NUTRIENT,  BACTERIAL, AND  VIRUS  CONTROL AS
   RELATED TO  GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION

                                     onmental Research Laboratory
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
        Office of Research and Development
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Ada, Oklahoma  74820

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic  Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the "SPECIAL" REPORTS series. This series is
reserved for reports targeted to meet the technical information needs of specific
user groups. The series includes problem-oriented reports, research application
reports, and executive summary documents. Examples include state-of-the-art
analyses, technology assessments, design manuals, user manuals, and reports
on the results of major research and development efforts.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                                  EPA-600/8-77-010
                                                  July 1977
        NUTRIENT,  BACTERIAL,  AND VIRUS  CONTROL

       AS RELATED  TO GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION
                          by
James F. McNabb, William J. Dunlap, and Jack W.  Keeley
             Ground Water Research Branch
   Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
                 Ada, Oklahoma  74820
    ROBERT S  KERR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
          OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
         U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                 ADA, OKLAHOMA  74820

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER


     This report has been reviewed by the Robert S.  Kerr Environmental  Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication.
Mention of trade names or commercial  products does not constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.
                                    11

-------
                                FOREWORD


     The  Environmental Protection Agency was established to coordinate
 administration  of the major Federal programs designed to protect the
 quality of  our  environment.

     An important part of the Agency's effort involves the search for
 information about environmental problems, management techniques, and new
 technologies through which optimum use of the Nation's land and water
 resources can be assured and the threat pollution poses to the welfare
 of the American people can be minimized.

     EPA's Office of Research and Development conducts this search through
 a nationwide network of research facilities.

     As one of these facilities, the Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research
 Laboratory is responsible for the management of programs to:  (a)  investi-
 gate the nature, transport, fate, and management of pollutants in ground
 water; (b) develop and demonstrate methods for treating wastewaters with
 soil and other natural systems; (c) develop and demonstrate pollution con-
 trol technologies for irrigation return flows; (d) develop and demonstrate
 pollution control technologies for animal  production wastes; (e) develop
 and demonstrate technologies to prevent, control or abate pollution from
 the petroleum refining and petrochemical industries; and (f) develop and
 demonstrate technologies to manage pollution resulting from combinations
 of industrial  wastewaters or industrial/municipal wastewaters.

     This report contributes to the knowledge essential if the EPA is to
meet the requirements of environmental  laws that it establish and enforce
 pollution control standards which are reasonable, cost effective, and
 provide adequate protection for the American public.
                                        William C. Galegar
                                             Director
                                    iii

-------
                                  ABSTRACT


     A general introduction provides something of the history of ground-
water, its present use, and the means by which it can become contaminated.
A priority listing of sources of ground-water contamination is presented
for four geographical areas of the United States.

     Phosphorus is discussed in terms of its fate in soil  systems.   The fate
of organic and inorganic nitrogen compounds  is also discussed giving consid-
eration to sorption and biological utilization and degradation.   Criteria
important to the survival  and transport of bacteria and  viruses  is  presented
along with information concerning indicator  organisms in the subsurface
environment.
                                    IV

-------
                            CONTENTS


Foreword	            j^-
Abstract	......'........   iv
Acknowledgment	'.'.'.   vi


INTRODUCTION 	    1
     General	.'!!!!!!    1
     Ground-Water Use	!!!.'!!!!    1
     Ground Water Pollution  	  ......    1

NUTRIENTS IN GROUND WATER  	    4
     Phosphorus	!!!.'."    4
     Nitrogen	    '  '  ]    5
     Bacteria and Viruses  	  .........    7

SOURCES OF EXPERTISE 	   11

BIBLIOGRAPHY 	   13

REFERENCES	17

-------
                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT


     The need for this report was conceived by Mr. Edmond P. Lomasney,
Regional Representative, Office of Research & Development, EPA Region IV,
Atlanta, Georgia.  He guided its development to conform with the needs of
that Region.

     Since its original preparation in December 1974, this report has been
widely accepted and acclaimed, as can be shown by the continued and increasing
requests for copies.  The Robert S. Kerr Environmental  Research Laboratory
acknowledges with appreciation such favorable response which has resulted in
this publication of "Nutrient, Bacterial, and Virus Control  as Related to
Ground-Water Contamination."
                                    VI

-------
                                INTRODUCTION
GENERAL
     For those associated with the development and protection of ground water,
the most worrisome problem has traditionally been a lack of knowledge  on  the
part of those outside their fraternity.   This is exemplified in  understanding
the movement and fate of nutrients, bacteria, and viruses in the subsurface
environment.

     As early as the 17th century, John  Ray, the English naturalist, and  Renef
Descartes, a French mathematician and philosopher, made astoundingly accurate
observations concerning the mysterious movement of underground water.   In 1856
Henry Darcy established a mathematical base for the laminar flow of ground
water in its porous environment.

     Yet, in 1861 an Ohio court ruled, "Because the existence, origin, move-
ment and course of such waters> and the  causes which govern and  direct their
movement are so secret, occult and concealed that an attempt to  administer
any set of legal rules in respect to them would be, therefore, practically
impossible."

     In more recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the value
of underground water in terms of the Nation's water resources and the  importance
of protecting these waters from contamination.

GROUND-WATER USE

     Estimates vary but it is certain that this Country's recoverable  ground
water exceeds all surface sources by something in the neighborhood of  one
order of magnitude.  Approximately 20 percent of the total national water
demands are met by ground water.   It accounts for more than 85 percent of the
public water supply in several States and furnishes the total or partial  water
supply for over 30 of the Nation's 100 largest cities.  It is estimated that
more than 50 percent of the national population and more than 95 percent  of
the rural population receive their drinking water from ground-water resources.

GROUND-WATER POLLUTION

     The implication of allowing ground-water resources to become polluted
cannot be overstated.  Air poWution has a residence time usually measured in
hours, while in streams and rivers it is considered in terms of  days.   Even in
surface reservoirs where pollution residence is measured in months, the impli-
cations fall far short of ground-water reservoirs where pollutants are likely

-------
 to  remain  for decades or perhaps centuries.  Consequently, the restoration of
 a contaminated ground-water resource is lengthy and expensive at best and
 difficult,  if not  impossible, at worst.

     The very core of understanding the fate of pollutants in the sursurface
 environment is a complete understanding of the subsurface environment as a
 pollution  receptor.  This environment is a horrendously complex area in which
 the geologic matrix varies greatly in both the vertical and horizontal direc-
 tions.  In  this zone there exists tremendous surface areas available for the
 sorption of pollutional parameters.  These surfaces provide long retention
 periods during which time many physical, chemical, and biochemical alterations
 may take place in an environment where nutrients, moisture, temperature, pH,
 oxidation-reduction potential, and the numbers and species of biological life
 vary markedly within only short distances.  The dilemma is compounded with
 the realization that the parent pollutant as well as its myriad of degrada-
 tion products must be accounted for in their movement through this complex
 environment.

     Contamination of ground water rarely occurs in a dramatic fashion.   There-
 fore, continuous monitoring near a suspected source of contamination can pro-
 duce a false sense of security while, in fact, the clandestine movement of
 pollutants  is relentlessly proceeding.   The diffuse and diverse nature of
 ground-water pollution further compounds the problems of control  and
 abatement.

     There  are three basic mechanisms by which ground water can become con-
 taminated.   The first occurs only after pollutants have traversed the soil-
 vegetation  matrix overlying and providing a measure of protection for
 subsurface  waters.   The second can occur when pollutants are directly intro-
 duced to ground water, as through well  disposal or construction of waste
 disposal facilities (landfills, septic tank laterals, lagoons, etc.), within
 the water table itself.   The third results from hydraulic or chemical alter-
 ations which allow polluting substances to move within or between aquifers.

     Four reports have been completed (1, 2, 3, 4) which, among other things,
 presented by priority the major ground-water pollution problems within those
 parts of the Country covered.   Table 1  presents the ten most prevalent
 problems as excerpted from those reports.

     It can be seen from Table 1  that many of the most prevalent ground-water
pollution problems  portend the addition of nutrients, bacteria, and viruses
to ground-water supplies.   These are the pollutional  parameters with which
this report will  specifically  deal.

-------
                      Table 1.  PRIORITY SOURCES OF GROUND-WATER POLLUTION
         Southwest
  South Central
     Northeast
  Northwest
 1.  Natural Leaching         Natural  Pollution
 2.  Irrigation Return Flow   Oil  Field Brine

 3.  Sea Water Encroachment   Well  Construction
 4.   Solid Wastes
 5.   Disposal of Oil Field
      Brines
 6.   Animal Wastes
 7.   Accidental  Spills--
      Hazardous  Materials
 8.   Water from  Fault Zones
      and Volcanic Origin
 9.   Evapotranspiration
      from Native Vegetation
10.   Injection Wells for
      Waste Disposal
Overpumping
Irrigation Return
 Flow
Land Application of
 Wastes
Solid Wastes
                         Septic Tanks and Cesspools    Septic Systems
                         Buried Pipelines and
                          Storage Tanks
                         Highway Deicing Salts
Landfills
Surface Impoundments
Spills and Surface
 Discharges
Mining Activity
Evapotranspiration from  Petroleum Exploration and
 Native Vegetation        Development
Animal Wastes
Waste Lagoons
Salt Water Intrusion
River Infiltration
Sewage Treatment
 Plant Discharges
Irrigation Return
 Flow
Dry Land Farming
Abandoned Oil Wells
 and Test Wells
Brine Injection
Disposal Wells
                              Surface Impoundments
Mine Drainage and
 Mine Tailings
Urban and Industrial
 Landfi11s

-------
                           NUTRIENTS IN GROUND WATER
     For  purposes of this report, phosphorus and the compounds of nitrogen
will be used  to describe categorically the potential of ground-water contami-
nation by nutrients.  A dissertation covering all of the materials that might
serve as  a nutrient to all forms of life would be quite beyond the scope of
this writing.  Nevertheless, phosphorus and nitrogen serve well to describe
the fate  of such substances in the subsurface due to their diverse behavior
in this environment.

PHOSPHORUS

     The  fate of phosphorus in the subsurface environment is dependent upon
two factors.  The first is concerned with the residual phosphorus concentra-
tion in the soil solution which is controlled by the solubility of naturally-
occurring phosphate minerals.  The second factor is the soil's capacity to
sorb phosphorus and the kinetics of this reaction.  Generally, phosphorus
compounds entering the subsurface environment do not present a great threat
to ground-water quality.  At least this could not be considered a high
priority  in the protection of ground-water quality.

     In the presence of iron, aluminum, manganese, and calcium cations phos-
phorus compounds become relatively insoluble mineral components of the soil
matrix.  These reactions are dependent upon a number of factors among which
pH is one of the most important in the subsurface environment.  Figure 1 (5)
provides  a qualitative description of the fate of phosphorus compounds in soils
versus pH.  With some knowledge of the type of soil encountered and pH, it is
possible  to make some judgment as to the fate of phosphorus in this environment.
Two additional factors must be considered when phosphorus compounds are intro-
duced to the soils.  There must be adequate time for these reactions to take
place, and care must be taken that the sorptive capacity of the soil is not
exceeded.   In a great many cases these limitations should not present particu-
lar difficulties with respect to ground-water contamination.  There are, how-
ever, circumstances where consideration should be given to assure that adequate
soil  types and depths are available to provide sufficient time and sorptive
capacity.

     There are cases where impermeable rocks lie near the surface with very
thin soil  cover.   The application of phosphorus-containing wastes in these
types of geology could result in the contamination of nearby streams.  Frac-
tured rocks under similar conditions could allow phosphorus compounds to
travel  considerable distances in the ground water to discharge to surface
waters  or to reach water supply wells.

     The ability of soils to sorb phosphorus is often measured in terms of the
equilibrium isotherms of Langmuir or Freundlich (6).  Although these equations

-------
                      Soluble Forms
Z
o
h-
0_
or
o
to
>
I-
LJ
a:
Sorption

By Hydrous

Oxides of Iron

Aluminum S Mongonese
                                 Sorption
                                 By  Calcium
Reaction
    With
      Silicate
          Minerals
        Sorption
        By Soluble
        Fe, Al,  a Mn

             I	
                                           pH
                    Figure 1;  Fate of phosphorus  compounds  in soils

-------
 assume that equilibrium  is  reached  instantaneously, they can be helpful for
 many purposes.   Non-equilibrium models  (7) may be necessary when considering
 the long-term sorptive capacity of  soils  in large projects such as the
 application of wastes to the soil by spray irrigation or soil infiltration.

 NITROGEN

      Many  sources  of potential ground-water contamination contain organic and
 inorganic  forms of nitrogen.   It  is generally believed that the organic frac-
 tion is bound either by  sorption  on the soil matrix or is incorporated in the
 cellular material  of the resident biological community.  Of course, these are
 kinetic reactions  wherein microbial utilization, sorption, and degradation
 are continuing  processes until eventual stabilization is reached.

      These are  extremely complex  reactions which are further complicated by
 being in an environment  which  is  itself complex.  The subsurface environment
 changes radically  within only  short distances either vertically or horizontally.
 These changes in the soil matrix, its moisture content, the availability of
 nutrient material, oxygen, and the numbers and species of biological life
 probably keep organic compounds and their degradation products in a continual
 and lethargic state of flux.

      There has  been little research concerning the movement of organic nitro-
 gen compounds in the subsurface environment.  It can only be postulated that
 if  these compounds or their products of degradation do move to great extents
 through the unsaturated  zone such movement would likely be very slow.  Once
 they have  reached  the saturated zone or water table their potential to
 contaminate wells  or other points of discharge would be entirely speculative.

      Most  concern  and, therefore, most research on the fate of nitrogen com-
 pounds in  the subsurface  environment is directed toward nitrate and nitrite
 ions.  Usually  this concern is associated with methemoglobinemia in infants
 and ruminants.   In addition, there is evidence that high nitrate water can
 cause chemical  diarrhea  in humans and a number of maladies in livestock,
 including  thyroid  problems, rickets, enteritis, arthritis, and general poor
 health.  That nitrate and particularly nitrite might react in the human
 stomach with  secondary amines  (from cooked food) to form nitrosamines, some
 of  which are  highly carcinogenic, is a possibility currently under investi-
 gation by  various  research groups.

      An abundance of recent literature suggests that the nitrate problem in
 ground water  is  more widespread than was previously noted.  As might be
 expected, many  reports of local contamination have been related to septic
 tanks, irrigation practices, animal  feedlots, and the land disposal of wastes,
 only  to name  a  few.  There have also been reports of nitrate contamination
 well  over  100 mg/1  in remote pasture areas where they could not be attributed
 to  the activities of man.  The most probable source of this natural nitrate is
 the degradation  of vegetation accompanied by climatic and land use patterns
which allow  its  concentration below the normal  root zone.

      In many  instances the presence or absence of ground-water nitrates is
 paradoxical.  Nitrates can be found where least expected and be in IQW con-
centrations or missing in areas where they would seem most likely to exist in

-------
 high  quantities.  As mentioned above, very high natural concentrations can be
 found if  the  correct combination of climatic and land use patterns exists (8).
 Organic nitrogen may be  converted by microbial processes to ammonia, which can
 be  lost to  the  atmosphere by vaporization, retained by the soil, or oxidized,
 principally by  chemoautotrophic bacteria, to nitrite and finally nitrate.  The
 oxidative process may  be essentially reversed under anaerobic conditions by
 facultative and obligately anaerobic chemoorganotrophic bacteria, provided
 nutrients and organic  matter sufficient for the matabolic activities of these
 microbes  are  present.  This is called denitrification and results in the con-
 version of  nitrate  to  nitrogen gas which usually finds its way to the
 atmosphere.

      Although denitrification provides a means for nitrate removal and has
 been  used as  such for  surface waters, it is not presently known if this is a
 feasible  technique  for in situ ground water.  Those cases where nitrate has
 been  reduced  in ground water have resulted more from good fortune rather than
 a planned control program.

      Control  measures  are associated in operations where waste is applied to
 the land.   Spray irrigation, for example, is based on the premise that the
 nutrient  uptake by  plants will be efficient under a proper hydraulic and
 nutrient  loading, generally in the neighborhood of two inches per week during
 the growing season.  Soil infiltration systems count on denitrification by
 loadings  sufficient to create an anaerobic environment within the soil matrix.
 These loadings  are  about 2-3 feet per week with proper rest periods between
 applications  to prevent  biological growths from plugging the soil.  The proper
 use of septic tank  systems must rely on an installation density low enough to
 limit the amount of nitrates entering ground water.  Work is under way now at
 Texas A&M to  determine the allowable septic tank density for various geologic
 conditions.

      Once an  aquifer is  contaminated only dilution, proper aquifer selection,
 or  well construction can be used with assurance to control the concentration of
 nitrates  in drinking water.  Although nitrates can be removed from wastewater
 by  algae  ponds, ion exchange, ammonia stripping, microbial denitrification, and
 electrodialysis, these techniques are generally not feasible in many instances.
 The prevention  of ground-water contamination would seem to be the most economi-
 cal course.   The most  interesting and promising new technology for identifying
"the source  of nitrate  contamination makes use of the stable isotope ratios of
 nitrogen.   The  technique has been used to differentiate between natural and
 several man-made sources of nitrate contamination in ground water.

 BACTERIA  AND  VIRUSES

      The  pollutional potential of bacteria and viruses in ground water is
 essentially equatable  to their time of survival and the distances they might
 traverse  during this time.  The time of survival and the distance traveled is
 dependent on  the organisms' abilities to overcome various environmental
 obstacles.

      Some factors affecting the survival of bacteria and viruses in surface
 aquatic environments are relatively unimportant in soil and ground waters.

-------
  Bacteria and viruses are generally tolerate of the pH, temperature, and
  osmotic conditions existing in soil and non-saline ground-water aquifers.

      Other factors are important, however.  The survival of bacteria is en-
  hanced by increased soil moisture and organic matter which can serve as a
  food source.

      The survival of bacteria can be altered by predators such as protozoa.
  Some soil organisms produce antibiotics such as actinomycin and streptomycin
 which kill  susceptible bacteria.   The action of bacteriophages on bacteria in
 water and soil  reduce the survival time of susceptible bacteria.

      As in  other environments, the ability of different organisms to survive
  in ground water will  vary.   Coliforms were chosen as  indicators of fecal
 pollution in surface  waters because of their ability  to survive longer than
 most enteric pathogens.   However, some preliminary studies  indicate that  the
 lack of demonstrable  coliform levels  in ground waters may not  preclude the
 presence of pathogens,  especially viruses.

      The removal  of bacteria and  viruses by passage through soil  is now thought
 to be primarily due to  adsorption onto the soil  particles,  as  well  as  physical
 removal  by  filtration.

      Bacteria and viruses vary greatly in  size and shape.   This variance  ob-
 viously affects their mobility in the sense of their  physical  filterability.
 Figure  2  provides a graphical  comparison of several microorganisms  ranging
 from an amoeba  and bacterial  to the poliomyelitis  virus,  a  size differential
 of over three orders of magnitude.

      In  highly  fractured limestone or basaltic  geology,  it  is  conceivable  that
 many microorganisms could travel  great distances  provided they were in  an
 environment  conducive to their survival.   In consolidated sands only the
 smaller viruses could be expected  to  travel  any appreciable distance without
 being physically  filtered.

      The factors  affecting adsorption  by soils of  bacteria and  viruses  are not
 very well understood.   The type of soil  is  important—a soil such as clay  with
 a large surface area per unit  of volume  being best.

      Bacteria and  viruses may  survive  for long periods after being  adsorbed.
 This  is potentially important  since the  adsorption may be reversible.

      Generally,  it  has been assumed that within reasonable distances micro-
 organisms will  be  removed from waters percolating or moving through consoli-
 dated or unconsolidated media such as sands, loams, or clays, but the validity
 of this assumption requires  further investigation, particularly in  the case of
 viruses.  In fractured rocks both  bacteria and viruses may travel  for great
 distances.

     Although certain  speculations have been made here, there has not been a
sufficient amount of knowledge accumulated on the survival of bacteria and

-------
              Entomoebo histolytico (Amebic
                Dysentery Amoeba) 20ju x 25ju
              Escherichia coli (Indicator
               Bacterium)  0.5/j x I.Oju x 2.0>u
              Solmonello typhoso  (Typhoid
                Fever Bacterium)
                0.6 ju x 0.7/j x 2.5/1
      —«      Shigello sp.  (Bacillary
                 Dysentery  Bacterium)
                 0.4/1 x 0.6/j  x 2.5ju
              Psittacosis  Virus
                 0.25ju
              Bacteriophage Virus
                 O.l/i
               Poliomyelitis Virus
                 O.OI/J
Figure 2.  Size  comparison of microorganisms,

-------
particularly viruses in ground water.   Increased stresses  on this  environment
such as the application of wastes to the land and lagoons  and landfills  of
one nature or another will undoubtedly require additional  knowledge  now  or  in
the near future.
                                    10

-------
                            SOURCES OF EXPERTISE


     The following are offered as direct sources of information for the
subjects contained herein.  They are not suggested as the sole source or
necessarily the world's leading authorities.   They are,  however, researchers
working in the areas described who possess the current state-of-knowledge  on
the subjects themselves and who through their associations can provide addi-
tional references which should provide sufficient information in answer to
the most detailed questions.

NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS

     P. F. Pratt
     University of California
     Riverside, California  92507
     (714/787-5102)

     Carl G. Enfield
     Wastewater Management Branch
     Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Post Office Box 1198
     Ada, Oklahoma  74820
     (405/332-8800)

     Herman Bouwer
     U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory
     Agricultural Research Service
     U.S. Department of Agriculture
     4331 East Broadway
     Phoenix, Arizona  85040
     (602/261-4356)

BACTERIA AND VIRUSES

     James F. McNabb
     Ground Water Research Branch
     Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Post Office Box 1198
     Ada, Oklahoma  74820
     (405/332-8800)
                                    11

-------
 LAND TREATMENT OF WASTES

      Richard E.  Thomas
      Wastewater Management Branch
      Robert S.  Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
      U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
      Post Office  Box 1198
      Ada,  Oklahoma  74820
      (405/332-8800)

 SEPTIC TANKS

      Kirk  W.  Brown
      Assistant  Professor of Soil  Physics
      Texas A&M  Research  Foundation
      Post  Office Box Faculty Exchange  H
      College Station,  Texas  77843
      (713/845-5251)

      James F. Kreissl
      Municipal Environmental  Research  Laboratory
      U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
      26 West St.  Clair Street
      Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268
      (513/684-7614)

 AGRICULTURAL  PRACTICES

      James  P. Law
      Source Management Branch
      Robert S. Kerr Environmental  Research Laboratory
      U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
      Post  Office  Box 1198
     Ada,  Oklahoma  74820
      (405/332-8800)

      Ronald G. Menzil, Location Leader
     USDA-ARS Water Quality Management Laboratory
     Route #2, Box 322A
     Durant, Oklahoma  74701
      (405/924-5066)

SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

     William J.  Dunlap
     Ground Water Research Branch
     Robert S. Kerr Environmental  Research Laboratory
     U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
     Post  Office  Box 1198
     Ada,  Oklahoma  74820
     (405/332-8800)
                                    12

-------
                                BIBLIOGRAPHY


     The following references are offered as supplementary reading material
 to these areas of discussion.  They are taken from work accomplished by
 General Electric, TEMPO (9) under contract with the Environmental  Protection
 Agency's Office of Monitoring Systems.

 NUTRIENTS

 1.  Anonymous.  Fertilizers and Feedlots—What Role in Groundwater Pollution?
     Agricultural Research, 18(6):14-15.  1969.

 2.  Ayers, R. S., and R.  L. Branson (editors).  Nitrates in the Upper Santa
     Ana River Basin in Relation to Groundwater Pollution.  Calif. Agric.  Exp.
     Sta. Bull. 861, 59 pp.  May 1973.

 3.  Black, C. A.  Behavior of Soil and Fertilizer Phosphorus in Relation  to
     Water Pollution.  In:  Agricultural Practices and Water Quality, T.  L.
     Willrich and G. E. Smith, eds.  Iowa State Univ.  Press, Ames, pp. 72-93.
     1970.

 4.  Blancher, R. W., and C. VI.  Kao.  Effects of Recent and Past Phosphate
     Fertilization on the Amount of Phosphorus Percolating Through Soil
     Profiles into Subsurface Waters.   Project Completion Report,  Missouri
     Water Resources Research Center,  Columbia, 106 pp.  July 1971.

 5.  California Bureau of Sanitary Engineering.  Occurrence of Nitrate in
     Ground Water Supplies in Southern California.  California State Dept. of
     Public Health, 7 pp.   February 1963.

 6.  California Dept. of Water Resources.   Delano Nitrate Investigation.
     Bulletin 143-6, 42 pp.  1968.

 7.  Crabtree, J. H.   Nitrate Variation in Groundwater.  Supplementary Report,
     Wisconsin Univ., Madison Water Resources Center,  60 pp.  1970.

 8.  Dawes, J. H.,  et al.    Nitrate Pollution of Water.  In:  Frontiers of
     Conservation,  Proceedings of 24th Annual Meeting  of the Soil  Conserva-
     tion Soc. of Amer.,  Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, pp.  94-102.   1970.

 9.  Engberg, R.  A.   The Nitrate Hazard in Well Water  With Special Reference
     to Holt County,  Nebraska.   Nebraska Water Survey  Paper 21,  Conservation
     and Survey Div., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, 18 pp.   1967.

10.  Environment Staff Report.   Poisoning the Wells.  Environment, 11(1):
     16-23, 45.   1969.


                                     13

-------
 11.  Goldberg, M. C.  Sources of Nitrogen in Water Supplies.   In:   Agricultural
     Practices and Water Quality, T. L. Willrich and G. E.  Smith (eds.),  Iowa
     State Univ. Press, Ames, pp. 94-124.  1970.

 12.  Keeny, D. R.  Nitrates in Plants and Waters.  Jour,  of Milk and Food
     Technology, 33(10):425-432.  1970.

 13.  Kimnel, G. E.  Nitrogen Content of Ground Water in Kings County, Long
     Island, NY.  Geological Survey Research 1972, U.S. Geological  Survey
     Prof. Paper 800-D.  1972.

 14.  Lance, J. C.  Nitrogen Removal by Soil  Mechanisms.  Jour,  of Water
     Pollution Control Fed., 44(7):1352-1361.   1972.

 15.  Larson, T. E., and L. M. Henley.  Occurrence of Nitrate in Well  Waters.
     Research Report 1, Univ. of Illinois Water Resources Center,  8 pp.   1966.

 16.  Miller, J. C.  Nitrate Contamination of the Water-Table Aquifer in
     Delaware.  Report of Investigations No. 20, Delaware Geological  Survey,
     Newark, 36 pp.  May 1972.

 17.  Murphy, S., and J. W. Gosch.  Nitrate Accumulation in  Kansas  Groundwater.
     Project Completion Report, Kansas Water Resources Research Inst.,  Kansas
     State Univ., Manhattan, 56 pp.  March 1970.

 18.  Navone, R., et al.  Nitrogen Content of Ground Water in Southern Cali-
     fornia.  Jour,  of Amer. Water Works Assoc., 55:615-618.   1963.

 19.  Nightingale, H. I.  Statistical Evaluation of Salinity and Nitrate
     Content and Trends Beneath Urban and Agricultural Area—Fresno,
     California.  Ground Water, 8(1):22-28.   1970.

 20.  Nightingale, H. I.  Nitrates in Soil and  Groundwater Beneath  Irrigated
     and Fertilized Crops.  Soil Science, 114(4):300-311.  1972.

 21.  Olsen, R. J.  Effect of Various Factors on Movement  of Nitrate Nitrogen
     in Soil  Profiles and on Transformations of Soil Nitrogen.   Water Resources
     Center Report 1969,  Univ. of Wisconsin, 79 pp.  1969.

 22.  Peele, T. C., and J.  T. Gillingham.  Influence of Fertilization  and  Crops
     on  Nitrate Content of Groundwater and  Tile Drainage Effluent.   Report
     No. 33,  Water Resources Research Inst., Clemson Univ., Clemson,  S.C.,
     19 pp.  1972.

23.  Pratt, P. F.,  et al.   Nitrate in Deep Soil  Profiles  in Relation  to
     Fertilizer Rates and Leaching Volume.   Jour,  of Environmental  Quality,
     1(1):97-102.  1972.

24.  Pratt, P. F.  Nitrate in the Unsaturated  Zone Under  Agricultural  Lands.
     U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency Report EPA-16060-DOE-04/72,  Water
     Pollution Control  Research Series, 45 pp.   April  1972.


                                     14

-------
25.  Schmidt, K. D.  The Use of Chemical  Hydrographs in Groundwater  Quality
     Studies.  In:  Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona  and  the South-
     west, Proceedings of Arizona Section-Amer.  Water Resources Assoc.  and
     Hydrology Section-Arizona Academy of Science,  1:211-223.  1971.

26.  Schmidt, K. D.  Nitrate in Ground Water of the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan
     Area, California.  Ground Water, 10(1):50-61.   1972.

27.  Sepp, E.  Nitrogen Cycle in Ground Water.   Bureau of  Sanitary Engineering,
     California Dept. of Public Health, 23 pp.   1970.

28.  Shaffer, M. J., et al.   Predicting Changes in  Nitrogenous Compounds  in
     Soil-Water Systems.  In:  Collected Papers Regarding  Nitrates in Agricul-
     tural Waste Waters, Federal Water Quality  Admin.  Water Pollution Control
     Research Series 13030 ELY 12/69, pp.  15-28.   December 1969.

29.  Snoeyink, Y., and V.  Griffin.   Nitrate and Water Supply:  Source and
     Control.  Illinois Univ., College of Engineering Publication, 195  pp.
     1970.

30.  Stout, P. R., et al.   A Study of the Vertical  Movement of Nitrogenous
     Matter from the Ground Surface to the Water Table in  the Vicinity  of
     Grover City and Arroyo Grande, San Luis Obispo County.   Research Report,
     Univ. of California,  Davis, Dept. of Soils and Plant  Nutrition, 51 pp.
     January 1965.

31.  Taylor, R.  G., and P. D. Bigbee.  Fluctuations in Nitrate Concentrations
     Utilized as an Assessment of Agricultural  Contamination  to an Aquifer
     of a Semiarid Climatic Region.  Partial Completion Report 006,  Mexico
     Water Resources Research Institute,  Las Cruces, 12 pp.   August  1972.

32.  U.S. Federal  Water Quality Admin.  Collected Papers Regarding Nitrates
     in Agricultural Waste Waters.   Federal  Water Quality  Admin.  Water
     Pollution Control Research Series 13030 ELY 12/69, 186 pp.   December
     1969.

33.  Viets, F. J., and R.  H.  Hageman.  Factors  Affecting the  Accumulation of
     Nitrate in Soil, Water and Plants.  Agriculture Handbook 413, Agricultural
     Research Service, U.S.  Dept.  of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.,  63  pp.
     1971.

34.  Walker, E.  H.  Ground-Water Resources of the Hopkinsville Quadrangle,
     Kentucky.  U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper  1328, 98 pp.  1956.

35.  Walker, W.  H.  Ground-Water Nitrate Pollution  in Rural Areas.  Ground
     Water, ll(5):19-22.  Sept.-Oct.  1973.

36.  Ward, P. C.  Existing Levels of Nitrates in Water—The California
     Situation.   In:  Proceedings of 12th Sanitary  Engineering Conference
     on Nitrate and Water  Supply:   Source and Control, Univ.  of Illinois,
     Urbana, College of Engineering Publication,  pp. 14-26.   1970.
                                    15

-------
 37.  Willardson, L.  S.,  et al.   Drain  Installation  for  Nitrate  Reduction.
      Ground Water, 8(4):11-13.   1970.

 38.  Willardson, L.  S.,  et al.   Nitrate  Reduction with  Submerged Drains.
      Trans,  of Amer.  Soc.  of Agricultural  Engineers,  15(1):84-85, 90.  1972.

 39.  Winton, E.  F.,  et al.   Nitrate  in Drinking Water:  Public  Health Aspects.
      Jour.  Amer.  Water Works Assoc., 63(2):95-98.   1971.

 40.  Witzel, S.  A.,  et al.   Nitrogen Cycle in Surface and Subsurface Waters.
      Technical  Completion  Report, Univ.  of Wisconsin, Water Resources Center,
      65  pp.   December 1968.

 BACTERIA AND VIRUSES

 41.  Bigbee,  P.  D., and  R.  G. Taylor.  Pollution Studies of the Regional
      Ogallala Aquifer at Portales, New Mexico.  Partial Completion Report
      005, New Mexico  Water  Resources Research Inst., Las Cruces, 30 pp.
      August  1972.

 42.   Carlson, G.  F.,  et  al.  Virus Inactivation on Clay Particles in Natural
      Waters.  Jour, of the  Water Pollution Control Fed., 40(2):R89-R106.  1968.

 43.   Drewry,  W. A., and  R.  Eliassen.  Virus Movement in Groundwater.  Jour.
      of  the  Water Pollution  Control  Fed., 40(8)Part 2:R257-R271.  1968.

 44.   Drewry,  W. A.  Virus Movement in Groundwater Systems.   Report No.  Pub-4,
      Water Resources  Research Center, Arkansas,  Univ. of Fayetteville,  85 pp.
      September 1969.

 45.   Hori, D. H., et al.   Migration  of Poliovirus Type 2 in Percolating Water
      Through Selected Oahu Soils.  Technical  Report No.  36, Hawaii  Water
      Resources Research Center,  Univ. of Hawaii,  Honolulu,  40 pp.   January
      1970.

 46.   Ritter, C., and W.  J.  Hausler,  Jr.   Yearly  Variation  in  Sanitary Quality
     of Well Water.  Amer.  Jour, of  Public Health,  51(9):1347-1357.   1961.

47.  Tanimoto, R. M., et  al.  Migration  of Bacteriophage T4 in Percolating
     Water Through Selected Oahu Soils.   Technical  Report No.  20,  Water
     Resources Research  Center,  Univ.  of Hawaii,  Honolulu,  45 pp.   June 1968.

48.  Vander Velde, T.  L.   Poliovirus  in  a Water Supply.  Jour,  of  Amer.  Water
     Works Assoc., 65(5):345-346.  May  1974.
                                    16

-------
                                REFERENCES


1.   Fuhriman, Barton, and Associates.  Ground Water Pollution in Arizona,
     California, Nevada, and Utah.  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
     Report 16060-ERU-12/71, 259 pp.  December 1971.

2.   Scalf, Marion R., et al.  Ground Water Pollution in the South Central
     States.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-R2-73-268,
     181 pp.  June 1973.

3.   Miller, David W., et al.  Ground Water Contamination in the Northeast
     States.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-660/2-74-056,
     338 pp.  June 1974.

4.   Miller, David W., et al.  Ground Water Pollution Problems in the
     Northwestern United States.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Report EPA-660/3-75-018, 361 pp.  May 1975.

5.   Enfield, Carl G., and Bert E. Bledsoe.  Fate of Wastewater Phosphorus
     in Soil.  Jour. Irrig. Drainage Div., Amer.  Soc. of Civil Eng.,
     101(IR3):145-155.  September 1975.

6.   01 sen, Sterling R., and Frank S. Watanabe.   A Method to Determine  a
     Phosphorus Adsorption Maximum of Soil as Measured by the Langmuir
     Isotherm.  Soil Science Society of Amer. Proceedings, 21:144-149.   1957.

7.   Enfield, Carl G.  Rate of Phosphorus Sorption by Five Oklahoma Soils.
     Soil Science Society of Amer. Proceedings,  38:404-407.   1974.

8.   Jones, David C.  An Investigation of the Nitrate Problem in Runnels
     County, Texas.   U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency Report EPA-R2-73-
     267, 220 pp.  June 1973.

9.   Todd, D. K., and D. E. McNulty.  Polluted Groundwater:   A Review of
     the Significant Literature.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Report EPA-600/4-74-001, 216 pp.  March 1974.
                                    17

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.

   EPA-600/8-77-010
              3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
    NUTRIENT,  BACTERIAL, AND VIRUS  CONTROL AS RELATED
    TO GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION
              5. REPORT DATE
                July  1977  issuing date
              6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHOR(S)
    James F. McNabb, William J.  Dunlap, and
    Jack W.  Keeley
              8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO,
 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
    Robert S. Kerr  Environmental Research Lab.
    Office of Research & Development
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    Ada, Oklahoma   74820
  - Ada,  OK
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1BA609
              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                      N/A
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
    Same as above.
                                                             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                             	Special	
                                                             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                                   EPA/600/15
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
         A general introduction provides  something of the  history of ground-
   water, its present  use, and the means by which it can  become contaminated.
   A  priority listing  of sources of ground-water contamination is presented
   for four geographical  areas of the United States.

         Phosphorus is  discussed in terms of its fate in soil  systems.  The fate
   of organic and inorganic nitrogen compounds is also discussed giving consid-
   eration to sorption and biological utilization and degradation.   Criteria
   important to the survival  and transport of bacteria and  viruses  is presented
   along with information concerning indicator organisms  in the subsurface
   environment.
 7.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                               b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                           c.  COS AT I Field/Group
   Ground Water,  Pollution,  Bacteria,
   Phosphorus  inorganic compound,  Viruses
  Nutrients
            13B
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

   Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
    Unclassified
                            21. NO. OF PAGES
              24
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                   Unclassified
                                                                          22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                              18  -to If- *• GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1977-757-056/6504 Region No. 5-11

-------