United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
              Environmental Research
              Laboratory
              Corvallis OR 97330
EPA-600/3-79-071
June 1979
             Research and Development
&EPA
Effects of Selected
Herbicides on
Smolting of
Coho Salmon

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and  application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping  was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series  are:

      1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological  Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans, plant and animal spe-
cies, and materials. Problems are assessed for their long- and short-term  influ-
ences. Investigations include formation, transport, and pathway studies to deter-
mine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides  the technical basis
for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the
aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                            EPA-600/3-79-071
                                            June 1979
EFFECTS OF SELECTED HERBICIDES ON SMOLTING OF COHO SALMON
                           by

                     Harold W.  Lorz
                     Susan W.  Glenn
                   Ronald H.  Williams
                     Clair M.  Kunkel
            Research and Development  Section
         Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

                           and

                     Logan A.  Morris
                     Bobby R.  Loper
  Pacific Northwest Forest and  Range  Experiment Station
                 Corvallis, Oregon 97331
                     Grant  #R-80'»283
                     Project Officer

                     Gary A.  Chapman
             Western Fish Toxicology Station
       Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory
                 Corvallis,  Oregon 97330
       CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
           OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
          U.  S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                 CORVALLIS,  OREGON 97330

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER

     This report has been reviewed by the Corvallis Environmental  Research
Laboratory, U. S. Environmental  Protection Agency,  and approved for publi-
cation.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names of commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                                         U

-------
                                  FOREWORD

     Effective regulatory and enforcement actions by the Environmental
Protection Agency would be virtually impossible without sound scientific
data on pollutants and their impact on environmental stability and human
health. Responsibility for building this data base has been assigned to
EPA's Office of Research and Development and its 15 major field installa-
tions, one of which is in the Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory
(CERL).

     The primary mission of the Corvallis Laboratory is research on the
effects of environmental pollutants on terrestrial, freshwater, and marine
ecosystems; the behavior, effects and control of pollutants in lake systems;
and the development of predictive models on the movement of pollutants  in
the biosphere.

     This report describes a potentially adverse effect of pollutants on
fish such as salmon which must migrate from freshwater to seawater, and
demonstrates that under certain conditions exposure to sublethal levels of
pollutants can result in mortality when fish subsequently enter seawater.
Laboratory test methods are described which should detect this effect in
screening tests and the data obtained in this report should advance
knowledge on the effects of pollutants in aquatic ecosystems.


                                             J. C. McCarty
                                             Acting Director, CERL
                                     !» •
                                     i i

-------
                               ABSTRACT
n,       I   «    T        SeVeral herbic±de* ^ yearling coho salmon,
Oncorhynchus kisutch, were determined.   All 96-h tests were conducted
under static conditions at 10°C in freshwater of alkalinity and hardness
ranging from 70-83 mg/L and 85-93 mg/L (as CaC03) . respectively.  The
herbicides acroleln and dinoseb were the most toxic of the 12 water
soluble herbicides tested, having 96-h LC50 values of 68 Ld 100 ug/L,
respectively   Atrazine, diquat and picloram were moderately toxic in
freshwater with 96-h LC50 values ranging from 10-30 mg/L

exhibited Z°SHd to.ABltr°lc-^ di1"at and paraquat in freshwater all
exhibited dose-dependent effects in subsequent seawater entry tests   The

        ^^
     werechall^r061    ttle °r "' *»— »t     r       w
     were challenged with seawater.   No apparent affects on the (Na K)-

                  a"1Vlty °£ the 8111S ~» «*««- "ith^o^f
     The effect of sublethal concentrations of Tordon 101,  dinoseb and
                                  "   -

January 5, 1977 to June 30,  1978
                                                                        a
                                                 Deport covers the period
                                    IV

-------
                               CONTENTS

                                                                Page

DISCLAIMER	   ii
FOREWORD	  i ii
ABSTRACT	   i v
FI CURES	  vi i
TABLES	 vi i i
APPEND IX TABLES	    x
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS	   xi

       I   CONCLUSIONS	    1
      II   RECOMMENDATIONS	    2
     III   INTRODUCTION	    3
      IV  METHODS	    6
               SELECTION OF TOXICANTS AND EXPERIMENTS	    6
               EXPERIMENTAL FISH	    6
               EXPOSURE TO TOXICANTS	    7
                    Toxicants	    7
                    Static exposure tests	    7
                    Flow-through tests	    7
               WATER QUALITY	   10
               CHEMICAL ANALYSIS	   11
               GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY	   11
               TOLERANCE TO SEAWATER	   11
               ASSESSMENT OF COEFFICIENT OF CONDITION	   13
               HISTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION	   13
               DOWNSTREAM MIGRATION	   13
       V  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION	   15
               ACROLEIN	   15
                    Review of Literature	   15
                    Experimental  Results	   17
               AMITROLE-T	   19
                    Review of Literature	   19
                    Experimental  Results	   20
               ATRAZINE	   22
                    Review of Literature	   22
                    Experimental  Results	   2k
               DICAMBA	   25
                    Review of Literature	   25
                    Experimental  Results	   25
               KRENITE	   26
                    Review of Literature	   26
                    Exper i menta1  Res u 11s	   27

-------
                                                            Page
PARAQUAT
     Rev
     Experimental Results
                Review of Literature                  .....  27
                                                     ......
                Review of Literature .......................  3 1
                Experimental Results .........         .....  •}•>
           2 L q^T        '       ~ --            ...........
           Z>H»5 ' .........................................  ^l,
                Review of Literature ................... [ * ' "  31,
                Experimental Results ......        .........  -jr
           ESTERON BRUSH KILLER ............... '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'."  36
                Review of Literature .......... !!!!!!!!"!!!  36
                Experimental Results .....       ...........  -JQ
           TORDON 22 K (PICLORAM) . . . ....... \\\ [ '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. '.'.'.  4o
                Review of Literature ............. .......'...  l\Q
                Experimental Results .......       .........  i.7
           TORDON 101 ............... ........ ['" ...........  ?^
                Review of Literature ....... '.'.'. .............  45
                Experimental Results ........... ! !!'.!!!!!!!!  ^6
                     Static exposure .................... '*  ^
                     Flow-through exposure ......        ""  L.R
           DINOSEB (PREMERGE) ....... . ............ .'.'.'.'.'.'.'."  H
                Review of Literature ............ ........     ^9
                Experimental Results ............ '.'.'.'.'. ......  51
                     Static exposure ..................... ]"  ci
                     Flow-through exposure ......         '"  ct
           DIQUAT ................... . ......... ^ ...........  53
                Review of Literature ........ .......'.. ......  $L
                Experimental Results ....... >..............'  53
                     Static exposure ........            "**  CQ
  V!  GENERAL D
 VII  REFERENCES
VIII  ADDITIONAL REFERENCES NOT'ciTED ......................
  IX  APPENDICIES ...... . .....        ......................  78
           APPENDIX I.  METHuDOLOGY'FOR'ANALYsis'oF ........
                        SPECIFIC HERBICIDES ____              Qi
           APPENDIX II. EFFECT OF VARIOUS HERBI ciDEs'oi''' "
                        HISTOLOGY OF YEARLING COHO SALMON
                        BY DR. J. D. HENDRICKS, OREGON
                        STATE UNIVERSITY .....                qo
           APPENDIX III.  METR.C AND ENGLISH EO,uivALENTS: '. \ '.  9°

-------
                               FIGURES

Number                                                           Page

  1   Diagram of flow-through diluter ............................    9

  2   Exposure tanks with diluter in background ..................   10

  3   Percent survival  of yearling coho salmon during exposure to
     acrolein in freshwater and subsequent survival  upon transfer
     to seawater ................................................   19

  ^4   Percent survival  of yearling coho salmon during exposure
     to Amitrole-T in' freshwater and subsequent  survival upon
     transfer to seawater .......................................   22

  5   Percent survival  of yearling coho salmon during exposure
     to paraquat-CL in freshwater and subsequent survival  upon
     transfer to seawater .......................................   30

  6   Percent survival  of yearling coho salmon during exposure
     to Tordon 22K (picloram)  in freshwater and  subsequent
     survival  upon transfer to seawater .........................   M
  7  Percent survival  of yearling  coho salmon  during  exposure
     to Tordon 101  (2,4-D + picloram)  in  freshwater and
     subsequent survival  upon  transfer to seawater ..............   l\~J

  8  Percent downstream migration  of yearling  coho  salmon
     fol lowing exposure to Tordon  101 .................. .........   50

  9  Percent survival  of yearling  coho salmon  during
     exposure to dinoseb (Dow  Premerge)  in freshwater and
     subsequent survival  upon  transfer to seawater ..............   52

 10  Percent downstream migration  of yearling  coho  salmon
     following exposure to dinoseb (Dow Premerge) ............... .   55

 11   Percent survival  of yearling  coho salmon  during  exposure
     to diquat in freshwater and subsequent  survival  upon
     transfer to seawater ......................................   59

 12  Percent downstream migration  of yearling  coho  salmon
     following exposure to diquat .............................. .  61
                                   VI I

-------
                                  TABLES

Number                                                           „
	                                                           Page

  1   HERBICIDES TESTED FOR ACUTE TOX1CITY TO YEARLING COHO
     SALMON	                     8

  2  CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TEST WATER DURING STATIC
     TOXICANT EXPOSURE,	             ]2

  3  ACUTE TOXICITY OF ACROLEIN TO VARIOUS FISH SPECIES	 16

  A  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY OF YEARLING COHO SALMON
     EXPOSED TO ACROLEIN IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT
     SURVIVAL FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER  (MAY 10-27, 1977)..  18

  5  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
     TO AMITROLE-T IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIv"
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (JAN. 17-FEB  16  1977)       21
  6  TRAZ.N.ppu     F YEARUNG COH° SALMON
     TO ATRAZINE IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (MAR. 2-19  1977) '
7
  8
     Tn*n!!!AL AN° G'LL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
                                                  »
               	 34
  11  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASF OF vcam mr rni,n CAI U_M
                                      .ING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
                                                                   35

-------
Number

 12  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED TO  ESTERON
     BRUSH KILLER AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING  TRANSFER
     TO SEAWATER (MAY 31 -JUNE 16,  1977) .........................  38

 13  SURVIVAL OF BIG CREEK WINTER STEELHEAD  TROUT FRY  EXPOSED
     TO ESTERON BRUSH KILLER, FAIRPLAY LABORATORY, OSU
     (May  31-June 4,  1977) ......................................  39

 14  MORTALITY DATA FOR SEVERAL FISH  SPECIES EXPOSED TO
     TORDON 22K FOR % HOURS ....................................  42

 15  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
     TO TORDON 22K IN FRESHWATER AND  SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (DEC.  9'27, 1976) ...........  43

 16  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING COHO SALMON AT  THREE FISH  DENSITIES
     EXPOSED TO TORDON 22K OR TORDON  22K  PLUS AMMONIUM
     CHLORIDE IN FRESHWATER, AND THE  SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (FEB.  11-28,  1977) ..........  45

 17  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
     TO TORDON 101  IN FRESHWATER AND  THE  SUBSEQUENT  SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (NOV.  30-DEC.  21,  1976) .....  46
 18  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING  COHO SALMON  EXPOSED  TO TORDON  101
     IN FRESHWATER,  AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING
     TRANSFER TO SEAWATER  (MAR.  13'29, 1977) .......... - .........  48

 19  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE  OF YEARLING  COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
     TO DINOSEB IN FRESHWATER  AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (FEB.  22-MAR.  10,  1977) .....  52

 20  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING  COHO SALMON  EXPOSED  TO DINOSEB  IN
     FRESHWATER AND  SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING  TRANSFER
     TO SEAWATER (APR. 19-MAY  16, 1977) ....... ..................  53

 21  ACUTE TOXICITY  OF DIQUAT  TO VARIOUS FISH  SPECIES ...........  56

 22  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE  OF YEARLING  COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
     TO DIQUAT IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (APR.  ig-MAY 5,  1977) .......  59

 23  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE  OF YEARLING  COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
     TO DIQUAT IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
     FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER .............................  60
                                  IX

-------
                         APPENDIX TABLES

Number
  5
                                                        Pae
  1  CONCENTRATIONS OF 2,4-D AND 2,/»,5-T IN STEELHEAD TROUT FRY
    FOLLOWING  EXPOSURE TO ESTERON BRUSH KILLER     ..!...  95

  2  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY OF YEARLING COHO  SALMON

    =N?TsR'?; ;----ER.AND.S-ST".---..  96

  3  EFFECT OF  TORDON 101 EXPOSURE ON AVERAGE LENGTH  UFITHT
    AND CONDITION FACTOR            u^Hbt LtlNblH, WEIGHT,
                                                         „
  6  CONCENTRATION OF DINOSEB IN VARIOUS TISSIIFS nr VCAD, ,MP
                                         - ™
                                                         100
  7  C^.SS S EXP°SURE °N AVEME LE^H, WE.GHT, AND
                  .............................................  101
  8  pEM                                COH°
    CH*ON,C EXPOSURE

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     This investigation was supported in part by the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Grant R-80A283, and was funded through the
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.  The U.
S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experi-
ment Station, accepted responsibility for chemical analyses of the herbicides
tested and provided the necessary personnel and equipment.  Many con-
tributed to this study and their assistance is gratefully acknowledged:
Dr. G. A. Chapman, Project officer, Western Fish Toxicology Station
(WFTS), EPA, provided technical assistance and guidance.  Dr. N. A.
Hartmann devised the statistical test to determine if downstream movement
of the treatment groups was statistically different from the control.
Dr. M. Newton, Oregon State University School  of Forestry, provided one
of the chemicals, Krenite, used in the study.   Ms. Carroll Burkett,
Forest Science Laboratory, assisted in the chemical analyses.

     The authors gratefully acknowledge Drs. G. A. Chapman, A. V. Nebeker
and H. H. Wagner who provided constructive criticism on the manuscript.
                                      xi

-------
                                  SECTION I
                                 CONCLUSIONS

 1.   Acrolein  and  dinoseb  were  the  most  toxic  of  the  herbicides  tested
     having  96-h LC50  values  of 68  and  100  yg/L,  respectively.

 2.   Atrazine,  diquat  and  picloram  were  moderately  toxic  in  freshwater
     with  96-h  LC50  values ranging  from  10-30  mg/L.

 3.   Fish  exposed  to Amitrole-T,  diquat, and paraquat  in  freshwater exhibited
     dose-dependent  effects  in  subsequent seawater  entry  tests.

 **.   Freshwater exposure to sublethal concentrations of diquat  (5 mg/L for
     1A*» h)  resulted in some  deaths when fish were  challenged with seawater.
     Diquat  exposures  of 0.5-3.0  mg/L for 96 h resulted in reduced downstream
     migration  following release  of fish into a natural stream.

 5.   No apparent effects on the  (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of the
     gills were observed with any of the herbicides tested.

 6.   The herbicide formulations tested appeared to  have no effect on
     smelting of yearling  coho salmon except for the direct  toxicity of
     acrolein and dinoseb, and the effect of diquat on seawater survival
     and downstream  migration.  Therefore, application of these formulations
     at their recommended  levels of use  (Oregon Weed Control  Handbook,
     1977) should not  affect smelting.

 7.  Misuse of chemicals has  led  to direct loss of fish, and this suggests
     that stricter enforcement of regulations and the possible need for
     training and refinement  in licensing of applicators is  required.

8.  The data indicate that some bioconcentration from the water occurred
     in the fish exposed to dinoseb and Esteron;  however,  it  is low
    compared to pesticides (e.g.  DDT).

9.  Some of the chemicals tested produced pronounced  histopathological
    effects in exposed fish;  the tissue effects  were  similar to those
    produced by toxic agents.

-------
                                SECTION I I







                              RECOMMENDATIONS
                                                  "  and
2-                               t
    periods.        herb,c,des that pers.st in the environment for extended

-------
                                 SECTION I I I
                                INTRODUCTION

      Herbicides  have become a  widely used  and  nearly  indispensable  tool  in
 reducing the competition of brushy hardwoods  in  intensive  silviculture of
 Douglas-fir in  the Pacific Northwest.   As  Norris  (1971)  pointed  out,
 however, it is  necessary to know the behavior  of  these  chemicals  to allow
 their safe use,  particularly with respect  to water  contamination.

      Herbicides  can enter streams through  direct  application  to  stream
 surfaces,  in overland  flow during periods  of  intense  precipitation  or by
 leaching through the soil  profile.   The probability of overland  flow or
 leaching of an  herbicide to streams  depends largely on  the  persistence and
 movement characteristics of the  chemical,  properties  of  the soil, and the
 degree  to  which  precipitation  infiltrates  the  soil  surface.   Leaching is a
 slow  process capable of  moving only  small  quantities  of  chemical  short
 distances.   Overland flow of water  (and herbicide) on forest  land seldom
 occurs  because  the infiltration  characteristics of  the  forest floor and
 soil  greatly exceed rates  of precipitation  (Norris and Moore  1971).
 Norris  (1967) reported that  direct application of chemicals to stream
 surfaces is  the  principal  mechanism  of  chemical entry to aquatic  systems.
 This  type  of contamination  can be prevented or minimized through  the use
 of buffer  strips  and attention to the details of application.

      The opportunities for  entry  of  herbicides from agricultural  lands to
 streams  are  similar to those from the forest except where herbicides are
 used  to  control  aquatic  or  streambank vegetation.  Many  forest and agri-
 cultural herbicides  are  applied  in the  early spring and summer months when
 anadromous  salmonids are  normally migrating downstream.   A  careful evalua-
 tion  of  the  possible toxic  hazards of herbicides to aquatic life  is
 therefore  necessary  to insure that use  of these valuable tools does not
 cause toxic  impacts  on aquatic organisms.

      Evaluation of  the probability of occurrence of toxic impacts on
 aquatic  organisms  requires a consideration of two factors.   One is the
 inherent toxic properties of the chemical involved, and  the second Is the
 probability  that the organisms will be exposed to toxic  amounts or concen-
 trations of  this chemical.  The probability of exposure  is  related to both
 temporal and spatial relationships between aquatic organisms,  treated
areas, application of herbicides and the behavior of the chemical in the
environment.  Behavior of chemicals  in the environment includes their
movement, persistence, and fate within the aerial, terrestrial,  and  aquatic
portions of  the environment.  Of primary importance is the  mechanism of
chemical entry to streams.

-------
     Concern regarding  the  protection of  surface waters  and  aquatic life
has prompted numerous evaluations  of  the  effects of  chemicals  on  aquatic
invertebrates and fishes.   Much  of the  toxicological  research  with aquatic
biota has,  however,  been  limited to the development  of acute toxicity
values to measure the effects  of the  chemicals  on  these  organisms.  More
recently, chronic exposure  of  fish and  aquatic  organisms has received
attention because numerous  parameters can be  evaluated as indices of toxic
?Q7?CtS i MthUI" !9I2< Eat°n 197°'  Macek et al"  ]976a,  b, HcKIm and Benoit
1971, and Mount 1968)    The "laboratory fish  production  index" as defined
by Mount and Stephen (1967) reflects  toxic effects on  reproduction, growth,
spawn, ng^behay. or  egg  hatchability and fry survival.  A parameter which
has rece.ved l.ttle attention  is the  effect of  chemicals on  seaward
m.gration and saltwater adaptation of anadromous species.
normJl! „*"* ^ H™ • rat ' ?" °f J uven ' ] e c°ho salmon  (Oncorhynchus kisutch)
normally occurs dunng the spring of  their second year of life.   They are
fully euryhal me several  months  earlier (Conte et al .  1966  Otto 1971)
transfer ofTv'V^?^.3 ^Md size of 9 cm.   The 'experimental
a transient hT"  I S.aV?°nids fr™ freshwater to seawater Is followed by
1con?e et al  iq?r  M ,  StUrbanCe °f plasma water-electrolyte balance
caused by the Ih^i  1      ?ndSmith 1%8)'  This Osmotic disturbance is
osmorequlation  (H ?  9!C  -Chan9eS necessarY to adapt from freshwater
^ alt "xcreHon  wl /   ?tl0"'  ?ater excr«tlon) to seawater osmoregulat ion
the time of no™?     re^nt,on).  These disturbances are minimized at
      ! b)              ^ migratlon  °r "Parr-smolt transformation"  (Wagner
physloloqICaTdfac?orsr ^  'T^  data  Bowing  that  one  of  the
frou t (sTl™ alTr*   ^   ^^  Wlth m|9r«ory  behavior  in steelhead
tHpnosTha'sH^se   ^              °f (Na.K)-st.fflulated adenos
                        ^^l^^ °f (Na.K)-st.fflulated adenosine
activity doubled dur ng ?he parr- s^U%miCr;SOmeS °f 9niS'  ™S *"**"*
steelhead trout  (Zaugg and McLa n iqin t^f°rm5tl°n °f coh° salmon and
ATPase activity  n salmnnlH,        7 '  972' and Zaug9 and Wa9ner '973).
reaching a maximum  ? " eto^^l "T^ ^^ SeaWater eXP°SUre'
factor  in maintain!™ ! iZ  r   J    ys> and  IS th°ught to be an  important
al   1^67  Zauaa and M   •   of?'1' and ionic) balance in flsh (Epstein et
sublethai fevels of rn      -^l  L°rZ a^d McPherson (1977) showed that
Several workers have r^6",1^-1^ the (Na 'K) "Stimulated ATPase activity.
hyd^carbon  insectlriH P°  !   !" Vltr°" inhibition of ATPase by chlorinated
      M                                                (Campbell et al.
 hydrocarbonTnsecH"^  ^erb' ^CUrrer 3nd persist— <* chlorinated
 has  resulted  "n^^rev? ewi" ?l£ f f^ of ^  '" ^ """"
 aquatic  ecosystems  (Cope  1966  Eisler  1Q7^  I- ?        chem.cals on
 1968,  and  Mullison  970).  Our ear Her r    ElJ1?r,J?nd WaPner ]™> JohnS°n
 mixtures of cadmium or  z  nc with loiSI rSSearf  "?di"ted that  copper  and
 coho salmon  (Lorz and McPherson  lS??P  i      detri^ntal to  smolting  in
 studies  reported here   w, !    - 9??>  L°rZ et a1' ]W .  Therefore  in the
 herbicide;Pused exten^::!:6^ iorLT^ 1" ^rml^ "  »« of  the
 effects  on smolting           forestry and agriculture would have similar

-------
      This report presents data on the effects of selected herbicides on
 survival, seawater adaptability, (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase levels, and
 downstream migration of yearling coho salmon following acute and chronic
 herbicide exposure.  The report includes a detailed description of
 methods, a results and discussion section arranged on a compound by
 compound basis, and a series of appendices.   The results and discussion
 section includes reviews of pertinent literature relevant to toxicity
 characteristics, and the environmental  behavior of each compound at
 recommended application rates.—/
I/Application rates from Oregon Weed Control Handbook 1977 unless otherwise
  noted.

-------
                               SECTION IV
                                  METHODS

SELECTION OF TOXICANTS AND EXPERIMENTS


of FiIhe,nHVWilHienftal Mana9ement Section  (EMS)  of the Oregon Department
of F,sh and Wildlife prov.ded a list of approximately 30 herbicides that

rPvtewedSwfthnDrr0rntai ^T in the past few years.  This list was
Station) for herbicide  h     (Pacif]c Northwest Forest and Range Experiment
aariculture and rr^iH^k,*  u ar"6 currently used  in forest management and
The Forestry Science Jihor ,  P°tential contaminants of aquatic ecosystems.
11 ic i u i c:> L i y ^^-icnCGLSuor^tT^rw -a^-i*-«„j j_     •    .                  *-    . ~-
and fish samoles for r! °^ tOry a9reed to  undertake the analysis of water
most forest sorL an ^   ?es    he»-bicides chosen for study.  Although in
most rorest spray appl ication<; nii-c^i..ui   c    ,
decided to test wate? soluble herblc?ip 1° formu atlons are used' Wf,   H
simpler design and clean-up of dot n    formulat,ons because they allowed
an parlipr mpi-ai 
migratory disposition  hlston-,^ i     ^a,K)-stimulated ATPase activity,
in yearling coho sa^n fonS ^^-Is'S" "^ ™lation °f herbicides
study was limited to the smolt Mfl h- %  YS exposure were examined.  Our
ment   Herbicide levels fo"d to  Le'a Tff!^6 '" ^.^™"J* dfel°P"
may be considerably different from IK     !• f  °n Year1ln9 coho salmon
or fingerling salmon.                 Se Which could affect alevins, fry,
EXPERIMENTAL FISH
        class refers to year of  spawning.
                                         6

-------
 eggs obtained from the Oregon Department  of  Fish  and Wildlife  (ODFW)  Fall
 Creek Salmon Hatchery, Alsea River,  Oregon,  under conditions similar  to  those
 reported by Lorz and McPherson (1977).  Steelhead fry  (Salmo gairdneri)  from
 Big  Creek Salmon Hatchery (ODFW)  were  used  in  the Esteron  tests  in addition
 to yearling coho salmon.


 EXPOSURE TO TOXICANTS

 Toxicants

      Twelve water-soluble and one water-emulsifiable herbicides were  tested
 under static exposure conditions.  The  herbicide  formulation tested,  its
 manufacturer,  chemical  name,  and  summary  of  registered  uses are  listed in
 Table 1.

 Static  exposure  tests

      The  static  toxicity  tests were  carried  out in 0.6l-m  diameter fiberglass
 tanks.   Water  was  continuously aerated  and 85% of the  120  L was exchanged
 once  per  day.  The fish were  generally  placed  in  the test  tanks 3 days prior
 to toxicant  exposure for  acclimatization  and recovery  from handling.  Toxicant
 solutions were mixed in a  separate container prior to  introduction into the
 tanks.   The  daily  exchange of toxicants always started with the control tanks
 and went  to  successively  higher toxicant  concentrations; the mixing container
 was  rinsed  following each  concentration change.   Upon completion of the daily
 toxicant  changes,  the mixing  bucket  was rinsed several times and then flushed
 overnight with running freshwater.   Where possible, toxicant concentrations
 tested were  selected from  published  LC50  data for  the particular herbicide.
 A minimum of seven  replicated concentrations, with 10 fish per test tank,
 were  used for  each  static  toxicity test.


 Mow-through tests

      Four herbicides  (Tordon  101, dinoseb, diquat and Esteron Brush Killer)
were  used in a flowing water  system.  This system consisted of a gravity flow
 diluter  (Figs. 1  and  2) capable of delivering 12  L/min to  each of 10 exposure
 tanks  (five duplicated concentrations).  A volume of 1000  L was maintained in
 each of the ten  1.54-m diameter fiberglass exposure tanks, and 95% of the
water was replaced every 3.7  h.  Submersible pumps were used in each tank to
 provide additional current, aeration and mixing.  Yearling coho salmon (210-
 225/tank, except the  Esteron  study which utilized 50 fish/tank) were fin-
clipped and allowed  to acclimate at  least one week before  the toxicant
exposure began.  The  concentrations were sublethal and based on prior static
 bioassays.  Water and toxicant flows in the  diluter were checked at least
once daily; only occasional minor adjustments were required.

-------
                                                    TABLE 1.   HERBICIDES  TESTED FOR ACUTE TOXICITY TO YEARLING COHO SALMON-/.
                   Common or trade name
                                                      Chemical  name
                                                                                                       Manufacturer
                                                                                                                                         Registered us
00
                   Acrolein


                   Amitrole-T(CytrolR)


                  Atrazine (AAtrexR)


                  Dicamba (Banvel11)


                  Dinoseb  (Premerge  3)
                                                      acrolein or acrylaldehyde
                                       3-araino-l,2,^-triazole  and ammonium
                                       thiocyanate

                                       2-chloro-ii  ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-
                                       s-trfazine

                                       3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid
                                      2-sec-buty1-^,6-dinitrophenol
                 Diquat (OrthoR Oiquat Dibromide)   6,7-dihydrodipyrido  (f,2-a:2',1'-c)
                                                    pyrazinedi?um  ion
  EsteronR Brush Ki1Ter


  Krennite


  Paraquat-CL



 2,4-D (Amine 0)



 2,li,5-T  ('Veedar")



Tordon" 101



Tordon 22K (Picloram)
2,4-0 propylene  giycol  butyl ether ester *•
2,4,5~T propylene  rjlycol butyl ether ester

Ammonium ethyl carbamoylphosphonate


I,1'-dimethyl-^,V-bipyridiniurn ion
                                                   2,4-dichlorophenoxyaeetic acid
                                                   (dimethylaraine formulation)
                                                  2,k,5~tri chlorophenoxyacetic  ac i d
                                                  (triethyfamine  formulation)
                                                  4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic
                                                  acid + 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
                                                  both as the triisopropanolaraine salts

                                                  't-amino-3,5.&~trichloropicol inic acid
                                                  (as potassium salt)
                                                   Shell  Oil  Co.-Texas^/


                                                   American  Cyanamid  Co.


                                                   Ciba-Geigy


                                                   Velsicol Chem. Co.
                                                                                       Dow Chemical^
                                                                                      Standard Oil
                                                                                      (Ortho Dlv.)
                                                                                                     Dow Chemical--7
£. I. du Pont-/
de Nemours

Standard OH
(Ortho Div.)
                                                 Diamond  Shamrock
                                                 Chem. Co.
                                                                                                    Amchem.  Prod.  Inc.
                                                                                                   uow Chemical Co.
                                                Dow Chemical  Cn.
   Control of  submerged aquatic weeds
   in  flowing  water.

   Non-crop uses such as right-of-way,
   industrial  premises and ditchbanks.

   Corn, sorghum, perennial ryegrass
  and winter wheat.

  Barley,  corn, oats, wheat and
  pasture  and  rangeland.

  Both non-crop and food-crop uses.
  Food crops  include:  alfalfa,  cereal
  grains,  fruits,  nuts and vegetables.

  Non-food use;  seed  crops  of alfalfa,
  clover and vetch  plus canals,  lakes
  and  ponds.

  Pasture and  rangeJand, forest and
  non-crop uses.

 Brush control on non-cropland areas.
 Preplant or directed spray on both
 non-crop and food crops such as
 alfalfa,  fruits,  nuts and vegetables.

 Range  and  pasture grasses,  vegetables,
 fruit, grains,  berries  and  certain -
aquatic  sites.

On an extended  basis  for  use on
pasture and  rangeland,  forests  and
non-crop uses.

Pasture and  rangeland
                                                                          Pasture and rangeland
               — CommericaJ  formulations of herbicides purchased from Wiliur Ellis Co. Portland, Oregon unless otherwise noted.
               ^/Oregon Weed Control Handbook, 1577.
               —^One liter sample provided by Shell Oil Company, Houston, Texas.
               —''DOW Chemical Company supplied 5 gal. Dow Premerge 3.
               S./Oregon State Dept. of Forestry  (Astoria) provided 1 gal of Esteron Brush  Killer,,
               —^Dr. H. Jlewton, OSC School of Forestry, provided  sample.

-------
Air stone.
                  Water inlets with
                  Spray heads (well,         Float  (connected via microswitch to toxicant manifold}
                  heated or chilled water)    (   /  /
                \
          -''---N-l-i
                     \i  PI?
   Waste
      water

     Toxicant  -
      Manifold
                             e^?
^
                                  LV!i
         Mixing —
            Boxes
  Distribution pipes
to exposure,  .-^-~
       L	
                                                                    L
                                                   *.*.
                KJ
      i\
 v-!-!-%
r--i  v
                                                   M—Kl

                                                                                      Head  Box
-<	i!

^S P. J>
                                                                                   Air stone
*
<>.
•


•

O
•. ••


&
•


_..


*


>,"
•
%

\




\
\




\
i . ,


/
/
/
                                      Microswitch and
                                      valve (allows
                             	 	^^ dumping toxicant
                                 |\ \. ff water or
                            1      v "% electricity fai/s)
;\
I
\
t \

«
%
%
\
                                                                               To
                                                                                 waste
                                                                                  water
                      To  Control  Tanks
                                                2.6 m
                                                                                                          1.5 m
                                                                                                       Toxicant
                                                                                                         Pump
                                                                                                       Covered
                                                                                                        Toxicant
                                                                                                         Reservoir
 Figure  1.   Diagram of flow-through diluter.

-------
Figure 2. Exposure tanks with diluter in background.
flowing tox«n^inmo6?r "fT* ?' ^ (ab°Ut 5°/tank) were e*po-d to
every 1 5 h            I-" fiberglass tanks.  Flows (5 L/min, 95* replacement

the 1 si-,                 tanks were provided by a siphon from mid-depth of
    i OH   tanKS used tor chronic pxnnQm-o   ATI

prevent loss of fish.                            tanks were covered to
     An activated carbon filter (Markin      Pi,
remove herbicides from the

                        "
                                                         W3S Set Uf> tO


WATER QUALITY
McPherson 1977).   Alkalini

the static exposure takWere

2).  In the flow-through system
                                                   past

                                                  °XY9en' pH and a™ia  i

                                                  " the Iaborat°rV  (Table
                                              oxygen was always >8.5 mg/L,
                                       10

-------
 PH  @7 03  ammonia <0.10 mg/L and hardness  @100  mg/L  as  CaCOj.  Water



 (9  0°C in  March increasing to 12.3°C  in  June).  Water temperatures were
 monUored  in  the static and flow-through systems with continuous recording
 thermometers.

 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
      The concentration  of  each herbicide was analyzed from composite water
       i n or  ...	
contai  ^T tth^an^PproprTate' fixative.  The water samples were generally

.tair.«"J^^
50 ml of teTwater   At  least two weeks usually elapsed between sampling
and subsequent extraction  and  analysis.  During this period the samples
were stored  in a  cool area.

     The analytical method  for each ^^'^/^^"^tons^varild

known for the^ deviations :__^di screpanc.e^
                                                    a, behavior of the
herbicide solution  in  the exposure tank.

GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY
     (Na,K)-stin,u,ated ATPase activity was measured on individual fl.h by
the whole gill homogenate method  (Johnson et al .  '^^'      (         }
terization'of this  enzyme assay was conducted on coho sa mon  Lor^et
1978).  Enzyme activity was measured at 37 C.  The release      g
Phosphate was measured by the ™'hod of Ern^^/J^ftrence between rates
stimulated ATPase activity was calculated as the °'™=r   of 0 5 mM
of inorganic phosphate liberated  in the presence or J^^J ofMry et
ouabain.  Protein was measured by a ^J^ciln static tests and 10-20
al, (1951).  Sample sizes ranged  from 5-6 fish in static tests ana
fish in the flow-through system.

TOLERANCE TO SEAWATER
                                                        once daily.

                                     11

-------
                           TABLE 2.  CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TEST WATER DURING STATIC TOXICANT
                                     EXPOSURE, AVERAGE VALUE WITH RANGE IN PARENTHESES.
to
Toxicant
Amitrole-T
Krennite
Dicamba
Dinoseb
Tordon R101
Tordon 22K (Picloram)
Atrazine
2,4-D
2,4,5-T
EsteronR Brush Killer
Dissolved
oxygen
(mg/L)
10.5
(9.2-11.0)
10.8
(10.7-11-0)
10.7
(10.2-10.9)
11.0
(10.7-11.2)
10.0
(9.0-10.8)
10.5
(8.6-11.2)
11.1
(11.0-11.4)
10.7
(10.4-10.8)
11.0
111. 0-11.1)
10.6
(10.2-10.8)
Ammon i a
(mg/L
NH3-N) pH£/
b/ 7.5-7.6
bj 7.5-7.6
0.32 7.7-7.8
(0.22-0.42)
0.52 7-7-7.8
(0.25-0.75)
0.67 7.4-7.6
(0.65-0.72)
0.32 b/
(0.25-0.41)
0.29 7.4-7-6
(0.22-0.42)
0.45 7.2-7-6
(0.40-0.48)
7.5
(0.5-<0.7)
b/ ' 7.4
Alkal inity
(mg/L as (
79
(75-82)
79
(76-80)
83
(82-84)
81
(77-83) .
81
(80-83)
bj
84
V
77
(76-81)
80
Hardness
;aC03)
100
(100-101)
100
(99.5-100.5)
102
(101-102)
101
102
v
101
(100-101)
105
99
100
Number
of
analyses
4
4
8
4
10
12
8
4
4
1
      ^/pH value taken after 2 rain of gentle stirring
      5/No data collected.

-------
   Salinity of the water was maintained at 30 +0.5 °/°o w'th a temperature
   of 10 +_ 1°C.  The seawater exposure period was a minimum of 10 days; if
   mortality was still occurring,  longer observation periods were used.


   ASSESSMENT OF COEFFICIENT OF CONDITION

        Each  month,  after a 24-h starvation period,  about 40 fish  were  selected
   randomly  from the stock and exposure tanks,  anesthetized,  weighed, and
   measured.   Individual  fish were weighed to 0.1  g  and fork length was
   determined  to  0.1  cm.   The coefficient  of  condition  (K)  was  determined  for
   each  fish  in  the  sample using the formula  K  =  100 W/l.3,  where U denotes
   weight  in grams and  L  denotes fork length  in centimeters (Hoar  1939).  Any
   change  in condition  factor compared to  controls probably reflected an
   effect of the  herbicide  on metabolic processes because the feeding behavior
   appeared to be unaffected  except in those  fish exposed to dinoseb.


  HISTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION

       Gill,  liver and kidney tissue were usually excised  from freshly
  killed fish and preserved  in Bouins solution for histologicaf examination.
  Three  to five fish were collected from herbicide concentrations  that
  caused death during the static exposure.  Five  chronically exposed  fish
  were collected  from each Tordon 101, dinoseb  and diquat concentration.
  °r. J.  D. Hendricks,  Dept.  of Food Science  and  Technology (Oregon State
  University)  made  the  histological examination of  the  fish.  Dr.  Hendrick's
  analyses are in Appendix II,  but will be referred  to  in  the results and
  discussion whenever histopathological damage was noted  for a  particular
  herbicide.


 DOWNSTREAM MIGRATION

      The effect of Tordon 101, dinoseb and diquat on migratory disposition
 was assessed by releasing marked control  and herbicide-exposed yearling
 coho salmon  into a tributary of the North Fork Aisea  River and trapping
 them 6.4 km  downstream.   The trap was checked  daily for the f.rst 10 days
 following  release,  then  every second or  third  day  thereafter.   On the  day
 prior to release,  about  100  fish from each 1.54-m exposure tank  (long
 exposure) and 50 fish  from each 0.61-m tank  (short  exposure) were anes-
 thetized  in MS-222,  weighed  and marked by freeze branding  and  a fin clip.
 No fish  smaller  than 11  cm were released  as  the "parr-smolt transformation"
 is markedly size dependent.  Releases were made between April  13  and May
 26,  1977  the normal time  of seaward  migration of wild juveniles.  Trapping
was terminated July  6, 1977, more  than a month after the last release.
                                      13

-------
     Probability estimates  for downstream migration  occurring  from each
release were tested for significance between  the control  group and each
treatment group.  Significance (P=0.05)  was  determined  by the  z test  where
the null hypothesis tested  was:

H0: PT = PC

HA: PT  * PC


                                 PC - PT
          z =
                       PC    (I-PC)      pc  •
                          nc               nT

and where:   P = a/n

a = number of migrants
n = number of fish released.

     A  7"km section of the stream was electrofished from above the release
sites to the weir in an attempt to collect non-migrants.  No coho that had
been released earlier were found, although native cutthroat and rainbow of
comparable size to the released fish were caught.  There were only two
small areas in the stream where our electrofishing gear appeared inadequate
because of the depth of the water.  Thus, fish that had not migrated by
early July apparently died as a result of predators, stress, natural
causes or latent effects of the toxicant exposure.

-------
                                     SECTION V

                              RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 results of  tests  with each  herbicide are d.scussed  below.
                                                               ironment
     Acrole.n  ..  the  co^n  na.e  for  acryjaldehyde  or
manufactured under  the  trade name °[  A<^' "  '   "„  di?ches)  for  the
in flowing water  only  • —— r       •       - __
tshawytscha) and rainbow  trout  io«^   » similar  to 24-h LC50 values of 75
static conditions.  These findings       ^.^  ^ ^ pg/L acroleln for
                                   reported by Burdick et al.  0964  us.ng
                                   Folmar (1976) reported the 96-n LC^O
                                      15

-------
                                          TABLE 3.  ACUTE TOXICITY OF ACROLEIN TO VARIOUS FISH SPECIES.
Species 	
Ami a calva (bowfin)
Carassius a u rat us (goldfish)
Carasslus a u rat us
Fundulus similis (killlfish)
Gambusia af finis
(mosquitof Ish)
Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomls macrochirus
Lepomis macrochirus
(bluegills)
Micropterus sal mo ides
(largemouth bass)
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
(chinook salmon)
0. klsutch (coho salmon)
Pimephales promelas
(fathead minnow)
Pimephales promelas
Rasbora heteromorpha
(harlequin fish)
Sal mo gai rdneri
(rainbow trout)
Sal mo trutta fario
(brown trout)
Toxic i ty
test
static, lab
field pond
static, lab
field tests
flowing, lab
static, lab
flowing, lab
field pond
static, lab
static, lab
static, tab
static, lab
static, lab
flowing, lab
flowing, lab
static, lab
flowing, lab
static, lab
flowing, lab
LC 5QL'
(ug/L)
62 (24 h)
2000(24 h)
1000(3 h)!/
2000(24 n)2/
240 (48 h)l/
149 (24 h)
61 (48 h)
77 (24 h)i/
2000(24 h)
140 (24 h)
100 (96 h)
183 (24 h)
160 (96 h)
80 (24 h)
1350(2 h)2/
68 (96 h)
150 (24 h)
115 Ct8 h)
84 (144 h)
140 (24 h)
60 (48 h)
5000(24)NEl/
I4o(24)i/
65 (24)
46 (24)
pH Temperature
7-2-7.3 69-72°F
69-7'ioF
7.1-7.3 69-72°F
60°F
7.2-7.3 69-72°F
7.2-7-3 69-72°F
7.4-7.7 20°C
7.4-7.6 IO°C
7.2-7.3 69-72°F
6.6-6.8 25°C
20°C
7.5-8.2 55°F
7.4-7-7 20°C
60°F
Alkalinity Hardness
89-93 '10-41
89-93 40-41
89-93 40-41
89-93 40-41
41-71
79-82 100-101
89-93 1*0-41
30 32
20
41-71

Reference
Louder and McCoy (1962)
Jordan et al. (1962)
St. Araant et al. (1964)
Butler (1965)
Louder and McCoy (1962)
Burdick et al . (1964)
Jordan et al. (1962)
Louder and McCoy (1962)
Louder and McCoy (1962)
Bond et al . (i960)
Lorz et al . (This study)
Louder and McCoy (1962)
Macek et al. (1976a)
Alabaster (1969)
Applegate et al. (1957)
Folmar (1976)
Bond et al. (i960)
Burdick et al. (1964)
-I/Concentration of acrolein causing S<)% mortality of exposed fish  In  time given  (except as noted).
2/Total mortality in time given.
T-yTest carried out in flowing seawater.
i'40* mortality-
2/No toxic effect of concentration tested;  (no  information as to percent active  ingredient or why compound  reacted  so  differently).
^/Unpublished data fish pesticide lab. Columbia Mo.

-------
       Ffsh  exhibited  a  narrow range of  susceptibility  to acrolein.  Louder
 and McCoy  0962)  noted the  24-h  and  96-h  LC50  values  for  largemouth bass
  (Aficropterus salwoides) ,  bluegills,  bowfins  (Amia. calva) , mosquito fish
  (Gambusia.  affinis) and fathead minnows  (Pimephales promelas RafinesqueJ
 ranged from 62  to 183  ug/L.   Burdick et al.  (1964) found  reduced toxicity
 corresponding to  increasing  size  for bluegills but not for brown trout
 fingerlings.

      Macek et al.  (I976a) investigated the effect of chronic exposure to
 acrolein on fathead minnows.  These  authors noted that adult fathead
 minnows exposed to acrolein  concentrations of 0 to 41.7 yg/L for 30 to 60
 days showed similar rates of  spawning, growth, and survival.  However,
 they observed only 2%  survival of larval fish exposed to 41.7 ug/L acrolein.
 The 6-day  incipient LC50 for  fathead minnows exposed to acrolein was  84
 yg/L,  and the estimated maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC)
 was >11.4 <4l.7 U9/L.

      Under field conditions, Green (I960)  found that  acrolein  applied  at
 1.0 to 2.0 mg/L  could kill carp,  Cyprinus  carpio,  and threadfin shad,
 Dorosoma  petenense.  Largemouth bass  and bluegill  appeared not to be
 harmed by 5-0  mg/L Aqualin,  but Moen  (1961)  found  Aqualin  to be toxic  to
 fish at 0.5 mg/L when applied to  a pond.   Meyer (1961) found Aqualin was
 toxic  to  fish  when applied to ponds  at  rates as low as 0.2 mg/L.   Catfish,
 ictalurus sp.  and  sunfish, Lepomis sp.  succumbed at  1  to 2 mg/L Aqualin,
 while  buffalo  fish, ictiobus sp.  were killed at 0.2 mg/L.   Chemical control
 of  filamentous green  algae was investigated  by  Jordan  et al.  (1962), but
 they found  acrolein to be erratic in  its performance  and the only herbicide
 tested that injured fish.   Furthermore,  they noted  50% mortality  of
 bluegill  and goldfish  in 24  h following  the  third and  fourth applications
 of  acrolein at 2 mg/L.   Applications  of  4  mg/L  produced SB%  mortality  of
 the bluegill and 95&  mortality of the goldfish  within  24 h.  Placement of
 fish in ponds  2  weeks  after  application of 4  mg/L  resulted in  death of all
 of  the  goldfish  and only 3%  survival  of  the  bluegills.  These  findings are
 contrary  to those  of Moen  (1963),  but probable  differences in water quality
 and an eightfold greater Aqualin  concentration  may account for  the extended
 toxic  condition.

     During  the  1960's  there  was  interest  in acrolein  as a fish repellent.
 Louder and  McCoy 0962)  reported  that acrolein  had been used successfully
 by  the  iowa  State  Conservation Commission  to drive fish downstream into a
 weir in the  Raccoon River.  They  concluded, however, that  the herbicide
 was not suitable for collecting fishes  in  lotic waters since ft required a
 lethal  dose  to repel fish.  Testing of overt avoidance reaction of rainbow
 trout fry to acrolein revealed that the fry probably would not avoid a
 lethal  concentration  (Folmar  1976).
j[xpe r ? men ta1 Res u 11 s

     The 96-h LC50 for yearling coho salmon was estimated at 68 yg/L
acrolein (Fig. 3, Table 4).  It was the most toxic water soluble herbicide
tested.  There was no apparent effect of acrolein on (Na,K)-stimulated


                                      17

-------
ATPase activity of the gills and little effect on seawater tolerance
following toxicant exposure (Table 4).   Our 96~h LC50 value is similar to
values given by Bond et al. (i960) and  Burdick et al. (1964)  for salmonids.
Histological examination of fish tissues (gill, kidney and liver) indicated
that acrolein had detrimental  effects which appeared to be concentration
dependent (Appendix II).

            TABLE k.  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY OF YEARLING
                      COHO SALMON EXPOSED TO ACROLEIN IN FRESHWATER
                      AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING TRANSFER
                      TO SEAWATER (MAY  10-27, 1977).
Concentration^/
(yg/L)
nominal
Control
5
10
20
30
50
75
100
Percent
survival—
(144-h exposure FW)
100
100
100
100
100
95
0
0
Gill
ATPase^/
M
NTH./
4.7
NT
NT
5.2
NT
NT
Percent
survival
(280-h SW)
93.8
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
86,7
NTSV
NT-X
2SActual concentration not measured.
— Twenty fish exposed per concentration.
—'Na ,K-activated ATPase activity of the gill; ymoles ATP hydrolyzed/mg
  protein/ht mean of 4 fish.
      measured, no survivors in the higher concentrations.
     The toxicity of acrolein was recently demonstrated on the Rogue River
above Grants Pass, Oregon, where Magnicide H, a gaseous form of acrolein,
was introduced into an irrigation canal for the control of algae and
submerged vegetation (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, notes in
Environmental Management Section file August 1977).  The release of the
treated irrigation water within 2k h of treatment rather than after the
recommended holding time of 6 days (manufacturer recommendation on toxicant
container) appeared to be the cause of total mortality of fish in a 10-mile
section of the Rogue River below the spill.  The Oregon Department of Fish
and Wildlife estimated that 238,000 fish were killed,  including 42,000
salmonids, with an estimated value of $284,000.
                                     18

-------
0-30,ug/L (5-30jjg/L)
100
90

_| 80
gj
> 70
^
tr eo
ID
<*> 50
2 40
LJ
0 30
(T
UJ 20
Q_
10

0
— m — (a — Qfl — EJ— BJ— 0
A 1 50 ug/L
\ \
\ \
\ \
— \ \
\ \
\ \

\ \
- k\
i 1
i I
• 1
'.\75^g/L
• 1
1 1
I!
100 \\
_ .ug/Lj L
i ^^y

— m — m — rg — BJ — 5) — (Q — -CD — 09 — D — D — CD — -Q
> \ n
B 	 Control
K^i i i/i /I
^J\J ,UU* L














,,,..11 i 	 1 	 1 	 l_J 	
24 72 120 24 96 168 240 28O
            Freshwater                        Seawater

                   EXPOSURE   TIME   (hours)


Figure 3.   Percent survival  of  yearling  coho salmon during exposure to
acrolein in freshwater and subsequent  survival upon transfer to seawater.


AMITROLE-T

Review of Literature:  Toxicity  to Fish and  Behavior in the Environment

     Amitrole (3-amino-s-triazole)  with  an  equal molar amount of ammonium
thiocyanate is formulated under the trade name Amitrole-T.   It is registered
for non-crop land clearing for  right-of-ways,  industrial premises, lawn
renovation, hardwood nurseries, and ditch banks.  Amitrole-T has also been
found to be very effective in the control of aquatic vegetation such as
water-hyacinths.  For spot treatment,  Amitrole-T  is normally applied at^
1/2 Ib active ingredient (a.i.) per 12 gal  of water.  As an area spray  it
is applied at rates up to k Ib  per acre.

     The literature contains many publications describing the fate of
applied amitrole.  In a study of 55 different  California soils, Day et al.
(1961) reported that amitrole disappeared  rapidly within 2 weeks^after
application.  Rapid decomposition of amitrole was also observed in a
similar study in Oregon soils  CFreed and Furtick  1961).  Sund  (1956) noted
that amitrole adsorbs rapidly and tightly  to soil particles having a high
base exchange capacity and a high organic matter  content.  Amitrole complexed
readily with metals in soil.
                                      19

-------
     Riepma (1962)  found that soil  microorganisms decomposed amitrole
rapidly and that the decomposition rate increased with increasing amounts
of soil organic matter.  Grzenda et al. (1966) observed a tight adsorption
of amitrole to the hydrosol and a fairly rapid decomposition of amitrole in
a pond.  Norris (1970) found that the common brush control herbicides,
2,4-D, amitrole, 2,4,5-T, and picloram were all degraded  in the forest
floor although the rates of degradation varied considerably.  In red alder
(Alnus rubra) forest floor material, 80% of amitrole was  degraded in 35
days.

     Amitrole's persistence  in water, following aerial application to
forest areas for brush control  in Oregon, has been studied  in several
investigations  (Marston et al.  1968, Norris 1967, Norris  et al. 1966, and
Tarrant and Norris 196?)•   In a study of a stream in a coastal, municipal
watershed  sprayed with 2 Ib/acre amitrole for control of  salmonberry, the
maximum concentration of herbicide,  155 ppb (in water),was observed  30 min
after  application  (Marston et al. 1968).  Only 26 ppb was detected after 2
h and  none after 6 days.   Norris  (1967) monitored amitrole  concentration in
a stream at a spray site treated at  2  Ibs/acre.   Five min after spray,
*t22 yg/L amitrole was  detected;  10  hours  later the concentration had
decreased  to 4  yg/L and  none was found after  3 days.

     The toxicity of  Amitrole-T is  thought  to  be  similar  to that of  ammonium
thiocyanate  (House et  al.  1967).  Russian studies have  indicated that
ammonium thiocyanate  is  lethal  to fish at 200  mg/L  (Demyanenko  19^*1 )•
Amitrole-T is  believed  to  be relatively  non-toxic to  fish (Meyer 1966).
Two-inch bluegills  tolerated 10 mg/L Amitrole-T  for  100  h (U.  S. Fish and
Wildlife Service  1963).  Sanders  (1970)  noted  bluegills  survived concen-
trations of  >100 mg/L Amitrole-T  for 48  h.

     The  literature contains a  number of publications  on  the toxicity of
amitrole  formulated without ammonium thiocyanate.   Bond  et  al.  (i960)  found
 the  *t8-h  LC50  for  coho salmon  to be 325  mg/L  amitrole  under constant flow
conditions and water  pH 7-5 to  7.7  and 1*1  to  71  mg/L  total  alkalinity.
 Largemouth bass were  able  to survive 1,000  mg/L  amitrole  under  static con-
 ditions,  but in flow-through apparatus all  test  fish  died at this  concen-
 tration  in 6 days.  A 24-h LC50 of  1,200 mg/L amitrole was  established  for
 blueglll  sunfish  by Hughes and  Davis (I962a)  in  water of 29 mg/L hardness
 and  pH 6.9.

      Hiltibran (1967) investigated  the effects of selected herbicides on
 fish reproduction.   Survival of fertilized  eggs  and fry of bluegill, green
 sunfish (Lepomls  cyanellus), smallmouth bass  (Micropterus dolomieu) and
 lake chub sucker  (Erimyzon sucetta) were not  affected by 50 mg/L amitrole
 under static conditions.
 Experimental Results

      The 96-h LC50 of Arnitrole-T was approximately 70 mg/L for yearling
 coho salmon (Table 5).  There was no apparent effect of the herbicide, on
 the (Na.K)-stimulated ATPase activity of the gills, however, upon transfer
 to seawater there appeared to be a dose-dependent mortality effect (Fig. A,
 Table 5).  Our 96-h LC50 value is one-third of that reported in the Russian


                                       20

-------
studies for ammonium thiocyanate (Demyanenko 1941).   The reason for the
discrepancy is unknown although differences in water quality or species
tested are known to be important variables.  Histological  examination of
dying fish showed degenerative changes occurring in the liver, kidney and
gill of fish exposed to 200 mg/L (Appendix II).  The deaths observed in
seawater generally occurred within the first 24-48 h following transfer
from the toxicant and probably were not directly related to impaired
osmoregulatory ability.

    TABLE 5   SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
              TO AMITROLE-T IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
              FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (JAN. 17"FEB. 6, 1977).
Concentrat
(mg/L)
nominal
Control 0
0.25
0.50
1.0 0
25.0
50.0
100.0
200.0
ion
measured
.03-0.06
0.20
0.37
.89-0.97
24.8
48.6
104.5
200.7
Percent
survival—/
(144-h exposure FW)
100
100
100
100
100
55
14.6
0
Gill
ATPase*/
2.1
2.1
NT£/
2.7
2.9,,
2.4^
NT
NT
Percent
survival
(336 h SW)
100
100
100
100
56.3
12.5
0
NT
— Twenty to 21 fish exposed per concentration.
-/ (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of the gill; mean of 5 fish.
c/
— Not measured.
-'Mean of 3 fish.
                                   21

-------
    100

_|  90

>  80

IE  70

W  60

t^  50

O  40
    20

     10

     0
            0-25mg/L
   \	x:-x—
                                  —X-	X	X	X—
               0-lmg/L
-x	x	x	x	x—x	

                                                             25mg/L
_  200mg/L
   J
                                                            50 mg/l
                                        J	1   ,1
                                                   192
                                                                   240
         24      72     120     24             120
            Freshwater                        Seawater

                   EXPOSURE  TIME  (hours)

Figure 4.   Percent  survival of yearling coho salmon during exposure to
Amitrole-T in  freshwater and  subsequent survival upon transfer to seawaten
 ATRAZ I NE

 Review of Literature:  Toxicity  to  Fish and Behavior in the Environment
      Atrazine (2 chloro-^t  ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine) is a wide
 spectrum symmetrical  triazine  herbicide.   It  is widely used to control many
 broad leaf and grass  weeds in  the  production of corn, macadamia nuts,
 pineapples, perennial  ryegrass,  sorghum and winter wheat.  Atrazine is also
 employed in some areas for selective weed  control in Christmas tree farming,
 grass-seed production, highway right-of-way clearance, and conifer refores-
 tation.  Hall et al.  (1972)  noted  that more than 100 million pounds of
 atrazme is applied annually to agricultural  lands in the United States.

      Atrazfne Is not as strongly bound to  soil particles as is the triazine
 nerb.c.de^imazine.  Its lower solubility  and  reduced adsorption add to its
 mobility in the soil.  Axe et  al.  (1969) studied the residual life of
 atraz.ne in the soil  and found that only 33*  of the herbicide remained
 after 5 days.  Under most  climatic and edaphic conditions, atrazine  (2-4
  ^??re)Dha?/e?ldual Phytotox'city for k-J months  (Harris and Sheets
 1965).  Residual carryover after repeated  application is minimal.
                                       22

-------
     Analysis of surface, subsurface, and finished waters in Iowa,  where
atrazine is widely used in corn production, indicated that the herbicide
was present in small amounts (<50 yg/L).   Atrazine levels in surface waters
correlated with discharge volume data for the river (Richard et al. 1975).

     Laboratory and field tests have indicated that atrazine is moderately
toxic to fish in comparison to other herbicides.  Macek et al. (I976b) in-
vestigated the effects of atrazine on survival, growth, and reproduction of
three species of fish.  Utilizing soft water (hardness 33 to 40 mg/L) and a
continuous flow apparatus, Macek et al. were able to show in acute toxicity
tests that both the 96-h and incipient LC50 for fathead minnows were
15 mg/L atrazine (95% Cl 11-20).  Their acute 96-h LC50 for bluegills was
>8.0 mg/L and the incipient LC50 was 6.7 (5-4-8.4) mg/L atrazine, which
agrees with the 96-h LC50 of approximately 6 mg/L atrazine  (wetable powder)
reported by Walker  (1964) for this species.  The 96-h LC50 for atrazine
toxicity to brook trout reported by Macek et al..  (I976b) was 6.3 mg/L (4.1-
9.7) and the incipient LC50 was 4.9 mg/L (4.0-6.0).  This is similar to the
48-h LC50 (12.6 mg/L) reported for rainbow trout  in a static bioassay
(FWPCA 1968).

     Bluegill and fathead minnow spawning, survival, and growth were not
affected by exposure to 0.095 and 0.213 mg/L atrazine, respectively  (Macek
et al. 1976b).  Hiltibran (1967) found that 10 mg/L granular atrazine did
not affect green sunfish embryo development, or bluegill and green sunfish
survival over 8 days.  Lake chub sucker fry (Ermyzon sucretta) survived
10 mg/L wetable powder atrazine.  Similarly, brook trout parental survival,
egg production, and hatchability appeared to be unaffected by exposure to
<0.72 mg/L atrazine  (Macek et al. 1976b).  Survival and growth of brook
Trout fry were, however, significantly reduced following 90 days of
exposure to 0.72, 0.45 and 0.24 mg/L atrazine.  Analysis of muscle tissue
from bluegills, fathead minnows, and brook trout  indicated that these fish
bioconcentrated detectable amounts of atrazine after prolonged exposure
(Macek et al. 1976b).

     Walker  (1964) observed no fish mortality after application of 2.0 to
6.0 mg/L atrazine to ponds  infested by aquatic weeds.  He suggested,
however, that atrazine had the potential to affect fish  in ways other than
direct toxicity.  A  reduction  in bottom fauna was observed  immediately
following application.  Among  the most sensitive  species were mayflies
(Ephemeroptera), caddisf1ies  (Tricoptera;, leeches  (Hirudinea) and
gastropods  (Musculium).  Studies by Macek et al.  (1976b) on the chronic
toxlcity of atrazine to selected aquatic invertebrates 'indicated that
morphological development of progeny  is particularly sensitive.  Exposure
of  two successive generations of chironomids to 0.23 mg/L atrazine resulted
in  reduced hatching  success,  larval mortality, developmental  retardation,
and a reduction  in  the percentage of pupating  larvae and emerging adults.
Continuous exposure  to 0.25 mg/L atrazine significantly  reduced production
of Daphnia.  Development to the seventh  instar of F] gammarids exposed to
0.14 mg/L atrazine was  reduced 25% below that of  lower concentrations and
controls.
                                        23

-------
     Herbicidal  destruction of aquatic vegetation may expose small  forage
fish to predation by large predacious fishes.   Furthermore,  fluctations in
oxygen tensions have frequently been shown to occur after application of
triazine herbicides.  These fluctuations were associated with phytoplankton
blooms occurring in conjunction with decomposition of submerged vegetation
(Walker 1964).
Experimental Results

     In our toxicity test, atrazine (AAtrex) appeared to produce a gradual
concentration dependent mortality in freshwater, with losses of 5 and 25%
at concentrations of 8 and 15 mg/L, respectively (Table 6).  Dead fish
showed signs of severe edema.  No apparent affect on (Na,K)-stimulated
ATPase activity occurred.  McBride and Richards (1975)  found that atrazine
significantly decreased sodium uptake of isolated perfused gills from carp
(Cyprinus carpio) but did not affect fluid flow rate at the concentrations
tested.  The authors indicated the effect of atrazine on (Na,K)-ATPase
systems should be studied, because other pesticides  (aldrin and DDT) have
been shown to inhibit  (Na+K)-ATPase (Cutkomp et al.  1971, Koch et al.
1971).  When the survivors were transferred to seawater, the group that had
been exposed to  15 rng/L atrazine suffered a 25% mortality  (Table 6).  The
deaths occurred within the first 24 h and probably resulted from the poor
condition of the fish  (due to toxicant exposure) and not osmoregulatory
failure.  Histological examination of three fish exposed to 15 mg/L atrazine
showed no apparent affect on liver or kidney tissues but hypertrophy of
gill epithelium was evident  in two of the fish  (Appendix II).

       TABLE 6.  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO  SALMON
                 EXPOSED TO  ATRAZINE  IN FRESHWATER AND THE  SUBSEQUENT
                 SURVIVAL FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (MAR. 2-19,  1977).
Concentration
(mg/L) Percent survival-/
nominal measured (144-h exposure FW)
Control
0.25
0.50
1.0
3.0
5.0
8.0
15.0
0
0.21-0.23
0.48-0.51
1.31-1.38
3.85-4.25
4.47-5.62 -
10.65
18.0-18.8
100
100
100
100
100
100
95
75
Gill
ATPase^/
2.8
NT£/
NT
3-4
NT
NT
2.4
2.3^
Percent
survival
(264-h sw)
100
100
100
100
100
100
94
75
^/Twenty fish exposed per concentration.
-' (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of gills; mean of 5 fish.
— Not measured.
1/M,
   Mean of 3 fish.
                                       24

-------
DICAMBA  .

Review of Literature: Toxicity to Fish and Behavior in the Environment

     Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) is one of the most extensively
used benzoic acid herbicides in the United States.  Production of dicamba
in 1971 was estimated to be 6 million Ibs of active ingredient (Lawless et
al. 1972).   The herbicide was introduced in the early 1960's for the
control of preemergence and postemergence broadleaf weeds in cereal  grains
(Frear 1976 and Velsicol Chem. Co. 1967).  Phenoxy-tolerant broadleaf weeds
and brush species are also controlled by foliar and area applications of
dicamba.  Current registration for this herbicide is for use on barley,
corn, oats, wheat, pasture and rangeland, where it is applied at rates
ranging from 1/4 to 8 Ib/acre.  The dimethylamine salt of dicamba, formu-
lated as a liquid, is sold under the trade name of Banvel, but is also
available in granular form as the acid or amine salt.

     Dicamba has been shown to exhibit intermediate persistence in many
soil types when compared to other herbicides (Burnside et al. 1971),
remaining phytotoxic for several  months  (Klingman and Ashton 1975).   It has
a relatively high water solubility (7900 mg/L)  and has been demonstrated to
move within the soil  profile with water flux.  Studies by Trichell et al.
(1968) have shown that runoff losses of dicamba are limited.  The vapor
pressure of dicamba is quite low, so minimal amounts are lost through
volatility (Montgomery et al. 1976).  Photodecomposition of dicamba is
similarly limited.  Indirect evidence from a number of studies suggests
that microbial  degradation may be instrumental  in reducing dicamba per-
sistence (Frear 1976 and Hahan et al. 1969)-  Morris and Montgomery (1975)
noted that following spraying of a brushy area in coastal Oregon with 1.12
kg dicamba/ha,  water residue levels rose sharply to 37 ppb about 5 h after
spraying and then declined slowly to background levels by 37.5 h.
          •
     The effects of dicamba on fish have not been well investigated.
Toxicity tests  with dicamba indicate a low toxicity to salmonids and warm
water fish species.  In static tests conducted by Bond et al. (1965) the 2k
and 48-h LC50 values for juvenile coho salmon were 151 and 120 mg/L active
ingredient, respectively (methyl  orange alkalinity approximately 55 mg/L,
pH about 7.7).   Rainbow trout were killed by a concentration of 320 mg/L
dicamba in 72 h (Bond et al. 1965).  Bohmont (1967), in his literature
review of Cope's 1962 and 1963 work, however, reported an estimated 48-h
LC50 for rainbow trout and bluegill of 35-0 mg/L and 130 mg/L dicamba
(Banvel D), respectively.  Hughes and Davis  (1962b) reported 24 and 48-h
LC50 values of 600 and 410 mg/L for the  liquid formulation of dicamba for
the bluegill; however, when Banvel D acid was adsorbed onto vermiculite
they found a 24-h LC50 of 20 mg/L.


Experimental Results

     No mortalities were observed in yearling coho salmon exposed to dicamba
(Banvel) concentrations up to 100 mg/L (Table 7).  Gill  (Na,K)-stimulated
                                       25

-------
ATPase activity appeared unaffected by the herbicide.  Histological exami-
nation of gill, liver, and kidney tissue indicated no apparent effect of
exposure to dicamba (Appendix II).  Following 144-h exposure to the toxicant,
the yearling coho salmon were challenged with seawater.  Fish previously
exposed to the lowest concentration, 0.25 mg/L dicamba, showed a 32%
mortality during the 11 days of the seawater challenge (Table 7), however,
no deaths occurred at higher concentrations.  The deaths began after 96 h
in seawater and concluded at about 200 h.  No explanation is available for
this unusual pattern of mortality.  The deaths followed the time pattern of
osmoregulatory failure noted in previous seawater challenge tests following
copper exposure (Lorz and McPherson 1977).                        '"nuwuiy

    TABLE 7.  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
              TO DICAMBA IN FRESHWATER AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING
              TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (JAN. 6-23, 1977).
    Concentration
        (mg/L)
nominal
measured
Control
0.25
0.50
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
0
0.19- 0.22
0.40- 0.42
0.54- 0.56
3-15- 3.33
10.05-10.11
50.5 -53-2
108.2-109.9
                                100
                                100
                                100
                                100
                                100
                                100
                                100
                                100
ITwenty fish exposed per concentration.
-(NaK)-stimulated ATPase activity of gillsf mean of 5 fish.
—Not measured.
Gill
ATPase*/.
2.52
NT£/
NT
NT
1.64
NT
2.0k
2.20
Percent
survival
(268-h SW)
100.0
68.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
KREMITE
Review of Literature:  Toxicit
                   to Fish and Behavior in the Environment
gal water for spot treatment.                  3 5 lb/acre or * lbs/100
     Krenite
inactivated
 has a high water solubility
in the sot, (Oregon Weed Control Ha^o^'W7)?'
is  nonvolatile,  and
is rapidly
Soil  residue
                                       26

-------
studies have indicated that, in 2 weeks, half of the herbicide is converted
to carbamoyl phosphonic acid which is subsequently converted to C02
humic acid fractions within 8 weeks.  Bottom
months or less (Dr. James Harrod, duPont Co.,
sediments lose Krenite
 unpublished report).
and
in 3
     There is little published data on the toxicity of Krenite to fish.
Unpublished findings of E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company, Inc.  (technical
pamphlet) indicate that rainbow trout and fathead minnow have a 96-h LC50
of 1,000 mg/L (product), while bluegill sunfish exhibit a 96-h LC50 of 670
mg/L (product).   Laboratory tests have demonstrated that Krenite is not
bioaccumulated.   Residues in fish tissues were comparable to the concen-
tration of the herbicide  in the water  (Newton and Norgren 1977).


Experimental  Results

     No mortalities were observed in yearling coho salmon exposed to
Krenite concentrations up to 200 mg/L.  When survivors were transferred to
seawater only minimal mortality occurred (Table 8).  Krenite is not very
toxic to coho salmon, as neither freshwater survival nor subsequent seawater
survival were affected.  There was no apparent effect of Krenite on the
(Na.K)-stimulated ATPase activity of the gill (Table 8).

   TABLE 8.  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
             TO KRENITE IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
             FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (FEB. 2-17, 1977).
Concentration
(mg/L)
nomi nal
Control
0.25
0.50
1.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
200.0
Percent
survival—/
(144-h exposure FW)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Gill
ATPase*/
2.2
1.8.
r1/
NT-'
1.7 -
NT
NT
NT
2.7
Percent
survival
(216-h SW)
100
93
100
100
100
100
100
100
—Twenty fish exposed per concentration.
-/ (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of gills; mean of 5 fish.
—'Not measured.
PARAQUAT

Review of Literature: Toxicity to Fish and Behavior in the Environment

     Paraquat is the common name for 1,I'-dimethyl-4,4"-bipyridiniurn ion,
It is formulated under the trade names OrthoR Paraquat and GramozoneR.
                                     27

-------
Paraquat formulations are presently available as chloride salts (Lawrence
et al. 1965).  The pure chloride salt is a white solid that forms a dark
red aqueous solution.  Paraquat is a nonselective, quick-acting herbicide
and des.ccant, and is used extensively due to its effectiveness on grasses
and most broadleaf weed species (Calderbank and Slade 1976).  Paraquat is
registered for use as a directed spray on preplant treatment in many tree
crops and several f.eld crops including alfalfa, corn, soybeans, sugar
beets, and tomatoes.   It is also employed as a preharvest deslccant on
cotton, potatoes, and soybeans, and in aquatic weed control.  Normal
application rates for paraquat are 1/4 to 1 Ib (a.i.)/acre, and 0.1 to
i. 5 mg/L in the aquatic environment (Calderbank and Slade 1976).

                         U * ?Uart?rnarV ammonium salt, highly soluble in
                         organic solvents, and nonvolatile.  The herbicide
              r
ponds at rates of 2.1 and 2.5 mg/L persisted in the water for 6 and
                                               "-
     Burnet (1972) found that amphi
                                        were
muscle.  Upon transfer of the fish to fre^hwa^r ?h ^^ bUt nOt ln the
declined. Similar findings for whole-body res dues ^f T uT *?""*
were reported by Cope (1966).  When severaPnnnH        qU3t and Paraquat
paraquat (emulsion) or diquat  oaraau^ M   P°nds were treated with 1  mg/L
bluegill sunfish (1.21 mg/L whofe-bodf r bl?accur!atlon Was detected in
accumulation was detected (0^9 mg/L)" ™*^ ^ Httle di"uat b'-
trout, green sunfish, and channel  catfish ,£ i    para<'uat in ra!nl>ow
0.37 mg/L or less.         cna™ei  catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were
Colorado pond.  Residue 1 eve s
8 days after treatment and tnen decined!
Bluegtlls, largemouth bass  fahead
trout exhibit approximate ihrLhotd
                                                     ter treatment of a
                                                    3 maX?lhum °f K58
                                           levt!s w;th fish
                                           app'cation '» a remote
                                                                      in
                                                                        bility.
                                      28

-------
paraquat (cation) for a 96-h contact period (Lawrence et al.  1965).   Davis
and Hughes (1963) reported a 48-h LC50 for bluegill  sunfish  as
100 mg/L paraquat (cation).  Under static conditions (pH 7.6 to 8.0,  hardness
210 to 290 mg/L), brown trout had a 48-h LC50 with paraquat  of 82 mg/L
(Woodiwiss and Fretwell 197*0.  Alabaster (1969) reported a  48-h LC50 for
harlequin fish as 32 mg/L paraquat using a flow-through technique and water
of 20 mg/L hardness.  Butler  (1965) exposed the estuarine longnose killifish
(Fundulus similes) to 1.0 mg/L paraquat and found no effect.

     Information on paraquat toxicity to fish under field conditions
is limited.  Yeo  (1967) reported that smallmouth bass and mosquito fish
were killed when placed in ISO-gallon plastic pools with 1.0 and 3-0  mg/L
paraquat (pH 9.A).  Blackburn and Weldon (1962), however, reported that
paraquat applied to a small Florida canal at 1.0 mg/L was not toxic to fish
(water temperatures 29 to 33°C, PH 7.6).  Earnest (1970 noted that a
minimum of 34% of bluegills, placed in a Colorado farm pond, died within
48 h after treatment with 1.14 mg/L paraquat (surface temperature  18.9-
25.0°C, alkalinity 69-129 mg/L and pH 8.0-10.4).

     Newman and Way  (1966) reported no direct effects of paraquat or diquat
on aquatic invertebrates  in their experiments.  They did, however, note
severe oxygen depletion at one location  following decay of the treated
aquatic weeds.  A low oxygen content  is  postulated  to have caused the
deaths noted among Hirudinea,  Isopoda, Odonata, Coleoptera, Tnchoptera,
Gastropoda, Lamellibranchiata and captive trout, although free-living
coarse fish and trout appeared unaffected.


Experimental Results

      In our study the  96-h LC50 of paraquat-CI  was  76 mg/L  for yearling
coho salmon.  Deaths occurred  in a dose-dependent manner depending on
concentration and exposure time  (Fig.  5).  When surv.vmg fish were
transferred to  seawater,  all  coho  salmon previously exposed  to  50 mg/L died
during the first  40  h  of  exposure.  Similarly,  64%  of  the fish  previously
exposed  to 10 mg/L  died during the  first 68  h  in  seawater (Table 9)   Our
96-h LC50  value of  76  mg/L  is slightly lower thar.the  48-h  LC50  of 82 mg/L
given  for  brown trout  by  Woodiwiss  and Fretwell (1974).  The  different
species  and water quality, however, of the  two  test solutions  could  account
for  this.  The  (Na.K)-stimulated ATPase  activity  of the gil  s  was not
affected  by exposure to  paraquat-CI.   Histological  exam.nation  of fish
exposed  to 100  mg/L paraquat-CI  for 120  h  showed  ev.dence of degenerate
damage to gills,  and kidneys, and  slight necrot.c areas in  the liver
 (Appendix II).   Earnest  (1971) similarly reported necrosis'of liver  tissue
following treatment of the Colorado farm pond with  paraquat.
                                         29

-------
0-lmg/L 0-lmg/L
100
90

_l 8°
^ 70
«•••
r5 60
LL.
Z>
(/> 50


2 40
LU
0 30
CC
CL 20
10

0
— x--r-3|-T-x 	 x-y-x 	 :
1 \ \ lOmg/L
i » ^
\ \ \
\ \ \
I ' V
i \ |00 T50mg/L
• /^^rtO/!_ J\.
\ x> *
i \ \
\ \ \
\ %» \

^ \ K

\ h
\
\200 \
_ Lmg/L v
>t
	 1 	 1 	 |\. 1 frx*
•y— X 	 X 	 X 	 X 	 X 	 X 	 X 	 X 	 X 	 X
\\

\\
n
i \
i \
I q IOmg/L
\ \
' \

l \
i Y, rt
1
T
\50mg/L
\
V

** fZ 120 48 120 168 240
Freshwater Spnu/nter
                  EXPOSURE TIME  (hours)

Figure 5.   Percent survival  of yearling coho salmon during exposure  to
paraquat-CL  ,n freshwater and subsequent  survival upon transfer  to seawater
TABLE 9.   SURV
                          G'LL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
               .           L 'N FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
             FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO  SEAWATER  (MAR. 22-APR.  7 1977).
   Concentration
      (mg/L)
nominal      measured
Control
0.25
0.50
1.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
200.0
i ii i • i .
0
0.1*»- 0.19
0.50- 0.52
1 .08- 1.12
10.6
56.3
112.7-113-7
238.7-251.2
 Percent
survival^/
    exposure
                                  100
                                  100
                                  100
                                  100
                                   95
                                   35
                                    0
                                    0
-Twenty fish exposed per concentration.
                                   °f
                                                          Percent
                                               Gill      survival
                                              ATPaseV  (240-h SW)
3.0^
NT£/
k.k6
1.96
1.90
NT


100
100
100
100
36
0
NT
NT
                                    30

-------
Review of Literature; Toxicity to Fish and Behavior in the Environment

     The chlorine-substituted phenoyxacetic acids, 2,M> (2 A-dichlorophenoxy-
acetic acid) and 2,4,5'T (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetlc acid) were .introduced
as selective herbicides following investigation of their growth-regulat.ng
and herbicidal properties during World War II (Templeman 1955).   They are
effective against many broadleaf weeds but not against gram.naceous weeds.
The herbicide 2,4-D  is registered for use on forests, range and  pasture
grasses, rye, wheat, barley, oats, corn, asparagus, apples, pears,  grapes,
potatoes, blueberries, cranberries, non-cropland uses, turf, and certain
aquatic sites.

     Most phenoxyalkanoic acid herbicides are formulated as the  salt or
ester form.  Amines of 2,^4-D are the most commonly used salt forms  of
2,l»-D, although the  sodium, potassium and ammonium salts are also used.
The di-and tri -substi tuted amines are particularly important; they  are
highly soluble in water and are used in the formulation of water so uble
concentrates. Normal rates of application of 2fW> amines are as follows:
1A to 1-1/2  Ib/acre (a. I.) for most crops; 2 to 3 Ib/acre  (a.i.) for
forest spraying; and 0.25 to 0.50*  (a.i.) for the control of emergent and
floating weeds.  The ester formulations of 2,4-D are extremely  .mportant
and are used extensively in forestry and agriculture for vegetation control.
The ester formulations are 10 to 100 times more toxic to fish and other
aquatic organisms than the dimethylamine salt, but are often chosen for^use
because of desirable physical properties such as:   control of droplet size,
limited solublity in water, good spread of herbicide upon contact with
vegetation being controlled, and persistence  in the environment.

     The salts of 2  k-D have very  low volatility.  When dissolved  in hard
water they form  insoluble and essentially  inactive calcium, magnesium, or
iron salts of 2,4-D.  Leaching of  2,M>  in soil is dependent upon so.l type
and herbicide solubility in water.   Decreased  leaching occurs in clay and
organic soils due to adsorption by  soil  colloids.

     Crosby  and Tutass  (1966) found  that 2,4-D decomposed  rapidly  in the
presence of  water and ultraviolet  light  or sunlight, and  they identified
the decomposition products.  Audus  (1950)  demonstrated  the  .mportance of
microbial degradation of phenoxyacetic  acid  herbicides.   In a warm, moist
loam, 2,4-D  can  be  expected  to disappear within 2  to  3 weeks  (Loos  1976).
Morris  (1970) noted  that 3k% of 2fM> was  degraded  in 35  days when  applied
in a  red alder forest floor.

     Wojtalik et al .  (1970  found  no harmful  or distinguishable response  or
accumulation in  zooplankton,  phytoplankton or macroinvertebrates following
treatment of water  with 20  to kO  Ib per acre (acid equivalent,  a.e.) of
DMA-2.4-D.   The  authors believed  there  was  little danger  of biomagnif ication
of the  2,4-D in  contrast to  chlorinated hydrocarbon  pesticides.  Wojtalik
et al.  reported  residues  (in water)  greater  than  0.02 mg/L  at only  2 of  19
stations J»  weeks after  treatment.   The  authors  stated that  disappearance  of
DMA-2,/*-D  from water is  rapid compared  with  the herb.c.des  dichloben.l and
fenac which  persisted at detectable levels for up to 160  days.
                                         31

-------
and fUh fnM        d.methy amine salt  of  2,4-D  (DMA-2.4-D) in hydrosol
Harmln (iq?il?   M'P    aPPl|cation hav* been  reported by Schultz and
wtth el ier 2  2k   iVor 8 ifi I £***  Ge°rg!a' and MiSS°UrI  Were treated
tectab e llvei of A n     % kg/ha °f  the herbicide.  The highest de-
aool ication ?I f  '5   '? Wat^ (°'692  mg/L)  was found 3 days after
DMA-2 k-b   !h.\P°K  '!!  u°?!a that had been treated with 8-96 kg/ha
ma/L) 28 H^v,  !f^     ^   d decreased  to  trace amounts (less than 0.005

S^T1"1'3^^^^
seven days  after  treatment.  Largemouth  bass,  channel catfish, bluegill,
and xftT/^A Ish'Lepomis microlophus, were  held in live cages during
Fifteen Lr^n/TIr^-5  u° morta]]^ "**  observed  in any of  the ponds.
2 J-D M  n  tn  n mn   /,  ?  fmPled contained  detectable residues of DMA-
m^t»h i-       2'?!° mg/k?)' Radlometric  measurements of the uptake
water  hvdrJn? dlS"1P?ti°n of.the DMA salts of ring-labeled C^-2>-D  in
water,  hydrosol.  and f,,h  are in general agreement with these  findings

                             2!S-
                                  >attish- ••"«>'
muscle (Schultz 1971)       '   le>Pylonc «eca>kidney>nver>gin>brain
residues  were  found for onty  tort'perioSs'of ?f7> -°ted 'hat  h^^"e
adjacent  to  forest treatment areas   r I    ?       '" streans  "ithin °r
have been found  ,„  uddST'        ""         ''    '"' m9/
                                                                   ears
exceeded 0., mg/L  n
     A review of the toxtcity of DMA-2 4-n h^rk: -^   -  ...
are relatively  low in toxicity to fish   ?„?    n«S, indlcates  that
LC50 for rainbow trout at liS'mg/L   Lis IndrH( ^ t^^  9 96"h
and Davis (1963) tested the toxiciiy  of <^f?e r"^65 ( 963)  and HugheS
bluegills.   They found considerab e ^artaifon ?n th01?"1"  °nS °f 2^"°
formulations and even in the toxicity of a sini?  f* tO*lc]t* of different
researchers  felt that these i neons stenctes        °rmula^°n.   The
different batch lots and/or
                                    32

-------
and the dimethylamine formulations were the least toxic to bluegills  of 11
formulations of 2,4-D tested (800-166 mg/L as A8-h LC50 depending on
batch).  The isopropyl ester and butyl ester were the most toxic (0.8 and
1.3 mg/L as 48-h LC50 concentrations, respectively, for bluegi lls) .Davis
and Hardcastle (1959) found differences in LC50 values for 2,4-D and  other
herbicides when waters from two different sources were used m  toxicity
tests.

     Schultz and Harman (197^) reviewed the literature concerning aquatic
use of 2,4-D compounds as a prerequisite for registration of 2,4-D for use
on irrigation canal banks and for use in moving water.  They noted that
many formulations of 2,M> are available, but the .0"« "»s* JfTJ ^""SL
in aquatic situations is the dimethylamine salt of 2,4-D (DMA-2,4-D).  The
ester formulations have also been used, but are many times more toxic to
fish and other aquatic organisms than the dimethylam.ne salt.  Meehan
et al. (1974) tested the toxicity of various formulat.ons of 2  4-D to
salmonlds and noted that <50 mg/L 2,4-D acid produced no mortal , ty_ except
in pink salmon fry.  The butyl ester, however, was very toxic <*"s'"9
almost complete mortality in all species at concentrations >1 mg/L   The
isooctyl ester was the least toxic of the ester formu ations.  M^han
concluded that specific phenoxy herbicide ester formulations should be
chosen with regard to their impact on aquatic organ, sms if there ,s a
possibility that the chemical will enter the water.

     Rodgers and Stalling (1972) exposed rainbow trout, channel catfish
and bluegills to a C^ labeled butoxyethanol ester of 2.A-D and studied
Us u "ke from the water by fed and fasted fish   Maximum res.due concen-
trations were observed in most organs of fed f.sh w.th.n 1-2 h of exposure
and w?th in  -8 "exposure for fasted fish.  The herbicide or its metabo-
lites were eliminated rapidly after maximum residue concentrations were

                                '
 10 months after  treatment.

     Histological and  biochemical changes were observed in bluegi 11 sunfish
       "   ! -D, Este ron 39  C
                                            f
                 .       --
deposits  in  the  blood  vessels  and  stasis and engorgement of the brain
circulatory  system.


Experimental  Results

      ,         A      mortalities  were observed when yearling coho salmon
      In our  study,  no  mo^aj'*l^/^ 2,4-0  (DMA)  for  MA h  (Table  10).
were  challenged  w.th up  to  200 mg/L  of z      .       activity of the gills
Similarly, no affect on  the lNa,K  st ™u      d to  2 i,.D were challenged
 or  our  test  results  to those of  -,—...-••  --  -    -            desired
 would be  safest to use the DMA formulat.on of  2,4-0  if  the desired
 effects could be achieved.


                                      33

-------
  TABLE  10.   SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY OF YEARLING COHO SALMON
              EXPOSED TO 2,4-D  IN  FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
              FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (DEC. 29,  1976-JAN. 14,  1977).
Concentration
(mg/L)
nominal measured
Control
0.25
0.50
1 .0
10.0
50.0
100.0
200.0
0
0.25- 0.18
0.52- 0.59
1.07
10.4
59.6- 64.0
106.8-115.4
170.0-237.0
Percent
survival—'
(144-h exposure
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Gi11 „/
FW) ATPase^-7
1.4
NTH/
NT
1.6
NT
NT
1.0
1.3
Percent
survival
(240-h SW) 	
100.0
94.8
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
— Twenty fish exposed per concentration.
-'(Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of the gills;  mean of 5 fish.
—'Not measured.
2,4,5-T

Review of Literature:  Toxicity to Fish and Behavior in the Environment

     The herbicide 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid)  is identical
to 2,4-p with the exception of an additional  chlorine atom on the number 5
carbon in the ring.  Many of the roses, legumes,  and broadleaved plants
that are res.stent to 2,4-D are controlled with 2,4,5-T.  The herbicide has
been cleared for use on pastures, rangelands, right-of-way, and forests.
rt is not reg.stered for use on food crops nor for use in water, on ditch
hTrh^lHTfc ST- °r recjftional  areas> °r "ear populated areas.  The
herb.c.de 2,4,5-T  ,s normally applied at 1 to 2 Ib/acre (a.i.)  for area

treatment."           ^^  ^'''^ Per 10° 9a11otlS of solution for spot


       n/rf ft S°lub111ty °f,2'2|'5:T  <23« mg/L) is less than that of 2,4-D
      mg/L)  (Montgomery et al. 1976)], and this influences its pattern of
      he sodium salt of 2,4,5-T, for example, unlike that of 2,4-" has a
      lubility and  ,s difficult to get into a herbicidally act ve solution.
 use. The
 low sol
                                                                 -cium,
      Under  condttrons  favorable  for microbial degradation  2 4  5-T  has a
                                     -
 following application,  and there was  l«s ?han  0  02  in/h       •"
 1  year or 0.76* of the  originally  applted 245-7   0?K    remain"s
 ester and amfne formulations  are'coSpa  able to  ttese of'z  S
                                                                     of  the

-------
     Data on toxlclty of triethylamine salts of 2,4,5-T to aquat.c organisms
are scarce.  Kenaga (1974) reviewed the literature concerning the tox.city
to fish of 2,4,5-T and its derivatives.  Exposure to the commercial formulation
DED-WEED* at concentrations >72 mg/L (a.e.) for 2k and 96-h resulted in at
least 50* mortality of bluegill sunfish, channel catfish, and fathead
minnows.  Exposure of rainbow trout to the same formulation [>72 mg/L_DED-
WEEDR (a.e.)] resulted in 502 mortality in 2k h whereas at concentrations
of 0.07-0.72 mg/L  (a.e.) for 96 h exposure Kenaga also reported mortality
rates of 50*.  Spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) exposed to 0.4 mg/L (a.e.; tor
2k h showed no mortalities.  The fathead minnow exposed to 40.2 mg/L for
72 h had no mortality, but at concentrations >72 mg/L for 2k or 96 h at
least 50* mortality was observed (Kenaga 1974).  Day.s and Hughes  (1963),
utilizing the triethylamine salt of 2,4,5-T (Crop R.der*) found the 2k and
48-h LC50 for bluegill sunfish to be approximately 53 mg/L (a.e.;.
Experimental Results

     No deaths were observed  in yearling coho salmon exposed Jo concen-
trations of 6-7 mg/L of 2,4,5-T (trlethylamine salt, We^ar) for 1^ h
(Table 11). Similarly, there was no apparent effect on  (Na.K) -stimulated
ATPase activity of the gills.  When the fish were placed  in seawater only
minimal mortality occurred  (Table  11).  The lack of mortality durmg the
toxicant exposure was surprising considering that concentrations of 0 07-
0.72 mg/L  (a.e.) were reported to  cause 50* mortality  m 96 h to ra.nbow
trout  (Kenaga  1974); however, no water quality data were presented
Generally, LC50 values for  herbicides obtained at 2k h  have been about 10
times greater  than the LC50 concentration noted for 96-h exposure.

   TABLE 11  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO  SALMON EXPOSED TO
   TABLE 11. SURVIVAL ANU^  ^ FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL

             FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER  (MAR. 31-APR.  17, 1977).
    Concentration
         (mg/L)
nominal        measured
Control
0.05
0.10
0.25
0.50
1.0
10.0
0
0.016-0.021
0.041-0.043
0.13 -0.15
0.27
0.57 -0.74
6.64 -7-0
Percent .
survival—
(144-h exposure FW)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100

Gill
ATPase^/
4.06
NT£/
NT
NT
NT
3.52
4.66
Percent
survival
(240-h SW)
100
95
100
100
100
100
100
S/Twenty  fish exposed per concentration.
      K)-stimulated ATPase activity of the galls; mean of 5  fish.
      measured.
                                       35

-------
ESTERON BRUSH KILLER
Review of Literature:  Toxicity to Fish and Behavior in the Environment
o ;  ro          Kil!er c?ntalns ^^1  concentrations of 2,4-D and
2,4,5-T [2 Ib each/gal  (a.e.)]  as the propyleneglycol  butyl ether (PGBE)
ester. This ester of 2,A-D and  2,J»,5-T is  very soluble in oil  and organic
solvents but has very low solubility in water.  However, in the presence of
emuls.fiers and with agitation, an emulsion is formed  in water; Esteron
Brush Killer is applied in this manner.

     The 2,4-D esters of low-molecular-weight alcohols have an appreciable
vapor pressure  Loos 1976).  The long-chain alcohols with an ester linkage
animal" V°1at'1e a"d present less of a hazard to non-target plants and
                          ?s-orPtIon of these ester formulations is also
of nvdrolv -              °f de9radat!on to the parent compound.  The speed
are ^ r  3 °-   '  '^  6SterS ^ been related' to PH'  Alkaline conditions
condU ons f Ken^ K7J?CSt;rlf !CatI°n of these compounds than are acidic
s?ud ed dLrS T  97 ^  I6aSley and Wmian* (1969, in Kenaga 197*)
ester forSSS     !"     °  ^number of 2,4,5-T esters including the PGBE
slit ar ratlf «? *   ? ™t*r °f pH 6'5 a11 °f the herbicides exhibited
    X s rates ?or% ['n'"^00 ^ * cont-'e^ration of I mg/L (a.e.).
   l-T «tlr« nf    2'1|-J1esters should be faster than those observed for
   .i) i  esters o
     -T «tr« nf         1
   .i) i  esters of comparable structure.

respectively (FWPCA 1968).                   2,4,5-T was 980 and 570 yg/L,
                                                                     int?
                                                                      pyl
                                                                     may
and chemical properties   The     l-T  S   t^*™** in thelr P^slc
cients, whichare rel«ed to the grelter abL  ^ "'^ partition coeff
fatty tissues such as skin and gills   The RGB?  £ °t ^ comP°unds i
esters of 2,/^,5-T have relative?! hlnh     >  ? ' BE> butyl ' and 'sopro
partially explain th.lr^S1^c^h^J*;J7^«|§l-Jt.. which m

     Sublethal effects of PGBE esters nf 9 L n u
fish (Cope  1966).  Spawning of blulgin su^f7 h     ^ demonstrated for
ponds treated with 5 and 10 mq/L of ih  h  I  •JWaS delaVed 2 weel
-------
     Much of the fish toxicity work on the phenoxy herbicides concerns  the
PGBE esters of 2 4-D or 2,4,5-T, but little has been done on mixtures of
these compounds!' Hughes and Davis (1962b) found that both the 24 and W-h
LCSO's for bluegill sunfish exposed to the PGBE ester of 2,4-D were 29  mg/L
under static conditions in water with a mean PH of 6.9 and a mean hardness
of 29 mg/L.  Meehan et al. (1974) observed that the 96-h no-effect  evel
for coho salmon fingerlings exposed to the PGBE ester of 2,4-D was less
than 1 mg/L.  There was a mean fry mortality of 26.7^ after 96 h of
exposure to 1 mg/L of the herbicide in water that ranged in hardness from
10.0 to 33.6 mg/L as calcium plus magnesium.  A 48-h LC50 of 1.1 mg/L PGBE
ester of 2,4-D was reported by Cope (1966) for rainbow trout (no water
quality given).  Butler (1965) observed that the 48-h LC50 for the
estuarine longnose killifish was 4.5 mg/L in seawater.

     Studies on the toxicity to fish of the PGBE ester of 2,4,5'T have  been
reported by Kenaga (1974).  This herbicide appears to be generally more
toxic than the corresponding PGBE ester of 2,4-D.  All rainbow trout died
within 24 h at 0.13 mg/L  (a.e.) of the PGBE ester of 2,4,5-T, and all f.sh
were dead after 3 h of exposure to 0.67 mg/L of the herbicide (no water
quality given).  After 7 h of exposure to 0.13 mg/L of the  (PGBE) Reddon"
formulation, all bluegill sunfish were dead.  Bluegills exposed to Esteron
245 (PGBE) had 24- and 48-h LCSO's of 17 mg/L in static water with a mean
PH of 6.9 and a mean hardness of 29-0 mg/L.  Exposures of fathead minnows
to different formulations of the PGBE ester of 2,4,5-T [0.13 to  .33 mg/L
(a.e.)] all resulted in 100* mortality within 72 h (no water quality
given) .

     Bioconcentration of  the PGBE ester of 2,4-D has not been observed   in
fish tissues.  No detectable residues of the herb.c. f were found  n
bluegill sunfish exposed  to 10 mg/L PGBE ester of 2,4-D  (Cope 19&6).

     Mat Ida et al  (1975) noted that when a mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T as
the bu?ox fethanol 'ester" (commercially called "Brush Killer"  "asaer a   Y
spread over 9-5 hectares of forest at a rate of 150 kg/ha, no appreciable
change was noted in the aquatic community.  The ?«thors were unab e to
detect the chemical in the stream during the 48 h observation period
following spraying.  Similarly, fishes (cherry salmon and dace f.ngerlmgs)
showed no mortality nor abnormal behavior and the J^'J^™^1^  a]
vertebrates appeared unchanged.   In a later laboratory st udy ^^a et  al.
(1976) found that "Brush  Killer"  (mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4 5 T) exnib ted
toxic effects on aquit Ic  sow bugs Asellus hilgendorffii and cherry salmon
       I '
considered a nonspecific  response  to a toxic agent.
                                       37

-------
Exp_g_r_i_menta 1  Resul ts

     No deaths occurred In yearling coho salmon exposed to Esteron Brush
Killer for 96 h at <_800 ug/L (nominal concentration under static conditions)
nor in the flow-through exposure tanks (210 yg/L maximum nominal concen-
tration).  No deaths were observed in the subsequent seawater challenge
tests  (Table 12). In both the static and flow-through systems the measured
amount of Brush Killer was very low even though extra care was taken  in the
mixing of the toxicant solutions.  The reason for the low recovery is
unknown.
      TABLE 12.  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED TO ESTERON
                 BRUSH KILLER AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING
                 TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (MAY 31 -JUNE 16, 1977)
         Concentration
            (yg/L)
nominal                 measured
A. Static exposures

    Control
        1
        7
      25
      75
      150
      300
      450
      800
3.6-
1.9-
2.4-
7.0-
 .7-
 30
 45.0
 72.6-
104.1-
147.7-159.0
  2.6
  2.8
  7.2
 35.4
 51.0
 73.6
111.6
 B.  Flow-through exposures
     Control
       35
       70
      140
      210
                          0
                        23.7
                      41.4- 45.7
                      59.6- 74.0
                      84.3- 88.3
                                         Percent
                                         survival—/
                                     _(96-h  exposure
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                                             100
                         100
                         100
                         100
                         100
                         100
                               FW)
                                          Percent
                                          survival
                                         (290-h SWJ
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
(15)^
(20)
(15)
(20)
(15)
(20)
(15)
(10)
(10)
                                         100   (20)
                                         100   (20)
                                         100   (20)
                                         100   (20)
                                         100   (20)
          -
                      through.
or kidney tissue.  The qi 1
curved gin filaments? ep  tel
in some lamellae (Appindlx M)
     Steel head trout fry were al
          „ younger
                                            P° apParent affect on either l
                                              ,the fo]^'^ abnormalities
                                              hypertrophied, and aneurisms
                                     38

-------
In the first exposure test approximately 50* of the fry exposed to 1200 yg/L
(nominal concentration) for 48 h died  (Table 13 A   whereas ,n a ^st 2
weeks later, only a single death was recorded at 1200 yg/L ^en though the
test was run for 96 h  (Table  13 B.  Unfortunately the water samples from
tSef^t So and 1200 yg/L groups were lost during "tract, on.  Thus « *>
not know if total concentration of the herb.c.de were s.m, ar be™f " ™*
two tests   As was noted  in the test with yearl.ng coho salmon, the measured
Sncen r^ion of Brush Killer was only a fraction of the expected.  Reasons
for the discrepancy in both the nominal and measured concentrates of the
herbicide and deaths observed between  the two tests are unknown.
       TARIF  11    SURVIVAL OF
       TABLE  13-      ™L°F
                               BIG CREEK WINTER STEELHEAD TROUT FRY
                               STERON  BRUSH KILLER, FAIRPLAY LABORATORY,

                  OSU  (MAY  31 -JUNE 4,  1977)-
    Concentration
         (yg/L)
nominal	measured

A. May  31-June  4,  1977
Control
      1
      7
    25
    75
    150
    450
    300
   1200
             32.9-34.0
             12.1-12.3
             13.2-13-5
             17.7-17.9
             35-2-37.2
             43-9-44.3
             77.4-80.1
 B.  June  12-16,  1977
Control
800
1000
1200
6.5- 7.2
202.0-269.0
240.0-243-0
226.0-246.0
                                   Exposure
96 (60)
96 (60)
96 (60)
96 (60)
96 (60)
96 (60)
96 (60)
48 (60)*
48 (63)
                                      96 (60)
                                      96 (60)
                                      96 (60)
                                      96 (60)
                      Percent
                      survival
                      (range)
100
100
100
 98.3 (100-96.7)
100
100
100
 88.3 (100-76.7)
 50.8 ( 80-24.2)
                                                             100
                                                              98.4 (100-96.7)
                                                              98.4 (100-96.7)
                                                              98.4 (100-96.7)
         nun^er of fish exposed in replicated tanks under static conditions.

                                     „**, -icant ensure initiated in
   afternoon of same day.
     Dr. D. Woodward, U. S. Fish
Research Unit  (personal c^u;lcatl,r       ut fry.
with the PGBE ester of 2,4-D for cutthroa  trout Try
toxicity to be affected by PH or water hardness.    in
Woodward and Mayer (1978) noted that surv.va } °
was significantly reduced when they were cor 1  '

                                            be 31
                                                        He did not find
                                                                publication
                                                       a        H

                                                                  concen.
                                                                           yg/L
                                                           -D PGBE ester'
                                     39

-------
Following a simulated field application  Woodward  and  Mayer  (1978)  recommended
that water residues of the ester should  not  exceed  100  yg/L  after  a  single
application nor 31  yg/L following multiple applications.

     Histological  examination of the steelhead trout  fry  showed  liver and
kidney tissues to be normal, but gill  tissue (including controls)  showed
evidence of hypertrophy of the chloride  cells (Appendix II).

     Examination of steelhead trout fry  showed evidence of  2,4-D and
2,4,5-T residues following exposure to Brush Killer (Table  A-l).  The whole
body residues generally increased with increasing concentration  and
exposure time.  Fish that were moribund  or dead exhibited the highest body
residues (Table A-l). Fish placed in clean water for  48 h following  48 h of
toxicant exposure showed slightly reduced residue levels.
TORDON 22 K (PICLORAM)
Review of Literature: Toxicity to Fish and Behavior in the Environment
the ™tt  (J"am'no:3.5,6-trlchloroplcoUnic acid) or picloram is one of
              h               Plant 9r°Wth ^lators currently employed
             There are three basic formulations: potassium salt
                                       ester-  ToLn 22K


         0o                                        -
 are  lost through volati 1 iza  ion   P?c oram h^K  ''T am°UntS °f
 extensive  photodegradation b^u traviotet Uoht   H   T J° Under9°
 solutions  or  soil surfaces (Hall et a 1.1 968)       Sl">l'9ht in aqueous

     Although degradation of nirlnram :^  i
 (National  Research Council Can'ada  974  NR^  '] temper?te cli-tes
 does occur by nonbiological  processes (Han^iqAQ?0^1''0" ln the S°H
 colloids is minimal  in  neutral oTalLnn" !  ^ }'  Ms°W*™ to soil
 with decreasing PH,  increasing organic conten! \nd™ SOll'.but '"creases
 trations of hydrated  iron and'aluminium oxides' (Foy
                                                       Cement of the
 Picloram through  rainfall and  leach inaT'C C°n^nt-  The removal of
                               leachmg  ls one of the major factors governing
                                    40

-------
its dissipation under field conditions  (NRCC 197*).  This mobility is also
of environmental concern, as  leached picloram may be transported to aquatic
ecosystems such as ponds, lakes, and streams.  Residue levels 'J surface
runoff have reached 2 mg/L following application at 1 . 1  kg/ha (NRCC  97*).
However, studies have indicated that under most conditions only small pro-
portions of picloram  (less than 5%} applied to a watershed are transported
in surface runoff.

     Only negligible  residues of picloram occur In streams, apparently due
to rapid dilution of  the herbicide  (Haas et al. 1971).  Field plots
adjacent to the mouth of a small stream were treated with 1.1 kg/ha of
Picloram, and water samples were collected 0, 0.8  and 1 .6 km downstream
from the plots following each rain  for 5 ninths after application.  P^°J™
was detected in the stream samples  only during the f , rst significant runoff
(0.029 mg/L).  No residues were found in subsequent samples  (Haas et al.
1971).

     Picloram contamination in lakes has not been reported, but levels In
farm ponds adjacent to plots  treated with 1.1 kg/ha picloram reached 1 mg/L
(NRCC 1974).  Dissipation of  the herbicide In ponds has been shown to be
rapid.  One study found an initial  decline of U to 18* of p.cloram per
day, followed by a decline of less  than 135 per day 15 weeks after appli
cation (Haas et al . 1971).  Residues of picloram in the pond-bottom sediments
(H8 yq/kg) immediately following appl i cat ion were only twice that m the
water (Kenaga 1973, In NRCC 1974).  After 75 days, residues of 7 ^Ag
Picloram were detected in the pond-bottom sediments and 0.1 yg/kg p.cloram
was found in the water.
     It is apparent from a number of studies that the toxicity °J
to fish is influenced by its formulation and the water qua , ty (NRCC
Woodward 1976, Sergeant et al.  1970).  Technical gra de P,c lora m (a  .
was found to be more toxic under alkaline conditions (Woodward 1976).
Increasing the PH from 6.5 to 8.5 increased the tox.c.ty to cutthroat and
lake trou? by a factor of 2  in  both species    Increasing temperat ^ did,
but increasing hardness did  not, lead to an increase m toxicity (Woodward
1976).

     The acute toxicity of picloram varied considerably with the formu-
lation and fish species.  The isoocytl ester of P'^^PP68^ J° £ *£
most toxic commercial formulation (NRCC 197*. Sergeant et al. 1970, Kenaga
1969)   LC50's reoorted for  this formulation are approximately   mg/L for
sensU.iveCs ecieT  Tc^ty levels of Tordon ^K (potassium sat)  are
considerably lower as shown  for several fish spec.es in Table If.
     Based on available information, chronic f
not cumulative in terms of lethality (Woodward_ 976, NRU,    _
exposures  however  have been shown to affect fish development and growth
(Woodwar 'l^Kand swimming response and liver histopa thology ( ergean t
et al. 1970).  Woodward (1976) observed that the no-effect concentrat.on of
technical grade picloram for lake trout was apparently <35 P9/L, as this
level of herbicide reduced fry survival and growth.  Most mortal t es
occurred during yolk absorption, which took 4-5 days longer in p.cloram
treated fish.

-------
        TABLE 14.   MORTALITY  DATA FOR  SEVERAL  FISH  SPECIES  EXPOSED
                   TO TORDON  22K FOR 96  HOURS^/.
Fish species
                          Water temperature
                                             Concentration
                                               (mg/L) a.e.
                                                               Percent
                                                               mortality
Black bullhead


Bluegill

Brook trout


Brown trout


Fathead minnows


Green sunfish


Lake emerald shiner

Rainbow trout
                              50


                              65

                              50


                              50


                              50


                              50


                            69-73

                              50
                                                 S.k

                                                 91
                                                 69

                                                 52
                                                 22

                                                 29
                                                 22

                                                 91
                                                 39

                                                 30

                                                 58
                                                 22
-Modified from Kenaga (1969).
-Calculated or derived 96-h LC50 values.
-^Highest concentration producing no mortality.
50
 0

50

50
 0

50
 0

50
 0

50
 0

50

50
 0
formulation of picloram (for
death (Sergeant et al. 1970).
transfer to clean pond water.
shortened the recovery times"; ,,,
fish failed to recover.  Analyt
sunfish swimming behavior.  Ser
grade and commercial
                                              _	 or the 22% commercial
                                   I  hour)  caused imnrabi1ization but not
                                        of  normal  swimming response fo..-
                                   !"bse3uent  exposures to the herbicide
                                         er a fourth exposure, many of
                                         picloram did not affect green
                                         oworkers suggested that technical
                                     Picloram  might contain a toxic impurity
technical  picloram (1.2 mq/L)  Xr ?CH      °m green  sunf'sh exposed to
                                        reve^ed
                     .
cells (Sergeant et al.  1970)
disappearance of
tubular or smooth
panied by liver enlargement.
                                      T reve^ed abnormalities in these
                                     "ltrastructural changes involved the

                                                             'nCreaSe In
                                                ChanQeS Were also accom"
                        en.   ncreasin  t
from 1 to 5 days did not alter thl , ?! 9     exposure time of the herbicide
                           ter the ul trastructural pattern.

-------
     Residue analyses of aquatic organisms exposed tp picloram "
that this herbicide is not bioconcentrated in invertebrates or along food
chains (NRCC 1974).  Daphnia exposed to 1 mg/L of the potass'um salt of
Picloram had whole body residues of the herbicides equal to that present ,n
the water (Hardy 1966).  Bioconcentration of pic oram (acid) was not
evtdSt in mosquito fish exposed to 1 mg/L (a...) for IB days  Youngson and
Meikle 1972).  The concentration factor for these f.sh on a wet ^.ght
whole body basis was only 0.02.  The 18 days of exposure to p.cloram was
adequate to achieve a steady state level of accumulate in the mosqu.to
fish.
Experimental Results

     In our study, the 24-h LC50 of Tordon 22K was
                               - -rr__4. of picloram on
                                          Histological
                                                               K    fmu]ated
   seawater after exposure to this  low Tordon
seawater mortalities at  low concentrations occurred
101 and Dicamba exposures, and they also were not ex pi a
tanks were used for seawater challenge tests for Jhe three chemicals
oxygen concentrations were @9 mg/L when the mortalities occurred.
               FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER
nom i na1
      Concentration
          (mg/L)
                                 Percent
                                 survival—/
                                     exposure
                 Gl11  h/
                ATPase^-7
Control
  0.25
  0.50
  0.75
  1.0
  5.0
  15.0
  30.0
                   0-0.12
                     1.67
                     1.89
                     2.76
                   3.89-^.23
                  10.54-11.84
                  31.81-41.23
                  37-95-45-10
100
100
100
100
100
100

NT
NT
2.2
1.8
 Percent
 survival
(288-h  SW)
   100
    75
   100
   100
   100
   100
   NT
   NT
 , ,*wwicy  fish  exposed per concentration.           .
 f' (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity;. mean  of 4  fish.
 •*•/ ]\T/™\ ^~  WljCI. -* «V • V H* J^ J
      measured.
      dead  in  48  h.
      dead  in  less than 8 h.
                                        43

-------
   100


   90


< ^


> TO

—> 60


   50


   40
CO
LU
O

LU
Q.
    20


    10


     0
                      0-5mg/L
         -x—x	x—x	x-
                                                           (92
                                                                  240
        ^    _

        24     72      120-        48      96     ^4"

            Freshwater                      Seawater

                  EXPOSURE TIME  (hours)

Figure 6.   Percent survival of vearlinn  ,.  h
Tordon 22K (picloram) in fr^h.,!*     S      salmon during exposure to
to seawater.             rresnwater and  subsequent survival upon transfer
  tration as possible factors9^?  t°  tGSt f'Sh density and ammonium concen-
  following exposure to low concentra?r«»   * ^served seawater mortality

  the  toxicant, survivors were n?»r !  '    °f T°rdon'  Following exposure  to
  apparent ill effects or death^ !,    '!! Seawater and survival  monitored.  No

  various fish density and ammoni^  obse^ed in seawater tests of the

  therefore, did not appear ™b&]g™T^Bb]e 16) -  Se^ater deaths,

  levels during toxican? exposure       ^ W'th fish denslty« or

-------
    TABLE 16.
               SURVIVAL OF YEARLING COHO SALMON AT THREE  FISH  DENSITIES
               EXPOSED TO TORDON 22K OR TORDON 22K PLUS AMMONIUM  CHLORIDE
               IN FRESHWATER, AND THE SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING
               TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (FEB. 11-28, 1977).
Fish
density
No. /tank
10
20
5
10
20
10
20
10
20
5
10
20
5
10
Concentration (mg/L)
Nominal
Tordon
Control
Control
Control
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.80
Measured
_
-
-
0.058
0.048
0.11
0.11
0.50
0.42
0-32
0.59
0.71
0.67
0.89
NH/jCl
(added)
0
0
0.80
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.80
0
0
0.80
0
.
3" ~
0.34
0.70
1.05
0.25
0.64
0.38
0.63
0.23
_ f _
0.65
1.01
0.22
0.61
1.04
0.27
•i— — . " •
                                                        Percent survival
                                                     144-h
                                                    exposure FW
-/Measured ammonia level, average of six daily values.
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                          100
                                                                  260-h SW

                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
                                                                     100
TORDON 101
    «•»» W I  ^ I l.^l«Ji.vii *•*"•' ~'     i  i i    ---- - -••

     The Dow Chemical Company's Tordon* 101 formulation contains 5-7* •-•-
(0.54 Ib/gal) tri isopropanolamine salt of P'cl^am plus 2 .2* a .e    ^
(2.0 Ib/gal)  2,4-D as the *•"? Isopropanolamine saU.  The
Picloram with 2,4-D enhances the translocat.on of 2 £0    £ornpet i t ; Ve .
1976).  Other reported interactions are el^nr,a^e^fa° weeds, woody
Tordon 101 is used in the control of ^annua  and perenmal^B   ,    ^
Plants, and vines on non-crop lands Includ'n9/l^e°'f ,J2 to 3 ga1/acre
frcatiins suggest Tordon 101 appHcat.on a t th.  ate of J/2 ^
for the control of broad leaf weeds, and I to H gai/a
and vines.
     The effect of Tordon 101 on fish has been revised by Kenaga 0 969) .
                                                *« '"" l     LC50,S for
                                                          ™/L (a.e.) 2,*-
                                                           »   Fathead
                                                        TtaVh LC50 for
                                                 3.7
            e
         s were  exposed  to  varying  level? f
»ater at 10°C.   Lynn  (1965 in  Kenags  19«)
brook,  brown, and  rainbow  trout were  50.3,
0, and  ,3.7.  ,3.1  and 86  m9/L
                                       45

-------
Experimental  Results
Static exposure —
of
and
  K

     "
ac iviv of th  am
activity of the gills, but this lowered
                            ^°xicitY  test  in  December  indicated a 24-h LC50
                            (concentratl°n  of 2,4-0  and  picloram combined),
                               G a  Steep mortality curve (Fig.  7).   Tordon
                               reduction  in the  (Na,K)-stimu?ated ATPase
  ;
noied
  ;
ibly
                                  did  not
                                                                to affect
                                                                        „
                            for the  deaths,  but  no abnormal  conditions were
        TABLE 17.
                                     ATPASE  °F DARLING COHO SALMON
                                     101  'N  FRESHWATER AND THE
     Concentration
         (mg/L)
nominal          m«
Control
0.25
0.50
1.0
5.0
15.0
30.0
60.0
^ •_i___^i ^*
0.29
0.50- 0.62
1.32- 1.59
6.42- 7.35
18.1- 19.8
31.5
67.8
	 '
— TWeiltU fj Qh ovrnne*^y7 «
Percent
survival^/
(144-h
exposure FW)
100
100
100
100
100
100
«0/


Gill
ATPase^/
— — — — — —
1-9
NT!/
NT
1 .4
1.5
0.9

Percent
survival
(360-h SW)
100
25
65
100
100
100


Gill
ATPase£/_
4.0
4.9

5.0
4.0

     ,ATPase
|/Mean of 5 fish ^ea^ater
tgflot measured.
-All fish dead within 60 h.
-'All fish dead within 2.5 h
                                     46

-------


_J
1
tr
(/)
h-
2
UJ
O
o:
UJ
CL


100
90
80
70
60
50

40
30

20
10
0
                 0-15 mg/L
       —X	X	X	X	X	
      TeOmg/L]
	x—x—
	)Q~X	X	X—X- —X	X	X—X	X
"K
  \  \
                                          \
                     '*.  0.5mg/L
                       "^.
                                           •
                                           \
                                             \ 0.25 mg/L
                                              W
                                                    ^~^—.-^)_.^._.—..
      48
        24     72      120
            Freshwater
                 EXPOSURE TIME  (hours)
     96     144
        Seawater
                                                        192    240     360
                                                         =
transfer to seawater.
     Another test  with Tordon 101 was 'tate   in
test tanks were dosed with toxicant stock that was nn         erf when the
the other tanks were dosed with toxicant stock tha t     P  J  |n toxicant
experiment was initiated.  There appear ed to ^  no d               Jhe
effect regardless  of when the tox1"?* S5S J3/L) i«d In the March test
highest toxicant exposure concentration U^ mg/u;           however, 95^ of
was c,ose to the estimated 2A-h LC50 of Decemb.   (^/^..^      n-
the yearling coho  salmon exposed to 22 m9^      f Tordon 101 is unknown,
tration)  died.  The reason for ^V^LlJearl ing coho salmon are more
but if the measured values are real . tnen ^ '   J no mortality noted
                                  l 5W,roups represenUnHHe, of

-------
         TABLE  18.  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED TO
                    TORDON  101  IN FRESHWATER, AND THE SUBSEQUENT
                    SURVIVAL FOLLOV/ING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER
                     (MAR. 13-29,  1977).
        Concentration
            (mg/L)
nominal            measured
                                       Percent
                                       survival—/
                                   (144-exposure FW)
                       Percent
                       survival
                     (240-h SW)
New stock daily

  Control
    0,25
    0.50
    1.0
   22.0
                0.13-0.16
                0.12-0.13
                 8.41-8.83

Stock mixed Mar.  13.  1977
100
100
100
100
  5
100
100
100
100
  0
0.25
0.50
22.0
0.19-0.38
0.1*1-0.50
9.21-9.7
100
100
0
100
100

   Twenty  fish exposed per concentration.
 Flow-through exposure--
      Following marking  (fin  excision)  and  time  for  acclimatization to new
 surroundings, yearling  coho  salmon were  exposed to  Tordon  101  in the flow-
 through system beginning on  Mar.  28,  1977.   Groups  of yearling coho salmon
 were placed in seawater following 144-h  and  380-h exposure to the four
 Tordon 101 concentrations.   No deaths occurred  in either the fish exposed
 S I?  ?", ^TK1" ?u6 S?ntro1 fUh dUrlng the 24° h  of seawater exposure
 (Table A-2). The (Na,K)-st,mulated ATPase activity  was not affected by any
 ^r6  ^°H  101 execrations tested  (Table  A-2).  Exposure to Tordon
 101 for 360 h  produced no apparent effect on the condition factor of
 yearling coho  salmon (Table A-3).  The fish all fed welt during the
 exposure, and  the general decline in condition factor was probably  the
 normal change  in the length-weight relationship that occurs as the  fish
 undergo transformation  to smolts  (Wagner 1974a).

      A release of 10 groups of coho  salmon exposed  to Tordon  101  for  360  h
 and  5 groups  exposed for 96 h was made  into Crooked Creek on  April  13,
 1977, and  downstream movement was monitored.   The  coho  salmon exposed to
 0.3  mg/L  for 15  days showed slightly stimulated  migration compared  to the
 controls,  whereas the other concentrations  (0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/L)  showed
 a dose-dependent inhibitory response.   Approximately a  10%  difference in
 movement  was noted  between  controls  and the group  receiving 1.8 rog/L
 Tordon  101  over  the 84 days that migration  was monitored  (Fig.  8a).  The
 differences observed,  however,  were  not statistically significant (P = 0.05)

-------
Coho salmon that  received 36 h exposure to Tordon 101  (0.3-1.8 mg/L) prior-
to release did not migrate as well as the control group except for the
0.3 mg/L group which again showed slight migratory stimulation.  In the
otherVh exposure groups (0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/L) the m,fl™^™^!*
was less than observed for the control but no relat.onsh.p to concentration
of Tordon 101 was apparent (Fig. 8b).  The majority of f^"'^ *?™*nt
of all groups of  coho salmon occurred within the f.rst 5 days of release

(Table A-4).
(.Appendix  I I).   me consequences ui  L...^  ^i-	;	-
effect on  the fish in terms of ultimate survival  is unknown.

     Coho  salmon that had been exposed for  15 days to 18 mg/L Tordon 101
              ,          c -.——fc—rti  -rich were  ki I leu ana sevciai ui j^u*. «••
     i comparable group or control  IISN "»=                  TnrHnn 10.1   No
         ^       •  j -,,,4 onalw^^H  for bioconcentrat ion or  iuruun i«i.   «•
     , systems excised and a?a^°  [°Joram was  noted.  Youngson and Meikle

,.././r,1owever!adidnfi>nd residues  of 0.21 mg/kg  in mosquitofish exposed to

1  mg/L picloram  for 18 days.
DINOSEB  (PREMERGE)


Review of Literature;
                                                                  selective

                                                                     TheY
     Dinitrophenols are  the oldest organic chemical  patented
weed control  (Kaufman  1976).  Two of  these c°?P°""ds' J' ^ c
A, 6-dinitrophenol) and  dinosam  have  become widely used herb^c
Phenol form of dinoseb  is oil soluble and ^T^ed ^^ suiu_ _

concentrate.  The amine  or *^*™s**"a^s.   DOW  Premerge (alkanol amine
are formulated under a  variety of trade names         dinitroamines and
salt) was utilized  in  this study.  The  9enerai            seedling weeds and
ammonium salts has  been  for postemergent control of  most    ^ »f ^
grasses in cereal,  tree, and  vegetable  crops.   HPP   pe  (g  jj depending
amine salt of dinoseb  is normally from   •:» to      g    controi ditch bank
upon the crop. Dinoseb  is also applied  in some  areas to

weeds (Woodward  1976).
                                                            i  _ A. . ._.^*v*t *H n A I f"

     The fate and behavior of herbicides
rate of decomposition,  volatilization,  m
(Kaufman 1976).  Dinitrophenols  fPPefrJ;   Izat:lon „, WM1.	
undergo photolysis  at  alkaline pH.   voiar':!j    of  son acidity, high
dinoseb has been shown  to occur  under conait.      ^ fo1iowing applicatt
temperature,  and surface soil moisture. ne  altnough in mineral
may cause leaching, particularly in  aj.k^1'"®.    (Montgomery et al. 1976,
days, adsorption may  slow the  rate  ot  |ea~n' *..,   degrade dinitrophenols.

Kaufman 1976).   Certain soil  mi5roorga"'S^rsTsoi 1  conditions  is 3-5
The residual  life of dinoseb  under warm, moist  so         ^ season  to the
weeks; residual  carry-over  is not expected  to occur

ne*t  (KUngman and  Ashton  19751-
                                                      n  acid  solutions, but
                                                    or codisti Ilation of
                                                    °

-------
     70


     60


     50


     40


     30
_  20
v°
O^
     10
o
A. 360 h.
                                   -•-o	//	<50,6mg/liter
                                                      l,2mg/liter-
                                                       .8mg/liter
                                                          	AU.O my/1"
                                                          	4 Control .
                                                          	^l.8mg/IH
                                                             -a l,2mg/liteir
                                                        	oo.6mg/l«ter-
     0
                           7
                                 y     "I     13    15" 25
                    DAYS:  POST  RELEASE
                                                    31
     group following 360 h of Tordon  o
     sal.cn released per group fdloJng
                                     50

-------
     Dinoseb has a high toxicity to -r.animals  anc, fish.

chronic effects of dinoseb on cutth!:0?* *™s^gely dependent upon water
Woodward (1976), who found that toxicity was ^rgely ^P      lnjrease ,n
quality.  Decreasing the water pH  resulted '" * ^™P™ by Llpschuetz and
dinoseb toxicity to fish.  Similar findings wer; reP°rt*   £H fProm 8.0 to
Cooper  (1961) for technical grade  d.noseb.  Decreasing     P       ^ ^
6.9 increased the toxicity of dinoseb  to "^^.J^,^ the toxicity
High water temperature and h.gh hardness also tena c           Woodward
of dinoseb to fish, but to a  lesser extent than pH (Webb
1976).
                                                          ^	,, and
     TU  nc. u ircn'e   nnHpr  varvinQ conditions 01 H"»  t'-"^*-1 --   '     >
     The 9b-h LCpU  s,  unaer  vaiyiy      dinoseb  for cutthroat trout ana
hardness, ranged  from  0.41 to  1.35 mg/            1976).  Lipschuetz and
from 0.032 to 1.40  mg/L  for  lake  trout  ^wo°      values for  rainbow trout.
Cooper  (1961) observed similar dinoseb  toxicity          ^ ^ pR 6>9 wgs
Their 24-h LC50 at  PH  8.0 was  0.30 mg/L ain°^   ]       atratulus; in water
0.073 mg/L (18°C).  Western  blacknose dace  
-------





<
>
>
o:
Z>

h-
«P
2.

QI
uj
Q_





0-75jjg/L 0-IOOjug/L
100 HT& — 8^ — K 	 X 	 X 	 X 	
11 ^^*\ _s\
QnL\ "QjOO^g/L
i V \

80 1- i200^g/L ;
70r 1 ;*

60 1 1 6
P ' '>
50| ^ \

40 tBOOV '.
1 •! Jfll/ 1 T^ '
1 1 ^y • t
30 -W 1 \(

OO — ll^***^ 1 '
L'lJQ/Lt *

10 - ^. ! 6

Q )L x i i i
; 	 x — x 	 x 	 x 	 x 	 x 	 x 	 x 	 « 	 x


















i i i i i i i i i i
24 72 120 24 72 120 168 216 240
Freshwater Seawater
                  EXPOSURE  TIME  (hours)

Figure 9.   Percent survival of yearling  coho salmon during exposure to
dinoseb (Dow  Premerge) in freshwater and  subsequent survival  upon transfer
to seawater.
    TABLE 19.   SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF  YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED
               TO  DINOSEB IN FRESHWATER AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING
               TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (FEB. 22-MAR.  10, 1977).
Concentration Percent
(yg/L) survival^/ Gill
nominal measured (144-h exposure FW) ATPase^/
Control
25
50
75
100
200
300
500
0
1.1- 12.0
3.0- 11.8
3.1- 13.1
16.6- 61.7
23.0- 65. k
1A1. 0-209.0
241.0-275.2
100
100
100
100
10
0
0
0
2.9
2.7
2.8
3.7,
NTS/
-
-

Percent
survival
(260-h SW)
100
100
100
100
100
-
-

—'Twenty fish exposed per concentration.
2/(Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity; mean of 4 fish.
£/Not measured.

                                   52

-------
Flow-through exposure —
     As dinoseb was found to be extremely toxic to coho salmon and had the
potential for interacting with anadromous salmon because of its use in weed
control along ditches and irrigation canals, it was chosen for study in the
flow-through system.  Following marking (fin excision) and a 5~day accli-
matization period, yearling coho salmon were exposed to dinoseb (Dow-
Premerge) beginning April 19, 1977.  Two days after initiation of the
exposure, the fish in the highest concentration (60 ug/L) began to turn
dark, eat poorly, and die.  The deaths occurred at concentrations con-
siderably lower than had previously caused death under static conditions in
late February.  Whether the smelting of the fish, the use of a flow-through
system or a combination of both was responsible for the greater toxicity is
unknown.  During the first 6 days of exposure to dinoseb, 33% mortality
occurred in the groups receiving 60 yg/L and 8% mortality was noted in the
40-yg/L group.  Two deaths occurred during the sea water challenge in the
group originally exposed to 60 yg/L dinoseb for 144 h (Table 20).  Con-
sidering the poor physical appearance of the 40 and 60 ug/L exposed groups
prior to placing in salt water, it was surprising that there were so few
deaths  (Table 20).  The majority of dark colored fish regained their
silvery coloration during the 10-day seawater challenge.  There were no
mortalities during either toxicant exposure or seawater challenge of the
coho salmon exposed to 10 or 20 yg/L dinoseb for 16 days.  However, all
the fish exposed to 60 yg/L and almost all exposed to 40 ug/L died during
the 16 days of exposure  (Table 20). The gill (Na.K)-stimulated ATPase
activity was unaffected after 6 or 16 day exposures to dinoseb (Table 20).

       TABLE 20.  SURVIVAL OF YEARLING COHO SALMON EXPOSED TO DINOSEB
                  IN FRESHWATER AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL FOLLOWING
                  TRANSFER TO SEAWATER (APR. ig-MAY 16, 1977).
Concentration
(yg/L)
nominal measured
Percent
survi val£/
Gill
ATPase^/
Percent
survival^/
(240-h SW) •
A. 144-h exposure





B





d
T^
Control
10
20
40
60
0.5
7-4- 7.
15.3-17-
38.6
54.5-58.

9
3

3
100
100
100
92
7
(270)
(250)
(250)
(300)
(339)
6.
as
(10)
NT-X
6.
5.

54
36

(10)
(10)

100
100
100
100
90
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
(20)
(20)
(20)
(20)
(20)
. 384 -h exposure
Control
10
20
40
60
/Number of
0.5
6.2- 8.
15.3-17.
30.7-38.
52.9-60.

8
3
6
0
100
100
100
6
0
(270)
(250)
(250)
(300)^
(339)£
6.
NT
6.
NT

81

43


(20)

(20)


100
100
100
NT

.0
.0
.0


(30)
(30)
(39)


fish exposed in parentheses.
-f (Na,K) -stimulated ATPase
activity
/wean with
sample
size in
parentheses.
Q Not measured.
	 r 'P^T»w»f ns4-ax? s~*n x^an 1 ^ •^•x-* -r*^*e?-t-s~\s-tTr- •^^»»"il^^
£/All dead within 11 d.
                                      53

-------
 Crooked C "k 4    ?97
 groups monitored  c«h«
 sHghtly better miration  T
 no sV nlf i^  rd:  e    °e   n mi   a
 groups (Fig   IDA)   Of th    mi9rat
 control  and'2 ?y A d no ebTre  iel
 the 10-and *0-yg/L groups  had  onlv
 group exposed to 60 yg/L for 2?^
 tendency than the  controls
                              int°
                                       h
                                  though
so
                                                        ™* mae   n°
                               the downstrea^ migration of the various
                                  ^ tO 10 P9/L dlnoseb for  '* daYs showed
                                        0'5 °r the 2° ^ 9r°Up'  *
                                        imes were noted for the three

                                                exp°8ed f°r % h'  t
                                                         mi9ratlon>
                                                     o (Fig' 10B)'
                              g  lo)   n  h       J°* 'f^ m'^ra°
dinoseb for A8 h showed a H^l H    i'    Sh exP°sed to ^0 or 60 ug/L
downstream migratfon (Fig  10^  PC±«H ln|:ibitlon ln ave^ percent
occurred, however, between reo ir^H       1e Variation in migration rates
60 yg/L (Table A-5)l  and on?v      2 e>
-------
                   _!__'•  i  i  i  i   I  I  I  I   I  I  I   I  ft-

                      T.    •=>•• inn  of  vearling  cono &diinw»
Figure 10.  Percent  downstream migration  vi  7      203"2I9 coho salmon

exposure to dinoseb  (Dow Premerge).  A.  reP^S®  osure.  B. represents 98-115

released per group following  360 h of  dinos      K     seb exposure except for

coho salmon released per group following  96  h o        ^ ,37 coho sa mon


the 60 pg/L group exposed for 25 h.  .J'^PJo ug/L dinoseb, respectively.

released following 48  h  exposure to  <»u ana o
                                     55

-------
                                                                       TABLE 21.   ACUTE TOXICITY OF OIQUAT TO VARIOUS FISH SPECIES-7
cn
Species
Carasstus auratus
(goldfish)
Esox lucius
(northern pike)
Fundulus s imi 1 is
(killifish)
Ictalurus punctatus
(channel catfish- fry)
1 . punctatus^
Lepomfs cyanellus
(green sunfish)
L. macroch I rus
(bluegi Il-fry)
L. macrochi rus
L. macroch f rus
(f ingerl ings)
L. macrochi rus
L. macrochi rus
L. macrochi rus
Mfcropterus dolomieui
(smal f mouth bass)
M. dolomieu!
M. sal mo Ides
{largemouth bass-fry)
M. sal mo ides
H. salmon ides
Mo rone saxatl 1 is
(striped bass-tarvae)
(f ingerl Ings)
(fry)
(finger lings)
Toxfcity test
static, field
concrete pond
static, field
concrete pond
flowing, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, plastic
pool
static, lab.
static, lab.
static lab.
static, field
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, plastic
pool
static lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab
static, lab
static, lab.
Lf SO2/
(mg/Ll pH
35 (96 h) 8.2
16 (96 h) 8.2
1.0 NTE (48 h)^7'^7
10.0 NTE (111 h)-7 8.4
10.0 NTE (96 h)-7
4.0 NTE-7 8.3-8.9
10.0 NTE (12 d)
4.0 NTE (96 h)
25.0 (30 h) 8.4
19 (48 h)
525 (24 h) 6.9
150 (48 h)
35.0 (96 h) 8.2
9-10 LD,n (97 h)-7
72 (96 h) 7.4
140 (96 h) S.I
0.5 NTE-7 8.3-8.9
4.0 LC|5 (96 h)
10.0 LD)0 (96 h)
2.5 (24 h)
1.0 NTE (96 h)
7.8 (96 h) 8.3
11.0 (48 h)
1.0 (24-96 h)
35.0 (24 h)
10.0 (96 h)
315.0 (24 h)
80.0 (9b h) 8.2
Temperature
48-89°F
48-89°F

23.3-25-8°C
75°F
22-25°C
23.3-25.8°C
24°C
25°C
48-89°F
75°F
25°C
25°C
75°F
22-25°C
22-23°C
25°C

70°F
70°F
21°C
Alkalinity Hardness
(mg/L as CaCO^) Reference
233 230 Gilderhus (1967)
233 280 Gilderhus (1967)
Butler (1965)
75 78 Jones (1962)
Lawrence et al. (1965)
120-189 Yeo (1967)
Hiltibran (196?)
75 78 Jones (1962)
Cope (1966)
40 29 Hughes and Davis (1962)
233 280 Gilderhus (1967)
Lawrence et al. (1965)
22 22
3'2 341 Surber and Pickering
(1962)
120-209 Yeo (1967)
Lawrence et al . (1965)
Hiltibran (1967)

(1962)
(197.)
Hughes (1973)
64 35 Wellborn (1969)

-------
Species
Oncorhynchus kisutch
(coho satmon-yearl ings)
0. tshawytscha
(chinook salmon)
0. tshawytscha
Pimephales promelas
(fathead minnow)
P. promelas
Rasbora hetermorpha
(harlequin fish)
Salmo gairdneri
(rainbow trout )_
S. gairdneri
S. gairdneri

S. gairdneri

S. gairdneri
S. gairdner!
S^ trutta
(brown trout-f ingerlings)
S. trutta

Stizostedion vitreum
(walleye)

Toxicity test
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab
static, lab
flowing, lab.
static, lab.
flowing, lab
static, lab
static, field
concrete pond
static, lab.
flowing, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.
static, lab.

LC 50^/
(mg/L) pH
30 (96 h) 7.4-7.6
29.5 (24 h) 7.4-7.7
28.5 (48 h)
29.0 (48 h)
10.0 NTE (96 h)-7
14 (96 h) 7.4
130 (96 h) 8.2
73-93 (48 h)
5.0 LD)0 (96 h)-7
70 (48 h)
10 NTE-7
11.2 (96 h) 8.2
20.0 (48 h)
10.0 NTE^7 8'°
32.6 (24 h)
20.4 (96 h) 7.5
300 (48 h)|7 7.6-8.0
570 (48 h)^7
2.1 (96 h) 8.2

Temperature
10°C
20°C

75°F
25°C
25°C
20°C
65°F
20°C
55°F
48-89°F
13°C
18.3°C
10 °C
48-89°F

Alkal inity Hardness
(mg/L as CaCOi) Reference
79-82 100-101 Lorz et al. (this
study)
41-71 Bond et al. (I960)
Mui rhead-Thompson
(197D
Lawrence et al. (1965)
22 22 Surber and Pickering
299 379 (1962)
20 Alabaster (1969)
Lawrence et al . (1965)
250 Alabaster (1969)
U.S. Fish 6 Wild.
Service (1963)
233 280 Gi'lderhus (19&7)
Cope (1966)
89.5 Folmar (1976)
100 Simonin 6 Skea (1977)
210-290 Woodiwiss & Fretwell
(1974)
233 280 Gilderhus (1967)

U Concentration of diguat causing 50% mortality of exposed fish in time given
-£l NTE - Wo toxic effect.
5^ Test carried out in seatrater.
j, Approximate threshold toxicity LD1Q for 96 h contact period
   Concentration of Aquacide and Reglone given as 48 H LC50 values, respectively.

-------
LcS'S \5n mudpat:tlcles  •   Woodiwiss  and  Fretwel 1  (1974)  estimated  a  W-h
LC50 of 300 mg/L d.quat for  brown  trout in  relatively  hard  water;  however,
(1^77  of°7n Hhan/|te?-fold h'9her  than  that given  by Simonin  and Skea
rllllrrh rl £ M   , ! ? Wat^ ab°Ut One-ha1f as  hard.   The majority of the
researchers (Table 21) noted that  salmonids had a  96-h LC50 of 11-32  mg/L
d.quat in moderately hard  water.   Bond  et al .  (1960) reported a A8-h  LC50
tL PA h^rcn T!  ™P Cl]ln00k Salmon  whereas  in  °ur  study,  we estimated
>2Q ™*. ?2  K    2° m?/L  f°r C°h° Salmon"  We did n°t  test concent ratio*
steeoer »nT   ^   * ^ °f the toxicitY curve may be considerably
 nd^t.H ?h      9'Ve a Jrer U5° Value"  Surber  and  Pickering (1962)
 ndicated  he importance of  hardness, noting that  the  96-h  LC50 of diquat
fathLd «•     WaS  5 J? 10  tlmeS the l6Vel observed 1"  ^ft  water tests  with
Tathead minnows and bluegill sunfish.
 ucean     n           ^ be tOXic tO fish frV'   Bluegill,  lake chub
d?auat und   ^  -°    5"? frV surviv^ for 3 days  or less in  2.5 mg/L
that rainbow f at '%cond! tlon- (Hlltlbran 1967).   Folmar (1976) reported
diquat?              Y d'Splayed no avoidance of  0.1, ,.0 or 10 mg/L
                                    treatment 0^ Chickahominy Reservoir,
                      ^h   ^ i" dIqUat accum"1ation in the hydrosol .
                                                             adsorbed to
                                erib,    h            d or
voided soon aftor If Hiea      neroicide is believed to be metabolized or
                                                    --  -al -  1965,
                                                           .

                       r
       dqua  (Cab^e   ?0      nd ^hadd|tlona, fish were exposed to
suggested that diquat moved primarilv in th'  T   measured radloact. v. ty
predominantly in the aastro-lni  I  V       plasma and accumulated
water decreased the 1 bj eS    b cIS^ inT*  P1aC6ment °f fiSh ln ^f"
not in the gastro-intestinal t act  and i Vanous /T"5 3nd tlSSUeS> 5" h,
freshwater.                       '  nd increased the radioactivity of the
Experimental Results

Static exposure--
                   nqanth      urr tO yearlin9 coho salmon was
static diquat exposure te  s ^re olac ^ ™ ^ "^  When ^^^
dose dependent manner in !u      P  .   ln seawater, deaths occurred  in a
trations greater !San   o ii/?"??8 °!,yearlln9 coho exposed tb concen-
size was small  there w^ no   ( '9< "' Tab1e 22)' Although our sample
stimulated AT  sel"w  ^^rnf^ °f dlqU9t °n the {Na'K)'
                                       58

-------
3
100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

 10

 0
          rt   n   ^^
          24
   72     120     24      72     120
Freshwater                    Seawater
     EXPOSURE TIME  (hours)
        11.  Percent survival of year, ing.coho
 <"quat  In freshwater and subsequent  surv.val upon transfer
      Concentration
         (mg/L)
 £22lnal      measured
             0,
             1,
            0.23
           .47-0
           .05-1
            4.94
            9.45
           14.7
         19.4-19.7
     49
     06
    Percent
    survival^/
H44-h exposure FW)

     100
     100
     100
     100
     100
     100
      70
      42
 GI11  h/
ATPaseg/

5.0 (4)
NT
NT
4.9 (5)
NT
4.5 (6)
NT
NT
 Percent
 survival
240-h  SW)

   100
   100
   100
   100
    85
    57
    36
    13
                                                         -—•	

     «t» fish exposed per °°™ent*atl°n'. mean with sample size in parentheses.
     ,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of giu, »             ,
                                  59

-------
Flow-through exposure--
     Additional  tests were conducted  with  diquat  because it is  used as a
prophylactic treatment in fish culture and for control  of aquatic vege-
tation, and affects seawater survival  of coho smolts.    Following tank
acclimatization, 150 yearling coho salmon  per tank were exposed to diquat
starting May 13, 1977.  After 144 h and 312 h of  diquat exposure, groups of
yearling coho were transferred to seawater.  Only one fish died  (from the
highest toxicant concentration 3 mg/L for 312 h)  during the seawater
challenge  (Table 23).  The toxicant concentrations of our composite water
samples were close to the desired concentrations.  No apparent effect of
diquat on  the (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity was noted  (Table 23).

    TABLE  23.  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE OF YEARLING COHO SALMON  EXPOSED
               TO DIQUAT  IN FRESHWATER AND THE SUBSEQUENT  SURVIVAL
               FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER.
      Concentration
           (mg/L)
 nominal	   measured
         Percent
         survival^/
                Gill  ATPase^/
                                                                 Percent
                                                                survival
                                                               (268-h S\>0
 A.  144-h  exposure

    Control           0
       0.5           0.58
       1.0           1.07
       2.0           2.04
       3.0           3.06

 B.  312-h  exposure
Control
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
0
0.44-0.58
0.92-1.04
1.91-2.04
2.86-3.06
                                     100
                                     100
                                     100
                                     100
                                     100
                                       100
                                       100
                                       100
                                       100
                                       100
                                                 4.93 (20)

                                                 5.83 (20)

                                                 A.28 (20)
                                 100  (21)2/
                                 100  (19)
                                 100  (20)
                                 100  (20)
                                 100  (20)

                                 (240-h  SW)

                                 100  (20)
                                 100  (29)
                                 100  (20)
                                 100  (31)
                                   95  (19)
 of    fish exposed per concentration.             ^
 —  (Na,K) -stimulated ATPase activity nf n-m . ™      •_..
    parentheses.             «• cavity of gill; mean with sample size in

 ^/Number of fish tested in parentheses.
               n all
f°i
S
/h  *™&   n°
(Tab1e A"7) '
                                           aPPare^ effect
                                            G«nerally,  the
                                                             on  the  condition
                                                             fish  appeared

both the acu   and chron cx osu res
                             H   res
                                                    h          1 teSted'  ^
                                                  The  coho  salmon exposed
                                       60

-------
           A.  285(1
                                                              0.5 mg/liter

                                                               ,0 mg/ liter

                                                              2.0 mg/ liter
                                                              3.0 mg/liter
                                         II     13     (5    19    23    27
                                                                 Control
                                                                 Ml     " H

                                                             ,0 mg/liter
                                                            0.5 mg/liter.
                                                            3.0 ma/liter
                                                            2O mg/iiter
                                       I     13     (5     19    23    27
                    DAYS;   POST  RELEASE

Figure 12.   Percent downstream migration of yearling coho salmon following
exposure to diquat.  A. represents 178-183 coho salmon released per group
following 285 h of diquat exposure.  B.  represents 98-105 coho salmon
released per group following  96 h of diquat  exposure.
                                 61

-------
for 285^ showed a dose-dependent  inhibition  of their migration.   Less
than 30% of the fish exposed to 3  mg/L diquat migrated the 6.4 km down-
stream compared to 63% of the controls.   The  1, 2,  and 3 mg/L groups all
showed significantly less migration than the  controls (P = 0.05).  In
the 96-h exposure groups the percent migration varied from k&% (2 mg/L)
to 12% (controls), but the group responses were not dose-dependent.  The
0.5, 2 and 3 mg/L (96-h exposure)  groups all  exhibited significantly
less migration than the controls.   The controls showed the best migratory
response following both acute and  chronic diquat exposure (Table A-8) .

     Histological examination of diquat-exposed fish showed degenerative
necrosis of the liver, kidneys, and gill lamellae of chronically exposed
coho salmon (Appendix II).  |n acute exposures, however  gill tissues
exhibited the most degeneration although the  liver did show limited
necrosis (Appendix II).

     No bioconcentration of diquat was found  in muscle, kidney, or liver
tissue, although difficulty was encountered in the extraction procedure.
The literature generally indicates that diquat may enter a fish's body
           ^cumulated since the herbicide is metabolized or excreted
             io™aPPeurS fr°m the Water  (Be^ley et al. 19&5, Calderbank
               I   f    6Ver' Gi1derhus  (1967) found diquat residues  in
          6 weeks after treatment with 1.0 ppm.  Calderbank 1972,
             al:°972)   d BerrV et al.  (1975) showed that most   if  not
a
in tish r.,ii-,,ro  f    *  d'qUat  is  USed  for  both  ^atic weed  control  and
in iibn culture  tor  t t-a^t-m^^. 4-  ~£ i^^ ,_••,.,.                        ».«_
                                 bacterial  gill  disease,  further investi"
gation appers wr                      a  9      sease'  urther  nves
exposure ^or In    H  information concerning the effect of reduced
       eva uaHon „? H    °t reC°Very foll^'n9 exposure would permit a
       id?  f ^ c: n^Uat S P°SSible ad— e effects where migrating
                                       62

-------
                                   SECTION VI

                               GENERAL DISCUSSION
 h    We  attested to determine the * h-LCSO  value of  12 -^soluble
 herbicides  to yearling coho salmon.   Th« ^c.ty o ft      P^ ^
 tested varied from <0.1  to >200 mg/L. /crolem  and          ,vel .
 most toxic,  with 96-h LC50 values of 6*™*™™'fa  (dimethyl amine)
 ammonium ethyl  carbamylphosphonate (Krenitej  ana ,       Several
 were apparently non-toxic at concentrations of 200 mg/L.         ^
 researchers  (Hughes and  Davis 1963,  Meehan et al. ™£        H  tempera-
 1976) have  discussed the "-PPortance  of alka1.n.ty, hardnes  , P  ,
 ture, and especially chemical  formulation of  the herb.c.de,
 Parameters  related to observed toxicity to nsnes.

     Most fish  species,  but particularly salmonids  would succumb to

 concentrations  of acrolein or dinoseb if eJP^?a"7)>  When coho salmon
 application  rates (Oregon Weed Control  Handbook  W/)      seawater, few
 Yearlings were  removed from either herbicide  and placed    ^.^ Qf
 additional  deaths occurred.   The (Na  K)  stimu atea
 the gii]s appeared unaffected by e.ther herb.c.de.
     The toxicity  of  some  compounds  may  be         empnas,— — --
chronic exposure.   Sprague_ (1969   andEaton  U9/ >   Jh tQ adequateiy
tance of maintaining  experimental  exposures  '°9   tencc of dinoseb
define lethal  threshold  concentrations,   me H  habitat contamination.
increases the  possibility  of  continuous  aqu*ntrations of 2»0 and 60 ug/L
lr> our dinoseb flow-through exposures, cone           ^f exposure;
resulted in almost  total mortality during tne   ^ ^ g days cause(J no
whereas, in an earlier static experiment, '' ^ulative mortalities in
mortality.  Woodward  (1976) did not  ooserv       ^^ g dgys>  simnarly,
cutthroat trout or  lake  trout exposed to d.no ^ ^ ^ djd nQt cause
'n our study concentrations of 10  and zu My
     Acute exposure of yearling coho salmon to amirru, ^, subsequent

Paraquat produced moderate mortality ^_'y  d  t response, even at
challenge with seawater elicited a f05^^"?.  No statistically ^ _
concentrations that were sublethal in rre       t|muiatcd ATPase activit
significant effect of the herbicides °"  ^j '  d chronically exposed to
°f the gill was observed. Coho salmon """'^     ,nto a small  coastal
diquat exhibited migratory inhibition upon release

stream.
                                                                   . f £ _ JK
     Atrazine, Krenite, 2,4-D, and 2,*,5         ^_ _^
°n smolting of yearling coho salmon,  i.e.     K)_stimuiated ATPase activity.
seawater challenge test, and no effect on  vna,

                                      63

-------
mg/L)?
                                                  the
                                                                 exposure
                                               and
                                           '"
                                                          101  (plclora.
 salon preosl             ov the       " "^^ °  *"'""*
 cide.  No effect on the ?Na K?  *•  ?     St concentrat Ion of the herbi-
 was noted although f sh ^K)-stimul«ed ATPase activity of the gills
 water were not always checked?0"06"^3'10"5 C3USing ^tallty in sea-
did elicit a reduced^atorvT' ^^l the tw° hi^est concentrations
days at 1.2 and 1.8 mg/L) as    esp°nse of chronically exposed fish  (15
exposure groups.  The conceni-0?9    tO contro1  or low Tordon 101
inhibitory effect on migratio   ,°ns    T°rdon 101 that produced the
one would expect to see uti 1 iz'd ' ^f' are considerably greater than
Picloram is extremely persistent In/  '^,d °Peration.  As noted earlier,
following application.     'Stent and could be present for up to a year

     Generally, except  for th  H'
dinoseb and effects of  subletLi ^^ tOX'C effect of acrolein and
and seawater survival,  the herb' C0.ncerntrat!ons of diquat on migration
to affect smolting of yearlina r°h   formulations tested did not appear
water tolerance, (Na,K)-stimulated°A?P     ^ ^ as measured by sea-
 n our study, however,  We test^H   i       activity or migratory tendency-
1'fe history; whereas genetics  VnY °n? ]]fe Sta9e of the salmonids'
may be considerably more affect   ^  'f& Stages' or food resources
study with atrazine.      rrected as noted by Macek et al. (19?6b) In a
     The insecticides DDT anH
to modify salmonid physiology   S,   !°n
exposure to sublethal concent rattn
Peterson 1969> Elson et al    972  u^f
and Johansen 1972, Hatfleld  and Ri  K   \
1969, Symons 1973, 1977,  Warner e  at
Whether the herbicides testeTwouti  i
•nsecticides is unknown.   t doe,
precautions be taken during  the
sheds containing f]sh.   ng  the
                                        (feni trothion)  have been shown
                                             lear"ing ability following
                                             n  '971'  Anderso" and
                                           a"d  Anderson 1972, Hatfield
                                            KeenleV^de 1967  Saunders
                                            and Wi1dish et ^-  W]*> '
                                           resP°ns«  similar to these
                                           h°WeVer>  that appropriate
                                        ion of  any herbicide to water-

-------
                                 SECTION VII

                                 REFERENCES

Alabaster,  J.  S.   ,969.   Survival  of fish in  16ft  herbicides  Insecticides,
      fungicides,  wetting agents and miscellaneous substances.   Int. Pest.

      Control  ll(2):29-35-

AW,  0. H.  and S.  0.  Faust.   ,9*.   Studies on  the fate of 2 £. «d »t.r
      derivatives  in  natural  surface waters.   J. Agnc. rooa
      546.

Anderson, J. M.   1971.   Assessment  of the effects jf Po11«."»
      logy and  behaviour.   Proc.  Roy.  Soc. Ser.  B.  B.ol. Sci . Ml

Anderson, J. M. ,  and  M.  R. Peterson..  1969    DDT:  Sublethal effects on
      brook  trout  nervous  system.   Science:  164-440 441.

Applegate,  V.  C.,  J.  H.  Howe 11 .  A.  E.  Hall Jr.. and M  M. Smith.  1957-
      Toxicity  of  4,346 chemicals  to larval 1™W*™* f   e'
      Fish and  Wildlife Serv.  Spec.  Sci.  Rep.  Fish.  207.  1
Arthur, J. „.   1970.   Chronic effects of  linear
     gent on Gammarus  pseudolimnaeus , Campeloma
     Water Res. 4:251-257-
                                                                     ic acid
A                       '              •  *••„„ r,f 2 4-
Audus, L. J.   1950.  Biological detox.cat.on of 2,4
     in soils:  isolation of an effective organ.sm.
n                                   ,i.      ioAq   Disappearance of atrazine
**. J- A., A.  C. Mathers and A. F. W.ese.  1969.  D'S«PJ   South.  Weed
     propazine  and trifluraline from  so, 1 and water.

     Conf. 22:367. (Abstr.).

Battelle-Northwest Laboratories.   1970.  Degrade JtJ°n J^^1*^  trrigated
     cides in drainage water and accumulation of res^            ^
     with treated water.  Unpublished Report.  R.chland,
Beasley, P. G.f J. M. Lawrence, and H. H.              ^  	
     absorption and distribution of C1  labe ea   q   Contro}  Conf<  ,3.53,.
     Carassius auratus  (Linnaeus).  Proc. ^outn.
     ,  C. R. Jr.f C. B. Schreck, S/^q^ced^onProgram   Proc.
     Angler oriented objectives of an aquatic we
     Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Game F.sh Comm. W
Blrnber, D. L., R. W. Boening and M. L\Sha™'rat
     in yellow perch induced by subtox.c concentrat
     Sci.  76(2):87-90.

                                    65

-------
Blackburn,  R.  D.  and  L. W. Wei don
                                 '
                                          r  *.  ,  r                   •
                                          C°ntrol of southern maid  (Najas
                                           '96°'
                                                        itV of  various

                                                                '
    'bloasUys'wlih^urosoi Sl'anH^^ YuUn9>   1965*  Resu1ts of  preliminary
                    Kurosol SL and d.camba.  Prog. Fish. Cult.  27(1) :*9-5» •
Burchfield,  HP    D  F   i u
     residues!  u.'  s!  l'tft  Sf^.ilh65^ G"ide to the Analysis of pesticide

                      stat;
                                             .
                                                               of
Burnet, A.  M.  R,  1972.   Effect

     stream, New Zealand   N  Z°  |PaJaquat On  invertebrates  In  a  Canterbury
                               '  J'  Mar-  Freshwater  Res.
Burnside, 0.  C. ,  G.  A  Wick

     dicamba, picloram and ^TlBA !'  Fenster"   ]971.   Dissipation of
R M    „                   >3'6  TBA across  ^braska.  Weed  Scl.  19:323-325-
Butler, P. A.  1965    pff

     Weed Conf.  18:576-580? ^  °f  herbicld«  on estuarine  fauna.   Proc.  South

Calderbank, A.   1972   Env-

     diquat and  paraquat  as'aquaUc'herbl ' ^rations  '" the development  of
     9:67-^-                      herb.c.des.  Outlook  on  Agriculture

Calderbank, -A. and P  SI  d

                           '


Campbell,  R.  D.   T   p
     effect of  p, p.
                                                  137*.   The ",„ Vivo"
Carter, L.  1971
                        '  C'  Kearney
                     mode  of  actlSn!
                                                            ,  unpublished
                                                        iquat  and  paraquat
                                                        eds.)  Herbicides:
                                                     Dekker,  Inc.,  New York,
                                    66

-------
 Conte,  F.  P.,  H.  H.  Wagner, J.  Fessler and C.  Gnose.   1966.   Development  of
      osmotic and  ionic regulation in juvenile  coho salmon  Oncorhynchus
      kisutch.   Comp.  Biochem.  Physiol. 18:1-15.

 Cope, 0.  B.   1966.   Contamination of the freshwater ecosystem by  pesticides.
      Pesticides in  the environment and their effects  on  wildlife.   J. Applied
      Ecol.  (Suppl.)  3:33-44.

 Cope, 0.  B.,  E. M.  Wood and G.  H.  Wallen.   1970.   Some chronic effects of
      2,4-D on  the bluegill  (Lepomis macrochirus).   Trans.  Am.  Fish. Soc.
      99:1-12.

 Crosby, D. G.  and H.  0.  Tutass.   1966.  Photodecomposition of  2,4-dichloro-
      phenoxyacetic  acid.  J. Agric.  Food Chem.  14:596-599-
Cutkomp, L. K.f  H.  H.  Yap,  E.  Y.  Cheng  and  R.  B.  Koch.   1971.
     activity  in  fish  tissue  homogenates  and  inhibitory  effects of DDT and
     related compounds.   Chem-Blol.  Interactions  3:439-447-

Davis, J. T. and  W.  S. Hardcastle.   1959-   Biological assay of herbicides
     for fish  toxicity.   Weeds  7=397-404.

Davis, J. T. and  J.  S. Hughes.   1963-   Further observations on^he toxicity
     of commercial  herbicides  to  bluegill sunfish.  Proc. South. Weed Conf.
     16:337-340.

D*Y. B. E., L. S. Jordan, and  R.  T.  Hendrlxon.  1961.  The decomposition of
     amitrole  in  California soils.   Weeds.  9:443-456.
Ernest. R. D.  1971.  The effect of paraquat on fish in a Colorado farm
     pond.  Prog. Fish Cult. 33(1);27-31-

Eaton, J. G.  1970.  chronic malathion toxicity to the bluegill  (Leponis
     JnacrocMrus, Rafinesque).  Water Res. 4:673-684.

E"l-r. R.  ,973.  Annotated MbHography on bio.ogica,  effects^ £.'•  in
     aquatic environments.  U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency.  tc
     EPA-R3-73-6Q7.  Corvallis, Oregon.  287 PP-
Eis'-, R. and M. Wapner.  1975.  Second annotated bibliography  on biolo-
     gical effects of metals in aquatic environments.  U.S.
     prot. Agency Ecol. Res. Ser. EPA-R-3'75-023.
ci                                    .  ,     ,Q79   imDact of forest-based
 lson> P. F.,  J.  w. Saunders.and V. Z.tko.  ^'^     * ,n New Brunswick.
     'ndustries on freshwater-dependent fisn re
     F'sh. Res.  Board.  Can. Tech. Rep.  325:26 pp.
                                    67

-------
Epstein, F.  H.,  A.  I.  Katz and G.  E.  Pickford.   1967.   Sodium and potassium

     activated  adenosine triphosphatase of gills:  role in adaptation of
     teleosts to saltwater.  Science.  156:1245-12^7.


Ernster, L.  R.^R.  Svetterstrom and 0.  Lindberg.   1950.   A method for the

     ScaT'Eqi-     traCSr Ph°Sphate  in bl°l°9ical  material.  Acta. Chem.
Federal Water Pollut.on Control  Administration.   1968.   Water quality

     SeireJiri ofTlYt ^ ""I""31  Technical  Administration to the
           ?nt  u  u* lntenor-   Fed.  Wat.  Poll.  Cont.  Admin. U. S.
         .  Int. Washington,  D.C.  234  pp.
                  Bi,p-           reactions <* rainbow trout fry to nine
                  Bull. Env.ron. Contam.  Toxicol. 15(5) :509-51i*.


                       C:°!ein> DalaP°n'  Dichlobenil, Diquat and Endothal :
                  _ j- *	•  *                    	    " •" • H ***•* •- *•< i iw» »»i i**w »• • • •
           -  .  .  3t toxicity to aquatic orapmUmc   n  c  c: u c \/ti^
     Serv. Tech. Papers 88:1-16.         Or9ari'sms.  U. S. F.sh & Wild.
F°Y' P' r* J976'  Pi^loram and elated compounds.  PP. 777-813    In;
                     . on.  Vol. 2. Marcel Dekker,  Inc., New York,  New  York.
 Freed, V. H. and W. R. Furtfck   iqfii   TK
      Hormolog. 3:3-4.    ILICK-  "So".  The persistence of ami trol  in  soil-



 Gilderhus,  P. A.   1967   Effort- ^^ A-

      organise.  Prog! >," c"t? 2°' "S a"d the""  fC°"
                                  .                 Weeds'   ReP°rt



  """herbicides in pond'wa^lr0"' I^A W\,S'  C°Y'   1%6'   Persistence of four
                          ater.   j.  Am. Water Works Assoc.  58:325-332.

 Haas, R.  C., C. J. Scifres  M  G  M n

      1971.   Occurrence and'persistenr^ %  : ?'  Hahn'  and  G-  °- Hoffman.
      sources.  Weed Res.  11:54-62.         P'cloram  in  grassland water


 Hahan, R. R. , 0. C. Burnside and T  i  •

      Phytotoxicity of dicamba.   W^d Sci?     D!ssiPation and
                                     68

-------
Hall, R. C., C. S. Giam, and M. G. Merkle.  1968.  The photolytic degra-
     dation of picloram.  Weed Res. 8:292-297-
Hall, J. K., M. Pawlus and E. R. Higgins.  1972.  Losses of atrazine in run-
     off water and soil sediment.  J. Environ. Qual. l:172-17b.
Hance, R. J.  1969.  Further observations on the decomposition of herbicides
     in soil.  J. Sci. Food Agric. 20: 14A-1A5.
Hardy, J. |_.  1966.  Effects of Tordon herbicides on aquatic chain organisms.
     Down to Earth.  22(2):11-13.
Harris, C.  I. and T. J. Sheets.  1965-  Persistence of several herbicides
     in the field.  Proc. N. E. Weed Cont. Conf. 19:359-
                                                                      trout
Hatfleld, C. T., and J. M. Anderson.  1972.  Effects of two J"
     the vulnerability of Atlantic salmon  (Salmo salar) parr to
     (Salvelinus fontinalis) predation.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29-27 29.

Hatfidd, C. T., and P. H. Johansen.  1972.  Effects of four insecticides o
     the ablllw of Atlantic salmon parr f*al«, salar) to learn •"- ret.,n
     a simple conditioned response.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29-315 321.

Hatfield, C. T., and L. G. Riche.  1970.   Effects of "rl»1 Jumlthlon"*
     spraying on juvenile Atlantic salmon  (Salmo salar ^ and °f° °kEnviron.
     trout  (Salvelinus fontinalis MitchilU in Newfoundland.  Bull. Env.ron.
     Contam. Toxicol. 5:440-442.
HHtibran, R. C.  1967.  Effects of some herbicides on fertilized fish eggs
     and fry.  Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 96(4) :4l4-4l6.
HMtlbran, R. C., D. Underwood, and J. Fickle   1972.  Fate ^Jiquat in
     the aquatic environment.  Univ. of Illinois, Water Res. Center,
     Rep. No. 52.  45 pp.
H°ar, W. S.   1939.  The weight-length relationship of . the Atlantic salmon.
     J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 4:441-460.
H°PPs, H. B.  1970.  Preparations and reactions of Diazomethane.   Acta.
     3(4) :g.
H°use, W. B., L. H. Goodson, H. M. Gadberry, and K- W.  Dockter.  1967
     Assessment of ecological effects of ext ™*™*°r™^t™t "" De
     herbicides.  Advanced Research Projects Agency. Department °
     ARPA No. 1086.  Kansas City, Missouri.  U. S. Dep. Com. AD
     369 pp.
H««he». J.  S.  1973.  Acute toxicity of 30 chemicals to •trlpedjb...
     (Morone saxatilis) .  Proc. Annu.  Conf. West. Assoc.
     53:399-418.
                                                                    efense.
                                                                °
                                    69

-------
Hughes, J. S, and J. T. Davis.   I962a.   Toxicity of selected herbicides to
     bluegill sunfish.  Proc. La.  Acad.  Sci.  25:86-93.

Hughes, J. S. and J. T. Davis.   1962b.   Comparative toxicity to bluegill
     sunfish and of granular and liquid herbicides.  Conf. S. E. Assoc. Game
     Fish Comm. Proc.  16:319-323.

Hughes, J. S. and J. T. Davis.   1963.  Variations in toxicity to bluegill
     sunfish of phenoxy herbicides.  Weeds ll(l):50-53.

Johnson,  D.  W.  1968.  Pesticides and fishes - A review of selected  litera-
     ture.   Trans.  Amer. Fish.  Soc. 97(4) :398-424.

Johnson,  S   L   R   D.  Ewing and J. A. Llchatowich.  1977-  Characterization
     of gill  tNa+K)-act.vated adenosine triphosphatase from  chinook  salmon,
     Oncorhynchus tshawytscha.  J. Exp. Zool . 199:345-354.

      ;nm; UK  '96?'   T°!erance of  ^e fry of common warm-water  fishes  to
      some chem.cals employed in fish culture.   Proc. Ann.  Conf.  Southeast
      Assoc.  Game  Fish Comm.  16:436-445.
       iln                 R> T<  Hendrixon-   1962.   Chemical  control  of
       1 lamentous green  algae.   Hilgardia.  32(9) : 441 -i,l+3.
                                PP
                                                ln:  P'  C«  Barney and D. D.
      Vol  2  Ma     n                     '  degradation  and mode of action-
      vol. 2. Marcel  Dekker,  Inc.,  New York,  New York.
    24:808-822
                         Y°Ung
                                                       »* ^ DDT in
                                    antic salmon.   J.  Fish.  Res. Board Can.
  Kenaga, E. E.  1
       the
     20:3243-3245.
Koch, R.  B.,  D.  Desaiah   H
     biphenyls:  effect of l-
     Plmephales  promelas. Bull
                                           insecticides.   Biochem.  Pharnacol.


                                               CutkomP«   ^72.   Polychlorlnate
                                     -6  °n  ATPase  activity in fish,
                                     'ron.  Contam.  Toxlcol.  7:87~92.
                                     70

-------
      , J. R,   19^7.   DNBP.   pp.  385~396.  _!TK_ Gunter  Zweig  (ed.) Analytical
      Methods  for Pesticides,  Plant  Growth  Regulators and Food Additives.
      Volume V.  Additional  Principles and  Methods of Analysis.  Academic
      Press, New York, N.Y.

 Lawless, E. W. , R. von Rumber,  and  T. L. Ferguson.   1972.  The pollution
      potential in pesticide manufacturing.  U. S. Environ.  Prot. Agency,
      Washington, D. C.  Pesticide Study Series No. 5, PP- 213 782/3BA. 276 pp.

 Lawrence, J.  M., H. H. Funderburk,  Jr., R. D. Blockburn, and P.  G. Beasley.
      1965.   The status of diquat and paraquat as aquatic herbicides.   Proc.
      Ann. Conf.   Southeast Assoc. Game Fish Comm. 18:247-257-

 Leaden,  T.  p., R.  D.  Campbell  and D. W. Johnson.   197^-   Osmoregulatory
      responses to  DDT and varying salinities in Salmo gairdneri  -  I.  Gill  Na-
      K-ATPase.  Comp. Biochem. Physiol.  49A: 197-205-

 L'pschuetz, M. and  A.  L.  Cooper.  1961.   Toxicity of  2-secondary-butyl-4,6-
      dinitophenol  to  blacknose dace and rainbow trout.   N.  Y. Fish Game J.
 L°°s, M. A.   1976.   Phenoxyalkanoic acids,   pp.  1-128.   _lnj_ P.  C.  Kearney
     and D.  D.  Kaufman  (eds.).   Herbicides:chemistry, degradation, and mode
     °f action.   Vol.  1.  Marcel  Dekker,  Inc.,  New York,  New York.

 Lorz, H. W.  and  B.  P. McPherson.   1977.   Effects  of  copper  and  zinc on smoltifi
     cation  of coho salmon.   U.  S.  Environ.  Prot.  Agency, Ecol . Res. Ser.
     EPA-600/3-77-032.  Corvallis,  Oregon.   62 pp.

 L°rz> H. W., R.  H.  Williams and  C.  A.  Fustish.   1978.  Effect of several
     Petals on smolting in coho  salmon. U. S.  Environ. Prot. Agency,  Ecol.
     Res.  Ser. EPA-600/3-78-090.    Corvallis, Oregon.  85 pp.

 Louder,  D.  E. and E. G. McCoy.   1962.  Preliminary investigations of the use
     °f  aqualin for collecting fishes.  Proc. Ann. 16th. Conf. Southeast.
     Assoc.  Game Fish Comm.  pp. 2^0-242.

L°WrV. 0.  H., N.  J.  Rosebrough, A.  L. Farr and R. J.  Randall. ^ 1951.
     Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.   J.  Biol.  them.
     193:265-275.

Lynn. G. E.   1965.  A review of toxicological information on Tordon
     herbicides.   Down  to  Earty.   20(4):6-8.

     > K. J., M.  A.  Lindberg,  S.  Sauter,  K.  S.  Buxton and P. A.  Costa.   1976a.
    T°xicity of  four pesticides  to water fleas M***^*™?^' Du]uth
    ": S- Environ.  Prot.  Agency,  Ecol.  Res. Ser.  EPA-600/3-76-099, Duluth,
    Mlnn-   58 PP.

    > K> J., K.  S.  Buxton, S.  Sauter,  S.  Gnilka  and  J. W. Dean   19?6b.
      ronlc  toxicity of atrazine to selected aquat.c 'nver£*r*j" !?L
         s.  U.  S.  Environ. Prot.  Agency, Ecol.  Res.  Ser. EPA-600/3 76
         Duluth,  Minn. 50  pp.
                                      71

-------
Marking, L.  L.  and R.  G.  Piper.   1976-  Carbon filter for removing
     therapeutants from hatchery  water.  Prog. Fish-Cult. 38(2):69~72.

Marston, R.  B., D. W.  Schults, T. Shiroyama, and L. V. Snyder.  1968.
     Amitrole concentrations  in creek waters downstream from an aerially
     sprayed watershed sub-basin.   Pestic. Monit. J.. 2 (3) : 123-128.

Matida, Y. ,  Y.  Furuta, H.  Kumada, H. Tanaka, M. Yokote, and S. Kimura.
     1975.  Effects of some herbicides applied in the forest to the fresh-
     water fishes and other aquatic organisms.   1.  Survey on the effects
     of aerially applied sodium chlorate and a mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5~T
     on the stream community.  Bull. Freshwater  Fish. Res. Lab. (Tokoyo)
     25(0:41-53-

Matida, Y., S. Kimura, H. Tanaka, and M. Yokote.   1976.  Effects of some
     herbicides applied in the forest  to the  freshwater  fishes and other
     aquatic organisms.  III.  Experiments  on  the assessment of acute
     toxicity  of  herbicides to aquatic organisms.   Bull. Freshwater  Fish.
     Res. Lab.  (Tokyo) 26 (2): 79-84.

McBride,  R. K. and B. D. Richards.   1975.   The effects of some herbicides
     and  pesticides on sodium uptake  by  isolated perfused gills from the
     carp Cyprinus carpi o.  Comp. Biochem. Physiol.  51 (C) : 105-109.

McKim,  J. W. and  D. A. Benoit.  1971.   Effects of  long-term exposures  to
     copper and  surv.val growth and reproduction of brook trout
      (Salvelinus  fontinalis) .  J. Fish.  Res.  Board Can.  28(5) -.655-662.

Meehan, W.  R.   L.  A   Norrls, and H. S.  Sears.   197*.  Toxicity of  various
     formulates of  2,4-D to salmonids.   J.  Fish.  Res.  Board Can.  31
        n"; of ti96!', N°teS fr°m,June 6> 1961  report.   United States  Depart-
      Pr^imU    !nter'?r- P- 2i*0l  in:. Louder, D.  E.  and E. G.  McCoy.   1962.
      P oi  AnnuY  ^f   ^11°™ °J the "** °f a"ualin  for collecting fishes.
      Proc. Annu.  Conf.  Southeast Assoc. Game Fish Comm.  16:240-242.

      coho L±  o' S\SmiKh>   1968'   '°nic relation in migration  juvenile
      coho salmon  Oncorhynchus kisutch.  Comp. Biochem. Physiol.  26:381-398.
           Conirol'soc5  c'on?  ^ discu?sion °" herbicides taken from the
           control  ;>oc.  Conf., Chicago,  11. Feb  1A  IQAI  ^  r>Ln   ir,.
      D. E. Louder  and  E.  G.  McCoy    1962   P-li       •   P' •    •  — *
      the U<;P nf annairn *    ii    .Iybz>  Preliminary Investigations of
      tne use or aqualm for  collect  on fishes   Prnf-  i
-------
Mount, D.  I. and C. E. Stephan.  1967-  A method for establishing acceptable
     toxican limits for fish-malathion and the butoxyethanol ester of
     2,4-D.  Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 98:185-193-

Muirhead-Thompson.  R. C.  1971.  Pesticides and freshwater fauna.  Academic
     Press, London.  248 pp.

Mullison, W. R.  1970.  Effects of herbicides on water and  its inhabitants.
     Weed Sci. 18(6):738-750.

National Research Council of Canada.  NRC Associate Committee on Scientific
     Criteria.  1974.  Picloram: the effects of its use as a herbicide on
     environmental quality.  Publication No. NRCC 13684 of the Environmental
     Secretariat.  128 pp.

Newman, J.  1970.  Ecological  implications of the use of paraquat and diquat
     as aquatic herbicides.  Chem. and Ind. No. 45=1424-1425.

Newman, J., and J. Way.  1966.  Some ecological observations in the use of
     paraquat and diquat as aquatic herbicides.  Proc. Brit. Weed Contr.
     Conf. 8:582-585.

Newman, A. S., J. R. Thomas, and R. L. Walker.  1952.  Disappearance of 2,4-
     dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid
     from soil. Proc. Soil Sci. Am. 16:21-24.

Newton, M. and J. A. Norgren.   1977-  SiIvicultural chemicals and
     protection of water quality.  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     EPA 910/9-77-036.  Seattle, Wash. 224 pp.

Norris, L. A.  19&7.  Chemical  Brush control and herbicide residues in the
     Forest Environment pp. 103-123-  In: M. Newton (ed.)  Proc.
     Symposium Herbicides and Vegetation Management, Corvallis, Oregon.

Norris, L. A.  1970.  Degradation of herbicides in the forest floor.
     PP- 397-411.  In; C. T. Youngberg and C. B. Davey. (eds.).  Tree Growth
     and Forest Soils.  Oregon  State Univ. Press, Corvallis, Oregon.

Norris, L. A.  1971.  Chemical  brush control-assessing the hazard.  J.
     For. 69(10):715-720.

Norris, L. A.  1978.  Toxic materials in forest streams,   pp. 43-68.
     JJTJ_ Water Resources Research Institute Seminar.  Toxic Material in
     the Aquatic Environment.  Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

Norris, L. A., M. Newton, and J. Zavitkovski.  1966.  Stream contamination
     with Amitrole following brush control operations with Amitrole-T.
     pp. 20-23.  Res. Progr. Rep., West. Weed Contr. Conf.

Norris, L. A. and M.  L. Montgomery.   1975-  Dicamba residues in streams
     after forest spraying.  Bull. Envir.  Contamin and Toxic. 13(1)=1-8.
                                     73

-------
Norris, L. A., M. L. Montgomery, and E.  R.  Johnson.   1977.   The persis-
     tence of 2,4,5-T in a Pacific Northwest forest.   Weed  Sci.  25(5):
Norris, L. A. and D. G. Moore.  1971.   The entry and fate of forest
     chemicals in streams,  pp. 138-158.   In.  J. T.  Krygier and J. D.
     Hall. (eds.).  Forest land uses and  stream environment.  Oregon State
     Univ.  Corvallis, Oregon. 252 pp.


Oregon Weed Control Handbook.  1977.  Compiled by H. M.  Hepworth Oregon
     State Un.versity Extension Service,  Corvallis,  Oregon. 158 pp.

Otto, R. G.  1971.  Effects of salinity on the survival  and growth of

                         " (0ncorh^nchus  kisutch) •   J-  Fish. Res. Board
Pack  D  E.  1967.  Diquat, Paraquat,  p.  397"W» and p.  473^81.  In:
     Guntcr Zwe.g (ed.) Analytical  Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth
                                                                 les and
Richard, J. J., G. A. Junk, M. J. Averv  N  L  «*.*,.•!„„  <   e  c •*    j
     H  J  Sv*>r   1Q75   a  i   •   "very, N. u. Nenrtng, J. S. Fritz and
        ;: .^ec'  19'5-  A"alVSis of various Iowa waters for selected
     pest,c,des:atrazine, DDE. and die,drin.  Pestic. Moni?" "9(3)1
                                                             of amitro,e In
       e          san
J. Flsn? Res? Boardr £&?*£
 ncanne  ialf ishuus
Soc. of Amer., Dallas,  Texas!'
                                                                     .nd
                                                                   pesticides
                                                        "-thyU-ln. salt
                                                          llth Weed Scl.
                  '  *"-;
    of
18.  HTIS PB-2351.57.   90 pp.
                                                                 ) acetic
                                        J. Agric. Food Chem. 21 (2) : 186-192
                                                       ** .. Pond waters,
                                                                     on the
                                            SWi1d' S=r- ReP- No. FWS-LR-/'*

-------
Schwartz, H. J. Jr. 196?.  Microblal degradation of pesticies in aqueous
     solution.  J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 39:1701-1704.

Sergeant, M.,  D. Blazek, J. H. Elder, C. A. Lembi and D.  J. Morre.   1970.
     The toxicity of 2,4-D and picloram herbicides to fish.  Proc.  Ind.ana
     Acad. Sci. 80:114-123.

Simonin, H. A. and J. C. Skea.  1977-  Toxicity of dlquat and cutrine to
     fingerling brown trout.  N. Y. Fish and Game Jour. 24(1):37-45.

Smith, G. E. and B.  Isom.   1967-   Investigations of effects of large-scale
     applications of 2,4-D on aquatic fauna and water quality.   Pestic.
     Monit. J.  1:16-21.

Southerland  G  L    1964.   3-Amino-s-Triazole.  pp. 639-642.  JJTJ. Gunter
     Zwetg  (edJ Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators,
     and Food Additives.  Volume IV, Herbicides.  Academic Press. New York.

Sprague  J. B.  1969.  Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish - I.
     Bioassay methods for acute toxicity.  Water Res. 3:793-821.

St. Amant,  J. A., W. C.  Johnson, and M. JWhalls.  1964.  Aqualinasa
     fish toxicant.  Prog.  Fish-Cult. 26(2):84-88.

Sund, K. A.   1956.   Residual  activity of  3-amino-l,2,4-triazole  in soils.
     J. Agr.  Food Chem.  4:57-60.

Surber,  E.  W. and G. H.  Pickering.   1962.  Acute toxicity of endothal,
     diquat,  hyamine, dalapon, and  silvex to  fish. Prog. Fish Cult.
     24:164-171-

Symons   P   E   K.   1973-  Behavior  of young Atlantic salmon  (Salmo salar)
     exposed  to or  force-fed  fenitrothion, an organophosphate insecticide.
     J.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Can. 30(5):651-655-

Symons,  P.  E.  K.   1977.  Dispersal  and  toxicology  of  the insecticide  feni-
     trothion;  predicting  hazards  of forest spraying.  Residue  Res. 68.
     1-6.

Tarrant,  R. F., and  L.  A.  Norris.   1967.   Residues of herbicides and  diesel
     oil  carriers  in forest water,   pp. 81-88.  jni Proc.  Symp.  Herb.  ,n
     Veg. Manage.  Corvallis,  Oregon.

Teasley,  J.  I.  and  P. W. Williams.   1969.  The  degradation of four esters
     of  chlorophenoxyalkyl  acids used  in  aquatic weed control    Unpublished
     manuscript.   Southeast Water  Control  Laboratory  USD   Athens, Georg.a.
     Cited  ITK.E.  E. Kenaga.   1974.  Down to  Earth.  30(3):19-25.

Templeman,  W.  G.   1955-  The  use of plant growth  substances.  Ann. Appl.  Biol
     42:162-173-
                                       75

-------
Trichell, D. W. , H. L. Morton and M. G. Merkle.  1968.  Loss of herbicides
     in runoff water.  Weed Sci. 1 6       -
Tweedy, B. G. and L. D. Houseworth.  1976.  Miscellaneous herbicides,  pp.
     815-833.  In: P. C. Kearney and D. D. Kaufman (eds.).  Herbicides:
     chemistry, degradation and mode of action.  Vol. 2. Marcel Dekker,  Inc.,
     New York, New York.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service.  1963.  Pesticide-wildlife studies,
     a review of  Fish and Wildlife Service investigations during 1961 and
     1962.   Fish  Circ.  16?.

Velsicol Chemical Corp.  1967-  Banvel D. General Bulletin No. 521-2.

Wagner, H. H. 197^a.  Photoperiod and  temperature regulation of smelting
     in steelhead trout  (Salmo gairdneri) .  Can. J.  Zool. 52 (2) :219~234.

Wagner, H. H. 1974b.  Seawater adaptation  independent of  photoperiod  in
     steelhead trout  (Salmo gairdneri). Can. J.  Zool. 52 (7) :805-8l 2.

Walker, C. R.  1964.   Simazine and other  s-triazine  compounds  as aquatic
     herbicides  in  fish habitats.  Weeds  12 (2) : 1 3^-1 39.

Warner, R. E. , K. K.  Peterson, and L.  Borgman.   1966.   Behavioural
     pathology  in fish:  A  quantitative study of  sublethal pesticide  toxi-
     cation. J.  Appl .  Ecol .  3:223-2^7.

 Webb,  W.  E.   1951-   Toxicity  of  certain  pesticides  in  fish.   Idaho Fish  and
      Game Department,  p. 118.  In: M.  Lipschuetz and A.  L.  Cooper    1961.
     Toxicity of 2-secondary-butyl-/t,6-dinitrophenol to blacknose  dace
      and  rainbow trout.  N.  Y.  Fish  Game  J.  8(2) : 1 10-1 21 .

 Wellborn, T  L.  Jr. 1969.   The toxicity of nine therapeutic and herbicidal
      compounds  to striped bass.   Prog. Fish-Cult.  31(l):2?-32.

 Wildish,  D.  J.,  W.  G. Carson, T.  Cunningham,  and N.  J.  Lister   1971
      AHlnH?9^?1  effer-S °V°me organophosphate  insecticides to
      Atlantic salmon.  Fish.  Res. Board Can.  MS Rep. 1157:22 pp.

 WMS°andDDi!;hlohd  n ?r BondV969'  The effects of the herbicides Diquat*
      and D  chlobeml (Casoron^)  on pond invertebrates.   Part  1.  Acute
      toxicity.   Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 98(3)^38-^3
                                        76

-------
                      Toxicitv of the herbicides dinoseb and picloram  to

                   }saI™ ll^i, .ndl.k.  trout

    J. Fish. Res.  Board Can.  33:1671-1676.
     Papers. 97:1-6.

Yeo,  R.  R.  1967.  Dissipation of diqu-t .nd Pjr.quatt and effects on
     aquatic weeds and  fish.  Weeds.  15(1) :«-A6.

v        r  R   nH R  w  Meikle   1972.  Residues of picloram acquired by

                                                 r               "
                                                                 ,
              onn^ent, quaHtv.  Publ.e-tion No. NRCC ,3684 of
     the Environmental  Secretariat.
                                  .   Adenosine tri phosphatase activity in
 •7      i,  e    A i   R  MrLain   1972.  Changes in gill  adenosine-triphos-
                                 ---s: STSTK aar-
     29:167-171.

                                     Gill  ATPase activity  related to parr-
     456:955-965-

 7  .        j • i   c^rm^   iq72a  Miscellaneous  Pesticides -  Triazines.  pp.
 Zweig, G. and J.  Sherma.  197fa.  "'5Ve'  ,   •   , Methods for Pesticides,

     ^-f ^o^uU^r^loo/Ad It! tL.  Vo,»e V,. Oas Chromato-

     graphic Analysis.  Academic  Press.  New York.
    i9  0. ana 0
                                  .  G.. Chrc-to.r.phle An.lv..,.

      Press.  New York.
                                    77

-------
                        Additional  References  Not  Cited

Akhavein  A.  and D  Linscott.   1968.   The dipyridylium herbicides paraquat
     and diquat.  Residue review.   23:97-145.


Albaster, J  S.   1957.   The toxicity  of certain weedkillers to fruit.
     Proc. 3rd.  Brit.  Weed Control  Conf.  p.  807-808.


Albaster  J  S.   1959    Toxicity of weedkillers, algicides and fungicides
     to trout.  Proc.  4th. Brit. Contr. Conf.  2 pp.


            ; [;Underburk>.J- Lawrence and D.  Davis.   1964.  Persistence of
            and paraquat ,n pools and ponds.   Proc.  So. Weed Conf. 17:308-
     2nhM-                        -
     99(1):?-12            (Lepomis macrochirus) .   Trans.  Am. Fish. Soc.
                                                                       Of
     Jnsecticid;   he  h
     of SaK-A^aL tn r
                                                 r.   1972.   Organochlorine
                                Po1ychlor'^ted biphenyl  (PCB)  Inhibition
     Tech.
               .  No.  7.
                                         En9lneer' Vi^burg, Mississippi.
Hawkes, C.  L.  and L.  A.  Morris    1Q77

     Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-Sloxin   ?CDD)
     Soc. 106(6) -.641-645.
                                                          lty °f 2'3'7'8"
                                                   trout.  Trans. Am. Fish
     Trans. lilis Acad  Sc   65
                                     1' °f aden°Sine trlpho.ph.te by blue-

                                              * ^'^ *"* ^^ derivatiV6S'
Howe, D.  J.  T.,  and N.  Wright.   196^    Th»
     Proc.  18th  N.Z.  Weed  and  Pest  Conf  p.
                                                    °f
                                                                *"*
 Hughes, J. S. and J. T. Davis   1Q62   M H-
     parts per million of bluealll tmf" k!" J°'france ^mlts reported  in
     -M9S2.  La. wild. andVuh."^ ^^'^ %** •""•"••
                                  78

-------
Juntunen, E. T.,  and L. A. Morris.  1972.  Field application of herbicides-
     avoiding danger to fish.  Oreg. Agric. Exp. Stat.  Spec. Kept.  354.
     26 pp.

Lawrence, J. M.  1962.  Aquatic herbicide data. U. S. Dept.  of Agric.
     Agriculture Handbook No. 231-  133 pp.

Loeb, H. A., and W. H. Kelly.  19*3.  Acute or oral  toxicity of 1,496
     chemicals force-fed to carp. U. S. Dept.  Interior. Fish and Wild.  Ser.
     Spec. Scient. Rept. Fish No. 471. 12** pp.

May, B. E., R. S. Hestand and J. M. VanDyke.   1973.   Comparative effects of
     diquat plus copper sulfate on aquatic organisms.  Weed Sci. 21(3):
     249-252.

Meyer, F. A. 1966.  Aquatic plant control, p. 70-95.   \nt_ A. Calhoun, (ed.).
     Inland Fisheries management.  Calif. Dept. Fish and Game.

Norris, L. A. and R. A. Miller.   197^.  The toxicity of 2,3,7-8-Tetra
     chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (TCDD)  in guppies Poecilia reticulatus Peters).
     Bull. Envir. Contam. andToxicol. 12(l):76-80.

Pimentel, D.   1971.  Ecological effects of pesticides on non-target species.
     Exec. Office of the President.  Office of Science and Technology.
     Wash. D.C.  220 pp.

Plumb, T. R., L.  A. Norris, and M. L. Montgomery.  1977-  Persistence  of
     2,4-D and 2,4,5-T  in chaparral soil and vegetation.  Bull. Environ.
     Contam. andToxicol. 17(l):l-l8.

Rawls, C. K.   1965.  Field tests of herbicide  toxicity to certain estuarine
     animals.  Chesapeake Sci. 6(3):150-161.

Schultz, D. P., and E. W. Whitney.  197*.  Monitoring 2,4-D residues at
     Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.  Pestic.  Monit. J. 7(3/4):
     146-152.

Snow, J. R.  1948.  A preliminary study of the toxicity of 2,4-D to pond
     fishes and  its effectiveness  in the control of emergent species of pond
     weeds. MSc thesis Auburn Univ. 87 PP-» Auburn,  Ala.

Walker, C. R.  1971.  The toxicological effects of herbicides and weed
     control on fish and other organisms  in the aquatic ecosystems.  Proc.
     Eur. Weed. Res. Counc.  Int.  Symp. Aquatic Weed. 3:119-126.

Way, J., J. Newman, N. Moore and  F. Knoggs.   1971-  Some ecological effects
     of the use of paraquat  for  the control of weeds in small lakes.  J.
     Appl. Ecol. 8:509-532.

Yokote, M., S. Kimura,  H. Kumada  and Y. Matida.   1976.  Effects of some
     herbicides applied  in the forest  to  the  freshwater fishes and other
     aquatic organisms.   IV. Experiments on the assessment of acute and
     subacute  toxicities of  2,4,5-T to the rainbow trout.   Bull. Freshwater
     Fish. Res.  Lab.  (Tovko) 26(2):85-93-


                                     79

-------
APPENDIX I.  METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC HERBICIDES.

AMITROLE-T

1.   Summary of method:  The method is an adaptation of Southerland
     (1964).  Amlnotriazole is removed from water by adsorption on an
     ion exchange resin.  The eluate from the resin is decolorized with
     activated charcoal.  N-(1-Naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride
     is used to form a chromophoric moiety which is measured in a
     colorimeter at 460 nmJ

2.   Reagents:  Dowex 50W-X8

               3-amino-s-triazole

               Sulfuric Acid, reagent grade (concentrated, 75% and 0.75%)

               Sodium nitrite, reagent grade (0.5% aqueous solution,
                    prepare fresh daily)

               Sulfamic acid, reagent grade (5-0% aqueous solution,
                    prepare fresh daily)

               N-(l-Naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride,
                    reagent grade (1.0% aqueous solution, prepare
                    fresh daily)

               Charcoal, activiated ("Darco" G-60)

               Ammonium hydroxide, reagent grade, 2 Normal so.lution

3.   Apparatus:     Widemouth plastic bottles,  500 mL (sample containers)

                    Magnetic stirrers and stir bars
                    Chromatographic columns
                    Hot plates
                    Colorimeter
                    Timer
                    Suction flask (500 mL)
                    Sintered glass funnels (medium porosity)
                    Beakers (600, 400 & 100 mL)
                    Erlenmeyer flasks (50 mL)
                    Volumetric flasks (25 ml)
                    Pi pet
                    Glass beads (3 mm)
                                    81

-------
l\.   Procedure:


a.
Resin adsorption and desorption of aminotriazole:  Measure 200 ml of

?5S^^
beaker infn th»  ?    ™i J'™* the Sample and resi" fr°™ 'he
      '      -'
    beaker infn th»
    5±i,'3£ s-'s ra^^'^-i,^0^ .r^s
           reSi" """ 2°° mL °f 2N TOnlura MrexlS I nto a MO mL
    beaker
''   £;r"S= ?s zxxsfnsxisii s.
                                        with
    SSI's" :         ~
                                             » • ~ «•
c.   Color development: Transfer a 5 ml al Inuni- nf    ,  -
    erlenmeyer, add 3 mL concentr=,,-^  ,'lc^ot: ot sample into a 50 mL

    bath. Add 10 drops ofTS sodium   I"''"    * 9nd C°o1  'n an ice
    add 10 drops of 5.0% sulfamic   'd    ^lte! and swirl; after 10 min,

    drops 1.0% N-(l-Naphthyl) ethylened'- ^i* Aftet" ]°  m'n add 10
    Read against a reagent blank at i*An ^min® °!hydrochlor1de and swirl.
    standard curve for aminotMazoU d ? W!thln 30 min.  Using a
    triazole in the 5 mL aHquo?    determine the amount of 3-aml.no-s-

ATRAZINE


1.   Summary of method: This method is ha<;Pd «  7  •
    Atrazine is extracted from water with ™of-h i   9Land Sherma ^972a).
    carried out using a chloride specific ml/  "? Chl°rlde'  A"^ysls is
    graphic system.           spec.tic microcoulometric gas chromato-


2.   Reagents:   Methylene chloride, reagent grade


             Methanol, reagent grade


3-   Apparatus:    Glass jars with teflon-lined caps

               rt^.r!'°7 fV"nels (500 mL)
                Volumetric flasks
                                          ,  or

                   halogen ti7r;;i;;UceiriCr°COUl0metriC detector


                            82

-------
a.
Procedure:

Extraction:  Measure AOO ml of water sample into 500 ml separatory
funnel fitted with teflon stopcock.  Shake sample with three successive
75 mL portions of methylene chloride combining the three portions in
a 250 mL beaker.  Evaporate the methylene chloride to near dryness
using a stream of nitrogen.  Add 20 mL methanol and evaporate to
near dryness again to ensure all methylene chloride is removed.

Transfer to volumetric flask with methanol.

Gas Chromatography:  Gas chromatograph parameters:

Coulometer settings:      250 ft, 250 mV bias, low gain mode.
     Column:


Temperatures

     Column

     Inlet

     Transfer 1ine

     Combustion furnace:

     Gas flows:



     Recorder:
     Retention time of
     atrazine:
                         4 mm I.D. x 1.2 m glass packed with 5%
                         OV-1 on 80/100 Gas Chrom Q.
                         175°C

                         205°C

                         225°C

                         800°C

                         Carrier gas 60 ml nitrogen/min,
                         oxygen 50 mL/min.
                         Sweep gas 20 mL nitrogen/min.

                         0.1  mV/in (0.04 mV/cm),  1/2  in/min
                         (1.27 cm/min)  chart speed.   Equipped
                         with a disc integrator.


                         2.8  min.
     The amount of atrazine in the samples is determined by injecting an
     aliquot of the methanol solution into the gas chromatograph.   Compare
     peak chart areas with areas for known amounts of atrazine.

DICAMBA, PICLORAM, 2,4-D, and 2,4,5-T

Residues in water

 '.   Summary of method:   Samples are collected and stabilized  with  sodium
     hydroxide.  The samples are adjusted to a pH <2,  extracted  with
     ether and alkylated to form the methyl  ester.  Detection  and quantification
     >s accomplished using microcoulometric gas chromatography (MCGC)  in
     the halogen mode.
                                     83

-------
     Reagents:
3.    Apparatus

               Diethyl  ether  (distilled over sodium)
               Sulfuric acid  (concentrated, reagent)
               Sodium hydroxide  (reagent)
               Diazomethane
               BF^-methanol

               Widemouth plastic bottles (500 ml)

               Beakers^ fU"ne1S f'tted W'th Tefl°n st°Pcocks
               Volumetric flasks
               Graduated cyl inder
               Gas  chromatograph - MicroTek 2000 MF, or equivalent
               with Dohrman model C200B microcoulometric detector
               with halogen titration cell.
Procedure:
           us 2
laboratory and stored at
                                         *
                                                      --
                                              transP°>-ted  to  the
                                :L2°:,stor sample to
Extract with three  successive alinnn,   f ^""^ated  sulfuric acid.
ether extracts  are  col lee ed in a '250 m°L \^ °°0' 8°'  6°  mL) '  The
less than 20 ml.  The  ether llv.r u     ^*r'  9nd evaP°>-ated to
water and into  a  30 mL beJke  * Thl r^-f " W deC3nted 9WaY  from anY
three small  aliquots of "he 'addino th      ^^ ls rinsed with
extract is evaporated  to 2 ml wl th I  ^ rt™["3* to the beaker.  The
concentrated extract Is transferrrf  ^ll*™ °f dr"Y nitro9^n.  This
a 10 ml volumetric  flask  carlfuHv H    *™"  aUqU°tS °f ether  lnto
evaporated to dryness  on'alialh evap'^or?9 "^ *"**
     and 2,4,5-T may be formed
     or a BF3-methanol  reagent

     Gas chromatography:

     Gas chromatography parameters:

         Coulometer settings:

         Co 1 umn:
                                                       are  formed
                                                   6Sters of 2'^D
                                                                1370)
                                 n  yen m\, k.
                                 w,  250 mV bias,  low  gain mode.

-------
           Tempe/atures

           Column


           Inlet

           Transfer line:

           Combustion  furnace:

           Gas  flow:



           Recorder:
          Retention  time  of
          methyl esters:
                                      -T, and picloram
                               200°C for 2,4-D,  2
                               185°C for dicamba.

                               205°C

                               225°C

                               825°C
                               Carrier  gas  60  ml  ni trogen/min,
                               Oxygen 50  mL/min.
                               Sweep gas  21  ml ni trogen/min.

                               0.1  mV/in  (O.OkmM/cm)  1/2  in/min
                               (1.27 cm/min),  chart speed.  Equipped
                               with a disc  integrator.
                               dicamba
                               2,4-D
                               2.4,5-T
                               picloram
                                    2.0 min (185°C)
                                    2.0 min (200°C)
                                    3.0 min (200°C)
                                    5.5 min (200°C)
     The amount of herbicide  in  the  samples  is determined by  injecting an
     aliquot of sample  solution  in the gas chromatograph and  comparing
     peak chart areas with areas  for known amounts of the herbicide
     injected.

PICLORAM, 2,4-D, AND 2,4,5~T
.Residues in Fish
                                                                          urn
Summary of method:  Whole body fish samples are digested with potass.
hydroxide and centrifuged.  The supernate is adjusted to pH <2,
extracted with ether and alkylated to form the methyl ester.  Detection
and quantification is accomplished using microcoulometric gas chromato-
graphy (MCGC) in the halogen mode.
     Reagents:
     Apparatus:
i n

 Diethyl  ether (distilled  over  sodium)
 Sulfuric acid (concentrated,  reagent)
 Potassium hydroxide  (reagent)
 Diazomethane
 95%  ethanol

 Separatory funnels fitted with  teflon  stopcocks
 Round-bottom boiling  flask  (250 ml)
 Condenser (West,  2hAO 5)
 Volumetric flask,  10  ml
                                        85

-------
                    Graduated cylinder,  100 ml
                    Heating mantle, 250  ml
                    Centrifuge  (International Model U or equivalent)
                    Centrifuge  bottles,  250 ml
                    Beakers
                    Flash  evaporator  (CaLab Model  5101 or equivalent)
                    Tissue grinder  (Tek  Mar Model  SDT or equivalent)
                    Gas  chromatograph  -  MicroTek  2000 MF, or  equivalent,
                        with Dohrmann model  C200B microcoulometric
                        detector with halogen  titration cell.
     Procedure:
a.   Sample extraction:   Weigh sample,  cut in  small  pieces  and  place in
     250 ml round-bottom boiling flask.   Add 50 ml of 35% ethanol,  grind
     with tissue grinder.  Add 100 ml 50% potassium hydroxide in water
     solution, place in  a heating mantle and attach a reflux condenser.
     Reflux for one hour.  Cool, transfer contents to centrifuge bottle
     and centrifuge at 2000 rpm for 20 min.   Decant into separatory
     funnel, acidffy to  
-------
 **•   Procedure:

 a.   Sample collection:  Water samples are collected in 500 mL, wide-
      mouth, glass bottles which contain 3 mL of 50% sodium hydroxide.
      The samples are mixed to ensure complete hydrolysis of any DNBP
      which may be present.  The samples are transported to the laboratory
      and stored at 2°C.

 b.   Sample extraction:  Transfer 200 mL of water sample to a 500 mL
      separatory funnel.  Adjust to pH < 2 with concentrated sulfuric
      acid.  The acidified sample is extracted with three successive
      aliquots of ether (100,  80, 60 mL).   The ether extracts are collected
      in a 250 mL beaker,  evaporated to less than 20 mL.   The ether layer
      is carefully decanted away from any water into a  30 mL beaker.   The
      residual  extract is  rinsed with three small aliquots of ether adding
      the rinsings to the  beaker.  The extract is evaporated to 2 mL with
      a  stream of dry nitrogen.   This concentrated extract is transferred
      with small  aliquots  of ether into a  10 mL volumetric flask,  decanting
      away any water  and evaporated to dryness on a flash evaporator.

 c.    Derivation:   The methyl  ester of DNBP is formed using an  ethereal
      diazomethane reagent (Hopps 1970).

 d.    Gas chromatography:      Gas  chromatograph  parameters:

           Column:             A  mm I.D. x  1.2 m  glass, packed  with  equal
                              amounts of 6% 0V 210 and b% SE 30 on
                              80-100 Gas Chrom Q.

           Temperatures

           Column              180°C

           Inlet               200QC

           Gas  flow:           Carrier gas  80 mL  nitrogen/min.

           Recorder:           0.1 mV/in (0.04mV/cm), 1/2  in/min  (l.27cm/min)
                              chart  speed.

          Retention time of                 '
          DNBP methyl ester:  3-5 min.

     The amount of DNBP in the samples is determined by injecting an
     aliquot of sample solution in the gas chromatograph and comparing
     peak hefghts with peak_heights for known amounts of injected DNBP.

Residues in Fish

1.    Summary of Method:  The method is based on Lane (1967) and Zweig and
     Sherma (1972b).   Whole body fish samples are digested with potassium
     hydroxide and centrifuged.   The supernate is adjusted to pH <2,
     extracted with benezene and alkylated  to form the  methyl  ester.   The
     ester is cleaned up with  an alumina column.   Detection and quantification
     is  accomplished  using electron-capture gas chromatography.

                                      87

-------
    Reagents:
    Apparatus
    Procedure
Diethyl  ether (distilled over sodium)
Benzene (Burdick & Johnson,  Distilled in Glass TM)
Potassium hydroxide (reagent)
Sulfuric acid (concentrated, reagent)
Alumina, activated (Fisher A-5AO)
Diazomethane
n-Hexane (distilled over sodium)
Acetone (Burdick & Jackson,  Distilled in Glass TM)

Separatory funnels fitted with teflon stopcocks
Beakers
Volumetric flasks
Graduated cylinders
Pipet, Pasteur, disposable
Heating mantle, 250 mL
Round-bottom boiling flask
Condenser (West, 2VAO 5)
Centrifuge  (International Model
Centrifuge bottles, 250 mL
Tissue grinder  (Tek Mar Model SDT or equivalent)
Gas chromatograph  (Varian Model 1200 or equivalent
     with scandium E.C. detector)
Flash evaporator  (CaLab Model 5101 or equivalent)
                                              (250 ml)

                                                   U or equivalent)
    Sample extraction:  Weigh sample, cut in small pieces and place in
    250 ml round-bottom boiling flask.  Add 50 mL of 95* ethanol , grind
    with tissue grinder.  Add 100 mL 50* potassium hydroxide in water
    solution, p ace in a heating mantle and attach a reflux condenser.
    Reflux for 1 hour   Cool, transfer contents to centrifuge bottle and
    centrifuge at 2000 rpm for 20 min.  Decant into separatory funnel,
    acidify with concentrated sulfuric acid, and extract with three 75 mL
      onnrf                           solution of diazomethane
     (Hopps  1970) drop by drop until the yellow color persists.  Swirl  the
     J ±r9e?h ly',al!°W t°1stand  10 min' and evaporate just to dryness.
     Prepare the alumina column by  tamping a plug of glass wool
     • nto  a  d.sposaole Pasteur pipet and pour in a  1-in layer of activated
     Dortin3;  fT1^ th^.methylat-d  ^sidue to the column with  two  3 mL
     port.ons of hexane.  Discard  the hexane eluate.  Elute the DNBP
                        mL ethyl  ether-  coiiect
     waterhanalys?s?PhY  *"*  quantl f '"tion  are  identical with  the  method for
D10.UAT AND PARAQUAT


-------
able to determine concentrations of diquat by direct readings  of  the water
at 310 nm and for paraquat at 256 nm.   Concentration was  determined from a
standard curve.

-------
APPENDIX II.  EFFECT OF VARIOUS HERBICIDES  ON  HISTOLOGY  OF YEARLING COHO
SALMON.  BY DR.  J.  D. HENDRICKS, OREGON STATE  UNIVERSITY.

ACROLEIN

Control t 1M h (3 fish) - All  tissues were  normal.

50 yg/L acrolein. UA h (3 fish) - The livers  had occasional  exfoliated,
necrotic cells, but were otherwise normal.   One of the kidneys was normal,
one had extensive vacuolation of the collecting duct cells, while the other
had protein precipitate and cellular debris present in Bowman's capsule and
various tubular regions.  Both hypertrophy and hyperplasia were seen in the
gill epithelium of fish examined.

 100 yg/L acrolein, Mt  h  (3 fish) - Most of the liver cells were delineated
and separate from adjacent ones, some were necrotic.  All the kidneys had
considerable debris  and precipitate  in tubule  lumens, and one kidney had
extensive  necrosis of  both segments of the proximal tubule.  All kidneys
were engorged with blood.  The  gill epithelium from all fish was totally
 destroyed,  necrotic  and  sloughed.  Two hearts were normal.  A section of
esophagus  exhibited  massive necrosis of all k  tunics.

 AMITROLE-T

 Control,  l¥t  h  (3  fish)  - There was  extensive  peripheral,  coagulative
 necros.s  due  to  bile spillage and  several  foci of  peribiliary necrosis
 within the substance of the  liver.   The  remaining  liver cells were normal,
 so I  assume both of these lesions  were the result  of  poor post-mortem
 handlmg  of the  l.vers.  K.dney and gill  tissues  were  normal.

 100 mg/L  Amitrole-T, |M, h (1 fish)_-  All  liver  cells showed  either hydropic
 degeneration or  coagulative  necrosis.   The necrosis was diffuse;  approxi-
 mately 25/c of the parenchymal cells were affected.  There was  extensive
 coagulative necros.s of all  regions of the nephrons  as  well  as  most of the
 hematopo.et.c tissue of the  kidney.  The lamellar epithelium of the gills
 Umen^'o ^h Ta"ateJ fr°m the under1Ying pillar cells  on  many of the
 was severe   H Jh   V*    ^ ^^ ™  theSe 3 tissues> this treatment
 was severe and the changes would be incompatible with survival.


                                   ' ChangeS in the liver wer* of the same
tvoe^Snlh''0!^60  h  (3  f'Sh)  '  ChangeS  in  the  liver wer*  of  the same
con!lH^riMMJ  PPm  SXpOSure  but  not  as extensive.   One  of  the fish had
considerable diffuse coagulative necrosis of liver  cells,  but  the others
                                     	• -  — •  ii.^,i  V.&I13,  UUL  L11C U LI 1C I
                     hydropic degeneration.   Kidneys  exhibited similar
extens'     E •  h T     tubules  and hematopoietic tissue,  but  not quite as
normal i!L,i lal «  L*\ C&]]S ofAthe 9Hls  were hypertrophied,  disrupting
treatment   h, T  tect"re'  A1though  not  as severe as the previous
treatment, these t.ssue changes would probably not permit  longtime survival.
                                       90

-------
 ATRAZINE (AATREX)

 15 mg/L AAtrex,  140 h  (3 fish)- The livers and kidneys of these fish were
 normal.  There was hypertrophy of the gill epithelium in two of the fish,
 while the third  had several large aneurisms at the base of the filaments.

 DICAMBA (BANVEL  D)

 100 mq/L. dicamba. 1M h (5 fish) - All livers exhibited foci  of peripheral
 and/or peribiliary bile necrosis but were otherwise normal.   Kidneys and
 gills were also normal in these fish.   The experimental  treatment had
 little if any effect on the tissues examined.

 PARAQUAT

 100 mg/L paraquat. 120 h (4 fish)  - All  the livers exhibited  a low grade
 hydropic degeneration, particularly in centrolobular regions  and  occasionally
 in foci  of peribiliary necrosis.  One  kidney was  normal,  the  other 3 had
 necrotic cells in the first and second proximal  tubules.   Two of  the fish
 had gills  from which nearly all the epithelium had been  sloughed;  where  it
 remained,  the epithelium was degenerate  or necrotic.   The other two fish had
 less  severe gill  lesions.

 ESTERON  [BRUSH KILLER (2,^-D + 2,4,5'T PGBE ESTER)]

 Control. 96 h (5  fry)—/-  Livers and kidneys were  normal on all  these fish,
 but the  gills were similar  to the  experimentals with  regard to chloride  cell
 hyptertrophy.  This  response may be the  result of something other  than the
 Esteron  treatment.  Its significance is not clear.

 J2QO  uq/L  Esteron. 28  h (5  fry)-/-  Some  peribiliary  necrosis  was present  in
 all  livers  and some  diffuse cellular degeneration  was  observed  in  two of
 them.  Kidneys were normal  in  all fish, but gills  had  lesions  similar to  the
 800 yg/L treatment,  i.e. hypertrophied chloride cells  and  lamellae  engorged
 with  blood.

 1200  ug/L Esteron. 48  h  (A  fry)-/-  Livers  were normal  except  some slight
 degenerative  changes  in one.   Kidneys  were again normal and gills had
 similar  lesions to the 2 previous  treatments,  i.e. hypertrophied chloride
 cells and blood engorged lamellae.
          Esteron. 96 h + 2k h  rest.  (5  fryjj/- All tissues were normal
except for foci of peribiliary  necrosis  in 3  livers.

Control  (yearling coho salmon). 96 h  (3  fish) - All tissues were normal
except for some peripheral bile necrosis on the livers.
— Steelhead fry -Big Creek Salmon Hatchery.

-------
800 ug/L Esteron   % h  3  fish)  -  Except  for  peripheral  bile  duct  necrosis
l.vers were normal  in al   samples.   Kidneys were  normal  with  the exception
all s hL IT TUK    '?.^e  Collectin9 duc<  cells  from  two fish.   The
gills had several  abnormal . t.es; 2  of  them had  curved gill  filaments  the
(11* Lhrnicfc ^ epithelLUm had ^«nt  hypertrophled  chio'de  '
were enao led wi?i hi T"   f Ch Were  exfoli^ed,  and most of the lamellae
were engorged w.tn blood,  resulting in large  aneurisms on  some lamellae.

TORDON 22K (PICLORAM)


       '
                                    .      f°Ci  °f both  PTlph.r.1  •"-
5 mg/L picloram. 144 h
                      ^m» hS!l'  ".Ex^ensive degenerative changes were
                 Mnduced H^   P'C rn,?atUre and some s^Har to cyclo-
fiber-like strands  In the c ^P?^  '  LeT ^^°^ and contained
several abnormalities including hy^rtrophy of^hT3!'  WhHC 9H1S
wrmkled appearance of many of the epithelial cells           *' ^ 3

TORDON 101 (2,k-Q + PICLORAM)

cells of one kidney
as though it
                                      normal  except that one had peripheral
                                                          ne  a  perp
                      thlr, IT      , Vac^1es in the collecting duct
                                                           ™ »**
bile ducts were affed
gills were no maf     ''
                                          live- h.d degenerate bile
                                   Perib51iary bile necrosis.  Since
                                                                     duct
                                                                     the
K2 mg/L Tordon 101.  180 h (4 ffsh)
fron, th. Pn,ar cels
                                                            .
                                      due to the herbicide.  Kidneys and
                                          livers had degenerate bile duct
                                           All  kidneys and gills were
                                                        epithelial
                                                       necrosis was present
                                                  b,U necrosts Mas present
Tordon 101 caused perib!! ianecrosil  th*™ a9ain norma'-  An ^«'s °f
so it was assumed that It was due to the treatment"* PI"eSent in the c°ntrols
DINOSEB
                                          and Perib!"-y bile necrosis of
                           otherw.se the  w
                                          and Perib!"-y bile necrosis o
were normal.               otherw.se they were normal.  Kidneys and gills
                                      92

-------
JO yg/L dinoseb,  336  h  (3  fish)  -  There  was  some  hydropic  change  in one of
the  livers  and occasional  scattered  necrotic cells.   The other  two  livers
were normal.  The second segment of  the  proximal  tubule had occasional cells
with pyknotic nuclei  and first  proximal  segment cells contained eosinophilic
droplets.   Gills  were normal, tissue changes from this treatment were minor.

60 yg/L dinoseb,  168  h  (6  fish)  -  Livers,  kidneys and gills from all fish
were normal.  There appeared  to  be no effect on these tissues.

100 ug/L dinoseb,  114 h  (*t fish) - All the livers had peripheral bile necrosis
and extensive diffuse necrosis of  the remaining parenchymal cells.  All
regions of  the kidney tubules as well  as most of  the  hematopoietic tissue
were necrotic.  The gill epithelium  was  totally necrotic and sloughed from
the gill lamellae.  This treatment was severe and extremely toxic to the
tissues examined.

DI O.UAT

Control. 360 h (5  fish) -  Livers,  kidneys  and gills of these fish were
no rma 1.

10 mg/L diquat, ]kk h (3 fish) - Livers  showed hydropic degenerative changes
in centrolobular  regions and some  necrosis  in one liver.   Kidneys of all
three fish were normal but  gills showed  both  limited  hypertrophy and hyper-
Plasia of epithelial  cells.

20 mg/L diquat. iMt h (1 fish) - This  fish had extensive hydropic degeneration
and necrosis of the liver.  The kidney was normal   but the  gills had both
hypertrophy and hyperplasia of epithelial  cells.

3_mg/L diquat 360  h (5 fish) - Several foci of degenerate  and occasionally
necWic cells were present in the liver.  The kidneys also had numerous
degenerate and some necrotic tubule  cells, particularly in the collecting
ducts.   Both hypertrophy and hyperplasia of  lamellar and interlamellar
epithelium were present in  the gills.
                                    93

-------
APPENDIX III.  METRIC AND ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS
     English-to-Metric
                                                  Metric-to-English
1 inch

1 inch3

1 foot

1 foot2

1 chain

1 acre

1 foot2/acre

1 gallon(U.S.liquid)

1 pound

Degrees Fahrenheit
  2.5400 cm

  16-3871 cm3

  0.3048 m

  0.0929 m2

  20.1207 meter

  0.4047 ha

  0.2296 m2/ha

  3-7853 L

   453-5924 gms
1  centimeter

1  centimeter3

1  meter

1  meter2

1  meter

1  hectare
                  = 0.3937 in

                  = 0.0610 in3

                  = 3.2808 ft

                  = 10.7639 ft2

                  = 0.0497 chain

                  = 2.4710 ac

1  meter2/hectare  = 4.3560 ft2/ac

1  1'ter           = 0.2642 gallon(U.S.liqu

                    0.0022 pounds
                                          id)
= 9/5 (°C) + 32    Degrees Celsius   - 5/9 (°F - 32)
                               1  meter = 100 centimeters
                               1  meter = 1,000 millimeters
                               1  hectare = 10,000 m2
                                     94

-------
       TABLE A-l.  CONCENTRATIONS OF 2,4-D AND 2,4,5'T IN STEELHEAD TROUT
                   FRY FOLLOWING EXPOSURE TO ESTERON BRUSH KILLER^/
Exposure concentration
(yg/L)
nominal measured
A. May 31 -June
Control
75
450
450
800
800
1200
1200
1200 (+ 48 h
800 (mortal
1200 (mortal
B. June 12-16,
Control
800
1000
1200
4, 1977
32.9-34.0
35.2-37-2
77.4
80.1
V
V
Jb/
v
clean water)^/
ities)*/
itiesW
1977
6.5-7.2
202-269
240-243
226-246
Time
(h)
96
96
96
96
48
48
48
48
48
24
24

96
96
96
96
Residue found
Wet weight of (mg/kg)
tissue (g) 2,4-D 2,4,5'T
15.27
10.30
11.48
12.20
10.65
11.07
10.75
4.06
4.49
1.32
16.78

25-11
19.6
18.85
19.98
<0.05
0.90
41.0
23.1
8.70
19-57
8.28
1.48
3.39
64.5
16.47

_
5.12
7.66
11.35
<0.06
1.92
44.4
40.8
10.6
26.28
7-81
6.61
9.26
60.4
100.5

-
13-94
24.37
25.13
^ Whole body residues.
-/Samples lost during extraction.
                                     95

-------
   TABLE A-2.  SURVIVAL AND GILL ATPASE ACTIVITY OF YEARLING COHO SALMON
               EXPOSED TO TORDON 101 IN FRESHWATER AND SUBSEQUENT SURVIVAL
               FOLLOWING TRANSFER TO SEAWATER.
Concentration
(mg/L)£/
nominal measured
Percent
survival
Gill
ATPase^/^/
Percent
survival*!/
(240-h SW)
A. 144 h exposure (Mar. 28, 1977-Apr. 13, 1977)
  Control
     0.2
     0.6
     1.2
     1.8
(220)
(220)
(220)
(220)
(220)
0.02
0.34-0.36
0.32-0.49
1.07-1.24
0.94-1.25
100
100
100
100
100
3.64 + 1.46 (19)

3.10 + 1.00 (19)

3.93 ± 1.55 (20)
100 (20)
100 (22)
100 (22)
100 (22)
100 (22)
B. 380 h exposure (Mar. 28, 1977-Apr. 25, 1977)
Control
0.3
0.6
1 .2
1 .8
(180)
(180)
(180)
(180)
(180)
0
0
0
1
1
.005
.26-0.
.50-0.
•33-1.
.23-1.

39
52
40
39
100
100
100
100
100
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
00
54
30
06
43
+ 0.86
+ 0.99
+ 0.91
+ 1.40
+ 0.80
(19)
(19)
(20)
(20)
(20)
100
100
100
100
96.
(30)
(30)
(30)
(30)
7 (30)S/
^-'Number of fish used in parenthesis.
-  (Na,K)-stimulated ATPase activity of gill; mean +_ SE; number of fish
   sampled in parenthesis.
^/Exposed for 480 h to seawater as fish appeared to behave differently  than
   other groups.  One death occurred after 400 h of exposure.
                                     96

-------
  TABLE A-3-   EFFECT OF TORDON 101  EXPOSURE ON AVERAGE LENGTH,  WEIGHT,  AND  CONDITION  FACTOR.
Date
of
sample
Mar. 9, 1977









Apr. 12, 1977









Days
of
exposure
05/
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o-7
0
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Tank
No.
1
• 2
7
8
3
4
5
6
9
10
1
2
7
8
3
4
5
6
9
10
Nominal con-
centration
(mg/L)
Control
Con t ro 1
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.8
Control
Control
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.8
Fork
length
cm ± SE
15-5 +
15-1 +
14.8 4
15-2 4
14.8 4
15.2 4
15.1 +
15.4 4
14.9 +
14.9 ±
15-7 +
15.4 +
15-6 +
15-5 +
15.5 +
15.6 4
14.7 4
15.6 4
15.3 +
15-4 4
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
32
17
29
26
28
22
25
20
23
17
0.21
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
19
.18
.25
.24
.16
.23
.20
.21
Weight
g ±_ SE
42.9 4- 2
39.9 + 1
37.9 + 2
40.5 + 1
37.6 4- 2
40.4 + 1
39-2 + 1
41.4 4 1
39-0 4- 1
37.4 4 1
39-1+1
37.9 4
39-9 +
39.2 4
39.6 +
40.1 4
33.5 4
41 .7 +
36.9 +
38.5 +

.42
.29
.16
.86
.10
.63
.83
.49
.85
.23
.58
.14
.64
.34
.88
.96
.18
.98
.47
• 55









1
1
Condi t
factor
KFL ±_
.118 4
.163 4
.134 4
.145 +
.125 4
.130 4
.118 4
.111 4
.156 4
.125 4
0.998 4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.022 4
.035 4
.043 +
.024 4
.036 4
.038 4
.067 4
.016 4
.038 4
ion
SE
0.012
0.013
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.012
0.011
0.012
0.014
0.009
0.007
0.008
0.011
0.009
0.008
0.011
0.018
0.021
0.011
0.009
—Sample size 30
—'Sample size 40

-------
   TABLE A-1*.   PERCENT MIGRATION (TO JULY 6,  1977)  OF YEARLING COHO SALMON
               RELEASED INTO A SMALL COASTAL  STREAM FOLLOWING ACUTE AND
               CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO TORDON 101  (RELEASED APRIL 13, 1977).

                                           Percent migration
Nominal  concentration         	Days post release	
     (mg/L) 	1^5	6-10	11-20      21-30      31 +

1.  Acute exposure - 96 h

     Control
     0.3
     0.6
     1.2
     1.8

 2. Chronic  exposure  -  360 h

     Control
     0.3
     0.6
     1.2
     1.8
60.9
59.8
50.it
55.0
61.5
63.6
64.5
51. 3
56.0
62.4
63.6
65. 4
52.2
56.0
62.4
63.6
67.3
53.9
56.9
62.4
63.6
67-3
53-9
56.9
62. 4
46.0
48. A
42.7
31.1
30.2
47.9
52.6
45-5
37.8
34.9
48.3
54.0
47-4
39-2
39.2
48.8
54.0
48.3
39.2
39-6
48.8
54.0
48.3
39-2
39-6

-------
    TABLE A-5.   PERCENT MIGRATION (TO JULY 6,  1977)  OF YEARLING COHO  SALMON
                RELEASED INTO A SMALL COASTAL  STREAM FOLLOWING  ACUTE  AND
                CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO  DINOSEB (RELEASED MAY  5,  1977).
Nominal concentration
yg/L
1. Acute exposures -
Control
10
20
4o
60
2. Chronic
Control
Control
10
10
20
20
40
60
60
(115)^
(113)
( 98)
(HO),.
(105)^
exposures
(103)
(100)
(104)
(105)
(100)
(103)
(109) . ..
( &&)£/'*/
(109)£/
1-5
96 h
60.0
53-1
62.2
47-3
43.6
- 285 h
47-6
59-0
59-6
60.9
59-0
43-7
39-4
26.1
35.8
Percent migration
Days post release
6-10

63-5
55-7
66.3
51.8
52.5

52.4
65.0
65-4
68.6
64.0
49-5
53-2
35.2
49-5
11-20

66.1
55-7
67.3
54.5
54.5

54.5
65.0
68.2
71.4
66.0
50.5
55.0-
37-5
56.9
21-30

66.1
56.6
68.4
54.5
56.4

54.4
65.0
69.2
72.4
66.0
51.5
56.0
37.5
56.9
31 +

66.1
57-5
68.4
54.5
56.4

54.4
65-0
69.2
72.4
66.0
51-5
56.0
38.6
56.9
—'Number of fish released in parenthesis
—'24 h exposure
— 48 h exposure
— Some mortality occurred in the exposure tanks prior to marking and release.
                                    99

-------
o
o
           TABLE A-6   CONCENTRATION OF DINOSEB IN VARIOUS TISSUES OF YEARLING COHO SALMON  FOLLOWING

                       EXPOSURE TO SUBLETHAL AND LETHAL CONCENTRATIONS OF DINOSEB^/.


Control ^ a
b
20 yg/L (384 h) a
b
60 yg/L (144 h) a
b
skin
<0.01
<0.03
<0.02
<0.03
<0.02
<0.03
	 Loncentrai. ion 01 uinuacu \w/ •-j 	 .
m,,<:rlP qill spleen qal 1 bladder
<0.01
<0.09
<0.0i
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.09 <0.28 <0.11
<0.15
0.09 1.4 <0.15
(0.06) (0.3)
0.07
(0.03)
<0.08 0.61 0.77
(0.38) (0.23)
<0.09
1 i ver
<0.05
<0.29
0.40
(0.06
0.15
(0.03)
<0.07
<0.08
kidney
<0.04
<0.09
0.37
(0.05)
0.11
(0.03)
<0.04
<0.11
       y
 On basis of wet weight of tissue examined; to obtain an adequate tissue sample generally  3-5 fish



'vTiruesCgfVineas less than «) a number are below the detection limits; numbers in parentheses below a nu^er


indicate the detection limit.

-------
            TABLE A-?.  EFFECT OF DIQUAT EXPOSURE ON AVERAGE LENGTH, WEIGHT, AND CONDITION FACTOR.
Date
of
sample
May 10, 1977









May 26, 1977









Days
of
exposure
(£/
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<£7
0
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Tank
No.
1
2
7
8
3
4
5
6
9
10
1
2
7
8
3
4
5
6
9
10
Nominal con-
centration
(mg/L)
Control
Control
0.5
0.5
1 .0
1.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
Control
Control
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
Fork
length
cm + SE
16.2 + 0.16
16.8 + 0.27
16.8 + 0.31
17.3 + 0.38
16.4 + 0.24
16.9 + 0.27
16.4 + 0.25
16.9 + 0.29
16.6 + 0.25
16.9 + 0.22
16.8 + 0.20
16.5 + 0.20
17-5 + 0.28
16.9 + 0.26
16.5 + 0.16
17-0 + 0.21
17-3 + 0.25
17.1 + 0.21
16.7 + 0.23
17.1 + 0.22
Weight
9 ±. SE
42.7 + 1.35
47.1 + 2.15
48.2 + 2.84
54.2 + 3.51
44.3 + 1.91
48.7 + 2.18
46.3 + 2.01
50.3 + 2.59
46.9 + 2.25
49.6 + 1.98
47.3 + 1.67
44.8 + 1.54
53-6 + 2.90
49.2 + 2.28
45-3 + 1.59
48.9 + 1.88
52.9 + 2.63
50.7 + 1.97
46.7 + 2.11
49.6 + 1.77
Condition
factor
KFL ± SE
0.994 + 0.008
0.980 + 0.011
0.992 + 0.009
1.009 + 0.009
0.988 + 0.008
0.985 + 0.011
1.026 + 0.009
1.019 + 0.011
1.001 + 0.009
1.005 + 0.008
0.986 + 0.008
0.984 + 0.009
0.977 + 0.007
0.990 + 0.009
0.987 + 0.013
0.972 + 0.013
0.994 + 0.010
1.003 + 0.015
0.981 + 0.008
0.979 + 0.009
a/
~ Sample size 30

*/Sample size 40

-------
     TABLE A-8.  PERCENT MIGRATION (TO JULY 6,1977) OF YEARLING COHO SALMON
                 RELEASED INTO A SMALL COASTAL STREAM FOLLOWING ACUTE AND
                 CHROMIC EXPOSURE TO DtQUAT (RELEASED MAY 26, 1977).
Nominal concentration
mg/L
1. Acute exposure - 96
Control
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
2. Chronic exposures -
Control
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
Percent migration
Days podt release
1-5
h
66.0
47.6
54.5
38.8
41.0
285 h
55.2
43.2
38.7
25.6
16.9
6-10

71.8
58.1
60.4
46.9
53.0

62.3
53.9
47.5
41.7
26.4
11-20

72.8
58.1
62.4
47.9
53.0

63.4
- 55.5
48.1
42.2
26.4
21-30

72.8
58.1
62.4
47.9
53.0

63.4
55.5
48.1
42.2
26.4
31+

72.8
58. l^/
62.4
47. <*-'
53.0-7

63.4
55.5
48. 1-/
42. 2-7
26. l&
—/Migration rates significantly lower than controls (P = 0.05).
                                         102

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
    EPA-600/3-79-071
2.
•*. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Effects of Selected Herbicides  on Smelting of Coho
  Salmon
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
                              5, REPORT DATE
                              June 1979  issuing  date
                              6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  Harold W. Lorz, Susan W. Glenn,  Ronald H.  Williams,
  Clair M.  Kunkel, Logan A. Norn's and Bobby R. Loper
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
  Oregon Department of Fish and  Wildlife
  Research and Development Section,  28655 Highway 34,
  Con/all is, Oregon
                              1BA608
                              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                              R-804283
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Corvallis Environmental Research  Laboratory
  Office of Research and Development
  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  Corvallis, OR 97330
                              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                              Final 1-5-77  to  1-4-78
                              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                              EPA/600/02
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 3. o Ur r (_ t- ivi c i^ i *-v n T i^v^id^
  With the  technical  assistance of  the  Pacific Northwest Forest and Range  Experiment
  Station,  Corvallis, Oregon.
16. ABSTRACT
  Static 96-h LC50 values for 12 water-soluble herbicides with yearling  coho  salmon in
  freshwater were:  acrolein 68 ug/1;  dinoseb 100 ug/1; picloram 5.0-17.5 mg/1;  2,4,5-T
  (tri ethyl ami ne)> 10 mg/1; atrazine>  15  mg/1; diquat 30 mg/1; amitrole-T 70 mg/1;
  paraquat 76 mg/1; dicamba> 100 mg/1;  and Krenite and 2,4-D (dimethylamine) > 200 mg/1.
  Amitrole-T, diquat, and paraquat exposure  in freshwater reduced the  survival of
  salmon smolts placed in seawater.  Diquat also inhibited downstream migration  of
  smolts.   Under normal field use,  acrolein and dinoseb could produce mortality  of all
  life  stages of salmonids if treated  irrigation waters were released into streams
  prior to herbicide inactivation.   The  use of diquat at recommended  treatment
  levels could reduce downstream migration  of smolts and decrease survival in seawater.
  All  other herbicide formulations  tested appeared to have no effect  on  smolting of
  coho  salmon.
17.
  KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
 "Herbicides, Salmon, Animal Behavior,  Animal
  Migrations, Water Balance, Histology,
  Pollution, Toxicology.
                                             Ib.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                           c.  COSATI Field/Group
                                             06/A,F,T
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
     Release to Public
                 19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report/
                       unclassified
21, NO. OF PAGES

  116  	
                 20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                     unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EpA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)
               103

-------