs."  J_. Econ.  Entom.,  63,  1014-15 (1970).

14.   Clayton,  D.,  "The  Alkaline Degradation of Some Hardwood 4-o-Methyl-
     D-Glucuronoxylans."  Svensk Papperstid.,  4,  115-124 (1963).

                                75

-------
 15.  Hrutfiord, B.F.  and Wilson,  D.F.,  "Turpentine  Concentrations  in
     Kraft  Mill Condensate Streams."  MMS  in  EPA  review,  August  (1972).

 16.  Ores,  J., Russell, J., and Bajak,  H.W.,  Sulfate Turpentine  Re-
     covery.  Pulp Chemicals Association,  New York   (1971).

 17.  Liu, L.Y., "Turpentine Collected from Continuous Digester."
     Pulp and Paper  Int.,  12, No. 3, 55-57 (1970)
 18.   Graham,  K., "Anaerobic  Induction of Primary Chemical Attractancy
      for  Ambrosia Beetles."  Can. J_. Zoo I., 46, 905-908  (1968).

 19.   Wasserman, A.E., "Organoleptic Evaluation of Three  Phenols Present
      in Wood  Smoke."  J_. Food Sci., 31,  1005-1010 (1966),

 20.   Leonardos, G., Kendall, D., and Barnard, N., "Odor  Threshold
      Determinations of 53 Odorant Chemicals."  J. Air Poll. Control
      Assoc.,  ]9, 91-95 (1969).

 21.   Sarkanen, K.V., "The Chemistry of Delignification in Pulp Bleaching."
      Pure and Applied Chemistry, 5_, 221-233 (1962).

 22.   Das, B.S., Reid, S.G., Betts, J.L., and Patrick, K., J. Fisheries
      Res. Board Can., 26, 3055-2067 (1969).               ~

 23.   Shin, T.T.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., Sarkanen, K.V. and Johanson, L.N.,
      "Methyl  Mercaptan Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium in Aqueous  Systems as a
      Function of Temperature and pH."  Tapp!, 50, No. 12, 634-638 (1967).

 24.   Matteson, M.J., Johanson, L.N., and McCarthy, J.L., "Steam
      Stripping of Volatile Organic Substances from Kraft Pulp Mill
      Effluent Streams."  Tappi, 5£, No. 2, 86-91  (1967).

 25.   Maahs, H.G., Johanson, L.N., and McCarthy, J.L., "SEKOR III.  Pre-
      liminary Engineering Design and Cost Estimates for Steam Stripping
      Kraft Pulp Mill Effluents."  Tappi, 50_, No.  6, 270-275 (1967).

 26.   Shih, T.T.C., Hrutfiord, B.F., Sarkanen, K.V., and Johanson, L.N.,
      "Hydrogen Sulfide Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium in Aqueous  Systems as a
      Function of Temperature and pH."  Tappi, 50_, No. 12, 630-634 (1967).

 27.   Tsuchiya, G.S. and Johanson, L.N., "Prediction of Generation and
      Release of Odorous Gases from Kraft Pulp Mills."  Tappi, 55, No. 5,
      777-783  (1972).                                   ~~

28.  Hubbe> P.O., "Digester Problem Statement," Tappi, 49, No. 5, 6IA-
      69A (1966).                                        ""


                                76

-------
29.  Wetherhorn, D., "The Calculation of Evaporator Heat Balances from
     Operating Data."  Tappl, 47_, No. 2, I68A-I7IA (1964).

30.  Libby, C. Earl (Ed.), Pulp and Paper Science and Technology, Vol. j_.
     McGraw HIM, New York, (1962).

31.  Drew, J. and Plyant, G.D., Jr., "Turpentine from the Pulpwoods of
     the United States and Canada."  Tappl, 49_, No. 10, 430-438 (1966).

32.  Bennett, C.O. and Meyers, J.E., "Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer."
     McGraw-Hill, New York (1962) p. 531.

33.  Treybal, R.E., "Mass Transfer Operations, 2nd Ed.," McGraw-Hill
     New York (1968) p. 252.

34.  Chu, J.C., "Distillation Equilibrium Data."  Reinhold Publishing
     Corp., New York, New York (1950).

35.  Perry, J. "Chemical Engineers Handbook, 4th Ed." McGraw-Hill,
     New York (1963) p.  13-20.

36.  Tsuchiya, G., "The Generation and  Loss of Volatile Constituents  in
     the Kraft Pulping Process."  M.S.  Thesis, University of Washington
     (1970).

37.  Ruggeri, R.T., "Phase Equilibrium  of  Kraft Mill Effluent Streams."
     M.S. Thesis,  University  of  Washington  (1971).

38.  Renon, H.  and Prausnitz,  J.M.,  "Local  Compositions  in Thermodynamic
     Excess  Functions  for  Liquid Mixtures."  AlChE Journal, j_4,  135-
     144  (1968).

39.  Broughton,  D.B.,  "Molex:  Case  History of a Process."  Chem.  Eng.
     Prog.,  64_,  No. 8,  60-65 (1968).

40.  Kim,  K.K.,  "Separation  of Methyl Sulfides  from  Terpenes of  Kraft
     Pulp  Mill  Condensate Streams  by Adsorption."  M.S.  Thesis,  Univer-
     sity  of  Washington (1969).
                                 77

-------
                            SECTION X

                    PUBLICATIONS AND PATENTS


The following publications have been produced or are anticipated to be

produced as a result of this project:

     SEKOR IV.   Formation of Volatile Organic Compounds in Kraft
                 Pulping Process.  Wilson, D.F. and Hrutfiord, B.F.,
                 Tappi, _54_, No. 7,  1094-1098, (1971).

     SEKOR V.    Methanol, Ethanol  and Acetone in Kraft Pulp Mill
                 Condensate Streams.  Wilson, D.F., Hrutfiord, B.F.,
                 Johanson, L.N., Tappi, 55, No. 8, 1244-1246 (1972)

     SEKOR VI.   Turpentine Concentrations in Kraft Mill Condensate
                 Streams.  Hrutfiord, B.F., and Wilson, D.F.  Accepted
                 for publication In Pulp and Paper Magazine of Canada
                 (1973).
     Thesis      Wilson, D.F., "VoI atile Organic Compounds in Kraft
                 Pulping."  M.S. Thesis, University of Washington,
                 (1970).

     Thesis      Rugger!, R.T., "Phase Equilibrium of Kraft Mill
                 Effluent Streams."  M.S. Thesis, University of
                 Washington (1971).

     Thesis      Kim, K.K., "Separation of Methyl Sulfides from
                 Terpenes of Kraft Pulp Mill Condensate Streams by
                 Adsorption."  M.S.  Thesis, University of Washington,
                 (1969).

It appears that no patentable developments have arisen from the present

study.
                                79

-------
                          SECTION XI
                           GLOSSARY
 I.  Black Liquor — Spent pulping chemicals and dissolved wood
        components  resulting  from kraft  pulping.
 2.  Blow Gas Condensate — Condensed steam resulting  from discharging
        digester contents at  high temperature.
 3.  Condensate —  General term  for  liquid resulting from condensing
        steam etc.  to water and  organic  liquids.
 4.  Crude Sulfate  Turpentine — Mixture of terpenes and sulfur
        compounds  isolated from  kraft digester.
 5.  Digester Relief Condensate  — Condensate  from condensing vented
        steam and  relief gas  from kraft  digesters.
 6.  Evaporators — Units which  concentrate black  liquor, giving
        evaporator  condensate as one product.
 7.  Kraft Pulping  — Delignification of wood  with sodium hydroxide
        and  sodium  sulfide.
 8.  Liquid  to Gas  Ratio --  (L/G) The ratio on a weight basis of the
        liquid being stripped in a  column to  the gas  (steam)  used for
        stri pping.
 9.  SEKOR — Stripping Effluent for j
-------
  SELECTED WA TER                       i. Report NO.
  RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
  INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
               2.        3. Accession No.
                        w
  4.  Title  steam Stripping  Odorous Substances From                  J- Report Date
          Kraft Effluent Streams (SEKOR)                           6.
   7.  Authors) Bjopn  F> Hrutfiord,  Lennart N. Johanson
             Joseph L.  McCarthy
   9.  Organization
             University  of  Washington
             Seattle, Washington
                        8. Performing Organization
                          Report No.

                        10. Project No.

                          12040 EXQ
                       11.  Contract I Grant No.
                                                                   13. Type of Report and
                                                                      Period Covered
  12. Sponsoring Organization

  15. Supplementary Notes

           Environmental Protection Agency report
           number, EPA-R2-73-196,  April 1973.
  16. Abstract
      Laboratory and  design studies have been completed relating to volatile
 constituents which appear In Kraft black  liquor  and  condensate streams,  and how these
 can best be removed  and  recovered.  In order of  decreasing concentration,  the
 volatile constituents  are alcohols, terpenes,  ketones, sulfur bearing compounds, and
 phenolic compounds.  Methanol, the major  alcohol  contaminant, Is found  in  from 280 to
 8400 ppm in condensate streams, amounting to  I I  to 16 pounds per ton of  pulp produced.
 Terpenes are found to  range from a few ppm to  about  4500 ppm in condensates, 4 to 9
 pounds per ton of pulp.   Acetone is present at concentrations of 2 to 200  ppm,
 corresponding to 0.07  to 0.4 pounds per ton of pulp.   In all, some 40 compounds were
 found to be present  in condensate streams.  The  feasibility of combining steam
 stripping of Kraft  liquor with steam stripping of condensates was explored, and the
 conditions under which this may be warranted are reported.  Under most  present mill
 situations, steam stripping of black liquor and  the  last stages of evaporator
 condensates does not appear to be warranted except in unusual cases.  Exploratory
 type studies were made and are reported concerning Improved methods of  predicting
 vapor-liquid equilibria  In such systems,  and separation of the resulting volatile oils.
  I7a. Descriptors
      Steam Stripping,  Pulp Condensates, Pollution Abatement, Water Reuse,  Volatiles
 Recovery, Black  Liquor,  Odor Control.
  17b. Identifiers

      Terpenes, SuI fur Compounds, Methyl Mercaptan,  Methanol, Turpentine.
  lie. COWRR Field A Group
  It. Availability             19. Security Class.
                             (Report)

                          20. Security Class.
 L.N. Johanson               (P*ge)
21. No. of     Send To:
   Pages
22. Price     WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
            US, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
            WASHINGTON. D. C 20240
  Abstractor                             Institution
WRSICI02(REV JUNE 1971)                                                                Sp0 ,|3-j,g(

-------