United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas NV 89114
EPA-600/3-79-113
December 1979
Research and Development
vvEPA
Distribution of
Phytoplankton in
California Lakes
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad categories
were established to facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously planned to foster
technology transfer and maximum interface in related fields. The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy—Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans.plant and animal species, and
materials. Problems are assessed for their long-and short-term influences. Investiga-
tions include formations, transport, and pathway studies to determine the fate of
pollutants and their effects. This work provided the technical basis for setting standards
to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the aquatic, terrestrial, and
atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161
-------
EPA-600/3-79-113
December 1979
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN CALIFORNIA LAKES
by
M. K. Morris*, W. D. Taylor, L. R. Williams,
S. C. Hern, V. W. Lambou, and F. A. Morris*
Water and Land Quality Branch
Monitoring Operations Division
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
*Department of Biological Sciences
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89114
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory-Las Vegas, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does
not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
Protection of the environment requires effective regulatory actions
which are based on sound technical and scientific information. This
information must include the quantitative description and linking of
pollutant sources, transport mechanisms, interactions, and resulting effects
on man and his environment. Because of the complexities involved, assessment
of specific pollutants in the environment requires a total systems approach
which transcends the media of air, water, and land. The Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas contributes to the formation and
enhancement of a sound monitoring data base for exposure assessment through
programs designed to:
• develop and optimize systems and strategies for monitoring
pollutants and their impact on the environment
• demonstrate new monitoring systems and technologies by
applying them to fulfill special monitoring needs of the
Agency's operating programs
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
26 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
California, along with results from the calculation of several commonly used
biological indices of water quality and community structure. These data can
be used to biologically characterize the study lakes, and as baseline data
for future investigations. This report was written for use by Federal,
State, and local governmental agencies concerned with water quality analysis,
monitoring, and/or regulation. Private industry and individuals similarly
involved with the biological aspects of water quality will find the document
useful. For further information contact the Water and Land Quality Branch,
Monitoring Operations Division,
.
George Hi.'Morgan
Director
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas
m
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ............................... lni
Introduction ............................. ^
Materials and Methods ....... ................. 3
Lake and Site Selection ..................... 3
Sample Preparation ....................... 3
Examination ........................... 4
Quality Control ......................... 5
Results ............................... 6
Nygaard's Trophic State Indices ................. 6
Palmer's Organic Pollution Indices ............... 6
Species Diversity and Abundance Indices ............. 8
Species Occurrence and Abundance ................ ^
Literature Cited ........................... ^
Appendix A. Phytoplankton Species list for the State
of California ...................... ^
Appendix B. Summary of Phytoplankton Data .............. 15
-------
INTRODUCTION
The collection and analysis of phytoplankton data were included in the
National Eutrophication Survey in an effort to determine relationships between
algal characteristics and trophic status of individual lakes.
During spring, summer, and fall of 1975, the Survey sampled 156 lakes in
11 States. Over 450 algal species and varieties were identified and
enumerated from the 430 water samples examined.
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
26 lakes sampled in the State of California (Table 1). The Nygaard's Trophic
State (Nygaard 1949), Palmer's Organic Pollution (Palmer 1969), and species
diversity and abundance indices are also included.
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lake Name ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STORET No.
County
0601
0602
0603
0604
0605
0606
0607
0608
0609
0610
0611
0613
0614
Amador Reservoir
Boca Lake
Lake Britton
Casitas Reservoir
Crowley Lake
Don Pedro Reservoir
Lake Elsinore
Fallen Leaf Lake
Lake Hennessey
Lake Henshaw
Iron Gate Reservoir
Lower Klamath Lake
Lopez Lake
Amador
Nevada
Shasta
Ventura
Mono
Tuolume
Riverside
El Dorado
Napa
San Diego
Siskiyou
Siskiyou
San Luis Obispo
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
STORET No.
0615
0616
0617
0618
0619
0620
0621
0622
0623
0624
0625
0626
0627
Lake Name
Lake Mary
Lake Mendocino
Nicasio Reservoir
Lower Otay Reservoir
Lake Pillsbury
Santo Margarita Lake
Lake Shasta
Shaver Lake
Silver Lake
Tullock Reservoir
Upper Twin Lake
at Bridgeport
Lower Twin Lake
at Bridgeport
Kirman Lake*
County
Mono
Mendocino
Marin
San Diego
Lake
San Luis Obispo
Shasta
Fresno
Mono
Tuolume
Mono
Mono
Mono
*Based on a single sample at special request
-------
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LAKE AND SITE SELECTION
Lakes and reservoirs included in the Survey were selected through
discussions with State water pollution agency personnel and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Regional Offices (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1975). Screening and selection strongly emphasized lakes with actual or
potential accelerated eutrophication problems. As a result, the selection was
limited to lakes:
(1) impacted by one or more municipal sewage treatment plant outfalls
either directly into the lake or by discharge to an inlet tributary
within approximately 40 kilometers of the lake;
(2) 40 hectares or larger in size; and
(3) with a mean hydraulic retention time of at least 30 days.
Specific selection criteria were waived for some lakes of particular State
interest.
Sampling sites for a lake were selected based on available information on
lake morphometry, potential major sources of nutrient input, and on-site
judgment of the field limnologist (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1975).
Primary sampling sites were chosen to reflect the deepest portion of each
major basin in a test lake. Where many basins were present, selection was
guided by nutrient source information on hand. At each sampling site, a
depth-integrated phytoplankton sample was taken. Depth-integrated samples
were uniform mixtures of water from the surface to a depth of 15 feet
(4.6 meters) or from the surface to the lower limit of the photic zone
representing 1 percent of the incident light, whichever was greater. If the
depth at the sampling site was less than 15 feet (4.6 meters), the sample was
taken from just off the bottom to the surface. Normally, a lake was sampled
three times in 1 year, providing information on spring, summer, and fall
conditions.
SAMPLE PREPARATION
To preserve the sample 4 milliliters (ml) of Acid-Lugol's solution
(Prescott 1970) were added to each 130-ml sample from each site at the time of
collection. The samples were shipped to the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, where equal volumes from each site
-------
were mixed to form two 130-ml composite samples for a given lake. One
composite sample was put into storage and the other was used for the
examination.
Prior to examination, the composite samples were concentrated by the
settling method. Solids were allowed to settle for at least 24 hours prior to
siphoning off the supernate. The volume of the removed supernate and the
volume of the remaining concentrate were measured and concentrations
determined. A small (8-ml) library subsample of the concentrate was then
taken. The remaining concentrate was gently agitated to resuspend the
plankton and poured into a capped, graduated test tube. If a preliminary
examination of a sample indicated the need for a more concentrated sample, the
contents of the test tube were further concentrated by repeating the settling
method. Final concentrations varied from 15 to 40 times the original.
Permanent slides were prepared from concentrated samples after analysis
was complete. A ring of clear Karo® corn syrup with phenol (a few crystals of
phenol were added to each 100 ml of syrup) was placed on a glass slide. A
drop of auperconcentrate from the bottom of the test tube was placed in the
ring. This solution was thoroughly mixed and topped with a coverglass. After
the syrup at the edges of the coverglass had hardened, the excess was scraped
away and the mount was sealed with clear fingernail polish. Permanent diatom
slides were prepared by drying sample material on a coverglass, heating in a
muffle furnace at 400° C for 45 minutes, and mounting in Hyrax®. Finally, the
mounts were sealed with clear fingernail polish.
Backup samples, library samples, permanent sample slides, and
Hyrax-mounted diatom slides are being stored and maintained at the
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas.
EXAMINATION
The phytoplankton samples were examined with the aid of binocular
compound microscopes. A preliminary examination was performed to precisely
identify and list all forms encountered. The length of this examination
varied depending on the complexity of the sample. An attempt was made to find
and identify all of the forms present in each sample. Often forms were
observed which could not be identified to species or to genus. Abbreviated
descriptions were used to keep a record of these forms (e.g., lunate cell,
blue-green filament, Navicula #1). Diatom slides were examined using a
standard light microscope. If greater resolution was essential to accurately
identify the diatoms, a phase-contrast microscope was used.
After the species list was compiled, phytoplankton were enumerated using
a Neubauer Counting Chamber with a 40X objective lens and a 10X ocular lens.
All forms within each field were counted. The count was continued until a
minimum of 100 fields had been viewed, or until the dominant form had been
observed a minimum of 100 times.
^Registered trademark
-------
QUALITY CONTROL
Project phycologists performed internal quality control intercomparisons
regularly on 7 percent of the species identification and counts. Although an
individual had primary responsibility for analyzing a sample, taxonomic
problems were discussed among the phycologists.
Additional quality control checks were performed on the Survey samples by
Dr. G. W. Prescott of the University of Montana at the rate of 5 percent.
Quality control checks were made on 75 percent of these samples to verify
species identifications while checks were made on the remaining 25 percent of
the samples to verify genus counts. Presently, the agreement between quality
control checks for species identification and genus enumerations is
satisfactory.
-------
RESULTS
A phytoplankton species list for the State is presented in Appendix A.
Appendix B summarizes all of the phytoplankton data collected from the State
by the Survey. The latter is organized by lake, and includes an alphabetical
phytoplankton species list with concentrations for individual species given by
sampling date. Results from the application of several indices are presented
(Nygaard s Trophic State, Palmer's Organic Pollution, and species diversity
???nSr?n^?Se)' ?oi^ "as been assigned a four-digit STORET number.
(STORET (STOrage and RETneval) is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
computer system which processes and maintains water quality data.) The first
two digits of the STORET number identify the State; the last two dig tl
identify the lake. 3
NYGAARD 'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES
id6VlSed by N^rd (1949) were Proposed under the assumption
ThP nnr if1 9TP? T5 indicative of levels of nutrient enrichment.
These indices were calculated in order to aid in determining the surveyed
lakes trophic status. As a general rule, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, centric
diatoms, and members of the Chlorococcales are found in waters that are
eutrophic (rich in nutrients), while desmids and many pennate diatoms
generally cannot tolerate high nutrient levels and so are found in
oligotrophic waters (poor in nutrients).
In applying the indices to the Survey data, the number of taxa in each
major group was determined from the species list for each sample. The ratios
of these groups give numerical values which can be used as a b o og cal index
of water richness. The five indices and the ranges of values estabi shed for
Danish lakes by Nygaard for each trophic state are presented in Tab \l ? ThI
appropriate symbol, (E) eutrophic and (0) oligotrophic follows lach
calculated va ue in the tables in Appendix B. A quest on mart (?) following a
C
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
(i969)/nalyzed ^ports from 165 authors and developed
-------
TABLE 2. NYGAARD'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES ADAPTED FROM HUTCHINSON (1967)
Index
Calculation
Ongotrophic Eutrophlc
Myxophycean
Chlorophycean
Diatom
Euglenophyte
Compound
Myxophyceae
Desmideae
Chlorococcales
Desmideae
Centric Diatoms
Pennate Diatoms
Euglenophyta
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales +
0.0-0.4
0.0-0.7
0.0-0.3
0.0-0.2
0.0-1.0
0.1-3.0
0.2-9.0
0.0-1.75
0.0-1.0
1.2-25
Centric Diatoms + Euglenophyta
Desmideae
TABLE 3. ALGAL GENUS POLLUTION INDEX
{Palmer 1969)
TABLE 4. ALGAL SPECIES POLLUTION
INDEX (Palmer 1969)
Genus
Anacystis
Ankistrodesmus
Chlamydomonas
Chi orel la
Closterium
Cyclotella
Euglena
Gomphonema
Lepocinclis
Melosira
Micractinium
Navicula
Nitzschia
Oscillatoria
Pandorina
Phacus
Phormidium
Scenedesmus
Sticjeoclonium
Synedra
Pollution
Index
1
2
4
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
3
3
5
1
2
1
4
2
2
Species
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Arthrospira jenneri
Chlorella vulgaris
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Euglena gracilis
Euglena viridis
Gomphonema parvulum
Melosira varians
Navicula cryptocephala
Nitzschia acicularis
Nitzschia palea
Oscillatoria chlorina
Oscillatoria limosa
Oscillatoria princeps
Oscillatoria putrida
Oscillatoria tenuis
Pandorina morum
Scenedesmus quadricauda
Stigeoclonium tenue
Synedra ulna
Pollution
Index
3
2
2
2
1
6
1
2
1
1
5
2
4
1
1
4
3
4
3
3
-------
extremely tolerant forms. Palmer based the index numbers on occurrence
organic aolnuTionere emphasl2ed by the authors as being especially tolerant of
In analyzing a water sample, any of the 20 genera or species of algae
present in concentrations of 50 per milliliter or more are recorded. The
pollution index numbers of the algae present are totaled, providing a genus
score and a species score. Palmer determined that a score of 20 or more for
either index can be taken as evidence of high organic pollution, while a score
of 15 to 19 is taken as probable evidence of high organic pollution. Lower
figures suggest that the organic pollution of the sample is not high, that the
sample is not representative, or that some substance or factor interferina
with algal persistence is present and active.
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
"Information content" of biological samples is being used commonly by
nlnl*915? 9S \m?a!ure of diversity. Diversity in this connection means the
degree of uncertainty attached to the specific identity of any randomly
selected individual. The greater the number of taxa and the more equal their
fSE? £S> the Qreater the uncertainty, and hence, the diversity (Pielou
1966). There are several methods of measuring diversity, e.g., the formulas
110"1 (196 nd Shann°n 3nd Wea?6r 1963' Th* ™thd ™
atp (1963)' Th* ™thod whcs
appropriate depends on the type of biological sample on hand.
moac Pl6l?U J1966L classifies the ^P" of biological samples and gives the
measure of diversity appropriate for each type. The Survey phytoplankton
samples are what she classifies as larger samples (collections in Pielou' s
terminology) from which random subsamples can be drawn. Accord ng to Pielou,
the average diversity per individual (H) for these types of samples can be
estimated from the Shannon-Wiener formula (Shannon and Weaver 1963):
S
= -E
r?r±h °f £h* ^h*axon 1n the sample, which is calculated
the number of individuals per milliliter of thp ith
s'!!J'1!"wai«S«.Wtfr
s
8
-------
In the Shannon-Wiener formula, an increase in the number of taxa and/or
an increase in the evenness of the distribution of individuals among taxa will
increase the average diversity per individual from its minimal value of zero.
Sager and Hasler (1969) found that the richness of taxa was of minor
importance in determination of average diversity per individual for
phytoplankton and they concluded that phytoplankton taxa in excess of the 10
to 15 most abundant ones have little effect on H. This was verified by our
own calculations. Our counts are in number per milliliter and since
logarithms to the base 2 were used in our calculations, H is expressed in
units of bits per individual. When individuals of a taxon were so rare that
they were not counted, a value of 1/130 per mil IT liter or 0.008 per milliliter
was used in the calculations since at least one individual of the taxon must
have been present in the collection.
A Survey sample for a given lake represents a composite of all
phytoplankton collected at different sampling sites on the lake during a given
sampling period. Since the number of samples (M) making up a composite is a
function of both the complexity of the lake sampled and its size, it should
affect the richness-of-taxa component of the diversity of our phytoplankton
collections. The maximum diversity (MaxH) (i.e., when the individuals are
distributed among the taxa as evenly as possible) was estimated from log£ S
(Pielou 1966), while the minimum diversity (MinH), was estimated from the
f ormul a:
MinH - S-] loo ] - N - (S-1) loo N - (S-1)
MinH - - — I0g2¥ ^ Iog2 N
given by Zand (1976). The total diversity (D) was calculated from HN (Pielou
1966). Also given in Appendix B are L (the mean number of individuals per
taxa per milliliter) and K (the number of individuals per milliliter of the
most abundant taxon in the sample).
The evenness component of diversity (J) was estimated from H/MaxH
(Pielou 1966). Relative evenness (RJ) was calculated from the formula:
D1 H-MinH
KJ =
MaxH-MinH
given by Zand (1976). Zand suggests that RJ be used as a substitute for both
J and the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris (1968). As pointed
out by Zand, the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris does not
properly express what it is intended to show, i.e., the position of H in the
range between MaxH and MinH. RJ may range from 0 to 1; being 1 for the most
even samples and 0 for the least even samples.
Zand (1976) suggests that diversity indices be expressed in units of
"sits", i.e., in logarithms to base S (where S is the total number of taxa in
the sample) instead of in "bits", i.e., in logarithms to base 2. Zand points
out that the diversity index in sits per individual is a normalized number
ranging from 1 for the most evenly distributed samples to 0 for the least
evenly distributed samples. Also, it can be used to compare different
samples, independent of the number of taxa in each. The diversity in bits per
-------
individual should not be used in direct comparisons involving various samples
which have different numbers of taxa. Since MaxH equals log S, the expression
in sits is equal to logs S, or 1. Therefore diversity in sits per
individual is numerically equivalent to J, the evenness component for the
Shannon-Wiener formula.
SPECIES OCCURRENCE AND ABUNDANCE
The alphabetic phytoplankton species list for each lake, presented in
Appendix B, gives the concentrations of individual species by sampling date.
Concentrations are in cells, colonies, or filaments (CEL, COL, FIL) per
milliliter. An "X" after a species name indicates that the species identified
in the preliminary examination was in such a low concentration that it did not
appear in the count. A blank space indicates that the organism was not found
in the sample collected on that date. Column S is used to designate the
examiner s subjective opinion of the five dominant taxa in a sample, based
upon relative size and concentration of the organism. The percent column (%C)
presents, by abundance, the percentage composition of each taxon
10
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Basharin, G. P. 1959. On a statistical estimate for the entropy of a
sequence of independent random variables, pp. 333-336. In: Theory of
Probability and Its Applications (translation of "Teoriya Veroyatnosei i
ee Premeneniya"). N. Artin (ed). 4. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Brillouin, L. 1962. Science and Information Theory (2nd ed.). Academic
Press, New York. 351 pp.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. II. Introduction to Lake
Biology and the Limnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
1,115 pp.
Nygaard, G. 1949. Hydrobiological studies of some Danish ponds and lakes.
II. (K danske Vidensk. Selsk.) Biol. Sci. 7:293.
Palmer, C. M. 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic
pollution. J. Phycol. 5:78-82.
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of
biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13:131-144.
Prescott, G. W. 1970. How to Know the Freshwater Algae. William C. Brown
Company, Dubuque. 348 pp.
Sager, P. E., and A. D. Hasler. 1969. Species diversity in lacustrine
phytoplankton. I. The components of the index of diversity
from Shannon's formula. Amer. Natur. 103(929):51-59.
Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Commu-
nication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 117 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophication Survey
Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Corvallis Environmental
Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. 91 pp.
Wilhm, V. L., and T. C. Dorris. 1968. Biological parameters for water
quality criteria. Bio-Science. 18:477.
Zand, S. M. 1976. Indexes associated with information theory in water
quality. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed. 48(8):2026-2031.
11
-------
APPENDIX A
PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES LIST FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
-------
Achnanthes lanceolata
Achnanthes microcephala
Ampho ra
Andbaena circinalis
Anabaenopsis circularis
Anabaenopsis elenkinii
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
v. acicularis
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
V. mirabilis
Anomoeoneis costata
Aphanisomenon floe-aquae
Aphanoeapsa del-icatissima
Aphanocapea elach-ista
Aet&rianella fomosa
Asterionella formosa
v. gracillima
Attheya zaehariasi
Cat one-is
Ceratiwn h-Lrundinetla
Ceratiwn hir'und'ine'l'La
f. brachyceras
Ceratum hirundinella
f. f urea-ides
Chaetoceros
Chlamydcmonas d-inobryonii
ChroamonctB
Closterium
Cocacneie plaaentula
Coelastrim microporum
Coelastrum reticulatum
Coelastvwn reticulation
v. polydhordon
Coela strum sphaericton
Coelosphaeriian kuetzingiamm
Cosmarium
Crucigenia crueifera
Cruoigen'la quadrata
Cruc-Lgenia t&trapedia
Crypt omonas eroea
Cryptamonae maresonii
Crypt omonas ovata
Cyclotella bodanica
Cyclotella bodaniaa
v. stella
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Cyclotella stelligera
Cylindrotheca gracilis
Cymatopleura solea
Cymbella mexicana
Cymbella minuta
Cymbella triangulum
Dactylococcops-is irregularis
Diatoma Dulgare
Dictyosphaerium pulchellum
Dinobryon bavariaum
Dindbryon cylindricwn
Dinobryon divergens
Dinobryon sociale
Diploneis
Diplopsalis acuta
Eldkatothrix gelatinosa
Eldkatothrix virndis
Entanoneis alata
Entomoneis ornata
Epithemia sorex
Epifhemia turgida
Eudorina elegans
Euglena ehrenbergii
Eunotia curvata
Fragilaria brevistriata
Fragilaria capucina
v. mesolepta
Fragilaria construens
Fragilaria crotonensis
Fragilaria inflata
Fragilaria leptostauron
Glenodiniim edax
Glenodiniim gyrmodinium
Glenodiniwn gyrmodiniim
v. biscutelliforme
Glenodiniim oculatwn
Gloeocapsa
Gleocystis planetonica
Golenkinia radiata
Gomphonema parvulum
Gomphonema truncation
Gyrmodinium ordination
Gyrosigma
Hannaea arcus
Hantzschia amp'hioxys
f- capitata
Kirchneriella contorta
Lagerheimia ciliata
V. minor
Lagerheimia quadriseta
Lagerheimia subsalsa
Lyngbya
Mall omonas acaroid.es
Mallomonas pseudooovonata.
13
-------
Melosira distans
Melosira granulata
Melosira granulata
v. angustissima
Melosira granulata
V. angustissima f. spiral-is
Melosria italics
Melosira italica
f. euro at a
Melosira various
Meridian circulare
Merismopedia glauca
Merismopedia minima
Merismopedia tenuissima
Microaystis aeruginosa
Mieroeyetis inoerba
Mougeatia
Naviaula cuepidata
Naeieula tripunetata
V. schizonemoides
Nitsechia longissima
v. revered
Nitzschia tryblionella
Nitzechia verniaularis
Oocystis
Oscillatoria agordhii
Oscillatoria lirnnetica
Pandorina mo mm
Pediastrum boryaram
Pediastnm duplex
Pediastrum duplex
V. alafhratum
Pediastrum duplex
v. reticulation
Pediastrum simplex
v. duodenarium
Pediastrum tetras
V. tetraodon
Peridinium bipes
Peridinium incanspicuim
Peridinium penardifome
Peridinium quadridens
Peridinium willei
Phaeus helikoides
Phacus tortus
Phormidium rmciaola
Pinnularia
Pleurosigma
Rhoicosp'henia curvata
Khopalodia gibba
Soenedesmus acuminatus
Scenedesmus acutus
Scenedesmus arcuatus
Scenedesmus bicaudatus
Scenedesmus bijuga
Scenedesmus bijuga
v. altemans
Scenedesmus dimorphus
Scenedesmus intermedius
v. bicaudatus
Scenedesmus quadricauda
Schroederia setigera
Sphaerocystis schroeteri
Spirogrya
Staurastrum
Stephanodiscus astraea
v. minutula
Stephanodiscus niagarae
Surirella angustata
Surirella elegans
Surirella ovata
Surirella tenera
Synedra acus
Synedra cyclopum
Synedra delicatissima
v. angustissima
Synedra ulna
Tabellaria fenestrata
Tetraedron constriction
Tetraedron minimum
Tetraedron minimum
v. scrobiculatum
Tetraedron trigonum
v. gracile
Tetrastrum glabrum
Trachelananas hispida
Traahelcmonas intermedia
Trachelanonas uraeolata
V. ovalis
Trachelanonas volvocina
Treubaria setigerum
Treubaria triappendiculata
Vlothrix
14
-------
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF PHYTOPLANKTON DATA
This appendix was generated by computer. Because it was only possible to
use upper case letters in the printout, all scientific names are printed in
upper case and are not italicized.
The alphabetic phytoplankton lists include taxa without species names
(e.g., EUNOTIA, EUNOTIA #1, FLAGELLATE, FLAGELLATES, MICROCYSTIS INCERTA?,
CHLOROPHYTAN COCCOID CELLED COLONY). When species determinations were not
possible, symbols or descriptive phrases were used to separate taxa for
enumeration purposes. Each name on a list, however, represents a unique
species different from any other name on the same list, unless otherwise
noted, for counting purposes.
Numbers were used to separate unidentified species of the same genus. A
generic name listed alone is also a unique species. A question mark (?) is
placed immediately after the portion of a name which was assigned with
uncertainty. Numbered, questioned, or otherwise designated taxa were
established on a lake-by-lake basis; therefore NAVICULA#2 from lake A cannot
be compared to NAVICULA #2 from lake B. Pluralized categories (e.g.,
FLAGELLATES, CENTRIC DIATOMS, SPP.) were used for counting purposes when taxa
could not be properly differentiated on the counting chamber.
15
-------
LAKE NAMEl AMAROR RES.
STURET NUMBERt 0601
NYflAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 14 75 06 26 75 11 13 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EyGLENOPHYTU
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 t
1,67 E
OS/0 E
3.00 E
6.00 E
0/06 ?
1.00 E
10,0 E
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 t
2.00 E
07/0 E
PALMERi8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 14 75 06 26 75 11 12 75
GENUS
SPECIES
01
00
04
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER Or .SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIV1DUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
03 14 75 06 26 75 11 12 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RO
L
K
0.19
11,00
2.00
3.46
0.00
13330,97
70U3.00
O.OS
0.06
6378.45
68733.00
1.94
18.00
2.00
4,17
0,02
22040.34
11361.00
0,47
0.47
631.17
5304,00
2.73
14.00
2.00
3.81
0.10
4318.86
15B2.DO
0.72
0.71
113.00
604,00
16
-------
LAKE »AMEI ANADOR RBB..
3TOPET NUMBED I 0601
TAXA
ANKISTRIJDESHUB FALCATUf
APHANIZOMCNON flOS-AOUAE
A8TCRIUIIELLA FORMOSA
CENTRIC DIATOM
CERATIUN HIHUND1NFLLA
F. BRACHJCERAS
CHLOROPHTTAN LUNATE CELL
CNROOMOHAS T ACUTA
COELA1TDUM RFTICULATUM
COELABTRVM SPH»tP,lCU«
COELOSPHAFRIUM KUETMNGIANUN
CRYPTOMONA8
CtCLOTELLA MENfOHIMIAHA
FRAGILARIA
FRAGILARIA CROTONEMSI8
CLIMODINIUH It
CONTINUED
OJ 14 75
Ot It 78
11 II 79
MEL08IRA DISTANS
MELOSIRA CRANULATA
MCLOBIRA ORANULATA
V. AMGU«TIS8IMA
MELOSIRA GRANULATA
T. »MOU8tI881H» f, SPIRAHf
MELOS1RA 1TALICA
MCtOStRA VARIANS
HITtSCHIA VERMICULARI8
OOCVITI8
PERIDINH'M
8UtHCDEIHU> BIJUGA
•TAURASTRUM
ITEPHAHODI8CUS
8TMCDRA ACU8
TETRAEDRON MINIMUM
T. 8CROBICULATVM
TOtAL
FORM
CCL
rji
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEt
CEL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
Ctb
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
COL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
8
2
1
4
S
1
%c
o.«
98.0
0.8
0.1
0.0
0.1
o.J
ALGAL
UNITS
P*R MI,
421
tmi
S61
84
X
18
X
112
X
X
2J4
8
1
51
4
1
2
}
%C.
O.JI
O.tl
12.1
0.1
0.1
1.2
48.7
o.«
2.1
11. (
0.1
0.1
0.8
ALGAL
UNIT*
PF.R ML
11
8S
X
X
1175
11
11
X
160
5104
X
i 88
I 262
1 1700
1 11
\ *J
1 *
|
1 «9
•
4
1
2
5
1
ALGAL
UNIT*
»C PER ML
1
1
1 X
1
1
l.tl 29
10.91 171
1
1
1
*.ll 144
1
1 X
1 X
•.II 144
1
7.11 111
14.51 210
1
I. II 29
5,41 5t
18,21 604
1 T
1 *
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.91 29
70K1
1582
17
-------
LAKE NAME I BOCA LAKE
STORET NHMBERl 0602
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 09 75 06 30 75 11 04 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
DIATOM
COMPOUND
02/0 E
0/0 0
0.50 £
1.00 E
07/0 E
02/0 E
0/0 0
0.50 E
0.33 E
04/0 E
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
0.25 *
02/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 09 75 06 30 75 11 04 75
GENUS
SPECIES
06
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 06 09 75 06 30 75 11 04 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 8
NUMBER Or SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY 0
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUA16/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML Or MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
2,*6
14.00
3,00
3.81
0.28
1276,80
460,00
0,70
o.ta
34,29
120.00
1.84
9.00
2.00
3.17
0.29
471,04
256,00
0.58
0,54
28.44
114,00
2.04
8.00
2.00
3.00
0.06
2831.52
1388,00
0.68
0.68
173.50
646.00
18
-------
LAKE NAMEl BOCA LAKE
8TORCT NUMBERI 060}
TAXA
ANABAENA
ANRISTRODESMU8 MLCATUS
ASTCRIONELLA FORMOSA
CENTRIC DIATOM
CHROOHONAH T ACUTA
CRTTPTONONAS EHOSA
CRTPTOMONAS SPP.
CUNOPHYTAN ULAMEHT
CKLOTELIA BODANICA
OACTTLOCOCCOPSIS
DINOBRrON DIVERGENS
rRACILARIA BRCYI.1TRIATA
rRACILARIA CROTUNCN8IH
HCL08IRA II
MCLOSIRA IIALICA
MCLnaiR* VARIAN8
08CILLATORIA
STEPHANODIBCUS
IINCDRA
8IMCDRA CTCIOPUM
TARELLARII rENCBTRATA
TRACHCLOMONA8 VOLVOCIHA
TOTAL
CONTINVCD
06 09 78
0» 10 TS
11 04 78
4
FORM
FIL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
TIL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
riL
CEL
CCL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
S 1C PER ML
I 1 X
1 1
SI (.21 10
2112,51 (0
111,71 90
41 t.ll 10
1
12,8
11,7
X
X
SO
X
90
X
X
ALOAL
UNITS
S »C PER ML
2
4
1
12.1
44. S
22.1
81
114
X
X
X
X
57
ALOAL
UNITS
8 %C PCR ML
4
8
1
2
9.1
14.0
11.*
II. *
X
12*
194
1C1
X
X
J5»
CEL 11128,01 120 |l|10.9t 31 IU4«.8| (4t
CCL 1 1 1 XII 1 XII 1
4«0 256 11»»
19
-------
LAKE NAME! LAKE BRITTQN
STORET NUMBER! 0603
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 26 75 0? 14 75 It 03 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
KUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 U
0/0 0
01/0 E
0,44 E
05/0 E
03/0 fc!
02/0 E
0.20 ?
0.50 E
09/0 E
01/0 E
03/0 E
0/04 ?
0.87 E
08/0 E
?At*!ER"S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 26 7$ 07 14 75 11 03 75
CENUS
SPECIES
00
00
03
01
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA S
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML K
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INOJCVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
03 26 75 07 14 75 11 03 75
0.77
15.00
3.00
3.91
0.54
187.11
243.00
0,20
0.07
16.20
189.00
a.57
18.00
3.00
4.17
0.10
8370.01
209J.OU
0.62
0.61
116.28
906.00
2.03
18.00
3.00
4.17
0.52
639.45
115.00
0.49
0.42
17.50
138.00
20
-------
LAKE NAME! LAKE BRITTCH
8TORET NUMBER! 060)
TAXA
ANABACNA II
ANABACNA 13
A«KISTRODE8MU8 FALCATIM
T. ACICULARia
APHANIZDMEHON fLOa-AQUAC
A8TERIONELLA FORMOSA
CENTRIC DIATOM
CHACTOCCROB
CHROOMONA8 1 kCUTA
COCCONKK PLACENTULA
CRYPTUMnNAB ERU6A
CTMATOPLEURA 80LEA
DIATOM* VULGARC
DICTYOSPHAERIUH PIILCHCLLUM
EUDQRINA ELCGAN8
rUGLENA
FRAGIbARIA CAPUCINA
V. MCAOLEPTA
TRAGILARIA CPOTOHHIdlS
rRAUILARIA 1NFLATA
GOLENKINIA RADIATA
GOMPHONEMA
MEL08IRA It
MEL08IRA GRANUI.ATA
V. ANCU8T18SIMA
MEtOBtRA VARIAMS
MER1DION CIRCULAR!
NAVICULA
N1TX8CHIA II
NITI8CNII *2
DOCI8TI8
OSCILLATOH1A
PENNATR DIATOM II
VBNttkTE DIATOM 12
KNOIC08PHENIA CURVAIk
•TEPHA*oni8CUS
8TNEDKA UL*A
TRACHKLONONAi
ULOTHRIX
TUTAL
CONTIKUCD
0] 26 TS
07 14 7B
II 01 TS
FORM
fit
flL
CCL
riL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
COL
COL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
riL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
riL
ALGAL
U*IT*
8 %C PER ML
t
2
77, •
22.1
119
54
j(
X
*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 »C PER ML
2119.41 406
I
4
1
X 11
1
1
l.SI 11
4.8
*,0
1.9
8,0
1.8
4.8
41.1
X
94
128
11
X
135
X
It
X
94
906
X
X
10.81 21*
1 X
l.SI 11
ALGAL
VNIT8
8 »C PER ML
2
8
4
1
1
12.4
12.4
8.1
41.8
28.1
X
19
19
X
20
X
X
X
119
X
X
X
X
X
19
X
X
X
241
2091
118
21
-------
LAKE NAMEt CASITAS RF.3.
STORE! NUMBERI 0604
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 24 75 11 13 73
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
04/0 E
0/04 7
0/0 7
04/0 E
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 7
0/0 7
01/0 C
02/0 E
05/0 E
0/07 7
2.00 E
09/0 E
PALMER IS ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 24 75 11 13 75
GF.NUB
SPECIES
06
03
00
00
08
03
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 24 75 11 13 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF IKDIVIDUAT.S/ML M
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUA.LS/TAXA U
NUMBER/ML OK MUST ABUNDANT TAXON K
1.46
6.00
4.00
2.58
0,09
870.16
596.00
0.57
0.56
99.33
268.00
0,24
6.00
4.00
2.58
0.02
743,52
3098,00
0.09
0.09
516.33
2973.00
2.35
15.00
4.00
3.91
0,07
6276,85
2671,00
0,60
0.60
178,07
1453,00
22
-------
LAKE NAMCi CA8ITAB RES.
8TORET NUMBRRI 0«04
CONTINUED
03 07 7*
OS 14 7S
11 11 75
ANABAENA
MKI8TRODEBMUS FALCATUS
KPHANIZtlHENUN FLOS-XIUAE
CERATIUM HIRUND1NEU.A
P. FURCOIDES
CHROOMONAS
CHRDOMONAS T ACUTA
CRIPTONCWAB FROSA
CYCLOTELLA
CTST
DINOBRYON DIVERCEN8
DINORRYON SOCIAL*!
DINOBRYON 8PP.
FRAOILARIA INTERMEDIA ?
GOLENKINIA
LACERHE1MIA 8UBSAL8*
MEIiOSJRA DISTAN8
08CILLATORZA
PERIDINIUM QUADRIDEK8
8CENEDERHU8 BIJUGA
BCRNEPE8MU8 BIJUGA
V. ULTFRNANS
BPHACRDCY8TIR 8CHROITCPI
TETRAEDRON MINIMUM
TETRAEDRON MINIMUM
V. BCROBICULATUM
TOTAL
FORM
rii
CEL
FIL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CtL
CEL
CEL
CEL
C£L
cri,
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
FIL
CCL
COL
COL
COL
CCL
CCL
8
2
1
1
%C
1
40.1
45. 0
14.9
UNITS
PER Mt,
219
2(8
X
89
X
X
S9«
8
2
1
»c
4.0
96.0
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
X
X
US
X
X
2971
J09D
8
4
2
1
»
1
ALGAL
UNITS
1C PER ML
1 1
1 5.71 182
J X
I
1 X
1.4! 229
1
S.7I 182
54.41 1411
1 X
1
1
1
1 X
.41 It
.41 It
1 .41 IDS
.41 It
.11 114
.11 1M
1.4 It
2«71
23
-------
LAKE NAMEl CROWLEY
6TORET NUMBER I 0605
NYGHARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 10 75 06 30 75 U 05 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHliOROPHYCEAK
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
01/0 E
0/02 ?
0/04 ?
02/0 E
02/0 E
01/0 E
0/03 ?
1.00 E
06/0 E
2.00 E
0.50 T
0/05 7
0,40 E
3.BO E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 10 75 06 30 75 11 05 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
05
00
05
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 06 10 75 06 30 75 It 05 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OP MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
M
XH
NH
0
K
J
RJ
L
K
1.96
9.00
2,00
3.17
0,04
4443.32
2267,00
0,C2
0.62
251.19
1049.00
2.89
12.00
3,00
3,58
0,04
11577.34
4006.00
0.81
0,81
333.83
892,00
2,27
17,00
3.00
4,09
0.17
2483. 38
1094,00
0.56
0.54
64.35
421,00
24
-------
l»KI NAME I CROWbET b*KE
ITORET NUMBER! OtOS
TAX*
ANABACNA
APHANItONENOM FLOS-AQUA*
AflTERIOMCLLA FORMOSA
CHbAHYDOMONAS
CHHDOMONAS
CHROOMONA8 I ArUTA
COBMARIUM
CRYPTOMONAS
CYCLOTELLA
DIATOMA
DINOBRYON DI?ERGEMS
ElAKATOTHRIX VIR1DIS
ENTOMOKEIS ORNATA
CONTINUED
PS 10 If
01 10 IS
II Oi IS
rRAQILADIA CROTONE1SM
OYROSIOMA f
NCLOIIRA CRANULATA
V. AN6USTI8SIKA
MICROCYSTI8 INCERTA
OeCILLATOIUA
PCDIASYRUM BORTANUM
PCHNATE DIATOM
RHOPALODIA CJbBA
4
S
X 1
7,»
1.1
6.4
1.1
It*
4S
X
2SI
114
14. S| BIO
1
AliOAb
UNITS
* %C PER Nb
1 1 X
2111,91 421
B
1
4
IS. 4
>.4
20.4
l>.t
X
ICI
X
11
X
»s
X
X
X
140
X
X
X
X
1.11 4S 11110.11 111
1 III
2267 400« 10*4
25
-------
LAKE NAME I DON PEDRO HES.
SXORET NUMBER! 0606
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 11 75 06 25 75 11 12 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 ?
0,67 E
0270 E
3.00 £
9,00 E
0/11 7
3.00 E
17.0 E
02/0 E
0/0 0
0.50 E
1.50 E
06/0 E
PALMER*S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 11 75 06 35 75 11 13 75
GENUS
SPECIES
01
00
03
03
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER Or SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OP MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
03 11 75 06 35 75 11 13 75
2.14
14.00
5.00
3.81
0.36
773,54
361.00
0.56
o.sa
35.79
171,00
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.03
7.00
5.00
3.81
0.04
3142.00
3100.00
0.36
0.36
300.00
1543,00
1.56
28.00
5.00
4.81
0.12
4747.08
3043.00
0.33
0.31
108.68
2260.00
26
-------
LAKE (UNI I DON PEDRO RES.
8TORET NVMBERI 0»0»
TAXA
ANABAENA it
ANABAKNA II
ANKISTROPE8MUS FAbCATUS
ASTERtONELLA FORMOSA
ATTHEYA IACHARIASI
CENTRIC DIATOMS
CERATIUH HIR'JNOIHELLA
CERATIUM HIRUNOINELL*
r. ruRcoiDEs
CHLAMfDOMONAS DIHOBRTONII
CHROOWOHA8 T ACUTA
COELASTRUH SPHAERICUM
CRUCIGKHIA TETRAPBPIA
CONTINUED
CICLOTELL* «TELLIOER*
PIHOBRTOM iAVARICUt
UINOBRYOK D1VERGCNS
EPITHKNIA
FPAOILARIA CROTOrtEM«IS
GLENODIHIUM
ClOEOCYSTIi PUftCTONKA
MEL08IRA DISTAN8
KEt,08IR» e«»NUt.ATA
V. ANGUSTIS8IMA
MCMJ8IRH GRANUlATA
V. ANGUSTIS8IMA T. SPIRALW
MtCROCTSTlS INCERTA
01 11 TS
06 39 TH
11 11 TS
OOCYBtIS
PEOIA8TRUN TETRAS
V, tETRAODON
PEKIOIHIUM
SCENEDCSHUS BIJU6A
•PHAEROCTStl* 8CHROETERI
STAURAITRUM
TETRAKDROW MINIMUM
». BCRORftULATUH
TR»CHELOMOHAH VUbVUCIHA
TREUBARIA SET1GERUH
TOTAL
ORM
• •»••••
FIL
«t
CEL
CEt
CEL
CEL
CEL
CM.
CEt
COL
CIL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL,
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
COI.
COL
COL
cet
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
8 %C PER ML
i
2
1
71. S
»il
11.4
X
1541
107
X
X
450
X
ALGAL
UNITS
S «C PER HL
41 J.U »»
S
1
1
J
1
1
1
1
1 X
1.01 «1
1.01 92
1 X
4. SI IH
1.11 «»
1
O.SI 21
1 X
7. SI 131
O.I
74.1
l.S
X
X
11
X
X
X
X
X
12SO
X
X
X
X
4»
X
X
A
ALQAL
WRITS
S %C PER NL
1
4
2
1
S
1
47.4
10. S
S.I
15.1
19.*
S.I
X
X'
m
11
X
19
X
X
S7
S7
X
X
19
x
2110 1041 W
27
-------
LAKE NAME* LAKE ELSINORE
STORET NUMBER! 0607
NYGAARO TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 2J 79 11 19 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGIENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/01 0
4.00 E
0.25 E
01/0 E
6.00 C
4,00 E
3,00 E
0,14 7
0.20 ?
9,00 E
05/0 E
09/0 E
0,07 7
0.33 E
16X0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 23 75 11 13 75
GENUS
SPECIES
13
05
17
05
10
09
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 33 75 11 13 78
AVERAGE: DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML Of MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.15
12.00
6.00
3.58
0,00
160350,25
139435,00
0,32
0,33
11619, 59
98993,00
1.86
IB, 00
6,00
4.17
0.01
35823.HO
19260,00
0,45
0.45
1070.00
10045.00
1.94
20,00
6.0Q
4.32
0.00
274337.16
141514.00
0.45
0.4S
7078,70
79650.00
28
-------
LAKE NAME I LAKH EI,»1NORE
STORET NUMBERI OSOl
TAX*
AWARAENOP8IS CIRCULARIB
ANKIBTRUDC3MU8 T
AHKIBTRUIIEBHUS rALCATUB
CHLAHIDOMOIIAS »l
CHLAMYDONOHA8 12
CHLOROCOCCALEAM CELL
CHIOROCONIUM
CHtOROPHlfTAN LUSATE CELL
CLOSTERIim
COCCONEtS
CRIPTONOm EROBA
CKLOTELU MENECHINIANA
CILINDROTHECA GRACILI8
CTMBCLLA
EUCLtHA
6LCNODINIUM EDAX
CLPEOCAPSA
LACEIIHEIHtk ClLIATk
V. MINOR
H8BRHKIHIA QUADRIBETA
KERIIHOPCOIA MINIMA
HICROCtStli INCERTA
NITI8CHIA
NtTZSCMIA LONCIS9IMA
V. RKVERSk
OOCY8II8
OSCILLATORIk II
OSCILLATORIA 12
PENKATC DIATOM II
aCKNEDESMUS
SCEMEDE3MUS SIJUCA
8CBHEDISHU8 OUADRICAUDA
TCTRAITRUM GLABHUH
TOTAL
CONTINUED
01 JO 7S
0» 23
11 11 71
rORM
rn.
CEIi
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CCL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CCL
flL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
COL
ALGAL
UNITS
8 «C PER ML
2
1
S
4
3
24.4
71,0
o.«
0.6
0.1
1.6
l.«
0.1
34004
98993
90S
105
201
2211
2213
201
X
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
S *C PER ML
1127.41 5711
3112.91 24tS
2IS2.2I 1004S
4
S
1
|
0.31 S2
1.11 207
IV
*
I x
2.1! *14
IV
*
0.31 53
0.31 S3
I
i X
1 *
1
1
'
1
| V
1 A
0.9| 1SS
0.9| 1SS
'
1.9| J6J
1
1
|
1 X
l *
1 X
ALGAL
UK ITS
8 %C PER ML
21
S
3
1
4
1.31 3190
...
19.0
J»,3
O.I
0.1
1.1
s.s
t>6«3
35S19
796SO
1061
X
X
193
X
X
11406
X
X
X
7711
X
0.1 97
1
,„«„ 19260 ««!»»«
29
-------
LAKE NAME! FALLEN LEAF LAKE
STORE! NUMBERI 0608
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 09 18 75 07 02 79 11 OS 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 7
1.00 E
03/0 V
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
1.00 E
02/0 E
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 ?
O.SO E
01/0 E
PALMER IS ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE OS 18 75 07 02 75 11 05 75
GENUS
SPECIES
09
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 01 18 75 07 02 75 11 05 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM 'DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
H
tXH
;NH
D
K
J
RJ
It
K
2.63
10.00
5.00
3.32
0.12
2219.72
844.00
0.79
0.79
84.40
205.00
1.50
4.00
4.00
2.00
0.50
60,00
40.00
0.75
0.67
10.00
20.00
0.92
9,00
5,00
3.17
0.91
58.88
64.00
0.29
0.01
7.11
43.00
30
-------
LAKE NAMBl FALLEN LEAF LAKE
• TORET NUMBER I 0«OI
TAX*
CERAflUH HIRUNnlKELLA
CHLAMYDOMONA8
CHROOMONAft
COCCONEIS PLACENTULA
CHYPTOMONAS EROSA
CYCLOTELLA
CYCLOTELLA STELLIGERA
DINOBRtON
DIHOBRYON IQCIALE
DINOrLAGELLATE CYST
FRACILARIA CROTONENSIS
GLENODINIUM t
CYHNOrlHIUM
GYMNODINIUM DROINATUM
KEL08IRA ITAtICA
HAVICULA
KITISCHIA
OOCYBTIS
PERIOINIUM INCON8PICUUN
RHOPALODIA GIMBA
BYNEDRA
TOTAL
CONTINUED
01
7S
OT 01 7»
11 OS 71
FORM
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEl
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
S %C PER ML
1 1
SI
1
4
I
2
10, *| 91
|
24.31 20$
11. S| 114
1 X
1
19.01 t«0
1
1
I
2.71 2J
10.8| 91
1 *
19.01 1«0
1
1
1 X
ALGAL
UNITS
S »C PER ML
2
1
2S.O
25.0
10
10
1 11ISO.OI 20
ALGAL
UNITS
S «C PER ML
1
1
67,9
11. •
.
X
43
v
X
Jl
X
X
X
X
144
31
-------
LAKE NAMEl LAKE HENNESSEY
STORET NUMBERl 0609
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 11 75 06 26 75 11 la 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUflLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
06/0 E
0/07 ?
3.50 E
12/0 E
1.00 E
6.00 E
0/07 ?
1.00 E
10.0 G
2.00 t
4.00 E
0/06 t
0.50 C
9.00 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE OJ 13 75 06 26 75 11 12 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
03
03
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 13 75 06 26 75 11 12 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER Or INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVF1NNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALB/TAXA
NUMBER/ML C1F MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
M
iXH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.62
17.00
2.00
4.09
0.09
1831.06
2233.00
0,20
0,19
131.35
1951.00
2.66
20.00
3.00
4,32
0.10
6689.90
2515.00
0.62
0.61
125.75
780.00
1.78
19,00
3.00
4.25
0.41
797.44
448.00
0.42
0.36
23.56
262,00
32
-------
LAKE MANEI LAKE HEHNE8BBT
•TORET NUMBER I 0»0»
TAXA
MABAENA
AKKIBTPODeiMUB FALCATU8
APIUNIZOMGNON FLns-»ouAE
ABTERIONELLA FORMOSA
ATTHETA Z»CH»RIASI
CB»ATIUH HIRUHDIHELLA
CKHATIUM HIRUNDIHELLA
r, ruRcoioE*
CHROOMONA8
CHRDOMOIIAS T ACUTA
CLOSTERIUM
COEI.A8TRU* MICROPORUM
COELAMRUM RETICULATUM
CRUCIOENIk tETBAPEOIA
CRTPTOMOHAS
CTCLOTELLA MENECHINIINA
DINOBRION (OCUIiE
EPtTHEMIA
rLIOELLAIE
FBACIIARIA CROTOMEMSI8
ObEIIODINIUM EOAX
QLOEOCT8TIB
COMPHOHEH* TRUNCHTUM
COHTIMUEO
01 II TS
06 J* 73
II 11 IS
MEL081RA DI8TAN8
HELU8IRA ORANUtATA
MELOBIRA VARIAH8
OOCTSTI8
PEDIA8TRUH TETRA8
V. TETHAODON
RHOPALODIA BIBBA
8CENEDC8HU8 BIJUCA
•CEKtDttHUt INTERMEDIU8
T. BKAUDATUI
8TAURA8TRUM
•TEPNADOOIBCUS
8YNEDRA
TETRKEORON CON8TPICTUM
TIfRAEDRON MINIMUM
V. ICROBICULATUM
TOTAL
FORM
Tit
CEL
rlt
CEti
CEt
CEti
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
ALCAL
UNITB
8 %C PER ML
1
a
i
s
4
1
4.7
17.4
).«
o.«
U«
0,1
X
X
IDS
IfSt
II
X
X
11
X
X
X
X
X
X
1»
IB
o.ii !•
ALGAL
UNIT*
8 %C PER ML
I
4
1
S
2
a, oi so
JS.OI «S4
1.01 BO
20.0
4,0
2.0
2.0
11.0
6,0
1.0
1.0
1.0
A
«
X
501
101
SO
SO
w
710
IS!
76
2S
g
X
2S
ALGAL
UNITS
8 tC PER ML
SI
21
4
1
1
1
l.ll
16,71
1.1
SI.S
I.J
X
17
71
X
17
262
17
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2211
asts
441
33
-------
LAKE NAMEl LAKE HENSHAW
STORET NUMBER! 0610
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 23 75 11 13 79
MYXOPHYCEAN 0/03 0 1.50 E 1,00 E
CHLOKOPHYCEAN 3.00 C 2.25 E 2.25 E
EUGLENOPHYTE 0/06 ? 0.13 7 0.23 E
DIATOM 0.57 E 1.00 E 0,31 E
COMPOUND 5.00 E 5.00 E 5,00 E
PALMER IS ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 23 75 11 13 75
GENUS 05 03 11
SPECIES 05 03 03
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 07 15 06 23 75 11 13 78
AVfcRAGt DIVERSITY H l.OB 2.98 3.02
NUMBER OF TAXA 8 22.00 31,00 39.00
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M 2,00 2.00 2.00
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH 4.46 4,95 5.29
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH 0,03 0.12 0.20
TOTAL DIVERSITY D 9958.68 972S.70 7112,10
TOTAL NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/ML N 9221.00 326S.OO 2355.00
EVENNESS COMPONENT J 0,24 0,60 0.57
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ 0,24 0.60 0.56
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/tAXA L 419,14 105,32 60,38
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT T»XON K 7701.00 987,00 6B1.00
34
-------
LAKE NAMCl LIKE HCM8HDN
8TORET NUMBER! 0610
TAX*
•NABAENA
ANABAENOPB18 CIRCULAR!*
ANKISTRODE8MUB FALCATUB
APHANIZOMENUN FLOS-AQUAE
CCRATIUM HIRUNOIHELLA
r. ruRcoiDE8
CHROOMONAS 1 ACUTA
CL08TCRIUM II
ClOSTERIUM 12
Ct/OaTCRIUM f]
CLOSTERIUH 14
COCCONETB Pt«CE*TUL.«.
COELASTRUM
COCLA8TRUN NICROPORUM
CRYPTOMOHAB
CRYPTOMONAS EROSA
CYCLOTCLLA HENEQHINIANA
CYMATOPLEUHA SOLE*
DIPLONEI8
ELAKATOTHRIX CELATINOSA
EbAKATQTHRIX VJRIDIS
EPITHEMIA
EUCLCNA
GLCNOOINIUM GYMNOniNIUH
COMPHQUEM*
GONPHONEMA TRUNCATUM
KIRCHNERICLLA CONTORTA
NALLOHONA8
MEL08IR* II
MEL08IRA ORANUI.ATA
Mtl.OSIRA VAP.IAN8
HIRISMOMDIA HINIKS
MICP.OCISTIB AtRUCINOBA
MICROCT8TIS INCBrtTA
NATICULA II
HAVICULA 12
fAVICULA II
NITZ8CHIA
NITIBCHIA VERHICULANia
OOCY8TIS
08CILLATORIA
PEDIASTHUH BORYANUM
PEDIABTRUM DUPLEX
V. MCTICUI.ATUM
PEOIASTRUN SIMPLEX
V. DUODENARIUM
PHACU8 HEliIKOinCB
PINNULARIA
PLEUR08IGMA
RHOPAbODIA GIBBA
SCHROEDERIA SETIOIRA
8PHACROCT8TI8 8CHROETERI
8TAURABTRUH II
8TAURASTRUM 12
8TEPHANODIBCUS
8URIRELLA
SURIRRtiliA OVATA
8INEDRA
8YNEORA ACU8
TETRAEDRON TRICONUM
V. ORACILE
TRACHELOMONAS
TRACHELOMONAS VOLVnCINA
TOTAL
CORTIIIUED
01 07 7S
0* II 75
11 II 7»
FORM
ni
Fit
CtL
FIL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CtL
CtL
CtL
CCL
COL
COL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CEIr
CCL
CCL
cei
CCL
CCL
CCL
CEL
COL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCIi
COti
COL
COL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEI.
ceii
CCL
riL
-------
LAKE NAME! IRON GATE RES.
8TORET NUMBERI 0611
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATS 03 27 79 07 16 75 10 31 79
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
1.00 E
o.ia ?
03/0 E
I MYX*
CHL»
EUG«
DIA«
CNPD"
03/0 C
0/0 0
0/03 7
3.00 E
06/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 27 78 07 16 79 10 31 79
GENUS
SPECIES
OS
00
03
00
OS
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 27 75 07 16 75 10 31 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINN
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OP IKDIVIDtfAtS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAX*
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
iXH
:HH
0
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.39
14.00
2.00
3.81
0.05
5993.54
3706,00
0.42
0,41
264.71
1976,00
1.67
8.00
2,00
3.00
0,11
1152,30
690,00
0,56
0,54
66,25
435.00
2.14
9.00
2.00
3.17
0,23
740.44
346.00
o.«e
0.69
38,44
133,00
36
-------
LAKE NAMEl IRON CATE RM.
STOHET NUHBCRI 0611
TAX*
AHA8AENA
APHAmOMeNON ftOS-AOUAE
A8TERIONELLA roRHOSA
CHPOOMONA8 7 ACUTA
CRIPTOMONAS CR08A
COMTIHUED
01 27 78
07
78
10 II 75
FMAGILAIIIA
FRACILARIA CONSTRMENS
rRAGILARlA LEPT08TAURO»
CLCKODIHIUH MAX
HAHTT8CHIA
MCLOSIRA eRANULATA
V. AKCUSTISIIMA
08CILLATORIA II
OSCIbLATORIA 12
PENNATI DIATOM II
MHOICOaPHtNIA CURVATA
SCeHtOlSHUS ACUMINAtU*
flCHRDtDEHIA SCTICERA
STEPHANODI8CUI
8TEPHAHODI8CW* ASIRAEA
V. KINUIULA
8URIHCU.A OVATA
8IHEDRA II
8INEDRA C1CLOPUN
TOTAL
FORK
rtL
riL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
riL
riL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
8 %C PER ML
1
1
4
S
2
(.7
81.1
1.7
O.t
1.7
js.o
X
247
im
«2
X
X
11
X
tl
X
X
12*7
X
0,11 11
1
ALOAL
UNITS
8 *C PER ML
1 1 X
21 5.21 !<
'
S
J
1
«u*
10. <
SJ.O
10. «
73
X
71
419
X
71
ALOAL
UNIT*
I 1C PER ML
1 i
ltli.ll SI
S
1
»
4
7.S
21.1
11.4
IS.l
J7
10
X
x
I!)
SI
x
1706
JU
37
-------
LAKE NAMEl LONER KLAHftTH LAKE
STORET NUMBERI 0613
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 03 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCBAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
1.50 K
5.00 E
0/13 ?
0.16 ?
e.oo E
PALMER 18 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 03 75
GENUS
SPECIES
06
04
AVEIUGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL8/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
SPECIES DTVERSITY AMD ABUNDANCE INDICES
06 03 75
2.06
39.00
1.00
5.29
0.27
3464.92
1682.00
0.39
0.36
43.13
1029.00
38
-------
LAKE NANEr bOWBR KbAMATH LAKE
8T01ET NUMBER I 061}
TAX*
ACHNANTHES
ANABAEMA
ANKI8TRODCSHUS rALCATUS
ANMSTRDDESNU* rALCATU*
V. MIRABIbIB
ANOMOEONm COSTAT*
APHANOCAPSA ELACHISTA
CALUNEIS
CHbUROPHYTAN COCCOID CELL
CbOSTERIUM
COSHAHIUM
CYCbOTEbbA BODANICA
V. «T«XLA
CTCLOTEliLA MENECH1HIANA
CTMRELLA
CYMBtttA MCXICANA
CYMBELI.A MINUT*
EPITHCHIA TUHCIDA
aOHPHOHEMA PARVUbllH
HANIISCHIA AMPMIOXIR
F. CAPITATA
HBL08IBA ITALIC*
NAVICUtA CU5PIDATA
MAVlCUbA TRIPUNCTATA
V. aCNIZOHEMQIDES
NITZ4CNIA
HITZ8CHIA TRYBLIONELLA
OOCY8II8
OSCILIiATORIA
PED1A1TRI1H BORYANUH
PEDIA8TROM DUPLEX
V. CLATHRATUM
PINNUIiARIA
RHOPALDDIA GIBBA
1CENI.OC8HUB ACUHtNATUR
SCENEDEIMUB ACUTU8
RCENIDESHUS D1MOHPHU4
aCEREDEBWUR OUtDRICAUDA
BCHROCDERIA BETKiERA
8URIRELLA ANCU8TATA
BURIRCLLA 0«AIA
BIIRIPELLA TENCRA
BYWEDRA ULNA
ULOTHRIX
TOTAL
CONTINUED
OS 0] 19
FORM
CCL
fit
CEb
CEL
CEb
COb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
CEb
COb
rib
COb
COb
CEb
CEb
COb
cob
COL
cot
CEb
CEL
CEb
CEb
CEb
Ptb
s
4
1
1
S
1
tc
3.7
1.*
J,7
61.1
11. t
i.*
l.«
l.«
9,3
1.1
AbCA
UNIT!
PER 1
«
1
1
*
10]
t«
J
3
]
!
1
IS
6
f
>
a
i
i
(
(
t
c
i
(
i
c
c
i
i
t
i
c
(
(
c
i
1
Iftll
39
-------
LAKE NAMEl LOPEZ LAKE
STORET NUMBERl 0614
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 35 75 11 12 75
HVXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
KUGIiENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
0/0 0
2.00 E
O.SO E
04/0 E
1.00 G
3.00 E
0/04 ?
1.00 E
6,00 E
3.00 E
1,50 E
0/07 ?
01/0 E
4,00 E
PALMER 18 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 95 75 11 12 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBEH OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
03 10 75 OR 35 75 11 12 78
H
S
M
,XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1,53
9,00
4,00
J.17
0,11
1345.42
814,00
0.49
0.47
90.44
534.00
2,30
13.00
4.00
3,70
0.16
1989.50
865.00
0.63
0.61
66.54
298.00
3.30
13.00
4.00
1.70
0.22
1315.60
572.00
0.62
0.60
44.00
191.00
40
-------
LAKK NAHRl LOPEZ LAKE
BTORET NUMBER I 0(14
TAXA
ANARAEMA
kMKKTRODESNUS FALCATUS
APHANIZOMENO" rLOS-AOUAB
A8TCRIONELLA rORMOSf
CERATIUK HIHUN01NELLA
CHKOOMOHA8 1 AftTA
CLU8TERIUM
COCCONEIS
CRTPTONONAB
CRYPTOMONAB EH08A
DINOPLACELLATE CTSI
EUOLENA
rLAGEUATE
rRABILARIk CROTOHEH«I8
MEL08IRA
NICROCYST1S AGRUOIMOSA
OOCI8TI8
PHORHIDIUM MUClCOt,*
ACENEDC8MUB INTERHEDIU8
V. IHCAUPATUS
8CHROEDERIA SETIOERA
BTAVRACtNUM
BTEPKANODIBCU8 NIAGARAE
TRACHEI/ONONA8
fOTAL
CONTINUED
01 10 73
DC IS It
it ia 79
POM
TIL
CEL
riL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEl
COL
CEL
riL
COL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL
UHtT*
B %C PCX *L
I
4
1
1
M.6
(.9
1.4
17.2
X
514
X
S6
X
11
140
ALGAL
UNITS
( *C PER ML
1
4
9
1
2S.O
14.9
6,2
9.4
11.7
X
216
X
X
291
94
X
• 1
X
X
162.
t •*
ALCAL
UNITS
• *C PER ML
1
1
»
1
21. a
11,2
11.4
22.1
7.J
X
127
(4
191
X
1»7
x
41
X
X
A 1 • ^ I 91
CEL 121 (.91 »6 111 ».«| " •'• ••"
CEL 1 1 1 XIII III
• 14 ••» '"
41
-------
LAKE NAME| LAKE MARY
STORE! NUMBER I 0615
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 30 75 il 05 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
FUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 T
0,50 E
02/0 E
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 |
0.11 7
01/0 E
PALMER>8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 JO 75 11 05 75
GENUS
SPECIES
02
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 06 30 75 11 05 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML Of MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
1.79
8.00
1.00
3.0U
0.07
2253.tl
1259.00
O.CO
0.59
157,38
568.OQ
a.oo
13.00
1.00
3.70
0.74
1026.00
513.00
0.54
0.51
39.46
215.00
42
-------
LUCE HAHtl LUKE M»R»
8TORET NUMBERI *«!»
CONTINUED
»STERIONr.tL» FORMOSA
CHRUOMONAS T
CRtPTOMJNAS BROS*
CTNBKLLA
DINOBRYOH CYLINDRICUM
DINUBRTON DIVERUKNS
BPITHE11A 8DREX
NEL08IR* ITALIC*
IONOI8BIM*
V. RCVCR8*
8TNRDRA
8KNEDMR ULNA
TABELMRI* FEHESTRAt*
THRkEDRON MINIMUM
TOTkli
CC 10 75
11 05 75
| UNITS 1 U««
COR* 18 « PER Mt 18 %C PER NL
CEL iain.li «•* '«'"•»' Ji»
CEI, isi i.n «i ; ;*•? "
r*iTi. ill 6.41 HI |J|lXi"l BO
It&U I * • "^ B>^ • v
CEL 1 1 1
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CIL
4
1
!.*
45.1
«1
X
X
568
1.11 41
1
5
25.7
1.1
«•
111
r
z
*
X
IT
1159 >»»
43
-------
LAKE NAME I LAKE MENDOCINO
STORET NUMBER I 0616
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 12 75 Oft 26 75 U H 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 ?
2.00 E
03/0 E
03/0 E
04/0 E
0/07 ?
0.25 T
08/0 E
03/0 E
04/0 E
0.14 ?
1.00 E
13/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 12 75 06 26 75 11 11 75
GENUS
SPECIES
01
00
02
03
08
03
SPECIES fJIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 12 75 06 26 75 11 11 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INniVir>UA!,8/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAX* 0
NUMBER/ML Of MOST ABUNDANT TAXOH It
0.62
8.00
2.00
3.00
0.19
229.40
370.00
0.21
0.16
46.25
313.00
0.61
19.00
2.00
4.17
0.15
802.76
1316,00
0.15
0.12
73.11
1108.00
1.94
24.00
3.00
4.59
0,16
3496,18
1797.00
0.42
0.41
74.88
1101.00
44
-------
LAKf NAME I LAKE HENDOCINO
BTOREI NUMBER! 0*1*
TAX*
ACHNAHTHES *ICROCEP«»LA
ANABAENA
ANABAENOPBIB EtENKtWII
ANKISTPODESMUS PALCATUS
V. ACICULARIS
UPDAKIZOMEIION fLOS-AOUAE
CERATIUM HIHUNDJNCbLA
CERAT1UN HIRUNDINBLLA
r. «R»CHICERAS
CHROOMONA8 T
COELOSPHACRIUM 7
CRYPTONONAS EROS*
CRJPTOMONAi MAFSSniUI
CYMBCLLA
EUObENA
PRAGILARIA
rRAGILARIA CROTOMENSIB
Gf^MOOlNIUM OCULATUM
OfKOBIGNA
MBLO«IRA D1BTAN8
MEL08IRA ORANUbATA
HEUOBIRA ITALICA
NEbOBlM VAR1AN8
HITHCHIA
OOCT8TIB
08CILLATORIA LINNETICA
PAHDORIHA MORUM
PERIDIMIUM
PERIDINIUH PEHARDJFORltE
PERIDIIIIUM OUADR1DEM8
HHOPMiDDIA
-------
LAKE NANEI NICASIO RES.
STORE! NUMBER! 0617
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 13 75 06 26 73 H 11 75
MYXUPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
02/0 E
0/0 0
1.00 E
04/0 E
08/0 E
4.00 E
14.0 E
0.11 ?
2,50 E
25.0 E
1.00 E
3.00 E
0,62 E
1.50 E
8,00 E
PALMERi8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 13 75 06 26 75 11 11 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
02
02
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 13 75 06 36 75 tl 11 73
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OP TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM'DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY n
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
MEAN NUMBER OrRSSl"!9SLBmS "2
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT *™M R
1,40
12.00
3.00
3,58
0.18
949,20
678.00
0.39
0.36
56.50
363.60
1.66
30,00
3,00
4.91
0.10
6766,16
4076.00
0,34
0.33
135.87
3007.00
2.S9
22.00
3.00
4.46
0.29
2051.28
792,00
0,58
0.56
36.00
297.00
46
-------
LAKE HANEt HICASIO RES.
•TORET NUMBER! 0«1T
TAX*
ANA8AENA
AHKISTRODESMUS fALCATU*
Y. ACICULARIS
APHAHIZUMENOH rLOB-AQUAE
APHANOCAPSA DELICATtSSIMA
JSTKRIONELLA FORMOSA
CHHOONONA8 7
CLOSTKRIUM
COELASTRUM MICROPnUUM
COELASTBUM PMICULATUM
V. POLKHOBPCm
CRUCIGEHIA CRUCirEPA
CRUCIGENIA OUADRATA
CRTPTOMDNA* EK08A
CYCLOTELLA MENEGHIHIAHA
KUGLEMA EHRENBERGII
GLENtlDIIIIUM GYMHODINI1W
KIBCHNERIELLA
MKL08IRA PT8TAN8
MEL08IRA CRANULATA
MEL08IRA ITALICA
r. CURVATA
NEI.08IRA VAFIANS
HERI8HOPEOJA GtAUCA
HICROCI8TI8 INCEHTA
KAVlCUbA
OOCT8TIR
OSCULkTORIA
08CIIHTDRIA MWieTXCA
rAHDOFINA HOPUM
PCDIA8TBUN BOBTANUM
PEDIA8TRUN DUPLEX
PEDIASTRUM DUPLEX
V, CLkTHRATUM
PEDIASTRUM DUPLEX
». RITICULATUM
PCDIA8TRUN SIMPLEX
V, DUODENARIUN
PHACU8
PHACU8 HELIKOIDE8
PHACU8 TORTU8
8CENEOE8HU8
8CEHEDE8MU8 ARCUATU8
8CEKEDEBHU8 OUAOBICAUDA
8CHBOEDEBIA StTICEPA
8PHAEBOCT8T18 SCHROFTEBI
8IAUBA8TBUM
8TEPHAMODI8CU8
8TEPHAHODI8CU8 KIAGARAE
8TNCDRA
TRACHELOMOKAS HI8PIOA
TRACHELOMONA8 IBTERMCDJA
TRACHELOMONA8 URCEOLATA
TRACHELOMOHAfl VOLVOCIMA
TOTAL
CO*TI«UCO
01 tl
0«
78
11 11
rORM
FIL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
CIL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
rti
riL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
»C PER HI .
11.1
81.4
11.
— —
226
•
J62
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
90
X
ALGAL
UNIT8
»C PER ML
1 0.61 »S
1
1 X
1.71 14»
2.41 99
0.61 25
7.11 «8
1.11
1.0
1.2
0,8
0.6
0.6
0.*
71.1
1.7
80
124
X
X
X
X
80
x
X
X
28
28
X
X
X
25
2S
X
1007
149
ALGAL
UNITS
%C PER ML
12,8
4.2
4.2
17,8
8.»
16.7
12.5
4,»
X
99
11
11
X
297
X
X
66
X
X
112
99
X
X
X
X
X
X
J»
X
X
678
4076
792
47
-------
LAKE NAMEl LOWER OTAY RES.
STORET NUMBER I 06 IB
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 20 75 11 14 79
KYXOPHYCCAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENQPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/01 0
9.00 E
0/09 ?
0,14 7
10.0 E
2.50 E
1.00 E
0.29 E
0.25 ?
5.00 E
3.00 E
9.00 E
0/12 T
0.29 ?
14.0 E
PALMER IS ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 20 75 11 14 75
GENUS
SPECIES
04
00
05
00
16
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 07 75 06 20^75 1,1 14 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAX*
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.28
21.00
2.00
4.39
0.07
9024.24
3958.00
0.52
0.52
188. 40
2170.00
2.32
20.00
2.00
4.32
0.26
1888.40
814.00
0.54
0.51
40.70
370.00
1.62
25.00
2.00
4,64
0,04
16034.76
9898.00
0.3S
0.35
395.92
6873.00
48
-------
LAKE NAMEt LOHFR OTAT RE8,
BTORET NUMBER! 0*11
TAXA
ANABACNA
APHANIZOMENON FLOS-AQUAE
A8TER10NCLLA FORMOSA
CHLANTDOMONA8
CL08TENIUM
COCCONEIS
COEI.A8TRUM H1CPOPOBUM
COSMARIUN
CRTPTOMONAS EROSA
CrCLOTCLLA MENEGHUIANA
CTMBELLA
OACTYLOCOCCOPSIS IKBEGULARia
DICT«08PHAERIUM PULCHELLUM
DIHOBRIOH DIVERCENS
DIPLOP8ALI8 ACUTA
CLAKATOTHRIX GELATIND4A
EPITHCM1A
CPITHENIA 80REX
EUCLENA
FBAOILARIA CROTDNCNSI8
CLSNODIBIUM OCULATUM
GIR08IQMA
NALLONONA8 PSEUDOCORONATA
MEMISIP.A
MCLOSIRA CRANULATA
HERX8NOPEDIA MINIMA
NOUQEOTI1
COMTIIIUED
NITC8CH1* VEMNICULARI8
oocrmi
08CILLATORIA AOARDHII
08C1LLATORIA LtMNKTXCA
PEDIA8TRUN BORTANUM
PEOIA8TP.UN DUPLEX
PEBIDINIUM INCON8P1CUUN
PERIDINIUM OUADRIOENS »
RHOPALOOIA CIBBA
BCCNeDEBMUB
•CENPDI8HU8 BICAUOATU8
8CCNCDC8MU8 IIJUOA
8CCNEI>C8NU8 DIHORPHU8
8CENCDE8NU8 OUADRICAUDA
SCHBOEDERIA 8ETIGERA
CPNAEP.OCT8TI8 SCHROeTERI
8IAURA8TBJM
STEPHANODIBCUI
•UKIPSLLA EI.ECAN8
8URIPELLA OVAXA
8JNEDHA ULHA
TETRAEDRON HTMINUN
TETRACORON MINIMUM
V. SCROBICULATUN
TRACHELOHOKAS
IBEUSARIA TRIAPPCNOICULATA
TOTAL
01 07 75
0* 20 75
II 14 79
TORN
rib
riL
CEL
CtL
CEL
CIt
cot.
en-
CEL
CEt
CEl
CEl
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
GEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCti
CEL
CCL
COL
FIL
CEL
CCL
cet,
PIL
PIL
COL
COL
CEL
CCL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
CCL
COL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CC1
CCL
CCL
CCL
CEL
1
1
18 «C
1 1 1
1 1 1
iim.ii
1 1 1
t 1 1
1 1 1
t 112. SI
1 1 1
121 9.H
1 I t
1 1 1
1 1 1
I 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 t 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 t.OI
t 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
J 1 1
191 «.7I
1 1 1
1 1 1
141 J."l
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 4.11
1 l.tl
1 1
1 I
1 1 1
1 1 1.0|
1 1
1 1.01
1 1
1 t
1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 l.*l
1 1 1
1 1 1
ALGAL I ALGAL
UNITS 1 UNIT8
PCR Ml II *C PER ML
IS| 9.11 74
MI4S.SI 170
2170 I
1
00499
111
X
X
X
IB
X
X
2t«
M2
X
X
Ito
114
11
X
It
X
X
76
4.
11.
«.
9.1
X
17
X
141
74
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
74
X
X
X
1 4. S| IT
1
1
18 1C
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
12114.41
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 i
1 1 1
III l.tl
1 1 1
1 1 1
141 4.41
1 t 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1.11
1 1 1
1 1 0.41
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
111(9.41
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 2.21
1 1 1
1 1 1
lil 1.11
1 1 1
1 1 0.41
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 l.tl
1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
ALOAL
VKIT8
PER ML
1410
X
1*1
X
440
X
X
X
X
110
ts
X
(171
X
X
210
X
230
X
SI
X
X
X
no
X
1991
114
91*1
49
-------
LAKE NAMEl LAKE PIbLSHURY
8TORET NUMBER! 0619
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 12 75 06 26 75 11 11 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
01/0 E
01/0 E
0/0 0
1.00 E
0/01 ?
02/0 E
03/0 E
0/0 0
0/OJ ?
0.75 E
06/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 12 75 06 26 75 11 11 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE: DIVERSITY H
NUMBER Or TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM-DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENHESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIOUALB/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
03 12 75 06 26 75 11 11 75
1.00
2.00
3.00
1.00
0.28
20,00
20,00
1,00
1,00
10.00
10.00
0.41
7.00
3.00
2.91
0.04
815,49
1989.00
0.15
0.14
284,14
1861.00
1.21
16.00
3.00
4,00
0,35
534.82
442,00
0,30
0,24
27.63
331.00
50
-------
LAKE HAMCl LAKE PILLOnURT
8Toner NUMBERi 0*19
TAX*
ANABAENA
ANABACNA CIRCINALIS
CERATIUM HXRUPDINELLA
CHLDROPHTTAM COCCOID CKLL
CHROOMONA8 T
COCCONEIS
CRTPTOKOHAS ER9SA
CRYPTDMONA8 OVAIA
DACTILOCOCCOPSIS IRREGULARIB
EUCLENA
HELOSIRA DI8TAH8
NCLOSIRA CRANULATA
MELD8IRA ITkblCA
HITZRCM1* VERHICULARTS
OSClLliAtQRIA
PAHDORINA MORUM
PCRIOINIUM
•UR1RELL*
•XNEDMA
• IWrDRA. ULNA
TRACHCLONOHAS JNTgRKIDIA
TOTAL
CONTIHUEU
01 13 75
.«$ it 19
11 11 75
FORM
rib
riL
GEL
CEL
cet.
CEL
CEL
CEI.
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEt
CEL
m
COL
CEL
CEL
CEI,
CEL
CEL
JtLOAL
UNITS
S %C .PER ML
1
1
1
1
50.0
50.0
10
10
AtOAt | AtOAt,
UNITS 1 UNITS
S »C_ PER ML IS tC PER ML
1 1 1
11*1. «l ltd 1
2
1.2
X 1
1
14
1
«4 12
X 1
13
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
X 1
1
X 1
1
111 3.11 «4 1
(.4
• •4
1.4
14. »
X
X
X
17
X
17
17
IS
X
X
20
l*t«
442
51
-------
LAKE NAME! SANTO MARGARITA LAKE
STORET NUMBER I 0620
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 35 75 11 12 76
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPKXCEAN
EUGLENQPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 t
0/01 7
0.25 7
02/0 E
4,00 E
2.00 E
0/06 7
0/06 7
6.00 E
05/0 E
01/0 E
0/06 7
0.20 7
07/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 10 75 06 25 75 11 12 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
07
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MUST ABUNDANT TAXON
03 10 75 06 25 75 11 12 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
a
RJ
L
K
0.15
8.00
3.00
3.00
0,02
754,35
5029,00
0,05
0,06
628, «3
4920.00
1.54
19,00
3.00
4.25
0,07
4912,60
3190,00
0,36
0,36
167,89
2181.00
2.68
19.00
3.00
4.25
0.24
2278,00
850.00
0,63
0.61
44,74
304.00
52
-------
LAKE HAMEl BANTU MARGARITA LAKE
8TORIT NUMBER I 0«10
T«X»
ANAMEHA
ANABAENOPSIS CTRCULfPIS
ANKISTRODE8MUS FALCATUB
ANKISTRODCSftUB MLCATUS
V. ACICULARI8
ASTERIONrLLA rORHPS*
CERATIUN HIPUHDIMELIA
r. BRACHICCRAS
CHLOROPHITAN COCCOTD CELL
CLOBTERIUM
COCCONEI8
CRTPTOMONAB EROSA
DACTILOCOCCOPSIS IRREGULARI8
DINUMION BOCIALE
DIPLOMEIS
EPITHENIA
CPITHEMIA BOREX
rRAGILARIA
OLENODINIUM OCIILITIIM
LINOBtA
MCRISHOPEDIA TCNUIB8INA
MOUGEOTIA
NATICULA
NITtBCHIA
OBCIbLAtORIA bIMNETICA
CONTINUED
0} 10 IS
0* JS TS
11 12 TS
PEM1DINIUN IHCON8P1CUUH
PER1DINIUM OUADP.IDKNII
RHOPALODIA OI8BA
•PIROCTRA
BTEPHANOD1SCUS
BINEDRA ULNA
TETRACDRON HINIMUM
TREUBANIA TRIAMBNDICULATA
TOTAL
rORN
fit,
riL
CEL
CtL
CEL
CEL
CEL
Clb
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
TIL
COL
riL
CEL
CEL
riL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
riL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
AL8AL 1 ALGAL
"NITS I UNITS
S %C PER ML IS «C PER ML
97. •
1.1
II 1 X
Ml 4.11 110
X
4930
109
X
X
X
X
X
5.1
(1.4
4.1
X
X
X
t«l
X
X
X
X
am
110
X
X
X
X
IS. 11 4SS
1 X
1.11 fS
1
ALGAL
OMITS
S «C PER ML
1
1 X
1
1
1
1
IT.»I tsa
l.SI 10
l
1 X
l.SI 10
IS, II 104
10. Ti *!
1 X
1
1 X
1
7.91 SI
1 X
l.SI 10
1 X
1 X
1
1 X
1
1
1 X
1
1
4.4i iaa
l.SI 10
1
1
1 X
SOI*
•so
53
-------
LAKE NAMEl LAKE SHASTA
STOKE? NUMBER I 0621
NYCAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 2b 75 07 14 7S 11 03 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 I
l.OG E
03/0 E
0/01 0
0/01 0
0/0 ?
1.00 E
4.00 E
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 T
1.00 E
04/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 26 75 07 14 75 11 0) 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA S
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OP INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
03 26 75 07 14 75 11 03 75
1.03
8,00
7.00
3.00
0.04
2036.31
1977.00
0.34
0.34
247.13
1475.00
1.92
12.00
0.00
3.58
0.48
405.12
211.00
0.54
0.47
17.58
85.00
1.36
8.00
9.00
3.00
0.10
1083.92
797.00
0.45
0.44
99.63
557.00
54
-------
LAKE NAMEl L»*e SHASTA
STORET NUMBGRI 0621
CONTINUED
TAXA
ANABAENA
A8TERIONELLA FORMOSA
CERATIUM HIRUND1NELLA
CHLOROPHtTAN COCCOIO CELLED COLONY
CHROOMONJta T
CRYPTUNONAS
FRAGILARIA CROTONEN8I8
MELOSIRA
MCLOSIRA OI8TANS
NELOBIRA ITALICA
HEL08IRA VHRIAN8
NAVICULA
PERIDIH1UN
RHOPMiOOIA GIBPA
8TAURA8TRUH
8TEPHANODI8CU8
8TNEDRA
8TNEDRA ULNA
TOTAt
0} 2« T5
OT U TJ
II 01 TS
I ALCAt, | ALOAL
1 UDIT8 1 UNITS
rORN 18 1C .PER ML 18 »C_ PER ML
rib 111 i
CEL 12(20.91 411 I
CEL 1
COL 1
CCL 1
CEL 11
CEL 1
CEL I
CCL 1
CEL 1
CEL 1
CEL 1
CEL 14
CEL 1
CEL 1
1.5
1.0
CEL ll|74.«
CEL 1 1
CEL 1 1
1
14
1
90 11
X
X
X
s»
19.9
40.1
X
X
42
es
X
X
X
X
X
X
147S 1)119.9) 41
ALOAL
UNIT8
8 ,«C PER ML
4
1
1
10.0
10.0
69.9
X
X
to
X
10
SS7
I
XII 1 12110.01 10
12119.91 42 1 1 1
1977
211
797
55
-------
LAKE NAMEl SHAVER
STORET NUMBER I 0622
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 04 75 06 24 75 11 13 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E-
0/01 ?
0.3-1 K
03/0 E
0/0 0
05/0 E
0/05 7
0.50 E
06/0 E
01/0 E
01/0 E
0/02 ?
0.20 ?
03/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 04 75 06 24 75 11 13 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 8
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER Or INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL3/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF HOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
06 04 75 06 24 75 11 13 75
2.18
12*00
2.00
3.58
1.11
161.32
74.00
0.61
0.44
6.17
20.00
1.90
13.00
2.00
3.70
0.31
733.40
386.00
0.51
0.47
29.69
193.00
1.16
9.00
2.00
3.17
0.34
254.04
219.00
0.37
0.29
24.33
153.00
56
-------
tAKC NftMEf 8HA*CR
8TORET NUMBERl OSJJ
TAX*
ACHNANTNK8 tANrEOlATA
AHPHORA
INKISTRODCBMUa FALCATUB
V. *CXCUt»RI»
ABTCRIONEttA FORMOSA
CHROOMONA8 T
COCCOIO CELL
GRXPTONONAB
CYCLOTELt*
CIMBtUA NtNUTA
DIHORR7.0N OIVERGENB
•UKAtOfHRIX CttATINOBA
RLENODINIUM OCUliATUN
HMUUCA IRCUI
NALLOMOKAS ACAROIort
HELOIIM
NCL04JM ITALIC*
MAVICULA CU«PIDAT«
NITZtCNIk
IHTMCHIA TERNICULARIS
OOCI8TII
OSCItlKTORIA
PERIDINIOH BIPES
BCHROEDERIA BEIICERA
BPHAEROCTBTI8 BCHROETERI
•INEDRA
BTNCDP.A ULH*
TMCtHRIA FENEBTRATA
TOTAL
0< 04 TS
9t 14 71
II II 79
rORH
CEL
e«.
CtL
eeii
CEt
en
CEL
CEL
CEt
CEt,
COL
CCL
CEL
CEb
CEI.
CCL
CEt
CEt
CEt
cct
Pit
Ctt
CEI
cot
AtCAL
UNITS
• %C PER ML
»,S
J7.0
a».o
X
7
20
X
X
X
X
X
X
90
CEt IIIJ7.0I 20
CCt 141 B.SI 7
CCt 1 1 1
AtCAL
UNITS
8 %C PCM ML
1
1
1
1 X
1
SO, 0| 1»1
1
1,11 19
1
1
l.ll 12
1 X
1 X
1
2B.M »7
1 X
1
1
1
1
1 *
|
1
1 X
1 X
l.ll 12
1
1 X
ALffAL
UMIT8
8 «C PER Ht
1110.01 21
20.1
««.»
44
IB1
X
X
X
X
X
X
74
2lt
57
-------
:,AKE NAME! SILVER UKE
STORET NUMBER I 0623
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 10 75 06 JO 73 11 OS 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 ?
o.u ?
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 1
0.17 ?
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/0 0
0/0 I
0/07 1
0/0 0
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 10 75 06 30 75 11 05 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
02
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OP SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONSNT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER UP INDIVIDUAL8/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
06 10 75 06 30 75 11 05 75
H
8
M
XH
HH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.69
15,00
1,00
3.91
0,26
966,68
572.00
0.43
0,40
30.13
343.00
2. OB
11.00
1.00
3,4b
0.20
1106.56
532.00
0,60
0,58
48.36
228.00
1.36
10,00
1,00
3,32
0.65
153.68
113.00
0.41
0.27
11,30
57.00
58
-------
tAKE KAMI ilLYCR tAKE
8IORET NUMBERI 0«21
TAXA
ACHNAHTHM
ASTERIONEttA FORMOSA
CHROOMONA8 T
CHRUOPMYTAN COCCOtD CEU.
COCCONEX8
CRYPTOMONAC ER08A
CTBI
OINOBRION CYtlNDfllCUM
DINOBRYOM DIVERCENS
CORTIRUEO
PRAGILDNtk CBOTONENSIS
OLENODINZVN
eiENODINtHM OCULATUN
eiROltOHk II
StROSIBM* 12
MEtOSIK* OI4TAN8
NAVICUU
MATICUI.A T
•TNEDM*
•YMKDRA ULNA
T»BELL»RI» FENEITRIT*
TOTAL
06 Iff
06 10 79
II OS 7S
FORM
CEt,
en
CEL
CEt
CEL
CEt
CEt,
CtL
CEL
CEt
CEt
cct
CEt
CEt
cr.t
en
CEL
AtGAI,
UNIT1
a tc PER Mt
1 1 X
11 «,«! 1(
2110.01 J41
4 t,«
1 20,1
X
X
n
X
us
X
X
X
X
X
AtOAb
unit*
1 1C PER Mb
1 1
1114. JI 76
2142.91 22t
1 21.4
X
114
X
X
X
X
ISI14.1I 76
CEt ISI «.M 1* Mt 7.11 Ji
CEt, 1 1 1 XII 1 X
ALOAt
UNIT*
I «C PER Mt
SO. 4
19.1
9.7
X
87
45
11
X
X
X
X
X
X
S72
812
111
59
-------
LAKE NAMEl TULLOCK RES.
STORET NUMBER! 0624
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 14 75 06 25 75 11 13 7S
NYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
03/0 E
02/0 E
0.20 ?
0.75 E
09/0 E
03/0 E
01/0 E
0/04 ?
1.00 E
07/0 E
01/0 E
02/0 E
0/03 T
0,60 t
06/0 E
PALMERi8 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 14 75 06 25 75 11 12 75
GENUS
SPECIES
10
03
OS
00
05
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
MUMPER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
03 14 75 06 25 75 11 13 75
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.34
16.00
9.00
4.00
0.02
22090.24
9436.00
0.59
0.59
589.75
3964.00
2.61
18.00
3.00
4.17
0.20
2565.63
983.00
0.63
0.61
54.61
432.00
2.55
19.00
1.00
4.25
0.34
1425.45
559.00
0.60
0.57
29.42
225.00
60
-------
LAKE Mm I TULLOCK RES.
STORET NUHBERI 0624
CONTIVVKO
01 14 79
0« 2§ 7B
II It It
TAXA
ACHNANIHE8
ANABAENA
ANABAENA II
ANKI8TRODESMV8 MbCATUfl
ANKI8TRODEBNU8 FALCATUS
». icicuLAm
ANKI8TRODESMU8 r*bC*TU(
T. H1RABILIS
A8TERJONELLA FORMOSA
IT. GNACILLIMA
CERATIUM HIRUNDINCLLt
r. BRACK YC EMS
CNROONONAS 1
CRIPTONONAS EROSA
DINORRYON BAVAMICUM
ENTOPONEIS ALATA
EUDORINA ELECAKI
» RAIilbARIA CROTONCNtlB
GLEROOINIIIH
CLENODIMIUM Cr.HMODIHIUM
CLENOOINIIIM CTMNODIRIUN
». BIMUTCLbirORNE
OtENODINIUH OCUL«TUM
NEtOatRA
MEL08IRA DI8TAC8
P»CIt,L»IOIII»
08CILLATORIA LIMNETICA
MHDOftIRA HORVN
»ERIDtNIUN
•EK1DINIUM IWCON8PICVVII
PERIDIMIUM OUADRIDEN8
UeNEDC8HU8 BIJUCA
8PHAEROCT8TIR 8CHROETEKI
•TEPHAHIIDI8CU8
BURIREILA OVATt
•IMEDRA
TNACHELONOMAI INTERMEDIA
TOTAL
FORM
CGb
CEL
CEL
CCIr
eeti
CKL
eel
CEL
Ctl
CEt
CCb
CEb
CEt
COL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
rib
riL
CEb
CEb
CCb
CCL
COL
COL
ALCAL 1 AL6AL
UNITS 1 UNITS
8 1C PER ML JS «C PER ML
3140. «| ll«4 1
*•<
11.1
J.I
1.8
1.1
O.I
1
1
X 1
1
1
1
1
223 1
1
1
200* I
1
1
1
297 1
l»
1
1
149 11
X 1
X 1
1
1
1
X 1
297 1
X 1
74 14
1
1
1
1
X 1
ML HI 7.«l TO |1
CEb 1 1 1 1
CEL ltlll.»l 1711 1
CEL 1 1 1 XI
1
1 X
1 X
1
1
1 X
1
1
41.91 411
1
1
1
1
9.01 79
4.01 19
1.0) 79
1
1 X
8.01 19
1
1
1
1 X
1
1 X
1 X
1
1.01 79
4.0| 1«
1
I X
1 X
1
1
».0| til
I
4.0| 19
1
ALOAL
UNITS
8 1C PER HL
1 X
1
1
«,*! 17
1
1
1
1
«.«! 17
1
1
1
1 X
1
8.81 11
1
1 X
1
1 X
1
1
1
10.01 111
1 X
1 X
1 X
1
40.11 111
1 X
(.*! 17
1 X
1
1 X
J
l.4| 17
1 X
«.*! 17
1
941*
899
61
-------
LAKE KAMEI UPPITP TWTN tAKE
STORET NUMBER! 0625
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 10 75
MYXOPHYCEAN 0/0 0
CHLORQPHYCEAN 01/0 E
EUGLENOPHYTE 0/01 f
DIATOM 0.39 ?
COMPOUND 03/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 06 10 75
GENUS 03
SPECIES 00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 06 10 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H 2.12
NUMBER OF TAXA S 14.00
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M 1.00
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH 3.81
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH 0,25
TOTAL DIVERSITY D 1161.76
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N 546.00
EVENNESS COMPONENT J 0.56
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ 0.53
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L 39.14
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K 375.00
62
-------
LAKE NANEl UPPER THIN LAKE
STORET MOHUERI 0«2S
T«X«
AaTERXONClLA FOkMoaA
CHROONUNA3 I
CRYPIONONA8 ER08A
PINUBRTOR CYLINDRICUM
FRAQILARIA
rRAOILARIA CHOTONENSIS
MELOSIRA ITALIC*
NERIDION CIRCULAR!
PERIDINIUM HILLEI
RHOPALODIA GIBBA
BPHAEROCtSTIS SCHROTTERI
8TEPHAROOIBCUS
BINEDRA
TABELLARIA rENEBTRATA
TOTAL
COHTIHUEO
n« to
FORM
I
la
ALO»L
UNITS
%C PER HI
CEL
CRL
CEL
CIL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CCL
Hi 7.l|
IMS0.2I
.11
J 14.a
141 7.11
HIM.»|
I I I
ITS
J»
7
X
19
71
63
-------
LAKE NAME! LOWER THIN LAKE
STORBT NUMBER! 0626
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 03 19 75
MYXQPHYCEAN 01/0 E
CHLOROPHYCEAN 01/0 E
KUGLENOPHYTE 0/03 ?
DIATOM 0.33 E
COMPOUND 04/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 03 19 79
GENUS 01
SPECIES 00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 03 19 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H 1.94
NUMBER OF TAXA 8 12.00
NUMBCR OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M 1.00
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH 3.58
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH o.sa
TOTAL DIVERSITY D 506.00
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N 275.00
EVENNESS COMPONENT J 0,51
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ 0.46
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L 22.92
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K 122,00
64
-------
LAKE MANCl lOHfH TMIN LAKC CONTINUED
STORET NUMBER I 0626
01 19 75
I ALGAIi
I UNIT!
TAXA FORM |f »C PER Mb
me»ENA rib HMI.II a
A6TIRIOHELLA roRNO<« CEt I I I X
DIHO*PYON DIvePOENS CEt II I X
EMMTOTHRIX GELATIND8A COL III X
rRACILMIA CRUTONCNRIB CEt I I I X
MEtOBIRA ITALICA CEt I1M4.4I 122
PER1DIWIUM HILbEI Ctti I I I X
•TCPHkNODiacus CK. nua.Ji «t
BURTREtLA ELEGAH8 CEL II I X
BTNEDRA CEt I I I X
BYNEDRA UtKA CEL I I I X
TAeELLAAIK rtNESIRAIA CKt 11122.II «1
TOTAL tit
65
-------
LAKE NAME! KIRMAN
»TORET NUMBERI 0627
NYCAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 07 01 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
7.00 E
4.00 E
0/06 7
0/12 ?
6.00 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 07 01 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 07 01 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H 1.68
NUMBER OF TAXA 8 21.00
NUMBER Of SAMPLES COMPOSITED M 1.00
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH 4.39
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH 1,36
TOTAL DIVERSITY D 227.48
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N 121.00
EVENNESS COMPONENT J 0.43
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ 0.18
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L 5,76
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K 44,00
66
-------
LAKE MM I K1RMAK
aTORET RUMBERI 0*37
TAX*
AMPHORA
ANABAIKA
A8TERIONELLA fORHOBA
CEMATIUN HIRUKDINELbA
COCCOHEI8 PLACCNTULA
CRTPIONUNAa EROBA
CIMRCLLA
CITHBEMA TRIAHeULUM
CUHOTIA CURVATA
QDHPHONEHA
OrKOSICMA
NAVICULA
NAVICULA CU1PIDATA
oueiatis
PCUIA8TRUN BORVAHUH
RIVULAR1A }
•CENEDCSMUH B1JUCA
•PHACROCTSTK SCHROCTERI
•TAURA8TRUM
•KMEDRA
aiHEDRA UbRA
TOTAL
CONTINUED
07 01 TS
PORN
CEL
PII.
CCL
CEL
CEt
CEt
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEt
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
ALOAL
UNITE
a %e PER ML
i
K.4
4
ML Ml «.ll It
CEt, I | | X
COt 11117,11 II
CEL 1 1 I X
cet i*i>7, it ii
CEt I 1 1 X
111
67
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
REPORT NO.
EPA-600/3-79-113
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN CALIFORNIA LAKES
5' ftfecerribDer El J79
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
, AUTHORISE
M.K. Morris, W.D. Taylor, L.R. Williams, S.C. Hern
V.W. Lambou, and F.A. Morris
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Las Vegas, NV 89114
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1BD884
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Las Vegas, NV
Office of Research and Development
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, NV 89114
COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/07
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This is a data report presenting the species and abundance of phytoplankton
in the 26 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
California. Results from the calculation of several water quality indices are also
included (Nygaard's Trophic State Index, Palmer's Organic Pollution Index, and
species diversity and abundance indices).
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
*aquatic microbiology
lakes
*phytoplankton
water quality
California
lake eutrophication
Nygaard's trophic indices
Palmer's organic pollu-
tion indices
Species diversity and
abundance
06 C,
08 H
13 B
M
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
74
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
UNCLASSIFIED
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (R«v. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: tW»— 683-282/2216
------- |